Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's beauty and design, with @Niteroi calling it the prettiest of all Superleggeras. @JettJolene described it as superb eye candy, while @danz76 simply remarked, "Ufff, gorgeous." The bike is perceived as a desirable and stunning piece, with comments highlighting its aesthetics and rarity, particularly in the context of the Ducati Superleggera compared to other models.
Neutral: Some users raised questions about the bike's modifications and maintenance, with @laknee88 inquiring about the delete of the mirrors and any other adjustments made. @MichaelVera (The Seller) responded by detailing the modifications and confirming that the bike was fully serviced in 2023. @Harossi and @Meccanica engaged in a discussion about the comparability and rideability of the Superleggera versus the Desmosedici, indicating varied personal preferences based on riding experiences.
Negative: There were no explicitly negative comments about the vehicle itself; however, @Harossi noted the differences between the Superleggera and the Desmosedici, suggesting the latter might provide a superior riding experience for those seeking performance over aesthetics. Additionally, @JettJolene commented on how many of these machines are purchased more as display items than for actual riding, which could imply a lack of practical use or concerns about the bike's utility in certain contexts.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @enbritton praised the vehicle's beautiful condition, highlighting the Rhodium Silver color and the combination with Carrera Classic Wheels, enhancing its appearance. @kT2017, the seller, confirmed that the entire front of the car has PPF (Paint Protection Film) for added durability and shared that the car was CPO’d and regularly maintained at Porsche Calgary, offering reassurance about its care and upkeep. Additionally, comments indicated that features such as the ability to switch the unit of measurement from kilometers to miles were beneficial, suggesting adaptability for potential U.S. buyers.
Neutral: The seller, @kT2017, engaged with commenters to clarify various aspects of the car, such as the last service performed on the vehicle and the advice on importing the car into the U.S. They addressed details about the physical features of the car, such as the Escort Max Ci controller installed below the tachometer, and provided information regarding the car's maintenance status. There were also questions about tariffs and compliance for importing the vehicle, with responses from multiple users like @longmirenk and @Macattack56 sharing insights based on their research on tariffs and regulations.
Negative: Several commenters expressed concerns regarding the challenges involved in importing the vehicle, including the potential 28% tariff mentioned by @longmirenk and @Macattack56, which could complicate the purchasing process for U.S. buyers. Additionally, @911looker's inquiry about any liens on the car added a layer of uncertainty about the ownership status. Commenters were also seeking confirmation on the complex tariff implications, indicating a broader confusion about import regulations related to a used car manufactured in 2014.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and performance. @Mgh20180 mentioned the F-Type's center exit exhaust, calling it a gorgeous automobile. @Stevelovescars shared a positive experience from a 2000-mile trip, praising the car's comfort, efficiency, and thrilling driving experience, emphasizing the need for these cars to be driven. @JoeyTheAsian (The Seller) highlighted the F-Type's reliability and affordability to maintain, calling it an incredible bargain compared to other luxury cars, while also expressing his hope that the car will go to a fellow enthusiast who will appreciate it.
Neutral: Several commenters asked questions or made neutral remarks about the car's specifications and features. @Ajj62 inquired about how the sticky button issue was solved, receiving a detailed explanation from @JoeyTheAsian (The Seller). Other comments included @ReddingRed's opinion about the car’s beauty being overshadowed by its marketing, and @SLVR1's questions about the trunk space, which @JoeyTheAsian assured can accommodate luggage for trips. The discussion included technical aspects like the rear differential upgrade, demonstrating a mix of curiosity and practicality about owning such a car.
Negative: There were a few negative or critical comments regarding the overall presentation and marketing of the vehicle. @M3_Driver suggested improvements in presentation, such as cleaning the motor and vacuuming the carpet to enhance the car's attractiveness. @ReddingRed expressed dissatisfaction with the latest marketing campaign for Jaguars, indicating a disconnect between brand image and personal preference. While these comments didn’t deter from the car's overall appeal, they highlighted areas where potential buyers felt improvements could be made.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly noting its association with TunerCult and its remarkable condition. @Willweber highlighted the engine compartment, calling it 'to die for,' while @boaboyoz praised the R34 Skyline GT-R as a 'spectacular' and 'stunning specimen.' The seller, @SteamSquad, also emphasized transparency and thorough preparations for the sale, assuring potential bidders of the car's legitimacy and maintenance history. Commenters like @signalpuke and @nexusautobrokers echoed enthusiasm for the vehicle, with @nexusautobrokers stating it was a 'great car' and congratulating the seller on sharing it.
Neutral: Several participants engaged in a discussion regarding the vehicle's history and modifications. @Tanmay78 confirmed the vehicle's identity from TunerCult and acknowledged that it was valued due to its modifications, suggesting it could be worth around $115,000. The seller provided updates on the car's condition and historical details, stating that it had been tested comprehensively, with all results positive. Commenters raised various inquiries, including those related to documentation and modifications, including @Futherium asking about horsepower and brake conditions, which the seller addressed, reinforcing the vehicle's readiness for sale and reliability.
Negative: Some comments indicated skepticism regarding the seller's credibility and the auction's validity. @severx13 questioned the transparency of the sale, suggesting that the seller should provide more information on the TunerCult giveaway to alleviate potential concerns from bidders. @baronobeefdip offered constructive criticism, recommending that the seller be more accommodating to inquiries about the vehicle rather than taking them personally. Further doubts were raised by @AlpineFD, who requested documentation proving it was imported as a complete vehicle and not as parts, highlighting a concern over its history that the seller attempted to clarify.
Twin-Turbocharged 416-Powered 2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS RS Coupe
2G1FK1EJ4A9129144
Lot 190191
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters praised the car's quality and features, expressing admiration for its performance. @Phillip_Shaffer referred to it as a 'nice car,' while @Beans_Bacon expressed a strong desire to own it, wishing good luck with the auction. @Lurch_Camaro (The Seller) shared insights into the Camaro's capabilities, highlighting its drag strip readiness while remaining drivable and comfortable on the street. The mention of various renowned designers and engineers from the Camaro's development providing their signatures on the car further enhanced its appeal.
Neutral: There were several inquiries regarding specifics about the vehicle, indicating a serious interest from potential buyers. @Jeepwayoflife asked about the ignition system and the fuel cell's operating condition. @LexusFanboy questioned its street legality, and @BootFubarski brought up the certification of the roll cage, which @Lurch_Camaro confirmed had not been completed but stated it met NHRA requirements for safety. There were also clarifications made related to emissions compliance and how modifications could affect registration based on local laws.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the car's condition and performance. @Jeepwayoflife noted that the stock transmission might struggle with the high levels of power, urging for potential upgrades. @Lurch_Camaro (The Seller) admitted that the transmission was the weak link and suggested that those racing frequently might consider a different setup to enhance durability. Additionally, there were mentions of the age of some tires and the need for replacements to ensure optimal performance, indicating that while the car is impressive, certain aspects may require attention for competitive use.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @rpNY146 complimented Peter of Motor Car Garage for his tech expertise and noted that the MGB is a great vehicle, wishing good luck with the auction. @bachldrs highlighted the car's excellent pedigree and quality of work done by respected figures in the MG community, praising specific modifications like the Datsun 280Z five-speed implementation. @jags_in_the_barn found the MGB well presented, indicating it's a fantastic option for immediate enjoyment and expressing appreciation for the overall detailing and aesthetics.
Neutral: @MedicGT4 (The Seller) revealed that since the last auction, the convertible top has been replaced, and front bushings are included for installation as part of the sale. Multiple commenters requested additional media, such as driving and cold start videos, to better illustrate the car's performance. @Gossir00 provided constructive feedback about the typical expectations for a cold start video, which was acknowledged humorously by @MedicGT4.
Negative: Some users like @tdenson3 experienced difficulties viewing videos associated with the sale of the vehicle, which may have hindered their ability to assess the car fully. @bachldrs mentioned that detailing in the engine bay could be improved, whereas another user speculated if certain modifications might be excessive for the car's stock design. Overall, while there are minor concerns about the aesthetic and video quality, the general feedback remains largely positive.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg describes the Vespa Ciao as very cool, while @OldGuy appreciates the charm of the vehicle by commenting on a brochure related to it, calling it a riot. @PhilNiekro also shares a humorous take, stating that the brochure alone is worth the price of admission, further emphasizing the vehicle's appeal. @Enzo.Ferrari adds to the positivity by highlighting the unique experience of riding a Piaggio Ciao, asserting it allows riders to casually claim they ride a hardtail daily, thus elevating its worth.
Neutral: @richmg (The Seller) greets potential buyers and emphasizes that the auction listing and video illustrate the condition of the 1969 Vespa Ciao. He encourages interested parties to ask questions if they need more details. He later clarifies that the moped has a single-speed transmission, which could be interpreted as automatic but does not change gears. @Mhawke inquires about the seat height adjustability, to which @richmg (The Seller) responds that it is not adjustable.
Negative: While most comments are positive or neutral, there are no significant negative remarks captured in the provided commentary. @skyancherisafraud expresses enthusiasm with comments like "wow! so hottttt" and "wow wow wow," but these do not constitute negative feedback.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's unique Quicksand color, considering it a standout and a hard-to-find option. @cvmohr confirmed that the color is indeed factory, specifically for the 2016 TRD Pro model. @IMAGINETHAT and @MattGraf shared their love for this color, noting its rarity, and @wsgoat highlighted the model as a future classic due to its rugged looks and factory capability. Commenters like @Calamari_Jujutsu praised the vehicle as an absolute masterpiece, recounting experiences with similar models that survived substantial mileage with minimal issues. Overall, there is a clear appreciation for the design and reliability of the 4Runner.
Neutral: There was some discussion about the vehicle's ownership history. @freedom_nate raised a question about the discrepancy in the Carfax report indicating two owners, to which @lferreiro responded, clarifying that the dealership was the first owner and he is the second. This sparked a conversation about the potential inaccuracies of Carfax records, as @TNB8 mentioned discrepancies can sometimes occur. Additionally, there were inquiries about the condition of the vehicle, with @Audipwr1 suggesting that the tires might need replacement, indicating a mixture of positive feedback alongside practical concerns.
Negative: Not all responses were entirely positive, as some participants raised concerns about specific details. @IMAGINETHAT pointed out a fluid under the vehicle in a video, questioning if it was condensation, which @lferreiro confirmed it was. @nnciderr inquired about the functionality of the diff lock and 4WD system, asking if there had been any issues with engagement, which @lferreiro assured hadn't been a problem during his ownership. Additionally, @since78 flagged a comment as non-constructive while still acknowledging the vehicle's beauty, suggesting a mixed reception among the commenters.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have praised the S500 for its immaculate condition and elegance. @GDogg and @Softal expressed admiration, with @Sdaffre highlighting the impressive technology for a vehicle from 30 years ago. The seller, @romanol, engaged with the audience by offering to answer questions and arrange test drives, showcasing confidence in the car's maintenance and performance.
Neutral: Several comments indicated interest in the vehicle, including requests for additional information. @jeffjaguar4 inquired about the functionality of the remote keys, to which @romanol responded with clarification about their status. @Mrhoppy also requested service history, which @romanol addressed by directing him to the Carfax report that details the vehicle's maintenance history, emphasizing its good condition after limited use.
Negative: On the downside, some comments raised concerns, particularly @Mrhoppy's note about the lack of recent service history documentation, which could concern potential buyers. While @romanol attempted to alleviate these concerns by detailing the vehicle's past and mentioning its limited use since 2014, the absence of comprehensive service records remains a point of contention for some viewers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have praised the overall condition of the vehicle, highlighting its originality and low mileage. @ctom3 expresses enthusiasm over the bike's clean and original state, appreciating its upgrades while mentioning that it doesn't need further modifications due to their riding style. @Ant5842 and @bobofohio both compliment the bike's pristine condition and originality, with the latter commenting on the perfect amount of patina that makes it manageable for potential buyers. @UnionGarageNYC (The Seller) emphasizes the bike's historical significance, noting the expert care it received and its low mileage, making it a 'cool original example' with potential for future rides.
Neutral: There are several comments questioning the bike's details and upkeep. @BillSchrade brings up concerns about the paint and whether it has been repainted, while @originalbob offers a perspective that the paint looks OEM based on the photos provided, but acknowledges there may be some uncertainty about certain features like the tank logos. @buellwinkle mentions the importance of knowing if the rear main seal has been replaced, indicating potential issues with oil leaks, while @Tekreck comments on the bike's clamps and whether they meet collector standards. The seller provides detailed responses, addressing painting techniques and the originality of parts, while keeping the tone informative and engaging.
Negative: A few commenters raised concerns about potential issues with the vehicle. @buellwinkle expresses apprehension regarding the original rear main seal, potentially leading to oil leaks on long rides, hinting at the risk involved with purchasing without a thorough inspection. @Tekreck also notes the importance of original components for collectors, identifying the need for authenticity in parts like the clamps, which suggests that alterations may affect collector interest. Some users worry about the bike's extended periods of sitting, which could have led to mechanical issues like hardened grease in bearings, as mentioned by @bmwsrw, who warns that these models are not meant to sit unused for long periods, echoing concerns about the motorcycle's age-related maintenance.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed overwhelming admiration for the 454 SS, describing it as an "amazing truck" and a "time capsule" that beautifully represents the 1990s era. @Kevinkroll and @fastlp reflect on the exceptional condition of the vehicle, with @BuffaloJim praising its aesthetics and @boaboyoz calling it an exemplary example. Many highlight its rarity and low mileage, with @MPreston454 pondering whether to drive it or simply admire it. The truck is noted for its striking black color and design features, which remind commenters of a nostalgic automotive past.
Neutral: Some comments center around practical considerations, with @carfan1978 discussing fuel economy and the truck's original MSRP, while others, including @Ricklish and @CaddyLT4, inquired about the vehicle's history and condition. The seller, @collectordriven, addressed these inquiries, mentioning the lack of a Carfax report and the truck's original maintenance within a climate-controlled environment. Additionally, there were comments on the truck's features and the current functionality of its components, with @stevenanastos asking about the state of the A/C and other electrical systems. Overall, reactions to these details reflect curiosity about a classic vehicle's operation rather than just its appearance.
Negative: Amidst the praise, there are some criticisms of the 454 SS. @OldGuy pointed out the vehicle's performance limitations, suggesting that its speed is primarily felt in gas consumption rather than acceleration. Others noted the truck's low horsepower output of 230, with @pennyCollector finding it strange for a 7.4-liter V8 engine and @blue_car_club humorously remarking on the expected fuel economy. @Ricklish further raised concerns about a potential vibration issue, implying it may detract from the driving experience. Additionally, comments addressed cosmetic imperfections, such as a paint chip and issues with the digital climate control display mentioned by @gauldingr.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @KevinK praises the vehicle's aesthetics, noting that the Turbo II wheels look striking in black, a detail he wishes Porsche had implemented for the 997 'Black Edition.' @Balr14 shares a similar sentiment, stating that the convertible top's wear is normal and can easily be improved with treatment, highlighting the durability and reliability of the model. Meanwhile, @vikes8411 expresses a friendly sentiment towards the seller and their location, suggesting a potential meet-up to offer an independent opinion on the car.
Neutral: @kp29283 requests clarity regarding the inspection report's date, the damage mentioned on the soft top, and a cold start video, to which @Knowsbetter (The Seller) responds with reassurance about the report and the condition of the soft top, providing further clarification and additional videos. @Jon_Kokomo raises concerns about the paint match on the front end where refinishing occurred and asks about any potential damage when removing paint protection film, which the seller answers by stating all looks good and that the repair was expertly executed.
Negative: @McGregor16 points out that a current service is required since the last service was noted as done in April, raising concerns about the vehicle's drive belt, which tends to have issues after 60k miles. @Knowsbetter (The Seller) confirms the need for a service but finds no current operational issues with the vehicle, attempting to alleviate further concerns. Overall, while the comments reveal some weaknesses, the seller addresses them consistently to maintain confidence in the vehicle's condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @cdwatnsu emphasizes that despite potential issues, the E320 is still a durable model compared to newer cars, suggesting it will outlast them. @Luz_do_sol describes the vehicle as well-kept, noting its appealing exterior and interior condition, which shows the previous owners cared for it. They believe that the next owner will be satisfied with the purchase, particularly because of the low mileage and the no-reserve auction format. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) reassures bidders that the vehicle functions properly, with all systems, including AC, sunroof, and engine, working as intended, indicating it has been well-maintained.
Neutral: @Cireisa questions the seller's expectations regarding the car's value, hinting that it may not meet the previous listing's price. @yujistan discusses the auction's no-reserve aspect and suggests that transparency regarding any needed inspections could increase bids. @Stentr expresses concerns about the unknowns associated with this vehicle, mentioning another model that had more service records, indicating that further inspection and assurance are necessary before bidding.
Negative: @Sheffield raises a concern about the wiring harness, suggesting it is an issue that needs to be addressed for potential buyers. @AussieBenz points to outdated tires and the absence of information regarding known problems, warning that buyers should expect additional investment to bring the car to decent condition. @Jonfrancis mentions potential issues with the wiring harness and brake condition, questioning if these have been checked, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the vehicle's overall quality.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Rover03 (The Seller) expresses a deep appreciation for the Land Rover vehicles, having owned several over the years. They particularly admire the Disco 2's color combination, low mileage, and overall condition. The seller mentions that a thorough detailing was done shortly after purchase, which helped maintain the vehicle's appearance and ease of maintenance. They also highlight that the car performed reliably during a long drive from Portland to Santa Rosa, suggesting confidence in its mechanical integrity.
Neutral: @Rover03 (The Seller) acknowledges minor damage that was not disclosed by the previous owner, including scratches likely caused by an underground garage's low ceiling. They also note that the car is not currently registered but is insured, prompting @rgman98 to raise the concern of California smog regulations for potential buyers. @BidderBuyer praises the availability of documents, manuals, and work invoices, while also inquiring about specific concerns regarding the vehicle's installation and potential leaks.
Negative: @Scottedwards3 recalls their own experience with the same model, stating it was frequently in the shop for repairs, leading to frustration despite moments of enjoyment when it functioned correctly. @kriskrispy raises a concern about the coolant's condition in a video, while @BidderBuyer points out that there were issues noted on a service invoice regarding the steering box installation, indicating a possible flaw that requires attention. Overall, there are mixed feelings about the reliability and potential issues with the vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Handsofstone expressed his belief that the paint of the vehicle is stunning up close, describing it as a beautiful car that will perform well in the market with 'GLWTA'. @GDogg admired the color Rosso Efesto on the Huracan Evo, praising it as magnificent and acknowledging the subjective beauty of the interior. @boaboyoz referred to it as a 'righteous Rosso Efesto EVO' and noted it has a distinctive build, wishing the seller well with 'GLWTA'.
Neutral: @Goontrader2 shared his personal experience after recently purchasing a 2020 Evo Spyder, describing it as an 'absolute smile machine' he cannot stop driving. @Markmarkm simply stated that it is a very pretty car. @Voomba admitted confusion, initially thinking it was a normal model until realizing it is an Evo, having never seen one before.
Negative: @adammberger's comment was flagged as non-constructive, indicating a lack of supportive content. @M_Cognoscente inquired about specifics related to the aftermarket modifications, including potential issues with the car, such as whether there are any dash warning lights or problems with running and driving, expressing concern over the vehicle's condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its excellent condition and the pride of ownership evident in its maintenance. @GDogg noted that the 230SL shows loving care, while @Jay54 and @DeutscheFan complimented its aesthetics and well-preserved interior. @Dollycat3 remarked that there is much to love about the car, and @Stiffy (The Seller) emphasized the extensive documentation and lack of rust due to the vehicle being garaged in a desert climate, making it a rare find.
Neutral: Several commenters brought up specific details regarding the car's maintenance and features. @MilleMiglia mentioned that it is one of the last 400 230SLs produced, which could appeal to collectors. @kellvette raised questions about the odometer readings and maintenance history, seeking clarification from @Stiffy (The Seller), who responded with a detailed explanation regarding the odometer's status. @bjjohnston115 inquired about the car's engine performance, and the seller was quick to reassure potential buyers with transparency regarding the vehicle's condition and history.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, some comments pointed out concerns and confusion regarding the car's mileage and specific parts. @kellvette questioned the odometer's claim of only 10,000 miles before the first owner's sale in 1985, while @Edward_VII and @MilleMiglia pointed out discrepancies related to the wheels and toolkit. @Stiffy (The Seller) expressed frustration over miscommunication and the spread of misinformation about the vehicle's mileage, showing a commitment to correcting misunderstandings even in the face of some negativity from the auction platform.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Beans_Bacon describes the vehicle simply as 'Sweet.' @CRUSH highlights the vehicle's 'classic styling' and refers to it as a 'time capsule.' @johnjm appreciates the aesthetic appeal of the two-tone color scheme, stating that it looks fantastic on this era of truck. Furthermore, @dpopovich (The Seller) mentions that the bed paint looks amazing for a 40-year old truck and expresses his fondness for the vehicle, indicating a positive ownership experience.
Neutral: @rocketman231 raises a valid question about the engine size, noting the inconsistency in the listing. @svatem contributes clarification about the engine, stating that it is listed as a 5.0 in the work invoice and referencing a prior sale's posting for verification. Additionally, @jcharles69 inquires about the mounting of the camper shell, asking if it is bolted through the bed rails and whether weather stripping was used. @dpopovich (The Seller) responds to these inquiries thoughtfully, providing information about the camper's installation and agreeing to send additional pictures as requested.
Negative: @Orendain points out a confusing element in the listing, asking about the 'carpeted camper shell' and noting a discrepancy between the written description and the photos. @dixiedog80 requests pictures of specific parts of the truck, which may suggest concerns regarding potential rust in the areas mentioned. @dpopovich (The Seller) is responsive to these concerns but acknowledges the lack of rockers on the truck, which are often prone to rust in C10 trucks.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's beautiful color and overall aesthetic. @mgospo22 noted it was nicely photographed, while @RayOliver and @Crosbeian echoed similar sentiments, with @Crosbeian specifically mentioning that they would be bidding if they were on the east coast. The seller, @jagstar, shared their own affection for the car, recalling how it runs smoothly, turns heads, and draws attention from onlookers, which further emphasizes the car's appealing appearance.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on specific car features and history. @557Buck inquired about the timing chain and tensioners, while @fdaniell1623 raised a concern regarding potential undercarriage damage, which @Merkur2 quickly addressed by suggesting it was minimal. @JohnEB asked about the vehicle's cold start condition, prompting @jagstar to confirm they would reevaluate the video's accuracy. Overall, these comments reflect a cautious interest in the car's specifications and condition.
Negative: Some concerns emerged regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and potential damage. @fdaniell1623 highlighted a perceived undercarriage issue, and @557Buck pressed for information about the timing chain and tensioners, which had not been replaced according to @jagstar. These inquiries indicate a degree of caution among potential buyers about the car's mechanical reliability, contrasting with the more positive comments on its aesthetic appeal.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed high admiration for the 2001 Ford Lightning SVT, noting its potential value as a classic vehicle. @watergate528 remarked on its sharp appearance and potential to fetch a high price, while @soccermach5 highlighted its beauty and increasing market value, especially for models with lower mileage. The seller, @MassCash978, invited questions and emphasized the truck's impressive condition with under 14k miles. @OFaceDrew called it a nice example of a reliable and fun truck, and @skejoh01 noted that keeping the truck stock would enhance its value in the classic car market.
Neutral: Several comments shared informative insights regarding the vehicle, particularly on the maintenance of older Lightnings. @Molae65 cautioned future owners to re-torque the spark plugs due to a known issue with earlier models, and @39NAS-T provided specific details on the spark plug threading issues associated with Lightnings manufactured between 1999 and 2003. @MassCash978 confirmed that the truck is largely stock, with a minor addition of a tri-fold tonneau cover, and shared about the original Goodyear tires, further establishing the truck's unaltered state.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about potential mechanical issues with the 2001 Lightning. @39NAS-T shared a personal experience about the truck's tendency to spit spark plugs, indicating a possible need for immediate repairs if modifications were planned. @a.torras expressed a desperate hope for the sale price to be higher, reflecting frustration over a recent purchase of another Lightning model. Overall, while the vehicle is generally praised, the mentions of past mechanical issues hint at caution for prospective buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle's color and specifications, particularly highlighting its Venetian Blue over Linen design. @GDogg praised it as a "fantastic" example of a 911 Targa, while @Halvo noted the winning combination of low mileage and thorough documentation. Additional comments from @Beans_Bacon and @BBone33 appreciate the overall look and desirability of 930 era Targas, indicating strong interest among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments sought further information about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding rust and mechanical performance. @Mcnellisrt (The Seller) assured potential buyers that any rust issues were previously addressed and that the vehicle runs excellently with cold air conditioning. The seller also provided driving videos and confirmed that all accessories and buttons on the car are fully operational, showing transparency in communication with interested buyers.
Negative: Comments reflecting concern included remarks about potential rust issues, with @NAV8enthusiast suggesting that the vehicle may have encountered water damage, while @54batwing expressed worry over potential rust from undercoating. There were queries about a dent on the targa bar and discrepancies in the compression test results, leading to skepticism regarding the car's overall condition. @Namtrop66 found it crucial to address the seat motors and to clarify the mechanical pressures, indicating a desire for assurance on the vehicle's mechanical integrity.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the beauty and elegance of the 1934 Packard, including @mrjirey who refers to it as a 'beauty', and @boaboyoz expressing that it is 'elegant' and 'thoroughly splendid'. @Gordoninttexas notes its solid condition and reliable performance, emphasizing the owner's dedication to maintaining the car's original state. Additionally, @billyblyth and @Vtec4ever both praise Packard's innovative V12 engine, acknowledging its historical significance in American automotive history and craftsmanship. The car is also noted as a great candidate for tours as highlighted by @jamessmithy.
Neutral: Comments from @Trainsplanesandautos (The Seller) detail the car's specifics, including that it is a preservation class vehicle with no major restorations done on the interior or paint. The seller proactively engages with potential bidders by addressing questions about the car's history, including mileage, and by providing additional photos to clarify its condition. @Dairyman mentions that the V12's flawless operation is characterized by minimal sounds, which further adds to the car's charm. However, there are remarks about the showcased photographs, with multiple users, including @59turner and @denny6.53, suggesting that better quality images are needed for a clearer presentation.
Negative: There are a few critical comments regarding the car's presentation and authenticity, particularly concerning the quality of photos that some perceive as overly poor, likening them to those taken 'with a potato' according to @59turner. @Grimsby and @2011SLSAMG question the originality of the front seat upholstery, suggesting it might have been recovered rather than being in its original condition. Additionally, there are comments about concerns related to the car's oil leakage after driving and questions about its capabilities for long-distance journeys, as noted by @2011SLSAMG, which reflect doubts about the vehicle's practical usability.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express excitement about the vehicle's design and features. @ntbd4 praises the Cobra for its aesthetic appeal, emphasizing the impressive quality of the paint and overall presentation. @Cdn043 appreciates the distinctive sound of the 302 engine, recommending viewers to check out the video for a demonstration. Several participants, including @Djh302 and @Jadfarhat, noted the Cobra's striking color and overall attractiveness, suggesting that it resonates well with potential buyers looking for a well-detailed replica.
Neutral: The seller, @dj_walls2424, provides detailed information about the vehicle's specifications, including estimated horsepower and torque. Commenters have questions about various aspects like tire conditions and oil pan status, which the seller addresses promptly. Additionally, there are discussions regarding title clarity, with @chille36M3 noting inconsistencies in the title information, which @dj_walls2424 rectifies in a follow-up comment, showcasing transparency in communication.
Negative: Some negative comments arise around specific details like the condition of the oil pan. @Djh302 points out possible damage, questioning whether it is merely cosmetic or indicative of deeper issues. @Toddh03 and other commenters discuss the commonality of undercarriage scrapes with Cobras but acknowledge the inherent design challenges these classic cars face. Despite concerns, most participants agree that routine wear is typical, and @dj_walls2424 reassures the community that there are no significant issues with the oil pan, maintaining confidence in the vehicle's condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors appreciated the overall look of the vehicle, with @GDogg calling it a 'very cool Series III' and @66rover99 noting it as a 'nice truck'. @19Willys46 highlighted a specific aspect, recommending a steering wheel replacement but expressing overall positivity towards the Land Rover. Additionally, @VisualWatcher evoked nostalgia reminiscent of adventure films, reflecting a strong emotional connection to the vehicle's design.
Neutral: @Steve5874, the seller, provided thorough clarifications and updates regarding inquiries about paint discrepancies and the vehicle's condition. He acknowledged the possibility of a repaint and mentioned that he would be gathering more pictures to address potential concerns. @Sidney67 requested additional pictures, particularly under the floor mats and doors, demonstrating a practical approach to assessing the vehicle's condition while @ainternetguy expressed interest in seeing the truck in person, indicating a serious buyer.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the appearance of the paint on the driver's door, leading @ainternetguy to question if it has been repainted. @Sidney67 expressed skepticism about the vehicle's undercoating and potential rust issues, pointing out visible signs that needed further inspection. @Steve5874 admitted the lack of knowledge about the vehicle’s service history or refurbishment details from the previous owner, which left some potential buyers apprehensive about the vehicle's authenticity and condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the overall aesthetic appeal and condition of the 1965 Ford Mustang being auctioned. @altaylar complimented the car's beauty and wished the seller luck with the sale, while @GotClutch praised the upgrades and expressed eagerness to drive it. @jameslgleason noted the car's impressive looks and emphasized its desirability, mentioning that it would be a prized addition to any collection. Others, like @eldonchas, expressed admiration for the modifications and highlighted the car as a capable driver. Overall, the comments reflect a consensus that the Mustang is a visually striking vehicle.
Neutral: Several commentators sought clarifications regarding specific features and history related to the car, demonstrating an interest in its technical aspects. @JUsher inquired about the wheel size and clearance issues, while @bmwspyder and @CarFoolLane asked about the status of the air conditioning and engine specifications, indicating that such details are of importance to potential bidders. @SFT-NY (The Seller) addressed these inquiries with detailed responses, which added to the buyers' understanding of the vehicle's condition and modifications. Additionally, concerns about the VIN accuracy raised by @jameslgleason were met with clarifications from the seller, furthering transparency in the auction process.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism or concern regarding specific aspects of the vehicle. @cajunman inquired about oil leaks mentioned in the listing, prompting @SFT-NY (The Seller) to clarify that they were minor but present. @shane_stang raised a potential issue regarding the car’s title status, questioning how the vehicle could be registered without a title, reflecting concerns about legal ownership transfer. Furthermore, @Hoppy18 expressed confusion regarding the paint meter readings, indicating potential uncertainty about the car's history or condition. These reservations highlight the importance of transparency and thorough documentation when dealing with classic cars.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beautiful color and overall condition. @NVGT350 described it as a 'beautiful car' and a 'NR gem,' while @dj_walls2424 shared their long-term affection for their own Saleen, emphasizing how these cars are increasing in value. @Z282SLO praised the quality of the repaint, noting how it looks immaculate despite the mileage, and @CarmanUSA2025 commented on the 'beautiful color.' Overall, there is a strong appreciation for the car's aesthetics and quality among the buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Debbienan (The Seller), responded to inquiries about the car's specifics, such as the condition of the rear lights and whether original parts were retained. @leo23k asked about various modifications and replacement parts, to which @Debbienan clarified that the car maintains most original elements, although some parts, like the windshield, have been replaced. Questions regarding the original radio, engine compartment, and repaint quality were also raised, showing that potential buyers are interested in maintaining the car's authenticity.
Negative: There were concerns raised regarding the repainted areas appearing different in color, which @PedalthehillsCO pointed out, indicating that the door jambs and engine compartment looked lighter. @HAPPY commented on Ford's historical paint quality issues, suggesting that imperfections were typical in the 80s. Additionally, @jahm1642 inquired about the cut in the dash for an aftermarket radio and the condition of the torque boxes. These comments reflect potential apprehensions regarding the car's modifications and its original state.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @sundialer66 describes the vehicle as a trustworthy and reliable XJ that he has owned. He highlights that both manifolds were replaced with genuine Mopar parts due to cracks, and he performed maintenance on the cooling system, brakes, and transmission. The seller assures potential buyers that the vehicle shifts, idles, and drives excellently, and points out no engine lights remain after starting despite the initial concerns from @jb987 about the check engine light being a common issue in XJs. Another commenter, @hank_william, appreciates the simplicity of the SE models, commenting on its options such as full gauges and a leather steering wheel.
Neutral: @sundialer66 mentions the photograph of the mileage showing the key in the on position but not running, clarifying the state of the vehicle for potential buyers. He plans to add a cold start video to showcase its performance further. @aviones1 raises a concern regarding negative comments about the vehicle's year, disagreeing with the seller's remarks on cracked heads in the 2000-2001 models. He suggests a focus on the positivity of the vehicle instead of potentially denigrating other model years, while @troys_325 stands by the seller's comments about the cylinder heads' issues specific to those years.
Negative: @aviones1 expresses skepticism about @sundialer66's comments regarding the cracked heads, cautioning against denigrating other model years without proper context. @americanmuscleTX agrees with cautioning broad statements about these engines, noting potential issues with 0331 heads, which are a topic of discussion in forums. Additionally, @jeffw questions the common belief about head issues, sharing his experience with 2001 models having over 200,000 miles without trouble, which he attributes to other mechanical aspects of the vehicle, suggesting that the narrative surrounding the 1999 model being superior may not be entirely justified. Meanwhile, @MrBman inquires about prior repairs relating to front-end damage, signaling potential concerns over the vehicle's history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz notes that the Hubert M37 is a handsome vehicle with a tremendous build, expressing goodwill for the sale. @KoBear1 believes the truck would look great in a parade, while @Boombox44 finds it to be just right. @cpl593h highlights the advantage of the M37 being worked on by M Series Rebuild, pointing out their expertise in military vehicles. @BFront (The Seller) agrees and praises the team's knowledge about military Dodge trucks.
Neutral: @jgroehler inquires about the truck's location and expresses love for the vehicle, mentioning his search for his first military vehicle. While he appreciates the truck, he slightly disapproves of the US Army branding on the hood due to his background as a retired USMC. @BFront (The Seller) responds to questions from potential buyers, detailing the truck's performance and condition, confirming its location on the coast of NC.
Negative: @Rob1953 comments that the M37 needs some love overall, indicating it may require repairs or restoration. @BFront (The Seller) explains that while the truck drives well, it is not fast due to its military design, noting it is geared lower for robust performance in a military environment. He acknowledges there are minor surface rust areas but assures that there are no rust-through spots, and mentions that he chose not to repaint the truck, which could be a concern for some potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its status as a solid and legendary car. @bmdaia referred to it as 'pure Porsche solid gold' and noted its potential future appreciation in value. @Mason320 agreed, stating that the 996TT is a legend that is currently underrated and will gain recognition in the years to come. The seller, @NeilShannon, conveyed his strong attachment to the car, noting how it has always been garaged, regularly serviced, and that driving it brings him joy.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding specific details about the car's condition and features. @Espanolie asked about the original carbon steering wheel and shifter, to which @NeilShannon responded with an explanation of the changes made due to wear. @oneconnoisseur and others probed about functionalities like the windshield washer not working and the state of the spoiler, with the seller providing updates and further information on these aspects.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the car's maintenance and potential issues. @MikeSarge inquired about the coolant lines, revealing that they had not been pinned or welded, which could be an issue for potential buyers. @Carina964 and others pointed out the necessity of verifying the condition of parts like the front bumper and the calipers, indicating that there may be visible imperfections. Additionally, there was uncertainty regarding the hydraulic system of the spoiler, which is known for potential failures, suggesting some apprehension about its reliability.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments from various enthusiasts reflect a warm appreciation for the truck, emphasizing its beauty and mostly original condition. @AlohaZ3 describes it as a "gorgeous truck," while @neverenoughgold adds that it is refreshing to see the truck mostly original, avoiding modern alterations. @dave6691 also admires the truck, calling it a "real beauty," and @Lotusseven appreciates the restoration, likening the experience to stepping back 73 years.
Neutral: Several queries were raised about the truck's specifics, particularly regarding the condition and authenticity of its parts. @larryjack questioned whether refurbished instruments meant they were repaired or replaced, also noting the lack of underside photos. @CSuozzi inquired about the originality of the sheet metal, asking if there were any fiberglass panels. The Seller, @dprusinowski, responded by clarifying that some instruments were repaired and others replaced, while he was uncertain about the panels' originality, stating there are no fiberglass components.
Negative: Some concerns were expressed about particular details of the truck. @BadlandsB questioned the functionality of the cowl vent and jack, while also asking about the tail and brake light functions. The response from @dprusinowski indicated there might be some confusion regarding the vehicle's lighting setup. There was also an implication of potential discomfort in winter driving, as noted by @Jdukem, who humorously remarked on the left arm getting cold from hand signals while driving the vintage truck.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @RidleysRides noted that the vehicle looks really good, which suggests that the overall exterior condition may be visually appealing to potential buyers. Comments from users indicate specific features that seem to be appreciated, and clarity is provided on certain specifications and options regarding the vehicle, like the rear defrost feature, as confirmed by @MConverse74.
Neutral: Comments from @TAM02 and @Jimb0 highlight a common interest in technical details, including the location of the oil filter and the presence of a rear defrost feature, suggesting that these technical aspects are crucial considerations for prospective buyers. @mcqueens (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the CARFAX report, explaining the limitations due to the vehicle's age, which may suggest that buyers need to rely on other inspection methods instead.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's brake line, with @Ace1 pointing out what looks like a nick and suggesting it might need attention, while @rdowney30 clarified that the appearance may only be a drop of oil, although an in-person inspection is deemed necessary for thorough assessment. Additionally, there is an ongoing dialogue about potential missing documentation, particularly regarding the CARFAX report as noted by @ASEMasterTech, indicating possible transparency issues that might concern buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commentators highlighted the beauty and nostalgia associated with the truck, with @wxflyer calling it a "timeless classic" and expressing admiration for its high restoration quality. @LoudNotFast noted the evident love and care that has gone into the truck, indicating it is a real beauty. @mlchristian appreciated the level of restoration detail and anticipates that it will perform well in the market, while @UltimateZo acknowledged the seller's expertise in Toyota pickups, noting this marked their 13th sale on BaT.
Neutral: Many participants asked questions regarding specific features or conditions of the truck. @brendino inquired about the presence of air conditioning, to which @Dpiagg (The Seller) confirmed none exists. @willy and @zrobeach89 asked about the smog testing history and the possibility of adding A/C, to which the seller assured that there shouldn’t be any smog issues due to California emissions, and noted that options for an A/C system are available. @73cr250 expressed enthusiasm for seeing the truck at the upcoming Coronado car show, to which @Dpiagg confirmed attendance and encouraged locals to check out the lineup.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the seller's credibility. @investigator3104 pointed out that @Dpiagg has actively sold multiple trucks and questioned if they were operating as a dealer instead of a private seller, although @Dpiagg insisted they are a collector. Additionally, @WWjbr's comment about the truck’s model designation was flagged as non-constructive, indicating possible disputes about the modifications made to the vehicle. Overall, the comments suggest a mix of appreciation, inquiry, and scrutiny regarding the truck and the seller's practices.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dino886 appreciates the truck's great presentation and finds it awesome. @stugottz expresses a deep affection for the vehicle, highlighting its vintage appeal by saying, 'it’s ’69' with a heart emoji. @boaboyoz describes the El Camino as a 'magnificent maroon' and compliments the build quality, labeling it as a 'bad a$ build' and extending good wishes to the seller. Additionally, @braktrcr thanks @donwillett for resisting the temptation to add excessive SS badges, indicating a preference for the truck's authenticity.
Neutral: @bigboysurf points out the interesting features of the truck, specifically mentioning the hood scoops and tailpipes, showing curiosity without a strong opinion. @DeVos44 engages with @CorvairGA, confirming the existence of stock versions but expressing a personal conflict about selling their own truck, which indicates they view the one in question positively. @derrickcarr07 inquires about the reserve status of the truck, demonstrating interest in the sale process without expressing a definitive opinion on the vehicle itself. @Tink clarifies @derrickcarr07's confusion regarding whether there is a reserve, providing helpful information.
Negative: @GLWTA suggests passing on the truck, questioning the availability of stock versions, which reflects a skeptical viewpoint. @Boostwagon admits to having no practical use for the truck or space for it but expresses feelings of lust towards it, implying a strong emotional reaction despite practical concerns but does not favor the purchase. Overall, the truck seems to evoke different reactions based on practicality versus emotional attraction.
40k-Mile 1994 Ford E-150 Econoline Starcraft Conversion Van
1FDEE14H5RHB52184
Lot 190224
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @obr549 praised the van for being exceptionally straight and clean, highlighting its climate-controlled storage as a major plus and expressing satisfaction with their personal inspection. @KM_AXer reminisced about their own positive experiences with similar vintage conversion vans, deeming this one a great find for travel and camping. @Busdrivermike shared a similar story of how their previous conversion van proved to be highly reliable, suggesting that this vehicle could provide the same level of satisfaction.
Neutral: @VVanner inquired about the height of the van with the topper and luggage rails, which @rodramin (The Seller) clarified is 91 inches at the highest point with the rails. @annie126 sought details on the interior dimensions and functionality of the seats, and @rodramin confirmed the specifics about space and seat adjustments, stating that the van has 40K miles and included various features. @newcarpro added a lighthearted comment about the van's potential for being a good place to sleep.
Negative: @mbinsures raised concerns regarding the quick sale of the van after its recent purchase, questioning the reasoning behind it. Another comment by @Jdukem reflected on the challenges of owning older vehicles, pointing out the difficulty in finding parts and the need for careful financial consideration due to the van's age. @KM_AXer also cautioned about the potential availability issues of key components for the vehicle, stressing that while it may be attractive, it comes with inherent risks due to its vintage status.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @huskerbrian commented on the great appearance of the car, expressing enthusiasm for the model. @birchbranch looks forward to seeing the auction, mentioning a family member who owns a similar model and enjoys it. @aegmotorsports has described the vehicle in detail, highlighting features such as the Bi-Xenon headlights, Bose stereo system, and the powerful engine, creating interest and excitement among potential bidders.
Neutral: @aegmotorsports confirmed that videos would be added soon and shared details about the no-reserve auction format, allowing bidders to either have the car shipped or drive it home. They provided links to the full build sheet and reproduction window sticker, catering to interested parties seeking more information. Questions can be directed to @aegmotorsports, ensuring that potential buyers have access to necessary details before placing their bids.
Negative: @dcnsr raised concerns about the vehicle's maintenance history, specifically mentioning the cam position sensor and the timing chain service. @aegmotorsports addressed these concerns by clarifying that the issues cited were common and addressed in previous years, implying that they are not significant red flags. Despite some minor worries about wear, @dcnsr appreciated @aegmotorsports' clear communication regarding the vehicle's upkeep, reflecting a need for transparency in the auction process.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg complimented the vehicle, describing it as a very cool Series III. @66rover99 also expressed their admiration, calling it a nice truck and sharing a potential connection to its past in Costa Rica. @VisualWatcher commented that the vehicle evokes serious "Jumanji" or "Indiana Jones" vibes, showing enthusiasm for its unique character. @Steve5874, the seller, is actively engaging with potential buyers, providing additional pictures of the vehicle and a video to clarify paint differences, demonstrating good customer service.
Neutral: @Steve5874 acknowledged the concern regarding the steering wheel and door paint shade, stating that he would investigate further and provide more images. He mentioned that the truck was repainted before eventually coming to the US and noted that the previous owner's contact information wasn't available. Throughout the interaction, he received requests for additional images and responded promptly to inquiries, reflecting a willingness to provide as much information as needed to prospective buyers.
Negative: @ainternetguy raised concerns about the painted steering wheel and potential mismatched paint on the driver's door, questioning whether the vehicle had been repainted. @Sidney67 brought up worries about rust, specifically asking for photos of areas under the floor mats and doors, indicating possible seller oversight. Additionally, @Sidney67 noted the absence of an overdrive feature in the vehicle, suggesting that while the truck has both visual appeal and potential, it may lack some functional enhancements.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the unique and appealing aspects of the rickshaw. @djimbe notes its authentic vintage charm, calling it 'about 9 kinds of awesome,' emphasizing that it's not a modern reproduction but the real deal. @austin_alfa expresses a strong desire to own it, while @PoweredbyFord envisions it as a perfect summer side-hustle, stating that people would love the ride. Other bidders like @GLWTA and @39mercman commend the vehicle's rarity and suggest it could serve well in the sight-seeing industry, indicating a favorable perception of its potential marketability.
Neutral: Some comments offer logistical clarifications or inquiries regarding the rickshaw's specifications and location. @SurfHag asks about its whereabouts, prompting @justpaul to provide the location details. @wasteaway offers a light-hearted observation on the rider's size in relation to the vehicle. @Carbuf60, the seller, contributes by providing additional technical details about the rickshaw, including its motorcycle classification and operational aspects, as well as addressing questions about its speed and wiring.
Negative: A few remarks might suggest concerns or quirks about the rickshaw. @c2kid critiques the terminology used in the listing, demonstrating attention to detail, while @Bjhii9797 raises a question about a possible issue with what appears to be electrical tape on the undercarriage. @johnnyb11 expresses skepticism about the absence of a battery despite the presence of an ammeter, hinting at an underlying concern regarding the vehicle's usability. Lastly, @Mot humorously points out the potential insurance implications, introducing a slightly negative tone regarding practicality.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a range of appreciation for the vehicle, particularly noting its aesthetic appeal as a 'beautiful car' as mentioned by @Viabill, who supports the decision to opt for red interior to increase its appeal. @AutoCrazy praised the 'Nice SWC to enjoy,' highlighting the car's potential for enjoyment. Additionally, @MISA6484 (The Seller) elaborated on the car's engineering, mentioning the 340 HP solid lifter engine with a 11:1 compression ratio, which many in the comments found desirable for a classic vehicle. Commenters such as @tccoupe expressed an interest in seeing the car in action, emphasizing the joy of driving such a well-engineered classic.
Neutral: Several comments provided insights into the car's history and condition without strong positive or negative sentiments. @E-TypeOTS speculated on the possibility of the car originally being a 340 HP L-76, questioning the modifications made and expressing curiosity about the engine's specifics. @MISA6484 (The Seller) clarified several aspects, including door details and replacement engine specifics, contributing information to the ongoing discussion. Others like @E_TypeOTS and @Nankaroad acknowledged the car's transformation through restoration, suggesting it was done to the tastes of the restorer rather than maintaining original specifications, indicating a balance between history and personal preference.
Negative: Critical comments focused on the car's extensive modifications, which some commenters believed detracted from its value and authenticity. @Nankaroad expressed concern about losing the original Daytona Blue/Red color combination due to repainting, calling it a 'cobbled together SWC.' This sentiment was echoed by others like @VETTTEGUY and @Gloccamora, who discussed the implications of its modifications and potential impact on desirability. @revolverz and @silver63 questioned the reasons behind various replacements in the vehicle's structure and engine, indicating skepticism about the car's integrity and suggesting it might affect its market appeal. Overall, some viewers expressed doubts regarding the car's value based on its extensive alterations and the potential for mismatch with original factory specifications.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the vehicle's aesthetics and quality, highlighting it as a fantastic example of the NSX model. @evasivemotorsports exclaimed, "Wow, this is a nice one!" while @Scagneti echoed this sentiment, mentioning it as a really nice NSX. @boaboyoz called it an "absolutely fabulous Formula Red NSX-T" and praised the seller for being cool. Furthermore, @bblackjr noted that the car looks as if it had just come off the showroom floor, reinforcing its pristine condition and the admiration it draws from the community.
Neutral: Several comments included logistical aspects and neutral observations about the vehicle's condition and auction happenings. @nexusautobrokers mentioned their excitement about bringing classic cars to the auction, reflecting on their past experiences and promoting free shipping to the 48 states. @IMAGINETHAT inquired about the condition of the undercarriage, showing interest in its upkeep, while @dkschlut and @Emdoller questioned the consistency of the paint on different panels, indicating active engagement in understanding the vehicle's condition without outright negativity.
Negative: There were a few concerns raised about the car's paint job, with @dkschlut and @Emdoller expressing doubts about the color matching on the driver’s door and front fender. Despite the seller's reassurance that the paint work was appropriate and that differences in light could create such impressions, these comments suggest that some potential buyers are wary of possible cosmetic issues. However, @nexusautobrokers attempted to reassure them by stating that the car came from a collection and reflects a high standard of care, even though the inquiries indicated some skepticism from the community.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received several compliments highlighting its beauty and strong performance. @Stewardship7 noted that it features a great motor, while @Samclub expressed admiration for the truck's appearance. @aidanferrer joined in by requesting a cold start and walk-around video to appreciate the vehicle's sound and aesthetics further. The seller, @BlakesTrucksNW, actively engaged with bidders, sharing videos that showcased the truck in various conditions, enhancing interest and excitement.
Neutral: Inquiries about the truck's condition led to a few neutral comments regarding specific vehicle features. @planeblaine asked about the functionality of interior instruments, including the water temperature, and received prompt responses from @BlakesTrucksNW confirming that most features work well, although the gas gauge is slightly off and the temperature gauge does not operate. Additionally, @bryndinhartman raised questions about the fuel tanks and requested a video to check for blow-by, to which @BlakesTrucksNW confirmed that both fuel tanks work without mechanical concerns, maintaining transparency in communication with potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition, with @radford mentioning visible blisters on the tailgate and bed, prompting inquiries about the underlying spray coating. This indicates potential issues with the truck's exterior that interested bidders are wary of. Furthermore, there were lingering questions about the functionality of certain gauges and components, which were addressed by the seller but highlight potential areas of caution for future buyers observing the vehicle's reliability.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the attractive features of the Camaro, particularly its eye-catching Rallye Green color. @Al_Swearengen calls it a 'very nice Camaro example' that 'really grabs attention,' while @a990dna refers to it as a 'killer Rallye Green Z,' indicating it has the best color combination. @GJA expresses interest in seeing the car in person, showing genuine appreciation for its aesthetics. The seller, @Deltina, receives praise for the restoration quality, with @Boaboyoz calling it a 'Rallye Green dream.' @gidJay also comments, 'Fantastic car! GLWTA from the DEA.'
Neutral: Some comments center on technical inquiries and details of the vehicle's specifications, such as the rear gear ratio and the status of various parts. @TopDeadCenter09 asks about the rear gear ratio, while @Hknudsen questions the presence of A/C, which @Deltina confirms is not available on original Z28 vehicles. There's also curiosity about the original trim tag and potential panel replacements noted by @Gpace and @silver63, along with general inquiries about shipping and tariffs by @Skeetjf. @ssterry and @1969Z28fan suggest investigating hidden VINs further, reflecting a careful approach to verifying authenticity.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding potential modifications and the authenticity of certain parts. @1969Z28fan claims that the trim tag appears to be a reproduction, and @ssterry concurs, questioning the originality of the upper dash due to its replacement. @carcrazies expresses frustration over a rattling noise mentioned by @Sigma76, which @Deltina attributes to the ashtray assembly and coins within it. The uncertainty regarding the engine's original components and the previous owner's knowledge also surfaces, with @skeetjf asking about the specifics of the engine rebuild. Overall, while many appreciate the vehicle's appearance and the seller's efforts, some caution about possible discrepancies in its history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @calparts mentioned that the newer style lights are an improvement over the old ones, indicating a positive enhancement after modifications were made. @aaronfj40 (The Seller) expressed gratitude for feedback about the front bezel and explained that the design was intentional, reflecting personal aesthetic choices that some might appreciate. Additionally, @aaronfj40 is planning to provide a driving video, suggesting an openness to engage with potential buyers and showcase the vehicle's performance.
Neutral: @pcough raised an inquiry about the possibility of a driving video, indicating interest in the vehicle's performance at highway speeds. Another comment from @pcough questioned the decision behind the engine running rich and whether a leaner adjustment was possible, suggesting curiosity without outright criticism. This feedback demonstrates potential buyers seeking more specific information before making a purchase decision.
Negative: @GregRay pointed out a concern with the 'upside down front bezel,' implying a flaw or oversight in the design that could detract from the vehicle's aesthetic appeal. @Chamba responded with a somewhat dismissive attitude about the bezel, implying that it was a distraction from another issue—incorrect front turn signals. Concerns were also raised by @pcough regarding the engine's efficiency and operation, hinting at possible performance issues that could deter prospective buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters have expressed excitement about the Viper being offered at auction, with @Kzoghbi (The Seller) highlighting the car's well-maintained condition and recent maintenance, including an oil change. @manofstealth praised the vehicle as a desirable option among Gen 1 Vipers and noted its potential as a great entry point into the Viper market, while @Jeepmike described it as an ideal track car with a few flaws, encouraging bidders to let the market decide its value. @Qvale also complimented the car, noting its factory options and rare features, indicating a general enthusiasm for the model being auctioned.
Neutral: Several users engaged in discussions about specific details of the vehicle, including tire conditions and the historical context of its CarFax report. @Surffly raised important questions regarding the lack of updates from 2013 to 2020, which suggested the vehicle may have been off the road during that time. @Kzoghbi clarified the situation regarding the car's maintenance history, confirming it belonged to an enthusiast who did regular upkeep and giving useful details about tire age and condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding some peculiarities about the car, such as the absence of a shift knob and the illuminated alarm light during the driving video, which @Qvale pointed out. Additionally, questions were posed about the vehicle's past, including minor accidents that had occurred, as mentioned by @Kzoghbi; this disclosure might alarm potential bidders. @Surffly's inquiries about vehicle inspections and maintenance also highlighted uncertainties surrounding the vehicle's service history, which could deter some interested parties.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg made a favorable remark about the vehicle, commenting "Nice GW," which indicates a positive impression of the vehicle's overall look or condition. This suggests that at least some viewers find the vehicle appealing.
Neutral: @GLWTA shared additional pictures from a recent drive, which could imply ongoing engagement and interest in the vehicle's features and condition. Additionally, the request from @58GMC for a video of the tailgate window going down indicates a desire for more visual information about the vehicle, showing that prospective buyers are looking for specifics in a practical manner.
Negative: There are no explicit negative comments regarding the vehicle in the provided data. The interactions revolve around positive feedback and requests for more information. This may suggest that there is a general satisfaction or curiosity among those commenting.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beautiful restoration and striking color. @hneilm described it as beautifully done, while @AlohaZ3 praised its 'Mocha Madness' color, saying it turned out beautifully. @CapricornGuy shared that this Beetle is one of his favorite vintage cars he has seen, complementing the hard work put into its restoration. Additionally, @BOWSERBOY1950 appreciated the inclusion of a restoration book, calling it classy. Others, like @Tascani, found the interior color well-matched to the exterior, and @AAkron87 noted the car's excellent taste, reiterating its appeal to many.
Neutral: The seller, @ckb72, actively engaged with commenters, providing insights into the vehicle's features and the reason for selling it. Interestingly, @ckb72 explained that he originally intended to keep the car for his daughter, who expressed more interest in using the money for a wedding instead. The seller detailed various enhancements, such as a center console with modern technology, a polished walnut T-handle for the shifter, and the relocation of critical engine components to improve safety and reliability. This added a personal touch to the comments, drawing further engagement from users curious about the modifications.
Negative: While the comments generally leaned toward positive feedback, potential concerns arose around the seller's reason for selling so soon after restoration. @CapricornGuy questioned the motivation behind putting the car up for sale so quickly, reflecting a hint of skepticism over relinquishing such a well-cared-for vehicle. Additionally, @iamlost inquired about technical details regarding the relocation of the fuel pump and oil cooler, suggesting a need for clarity around modifications. These inquiries may imply that while many admire the car, some prospective buyers might still have reservations or require additional reassurance about its updates.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @AlohaZ3 admires the impressive maintenance work done on the vehicle, noting that it has a 'new lease on life,' suggesting it is ready for enthusiastic driving. @SoftDough appreciates the effort put into bringing the car back on the road and expresses interest in knowing about the condition of the cylinders. Many commenters, including @letthegypsyhaveit, prefer this Carrera Coupe over newer models, indicating a strong affection for its classic appeal. @RumbleAuto finds the car to be a great example of the 996 series and has even recommended it to a friend, which adds to its desirability.
Neutral: Several comments request additional details about specific aspects of the car. For instance, @jkporterfield asks for the stereo model, and @Crestwood996 and @rocketron show interest in information about the aftermarket wheels. The seller, @TheGreatCornjoelio, provides thorough answers and shares insights about various features, including that the original stereo is still included in the sale. The seller also discusses maintenance tasks undertaken, such as replacing the shifter cable and ECU repair, showcasing a commitment to ensuring the car is in great condition.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns about specific aspects of the car. @WFS inquires whether there has been work done on the exhaust, pointing out a possible alignment issue with the tips. @radcrujones questions the authenticity of the 997 sourced seats, asserting they resemble 996 seats instead; however, the seller clarifies this was a misunderstanding concerning the seats' origin. Additionally, @JT77 mentions hearing sounds that may indicate a need for new shocks, highlighting ongoing maintenance considerations for potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CRUSH expressed excitement about the vehicle being nearby and appreciated @seller for keeping the undercarriage in its natural state, indicating a positive perception of the truck's condition. @AutoAppraise, representing the seller, provided assurance that the truck is a one-owner vehicle and has been garage-kept since new, reinforcing its quality. Additionally, there was mention of the truck being well-cared for, low mileage due to its usage for towing, and the family locating a 5th wheel attachment to be included, all suggesting that the truck is a valued and maintained asset.
Neutral: @np387 inquired about the title discrepancy, asking whether the new title is in the widow's name or @AutoAppraise's, and expressed interest in understanding the details of a reported accident and repairs. @Jerryray posed a question regarding the tire date codes as he attempted to assess the truck’s condition from the pictures. These inquiries indicate a neutral stance, showing curiosity but not expressing either strong positivity or negativity towards the vehicle.
Negative: @Np387 raised a concern about the title situation, specifically questioning the need for a duplicate title and the reported accident. @AutoAppraise responded by explaining that the original title was lost, leading to the duplicate being issued in the widow's name; however, the mention of past repairs and accident history could imply potential worries about the vehicle's integrity. Although @AutoAppraise clarified that there was no visible evidence of repairs, the need for concern over these points could create a negative impression about the vehicle for some potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has garnered praise for its appealing color, with @Sternzeit noting that "Orient Red 501 is a very nice color." Commentators have expressed positive sentiments about the car's overall condition, with @Hazel1 observing that the seller uploaded more pictures, which depict the car as clean and are consistent with the Carfax report. Additionally, @Mwest334 (The Seller) reassured potential buyers by confirming that the car runs well and does not burn oil, adding that it starts right up and functions perfectly.
Neutral: Several commentators have raised inquiries and observations that reflect a neutral stance on the vehicle. For instance, @GLWTA expressed the need for more detailed pictures, particularly of the undercarriage and service history, emphasizing the importance of inspection. @gelles also made an observation about the headrest configurations appearing different, suggesting the need for clarification. While these comments do not express strong opinions, they demonstrate an involvement in ensuring potential buyers have comprehensive information.
Negative: Concerns regarding the car's maintenance and condition have been highlighted in various comments. @jelleyroll128 pointed out the vulnerability of earlier U.S. versions due to the potential issue with the timing chain, urging to know if it had been upgraded, which could lead to catastrophic engine failure if not addressed. @19Willys46 also questioned the likelihood of this model selling well compared to others, while @Rotors indicated that without further seller engagement and detailed imagery, this auction may not reach its full potential. Additionally, the observation about the faded hood by @Sternzeit adds to the concerns surrounding the vehicle's aesthetic condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @getouth praised the vehicle, noting that it is awesome, rare, and a great alternative to the more expensive //M5, indicating it holds a lot of value if purchased at the right price, especially for buyers with some DIY skills. @bkuehnert, the seller, responded to inquiries positively, providing detailed explanations about the car's maintenance and features, including the replacement of the suspension refresh and the functionality of the BlueBus Bluetooth system, which he described as amazing.
Neutral: There were questions regarding the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @Stentr suggested that documentation for the timing chain tensioner replacement would enhance the bidding process, highlighting its importance when purchasing the car. @MaryRae inquired about fluid puddles reported on the driveway, which @bkuehnert clarified were just washed wheels and that the car doesn’t actually have leaks. Additionally, @DriveMsport asked for details regarding the cooling system and requested closer images of a dent on the rocker panel, to which the seller responded with information about the car's history and condition.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about the car's state. @MaryRae expressed doubts about the tire condition, stating that a local BMW service center might find the car unsafe due to the poor tire condition. @DirkGently sought clarification on the timing chain's service history, while @bkuehnert confirmed that only the primary tensioner was replaced, implying potential buyer hesitance regarding the vehicle's overall mechanical inspection.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters praised the beauty and quality of the vehicle, with @Dan_M referring to the XK8 as great looking and @rnunez191 expressing admiration for how it would complement his own car. @3XKRocket, who owns a similar model, provided a detailed recommendation for prospective buyers, emphasizing the engineering excellence of the XK8/XKR line and pointed out that the supercharged engine offers more fun. Additionally, @socalmugu described their personal experience with the XKR and the positive service from the dealer, highlighting the color combination and overall appeal of the model.
Neutral: The seller, @dunlapimports, provided clarifications regarding the fees associated with the sale. They explained that additional fees are required by California law for smog and documentation and insisted that these fees are transparent and must be displayed. Some commenters, like @ppmidway and @NESTIUS, discussed nuances about documentation fees for in-state and out-of-state buyers without taking a strong stance on the issue, while others noticed that the discussion detracted from the car's features.
Negative: Several commenters expressed frustration with the documentary fee charges, with @rnunez191 accusing @dunlapimports of being misleading, stating that other dealers do not impose such fees on BaT. @NESTIUS described the seller's argumentative tone as unprofessional, suggesting that the fees could potentially be absorbed by the dealer to improve the transaction experience. Additionally, technical concerns about the car were raised, such as the need for replacing hoses to prevent failures, which some acknowledged as a common issue in aging models.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the impressive features and aesthetics of the 2015 Porsche Macan S, with @mlowengrub praising the color combination as 'very sharp'. Commenters express interest in the vehicle's high-end specifications, such as its turbocharged V6 engine, luxurious interior, and advanced technology offerings. Additionally, @YatesExley describes it as a 'great mini SUV' and suggests that enhancements could significantly boost its performance, indicating a general enjoyment of the vehicle's capabilities.
Neutral: @aegmotorsports (The Seller) provided detailed responses to inquiries regarding the vehicle, addressing concerns about the brakes and confirming that all components are new. They clarified the status of the tires, battery, and PDK transmission servicing, which seemed to reassure potential buyers. The seller also confirmed that the Macan includes two key fobs and provided links to additional documentation for interested buyers, indicating that they are transparent about the vehicle's condition and history.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, such as @Krutz28 questioning the limited service records despite increased mileage, and @mlowengrub mentioning that the condition of the rear brake rotors was initially misleading. @chdavis noted the absence of an upgraded sound system, highlighting a perceived gap in features that might be standard in this price range. These comments reflect a degree of skepticism about certain aspects of the vehicle and its upkeep.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @kotizakatz is presenting a well-maintained 1990 BMW 325i E30 convertible for auction, emphasizing its superb condition and extensive maintenance history over the last 30 years. The car has been garage-kept since purchase, comes with multiple keys, and features a clean CARFAX report. The seller has invested in significant maintenance including timing belt and water pump replacements, and has used reputable repair shops throughout ownership. Many commenters, like @gdogg and @bluebimmers, appreciated the aesthetic quality of the vehicle, suggesting it’s a desirable classic that has been well taken care of.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged with @kotizakatz, posing reasonable questions about the vehicle's condition and specifics. For instance, @its55 pointed out details regarding the timing belt maintenance and mentioned how critical it is for vintage cars, while @spikesx5 inquired about tire age, noting their importance for safety. @gillio831 asked if a smog test would be required for a potential California registration, indicating their interest in the vehicle's compliance with regulations.
Negative: On the downside, @its55 pointed out inaccuracies in the description of the car's wheels, suggesting a misunderstanding about the vehicle’s features that could affect buyer perception. Additionally, there was mention of a dent near the windshield that @kotizakatz decided to leave unrepaired due to potential risks to the original paint, as noted during the car detailing process. These details could be concerning to prospective buyers who prioritize perfect aesthetics in a collector’s vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters have praised the vehicle for its excellent condition, noting it appears to be rust-free and well-presented. @Timzak highlighted that the truck is in fantastic condition overall, while @JaBree1216 simply called it a super clean truck. @MarconiAutoMuseum (The Seller) contributed to the positive remarks by explaining that the owner maintained the vehicle primarily for collectability purposes, which contributes to its great condition.
Neutral: Questions regarding the vehicle's specifications and history were raised by several users. @rustyray inquired about the minimal mileage reported from 2008 to 2025, suggesting the vehicle may have been in storage. @Timzak and @natemc both posed questions about the rear bumper replacement and the white spare tire carrier, mentioning the possibility of a slight rear accident. These inquiries indicate a desire for further clarification that could help assess the vehicle's history and maintenance.
Negative: While the comments were predominantly positive, there were concerns raised about potential issues. @rustyray mentioned a preference for a sturdier brush guard, reflecting a personal taste rather than a quality issue. Additionally, @Timzak cautioned against the potential difficulty of removing pinstripes from the vehicle without damaging its original paint job, indicating a concern about modifications that may affect the vehicle's value or appearance.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments appreciated the vehicle's overall cleanliness and condition considering its age and mileage. @wcs531 noted its clean appearance and thanked the seller for the quality photos. The seller, @sabmiami, responded positively about the car, affirming its well-being after a drive and confirming recent service on the transfer case, which appeared to be satisfactory to many potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters posed questions regarding specific features and maintenance history of the vehicle. @Oregondave inquired about shipping options, while @gofasthobbs suggested that a close-up of the rear badging would be helpful for assessing its condition. Additionally, queries from @Munch1950 and @Fjp041 about the vehicle's transfer case indicated a level of concern among potential buyers, but @sabmiami reassured them regarding its service history, mentioning it looked new during inspections.
Negative: A few comments raised potential concerns about the vehicle. @DrewBush noticed what appeared to be shrinking leather on the dashboard, and @DrWar flagged the beeping sounds linked to fault codes stored in the vehicle. There were tensions in clarity regarding the transfer case status as concerns surfaced over replacement history, with @Fjp041 questioning whether it was replaced by a dealer, to which @sabmiami admitted needing further verification. Overall, these negative notes hinted at maintenance anxieties prospective buyers had about the vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its eye-catching design and performance capabilities. @mef0629 referred to it as a 'fantastic looking gal' and expressed confidence that it would excel on the finish line. @RickPro highlighted the car's driveability and overall quality, while @BobGross appreciated its unique features, mentioning the 'interesting strut cross bar' and engine modifications. @Broovy and @2002dave complimented the photography of the car and noted the excitement for driving videos, emphasizing the stunning visuals and solid performance that make the vehicle appealing. Furthermore, @York expressed a fond admiration for every aspect of the car, and @kgert, who experienced driving it firsthand, remarked on its solid feel, attributing this to the seller's meticulous work.
Neutral: Several comments provided informative observations about the vehicle, touching on its specifications and history. @ewoodhouse, the seller, clarified details about the car's VIN and restoration process, noting the clean title and minor accidents that never left the car undrivable. Other users, like @Darren and @mark_99, engaged in discussions regarding the vehicle's classification as either a 2002 or a 1600, referencing VIN numbers. @Delia_Wolfe commented on the care taken with the car's wiring, noting it as a display of thoughtful craftsmanship. The conversations hinted at a shared knowledge and a community interested in the nuances of classic automobiles, showcasing a blend of nostalgia and curiosity.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns or inquiries about the car's history and specific features. @Disastergrafix questioned whether the car carried a clean title after previous accidents, expressing curiosity about the integrity of its bodywork. @Clamato criticized the absence of iconic badges, questioning the trim details. Additionally, @PhilNiekro pointed out the lack of mention of the sunroof in the auction details, suggesting that may have been overlooked. While these comments did not detract significantly from the overall positive reception, they reflected a level of scrutiny typical among car enthusiasts, highlighting the expectations for transparency in classic vehicle sales.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a beautiful and elegant classic car. @Bri2203 highlighted the allure of the v12 engine, while @mrjirey called it a beauty. @jamessmithy noted its historical significance among Packard enthusiasts, particularly emphasizing that 1934 is considered a prime year for prewar Packards. @boaboyoz echoed these sentiments, praising the shines of the Eleventh Series Packard as splendid. Additional comments from @Gordoninttexas and @cowboy33 praised the car's solid condition and the owner's dedication to its preservation, suggesting that it embodies the best attributes of classic automobiles.
Neutral: The seller, @Trainsplanesandautos, provided a comprehensive overview of the vehicle's attributes and condition, asserting that it has not undergone extensive restoration and is in excellent working order. This included information about the original paint and interiors and the recent refurbishments carried out, such as the brake system and electrical components. Several comments stemmed from inquiries or suggestions about the condition of specific parts of the car, including @BMcD asking for cold start video and @Dairyman commenting on the sound of the v12 engine. The seller acknowledged the need for improved photographs to better showcase the vehicle as highlighted by @berfinroy and @denny6.53, as some felt the current photos failed to reflect the car's true beauty.
Negative: The car's presentation faced criticism, particularly regarding its photography quality. @59turner humorously remarked that the photos looked like they were taken with a 'potato,' and others echoed concerns that the images may detract from potential bids. @Grimsby pointed out that the front seat may have been reupholstered, and @2011SLSAMG confirmed this speculation, stating that while it doesn't detract from the interior's overall beauty, it is noteworthy. Furthermore, @srositano raised concerns regarding the mileage authenticity displayed on the odometer, indicating some discrepancies that could affect buyer confidence. Overall, while the car received numerous praises for its engineering and aesthetic, the concerns raised about presentation and details could negatively impact its auction performance.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @davehondas2000 praises the vehicle as being in incredible condition, highlighting its beauty with comments such as 'Beautiful truck.' @RWN525 also appreciates the truck, noting its capability for heavy-duty tasks by mentioning that it could pull a house down, emphasizing its strength. Multiple commenters, including @Kronix and @9literviper, remark on the truck's beautiful paint condition and unique mods from its era, with @AJL1988 expressing admiration for the aesthetics of the dually truck, particularly its lighting features, and @mrmichael555 echoing this sentiment.
Neutral: @kwoods5 requests information about the service records and the truck's history, expressing curiosity about the low mileage for a 28-year-old vehicle. @gateslimited responds, stating that it is not unusual for a 1-ton dually to have low miles as they are typically used infrequently for specific purposes like towing. @adanac makes several requests for additional media, asking for photos in natural lighting and for a video of the truck running, while praising its beauty.
Negative: @RWN525 raises a concern about the potential gas consumption of the truck, implying it may be costly to maintain. There are also flagged comments, such as those from @flyfaster and @Tshaw01, though their specific content isn't detailed, indicating they may not have contributed constructively to the discussion regarding the vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's striking color combination of silver with an all-red interior, with @Button calling it a "fantastic and timeless combo". @AlohaZ3 referred to it as a "pinnacle Honda product" and mentioned its gorgeous appearance, while @Rodeo expressed love for the unique interior. @Carguy1988 highlighted the uniqueness of the all-red interior, noting that it never gets old. Overall, the vehicle has garnered admiration for its aesthetic appeal, with multiple users highlighting its suitability as a special collector's item.
Neutral: Some commenters raised questions regarding the vehicle's history and condition. @Usd97 sought clarification about the mileage noted on Carfax and questioned the branding of the title, while @Tomcat55 also asked about this branded title. @AlexOCD2022 requested photos of potential damage areas and clarity about the mileage title issue, showing concern over the vehicle's history without being overly negative. Responses from the seller provided context, indicating that the title branding was due to a registration change, offering insights into its ownership history which involved family transfers.
Negative: Several negative comments pointed out concerns about the vehicle's mileage history and title branding. @thall expressed confusion over how the title issue arose despite the odometer functioning properly, and @DD56 criticized the mismatched tires. @pennilesspole remarked on the number of technical owners who seemingly did not drive the car much, casting doubt on the vehicle's usability. These critiques suggest lingering apprehensions about the car's past and raise important questions for potential buyers regarding its reliability and history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the 1967 Fiat 850 Spider, emphasizing its charming design and color. @gh356 praised the early set of headlights and mentioned how they enhance the car's styling and value. @Lotusseven asserted that this is a desirable model, highlighting features like the color and the covered headlights. @rlewis123 remarked on the beautiful lines of the car and the appeal of the slick covered headlights, while @ItalianPerformance echoed sentiments about the car's attractiveness and the value of its wheels, expressing regret over not being able to bid due to already owning a similar model.
Neutral: Several users have asked questions regarding the car's specifications and condition, demonstrating interest in its performance compared to their own experiences with Fiat 850s. @hooper inquired about the RPM at 65 mph and the sealing of the car's top, indicating a desire for specific information. @Shelby_S_Snake requested details about corrosion and the general solidity of the car, while @willrace4beer noted the potential for water leaks when standing still in the rain but affirmed the functionality of the tops during movement. @Marque3333 expressed curiosity about uneven seams on the car, suggesting a past accident, which @Ottoemezzo (The Seller) addressed with details about previous repairs and restoration aspects.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about alterations made to the vehicle. @willrace4beer questioned the need for reinforcing tubing underneath the car, suggesting it could add unnecessary weight, while @Dandanbell58 criticized added components that he felt detracted from the car's genuine character. @Shelby_S_Snake pointed out potential rust on the floor pan, voicing skepticism about the car's overall condition despite its visual appeal. Meanwhile, @macvaugh mentioned recalls for rust issues that Fiat had in the past, highlighting potential long-term concerns.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight the seller's transparency and assurance regarding the vehicle's condition. @turbo3.6 expresses gratitude towards potential bidders and reassures them that the truck has passed the CA smog inspection, emphasizing that it is ready for transfer with no issues for California buyers. The seller encourages bidders to feel confident in their decision, portraying the truck as honest and reliable, especially in light of the current smog compliance.
Neutral: A few comments raise questions about the truck's history and previous inspections, particularly @JK58's mention of CA problems likely due to OBD2 regulations. @turbo3.6 responds to these concerns, indicating that while past issues are unknown, the current smog results are satisfactory and the vehicle is operable. The seller clarifies that they cannot speak to what the previous owner may have fixed but reassures potential buyers that the car is ready for use.
Negative: There are no strong negative comments reflected, but @JK58 does express concern regarding the vehicle's CA problems, which hints at potential issues related to emissions standards. The seller acknowledges this concern indirectly, stating the truck has passed smog checks but does not delve deeply into what may have led to past failures. This leaves some uncertainty about the truck's long-term reliability and history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Juanfuego (The Seller) emphasizes the car's immaculate condition, as it underwent a complete overhaul in 2020, and offers to answer any potential buyer questions. Additionally, @allbikes shares a favorable opinion based on their extensive experience with similar vehicles, noting that the engine sounds normal and is clean, providing some assurance about its maintenance history.
Neutral: Several comments raise technical questions about the vehicle's components. @highinthedirt inquires about the functionality of the A/C and mentions other mechanical concerns, while @antonio0402 corroborates this curiosity about the A/C and the headliner. There's also a note from @Sgt206 questioning the condition of the headliner, showing a general interest in the car's interior and functionality rather than just aesthetics.
Negative: Comments regarding the tires are less favorable, with @donroger1 and @CarFoolLane expressing skepticism about the authenticity of the "white walls," suggesting they may be removable inserts instead of real white wall tires. @MoparMan further critiques the choice of tires, stating that wide white walls are outdated and inappropriate for this model. @Nibo supports the idea that the tires are inserts which could lead to maintenance concerns due to their tendency to get dirty easily.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @K51020Ranch expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, referring to it as a "Nice unit!" and wishing the seller good luck. @GotClutch commented positively on the vehicle's unique blue plaid seat upholstery, emphasizing that it alone makes the vehicle worth it. @boaboyoz called the Blazer "magnificent" and praised its beautiful blue color and lovely build. @caruzn, the seller, described the K5 Blazer as one of the best driving experiences they have had, while affirming their availability to answer any potential questions from interested buyers. @Jonboatowner expressed a strong commitment to purchasing the vehicle, indicating determination regardless of the price.
Neutral: @SCDemonDeac inquired about the vehicle's driving performance on the highway, specifically at a speed of 65 mph. @caruzn responded to the inquiry affirmatively, stating that it drives beautifully and is a great cruiser without any drifting or vibrations. @uncommonman raised concerns regarding the driver's door, noting that it appeared to be misaligned and was affecting the paint on the rocker panel. @caruzn addressed this concern by suggesting that the door itself isn't bent, but rather, the hinges might require some adjustment to improve fitment, offering insight on common issues with similar models such as early Broncos.
Negative: @uncommonman expressed dissatisfaction regarding the condition of the driver's door, questioning if it is bent and describing how the door's positioning caused paint damage to another part of the vehicle. This comment highlighted a potential flaw in the vehicle's presentation that could deter some buyers. There were no other significant negative comments regarding the vehicle, as the overall feedback leaned more towards positive evaluations, although concerns about specific parts like the door can impact perceptions of the vehicle's overall quality.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle for its stunning appearance and potential as a solid investment. @klockwerken highlighted the vehicle's low mileage and sought opinions on its potential market value, while @6thinline9 expressed a preference for this car over new Porsches. @carlo77 called it a 'stunning example,' suggesting it offers an enjoyable driving experience on weekends. Overall, many found the 993 to be an attractive and well-specified car, looking forward to its performance and investment potential.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions about the car's history and condition. @jwilli13 inquired whether the vehicle had ever been tracked due to its connection with Eurosport Racing, while also requesting paint meter pictures. @Ret06Aug17 echoed these concerns by asking about winter driving history and maintenance documentation and the reason for the front repainted. @Sparta72 noted that undercarriage photographs were lacking, indicating a desire for more detailed images of the vehicle's underside to assess its condition. The seller provided clarifications regarding the vehicle's history and maintenance, assuring potential buyers of its excellent care.
Negative: Some comments indicated concerns about the lack of detailed imagery of the car's undercarriage and engine. @Sparta72 criticized the provided photos as inadequate, stating they were taken without revealing enough about the engine. Additionally, @MSahinbas requested comprehensive undercarriage photographs, which highlighted some dissatisfaction with the initial visual presentation of the vehicle. These requests for more transparency reflect a cautious approach from potential buyers who want to ensure they have all the necessary information before considering a purchase.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @PoweredbyFord highlights the reliability and smoothness of the Honda four-cylinder bikes, likening them to a 'Singer Sewing Machine.' They also appreciate the bike's color combination, offering good luck with the sale. @Ozzybud finds the bike beautiful and comments on its original, unrestored condition, particularly praising the original Bridgestone tires and the amazing black finish with multi-color sparkles. @3alarm, recalling their experience with the CB 350 Four from 1973, describes it as the smoothest running motorcycle they have ever owned, noting that although it lacks power, its smoothness is unparalleled. Additionally, @raynekat commends the bike's appearance, describing it as a handsome and incredible machine.
Neutral: @resipsa356 mentions that the bike was hard to find at local dealers, expressing their admiration for the bike that they loved when they saw it new. @MLCNPB asks the seller about the keys for the bike. The seller, @pkight, responds that they have one key available and provides a picture. @neverenoughgold expresses surprise at the availability of a 1974 model CB350, believing it had been replaced by the CB360, while @SunCityMike clarifies that the models were designated differently. @cmh1976 queries the seller about the potential cost of cleaning the tank, noting that it is an incredible bike.
Negative: @Ozzybud inquires if a picture of the inside of the tank will be provided, while @Whipjack raises concerns about the bike sitting in a garage for a long period, questioning what maintenance was performed before running the bike for 100 miles. @MilleMiglia shares a past experience with a similar bike that suffered from varnished fuel inside the tank. They provide a method of cleaning the tank that could be both labor-intensive and necessary. @Ozzybud further suggests that the carburetors likely need disassembly and cleaning due to the fuel turning to varnish, expressing overall concerns about the bike's maintenance history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle, with many describing it as an "awesome truck" and calling it a "beast". @boaboyoz highlights its striking aesthetics by referring to it as a "rockstar red C10" and a "killer build". Others like @MarkNeely and @Beans_Bacon add that it is a "great-looking truck" and the "#1 SWEET C10", respectively, further emphasizing the overall appeal. Several users are clearly enthusiastic about the vehicle's performance and aesthetics, wishing the seller well in hopes of a successful sale.
Neutral: Some comments focus on asking for specific details about the vehicle rather than expressing a clear opinion. For instance, @jrs3484 questioned whether the truck is an original short bed or modified, while @coreyw66 inquired about the type of transmission it has. @CaptJack22 sought further information about the engine and transmission's origins. @donscruisers (The Seller) responded to these inquiries with clear and detailed information, confirming it has a 4L80 transmission and a new GM crate motor, as well as addressing questions about the gas tank capacity and the lack of cup holders.
Negative: There are very few negative comments, but @wishIhadmoremoney raised concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, specifically about rust or rot removal and requested more pictures of the vehicle's areas. This indicates a cautious approach from some potential buyers who want to ensure the vehicle is in good shape before proceeding. Overall, the general sentiment leans more towards positive and neutral remarks, indicating a strong interest in the truck despite minor reservations.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @NVGT350 commented on the vehicle's overall appeal, suggesting that a thorough cleaning could enhance its appearance, labeling it as a nice driver. @valleyfordguy expressed enthusiasm for the model year, noting the mean look of black muscle cars and wishing good luck to the seller. @Warwickblue described the car as looking nice and reminisced about selling their own GT500, indicating a positive impression of the vehicle's aesthetics. @GDogg praised the vehicle by calling it a fantastic Shelby and also wished good luck to the seller.
Neutral: @Billmohl, the seller, responded positively to the comments, highlighting the car's excellent condition and performance. He mentioned that he doesn't drive it often, indicating a desire for someone else to enjoy it. Additionally, the seller provided detailed vehicle specifications and warranty information, showcasing transparency and thoroughness regarding the car's history.
Negative: @knotthead inquired about a driving video, suggesting a possible concern about the vehicle's driving capabilities. @newcarpro provided extensive warranty information but noted the existence of open service actions, which could imply that there are pending issues or recalls related to the vehicle. @vikes8411 questioned the absence of a driving video, hinting at concerns regarding the operational status of the car.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Miatadon admires the car's originality and cleanliness, noting its impressive engine bay and tidy appearance. Another user, @MGBruv, expresses love for the red interior and appreciates the presence of overdrive as a significant advantage. @JimKou (The Seller) shares his personal enjoyment of the vehicle, highlighting its low mileage and the satisfaction of taking it out for special occasions. He emphasizes the car's performance and suggests its conservation due to its excellent condition. @Dexandsqueak shares a sentimental connection to the MGB, reminiscing about a similar car he owned, enhancing the community's appreciation for this iconic model.
Neutral: Comments from @Geof and @MGB6 inquire about practical aspects of ownership, such as shipping and the availability of keys for various compartments. @Johnco poses specific questions about the car's features, including the material of the hood and paint variations, showing an analytical interest in the vehicle's details. @Lofty and @charliebird123 highlight their personal connections to MGBs, suggesting a shared sense of nostalgia and community among fans of the model.
Negative: @JimKou (The Seller) mentions an issue with the transmission not shifting properly, which required professional attention to remedy. @Johnco raises concerns about the vehicle's alignment, commenting on discrepancies observed in photos of the trunk and asking for additional details about potential paint mismatches. The overall tone from commenters regarding these issues is more inquisitive than critical, indicating that while there are concerns, they are approached with a spirit of curiosity rather than outright dissatisfaction.
96ci-Powered 1997 Harley-Davidson Electra Glide Ultra Classic
1HD1DPL3XVY600894
Lot 190229
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed optimism about the vehicle, notably @rexfox who praised the 96 cu in S&S engine as a nice upgrade along with the 18-inch wheels, stating that carburetors are preferred by many as long as clear gas is used. @Quickclaims340 (The Seller) highlighted the bike's clean appearance and performance upgrades, emphasizing that it looks great and delivers speed, ensuring potential buyers wouldn’t be disappointed with its performance. The bike’s aesthetic updates have garnered appreciation, especially from those who favor hot rod baggers.
Neutral: Some comments were more neutral, focusing on technical details and inquiries rather than opinions. @saddlesore pointed out potential issues regarding the motor change and questioned the bike's need for a new motor at 25,000 miles. Inquiries were also made regarding the bike's history, such as whether the frame number matches the title, as mentioned by @rexfox. @Quickclaims340 (The Seller) addressed many questions, clarifying that the S&S motor was installed by the previous owner and confirmed that the aesthetic changes made to the bike were reversible.
Negative: Negative remarks included concerns about the bike's idling issues, as noted by @Meccanica, who was skeptical about whether it was normal for S&S motors to not idle properly. @RidleysRides raised potential problems regarding the receipt for the S&S engine and the lack of documentation like an MSO or Certificate of Origin, which could cause issues during inspections in certain states. Additionally, @saddlesore's earlier mention of the new motor raised questions about the previous owner's competence in maintaining the bike.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the appealing aspects of the vehicle. @Dan_in_Reno appreciates its general cleanliness, stating it is "nice and clean". @mezik notes that the upholstery of the seats looks like it is in brand new condition, showing interest in whether it has been replaced. Additionally, @mgray71 shares fond memories of owning a similar model in the past, expressing nostalgia and a desire for another fun weekend car, particularly admiring the design of the series 2.
Neutral: The comments also include some neutral inquiries about the car's condition and specifics. @dscottj431 points out the condition of the dash, questioning whether it is original, which prompted a response from @rfergason (The Seller) confirming it is believed to be original but without certainty. @PastorofClassics asks whether the air conditioning system works and if it is original or R134a, indicating interest in the vehicle's features, which @rfergason clarifies that there is no air conditioning.
Negative: However, there are some concerns raised about the vehicle. @Dan_in_Reno notes the presence of rust in the spare tire well, although @rfergason reassures that it is surface rust without any rust-through. Additionally, @rfergason acknowledges that both seat cushions had tears but were repaired, possibly leading to questions about the overall restoration quality. Such comments suggest that while the vehicle has appealing features, there are aspects that potential buyers may need to evaluate carefully.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GuyToyota highlighted the clean and well-implemented installation of sound deadening in the vehicle, expressing appreciation for the thoroughness and condition of the car, specifically pointing out minimal surface rust at the rear seat brackets. @nexusautobrokers shared their fondness for these trucks, indicating a community support for the vehicle type. Additionally, @DavidLeeRaleighNC found the vehicle very nice and inquired about the seller's online threads discussing the work done on the FJ60, showcasing interest in the seller's craftsmanship and achievements.
Neutral: @spatial-data (The Seller) responded to various inquiries, explaining the removal of cruise control due to non-functionality and difficulties in restoring it. They acknowledged a comment about repainting, clarifying that the vehicle's current color is lighter than the original and provided photographic comparisons for verification. The seller noted that the original and aftermarket radios are included, and they were open to reinstalling the aftermarket setup if desired, reinforcing their willingness to communicate and clarify aspects of the vehicle's condition and modifications.
Negative: Comments from users like @residualboulders questioned the removal of cruise control, hinting at potential issues with the vehicle's functionality. @kbeatty8 expressed concern about the absence of a new radio and questioned the rationale behind selling the vehicle after so much investment in its restoration. Additionally, @ACRNMNick raised concerns about the lack of pictures of the rain gutter trim areas, suggesting oversight in detailing potential rust issues that could deter potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and practicality, with @GBRBiLL calling it a "Nice looking 90!". @OscarToga (The Seller) elaborates that the vehicle is pleasant to drive, maneuverable, and easy to park due to its short wheelbase, making it suitable for tight spots. Families appreciate its kid-friendly features like the rear door and folding step for easy access. Additionally, enhancements to the cabin such as sound deadening materials make it quiet and comfortable, creating an elegant atmosphere compared to traditional diesel vehicles. The interior refurbishment is noted, addressing common leaking issues found in Classic Defender doors, ensuring a watertight experience.
Neutral: Several inquiries and confirmations also highlight the vehicle's specifications and details. @SharkOfTheWood asked about frame and undercarriage photos, which @OscarToga (The Seller) confirmed are available in the gallery. There were also questions regarding the height of the vehicle, and @OscarToga provided accurate details, noting it stands at 78 inches and fits comfortably in a standard garage. @WAGONBOYTD commented on the fuel efficiency of the petrol engine compared to its counterparts, which @OscarToga explained with assurance about the reliability of the 2.0-liter 4-cylinder engine versus other engine types. The conversation also touched on the vehicle title requirements in New Hampshire, with @smg6 providing the DMV link and @OscarToga clarifying the title situation for classic vehicles.
Negative: While most comments are positive and neutral, there is a slight concern regarding the vehicle's title status. @smg6 mentioned that New Hampshire requires vehicles to have a title, sparking potential apprehension about ownership transfer. In response, @OscarToga (The Seller) reassured that although titles are not issued for vehicles older than 20 years, the registration is sufficient for ownership transfer. He expressed confidence about being able to transfer ownership without issues but there could still be lingering uncertainty among potential buyers unfamiliar with the local regulations around classic vehicles.
40-Years-Family-Owned 1973 Jaguar E-Type Series III Roadster V12 4-Speed
UD1S21932
Lot 190235
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg describes the vehicle as a fabulous E-Type Series III Roadster, indicating a high level of appreciation for its quality. @Capt._Doug refers to it as a beautiful time capsule, suggesting that the car has been well-preserved over the years. @kinglaw also commends the vehicle’s beauty, acknowledging the significant amount of work done to it, which enhances its appeal to potential buyers. Beneath these sentiments is an underlying admiration for the car's aesthetic and historical value, hinting at its desirability among collectors.
Neutral: @bigbob56 expresses that the Jaguar has been stored due to ownership of other cars that were also not in regular use. He elaborates that the car was taken out of a heated garage for auction preparation, indicating a careful approach to maintenance and presentation. Additionally, he answers inquiries regarding the car’s history, explaining its ownership sequence and the reasons behind significant renovations, which adds context for interested parties without conveying strong opinions.
Negative: @lbs raises concerns about the vehicle's air conditioning system, questioning why it hasn't been fixed prior to the sale. This comment introduces doubt regarding the car's operational status and suggests that there may be underlying issues that need to be addressed. @kinglaw also expresses confusion about the extensive work done in 1985, questioning its necessity given the car's relatively new age at that time, indicating that there may be inconsistencies in the car’s maintenance story that could be troubling to potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Corvair1968Owner praised the vehicle, calling it an "OUTSTANDING EXAMPLE!!!" and commended its aesthetic appeal, wishing good luck for the auction. @ainternetguy expressed admiration for the photos and video taken at Stone Mountain park, highlighting the iconic location. @RandD complimented the car's looks, particularly the big wheels, and noted the impressive chrome air cleaner setup, remarking it made the engine compartment visually appealing. Additionally, @Scarlett65 (The Seller) shared their deep affection for the car, mentioning the fun they have driving it and the care they've put into its maintenance since purchasing it in 2018.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification about specific features or details of the car. @SilkyCarnivore raised questions about the turbo boost gauge, while @philvair and @9_Vairs provided insights into the gauge’s functionality, indicating it was standard for certain Corvair models. @Scarlett65 (The Seller) provided further details and additional videos to address inquiries about the car's performance, including a cold start video as requested by @RandD. Overall, there was a blend of enthusiasm for the vehicle's appearance alongside requests for more technical specifics.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns about the vehicle's operation. @RobertLLR cautioned against the clutch use they noticed in the videos, implying it could lead to premature wear. Similarly, @hdkingrider questioned the height of the left muffler, suggesting it might indicate a problem, but @Scarlett65 (The Seller) clarified that Corvairs have a naturally low stance. @dbscpa raised questions about potential rust and structural integrity and asked for further inspection of the rear suspension. There was a general sense of skepticism from a few users regarding the car's mechanical reliability in light of these concerns.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @JagJunkie (The Seller) has shared that he has owned this TR 6 for over 10 years, enjoying its low-mileage condition and original features, such as the Michelin Red Lines and well-maintained interior. Several commenters, including @groceg, expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic, mentioning its attractive color combination and originality, alongside the well-preserved nature of the car, which has been documented with maintenance records amounting to approximately $6,000 in investments. @ima68tr rated the car highly for its condition and preservation, emphasizing its potential for restoration without needing extensive work.
Neutral: Comments from users like @lhunt raised some practical questions about the vehicle's functionality, such as the working condition of the gauges and whether the tires were replaced recently. @JagJunkie responded to these queries, confirming that many components function properly, including lights and wipers, and provided detailed answers regarding the maintenance performed over the years. Concerns were mentioned about the age of the tires, with @Dr.T suggesting they might need replacing regardless of mileage, a sentiment echoed by several users in the discussion about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: On the flip side, some comments pointed out potential concerns with the vehicle, such as @bmwspyder expressing worries about the car's rust-proofing and suggesting a thorough inspection of specific areas for rust. @wally509 questioned the vehicle's limited mileage, indicating a trend of little driving over the last decade, leading to doubts about its reliability for long trips. Additionally, there were commentary threads, including @Dr.T and @groceg, that implied skepticism regarding the authenticity of the mileage and age of certain features, questioning the overall originality of parts like the tachometer and wood species in the dash, thus introducing doubts about the car's true condition and value.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @DRAIDEZ1 highlighted that this vehicle is ideal for those who appreciate speed and style, suggesting that it drives fast with class. Others like @Bruceontheloose described it as a beautiful example of a 70's street racer, while @Mike_Breinin pointed out that the car has great potential and notable engine upgrades, which only enhance its appeal. The craftsmanship and updates made to the car, such as the professional interior and extensive work on the motor and transmission, were also praised by @pgcars (The Seller), indicating a car that has been well cared for over the years.
Neutral: Many comments revolved around inquiries into the vehicle's history and specifics, particularly from @Rob_M1, who questioned the availability of the car's documented history. @Dano3500 asked about original components, while others like @WIZZZZ posed technical questions related to the car's performance and modifications. @pgcars (The Seller) provided detailed responses, explaining modifications, and confirming the authenticity of certain vehicle aspects but noted the lack of documentation for some parts due to personal ownership decisions. The dialogue reflects an interest in understanding the car's background and technical specifications.
Negative: Conversely, some comments had slight negative undertones, like @CBT3 questioning the desirability compared to other models, implying a preference for Buick over this muscle car. Additionally, @BPOTBAM raised concerns about the car's operational dynamics, questioning the necessity of constant throttle input during cold starts, suggesting possible issues with idling. Although the seller clarified that this behavior is due to the vehicle's setup without a choke, it hinted at potential drawbacks associated with the car's functionality.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Chuck246 shared his positive experience after purchasing a low-mileage 2008 Bentley, highlighting that despite a small issue with the seat/control, he absolutely loves the car. He feels that even considering some potential high expenses, it remains a bargain compared to other high-end vehicles. This sentiment echoes the overall admiration for the brand associated with luxury and quality, suggesting that passion for the vehicle often outweighs concerns about upkeep.
Neutral: In the comments, several individuals, including @GMC1948 and @MikeGriese, raised valid concerns regarding the maintenance costs associated with owning a Bentley. @GMC1948 inquired about typical annual upkeep expenses, with estimates cited around $5,000. @MikeGriese elaborated on the potential maintenance needs of vehicles with age and mileage, such as rubber components and fluids which are susceptible to wear, indicating that prospective buyers should carefully review maintenance records for insight into potential costs.
Negative: On the downside, while @GMC1948 and others show interest in the vehicle, they also express apprehension regarding the high ongoing maintenance costs and the need for upfront servicing before long-term enjoyment. This perspective hints at the reality that owning such a luxury vehicle comes with financial considerations that are not to be overlooked, leading to a more cautious view of the overall ownership experience.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments regarding the vehicle highlight its aesthetic appeal and good condition. @rbjazzman describes it as a "Beautiful Taco!" and @Jpunruh agrees by calling it a "Good looking taco." Furthermore, @mshane (The Seller) emphasizes that the Tacoma has been well taken care of, particularly noting that it has avoided the typical rust common in vehicles from the NJ area. The seller is confident in the vehicle's condition, showcasing undercarriage and engine pictures to reinforce the claim.
Neutral: @mshane (The Seller) addresses concerns about the vehicle's undercarriage due to its significant suspension lift. They explain that at dealer auctions, any alterations are noted, and in this case, a frame specialist has verified the truck's integrity. @pro_zach1 inquires about stock wheels or parts for reverting the vehicle to its original state, while @TwoTall brings up the technical complexities involved with the lift, indicating it may not be easy to revert without modifications.
Negative: There are worries among commentors regarding the vehicle's modifications. @CRUSH expresses uncertainty about the heavy lift, and @TwoTall points out that the installation of a 6" lift necessitated cutting for the front cross member, complicating the return to stock. @mshane (The Seller) counters these critiques by reinforcing the value of the truck's customizations but acknowledges the mixed opinions on its modifications.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @JimK expressed appreciation for the color combination of the vehicle, noting that he really likes it. @drdenver, who is the seller, agreed that it is a perfect combo and emphasized that the vehicle appears clean in the photos despite some images suggesting it might be dirty. @Bond001 also praised the color, calling it awesome, while @Chefgordiemac mentioned it's a beautiful car that could last another 100K miles, wishing good luck with the sale. Additionally, @Sonderklasse reminisced about the luxurious interiors of Lexus models from earlier years, expressing temptation to bid on this one.
Neutral: The conversation included inquiries about the vehicle's maintenance, with @cdrusn asking when the timing belt was changed and @drdenver (the seller) clarifying that it has not yet been changed. @Tedlydia asked for details regarding the tires and requested a photo of the tools, specifically mentioning the log wrench, which @drdenver later indicated was not in the black bag. @drdenver confirmed that the tires were manufactured in April 2012 and mounted in September 2013, with all four tires having 8/32" tread remaining.
Negative: Concerns surfaced regarding the age of the tires, with @Tedlydia asking if they are indeed 13 years old, to which @drdenver confirmed. The doubt about the condition of the tires seemed to create an unsettling sentiment for potential buyers. @Coachmule commented a personal financial limitation, stating he loves the car but his portfolio doesn't allow for a purchase at this time, reflecting a hesitation that others may share.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz praises the vehicle as a killer Calypso Coral Bronco, noting its wonderful build. @stevenbrooten echoes this sentiment, highlighting the impressive aesthetics and mentioning the availability of original flooring. @Arfdog (The Seller) shares an affinity for the flooring, indicating its source for the vinyl material, and notes the vehicle's excellent condition. @GotClutch appreciates the mild improvements made for better drivability, specifically referencing the desirable 5-speed manual transmission. @schuh17 calls it a lovely Bronco that isn't overdone, and @solidlifters remarks on its beauty and upgrades, while inquiring about its color history. @lvmorrison expresses interest in the vehicle's hard top, which @Arfdog confirms is removable by standard design.
Neutral: Several commenters raise questions about the vehicle's modifications. @BluesDJ and @ColeTrain both comment on the discrepancy between the front and rear lift heights. @Johnnycab brings up a minor detail regarding the alignment of rear window handles. @ColeTrain also inquires about the Bronco's history, asking if it originally had a solid body or required rust repairs, and mentions a Marti report. @reinvnt asks @Arfdog whether he completed the work on the vehicle himself, suggesting some buyers might want a complete history. @stevenbrooten offers observations on the restoration quality and lift, noting inconsistencies in dimensions observed in various photos.
Negative: Critiques focus on the vehicle's appearance and some specific features. @BluesDJ expresses concern about the 'jacked up front end,' arguing it seems to have a different lift than the rear, which was supported by @ColeTrain's remark that the front looked odd and needed leveling. @Johnnycab’s comment regarding the improper alignment of rear window handles, while minor, indicates a lack of attention to detail in the restoration. @solidlifters also questions the absence of a Marti report, which is typically sought by buyers for authenticity and historical context.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Buyers expressed confidence in the vehicle's condition and history, with @ZBear77 remarking that it appears to be a solid and straight model. The seller, @Foreignmotorcars, noted the Touareg's impressive service history from the same VW dealer since new, which @LSU2020 appreciated. The seller provided reassurances about the vehicle's history, confirming that it has never been smoked in and highlighted that there are no significant rust issues, with general maintenance confirmed by recent service records.
Neutral: Several inquiries pertained to specific details about the vehicle's condition and functionality, indicating that interested buyers were thorough in their research. @Hebrewhammer asked about the age of the tires and the presence of a locking differential, and @Tomswheels requested information about any signs of smoking. @BPOTBAM and @flipphones also asked about the operational functions of the AC and heat, and the history of the brake pads, showing that potential buyers were looking for comprehensive information before bidding.
Negative: There were some concerns raised by potential buyers regarding the lack of records for certain maintenance, particularly about the timing chain replacement, leading @LSU2020 to seek further clarification from the seller. @Joshuaham asked about rust issues, and some buyers expressed hesitation about the completeness of repair records, such as those requested by @flipphones as well as a cold start video to confirm engine condition. These inquiries suggest potential buyers were cautious due to missing documentation associated with the vehicle's service history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the car's excellent condition, with @Dromanucci noting it is a "good looking example" that has been "loved and cared for." @AAAMOTORCARS (The Seller) emphasizes the history of the car, mentioning that it has been in the care of one owner for 45 years and comes with complete documentation indicating its rust-free status. @whipcity76 and @TobinMotorWorks appreciate its robust build and value in the classic car market, stating it is a great example with good mileage that suggests many adventures ahead for the successful bidder, and they draw attention to its stylish design.
Neutral: Several commentators request additional information or clarifications. @greyfoxart and @whipcity76 inquire about the car's recent servicing history and potential underperformance compared to its European counterparts. @DSS10 questions the AC system's R12 compatibility, while @Cab suggests that a driving video would help provide further details about the transmission and differential. @AAAMOTORCARS (The Seller) responds thoroughly to these concerns, offering the opportunity for inspections and confirming that the car has been checked by a factory-trained technician.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism about aspects of the vehicle, particularly regarding its speedometer limitation, as @Jonfrancis questions the utility of an 85 mph speedometer in a car capable of much higher speeds, attributing it to outdated regulations. Additionally, commenters like @greyfoxart raise concerns about specific mechanical components, such as the timing chain's condition. @Cab advises caution based on previous experiences with other vehicles, sharing concerns about the lack of driving videos which complicates long-distance purchases.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @911e30F40 described the vehicle as "Bad ass," and @boaboyoz praised it as a "very bad a$ black Camaro" while mentioning its beautiful build. @wapsirat expressed admiration for the Camaro's look and attitude, particularly appreciating the wheel and tire combination. @Doctodd echoed similar sentiments, calling it a beast of a build, and remarked on the excitement surrounding it with the phrase "GLWTA!" @3WAGERS deemed it a great looking build and anticipated watching the project's progress as it escalates quickly, also wishing the seller good luck with the sale.
Neutral: @jayjj8 requested more pictures of the truck sheet metal and inquired about potential wheel clearance issues if the car were lowered. @Nikosss asked for specifics, including the width and offset of the wheels, and questioned whether the rear end was shortened. @7and8s suggested the seller might have purchased the car from the builder and asked for receipts related to the work done. In response, @Bennyz (The Seller) provided various details, including horsepower ratings of 556 and 580 hp and some insight into the wheel dimensions, though he also mentioned a lack of receipts.
Negative: @MartyKC humorously pointed out that if the black wheels and hub caps were intended to make the Camaro a sleeper, it was not working, as the visibility of the car's features gave it away. @jayjj8 expressed concern over needing more pictures of the truck area and the inside quarters, indicating some potential apprehension about the vehicle's condition. Additionally, there was a query by @OneOfEach about how much rear travel was available before the tires would contact the fenders, hinting at potential limitations in the vehicle's design.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TommyBruin mentions the vehicle as a very nice low miler with an interesting history, wishing the seller good luck. @johnrlaporta notes the uniqueness of the front bench seat, commenting that it's not something seen every day. @G2c2endo (The Seller) highlights features like factory air conditioning and describes the color yellow as attractive. Furthermore, they confirm the presence of power steering, which works perfectly, along with newly replaced disc brakes.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around the details of the vehicle's specifications and options. @CarFoolLane discusses the bench seat not being factory standard and shares insights about the vehicle's history related to delays from a UAW strike. @mtbird66 inquires about the door striping kit, to which @G2c2endo (The Seller) responds by detailing it as a vinyl addition. @PeachStateClassics mentions the stripe's historical significance while pointing out that the trunk mat may be fixed with adhesive, which is a common issue with these models.
Negative: Criticism arises regarding the accuracy of the vehicle's historical claims. @D-S67 suggests that the vehicle doesn't quite match the specifications of a 1967 model and expresses doubts about its authenticity. @Jeepndan questions the vehicle's refurbishment history and whether it had any rust repairs given its advertised low mileage. Additionally, @Finster implores for a driving video, indicating a desire for further evidence of the vehicle's condition and capabilities.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a lot of admiration for its aesthetic appeal and unique build. @FormerlyErock inquired about the color name, noting its great look. @3WAGERS enthusiastically commented on the impressive build, highlighting its favorite color scheme of orange and black, and the appeal of a coyote swap Bronco to high-end buyers. @boaboyoz praised the Bronco as audacious and vivacious, calling it a spectacular build and wishing for a great sale. Overall, many commentators seem excited and impressed by the vehicle's design and modifications, enhancing its desirability among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters have expressed interest in learning more about the Bronco's specifications and features. @Bigvinny asked for a contact to view the truck in person, while @Roostinyfz expressed a desire to see the vehicle firsthand and raised questions about its drivability and features such as lockers and gearing. Additionally, @jg1313 and @Roostinyfz both requested a driving video to better understand the performance of the vehicle. The general tone of these inquiries suggests curiosity and a desire for more detailed information before considering a purchase.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's modifications and potential registration issues. @greal316 inquired about the possibility of registering the truck in California, seeking clarity on any modifications and the VIN stamping. @Oilers also brought up whether the engine has the EPA sticker, hinting at regulatory compliance issues. Furthermore, @jg1313 questioned whether the absence of hoses for the air conditioning affected the heating system, indicating that more information is needed to ensure the vehicle meets necessary standards.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, with @W1seguy calling it a "beauty" and expressing temptation to purchase and drive it home across Canada. @woodyscollectables noted their excitement for the auction and complimented the car's features, expressing particular interest after receiving clarifications from @Tnbusiness71 (The Seller) about the condition and modifications of the vehicle. @Tnbusiness71 also shared positive impressions of the car's driving experience, describing it as a "time capsule" with smooth performance, particularly emphasizing the maintenance history which reflects the car's careful ownership in Japan.
Neutral: Several questions were raised regarding the logistics of purchasing the vehicle, especially about its compatibility with importing it into the U.S. due to a lack of EPA stickers, as highlighted by @chbaxter1, who sought clarity on federalization requirements before proceeding with a bid. @Tnbusiness71 (The Seller) provided detailed explanations regarding the car's ownership history, highlighting its single owner status and comprehensive service records. Additionally, logistical details about shipping costs to various Canadian locations were discussed, with @Tnbusiness71 providing options for transport and encouraging potential buyers to reach out regardless of their location.
Negative: There were concerns about the cost of maintenance for the vehicle, as @bmwspyder mentioned that maintaining a V12 can be quite costly, which led to a discussion about perceived maintenance expenses. @59turner raised skepticism regarding the desirability of a Japanese car in Canada that resembles an American model, questioning its resale value. @Doc1965 sought assurance that all maintenance had been performed, and there were additional inquiries about cosmetic issues like the condition of the headlights and whether marks on the mirror could be buffed out, reflecting some apprehension about the vehicle's condition.
|
|