Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 1992 Porsche 911 Targa Singer, especially its striking design and unique color combination. @Seaate20 noted that it could be the most expensive Porsche with over 200k miles, calling the car 'dang good lookin'.' @devitron described it in vivid terms, calling it 'ooey gooey delicious!' While @HEman referred to it as 'jaw dropping beauty' and praised the rear wheel flare as possibly the 'sexiest design element in Porsche history.' The overall sentiment reflects a strong appreciation for the car's aesthetic and craftsmanship, with @AgWagon stating that it 'checks all the boxes' and may be their favorite.
Neutral: Some comments focused on the logistics of purchasing and exporting the vehicle, with @Reserve416 (The Seller) providing important details about duties and tariffs. Commenters like @911r discussed the implications of Canadian car importation fees, confirming the car is exempt from a significant tariff. Several users exchanged questions regarding registration and shipping, suggesting they recognized the car's value but were concerned about the complexities involved in acquiring it. Overall, there was a blend of admiration and practical inquiries, highlighting both the car's allure and the realistic aspects of ownership.
Negative: On the flip side, a few comments expressed concerns about specific features of the car. @MrBeverlyhills was blunt, stating, 'UGH, that interior' which signifies a strong dislike for the interior design. @BloodyHell humorously cautioned against eating anything in the interior, implying that it could easily get messy, while @Cornbread suggested that the car 'needs to find its voice' by being driven, which hints at the car being overly preserved rather than actively enjoyed. Overall, while these negative remarks are less common, they highlight that not every design choice is universally appreciated.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and design. @AD15 described it as a "beautiful car" and @theforce88 echoed that sentiment by wishing the seller "good luck". @IIIMK, the original owner, reminisced about purchasing the car and mentioned that it has maintained its great appearance over the years. @lunchbocks2002 noted the well-preserved interior and emphasized the importance of showcasing the car's color better, discussing the potential impact of lighting on its presentation. Overall, there was a strong appreciation for the car's aesthetics and history, with commenters complimenting its gorgeous appearance, especially as a final edition.
Neutral: The conversation included several questions about the vehicle's specifications and sale conditions, focusing on logistics and import details. @Supermanx68 inquired about safety certification for Ontario buyers, while @Oldcarguy1957 raised a question about the title, which the seller clarified is based on registration due to provincial regulations. @autosportclassic, the seller, provided thorough responses, confirming the vehicle incurs zero tariffs and duties as a US-made car. They also explained the import fees necessary for bringing the vehicle into the USA, ensuring potential buyers had all the required information about ownership and documentation.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the car's condition, particularly regarding a potential crack in the control arm which @ForrestKass2005 noted from an image. The seller, @autosportclassic, addressed this by clarifying it was a manufacturing defect rather than an actual crack. Additionally, there was an issue with the original parts, as the seller mentioned that while they initially planned to include the original shifter and intake tubes, they have since been unable to locate them, causing some disappointment among potential bidders. Commenters also questioned the absence of the OEM VHS tape from the vehicle, which was confirmed as no longer available, adding to some trepidation around the completeness of the car's original components.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is being highlighted positively as a desirable classic, specifically the 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL500 with only 13,000 miles. @Collectibleclassics emphasized their dedication to customer satisfaction and transparency, boasting impressive Google reviews and promoting their expertise as a high-volume car dealer. Commenters like @wonglf appreciated the value of classic Mercs, noting the vehicle's luxury status and affordability in comparison to new cars.
Neutral: Several comments sought further information about the vehicle's condition and history. @Salgado911 and @RHG357 inquired about ownership details and confirmed that it is not a 4Matic model. @jaynan noted only one key was included and asked if there were two keys available, to which @Collectibleclassics confirmed no second key was provided. The seller also communicated their readiness to assist potential buyers before the auction's end, inviting them to inquire about trade-ins and other services.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the potential costs associated with maintaining a high-end vehicle such as this Mercedes. @jackhild shared experiences of expensive repairs and the risks associated with buying a used luxury car, emphasizing that lower mileage doesn't guarantee fewer issues. @wonglf expressed caution about dealing with the upkeep costs, reminiscing about his own experiences with previous models and the hefty bills that accompanied maintenance when trouble arose.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Ferrari 458's striking color combination, particularly highlighting the Blu Pozzi as stunning; @GDogg described it as 'Lovely color combination' while @Mason320 noted it as a 'real collector quality ride.' @tferrer called it potentially the best color combination he has ever seen on a 458, and @Featherlite shared a personal anecdote about driving this model, praising it as an example of Ferrari getting everything 'just right.' Commenters also appreciated its iconic design and sound, acknowledging its status as a joy to drive and a wise investment for the future.
Neutral: A few comments brought attention to practical aspects of the car and its history. @tim54575 (The Seller) shared insights about the car's condition, noting that while it had not been detailed extensively, it was regularly maintained and stored in good condition. Comments such as that from @dino70089 and @JL95 asked for further details about the vehicle's service history and condition, while @KPrendev1 mentioned common concerns about front axles. Overall, the discussions varied from general curiosity about the car's features to inquiries about specific maintenance details, reflecting a balanced perspective on its condition and value.
Negative: On the downside, some comments raised concerns regarding the car's maintenance and condition. @investgtr1 pointed out potential issues with the tires, suggesting they might need replacement due to low tread and dry rot. @bulletnozeguy expressed a preference for vehicles that are routinely maintained, implying that the 458's mileage and condition may not meet those high standards. Additionally, @JL95 raised questions about possible dents or imperfections in the bumper, indicating that some prospective buyers were looking for flawless examples, which may impact the perception of the car's overall value.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and craftsmanship, with @ButWhatDoIKnow noting its classic-like colors and @Al_Swearengen praising the attention to detail and effort put into the build. @boaboyoz describes the Bel Air as a delightful turquoise and white classic, while @Trifiveron congratulates the owner on a beautifully done car. @aggieranch appreciates the classy convertible seat upholstery. The enthusiasm for the car is evident, with @letthegypsyhaveit expressing a preference for this classic over any new Chevy.
Neutral: Several commenters have questions regarding the vehicle's specifications and maintenance history. @RMNEvents seeks clarification on the engine type, as there seems to be some confusion between a 350 and a 357 engine. @mike_rockwell and @DennisCejmer also pose questions about potential leaks and technical details like rear gear ratio and seat belt availability for the rear seat. The seller, @rodneyracer, has actively responded to these queries, providing thorough information including engine specifications and updates on repairs.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised regarding a leak, with @GLWTA and @mike_rockwell inquiring about an apparent transmission dipstick seal issue in one of the photos. @rodneyracer acknowledged this problem but reassured commenters that it has been resolved with replaced seals and tightening. Although the vehicle has a high level of interest, these queries indicate a level of scrutiny from potential buyers about its condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MilleMiglia expressed excitement upon seeing the vehicle referred to as the 'Yellow Jolly Beauty', suggesting a nostalgic appreciation for the car. @vwjollyfactory (The Seller) acknowledged the comment graciously and demonstrated perseverance in finding a new owner for the car. Additionally, the vehicle is street legal and primarily designed for city use, which aligns with its potential as an enjoyable vehicle for everyday coastal or urban driving, as further confirmed by @vwjollyfactory.
Neutral: @DloXpo inquired about any changes made since the vehicle's first listing, and @vwjollyfactory responded that there were no modifications to the car post-listing, emphasizing transparency and providing further clarification about an oil breather hose being out of place in an earlier photo. @Alan_k raised practical questions regarding the possible addition of a soft enclosure and the conditions for pickup after purchase, to which the seller provided thorough answers, indicating pricing and flexibility on the pickup timeframe.
Negative: @Hurstachelli's concern about the vehicle's capability for long-distance drives suggests some limitations in its design; it is not built for highway travel, which may disappoint potential buyers looking for a versatile vehicle. The overall discussion reflects some uncertainty regarding the vehicle's functionality beyond short trips, which may deter those anticipating longer use. Comments like @beko's about driving practicality reinforce that there may be concerns on whether it suits various driving conditions.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle, highlighting its appeal as a 'Lotus Super 7' style build. @Bear63 commented positively on the potential thrill of driving it on the track and was enticed to take it out for a spirited test drive. Another commenter, @spitfun, shared personal experience with similar cars, noting their excellent handling and performance, especially enjoying the thrill of high RPM shifting. Overall, there is a consensus among several enthusiasts that this vehicle could provide great fun and excitement, especially for those familiar with the MK Roadster platform.
Neutral: Some comments were more informational, asking about specific features and potential legalities regarding registration for road use. @obercom asked if the car had reverse, which @CarbonAtilier confirmed it does. Questions about seat dimensions, fit for tall drivers, and documentation details were also raised, with @Bear63 inquiring about the current owner's height and fit within the vehicle. Additionally, topics concerning the vehicle's weight and import paperwork were discussed, providing a balanced look at what prospective buyers might need to consider.
Negative: Conversely, there were several concerns raised about the vehicle's history and condition. @Skidzzz cautioned about possible rust issues on the frame and advised investigating the car's track history. Comments also mentioned difficulties with registration, especially concerning the lack of a certificate of origin, which @dfree pointed out would impede legality in certain states. Other commenters noted uncertainty around the car's previous use and condition under its wrap, with specific inquiries about damage or maintenance history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous positive comments, especially regarding its condition and unique features. @m-tuner, the seller, emphasized the detailed rebuild process, mentioning that the vehicle is practically new with a host of new parts including an engine, transmission, drive shafts, and more. Commentors like @Jake4411 and @Classicgranola praised the vehicle for its rawness and amazing aesthetics, noting its impressive sound and appearance. The blue paint was also highlighted as a unique and appealing trait that many appreciate.
Neutral: Several comments focused on logistical details about the vehicle and its functionalities. @surgeonsp inquired about the removable roof cover and potential leaks, to which @m-tuner provided precise details regarding the modifications made for light entry and the sealing process. Additionally, @swampfox13 asked for video confirmations of the vehicle's operational capabilities, and @m-tuner reassured the potential buyers by confirming that videos and inspections by a mechanic are available, indicating a willingness to provide transparency about the vehicle's status.
Negative: There were no significant negative comments regarding the vehicle; most feedback was constructive or neutral, focusing on inquiries or minor concerns. The feedback generally leaned positive toward the physical aspects and rebuild quality, with no glaring issues or criticisms raised by commentors regarding the vehicle's performance or condition. @surgeonsp's question about the roof cover could indicate a concern, but it was addressed without any indication of a serious defect, maintaining an overall favorable perception.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Pathfinder1806 expressed excitement over the vehicle with comments like "Holy hood scoop!!!" and praised the color combination, wishing the seller luck with the auction. Many commenters like @hudd07 shared their enthusiasm for the car, mentioning it was their dream car growing up. @That67CamaroGuy highlighted the car's performance, calling it a "blast to drive" with both raw power and respectable street manners, aiming to provide joy to the new owner.
Neutral: @That67CamaroGuy explained the reasons behind the sale, citing personal circumstances such as raising young children and the financial burdens that come with it. He provided details about the car's hoods, explaining the differences between the 4" steel cowl hood currently on it and the 3" fiberglass hood available for sale. He reassured potential buyers about visibility concerns with the hood scoop, stating he can see perfectly, but advising that others could swap hoods as needed.
Negative: @Notgonnagiveit raised concerns about visibility with the hood scoop and the challenges of getting a clear view while driving. Additionally, there were discussions about the car’s engine installation and condition, with @toomanycars404 inquiring about the motor's miles. @jigoe007 questioned the common practice of keeping one's foot on the clutch pedal, highlighting concerns around traditional driving habits that some may find outdated.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @colganteam expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, simply stating, "Man that’s nice!!!" @Dollycat3 added that the Wagoneer is "beautiful" with a fantastic color combination. @gb70 confirmed their appreciation by saying, "Real nice!"
Neutral: The seller, @poloplayer3, provided a welcoming introduction about the 1986 Jeep Grand Wagoneer, emphasizing its classic status and well-maintained condition in response to bids placed. The seller assured potential buyers that the SUV exudes charm and reliability, inviting questions during the auction process. Regarding functional aspects, @poloplayer3 confirmed that the A/C blows cold, all windows are operational, and they provided insights on driving the vehicle across the country.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @JWB89, who inquired about potential paint issues visible in pictures of the rocker panels, suggesting there were paint runs or mismatched coatings. @stephenMS sought clarity on the air conditioning's functionality, and @DiabloSV12 questioned the vehicle's registration status in California, indicating uncertainty about vintage car laws. @Kronix mistakenly assumed the Jeep was located in Colorado, which suggests possible logistical confusion for interested bidders.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and overall build quality. @kink56 praised its muscle car appeal, noting its real muscle with A/C, while @BUQUICK emphasized the accuracy of the brake system in the listing. @BradleyW88 called the car beautiful, and @Bigpig455 highlighted its clean appearance and good options. Commenters like @PDXBryan remarked on the performance-to-price ratio of the GS models, reinforcing their status as collectible cars. Comments from @JaneVal53 and @racer417 appreciated the vehicle's restoration quality and historical significance, bringing additional positive attention to this classic car.
Neutral: A number of individuals have sought clarification on the vehicle’s specifications and authenticity. @Coog54 requested confirmation of the block stamp and numbers matching status, while @Imright pointed out the need for details about the car's original engine and transmission, engaging in discussions about the car's specifications. @JosCherry suggested including a driving video to aid potential buyers. The seller, @Jeffh71, provided responses about the car's status, including details on the A/C system and paint condition, which some found informative but also raised further questions about the level of matching parts and restorations, indicating an active exchange of information.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the authenticity of certain components of the vehicle. @kink56 critiqued the assumptions surrounding the carburetor's matching status, suggesting the criteria for a correct restoration were not clearly met. Additionally, there were comments questioning the originality of the transmission, as noted by @JosCherry. @cjanin200 sought clarity on lacquer checking, emphasizing the potential downsides of hidden imperfections despite the vehicle's overall appealing presentation. Such remarks suggested a lack of confidence in the completeness of the seller's claims, leading to skepticism from some community members.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed appreciation for the truck's aesthetic appeal, labeling it a 'pretty good looking rig' and a 'nice looking truck'. The added video of the engine running was also mentioned positively by some users, as it provided additional information that could help in assessing the vehicle. Overall, there’s a sense of intrigue and interest in the truck's appearance based on the comments reviewed.
Neutral: Commenters primarily focused on the need for more specific information, particularly regarding the engine's specifications and the VIN replacement. @Tituswolf351 highlighted various possibilities about the truck's components and their original configurations, while others like @Bdogz69 questioned if the parts were consistent with the model year. The seller, @taylormcvay, responded to inquiries by sharing insights on their knowledge and previous ownership experiences, emphasizing that they were not an expert on the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns about the truck's engine and historical accuracy were prevalent in the comments. @Jakerdog and @broyal pointed out the need for further specifics regarding the V8 engine's type. There were also doubts expressed about the authenticity of the vehicle's parts and configuration, with some commenters indicating a possible mismatch in the years and parts used. @sniktau and @CDehne pointed out discrepancies in the truck's model year and engine expectations, suggesting that the current setup might not be original.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight the charming aesthetic of the 1974 MGB Roadster, with many users expressing affection for its classic design. @Tom_S notes the vehicle's OEM steering wheel and emphasizes that the car serves as a fantastic project for the next owner, fostering a bonding experience. @thunderbirdsnw reminisces about the joyful driving experience they had with similar models, stating this particular car is a nice driver, further complemented by @Siowner's remark on its great condition and low mileage, making it an excellent sports car. @39Ford appreciates the attention to detail under the hood and invites potential buyers to embrace open-top motoring with enthusiasm for summer plans.
Neutral: Several comments offer insights into the vehicle's historical context and technical specifications, clarifying its model variations over the years. @bachldrs provides a detailed explanation of the MGB's production timeline, which illustrates how this particular vehicle falls just before the rubber bumper versions were introduced. @RoundHeadlights and @billyblyth discuss carburetor specifications and production dates, contributing valuable information to potential buyers. These neutral observations serve to educate those less familiar with the MGB's history and emphasize the car's original chrome bumper design alongside potential modifications.
Negative: A few comments express confusion or concern regarding certain aspects of the vehicle. For instance, @kretz questions @bachldrs' comment about the paint being tired, arguing that the recent bare metal refinish should not exhibit such issues. @bachldrs later acknowledges the potential misinterpretation and reflects that direct sunlight can sometimes misrepresent a finish, showing a degree of uncertainty about its condition. Additionally, @Mgrescueguy and @car-collector inquire about OEM parts that are no longer available, hinting at a desire for original equipment that may enhance the vehicle's value, suggesting that the car might not be fully original as initially believed.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The auctioneer, @Progressivemtrs (The Seller), welcomes potential buyers to the auction of the 2014 Range Rover Autobiography and expresses a commitment to answering questions throughout the process. They highlight the vehicle's strong operational condition and affirm that previous maintenance was reported to Carfax, instilling confidence in its care. The seller also notes their willingness to ship the vehicle nationwide and appreciates the interest shown by bidders, creating a friendly and professional atmosphere.
Neutral: There is some confusion regarding who is responding to comments, as @RobertMidge steps in to answer questions in the absence of the auction manager, leading to mixed signals. @JBULLY points out the inconsistencies in communication from the seller's team. However, @Progressivemtrs clarifies that the current vehicle setup, including mixed tires, was done by qualified Land Rover technicians, and acknowledges the need for additional information via future videos, showing an openness to address concerns from commenters.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns about the mixed tires on the vehicle, which is atypical for a high-caliber truck with 4WD. @BostonCarGuy questions the decision to mount different brands of tires, while @JBULLY critiques the unclear communication from the auction team regarding responses from @RobertMidge. Additionally, @Progressivemtrs mentions previous painting work done only on the rear bumper due to surface wear, which could raise questions about the vehicle's overall presentation.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Asdspeed welcomes potential buyers to see the car in person, highlighting its excellent condition and the care it has received from the owner over the past 12 years. @maw06 praises the car's immaculate paint and interior, noting it appears as though it just rolled off the assembly line. @Ezy67 shares enthusiasm for the vehicle, commenting on its attractiveness and impressive rims, while mentioning that the E46 continues to draw attention and admiration.
Neutral: @djdevvydev expresses interest in typical issues associated with E46 models, specifically asking about rod bearings, rear subframe, and VANOS. @JFC45 requests for better images of the driver's seat, which @Asdspeed assures will be provided soon. There are mixed reports regarding the rear subframe concerns with convertibles as @scmorgan contributes their skepticism based on their experiences, though acknowledges the specific M3 as a beautiful example.
Negative: @scmorgan firmly refutes the idea that convertibles are reinforced compared to coupes, highlighting the potential for subframe cracks in all E46s and expressing a wish not to mislead potential buyers. @BRG1978 brings attention to some cracked paint on the front bumper, questioning if it's due to an impact or sun damage, to which @Asdspeed admits uncertainty. Overall, concerns about structural integrity and minor cosmetic details temper some of the enthusiasm surrounding the vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed high enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic and performance. @CRUSH described the appeal of the square body design paired with an LS engine, while @boaboyoz praised the K10's vibrant red and white color scheme, calling it 'dynamite' and a 'sensational build.' Other comments from @Beans_Bacon and @sva777 echoed this sentiment, labeling the truck as 'sweet as crap' and 'perfection,' respectively, demonstrating a strong appreciation for the overall look and craftsmanship.
Neutral: Comments also included inquiries about the build process and the specifics of the project. @Luketride acknowledged the quality of the build, remarking on its cleanliness and asking the seller about the total man-hours invested, which implies a desire for a deeper understanding of the effort put into the truck. @lrrjr, the seller, responded by noting that while they didn't keep track of total hours, he estimated about eight months of work, indicating a significant but enjoyable investment of time into the project.
Negative: There seem to be no particularly negative comments regarding the vehicle itself. The overall reception from commenters has been overwhelmingly positive, with no critical feedback or concerns raised about the truck's quality, functionality, or design. Even the seller, responding to the community's admiration, reflected a genuinely thankful and engaging tone, focusing on the joy of creating the truck rather than addressing any drawbacks.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Hoppy18 describes the vehicle as a perfect and inexpensive entry into the classic Mustang world, suggesting it has charm despite a less powerful engine. @denny appreciates the modern driving improvements provided by power front disc brakes and praises the aesthetic fit of the wheels while acknowledging the honesty of the seller regarding certain mechanical issues. He also believes the car holds good value in its current condition, potentially worth $12K to $15K.
Neutral: @REE2 questions the discrepancies in the car's title date versus its VIN and suggests these points should be investigated further. The @CammsFamily (The Seller) explains that a VIN confusion occurred, which has since been clarified through state channels. They also commit to providing photos of the VIN stamps as requested and clarify the title situation, regarding it as a historic purchase likely registered later than its manufacturing date.
Negative: @Mr.Gray warns potential buyers to scrutinize the auction details and past inspections for key issues such as the VIN indicating the car's year and the condition of the floors. He highlights concerns about the shiny appearance possibly masking significant rust, suggesting there could be a lack of transparency in the auction process. @83HURST raises credibility issues regarding the seller's repair cost claims, implying the documented expenses may be inflated for a vehicle requiring attentiveness to rust and restoration.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments highlight the overall fun and utility of the 1985 Big Red, with @Capthorod1 exclaiming that it combines both fun and utility in one vehicle. @BIGRED2025 (The Seller) expresses excitement about the project they have worked on and conveys enthusiasm for the vehicle going to a new home. The seller also engages with bidders and shows appreciation for their interest, indicating a friendly atmosphere around the auction.
Neutral: @BIGRED2025 (The Seller) mentions the vehicle's originality and shares a bit of uncertainty regarding some features like the horn and extra light at the back. They invite feedback and insights from potential buyers about these features, acknowledging that they might be non-standard but look original. Additionally, the seller provides updates about the auction and riding videos that they plan to share, indicating a sense of transparency about the vehicle's condition and performance.
Negative: There are relatively few negative comments, but @VisualWatcher comments that the vehicle resembles a 'buffed-up version' of children's tractor trikes, which could imply a lack of seriousness or ruggedness compared to typical ATVs. This might suggest that some potential buyers perceive it as less than fully robust or serious for adult use, although this sentiment is not strongly echoed by other commenters.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed a lot of admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its modern classic appeal, unique build quality, and impressive details such as the interior design and amenities. @Meinotto described it as a "stellar modern classic," and @1Hotshot appreciated the special nature of its construction, emphasizing the significance of the build journal left behind. Other comments, like those from @dave02a, praised the exceptional quality of the build and the driving experience of these vehicles. @dj_walls2424 also noticed the meticulous attention to detail, indicating the effort put into its design.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on specific details about the car, including the model year as addressed by @Any, who confirmed it is titled as a 2020 model. @racingandfishing shared insights regarding possible driver size limitations and linked to resources for potential buyers to connect with current owners for hands-on experiences. @F1Rocket expressed interest in scheduling a viewing and followed up on communication attempts with the seller, @MDJolly, which suggests a positive level of engagement regarding inquiries about the car.
Negative: While there were no outright negative comments, some questions implied concerns, such as the inquiry by @Meinotto about the car's current turn signals and presence of extra parts. The comment by @IngramPeregrine noting height and weight limitations for potential drivers of the coupe hints at practicality issues that might concern larger individuals. Overall, commentary regarding potential limitations was mostly framed as inquiries for more information rather than criticism.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's capabilities, particularly its unique design as a UNIMOG Fire Truck. @boaboyoz highlighted its coolness, while @Engineer1guy praised the truck for its performance in hard-to-reach areas, indicating that it is ideal for brush fighting. @Andrew37Chevy also noted its good maintenance history and potential versatility, suggesting modifications for different uses. The general consensus among these users fosters excitement about owning such a distinctive truck, with positive sentiments around its utility and construction.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding the vehicle's specifications and operational aspects. @calebbenson8 (The Seller) responded to questions about the water tank capacity, indicating it holds approximately 150-200 gallons based on size. Other users, like @isolovers, requested further information, including a video demonstration of the pump and the condition of the tires, suggesting a need for thorough inspections. @dbehling5 also asked about the tire sizes that might require replacement, showcasing a balanced interest in the practical details and maintenance needs of the truck.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the truck's mechanical and aesthetic conditions. @isolovers expressed hesitation due to the necessary repairs and specifications that may not meet their needs, while @Mrcreative1 questioned the truck's ability to connect to a draft hydrant for enhanced water capacity, indicating a lack of clear answers from the seller. Additionally, comments from @FrozenNorthCMB and others brought attention to potential issues with cracked tires and malfunctioning lights, suggesting worries over safety and functionality that future buyers might need to address.
1997 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra Roush Stage 2 Convertible 5-Speed for Charity
1FALP46V7VF203691
Lot 190139
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @koodoo praised the initiative surrounding the auction, calling the car beautiful. @KP777 expressed enthusiasm for the Mustang, hoping the auction raises double the value for charity. @pbennett commented on the car's cleanliness and beauty, looking forward to its auction. @VanHooterman described the car as gorgeous and appreciated the donation's purpose. @The_BobEvans highlighted the great quality of the auction pictures, showing interest in preserving those images if he were to win the car. @Jesse_Petersen complimented the car's overall appearance and acknowledged the positive impact of the sale proceeds.
Neutral: @Darrelljohnson685 mentioned that the auction proceeds would directly support survivors of human trafficking, aiming to empower them. @mrp5150 and @kansas2win engaged in a discussion about the car's branding, questioning its authenticity as a Roush vehicle. @earlebird inquired about the air conditioning and the presence of a boot for the convertible. @hipomatt and @msb19 raised concerns regarding Roush documentation, seeking additional proof of the car's Roush components. Remarks by @Napcos suggested that the car might not include all expected upgrades associated with a Roush stage II model.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @hipomatt and @msb19 about the authenticity of the Roush branding, pointing out that the Roush components identified might not be original to the vehicle. @Napcos insisted that the vehicle did not meet the specifications of a Roush stage II due to the absence of upgraded suspension components. Additionally, @earlebird questioned the functionality of the air conditioning unit not blowing cold, while @Jesse_Petersen detailed potential discrepancies regarding the car’s build components and questioned the documentation further.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @troys_325 (The Seller) expresses excitement about the Cherokee auction, highlighting that it is a well-maintained vehicle that retains many original features despite being modified. Commenters such as @Outsidethewall03 and @Todd_Z commend the vehicle's impressive build and aesthetics, appreciating the detailed fiberglass work and overall look. @PLeaseLetMeWinThis shared a personal connection, hoping to enjoy quality family time in this beautiful rig, while @Uvacarbuff acknowledges the smooth operation of the transfer case and functionality of the A/C.
Neutral: @Uvacarbuff and @bjeff77 ask technical questions regarding the transfer case, cruising speed, and seating arrangement, indicating a practical interest in the vehicle's usability for different purposes. @TheKeithStone inquires about the mechanical condition of various features like windows and lights, to which @troys_325 provided informative responses regarding the vehicle's functionality. The seller also emphasizes the great condition of the drivetrain and how maintenance has been performed without extensive repairs.
Negative: Concerns arose regarding the rattling noises noted in the driving video, with @Uvacarbuff questioning if there might be issues with the suspension or interior parts. @troys_325 addressed these concerns by explaining that recent new bushings in the control arms were responsible for the creaking and reassured potential buyers that everything is still tight, even offering to assist with tuning the shocks if needed. Despite some minor flaws, the overall feedback is generally positive, focusing on the vehicle's character and performance.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their interest in the vehicle, particularly noting the aesthetic appeal and features of the 2003 Mercedes Benz R230 SL55 AMG. @beckzach05 shared a positive personal experience from a previous purchase with @aegmotorsports, highlighting accurate representations of the car's condition and smooth transaction process. Additionally, @TommyC and others inquired about upcoming videos to showcase the vehicle, indicating a strong interest in seeing more details and performance demonstrations.
Neutral: Several comments focused on technical inquiries and specifications, showcasing a curiosity about the vehicle's components. @Lifesave asked about potential issues related to the removed resonators, to which @aegmotorsports explained that their removal would not interfere with system functions. Similarly, @nrfmartin inquired about the original ABC tandem pump, and @keibet raised concerns about the gas tank and its susceptibility to issues common in earlier models; both questions received reassuring responses from the seller regarding the parts' performance.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding potential mechanical issues, particularly in relation to the original gas tank and ABC tandem pump. @keibet highlighted a common issue with older SL55 models that could lead to expensive repairs, reflecting skepticism among potential buyers. Although @aegmotorsports addressed these worries by clarifying the current condition of the parts, the existence of such inquiries indicates that some potential buyers may still harbor doubts about the vehicle's reliability.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express a strong appreciation for the yellow color of the 1999 Prowler, with @michaelmotorcar acknowledging it as the rarest and his favorite among all the Prowlers. @RetiredChief also praises the yellow, mentioning that it stands out especially in sunlight, and @joeram supports this sentiment by sharing his personal experience with owning multiple Prowlers and favoring the yellow version. Overall, there is a shared enthusiasm for the car's striking color, contributing to its desirability among collectors and car enthusiasts alike.
Neutral: The auction for the yellow Prowler is being held by @michaelmotorcar, who promotes it as the most exceptional of the Prowlers available, noting that it will be sold to the highest bidder in a no-reserve auction. @Carguy28 comments on the harmonious relationship between owning multiple cars, including a purple Prowler and other yellow vehicles, highlighting a collector's perspective. Other interactions among users show a light-hearted camaraderie, discussing their car collections and preferences without deeper critiques of the vehicle itself or the auction.
Negative: There are minor negative sentiments, such as a humorous comment from @rb21 questioning if a dog comes with the car, suggesting a lack of seriousness regarding the auction or the car itself. Additionally, @VisualWatcher's offbeat comment referencing pizza seems to divert from the main excitement about the Prowler, possibly indicating a lack of full engagement with the auction topic. These comments introduce a lighter, less enthusiastic tone contrasting the overall positive feedback surrounding the vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The overall sentiments regarding the vehicle highlight its attractive features and solid ownership history. @Drewmeyer97, the seller, shares pride in the bright orange color of the 1974 Beetle, mentioning how it stands out especially in sunlight. Several commenters, including @creuzahome and @FriBor, praise the eye-catching aesthetics and the vehicle's good condition, appreciating that it is a well-maintained example of a classic model, even at 51 years old. @Drewmeyer97 also confirms a successful track record with the car, stating that every drive has been trouble-free and the car runs smoothly, with no significant mechanical issues reported.
Neutral: While some comments highlight specific details and corrections regarding the listing, most seem to agree on the general understanding of the car's characteristics. @Kayemtee points out a potential mix-up in the listing regarding suspension type, asserting it should accurately reflect the vehicle's specifications. Commenters like @Pfeil and @MConverse74 engage in a discussion about historic manufacturing differences between standard Beetles and Super Beetles, indicating a shared interest in the car's history and potential discrepancies in its description. @fbuzz thoughtfully notes the importance of vehicle maintenance over the years, which aligns with others' observations about the car's upkeep despite some small details that may need addressing.
Negative: Conversely, some criticisms emerge regarding the vehicle's historical accuracy and safety considerations. @agm008 raises concerns about the alternator light and the unaddressed oil leak, suggesting a need for thorough mechanical checks. @fbuzz provides a more serious critique, highlighting a potentially hazardous aftermarket fuel filter setup that poses a fire risk, which should be corrected for safety. Additionally, @TJC45 and @VWTony's flagged comments suggest a negative reception to certain aspects of the listing and responses, indicating that there might be confusion or contention surrounding the vehicle's classification and description based on the models' historical standards.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle's rare color combination and overall condition. @unicorn_garage notes the car is remarkably well preserved, highlighting its low mileage of 16K miles and the classy aesthetics of both the interior and paint. Furthermore, they appreciate the recent comprehensive maintenance that has addressed critical issues, emphasizing that it is increasingly rare to find vehicles in such excellent condition. @whipcity76 also thanks @autocentroimports for their prompt responses, showing appreciation for the seller's engagement with potential buyers. Overall, the vehicle is perceived as a true classic find with impressive features.
Neutral: There are inquiries from potential buyers, such as @whipcity76 and @Bklyn718, seeking clarity on specific maintenance details including the replacement of the speedometer, transmission linkage, and stains on the soft top. @Pstackhouse shows interest in the VIN details and how it compares to another vehicle they own, while also raising a question about the possible A/C conversion. These comments reflect a desire for detailed information without expressing strong positive or negative sentiments about the car as a whole.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised, particularly regarding the stains on the soft top, noted by @aspenburghound and @Sniff38, who question whether these are mold and if they can be cleaned. @BlueLotus also points out that the undercarriage appears to have been resprayed, prompting questions about past maintenance. While these issues do not overshadow the vehicle's value, they indicate that potential buyers are attentive to its upkeep and history, suggesting reservations that need to be addressed.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @IOutBidYou noted that the vehicle is in great condition, similar to another listing but with a different year and slightly more mileage. The seller, @DC_MotorWerks, provided prompt responses and expressed willingness to create a video to showcase the vehicle. Additionally, @DC_MotorWerks confirmed the lack of abnormal smells or dog hair, assuring potential buyers of the car's cleanliness.
Neutral: @OldNewsGuy inquired about the Premium 1 package and its inclusion of a backup camera, which @DC_MotorWerks clarified was not available for that year but indicated that installing one later would be easy. @IRSBedeviler asked about the previous owner's habits regarding smoking or pets, to which the seller responded positively. Furthermore, @Cmacsell requested an auto squads report, but there was a lack of familiarity from the seller regarding what that entails.
Negative: @IOutBidYou pointed out that while fitting a backup camera might be straightforward, addressing dead pixels on the vehicle's screen could pose an issue. @IRSBedeviler was also concerned about the number of keyless entry fobs available, which @DC_MotorWerks confirmed was limited to just one. @TangerineDream's question about replacing headlamps before delivery suggested some potential uncertainty regarding the vehicle's maintenance or readiness.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @SAABNUTT expressed love for the vehicle, praising it as a cool ride perfect for fun experiences such as cruising along Cape Cod's beaches. @Docgreg60 noted that the vehicle is super clean and well done, while @JoeMommia, the seller, highlighted the buggy's impressive details, including its lightweight and powerful aluminum V8 engine, which he claims is well-balanced and a popular choice among hot rod enthusiasts. @a990dna reminisced about the thrills of similar vehicles, suggesting that the aluminum Buick V8 engine would provide an exhilarating experience. Overall, many commenters appreciate the unique features and potential of the buggy, viewed as a blast to drive.
Neutral: Commenters had various technical inquiries and observations about the vehicle. @930budwi sought clarification about the transaxle and its build quality while @Valkyrja provided insights into the engine's horsepower specifications, indicating a range depending on the carburetor installed. @rustyray commented on the reliability of the frame repair after a thorough inspection, advising that while it should be an easy fix, the quality of the weld is crucial. @KoBear1 and @AthensCarGuy were both interested in a cold start video and driving footage, while @Chipm209 discussed potential modifications for trail use, showing interest in the vehicle's versatility.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the buggy. @40fordlover inquired about highlighted frame cracks, and @VolvoguyKC remarked that the rear tires appeared too small, leading to a decision to abstain from bidding. @Duncan_same_old mentioned potential issues with the vehicle's weight distribution based on the engine's configuration, expressing curiosity about its performance. Additionally, @javaoz sought assurances about the possibility of arranging a delayed pickup after purchase, demonstrating uncertainty regarding logistics. These negative comments reflect a cautious approach and highlight specific details that may deter potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TTX (The Seller) confirmed that the vehicle runs and drives well, alleviating concerns from potential buyers like @Wendymomof2. The seller also assured that genuine EK9 tail lights will be included with the sale, addressing questions from users @tdc_2022 and @IkeHuminspurts.
Neutral: Comments reflect curiosity and requests for detailed information. @vtec4ever and @DetailKing12 inquired about the availability of factory body parts, while @RenownUSA asked for the auction sheet from Japan. @Wr4if expressed interest in understanding why bids for the vehicle were low, suggesting that community interest may vary.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the quality and consistency of the vehicle's parts. @tdc_2022 noted discrepancies in the tail lights, while @turbo3.6 requested clarification about the headlights being OEM. Additionally, @bryant619 expressed disappointment over the missed opportunity to purchase the vehicle, and @Ubrgti mentioned having multiple missed calls from the seller, hinting at communication issues.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @tyager expresses strong enthusiasm about the vehicle with a simple, emotive comment. @DennisKing appreciates the color of the vehicle, describing it as stellar and wishing good luck with the auction. @Mrhoppy acknowledges the seller's effort in providing documentation and humorously comments on the vehicle's need for wiper blades, while also complimenting its appearance.
Neutral: @BerkshirePathway (The Seller) provides detailed information regarding the vehicle's history and condition, addressing concerns raised by potential buyers about undercarriage pictures and cam chain records. The seller mentions that the vehicle has had regular maintenance and emphasizes that it has primarily been driven on highways with minimal rough use. The dialogue shows an effort to keep potential buyers informed about the vehicle's maintenance records and condition without overly embellishing.
Negative: @JBULLY and @ArmyPAC raise concerns about the limited undercarriage photographs and are waiting for service records, suggesting a need for more thorough documentation to ensure buyer confidence. @Dan_in_Reno also inquires about the cam chains, expressing skepticism regarding their maintenance history. @DennisKing notes that the bidding seems lower than expected, which raises questions about the vehicle's appeal in the market.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @HTSmith (The Seller) provided a thorough description of the 1991 F-150 XLT Lariat 4x4, highlighting its remarkable maintenance history and extensive documentation since original purchase. Commenters like @MCHayes and @Hairball expressed appreciation for the truck's size and features, indicating that the 6.75-foot bed and its overall short bed extended cab design are seen as advantageous. The seller also noted the vehicle's impressive performance during a long drive, achieving 17-19 mpg, which was positively acknowledged by those following the auction.
Neutral: @HTSmith shared driving and start-up videos to showcase the truck's functionality, which was requested by @MCHayes. In response to inquiries about the truck's specs and towing capacity, the seller confirmed the bed length and provided helpful spec sheets, stating a max trailer weight capacity of 6,700 lbs. These clarifications have maintained an informative tone, contributing to the potential buyer's understanding of the vehicle's capabilities.
Negative: There were some reservations expressed by commenters regarding the towing capacity and bed specifications, such as @alfagta seeking more information about the 6.5-foot vs 6.75-foot bed and towing potential. @ChrisLopez raised concerns about additional fees associated with the purchase, although @HTSmith clarified that no dealer document fees would be charged, which aimed to alleviate buyer concerns but still indicated the complexity of purchasing vehicles through online auctions. Overall, there were no major negative comments, but some uncertainty persisted regarding specific capabilities of the vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Deangelis007 appreciated the driving video presentation of the vehicle, indicating a positive engagement with the content. The overall customer experience promised by @Collectibleclassics, the seller, is also noted as excellent, with high Google review ratings suggesting satisfaction among previous clients. They highlight their commitment to transparency and customer service, ensuring potential buyers feel confident in their purchase process.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics provided comprehensive information about the services offered, including trade-ins, consignments, and expedited nationwide shipping. The seller emphasizes their willingness to answer questions and engage with bidders, reinforcing a customer-friendly approach. They invite potential buyers to inspect the vehicle and review the auction procedures, indicating a structured and clear auction environment.
Negative: @hrivasmd raised a concern about the condition of the vehicle, specifically questioning the presence of multiple white dots on the hood and whether they are scratches. This indicates a possible issue that could affect a buyer's confidence in the vehicle's condition. While @Collectibleclassics attempted to address these concerns by referencing an imperfections video, the query reflects a need for further clarification on the vehicle's aesthetic and maintenance.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the car's attractive design and commend the build quality. @dj_walls2424 particularly appreciates the blue color and considers it a very nice build, while @Cafe-dave notes the car looks great and suggests it should be priced accessibly. Additionally, @stufrank expresses admiration for the car's aesthetics, stating that the blue is stunning, which aligns well with others who have a positive view on the vehicle's overall appearance and value.
Neutral: Several users engage in discussions comparing the differences between the Mk2 and Mk4 models, indicating some confusion around the vehicle's VIN, which @DweadPiwate explains may suggest it is a pre-Mk3 vehicle. @WilliamMaher (The Seller) is proactive in seeking clarity about the car's historical data and addressing any potential misunderstandings related to its classification. Many commenters appreciate the educational links provided regarding the Factory Five Roadster model history.
Negative: A few comments indicate concerns regarding the listing and provide constructive criticism, such as @stufrank, who points out the lack of photos of the rear end and the underside of the car, suggesting that additional images could enhance buyer confidence. @Cdn043 insists that the listing should be corrected to accurately reflect that it is a Mk2, not a Mk4, pointing out that this misrepresentation could mislead potential buyers. These remarks underscore the importance of transparent and thorough listings in the auction process.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express appreciation for the vehicle's low mileage and overall condition. @TRGSALES mentions that it is unique and beautiful, affirming that it is the only one like it in existence. @Spider_Mike refers to it as a 'real jewel', indicating that a 12-year-old RAV4 with low mileage is quite rare. @aSingh39 shares a positive personal experience with a similar model, noting its reliability and excellent performance, suggesting that this particular vehicle will likely outlive many.
Neutral: Several comments highlight curiosity about the vehicle's usage patterns and previous ownership. @joaquin_h raises a question about why the vehicle has low mileage and whether it was used infrequently or only for short trips. @TRGSALES responds, clarifying that the owner was an older gentleman who did not drive often and provided a detailed account of the vehicle's care and condition. The missing photos mentioned by @BrokenAdam indicate a desire for more visual assurance regarding specific vehicle parts, but the seller maintains that the vehicle has been well-maintained and inspected.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the vehicle's low mileage and its implications. @stevefi12345 points to potential issues due to the vehicle being in a rust belt state, suggesting worries over undercarriage conditions. @rustyray voices a legitimate concern regarding cylinder wash down from infrequent use, recommending a compression check to ensure the engine's health. @TRGSALES attempts to alleviate these concerns by stressing that the vehicle has been fully inspected and remains in excellent condition, but the apprehensions about low usage linger among some commenters.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and desirable features. @MilleMiglia described the 'Iridium Silver Metallic' color as beautiful, while @David993S praised the SL550 for its 'just enough miles to ensure things are working as they should.' @carenthusiast2020 echoed this sentiment, stating their own experience with a 2009 model has been positive, and they appreciate how well it performs compared to newer models. Overall, there seems to be a consensus that the SL550 is an impressive car that offers a fantastic driving experience.
Neutral: Some comments were focused on clarifying details and addressing concerns about the vehicle's condition. @vardam raised a question about a potential typo in the odometer reading, which was confirmed by @aegmotorsports, the seller, who stated a correction has been submitted to Carfax. @NoDeuda commented on the visibility of undercarriage photos, suggesting improvements could be made. Additionally, @rmoudry sought reassurance regarding the vehicle's suspension and roof functionality, which @aegmotorsports promptly addressed, ensuring there are no issues with the ABC suspension and confirming the top works correctly.
Negative: There were minimal negative comments, with @NoDeuda raising concerns about the clarity of undercarriage photos, indicating a need for more detailed imagery. @rmoudry's inquiries suggested hesitance surrounding the maintenance history, particularly regarding the testing of suspension and roof operations. Although @vardam's original comment hinted at a possible discrepancy in the mileage report, this concern was resolved by the seller. Overall, the negative feedback primarily revolved around requests for additional assurance and information rather than outright criticism.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters are enthusiastic about the vehicle's unique characteristics and nostalgic value. @EdmontonCarGuy expresses excitement about seeing a 10-speed version, reminiscing that he only recalls 3 and 5 speed options from his childhood. @PDXBryan reminisces about the coolness of the bike's design and its features, noting that the Ross name brings back fond memories. @TomPayne praises the bike's quality and rarity, stating it represents a serious piece of bicycle history, while @appinvest expresses admiration for the bike, indicating it would make a valuable addition to their own collection of muscle bikes.
Neutral: There are also a variety of neutral observations regarding the vehicle's uniqueness and rarity, albeit some skepticism about its valuation. @letthegypsyhaveit acknowledges the bike's rarity but suggests that rarity does not automatically confer high value, which @Dean_Laumbach (The Seller) responds to, emphasizing the importance of originality in collectible items. Multiple commenters, including @emg111, highlight the distinction between this Ross bike and the more commonly found Schwinn Stingray, suggesting that while others exist, the condition and quality of this particular bike are noteworthy.
Negative: On the downside, some comments reflect a more critical view or express disappointment over pricing and availability. @Beans_Bacon humorously shares their dismay about being unable to afford both cars and bicycles on Bring A Trailer, indicating a sense of frustration with their financial situation. @letthegypsyhaveit and others question the perceived value of the vehicle, indicating that while it’s cool, it might not hold the same market esteem as its competitors from Schwinn. Meanwhile, @Dano reflects on a childhood experience that parallels the disappointment of not having a Schwinn, suggesting a nostalgia for a time when bicycles offered a different kind of value to kids. This mixed sentiment implies that though the bike is appreciated, it still faces scrutiny over its standing in the collectible market.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Twigg353 praises the truck as immaculate, emphasizing the quality of the vehicle while commending the seller. @SwissMovement comments on the classic color combination, stating that it looks great. @flatdash expresses satisfaction with their own similar truck, highlighting that it still drives as new and recommending rigorous maintenance to prevent engine issues, indicating a positive outlook on the vehicle's durability.
Neutral: @Westcoast2727 requests information about the towing package and expresses interest in adding Apple CarPlay, asking for confirmation about the software version required for compatibility. @genevamotorcars (The Seller) responds to inquiries, stating that the truck does not have the towing package but can be added for a fee. Also, they clarify the software compatibility for the Apple CarPlay installation and mention that their service shop can handle the conversion.
Negative: @gaadiwaala points out a dent on the truck's door, asking for an estimate to fix it, which suggests that the truck may not be in perfect cosmetic condition. @Westcoast2727 further discusses the technical requirements for adding Apple CarPlay, implying that there may be limitations based on the model year, adding a potential frustration for interested buyers. Overall, some concerns about additional costs and repairs are brought up, contrasting with the positive remarks.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Numerous commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and features. @lunchbocks2002 noted its rare triple black color and the appealing Hurst T-tops, while @96NSXTJVA described it as a 'beautiful car' that has been 'tastefully restored and preserved'. Additionally, @Norsky644 (The Seller) engaged positively with potential buyers, emphasizing their enjoyable experience with the car and their commitment to answering any questions promptly, indicating a caring and attentive seller.
Neutral: Commenters engaged in technical discussions regarding the car's specifications and restoration process. @windupman inquired about the engine specs, while @IK54 questioned the originality of the Hurst T-tops versus the Fisher ones given the car's late production year. @ebeker asked about the condition of the car's floor and trunk, expecting clarity on potential patches or restorations. The back-and-forth established a sense of community and interest among enthusiasts, with both @Norsky644 (The Seller) and others contributing informative responses.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about specific issues related to the vehicle. @ebeker probed about possible patches on the floor and trunk, indicating apprehension about the car's structural integrity. Additionally, there were inquiries regarding the car's ability to handle rain due to the T-tops, given @Norsky644 (The Seller)'s mention of minor leaks. Furthermore, @Frog928S questioned the status of the air-conditioning system, suggesting that potential buyers should be aware of required repairs.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @dzguy expressed his admiration for the bike, describing it as absolutely beautiful and wishing he could own it despite it being on the other side of the country. @A65 (The Seller) acknowledged the great memories associated with the bike, emphasizing its unique old school chopper styling, and mentioned the many compliments it receives. @JuanPablo also complimented the Springer and noted the nice accessories, despite considering the shipping cost a barrier for his bidding.
Neutral: @PebbleBeachDave inquired about the cam chain tensioners and oil pump, to which @A65 (The Seller) confirmed that both were original but noted there have been discussions about replacement. He also provided some details regarding previous service records, highlighting the challenges in obtaining comprehensive documentation from the dealer. @Charliejones408 contributed to the conversation by discussing the historical context of the Harley models mentioned and pointed out the bike's attractive features without making a firm judgment.
Negative: @PebbleBeachDave raised several concerns about the bike's condition, including whether it had ever been dropped and whether the dealer had addressed known issues with the cam bearing, pointing out the lack of firm answers regarding previous work done. @Charliejones408 noted the problematic nature of the 88A twin cam engine compared to its successors, suggesting there might be underlying issues. The absence of detailed service records from @A65 (The Seller) regarding the bearing replacement left some potential buyers feeling uncertain about the bike's overall maintenance history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and low mileage. @Craven describes the Spring Edition Caddy as a fitting choice for the autumn of life, while @Whew,lincolnsandcaddies believes this generation of de Ville's is excellent. @Drochel1 notes the impressive condition of the car, mentioning the clean top in the pictures and offering good luck with the sale. @KatManDew appreciates the color combination and suitability for cruising, indicating that it will make a future owner's day.
Neutral: A few comments addressed the car's condition and functionality. @Santi97, the seller, engages with potential buyers by answering questions about the vehicle's ABS problem and a potential fluid leak observed by @tennisfan23. The seller reassures that the brake light is off and that the vehicle has not required any oil additions, maintaining the promise of good maintenance. @DKARMOL brings up a past alignment check that resulted in a failure, to which @Santi97 responds that the vehicle does not show signs of uneven wear, suggesting confidence in the car's current performance despite prior concerns.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the car's mechanical issues and overall condition. @smsouthworth inquired about the diagnosed ABS issue, while @tennisfan23 pointed out possible fluid seepage, which might indicate an active leak. Although @Santi97 reassured potential buyers by promising that the car is running well and has had its maintenance handled, the mention of these problems may cast a shadow of doubt for some interested parties.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle, a 2002 Dodge Ram 2500, has received numerous compliments for its excellent condition and the interesting backstory revealed by @rlachney10177 (The Seller). Commenters like @Rowdyroyce noted its appeal with positive remarks about the truck, and @PDXBryan mentioned it would make an outstanding delivery truck due to its unique history. @rlachney10177 emphasized the truck's mechanical integrity, describing how he added over 60 miles and noting it operates like new even at high speeds. The detailed attention to maintenance has left many potential buyers feeling confident about its quality, reinforced by the sharing of thermal imaging and videos demonstrating its functionality and comfort features.
Neutral: Commenters such as @Chamba and @RWN525 inquired about the vehicle's engine hour and specifics regarding modifications like the glove compartment hinges, which @rlachney10177 explained were upgraded for durability. There was some interest in the surveillance equipment that had initially been fitted to the truck; however, @CRUSH and others expressed curiosity about what remained after its removal. @Dodgeman23 nostalgically wished the vehicle still had its original surveillance equipment, while @lovebohn confirmed the vehicle is a two-wheel drive, eliciting mixed feelings about its intended use for farming versus its unique past.
Negative: Some negative comments arose regarding the truck's cleanliness, particularly under the hood, with @hlewis7513 finding it oddly dirty compared to the rest of the truck's condition. Concerns about potential wear and questions about the engine's idling time were raised by @divertab2, suggesting that surveillance use would mean more engine running time, although @rlachney10177 clarified that a battery bank powered most of the surveillance setup, minimizing wear on the engine. Overall, while the majority of feedback has been positive, a few commenters presented skepticism about the truck's history and its current state.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BradleyW88 describes the vehicle as 'sweet', showcasing a favorable impression. @0luke1 humorously references the iconic movie character Dirk Diggler, suggesting that the car is so appealing that it is bound to attract attention. @RJett expresses a wish that this vehicle would appear as a ride option when ordering an Uber, highlighting its desirability. The seller, @Venture09, positively promotes the car's unique features such as the fog machine and the stunning paint job, adding that the fog equipment can be removed for more traditional use.
Neutral: @Venture09 clarifies aspects about the vehicle, addressing comments regarding its features. The seller explains that the fog machine is powered by deep cell batteries and can be controlled remotely, enhancing the driving experience especially with the windows down. Details about the car's appearance, including the distinction between paint and vinyl stickers, are also communicated, reinforcing transparency about the product being sold.
Negative: @ronsant questions the purpose of what appears to be a fog machine in the back of the car, indicating a possible concern about practicality or functionality. The playful mention of the seller's identification as Bruce Wayne by @Glenn930 implies a light-hearted skepticism regarding the overall theme of the vehicle, which some might see as a gimmick. While the comments are generally positive, the few neutral and negative remarks hint at potential concerns that some buyers might have, particularly about the car's unusual features.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Fmandan77 mentioned that the truck looks really clean, which aligns with @ColinCyyz's observation of the truck being well maintained and optioned for towing. The detailed vehicle specification provided by @newcarpro reinforces this perception, listing positive aspects such as the year of build and detailed descriptions of components. Additionally, @lifetime4170 (The Seller) emphasizes the careful maintenance history with over 20 documented oil changes and various repairs before the sale, including the brakes and transmission, which adds to the vehicle's reliability and care.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @tritfright4 and @jimfodell, raised questions about specific features and conditions of the vehicle. @tritfright4 inquired about the condition of the undercarriage, while @jimfodell sought clarification on whether the truck comes with a long bed or not. @Fmandan77 asked about the presence of leaks and the condition of the instrument cluster, which @lifetime4170 (The Seller) addressed by clarifying that it has a standard 6 3/4 ft bed and confirming its clean condition without leaks. The seller also mentioned a small crack in the cluster, showing the readiness to provide detailed information.
Negative: @Fmandan77 pointed out potential concerns, such as a small crack on the instrument cluster and adhesive residue on the dash. Although @lifetime4170 (The Seller) provided some answers, the lack of documentation for certain services mentioned raises questions. @ColinCyyz's inquiries regarding the condition of the brakes, suspension components, and transmission service records also suggest a need for more assurance about the vehicle's operational integrity, especially given its previous use for towing, which could indicate a heavier wear.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Thatch praised the vehicle as "Everyman’s perfect bike," asserting that with the addition of a windshield, it meets all expectations. @Ben_Drinking_Coffee mentioned the beauty of the bike, noting how such classic models resonate with those who have experience working on them. @buellwinkle expressed admiration for the bike's aesthetic appeal, recounting how it made him retrieve his camera, emphasizing the pleasant emotions evoked by its presence for any potential new owner. Furthermore, @Hailwood commended the beautiful rebuild and sought specific details about the replacement exhaust and existing parts.
Neutral: Several commentators, including @Mouse51 and @Kasindy, posed insightful questions regarding specific mechanical aspects of the bike. They inquired about the condition of the motor, whether various components had been replaced, and the adequacy of the chrome under normal riding conditions. @Motogrotto also offered clarification on the compatibility of Guzzi saddle bags with the Eldorado's structure. The Seller, @Melanee10, provided detailed responses to inquiries, including information about the engine's inspection and the provenance of painting decisions, indicating a level of transparency and thoroughness in the vehicle's maintenance and presentation.
Negative: There were concerns noted by @Walton77 regarding the long-term durability of the chrome components, cautioning that chrome could flake over decades, despite the bike currently appearing in excellent shape. Additionally, @Walton77 expressed skepticism about the seemingly perfect condition of the chrome cylinders, suggesting that they might not remain flawless indefinitely, which could lead to costly repairs. @Mouse51 questioned aspects of mechanical reliability, including the lack of an oil filter in this model and the overall lifespan of the chromed bores, revealing an anxious undercurrent among potential buyers about the bike's durability over time.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @goldmanj (The Seller) describes the Benelli 250 Quattro as an extremely rare and unique motorcycle, highlighting its excellent handling, lightweight design, and intoxicating sound that impresses even in video form. Commenter @CSAZAR expresses enthusiasm, calling the bike awesome, while @Tom_S. refers to it as too cool and appreciates the quality of the seller's prior auctions. @whiterabbit66 reminisces fondly about the bike, noting its rarity in the US and expressing admiration for its sound, which surpasses their memories.
Neutral: The seller elaborates on the history of the Benelli motorcycle company, detailing the significance of the 231 cc engine and the context of the Benelli 250 Quattro's introduction. They also share their journey in collecting these vintage bikes, including finding and importing a 1978 Benelli 250 Quattro, while @quincydubois reflects humorously on their grandfather's affinity for Italian culture and products. The comments indicate curiosity about the bike's authenticity, with @zman asking about potential aftermarket modifications, and @goldmanj clarifying that the bike remains original with a few updates to ensure correctness and functionality.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the bike's tire condition, particularly the front tire, which was manufactured in 1991 and potentially may need replacement for frequent riding. @goldmanj (The Seller) acknowledges this issue but emphasizes that the rear tire is in good condition and visually matches original specifications. Additionally, they mention the grips being possibly non-original, indicating that while the bike is correct in many respects, there are minor uncertainties regarding some components, which could be considered drawbacks by potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TommyPorsch, the seller, demonstrates a high level of care for the vehicle, mentioning that he changed the transmission fluid three times and recently changed the oil as well. He provided receipts from a trusted shop, indicating that he maintains the car appropriately. He also shows readiness to facilitate inspections by asking @scotimmo when they would like to come and inspect the car and follows up with contact details and options for meeting.
Neutral: The communication between @scotimmo and @TommyPorsch seems to stem from confusion regarding the inspection of the vehicle. @scotimmo is looking to inspect the car but is unclear about the location and claims he has not received adequate response from the seller. @TommyPorsch attempts to clarify the situation by providing the address in Cranford, NJ, and requesting a phone call to arrange a suitable time for inspection. He also inquires if @scotimmo prefers a mechanic shop or a park for the inspection.
Negative: There is a sense of frustration expressed by @scotimmo, who feels unable to proceed with inspecting the vehicle due to a lack of clear communication from the seller. @TommyPorsch replies with concern, asking @scotimmo not to accuse him of scamming and pointing out that @scotimmo has not followed up after receiving his previous messages. This indicates a deteriorating interaction, with @TommyPorsch implying that @scotimmo may not be a serious buyer due to the lack of contact.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments about the vehicle indicate a strong appreciation for its historical significance and aesthetic appeal. @PDXBryan expresses nostalgia for the bike's brand identity, praising the classic Kawasaki green and white color scheme. @MonteCutlass admires the design, stating it pays homage to the 70s, while @Knuckles-R-Busted complements the iconic Kawi green. The seller, @Hawgeyemike, highlights the bike's rarity as an original survivor from a charismatic era of Japanese trials bikes, collecting positive feedback from the audience who shares personal stories about their experiences with similar models. @rofandofy adds that the bike looks excellent and is rare, reinforcing its desirability among collectors.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the details of the bike and its modifications without strong emotional reactions. @jayhd1 inquires about the availability of original parts, indicating interest in restoring the bike to its stock condition. @KeithRichards shares his experience owning a similar bike, reminiscing about its performance and reiterating the model's history without an overt opinion about the current condition of this specific bike. @Hawgeyemike, the seller, provides details about the bike's modifications, its history of being displayed at a dealership, and the assurance of its low mileage, while encouraging further inquiries, appreciated by the audience.
Negative: There are some criticisms surrounding the bike, specifically regarding its modifications. @AB70 expresses a negative opinion about the seat, implying it detracts from the bike's overall appeal. @KeithRichards requests additional pictures to check for potential damage caused by the modified seat, showing concern over the bike's condition. While some comments reflect a desire to revert modifications, this highlights a division between those who appreciate the bike's current state and those who prefer its original specifications. Despite these criticisms, they underline the bike's unique character and collectible nature.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a lot of admiration for its condition and beauty, with @Rguy calling it gorgeous and @Arochojo85 describing it as nice. @AlohaZ3 praised the maintenance worth $13k, referring to the car as a deserving 'unicorn' from the late '90s USDM Mitsu era. The seller, @michaelmotorcar, emphasized the car's exceptional condition with a thorough upkeep history, stating it is one of the best examples seen in decades, and highlighted that it has no reserve, making it an exciting auction opportunity. @MarksGTR also added that the significant repairs made were intended to make it a turn-key vehicle, while @Marcz55 noted the rarity of the vehicle as a nearly all-original piece from the 99 model year.
Neutral: Several comments reflect on the vehicle's history and current auction status. @nkochary commented on the design of the car, suggesting it surpasses many modern touring coupes. @TomLU86 reminisced about Mitsubishi's past models, expressing curiosity about what happened to the brand, while @OMGRedDeviL echoed similar concerns about Mitsubishi's decline post the Fast and Furious franchise. The seller confirmed the car was kept too nice for extensive modifications, indicating its pristine condition despite any potential buyer adjustments. There are remarks about video evidence showing the car's performance capabilities, with @GSX1998 discussing its potential on the road.
Negative: Criticism exists around the vehicle's value and condition perceptions. @MrRideOrDie questioned if the car is merely being sold for profit rather than genuine enjoyment, and others, like @4G63T and @Local_1, raised concerns about previous maintenance issues and the true state of the car's underside despite new photos. @Smricha2 reflected on earlier auctions that showed less favorable views of the car's condition, expressing skepticism about its current state compared to those previous images. @Gifford36 asked if there are any oil leaks, hinting at concerns about the car's mechanical reliability. Additionally, some commenters questioned the reasoning behind the high $13k maintenance costs, with @OFaceDrew finding it absurd in relation to the vehicle's appeal.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its beauty and overall appeal. @TheGuesser commented on its aesthetic with enthusiasm, wishing luck for the auction. @E86_nerd praised the car for its low mileage and reliability, stating that it makes for a comfortable cruiser at a great price, further agreeing with the seller that the car is an excellent choice devoid of troublesome features. @beantownbriggs shared their positive experience with the inline six engine, highlighting its performance and reliability, while @Carneed (The Seller) reaffirmed confidence in the car's condition following maintenance and inspections, inviting potential buyers to view it in person and encouraging pre-purchase inspections.
Neutral: Several comments addressed the vehicle's specific features without expressing strong opinions. @F16Jock mentioned a preference for all-wheel drive or front-wheel drive, acknowledging the vehicle's overall attractiveness. @leightoncutler brought up a curiosity about the exhaust system's design, which sparked a discussion among commenters about the differences between the 640i and the 650i models. The seller, @Carneed, provided clarifications on various inquiries, including details about the exhaust design and availability of two sets of keys, maintaining an informative tone throughout.
Negative: A few negative or critical notes surfaced in the comments. @F16Jock raised concerns about a potential smoke smell, which @Carneed was quick to dismiss, assuring them of a smoke-free environment and the pleasant scent of leather. Additionally, @leightoncutler expressed doubts about the exhaust design, suggesting it seemed functional rather than cosmetic. Despite these concerns, the overall reaction to the car remained mostly positive, indicating that any criticisms were overshadowed by the vehicle’s appreciated qualities.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The truck received positive remarks from users like @JaBronLames, who described it as a beautiful, fully-loaded, low-mileage crew cab with a reliable engine. Several comments highlighted the high quality of the vehicle, emphasizing its well-preserved condition apparent both in pictures and video provided by the seller. The seller, @testdummypilot, expressed confidence in the truck's quality and transparency regarding the sale process, offering comprehensive imagery and a thorough description to assure potential buyers. The offer of a free three-month, 3,000-mile warranty for the new owner also added to the positive perception of the purchase experience.
Neutral: @testdummypilot acknowledged the online buying challenges and focused on building trust with potential buyers by emphasizing the family's long-standing business since 1946. The seller assured buyers about the detailed information and transparency offered in listings, as well as responsiveness to questions about the vehicle. Buyer inquiries, such as @RacnJsn95's request for additional photos and information about the engine hours, were addressed professionally, illustrating an open line of communication between the seller and interested parties.
Negative: There were minimal negative comments but concerns were raised about potential discrepancies, with @JaBronLames pointing out a mix-up regarding the vehicle identification (confusing the GMC truck with a BMW). @RacnJsn95 also highlighted a need for more information about engine hours to ensure the vehicle's condition was accurately represented given its commercial use. Despite this, the seller took these pointed feedbacks positively, addressing each concern with follow-up information and clarifications.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @zayed97 praises the vehicle's cleanliness, wishing blessings upon the buyer. @fabzfabz describes the car as a 'sick ride' with a beautiful stance, reflecting a strong appreciation for its design. @boaboyoz emphasizes the stylish nature of the C210 Skyline, calling it very cool and wishing luck to the seller. Additionally, @midnightmotorsports, the seller, expresses excitement about the car, showcasing restoration efforts in Ukraine and inviting inquiries, which reflects a positive attitude towards the sale and interaction with potential buyers.
Neutral: @Loungin112 shares curiosity regarding the boost gauge, questioning its function since the car has no turbo. The comment points out that, despite the confusion, it contributes to the overall cool 80s vibe of the vehicle. @cdscott asks about the alarm system's functionality, indicating a need for clarification on its features. @kayless requests additional images of the refurbishing process and wants documentation on the restoration, indicating interest without expressing strong opinions. @Rlee5882 inquires about the car's performance, seeking reassurance about its operational status.
Negative: @midnightmotorsports clarifies that the alarm system does not emit an audible chirp, which may suggest a less sophisticated feature. Furthermore, there is a hint of concern from @Rlee5882 regarding the vehicle's reliability, which indicates some skepticism about performance. @Loungin112's confusion about the boost gauge reflects potential concerns about the car's features and functionality. Overall, while the vehicle has many positive aspects, there are questions and doubts raised by some commenters that suggest a need for more information.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Calamari_Jujutsu praises the truck as nice, while @Beans_Bacon refers to it as blue dynamite and compliments the bronze/gold wheels as the perfect combination. @boaboyoz describes it as a beautiful Bay Blue Acty and appreciates the adorable build, wishing good luck to the seller. @VTDavid finds it pretty and highlights the vehicle's aesthetics without commenting on the photography.
Neutral: @HarrisCountyDriver mentions waiting for state clearance before purchasing the truck, indicating interest but no commitment. @jsjodin questions the legality of registering and driving the vehicle in California, to which @milage jokingly replies negatively. The seller, @Almaral949, answers questions about the original wheels being available and confirms that the vehicle's paint is not a wrap, but actual paint. They also state it is legally registered in Arizona and can assist with California registration.
Negative: @milage raises concerns about the absence of A/C controls and inquires if the vehicle is a wrap due to its interior being mostly white. @6sN7s notes a discrepancy in the A/C listing as the button is not visible in the pictures. @Erehkram asks for a driving video and information on any body work done, while requesting to see the A/C's functionality. @StovePipe82 and @Steve928 both express concerns regarding the working condition of the heat and A/C, seeking clarification on their operations.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the overall aesthetics and appeal of the 2011 BMW 328i xDrive Sports Wagon. @AugustWest mentioned that these E91 wagons are improving in appearance over time, while @Janos_z echoed this sentiment, noting that the post-facelift design has reached a level of perfection. Additionally, @Fastrack325 shared positive personal experiences with a similar model, highlighting its cleanliness and functionality as a daily driver.
Neutral: There were some clarifications and discussions about the vehicle's features, particularly concerning the seating options. @stathios (The Seller) addressed @odink9's comment regarding the sport seats, confirming that the sports package was not listed. @urgetodrive also chimed in, noting that the term 'sports wagon' is a nomenclature used by BMW, which may lead to confusion regarding the sport package.
Negative: A minor concern was raised regarding a recurring issue with the passenger seatbelt indicator, as noted by both @stathios (The Seller) and @Portenvy. This issue seems to be manageable, as @stathios explained that it can typically be resolved by fastening the seatbelt. Furthermore, @TheKrumpet inquired about whether the water pump had been replaced, hinting at potential maintenance uncertainties that could be a source of worry for prospective buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's features, particularly highlighting the Ford Performance tune, which enhances the engine's power output to outperform the standard F150 Raptor specifications. @yadayada76 emphasized that this tune comes with a factory warranty of three years or 36,000 miles, indicating confidence in its reliability and performance enhancements. Additional praise came from users who have experience with similar tunes, stating that they loved the improvements in their own trucks, bolstering the positive sentiment towards this vehicle's modifications.
Neutral: Some inquiries were made about the vehicle's modifications and the seller's decision to sell it after only a year of ownership. @Nycchi questioned the reasons for the short tenure with the vehicle, while @sikedsyko sought clarification about the engine tuning process. @Barhouma also raised practical concerns regarding the potential for stone chips, dents, and the removability of the front lights, pointing out that the vehicle has some minor cosmetic issues. The seller provided clear answers regarding the condition and modifications, which indicates transparency in the discussion.
Negative: There were concerns raised regarding the wording of the engine modification's description, as @8cylinders_short criticized it for potentially misleading phrasing by stating it was tuned to Raptor specs rather than being explicitly designed for the Ranger Raptor. @Barhouma's observation about possible stone chips and dents, coupled with the provided images, indicated an underlying anxiety among potential buyers about the truck's physical condition. Additionally, the need for plugging holes if certain modifications are reversed could deter those interested in altering the truck further.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's potential as a project car that could be transformed into a fun driver. @Basil017 and @packardv8 note that it could be an easy fix for someone handy, while @Mark_cooke describes it as a great car that is easy to work on to make it a driver standard. @TigerGary values the car's potential for driving rather than worrying about pristine condition, suggesting it can be a loved vehicle, emphasizing the strong community around these cars.
Neutral: Comments reveal a mix of curiosity and caution regarding the vehicle's condition. @koppitzkars raises questions about what specifically caused it to be non-running, while @1967Ranchero hints at its historical significance, alluding to the limited number of early black dash models. Additionally, @austinhealer and @Babadawv mention that while it has some rust and repair issues, parts are generally available, which adds to its feasibility as a restoration project.
Negative: Several commenters express concerns regarding the car's condition and the amount of work needed. @austinhealer notes extensive rust and dubious repairs, while @Albert-Blue cautions that the car might not be as easy to restore as others suggest. @Warren critiques the quality of the paint job and suggests it may be a cover-up for deeper issues, adding a note of caution for potential buyers about the reality of restoring such a vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @FrankDelgado praises the 2021 Z4 as a highly underrated practical sports car that handles excellently and is quite comfortable for long rides. He notes the vehicle's construction on BMW’s CLAR platform, resembling a 3 series in a more compact form. @patrickongena shares a positive experience with his 2019 Z4, emphasizing its rarity and the satisfaction he derives from driving it while suggesting potential buyers will be pleased based on the car's reviews. @BidRunner (The Seller) mentions that the Z4 is a joy to drive and commits to providing videos showcasing its features, further amplifying its allure.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about specific features and documentation pertaining to the vehicle. @mtmA2 requests additional trunk photos, while @tp808 and @amontes99 ask about the promised videos demonstrating the car's functionality, including the convertible top's operation. @H-Hill expresses interest in personally viewing the vehicle, indicating a common query among potential buyers regarding the car's in-person availability and exploration before bidding.
Negative: @Buffalofan raises concerns regarding the service records, specifically requesting more detailed status updates on crucial features such as the brakes, suspension, and fluid conditions. Although the seller, @BidRunner, responds assertively by stating that the vehicle has been regularly serviced and has no issues, the request still highlights a perceived gap in transparency that potential buyers may view unfavorably. This indicates some uncertainty in the minds of potential bidders regarding the comprehensiveness of the vehicle's service history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @bucksters69caddy describes the car as awesome and perfectly fitting for his lifestyle, expressing a desire to bid on it if circumstances allowed. @mark_99 finds it to ooze character and appreciates the incremental improvements made by previous caretakers without a full-scale restoration, adding that the motor sounds healthy and the gear changes are smooth. Other users like @Rocketshoes and @frnloth praise the vehicle for its unique aesthetic and history, with @Rocketshoes stating he loves how it tells a story and @frnloth acknowledging that such a cool MGA stands out among beautifully restored models.
Neutral: @996guy (The Seller) provides detailed responses to questions about the car's history, noting that the axle seals and oil burning issues have been resolved. He shares information about the car's construction, mentioning that the bonnet, trunk, and doors are aluminum with steel frames, while the front valence is fiberglass. When questioned about the paint, he explains that it has "patina," which gives it a distinctive character, and encourages potential buyers to review photos from previous auctions for more insight.
Negative: @Reg expresses disdain for the car's current "bad boy rat rod" appearance, implying it needs modifications such as an MGB engine transplant for better performance. @Billbagley's comment about a possible spray paint job raises concerns about the car's quality. The overall sentiment is that while many appreciate the car's charm and character, others feel it lacks the performance enhancements typical for such classic vehicles, as mentioned by various commenters.
2020 Ford F-150 Saleen Yellow Label Supercharged Sportruck
1FTMF1C52LKE02463
Lot 190177
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments regarding the vehicle highlight some amusing remarks, such as @sy1616's quip about Saleen and gasoline, noting how people often mispronounce it. There are also inquiries about warranty details which seem to indicate confidence in the vehicle's condition and maintenance history, particularly from @Steve3178 asking if there is any warranty left on the truck. These comments suggest that there is a level of interest and appreciation for the vehicle's features and potential.
Neutral: Several technical specifications were shared by @newcarpro, featuring detailed components and attributes of the vehicle. Such details included axle ratios, engine type, and various equipment breakdowns which might serve potential buyers in understanding the vehicle's technical strengths. Additionally, questions about viewing the vehicle, like from @Americanmotors, reflect a neutral stance on the vehicle's desirability, focusing more on logistics.
Negative: While there isn't an overtly negative sentiment expressed in the comments, the repeated technical codes and equipment absence noted by @newcarpro could imply potential buyers may find the vehicle lacking certain features they desire. Moreover, without explicit positive endorsements or reviews from users, there could be a sense of hesitation about buying something that entails numerous technical specifications but lacks personal experience anecdotes.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @grb1 praised the VFR800 for its superb handling and desirability, highlighting its fantastic qualities as a sport cruiser. @Al_Loco (The Seller) noted the bike's exceptional power, versatility, and comfort, describing the thrilling sound when the VTEC kicks in. @johncfarrisjr complimented the bike as a beautiful example, expressing enthusiasm for the brand, and @dgl1325 shared fond memories of owning the same model, emphasizing its fantastic performance. @Rick968 also spoke highly of the VFR, recalling his experiences with it as his first bike and noting its suitability as a sport/tour bike.
Neutral: @Al_Loco (The Seller) provided a description of the bike, mentioning a few small cosmetic blemishes, including a scratch on the tank and spots on the windscreen, which potential buyers should be aware of. The seller encouraged inspections and was open to additional inquiries, showing a willingness to assist interested parties. Discussions about shipping options and the bike's legality in California were also addressed, reflecting the seller's commitment to transparency during the auction process.
Negative: Comments regarding the VFR800's conditions revealed minor concerns, with @Superbe questioning whether the bike would be suitable for a beginner. @tommyboy34 suggested the need for an aftermarket exhaust system, hinting at a potential lack of performance or sound compared to modified versions. Further, @Rick968 expressed regret at not being able to bid due to prohibitive shipping costs from the west coast, highlighting a barrier for some potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Beans_Bacon expressed delight at the vehicle with comments like "Love it!" and "It’s that perfect," indicating strong enthusiasm. @Casey85j, the seller, affirmed the vehicle's quality, describing it as a "VERY high quality build" that embodies both form and function. Several other users like @GDogg and @slowinthedriveway praised its aesthetics, referring to it as probably the best Jimmy seen recently and a "beautiful truck," with compliments on its black paint and plaid interior. Overall, the comments reflect a consensus that this GMC Jimmy is a stunning and high-quality vehicle that stands out.
Neutral: @jthillia130 inquired about the hard top, showing a practical interest in understanding more about the vehicle's specifications, while @Stapescrew had questions about the white object behind the grill and requested additional information on the engine. Additionally, @K51020Ranch asked for pictures of the body mount areas, suggesting a need for verification of the vehicle's condition. @Casey85j, as the seller, responded to these queries, providing details and promising to supply extra photos, indicating transparency in the sale process.
Negative: Some comments suggested caution regarding the vehicle's use. @Scott68GTO mentioned feeling "uncomfortable taking her off road" due to its beauty, reflecting a concern that its pristine condition is more suited for show rather than rugged use. @K51020Ranch pointed out that it does not seem to have undergone a frame-off restoration, implying possible worries about the extent of the vehicle's refurbishment. These comments hint at a perception of the truck being more of a collector's item than a practical vehicle for all terrains.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the vehicle's aesthetics and performance, highlighting its balanced proportions and desirability. @Boatymcboatface notes that these cars are rarely seen, calling this particular example nice. @AlohaZ3 expresses admiration for the vehicle's profile, describing it as 'to die for' and labeling it as nice looking. @fabzfabz adds to the compliments by calling the Audi Cabriolet beautiful and classic. Additionally, @benznotmercedes praises the driving experience of such vehicles, mentioning the joy that it brings to drivers. Overall, there is a strong sense of admiration for the vehicle's design and driving capability among these comments.
Neutral: Commenter @idling mentions that the car looks pretty good considering its mileage of approximately 193,000. They note the appealing paint color without expressing any strong feelings either way about its overall condition or desirability. Similarly, @rTillery finds the car beautiful and inquires about its capability for long-distance travel, reflecting a general interest in the car's reliability and maintenance without expressing definite enthusiasm or criticism. @eurocollector53 (The Seller) addresses the audience, affirming confidence in the car's performance for long trips, while also inviting questions, which seems to foster an open dialogue around the vehicle.
Negative: However, there are discrepancies noted about the vehicle's transmission type, creating some concern among potential buyers. @exS6owner questions the accuracy of the listing, claiming the Cabriolets never came with a 4-speed manual transmission, which contradicts the description provided. @VolvoguyKC echoes this concern and points out that the vehicle is instead an automatic, leading to confusion. This mistake prompted a response from @bringatrailer, who acknowledged the error and indicated that it had been corrected. Therefore, the mixed reactions also highlight a need for more clarity regarding the car's specifications.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @rbgerrish praised the vehicle as beautiful, expressing excitement about having a 1984 model to accompany their 1985 version. @Mikeura commented on the coolness of the truck and inquired about the dimensions of the rear box, indicating a positive take on its features. @Crazy_Canadian offered a humorous suggestion about adding a hot tub in the back, highlighting the vehicle's fun potential. Overall, several commenters appreciated the truck's design and versatility for various activities, suggesting it could be useful for events like races or sports meets.
Neutral: There were inquiries about various specifics regarding the vehicle's functionality and condition. @willy asked for the dimensions of the rear and passenger areas, and whether the divider could be removed, showing practical interest in the vehicle’s layout. @carlivar raised questions regarding the title and registration process, noting discrepancies in the auction description while pointing out that the seller hadn't yet responded to rapidly accumulating questions. @mmmpmurphy, the seller, provided clarification about the absence of a smog requirement for older diesel vehicles and mentioned that current tags are indeed valid, suggesting transparency in communication.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism or concern about the vehicle's status and condition. @carlivar expressed confusion over how the vehicle could have current tags if it couldn't be sold to in-state buyers, while @spadpilot questioned how a 'clean' title was acquired, implying potential legal or regulatory issues. Additionally, @willy urged the seller for a video demonstrating the vehicle's functionality, pointing to a lack of clarity surrounding the truck's current operational status, especially noting that the tires are over ten years old.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments generally speak highly of the S2000, with multiple users praising its beauty and uniqueness. @shamma1977 calls it beautiful, while @letthegypsyhaveit expresses a strong preference for this older model over newer Honda cars. @TheDudeAbides2 shares a fondness for the color and mentions interesting mods along with the cleanliness of the vehicle. Many commenters show nostalgia for the S2000s, noting their exceptional build quality and style compared to newer Honda models. @Allstate72 notes the rarity of the yellow variant, bringing smiles to its owners, and @Davew expresses excitement as he anticipates the arrival of his own yellow S2000, driven by the brand's reputation for longevity.
Neutral: The seller, @krishraja, provides detailed information about the S2000's condition and service history. He mentions his reluctance to part with the car but is being encouraged by his partner to sell it due to space constraints with his new Civic Type-R. He reassures potential buyers of the car's maintenance, having performed regular oil changes and other service tasks. Comments regarding specific modifications, such as the aftermarket exhaust and heated seats, clarify doubts, while @DaxtroseMorgan asks for a driving video, which the seller agrees to provide, showing openness to engage with prospective buyers.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the car's condition, particularly regarding the soft top and paint damage estimates. @Spiffydeezy estimates around $5-6k to replace the soft top and repair paint damage, prompting @krishraja to mention estimated costs for replacements and refinishing, which he had obtained from local shops. Additionally, some comments reflect apprehension about seating comfort for taller drivers, with @Valiantjim sharing personal experiences illustrating challenges in long-distance driving and comfort. This suggests that while the S2000 is beloved, it may not suit everyone perfectly, particularly for those seeking more comfort on longer journeys.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the Lambretta SX150 for its aesthetic appeal and nostalgic charm. @GBRBiLL expressed enthusiasm, calling it 'cute' and wishing the seller luck with the sale. @GBC_Collection highlighted the scooter's versatility and fun factor, noting its professional restoration and unique design. @Slam105 pointed out its higher desirability in Europe compared to the Vespa, praising Lambretta's engineering and stylish design, and many acknowledged its historical significance in the scooter community.
Neutral: Several comments reflected on the scooter's practical features and performance. @GBC_Collection provided a detailed explanation of the scooter's capabilities, indicating that it performs modestly in urban environments with a top speed of 45-50 mph. Comments also included requests for additional information, such as photos of the undercarriage from @jshildebrandt, and inquiries about its performance on hilly terrains from @joeson1234. The discussion about the scooter's sidecar placement and the unit's restoration sparked dialogue regarding its design and usability.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters raised concerns about the scooter's performance and functionality. @neilpierson25 recounted a negative experience with a Lambretta from the 1960s, where frequent starting issues led to his brother's frustration. @JiveMiguel questioned the incorrect sidecar mounting and the use of a km/hr speedometer, expressing confusion regarding its restoration in the US. @ESF mentioned potential underpowering when carrying passengers, indicating that while aesthetically pleasing, the scooter might not meet every rider's practical needs.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed a lot of admiration for the truck, with @MassCash978 calling it beautiful, and @dougbrown and @OLDMANJ reminiscing about their own experiences with Lightning trucks, praising their reliability and history. @OLDMANJ mentioned how much the prices have increased over time, and expressed a desire to own one again. @z28th1s also appreciated the beauty of the truck, noting his past experience with a black '94 model that had a supercharger, which made it even more enjoyable to drive. Overall, many recognize the truck's aesthetic and legacy as a standout vehicle in its category.
Neutral: @Willzee (The Seller) provided comprehensive details regarding modifications to the truck, specifically the removal of a body kit, which required a repaint due to holes left behind. He clarified the type of paint used, mentioning that it was PPG pure black, base/clear, and that the work was performed by Randy’s Customs. This additional context helped clarify any concerns raised by potential buyers regarding the repaint and the truck's condition. @Willzee also invited further inquiries through the 'Contact Seller' button, indicating his openness to questions.
Negative: Skepticism was present in some comments regarding the necessity of the complete repaint after removing the body kit, with @DLVRYMN questioning the decision and wondering about the costs involved. @Hmrdown also sought clarification on the repaint specifics, including door jams and pricing. @gary21sn's query about the body kit removal indicated a desire for more information, suggesting that not all potential buyers were entirely satisfied with the information provided. This reflects a level of uncertainty about the repaint's justification and thoroughness.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Hazmat06 expressed their admiration stating it is a beautiful example of the vehicle. Similarly, @NSXFan76 highlighted the rarity of the Berlina Black/Tan combination, noting it is 1 of only 28 in that color for 2002, and only 1 of 8 with a manual transmission. @Sjo praised the rarity of the camel interior on the facelift cars, describing it as a beautiful contrast to the black exterior. @boaboyoz echoed these sentiments, calling it an exquisite example and wishing it luck on its sale. Commenters like @Oldhockyplayr found the offering spectacular due to its color combination and low mileage. Overall, many commentators expressed great appreciation for the car's aesthetic and performance.
Neutral: The seller, @robashroy, provided detailed answers regarding the vehicle’s condition, including its background and recent maintenance history. They mentioned that they are offering the car due to lifestyle changes and emphasized its low mileage of 40,000. @xraydelta1 inquired about the alternator replacement, to which the seller confirmed it was precautionary. Other commenters, such as @almostthere99 and @wild_turkey, discussed the two-tone black and tan interior, with @m31 mentioning a potential issue with the rear fender liner, prompting follow-up questions about the car's overall condition, paint meter readings, and any possible damage.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's condition. @m31 specifically questioned whether there was any issue behind the driver side rear tire, while @MaxKarg raised issues regarding the brake light, tail light condensation, and wear on the engine cover, pointing out potential repairs needed. @theking noted deformation in the rear fender liner, questioning if it needed replacement. @Flyautoworks mentioned the look of something potentially having lived in the engine bay, prompting concerns about wiring damage. Although @robashroy addressed some concerns, he confirmed a water issue with the tail light, suggesting it might need replacement, which could entail additional costs for the buyer.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the unique appeal of the Shiro Special Z31, with @zdoctor expressing love for its aesthetic and nostalgic 1980s feel. @GDogg reminisces about encountering a similarly styled vehicle in Fort Lauderdale, while @AKconquest believes the Shiro is the best-looking Z31. The enthusiasm is echoed by @rmp5s, who is eager about the availability of the Shiro Specials, showing a shared enthusiasm among enthusiasts. @z31_Kouki, the seller, mentions his dedication to the car, revealing he has owned it since September 2024 and enjoys participating in car meets, further emphasizing the model's community appeal.
Neutral: Several comments include factual discussions around the production numbers and specifications of the Shiro Special. @z31_Kouki clarifies that there were 1,077 units produced, with 1,002 designated for the US, leading @zdoctor to share insights about its rarity and value in the Japanese market. @TheZ31Hunter provides historical context on the car, confirming its unique characteristics and production specifications, while @bermudaboy delves into the potential for restoration and maintenance of specific components like the seats and air dam. Overall, there is a collective sharing of knowledge about the Shiro's place in automotive history.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly the alignment of the hood noted by @rmp5s, who refers to it as crooked. @wade9111 also inquires about potential issues with rust and the overall condition of the car, seeking clarity on various mechanical aspects. @suprpacman points out similar alignment issues on the hood, suggesting that adjustments are needed. @bermudaboy expresses skepticism about the possibility of effectively repairing the air dam, urging for a more thorough restoration rather than superficial fixes. These concerns highlight the complexities of maintaining vintage vehicles, especially ones as revered as the Shiro Special.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CarmanUSA2025 describes the vehicle as a 'beast,' suitable for any adventurous context, likening it to a 'mad max worthy machine.' @mohlster appreciates the build and expresses interest in learning more about the truck's performance, particularly regarding brake issues, indicating respect for its craftsmanship. @CarDogThreePedals admires the truck's audacity, suggesting it commands attention on the road, while @cascadia shares their enthusiasm for the construction skills involved, implying that the build quality is exceptional.
Neutral: @Onlyfords (The Seller) provides detailed responses to inquiries about the vehicle, confirming that the brakes are rebuilt and in good working condition, and explains that the truck has a top speed of around 55 mph. They share insights about the truck's history, emphasizing that it was well preserved, having no rust or dents, and that various components like the steering box and water pump have been replaced, which adds to the truck's performance.
Negative: Although none of the comments express outright negativity, there is a hint of concern from @mohlster regarding potential brake issues based on their experience with a similar vehicle, suggesting possible vulnerabilities. @TGRSparkplug asks technical questions about cargo capacity and gear ratios, pointing to a desire for clarity that may imply a level of caution or uncertainty in the vehicle's specifications. Overall, the lack of direct criticism suggests a generally positive reception, while also acknowledging the need for more technical information.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments indicate that the vehicle, a BMW k1200rs, is in outstanding condition, particularly given its age and mileage. @alexg182 (The Seller) expresses confidence in the bike's excellent performance and maintenance history, describing it as having been well-kept and suggesting it is ready for long-distance travel without hesitation. The seller also notes their familiarity with the bike's previous owner, which adds credibility to its quality and care over the years.
Neutral: Inquiries about specific features and details of the BMW k1200rs have been made by potential buyers. @ACMOTO raised a question about the maintenance of the ABS system, a common concern for such bikes, and the seller assured them that there are no current ABS issues. @BMWMPaul asked for information regarding the tire date codes and tread condition, to which @alexg182 mentioned the tires have fair tread but could not provide the date codes at that time due to being away from home.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the maintenance history of certain components, especially the ABS system, which can be prone to issues as bikes age. Though @alexg182 mentioned that there are no current ABS concerns, the inherent nature of potential problems may still worry buyers. Additionally, without knowing the tire date codes, there could be doubts about the overall safety and reliability of the tires, which could deter some potential bidders.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors like @ggperformance and @1lotus1 herald the vehicle as a dream and an amazing car, appreciating its performance and attributes. @Cpk1219 expresses that there is no other car more satisfying to drive than a 991.2 GT3 6 speed. @letthegypsyhaveit calls it stunning, while others, like @boaboyoz and @analogdrive, showcase their admiration for the color and build quality, noting that it's a beauty, especially in the Chalk color. @Benoit25 shares details showcasing the vehicle's excellent maintenance, including lack of overrevs and minimal wear, which adds to the vehicle's appeal for potential buyers. The community support and interest in the car's unique design and features highlight its desirability.
Neutral: Many comments focus on seeking specific details about the car, with users like @Payden1986 and @Jmassey03 asking about PPF (Paint Protection Film) and the condition of various components. @Jmassey03 inquires about potential rock chips and general upkeep, demonstrating a cautious interest. Similarly, @mkat32 queries about track incidents during the car's history, indicating that potential buyers are looking for reassurance regarding its performance and safety. @begabtli also raises questions surrounding the car’s service history, while others note aspects like tire information and maintenance record inquiries typical for prospective buyers looking for transparency.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback, some comments touch on concerns. @begabtli raises questions about service records, suggesting a lack of documentation in Carfax during the owner's time, which might worry some buyers. @austinrace brings up the issue of rear LED light errors and misalignment in the rear lid as points for concern, suggesting a possible need for adjustments that have not been addressed by the seller. Furthermore, @jerzeyboy730 expresses a desire for more detailed photographs of the vehicle's underside and functionality, indicating a level of apprehension regarding the condition of parts not visible in standard images.
|
|