Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the Cheetah, emphasizing its unique design and historical significance in racing. @Dake noted that it was a great day for vintage racers on BaT, while @FiatsFTW called it "freaking cool". Many commenters, including @billyblyth and @Gettin_old, expressed their nostalgia for the car's legacy as a vintage race car, mentioning its rarity and stunning aesthetics. The Cheetah is also seen as a symbol of American racing heritage, with @Colin Comer highlighting its storied history and how it stands among the most well-known competition cars.
Neutral: Several comments attempt to clarify details about the vehicle's specifications and provenance. @Ferraris-Online (The Seller) provided context regarding the car's history, stating it is the original paint and addressing questions about its gas tanks, confirming the configuration to potential buyers. Discussions like those by @GregJ and @19us66 touch on historical aspects and connections to racing memories linked to the Cheetah, making it a topic of interest not just for potential buyers but for enthusiasts reminiscing about past experiences with the car.
Negative: Not all comments were fully positive, as some expressed skepticism about the car's identification and history. @Speed10 raised concerns over documentation and serial numbers, questioning the accuracy of claims regarding the Cheetah's lineage. This skepticism is echoed by @jmlshowdown, who emphasized the need for potential buyers to view the car in person before making bids. Additionally, @T_towner indicated uncertainty about the Cheetah's specifications, highlighting ongoing debates within the community about its authenticity and classification.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @SDSprint expresses no doubts about the 1966 Shelby Mustang GT350H, highlighting the Sapphire Blue as the perfect color, while @Tom_S. also praises the great colors of the vehicle. @neav4522 notes the GT350Hs as a dream car spec, and @BabyD69 describes the car as the prom queen, adding charm to its appeal. Many comments, such as those from @boaboyoz and @CollectorCarClub, emphasize the car's stunning looks and history, with @Wingsmack calling it sensational and gorgeous, also recognizing its fascinating backstory. There’s widespread admiration across various commentors for the vehicle's aesthetic and its rarity, particularly in its color combination and historical significance.
Neutral: Many comments seek clarifications regarding the vehicle's details, such as @Dlenaker asking about the last repaint, and @JettJolene suggesting that it seems to have no troubling stories. Both @kevinckb6 and @SBCARGUY engage in discussions about the rarity of automatic transmissions in GT350Hs, clarifying that only a small number were produced with manual options. Additionally, @christophernkennedy and @scott1221 raise concerns about steering wheel vibrations, with some commenters attributing this to age-related issues like worn tires or suspension components. Multiple users request documentation confirmations and encourage further transparency to ensure prospective buyers feel informed about the car's originality and condition.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks about the car's appearance and history, several commenters express concerns about mechanical issues. @shelbybuff points out vibrations in the steering wheel during demonstrations, prompting questions about the suspension's condition. Commenters like @christophernkennedy and @Thomas54 suggest that the shaking might be related to mechanical problems that need addressing, while @revron and @Pete offer insights on potential causes related to tires and alignment issues. @KBonTX criticizes the seller's driving video for not showcasing the car's performance, while @christophernkennedy calls for rectifications, creating a narrative that raises doubts regarding the car's mechanical reliability despite its visual appeal.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors shared a lot of enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its performance and aesthetic appeal. @nwoods95 remarked on the impeccable condition of the car, while @its_mine reminisced about the thrilling experience of driving at 6300 RPM, emphasizing the skill required to handle such a vehicle. The seller, @Wob, expressed his satisfaction with the car, recounting enjoyable drives and noting its reliability. @The_Dude_Abides, an S2000 owner, praised the 2003 model, noting it as his favorite, and @justanotherstranger echoed similar sentiments about the car's greatness, declaring that these vehicles are incredible and should be treasured.
Neutral: Several comments provided factual insights into the vehicle's mechanical status and care considerations. @mikeyoung00 pointed out the AP2-specification valve springs installed in 2023, ensuring long-term reliability while mentioning common issues in older models. @scootrb4 questioned the mileage discrepancy for the listings and @Wob explained that BaT rounds up mileage, clarifying the minimal miles added since the last sale. Additionally, @Wob encouraged bidders to reach out with any questions and mentioned inspection availability, fostering a friendly and informative auction environment.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding the car's handling characteristics. @Blue_Horseshoe noted that the shifter might have a bit of a shake during higher-speed driving. @maw06 shared a personal experience of driving an S2000 with a turbo installed, indicating that such modifications might lead to a loss of grip and control at higher RPMs, advising potential buyers to appreciate the car's original design. Overall, while general sentiment was positive, these comments highlighted the potential risks and challenges associated with owning and driving a high-performance vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @alaskossie described the vehicle as a "dark, dark automobile" and @jcg5591 echoed that sentiment by affirming its all-black aesthetic, while @Quik944 humorously noted how difficult it is to perceive its shape due to the intense blackness. The sense of excitement around the car continues with @GDogg calling it a "good looking 968 Club Sport" and @L1V1C sharing their enjoyment and satisfaction with the car they own, emphasizing its balance and fun driving experience. The seller, @eurosportimports, is proactive in engaging with bidders, showcasing the car's quality and readiness for enjoyment post-service, which further adds to the positive perception of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters have sought clarification on the full options available for the vehicle. For instance, @kennyschachter was one of those asking for specific option details, and @js968 sought information regarding the build data and differential status. @mattcoshaw provided insight into the car’s balance and specifications, explaining aspects of the suspension and related options, providing a neutral perspective on the model’s performance traits without strong emotional investment.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @6sigma, appearing skeptical about the modifications made to the vehicle's suspension and differential, questioning the timeline of when these changes occurred. Additionally, @ppacker pointed out a possible cabin rattle heard in the drive video, raising doubts about the car's interior finish quality. Moreover, @kennyshachter expressed frustration at the seller's unresponsiveness regarding his inquiries, indicating a minor negative experience during the auction process as well.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commentators have praised the vehicle, highlighting its remarkable condition and restoration quality. @boaboyoz describes the Florida 3000 Mk II as an 'absolutely fabulous' example, while @TomInTampa emphasizes its exceptional paint job and the vehicle's comprehensive restoration as a 'complete package.' @HealeyRick notes the advantages of its Paul Tsikuris restoration, which brings great value to the vehicle, and @threeducs3 expresses admiration for its vintage gauges, while @MNberg mentions the supporting documentation that adds to its worth. Overall, there is a consensus that this Healey is a standout in both performance and aesthetic appeal, greatly enhanced by its rich history of care and maintenance.
Neutral: Several comments reflect on personal connections and the car's history rather than strictly evaluating its qualities. @MillerD, the seller, shares emotional insights about the car's significance within his family for over six decades. Despite its sentimental value, there are also discussions about the technical aspects of the vehicle, such as the unique features of the fender mirrors and the transmission details discussed by @tonyfeb14. Comments also touch on the car's transitional characteristics, with @sliproc providing insight into its position between the distinct roadster and convertible camps.
Negative: There are a few critiques shared, particularly regarding specific features like the gear shift knob's placement (@Bob_Brennan) which could frustrate new users. @threeducs3 mentions a preference for the cowl lip to be painted a different color for authenticity. Concerns are also raised about potential buyer interest due to the vehicle's unique classification within the Austin Healey community, as pointed out by @sliproc. Overall, while there are commendations for the car's aesthetic and history, some commenters express reservations about minor details and market desirability.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @RidingHigh compliments the vehicle on its gorgeous navy color and expresses curiosity about its future. @GDogg praises the Night Blue over Luxor interior, highlighting the comfort of the 18-way power seats, which he considers top of the line. @justwhatever mentions the beauty of the color and suggests wrapping the gray support beam in black for a cleaner look, while @boaboyoz calls the Targa 4 GTS a scintillating specimen and expresses wishes for a successful sale.
Neutral: @USMMA inquires about the history of the paint protection film (PPF) and its condition as it approaches 10 years old, seeking insight into its preservation. @rdelgado asks if the car's paint is all original and raises questions about any significant blemishes or imperfections, requesting paint meter readings to assess its condition further. @69_911e points out the vehicle's enticing options, contrasting its price with the new model 992.2 T4GTS, indicating that this car is a more attractive alternative.
Negative: @bcdallastx (The Seller) admits to not having a paint meter to provide precise readings of the car's paint condition, which may leave potential buyers wanting more information. @80-Topdown comments that the car would look better with silver wheels, suggesting that the current wheels detract from its overall appeal; however, he also notes that changing them is an easy fix. @bcdallastx acknowledges the suggestion for silver wheels and regrets not making the change when the car was new, indicating some dissatisfaction with its current wheel color.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg calls the 500E a gorgeous vehicle, highlighting its significance in Mercedes-Benz history. @Ceci describes it as a "unicorn" and commends its amazing condition. @Alykozmo reminisces about a personal connection to the car and considers it one of their all-time favorites. A comment from @JSNY reinforces this sentiment, praising the car and wishing good luck with the auction. Furthermore, @Incaico (The Seller) expresses regret over having to sell the car, detailing the extensive care it received to maintain its high standard, emphasizing its performance and comfort.
Neutral: Various commentators, including @schwarzauber and @SockPuppet, discuss the car's design aspects, comparing it with other models in the E-Class line and acknowledging its Porsche connection. There's also mention of the rarity of specific colors (‘bortnite’ and ‘malachite’), with @SockPuppet providing insights into the registration of European imports in California. The discussion reflects a shared understanding among enthusiasts about the model's unique traits, showcasing both admiration and a practical approach to ownership.
Negative: On the other hand, @Frank_Barrett offers a critical perspective, asserting that the later E55 AMG models outperform the 500E while being more affordable. Additionally, @duuder points out that the 400E lacks the direct Porsche involvement that characterizes the 500E, sparking some debate within the comments. While most comments are supportive, this viewpoint introduces a more skeptical angle regarding the car's performance when compared to its successors.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Schmima2 commented on the vehicle's "Slick spec!" and several users appreciated the striking color combination of Watkins Glen Gray and red interior, with @RPOLS5 mentioning it as a great color for the ZR1. @Basil2000 also praised the stunning color combo, noting the impressive appearance with red brake calipers.
Neutral: @usjepecl, the seller, provided detailed specifications and option codes of the vehicle and engaged in conversation with potential buyers. In response to @boat3's inquiry, they confirmed the car was a company car at GM and shared details about previous oil changes and the car’s condition, emphasizing their intention to sell it as part of a ZR1 collection. @curtkall questioned the substantial mileage increase, to which the seller clarified that the vehicle was initially part of GM's fleet before being registered privately in Michigan.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns regarding the vehicle's history, with @boat3 expressing curiosity about the lack of a Carfax history, while @curtkall seemed puzzled by the rapid mileage increase from 5 to 11k within days. @Pcleez made a lighthearted remark about the seller's decision to cover the plate, implying someone might discover the VIN, hinting at potential privacy risks.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TacosTacosTacos commented that the seats are beautiful, showing a positive impression about the vehicle's interior condition. @MonteMotors provided reassurance regarding the paint and bodywork, confirming that they are in perfect condition following a recent restoration. Additionally, @MonteMotors clarified that the air conditioning is functioning well, blowing cold air, which suggests that the vehicle is well-maintained and comfortable.
Neutral: @Chamba mentioned that the seats are wrapped in cling film, which suggests they are in pristine condition. There were inquiries about the vehicle's graphics and several commentors including @Spiegs and @rmoundry sought clarification on whether these are removable stickers or paint. @MonteMotors consistently provided updates, responding directly to questions about the vehicle's specifications and features, such as the mileage which was confirmed by @Berend15 as 160,824 kilometers.
Negative: Commentors like @HelenReady raised concerns about the vehicle's performance in a driving video, stating that it seemed sluggish and that the driver may not have been proficient in stick-shift driving. There was apprehension voiced by @TacosTacosTacos regarding the lack of photos of the seats before they were covered, which could have given a better idea of their condition. Additionally, @Ibis250 pointed out a potential alignment issue with the vehicle, raising doubts about its upkeep.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Cmoore74 is the seller of this '99 Miata and emphasizes its excellent condition, having been owned by an elderly couple and garage-kept throughout its life. Commenters like @jim07044 and @Spider_Mike laud the car's cleanliness and fun driving experience. @Paul_B describes it as a beautiful rust-free example, indicating that it has likely been well cared for.
Neutral: @Cmoore74 provides details about the car's mechanical state, such as the timing belt and recent maintenance performed. The seller has mentioned that the vehicle is a federal version with a single catalytic converter, as confirmed by @SDCR. Several commenters inquire about the car's service records and previous maintenance, indicating a proactive interest from potential buyers.
Negative: @WickedGood raises questions about the timing belt change, hinting at a potentially expensive maintenance issue due to the car's age. Additionally, @Uby67vw1958's comment was flagged as non-constructive, suggesting some disagreements or skepticism within the discussion. Overall, the concerns appear to revolve around the timing and maintenance history rather than serious issues with the car itself.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The 1987 Porsche 944 Turbo is receiving a lot of admiration for its low mileage and appealing specifications. @GDogg describes it as a 'super cool low mileage Black beauty,' while @Ghosty emphasizes the exceptional low mileage of only 36k, commenting that there can't be many 944s in the U.S. with such low numbers. There are several mentions of the vehicle's desirable features, including sport seats and a limited slip differential, which @AndyF007 highlights as approvals for great options chosen at the time of purchase. The seller, @silverarrowcarsltd, showcases their engagement with potential buyers, promising more photos and updates throughout the auction to enhance the experience.
Neutral: Comments regarding the car's past and technical specifications reveal a mixed understanding among potential buyers. @bmwspyder inquires about the condition of the clutch and whether the tires have any rubbing issues due to lowering springs. @daman410 raises concerns about the authenticity of the wheel setup and the presence of certain original options, illustrating that some buyers are looking for deeper verification of the car's claimed specifications. Additionally, @NSXcar discusses past experiences seeing the car in a different collection, noting small flaws like a rear hatch seal separating, which are typical for a car of this age.
Negative: Concerns also arise regarding modifications and potential hidden issues. @Burnsy949 points out that the car hasn't passed California smog regulations, suggesting modifications might be necessary to comply with state standards. @DKH8 asks if the performance chip can be removed and whether stock parts are available, casting doubt on the car's originality. The presence of an aftermarket alarm discussed by both @jfeldman4 and @Dons968 raises worries about future reliability, as aftermarket installations can cause issues over time. Overall, potential buyers exhibit caution, always looking for clarifications on discrepancies which indicate that while the car appears to be well-crafted, uncertainties remain.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The 987 Porsche Boxster in Speed Yellow is receiving enthusiastic praise from multiple commenters. @GP1393 enthusiastically notes the excellent upgrades and unique color of the vehicle, labeling Speed Yellow as the best Boxster color. @Ananymous944 also expresses excitement about the car, indicating a shared appreciation for its aesthetics. The seller, @thedash, highlights the rarity of Speed Yellow Boxsters in the market and mentions extensive recent maintenance, further reassuring potential bidders about the vehicle's condition and road readiness.
Neutral: The discussion surrounding the Boxster involves various opinions about the auction and general vehicle insights. @TheRealJakeMalloy remarks on the frequency of Porsches being sold after short ownership, prompting @texredr to share their experiences with owning a Boxster and a BMW Z4, indicating the emotional enjoyment these vehicles provide. Additional queries regarding specific vehicle maintenance, such as the serpentine belt and undercarriage conditions, show an engaging dialogue among potential buyers about the vehicle's history and upkeep.
Negative: Doubts and concerns are also present in the comments, with @TheRealJakeMalloy expressing worry about the maintenance costs associated with owning a Porsche, mentioning high prices for standard services that could become a financial burden. Commenters like @mbrana question the reason for selling a seemingly nice car, prompting @thedash to reflect on their personal journey with the vehicle, suggesting a bittersweet sentiment towards the sale. Moreover, @Cordarion's inquiries about signs of rust indicate a cautious approach from potential buyers, highlighting common concerns regarding older models in varying climates.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ablue69 expressed a fondness for the vehicle, highlighting its classic status as a '66 and mentioning his nostalgic memories linked to the show 'Green Acres' where the car made appearances. @boaboyoz and @GV1390 both characterized it as a beautiful example, with @boaboyoz emphasizing its delightful qualities. Furthermore, @vice777 noted the striking appearance of the red color, stating that it certainly pops, which aligns with the overall appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic.
Neutral: Several commenters acknowledged the vehicle's condition and distinctiveness, including @RxRick who mentioned that the Bronco looked clean and inquired about the stock status of the front grill, which indicates an appreciation for authenticity among collectors. Similarly, @Chapter2 remarked on the rare Sahara Beige color but also complimented the current red on black combination, suggesting that the vehicle's appearance is commendable. @CascadeHawkeye also noted the challenges of driving it on the day of the photoshoot, which adds a layer of respect for the vehicle's capability and appeal.
Negative: On a critical note, @JohnnyB77 raised a concern regarding the speedometer, questioning whether it was original to the 1966 model or replaced with a later version. This comment suggests a concern about authenticity, reflecting a common aspect of collector culture where original parts can significantly affect perceived value. Additionally, @RxRick's inquiry about the front grill indicates some uncertainty about the vehicle's modifications, hinting that not all commenters are completely satisfied with the current state of the car.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Streeter expresses nostalgia, stating that the vehicle brings back old memories. @vershum, the seller, recalls fond times spent with the vehicle, sharing that it holds significant memories from his childhood. Other commenters like @CaptainOver and @imanut2 also reminisce about their first experiences with similar models, highlighting the emotional connection these vehicles fostered.
Neutral: @imanut2 mentions that the vehicle is in good condition and asks if the paint is original, reflecting interest in the bike’s history. @Kiffer850 shares their own experience of riding a similar bike, indicating a personal connection to the model. Furthermore, @vershum clarifies that the bike is in Honda candy gold color but is not the original paint, which adds to the knowledge of the vehicle's specifications.
Negative: @Sleistiko questions the logistics of shipping the bike to Montana, which may reflect concerns about the practicality of purchasing it from a distance. @Sparrownaut shares doubts about selling a cherished item from 1972, implying that parting with such a nostalgic piece can be difficult. This sentiment is echoed by others who express their attachments to similar bikes, highlighting the challenges of letting go.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Daspyda highlights the vehicle’s potential for transformation with simple maintenance tasks such as a timing belt service and body work, making it an attractive option for daily driving, car shows, and other activities. The mention of its low mileage and two previous owners, along with a history of extensive records, contributes to the appeal of the car as a well-cared-for unit. @daddsun expresses enthusiasm about the local availability of the car on BaT, suggesting it will be an enjoyable project for the next owner.
Neutral: @doletron provides factual clarification regarding the car's wheels, stating that they are not turbo wheels and noting the differences between the rear widths of turbo and non-turbo configurations. @Daspyda responds by acknowledging this distinction, emphasizing that the term 'Turbo wheels' applies to both configurations but that the non-turbo models maintain a single size.
Negative:
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @XH2Oskier praises the car, calling it the best in its original condition and color. @FltRisk shares a nostalgic experience with the same color car, highlighting its great torque and performance. @CamaroUSA1 (The Seller) provides videos and detailed descriptions confirming the car presents like a new showroom vehicle, which excites potential buyers such as @mobey, who appreciates the collectible nature of all three model years.
Neutral: Commenters like @Jack-Porsche acknowledge this may be one of the lowest mileage examples, while @newcarpro offers a contrasting point about other low-mile examples previously listed. @Skiv expresses a differing opinion on color, indicating a preference for another model. Meanwhile, @gauldingr and others ask for detailed information about the vehicle, such as tire date codes and walk around videos, reflecting a common interest for transparency in vehicle condition.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism about aesthetic choices. @mo8ius and @Skiv criticize the car's color, with @Skiv calling it ugly and expressing a desire for alternative models. @Thindor questions why a vehicle with such low mileage hasn't been driven more, questioning its practical appeal. Additionally, @Intimidator04 engages mockingly with @Skiv regarding personal preferences, indicating a divide on opinions around beauty and practicality.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Tobyallen expresses a newfound appreciation for the fawn beige color of the vehicle, calling it a sign of maturity and good taste. He finds the car attractive and expresses enthusiasm with a 'GLWTA'. @Walterroadking and @Coronette also appreciate the color combination, agreeing that it's the best for a C1 model and mentioning its sophistication and beauty. @22truckie admires the old car's condition and praises the seller for taking care of it, believing it could be a survivor candidate with proper inspection.
Neutral: Several commenters suggest that the vehicle's undercarriage needs attention. @JagRRR questions the visibility from the provided pictures and suggests a lift inspection. @ken77 notes the undercarriage looks scary and implies it may have rust. @Bordeaux mentions that while there is a bit of rust, it is manageable and comments on the absence of an engine suffix picture, though he appreciates the color. @TimTech highlights the Virginia location as a potential rust magnet, which is a concern for him.
Negative: @Autohausbraun finds a rust spot, indicating potential issues with corrosion. @Pryso points out possible cobwebs, questioning the low mileage since the seller purchased it in 1984. They suggest minimal use in recent years despite the exterior looking nice. @JJR7 inquires about past paint jobs and engine rebuilds, hinting at worries about the vehicle's inner workings. @Dasher16 expresses doubt about whether all functions such as signals and gauges work, suggesting there might be hidden problems.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ButWhatDoIKnow highlights the vehicle's quality, describing it as a "very nicely equipped T Bird." Additionally, @bwhite141 (The Seller) mentions that the overall interior is in excellent condition, with only minimal wear noted on the driver's seat and pedals. The seller has provided additional pictures upon request, showcasing the vehicle's soft top and overall appearance, which may add to the appeal for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in constructive discussion regarding specific aspects of the vehicle. @GLWTA inquires about the replacement of the 8 coil on plugs, referencing common emission failures for the model years 2002-2005. @jneuenburg offers practical advice on replacing coil over plugs and mentions the ease of maintenance, suggesting that the vehicle's performance can be managed with relatively inexpensive aftermarket parts.
Negative: @HenriT expresses concern about the wear on an 8000-mile car, questioning the overall condition of both the interior and exterior. The inquiry about whether the tires are original raises issues about their condition, especially since @bwhite141 (The Seller) acknowledges some cracking despite the tread holding pressure. Although the seller provides images and reassures the condition of the tires, the need for repairs such as the coil on plugs and potential tire replacements may deter some buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @googi56 (The Seller) mentions that they've spent over 10k on the car and that it runs and drives beautifully, indicating strong investment and care. @57ChevyJohn, a previous buyer and seller, encourages the seller to stay engaged and to add more information and videos, suggesting that the vehicle is appealing and worth showcasing. Additionally, @morgannut points out the valuable feature of a matching Parade Boot cover, highlighting unique aspects of the vehicle that could attract buyers.
Neutral: There are several requests for videos from users like @Ventdest31 and @ChapmansKato, noting that showing the top and windows in operation or a simple demonstration of the car's functions could significantly enhance the listing. @iamcharliejudd shares a personal experience related to VIN discrepancies that emphasizes the importance of correct documentation, mirroring concerns raised by others about the already noted VIN issue. @googi56 (The Seller) has communicated that the listing has been updated to correct the VIN and other details, showcasing responsiveness to feedback.
Negative: @CORVAIRWILD raises a valid concern about correcting the VIN error before sale, pointing out that discrepancies might cause issues with registration in certain states. @DocMGL expresses skepticism about the overall condition of the vehicle, asking if it requires significant bodywork and repairs to essential features like the AC and radio, indicating potential concern over the car's state. @chazzzer criticizes the color description in the listing, asserting that the convertible top color contradicted the stated information, adding to doubts about the listing's accuracy.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its stunning build and meticulous details. @johnnyvett, representing the seller, shared excitement about the auction and continuously highlighted the car's craftsmanship. @trainknine expressed being speechless at this amazing build, while @e9er complimented the wide body design and wheel combination. @TheBerthaCar offered congratulations on an impressive build and detailed listing, indicating a thorough job. Several users, including @64Cdn043 and @Vishnu69, noted the car's beauty and outstanding design, with mentions of its engine and custom features further solidifying its appeal. The sound of the engine was a significant highlight for many, with @09zo6pj remarking on its sweet exhaust note and classic vibe.
Neutral: There were practical discussions regarding the specifics of the vehicle build and function. @305max raised questions about the tire width and other specifications, receiving informative responses from @johnnyvett, who clarified details about the car's tires, bushings, and engine specifics. This exchange contributed to a knowledgeable atmosphere among bidders. Comments from @SMTMMF provided anecdotal insight about the car's impact at shows, giving potential buyers a sense of the vehicle's standing in a community of enthusiasts without expressing a personal stake in the auction. The dialogue maintained a professional tone, demonstrating a shared interest in the vehicle's qualities and specifications.
Negative: Not all discussions were entirely positive, as a few comments raised critiques. @305max expressed skepticism about certain aesthetic choices, comparing them unfavorably to other vehicles, though his remarks were flagged as non-constructive by the forum moderators. It seemed that while many appreciated the build, some maintained an analytical perspective, questioning the details like control arm bushings and engine modifications. Overall, however, the constructive criticism was minimal compared to the overwhelming positivity surrounding the car's auction presentation and its desirability among classic car enthusiasts.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @grayner expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, describing it as a nice unit worth the money. @hpizking reminisced about their own experience with the same model, highlighting its fun and capable nature while noting how easy it is to drive. They emphasized that owning such a unique vehicle, with a limited number available in the U.S., ensures it will maintain great value, wishing good luck to potential bidders.
Neutral: @Carneed, the seller, provided detailed information about the 2018 Mercedes-Benz G550 4x4², mentioning its impressive original MSRP of $234,795 and the factory options that come with it. They also informed potential buyers about the tax collection requirements for Illinois residents and offered assistance with shipping logistics and registration for out-of-state buyers. @Seaate20 engaged with @grayner, encouraging bidding and casually stating that they are not particularly attached to any model they have seen.
Negative: There were no negative comments regarding the vehicle. Most comments were either positive or neutral, focusing on the vehicle’s qualities or sales process.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle for its impressive build and history. @gumby74 described it as 'awesome,' while @CharlzR highlighted its preparation and the tasteful design choices made by the owner. @Colnago commended the owner for resisting the urge to add unnecessary markings, emphasizing that the car is a serious build that exceeds standard specifications. The car's rarity and quality have generated excitement among potential bidders, with comments referencing its established racing pedigree and performance capabilities, such as @Craig_S, who noted the car's proven performance. Overall, the sentiments reflect admiration for both the car's aesthetic and engineering excellence.
Neutral: A number of commenters expressed inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and legal status for street driving. @Bobby817 questioned whether the car could be titled and driven on the street, to which others clarified that it can but requires some modifications for full legality, such as adding headlights and wipers, as pointed out by @twb930s. Additionally, there were discussions surrounding previous modifications, including changes made to the suspension and engine components. @Wob (The Seller) encouraged potential bidders to communicate their questions and expressed a commitment to transparency regarding the vehicle's condition and history during the auction process.
Negative: Despite the positive comments about the vehicle, some users raised concerns. @hammondo pointed out the need for modern safety updates, suggesting that the car should have a proper roll cage and containment seat due to the outdated safety setup. @scuderiaferrari expressed confusion over why a high-powered engine was not dry-sumped, indicating potential oversight in safety standards. Additionally, others noted the possible limitations in vintage racing class eligibility due to modifications, with @1HTSOB_67 mentioning trouble finding suitable classes for a stroked engine. These comments suggest that while the car is appreciated for its performance, its compliance with modern racing standards could be an issue.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @lanierchris, the seller, showcases a deep passion for Land Cruisers, highlighting his expertise and dedication to preserving these vehicles. He describes the 1997 Toyota Land Cruiser GX-R Limited as a meticulously restored and one-of-a-kind model with exclusive features such as dual fuel tanks, rear air conditioning, and a striking Sand Gold exterior. The seller emphasizes that the truck is fully compliant with federal regulations and has been thoroughly serviced with careful maintenance by the previous owner and enhancements made for sale, promising reliability and performance for the buyer.
Neutral: @MayoQuaker inquired about the truck's history in the U.S. and requested additional photos of specific components, including the front axle and any signs of leaks. @lanierchris responded promptly, stating that the truck had spent less than a year in the U.S. and that it has been well-prepared for sale with no current leaks, although a small oil pan leak was previously fixed. The seller committed to providing more photos as requested, evidencing an open line of communication and transparency.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns that may affect potential buyers. @Chesslesson noted the absence of a CARFAX report, which may contribute to uncertainty about the vehicle's history given its Middle Eastern origins. In addition, @Sabath asked about the presence of cruise control and any prior usage, expressing concerns over potential odors or smoking history. Despite the seller's assurance that the truck is clean and non-smoker, these inquiries reflect a level of apprehension from some commenters regarding the vehicle's condition and history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Nickrau praised the vehicle as a "Sleeper! Very nice ride:" and @parshooter complimented it as a "Nice Mustang and nice mods", wishing the seller good luck with the sale. Additionally, @tjkdk asked if there would be a cold start and driving video, indicating interest in seeing the car in action.
Neutral: @SASSYGT informed that the original Ford window sticker can be found in the Carfax report attached to the listing. @tjoseph2000 provided an explanation regarding the oil pressure, clarifying that the oil pump's bypass valve allows for variable oil pressure depending on the engine's condition. @elrush10 noted that a video of the vehicle bears a strong resemblance to the listed Mustang and suggested a connection with the receipts mentioned.
Negative: @tjkdk expressed concern about the low oil pressure seen in a picture, questioning its consistency. @Z50GUY inquired about the installation of the Roush supercharger and the associated EOD number for California smog, which implies a need for clarification on modifications and legality.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed how much they appreciate the vehicle's character and aesthetics. @JLsKA510 mentioned it has 'lots of character' and described it as a 'great little wagon.' @Nismo_Native declared that it 'has rizz,' highlighting its appeal among younger audiences. @7c777r admired its patina, stating that these wagons look even better in person, while @David_P praised the wheels and graphics, conveying a sense of love for the car. The Seller, @Pelon76, shared how enjoyable the car is to drive and emphasized the importance of style in its design, which resonated positively with the audience.
Neutral: Several comments focused on aspects of the car that require further clarification or attention. @svatem inquired about the manufacturer of the front seats, showing interest in further details about the vehicle's features. @frankj351 asked about the braking system, which reflects a common desire among potential buyers for detailed mechanical information. @Stagehand shared a belief in preserving the vehicle's natural wear and tear, likening cars to people who earn their scars and shared insights on the appropriate carburetors for optimal performance. @Pelon76 provides some background information about the engine and past media features, aiming to inform interested bidders.
Negative: Some comments highlighted potential concerns regarding the vehicle's cosmetic condition and functionality. @AliceAustin remarked on what appeared to be bullet holes, showing a mix of admiration and concern for its rugged appearance. @groceg pointed out that while the original paint carries a charm, rust could become an issue over time. @longroof510 suggested that the rear tires might be rubbing against the body, indicating ongoing challenges with the vehicle's fitment. Furthermore, there were discussions about needing performance upgrades, with @parshooter suggesting focusing on performance over cosmetics, signifying a divide on priorities among viewers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @LS-Wan shares a very positive perspective on the Camaro, emphasizing his enjoyment over nearly a decade of ownership, appreciating the garage-kept condition and thorough maintenance records. Commenters like @FuelInjectedFaith also express their admiration for the car, noting its clean appearance and eagerness for more visuals and sound captures. Overall, the community seems excited about the vehicle's features and performance, highlighting its ease of driving and enjoyment during road trips, as noted by @LS-Wan.
Neutral: Several comments raise practical questions regarding the car, like the factory radio's functionality and the condition of specific components, showcasing a mix of curiosity and caution about the vehicle's history. @TAjefe and @SWEQS inquire about the reasons behind the ownership changes and maintenance details, reflecting an interest in the car's past without any evident negativity. @posetong also asks about scratches and potential rust issues, demonstrating a vigilant attitude from potential buyers who seek reassurance regarding the car's condition.
Negative: While there is overwhelming positivity, some concerns emerge from comments like those from @TAjefe and @posetong, who question repairs and the number of owners the car has had. @TAjefe specifically mentions a replaced quarter panel and requests transparency about that incident. These questions, while respectful, highlight a cautious approach by potential buyers regarding any hidden issues that might not be reflected in public records like CarFax. @posetong expresses his intent to understand the car's history thoroughly, revealing that some buyers might be apprehensive despite the seller's openness.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express excitement about the vehicle, with @LookBabs highlighting its 5-speed, 2-door setup as appealing. @Sebring mentions that it's on their list despite concerns about rust, while @salesmotorcars praises the seller for providing honest pictures, suggesting the car is likely better than described upon viewing. @Cevangel (The Seller) shares their positive experiences with the vehicle, stating it's been fun to work on and drive, and @NiallsShortbear appreciates the look of the steel rims over alloy options. Comments from @Cevangel (The Seller) confirm the reliability of the fuel injection and 5-speed manual, which generates interest.
Neutral: Comments indicate a mix of opinions and suggestions from various users. @Cevangel (The Seller) communicates openly about the auction process and the condition of the vehicle, responding to inquiries about the transmission and inspection options. There's discussion about missing parts and whether the wheels listed match their descriptions, with @gsarahs pointing out that alloy wheels are included despite some disagreement with @mgb2. Additionally, @rbroederer raises concerns about a title error, which @Cevangel graciously addresses, showing a commitment to transparency.
Negative: Not all feedback is positive, as @JPB60 criticizes government regulations related to vehicle design, referencing bumper mandates. @Cevangel (The Seller) acknowledges the issue with the vehicle's title and has taken steps to resolve it, apologizing for any confusion. Concerns about rust are also mentioned, particularly by @Sfohr, who expresses a desire for more clarity regarding the condition of the car, indicating caution among potential bidders. Overall, while there is strong interest in the vehicle, there are notable concerns about its condition and licensing.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm and optimism about the vehicle. @Wrayg praised the car's design and handling, calling it one of the best shapes ever and sharing fond memories of their first restoration. @laverda noted that the auction looks like a good deal for someone, suggesting potential improvements for hot climates. Sellers like @squigmon highlighted the positive comments received and willingness to assist potential buyers, indicating a strong community support for the restoration efforts.
Neutral: Several individuals commented on the vehicle's condition and restoration possibilities. @tim_t pointed out the vehicle's solid starting point and original condition, making it a great project for those interested in restorations. @P30 shared their experience with MGA coupes, revealing a personal connection and confidence in the car's design. The general consensus suggests that the car requires time and skills to restore, which many believe could be a fulfilling endeavor.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition were raised by some commenters. @P30 mentioned the need for welding due to rust issues and the challenges involved in the restoration process. @gsarahs spoke about their personal experience with restorations that turned problematic, which led them to seek a fully restored vehicle instead. Such comments highlight the potential difficulties and commitment required in bringing this car back to its former glory.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly appreciating its unique design and performance. @bradtompkins described it as 'Very cool,' while @hadll454 called it an 'Unbelievably cool car'. @SPITX praised the craftsmanship with 'What a great build!' and @e34nut shared excitement over the rarity of a Baur in Golf, adding that he loves the car. @jimmymhoward playfully dubbed it a 'chick magnet,' and many others echoed their admiration by highlighting the modifications and specifications, indicating a strong appreciation for the seller's efforts in creating a standout vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments provided additional context about the car's features and the seller's reputation within the community. @bayarea2002driver noted the S14 engine bottom end and questioned if @VintageBMWdude would contribute insights about owning a 2002 with this motor. Commenters discussed the aesthetics, such as the euro turn signals, five-speed manual transmission, and suspension upgrades. Particularly, @TerrySayther (The Seller) engaged with commenters about the front bumper assembly and clarified details about the air dam's color, indicating a willingness to provide further information about the car's build.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters expressed mixed feelings about specific aspects of the vehicle. @masterqi mentioned a preference for the original Baur style, suggesting that some fans may not be as excited about this modified version. Additionally, @pdxgasman pointed out that the front spoiler seemed to be a different color, questioning its authenticity. @firstinline raised concerns over whether the car was originally a Golf color, noting discrepancies in the paint job, including red overspray. @groceg humorously speculated on opinions about the no-sunroof design, implying that it might not resonate with all potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Chris_F (The Seller) describes the Panoz AIV roadster as an excellent vehicle with just over 2,000 miles that is freshly serviced and ready for enjoyable driving. He mentions that driving the car has been "super fun" and that it garners a lot of positive attention, especially from fans of the brand. @DanPanoz shares a complimentary review after examining the car at the Panoz facility, noting its impressive condition and the strong factory support for parts and service, which enhances the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: Several potential buyers, including @Civilguy and @DPSeven, ask clarification questions about the car's dimensions and door functionality, which @Chris_F (The Seller) responds to in a friendly manner. He provides specific dimensions of the car and assures that the doors operate smoothly. The conversations reflect a sense of curiosity and the desire for additional details about the vehicle, indicating that the sellers are engaged and accommodating to inquiries.
Negative: Concerns are raised by @Speedster13 and @shyduke regarding the car's maintenance and potential issues due to its limited usage over the years. @Speedster13 inquires about seal and gasket conditions, while @shyduke worries about possible fogging or gearbox problems due to infrequent driving. However, @Chris_F (The Seller) provides reassurance by stating there have been no leaks or operational issues during his ownership, addressing these concerns directly.
2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata 3rd Generation Limited Edition 6-Speed
JM1NC25F460101931
Lot 192346
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express their love for the vehicle, with @tvrbob mentioning their own experience with a similar car, noting the changing perception of these models over time. @bhawktr3 (The Seller) highlights practical features, such as a removable console cover that enhances driving comfort, while @gdspc and @satxgeo rave about the appealing color, Velocity Red, and the emotional connection many have with their Miatas, referring to it as a strange addiction. @Button and @sar10 also share positive sentiments, describing their fun driving experiences and bond with the car.
Neutral: @bhawktr3 (The Seller) addresses specific inquiries regarding the vehicle's features and condition, confirming that it has a lug nut adapter and clarifying potential concerns about a mark in the interior. Some discussion revolves around the visual details, such as the wheel photos and ignition key discrepancies, with @Mx5NC and @TAH_Tiger raising points that prompt explanations regarding factory specifications. Additionally, there are exchanges about the car's history, including engine replacements, with @ericskeith5 seeking clarity on invoices related to such maintenance.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the condition of the vehicle, particularly by @SmittyNC who questions whether the car has been smoked in due to a potential ash mark. @TAH_Tiger points out confusion regarding similar wheel images, questioning the accuracy of the representation in the listing. @drcarter007 expresses hesitation about transitioning to the NC model, implying possible apprehension about its differences compared to older models, showcasing that while many love the car, there are still reservations and discussions about its authenticity and condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have expressed a strong appreciation for the Macan GTS, describing it as an exceptional all-around vehicle suitable for both city and highway driving. @sb27 highlighted its versatility and safety, stating it's the best choice amid increasing congestion and challenges on the roads. Others, like @skl48, also praised the driving fun the GTS offers, especially with the air suspension enhancement. Additionally, @mbeitler1 noted that the Macan has become a preferred option over sports cars like the 911 due to practical driving considerations, reinforcing the idea that this SUV blends fun and utility perfectly.
Neutral: Some commenters provided neutral observations regarding features and the market context. For instance, @mbeitler1 pointed out that the Sport Chrono Pack is available as an option rather than standard, while @lovebread reminded everyone about the standard Porsche Surface Coated Brake (PSCB) for this model year. Additionally, @Masokol711, the seller, conveyed the vehicle's excellent condition and enjoyment of ownership but did not go into details about its usage history earlier in the conversation, prompting questions from other users regarding its maintenance and winter usage. These neutral insights help in understanding the market and the vehicle's capabilities.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns or pointed out potential negatives. @Tearminator was curious about the undercarriage condition, implying worry about wear from winter driving, suggesting a caution towards the vehicle's treatment. Furthermore, @TristanvG voiced discomfort about the lack of communication from the seller, questioning the absence of comments or videos as the auction neared its end. Additionally, @bishopking expressed disappointment about the vehicle's location, hoping for a more accessible option given the road conditions in their area. These negative remarks indicate a need for reassurances about quality and transparency from the seller.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CRP64 praises the car as a beautiful vehicle and expresses hopes for a good sale, indicating that it deserves a long-term caretaker. They share detailed knowledge about the car's specifications and registration requirements, emphasizing the importance of the matching numbers for authenticity. @Tom_S. reflects on the emotional aspect of selling the car after 55 years, likening it to letting go of a beloved family member and hoping it finds a good home. @mdipierro (The Seller) mentions that the car has improved significantly over the years thanks to a reliable mechanic, highlighting its drivability and recent enhancements.
Neutral: @Buzzandsue raises concerns about the condition of the windshield, asking if there is a crack, and questions the material used on the dashboard, which leads to further discussion among commenters about the dash covering and whether it was a good renovation choice. @BluesDJ agrees that the dash looks fine, reminiscing about similar material used in their own vehicle. @fogone also notes the fuel pump's unusual location, which leads to a discussion about the vehicle's specifications and overall condition.
Negative: @4RE_LOVER points out a possible area of rust on one of the wheels, inquiring about its authenticity and condition. @mdipierro (The Seller) confirms the existence of a crack in the windshield, clarifying that it has not worsened over 20 years and admitting to a rust issue on one wire wheel that he attributes to neglect. While he offers reassurance regarding the rest of the vehicle, these comments indicate concerns about its overall maintenance and potential need for repairs.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous enthusiastic reviews from commenters who appreciate its unique features and low mileage. @MiloWeb7 (The Seller) described it as a 'unicorn' due to its rare specification and excellent condition, highlighting the fun driving experience it offers with its mid-mounted Toyota engine and manual transmission. @GotClutch praised the Aquamarine Pearl color and the car's low mileage, also inquiring about the timing belt and T-top seals, which @MiloWeb7 confirmed to be in perfect condition. Comments from @eshum and @Celicagt4 noted the car's unusual combination of features, emphasizing that it appears well-cared for and sparking interest in modifications.
Neutral: Several users engaged in discussions about specific technical details and general vehicle information. @bengalmagick asked for clarification on whether the engine is turbo or non-turbo, with @Need_A_Trailer confirming it is non-turbo based on visual indicators. @JimK provided insights about the vehicle's interior, clarifying potential color confusion and commenting on the added OEM rear strut tower brace. Multiple commenters, including @ASEMasterTech, questioned the vehicle's maintenance history and sought assurances regarding the condition attributed to its low mileage, which @MiloWeb7 addressed by referencing the car fax report.
Negative: However, there were some concerns raised about the vehicle's condition and its history. @Pdman47 pointed out the presence of rust on the bottom of the car, suggesting this could be problematic despite the vehicle's low mileage. @RJR questioned the legitimacy of the title, noting inconsistent details regarding the license plates and expressed concern about missing lug nuts on the front wheels. @DeTomasofradiavolo suggested that another component needed repair, which adds to the concerns regarding the vehicle's overall condition as it ages, regardless of its low mileage.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have fond memories of the Husqvarna bikes, recalling their popularity during the 70s and earlier years. @crazy4cars described the vehicle as a beautiful example, while @ktmb shared nostalgic thoughts of riding Huskys in the Oakland hills with his brother, noting their reliability and solid performance. @Demoodmai reminisced about hanging out at a bike shop that sold European off-road bikes, highlighting the emotional connection people have with these iconic machines.
Neutral: Several users engaged with the seller regarding logistical questions. @DannyWilde inquired about shipping to France, and the seller, @Goodwoods, responded that they would figure it out if the auction was successful. @GV1390 also asked for a cold start video, which reflects the general curiosity and interest in seeing the bike in action before making a purchase. Others noted historical references to the bike's origin and early introduction to the U.S. market, suggesting a communal appreciation of its legacy.
Negative: On the downside, there were concerns raised about the bike's condition and presentation. @Slinkert pointed out what appeared to be the front fender mounted backwards, while @DesertSled73 humorously noted that it could lead to mud splashes on the rider. @alskin referenced a common criticism about the fender orientation, suggesting a need for clarity. Additionally, a note from @bringatrailer clarified that the bike had not been started since the completion of work, potentially casting doubt on its immediate usability.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @jarllewis highlighted the E38's desirability and aesthetic appeal, calling it one of the best-looking cars from Germany, especially in contrast to newer BMW models. @maringuy praised the 740i as the ultimate V8 road car, while @aabbccddeeffgg expressed a strong attraction to the vehicle's look and the allure of this soon-to-be classic BMW. Comments from @jgraham and @maw06 also emphasized the positive aspects of driving experience and maintenance care, suggesting that the car has been well-maintained and provides a great experience on the road.
Neutral: @ultimateM3 (The Seller) provided a detailed list of maintenance completed on the car, including the timing chain service and new tires. The seller mentioned that the car is rust-free and accident-free, while also acknowledging that it has some minor blemishes typical for a 24-year-old vehicle. Additionally, various users inquired about features such as the instrument cluster comparison with the M5, and the navigation system's specifications, indicating a mix of curiosity and interest regarding the car's technical details without strong opinions on them.
Negative: @bajanbmw raised concerns about the visibility of the car's paint job in the auction photos, citing potential issues with the 'B' pillars and spark plug covers. @gwill740 and @erikallenking also inquired about possible oil leaks and radiator problems related to the vehicle, reflecting concerns over potential hidden maintenance issues that could affect the car's performance. Furthermore, @pizzaman09 noted past maintenance expenses with similar vehicles, hinting at the financial commitment required to maintain such models, which could deter potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @a410traveler expresses enthusiasm, stating that the 1965 Riviera is their favorite year and appreciates the gold paint and interior. @Dollycat3 admires the vehicle's beauty and color combination, while @lincolnsandcaddies echoes this sentiment, praising the car's appeal. Additional positive feedback comes from @TJClassic, who shows serious interest in the car and compliments its characteristics. The seller, @playadrifter, shares fond memories and pride in owning the car for over 18 years, noting its cleanliness and preservation.
Neutral: Several comments inquire about the vehicle's features and condition without expressing strong opinions. @Mdv62 requests chassis photos, while @greg_selvidge asks about the A/C functionality. @dschuett seeks to schedule a viewing, and @Cruisin4Classics inquires about service records and suggests how the seller might enhance the listing's visibility. The seller provides clarifications regarding the A/C system needing work and confirms the vehicle's rust-free condition, indicating its long-time residence in a dry area.
Negative: @kink56 laments the neglect of A/C system restoration among classic car owners, pointing out a perceived lack of priority. @buickboy63 raises concerns regarding the potential replacement of vinyl beneath the glove box and the dash pad's fit, which undermines the car's authenticity. Additionally, comments suggest that the current bidding is low and urge the seller to take action to attract more attention to the vehicle, with @DeanBean advising that the current bid is insufficient for a car of this quality.
One-Owner 2019 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 Convertible 3ZR 7-Speed
1G1Y43D91K5802010
Lot 192356
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Saleen07 expressed admiration for the Kalahari interior and top, highlighting how well they complement the red exterior of the vehicle. @MaguireMotorcars complimented the classic appearance of the combination of red exterior with tan accents, referring to it as one of the most classy setups available. @ernhart333 pointed out the exclusivity of this car, noting that it is a '1 of 1' model with its unique color and interior configuration, suggesting that this rarity adds to the vehicle's desirability and value.
Neutral: @3100LS34ever (The Seller) introduced the auction and responded to potential buyers, assuring them that he would be available to answer questions honestly. He explained the car's background, noting that it was driven minimally by its single owner and provided technical details about its specifications and build. Comments from various users, including @Oldwood and @manofmanuals, emphasized the market value considerations, suggesting that the vehicle needs to be priced competitively to attract buyers, indicating recognition of the vehicle's potential while also noting the care required to maintain its condition.
Negative: Some constructive criticism arose regarding the vehicle's condition and presentation, as @3100LS34ever (The Seller) communicated delays in completing the detailing work due to unexpected challenges. He acknowledged that some imperfections were present, such as minor scuffs on the front spoiler that needed touch-ups, leading to concerns from onlookers about the car's overall presentation at auction. @kenvaleri highlighted that the vehicle would need to be priced higher than $250K for a successful sale, indicating doubts about meeting market expectations unless substantial detailing and promotional efforts were effective.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Jordan_Tenenbaum expressed admiration for the vehicle, indicating that the stunning W140 has tempted him to sell his own Volvo XC70. @redrx7 highlighted the car's build quality and noted the beautiful color combination of silver over black, along with its low mileage and well-preserved interior. They also appreciated features such as the trunk release and the 5-speed transmission, which enhances the driving experience. @mcqueens confirmed the car has passed inspection and is clean, easing potential buyers' concerns about title status or future registration issues.
Neutral: @DelawareAutos raised a valid concern regarding the implications of a rebuilt title on registration and insurance, to which @mcqueens effectively replied that the title is clean. @911c4s provided personal experience with rebuilt title cars, emphasizing that insurance companies like Progressive have no issues with them. @317 pointed out potential discrepancies with the mirrors, suggesting they could be from other model years, but overall found the car to be in good shape. Additionally, @CorradoG60 commented on the potential for title branding issues but also noted that a properly repaired vehicle could still be a great deal.
Negative: @BrokenAdam made a humorous jab at the car's wheels, indicating they might not be favorable. @Scott_S critiqued the idea of buying this car for a young driver, suggesting that it may not be the most practical or safe option compared to newer models with safety features. @Jonfrancis raised questions about the overall condition of the car, mentioning potential cracks and odors, and sought clarification on the vehicle's HVAC system operation. @Jake529 remarked on the price, suggesting it could function well as a 'winter bomber' but might not be ideal for everyone.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz appreciates the exceptional build quality of the Chevrolet COE tow truck, calling it "all sorts of amazing" and an "EPIC and extraordinary build." @Cmoetrucks praises the restoration efforts with a thumbs up, while @tlcamg expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle's character and the seller's vision, noting that even the wrecking yard photos evoke happiness. Many commenters seem impressed with the truck's overall aesthetic and functionality, highlighting its coolness and unique characteristics.
Neutral: @PALC requested specific dimensions and details about the vehicle, such as overall length and weight, the possibility of removing the wrecker unit, and its cooling system specifications. @brianshack (The Seller) provided accurate measurements and answered questions regarding the vehicle's drivability and compatibility with towing equipment, indicating that the truck could be driven across the country without issues. This exchange reflects a willingness from the seller to clarify details for potential buyers.
Negative: @craZee humorously comments on the air conditioner not blowing cold, suggesting it might be a political issue. @DMCperformancegarage inquired about any leaks or existing problems, expressing concern over the truck's maintenance, while @mtcarnt asked about the highway cruising speed, hinting at potential uncertainties related to its performance. @brianshack acknowledged minor issues such as a small transmission drip and power steering that needs attention, which may concern prospective buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Slam105 praises the rarity of the Honda in the US, highlighting it as a well-restored example of this unique model. @austin_alfa also acknowledges how rare it is in the States and appreciates the design evolution of Honda's post-war styling, implying that a collector will be thrilled with it. Additionally, @MrHonda1948 commends the difficult restoration achievements and emphasizes its value for true Honda collectors, suggesting that it would make a fine addition to any collection.
Neutral: @Mouse51 expresses curiosity about the model's engine type, questioning whether it is a flathead. @Stugotz99, in response, clarifies that the model is OHV with an 8 hp engine, while @T-Ray and @aintgotnogasinit debate the engine design further, confirming it is not OHC. @Jwilly, the seller, engages with these inquiries, providing additional information about the model's rarity and history in the US.
Negative: There are few critical comments; @T-Ray incorrectly assumes the engine is flathead, which has been contradicted by other users. The confusion surrounding the engine type has led to some disagreements among commentors, but overall, the sentiment remains positive about the bike's rarity and condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @FXRcR1 praises the vehicle for having intact accoutrements, noting that it is a rare find. They express admiration for the beautiful design of the Aston Martin Vanquish, and suggest the YouTube channel Bamford Rose for more content on such cars. @David993S also shares their appreciation, calling the car a stunning early Vanquish. @DetailDave (The Seller) responds to @FXRcR1, expressing gratitude for the acknowledgment of the factory goodies included with the vehicle, highlighting how those small details make a significant difference.
Neutral: @02hoe engages with @DetailDave about the vehicle, asking specific questions regarding the tire date codes and the number of keys or fobs available. @DetailDave (The Seller) provides prompt responses, confirming that there are indeed both sets of keys and providing the date code for the tires as 2018, installed in January 2020 with minimal mileage. Additionally, @ElfoZ3 inquires about the car's service history, indicating their possible interest in selling their own DB9. @DetailDave responds by uploading service record photos which he initially had trouble getting uploaded.
Negative:
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @SethSW describes the vehicle as a "holy grail" and expresses a desire to win the lottery to acquire it, while also wishing the seller luck with the sale. @TheRube praises the truck's 12 valve engine and unique four-door configuration, calling it a "unicorn" and a "nice rig." @VictorWhitacre appreciates the 3 pedal setup combined with the 12 valve engine, stating that it is almost the perfect vehicle for him, and he would only sell his own truck for something similar. @DaWizard reminisces about his experience with the truck, mentioning it was his first pickup and highlighting its quality. @CRUSH comments on the impressive sound of the engine, comparing it favorably to a different model they own.
Neutral: @RottenLeonard (The Seller) clarifies an inquiry about the engine block by stating it is a good five block and explaining that the presence of the 53 block has been a topic of varied opinions. The seller also emphasizes that the only modifications made to the truck are an exhaust brake and a boost gauge. @Jtc1227 chimes in to share their experience with the 53 block, confirming its existence in '98 12 valve trucks and offering supportive comments about the truck's quality. @Mopar53 questions whether the truck should be classified as a Club Cab instead of a Quad Cab, prompting a neutral discussion about the distinctions between these terms.
Negative: While the comments primarily contained positive feedback and neutral inquiries, there was some confusion regarding the vehicle's classification. @Mopar53 noted a potential mislabeling of the truck's cab type, suggesting that it may not be a Quad Cab as claimed by the seller. This implies a possible misunderstanding that could affect perceptions of the vehicle's value or authenticity. However, no outright negative comments were made regarding the truck's condition or performance.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed great admiration for the vehicle, with @smankin calling it a "gorgeous specimen" and @hairtrigga exclaiming it to be "outstanding!" The seller, @Bugulup, echoed this enthusiasm, mentioning how excited he was to receive the car and highlighting its jaw-dropping color. @Roth517 referred to the M6 as a beautiful car, and @clawson9 described it as simply stunning, indicating a strong consensus on the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and condition.
Neutral: Some comments focused on the details and history of the vehicle. @thetrailer mentioned that the car hadn't been driven much by previous owners and noted its long-standing presence in the auction market, implying a unique opportunity for potential buyers. @thkfast pointed out the absence of fog lights in US spec models, and @GinBP inquired about the GPS updates, suggesting practical concerns that buyers typically consider. @Jsjwc asked for updates regarding the safety inspection, while @bugulup provided clarifications on the vehicle's upkeep and original tire conditions, revealing a dedication to transparency about the car's history.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's ownership and inspection issues. @bbrs pondered the fact that the car had four owners over ten years, questioning why it hadn’t found a committed owner earlier. @jsal253 requested information about the vehicle's failure to pass the safety inspection, highlighting potential red flags for interested parties. Although the seller, @bugulup, responded promptly to these inquiries, the discussion reflected possible hesitations among buyers about the car's past. Overall, while the car has many positive attributes, there are lingering doubts regarding its ownership history and past inspection challenges.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed a sense of nostalgia associated with the vehicle, reminiscing about family trips and good times. @BEPLA suggested that someone should pair it with a '72 LTD Convertible for a unique experience. @haolePete fondly recalled riding in the 'way-back-in-the-back' with family and pets, showcasing how these vehicles brought families together during memorable outings. @Discobob mentioned how fun it would be to ride in the rear-facing bench seat, while @CobraVic11 expressed how the vehicle took them back to their childhood, eliciting warmth and happy memories. Overall, the vehicle seems to evoke strong, positive emotions tied to family experiences.
Neutral: The seller, @TucsonFutureClassics, provided essential information regarding the vehicle's history, clarifying that it had remained in the same family for 52 years. They also explained the TMU (True Mileage Unknown) designation while emphasizing the care taken by the previous owners in preserving the car. @BrianAlex showed interest in verifying the seat functionality and the possibility of an in-person inspection. Another commenter, @Hackberry, noted that this vehicle was previously sold at a lower price, indicating that it may have appreciated in value. @BobGrob asked about the vehicle's sales history, prompting @Rpharesjr to clarify that there were no hard feelings regarding the previous auction outcome.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns or expressed disappointment. @tamc1112 inquired whether the previous auction's winner lost any money due to backing out, indicating potential issues regarding negotiations and expectations. @MasterDebator's lighthearted comment about wanting to sing a song didn't resonate with the topic's seriousness. @Mcm91 suggested modifications that may not align with everyone’s appreciation for the vehicle's preservation, and the vehicle did have a TMU designation, which could be a red flag regarding its authenticity. Overall, while many enjoyed reminiscing about their experiences, there were underlying questions about the vehicle's status and condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Andrew37Chevy commented on the vehicle's appearance, stating, "Nice looking Unimog and a nice project." This comment highlights a positive impression of the vehicle's aesthetics and potential for restoration. @EuroTechOne mentioned that with proper care, the project's focus on the brakes could be manageable, indicating confidence in the vehicle's overall condition. Additionally, @mmcallister noted that despite the current brake issue, the emergency brake still functions for maneuvering, suggesting that the vehicle is still operational in some capacity.
Neutral: @GregT raised an inquiry regarding the vehicle's history, asking if it was a movie rental or a standard rental for the public, which reflects an interest in its background without expressing a strong opinion. @Valkyrja and @EuroTechOne contributed to the discussion about the vehicle's brakes, sharing insights on their ease of repair, further supporting the idea that while there are issues, they may be straightforward to address. Additionally, several commenters discussed specific parts and dimensions of the vehicle, like the missing slats for the cargo canvas, confirming that the vehicle requires some work but also has the potential for easy restoration.
Negative: @mmcallister (The Seller) pointed out a significant concern about the vehicle's brakes, stating they have lost fluid and are currently non-functional. This could pose a serious safety risk and indicates that immediate repairs are necessary. @Tritt34 asked for the overall dimensions of the vehicle, implicitly highlighting the importance of understanding its size before making a decision. This could suggest uncertainty or hesitance from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's suitability for their needs.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @PrivateCollectionMotors indicated enthusiasm about bringing the vehicle to auction and encouraged potential buyers to reach out for any inquiries or inspections prior to the auction's end. Their assistance extends to shipping options for out-of-state buyers, showcasing a commitment to customer service and support.
Neutral: @Dave_W raised pertinent questions regarding the vehicle's features and condition, such as the installation of tow wiring, functionality of air suspension, and requests for underside photos. @Npielly7 expressed interest in identifying the specific model version of the vehicle, displaying engagement with the auction process.
Negative: @snelson203 pointed out that the Range Rover lettering on the bonnet requires attention, suggesting a need for cosmetic improvements on the vehicle. @robertdwyer inquired about a previous inspection reported to Carfax, hinting at concerns over the vehicle's history and urging transparency regarding its past condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @FYbodluvr shared their enthusiasm about the vehicle, describing it as a great looking and fun car that offers the best value for money. They expressed that they've owned multiple C5 Corvettes and love them, indicating a strong satisfaction with the model. Their comment highlights the aesthetics, performance, reliability, and overall enjoyment of driving the car, suggesting it stands out compared to others in its class.
Neutral: Several commentors, including @dbleoh7 and @Ewa-Beach-TRW, requested more details about the vehicle, such as additional photos, close-ups, and inquiries about the functionality of various systems like air conditioning and transmission. @Shaggysleet, the seller, responded to these requests promptly, adding more pictures and acknowledging the nature of the car's upkeep with general maintenance having been performed, although no independent records were kept. The seller also addressed concerns regarding accident history, asserting that it was a minor incident.
Negative: @Philphyll raised concerns about the vehicle's mileage and the history of an accident, prompting further clarification from the seller. @freedomride noted visible signs of paint repair in one of the photos, which could suggest quality issues with the vehicle's cosmetic restoration. Other comments indicated uncertainty about the car's condition and history, such as potential mileage discrepancies mentioned by @Ewa-Beach-TRW, indicating apprehensions from potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its rarity and beauty. @c0rbin9 notes the uniqueness of the 199 Black Pearl Metallic color, suggesting it is a rare find among W123 models. @kzcan admires the vehicle's preserved condition, pointing out even the seat storage nets are intact. @Bmyers5525 expresses a genuine interest in acquiring the car, emphasizing it has a story, and @KYOB and @KensKars805 both simply agree on the car's beauty, with @KensKars805 even mentioning a personal connection with the same model.
Neutral: The Seller, @OvertonAutomotive, engages with multiple commenters, providing clarifications and additional information about the vehicle. They address questions regarding the condition and features such as the air conditioning compressor, which was replaced in 2020, ensuring potential buyers have accurate details. @Oldlady asks reasonable questions about the sunroof and air conditioning functionality, which demonstrates a thorough interest in the vehicle's performance.
Negative: There are some minor concerns raised in the comments, such as @Oldlady's inquiry regarding a vacuum schematic and the vehicle's features. @Pappy6060 asks about a rattle noise noticed in the driving videos, suggesting that potential buyers are cautious and looking for assurance about any mechanical issues. @cforswall noted confusion about an editing mistake in one of the pictures, indicating possible quality control issues with the listing.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle, a 2000 AM General Hummer Hardtop Wagon, has drawn praise for its thorough upgrades and quality parts, with @Ignoramoose noting the significant lockers as a major plus for utility. @elmarkeyiii (The Seller) expresses excitement about sharing the auction and highlights the joy of owning and maintaining the vehicle, which he describes as a masterpiece. He mentions its great condition, smooth driving, and fun experiences on trips, adding that the truck is sporty in corners, providing a sense of enjoyment in driving.
Neutral: Several commenters have engaged in discussions about the vehicle's specifications, with @Sahara19 inquiring about its overall height and tire conditions. @XXX79 recalls past experiences with H1 Hummers, sharing insights about engine issues related to certain models, while @mrangel333 questions the extent of body damage repairs. As for the auction dynamics, @CollinsinNC suggests that bidding usually intensifies in the final hours, indicating potential for a higher final price than initial bids.
Negative: While the overall sentiment is positive, some users have pointed out areas for improvement or concern. @Ignoramoose mentions the need for bushings and suggests that the latest receipt containing a list of recommendations should be addressed for transparency. Additionally, @RScollection raises concerns about the vehicle's low-speed performance, asking for a video showing higher-speed capabilities and reporting perceived rattling sounds. @jpunch comments on the bench seat's suitability, indicating limited comfort for adults, which may deter potential buyers looking for spaciousness.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed interest in the vehicle's originality and condition, with @fedewab (The Seller) providing numerous details about the car's history and maintenance. The seller clarified that the vehicle underwent a significant rebuild in 2009, including mechanical updates and upgrades that enhance its performance. There were also reassurances given about the functions of the gauges, with confirmation that all gauges work properly, and the seller posted a video of the dashboard without cracks as well as driving videos showing the car in operation. Additional photos were shared, including pictures of the interior and under the body, to further affirm the vehicle's quality.
Neutral: Some commenters raised questions regarding particular details of the car, such as the age of the tires, which @MGB6 pointed out were 16 years old or potentially older based on code dates. @alemoyafonn inquired about interior pictures, which @fedewab (The Seller) promptly provided. The seller also offered context about the car's past use, mentioning that it was mostly garaged and stored after limited use for maintenance. This information was well-received, adding to the transparency surrounding the car's condition.
Negative: However, there were concerns voiced, particularly regarding the age of the tires and potential rust. @BeeManGT3 inquired about tire date codes and possible rust on the car, while @Electra-glide highlighted a worry about the air conditioning system, asking for potential repair costs. @fedewab acknowledged these points but mentioned that while there is no significant rust, there is some surface rust on the exhaust. The uncertainty surrounding the AC's functionality remains a potential issue for prospective buyers living in hotter climates.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters are impressed with the vehicle, labeling it a beauty and expressing that it could be made perfect with some minor modifications. @thefleshrocket notes that the quality of presentation for this X50 is a complete turnaround compared to a previous car they inspected, saying it looks fantastic. @twoturboz appreciates the specifications, emphasizing the excellent color, transmission, and matching gauges that make this car stand out, while @PorscheTeam suggests it should be a six-figure car, indicating high demand and value for such models.
Neutral: The seller, @Collectibleclassics, provided detailed information about the vehicle's history and current condition, ensuring transparency regarding previous minor damage, which was only a respray of a panel without significant issues. The seller also outlined the comprehensive documentation available for serious buyers, including multiple high-quality images and videos to alleviate concerns about the vehicle's condition. There were inquiries from users like @ravalencia3 and @Kosmic7 seeking clarification about specific features and discrepancies noted in previous listings, showcasing a common interest in the vehicle's background.
Negative: Some comments raised questions about the vehicle's history, specifically regarding the accuracy of the Carfax report and the condition of repairs. @ravalencia3 expressed concern over details about the exhaust system, while @Kosmic7 questioned the reasoning behind the reported damages and subsequent respray of the rear quarter panel. These concerns reflect a cautious perspective among some potential buyers, indicating they are scrutinizing the vehicle's history before considering a purchase.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The seller, @Oldisgoodtoo, shares that the 2005 Chrysler Crossfire has been a great vehicle for driving through the scenic routes of South West Virginia and also serves well for long highway trips to Florida. Notable maintenance work has been done, including the installation of new brake rotors, spark plugs, and a rebuilt Relay Control Module, ensuring the vehicle is in good condition. The seller emphasizes that 'everything works' and has taken great care in maintaining the vehicle, highlighting the quality of its performance and the joy it brings to a driving enthusiast. A detailed service record accompanies the vehicle, demonstrating a commitment to upkeep.
Neutral: There are some inquiries regarding cosmetic issues, such as the windshield trim and the appearance of the back bumper. Commenter @Beachbum86 notes that the valve cover resealing may not address underlying gasket issues, while @Grapehound questions the red tape or paint on the bumpers. @Idavidsheldon has concerns about previous damages and wear on the car, reflecting a desire for clarity on condition. @Lenny986 expresses interest in the working spoiler and appreciates the overall clean look of the car, which reflects a common sentiment among potential buyers about the vehicle's aesthetic appeal.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, several comments indicate concerns regarding the condition of the Crosfire. Commenters like @Idavidsheldon raised questions about possible prior damage and wear on various parts of the vehicle, while @Beachbum86 pointed out potential oil seepage issues as well as peeling on the windshield trim. The mixed signals about the vehicle’s condition and possible hidden damages suggest that while it may serve well as a roadster, there are areas that need attention, particularly concerning cosmetic maintenance and potential leaks.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CRUSH remarked on the vehicle's low mileage, calling it a nice 100, while @4RunTiger complimented the build quality and aesthetics, highlighting its tasteful and gorgeous appearance. @Trout2018 (The Seller) provided insights about another vehicle in the background, expressing appreciation for the comments. @TokioTX also praised the vehicle's looks and requested details about the aftermarket headlight assemblies, which @Trout2018 confirmed were inexpensive off-brand cube lights.
Neutral: @Trout2018 (The Seller) shared that the vehicle has been mostly used on pavement and provided details about its history, indicating it lived in Washington state for a year. @Sandbagger72 expressed interest in inspecting the vehicle in Dallas, to which @Trout2018 confirmed an arrangement could be made. @OzarkBadger and @Crosscreek posed additional questions regarding wiring and the vehicle's maintenance history, and @ContSp68 sought clarification about a wet spot observed in the pictures.
Negative: @nordland_61 pointed out a discrepancy regarding the wheel size, mentioning they are 18's instead of the listed 17's. @jefferson790 raised concerns regarding the vehicle's off-road history, while @ContSp68 pressed for answers about the cause of a wet spot in the photos. @steeezy2110 expressed regret over not being able to purchase the vehicle since they had just bought another SUV, signaling some disappointment in the opportunity.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the rarity and desirability of the yellow 1990 ZR1, with @provette32 noting its unique status in the market. @LotusV8 appreciates the vehicle's durability and likens the LT-5 engine to an "anvil," indicating it can serve well as a daily driver. Both @6Firebird7 (The Seller) and others like @juicyyoussy discuss the car's appeal and the positive attention it garners on the road, emphasizing its enjoyable driving experience.
Neutral: Some comments seek clarification on various specifics regarding the vehicle. @00SolarTJ1 inquires about the term "corrected notation" on the title, and @ZR-1 asks whether the car has been repainted or if solid tops are available. @Osobig raises questions concerning the windshield and driver-side mirror, while @RacingJunkie requests photos of the SPID label to better understand the car's specifications. The seller, @6Firebird7, responds to several inquiries and clarifies details about the car's past ownership, maintenance, and repairs, providing a better context for prospective buyers.
Negative: Concerns about the car's authenticity and condition arise in multiple comments. @RacingJunkie expresses skepticism about various aspects of the vehicle, noting discrepancies in the emblems and parts that suggest it may not be in original condition. @Osobig highlights potential irregularities with the windshield and questions about the car's history, suggesting it might have been misrepresented as an original color and style. Additionally, @mrred7 points out visible inconsistencies in the paint on the door latch, casting further doubt on the vehicle's overall condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed appreciation for the quality of the vehicle, with @BSD123 giving a high rating and complimenting the beauty of the car. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, also highlighted their commitment to customer satisfaction through their smooth transaction processes and high customer ratings, emphasizing their transparency about any known issues with the vehicle.
Neutral: Inquiries about the vehicle were made, particularly by @SSG556, who asked for information regarding the condition of the door panels. The seller responded promptly, ensuring that @SSG556 received the requested pictures and confirmed that there was no separation of the leather from the panels, which indicates a proactive customer service approach.
Negative: While there were no overt negative comments about the vehicle itself, the need for additional information and images about specific aspects like the door panels suggests a level of concern for potential imperfections. This indicates that some potential buyers are cautious and seeking reassurance about the vehicle's condition before making a decision.
Single-Family-Owned 2004 Toyota Tacoma SR5 Xtracab 4×4 V6
5TEWN72N84Z320864
Lot 192377
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters praised the Tacoma for its well-maintained condition, highlighting that it was owned by a non-smoker and used primarily for transportation rather than heavy-duty work. @cincycaddy noted the vehicle has been honestly presented, expressing confidence in the longevity of the Tacoma with proper maintenance. @CRUSH and others acknowledged its appearance as suitable for Northeast weather, signaling appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic and functional aspects.
Neutral: The seller, @Smokey79, provided details about the vehicle's history, explaining it was bought new by his father-in-law and maintained well over the years. This included transparency about some imperfections, such as the rust in the bed caused by a towel left under the cargo mat, which was addressed without hesitation. Additionally, comments regarding the timing belt replacement and frame assembly replacement due to a recall indicated that prospective buyers have questions that the seller is eager to answer, demonstrating an open dialogue about the vehicle's maintenance history.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, there were concerns raised about the timing belt replacement, with @MrClamdip questioning whether it had been done appropriately considering the vehicle's age. Other potential issues were also hinted at, such as the rust situation in the bed, which may worry some buyers. Additionally, there were inquiries regarding the reasons behind the frame assembly replacement, raising questions about the vehicle's overall integrity, which the seller addressed but may leave some potential buyers with lingering concerns.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors praised the 2008 Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster for its striking design and luxurious features. @Speedraser highlighted the car's underrated value, emphasizing its superb craftsmanship, analog driving feel, and reliability. @hefty_smurf expressed a newfound appreciation for roadsters, specifically admiring the color combination of the vehicle, which elevates its exotic feel. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, reiterated the car's impeccable condition, detailing extensive maintenance performed and the preservation of original parts, which showcases its exceptional care over the years.
Neutral: Some commenters expressed a neutral stance regarding the car's market performance and potential bidding outcome. @no.radar mentioned their uncertainty about the auction's success, indicating a waiting game in the current market context. @Indyheel looked forward to seeing where the bidding ends, noting the vehicle's attractive condition while acknowledging market preferences towards newer models. @CEC suggested that the seller's strategy of providing video walkarounds could enhance buyer perception and potentially increase the car's sale price.
Negative: There were concerns about market perceptions and potential buyer hesitations primarily raised by @vinnypipes, who pointed out that potential owners often fear maintenance costs associated with the vehicle. This apprehension may deter buyers from considering such luxury cars. The conversation suggested that while the seller's commitment to transparency and quality is commendable, these external market factors initially influence how these vehicles are perceived, particularly among those unfamiliar with Aston Martin's merits.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @littlehandegan (The Seller) highlights the Mercedes S450 as a whisper-quiet, smooth, safe, and reliable option, noting it's just been serviced with new Continental tires. He emphasizes the 450 engine as the most reliable choice in the S class lineup, stating it's the last reliable version made, making it ideal for those seeking a comfortable and cost-effective daily driver. The car boasts impressive power and torque figures, as well as advanced features, making it a strong contender in its class, especially with its significant upgrades in tech and aesthetics since the prior models.
Neutral: Several inquiries have come from potential buyers, such as @Bumpy requesting the window sticker, which @littlehandegan confirmed is not available. There was also a question from @Archie0731 regarding a sticker from a collision center, to which @littlehandegan responded by reassuring that the car has a clean Carfax history and provided details about some refinishing work. @littlehandegan has actively engaged with inquiries, offering additional information, video tours, and encouragement for inspections or discussions over the phone.
Negative: Some concerns were raised during the auction process, particularly from @Archie0731 questioning the vehicle's history and damage due to the collision center sticker. Although @littlehandegan addressed these concerns by clarifying the clean Carfax report and previous refinishing work, the mention of potential red flags could deter some buyers. Additionally, @Boatymcboatface humorously proposed a trade which indicates some willingness for negotiation but may also hint at skepticism about the vehicle's value compared to other options.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Lunsey remarked on the car's beauty and factory fresh repaint, particularly appreciating the exhaust note and the front license plate delete. @DeaconBlues referred to it as 'Peak E34,' emphasizing its iconic status. @Carnostic commended the tasteful modifications, such as the yellow headlights and the aggressive yet elegant stance. @Autox124 (The Seller) described their experience owning the vehicle and reiterated its status as an ultimate driving machine that has brought them joy, expressing hope for its future caretaker. @bimmere39m5 shared a positive reflection from their own experience, highlighting the E34 540i/6 as the best car they have owned and mentioning some of its reputed durability depending on the engine block characteristics. Overall, the comments convey deep admiration and appreciation for the vehicle's design and driving experience.
Neutral: Several users inquired about the car's maintenance history and reliability. @willseph posed questions regarding highway RPMs, while @cantaf asked if it could serve as a reliable daily driver, which @Autox124 confirmed it could. @Gogo84 mentioned their ownership of an identical car in gray, indicating a broader interest in the vehicle's popularity. Users like @Buett and @Kristo94 requested details on the vehicle's maintenance records, clutch performance, and any known issues, showing a desire for comprehensive information before potential bidding. The dialogue showcases genuine interest but lacks emotional weight.
Negative: Concerns were shared regarding potential issues with the vehicle's maintenance, especially from @bimmere39m5 and @Kristo94, who wanted to know about the power steering lines, gaskets, and any leaks. @E_F_III pointed out specific interior flaws such as cracks in wood trim and sagging headliner, which could be potential deterrents for bidders. Although the information provided by @Autox124 (The Seller) suggested a well-maintained vehicle, the emphasis on certain needed repairs raised questions about the condition, leaving some potential buyers wary. Additionally, there was mention of earlier struggles with emissions, adding to possible apprehension about the car's history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle's design and aesthetic, highlighting features such as the beautiful Red Mist Metallic color and the high-quality interior trim. @c5racer and @1click2many both expressed admiration for the car's styling and performance, with @1click2many noting that it combines Lamborghini styling with Porsche performance at an accessible price point. Furthermore, @Boovett found the specification of the car attractive, indicating that they would consider bidding on it if they did not already own one. @billeeG emphasized their enthusiasm for the model as a repeat buyer, reflecting a generally positive sentiment about the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: Some comments revolved around inquiries and clarifications regarding the vehicle's specifications and service history. @Al_Swearengen and @jboogie1 asked questions about the tire tread depth and the transmission service history, showing a cautious interest in understanding the car's condition. @ksmall (The Seller) addressed these queries thoroughly, confirming that no transmission replacement occurred but rather routine servicing was done, which helped solidify buyer confidence. Additionally, discussions about the C8's design changes, such as the button wall, were also present, with @PoweredbyFord noting that these cars may develop their own collectibility in the future.
Negative: On the downside, concerns were raised about minor cosmetic imperfections such as stone chips on the front of the vehicle. While @ksmall (The Seller) acknowledged these chips, they described them as small and superficial, stating that they are not easily noticeable unless inspected closely. However, the mention of these flaws, even if mitigated by @ksmall's clarifications, may still lead to apprehension for potential buyers who are sensitive to the car's pristine condition. Additionally, questions about the transmission's reliability persisted among users like @CRTurpin and @ezxh2, indicating that some potential buyers might still harbor doubts despite the reassurances provided.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @39mercman expresses enthusiasm for the Mercury, noting its nice custom build and appealing appearance, particularly praising the white upholstery. @Hangar10 shares fond memories of a similar vehicle, highlighting the car's driveable nature and wishing for it to find a good home. @Pmwoff simply expresses appreciation with a comment of 'Nice! GLWTA!'. @DRIVINGIMAGEIMPORTSLLC, the seller, provides detailed information about the vehicle, including its features and past history, indicating that it starts well, runs great, and has had care applied to its condition.
Neutral: @DRIVINGIMAGEIMPORTSLLC (The Seller) notes that the car has some cosmetic imperfections like chips and scratches and mentions a small repair on the convertible top. They assure potential buyers that there is a reasonable reserve price and offer to provide further information through videos of the car and its features. The seller expresses excitement about sharing the vehicle's history and invites the community to contribute any additional information they might have.
Negative: There are no significant negative comments about the vehicle; most feedback is positive or neutral in nature with no specific criticisms highlighted in the discussion.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many users expressed a strong appreciation for the Opel GT, highlighting its classic design and nostalgic value. @Nician shared fond memories of an Opel GT owned by a neighbor, describing it as 'very cool'. @10tenths compared it to a small Corvette, emphasizing the impressive visual appeal and sporty look. @rexracer2025 remarked on the car's unique styling, finding it a perfect intersection between other iconic vehicles. The seller, @Merlin1987, noted that the Opel GT has a loyal following and great availability of parts, making it an appealing choice for vintage car enthusiasts. Furthermore, @HlBlanton praised the speedometer's extreme optimism, adding to the overall excitement surrounding the car.
Neutral: Several comments raised questions about specific aspects and features of the vehicle. @sturdius inquired about the condition of the seats and seatbelts, while also commenting on the quality of the pictures provided in the listing. @scheissbat asked about the vehicle's original color, and @houdel provided historical context related to the Opel's design lineage with the Corvette. @Cat-U-Dog mentioned that there is a wealth of support available for Opel GT owners, including parts supply and community forums, which may be beneficial for prospective buyers. @Merlin1987, the seller, responded to many of these inquiries with detailed information about the car, including specifics about maintenance and offers of additional parts.
Negative: Some comments reflected a more critical view of the car's presentation and the seller's photography skills. @sturdius highlighted that the quality of the images included in the listing was lacking, mentioning the presence of the seller's fingers in the shots. Additionally, @Busterdog60 humorously compared the seller's photography skills to those of a dog without opposable thumbs, suggesting that there was room for improvement. Moreover, @Sparrownaut pointed out a humorously exaggerated issue regarding the car's paint, while @richard17 referenced the seller's situation in a way that may have been somewhat insensitive, suggesting some discordance in the comment section.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle, noting its quality and appeal. @sean65 highlighted the rarity of the low-mileage Brougham, suggesting it would sell for a high price. @MorganWorth (The Seller) shared enthusiasm about offering this one-owner Fleetwood, emphasizing its well-maintained condition and the original owner's care. @michaelmotorcar and @stugottz also praised the car, with @michaelmotorcar noting its desirability and potential for a great resale value.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle's condition included requests for further details and reassurance from the seller. @kink56 raised valid concerns about the brittleness of certain plastics and potential issues with the CD player and seat, to which @MorganWorth (The Seller) responded that repairs and additional photos were forthcoming. @craven appreciated the traditional comfort of the car, while @mmarinov provided personal experience with the model, mentioning common fitment issues without being overly critical.
Negative: Critiques were addressed towards certain aspects of the vehicle's mechanical condition and design. @kink56 pointed out potential issues with plastic components, suggesting that the car should ideally have been serviced before going up for auction, indicating a belief that the vehicle's presentation could be enhanced. @mcelhinney69 raised concerns about the wobbly speedometer, signaling that there might be underlying mechanical issues. @AZkid insisted that the car needed better tires, showcasing a desire for improvements before purchase.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, noting its beauty and uniqueness. @KYOB expressed a desire to display it in their living room, while @KustomKulture complimented the bike as a wonderful example of AMF Harley and Aermacchi's design collaboration. Others, like @PhilO, chimed in with excitement about the bike’s mechanical history and design, indicating strong interest in its provenance and aesthetic qualities. @39mercman also highlighted the bike's appearance, although with a suggestion to maintain the chain's condition, showcasing both admiration and practical advice.
Neutral: Comments reflected a mixture of inquiries and informative exchanges about the motorcycle, particularly from potential bidders. @Fishcars58 asked whether the bike was a survivor or restored, seeking details on its originality and shipping options. @Ballabo inquired about the motor's condition post-rebuild and the availability of an owner's manual, demonstrating interest while also looking for specific details. @Premierautofl (The Seller) actively responded to these questions, providing clarity about the bike’s restoration and shipping possibilities, which kept the conversation constructive and informative.
Negative: Some comments raised skepticism about the auction dynamics, with @bmasho suggesting an increase in new bidders participating in no-reserve auctions, hinting at potential concerns regarding the auction's integrity. Additionally, @Blizzard340 and @Slinkert discussed engine comparisons, with only slightly competitive remarks that could be seen as challenging the bike's performance credibility. However, there was no strong negativity directed toward the vehicle itself; rather, it seemed to stem from broader auction behaviors and industry observations.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed a fond appreciation for the vehicle, with @R66Ilovecars noting its unique presence alongside classic cars like the Citroen SM and RR Silver Cloud, indicating its status among notable vehicles. @schmock88 shared a positive sentiment about the car's appeal, while @Petersen6060 (The Seller) provided clarifications that showcased the vehicle’s details, contributing to the positive engagement with potential buyers.
Neutral: @redcloud1728 brought up the technical aspects of the car, specifically the down draughted cylinder head which improved engine performance, hinting at its historical significance in automotive engineering. @threeducs3 raised questions regarding the features of the car, such as the inclusion of LED headlights and the specifics of the gauges, which showed a curiosity about modern modifications and usability of the vintage design. Similarly, @TVOHIO inquired about the adjustability of the seat and pedals, indicating practical concerns that are important to potential users.
Negative: While there were no overtly negative comments, some respondents raised questions that could imply concerns. @threeducs3 questioned the functionality of the two tachometers, suggesting possible confusion or dissatisfaction with the car's instrumentation. The mention of only a 'Bill of Sale' by @schmock88 could reflect worries about the vehicle's documentation or legitimacy, which may deter some buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @aegmotorsports (The Seller) has received praise from @Rustyb, who mentioned enjoying their own 2010 Mercedes Benz GLK350, similar in year and color, and congratulated the seller on providing a clear and detailed presentation of the vehicle, particularly noting the excellent condition of the front seats. The seller affirmed that the GLK350 in the auction is well-kept, with side bolsters appearing almost as new, indicating the overall quality of the car being sold.
Neutral: The seller, @aegmotorsports, provided a thorough overview of the vehicle features and specifications, including details about the Sport Appearance Package, Premium Package, all available accessories, and specifications of the engine and drivetrain. They also mentioned the terms of the auction, including shipping options and how to contact them with questions, suggesting a transparent and professional selling process.
Negative: However, some concerns were raised by commenters such as @Hotinthesun, who shared a negative experience with a previous purchase from the seller, detailing extensive repairs they had to undertake. @IOH inquired about any odors in the vehicle, and @aegmotorsports assured that it is a non-smoker vehicle with no odors, although previous comments cast a shadow on the vehicle's reliability. Overall, while the seller aims for transparency, past customer experiences may influence potential buyers' perceptions.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @nbibeau commented on the beautiful specifications and amazing mileage of the 2008 BMW 328i, sharing their joy of driving similar cars. They remarked on the near-perfect weight distribution and reliability of the inline-six engine, indicating confidence that this vehicle would do well. @JGraham highlighted the extremely low mileage of the e90, noting its contemporary look for a 17-year-old car, while mentioning the bonus of having a six-speed manual transmission. @DJL526Blue emphasized the enjoyable driving experience associated with the straight six engine, sharing positive personal experiences with their own BMWs, and expressing confidence in the vehicle's build quality.
Neutral: @SLC57 (The Seller) actively engaged with commenters, providing information about the vehicle's maintenance history and confirming that it is registered in California. They offered insights into the engine type, clarifying for @111r that the vehicle features the N52 engine, and responded to questions from @bdadokay regarding the mileage and the condition of the key fob. @Division399 asked specific questions about the audio system, cruise control, and potential discoloration in the vehicle, prompting the seller to promise further pictures and provide explanations.
Negative: Negative comments mostly revolved around concerns about the vehicle's condition. @bdadokay raised queries regarding the verification of the low mileage and the key fob's wear, indicating possible doubts about the car's history. @Zjs noted visible scraping on the front lip and asked for photos to confirm this concern. Additionally, @Division399 expressed worries about potential smoker ownership and asked for clearer pictures of stains on the driver's seat bolster, reflecting some skepticism about the car's overall condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @West_Garrison (The Seller) expressed a genuine enthusiasm for the Suburban, highlighting its condition and rarity. @joelginaldi praised the truck's aesthetics, sharing a personal connection through his own similar vehicle. Other commenters like @PreWarM70 and @West_Garrison also recognized the vehicle's appeal and good luck messages for the auction reflected a positive atmosphere around the listing.
Neutral: Questions about the vehicle's features were raised, as seen when @ZeeTR inquired about a console issue, and @atxandy requested the RPO codes from the glove box. @MBerry sought details on test drives and inspections, while @Zacrudock questioned the vehicle's road trip readiness. These inquiries indicate a focus on specific information rather than strong opinions about the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns were voiced about potential errors in bid entries, notably by @Dollycat3 questioning a $66,000 bid, which was deemed excessively high by others. @2327bear mentioned inaccuracies relating to the truck's classification, indicating some confusion about its specifications. Furthermore, the queries regarding the console and the overall readiness for long trips suggest apprehension among potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @billyblyth fondly recalls their experience with a '69 model, highlighting its fun nature as a guilt-free entry-level British sports car. @Oldhockyplayr shares a similar nostalgia from their time with a '74 Spitfire, praising its enjoyable drive and ease of maintenance, noting that the current model looks like a solid choice for summer enjoyment. @Thirty-three-and-a-third also reminisces about their past ownership of a '72, expressing how great and fun the car is, even emphasizing the joy of driving it.
Neutral: @JosephAuto questions why the engine, which appears well-cared-for, needs rebuilding, while @graymedia compliments the addition of goggles as a nice touch. @dmmjr65 raises concerns about the source of the oil leak but is unsure, contemplating potential leaking from various engine components. @Pav1010 asks about the condition of the floor pans but struggles to assess them through the provided pictures. @chmiel (The Seller) addresses several inquiries, confirming the engine runs well and clarifying the oil leak originates from the pan, also noting that the floor pans were reinforced with MIG welding about ten years ago.
Negative: @Dake expresses skepticism regarding the oil leak's significance, suggesting that it isn't alarming until all leaks stop. @dankathrine raises a serious concern, stating they cannot consider bidding without a VIN plate for registration purposes, deeming the car as merely parts on wheels in its absence. Additionally, @LanceSC281 questions the paint job, implying it might be amateurish. Overall, while there are enthusiastic remarks about the car's fun aspect, there are definite concerns about maintenance and legal aspects.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's unique characteristics and history. @cwsteel highlighted the truck as a quintessential 'barn find', which many enthusiasts appreciate. @David_P and @CaddyNelson shared curiosity about the truck's long period of inactivity and its backstory, indicating a genuine interest in the narrative tied to the vehicle. @mein_auto described it as the most beautiful dump truck they had ever seen, while @dave6691 expressed outright love for the truck, showing a strong emotional connection to its aesthetic and potential.
Neutral: A few comments centered around the vehicle's specifics and history, with @Avalon305 querying the low mileage and the type of transmission installed. @Oldtrucksandcars brought up concerns about the maintenance status of the truck since it came out of storage. The seller, @Bugulup, addressed these inquiries by confirming that all fluids had been replaced and new tires installed, alleviating some concerns that potential buyers might have.
Negative: While the overall perception was positive, some commenters shared their challenges with wanting the vehicle despite having no real need for it or no space to store it. @NineNinetyThree993 noted their lack of storage but still felt an urge to purchase it. Other comments, such as @specialK1956 mentioning the selling price already surpassing the original sticker price, hinted at concerns about investment value rather than personal utility. This reflects a conflict between the desirability of the truck as a collector's item versus practical ownership worries.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @billpayne expressed appreciation for the vehicle, noting that it 'grows on me' and seems to promise a good ride. @henryhunt congratulated the seller on the polished surfaces of the bike, complimenting the effort involved in its restoration. Enthusiasm for the bike's build was echoed by @originalbob, who described it as a 'cool build' and acknowledged the effort put into modifications, recognizing it as a standout creation that draws admiration at events. The seller, @Morley1, confirmed that the bike has been well maintained and is a great performer, further enhancing its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Commenters had questions and expressed curiosity about the bike's history and modifications. @ApriliaBob inquired about the bike's crash history and import duties, while @toomany sought reassurance regarding a prior repair on the transmission case. @Nickers raised concerns about a visible weld repair, questioning its implications on the bike’s integrity. @Morley1 responded thoroughly to these inquiries, providing transparency about the bike's history and repairs, which suggests a commitment to clarity in the selling process. This exchange of information could be helpful for potential buyers assessing the bike's value.
Negative: However, some comments contained skepticism regarding the bike's condition. @Nickers highlighted that stress cracks are indicative of potential underlying issues, which raised doubts about the integrity of the repair. He suggested that a thorough inspection might be necessary due to the history of damage, stressing that it could affect the bike's collectible status. @Morley1 defended the bike's condition by citing the assessments made by mechanics and previous owners, but acknowledged that doubts raised might affect bidding, hinting at the challenges of addressing potential buyer concerns about the bike's history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's stunning aesthetics and condition. @GDogg highlighted the car's 'Gorgeous Gentian Blue' color, potentially making it a favorite. @Carbine123 also described it as a 'Lovely Example' with a great color combination. Additionally, @boaboyoz referred to the car as a 'rockstar,' emphasizing its appealing build and attractive finish. The seller, @supercharge57, agreed with these sentiments and expressed gratitude for the compliments.
Neutral: Several commenters posed questions about specific features and care of the vehicle. @Lanimal83 inquired about potential paint protection film (PPF) and any existing chips. @MyBidNow asked if the car had been driven in snow, reflecting cautious interest. The seller responded with detailed information about the car's care, confirming it had never been driven in snow and mentioning factory-installed PPF, which sparked differing opinions from other users.
Negative: Some concerns about the vehicle's condition were raised by various commenters. @c4ss questioned the discrepancy regarding the wheel specifications, while @911formenow pointed out visible road rash and a potential issue with the paint above the 'shark fin.' @Best_Of_Show also expressed worries about possible chips in the paint and requested paint meter readings to ensure there was no prior bodywork. The seller, @supercharge57, assured everyone that the vehicle was in pristine condition and had never undergone any repairs, addressing these concerns directly.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the car, highlighting its status as a 'SuperCar at bargain prices' and emphasizing its bridge between exotic and daily driving. @IvantS8 commended the vehicle's previous ownership, suggesting that it was well-maintained by someone who appreciated it. The paint color also received praise, described as fantastic by @MTH. Additionally, @asccfl (The Seller) emphasized using OEM parts, which resonated positively with potential buyers who value authenticity and quality.
Neutral: The inquiries made by @spinfree regarding the aftermarket exhaust system sparked informative responses from @asccfl (The Seller). The seller clarified that the exhaust is a valveless system with no adjustments, retaining the original functionality of the factory setup if needed. Detailed explanations about the carbon fiber engine cover and other OEM parts were provided, ensuring transparency about the vehicle's modifications. The seller also reassured potential buyers that the vehicle would likely pass smog regulations in California, given its configuration and lack of issues.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments regarding the vehicle; however, @spinfree’s concerns about noise levels in quiet neighborhoods suggest potential apprehension about the exhaust system's sound. The seller's clarification that the exhaust is not overly loud and does not cause drone aimed to alleviate these concerns, but some buyers might still worry about the implications of a valveless system for their driving environment.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement over the vehicle's rarity and significance, with @KWF89 highlighting it as BaT's first E46 M3 CSL. Enthusiastic reactions also came from @bmwm3tz and @Dgroos2084, who appreciated the opportunity to see such a unique car being driven rather than kept in pristine condition. Comments like those from @EMAXX and @Rix reflected a sense of anticipation for this special auction, noting how it has long been awaited, and the rarity of the model adds to its allure.
Neutral: Some participants discussed practical aspects of owning the car in the US, such as the potential issues with right-hand drive (mentioned by @otoupalik and @TBF3), and how regulations like the show & display amendment could facilitate bringing it to America (@SometimesJDM). Additionally, questions arose about the vehicle's mileage, servicing history, and any modifications it may have undergone (@BimmerWagon), demonstrating interest beyond just fandom to practical ownership considerations.
Negative: There were also criticisms regarding the auction and the car's current condition. @mad_max99 expressed doubts about the audience's appreciation and suggested the vehicle might have fared better on another platform. Concerns about modifications affecting desirability were raised by @Rix, who felt that significant money might only be spent on a completely unmodified version of the car. @BimmerWagon's comments on the limited mileage in recent years and lack of service history raised red flags for some, suggesting the car might not be as well-maintained as hoped.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is being presented as a rare 50th anniversary COPO Camaro and the seller, @sweetcars, expresses excitement about offering such a unique model. The car has a clean condition and has been well cared for despite having seen some track time, which adds to its appeal. Commenters like @Mike_Breinin appreciate the fact that this one has been raced rather than just bought as an investment, highlighting the fun and enjoyment associated with the car. The seller has provided videos that showcase the car's performance on the track, answering questions about its capability and even sharing time slips that demonstrate its impressive consistency in runs between 8.3-8.6 seconds.
Neutral: Throughout the comments, there are inquiries regarding the car's specifications and history. @rjthompson6358 asks for copies of invoices related to engine and transmission work, while @philthyphill and @shoggy1970 request information about any time slips or 1/4 mile stats. The seller is open to answering these queries, indicating that they are attempting to gather further information, including whether the car can pull its front end off the ground. Additionally, @ITTIMEFORBED expresses interest in watching a POV driving video, to which the seller responds with links to existing videos, noting some difficulties with loading on their end.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism or highlight issues; for example, @rjthompson6358's request for documentation shows a desire for more transparency. @Tobyallen's comment "Just plain NASTY. Love this" implies a disapproval of something about the vehicle, perhaps related to its history or condition. Moreover, @shoggy1970's probing questions about the 1/4 mile stats and the car’s performance suggest that potential buyers might be concerned about its racing capability. @Vtec4ever questions if it is a factory-built GM car, indicating a want for assurance regarding the vehicle's authenticity.
28k-Mile 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK63 AMG Black Series 6-Speed Conversion
WDBTJ77HX8F247614
Lot 192688
Dealer
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @OTSandCo (The Seller) expressed gratitude for interest in the Black Series, stating that despite the limitations of automatic transmissions, the car combines exceptional components like upgraded body shells, suspension, and brakes to create a focused driving experience akin to a GT3. The manual swap, which replaced the automatic, has transformed the primary complaint about the vehicle into a highlight, with many comments praising the smooth and responsive nature of the manual transmission and immediate throttle response of the M156 engine. Enthusiasts like @jman8 and @39NAS-T noted the joy of driving and the special connection that a manual gearbox provides, elevating the car's appeal.
Neutral: Multiple users raised questions about various aspects of the car and its modifications, with @racingstripes650 asking for a driving video and @stefoiust discussing previous ownership details. Comments also pointed out the importance of transparency regarding the manual swap, with some users suggesting that keeping information secret could deter potential buyers, as noted by @otoupalik. @Timbz brought up the potential impact these conversions might have on the CLK63 BS market, emphasizing the growing interest in manual swaps in this segment of performance vehicles.
Negative: Concerns were expressed regarding the disabled ESP (Electronic Stability Program) after the manual transmission swap, with @sockpuppet clarifying the absence of the system and other users questioning the implications of this change for handling stability and future serviceability. @jkershaw356 raised worries about maintenance challenges related to the custom clutch post-swap, while @otoupalik and others stressed the necessity for greater transparency about the parts and construction of the transmission system. The overall sentiment highlighted the unease about potential complications that may arise from expensive modifications which could limit the car's resale value and accessibility for future repairs.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments reflect positively on the vehicle, particularly appreciating its appearance and modifications. @LongiMotorsports remarked that a similar car, a 2000 version, was the best, suggesting high regard for the model. @MMMMM noted the potential investment value of the vehicle, stating that it could be a better investment than stock markets. @Porschephilia, emphasizing the car's beautiful design, highlighted the importance of the euro center console armrest and the BlueBus, indicating that it has features appreciated by enthusiasts.
Neutral: The seller, @Sdotmerc, provided extensive background information about the car's condition and history. They mentioned that the car had been garage kept and fully serviced, stating they had always taken care not to use it for short trips. The seller addressed a previous accident noted on the Carfax report, explaining that the damage occurred well before their ownership and has since been repaired to a high standard. The conversation included various details about maintenance, modifications, and other aspects such as the presence of original parts, and they encouraged potential buyers to reach out for more information or viewings.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's history and modifications. @Joe-BMW brought up the aesthetic of the wheels when they were initially acquired, saying they were "black hideous wheels" and emphasized the difficulty of finding proper staggered wheels. Additionally, @Gteapen questioned possible wear on the paint visible in certain photos, while @tilt100 questioned the effectiveness of the performance modifications compared to stock options. Overall, while enthusiasm was evident, these comments highlighted a cautious perspective on certain visual and performance aspects.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @OCKurt praised the vehicle for being durable enough to survive a zombie apocalypse, suggesting its reliability and toughness. @MarcGyver referred to the truck as great and deserving of a museum, highlighting its exceptional condition and collectible status. Other commentors, including @Mongoose55 and @aof, echoed sentiments about the vehicle's superior performance, with aof suggesting it could outlast multiple Chevy and Ford trucks. @pattonjim48 shared insights into the truck's history and restoration, emphasizing its pristine condition and low mileage, reinforcing the appreciation for its rarity and quality.
Neutral: @Mr.Majestyk and @Tonysrx7 sought clarification about the truck's specifications, such as bed length and speaker placement, showing interest in its features without making a definitive judgment. @BlitzLead mentioned that the low miles at auction would ultimately have an impact, but their comment was neutral about the truck's overall condition. @zando provided historical context regarding Toyota trucks, recognizing the model's intended design despite concerns over the bulbous redesign for North America, indicating moderate interest in its legacy.
Negative: @masterwayne raised concerns about rust on the truck, asking about its progression since the last sale and the type of maintenance performed during the low usage period, thus questioning the seller's transparency. @Tonysrx7 also commented on the potential implications of the vehicle's history and ownership, expressing skepticism about its maintenance routine over the years. Overall, the neutrality in some comments contrasts sharply with concerns regarding the truck's condition, showcasing a range of opinions on its integrity.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Hackberry finds it cool to see a survivor and describes it as beautiful. @mark_99 calls the vehicle pure and suggests that restoring only what is necessary would be ideal, appreciating the solid floorpan and great presentation. @Jerbo expresses love for the flathead engine, calling it a great survivor car, while @Ypss36 describes it as an interesting and honest survivor that embodies comfort and reliability. Additional positive mention comes from @Robin, who describes the vehicle as charming and suggests simple seat covers for preservation.
Neutral: @kginsberg (The Seller) agrees with @mark_99 about the vehicle being pure and shares that it will come with an extra set of 5 wheels. @MrESL inquires about title corrections and receives clarification from @kginsberg (The Seller) that the VIN was corrected due to a minor error. @melan expresses curiosity about whether this specific year and model originally included turn signals and juice brakes, while @fleetfuel challenges the claim of hydraulic brakes, discussing their introduction dates in the context of the car's features.
Negative: @MrESL questions whether the title correction was substantial or minor, indicating a concern about the vehicle's provenance. @fleetfuel disputes the hydraulic brakes claim, raising doubts about the accuracy of the vehicle's mechanical status. Some comments, such as those from @CarmanUSA2025, about tire conditions seem to be made in jest, hinting at a possible skepticism regarding the vehicle's readiness for road use.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Willybadger remarked that the Jeep's "USMC green" paint really stands out, adding charm to its appearance. They also noted that while the vehicle is missing a shovel and axe, these items can be easily sourced and would enhance the overall look. This appreciation for its aesthetics indicates the Jeep has desirable qualities that appeal to enthusiasts.
Neutral: @bgclarrk1 (The Seller) provided detailed information about the Jeep, mentioning that the frame number is 138642, and that the auction had been extended to accommodate their schedule. Additionally, discussions regarding the title year have revealed that while it states 1945, some experts suggest it could be from 1944, highlighting potential discrepancies in its history. The seller has made efforts to clarify these aspects, including a link to more photographs of the Jeep and associated parts for better transparency.
Negative: @Calstickshift described the Jeep's appearance as reminiscent of a prop from the set of M.A.S.H., which might imply a sense of neglect or disrepair. @D518 raised concerns about the authenticity of parts, inquiring about original combat rims and the speedometer's replacement. These inquiries highlight possible uncertainties regarding the vehicle's condition and historical accuracy, casting a shadow over its overall desirability.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @andrewthieman noted that it's a good vehicle, while @Timzak expressed enthusiasm about its great shape and attractive color combination. @MontanaBroncos praised the Bricknose's driving capability, though they preferred photos with the top on. @mountainrev also commented on the look with the top off, appreciating the custom fiberglass trim's professional finish. @jbrown89 highlighted the trim piece and complimented the vehicle overall, and @TheMDNTcollection shared that they have seen the truck in person and described it as pretty nice. @BWM24 remarked on its clean appearance and pleasing color combo.
Neutral: @dreamcrusieclassics, the seller, provided insight into the added fiberglass trim piece, mentioning it was crafted from a donor top by a friend. This seller later confirmed that the hard top looks great on the Bronco and shared that it was put on recently. The seller also addressed concerns regarding the power rear window and rear defroster, stating that both functions are operational, and clarified the situation with the hard top and its mounting hardware.
Negative: @Afav raised several concerns about the vehicle, inquiring whether the engine smokes or uses oil, if there are leaks into the interior, and asked about potential differential whines or other engine and transmission noises. They also expressed worry over the AC not functioning properly and whether the coolant temperature gauge was broken or if the thermostat requires replacement. This shows a clear need for the seller to address potential mechanical issues that may impact buyer interest.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Shelbyisthe1 shared a great experience driving a manual DB7 GT daily for four years, stating he never faced problems with the vehicle, which reflects positively on Aston Martin's reliability. @Turbowned highlighted the impressive service history of the DB9, praising its aesthetic for the mileage and potential as a great deal despite some exterior wear. Others, like @GDogg and @jrb007, echoed similar sentiments, appreciating the car's remarkable condition, performance, and documentation, indicating it as a well-maintained example of an Aston Martin.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the vehicle's overall condition and the need for certain clarifications. @thetom and @westcoastcars expressed a desire for more close-up images to assess imperfections, particularly regarding the passenger door and dash leather. @Turbowned and @FXRcR1 noted the car's features and accessories but mentioned wanting additional information, like the condition of the front main seal and the availability of the original window sticker, highlighting the need for thorough documentation for serious buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about specific flaws and the accuracy of the visual presentation. @distributorguy pointed out a lack of images showing the underside of the vehicle and questioned the presence of curb rash, while @eastportalfa and @Turbowned remarked on possible paint peeling in certain images. These comments indicate a level of skepticism regarding the condition of the car that might deter potential bidders unless more detailed evidence is provided.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @2caddiesandaMach1 finds the vehicle to be an awesome-looking mild custom and appreciates the aesthetic of the wheel choice that keeps it in the family. This sentiment is echoed by several other commenters, including @stugottz, who describes it as a 'Bad A$ Olds,' and @Red350DropTop, who praises the incredible finishing in the interior. @Dollycat3 calls it an exceptional California Oldsmobile, highlighting its stunning build and interior, while @boaboyoz and @mike_rockwell acknowledge the fantastic Royal Jade Pearl Metallic finish and the successful restoration efforts. Overall, many viewers express their admiration for the car's beauty and the quality of the work put into it.
Neutral: Commenters had various thoughts regarding certain features and specifications of the vehicle. @ShaneS makes some minor suggestions for improvements, like changing the valve covers and steering wheel, indicating that these changes are easily fixable without major modifications. @David_P mentions their personal preference regarding body style but acknowledges the car is well done. @w2p inquires about the front suspension specifics, and @TXDesFox asks about the car's readiness for a long drive and tire details, showing interest in the car's practical attributes without expressing strong opinions either way.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, a few individuals raised concerns. @Mcarver351 remarked that the oil pan might not withstand Nashville's potholes, indicating possible concerns about the car's durability. Furthermore, while @Pfeil appreciates the car's aesthetics, they suggest an engine swap to a more powerful Oldsmobile engine, hinting at dissatisfaction with the current Chevy engine. Overall, the negative comments appear minimal and largely revolve around specific features that some believe could be enhanced or modified.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Hans_GZP expresses nostalgia for the vehicle, recalling having seen it at the East Coast Gathering in 2004. @Penope (The Seller) acknowledges the inquiries and adds photos of the title and proof of the roll cage's welding to the frame, indicating some commitment to transparency in sales. @Los_19 finds the auction intriguing and wishes for good luck, which hints at an engaging atmosphere around the listing.
Neutral: There seems to be mixed information about the vehicle's condition and modifications, as @Kaeden seeks clarification on the roll cage installation and mentions it has not been on the road since 2007. @DrCrash and other commenters express limited confidence due to the lack of substantial driving videos and proper testing. The comments suggest a collective curiosity about the car's history, like @scooch27 sharing the anecdote of inheritance and failed attempts at making the car a track vehicle.
Negative: Several commenters raise concerns regarding the vehicle's state, including @bradyzq who criticizes the quality of road test videos, questioning if they provide a true representation of the car as it appears to lack substantial driving footage. @Turbonotch1990 mentions worries about the potential headache the future owner might face due to unclear communication from the seller. Overall, there is a prevailing sense of skepticism about the project car's viability, as several commenters, like @DONUT5, point out serious reservations about the roll cage and wiring work that has been done, further amplifying doubts on the reliability of the vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @balto_joe remarked on how nice the MK IIA looks, while @porkpiehat found the car very appealing. @dirtrack49 described it as a beautiful example and expressed interest in a driving video after confirming the car runs. @rlincoln appreciated the model's history and made comparisons with a Hillman convertible he owns, noting the car's improvements. @Pablok complimented the Talbot 90's paint and interior finishes and sought more information about features, showing enthusiasm for the vehicle.
Neutral: The seller @Baronautogroup provided detailed information about the car's features and answered questions from various commenters. They mentioned that photos were affected by bad weather but promised to upload more, including outdoor shots with the top down and a driving video. They cleared up inquiries regarding the tool kits' absence, the window function, and other specifications like the car's positive ground system. They remained open to questions and communicated frequently, offering updates on various aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns about missing parts, such as tool kits and door check arms. @marinlands pointed out the absence of photos showing where the tools are stored, leading to confusion about the vehicle's completeness. @Pablok raised questions regarding the door locking mechanism and potential issues with the carburetor's air filtration, indicating concerns about authenticity and functionality. Overall, there were hints of uncertainty regarding the vehicle's restoration history and related details.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is praised as a stunning low mileage S2000, with an OEM hardtop included, enhancing its appeal. @Asdspeed (The Seller) highlights it as a 'time capsule of beauty,' indicating the level of care and preservation of the vehicle. @thunderbirdsnw notes the car's status as a 'very nice example of a AP2 car,' reinforcing the positive reception of its condition and features. Many commenters express excitement about the hardtop and its aesthetic, including @Button, who appreciates how the hardtop complements the car's design.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle's maintenance and history are mixed. @Usd97 finds it fascinating that the car last passed smog in 2012, suggesting it has been minimally driven, while @usurbrain shows enthusiasm for the auction atmosphere, emphasizing a light-hearted start. Questions arise about the condition of specific areas of the vehicle, such as the soft top's appearance raised by @sudokatsu, while inquiries about the hardtop's authenticity are addressed by @andykim, who receives confirmation from @Asdspeed (The Seller).
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's history are highlighted by @TheDudeAbides2, who mentions previous accidents affecting similar models and suggests that not all potential buyers recognized the value of the current offering. The visibility of wear on components like the driver's seat leather is also discussed by @U0NLYLV4N0W, who cautions future buyers to be aware of such issues. Additionally, @Anon notes that another red S2000 fetched a lower price, sparking discussions about market trends and buyer perceptions.
20k-Mile 1988 Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe Mach 1 5-Speed
1FABP64T1JH229422
Lot 192409
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed high praise for the vehicle's appearance and condition. @Cadillac_man described it as a 'righteous ride', while @AlwaysFBody emphasized that 'Red has to be the best color on this bird'. @F117 also showed enthusiasm, noting the car's charm and congratulating @Tommy88turbo (The Seller) for the nice vehicle. Further, @Jonas9943, a known acquaintance of the owner, lauded the meticulous maintenance and near-perfect state of the Turbo Coupe, affirming that if someone desires a Thunderbird Turbo Coupe, this is the one to buy. Overall, the car was frequently praised for its standout Bright Red paint and immaculate condition, with many acknowledging the special allure of the Mach 1 edition.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on specific details about the vehicle. @topshoe inquired whether the Mach 1 was a factory or dealer option, while @Vanderhawk asked about the type of freon used in the A/C system. @Rdr76 questioned the presence of any rust, and @scottmadwi pointed out a discrepancy regarding the factory invoice, pondering the spelling 'MACK 1' versus 'Mach 1'. @Gz7 made an observation about the tailpipes, suggesting they resemble those found on Fox body Mustang LXs, prompting a response from @Tommy88turbo (The Seller) who confirmed that the exhaust system had been modified.
Negative: Despite the predominantly positive feedback, some concerns were raised about the car's condition. @Jim_Nayzium noted a damage to the pinch weld visible in one of the photos, prompting @Tommy88turbo (The Seller) to acknowledge and investigate the area further. Similarly, @whamm8 expressed skepticism regarding the Mach 1 edition features, particularly regarding the rear wing and Mach 1 stickers. @Tobyallen shared a negative personal experience with dealership service, which he compared to this car's victory in terms of condition. Nonetheless, @Tommy88turbo (The Seller) reassured commenters of the car's overall integrity and response to the critiques.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @trieste5 expresses a nostalgic appreciation for the Ducati 899 Panigale, describing it as a bike he regrets selling, emphasizing its special nature and unique body style that he believes remains unmatched by later models. Additionally, @DWahl shares that the bike has been well-maintained, having been ridden only a few times in the past 6-7 years, showing that it still runs fine and all features, including the left rear signal, function properly.
Neutral: @jmanalo inquires about maintenance specifics, particularly regarding fluids and belts, reflecting a practical angle towards the car's upkeep. Other comments, such as those from @azdriver2023, focus on technical aspects, like the date codes on the tires and the incorporation of rear turn signals into the tail light, providing valuable insights into the vehicle's condition while showing an active interest in its features.
Negative: @azdriver2023 raises concerns over the age of the tires, suggesting that they may be 12-years old, which could indicate an underlying issue regarding safety and maintenance. Similarly, when checking on the original belts and cowl for the second seat, there is a sense of disappointment when @DWahl confirms their absence, potentially raising doubts about the bike's overall completeness and condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning color combination and elegant presentation. @Dollycat3 described the SL as 'absolutely beautiful,' praising both its gorgeous interior and the seller's reputation. Commenter @stev0001, who has seen the car in person, confirmed that the photos do not do it justice, emphasizing the beauty of its color. Additionally, @Maxwell077 and @Dirtrack49 shared their appreciation for the car's design, colors, and features, with @Dirtrack49 noting the significant advantage of its four-speed transmission.
Neutral: Comments from @FantasyJunction (The Seller) provided valuable insights into the car's history and specifications. They confirmed that the 250SL is located in their showroom and offered potential buyers the opportunity to view it in person or request additional information about its restoration. @MilleMiglia raised questions regarding the car's options and factory installations, leading to clarification about its original color and features, including the dashboard finish related to the exterior body color. Other commenters, like @cleverusername, discussed the authenticity of the car, speculating on its delivery and potential repainting of certain features.
Negative: Some comments did express concerns about specific aspects of the vehicle. @Bshaunessy requested a cold start video to verify the engine's performance, indicating skepticism about the car's mechanical condition based on the initial warm startup video. Additionally, @Capitanron and @MilleMiglia engaged in a discussion about the fender notches, with differing opinions on their importance to the car's value. Overall, while the majority of comments were positive, these inquiries suggest that some potential buyers remain vigilant about the car's authenticity and condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @misterelephant wished the seller good luck with the sale, expressing hope that this transaction would go better than a previous experience. @2000RoadsterM provided additional photos of the rear of the vehicle for potential buyers to inspect the weld conditions, indicating a willingness to share information and transparency about the vehicle's status. The seller also noted the car has only been driven a limited number of times, mentioning a low mileage of 4,608 since acquisition, which might imply the vehicle is in a good condition due to less wear and tear.
Neutral: @2000RoadsterM mentioned that he is selling the car because he is retiring and has not been able to keep up with maintenance due to limited driving. He highlighted that despite the need for some maintenance items, like the air conditioning switch and the possibility of replacing the soft top's old seals, the car is otherwise functioning properly and is driven regularly. He described a minor accident involving a small animal but assured that repairs were completed professionally to restore the vehicle's condition, which could address buyers' concerns about its history.
Negative: There were some concerns raised by potential buyers like @murkt12 and @kiosko regarding the condition of the soft top and the functionality of various mechanical components, such as the door's closing mechanism and the flex disk. @kiosko specifically asked about the condition post-accident and the need for upcoming maintenance, indicating a skepticism about the vehicle's overall reliability and care. While @2000RoadsterM attempted to address these concerns, stating there were no issues with the door and explaining the vehicle's known maintenance requirements, the questions raised may still leave some potential buyers feeling uncertain.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MSCLASSICCARSLLC (The Seller) shared enthusiasm for the 1970 Simplicity Sovereign 3314H Garden Tractor, emphasizing its rarity and high-quality restoration. Commenters like @BossPapa and @racingflyboy expressed excitement over the tractor's unique design and nostalgia for similar models, pointing out the attractive color scheme and how well it runs.
Neutral: Several users noted the interesting features of the tractor and trailer. @vfn inquired about the trailer's practical use, while @Olbugger and @wrg46012 referenced its resemblance to a Gravely product. Others, like @Chargitt, raised questions about its functionality, showing an interest in its mechanics and usability for mowing and transportation.
Negative: @GlenK raised a skeptical view on the auction platform, suggesting the tractor was more of a novelty item. @rd6483 questioned whether the tractor is for practical use or just display. Additionally, @sdjohn351 made a humorous remark about the term 'Sovereign citizen,' implying a lack of seriousness in the tractor's purpose.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the unique color of the vehicle, with @timlaw expressing a fondness for Dakar Yellow, suggesting the setup with Bilstein B8s and stock springs offers a reasonably firm yet comfortable ride. @Greedypetey notes the car looks even better in person and commends the seller for their meticulous care of the vehicle. Additionally, @sl600 admires the mileage and enjoys the story behind the car's ownership, indicating a sentimental value that adds to its appeal.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the aesthetics and condition of specific parts of the vehicle. @RyanY and @s52z3mc raise questions about the repainting of certain panels and the alignment issues, implying that there may have been prior bodywork done. @The_BPlummer11 (The Seller) provides background information regarding the car's history, maintenance, and any upgrades performed by his father, which adds context to its current state. There are mixed feelings about the M badges; while @timlaw acknowledges the potential to remove them, @s52z3mc describes them as 'cringe.'
Negative: Criticism arises regarding the repainted panels as pointed out by @RyanY and @ac680, who also notes that the M badges and V12 logos are unwelcome additions to the car. @RyanY expresses concern about potential damage based on the misalignment of the bodywork. @s52z3mc mentions the rear window is an 'unobtainium' part, indicating that sourcing replacements may be difficult or costly, thus posing a significant drawback. Additionally, @bmwfxr raises logistical issues around replacing the rear glass, which could deter potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg praised the Panamera S as a very nice vehicle. @JORA_Imports (The Seller) expressed excitement about this Porsche, highlighting its desirable features and color combination. They emphasized the car's reliability, stating that they would confidently drive it across the country. The seller reassured potential buyers about the car's excellent condition, mentioning meticulous maintenance and no leaks, making it a turn-key vehicle. They also invited inspections and offered various services such as free storage and shipping assistance for the winning bidder.
Neutral: @mbamg shared their appreciation for the car's specifications, noting the rarity of its options like the PDCC, which significantly enhances handling. Another comment from @Freestyling inquired about specific components like the build sheet and tire date codes, and @zzracing raised a concern about a prior water leak issue, which @JORA_Imports addressed by detailing the car's condition regarding water intrusion after having it checked. Overall, there was a blend of enthusiasm for the car's specifications and a few requests for more detailed information from potential buyers.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns; @zzracing highlighted a CarFax entry regarding a body water leak check, questioning if it related to known issues with the roof drains. @eclectictaste inquired about potential camshaft controller issues that had previously led to recalls. @Drbipper asked about any sagging in the suspension and requested a cold start driving video, which @JORA_Imports explained may not be possible due to staffing limitations. There’s a semblance of apprehension among bidders about both the car's history and existing warranties.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the high quality and features of the 2022 Revel van. @bsinnott911 shared an extensive positive experience with a similar model, highlighting its versatility, comfort, and ability to navigate diverse terrains, which made them prefer the Revel over other travel options. They emphasized the community surrounding Revels that supports upgrades and maintenance. Additionally, @brianshack (The Seller) reassured potential buyers about the vehicle's new condition and highlighted its desirable features, such as a powerful 6-cylinder engine and a well-thought-out build with plenty of storage and amenities.
Neutral: Some commenters sought additional information about the vehicle's specifications, such as seat belts, height, length dimensions, and water storage. @vincepmayne asked about the onboard water storage and solar power capabilities, while @conniebonx requested specific height and length measurements. @KSB21 expressed interest in seeing the RV in person for a test drive and asked about the tow rating. @Davethewave inquired about the gas mileage, and @thumperracer questioned the sleeping arrangements. @Keenish even asked for service records or a pre-purchase inspection.
Negative: A few concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's history and minor flaws. @SELit questioned whether the van had any exposure to flood waters, suggesting that it had been in North Carolina during a hurricane. @brianshack (The Seller) promptly clarified that the vehicle had always been garaged and had no water storm damage. Despite the positive feedback, @brianshack also noted minor physical flaws, including small scratches on the paint and a slight chip in the windshield, which could be off-putting for some potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reveal a strong admiration for the 2009 Pontiac G8 GXP, with several commenters expressing nostalgia and fondness for the Pontiac brand. @wagz1601 states that the G8 is one of his favorite Pontiacs and questions why the brand was discontinued while others like Buick remain. @TrainReq shares that the car has been a 'pride and joy' since 2013 and highlights its well-maintained condition having been garage-kept since 2019. Additionally, @nycg8 appreciates the seller's diligence in maintaining the vehicle, noting that oil changes were consistently performed every 3-5k miles with synthetic high mileage oil, which reflects the seller's commitment to the car's care.
Neutral: Some comments discuss the vehicular details and sale process without expressing strong positive or negative sentiments. For instance, @gsdup67 inquires about the car's past usage during street takeovers, and @nfoehlinger mentions a new participant bidding on the vehicle, suggesting that the bidding dynamics may be variable. The follow-up comments between various users, including @Fiveliterbtr and @Vargasvinyls, hint at typical marketplace banter, focusing on the seller experience and typical auction behavior rather than direct comments about the car's quality or performance.
Negative: However, there are some negatives noted, particularly regarding the car's history. @TrainReq mentions the vehicle has a CarFax report indicating 'very minor damage' from hitting a pothole, which may raise some concerns for potential buyers. Additionally, @wagz1601 expresses disappointment in the discontinuation of Pontiac, reflecting a sentiment that the brand's legacy is missed, which indirectly speaks to the perceived value of the G8. This discussion hints at a sense of frustration over the vehicle's market performance and brand status post-manufacture.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a "very handsome Jimmy" and praising the build quality with remarks like "Tremendous build - GLWTA!" The seller, @Jwolfgangk, also conveyed care for the truck, sharing that they had enjoyed it and made improvements like adding a Holley Sniper EFI to enhance its performance. Furthermore, the seller noted that the vehicle drives straight and can reach speeds of 65 to 70 mph comfortably, which has garnered further interest and excitement from potential buyers.
Neutral: Comments included inquiries about specific details regarding the truck, such as aspects of its interior and previous history. For instance, @RSMITHAUTOMOTIVE asked where the truck came from and what sheet metal might have been replaced, while @Porkchopzz4 specifically inquired about the spray-painted door cards and the original color code for the vehicle. The seller provided responses to various questions and concerns, aiming to assure interested buyers about the truck's condition and history.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns or requests for clarification, with @Porkchopzz4 questioning the quality of the interior refurbishment and @Roclandbiz expressing confusion over how to communicate with the seller privately. Additionally, @1974EB asked for specifics about a noted crack on the tailgate, which prompted @Jwolfgangk to explain that it was a fiberglass stress crack, aiming to not mislead potential buyers about the truck's condition. Overall, while the vehicle has its fans, there are uncertainties regarding its wear and detailing that may raise doubts among some prospective buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @SonnyCrockett13 remarked humorously about the car, suggesting its captivating presence would be like blinking in photos. @boaboyoz praised it as a 'righteous Rosso Corsa 360 Modena' expressing a genuine enthusiasm. @Noahyjohn highlighted his admiration for the Daytona seats, calling them super cool, indicating a strong appreciation for the car's aesthetic design.
Neutral: @TY4321 (The Seller) provided detailed information on the recommended service for the vehicle, including maintenance checks and fluid changes, showing transparency in vehicle upkeep. @RfBrit10 inquired about obtaining a cold start and driving video to support potential bids, which reflects a practical interest in ensuring they have enough information. @LDV requested additional close-up and specific photos for better visual representation, indicating a need for more clarity in the advertisement.
Negative: @TN88 criticized the limited number of photographs and emphasized the necessity of proper documentation for upcoming service, exhibiting frustration over a potential lack of reliability. @MilesWhitlock shared a negative personal experience with the 2000 model's transmission issues, questioning whether the 2003 models had resolved these problems, suggesting concerns about the vehicle's mechanical reliability. @altaylar mentioned the negative sentiment of seeing the car being free revved, indicating his concern for the vehicle's care despite his overall positive acknowledgment.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dollycat3 expresses admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a beautiful Wagoneer with many appealing features. @GDogg also praises the vehicle, highlighting its attractive color combination of blue and tan, suggesting it stands out aesthetically.
Neutral: @Janopapay, the seller, provides practical information regarding shipping options for the vehicle, detailing the costs for both international transport to various European countries and domestic shipping across the United States, indicating a willingness to accommodate buyers from different locations.
Negative: @Untriedmallard's comment appears to be unclear or irrelevant to the discussion about the vehicle, possibly indicating confusion or a lack of engagement with the topic.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed strong admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive condition and aesthetic appeal. @lemondzurich simply stated, "Just WOW!" while @ryguy206 praised it as a "museum piece," showcasing its collectible quality. @BCJ8 emphasized the car's modern look compared to contemporary vehicles and remarked on its superior quality, and @carstruck noted that it is "the one Ontario car with no rust," hinting at the car's well-preserved nature. Overall, the positive comments reflect a genuine appreciation for the vehicle’s design and rarity.
Neutral: Several inquiries and comments touched on logistical aspects of the vehicle. @mezik asked if there were any fees or taxes for shipping and registering the car in the USA, indicating interest in its marketability. @EA911 raised a question about the ride height of the car, suggesting it might have been adjusted, while @Gsk.kev inquired if the car included a back seat, showing curiosity about its specifications. @Taz24 also sought clarification on the wheel setup, indicating engagement with the car's details and potentially making a purchase.
Negative: One negative commentary came from @Knuckles-R-Busted, who expressed confusion over the two-tone paint scheme historically used by Mercedes, reflecting a more critical view of the vehicle's aesthetic choices. This comment implies a preference for more straightforward design elements, which contrasts with the general praise the car received by others. While this observation wasn't heavily negative, it did inject a hint of skepticism into an otherwise positive discourse about the vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received commendations for its cosmetic condition and performance modifications. @JEFFD4271 (The Seller) highlighted that after inspecting the truck, it was better than described during the auction. The addition of a brand new Blueprint 383 engine, capable of delivering 436 horsepower, alongside a 4L80E transmission, has been noted to enhance its capacity for highway cruising. The vehicle retains its stock suspension which includes extra capacity rear springs and a towing hitch, making it an attractive option for buyers seeking reliability and performance.
Neutral: Some commenters had inquiries about specific features of the truck. @topduarte expressed interest in details regarding the transmission and whether the original components were available. @weidhopper raised questions about the condition of the truck bed, specifically a blemish seen in photos. @JEFFD4271 (The Seller) actively responded to these queries, clarifying that the bed has a minor touch-up and provided further images to illustrate its condition, while also addressing other concerns about the vehicle's air conditioning functionality through demonstration videos.
Negative: A few comments suggested potential drawbacks of the truck. @Blind remarked that they would consider bidding if the vehicle had a Bell housing cover, indicating a concern about certain specifications that might affect its desirability. Additionally, @weidhopper’s inquiry about a possible hole in the bed implied a worry about structural integrity, even though @JEFFD4271 (The Seller) assured that the bed was in excellent condition and that the observed blemish was non-structural.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Longlivethestick mentions that the vehicle has a commendable combined fuel economy rating of 27 MPG, noting that a former client achieved 36 MPG on the freeway, branding it as one of the best daily driving X5 models available. @sackboy shares a personal experience stating that after ordering the vehicle back in 2014, it has now accumulated 116k miles and remains highly favored by his wife. He even customized it with features like 'Night Vision' and a third row seating option, emphasizing the car's special qualities.
Neutral: @genevamotorcars (The Seller) provides potential buyers with a road test video, which can give them additional insights into the vehicle's performance. Additionally, @genevamotorcars engages with @trublu's inquiry about heated seats, clarifying that only the front seats are heated and directing them to the build sheet for details, despite the absence of the window sticker. This informative dialogue helps prospective buyers understand specific features of the vehicle better.
Negative: @trublu raises concerns about the vehicle's seating features, expressing disappointment that only the front seats are heated. Furthermore, they inquire about the availability of a window sticker showing all packages and options, which indicates a potential lack of clarity concerning the vehicle's complete specifications. Such questions might create hesitation among potential buyers looking for comprehensive information on the vehicle.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TheOtherPeterB expresses satisfaction with their 2008 CL600, claiming it is a luxurious daily driver that spoils the owner. They enjoy driving it despite its size, which can be cumbersome in suburban areas. Similarly, @Hargo appreciates the smoothness and quiet performance of the CL600 compared to the AMG series, finding both V12 engines a delight to own. @LordVenn finds the car gorgeous and is contemplating adding another twelve-cylinder vehicle to their collection, showing a recognition of its appeal and desirability.
Neutral: @WisdomFirst inquires about repair possibilities for loose door panels and seeks a performance comparison between the CL600 and the AMG series, demonstrating curiosity about the vehicle's maintenance and capabilities. @no.radar mentions that the seller has addressed a particular door trim issue for a fee, indicating some level of transparency in the auction process. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, provides details about their operations and commitment to clear communication, emphasizing their high customer satisfaction ratings.
Negative: Despite the positive views, there are concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, as @WisdomFirst calls for significant detailing to increase its market value. This highlights a perceived need for care that could impact buyer interest. Comments suggest a focus on potential flaws may detract from the vehicle's allure, especially when potential buyers like @WisdomFirst are keen on updates regarding repairs and maintenance.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors like @GDogg and @Samoa7 expressed admiration for the vehicle's stunning Granite Green color, highlighting its impressive durability and capability in various environments. @boaboyoz referred to the 992.1 Dakar as a fantastic build, even giving a nod to its mileage reminiscent of an iconic drum machine. Several users found the car truly one of a kind, indicating it stands out among its peers, as noted by @Espanolie and @h_bakken.
Neutral: The discussion amongst commentors included inquiries about the vehicle's unique features and options. @wdp2025 was curious about the pricing of the roof rack and accessories, while @LAFlyer speculated about the color composition of Granite Green. @gilchristm (The Seller) provided clarity regarding the color's comparison to other Porsche shades, showing a proactive approach to addressing potential buyer concerns. Additionally, queries arose about the vehicle's windshield replacements, with @HToddPorscheTS sharing personal experiences related to similar issues with the car.
Negative: On the downside, some users noted issues surrounding the vehicle's mileage, with @porsche1986 expressing concern and indicating they would refrain from bidding as a result. @flyfaster highlighted the potential cost and complications associated with rear glass replacement, hinting at repair difficulties. Moreover, @Jeborg questioned the manner in which the windshields were damaged during the rack removal, reflecting skepticism about the vehicle's condition and history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @LS787 (The Seller) describes the motorcycle as a beautiful bike that deserves a good home, highlighting its vintage design and features. He expresses pride in owning it, stating it is in excellent shape despite noting a few minor imperfections. The seller has had the motorcycle cared for by a Ducati dealer since day one and emphasizes that all cosmetic damage has been repaired using OEM parts, reinforcing the quality of the bike.
Neutral: Commenters have raised important questions about the motorcycle's condition and history, with @motoFiend advising the replacement of 12-year-old belts for safety. This reflects a common concern among potential buyers regarding the maintenance of vintage motorcycles. Additionally, @MCLeather inquires about any possible crash damage, showing interest but without a strong negative bias as he acknowledges the bike's overall appeal. @jakeisback asks for confirmation on the timing of belt replacements, indicating a search for clarity rather than a negative or critical stance.
Negative: @MCLeather expresses concern regarding potential crash damage, hinting that this could impact the bike's desirability and safety. Despite the seller's reassurance about the bike's cosmetic repairs, questions like these may raise doubts in potential buyers' minds. Furthermore, @jakeisback's inquiry about the belts not being replaced since 2013 might indicate skepticism about the seller's responsibility in maintaining the bike's crucial components, suggesting that some buyers might be hesitant without proof of comprehensive maintenance.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors like @newcarpro, @Pmwoff, and @BOWSERBOY1950 appreciate the vehicle's build and features. @Pmwoff specifically compliments the build quality and inquires about potential for vintage air and heat, while @BOWSERBOY1950 admires the classic Pontiac hotrod styling and the performance of the Powerglide transmission. @mike_rockwell also praises the vehicle's low stance and reliable drivetrain, highlighting its classic Pontiac characteristics.
Neutral: Additionally, @Dieseldog6392, the seller, responds positively to these remarks, noting that the Powerglide transmission was a good choice for the vehicle, emphasizing its ease of use. He expresses gratitude for the compliments, reinforcing the quality of the build and the choice of components used in the vehicle.
Negative: On a less favorable note, @cad58Y questions the choice of the Powerglide transmission, indicating that there might be better options available. However, @BOWSERBOY1950 counters this concern by insisting that the hotrod deserves more bids, suggesting that the overall interest in the vehicle is strong despite any reservations.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg describes the GT2RS as absolutely stunning and menacing in a good way, while @Espanolie praises it as an amazing build from the factory. @boaboyoz calls the vehicle a sexy beast, highlighting its awesome build and mentioning the high initial bid of $300k. @BMWE90Guy expresses his dream of owning and driving a GT2RS, emphasizing its desirability and allure.
Neutral: @usjepecl (The Seller) clarifies some details regarding the car's tires, stating that they are aged but not worn, and offers to install new tires if preferred by bidders. The seller mentions that the car is currently being serviced and is in top shape, emphasizing their intention for the next owner to drive and enjoy it. Additional inquiries from potential buyers regarding features and specifications indicate a robust interest and engagement with the auction community.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Triumph27 about the car's expensive paint protection film juxtaposed with its old tires, questioning the owner's choices. @marv800 and @BrokenLotus both speculate on whether the presence of a roll cage suggests significant track time, with @marv800 pointing out discrepancies in the seller's claims about the car's track history. Some users like @Imadood express curiosity about the number of previous owners, hinting at potential red flags regarding the vehicle's history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Jmankoo shares nostalgic memories of their own TR250, expressing their pride and love for the vehicle. They appreciate the sound and driving video of the car and wish the seller good luck with the auction. @Vette2 praises the vehicle's aesthetics, noting the nice paint job, wire wheels, and redline tires, while recognizing the rarity of the TR250 model with the surrey option. @augopher refers to the car as a classic British roadster, encouraging potential buyers to drive it enthusiastically. @GLCC2017 (The Seller) emphasizes the car's good condition, performance, and strength of the engine, asserting it's a nice example of the Triumph nameplate while addressing inquiries about its features.
Neutral: @Richornot acknowledges the fun of seeing a TR250 that is similar to their TR5 but raises concerns about the car's details, such as the id tag placement and possible engine replacement. @ima68tr sees the auction as a potential deal considering the car's original features while noting some issues like oil pressure and door fit. @Polaris550 comments on the car's journey through various states and highlights inconsistencies with the engine's originality and color history, providing historical context. @mikeor and @bmwspyder question details about the vehicle's components, showing interest in understanding the features and modifications.
Negative: @e023942 criticizes the lack of reference to the aluminum surrey top, indicating it makes the car feel incomplete. @SSBN629 raises alarms about the low oil pressure revealed in the driving video and suggests it might pose issues. @CarterB767 expresses concern over the car's low idle oil pressure while generally finding it visually appealing. @malloryross points out inconsistencies in parts that appear to belong to different Triumph models, suggesting potential modifications. @Christoph notes that the previous owner made questionable suspension modifications, raising the need for further inspection while stating it still appears tidy.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the 1958 Chevrolet Impala, with many users praising its stunning appearance and the nostalgic memories it evokes. @Dollycat3 expressed excitement for the color combination, noting that '58 Impala’s are their favorite. @boaboyoz called it an incredible specimen, and @mike_rockwell reminisced about the sound and look of the car, which he modified in his youth. @TJClassic linked the Impala to fond memories of classic films, emphasizing the car's timeless appeal. Others echoed sentiments of beauty and rarity, suggesting a deep emotional connection to this iconic vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments addressed specific features and historical aspects of the car. @jsebby inquired about the type of power top, while @Tex-Ron pointed out the absence of air conditioning. @Morecarsforme shared commentary on the transmission model, which he believed to have similarities with other models. @Bordeaux, along with @vpchianese, discussed the use of mini air filters and their advantages, providing a technical perspective on the modifications common among classic car enthusiasts. The seller, @johnfw, engaged with potential buyers, offering information about wheel sets and addressing queries about the car's condition.
Negative: However, not all comments were entirely positive. @lanny210 mentioned a discrepancy regarding the horsepower, while @martyspaulding criticized the prevalence of firetruck red paint, finding it off-putting and indicating the cost to change it would be significant. @Lewis advised against installing a continental kit as it is seen as a cliché. @justf raised concerns regarding the car's VIN verification, which could be problematic in certain states and affect the car's value significantly. Such issues showcase a mix of enthusiasm with necessary caution regarding the purchase and restoration of classic vehicles.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Remyhound described the vehicle as "Super Nice," showcasing their admiration for the car. @Pbedard22 echoed similar sentiment, calling it "Beautiful in black!" highlighting the vehicle's aesthetic appeal. @ZAV89 also appreciated the Viper's appearance, stating it is a "Great looking viper!" indicating a strong positive perception of its design.
Neutral: Several comments focused on specific inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition and features rather than expressing strong feelings in either direction. @dwiggin10 confirmed to @Pbedard22 that he does not have a lift available to provide more detailed undercarriage photos. Furthermore, he informed @ZAV89 that he would be unable to create driving videos until his return on Tuesday, maintaining a neutral stance on the current availability of visual content. @pwrful4 inquired about the tires' age, and @dwiggin10 answered that they were replaced in 2018 with Michelin Pilot Sport tires.
Negative: On the other hand, there were some concerns raised by @HJO regarding the head gaskets. @dwiggin10 responded that the gaskets have not been replaced due to the low mileage of 2,086, which may worry potential buyers about the vehicle's long-term reliability. Overall, while many praised the aesthetics, there were notable inquiries that suggest some potential buyers are cautious about certain aspects of the vehicle's condition.
30-Years-Owned Modified 1969 Jeep Jeepster Commando V6 4-Speed
8705F1757419
Lot 192441
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm about the vehicle's build quality and uniqueness. @GnarShredder calls it a "Tough rig," indicating confidence in its durability. @RQQ acknowledges the seller as trustworthy, while @justjeepsters reminisces about its impressive history, mentioning it as a head-turner and a show winner. @Skorch appreciates the detailed craftsmanship, stating that it's hard to find this level of detail in a Jeepster today, and encourages the seller with good luck wishes. Overall, the comments paint a picture of a well-built and special vehicle that has garnered respect from enthusiasts.
Neutral: The seller, @Jeepsterman2, provides detailed information about the Jeepster's history and features, explaining the modifications and current state of the vehicle. He describes the Jeepster as a labor of love built over 30 years, capable of handling trails while also being eye-catching on the street. Potential buyers inquire about specific features like highway speed capabilities and the condition of the tailgate, while @nosnarb questions the Jeep's highway speed performance. @rustyray asks for a driving video to better understand its capabilities, showing a mixture of curiosity and interest in the vehicle's performance.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about the Jeepster's current performance issues. @nosnarb and @rustyray bring attention to its ability to maintain highway speeds, while @Jeepsterman2 reveals that the Jeep has experienced a heating issue that is being addressed by a mechanic. He mentions a new concern has arisen during repairs, indicating ongoing trouble. The mention of needing a new title and the difficulties in securing the original plates adds to the uncertainty surrounding the sale, which could deter potential bidders who prefer a smoother transaction process.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @H185 (The Seller) mentions that the bike is 100% California street legal, which could make it an attractive option for potential buyers. They also highlight the bike's appealing condition, suggesting that it is well-maintained and ready for enjoyment. @Batfan2 compliments the bike for still having the required California EPA can, which is an important regulatory feature for street legality.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the bike's registration status and the process for obtaining a street title. @misterco raises a question about the bike's off-highway title and its street legality in California, while @TedLitvin expresses concern about the possibility of registering it for street use. @H185 (The Seller) provides context about its registration history and offers assistance for the buyer who wishes to have it titled for highway use.
Negative: @SSlinkard expresses frustration over the high shipping costs associated with the bike, describing it as a potential deal breaker despite believing it's a nice little bike. Additionally, @JGraham questions the necessity of registering a trials bike as street legal, indicating a sentiment that may deter some buyers who view it primarily for off-road use. @misterco's concerns and doubts about the registration process also highlight potential hurdles for prospective buyers considering legal street use.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Patmansfield highlighted the undervalued nature of the Porsche 911 Cabriolet, expressing satisfaction with his own experience after extensive modifications. He appreciates the smooth gearbox, functional air conditioning, and quality sound system, showing a strong affection for the car despite overspending on improvements. @G4horse positively commented, calling it a "Nice Clean Ride!" which reflects a favorable general perception of the vehicle’s condition.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics, the seller, provided comprehensive information about the auction, detailing the car's specs and condition, as well as offering insights into their business practices, including a high Google review rating. They also responded to inquiries regarding details like the vehicle's condition and history, including service records and inspection status. @mdoyle24 asked about the car's ability to meet California emissions standards, and @Emroko questioned the IMS bearing status, which shows potential buyers are engaged and seeking clarification.
Negative: Concerns arose about the vehicle's physical condition, with @German66 pointing out potential imperfections on the passenger front fascia and rim. @mrahm17 inquired about discrepancies in the color of the convertible top, indicating some confusion around the car's features. Additionally, @iamjjlister raised concerns regarding the clutch replacement and service records for the convertible top, illustrating buyer apprehension about potential maintenance issues.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight several positive aspects, particularly from @INTERCARUSA, the seller, who presents the 2015 Porsche Cayenne diesel as an excellent choice for summer road trips, showcasing its desirable features like a factory towing package and a panoramic sunroof. @privaterelay9000 expresses confidence in the vehicle's condition, noting the extensive 42 service records which signal responsible previous ownership, and the assurance of a rust-free undercarriage adds to its appeal. Overall, the seller's enthusiastic presentation and the assurance of a well-maintained vehicle resonate positively with potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries clarify the car's condition and history. @BBone33 asks about the completion of the Dieselgate emissions system retrofit, to which @INTERCARUSA responds that it was completed on September 2, 2016, at a specific mileage, providing transparency in its maintenance history. Additionally, @privaterelay9000 seeks more pictures of the undercarriage due to concerns about rust, and the seller addresses this by confirming the absence of rust and subsequently providing more images, which is a common transparency practice that speaks to the competitiveness and integrity of the listing.
Negative: There were minor concerns raised regarding the vehicle's condition, especially from potential bidders like @privaterelay9000 who expressed fear about rust due to the vehicle's East Coast history. While @INTERCARUSA reassured them that the car is clean and rust-free, the initial concern reflects a common apprehension among buyers regarding vehicles from specific regions. However, there were no substantial negative comments about the vehicle's performance or features, indicating that concerns primarily revolve around transparency and visual verification of the car's condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight the 2003 Ford Excursion as an exceptional vehicle, with @CMAC1326 (The Seller) emphasizing extensive maintenance and modifications to ensure reliability and performance. @Storm33 showcases their enthusiasm, noting that the Excursion garners attention at gas stations due to its popularity and solid design. The seller's efforts in treating the frame and underbody for rust, along with numerous upgrades such as new batteries and a full flow external oil filter, are praised, indicating that whoever ends up with the vehicle will be satisfied and ready for long trips.
Neutral: Several questions posed by @phatfill reflect the curiosity of potential bidders about the vehicle's condition and accessories. Inquiries about the exhaust system, roof condition, and functionality of window vents and swing doors showcase buyers' desire for detailed information prior to making a decision. Additionally, @SlowPokeRodriguez's question about any evidence of smoking indicates an interest in the vehicle's interior status, which @CMAC1326 clarifies stating that there has never been smoking in the vehicle.
Negative: While the comments generally lean positive, there is an underlying concern regarding certain aspects of the vehicle. @phatfill expressed the need for updated images of specific parts, such as the roof and rear interior, which may imply uncertainty about the vehicle's aesthetic condition. Furthermore, the question about the exhaust being OEM suggests scrutiny over whether any parts may require future attention, despite @CMAC1326 confirming its originality and assuring that anti-rust measures have been taken.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Mthymama (The Seller) provides reassurance that there are no back fees associated with the vehicle and everything is current as of May 2025. The seller also mentions that they have cleaned the engine area for better visibility, indicating a level of care and attention to the vehicle's condition. Additionally, the seller communicates willingness to address inquiries from potential buyers and offers to take additional photos to clarify any concerns, showing responsiveness and accessibility.
Neutral: Several comments indicate an interest in the condition of specific parts of the vehicle. @JAR46 inquires about the need for repairs on door sills, fenders, and the status of door jams, specifically whether they are solid or rusted. @sia417 also requests pictures of the rockers, indicating a desire for clarity on potential rust issues. @adamc69 raises concerns about the vehicle's operational status, asking about any DMV back fees, which @Mthymama (The Seller) addresses by confirming the vehicle is not subject to additional fees.
Negative: @JAR46 expresses frustration over not receiving direct answers to previous inquiries, particularly about the condition of the door jams, suggesting that communication may not be thorough or prompt enough to satisfy potential buyers. The repeated requests for clarity on parts of the vehicle point to a potential concern regarding transparency from the seller. Furthermore, the mention of rust and repairs by various commenters introduces uncertainty about the vehicle's overall condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express high satisfaction regarding the features and quality of the 2021 Chevrolet Express Explorer Limited SE Conversion Van. @sportstx (The Seller) highlights its blend of comfort, utility, and luxury travel, making it suitable for road trips and family transportation. @Ibtbone praises Explorer for being a top choice in van conversions and appreciates the brand's ongoing reputation for high-quality conversions. Additionally, @Degencarguy mentions the near-new condition of the Michelin tires, indicating that the vehicle is well-maintained.
Neutral: The comments also address practical aspects of the vehicle such as the seating and towing capabilities. @Redfish28 brings up inquiries about the towing package and brake controller, engaging in a discussion about the specific features that affect towing performance. @svenknut1 asks about the ease of removing the second-row bucket seats, which @sportstx confirms can swivel and detach effortlessly. This exchange indicates a balanced interest in functionality alongside comfort.
Negative: However, there are some concerns mentioned by users that could affect potential buyers' decisions. @Redfish28 questions the presence of a brake controller in a vehicle equipped with a heavy-duty trailer package, suggesting that its absence is unexpected. Furthermore, the uncertainty surrounding the coiled wire located under the bumper raises additional questions, with commenters speculating about its purpose, including potential air ride suspension preparations as noted by @duanecwhite. Overall, these doubts reflect a cautious approach to the vehicle's features.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Numerous comments express a strong appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its unique beauty and charm. @markb3 describes it as a 'beauty', while @Mowog believes there isn't a better example on the planet. @NorCalBert shares a nostalgic memory of their first encounter with a Multipla, referring to it as beautiful and expressing enthusiasm with a supportive wish for the auction. @alicep notes how the sight of a Multipla can turn around a bad day, and @LongDucDong admires the car's classy design despite joking about its safety in collisions. @DeanDekki encourages potential buyers not to hesitate about purchasing this particular Multipla because of its well-preserved condition and rarity in the market.
Neutral: The comments also include mixed observations about the Multipla's performance and historical context. @Pinot64 shares a fond memory of how the Multipla functioned as a shared taxi in Italy during the 70s, emphasizing the communal aspect of the vehicle while reflecting on the quirks of its transportation method. @Nolasport, the seller, provides context for the auction, mentioning the car's background and its award from a gathering, indicating its collector status. The insights from different commenters show a blend of admiration and appreciation for the vehicle's character, while acknowledging the potential for past trends in value.
Negative: On the critical side, @Classichondaman questions the future value trajectory of the Multipla, recalling that it previously increased in value and then decreased. Additionally, @ssgnyg14 provides constructive criticism by noting the absence of the air chamber vent flap, explaining how this could affect engine warming in colder conditions. They go on to mention potential issues with engine modifications, discouraging the idea of fitting an incompatible engine. These insights suggest that while the car has its charm, there are practical considerations and potential challenges for owners.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle's overall condition and maintenance history, with @thetimeisnow2023 noting that it is a 'great looking G!' The G63 is described by the seller as having been meticulously maintained, with a clean title and extensive service records from reputable Mercedes service centers like W.I. Simonson and AE German. The truck has been garaged, indicating a high level of care from its one owner, which helps to establish confidence in its condition. Commenters also appreciate its stunning aesthetic, with the contrasting white exterior and black interior being highlighted as particularly eye-catching.
Neutral: The seller has provided detailed information about the vehicle, confirming that it has been continuously serviced and is up to date with its maintenance, including recent work totaling over $4,500. The comments from various users indicate curiosity about the car's features, such as the year it started to include CarPlay, original documentation, and potential tire replacements. `@wujohnny10` has asked for maintenance records and updates, while `@Gprotein` inquired about the number of keys and manuals included. The seller has responded promptly to these queries, providing more information and assurance about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Some potential buyers have raised concerns regarding minor imperfections, particularly around the potential for rust, as noted by `@wujohnny10`. The seller acknowledged finding small signs of surface rust and basic oxidation on some bolts, although they emphasized that the vehicle is overall very dry and clean. Additionally, the seller recommended replacing the tires if driven regularly, which may deter some buyers. The mention of the rim's coating needing attention also presents a potential downside, as it hints at some cosmetic issues that could require further investment.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed strong admiration for the vehicle, praising its aesthetic appeal and unique features. @2b2 noted that the angel eyes enhance the look of the car, while @Andremedina44 highlighted the gorgeous build, particularly enjoying the wheels and euro headlights. @itsshnowin also commended the car's condition, specifically mentioning the stylish design elements. @PG2003 celebrated the exceptional appeal of the Alpina wheels, calling them 'sexy' and suggesting they could improve the look of any vehicle. The seller, @MyClassic540i, appreciated the positive feedback shared by these commenters, particularly noting the favorable comments about the Hamann kit, Alpina wheels, and Euro headlights.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about the vehicle's specifications and performance details. @BlueBimmers asked about the type of headlights and expressed a desire for an aftermarket muffler, reflecting a personal preference for vehicle enhancements. @Acapulco requested cold start and driving videos to better assess the car's performance. Additionally, @hankzweb raised concerns about intermittent leaks, prompting the seller to clarify the maintenance history regarding a valve cover gasket leak without indicating any major ongoing issues. The seller also offered additional information about factory components that come with the vehicle, such as the original headlights and a spare set of wheels.
Negative: A few comments hinted at potential areas for improvement or concerns about the vehicle. @2b2 suggested that a muffler delete and tune could enhance the car's performance, implying that some adjustments might be needed to reach its full potential. @hankzweb's inquiry about intermittent leaks points to possible issues the vehicle may face, which the seller confirmed, acknowledging minor oil drips and a gasket leak. While the seller provided reassurance about the overall condition, these comments suggest that some buyers may have reservations about the vehicle's reliability and maintenance history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters have praised the vehicle for its aesthetic appeal and upgrades. @LaMartian noted the presence of air conditioning as a cool feature, while @dj_walls2424 highlighted the Cobra's enhancements, including IRS and Wilwood brakes. @SimplexFish described the car as a perfect specimen, reflecting a strong appreciation for its overall condition and design. Additionally, @RBcobro expressed admiration for the vehicle's color, further contributing to its positive reception among potential buyers.
Neutral: The vehicle's seller, @Rfstratton2000, actively engaged with various inquiries related to the car's specifications and overall history. They confirmed the car’s setup, stating that all parts were new from FFR and providing details about the footwell drop and IRS. There was also mention of registration issues and emissions requirements, with @philbo427 seeking clarification about the Massachusetts VIN and how it affects emissions exemptions. The seller provided insights about the car's history in Massachusetts and its current registration in New Hampshire, giving potential buyers a clearer picture of the vehicle's status.
Negative: There were inquiries that raised concerns about the vehicle's specifics. @HMRHEAD questioned the visibility of the interior features through the photos, particularly about the dropped footbox. @Cdn043 expressed skepticism about the wheel safety wires being purely decorative, which opened a discussion about the vehicle's modified setups. Furthermore, @Lopie21 questioned whether there were any mechanical issues, to which the seller responded by assuring that the car was in perfect working condition, though the initial inquiry pointed to potential ambiguities regarding the car's operational history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BlitzLead praises the R1100RT as the best road bike for long rides, highlighting its capacity for smooth and quick travel. @SDCR appreciates it as the perfect motorbike for a fly-and-ride experience, indicating that it may be ideal for spontaneous adventures. @Gman7501 also admires the bike's beauty, which reinforces the positive perception of its aesthetics and overall appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @ForeignAffairsMN, provides thorough answers to potential buyers. They confirm that the wheels are free of scratches or dings and that the ABS system operates correctly, with lights indicating system checks. They clarify their role as primarily a Euro car repair shop rather than motorcycle specialists, but they are committed to answering inquiries to assist interested bidders.
Negative: There aren't many negative comments directly about the vehicle itself; however, @originalbob's inquiry about the presence of dings or tire installation scratches on the wheels suggests a concern that some buyers might have regarding the bike's condition. Additionally, @Gman7501 inadvertently flagged @originalbob, which implies some confusion or apprehension regarding the inquiry, although this was clarified by the commenter.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the vehicle's history and features, with @Hoppy18 mentioning that it is a $25k car, comparing it favorably to others in its class. @PeachStateClassics highlights its unique color combo and suggests that it retains its original metal, making it a desirable collectible. In addition, @MRW2011 points out a significant positive aspect, stating that it was built in Dearborn without unnecessary smog pump additions, indicating its original simplicity and performance potential.
Neutral: There are some mixed comments regarding the vehicle's technical details and listings. @CarFoolLane brings up a technical error related to the serpentine belt documentation, clarifying how the car actually uses v-belts instead. @PeachStateClassics adds humor, suggesting that those writing the auction descriptions should be well-informed to avoid confusion. Likewise, the inquiry by @gccch for a look at the carburetor and a picture of the carb id tag indicates a neutral curiosity about the vehicle's parts and authenticity.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about the vehicle's operation, particularly from @trickortreat, who notes that it takes time to start after sitting, which may be seen as a drawback. The exchange between commenters, including @CarFoolLane's critique of the vehicle's listing details and @PeachStateClassics' jest about verification, suggests a lack of trust in the information being presented. Overall, there is skepticism regarding the accuracy of the auction descriptions and the condition of specific components.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @HBTFD commented on the vehicle's aesthetic saying, "what a beauty," highlighting its visual appeal. @mark_99 also praised the combination of colors, describing the interior's dark red upholstery paired with a light tan exterior as a great match, calling it a beauty and even giving it a trophy emoji to emphasize his admiration.
Neutral: @txcharlie inquired about the presence of idle and drive videos, showing interest in the vehicle's functionality and performance. @mark_99 asked multiple questions regarding the factory location that built the truck and speculated on the type of paint used, indicating curiosity about its background and condition. @mike_rockwell found the truck interesting and noticed modifications that might suggest a custom build, pointing out specific features like the modified tailgate and dash.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, @mike_rockwell pointed out some cosmetic issues that need addressing, such as unfilled holes in the dash where previous mounts were located, suggesting that the appearance could be improved. He implied that these modifications, rather than enhancing the vehicle, detract from its overall appeal. @txcharlie's concern about the power steering pump's noise, which had been an issue in previous auction videos, indicates ongoing reliability concerns even though @JamesBoat clarified that the problem has been resolved.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @KNDETAILING (The Seller) has highlighted the extensive care the 1999 Honda Vamos has received, stating that it has undergone a comprehensive refresh that includes a timing service, an ignition refresh, fluid changes, A/C service, and brake work. The detailing process was also thorough, featuring a steam clean, ozone treatment, sound deadening installation, and multi-step paint correction protected with ceramic coatings. Commenters like @cincycaddy appreciate the completed maintenance work, emphasizing it as a significant bonus that makes the van ready for immediate use without typical maintenance concerns. Enthusiasts such as @Blackbelt and @OcBoyz714 express their admiration for the vehicle's appeal, noting its utility as an urban commuter and its unique aesthetic.
Neutral: Several questions about the vehicle were raised, particularly regarding its legal status and registration in the U.S. @Terry2 and @Abi1kenobi queried about its street legality and California registration, to which @KNDETAILING (The Seller) confirmed that the Honda Vamos is street legal in all 50 states under the 25-year rule and can potentially be registered in California, albeit with more challenges due to emissions requirements. Some commenters discussed the vehicle's features and specifications, such as the original radio settings for Japanese frequencies and the folding mirrors, indicating a mix of curiosity and practical concerns surrounding usability. The vehicle's compact size was noted by @K29b as advantageous for maneuverability.
Negative: There were a few concerns raised about the Honda Vamos, mainly focusing on the specifics of its transmission and overall condition. @Minus10 asked for clarification regarding whether the van had a 4-speed or 3-speed automatic transmission, and what cosmetic or mechanical defects may exist. @KNDETAILING (The Seller) clarified that the Vamos has a 3-speed automatic and is in excellent condition with minor wear appropriate for its age, which was reassuring but still highlights a common apprehension buyers have concerning vehicle history and upkeep. The nature of JDM imports brings up additional worries about finding service for such vehicles in the U.S., which @cincycaddy touched on, reflecting the hesitancy some potential buyers might feel.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, with remarks like @GDogg referring to it as "absolutely stunning" and @MarklandR noting it as a "pretty build." Others commend the build quality and the effort put into the restoration, with @AD15 highlighting it as a "solid conversion all around" and @Secondluckiest imagining it as a perfect cruiser on California highways. There's a general appreciation for the craftsmanship as well, with @Jimmy_P acknowledging the car as a "beautiful car" and applauding the work involved in creating the custom replica.
Neutral: There is some confusion surrounding the vehicle's identity, with @jcmc97 questioning its designation as an M3 convertible and @Weekend_garage seeking clarification on the original vehicle model. The seller, @Travolta200, responds by confirming that the car started life as a 1988 325 convertible and is now an E30 M3 replica. Various commenters, including @mikeor and @bmwdude, mention issues regarding the vehicle's original specifications and modifications without overt criticism, indicating a need for clarity in the listing's narrative.
Negative: Some criticisms have been directed at the sale's presentation. @ExplorMoar deems the description "absolutely wildly confusing" and urges for a clearer representation of the build, while @rmoudry believes it is "clear this is not an M3" and just a clone. Furthermore, questions regarding specific build aspects such as the fitment of the rear bumper have been raised by @AD15, who points out that the bumper does not appear to run fully horizontal, sparking a back-and-forth discussion with the seller about potential issues in the vehicle's aesthetics.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters like @MLINKK and @sunks000 expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, with @MLINKK stating it looks 'gorgeous' and @sunks000 leaving fire emojis to signify excitement about its appearance. Additionally, @GDogg noted the appealing design of the 'Triple Black C4S Cabriolet', highlighting its attractive styling as a selling point.
Neutral: The seller, @Collectibleclassics, provided detailed information about the auction and the vehicle's history, confirming it is a unique 2006 Porsche 911 Carrera 4S Cabriolet with 26,000 miles. They emphasized their reputation as active sellers on Bring a Trailer and highlighted their high Google review ratings. They also invited potential buyers to inspect the vehicle and provided logistical support for shipping and contact options.
Negative: However, some concerns were raised by @kni7fer regarding the validation of the vehicle's cold start video. They suggested that potential bidders may need further assurances, such as temperature readings, to confirm the car was indeed cold at startup. This indicates some skepticism among prospective buyers about the authenticity of claims made by the seller.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments indicate a strong appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic and build quality. @daddreams describes the Defender as having a 'Gorgeous spec' and expresses anticipation for the auction, suggesting it has caught the attention of observers. @FentonCarlisle praises specific design choices, highlighting the brushed aluminum bezels and the restrained upgrades as appealing features. The inclusion of dirt road photos is also positively received, with @Artistico noting that the truck looks good and fits its natural habitat, which adds to its overall charm.
Neutral: Some comments focus on practical aspects and suggestions regarding the auction and visibility of the listing. @WAGONBOYTD points out that the auction seems quiet given the vehicle's quality and suggests enhancing the listing with more captivating photographs to boost interest. Similarly, @cvlawson asks for clarity on the model's authenticity and service history, indicating a desire for more transparent details which could attract potential bidders. There is a general recognition that despite the current slow bidding, interest remains in the vehicle.
Negative: On the negative side, there are concerns over the auction's current pace and presentation issues. @WAGONBOYTD critiques the lead photo for failing to attract bidders due to its lack of contrast, indicating that it may not be showcasing the vehicle's appeal effectively. @cvlawson's question about whether this is a 'santana' model implies some skepticism about its designation, emphasizing a need for confirmation of its authenticity. Lastly, the overall slow bidding process signals a worry that not enough potential buyers are engaging with the auction.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CRUSH expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, declaring a love for square body trucks. @chayseee comments on its nice appearance and inquires about a cold start video. @DuffysRC (The Seller) appreciates the early bids and interaction from potential buyers, indicating readiness to provide more information and live video updates.
Neutral: @DuffysRC (The Seller) responds to questions about the truck, confirming that it does not have A/C and advising on its reliability for a potential trip to St. Louis. They also provide a cold start video upon request, showing willingness to engage with the audience.
Negative: @Gofourit2 raises concerns about the lack of air conditioning, labeling it an air delete truck and questioning the practicality of that feature in hot climates. They also express uncertainty regarding the sunroof's functionality, hinting at potential issues with leaks.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received several positive comments highlighting its beauty and desirability. @David993S praised the SL550 for being great-looking and expressed hope that the auction does better than a previous one, emphasizing the smooth driving experience and power of the car. @David993S also mentioned that cars like this often don’t accumulate many miles if they are part of a multi-car garage. Additionally, @Crjr noted the overall beauty of the SL, showing appreciation for the car's aesthetics, while @rmoudry appreciated the transparency of the imperfections video provided by the seller.
Neutral: There were some neutral inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @hrivasmd expressed curiosity about how the car only has 17k miles despite having five previous owners, which reflects a sense of skepticism rather than outright doubt. @BILLTKC asked about the top operation and if the brief hesitation shown in the video was normal, illustrating a common concern among potential buyers about the vehicle's functional aspects. Additionally, @aak77 questioned the maintenance records, specifically about fluid changes and the condition of the dust covers, indicating a desire for clarification rather than a negative stance.
Negative: On the downside, not all comments were entirely favorable; @nobears expressed a dislike for the wood steering wheel design, implying a preference for a more modern aesthetic. Furthermore, @aak77 raised concerns about the maintenance history by questioning whether the fluids had been changed recently and the overall condition of the struts. @Crjr's inquiry about the stains on the trunk carpet reflects skepticism about the car's condition, although this was addressed by the seller. Overall, concerns about maintenance and design preferences were highlighted, indicating that potential issues could deter some buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight a strong appreciation for the vehicle, with @letthegypsyhaveit stating that this model Ford is the best pick-up ever made, reflecting a favorable reputation. @P42DC praised the truck's 5.8L engine, confirming its availability in the F-250s, while @Todd_Z. noted that it was a sought-after truck for those looking to repurpose parts for early Broncos. Additionally, @eric8 expressed admiration for the truck's appearance, inquiring about features like the rear differential, suggesting a general positive perception among enthusiasts. The seller, @ElevatedMotorsCO, confirmed the operational status of various features, which added to the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: Comments contained factual inquiries and confirmations. For example, @Porkchop17 questioned the seat's power adjustments and noted some inconsistencies in the listing, while @astamps3 expressed interest in viewing the vehicle in person. @ElevatedMotorsCO provided clarification about the seat being manual with power lumbar, and assured that all functionalities like lights and A/C are working perfectly. @bringatrailer expressed gratitude for the updated listing, indicating a constructive interaction regarding the advertisement and specifications of the truck.
Negative: Some comments indicated disappointment or skepticism, notably from @oldjonny, who criticized the absence of advanced infotainment features in favor of older technology, declaring his disinterest. @Porkchop17 pointed out a contradiction in the seating description provided by the seller compared to the listing, which could reflect potential concerns about accuracy in the vehicle's advertised features. Overall, while most comments were generally positive or neutral, there was a thread of discontent regarding the vehicle's perceived modernity and listing accuracy.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments from @SullivanAutoHouse highlight the Defender 90 as an impressive vehicle that is ready for a new owner to enjoy. They emphasize the combination of high-end restoration, mechanical upgrades, and appealing color, generating excitement about the auction. @WAGONBOYTD mentions the attractiveness of the Defender in its neighborhood, suggesting a good exterior appeal, while @ViperGTS41 offers a positive outlook on the vehicle's performance after cleaning the circuit board related to the fuel light issue, indicating that it runs great overall.
Neutral: @MoxieMotors inquired about the vehicle's towing capacity, raising a technical question regarding its horsepower. @Maroon_Womverine asked about the presence of seat belts in the rear jump seats, receiving confirmation from @SullivanAutoHouse that there are none. Additionally, there were technical discussions about the fuel gauge readings, with various comments addressing low fuel light discrepancies, showcasing ongoing dialogue about the car's features and conditions.
Negative: There were concerns raised about the fuel gauge functionality, particularly noted by @Maroon_Womverine, who pointed out conflicting readings between the fuel gauge and the low fuel light. This issue was further confirmed by @ViperGTS41, who explained it as a common problem within the D90 community. Despite the assurance that some fixes could be made, the mention of potential recurring issues could deter some potential buyers, indicating that not all aspects of the vehicle's condition are ideal.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received positive comments highlighting its beauty and overall condition. @mikeor remarked on its stunning appearance and is eagerly awaiting @Linkou72's story about the car. @JosephAuto praised the color combination and described it as a fun car, while @Maxwell077 expressed enthusiasm for the car's look and wheels. @Linkou72, the seller, shared that the car was a generous gift and emphasized the extensive care and refurbishment it has undergone, mentioning that nearly $8K has been spent on servicing, including new tires and a radio, producing a polished and well-maintained vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters brought up neutral observations about the car, discussing aspects that could have been clarified. @OneAlfaShort inquired about any leaks mentioned in the service history, to which @Linkou72 confirmed minimal seepage at the rear without any significant issues. @njt286 and others pointed out potential concerns like bubbling paint on the quarter panel and minor cosmetic issues, which @Linkou72 addressed by clarifying that these imperfections are mostly superficial and do not affect the car's overall integrity. Additionally, there are no indications of significant rust, as the car has not been driven in harsh weather conditions in recent years.
Negative: On the negative side, there are mentions of minor issues regarding the vehicle's condition. @BobCooper noted concerns related to worn transmission mounts, leading to occasional vibrations, although @Linkou72 reassured that this does not affect performance. There were also discussions about paint bubbling and superficial rust, as raised by @njt286. @Linkou72 acknowledged some minor bubbling he hadn't previously noticed and clarified that the paint chip and bumper displacement were present when the car was received, implying that some cosmetic repairs may be needed. Some potential buyers seem concerned about these issues, indicating a slight apprehension about the vehicle's overall reliability and aesthetic appeal.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Assam expresses admiration for the vehicle, noting the nice photos. @GCEA (The Seller) emphasizes the strong performance and eye-catching design of the 1980 Jeep CJ-7, describing it as 'beastly' with a powerful 5.3L Vortec V8 and a 5-speed manual transmission. They have been proactive in providing updates, including upcoming videos that showcase the Jeep's capabilities and overall condition as the auction progresses, urging potential bidders to stay tuned and participate.
Neutral: @zrozell asks about the type of transmission, to which @GCEA (The Seller) responds that it features a near bullet-proof AX15, noting its smooth drive. @dawg55 inquires about the functionality of various components including gauges and signals, and The Seller confirms that everything is operational, although they are still checking on the heater. @GCEA provides consistent updates on the auction status, including reminders to bidders about the time left to submit their bids.
Negative: While most comments lean positive, @apester4u raises a question regarding the $425 dealer fee, pointing out the inconsistency in charges among dealers without receiving a direct answer. This indicates some buyer concern about additional costs associated with the purchase, which could be seen as a potential drawback for interested bidders.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TheDudeAbides2 mentions that the LS is a great looking vehicle with a strong specification, praising the comfort of the air suspension for long trips. @CleanMcqueen shares their experience with a low mileage 2007 model, expressing disbelief that the car feels dated, stating it to be very comfortable and great for long trips. @oldkystude adds that their LS600HL with Dynamic Air Suspension is fun to drive in SPORT mode, suggesting that the car can provide a thrilling experience despite the general perception of it being boring.
Neutral: @sy1616 recalls their previous experience with a 2006 LS430, mentioning that while it was a good car, they found it boring and less engaging compared to newer models, inquiring whether the current offerings feel more modern. @vamax seeks clarification about the specifications of the vehicle's powertrain, while @lawplay asks whether the car is equipped with air shocks, indicating an interest in specific performance features. @cpa713 expresses their desire for Lexus to reintroduce the Truffle Mica color, showing a subjective preference for vehicle aesthetics.
Negative: @djbillbass raises concerns about visible inconsistencies in the vehicle's paint job, suggesting that the back half of the car appears darker than the front, and @emta79 states that several images indicate potential repainting of various areas, including the front bumper and door. @TheButchersSon points out that the interior may have been repainted and re-textured, while @emta79 further supports this observation by noting discrepancies in paint between the door jamb and exterior. The seller, @genevamotorcars, responds defensively, downplaying the concerns raised while reaffirming the paint condition, but it remains a point of contention among the commentors.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, noting its impressive setup and craftsmanship. @tintinmilou highlighted his love for the design, especially the colored drawers that contribute to a charming camping experience. @oldcarjunky mentioned the vehicle's outstanding condition, complimenting its engine and underside. @kevinb also praised its show-ready cleanliness, suggesting that the investment in restoration was substantial and well worth it. @TurtleVan particularly enjoyed the addition of the coffee maker, emphasizing how it enhances the camping and family experience. Overall, there was a shared appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and functional features.
Neutral: The seller, @delzey, provided informative comments detailing specific enhancements and modifications made to the bus. They discussed the practical aspects, including converting the windshield washer system and adding a Honda generator for power supply. Moreover, @ASEMasterTech posed technical questions regarding cam and carb specifications, showing interest in the vehicle's mechanical aspects. @delzey clarified various features, including the heating system and the inclusion of an awning, while also revealing a playful backstory about the vehicle's previous ownership. These exchanges reflect a mix of curiosity and technical engagement with the vehicle's features.
Negative: While the overall perception was positive, there were some concerns raised. @Fargie pointed out that the van's modifications might not comply with California emissions standards due to the removal of fuel injection, which could potentially limit its marketability. @luisda23 inquired about the heating and cooling capabilities, highlighting a gap in comfort features. Despite these issues, most commentators remained optimistic about the vehicle's unique charm and the effort put into its restoration.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @michaelmotorcar highlights the exceptional condition of the 1979 Pontiac Trans Am, boasting only 5000 miles and a history of minimal usage. Commenters like @Dean_Laumbach express admiration, calling it a 'time capsule dream car', while @Michaelhicks67 praises the car's excellent preservation, indicating it stands out in car shows. Several users acknowledge the rarity of this model, with @Mazdaseeker noting its beauty and historical significance.
Neutral: Responses indicate curiosity about specific details regarding the vehicle, such as whether the front seats have been recovered (@market525) and the inclusion of additional features like door decals (@distinctivemanagement). There are discussions about the market trends of such classic cars, with @Michaelhicks67 suggesting it may be an ideal time for buyers, despite an apparent decline in bidding activity for similar models featured in recent auctions.
Negative: There are a few more critical observations from users like @habu2 who correct the seller regarding inaccuracies about vehicle features. Additionally, @Michaelhicks67 mentions concerns about the auction reserve price potentially stifling sales, suggesting it may not be the best time for selling given market conditions. Meanwhile, @ENONAB expresses disappointment regarding the lack of original tires on an otherwise pristine car, highlighting concerns over authenticity.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the vehicle's color combination and specifications. @JDNY516 expresses love for the unique color, noting that it received numerous compliments on their previous model with the same finish. @fauxtool points out that the vehicle is well specced, conservative in color, and has necessary maintenance performed, signaling it as one of the better vehicles available. Enthusiasts, such as @Secretariat19 and @Poorhouse, highlight the advantages of the single hump dash for both aesthetics and functionality, agreeing that it contributes positively to the overall driving environment.
Neutral: The seller, @M3forme, provides detailed descriptions of the car's history and condition, such as previous paintwork and repairs that were made prior to their ownership. Comments from @3liter and @kamilo ask for clarifications about the engine's rod bearings and exhaust modifications, respectively, indicating interest in its operational details. Additionally, there are inquiries for inspection such as @Ashton0's request to view the vehicle locally and suggestions for driving videos and paint meter readings from @AUDIologist and @Secretariat19, reflecting the common practice of thorough vetting in car sales.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's history, particularly its past accidents and multiple previous owners, which @Secretariat19 notes may impact perceptions of its value and reliability. Negative remarks about the car come from @DocMcStuffins, who describes the accident history as "ballsy" and notes the need for further disclosure about the incidents. Additionally, there is skepticism from @Secretariat19 about the reported minor damage in the Carfax, pointing out issues with panel alignment that suggest more significant repairs could be necessary. Overall, while the vehicle has desirable attributes, its accident history raises red flags for some potential buyers.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The overall presentation of the vehicle has received positive remarks, particularly regarding its color combination which was noted by @reddib as 'nice.' The seller, @SparksJB, has also been responsive and helpful, expressing gratitude for the interest and comments, which contributes to a positive experience for potential buyers. The included video of the car's radio and antenna operation may further enhance buyers' confidence in the vehicle's functioning capabilities.
Neutral: There are inquiries about the specific condition of the vehicle, such as the status of the electronics and overall functionality, with questions from @weissey2020 and @Viviano regarding the timing chain, cruise control, and any potential leaks in the engine. The seller clarified that the car is still located in Iowa and provided insight into the owner's decision to sell, indicating that it doesn't fit the current theme of the owner's collection after being purchased only a year ago. The seller remains open to further questions, aiming to provide additional clarity to interested bidders.
Negative: Some comments hint at concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @weissey2020 questioned the quick sale after only one year of ownership, raising red flags about the car's reliability or issues that may not be readily apparent. Additionally, frequent questions regarding essential components such as the timing chain, engine leaks, and original instrumentation from various users reflect a level of skepticism about the car's maintenance and performance history, suggesting that potential buyers may need more detailed information to feel secure in their bidding.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as a "beautiful, sexy 2+2," highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @RedBoy, despite not typically being a fan of the 2+2 shape, finds this particular model to be special. @HPLM expresses a growing affection for the 2+2 over the Roadster and Coupe due to its additional space while maintaining similar performance, especially noting the striking red color. @BloodyHell points out the practicality of the E-type, comparing its driving experience to the OTS or Coupe versions at a significantly lower price, suggesting that the majority of viewers will see this model as beautiful automotive art.
Neutral: @dmg4 contributes a friendly note, mentioning that he is a friend of the seller and acknowledges that the seller has been experiencing internet issues. He encourages others to ask questions about the car, assuring them that the vehicle exceeds expectations based on the photos. @borsching (The Seller) thanks commenters for their wonderful remarks about the xke and responds to inquiries about a driving video, indicating that one is being prepared and will be uploaded shortly. @Peterfix67 expresses interest in a driving video, highlighting the community's engagement with the listing.
Negative:
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @roadrosen comments on the vehicle, expressing that it is 'such fun,' indicating a positive and enjoyable driving experience. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, highlights the vehicle's mechanical condition, noting that it has been well maintained with around 53k miles and new tires installed just prior to the sale. This showcases the seller's commitment to quality and providing a reliable vehicle, enhancing potential buyers' confidence in the purchase.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics provides detailed information about the sale process, emphasizing transparency and providing insights into their services. They mention their high customer satisfaction, reflected in their Google Reviews rating of 4.9/5.0, and outline logistics options for potential buyers, such as inspections and shipping. This neutral information serves to inform potential buyers of the logistical aspects and the seller's reliability in transactions without expressing overt positivity or negativity.
Negative: While no outright negative comments are mentioned, the context of the vehicle's sale hints at a backstory involving the prior owner's health issues, which led to the decision to sell. This aspect may cast a slight shadow on the vehicle's history, potentially raising concerns for some buyers about the circumstances surrounding the sale. However, the seller reassures buyers about the vehicle's condition.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters exhibit excitement about the auction, noting the competitive nature of bidding. @Classics4life appreciates the engagement, suggesting that the intense bidding battle was noteworthy and fun. @Evanj27 also expresses optimism, indicating that they look forward to future opportunities to bid and thanking @Classics4life for the good wishes.
Neutral: There are mixed reactions to the price of the vehicle, with @Santa1963 questioning the bidding strategy and suggesting that bids are below market value. @lilkypes engages with @Santa1963, probing deeper into their standpoint. This exchange illustrates a broader conversation about pricing dynamics surrounding high-demand vehicles.
Negative: Some commenters express frustration regarding the auction environment. @pail remarks that the truck prices are too high, suggesting they are out of the bidding war. @Evanj27 humorously claims their financial limits imposed by their 'daddy's allowance' restrict their ability to participate. Overall, there's a sense that not all potential bidders feel comfortable with the current price range.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @mick59 commented on the vehicle's condition, noting that at least the rear apron wasn't hacked and referred to the car as a nice Beetle. @timandsons expressed a sentimental appreciation, recalling the sense of well-being and adventure associated with VW convertibles, regardless of any styling changes. Furthermore, @PWWW (The Seller) assured potential buyers that the rebuilt carburetor motor runs great and starts easily, addressing any initial confusion regarding the vehicle's engine status.
Neutral: @AvionicsTech raised several questions regarding the engine replacement decision and its implications, asking why the switch from fuel injection to carburetor was made and if the clutch was replaced at that time. They also inquired about the capped fan shroud heat ducts and the operation of the front seat levers, indicating thoroughness in their consideration of the vehicle's features. @BostonCharlie acknowledged the delay in posting questions but sought clarification about the cabin heating situation and the condition of rust under the battery area.
Negative: @tomma expressed disappointment over the removal of the fuel injection system, suggesting it would run well if retained. They also mentioned potential smog issues for shipping to California and pointed out discrepancies regarding the fuse box cover alignment. Concerns about the vehicle's suspension and steering components were raised as part of their critique. Additionally, @dbrand19 noticed that the gas gauge was not functioning in a video and questioned if it still works, underlining the vehicle's mechanical reliability.
18k-Mile 2002 Chevrolet Camaro SS Coupe 35th Anniversary GMMG Performance Edition
2G1FP22G422124648
Lot 192461
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Flight23 (The Seller) highlights the detailed history and provenance of the vehicle, mentioning its original purchase in 2019 from the first owner in Chicago. The car comes with complete documentation, including window stickers from Chevrolet, SLP, and GMMG, alongside a comprehensive binder containing emails with notable figures like Camaro Brand Manager Scott Settlemire. This attention to detail underscores the car's unique position as car number 36 of only 52 GMMG Anniversary Camaros made in 2002.
Neutral: Commenters such as @Motor_Fast point out the rarity of the GMMG model, specifically mentioning the SLP centered mounted exhaust, indicating its special status among Camaro enthusiasts. @AutoCan refers to the vehicle as part of a 'secret society', suggesting that familiarity with these cars enhances their appeal, while @MakemineChevy expresses interest in the car's performance by requesting a driving video, acknowledging its desirability in the automotive community.
Negative: While the comments are largely positive or neutral, there are no direct negative remarks about the car itself. The absence of criticisms suggests a favorable perception among those familiar with the model, but it also leaves open the possibility that some potential concerns or critiques may not have been expressed.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @austin_alfa mentions that from a design perspective, the vehicle is stunning and praises the Italians for their impressive work. He notes that there are no flaws to pick at and appreciates the purity of the design and lines. In agreement, @Sumser highlights the elegance of this generation of Italian scooters, appreciating the muted colors that emphasize the scooter's form, especially in contrast to a more vibrant red/white design that disrupted its lines. @Baron_Samedi shares a nostalgic memory of their father buying a similar scooter in 1960, indicating that their early experiences have fostered a lasting passion for two-wheel transport.
Neutral: @Multipla64 (The Seller) provides an informative comment about the auction, indicating that potential buyers can reach out with specific questions regarding the Lambretta. The seller describes the scooter as a nice example of an original model, noting that it is running well and highlights its potential for easy restoration or for riding as-is with basic maintenance.
Negative: @troffer asks where the seller is located, which reflects a lack of clarity in the auction listing about location details. @AbnMike expresses uncertainty about where vintage scooter enthusiasts gather, suggesting that there might be a disconnect between the vehicle's appeal and the enthusiasm of the community. @Multipla64 (The Seller) kindly requests that @troffer submit location inquiries through the proper channels, which may come off as a bit rigid in the context of their earlier invitation for open communication.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg described the vehicle as stunning, both in the wrap and original color, and portrayed it as a fantastic offering. @uncleben expressed enthusiasm about the features like the roll cage and subwoofers. The excitement for the vehicle shines through in these comments, reflecting appreciation for its aesthetics and modifications.
Neutral: @FSE (The Seller) provided updates regarding inquiries from potential buyers, confirming that the vehicle has a standard 16.9 gallon fuel tank and shared a link with an accurate list of options since the original window sticker is unavailable. @notrucks asked about the possibility of removing the blue wrap, to which @FSE confirmed it can be easily removed if the buyer prefers. Additionally, @yamaha8055 inquired about the availability of all stock parts and any previous paint work.
Negative: @GUR89 raised concerns about the car's features, speculating it lacks the sport chrono package and park assist while asking about its history with tracking and potential damages. @Zeneph questioned the authenticity of the carbon fiber trim, while @yamaha8055's inquiries about previous paint work hinted at doubts regarding the vehicle's condition. Overall, these comments suggest apprehension about the car's condition and history.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commentators noted the vehicle's appealing aesthetics with @GLWTA praising the 560SEL as a good-looking car. @shervinator pointed out the correct interior color as Palomino, enhancing the vehicle’s credibility and appeal. Both @ccbrooks and @DCO1961 complimented the original Centra Type 31 wheels and the vehicle's overall presentation, appreciating the attention to detail and authenticity.
Neutral: The seller, @FrankFig, answered a variety of questions regarding the car's condition. He confirmed that the tires are from 2010 and suggested a replacement due to their age, despite their remaining tread. There was a discussion about the air conditioning, where @Prowler02 clarified that it isn't currently blowing cold, and @imajali suggested ways to diagnose potential leaks, showing a proactive approach to vehicle maintenance.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the car's condition. @DCO1961 inquired about the tires and any issues with driving the car a long distance, while @imajali noticed oil around the oil pan, indicating potential leaks. @timohb asked about the smog certificate, hinting at worries over compliance with local regulations. The overall conversation indicates some uncertainty about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the air conditioning and any possible oil leaks.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @LLynn describes the vehicle as strikingly pretty and notes that it includes many original accessories that are often missing from other listings, expressing a desire to own the car. @Route.US.66 highlights the authenticity of the car’s European design features, asserting that it retains the original style meant by Enzo Ferrari, making it desirable.
Neutral: @CMScollection (The Seller) provides an update on the vehicle, mentioning that prior services have been completed and that the car has mostly been displayed in showroom condition. Several commentors like @Chase68 and @HerveMouly pose questions regarding specific features and registration details, indicating a general curiosity about the vehicle's background and specifications.
Negative: @cptkirk1972 and @Hulk2000 raise concerns about the condition of the car, noting inconsistencies between the claimed mileage and the wear on the interior, as well as mechanical issues such as oil leaks and malfunctioning air conditioning. @joepags and @GDogg question the overall reliability and condition of the vehicle, with specific concerns about the console and missing components, suggesting a lack of trust in the seller's claims.
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Cecilio (The Seller) presents the 1994 Land Rover Defender 90 NAS as a well-maintained and iconic vehicle that embodies Land Rover history. Many commenters express their admiration for the truck's appearance, with @cbdunn1980 calling it a "great looking rig" and @cbdunn1980 also appreciating the seller's responsiveness in providing detailed information and photos as requested. The seller highlights the vehicle's unique features, including its original 3.9L V8 engine and factory roll cage, attracting interest from potential buyers looking for a reliable and stylish classic 4x4 suitable for various uses.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about specific features and modifications of the Defender. @JJTallan asks if the rear roll cage is removable, while @bobcat110 and @LeosKeys have questions regarding the installation of a hard top and the presence of a soft top, respectively. Throughout the discussion, the seller responds clearly, clarifying that the hard top will be installed before shipping and that there is no soft top included, only the factory hardtop.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the vehicle's features, particularly the absence of air conditioning. @NoGaBiker questions whether AC was a standard feature and inquires about the status of the air conditioning system, to which Cecilio (The Seller) confirms that this model does not come with an AC unit and would require starting from scratch to install one. Additionally, @mudruts dismisses the importance of AC in a soft-top vehicle, indicating a split opinion on this feature. Furthermore, @loonlake72 expresses confusion regarding the spare wheel, indicating that not all images correspond to the current state of the vehicle.
|
|