Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz praised the Ford GT, calling it a "fabulous" and "exquisite example," highlighting its cool factor. @ChadGee remarked on the car's beauty and found the license plate amusing. @ITTIMEFORBED also found the license plate hilarious, expressing gratitude to @FantasyJunction for the chance to view the car. @FantasyJunction, the seller, described the Ford GT Carbon Series as an amazing car with unbelievable performance and stunning design, elaborating on its additional $70k lightweight Carbon Series package and impeccable condition after recent service.
Neutral: @FantasyJunction elaborated on the humorous license plate, "subtlflex," emphasizing its aesthetic connection to the car's silver stripe. They provided further details about the car's background, including its construction by Multimatic and its limited production numbers, with only 250 made each year and only 50 being the Carbon Series. The vehicle boasts numerous high-end options totaling $91,000 and has been meticulously maintained by its current owner, underscoring its overall quality and desirability.
Negative: @Boostwagon questioned the subtle nature of the Ford GT, while @JTBWS and @SchmittyCO commented on the blurred speedometer during the drive, with @SchmittyCO expressing disappointment. @RevSome pointed out that despite the engagement in the comments, there were only two bids on the vehicle in a week, raising concerns about the auction's activity around such a highly regarded car.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: This Ferrari F430 Spider has received a wave of enthusiastic praise from commenters who are enamored by its stunning design and low mileage. @boaboyoz described it as 'a very tasty Texan F430' and highlighted its exquisite Rosso Scuderia color, indicating it could fetch a high price due to its 6-speed manual transmission. @Noahyjohn and @Trust-in-the-Machine shared excitement about its rarity and aesthetic appeal, with the latter noting that it might be one of their all-time favorite Ferraris. The seller, @EliteATX, has also been commended for the high-quality presentation of the vehicle, further enhancing its allure to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the technical aspects of the vehicle, with inquiries about the OEM exhaust headers and whether the car includes factory features or modifications. @rubydaddio asked about the transmission's authenticity, while other users like @mike_747 requested close-up photos of the convertible top to better assess its condition. Additionally, the seller provided clarifications regarding the paint condition and included paint meter readings to confirm originality, addressing comments from users such as @turbotroy and @131MC, thus maintaining an informative dialogue with interested bidders.
Negative: While the comments were largely positive, there were a few critiques and suggestions for improvement. @onedaysomeday pointed out the delayed presentation of key features like the 6-speed manual, and @azzman mentioned that additional photos could have improved the listing. @Mdkillen expressed a desire to see the car in person, indicating that he was still in the consideration phase. However, @Dontbethatguy dismissed potential doubts about the VIP book associated with the car, ensuring that its authenticity remains credible amidst some skepticism from commenters about the documentation.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, praising its stunning design and performance capabilities. @boaboyoz called the Ferrari SF90 Stradale Assetto Fiorano a 'stupendous' and 'super cool specimen', affirming its great looks. Additionally, @yellowferrari77 highlighted its hyper car performance at a fraction of the price, while @Kishote celebrated the car's value and driving experience, calling it docile yet lightning fast. Many found the vehicle's bold spec, including the factory paint stripes mentioned by @Kishote, to be beautiful and appealing.
Neutral: Comments reflected a mix of perspectives on the vehicle's specifications and its appeal. @Preciseautomotivegroup acknowledged the car's high mileage while wishing the seller well with the sale. @rwarner747 inquired about any open recalls, receiving a prompt and reassuring response from @CarPointautogroup, indicating all services were current. Such inquiries show potential buyers are assessing the car's condition and value in a practical manner, balancing excitement with caution.
Negative: There were some critiques regarding the visual elements of the vehicle, primarily about the styling. @gtaylorwill expressed a lack of enthusiasm for the stripes on the model, questioning whether they were vinyl or paint. Similarly, @porsche1986 pointed out that while the car is beautiful, it suffers from high mileage concerns. Such comments highlight that not all viewers were entirely convinced of the car's desirability, particularly regarding its aesthetic choices and usage history.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle for its stunning aesthetics and exceptional performance. @Halvo noted that it is an amazing stock SC, while @PDXBryan expressed that the car checks all the boxes and rings all the bells, particularly highlighting the fantastic interior. Additionally, @vonmec echoed enthusiasm for its driving capability, stating that it corners like a go-kart and pulls like a locomotive, promising joy for the future owner. The @the_patina_group highlighted the car's unique character as a 'factory freak' in terms of performance, noting its very good mechanical condition and dynamic paint finish.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on specific details regarding the vehicle. @Stuttgarthoosier, for instance, inquired about the suspension's status and pointed out a possible height imbalance, to which @the_patina_group responded that the perceived difference was merely an optical illusion from the parking angle. @Euro928S raised a question about the installation of a PCCM unit and its components, while @WHA22 asked about the vehicle's compliance with emissions regulations, receiving helpful responses from @the_patina_group. These interactions reflect an engaged discussion among potential buyers.
Negative: A few comments revealed concerns or misunderstandings regarding the vehicle's modifications and overall condition. @Halvo questioned the clarity about the replacement engine mentioned by @the_patina_group, suggesting confusion over the details in the listing. Similarly, @Tdr78 commented on the mismatch of tires and seatbelt functionality, indicating a need for assurance on these points. Finally, comment flagged as non-constructive by others highlights that there are elements of dissatisfaction or skepticism among some community members regarding the vehicle.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @2002WS6 described the vehicle as a neat old truck, while @RazorbackRagdoll praised its beautiful exterior color and elegant white bench seat with red piping. @DRIVEGUY found it to be a nice little unmolested truck, and @bdph52z deemed it just perfect. @VBAutosport, the seller, highlighted the truck's special qualities in a walkthrough video and assured potential buyers that all gauges work and everything runs smoothly.
Neutral: @broodie and @weim55 discussed the truck's engine, noting that the original 216 engine might have been upgraded to a more durable 235 ci engine from the late '50s or early '60s. The conversation included references to how the 1952 model was significant for its features like vent windows and push-button doors. @VBAutosport clarified that the dent noted by @Spartelm is clearly visible, but they maintained that there is no rust or major paint damage, preparing buyers for realistic expectations.
Negative: @Spartelm criticized some aspects of the truck, pointing out visible dents and scratches, and claimed there might be rust along the hood's edge. @mike_rockwell and @PJHenderson raised concerns about the operability of the truck's gears and wipers, highlighting potential mechanical issues. @67COOP also remarked that it would have been beneficial to show the wipers working in the driving video, indicating a desire for more thorough transparency in the vehicle's operational state.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @FinestVehiclesTraded provides an enthusiastic introduction to the auction of a rare 2007 Ducati 999S Team USA Edition, emphasizing its collector-grade qualities and the meticulous care it has received. The bike's limited availability, with only 150 units made, adds to its allure for potential bidders. The seller assures prospects of its excellent condition, having been serviced thoroughly, and invites them to view or inspect the motorcycle at their facility, which is seen as a plus for transparency and trust.
Neutral: There are various inquiries and comments from prospective buyers, including @qubdent63 asking for service details and @Dheffel1 requesting functional demonstrations of the bike’s lights. @Caracalla raises a technical question regarding a stalling issue that has been reported in this model, while @RabeahBeydoun inquires if original keys and memorabilia are included. The seller promptly responds to these queries, indicating a willingness to engage and provide information, which keeps the prospective buyers informed and engaged.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised regarding specific issues and features of the bike. @Caracalla expresses worries about the known low-speed stalling issue associated with this model, suggesting that it may not have been adequately addressed. In contrast, @Surffly contests this claim, sharing personal experience of owning similar bikes without encountering such problems. Additionally, the bike only includes the black key, which may disappoint some collectors expecting both keys or full original memorabilia, as noted by @RabeahBeydoun.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @payton_jpn praised the vehicle as a beautiful car with great modifications, noting its rarity as a slick top with all factory options and low miles. @DivergentMotor (The Seller) echoed this sentiment, expressing agreement about the difficulty of finding such a well-equipped vehicle in this condition. Furthermore, @DivergentMotor confirmed that the car has been well-kept, having been garaged most of its life, and highlighted the significant investment made in upgrades, with close to $20k spent, including over $11k on parts alone.
Neutral: Several commenters asked about the vehicle's modifications and performance details, showcasing an active interest in its specifications. @hyperion917 inquired about dyno tuning and emissions compliance, while @Gsupra93 asked about dyno sheets and the specifics of the downpipe. @DivergentMotor provided clarification on these points, confirming that the car has been conservatively tuned by a reputable professional and that the downpipe is indeed compliant with emissions regulations, promising to upload relevant documentation soon.
Negative: @Brian_Oconners raised a concern about the low mileage owned before sale, questioning the reason behind only 1k miles of ownership. @DivergentMotor explained that the seller is preparing to open a dealership and this vehicle is part of his inventory, addressing the concern but indicating a potentially less favorable situation regarding the car's sale history. Additionally, other commenters like @carjunkie79 and @binaryfyre requested videos of the vehicle running and driving, suggesting a desire for more transparency and visibility about its condition.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @dzguy reminisces fondly about the teal color of the vehicle, expressing a genuine liking for it and wishing good luck to the seller. Many commenters, like @ExcelloM1 and @9literviper, echo this sentiment, with @9literviper noting the rarity of the turquoise metallic finish and highlighting its stunning appearance paired with saddle seats. @Bongiovi and @Powrmonger both emphasize the beauty of the color combination, with @Bongiovi suggesting that the photos do not do the vehicle justice. Overall, there is considerable appreciation for the unique and striking color of the vehicle, with users like @RichardPetty expressing a desire to both collect and drive it.
Neutral: Several comments reflect on the status of the vehicle in terms of its mileage and historical significance. @Bmarcum and @C4geek point out the rarity of low-mileage models, with @C4geek providing a more skeptical view on the future value of such vehicles, indicating that the market for collector cars may not be as deep as hoped. @OCEquestrian and @Oldwood share observations about the importance of the C4 ZR-1 from an engineering perspective, while others note the challenges these models face in the collector market. Commenters like @Siowner and @CorvetteGuru discuss the potential drawbacks of such low mileage, including concerns about the vehicle's condition and necessary maintenance from long periods of inactivity.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle primarily center around its low mileage, with several comments suggesting that keeping it unused for so long may lead to issues. @Bmarcum mentions oil on the pan that should be addressed, and @Oldwood critiques the general popularity of such a car compared to more recognizable models, suggesting that many buyers may overlook the C4 ZR-1. @CorvetteGuru discusses the risks of needing to replace aging rubber components due to the vehicle's limited use, speaking to the potential hidden costs of maintenance for an older car. In a more critical tone, @joesal67 laments the modifications made to the vehicle, arguing that it should have remained untouched to preserve its original integrity.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Tdsmitty1 (The Seller) provided detailed and reassuring responses to potential buyers' inquiries, indicating a high level of transparency regarding the vehicle's history and condition. He clarified the confusion surrounding the number of previous owners, emphasizing that the report had an error. He also confirmed that the car has been well maintained, stating that with only 21k miles, it operates like a 'new' car and that its top mechanism and suspension system are in good shape, which should delight the next owner.
Neutral: Several comments asked practical questions about the car, like @Along4theRide’s inquiry about the California smog certificate, which @Tdsmitty1 addressed positively by confirming it will be provided. @DeepSpace raised concerns about a small dent and the absence of original rims, to which @Tdsmitty1 responded that he has not investigated the repair cost but believes it is minor. These exchanges indicate that potential buyers are keen on ensuring the vehicle meets their standards and requirements before making a purchase.
Negative: Comments such as @DG78's question about the multitude of owners for a relatively low mileage vehicle point to concerns about the car's history and trustworthiness. There is also underlying skepticism reflected in @Jonesy66's mention of potential 'SL fatigue' among buyers, suggesting that repeated listings could create doubt about the car's value or desirability. Additionally, @br442's inquiries about the suspension and top mechanism highlight common issues with such vehicles, revealing a cautious attitude among potential buyers.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commentators praised the car's beautiful configuration, with @Uroscott highlighting the appealing four-speed and maroon paint, recalling fond memories associated with a similar model. @Rpharesjr expressed excitement over the car's modified features, suggesting that it would be a fun drive regardless of further changes. @Studedude, reminiscing from the '60s, noted the classic design's timeless appeal, while @davek1661 felt the vehicle was in great shape as it stood, appreciating its potential as a nice driver. Overall, the car has garnered enthusiasm for its vintage charm and enjoyable driving experience.
Neutral: Comments varied on the topic of the vehicle's specifications, particularly concerning the wheel covers. @66Malibu and @CarFoolLane acknowledged the distinction between the wheel covers and actual wheels, with CarFoolLane pointing out a potential for confusion among less informed bidders. The seller, @OnlyLaSalle, provided detailed insights about the car's history, maintenance, and areas of potential improvement, noting their own experience with similar vehicles. Discussion about modifications, like potential engine swaps or restorations, sparked interest among commentators, including suggestions for performance upgrades on the six-cylinder engine.
Negative: Some participants raised concerns about details regarding the car's condition. @piffs5 questioned the presence of rust, while @EpicMC inquired about the paint job's quality and whether a fan shroud was originally included—a point clarified by the seller in subsequent replies. @Rpharesjr and others debated the desirability of engine modifications, with implications that transitioning to a V8 might eliminate some of the current car's charm. Additionally, some participants expressed disappointment that the car was not equipped with a V8, referring to it as just shy of the 'holy grail' of Falcons.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have expressed their admiration for the 2012 Porsche Cayenne Turbo, highlighting its stunning design and specifications. @campodf describes it as a 'fabulous car' and praises its wonderful representation. @Dixiesdad echoes this sentiment, indicating that the colors are beautiful and expressing confidence about the vehicle's success in the market. @motts911targa and @Espanolie both note its appealing color and impressive options, with the latter expressing belief that its low mileage will contribute to a favorable sale. The seller, @1600veloce, emphasizes their commitment to quality and detail, showcasing their extensive experience with over 1,900 vehicle listings, which adds credibility to the offering.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the detailed responsiveness of @1600veloce regarding inquiries about the vehicle's condition and history. For instance, @Stdenis25 asks about potential leather issues, and the seller acknowledges some common shrinkage observed in the dash material. Similarly, @jcc0016 inquires about maintenance issues, to which @1600veloce provides a thorough history of repairs, clarifying that many components have been addressed at authorized dealerships. Commenters like @7and8s highlight the vehicle’s good condition, noting the cleanliness of the undercarriage, and seek more clarification on the vehicle's maintenance records, demonstrating an active interest in ensuring the Cayenne's reliability.
Negative: While most comments are positive, some do raise concerns. @Stdenis25 questions whether the leather dash is starting to separate, a concern commonly associated with this model. Additionally, @4whldrft inquiries about the condition of the rear disks, expressing uncertainty about whether they show cracks or are merely covered in dust from the parking brake. @greenway shares a negative perspective on the newer Cayenne models, asserting that the second generation, especially the one they own, possesses superior materials and performance, suggesting that the quality has diminished in newer models. Such comments reflect a mixed perspective on the overall offerings of the Cayenne lineup.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning appearance and restoration quality. Commentors @Themcclintock and @Collins4A described it as a "great look" and a "beauty", while @Mrs_Wane emphasized that it is a "beautiful truck". @BigD36ford praised the investment potential, while @Anton2024 acknowledged the efforts of those restoring classic trucks. Overall, the comments convey excitement and positive sentiments toward the truck's aesthetics, construction, and value in the collector market.
Neutral: Some commentors provided neutral observations regarding the truck's auction progress and restoration history. @twisted_lincoln, the seller, thanked participants for their positive comments and provided details about the truck's restoration process. Others, like @BJHitson60, inquired about pre-restoration photos, demonstrating an interest in the truck's history. Additionally, commentors like @Diesel2022 asked questions about the vehicle, providing a more informational perspective rather than purely emotional responses.
Negative: A few comments touched on minor critiques or concerns regarding the truck. @Expresswasher pointed out that the vehicle could use a chrome drip edge, suggesting that improvements could be made. @H2R raised questions about the truck's suitability for specific tasks, inquiring whether it would need upgraded front springs for a plow, which hints at practical considerations for usability. Overall, these comments reflect the sentiment that while the truck is impressive, there are areas for consideration regarding its functionality.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlighted the car's beauty and appeal. @Tcaputo described it as a beautiful car, while @Glenn930 noted its low mileage and aesthetics. The model's features were praised, with @Yags referring to it as a fully loaded Grand Sport garage queen in the best color combination. @trucks1234 (The Seller) emphasized that it topped their previous Corvette experiences, highlighting its perfect look and driving performance. @maroonedd also shared admiration, calling it absolutely beautiful, and @Pmusgerg expressed enjoyment from having a similar model, wishing well to the seller.
Neutral: Several commenters sought further information regarding the vehicle's history and functionality after years of sitting idle. They raised concerns about the implications of the Pennsylvania emissions testing exemption, as noted by the car's testing history since 2012. Questions about the existence of potential issues with a C6 Corvette left unused for an extended period were brought up, with members asking for insights from others familiar with such vehicles. The rarity of the 4LT option was also discussed, with @tmgillum inquiring about the installation of fender decals and the availability of keyless remotes, suggesting a common interest in the vehicle's specifications.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism surrounding the vehicle's prolonged disuse, with @Glenn930 expressing concern about possible issues from not being operated for many years. @tmgillum noted the potential rarity of the 4LT pack, posing questions about what might have happened to the car's original decals and whether important accessories like keyless remotes were included. The uncertainty surrounding the car's maintenance and operational state after years of inactivity prompted caution among potential buyers, implying that the vehicle might not be as flawless as it appeared.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments about this 2016 Range Rover Sport Supercharged Dynamic highlight its aesthetic appeal and performance. @MW4CarMan referred to it as a 'badass looking vehicle' and others noted the unique color combination of Aintree Green with a silver roof, which many found striking. The seller emphasizes the vehicle's excellent condition, mentioning that it is a one-owner SUV with no accidents and has been meticulously maintained, which adds to its desirability.
Neutral: Several comments focus on logistical details and inquiries regarding the vehicle. @baa918 raised a question about whether there was only one key fob, to which the seller responded affirmatively while promising to double-check. This indicates that potential buyers are showing interest in the vehicle's specifications and features, which is typical in this context.
Negative: There were no outright negative comments about the vehicle; however, the inquiry from @baa918 regarding the number of key fobs could hint at concerns about the completeness of the sale. Overall, the feedback remains largely positive with no major criticisms surrounding functionality or condition.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed positive sentiments about the truck's build and features. @SnoDawg remarked that it looks like a solid build with the potential to be a great driver or wheeler, especially noting the practical aluminum tub for East Coast conditions. @SupraFreak praised the truck's great appearance and mentioned the nice upgrades, highlighting that the color is a favorite. @Rustybumper shared a personal experience with an Aqualu tub on a similar vehicle, indicating satisfaction with its durability and performance.
Neutral: Comments about the truck included some technical and design inquiries. @rmoudry wondered about the images showing what appeared to be dirt or stains, seeking clarification on the materials used. @SL8R raised a question about possible fitment issues with the hood after looking at a specific photo, while @NatlChamp asked if the vehicle had a hardtop, with @edrumwri (The Seller) confirming it does not. Commenters like @ejwil and @mattluckhurst inquired about the functionality of seatbelts, showing an interest in safety features.
Negative: The truck did receive some criticism and concerns from various commenters. @Berend15 pointed out a possible hood/apron issue on the driver's side, hinting at a design flaw. @tigercat1000 observed that the oil pressure gauge seemed inoperative in the cold start video, which could indicate a potential mechanical problem. Furthermore, some commenters like @wngrog and @rmoudry expressed confusion over the function of the ignition cutoff switch and the roll cage affecting window operation, questioning the practicality of these features.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @RevISK commented positively about the vehicle, stating it has "Awesome stripes," which suggests that the visual appeal of the car stands out and has garnered attention.
Neutral: @SurfPunk expressed interest in viewing the vehicle in person and inquired about its location, stating, "Where in PA? I’d like to come take in person if possible." This question indicates a serious buyer who values inspection before making a decision. @Dannyboy175 (The Seller) responded, providing his location in York, PA, and expressed openness to coordinating a visit for potential bidders. Additionally, @SurfPunk noted he sent private messages to the seller and received confirmations, reflecting his proactive engagement in the purchasing process.
Negative: @Dannyboy175 (The Seller) also acknowledged some confusion about the private messages, stating, "I can’t seem to find where the private messages. I’m working on figuring this out," which highlights a communication issue that might create frustration for potential buyers. @SurfPunk reiterated the importance of digital communication, mentioning that he had sent two private messages and encouraged the seller to check his email for confirmation, labeling himself as an "aging analog dinosaur living in a digital world," which conveys a humorous yet critical view of the seller's tech-savviness.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong enthusiasm for Suzie Q, with multiple users expressing delight in the vehicle’s driving experience. @Rathertakearide mentioned how light and playful the Cayman S is, noting that even friends were impressed and thought it resembled a more expensive car. @JFoglia praised the seller's responsiveness and emphasized the importance of keeping discussions positive, mentioning that the car in question could foster community instead of negativity. Overall, the atmosphere surrounding the auction for this beautiful Porsche is light-hearted and engaging, with the seller actively promoting Suzie Q’s features and charm.
Neutral: There are practical inquiries and observations regarding the car’s condition and maintenance history, reflecting a desire for transparency. @TJP512 asked for confirmation on the front facia’s paint condition and the seller confirmed a repaint on the bumper cover, indicating responsiveness. Questions about mileage and oil analysis were raised by @ats661 and @Tspringer, with the seller providing relevant updates in a timely manner. General queries about specific features like the driver's seat and alternator history were also posed, showing potential buyers are interested in knowing every detail before making a bid.
Negative: Some comments indicate skepticism about the car’s mechanical state, specifically regarding potential issues like bore scoring and IMS bearing concerns. @epaster and @TJP512 brought up these points, suggesting a need for further clarification on possible defects. @JFoglia countered claims about bore scoring frequency but acknowledged the concern, indicating mixed feelings within the community about the car’s reliability. This variation in opinions among users highlights the importance of careful consideration and research when evaluating classic vehicles like Suzie Q.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, expressing excitement about the Chevy COPO 572's performance and its unique status as the last one built. @RandD commented on his surprise and admiration for the car, while @Bowtienut provided insights on its impressive quarter-mile capabilities. The car is noted for its high horsepower, with @restoreamusclecar revealing it houses a powerful 720hp engine. Multiple users indicated the potential investment value of owning such a rare vehicle, emphasizing its as-new condition and significance within the automotive landscape, which could make it desirable for collectors.
Neutral: Some participants sought clarification on its legality and usability. @mlee129 noted that the COPO does not come with a VIN or title, confirming it cannot be driven on public roads. @Gitrdone elaborated on potential workarounds for registration, while @RamblinMan shared a story about a car that was registered for street use under specific conditions. The dialogue also touched on its presentation at automotive events, as @cjstow1 inquired about its initial MSRP and any history of use, confirming that the car had only been driven a short distance for show purposes.
Negative: However, there were concerns about making the car street legal, with several comments highlighting that the car is specifically designed for races and not practical for everyday driving. @essrt8 and others pointed out that attempts to modify it for street use could be futile due to various mechanical limitations, such as the engine overheating and the absence of essential features like mirrors. @honda1 cautioned against making it street legal, emphasizing that future owners should appreciate the car's design and function as intended, rather than trying to adapt it to street conditions.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the charm and aesthetic appeal of the 1960 Austin-Healey Bugeye Sprite. @TKC_MN, the seller, emphasizes its vibrant red exterior and matching interior, claiming it embodies vintage British fun. Commentors like @jerichomtn and @Don3868 praise its excellent condition and beautiful appearance, with @jerichomtn calling it a classic and @Don3868 appreciating its cute design. Overall, there is a consensus that the Bugeye Sprite is visually appealing and likely to draw positive attention on the road, with @Capt._Doug mentioning the numerous thumbs-up and waves it will garner during drives. Moreover, participants discuss its upgrades, such as a performance cam and headers, which enhance the driving experience without sacrificing the car's original character.
Neutral: Several comments focus on technical aspects and the history of the Bugeye Sprite. @Grumpy226 asks about its grounding, to which @TKC_MN promptly responds with details. Commenters delve into more technical discussions, such as @HealeyRick mentioning a common issue with the choke not staying out and others discussing various modifications that could enhance the vehicle's performance or comfort. There are also comments regarding maintenance, with @MNberg explaining that Bugeye Sprites represent a good entry point into classic car ownership due to their affordability and ease of maintenance. The vehicle's potential as a racing car is also discussed, suggesting a vibrant community of enthusiasts and supporters for this model.
Negative: Some negative comments raise concerns about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding rust issues. @Jmiko and @racerxisme point out potential rust problems in the floor pans and rocker panels, casting doubt on the vehicle's overall integrity. @carmann1313 mentions a first-gear noise that could indicate a mechanical problem. Although @TKC_MN attempts to address these concerns by offering additional pictures and inspections, @Jmiko expresses dissatisfaction with the visibility of the rust areas. This ongoing dialogue hints at the complexity involved in buying and maintaining a vintage car, as prospective buyers weigh aesthetic and performance appeal against potential hidden repair costs.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed strong admiration for the Camaro, highlighting its originality and quality. @boaboyoz exclaimed that the car is 'gold,' emphasizing its beautiful build and remarking on its legendary seller. @LarryM noted the correct placement of the nose stripe as a sign of quality, while @funkaholik praised the original paint and interior. @ssterry shared a nostalgic view of the unique gold color as a classic 60s hue that stands out. Both @JimmoVette and @BimmerVertDudeFTW celebrated the aesthetics and OEM quality of the vehicle, with the latter stating that they wouldn't mind minor imperfections due to the car's overall glory.
Neutral: Some comments addressed specific details about the Camaro without expressing strong positive or negative views. @ebkelsey160 pointed out that the rear view mirrors aren't original but still look appealing. Discussions about the engine revealed that while the original 327 engine had been replaced with a 350, @BimmerVertDudeFTW and @JimmoVette noted this could be an opportunity for future upgrades. @FlyingMuleRider questioned the operational status of the vacuum system for the headlights, while @SMSC1 requested clarification on paint details, maintaining an objective tone.
Negative: A few commenters raised concerns or critiques about the Camaro. @fmjcraig mentioned the absence of power brakes or steering, suggesting that the car's original owner may have had budget constraints. There were also inquiries regarding the extent of repainting the car had undergone, as @capricemental highlighted potential questions about its originality. @FlyingMuleRider expressed doubts about the lower door jams and suspected rust, although this concern was addressed by the seller who affirmed the metal's solid condition.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BikerWilly expressed high admiration for the vehicle, stating it is one of the finest early cars he has ever driven, noting its flawless operation and smooth handling. He emphasized that the car deserves recognition, claiming it ranks among the top choices for early automobiles, and if he had the resources, he would jump at the opportunity to own one. @MichaelsMotorCarsPA (The Seller) also highlighted its ease of operation and how surprisingly quick it is in second gear, appreciating the positive feedback from the community about this exceptional brass era car.
Neutral: @Sparrownaut noted the Maxwell-Briscoes are among the most drivable Brass Era vehicles, suggesting they are reliable and simple enough for modern motorists to operate with minimal instruction. The mention of the car's wicker seat was also discussed, indicating it may have undergone repairs or modifications throughout its long history, potentially enhancing its charm. Additionally, @RogueG and @Rick_Mopar1 engaged in dialogue regarding the presence of optional features such as the windscreen and headlights, clarifying the vehicle's design choices instead of regarding them as omissions.
Negative: @Rick_Mopar1 pointed out the lack of a windscreen and lights, which could be construed as concerning for potential buyers. This comment touched on the vehicle's incompleteness despite its aesthetic appeal. @BikerWilly recounted Maxwell's historical downsides, describing a notorious period when the brand suffered due to poor engineering decisions, which negatively affected its reputation. Still, he ultimately expressed that this particular model defied those past issues, indicating a nuanced perspective on the vehicle's legacy.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Meccanica highlights the vehicle as the ideal spec for interstate travel, suggesting it has high utility for long distances. @TimmyToledo refers to it as a nice rig, indicating an overall favorable opinion despite some critiques about the brand's focus. @vanmods shares personal experience with a similar vehicle, mentioning its impressive handling and good fuel efficiency, which adds a positive perspective on the updated drivetrain.
Neutral: @Dake inquires if this vehicle is the first 2026 model on Bringatrailer, which does not convey a strong opinion either way. @Shaneinthemountains raises a practical question about the design of the bed and its functionality, hinting at usability concerns without outright negativity. @Colonial-RV (The Seller) responds to the bed question, clarifying its design without offering overly promotional language, presenting the information factually.
Negative: @mbz2000 expresses disappointment regarding the vehicle’s driving experience, mentioning poor gas mileage and noise levels, while acknowledging its visual appeal. @JustaGlitch criticizes the lack of attention to detail in the vehicle’s presentation for its listing price, implying signs of desperation. @Pauleynj and @d.seiden both comment on the engine bay, suggesting it looks dirty and old, raising concerns about the vehicle's condition. @RBeck2008 proposes a more cost-effective alternative, showing skepticism towards the vehicle’s value.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments highlighting its impressive design and build quality. Commenters like @rcavictor praised it as a well-thought-out project, while @t984spd expressed admiration for the truck and shared their own building experience, indicating a strong appreciation for classic vehicles. Additionally, @Lov2Golf acknowledged the beautiful work done, and @tlcamg encouraged bidders to consider purchasing the truck, thereby generating a positive atmosphere around the vehicle's sale.
Neutral: There has been some discussion around the vehicle's features, particularly regarding the air conditioning unit. While @bgill964 noted an apparent discrepancy about the AC compressor seen in earlier photographs, @MTM52 (The Seller) clarified that there had never been a compressor installed. This exchange highlights an informational aspect of the comments, showcasing potential buyers' curiosity about additional modifications they might want to make.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns or regrets related to the vehicle. For instance, @MTM52 (The Seller) expressed regret for selling the truck two years ago, showing an emotional attachment to the vehicle. Additionally, the lack of air conditioning seems to be a subject of disappointment for some potential buyers, such as @MiamiVice33, who specifically inquired about it.
![]() |
20-Years-Owned 1995 Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet 6-Speed
WP0CA2992SS340698
Lot 194283
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Lightride expressed appreciation for the vehicle being thoroughly enjoyed, sharing their experience with a similar 993. They noted the importance of checking the valve guides and suspension updates due to its mileage, highlighting how improvements transformed their own car. @Espanolie complimented the car's color, likening it to Arena Red, and praised its impressive factory options, mentioning how well it presents despite having 136k miles, which showcases the durability and beloved nature of the 993 series.
Neutral: @Paul_56 (The Seller) provided insights into the vehicle's background, confirming that major engine work was performed in 2012 and mentioned ongoing maintenance, including smog checks. They engaged with comments about the tires, clarifying that any noise at speed comes from the Toyo Proxies, which are noted for their grip. @CastellanMC pointed out a market observation regarding the higher value of closed 993 models compared to cabriolets, which @Paul_56 confirmed.
Negative: @badger707 inquired about the car's smog status, indicating a potential concern for buyers. While the comments did not heavily feature negative sentiments, the need for clarity on smog checks suggests some uncertainty around regulatory compliance. Additionally, @Extratx warned potential buyers about noise from the tires, which could be confused with mechanical issues, implying the need for careful examination upon purchase.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @FalconFlyer expressed admiration for the Jeep, commenting on its beautiful design and color combination, hinting at the possibility of upgrading from an older model. @Jeepmike praised the vehicle's excellent condition, noting its low mileage and speculating about its value reaching $20k. @gdspc remarked on its attractive appearance, stating that they have seen the Jeep driving around and wish it luck in the auction.
Neutral: @GeoguyBri raised a question regarding the air conditioning feature, mentioning a discrepancy in the listing, while also inquiring about the fuel injection kit. @jimjim noted the absence of details regarding the soft top in the listing but appreciated the vehicle's overall appeal. The seller @Jsilco responded to these inquiries, confirming details about the soft top and offering additional information about the vehicle's condition and history.
Negative: @Mychordistooshort criticized @Jeepmike for making unhelpful predictions about the selling price. @apester4u asked about the condition and maintenance records, indicating a concern over the vehicle's care. There were also comments about minor rust near the front bumper, with @Mychordistooshort pointing out that such corrosion is typical in older models but not significant.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg praised the Steel Gray color, stating it looks exceptionally well on the E350 4MATIC. @VantageAuto (The Seller) emphasized the car's quality, noting it as the best example due to its ultra-low mileage, AMG sport package, and always being garage-kept. The interior was described as beautiful and free from smoke or odors, with @VantageAuto also highlighting the impressive power and efficiency of the car's motor, stating it can achieve close to 30mpg on the highway.
Neutral: @z3velocity raised a question about the platform in the trunk, which @Eric_Savage explained as a slide-out drawer for storage, praising its utility. @Archie0731 commented on the auction, indicating a lack of bids, but @VantageAuto assured that this vehicle's condition and features would attract interest. Overall, there's a general curiosity about specific details and features of the vehicle from various commenters.
Negative: @mm07 inquired about potential odors, including whether it was a smoker's car, to which @VantageAuto confirmed there were none. @77fleetwood pointed out an issue with the wood trim's quality, mentioning it tends to fade over time, though it does not affect driving. @t44tq highlighted a need for a headliner repair, which @VantageAuto acknowledged, offering a solution, while @adnan999 shared concerns about the headliner detaching, suggesting it could be a common issue in Florida due to climate.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @stepner praises the Jeep Grand Wagoneer for its beauty and mentions that there have been many gorgeous vehicles posted recently. User @letthegypsyhaveit fondly recalls memories associated with the vehicle, calling it a "Sweet Waggie." Additionally, @doaclnr (The Seller) informs potential buyers that the vehicle has been garage-kept since 2020, suggesting it has been well-maintained and preserved.
Neutral: Comments such as @BEK_Boston's note the vehicle appears to be in nice shape but query the choice of blue trim, asking whether it is painted or a wrap. @doaclnr (The Seller) clarifies that the blue is paint and not a wrap. User @idtiveold2022 poses questions about the vehicle's air conditioning and functionality of the gauges, seeking reassurance about its operational state, which @doaclnr (The Seller) affirms by stating the AC has been charged annually and all systems function properly.
Negative: Some concerns arise from users like @idtiveold2022, who note the importance of a functioning a/c in Texas and inquire about potential costly repairs. @jtommoore raises a practical question regarding the front differential and its operation, hinting at a possible issue with the vehicle's 4WD system. While @doaclnr (The Seller) provides reassurance about the AC and vehicle functions, there remains an underlying tension with users questioning the specifics of the vehicle's systems.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments praise the vehicle's excellent mechanical condition and extensive upgrades. @Daitken5 highlights a substantial $27k engine refresh and over $8k in additional enhancements, including a premium sound system, custom steering wheel, and upgraded lighting features. Enthusiasts like @GDogg and @WFS express admiration for the car's aesthetics and distinctive features, suggesting it stands out in its class and is a compelling investment opportunity.
Neutral: The discussion includes questions from potential buyers seeking specific technical details, demonstrating a general interest in the car's features and maintenance history. For instance, @DavidMarlow inquires about Bluetooth compatibility, and @Ewu57 questions the engine's IMS status. @Daitken5 effectively addresses these inquiries, providing reassurance about the vehicle's condition and features.
Negative: There are some minor concerns regarding the vehicle, particularly the lack of information on IMS replacement during the engine out service, which @Ewu57 brings up. While the responses from @Daitken5 seek to clarify and alleviate these worries, the question indicates there may be apprehension among potential buyers regarding engine reliability. Overall, the comments reflect a healthy balance of interest and scrutiny typical in vehicles of this caliber.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the truck's excellent condition, noting it has been well cared for and presents as much lower mileage than it actually has. @stevenbrooten specifically appreciates its unique color and points out the quality of its maintenance over the years. The seller mentions routine upkeep, including replacing tires and servicing, which has left it in outstanding driving condition and nearly free of mechanical issues, garnering excitement about its availability in the market.
Neutral: Several comments engage with the truck's details and service history, as @jorjor inquires about specifics such as the bumper alignment, steering performance, and air conditioning functionality. The seller responsibly addresses these queries, confirming that while there is some play in the steering, the truck tracks straight and has had recent upgrades to the brakes and suspension. This exchange reflects a sense of ongoing dialogue about the vehicle's features and history, with @jorjor expressing gratitude for the seller's comprehensive responses.
Negative: While the overall sentiment is favorable, one comment by @jorjor raises concerns about the potential for play in the steering and noted irregularities with the bumper's alignment. There are concerns about whether the oversized tires contribute to any steering issues, suggesting that potential buyers should be mindful of these details when considering the vehicle. Despite these points, the seller attempts to alleviate worries by providing clarifications on these aspects.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Eric_T mentioned that the photos of the vehicle are fabulous, which was echoed by @Italia_227 who noted that the pictures were truly exceptional, highlighting the presence of real sand on the floormats. @kvanduinen enthusiastically stated "WOW!!!! stunning... amazing photos and awesome buggy!" and @CaptJ1m referred to the buggy as potentially the nicest Manx he had ever seen, expressing his admiration for its appearance. Additionally, @NineNinetyThree993 appreciated the restoration effort, acknowledging the complexity of building a buggy like this and complimenting the job done.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions about specific features and history of the vehicle. @DannyWilde asked whether the title mentions CONV, Manx, or Meyers, while @Fokjoudoos expressed concern regarding the lack of a handbrake, speedometer, or fuel gauge. @Msrice79 provided a practical tip regarding the fuel gauge, suggesting a simple way to check gas levels, while @Valkyrja commented on the impact of good photos on the final price of the auction. @outlandmotors (The Seller) clarified that the buggy is titled as a 1968 Volkswagen Bug and addressed some technical details concerning the engine and restoration status, noting its limited mileage.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters had serious concerns about the vehicle's features. @1959Tom was curious about the absence of a handbrake, which @outlandmotors (The Seller) confirmed did not exist. @RLMarx inquired about the speedometer and fuel gauge issues, noting these had not been addressed during the restoration process, while @Fokjoudoos also expressed frustration over the absence of functional gauges. The seller acknowledged these issues, stating that while the speedometer works intermittently, it was kept as-is for originality's sake, prompting further skepticism from commenters about the vehicle's restoration integrity.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg appreciates the aesthetic appeal of the 325i Cabriolet, noting its good looks and the nice return on the seats. @mikeor is impressed by the vehicle's mileage, sharing that despite being at 216K, it doesn't look like it's over 116K. @JoeVacation (The Seller) highlights the car's perfect driveability, confirming that there are no leaks and minimal oil consumption as it is rarely driven. He also mentions the timing belt was replaced shortly after he purchased the vehicle, assuring potential buyers of its condition.
Neutral: @RichTO questions whether purchasing the car includes all additional items associated with it. @phavriluk raises concerns regarding the car's current driveability and operational status of the engine and transmission, as well as the effectiveness of the infotainment system. @claysclassiccars requests a cold start and driving video for a better understanding of the vehicle's performance. @Kaodo inquires about the timing belt records, not finding that information in the provided invoices.
Negative: @Kaodo emphasizes the importance of having a new timing belt and implies that it should be a priority for any buyer. @Jlhenry expresses frustration over the lack of shipping options, which may deter potential buyers from considering the vehicle due to logistical issues.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Faisons368 noted that the vehicle looks like a great driver, suggesting it has potential for enjoyable performance. @willie2323 expressed satisfaction with the attention given to the rear shock, indicating that it is being well-maintained or upgraded, which adds to the overall good impression of the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: @GBRBiLL pointed out a discrepancy in the write-up regarding the brakes, noting that it states 4-wheel drum brakes, while the accompanying video mentions front disc and rear drum brakes. This points to a need for clarity in the vehicle's specifications, and @Bulletmotorsportsinc acknowledged the error, adding that sellers appreciate engagement from potential buyers during the auction process, which indicates an open line of communication and a willingness to provide assistance.
Negative: @JohnF1966 questioned whether the car has a NCRS top flight award, implying that it may lack certain accolades or recognition that could reflect its value or quality. This raises concerns about the vehicle's credentials and place in collectors' eyes. Additionally, @GBRBiLL mentioned a desire for more specifications on the engine, hinting that potential buyers might feel uninformed about critical details that could influence their purchasing decision.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @gscharnagl reminisces about the vehicle's unique beauty and exceptional color combination, labeling it a rare gem among S350 4MATIC models. @privatebuyer recounts a positive ownership experience, highlighting the car's impressive torque and modern interior condition. @BimmerVertDudeFTW and @dengreene both express admiration for the stunning design, with @BimmerVertDudeFTW specifically praising the color scheme as 'hypnotic' and a 'damn fine sled.'
Neutral: The seller, @Collectibleclassics, provides insights into the car's condition, detailing recent maintenance work including an oil leak repair and full engine refresh. They also note the challenges faced with the right rear door, confirming that it will be repaired before the vehicle is released. Discussion among community members, such as @hl1177 and @Txtriathlete, revolves around various queries about the car’s service history and condition, indicating an interest in potential issues while acknowledging the overall appeal of the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns arise from several commentators regarding the vehicle's maintenance needs, with @oldsouth inquiring about potential issues with the rear door and control arms. @ChuckinTucson points out the missing button for Keyless Go, noting its absence during a driving video and raising questions about its functionality. Concerns about the vehicle's price and value relative to past sales also surface, as seen in @dengreene's mention about the distance from the last sale price."
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @LarryM expresses admiration for the vehicle, noting it is a beauty and highlighting the design elements of the 1961 model, particularly the minimal chrome and side cove design. @Pcrtom, a previous owner, shares positive insights about the car's driving capabilities, stating it is reliable and handles well. @Flunder908 praises the vehicle's condition and aesthetic appeal, emphasizing its prestigious history in endurance racing and expressing that any buyer would be proud to own such a fine example of a Corvette.
Neutral: @Mitchell4321 (The Seller) mentions plans to provide cold and warm start videos and better images of engine stamps, indicating an openness to transparency regarding the vehicle's condition. Several comments ask for specific details about the car's components, such as the Rochester part number and original wheel sizes, demonstrating an active curiosity among potential buyers about the car's specifications. @alhewitt, a prior owner, shares maintenance efforts and updates made during their ownership, providing context to the vehicle's history without negative connotations.
Negative: @masatsune raises concerns about visible issues with the hood and driver's door from previous sales, asking for clarification on any additional problems with the vehicle. @IMTede questions the car's history, specifically inquiring about potentially problematic serial numbers and accident history. @corvettecowboy asks for confirmation on whether the engine is original, suggesting possible doubts regarding the authenticity and overall integrity of the vehicle.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Quadrifoglio compliments the bike's beautiful restoration and rare color, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. Also, @Enduroguy68 shares an enthusiastic reflection on the bike's performance and nostalgia associated with it, indicating a fondness for the CT70H and its capabilities. Overall, the comments convey excitement and admiration for the bike's looks and historical significance.
Neutral: @Benz58 (The Seller) provides detailed information about the bike, noting its original motor and low mileage, and expresses willingness to assist with shipping. @andyrog finds the bike visually appealing but suggests that a cold start video would be more effective if it showed someone actually starting the bike. This indicates a balanced view of the bike, appreciating its appearance while also seeking clarity on its functionality.
Negative: @Kaymatt offers a more critical perspective, indicating that while the bike is fairly nice and a good rider, it needs some tender loving care to reach its full potential. He mentions specific issues, such as non-original rear shocks and a potential spray-painted engine, implying that there are aspects customers should be aware of before purchasing. This critical feedback serves to inform potential buyers about the bike's condition more realistically.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Tnbusiness71 describes the vehicle as a 'beast' and zombie apocalypse ready, praising its build quality. @Beans_Bacon expresses strong enthusiasm, stating 'I LOVE THIS!!!' @Envypete considers it possibly the nicest H1 built to date and appreciates the practical aspects and great photos. @LongDucDong also praises the vehicle, calling it the coolest HMMWV seen in a while, while @RobLibera (The Seller) highlights the vehicle's condition and handling, noting it might be able to beat the 37-second mark for its acceleration.
Neutral: @RobLibera (The Seller) provides clarifications on several inquiries, explaining the history of the vehicle's claims and stating its salvage title would not be applicable. @buzzbox thanks @RobLibera for the details after his previous inquiries about the vehicle's history. Other comments inquire about the vehicle's location with @DAC1 asking and @RobLibera confirming it as North Vancouver, British Columbia, and mentioning that there will be no import fees for U.S. buyers, simplifying the buying process.
Negative: @buzzbox raises concerns regarding the vehicle's history of damage from a collision and theft, questioning what impact this might have on its title in the U.S. @sirmathrocks inquires about multiple insurance claims, suggesting possible issues with the vehicle's condition, while @WakeupTR asks about the performance implications of modifications, implying potential downsides. Overall, some comments reflect skepticism regarding the vehicle's past, particularly its insurance history.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @RKD1989 mentioned that the car is super sweet, while @MrAuto007 praised its cleanliness and low mileage, deeming it a great buy. @Bordeaux shared his experience with a similar model, highlighting its reliability and comfort, and stated that a well-maintained Mercedes ages like fine wine, asserting that the buyer would be pleased with the purchase. @ObscureCars (The Seller) echoed these sentiments by emphasizing how the car is worry-free and has been barely driven, further assuring prospective buyers of its condition.
Neutral: @jeffs3820 raised a concern regarding possible damage to the sunroof vent louvers and requested service history beyond the Carfax report, along with underbody pictures. @PSBCJ inquired about the functionality of the car's electrical accessories and pointed out potential sun damage on the rear seat headrests. Subsequent replies included @bigjohn69 questioning the tire age, and @Aliaksandr83 asking about other potential damages and mold, as well as seeking clarification on an open recall.
Negative: @schermd expressed concern over an open recall related to a glass roof, questioning if it could potentially fly off. @Avcat123 discussed a known timing chain issue in engines and shared personal experiences of having a mechanic take care of a similar problem, indicating potential repair costs in the thousands. @Bordeaux also acknowledged that despite known issues, they require regular inspections and a reliable workshop for maintenance.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters express enthusiasm for the unique design of the 1960 Valiant, describing it as bizarre yet charming, with @austin_alfa noting its resemblance to something out of a sci-fi movie. The nostalgic sentiment is prevalent among users like @Stock_Valiant, who reminisces about the Valiant's quirky styling and reliable performance, while @Philip highlights the exotic appeal of its design. Many believe this car is a rare gem worth restoring, which @Rpharesjr and @Dollycat3, for instance, advocate for by suggesting modern upgrades to enhance its performance.
Comments also reflect a sense of community and shared memories associated with these vehicles, with users like @Spider_Mike recalling fondly how his family’s Valiant was a dependable ride despite its less-than-attractive aesthetics. Numerous respondents, including @Undertaker and @sagntpepper78, celebrate the distinctive character and historical significance of these cars, suggesting they hold a special place in automotive culture.
Neutral: A few commenters present neutral observations about the vehicle's history and performance potential. @Collins4A mentions the availability of original parts for restoration, emphasizing its practicality for collectors and enthusiasts. @Oldwheels76, the seller, provides insight into the maintenance and upgrades of the 1960 Valiant, discussing its engine and cooling system, while others like @RSM share their personal experiences with Valiants, indicating that these cars offer reliability despite their unconventional looks. Commentary varies from practical advice about parts sourcing to considerations for driving long distances in the car, as interactions reveal both breadth and depth in opinions regarding its functionality.
Negative: Some commentators voice skepticism regarding the vehicle’s appeal and reliability. @Robin shares a negative recollection of a family friend’s Valiant, remembering it as one of the ugliest cars they had encountered, while @Gord6 contemplates whether the car could be a great purchase or a money pit. @PMB-BTR reflects on the car's unusual styling, implying it may not meet the traditional taste for beauty in automobiles. Additionally, @Valiantjim shares mixed feelings about the design, identifying potential performance improvements while acknowledging the original aesthetic might not attract everyone. Overall, these comments reflect a critical view of the Valiant's design that contrasts with the more positive feedback from other users.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Svn03sn (The Seller) provided a prompt solution to the concerns raised by @BlondieBoxster regarding the 'potential odometer rollback indication', ensuring that the Carfax report was updated to reflect accurate information. This proactive approach has reassured potential buyers about the vehicle's history and integrity.
Neutral: The comments reflect a balanced curiosity towards the vehicle's condition and maintenance history, with users like @993fan inquiring about the maintenance records and A/C servicing. Additionally, @bimmmmer's request for videos of the car starting and running suggests a desire for more visual proof of the car's functionality.
Negative: However, concerns persist, as @993fan pointed out that the listing still indicates a mileage issue on the Carfax, contrary to @Svn03sn's update. This inconsistency could potentially deter buyers who are wary of vehicles with a questionable mileage history, highlighting a need for further clarification and resolution.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Spider_Mike praised the vehicle as a cool and versatile option, expressing a desire for a similar left-hand drive version to be produced in the US. @Bigboy755, the seller, provided prompt updates on requested details and showed a willingness to engage with potential buyers by sharing more photos and clarifying information.
Neutral: Several commenters like @UscPhd97_ and @Aerialophidian sought clarification on specific features such as the air conditioning, cargo dimensions, and other particulars of the vehicle. @Bigboy755 consistently responded quickly, providing details on the vehicle's condition, including its cold air conditioning and the absence of rust, while mentioning the cargo area dimensions after measuring.
Negative: Concerns were raised by commenters including @Edwardo46 regarding the absence of cruise control and the potential for rust, which @Bigboy755 later addressed by assuring no rust and offering to upload further pictures. @rexhavoc questioned the use of ice tires on a Florida vehicle, hinting at usability issues, while @MrJWT pointed out specific concerns about the locking mechanism and the makeshift zip tie support for the back step bumper.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Jamride commented that it's a beautiful car and mentions a personal bias due to having a duplicate model. @alfriedesq described it as an amazing machine, while @rightsaidfred expressed excitement about the car's striking Guards Red color. @TommyBruin appreciated the car's quality calling it a fine example and @boaboyoz found it to be seriously cool and gorgeous. @Goldstein, the seller, frequently engages with the commenters to share updates about the car, including future video uploads and its original mileage.
Neutral: @mrarchi suggested the need for a driving video and questioned the car's mileage history. @Scott_S inquired about why the low mileage engine needed a rebuild, while @urielle noted that the radio does not appear to be original, which detracts from the overall interior aesthetic. @Carrerachas highlighted the previous maintenance work done on the car and the unique muffler design but reflects on past missed opportunities for purchasing similar models. @Goldstein responded to questions about the engine and exhaust, confirming the meticulous ownership and recent additions to the video gallery.
Negative: @Seaate20 feels that the interior could be improved with red gauges, indicating some dissatisfaction. @solidlifters raised concerns about the absence of the original radio and inquired if it can be provided. @PorscheAir and @RufGmbH both requested paint meter readings and transparency regarding any bodywork or painting, indicating skepticism about the car's condition. These comments show that while the car is well-regarded, there are notable concerns regarding originality and the work history.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle's pristine condition and history. @Choopie noted the beauty of the truck, while @Alaskastang described it as a "gem" that has clearly been well-loved, reflecting on the durability of these trucks even in harsh conditions. @Schmima2 called it a time capsule, showcasing its remarkable upkeep, and @cougar68XR-7GTspeed expressed admiration for its near-new condition, hoping to follow the auction until the end. @Mercuryman reflected on the comfort of the seats and likened the truck to a previous model he owned, speaking to the truck's quality and feel.
Neutral: @MOK5 (The Seller) provided detailed information about the truck's background, stating that it was bought from a meticulous owner who maintained it in excellent condition. He described the history of the truck, including limited usage and constant protection from the elements. @MOK5 also confirmed the truck has modern features, including a trailering wire harness and automatic transmission but clarified that it has never been used for towing. The seller engaged with potential buyers, such as @SoP, indicating that he is open to questions and wants to ensure transparency in the auction process.
Negative: While the comments are largely positive, a couple of questions indicated some uncertainty. @deano2023 inquired about who cleaned the truck, implying curiosity about how it maintained its cleanliness. Additionally, @hunterfisher asked for clarification regarding the presence of a trailer hitch, suggesting that some potential buyers might be looking for specific features that could affect their bidding decisions.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @StoningtonImports has detailed the features of the 1997 Honda Acty Attack model, highlighting its excellent condition with all original parts, including the paint and body components. The unique options such as 4WD with diff lock, extra lo forward and reverse crawler gears, and air conditioning are rare and add significant value. The seller emphasizes that the vehicle is ready to drive with no immediate service needs, and notes the high auction Grade 4 status, indicating that this Acty is an exceptional find in the market. Commenter @Burdy expresses their enjoyment of the Acty Attack, reinforcing the model's capabilities and versatility, while @StovePipe82 appreciates the commitment to original vehicles and critiques the prevalence of lower-quality models.
Neutral: Multiple inquiries were made regarding additional details about the vehicle. @Suncitychris inquired about the payload rating, the ignition key status, and the availability of the factory owner's manual, while @justswapit asked if a viewing could be arranged. @StoningtonImports responded positively to these queries, indicating the willingness to provide the requested information and to arrange a showing. The dialogue illustrates an active interest in the vehicle, with potential buyers seeking more information about its specifications and availability.
Negative: Some minor concerns were addressed by @StoningtonImports about the condition of the vehicle, such as fingerprint smudges on the bumper and a misinterpretation regarding the gas tank appearance. Additionally, the seller clarified that while top speeds can exceed 100 km/h, he does not encourage driving at those speeds in practice, suggesting that 80-90 km/h is more practical. There was also a request from @Suncitychris for more detailed photographs of the driver's side and passenger side floor pans, but the seller indicated that they are currently unable to fulfill this request due to being out of town and the vehicle being in storage.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Wolfenhaus noted that the car is "BAD AF" and @GDogg expressed admiration, calling it "absolutely spectacular" and a "glorious GTB Fiorano." @NCRSmaniac commented on the stunning appearance of the Ferrari seats, while @LamboFan123 praised it as one of the best specifications seen on a 599. @theforce88 also added encouragement by wishing the seller good luck with the sale, and @Kpatel25 highlighted the fun factor of the car, particularly enjoying the driving experience with the manual transmission.
Neutral: @mcqueens (The Seller) clarified the reasons for the quick sale, stating that the current owner did not drive the car as much as intended and confirmed that no original parts are included. @Stick_Shift_Nick inquired about emissions testing, to which @mcqueens replied that the car passed an emissions inspection in Texas in April 2020 but had no further details due to the aftermarket exhaust installation. @GrigioF430 observed the history of the car on the auction platform, noting a decline in comments over time, which raises questions about waning interest or potential increases as the auction nears its end.
Negative: @Biff21572 expressed concerns about the condition of the door jamb stickers and other features that seemed inconsistent, suggesting a possibly cleaned flood car. @Mac_attack91 questioned why the car had been listed multiple times over two years without being sold. @evil_gtr remarked on the car appearing to show excessive wear for its mileage, and @NewmanChuck felt any potential purchase might be hampered by unattractive aspects like the headlights. Additionally, some comments pointed to a desired in-car driving video, indicating a level of skepticism towards the car's overall condition.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @packardv8 shares fondness for the vehicle, stating it remains one of their all-time favorite drivers, finding it fun to push a slower car to its limits rather than cruising in a faster vehicle. @Spokayman also comments on its good condition considering the mileage and praises the cleanliness under the rear carpet, highlighting it looks almost new. Overall, the comments reflect a genuine appreciation for the car's driving experience and condition.
Neutral: The Seller, @ForzaCarCompanyPA, expresses gratitude for the positive comments and assures they will provide more detailed photos upon request to address various inquiries about the vehicle, including areas of paint and seat condition. Additionally, the seller clarifies queries about the rear wiper option and the clutch's originality, stating that the car was honored by its previous owner who took meticulous care of it.
Negative: @Varnish raises a concern regarding the new hatch struts, suggesting they could lead to rear window delamination as the vehicle ages. @GLTL points out an inconsistency with the option sticker concerning the rear wiper, questioning if the hatch has been replaced. @kscritch shows interest in the clutch replacement history, hinting at potential issues due to the vehicle's age and condition.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its nice condition and original features. @Dbran6172 described it as a 'wonderful car' that 'just needs a little love', echoing sentiments of others who appreciate the classic nature of the 1967 model. @Tom_S. pointed out the presence of an OEM jack in the trunk, which is a positive sign for collectors. @Spider_Mike also highlighted the appeal of the car, calling 1967 the high point for the model, further emphasizing its nostalgic qualities. Other commentators like @earlspoint1 mentioned the vehicle as a 'very nice example', indicating potential interest despite personal limitations. @F27 and @unclmank applauded the design and functionality around the headlight switch, appreciating the historical context of its modifications.
Neutral: The discussion included neutral inquiries from potential buyers, such as @Just-a-fan-1971 asking if the car could be seen in person. @DTNorth (The Seller) confirmed availability for in-person viewings, suggesting a welcoming approach for interested parties. Comments regarding technical aspects were mixed, with various users addressing the headlight switch's location and the implications of the missing washer pump button. Acknowledgments of the car's potential needed repairs or restorations were mentioned, like the front suspension needing rebuilding and the interior being due for refreshment, indicating an understanding that some wear is natural for a vehicle of this age.
Negative: Some comments also pointed to negative aspects of the vehicle's condition. @Dbran6172 pointed out 'holes in the bulkhead for speakers', which could detract from the car’s originality. @earlspoint1 noted that the car's structural panel had been cut for speakers, something that is common but not ideal for a unibody vehicle. Critics also commented on areas needing attention, such as the rubber parts in suspension being 'shot', although they acknowledged it remains drivable. The observations by @F27 about the headlight switch and comments on the car's various modifications and missing parts reflect a cautious perspective on its overall integrity as a classic.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments contain a few positive remarks regarding the vehicle, particularly highlighting its original condition. @German007 (The Seller) emphasizes that the SL is all original and in perfect condition, with the soft top, exterior paint, and interior all being in excellent shape. This suggests that the car maintains its authenticity and has not undergone any significant alterations, which is often appealing to potential buyers. Additionally, @bdeweyp mentions a curious connection with the seller, noting they own the same model and color, which may indicate a shared appreciation for the car's value and aesthetic.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a neutral tone, particularly focusing on inquiries and clarifications about the car's condition. @jmar2025 asks detailed questions about the paint, upholstery, and soft top's condition, indicating a genuine interest in understanding the vehicle's state before possibly making a purchase. Others like @patriottrader and @krb1071 weigh in on the auction process, discussing the implications of bidding errors and experiences with the auction platform. These conversations provide context to the auction environment rather than direct critiques or praises about the vehicle itself.
Negative: On the negative side, there are comments expressing skepticism about the vehicle’s condition despite the seller's claims. @krb1071 points out discrepancies in the Carfax report versus the visible signs of damage on the undercarriage, raising concerns about transparency regarding the car's history. Additionally, @eggzackly criticizes the listing photos taken by the seller, stating that they present the car in an unappealing way, which can negatively affect potential bids and overall impressions of the vehicle.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments highlight the aesthetic appeal of the 450SL roadster, which is described as a beautiful example with a unique color combination. @Dollycat3 expressed admiration for the attractive green leather interior, while @Tx246 noted that the unusual color scheme, likening green to the new red in sports cars, is quite appealing. Additionally, @Axlereid complimented the period-appropriate avocado green, stating it fits the vehicle well, further adding to its character. The seller, @HealeyBrothers, has reinforced the car's quality by sharing extensive records of maintenance amounting to over $34,000, emphasizing the vehicle's good condition and operability, including a functional air-conditioning system.
Neutral: Comments frequently revolve around the car's specifications and maintenance history, with many potential buyers seeking clarification on details. @bobgreenman raised questions about the rear part of the front subframe and tire date codes, showing interest in the vehicle's technical condition. In response, @HealeyBrothers assured that they would provide requested images and further information about the car’s condition. There were also inquiries regarding the interior material, where @Jojogolong speculated it was MBTex while @HealeyBrothers confirmed it had been refreshed in 2015, maintaining its beauty. Various participants, including @darose900, asked questions about safety features and necessary inspections, indicating a cautionary yet engaged approach from potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were voiced over the car's maintenance regime, with @Jojogolong noting a lapse in servicing over the past decade. This raises questions about the overall safety and functionality of the vehicle, particularly regarding the needed reinforcement plates for the subframe that were mentioned as potentially uninstalled. @darose900 sought clarification on necessary repairs for safe operation, further heightening concern about the vehicle's readiness for everyday use. Suggestions from commenters, like ensuring the dealership retrofits it, underscore reservations about buying a classic car with uncertain maintenance history. @Rotors echoed this sentiment by highlighting the importance of maintaining the fuel system in older vehicles that may not be driven frequently, indicating a broader apprehension about the implications of long periods of inactivity on such classic autos.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Supabass expressed excitement about the vehicle, calling it a "beautiful car" and envisioning an epic drive. @TommyC praised the elegance and driving pleasure of the V8 Vantage, echoing @Raffi's sentiments about its performance and design. Additionally, @Turbowned and @Speedraser shared their favorable views on the 2009 model as a sweet spot in the V8 Vantage range, highlighting its attractive features like the Sports Pack and the 4.7L engine. Coupled with @Skidog214’s description of the smooth engine and handling characteristics, it creates a glowing impression of this vehicle.
Neutral: @Raffi, the seller, provided comprehensive details about the car, including its features, mileage, and maintenance history. He addressed inquiries regarding the navigation system's functionality and the car's upholstery, ensuring prospective bidders understood the status of the interior and any repairs performed. Comments from @fatbird66 regarding upholstery and paint quality were acknowledged, with the seller clarifying aspects of the car's appearance and restoration efforts throughout its history.
Negative: @rhern213, @sjsche, and @whetkid raised concerns regarding specific issues like the navigation system's report of being inoperable and the condition of the passenger seat. @sjsche expressed skepticism regarding the car's mileage history, suggesting potential ambiguities in its importation. @whetkid's inquiry about the dents in the seat uncovering potential underlying damage suggests caution regarding the car’s condition. Overall, the seller worked to address these concerns while emphasizing transparency about the car's condition.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Cclason appreciates the truck's white and grey interior, suggesting it has a good overall look despite questioning whether it has been resprayed. They express hope for the next owner to improve it further by removing the blue carpet, indicating a positive outlook on the vehicle's potential. Additionally, @malachim (The Seller) expresses excitement about the auction, indicating a positive mindset and readiness to engage with potential buyers, portraying the truck as a cherished possession that he wishes to pass on to an enthusiastic owner.
Neutral: @Spinnaker2022 points out a potential issue regarding the missing lower rocker panel trim in the vehicle's photos, raising a question about whether these were omitted during repainting or bodywork. The inquiry suggests an awareness of the vehicle's condition but doesn't overtly reflect a negative opinion. Similarly, @malachim acknowledges that the rocker panel trim is missing on both sides, providing context to @Spinnaker2022's comment without displaying any strong bias one way or the other about its impact on the vehicle's appeal.
Negative: The comments indicate a level of concern surrounding the truck's condition, particularly regarding the missing rocker panel trim mentioned by @Spinnaker2022 and followed up by @malachim's confirmation of its absence. @Cclason's inquiry about whether the truck is a respray implies skepticism about its originality, while @malachim notes the repaint likely occurred due to an accident reported around 2011, which may raise red flags about the vehicle's history. The overall tone conveys some apprehension about the truck's preservation, hinting that potential buyers should tread carefully regarding its past.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters shared their enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as an amazing machine that offers thrilling performance and sublime handling. @WLACA, who owns a similar model, emphasized the joy of driving the car, stating that it provides miles of smiles on the road or while cruising. They and others assured that the build quality is excellent and that the driving experience, particularly in 'Sport+' mode, transforms the car into a more aggressive and dynamic vehicle. @P0rsche956 also praised the car for its strong performance, noting it's a great option without the stigma associated with poor handling.
Neutral: The seller @Arachmale was very responsive to questions, providing detailed answers about the car's features and condition. They confirmed the presence of keyless-go but noted that there is no heated steering wheel or adaptive cruise control. Additionally, they indicated that the car has had two owners, has never been in an accident, and currently shows 5605 miles on the odometer. @Malibubimmer and other potential bidders requested information about the car's features, including whether it has a Burmeister audio system and specifics about its registration history.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns over certain features that potential buyers might expect but are not available in this model. For example, @Theclutch inquired about the heated steering wheel, which the seller confirmed is absent. @Malibubimmer asked various questions regarding the car's specifications and condition, hinting at a cautious approach from potential buyers wanting to ensure that they are making an informed decision. There were also inquiries about driving videos and the car's warranty, indicating a desire for more evidence of the vehicle's condition than what was visually provided.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @PSCC (The Seller) appreciates the interest in their listing for the 1-Mile 2021 Ducati Panigale V2, which is presented as part of a large motorcycle collection. The seller emphasizes the care taken with the motorcycle, noting that it has been stored in climate-controlled conditions and kept on a trickle charger. They also convey a sense of pride in being a reputable dealer with 30 years of experience, offering an elite selection of luxury vehicles and professional transportation services.
Neutral: Commenters express various opinions about the bike's limited mileage. @Freewiley suggests that some motorcycles are best admired rather than ridden. @trieste5 echoes this sentiment, stating that appreciating a motorcycle’s beauty can be more rewarding than letting it sit unused. @Zenyatta1 asks practical questions regarding the purchase documentation and modifications, indicating a keen interest in the bike despite the low mileage, while @PSCC affirms the bike's original stock condition and answers the queries positively.
Negative: A few commenters, such as @ITTIMEFORBED and @Magge52, exhibit a sense of regret about the bike's minimal usage, suggesting that the motorcycle is meant to be ridden and enjoyed rather than just displayed. @ITTIMEFORBED calls attention to the idea that the bike would prefer to be in action rather than admired in its unused state. There is an implication that the motorcycle is missing out on its purpose, leading to skepticism about ownership methods for high-quality bikes.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle's appealing attributes, emphasizing its relatively low mileage of 45,000 and its well-preserved single hump design in E93 trim, which is seen as desirable among enthusiasts. According to @lutzup, this might be one of the last production cars that can be enjoyed without modern screens, making it unique. The experience of driving with the top down and the thrill of the engine at high RPMs is highlighted, indicating that potential buyers should seriously consider the purchase if they are intrigued by its specifications. @nnie195 remarked on the interior condition, claiming it appears nearly brand new, while @aSingh39 (the Seller) noted that despite the car's age, it stands out in terms of quality.
Neutral: Several commenters brought up technical aspects of the vehicle, including maintenance concerns like the VANOS system and potential rod bearings or throttle actuators issues. @Secretariat19 noted a solid service history on Carfax with some minor gaps, questioning if there are independent records available. Meanwhile, @davidad asked if the vehicle has Bluetooth, highlighting considerations for modern usability. @rmoudry also inquired about protective elements like a clear bra on the front, reflecting a mix of interest in both maintenance details and how the car stands in terms of current standards.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's maintenance, specifically the VANOS caps, as flagged by @ff40 who described potential issues related to their degradation over time. Responses indicate that while some readers perceive the interior condition as needing a deep clean, this perspective was later softened by @Secretariat19, who acknowledged normal signs of wear instead of neglect. The discussion around potential age-related concerns and interior detailing reflects a cautious approach among buyers. Additionally, @johnjackK pointed out clunking noises in a driving video, leading to questions about the vehicle's handling quality and road imperfections, creating a sense of uncertainty about its overall performance.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments highlight the impressive condition of the vehicle, particularly considering its 279,000 miles, suggesting that it is a testament to the durability of Land Cruisers (@Espanolie). Another enthusiast, @C2Davis, expresses admiration for the vehicle's history and its well-maintained presentation, noting that it has been loved for over a decade. The seller, @Cedwards0405, confirms that the truck has been meticulously cared for and has handled long drives without issue, adding to its positive reputation among potential buyers.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and specific repairs, such as rust work performed in 2023. @MtnMantologist asks for the shop that reupholstered the front seats, while @CHarbin84 and others inquire about the functionality of the heating and air conditioning system. @Logansmamma raises questions about any potential unreported damage and the condition of the body, showing a balanced interest in understanding the vehicle's past.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised by potential buyers regarding the vehicle's repair history, particularly related to rust repairs and whether any fluid leaks or oil burning issues are present. @smhpony requests detailed information about the rust repairs and any potential leaks, while @letthegypsyhaveit and @stevenaroberts89 ask for invoices or guarantees for the repairs. These comments suggest a level of skepticism among buyers, emphasizing the importance of documentation and transparency in the vehicle's maintenance history.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BimmerDawg loves the Lunar Blue color and appreciates the tasteful modifications on the car, expressing admiration for its overall aesthetic. @hdfinder47 finds the vehicle extremely nice and has great interest in its performance specifications. @becevit is so impressed that they humorously express a desire to rob a bank to obtain it, noting it as the best E63 they've seen. @sidud and @Dryfly57 both acknowledge its stunning visual appeal, with the latter even stating it takes their breath away. Multiple users, including @juhaMikkola and @k5shawn, confirm the car's excellent condition and performance, praising its overall handling and mechanical upkeep.
Neutral: @Redfire03 mentions their journey in finding this specific E63S wagon and explains the repairs made after a minor incident with a trash truck. They provide insights into the vehicle's modifications, including the suspension lowering modules and performance tunes, while confirming the brakes have not been changed yet are in good working condition. The seller also highlights their engagement with potential bidders, expressing an appreciation for the interest and positive feedback about the car throughout the auction process.
Negative: @Steven007 raises a concern about the car's reported damage on the car fax report, expressing confusion over what was affected. @Inglewood questions how one would transition from owning such a coveted longroof vehicle without experiencing disappointment afterward. @k5shawn shares their perspective that the current bidding price seems out of their range despite the vehicle being in mint condition. Some commenters also question the car's performance specifications with regards to the roof box and suspension modifications, reflecting potential hesitations ahead of bidding.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle's aesthetic, with @boaboyoz calling it a "sweet silver and grey C10" and noting its "beautiful build." @MarkNeely also highlighted the vehicle's nice presentation, expressing his admiration by saying, "Nicely done, and well presented C10!" Additionally, @SLCAndy11 appreciated the color combination and stance, contributing to the overall positive feedback regarding the truck's design. @Beans_Bacon mentioned that the LS2 engine is amazing, further emphasizing the quality of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters posed questions regarding the specifics of the truck. @Granddad50 inquired about the rear end's configuration and if the LS motor was a crate or donor engine. @1Chry56 also asked for better photos of the bed floor and raised concerns about potential rust spots, indicating they were looking to clarify the vehicle's condition. @MiamiVice33 asked if there was an air conditioning system, which @Dwells107 confirmed it has, showing the buyer's interest in the truck's functionality.
Negative: Some comments hinted at concerns surrounding the vehicle's condition. @1Chry56 mentioned they noticed possible pitting under the bed liner, which could suggest underlying issues with rust. This raised questions for potential buyers about the truck's maintenance and overall quality. However, no direct criticisms of the work done on the vehicle were noted, as most feedback remained cautiously optimistic rather than overtly negative.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The seller, @Toyoter, has been active and responsive to potential buyers, offering additional photos and clarifications about the vehicle as questions arise. Commenters like @MkushiMike appreciate the vehicle's unique appearance, noting it as a beautiful blue with a nice specification. Additionally, the seller has provided reassurance regarding the vehicle's maintenance, sharing information about the recent upkeep and lack of significant issues.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @hacksawhack and @danielsoneg, have raised valid inquiries about the car's condition, past ownership, and documentation, showing a moderate level of interest while also being keen on ensuring they are making a well-informed decision. @TXDesFox asked about additional historical documentation about the car, reflecting a desire for transparency, yet remaining open-minded about the purchase.
Negative: However, concerns have been voiced regarding the vehicle's previous ownership history, with @Islandsaway questioning why the seller is parting with it so soon after acquiring it, suggesting potential red flags about reliability. @hacksawhack also expressed worries over the lack of detailed scheduled maintenance records and the costs associated with bringing an older vehicle up to par, indicating a cautious approach from potential buyers.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors have shown a lot of enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly praising its color and unique design. @Msobczyk expressed appreciation for the striking color, while @Whadeduck mentioned seeing the car from a distance and noted that the paint definitely attracts a lot of attention. @fastducky, who has seen the car on the road, called it stunning and a real head-turner. @altaylar and @DavilB both highlighted the value the car offers compared to the AMG GT, emphasizing that it is a step up in terms of performance and a special driving experience. The seller @tapezzi emphasized the reliability and fun aspects of the car, citing their enjoyable ownership experience and the positive responses from their wife, a sign of the car's comfort as well as its sportiness.
Neutral: The seller @tapezzi provided detailed information about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history, mentioning that it is clean with no paintwork visible, has a clean Carfax, and has been driven regularly over the past 18 months, accruing about 15,000 miles. The only notable mechanical issue occurred when a coil pack was replaced, but this was resolved, and the dashboard currently shows no warning lights. They also noted some cosmetic flaws, such as small rock chips on the front end and a filled chip in the windshield, while maintaining that these do not detract significantly from the car's overall appearance. Comments from others inquiring about the car's condition suggest that the vehicle has been daily driven, which is not uncommon.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's cosmetic imperfections. @PhilMcCrackenn advised that the seller should clean the car before taking photos, as the current images give an impression of a lack of care. Additionally, @tlward413 questioned the alignment of the front bumper gaps, suggesting they might indicate prior damage or a replacement, which @tapezzi contested, stating they had not noticed any such issues during their ownership. @PricesAreTooHigh inquired about potential leather bubbling, to which the seller reassured that the dash was not peeling and had been parked in the garage during their ownership. Overall, while the car has been well taken care of mechanically, some commenters feel its aesthetics could be improved for selling purposes.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters have expressed appreciation for the bike's aesthetic and performance. @Dogfeathers highlighted the iconic design of Triumph motorcycles from this era, noting the perfect blend of engine power, body style, and overall performance. They praised the bike for its originality and just enough wear to show that it has been enjoyed over the years without being overly restored. Additionally, @Wantemallnow commended the seller for an honest listing, appreciating the transparency provided regarding the bike's specifications and condition.
Neutral: Commenters discussed technical aspects and specific features of the motorcycle, such as the presence of a 750cc bore kit and nuances around its components. @cerdle mentioned the potential for the bike to have a smaller cylinder base hold down nut indicative of the larger bore kit. Meanwhile, @KADUTZ noted incongruities like the lack of a chrome upper grab rail and questioned the exhaust header pipes, suggesting modifications might be necessary but recognizing the bike's overall appeal. The seller, @arts44, corrected the year of the carburetor installation and mentioned additional features like included gas tank knee pad bumpers.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about certain missing components and aspects of the bike that detracted from its value. @KADUTZ pointed out the missing grab rail and noted discrepancies with the exhaust parts, implying that these features could affect its authenticity or completeness. @adbunch further questioned the exhaust header pipes, indicating that they may not belong to the correct model year. Overall, while the comments reveal an appreciation for the motorcycle, there are notable critiques regarding its originality and necessary repairs.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle, particularly @Nogiboi who was thrilled to see a 66k miles NC1. @MegaMan68 emphasized the joy of seeing such cars driven, echoing @neuronbob's sentiment that these vehicles are meant to be enjoyed and not just stored away. Additionally, @boaboyoz praised the vehicle as an exquisite example while @Drubnitz (The Seller) shared his heartfelt attachment to the car, describing it as a dream to drive and detailing the high level of care he has given it, such as meticulous cleaning and regular servicing at Southern Motors Acura.
Neutral: Several comments noted the history of the vehicle, with @Duke_Dallas questioning the Carfax report that listed two owners, to which @Drubnitz (The Seller) clarified the situation around leasing and buying the car. Various users like @Rhayner confirmed that the Carfax may inaccurately reflect ownership changes due to lease buyouts. @Drubnitz also discussed the condition of the hybrid battery and additional repairs done recently, reassuring potential buyers of the car's maintenance history.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some commenters about the vehicle's documentation and service history. @SenyForever inquired about the original car model and build sheet, which @Drubnitz stated were lost in a fire. Additionally, @XavierClock13 questioned the service history regarding the ceramic brakes while @Struttin sought clarification on the next service interval, revealing a general apprehension regarding maintenance for potential buyers. It was also noted by @CRed that the absence of videos showing the cold start or driving might limit the auction's appeal.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its stunning appearance and rarity, with many enthusiasts expressing admiration for the '69 427 Corvette. @Scott68GTO described it as absolutely stunning, while @stugottz referred to it as a "Holy Grail" car. @Coronette praised its impressive condition, clean details, and appealing features, indicating it is a well-maintained vehicle. The seller also provided background information about the car's modest usage, showcasing the maintained mileage and original body panels, further contributing to its desirability.
Neutral: Several comments raised inquiries regarding specific aspects of the vehicle, such as the carburetors, fuel requirements, and the rear end ratio. @swsadler asked about the fuel used for the high-performance engine, while @djenks212 inquired about the rear end ratio, which the seller confirmed as 3.70:1. Furthermore, @stocknawe pointed out a unique feature of the car related to the interior console. There was also commentary on the absence of factory documentation and the potential need for validation of the engine stamp, showcasing some uncertainty about the car's history.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the lack of proper documentation for the L89 identity of the vehicle, with @AlPalmer10 questioning the absence of verifiable information. Commentary from @Noisyboyz suggested skepticism regarding the quality of the carburetors, indicating that their presence might affect the car's status as a "survivor." Additionally, @HERMANCRANE pointed out discrepancies in the vehicle's components, questioning the absence of original emissions systems and suggesting alterations that might detract from its authenticity. Overall, these negative comments illustrate some hesitance among potential buyers regarding the car's originality and documentation.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Cappy1988 praises the vehicle's spectacular color combination, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @TONEPUB expresses a strong fondness for the Z3, mentioning that despite having owned various models, including a high-performance S54 Dinan S3, the 2.3 remains his favorite. His intention to seek out another yellow Z3 reflects a deep attachment and positive sentiment towards this particular model.
Neutral: @Pnybro1 notes a technical detail about the vehicle, pointing out that while the Z3 is badged as a 2.3, it actually features a 2.5-liter straight-six engine. @6SpeedBowtie acknowledges this peculiarity and shares the same sentiment about the confusion surrounding the badging. @Mercuryman provides additional context by confirming that the BMW Z3 2.3 was indeed equipped with a 2.5-liter M52B25 engine for the North American market, adding specificity to the engine details and the production history of the model.
Negative: There are no explicitly negative comments about the vehicle, but @Rgood inquires about service records, which may imply concerns about the vehicle's maintenance history. This suggests a level of wariness that potential buyers often exhibit when assessing used vehicles.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Baronvonbrutus describes the vehicle as "outstanding" while @MaineDoc emphasizes the driving experience, noting the smooth power and its appeal at fuel stations compared to other cars. @Dollycat3 calls the car a "gorgeous, original, California Desert Beige beauty" and several commenters express admiration for its aesthetics, with @JSpych stating they love the color combo and @magguu expressing a desire to care for such a vehicle. @500_PM mentions they know someone who owns a similar car and drives it daily, highlighting the beauty of the Riviera and its ongoing appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @kink56 and @BeetleBailey63, raise questions and observations about the car's condition and modifications. @kink56 points out the repainting of the engine and previous experience with Rivieras, while @BeetleBailey63 asks about the car's tags and its operational status, indicating a closer look is needed to appreciate its true value. In contrast, @Rivnut offers insights about potential rust issues, advising on inspection tips, acknowledging the challenges that come with a vehicle of this age.
Negative: Amidst the positive remarks, some users express concerns about the vehicle's condition. @BeetleBailey63 specifically mentions observable rust around the rear window and raises doubts about the car's overall restoration quality, while echoing concerns regarding the operational history inferred from its old tags. @kink56 discusses the repaint color discrepancy, which implies a need for clarification from the seller. Their comments provide a critical counterpoint to the general admiration for the car's aesthetics.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Stropp humorously likens the vehicle to something Darth Vader would drive, suggesting a strong appeal to fans of striking and powerful designs. @EuroCarPal praises the unique sound of the car, comparing it to the roar of a T-Rex and highlighting its exhilarating performance, indicating that it is truly appreciated by enthusiasts. Additionally, @touchyu2 notes the effectiveness of Canadian vehicles, confirming that they meet the same standards as US ones, and compliments the car's quality overall.
Neutral: @diamondmotorworks asks for clarification on the reasons a previous deal fell through, indicating possible concerns about transparency. @mitchell996 expresses that some people buy such cars merely to hold them in a garage, suggesting a mix of admiration and criticism towards potential collectors who do not use their vehicles. @jerzeyboy730 shows interest in passing direct messages regarding another vehicle, suggesting active engagement from potential buyers without detailing specifics about the vehicle in question.
Negative: @Mfhoes raises a concern by questioning if there's a scratch visible in one of the images, which might indicate potential buyers' worries about the car's condition. @indianahorsepower (The Seller) assures that there is no scratch, implying that discrepancies in the photo might lead to misunderstandings about the vehicle's state. Overall, there are hints of skepticism from some commenters regarding the vehicle's presentation and its history.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz praised the vehicle as a fantastic Silver Metallic Bronco and complimented its tremendous build. @okbob noted that the silver color was not common and appreciated the unique spare delete feature, labeling it a cool Bronco. These comments highlight a general admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic and build quality.
Neutral: @Wajohnson444 (The Seller) provided detailed information about the vehicle's registration and smog equipment status. He explained that while the Bronco was built in Michigan and sold in North Carolina, he has it registered as an historic vehicle in Arizona, which does not require testing. He also addressed inquiries regarding the roof's weather resistance and the potential removal of the top, confirming that the roof has rubber gaskets to manage rain and can be taken off by removing bolts.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's suitability for California due to smog regulations. @Nhillard81 expressed hesitation to bid because of the state's stringent smog requirements, while @stevenbrooten elaborated on the potential costs and modifications needed to comply with California smog laws, which could be substantial. @jg1313 questioned a specific damage on the vehicle, suggesting it might be more than just paint damage, revealing a possible issue with the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @countpackula stated that the wheels are safely packed and ready to ship, indicating a good level of preparation for the auction. He also welcomed bidders to contact him directly during the auction, showing a willingness to engage with potential buyers and ensuring a smooth auction experience.
Neutral: @needle356a inquired about the refinishing of the wheels, demonstrating interest in the product's restoration and quality. @countpackula responded that the refinishing was done at Lees Wheel Repair, which he found through a local Porsche dealership, providing useful information for those concerned about the wheels' condition.
Negative: There were no negative comments reported regarding the vehicle or the auction process. The focus remained primarily on the preparations and communication from @countpackula, without any expressed concerns or complaints from potential bidders.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @djmoneymike described the vehicle as an "absolutely gorgeous machine," indicating a strong appreciation for its aesthetic qualities. @newcarpro provided detailed information about the car's specifications and history, showcasing its unique features and maintenance status. Other commenters like @Markny9 and @johnnyvett expressed admiration for the Neiman Marcus edition XLR, highlighting that it is a rare and desirable model in excellent condition. Overall, the XLR received praise for its design and the rarity that comes with owning a limited edition vehicle.
Neutral: Commenters asked questions that pointed out potential issues or concerns about the vehicle, such as @vEEEEktore's inquiry regarding the effect of a car wash on the vehicle and @TRD_OKC's request for a video of the top functioning. @ArtistFox raised a concern regarding the condition of the navigation system, which sparked a discussion about common issues with infotainment systems from that era. There was a balanced perspective regarding the operation of the vehicle's convertible top, with @Collectibleclassics acknowledging a calibration issue, implying that the top works but may need adjustment.
Negative: Several comments pointed out specific negatives, such as @JayDiesh's frustration with the delaminated infotainment screen and the suggestion that it should be repaired to maintain the car's beauty. @Royall66 noted that the top operation seemed to be struggling, which raised concerns about the vehicle's mechanical reliability. Additionally, @cad69 pointed out the missing headlight washer covers and expressed dissatisfaction with the frosted daytime running lights, indicating that there are aesthetic and functional areas needing attention.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TKC_MN (The Seller) presents an exceptional 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe, boasting only 27,000 original miles and comprehensive service records. The car features an iconic Guards Red finish complemented by a rare Grey-Green leather interior, exemplifying the class of 1980s Porsches. Its originality is highlighted by details like the factory Porsche-branded radar detector and original Blaupunkt radio, maintaining its showroom look even after nearly four decades. Enthusiasts admire the car for both its aesthetics and its mechanical readiness, making it suitable for thrilling drives or as a collector's piece. @BeOnEdge praises the vehicle for being perfect and suitable for driving on beautiful days or showcasing at car shows, while also lauding the professionalism of the Turnkey Classics team.
Neutral: Comments from users like @Halvo and @DontSink reflect curiosity about the vehicle's low mileage and maintenance history, highlighting the need for transparency regarding the odometer's issues and prior repairs. @Stuttgarthoosier seeks clarity on the radar detector's functionality and the reasons behind certain wiring exposure inside the car. Users ask probing questions regarding past maintenance, expressing cautious interest but not necessarily voicing definitive opinions about the vehicle's condition. @Michaelsmacd inquires about the A/C system efficiency, indicating a desire for information before purchase decisions.
Negative: Inquiries from potential buyers like @Arts992 raise concerns about the actual mileage accuracy, pointing out discrepancies such as excessive rock chips on the car's front and asking about documentation of repairs beyond routine maintenance. @Tri5nutt emphasizes the importance of accurate odometer history for a successful transaction. Users express skepticism, evoking a sense of caution regarding ownership and maintenance details that may not be fully disclosed by the seller. Overall, while there is palpable enthusiasm for the car's aesthetic and performance, questions about its past lead to a somewhat cautious sentiment among prospective bidders.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @aegmotorsports, the seller, highlights that the vehicle has been very well maintained, noting its excellent mechanical and cosmetic condition. The oil service was performed recently without any leaks or issues, and the seller mentioned the vehicle retains a 'new car smell' without any odors or evidence of pets. Also, it's equipped with a variety of luxury features such as the P30 AMG Performance Package which enhances its performance and aesthetics, making it a desirable choice for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments addressed inquiries about the vehicle's mileage, previous owner driving habits, and maintenance history. @PitViperRT raised a question about the mileage accumulation over years, to which @aegmotorsports confirmed the current mileage of 60,915 but noted that they do not have insights into the previous owner’s driving habits. The discussion also included confirmation of available repairs, specifically the replacement of worn rear air springs, which was handled as part of the vehicle’s inspection prior to sale.
Negative: Concerns were raised among potential buyers regarding the absence of comprehensive maintenance records and the specifics of the vehicle's performance. @MK_Ultra asked about mechanical issues, while @Justinway inquired about any noises from the cabin during driving. Despite @aegmotorsports' assurances that there were no rattles or noises, the fact that these questions were asked indicates some hesitation from buyers regarding the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @crimsonblue highlighted the beauty of the vehicle's color combination, declaring it perfection. @Mikeddds80 also praised the color combo, aligning with @Finished's ecstatic comments about the arena red metallic paint paired with beige leather, expressing how it soothes the soul. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, emphasized their commitment to smooth transactions, citing a 4.9/5.0 Google Review rating with many satisfied customers, and encouraging prospective buyers to engage with trusted shops for inspections and to reach out for any queries.
Neutral: Several commenters showed interest in practical details regarding the vehicle. @Danbeau inquired about the possibility of inspection and emission prior to pickup, while @Wjc72223 and @Henry1107 asked about tire age, with the latter assuming it might be from 2007. @Collectibleclassics replied that they welcome inspections through trusted local shops and provided details about their location and services they offer for potential buyers. They also noted that the vehicle has a dual row IMS from the factory, with low failure rates, which may alleviate some concerns among potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition, with @stewart0504 questioning if there was a crack in the windshield based on a particular photo. Additionally, @Wjc72223's inquiry into the age of the tires indicated potential issues given that some comments suggested they might be quite old, with @stewart0504 interpreting the date code as indicating the tires were from 2006. @Jtpryan's comment about the absence of an engine raised further issues about the vehicle, pointing to a lack of confidence in the car's readiness for sale.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments highlight the reliability and quality of the 2013 Cayenne Diesel. @PASTORWUG states that it has been a flawless vehicle over three years and emphasizes its longevity with proper maintenance, projecting it can run for over 300K miles. @HKMotors reinforces this by mentioning that the car is up to date with its maintenance and suggests that the Cayenne Diesel is an excellent vehicle in terms of fuel economy, noting an average of 23 mpg and potential over 30 mpg on long trips. @danger2manifold also praises the car's appearance, alongside its impressive fuel range, claiming to get up to 750 miles on a full tank, which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: Various participants are asking about specific features and details regarding the vehicle's maintenance and specifications. @LongRufLover inquires about the maintenance records and carfax details, while @DEO seeks information on the vehicle's average miles per gallon. @ScottyBux questions whether the black finish on the wheels is factory or aftermarket, showing interest in the vehicle's aesthetics. These inquiries suggest that potential buyers are gathering necessary information to assess their purchase decision, demonstrating a level of engagement with the auction process.
Negative: There are few critical comments; however, @danger2manifold mentions the possibility of higher costs associated with maintenance items. @808dude asks if there are any issues with the transfer case, which may imply a concern regarding the car's mechanical reliability. These comments reflect a cautious approach from some participants who are considering potential complications or costs associated with ownership, highlighting common concerns in the luxury SUV market.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received praise for its aesthetic appeal, with @milage noting it looks awesome and @Selltopapa expressing admiration for the premium freeflow Monza exhaust, appreciating both its sound and performance. The car is described as a beautiful 20-year-old, with @Jsac appreciating the walkaround video, highlighting the car's great looks. @blackrider, the seller, expresses gratitude for the feedback and engages with various commenters, showing an active interest in improving the listing through additional images and clarifications about the car's service history. The silver paint combined with the gold badging is seen as a nice aesthetic choice, with @funoldcarguy being particularly interested in the gold emblems.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed the photography methods used in the listing, particularly criticizing the use of wide-angle lenses for car shots, which distorted the vehicle's true stance. @spg356 and @uncle_saucebags emphasized the importance of using a standard lens for a more accurate representation of the car. @356dax asked for additional video footage to confirm the cold start functionality, suggesting that a cold start video would provide further assurance of the car’s condition. The seller, @blackrider, responded by promising to obtain more traditional photographs and noted that he had used a laser thermometer for cold start verification, attempting to address concerns from enthusiasts.
Negative: Some criticisms arose regarding the presentation and specifications of the vehicle. Commenters like @Baddogdesmo and @uncle_saucebags expressed strong opinions that wide-angle photography negatively affected the car's presentation. @funoldcarguy questioned the gold emblems' attractiveness, suggesting they do not fit the car's overall look. There was concern from users such as @turkrygeorgeno1 about the engine manufacturer, with the seller admitting a lack of access to that information due to historical corporate changes. @Jsac raised questions about upcoming service needs, indicating a level of apprehension about potential repairs that could be required on the vehicle.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @DieselM333 expressed sheer excitement about the vehicle, labeling it as "Amazing!!!!!" The comments from @motorsportsmgmt, who is the seller, highlight the car as an exceedingly special, bespoke unit with an impressive 4.6L engine that delivers outstanding performance. Other users, including @OldGuy and @JEH, praised the attention to detail in the vehicle's build and described it as 'killer' and 'bonkers' in the best way, indicating strong admiration from the community. @roberthastings even vouched for the seller's credibility, emphasizing his trustworthiness and passion for cars.
Neutral: @EddieCollins inquired about the power and torque curves for the vehicle, demonstrating interest in performance specs. @Jturboawd asked about the car's air conditioning system, while @Sjo queried the difference made by the M3 subframes in the vehicle's chassis dynamics. @Space-Horse raised a technical question regarding the engine's redline, indicating an understanding of performance modulations, which reflects a knowledgeable readership interested in the mechanical features of the car.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about the realities of modifications, particularly from @Sixtyvalve, who expressed discomfort with the regulatory process imposed by Californian authorities regarding automotive modifications. @djcyclone raised a concern about whether the Dinan stroker build addresses common issues with the S65 rod bearings, hinting at a fear of potential reliability problems. Additionally, there were playful jests from @mfarrington001 about selling personal possessions for the car, which could imply its high desirability but also underline a fear of having to compromise to attain such a vehicle.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments express appreciation for the vehicle, with several users praising its condition and performance. @67numberfive, the seller, mentioned that the car runs exceptionally well and has been actively driven recently, adding credibility to its quality. @Raptorman220 calls it a very nice Viper and the best generation to own, indicating a positive sentiment about the model itself. Additionally, users like @BobsMopars and @CastellanMC emphasize the fun factor and collectible nature of these vehicles, with @CastellanMC sharing insights about their rarity and value in Brazil, further highlighting the car's desirability.
Neutral: Commenters also engaged in discussions about the auction process and the vehicle's history. @Powrmonger inquired about the reason for the car being relisted, to which @67numberfive explained that the previous winning bidder failed to follow through, indicating a lack of commitment in the bidding process. @9literviper humorously suggested that drunk bidding might have been a factor in the last auction. Overall, the comments reflect on the dynamics of used car auctions and the particular circumstances of this vehicle, blending personal anecdotes with speculation about bidders' behavior.
Negative: Some comments touch on missed opportunities and the implications of re-listing the vehicle. @Sahara19 expressed disappointment that the car had been sitting for an extended period while clocking only a hundred miles in the past four years. However, this sentiment quickly shifted as the seller assured potential buyers of the car's great running condition. @9literviper also noted the unusual circumstances surrounding the auction with humor, suggesting that the initial high bid might have been poorly thought out. The underlying tone from several comments indicates a mix of concern and lightheartedness regarding the auction's integrity and the previous buyer's commitment.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received many accolades for its stunning design and performance characteristics. Commenters like @Oldhockyplayr and @alfriedesq praise the Ferrari's striking Bianco Avus color, which stands out as a refreshing change from traditional Rosso Corsa. @GDogg highlighted its beauty, calling it a "stunning 458 Spider" while @EuroCarPal shared their exhilarating experience driving the model, describing its ultra-sensitive acceleration and remarkable sound reminiscent of an F1 car. Overall, the car's aesthetics and driving pleasure are highly appreciated by enthusiasts.
Neutral: Questions regarding the vehicle have sparked some discussion, particularly concerning its sticky button issue. Commenters such as @KaseyT and @Rwal28 inquired about the specifics of how this issue was addressed by the seller, @ExoticsHunter, raising concerns over the methods used. @ExoticsHunter responded that all sticky buttons had been addressed and provided assurance that there were no functional issues, emphasizing that it was primarily an aesthetic concern. Other users have also asked about service history, paint condition, and reserve auction details, indicating that potential buyers are actively seeking more information before making bids.
Negative: Despite its beauty and performance, there are some concerns raised around the sticky buttons, which has led to some frustration among potential buyers. @KaseyT expressed their disappointment at not receiving answers regarding how the buttons were fixed, which contributed to their decision to halt bidding. Additionally, @Cornbread labelled the lion artwork associated with the listing as "tacky" and "smarmy," reflecting a divide in opinions on the car’s presentation. @CKart noted that the artwork might not resonate with the broader auction demographic, suggesting it could negatively impact prospective buyers' perceptions.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments about the Jeep highlight its excellent condition and appealing features. @Mychordistooshort described it as a beautiful TJ with the right color and perfect lift, suggesting it should have come this way from the factory. @CRUSH appreciated the lifted appearance, along with the aesthetics of its wheels and tires, expressing excitement for such vehicles. The seller, @Jake212022, reassured potential buyers about the Jeep's quality, noting that it has been garage-kept and has never experienced inclement weather, indicating a well-cared-for vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments posed practical questions regarding the Jeep's specifications. @clickoffpls88 inquired about the height of the Jeep at the center bow of the soft top, while @zrozell asked about the size and type of lift installed. The seller provided timely responses to these queries, confirming the height and estimating the lift size and its type as a short arm, demonstrating an informative dialog that addresses potential buyers' concerns.
Negative: Despite the generally positive feedback, there were mentions of a few issues with the Jeep. @Jake212022 disclosed a small 1-inch dent and minor scratches on the rear passenger side bumper caused by a Hi-Lift jack, which the seller has since removed to prevent further damage. Additionally, @tp808 raised a question about the original tires, which the seller confirmed are dated from 2006, suggesting that while the rubber is in good shape, replacement might be considered for regular use.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's design and rarity. @A7534 shared a nostalgic appreciation for the model, highlighting the distinctiveness of the 'gold M' in the bumper. @Dollycat3 praised the timeless styling of the build, while @Rpharesjr described it as "way cool" and noted its superior style compared to other classic wagons, emphasizing how rare it is to see one. @gocorcoran and @caozman also complimented its aesthetics, with @caozman finding it stunning and off-the-charts cool, reinforcing the positive sentiment around the vehicle's unique character and appearance.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification about specific details regarding the vehicle, indicating a level of intrigue about its specifications and history. @bill66gto requested additional information on when the paint job occurred and the status of the engine and transmission, while @wetwillyskate inquired about the odometer. @gocorcoran raised questions about the functionality of the push-button start after electrical changes, showing a mix of curiosity and caution about the vehicle's modern modifications. @MikeNottingham (The Seller) responded to various inquiries, confirming that certain features, like the fuel gauge, were not included in the build, and assured that he would provide further details about the restoration process.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns about the vehicle's modifications and missing features. @broodie and @TxDesFox highlighted the absence of a fuel gauge, which they found impractical and questioned the overall utility of the dash configuration. @Dcisfun made a direct comparison to a hearse, which may indicate a design oversight or a lack of appeal for some observers. Additionally, @phil_from_France noted disappointment in the replacement of the original dashboard design, suggesting that it detracted from the car's authenticity. Similarly, @lanceinsb criticized the decision to forego a functional fuel sending unit, suggesting a lack of completeness in the vehicle's build.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @topduarte remarked on the vehicle's low mileage since purchase, appreciating that the original rims were retained. @Dewey789 expressed that this is one of the nicest Gen3s on the auction platform, admitting that resisting the urge to drive it for fear of losing value would be difficult for him. @DBG1973 described the car as a beautiful example, while @OLDMANJ reminisced fondly about these cars and wished he could buy it despite recently purchasing a different model. Furthermore, @NCRSmaniac praised the car's overall aesthetics, emphasizing its great condition and appealing color combo.
Neutral: @WranglerX inquired about whether the decals had been removed, to which @MS3DALE clarified that the vehicle was ordered without stripes. @Tabp, the seller, confirmed that he installed new wheels but made no suspension modifications. During the discussion, @98WS6 noted the unfortunate scarcity of the final production year and wondered about the production history, prompting @AirWolfie to provide insights into the 1990 model year.
Negative: However, not all comments were entirely positive. @Adammarshall1983 pointed out concerns regarding the pinch welds showing signs of wear and some surface rust, speculating whether the vehicle had been stored in a colder climate. @AaronSeible acknowledged the car's excellent condition yet voiced doubt about it being a 14k-mile vehicle based on the hatch release switch scratches and the underbody. @AirWolfie also contributed to the skepticism, suggesting that while the mileage is likely correct, the vehicle could have been improperly stored leading to some degradation.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many users express appreciation for the high-quality build and design of the vehicle, particularly noting its compact size and ease of maneuverability. @Bjornsky points out that the unit allows for convenient travel, supporting trips to diverse locations without the hassles that larger RVs generate. Several comments highlight the unit's performance, including three solar panels that enable off-grid capabilities, with users mentioning it has sufficient features like a generator and a two-burner cooktop.
Neutral: Some discussions delve into practical aspects such as the time it takes to convert the sofa into a bed, which @Bjornsky claims is under five minutes, and the fact that the vehicle has only one large bed. @blitjen raises concerns about accommodating children, prompting @Bjornsky to confirm that the RV can be adapted for use by children, including the possibility of an aftermarket bed above the front seats. Users did not reach consensus about certain details, such as the availability of a spare tire or the dimensions of the vehicle's interior, indicating some uncertainty among potential buyers.
Negative: Conversely, comments reveal concerns, particularly regarding specific features of the RV. @F16Jock raises a question about previous smoking habits inside the vehicle, while @horses653 is frustrated by the absence of an outside entertainment center. Additionally, @dcreemer points out a potential concern regarding a stain visible in one of the photos, questioning any associated damage, which @Bjornsky promptly addresses as non-existent. Overall, while the unit has supporters, there are notable queries and minor complaints that potential buyers should consider.
![]() |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle for its exceptional condition, with @Mammoth21 calling it 'pristine' despite being almost 20 years old with only 1,200 miles. @Kevinbriem noted that the styling was ahead of its time, expressing admiration for the beauty of the car. The seller @4WHEEL_GERMAN highlighted the rarity of the CLS 55 AMG, referring to it as a 'once in a lifetime opportunity' with mileage that is hard to come by. @MB-BKRPT shared a positive recent experience with the seller, confirming the car was in showroom condition upon delivery, enhancing the car's allure.
Neutral: Some comments focused on practical aspects and inquiries about the vehicle's history. @John_E_Drummond pointed out that the car is due for its A-Service due to its age, while @raykosh expressed concerns about the long duration without comprehensive service records. @jgoodacre1 raised questions about specific features of the car, like the massage seats and various amenities, which the seller confirmed to be included. Other commenters mentioned specific details they wish to see more information on, such as the car's tires and a build sheet.
Negative: Conversely, there were apprehensions regarding the high mileage for some potential buyers. @Fairmont663336 stated that the mileage was too high for their taste and opted out of considering the car. Additionally, @GDMCHRIZ raised concerns about whether the lack of significant service history might be a red flag, indicating potential maintenance issues. There were also inquiries about the last emissions test being conducted in 2017, hinting at possible underlying concerns related to the car's upkeep and readiness for buyers.
![]() |
