Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @pjbowman is optimistic about the vehicle's selling prospects this time. @Lannis believes the no-reserve auction is a bold but potentially good move for this car, while @IBLBCfan expresses hope that it will find a new home and anticipates the market's evolution by 2025. @Valkyrja highlights a sense of hope, implying that the third time might indeed be the charm for the sale, and @healeyrick reaffirms the car's enjoyable driving potential alongside its solid specifications, bringing confidence to its appeal as a collector's item.
Neutral: Comments from @Juliandeakin raise practical questions about the car's condition and appeal, such as their inquiry regarding a noted crack and engine replacement's impact on value. @howdoyoufitinthat provides a perspective on the originality debate by suggesting that the significance of the original engine may vary among potential buyers. @911r (The Seller) addresses inquiries, confirming the car's restoration quality and responding to questions about the auction's video. The conversation reflects a shared interest among commentors in understanding the vehicle's details.
Negative: Concerns arise from @mwagon, who disputes the seller's claim of a complete restoration on the car, suggesting it may mislead potential buyers about the extent of the work done. In addition, @oshkosh99 humorously critiques the number of times the vehicle has been auctioned, implying a lack of interest or potential issues with the car. Furthermore, there is also skepticism from @Rusty.Friddell about the absence of a first-gear demonstration in the video, adding a note of doubt about the presentation of the vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @skonker describes the vehicle as having its 'Beast mode' activated, emphasizing its striking and aggressive aesthetics. @HunterSmall praises the car as a 'beauty' that showcases Mercedes' recent technology, highlighting its modern features. @allin938 adds that the car 'screams business', suggesting it has a commanding presence. @buybid22 (The Seller) expresses pride in the vehicle, noting that it is in beautiful, well-kept original condition with no issues, thanks to tasteful RENNtech upgrades. The combination of performance and quality makes it a standout choice for enthusiasts.
Neutral: @OneOfEach comments on the car's modifications, acknowledging the respect for RENNtech but raises concerns regarding potential warranty issues. He mentions that while modifications can often impact value, he personally would love to own this vehicle. The discussion also touches on the aftermarket warranties offered by RENNtech, with @Tangerine997 noting that these warranties come at a high cost and are optional rather than standard. @theforce88 simply describes the car as beautiful, reflecting a neutral endorsement without elaboration.
Negative: @SirMercsALot offers a critical perspective, suggesting the vehicle has had multiple owners who may not have driven it much, raising questions about its usage and durability. @OneOfEach also expresses concern over the optional nature of aftermarket warranties and the lack of availability when previously listed, calling this a disappointment. Overall, while there are many positive comments, the concerns about ownership history and warranty coverage introduce some skepticism regarding the vehicle's value and reliability.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the 1967 Chevrolet Corvette, highlighting its unique features and historical significance. @racer355, the seller, emphasized the car's potential with an enthusiastic commitment to provide answers and promote inspections to prospective buyers. @TwoBryans praised the vehicle's condition, boosting its appeal by mentioning the long ownership and low mileage. @bkoz52 and @Gmmuscleusa expressed their preference for enjoyable drivers over perfect restorations, indicating a passion for appreciating cars in their current state.
Neutral: Commentary on the vehicle's condition varied, with some recognizing its awesome design and originality while others raised concerns over its repaint and certain structural issues. @LHC questioned the use of black vinyl, and @8822mclennan noted it is a repaint but still has high market potential due to its ownership history. @Shootnride suggested that the car's pillar condition warranted an in-person inspection, highlighting specific areas that might need attention, which shows a balanced view of the vehicle's standing in the market.
Negative: Comments regarding the vehicle's condition leaned toward the cautious, with several users noting significant issues that could hinder its value or functioning. @Midyearfan pointed out the birdcage condition as a major flaw, while @RockaChaw detailed the deep rust and other aesthetic concerns. @trVette66 provided a sobering evaluation, suggesting a full restoration is necessary due to extensive rot, indicating that these repairs may require a significant investment. Overall, there was a sense that potential buyers should carefully assess the car's needs before proceeding.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Siowner describes the vehicle as an old-school R/T with a striking Hemi orange color, highlighting its low mileage and abundance of horsepower, suggesting a positive impression of its performance and aesthetics.
Neutral: @Meadekev raises a question regarding the prevalence of the hemi tick in 2009 models, indicating curiosity about the reliability issues that might exist while also noting that some recalls have been addressed since that time. This reflects a general awareness of the vehicle's history without a definitive stance on its quality.
Negative: @roagtradr points out that the tire in the picture is date coded 2008, which implies that the tires are original and have not been replaced, potentially indicating a lack of maintenance or updates to the vehicle, raising concerns for potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters generally praised the vehicle's aesthetics and driving performance, with @nsanb calling it a "Good looking mini!" and @DUGEEEFRESH04 noting its attractive views alongside comments like those from @jpr reminiscing about their first Datsun. @lincnessmonster expressed excitement with "Great truck! GLWA!" highlighting the truck's value as a nostalgic piece of engineering that many have fond memories of.
Neutral: Many commenters engaged with questions about the vehicle and shared their own experiences. @bicyclesteve raised a query about the manual transmission, which @CaprockClassics confirmed was a common feature for that model year. @pwinfrey (The Seller) offered insights into the truck's usability, stating that while it doesn't come with A/C, all lights and gauges work. There were also inquiries about potential modifications or specific functions, such as the factory pollution control equipment and seating capacity.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns regarding the vehicle's suitability for certain states, particularly with regards to emissions compliance as pointed out by @Samwinchester67. @barry1080 noted possible cosmetic issues in the paintwork with runs present in the finish, while @clueless_jalop lamented the absence of A/C and vent windows, speculating about the discomfort during warmer weather. Overall, while the truck has its fans, certain features detract from its desirability for potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters are excited about the vehicle, praising it as a remarkable innovation. @J-Cup expressed sheer admiration, calling it 'awesome' and wishing good luck to the seller (GLWTA). @djimbe pointed out that this version is vastly improved, functioning well both on land and water, while @stugottz reiterated enthusiasm about its water capabilities, emphasizing that 45 mph is quite fast.
Neutral: Several users provided practical insights about the vehicle's usability and potential. @1996MBZ highlighted its convenience for those living near water, eliminating the need for towing. Meanwhile, @DBMotorsports (The Seller) clarified details regarding the vehicle's freshwater usage and maintenance requirements, addressing potential buyers' concerns about saltwater corrosion sometimes found in similar vehicles.
Negative: Not all comments were wholly positive, with some expressing reservations. @bkrug noted a lack of a live well, indicating a concern regarding fishing capabilities. Additionally, @nathanerx7 mentioned wanting to see demonstration videos that highlight the vehicle's features more comprehensively, suggesting the initial videos were too brief to provide a complete view.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz praised the Bronco as a magnificent maroon vehicle, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @fastsedans (The Seller) expressed appreciation for the compliment and welcomed any questions from potential buyers.
Neutral: @msheldonsb inquired about the engine specifications and the possibility of fitting doors and a hard top for winter use. In response, @fastsedans (The Seller) detailed that the 302 engine was rebuilt in 2023, with additional features such as headers and mild cam, and confirmed that hard doors and tops could be fitted as no structural changes were made during modifications.
Negative: There were no negative comments from the participants regarding the vehicle. The conversation remained focused on its features, potential modifications, and shipping logistics, with no criticisms noted.
23-Years-Owned 1994 Saab 900 Turbo Convertible Commemorative Edition 5-Speed
YS3AL75TXR7008398
Lot 188957
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments reflect a strong appreciation for the Saab 900 Convertible, with @AlohaZ3 describing it as a 'Bjorn Beauty' perfect for summer adventures. @CJO4RUNNER shared nostalgia about their own Saab experience, highlighting the joy and quality of the vehicles, emphasizing the connection with the brand's aviation heritage. @Tigers196884 even referred to it as the 'Holy Grail of Saab’s,' exemplifying the high regard within the Saab community for this model.
Neutral: Some comments raise questions about a seemingly unrelated article included by BaT, with @boblupe agreeing with @jbk23 that it felt odd for a different generation of vehicle to be referenced. @laissezfaire (The Seller) provided insights about the car's service history and ownership but expressed confusion regarding the relevance of the article in the context of the listing. Additionally, the seller confirmed the production number of the convertible model, providing transparency in the auction process.
Negative: On the negative side, @JIMMY pointed out the challenge of sourcing parts for an older Saab, advising that while basic maintenance items are still available, more specific needs might require a dedicated Saab parts provider. @boblupe reminisced about parts availability in the past and expressed concern about the current challenges owners face in maintaining these classic vehicles. @Edvert noted improvements in parts availability over the last decade, yet acknowledged the need for patience in obtaining certain parts.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) highlights the vehicle's excellent care, noting that it has been owned by a private individual for over four years who maintained it meticulously, only driving it on sunny days. The seller also emphasizes their commitment to transparency, offering to answer questions and providing access to extensive documentation including 300 pictures and videos showcasing the car's condition. The team is described as a high-volume seller focused on customer satisfaction, boasting a high Google Reviews rating of 4.9/5.0, which indicates a strong reputation for quality service.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the vehicle's history, with @Dr-t mentioning that it has had five previous owners, which raises questions about its turnover rate and reliability. @no.radar notes that the vehicle has been sold at auto auctions twice, but does not provide details on the auction sites or prices, as the Carfax report lacks that information. @jspinzig inquires about an inspection report and details concerning the vehicle's paint condition, reflecting interest in thorough evaluations but without any definitive responses from the seller.
Negative: Concerns emerge regarding the vehicle's history with multiple owners, as @Dr-t specifically points out the high turnover of five owners without explanations. @no.radar also raises a red flag by mentioning the car's past sales at auto auctions, which may imply underlying issues or desirability problems. The inquiries from @jspinzig about potential bodywork, paint meter readings, and visible flaws indicate skepticism about the vehicle's overall condition, suggesting that potential buyers may need further reassurances before committing.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @autokeith (The Seller) highlights that the 2005 Jeep Wrangler Sport is in great shape both inside and out, emphasizing its excellent running condition. Several commenters, including @FalconFlyer, express their admiration for the vehicle's appearance, with @BWJones specifically noting the impressively clean underside, a rare find in non-new Jeeps. @autokeith also provides reassurance about the vehicle's maintenance history, showcasing the extensive repairs and upgrades performed to ensure it's ready for adventures, which adds to the overall appeal of the listing.
Neutral: Commenters have shown curiosity about the vehicle's restoration details. @BWilson39 inquires about the frame and skid plate coating, and whether it was part of a frame-off restoration. @autokeith responds by detailing the work done to treat minor surface rust and resealing the frame with protective coatings, also offering photos from before the restoration for comparison.
Negative: While there are no explicitly negative comments regarding the vehicle, questions about its undercarriage and any potential rust or restoration work underline a general concern for transparency on vehicle condition. @BWilson39 asks for further pictures and details about the body and frame, indicating a desire for more information to assess the vehicle's full history, reflecting caution among potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting the uniquely low mileage, which adds to its allure. @JetCity993RS remarked on the car's surprisingly low miles and indicated curiosity about its history, showing appreciation for the well-maintained interior. Additionally, @louist complimented the Targa's attractiveness and noted how it checks many boxes for potential buyers, making it quite tempting. @TurboDad also chimed in with praise, mentioning his liking for the sugar scoops on the model, further indicating a strong interest in the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters sought additional information about the vehicle's specifications and history. @carlheizer asked about the process needed for the car to pass California emissions testing, while @Dwait (The Seller) addressed concerns about the car's registration in Montana and its compliance with smog regulations. Commenters like @kkchangi expressed interest in the vehicle's physical condition, inquiring about rust and engine integrity. @Caymanorcarrera voiced doubts about the factory installation of the rear spoiler, which @Dwait (The Seller) responded to with claims of the spoiler's originality and condition, aiming to clarify its specifications.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's history and potential hidden issues due to limited maintenance records. @BBone33 pointed out the challenges of verifying mileage due to previous registrations and suggested that the lack of records might pose a risk for potential buyers. Additionally, @KerberosLPM requested more detailed images of the car's underbody, implying a need for transparency about its condition, while @Dwait (The Seller) noted the absence of a driving video, which some feel is necessary for a thorough evaluation. Overall, these comments reflect some skepticism about the car's history and condition despite its appeal.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance and features. @Guinness1963 appreciated the vehicle's emissions compatibility with California regulations, which @Engineered confirmed promptly. @rjcp1 complimented the lovely shade of saddle brown, while @WCDM noted the SUV as one of their favorites, referencing a memorable quote from Jeremy Clarkson about its speed and performance. Additionally, @JSol24 and others praised the elegant interior and overall aesthetic appeal of the car.
Neutral: Several questions and clarifications were sought about specifics related to the vehicle's service and import conditions. @mcsleepy asked about potential work on the transfer case, to which @Engineered indicated there have been no issues reported. @mundomatt inquired about the coolant added in March 2025 and how much the vehicle was driven since then, highlighting potential buyer concerns about the vehicle's condition. Additionally, there were several inquiries regarding import tariffs, with @Engineered acknowledging the uncertainty surrounding additional costs.
Negative: There were minimal negative comments, but some users raised concerns about the vehicle's features and service history. @P0802253 expressed uncertainty over whether the vehicle had PDCC, and although @Engineered confirmed its presence, the initial confusion noted a gap in the information provided. @rlhug1954 pointed out a possible issue with the speedometer, indicating it was showing kilometers per hour instead of miles per hour, which could be a concern for potential buyers regarding the instrument's functionality.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the car, highlighting its aesthetics and power. @Andyp referred to it as 'pretty cool' and noted its origins in the same city it was sold, while @Calstickshift mentioned that the car looks much better without the rear wing. @AlohaZ3 called it an 'utter beast of a Mach 1' and suggested its suitability for drag racing. @Gopher428 and others appreciated its factory dragstrip-ready configuration, including its original 428 Super Cobra Jet designation and the unique combination of options that makes it a standout.
Neutral: The discussion included several inquiries about the details of the car, indicating a collaborative effort to clarify its specifications. @shelbymann70 and others raised concerns regarding the engine description and potential discrepancies in the listing, such as whether the car features a 428 SCJ or a CJ. Several comments requested additional photographs of specific parts like the servo cover, oil pan gasket area, and other components crucial for bidders’ confidence about the vehicle’s condition. The seller, @loudonmotorsford, was responsive to these queries, promising to provide the necessary images and updates.
Negative: Some commenters expressed skepticism about the seller's claims, particularly regarding the vehicle's condition and modifications. @Stoneguy44 pointed out inaccuracies about the engine rebuild dates, while @shelbymann70 sought clarity on missing parts like the original 4.30 gears, which were confirmed not to be included with the vehicle. Concerns were raised by @Boss302Fan and others regarding the challenges of verifying certain components, leading to a lively debate about the authenticity and modifications of the car. Additionally, some worried about the car's value and whether it was being accurately represented in the current auction context.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Brian50 expressed delight at the presence of another appealing TR6 on the auction site, wishing the seller luck. @Odink9 described the vehicle as a beauty, emphasizing its attractiveness. @KenRockwell praised the lead photo for its outstanding quality, noting that it showcases the car in a joyful environment. @Nien11 shared their admiration for the vehicle, hoping that the reserve price would not discourage potential buyers. @ima68tr complimented the car as a well-preserved specimen that is ready to be enjoyed, indicating its positive state.
Neutral: @Rich_Truett raised a concern regarding the emissions system that has been stripped from the engine, suggesting that it might pose issues for registration in California. @fordfiesta added context about potential changes to smog laws that could affect the vehicle's ability to be registered in California. @YTJohn questioned @Bulletmotorsportsinc about the light grey coating on the frame, inquiring whether it serves as rust protection. @groceg mentioned the removal of overdrive from the car and speculated on the implications of the California legislative changes affecting smog requirements.
Negative: @Marshall15 noted potential issues with the car, suggesting possible tire rub damage and questioning the presence of rust or bondo in certain photos. @muddymogriffin asked about the drawbacks of the rear tube shock conversion and how the removal of smog equipment might affect performance, indicating concerns about whether driving experience would be significantly improved. @ima68tr shared doubts about the authenticity of the performance claims made in the auction video, pointing out discrepancies about gear ratios with stock components. Overall, these comments reflect concerns and scrutiny regarding the vehicle's condition and compliance with regulations.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @sheepster (The Seller) mentioned that the car has been serviced by Porsche and provided an invoice for it, indicating that no issues have arisen during their ownership. Additionally, @sheepster confirmed that the original rear deck lid will be included with the sale, and they have shown the car to interested parties, suggesting transparency and willingness to engage with potential buyers. @Vr00m also expressed gratitude for the explanation regarding the mileage, appreciating the clarity provided by the seller, indicating a positive atmosphere around the discussion.
Neutral: Several comments raised valid questions about the vehicle's condition, such as its dustiness in pictures and requests for more detailed images of the undercarriage due to its time spent in New York. @MCwbc82 inquired about the original deck lid and the possibility of seeing the underside of the car, while @gmoorefrombiltmore questioned the ride height that seemed higher than expected. @mistuhwest asked about the car's storage conditions and whether it had been exposed to water, which the seller addressed calmly, maintaining a neutral stance on the concerns raised by commenters.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition were evident, with @megatron991 pointing out that the radio displays "CODE", suggesting potential functionality issues, and @red_ben inquiring about possible rust bubbles and oil leaks around the windshield. @vonmec noted corrosion on some hardware in the pictures, asking for reassurance about the vehicle's overall condition. @GeminiKoi criticized the car's filthy appearance, which detracted from the listing's appeal and may have caused hesitation among potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @JP20979 (The Seller) describes the vehicle as extremely reliable, stating that the winning bidder will definitely enjoy it. This positive affirmation about its consistency and dependability reassures potential buyers of the truck's performance.
Neutral: @JP20979 (The Seller) addresses questions from interested bidders. He confirms that the check engine light is not on, and that the truck passed smog tests without issues roughly a year and a half ago. He also provides information about the rims after being asked by @Atomic11, clarifying their brand is uncertain but was changed prior to his purchase.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by commenters. @HighDesert75 inquires about the presence of a check engine light, revealing a potential worry for buyers about the truck's mechanical condition. Additionally, @GAMcKenzie asks about any issues engaging 4-wheel drive, indicative of a common concern among truck buyers regarding off-road functionality.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Tvsmark highlighted the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, referring to it as a "very nice looking clean disco." @boxster03 complemented it by labeling it as a "fantastic mall crawler," indicating that it has practical uses beyond off-road capabilities. Additionally, @SmithVolvo (The Seller) reassured potential buyers by discussing the car's original paint, correcting the Carfax report to note it as a damage report rather than an accident, and promising to provide a video demonstrating the paint meter.
Neutral: Comments from @gmoney4005 inquired about the vehicle's suitability for camping, specifically questioning whether the back seats can be removed completely or folded down. @ski.dive requested information about the vehicle passing California smog before sale, which @SmithVolvo confirmed, stating it’s a one-owner California Disco and will include a smog. Furthermore, @IMD requested further clarification about accident repairs and oil change frequency, with the seller addressing these inquiries and stating the limitations of records available, such as the absence of service documents.
Negative: Concerns were raised by several users about potential mechanical issues. @kriskrispy asked about active power steering leaks and the condition of the front suspension, while @ck1710 inquired whether common issues like head gasket problems had been addressed. @IMD and @kriskrispy both voiced concerns regarding the vehicle's mileage discrepancies, with @kriskrispy noting varying figures on Carfax. Also, @ulm87 requested high-quality footage of the vehicle to clearly display paint imperfections, particularly on the hood and roof, indicating potential quality issues that buyers might want more information on.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters admire the vehicle, describing it as a very pretty car with a classic design, particularly praising its coke bottle styling and distinctive Pontiac front end. @Idavidsheldon highlights its beauty compared to a Chevelle, while @Craven appreciates the chrome beak, smooth hood, and Lemans emblems, commenting on the refreshing aesthetics of the car. Others, like @MikesGarage and @boaboyoz, emphasize the overall quality and impressive presentation of this example, with @MikesGarage noting it as a rare find among its contemporaries. @LumberjackGlenn, the seller, provides insights about the car's history and restoration, citing its California roots and desirable features that contribute to its appeal.
Neutral: Several comments engage in technical discussions regarding the differences between the 1968 and 1969 models. @GSL535XI shares personal anecdotes about their memories linked to their own first car, a 1969 model, showing a nostalgic connection while also seeking clarification on design distinctions. @maj75 highlights specific differences in bumpers and interior styling, providing a more detailed comparison. Commenters also appreciate the visual details of the car, including the wheels, but express varying opinions on aesthetic choices, such as the front bumper fit, with @BucksRealtor noting a gap between the front bumper and fender, indicating a desire for operational clarity.
Negative: Some comments touch upon minor issues of design and functionality, with @BucksRealtor questioning the fit of the front bumper, suggesting it may need adjustment, and adding a tone of concern over the vehicle's aesthetics. @Nytrainer engages in a back-and-forth discussion about the materials used in parts of the car, indicating some disagreement over technical details, which furthers a sense of skepticism towards certain qualities of the vehicle. Additionally, the comment flagged as non-constructive by @Nytrainer points to potential tensions within the discussions, underscoring varying levels of interest and investment in the specifics of the vehicle's design and condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning aesthetics and overall desirability. @securebid992 noted the photos gave off a 'cyberpunk vibe' which was appealing. @ykmini mentioned the car's impressive history, indicating that its start in Japan and the diligence shown by the original owner in maintaining service stamps were significant positives. @Tnbusiness71 and @mightydave echoed these sentiments, praising the beauty of the vehicle and the character of the owner, indicating trustworthiness in a classic car purchase.
Neutral: Several comments provided useful information regarding the car's specifications and history. @fastandcurious (The Seller) clarified the import process for vehicles over 25 years old, explaining specific exemptions from tariffs and regulations that would ease the process for U.S. bidders. Additionally, the seller addressed @ykmini's inquiries about the mufflers and shocks, confirming they are not leaking and are in operational condition despite some cosmetic wear. They also described the car's handling and suspension adjustments, which helps paint a clear picture of the vehicle's performance.
Negative: Some concerns arose regarding potential issues with the vehicle. @ykmini questioned the state of the rear shocks and the possibility of rust, and @Randyrocker inquired about sunroof functionality and leakage, pointing out common issues associated with the E31 model. @MountRoyal speculated whether the right front quarter panel may have been repainted, raising doubts about the car's history. Although the seller provided reassurances, these comments suggest some wariness about the vehicle's past conditions and repairs.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @brock.alford describes the ST90 as a gorgeous and clean bike, expressing a fondness for it and considering a purchase if it had a title for street riding. @Vette2 comments on the bike's original paint and tires, noting its rarity as it was only made for three years. The bike is appreciated for its tight shifting and low mileage, indicating that it's well-maintained. @107semo (The Seller) expresses appreciation for the interest in the classic Honda and emphasizes its value as a great little bike.
Neutral: @Ben_stevens inquires about the originality of the paint, seeking confirmation regarding its authenticity. @tehNiemer engages in the discussion about the specifics of the bike, showing curiosity about its history and current condition. @jaylen1999 questions whether this bike is the same one sold previously in Georgia, which suggests a connection with the vehicle's past ownership.
Negative: There are no notably negative comments regarding the vehicle. The discussions primarily focus on its features and history without any adverse feedback or concerns highlighted by the commenters.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @bostonaudi shares a positive experience with BMW, noting the company even came to his house to replace the Takata steering wheel airbags. @Speedy4 chimes in, expressing admiration for the vehicle, saying that despite having a similar car with higher mileage, he hopes the car in question sells well due to its quality and performance. @Iceman7 (The Seller) also highlights that the car is in '100% perfect mechanical conditions' and that it retains its original paint and has no accidents, aiming to convey confidence in the vehicle's quality.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Htown86er and @ProKay, seek clarification about maintenance and the condition of specific components such as the Vanos and rear subframe. @Speaks911 mentions noticing a few service receipts but raises questions about the gaps in oil changes. In response, @Iceman7 (The Seller) promises to provide more detailed information and service history, although he is currently out of state, which complicates the process of obtaining immediate records and images.
Negative: Despite @Iceman7's assurances about the vehicle's condition, there are multiple concerns raised by different users. @ProKay highlights that there are 'too many unknowns' regarding the maintenance history, particularly concerning the significant gaps between services. @Htown86er also directly questions whether specific critical issues, like those associated with the Vanos and rear subframe, have been addressed, indicating potential doubts about the vehicle's overall reliability.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @PDXBryan praised the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle, noting that "Gold Wings on wires are so cool!" @GLWTA,stugottz recalled enjoying a smooth ride on a similar bike, describing it as an "awesome machine." @GLWTA,imanut2 commended the bike as a beautiful example of a naked G-WING, stating the early GL1000s are versatile, being nimble in urban settings yet capable of highway travel. They mentioned their personal experience with a ’76 GL1000, highlighting the bike's maintenance ease and the potential for customization, which showcases the bike's adaptability.
Neutral: @Mauryh (The Seller) explained that the previous buyer was unable to complete the purchase, leading him to keep the bike longer. He clarified that the timing belts were last replaced in 2017 and have seen around 4,250 miles since then. Discussions among commentors included questions about the need for repairs and maintenance practices, with @rofandofy questioning why head gaskets were needed at such low mileage, to which @Mauryh (The Seller) responded that he preemptively worked on the motor without necessity.
Negative: Tensions arose when @trailerjoe was flagged for posting an unrelated ad during @Mauryh (The Seller)'s auction, leading to an exchange regarding the ethics of his actions. @Mauryh (The Seller) expressed strong disapproval, asking for removal while @trailerjoe acknowledged the conflict and apologized. Additionally, comments such as @karlcpo's suggested that despite the bike's beauty, attention to age-related maintenance (like replacing belts) is crucial, highlighting concerns about the vehicle's overall condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg highlighted the exceptionally low mileage of just 6,800 on the 1982 Mercedes-Benz 380SL, suggesting it might be the lowest mile example in existence. @MilleMiglia expressed love for the car's color, calling it a beauty. @ScottOnTheRocks praised the interior and noted how much easier the 380s are to live with compared to the earlier models. The pictures have been appreciated, with @GDogg complimenting the quality of images provided by @sunrisesports18009, the seller. Overall, the car is seen as a unique piece with significant appeal for enthusiasts.
Neutral: Comments indicate some curiosity regarding the car's maintenance records and original paint. @smaconi requested confirmation of the original paint, which @sunrisesports18009 confirmed. @Palgeorge raised concerns about the wear and tear visible in the interior and exterior despite the low mileage, including mentioning some rust issues inferred from the detailed photos. These comments reflect a mix of itemized interest and caution about the vehicle's condition overall, particularly in the context of its age and mileage.
Negative: Concerns surfaced regarding the vehicle's condition from multiple commentators. @Rotors indicated that despite the low mileage, the vehicle requires new rubber parts and full servicing due to neglected maintenance. @badali noted visible rust in critical areas like the suspension and brake booster, contradicting the expectations for a car boasting such low mileage. @aafshar expressed skepticism about the authenticity of the mileage based on wear observed on the driver's seat. @Walraven simply dismissed the car's brown color as undesirable, reflecting a broader negativity regarding the overall presentation of the vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Beans_Bacon expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, indicating a strong appreciation for its design. @Redd also commends the build quality, showing interest in specific features like the wheels and their unique style. @Pmort (The Seller) emphasizes the extensive overhaul that the car has undergone, outlining the new engine and transmission work which reflects a commitment to quality and detail.
Neutral: @Mainlymuscle raises a question about the vehicle's design, comparing it to an early AWD shark concept, but acknowledges some nice improvements. @Ronson68L78 and @johnnyvett engage in a discussion about the transmission, with @Chefgordiemac noting that the car appears to sit a bit high but also recognizes its potential. The height clarification provided by @Pmort (The Seller) suggests that the ride height is stock, helping to address concerns from potential bidders.
Negative: @Chefgordiemac's comment about the vehicle sitting high hints at a perception issue, which may deter some buyers. Furthermore, @Ronson68L78's inquiry about the TH transmission indicates a level of confusion or concern about compatibility and specifications, reflecting a potential negative impression regarding the vehicle's mechanical setup. Overall, while there is strong interest, some comments suggest the vehicle's design elements may not resonate with everyone, and there might be concerns about its height and technical specifications.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the car's classic appeal, with @Bobbity noting that it raises their pulse a little, and @revron describing it as a rare opportunity to purchase a classic Porsche at an affordable price. @RyanJustRyan appreciates the vehicle's enjoyable driving experience, stating that they prefer it over a show car they would hesitate to drive. @rikhowe (The Seller) confirmed that the car is mechanically solid, starts easily, and runs smoothly, highlighting that it is licensed, insured, and can serve as a daily driver with only minor adjustments needed.
Neutral: Several commenters requested information and clarifications about the vehicle's condition. @paulsunseri asked if the A/C works, to which @CliffElam responded with concerns about the left window and disconnected heater hose. @ChangitoBoy and @No_Substitute requested specific photos to assess the car's corrosion and rust areas. @Robert1234 inquired about maintenance receipts, which @rikhowe (The Seller) promised to provide upon return, alongside additional photographs of the car's interior and structural areas.
Negative: There were some significant concerns raised by commenters regarding the vehicle's condition. @CliffElam mentioned the left window being broken, which could be problematic, and @H8Excuses questioned the replacement engine's cam issue. @rikhowe (The Seller) disclosed that the car originally had A/C but it was never installed on the current engine and has issues with the windows and electrical components needing troubleshooting. Additionally, @rikhowe (The Seller) admitted that some restoration efforts were halted due to downsizing, which raises concerns about the overall completion of necessary repairs.
Single-Family-Owned 35k-Mile 1988 Alfa Romeo Spider Graduate
ZARBA5640J1062397
Lot 188980
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the beauty and maintenance of the Alfa Romeo Graduate. @Odink9 expressed a desire to drive the car across the country, highlighting its appeal, while @lhcamacho noted its well-maintained condition and sought confirmation on the original mileage. The seller, @td52, echoed these sentiments by thanking everyone for the kind words and confirming the car's 35k original miles, reinforcing its attractiveness to potential buyers. Additionally, @Arekusan shared his positive experiences with the Alfa Spiders, further promoting the vehicle as a joyful ride rather than a racing machine.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarifications about the car, including the functionality of its air conditioning. @alyron pointed out that the control knob suggested the presence of an AC unit, which led @td52 to respond with uncertainty about its current operability. Furthermore, questions about the car's shifting mechanics were raised, with @neilv asking about the need for double-clutching, and @td52 providing insights into the car's shifting requirements, noting that it requires a gentle touch. @Watry also added context regarding the nature of Alfa transmissions, which was well received by @Arekusan.
Negative: On the other hand, some concerns were raised regarding potential issues with the vehicle. @jrn911sc questioned the absence of power windows as listed and inquired about possible rust, while @lampyy pointed out maintenance records that showed previous work done to address rust and sought details about the vehicle's storage conditions during its time in Maine. Additionally, the car's history regarding a dent on the passenger side was brought into question, prompting a candid response from @td52 about the cause.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its appeal and craftsmanship, with @SimplexFish calling it the "Jethro Bodine mobile" and expressing love for it, while @Blofish praises the attention to detail. @Dollycat3 and @OldHippie both resonate with the charm of the camper, with the latter suggesting it only requires a couple of chairs and wine for a perfect evening. @TessieB finds it incredible, and @Rye356b appreciates the labor of love that went into restoring the trailer, encouraging others to bid with 'Good Luck with the Auction'. @BarrettS admires the beautiful restoration and the mix of vintage upgrades, reinforcing the appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and functionality.
Neutral: The seller, @Retro1, provides frequent updates and answers questions about the trailer. He clarifies the situation regarding the previous auction in January, mentioning that the vehicle did not sell due to an unmet reserve. Additionally, he responds to inquiries about the trailer's dimensions and specifics about features like the bed size and the absence of brakes, emphasizing the trailer's lightweight design. Other users, such as @H47cars and @Gerardv, engage with practical queries about the trailer's structure and potential use. The conversation reflects a mix of curiosity and engagement about the trailer’s features and operational capabilities.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns regarding the design and construction of the vehicle. @BarrerrS questions the choice of materials used in the trailer's flooring and the treatment of exposed wood, suggesting potential issues with water intrusion. @burbank36 inquires about the lack of brakes, indicating a concern about safety. Also, @Ypss36 refers to the limitations of the trailer's small size for camping trips in cooler weather. @volvoracer9 expresses hesitancy due to the absence of a bathroom, pointing out a drawback for modern campers, reflecting on the historical aspect of lacking plumbing in older models.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is described as a beautiful and elegant Phantom, with @Dollycat3 praising its stunning color combination and commanding presence. @lincolnsandcaddies agrees, noting that while the car is above their pay grade, it is indeed awesome. The luxurious and classic appeal of the Phantom is echoed by several commenters who appreciate its history and rarity, with special mentions of notable events like "The Great Eight Phantoms" gathering.
Neutral: The seller, @autocentroimports, provided useful information regarding the vehicle's specifications and condition, addressing several inquiries from potential buyers. They confirmed the inclusion of original manuals, keys, and a battery tender, responding to questions about missing items with clarity. Additional driving videos were promised to showcase the Phantom under different road conditions, ensuring potential bidders have all the information they need to make an informed decision.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's features and operational aspects, with @berfinroy critiquing the power reserve gauge as being unnecessary. @MMhomegroup pointed out excessive cabin noise during a driving video, speculating it was due to road quality, which is unusual for a Phantom. Queries about the condition of the suspension further highlighted potential buyer apprehensions, with @MarlonBrando asking for clarifications on its functionality.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @637Bubblehead describes the vehicle as a nice little workhorse, reflecting a generally favorable view of its utility. @tbillet also confirms the seller's capability in providing parts quickly, indicating a reliable service experience. @JapanMotors, the seller, reassures @637Bubblehead about parts availability and the vehicle's capacity, further supporting the positive sentiments surrounding the vehicle's functionality and support.
Neutral: @tbillet suggests checking previous auctions by @seller to find answers related to parts availability and common issues, which presents a straightforward approach to potential concerns. This comment neither praises nor criticizes the vehicle, but rather seeks to provide practical information.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle in the provided feedback. All comments reflect an overall positive or neutral perspective, focusing on the vehicle's capabilities and the seller's reliability.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Norton Atlas, highlighting its classic beauty and the unique riding experience it offers. @DaveD described it as a 'lovely example' of the final Featherbed Norton, praising its comfortable ride and the pleasing sound it produces. @drailer noted how fun it is to drive, with the power to outpace other contemporaries like the Bonneville. @halcyonmotors confirmed its excellent condition after 50 miles of spirited riding, emphasizing the bike's solid handling and the nostalgia it evokes for passionate bikers. Several users, including @59cushman and @JDarby, shared their own fond nostalgia related to the Norton, reinforcing the bike's stature in motorcycle history.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the bike's condition and history with a balanced perspective. @kerowako, who serviced the machine, noted its original and unmolested state, while @AZRoadrunner pointed out specific details about the 1967 model and questioned the authenticity of some colors. @halcyonmotors acknowledged the possibility of a repaint but maintained that the bike has a noteworthy provenance. Discussions about the mileage on the odometer introduced some speculation, with @halcyonmotors elaborating on the bike's story and its previous ownership by Phil Radford, a well-regarded figure in the Norton community, while also suggesting that the low mileage could be plausible under certain circumstances.
Negative: A few concerns were raised regarding the bike's condition and history. @Bswan questioned whether there were service records available given the previous owner's lengthy tenure with the bike. Moreover, there were inquiries about potential damage to the front fender, suggesting that minor cosmetic issues could detract from the overall appeal. @AZRoadrunner and others raised questions about the accuracy of color claims from different sources, hinting at the potential confusion surrounding repainted bikes in the market. While these issues were addressed, they indicate that while the Atlas is a beloved classic, its history might come with some uncertainties.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the vehicle, with @Beans_Bacon calling it 'amazing' and feeling it would make for a fun week. @MissyLynnZilla conveyed a strong emotional response, stating, 'I think I’m in love 🤩.' @boaboyoz and @tlcamg referred to the vehicle as a 'ridiculous build' and 'insane,' respectively, while @shumdit humorously mentioned it would be great for 'date night with my sister.' Overall, there was a sense of positivity and thrill surrounding the unique features and modifications of the vehicle, with several commenters eager to see it in action and mention its appeal for fun, attention, and unique experiences.
Neutral: Several commenters noted the unconventional nature of the vehicle and its modifications. @jdv1745 and @Crovet both pointed out a lack of noticeable modifications despite the seller’s claims, with @Piros1 questioning the legality of driving it without additional modifications in most states. @Boocho provided context by detailing the vehicle's backstory as a movie prop built by Jesse James, further drawing interest. Meanwhile, @Boocho and @UncleSamsTrenchGun shared insights about additional safety features and components, suggesting its usefulness beyond just aesthetics, while @Wylie702 raised concerns about the quality of the welds seen in images.
Negative: Some commenters expressed skepticism regarding the practicality and functionality of the vehicle. @Piros1 suggested it might be better suited to parting out rather than daily use, hinting at regulatory hurdles for street use. @moneybags remarked that it wasn't loud enough for their taste, indicating that not everyone appreciated the performance aspect. @RedRacer454 raised the notion that the cops might object to driving it, linking to the potential liabilities of street legality. Overall, while there was considerable enthusiasm, there were also practical concerns about its use and necessary upgrades.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Showga praises the RAV4, calling it one of the best vehicles available and highlighting this particular model as a beautiful option. @David_P shares a positive personal experience with a similar vehicle, recalling an impressive road trip in Malawi and noting the RAV4's capability in tough terrains. @Jdmpower7 (The Seller) mentions that the vehicle has cold A/C and well-maintained exterior paint, rated 8/10, enhancing the vehicle's appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: @solopassenger inquires about the presence of a center diff lock, while @AmosStutz questions the operability of the a/c and the originality of the tires. @IsAlwaystheAnswer seeks more photographic evidence related to the spare tire and oil change receipts, reflecting a desire for thorough transparency about the vehicle's maintenance history. @Ktownie requests pictures of the back seats in different configurations, showing interest in the vehicle's functionality.
Negative: @IsAlwaystheAnswer raises concerns about the potential oil sludge issues associated with the 2.0L Toyota engines, expressing caution. @2nd2none asks about any noticeable dents, oil leaks, and the overall condition of the paint, suggesting that there may be underlying issues to consider. Additionally, @MikeNoLomotel's question about the specifics of the brake service indicates a concern over the vehicle's maintenance, emphasizing the need for clarity on what "brakes" entails.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments praise the truck for its classic design and functionality. @K51020Ranch describes it as a "brown beauty" with heavy-duty capabilities, while @e9er highlights the appealing wheel and tire combination. The earlier grill is a noted aesthetic plus, with @Gmmuscleusa mentioning its importance for the truck's look. @DBG1973 reflects on the truck's rarity and durability, loving the nostalgic memories associated with these square bodies, and suggests that the new owner will be very happy with this one. @XXX79 recalls a personal connection to a similar truck, emphasizing its workhorse reputation and overall beauty.
Neutral: Several comments provide useful information about the truck, particularly regarding its features and current condition. @WCD2020 (The Seller) has been active in responding to inquiries, clarifying the truck's specifications and repair history, including the original factory invoice and the restoration work. There are questions from other commentators regarding the truck, such as @Ortsac3159 inquiring about missing components, while @JDRealty asks about the wheels. The seller's responses indicate transparency and readiness to provide further details, which is appreciated by some respondents.
Negative: However, not all feedback is positive. @rmoudry raises concerns about the condition of the gauges and the appearance of the gauge cluster, suggesting that it looks like it came from a truck that had been submerged. Moreover, @craftworx expresses caution about the truck's reliability for long trips given its age, prompting a reflective reply from @WCD2020 (The Seller) about the uncertainties of driving a nearly 50-year-old vehicle long distances. Such concerns hint at the potential issues buyers may need to address, despite the overall enthusiasm for the truck.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Jensen125 (The Seller) expresses excitement about the vehicle, describing it as a beautiful time capsule with a low mileage of just 93 miles. @johnnyvett also endorses the Bricklin, suggesting that if someone wants a Bricklin, this is the one to purchase, wishing good luck to the eventual winner. @Raquila47 provides historical context, mentioning the quality of the AMC 360 CI engine as preferable among the two engines used during production, further reinforcing the desirability of this specific model.
Neutral: Several commenters discuss the vehicle's specifications and maintenance history. @SRTman inquires about the factory 4-speed feature, which @Jensen125 confirms. @MikeP2882 asks about the presence of a reserve and notes the '76 console, to which @Jensen125 responds with acknowledgment. There are comments regarding the vehicle's relisting due to a previous buyer's extenuating circumstances, and @jka73 mentions the importance of accountability among bidders, indicating concerns about potential non-compliance within the auction environment.
Negative: There are some concerns and criticisms raised in the comments regarding the sale process. @jka73 highlights issues surrounding a previous high bidder who did not complete the sale, expressing hope for strict consequences for such actions to maintain integrity on the platform. @CALI_Dreaming questions the authenticity of the tail light panel and hints at possible prior repairs, which @Jensen125 denies by stating that the car has all original components. These comments point to some skepticism about the vehicle's condition and the auction process itself.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a generally positive sentiment towards the vehicle being sold. @nucleus describes it as 'barely driven' and 'beautiful', suggesting strong visual appeal and low mileage. @MBHAuto (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting its excellent condition and inviting potential buyers to ask questions. @JGraham notes the opportunity to acquire a 'brand new 18 year old Mercedes for not a lot of money' and compliments the car's aesthetics.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding specific features of the vehicle, which @MBHAuto (The Seller) addressed directly. @leestar asked about the air-ride system but learned that the car does not have an Airmatic system. @thorson54 inquired about the presence of a 6 CD changer, which was confirmed by the seller. Additionally, @KenHurder raised a question about recalls, to which the seller assured that they had been completed, directing him to supporting photos for verification.
Negative: There are minimal negative comments, but @jndaniell questioned the reasons behind the vehicle being relisted. The seller clarified that the previous auction did not meet the reserve, indicating that there may have been issues with initial interest or bidding. This could suggest concerns regarding the vehicle's overall desirability or pricing, highlighting a cautious perspective among some potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Users have expressed commendation for the seller @madecicco and the meticulous maintenance the vehicle has undergone, as highlighted in the service reports shared in the auction listing. @madecicco's willingness to answer questions and provide detailed service records has been appreciated, with emphasis on the fact that the car has been well-maintained and stored in a garage, which adds to its appeal. Overall, there is a sense of encouragement shown by commenters wishing the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: Several commenters have engaged in discussions regarding import tariffs for vehicles, particularly discussing the potential application of a 25% tariff for cars under 25 years old, as noted by @Miniotis2. The seller, @madecicco, has apologized for the initial confusion regarding the auction being labeled as no-reserve when it actually had a reserve. The comments indicate that while the maintenance history is documented, there are multiple inquiries about specific repairs, particularly related to the cylinder head, showing a range of interests among bidders.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's history, specifically the replacement of the cylinder head cover mentioned by @MoreCarsPlease, which could imply past issues. @FredRSmith pointed out potential miscommunication about the repairs, indicating that further clarification might have been necessary. Additionally, @Wrigley61 expressed frustration about the bidding process not having a maximum bid feature, which could hinder participation from those unable to be at their computer constantly.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the capabilities of the Touareg, highlighting its suitability for towing as evidenced by @essjayarr, who notes its excellent towing capacity and shares satisfaction with their own ownership experience. @flipphones admires the vehicle's clean appearance and unique color combination, suggesting that the Touareg is worth its asking price and potentially more. @IMissMySaab shares a positive experience using their TDI for towing, further emphasizing the vehicle's robust capabilities.
Neutral: @LongiMotorsports (The Seller) provides detailed information about the vehicle's specifications and maintenance status, indicating that it shares parts with the Cayenne Diesel and Q7 TDI, and clarifying the confusion about the model's internal designation. Several users offer clarifications on terminology, such as @campodf explaining the '7P' reference, and @essjayarr correcting the listing regarding passenger capacity. @rustyrotors raises a question about the condition of the passenger seat, to which the seller responds assuring that it's just a scratch without any tears.
Negative: Some issues were raised regarding the auction and listing process, with @campodf criticizing the inclusion of an outdated article related to a different model, suggesting poor editing practices. @packardv8 expresses skepticism about the credibility of the listings, insinuating that the creators may be incompetent due to ongoing misapplications of road test data. Additionally, @rustyrotors questions the authenticity of the sale, noting a document fee that raises suspicions about the legitimacy of the dealer status.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the nostalgic value and unique appeal of the vehicle. @mkekiddoc expresses fond memories of driving a similar model in the '80s, describing it as a fun car despite its low horsepower. @CarFoolLane shares a fun fact about its original design, which adds depth to its historical significance. Commenters like @AndyL and @Valiantjim agree on the potential for a drivetrain swap, emphasizing the car's lightweight nature and sleeper appeal. The seller, @RanTrac, shares a sentimental story about the vehicle's history within his family, which resonates with others who recount their own experiences with the Monza.
Neutral: The discussion also includes practical aspects about the car's specifications and historical context. @Mordizzle and @NorCalBert discuss GM's Wankel engine program and its impact on the Monza's engine lineup, indicating a shared interest in automotive history. Additionally, @binderguy52 recalls his time working at a Chevy dealer and provides insights into challenges mechanics faced with the Monza's V8 engines, stirring further conversation on maintenance practices. Overall, commenters exchange interesting facts and experiences related to the Monza, showcasing its significance in automotive culture.
Negative: On the downside, not all feedback is entirely positive. Some commenters reflect on the mechanical challenges associated with the vehicle, with @binderguy52 noting the difficulty of changing spark plugs in the V8 model, which could be a deterrent for potential buyers. @mike_rockwell misidentification of the vehicle type suggests a lack of awareness among some users about the distinctions between the Monza and Vega, which might imply limited interest in the model. Furthermore, @mr.ottopartz raises concerns about the vehicle's interior durability, hinting at potential issues that could arise from its age.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a genuine appreciation for the Audi RS2, with many users highlighting its stunning appearance and remarkable performance. @no.radar describes it as a "pristine example of an Audi classic," while @Nhskibm passionately describes the driving experience as "insanely sublime" and even compares it favorably against other iconic vehicles. The strong sentiment around the car's aesthetics, including its unique Vulkanschwarz color, is echoed by @viobelle, who mentions seeing it in person and deeming it beautiful. Additionally, @Audiaddict notes the car's excellent condition, while @Wagen59 emphasizes the impressive horsepower for a vehicle of its age.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the practical aspects of the RS2, including its functionality and maintenance queries. @mattyk2, the seller, provides answers regarding the car's specifics, mentioning included spare parts and the uniqueness of the custom ECU that enhances performance. Questions around the radio and air conditioning system are also addressed; for instance, @LBang inquires about the A/C's intermittent issues and @Theyagaraj shares insights into sourcing parts. This indicates an involved community eager to help potential buyers navigate the buying process while understanding the car's quirks.
Negative: There are a few concerns mentioned in the comments, primarily related to the car's A/C system and the absence of the original radio. @LBang expresses worry over the A/C's functionality, which @mattyk2 admits he hasn't had time to investigate. Additionally, @VWRabbithero criticizes the current substitute radio unit, which lacks compatibility with US signals. @ripper996 humorously anticipates potential buyers inquiring about California registration, hinting at possible challenges for those looking to drive the classic in that region. Overall, while the car is celebrated, these issues highlight practical considerations for prospective buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ccstyler, the seller, provided reassurance regarding the vehicle's maintenance, confirming that all service was performed on time at Jaguar of Lakeland, with the most recent service dated February 4, 2025. Additionally, @bringatrailer mentioned that six service invoice photos have been added to the gallery, expressing gratitude to the seller for sharing this information, which adds to the vehicle's credibility. Enthusiasts like @Mnewhall and @r32fan were actively engaged, expressing interest in hearing the engine's performance with requests for cold start sounds and driving videos.
Neutral: Some commenters raised questions about the vehicle’s service history and discrepancies in the reported mileage. @sipx inquired about the service history over the last two years, noting a gap in service entries despite regular maintenance at Jaguar of Lakeland, particularly pointing out that there was only one oil change documented over an extended period. @rlhug1954 and others discussed the potential issues related to the lien on the car, with various approaches on how to handle payment in such situations.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle’s condition, particularly the reported maintenance practices. @ezxh2 questioned the lack of service entries in relation to the significant gap in mileage, suggesting a potential oversight in the record-keeping. @rlhug1954 expressed skepticism regarding the necessity of brake replacements at only 19,000 miles and noted worries about a coolant leak, indicating that the absence of an adequate response regarding oil change records continued to be a point of contention among bidders.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters spoke positively about the vehicle, particularly noting its engaging driving experience and features. @Weary_Pilgrim expressed excitement about the 987.2 series, mentioning its decent horsepower and excellent color options, while praising it as a smart buy. @jscifres noted the rarity and appeal of manual 987.2 S Boxsters, emphasizing its naturally-aspirated power and engaging inputs. @FHaluska shared their own experiences with the model and highlighted the fun and communicative driving experience the 987.2 offers. The Seller, @GAcardude, also mentioned that the vehicle has been well-loved and is rich with features aimed at enhancing the driving experience, like Sport Chrono and PASM.
Neutral: Comments also included neutral observations regarding the vehicle's history and condition. @Peller80 was initially concerned about the IMS bearing due to common inquiries seen about Porsche models, but other commenters including @Lconkisstador and @Sd2000 clarified that the 987.2 does not have an IMS bearing issue. @juanc37 asked about the manual transmission fluid and requested additional videos to better assess the vehicle, while other users like @MarkBC expressed a preference for manual transmissions in general.
Negative: On the negative side, there were a few concerns raised about the car's condition. @Jon_Kokomo noted some wear on the vehicle's interior from a specific photo, while @factologist inquired about the dent near the convertible cover. @BFalkmk3 questioned the oil consumption indicated by @GAcardude, who confirmed needing to add a quart between changes during certain periods but emphasized consistent and careful maintenance. Overall, while there were some concerns mentioned, the majority of comments were encouraging and focused on the vehicle's positive attributes.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @HemiFiveseveNLiter, the Seller, expresses genuine excitement about the sale of the 1999 Ford Crown Victoria, highlighting its impressive mileage of just over 27k. The seller provides a warm invitation for inquiries, complemented by helpful links to detailed walkaround and driving videos featuring respected automotive journalist Chris Amos, enhancing the overall appeal of the listing. @2822MM praises the Crown Vic as a beautiful example and acknowledges the seller's great presentation, rating it a perfect 10 out of 10 and emphasizing its durability and longevity, which resonates well with potential buyers.
Neutral: Commenters such as @HelloImAdam and @Wheels4life raise practical questions regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, particularly oil changes and the status of the timing chain. The seller efficiently provides clarifications, conveying that the car wasn't a daily driver and received regular maintenance, despite the absence of hard documentation. Other comments reflect personal anecdotes and fond memories associated with the Crown Victoria, including nostalgic mentions of the car's comfort and maintenance ease from @Swissman564, as well as additional commentary on the auction process from @Expresswasher about shipping logistics.
Negative: While the overall sentiment remains largely positive, the inquiries from @HelloImAdam regarding the vehicle's oil change history and maintenance raise concerns about potential gaps in the service records due to the reliance on verbal assurances rather than documented proof. @Wheels4life inquires about possible intake manifold leaks, showcasing a cautious perspective from some commenters. Additionally, @Expresswasher's light-hearted joke about the vehicle's trunk capacity for bodies suggests an awareness of the car's reputation but may imply a perception of it being an 'old-school' car in a somewhat morbid context.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express excitement and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its vintage appeal and performance capabilities. @Espanolie notes the 'whole lotta fun to drive' aspect, while @rsbm5 reminisces about personal memories associated with Oldsmobiles, emphasizing emotional connections. @PDXBryan and @Closer_2001 appreciate the thoughtful restomod build, citing it as a well-sorted vehicle perfect for highway driving. Additionally, @mike_rockwell points out the aesthetic success of the build, commending the exterior and wheels, reinforcing the overall positive sentiment towards the vehicle.
Neutral: Some commenters provided neutral observations. @Bmyers questioned the presence of power steering without clarity, while @Duke_Dallas inquired about the vehicle's original equipment and trim tags, showing curiosity about the car's history rather than expressing a strong opinion. This indicates an interest in both the car's modifications and its original state. @1600veloce, the seller, offered detailed information on the vehicle's features and maintenance while addressing questions about its condition, helping to bridge the gap between potential buyers and their concerns.
Negative: There were few negative comments about the vehicle. @georgepehanick critiqued the driver's gear shifting technique during the test drive, labeling it as 'amateur,' which suggests there may be some concern regarding the vehicle's handling under inexperienced driving. @Bmyers commented about the absence of AC as a setback, indicating that despite overall positive sentiments, there are aspects that potential buyers might view as imperfections. Overall, while enthusiasm for the car is dominant, a few critical observations highlight areas of caution.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @intrepid1 mentioned that it's a beautiful car, while @bratfink also acknowledged the car's great looks and unique character despite questioning the relevance of certain road test articles. @Super7Driver praised the original Esprit design, noting its striking appearance and compact size. @robbieh20 echoed this sentiment with enthusiasm, describing it as spectacular. @casejam reminisced about personal connections to the car, adding to its nostalgic appeal. @Z07Vette called it gorgeous, highlighting the general admiration around its aesthetics.
Neutral: The topic of importing the car generated discussion, with @JiminRichmond suggesting that while it may be tricky, with the right paperwork, it's manageable. @jpq pointed out the challenges surrounding right-hand drive (RHD) vehicles in terms of registration in the US, while @bratfink noted that he did not face significant issues in registering RHD cars. @Sordo (The Seller) clarified that the vehicle met the 25-year requirement for simplified importation into the USA, providing reassurance to potential buyers about the car's compliance with regulations. Several participants touched on technical details, emphasizing the complexities of legality in specific states, particularly California.
Negative: Some comments expressed concerns over the practicality of the vehicle, especially @AMfan, who raised issues with smog testing in certain states due to the car's non-Federal status. @MikeGriese pointed out the challenges regarding emissions compliance in California, while @RJ80 criticized the repeated mention of California's regulations in discussions about the car, suggesting that Californians are already aware of these matters. Additionally, some comments about the road articles being outdated triggered debates, with @CarFoolLane and @blizzard340 discussing the broader context of automotive journalism and its implications.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the uniqueness and rarity of the Suzuki XN85, with @Round_Rock_Rob reminiscing about previous models and expressing a desire to own one again. @ejhansen05 notes this auction offers a great chance for someone to take home a well-maintained bike without worrying about mileage. @CarzAndMotorcyclz praises its ability to spark conversations and calls it the nicest example they've seen in a while. Others, like @PabloMusi and @Gibbs, express admiration for the bike's styling, history, and condition, confirming its place in the motorcycle community as a collector's item.
Neutral: The seller, @chasjen, provides insights into the bike's condition and personal history with it, explaining that while he once owned multiple Japanese turbos, he is now parting with this one due to personal discomfort while riding. He mentions there is a broken mounting post on the right-side panel and engages with potential buyers' inquiries to clarify details and share additional photos as requested. Several users discuss modifications and upkeep, emphasizing that while parts can be hard to find, the bike is generally manageable for those who know how to repair it.
Negative: Some comments point out the limitations of the Suzuki XN85, with @DTS5724 mentioning the frustrating turbo lag that can affect performance and handling. @ToddTCE mentions that the bike is not particularly powerful or comfortable, which may deter some potential buyers. @80sboy's inquiries regarding the broken part imply concerns about the bike's condition. Furthermore, comments about possible difficulties in sourcing parts suggest that while the XN85 is a collectible, it may present challenges for maintenance and repair.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic and performance qualities. @Ben commented on the "Nice Clubby", showing enthusiasm for its recent race history, while @MissuDad noted that it looks like a lot of fun. @AliceAustin shared her excitement, calling the car "totally awesome" and expressing interest in having a Mini with a Clubman front design. Additionally, @BritaxCooper praised the car's preparation and suggested it would be a good fit for events like the Rolex Monterey Motorsports Reunion, reiterating the overall appreciation for the vehicle's build and racing background.
Neutral: Commenters engaged in discussions about the vehicle's specifications and performance, focusing on technical details. @klaar1 inquired about the lack of window clips and acknowledged that although prices for similar models are low currently, good vehicles tend to maintain their value. @NikoK, the seller, provided information about the car's racing history, mentioning its last participation in the Rolex Monterey Motorsport Reunion and the inclusion of logbooks with the sale. Others, like @pizzaman09 and @chromedome, discussed the unique Weber carburetor setup, leading to explanations about its design and benefits by fellow commenters.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's condition and readiness for certain racing events. @klaar1 pointed out potential issues regarding safety requirements needed for vintage racing that might not be met by this car, such as missing window clips and the absence of a safety net. Despite the overall enthusiasm, there were queries about the detailed specifications of the vehicle's engine and other mechanical components, with @Layloo asking for specifics about the crankshaft and compression ratio. These inquiries indicated a cautious approach among some enthusiasts regarding the car's compliance with racing standards.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BidRunner (The Seller) describes the 1969 Chevrolet Camaro Pace Car as a beautiful vehicle with a documented history dating back to the early 80s. @boaboyoz echoes this sentiment, calling it an exquisite example and wishing good luck with the auction. @PonyCarTim shares appreciation for the restoration efforts, noting how the decals were likely applied during the pre-delivery processes and thanking the seller for maintaining the authenticity of the car.
Neutral: Some commenters raise questions about the car's authenticity, particularly regarding the trim tag. @Londonauto and @NMendez22 express concerns about the cowl tag and the possibility of alterations. @BidRunner (The Seller) responds by referencing the car's restoration process and offers to provide further information on the VIN number under the passenger side cowl screen.
Negative: Concerns are voiced about imperfections with the car. @dlyraleighUSA mentions a hole near the door handle, leading to uncertainty before @BidRunner (The Seller) clarifies that this is a factory feature, which @dlyraleighUSA then acknowledges. Additionally, @captcamaro, @PonyCarTim, and @Jack659831 debate the placement of stickers, with @Jack659831 expressing a dislike for the decals on his car, which leads to further discussions on the correctness of the vehicle's presentation.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @SpecWerksLTD (The Seller) expresses a heartfelt appreciation for the VW MK4 Jetta, noting it has one of the most timeless designs for a compact sedan, especially highlighting the appeal of the VR6 with a manual transmission. @Cincinnatus_WKRP and @Mgh20180 echo this sentiment, calling it an underrated car that holds historical value and great performance, especially for young drivers in high school. Others like @kaptin2g and @2017VWGolfAlltrack share their fond memories of owning similar models, reminiscing about their fun driving experiences and overall build quality that makes the MK4 line last through the years.
Neutral: Several users, including @Jakerdog and @Dsauce28, ask specific questions about the vehicle's condition, noting concerns about the potential for rust and inquiring about the AC system's functionality. @SpecWerksLTD (The Seller) addresses these inquiries candidly, reassuring interested parties that any concerns related to the vehicle's condition are being handled, including replacing missing front bumper covers and confirming the working order of the AC system. This neutral section of comments shows a mixture of interest and examination of the car's condition as it moves towards a potential sale.
Negative: On the downside, @Butch1966 raises concerns about accident repairs, specifically mentioning the missing parts in the front bumper. This hint of possible damage makes some prospective buyers wary, alongside @Jakerdog's concern about rust potentially affecting the vehicle's structural integrity. Even with assurances from @SpecWerksLTD (The Seller) regarding the vehicle's maintenance and condition, the lingering doubts cast by these comments may influence the confidence of potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect an engaging environment with potential buyers expressing interest in the CTS-V auction. @Motorcarsintl, the seller, is welcoming and encourages bidders to reach out with questions, showing a willingness to facilitate inspections and communication, which is appreciated by observers. The invitation for direct inquiries suggests a transparent selling process that can foster trust among bidders.
Neutral: Several comments pertain to the vehicle's exhaust system, with varying degrees of observation. @sommeraaron brought up concerns regarding the symmetry of the exhaust tips, prompting @Motorcarsintl to acknowledge that while not perfect, the alignment is quite close. The conversation hints at the car's potential adaptability for emissions tests, indicating that information is being shared among bidders about regulatory considerations, which is neither entirely positive nor negative.
Negative: However, there are clear criticisms from users like @Username355, who argues that the exhaust tips are notably uneven both vertically and horizontally. @lunchbocks2002 also commented on legal implications, warning bidders that the car might not pass inspections in many states without modifications, suggesting that the vehicle's compliance issues could deter prospective buyers concerned about registration and emissions laws.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BCross1984, the seller, expressed pride in their ownership of the Defender 110, detailing a number of improvements made over nearly three years. These enhancements include a new LS-3 crate engine, which transformed the vehicle's performance, allowing it to cruise comfortably at 80 mph. The seller also highlighted other modifications such as a second fuse box, new steering wheel, all-terrain tires, heat seats, and a premium ceramic coating, emphasizing the care and passion put into maintaining the vehicle.
Neutral: Comments from other users included details about the vehicle's history and performance enhancements. @WAGONBOYTD noted the importance of mentioning that Otokar constructed this vehicle rather than Land Rover, and raised curiosities about the powertrain setup and performance while noting the appealing shade of blue. The context of the car being a custom Defender made by Otokar while raising potential questions on taste and aesthetic choices in the interior design were also discussed by @Griswards and @mad_max99.
Negative: On the downside, several users criticized the interior aesthetics. @mad_max99 described the leather work as horrible, echoing sentiments from @GBRBiLL who likened the interior to a skin disease. Others raised practical concerns about the vehicle's features, including @Nolift911 who mentioned a faux snorkel, and @t_mac pointing out an apparent oversight regarding CV joint protection. Overall, these negative comments focused on the vehicle's visual elements rather than its performance.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MChilli described the 2008 BMW 550i Sport as a beautiful car, indicating that it could land around $15K-$20K. @sy1616 praised the vehicle, stating they had previously owned two 2008 550i models with the sport package, emphasizing that it is one of BMW's best chassis. Additionally, @StyleCars highlighted the exceptional low mileage of 21k and the car's remarkable condition, listing various high-end features and affirming that it's a great option for both BMW enthusiasts and those seeking a powerful sport sedan.
Neutral: @StyleCars provided details about the car's specifications, stating that it offers a perfect blend of executive presence and performance with a 4.8-liter N62 V8 engine and an impressive list of factory options. The seller also mentioned the availability of nationwide shipping and promises to answer any questions from potential buyers. Comments from @AgnarJ and @Dspoljaric reveal concerns about the vehicle's history, including a 10-year gap in Carfax reports and inquiries into its condition and previous damage, which were addressed by the seller.
Negative: @geeitup expressed concerns regarding the 10-year gap in the Carfax report and mentioned that low mileage may not necessarily be beneficial for a BMW known for various engine leaks. @AgnarJ inquired about information regarding damage to the vehicle and its long storage period, reflecting skepticism about potential underlying issues. @zogee raised questions concerning the vehicle's reprogramming history, indicating a desire for transparency about the car's maintenance.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received an array of compliments emphasizing its nostalgic appeal and vibrant color. @Z282SLO mentioned the 'Miami Vice' aesthetic works beautifully on Fox bodies, and @BigSwole shared fond memories of owning a similar model, expressing a desire for another despite concerns over its mileage. Others like @Detroit_Iron noted the car captures the essence of the 90s, with vibrant colors like Calypso Green being a standout feature that makes it eye-catching. There is a consensus among commentors that this Mustang remains a joy to own and drive, particularly highlighting the fun and thrill the vehicles offer, as noted by @Tom1200 and the seller, @usynthesis.
Neutral: Several comments highlighted the vehicle's characteristics and features with an informative tone. The seller, @usynthesis, explained that while the car has higher mileage, it is still under average for its age, suggesting it is well-maintained. @EKS3011 remarked about the slight aesthetic issue of having wheel weights placed outside the wheels but acknowledged the engine condition is surprisingly clean. Additionally, some commenters noted the rarity and desirability of the Calypso Green color, with @Caz1 and @Detroit_Iron emphasizing its appeal in today’s market due to nostalgia and popularity during the 90s.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition and modifications. @7Stangs pointed out a potential cigarette burn on the driver's seat, questioning whether the car has been smoked in. The seller, @usynthesis, explained that while he used to smoke occasionally, he rarely did so in the vehicle, indicating the burn could be from a previous owner. In addition, @EKS3011 and others hinted at inefficiencies in certain repairs, notably concerning how tire balancing was handled, suggesting a preference for proper maintenance practices that might not have been adhered to previously.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the 2010 Ferrari 458 Italia, particularly highlighting its aesthetics and performance. @stoli2nite (The Seller) mentions that the car is one of Ferrari's ultimate dream cars and emphasizes its reliability compared to previous models. Commenters like @autoarcade and @bulletnozeguy express enthusiasm for the carbon bucket seats and love for the car, stating that they are comfortable for long drives. The consensus is that the white color (Bianco Avus) along with yellow calipers enhances its appeal, making it a stunning vehicle. Many agree that this model will likely retain its value over time, with @Mason320 noting it as a top choice for the price.
Neutral: Several users brought up technical aspects, particularly around brake and transmission maintenance. @CCO raised concerns regarding potential transmission issues, which @stoli2nite (The Seller) promptly addressed by confirming no prior sensor issues. Comments from others, like @justinstephen, sought clarity on brake wear and maintenance costs, reflecting a practical consideration for potential buyers. @2006m5 and @ram_g engaged in a discussion about brake components, with differing views on their longevity and maintenance costs without escalating the conversation into disagreements.
Negative: Conversely, there were some critical remarks about maintenance and the implications of ownership. Comments from @CCO and @Mylesofsmyles hinted at negativity surrounding the costs associated with the car, focusing on brake replacement and service expenses in a speculative manner, which upset some users. @MGRMLN raised concerns about the possibility of needing a new clutch after watching driving videos, which others found unnecessary given the car's history. The overall discussion suggests that while the car is celebrated for its aesthetics and driving experience, potential maintenance costs lead to skepticism within the community.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle's condition and aesthetic appeal. @johnnyvett notes that the 2005 model in the same color has garnered numerous compliments over his decade of ownership. @FSU83 highlights the car as a 'brand new 20 year-old V,' expressing belief that someone is going to acquire a wonderful car. @1bobcat and @denny2009 further emphasize the excitement surrounding the XLR V and its unbeatable performance, with @1bobcat stating it delivers 'more SMILES per MILE' than any other vehicle. @Saleen07 mentions the timeless design and aesthetic quality of the car, particularly praising its convertible form.
Neutral: Comments from @alexg182, the seller, indicate that the car comes from a reputable collection and is in immaculate condition with no leaks. He addresses specific inquiries about the vehicle, assuring potential bidders of its quality. For example, he responds to @idy-ho's question about the front bumper, confirming its excellent condition, and to @blizz2000 regarding the functionality of lights, promising to provide requested photos. The seller also notes that he is managing inquiries about the reserve price without disclosing it, aiming to instill confidence in potential bidders about the car's value relative to other market offerings.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle are raised by several commenters. @Idy-ho questions about potential blemishes on both the passenger seat and under the front bumper, seeking reassurance about the car’s integrity. @LorenPaul criticizes the presence of old tires on a well-prepped vehicle, suggesting that it may detract from the overall appeal despite the car's other qualities. @blizz2000 expresses concern about the high cost of potential replacements for the headlights and taillights, emphasizing the importance of proper functioning. These comments highlight the meticulous scrutiny potential buyers have regarding cosmetic appearance and maintenance issues.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Multiple comments highlight the Norton Dominator 88 as an exceptional motorcycle. @csilver1 (The Seller) notes that the bike is a 'sweet ride' and prefers it over his 1954 Vincent Black Shadow, appreciating its reliability and handling. @rlincoln echoes this by recalling his own experience with Norton bikes, stating that the Dominator 88 exemplified outstanding handling and smooth performance. @DaveD describes the bike as a 'lovely, complete and highly original Dommie,' underscoring its unique character compared to contemporaneous models from BSA and Triumph.
Neutral: Several comments point out various aspects of the bike without strong opinions. @csilver1 mentions the bike's original 6-volt electrical system, explaining that whilst it hasn't been converted, transitioning to a 12-volt system would be straightforward for the next owner. @Apathyfern observes that the bike runs well in a video but expresses concern about the state of the roads in the area. Additionally, there are inquiries from @MM4 regarding logistics and requests for photos, which @csilver1 responds to with helpful information about storage and shipping.
Negative: There are minimal negative comments, but @Slinkert humorously critiques the trend toward bigger bikes, implying that earlier models like the 650cc Nortons were more enjoyable. @csilver1 candidly discusses the bike's tank showing oxidation, although he confirms there are no signs of significant issues like pitting or leaking, indicating some wear that potential buyers should consider. Overall, the negative sentiments are mild and don't heavily detract from the overall perception of the motorcycle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is praised by multiple commenters for its stunning aesthetic, with @RSM describing it as "exceptionally gorgeous" and @ksauce highlighting the 2.5 engine as "a monster" that is fun to drive. The seller, @cz13, mentions having fully garage-kept the car and describes regular maintenance without any mechanical issues, reinforcing its well-kept condition. He has received numerous compliments regarding the car’s appearance from various sources, further emphasizing its appeal as a well-maintained Porsche Boxster.
Neutral: There are several inquiries regarding specifics about the vehicle, including warranty transfer details brought up by @Pmcd and clarifications on the PPF application on different panels from @enginerdify. @Rhayner confirms that the CPO warranty moves with the car, providing clarity for potential buyers. Additionally, @cz13 has been proactive in addressing questions and confirming that the car has been driven minimally during winter months, underlining its maintained condition while providing information on its history.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's imperfections, particularly regarding the convertible top, with @RockaChaw noting road rash and paint chips. @kastnke1 pointed out paint scuffs and requested details on the undercarriage, while also questioning the high mileage accrued in a short time. The seller, @cz13, expressed uncertainty about the source of the convertible top damages, describing the damage as symmetrical yet not entirely clear on its origin, which may raise concerns for prospective buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments from @ProudSon_73 reveal that the truck is in excellent condition, maintained meticulously by the previous owner, who kept it in a climate-controlled garage. The truck features a 6.5 ft bed and has a clear history with no cracks on the dashboard, as confirmed by the seller. Additionally, it has received regular maintenance ahead of schedule, with oil changes and lubrication performed based on time rather than mileage, resulting in pristine oil condition. The seller expresses pride in the vehicle's collector's grade status, highlighting the low mileage, special features, and unique blue interior that is believed to be rare.
Neutral: Several potential buyers ask practical questions about the vehicle, including the age of the tires, open recalls, and its ability to pass California emissions testing. The seller, @ProudSon_73, provides detailed responses, confirming the truck's tire purchase date, the open recall for a tailgate cable, and the presence of necessary emissions components for its model year. There are inquiries about towing capacity and RPO code stickers, to which the seller promises to provide photos and additional information, reflecting a typical back-and-forth exchange found in vehicle sales.
Negative: The comments also contain some confusion regarding the vehicle's ownership history. @funwithson points out discrepancies about the mileage logged by the previous owner, raising questions about the father's use of the truck and current registration details held by the seller's mother following the father's passing. @ProudSon_73 addresses this confusion, explaining that while his father purchased the truck, the current registration is under his mother's name, who has not driven it since then. This clarity, while necessary, introduces uncertainty about the overall ownership and usage history of the truck.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BMWE90Guy expressed a strong preference for the vehicle, stating he would choose it over a new Escalade any day. @Dollycat3 described the vehicle as a "gorgeous low mileage double black beauty," highlighting its aesthetic appeal and low mileage as attractive features.
Neutral: @Cmorris1972 inquired about the functionality of various vehicle features such as the air conditioning, heat, radio, and window controls, as well as whether the vehicle had been smoked in. @Klast94 (The Seller) confirmed that all accessories function properly and that the vehicle has never been smoked in during their ownership. @KenHurder questioned the reason for the sale after such a short ownership period, while @Shfenley asked about the availability of service records and the vehicle's purchase history, which @Klast94 addressed by confirming some records would be included and reassuring that it was not purchased from an auction.
Negative: No negative comments were noted in the feedback regarding the vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Vtec4ever expressed admiration for the truck's aesthetic, appreciating its cool design from an era when Jeep was producing standout vehicles. The commentary indicates a sense of nostalgia attached to the model, suggesting that it holds a special place in the hearts of enthusiasts. @Matador75 and @rgfulks also contributed positively, engaging in a light-hearted conversation and recalling its appearance on a popular television show, further cementing its cultural significance.
Neutral: The Seller, @ZachOrr2156, provided clarifications regarding inquiries about the vehicle, addressing concerns about the engine and drive shaft noise. He noted that the engine issue previously mentioned was due to a typo and explained how the noise manifests when turning the wheel. He was also responsive to requests for additional photos and information about the truck's condition, promising to provide updates as circumstances allowed. The discussion around potential rust-related concerns shows an intention to be transparent and forthcoming with information.
Negative: There are hints of concern about the vehicle's condition, as noted by @goosemanRS4 who highlighted issues with the engine not shutting off correctly and the front drive shaft noises. @surfdog sought clarification on visible rust spots, indicating uncertainty about the truck's overall condition. Furthermore, @Rosemary raised questions about the doors' functioning, inquiring whether their alignment issues could affect usability and reliability. These negative comments reflect a desire for more detailed information to assess the vehicle's viability as a daily driver.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @emichaelly (The Seller) mentions that the bike drives great and has no mechanical issues, indicating a positive overall impression of the vehicle's performance. They also note that it sounds great, suggesting that it offers a satisfying auditory experience for riders who appreciate the acoustic characteristics of a Harley.
Neutral: @emichaelly (The Seller) provides context regarding the titles and odometer readings attached to the bike. They acknowledge that the odometer is aftermarket and that due to BAT policy, the bike is marked TMU (true miles unknown). The seller expresses uncertainty about when the odometer was switched, which suggests a willingness to provide honest information about the bike's history, though it leaves some ambiguity for potential buyers.
Negative: The mention of the odometer being aftermarket and the bike being labeled TMU could raise concerns for potential buyers about the true mileage of the vehicle. This uncertainty may lead some to question the bike's condition and maintenance history, potentially detracting from its desirability.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express significant enthusiasm for the vehicle, praising its appearance and features. @K51020Ranch refers to it as a 'brown beauty,' emphasizing its strength and utility as a heavy-duty truck. @e9er highlights the great looks of the truck along with the appealing wheel and tire combination, while @CRUSH appreciates the classic square body design and suggests modifications like lifting it and adding larger tires for off-road performance. @DBG1973 shares personal experience, noting the truck's durability and value appreciation over the years, suggesting that the new owner will be very pleased with it.
Neutral: Comments include some informative observations regarding necessary details for potential buyers. In a query, @Ortsac3159 asks about various features of the truck including the availability of windshield wipers and the stock air cleaner, indicating some parts may not be original. @WCD2020, the seller, responds to these concerns and clarifies the status of several components, admitting that the vehicle had some updates after years of storage. Commenters also show interest in additional information about the truck's condition, including requests for specific photographs of the door jams and undercarriage.
Negative: While the overall sentiment is positive, a few criticisms were voiced regarding specific aspects of the truck. @rmoudry raises concerns about the gauges saying they appeared damaged, suggesting potential issues with the vehicle's upkeep. Additionally, @Ortsac3159 questions the functionality of the cruise control and speedometer, pointing out a broken speedometer cable, which further raises eyebrows about the vehicle's current condition. Overall, while the truck is generally well-received, some comments indicate that it may require more thorough inspection and assurance of its working parts.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly noting its impressive history and capabilities. @PetrolInVeins shared a nostalgic fondness for the 999s, explaining how much they enjoyed riding theirs, emphasizing its fun factor, especially when it was in great condition. @indetrucks praised the bike's performance on the track, reminiscing about their own experience with a 999S and highlighting its stability and reliability, which encourages potential buyers to consider taking the bike to the track.
Neutral: @Niteroi, the seller of the bike, shared insights about his attachment to the 999, revealing that he has a ritual of maintaining it and other special bikes every week. He mentioned that it was difficult to part with this model, indicating its sentimental value despite the need for variety in his collection, which includes a brand new Desmosedici. Several commenters, like @8wayside, responded positively, although they mentioned they were looking for a different model, reflecting an overall appreciation for the bike's aesthetic.
Negative: There were no direct negative comments about the vehicle; however, some comments indicated a preference for other models over the 999, such as @8wayside's statement expressing a specific interest in the R model instead. This suggests that while there is admiration for the 999, some enthusiasts may lean towards different Ducatis for their own riding experiences.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @LilSnort praised the vehicle for its nice build and aesthetic appeal, suggesting that simply rotating the front wheels would appease critics. @mick59 commended the tasteful modifications that improved upon the stock appearance of the late model Beetle, noting that the customization was executed well. @Atomik_Abel remarked on the car's impressive presence at local shows and the seller's enthusiasm for sharing his knowledge, contributing to a positive overall impression of the vehicle. @Toddh03 expressed a strong affection for the VW, highlighting its gorgeous appearance and appealing interior color.
Neutral: Several commenters asked for clarifications and additional details about the car's condition. @Frankentek inquired about issues with the driver's door and requested video evidence to demonstrate the door's functionality. @raynekat pointed out a potential typo regarding the engine specifications in the listing, leading to a correction by @bringatrailer. @bostonaudi requested more pictures of the vehicle's underside to assess rust repairs and expressed concerns about the engine's sound, suggesting it might not be running optimally. @muski (The Seller) provided updates on rust assessments and adjustments made to the vehicle following feedback from various commenters.
Negative: Concerns about potential rust spots and mechanical issues were raised by several users. @Britcarfun pointed out that the rear wheels appeared upside down, while @LilSnort and @bostonaudi suspected possible engine problems, advising a compression or leak-down test for better diagnosis. @LilSnort also noted issues with the patchwork visible in the pictures, highlighting that the repair on picture 77 did not cover the area adequately. @muski (The Seller) responded to these criticisms, attempting to reassure buyers about rust repairs and engine adjustments, but worries persisted regarding the car's overall condition despite the positive features mentioned.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments about the vehicle showcase a very enthusiastic reception. @Benz58 (The Seller) highlights the unique qualities of the bikes, stating they are beautifully restored with no flaws and mentioning their impressive performance. Commenters like @Blizzard340 and @EJWinters3 express their admiration, with @Blizzard340 calling them a 'super cool pair' and @EJWinters3 imagining the joy these bikes would bring to their nephews. Additionally, @Cclason reflects on personal memories while considering the purchase.
Neutral: There are inquiries about the specifics of the vehicles, particularly from @X-77Keith, who asks about the years of the bikes and points out details that might indicate they are not from the expected time frame. @Benz58 (The Seller) responds knowledgeably, confirming the VIN numbers and promising to double-check the details for accuracy. This exchange indicates a healthy level of curiosity and interest in the bikes, showcasing a community engaging in knowledgeable discourse about the items up for auction.
Negative: Some comments hint at potential misunderstandings or concerns. @X-77Keith's comment was flagged as non-constructive, implying that discussions about the specifics of the bikes may have been heated or contentious. However, @Benz58 (The Seller) largely maintains a polite and informative stance, addressing questions directly but acknowledging potential gaps in his immediate knowledge. Overall, the negative sentiment appears minimal, focused more on the need for clarification rather than any significant discontent.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed significant excitement about the vehicle, with @creamofgold stating a wish to acquire this 'gem' and @IMissMySaab declaring the car beautiful with a great photo shoot. @BobbyWauffer praised the car as a 'wild' and 'super rare bird,' indicating its potential for a record sale. @glossedauto even checked out the car in person and confirmed its clean condition, encouraging confidence in bidding. Many believe the vehicle is a standout example of the RS4 cabriolet, with @Anyglenwilldo noting its excellent maintenance in a climate-controlled environment and @RNLabas providing detailed information on its rare paint options, indicating the car's value as a collector's piece.
Neutral: Comments have highlighted the car's rare features and asked for additional information, such as videos and original documentation. @BLT4SPD and @Samson27 both inquired about obtaining the option tag and the original window sticker, which @911r responded to with the revelation that while the original sticker is not available, they are arranging a recreated version. Concerns about service history were brought up by @eitanassil, who asked for details about past maintenance, and @JR60 raised a question about a lien issue. The general consensus among many commenters suggests a keen interest in the car's specifics, but no strong stance is taken beyond curiosity and desire for more information.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about the vehicle's design, such as @DragonDale questioning whether the car is truly 'sexy' and @adayes criticizing the choice to use B6 A4 rear lights for the B7 cabriolet. These critiques hint at a divide in opinion on the aesthetics of the vehicle compared to other models. Furthermore, @TreverJimmy humorously warned against driving the car too much given its low mileage, which could imply worry about using a collector's item too frequently. Overall, while the enthusiasm for the vehicle is strong, there are some reservations regarding design choices and usage practices.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Overall, the comments highlight the positive aspects of the 1991 Ford F-250. The seller, @32fordhutch, emphasizes the truck's excellent condition, citing its original ownership and lack of wear as strong indicators of its reliability. The meticulous ownership history documented in the CARFAX report also reassures potential buyers about the vehicle's mileage verification and condition. Furthermore, the seller confirms both fuel tanks are functional and shares that the truck runs and drives well for a vehicle of its age, maintaining its original features aside from minor additions like the bed liner and running boards.
Neutral: There are a few neutral comments centering on inquiries about the truck, such as questions regarding details like whether both fuel tanks are operational and the functionality of the air conditioning system. The seller provides clear and informative responses to these inquiries, confirming that both tanks work, although they discovered that the air conditioning currently does not blow cold and will need repair. The seller’s responses reflect transparency about the truck's condition while also addressing the logistics and purchasing process, including the offer to store the truck or assist with transportation for the buyer.
Negative: Some concerns raised by commenters touch on potential issues with the vehicle, such as the unusual noises detected during a driving video, prompting @Gumbygto to question the source of the rattling sound. Additionally, @Tirefriar questions the accuracy of the odometer reading and seeks verification for the vehicle's mileage. The seller acknowledges these concerns, particularly the noises, and commits to recording a new video to address the issues. However, the mention of the air conditioning needing repair may also deter some buyers, adding to the list of observations that require attention before final sale.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters appreciate the classic Yamaha motorcycle, describing it as a remarkable example that brings back nostalgic memories of ownership. @RickT206, for instance, reminisces about dreaming of this model during his childhood, while @RaymondTononi fondly recalls owning a similar model and celebrates the bike's beauty and originality. Additionally, @msgallin highlights that the bike is an AMCA Award Winner, suggesting it is of high quality, and @1956bill shares a personal story about racing a similar bike, showing admiration for the classic design. Overall, there is a consensus on the motorcycle's excellent condition and historical value, making it highly desirable.
Neutral: Comments from @oakes1 (The Seller) provide additional context about the bike itself, such as the presence of rare features like the dipstick for both fuel and oil levels, as well as the tools included with the bike. The seller clarifies that the engine has not been rebuilt, only serviced with a new clutch and oil pump, which emphasizes the bike's originality. @1FOCUS-RS inquires about a cold start and riding video, reflecting the curiosity of potential buyers regarding the bike's performance. Commenters like @kstadleman share their own experiences with similar Yamaha models, indicating varied personal connections to the bike and its brand without overtly praising or criticizing the current listing.
Negative: On the critical side, @1FOCUS-RS expresses frustration over the lack of cold start or running videos from the seller, which could be seen as a deterrent for potential buyers looking for assurance of the bike’s operability. Furthermore, @deltas69 recounts a sad story about a lost Big Bear bike, describing how a friend's motorcycle was neglected to the point of falling apart, highlighting the potential fate of such classic models if not well maintained. These comments introduce a cautionary tone regarding the preservation and care of vintage motorcycles, contrasting with the general positivity surrounding the current bike being offered for sale.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Canvan (The Seller) provided a lot of positive insights about the vehicle, detailing its history and maintenance. The truck was initially sold in California, and the seller has been proactive in seeking documentation to verify its past ownership and odometer readings. The seller also mentioned that they have communicated with border customs regarding the process of re-importing the vehicle back to the U.S., indicating that the vehicle can enter the country without duties since it was originally registered in the U.S. This information brings a sense of reassurance to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters had neutral observations. @pmhalley expressed concerns about the vehicle potentially exceeding his budget but noted it looked clean. Another commenter, @Adverik, requested additional information regarding any dings on the vehicle and asked for a cold start and driving video, indicating they are interested but seeking more details. @whisturk pointed out a specific technical detail regarding the vehicle's actuator but didn't express a strong positive or negative opinion, just seeking clarity on possible modifications.
Negative: On the downside, there were some concerns raised about the vehicle’s history and condition. @pmhalley noted a potential discrepancy related to an 'odometer rollback' that he believed was simply a misreporting of kilometers as miles, highlighting the need for clarity on mileage claims. Meanwhile, @DavidLeeRaleighNC made a somewhat humorous comment about the wheels, suggesting they should remain in Canada, hinting at concerns over parts compatibility for U.S. buyers. Lastly, @Mainebound questioned the reason for the sale, indicating skepticism, which can often be a red flag in vehicle transactions.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed nostalgia and appreciation for the Chevrolet Citation, with @Arno highlighting the classic design elements such as the bug shield that evokes memories of the 70s and 80s. @PDXBryan and @Kurte551 (The Seller) both acknowledged the significance of the Citation as one of GM's early ventures into front-wheel drive technology. Commenters like @bvd praised its fuel efficiency, noting an impressive 38 mpg, while @Dcisfun emphasized its spaciousness and practicality for transporting goods. The overall sentiment was that the Citation, particularly this well-preserved example, is a unique find worthy of attention.
Neutral: Several commenters provided factual insights and historical context about the Chevrolet Citation, discussing its design and engineering origins. @Kurte551 (The Seller) mentioned that the car had been well-maintained, having spent its life in Colorado and being part of a large collection before being sold. @Vtec4ever contributed to the discussion by correcting misconceptions around front-wheel drive models, while others like @Sil_80 pointed out the issues with GM’s automatic transmissions of that era, sharing mixed experiences. Overall, these comments provided a balanced view of the car's legacy without heavy bias towards either admiration or criticism.
Negative: On the other hand, there were comments reflecting skepticism about the Citation's reliability and quality during its production era. @au94 recounted his father’s ordeal with an Oldsmobile from GM that failed shortly after purchase, hinting at a broader concern over GM's build quality in the 80s. @Erl and @Kayemtee shared personal anecdotes about their experiences with related models that faced significant issues, such as defective brake designs and transmission problems. These negative reflections indicate that while the Citation holds nostalgic value for some, its technical shortcomings continue to be a point of contention.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, highlighting its stunning color, Irish Green, and overall beauty. @mef0629 described it as a true unicorn with a beautiful dash cluster, while @MrTfromLabadie simply called it 'stunning!' @kscritch admired its rarity and mentioned its historical significance, noting the small production numbers of 912 Targas in 1967. Overall, the comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and condition, with some even suggesting that it could fetch a high price given its quality.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on various aspects of the vehicle, indicating a mix of interest and inquiry rather than outright opinion. @UOLDDOG and @Yellowboatscars asked about service records, original keys, and the mileage on the engine. @cardwell pointed out details regarding the tinted windshield while @Euromoto raised questions about potential body work seen in the pictures. This back-and-forth shows that while the car is well-regarded, potential buyers are keen to ensure they have all necessary information before bidding.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns or highlighted areas for attention on the vehicle. @Jfp58 pointed out that the tires were from 1990, suggesting an immediate need for replacement, while @UOLDDOG echoed this sentiment with requests for a video of the car running, hinting at doubts over its current condition. Additionally, @Frank_Barrett inquired if any sheet metal had been replaced, showing apprehension regarding the car's structural integrity. These concerns juxtapose the admiration for the vehicle, showcasing the complexities of classic car ownership.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @JEDIII (The Seller) showed enthusiasm in engaging with potential buyers by correcting an earlier mistake regarding the cold start video and providing clarity about the bike's condition. They emphasized that the MV has never suffered damage, which helped reassure potential buyers about the bike's integrity. Additionally, @JEDIII demonstrated a commitment to customer satisfaction by actively searching for and potentially offering accessories like the tre pistone kit to the winning bidder.
Neutral: Comments from users like @Johnmccoyitaly presented informative insights regarding the model's history, explaining the popularity of larger displacement MV bikes over the smaller F3. They also provided context on the bike's components, particularly how the original "Oro" bikes featured gold magnesium parts, contrasting with the gold-painted aluminum parts of the current model. This kind of information is neither overly positive nor negative but serves to inform potential buyers about the bike's features and historical context.
Negative: Several users expressed concerns regarding the bike's condition, particularly referencing @eshum's remark about the bike's appearance in a specific photo, worrying that it might reflect poor handling. @R1andrew inquired about the absence of specialty items that generally accompany high-end bikes, which could imply that buyers expect more value. Additionally, @butch1963 raised questions about the bike's damage and requested further clarification on original papers, which creates apprehension regarding the vehicle's overall value and presentation.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's pristine condition and its historical significance. @Dan_in_Reno described it as a 'Time Capsule' and highlighted its exceptional chassis, while @dougtop and @702e30girl echoed similar sentiments, calling it a 'gem' and a 'fantastic E30' respectively. @LarryM praised the car's remarkable state given its history in the salt belt, noting it had been treated with great care. Additional praise came from @Nateyboy30, who mentioned the car's suitability as a daily driver due to its balance of comfort and performance, and @Caymanorcarrera, who called it a 'low mi classic beauty' with potential for various modifications. Furthermore, @Vette60 expressed a personal connection, reminiscing about enjoying the ES models and highlighting the vehicle’s appealing color and interior combination.
Neutral: Several comments provided factual insights or sought clarification on specific aspects of the vehicle. For instance, @kandles asked about service records, indicating interest in the vehicle's maintenance history. Questions about functionality, like air conditioning and cruise control, were raised by @donstevens17 and @Brookscompton, highlighting the importance of operational status in a vehicle of this age. There were also mentions of potential for performance upgrades from @Myersport, who shared personal experience and data about enhancing the ETa motor's capabilities. @bimmertimmer and @sourced commented on recent maintenance tasks such as the timing belt replacement, ensuring potential buyers that the car had been well-maintained.
Negative: While most comments were positive, there were a few concerns expressed regarding the vehicle's history and authenticity. @Pablo questioned the repainting of the hood and trunk, indicating a desire for transparency regarding the car's condition. @Brookscompton also inquired about the air conditioning system's conversion status, suggesting uncertainty about the car's updates. These comments hint at a level of skepticism surrounding the vehicle's pristine appearance and maintenance claims, which is typical for high-value classic cars. Furthermore, the slight apprehension surrounding potential pain points points to a more cautious perspective among some interested parties.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the condition and features of the 2007 Jaguar XJ Convertible, with @SuePermann noting its remarkable original condition and rare options such as the leather and wood steering wheel and Adaptive Cruise Control. @SDCR also praises the vehicle's Indigo Blue color and mentions its reliable and powerful 4.2 engine, while @CA-Jag highlights that the color combo looks great in person and that the car appears newer than it is. Overall, there is a consensus among several users that Jaguars, particularly this model, are underappreciated vehicles with a strong community support system, as mentioned by @jagbit and others.
Neutral: The comments reflect a mix of technical inquiries and shared personal experiences with Jaguars. @Ragtopguy asks practical questions about the AC and the water pump, receiving direct responses from @jameskowski (The Seller) regarding the AC function and the condition of the water pump. @Ferrarichamp expresses a desire to seek more knowledge about Jaguars and thanks the experts for their insight, indicating the importance of forums and collective knowledge in maintaining these cars. @jameskowski provides detailed information about the vehicle's upkeep, emphasizing the care it has received over the years.
Negative: Despite the positive discussions, there are concerns reflected in the comments such as the lack of explicit maintenance records for certain components like the water pump. @Ragtopguy's queries highlight an aspect of uncertainty regarding the vehicle's history. However, @jameskowski (The Seller) assures potential buyers by emphasizing his thorough inspections and the car's excellent preservation due to its previous owner's meticulous care. There is an underlying worry about reliability since Jaguars have had a reputation for issues in the past, although this is countered by experiences shared by various users about the improved standards since Ford's acquisition of the brand.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GBRBiLL finds the vehicle appealing due to its six-speed transmission and looks forward to learning more from the comments. @rodzila appreciates the affordability of the F-40, while @Unimog2010 is surprised to see a version of the F-40, noting the uniqueness of the model. @Knuckles-R-Busted enjoys the classic Rosso Corsa color of the F-40 and its wheelie bars. Additionally, @mr_fillup (The Seller) welcomes potential buyers, highlighting the fast and affordable entry into owning an F-40. He presents the tractor as a unique restoration, offering insights into its size and functionality, mentioning its ability to hit 16mph—impressive for an antique tractor.
Neutral: @Ranchero65 provides context by mentioning that this tractor was offered just prior to the merger with Massey, and seeks confirmation about the transmission from @mr_fillup (The Seller). @todonnell6 inquires about the availability of videos for the tractor's features, such as cold start, PTO, and 3-point lift. @mr_fillup (The Seller) responds indicating he has arranged for videos to be taken while he is out of town, showing responsiveness to buyer inquiries and maintaining engagement during the auction process.
Negative: There are no notably negative comments in the interaction regarding the vehicle. The discussion remains positive or neutral, focused on appreciation for the vehicle, questions about its attributes, and logistical arrangements for potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The seller, @LongiMotorsports, presents this 17 RRS as an excellent value, highlighting its original price of $93,000 and its appealing features, which include ambient lighting and a digital dashboard due to its 2017 software upgrade. The seller emphasizes their commitment to quality, stating that they only deal with inventory they would buy themselves, and they ensure each vehicle is driven and tested before being listed on reliable platforms such as BaT and Cars & Bids. They encourage potential buyers to view all photos and videos provided, demonstrating their transparency about the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Some bidders have expressed interest in specific features, with @bless asking for a photo of a missing mirror control knob, while also requesting details about driver seat wear. @jeddb inquired about the air suspension functionality, prompting @LongiMotorsports to promise updates and additional videos. Additionally, @Mattgrom raised a concern about auction activity, while others are looking forward to further video evidence of the vehicle's features, indicating a level of engagement and curiosity among potential buyers.
Negative: There are hints of frustration in the comments, with @Mattgrom criticizing another user for bidding excessively without wins, suggesting a negative auction atmosphere. @jeddb also expressed concern about the air suspension, highlighting a potential issue with the vehicle's performance on uneven terrain. These comments imply that some buyers might have reservations about the vehicle's reliability or the competitive nature of the bidding process.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Vtec4ever describes this mini bike as one of the most awesome he's seen in years, reminiscing about Honda's CR 60 and referring to this bike as the granddaddy of that model. @chanjamf agrees, noting the bike's sweet lines and hot red tank, sharing how he admired it when it first came out, despite being too old to ride at the time. @johnehand shares a personal connection, calling it his first motorcycle and expressing his love for the ride. Similarly, @RamblinMan fondly recalls memories of using a similar bike for his young boys, emphasizing its durability and the joy it brought to their family, while wishing he hadn't sold it. @JKB4 reminisces about learning to ride on this bike, reflecting on the fun he had and its impressive power for a smaller rider.
Neutral: There are questions about the bike that may indicate potential buyers' interest in its current condition. @AZkid asks if the bike has been restored, suggesting that some may want to know about its maintenance history. @GT40P2247 inquires about a video start-up and running, indicating that potential buyers may prefer to see it in action before making a decision.
Negative:
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is receiving admiration for its overall excellent condition, with @alfriedesq describing it as an "amazing car" and @59turner mentioning that it is a "perfect" weekend cruiser. Many commenters express confidence in the car's value, with @bmwspyder predicting a high sale price. The unique color, Macadamia, has also drawn positive attention, with @rrysedorph recalling their own positive experience with the same color. Furthermore, @Jedijunkie1 (The Seller) provides clarity about the car's features and its issues and has been responsive in addressing queries, which builds trust with potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters are keen to establish more details about the vehicle before making a purchase. @Wallyremi1 requests multiple sets of photos, including the dashboard and areas where paint protection film (PPF) is located. @JGordon5454 expresses concern over the seller's quick resale, asking for more details on the maintenance done during ownership. @blackonblack911 raises inquiries about the vehicle's capabilities, particularly regarding the rear wing's operation and the car's performance for long-distance travel, indicating that some additional clarification is necessary.
Negative: On the downside, there are concerns regarding the condition of the car, particularly issues related to a peeling dashboard and foam from the heater core, which @alfriedesq and @G-Dub note as common problems for the 997 models. Additionally, @Wallyremi1 noted that the tires are quite old, suggesting that this could affect performance. @blackonblack911 also pointed out discrepancies in the vehicle's appearance after what is presumed to be a hard 4900 miles, questioning if it was tracked or subjected to strenuous conditions, which may need addressing before a sale.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the outstanding condition and features of the 1993 F-150. @littlehandegan noted having seen the vehicle in person, describing it as 'NICE', while @UsernameX reminisced about their experience with a similar model in 1993, suggesting it was a great all-around vehicle. @P42DC called it one of the nicest single cab OBS trucks they've seen, praising the two-tone look and overall aesthetic. @JoeWick1 regarded it as 'absolutely flawless', and @Wilks pointed out its impressive condition after 30 years in Illinois, emphasizing the truck's rarity and durability.
Neutral: @Permanent_Vacation, the seller, engaged with potential buyers, providing detailed information about the truck's maintenance history and updates. They confirmed that undercoating was applied recently and attempted to showcase the truck's underside, addressing inquiries about additional photos and the condition of the vehicle. @JT77 asked about towing capacity and received a thorough response from the seller, mentioning the truck's rated towing capacity and possible upgrades for better performance. The seller also mentioned they would be available for further questions until the auction's end.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about specific features. @DaveZ06 expressed uncertainty regarding the roof clearance lights mentioned in the Marti report, as they had not encountered this option on similar models before. Additionally, @tidmack questioned the appearance of a rattle can finish on the underside of the truck, indicating some skepticism about the vehicle's detailing. Nonetheless, these comments did not overshadow the overall positive remarks, contributing to a balanced perspective.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dspoljaric highlighted the appeal of the Alpine white color on the M5, noting its rarity and expressing best wishes for the sale. @66jimini also praised the car, admiring its color and complimenting the cold start video, describing the tuned sound as wonderful. @Handyandy (The Seller) remarked on his emotional attachment to the vehicle, stating it was a bucket list car that he took special care of and enjoyed driving occasionally, further emphasizing that the engine runs smoothly with no issues.
Neutral: @Handyandy (The Seller) provided details about the car's current condition, noting some typical small oil weeps for a vehicle older than ten years but clarifying that there were no frequent oil additions needed between services. He also mentioned recent service record acquisitions and confirmed the condition of the turbos, reassuring potential buyers that there is nothing concerning about them for a low mileage car. @S54PocketRocket inquired about recent service records and the DME report, indicating a cautious interest in the vehicle's service history.
Negative: @hieptran raised a potential concern regarding the vehicle's previous use on a track and any issues that might have arisen from that experience. There were no direct negative comments from @Handyandy (The Seller) regarding the car's condition, but the mentioned oil weeps, which are typical for older cars, may suggest a point of concern for discerning buyers. Additionally, @WWM3 clarified that BMWs do not have DME reports, which may indicate a limitation in the seller's record-keeping that could worry some buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle for its aesthetic and historical appeal. @boaboyoz called it a 'beautiful blue Bradenton Bronco' and noted its tremendous build quality, while @Velocity_Restorations highlighted its charm and excellent condition as an early example of a Velocity partial restoration. The seller, @nguess25, elaborated on the extensive work done during the restoration, showcasing impressive upgrades including a new engine and refreshed undercarriage components, further increasing its desirability for potential buyers.
Neutral: Questions about specific features of the Bronco were raised, such as one from @briank34 asking who manufactured the soft top, to which @nguess25 confirmed it was made by Rampage Products. Another inquiry concerned the exact color of the Bronco, and @Velocity_Restorations suggested it could be Harbor Blue, though the documentation was limited given it was an early build. The seller remains proactive in answering these queries and providing necessary information to interested parties during the auction process.
Negative: Despite the overall positive remarks, there are some concerns regarding the lack of documentation and features. @TDTBRECK inquired about the availability of a hard top, to which @nguess25 had to clarify that it is not included with the sale, though they offered assistance to fit one post-sale. Some potential buyers may find this lack of a hard top disappointing, as it can limit the vehicle's appeal for driving in certain weather conditions.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's specifications and appearance, particularly the striking white exterior with red leather interiors, which was noted by @64wheels as one of the best combinations. @jre701 echoed this sentiment, stating their love for the red leather in Italian cars, while @mrsparky praised the carbon fiber accents that complement the interior beautifully. The Seller, @BrianFaulkner, provided prompt and helpful responses to inquiries, which contributed to a positive impression of both the car and the selling process. The vehicle's recent service and cleanliness led @MooseGunner to remark on its great condition, further enhancing its appeal.
Neutral: Several users asked for additional details about the car's specifications and features. For instance, @cgmorrow inquired about the updated infotainment system and requested photographs of it since it wasn't clearly displayed in the existing media. @Vigy79 sought clarification on the vehicle's specifications concerning its manufacturing origin. @1Marauder asked technical questions regarding the car's clutch and necessary maintenance, which @BrianFaulkner answered diligently, indicating the car's full service history and the conservativeness of driving style by its previous owner, providing a clearer picture of the vehicle's condition without signaling any immediate concerns.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns about the vehicle's icons and features lacking clarity in the current media presentation. @cgmorrow highlighted a potential discrepancy about the updated infotainment system's visibility in videos and pictures, questioning its authenticity based on earlier observations. @onehussler also noted potential items for consideration about brake and rotor replacement, though @BrianFaulkner reassured that there was no immediate need for these replacements. @Gemboo made a pessimistic remark about the potential auction outcome, suggesting that the car might sell below the factory upgrade costs, highlighting skepticism around the car's market value.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The 987.2 Boxster S is highly praised for its engaging driving experience, agility, and fun factor. Commentors like @jscifres and @scootrb4 highlighted its naturally aspirated power, analog steering, and exceptional handling capabilities, emphasizing that this model falls perfectly into the street-sportscar category. Other comments reflected on the car’s reliability, with @FHaluska noting it as a significant improvement over previous models and asserting that it is still more fun to drive compared to newer ones like the 718. Additionally, @IvantS8 appreciated the vehicle's aesthetics and the attention it has received from the owner, suggesting it was well-loved and maintained.
Neutral: Questions regarding vehicle specifics were commonly addressed, reflecting potential buyer curiosity. @Peller80 initiated a conversation about IMS bearings, to which several users including @Lconkisstador confirmed that the 987.2 does not have this issue, alleviating some common concerns surrounding the model. @GAcardude (The Seller) was responsive to inquiries about service history and vehicle condition, transparently discussing aspects like clutch replacement and providing records in the auction gallery. Some users also expressed interest in learning more about certain features, such as manual transmission fluid changes and additional videos of the car in operation, showcasing a blend of genuine interest and informed questioning from prospective buyers.
Negative: A few negative points were raised concerning the condition of the vehicle, notably the mention of wear on the convertible cover and concerns regarding start-up smoke from the flat-six engine. @Jon_Kokomo pointed out abrasion on a panel that required clarification, while @factologist and @BFalkmk3 discussed potential concerns about the vehicle's functionality due to these cosmetic issues. Moreover, @PGcar inquired about the history of service records to ensure the car has been maintained appropriately, indicating that buyers are cautious and looking for ample assurance regarding the condition and care of the vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the original condition of the 2014 Mercedes-Benz G550, particularly after @cwu (The Seller) removed the overland accessories. @JOP expresses gladness over the vehicle's restored original appearance, while @cdk1300 admires the elegant black and white color scheme, calling it clean and classy. The clean history of the vehicle, including no rust and consistent maintenance from a trusted local shop, further adds to its appeal for potential buyers.
Neutral: @cwu (The Seller) provides detailed information about the vehicle, including features such as the legendary 5.5L V8 engine, updated interior layout, and a multitude of comfort options like heated and ventilated seats. Questions from commenters address various aspects of the car, including the heated steering wheel option, lumbar support functionality, and the performance of the locking differentials. @cwu responds promptly to all inquiries, demonstrating a willingness to clarify doubts and provide additional information about the vehicle.
Negative: Some commenters raise concerns regarding specific features and the condition of the vehicle. @Marshall15 notes that the differential lockers took time to engage during a demonstration, prompting questions about their servicing age. @disasterman24 asks several detailed questions about the lumbar support, air cooling feature, alignment after tire installation, and the existence of rust around the windshield, which could indicate potential issues that buyers might want clarity on.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commentators express excitement and admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a "dream car" and a "beautiful car" with a unique special order matte paint that adds to its allure. @creamofgold wishes they were in a position to purchase this gem, while @IMissMySaab conveys envy for the future owner. There are also comments highlighting the vehicle's rarity and appeal, with @BobbyWauffer and @DragonDale appreciating the distinctiveness of the cabriolet version over the sedan. Overall, the community praises its aesthetic and performance potential, calling it a true collector's item.
Neutral: Commenters seek additional information about the vehicle and its history, reflecting a cautious interest. @BLT4SPD and @Samson27 inquire about the original window sticker and option tags, while @eitanassil asks about service records and the condition of its components, like tires and keys. The seller, @911r, actively engages with these requests, providing answers and posting photos, a new window sticker, and both walk-around and driving videos. Many are eager to see further documentation and videos to help inform their decisions on bidding.
Negative: While opinions are mainly positive, some contributors express skepticism about the vehicle's design and market performance. @DragonDale questions the visual appeal of the car, suggesting it lacks the sexiness of its counterparts, indicating a divide in aesthetic appreciation. Additionally, @RNLabas notes that while the cabriolet is a great driving car, it historically hasn't fared well in the market, implying that the vehicle may face challenges despite its current desirability. Overall, these comments suggest that while the vehicle is impressive, its design choices and market trajectory remain points of contention.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @626a shared their appreciation for the craftsmanship of the vehicle, emphasizing that they don't make cars like this anymore. @IceBolt07 and @XXX79 both echoed sentiments of admiration with comments praising its beauty. @johnnyvett reminisced about their past ownership of a similar model, expressing that the car looks gorgeous and has been well-maintained, noting the intact smog pump as a positive feature. Further, @motorcarmarketusa (The Seller) confirmed that the car retains many original features and has a repaint of its factory color, also addressing potential concerns about rust and confirming the integrity of the vehicle's body.
Neutral: Several users, including @philcgallacher and @Kdawg7, inquired about the condition of specific mechanical elements and asked for additional media, underscoring the importance of thorough documentation in the sale of classic cars. @JJKay raised concerns about obtaining a title from a Connecticut registration, while others like @200mph and @FullSize72 clarified that this is a legal norm in Connecticut for vehicles over 20 years old. @Triclopz noted potential inconsistencies in the front end's appearance, leading to questions about possible bodywork, thus reflecting potential concerns buyers typically have regarding vehicle authenticity.
Negative: Comments from users like @JJKay and @CraigStriplingClassics conveyed concerns about title issues and the potential for rust due to the vehicle's northern state of origin. @sixty6chevy and @Triclopz raised specific questions regarding physical damages and repairs on the car, such as the mentioned crack in the rear fender and inconsistency in the front grill. Overall, there were apprehensions about some aspects of the car that might detract from its value, suggesting that buyers should exercise caution and ensure all areas of the vehicle are thoroughly vetted before making a purchase.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect excitement and appreciation for the vehicle's unique features, particularly its six-speed transmission, which has intrigued users like @GBRBiLL and @rodzila, who expressed interest in an affordable F-40. @Knuckles-R-Busted praised the classic Rosso Corsa color and the addition of wheelie bars, enhancing its appeal as a collector's piece. @Ranchero65 noted the rarity of this model and its nostalgic connection to the Massey merger, indicating a strong interest in classic tractors.
Neutral: Several users, including @Ranchero65 and @todonnell6, sought clarification on the vehicle's specifications, demonstrating a keen interest in understanding its mechanics and operational capabilities. @mr_fillup (The Seller) provided information about the tractor, describing its restoration and size compared to other models, which helps potential buyers gauge its fit for their needs. He also mentioned the possibility of shipping assistance, indicating a service-oriented approach in the sales process.
Negative: While the comments are largely positive or neutral, there are slight undertones of uncertainty regarding the vehicle's exact features, such as the gearing system described by @Ranchero65, which could lead to confusion about its performance. Additionally, @todonnell6's request for videos suggests a desire for more visual information to reassure potential buyers about the tractor's condition and operation, highlighting a potential gap in pre-purchase information.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MilleMiglia expresses admiration for the classic beauty of the vehicle, particularly praising the color combination. @jockohenry shares his enjoyment of the car's commentary and acknowledges it as a beauty. @Brett_T_Evans describes it as a great little 'tinker toy' and appreciates the growing appeal of the cycle fenders. @KoBear1 also shares positive feedback on the headlights, indicating that they are striking, while @neverenoughgold suggests the car deserves to be enjoyed on the road. @Ernie60 enthusiastically states his love for the vehicle's style, and @Mgrescueguy highlights the interesting story behind the car, emphasizing its unique features and history.
Neutral: @pip007 raises a question about the aesthetics of the car, specifically inquiring about the removal of the wings and running boards, which contributes to the discussion without a strong positive or negative tone. @Valkyrja points out that the door frame could use some adjustment but does not dismiss the vehicle as a whole. @hankgiffin reflects on the commonality of cycle wings in racing, indicating that while there may be some rust issues, these modifications were practical. Many contributors like @Some_Guy and @morganplus8 discuss gearbox performance and potential repairs, providing constructive insights that are informative for potential buyers without expressing strong opinions on the car itself.
Negative: @BlackSwanM491 comments on the cycle fenders, suggesting they appear 'off' and do not conform properly to the tires, indicating a visual mismatch that detracts from the overall look. @CATFISHMAN critiques the rear fender and notes functional issues related to the missing running boards, questioning their practicality. @Rweiss6 raises a concern about the transmission problem, which brings attention to possible reliability issues. @SirJames mentions the restoration process for the gearbox, revealing the complexities and labor involved which could be off-putting for some buyers. @morganplus8, while noting the car's good condition, insists that reverting to original wings would enhance its value and aesthetic appeal, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the vehicle's original design.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @genevamotorcars (The Seller) expressed excitement about offering the 2016 L405 Diesel, highlighting its beautiful condition and original paintwork, which he believes contradicts the Carfax report. The seller is providing paint meter readings and a maintenance summary from his father, a retired Mercedes technician, indicating that the car has been meticulously cared for. Commenters like @gaadiwaala and @Kiwiterry complimented the vehicle's appearance and acknowledged the seller's transparency in sharing maintenance details, reinforcing the positive perception of the car's condition and upkeep.
Neutral: Several commenters raised practical questions regarding the vehicle's features and maintenance history. @Kiwiterry inquired about the speedometer functionality, while @Lyonsvee requested service records and video confirmations of the car's features. The seller assured them that everything works properly and has uploaded maintenance logs and videos to verify the vehicle's condition. @apiscionere pointed out the discrepancies in the Carfax report concerning theft, and the seller agreed that the report likely contains inaccuracies.
Negative: @volvo268 questioned the reliability of the claimed brake longevity, suggesting that the 80-90% remaining might not align with how Land Rover brakes typically wear. This raised concerns about the potential for misleading information on the vehicle's condition. @Kiwiterry also raised the point that brake wear is heavily dependent on driving habits and noted the importance of a responsible driving style, implying skepticism towards the maintenance claims. @Lyonsvee critiqued the homemade nature of the maintenance logs, expressing disappointment in the absence of formal service records.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MNberg describes the bike as beautiful and expresses regret for missing out on it in the past, wishing the seller good luck with their sale. @gthd agrees on the bike's aesthetic appeal; they mention that whoever buys it should have stylish gear that matches the bike. @Dak92159 shares that the bike is pretty with a favorite color scheme, and @bbass calls it epic, loud, raw, fast, and gorgeous, wishing the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: @Italjet mentions the authenticity of the cold start video and requests a follow-up video to see the bike running on both cylinders. @Hodsonsg echoes this request, suggesting that with some adjustments the bike should run smoothly. @Johnmccoyitaly provides historical context about Ducati's design choices, mentioning the bike's starting challenges and hinting that minor adjustments may be necessary after purchase.
Negative: @nmalam raises concerns over the bonded title and seeks clarification on whether the bike is salvage and requests a picture of the title for details. @ashleyf recalls their own experience with starting difficulties, suggesting that proper tuning is crucial. They comment that it took significant work and expense to get their bike to start easily, indicating that the bike may require similar attention. @1funduc states that the bike is a '78 model based on its components, hinting at a possible discrepancy or confusion among collectors.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @rightsaidfred shared a lighthearted comment reminiscing about the early days of Bring a Trailer, suggesting a nostalgic appreciation for the vehicle. @Kizarsoza expressed confidence that the vehicle would fetch a good price as the auction neared its conclusion, indicating optimism regarding the market interest. @The_Knight_Garage personally related to the conversion process, indicating it was common in the past and suggesting that this vehicle could be a fun project for someone.
Neutral: @Carreira930 provided various details about the car's history and condition, including information about its conversion, prior ownership, and the required repairs, without exhibiting strong positive or negative sentiment. The seller mentioned the specific needs of the vehicle, such as needing a paint job, a new front pan, a battery box, and an engine while noting that there is no serious rust. Additionally, @Carreira930 responded to inquiries about the vehicle's parts and shipping arrangements, indicating a willingness to assist potential buyers.
Negative: @billcawley made a remark suggesting that while the vehicle may have issues, it is nothing that time and money can't fix, hinting at a degree of skepticism regarding the car's current state. @Mithril911 implied skepticism about the vehicle's practicality by comparing it to a "Safari Dune Buggy" as a better alternative to the existing conversion. @porsche1986's comment reflected a sense of frustration or nostalgia, paralleling the vehicle's state with a personal experience of disassembly and inability to reassemble, which adds a layer of negativity regarding its condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors have praised the overall look and design of the vehicle, noting it has a sleek and modern appearance that stands out on the road. @flopez specifically asked about startup and idle videos, indicating an interest in how the vehicle performs and sounds in real-world conditions, which suggests that potential buyers are keen on assessing performance aspects through visual evidence.
Neutral: The conversation around the vehicle has included requests for additional information, specifically regarding its operational videos. The inquiry from @flopez about startup and idle videos reflects a common curiosity among potential buyers who are less concerned with opinions but more focused on tangible demonstrations of the vehicle's functionality.
Negative: There have been indications that some potential buyers may feel unsure about the vehicle due to the lack of detailed performance videos. @flopez's question highlights a potential gap in the selling process, as prospective purchasers are looking for assurance of the vehicle's reliability and quality through visual evidence of its capabilities.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @pinshaw expresses an emotional reaction, describing the vehicle with excitement as making their heart go "pitter pat." @leesdiamonds compliments the color scheme and the attractive details, calling it "Bellissimo." @Markro shares a personal experience, acknowledging the bike as a "dream machine" and expressing confidence that the winning bidder will be satisfied with their purchase. @ejhansen05 asserts that the seller, @911r, has a reputation for successfully selling high-end vehicles, indicating trust in the auction process. @EJWinters3 is impressed by the bike's power, highlighting its 208hp, while @rickaz fantasizes about riding it, calling it a dream come true.
Neutral: @Skiv playfully comments about the bike being close by, hinting at a strong desire to test ride despite joking about the requirements. @Stevebow17 wonders if this was the only collaboration year between Lamborghini and Ducati, while @Meccanica adds that the new Monster Senna they own, number 146, makes them even more interested in acquiring this bike, number 147. @cozs informs @Stevebow17 that both brands are owned by VW/Audi, suggesting potential for future collaborations. @A_Lewis mentions other Lamborghini models made in partnership with Ducati, noting the Panigale V4 and Diavel.
Negative: @TrailerTed cautions potential buyers about the risks of purchasing overpriced special edition bikes and suggests holding onto them longer for better resale odds. @marv800 questions what is included in the bags seen in the pictures, hinting at potential concerns over missing components. Overall, these comments, particularly from @TrailerTed, reflect skepticism regarding investment value and buyer expectations.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters appreciated the unique styling of the vehicle, describing it as a great grand touring vehicle with minimal wind noise, reliable power, and an excellent sound system. One commenter, @SilentCity, remarked on the attractive color combination and noted that it is a good-looking car with documented low mileage. Furthermore, several individuals expressed interest in the car, indicating its potential value, with @Baur2002 mentioning it could be a great deal at no reserve.
Neutral: A significant portion of the comments revolved around the vehicle's odometer readings, with several users requesting clarification on the reported odometer rollback. @TurboTomj pointed out inconsistencies in the readings that raised doubts, while @FlyNavyP3 and @24601 emphasized the importance of addressing these concerns as they could deter potential buyers. The seller, represented by @genevamotorcars, attempted to address these concerns by explaining that the reported mileage discrepancies were due to clerical errors by a dealership, and assured readers about the accuracy of the current readings.
Negative: On the negative side, there were multiple concerns raised regarding the vehicle's history and reported damages, with commenters asking for more verification on repairs and the overall condition of the car. @Bond001 expressed worries about the paint matching and potential accident history, while @D-cannon highlighted past recommendations for an engine replacement that weren't acted upon. Additionally, @DavidGarth pointed out wear and tear inconsistent with the reported mileage, suggesting possible underlying issues that could affect the car's value.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @YaRight expresses a warm welcome back, wishing the seller the best during this sale. @MilleMiglia complements the vehicle's color scheme, indicating its attractive appearance. @barryang (The Seller) shares appreciation for the supportive community following discussions about his father's health, which highlights a connection among car enthusiasts. @PerpendicularBisector appreciates the scenic background of the vehicle, referring to nostalgic imagery with Kim Novak, adding a charming touch to the comments. @Ab150 shares a personal connection with the vehicle model and mentions upgrades that enhance performance, indicating a strong fondness for Jaguar cars.
Neutral: @jmarr12 raises a technical question, clarifying whether the vehicle is a Series II and mentioning the carburetor type. @davidxk responds with precise information about the car’s classification, reinforcing the distinction between Series 1.5 and Series 2 models, which adds valuable context without expressing a strong opinion. @brookway offers constructive feedback about the vehicle's documentation, requesting additional images of key identifiers to help verify details, demonstrating a methodical approach to assessing the car without overtly positive or negative commentary.
Negative: While there are no overtly negative comments, @brookway's mention of incorrect titling could imply potential concern regarding the vehicle's history. This raises a flag for those considering the purchase, suggesting that clarity and documentation are necessary for confidence in the transaction. Overall, there is a sense of caution advised when it comes to verifying the authenticity of the vehicle's history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CarmanUSA2025 remarked on the prevalence of limited edition Mustangs coming onto the market, suggesting that they will be seen as valuable in hindsight. @DKeng expressed excitement for the Roush model, stating that it’s fun and addicting to drive, while @Porterj (The Seller) confirmed this sentiment by agreeing it’s addictive and fun. Additionally, @baja1000 appreciated the beauty of the car, envisioning it as a great fit for their ranch and wishing the seller good luck with the sale.
Neutral: @DKeng shared information about the production numbers for the 2012 Roush models, indicating that the limited production adds to the car's uniqueness. @scottmadwi provided detailed statistics on the number of units built and suggested contacting Marti Auto Works for additional data regarding production specifics. @Porterj (The Seller) engaged with the community, noting the number of inquiries regarding production numbers and statistics, as well as mentioning that this was their second Mustang in the lineup.
Negative: @HemiHayes raised concerns about the engine shifting and gauge performance, which prompted @DKeng to suggest that the seller provide detailed videos showcasing the vehicle's operation. In response, @Porterj (The Seller) assured that there are no transmission issues and that the gauges flickering seen in videos is a camera effect rather than an actual issue with the car. The interaction reflects some apprehension about the car’s mechanical aspects, as not everyone is completely satisfied with the documentation provided.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Ericcoolcars (The Seller) provides timely responses to inquiries and is proactive about sharing videos and pictures of the vehicle's features, such as the convertible top and the wind deflector. He notes that everything in the car is functioning, highlighting that one key fob works well and there are no fluid leaks reported. Overall, the car appears to have been well-maintained, as mentioned that it was garage-kept by previous owners.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @SockPuppet, @Motts71, and @jdgretz, seek clarity on various aspects of the vehicle, including the status of the wind deflector, the seat repair, and questions regarding the cylinders in the convertible top. @Broughtattailer75 brings up specific issues noted in the Carfax report, which the seller acknowledges. The inquiries are mostly about clarification rather than complaints, indicating some interest in the car's condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition by @Broughtattailer75 regarding multiple broken parts and the incomplete repairs. Commenters like @Motts71 and @SockPuppet press for details on the repair status of those issues, particularly regarding the driver seat and wind deflector. @BLKHWK expresses apprehension about the key fob situation and the potential for aftermarket copies, indicating a lack of confidence in the existing arrangements.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @IdahoTruckAndRV provided helpful explanations regarding the vehicle's features and condition. They clarified that the 'black metal shelf looking thing' is a Hooke Road interior cargo rack, which can be installed for additional cargo space. Furthermore, they assured @mbnut that the frame of the vehicle is in good condition, with no rust holes present, and confirmed that any previous treatment was done professionally to prevent corrosion.
Neutral: Some comments primarily sought information rather than expressing opinions. @McCrackin's inquiry about the cargo rack and @mbnut's request for a detailed description of the frame's condition were both aimed at understanding more about the vehicle rather than offering judgments. These questions reflect a desire for clarity on specific aspects of the vehicle without expressing a definitive positive or negative viewpoint.
Negative: There were no explicitly negative comments regarding the vehicle itself, but @mbnut's request for details about the frame suggests a concern about potential issues. The mention of the need for a description of any corrosion damage indicates a cautious approach from the commentator, implying uncertainty about the vehicle’s condition, even though @IdahoTruckAndRV reassured them.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments highlight the vehicle's beauty and well-maintained condition. @Toys4life describes the truck as incredibly beautiful, while @Sarki notes it looks well cared for and well loved since day one. @CadeInSoCal also affirms that the truck appears to be well taken care of, signaling pride in the upkeep of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters raised inquiries regarding specific vehicle details. @Hibpshman asked for service records to gain more insight into the maintenance history, while @bcmotors4758 questioned the gap on the driver's door and the broken radio knob. @volt and @84Cressida inquired about the functionality of AC, suspension, and the condition of the ball joints, indicating a thorough interest in the truck's mechanics and performance.
Negative: Concerns were voiced regarding potential issues with the vehicle. @bcmotors4758 pointed out an unusual gap in the door and other mechanical questions which might suggest hesitance about the truck's condition. @thinman questioned the overall condition of the paint and potential scratches, raising doubts about the truck’s appearance. Additionally, @cbradshaw (The Seller) responded to concerns with clarity, attempting to alleviate fears but indicating that some questions remained unanswered.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm for the Ural bike, noting its fun factor and versatility. @GBRBiLL mentions that it must be Ural week on BAT, highlighting his own enjoyable experience with a 2016 model. @SonnyAK fondly recalls having an identical model while living in Alaska, enjoying rides with his dog, and wishes the current owner good luck with the auction. Similarly, @SidecarPluto and @racepirate (The Seller) share their joy in riding with pets, creating a community vibe around the bike's utility for companionship and adventure.
Neutral: Several comments provide observations about the bike's specifications and history. @carlivar questions the odometer's display, pointing out that it is in kilometers despite miles being more prominent. @rob.johnston asks about the bike's past, specifically where it spent its first 20 years, to which @racepirate (The Seller) responds about its previous storage in Arizona. On a practical note, @maestromind requests a picture of the emission sticker to ensure it meets California requirements, demonstrating a cautious approach to potentially purchasing the vehicle.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about the bike’s condition and historical background. @maestromind highlights the age of the tires, suggesting they might be 20 years old, and expresses worry about potential issues due to the bike being in storage for a while. @racepirate (The Seller) addresses these concerns by stating that although the spare tire may be original, the tires on the bike have been changed and assures that the bike runs great. Additionally, @racepirate (The Seller) mentions logistical challenges they face regarding parts, specifically an original gas cap that takes a long time to order, reflecting on the difficulties in maintaining older models.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @brownandcomotorcars has presented a collector quality 2023 Demon 170 with ultra low mileage, stating that the current owner has kept it in an air-conditioned building. The seller is open to answering questions and providing shipping quotes, showcasing a willingness to assist potential buyers. Additionally, @esql88427 commented positively on the presence of the vehicle on Bring a Trailer (BaT), noting its significant role in setting the market for Demon 170 auctions, which indicates a robust interest in the car.
Neutral: Several potential buyers have expressed inquiries about the vehicle. @parshooter questioned the number of keys it comes with, while @jgilj53 sought clarification on whether it includes one or two keys. @Ramble1 requested the chance to view the car, asking for an address and suitable visiting times. The seller, @brownandcomotorcars, confirmed that it should have two keys and is open to arranging viewings, adding a personal touch to the auction. Furthermore, comments regarding features like a sunroof indicate different preferences among buyers.
Negative: Concerns about the auction process have been raised, particularly regarding the seller's potential bidding behavior. @Hockster speculated whether the seller had placed a bid on their own car, which raises questions about the integrity of the auction. Additionally, there was a mention of a Manufacturer Customer Satisfaction Notification pertaining to spark plug gaps, suggesting that while the car is desirable, it may have some underlying issues that need addressing before sale.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GTSCL believes this is the greatest generation of the Cayman Porsche and expresses that someone is going to get very lucky purchasing it. @Sniper15 (The Seller) is responsive to the community's inquiries, indicating that the car includes sport and sport plus options, which @groupj confirms as a standout feature. Additionally, @canyon123 appreciates that the undercarriage is pristine and free of rust, with regular updates and willingness from @Sniper15 to provide additional photos of the undercarriage upon request.
Neutral: @MFOX interacts with @Sniper15 regarding the driving video upload, showing a light-hearted exchange about tagging the right person. There is a request from @Marcus1209 for a cold start video, which @Sniper15 indicates is forthcoming. The communication indicates a level of engagement from potential buyers, such as inquiries about the exhaust and cold start performance, with @RJ80 providing technical insight into the exhaust modification.
Negative: @leesdiamonds expresses disappointment that the vehicle is not an 'S' model despite being excited about the 2009 year. There are concerns raised about the maintenance records, where @pipelnr is unable to find complete records for certain part replacements and @Marcus1209 points out an issue with the exhaust being sagging, which @RJ80 clarifies is a minor adjustment rather than a serious concern. This back-and-forth reflects some apprehension about the vehicle's condition among prospective buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, emphasizing its coolness and potential as an eye-catching display or conversation starter. @MNberg described it as 'VERY COOL' and suggested it could serve as a striking piece in front of the right business. @jbrucebmw also found it intriguing and inquired about the registration process in California, eager to see how it could be put on the road. @unimog2010 appreciated the story behind the vehicle, reflecting on the nostalgia of car culture and stating, 'Awesome story! Wish people could do this with cars nowadays.' The camaraderie among commenters and the fond memories of the seller's father created an appealing narrative around the vehicle, making it more than just a car.
Neutral: Discussions about the vehicle's technical aspects emerged, with commenters seeking clarification on certain features. @Davey_Jones asked about the electric starter, noting discrepancies in the listing regarding the vehicle's condition. The seller, @MortgageLifter, provided insights into the history of the car and informed commenters about the maintenance performed by their sister. This included unclogging the fuel line, cleaning the carburetor, and addressing engine issues. Although there were questions about the missing generator and battery specs, the seller's detailed responses helped to clarify these points and supported the transparency of the listing.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, there were critical observations, particularly from @Paul-G, who flagged potential safety concerns related to the gas tank's placement and the implications of using a 12V system on a vehicle designed for 6V. @Paul-G's inquiries about the electric starter and battery led to concerns about clarity in the listing’s technical details. These comments suggest that while the story and sentiment around the vehicle are strong, there are valid issues regarding its operational status and safety that potential buyers should consider.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @pinshaw expresses heartfelt admiration, saying it makes their heart go pitter pat. @leesdiamonds loves the color scheme and appreciates the design details, calling it 'Bellissimo' and full of 'Gingerbread.' @Markro describes the bike as a 'dream machine' and believes the winning bidder will be satisfied with just a glance at it. @EJWinters3 is impressed with the bike's power, exclaiming '208hp… WOW!' while @rickaz dreams about riding this exhilarating motorcycle. @Meccanica hopes to acquire this specific model seeing it as a continuation of the collaboration between Lamborghini and Ducati.
Neutral: @Skiv jokes about the necessity of license and insurance for test rides while expressing a sense of longing as the bike is just across the river. @TrailerTed acknowledges the bike's special nature but warns about the viability of flipping such a high-priced item soon after purchase. @ejhansen05 supports TrailerTed's perspective, suggesting the auction will succeed with @911r's experience in selling high-end vehicles. @Stevebow17 inquires about the exclusivity of the collaboration between Lamborghini and Ducati, indicating curiosity about the motorcycle's background.
Negative: @TrailerTed implies that investing in an overpriced 'special edition' bike may not be wise unless held long-term, a sentiment echoed by @Skiv's joke about being able to even test ride it. @marv800 questions what is included in the Ducati box and appears skeptical about the contents. @911r (The Seller) attempts to clarify these concerns by confirming everything included is brand new.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @2caddiesandaMach1 praises the vehicle as the best looking A-body with an impressive stance and classic Oldsmobile style, emphasizing how the black paint highlights the Cutlass's design. Commenters like @rab1004 express nostalgia and admiration for the classic Oldsmobile, recalling personal experiences with similar models, and @DeereGreenLS7 expresses eagerness to view the car in person, indicating a strong interest in its appeal. Overall, there is a sense of enthusiasm for the car's aesthetic and performance qualities, with many recognizing it as a beautiful example of its era.
Neutral: A few commenters inquire about specific details regarding the car's specifications and history, such as @DocOlds asking why the seller is parting with the vehicle and @Duamy questioning whether a build sheet is available. The seller, @Reslus1, provides informative responses, such as confirming the lack of a build sheet and discussing the rear end's specifications with @kenskars805. This exchange reveals that potential buyers are looking for more information to assess the vehicle's authenticity and value, contributing to an informative dialogue surrounding the listing.
Negative: Some concerns arise about the vehicle's authenticity and condition, with remarks from @Cheezbucket questioning the type of heads on the engine, and @Belhambra1 seeking clarification on the originality of the engine and transmission. Comments like these reflect skepticism regarding the car's modifications and potential deviations from its original specifications. Additionally, @Moparmanbet's inquiries about whether the carburetor and other components are original indicate a desire to ensure the car remains true to its classic roots, suggesting that some potential buyers may have reservations.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Beans_Bacon expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as ready for both Moab and Rubicon trails without issues. @markhedden (The Seller) emphasized the quality of the workmanship and reassured potential buyers about the vehicle's reliability, sharing that he has owned and serviced multiple Jeeps over 50 years. @84FLH complimented the aesthetic of the Jeep, especially the colored wheels and multicam seats, which he felt beautifully framed the vehicle's interior and exterior.
Neutral: @markhedden (The Seller) mentioned that the Jeep was previously owned by a 'rich kid' and primarily used as a toy for street driving, without serious off-road use. He clarified details of the vehicle's modifications and repairs, including the replacement of components like the locker and transfer case due to a vibration issue that was ultimately resolved. The seller reported that the repairs took care of all vibrations and ensured the vehicle was now traveling perfectly, confirming it was built for Rubicon use while also maintaining a smooth ride.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @hegear regarding the necessity of replacing the locker and transfer case, along with inquiries about the brand of control arms and lift size. @84FLH questioned the integrity of the repairs visible in specific footwell areas and asked about any potential oil leaks or recalls. Additionally, @markhedden (The Seller) noted minor flaws in the paint, specifically on the hood and fender, indicating that previous fixes included a repaint, yet sounded reassuring in terms of the overall structure being intact.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Thepaulywog (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a wonderful car in great condition. He appreciates the early build of the 996, particularly the lightweight nature and nimbleness it offers in turns, emphasizing how it was built alongside the renowned 1998 993s. Commentors like @zuffenhinson and @Rboat also express their admiration for the car, specifically highlighting its special specifications and features such as the LSD and amber turn indicators. Overall, the sentiment around the vehicle is mostly positive, with several individuals praising its build quality and performance.
Neutral: @Thepaulywog (The Seller) openly discusses the car's history, including minor issues like a weekly oil leak and a sunroof rattle that he has not prioritized fixing. He details the maintenance he has conducted, including oil changes and part replacements, and mentions his transparency about the car's condition. Commentors like @dg463 ask for clarification regarding the vehicle's RPMs in a driving video, and @Rmatth7 inquires about potential repairs or modifications that could be beneficial if the seller were to keep the vehicle. These discussions reflect a neutral stance, focusing on the details of the car's performance and maintenance while acknowledging minor concerns.
Negative: While @Thepaulywog (The Seller) mentions that the oil leak is negligible and that the car does not burn oil, the fact that even a minor leak exists is noted with some concern among potential buyers. Commentors express curiosity about the high RPMs during a video, with @dg463 questioning if this indicates a transmission issue. Additionally, @Rmatth7 estimates significant upcoming repairs and maintenance costs, indicating possible long-term concerns for potential buyers. The combination of these comments creates a subtle atmosphere of hesitation regarding the car's overall reliability despite its appeal.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @UsernameX declaring it a "real deal beast" and praising its beauty. @Mithril911 expressed a desire to take the car racing, indicating a strong emotional connection to the vehicle's performance potential. @Jeffz appreciated the car's aesthetics and pointed out the exquisite workmanship, while @RadRichie reminisced about loving the "66 Chevelle" and praised its color. @boaboyoz echoed this sentiment, calling it a "wonderful Washington Chevelle" and adding the good luck wish to the seller.
Neutral: Several potential buyers and interested parties asked for more information about the car, showing a mix of curiosity and caution. @bbilly asked for specific details about the rear gear ratio, while @koppitzkars clarified aspects about the vehicle's classification and previous discussions about its SS badge. @Doogster requested additional photos and information about flaws and features, including tire sizes, confirming the presence of a hydraulic clutch and questioning the odometer's accuracy. The seller, @luther1966, frequently responded with clarifications and further details regarding the car's specifications and modifications.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about the car's authenticity and condition. @koppitzkars pointed out that the VIN indicated it was not a true SS model, while @Turboj91 expressed frustration over unclear details about engine specifications that potential buyers might want to know. @Dcrt7i questioned the lack of a cold start or driving video, implying that the absence of such footage might weaken buyer confidence. Additionally, @Doogster mentioned some flaws regarding paint chipping and interior issues, highlighting that the vehicle may not be flawless despite its appealing appearance.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, describing it as one of the nicest 993 C4 Cabs available. @jibmaster1 noted its superb specifications and potential to enhance any Porsche collection. @MPM97turbo called it a special car, highlighting its desirable and thoughtfully modified features. @Type911 added a personal touch, sharing his long-term familiarity with the previous owner and praising the car's perfection, claiming it's the finest 993 he has ever encountered. Overall, the compliments focused on the car's aesthetic and collector appeal, with several comments emphasizing its low miles and meticulous care.
Neutral: Some commenters sought clarification regarding the car's ownership history and specific features. @Leica1 inquired about the installation of the sport seats, while @cruisecar88 asked whether the turbo bumper and side skirts were factory-installed or added later. The Seller, @SWVintage, addressed these queries, explaining that the modifications were done at the dealership with OEM parts, and clarified the ownership timeline involving the deceased owner and trust registration to settle confusion regarding the number of previous owners. This shows a mix of interest and inquiry but lacks emotional reactions to the car itself.
Negative: Criticism emerged related to the car's ownership record, adding an air of suspicion regarding its history. @Leica1 questioned how a car with only 8,000 miles could have multiple previous owners, while @dbrsf made a pointed remark about @frankbooth1's comment regarding the car's interior smell, suggesting it reflects an insular perspective. Additionally, @Poorshee expressed confusion over the ownership numbers, while @SWVintage had to clarify these mixed messages, which could indicate unresolved concerns about the car's past that might deter some potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has an impressive array of features, with @24601 describing it as an "amazing spec with every option available." The seller, @ttocs6991, highlights that the 2013 BMW X5 xDrive50i M Sport is a single owner car that was meticulously maintained and has excellent service records, indicating reliability and care throughout its life. The advertisement also mentions that the car runs and drives excellently, with all electronics in working order, and specifically notes the ice-cold AC and the absence of weird smells, reinforcing the vehicle's well-maintained condition.
Neutral: There seems to be some confusion regarding the 'Sport' button on the shifter and the 'Adaptive Drive' option, as pointed out by @DSTC_Off, suggesting that the vehicle may not have everything indicated in the listing. This commenter also notes that with the performance package, the car should actually produce 440 hp, not the stated 400 hp. @Truthserum engages in a minor discussion with @DSTC_Off about the precision of language in describing the features of the vehicle, suggesting that there may be more to consider than strictly what's listed.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the accuracy of the vehicle's features. @DSTC_Off mentions the lack of both the 'Sport' button and the 'Adaptive Drive' option, which raises questions about the vehicle's specifications based on the listing. This could lead to doubts about the completeness and reliability of the information provided by the seller, as well as potential discrepancies in performance expectations.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the 1967 Camaro, noting its impressive originality and condition. @LarryM remarked on the charm of survivor Camaros, especially with the appealing butternut yellow color. @Tommy951 and @Christop85 referred to it as a true time capsule and beautiful survivor, emphasizing that the car's original paint adds to its authenticity. @JohnF1966 highlighted the uniqueness of survivor cars, expressing hope that it remains unmodified. Commenters like @JayKay2430 and @1967CorvetteCoupe shared their enthusiasm for original vehicles, appreciating the car's historical significance and aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Comments included inquiries about the vehicle's features and condition. @Ez2conv and @JRPJR asked specific questions about the original documents and body moldings, while @Mr.Majestyk inquired about the brakes and radio functionality. Some discussions focused on technical aspects, like the possibility of paint touch-ups and the authenticity of the stripes, with input from @Whatsupwidat regarding the RPO option details. @Ibuild raised concerns about the aftermarket side moldings and potential complications related to their installation.
Negative: There were some doubts raised about the condition of the car, particularly regarding the body side moldings and potential issues from previous repairs. @Boones observed possible paint cracking, questioning if the car had been wrecked, while @65gt1ab and @66Malibu noted signs of overspray that could indicate repainting. @Ibuild expressed concern about the possibility of original paint being compromised by after-market modifications. Overall, while some noted the vehicle's beauty, there were clear reservations about its untouched condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing the C10 as a 'two-tone bronze and white delight' and praises the wonderful build, wishing good luck with the auction (GLWTA). This positive sentiment is supported by @Granddad50, who appreciates the truck's appearance but suggests providing additional pictures to potentially attract more bids and a higher price.
Neutral: Several commenters seek clarification on various aspects of the vehicle. @burnrubber49 asks whether the air conditioning is in working order, and @charolais inquires if the air conditioning needs a new pump. @greg_selvidge requests to confirm whether the bed is a short box or a long box, to which @lunchbocks2002 responds by indicating that it is a long bed based on the pictures and the SPID. @Trevorsund (The Seller) also confirms that the truck is indeed a long bed.
Negative: @Granddad50 raises concerns regarding possible rust, asking if there is any rust evident and suggesting that this information could impact the auction's success. @Trevorsund (The Seller) responds, stating there is light surface rust underneath and mentioning that some of the visible elements may be overspray of the bronze color. Overall, there is a cautious tone regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly concerning the underside.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning condition and unique color combination. @BaltazarCP exclaimed, "Wow!", while @ArabianKnight noted the auction excitement, saying, "This is going high!" Commenters like @ntntnt and @WAGONBOYTD echoed these sentiments, with the latter calling it "pretty incredible" and stating it is likely the lowest mileage 2012 on the market. @MIALM added appreciation for its final model year and wonderful color combination, while @Bucket_List_Cars predicted that it could become a sought-after collector vehicle soon.
Neutral: Comments from various users sought clarification on the vehicle's features and specifications. @FXRcR1 asked about a full-sized spare tire, which led to a discussion about the cargo mat's fitting. @Luke18917 (The Seller) responded, confirming it is not full-sized and noted the cargo mat might belong to a different model. Furthermore, @WAGONBOYTD provided links to details on the vehicle's build sheet, indicating there is considerable interest in the specifics of its design and features. Users like @nobuds inquired about service records, and @Luke18917 (The Seller) assured that such information would be made available.
Negative: On the downside, some users expressed concerns about the vehicle's price. @GABES404S questioned the valuation, stating that similar models in the UK rarely exceed $35K, while @yiliceo11 remarked, "46K? I guess I am not wealthy enough to drive a L322, LOL" indicating that the pricing might deter potential buyers due to its high demand. @WAGONBOYTD warned against getting too emotionally invested in the auction, cautioning others to be rational about bidding especially for a 13-year-old SUV. This skepticism about pricing and investment potential was echoed across different comments.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and presentation, calling it an absolutely stunning car and emphasizing the beauty of the Panther Black color, both in photographs and in person. @Probablywontwin stated it was a very impressive sale, while @jasonlbaptiste hailed it as the best R8 he has ever seen. @DNW4670 shared a similar sentiment, appreciating the photographic representation of the color and commenting on the attractive matte carbon fiber accents. @briangmarquis noted the rarity of the car, highlighting it as one of only two in that color combination, and @amazingcars_atl praised the meticulous care it has received, affirming that it stands out as one of the finest R8 Competitions on the market.
Neutral: Several users engaged with the auction details, asking questions about the vehicle's specs and features. @MyCoalBAT inquired about the MSRP, which was confirmed to be $210,250 by the seller, @Car_Concierge. Additionally, they asked if the car could pass California emissions and sought clarification on the surface rust observed in photos, prompting a detailed response from the seller about the oxidation not being an issue. Others, like @Kryder, questioned the number of previous owners, which led to a further explanation from the seller about the typical turnover for clients interested in high-end vehicles like this R8.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns regarding the condition and maintenance history of the vehicle. @Kryder noted the high number of previous owners for a 2015 car, expressing curiosity about the reasons behind that. @MyCoalBAT pointed out what seemed to be a grease-like substance in a photo, seeking clarification that the seller was able to address with a comment about oxidation. Additionally, @petrohead022 and @NCB755 asked about the tires' age and carbon cleaning, indicating potential past issues that could concern potential buyers. Overall, while the car drew admiration, these inquiries highlighted caution among some commenters.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express overwhelming enthusiasm about the ZL1 1LE, highlighting its rarity and performance capabilities. @Phillip_Shaffer details how one cannot build a comparison race car for anywhere near the asking price, emphasizing the value of the parts alone. @AHook88 believes the current price is a steal given that other models with similar mileage sell for much higher, forecasting that this ZL1 1LE will appreciate over time. Additionally, @KCleveland (The Seller) describes the vehicle as an 'unbelievable machine,' sharing a personal story of how difficult it was to obtain this rare model, further increasing its appeal.
Neutral: Several comments provide context about the vehicle's production numbers and specifications, with @Pacheco167 noting the production of only 47 units. The conversation also touches on the missed opportunity for a PDR (Paintless Dent Repair) feature, with @mlee129 questioning its absence. Commenter @BigSwole raises the point about the collector potential of the ZL1 1LE but also expresses skepticism about future value increases, suggesting the limited rarity compared to other models on the market.
Negative: Amidst the positive remarks, there are some concerns regarding the vehicle's very low mileage and potential issues related to use. Commenters like @Iggy807 and @KCleveland (The Seller) lament the lack of usage, suggesting it is disappointing that the seller did not enjoy the car. @BigSwole provides a more skeptical viewpoint, questioning the optimistic assessments of the ZL1 1LE's future value and highlighting concerns about its ride comfort as a street car. Additionally, there are accusations of misinformation regarding the production status of the last vehicle, creating some confusion about the model's rarity and ownership history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @LouFifer describes the car as 'the best Beetle beauty in a long time,' highlighting the vehicle's aesthetic appeal. @piepark68 praises the photography, particularly admiring the vibrant red paint. The seller, @911r, invites Beetle enthusiasts to appreciate their stunning red convertible, referring to it as a 'sweetheart' and a 'creampuff.' They underscore the car's smooth driving experience as a testament to its popularity, mentioning ongoing updates and additional content for interested buyers.
Neutral: Commenters like @Bchbound speculate on the car's reserve price, indicating the seller's previous winning bid of $30K. @CHS_Karl makes a note about the engine specifications, emphasizing the historical accuracy of the car's description while acknowledging its increasing rarity. @KRITIK points out a minor detail regarding the lighter's design, but otherwise endorses the car's overall quality, wishing the seller good luck with the sale.
Negative: @iamlost expresses concerns about the front hood latch's functionality and requests a driving video, indicating a desire for more confirmation about the vehicle's condition. @LouFifer also raises apprehensions about the 1200cc engine's capability to comfortably merge with modern freeway traffic, suggesting the need for potential modifications. The comments focus on specifics that detract from the excitement, such as seat belt requirements noted by @Kayemtee, which add to the car's vintage feel yet underline possible safety concerns.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MPM97turbo describes the vehicle as an "unstoppable companion" for his family of six, praising its value well beyond its price point. He highlights the truck's performance, noting that while it may eat brakes and tires if driven aggressively, he has had good results after adjusting his driving style. He emphasizes the GL550 as a luxury class leader in the three-row SUV market, recommending potential buyers to purchase with confidence.
Neutral: @genevamotorcars points out the vehicle's extensive service history, noting that while many complain about lack of service records, this vehicle has too many for some potential buyers. He offers insights into the vehicle's condition, stating that the rear suspension is in great shape, and suggests that the numerous brake replacements might be the result of the dealership overselling maintenance services rather than actual issues. @no.radar comments on the duality of service records, indicating that a large number might suggest problems with reliability or repeat failures, but acknowledges that different buyers may view these factors differently.
Negative: @PALLUARD expresses concern about the frequent replacement of components such as coils and front rotors, questioning whether it indicates harsh driving. He also notes the absence of rear suspension service records and raises concerns about the vehicle's reliability. @no.radar echoes this sentiment, pointing out that an overwhelming number of service records could suggest ongoing issues, which may deter some potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's features and performance. @QuiAudetAdipiscitur praised the Safari Gard rock rails and the truck's suitability for off-road use, remarking that it appeared to have been utilized as intended. @Bond1 (The Seller) enthusiastically assured that the vehicle runs smoothly and encouraged interested buyers to experience it firsthand. Commenters also appreciated the vehicle's strong and quiet engine, smooth transmission, and firm brakes, with @Cymbolt highlighting that the engine operates perfectly without noise or smoke.
Neutral: There were some inquiries and clarifications regarding the vehicle's specifications and condition, which prompted informative responses from @Bond1 (The Seller). Several commenters, such as @WagonBoytd and @Garagisti, asked specific questions about the vehicle's classification, oil lines, and other mechanical aspects. The seller's responses indicated a willingness to provide further details, including sharing videos that demonstrate the vehicle's performance and addressing concerns about possible modifications and its NAS certification status.
Negative: Some negative comments focused on the vehicle's imperfections and potential mechanical concerns. @Oddestball expressed worry about engine noise and timing chain bearing suggestions, while @Coug81 pointed out suspected spider cracks on the original windshield. @Bobbocostello inquired about body dents, noting imperfections on the fenders. Though @Bond1 (The Seller) acknowledged these issues, the overall sentiment remained largely positive, though some concerns about condition were raised.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commendations for the vehicle highlight its fun driving experience, with @XXX79 noting that having a 2001 Z06 and a newer 2024 C8 Z06 makes it difficult to determine which is more enjoyable. Several commentors praise the car’s overall condition and performance, suggesting it's a desirable model for enthusiasts. @Tobyallen expresses optimism about the car's ability to be driven without worrying about mileage, emphasizing how the C5 Z06's performance makes it a collectible car. @Longmire45 finds the car visually appealing, calling it a "nice example" and asserting that someone would acquire a prime vehicle. @C_Lmotorsllc (The Seller) states that the car handles great, drives well, and assures others about the tire situation, indicating satisfaction with its performance.
Neutral: Some comments delve into the technical aspects related to the vehicle's tires, focusing on their sizes and brands. @TonesVette mentions that while the vehicle's front tires are undersized and not the recommended performance tires, most drivers wouldn't notice a difference unless pushing the limits of performance. @Viviana07 suggests that finding matching sizes can be a challenge, but the adjustments made to the vehicle may not significantly impact driving performance. The discussion around tire selections illustrates a shared understanding of their importance, particularly among enthusiasts, while acknowledging the difficulty owners may face in sourcing the correct types.
Negative: Criticism arises primarily around the mismatched tire sizes on the vehicle. @Tobyallen flags this as an immediate concern, suggesting that it compromises the car's handling features designed by GM. Similarly, @TonesVette highlights that the current mismatched setup could affect performance during aggressive driving. @fiveomar points out that specific model years such as 2004 might present issues, particularly with redesigned fuel tanks, calling it a drawback for that year's Z06s. The technical discussions reflect a sense of caution among potential buyers regarding tire and maintenance considerations.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Yduhoux (The Seller) presents a fantastic vehicle that stands out with its great color combination and a powerful engine designed by a passionate builder. The car is well-sorted, ready to be enjoyed immediately, and equipped with a great sound system and air conditioning, enhancing the overall driving experience. Many users have commented on the investment put into upgrades and improvements since its purchase, indicating that the vehicle is in excellent condition and has been carefully maintained.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle have included inquiries about its specifications, such as the build year and features like side curtains and window inserts. @daniel550 asked for clarification on the build year, and @cryonstewart inquired about viewing the vehicle in person, indicating interest and engagement from potential buyers. @Yduhoux (The Seller) has addressed these questions with helpful information, maintaining open communication during the auction process.
Negative: Some potential bidders, like @glshoemaker, expressed concern about not being able to meet the seller's reserve price due to the seller's investment in the vehicle. Additionally, @Yduhoux (The Seller) shared personal reasons for selling, which may evoke empathy but also raises questions about the urgency of the sale. Overall, while the seller is enthusiastic about the car, there are hints of disappointment regarding the auction's outcome.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @flopez inquired about startup and idle videos, indicating an interest in the vehicle's performance and sound, which suggests they are actively looking for information that could reflect positively on the vehicle's overall condition. This type of engagement often points to a good level of enthusiasm and consideration for the vehicle's features.
Neutral: The comments reflect potential buyers' requests for videos that showcase the vehicle's startup and idle characteristics. This shows a general interest among users who are evaluating the vehicle, as they seek further details to assist in their decision-making process. No definitive opinions or outcomes regarding the vehicle's condition or appeal have been expressed.
Negative: There are no negative comments reflected in the request from @flopez, though the inquiry could imply a concern for the vehicle's performance if there is a lack of video evidence available. The absence of such content may lead potential buyers to question the seller's transparency or the vehicle's reliability.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @cdrusn: Beautiful detailing, car looks like new. @bfschiavon (The Seller): She really is a beauty! @gdnorrie: Beautiful car!
Neutral: @SitkaSpruce: Hmm…. Canada is right next door. This car deserves some attention! @charliebird123: @bfschiavon. Very pretty car, will look very much at home here in Nova Scotia. My question revolves around the hardtop stand. Does it breakdown or fold and would it fit inside the car for shipping? @bfschiavon (The Seller): The hard top stand can fold up and fit inside of the vehicle for shipping, no problem @charliebird123. @charliebird123: Thanks seller, I shall watch carefully till next Friday.
Negative: @charliebird123: @bfschiavon I’m not seeing any pics of the spare tyre or under floor area of trunk. Could you please add some. Thanks, charlie. @bfschiavon (The Seller): The tire is there in perfect condition with everything else. I am in Italy until the 29th and I will try to get you a picture of it in the meantime. Grazie! @gdnorrie: If I understand correctly, the engine oil was last changed in 2021?
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors express confidence in the vehicle's capabilities, particularly highlighting that it has always performed reliably. @Bdoyle87 (The Seller) assures potential buyers of the Jeep's mechanical reliability, stating it has never given them any trouble and has only been trailered for long distances.
Neutral: Several commentors are seeking clarification and additional details about the Jeep. @Philip_g questions the authenticity of the Sahara designation without specific features, while @Classyfellow inquires about shipping arrangements, indicating an interest in the vehicle despite the logistics involved. @Swan_Bird asks about the purpose of a box located behind the rear seat, showing curiosity about modifications.
Negative: There are concerns regarding the overall condition of the Jeep, as well as its suitability for long distances. @Classyfellow notes that shipping is disabled due to the vehicle not being water-tight, raising doubts about its ability to withstand the elements, which @Grambo echoes by asking if it could make a cross-country drive. Both raise valid points about potential shortcomings in the Jeep's design.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's color and style, with @georgepehanick noting the beautiful color combo and wheels. @jrb007 remarked on the uniqueness of the color and described it as awesome, while @natergater commented on the car being in terrific shape with a rare color combination. @TheStricks reminisced about a similar model they owned, highlighting its reliability and fun driving experience. @Twoods14 referred to the vehicle as amazing and underappreciated once sorted, and @Stucknreverse appreciated the color combo, indicating that the car has a solid aesthetic appeal overall.
Neutral: Comments about the car's emissions and modifications were prevalent, with many users seeking clarification on potential changes that could affect registration in California. @Cwest and @67benzboy discussed the importance of ensuring that the car's emission systems remained stock for compliance, with @67benzboy providing insight from personal experience with reimporting a similar vehicle to California. @huskyrider (The Seller) assured buyers that the vehicle is box stock and has no emissions problems, addressing buyer concerns, which indicates a proactive approach to maintaining transparency about the car's condition and history.
Negative: Several commenters pointed out specific concerns regarding the vehicle's physical state. @mikelaca raised issues about a dent and potential rust, prompting questions about cleaning and overall condition. @natergater noted the tachometer was a bit off, suggesting that the listing could have benefited from more pictures to showcase the vehicle's features and condition. @Rickn and @Stucknreverse asked detailed questions about the interior's condition, the performance of various components, and whether original wheels were available, reflecting concerns regarding the car's maintenance and potential unseen issues.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments praised the vehicle's sound and performance, with @88mr2 noting that the car sounds amazing. @DoctorLove recalled fond memories associated with a similar Corvette, emphasizing the nostalgic connection to the vehicle's design, while @greatnorth510 commented on the quality of a driving video that showcased its power and beauty. The dealer, @gtautolounge, received appreciation for providing clear information, such as engine specifications and the clean title status, which reassured potential buyers about the car's history and registration.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions about the car's specifications and registration status. @TedHopson inquired about the tire sizes, while @kevinckb6 expressed surprise at the horsepower, suggesting it could be higher based on engine size. @solidol and @gwn discussed the implications of the vehicle's title in California, with @gtautolounge clarifying that the car has a clean and clear CA title and current registration. Another commenter, @Moeski, sought further clarification on the vehicle's chassis number and its implications for future registrations.
Negative: A few concerns were raised regarding the vehicle’s registration and titling. @solidol questioned how the car was titled in California without the SB100, and @need2fillmygarage asked about the implications of its 1965 designation. @Moeski sought detailed verification of the title and chassis number, indicating a worry over potential future issues with registration. The inquiries suggest a level of caution among potential buyers regarding the legalities surrounding the car's registration status.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments reflect a positive appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and overall appeal. @boaboyoz describes the 992.1 4S coupe as 'seriously stylish in Guards Red over Slate Grey' and lauds the @seller as a 'cool dude.' Additionally, @UTCatala and @TurboChris express their admiration for the car, with @UTCatala calling it 'amazing' and @TurboChris complimenting its beauty, albeit with a note about seat specifications. The comments highlight the exciting nature and desirability of the vehicle, capturing the attention of potential buyers.
Neutral: The @seller, @lambogas, engages with various inquiries and expresses gratitude for the interest shown in the vehicle. @UTCatala asks specific questions about tire wear, illustrating that potential buyers are scrutinizing the car's condition. @Fortnight inquires about a DME report and the vehicle's date of manufacture, indicating that potential buyers are looking for authenticity and thoroughness in the information provided about the car. Furthermore, @Ro_JaBoy's request for cold start and driving videos suggests a level of interest in understanding the vehicle's performance, showcasing an engaging dialogue between the @seller and prospective bidders.
Negative: However, some comments carry a hint of skepticism. @Rogoben's comment, flagged as non-constructive, underscores potential doubts about the vehicle's features, while @Ro_JaBoy raises concerns regarding possible holes from a removed front plate holder, which could suggest apprehension about the car's integrity after modifications. @TurboChris's mention of wishing for different seat specifications implies that the car does not meet all preferences, hinting at some dissatisfaction. Overall, these mixed sentiments demonstrate that while there is excitement, there are also reservations and questions that potential buyers have about the vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle, a 1993 Porsche 964 Turbo 3.6 in Amazon Green Metallic, has garnered rave reviews for its stunning and unique color. @boaboyoz referred to it as a "fabulous and fantastic" example, emphasizing its divine qualities. Comments by @silverf360 and @ThrasherBear support this sentiment, noting how the color appears differently under various lighting conditions, often revealing vibrant hues of blue and green. @Cornbread expressed the beauty of the car while also highlighting its power and rarity, making it desirable to many enthusiasts. Overall, the vehicle has been praised not only for its aesthetics but also for the meticulous care it has received over the years, confirming its condition as "spotless" and "perfection."
Neutral: @CVLC and @AmazonGreen provided some clarification regarding the rarity of the Amazon Green Metallic color, stating that while it was initially seen as limited, it was actually available as a standard color option on various models from 1991 through 1994. @Symbolic_International (The Seller) reiterated that this specific color was only offered in 1993 for the Turbo 3.6 model, which adds to its unique appeal. Additionally, the vehicle's compliance with inspection standards and its matching numbers add to its value, although some commenters noted the complexities surrounding its smog certification for California buyers. @jerzeyboy730 even labeled the car a time capsule, hinting at its historical significance while also calling for a look at its documentation.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding the claims about the vehicle's rarity and color history. @CVLC pointed out the exaggeration, suggesting that Amazon Green was not particularly rare as it was available as a no-cost option. Commenters like @AmazonGreen even challenged the assertion of the color being exceptionally special, pointing out that twelve cars were painted this color in 1994. The maintenance history and the nature of the re-painting were also discussed, with @Wickswalker curiously weighing in on potential valuation impacts from external economic factors. Additionally, while the car has been praised for its aesthetics, comments about the antenna and its compliance with California emissions regulations injected some doubts about practicality for potential local buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the car, highlighting its beautiful presentation, color combination, and overall appeal. @VetteFan appreciates the stunning SC model and suggests performing a compression test for peace of mind. @1000songs and @Charleetuner both find the MOMO Heritage 6 rims visually striking and well-matched to the Guards Red color. Additionally, @cdeez, who visited the car, noted that it shows beautifully and has been well-kept, suggesting its potential as a fun vehicle. @elevationmotors, the seller, actively engages with potential buyers, offering constructive feedback and guidance throughout the discussion.
Neutral: Several commenters acknowledge the car's features without strong bias, providing constructive feedback or inquiries about specific aspects. @David_P points out the presence of a Wevo shifter, and @raynekat mentions the legal aspects of upgrading the car's exhaust system. The seller, @elevationmotors, addresses various questions regarding the title's status, emissions testing, and past service history. Additionally, @GeminiKoi raises concerns about the vehicle's mileage based on the speedometer swap, highlighting a discrepancy for potential buyers to consider. @elevationmotors clarifies these points effectively and promotes open communication regarding the auction process.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, a few criticisms and concerns emerge. @Aspen1984 raises a red flag about the auction's bidding fluctuations, implying suspicion around the bidding process. Additionally, @Halvo expresses reservations about the color red and non-Fuchs wheels, although they ultimately find merit in the combination with cork leather. @GeminiKoi's inquiry about potential hidden issues under the bonnet and previous repainting hints at cautious scrutiny from the community. Furthermore, @elevationmotors has to address various concerns about the car's mechanical history, such as questions regarding the top-end rebuild and chain tensioners, indicating that further transparency could be beneficial to maintain buyer trust.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @A.Ibrahimi (The Seller) has provided extensive information about the vehicle, including its original paint and maintenance details, stating that it has a new battery and recent oil change. Many users, like @Bjerken, express excitement about the Stagea and are eager to see more vehicles of this model stateside. @A.Ibrahimi also reassured potential buyers by confirming that the vehicle operates without issues and has all functional components, including super cold AC and heat, emphasizing a well-maintained condition.
Neutral: Comments from @Jspadafore and @1969Z50 show an interest in obtaining more specific details about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the CarVx auction sheet and potential rust issues at the strut towers. @craZee notes the increasing availability of these vehicles, hinting at a trend due to import regulations, while @spenceridge humorously refers to the car as an 'ultimate grocery getter.' This suggests varying perceptions about the vehicle's purpose and desirability.
Negative: Concerns about rust are raised by @DaveTea and @1969Z50, highlighting the reputation of the Stagea for rusting at critical points. @DaveTea mentions the presence of corrosion in some photos, which could deter potential buyers. @A.Ibrahimi addressed these worries by stating that he will provide further images of the strut towers and undercarriage, attempting to alleviate apprehensions about the car's condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, noting its remarkable appearance and excellent maintenance. @scottos highlighted the low mileage and well-maintained condition of the B7 RS4, calling it a joy to drive. @alfaraptor reminisced fondly about their time owning the car, describing it as a source of pure happiness. @knoxpainting865 shared excitement over the opportunity to potentially own such a rare example with low mileage, emphasizing its quality and tasteful modifications. The confidence expressed by @911r (The Seller), who detailed extensive maintenance records and outstanding vehicle condition, also contributed to the positive sentiment surrounding the vehicle.
Neutral: Some comments raised neutral inquiries regarding specific features and maintenance checks. @h2o_snow asked about oil consumption, leaks, and the condition of various vehicle components, while @Matt753210 sought clarification on the maintenance status of major items, including the clutch and carbon cleaning history. @TheBen mentioned the absence of the factory navigation system in this vehicle, a point @mercury26 echoed, noting that they had added similar features to their own vehicle. @guyc asked about the extra set of DRC shocks, indicating a neutral concern about their origin following a recall. These inquiries reflect a genuine interest in ensuring the car's performance and features without casting doubt on its quality.
Negative: Some negative sentiments emerged primarily from concerns about the vehicle's specifications and features. @TheBen expressed disappointment about the lack of the factory navigation unit, suggesting it could be a drawback for potential buyers. Additionally, @mekolard pointed to a mix of positive and negative feelings regarding the non-premium package, highlighting the absence of some desirable features that come with upgraded models. @Matt753210 pointedly questioned the history of the oil analysis mentioned in the maintenance records, implying that there may have been unresolved issues with the oil used previously. Overall, these comments indicated some reservations about certain aspects of the vehicle's configuration and history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @toyotaworshiper, the seller, provided detailed responses to several inquiries about the vehicle, highlighting its well-maintained condition. The air conditioning is confirmed to be fully functional, and there are no cracks or chips on the windshield. The seller also noted that the vehicle has been garage kept, is completely rust-free, and the paint is in very good condition, suggesting a history of careful upkeep. The interior, specifically the rear seats, is indicated to be in near immaculate factory condition, which may appeal to potential buyers looking for quality.
Neutral: Multiple commenters asked clarifying questions regarding the vehicle's features, including @Lope0124 inquiring about the neutral position in the transfer case, @boulder_cruiser questioning the nature of the rear seat belts, and @Rob910 seeking clarification on aftermarket wiring visible in a picture. Concerns raised also included requests for a driving video from @HabibiLC and questions about potential oil leaks from @Alex2526, indicating that interested buyers are gathering information to assess the vehicle's overall functionality and reliability.
Negative: Concerns were raised by commenters regarding potential issues with the vehicle. @Midengineracer speculated about the price remaining low if the seller did not respond to questions. @TheF3Z asked if the seller has identified a rattle during idle, suggesting possible mechanical concerns, while @Toyotayota took note of the speed chime and refrigerant type, implying that there might be unresolved issues affecting features of the vehicle. These inquiries coupled with concerns regarding oil consumption and overheating from other users show a level of uncertainty among prospective buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the car's beauty and luxury features. @daniel812 noted the impressive rear seat amenities, calling the Maybach a stunning example of automotive excellence. @FXRcR1 expressed admiration for the car's aesthetics, while @Bordeaux appreciated its elegant appeal compared to contemporary vehicles like the Rolls-Royce Phantom. Commenters also felt the vehicle stood out in the luxury segment, with @alanm96ss humorously contemplating its potential as a unique towing vehicle given its powerful V12 engine.
Neutral: Several commenters posed practical questions regarding the vehicle's specifications and condition. @alanm96ss inquired about the towing capacity, while @Metompkin1325 requested clarification about the vehicle's photo origin and any potential changes since the images were taken. The discussion touched on the vehicle's rear seat features, including car seat anchors, as mentioned by @pvo, indicating an interest in its functionality for families.
Negative: On the downside, numerous concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's maintenance costs and potential electrical issues. @CarObsessive warned that alternators can be notoriously expensive, creating a hefty repair bill down the line. @LenV12 highlighted the commonality of electrical problems in early Maybach models, suggesting buyers should be cautious. Some commenters, like @neilpierson25, criticized the seller's lack of engagement and the limited photos and videos provided, raising doubts about the seriousness of the listing.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciated the aesthetics and classic appeal of the vehicle, with @BuddyTheDog highlighting the car's association with iconic film scenes, particularly in "To Catch a Thief" where it starred alongside Cary Grant and Grace Kelly. @Knuckles-R-Busted expressed admiration for the car's gorgeous design, noting how the tires and color scheme complement its overall beauty. @Napolison described it as a stunning amalgamation of British elegance reminiscent of classic Bentley and Jaguar designs, evoking a sense of nostalgia for vintage automotive craftsmanship.
Neutral: Several individuals sought further clarification and details about the vehicle. @broodie and @Pablok had specific inquiries regarding the car's components, such as the battery type, the functioning of windshield wipers, and requests for additional images to validate the car's condition and features including the side windows and tonneau cover. @Jercarls (The Seller) promptly responded to these requests by confirming specifications like the 12-volt system and the working status of the windshield wipers, indicating a willingness to assist prospective buyers.
Negative: Despite the overall positive perception, some comments hinted at potential concerns, such as @MCH questioning the materials used in the car's interior, inquiring about the vinyl versus leather specifics. Additionally, @austinhealer pointed out an unusual detail regarding the turn signal/horn button assembly that deviates from typical designs. While these comments weren't overtly negative, they suggest that potential buyers might have reservations regarding authenticity or condition that could influence their purchasing decisions.
2007 Ford F-350 Super Duty Lariat Crew Cab Power Stroke 4×4
1FTWW31P07EB10386
Lot 189096
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The seller, @delder711, provides extensive clarifications about the vehicle, showcasing transparency regarding its specifications and modifications. The lift kit is purely suspension-based which enhances stability, and the inclusion of an aftermarket aluminum drive shaft improves performance. The recent improvements, such as undercoating and bed lining repairs, demonstrate a commitment to maintaining the vehicle's quality, with accompanying photos for verification also reflecting the meticulous work done on the truck.
Neutral: The comments show that the vehicle has certain modifications, including a modernized appearance with aftermarket mirrors and a significant EGR system alteration. @delder711 mentions that the truck is partially 'bulletproofed' by having the EGR deleted but notes that the studs have not been replaced, indicating a measure of reliability while also citing potential future repair considerations. The seller emphasizes the importance of checking local regulations due to the vehicle’s oversized tires and tinted windshield, an important point for bidders.
Negative: Several concerns are raised regarding the vehicle, particularly about the expired Pennsylvania inspection sticker and the minor oil leaks mentioned by @delder711. The seller acknowledges the EGR codes present and suggests solutions for the check engine light, which may suggest underlying maintenance requirements. Overall, while the seller is upfront about these issues, they may raise red flags for potential buyers who prioritize compliance and mechanical condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @axelrider appreciates the stock S5's aesthetic appeal, highlighting its good color combination and sporty rear differential. @nexusautobrokers, the seller, promotes the vehicle as a two-owner manual transmission model, noting that it has been well-maintained with regular oil changes. Additionally, @nexusautobrokers expresses enthusiasm for the driving experience, mentioning they were impressed with the manual S5, particularly in comparison to other sports cars. Apart from its visual appeal, @Skijump36 shares positive feedback on its performance capabilities, emphasizing the platform's power and unique supercharger sound.
Neutral: There are inquiries from commenters seeking further information about the vehicle's history and condition. @Jthompson7 requests details about oil change records and notes potential inconsistencies in paint color on specific parts of the car. @nexusautobrokers responds that some service records may not appear on Carfax and mentions plans to confirm paint meter readings. A different commenter, @Dutch1134, asks for tire date codes, which the seller acknowledges and promises to provide. @demrimz is curious about specific parts' inclusivity, demonstrating potential buyer interest but not raising strong concerns.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @Jthompson7 questions the discrepancies in paint color and whether certain parts may have been resprayed, despite the absence of accident records on Carfax. This highlights a potential lack of transparency about the vehicle's history. Furthermore, @JoReHj inadvertently flagged content as unhelpful, indicating some confusion or dissatisfaction in the purchasing process. @nexusautobrokers acknowledges the oversight, which may hint at the complexities in communication regarding the vehicle sale.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ForzaMinardi shared a positive experience with their own similar vehicle, praising its performance and versatility on long drives, indicating that the Jaguar XKE is a fun and usable classic car. They emphasized how great it is for touring, suggesting that this model is thrilling to drive and well-suited for road trips, which might encourage prospective buyers about the car's capabilities. The enthusiasm in their comments could attract interest from potential buyers who value performance and practicality in classic cars.
Neutral: @shallowguy pointed out that the vehicle's color is actually Signal Red rather than Regency Red, a detail that was validated by @bringatrailer, who acknowledged the color update. Additionally, @Dan_M. noted the choice of the steering wheel as unusual compared to the original and suggested that the seller provide more detailed undercarriage photos. There seems to be an ongoing discussion among users about specific aspects of the car's features, such as the type of carburetors and the bonnet strut configuration, which shows that the community is engaged in accurately assessing the vehicle's details.
Negative: @EandAnF raised concerns regarding the reported features of the car, indicating that the bonnet strut does not match what is expected based on the production year. @Ved expressed uncertainty about the air conditioning status, implying a missing feature that some buyers might look for in classic cars. The comments reflect a level of skepticism regarding the car's specifications and build details, which could potentially deter buyers wanting a fully original or completely functional vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is highlighted for its uniqueness, being the only SWB VDP in the X300 series with a four-seater configuration, as noted by @sean65. @mojocoggo describes it as a lovely car, emphasizing its excellent mechanical condition with all features working properly, including A/C and sunroof. The interior has been meticulously cleaned, making it look and smell incredible, and the driving experience is characterized as peaceful and relaxing. Commenters like @Kiwiterry and @jaycypraea endorse the vehicle's reliability, with the latter recalling their own positive experience maintaining one for several years.
Neutral: There is a discussion about the vehicle's seating capacity, with @944play clarifying that it has five seatbelts, which @sean65 initially did not realize. Commenters also bring up various aspects of the car, such as the unique dashboard design preferred by some, and the aftermarket stereo system, which has garnered mixed opinions. @Crosbeian and @V12LUV inquire about the radio's compatibility with the trunk-mounted CD changer and the condition of the original wiring. @Borealis116 inquired about the passing smog certificate, which @mojocoggo confirmed was recently obtained.
Negative: Some concerns are mentioned regarding the vehicle's cosmetic imperfections, such as typical door dings and a small tear in the driver's seat storage pocket, as noted by @mojocoggo. @V12LUV expresses skepticism about a green residue on the bell housing, questioning its nature and the seller's explanation, which suggested it was coolant residue but was later cleaned off easily. Nevertheless, the overall sentiment remains positive, as the car is still seen as a beautiful and desirable vehicle despite these minor issues.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments praised the vehicle's aesthetics and features. The beautiful Magma Red exterior and Charcoal interior were frequently highlighted, with commenters expressing admiration for the overall look. The inclusion of luxury features such as the AMG Sport Package, Bi-Xenon headlights, and Bose stereo system received commendations, accentuating the vehicle's luxury appeal. Many recognized the car's low mileage of 34,000 miles as a significant positive aspect, suggesting it is a well-maintained example of the R230 SL500. The no reserve auction format also prompted excitement among potential bidders, creating a buzz around the sale.
Neutral: A range of neutral inquiries and clarifications were made regarding the vehicle's features. @JayMeilstrup specifically questioned the description of the two-tone leather seats, seeking clarity on whether it reflects two shades of charcoal gray or a different color scheme. @aegmotorsports promptly responded, confirming that the interior features a combination of black and charcoal tones. These interactions indicate potential buyers' interest in understanding all aspects of the car while also showcasing the seller's willingness to engage and provide detailed information, contributing to a transparent auction process.
Negative: There were no significant negative comments regarding the vehicle itself, but there was an underlying concern about the representation of the interior color in the listing photos. Some prospective bidders showed hesitation, with a hint of skepticism about whether the imagery accurately captured the two-tone aspect of the leather seating. However, this concern was promptly addressed by @aegmotorsports, which alleviated some of the doubts expressed by commenters. Overall, the interaction revealed that while potential buyers were generally positive about the vehicle, there were minor uncertainties regarding its visuals that needed clarification.
2,200-Mile 2022 Ford Mustang Shelby Super Snake Speedster 6-Speed
1FATP8FF1N5121641
Lot 189087
Dealer
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @jeffcap64 congratulated the bidders on a strong bid, reflecting a positive atmosphere for the auction. @NVGT350 shared a humorous anecdote about their own auction experiences, highlighting the excitement involved, while @SinCityAuto (The Seller) expressed enthusiasm about the auction's progress, especially praising the car's exceptional features and appealing to buyers to ask questions. @Dolphinsfan remarked on the value of the car and congratulated @Rippy on what appeared to be a successful bid, reinforcing the positive reception to the bidding process.
Neutral: @Raking initially questioned if the vehicle was a charity item due to its pricing, showing some curiosity about the market dynamics. There were comments such as @9mile79 sharing recent auction prices for similar vehicles, providing context to the vehicle's value without issuing any direct judgments. Overall, discussions about bidding strategies and auction dynamics seemed to reflect a mix of contemplation and speculation without strong bias.
Negative: @Rippy voiced frustrations about past bidding experiences, suggesting a cautious approach to bidding in a potentially soft market, indicating a lack of confidence in the auction's outcome. @Rippy also expressed disdain for comments from experts who lacked practical bidding experience, which reveals a critical attitude towards some commentary in the auction sphere. Furthermore, exchanges with @CarToys stirred tensions as @Rippy misunderstood @CarToys' enthusiasm, leading to confusion regarding the nature of their previous remarks.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @bavarianhotwheels praised the vehicle, noting it is the last of the M5s in a great specification, expressing regret about the direction the new M5 series has taken. @Calli74 also shared positive sentiments about the auction with a comment indicating they love the car's spec and wish the seller the best of luck with the sale. Furthermore, @PAEnglish11 highlighted that a significant recall issue concerning the expansion tank has been addressed, along with the replacement of several fuel injectors, suggesting the vehicle is in a better condition now.
Neutral: @Rcscott123 (The Seller) provided relevant information regarding the vehicle's history, clarifying that any damage occurred before it was certified preowned and confirming the absence of paint protection film (PPF). They also answered inquiries about the tires, indicating they were replaced as part of the certified preowned process, and remarked on the recommended maintenance for rod bearings based on Google searches. They shared the horsepower and torque specifications of the M5 Competition and noted modifications with DINAN parts, although exact performance numbers were not available.
Negative: @BadOne inquired about the details of the damage, suggesting concerns over the vehicle's condition. @Joe-BMW criticized the presentation of the car, remarking on the dust and fingerprints in the photos and expressing that the car could have been presented more attractively, which they believed could significantly affect the final selling price. Additionally, @Comfortablepants reacted negatively about the inclusion of a sunroof in the vehicle, finding it unappealing, and @SlowNRusty questioned the necessity of rod bearings replacement after a certain mileage, highlighting potential future maintenance issues.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors express a lot of enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting its overall appeal and rarity. @bbilly encourages the owner to invest in improvements, suggesting that a slight financial boost could transform the car into a 'chic magnet cruiser.' @JohnF1966 commends the quality of the headlight bucket fit, noting its distinction on the platform. Further, @BigTanks and @RedAndGreen highlight the rarity of this specific '67 model, emphasizing its big block delete feature and categorizing it as an exceptional find.
Neutral: Several observations were made regarding the vehicle's components and condition. @61vet inquires about the engine's rebuild status and requests pictures of engine pad numbers, which @JPoer1970 (The Seller) clarifies are available in the listing. @Chevelles asks about the process for adding air conditioning to the Corvettes, with @JimmoVette sharing his experience of successfully installing VintageAir in his own vehicle, shedding light on the potential for upgrades.
Negative: There is a lack of critical or negative feedback in the comments about the vehicle, indicating a generally favorable perception among commenters. No specific concerns or issues with the car were mentioned that would detract from its appeal.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's authenticity and condition. @braktrcr was impressed that the vacuum wipers were operational, highlighting the engine's great sound and wishing luck with the sale. @boaboyoz described the Scout as a 'cool build' and expressed excitement, while @tlcamg emphasized the vehicle's genuine nature, stating it meets expectations for a 63 Scout. @Scout_Geek noted its clean appearance, while several users celebrated its originality, with @Undertaker appreciating that it hadn't been overly modified.
Neutral: Several commenters shared insights about the vehicle's historical context and specifications. @JimAllen provided detailed information about its model year production and components, clarifying possible confusion about its VIN and highlighting the vehicle's features indicative of its early trim. @markd509 (The Seller) addressed various inquiries related to the vehicle's condition, missing pieces like the rear seat, and the Line Setting Ticket (LST), showing openness to feedback. Others discussed technical aspects involving the chassis number and potential discrepancies.
Negative: Some negative aspects surfaced regarding potential alterations and missing original parts. @JimAllen noted discrepancies in the vehicle's original components compared to its current state, including non-original seats and bumpers. @Scout_Geek commented on the transcription error within the VIN, which could confuse potential buyers. Additionally, @Mchouse raised concerns about the influx of new accounts participating in the auction, leading to uncertainty about the integrity of the bids.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments exhibit a high level of enthusiasm and admiration for the 1976 Toyota FJ40, highlighting its excellent condition as well as its appealing design. @TacomaLX (The Seller) notes the FJ's impressive appearance and well-maintained status, with an exciting backstory tied to a prominent car collector. @Knuckle47 compliments the vehicle as a 'frame waxer’s dream,' while @mef0629 and @Hostaman3 echo similar sentiments, emphasizing how solid and clean the FJ40 looks, praising its originality and aesthetics. The color of the vehicle is particularly favored, with @Emelton24 highlighting it as the best color for an FJ. Overall, many comments reflect a very positive view of the vehicle, noting its historical value and pristine condition.
Neutral: Several comments include questions and observations that are neither entirely positive nor negative. @pcough and @kentsantabarbara raise concerns about whether the FJ40 would pass California smog emissions requirements, prompting discussion about its original engine, emissions equipment, and the clarity of the VIN. @TacomaLX (The Seller) responds to these queries, providing information about compliance with emissions standards, which gives potential bidders clarity. However, there is also some debate about the originality of certain vehicle components, like the side mirrors, discussed by @RTH5555 and @wngrog, indicating varying opinions on what is considered original versus aftermarket parts. This neutral commentary serves to foster a more informed assessment of the vehicle's condition.
Negative: A few comments express concerns about the FJ40, focusing on imperfections and possible inconsistencies. @RTH5555 mentions some rust spots and questions the originality of the side mirrors and rear speakers, which some see as not conforming to expected standards for such a classic vehicle. @Hostaman3 also warns that the new owner should address paint bubbles on the rear corners promptly. These comments indicate a level of skepticism regarding the vehicle's overall condition, contrasting with the more positive perceptions shared by other commenters. Additionally, the uncertainty surrounding the vehicle’s restoration history discussed by @Chase68 raises some doubts about the authenticity of the FJ40's current state.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle for its striking aesthetics and performance features. @littlehandegan expressed love for the 991 model, while @artpirate333 called it "drop-dead gorgeous" in Guards Red, stating that the color unexpectedly captures their attention. Others, such as @GDogg and @boaboyoz, highlighted unique aspects of the car like the red floor mats and the delightful color combination of Guards Red with a black and beige interior, emphasizing the care put into the vehicle's build and maintenance.
Neutral: The comments show a mix of curiosity and detailed questions about specific aspects of the car, such as the black versus body color louvers on the rear deck lid raised by @Fache_Welt and the confirmation of noises during the driving video discussed by @survey4life and @Sharkthecat. The seller clarified that the engine lid louvers had been swapped to black and addressed the noise issue, attributing it to the camera mount rather than the car itself, reassuring potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, some concern arose regarding potential issues like the noise identified in the in-car audio during the driving video. @survey4life and @Sharkthecat both noted a rattling sound, leading to speculation on the cause. @Golaurent raised a valid question about the completion of the 40k service which includes new spark plugs, hinting at possible maintenance oversights that buyers might want to investigate.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the car’s aesthetics and historical significance. Commentors like @MJP2021 and @nucleonic highlight the vehicle's design and comfort, emphasizing the 'amaze-balls' seats and overall cool factor. Enthusiasts like @FarlandClassic and @urQed530 appreciate the original, unmodified state of the car, reflecting on its status as a time capsule from the 1980s. The unique sound of the 5-cylinder engine garners praise from many, including @lovecars and @hlweeks1, who fondly recall their experiences with similar models, emphasizing the vehicle's engaging driving experience.
Neutral: Several commentors provide useful information about the car without strong bias either way. @911r (The Seller) reassures potential buyers about the car's condition, discussing the Carfax report and clarifying the status of various components, particularly addressing concerns about a potential accident. The comments from @Tyreguru and @Frederal emphasize the craftsmanship and condition of the vehicle, while @Dave.quattro and others express a desire for more information, such as driving videos, to understand the car's performance better. These insights help create a well-rounded picture without overt promotion or criticism.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding minor issues, particularly from @pme0214 and @ISeeInHD, who note potential alignment problems related to a previous incident or repair. Comments from @AUTOFI and @racingiron discuss the possibility of a vacuum leak and mention the need to inspect specific parts for proper alignment. @andy7777 and others express disappointment with Audi's lack of support for older models, highlighting a frustration among enthusiasts regarding parts availability and restoration limitations. These points reflect a cautious approach to the car's condition, contrasting the overall positive sentiment surrounding its historic and aesthetic appeal.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @RungeGator describes the vehicle as a gorgeous car, praising its remarkable condition despite harsh weather conditions, calling it the best sedan ever built. @BMWE90Guy agrees, labeling it the best 5 series ever made. @powertechselect (The Seller) highlights its unique features such as manually adjustable sport seats and the interest it generated due to its rarity. @Ives supports this notion, citing his experience with the engine and its longevity, asserting it's one of the best long-term BMWs with impressive performance. @SteveTheodore recommends bidding with confidence due to the amazing track record of the seller, which adds to the overall positive perception of the vehicle.
Neutral: Many onlookers, including @TJMaximus and @MonteCutlass, express their affection for the vehicle while reminiscing about their own experiences with similar models. @DirkGently points out that the 1997 model features the M Sport suspension, though it lacks some features of later models, which provides valuable information for potential buyers. @powertechselect (The Seller) actively engages with comments, answering inquiries and verifying functional aspects of the vehicle, fostering a sense of community and enthusiasm around the auction.
Negative: @Trenda brings up concerns about the cost of repairing visible dents on the car, indicating some apprehension regarding its cosmetic condition. Meanwhile, @rsweibel reflects on missing their own similar model and refers to the vehicle as a bad-ass muscle car, suggesting that while there is a nostalgia for the vehicle's performance, there are also shadows of doubt regarding potential maintenance issues. However, none of the comments indicate significant deterrents to purchasing the vehicle, rather some hints of caution about upkeep.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly praising its unique color and overall appearance. @Collectibleclassics noted the incredible color, while @NCRSmaniac described the vehicle as the best looking of the ZR1s, highlighting its stunning color. @TimePeace even claimed it might be the best color they've ever seen on a Corvette, calling it 'cool as all get out' that the seller has been the original owner for 35 years. The driving videos shared by the seller were also well-received, with @BAM2020 and @Msirel complimenting the visual appeal and sound of the car, saying it showcases how a muscle car should be driven.
Neutral: Commenters discussed various mechanical details about the vehicle. @Glenn930 pointed out that the tires had been replaced in 2006 and sought opinions on their longevity despite the low mileage, sparking a debate among members about the necessity of replacing tires after a certain age, especially for high-performance vehicles. @67numberfive, the seller, clarified that everything works on the car, with the mention of a common airbag light issue that may require attention. Additionally, some comments mentioned the minor seat discoloration, which was explained by the presence of sheepskin seat covers since new.
Negative: Concerns regarding the car's condition and potential issues were raised by several commenters. @TurboWagon and @C4geek commented on the vehicle's old tires and highlighted the importance of safety, suggesting that the tires should be replaced regardless of mileage. @fxkenny noted the potential damage a blown tire could cause to the vehicle's body, while @alco4k shared that the airbag system of the 1990 model is particularly challenging to repair. Moreover, @cranked_up requested clarification on scratches mentioned in the description, indicating some unfinished details that the seller needed to address.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Baur2002 praised the bike for its beauty and the owner's care, noting it would complement high-end models like BMW GS and Ducati Multistrada. @Motoplant highlighted the extensive work done on the bike, including a new replacement tank and professional paint job, ensuring it looks ready for the riding season with only around 2,000 miles on it. The detailed craftsmanship and the unique white trellis frame were also points of admiration shared by various commenters, commending the attention to detail that distinguishes this Bimota model.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed curiosity about the bike's specific features and maintenance, with @Maybeillbuyit asking about the issues related to the original tank and the availability of ethanol-free gas in Canada. @Multistrada1 inquired about the color matching of the bike to alternatives by Bimoto and mentioned personal interests in owning a Bimota to complement their Ducati. @two-cycler2 shared their experience with the bike layout, discussing size suitability and feedback on the bike's throttle sensitivity, suggesting adjustments might be necessary for larger riders.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns regarding rider comfort, particularly for those who may be taller or heavier. @Two-cycler2 mentioned that the DB6 isn't designed for large riders, and @Multistrada1 specifically questioned whether someone 6 feet tall would fit comfortably. While the concerns were balanced with positive feedback about the bike, there seemed to be a caveat that potential buyers needed to consider regarding ergonomics and sizing before making a purchase.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its strong appeal, with many enthusiasts praising its overall beauty and rarity. @uscmanrob noted that it's yet another beautiful ride from RAMC, while @Messierp123 expressed excitement about the unique silver color without the 10th-anniversary package and the desirable 400 4-speed specification. Others, including @BaronVonZeppelin and @Tmagda, echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing the model's performance and desirability, solidifying it as a standout example of the Trans AM series. This excitement is further supported by comments from @JoeSketti and @MPreston454, who shared their own positive experiences with the seller's past vehicles, touting their quality and originality, which contributes to a strong overall impression of the car.
Neutral: Several comments reflect inquiries and discussions around the vehicle's condition and originality. @Lochinvarski and @Drumlin pointed to the paint meter readings, questioning if the paint is all original, and @restoreamusclecar (The Seller) addressed these concerns by explaining the original condition while noting possibilities of minor touch-ups over the years. @bkrug and @shelbymann70 engaged in discussions about paint thickness norms and factory practices, indicating a well-informed audience analyzing the vehicle from a knowledgeable perspective. The conversation about the unique features of this model, such as the lack of factory air conditioning and the unusual paint treatment, suggests a thoughtful exploration of what makes this Trans AM noteworthy while acknowledging its place in the broader context of automotive history.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the authenticity and condition of specific vehicle components. @Cafe questioned the rust found in the rear end and driveline, contrasting it with the otherwise clean appearance of the car. @shelbymann70 and @bkrug expressed skepticism regarding the paint thickness measurements, highlighting a common sentiment among car enthusiasts wary of potentially misleading representations. @CincyClassic and @restoreamusclecar (The Seller) discussed modifications and potential replacements of original parts, such as the steering wheel and shifter, while some participants, like @lunchbocks2002, expressed hesitance to bid due to concerns regarding alterations and originality. Such concerns indicate a divide between enthusiastic appreciation for the car and cautious scrutiny surrounding its provenance.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed a lot of excitement and admiration for the 1989 Porsche 930 Slant Nose Coupe, highlighting its rarity and historical significance. @2002s54 called it 'Nice^10', while @Bubbarut appreciated the car's unique features. Others, like @69_911e and @TommyBruin, referred to it as an iconic vehicle, with @56Chevy210 reminiscing about its timeless design and inspiring nostalgia. @CarCaveSRQ (The Seller) emphasized the thorough documentation supporting the car's history and condition, which has 31,600 miles and has been well-maintained and completely overhauled, further reassuring potential buyers.
Neutral: Some commenters sought clarification on specific aspects of the car. @Bubbarut inquired about the A/C conversion, and @356dax requested details on the actual mileage and the rationale behind the extensive $75,000 rebuild following low mileage. @Sgt.Shultz provided thorough observations, balancing his praise with constructive critiques of the car's condition, pointing out the desirability of certain modifications and the necessity for further clarification on some mechanical details. Overall, participants were actively engaged in discussing the vehicle's features and its performance history.
Negative: On the downside, there were some concerns about aspects of the car's maintenance and condition. @Sgt.Shultz noted that some features like the driver's seat appeared worn despite the low mileage, questioning the car's usage history, while @Scott_S remarked that the current bid does not cover the car's MSRP, rebuild costs, and sales tax, casting doubt on the bidding process. Additionally, suggestions from commenters such as @Fieldsy72 regarding emissions testing did raise concerns about potential issues in states with stricter regulations. Though discussion was mostly positive, these nuances reflect the cautious approach some potential buyers are taking.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @39mercman praised the car as a "nice little car" and noted its potential to become a "mean machine Hotrod" with some modifications, or that it could simply be enjoyed as is. @TonyDCarGuy expressed appreciation for the car's vintage appeal, describing it as 'refreshing' and embodying the essence of 'old-school.' @genelaroe thanked the seller for providing honest photos that showed the car's minor flaws, which do not diminish its enjoyment factor. @BOWSERBOY1950 expressed affection for the vehicle, stating, "How can you not love this old girl!" @mark_99 complimented the car's 'cool patina'.
Neutral: @Rbate (The Seller) provided detailed insights into the vehicle's condition, reassuring that the rear subrails are mostly intact but have small holes, indicating areas that may require repairs. He also confirmed the corrosion situation, stating there is no corrosion on the original frame and that the vehicle's paint appears to be thick enamel rather than lacquer. @foundsteel inquired about the VIN, leading to @Rbate confirming that the VIN number on the frame matches the one on the title, addressing potential concerns about the car's paperwork. The documentation and history of the car's ownership have some complexities as mentioned by @Old_Ned and @mark_99, who both expressed interest in any available historical images or documentation that could provide more context to the car's past.
Negative: Some comments touched on concerns about the car's condition and the potential need for repairs, specifically regarding issues with the subrails and the structural integrity of the frame. @Rbate acknowledged some damage in certain areas while expressing his belief that the car does not require new subrails. @The_Art_Doctor raised a practical concern about the functionality of the carburetor, questioning whether it leaks when fuel is left on overnight, indicating possible worries about the car's operational reliability.
|
|