Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg describes the 1965 Shelby GT350 as a 'sensational classic' and 'absolutely stunning', while @HeyNk finds it 'super cool' that the car is in France, noting its uncommonness compared to how plentiful Mustangs are in the U.S. Positive sentiments also come from @RiffRaff, who recalls the nostalgic significance of cars like this from a local dealership increasingly known for performance cars. @BimmerVertDudeFTW jokes about wanting the car to come back to the U.S., suggesting confidence in its return. Likewise, @RiffRaff mentions a historic connection to Evel Knievel's motorcycle, further indicating the cultural impact associated with the vehicle's era.
Neutral: Several commenters discuss various logistical aspects regarding the vehicle's auction status, currency denotation, and import tariffs. @Haulgas brings up concerns about potential tariffs if the car returns to the U.S., while @douginoakville queries why the auction is denominated in Euros despite its location. @corvetteZL1 (The Seller) offers clarification on tax rates for cars over 25 years old. There are also exchanges about the vehicle's history, with @azcobra sharing insights about previous owners, which sheds light on the car's past but does not sway overly positive or negative opinions. Additionally, @Sredna comments on the implications of restoring parts versus preserving the original character of the car.
Negative: Concerns have surfaced regarding the car's authenticity and condition. @Shelby5 questions the seller's claim that 100% of the bodywork is original, pointing out instances of incongruence, such as the inclusion of non-original parts. @HG52 also highlights the potential tariff implications while expressing skepticism about the car's importation. Other commenters, such as @CobraKid and @Sredna, raise doubts about the vehicle's resting state, debating whether remaining parts of the car should be restored to maximize value or kept as-is for historical context. Overall, there is a palpable concern among certain commenters about the integrity of the vehicle's presentation in light of the auction.
 |
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ReimelMC (The Seller) presents the 1995 Ferrari F512M as an exceptional example with a remarkable history, including original books, tools, and correspondence from Ferrari. Commenters like @Chuck and @boaboyoz express admiration for the vehicle's style and aesthetics, highlighting it as a sensational specimen. @letthegypsyhaveit calls it the most beautiful Ferrari they have ever seen, while @meandmyredferrari appreciates its rarity, noting that two were recently sold with low mileage, suggesting that this one is likely to reach a high final bid. Overall, many express excitement over the car's design and the anticipation of its auction results.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions about the car's components, such as @Rapallo asking about tire date codes and @ReimelMC (The Seller) confirming these are the original tires but well maintained, demonstrating the car's originality. @LenV12 notes the high bidding price already reaching over $400K, asserting the similarities between the F512M and earlier Testarossa models while recognizing the iconic design of the Ferrari brand, which continues to capture attention. Information is shared about the car's mechanical upgrades by @ReimelMC (The Seller) to clarify the performance improvements compared to its predecessors, fostering a sense of community among enthusiasts.
Negative: While there appears to be a lot of positivity, @keyfobs expresses a critique regarding the appearance of the non-M variants, indicating a lesser allure, and @Wolfenhaus sarcastically observes the lack of motorized seatbelts, displaying a light-hearted skepticism towards some features. Additionally, @Rapallo humorously notes the consideration of 30-year-old tires being a potential concern for driving, hinting at a reservation about the car's usability given its age. Overall, while the comments lean positive, some do highlight practical concerns regarding the car's condition and features.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the stunning design and craftsmanship of the 1941 Cadillac Series 62 Convertible Coupe Resto Mod, with @DarioDude calling it 'flawless' and @Dallasdmytrow referring to it as 'timeless art.' @Oiram complimented the well-thought-out build, while @BigPlanDan found it to be a fantastic piece of art, only wanting to change the steering wheel color. @stugottz praised the updates made to the car's interior, finding the changes tasteful, and @Fuelieguy expressed love for everything about the vehicle, stating it was better than an all-restored original. Overall, the positive feedback highlights an appreciation for the blend of classic styling with modern drivability.
Neutral: Several commenters provided constructive feedback regarding the vehicle's dashboard and interior modifications. @Pennoak noted a desire for the original woodgrain finish, expressing concern about the updated gauges while still acknowledging the car's beauty. @denny6.53 shared a similar sentiment about preferring the original gauges but was pleased with the overall aesthetics, asking for specific details about the car’s motor and rear end ratio. Meanwhile, @59caddyman (The Seller) addressed these comments, asserting that the modernized dashboard received positive feedback in various settings and that it aligns with the car's overall tasteful build.
Negative: On the downside, some comments point to a few cosmetic issues and implications regarding the car's eligibility for shows. @cad58Y highlighted that the modification means the car is no longer eligible for major club touring, although @billyblyth humorously noted it remains a top choice for valet parking. Concerns were also raised by @Pennoak regarding a dent in the oil pan, though @59caddyman clarified it was purely cosmetic and did not affect performance, promising to replace it before auction conclusion. Other comments voiced worries about the quirks of modifications while being generally appreciative of the car's overall design and craftsmanship.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @mike_rockwell expressed a positive view on the vehicle's quality, indicating a preference for detailed builds and acknowledging the excellent engineering involved. @Powellforme also shared optimism, implying that the concerns over A/C and heat are overblown and suggesting he might acquire the car. @10510863 complimented the build and noted the investment made by the builder, implying a respect for the craftsmanship involved in creating the vehicle.
Neutral: The Seller, @Bedwards801, clarified that the A/C merely requires charging and the heater hoses need to be reconnected. He explained that these aspects were left unfinished by the previous owner, who had designed the car primarily for show purposes and had not prioritized functional driving. Additionally, @Iraceya inquired about the most extended drive taken in the vehicle, which @Bedwards801 responded to, indicating that its use has been very limited, primarily for show.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the unfinished state of the A/C and heating system, with @cad58Y questioning why these issues were not addressed, leading to speculation among potential buyers. @ivdjt highlighted practical considerations for licensing the vehicle, underscoring the need for specific features like wipers to comply with legal requirements, which might limit its usability. Overall, while the vehicle is praised for its appearance and build quality, the unresolved functional issues have created some skepticism amongst potential buyers.
|
1984 Ford Mustang GT 20th Anniversary Edition Convertible 5-Speed
1FABP27M0EF176548
Lot 196561
Private Party
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @NVGT350 mentioned that the vehicle looks really nice and expressed a desire for an '84 GT in Bright Copper Glow. @Mike_Breinin affirmed the aesthetics of the TRX repro wheels, mentioning that he was considering getting a set for his own car. Another commenter praised the upgrade from metric TRX wheels to the SAE 16" look-alikes, indicating that whoever recreated these wheels deserves accolades. Overall, many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance, particularly the wheels.
Neutral: @mpitman71 (The Seller) indicated that the original TRX wheels are available with the car purchase, though they need polishing and do not have tires. He also provided details about the vehicle's carburetor, stating it is a rebuilt Holley, and shared that the stereo is a retro sound system equipped with Bluetooth, while the original radio is also included. Additionally, he reassured potential buyers about the vehicle's condition, noting fresh fluid changes and safe driving over previous years.
Negative: @VolvoguyKC shared a humorous recollection that he mistakenly thought the vehicle had the Cleveland 351 CID engine, indicating a lack of accurate information about the car's specifications. There were inquiries about cold start and driving videos, suggesting some commenters' desire for more proof of the car's functionality. Additionally, @Highline9 sought further details about the stereo, tire date codes, and service records, highlighting potential concerns about the car's readiness for long-distance driving.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @shamu89 expressed strong enthusiasm for the vehicle, mentioning their previous ownership of the same model without the Saleen upgrade and highlighting its awesomeness. They also wished the best of luck to both buyers and sellers, reflecting a positive sentiment towards the car ad's details, specifically the mention of a center armrest, which they found noteworthy and deserving of a good outcome.
Neutral: @BlueOvalFan1 provided factual clarification regarding the vehicle's condition, specifically addressing concerns raised by potential buyers about the minor damage reported on the CarFax. They confirmed that the damage was from being keyed and indicated that the necessary repairs, including a new top in 2024 and a repaint, had been made, asserting that the Saleen is a very clean car overall.
Negative: @shamu89 commented on the lack of activity in the auction, noting their surprise that there were only two comments on this vehicle sale despite its condition and pricing. They compared it to a motorcycle listing that generated significantly more interest in a shorter time frame, suggesting potential issues with engagement or visibility of the Saleen listing that might affect the sale.
|
1998 Chevrolet Corvette Convertible Indy 500 Pace Car Edition
1G1YY32G9W5118768
Lot 196564
Private Party
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MichaelUSA (The Seller) describes the 1998 Corvette as a wonderful car, highlighting its driving experience, excellent seat comfort, and the effective performance of features like fog lights, sport seats, and improved suspension. The seller appreciates the unique purple pearl color, which has garnered positive attention at car meets, even with some believing it to be a repaint. The seller emphasizes that the wheels and interior are in good condition, and assures potential buyers that all original parts can be restored except for the decals, which are available from vendors.
Neutral: Commenters express mixed feelings about the car's transformation, with @Chasboy1 noting a general indifference towards pace car styling and suggesting that the car might not attract much interest due to its lack of original features. @beanerwi laments the loss of the car's collector status due to alterations, while others like @johnnyvett acknowledge that modifications were common at the time and share a personal preference for the car in its current form.
Negative: Several comments reflect disappointment over the vehicle's alterations, with @beanerwi questioning why a collector car was modified and @KatieKlean arguing that the changes removed its historical significance, rendering it an ordinary Corvette. Concerns are raised about a check engine light mentioned by @Jocko315, prompting @MichaelUSA (The Seller) to address it. The discussion of potential mechanical issues underscores the negative perception from some users about possible reliability problems or deterioration in value due to the modifications.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @2002WS6 appreciates the vehicle, noting that BMW built quality cars in this era. @DS53 expresses a liking for the color combination, which adds to the car's appeal. @Philliy, the seller, has provided detailed maintenance history, stating that extensive work was done at 48,770 miles, which assures potential buyers of the vehicle's condition and contributes positively to the sentiment around the car.
Neutral: @Willwill comments on the car's great shape, asking about the cooling system maintenance. @HG7011 inquires about the type of automatic transmission used, showing interest but not elevating the sentiment. @LAYoung and @Kbravender request videos of the top's operation, indicating a desire for visual confirmation of features but remaining neutral in tone. @Trivits asks multiple questions about the vehicle's components including the closure motor of the soft top, water pump, and belts, indicating a thorough assessment without expressing strong feelings either way.
Negative: @magguu expresses frustration about the vehicle being an automatic, signaling a personal preference against automatic transmissions. @Trivits appears somewhat critical by asking for clarification on maintenance items like the timing belt and valve cover gasket replacements, which may indicate concerns about the vehicle's upkeep. Overall, while most comments are gathered as positive or neutral, there are hints of apprehension from some parties about specific mechanical aspects.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @twobergs provides helpful information about the vehicle, specifically addressing concerns regarding the roof rack and retractable top. They mention the availability of a specific product link, which adds value to potential buyers looking for more details.
Neutral: Comments like those from @Carpro31 and @hopason express curiosity about the vehicle's features and inquire about videos or photos demonstrating its functionality. This indicates an interest in learning more about the vehicle's operating capabilities.
Negative: There are no negative comments present in this conversation, as all inquiries seem to be constructive and focus on understanding the vehicle better.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed appreciation for the 1996 Ford Bronco XLT Sport, with @Kidsixpack noting that clean examples of this Sport edition are rare and highly valued. @Tnbusiness71 (The Seller) highlighted the vehicle's strong capabilities, classic lines, and comfort features like captain's chairs and a JVC head unit, suggesting it is ready for adventure right away. @Dwc930 received confirmation from @Tnbusiness71 that the vehicle possesses a rust-free undercarriage, alluding to its well-preserved condition due to the mild climate of British Columbia, where it spent most of its life.
Neutral: The discussion included practical inquiries, with @Molae65 asking about specific features of the Sport model, specifically the tailgate design. In response, @Tnbusiness71 clarified that this model typically came with a painted tailgate, as opposed to a chrome panel. @Lildoug raised questions about the vehicle's eligibility for registration in California, receiving reassurance from @Tnbusiness71 about its prior emissions tests, indicating that the vehicle met strict regulatory standards in Canada which are similar to those in California.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by commenters such as @Ford512, who pointed out cosmetic discrepancies including improperly painted bumpers and missing factory elements. @Dwc930 sought a cold start and drive video to assess the vehicle's performance further, reflecting a level of caution typical among potential buyers. @BriantheCarGuy also inquired about tariffs for Canadian buyers, emphasizing a need for clarity amidst confusion regarding cross-border purchases, while @jsloden corrected another user about the airbag count, suggesting the vehicle only has one, potentially indicating a lack of modern safety features.
|
4,600-Mile 2003 Harley-Davidson Softail Deuce 100th Anniversary
1HD1JBB193Y041380
Lot 196569
Private Party
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters are praising the bike for its beautiful condition and riding comfort. @dklanecky1 expresses admiration for its upkeep, while @mo8ius regards the Deuce as one of the most attractive Harleys ever. @IMK67, who owns a similar model, adds to this by stating that it is the most comfortable ride, validating its appeal. The seller, @Tigerman1953, also contributes positively by sharing that he purchased the bike for personal enjoyment, showing his appreciation for it despite the unfortunate need to sell.
Neutral: There are several inquiries regarding the bike's specifics, with @MrC questioning whether the EFI was recalibrated for the installed exhaust, and he also asks about the tire date codes. In response, @Tigerman1953 confirms he will check on both the EFI adjustment and the tire dates, indicating his willingness to provide the information. Additional neutral comments include @0311Jarhead confirming that the bike has a clear title and @dalav8r asking about the seat height, which @Tigerman1953 specifies as 26 inches.
Negative: Some comments express doubt or concern regarding the motorcycle's price point. @petey677 finds it shocking to see a Harley listed for only $500, emphasizing that the price seems excessively low for such a vehicle. Overall, while there is interest in the bike, there is also skepticism about its valuation, raising questions about potential underlying issues with the sale.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TReynolds24 (The Seller) describes the motorcycle as a remarkable survivor in great shape for its age, having been acquired at the Barber Vintage Festival in 2022. He highlights its performance and aesthetics, noting the upgrades he made, such as new high gloss white plastics, a seat cover, and a new air filter. The seller emphasizes that he hopes the bike will go to someone who will either race it or restore it to museum quality, expressing his willingness to answer any inquiries about the bike, which enhances its appeal to potential buyers. Additionally, @yrhmblhst enthusiastically praises the motorcycle, stating, 'THIS is what a motorcycle should look like!' which indicates a strong positive reception to its appearance.
Neutral: @classyfellow comments on the high shipping costs associated with motorcycles, which limits his interest in purchasing the bike despite his acknowledgment of its quality. His message conveys a neutral stance, recognizing the motorcycle's merits while also expressing a practical concern that prevents him from pursuing the transaction. The seller's response, thanking @classyfellow and reaffirming the bike's quality, signifies an understanding of potential buyers' considerations without dismissing the motorcycle's value.
Negative: There are no explicit negative comments about the motorcycle. The concerns raised are centered around shipping costs, which are practical considerations rather than critiques of the bike itself. Overall, the feedback is primarily positive and neutral, with a lack of negative commentary regarding the motorcycle's quality or condition.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the impressive features of the truck, particularly its 7.4 liter engine, which some users, like @MHD1970 and @aedevito, confirm through various indicators such as the RPO code and fan belt sticker. @Gmmuscleusa also emphasizes that the aesthetic differences between the 7.4 and 5.7 engines are notable and unmistakable. Commenters appreciate the truck's overall condition, with @jbrown89 admiring its aesthetics, including the color and features such as the old man winch setup and aftermarket wheels. The seller, @Buddys503, is praised for the truck's performance and quality, reassuring potential buyers that everything, including the A/C and differential, works well, adding to the positive reception of the vehicle.
Neutral: The discussion around the vehicle also includes some requests for clarification on important details such as any leaks or functionality issues, as indicated by @WIZZZZ. The seller, @Buddys503, assured potential buyers that there are no leaks and that everything works properly. @bringatrailer confirmed that they have updated the listing with the correct engine size after a few commenters raised concerns, indicating a willingness to maintain transparency regarding the vehicle's specifications.
Negative: However, there were some negative undertones in the commentary about the seller's business practices. @pt70 raised alarms about the name change from Tony's Auto Sales to Buddy's Auto Sales, suggesting it may be linked to a history of complaints and dishonest practices. @Chipper55 echoed these concerns, showing appreciation for the awareness brought up by @pt70. This sentiment triggered a defensive response from @Buddys503, who downplayed the complaints while trying to affirm the positive reviews their business has received, suggesting a conflict of perception between potential buyers and the seller's reputation.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the exceptional aesthetics of the Porsche 911 C4S Cabriolet, particularly the color combination of Agate Gray with Carrera Red and the red soft top, denoted by @GDogg. @B.Fryk highlights the driving thrill of the 991.1 model while praising its beauty. @Ram3k shares a similar vehicle experience, appreciating the build quality of this model in comparison to earlier ones, further enhancing the positive sentiment around its overall appeal.
Neutral: Several inquiries are made regarding the car's specifications and maintenance history, indicating potential buyers' attentiveness to the car's condition. @Nizzore and @JGordon5454 ask detailed questions about tire depth measurements, maintenance items, and minor cosmetic features, demonstrating an interest in understanding the vehicle's upkeep. @JohnnyRRRR (The Seller) provides clarifications regarding the powered wind deflector and the reason for selling the vehicle after a short period of ownership, giving context that may impact buyer decisions.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns about the potential maintenance costs associated with the Porsche, particularly around tires, brakes, and general upkeep expenses. @JGordon5454 mentions that while tire costs might not be significant, brake replacements can be quite expensive, reflecting a possible deterrent for certain buyers. @bmwspyder raises a question about deferred maintenance, indicating that apprehensions about the car's condition might affect bidding interest.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @topduarte expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting it looks very nice and highlighted an interesting aspect of GM's design choices with different door handle colors. @DylanATucker conveyed a deep emotional attachment to the car, expressing a desire to take excellent care of it and engage in the necessary repairs, symbolizing a commitment to restoration. @VantageAuto (The Seller) also noted the vehicle had a full repaint and new tires, framing it as an opportunity for buyers looking for a project car with potential value.
Neutral: Several commenters reflected on the vehicle's condition and history, with @ForgetAboutItCuh raising questions about the previous paint refresh and specific issues such as the dash condition and mid-repair history of components like the headlamps. @newcarpro provided detailed vehicle specifications, reinforcing the informative aspect of the conversation. Additionally, @rfrankov compared their own similar car's condition to this one, suggesting the potential buyer consider the performance of various electrical components they encountered, emphasizing a practical perspective.
Negative: There were notable concerns regarding the vehicle's current state. @ForgetAboutItCuh mentioned worries about the corroded seals on the targa top and windows, suggesting possible leaks. @rfrankov pointed out visible paint drips and seat wear, questioning the vehicle's maintenance alongside potential hidden issues like a covered check engine light panel, which raised red flags for cautious prospective buyers. Overall, there were implications about the vehicle requiring extensive work and attention, which might deter those looking for a turn-key solution.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @rokokoro commented on the vehicle's appearance, stating it looks great and lamenting that it is not available in the US. Users such as @hobbsm3 and @BrokenAdam have shared positive experiences of riding in Alphas in Southeast Asia and Malaysia respectively, highlighting the luxurious ride experience and comfort. @Tnbusiness71 (The Seller) provided details about the vehicle's excellent maintenance and luxurious features, describing it as a go-to choice for executive transport in Japan and expressing excitement over its presentation.
Neutral: @David_P noted the vehicle's auxiliary mirror and its potential usefulness in providing visibility for parking, although expressed skepticism about its effectiveness. @YaAllah inquired about the import process to the US, while @Dlewp asked about the possibility of transferring, registering, or licensing the vehicle in the US. Additional inquiries provided clarification on vehicle dimensions compared to the Sienna, with @Tnbusiness71 (The Seller) explaining size differences and seating comfort of the Alphard.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the importation of the vehicle into the US due to its age and lack of necessary EPA/DOT certifications, as noted by @Dlewp and @YaAllah. @David_P also questioned the practicality of the auxiliary mirror setup. @Tnbusiness71 (The Seller) explained the complexities around federalization, suggesting that while some clients have navigated workarounds, risks remain about legal road use without proper compliance.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz praised the vehicle, calling the Issaquah Ford GT 68 Heritage Edition "an absolute knockout" and a "spectacular and stunning specimen." @GDogg highlighted its rarity, noting it's an "absolute sensational Heritage Edition" with only 50 made and just 47 miles on the clock. @sludgo expressed that regardless of the color and spec, it remains the "best looking hypercar" and commended Ford for their design, indicating admiration for the car's aesthetic qualities.
Neutral: @De3de8 showed curiosity about the roundel number choices when ordering, while @Mordecai provided clarification about the number 9 on the 2019 GT Heritage Edition, commemorating the 1968 Le Mans winner. @KICKINGTIRES inquired about the production details regarding roundel numbers, showing interest in the quantity produced for different models, while @nweuro (The Seller) provided a thorough description of the vehicle's specifications and history, confirming it retains its original features and was imported from Canada.
Negative: @porsche1986 commented on the car being beautiful but expressed a desire for a model with lower mileage, indicating a potential deterrent for some buyers. Additionally, @Steelman1952 requested a window sticker for the listing, hinting at a possible lack of transparency in the sale. @Sunbeamdon shared a regretful anecdote about having the chance to purchase a GT40 in the past, reflecting on missed opportunities and nostalgia around classic vehicles.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @cocomats describes the vehicle as 'all the sports car you'll ever need,' while @Gdaddy labels it as a 'very solid 914-6' along with praising its amazing repaint quality. @sludgo finds it 'perpetually underrated,' calling it one of the most fun cars he has driven. @mikeor appreciates the elegant and understated restoration, agreeing with @Jimmyblues1959 who finds it a tastefully done classic. @whipcity76 notes its dual utility as both a sports car and a practical vehicle, celebrating the fun and comfort it provides during drives, alongside a positive experience with its driving capabilities. @Caymanorcarrera and @Damaho912 also acknowledge the car's beauty despite some minor alterations.
Neutral: Comments from @kenshapiro2002 express that color choices in classic cars like this one can affect value, yet he recognizes the appeal of the unique color. @Jpfindlay mentions a longstanding desire for this car model due to its underrated nature. @MCShack pinpoints some modifications and appreciates the upgrades made on the vehicle, while expressing personal preference for the original Irish Green color. @dave292 raises questions regarding the car's title and model year, while @longforlineup queries the originality of the engine. @RosnerMotorsports (The Seller) helps clarify several questions from potential buyers, showing an active engagement to ensure transparency.
Negative: However, several concerns have been noted about the car's condition. @rht69911s recounts a past driving experience where a rear caliper was leaking, leading to apprehension due to the mismatched appearance of the calipers. They also point out a small paint flaw that remains. @dr914 emphasizes the need for clarification on the car's modifications and suggests additional details on specific structural elements should be provided. Meanwhile, @volvoguyKC critiques the vehicle's driving video, calling it one of the 'most disappointing' he has seen, which could impact perceptions of the car's performance. Overall, while many praise the aesthetic and functional aspects, some potential buyers express hesitation due to uncertainty about the car's history and minor issues.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the Volvo wagon, highlighting its beauty and practicality. @wh400 appreciates its aesthetics and expresses interest in bidding if they were in the market. @nednash confirms the impressive highway fuel economy of up to 40 mpg, calling it one of their favorite Volvos. Overall, there is a shared sentiment of nostalgia and appreciation for the traditional wagon style, particularly as the market shifts towards SUVs.
Neutral: The seller, @Chris_F, provides detailed responses to inquiries about the vehicle, including information on tire replacements, service records, and the status of the vehicle as a non-smoker car. They note that the car has been consistently serviced at a local Volvo dealership and share specifics about handling the sale process for out-of-state buyers. Comments from others inquire about the vehicle's owner’s manual and key fobs, indicating general interest in the completeness of the offer.
Negative: Concerns about the declining availability of high-end wagons are noted by @111r, who reflects on the lack of reasonably priced models in the market. @choochootrain raises a question about potential expensive A/C issues, seeking confirmation on the vehicle's service history regarding this concern. The overall sentiment is that while the vehicle is appealing, there are underlying issues in the market regarding wagon availability and potential maintenance concerns that some buyers may consider.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @1098s312rMIKE praised the vehicle's engine bay and undersides, calling them very clean. @bpeverest echoed this sentiment, highlighting the attractive color and wheel combination which he described as period-correct. He noted the appeal of the chrome, calling it attractive in today's context and remarked positively on the car's daily driving capabilities due to its dual-row chain.
Neutral: @japashby inquired about the positioning of the Mercedes star in the steering wheel, expressing concern about it being upside down. @driftmotion (The Seller) confirmed it was indeed upside down, likely due to past repairs. He also assured @japashby that the car had been smogged recently, addressing another potential concern for in-state buyers.
Negative: @str8tth raised questions about the vehicle's AC, noting that thermal photos only showed a 15-20 degree temperature drop, which may not be sufficient. He asked for more evidence regarding a vinyl separation issue he suspected. Additionally, @ronschoelkopf inquired about any potential rust, indicating concerns about the car's condition despite being kept in Southern California all its life.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @LarryMeyers (The Seller) highlights the truck's excellent condition, noting that it has zero rust due to treatments applied to the underside. He mentions that the truck was a gift, and after receiving it, numerous maintenance tasks were performed, including the replacement of the timing belt and water pump. @wareaglebrett praises the Hilux for its dexterity and dependability, adding that it's a remarkable example.
Neutral: Several commenters seek additional information, with @darragh808 inquiring about when the timing belt was changed, and @JoeMommia asking about the steering wheel and column. @Greenpump provides insight into the steering column issue, noting that it's not uncommon for Hiluxes. @Sivley expresses interest in more media content of the truck, prompting @LarryMeyers to agree to create a cold start and walkaround video soon.
Negative: @Kizarsoza jokingly asks if he can have @WhistlinDiesel take the truck for a test drive, a reference to an online personality known for reckless driving. @LarryMeyers (The Seller) expresses confusion over the identity of @WhistlinDiesel, suggesting he associates them with dangerous behavior. He humorously notes that he would prefer to avoid a test drive to ensure the truck's longevity after watching a durability test.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters collectively praise the beauty and engineering of the Jaguar F-Type R Coupe, highlighting its design and driving performance. @SDCR remarks on the impressive nature of the car, noting the blend of aesthetics and special qualities that make it stand out. @FirehouseVintage mentions the powerful engine, hydraulic steering, and overall muscle car appeal, reflecting enthusiasm about offering the vehicle to the community and inviting discussions. @Noisycow shares personal joy from owning a similar model and appreciates its clean lines and positive reactions from others while driving it, thus emphasizing the emotional connection this car fosters with its owners.
Neutral: Several commenters seek additional information regarding vehicle history and service records. @ProcrastiN8 and @CD72 express interest in the car's service history, indicating that potential buyers are looking for transparency before making a purchase. @Speedglas raises questions about the leg room, to which @pjanx offers his personal experience fitting comfortably in the vehicle, enriching the conversation about practical user experiences with the F-Type.
Negative: Some comments reveal concern about Jaguar's current trajectory, with @CarFoolLane expressing disappointment over the brand's focus shift toward electric SUVs and nostalgia for their past models. @Macphisto13 inquires about prior damage to the car, signaling a level of caution potential buyers may have regarding the vehicle's history. @Nomad90’s question about specific repair records highlights a worry about potential issues without documentation, which could affect buyer confidence.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed much admiration for the Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder, praising its stylish design and appealing features. @boaboyoz highlighted its incredible style and enthusiastic prospects for the auction, while @Feo1 reminisced about the emotional connection and driving experience of a gated Gallardo, noting its well-cared status. The aesthetic appeal of the vehicle's interior, particularly its unique red carpet, was emphasized, with @clwarkentin stating that driving this car offers a "Red Carpet" experience and @DOWORK1 acknowledging the lovely specifications and remarkable driving experience.
Neutral: Several comments included logistical inquiries and confirmations about the vehicle's features. @Noahyjohn posed questions on the convertible top functionality, axle lift specifications, and service history with the seller, who promptly provided answers and confirmed the factory features of the car. @rosica raised inquiries about any previous inspections, operational systems like the AC, and potential evidence of paintwork, receiving assurance from the seller regarding the car's operational status and a completed in-house inspection.
Negative: There were few negative comments, but one humorous remark from @Mr_Berater questioned unconventional payment methods, reflecting a light-hearted skepticism about affordability, while another commenter noted the 'interesting' choice of red carpet without elaborating further. @casejam expressed some frustration over having to choose between selling their MKIV Supra or opting for the Gallardo, highlighting the challenges faced when making such a significant purchase decision.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its color combination and aesthetic appeal. @Bforlife mentioned their love for the color combo, while @nickgurdian felt a strong desire to own the car. @lovecars remarked on the steering wheel, linking it to good memories with their past Alfa, and @49miledriver noted that pictures of the car made it seem far more desirable than the initial description suggested. Overall, there was an evident enthusiasm for the GTV6's design and driving pleasure, as @gregorylv reminisced about their own experiences with an Alfetta and the joy of driving.
Neutral: The seller, @MasonTVM, provided several updates regarding the vehicle, including its history and condition, which generated further questions from prospective bidders. The auction process was described as enjoyable, with the seller welcoming inquiries and promising transparency about the vehicle's features and any necessary documentation, like the missing invoice noted by @Lomax. There were also technical discussions among users, particularly concerning the transaxle mounts and rear subframe shims, with @Zinhead clarifying misconceptions about the vehicle's setup. More practical details about the AC system were discussed, revealing some concerns but also efforts by the seller to address these issues.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle’s condition, particularly regarding the AC system, with @OttoB inquiring about its functionality after conversion to 134a and warning that it may not perform as expected. @sodon10 asked critical questions about the transmission replacement, including any grinding noises and the possibility of a walk-around video to inspect for smoke during start-up. Additionally, @benn expressed skepticism about the 700 miles driven since significant work was done, suggesting that the maintenance history and components removed from the car might be of interest to potential buyers. Overall, some comments reflected doubt about the vehicle’s maintenance and whether it would meet the expectations of bidders.
|
73k-Kilometer Japanese-Market 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 Avantgarde Wagon
WDB2112701A855728
Lot 196678
Dealer
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 wagon, highlighting its elegant design and performance features. @Stuttgart_Steel mentioned feeling jealous that other markets got the E500 wagon in RWD, indicating its desirability. @Z4ish complimented the car's specifications and noted that if it were offered in a manual option, it would be perfect, showcasing a general admiration for the model. @Tnbusiness71 (The Seller) emphasized the vehicle's luxurious features, such as the smooth driving experience, spacious interior, and high-quality sound system, appealing to buyers looking for a versatile, collectible luxury vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed the vehicle's eligibility for registration in the U.S., showing varying opinions on the import regulations. @magujia inquired about registering it in the U.S., while @SockPuppet and @Craigger debated the specifics of U.S. import laws regarding the vehicle's history and federalization process. @Craigger acknowledged new insights on the matter, which suggests that while the community engages in technical discussions, there is a shared recognition of the complex legalities surrounding the car's importation.
Negative: Some comments revealed concerns about the limitations of importing the E500 into the U.S. due to lacking EPA stickers and federalization requirements. @SockPuppet clarified these obstacles, arguing that vehicles not originally sold in the U.S. must be 25 years old to be imported, which raised doubts among potential buyers. @Boatymcboatface expressed disappointment regarding the discontinuation of the E500 wagon in the U.S. market and lamented the challenges in obtaining such vehicles from Europe, suggesting that despite the vehicle's appeal, regulatory issues could hinder interest.
|
2017 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter Airstream Interstate 24GL Tommy Bahama Relax Edition
WDAPF4CD1HP570209
Lot 196679
Private Party
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Seaate20 praises the vehicle as a perfect camper for 1-2 people and an excellent transport option for 8-9 individuals, highlighting its usefulness for family events. @D90LE_001of300 appreciates the VB Air Suspension system, noting it greatly improves handling while driving, especially in challenging conditions. Furthermore, @sawbonesdriver71 emphasizes confidence in the vehicle's service and reliability, mentioning its recent maintenance and the addition of a solar charging system.
Neutral: @sawbonesdriver71 clarifies the confusion regarding the year of the vehicle, explaining the relationship between the Airstream model year and the Mercedes chassis year. The seller responds to various inquiries about the vehicle's dimensions, service history, and towing capacity, providing transparent details to prospective buyers. Multiple commenters inquire about specific repairs and maintenance history, indicating a collective interest in the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @dpom75 questions whether the failing rear air shocks were repaired, to which @sawbonesdriver71 explains the shocks are functioning well but acknowledges some minor concerns. @Piantanida expresses apprehension regarding the condition of the existing shocks, suggesting the need for Airstream for any repairs. @Seaate20 shares their experience of garage height limitations, indicating difficulty fitting the vehicle, which highlights potential issues for buyers with similar constraints.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Oldhockyplayr expressed strong admiration for the G35 coupe, highlighting that it remains one of their favorite cars after owning many classic vehicles, praising its appearance, sound, ease of maintenance, and driving experience. @Arinepon commented on the exceptional condition of the front seats, calling it the best they have seen and indicating the car is worth every penny for those seeking a high-quality example of the 03/04 G35. Additionally, @mr_smee shared a positive experience with the vehicle's nimbleness and V6 performance, noting that they were impressed after driving one.
Neutral: @VantageAuto (The Seller) addressed concerns from @eddtur regarding rust, assuring that there are only minor surface rust spots and that the previous owner took great care of the car, which had never been driven in harsh winter conditions. @KrisA noted that while the fuel pump and window motors have a tendency to wear out, the G35 is still a solid platform for driving in various weather conditions. @pippen99 reminisced about their G35 ownership, mentioning some issues with the clutch, seat assemblies, and window regulators, but still championing the car as a fun driving experience.
Negative: @eddtur requested more detailed documentation of the car's underbody to check for rust, indicating some apprehension about its condition. @TexasBear recalled problems with foggy headlight assemblies, which they faced with their previous four-door version. @DerbyBoy inquired about a cigarette lighter and input ports for the radio, suggesting a potential concern about the car's modern usability, while @f_o_o also requested pictures of specific parts of the vehicle.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TransAmDrifter expressed excitement upon seeing the Pontiac 1000, stating that it has become cool because it still exists. @MPreston454 shared nostalgic feelings about the car, mentioning that it served its purpose as a practical and economical vehicle during its era, and @robbiefarmer referred to it as a sweet ride. Several comments highlighted the car’s ability to evoke fond memories of simpler times and driving education experiences. @MyDirtIsRed humorously considered buying it to gift to his son on his 16th birthday, showcasing an emotional connection to the vehicle, while @Craven and @CaptainMyCaptain made light-hearted comparisons that further illustrated their affection for quirky cars like this one.
Neutral: Comments about its design and purpose were mixed. @GravityFeed referenced a detailed review of the Pontiac 1000 from MotorWeek which highlighted its slow acceleration, while @David_P compared it unfavorably to the Toyota Corolla FX16 from the same era. @jka73 clarified that the Pontiac 1000 was often confused with the T-1000 designation and provided historical context about its lineage tied to the Chevette. Several commenters noted this vehicle’s status as a basic economic car, suitable for beginners but not one to be held onto for long, embodying the practicalities of the 1980s automotive market.
Negative: Criticism was aimed at the vehicle's performance and reliability. @0die mockingly called it a rebadged Chevette, while @HeavyTank77 remarked that, despite its charm, the Pontiac 1000 was truly awful compared to competing cars from 1987. @momoneythanbrains admitted to its forgettable nature while reminiscing about its diesel version. @Formulamess recounted a troublesome experience with a version of the car, emphasizing its poor reliability. Furthermore, @CaptainMyCaptain humorously described the car's attributes, acknowledging its shortcomings but also its uniquely endearing qualities, indicating a bitter-sweet affection mixed with outright mockery.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @scuzzisquadrecorse expressed sheer delight with their recent purchase of a similar vehicle, noting that while they may not be the fastest cars, they offer a lot of enjoyment behind the wheel. Others also shared their appreciation for this classic, citing it as an iconic example of the 80's hot hatch period. @EBF4312 and @mick59 wished the seller good luck, reinforcing the car's reputation as a beloved model among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several users showed interest in the vehicle’s history and updates since its previous auction. @repoman69 and @ettegrub both inquired about any changes made to the car since its previous sale, while @Flared_Fenders (The Seller) provided some insights regarding the condition of the vehicle, including minor cosmetic issues and mechanical repairs made during ownership, such as oil changes and the replacement of the battery. @Mansi wanted to know about the registration process in California, highlighting that questions about the car's compliance could be a factor for potential buyers.
Negative: @Flared_Fenders (The Seller) was candid about the car's imperfections, discussing the rust and the fact that it is not in perfect condition. Acknowledgment of past accidents and theft history further added a layer of concern for buyers. Despite these issues, some like @ib356c remarked that the car looks amazing but urged prompt attention to the rust spots, suggesting that while the vehicle holds potential, it does require attention and care to maintain.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg praises the vehicle for its good looks, particularly noting the appealing Houndstooth interior. @TheLuxAuto (The Seller) confirmed that the Cayenne Turbo Coupe has an air suspension and provided an update on the service records, which adds value to the listing.
Neutral: @Mrbeyer1 inquires about the panoramic sunroof and the controls for exhaust note and sport modes. @lossy comments that the Cayennes don't have dedicated exhaust switches, explaining how they are controlled instead. @911heaven48 asks for clarification about the color of the rims due to varying appearances in photos, indicating the need for more consistent visual information.
Negative: @dangramm raises concerns about potential brake issues, asking if there are any noises or problems. @Markus99 mentions that the Houndstooth seat option likely does not include ventilated seats, which is crucial information for buyers in hotter climates like Texas. @Alphak25 questions whether the smoker's package implies that the vehicle has been smoked in, highlighting concerns regarding the car's condition.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Accobra88 (The Seller) has provided detailed information about the vehicle, highlighting its strong performance with a dyno reading of 513 hp and a new fuel cell worth $3,800. He mentions that he has invested a significant amount of money into the car, totaling around $60k, indicating that it is well-built and of good quality. Several commenters, including @Randy53 and @RichB427, express admiration for the car, acknowledging that it is an impressive piece of machinery and recognizing the financial commitment involved in building such a vehicle.
Neutral: There are several inquiries about the car's specifications, such as whether it can be made street-legal and queries regarding its racing history and condition. @rees2 asks if the car can be registered, while other users like @Crustybucket and @_CJ discuss regulations regarding titles and registrations. @Number_2 and @ES122 ask technical questions about the engine and parts, which indicates an interest in understanding the vehicle's potential performance and mechanical condition, seeking clarity on aspects like fuel systems and engine mounts.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about the car's legality for street use, especially regarding the lack of a title and registration as noted by @DaleCarter1021 and others. @kevinckb6 humorously mentions that driving it around the neighborhood might land someone in jail, while @eight_bit_micro highlights the impracticality of turning a race car into a street vehicle due to its loud nature and lack of standard features. Additionally, there are worries about potential maintenance needs, as @Number_2 questions the engine's service requirement and @ES122 probes into the log book for any crash history.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Raffi praises the vehicle for its ambitious build, striking colors, and quality workmanship, especially highlighting the excellence of the front and rear suspension as well as the pristine condition of the underside. The combination of vintage and modern elements, particularly with the Hellcat engine, is celebrated, and he offers huge props to the build team. @CarProblem calls it a beautiful car with an amazing build, and @W4dww describes it as an absolutely beautiful beast, suggesting it might go for higher than anticipated. @Jerasimo (The Seller) answers queries about the vehicle’s components and performance, indicating new tires and that everything is functional, which enhances the car's appeal.
Neutral: @parshooter appreciates the beauty of the car but suggests removing the Hellcat fender badges for a stealthier look. @AZSkye expresses admiration for the modern "guts" beneath a vintage exterior and is curious about the build details, while @EddieWin asks for specifics about horsepower and torque, showing engagement with the car's performance aspects. @Royce59 remarks on the tight fit of components and mentions the car's driving in rain, reflecting on its practicality.
Negative: @surfdog raises concerns about the lack of air conditioning, while @RCCLARKE82 warns that the tires might not withstand the immense power, suggesting potential upgrades. @Royce59 and @60BHD question the car's launch capabilities, indicating a possible need for tire adjustments to handle the power effectively. @dougbrown states that driving a car of this caliber in the rain is unfortunate, which suggests a sentiment that the build should be treated with more care.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the Volkswagen Touareg's strong points, such as its beautiful off-road Gray Metallic finish and impressive features like all-wheel drive, heated seats, and a Kenwood touchscreen stereo with navigation. @aegmotorsports shared detailed descriptions of the vehicle's specifications, including the robust 3.2L VR6 engine and its well-documented service history, which has garnered interest from potential buyers. Commenters like @VolvoguyKC complemented the car by referring to it as the one that helped Porsche, adding to the positive sentiment surrounding its reputation and performance.
Neutral: @Terry2 inquired about the resolution of issues related to the check engine light and choppy idle, to which @aegmotorsports clarified that new brake booster lines were installed, resolving those concerns effectively. Another commenter, @LSU2020, raised questions about potential gearbox or electrical issues, receiving confirmation from @aegmotorsports that all systems were functioning properly, ensuring buyers of the vehicle's reliability. Other inquiries regarding the vehicle's interior condition were met with explanations regarding the common cosmetic issues faced by VW vehicles of this vintage, suggesting that these concerns are not uncommon and can be easily remedied.
Negative: Some comments brought up concerns about the vehicle's interior, specifically regarding the sagging upholstery on the roof and doors. @Art13 questioned why this issue had not been addressed, but @aegmotorsports explained that this is a common problem with Touaregs and is primarily cosmetic, stating that it can be fixed with minor effort. The concern about a small water leak and the impact it might have on the headliner was also mentioned, which could detract from the overall perception of the vehicle's maintenance and care. Overall, while there are strong positive aspects highlighted in the comments, concerns about aesthetic issues and potential maintenance have been noted.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Tirefriar commented that the Alazzurra 650 SS is a beautiful bike, mentioning the rarity of the lower fairings. @rofandofy praised it as a rare bike with great components. @Nicola2.5 (The Seller) noted that the bike is wonderful to own and has performed flawlessly after some initial maintenance, indicating it is easy to start and ride. @Nicola2.5 (The Seller) also revealed they found older service records that could provide valuable information to potential buyers, which demonstrates the bike's history and care.
Neutral: @Nicola2.5 (The Seller) affirmed the bike can be ridden without the SS fairings for a different aesthetic. @beancounter64 remarked on the non-stock color of the bike and inquired about the airbox and service receipts for timing belts. It was confirmed by @Nicola2.5 (The Seller) that there is no original airbox available with the bike, but the timing belts were inspected and considered to be in good condition without receipts provided for their maintenance.
Negative: @beancounter64 questioned the authenticity of the bike's modifications, implying concern about the color and missing components such as the original airbox. Some uncertainty remains regarding the bike's past ownership, as @XR750 queried whether it was once owned by a well-known figure, to which @Nicola2.5 (The Seller) could only confirm knowledge of the last three owners, leaving potential buyers with unanswered questions about its provenance.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @monsoon725 shared fond memories, stating they loved their Z32 during college in 2000. @HNJrcars14 echoed similar sentiments, noting they had the same car in the exact color and wished they had the funds to purchase it now. @Jbjerke also reminisced, mentioning they owned the same car in the early 90s and expressed nostalgia for the car's interiors and cloth seats.
Neutral: @hankzweb complimented the Z32's appearance, identifying the paint color as Cherry Red Pearl and wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @jimdiesel4, the seller, acknowledged a question from @Lexoma regarding the maintenance of the vehicle, specifically the timing belt and water pump, stating that they were in fine condition according to their mechanic. @Lexoma noted their prior ownership of similar models and underscored the recommended service intervals, mentioning their ongoing interest in the car.
Negative: @Cesium137 pointed out some concerns about the vehicle, such as the non-factory placement of the power transistor unit and the fact that two of the wheels were installed incorrectly. They suggested replacing the fuel injectors and emphasized the importance of inspecting the timing chain and cam/crank seals for leaks. @Donaldson raised an issue regarding the wear of the paint protection on the wheel arch, noting a color discrepancy that initially should have been black.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praise the stunning aesthetics of the 2019 Ferrari 488 Spider, particularly its eye-catching Giallo Triple Strato color. @GDogg describes the combination of the vibrant paint and the Giallo stitching as sensational, while @Luits calls it the "HOLY GRAIL" of the 488 Spiders, highlighting the incredible spec. @carappassionato even claims it to be the best 488 spider they have ever seen, emphasizing that the original owner made excellent choices in the car's design. Others, like @lasik1, express a personal dream to own such a beautiful car and color. The seller also elaborates on the impressive features of the vehicle, stating that it has a pristine condition both cosmetically and mechanically, enhanced by options like carbon fiber trim and a front-axle lift.
Neutral: Questions regarding specific details about the vehicle have been brought up by various commenters, such as @CarGuyTexas911 inquiring about the expiration of the 7-year Ferrari service plan. @youngmotorcars (The Seller) responds promptly, confirming they will provide the requested information. @CarGuyTexas911 later finds the expiration date and shares it with the group, noting the car's Power 15 extended warranty situation as well. @Kash4cash and @AstroSpace also seek clarification regarding the car's location and the window tint, which @youngmotorcars confirms to have already been addressed in the listing.
Negative: While overall reception is positive, a few commenters raise concerns. @White20 inquires whether paint protection is included, and there seems to be slight confusion, prompting @Luits to clarify that paint protection film has indeed been applied to the entire exterior. Additionally, @lasik1 mentions that while the car is a dream, it may be financially out of reach for him compared to his current vehicle. The overall tone is mostly enthusiastic, but these minor concerns highlight the due diligence potential buyers are undertaking before bidding.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Thesunisrising expressed excitement for the CT, describing it as wonderful and a great bike for urban riding. @overlandish praised the restoration of the bike and highlighted its fun, lightweight nature, making it ideal for urban traffic. @Carth recalled owning a similar model, labeling it as indestructible with excellent low-end power, reflecting positively on its trail biking capabilities. Additionally, @dodahman shared nostalgic memories of using one in college, noting its fuel efficiency and fun driving experiences, indicating that someone would surely appreciate this bike.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the practical aspects of the bike, including its legal requirements. @LW57 pointed out that it would require a turn signal package for street legality, while @hawkins501 clarified that the bikes were factory-made without turn signals and were street legal as is. The seller, @knack, confirmed the simplicity of adding a turn signal package and mentioned the existing wiring for this addition, suggesting that the bike had options for customization to meet different riding needs.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the bike's design elements. @analogautosport warned about the non-folding buddy pegs being potentially hazardous, asserting that they could cause injury. Moreover, @analogautosport pointed out the original exhaust's condition, claiming it was in poor shape and noting that they could not find original replacements promptly. @Gary_Roofer suggested that hand signals could suffice instead of turn signals, implying that these could serve as adequate alternatives for riding safety.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @mlesko73 praised the vehicle as a very nice example of the CS, appreciating the color both inside and out. @funkaholik also echoed excitement about the color scheme of the car, stating that it looks great with the black GT/CS accents. @67air highlighted the color combo as fantastic and wished the seller luck with the sale, also sharing a personal experience of owning a similar model that he enjoys. @fourredsdr expressed interest in the auction and also mentioned the rarity of the Cal Specials compared to their Shelby counterparts, indicating enthusiasm for classic cars.
Neutral: @CPEZ28 (The Seller) responded to various inquiries about the condition of the car, stating it is rust-free and promising to provide additional undercar photos. He acknowledged concerns regarding some areas that looked like potential defects and clarified that they may be paint issues rather than dents or rust. He provided context about the history of the car, including details about its original sale, and addressed comments on the vehicle's undercarriage and mechanical condition with videos.
Negative: @platnumheart666 raised concerns about a dent and paint issues seen in the walkaround video, asking for clearer photos. He also questioned some oil presence in the garage and the appearance of smoke when the engine was running, seeking further clarity on the vehicle's condition. @IHateCars asked for specifics on the car's paint history, expressing concern over whether it had undergone a full repaint or just repairs, indicating a need for more transparency regarding the vehicle's restoration.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments highlight the stunning visual appeal of the 2021 Aston Martin DBX, with @GDogg praising the combination of Divine Red and AML Special Sahara Tan interior as absolutely sensational. @newcarpro is appreciative of the beautiful color scheme and the unique two-tone wheels, while @Eric997 finds the color combo nicely executed. @Pace_Adorno compliments the sophisticated and elegant design, emphasizing how well the design elements come together to create an exceptional vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @DBX-LA, provides thorough information about the DBX, sharing details about the car's bespoke build, maintenance, and features. The seller clarifies that the car has been a single owner, which explains the two owners noted on Carfax due to a transfer to a trust. The conversation includes questions regarding the color's appearance and the Black Pack Upper option, indicating potential buyer curiosity about the vehicle's specifications.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns, such as @topshoe mentioning that the car appears to be riding a bit high, while @DB6 questions the clarity of the service record pictures and the ownership details on Carfax. Additionally, @chicken.dinner.winner received flags for their non-constructive commentary. There is a slight imbalance between enthusiastic remarks and practical inquiries or concerns, which could affect buyers' perceptions.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @RonW reminisced about his own Black on Black ’05 S4, calling it the best road trip automobile, especially with the top down. He congratulated the next owner and wished them good luck with the sale. @DanRoark (The Seller) echoed Ron’s sentiments, highlighting the sweet sound of a normally aspirated V8 engine. The excitement around the car is palpable, with Dan noting that the 2004 Audi S4 Cabriolet has been his dream car, still in outstanding condition with under 15,000 original miles and garage-kept since day one.
Neutral: @DanRoark (The Seller) provided additional details about the car, mentioning it has a full size spare and a ski sack, emphasizing its unique features. He also noted that the car has a few carefully chosen upgrades while still maintaining the stock spirit of the S4. Communication with potential buyers is active, with @BaldOG asking about the condition of the roof liner and @KMBCARS inquiring about the front bumper's configuration. Dan responded promptly to each query, ensuring that interested parties had the information they needed.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by commenters regarding the car's condition. @Nickyboi pointed out a widening seam gap between the hood and the grille, questioning whether it was due to a bent hood or replacement of the bumper cover. Dan acknowledged the issue and explained that the seam is a design flaw of the grille surround, indicating that the original grille/surround is included with the car and could be swapped out. These concerns highlight potential flaws that might need addressing for buyers.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Mikeb57 commented on the beauty of the vehicle, recalling his fondness for similar models from the 70s. @mike_rockwell praised the unique color combination and expressed interest in the functionality of the 8-track player, highlighting the car's distinctive features. @BubbaGPZ1100 appreciated the seller's honest engagement, noting the car's appeal as a great cruiser and potential show car. @DrDick also acknowledged the car's aesthetic appeal, particularly the subtle color combination, while expressing interest in its exhaust system.
Neutral: @Duamy noted the car's non-matching numbers and inquired about specific aspects like the factory intake. The seller, @AEGonza, clarified various features and provided additional information about the engine and carburetor setup. Others, such as @Rhya and @Keef K, asked for more pictures and clarification about the car's condition, suggesting that more comprehensive visuals could aid potential buyers.
Negative: Though there were positive comments, some users expressed concerns. @Harleyrules raised questions about the heater core being bypassed, and @39mercman pointed out what seemed to be missing parts in the photos. @Duamy lamented the non-original motor and questioned why certain original parts were not included, reflecting skepticism among some potential buyers. @davek1661 also expressed uncertainty regarding the value of the car given its aftermarket modifications, indicating that it might not appeal to strict purists.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have praised the bike's aesthetic appeal, noting that a red bike is particularly attractive, and that even a touch of black would work well. @air4sale80 highlighted its good looks while @vectorbug referred to it as a 'hidden gem' like classic sports cars, capable of handling upgrades that enhance its performance. @Arekusan shared a positive personal history with the bike, attesting to its original condition and collectible value, which adds to its desirability and charm, while @GuzziV50 (The Seller) expressed confidence in the bike's pristine state and offered extensive details about its history and included accessories.
Neutral: Several comments contain factual information or inquiries about the vehicle, with @GuzziV50 (The Seller) providing specifics, such as the bike's original parts, unblemished tank condition, and clarity for potential buyers about viewing arrangements. There was also mention of the bike's handling at various speeds and its original aspects that can be restored, including the front fender and side cover, by GuzziV50, who indicated readiness to assist further on shipping and additional parts. @georganic raised an interesting technical question about the potential upgrade of the engine kit, showcasing a technical interest among the commenters.
Negative: Some concerns were noted regarding performance quirks, with @LarryP mentioning the potential for blue smoke upon startup, while @WRG1964 recalled a frustrating experience with the carburetor and its tendency to dump fuel, reflecting on past issues with a similar model. Additionally, @air4sale80 worried about potential bidding wars that might exceed his budget by the auction's end, hinting at financial concerns associated with the bike's appealing nature.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its nostalgic value. @nld1966 expresses an eagerness to potentially bid on the car, reminiscing about owning a similar model in the past. @JaMopar describes it as a 'gorgeous' car, remarking that it was atop their 'Dream Cars' list for years. Additionally, @bklyn46 mentions being a fan of these often-overlooked vehicles, praising their simplicity and charm.
Neutral: @Pa42 (The Seller) addresses various inquiries from potential buyers, sharing specifics about the vehicle's features and recent maintenance work. They confirm that the A/C functions well, the turbo has been fully refurbished, and the car has a new top installed. The seller further notes that all factory features are operational and provides details of the service history, implying a well-maintained vehicle. There are some discussions regarding the stereo system and paint work, showcasing a willingness to provide detailed information.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the vehicle's condition and history. @nld1966 asks about potential previous paint work and whether the vehicle still retains the original sound system, while @WILSONJ notes an unusual frequency of oil changes based on the Carfax report. @classickcarbuyer inquires about possible discrepancies regarding paint lines. Overall, while there are affirmations about the car's quality, some buyers seem skeptical and are seeking more clarity on its condition.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @mick59 praised the Ranger for its fine condition and noted the added benefit of its 5-speed transmission, stating that it remains relevant in today’s market. @hittelbk described the truck as beautiful and was impressed by its overall appearance. @CDehne remarked that the vehicle is a great example of the small pickup truck segment, appreciating the simplicity and size compared to larger, more complex modern vehicles. The Seller (@testdummypilot) emphasized transparency throughout the purchasing process, ensuring that potential buyers could view extensive images and videos to verify the vehicle's condition. They also provided a free warranty for the new owner, which reassured bidders about reliability.
Neutral: Several bidders expressed interest in the truck but raised concerns regarding the older tires. @hittelbk mentioned the age of the tires and how it raised concerns for lengthy drives home, while @HarryTasker76 echoed this sentiment, stating that it is a pet peeve for them as it relates to safety. The Seller responded to these comments, explaining their choice to keep the original tires for authenticity but also offering to replace them at cost if needed, demonstrating a willingness to accommodate buyer concerns. There was also a discussion about the bidding habits on BaT, where @stevehoog06 questioned the legitimacy of the process, but the Seller reassured them that the bidding history can vary greatly from auction to auction.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the legitimacy of the auction process, particularly by @stevehoog06, who questioned the bidding history. @HarryTasker76 also speculated about potential issues with bidding, indicating a lack of confidence in the auction system. These comments suggest some unease among potential buyers about the auction's credibility, which the Seller attempts to mitigate through their detailed explanations and reassurances about the bidding process. Despite the positive aspects highlighted about the truck's condition and the helpfulness of the Seller, the lingering doubts from some bidders may affect the overall perception of the auction.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @C_Lmotorsllc (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a great looking and great running truck that has been in one family since it was bought new. The story shared adds sentimental value, highlighting its history and low mileage, which appeals to buyers looking for a well-maintained vehicle. The seller encourages potential buyers to reach out for any questions or additional information, which creates a welcoming atmosphere.
Neutral: @changedriven points out some minor issues with the truck, specifically dings and dents on the tailgate, and requests better close-up images, indicating they seek transparency about the vehicle's condition. @C_Lmotorsllc (The Seller) acknowledges this request and commits to providing more images, demonstrating a willingness to engage with interested parties. @smcady comments on the sentimental aspect of selling an inherited vehicle, showing a different perspective on the situation without being overly critical or overly enthusiastic.
Negative: @smcady expresses confusion about selling an inherited vehicle, suggesting that it might be disrespectful to the memory of the loved one who owned it, implying that the seller is missing out on keeping a family heirloom. @obturate shares a conflicting experience, illustrating the emotional complexities associated with inherited vehicles and implying that selling might be a rational decision under certain circumstances, yet it still casts a shadow on the selling process. Overall, there is an underlying tension regarding the sale of such a personal asset.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the Alfa Romeo 4C Italia, with various commenters expressing their appreciation for its design, rarity, and stunning color. @Wolfenhaus referred to it as 'the prettiest wheels ever produced,' and @TheDVS1 exclaimed 'OMG, what a beauty! The blue is stunning.' An overall trend of excitement about its beauty and unique characteristics is prevalent, suggesting that many are hopeful about its valuation and future in the market. @mbrandonmotorcars highlighted it as a unique opportunity due to its delivery mileage and rare color, while @ajbigal remarked on the joy of owning a 4C, contributing to a positive sentiment about the car.
Neutral: There are also several neutral comments that provide context regarding the car's rarity and production specifics. @igorgo and @thall shared details about the production numbers and the differentiation between the Italia and Stradale models, pointing out that while the Italia is indeed rare, some believe the Stradale is viewed as more collectible. @Rodeo questioned the predictions of auction prices, representing a cautious stance and reminding others to rely on market data, illustrating a balance between enthusiasm for the car and an awareness of its place in the broader collectible car market.
Negative: Conversely, some comments express skepticism regarding the car's value versus its desirability. @John4C pointed out the absence of certain desirable features, implying that it might be less collectible than other variants. @Rodeo and @thall critiqued the price expectations and the potential inflating of its value by commentors with vested interests. Additionally, @Rodeo labeled another user's high price prediction as an unrealistic attempt to sway the market, emphasizing a divide among commentors regarding the true worth of this model in the current auction.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments highlight the overall great condition of the vehicle, with @Mercer71 confirming that the car has no issues and is being sold simply to reduce expenses. @FXRcR1 remarks on the vehicle's appeal, acknowledging it as an awesome truck that's hard to replace once owned. @Au_88 also supports this view, emphasizing the excellent reputation of Bear Valley, the Land Rover shop, suggesting that this truck represents a good deal for someone. @WAGONBOYTD mentions the mechanical soundness of the vehicle, implying a high level of care taken in its maintenance, which adds to its desirability.
Neutral: @Mercer71 provides additional information regarding the sale process, including the extras that come with the car like two keys. The seller also responds to questions from potential buyers, confirming that the previous black rubber floor mats were replaced with new carpet ones and that the rear wiper is in good working condition. @Craigfalls inquires about the included accessories and the functionality of certain features, reflecting a common concern among potential buyers about the completeness of the purchase.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns over the car's cleanliness, with @AAvey pointing out visible stains on the armrest and passenger seat and inquiring if the seller has made any cleaning efforts. @clark1012 echoes this sentiment, suggesting that the seller should consider detailing the car before listing it to potentially increase its final sale value. Such observations indicate that there are visible imperfections that could deter buyers, as the stains diminish overall appeal.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The 2015 Porsche Panamera Turbo S has garnered much praise from users for its performance and overall value. Commentors like @Daimlerjeep praised its daily drivability as a supercar, while @Porsche356Carrera enthusiastically described it as a 'beast' that is both dependable and powerful. @Homework highlighted the affordability of these models due to depreciation, suggesting that buyers are getting a significant amount of car for their money, which resonates positively with potential buyers.
Neutral: The discussion also included some neutral inquiries and clarifications regarding the vehicle's features and location. @Archie0731 and @LeeE39er asked various questions about the steering wheel options and the location of the 2FAM facility, indicating general interest without any judgment. @Rolo222 raised a technical point about the screen's blinking issue during navigation, which was addressed succinctly by @2FAM (The Seller) who clarified that it was due to the camera and screen refresh rate misalignment, showing a willingness to engage with concerns.
Negative: Some users raised concerns that could be potentially off-putting for buyers. @bmwspyder questioned the longevity and high cost of brake replacements, implying that maintenance may be expensive. @Rolo222 further inquired about the screen issue and questioned why it had not been fixed. These negative perceptions touch on the potential costs and reliability issues associated with owning such a high-end vehicle, which could lead some prospective buyers to hesitate.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect enthusiasm towards the vehicle presented by @vfnrcc, demonstrating confidence in its condition and appeal. @Jimbo2300S praised the appearance of the Volvo, affirming that it is a nice looking car, while @LuigiF highlighted the meticulous maintenance, indicating it is ready for reliable use. @vfnrcc expressed a strong commitment to transparency, indicating that each vehicle is rigorously inspected and details disclosed upfront, which fosters trust among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on specific features and history, such as inquiries about the damage report from @thonxay and previous repairs from @LuigiF. @Jeffreyak603 wanted to know about the availability of a backup camera, to which @vfnrcc provided straightforward answers. General inquiries also centered around the title condition and details about any maintenance measures taken, showcasing the buyers’ interest in ensuring they are informed before making a purchase decision.
Negative: On the downside, concerns were raised about specific aspects of the vehicle, particularly the need for clarification on repairs. @LuigiF questioned the reasoning behind piston replacements and requested documentation, indicating some apprehension regarding the vehicle's history. This suggests that the potential buyers are cautious and keen on verifying all details before proceeding, which may reflect some lingering doubts about the vehicle's background despite the seller's assurances.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg describes the vehicle as a 'subtle beast' and expresses regret about not waiting for the RS5 Cabriolet, highlighting the S5's performance, grip, and balance. @rgknowscars praises the car's paint color, calling it one of the greatest factory paint colors in history for its ability to change hues in different light. @Bloom135 finds the RS5 beautiful and believes that clean examples like this one will trend back up in value soon.
Neutral: @Sethpie1, the seller, shares details about the vehicle's history, noting it is technically a two-owner car with careful maintenance and service records available up to 95k miles. He also addresses queries about the vehicle's specifications, including the differences between the European and US taillights and the performance impact of the Eventuri intake. @ctdriver and @awswerks engage in technical discussions, clarifying exhaust components and the nature of the vehicle's suspension and drive options.
Negative: @TexasBear raises concerns regarding frequent shop visits as indicated in the Carfax, asking if there were any underlying issues. @G2Z requests a driving video to hear how it sounds, while @PitchS4 questions what parts are actually included in the sale, indicating a lack of clarity. There are various inquiries regarding maintenance, such as potential carbon buildup and the service history, prompting discussions about the seller's maintenance claims.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Eclectic_Garage describes the bike as a "bada$ version of a bada$ machine" and emphasizes its toughness, likening it to the Samurai. @Meccanica also expresses admiration, referring to it as a "badass VMAX," indicating strong positive feelings about its performance. @Al_Loco shares that the bike is fun and fast, dismissing any notions that it is overrated, further contributing to the strong positive sentiments surrounding the vehicle.
Neutral: @mtr25 raises questions regarding the bike's issues and dependability, expressing curiosity about how the modifications affect its performance. @rvega (The Seller) responds to these inquiries, stating that the bike is fully serviced and mechanically sound, which may alleviate any concerns potential buyers might have about its condition. Furthermore, @mtr25 asks if the bike remains a good street cruiser with smooth performance compared to a stock VMAX, to which @rvega confirms that it does.
Negative: @Mr_White questions whether the bike can genuinely deliver 200hp, which implies some skepticism about its performance specifications. @jLookin seemingly has no interest in the bike's aesthetic appeal, indicating a lack of connection to the model beyond the technical performance discussions. Meanwhile, @mtr25's concerns about smoke emissions suggest a cautious approach to understanding the vehicle's reliability with all the performance modifications.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Jimmyblues1959 highlights the engineering brilliance of Colin Chapman, appreciating Westfield's homage to the Lotus 11, emphasizing how much fun these vehicles are. @PDXBryan reflects fondly on discovering Westfield Lotus 11 replicas in the mid-'80s, noting their fun appeal. @scotquin shares a firsthand experience, praising the driving experience and performance of the car, describing it as a "blast to drive" and affirming the owner's dedication to maintaining the vehicle in excellent condition. Others like @Tom_S. wish for the car to find a good home, adding to the overall excitement about the vehicle.
Neutral: Comments from the seller, @ronlotus, provide various details about the Lotus 11's specifications and history, including the modifications made, such as the upgraded Ford Cortina engine and improved suspension. He mentions that the speedometer and odometer are non-operational and discusses the car's registration status in California, reaffirming its street legality until December 2025. Several commenters ask clarifying questions about the car's features, such as its title status, rear brake setup, and passenger capacity to better understand the vehicle's functionality and current condition, indicating a general curiosity about the car's reliability.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the vehicle's components and history. @ron13 queries the operational status of the speedometer and the cause of an oil leak, highlighting potential maintenance issues. @uniquetoys expresses confusion about the failure of a previous sale, suggesting a communication breakdown occurred. Additionally, several users, including @rolexa, express skepticism about the e-brake setup, questioning how it was addressed given the rear disk brakes. While many comments recognize the car's fun factor, there are clear points of concern regarding its operational aspects and previous sale complications.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @enthusiastic_enthusiast (The Seller) expressed excitement about the vehicle, describing it as a "head turning 7-series" with a bright future. They emphasized their trustworthiness as a seller on BAT, having completed over 120 auctions, and welcomed inquiries and viewings. @LarryP described the car as beautiful and mentioned fond memories of high-speed cruising in a similar model, echoing a sentiment that the eventual buyer would be pleased. @David_P noted the impressive condition of the interior, while @cocoabone appreciated the overall aesthetics of the E23 model, indicating its desirability among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Comments indicated a mix of enthusiasm and practical concerns. @enthusiastic_enthusiast (The Seller) clarified some issues related to the Carfax report, explaining that reported accidents and mileage discrepancies had logical explanations. The HVAC system was tested and confirmed to be functioning well, addressing @cocoabone's earlier inquiry about its operation. Additionally, the seller informed participants about potential smog registration issues in California but reassured that any necessary modifications, such as re-installing a catalytic converter, would be handled at their expense before the sale.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle, particularly about the HVAC system, which @cocoabone noted as a common weakness in E23s, although the seller's reassurance about its current functionality alleviated some worry. @japashby raised questions about the onboard computer and service records, reflecting a level of scrutiny among potential buyers. @Jonfrancis echoed concerns about the difficulty of registering the vehicle in California, sharing personal experiences with similar models and highlighting potential challenges with emissions regulations.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the Humvee, with @rasman9 calling it "Sweeeet!!!" and @boaboyoz referring to it as a "tasty tan HMMWV" and a "cool build." @g1484 also showed interest by asking for a running/driving video, indicating enthusiasm about seeing the vehicle in action. There is a strong sense of appreciation among users for its condition and appearance, with @HAN2014 sharing a personal link to the military vehicle's history and expressing a desire to own a similar model.
Neutral: @dYr, the seller, provided informative responses to questions raised by commenters. They explained that the Humvee has been kept in a climate-controlled garage for four years and has features for full enclosure. They also confirmed the existence of a driving video, indicated the contents of a black plastic case under the hood, and clarified that both the exterior and interior have a LineX coating, which is textured. This informative interaction keeps the tone professional and focused on the vehicle's specifications.
Negative: There were no significant negative comments regarding the vehicle. @Waterdawg2004 inquired about any potential mechanical issues by asking about blow-by from the oil fill cap, but the seller assured that there were no problems, suggesting a generally favorable view of the vehicle's condition.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @nine17K expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, comparing it to a Fiat version of the iconic VW Thing. @Discobob finds the vehicle cool and wishes good luck to potential buyers. Additionally, @CraigInPA sees potential for the vehicle in a collection alongside similar unique vehicles, while @albatacos54 describes it affectionately as a cute tiny thing. @manpot, a former owner of similar models, is excited about the vehicle and the possibility of adding performance parts.
Neutral: @xdetoursx questions why the vehicle cannot be sold to a California buyer, citing exemptions for older vehicles, while @jpr engages with this concern, noting that the vehicle has a California title. @fxx.pilot provides details about the vehicle's VIN and registration, clarifying that it is actually a SEAT built in Spain, despite references to Fiat. @Vlombardi inquires about the availability of video footage of the vehicle running, while @Vimotors asks about the frame for the roof, to which the seller responds there is none.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the vehicle's saleability, particularly with @xdetoursx and @jpr debating the regulations surrounding selling to California buyers. @fxx.pilot expresses skepticism about the vehicle's identity, pointing out discrepancies in documentation that could affect its perceived value and authenticity. The seller, @Speedster777, acknowledges some necessary repairs, including the need for new tires, which could potentially deter some interested buyers.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters share excitement about the vehicle, highlighting its uniqueness and quirky characteristics. @kevinH notes that it stands out as a one-of-a-kind car perfect for events like 'Cars and Coffee.' @MakeItGoBrrrrrr also mentions that a person they know has one and describes it as a neat car that is rarely seen. @thomas50shades (The Seller) emphasizes that this car has consistently been the most unique at various events, reinforcing its unusual charm.
Neutral: There are comparisons made regarding who might appreciate this vehicle. @ndl83 humorously references what 'pimps in Japan drive,' while @SlowNRusty questions if it’s a Nissan S Chassis, hinting at its possible drifting capabilities. @craiginPA raises a point about how this vehicle may lead to extensive explanations about its background and features, suggesting a mix of intrigue and confusion from potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism or disdain for the aesthetics and appeal of the vehicle. @craigInPA aptly suspects that owning this car could involve a lot of questions about its design. @Carrera4.0 jokes that not even a character like Huggy Bear would be caught in this 'pimpmobile,' indicating a sense of ridicule. @BlitzLead's indecision between 'OMG!' and 'WTF!' captures a mix of shock and disbelief regarding the car's appearance.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentators generally express admiration for the vehicle. @Tom_S. describes it as 'nice,' while @GLWA,Fostekn calls it a 'beautiful truck' and appreciates the driving video shared. @Tesoro shares their personal experience of seeing the truck in person, noting that it is a 'Beautiful Truck' that can be driven daily if desired. @MakeItGoBrrrrrr also conveys sympathy and compliments the truck, indicating it looks 'beautiful,' 'classy,' and 'clean.'
Neutral: There are inquiries about specific operational features and history of the vehicle. @Tesoro asks about the functionality of the starter button, mentioning its low position, which @priscillabat (The Seller) confirms is typical for the 1950 GMC 100 and states that it is fully operational. @Patrohn queries how often the truck has been driven, to which @priscillabat (The Seller) responds that it hasn't been driven since late October 2024, except for brief periods related to recording videos for the sale. @AgentTJ asks about any restoration work done to seals or suspension, and @priscillabat (The Seller) assures that all work done is listed in the description.
Negative: There are some concerns expressed about the truck's usability due to its limited recent usage. @Patrohn's question about the frequency of driving suggests potential worries regarding reliability. Additionally, the mention of @priscillabat's (The Seller) personal loss and the truck's infrequent use since the passing of her husband in November 2024 implies a sentiment of sadness surrounding the vehicle's current state and its history.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Driftpinto shared a warm welcome to the auction, expressing readiness to answer questions about the car and provide additional photos or videos. @broodie noted that the vehicle looks nice, suggesting a generally positive impression of the car's appearance. @Kingkarmann appreciated the thoroughness of the interior nose shots provided by the seller, indicating that the body of the car seems solid.
Neutral: @Kingkarmann raised some technical observations, mentioning potential issues like a downshift grind that could hint at worn synchronizers, particularly in second gear. He also pointed out the speedometer not appearing to work and noted various missing seals on the vehicle. However, he did recognize that the car seems to run well overall, and a competent metalworker could address the concerns about the nose of the vehicle.
Negative: @broodie questioned whether the car had operated in the San Joaquin Valley without an air filter, hinting at a negative aspect of potential maintenance or care. @Kingkarmann's comments also leaned towards the negative by detailing the issues with the car's functionality, such as the grinding sound and the inoperative speedometer, which could indicate underlying problems that need addressing. This combination of technical assessments suggests that while the car has desirable qualities, it requires attention in several areas.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The 2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor, known as Daisy, garners a lot of positive attention for its performance capabilities and appealing aesthetics. @JFoglia highlights the vehicle's uniqueness during its initial release, noting its low mileage and well-maintained condition. Many commenters, including @ShelteredV and @BostonCarGuy, express admiration for the striking blue color and classic looks, indicating that the truck stands out and often attracts compliments. The features of the truck, such as its powerful 6.2 liter engine, are also praised by several enthusiasts, with @Ricoman noting the fun and enjoyment these Raptors provide, contributing to their popularity.
Neutral: Several users have sought clarification on specific maintenance and ownership history concerns, such as the number of previous owners and any upgrades performed on the truck. @Todd_Z mentions the need for a Fuse 27 relocation, while @mquijada requests additional pictures of the chassis. The seller, @AutoDreamRides, responds promptly to inquiries, ensuring transparency about the truck's history and current condition. The discussion about whether the vehicle has Bluetooth capability also underpins the neutral comments as buyers consider modern conveniences in a classic model. Overall, these conversations reflect a mix of curiosity about features and attention to detail.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming positive response, some negative comments raise concerns about the vehicle's maintenance and the number of past owners. @Fahrvergnugen7 questions why the truck has had five owners with low mileage, prompting discussions about potential red flags. @MikeR mentions a disconnection in the air intake system, urging immediate attention to avoid performance issues. These critiques suggest potential underlying issues that could deter some buyers, such as reliability concerns and the vehicle’s maintenance history, potentially impacting its marketability.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @jseifert75 (The Seller) has provided reassurance regarding the condition of the vehicle, stating that the tires are in excellent shape and there are no issues with long-distance travel. The oil and filter have been recently changed and all fluids are reported to be in good condition. Commenters have shown interest in the vehicle's performance and travel capabilities, with @Rangoon_Red expressing interest in driving the car over a significant distance and receiving confirmation that it is suitable for such a journey.
Neutral: The conversation included inquiries about the vehicle's service history and specifics about the tires. @MMike asked about the service declines and the tire manufacturing dates, showing a need for clarity on maintenance records. @TheNiceMarmot brought up whether the car had been fleet or privately owned prior to its current listing, indicating concern about the vehicle's background.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the "Service engine soon light" mentioned in the comments. @Rangoon_Red sought clarification on whether the light was operational or indicating a need for service. Furthermore, @MMike questioned the reasoning behind declined service recommendations at the last maintenance, suggesting potential oversight or neglect in servicing that may lead to buyer apprehension. Additionally, @jkws noted that there were unclear tire date codes from photos, causing uncertainty about their age and condition.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Montecarlobeach provided several updates and clarification regarding the condition of the vehicle, emphasizing that the headliner is nearly perfect and that he has taken new pictures to showcase it. The seller also confirmed that the clutch is currently at 50% life, which may be reassuring for potential buyers. Overall, the seller seems responsive to inquiries and willing to provide additional information to help prospective buyers make informed decisions.
Neutral: Some commenters, like @ahsmaroon and @Jaybird_57, requested additional pictures of specific vehicle areas, which indicates their interest in the details of the car. @safulop confidently notes that the transmission fluid pumps typically last about 75K miles, suggesting a positive outlook on the condition of the vehicle's components. However, there are concerns about the condition of the switchgear, with @Thedogged1 mentioning the sticky nature of some buttons as previously noted in past listings.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle are evident, especially regarding the condition of its switchgear. @Thedogged1 pointed out that many of the center console buttons are sticky, a fact confirmed by @Montecarlobeach, who expressed frustration with delays in getting necessary repairs done. Additionally, @jeralb sought clarification on the term "switchgear being sticky", indicating that potential buyers may find this issue irritating or concerning while driving, despite the seller's assurance that it is not a significant annoyance.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Stingray383 (The Seller) emphasizes the extensive effort he has invested in transforming the vehicle into an exciting driver’s car, describing it as an 8/10 project. The car is noted for its driver-quality paint, which looks great from a distance, and it attracts attention due to its high-performance chambered exhaust. The seller mentions that the car can be enjoyed as-is or can be further enhanced, making it a fun choice for both casual drives and car shows. @johnnyvett highlights the car's appeal as a good-looking C3 that offers an economical entry into the market while sporting a powerful engine, which adds to the vehicle's attractiveness.
Neutral: @Mr.CUCV asks practical questions regarding the vehicle's functionality, noting that the AC is inoperable and inquiring about the operation of the windows and various gauges. @Stingray383 (The Seller) responds with detailed information, confirming that the powered windows are functional, although a bit slower than modern standards, and that the majority of gauges worked previously but may have disconnected during some refurbishments. He reassures potential buyers about the state of the lights, confirming their operational status and mentioning that he replaced dead bulbs as needed.
Negative: Despite its strengths, the vehicle does have issues, as noted by @Mr.CUCV and elaborated on by @Stingray383 (The Seller). The AC is not working, and the seller suspects refrigerant loss without further investigation. He also acknowledges minor interior rattles and the potential for overheating during longer drives, a common issue for classic cars. The seller's description of some small paint bubbles and the need for finishing touches also indicates that while the car is enjoyable, it may require additional effort and investment to reach its full potential.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Rpharesjr expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting his fondness for the 6th generation dent sides of the Ford F-150. @ExclusiveMotorClub, the seller, greeted potential bidders warmly and highlighted the truck's strong performance, mentioning it runs and drives great after some updates to the motor. @dj_walls2424 reminisced about their experience selling the pickup, emphasizing its reliability and potential longevity when well cared for.
Neutral: @ExclusiveMotorClub stated that the auction is open and encouraged questions from bidders to ensure transparency. They mentioned that the truck has been consigned from a client who hadn't used it much, also informing prospective buyers that videos would be posted for further insights into the vehicle's condition. @Todd_Z inquired about a specific detail in the writeup concerning the lift gate, seeking clarification on whether it referred to the tailgate that doesn’t open.
Negative: @Todd_Z's inquiry about the malfunctioning lift gate indicated a concern among potential buyers regarding the truck's condition, as issues like a non-functioning tailgate could deter bids. Although @bringatrailer updated the description to clarify, the need for such updates might suggest a lack of thoroughness in the initial listing, which could negatively impact buyer confidence.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @radcrujones praised the vehicle as a 'sweet ride' and noted that much critical maintenance has been taken care of. @Gary_T1 commented on the affordability of the 1999 911 Coupes lately, expressing interest in the vehicle's maintenance history. @Speedmaster64 shared favorable comments based on their past experiences with 996.1 models, stating this particular car looks like a perfect example and suggesting it should sell at a great price due to its condition and cosmetic character.
Neutral: @jkporterfield remarked that despite the center console, the interior of the car is in phenomenal shape for a vehicle with over 100k miles. @Lesr3204 asked about the manufacturing date of the car, indicating a common inquiry among potential buyers. @Stephenh27 inquired about the frequency of the gear disengagement issue, showing a desire for clarification before making any decisions.
Negative: @Stephenh27 expressed concern about the popping out of second gear, asking for frequency details which the seller noted happens occasionally under specific cold start conditions. The seller also mentioned that the heating function is not as effective due to foam disintegration in the mixing doors, although the air conditioning performs well. Additionally, there were mentions of condensation leaking from the exhaust and pixelation in the dash gauge, which could deter some buyers.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments praising the vehicle highlight its unique modifications and well-maintained condition. @toy4runr85 notes that the cargo version with no rear seats is a rare option, and @sgntpepper78 appreciates the truck's excellent care over the years. @DeTomasofradiavolo finds it an honest example that could shine with some TLC. @whitefencefarmer encourages bidding based on a previous positive experience with the seller, indicating trust in the transaction process.
Neutral: A few comments express curiosity or request additional information about the vehicle's condition and history. @AGA1118 (The Seller) clarifies questions about the rear seat deletion and the vehicle's maintenance history, stating that it has been in the family for a long time. @Alex2526's inquiries about the dash condition and request for more photos show interest, while @Alpina82's questions about the title and mileage aim to gather necessary details for potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments express concerns regarding the vehicle's overall condition or functionality. @Mepaqehe asks about repairing the A/C, revealing potential issues with climate control. @wallytoo comments on the interior wear and suggests the cruise control may not work, indicating some elements may require attention. Juggling the condition of the vehicle versus its potential, @AGA1118 (The Seller) acknowledges the damage to the driver's seat and cracks in the dash but reassures that the vehicle still has its original mechanical integrity.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commentors praised the vehicle for its impressive modifications and overall aesthetic, indicating it as a standout choice for enthusiasts. @Evan_J highlighted the extensive effort that went into making the car look 'stock' while being comprehensively upgraded, leading to the conclusion that such a build will likely garner strong interest in the market. @Nuhdoi similarly acknowledged the careful selection of parts, while @bimmerpower (The Seller) emphasized that the owner had invested significant resources, estimating around $60k in upgrades. Commentors like @sidneyj expressed excitement over the car's meticulous care and maintenance, suggesting that the future owner will be exceedingly fortunate to acquire such a well-maintained vehicle.
Neutral: Several individuals inquired about specific details of the vehicle's performance and modifications. @luzarj and @tlon19 both asked about the horsepower, with @bimmerpower (The Seller) providing an estimate of approximately 410 hp based on the tuning specifications. @Phantoman raised a question regarding the car's exhaust system, prompting an explanation from the seller about modifications that had been made over the years. This ongoing dialogue about the car's features indicates a genuine curiosity and engagement from potential buyers, highlighting the community aspect of the vehicle's presentation.
Negative: Despite the many positives, some concerns about the vehicle were raised. @jbs37 questioned whether the modifications would affect the car's ability to pass emissions tests, to which @bimmerpower (The Seller) responded with uncertainty regarding current regulations but assured that it had previously passed emissions testing. Additionally, @dbgaul pointed out a potential typo in the advertisement that could mislead buyers regarding the vehicle's clutch system, while @bimmerpower (The Seller) acknowledged the error and clarified the correct terminology. The mention of minor physical flaws, such as small nicks in the paint protection film, also indicates areas that may need addressing before sale.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has been praised for its engine compatibility, particularly how smoothly a 350 Chevy fits into it, as noted by @heneryj. @Knuckles-R-Busted and @48DPW mentioned enjoying their similar setups, indicating that it can be a lot of fun for a fraction of the price of other more expensive models. @tvaldes04 (The Seller) plans to provide more videos to showcase the car, which can help communicate its value better to potential buyers, and overall the car seems to have a good appearance that just requires some tender loving care (TLC).
Neutral: Comments reflect curiosity about the condition of the vehicle, such as the mention of a slow oil leak and the removal of the AC compressor. @arcturus asked insightful questions about the leakage issues and the state of the AC system, while @tvaldes04 (The Seller) provided clarifications regarding previous problems, including a high idle and overheating fuel lines, which have been resolved. There are suggestions from @arcturus about enhancing the car's appeal by fixing minor issues and presenting aggressive driving videos that could attract bidders.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the condition of the vehicle, especially regarding the missing AC compressor and what some users referred to as 'UFO seats,' as indicated by @1of80. @bft25 questioned the frequent re-listing of the vehicle, which may imply underlying issues. Additionally, @MisterMitch commented on the car being in a region unsuitable for a non-functional AC system, further emphasizing its drawbacks and potential misrepresentations of its condition. @ScorchOK even mentioned doubts about the authenticity of the driving videos, suggesting they appeared overly processed or AI-generated.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has attracted positive attention for its overall appearance and potential as a collectible truck. @jimi_jone noted that the recent cleaning of the undercarriage improved its presentation significantly, commenting that it is now '100% more perfect than it first presented.' @Jzaveri7 (The Seller) has been proactive in addressing concerns, providing reassurances about the truck's history and condition, as well as promising to share more photos and videos post-cleaning. Furthermore, @Jzaveri7 emphasized that the truck has low mileage and presents a very good opportunity for buyers interested in a rare model.
Neutral: Several comments reflected on the truck's undercarriage, particularly referencing its previous conditions in Arizona and Michigan. @luigit expressed concerns about rust and suggested that the engine compartment should be rinsed, while @Citabria98 was surprised by the corrosion given the truck's location in a dry climate. In response, @Jzaveri7 clarified that much of the discoloration was just 'orange dust' and provided updates about the cleaning process, including power washing and applying a protective product to the undercarriage. @mystreetride inquired if a rust-preventative coating was applied, indicating a neutral stance that sought more information.
Negative: There were some criticisms regarding the initial state of the truck's undercarriage and its potential history of exposure to harsh conditions like saltwater. @luigit's comment about the rust leaving a 'bad taste underneath' and @Citabria98's skepticism about the truck's condition raised concerns about long-term durability. @jimi_jone also expressed disappointment, feeling that he was hoping to secure the truck at a lower price before the cleaning improved its appeal. Overall, while there were significant concerns about rust and the truck's history, @Jzaveri7 (The Seller) has actively engaged with these issues to restore buyer confidence.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its aesthetic appeal and reliability. @dwightj891 praised it as the best looking Z50 they have seen, suggesting a strong visual appreciation of the model. @Blizzard340 emphasized that the 80s and 90s era Z50s are great investments and described them as 'bulletproof' and 'well sorted,' indicating a consensus on their durability and quality design.
Neutral: There are inquiries and discussions regarding the specifics of the vehicle's performance and sourcing of parts. @DEO asked about the dyno numbers for the engine, indicating curiosity about the vehicle's performance metrics. Additionally, @DEO inquired about where to source small parts for a similar project, and @Brent804 (The Seller) responded with various sources for parts, demonstrating that there is a community around these vehicles that shares information and resources.
Negative: There are no explicitly negative comments about the vehicle in the discussion. However, @Brent804 (The Seller) mentioned the challenge of finding parts as they are getting harder to locate each year, which could imply a potential downside for enthusiasts looking to maintain or restore such vehicles.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @mike_rockwell finds the vehicle to be impressively unique, expressing love for its distinctiveness and good condition. He notes the potential for it to be an attention-grabbing 'looker' and appreciates that it is not a diesel engine, which he associates negatively. @Moonrunner1972 exhibits excitement with a simple yet impactful reaction of amazement. @Bradthese (The Seller) echoes these sentiments, sharing how endeared he is to the truck, affectionately named 'BULLY', and highlights the vehicle’s well-maintained floors and efficient doors. @boaboyoz agrees with the overarching consensus, calling the truck "cool AF" and indicating that it stands out remarkably in any crowd.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the practicality and functionality of the vehicle. @alrenwald inquires about the wiper motor and turn signals, which @Bradthese confirms are functioning well. The seller also elaborates on the vehicle's VIN tag and its accuracy for titling, prompting further inquiries from @Eradock about curb weight and tow rating, which @Bradthese addresses with insight into the vehicle's modification history. @Thirdcoast7691 asks about the option for in-person inspection, and @boaboyoz suggests consulting the seller for this arrangement. @gmc4500 raises a question about the truck's reliability for a long drive to California, to which @Bradthese asserts that he has driven it 250 miles without issues.
Negative: Despite mostly positive feedback, there are concerns and questions about some vehicle specifics. @alrenwald’s query about whether the wiper motor works raises a point of uncertainty about the truck's features. @Eradock's questions regarding the curb weight and towing capacity suggest ambiguity surrounding its operational limits, while @gmc4500’s worry about potential issues driving it to California echoes a cautious sentiment regarding its reliability for long distances. However, @Bradthese attempts to clarify these concerns, stating the vehicle has performed well over moderate distances.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and historical significance. @AbnMike called it 'absolutely gorgeous', while @bsracer noted its tribute nature to the motorcycle ridden by Jarno Saarinen, referencing impressive racing achievements from 1972. Such positive remarks underscore the aesthetic and nostalgic appeal of the vehicle, suggesting it resonates well with motorcycle enthusiasts.
Neutral: The seller, @PrivateCollectionMotors, actively engaged with inquirers, providing information about the motorcycle's history and addressing questions. They confirmed the motorcycle is a tribute to a famous racer and stated it has been on static display for some time. Overall, the responses reflect a collaborative effort to clarify details about the bike's specifications and past.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the motorcycle's condition, specifically about the fuel lines. @bbass pointed out that the right side tank fuel petcock was not connected and questioned whether the listing accurately describes the motorcycle as a race bike or a tribute build. Additionally, @D_Federico inquired about the possibility of hearing the motorcycle run, to which the seller admitted limited experience in starting it, indicating potential uncertainty about the motorcycle's functionality.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @oddimotive_cason appreciates the vehicle's similarities to a model owned by his wife and expresses optimism that an interior detail could significantly improve its cleanliness, indicating a strong belief in the effectiveness of such services. @jpeck2 finds the vehicle beautiful and is actively engaged in the purchasing process, showing a keen interest in any service records and the vehicle’s condition, which the seller (@MisterTea) responds to transparently, sharing efforts to resolve minor issues and detailing plans.
Neutral: Comments from @newcarpro provide detailed vehicle specifications, which might be useful for potential buyers looking for specific information about features and options. The interaction does not reveal strong opinions but contributes valuable factual details about the vehicle's specifications and warranty information. @michaelmm queries the differences in seat dimensions between the Navigator and Aviator, signifying interest in comfort and space.
Negative: @mistertea acknowledges some minor imperfections, particularly on the second-row driver side seat, hinting at potential concerns for buyers regarding the vehicle's wear and tear, especially with kids involved. @shahpour raises concerns about potential mechanical or electrical issues, showing apprehension about the vehicle's reliability and overall function, an important factor for any prospective buyer. Additionally, @jpeck2 mentions the need for transparency about any rust or hidden damages, reflecting a cautious approach to the purchase.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commentators expressed admiration for the vehicle, with @lincolnrob noting it as one of their favorite cars and complimenting the design. @lincolnsandcaddies appreciated how well the car has been maintained, wishing it could be theirs. @Shandul described it as a "piece of Art," indicating strong visual appeal, while @89lincolntc complimented the overall condition and even remarked on the stereo. Additionally, @Caddyman84, the seller, received compliments on the car's functionality, confirming that the windows and AC work properly, and he offered to provide driving videos for potential buyers.
Neutral: @Caddyman84 provided detailed responses to several inquiries about the vehicle's features and history. He clarified that he is not the original owner but received the car from his uncle, who completed most of the maintenance and repairs. The car had sustained damage in the rear after a car show but had no significant mechanical issues. He addressed @posetong's questions about potential leaks, stating that there were none and mentioned that he would check the cruise control functionality. He also indicated he would upload a video of the vehicle soon, demonstrating its working features.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's past, particularly regarding the damage indicated in the car fax report. @posetong specifically asked about the extent of damage to the left rear and potential leaks, indicating some hesitation to purchase without further details. This reflects a level of scrutiny from potential buyers who are keen to understand any hidden issues with the car. Overall, while the car has many supporters, there are notables seeking more information to ensure a satisfactory purchase.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @skonker described the vehicle as 'awesome' and a 'groovy machine,' indicating strong enthusiasm for its design. @Corveric expressed interest in how an eight-door version would complement his Rampside, showcasing positive feelings towards the model's uniqueness. @StrangeIron noted the vehicle's rarity and desirability within the Corvair community, emphasizing how much he appreciated the redesign of the fuel tank in 1964. @TessieB simply remarked 'Nice!', reflecting a positive impression, while @CFred highlighted the uniqueness of the vehicle, encouraging potential bidders by noting the sentimental value for previous owners, specifically referencing a personal connection to a Corvair he used to own.
Neutral: @PhilVair corrected @GRS1st about the absence of a rear transverse leaf spring in the 1964 Corvair Vans, providing factual information. @Stinger17 (The Seller) shared details about the vehicle's rarity, mentioning that only 15 are registered in the Corvair registry and his personal journey in acquiring it. The seller’s comments included auction details, such as the vehicle's sale price of $103,400 and the fact that it was previously displayed at the Automotive Hall of Fame, incorporating informative aspects without a strong emotional leaning either way. @CadillacBob1968 appreciated the usefulness of the extra cargo doors, framing them as a rare option, which adds a neutral perspective on the vehicle's features.
Negative: @GRS1st questioned a specific design element of the 1964 Corvair Vans, hinting at a potential oversight in the listing's representation. His comment suggests that there might be an expectation of more detailed, accurate historical context in the vehicle’s description. @Pedigo contrasted this unrestored Greenbrier with a more expensive, restored example, suggesting disappointment about the condition of the vehicle in discussion compared to what a fully restored model could offer. This highlights potential concerns about value and market expectations, indicating that while unique, the vehicle may not meet all collectors' standards.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's unique Sepia Brown color, highlighting it as beautiful and distinctive, with @denright stating, "What a color!" and @Redbird41 noting that Porsche has always excelled in producing lovely browns. @gdogg called it "sensational", while @LargeProfessor described it as a "beautiful color" despite some confusion about the color specification. Overall, the vehicle was generally seen as stunning, with several commenters expressing excitement over its originality and rarity on the market, including @Frida who remarked on the timeless silhouette combined with the rich color. The unique specifications drew positive remarks, as evident from comments mentioning the great build and how well the color is appreciated by various enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters brought up practical considerations regarding the auction and the vehicle's features. @notrucks inquired about the absence of a window sticker, while @MBolour and @Purosangue asked for a chance to see the original window sticker instead of the built sheet. Others, like @Mcfling, reflected on the purpose of owning such a car, pondering the practice of flipping vehicles shortly after purchasing. The auction process, including the need for inspections and bidding procedures, was also a topic of discussion, with @Wob (The Seller) providing detailed insights and encouragement for potential bidders to engage with the seller.
Negative: Some feedback leaned towards skepticism about the car's color and overall value. @ActIII criticized the color combo as dreadful, expressing surprise that Porsche allowed this specification. Comments from @djlk reflected ambivalence toward the unique color, suggesting it might not appeal to a broad audience. Additionally, @jaredq22 raised a question about the optional PCCBs, hinting at potential discrepancies in standard features. @Fairmont663336 and @Cornbread also expressed personal preferences for more conventional colors over Sepia Brown, pointing out that their tastes did not align with this choice. Overall, while the vehicle received a lot of admiration, there were reservations concerning its color and appeal among traditionalists.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle, especially from @2021Scout (The Seller), who emphasizes the truck's excellent condition and careful maintenance throughout its life in Southern California. Commenters like @BurnsGarage and @mlesko73 contribute to this positive sentiment by complimenting the truck's attractiveness and expressing confidence in its market value. Additionally, @Cruisermorgan praises the engine's power and the overall aesthetic features of the truck, suggesting a deep knowledge of its performance capabilities and inviting enthusiasm for the prospective new owner.
Neutral: Several comments provide informative insights about the truck's history and technical details. @Larryg119 inquires about the vehicle’s past usage for towing and @2021Scout (The Seller) responds with details, noting that the original owner utilized it for hauling and maintained it for many years. @GAK911 raises a question about the authenticity of the auction's media content, showing interest in ensuring that current information is presented, which @2021Scout addresses by clarifying that the truck has had minimal modifications since ownership but offers to provide additional media if necessary.
Negative: There are a few concerns raised by commenters, primarily focusing on the truck's specifications. For example, @DavisHord asks about any issues with the 4x4 system, only to find out from @2021Scout (The Seller) that the truck is actually RWD. Additionally, @JackSweny brings up potential concerns regarding the vehicle's performance with the RWD configuration, suggesting it may need wheel bars. Such inquiries hint at an underlying skepticism regarding the truck's capabilities, particularly concerning its handling and towing performance.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Rodeo_King commented positively on the appearance of the truck, highlighting that he didn't notice any modifications and found it nice looking. @Bill_GMC appreciated the truck's capabilities, noting it appears to have a significant amount of aftermarket parts and considered it a very capable off-road vehicle. @michaelm1nc also praised the truck, calling it great looking and expressed interest in knowing whether the original rear seats were included in the sale.
Neutral: @Sherwood010 asked several technical questions regarding the vehicle, such as the purpose of the auxiliary battery in the rear passenger space and the suspension travel measurements for both front and rear. @RADco (The Seller) provided detailed answers to these inquiries, explaining that the auxiliary battery is an Antigravity 100aH Lithium Deep Cell Battery and that the suspension is set for desert running with specific travel distances of 11 inches for the front and 12 inches for the rear. @jbar25 inquired about the duration of the 3M vinyl wrap on the truck, to which @RADco (The Seller) responded that it has been on for over three years.
Negative: @HeyNk criticized the truck's modifications, stating that calling it "modified" is an understatement, implying that the alterations might overshadow the vehicle's integrity. @Bill_GMC's comment about the dominance of aftermarket parts over original Chevrolet parts suggests potential concerns about the truck's original design and function. Additionally, @Sherwood010's inquiry about the suspension setup for desert running could imply doubts about the vehicle's appropriateness for varied terrains.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm about the vehicle, noting its appealing features and excellent condition. @whipcity76 describes the car as a 'cute and cuddly Pagoda' in a nice shade of red with a contrasting grey interior, appreciating the overall patina and restoration work done. @mikeor highlights it as a great opportunity to own a beautiful pagoda, while @LUC_DC remarks on the vehicle's impressive performance, mentioning how smoothly it accelerates and that it starts without issues. @starmotors confirms that all major components have been maintained, contributing to its excellent drivability and structural integrity, showcasing it as a high-quality driver car.
Neutral: @starmotors provides detailed information about the vehicle's restoration and maintenance. The comments mention that the car has undergone significant work in the last 500 miles, including major components like the fuel pump, hoses, and steering gear being addressed. Cosmetic aspects are also discussed, such as the repaint on a rust-free Texas unibody, the condition of the chrome, and the overall quality of the panels and interior. Although some commenters ask for more specifics about repairs, such as the front subframe and dash pad, the responses from @starmotors indicate that the vehicle is in solid condition with no structural issues.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, some concerns are raised regarding specific elements of the vehicle. @rmoudry queries about the condition of the dash pad, which indicates that there may be some cosmetic issues that have not been addressed. Additionally, @rjchinfamily inquires about potential rust in the body, which, although @starmotors reassures is not present, suggests that buyers are cautious and seeking clarity on the vehicle's condition. Overall, the minor concerns about cosmetic aspects show that while the vehicle is praised, there is an underlying wariness towards its maintenance history.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Adelheid (The Seller) expresses pride in how well she has cared for the vehicle, describing it as a 'beauty' that has never been abused and has always been garage kept. She assures potential buyers that the lucky winner of the auction will be extremely satisfied with their purchase. She emphasizes her dedication to maintaining the car, indicating that it has been treated with the utmost care throughout her ownership.
Neutral: There seems to be some confusion among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's ownership history, with @Idiot59 and @SameName noting that the Carfax report lists two owners despite @Adelheid (The Seller) stating she is the second owner who purchased it from a dealership with very few miles. @2Tall4Sum raises a question about whether there was a recall concerning the wire harness, suggesting it may relate to headlight issues.
Negative: Concerns persist about the vehicle's history with the wire harness replacement mention by @SameName. @2Tall4Sum questions if a recall was done, which adds to the uncertainty surrounding the vehicle's repairs. Additionally, @CaptJack22 is seeking clarification on the purchase date, indicating that potential buyers may be wary about the transparency of the vehicle's history.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Maximoo (The Seller) presents a highly regarded Astro van with low mileage that has garnered significant praise in the auction comments. @Dollycat3 calls it an "Exceptional Astro van", while @Babadawv expresses admiration for its condition and utility, highlighting that the listing provides thorough details and great photos. Additionally, @SWEQS compliments the seller's transparency and thorough preparation, emphasizing how such efforts contribute to buyer confidence in the vehicle. Overall, the Astro is viewed as an admirable vehicle that offers both practicality and charm.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @cheezez and @letthegypsyhaveit, seek clarifications about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding potential leaks and the clarity of underbody photos. @Maximoo (The Seller) addresses these inquiries directly by assuring the absence of leaks and explaining the undercarriage photo conditions. @REDL89 shares insights on undercarriage maintenance and previous experiences with similar vehicles, reflecting a practical understanding of the van's upkeep. These comments highlight a common interest in ensuring the vehicle's performance and reliability prior to purchasing.
Negative: While the overall sentiment is positive, there are some concerns raised by commenters. @desicar shares experiences with engine failures in a similar model, which may cause potential buyers to consider the long-term reliability of the vehicle. @letthegypsyhaveit requests better visuals to assess rust conditions, suggesting some apprehension regarding the undercarriage's state. Additionally, @SWEQS notes the challenges posed by overly critical comments about a well-used vehicle, indicating frustration with expectations versus reality for such an older model. Although these comments do not diminish overall enthusiasm, they reflect a cautious approach among potential buyers.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @RMS_Motors (The Seller) mentioned that the car is extremely well kept and clean, assuring potential bidders that it has no issues. This E30 received compliments from several users, including @Dandanbell58, who described it as a glorious example and noted that it would be a smart investment. Additionally, @fitswell expressed interest in the vehicle and commented on its great looks, indicating a strong appeal among the community.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle included inquiries regarding past auction events and concerns over the vehicle's condition, such as the illuminated warning lights observed by @JustAManWantingACar and @RJR. @MickeyThompson and @Johnytech also raised questions about the car's original bumpers and conversion, indicating that some buyers are interested in the car's history. Furthermore, @SouthNJ asked about financing options, which the seller confirmed are available.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the car's slight vibrations at higher speeds, a point brought up by @amgnut, while @RMS_Motors acknowledged that these vibrations are minimal. @Gheemer suggested that inquiries about the past auction mishap should be directed to the seller, indicating some frustration among the community regarding auction transparency. Additionally, @uscfighton noted the lack of clarity regarding the bidding situation, suggesting a need for better communication about auction issues.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed a lot of enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as a 'very cool hauler' and 'awesome.' @UncleFred1 mentioned that it is well set up for loading classic cars for trips and shows, indicating its utility. @Boatymcboatface appreciated its appearance and inquired about its hauling capacity. @VantageAuto shared his own positive experience, stating that he has moved heavy vehicles with ease using a similar model. Other commenters, as well as the seller, noted that it has been easy to drive even with a load, that the electric winch simplifies the loading process, and that the vehicle functions well overall with no mechanical issues.
Neutral: The comments contained a mix of requests for specifications and operational inquiries. @RJRambler and @Mullins01 both asked about engine hours and weight, highlighting an interest in understanding the vehicle's capabilities better. The seller, @Lanciafan, provided some clarity on these questions but admitted he did not know all specifications, which generated further follow-up comments about capacity and measurements. Commenters indicated varied degrees of familiarity with the vehicle's features, such as the weight capacity, angle of ramps, and suitability for heavier cars, leading to discussions about the operational aspects of the vehicle and the necessity for further clarifications and videos from the seller.
Negative: There were a few concerns noted by commenters during the discussion. @Bartlola raised a question about a potential emissions recall related to the vehicle, expressing caution regarding its compliance with current standards. @laffman also inquired about its registration and emissions testing status, suggesting some hesitance due to these factors. Additionally, a couple of commenters expressed skepticism surrounding the vehicle's towing capacity and the suitability for certain heavy models, particularly when linked to weight specifications and the potential for modifications needed to improve performance. There was an overall sense of uncertainty surrounding some aspects of the vehicle's functionality, particularly in relation to heavier loads.
|
1,800-Mile 2003 Chevrolet Corvette Coupe 50th Anniversary Edition
1G1YY22G135125090
Lot 196764
Private Party
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle's condition and aesthetics, noting its low mileage and well-maintained status. @CXT, the seller, emphasizes his dedicated care for the car, having kept it in a climate-controlled environment and driven only 1,765 miles since its purchase in 2003. Many appreciate its rarity, with comments like 'Nice example that will be worth something down the road' from @0311Jarhead highlighting the potential value of a vehicle that has been so lightly used.
Neutral: Several users provide factual inquiries or comments regarding the details of the vehicle, such as tire condition, changes made, and maintenance history. @CaptJack22 asks about specific parts and their condition, while @Rich7769 inquires about the use of the car on grass. @CXT responds to these inquiries by confirming the original state of various components and explaining his maintenance practices, including his unusual method of changing fuel every two months rather than driving the car regularly. This reflects a focus on preserving the vehicle rather than making it a daily driver.
Negative: Some users raise concerns about the lack of recent maintenance, specifically regarding the oil change history, with @jman5108 questioning how often the car is started or driven considering the last oil change was in 2014. @Slick1964's comment about the oil change lends itself to skepticism about the car's overall upkeep and whether it may need additional service before being driven regularly. Additionally, @idling wonders why @CXT has owned such a beautiful car without driving it more, suggesting a disconnect between the seller's appreciation for the Corvette's beauty and its practical use.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed strong appreciation for the vehicle, praising its combination of features like the manual transmission, aesthetics, and overall build quality. @thunderc highlighted the right wheels and paint as key selling points, while @RedPiano1 fondly recalled its robust nature akin to their experience with W123 Mercedes. The design was deemed iconic and timeless by @Sjalabais, and several users noted that the manual transmission enhances the driving experience, with @Caymanorcarrera specifically commenting on the rarity and desirability of a manual 240 in good condition. Overall, there is a consensus that the car is visually appealing and well-presented, with @MakersMark and @PDXBryan reflecting on its sentimental value and potential for a successful sale.
Neutral: Some comments neutrally addressed technical aspects and maintenance considerations. @YV1LW inquired about fuel requirements, and @Ratty asked about cruise control availability, which was explained by @JLAMA80s (The Seller) as not being present due to the base model trim. The topic of the timing belt also came up, with @chiplamb questioning past service records, and @masterqi noting the non-interference nature of the engine. @Ycbmsma shared their own experiences with timing belts, emphasizing that they often last longer than expected, leading to practical discussions about maintenance without leaning too heavily on the vehicle's limitations.
Negative: While the overall sentiment was positive, a few commenters raised potential concerns. @Ycbmsma mentioned that despite enjoying a manual transmission, the car's performance might not be described as "spirited" due to its lighter horsepower, which could be a drawback for buyers seeking speed. @Harrygriffon expressed worries regarding the A/C performance for warmer climates, while @addicted242boost sought detailed photos of the body weld seams, indicating a level of scrutiny that suggests hesitance. Additionally, there were observations about the timing belt service history that pointed toward the necessity of future maintenance, suggesting that potential buyers should consider these factors before making a decision.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @FTClassic mentions a nostalgic connection to the vehicle, noting its lovely characteristics and perfect size. They express a desire to learn more about the car's backstory, indicating a deep appreciation for its history. @Dollycat3 highlights the car's classic color combination and desirable features, praising the model as a wonderful example of the 280SE 4.5.
Neutral: @jeisert comments on the visual appeal of the vehicle, requesting cold start and driving videos, which suggests a general interest in its performance but lacks any strong opinions about the vehicle itself. This indicates curiosity among potential buyers regarding the car's functionality.
Negative:
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @sammyfrenchtoast describes the vehicle as "absolutely nasty in the best way possible," indicating a strong enthusiasm for its appearance or performance. @MexicoJoe highlights the enduring popularity of 80's Toyotas, expressing excitement about the vehicle's exceptional build. @Colmurphy praises the truck as an "awesome Land Cruiser" and assures potential buyers they will be getting a fantastic vehicle based on the servicing conducted by BTB Products. @Mr_treetop humorously notes that even his wife is impressed, which further emphasizes the truck's appeal. @beranearms simply states "NICE!" reflecting positive sentiment towards the truck.
Neutral: @Presidentho seeks clarification about the vehicle's paint, acknowledging that it is originally white but currently has a white wrap. @GreenvilleSteve inquires about the mileage of the vehicle’s 6.2-liter V8 engine. @Pistol_Pete_1 expresses an astonished reaction with a simple "Wow!" suggesting he is impressed but doesn't provide further details. Various commenters ask questions regarding the vehicle’s specifications and performance, showcasing curiosity about its features without providing a clear positive or negative viewpoint.
Negative: @babylonsisters_shakeit raises a concern about the difficulty of getting the vehicle to pass smog tests, indicating a possible issue some buyers may face. @FW_BRONC questions the durability of the H55F transfer case and rear end given the increased power from the engine, hinting at concerns regarding potential complications with the vehicle's drivetrain under added stress. @Taylorprince (The Seller) admits that while smog hasn't been an issue yet, there are some uncertainties related to the engine's compliance status, showing that there might be areas of concern surrounding emissions regulations.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the overall quality and history of the BMW 2002Tii. For instance, @halfthrottle highlighted its performance and reliability, calling it a "pure sports sedan". @bhoffma1 expressed admiration for similar cars, wishing good luck to the seller, while @1972BMW2002TII appreciated the car's aesthetics, emphasizing its beauty on sunny days. Additionally, @Ycbmsma commended the seller for being involved and providing detailed information about the vehicle, which fostered a sense of trust and transparency among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the car's modifications, repair history, and condition. @fredhamm333, the seller, provided a thorough background of the vehicle, including details about its engine rebuild, repainting history, and the various enhancements that have been made over the years. This information was valuable to those curious about the car's current state, including its imperfections and ongoing maintenance needs, as seen with mentions of minor rust and mechanical adjustments needed.
Negative: On the flip side, there were concerns raised about certain aspects of the vehicle. @dcitron questioned the paint quality and potential overspray issues, while @ghrays inquired about rust and roadworthiness for longer drives. @golfmanbob pointed out the removed air conditioning and inconsistencies in oil change frequency. @fredhamm333 addressed some of these queries, detailing past repairs and outlining areas for future work, which indicated the vehicle's somewhat mixed condition despite its charm.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CarCaveSRQ (The Seller) emphasizes how special the 2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG is, noting its rare specifications and stunning color combination. Commenters like @fotostars and @boaboyoz praise the car's design and condition, with @ashley21 calling it a superb example. Additionally, @ChicagoGas and @VRV000 express admiration for the car's production rarity and overall performance, underscoring the vehicle's exclusivity and desirability on the market. @JustBud shares a perspective from a Porsche enthusiast, acknowledging the SLS as a gorgeous automobile, while @HOP54 reflects on its history, noting similar cars sold previously.
Neutral: The conversation includes various observations about the vehicle's features and performance. @Amitd raises a question regarding the function of the passenger door struts, which @CarCaveSRQ confirms are operational. @kruseholdings mentions the transmission replacement history typical for these models, and commenters like @ChicagoGas inquire about specific production data. @Vorbex and @VRV000 engage in discussions about production specifics and their own SLS models, showcasing the community's interest in the car's history and technical aspects without definitive praise or criticism.
Negative: Some comments hint at potential concerns about the vehicle. @Amitd's query regarding the passenger door's alignment suggests a possibility of sagging, albeit it is attributed to photo angles rather than mechanical issues. Concerns about the history of transmission problems with the original units are noted by @kruseholdings, who highlights the potential high costs associated with replacements. Additionally, the nature of the auction and bidding brings minor frustrations, as indicated by @EAGBMW1, who feels they were unable to engage adequately during the bidding process, stating a general sentiment shared by many participants.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the 1968 Fulvia Berlina GT, praising its originality and character. @Danielito described it as 'cool,' while @Andrew_Leeson referred to it as 'Bella Berlina,' showcasing the affection many have for this classic Lancia model. @Watry highlighted the car's enjoyable driving experience and exceptional build quality, noting that it remains fun despite being a vintage model. Furthermore, @mbaum found its originality irresistible and inquired about the factory paint, demonstrating interest from potential buyers.
Neutral: The seller, @BBirdy, has provided detailed insights into the car's history, previous maintenance, and personal experiences, enhancing the narrative of this Fulvia. Supportive comments from individuals like @Adan_Figueroa and @bmarler indicate a shared appreciation among enthusiasts for the car's specifications and style. However, @William_S raised concerns about potential rust issues and necessary repairs, urging a closer inspection before proceeding.
Negative: Despite the excitement, some comments raised important concerns about the vehicle's condition. @William_S pointed out visible rust in the photos and speculated about hidden issues beneath the original undercoating, which could complicate future maintenance. The condition of the original upholstery was also criticized, as it appeared tired and may require restoration, indicating that while the car has charm, it may need significant work to bring it back to its prime. Additionally, comments like @Carawagon's expressed regret not being able to purchase the car, further suggesting that while appealing, the vehicle may not meet everyone's expectations regarding condition and pricing.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a lot of interest due to its unique design and character. @CoolCarHunter highlighted that driving it around town is a fun experience, with many people stopping to admire and ask questions. It’s noted to draw more attention than classic muscle cars at car shows, bringing smiles to onlookers and making it a special vehicle in the area. Many commenters, including @Rovintherange and @claysclassiccars, suggest it has potential for creative uses, such as rental for Hollywood productions or even Uber services due to its distinct appearance.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around technical inquiries about the vehicle. @Delazuche, @Dr110yd, and @JRMedved raised questions regarding dimensions, the functioning of AC and heating systems, and part sourcing for repairs. @CoolCarHunter, the seller, provided detailed responses about the vehicle's conditions, such as the current operational status of the heat and AC, available parts sourcing despite some challenges, and the specifics of recent maintenance work done on the car. The seller appeared open and accommodating, confirming that shipping arrangements could accommodate buyers from afar.
Negative: A few concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition, especially regarding rust and mechanical issues. @Jagshop questioned the odometer discrepancy, which @CoolCarHunter explained as a possible result of a title change, while also addressing rust spots found on the exterior. Additionally, @Dr110yd and @JRMedved expressed apprehensions about the availability of parts and the overall state of the vehicle, indicating some skepticism about the feasibility of restoring or maintaining it in the long run. These concerns highlight the potential challenges for prospective buyers.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Wob (The Seller) expressed a strong affection for the Ferrari 400i, emphasizing its comfort, reliability, and suitability for long journeys. Several comments praised the car’s beauty, with @CKKurtz and @Steve_Mc marveling at its impeccable maintenance and aesthetics, particularly the black paint job. @Acacg called it the best-looking 400i they've seen, while @DarthAlex highlighted its excellent appearance and @Luz_do_sol applauded the meticulous presentation of the vehicle and the extensive restoration work done on it. Commenters like @IppoJ reminisced about the V12 engine's history, adding charm to the vehicle's profile.
Neutral: Comments also contained practical inquiries about the car's history and specifications. @danilo asked about the original color, while @michaelchoi inquired if the car is registered in California and if it would pass emissions tests. @Fleche_dOr highlighted the complexities of understanding market value, providing data on auctions and sales. @TRibute shared their experiences on bidding and how auction estimates may not always reflect final sale prices, offering a perspective on the changing value of the Ferrari models in question. There was a rich exchange of knowledge about the car's features and specifications, reflecting the community's enthusiasm.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about specific details, like @Mdhportor questioning the integrity of aftermarket wiring and potential challenges with the self-leveling rear system. @Wob (The Seller) responded to @michaelchoi regarding the car's registration, explaining further details about its maintenance and smog readiness. Additionally, @BR_549 requested more information on invoices and maintenance records, indicating a desire for transparency that some might find lacking. Overall, while there were many praises for the vehicle’s presentation and history, concerns about individual components and pricing dynamics highlighted a cautious approach among some bidders.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed positive sentiments about the GMC Sonoma, highlighting its clean appearance and recent maintenance. @BostonKevinO mentioned that it looks like a nice truck, while @66caddy824 noted that it seems well-maintained, supported by receipts. @oshkosh99 too mentioned their similar vehicle and expressed admiration for the Sonoma's utility during their house build, indicating satisfaction with the model's overall functionality. The seller @70Chevy_1 further reinforced the truck's quality by promoting the numerous new parts and upgrades, painting a picture of a well-cared-for vehicle.
Neutral: There were some neutral inquiries regarding the truck, with @BostonKevinO questioning the purpose of the rectangular tabs on the bed cap and @justincabrera930 asking about burn marks on the driver seat, suggesting a past of smoking in the vehicle. Seller @70Chevy_1 responded to these questions by providing clarifications regarding the truck cap, the origin of the burns, and the fact that the seats have been cleaned and the carpet replaced, indicating an effort for transparency in the auction.
Negative: Conversely, a few negative aspects were brought up, mainly focusing on minor cosmetic issues. For example, @TPH56 pointed out what appeared to be screw holes in the dashboard, hinting at potential repairs or modifications that were not disclosed. Additionally, @justincabrera930 requested better images of a suspected crack on the dashboard, showing concern regarding unseen damages. Overall, while there are some small negatives, the truck's condition and meticulous upgrades seem to overshadow these concerns.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments express enthusiasm about the truck's condition and features. @breezybrae shares their excitement, stating they also have an orange crush, describing the truck as "very nice." @ccantwell (The Seller) responds to @breezybrae with appreciation for the compliment, highlighting that the vehicle has undergone significant maintenance, giving it a gorgeous appearance. @ccantwell (The Seller) also reassures @beans_bacon that there are no major concerns with the truck, emphasizing it has been well cared for with extensive work done on the motor and front-end drive components.
Neutral: @jda3 inquires about the history of the truck's replacement motor, indicating a desire for more background information which @ccantwell (The Seller) provides by detailing the recent refurbishments, including a new 4 bolt 350 motor and various replaced components. @barry1080 points out that while all lights, gauges, and wipers are functional, the A/C is not currently operational, although the heater works. This situates the vehicle's functionality in a neutral light, emphasizing it needs some minor repairs.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about the truck's condition, particularly regarding the A/C system. @beans_bacon questions whether anything should be concerning about the vehicle, to which @ccantwell (The Seller) acknowledges that while it requires an A/C condenser, it may be uncomfortable for long drives in warmer weather. Additionally, @JakeTheSnake115 suggests the vehicle needs some TLC beyond transportation capability, reinforcing that there are aspects of the truck that could use improvement, specifically regarding its appearance.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters are enamored with the vehicle, describing it as a rare find and a true survivor. @acett notes the durability of the slant 6 engine, emphasizing its reliability. @mike_rockwell appreciates the unique styling of the truck and suggests it has potential for customization. @Gmmuscleusa highlights the nostalgic 50s design of the truck, which he believes sets it apart from others of its era. @foleymoto, the seller, emphasizes the truck's originality, stating it has been well cared for and is in excellent condition. @Retro1 calls it a 'unicorn,' illustrating the desirability of vehicles of this particular class and condition.
Neutral: Many comments discuss the potential for modifications while also respecting the vehicle's originality. @CRUSH mentions the versatility of the truck for personal projects, and @BadAzp shares his contemplation of swapping wheels while acknowledging the documentation that supports its historical integrity. @sgntpepper78 articulates a hope that the next owner will maintain the truck's legacy of care and preservation. @pausum56 and @foleymoto share technical details about the vehicle's specifications, including the wheelbase, which @freedom2 inquires about, maintaining interest in the truck's practical aspects. Overall, the vehicle stirs curiosity and dialogue about its features and history.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming positive feedback, there are concerns regarding some aspects of the truck's condition. @Chris200260 questions the installation of a steering stabilizer, noticing issues with steering play during test drives, an observation echoed by other commenters. Additionally, there are comments about the windows not sliding open properly, and inquiries regarding any leaks from the engine or transmission raise caution. @heneryj brings up potential shipping costs and challenges while also reflecting on the vehicle's ride quality compared to modern expectations, suggesting that despite its classic appeal, it may not provide the driving experience of a new vehicle.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments express a positive view of the vehicle's overall appearance and features. @TJGardenGrove praises the color, stating it is their favorite, while @Pleasehelpme predicts it will sell for $30k with ease. @BenjoRobinson appreciates the distinct paint scheme, with confidence in how fantastic it looks in person. @MrClamdip and @CRUSH both compliment the wheels, noting that they look good and are an upgrade from what many people might choose. The seller, @Runnersandcruisers, reinforces these sentiments by stating that they believe the wheels suit the vehicle and that swapping them out is simple if desired.
Neutral: Some comments raise logistical queries and seek clarification on the vehicle's mechanical details, without expressing a strong opinion either way. @GreenvilleSteve asks about the undercarriage's condition, reflecting a neutral curiosity among commenters about mechanical performance. @Landyland and @fjfhh4k34f request detailed information on parts such as the timing chain and upholstery, which indicates an interest in the vehicle's upkeep but does not lean toward a positive or negative sentiment. @Runnersandcruisers, the seller, responds to all inquiries with detailed information, providing reassurance as well as evidence through photos and willingness to share videos.
Negative: On the negative side, some commenters express dissatisfaction with the vehicle's wheels. @Wineguy65 describes them as unattractive, using the term 'bugly' to highlight their distaste. @Helmet993 is surprised that a listing on BaT did not include undercarriage pictures, indicating a level of frustration regarding transparency. @fjfhh4k34f raises multiple concerns, questioning the vehicle's suspension and mechanical specifics, which suggests a wary stance about its condition. The seller @Runnersandcruisers attempts to address these negatives by clarifying the vehicle's features and maintenance, but some skepticism remains among commenters.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's quality and features. @bhhumphrey noted that the car looks solid and original, highlighting the priceless split rear bumper that is rare in MG circles. @Tlyke praised the MGB/C GT as the best looking and handling sports car of the era, stating that it is a beautiful car someone will be lucky to own. Additionally, @Dollycat3 expressed love for the manual fabric sunroof, further illustrating the appeal of this classic MG model.
Neutral: Commenters also discussed more neutral observations regarding the vehicle's history and details. @Grannyfannytanny pointed out features such as the period AMCO chrome headlight trim and speculated about the rear bumper's bike rack design. There were mentions of the original ownership and the significance of export delivery cars, suggesting that these aspects add to the vehicle's charm. The seller, @REMill0094, shared some trivia regarding the car's first owner and details about planned restorations and ongoing projects, keeping the conversation informative without strong opinions.
Negative: There were minimal negative comments, but some potential concerns were raised. @Grannyfannytanny noted that the interior roof liner appeared to have been dyed black at some point, suggesting a modification from its original state. @Grannyfannytanny also commented on the radio being only AM, contrary to what was implied in earlier correspondence. The seller acknowledged some of these points, indicating areas where the car might not be completely original, which could be concerns for purists.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Mouse51 appreciates the stock muffler, indicating the bike looks nicer than previous models with aftermarket parts. @nonuniform recalls the model's initial lack of popularity yet recognizes its collectible nature, describing it as a great little bike. @SomeDay shares a positive riding experience, emphasizing that it's a fun bike, while @Hosscienda reflects fondly on the bike he previously owned, noting its reliability and enjoyable ride. @Gio1966 assures potential buyers of the bike's perfect condition, affirming his commitment to selling an entire collection of well-maintained motorcycles.
Neutral: @Dynamic1 expresses interest in seeing various video content related to the bike, such as a cold start or a ride video. @ukguy acknowledges the bike's clean condition while noting a common concern about a weak area in the rear seat cowl, mentioning a previous auction that highlighted its unique California gas tank features. @KentuckyEd asks for clarification about the shipping process, and @911r provides additional details about shipping options while also sharing links to videos showcasing the bike's features.
Negative: @JuanPablo raises a concern about a potential scratch on the gas tank, indicating possible aesthetic issues. @Rbikefan1 inquires about the cause of the rear seat cowl crack, showing concern about the bike's condition. @Gio1966, while defending the bike's condition, acknowledges the existence of an existing minor crack when he purchased it from @Hosscienda, hinting at possible transparency issues in the bike's past.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight a generally enthusiastic atmosphere surrounding the sale of the vehicle. @derekabram (The Seller) welcomes everyone to the auction with a lighthearted tone, encouraging potential bidders to engage. @Jamunn expresses strong affection for their half cab, noting that it garners many compliments, while @fastj22 reminisces fondly about a past vehicle experience, indicating strong emotional ties to the model. @derekabram also emphasizes the vehicle's impressive condition both mechanically and aesthetically, suggesting that the future owner will be satisfied with their purchase.
Neutral: Commenters have raised specific questions about the vehicle's features and condition, with @KTDreemz asking about the potential for a full hard top and the vehicle's height, while @Jrm7 inquires about the rust spots on the lower passenger door and their potential extent. @GoodForTheSport also points out a detail regarding a bubble under the windshield. Overall, the dialogue is informative, focusing on the vehicle's specifications and current state, which indicates an active interest in understanding the product before bidding.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly the presence of rust spots mentioned by @Jamunn and @Jrm7. @derekabram acknowledges these issues, clarifying that while there are rust spots on the exterior, he has not detected significant issues within the door structure. @Jrm7 remains skeptical, pressing for additional information about the extent of the rust, indicating that potential buyers may have reservations about the vehicle's condition despite its overall appeal.
|
74k-Kilometer Japanese-Market 2006 Bentley Continental Flying Spur
SCBBE53W36C038212
Lot 196684
Dealer
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TopGun1957 described the car as beautiful, highlighting its visual appeal. @Tnbusiness71 (The Seller) emphasized the luxury and performance of this 2006 Bentley Continental Flying Spur, noting its stunning Glacier White finish and Hotspur red leather interior, coupled with advanced technology features and a strong emphasis on comfort. The vehicle is praised for delivering refinement, making it a perfect option for both daily driving and special occasions, showcasing craftsmanship and a unique presence in the luxury sedan market.
Neutral: @dlbangs found the car interesting, mentioning the expectation of a Japanese market Bentley being a right-hand drive vehicle, while @huseinrokadia inquired about shipping requirements to the US and received detailed responses from @Tnbusiness71 (The Seller) regarding the federalization process and the car's import restrictions. @Tatraman raised questions about the logistics of driving the vehicle from British Columbia to Ontario and received satisfactory answers about temporary permits and the process of ensuring compliance with provincial regulations, demonstrating that the seller provides comprehensive support to potential buyers.
Negative: @Harsdorf pointed out what seemed to be damage on the driver's seat, although @Tnbusiness71 (The Seller) assured that the wear was minor and expected with normal use. This highlights potential concerns buyers might have regarding the vehicle's condition. Additionally, there was mention of the complexities involved in the federalization process for U.S. buyers, which could deter interested parties due to the additional steps and costs required to legally import the car into the U.S.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @D90LE_001of300 appreciates the classic look of the vehicle, particularly the exposed galvanized seams that are gaining popularity. @Marianc (The Seller) mentions that the restoration aimed to restore the vehicle to its original look, which has become a signature aspect of the car he now loves. The positive feedback is evident from @mikefemiano, who expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance, while @Marianc (The Seller) reassured that the car is in showroom condition and has undergone significant maintenance, replacing various hoses and ensuring the engine and axles are in top shape.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about the vehicle's features. @Bobdillion questioned the presence of two blinking idiot lights in the driving video, to which @Marianc (The Seller) clarified that they indicated fuel level and blinker status. @Ritter7 asked if the car has air conditioning; @Marianc (The Seller) replied that it does not but mentioned the front vents work adequately while driving. @Aesthete inquired about the cabin heater, and @Marianc (The Seller) confirmed its functionality, noting that it works excellently.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the vehicle's features. @Ritter7's query about the absence of air conditioning could be seen as a downside for potential buyers seeking comfort. Additionally, @Bobdillion's observation of the blinking idiot lights might raise questions about the overall condition of the dashboard indicators, which could detract from the vehicle's perceived reliability. While @Marianc (The Seller) provided explanations, the lack of AC and the potential confusion about warning lights could negatively impact the interest of some buyers.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @mike0609 expressed their admiration for this vehicle generation, emphasizing its peak comfort, aesthetics, and reliability. Additionally, @dgnm82 praised the beautiful build quality, which suggests a strong appreciation for its design and overall construction. @Nlu (The Seller) mentioned the vehicle's history, including significant enhancements like the Dobinson shocks and springs, providing better body control while maintaining comfort. The seller also boasted about the consistent maintenance they've performed, reflecting their care and attention to the vehicle's upkeep.
Neutral: Several inquiries were posed by potential buyers, such as @skiitifyoucan who asked about mileage on the Dobinson shocks and other specifics concerning repairs and spare tire capacity. @dgnm82 wanted confirmation on whether all recommended services have been completed since 2018, indicating some level of trust in the seller's maintenance history. Questions regarding the vehicle's off-road capabilities were raised by @corboto, along with clarifications on the infotainment system's functionality from @calamai.
Negative: However, some concerns were raised as well. @corboto questioned the absence of a third row, suggesting a possible limitation for potential buyers needing more passenger space. @eddtur expressed disappointment regarding the lack of original parts being sold with the vehicle, which may deter collectors or those seeking complete authenticity. Lastly, potential issues were hinted at with the TPMS system, as @calamai pointed out a possible concern with sensor batteries, highlighting minor maintenance needed moving forward.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @maxs1 stated that the vehicle is a really nice car and expressed confidence in its potential sale price, estimating that it would not sell for less than $25k. The overall presentation from @Collectibleclassics painted a picture of a well-maintained luxury vehicle, emphasizing the uniqueness and desirability of the 2005 Mercedes-Benz S600, which has only 27k miles. Furthermore, the seller's dedication to transparency is reflected in their impressive Google Reviews rating of 4.9 out of 5, showcasing numerous satisfied customers who appreciate the high-quality inventory provided.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics provided detailed information about the buying and selling process, indicating that they work exclusively with private sellers and offer various services such as nationwide shipping and inspections through local trusted shops. They also highlighted their commitment to smooth and transparent transactions, encouraging potential buyers to reach out for inspections or logistics assistance. With a focus on customer service, the seller aims to make the purchasing experience as seamless as possible for potential buyers.
Negative: There are no notable negative comments regarding the vehicle or the seller's practices; however, some commenters may express skepticism about the pricing or the vehicle's market value in other discussions not included in the current referenced comments. The seller did not address any specific critiques or negative feedback, which could indicate a lack of awareness or engagement with potential concerns from the community.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CarNutMiami expressed interest in the vehicle and requested a close-up of the center console, indicating an appreciation for its design. @SavingManuals showed enthusiasm regarding the car, indicating a sense of anticipation about its potential. @Tuneup (The Seller) detailed the unique aspects of the car, such as the custom paint job and the nostalgic features like the headphone wiring for a better driving experience with the top down, suggesting that the car has unique qualities that appeal to enthusiasts.
Neutral: @marekrich inquired about the estimated costs and steps required to get the car operational again, showing a realistic perspective on the investment necessary for restoration. @Lakeview sought clarification about the car's mileage, revealing an interest in the vehicle's history and condition. @Dlee6204 asked about the details of a previous rear-end collision and paint job, which touches on the car's past without passing a judgment, thereby maintaining a neutral tone.
Negative: @Tuneup (The Seller) acknowledged that the car had been involved in a rear-end collision under their ownership, which may raise concerns about its history and structural integrity. Additionally, the extensive details shared about prior repairs, such as brake caliper inspections and the need for carb rebuilds, underscore a sense of caution regarding the car's current condition and the potential costs that a buyer may incur for restoration.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments highlight the stunning appearance and unique color combination of the Lotus Evora GT, with many users expressing admiration for its aesthetic and performance. @PlanC described it as a "stunning Lotus" that offers an exhilarating driving experience, while @05FordGT praised the car's mix of exotic looks and Toyota reliability. @DasAuto (The Seller) emphasized the car's mechanical soundness and features that make it memorable on the road. Additionally, multiple users, including @FlashSparkMedia and @Big_greasy_taco, noted the car's rarity and desirability within its specifications, praising its value and appeal to enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters shared insights and information about the vehicle's features and past listings. @IslandGuy and @Raring recalled that a similar car was for sale in Sarasota previously. @DasAuto (The Seller) clarified that this specific vehicle has only been owned in Illinois and has no modifications outside of factory settings. There was also discussion on the protective film on the car, with @tobiasz17azs asking about its presence and @DasAuto confirming it was included. Other users highlighted the practicality of certain features and the community's enthusiasm for Lotus cars, indicating a shared appreciation among fans and potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the car, notably @Rmazzarino's comment about the rear glass slats and their effect on visibility. There was a discussion about whether these could be replaced with glass, indicating a desire for improved functionality. @letthegypsyhaveit also raised the question of whether the Evora is competitive compared to new models, while @Balefire inquired about potential electrical issues. Despite these concerns, many agree that the car stands out in its league, but some echoed that the visibility issues could impact the overall driving experience.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @agorka has shown enthusiasm about the vehicle, expressing enjoyment during his brief ownership. He noted that he has driven the Porsche often and appreciates its qualities. The seller also made an effort to provide thorough documentation through pictures and videos, indicating a level of transparency about the car's condition.
Neutral: Several commenters have engaged with the seller regarding the vehicle, asking questions related to delivery options and specific concerns about the car's condition. @Sl1dewayzzz inquired about potential damage to the vehicle’s paint, to which @agorka clarified it was normal paint chipping. The seller also committed to providing additional video content to showcase the vehicle.
Negative: @agorka mentioned potential concerns regarding the vehicle's title transfer and the IMS issue, stating he has no records nor evidence suggesting it needs attention, but understands the peace of mind it could provide if addressed. This lack of clarity around some details may raise concerns for prospective buyers.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @RedPiano1 describes the vehicle as gorgeous, noting that despite its vintage, it has "typical BMW leather" that is still quite nice. @wh400 admires the car, referring to it as a pretty car, while @toughtraveler agrees that it is awesome to have a manual with low mileage. @piezopaul labels it as the perfect wagon, indicating that it is the last year of the naturally aspirated n52 engine, which adds to its appeal. Overall, many commenters appreciate the car for its features, performance, and aesthetic appeal, contributing to a positive impression of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters raise inquiries and comments that show a neutral stance. @ekimp requests more information regarding the absence of a six-speed manual in the title, suggesting a need for clarity among potential buyers. @thegrinchboy asks about the condition of the passenger seat, pointing out a possible stain in photo 39 and @xmusher raises questions about the dealer's details regarding engine torque and other mechanical concerns. This illustrates a group that is interested but seeking more information, indicating the vehicle is under scrutiny regarding details and specifications.
Negative: A few users expressed concerns about the car. @mzajda points out that the vehicle appears to have the wrong wheels, which were originally from a different model, and @ctkyle309 (The Seller) responds by explaining that the original wheels were curb scuffed and replaced with the current ones that are suited to the car's Euro wagon style. @GTEASER questions whether the necessary recalls for the PCV and driver's airbag have been performed, emphasizing the importance of safety and maintenance records. These comments reflect some reservations about the condition and modifications of the vehicle.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm for the Porsche 987.2 Cayman S, highlighting its performance, reliability, and overall driving experience. For instance, @hexagone notes that the model is becoming a 'discovered gem' and appreciates the enhancements over the previous generation, including improved power and reliability. @916Carl shares a similarly positive sentiment, celebrating the vehicle's aesthetics and capabilities, and emphasizing the limited production numbers that make it special. Additionally, @Unscented confirms that the car is accurately represented and praises the conscientious nature of the seller, further endorsing the vehicle's value in the current market.
Neutral: The comments also include inquiries about specific details regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @Kmfull69, the seller, clarifies that a crack in the windshield is present in the photos, ensuring transparency about the car's condition since it hasn't worsened during their ownership. Questions about service records and diagnostic reports are raised, to which the seller responds by sharing maintenance logs and details from a pre-inspection that suggests the car remains in good shape. @A2K asks about the car's history regarding winter use and corrosion, indicating interest in the car's longevity and integrity through different driving conditions.
Negative: On the downside, concerns are raised regarding certain aspects of the car's maintenance and performance. @NikonJim notices a missing page of the DME report, while @Lucky_Lefty reacts negatively to the windshield crack, predicting that it may lower the vehicle's auction value. @dburneikis and @TrailerInbound express worries about oil consumption, bore scoring, and specific engine hours, indicating a need for reassurance regarding the car's performance history. Other comments, like those from @spankengine, question the significance of fault codes appearing in diagnostics, which reflects hesitance among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's reliability.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting positive features such as the BBS Heritage Edition wheels which several believe are a great upgrade. @kevHy initiated strong interest with his comment, while @henryr confirmed the sale with a simple note of 'SOLD.' @babylonsisters_shakeit congratulated another user on purchasing a vehicle, emphasizing its value with the phrase 'one for the price of 4.' Additionally, @pwmac and @thpollock70 praised the overall appearance of the Land Cruiser and noted the allure of its heritage wheels, suggesting they are highly sought after in the community.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific details regarding the vehicle, indicating an interest in understanding its specifications and condition better. @Floridatiger1995, the seller, provided insights into tire sizes, stating that the vehicle comes with LT285/65 R18 tires which fit comfortably without rubbing issues. There were also discussions regarding the vehicle's history, including its time spent in Corpus Christi, Texas, as well as addressing concerns about surface rust, where the seller clarified that the frame remains structurally sound despite typical surface corrosion. Users like @marcus_clarkus requested additional photographs of parts of the vehicle such as the undercarriage and the cooling system to assure themselves of its condition.
Negative: A few concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly the corrosion on the chassis which @ThomasMore66 noted appeared aggressive. Commenters such as @Supraman noted past experiences with other Land Cruisers that showed more rust for far lower mileage, suggesting this vehicle might also have underlying issues. Additionally, @marcus_clarkus expressed some apprehension, asking if the coolant or radiator had ever been replaced, as well as inquiring about any potential engine issues that could arise with its mileage. Overall, while the reaction to the vehicle was largely positive, there were a small number of comments that highlighted potential red flags.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TomasCO expresses nostalgia about the bike's beauty and recalls fond memories of acquiring it when the Limited was released, praising it as an awesome scooter. @Cavers (The Seller) acknowledges @TomasCO's comment with gratitude. @H2R shares their personal connection to the model, reminiscing about their first street bike and extolling the motorcycle's handling abilities, adding good luck wishes for the sale.
Neutral: @Flyr1 raises a question regarding the completeness of the bike's original accessories, particularly the leather tool kit and owner’s manual, prompting @Brian50 to refer to provided images. @Cavers (The Seller) clarifies that the current tool kit is from a different model. @Fasted60 comments on the bike’s condition concerning imperfections and brings up the presence of a dent, to which @Cavers (The Seller) admits the dent and explains its origin.
Negative: @mototwin1 discusses the discrepancies between the current and expected specifications of the bike's kit, indicating that the setup might not be entirely true to its original condition. @karlcpo mentions rough starting issues and suggests maintenance needs, like a carb cleaning for optimal performance. @Cavers (The Seller) leaves conflicting information regarding the ownership history and maintenance of the bike, including the damaged manual and tools, adding to concerns about the motorcycle's overall integrity.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @septicore describes the vehicle as tremendous, while @Coldbru praises the cool 1986 date stamp on the brake caliper. @Caymanorcarrera highlights that the car looks like a clean, lower mile original with solid documentation, noting its well-preserved condition in Southern California. @Gmurrayl appreciates the 80's paint options and the interior design, reminiscing about its unique history. Overall, many comments express admiration for the vehicle’s condition, aesthetics, and specifications.
Neutral: @DKH8 requests paint meter readings for all panels, showcasing an interest in the vehicle's maintenance and condition. @mussberger inquires about the type of clutch used for replacement, preferring the rubber type for smoother engagement. @RTHJR (The Seller) acknowledges these inquiries and promises to provide the requested information, while also explaining aspects of the car’s paint thickness and repair history in a transparent manner. This neutrality indicates a level of engagement and commitment to clarity from both the seller and the commenters about the vehicle's status.
Negative: @RR2017 raises a concern about potential engine leaks, questioning if a rebuild will be necessary due to minor leakages noted by Porsche Classic Technicians. While @RTHJR (The Seller) responds that the leaks are minor and current assessments do not predict the need for immediate intervention, the mention of "sweating" could deter some potential buyers. Overall, the slight negativity revolves around apprehensions regarding engine maintenance and repair needs that may arise.
|
25-Years-Family-Owned 1990 Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo 5-Speed
JN1CZ24A3LX003748
Lot 196774
Private Party
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @mcbeck describes the 1990 Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo as a true survivor, highlighting its stock condition with minimal upgrades that enhance its appeal. The vehicle is characterized as incredibly well cared for and a great example of the Z32 platform, which is appreciated by potential buyers. @Scottwl38 expressed admiration for the car, providing a supportive thumbs up, which helps foster a positive community around the auction.
Neutral: Multiple commenters engaged in a discussion about the vehicle's warning lights, which may be a source of concern for potential buyers. @Jrsneed1 noted fears associated with illuminated seat belts, HICAS, and anti-lock brake system alerts, while @Chrystal reassured the community by sharing her own experiences with similar alerts in her 300ZX. @mcbeck acknowledged these concerns, providing transparent information about the vehicle's condition and ongoing efforts to address the warning lights, particularly relating them to low fluid levels rather than mechanical failure.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the illuminated warning lights, as @Jrsneed1 questioned if these issues were addressed before the sale, hinting at potential underlying problems. Additionally, @Willy431 suggested checking for leaks which could affect vehicle functionality and raise repair costs. Although @mcbeck reassured buyers by indicating that the important maintenance concerns had been recently handled, the ongoing issues with the warning lights could deter some potential buyers, creating hesitation around the purchase.
|
17k-Mile 2020 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 2500 4×4 RV Conversion by TOURIG
W1Z4EFVYXLP229888
Lot 196775
Dealer
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed appreciation for the vehicle features, particularly noting the presence of Apple CarPlay, which @WCD2020 (The Seller) confirmed after an initial oversight. Furthermore, @WCD2020 provided detailed information about the vehicle's height, clarifying that its height is approximately 9 feet 9 inches, which is important for potential buyers when considering garage clearance and overpasses. One user, @WaldoOC, highlighted the quality of the bike rack included with the vehicle, emphasizing its durability and the investment value of the components, indicating a good deal for prospective owners.
Neutral: Several inquiries aimed to clarify specifics about the vehicle's amenities, such as @Cresko's questions regarding the absence of the Dometic CF 55 fridge and the features of the roof-mounted air conditioner. @WCD2020's responses provided additional details on these topics, noting that the fridge was not included and that the air conditioning system would only operate with the engine running. @Erroracct asked about the usability of the bench seat while driving, to which @WCD2020 explained the configuration, suggesting that the design allows for comfortable usage of the seat without obstruction when arranged correctly.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's features, particularly regarding the cooling system and refrigerator. @Cresko pointed out uncertainty about the installation of the roof AC unit and whether it functions independently of the engine. @WCD2020's remarks about the aftermarket air conditioning units being underwhelming compared to the factory system did not help, as it implies potential limitations in cooling effectiveness. Moreover, the absence of the refrigerator as initially expected could diminish the vehicle's appeal for those interested in comprehensive travel amenities.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @bobrk thinks the vehicle is a great summer ride, while @mick59 praises the chrome bumpers, suggesting the factory missed out by not doing so themselves. @OldManVW finds the single cab attractive and appreciates the utilitarian nature of the bed liner, expressing that it will make someone happy.
Neutral: @acvroom appreciates the overall condition, noting the well-kept undercarriage and rockers, but raises a concern about the bedliner paint choice affecting future restoration value. @Chuck_Sneed inquires about the vehicle's color, and @JAL78 responds with its similarity to L87 Pearl White. @Jcmiller asks about potential alignment or steering issues, to which @JAL78 assures that the truck tracks straight with no excessive play.
Negative: @Sunroof expresses disapproval of the bed liner choice, indicating it could limit collector value. @acvroom agrees with the sentiment but suggests an alternative paint would have been cleaner. Additionally, @JAL78 responds to various questions regarding the mystery button on the dash, which remains an unknown, leaving some members curious about aspects of the vehicle.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @PackardGuy001 comments positively about the car, simply stating that it is a nice car. @GDogg expresses appreciation for the color, describing the Crystal Blue Firemist and white interior as "smokin hot" and wishing the seller best wishes. @jamessmithy also shares a positive sentiment about the appealing color, noting that most of these vehicles are usually red or white, implying that the unique color enhances its attractiveness.
Neutral: @johnpaulny (The Seller) provides responses to inquiries regarding the car's condition and its mileage, addressing concerns about the possibility of a rolled odometer. He emphasizes that there is no evidence of interior work done and assures that the condition is consistent with the mileage. He also shares background on the car, explaining that the 1976 Eldorado convertible was marketed as a collectible due to the federal rollover regulations of that time that did not materialize, which is why some owners kept mileage low. Furthermore, he mentions having no specific documentation for the mileage but encourages potential buyers to get the car inspected.
Negative: @carfan1978 raises concerns about the possibility of the odometer being rolled back, questioning the condition of the interior. @larson3912 inquires whether the vehicle actually has fuel injectors, questioning its specifications for 1976. @DocMGL asks about refinishing on the driver's side and any attempts to address electrical issues, showing skepticism about the car's overall condition. There is a general tone of caution among some commenters, indicating uncertainty about the car's history and current state.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its exceptional color and overall specifications. @Robert.C mentioned that the car is 'lovely' and appreciated the rarity of the standard colors compared to the more common PTS options for GT3s and 4s. @QD32 and @RussMcD3 both praised the 'outstanding color' and perfect specification, showcasing enthusiasm for the car's visual appeal. @dyp911e also commended the unique color choice, suggesting that it would look even more impressive in daylight. Overall, there was a strong consensus that the vehicle is a beautiful and well-thought-out example of Porsche's engineering.
Neutral: Several comments sought additional information about the car, particularly regarding its features and condition. @ninja_van1sh inquired if the car was wrapped in PPF (paint protection film), while @ethanlynne asked about the possibility of getting paint meters. @MPal shared a parallel experience with local dealers inflating prices, reflecting on market conditions. @GUR89 asked for more sunlight photos and videos to get a better sense of the car's color, indicating a desire for further insights beyond the initial images. These comments suggest that potential buyers are showing interest but desire more clarity and transparency about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: A few comments expressed skepticism or concern about the vehicle's pricing and visibility. @SlowNRusty noted the high sticker price and questioned the value of the GT4RS, indicating a sense of apprehension regarding the cost associated with such vehicles. @wstaab and @mikedorsch discussed the implications of the vehicle's warranty status, suggesting that this could deter potential buyers if they felt uncertain about the warranty being voided after a non-Porsche dealer sale. Additionally, @Schnellste raised a concern about a potential electrical issue, wondering why the dash was cutting out at higher speeds. Such comments reflect some apprehension surrounding the vehicle's overall integrity and market positioning.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @KriegerFord_Cbus_Ryan described the vehicle as "super neat," expressing excitement about its appearance. @linderpat complemented the vehicle by calling it a "gorgeous Shelby" and shared that he enjoys driving his own Mustang, indicating that this car would be fun to drive. @GarySmithHonda (The Seller) acknowledged @linderpat's comment with appreciation, referring to the car as very beautiful and wishing good luck with the bidding.
Neutral: @newcarpro provided a comprehensive set of specifications about the vehicle, including warranty information and build details, indicating it is a 2007 Mustang Shelby version with a production date in October 2006. @Dothetime inquired about any potential dealer fees associated with the sale in Florida, while various users questioned the vehicle's identification numbers and authenticity related to the Shelby 427 details, indicating a search for clarity.
Negative: @cobramjl raised a concern about the absence of a CSM number, suggesting it is critical for collectors when determining a Shelby's authenticity. @Standyman pointed out that the car did not undergo work from Shelby American and questioned the legitimacy of the Shelby 427 designation. @F117 echoed this sentiment by saying the car's participation in the Shelby 427 event was more about attendance rather than actual modifications pertaining to the 427 package, leaving some ambiguity around the vehicle's status as a collectible.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @krosa2112 described the Fiat 124 as beautiful, praising its deep burgundy color paired with the saddle interior. @dparnas acknowledged that the trunk light issue is likely a simple fix, suggesting it could just be the bulb or a disconnected wire, which reflects a positive approach to minor problems. @johnncb (The Seller) provided thorough disclosure regarding the trunk light, noting that he checked the bulb and ordered a replacement, demonstrating transparency in communication about the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: @johnncb (The Seller) stated that the power and torque of the vehicle at his elevation are adequate, especially compared to the 1800 block, reflecting a satisfactory performance aspect. Commenters like @trcassidy and @F124sport noted the importance of such honesty in transactions, expressing a hopeful sentiment towards sellers who are transparent about their vehicle's condition. @johnncb (The Seller) further clarified that there is no rust on the car, as it was a California car and has been stored indoors, which adds a neutral assurance about the vehicle's upkeep.
Negative: @dparnas mentioned that additional cranking is normal for carbureted cars, hinting at a potential inconvenience for buyers who may not be familiar with such vehicles. @Lizzbill raised a concern about rust, indicating some buyers might have lingering doubts about the car's overall condition even after assurances from @johnncb (The Seller). The trunk light issue, raised by multiple commenters, suggests a minor frustration, though it seems to be a manageable problem rather than a reflection of the car's overall quality.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is highly praised for its fuel injection system, with comments highlighting its efficiency compared to carbureted models. Commentors appreciate the modern technology that enhances the driving experience, making it smoother and more reliable.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifications, such as @zak asking if it is carbureted or fuel injected. Such questions indicate that potential buyers are gathering basic information to assess whether the vehicle meets their preferences and needs.
Negative: No significant negative comments were found regarding the vehicle. The comments mainly consisted of inquiries and factual responses without any critical feedback.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @bflory mentioned that the convertible top is in excellent condition, indicating that it is rarely put up because of the enjoyment of the car's convertible aspect. Furthermore, @bflory noted that the speakers are loud and clear, providing a good sound experience. The original radio, which is still in the box, also comes with the car, adding value to the vehicle's audio setup.
Neutral: @phheitlinger1 inquired about the condition of the convertible top, the AC's cooling ability, and whether it has been converted to 134A refrigerant. Additionally, @phheitlinger1 asked about the sharpness of the pictures and the condition of the clear coat. @bflory responded to these inquiries, stating that the AC does blow but is not super cold and that he is unfamiliar with the R-134A conversion.
Negative: @phheitlinger1 expressed concerns about the sharpness of the car's pictures and the condition of the clear coat, questioning whether it was deteriorating in places. There was also an implication of potential issues with the AC cooling, as @phheitlinger requested clarification on this aspect. However, these concerns were addressed by @bflory who confirmed that there is some minor discoloration where the hardtop sits, but no major issues with the clear coat.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments highlight the extensive documentation provided, with @blubusdrvr noting the impressive number of pictures available for the listing, indicating strong seller transparency and pride in the vehicle's appearance. @driveaclassicnotaplastic (The Seller) emphasizes the car's performance, affirming it drives smoothly, with no unusual noises and is currently road legal. Additionally, @driveaclassicnotaplastic mentions the car will be polished and documented before delivery, which adds further reassurance about the quality buyers can expect.
Neutral: There are various requests for inspections and further documentation throughout the comments, illustrating potential buyers' interest in quality assurance. @davearm raises questions about the accident history and repair details, suggesting a cautious approach by prospective buyers. @Knucklemuggy inquires about potential paint discrepancies, which indicates some buyers are scrutinizing the vehicle's cosmetic condition closely, though the seller attempts to address these concerns.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism about the vehicle's accident history, such as @davearm's question regarding why there have been no records since 2018 and the limited mileage since the accident. Further doubts are mirrored in comments about the color matching, with @Knucklemuggy indicating potential inconsistencies. Additionally, @popo85 succinctly mentions the salvage title, potentially a red flag for serious buyers who might be deterred by such a designation.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments emphasize the high quality and performance of the vehicle, with @ArtThomas noting that it is a great and fun car, sharing a personal connection as he owns an identical model. @Vitaminc914 expressed amazement that the car was not attracting higher bids despite its beauty and performance, referring to it as a stunning ride and the best color for a Mercedes. The seller, @DJF1965, also reinforced the car's appeal, highlighting its smooth acceleration and perfect handling, along with a reassurance that the car would be enjoyable for the new owner.
Neutral: @DJF1965 acknowledged a request from @Latandatt for a video demonstration of the car's ABC suspension system and promised to deliver it soon. After some confusion regarding the request, @DJF1965 agreed to create a detailed video once the car was back from service at Mercedes Grapevine, where he was getting a new key. Additionally, @Gone2Hunt inquired about the number of previous owners, indicating a curiosity about the vehicle's history without providing a definitive answer.
Negative: In the midst of positive remarks, there were concerns noted by @Latandatt who pointed out potential issues with using the 'rodeo mode' given the car's age, suggesting it may not be recommended for a 20-year-old vehicle equipped with the ABC system. @Vitaminc914's comment reflected a sense of surprise and disappointment at the lack of bids, implying that the vehicle was undervalued compared to its market potential. Furthermore, @DJF1965's comment about the unrepaired key indicated a slight frustration, despite his optimism about the car's eventual sale.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @drbarks praised the car's absolutely beautiful color combination, echoing sentiments from @sampietv who also admired this aesthetic. Furthermore, @rgd27 (The Seller) noted that the seats looked really good, indicating satisfaction with the overall appearance and condition of the vehicle. The comfortable seating was also confirmed by @rgd27, who mentioned that both he and a friend found the seats adequate during their test drive.
Neutral: In terms of functionality, @jward71 raised several questions regarding the passenger seat and radio functionalities. @rgd27 (The Seller) responded that all adjustments on the passenger seat worked, except for movement backwards, likely needing some attention due to infrequent use. He also clarified that the radio operates correctly but does not illuminate, and he expressed that the sale was prompted by a recent disability preventing easy access to the car.
Negative: On a negative note, @sampietv pointed out a common issue with Aston Martins where the bottom seat cushions tend to appear saggy, an observation that @Speedraser attributed to the environmentally-friendly foam underneath rather than the leather itself, suggesting an inevitable deterioration over time, especially in warmer climates. Additionally, @Cannonball1971 informed that the 2007 Vantage's passenger seat lacks height adjustment, which may create visibility challenges for shorter passengers. Queries from @Vettes91 about service records and particulars on the stereo system indicate some concerns regarding maintenance and technical specifications.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed their excitement and satisfaction regarding the 2013 Land Rover LR4 being auctioned. @8675309D praised the quality of the vehicle's photos, expressing appreciation for a well-presented listing. @Runman shared positive personal experience with the same model, highlighting its performance reliability over long road trips and its capability both on and off-road. @Treizerxh also shared enthusiasm, asserting that the engine seems strong and predicting it to be a great buy for the winning bidder.
Neutral: The seller, @AutoBaz, has actively engaged with potential buyers by providing detailed information and answering queries about the vehicle. They clarified the absence of the HD Package in response to @Emmgeekay's request and mentioned that service records are limited to the Carfax report. They provided additional media for interested bidders, further supporting their transparency regarding the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Some potential buyers expressed concerns regarding specific maintenance history. @SleepyBoy inquired about the replacement of coolant crossover pipes due to their known susceptibility to failure, but the seller could not confirm this from the available service records. Additionally, @Mike36953 raised a question about the timing chain, hinting at reluctance about the vehicle's maintenance despite low mileage, which may leave some bidders uncertain.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as a "Fabulous Firecracker Red Wagoneer Custom" and appreciates the interior, while @MikeMidwest calls it a "Beautiful rig!!!" and admires its aesthetics. @RamFlex shares similar sentiments, expressing that it is a great-looking Wagoneer, particularly noting the thin woodgrain and attention to original details. @Assam suggests that minor upgrades would bring the vehicle to perfection, further affirming its allure.
Neutral: @RoscoePDogg (The Seller) provides background on the Wagoneer, detailing its history as an unaltered '77 model that had a mild life as a plow truck. He emphasizes that it is solid, has a strong running 401 engine, and rides well with accurate mileage. He offers transparency about its performance and has invited questions from potential bidders, including videos to demonstrate its condition and operation under various circumstances.
Negative: Concerns arise with @Tire_kicker asking about possible overheating issues with the engine, suggesting potential flaws in the vehicle’s performance. @mperrone questions the seller regarding their quick selling after a recent purchase, suggesting possible dissatisfaction or issues. @Wheels4life inquires about the state of the AC, hinting at uncertainties about the vehicle’s features and their functionality, which may deter some buyers.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Beans_Bacon expressed excitement about the opportunity to own a Grand National, mentioning they loved seeing these cars on the road. @Locksmith661 praised the high-quality work done on the vehicle, crediting Lou for his expertise on Turbo cars and lamenting his retirement. @SwissBliss also displayed enthusiasm, saying all they ever wanted was a Black Grand National and encouraging potential buyers to seize the chance to own one.
Neutral: @Reloader1 (The Seller) provided insights into the vehicle's history, stating it had approximately 64,963 miles when purchased in 1992 and was mainly driven to events and shows, with a total of 108,854 miles reached by 2013. They noted it was capable of passing smog tests in California when it was still licensed there, with every test passed at street settings. @mortrac inquired about the car's smog compliance, while @DCcardshark speculated on whether current modifications might prevent passing smog in California.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car's emissions compliance, with @DCcardshark suggesting that the modified fuel system and aftermarket chip would likely prevent current smog compliance in California. @2swoosh asked for specifics on the car's best track performance, hinting at uncertainty about its racing history. Additionally, @MichaelB made a comment about the integrity of previous bidders, suggesting a negative impression of the auction atmosphere.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed high enthusiasm for the 1997 Mercedes-Benz SL600, highlighting its luxurious features and low mileage. @FastCarLover74 shared their admiration with a simple emoji, while @calisomb enthusiastically exclaimed their affection for the V12 engine, suggesting that the car is highly desirable. @whipcity76 praised the car's elegant color scheme and powerful performance, stating it's a fantastic choice for the discerning Mercedes driver. They also shared their long-term satisfaction with R129 models, suggesting a strong endorsement for the SL600's quality and performance.
Neutral: The seller, @2FAM, provided detailed information about the vehicle's features and its condition, indicating the car has been well maintained and stored in climate-controlled facilities. They replied to various inquiries about financing and the condition of the paint and interior, noting that there might be some cosmetic work done but not due to necessity. They communicated openly, indicating that the leather trim might have water stains and explaining that some minor issues need to be looked at further.
Negative: Some concerns about the vehicle's condition were raised by potential buyers. @trizzo212 pointed out visible water stains on the leather trim, which @2FAM acknowledged without being able to pinpoint their cause. Additionally, @neolife questioned the condition of the front grille and mentioned potential cosmetic issues, while @larry_harmon compared the reported mileage discrepancies between the listing and Carfax, raising concerns about the vehicle's history. Overall, while the car is highly sought after, there are issues buyers must consider.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dollycat3 described the vehicle as absolutely superb, while @xavierjohn noted that the car and its owner have been part of his car club for decades, emphasizing its beauty and reliability. Another comment from @taz178 praised the aesthetics of the car, highlighting its beautiful colors and expressing admiration for the unique pinstriping. Additionally, @lbs found the vehicle to be gorgeous, suggesting a high appreciation for its overall appearance.
Neutral: @bernieg (The Seller) provided detailed restoration information, emphasizing new components and work done on the vehicle including engine rebuild and a rebuilt transmission. Commenters like @BJ8Healeys discussed the authenticity of the engine, noting the complications due to the missing serial number tag but providing context on how to verify its originality. @threeducs3 also requested more photos, specifically of the car in sunlight, reflecting a desire to explore its features further without expressing a strong opinion either way.
Negative: Concerns were raised by several commenters, including @thecooter who criticized the quality of videos shared, suggesting better formats and platforms for showcasing the car. @RangerDanger24 mentioned that the paint appeared rough in some pictures, indicating potential visual flaws. Finally, @Okjab expressed curiosity about the decision to replace the frame, finding the new frame possibly oversized, while also questioning the routing of the fuel line, suggesting issues with safety or practicality.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle's unique story and features, with @letthegypsyhaveit emphasizing a preference for this model over a brand new Dodge. @Camarocrazy highlights the significance of the car's background, praising its association with a rare event that adds to its collectible status, and commending Dodge for accommodating previous owners affected by the fire incident. Overall, there is a sense of excitement and appreciation for both the car's specifications and its history.
Neutral: Comments include inquiries and casual interactions about the car's details, such as @bluesky questioning the color which @clv22p clarifies as TorRed. @Gmcintosh asks for specific video content related to the car's performance, showcasing a typical buyer interest in the vehicle's functionality. This dialogue indicates that while there are no strong opinions being formed about the car, there is genuine curiosity from potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments indicate skepticism about certain inquiries, particularly from @9literviper, who questions @Gmcintosh's intentions behind asking for videos just before the auction ends, highlighting a trend of low-balling bids on multiple vehicles. This negativity contrasts with the overall positive feedback about the car, suggesting frustration with some potential buyers' behaviors in the auction space and the nature of their requests.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beautiful aesthetics and condition. @MarkMontana referred to it as a 'beautiful bird,' indicating a strong visual appeal. Similarly, @Rockabillykid and @Scout60 praised the car's color combination and beautiful features, requesting additional footage to appreciate it further. @Dollycat3 and @lincolnsandcaddies complimented the car's family-owned history and its exceptional allure. @boaboyoz described it as a 'lovely Largo Thunderbird, regal in Rangoon Red,' and @Eartha1000 shared her nostalgic experience with a similar car, emphasizing the smooth ride it provided. Overall, the vehicle has garnered positive attention for its aesthetic qualities and heritage.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific features and provided requests for additional details about the vehicle. @gsuburban brought up the topic of the A/C system, questioning its presence, while @mauiade noted the lack of functional window visuals in the provided photos. Questions regarding the car's overall functionality, including whether all windows operated properly, were also raised by @corvettom9 and @Danlockemy, showcasing an interest in the car's mechanical aspects. The seller, @bobcole58, made multiple clarifications about the car's features, including its window functionality and maintenance history.
Negative: Concerns regarding the car's mechanical issues and potential need for servicing were highlighted in several comments. @gsuburban pointed out the absence of an A/C compressor under the hood, suggesting that the convertible likely does not have A/C. Additionally, @Chip55 mentioned intermittent issues with the window switches, sharing a personal experience with similar problems. @Danlockemy expressed frustration over the need to see videos of the power windows functioning and the engine running. @bobcole58 acknowledged some of these concerns, admitting that the passenger window was not operating correctly and planned to have it repaired. These comments indicate a level of uncertainty around the vehicle’s mechanical reliability despite its appealing exterior.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters admired the aesthetics and craftsmanship of the vehicle, noting its beautiful design and attention to detail. @walrusiam appreciated the lack of rear view mirrors on the fenders, while @pasorodder praised the silver and red color combination and the gorgeous Rudge-style wheels. Furthermore, @TheBen and @milage highlighted the quality of the replica and the classic color scheme, respectively, contributing to a positive consensus about the overall look and finish of the Speedster.
Neutral: Discussion around the vehicle's specs and performance led to several inquiries and clarifications. @Vetteguy7 and @TUFFER both inquired about horsepower ratings, learning from @GorgeousTobyFlamethrower that the engine is rated at 145hp, suggesting that is sufficient for the vehicle's weight. Other commenters, such as @nofat95 and @RS60Spyder, sought more information about the vehicle's wheels and whether they were chrome or polished, leading to informative responses from the seller regarding the components and their functionality.
Negative: While most comments were favorable, there were a few inconsistencies and concerns raised. @Vetteguy7 questioned the accuracy of the speedometer and whether the registration was current, to which the seller explained that the speedometer is GPS-based and the vehicle is registered in Washington, DC. Additionally, @letthegypsyhaveit posed a rhetorical question, implying that the classic Speedster might be seen as a better option than newer, pricier cars like a Porsche, a comment that hints at potential skepticism about the car's value compared to modern counterparts.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Multiple commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and overall condition. @SuperKram described it as a beautiful 2-door with the right options and colors, specifically noting its first year of selectable Auto4WD 4x4. @DStone4320 also praised the truck as fantastic and well taken care of, suggesting that it has been maintained properly during its ownership. @Barndoor98 (The Seller) shared that the Tahoe has never been detailed or off-roaded, emphasizing its 'true California vehicle' status and the care it has received.
Neutral: There were several inquiries and technical questions posed by potential buyers, indicating a strong interest in the vehicle's history and maintenance. @gauldingr asked about the intake manifold gaskets and the presence of rear seat headrests, to which @Barndoor98 (The Seller) promptly confirmed that the headrests were available. Other commenters, like @Eastcoast880 and @tbsnole, raised concerns regarding potential issues like the intake gasket repair and signs of rust around the hood area. @Barndoor98 responded to these concerns by sharing maintenance details and historical context about the vehicle's care and use.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's previous repairs and its pricing. @gauldingr noted the high cost of shipping from California, reflecting a possible dissatisfaction with operational logistics. Similarly, questions about the repeated intake manifold gasket repairs raised eyebrows about the vehicle's maintenance history. Commenters like @Tigers196884 questioned the price point for a 1998 Land Cruiser compared to the Tahoe, indicating potential overvaluation concerns. @Barndoor98 acknowledged the repair issues but also expressed frustration about their costs, suggesting that the maintenance could have been more efficient.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments regarding the vehicle highlight some strong positives, particularly about the vehicle's sound system and functionality. @StevMont80 expressed curiosity about the speakers and Bluetooth, to which @lanierchris (The Seller) confirmed that they sound excellent and everything works properly. Additionally, @aggmu received a affirmative response for a cold start video and a driving video, indicating that the seller is proactive and accommodating in showcasing the vehicle's capabilities.
Neutral: Some discussions were centered on the vehicle’s instrument cluster. @Skykinc queried about repairing the inoperable gauges, to which @lanierchris (The Seller) explained that the entire instrument cluster needed a replacement. @mfu77 also inquired about a lift kit and the reason for not repairing the cluster beforehand. It was clarified by @lanierchris that the vehicle does not have a lift but features a factory automatic height control suspension and that the cluster repair is planned with a replacement already sourced.
Negative: Concern arises from the need for repair in the vehicle’s instrument cluster. @mfu77 questioned why the cluster wasn’t fixed earlier, indicating frustration or skepticism about the vehicle's condition. While @lanierchris assured that the replacement was on the way, it raises potential concerns for buyers regarding the thoroughness of repairs before sale, as there may be doubts about the overall quality and readiness of the vehicle.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CobraVic11 praised the vehicle as beautiful and wished the seller good luck with the sale. @PDXnonHipster expressed nostalgic admiration, noting how he finds the car drool-worthy now that he is older. @lincolnsandcaddies also highlighted its stunning appearance, wishing the seller good luck. @JaDawgPNW described the car as a head-turner and stunning, showcasing a shared excitement among viewers. @pmirp1 commented on the outrageous beauty of the MK V, stating it stands out compared to other vehicles.
Neutral: @Dduanee inquired whether all components of the car were functioning correctly, seeking clarity on any potential issues. In a reflective comment about personal memories, @SiHawk shared a nostalgic story about his father's similar vehicle, indicating a personal connection to the car's model. @Wazojo111, the seller, reassured viewers that everything works as it should, and detailed that the radio, power antenna, and windows function smoothly, among other operational features.
Negative: @frankrigor asked a specific question about whether the cigarette lighters worked, which could suggest concern over the vehicle's functionality. @KatieKlean's comment was flagged as non-constructive, indicating that there may have been critical or dismissive sentiments regarding the comments on the vehicle.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Beans_Bacon shared their enthusiasm for the vehicle, expressing love for it. @newcarpro highlighted its practical design with barn doors, while @Discobob praised the attractive two-tone color, calling the Suburban lovely and wishing everyone good luck. @mmurphy147 described the vehicle as absolutely stunning and also extended good luck wishes.
Neutral: @Stoneledge (The Seller) provided a video link showcasing the vehicle and specified details about the ride height levels, which may interest potential buyers. @KiwiNic raised a practical question about accessing the middle row of seats, indicating curiosity about the vehicle's functionality. @mike_rockwell noted the vehicle's innovative air system and praised its overall appealing build, while acknowledging the configuration of the third seat. Additionally, there was a correction regarding the transmission; initial confusion was clarified by @Stoneledge (The Seller) and further confirmed by @gordon906 and @91W350, indicating that it is indeed a TH 200R4 instead of a TH350.
Negative: @gordon906 pointed out a potential discrepancy concerning the transmission type, questioning the indicated TH350. @Dirtygarage inquired about the inclusion of old California plates, possibly indicating a concern about the vehicle's history or authenticity. Overall, some comments seemed to reflect a level of skepticism regarding specific technical details, even as those expressing concern received timely responses.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's history and performance. @53jd reminisces about how impressive the Ralt RT5 was during its competition years, remarking on its dominance in the Super Vee category. @Madreindeer shares that he custom-built a model of this car, celebrating its long-standing lap record at Indianapolis Raceway Park. @shopteach023 reflects on his positive experiences with the RT5 and describes it as a 'proper race car', indicating that the buyer will not be disappointed with their purchase.
Neutral: Asking questions about the car and sharing insights, several commenters engage with the seller about the vehicle's specifications and condition. @parky inquires about the horsepower, to which @Brevent (The Seller) confirms it is approximately 200+, sharing details about past engine performance. Others, like @Ironman3358 and @JR4857, pose questions regarding restoration options and the condition of the tub, prompting helpful responses from @Brevent (The Seller) regarding resources for restoration and the original state of the vehicle.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the sale of the car, with @ScoobyDone suggesting the seller may regret selling the vehicle later. Questions about the lack of spares, raised by @wheezer, hint at uncertainty about the car's future racing potential without additional components. Additionally, @Dwait expresses curiosity about ownership history and whether Mark Smith still possess the vehicle, which could suggest hesitation around the car's provenance.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg commented on the vehicle's appearance, describing it as great looking, while @Nibo appreciated the brilliant color combination of the car in sunlight. @GTAuto, the seller, expressed excitement about the auction, inviting potential buyers to ask questions and enjoy a driving video to showcase the car's performance, which @cdwatnsu reaffirmed as driving well based on prior service history. The news that the AC was recharged, making it blow cold again, was also met with enthusiasm from @Stagehand and @cdwatnsu, signaling a positive turnaround for the vehicle.
Neutral: Some comments presented neutral feedback, focusing primarily on the technical aspects of the vehicle. @cdwatnsu and @jeffs3820 noted concerns about the misalignment of the car's 3 pointed star badge and E320 badge. @73oldsgold mentioned that the Smoke Silver color seemed different from the original, prompting a discussion about its authenticity. Additionally, inquiring about the air conditioning's functionality and the suggestion of minor checks before sale indicated a general curiosity about the car's operational status.
Negative: However, there were several negative remarks regarding some vehicle details. @Cireisa pointed out potential repairs needed for the sagging roof and expressed concern over the low oil pressure at idle, which could indicate underlying issues despite the vehicle looking nearly perfect. Additionally, questions about the biodegradable wiring harness raised concerns for potential buyers, with @Jonfrancis sharing a personal experience of a prior vehicle with electrical failures. These installations could influence buyer confidence even as the seller assured no current electrical problems existed.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg describes the vehicle as a 'fantastic XJS V12 2+2 Convertible in Black over Barley,' suggesting a strong admiration for its aesthetic and classic appeal. The positive sentiment is reinforced by @Drivin101 (The Seller), who refers to the car as 'a true beauty' and maintains an inviting and engaging tone throughout the comments, indicating pride in the vehicle and readiness to assist potential buyers.
Neutral: @Drivin101 (The Seller) provides detailed information about the vehicle's condition, mentioning that the engine bay was professionally steam washed over a year ago and remains clean. The seller addresses concerns from @billyblyth regarding potential oil or fluid leaks, clarifying that while there is some oil spotting typical of V12 engines of that era, it hasn't been an issue causing fluid top-ups after multiple trips, suggesting an overall positive outlook on the car's mechanical condition.
Negative: There are no overtly negative comments regarding the vehicle, but @billyblyth's inquiry about oil or fluid leaks indicates a cautious approach by potential buyers concerning maintenance and reliability. The seller's reassurance may mitigate concerns, but the initial question reflects a desire for transparency about the potential issues associated with aging vehicles.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @5692carguy mentioned that the vehicle has a great smell, stating that there are no unpleasant odors such as moisture, mildew, or smoke. This indicates that the interior of the car is well-maintained and appealing, which can be a significant positive aspect for potential buyers.
Neutral: @Thr3Mtns inquired about any recalls concerning the vehicle, reflecting a common concern among buyers about vehicle safety and history. @CTA also requested walk-around and driving videos to get a better sense of the vehicle's condition and performance, which shows interest from potential buyers but no specific opinions about the vehicle's quality.
Negative: @5692carguy responded to @Thr3Mtns' question about recalls by stating that he is not aware of any current recalls for the car. This lack of information could raise concerns among buyers regarding the vehicle's reliability and safety. Furthermore, the absence of other specifics about the car's condition might imply that there are significant details that are not being addressed.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @AMG_Fanatic (The Seller) enthusiastically describes the Astro van as a unique and special vehicle, mentioning its low mileage of 53k and excellent condition, both interior and exterior. He highlights the comfort of the plush leather seats and the high-quality wood finish, making it an ideal choice for long road trips. The seller notes the attention the van attracts and the positive comments he receives from bystanders, and expresses excitement about finding a new owner who will enjoy it on American roads this summer.
Neutral: Several commenters engage with @AMG_Fanatic, seeking clarifications on technical aspects of the van, including its AWD system and the compatibility with California smog regulations. @Smooch48 asks for tire codes, while @Streamliner inquires about the towing capacity and rear seat functions. Commenters show interest in the entertainment system, with @Justinway probing for input options, and @almondeyes65 requesting additional photos of the vehicle as part of their consideration process. @AMG_Fanatic responds to these inquiries by providing detailed information, updates on the shooting of a driving video, and plans to smog the van, keeping potential bidders informed.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about regulatory compliance, particularly regarding California smog tests. @ski.dive expresses skepticism about the van passing these requirements, while @Tirefriar emphasizes the seller's responsibility to provide a smog certificate. @militarydave35 and others question potential leaks or issues with the vehicle, with @rjchinfamily requesting confirmation about rust on the body and structural integrity. Further concerns are raised about the vehicle's age and whether it has had previous smoke exposure, though @AMG_Fanatic clarifies it has never been smoked in.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @vfnrcc (The Seller) emphasizes their experience in the car industry, stating that they have over 49 years of expertise. They take pride in handpicking vehicles presented on Bring a Trailer, focusing on quality, uniqueness, and authenticity, which resonates well with car enthusiasts. The Seller also highlights their commitment to transparent communication, ensuring that potential buyers receive accurate information and assistance throughout the buying process. Additionally, the Seller reassures bidders about the vehicle's excellent condition by mentioning the thorough test-drive conducted before the listing and their decision to sell with 'No reserve.'
Neutral: Commenter @washdup compliments the vehicle, the xc60 T6, and suggests adding a driving video that highlights the vehicle’s dynamics and sounds without narration, to enhance the viewing experience. @mariano_espagnol expresses interest in the vehicle by asking specific questions regarding service history and the status of various components. @UscPhd97_ inquires about the air conditioning, timing mechanism, and tire date codes, highlighting common concerns potential buyers might have regarding vehicle maintenance and safety.
Negative:
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @tomcaremi (The Seller) expresses gratitude for viewers of the auction and provides a transparent overview of the vehicle's history, including its purchase and the reason for selling. The seller highlights that they acquired the vehicle in March but quickly realized it wasn't the best fit after relocating to Florida. This level of transparency seems to build trust with potential buyers, as noted by @dluxhog who emphasizes the importance of honesty from the seller.
Neutral: Detailed information is provided regarding the vehicle specifications and history. The comments include a breakdown of the delivery date, vehicle model, and various option codes, which could be useful for potential buyers. Additionally, @newcarpro contributes valuable information about the vehicle's official details and service contracts, but does not express strong opinions about the vehicle itself, keeping the tone neutral.
Negative: Concerns arise about the vehicle's past accident, as noted by @Pacheco167, who requests additional pictures of the damage to assess its condition. The seller's mention of the accident in the Carfax report, while fully repaired, raises questions among some users about the extent of the damage and its impact on future reliability. @Autoguy65's comment is flagged as non-constructive, indicating some criticism towards the interaction and possibly suggesting skepticism on the part of potential buyers.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @wyatt1948 (The Seller) describes the motorcycle as absolutely perfect, emphasizing its condition and climate-controlled storage, which suggests it has been well cared for. @Raylc shares positive feedback from their own experience with the same bike, indicating that many owners may have trouble fully enjoying their motorcycles, which hints at the bike's high quality and enjoyability. @66GTconvorigownr mentions it's a beautiful ride and wishes the seller good luck with the sale, reinforcing the bike's aesthetic appeal and desirability.
Neutral: @wyatt1948 (The Seller) notes that this specific motorcycle is rare, being one of only 999 built, which could intrigue potential buyers looking for something unique. Several questions from potential buyers are directed at @wyatt1948 (The Seller) regarding the service history, tire conditions, and features of the bike, showing that the vehicle has ignited curiosity and concern about its specifications and maintenance status. @BR_549 inquires about various aspects of the motorcycle, indicating a genuine interest in understanding what the bike offers.
Negative: @66GTconvorigownr expresses a facetious remark about the bike not having self-driving capabilities, implying some confusion or disappointment regarding the bike’s features. @BR_549 raises concerns regarding the absence of GPS navigation, which seems to contradict an earlier statement that suggested it was included, leading to some potential buyer confusion. @wyatt1948 (The Seller) acknowledges that the first service hasn't been completed and doesn't have a tuner added for the bike, which might deter buyers looking for a fully serviced vehicle.
|
1k-Kilometer 2023 Ford Mustang Shelby Centennial Edition Coupe
Shelby Centennial Edition
Lot 196799
Private Party
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous positive remarks from enthusiasts. @watergate528 excitedly referred to it as a "Sharp Shelby!" and @EGuyer1521 expressed love for its vibrant red color, noting that they had mainly seen these cars in green. @Wilks complimented the cool seats and overall design, contributing to the car's appeal. @Lawrie, the seller, acknowledged these compliments, indicating a strong appreciation for the positive feedback, particularly from fellow enthusiasts, and shared that he is happy to assist potential buyers with export processes, showcasing his commitment to customer service.
Neutral: Several comments raised neutral inquiries about the vehicle. @Knuckles-R-Busted asked about the import procedures to the United States, while @BigFrank sought clarification on the currency of the listed price, whether it was in U.S. or Canadian dollars. These questions highlight potential buyers' interest in logistical details surrounding the purchase and exporting of the car. @Sumar48 introduced a query regarding the total production numbers of a specific model but provided no further details, leaving the discussion open-ended without additional information.
Negative: There were a few negative comments concerning the car's presentation. @Lawrie, the seller, noted concerns shared by some viewers about the car's condition, particularly mentioning that potential buyers might be deterred by pictures of dirty aspects such as the underside of the vehicle. This points to a common concern that visual presentation can significantly impact buyer interest, suggesting that the seller needs to consider cleaning efforts to better attract prospective buyers. Overall, while the car's specifications are impressive, some details about its condition could hinder sales.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Lowbid2 (The Seller) described the CLK 500 as a great opportunity to own a classic, powerful Mercedes coupe that still turns heads. The previous owner invested over $5,000 into addressing all the known issues typical of these models, bringing the car into excellent mechanical condition. The seller, who is downsizing after recently retiring, emphasizes that the car is in great shape after only 1.5 years and 6k miles of usage.
Neutral: Several commenters have expressed their observations on the vehicle without strong opinions. @militarydave35 inquired about any potential leaks and asked for date codes on the tires, while @AMM57 offered a neutral comment regarding the color of the wheels, mentioning that while they are not their preference, the coupe is still attractive overall. @Lowbid2 (The Seller) responded by assuring that there are no leaks and noted that the tires were installed by the previous owner when the car had 39,329 miles.
Negative: @Choopie remarked that the cost for an oil change on the vehicle seemed excessive, suggesting a perception that maintaining the car may require a higher investment of time or money. Similarly, @Lowbid2 (The Seller) acknowledged that the car is 21 years old, implying that some aspects of the maintenance and upkeep may not meet contemporary expectations. @AMM57 also criticized the choice of black wheels, signaling a disagreement with the aesthetic choice.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm about the 2024 Subaru BRZ, highlighting its capabilities as a fun and sporty coupe that is both affordable and enjoyable to drive. @Caymanorcarrera referred to the vehicle as awesome for those seeking a modern sports coupe. @L8BR8K shared a similar sentiment, expressing love for their own BRZ and praising its lightweight, rear-wheel drive design, along with the improvements it offers over previous models. @JIMSCAT, the seller, noted that the BRZ is a spiritual successor to his beloved MGB GT, emphasizing its sporty and utilitarian nature, and describing the car as having plenty of power for exhilarating drives without the complications of turbocharging.
Neutral: Comments also noted details about the vehicle that highlight its practicality and features. @JIMSCAT (The Seller) explained that the car was supplied with a jack and lug wrench but lacked a spare tire, prompting him to find a solution for that. Additionally, he mentioned the installation of a K&N cold air intake system, with the awareness that it's not CARB certified and offered to reinstall the original system if needed. The seller also pointed out the effective catch can system installed to manage potential coking issues in the engine, illustrating a proactive approach to vehicle maintenance and care.
Negative: Some comments indicated concerns regarding the limitations of the BRZ, particularly around its back seat space, as noted by @JIMSCAT who mentioned it being more suitable for dog travel or young children in car seats. @snarge suggested considering a rear seat delete kit for those who don't need the extra seats, to streamline the interior. The seller addressed minor cosmetic issues, mentioning three nicks on the front fascia due to highway mileage, indicating some expected wear and tear but maintaining that the car is in good condition overall.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic and quality. @boaboyoz describes it as an 'exquisite elegant Ellensburg Fifteenth Series Packard' and praises its delightful characteristics. @billyblyth highlights the Packard's sophisticated design and reflects on the brand's commitment to quality, mentioning how the car serves as an entry-level model that still embodies style and taste. @Dirtrack49 and @Capt._Doug commend the restoration work on the Packard, noting its high standards and visually appealing attributes. Additionally, @Cheetobum admires the car's gorgeous color, contributing to the positive sentiment surrounding the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments delve into technical aspects of the car while maintaining a neutral tone. @Cal-T (The Seller) provides detailed responses to inquiries about features such as the vehicle's oil leak, directional lights, and vintage restoration history. There are also discussions regarding the vehicle's driving performance, with @koolcar asking specific questions about its cruising capability and rear end height. The conversation includes historical insights about the Packard brand, particularly its Canadian production history discussed by @The_Engineer and @David_P, highlighting the community's interest in understanding more about the car's background.
Negative: There are some concerns raised about the vehicle's condition and performance. @BigRiveDave inquires about the severity of the oil leak mentioned by the seller, while @MbarBCattleLLC points out what appears to be a hole in the headliner over the driver's door, which @Cal-T clarifies is actually just a penetration for the sun visor. @koolcar also questions the height of the rear end and its performance in modern traffic, suggesting a potential issue with how the car handles at higher speeds. Overall, while these comments do not detract drastically from the positive reception, they illustrate that potential buyers have valid inquiries requiring clarification.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters are impressed by the craftsmanship of the vehicle, with @Erioc highlighting it as a show car noting the amazing craftsmanship involved. @40fordlover remarked on the extensive design and thought put into the build, expressing hope that it sells for a fair price. Others like @stugottz and @Big_Ragu conveyed deep appreciation for the build quality, with @stugottz calling it a magnificent creation deserving of the 'People's Choice' vote. Additional remarks from @wastedrubber and @sax97mugentyper also emphasize the car's aesthetic beauty and overall appeal, with praise for its display and design features.
Neutral: Several comments seek more information about the vehicle's specifications, particularly the horsepower, with @Todd6699 inquiring if the vehicle had been dynoed. @mattchojnacki (The Seller) responded, estimating the horsepower based on detailed specifications and upgrades made to the engine. There are also inquiries regarding the car's fuel cell size and operation, with @VanishingPoint2 expressing curiosity about practical aspects like fuel filling. The seller provided answers to these questions, including details about the performance and the vehicle's fuel system, indicating a high level of organization and readiness to engage with the audience.
Negative: While many comments are positive, there are some neutral inquiries that come off slightly critical. For example, @nanderson0 commented on a dent seen in the front passenger wheel well, which led to clarification from @Ark79bronco about its true nature, revealing it as a design feature rather than damage. Additionally, a user like @Rinkerbert questions the existence of running videos, seeking further engagement from the seller. This indicates a desire for more transparency or media to verify the quality and functionality of the vehicle, leading to a potential oversight in fully showcasing the car's capabilities.
|
45k-Mile Individual British Racing Green 2019 BMW 750i xDrive M Sport
WBA7F2C58KB240305
Lot 196802
Dealer
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @stylepergallon expresses a strong preference for this vehicle over high-end luxury brands, praising its distinguished qualities and color. @jamestielsch shares excitement with a simple WOW!, while @jboji514 admires its specifications. @Vogelsang calls it a gorgeous car but makes a small correction regarding its model designation, which @genevamotorcars (The Seller) confirms. Commenters like @hl1177 and @campodf also appreciate the car's unique paint color and overall condition, with @displaying enthusiasm about its rarity and low mileage. @cpa713 describes it as absolutely stunning and a gem, while @hobbsm3 concurs, sharing their admiration for the British Racing Green color. @dukey compliments the car's performance and handling, reinforcing its appeal to BMW fans.
Neutral: Commenters such as @genevamotorcars (The Seller) clarify details about the vehicle and its configurations, providing information on its key fobs and tire specifications. @CountDookoo turns the conversation towards technical aspects, confirming engine updates, which @genevamotorcars (The Seller) also addresses. @C3wA inquires about the availability of Apple CarPlay, prompting a confirmatory response from @genevamotorcars (The Seller). Discussions about the uniqueness of certain features and specifications arise, reflecting varying levels of technical interest among commenters, leading to productive exchanges.
Negative: While many comments are positive, @3Kees seems slightly disappointed about the car's color choice, hinting that they would prefer a silver model with a black interior. @Pace_Adorno raises concerns about the tire replacements noted in the vehicle's Carfax report, suggesting a level of uncertainty regarding maintenance history. Additionally, @dukey points out the engine power discrepancy, noting that this model has less power than a newer version. Such critiques reflect a cautionary tone among some commenters regarding specific aspects of the vehicle's condition and performance specifications.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Z28MIKEY (The Seller) emphasizes the smooth and powerful performance of the 2003 Marauder, mentioning that the engine is so smooth you can't even feel it idle and highlighting the ice-cold air conditioning. He also notes that the vehicle has a thick layer of stage 1 ceramic paint, which he claims is vibrant and immaculate. Fellow commentor @maw06 agrees, pointing out the car's smooth, comfortable ride, great highway cruising ability, quiet and roomy interior, and relatively good fuel efficiency. @longmire45 nostalgically recalls the appealing extras that originally came with the Marauder, while @letthegypsyhaveit expresses a desire for the classic model over new Ford vehicles.
Neutral: Commentor @Mercuryman raises important questions about the vehicle's history, noting that the Carfax report indicates five previous owners and various dealers having sold the car. He inquires about the refresh frequency of the air suspension and its compressor, suggesting concerns about the vehicle's condition. @Z28MIKEY (The Seller) provides answers regarding tire specifications and condition, stating that they are OEM sizes and have 80% tread remaining. Commentors also note the limitations on the original owner's accessories, with @Excursion reflecting on the possibility that previous owners may have kept some items.
Negative: While the overall sentiment about the Marauder is positive, @Caddyrauder points out that more close-up pictures of the exterior paint could improve potential buyers' understanding of the car's condition. Additionally, @Mercuryman shares his own experience with air suspension maintenance, which raises concerns about the reliability of the suspension system in the Marauder, hinting at the challenges that buyers might face if the air suspension has not been properly maintained. These concerns prompt a dialogue about the practicality of owning such a model with a somewhat complicated system.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ski-doer expressed interest in the Jeep, complimenting it as a nice vehicle and asked for a video demonstrating the functionality of all five windows. @adamhumberview confirmed that the 4WD system is fully operational, but mentioned that the A/C requires a condenser. They also provided a link showing the windows functioning correctly, which highlights the seller's engagement and willingness to provide detailed information about the vehicle.
Neutral: @Wammer noted that they have always loved this type of Jeep and are excited about the possibility of owning it, indicating a general enthusiasm for the vehicle. @WagoneerFan commented positively about the overall build, mentioning aspects such as the impressive frame-off repaint and engine rebuild while also seeking additional details about the skid plate and lift kit, which shows a keen interest in the vehicle's modifications and history.
Negative: @WagoneerFan raised several concerns about the lack of detailed information on the fuel system and the misleading video provided for the window operations, suggesting that not all windows functioned as claimed. They questioned the A/C system's status, noting the original compressor in pictures and inquired about any conversions that may have been performed. These comments signify skepticism regarding the completeness of the information shared about the vehicle.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @jrabun (The Seller) shares that the vehicle has been a fantastic car that drives amazing and is in full working order. Several commenters, including @R185 and @kevlarblue, express admiration for the car's specifications and performance, noting it is a rare find with desirable features like the upgraded instrument cluster and M Performance exhaust. @expeditionportal praises the vehicle's potential as a future classic and highlights the great driving experience of similar models, while @DaveDep affirms its remarkable handling and upgrades, suggesting that one must drive it to truly appreciate its quality.
Neutral: @Caddyrauder and @MackDivaS6 ask for more details about service history, maintenance, and the reason for sale. @jrabun (The Seller) explains that the car's maintenance has been kept up with, mentioning that all service was done at BMW dealerships and that the cabin air filter replacement was the only recent service declined. The seller also confirms the presence of features like a backup camera and park assistance, responding to @APCJr's inquiries regarding this equipment.
Negative: Concerns from commenters like @MaxS01 emerge about possible incidents and damage history, specifically referencing an incident report from 2018 and a dent in the rear left door. @IrishSprings warns @jrabun (The Seller) that selling the vehicle might lead to future regrets. Additionally, @jrabun notes that he does not have the original window sticker, which could be seen as a drawback for some potential buyers. Overall, while the comments are largely positive, these concerns highlight the importance of transparency regarding the vehicle's history.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dollycat3 expresses excitement about the vehicle, referring to it as gorgeous, which showcases a positive reception. @Stuttgart_Steel notes that despite having a high mileage vehicle in his own collection, he enjoys driving it more than a newer model, indicating a strong appreciation for the driving experience. @Rocky925 shares a personal story about enhancing the performance of his own E300 TD model, highlighting the fun aspect of driving such vehicles and enhancing their appeal.
Neutral: @Kevinbriem comments on the condition of the vehicle, referring to it as a time capsule and suggesting that while it's beautiful, it may not be practical for long road trips—this comment maintains a balance between admiration and caution. @MBOFBILLINGS (The Seller) emphasizes the rarity and value of the vehicle, stressing its low mileage and original condition, which aligns with the neutral stance of presenting facts about the car's allure to potential buyers.
Negative: @Dlamb911 raises concerns about potential issues with the vehicle's performance, specifically questioning the cold start and suggesting there might be a throttle body problem, which introduces a negative note regarding reliability. Additionally, @Kevinbriem implies that while the car is impressive, he doubts anyone would actually use it for long drives, hinting at concerns of practicality over pure admiration.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @JB1971SX expressed interest in the vehicle as a potential hassle-free daily driver perfect for someone experiencing a mid-life crisis. @VantageAuto (The Seller) shared that the Eos is a unique convertible, reminiscent of the Volvo C70, but more enjoyable to drive. The seller highlighted its features such as the 2-liter turbocharged engine, power retractable hardtop, and a clean non-smoker interior with only 19k miles and 17 service records, emphasizing that it is a rare find in such good condition.
Neutral: Several commenters sought further clarification on the vehicle's condition and service history. @Rheilenman inquired about the timing belt and DSG transmission servicing, while @kandunorsk requested more information regarding reported damage, particularly the front bumper repairs. @Uby67vw1958 asked about the aftermarket radio and if the original was available, signaling a desire for authenticity.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @emelvee about potential leaks in the model, while @Thriftyscot pointed out a loose wire on the driver's side windshield pillar, questioning its function. Additionally, @Rheilenman commented on the lack of service records for the timing belt, suggesting some hesitance around the vehicle's maintenance history.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Vic (The Seller) presents the vehicle as a beautiful 190 that runs and drives well, with notable features such as a rare sunroof option. @39Ford commends the car as a beautiful example with great attention to detail and mentions the appropriate window tint. @Dollycat3 also praises the car, highlighting its great condition and unique factory options, expressing enthusiasm over its originality.
Neutral: Several comments indicate intrigue about the numbers seen in one of the pictures. @Dollycat3, while expressing admiration for the car, questions the purpose of some numbers, which @MistahDAV clarifies are for converting speed measurements from KPH to MPH. @Vic (The Seller) acknowledges that these were added by a prior owner and can be removed easily.
Negative: @CTT raises concerns about the condition of door and window gaskets, questioning if there are leaks when exposed to rain. @Vic (The Seller) admits uncertainty about leaks since the car has never been outside in the rain, but reassures that they have not noticed any leaks while washing the car. This acknowledgment of potential issues with the vehicle’s seals introduces a note of caution for potential buyers.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the RX-7, with @funkaholik calling the interior a "time capsule" and indicating it appears well-loved, while @mtx392 believes the vehicle is "super solid" and likely has accurate mileage. @JayDavidson notes the car's excellent condition supports the 19,000 miles showing on the odometer, and @baltzerc suggests that the old tires which may be original help substantiate the seller's mileage claim. Overall, there's a sense of appreciation for the car's condition and its history, with many feeling it is a rare gem worthy of preservation.
Neutral: The discussion around the vehicle's mileage raises questions, with @Pee-Zee and @SteveNC8888 expressing suspicion about the odometer's credibility. @giorgitd inquires about service receipts to verify mileage, while @Packard8 looks for documentation regarding maintenance given the car's long-term storage. Various commenters note a desire for more clarity on the vehicle's features, such as the sunroof, and @deniselynne (The Seller) provides context about her husband’s preservation of the car and efforts to clarify concerning the mileage.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding potential discrepancies in the vehicle's history, as commenters like @Redawgleader and @58healey450 point out the lack of documented maintenance and the possibility of rust from extended storage. The authenticity of the sunroof is questioned, with @Scullym and @ToyBox1 expressing doubts about whether it is factory or aftermarket. Additionally, @tyggyr and @58healey450 highlight missing air conditioning components, which they believe should be clarified for potential buyers, signaling caution regarding the car's mechanical status despite its low mileage.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the 2013 BMW 128i M Sport, highlighting its engaging driving experience and overall balance. @Ocoanater noted that the vehicle closely resembles their ideal specifications, while @HiFiGuy appreciated the attention to detail and performance enhancements made by Wile Motorsports, which were echoed by @IsaacsRacing, who described the 128i as a joy to own. Other enthusiasts, like @bkilburn814 and @Michaewh, reflected on their experiences with similar models, emphasizing the unique analog, driver-focused nature of this car that they find lacking in newer models.
Neutral: The seller, @shortribs_40th, detailed the vehicle's ownership history, describing their purchase experience and subsequent upgrades, including suspension and maintenance work. They offered transparency about the car's condition, addressing concerns raised by commenters regarding minor cosmetic issues like a scratch and some wear on interior panels. The conversation also touched on the vehicle's operational history, with a focus on service records, SULEV emissions warranty coverage, and mechanical reliability.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, some commenters expressed concerns over the 128i's power compared to the more robust 135i. @SteveSylvester questioned the vehicle's suitability as a sporty option, pondering why it would be a better choice than a 135, which he feels has superior acceleration. Furthermore, @MTN supported the 135i's advantages in terms of performance while acknowledging the 128i's handling characteristics, creating a nuanced debate about the merits of each model. Overall, while the community appreciates the 128i, questions remain about its performance capabilities relative to alternatives.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Avernier (The Seller) showcases a deep affection for the Datsun S30, having owned it since 2012 and meticulously upgrading it for both performance and comfort. Commenters appreciate the stylish build, with @Deathplants emphasizing its beauty and @cfrost praising the innovative aspects of its design. Overall, many feel that this car represents a well-executed restomod project that will benefit the winning bidder, with kudos for its exterior appearance, engine upgrades, and thoughtful modifications.
Neutral: Some commentary focuses on technical details, including the adjustable coilovers discussed by @DrCrash and the car’s performance specs provided by @Ssvirk. There are inquiries about additional components and the practicality of modifications, with @LOVECARS50 expressing curiosity about the noise levels inside the cabin and whether original seat rails are installed. @Avernier (The Seller) is responsive to these queries, providing detailed explanations about the car's features and its evolution through the bidding process.
Negative: A few concerns are noted, such as @LOVECARS50 questioning the noise level inside the cabin compared to a modern vehicle, indicating it may not be as comfortable as contemporary cars. Additionally, comments about potential adjustments to the driver and passenger seat heights raise some issues about comfort for different driver sizes, as @Daheeb points out potential discrepancies in seating height. While most comments are positive, it’s evident that some buyers have practical queries that could impact their bidding decisions.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its impressive aesthetics and performance capabilities. @Antboss highlighted the impressive build of the vehicle, referring to it as one of the favorite '79 Camaros they have seen. @MarkBartlett compared its appearance to the Batmobile, suggesting it had an attractive and menacing design. Other users like @1889 and @Marcon1 expressed excitement about the car's sound and vibe, labeling it as 'sinister' and likening it to a 'mad max darth Vader vibe.' Commenters also noted its potential for fun experiences, with @Captain101 remarking that it is a 'smiles per-gallon car.'
Neutral: Several questions sprung up, revealing a curiosity among the users about specifics related to the car's performance and modifications. @Dave06466 and @The_Underhill_Account both inquired about horsepower and the weight of boost, while users like @sbpetrok and @Jtamburin were concerned about the car's streetworthiness and features like A/C and brakes. @tybo0009, the seller, frequently provided details in response to these inquiries, indicating that the car is designed to be streetable and has cold A/C among other features.
Negative: On the flip side, some commenters expressed skepticism about the price versus the value of the modifications in the vehicle. @Antboss pointed out that the final selling price may not reflect the investment made in the car. Additionally, questions about the car's practicality, such as potential scraping issues raised by @ERR1979 and @The_Underhill_Account, suggested concerns about its suitability for everyday driving or track use. Comments about needed modifications for safety, particularly regarding harness strap placements raised by @The_Underhill_Account, hinted at a perception that the vehicle may require further adjustments to meet safety standards.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Winefan94941 highlighted the extensive maintenance work done on the vehicle, including a significant engine reseal that amounted to over $23,000 in retail repairs, ensuring potential buyers of the vehicle's well-maintained state. @robenku (The Seller) confirmed that the Porsche Certified Pre-Owned Warranty is transferable, valid until 2026 with no deductible and providing comprehensive coverage for various systems, enhancing the appeal and reassurance for interested buyers. @robenku (The Seller) also shared impressive fuel efficiency figures, noting city mileage around 22 mpg and highway mileage reaching lows of 30s and a peak of over 37 mpg during a trip, which suggests the vehicle is economical.
Neutral: @CottonClark and @campodf engaged in a discussion regarding the wheel size, with @robenku (The Seller) stating the change to an 18" wheel was a personal preference, inspired by a specific vehicle build. @campodf mentioned their experience with downsizing from 21" to 19" wheels for improved ride quality and reduced weight. Other commenters like @ssunnylee24 pointed out the benefits of larger tires, while @ScoBud1 inquired about the fuel mileage, which @robenku (The Seller) expertly addressed, showing transparency regarding the car's performance.
Negative: @Bavaria911 raised concerns about whether the vehicle was used for towing and whether the transmission case was regularly serviced. Such inquiries can imply doubts about the vehicle's condition and history, potentially affecting buyer confidence. @garybres sought clarification about the completion of diesel emissions modifications, which could indicate lingering concerns regarding compliance and potential mechanical issues associated with the previous emissions controversy.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @tesoffice expresses enthusiasm for the color combination of the vehicle, indicating it as a favorite feature. @ACDarata commends the seller for taking care of vital servicing and having complete records available for potential buyers, complimenting the car's specifications and overall appeal. @FXRcR1 highlights the opportunity for buyers to acquire a well-maintained M156, praising the meticulous care given to the car to ensure its quality, and @GDogg shares his admiration for the CL63, particularly the Arctic White color with Cashmere interior, wishing the best for both the seller and the future owner.
Neutral: Several commenters are seeking clarification on various technical aspects of the vehicle. @billyblyth inquires about the age of the tires and any front suspension work that may have been performed, while @Jamesk58 asks about the functionality of the Black-series lifters and potential for reverting the ECU tune for smog compliance. @koblesCar raises questions regarding rear leg room, asking if the front seats are adjusted all the way back or if there is genuinely no space in the backseat.
Negative: Conversely, some comments suggest concerns about the practicality of the vehicle's rear seating. @koblesCar expresses doubt about the legroom available in the back, questioning the car's suitability for adult passengers, while @georgepehanick, drawing from experience with multiple CL AMGs, explains that the back seats might not accommodate full-size adults comfortably. The ingress and egress of the backseat is described as problematic, leading to the conclusion that while the vehicle is a luxury performance coupe, it lacks user-friendly rear seating.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @AJL1988 (The Seller) presents a stunning 2023 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 3LZ Z07 convertible, which is in excellent condition with only 373 miles and a full factory warranty still in effect. The car's striking torch red exterior paired with a jet black leather interior makes it a highly desirable vehicle. It comes fully equipped with about $24,395 in options, including premium features like the Z06 Ultimate Performance Package, carbon aero components, and additional luxury interior finishes. It is described as a true 1-owner car with all original documents, key fobs, and accessories included, establishing an impression of quality and meticulous care from the seller. @AJL1988 (The Seller) emphasizes a commitment to transparency and quality, assuring potential buyers of the vehicle's condition and history.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @newcarpro and @gdepaulaesilva, engage in discussions regarding the specifics of the car, including its delivery and field action updates. They highlight aspects such as the car's service history and open field actions related to a serial data gateway module, clarifying that this is not a recall but a Customer Service Program. @AJL1988 (The Seller) confirms that these updates have been completed to maintain the vehicle's integrity and functioning. The conversation reflects a keen interest in the car's specifications and operational history, with bidders appreciating the detailed information provided.
Negative: There is some anticipation regarding the vehicle's sale price and market conditions. Commenters like @badcad and @1meankar express skepticism about potential depreciation or market manipulation for future models, indicating a nervousness about the vehicle's resale value given its age. @TurboRoberto's inquiry about why a car with such low mileage is for sale and @gdepaulaesilva's inquiry regarding paint protection film, also suggest some uncertainty about the vehicle's use and condition, though they are met with thorough responses from @AJL1988 (The Seller), emphasizing that the car remains in pristine condition.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the car's unique features and its rarity. @SSLotus appreciates that it's a rare original owner Elise, noting that most have changed hands multiple times, and he loves the color, stating it looks even better in person. @Freidell (The Seller) received praise for the tasteful modifications, including the OEM forged wheels and the specific Sport Pack configuration without the touring pack. @Freidell's responses about the vehicle's condition, such as confirming he has the original window sticker and both keys, reinforce the impressiveness of his well-maintained Elise.
Neutral: Several users ask for more specific information or photos, indicating a keen interest in the car's details. @cyirush queries whether @Freidell still has the window sticker, while @jmsuter requests pictures of the car with the top off. @Freidell's promise to provide these images suggests a willingness to engage with potential buyers about their inquiries. Additionally, @Longshot19 brings up past issues related to mice damage, but @Freidell clarifies that the repairs were done thoroughly, highlighting transparency in the car's history.
Negative: There are concerns regarding the car's past, with @Longshot19 questioning the extent of prior electrical issues caused by rodents and whether there are lingering odors. Other commenters, such as @gmonkee, note apparent confusion regarding the roll bar and suggest it may not be an actual roll bar but a harness bar instead. @cptjon raises practical concerns about the car's air conditioning performance in Texas heat. Overall, while the enthusiasm for the Elise is evident, some negative comments reflect anxieties over its previous damage and functionality.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their long-standing admiration for the Yamaha RZ350, with @RidleysRides emphasizing that age should not deter someone from acquiring one. @ktm_rick proudly mentioned that at 62, he still enjoys riding his RZ350 and appreciates the nostalgic scent of two-stroke oil. Additionally, @Gio1966 shared that his bike runs excellently, especially with the modifications made for high altitude, highlighting the bike's performance and appeal.
Neutral: Some discussion focused on the technical aspects of the bike, including the jetting for different altitudes. @Jamminjimmy and @Gio1966 exchanged insights about jet modifications required for optimal performance at sea level versus high altitudes. The seller, @911r, provided updates on video content showcasing the bike's operation and confirmed its location in Scottsdale, AZ, while other commenters requested information about the carburetors and additional modifications.
There were also remarks about the bike's adjustments for emissions compliance in California, indicating a level of interest in the bike's legal status on the road.
Negative: Concerns arose regarding the legalities and proper setup of the bike, particularly about the two-stroke engine's compliance with California regulations as noted by @eman_308. Additionally, @Noble2 raised questions about the incompatibility of the aftermarket carbs with the original setup, worrying about potential issues with jetting and oil pump integration. Some commenters reminisced about regretting past sales of similar bikes, such as @LenLanetti who recounted a sad story about a friend wrecking his bike shortly after purchase.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @carfan1978 expressed appreciation for the car's transformation, noting it looks great despite the work involved in changing the interior parts and vinyl roof. @EddieNap also complimented the aesthetics of the car, indicating it is gorgeous in any color combination. @Kidsixpack shared enthusiasm for the Mopar's color combination, reminiscing about owning multiple similar models and praising the car's appearance. Overall, many comments highlight the beauty and desirability of the vehicle, making it a standout among enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Plum70 raised an inquiry about the body stamping numbers and engine details to help clarify the car's modifications. @Rmetz29 commented on their personal struggle to find a specific model like this one, expressing a mixture of admiration and disappointment. @2FAM (The Seller) assured that all requested information would be gathered and shared, emphasizing transparency in the sale process. The comments reflect an interest in verifying the car's authenticity and history, which is crucial for potential buyers.
Negative: @caozman expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle's authenticity, questioning the utilization of parts from two rare 1971 models and pointing out potential red flags, such as the appearance of the fender tag. @boat3 added concerns about the originality of the engine and body VINs, indicating they don't match the details expected for a 1971 Challenger. Additionally, @BrooklynBeer criticized the decision to dismantle rare vehicles for parts, suggesting a lack of respect for the historical value of those cars. These comments convey caution from prospective buyers about the vehicle's integrity and the importance of thorough due diligence.
|
|
|
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors generally praised the vehicle for its unique qualities and history. @bobm45 expressed admiration for the seller's efforts in preserving and rebuilding the car, pointing out the impressive mileage differences between their experiences. @chrisstraus reminisced fondly about their own experience with the GTV, highlighting it as a favorite car over decades of ownership. @platzman celebrated the rarity of features like the ‘Blue Ball’ shifter, indicating a strong interest amongst enthusiasts. Furthermore, @Hushpuppy55 noted the car's beauty and loved history, showing an appreciation for its condition and allure.
Neutral: Several comments revealed a mix of curiosity and detailed inquiries about the vehicle. @Zeke asked about the miles since the engine changeout, while @Neilv sought information on the choice between Spica and Weber systems directly from the seller, @Largo. @3066james and @cwood13 discussed modifications and state regulations relevant to carburetor changes, reflecting a knowledgeable community engaged in the technical aspects of the vehicle. @Watry mentioned the availability of parts and how the car adheres to emissions regulations, indicating that the community is actively involved in maintaining compliance and understanding the vehicle's technical realities.
Negative: A few comments noted concerns and criticisms regarding the vehicle's ride height, with @bleeder commenting that the car appeared to sit higher than expected and questioning the effectiveness of the lowering springs. @Ratedarrgh echoed this sentiment, speculating on possible issues with the spring setup. Additionally, @Largo addressed comments regarding the engine's status and modifications, clarifying the discrepancy around the original and replacement engines, which might have sowed some confusion. Overall, while the vehicle garnered admiration, these points suggest that not all aspects are entirely favorable or clear-cut.
|
|
|