Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments reflect a deep admiration for the Lamborghini Revuelto, with users praising its stunning design, incredible performance, and advanced features. @carfreak1981 finds it interesting, while @SiliconAutoGroup highlights its exceptional specifications. @dantheman4 calls it hands down the best driving car they've ever owned, noting the comfort and driving experience. The car is appreciated for its ability to blend luxury and performance, with @boaboyoz describing it as a 'spectacular spicy Revuelto'. Users like @fandor express joy in driving the car, emphasizing its thrilling performance and unique sound, and others like @demoodmai find it visually striking. Overall, the Revuelto is celebrated as a state-of-the-art supercar that excites both enthusiasts and potential buyers.
Neutral: Neutral comments often seek clarification about the value and specifications of the vehicle. For instance, @MPal and @SiliconAutoGroup inquire about the window sticker and MSRP, respectively, showcasing a practical interest in the details of the car. Others, like @Valiantjim, express mixed feelings about the direction of Lamborghini's design and performance, reflecting on the changing nature of supercars in modern times. @waterpix raises concerns about the power level being manageable for inexperienced drivers, while others like @Lambojoe1 compare its pricing with current market trends. This general curiosity conveys an awareness of the car's position in a competitive luxury market without strong opinions expressed either way.
Negative: Some comments express discontent, primarily regarding the car's perceived lack of 'soul' or 'engagement' compared to older models. @fastlp, for example, claims that the Revuelto lacks the excitement of earlier Lamborghini models, reiterating a preference for older cars that offer a more visceral driving experience. Similarly, another user expresses skepticism about the vehicle’s appeal, mentioning a lack of enthusiasm in owning a modern supercar with electric components. Additionally, @fastlp suggests that the Revuelto feels too much like an Audi in terms of its interior quality. This sentiment is echoed in discussions about the auction process where some believe that market manipulations and inflated dealer prices might negatively impact the Revuelto's value, as mentioned by @johnjohn312561 (The Seller) in response to critics.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the Lexus LFA as a stunning vehicle, with @skonker referring to it as 'the pinnacle of car-makery' and complimenting its seductive design. @SteveTheodore emphasized its excellence in engineering, describing it as the 'greatest of all time' for ICE-powered cars. Additionally, @Dollycat3 found it to be 'absolutely sexy' and 'timeless', while @SupraFreak appreciated its engine sound, calling it 'sublime'. Other commentators also expressed excitement about the car's rarity and desirability, noting its meticulous documentation and engineering legacy as reasons for its appeal.
Neutral: The auction for this specific LFA, with just over 2,100 original miles, has attracted a diverse range of comments. @Gberger and @parshooter engaged in a light-hearted discussion about the vehicle's sound, with @parshooter noting the lack of comments on the car's auditory experience. Various users shared personal anecdotes, such as @Bikeric regretting not purchasing one at a lower price in 2012. @NatWin inquired whether the LFA was present at a recent event, showing the interest in its attendance at car gatherings.
Negative: Not all comments were entirely positive, as some users expressed skepticism or a sense of humor regarding the LFA's value and perception. For instance, @craZee humorously juxtaposed a Kia Soul with the LFA, and @letthegypsyhaveit sarcastically suggested that there was nothing to see regarding the car. Additionally, @jpeirce reflected on a past missed opportunity to purchase an LFA, describing himself as an 'idiot' for confusing it with another model. Overall, while there are few outright negative criticisms of the vehicle, there was a playful undercurrent of jealousy and regret among some commenters.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments about the vehicle express admiration for its aesthetics and rarity. @stforte praised it as a "beauty," while @HarrisCountyDriver remarked on the excitement around its availability, calling the M3 GT "amazing." @bluebimmers echoed these sentiments, complimenting its color and originality. Sellers, @AnimoyaGarage, highlighted the car's well-documented history, having undergone $10,000 in servicing to keep it in excellent condition, which seems to resonate with potential buyers looking for a reliable classic. Enthusiasts like @jaysonva view it as one of the better examples of M3 GTs they've encountered, appreciate its original features, and see it as a practical collectible that can be enjoyed without guilt.
Neutral: Several comments delve into the technical aspects and history of the M3 GT, showcasing the automotive knowledge within the community. @bmwm1 raised a question about the car's rear wing, indicating curiosity about its specifications. The seller provided detailed explanations about the car's service history and components, addressing inquiries from users like @Stavelot regarding specific areas of the vehicle's subframe. There was also discussion from @AHLong and @Braymond141 about options available at the time of manufacturing, such as the sunroof and air conditioning. This technical dialogue reflects a shared interest among enthusiasts in understanding the intricacies of the model.
Negative: Conversely, some comments raised concerns about potential technical issues or features that could be seen as drawbacks. @bluebimmers pointed out that the car seemed to lack a center mount brake light, which could lead to legal issues depending on the buyer's location. @Stavelot asked about unpainted areas on the subframe, hinting at possible flaws in its restoration or maintenance. Additionally, @AnimoyaGarage acknowledged an intermittent issue with the passenger side mirror adjuster and noted that the air conditioning might not perform optimally on hot days. These discussions introduce elements of caution for prospective buyers aware of such details.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's stunning aesthetic and unique specifications. @GDogg highlights the eye-catching seat inserts, while @MJP2021 describes it as an 'absolute stunner.' Enthusiasts like @JaBronLames emphasize the charm and character of the car, reaffirming that the specification is what dreams are made of. @stathios praises the 500E as one of the best examples he's seen, noting the exceptional factory color combination. Overall, there is a strong consensus among various users that the car is visually impressive and retains a high level of mechanical integrity, with @Luz_do_sol commenting on the well-maintained condition of the interior and the functionality of its features.
Neutral: Several comments suggest a keen interest in the vehicle's history and production details. @OTSandCo (The Seller) provides valuable context about the car's origins, mentioning it was serviced well throughout its life, and detailing the production statistics of its relatively rare color. Others, like @Aero_I, share their experiences importing similar models, supporting @OTSandCo's claims about the rarity and delivery specifics of the Bornite color. Additionally, @Eagle01 discusses the reliability of 500E models based on his ownership, while @donkster reflects on the history of the 500E's variations in color, showing a connection between its heritage and present value.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive remarks, a few commenters raise concerns regarding specific aspects of the vehicle. @rxistkj questions whether a California smog inspection has been completed, leading to a clarification from @SockPuppet about the car's registration in Montana to avoid emissions issues. @FRC_C5 inquires about any known mechanical problems needing immediate attention, to which @OTSandCo reassures that none have been identified. @fuenfhundertE points out a potential issue regarding an asbestos warning sticker, suggesting buyers should be cautious about importation challenges. While these concerns are minimal compared to the overall enthusiasm, they do highlight some practical considerations for potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @jka73 expressed excitement over the listing of another SC/Rambler on BaT so soon after the last one sold, wishing good luck to the seller. @theforce88 described the car as beautiful and wished the seller good luck with the auction. @AMXDude praised the stunning condition of the SC/Rambler, highlighting the immaculate white undercarriage and stating that it was beyond their budget. @UNGN commented positively on the restoration, noting the appropriate modifications from the AMO Nationals and sharing insights on how modified cars were judged more favorably than stock cars. @bikerfox recounted their enjoyable ownership experience with a similar vehicle, suggesting potential buyers check for engine noise issues, which reflects a passionate engagement with the car community.
Neutral: Several commenters remarked on the SC/Rambler's unique design and historical significance, noting their rarity and appeal. @Vtec4ever recalled seeing one in person at a muscle car dealership and likened it to something Captain America would drive. @Dewaynea contributed commentary on the engine stamping process and how documentation worked at the time of production, which adds historical context to the vehicle's significance. @66Malibu and @Drakemi1 asked about potential issues with the vehicle's drivetrain and engine, showing curiosity about the car's performance and condition.
Negative: Comments also brought attention to some potential concerns regarding the vehicle. @firebird301 sought clarification about the vehicle's engine originality, expressing doubts about the claim of having a matching numbers drivetrain. @Drakemi1 noted possible leaks indicated by antifreeze under the car and raised concerns about the paint and bodywork, asking about any bubbles or cracks. @Drakemi1 also questioned a faint gear whine heard during the driving video. The seller responded to these inquiries, admitting to some minor imperfections and stating that the car operates diligently despite the faint noise.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its unique features and stunning aesthetics. @Rguy called it a 'helluva raffle prize', while @BENTJAG described it as 'absolutely stunning!' @BudHorse praised it as 'maybe the best spec Z I've seen yet', underscoring the vehicle's impressive specifications and design. @Johnnyvett also noted that it was the best-looking execution of a C8 he had ever seen, even suggesting potential improvements to the interior. The general consensus among these positive comments indicates that the vehicle is perceived as special and visually striking.
Neutral: Several comments reflected a mix of curiosity and dissection of specific details regarding the vehicle. @rogermuhle, the seller, provided context about the unique features of this 'one of one' Z06, emphasizing its significance in celebrating the National Corvette Museum's anniversary. @JHBBII humorously critiqued the 'One-of-One' claims that have become cliché among Corvette enthusiasts, actively acknowledging his own participation in the trend. Others, like @evoshift, inquired about the origins of certain design elements, such as the '30 year' sticker, indicating an interest in the car's background without passing judgment on its desirability.
Negative: On the downside, some comments expressed skepticism or concern about certain aspects of the vehicle. @evoshift questioned the legitimacy of the '30 year' sticker, demanding clarity about its factory origins. Another comment from @F92S63M8 suggested the removal of the anniversary sticker, indicating it detracts from the overall appeal. Additionally, @JHBBII's humorous critique of the 'One-of-One' label as a cliché suggests a degree of disillusionment with the marketing narrative surrounding unique Corvette models. Overall, while many appreciate the car’s design, there are hints of doubt regarding its uniqueness and the marketing claims.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its overall appearance and condition. @mef0629 describes it as a 'very nice Roadster,' while @Mstrmnd148 notes that the car looked glossy and appealing in person. Additionally, @RABush appreciates the cleanliness of the car, emphasizing that while individual tastes may vary regarding modifications, the vehicle remains impressive. Many users, such as @jtcrawf55 and @tonythesc400guy, support the aesthetics and mention unique aspects, like the interesting backdrop for the photographs, which adds to the car's charm.
Neutral: Several comments indicate curiosity about the vehicle's ownership and condition. @brian6277 points out that the car's low mileage of 1,000 in five years raises questions about its use. @gumby74 queries about potential alignment issues for the steering wheel, suggesting that it might need adjustments. @lhunt wonders if maintenance items and replacement parts for such vehicles are still available, reflecting a pragmatic approach to purchasing a classic car. @StevenAJ (The Seller) engages with these inquiries, showing responsiveness to potential buyers.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters have raised concerns regarding the vehicle's modifications and condition. @pcchuck agrees with @mef0629, arguing that the extensive black finish might detract from the car's overall appeal and hints at the costs involved in reverting it back to chrome. @mcorrallo also cautions that turning the black parts back to chrome could be both difficult and expensive, suggesting that a future owner must be comfortable with these adjustments. Furthermore, there are questions about potential inconsistencies with aftermarket parts, as noted by @MikeDatsunR16, which may indicate that the car has not maintained concourse quality despite its appealing presentation.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments about this vehicle highlight its appealing attributes and engaging driving experience. @onlyhonda4me expresses admiration for the distinctive 'Root Beer Metallic' color, stating it perfectly suits the S/C Elements. @lemondzurich mentions it being a must-have due to its V-TEC 5-speed transmission, suggesting that the driving dynamics are part of its charm. Additionally, @AlohaZ3 points out how the manual transmission transforms the driving experience into something much more enjoyable. @DatsunZGuy shares a positive personal experience with the Element SC, emphasizing its practicality and fun factor, even with an automatic transmission. The seller, @The_Dude_Abides, also acknowledges the vehicle's fun nature and its ability to accommodate practical needs, like fitting a 65'' TV in the back.
Neutral: Many comments express curiosity about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @pappentl asks for photos of the rear trailing arm mounts, while @MrKD inquires about whether the original clutch has been replaced. The seller, @The_Dude_Abides, provides transparency regarding the vehicle's condition, discussing the completion of various maintenance tasks since his acquisition, including the motor mounts and rear sway bar bushings. He also notes the presence of surface corrosion on some undercarriage components and encourages prospective buyers to review the comprehensive gallery of photos and videos to make an informed decision.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns and minor critiques about the vehicle. @MrRenrut makes an observation about a driving behavior seen in the video, suggesting a different driving approach. Another user, @Cbrf3, initially questions part of the vehicle's specifications but later retracts their inquiry after receiving clarification from the seller. Additionally, there is a playful critique from @HeavyTank77 about the vehicle's branding, wishing it had a more interesting name related to root beer. Overall, these comments indicate that while the vehicle is generally well-received, there are some questions and uncertainties about its specifics.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @89lincolntc highlights the car's fabulous appearance, likening it to a sub 20k mileage vehicle despite showing over 50k on the odometer. The combination of eye-catching colors and understated elegance is praised, encapsulating what one hopes to see in a Bentley. @chbaxter1 also expresses enthusiasm, stating that the 1999 Green Label is the best British car ever built with German engineering, commending its agility, speed, and efficiency. The general sentiment reflects admiration for the classic design and performance potential of the vehicle.
Neutral: @cshai (The Seller) provides clarity on various questions regarding the vehicle's features, confirming that all functionalities such as the antenna, trunk release, and air conditioning are operational and utilizing R134 refrigerant. Different commenters, including @jumpin-joe and @OKA, inquire about the specifics of these features, indicating a general interest in their condition. Additionally, @x308fan raises concerns about the reported issues with the right rear strut solenoid, seeking details that @cshai addresses, explaining that intermittent suspension lights may not significantly impact driving.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance and potential issues are voiced, particularly by @JBFla, who mentions that many service facilities lack the proper equipment necessary for complete servicing. This point suggests that owning the Arnage could necessitate specialized care that may not be readily available, potentially complicating maintenance or repairs. Similarly, @safulop questions the reliability of the reported intermittent suspension faults, recalling similar experiences with other vehicles, casting doubt on the overall maintenance state and repair needs of the car.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments on the C10 Stepside highlight its beautiful blue exterior, with @boaboyoz noting its sweetness and lovely build. Enthusiasts like @EricKnadler19 express nostalgia, reminiscing about a similar truck from their childhood. The enthusiasm for the truck continues as @zpardee appreciates the modern touches while maintaining a classic feel, calling it gorgeous and a pleasure to drive. Overall, many commenters share a fascination with the truck's aesthetics and performance, acknowledging the hard work that went into its construction.
Neutral: There are questions regarding the vehicle's functionality and specifications, particularly concerning its carbureted engine setup. Commenters like @JLsKA510 and @ProfGriff question the decision behind using a carbed Vortec engine despite the extensive modifications made to the truck. Additionally, @Icpms01 raises concerns about the title discrepancy and its potential impact on insurance and registration, which the seller @HeritageGruppe addressed, clarifying that a VIN verification can rectify the issue without complications for the new owner.
Negative: Some critiques focus on the perceived impracticalities of the truck's engine setup. @Icpms01 questioned why the seller did not address the VIN issue before the auction, expressing skepticism about the implications for out-of-state buyers. @ProfGriff pointed out the seeming lack of logic in investing in modifications only to retain a carburetor instead of opting for modern fuel injection. These concerns indicate that not all viewers are convinced of the vehicle's practicality despite its aesthetics and build quality.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's overall condition, with @Zach_stanley96 noting that it is "cleaaaaannnn." @vamax mentioned that it is a clean option for those looking for an imperfect low-mileage LS430, highlighting both the clean presentation and the appealing stereo design. Additionally, @thaisch enthusiastically stated that the car is all one could ever need, labeling it very classy in black, and multiple users acknowledged the transparency of the seller, particularly appreciating the disclosures about the vehicle's imperfections.
Neutral: Comments from the seller, @Collectibleclassics, emphasized transparency regarding the car's maintenance history and current condition. They noted that regular oil changes had been performed, and the vehicle includes low mileage and a solid drive performance. The seller also acknowledged minor imperfections and emphasized their commitment to detailing these flaws upfront to set honest expectations for potential buyers. They encouraged bidders to inspect or inquire further, pointing out that the vehicle allows for enjoyable driving despite its minor blemishes.
Negative: However, some commenters raised concerns about potential sales tactics employed during the auction. @joeedi55 and @YankeeDixie questioned the timing of the seller's comments in relation to a similar auction, suggesting that it felt manipulative to inflate the price of the current listing. Others pointed out visible paint imperfections and wear, with @AZ-Collections remarking that while it was overall a nice car, it suffered from paint issues that would need addressing. Furthermore, @adjwoolley sought clarification on the operational functionality of certain features, including the power folding mirror, indicating that there may be reliability concerns regarding certain components.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @dj_walls2424 mentioned that the vehicle's color is amazing and praised the hardtop, while @GirlRepellent expressed admiration for both the looks and sound of the car, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @V8_LVR described the car as gorgeous and noted its menacing sound, appreciating the performance aspects. @Overextended emphasized that it offers great fun for the price, highlighting Superformance as the only replica that avoids the common aesthetic flaws that give away its reproduction status, whereas @Carguyohio simply stated it is a very nice Cobra.
Neutral: @azclassics (The Seller) welcomed bidders to the auction and provided insights about the car's history and features, acknowledging his limitations due to lack of documentation. @Superformance_Owner_Assn contributed information about the engine's performance background, pointing out certain modifications made by previous owners, and answering questions about the car's specifications. The Seller also engaged with various inquiries about the vehicle, including offers to show the car in person and confirming that it still functions well mechanically except for a radio tuner issue.
Negative: @Cdn043 raised a concern about the wheels being safety wired in the wrong direction, indicating a potential safety issue that needs addressing. Additionally, @59twincam questioned the locking gas cap's existence, while @jdh61 inquired about an unknown button attached to the shifter, highlighting some uncertainty about the car's features. Moreover, @lloyddon1 and @S2K2Z2 were involved in a bidding exchange, demonstrating the competitive nature of the auction but also introducing an air of tension among potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments highlight the vehicle's appealing features, particularly its luxurious finish described as 'triple black.' @mattdren expressed admiration for the setup and specifically mentioned the wheels as a standout element. The seller, @desertmonkey, underscored that the vehicle is well-maintained, having undergone regular servicing at the Land Rover dealership, which reassures potential buyers about its condition. Additionally, the seller emphasized that all necessary preventive maintenance has been completed in the last few thousand miles, making it a very attractive option for buyers looking for a dependable vehicle.
Neutral: @PalmLA89 inquired about close-up photos of the scratches on the door panels, indicating that there are some visible imperfections. The seller promptly provided images of the scratches, confirming their presence and providing transparency about the vehicle's condition. @EstorilPraia asked about potential damage on the front bumper, which the seller clarified was merely glare, reassuring potential buyers about the overall integrity of the vehicle's body. The seller's willingness to schedule viewings also creates an open channel for interested buyers to engage further with the sale process.
Negative: Despite the positive features, some concerns remain. The seller noted wear on the paint protection film (PPF) on the front end, which could indicate that the vehicle has seen some road use that may concern buyers. Additionally, the explanation regarding the reason for selling—switching to a different platform for off-road modifications—might raise questions among potential buyers about the vehicle's suitability for their intended use or whether the seller was satisfied with its performance. These aspects could lead to hesitancy in pursuing the purchase for some buyers who may worry about the vehicle's condition or the seller's motivations.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's condition and aesthetic appeal. @ET-Power called it 'very fun' and 'in gorgeous condition', indicating excitement for the upcoming auction, while @papapit19 praised it as a 'beautiful well preserved and taken care of example'. There is a general consensus among commenters about the vehicle's quality, with many expressing admiration for its appearance.
Neutral: The seller, @TammyB, responds positively to inquiries about the vehicle, highlighting the newness of the tires and providing information about missing accessories, like the convertible top boot. While the absence of the boot may be seen as a drawback, @TammyB maintains a friendly and informative tone, ensuring potential buyers have the necessary details about the car's features and condition.
Negative: There are not many negative comments about the vehicle, though there is a hint of nostalgia and concern about the vehicle's historical context in @papapit19's remark about their previous car not surviving harsh weather conditions. Additionally, @BOWSERBOY1950's inquiry about the convertible top boot suggests a potential concern for completeness in the vehicle's accessories, which could influence a potential buyer's perception.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have expressed their admiration for the vehicle, particularly praising its aesthetic features and unique details. @sdmjake highlighted the terrific livery, while @e9er mentioned the appealing attributes like headlight wipers and the gorgeous buffalo interior. @Mstrmnd148 noted the outstanding condition of the paint and body upon inspection, describing both as remarkable and the interior as looking nearly new. Additionally, @Sfvintage emphasized the exceptional cleanliness of the M635 model, and @SlowNRusty echoed sentiments about the lovely condition of the leather, appreciating the preservation of such a classic material.
Neutral: There are questions and requests for additional information from various buyers that highlight a desire for transparency regarding the car's condition and history. Commenters like @meporsche and @AnyOldIron requested details about the vehicle's gadgets and functionalities, indicating an interest in ensuring that everything is in working order. The seller, @StevenAJ, has responded to requests and expressed intent to provide additional videos and maintenance records, which suggests an effort to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the vehicle for potential buyers.
Negative: Conversely, some commenters expressed concerns about the lack of specific information regarding emissions testing and maintenance records, with @motroman noting perceived silence from the seller in response to these queries. There were also apprehensions about the car's past emissions test failure in 1998, leading to questions about its current status. @JBS27 remarked on the inadequacy of the exterior photos for gauging paint imperfections, suggesting that improved images could better inform potential bidders. Such concerns indicate some buyers may feel cautious without more comprehensive documentation and clearer visuals.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the beauty and design of the Alfa Romeo 1900C, with @boaboyoz and @GDogg calling it breathtaking and spectacular, respectively. @sammyeurocar also echoed this sentiment by labeling it as beautiful, while others like @1973RD350 referred to it as a "gorgeous work of art" celebrating its Italian design. Commenters enjoyed the charm of the car, with multiple references made to iconic figures, like Gina Lollobrigida, to illustrate its allure. The car's artistry was highlighted, with @56PackardMan noting that it exemplifies Italian craftsmanship with no single design flaw. Overall, the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle left a lasting impression on the auction participants, creating a sense of excitement and nostalgia.
Neutral: Some discussions focused on the car's mechanical and functional aspects. @billyblyth brought attention to potential electrical issues, particularly with the brake and reverse lights, sparking a constructive dialogue about their functionality. @Raffi (The Seller) addressed these issues by confirming that the brake lights had been repaired and explaining the reverse light system in response to questions. Commenters such as @Chas_H provided insights into the technical aspects, while others reflected on their own experiences with similar vintage vehicles, showing a community engaged not just in sales, but in a shared passion for automotive history. Comments highlighted the understanding that older cars could have differing configurations, reflecting ongoing curiosity and community collaboration.
Negative: However, concerns were raised about certain features of the vehicle that did not meet expectations. @vrover_356 pointed out safety issues regarding the placement of the brake and fuel lines, suggesting a need for improvements. Additionally, @superleggera13 clarified that the tail lights were not original to the model, pointing to a possible discrepancy in the car's historical authenticity. @msolli1 and other users also questioned the functionality of the brake and reverse lights before the seller's clarifications. Overall, while the car's visual appeal was widely celebrated, some users expressed reservations regarding functional elements and originality, underscoring the complexities involved in trust and authenticity with classic vehicles.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is highly praised for its stunning appearance and thoughtful specifications, highlighted by @GDogg who notes its "spectacular" build in Night Blue over Cognac and Espresso. @GLWTA,onehussler emphasizes the impressive features like the PCCBs and striking color combination, praising the meticulous care it has received throughout its history. The seller, @356rick, has made it clear that the car is a one-owner vehicle with comprehensive service records, making it a desirable choice. Many commenters, including @teamchinman and @brownan, appreciate its classy build and perfect specs, adding to its appeal as an ultimate driving machine.
Neutral: The discussion includes various inquiries and clarifications about the vehicle's features and maintenance history. @LTIII and @jrbike21 engage in discussions about the car's previous incidents and the performance of its components, while @Porsh1975 raises questions about the interior detailing and seat comfort. The seller, @356rick, responds to comments regarding the functionalities of the car, such as the availability of heated seats and the type of brake calipers, providing transparency and insight which adds depth to the conversation without diminishing the car's allure.
Negative: Some comments bring attention to concerns regarding the vehicle's features, including @Porsh1975 who wonders about the interior's detailing and the limitations of the seat options, implying that more could have been done. @yc911kid echoes this sentiment by citing the 14-way seats as a deal breaker for many, suggesting a preference for different options that might suit a wider array of buyers. There are also inquiries about potential dings and rock chips from @aljogav, indicating a desire for transparency in the vehicle's condition, although @356rick assures that the photos accurately reflect its state.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Mordecai remarked that the truck is nice, while @HBTFD called it 'beaut'. @PSFarm finds it a nice truck, describing it as understated and very cool, and @Shootnride echoed this sentiment, calling it a pretty truck despite noting that the color changes with ambient lighting. @boaboyoz expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it a beautiful bad a$ 'bama Chevy pickup and praising the awesome build. @letthegypsyhaveit simply stated, 'Best darn p/u ever made.' @scottyb03 (The Seller) shared enthusiasm about the truck, stating it was well-received in shows and has a significant history.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about the modifications made to the truck and its history, particularly the vehicle's ownership by Jesse James. @ad8n wanted to know if the modifications were made during Jesse's ownership or prior, while @mike_rockwell described the truck as a nice driver but mentioned concerns regarding its front end appearance. @Joe-K and @gots2jump both asked for information regarding the build and photos of the pedal assemblies. @schiller1 offered a practical comment about the vehicle's paint imperfections while still acknowledging it as a sharp-looking truck. @JDarby noted their curiosity about the auction outcome given the truck's celebrity connection.
Negative: Concerns about the truck's appearance and modifications were raised by some commenters. @rlhug1954 inquired if there were more pictures of the front aired up, implying that the current images may not be reflective of its everyday use. @ckwaveski voiced a similar concern about the truck's drivability in its current stance. @markneely suggested that the front end needed height adjustability, comparing it to a 'stink bug,' and highlighting potential issues. @panhead54 pointed out that there was uncertainty about whether Jesse James had built the truck or just owned it, hinting at the lack of clear provenance for potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the overall appeal and performance of the vehicle, particularly praising its build quality and driving experience. @parshooter expresses excitement about the car's 300 hp, mentioning that even his less powerful car was fun to drive. @desicar and @Secondluckiest compliment the tasteful modifications and the clean build of the 510, with @Secondluckiest noting the fun experience of driving with such power. @Gary_T1 emphasizes the car's excellent performance compared to high-end Euro sport sedans while expressing affection for the 510 model. @DatsunNut agrees that the vehicle seems like a blast to drive and commends the owner's efforts in building it.
Neutral: Several comments delve into technical aspects and clarifications regarding the vehicle's attributes and features. @jpr questions the sedan designation instead of coupe, while @gumby74 and @carata engage in a conversation about the rarity of the 510’s AC options. @poormtnkid (The Seller) clarifies details about the car's branded title due to previous damage and repairs, providing context for potential buyers. Additionally, the dialogue includes inquiries about the vehicle's performance features and modifications, such as the choice of fuel cell and engine specs, which @poormtnkid explains in detail. @Loungin112 even offers help for aftermarket AC installation, showcasing community engagement around the vehicle's specifics.
Negative: On the downside, some comments raise concerns about the vehicle's history and modifications. @1996mike indicates that the lack of an emergency brake might negatively impact the vehicle's appeal. @Garycf expresses worries about the branded title, seeking specifics about past repairs and how it might affect the vehicle's legal status in other states. The discussion around repairs includes admissions from @poormtnkid about previous subpar work done on the vehicle, mentioning that foam was used to fill the rocker panel, which could raise red flags for potential buyers. Overall, while the modifications are generally praised, the vehicle's history presents potential drawbacks.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters like @UglyFast and @Beautiful car! have expressed their appreciation for the vehicle, noting its visual appeal and performance potential. @castlecombemotorsports mentioned the low mileage and the incredible sound of the engine when revved high, while @KenCat complimented the car's fantastic looks. The bright yellow paint is seen as a standout feature, with @JB455 highlighting its visibility on the road. @M.Rhee praised the driving video location, adding to the overall positive sentiment around the car's aesthetics and driving experience.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around inquiries about the car's registration and construction details. @fwakeman, the seller, clarified that the vehicle was built by Autocourse in 2002 and is registered as a homemade vehicle in New York. Some users, like @vovchandr and @ukchris, exchanged information about registration challenges specific to their states, discussing the nuances of registering specialty vehicles like this one. @Gatheringstorm60 raised questions regarding potential issues with fiberglass cracks, with other commenters providing insights into maintenance and how to ensure the car passes inspections.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters, such as @Gatheringstorm60 and @2002rick, raised concerns about the complexity of the vehicle's registration process and potential inspection challenges, especially in relation to emissions testing in different states. @Gatheringstorm60 inquired about cracks in the fiberglass, questioning whether they signified deeper issues. @2002rick warned that if the car isn't titled correctly, it may only be usable as a trailer car in certain states, which adds an element of uncertainty for potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's aesthetics and performance, with @Caymanorcarrera noting that it cosmetically looks 'pretty awesome.' @letthegypsyhaveit expresses a preference for this classic over a new Porsche, while @RecoveringAtty praises a specific picture of the car. @JHBBII calls it 'Drop Dead Gorgeous' and contributes a clever suggestion for a vanity plate. Additionally, @Capthorod1 mentions that classic Porsches possess style that surpasses modern offerings, while @PabloMusi emphasizes the aggressive and classy look of the 930 Turbo, showcasing admiration for the car's design.
Neutral: Comments from @DirtyBlonde_Motorsports, the seller, provide context about the vehicle's maintenance and authenticity. They mention the car was ceramic coated, and all maintenance receipts will accompany the vehicle, enhancing buyer confidence. They clarify the differences in titling between model and registration years, noting this Porsche RoW car can have a different title year from its production year. Overall, these remarks offer practical insights into the car’s history without strong emotional bias.
Negative: The sole negative comment comes from @FLBuyer, who inquires about potential issues with the vehicle's paint, asking if there is any peeling or bubbling. This indicates a concern about the car's cosmetic integrity, suggesting that while there is much praise, buyers may still have apprehensive questions regarding the vehicle's condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Poolhouse (The Seller) shares their enthusiasm about the 2014 Roush SVT Raptor, highlighting its powerful performance, fantastic sound, and excellent condition, stating that it's well-maintained with no accidents and only one previous owner. The truck is described as a head-turner, visually appealing in person as it is in photos. The seller is responsive, offering to answer questions promptly, which adds to a positive customer experience.
Neutral: @Ptheery inquires about the towing capacity and horsepower figures for the vehicle, which @Poolhouse (The Seller) responds to, confirming that the Raptor has a maximum towing capacity of 8,000 pounds and shares that Roush's enhancements increased horsepower and torque significantly. Other commenters, like @divino and @benjim34, ask about the vehicle's original shocks, wheels, sunroof functionality, and rust status, to which @Poolhouse provides thorough answers, reassuring potential buyers about the truck's condition and features.
Negative: Comments from @Jeep_Aaron raise concerns about the maintenance history under the current ownership, specifically a two-year gap between services. This prompts @Poolhouse (The Seller) to detail the extensive maintenance performed since purchasing the truck, but it highlights a potential issue for buyers concerned about the vehicle's upkeep. There were also inquiries about the keyless entry code, which @Poolhouse initially notes as a missing feature, but later resolves by finding the factory code, indicating some confusion about the vehicle's documentation.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @rockyoneal expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle's color and envisions it making a trip to Florida, hinting at his fondness for the car. @PetrolInVeins agrees, calling it a "jewel" and praising its beauty. @GDogg reflects on personal experience with a similar model, highlighting it as one of the great cars they've owned. Additionally, @JK-L78 admires the car's aesthetics, reiterating their fondness for the favorite color. @jbowders provides constructive feedback to the seller, suggesting that cleaning the engine compartment could significantly improve the car's marketability, implying a belief in the vehicle's potential.
Neutral: Discussion among users reveals a curiosity about the car's performance and maintenance history. @Uby67vw1958 inquires about basic maintenance, pointing out that the last recorded service was in 2020 and raising doubts regarding the condition of the tires. The Seller (@572056tb) states they drove the car a limited amount, indicating minimal use. @Frank1951 asks about the current smog certificate, while @LincolnRob notes the lack of maintenance over the past five years, prompting further inquiry into the car's upkeep.
Negative: However, there are concerns raised about potential issues with the vehicle. @posetong questions a rattling sound in the engine, suspecting it might indicate problems with the lifters. @LincolnRob expresses disbelief regarding the lack of basic maintenance, suggesting a concerning neglect by the seller. Overall, while the car receives compliments and interest, there are valid worries about its maintenance history and current condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @zswish comments on the vehicle's color, describing the yellow as perfect, while @positraction compliments the impressive dyno sheet and expresses interest in monitoring the auction. @Dsparks74 appreciates the great driving video provided by the seller, and @CJIIIFS expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle's features such as the heads-up display, indicating a potential desire to bid if they were closer. @MartyKC praises the good looks of the vehicle and finds the technical details provided by the seller helpful in addressing likely questions.
Neutral: @ADucommun asks about the mileage since the engine rebuild, showing interest in the vehicle's condition. @Drisler inquires about the stereo features, particularly Bluetooth and a backup camera display. @jspadafore seeks clarification on aspects such as the removable yellow door grips and potential modification options for the steering wheel and sound system, indicating a desire to know more about personalizing the vehicle. @kronix, a newbie to the auction process, asks about the significance of 'removed components' in the listing, showcasing a learning attitude.
Negative: There are some concerns raised regarding the sound system, as @jspadafore notes no sound from the speakers and speculates whether it's due to blown speakers or a connectivity issue with the aftermarket amp, highlighting uncertainty about the audio quality. The seller had to clarify that the original stereo is included, yet the subwoofer is not functioning, which could deter some potential buyers due to the complications with the sound setup. Overall, while enthusiastic comments exist, there are elements of concern that could affect bidding interest.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The overall sentiment towards the boat is very favorable, with multiple users praising its quality and performance. @39mercman expresses admiration for the boat, calling it magnificent and expressing a desire to own it. @ElkManMi shares a long-standing love for Donzi boats, highlighting their quality and impressive speed. @stugottz also shows excitement for the boat and appreciates the 'throttle up' video, suggesting that it's worthy of Carroll Shelby's approval. @TheOMDude adds that the listing's presence of images and videos gives it an advantage compared to another boat auction, indicating that the craft is worth its price.
Neutral: Comments include inquiries for clarification about the boat's condition and specifications. @Dfort-1 (The Seller) addresses questions regarding the boat's care and previous ownership, revealing it had low usage and was well-maintained. The Seller also responds to questions about the boat's hours and use in different water types, stating it was used primarily in fresh and brackish water. There are also comments concerning the speedometer, with @Leosuggs asking for confirmation on any malfunctioning components, while @WeKneeDragger provides insight on how GPS speedometers work, contributing valuable information for prospective buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding potential issues with the boat. @Leosuggs expressed doubt about the working condition of the speedometer and asked if other components were malfunctioning. @Ranchero65 questioned the use of the Shelby name on the boat, wondering about its connection to Carroll Shelby or Shelby American. There is uncertainty regarding the speedometer's functionality, with @Dfort-1 (The Seller) admitting lack of experience with that specific GPS speedometer model and uncertainty about whether it works. Overall, while positively received, some buyers have reservations about specific details that require further investigation.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Calli74 praised the vehicle's impressive specifications, expressing excitement about its features. @bskerda, while commenting on the seller's quality choices, mentioned that the car's spec ended their years of lurking and asked detailed questions regarding its maintenance and history. @rich2k5viper shared their personal love for the car after three weeks of ownership, reinforcing its desirability. @StanGB noted the wagon's enhanced dimensions, highlighting the balance between high performance and practicality.
Neutral: @SWVintage (The Seller) provided answers to @bskerda's inquiries, confirming inspection and servicing at Scottsdale European. The seller addressed concerns about the license plate support and mentioned the presence of two keys, clarifying that there are no transferable warranties. Additionally, @SWVintage explained that the vehicle was purchased from a wholesaler in Texas, which was clarified to @bskerda, who sought specific details about its acquisition.
Negative: @ElroyV reacted to @Carthusiast's comment about dreams being crushed, hinting that the vehicle's allure might come with disappointment for some. @threebirch highlighted a concern regarding two bent front wheels according to documentation, questioning if that issue had been resolved. @bskerda asked about any additional problems during the seller's ownership, indicating a level of scrutiny around the car's current condition.
50k-Mile 2005 BMW M3 Coupe Competition Package 6-Speed Conversion
WBSBL93425PN62668
Lot 189299
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, praising its overall appeal and specifications. @LSLees noted the "really nice spec," while @Boston993 referred to it as a "gorgeous car". @ramman434, despite not being in the market, described the car as beautiful and expressed temptation to view it. @sharkmar chimed in to say it was a "beautiful M3" and highlighted how the yellow calipers complemented the Interlagos Blue paint. @RobE36 echoed positive sentiments saying it has a "great Spec!" and @madman_5117 remarked that the vehicle is "coming out hot." The seller, @hauserkeith, was actively engaging with individuals showing interest, indicating openness to questions about the vehicle.
Neutral: There were various inquiries and discussions regarding the vehicle's manual conversion and its implications. @ritgerd asked about the presence of any paint protection film (PPF) and the condition of the front end. In response, @hauserkeith confirmed there was no PPF but mentioned minor rock chips. Questions about the manual conversion process were also raised, with @EMAXX curious about how much an SMG converted car fetches compared to an original manual. The seller provided information about the conversion work done by Tagit Automotive, addressing comments from users like @quinnp8703 and others discussing the manual swap's motivations and technical aspects. @milesearly5, the current owner, elaborated on the car's pristine maintenance history and the reasons for limited driving since the conversion.
Negative: Some concerns about the vehicle's maintenance and features were raised. @thisismiller, for example, asked for details regarding the status of critical components like the rear subframe, VANOS system, and rod bearings, highlighting a need for more transparency around the car's maintenance history. @Hydralisk89 expressed caution regarding vehicle conversions based on advice from a mechanic friend, suggesting there might be worries about potential issues stemming from the manual swap. Additionally, there was some discussion around the functioning of the PDC system, with @RobE36 noting it does not function anymore post-swap, while @scmorgan and others insisted it could still work if coded correctly. @sharkmar further addressed misconceptions about rod bearings, arguing that the S54 engine should not show wear at such low mileage but mentioning that maintenance measures would still be prudent.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their appreciation for the unique mods and character of the vehicle. @mudcar highlighted the nostalgia associated with the car, suggesting that the 6500 rpm tach redline indicates its original powerful build. @Oldchevytruckguy reminisced about seeing similar Corvettes during the '60s and '70s, sharing a fondness for the unique modifications the car has undergone. Likewise, @Chefgordiemac deemed it a quintessential hot rod from the mid-60s, reinforcing the idea that while it may not appeal to purists, it's an enjoyable ride. @Gmmuscleusa also confirmed that the presence of a lien is not uncommon for vehicles of this age, indicating a level of normalcy in its history that some potential buyers found reassuring.
Neutral: A number of comments focused on various aspects of the vehicle's condition and modifications. @pnilsson68 (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the state-assigned VIN, explaining that it stems from the car being stolen in its past, yet it has a clean title now. Further technical questions about the car's performance were raised by users such as @Chefgordiemac regarding working systems, while others, like @KantDrive554U asked about the operational status of specific components like the heater and horn. Some users expressed curiosity about the car's history and its current state, seeking clarification and more details, which were duly addressed by the seller.
Negative: Despite the positive and neutral comments, there were concerns raised regarding the vehicle's history and condition. @WillieCarGuy questioned the implications of the car's theft recovery title and expressed skepticism about the auction process, questioning how funds would be handled given the lien. This skepticism was echoed by other users like @Farmfit, who sought more information regarding the lien amount. Additionally, @JosCherry noted potential discrepancies concerning the engine, suggesting it may not match the expected specifications, and @Jaxautodeals asked about the car's ability to idle properly. Such concerns highlight some hesitation toward the vehicle's reliability and title status among prospective buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @39mercman describes the vehicle as a 'really cool old Thumper,' praising the durability of Matchless and AJS motorcycles that inspired its longevity. @66Malibu expresses a desire to ride the Matchless without the sidecar, indicating a positive sentiment towards its design. @ReverMotors, the seller, notes the extensive work done to ensure the bike performs well, highlighting the craftsmanship and artistry of British engineering. @ET-Power also calls it a 'beast' and expresses excitement, reinforcing the positive emotions around the bike.
Neutral: @Cdp61 shares an observation that the sidecar is valued in the current bid, suggesting that it is in better condition than many others seen, needing only a repaint. @Motorcyclenut73 mentions that the motorcycle and sidecar look cool together, presenting a general appreciation for their aesthetic appeal without delving deeper into specific attributes.
Negative: @austinhealer humorously challenges the idea of finding a British bike that doesn't leak, hinting at potential reliability issues common with such vehicles. This comment suggests a wariness among enthusiasts regarding the upkeep of vintage models. In addressing the mechanical heritage, @ReverMotors also subtly acknowledges that the bike has its limitations, indicating that while it is well-made, there may be practical drawbacks to owning an older motorcycle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters appreciated the vehicle's potential as a project car. @Jimmy_P noted that it's a great starting point for someone looking to build a race car, highlighting the need for commitment and resources to get it operational. @NateB shared a positive experience from purchasing another vehicle from the seller, emphasizing their transparency and willingness to address buyer concerns, which lends credibility to the current auction. @ShamrockRally also mentioned that the car is more fully assembled compared to others they've seen, indicating that it may require less work to get it roadworthy than other vehicles in similar situations.
Neutral: The seller, @driveaclassicnotaplastic, has been open about the title situation, explaining that the vehicle will be sold with a Bill of Sale due to complications with title transfer. They invited prospective buyers to inspect the vehicle in person, lending a sense of transparency to the sale process. Multiple commenters expressed curiosity about the title's status, with @HALDOC and @E30nus raising questions about potential legal issues arising from the lack of a clean title, while @Mpowa suggested contacting the previous owner for resolution. Overall, the discussion reflects an interest in the car's history and the seller's communication style.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's title issues, with @E30nus stating that buyers might face challenges if the title dispute remains unresolved. They urged caution, explaining how title issues could lead to a buyer not being able to legally own the car. @Sernorman added that perceptions of auction sites have changed over the years, with many sellers not held to strict standards, leading to distrust among buyers. Additionally, the lack of a clear title might deter bidders and cause hesitation, exemplifying an underlying fear of potential legal ramifications associated with the purchase.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @dhsnook shares a fantastic experience with a similar vehicle, noting its longevity and reliability, having driven it well over 400K miles. @Sjulier agrees, calling it an unbelievable highway grand touring car that's easy to maintain. @Aaron describes another example of the same vehicle as a smooth, efficient, and reliable highway mile muncher, expressing interest in purchasing another one, and appreciates the Nautical Blue color of this listing. @GDogg praises the car's appearance, commenting on the great color combination, while @ReelTherapy reflects positively on their parents' experience with the car, categorizing it as great.
Neutral: Several commenters seek clarification on the vehicle's features and condition. @C43EZRider questions the purpose of the diesel fender vents, while @kzcan affirms this is the right Benz. @Cireisa asks about the stereo functionality, sagging headliner, and some inconsistencies in the listing information, prompting @Sjulier to agree there are notable discrepancies. @MinibikeMadman (The Seller) provides responses to these inquiries, including confirmation that the stereo works and relevant pictures. The dialogue indicates a general interest but also a need for clarity.
Negative: @bkc raises a concern regarding the passenger airbag claim, expressing skepticism about the glovebox presentation. @nikitino25 inquires about the transmission fluid maintenance and questions the seller's motives for selling. @Cireisa expresses worry about rust underneath the vehicle, describing it as below average compared to other examples, while @Sjulier emphasizes that the AC appears to not be functioning as expected. Furthermore, Cireisa's mention of low mileage coupled with visible rust creates a deterrent for bidding, indicating some potential buyers are skeptical of the vehicle's overall condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Rodeo_King praised the spectacular photos of the vehicle, suggesting it's ready for an enjoyable drive along the Pacific Coast Highway. @GDogg remarked that the combination of Grand Prix over Linen with a Black Soft Top is excellent, showcasing the car's visual appeal. @letthegypsyhaveit expressed enthusiasm for the car, stating they would prefer it over a new Porsche any day. @theforce88 added to the positivity by describing the car as beautiful and wished the seller good luck with the sale. @Frida highlighted the timeless nature of the 1988 Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet G50, noting it would only require minor work to bring it to its full potential, ultimately calling it a good, honest car.
Neutral: @Malibu_Shar (The Seller) provided a wealth of information about the car's history, mentioning that it has been in the family for 37 years and underwent various repairs and restorations. They addressed questions regarding the vehicle's mileage and clarified that the odometer was not broken, providing an estimated total mileage of around 60k. @SkiddleyDoo acknowledged discrepancies on the CarFax report but was grateful for the made clarifications, noting the logged mileage history seemed odd. Meanwhile, @bforbesut advised the seller to remain patient during the auction process, as high bids typically come closer to the end. @RiskySearch raised questions about the rattling noises during drive videos, demonstrating interest in the vehicle while seeking reassurance.
Negative: @gearheadcharles criticized the habit of sellers listing specific G50 details in headers, which they felt was unnecessary and overly common. Others expressed concern about the vehicle's history, with @SkiddleyDoo questioning the odometer readings and potential misrepresentations in the report. @RiskySearch highlighted that the rattling noises in the video could be a concern, suggesting that it might require further attention. Additionally, @rickforeignx requested documentation for the parts used in the engine rebuild but faced the disappointment of a lack of available receipts before the auction's end.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @toomuchstuff. (The Seller) has presented a very clean and nicely restored 1975 CR 125, garnering positive reactions from multiple users. @PDXBryan shared their love for the motorcycle's aesthetics, highlighting its iconic design and expressing newfound knowledge about the stinger exhaust modification made in '75. @ET-Power commended the Seller for the impressive restoration work, noting its pristine condition, while @Blizzard340 expressed a personal preference for the '75 model over the '74, recognizing its appeal and AHRMA sportsman legality. Overall, comments reflect admiration for the motorcycle's quality and historical significance.
Neutral: The Seller, @toomuchstuff, provided detailed insights into the restoration of the bike, including specific parts used and their OEM authenticity. The discussion pointed out the correct factory components, such as the '75 downpipe and the injection molded side plates. The Seller's effort in maintaining original features, like the unique matt anodized finish on the rims and the provision of touch-up paint in original colors, contributed to the informative nature of the comments, without prevailing opinions about the bike's value.
Negative: While the comments were mostly positive, there were slight technical corrections from users such as @ShredderRob, who clarified about the exhaust type, indicating there is still some confusion regarding the bike’s specifications. Although these corrections did not detract significantly from the overall appreciation of the motorcycle, they illustrate the passion and scrutiny of the community regarding accuracy in details related to classic bikes.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @HEman expressed enthusiasm for the Allante, noting his appreciation as a former owner and complimenting the unique "Camaro" vibe due to the hood stripe, emphasizing that it gives the vehicle an awesome look. Additionally, @MCEcars (The Seller) has provided reassurance regarding the functionality of various components like the antenna, top latch, and CD player, which @spiked70 inquired about. This positive engagement reflects a well-maintained car with appealing features.
Neutral: @MCEcars (The Seller) is actively engaging potential buyers by inviting questions and mentioning that the vinyl on the hood can be removed if necessary. This indicates an openness and willingness to accommodate buyer preferences. However, the functionality of the power top was clarified by @CadillacFlashback, who informed @lostinthesixties that Allantes do not come with power tops, only electric latches, which may be an important detail for potential buyers to consider.
Negative: @woogiewoofereia pointed out that the driver's seat appears over-worn considering the vehicle only has 39,000 miles, which raises concerns about the overall condition of the interior. This criticism could deter buyers who expect minimal wear for a relatively low-mileage vehicle. Additionally, @lostinthesixties's inquiry about the power top indicates a potential misunderstanding about the car’s features, which could reflect negatively on its perceived quality.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TNGuy finds the new Subaru engine and transaxle rebuild exciting, noting that everything is in good condition and that someone will enjoy the vehicle. @jammyauto appreciates the custom cabinetry and mentions the benefit of additional headroom without the A/C unit. @mister-riha (The Seller) confirms that the van runs well with the new engine and provides detailed information about average MPG, emphasizing the labor invested into the vehicle and hopes someone will find joy in it.
Neutral: @cruzahome comments on the extensive financial investment made in the van and questions why the owner is selling it despite the upgrades. @Pouletgarcon and @deaddrift seek further details, such as videos of the vehicle running, undercarriage photos, and clarification on the registration status, while @boyerb discusses the aftermarket gauges and their implications on speed accuracy. @mister-riha responds to these inquiries, mentioning the lack of video footage but expresses confidence in the engine's performance and explains the registration lapse.
Negative: @deaddrift raises concerns about the outdated registration and the non-standard steering wheel, while also questioning the accuracy of the speedometer due to potential modifications. @ParaGringo voices skepticism about the overall state of the van, pointing out numerous red flags and suggesting that the owner's responses contribute to wartiness regarding the van's value.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received positive attention from potential buyers, with @Brobertson and @DrPhos expressing interest and asking thoughtful questions about features like the tow hitch and fuel tank size. The seller, @Monarch, has also highlighted the truck's well-maintained condition, noting that significant parts like the brakes, alternator, and battery have been recently replaced. Additionally, the charitable aspect of the sale has resonated positively, as the seller aims to donate 100% of the proceeds to support an orphanage in Ghana and fund water wells, showcasing a commitment to giving back.
Neutral: The comments have included requests for clarifications about the vehicle's specifications, including @DrPhos's inquiry about the height of the roof rack and @Brobertson's question regarding the presence of a tow hitch. @Monarch provided helpful answers, confirming that the roof rack height is 94 inches and that a tow hitch could be added upon request. However, there has been some confusion concerning the fuel tank size and mileage, with @2hecknback and @WAGONBOYTD discussing their opinions on the vehicle's expected performance metrics without definitive consensus.
Negative: Some comments reflect disappointment regarding the seller's initial miscommunication about the vehicle's specifications. @2hecknback corrected @Monarch's fuel tank size and mileage information, indicating that the standard fuel tank should hold around 20 gallons and suggesting better mileage than what was initially stated. @WAGONBOYTD expressed surprise at the seller's lack of familiarity with these specifications, indicating a lack of confidence in the seller's knowledge and suggesting that there might be issues with the truck that have not been addressed.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters are highly enthusiastic about the vehicle, describing it as a beautiful car that offers incredible value in the supercar market. @Pettyfan43 highlights the C8’s impressive performance compared to its cost, calling it the 'best bang for your buck.' @Bartruff1 appreciates its timeless color and class, emphasizing that it is a world-class grand touring car at a reasonable price. @davethewave911 also sees the vehicle as a nice fit for any collection, praising its simple build and a low price point in the realm of supercars.
Neutral: Many commenters show a neutral interest in the vehicle, asking specific questions about its features and history. @mhpearlman inquires about the reason for the sale and acknowledges the car’s clean condition, while @PapaDon1958 asks about the front lift option. @JCoates curious about the presence of magnetic ride shocks, and @jboogie1 requests clarification regarding the vehicle’s ownership history due to discrepancies in reports. @DelSol9400 expresses admiration for the seats over upgraded models, showcasing varied preferences among potential buyers.
Negative: Conversely, some comments raise concerns about the vehicle’s condition. @BillKay601 notes visible scuffs and dirt on the interior despite it being low mileage, indicating potential issues with maintenance. @Caz2018 humorously speculates about the cause of the wear, suggesting it could be from boots getting in and out of the car. @MROZE confirms the absence of the magnetic ride and front lift options, which some buyers might find disappointing, leading to potential reservations about its overall appeal in terms of features.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Mr._H describes the vehicle as "The Gobbler on wheels," indicating a quirky and fun nature. @Pettyfan43 mentions a personal connection to a similar van, highlighting a sense of nostalgia for vintage vehicles. @Noisycow expresses enthusiasm about the joy and fun the van would bring, stating it would eclipse even a high-end model like a $150k Sprinter. @Katmandookie shares a personal longing for the van while also considering how it would make mundane errands like "WalMart Runs" a lot more interesting. Other commenters, such as @83HURST and @ntwrkguy1, celebrate the van's unique style and charm, connecting it to the beloved aesthetics of the 70s.
Neutral: @IngramPeregrine suggests potential upgrades to the engine and interior, indicating a desire for improved performance without dismissing the current state of the vehicle. @TDR inquires about the van's age, questioning if it's a recent build or vintage. @Creece80, the seller, responds to @IngramPeregrine's concerns about the interior, proclaiming it is in pristine condition. @Love4x4 requests more detailed information about the van's history and interior condition, suggesting that potential buyers desire more backstory to appreciate the vehicle fully.
Negative: @Chuckinnj brings up concerns regarding auction sales and hidden reserve prices while noting it's back to the auction stage. @elongo makes a light-hearted jab about the necessity of including an 8-track player, implying that the unique features of the van aren't complete without such nostalgic accessories. @NREMTP1 does a humorous reference to Barney Rubble, which might imply that he sees the van as somewhat outdated. @INOV8 questions the documentation that will be provided to confirm ownership rights, indicating concerns about the selling process and potential legal issues.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @nucleonic expressed enthusiasm about being the first to comment on the vehicle after a waiting period of five days, indicating a sense of eagerness and interest in the vehicle's availability.
Neutral: @MK69 inquired about the horsepower (HP) of the vehicle, showing a need for specific technical details that potential buyers might consider important in evaluating performance.
Negative: @Codified questioned the service history of the vehicle, asking where it was serviced in Sanford. This indicates a potential concern about maintenance and the vehicle's overall condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the bike's aesthetic appeal and performance capabilities. @Sumser called it a beautiful bike, while @TOM, DAAsher noted their love for a similar model. @Cupcardriver praised its superior condition, while @insideline appreciated its rarity as a pinnacle of BMW's Hex head Twins. Overall, the comments reflect a strong appreciation for both the bike's design and its engineering excellence.
Neutral: A few commenters sought additional information about the bike. @Jordanbmxcollector inquired if the bike was all original and whether it had ever been in an accident. @kiwis asked if there was any damage and about the tire dates, indicating a level of interest in the bike's condition. The seller, @jtnorth, addressed these concerns, confirming the bike's originality and condition while also mentioning features such as the paint protection film.
Negative: There are few negative remarks present, with one comment from @ripper996 suggesting an amendment to the year mentioned in one comment. @Neverbuy mentioned that the bike is worth at least $17K, implying that the seller might be aware of the bike's market value but potentially questioning the reasoning behind its pricing. Overall, there is a slight undercurrent of skepticism about the bike's valuation amid the overwhelmingly positive feedback.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is a classic 'barn find' 928 euro spec, with a history of mechanical repairs that have made it road-ready and reliable. The @valleyvintagerestoration mentions extensive receipts for the services performed, indicating that it has been well cared for in terms of maintenance. Buyers appreciate that, despite its imperfections, the car is capable of being a fun daily driver or a solid project for restoration down the line, as highlighted by commentor @Checkmate1996, who notes that the fuel system has been addressed, which is crucial for performance.
Neutral: Several comments express a desire for more detailed photographs of the vehicle, as potential buyers feel that seeing the car from multiple angles would provide better insight into its condition. Commentor @linderpat emphasizes the importance of quality images since most bidders will not have the opportunity to inspect the car in person. @valleyvintagerestoration acknowledges this feedback and plans on providing more images after a detailing session, reflecting a proactive approach to addressing buyer concerns.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the car's condition and its history, such as questions regarding the inoperable fuel gauge and the lack of clarity surrounding a reported accident in 1991. Commentor @vette67 expresses specific inquiries about the car's mechanical systems, asking for confirmations on the functionality of various components, including headlights and the charging system. The seller does their best to clarify these points, noting that, although the fuel gauge is non-functional, all other instrument lights are working as they should, but uncertainty regarding the accident could deter some potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments reveal a strong appreciation for the vehicle's capabilities and value. @hangryharry and @Scott_S highlight the truck's towing capacity and overall performance, emphasizing its factory specifications and power. @maw06 shares an emotional sentiment about the Ford truck legacy, expressing nostalgia and excitement about the current model's features. The seller, @denbeste_motorsports, reinforces this enthusiasm with information about the truck's horsepower and unique features, such as the Shelby package and Whipple tuner inclusion.
Neutral: Several commenters are seeking clarification and additional information about the vehicle. @4warned asks about the specifics of the car's mild damage and comments on the importance of the Carfax report, which @denbeste_motorsports addresses by providing context about the incident that caused the minor damage. Additionally, @Bawston and @superuser request videos to better assess the truck's sound and performance, indicating a desire for more engaging content to complement the listing that @denbeste_motorsports promises to deliver.
Negative: There are minimal negative comments, primarily focusing on minor concerns. @981D4 points out a spelling error in a previous comment from Bring A Trailer, which @denbeste_motorsports acknowledges without further engagement. @Bring_A_Trailer_123 raises a concern about the rising trend towards electric vehicles, implying a sense of urgency for buyers to consider the truck before it becomes obsolete. However, these negative sentiments do not significantly detract from the overall positive reception of the truck.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed strong admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its rarity and exceptional condition. @HondaFreak noted that it is a 'GEM' and indicated anticipation for record sales prices. @Vtec4ever described the car as 'gorgeous' and praised the preservation of its original parts. Commenters like @UKDM and @dcarv707 emphasized the significance of the Mugen parts and predicted that the auction could set records. @codnelso_68 commended the seller, stating he 'couldn’t buy from a better guy' and encouraged bids on this well-preserved example. Overall, there's a shared recognition that this vehicle is not just a car but a significant piece of automotive history, with several commenters expressing pride in its lineage.
Neutral: The commentary included various discussions around the auction dynamics and the history of the Integra Type R. @AlanAUH, for instance, noted the overwhelming amount of attention the auction has received, while @Lomly (the Seller) confirmed he would remain available for inquiries throughout the auction. The timeline of the auction has generated interest, with users such as @Nly2k and @VerbalDiarrhea expressing their surprise at the rapid bidding. @The_Dude_Abides shared nostalgic stories about the car, highlighting its significance in the automotive world, while @Dc2Productions provided context regarding the production numbers and the importance of this specific model. Overall, the conversations reveal a blend of excitement and appreciation for the auction process itself.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism regarding the auction price and the state of the vehicle market. @Rons_Evo questioned the valuation, suggesting he had seen cleaner examples sell for less, while @tk15 expressed surprise at the idea of six-figure prices for such cars, finding it hard to justify. @LamboLover77 was curious about the reasons behind the high pricing and questioned the current market dynamics. Additionally, @Hondaboy164456 and @Nly2k voiced doubts over whether the seller anticipated the auction's rapid progression and high bids, suggesting a disconnect between expectations and reality. Such comments indicated a recognition of the absurd financial stakes surrounding rare automotive collectibles.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments celebrate the overall aesthetic and engineering of the 2023 Porsche GT4RS. @onehussler appreciates the color scheme, stating that it balances modern design with a nod to the classic 997.2 GT3RS. @Fisher has had an exhilarating experience renting the GT4 RS in Europe, highlighting its performance both on the autobahn and winding mountain roads. Commenters like @HelpMeHelpU express strong admiration for the vehicle, calling it "the baddest-ass GT4 RS" they've ever seen, while @Wagen59 labels it the only non-911 Porsche worthy of consideration, emphasizing its spectacular design.
Neutral: Several comments note the significance of the vehicle in the context of its production and market. @MeritPartners (The Seller) introduces the GT4RS to the community, articulating its homage to the 997.2 GT3RS and detailing its MSRP of $258k. Others like @ThinksHesFast and @BlitzLead acknowledge the GT4RS's remarkable status as one of the fastest production cars and commend its amidships engine configuration for superior handling. Additionally, there are inquiries related to the vehicle's options and window sticker, indicating a healthy interest in the car's specifications and history.
Negative: There are also comments expressing disappointment regarding the vehicle's current usage and value. @Theapplez laments that the car has yet to be driven beyond the break-in period, while @Fisher urges that such high-performance vehicles should be experienced rather than left idle. @xlr_8 shares similar sentiments, criticizing the notion of purchasing the car solely as an investment. Overall, there is a concern among enthusiasts that the car's potential is being wasted, as it is perceived to be stored away instead of embraced for its driving capabilities.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed their enthusiasm for the bike, highlighting its impressive features and appeal. @Rpitts71 called it a 'killer bike' and appreciated its setup for trail riding, while @ktm_rick fondly remembered how this bike taught him to go fast. @Jamminjimmy shared his lifelong admiration for the CR 500, noting that he had owned four of them and enjoyed riding in popular locations. Many commenters wished the seller good luck with the sale, reinforcing the bike's desirability.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific features and requested additional videos. @39mercman asked about off-road registration, confirming it is valid until 2027. @manaze69 and others requested cold start videos to see the bike in action, which the seller, @PlayTheRush, has acknowledged and is working on. There were also technical inquiries about parts included with the sale, such as whether stock parts are available and the condition of the frame rails, indicating a desire for more info before potential buyers commit.
Negative: A few comments expressed concerns or shared cautionary tales about the bike. @thereddevil recounted a challenging experience with a previous version of the bike, highlighting the risks involved with riding it. @Coolhand009 raised a critical question about the condition of the bottom frame rails, reflecting concerns over hidden damages. Additionally, @weider1717 remarked that the current bidding price did not reflect the motor's worth, suggesting skepticism about the bike's valuation in the market.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @AlohaZ3 emphasizes the exceptional build quality of the vehicle, referring to it as having "bulletproof mechanicals." @Griswards admires the condition of the vehicle, noting it is "mint" and expresses sadness at the prospect of it leaving the area. Other commentators, such as @obiefox and @American_Jeep, echo similar sentiments, praising the Jeep Rubicon as the best ever made, with @American_Jeep specifically calling it the "pinnacle of Jeep design" and appreciating the unique color.
Neutral: @grantchapman11 (The Seller) provides helpful information to potential buyers, answering @dirtyhermit's inquiry by confirming there is no electronic cruise control, highlighting the mechanical driving experience. He also agrees to upload a picture of the original window sticker. Additionally, @grantchapman11 shares that the Jeep is kept in good working order, with no known issues, and all functions like the A/C and radio operate as intended. @Dral97 mentions the vehicle's rarity in its color, implying interest in it being an exciting and desirable find.
Negative: While there are no explicitly negative comments, @dirtyhermit's inquiries regarding cruise control and the request for pictures of the window sticker suggest a level of caution and scrutiny typical in the vehicle buying process. This indicates that the potential buyer is looking for transparency regarding the vehicle's mechanical status and features. There are no complaints about the vehicle itself, but the requests for further information might imply some potential concerns.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors are overwhelmingly impressed with the vehicle's aesthetics and overall driving experience. @Michael_H. finds the polished cookie cutters highly attractive, while @parshooter admires the vehicle's Mexico Blue color and simple design, suggesting a preference for its style over more modern variants. @GatorDMD appreciates its beauty, and @Jfp58 considers it the best year for a 'Middy', noting it as super clean and well-presented. Many also echo this sentiment, including @996.journey and @mpm97turbo, who emphasize both its visual appeal and the high quality of the restoration work that reflects a true passion for the Porsche brand.
Neutral: There is a mixture of observations related to the vehicle's history and condition. @steven0401 mentions the absence of a CarFax report and expresses a desire for more context on the vehicle's ownership history, acknowledging that it has changed hands several times. @bluechipservices (The Seller) and others respond to inquiries regarding the vehicle's maintenance and modifications, indicating a willingness to provide transparency for potential buyers. The exchange demonstrates an active community effect, with participants like @howS providing additional insights about the vehicle's past and care, establishing a dialogue surrounding its history as an enthusiast's car.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding specific aspects of the vehicle's condition. @TheTorch highlights potential paint bubbling, prompting a response from @bluechipservices (The Seller) who confirms the issue but clarifies that it isn't rust. Additionally, comments from @tferrer and @itrom question the quality of recent mechanical work, specifically related to excessive sealant used on the engine case and chain boxes, which could indicate underlying issues. @porscheman81 expresses skepticism about the motor work and the veracity of the listed modifications, hinting at the complexities of maintaining a hot rod Porsche.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beautiful Inka Orange color and overall condition. @2002dave refers to it as a 'fine example' with great features, especially praising the wheels and sound. @ bbk describes it as 'just a little bit of Inka heaven' and compliments its beauty. @hulk2000 shares a nostalgic story about their family’s history with a similar model, reinforcing the emotional connection many enthusiasts feel towards this car. @groceg and @roberto both emphasize the stunning aesthetic and thoughtful restoration that has been done to maintain originality, praising the car as a great find in the classic market.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in technical discussions about the car's features, options, and modifications. @bimmrdoc, the seller, confirms details about the vehicle's specifications and history, discussing the non-original engine block and providing insights into its restoration. @e9er and others share thoughts on the desirability of features like the sunroof, underlining that opinions vary among enthusiasts. The conversation also touches on minor cosmetic details, such as the upside-down door handles and specifications of the tires, indicating a mix of appreciation and a desire for clarity on the car's condition.
Negative: There are some concerns raised about discrepancies in the car's originality and condition. @knuck39 questions whether the car has its original numbers-matching engine, which @bimmrdoc responds to, mentioning the replacement block. @pd1 brings up the presence of certain modifications that might suggest the vehicle is not entirely original, prompting further discussion about the car's history. Additionally, @labador3color points out alignment issues with the passenger door and potential rust concerns, signaling that diligent buyers are paying attention to details that could affect value.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its appealing long-roof design and overall presentation. @BigCanoe noted affection for the Mercedes long-roofs and showed appreciation for the seller's transparency regarding the vehicle’s VMI. @CAJoel shared his satisfaction after purchasing a similar model, praising the North American V6 engine and encouraging others to bid without hesitation as they would not be disappointed. @1600veloce, the seller, emphasized the car's great condition, rarity, and offered thorough details about the maintenance and service performed before listing.
Neutral: Several users asked for clarifications on various aspects concerning the vehicle's condition, maintenance history, and service records. @Roup1 inquired about the service records and specifically about the completion of the 60k service, while @parke1 asked about the safety features included in the model, indicating interest in understanding the vehicle's capabilities. @BigCanoe also provided a detailed breakdown of service intervals from the VMI report, expressing curiosity over the frequency of plugs and coils replacement and whether this indicated potential issues.
Negative: There were concerns raised about the condition of the vehicle, particularly focusing on the paintwork and potential damage. @87LANDYACHT and others remarked on the small chips and scratches found primarily on the hood, with speculation that it could be attributed to high-speed driving on the autobahn, though there was also a need for clearer explanations from @1600veloce regarding the vehicle’s history. @BigCanoe brought up issues of sun fading on the interior wooden inserts and potential aftermarket replacements, to which the seller remained responsive but acknowledged the need for clarity in these areas.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The seller, @pjbun, describes the vehicle as being in original stock condition, with only a bed cover added after purchase, which may appeal to buyers looking for a well-maintained truck. Additionally, @pjbun assures potential buyers that the repairs were done with Toyota authorized parts, indicating a commitment to quality and reliability after the accident.
Neutral: Several comments indicate prospective buyers seeking further details on the vehicle's modifications and accident history. @rbanuelos questions the reduced load capacity, indicating that it's not something typically noted for trucks, while @corboto asks for clarity on specific modifications. Furthermore, @RDO23 requests information regarding the accident, showing a desire for transparency.
Negative: Some concerns about the vehicle have been raised by commenters such as @TNB8, who inquires about the condition of the wheels and any potential cosmetic issues like dings or scratches. Their question points to a possible apprehension about the vehicle's overall appearance, despite the seller’s claims of its careful maintenance post-repair.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and enthusiasm about the Mini Cooper, highlighting its fun driving experience. @Bobolarkin mentioned considering the car for an adventurous road trip across the country, while @Jdstell praised the balance and enjoyable driving dynamics of a similar model, referring to it as fun on the track. @M3_Driver called it a 'cute little bugger,' showing appreciation for its exterior appeal, and others seemed intrigued by its performance capabilities and potential for track use.
Neutral: Several comments were focused on the car's specifications and modifications. @rbcm2005 (The Seller) provided clarifications about various aspects of the vehicle, including its registration status and features like carbon fiber doors without windows. There's interest in the modifications made by previous owners, including why the interior was partially stripped, leading to questions about its usage history and setups for track events. The seller also shared links to articles related to the car's original build and upgrades, illustrating a commitment to transparency about its background.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the condition and functionality of certain elements of the car. @M3_Driver questioned the logic behind stripping most of the interior while keeping certain features, and @AlfaBottas inquired about the service light, expressing worry about its implications on maintenance. Some commenters, such as @jvallentine, sought information about specific parts and performance metrics, revealing curiosity mixed with apprehension towards its history, particularly regarding the previous racing and usage experiences.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @JonPorsche expressed excitement by calling the vehicle a 'time capsule,' highlighting its pristine condition. @TomT73 and @quattro30 praised the car, suggesting it would be a wonderful purchase for someone due to its low mileage and gorgeous appearance. @georgepehanick and @nowr2go commented positively, noting the beauty and nearly new condition of the 2004 Porsche 911 C4 S, emphasizing the rarity of finding a vehicle with such low miles.
Neutral: @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) provided detailed information about the car, noting its impressive mileage of only 1,800 miles and its history as a home staging tool used by a couple in Florida. He mentioned recent maintenance performed on the vehicle, hinting at its readiness for a new owner while also inviting potential buyers to view the car by appointment in Neptune, NJ. Several commenters, including @Oibguy and @suatg, inquired about the service history and location of the vehicle, showing interest in understanding its maintenance background.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's maintenance history and necessary servicing. @ripper996 estimated that the car might require $5-6K in servicing and suggested the IMS bearing should be replaced. @Bnharton and @rahlers1 echoed these worries, inquiring about service records to reinforce the car's premium price value. Additionally, @Usd97 felt that the automatic transmission was a disappointment, suggesting it could have significantly higher potential if manual.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CRM1969 describes the vehicle as a nice looking Corvette, suggesting an aesthetic appreciation for it. @goggies3 mentioned that the Corvette has been well maintained with an extended bumper-to-bumper warranty and had the torque converter replaced, indicating proactive care. Additionally, @goggies3 states they love the vehicle and highlights that it has had minimal issues since service, expressing a positive sentiment towards its performance and reliability.
Neutral: @CRM1969 inquires about the tire condition and details regarding the torque converter replacement, reflecting an interest in the vehicle's maintenance history. @goggies3 provides clarification that the tires were replaced before their purchase and mentions that the vehicle has been driven approximately 4K miles in three years, reflecting moderate use. The dialogue also includes confirmation from @goggies3 that the extended warranty is transferable, addressing potential buyer concerns without imparting strong bias.
Negative: @CRM1969 notes a concern about the vehicle having seven owners, questioning why it hasn't found a permanent home, which could imply underlying issues or lack of desirability. The discrepancy in the tire tread depth measurements provided by @goggies3, first stating 10/32 and later correcting this to 7/32, presents an inconsistency in information that may raise doubts about the overall transparency regarding the vehicle's condition. Overall, these comments could contribute to apprehension among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's history and reliability.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @heartt44 expresses a fondness for Novas, appreciating their quality. @jgtnor describes the vehicle as a friendly and sporty American cabriolet, hailing from a golden era of Detroit design. @Electraglider recalls nostalgia, mentioning that a car like this could have been purchased for under a grand back in the day. @Dollycat3 and @Reflogic both appreciate the car's simplicity and rarity, highlighting its charm and aesthetics. @rmwcali views it as a timeless beauty, perfect for summer enjoyment.
Neutral: @Cperv (The Seller) provides information about the vehicle, noting that while it originally came with a power roof, it currently operates manually due to the absence of the motor. The seller indicates that aside from some non-original gauges and a cassette player, the car is largely original. The gas gauge is mentioned as problematic, and discussions arise concerning the rear quarters, addressing rust issues and prior patchwork. @Highlander63 and @chrismatte raise practical questions about the car's features and condition, seeking detailed aspects about wheels, potential rust, and related repairs.
Negative: @junkman feels that the term "sporting" is generous for the car's performance capability, while @Highlander63 expresses concern about rust issues, particularly in the rear quarters, and mentions that the Chevy II line was prone to these problems. @Sulley007 requests more information about the missing parts for the power roof system, implying inadequacy in the current configuration. Overall, some comments reflect skepticism regarding the car's operational quality and the extent of rust repairs needed.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle's overall condition and driving experience. @jpea, an owner of a similar model, expressed admiration for the car's excellent seat condition and fun driving dynamics. @Fredrickson (The Seller) reassured potential buyers about the car's mechanical reliability, noting it has been softly driven and was recently maintained, with no current issues. He emphasized the fun of driving the car and the impressive torque figures, aligning with @ALEQUY's appreciation for the car's driving characteristics.
Neutral: Several inquiries about the vehicle's history and condition were made by potential buyers. @nwong11 requested information about service records and any concerns regarding leaks, to which @Fredrickson (The Seller) responded by sharing that there were no leaks and that the car has been well-maintained. @joeb3875 questioned the low mileage accumulated over two years, and @Fredrickson explained that they had been traveling often and the car was mainly used for short drives. @DaveDe raised concerns about known issues with the rear differentials, highlighting the need for repairs or reinforcement, and @Fredrickson addressed this concern by mentioning that they had not encountered any problems due to the gentle driving style.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's long-term reliability and maintenance were pointed out by some commenters. @HCNAPPA wanted to see pictures of potential trunk weld issues and asked about mechanical problems. Additionally, @DaveDe shared apprehensions regarding the rear differential mounts and their common failure, prompting him to question if repairs had been made. @Fredrickson acknowledged these concerns while asserting that no issues had been experienced, but some buyers remained cautious about the car's age and potential hidden problems.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the BMW Z8, with many enthusiasts highlighting its elegance, performance, and timeless design. @TommyBruin praised it as an elegant car that 'just happens to go like hell,' while @GDogg described it as a 'spectacular Z8' that has a lot to love. @securebid992 noted its timeless appeal, and @sliktrak emphasized its beauty and unique lines, expressing interest in potentially purchasing this distinguished model. Several commenters, including @Shadowboxster and @Knuckles-R-Busted, reiterated its classic status, indicating that no matter how many Z8s appear on the market, they continue to click and admire each one, showcasing the vehicle's lasting impact and desirability.
Neutral: Comments from the seller @idealclassiccars provided logistical details about the auction and the car's condition. They assured bidders that a running and driving video was forthcoming and expressed enthusiasm in helping the Z8 find a new owner. Additionally, they addressed inquiries regarding the vehicle's features, confirming the absence of some accessories like the convertible top cover and providing information about the tires and navigation system functionality. @mmusa55 and others discussed the historical context of the 2003 model, clarifying points about its production and features, such as the sport package, contributing to a helpful exchange of vehicle knowledge within the discussion.
Negative: There were some critical remarks regarding the Z8, particularly related to its market valuation and component functionality. @mmusa55 raised a concern regarding the model year and feature discrepancies, while @M_Blitz expressed skepticism about the car's market potential, predicting it would only reach $200K due to its color combination. Moreover, issues were noted regarding the non-functioning CD player and the navigation system, with @idealclassiccars providing updates on these problems but confirming that repairs were being made. @porsche1986 reflective comments on past pricing suggest disappointment over the vehicle's depreciation, adding a layer of caution for potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle's beautiful and unusual blue paint combined with the blue interior, with @Mongoose55 expressing excitement over its spectacular color combo and low miles from only one owner. @Bugulup (The Seller) welcomed the community's interest and highlighted their appreciation for the color, encouraging further discussions. Moreover, clarity on the driving situation was provided, with @DBV requesting maintenance records and @Fabio1106 inquiring about delivery options to California, which @Bugulup affirmed they could accommodate.
Neutral: Commenters discussed the vehicle's features and conditions with a sense of curiosity but without strong opinions. @FXRcR1 and @chdavis exchanged information about the reliability of the HSE seat heating elements, while @nucleus sought specific part numbers related to heating elements. @Phoffmann asked about leather options and maintenance records, inquiring about potential issues with the headliner, which @Bugulup assured they would address. Overall, the conversation remained informative and engaging among the participants.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @Rabidhorse reported suspicions about the windshield being cracked and the detail on whether the wheels were serviced, while @Phoffmann expressed worries about potential rust forming near the tailgate and the possible need for a new headliner. @Montlebahn's inquiry about the air conditioning leak indicated a concern that needed clarification, with @Bugulup addressing these queries. Overall, the comments reflected a mix of enthusiasm and skepticism about the vehicle's current state.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight the impressive performance and luxury of the vehicle, with @FXRcR1 noting the remarkable capability of the M275 engine that allows for effortless cruising at high speeds. @GLWA,MonsterJoe adds that after proper maintenance, the car is reliable and practical, even achieving 20 mpg on the highway while delivering a smooth and powerful driving experience. @mrichen (The Seller) expresses deep attachment to the car, describing it as a strong representation of the luxurious V12 S-Classes, reflecting careful attention to maintenance and enhancements that maximize comfort and performance.
Neutral: There is a sense of community in the comments, with @MonteCutlass expressing eagerness to learn about the vehicle after acquiring it. @mrichen (The Seller) invites potential buyers to engage with him directly for any inquiries, emphasizing transparency and the opportunity for prospective owners to reach out for more information or photos. This interaction suggests a supportive environment for discussions about the car.
Negative: Some underlying concerns are hinted at with @mrichen (The Seller) addressing a minor incident that resulted in a negative mark on the CarFax report. He describes this incident as a minor rear-end bump that did not cause significant damage, but acknowledges that such tables in the CarFax might deter some buyers. This situation is further compounded by the need for ongoing maintenance that potential owners must consider, which @FXRcR1 touches upon by noting maintenance can be expensive.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @watergate528 described the vehicle as a "sharp truck," highlighting its overall visual appeal. @CRUSH noted its "crazy low mileage" and referred to it as a beauty, expressing enthusiasm about its condition. @SerottaD emphasized the truck's garage-kept status and praised the quality of the paint, suggesting that Ohio's climate has preserved its condition better than other regions. Additionally, @shelbyglhs appreciated the functionality of the gas tank and spacious interior design, recalling positive experiences from owning a similar vehicle.
Neutral: A few comments provided informative details or clarified aspects of the vehicle, such as @BigRedTed who shared a personal experience with a similar truck, noting the interior color discrepancy with the listing. @loudonmotorsford (The Seller) clarified questions about the vehicle's features, such as confirming the 8-foot bed and explaining the meaning behind the SLT acronym. Other inquiries from users like @Lubedude1 included questions about the air conditioning and cruise control, indicating interest in the practical functionalities of the truck.
Negative: On the other hand, there were concerns raised, especially regarding potential discrepancies in the vehicle's mileage. @Bjcourtney asked about the actual mileage and pointed out inconsistencies in the CarFax report, which raised red flags about the truck's history. @BigRedTed pointed out that there was a difference in the interior color description, which could lead to buyer confusion. These comments suggest that while the vehicle is appealing, some uncertainties could potentially deter interested buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters praised the 1968 Morris Mini Cooper S for its unique features and solid care over the years. @Automark complimented its maintenance by Heritage, while @Mayjer appreciated the unique Australian protection plates. Others such as @AliceAustin expressed admiration for the car's beauty and rarity. @MrDOHC, the seller, highlighted the vehicle's stunning condition, saying it has no rust and has been garage-kept, which impressed community members.
Neutral: Some comments focused on the specifics regarding the car's modifications and discrepancies in its identity as an original Cooper S. @Mayjer and @Guam135i raised questions about the car's build specifications compared to factory options. @1071S and @winabbey noted that some details might suggest the car doesn't hold its original specifications, leading to confusion on its authenticity. @DB6 also mentioned that modifications could impact how prospective buyers view its originality.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car's authenticity, with several commenters indicating it might not be a genuine matching numbers Australian MK1 Cooper S. @winabbey warned that the body and ID plate could belong to different vehicles, while @DB6 pointed out potential discrepancies in factory options. @MrDOHC acknowledged the challenges in confirming the car's history, and @britbits remarked on the difficulty in establishing what constitutes an original Mini, further complicating the car's perceived value and authenticity.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle's condition and aesthetic appeal. @Profcarnut noted that the car is very nicely kept, stating that areas typically showing signs of age were remarkably clean, making minor flaws almost undetectable. @LamboGhost17 also admired the car's care and maintenance, indicating that it is a lovely vehicle. Additionally, @ksaman described it as beautiful, showing a general admiration amongst viewers.
Neutral: The discussions included requests for more detailed information and clarifications about the car. @PNinSF asked specific questions about the driving video and paint meter readings, emphasizing the need for transparency regarding any potential oil leaks. @m3m and @LamboGhost17 further requested more useful driving videos and additional information about bodywork, with @LamboGhost17 inquiring specifically about the condition of the tub area.
Negative: Concerns arose regarding the car's paint condition and ownership history. @PNinSF highlighted the potential implications of the paint meter readings which suggested the presence of body filler, leading to further questioning about the vehicle's history of bodywork. Additionally, @rmurphy1990 pointed out a common cosmetic flaw found in many 964s, signaling potential hidden issues, while @Profcarnut mentioned that factory paint thickness could vary, which might raise doubt in discerning the vehicle's full condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments praised the vehicle for its aesthetic appeal and nostalgic value. @bigboysurf reminisced about the powerful reputation of similar classic cars, noting the wicked designs of the Javelin and its racing heritage. Others like @mr_smee and @sourdough highlighted elements like the car's livery, wheels, and potential for speed, reflecting enthusiastic support from those who appreciate its classic styling and performance potential. @David_P expressed a strong desire to rally the car, indicating its thrilling potential to drive.
Neutral: Several comments focused on specific inquiries and observations about the vehicle. @WesDuenkel requested more detailed images showcasing the car's condition before painting and its underbody, while @SunCityMike asked about the status of the air conditioning components. @socalcougar noted the absence of a third pedal, suggesting modifications that might not align with traditional setups. @Gunnteach provided context about the car's history, emphasizing that it had been previously owned and had surfaced at a show, which adds a layer of narrative to the vehicle's background.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about the car's condition and performance. @bikerfox pointed out smoke coming from the exhaust, raising questions about whether it was a warm-up issue or something more serious. @GT750 requested better pictures of the floorboards, highlighting what appeared to be modifications made to accommodate mufflers, suggesting potential structural issues. Additionally, comments like those from @Morris4408 questioned regulatory compliance regarding the removal of side marker lights, indicating possible legal complications.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Collectibleclassics, the seller, presents a welcoming and professional tone regarding the 2003 BMW Z4 Roadster 3.0i BAT Auction. They emphasize their commitment to transparency and customer satisfaction, showcasing high Google Reviews ratings and encouraging potential buyers to reach out for more detailed information or to view the car in person. The team appears motivated, with a solid track record in the collectible automobile market, which adds credibility to the auction.
Neutral: @JMFangio raises a valid question regarding the accuracy of the vehicle's photos, noting discrepancies between previous auction images and the current gallery. The seller responds by explaining the color correction process and the limitations of photo quality due to different lighting conditions and camera technologies. This exchange highlights the seller's openness to address inquiries and ensures potential buyers are well-informed about the visual representation of the car.
Negative: Concerns arise from @JMFangio about the apparent differences in the car’s color across various photos, suggesting a lack of trust in the image authenticity. The initial inquiry about heated seats from @KMBCars indicates a potential uncertainty regarding the car's features, which may deter some buyers who prioritize thorough specifications. This discomfort with the visual representation and feature clarity could affect prospective buyers' confidence in proceeding with the auction.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle's quality and elegance, highlighting its extreme safety features and comfort. @royclausen emphasized its quietness and comfort, describing it as the most comfortable car imaginable. @Urbanista noted the fantastic blue leather and service history, expressing enthusiasm for the car's overall condition and eagerly anticipating a drive video. Additionally, @JTAppraisals remarked on the beautiful white and navy color combination, which added to the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: Commenters expressed varying degrees of interest and inquiries surrounding the vehicle's condition. @M555 complimented the interior's comfort while also questioning the yellow tint of the headlights in the images, to which @Alwakeel (The Seller) clarified that the fog lights were responsible for the coloration. @JWag9 communicated their intent to view the car, contributing to a back-and-forth discussion with the seller about email confirmations.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding potential issues with the vehicle's wiring and HVAC system. @Rapchat inquired about any HVAC problems, but @Alwakeel (The Seller) reassured that there were no issues. However, @Carolinacarguy pointed out that many vehicles from 1992-1996, including this model, were known to experience wiring harness failures due to the biodegradable sheathing used during that era, casting a shadow on the vehicle's reliability.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @gmagno expresses strong enthusiasm for the vehicle, referring to it as an "AWESOME CAR!" He shares his familiarity with early models, highlighting that he has owned several including a 2011 and 2012 model and currently drives a 2018 XJR575. He emphasizes the importance of preventative maintenance and knowledge about common issues. @DaveyP123 appreciates the vehicle's aesthetics, specifically complimenting the "perfect color combo." @padesha (The Seller) also describes the car as beautiful, reinforcing its appeal.
Neutral: @padesha (The Seller) engages with potential buyers by mentioning he will provide additional undercarriage photos and details about recent maintenance, specifically noting that the cooling fan has been replaced and there are no coolant leaks. He further shares multiple images of the car's undercarriage, differential, and axles to assure potential buyers of the vehicle's condition and maintenance status.
Negative: @padesha (The Seller) acknowledges some imperfections in the car's exterior, pointing out dings on both the driver's front and rear doors that were touched up by the previous owner, although they remain unfurnished. @CarmanUSA2025 comments on the vehicle's depreciation and the broader market for Jaguars, indicating confusion over why the cars have historically lost value, despite their appeal. This suggests a larger concern regarding the model's market performance.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @classic57al opened the bidding with gratitude from @tim54575, the seller, who also acknowledged other bidders like @bagwellk and @Joiner3. Commenters praised the vehicle's beauty, with @Winnerdog and @Fez expressing excitement about its condition and potential. @porkpiehat shared fondness for MG cars and emphasized the importance of experiencing one, while @Triumphtrsix admired the car as a living artwork and highlighted the appealing banjo steering wheel.
Neutral: Several comments raised technical concerns regarding the car’s functionality. @Winnerdog inquired about a shudder felt when engaging first gear, raising questions about the clutch or transmission. @tintinmilou noted that the oil pressure seemed low, commenting on the slight oil pressure reading during a test drive but also reassured that the vehicle is drivable. @Lannis provided personal experience with oil pressure in similar models, suggesting that the lower readings are not a concern, aligning with @tim54575's commentary on the oil pressure being acceptable for driving.
Negative: @Miatadon pointed out an engine temperature issue, questioning if the thermostat was absent or if the gauge might be faulty, which can impact oil pressure readings. @TRFW raised concerns about potential rust issues seen in the photos, asking about the overall rust condition of the vehicle. @tintinmilou also mentioned that while clutch chatter is common, it could indicate a necessary replacement in the future, highlighting underlying issues that might need addressing.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its character and performance. @Hella-Buggin noted that the Porsche 997 GT3 is an incredible machine, sharing their experience of a hassle-free 700-mile drive. @JSNY complimented the vehicle's specifications and sincerely wished the seller good luck with the auction. There was also positive feedback regarding the addition of the Persian rug in the driver's compartment, with multiple users finding humor and charm in it, such as @WillTradeKidneyfor911 and @gumby74, who mentioned how the rug ties the space together.
Neutral: Many comments included inquiries about the vehicle's condition, history, and specifics like whether it had paint protection film (PPF) and the age of the tires. @gpc789 asked if the car had PPF, while @abbazioc inquired about the tire date codes, indicating that potential buyers are analyzing every detail. The seller, @docbonz, responded to these questions promptly, reassuring users about the car's maintenance history and acknowledging requests for additional photos. Some commenters pointed out the need for service updates and the importance of a DME report, illustrating that prospective buyers are keen on ensuring the car’s reliability, especially considering its performance potential.
Negative: Not all feedback was glowing; several users raised concerns about the vehicle's condition and the seller's presentation. @cheungms and @Aeneas137 pointed out a worn shifter and questioned the presence of warning lights in the dashboard, emphasizing the need for clarity regarding maintenance. @daman410 and @prlinn suggested that the vehicle needs new tires and cleaning, hinting that the vehicle could benefit from better presentation to enhance its auction appeal. Additionally, @simsimma lamented that bidders might be put off by the lack of professional images, which adversely affects the selling price of such a high-value car.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its outstanding quality and desirability. @Dean_Laumbach emphasizes the car's exceptional color, Black Opal (Code 189), describing it as one of the most beautiful hues ever used by Mercedes-Benz, showcasing its pearlescent nature that changes under different light conditions. Enthusiasts such as @gscharnagl and @MikeinHboro express their enthusiasm, noting how the R129 checks all the boxes for a convertible and remarking on the car's gem-like qualities. Other commenters, including @calisomb and @jagbit, praise the car's pristine condition, the rarity of the color, and the high-quality detailing provided by Dean, reinforcing the belief that anyone who wins this vehicle will be extremely satisfied.
Neutral: The comments also present a balanced perspective on the vehicle's history and current condition, with @67benzboy raising a question about potential flood damage, which @Dean_Laumbach promptly addresses by assuring that the vehicle shows no evidence of past water intrusion. Some users, like @donc4 and @JKG2828, ask specific questions regarding minor cosmetic issues, such as sagging fabric and memories seat function, indicating that while the car is praised, there are still details that some bidders are curious about. @bringingatrailer notes an unusual bidding situation that briefly affected the auction but confirms an extension to clarify any misunderstandings, which reflects an awareness of the auction process and buyer concerns.
Negative: Though the overall sentiment is positive, a few comments hint at skepticism about the auction process and potential issues with the vehicle. @aleccartio highlights confusion over a bid cancellation and the valuation of the car, suggesting it should be worth significantly more than indicated in the auction. Additionally, @lytlejackson's excitement about the combination of features is contrasted by the concerns expressed by some about the potential risks involved in bidding, as reflected in the comment about deteriorated plastics mentioned by @CICBarkeep. These concerns show that while many see the value in this R129, there is an underlying caution among potential buyers about the investment in a classic vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The seller, @DEAUTOSINC, confirmed that the vehicle has undergone necessary maintenance, specifically the replacement of the turbocharger oil lines, ensuring that both turbochargers are functioning well. This assurance of proper functionality and the vehicle's flawless performance has been positively received by potential buyers. Additionally, the seller provided clear information about the factory-installed options, highlighting that the front monitor can play DVDs, which adds to the vehicle's entertainment capabilities.
Neutral: Inquiries from potential buyers, like @casualobserver and @Volflnc11, focused on specific aspects of the vehicle's features and history. They sought clarification on the status of the turbocharger work and whether the entertainment system was original or aftermarket. The seller addressed these inquiries promptly, confirming the clean title status and providing details on the entertainment system's capabilities, contributing to a transparent communication atmosphere.
Negative: @thorson54 raised a concern regarding whether the car has a salvage title, which could indicate potential past issues with the vehicle. While the seller clarified that the vehicle holds a clean title, such inquiries reflect the caution potential buyers may have regarding the vehicle's history. This concern underscores the importance of title status for buyers when considering their purchase.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @SkyHazeGreen commented that the vehicle has an interesting stripe pattern, calling it a cool car. @LongDucDong described it as beautiful and indicated that it should attract a good price, while @Guilianna25 praised the color scheme and expressed excitement about its value. @6speedy was particularly enthusiastic about the seats, wishing to have them in his own vehicle, describing the car as gorgeous. @Worldclassmotorcars (The Seller) provided reassurance about the car’s condition, noting it is dealer-owned and has never been individually owned before, highlighting the completeness of the sale.
Neutral: @Chris_Harp inquired about the window sticker and options but did not express a strong opinion on the vehicle. @ThrasherBear asked whether the accents on the car are removable, indicating curiosity rather than definite praise or criticism. @DavilB suggested that the car’s unique styling creates a 'showroom gift wrap delivery vibe,' hinting at a mix of admiration and amusement. @Oldhockyplayr admired the paint and interior choices, but voiced concern about the extra cost for the graphics, emphasizing that preferences vary among buyers.
Negative: @LongDucDong thought the stripes and accents did not work well together, which implied a critique of the aesthetics despite its beauty. @prof_x found the headlamps reminiscent of a Miata and deemed the black interior too plain for an Aston Martin. @petcar3388's remark about the colors being 'pure ghetto' reflects a strong negative perception of the color choices. @Kovar noted he would love the car but lamented that it's four times his budget for a convertible, suggesting it may be priced beyond reach for some interested buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters are enthusiastic about the vehicle, with sentiments reflecting a fondness for older models. @39mercman expresses nostalgia, stating he loves these old vehicles but notes limitations for highway travel. @KoBear1 and @MW4CarMan both appreciate the vehicle's charm and potential, with the latter calling it a fun, historically significant project. @JohnCanziani (The Seller) mentions the vehicle drives comfortably and does not leak, adding to its appeal for potential buyers. He also highlights its ability to grab attention, implying it could be a great addition to a collection.
Neutral: Several comments touch on technical aspects and inquiries related to the vehicle's specifications. @Danny53 asks whether the Ford logo is stamped anywhere, and @TXJeepfan examines casting numbers to identify potential originality in the components. Questions about the overall length and feasibility of transport are raised by @krystociak, showing concern for practicality. @JohnCanziani (The Seller) provides detailed information regarding the VIN and engine, indicating the thoroughness expected in such transactions.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the vehicle's authenticity and adaptability. @jneuenburg questions the legitimacy of the engine and frame number, suggesting it may not be a genuine Ford GPW, casting doubt on its historical value. Additionally, @Joe_in_NH mentions worries regarding shipping limitations due to included parts. While there are comments addressing the condition of the vehicle to reassure buyers, such as @D518's inquiry about rust repairs being answered with none present, the overarching skepticism about authenticity remains a potential hurdle for recommendations.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @pt70 commented that the vehicle is super clean, indicating a strong first impression of its condition. @snekee7 described the truck as good looking and expressed satisfaction with the installation of new tires. Additionally, @ColinCyyz shared a positive experience relating to the rubberized flooring, saying it's convenient for a truck and easy to clean, further affirming the vehicle's care and upkeep.
Neutral: @HIGHSIERRA57 pointed out that the truck has 15" wheels instead of the 16" mentioned in the listing, but this correction was acknowledged by the seller. @revelatorphoenix inquired about the existence of a 7-pin bumper plug for trailer hauling, which was confirmed by the seller. Other commenters shared varying opinions on the rubberized flooring, with some familiar with similar flooring reassuring @snekee7 that the appearance is normal.
Negative: @VerbalDiarrhea raised concerns regarding marks on the painted surface and questioned the condition of the dashboard, asking for additional photos. @snekee7 expressed apprehension about the wrinkles in the rubber flooring and asked about the date codes of the new tires, highlighting a potential element of uncertainty among potential buyers. Furthermore, @revelatorphoenix pointed out a discrepancy involving the odometer reading, which the seller had to clarify.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors noted that the car appears visually appealing, with @jefreeto calling it a "beautiful car" and others like @moonbeam996GT3 and @Purosangue referring to it as a "nice-looking replica." The overall aesthetic has been complemented, particularly mentioning the wheels and tires, which were appreciated for their condition and design. Additionally, @mini1966 stated it presents as a colorful bucket of fun, indicating a favorable perception of its utility as an enjoyable vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification about the car's specifications, including the tire size and the year of the donor VW Beetle chassis, with @Hulk2000 and @GLWA,MONACOV66 asking questions for additional information. Furthermore, there was discussion that the car likely has a lower engine displacement than advertised, as suggested by @moonbeam996GT3 and @broodie, who expressed curiosity about achieving the stated 1814 cc. The seller, @RPExotics, responded by confirming that the car was built by a professional builder and provided details like the chassis year and feedback on engine specifications.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the authenticity of the builder's claim, with @daniel550 and @VMotorcars strongly asserting that this car was not built by Vintage Motorcars of California as stated by the seller. The comments emphasized that the vehicle appears to be a home-built kit rather than a professional build, undermining its perceived value and quality. Additionally, @daniel550 criticized the quality of the build compared to Vintage Motorcars' standards, while @bjamison0002 and @Tom78737 expressed skepticism about the vehicle's alignment, further contributing to the negative perceptions surrounding the craftsmanship.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @jwzg expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle's color combination, noting that his wife loved the Corvette at a car show. Additionally, @NismoXIV eagerly anticipates a video highlighting the exhaust, showing a strong appreciation for Borla systems. @KeithRichards also praises the car, mentioning its rarity and history while reminiscing about his own previous Corvette.
Neutral: @GirlDream requests more angle pictures of the car with the top down, indicating a desire to see the vehicle in different views. @Carbuff3 shows genuine interest in seeing the car in person, while @Bluntarrow, the Seller, acknowledges this request by agreeing to take photos with the top off. @Jocko315 is curious about the possibility of seeing a walk-around and driving videos, showing interest in further details ahead.
Negative: @Bartruff1 critiques the vehicle by stating that while the C5 is a great value in high performance, it lacks the remarkable manual transmission, which he finds disappointing. This comment suggests a missed opportunity for a more engaging driving experience. Overall, there's a slight undercurrent of dissatisfaction mainly regarding the transmission option in an otherwise well-regarded car.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @HelloImAdam appreciates the vehicle, mentioning it's a nice car he'd bid on if he weren't located across the country. @LongDucDong shares their positive experience with a similar model, noting it as the best car they've ever owned and highlighting the potential for enhancements like better suspension and a short throw shifter for an improved driving experience. @sidud expresses admiration for the car's longevity, commenting on its great appearance even after 20+ years, while @Wiscoboiz hears that it's a good option for learning manual driving, which @dannychastain (The Seller) confirms, stating it is easy and fun to drive.
Neutral: @GotClutch commends the vehicle's Honda/Acura manual transmission and i-VTEC engine, wishing the seller luck with the sale (GLWTA). @Tampanews provides a moderate viewpoint by addressing @LongDucDong's comment about the manual transmission's feel, stating they don't recall similar feedback about the shifting quality, suggesting some differing opinions on that aspect.
Negative: @mercedes_123 raises concerns regarding the SRS light, asking for an explanation, and notes potential wear on the seat material, prompting a request for clarification. @NVGT350 responds to the wear question by calling attention to the description where it was clearly mentioned. Additionally, @Wiscoboiz seeks more information about the status of the car's transmission fluid and the clutch replacement, indicating some uncertainty regarding its maintenance history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and the care the seller has taken as evidenced by the comments from @cwkamin96 and @JT77, who mention the low miles and the overall appeal of the bike. @JMHarley06 (The Seller) responds positively, confirming he purchased the bike new and has kept it as a 'garage queen,' further emphasizing the bike’s pristine condition and low usage due to his age and collection of motorcycles. Other compliments include its great sound and maintenance, showcasing admiration for both the vehicle and its current owner, which is echoed by @01996tt, who believes it to be an absolute jewel.
Neutral: Some discussions about the bike revolve around its features and specifications, with users like @zedbyers noting it already has a 6-speed transmission, and discussing potential upgrades that could modernize the bike's capabilities. @Rumbling raises questions about the cam chain tensioner issue and the introduction of the Electronic Throttle Control (ETC) system in 2007 models, while @Jazzfishzen provides clarifications regarding the throttle system, mentioning that the ETC was not introduced until the 2008 model year. Overall, contributors seek to understand the bike's functionality and any issues that may arise, leading to informative exchanges about the specifics of the Harley Street Glide.
Negative: Some comments touch on concerns regarding the bike's mechanical history. @Boomer54 inquires specifically about the cam chain tensioner issue, indicating it could be a point of concern, even though @JMHarley06 (The Seller) assures that the 2007 model does not experience these issues. Additionally, @Rumbling mentions potential problems related to the ETC system, highlighting a perceived risk that some early models faced with electronic glitches. However, @JMHarley06 counters these worries by stating there have been no issues and that the bike runs great, ultimately downplaying any negative perceptions.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle, highlighting its unique specifications and modifications. @Besim referred to the car as a "unicorn," emphasizing its rarity and special features. @Just1more echoed this sentiment by praising the vehicle as possibly the best spec E82 ever listed. The modifications, particularly the limited-slip differential (LSD) mentioned by @d001 and @jjandlj, were noted as enhancements that improve acceleration. The overall build quality and tasteful additions were celebrated, with @Xiao_Niao noting that this car exemplifies the best of modern BMW. Additionally, @Hlsilver and @wem5310 commented on their excitement for the next owner, suggesting that the car is a joy to drive.
Neutral: Several comments showed a balanced perspective, raising questions about the vehicle's condition and modifiability. @Rallybill inquired about paint and underbody condition and suggested additional photos for clarity, which @iwantagx (The Seller) addressed by sharing details about the car's garage-kept history and care during winter months. @dcmccall expressed interest in the car as a potential daily driver, asking about the impact of the modifications on daily drivability, and @Yeezers had specific questions about potential leaks. The engagement from potential buyers illustrates a cautious yet hopeful interest in the vehicle's performance and maintenance history.
Negative: Some commenters highlighted concerns regarding the vehicle's modifications and potential issues. @Yeezers brought up existing leaks and noise issues related to the camber plate, reflecting on the potential for ongoing maintenance. @jjandlj pointed out concerns about the car's fuel economy due to the LSD from an automatic model and the potential popping sounds from camber plates. @outrunner wavered on emissions compliance in California, questioning whether the intake modifications would pass smog checks, while @ecniv noted that the vehicle sounded noisy in driving videos. Lastly, @DaveyJones sought clarification on the emissions implications and whether a tune change would be necessary, pointing out the complexities associated with such modifications.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz finds the Toyota LiteAce Bucket Truck amazing and cool, suggesting that it opens up numerous possibilities for potential users. @David_P describes it as the cutest little bucket truck he has ever seen, while @Mrcreative1 expresses excitement about the endless possibilities offered by the truck's boom operation. Several users, including @Cali240z and @Mongoose55, share playful ideas on how to justify the purchase to their spouses, appreciating its utility for tasks like hanging Christmas lights.
Neutral: @TokyoMotorsDC (The Seller) provides detailed information regarding the specifications of the truck, responding to inquiries about max weight capacity, boom height, and dimensions when the bucket is stowed. The seller notes that while the truck weighs 2260kg and the bucket can reach 24 feet when fully extended, further measurements regarding retracted height are forthcoming. @Haulgas raises concerns about state regulations for licensing while @MDRB235 questions the choice of wheel size, leading to an informative exchange regarding vehicle specifications and legality in different states.
Negative: @KoBear1 expresses hesitation about wanting the truck after considering the bucket's depth and their height, indicating potential discomfort with the equipment. Additionally, @JackSweny shares past experiences of distrust with outriggers, emphasizing safety concerns. @Haulgas mentions issues with registering similar vehicles in certain states, adding to the apprehension around legalities associated with such unique trucks, which could deter potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @pennzo notes that the motorcycle is beautiful, expressing interest in its recent service and tire condition. @BillyBandit is intrigued by the low mileage of the bike, emphasizing a wish to hear the story behind it. Other commenters also appreciate the bike's aesthetics, with @zedbyers acknowledging the need for some TLC for its outdated items but still describing it as a "nice looking bike." Furthermore, @MrMike2 shares a positive experience with carbureted models, stating that they are easier for knowing and willing owners to maintain.
Neutral: @Saabaru, the seller, provides clear information regarding the bike's specifications and history, including buying it due to its low mileage. @Saabaru also mentions that the bike has been kept in climate-controlled storage since purchase. Additionally, multiple commenters, including @RWN525 and @2wheels4life, confirm the bike's carbureted engine configuration, with @Saabaru elaborating on the models' transition from carburetors to fuel injection in the early 2000s based on the production years.
Negative: @donroger1 raises a concern about the hardbag mounts, specifically asking for photos to understand why one side appears lower than the other. There is also a hint of confusion among commenters regarding the bike's mileage; @cwkamin96, for instance, questions the original tires alongside the low mileage. Lastly, @joker1 expresses a strong preference for carbureted models during these years, indirectly suggesting that they might be better despite the modern trend toward fuel injection.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed high praise for the vehicle's overall aesthetics and features, particularly highlighting the Porsche Entry and Drive system as a standout convenience that significantly enhances the driving experience. @gregoryindiana enthusiastically noted the beauty of the Cayenne, suggesting it might even surpass their own recent purchase from @genevamotorcars. @CottonClark echoed this sentiment, stating the current Cayenne Diesel is 'just drop-dead gorgeous' and expressed satisfaction with their own vehicle sourced from Geneva, demonstrating a strong enthusiasm for the brand and model. Further positive feedback came from @genevamotorcars, the seller, who confirmed the vehicle had been well-maintained by its previous owner, adding to its allure for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the vehicle's warranty details and service history, providing a balanced perspective. @essjayarr shared insights about the 'Dieselgate' warranty, indicating it could last until 2028 or up to 120,000 miles, which the seller confirmed. Additionally, @ricofafs and others inquired about specific service records and vehicle conditions, such as the last service performed and the maintenance history, reflecting an interest in understanding the vehicle’s past without leaning towards a positive or negative stance. @genevamotorcars provided some clarifications regarding modifications and confirmations about the vehicle’s in-service date, which seemed largely informative and neutral in tone.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about potential issues with the vehicle. @jamestielsch mentioned that the diesel recall label was not readable, while @poseidon68 speculated about possible paintwork on the driver side quarter panel, indicating potential cosmetic concerns. @ricofafs highlighted the need for headlight replacement due to condensation, revealing a possible maintenance issue that could incur significant costs. Meanwhile, @McFaram brought up the tire pressure monitoring system (TPMS) light, indicating concerns about the vehicle's readiness and condition. These comments reflect caution and scrutiny among potential buyers, focusing on potential risks rather than only the vehicle's features.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments highlight the Yukon as a spacious and smooth driving SUV, suitable for family trips. @Goeaux, who previously owned a similar vehicle, expresses regret for selling it, praising the ample space for passengers. Additionally, @GVInc (The Seller) mentions maintaining the SUV in great condition, ensuring that all maintenance is up to date and that everything works as it should. Overall, the vehicle is described positively for its driving comfort and reliability.
Neutral: The seller, @GVInc, responds to inquiries regarding access to the third-row seats, confirming that it is easy to navigate between seats. Potential buyers like @F1Rocket seek details about the seller's motivation for selling the vehicle and inquire about potential repairs related to previous damage, which @GVInc assures was minor and properly fixed. Other commenters seek clarification on specific features of the vehicle, including the possibility of an AFM system and service records.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the vehicle's fuel efficiency, with @mafinta pointing out that the E85 flex fuel engine is rated ineffectively at 15 MPG combined and 12 MPG with E85. This reflects a broader critique of the SUV's driving cost relative to smaller vehicles. Users also question the seller's reasoning behind selling the vehicle shortly after purchase, with @sslindee and @F1Rocket looking for further explanations that may hint at dissatisfaction with the vehicle's attributes.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @panardrod praised the Thruxton as an excellent machine, reflecting on his experience with a 2003 T-100 Bonneville he improved and thoroughly enjoyed, admitting that he would have chosen a Thruxton if starting over. @trailerjoe appreciates the bike's ease of riding, reliability, and fun factor, emphasizing that while it’s not a superbike, it’s perfect for nicely paced adventures. @motoFiend also confirmed the durability of the engines, sharing his own experience with an '05 Thruxton while expressing excitement about the lasting quality of the bike. Overall, the positive comments highlight the reliability and enjoyable riding experience of the Thruxton along with customization potential.
Neutral: Several commenters interacted to seek clarity on specific bike features, with @Freffer inquiring about the rear seat and being informed by @KentuckyEd that the bike is a single seater. @EdwoodCA noted the factory seat design and potential accessory options for passengers. The discussion further revealed confusion regarding the carburetor system; @bforbesut questioned the original setup, and @UltraMotorSource (The Seller) confirmed the bike is factory correct with carburetors. The commenters also speculated on the exhaust system and its design, indicating varying levels of knowledge and experience with bike modifications.
Negative: @trailerjoe expressed concerns about the aftermarket exhaust system potentially being vulnerable to damage in a tip-over, hinting at a downside for the bike's overall durability. Additionally, there was a mixed understanding regarding the existence of both carbureted and fuel-injected versions of the Thruxton, leading to some confusion and debate among commenters. @brohawk had to correct previous statements regarding the carbureted models, which reflects a lack of consensus and clarity in that area. Overall, while the comments weren’t overwhelmingly negative, there were hints of concern over certain aspects of the bike's design and functionality.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Vtec4ever praised the vehicle's durability, stating it will "never die" and can run on anything, thriving even with neglect and showing no signs of breaking down. @Craven highlighted the clever marketing behind the vehicle's nickname "Hardbody," calling it a highly desirable trait for a truck, which also reflects well on a person. @phonejim referred to it as a "great truck," implying satisfaction with its performance and reliability.
Neutral: @Alex2526 inquired about the maintenance history of the transmission, specifically asking if the fluid and filter had been changed, which indicates a proactive approach to vehicle maintenance. @Elcapitain asked whether the truck could make a long drive back to Alabama and inquired about the tire age, suggesting a consideration of the truck's readiness for extended travel. @ShirtPants sought clarification about signs of bodywork from a previous incident and the condition of the clear coat, showing an interest in potential cosmetic issues.
Negative: @1963FordFalcon raised concerns regarding the timing belt and fuel injectors, questioning the need for multiple replacements in a short time frame, which could indicate reliability issues. @BWARE94 (The Seller) addressed these concerns by explaining that the injector replacement was necessary due to a stuck injector, however, potential skepticism remains regarding the overall maintenance history. Overall, there are lingering uncertainties about the vehicle's past complications, contributing to doubts expressed by the commenters.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @PDXBryan expressed admiration for the bike's classic design, noting it captures the essence of AMA Superbikes, while @mo8ius remarked on the bike's timeless quality. @biggar acknowledged the ZRX as potentially the best-looking Kawasaki, and @racing_unlimited shared his experience of owning the ZRX1200, stating it's his daily rider and he wouldn't consider replacing it. @ItsNautique (The Seller) reiterated the bike's competence and the enjoyment it brings, attracting a lot of positive attention from enthusiasts.
Neutral: @lougeebee inquired about the stock exhaust, leading to @ItsNautique (The Seller) confirming that it will not be included. @thereddevil mentioned not being able to comfortably ride it due to height, while @maj75 shared a personal experience of owning a different version that was one of his favorites. @aintexactlyrossi shared a sentimental story about preparing his ZRX for sale, ultimately deciding to keep it because of the joy it brings, showcasing the connection many riders have with this model.
Negative: While there were no overtly negative comments, @thereddevil's comment about being too tall to ride the bike highlights a limitation some may experience. Additionally, @MrFeldman wished Kawasaki had continued to import the bike, indicating a sense of loss for fans of the model who feel it could be improved with modern features. Overall, the themes of nostalgia and desire for continued availability reflect a slight dissatisfaction among some enthusiasts.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ablejtw79 exclaimed that the vehicle is beautiful, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @boaboyoz described the car as 'magic,' particularly noting the striking Carrara White Metallic color combined with the Bordeaux Red and black interior, which adds to its allure. @h_bakken expressed admiration for the Carrara over red leather interior as a classic combination, sharing a personal anecdote about their own vehicle that garners attention and admiration, wishing the seller good luck.
Neutral: @LawrenceKFloyd (The Seller) confirmed that the car underwent significant performance upgrades, including a Stage 1 GIAC Tune and exhaust work done at a certified Porsche dealership, and provided details on maintenance records, confirming they are all in hand. He mentioned the remaining warranty of 100,000 miles and noted all services conducted at reputable Porsche locations. Further, he stated that the car has undergone quality inspections with no visible wear or damage reported by the dealership.
Negative: @SofiaLeo questioned the warranty expiration date, suggesting it may have already expired, casting doubt on the vehicle's warranty status. @P-Car828 raised concerns about possible hidden issues, such as the steering wheel's appearance, tail light condition, and whether any bodywork had been performed. @Rknutt10 mentioned having a similar steering wheel in their vehicle, which fueled speculation about the car's interior consistency. Overall, there were inquiries about the vehicle’s condition that suggested a cautious approach to potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Todd_Z. appreciates the upgrades such as the newer power steering and disc brakes, highlighting the enhancements made to the vehicle. @DUGEEEFRESH04 finds the OBS truck very appealing and notes the considerable work invested in its restoration, wishing the seller good luck. @bxyacshack (The Seller) confirms that the truck can indeed be used as a daily driver, mentioning that it has undergone significant mechanical restoration with all systems being rebuilt or upgraded recently in 2022.
Neutral: @carata expresses curiosity about the vehicle's suitability as a daily driver and inquires if the seller is available for a viewing on the weekend. @galairdo asks specifically about the condition and repairs of the vehicle's roof and windshield, seeking clarity on the status of rust repairs. @carata also questions the truck's fuel efficiency, wanting to know about its miles per gallon rate, to which @bxyacshack (The Seller) responds.
Negative: @TidyRigs raises concerns about visible bondo cracks in the truck's body, suggesting potential issues with the repair work. While @bxyacshack (The Seller) addresses this concern by referencing before photos of the paint and body work, the implied worry about the quality of past repairs remains a notable topic in the conversation.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @39mercman describes the vehicle as a very nice little Ford pickup, and highlights its unique hood characteristics. @wesellptc affirms @39mercman's observation about the hood being from a ’40 model while sharing their own experiences with similar pickups and wishing good luck for the auction. @Cadigirl calls the truck amazing and appreciates its value as a piece of American history, while @ACN968 expresses interest in seeing a classic 351C engine under the hood, indicating a positive attitude toward potential upgrades.
Neutral: @CactusKing, the seller, expresses a bittersweet sentiment about needing to sell the truck to thin out their collection of toys. They mention that the vehicle is ready for sale and turns heads, receiving many compliments as the most admired vehicle they've owned. This comment reflects a neutral perspective on the truck’s popularity, acknowledging both its value and the seller’s emotional attachment.
Negative: @55meter inquires about the history of the truck's engine, specifically asking if there was a donor vehicle, a rebuild, or any modifications done. They seem to be probing for clarity about the engine's past, which could indicate concerns or curiosity about the vehicle's reliability or history. @CactusKing responds by confirming that the engine was rebuilt by a local builder, stating that it runs great and has good power, but the initial query hints at a potential worry about the truck's overall condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beautiful design and notable features. @Dollycat3 describes the Mark IV as a wonderful car with a stunning interior and rare factory sunroof, while @lincolnsandcaddies reminisces fondly about past models, showcasing a strong appreciation for the brand's legacy. Furthermore, @OCEquestrian reflects on the significance of the car in 1976 and suggests that it is a desirable collectors' item, reinforcing its status as a classic.
Neutral: Several commenters seek more information about the vehicle, including @Dbackfan416 who requests pictures of the door panels and @ModernMode who inquires about the storage conditions. @SCHOLAR raises questions regarding the service history and the age of the tires, indicating a need for clarity on the car’s maintenance before purchasing. @VinnytheBlade also asks for the vehicle's location, showing interest yet needing logistics to be clarified.
Negative: There are hints of concern regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly from @SCHOLAR, who notes that the tires are around 12 years old based on date codes. Although @JohnsRedMustang1994 (The Seller) assures that the tires are relatively new and that service records are available, @carlep raises a query about whether everything functions as it should, suggesting potential unease among prospective buyers about the car's operational status.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Ant5842 expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic, particularly the TT silver smoke color, indicating it looks enjoyable to ride. @trailerjoe shared a nostalgic connection, recalling his father-in-law's similar bike from the 1970s, which he loved. @SuperKram praised the bike for its tight, clean condition, stating that a well-sorted airhead is a joy to own and ride, especially with the specified Dellorto carbs, adding to its appeal. @Motogrotto complimented the alignment of the pinstriping, highlighting the attention to detail in restoration, which many overlook.
Neutral: @mm8819 (The Seller) provided several informative updates about the bike, including recent maintenance like a new battery and professional pinstripes added shortly before the auction. This was in response to inquiries regarding the original parts and modifications made to the bike. @Mouse51 questioned the absence of mounting brackets on the saddle bags, to which @mm8819 confirmed they exist and were photographed from a previous owner. Discussions included technical details on carburetors and the bike's gauge cluster, with @NorCalif suggesting the carb marking should be visible when inspected properly and @Oldbikedude raising concerns about the accuracy of the gauge cluster and rotor specifications.
Negative: @rbikerescue pointed out that the rear gear ratio was different from what is standard for this model, suggesting it might have been modified, potentially affecting performance. @Oldbikedude raised skepticism about the gauge cluster's authenticity, indicating it might not be correct for a 1974 model and casting doubt on the reported mileage. Additionally, @SuperKram clarified that the cross-drilled rotors mentioned in the listing were not available on 1974 bikes, leading to some inconsistencies regarding the bike's advertised features.
2002 Toyota Tacoma SR5 Double Cab V6 4x4
5TEHN72N22Z035454
Lot 189404
Additional charges from this dealer: USD $0
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dollycat3 described the vehicle as a "sweet beauty" while @TacomaLX (The Seller) emphasized that this is an excellent one-owner Tacoma Crew Cab 4x4, with a super clean exterior and immaculate interior. They highlighted that the truck runs smoothly, the transmission shifts well, and all power options work as they should, creating an overall impression of a reliable and well-maintained vehicle. Additionally, they noted that mechanically, the truck is in sound condition, having been well looked after in its life in Encinitas, CA. The underbody is reported to be clean and free from rust or damage, making it a great find for prospective buyers.
Neutral: @YennaM questioned the lack of exterior stickers or badges, wondering if the vehicle comes with the TRD Off Road Package. @TacomaLX (The Seller) confirmed that the truck does not feature the TRD package, primarily due to the absence of a locking rear differential, which is a key aspect of that package. @sjcyclist asked about the bed size, to which @TacomaLX (The Seller) responded with measurements. Additionally, @sf762 acknowledged that the truck is clean but raised concerns about potential rust seen in some components, speculating on its history and maintenance due to recent pitting and rust on various parts.
Negative: @sf762 expressed doubt regarding the truck's condition, mentioning signs of rust on areas that are typically not expected for a California vehicle, while also inquiring about the authenticity of the truck's history. @stevefi12345 mentioned the presence of a location on the Carfax that could explain the rust, questioning why it would appear on the report if it wasn’t an issue for the vehicle. These comments suggest that there are concerns about the vehicle's rust and overall historical authenticity, which could affect potential buyers' perceptions.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle, highlighting its low mileage and impressive modifications. @98WS6 noted it's refreshing to see a car that has been actively used instead of sitting idle, showcasing its true purpose as a performance vehicle. The car's history and previous achievements in competitions were also appreciated, with @6TVRs recalling its championship victories, while @JayKay2430 praised the previous era of Chevrolet for allowing more enthusiast-oriented configurations without excessive options like air conditioning or power windows.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions around the vehicle's specifications, with @MS3DALE providing insights about its stereo equipment and @purelypmd inquiring about original parts. @bsannich mentioned that the car had previously been listed on a different platform, suggesting that the current auction could offer interesting comparisons. The conversations included factual clarifications about the car's features, such as the front fog lights being omitted intentionally from the 1LE models, as noted by @DannyRayMichel and @MS3DALE.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the seller's responsiveness and missing original parts. @thebuick mentioned sending a message with no response, while @derekb (The Seller) claimed to have replied multiple times. Additionally, @98WS6 expressed disappointment over the absence of aftermarket modifications, specifically an aftermarket chip to optimize performance. Furthermore, @DannyRayMichel questioned the removal of iconic fog lights, implying a loss of character for the IROC-Z model.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, particularly its mileage, color combination, and overall condition. @gscharnagl notes that it's a perfect option for someone seeking a Florida convertible, while @MikeinHboro praises it as a gem compared to their own '95 R129. @calisomb highlights the stunning Black Opal color and appreciates the pristine condition of the interior and undercarriage. Others, like @jagbit, express envy for the vehicle's quality and recommend potential buyers contact @Dean_Laumbach directly for more information, emphasizing the value of his R129 offerings. Multiple users commend the detailed and trustworthy presentation by Dean, reinforcing confidence in the car's quality and Dean's reputation as a seller.
Neutral: Comments also include inquiries and observations about the vehicle's history and condition. For example, @67benzboy asks about potential flood damage and notes the pitting on the dash gauge panel, which @Dean_Laumbach responds to by assuring that the car is in original condition and free of water intrusion. @JKG2828 raises questions regarding the functionality of the memory seat buttons and requests clearer pictures of the dashboard, indicating potential concerns that some bidders may have. Furthermore, discussions related to the auction process and the market value of the R129 also provide context for the vehicle's appraisal and desirability among collectors.
Negative: Conversely, a few comments reflect skepticism or concern regarding the auction results and the vehicle's value. @aleccartio expresses confusion over a low bid that doesn't align with the car's assessed worth, based on their own experiences selling similar models. @67benzboy's inquiry about flood damage, while answered positively, suggests a cautionary attitude towards the car's history. The comments from @CICBarkeep and @stathios provide additional clarifications on the dashboard issue, yet highlight that such minor imperfections could be potential red flags for discerning buyers. Overall, there's a mix of caution and enthusiasm among the commenters, balancing the excitement for the vehicle with due diligence in evaluating its condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its rarity and unique features. @yobtah referred to it as a 'cooler JDM cousin' of the Geo Storm, while @Discobob found the combination of turbo and AWD intriguing and fun. @boaboyoz noted that the car is 'fabulous, fascinating, and cool,' and @RickRossThaBoss wished they could have seen it driving around. Owners also praised the vehicle's performance and functional aspects, with @kirkeliel mentioning their enjoyment of the car and its family-friendliness. The seller, @JORA_Imports, emphasized that the car is daily driver ready and well-maintained, further reassuring potential buyers.
Neutral: Many commenters also provided insights and relevant queries about the vehicle, indicating a general interest in its condition and specifications. @sharpe_corners asked about the inspection of rear wheel bearings, which are known to be difficult to replace, while @alexlrose93 reiterated the same concerns. @Tom_R. offered practical advice for future battery replacements, and @highmileage suggested joining a Facebook group dedicated to Isuzu sport compact owners. The seller addressed these inquiries by stating that they have had the car inspected and confirmed its excellent condition, and that they have access to parts which may be difficult to source in the U.S.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the vehicle's age and parts availability. @sharpe_corners and @alexlrose93 expressed worries about potential misfiring issues and the availability of rear wheel bearings, which could be a significant issue given the car's age. @JORA_Imports acknowledged these concerns, mentioning that while the car is older and may have small flaws, it remains an exceptional piece of automotive history and is well-preserved. The seller urged commenters to remember the car's unique status and reassured that parts can be sourced without difficulty.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments highlight the vehicle's beauty and maintenance history. @shelbyhertz2006 described it as a beautiful Hertz with attractive touches, reflecting a general appreciation for its aesthetics. @TWC shared fond memories of owning a similar model, emphasizing the enjoyment experienced while driving it. The seller, @Sgkochran1122, confirmed the car's excellent condition, highlighting aspects like the convertible top's quality, the functionality of the Shaker 500 audio system, and the car’s limited use, with just under 20,000 miles since 2008.
Neutral: Comments also showcase a variety of inquiries from potential buyers. @pokemon55 raised multiple technical questions about the vehicle's engine health, transmission fluid service, and overall maintenance history, seeking a comprehensive understanding of its condition. The seller provided thorough answers, stating that there had been no recent compression tests but confirmed the absence of oil consumption and reported that the transmission works well. This exchange reflects a collaborative effort between the seller and interested buyers to gauge the vehicle's condition accurately.
Negative: While most comments are positive or neutral, there were hints of disappointment from a few users. @Purpleman expressed frustration about being outbid, indicating competitiveness in the auction environment. Additionally, some concerns were raised about the vehicle's early rental life, with @pokemon55 questioning the maintenance records during that period, which may leave doubts regarding its past usage. However, the seller reassured everyone that the car was well-maintained under personal care, especially since it has only been driven minimally for years.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters are genuinely impressed by the vehicle, highlighting its amazing qualities and beautiful build. @Beans_Bacon describes it as 'literally amazing,' while @kkellynan wishes they could afford it. @Stallion101 appreciates the truck's build quality, labeling it 'cool,' and @boaboyoz finds it fantastic and awesome, praising its Dark Brown Metallic color and commenting positively on the seller. Overall, there is a strong sense of admiration for the truck's design and capabilities, with several users expressing enthusiasm for its potential as a family hauler or for hauling purposes.
Neutral: Several users have questions regarding the vehicle's specifications and features. @Crazy_Canadian asks about the turning radius, to which @Platinummotorspdx responds with an estimate of about two city blocks. Meanwhile, @DMCperformancegarage inquires about any known issues, to which the seller notes a slight seep but confirms the vehicle's A/C is functional albeit needing a recharge. The discussions about specifications seem to indicate a high interest in knowing more about the vehicle's practicalities and condition.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, there are some concerns regarding the truck. @Kizarsoza mentions a desire for a 6x6 configuration, indicating the current setup may not fully meet all users' needs. Additionally, @Knuckles-R-Busted expresses that the truck would benefit from taller sidewalls for added credibility, while @DMCperformancegarage raises concerns about potential leaks or mechanical problems. The seller has also found it necessary to remind a frequent commenter to keep inquiries relevant, indicating some frustrations may be brewing amid the enthusiasm.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Competitioncars highlights numerous features of the low-mile 2024 Land Rover Defender Carpathian Edition, stating that it is essentially like buying a new car with only 5,200 miles on it. The seller also points out the extensive feature list and reassures potential buyers about the vehicle’s appeal, mentioning its perfect Carfax and the fact that it smells new. Additionally, @Competitioncars actively engages with interested parties, providing regular updates, including interior reviews, driving videos, and correcting any listing inaccuracies.
Neutral: Several comments reflect on the vehicle's background, such as @lagunadallas pointing out its Montana registration and the favorable comparison of its interior color to more common options. @neverenoughgold humorously mentions a family member's previous interest in a different model and indicates that he will share the listing with them. @MerlinsGarage and @DHVT inquire about specific features regarding the vehicle's performance and options, showing a general interest but seeking clarifications on certain specifications.
Negative: @MdotWoods raises concerns about potentially missing parts for the jack, which prompts @Competitioncars to investigate the issue further. Additionally, @Airsh001 questions why the vehicle is being sold after only having driven 5,000 miles, hinting at the possibility of there being less favorable reasons behind the sale. There is a notable sense of skepticism in some inquiries that suggests potential buyers are weighing their options carefully, possibly questioning the vehicle's selling narrative.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its unique appeal, particularly with @Scarlett65 expressing love for the multi-color interior and exterior white stripe, suggesting it might fetch a high value at auction. @Corvair1968Owner (The Seller) mentioned that the car achieved an impressive score at the 24th Corvair National Convention Concours, and appreciates the recognition from fellow enthusiasts like @PhilVair and @MARTY_ROTH, celebrating the strong presence of Corvairs in the classic car marketplace at BaT. @500_PM considers the license plate "UNSAFE" as one of the best personalized plates ever, emphasizing its distinctiveness.
Neutral: The conversation also reveals various auction dynamics, with @MARTY_ROTH noting that there are currently six live Corvair auctions happening, indicating a healthy interest in these vehicles at this time. @PhilVair remarks on the growing number of Corvair auctions, suggesting a favorable trend for Corvair owners, which @Corvair1968Owner (The Seller) corroborates by expressing excitement about the increasing attention and love for Corvairs in the marketplace.
Negative: On the downside, @Gord6 raised a concern about the potential rust on the car, a common issue among classic vehicles that could affect buyer interest. Additionally, @SirCharlz humorously pointed out that many Corvair owners choose the "UNSAFE" plate, sometimes even displaying it upside down until stopped, which may allude to the car's controversial safety reputation. However, @jtcrawf55 defended the vehicle by referencing its historical context, saying that external competition, particularly from the Mustang, played a significant role in diminishing the Corvair's reputation.
4,900-Mile 2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 Inaugural Edition
2B3CJ7DJ0BH505087
Lot 189392
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Beans_Bacon enthusiastically describes the vehicle as a "beaut" in a way reminiscent of Steve Irwin's praise, highlighting its appeal. @RASVIPER7 expresses admiration for its aesthetics and is considering checking it out in person, indicating it has caught his attention. @SRTMagnum adds to the enthusiasm by commenting that the car would look great in his garage, showcasing the vehicle's desirability among potential buyers.
Neutral: @maschnurr, the seller, confirms that the vehicle has never been smoked in and has not been driven in Colorado's snowy or salty conditions, providing a reassuring note about its maintenance history. @EngineCo345 inquired about the inclusion of a factory MOPAR car cover, and @maschnurr clarified that while a blue cover is provided, it is not a Mopar brand one. @Joseph.barrow offers a technical perspective, discussing the vehicle's engine as a significant upgrade that responds to competitive models from other manufacturers.
Negative:
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle for its impressive build quality and unique features. @39mercman called it an awesome machine while @boaboyoz referred to it as a beautiful Brittany Blue Bronco and a 'Georgia Peach.' The color combination of blue and white was highlighted as perfect by @artpirate333, and @Sffan15 agreed, complimenting its sick color and overall build. Overall, the vehicle has generated excitement and admiration from potential bidders and enthusiasts alike.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed a desire for clarification regarding the specifications of the vehicle, particularly concerning the engine and transmission details. @bringatrailer noted that the seller was asked to confirm the specifications due to discrepancies found in the provided build sheet. @ak56yr4t, the seller, acknowledged previous inconsistencies about the engine and transmission and provided a more accurate update after consulting with Vintage Broncos, emphasizing their credibility in verifying the details. Many users are seeking further answers and are interested in viewing the vehicle before bidding.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, there have been criticisms related to claims about the vehicle's components. @thiswildbronco raised concerns about the accuracy of the plenum cover and engine identification, suggesting it might indicate a Gen1 engine installed on a Gen2 motor. Additionally, @935DP and @TMax8 criticized @Broncotime for making potential misstatements during the auction, with calls to reassess their comments in the context of other auctions. The overall discourse reflects some tension regarding accurate information and the integrity of the auction process.
Single-Family-Owned 18k-Mile 2007 Chevrolet Corvette Convertible 3LT
1G1YY36U975112745
Lot 189403
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @1974pantera describes the car as gorgeous and a source of pride for its owner, emphasizing its awesome color. @GLWS notes that it is a really nice Corvette convertible, suggesting it would make for an enjoyable driving experience. @68CamaroSS396L78 calls it a beautiful C6 and has high expectations for its performance during the auction. @ACN968 admires the vehicle's color, highlighting its fabulous appearance in different lighting, and expresses hope that it goes to a loving owner.
Neutral: @Twisterfly (The Seller) shares insights about the Corvette's condition, mentioning it has been garage kept since purchase and covered during winters, attributing its cleanliness to careful maintenance. They also express a desire to share driving experiences and are willing to provide more information as needed. The seller acknowledges their lack of time and space to enjoy the vehicle and prepares to take it out for a final drive, indicating their emotional connection to the car.
Negative: While the comments are overwhelmingly positive, the underlying regret from @Twisterfly (The Seller) about letting the car go could be viewed as a negative aspect. Their mention of the car needing better driving conditions and sunshine suggests that the sales decision comes from frustration with the local environment, implying that the vehicle could not be fully appreciated in its current setting.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as a "wonderful, elegant beauty with so much to love," indicating strong appreciation for its aesthetic qualities. Additionally, @Knuckles-R-Busted expresses enthusiasm about the vehicle's prospects without being a potential buyer, highlighting a general admiration for excellent driving vehicles. Furthermore, @lukaszkrolak (The Seller) provides practical information about the location of their business, which might be helpful for prospective buyers looking for logistics.
Neutral: Comments from @OWLBYRD and @Sunoco260 emphasize the need for improved photography and better lighting to assess the vehicle's condition accurately. @Sunoco260 also outlines significant concerns related to the brakes, engine, and cosmetics without assigning a decisive positive or negative sentiment. This balanced discourse suggests that while there are merits to the vehicle, additional clarity on its condition is necessary for potential buyers.
Negative: Several commenters expressed concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly its engine and brake issues. @michaelcarney points out that the engine sounded rough, requesting clarification regarding its health. @MadDog63 echoes this sentiment about the engine's condition, stating that the temperature gauge is pegged Hot, which raises concerns about potential issues. Furthermore, @Sunoco260 details major value determinants including potential costs for repairs, while @Rover questions the rear end's height, fearing problems with the rear springs. Overall, these comments paint a troubling picture of the vehicle's current state.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @austin_alfa appreciates the potential for restoration and notes the project's complexity, indicating familiarity with the car and its community. @Arthur7 shares optimism about the car's ease of repair and the availability of parts, suggesting that the hydraulic system is manageable for someone willing to learn. @griffisretired has had a positive experience purchasing from the seller, indicating reliability in logistics and service.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the history and characteristics of the vehicle, acknowledging modifications that have been made over the years. @JohnT mentions discrepancies in the car's ID and condition, which raises questions about its authenticity. Others, like @Citroenuar, reflect on the unique aspects of this Citroen's production history in Mexico, suggesting that there is more to this vehicle than meets the eye.
Negative: @stanela expresses concerns over the economic viability of restoration, calling it uneconomic. @Valkyrja warns that project cars can be challenging and not suitable for everyone, emphasizing the potential difficulties ahead. @Logoman55 inquires about engine tests, indicating uncertainty about the car's functionality, while @UK_USA bluntly states the car is worth more in parts than as a whole, reflecting a lack of faith in the restoration prospects.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the truck, with @boaboyoz highlighting its attractive colors and build quality. @fivespeedv8 describes it as a great truck and appreciates the recent air conditioning conversion that involved significant investment. @Tomcat reminisces about enjoying a similar model, praising its functionality and the attention it garners. @MPreston454 and @MPreston465 also voice their appreciation, noting the truck's beauty and inquiry about its specifications, with the seller providing detailed affirmations that enhance the truck's appeal.
Neutral: @joepanora01, the seller, provides clarifications regarding various inquiries, mentioning the dimensions of the truck and explaining the decision to spray the bed liner for aesthetics and protection, even though the bed remains in good shape. Another neutral point comes from @fivespeedv8's questions concerning the auxiliary fuel tank switch which @joepanora01 confirms was removed for a cleaner appearance. The seller also addresses inquiries about the engine's condition and previous work done, maintaining that the original engine is still intact and functional, further elaborating on the vehicle's history.
Negative: Some commenters raise concerns about potential issues, such as @48hdob's initial questioning about the need for a sprayed bed liner, implying worries about the truck's condition. @fivespeedv8 also probes into the absence of a second fuel tank and mentions possible vibrations, which may suggest uncertainties about the truck's restoration quality. @67COOP questions the original mileage and operational status of the vehicle, pointing to potential red flags regarding reliability. These concerns reflect a cautious approach from some potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle's stunning color, Cyclamen Red Pearl, highlighting it as one of the rarest colors available for the Porsche 944. @GDogg remarked that it is a stunning hue, while @GLWTA and @dkyranakis shared their love for the color combination, with @p928sfan also describing it as great. @Darinj described it as one gorgeous S2 Cab, and @kodibear praised its handling and performance, stating that future owners would not be disappointed. @PaulLittell invested time in the video and acknowledged that the color beats others he has owned, further underlining the car’s appeal. Overall, the consensus among those who commented positively is that the vehicle is visually striking and rare.
Neutral: @AJL1988, the seller, conveyed comprehensive information about the car's history, noting its prior ownership in Arizona and meticulous servicing that contributed to its excellent condition. The seller awaits any questions and highlights their extensive experience on BaT as a credible seller, offering potential buyers the chance for thorough inspections and providing assistance with shipping. Multiple users, including @SixteenVentiler, noted that the leather seats may have been replaced, which @AJL1988 confirmed, pointing toward modifications made during earlier ownership. The seller is also preparing additional video content to showcase the car further, ensuring transparency in the vehicle's presentation.
Negative: The comments reflect a few areas of concern regarding the vehicle's condition, with @PaulLittell mentioning some cosmetic imperfections on the paintwork, including nicks and minor issues. @DHD997 raised a question about modifications made to the top mechanisms, hinting that while modifications can be beneficial, details were sought for clarity. Additionally, @shapeskis questioned a clunking sound heard during a driving video, to which @AJL1988 clarified that it was merely due to Michigan roads and not indicative of a problem with the car itself. Although there are some minor issues highlighted, the overall mechanical and driving condition of the Porsche remains praised.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @HowardHechtsFriend expressed excitement and surprise over the car's extremely low mileage, likening it to a museum piece, noting that their own 2011 model with 15,000 miles seemed high in comparison. @Gmurrayl mentioned that despite personal preferences against automatic transmissions, they appreciated the uniqueness of the vehicle and its potential as a great purchase. @p1_motorcars_ltd (The Seller) detailed the car's impressive characteristics, including a newly serviced drivetrain, fresh tires, and an automatic transmission that enhances the driving experience, emphasizing that the car retains the essence of Lotus performance while also offering comfort and convenience features.
Neutral: Comments by @CarNutMiami and @SVXRide sought clarification on the vehicle's ownership history and its maintenance records, indicating a curiosity about the car's time at dealerships versus private ownership. @E55 raised questions about the number of service records, wondering if having 16 records in just 1,500 miles was typical, which signals a desire for clarity regarding the car's maintenance pedigree. @Bdyson and @jsh0450 both inquired about specific cosmetic issues, such as the A-pillar, indicating a need for more information to assess the vehicle's condition accurately.
Negative: @danbrown100 commented that while automatic versions of this car exist, they believe manual versions are superior, highlighting a potential bias against the automatic transmission offered here. @Gmurrayl also mentioned skepticism about automatic transmissions in general, implying discomfort with this particular model. @4ZA questioned the discrepancy between temporary registration durations provided by the seller, expressing concern about receiving accurate information and creating possible confusion for potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @debtsandbooze praised the vehicle, calling it the best in the Evo business. @p1_motorcars_ltd highlighted that this mostly original Evolution V GSR is a nice driver with reasonable mileage and extensive mechanical work to ensure reliability, including a fresh timing belt and new tires. They also expressed their passion for early generation Evos and the care taken in preparing the vehicle for sale, which resonates positively with potential buyers.
Neutral: @myboynacho expressed surprise at the lack of audience engagement, pointing out the car's quality yet questioning the noise captured in videos. @p1_motorcars_ltd responded, clarifying that the driving video noises were due to the microphone placement in the trunk. They assured that no abnormal cabin noises were present and detailed the car's suspension components, indicating an eagerness to answer questions and keep potential buyers informed.
Negative: @myboynacho also expressed frustration regarding constant noises while driving, which could detract from the overall experience. @Overthunkt raised concerns about potential rust under the undercoating in pictures, leading @dos531 to share hesitations about bidding due to these visual signs. Furthermore, @myboynacho suggested inspecting the affected areas to assess rust severity, reflecting a common worry among interested buyers about the car's condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors have expressed excitement about the improved horsepower of the Cayman S, particularly highlighting the upgraded TPC Racing turbocharger kit which claims to provide 460hp. @billcawley thinks it's "pretty cool," while @MasonTVM assures bidders that the car handles remarkably well post-upgrade and promises a driving video for potential buyers to experience this enhancement. The vehicle's aesthetic upgrades, including a redone alcantara interior, have also garnered appreciation from viewers, with @MasonTVM being proactive in providing detailed answers and updates during the auction process.
Neutral: There were several inquiries regarding the vehicle's modifications and previous usage. Commentors like @wildcat767676 wanted to know about the cooling system for track use, while @camarocane asked detailed questions about maintenance procedures that had been applied to the vehicle, specifically relating to the engine. The seller, @MasonTVM, responded with clarifications about the lack of track testing and confirmed that certain parts, such as chain guides, were deemed unnecessary for replacement by a mechanic. Concerns regarding the red dash light visible in driving videos were also addressed, emphasizing transparency in communication.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's functionality and prior maintenance. Some potential buyers, like @spokayman, questioned why the owner was selling so soon after significant investment in upgrades and what records existed for maintenance and repairs, indicating potential unease about the purchase. Additionally, references to a check passenger seat maintenance message highlighted some unresolved electrical issues related to the aftermarket GT3 seats, creating doubts about the car's overall reliability. Such comments suggest that there may be lingering apprehensions that could affect buyer confidence in the auction.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @John_M raises an interesting point about the Nissan Murano convertible, which seemingly serves as inspiration for this unique vehicle. @DeltaMikeX150 expresses a strong admiration, declaring it their "BaT crush of the day." @Tcaputo affirms the car's character, describing it as super cool and wishing good luck to the auction. Additionally, @WAGONBOYTD reflects positively on the vehicle's aesthetic, noting the appealing Russet Brown color and the potential enjoyment it could bring to a new owner.
Neutral: Comments also touch on various features and inquiries regarding the vehicle's design and function. @RobTX requests additional images of the gated shifter mentioned in the drive video, while @GotClutch inquires about the chassis reinforcement post soft-top conversion. @Type44 shares insights from an RRC owner’s perspective regarding body and frame interaction, suggesting that the design offers robust structural integrity. Auction details are highlighted by @EBERNEY, who mentions the limited time remaining and encourages bidders to consider the investment made by the previous owner.
Negative: Conversely, there are criticisms regarding some aspects of the vehicle. @SeattleRRC finds the power soft top's operation frustratingly slow, equating it to watching grass grow, while @mettelman questions the necessity of the vehicle's design, suggesting it answers a question that was not asked. @bigdogandy disparagingly describes the car as "stupid," contrasting their feelings with an intense desire to own it, which reflects mixed sentiments about the car's overall appeal. Concerns about stability are also raised by @WAGONBOYTD, who likens the convertible's structure to a "milk carton on a skateboard." This mix of admiration and skepticism provides a comprehensive view of the vehicle's reception among viewers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters were highly complimentary of the vehicle, praising it as an epitome of beauty and excellence. @Singerirv described it as "gorgeous, simply gorgeous," while @Lumsdengr remarked on the beautifully done restoration, noting that the level of detail and polish was higher than what left the factory. @Dollycat3 expressed admiration for the car's stunning color combination, calling it "very sexy and elegant." @Dan219 even went as far as saying it's a restoration from another planet, signifying that the workmanship is out of this world. Multiple users such as @gibber4468 and @Noisyboyz highlighted its aesthetics, with @gibber4468 noting it might be the prettiest car they have ever seen and wishing the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: Several comments addressed aspects of the vehicle's historical significance and technical specifications without expressing strong opinions. @JB1952 was curious about the engine details, while @AZGuy01 asked if the car would have had open headlights from the factory. @davidxk provided insight regarding how headlight coverage varied by market during the vehicle's production years. Commenters like @tompdx shared their knowledge about discrepancies in model specifications, indicating the complexity of identifying original features based on VINs and manufacturing details. @Shauneagle, the seller, took the opportunity to clarify the authenticity and condition of the car, aim to alleviate concerns raised by buyers about the dash appearance and original features.
Negative: A few commenters expressed concerns about certain details of the restoration. @Jsalomon noted discoloration on the dashboard in some photos, while @Citizenkane210 questioned why the dash wasn't refurbished if it appeared bad. @Hardley concurred that the dash required a redo and also pointed out the need to hear the vehicle's performance. Despite these critiques, most conversations circled back to the car's overall appeal, with sellers like @Shauneagle working diligently to address and quell buyer apprehensions through active engagement.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @xjhigg expresses excitement about offering a MK1 Cabriolet to the BaT community, highlighting its low mileage, beautiful red interior, and iconic white paint and wheels. The extensive photo gallery and videos included are designed to showcase the vehicle's features, including cold starts and walk-arounds, providing transparency regarding its condition. The seller is eager to answer any questions and is actively engaging with potential bidders, indicating a commitment to customer service.
Neutral: @vw81jetta inquires about what appears to be seam sealer or rust near critical components of the vehicle, as well as the status of the timing belt, while @LongDucDong talks about a nostalgic connection to the vehicle through a song associated with it. Other commentors like @Seattle762002 suggest the presence of dried cosmoline in the engine bay due to its coastal origins, and @THenry points out the likely manufacturer of the convertible's build, with @xjhigg confirming this with photos.
Negative: @thedigdug notes that the vehicle has seen slow bidding activity, suggesting that concerns over rust may be deterring potential purchasers. @originaljeeps shares their experience visiting the car previously, noting the challenges it faced from its proximity to the bay and alluding to issues with corrosion. These comments reflect a cautious sentiment among those interested, pointing out potential drawbacks while observing the vehicle's charm.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @V8_Vantage describes the vehicle as beautiful, reflecting on their own experience with a similar model before switching to a BMW. @Mark_P expresses a personal bias favoring the car's color combination, appreciating its original Spica system compared to a Weber conversion. Overall, comments like those from @dshimberg577 highlight the car's beauty and well-maintained condition, suggesting a strong bidding outcome, while @wtbid affirms the car's good state in a lovely color scheme.
Neutral: @AJL1988, the seller, provides detailed information about the vehicle's history, ownership, and maintenance, indicating its well-cared-for condition with service records dating back to 2000. The car has been predominantly housed in Arizona, and has undergone notable repairs and enhancements, including a recent Bluetooth radio installation. Seller responses also show engagement with potential buyers, indicating more videos and information are forthcoming, demonstrating transparency.
Negative: Some comments point out potential issues with the vehicle. @CAPTBob mentions that the suspension appears too high, and @Autobroker supports this observation, speculating about the springs. @Synodontis raises a concern regarding the car's engine history, wondering about the mileage when it was purchased in 1988. Additionally, @DriversWanted queries why the horn hasn't been addressed, hinting at the need for some minor adjustments despite the car's overall good condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The Land Rover Defender 90 has received several compliments for its unique style and potential as a fun work truck. Commentors such as @ADS90 and @SONORANROVERS appreciate the vibrant color, considering it fitting for summer and possibly enhancing its appeal with some creative livery. @WAGONBOYTD praised the addition of the backup camera, seeing it as a significant feature for practicality, while the seller noted that the color, although not for everyone, certainly stands out. Furthermore, the vehicle has been well-maintained with various updates and servicing, marking it as a solid option for those looking for a rugged truck.
Neutral: Comments reflected that the vehicle could serve as a capable work truck, especially given its size and storage options, which the seller confirmed. The potential for easy modifications, such as removing the rear section of the truck, was also discussed, offering flexibility for potential buyers. @WAGONBOYTD and @SONORANROVERS pointed out the need for a thorough inspection, particularly regarding the chassis due to visible welding, which indicates previous repairs, though this did not diminish the overall interest in the vehicle's reliability and usability.
Negative: Some negative aspects highlighted by the community include concerns about rust and cosmetic blemishes on the exterior, as noted by @WAGONBOYTD and @SONORANROVERS, both of whom mentioned expected rust issues due to the vehicle's UK origins. Further issues such as a non-flush passenger door and slight interior rattles were raised, although the seller was transparent about these imperfections. @Codified's question about reversing indicated some apprehension regarding visibility and maneuverability, leading to a recommendation of the integrated reverse camera as a solution.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the performance and driving experience of the S65, highlighting its impressive power with one remark stating, "When you press the gas, there's a feeling unlike anything you’ve ever driven," emphasizing the car's exhilarating experience. @bermudaboy (The Seller) expressed pride in the car's upkeep and its mechanical condition, noting substantial care and maintenance dedicated by professional technicians. @Static50 noted the auction’s potential, referencing that bidding seemed low for such a desirable vehicle, while @427ls7 endorsed the seller's integrity, asserting confidence that bidders wouldn’t find a better sorted S65 AMG.
Neutral: Several commenters mentioned the vehicle's Parktronic feature, noting its sporadic functionality, with @lionsfan54 and @Chest_Rockwell confirming similar issues from their experiences with first-generation W221s. While some mentioned software updates could minimize errors, @Static50 noted that he never needed it and would just turn it off. @bermudaboy (The Seller) detailed the maintenance history and discussed the car's brake condition through interactions with fellow commenters, providing technical data and addressing queries about the rotors and pads with transparency and diligence, indicating the maintenance performed by competent technicians.
Negative: Concerns about brake condition were prevalent among several commenters. @macmad30 pointed out signs of wear on the brake rotors and shock absorbers, suggesting that they appeared close to needing replacement, which @bermudaboy (The Seller) countered by stating that the brakes and rotors were still serviceable and showing no urgent need for replacement. @solutionsguy and @Germancollector300 voiced frustrations about common complaints affecting the auction, with one suggesting that commenters should not dwell on brake issues, considering the car's performance caliber. Discussions about potential maintenance costs prompted critiques of the vehicle, with some urging others to understand the implications of owning a high-performance luxury car like the S65.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, referring to the F-100 as a 'tasty, and spicy, piece of work' and wishing the seller luck with the sale (GLWTA!). @BlueJay26 adds to the positive remarks by complimenting the truck’s color and wishing good luck as well, while @RobChevelle shares a nostalgic view, reminiscing about his own similar truck in high school and showing appreciation for the specific color and model.
Neutral: @Danny53 asks about a potential tuning problem with the FiTech system, demonstrating interest in the vehicle’s performance capabilities. @Highvertical4, the seller, responds by clarifying that while the FiTech is self-tuning, those who wish to manually adjust settings might need the assistance of a specialist, indicating a hand on the complexity of tuning options available for the vehicle.
Negative: @Fastlane65 comments that the vehicle's appearance could benefit from a good pressure washing, implying that it may not be in the best condition visually. However, there are no strong negative comments that suggest severe issues, just observations on its upkeep.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GeoLineJDMImports highlights the 1996 Suzuki Carry 4WD mini truck's low mileage of only 63,000 km, which is approximately 39,000 miles, making it an appealing option for potential buyers. The seller notes its reliability, particularly for uses in farms, off-road adventures, or light-duty tasks, which speaks to its versatility and utility. The combination of a 4-speed manual transmission and selectable 4WD is also praised, indicating that the vehicle is well-equipped for different driving conditions.
Neutral: @GeoLineJDMImports maintains an open line of communication, inviting potential bidders to ask questions or request additional pictures and videos if needed. This shows the seller's willingness to provide transparency and support during the auction process, which may enhance buyer confidence. The seller emphasizes the remaining time on the auction, creating a sense of urgency among interested parties.
Negative: No negative comments were mentioned regarding the vehicle or the auction process in the provided comments. The absence of criticisms could reflect positively on the vehicle's perceived condition or the seller's reputation.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @gscharnagl praised the vehicle's rarity, highlighting the appealing color specification and noting that it is uncommon to find a 2014 model with low mileage, suggesting it should fetch a good price. @DNJX referred to the car as a "unicorn," further emphasizing its unique qualities. Overall, many commenters have expressed admiration for the car's aesthetics and condition, with @Jcbsat describing it as beautiful.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) detailed the car’s condition, explaining it is extremely clean with minimal imperfections. They mentioned that two videos would be posted soon to showcase these imperfections and the car's functionality. The seller also provided transparency about the vehicle history and encouraged potential buyers to ask questions and engage in the auction process, outlining their commitment to customer satisfaction and integrity.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle’s repair history and condition. @CirrusLee inquired about the two repairs listed on CARFAX and noted fluid spots that were seemingly visible in pictures. However, @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) clarified that the car has no leaks, attributing the liquid to cleaning supplies or detailing work. @Jcbsat also posed questions regarding past minor damages and whether there were issues with the suspension system, reflecting a cautious approach from some potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciated the thoroughness of the seller's responses and the inclusion of visual aids, such as a cold start and driving video, which was highlighted by @kristopherkoenig. @AlexKCMO expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle and shared a positive sentiment regarding the test drive, indicating excitement about seeing more performance, specifically highway acceleration. Furthermore, @AlexKCMO thanked the seller for their answers, maintaining a cordial interaction and wishing them luck with the sale.
Neutral: The seller, @kristopherkoenig, provided straightforward answers to inquiries from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's original color and the reasoning behind the short ownership period. They explained that they had purchased the car at a show and needed to sell it to accommodate their wife's preference for a different vehicle. @nmajerle asked about the trim work around the radio and glove box, but the seller didn't have additional information, indicating he sold it as-is without knowledge of any alterations.
Negative: There were a few minor concerns raised by commenters, such as @nmajerle's inquiry about the trim work around the radio and glove box, indicating a potential issue with the vehicle's interior. The seller's inability to provide details on this matter may deter some buyers who are concerned about the condition of these features. Additionally, @P5fjg5's question about whether a hardtop garage stand was included was met with a lack of favorable news from the seller, suggesting that such items were not part of the sale.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is presented as a well-maintained original 1998 E36 with low mileage, which is considered a great find by enthusiasts. Commentor @MasterDebator expresses enthusiasm over the vehicle, noting that clean E36s can be profitable. The seller @fixkars describes the car as a smooth-running model with no modifications, projecting a sense of reliability and authenticity. There's an acknowledgment of significant interest in the auction, with @fixkars mentioning 234 watchers, hinting at the vehicle's attractiveness to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments raise questions regarding the vehicle's condition, specifically regarding rust in certain areas. @dimitriparis inquires about rust on the body panels and undercarriage, while @SuperKram and @McLvN focus on the trunk area. The seller @fixkars provides transparent responses about the condition of the rust, indicating only minor corrosion exists while assuring potential bidders that they are fully informed about the vehicle's state. This communication helps maintain an open dialogue between the seller and potential buyers, making them feel more comfortable about the auction process.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the condition of the vehicle, particularly regarding rust. @dimitriparis and @SuperKram express their worries about possible rust affecting performance and aesthetics. @McLvN further indicates an unclear image of the floorboards showing potential rust issues. @fixkars responds to these worries, clarifying that the rust is only surface level and no serious damage is present, but the initial mentions of rust may deter some buyers who prioritize a completely rust-free vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @johnnyvett praises the vehicle, emphasizing its great design and wheel choice, stating that it looks dated with factory wheels, and expresses a deep attachment to their own 2008 model, which they've owned for 12 years. @StyleCars also promotes the 2003 Cadillac Escalade EXT Sport Pickup, highlighting its luxurious features and rugged capabilities, including a powerful 6.0-liter V8 engine, premium interior, and a clean Carfax report, making it a strong choice for buyers. @BayportLJ admires the wheels on the vehicle and receives detailed specs from @StyleCars, confirming the aftermarket performance design and quality, contributing positively to the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: @ericisrael42 asks whether the purchase would be through a dealer confirming that @StyleCars is a dealership. @stet548 inquires about potential recalls for the hydro-boost relief valve, to which @StyleCars responds affirmatively that there are no open recalls currently listed, clarifying potential confusion with reference to Land Rover recalls in their answer. Additionally, @StyleCars provides extensive towing information regarding the vehicle's capabilities, reinforcing clarity on its practical applications for those interested in utilitarian features alongside luxury.
Negative: @83HURST points out visible issues with the vehicle not shown in the listing, such as wear on the driver's seat and other minor imperfections, urging the seller not to gloss over such details. In response, @StyleCars acknowledges the concern and thanks @83HURST for the feedback, offering to provide more detailed photos of the noted imperfections which they aim to address for transparency. Furthermore, @stet548 expresses confusion regarding the recalls mentioned, prompting @StyleCars to clarify that their initial response was indeed about the Cadillac and not a Range Rover, indicating an oversight in communication.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @YELLADOG specifically praised the color, while @Copharr3 added that the Bridgehampton Blue is their favorite. Many found the overall look of the car appealing, even noting the well-maintained fender flares and big block hood as positive features, and @Copharr3 mentioned how it could be a suitable daily driver despite some vintage components.
Neutral: Several comments provided factual assessments of the car's year and condition. @estarrs (The Seller) clarified the car's VIN, confirming it as a 1970 model despite some 68/69 components, which prompted discussion about the discrepancies in its features. Commenters like @kevinckb6 and @Meflyfish sought further details about the car's original engine and missing fiber optics, indicating a desire for more transparency about its current state and any potential repairs.
Negative: Criticism was aimed at the vehicle's numerous modifications, with commenters like @CorvairGA and @johnnyvett pointing out that many parts did not align with a true 1970 model, suggesting extensive bodywork that could deter purists. @LS6CarGuy remarked on the non-original logo on the seats, and others echoed concerns about the mismatched flares and overall lack of originality. The need for additional photographs and inspections was a recurring theme among those expressing skepticism about the vehicle's authenticity.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Multiple comments praise the vehicle's originality and condition, highlighting it as a sweet and unmolested truck. @JacquesMerde appreciates its honest nature, while @Bear63 describes it as a nice-looking survivor that shows care and light use. @Hackberry notes the truck's value, particularly due to its smog-exempt status, and @okie_flats agrees, suggesting that the truck may hold more value where smog regulations are a concern. @omniball3000 (The Seller) confirms the truck's good condition, detailing updates such as new front shocks and power steering, and mentions that he used it as a daily driver without issues.
Neutral: Several commenters express interest in the truck's specific features and history, asking questions regarding its components and condition. @Smilinpat inquires about the original carburetor, while @Wyo2025 requests more photos of rust-prone areas. @Rkutzner and @ggregg1959 ask for startup and driving videos, with @omniball3000 (The Seller) admitting that he needs to adjust the choke timing but confirms that he has uploaded cold start and drive-by videos. The truck's gas mileage is also mentioned, with @omniball3000 stating it gets about 10mpg, which is notable but might not deter interested buyers.
Negative: A few concerns are raised about the truck, with @vintagevehicle commenting on its lack of value locally compared to other vintage vehicles in Utah, and @Bear63 pointing out small areas of rust that will need addressing. @Rockinronzo questions the logistics of bringing the truck to Canada, which might represent a barrier for some potential buyers. Additionally, @omniball3000 discusses challenges he faced with a VIN inspection because of missing emissions documentation, indicating potential regulatory hurdles for registration.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Cchowning95 describes the vehicle as a "true time capsule," highlighting its original features like cassette tapes and the original owner's insurance card from 1984, which adds to its nostalgic charm. Many commenters express admiration for the car's throwback appeal, praising its well-preserved condition and classic modifications. Comments from @JB455 and @CarDogThreePedals note how the car embodies the vibrant style of the early 80s, with details like the Hurst Lightning Rod shifter and iconic aesthetic elements, making it a nostalgic reminder for many of that era.
Neutral: Commenters such as @MWebb and @Gonnawin1 express curiosity regarding specific aspects of the car, including the unique shifter setup and a potential video showcasing the car in motion. @cruisemissile raises practical questions about the car's running condition, specifically asking about its ability to operate at high speeds and the status of fluids, indicating that these details are important for potential buyers. @Cchowning95 responds to these queries, confirming that while she has only driven it around her complex, the car starts easily and is planned to be in running condition before buyer pick-up.
Negative: Some comments bring up concerns regarding the car's condition after being stored for a long period. @formuladan humorously questions the headliner and mentions the need for a proper assessment before purchase. Additionally, @Cchowning95 shares her experience of facing an issue with the fuel pump after taking it for a drive, leading to doubts about reliability and raising concerns about its operational state after long-term sitting. This supports tension in the comments as some potential buyers may feel apprehensive about the actual driving condition of a car that hasn’t been used on the road for decades.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @million206, the seller, has assured potential buyers that they will replace the windshield before the sale, addressing concerns from previous commentators about the cost involved. @nathanp.alpine noted that the car shows exceptionally well for its age and mileage, highlighting that it underwent a full paint correction. Many comments are appreciative of the seller's proactive communication and willingness to assist with any additional questions or concerns about the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @rbw411 and @buzzbox, raised valid questions about the car's condition, such as the state of the rotors, the sagging headliner, and the type of windshield being replaced. @nathanp.alpine followed up on the original wheels and inquired about the accident history, recognizing the potential impact of these factors on the car's value. @million206 responded promptly with detailed information about the aftermarket parts and the repairability of the headliner, showing transparency.
Negative: Concerns were expressed about the after-market modifications, including non-original grills and wheels, which may detract from the vehicle's resale value. @buzzbox highlighted that the presence of these features could make it harder to achieve a high sale price, especially for discerning buyers. @bertc commented on the driving videos, suggesting they sounded noisy and questioning the vehicle's interior quality, while @Rjpglobal brought up worries about the headliner sagging significantly, prompting discussions about repair costs.
Original-Owner 2004 Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet 6-Speed
WP0CA29904S652117
Lot 189382
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Usd97 calls the vehicle a beauty and congratulates the seller on the experience of owning it for 20 years. @acd683 mentions that it is ready to enjoy and wishes the seller good luck with the sale. @boaboyoz describes the Seal Gray Metallic 996.2 cabriolet as fantastic and beautifully built, while @NortonVandessel praises the presentation and appreciates the car's documentation regarding emissions compliance.
Neutral: @GeoDuder inquires about the functioning of the air conditioning and heating systems and requests a video showcasing the convertible top operations. @hitonio also requests videos of the car running and the top going up and down, thereby expressing interest in the vehicle's functionalities. The seller, @James8620, confirms that the heat and A/C work well and mentions that videos demonstrating these features will be provided soon, along with explanations about the service records belonging to the car.
Negative: @BlackH20 expresses concern about the lack of records from the last couple of years, while also complimenting the car. @James8620 (The Seller) responds that extensive service records will accompany the car, including evidence of significant maintenance performed, like the IMS bearing replacement and other needed repairs, while downplaying the relevance of regular oil changes over the past two decades.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is described as a "REAL beaut" with super clean conditions and low mileage. @PricklyPearAutoClub notes that it features a gorgeous color combination and has undergone maintenance including the replacement of the driver side front air strut, turbo coolant line o-rings, and an oil change. All four corners of the air suspension are reported to work beautifully with no sagging or fluid leaks. The seller emphasizes that the vehicle was well cared for throughout its life, with no odd smells or unusual wear, making it feel virtually brand new and an absolute dream on the road.
Neutral: @PricklyPearAutoClub mentions that they can arrange shipping for the buyer at a competitive price, which is more favorable than what is typically available. Buyers will have direct communication with the seller regarding shipping, eliminating the need to deal with brokers who may not have a vested interest in the vehicle's sale. This service can add convenience to the purchasing experience, though it is a standard offer from many sellers.
Negative: There are no negative comments highlighted in the comments about the vehicle from @PricklyPearAutoClub. The seller's tone is positive and no criticisms or concerns about the vehicle's conditions or features are mentioned in their remarks.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @austin_alfa expresses his admiration for the W211 chassis, indicating it has been his favorite daily driver among many cars he's owned. He appreciates the balance of modern features without overly complicated electronics, noting that Mercedes-Benz resolved prior issues before introducing the W211. He mentions that the car seems like a nice one with low mileage, suggesting proper maintenance will lead to many years of service.
Neutral: @PricklyPearAutoClub (The Seller) introduces the vehicle as a stunning W211 E350, highlighting its super clean condition, low mileage, and classic Mercedes-Benz aesthetics. The seller finds it an exceptional vehicle among their inventory and conveys a sense of attachment to it, stating that it may be difficult to find another in such pristine condition. They also mention the option for arranged shipping, ensuring direct communication regarding logistics.
Negative: Some potential buyers, like @Crazylumpy325 and @nwestn365, raise concerns about the vehicle’s condition, specifically regarding dash lights and potential damage seen in photos. Despite the seller's assurance that there are no warning lights and the car drives well, questions regarding the extent of the visible damage and its implications remain. @Trenda suggests that a detailed inspection of the affected area is necessary to understand the extent of the damage, proposing that it may involve more than just minor cosmetic issues.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Mouse51 remarked on the bike's aesthetic by stating it's a nice looking Cub and praised the effort put into its makeover, suggesting that it looks better in its original work attire. This shows an appreciation for the craftsmanship involved. @adbuch noted the cleanliness of the build, stating that while it's not to factory specifications, it reflects a good level of care and effort, indicating a positive view of the overall condition of the motorcycle. @bringatrailer acknowledged @Triumphguy1968's observations and confirmed that the listing has been updated, signaling responsiveness to feedback and a commitment to transparency in the sale process.
Neutral: @adbuch mentioned the functional similarities between the T20SM and T20M models, explaining the distinction mainly lies in the type of stand each model has, providing factual insights about the motorcycle's design. This comment helps potential buyers understand the technical aspects of the vehicle without expressing a strong opinion. Additionally, @Mouse51 inquired about the compatibility of a more correct seat cover with the current seat, indicating a practical concern that relates to the motorcycle's restoration or customization without expressing a definitive stance.
Negative: @Triumphguy1968 pointed out specific discrepancies, noting that the motorcycle features a different type of chain guard and a later style of square barrel, critiquing the restoration for not adhering to original specifications. He expressed a wish that the bike could have been restored more authentically and implied that its current state might detract from its value as a collectible. Also, @2hecknback expressed skepticism about the appropriateness of turning a Mountain Cub into a custom show bike, suggesting that such modifications may not align with the intended use or heritage of the model.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TommyBruin comments on the striking color of the vehicle, noting its appeal. @MoneyPitter appreciates the 'deluxe interior' and admires the car's overall aesthetic and condition, suggesting it has been well cared for. @GotClutch reminisces about memories associated with the car, indicating its potential as a daily driver. @z-man expresses a nostalgic desire for the 67 S-code, having settled for a different model in his youth, while @Longmire45 exclaims about the car's beauty. Overall, many commenters highlight the car's attractive features and restoration quality, indicating a strong enthusiasm for the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments reflect curiosity and requests for more details, particularly about the vehicle's restoration, panel alignments, and other technical aspects. @JRPJR and @kurts1967 inquire about what specific body panels have been repaired or replaced, showing an interest in the car's history. @Haulgas expresses a wish for a driving video to provide insight into its functioning, while @D-S67 notes the difficulty of assessing panel gaps from the provided photos. Commenters also discuss differences in parts like air cleaners, showing technical interest in the specifics of the model and restoration details, indicating that their interest is rooted in both aesthetic and mechanical considerations.
Negative: Some commenters express dissatisfaction with the seller's lack of involvement and engagement. @linderpat criticizes the seller for limited photos and interaction, likening the listing to a basic eBay advertisement. @TommyBruin also highlights the issue of the car being listed elsewhere simultaneously, suggesting that the seller may be prioritizing another platform over BaT. @DKeng notes that provided links were no longer functional, contributing to a sense of frustration regarding transparency and accessibility. Overall, there is a sentiment that the seller’s approach could undermine the interest in the vehicle, potentially leading to below-expected bids.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors express a generally favorable view of the vehicle. @bat appreciates the 5-speed automatic transmission, while @windnsea00 finds the truck to be a good example of a basic pickup with guts. @Shaank94, the seller, proudly mentions the truck’s low mileage and reveals it runs and drives amazingly well, with plenty of power. @TXRancher specifically likes the current wheels and tires, showing enthusiasm for the truck's overall look. Additionally, @Shaank94 provides reassurance about the vehicle's condition, stating it functions as it should and suggesting confidence in its reliability.
Neutral: Several comments focus on technical aspects and minor concerns regarding the vehicle. @henryr highlights a potential issue with the later wheels, raising questions about offsets and spacers. @Mongoose55 asks for clarification on the extent of any rubbing issues between the tires and the frame, and @baconB queries about the front end's coil spring setup, uncertain if it was factory installed. @Shaank94 addresses these inquiries, mentioning plans to source stock wheels and spacers for the winning bidder, and reassures bidders about the truck's functionality. The seller also confirms the bed length as 8 feet, an important detail for potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the mostly positive reception, there are concerns among some commentors. @baconB's comment suggests uncertainty about the modifications made to the truck and raises questions about the front end, implying a lack of factory originality. @Mongoose55's inquiry regarding the wheel rubbing hints at potential issues that could affect the truck's performance. @Shaank94 acknowledges the rubs at full lock, which could deter buyers looking for a vehicle without complications. There's speculation around the vehicle's past, with @Mongoose55 noting it was in rough shape from a government auction, indicating it might require additional investment for full restoration.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @P48ker (The Seller) acknowledges and appreciates the positive feedback from @BillHoar about the bike and confirms that he has worked on the front brake to ensure it functions well. The bike is praised for its capabilities, reflecting a generally favorable view from users who recognize its value despite some minor issues.
Neutral: @HondaEnthusiast78 inquires about the location of the bike, which is clarified by @P48ker (The Seller) as being in Grosse Pointe Park, Michigan. @Giu62 shows interest in the specifics of the front disc brake, prompting a conversation about its manufacturer, indicating that there is some curiosity about the bike's components without any strong opinions expressed.
Negative: @BillHoar points out a concern regarding the front disc brake, suggesting it was poorly designed possibly for marketing reasons, and notes that the bike may be missing a right-hand mirror. While these comments express dissatisfaction with some aspects of the bike, @P48ker (The Seller) attempts to mitigate concerns by explaining the repairs made, indirectly acknowledging the bike's shortcomings.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz described the vehicle as a 'rockstar red El Camino' and praised its tremendous build, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @a410traveler commented on the terrific combination of classic style and drivability updates, indicating a favorable perception of the vehicle's design and functionality. @tciotti2003 expressed love for the El Camino's build quality, while various comments from @wyatt1948 (The Seller) emphasized their commitment to providing updates and showcasing the truck's positive attributes, highlighting its excellent running condition and enjoyable driving experience.
Neutral: @bills55 pointed out a potential inconsistency in the vehicle's description regarding the transmission and requested clarification. @tciotti2003 inquired about additional features, such as a garage door opener and any non-functional components, to which @wyatt1948 (The Seller) responded affirmatively, ensuring that everything works well. Questions about the vehicle's location and metal originality were also raised by @DSUdden, leading to relevant responses from the seller about constraints on road testing due to weather conditions and uncertainty about the metal.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @MichaelUSA regarding the engine's specifications, questioning its authenticity based on an oil port plug's presence, which could imply a discrepancy in the engine's age. This query underscores doubts about whether the engine truly aligns with the claimed model year. @Cgebhart sought clarification on a $150 charge mentioned by the seller, which could suggest a lack of transparency about additional fees associated with the purchase.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express positive sentiments about the vehicle, noting its unique features and the seller's transparency. @xDLXSFx appreciates the rarity of the folding rear seats and rear sunshades, describing them as a 'flex.' @jdoubleu reinforces this positivity by confirming the existence of a military sales program for the BMW in South Korea, which adds credibility to the vehicle's history. Additionally, @wahid2003 (The Seller) shares that they maintained a good relationship with their BMW dealer and ensured proper servicing of the car, which includes regular fluid changes and modifications such as LED headlight bulbs. These details contribute to an overall positive impression of the car's condition and its past.
Neutral: A few comments focus on obtaining more information regarding the vehicle's service history. @fauxtool inquires about the 17-year gap in the CarFax report, expecting documentation from the seller, while @Bill_Clay points out that CarFax reports are not always fully reliable or complete. @wahid2003 (The Seller) attempts to address these concerns by sharing their communication with BMW, stating that the gap is due to the vehicle being stationed in South Korea with an Army General. @wahid2003 (The Seller) further offers to provide Korean documentation to back the vehicle's service, which might not satisfy every potential buyer but displays a commitment to transparency.
Negative: Some comments reveal skepticism and concern regarding the vehicle's history. @fauxtool seems doubtful of the seller's explanation for the CarFax gap, asserting that they would prefer verifiable documentation instead of a narrative from the seller. Furthermore, although @Trenda expresses interest in seeing a driving video to understand how the car rides, the need for such validation indicates a lack of confidence in the seller's claims. Overall, there are hints of distrust among some commenters who question the authenticity of the seller's claims about the vehicle's past.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the car's aesthetics, highlighting its stunning looks and tasteful upgrades. @BubbaGPZ1100 referred to it as a gorgeous car, with personal touches that resonate emotionally with potential buyers. @georgepehanick praised the body-colored wheels with poverty caps, considering them a great sleeper look. @AlexPHabrich echoed this positivity with a simple, "Beautiful Firebird – Love everything about it!" Additionally, @Mike_Breinin noted their initial hesitation regarding the convertible style but ultimately found the car appealing after hearing its engine and exhaust sound in a video, calling it a real gem of a first-generation Firebird.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Thestig59 and @FirebirdHank, inquired about performance figures and historical details concerning the car's original specifications, showing a genuine interest in its performance capacities. @BillKesner brought up potential concerns about the car's sound, suggesting a possible front exhaust leak, which landed in a neutral zone as it raised a question but didn’t deliver a direct criticism. @JB455 shared insights about the car's color, noting that Limelight Green was popular in 1969 but became less favorable over time, which may impact perceptions of the car's desirability among collectors.
Negative: Some comments touched on potential concerns about the vehicle, as raised by @BillKesner who speculated an exhaust leak that could suggest underlying issues. @FirebirdHank noted the importance of mentioning the car's original engine setup in the auction description to avoid misleading bidders. @David_P asked about the steering wheel, implying possible non-original modifications that could detract from the car's authenticity. @ChiliJR and @pdxgasman also showed questions regarding the trim tag and functionality of the gauges, respectively, which, while inquiries, could indicate apprehensions about the vehicle's authenticity and operational condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed high praise for the vehicle, with @john_chamorro calling it a "Nice Fummins!" and @fordcrewcaba stating they would "daily drive this!!" @GotClutch appreciates the contrast between the aged exterior and the refreshed interior, calling it a "Cool drivetrain," while @BaerBronco admires the build, referencing that they have watched the YouTube videos about it. @boaboyoz also calls it an "awesome" modified F-250 Ranger, noting its amazing build and wishing good luck on the auction.
Neutral: Some comments were informational or inquisitive rather than strictly positive or negative. @timothydavidjohnson posed a question regarding the choice of wheel backspacing, while @TaylorGuy provided additional information about the axles being three inches wider than a factory model. @bh867 inquired about the originality of the exterior paint, indicating a desire for confirmation about the vehicle's authenticity and build details.
Negative: There were concerns raised by @hitower3 regarding potential mechanical issues, specifically asking if there were fixes made for oil leaks, ac leaks, and an incorrectly reading fuel gauge. @BlackSheep18, the seller, addressed these concerns by confirming that the oil leak and fuel gauge issues have been resolved, though such inquiries may signal lingering apprehensions about the truck's reliability among potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle in question is a 2002 Ford Thunderbird featuring only 28K original miles, highlighting its status as a standout example of luxury American engineering. According to @Rarecars (The Seller), it is accident-free, rust-free, and a non-smoker car, having been dealer-serviced and recently prepared for sale. The seller emphasizes that the car is in outstanding condition inside and out, providing detailed images and videos for potential buyers to examine its quality, including any minor flaws, which builds trust and confidence in the auction process.
Neutral: Commenters posed inquiries regarding specific details about the vehicle, reflecting both curiosity and concern. @Bartrix raised a question about the date code on the tires, to which @donroger1 responded with information about the tire codes. Similarly, @WAC545 asked about the availability of the factory boot, and @rapiderobert1 confirmed the car is registered in California. Additionally, @Pooder pointed out cosmetic issues noted in the photos, seeking further clarification on any existing blemishes or noises detected during driving.
Negative: On the downside, there were concerns raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly by @Pooder who mentioned visible dents and inquired about noise when driving, casting doubt on the vehicle's overall state despite assurances of its care. @esmass57 expressed disappointment over the lack of pictures of the ragtop, which could indicate potential hesitance from buyers regarding unseen flaws. Furthermore, questions about missing factory components and details about blemishes suggest a level of skepticism among potential bidders.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express a positive sentiment towards the 2001 Subaru Outback Wagon, highlighting its reliability and suitability as a great starter vehicle. @CRUSH noted it as an ideal choice for someone in need of a dependable daily driver. The vehicle was praised for its rugged styling and versatility, with @StyleCars emphasizing its go-anywhere spirit and spacious interior, making it perfect for both adventures and everyday use.
Neutral: The comments also include some neutral inquiries about the vehicle's condition and history. @twobitebrownies questioned why the vehicle was back on the market so soon, to which @StyleCars clarified that it was due to the previous winning bidder's inability to take possession. Other inquiries came from @Mac44 and @Terry2o2, asking about maintenance aspects like head gasket replacements and the timing belt status, with @StyleCars providing thorough responses. Several potential buyers expressed concerns about the title and transmission condition, indicating a need for more detailed information.
Negative: There are some negative sentiments related to the title status and potential concerns for long-distance buyers. @millstoneman raised questions about the drivetrain and any fluid leaks, expressing worries over the inspection process for someone purchasing from afar. Similarly, @BZac highlighted red flags regarding the title transfer process, showing concern over the bureaucratic hurdles involved when dealing with DMVs. These comments reflect apprehensions about the purchasing process and the vehicle’s condition despite reassurances from the seller.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Overall, the comments highlight the vehicle's upgrades and maintenance history which are viewed positively, particularly by @genevamotorcars (The Seller). They emphasize that the seller invested significantly in repairs to ensure the vehicle performs in optimal condition, showcasing a commitment to quality. @Hurst63 also praises the vehicle's off-road capability and ride quality, noting that larger sidewalls improve comfort in various conditions, particularly in snow. This suggests that the vehicle is well-suited for diverse terrain, which can be an attractive feature for potential buyers.
Neutral: There are discussions regarding the vehicle's specifications and history, with various contributors such as @Oregondave and @BigBearJoe sharing insights about wheel sizes and driving experience. @Oregondave mentions the difference between the 18" and 21" wheels, while @mikelaca is curious about their comparative performance. The vendor clarifies that the vehicle was maintained with an open checkbook, which lends a sense of reliability. However, there's some curiosity around the timing of the sale and the previous owner's decisions, which leaves the situation somewhat ambiguous.
Negative: Conversely, there are concerns raised about the vehicle's maintenance issues, primarily around the turbo system, as indicated by @Oregondave who mentions that oil leaks are common. @SGTPrepper inquires about potential oil analysis, hinting at apprehensions regarding the car's longevity. Additionally, @Wildcat1 questions why such extensive repairs were made only to sell the vehicle shortly thereafter, suggesting potential red flags about the car's reliability and the owner's intentions. This indicates some skepticism in the community concerning the vehicle's condition despite the positive maintenance comments.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @brokeidiot mentioned the bike's good looks, indicating a strong aesthetic appeal. @Gs82 praised the build as awesome, reinforcing its visual and mechanical quality. @carlust33 commented on the nice platform and suggested the addition of original touches, showing appreciation for the custom work without detracting from its charm. @BOWSERBOY1950 called the bike great-looking and extended wishes for a successful sale, highlighting a generally favorable reception among enthusiasts. @Anton2024 complimented the seller on their detailed efforts and the bike's reliable engine, noting its bulletproof nature and overall execution, further emphasizing the thoroughness of the build.
Neutral: Several comments raised questions about specific components and setups, such as @MountainRoadBiker inquiring about the handlebar mounts and wheel fitment modifications. @daviduccio asked the seller about the idle adjustment and the speedometer's functionality, indicating an interest in the bike's operational aspects. Meanwhile, @JT77 highlighted considerations regarding customs and shipping, which are practical concerns for potential buyers. Additionally, @Pmbeadle (The Seller) addressed various inquiries, sharing technical details about the bike's components, indicating a willingness to engage with the community and provide relevant information.
Negative: There were a few comments expressing skepticism; @Theoneracer questioned the choice of customizing a Sandcast 1969 Honda, suggesting a preference for preserving vintage models. @Ronchristie pointed out what appeared to be a subpar weld on the frame, although he acknowledged that such weld quality was common in early Honda models, which might deter some buyers. @preez77 humorously noted that the weld quality was about average for the period, indicating that flaws are to be expected. These perceptions suggest that while the bike has many supporters, some aspects have elicited criticism or concern about the quality of modifications.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220SE Coupe, highlighting its exceptional restoration and beautiful aesthetics. @Dollycat3 remarks on the lovely classic color combination and gorgeous interior, while @GDogg calls it probably the nicest 220SE Coupe he has seen, appreciating the care it received over the years. @whipcity76 complements its fun appearance and methodical restoration, envisioning it as a charming vehicle for cruising scenic locations. Additionally, @UncleFred1 praises the quality of the restoration, noting that it reflects a true labor of love and calling it one of the most huggable cars.
Neutral: The seller, @vintagelegance, engages with potential buyers and provides information about the vehicle, emphasizing its artistic value and the skills of its restorer, Mr. Holley. They also update the community about past inspections and modifications made for performance improvements, such as adding a winter cold start injector. @hamid-k50 humorously inquires about whether the house is for sale, while @190280560SL asks technical questions about the vehicle’s features and upgrades, demonstrating interest in its specifications and rarity.
Negative: Some comments bring attention to minor concerns regarding the vehicle's restoration and parts. For instance, @Frank_Barrett notes certain discrepancies with the lenses and specifications typical for U.S. models, while @BBob points out the use of vinyl instead of leather for the interior. @UncleFred1 suggests possible improvements such as replacing the front windshield and rubber gasket or upgrading to broad white wall tires, though he acknowledges the vehicle's overall impressive condition. There is a sense that while the vehicle is remarkable, there are still areas where it could be further enhanced to reach its full potential.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GotClutch expressed admiration for the Ford S197 design, calling it a perfect blend of retro and modern aesthetics, which makes the Shelby GT500 particularly beautiful. @linderpat appreciated the unaltered condition of the GT500, noting its potential as a track car after some modifications. @Rodlano (The Seller) shared his deep affection for the Mustang despite his limited mileage due to age-related health issues, emphasizing the car's pristine condition and its bright red color. He assured potential buyers that the car would only require polishing and personalization.
Neutral: @FoxGTFan inquired about the stock status of the powertrain, asking for specifics on tunes and original mufflers. @F117 engaged @linderpat, seeking clarification on the transmission's performance in relation to the GT500, highlighting the experience with the transmission noise and shifting precision, which @linderpat elaborated on by sharing his positive impressions of the car's performance despite the noise. @68OrangeCrate pointed out that the transmission noise is acknowledged in the owner's manual as normal, signifying a typical experience for owners of these older models.
Negative: @linderpat mentioned that the transmission was noisy, often compared to a bucket of bolts, which could deter some potential buyers despite his overall satisfaction with the vehicle. @FasterFranky indicated that while he experienced no noise in his own 2007 GT500, the lack of refinement in the Tremec TR-6060 compared to newer models like the GT350R is worth noting. @RHG357 shared a negative opinion on the stock shifter, criticizing the excessive spring pressure, although he acknowledged enjoying the performance and handling of these cars, highlighting potential issues with the transmission experience.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the well-maintained condition of the vehicle, with @mikemahalo noting it is a 'beautiful and well-kept car' and praising the extensive service records for the 74+ vehicles. @kriskrispy also expresses enthusiasm, asking if there are plans to add cold start and driving videos, indicating a strong interest in the vehicle. Additionally, @HBW1020 mentions having owned many similar vehicles and considers this one a good example, pointing out that it seems to be in a better condition than many others typically seen.
Neutral: The comments reflect a mix of informative exchanges and requests for more information, with @whacker1972 inquiring if all gauges and power components work properly, to which @Keysy (The Seller) confirms that everything works fine and there are no leaks. @gauldingr and @CalBoiler request close-up photos of reported damage, and @Keysy (The Seller) responds by providing the requested images and clarifying the details about imperfections like the bumper scratch and the tail light crack, which is minor and not easily noticeable. There’s a general atmosphere of community interaction among potential buyers and the seller.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the vehicle's condition, with @gauldingr pointing out visible damage in specific photos and seeking clarification about the issues in photos 44 & 45. While @CalBoiler mentions being unable to determine certain damages from provided images, these inquiries suggest potential buyers are cautious and want to ensure transparency with the vehicle's overall presentation. @79skyjock questions the meaning of 'button' looking things on the headliner, indicating curiosity and perhaps some confusion regarding the vehicle's features.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ThinksHesFast describes the vehicle as the Holy Grail of modern Porsches, indicating it is a very special car. The aesthetics and features like the painted side skirts and gloss black rear diffuser have received positive remarks from several users, including @onehussler who admires the car's lines and stance, and @cryptical1200 who appreciates the tasteful additions. Many commenters express that this 991.1 GTS coupe is not only a beautiful car but also a remarkable investment, particularly noting its rarity and the desirability of the manual transmission variant.
Neutral: @Lovethatnewcarsmell (The Seller) answers various inquiries about the car, providing details about its coolant leak repair and confirming the repair didn’t require pulling the engine. There's a dialogue about the auction process, with @TchnoZ33 seeking information on how payments work for bids. The seller emphasizes their excitement about the vehicle and its special features, confirming that the vehicle has not been tracked or performed autocross and replies to questions regarding the CARFAX and DME status, showing an active engagement with potential buyers.
Negative: Some commenters raise questions that hint at concerns, such as @richbob asking why the car is being sold, to which @Lovethatnewcarsmell (The Seller) responds about making room for a different model. Additionally, @pattera3's inquiry about the DME is seen as a significant concern in the context of buying manual cars, and the pressure on the seller to provide this information reflects hesitations in the buyer community. The mixed feelings around repairs, such as the coolant leak, also suggest a cautious approach from potential buyers, with @Roadstar08 seeking clarifications about the repair process.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TheStressless1 praises the vehicle, noting his positive experience with a similar model regarding fuel efficiency and snow performance. He believes the Cayenne is a reliable vehicle, especially after taking care of the transfer case. @GotClutch highlights the desirability of the manual version of the Cayenne, calling it a perfect daily driver, while also appreciating its aesthetic appeal. @8000rpm shares their enthusiasm, mentioning extensive maintenance and upgrades done to the car, making it a desirable option for potential buyers.
Neutral: @Prabz32 requests additional content by asking for walkaround and driving videos to better assess the vehicle. @sidud expresses interest in hearing the exhaust sound, specifically requesting video footage of a cold start and drive-by. @porsche90210 inquires about practical features such as a backup camera and heated seats, seeking clarification on their availability, which indicates a practical approach to evaluating the vehicle.
Negative: Some concerns revolve around the lack of detailed history of prior maintenance, such as the absence of receipts for major repairs noted by @8000rpm. Additionally, @porsche90210 points out what appears to be a lack of heated seats in the car, which could be a drawback for some potential buyers. @8000rpm mentions minor imperfections in the paint and wear, like road chips on the hood, that are to be expected in a vehicle of this age, suggesting that while the car is overall well-maintained, it might not be in pristine condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its stunning restoration and thoughtful modifications. @jimmytheirishman highlighted the beauty of the modded Jaguar E-Type, expressing envy for the owner who took it on a cross-country trip. @Dollycat3 and @baur2002 echoed this admiration, describing it as absolutely stunning and excellently crafted, with @ACDarata calling it a lovely work of art. @Fuelieguy shared a personal story regarding his admiration for the car, emphasizing the impressive work and driveability post-restoration. Overall, the vehicle is celebrated for its aesthetic appeal and high-quality craftsmanship, which has attracted a lot of positive attention.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the vehicle's features without clear bias. For instance, @DesertDex raised a question about the title year, and @Scliffe noted the interesting modifications with curiosity about how bidding might progress. @Tudor54 (The Seller) provided details about the car's construction and readiness for its next owner, also inviting prospective buyers to inspection in Miami and reassuring that the car drives superbly. Additionally, @jmscalpel clarified technical aspects like the coil spring modification and the AC system, indicating it functions well but with limitations in extreme temperatures.
Negative: There were some criticisms concerning specific modifications and past incidents experienced by the vehicle. @Nimmer questioned the choice of the late 3.8 dash, while @jgtnor expressed doubt about the modifications, voicing that sometimes it’s best to leave a masterpiece untouched. @porkpiehat resonated with this sentiment, stating that modifications that may look great on other vehicles fell flat on the E-Type. Concerns were also raised about the effectiveness of the air conditioning system, with @davidxk noting past issues related to its functionality during extreme heat, reflecting on the complexity and potential drawbacks of such modifications.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @tgperformance (The Seller) expressed excitement about listing the 2010 BMW X5 xDrive30i at no reserve and encouraged potential bidders to reach out with questions or comments, fostering a welcoming atmosphere for prospective buyers. They promptly responded to inquiries, showing attentiveness to the community by confirming that driving videos would be posted soon and even sharing some cold start footage to pique interest.
Neutral: The conversation included inquiries from several users, such as @knotthead asking for driving videos and @Fisherman2027 seeking detailed maintenance information about oil leaks, major engine work, and other specific aspects of the vehicle's condition. @tgperformance (The Seller) addressed these queries, mentioning that various repairs were made in preparation for the sale, though they lacked complete maintenance records from previous ownership, which may leave some aspects of the car's history unclear.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the accuracy of a road test associated with the E70 X5 model, with @PM3 criticizing misinformation about the vehicle's engine and generation. This led to @bringatrailer acknowledging the mistake and removing the incorrect information from the listing. Potential buyers like @Fisherman2027 expressed anxiety about undisclosed issues, including the water pump and thermostat status, indicating some skepticism about the vehicle's overall condition.
|
|