Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Thelastone called the car amazing and the best GT40 they've ever seen. @Doctodd described it as a great-looking car with perfect styling, wheels, and color combination. @KJDFGT referred to the car as spectacular, gorgeous, and raw, expressing admiration for its visceral nature. Several commenters, including @racedeck and @ViperNC, shared their exhilarating experiences driving similar models, emphasizing the excitement the car delivers. @hungry mentioned that the car is hard to stop looking at, highlighting the timeless appeal of Shelby and Superformance models.
Neutral: @1600veloce (The Seller) provided detailed information about the car's specifications and features, explaining that it had been well-maintained and was stored in a climate-controlled facility. @christophernkennedy asked about unique features of the 50th Anniversary Edition, demonstrating a curiosity about the car's history and the reasons for its low mileage. Others, like @BloodyHell and @mrjirey, engaged in clarification discussions about the modifications made to the vehicle and its pricing compared to market value, showing an analytical interest in the car.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concern regarding the high market price of the car, with @mrjirey and @tlc123 noting how quickly the bidding escalated beyond their budgets. @hinds57 mentioned a dislike for the addition of mirrors, indicating a personal aesthetic preference. @homejames72 humorously suggested sending their own vehicle to the seller’s facility for work, implying skepticism about potential service costs. While overall appreciation for the vehicle is clear, these comments reflect hesitation about affordability and specific design choices.
 |
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning design and exceptional quality. @boaboyoz refers to the car as a "stunning Scottsdale C1" and praises its details, while @BigTanks acknowledges it as a spectacular C2. Enthusiastic remarks like @AutoCrazy's assessment of the car as 3automotive jewellery" and @Jlocke describing it as "absolutely gorgeous" reflect a general appreciation for its aesthetic appeal and craftsmanship. User @HankHorders expresses a desire to own the car, emphasizing its appeal and remarking on the potential joy of driving it daily. Overall, the comments exhibit a strong sense of admiration for the vehicle's beauty and build quality.
Neutral: Several comments provide factual observations or ask questions regarding the vehicle without strong emotional bias. @Yourk9guy questions why the car is being sold through auction instead of a direct deal, indicating a curiosity about the selling strategy. @Packard37 brings up an interesting note on the balance between being a purist and enjoying a well-built restomod. Additionally, comments from the seller, @casciomotors, are informative, providing details about upcoming driving videos and clarifying features like the windshield wipers, helping potential bidders gather more information. The dialogue among various commenters showcases a community engaged in discussing both the car's design and the buying process.
Negative: Some comments express critiques or concerns about the build and design of the vehicle. @JoeKretired notes the oversight in refinishing specific areas, which might detract from the overall quality of a high-value restomod. @305max adds a critique about the mixed-year elements, suggesting that the build could have used more authentic components. Additionally, @Classic_Garage mentions practical concerns regarding the difficulties of driving such a valuable and unique car, highlighting a fear of depreciation. @TCH75 points out areas of the car that may not align with purist expectations, which draws a distinction between the desire for aesthetic modifications and authenticity, indicating that not all onlookers are fully supportive of the design choices made in the restoration process.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight the overall appreciation for the vehicle, especially regarding its aesthetics and features. @GDogg described the Porsche 911 Turbo S Coupe as "Lovely" with great options and a high-end K40 Radar. @boaboyoz referred to the car as "magic" and applauded its beautiful GT Silver Metallic finish. @h_bakken noted the interesting design of the aftermarket wheels, and @Bingleys_Dad called the car "gorgeous," indicating a general admiration among potential buyers for its appearance and build quality. There's also a consensus that it has been well-maintained and is offered with desirable features, including the OEM wheels and an impressive Stage 1 Tune that enhances its performance.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarity on specific details of the vehicle, reflecting a general curiosity and due diligence from potential buyers. @AZ911 and @5senna5 both inquired about the status of the OEM wheels, receiving affirmative responses from @Frisco_TTS, the seller. @JHBBII was interested in the warranty status related to the upgraded software, and @Jtsbrs asked about potential blemishes noted in the vehicle's images. Overall, these comments exhibited a neutral tone, focusing on clarifying aspects that potential buyers might consider before making a purchase.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's potential history and warranty implications. @MikeyWoodz pointed out discrepancies in the vehicle’s records, suggesting it had a salvage history, though this was disputed by the seller. @Elouie also echoed a concern about the warranty being voided due to performance modifications, prompting a defensive clarification from @Frisco_TTS about the relationship between the tune and warranty status. These comments introduced a level of skepticism, particularly in relation to the car's prior ownership and the effects of added performance features on its warranty and resale value.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @adude praises the vehicle's beautiful '57 hardtop and attractive color combination, expressing his love for the car. @boaboyoz describes the car as a fine example and mentions the legendary status of the seller, wishing everyone good luck with the auction. @mike_rockwell admires the original color combination and describes the car as a real gem, expressing affection for the vehicle's aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: @buckb27 notes the absence of front disc brakes in the original listing, indicating that it needed updates. @GlennD46 and @Fuelieguy discuss the availability of a 4-speed shifter in '57 Chevys, expressing uncertainty but agreeing that earlier models likely didn't have them. Conversations also touched on specific details such as the seat back with the shifter and the changes that were made over time in vintage models, reflecting a shared interest in the mechanical aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: @zr1bill firmly states there were no 4-speed options in full-size Chevys in 1957, pointing out discrepancies in the listing regarding transmission details. @solidlifters raises a concern about the missing cross member/brace for the transmission, questioning how the vehicle's structure is being maintained. These comments highlight a level of skepticism regarding certain features of the car, suggesting that not all aspects are as originally represented.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Jags_in_the_barn highlights that the vehicle is ready to go with just a license plate, indicating its overall good condition for street registration. @jenlow2711 (The Seller) confirms that the car originally had a 1700 Ford Crossflow engine with Webers, marking its authentic racing lineage. Several comments appreciate the car's powerful performance, as indicated by @Kitcat7's reference to a dyno result of 182.5 hp and 156 lb-ft. torque, attributing it to a well-executed rebuild of the Zetec engine, making it a prime candidate for autocross and track racing.
Neutral: Commentators discuss the vehicle's specifications and history, with @Lbider questioning if the 2.0L engine changes the vehicle's historical designation. @LeadfootStyle inquires about the usage of the fuel cell, while @wdb notes the accessibility of components once the bodywork is removed. The discussion also touches upon the car's weight and past racing experience, highlighted by @jenlow2711's input on racing history and modifications. Comments like those from @G3gat indicate that the vehicle is primed for racing, but potential owners should be aware of the modifications made for this purpose.
Negative: Several comments express concerns regarding the legality and practicality of using the vehicle on the street. @59turner mentions a complicated VIN situation that may prevent street registration, while @Lannis warns against trying to convert a race car into a street-legal vehicle due to various state regulations. @SwiftFF5 points out that the car might not meet SCCA regulations for certain configurations, indicating that it might not be suitable for all buyers. Additionally, @Dake mentions potential complications with title regulations, hinting at the difficulties one might encounter when trying to register such a modified vehicle.
|
4,200-Mile 2014 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Super Snake Widebody Convertible
1ZVBP8KZXE5248181
Lot 197940
Dealer
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @lloyddon1 (The Seller) emphasizes the rarity and incredible condition of the vehicle, stating that it has the highly sought-after 850 HP option and comes with all original Shelby documentation. Several commenters, such as @pettyfan43 and @longducdong, also praise the beauty and uniqueness of the wide body Shelby convertible. Comments highlight the car's performance capabilities and the thrilling driving experience it promises, with @lloyddon1 asserting that it is 'turn key ready to go' and guarantees 'miles of smiles.'
Neutral: The discussion includes a mix of practical inquiries and informative responses. For example, @bobbydye asked about the car mats, and @lloyddon1 confirmed that the current mats are the only ones available, noting the option for custom-designed mats at an additional cost. Additionally, @mnchief4 raised concerns over the front seat width for larger individuals, to which @lloyddon1 explained that the car features Recaro performance seats, acknowledging the differences in fit for drivers. These neutral comments provide useful context for potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments touch upon concerns, specifically regarding the airbag rebuild mentioned by @riffraff, who questioned the necessity of the update. @lloyddon1 clarified that the airbag issue was a Ford recall affecting every Mustang and confirmed that this vehicle's airbag system has been resolved. Furthermore, @frankgt3rs asked if the car is street-drivable considering its power, raising doubts about handling high horsepower. Overall, these negative highlights reflect the importance of understanding the car's history and potential concerns for serious buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg praises the previous long-term ownership as a significant advantage for this "fabulous" Grand Prix White over Cashmere Carrera Coupe. @RumbleAuto expresses his desire for the car, stating it is "absolutely stunning in GP White." @cymbrk confirms having seen the car in person and describes it as "super clean" and well-maintained, complimenting the seller's honesty. Meanwhile, @boaboyoz calls it a "bloody beauty" and emphasizes that the vehicle should be desired by many. @Iznod (The Seller) describes the car as simply amazing and perhaps the best example of its kind, reinforcing the positive sentiments surrounding its condition.
Neutral: @vonmec raises questions about the car's paint, asking for a comprehensive paint metering, and later inquires about a specific picture that may show overspray. @British1 requests verification of the mileage through documentation, and @Michaelsmacd wants to confirm if the A/C is functioning properly. @Iznod (The Seller) responds to these inquiries with assurance, providing details about the vehicle's capabilities and maintenance history, including its mileage, service records, and the reasons behind its sale.
Negative: @Magdaddy points out a potential issue with the rear spoiler, suggesting it may be detached or broken—though he also calls the car beautiful and well presented. @stucati asks about past service records related to the valve cover reseal and clutch replacement, expressing concern about the engine's condition given the lack of a hoist for inspection. @ALW62 seeks a post of the previous PPI report for better transparency, highlighting a desire for more thorough information before committing.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the 2005 Chrysler Crossfire with many users acknowledging its exclusivity on the road. @a990dna remarked on the rarity of Crossfire convertibles, highlighting the unique style of the vehicle. @AutoCan expressed a love for their Crossfire Coupé equipped with a 6-speed manual transmission, sharing a video filled with information about their experience. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, emphasized the car's sleek design ideal for summer driving, demonstrating confidence in the vehicle's aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Several users engaged in discussions regarding inspection and logistics, indicating practical considerations in purchasing the vehicle. @Montu1969 requested confirmation on the car's condition, specifically asking about potential leaks or rear differential issues. Additionally, @nesterjo inquired about shipping costs to their location, while @Paul_Dietzel proposed taking public transport for a personal drive home after purchase, showcasing a more involved buyer perspective. @Collectibleclassics provided detailed responses to these inquiries, emphasizing their commitment to transparency and customer satisfaction.
Negative: While the comments predominantly focus on positive aspects, there is an underlying concern regarding the vehicle's condition and inspection details. @Montu1969 specifically asked about potential mechanical issues, indicating that some buyers may be cautious about the car's reliability. There are no overtly negative comments about the vehicle itself, but the inquiries hint at possible apprehension from potential buyers regarding maintenance and performance before making a purchase.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors expressed strong admiration for the vehicle's stunning specifications and overall condition. @GDogg highlighted its stealth appeal, while @The_Gentleman praised the rare Stealth model, indicating it's among the best available variants, and he appreciates the benefits of the PPF on the matte paint. @kcsteve (The Seller) emphasized the vehicle's maintenance history, confirming a full PPF system was applied, the condition is remarkable, and reassured potential buyers about the lack of curb rash and the car's solid performance.
Neutral: Inquiries regarding specific details about the vehicle were raised by several potential buyers. @Micks41 and others asked about the PPF status, the infotainment system compatibility with CarPlay, and other service history, reflecting a keen interest in necessary maintenance and warranty information. @Remy22 and @Whaaat sought clarification on the number of keys, maintenance records, and whether the tires and battery are original, which indicates they're thorough in their evaluation process, although the seller's answers may need more detail to assure potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's service history, with some commenters suspecting deferred maintenance due to lack of clear communication from @kcsteve (The Seller). @The_Gentleman mentioned possible costly service needs that may arise due to the vehicle's long service gap, while also pointing out the absence of specific service disclosures. This created a perception of potential issues that could deter buyers, with some suggesting that the seller's responsiveness may be lacking, further compounding concerns over the purchase.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments showcase a strong appreciation for the 1967 Corvette being auctioned by @steve0415. @Fuelieguy expressed excitement over the car's original features, suggesting it will do well due to its excellent condition. Several other commentators, such as @19seventy3vette and @darryldayton, highlighted the car's impressive documentation and original components, indicating its high potential value and desirability among collectors. The unique color and features of this specific Corvette, combined with the thorough and well-documented sales pitch from @steve0415, have left many viewers impressed and excited about the auction.
Neutral: There were informative exchanges between @steve0415 and other users regarding the specifics of the Corvette, such as the transmission and differential options. @kellvette pointed out a discrepancy in the seller's ad related to the differential type, which @steve0415 acknowledged and promised to correct. Additionally, @midyearnut requested further photos of the frame for clarity, but @steve0415 reassured him about its condition based on other observations and offered an opportunity for in-person inspection, reflecting a candid communication style between the seller and potential buyers.
Negative: While the comments are mostly positive or neutral, there are some concerns raised about the vehicle. @kellvette pointed out a potential misunderstanding regarding the differential options, which could indicate a lack of attention to detail in the advertising. @Lurvey also raised apprehensions about the frame condition, specifically asking about rust or soft spots, which could be of concern for buyers, especially in classic cars. @midyearnut's inquiry about the frame and its condition also suggests that not all potential buyers are convinced of its quality, indicating that there could be some hesitation regarding the car's overall originality and structural integrity.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The 1972 De Tomaso Pantera GTS has been well-received by commenters who appreciate its impressive provenance, especially due to its connection to the renowned motorcycle champion Giacomo Agostini. @RiffRaff highlights its 'hard-to-beat provenance,' while @tfrain describes it as "Pure badassery!" Multiple users, including @BoogieBones and @ripper996, express admiration for Agostini, suggesting that owning a vehicle with such a notable history adds to its allure. Comments such as @ImageStreetClassics' thoughtful responses to the unique aspects of this car enhance the excitement, and the seller's willingness to engage with potential buyers has been positively noted.
Neutral: Commentators made several observations regarding the car's details and specifications. @CarlCars mentions valuing the car based on condition rather than previous ownership fame, indicating a rational approach to assessing its worth. Some users, like @Edelbrock and @Hulk2000, raised pertinent questions around the VIN of the vehicle and its implications for provenance, hinting at the complexities of the car's history. The discussion includes technical feedback, such as a query regarding the color changes experienced by the vehicle, furthering the conversation about its characteristics and condition.
Negative: Concerns arose from various commenters regarding the vehicle's authenticity and the implications of its mismatched details. @sdjohn351 questioned the validity of the GTS classification, suggesting it might not fit the criteria. @Hulk2000 highlighted the importance of understanding why the original VIN was obscured, raising suspicions of the car's history potentially involving theft. Comments from users like @starrpainting indicate skepticism about the transparency of maintenance records and past ownership, reinforcing doubts among potential buyers about the vehicle's background.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Numerous commenters praised the 1977 F250 4×4 for its impressive aesthetics and overall quality. @Cammergalaxie noted that the truck's previous owner had put great effort into restoring it, resulting in a truck that still catches the eye and draws attention wherever it goes. @Themcclintock expressed admiration for the truck's appearance, while @Skillman25 commented on his familiarity with the seller's quality trucks, acknowledging this one as another excellent example from Montana. @HardTruckDriver also highlighted the seller's expertise, remarking on the truck's beauty and wishing luck with the sale. @CarDogThreePedals compared the truck's charm to classic pickup trucks from his fond memories, further emphasizing how captivating vintage pickups can be when they are presented well.
Neutral: The seller, @Cammergalaxie, has provided detailed insight into the condition of the truck. He confirmed that the vehicle was painted by a local shop and has a clean frame with matching VINs, thus giving potential buyers confidence in its integrity. He also mentioned that there is a single visible scratch on the bed's paint and some minimal rust issues at the bottom of the driver's door, but overall described it as a 'dry western rig' with no significant flaws. Comments such as those from @simonnightingale inquired about the tire size, while @KJNelly questioned the truck's reliability for long trips.
Negative: Despite the positive sentiments, there were some concerns raised by commenters. @KJNelly asked whether the truck would be reliable for a long-haul drive, expressing doubt about its performance on highways. @Cammergalaxie acknowledged that he hadn't tested it at higher speeds and recommended transport instead, citing poor cell service in the area for emergencies. Additionally, there were reports of minor issues such as an oil leak near the rear main seal and a small crack in the dashboard. @wspeed requested a photo of this crack, and @Cammergalaxie complied, indicating a willingness to be transparent about the truck's condition.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Rotaryrocket commented on the vehicle's great color combination and expressed love for the RX-7, mentioning its reliability and fun driving experience. @SupraFreak shared a similar sentiment, reminiscing about selling a car owned for over 30 years for comparable reasons, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. Many others, including @ChadBugg68 and @LAGAOB, praised the car's great driving capabilities and handling, recalling personalized experiences with RX-7 vehicles and commending the seller for maintaining such a beautiful example.
Neutral: @MPaletta (The Seller) explained the reasons behind the sale, including relocation and limited storage space. They described using the vehicle primarily as a seasonal car with good care taken during its ownership, and mentioned servicing that took place during periods of inactivity. @Just_me and others inquired about various features and potential issues, including wear and tear concerns, while some offered helpful suggestions on how to validate the car's condition further through pictures and documentation.
Negative: @Just_me raised concerns about possible rust, corrosion, and the condition of various components of the vehicle, suggesting it didn't appear to be regularly used in recent years. @Droog speculated on the seller’s intent, implying the sale might be a quick flip without transparency, while @Rx7collector criticized the engine bay's appearance and requested detailed evidence of its condition. @mbze430 and @ocpilot pointed out potential errors in documentation and representation, further stressing the need for proof of the vehicle's integrity.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg expresses excitement about the Eldorado Coupe's presence on BaT, anticipating its successful sale in Silver over Blue. @Johnammond thinks the vehicle would serve as the perfect daily driver upon his retirement. @Microeye shares surprise at finding a cloth interior, indicating a positive reaction to this unique feature.
Neutral: @randy3160 (The Seller) provides information about the car's purchase from Mecum Auctions in 2021, detailing its history as part of a large collection in a climate-controlled environment. He confirms that the car has maintained its original mileage of just 17,668. @johnjm appreciates the Cadillac color name, referring to it as Georgian Silver Metallic, further adding a layer of enthusiasm around the vehicle's aesthetic.
Negative: @texdave asks about potential issues with the car, including rust bubbles near the passenger side door and whether there are soft spots on the vinyl top, indicating some concern regarding the vehicle's condition. @inchoramile queries about the state of underbody corrosion, suggesting worry about any undetected damage. @415forever's question about the fan speed being stuck at a particular setting hints at mechanical concerns that potential buyers might have.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @buellwinkle expresses enthusiasm for the bike, calling it gorgeous and considering a bid. @DAAsher shares admiration for the bike's beauty and mentions owning a model from 2008, indicating a fondness for all versions of this motorcycle. @motoinfo highlights the impressive upgrades on the bike, describing it as stunning and lamenting not having similar enhancements on their own R12S, while predicting that someone will be thrilled with this R12S purchase.
Neutral: @deadbattery appreciates the Throttlemeister bar ends, giving them a high praise as "Chef's Kiss." @insideline comments on the seller listing multiple beautiful bikes but expresses confusion about the value of the 2007 R1200S, comparing it to another sold bike of lower mileage. @Sumser agrees with @insideline about preferring a mileage number that suggests regular use while also recognizing the bike’s upgrades as significant.
Negative: @insideline raises concerns about the higher mileage of this bike relative to its upgrades compared to a less modified but lower mileage motorcycle that sold at a markedly lower price. They wonder how this might affect the final pricing. Additional queries regarding possible cosmetic issues, such as a potential scratch on the rear left BST carbon wheel, are made, indicating a cautious approach to the bike's condition.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, praising its fun driving experience and Toyota's engineering. @Discobob highlighted the aesthetics of the Volks wheels, indicating they look great and enhance the car's appeal. @Supraman623 complimented the car's power output from the small engine, calling it beautiful, and reminisced about the potential for better fuel options in their area. @Collins4A shared a nostalgic connection to the driving experience, likening it to memories of an older car, stating that these vehicles are wonderful to drive. Overall, many users appreciate the vehicle's design and performance, with @Vtec4ever even mentioning it as the only car they would consider buying in the U.S.
Neutral: Some discussions surrounding the vehicle were focused on technical aspects and market predictions. @Kdonohue brought up oil change intervals, questioning the accuracy of the timing mentioned. Additionally, there was an inquiry from @hyperion917 regarding the impact of tuning on warranty and reliability, indicating various concerns for potential buyers. @skillman (The Seller) addressed these questions by confirming stock parts availability and discussing the tuning process, including clarifications about warranty implications and the car's maintenance history. Some commenters like @Slushie1998 speculated on the vehicle's market value, with varying predictions on how low the price might go, while others like @evolvng provided a realistic counterpoint regarding the current market conditions.
Negative: On the downside, there were comments expressing skepticism about the vehicle's perceived market value and the implications of modifications. @Collins4A questioned the likelihood of the car selling near the sticker price, with various commenters like @speedracer12 and @GLWA! echoing uncertainty about its final selling price. @HAPPY warned about potential warranty issues that could arise from tuning, suggesting that modifications could lead to complications with service claims, which might deter some buyers. @Rooster98198 even decided not to bid on the vehicle, though they complimented the seller on a watch, showcasing that while the vehicle has detractors, the overall aesthetic and quality of the seller's items holds some appeal.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Aubrey (The Seller) highlights the high credibility of their dealership by mentioning they are the '2024 quality dealer of the year for the state of Arizona.' They also offer a significant value-added feature with a five-year free maintenance program, which seems to be well-received and encourages potential buyers to bid with confidence. Their willingness to address questions further enhances customer trust and engagement.
Neutral: @LanceSC281 inquires about the applicability of the five-year free maintenance program for buyers living in Texas, indicating a potential interest but also a need for clarification. This question reflects a common concern among buyers regarding the limitations of service offerings based on location. Additionally, @wittwert requests more information about a possible issue with the vehicle's suspension, which illustrates the detailed scrutiny potential buyers apply, as they seek reassurance about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @wittwert also expresses concern by questioning the condition of the suspension and asking about any visible oil leaks, reflecting a level of skepticism that some potential buyers may have. @montentoyz raises a further concern regarding possible noises from the engine, specifically likening it to a power steering pump. This indicates that there may be lingering doubts about the vehicle's performance and mechanical reliability that could impact the sale.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the Hudson Italia, highlighting its unique styling and automotive history. @Dollycat3 referred to it as an amazing piece of automotive history that would be stunning when restored, while @NavyDave described it as super cool and restorable in the right hands. @Riskyrick suggested it could become a remarkable reimagined project with the right attention, and @Vtec4ever described it as the epitome of what the classic car community values. The sentiment was echoed by @MarkS, who praised the collaboration of American and Italian craftsmanship that produced such a rare gem. Furthermore, @Wob (The Seller) noted the availability of rare replacement parts and the potential value of restoring the car, making it an enticing project for collectors.
Neutral: Comments reflected a mix of opinions on the feasibility and approach to restoring the Hudson Italia. @Noahyjohn appreciated the car’s current patina and suggested leaving it as is, while @mid60soldsfan found the design interesting but preferred Chrysler's design sensibilities. Others pointed out the challenges of restoring aluminum bodies, with @39mercman emphasizing the skill required for such repairs, particularly for Touring Superleggera constructions. There was also acknowledgment that the vehicle could serve as both a unique project and a significant piece of automotive heritage, as noted by various participants who shared their experiences and thoughts about restoring similar vehicles.
Negative: Concerns regarding the restoration costs and the complexity of the project were prevalent among the comments. @Brucerudin detailed the expenses involved in achieving a quality restoration, suggesting that the figures provided by the seller seemed overly optimistic given the car’s condition. @TDR and @amscroth emphasized the significant financial investment required, with @TDR remarking on the difficulty of aluminum repairs and pointing out that sourcing or fabricating parts like bumpers could be particularly challenging. @maw06 humorously pondered the feasibility of a long-distance drive, hinting at the risks associated with attempting to restore and use such an ambitious project. Overall, while many see potential, there were cautionary tales underscoring the challenges ahead.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's overall condition and aesthetics. @Oldhockyplayr reminisced about their own experience with a similar car, highlighting the nostalgic elements such as the wooden steering wheel and shift knob. @Happy4Life described it as a 'diamond' that deserves more attention, sharing their appreciation for the specific color and presentation of the vehicle. @Wob (The Seller) endorsed the car as a 'stunning condition, fun to drive' option, calling it a favorite among the community, while @soquelz noted that it is a great example of a 240Z available for auction.
Neutral: Several comments discussed various components and features of the car, including the dust shield's function and terminology, with @craZee noting it was more accurately a 'dust shield' rather than a 'skid plate.' Others, like @phavriluk and @Pivo, shared insights about different configurations of Z-cars, linking it back to individual experiences with their own vehicles. @VioletPearl's inquiry prompted a detailed explanation from @adamthomas99 about a particular aspect of the car in the photos, indicating an engaged discussion among enthusiasts eager to learn.
Negative: A few comments pointed to concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @dmeyers60 raised a caution about painted undercarriages potentially hiding rust issues, insinuating that it could be a cover-up for underlying problems. @DerStig humorously suggested that this vehicle would likely sell for a 'ton of scratch' which may not be attainable, reflecting some skepticism about the auction's bidding environment. Overall, while the majority of the feedback was positive, these concerns hint at the apprehensions some potential buyers may have.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BigWoodsGarage (The Seller) presented a detailed and enthusiastic description of the 1997 F-250, highlighting its low mileage and excellent condition. The seller remarked that the truck has been well-maintained, allowing it to remain in great shape without the common issues associated with low mileage vehicles that have sat idle for years. Several commenters praised the truck's cleanliness, especially the engine bay, stating that it looks as though one could eat off it. @ChrisMacArkansas shared positive experiences from previous transactions with the seller, noting their helpfulness and the truck's impressive condition. Overall, there is a strong appreciation for the truck's reliability and potential as a collector's item among the community.
Neutral: Inquiries about the truck included questions from @dkaspic asking about the bed size, which @BigWoodsGarage confirmed to be a full-length 8-foot bed. Others wondered about the performance enhancements available for the engine, with suggestions from @Maverickr68 and @JT77 on modifications that could improve horsepower and torque. @kazda88 showed keen interest in the truck's specifications regarding the wheel lug pattern and discussed the variations in F-250 models. The discussion around these details reflects an engaged audience looking to learn more about this vehicle's specifications and performance potential.
Negative: Despite the overall positive tone, there were hints of disappointment due to the truck being located far from certain buyers, as expressed by @JayB93 who noted the distance from Texas. Some comments also pointed out that while enhancements like headers and timing adjustments could improve performance, these might not lead to significant improvements without changes in driving habits. @BR_549 noted that improvements to fuel economy largely depended on the driver's habits rather than just modifications, suggesting that while the truck is enjoyable to drive, its performance does not guarantee low running costs without careful management.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The Audi 5000CS Turbo is celebrated for its charming nostalgia and comfortable driving experience. Many commenters, including @lyonsvee (The Seller), express their fond memories associated with the car, describing it as a 'time machine' that evokes sentiments of the past. @dutchinterest praised the immaculate state of the vehicle, noting the seller's expertise in preparing cars for sale. The car's luxurious interior and reliability, along with its unique turbocharged engine and smooth transmission, also garnered admiration from previous owners like @bradyzq, who highlighted the overall joy of highway driving in such vintage cars.
Neutral: Several commenters provided insights and historical context around the vehicle, discussing features like the controversial three-speed automatic transmission as noted by @carfoollane and later confirmed by @johnjm. Commenters such as @nextyear recalled the earlier controversies surrounding Audi branded by a misleading media narrative, averting positive attention from the brand's engineering advances. Additionally, comments from @t44brian regarding the vehicle's true mileage sparked a clarification from the seller, showcasing the active discussion on the car's condition and history during the auction.
Negative: Not all feedback was entirely positive, as various commenters pointed out concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and features. @t44brian revealed that the odometer was broken, suggesting the actual mileage was higher than advertised. Doubts were raised about certain supposed features like the presence of antilock brakes, which allegedly were not equipped on this model. Some commenters, such as @Y2K911, mentioned known issues like the steering rack's durability, potentially compromising the vehicle's long-term performance. Others echoed discontent regarding the vehicle's executive performance capabilities, emphasizing a feeling that it may not meet modern driving standards.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @garthholsinger (The Seller) expresses appreciation for the bids and the positive responses from potential buyers. They highlight the meticulous restoration work done on the FJ62, mentioning they have used high-quality materials for the interior, which has been well received by @E911. The vehicle maintains a stock height, which some find appealing. The seller is proud of the mechanical restoration process and has invested significant time and resources to achieve the vehicle's current condition. @Jen_Hellrango and @ContSp68 also compliment the vehicle's beauty, indicating it has garnered positive attention among viewers.
Neutral: The seller, @garthholsinger, provides detailed information about the vehicle's history and condition, including its emissions status. They note that the vehicle has all emission control equipment intact but not connected, fulfilling potential buyers' questions raised by @Ghaziatassi about California emissions. The seller clarifies that the vehicle is registered in Nevada and addresses inquiries regarding the originality of certain parts, confirming that original components such as the rear view mirror and other trim pieces are included with the sale. Moreover, several comments suggest an inquiry into the vehicle's compliance with recalls and the specifics of aftermarket replacements.
Negative: There is a concern from @dfordman regarding whether the seller has addressed a past fuel tank recall, highlighting some hesitance about the vehicle's safety. @ghaziatassi raises a question about the possibility of the vehicle passing California emissions, which could deter potential buyers concerned about regulatory compliance. Additionally, @garthholsinger admits to a flaw in the upholstery, where a hard spot from clear coat spill exists, which the seller mentions can be fixed, but it may lead to worries about the overall condition and potential additional costs for restoration among potential buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is described as being in fantastic shape with incredibly low miles, making it a rare find. @Luke18917 (The Seller) highlights that the car has been meticulously maintained, with extensive service history available and recent extensive brake work done. Additionally, he mentions that the car feels amazing both physically and mechanically, confirming that it has been serviced to the highest standards, always hand washed, and loved as his daily driver for the last 6000 miles.
Neutral: Several commenters have posed inquiries regarding specific features and service history of the vehicle. @Westcoast2727 requested information about the tire date, maintenance records, and if it has sticky buttons. @Nld1966 also asked about the number of keys and service evidence for the timing chain. @Damaho912 raised a question about the availability of parts for older Land Rovers, to which @Luke18917 replied that local shops typically have parts available. This indicates a mix of interest and concern about the practicality of the vehicle regarding service and maintenance.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism about the vehicle's maintenance history and timing chain service, with @WAGONBOYTD pointing out that typically, timing issues are expected at higher mileages, and that low mileage vehicles may suffer from dry components due to infrequent use. @LuckyLV questioned the validity of a brake receipt, hinting at confusion regarding service records. The interaction also included doubts about part availability for the model, which can cause potential issues for future maintenance needs.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @umemmerz appreciates the vehicle's beauty, specifically noting the desirable sunroof, although he expresses some dislike for the design of the new demon lacking widebody fenders. @BentleyIndy (The Seller) also expresses optimism for the auction and encourages potential buyers to contact them with questions. Overall, the general consensus seems to highlight the visual appeal of the car, even amidst some concerns.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's condition and specifications are varied but factual. Multiple users, including @CarlContino and @newcarpro, discussed details about the vehicle's features and potential issues like the black hood being aftermarket. The discussion also notes that there are no Demon Crate components included with the vehicle, as confirmed by @BentleyIndy (The Seller).
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition are prevalent, particularly focused on rust in certain areas. @parshooter and others have pointed out dirty and rusty sections of the underside, raising eyebrows about potential storage issues and past exposure to road salt. @Jronny expresses regret over not paying closer attention to these comments before placing a bid, indicating discontent that a low-mileage car would have rust, echoing sentiments from @DonaldDuck80 who feels that the absence of the crate diminishes value. The dialogue surrounding these concerns suggests potential reservations about the car's unseen issues.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its unique aesthetic and driving experience. @classicwannabe noted the appealing "white on white" color scheme and was interested in the feasibility of reinstalling the rear seats, which @Blyguy confirmed, stating that the mounts are still intact. @PDXBryan conveyed excitement about the car's potential performance, commenting on the reliability and torque of the 3.2 engine. @luft_dino described the car as beautiful, and @6footphoto validated the driving experience, calling it an absolute blast. @joseph_battista enthusiastically expressed his love for the car, while @Tripledigit simply stated he loved everything about it, indicating a strong positive sentiment around the vehicle.
Neutral: @Blyguy, the seller, provided detailed information about the car's condition and specifications. He explained that the car weighs around 2551 lbs and is close in weight to a Clubsport version. He also addressed questions about the car's mechanical and electrical systems, acknowledging that while most core functions are solid, some peripheral electrical issues existed but have been addressed in part. Further, he noted the car's registration details and its inability to pass a California smog test, which may be a consideration for potential buyers. @dtamscott appreciated the transparency in discussing repairs and the car's modifications but sought more clarity on certain historical aspects of the conversion.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the car's electrical systems and smog compliance. @dtamscott noted that while the core performance elements were solid, the issues mentioned in the recent repair order appeared to be mainly electrical, raising questions about reliability. Additionally, @SactoKeith inquired about smog compliance, to which @Blyguy confirmed that the car would not pass a smog test in California. @Fatman12 pointed out the implications of future legislative changes regarding emissions testing, while @Tirefriar highlighted the limitations imposed by classic car insurance and California historic plates, indicating potential drawbacks for those looking to use the vehicle regularly.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments express admiration for the vehicle, particularly its performance capabilities. @topduarte mentions his own impressive vehicles and emphasizes the underrated torque of the L98 and LT1 engines. @Bmarcum appreciates NR auctions and believes this car looks like a fantastic opportunity for the next owner, noting that a 6-speed C4 is always a good investment. Moreover, @C4geek and @rgilson7 provide complementary remarks about the LT1 engine's low-end torque and overall performance when compared to other engine models, highlighting their fondness for the driving experience.
Neutral: The comments include discussions about the car's specifications and necessary repairs. @gwsellers asks about the non-functioning passenger seat adjustment and the missing stereo receiver, indicating some confusion about the vehicle's condition. The seller, @JeffreyTSloan, clarifies these points, mentioning that the passenger seat motor is operational but the seat does not move. Additionally, he shares that he removed the radio, which had stopped working. Meanwhile, other users, such as @slammin, point out that non-moving seats and radio issues are common problems with C4s, suggesting aftermarket solutions that are available to fix them.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the vehicle's condition. @98WS6 highlights a gap in the hood and bumper, implying a potential alignment issue, while @MHunt33 questions the startup reliability, suggesting that the cold start video appears misleading. @bobr85 and @auto_engineer request recent maintenance records, showing skepticism regarding the car's service history, and @marlin4570 inquires about the functionality of the A/C and CD player, hinting at uncertainties regarding the vehicle’s operational status. These comments reflect a cautious approach from potential buyers assessing the vehicle's overall reliability.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The 1973 Porsche 914 2.0 is receiving acclaim for its condition and modifications. @BobbySmith noted its classification as a 914S and expressed enthusiasm for expert opinions, suggesting it as a stellar example. @CardiffClassics (The Seller) highlighted its pristine service records since 1973 and encouraged potential buyers to schedule a visit. Commenters like @revron and @Buyingformywife praised its rarity and overall appeal, while @JOE486 appreciated its features, signaling a strong interest in the vehicle among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several users discussed the vehicle's specifications among themselves. @E55 clarified that the center console and fog lamps were part of the 'Appearance Group' option. @mbr993 raised questions about the speedometer replacement, noting its inaccuracy and that it was not from 1973, while @CardiffClassics (The Seller) explained the vehicle's history related to its sale in Canada. There were also discussions regarding shipping costs, with @MCShack sharing quotes for shipping options. This indicates a general curiosity about the car's background and logistics.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters expressed concerns about specific aspects of the vehicle. @Auction4me requested a CARFAX due to uncertainty regarding the actual mileage, which others echoed. @JOE486 mentioned dissatisfaction with the radio antenna's placement. Additionally, the shipping costs were a point of contention, with @MCShack noting among the highest rates seen and @Buyingformywife suggesting that auction sites may need to find better shipping partners. Overall, while there is significant interest, apprehensions about certain details reflect a critical view.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its outstanding presentation and appealing features. @ajan3 complimented the seller for a well-presented Boxster, while @usd97 noted the vehicle’s impressive low mileage of 25k, suggesting potential owners take advantage of its performance. The enthusiasm from @enthusiastic_enthusiast (The Seller) resonated with many, as they expressed excitement about the car and encouraged bidders to connect if they had questions. Also, @2002rick praised the car's condition and uniqueness, distinguishing it as a standout among Porsches at an event, emphasizing that the Boxster retains the last generation of the flat six engine.
Neutral: Several comments indicate an interest in the car and its features without expressing strong opinions either way. @oldreliable provided insights into the car's history, detailing the ownership transitions and noting the extensive maintenance records available. The dialogue about the vehicle's specifications, such as the DME report, further assured prospective buyers of its condition. Additionally, @zipster21 and @montauk18 requested further clarifications on certain features, such as the rear spoiler and specific spots on the doors, to which the seller responded with helpful updates, demonstrating transparency in the auction process.
Negative: Concerns arose regarding some aspects of the car, particularly around the PCM resetting issue and a couple of specific marks noticed in photos. @zipster21 and others raised questions about the black spots in certain images, which @oldreliable indicated may just be due to camera faults, while @enthusiastic_enthusiast (The Seller) confirmed the doors are free from such issues. Additionally, questions about service history were posed by @manofcars2000, against which @oldreliable reported no service since 2023, noting the car was lightly used, raising some unease about the oil change schedule. Overall, while most comments displayed interest or support, concerns about specific vehicle conditions and maintenance created a degree of skepticism among some potential buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @2002WS6 expressed nostalgia for the 2002 model year of this vehicle, appreciating its analog gauges over a digital dashboard. @johnnyvett shared similar sentiments, highlighting the unique features of this one-year model run, noting the wider fenders and standard rear spoiler. @zdoctor complemented the overall design, comparing it to other classic cars of the 1980s, and praised the car's color. @captjoekc recalled fond memories of his wife's car, indicating a strong emotional attachment. @TheZ31Hunter noted the car's pristine condition, emphasizing the exceptional upkeep that prevented common issues found in other models.
Neutral: @gts, the seller, provided a detailed account of the car's history and maintenance, emphasizing its status as a true survivor and highlighting all repairs done with OEM parts. The seller mentioned that the vehicle had been garaged and only driven on sunny days, which contributed to its well-preserved state. They assured potential buyers of the car's integrity, noting that it has never been involved in an accident and retains its original components in good condition. Documentation, including the owner's manual and service records, will be provided to assure the next caretaker of its maintenance history.
Negative: Some comments hinted at the car's age and potential issues. @gts (The Seller) acknowledged that while the car is in excellent condition, the original headliner is falling, indicating some wear and tear on original components. @gts also noted that the cassette stereo doesn’t work, which could be a drawback for some buyers. Overall, while the vehicle has many admirers and a well-documented history, there are minor concerns regarding the original parts that may deter some potential buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MRC63 highlighted the vehicle's impeccable condition, stating that everything is intact and well taken care of, including the leather interiors and front end which has protective film. They performed recent maintenance, such as an oil change, ensuring the new buyer is set to enjoy the car immediately. @elihbrown praised the condition further, suggesting it could easily pass off as having lower mileage due to its admirable upkeep. Many commenters, including @kickintires1 and @ASimon, expressed their confidence in the car's features like the carbon ceramic brakes, citing their effectiveness and low maintenance over time, underscoring the vehicle's value.
Neutral: There were inquiries regarding the vehicle's history and features, with @Bavaria911 asking if the Cayenne had been used for towing and requesting pictures of the tow hitch. @Spoolenturbo raised a question about whether the transfer case had been used often and if there were oil leaks from the turbos. @KaiM sought confirmation from the seller regarding the functionality of the exterior door handle buttons and any noises when turning, showing that potential buyers are focused on understanding the vehicle's practicality and performance.
Negative: Some potential concerns arose regarding the vehicle's past maintenance and any possible issues, with @nick778 specifically inquiring about oil leaks from the turbos and other components, to which @MRC63 replied that there are no leaks and the vehicle has been thoroughly inspected. @kickintires1 appeared hesitant about the carbon ceramic brakes, indicating some buyer apprehension about this specific feature. The absence of service records aside from what’s shown on Carfax was a point that caused a bit of uncertainty among the bidders, with commenters looking for more transparency regarding the vehicle's complete history.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dundertaker expresses fond nostalgia for the vehicle, recalling it as their first car and complimenting its current condition. @magra praises the originality and apparent great shape of the auction car, noting similarities with their own vehicle and highlighting enjoyable aspects such as build quality and practicality. @PontiacNut shares a sentimental memory about their father's love for the squareback, suggesting that its uniqueness makes it special.
Neutral: @Goldie1980 (The Seller) explains that they acquired the car from a reputable Volkswagen restoration company in 2019, which fully rebuilt it. They mention that it hasn't been used as a daily driver, thus only accumulating about 200 miles since. When questioned about specific features, @Goldie1980 provides information about the air conditioning system as well as clarity regarding the car's restoration process and condition, albeit with limited technical knowledge.
Negative: Several comments express concerns about the vehicle's air conditioning, with @Farfman and @Nld1966 inquiring about the functionality and compressor. @broodie questions why the vehicle has only seen limited mileage since its purchase, suggesting possible neglect. There is uncertainty about the car's components, such as the loss of the factory Bosch fuel-injection system, which was common among these vehicles, as indicated by @moonbeam996GT3 who raises multiple concerns about the car's functionality and original features.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle for its overall appearance and performance. @98SNAKEEATER noted the vehicle has a 'Magic Dial' and described it as a clean rig. @Espanolie described it as a great looking 80 series with all three lockers functioning, suggesting it is well-equipped for off-road adventures. @PKBAYRIDGE expressed a desire to own the vehicle again, mentioning it has held up well under its current ownership, indicating a positive impression of its durability.
Neutral: The comments indicate that the vehicle has undergone modifications, such as the installation of a Prinsu rack, and @JPW101 provided insights about the maintenance work done on the roof. They reassured potential buyers that the modifications were performed correctly, with any original rack holes sealed to prevent rust or leaks. Service records were also referenced, further adding to the vehicle's history and care.
Negative: However, some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's air conditioning, with @JPW101 mentioning that the coldness of the air conditioning is weak and may require a recharge. @PKBAYRIDGE also pointed out the presence of rust on the catalytic converters within just a few years, which might be a concern for potential buyers regarding the vehicle's long-term care.
|
2002 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am WS6 Collector Edition Coupe 6-Speed
2G2FV22G622132638
Lot 197965
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a sense of enthusiasm and assurance regarding the vehicle's quality and functionality. @AKSOLDIT, the seller, is actively engaging with potential buyers by providing clear and prompt answers to inquiries. For instance, @Bradensells asked if the air conditioning blows cold, and @AKSOLDIT confirmed it does, which likely reassures interested buyers about the vehicle's working condition. Furthermore, @AKSOLDIT also confirmed the vehicle's eligibility for importing with the necessary documentation, indicating a professional approach to handling the sale.
Neutral: There is a mix of factual clarifications and inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and compliance for importation. @MidCitiesMildMan brought up a potential issue regarding the vehicle's manufacturing location, noting that the VIN starts with '2' suggests it may have been built in Canada. @AKSOLDIT acknowledged this point and provided reassurance by stating they could obtain the required compliance documentation. Other inquiries focused on details like the presence of a valid Ontario safety certification and the vehicle's operational components, showcasing the buyers' desire for thorough information.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the nuances of the vehicle's importation process. @MidCitiesMildMan mentioned a previous experience where their own vehicle was delayed in obtaining compliance documentation, hinting at potential complications for future buyers. Additionally, there seems to be a slight inconsistency regarding the vehicle's manufacturing details, which could lead to confusion or hesitation among buyers unfamiliar with the import process. Overall, while the comments suggest interest, they also highlight areas where potential buyers might experience uncertainty.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting its appealing features and overall desirability. @335togo admires the car and wishes for more garage space to keep it, while @TooTall points out the rare fold-down rear seats as a significant advantage. @JohnAsh appreciates the unique "Magma" interior, and @Zemaitis praises the good color combination and clean history. @mikey3_6, the seller, provides reassurance about the car's maintenance and care from previous owners, confirming that it has been well maintained in a favorable climate.
Neutral: Several comments request additional information regarding the vehicle's features and condition. @RAV4X4 inquires about the rarity of the rear seat feature mentioned by @TooTall, and @tantalic asks about seat belt availability. Other commenters seek clarity on the car's history and paint job, with @Ericml and @ExclusiveStudioGarage specifically asking if the paint was done at a reputable shop. The seller responds with detailed explanations about these inquiries, indicating he has some limitations in knowledge regarding the paint's specifications.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the condition of the vehicle and potential issues. @beg1 points out a possible oil leak evidenced in a specific picture and questions the seller's decision to sell the car after just six months. @Icemachiner questions the quality of previous bodywork, specifically mentioning a tape line that suggests poor prep work. Additionally, the seller acknowledges a past oil leak but assures that there have been no ongoing issues since purchase, trying to alleviate worries from potential buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Pikal commented on the vehicle's appearance, highlighting the 'very nice wood.' @SlowNRusty praised the design updates from the S1 to the S2, describing them as subtle yet classy. @bradyzq approved of the vehicle's potentially modified features, such as a lower stance with a front spoiler and additional driving lights, indicating a favorable view of these enhancements.
Neutral: @johnjm raised a question about the year classification of the Silver Shadow II, mentioning that the production stopped in June 1980 but questioning if it can be considered an '81 based on its delivery date. @JBAdams provided clarity, explaining the vehicle's normal features in relation to different markets, and discussed tax and insurance implications of the manufacturing and registration dates. @Jimmyghause shared insights about the car's history in Europe, mentioning its prior registry in France and Monaco while acknowledging the lack of service records in recent decades which added a layer of mystery to its history.
Negative: @JJI356 expressed skepticism regarding the classification of the vehicle as a 1981 model, stating that they had heard production stopped in 1980, though still noting the car's overall appeal. @Dbenjamin64's comment focused on elegance without delving into concerns, but @gbt3201 inquired about the functionality of the A/C, suggesting potential apprehension regarding the vehicle's condition.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the '69 Camaro's overall aesthetic and mechanical condition. @335togo describes it as having a "clean look," while @Super-Dave calls it a "time-capsule," indicating its excellent preservation. @boaboyoz commends it as a "wicked white Camaro" and a "tasty build," which enhances its desirability among collectors. The seller, @FirehouseVintage, notes that the car has undergone a frame-off restoration and has minimal imperfections on the exterior, leading to a positive consensus about its quality in the community.
Neutral: Several comments provide informative insights into the Camaro's historical context and potential classifications. @PonyCarTim mentions that this Camaro could be one of the last manufactured before the model shift to the new body style. There is discussion about the car's trim tag and whether it is a true Super Sport or a clone, with @Woodland66 and @BubbaGPZ1100 offering perspectives on the X55 designation and SS badging. The seller also engages with commenters regarding specifics about the car's interior, A/C functionality, and paint quality, reflecting a willingness to clarify details for potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the positive reception, some concerns have been raised about specific features of the vehicle. @ssterry humorously comments on the incorrect labeling of the hubcaps, noting it reflects the country of origin and implying minor flaws in authenticity. Commenters like @GSD_Guy express confusion about the original versus replaced interior, which adds a layer of skepticism regarding the car's restoration history. @deshelto inquires about potential undercarriage leaks, suggesting that while the car is well-regarded, some uncertainties remain about its overall condition.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed a favorable impression of the vehicle, emphasizing its uniqueness and condition. @CRUSH highlighted the classic appeal of the manual transmission, stating, "Save the manuals" as admiration for the three pedals. @Ottovalvolina praised the vehicle's specifications, color, and overall presentation, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. The seller, @Bugulup, appreciated the compliments from both @CRUSH and @Ottovalvolina, reinforcing the attention to detail in the listing.
Neutral: Several comments sought specific information about the vehicle, demonstrating an engaged interest. @Davam inquired about viewing locations, while @KMB123 posed a question regarding the brush guard, prompting a detailed response from @Mudman3110. The seller, @Bugulup, addressed these queries thoroughly, including verifying that the ARB bumper lights work and discussing the vehicle's fantastic V6 engine. Additionally, @Zducks asked about the shifting mechanics, receiving confirmation of smooth engagement from the seller.
Negative: On the downside, some comments reflected concerns regarding the vehicle, particularly around the brush guard, with @KMB123 questioning its mounting and @Wildboar expressing dislike for it. There was also a notable absence of the factory bumper, which @TA22Husker noted in the comments. Although the seller, @Bugulup, responded to questions about the cabin smell and the engagement of gears, there were underlying worries among potential buyers about specific features and their impacts on the vehicle's appeal.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CarsGlobal (The Seller) has been proactive in responding to inquiries, indicating a willingness to engage with potential buyers. They promised to provide cold start and test-drive videos soon, which shows their commitment to transparency regarding the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @CarsGlobal mentioned they would ensure the car is on a lift to examine the undercarriage before the auction ends, addressing concerns about rust and the car's overall integrity.
Neutral: Several commenters are seeking additional information or clarification about the vehicle. @GSN inquired about the air conditioning, while @Frick raised questions regarding the original paint and potential rust issues. @Farmer42 expressed interest in a Monday or Tuesday viewing, demonstrating local interest but not providing a definitive commitment to purchase. @Jkitchin's assumption about the model's specifications highlights interest in the vehicle's history without making judgments on its current state.
Negative: @Frick expressed frustration about a lack of answers to their questions and photos, indicating dissatisfaction with the information provided. @SwissMovement commented on the seemingly chaotic bidding process, suggesting a feeling of frustration among bidders. Additionally, @mototwin1's repeated requests for videos and answers might reflect impatience with the seller's communication pace.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commentators expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its appealing design and low mileage. @GDogg noted it as an 'Awesome Eldo Convertible in Autumn Maple Firemist' and called it a 'show stopper.' @addictedtojunk and @JaDawgPNW also praised the car's condition and luxurious features like the red leather button tuck seats. Additionally, @CMRCollection mentioned the beauty and ride comfort of similar models, suggesting that this Eldorado is hard to find in such pristine condition. @LowMileageClassics (The Seller) remains responsive to inquiries, promising videos to showcase the vehicle further and thanking commenters for their interest.
Neutral: Some comments focused on details regarding the car, including inquiries about its operational status and mileage authenticity. @Jguido asked for confirmation on the mileage and functionality, to which @LowMileageClassics (The Seller) affirmed that it is indeed a true 5,000-mile car. Discussions also arose around the car’s color with @frankhammer expressing skepticism about the Autumn Maple designation, while others defended it, such as @1965eldo, who asserted that the car's original paint accurately represents its color. There was also a general curiosity about the original tires and their condition, suggesting that they could be included for show while cautioning against using them for driving.
Negative: There were some doubts raised regarding the vehicle's color and discrepancies in its features. @frankhammer and @TennCarGuy questioned the accuracy of the Autumn Maple Firemist designation, arguing over its appearance in different models. Additionally, @rodartea raised various concerns regarding the car's mechanical elements, such as fluid leaks and the condition of the weatherstripping, which could imply a need for further maintenance. Such skepticism has emerged amidst overall positive sentiments, indicating a mix of enthusiasm and caution among potential buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors show a strong appreciation for the vehicle's condition and features. @60Sevillian notes that significant work has already been done, which adds value to the car. @TolucaLake highlights the aesthetics by expressing fondness for the color and inquires about the power equipment functioning properly, indicating interest in the vehicle's overall performance. @EdmontonCarGuy sees the car as a perfect retirement vehicle and is open to overcoming concerns from past accidents, demonstrating a positive outlook on ownership. @JarrodG72 shares personal experience with similar models, confirming their durability and reliability, while also admiring the color and the fact that major issues have been resolved.
Neutral: Several commentors seek clarity and details regarding the vehicle's history and functionality. @Mike1486 predicts discussions will revolve around the wiring harness, suggesting common concerns among potential buyers. @TolucaLake asks about the function of various power equipment components, indicating a standard checklist for interested buyers but without expressing dissatisfaction. Questions about past accidents arise, such as from @cjhooper, who requests more information, hinting at careful consideration but not outright negativity about the vehicle's past.
Negative: Some commentors voiced concerns about specific issues and the presentation of the vehicle. @Captdavid criticizes the context of showing a road test for a diesel four-door car, suggesting that it is not appropriate for the listing, hinting at a negative perception of the listing's presentation. Additionally, @cjhooper's inquiry about the nature of the past accident and needed repairs reveals underlying apprehension regarding the vehicle's integrity and safety. Furthermore, @67bonnie (The Seller) acknowledges the lack of detailed service records from the original owner, which may raise doubts about the vehicle's overall maintenance history among buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @SolarSrt (The Seller) provided additional photos and a walk-around video, enhancing the viewing experience for potential buyers. @texastruckwatcher praised the quality of the pictures, indicating that the visuals are appealing and effective in showcasing the vehicle.
Neutral: @MacheteMan and @kenw66 clarified the engine specifications, noting that it is a 460 cubic inch (7.5 liter) rather than the previously mentioned 351 (5.8 liter). This correction adds to the accuracy of the vehicle's representation, which @bringatrailer acknowledged by updating the engine description accordingly.
Negative:
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @jpunch reflects on nostalgic memories of traveling in similar wagons during childhood, bringing a sense of warmth to the comments. @robiefarmer and @dougmael praise the vehicle's tough appearance, while @MAmft and @jbh30319 highlight its sleeper and auction potential, calling it an excellent example for events like 'Sick Week'. @JayKay2430 and @Pace_Adorno appreciate the modern yet fitting Dakota Digital gauges and the impressive sounds and visuals of the wagon, respectively.
Neutral: @Jsho1620 (The Seller) addresses inquiries about fuel mileage and the original engine, noting it was a stock 350. He also engages with @mac44 about potentially providing driving videos and acknowledges the compliments received, sharing his dedication to the car over three years. @Detroitiron offers a practical request for the spare tire cover, indicating an interest in the details of the vehicle.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism or confusion about specific vehicle modifications. @BSer questions the term "revised camshaft," expressing uncertainty over automotive terminology that may not be familiar to all. Additionally, @UsernameX wistfully recalls when these wagons were abundant and affordable, now lamenting their rarity and sentimental value for demolition derby memories, hinting at a decline in their availability.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm about the vehicle, noting its appealing appearance and characteristics. @944racer mentions the appealing engine modifications from reputable suppliers, describing the car as muy tempting and suggesting it might be interesting to dyno to see the power increase. @bamaNator appreciates the aesthetics, asserting that removing the N/A front bumper significantly enhances the car's look. @DrewsRight adds that the car seems very nice and mentions positive experiences with their own similar vehicle, reinforcing the impression that this car is likely in good condition and capable of handling well.
Neutral: Several commenters ask questions and seek clarification about various details of the vehicle. @Spokayman inquires about the vehicle's option code and speedometer issues, expressing curiosity about the seating and potential discrepancies caused by transmission or tires. @Longforlineup raises multiple questions, including those about the original dashboard and battery issues. The seller, @rberninzoni, consistently provides thoughtful responses, assuring potential buyers that the alternator and battery are functioning properly and that the dashboard is original, which addresses some concerns about its condition.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the car's temperature mechanics and potential aftermarket modifications. @trharlan cautions that the temperature readings while idling may suggest underlying issues, recommending the seller clarify what 'running warm' entails. @Rob-o1167 remarks on the likelihood that the front fascia is an aftermarket piece rather than an original Turbo/S2 part, which raises doubts about authenticity. Additionally, @bamaNator recalls past experiences with similar cars and expresses skepticism about the vehicle's performance based on idle temperature readings, highlighting a potential issue in overheating.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ClassicLover2 shared that the vehicle's paint is original blue, with black accents recently repainted, ensuring that it retains much of its original character. Additional detailed pictures requested by @max_speed and others were provided, enhancing buyer confidence in the vehicle's condition. Comments highlight a commitment to transparency, with @ClassicLover2 affirming the vehicle's authenticity, including the air intake installation by Land Rover, which addresses concerns raised by @2hecknback.
Neutral: @2hecknback initiated a discussion about the engine air intake, while @max_speed inquired about the specifics of the paint job and requested detailed images of the vehicle's bulkhead and wheel arches. @bringatrailer noted the inclusion of 14 more photos in the gallery as an enhancement to the listing. Conversations reveal a mix of curiosity about the vehicle's specifics and a desire for thorough documentation.
Negative: @julianelizondo raised concerns regarding the lack of recent service information and the overall mechanical state of the vehicle, including potential rust or issues with the motor and transmission. This indicates a gap that could affect buyer confidence. Although @ClassicLover2 attempted to address these concerns by stating that the last service was in October 2024 and confirming the absence of rust or damage, the initial worry reflects some skepticism in the community.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Donaldduck (The Seller) shared that the bike has been stored in a climate-controlled environment, and he has been starting it every six months. He assured that the motorcycle works fine and has been ridden recently, which seems to allay concerns about its low mileage. @39mercman complemented the bike, agreeing with @Jaymac824 that letting a vehicle sit unused can lead to problems, but acknowledged the bike's overall quality.
Neutral: @Jaymac824 raised a valid point about the potential issues that can arise from a low mileage motorcycle that has not been mechanically reviewed in a while, specifically regarding seals, gaskets, and fuel systems. @Love4x4 inquired about the bike's history and the dates on the tires, reflecting an interest in understanding more about the motorcycle's background. @Wantemallnow questioned whether the bike had been ridden, looking for assurance on its condition.
Negative: While there were no outright negative comments, @msteiner expressed concern over the startup video, asking if the bike can stay running and idle properly. This indicates a level of skepticism about its performance despite @Donaldduck's assurances. Overall, the comments suggest some cautious optimism about the bike's condition, balanced with a desire for more detailed information.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the Lotus Evora 400 for its performance and overall driving experience. @midenginer expressed love for the car, describing it as special and reliable. @Cross-hatch noted its wonderful performance and appearance after personally viewing and driving the car. @Carsnme shared similar sentiments, stating that the Evora offers a visceral driving feel and is an outstanding road trip car, highlighting its comfort and superior handling compared to competitors. Additionally, @GoIrish89 noted it is a great car for taller drivers, echoing positive feelings about the car's specifications.
Neutral: Comments frequently sought clarification about various aspects of the vehicle. @phaheem inquired about pictures of the rear seats, while @M0USECOP asked whether the car has experienced limp mode issues, which could be a concern for potential buyers. @BMVeyie raised questions regarding California smog regulations and the vehicle's compliance, to which @Anglopom confirmed the original exhaust parts are included and necessary for registration. The seller, @Anglopom, provided detailed information about maintenance records, the performance of the car, and various vehicle features, showcasing adequate communication with potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were expressed regarding potential issues and vehicle condition. @montegofd3s pointed out a picture depicting a loose bolt, suggesting it may need attention, while @Bryon raised concerns about possible pet hair in the vehicle, worrying about allergies. @Harordr questioned the condition of the car's plastic panel on the rear seat, seeking assurance about its functionality. Overall, while the positives were plentiful, a few commenters brought up issues that may require further scrutiny before a purchase.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the truck's design, calling it incredibly cool and a stupendous custom creation. @boaboyoz praised the truck, describing it as a build that is extremely cool, while @rickaz referred to it as 'imagineering at its finest', highlighting the fun aspect. @tlcamg also joined in the enthusiasm, stating it was now stuck in their mind and shared it with a COE fanatic brother, showcasing excitement about the unique build.
Neutral: Some discussions surrounded the technical aspects of the truck, with @gregducato correcting a transmission type discrepancy. @bkbw inquired about the truck's capability for long drives, to which the seller, @maxgrundydesign, confirmed it was capable of a west coast trip. Others, including @wngd, expressed curiosity about the truck's intended usage, questioning if it would be used for car shows, advertising, or for personal driving.
Negative: A few comments reflected concerns about the truck's title and categorization, with @bullitt65 pointing out an issue regarding the vehicle's original identification. @39mercman wished for a different style of auction video, expressing a preference for a run and drive video instead of a musical montage. Overall, while critiques were constructive, some commenters suggested that more transparency and clarity in showcasing the truck's capabilities would enhance the presentation.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dreamkid21 described the vehicle as beautiful, indicating a positive impression of its aesthetic appeal. @stathios (The Seller) presented the vehicle enthusiastically, highlighting its status and inviting potential buyers to take a closer look through detailed photos and video. He noted that the brakes feel good and mentioned that the 4Runner drives as expected for its age, which provides reassurance to interested buyers regarding its functionality.
Neutral: @Chamba pointed out an interesting feature of the vehicle, mentioning the combination of DX seats and SR5 trim, suggesting it may have been ordered specifically in this way. @JoRoInMD asked a series of questions regarding the overall condition, including inquiries about the operational status of various components, suggesting a neutral stance where he is seeking more information before forming a more definitive opinion. @western1997 expected additional features like rear seat heater controls, which indicates a possible discrepancy between expectations and what is offered.
Negative: @b1LL_ expressed concern about the rusted bumper in relation to the undercarriage's cleanliness, raising questions about potential underlying issues. @brettniles85 highlighted concerns regarding the undercoating used on the vehicle, categorizing it as less than ideal, and suggested inspecting specific areas for rust out of caution. Additionally, he mentioned that the rear bumper needs repair and pointed out potential rust issues that require attention, which reflects a negative perception of the vehicle's condition.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, particularly its eye-catching color combination. @eatmex emphasizes the great color scheme, while @FullBlownChaosFL (The Seller) highlights the car's limited production options, noting that it is a highly optioned C8 in Hypersonic Gray with unique interior details. Additionally, @ScottyCrypto humorously likens the car's appeal to a Tom Petty song, suggesting a strong emotional connection to the vehicle.
Neutral: Information shared by @FullBlownChaosFL (The Seller) indicates that the vehicle is still under factory warranty, expiring soon, and that the seller is available to answer questions throughout the auction period. The seller mentions the possibility of extending the warranty through local dealers, demonstrating an openness to assisting potential buyers. Several commenters, such as @autiosDinero, inquire about additional items included with the vehicle, such as manuals and keys, to which the seller responds promptly with details.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and consistency arise from several commentators. @Autogeek113 points out mismatched tires, questioning the vehicle's maintenance history, and asks about the absence of specific features like the Magnetic Selective Ride Control. Additionally, @69L89 and @Brow1974 inquire about missing elements like the red engine cover and fender hash stripe mentioned in the window sticker, leaving potential buyers wondering about the car's original specifications. @FullBlownChaosFL's responses indicate that these features may have been overlooked during installation or lost, which raises concerns about the vehicle's overall integrity.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its pristine condition and beautiful presentation. @Wheelyneat was 'totally gobsmacked', while @ThreePalmsFun called it 'just wow!' and mentioned having owned eight similar vehicles. @KentuckyEd noted its exceptional appearance, declaring it 'looks better than new', and @Rhodester reminisced fondly about their first car experience, describing the current model as 'absolutely gorgeous'. Additionally, @ekstorey commended its underside, stating one could 'eat off' of it, showcasing a deep appreciation for the car's restoration and upkeep.
Neutral: Some comments brought attention to specific aspects of the car and its listing. @Sdanen4 queried the classification of the vehicle, pointing out the description referred to it as a GT when it is clearly a Roadster. @Tom_S. shared their experience seeing the car in person during a car meet, praising its overall aesthetics, while @mgeezer noted a discrepancy concerning the vehicle's tachometer displayed in the test video. Furthermore, @Cendrick inquired about a possible rattle observed during a driving video, indicating some uncertainty about the car's performance.
Negative: A few commenters voiced concerns regarding the vehicle. @Mgrescueguy noted that the fan was on backward, indicating a possible oversight in the restoration. @Sdanen4 also pointed out that the front side light-turn signals were mounted incorrectly, which could detract from the car's aesthetic. Additionally, @Cendrick questioned a potential noise during driving, furthering the concerns about the vehicle's functionality. Overall, while many were enamored with the car's beauty and story, these critiques showed that some details needed attention.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Yamadude68 shared a positive sentiment about the vehicle, expressing enthusiasm by saying, "I had one" and adding a smiley face, which suggests fond memories or a pleasurable experience with the vehicle. The mention of the OEM Gopher sticker being worth $500 highlights the sticker's value and adds a unique appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic or historical charm.
Neutral: @Yamadude68 noted a lack of comments in the first 6.5 days, indicating a possible slow response from the community. This observation points to a quiet interest or limited engagement surrounding the vehicle, implying that potential buyers or enthusiasts may be taking their time to consider it.
Negative:
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Tracker1969 (The Seller) has been proactive in providing detailed information about the vehicle, including its delivery date and specifications. He has taken the initiative to offer additional photos upon request and is willing to post a video demonstrating the operation of the roof. Furthermore, he clarified that the vehicle had its maintenance records available, showing transparency regarding its history.
Neutral: @earlebird raised several technical questions about the vehicle's door handles and possible oil leaks, displaying a thorough concern for the condition of the SSR. He mentioned previous experience with similar vehicles, expressing interest in understanding past issues like the reported broken door handle. He also sought clarifications on undercarriage photos, showing an interest in the vehicle's maintenance and repair history.
Negative: Concerns were raised about potential repairs and the condition of the vehicle by different commenters. @Chipper55 noted signs of a possible repair with visible burn marks and cracks in a weld, which could affect structural integrity. @earlebird's inquiries about oil leaks further highlighted apprehensions regarding the SSR’s condition, with suggestions to have flaws checked out due to the oil pan's minor seepage.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @EpicMC (The Seller) makes a compelling case for the Subaru Baja, emphasizing that it runs and drives flawlessly. He mentions that all components, including the air conditioning and radio, are operational, and stresses the importance of thorough inspections conducted by himself and his mechanics. Bidders can feel confident in the quality of the vehicle, and @EpicMC assures that buyers will not be disappointed with their purchase.
Neutral: @option58 brings up a practical question regarding the functionality of the bed extender, highlighting a past experience with a glitchy one. @MattyZ inquires about the maintenance history of the vehicle, specifically whether the head gasket has been inspected or replaced since its last sale, indicating a cautious approach towards potential repairs. @gwmills2016 shares their unfamiliarity with the Subaru Baja and seeks clarification on a sound detected during a drive video, pointing to a desire for more detailed information before bidding.
Negative: @K9Leader raises concerns about potential rust issues, specifically requesting pics of the rear doorsill dog legs, a common rust point in older Baja models. The comment suggests past negative experiences have influenced their caution about replacing their previously owned vehicle. While @EpicMC defends the car's condition by stating there is no rust anywhere, it reflects a tension between seller confidence and buyer skepticism regarding potential hidden issues.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dts1785 expressed enthusiasm about the 2018 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon, describing it as an 'awesome family toy' that has provided fun experiences for all. The vehicle's capability and versatility allow for exciting adventures, making it appealing for families looking for a vehicle that can handle both daily driving and outdoor excursions. The seller shared cool photos and videos of the Jeep in action, highlighting its potential for adventure and enjoyment.
Neutral: The vehicle comes equipped with a wide range of standard and optional features, including advanced safety technologies, performance enhancements, and comfort items. This includes a powerful 3.6L V6 engine, an 8-speed automatic transmission, a spacious interior with multiple seating configurations, and modern tech features such as Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. These specifications suggest that the Jeep is designed to appeal to a diverse audience seeking both utility and comfort.
Negative: Though specific negative comments were not provided, there may be potential concerns regarding the maintenance and fuel efficiency of such an off-road capable vehicle, as well as the practicality of a Jeep for everyday family use. Additionally, some Jeep enthusiasts may critique the Wrangler for its ride quality and interior noise levels compared to more luxury-oriented SUVs. However, these points have not been explicitly raised in the comments.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @McPenguin expresses fondness for the vehicle, recalling ownership of a similar model and expressing a sense of nostalgia and appreciation. @VDPXJSC praises the durability of the 95-97 XJs, sharing their experience of owning one for over 20 years and noting its exceptional condition even at high mileage. They also emphasize that the car is not only beautiful but also worth the effort to maintain, indicating pride in ownership.
Neutral: @benbill (The Seller) mentions that they have owned the car for about two years, during which they have performed minimal repairs, including an oil change, A/C maintenance, rear struts replacement, a new battery, and speaker upgrades. They also highlight that the vehicle history is detailed in the Carfax report, implying transparency regarding its maintenance. Additionally, @benbill notes that the rear windows were tinted recently, ensuring the car's aesthetics are enhanced while also addressing an inquiry from @ScottZin about the headliner replacement and confirming its condition.
Negative: @nonametotell raises a valid concern regarding the vehicle's compliance with California DMV's smog regulations, which could be a potential issue for buyers in that area. This concern brings attention to the logistics of owning an older vehicle in an area with stringent emissions regulations. @ScottZin's inquiry about a mismatch in the headliner fabric indicates potential quality issues that could affect buyer confidence.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the 2008 Audi S5's styling, with @charliebird123 noting its beautiful colors and @1000songs reminiscing about the appeal of the V8 engine that turns heads as a grand tourer. @emVee highlights the driving engagement and comfortable qualities of both the V8 and supercharged V6 models, suggesting that the S5 remains undervalued and likely to become more desirable after its discontinuation.
Neutral: The seller, @Microshieldauto, provides essential details about the auction for the S5, including its location in Stoney Creek, Ontario, and mentions that it has low mileage with documentation to confirm its service history. They clarify to @bsyedk11 that the vehicle will be sold with Ontario registration and mention coordinating shipping for Canadian buyers while exempting U.S. buyers from sales tax. @Shahman78's inquiry into maintenance records and @RFJ1247's concern about the lack of service records over ten years are addressed by the seller.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns and ask questions that highlight potential issues. @bdox and @Jimvee2 question the apparent discrepancy between the vehicle's registration in Saskatchewan and its location in Ontario. @Shahman78 asks for detailed maintenance history, and @RFJ1247 raises a significant issue regarding the absence of service records over the last decade. Overall, these inquiries may reflect anxiety about the car's maintenance and history.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Knuckles-R-Busted expresses admiration for the vehicle, noting its excellent build quality and appealing appearance. This comment highlights a positive perception of the vehicle's design and craftsmanship. Additionally, @Malaka has a hopeful sentiment, believing that despite the current trends, the vehicle might make a comeback in popularity and potentially increase in value, showing optimism regarding the future of such builds.
Neutral: Comments from @jmeade1964 (The Seller) do not provide explicit evaluations of the vehicle, as they are solely attributed to the seller without any additional context or opinions shared. This leaves a neutral impression, suggesting that while the seller is present, the lack of content in the comments does not necessarily enhance or detract from the perception of the vehicle.
Negative: There are no overtly negative comments included in the feedback regarding the vehicle. The absence of any critical remarks or concerns about the vehicle might indicate that there are no significant drawbacks reported by viewers, although it could also suggest a lack of engagement in discussing potential faults or issues.
|
16k-Mile 2004 Ford Mustang GT Convertible 40th Anniversary 5-Speed
1FAFP45X54F239166
Lot 197991
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Trooptroop expressed enthusiasm by describing the vehicle as a 'sharp ride,' indicating a strong visual appeal. @ChicagoTom, who owns the same 2004 Mustang, praised its reliability and low maintenance needs, suggesting that this model year has resolved earlier issues. They also noted the vehicle's potential for value appreciation, associating it with the classic Fox Body Mustangs. Similarly, @jimjim appreciated the car's fun factor and emphasized the benefit of its one-owner history.
Neutral: @Stang33 (The Seller) provided thorough responses to potential buyer inquiries, confirming that the vehicle is in good condition with properly functioning brakes and air conditioning. They mentioned that the brakes had been replaced to ensure optimal performance and explained the reason behind frequent replacements, attributing it to the car sitting unused for extended periods. They also committed to posting video content to further assure interested buyers of the vehicle’s reliability.
Negative: @Boat_Man raised concerns about ongoing brake issues, pointing out that the vehicle had brake pads and rotors replaced twice despite having low mileage. They requested further information about the car’s overall condition, including the air conditioning, clutch, and transmission performance. This indicates a degree of skepticism concerning the vehicle's maintenance history and overall condition.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @campodf expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting it would be more desirable if it were a TDI, but still complimented its cleanliness, low mileage, and appealing colors. @Martin_480_Turbo regarded it as 'Peak Audi', suggesting a high level of appreciation for the model. @Carneed (The Seller) emphasized the meticulous care given to the vehicle, highlighting its impressive condition with only 28k miles and extensive equipment like the Premium Plus Package and Advanced Parking System, assuring potential buyers of its quality.
Neutral: @Carneed (The Seller) informed potential bidders about the auction and encouraged inquiries while mentioning that additional photos and videos would be uploaded. @classicguy57 questioned the availability of a driving video and asked about potential smoking odors inside the vehicle. @AZCanyon inquired about the presence of a trailer hitch and original window sticker, while @NOAOL111 and @Pasicale asked for more specific details on backup alerts, parking sensors, and a cold start video.
Negative: @Carneed (The Seller) had to clarify that the vehicle does not come with a trailer hitch or lane departure warning, indicating some limitations in the model's features. The absence of the original window sticker might be a concern for some buyers who value documentation. Overall, while some were seeking more detailed multimedia evidence of the car's condition, @Carneed consistently provided updates and responded to inquiries, showing a commitment to transparency.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @RMQ333 praised the vehicle as another fine ASC product, highlighting its design and color, mentioning that white is his favorite color. @Ycbmsma expressed appreciation for the prompt response of a site admin, indicating satisfaction with the communication and management of inquiries.
Neutral: @Bayranger inquired whether the replacement timing chain and water pump were new aftermarket parts, seeking documentation to verify the repairs. He also requested photos of the vehicle's console equipment to better understand its features. @nw_nick posed a question about the vehicle's reliability for a long road trip, reflecting a common concern among potential buyers looking for long-distance capability.
Negative: @motherscratcher pointed out a discrepancy between the description and the vehicle's photos, noting that the listing stated a glass window in the top while the images show a plastic window. Additionally, @Ycbmsma criticized irrelevant road tests being posted for a different vehicle, suggesting they provide no useful information for potential buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Beans_Bacon describes the vehicle as beautiful, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and overall allure.
Neutral: @Rymac has asked two questions regarding the vehicle, inquiring if the seller has the pre-lift suspension parts and if they could provide videos demonstrating acceleration and highway speeds. @Shaunryan82 also requests clarification regarding the functioning of the AC and is interested in a driving video.
Negative:
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle, a 2019 Corvette ZR1, has garnered enthusiastic comments from bidders and owners alike. @Cantech (The Seller) opened with a warm welcome, emphasizing their excitement about the auction. @Basil2000 echoed that sentiment, describing the car as 'the meanest 3-pedal corvette ever,' which resonates with potential buyers. @cmsgt72 also praised the vehicle's outstanding performance, stating it as the 'Best Corvette EVER built.' The strong engagement and encouraging words signify a deep appreciation for the quality and performance of this particular model.
Neutral: Various comments reflect curiosity and pride among current and prospective Corvette owners. @addicted2cars raised inquiries about the tires and any protective film, while @Cranel11 wondered how mileage affects their own ZR1's value. @foot1 offered a constructive suggestion regarding missing bolts on the front splitter, demonstrating a communal spirit among the Corvette enthusiast community. These dialogues, while not fervently enthusiastic, show an active interest in the car's specifics and overall experience.
Negative: However, there were concerns regarding the car's maintenance history with comments like @craZee lamenting about the vehicle's low mileage and two prior owners, hinting that it may not have been driven as intended. Additionally, @foot1's caution about the front splitter's integral bolts indicates potential oversight in past servicing, urging future owners to be vigilant. Such remarks reflect a mix of realization about the car's value and the importance of proper upkeep.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ajl1988 (The Seller) highlighted the vehicle as a running and driving example, offering reassurance to potential buyers about its condition. Commentors like @etip and @jpr expressed enthusiasm, noting the car's potential and its exciting project status. Meanwhile, @knuckles-r-busted found a charming aspect in the vehicle's front end, describing it as resembling a pleased face, and @addswheels commented on the car's attractiveness.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the car's project status and restoration potential. @oroad and @watry acknowledged the vehicle's fair condition for a restoration, with @oroad emphasizing that everything necessary for restoring it is intact. @osobene questioned what makes it a 'project' if it's running, leading to @ajl1988 (The Seller) clarifying that it simply needs some additional care despite being operational, which sparked a thoughtful discussion among potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised about cosmetic imperfections and mechanical details of the vehicle. @ratedarrgh pointed out that the paint looked decent from afar but had visible issues up close. @jonc noted several missing small parts and questioned the authenticity of some features like the dash covering. Additionally, @okie_flats commented on modifications made to the brake system, advising caution about potential safety issues concerning the single circuit booster.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle, with the seller, @Squarebodyinc, continually promoting the vehicle's features such as its new starter setup that ensures reliable performance, which cost around $3k. @timmytoledo complimented the rig, noting its smooth driving characteristics, while @HFab shared fond memories and insights about the 6.5 diesel engine, endorsing the modifications made like the PMD relocation. Additionally, @Squarebodyinc highlighted that the vehicle has been well-maintained, with specifics like new carpet, upholstery, and a professional windshield installation contributing to its appeal as a daily driver.
Neutral: Questions arose regarding certain aspects of the vehicle's functionality, like the rear AC unit's non-operation as pointed out by @patclune, to which @Squarebodyinc elaborated on the needed cable adjustment for the actuator. Concerns about the turbo wastegate, raised by commenters such as @thesammon and @nothingwithyou, were met with an explanation from the seller regarding its wiring and the needed modifications. Furthermore, it was noted that the truck previously served with the Georgetown Fire Department in Connecticut, prompting inquiries about the vehicle's structural integrity and any potential rust, which @Squarebodyinc responded to saying the frame is in great condition with only minor surface rust.
Negative: Some negative comments emerged, particularly surrounding the vehicle's history and issues related to its components. @sherwood010 questioned the frequent starter replacements, hinting at possible underlining issues of the vehicle. Concerns were raised about the A/C system not functioning completely and opinions were shared on how the mechanics handled certain repairs, such as the wastegate being wired shut, which @thesammon found troubling. @elly18's critical observation regarding the low charging system voltage in videos posed further doubts about the vehicle's electrical integrity, alongside inquiries into past repairs and components used, indicating the need for extra assurance on the vehicle's reliability.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have praised the 2016 BMW X5 Diesel for its exceptional condition and low mileage for its age. @CO-Rayman remarked on its beautiful silver color, while @BDAS highlighted that the vehicle is a 2-owner car with a meticulous maintenance history of 28 service records. Furthermore, @Lodewyk emphasized the efficiency and performance of BMW's straight-6 engines, suggesting the X5 Diesel is a robust and economical option.
Neutral: Several discussions revolved around comparing the X5 Diesel with the Porsche Cayenne Diesel. @Baur2002 initiated this comparison by asking about the advantages and shortcomings of both vehicles. @BDAS provided insightful commentary, noting that while both offer similar performance and reliability, the Porsche is sportier but the X5 provides more luxury and space. Other commenters, like @Kutch_PSS, sought more information about the vehicle's usage history and the factory hitch functionality, indicating a keen interest in understanding the X5's past.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's service records. @Bigoofy questioned the lack of detailed service invoices despite the Carfax claiming a well-maintained history, suggesting potential risks for prospective buyers. Additionally, inquiries about specific features, such as the adaptive cruise control system and the status of recalls, hinted at uncertainty among bidders. @DanIP2580 also pointed out discrepancies in the vehicle's color listing across various records, raising further flags about its documentation.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GLCTraveler commented on the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle, reminiscing about their first truck build in 1976, which was also orange and caught attention like this one. They expressed their admiration for the vehicle, pointing out that it looks 'hot' and seemed to appreciate its design, showing a connection to the vehicle's style.
Neutral: @Darin21 (The Seller) provided details about the vehicle's components, confirming that the vehicle has no hard or soft top. They also addressed questions about the vehicle's drivability, stating that it should be able to make the trip to Chicago, placing the responsibility of legality on the buyer's end. Furthermore, they clarified that picture 25 showcased a fiberglass fender and assured that the vehicle rides fine.
Negative: @douglassjohnson pointed out that the bezel of the vehicle is upside down, which is a notable flaw. They also questioned the absence of hard or soft tops since only the bikini top is mentioned, indicating a concern over the vehicle's functionality. Additionally, @Skibumm raised questions about potential issues, asking whether the cracking seen in a specific picture is paint on the fiberglass or sheet metal, which suggests there might be concerns regarding the vehicle's overall condition.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the impressive, sleek appearance and craftsmanship of the Karmann Ghia. @Buyingformywife mentioned its pristine condition, expressing that it looks too clean to be driven. @DOBRHI praised the car’s beauty and classic colors, while @Ford1rr and @moonbeam996GT3 noted it was among the best cars they’ve seen in person and recognized the car's proper build and visually appealing design. Overall, reviewers consistently found the Ghia to be a stunning vehicle, with particular admiration for the engine bay and added details like effective modifications.
Neutral: Several comments offer additional insights or requests for more information about the Karmann Ghia. @SuperMexHB pointed out the appealing color combination and requested more photographs of the car's structural integrity, while @Foothill74 raised a question regarding a possible bumper misalignment. @probass and @arkijak sought clarification on the modifications and features, such as the presence of seat belts and specifics about the engine. These inquiries demonstrate a sincere interest in understanding more about the car’s condition and history.
Negative: On the downside, some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's features and potential issues. @LosalZ noted the absence of air conditioning, prompting discussions about the comfort level during drives in extreme heat. @Foothill74 questioned the car's accident history after noticing what appeared to be damage in one of the photos, to which @911r (The Seller) assured that the car had no history of accidents. Furthermore, there were discussions about paint imperfections, with @probass expressing disappointment about not seeing those in provided pictures, suggesting a lack of transparency regarding the vehicle's cosmetic condition.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The seller, @torelloamerican, presents the SL500 as a meticulously cared-for vehicle, sharing numerous photos and videos that showcase its features. Bidders have expressed interest in the clarity of the vehicle's conditions, with @torelloamerican confirming that any potential doubts or questions are being addressed carefully. For instance, @torelloamerican acknowledges inquiries about the convertible top and mentions that there have been thorough checks for leaks or malfunctions, ensuring potential buyers that the car is in great condition overall.
Neutral: Several interested parties like @SDuisen and @Carterbritt sought clarifications regarding specific aspects of the vehicle, including the status of the soft top and the sound system. @torelloamerican responded to all inquiries, confirming that the Bose sound system is stock and discussing the soft top's maintenance history. Additionally, @VTBenz requested larger photos of service records, indicating that potential buyers value comprehensive documentation of the car’s history.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback regarding the car's maintenance, some commenters raised concerns about potential issues. @MattWalt expressed confusion as to why there were no bids on the vehicle, suggesting that there may be underlying problems not immediately visible. Furthermore, the mention of the vehicle's past color discrepancy as a 'clerical error' by @torelloamerican raises questions about transparency and could deter some potential buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GreenvilleSteve expressed a strong admiration for the Land Cruiser, appreciating its design and mentioning the treatment of the undercarriage, which suggested to them a measure of care taken to prevent rust. They described it as a 'really nice ride', indicating overall satisfaction with the vehicle's appearance and potential durability.
Neutral: @Scott4444, the seller and owner, provided clarification on the vehicle's history. They emphasized that the Carfax reports correspond to cosmetic repairs for minor dents and restoration work conducted during their ownership by a local specialist. The focus was on the comprehensive restoration, noting that the vehicle has never been involved in a major collision.
Negative: @ethielen remarked on the vehicle's loudness, suggesting that its noise level is notable both while arriving and departing. While the comment does not explicitly criticize the vehicle's performance, it implies that the sound might be a consideration for potential buyers who prefer a quieter ride.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The Ducati Diavel Carbon is receiving positive attention for its condition and maintenance history. @TheObsidianCollection (The Seller) has ensured that the bike has had all required services performed, including a recent oil change and inspection by Ducati. Commenters appreciate the bike's aftermarket exhaust, smooth acceleration, and overall cleanliness, with the seller providing transparency about the maintenance and services completed. Enthusiastic feedback from @H2R indicates a personal interest in the motorcycle and highlights its potential for impressive performance and ride quality, further enhancing its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries from potential buyers have been made regarding the specifics of recent services and the bike's components. @keithfitz's question about the servicing history was answered by @TheObsidianCollection, confirming all services are up-to-date. Other comments also pointed out details about the number of keys, tire date codes, and exhaust installation which have been addressed, indicating a clear channel of communication between the seller and interested parties. Furthermore, @H2R adds industry insights on maintenance schedules that may serve as valuable information for potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the bike's exhaust and whether any necessary reprogramming was performed after modifications, with @GBINAZ specifically questioning this. @TheObsidianCollection acknowledged the lack of records about the exhaust installation but reassured that the bike operates smoothly. Additionally, there was some skepticism regarding the necessity of an ECU re-map after the installation of the aftermarket slip-on exhaust, pointing to potential issues buyers may consider before making a purchase. Overall, while the bike is well-maintained, there are lingering questions that some potential buyers have about its modifications and service history.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dollycat3 finds the Monte Carlo absolutely beautiful and loves the color combination. @Mordizzle expresses that it is the best of the Monty Cs, indicating strong admiration. @19Willys46 also appreciates the car, mentioning he was looking for a similar model when he purchased his Mustang GT convertible.
Neutral: Several commenters seek clarification on technical details, with @2009G8GT questioning the accuracy of the description regarding the transmission, and @rayfinkle05 asking for confirmation on the engine and transmission. @Entzuckt adds relevant historical context about the available engines and transmissions for the Monte Carlos, suggesting expertise in this area. @markcbills and @gauldingr both inquire about the functionality of the air conditioning, indicating a need for more information.
Negative: @gauldingr criticizes the seller (@Justinbritt) for not being active in answering questions during the auction, which may hurt bidding confidence. @19Willys46 suggests an underlying hesitance to sell, hinting at a lack of commitment from the seller. @fisherb03 raises concerns about the car's performance, questioning if it runs or shifts properly, given its low mileage over the last five years.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @fauxtool commented on the striking appearance of the vehicle, noting that the deep blue paint is stunning and likely looks incredible in person. @Rangoon_Red expressed that the car has great potential for restoration, describing it as having 'great bones' that would make it a handsome ride once polished. Overall, there is a consensus among commenters about the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and potential as a stylish classic.
Neutral: @Rangoon_Red brought up concerns regarding the high amount of scratches observed in the back seat center console and inquired about possible damage from pets. In response, @Collectibleclassics mentioned that such scratches could result from the use of softer materials commonly found in BMWs from this era but didn't confirm the specific cause. Additionally, @DJP1124 inquired about the lack of service records and whether common engine issues had been previously addressed, demonstrating some caution regarding the vehicle's maintenance history.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the condition of the interior of the vehicle, particularly with @Rangoon_Red pointing out the scratches on the rear center console and asking if there were other signs of dog damage. Furthermore, @DJP1124 highlighted the absence of any service records, which could indicate potential issues with maintenance and raise doubts about the history of the car's engine problems. While @Collectibleclassics reassured that there were no leaks or pressing issues, the lack of detailed service documentation remains a notable drawback for prospective buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its fabulous design and elegant mid-century style. @Dollycat3 praised the gorgeous interior and design of the Series 62, while @lincolnsandcaddies noted the car's easily recognizable quad headlights and shared a love for Cadillacs. The Seller, @ammpasha, shared their excitement about the restoration process of the car, which took seven years, and mentioned its low mileage and well-sorted condition, inviting others to check it out in person.
Neutral: Commenters shared their nostalgic memories associated with the vehicle, such as @pcchuck recalling their dad's 57 Cadillac and preferences for the 58 due to its unique features. @mickeyamo reflected on seeing a similar car in the early eighties, emphasizing the continuum of care the vehicle has received, while @TJClassic whimsically connected the car to elegant mid-century modern homes in Palm Springs. The Seller encouraged inquiries and indicated their willingness to discuss the car's history further.
Negative: While the vehicle has garnered mostly positive comments, there was a query from @Belhambra1 regarding the absence of air conditioning. @ammpasha clarified that the car does not come with AC but noted that it could be added. Additionally, @mickeyamo's inquiry about the car's tires hinted at a desire to know more about its original condition, though the Seller was unable to confirm specifics regarding the tires. Overall, there was very little negative sentiment about the vehicle itself.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlighted the car's appeal as a fun summer driver, with @jasonTDI noting it ticks all the right boxes. Additionally, @RIGGER expressed admiration, stating the car is "smashing." The seller, @MalamutAutoMuseum, emphasized the extensive maintenance and over $75,000 spent on repairs, assuring potential buyers of the car's condition and enhancements made for an owner who values perfection.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on the vehicle's maintenance history and technical details. @PorscheTeam raised questions about engine repairs despite low mileage, while @JGordon5454 expressed curiosity about the car's upkeep, weighing the benefits of its maintenance against potential future costs. @Cbates69 inquired about smog emission compliance, which @MalamutAutoMuseum confirmed was satisfactory as per the latest test.
Negative: Comments also reflected concerns regarding the vehicle's history. @JGordon5454 questioned whether the extensive maintenance indicated reliability or a potential money pit. @Doug78 asked for details about front damage and airbag issues, expressing important safety concerns. Moreover, @rocketron suggested that more extensive engine repairs might have been warranted, highlighting the intricacies and uncertainties surrounding the vehicle's condition.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is praised for its aesthetic appeal, described as 'pretty' and 'gorgeous' with a striking combination of colors and luxurious features such as a power retractable hardtop and a high-quality Bose sound system. The seller, @aegmotorsports, highlights the reliability of the 3.2L V6 engine, which is known for its dependability and performance. They also mention recent maintenance efforts, including the rebuilding of the convertible top's hydraulic components and an oil change, assuring potential buyers about the vehicle's readiness for sale.
Neutral: The seller provides detailed specifications about the 2001 Mercedes Benz R170 SLK320, including its features, engine specifications, and auction details. The vehicle is part of a no reserve auction, which could appeal to buyers looking for a competitive price. The seller also responds to various inquiries regarding upgrades like backup cameras and Bluetooth systems, indicating their willingness to connect interested parties with local shops for installation services. While specifics about the vehicle's past service history were limited, the seller outlines the vehicle's inspection and maintenance process, offering some peace of mind.
Negative: However, several potential buyers expressed concerns about the lack of detailed maintenance records from previous ownership, which raises doubts about the vehicle's overall condition prior to the seller's acquisition. @willy and others requested specific information regarding the car's brake measurements, AC functionality, and inspection processes, indicating a desire for more transparency before making a purchase decision. The seller's responses, while informative, may come off as somewhat dismissive, especially regarding the need for extensive inspections and the lack of documented service history, leaving some prospective buyers worried about potential hidden issues.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle for its stunning aesthetics and quality, highlighting the gorgeous black paint paired with red leather interior as a particularly beautiful combination. @jturner describes the car as "gorgeous," while @marcsoc notes the impressively low mileage since its rebuild. @sgregoryindiana and @Stingtracy both express admiration for the vehicle's attention to detail and restoration quality, with @gregoryindiana specifically appreciating the banjo steering wheel and the overall visual appeal. Overall, commenters agree that this car is an exquisite example of the MGA and conveys a sense of envy and aspiration.
Neutral: The seller, @850i, provides detailed insights about the car's features and restoration process, addressing questions regarding its hood and engine specifications. The seller mentions the difficulties in photographing certain aspects, such as the hood and trunk alignment, ensuring that potential buyers are informed about the car's condition and highlighting upgrades like the new air cleaners and exhaust system. Some commenters, such as @CoastsideCat, suggest improvements for promotional materials, specifically calling for more engaging driving videos to better exhibit the vehicle's capabilities.
Negative: While most comments are overwhelmingly positive, a few users expressed concerns about specific details. @FGP questioned the alignment of the trunk gap in a particular photo, suggesting it may need adjustment, while @Mrtinwoodie raised a point about the positioning of the turn signal jewel, asking if any modifications were made to the dashboard. Additionally, @Chase68 mentioned that some aspects, like the leather wrap on the steering wheel, may not be universally preferred. These comments hint at the high standards and expectations that come with purchasing such a finely restored classic car.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many users express excitement about the vehicle listing, with @Jely_obs94, the seller, highlighting their enthusiasm for the auction platform and commitment to transparency by promising future cold start and driving videos. @jkmanz recalls fond memories, stating that the truck is identical to the one their grandfather bought, indicating a positive emotional connection. There’s also appreciation from users regarding the satisfactory operation of some vehicle features, such as power mirrors, showing that some users are pleased with the basic functionality of the vehicle.
Neutral: Comments from @Jely_obs94 include clarifications about the vehicle's history and maintenance. They confirm the original purchase date and previous maintenance records, stating that they've replaced fluids and tires. Additionally, inquiries about issues with the windows, air conditioning system, and potential leaks have led to neutral responses where the seller acknowledges the points raised and promises further investigation, displaying a balanced approach to addressing concerns.
Negative: A few users, such as @toddogles and @sleepyairplane, voice skepticism regarding the seller's claims and the vehicle's condition, questioning the accuracy of mileage reported and potential mechanical issues, like hot start problems with the transmission. Concerns are raised about the state of the vehicle's windows and A/C system, and the seller admits to some malfunctions, prompting users to suggest further repairs. Overall, there is a sense of doubt about the vehicle's reliability, reflecting some negative sentiment among potential buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm about the vehicle's specifications and features. @CKart praises the wonderful specifications, while @Surf likes the great color combination. @genevamotorcars (The Seller) shares a road test video, adding value to the listing. @Txtriathlete asks about the vehicle's amenities, specifically the heated steering wheel and massaging seats, to which @genevamotorcars confirms massaging seats are indeed available. @Hargo appreciates the Night Vision feature, calling it a conversation starter, and @mlowengrub also remarks on the appealing color combination. Overall, the feedback highlights positive aspects of the car and its features.
Neutral: The comments contain several inquiries about the vehicle's maintenance history and details. @Mmade22 requests maintenance records from the fourth owner, particularly regarding an extended period without documented service. @genevamotorcars responds they performed a 92-point inspection, indicating the car was in good condition, with some minor replacements made. Other commenters, such as @GarretMach and @Cedesguy, ask about specific features, like the Keyless-go button, and potential issues like oil leaks from cam seals, which @genevamotorcars assures are not present.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about the car's condition and history. @jwcunningham65 highlights that the Carfax report shows multiple battery replacements, prompting inquiries about low usage. @ForidaCracker1996 raises issues regarding the driver's front wheel well and the possibility of damage, asking for additional pictures. Although @genevamotorcars assures there is no damage, @ForidaCracker1996 appreciates the clarification but notes concerns about a missing radiator support splash shield. Overall, these comments reflect skepticism about the vehicle's overall condition.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Super-Dave commented on the vehicle's impressive build, expressing admiration. @MarkBartlett noted that the first photo of the vehicle is particularly eye-catching. @Frozenoak expressed a strong desire to buy the vehicle if they had the financial means, wishing the seller good luck with the sale.
Neutral: @Pathfinder1806 indicated a personal preference for different photos, suggesting that pic 5 or 9 would have been better to showcase the vehicle while still acknowledging its great looks. @Mhouston8 inquired about the possibility of videos being posted soon regarding the vehicle's features. The seller, @PopsLercel, replied affirmatively to the request for videos and committed to posting one soon.
Negative: @Adammarshall1983 raised a concern about a potential crack near the roof corner, questioning whether it is a crack or simply a line from a paint protection film (PPF). In response, @PopsLercel clarified that there is indeed a 1.5 inch long crack alongside the PPF line. Additionally, @jrassured asked about the engine's horsepower and the revs at 60 mph, to which @PopsLercel provided information about the engine's specs and cruising RPM.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Ethibault1 described the vehicle as a "pretty little thing" and wished they could take it off the seller's hands, wishing them good luck. @investgeorge (The Seller) noted that the car runs fantastic, is a lot of fun to drive, and has been recently serviced, stating that it only needs to be driven and enjoyed. Additionally, the seller mentioned that the car has been garage kept since their ownership, emphasizing its solid condition and encouraging potential buyers to reach out with questions.
Neutral: @HankHorders inquired about the location of the vehicle for an in-person inspection, while @1329Guy made an observation regarding a past air conditioning system in the car, expressing curiosity about its conversion to a carburetor. The seller acknowledged these observations and explained the reasoning behind the fuel injection system's replacement, indicating that the carburetor performed optimally despite any theoretical advantages of fuel injection.
Negative: @aljogav raised concerns about the replacement of fuel injection with a carburetor, questioning if fuel injection would be superior and expressing skepticism about the decision. The seller responded by explaining that the previous owner encountered issues with the fuel injection system, suggesting that new technology can sometimes require time to perfect and ultimately finding value in the simplicity of the carburetor setup, despite the challenges of the original fuel injection.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters express enthusiasm for the 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK63 AMG Cabriolet, particularly praising its design and condition. @SDSUAztecAMG describes the vehicle as a 'beast' and 'sexy,' noting its rarity on the road and remarking on its beautiful condition for a 17-year-old car. They appreciate the seller's responsiveness, which adds a positive touch to their experience with the auction. @collectibleclassics, the seller, emphasizes their commitment to transparency with an extensive list of documentation and videos to ensure bidders feel confident in their purchase.
Neutral: Commenters bring up legitimate inquiries regarding the vehicle’s maintenance and features. @Nero_Tenebre questions the relevance of previous road tests mentioned for the earlier CLK model, while others, such as @tacshose and @Gossir00, ask about service records and general conditions of the brakes and other components. @Josedluca specifically seeks confirmation about potential leaks from the convertible top and any mechanical leaks, which @collectibleclassics addresses, confirming the top is functioning well without leaks.
Negative: Some potential concerns are raised about the vehicle's engine and overall mechanical condition, with @crowdejr and @tacshose pointing out issues such as a 'startup rattle,' which suggests possible camshaft problems. @w20110mercedes raises suspicion about oil on the passenger side and the status of the head bolts, asking for service records to be disclosed. Comments indicate a sense of caution, as bidders consider these potential issues along with the seller's claims about the engine's health.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @AliceAustin describes the vehicle as a nice Moke, expressing a wish to have bid on it if it hadn't had to travel to Rhode Island for her own purchase. @Wakemaker adds to the praise by stating that everyone should own a Moke at least once, highlighting its beauty. @Dandan401 shares their own positive experience owning a Moke, showing enthusiasm for the vehicle and a desire to connect with others who appreciate it. @Valkyrja makes a comparison between this Moke and an EV Moke, implying that the Moke deserves better treatment in the market due to its superior qualities.
Neutral: @Renault60 (The Seller) provides several details about the Moke. He explains that over the past three years, only routine maintenance has been performed, ensuring the vehicle is in good working condition. He notes that the title claims this is an actual mileage vehicle, although he acknowledges the complications with the KPH speedometer, given the vehicle's Ohio title. @isill and @serrano4657 inquire about possible repairs and mechanical specifics, and @Renault60 responds by confirming there is no need for repairs and provides compression readings, noting the vehicle runs strong.
Negative: Concerns arise from @Pubecanoe regarding the VIN number, questioning its authenticity and noting discrepancies. @lutzup expresses interest in comparing the motor to a 1275, suggesting that there may be issues worth examining. @user123 asks about car seat capacity, implicitly suggesting that the space might not be practical for families. Overall, while the vehicle garners considerable interest and praise, there are ongoing questions about its specifications and practicality.
|
16k-Mile 2001 Ford F-550 XLT Super Duty Power Stroke 4×4 Dually Mini Pumper
1FDAF57F11ED50697
Lot 198018
Dealer
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle, noting its appealing design and utilitarian purpose. @ferrariforever commends the truck, referring to it as a "nice rig" and appreciates its potential for fire suppression use on rural properties. Additionally, @boaboyoz describes the F-550 mini pumper truck as a 'handsome fella' and suggests that it is ready for work, contributing to its overall attractiveness. Finally, @William_Mo highlights the truck's low hours, its adjustable water pressure, and the presence of a powerful Diahatsu diesel engine along with a 600-gallon metal water tank, showcasing its capability and value.
Neutral: Comments include a wealth of technical information provided by @William_Mo (The Seller), highlighting the truck's specifications such as the engine model and pump type, as well as maintenance details like the warranty information and construction date. @newcarpro offers extensive build information, including various technical specifications, which gives potential buyers transparency about the vehicle's construction and functionality. There is also mention of the truck's features like the electric retractable hose reel, which consider utility but do not heavily lean towards a positive or negative perspective.
Negative: Concerns arise primarily about regulations and paperwork. @Gballer82 questions the truck's eligibility for registration in California, to which @William_Mo confirms that it cannot be registered there due to CARB compliance issues. Additionally, @ampeng inquires about the availability of build sheets or maintenance documents, indicating a concern for buyer due diligence, which @William_Mo states he does not possess. This absence of documentation can lead to uncertainty for potential buyers regarding the vehicle's history and condition.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters provided high praise for the vehicle's aesthetics and performance features. @sludgo expressed enthusiasm for driving a stick shift, while @icecreamking99 and @PlanC highlighted standout features such as the aero kit and various upgrades, describing the car as stunning. @WishfulThinker23 also complimented the impressive appearance of the 911, emphasizing the significance of potential video presentations. Meanwhile, @Speedy4 noted that the car met all their criteria for an ideal vehicle, showcasing a collective appreciation for its design and capabilities.
Neutral: There were several inquiries about the vehicle, particularly regarding its original MSRP and aftermarket modifications. @mks94539 requested the original MSRP, and @mikeymajor asked about the specific aftermarket components installed on the car, to which @dburr123 responded with details about the exhaust and included OEM parts. @F1Tabes raised a logistical question regarding title assignment for tax purposes in Texas, to which the seller responded positively, indicating an openness to that arrangement.
Negative: A few comments hinted at potential issues or concerns with the vehicle's presentation. @JSRay expected that the seller would remove certain stickers, indicating a preference for a cleaner look. There was also a subtle critique implied in @PlanC's comment about the possible deletion of branding stickers prior to the photo shoot, suggesting a concern about authenticity in the listing. Despite these concerns, the overall sentiment towards the car remained largely positive.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @jameslgleason appreciates the nice stance of the vehicle, describing it as looking mean. @SMDenver also enjoys the stance and shares a personal connection by mentioning their ongoing project with a 1965 Convertible. @Myoldcut fondly reminisces about high school in the late 70s and early 80s, finding the car a fun driver, although it may not excel in car shows. @valiantjim expresses nostalgia for the era this car represents, indicating its throwback appearance resonates with them. @Pettyfan43 sees the classic style as a reminder of their own past, and @MakeItGoBrrrrrr is enthusiastic about the sound of the vehicle, indicating it captures attention.
Neutral: @Dorrocks (The Seller) shares details about his intent when buying and modifying the vehicle, emphasizing it was meant to be a daily driver rather than a show car. He states that he focused on practical modifications and daily use, leaving the paint job aside. Additionally, @Dorrocks addresses various inquiries about the vehicle, ensuring potential buyers understand aspects such as the status of the lien, the paint and build work, and minor rust issues that exist in specific areas of the car. The seller aims to clarify his responsibility regarding the lien and title transfer, which seems to be a concern for potential buyers like @IBDABIGMAN and @thight9191.
Negative: @halmar is critical of the vehicle's aesthetics, specifically pointing out the jacked-up rear end and oversized tires as detrimental to its style. @Rmodel65 raises concerns about the use of air shocks, suggesting they could cause long-term damage to the vehicle's structure. @doctorgonz0 asks about potential leaks from water entering through the cowl, highlighting the common issues with older Mustangs, while @Jman3710 queries about what appears to be significant rust damage in the floor. These comments reflect a clear apprehension regarding the vehicle's condition and quality, alongside critiques of its overall look.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BTG88 mentions that the vehicle is fun and sporty for driving both on back roads and highways, and appreciates that it is a true four-seater. @Captdavid has owned multiple Saab turbo convertibles, expressing enjoyment for the fun driving experience, particularly with the manual transmission, while also noting their reliability and good fuel efficiency. @stephoverton (The Seller) shares emotional value for the car, having owned it for 21 years, and emphasizes its meticulous maintenance and improvements made such as the custom leather upholstery and the replacement convertible top, indicating overall pride in ownership.
Neutral: @Chase68 appreciates the unique features of the final-year Commemorative Edition, noting its extra horsepower and commending the no-reserve auction setup. However, @Chase68 criticizes the photo quality, suggesting better lighting and positioning for showcasing the car. @Tigers196884 points out that the listing contains only 56 photos, which is relatively low, while @GLWTA also comments on the automated link mishap regarding car testing data, signaling a connection to the overall mixed experience with the car's listing.
Negative: @JIMMY expresses concerns about a potentially dead battery causing acid damage and suggests that better photos and detailing would enhance the car's appeal. @carreram questions the presence of oil leaks and the condition of the clutch among other mechanical aspects, implying worries about the vehicle's performance. @hockeyhose10 inquires about the functionality of other systems like air conditioning, while @phred14 asks if the car is currently road-licensed, which hints at uncertainty regarding its usability.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters share enthusiastic views about the Scout's build quality and aesthetics. @tlcamg praises the rig as a 'great looking Scout' with a 'very nice build', while @boaboyoz describes it as a 'metallic green dream' and a 'fanbloodytastic build'. @Momobeamer finds the color scheme appealing and expresses excitement about its fun driving experience, wishing good luck to the seller. @Captainpua and @Emelton24 also complement the unique aspects of the Scout, with Emelton24 noting it as a 'truly one of one' build.
Neutral: The seller, @Platinummotorspdx, frequently interacts with potential buyers, providing detailed updates on the Scout's features and recent services. They share information about the auction's no-reserve terms and invite bidders to ask questions, addressing concerns about air intake issues raised by @JAR46 and @INeedThisCar by confirming video demonstrations will be provided. They also clarify the specifications regarding A/C availability and the removable hardtop mentioned by @dhudson51, ensuring transparency.
Negative: Some comments indicate areas for improvement, particularly regarding built quality and gaps in doors and tailgates as pointed out by @Cpatrick83. This individual raises concerns about potential paint issues, even while acknowledging the color choices. Additionally, @AnythingScoutOfficial recommends future technical considerations for the new owner, like securing brake lines and ensuring proper airflow for the radiator to prevent overheating, hinting at some underlying issues that need attention.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning features and aesthetics. @Jonesy66 refers to the vehicle as "the dark prince," adding a charismatic flair to its identity. @gscharnagl appreciates the Vossen wheels, asking for additional details about them, while @Dukakos23 simply states that the S65 is "stunning!" Additionally, @mlowengrub playfully states that "Lord Vader, your chariot awaits," further reinforcing the vehicle's impressive allure. The general consensus among several commenters, including @cottrd, emphasizes the quality of the S65, noting its durability and reputation for longevity.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about the original wheels and accessories related to the vehicle. @Ant3Liu asks whether the original wheels are included, which @Dennis_precisionMI (The Seller) confirms are indeed part of the sale. Similarly, @Nacoocheejohn and @gscharnagl seek clarification on the availability of paint meter readings and the original exhaust, showing an interest in the vehicle's condition and history. @Dennis_precisionMI (The Seller) provides several answers, noting that the condition of some parts, including the burl wood trim behind the driver’s seat, was already as observed during their purchase and was not a significant issue for them.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the vehicle's originality and condition, particularly regarding unusual features such as the burl wood trim in the rear. @sdrcp expresses discomfort regarding this mismatch, commenting on how it disrupts their aesthetic preference. Additionally, @nikisupreme questions the need for the replacement of both lower control arms despite the car's low mileage, hinting at possible underlying issues. @Dennis_precisionMI (The Seller) responds to these concerns, explaining that the replacement was due to hydraulic fluid leakage, emphasizing the proactive maintenance done to ensure ride quality despite the car's age and mileage.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Kennysgreen280z describes the vehicle as extreme and finds it to be an impressive build. @Cristian0467 thinks it is perfect, while @Deathstar24 is pleased with the 8.5" rear end that he considers superior to the previous model. @anthonyjp appreciates the vehicle's cool sleeper status and @addswheels is very positive about its overall build quality, labeling it as outstanding.
Neutral: @Exeter has a couple of inquiries regarding the vehicle, asking for the glove box RPO code sticker and raising questions about the condition of the interior and whether there is a carpet dash saver, suggesting some uncertainty about the original dash condition.@TexZR2 simply asks if the AC works, which is a standard inquiry potential buyers often have. @Hondacarguy is interested in the tuning details, specifically whether the vehicle is tuned on HP Tuners and for which type of fuel it is optimized.
Negative: @RSCFrank (The Seller) provides detailed responses that indicate some issues with the truck, including a damaged original front fascia and a cracked original dash underneath a plastic cover, which might raise concerns for potential buyers about the vehicle's interior quality. There is some indication that while the vehicle has been well maintained and passes emissions tests, the state of the dash might detract from the overall appeal. The need for modifications and repairs may also discourage certain buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the excellent condition of the vehicle, noting it as a 'lovely condition Raider' and 'time-capsule clean' with low miles and zero rust, showcasing good preservation. @krudmuphin highlights the durability of the Mitsubishi 4G54 engine, comparing it favorably to the Toyota 22R, and @Travis_H. mentions the fun driving experience the first generation provides. @Jay_PA shares nostalgic feelings, recalling his previous ownership of a similar model and expressing admiration for this well-preserved example. The Seller, @Rwwilliams777, engages positively with the community, emphasizing the vehicle's investment potential and inviting questions, while also detailing its history and features.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle's features include inquiries about the air conditioning, with @Stepside4x4 asking for details about its operation. Other commenters express mild curiosity about the engine's timing chain and share that they appreciate the aesthetic and historical connections of the vehicle, like @1996MBZ mentioning it would be desirable in different colors. @KD914 clarifies the relationship between the Dodge Raider and Mitsubishi Montero, suggesting a simple rebranding rather than a distinct model. @ColeTrain asks about technical specifications and expresses satisfaction with the information provided.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the vehicle's history of low mileage, with @claysclassiccars questioning how it could sit idle for so long without issues, prompting @Rwwilliams777 to clarify the previous owner's limited use. Additionally, a few comments imply skepticism about the vehicle's ability to handle modern driving conditions or maintain its mechanical integrity given its age. @SaabSnob raises an irrelevant point about a 'bouncy seat,' which some may perceive as trivial amid the serious discussions about the Raider's condition.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg praises the vehicle as a 'very nice Mondial Cabriolet' highlighting its attractive color scheme of Rosso Corsa over Beige with a Black top, and expresses enthusiasm with 'Bellissima!'. @mfoncerrada comments that this model is one of the best bargains in the automotive world, indicating strong value. @Husseys describes the car as a 'great looking car' that appears fun to drive, showcasing the general appreciation for its design and driving experience. @AKSOLDIT (The Seller) shows commitment to engaging with potential buyers, offering to answer questions and assist with shipping.
Neutral: @AKSOLDIT (The Seller) mentions that additional photos have been added to the listing at @bringatrailer's request, demonstrating a willingness to provide more information. @Kemal inquires about a work order for the engine service, showing interest in the vehicle's maintenance history. @jimbis requests clarification about the condition of the convertible top latches and whether photos can be included, illustrating potential buyers' focus on the car's operational aspects. @Doc1965 asks why the seller is selling the car after a short time, providing context for the seller's motivations.
Negative: @jimbis expresses concern about the condition of the convertible top latches, questioning whether both are functioning correctly. @Knuckles-R-Busted notes that while Ferrari has produced many beautiful models, some may find this series less desirable as they age. @oldcanuck comments that the car would look better without the 'fake shields,' suggesting a preference for authenticity over embellishments. @JJJFrom80112 shares a frustrating personal experience with latches on a similar model, indicating potential difficulties for future owners looking for parts. @Alden856 highlights the difficulty in sourcing replacement parts for the latches, expressing concerns about potential issues with the vehicle's maintenance.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @troy_hall commented that the bike looks good and just needs a startup video, expressing enthusiasm for the model as someone who has owned similar KZ-1000 bikes before. He appreciated the write-up done by BAT, indicating a generally positive impression of the bike and its promotion. Overall, there's a sense of excitement from potential buyers about the bike's appearance and prospect.
Neutral: @Vintagecorvette (The Seller) mentioned that the bike runs and is rideable, promising to provide a cold start video soon, while explaining the delay with the ride video due to weather conditions. @dtl2000 expressed interest in the bike's condition and its history, also noting the auxiliary oil cooler and wondering about modifications. Though he mentioned a ding in the tank, he still sees it as a fair condition option worth considering.
Negative: @thatsakillerpiece pointed out that based on the photos, it seems the bike has not been started since at least 2008, casting some doubt on its readiness for sale. @dtl2000 raised concerns regarding modifications to the bike with the auxiliary oil cooler and extra horns, questioning the reasoning behind these additions and expressing potential hesitation about the bike's authenticity. Overall, there are some reservations about the bike's long-standing inactivity and historical modifications.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @kevin5571 (The Seller) has received compliments on the vehicle's overall condition and cleanliness. @Alfamilano expressed appreciation for the clean truck and thanked @kevin5571 for providing videos. @kevin5571 (The Seller) also mentioned that the truck is beautiful and clean inside and out, further emphasizing its good state which has attracted potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about the air conditioning functionality, with @Robertkauffman and @Alfamilano both asking whether it has AC. @kevin5571 (The Seller) confirmed that the A/C does not blow cold and will require a freon charge but noted that all electrical items like lights and locks function correctly. Additionally, comments from @go_og requested further details, including pictures of specific interior components and the vehicle's paint condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the air conditioning system, particularly from @go_og who noted the need for either a conversion or a service for the existing R-12 based A/C system to ensure cool air. The potential issue of corrosion behind the rear wheels was also mentioned, highlighting an area that requires attention. Furthermore, @Porschefollower pointed out a discrepancy in the engine specifications listed on the window sticker, suggesting possible errors in the vehicle's documentation.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TFDJR praised the vehicle, calling it an AWESOME car and noted that it was a standout at the Dr George Car Show, reaffirming its acclaim as a multiple show winner. @VintageMetal (The Seller) also shared that the car turns heads and leaves lasting impressions, highlighting how remarkable it is to see and hear on the road. Furthermore, the seller emphasized the meticulous attention to detail in the build, mentioning that all aspects of the design have been well thought out and executed beautifully, contributing to its overall quality and enjoyment while driving.
Neutral: There was a discussion about the vehicle's engine size, with @The_Owl questioning the description of the 468 ci engine without identifying its brand. @Jwr3 pointed out images that suggested the engine was a Chevy, while @FordNutt confirmed that a 468 is commonly known as an overbored 454 Chevy. @FunWithCars agreed with @The_Owl regarding the descriptions used, mentioning that car enthusiasts typically have different ways of communicating about engines. @1936_cab inquired about videos of the car running, which @VintageMetal (The Seller) confirmed were posted.
Negative: @The_Owl expressed confusion over the ambiguous engine description without specifying the make, suggesting that the seller could have provided clearer details. Additionally, @fstrnyu commented that it seemed like the wrong video had been uploaded, indicating a possible error in the presentation of the vehicle. The mixed feedback on the engine information and the video issue left some viewers uncertain about specifics regarding the car.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @obiqwak (The Seller) describes the E9 as a solid driver that rides well for a 50-year-old classic. Several commenters appreciate the car's aesthetic, noting the attractive Agave livery. @E9couper admires the gray cloth seats which complement the paint color, while @e9er expresses excitement about the car being a great weekend toy, particularly highlighting the Recaro seats as a superior option in terms of comfort. Another comment by @Bjaguar reinforces the notion of the car being a solid driver, showcasing confidence in the vehicle's quality as firsthand knowledge of driving it is also shared.
Neutral: @obiqwak (The Seller) responds to questions regarding the car's rust, detailing that most is located behind the left rear wheel well, but assures interested buyers that the car's core structure is solid. @whipcity76 suggests the car could serve better as a daily driver rather than returning it to showroom condition, acknowledging the non-original mechanical aspects of the car while appreciating its curb appeal. The discussion also reveals mixed feelings about the car's air conditioning system, with @whipcity76 sharing personal experience with similar issues, offering insight on possible alternatives if the new owner decides to address it.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the car's minor issues, like the air conditioning not producing cold air and a small coolant leak mentioned by @obiqwak (The Seller). @BR_549 inquires about the potential complexity of fixing engine-related issues, suggesting worries about maintenance. Furthermore, @TheVintageCarGuy raises a question regarding what seems to be a disconnection on the drive shaft in one of the pictures, hinting at possible mechanical questions or repairs that may be necessary. Overall, while many comments are positive, some apprehensions about potential repairs and maintenance highlight discrepancies in the car's condition.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: There are numerous positive comments about the vehicle's condition and features. @broncobob (The Seller) highlights that the Jeep's hardtop is uniquely designed for easy removal and replacement, noting there’s minimal wind noise when the sun visors are used. Additionally, @broncobob shares that the tires are original and in good condition, and he mentions the inclusion of aftermarket power windows, which are not common in this model. Commenters express excitement about the Jeep's unique features and its overall attractiveness, with one declaring, "Very cool Jeep!!"
Neutral: Several neutral comments focus on inquiries about the vehicle’s history and current status. @Uvacarbuff asks if the Jeep was ever flat towed behind an RV, while @ter777 and @kingfish1108 inquire about the original soft top and back seat. @broncobob explains the vehicle’s towing setup, noting that it was parked for years and is now being sold as part of a collection. Commenters appreciate the clarity in the vehicle information and the seller’s willingness to provide further details, including a reference to the VIN provided by @newcarpro.
Negative: Some negative feedback pertains to the vehicle's maintenance issues and the need for improvements. @e9er points out that mold is developing on the roll bar padding, suggesting it should be cleaned to prevent further deterioration. @broncobob acknowledges this concern and confirms that the mold has been addressed with cleaning products. Overall, while the Jeep has fans, there are valid concerns regarding maintenance that need to be attended to before the sale.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @austin_alfa describes the vehicle as a "stunner" and expresses admiration for its design and stout build, noting an impressive 75 HP engine. He appreciates the thorough care visible in the driving video and photos, commenting on the dry underside and the overall confidence it inspires. @Chris_A reflects fondly on his experience with a Borgward Isabella, highlighting its solid construction and good performance, calling it an "overbuilt" vehicle akin to Volvo in its reliability and comfort. @RidleysRides praises the beautiful design of the car, particularly the stunning two-tone paint that adds character to the Isabella. @Tom_S. also admires the car's appearance, affirming that it looks even prettier in sunny conditions than it did previously.
Neutral: @PacificMotorsWpg (The Seller) introduces the auction, emphasizing the extensive restoration work the previous owner put into the car, bringing it back to its original glory with a rich history. The seller mentions that while the car has a few gauge issues, many essential components like the lights and heater are operational, which assures potential buyers of its readiness for use. @srallen raises inquiries regarding the functionality of features such as the radio and gauges, indicating a degree of curiosity about the car's functionality, while @murphy007 seeks clarification on transportation for Canadian buyers, showing the potential challenges of cross-border sales.
Negative: @srallen points out that some gauges do not function as expected and expresses concern over the speedometer reading in miles instead of kilometers, indicating it was unexpected. The comments hint at some skepticism surrounding the car's value and market significance, as @Metubajohn mentions that if the car had a different brand badge, it would receive more deserved attention, implying a lack of appreciation in the current market. @Chiplamb recounts a conversation with a previous owner, underscoring the mixed perceptions surrounding the vehicle's reputation, where a retired rocket scientist declared it the best car he ever owned, yet the emphasis persists on how these cars remain underappreciated overall.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @kkellynan expressed excitement for the upcoming driving video, commenting on the beauty of the vehicle. @22truckie also noted the beauty of the truck, indicating a positive impression. @Sheltn4 complimented the visuals shared by @FC250 (The Seller), adding a playful note about the abundance of showcasing the truck, while @FC250 (The Seller) shared photos and expressed their enjoyment of sharing their trucks.
Neutral: @troutbear inquired about the presence of a small lever near the floor mat, demonstrating an interest in the vehicle's features. @gots2jump asked about the Chevrolet Bowtie inlaid in the floor, indicating curiosity about the restoration quality. Several comments highlighted the details provided by @FC250 (The Seller) regarding the truck's features and restoration process, contributing to the discussion's informative tone.
Negative: @555cruiser raised concerns regarding the brake system, questioning the potential leakage and wear of the tires, suggesting that a driving video would be beneficial to address these issues. @neilpierson25 lamented about rising storage costs not aligning with vehicle values, reflecting a negative sentiment regarding financial aspects of ownership. @FC250 (The Seller) acknowledged the age of the tires and expressed limitations on providing immediate driving footage, which may have added to concerns raised by other users.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @lloyddon1 (The Seller) introduces the auction for a 40th Anniversary Shelby KR, highlighting its extremely low mileage of 600 original miles and the brand new condition that makes it look as if it just came from the factory. Commenters like @BossPapa express excitement over the particular rarity and quality of the vehicle, remarking on the beauty of the Shelby Mustang. In addition, @Mysnake1969 praises the car as a beautiful example of a low mileage KR, further validating the exceptional nature of the vehicle in the auction.
Neutral: @justification mentions their surprise at the color options for Shelbys, acknowledging the variety. @Nacs gives a neutral comment indicating potential comparable options might exist, while @JIMSCAT brings up concerns about visible rust on specific parts but appreciates the vehicle's beauty. @DKeng provides insight into the rust issue, stating it is normal for these cars and offers reassurance regarding the condition of the vehicle, allowing for a balanced perspective on potential buyer concerns.
Negative: While many comments are largely positive, there are a few concerns raised. @sylgroeschl shares a personal story of having to sell their own Shelbys and expresses sorrow over it, indicating a longing for the vehicle despite an inability to bid. @JIMSCAT's remark about the rust suggests a potential deterrent for some interested buyers, and @frostycarguy humorously states they are no longer bidding after a mileage update. These comments reflect the mix of enthusiasm and concern typical in high-value car auctions.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @gabrielcraft praised the shorty front bumper and the Chou Seiki split three wheels as beautiful, highlighting the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle. @rockthatt (The Seller) confirmed the operation of the 4WD system and the rear sliding window, stating that both work great along with the sunroof and air conditioning. @Angel914 shared their positive experience with their own 4Runner, noting that it has 400k miles and still runs like new, showcasing the reliability associated with the Toyota 4Runner.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @jbirnie and @posetong, inquired about the vehicle's operational features and requested videos demonstrating the cold start and driving capabilities. @rockthatt (The Seller) addressed these inquiries by stating that they would take a video upon returning home and confirmed the vehicle's operations, indicating a willingness to engage with potential buyers. @StaceGhost also asked about the undercoating process, showing interest in the maintenance of the vehicle and its condition.
Negative: @sayfriend and @Nickgplv raised concerns about the rear bumper, questioning its installation and whether it might be aftermarket. @Dtxoreo noted a potential issue with the rear axle or transmission alignment, suggesting there could be mechanical concerns. @pnelsonrr also inquired about the timeline of the undercoating application, hinting at a lack of clarity surrounding the vehicle's maintenance history.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters are expressing excitement and admiration for the vehicle, particularly noting its low mileage. @thorpej enthusiastically points out the beauty of this specific E46, while @lemoo relates personally to the car, wishing good luck with the sale. The seller, @aSingh39, welcomes everyone to the auction and highlights the car's appealing features, encouraging questions and engagement from potential bidders.
Neutral: The seller provides information regarding the auction details and is responsive to questions, which indicates a professional approach. @aSingh39 answers queries from commenters regarding features and the car's condition, including the absence of a rear cargo cover and the mechanical state of the vehicle. Specific inquiries about previous repairs, rust, and the vehicle's history are addressed in a straightforward manner, with an invitation for inspections, indicating transparency.
Negative: There are some concerns about the vehicle's condition raised by commenters, particularly by @teicheira, who asks about the axle replacement, rust issues, and the headliner sagging. The seller clarifies that the axle replacement was due to common age-related wear, acknowledges there is some surface corrosion typical for a 22-year-old car, and addresses the age-related headliner sag. Despite these issues being common for the model, they may lead to hesitation among potential bidders.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments highlight the beauty and presentation of the vehicle. @Beerguy expresses admiration by calling it a 'beauty,' while @Coronette appreciates the car's final model year significance and its eye-catching Signal Red color. @Hulk2000 praises the seller's detail and transparency in providing information, remarking on @GCdelta's response as 'awesome.' Commenters also commend the car's well-maintained features, including the functional air conditioning and the solid condition of the armrest and dash, contributing to a positive overall impression of the vehicle.
Neutral: There are several inquiries concerning specific details about the vehicle, indicating that potential buyers are doing their due diligence. @Hulk2000 poses multiple questions about the car's condition, such as rust presence, fuel system integrity, and the status of the tires. @Lubedude1 asks about the toolkit and makes a note regarding the tires' condition. @mayart seeks clarification about a stain on the dashboard and requests additional photographs related to the car's VIN and performance. The seller, @GCdelta, responds to these inquiries, although some answers indicate uncertainties about the vehicle's full history.
Negative: A few concerns are raised about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the tires and certain aesthetic imperfections. @Hulk2000 points out visible dry rotting and cracking on the sidewalls of the tires, suggesting a need for replacement. @Lubedude1 comments on the condition of the toolkit, likening it to something that has been neglected. Additionally, @mayart raises a question about a stain on the dashboard, indicating it may require cleaning, which could detract from the vehicle's overall appeal. These issues suggest that while the car is generally well-regarded, it may need some attention regarding its upkeep.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments reflect positively on the vehicle, highlighting its strong features and condition. @bryndinhartman praises the robustness of the 7.3 diesel engine, while @ScottDaniel commends its exceptional maintenance. @MoxieSports appreciates the 4x4 capability, reinforcing the vehicle's reputation as a dependable pickup for various terrains. The seller, @Aubrey (The Seller), assures potential buyers of the truck's great condition, noting its minimal use, as evidenced by the bed and undercarriage's condition. Buyers are encouraged to bid confidently, emphasizing an added value through the Free 5 Year Maintenance program.
Neutral: Some comments inquire about additional details of the vehicle without expressing strong opinions. @RHG357 asks about the missing wheel caps, indicating curiosity about the truck's completeness. @MediocreMed1c seeks clarification on whether the truck is a long bed or short bed, which is a common concern for potential buyers. The seller responds promptly to these inquiries, providing the necessary information, which reflects a commitment to transparency during the sales process.
Negative: There are no significant negative comments about the vehicle itself; however, the inquiry about the missing wheel caps from @RHG357 might suggest a concern regarding its overall completeness or attractiveness. The lack of wheel caps could be viewed as a minor flaw, but @Aubrey (The Seller) reassures that they are easily obtainable, attempting to mitigate any negative perception this might impart. Overall, while there are questions regarding certain aspects of the truck, these do not detract from the overall positive sentiment expressed by potential buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle. @IshMoto, the seller, mentioned their decade-long ownership, highlighting its great condition and inviting potential buyers to reach out with any questions. @dillon410021 pointed out desirable features such as Fuchs wheels, sport seats, and the LSD transmission, noting them as unique selling points. @jimreillyjmr was particularly impressed by the car's condition and its local availability, reminiscing about their past experiences with the 944 T and appreciating the seller's ownership story video, suggesting a strong interest among viewers.
Neutral: Several comments contained clarifications and inquiries about the vehicle's condition and history, which included a question from @longforlineup regarding the timing belt. @IshMoto clarified that while the timing belt was last serviced in 2017, it had only seen minimal mileage since then and was checked by a local expert in 2023, who deemed it in satisfactory condition. @Quik944 echoed this sentiment, indicating confidence in the belt's status due to the car's limited use and recommending a re-tensioning after a short distance, which adds practical advice for prospective buyers.
Negative: On the downside, some concerns were raised regarding specifics of the vehicle’s maintenance. @longforlineup's question about the timing belt's status suggested a lack of transparency in the auction listing, and @IshMoto's admission that there is no recent paperwork related to the timing belt service might cause hesitation among potential bidders focusing on thorough documentation. Additionally, @jimreillyjmr's comment hinted at disappointment for missing opportunities to bid due to personal garage constraints, reflecting potential buyer frustration despite an overall positive outlook on the vehicle.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @oat2 highlights the uniqueness of the 2002 model, noting it as a special year for first-generation navigation. This year is appreciated by purists who value retro technology, despite certain challenges like upgrading to CarPlay due to integrated HVAC controls. @CMD1 expresses a strong preference for this generation of the LX, praising its ride quality and engine smoothness as superior to newer models.
Neutral: Some comments suggest the vehicle has a distinctive charm attributed to its retro features. However, they also acknowledge the limitations that come with older technology, such as the difficulty of integrating modern tech into the vehicle, which may affect its appeal to tech-savvy buyers.
Negative: Critics may point out the challenges posed by the outdated navigation system and the complicated retrofit options, making it less appealing for those who rely heavily on modern tech features. There might be concerns about the overall reliability of an older vehicle, especially when it comes to maintenance and availability of parts.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The auction for the 1987 BMW 325i Convertible hosted by @Collectibleclassics appears to be well-received, emphasizing their commitment to providing a smooth and transparent purchasing experience. With a strong rating of 4.9/5.0 on Google and numerous positive reviews, customers express confidence in the dealership's operations. The seller also highlights the car's historical significance, describing it as a symbol of BMW's engineering legacy and its appeal as a classic sports sedan, further drawing interest from potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries from potential buyers show curiosity regarding the vehicle's features and condition. Comments from @Soko121 and @mikeor specifically mention the convertible top's condition and the availability of heated seats, with the seller clarifying that the rear window is sealed but hazy, and that heated seats are not present. Additionally, @Steelyman asks about the functionality of the electrics, reflecting a common concern among buyers regarding the condition of used cars following previous owners' experiences.
Negative: Concerns arise from previous buyers' experiences as highlighted by @mikeor and @19Willys46, suggesting potential issues with the car's maintenance or repair history. @Tuck476 expresses anxiety about unresolved issues from the last auction, which may negatively impact buyer confidence. Comments point to complications from past transactions, with some buyers warning about hidden defects or required repairs that could translate into significant financial burdens.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MRC63 (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm about the 2014 Porsche Cayenne Diesel, highlighting it as a great combination of performance, efficiency, and luxury. They describe it as a fantastic daily driver that they have enjoyed immensely over the past few months. The seller is committed to being available throughout the auction to answer questions and provide further insights, inviting the community to participate actively in the bidding process.
Neutral: @sdwucf inquires about the details of an accident involving the vehicle, specifically asking about the circumstances that led to the airbags deploying. @MRC63 (The Seller) responds by providing limited information from the Carfax report, noting that the accident occurred when the vehicle was relatively new. They assure that it is a positive sign that the owner kept the vehicle for several years following the incident, suggesting that the damage may not have been severe.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the vehicle's accident history, particularly due to the mention of deployed airbags. @sdwucf is cautious and seeks clarification about the accident to determine if it might affect the vehicle’s integrity or value. Despite the seller's reassurance that the car has performed well since the incident, the lack of detailed accident information may leave some potential buyers apprehensive about the vehicle's history.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Stingtracy commented positively about the vehicle, describing it as a very nice 986 and highlighting its remarkable features such as the speed yellow color, great interior accents, low mileage, glass back window, and six-speed manual transmission. They believe it's a gem that will bring happiness to its next owner. @JKF011 also contributed to the positive feedback by simply stating that the car is 'VERY nice!'.
Neutral: @Jdean048 (The Seller) noted that they believe the bumper plugs are factory and provided details about their availability for potential bidders who may have questions or want additional pictures. They also mentioned scheduling a showing for potential buyers on Wednesday evening, inviting anyone interested in seeing or test driving the car to reach out for location details. This shows an open and accommodating attitude from the seller toward prospective buyers.
Negative: @JuceMan raised a question about the bumper plugs, indicating they could not locate them in speed yellow. Though this commentary does not provide a particularly negative impression of the vehicle itself, it reflects some concern or confusion regarding specifics of the car's details.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has been praised by its current owner @Kcsauto222, who claims it drives superbly and has no leaks. They appreciate its incredible looks, referring to it as the 'ST Lightning' and stating the interior is near flawless. The truck has been lightly used, with minimal wear and tear, and they express confidence in its quality, urging potential buyers to bid with assurance. Furthermore, @Uby67vw1958 and @Pettyfan43 shared positive experiences, with the latter noting the vehicle's versatility and durability, even with high mileage, while another potential buyer, @ezxh2, acknowledges the truck's condition and shares excitement about its low mileage.
Neutral: Several comments provide general information about the truck's features and history. @newcarpro provided detailed specifications and warranty information, while @BillyJasper inquired about the Montana titling practice, indicating a common concern among buyers. Additionally, @TSR90210 and @MPETESS10 asked specific questions regarding the door codes and the wheels, respectively. @Kcsauto222 promptly responded to inquiries, showcasing their willingness to engage with potential buyers and provide further details.
Negative: Concerns were raised by potential buyers regarding the vehicle's accident history, particularly whether the minor accidents listed on the Carfax report were truly insignificant. @posetong specifically asked for clarity on the extent of the previous damage, expressing uncertainty about the report's implications. Despite @Kcsauto222's assurance that only minor bumper damage occurred without frame involvement, questions about the rear end's condition and the possibility of rust were noted by @posetong, suggesting that potential buyers may still hold reservations about the vehicle's overall integrity.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and build quality, highlighting its beautiful color combination of capri blue exterior with a light interior. Comments from @no.radar and @gscharnagl recognize the impressive build list and the low mileage, while also noting the practicality of features like the tow hitch. @jburns3 appreciates its robust design, sharing experiences with similar models and suggesting that with the right winter tires, it could be an exceptional family vehicle.
Neutral: Several questions regarding the vehicle’s condition and history indicate a focus on its maintenance and current state. @MRHFIX inquires about the completion of a safety recall, while @medic327 and @Kbikeman ask about potential leaks and the condition of air shocks, showing a keen interest in detailed specifications. @Taipan49 seeks confirmation about the vehicle's location and scheduling a visit, showcasing interest but no strong opinions about the vehicle's appeal.
Negative: There are some concerns raised about the vehicle, primarily revolving around maintenance and potential issues over time. @medic327 and @Kbikeman express caution regarding the air shocks and possible leaks, suggesting a wariness about the vehicle's age and reliability despite its low mileage. However, @genevamotorcars (The Seller) addresses these concerns by providing assurances about the condition and history of the vehicle, citing previous inspections and the absence of leaks.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @mo8ius notes that the V8 model of this vehicle is rare to find without leather seats, indicating the original models were quite luxurious. @SUVs4eva, a current owner of a similar truck, expresses satisfaction with the vehicle, praising its power and comfort. @Vintage4x4Collector describes the truck as beautiful and lauds it for combining modern power with simplicity, highlighting its off-road capability and comfort on highways, wishing good luck with the auction.
Neutral: @newcarpro provides detailed specifications of the vehicle, including its VIN and delivery information, stating that there are no service contracts or branded titles, and confirming it has passed inspection. @72chevyguy (The Seller) answers a query from @Rufioboy regarding the size of the truck and states it measures about 12.5 feet, making it suitable for limited garage space. He also reassures @Sherwood010 that he will smog the truck for California buyers and explains the reason for selling is due to acquiring a company vehicle.
Negative: @WIZZZZ expresses concern regarding the vehicle's fuel capability, questioning its flex-fuel designation based on conflicting information from the emissions sticker and showing reluctance to trust the carfax. @Sherwood010 raises an additional issue about a diagnostic trouble code for the TPMS light, prompting @72chevyguy (The Seller) to acknowledge it has been diagnosed but has not been repaired due to a dead battery in the system's sensors.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CDehne mentioned that the buggy is nice and praised Berrien for making quality bodies at reasonable costs, indicating a favorable view of the vehicle's build quality. Additionally, @adam_weaver1981 provided detailed information that adds to the vehicle's appeal, such as its interstate driving capability, where it runs at a comfortable RPM while reaching highway speeds.
Neutral: @WLACA inquired about the manufacturer of the body, showing interest in the vehicle's origins without expressing a strong opinion. Their follow-up thank you suggests a neutral stance, appreciating the information without further comments. @GarageProducts asked if the buggy is street legal in Pennsylvania, which indicates a desire for clarification rather than an assessment of the vehicle's merits or flaws.
Negative: @Robson425 noted that the vehicle is too far away, which implies a limitation for potential buyers but does not directly speak to the quality or desirability of the buggy. This comment may deter interest from those outside the area and highlights geographical constraints. There are no strong negative comments regarding the vehicle's performance or features, but the logistical challenge mentioned could impact perceptions.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express a lot of enthusiasm and admiration for the Euro 1992 Mercedes-Benz 190E 1.8 Avantgarde Rosso. @mccand appreciates the unique 'Arcade' cloth interior, calling it "RAD!" while @cpa713 finds the term "Avantgarde" perfectly sums up the character of the car. @Rhodester fondly recalls their past experiences with Mercedes models, further emphasizing the positive feelings associated with owning such a classic. Commenters also note the car's excellent condition, with @UncleFred1 and @boaboyoz highlighting the appealing color combination and interior fabric quality. @1600veloce, the seller, is praised for their thorough approach, detailing the vehicle in an engaging manner.
Neutral: Comments also reflect a genuine curiosity regarding the car's specifications and features. @KKixar suggests a potential performance upgrade through an engine swap, while @W201Owner points out the rarity of the Avantgarde variant. Many commenters share technical details about the vehicle's engine and performance, with @Rotors discussing the different M102 engine types and their ratings. @Josedluca and @PricklyPearAutoClub both inquire about the air conditioning, highlighting a common concern for buyers of European cars without this feature. The community seems engaged with the technical aspects while also appreciating the vintage character of the vehicle.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, there are some criticisms regarding specific aspects of the car. @PricklyPearAutoClub mentions a concern about a possible exhaust leak due to the rusting catalytic converter, although this is later clarified by @1600veloce as just the heat shield. Some commenters express reluctance towards modifying such a unique model, with @W201Owner firmly stating that modifications should be reserved for vehicles that are more common. Feedback suggests a universal appreciation for maintaining the car's original state, indicating that any alterations might detract from its value and historical significance.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Monkeybutt appreciates the vehicle's appearance, expressing a desire to own it if circumstances allowed. @GLWA,De3de8 complements the truck's aesthetic, specifically highlighting the appearance of the 'C6 Gumby'. @boaboyoz exuberantly declares the Chevy pickup as 'gold' and 'very cool', while @Telos777 finds it to be a suitable vehicle for casual driving, praising its overall build quality.
Neutral: @toorich2, the seller, provides clarity about various features of the truck, such as the button on the center console which functions as an emergency brake. They mention the horsepower rating at approximately 670 hp and discuss the vehicle's dual fuel filters located on the frame rail. The seller also addresses inquiries regarding the vehicle's brake system and donor parts.
Negative: Several comments raise concerns about specific components of the truck. @gordon906 questions the purpose of a button in the center console, while @DanielWebber asks about the location of the gas filter. @Transam121 expresses concerns about the condition of the brake system, noting that the master cylinder and brake fluid appear worn despite minimal mileage. @toorich2 responds by explaining the low mileage of the donor parts and dismisses the concerns about the brake system, attributing any visible wear to the materials used.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters appreciated the vehicle's upgrades and overall appearance. @ngsd101 highlighted the attractive grill, stripes, and wheels, expressing hopes for the vehicle's success at auction. @boaboyoz described the Bronco as a lovely sight with its striking red and white color, complimenting the beautiful build. @Moparguitar expressed admiration with a 'WOW', mentioning a small personal touch they might add by flipping the white letters on the tires to the outside, showing overall positive vibes toward the design.
Neutral: Several commenters asked questions about the vehicle, indicating a balanced interest. @Emmettbuilt inquired about the availability of videos showcasing the vehicle in action, which @Bennyz, the seller, responded to positively by sharing that videos were added and encouraging a test drive. @RoadRat2020 requested restoration photos and sought clarification about modifying the bumpers, implying a desire for more information before considering a purchase. This shows that while they were impressed, they were looking for further details.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments regarding the vehicle. However, @RoadRat2020's inquiry about the bumpers might suggest potential concerns about modifications, reflecting a cautious perspective. The absence of negative feedback indicates that overall perceptions of the Bronco are favorable, with comments leaning more towards curiosity and admiration rather than criticism.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @4WHEEL_GERMAN has assured potential buyers that the car will be smogged prior to pick up or delivery, addressing @wagonboytd's concern about its emissions status. The engine is described as smooth and quiet, with no signs of failure or unusual noises, which may reassure buyers regarding its mechanical condition.
Neutral: In response to inquiries regarding the vehicle's maintenance and appearance, @4WHEEL_GERMAN acknowledged the haziness of the headlights, attributing it to sun exposure and confirming that the timing chain and tensioners have no documented service history. However, the seller noted that the engine sounds normal during operation, which might encourage some buyers to consider the vehicle despite the lack of service records.
Negative: Several commenters expressed concerns about crucial maintenance aspects of the vehicle. @ripper996 pointed to the headlights' scratched condition, while @nld1966 and @riosr specifically asked about the status of the timing chain and tensioners, indicating potential issues that have not been addressed. Additionally, @wagonboytd raised the question of the emissions status since it had not passed recently, suggesting that there may be underlying issues contributing to the sale of the vehicle.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Collectibleclassics emphasizes the standout features of the 2006 Porsche 911 Carrera S Cabriolet, highlighting its phenomenal paint condition, strong service history, and the impressive list of options such as Hardback Sport Seats and Sport Chrono Plus. The seller expresses confidence in the car's incredible drive, smooth clutch and shifts, and the top operating flawlessly. The transparency in providing extensive documentation, including multiple detailed videos and photos for potential buyers, showcases the seller's commitment to smooth transactions and customer satisfaction.
Neutral: Commenters like @Stevehatfield and @daviduccio discuss the unique red 'S' on the vehicle, noting its visual appeal and personal touch from previous owners. While some see it as an interesting modification that adds flair, others point out that it is not an OEM feature. Additionally, @boaboyoz praises the car’s Seal Gray Metallic color and expresses encouragement for the auction, adding a touch of community spirit among enthusiasts.
Negative: A few concerns are raised by commenters such as @Randolpho, who inquires about the IMS bearing replacement, which is a common point of scrutiny for this vehicle type. The seller clarifies that this model features a non-serviceable IMS and that replacements are rare. Furthermore, @JRG1985 points out a potential issue with a visible crack in the passenger side glass from a walk-around video, highlighting the car's imperfections in an otherwise meticulous listing.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @bmchan praised the vehicle, calling it a great looking option. @H2R expressed excitement about the vehicle's front wheel drive and performance upgrades, also mentioning that it's Vanderhall's final year for Blackjacks, suggesting that it is a worthwhile investment. @buybid22, the seller, confirmed that the vehicle is in really nice shape and has been well cared for, having recently undergone service at Naples Motorsports, where the shift module was replaced.
Neutral: @RandyRitzow raised a question about the vehicle's registration as a motorcycle, inquiring if that means a motorcycle license is needed, while @andy.harper asked about the vehicle's suitability for taller individuals, specifically if someone at 6'5" could fit comfortably. @H2R provided feedback that a 6'4" reviewer found the legroom sufficient, while also discussing motorcycle licensing requirements for three-wheelers and asking the seller about the vehicle's ownership and maintenance history.
Negative: @lpbltr noted a lack of cruise control switches in the vehicle, questioning if it was equipped with that feature. @H2R raised a concern about the absence of the original owners manual and the unknown maintenance history since only the title and keys were provided after the vehicle was traded in from the original owner to a Ferrari dealer. It was mentioned by @H2R that there seems to be a lack of interest and bids on the auction with only one day left.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @harryclark presents a lovely 1966 Porsche 912 Coupe that's well maintained and has proven reliable over the past 12 years. The car is described as having surprising power that runs and drives very well, with performance comparable to a 911. Additionally, @56PackardMan highlights that a well-tuned 912 can keep up with early 911s, mentioning the car's lighter weight and better fuel efficiency, which further emphasizes its appeal.
Neutral: @Rye356b comments on some minor details like the tan dash and the mounting of the coil, acknowledging that although these are concerns, they are relatively minor compared to the car's overall beauty. @harryclark notes the car is a driver quality vehicle with serviceable paint and chrome, suitable for use as a classic daily driver or for customization. @flightning1 appreciates the unique features of the 912, indicating that these characteristics might have their own charm.
Negative: @Yellowboatscars inquires about the car's service history, specifically regarding the suspension, which indicates some uncertainties regarding its condition. @marovellil points out that the numerals for the model year and badging are incorrect, raising concerns about authenticity. Furthermore, @goodwork mentions that the current seats aren't original, and @crj2 echoes that the dash color is not factory, suggesting that potential buyers should be cautious about these discrepancies.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @quattro4Snow remarked that the vehicle is practically brand new and beautiful, expressing admiration for its appearance. @genevamotorcars (The Seller) also provided reassurance regarding the vehicle's condition and features, confirming that the tires are new Michelin tires, while indicating that the HSE trim is well-equipped. Another positive note was from @Funecodrive, who acknowledged the vehicle's appeal but sought further clarification on its options, indicating an interest in the vehicle's potential without suggesting it was lacking in value.
Neutral: @samlamb102 asked clarifying questions regarding specific features such as cooling seats, the number of keys, window tint, and massaging seats, highlighting the interest in both the vehicle's condition and its functionality. @Iowacadence inquired about the difficulty of installing a trailer hitch and wiring, which reflects a practical concern rather than an opinion about the vehicle itself. The conversation around these features suggests that while the vehicle is perceived positively, potential buyers are looking for specific details to ensure it meets their needs.
Negative: @Funecodrive expressed skepticism about the vehicle's trim level, arguing that without a comprehensive window sticker or demonstration of additional features, it could be viewed as just a base model rather than an HSE fully equipped with options. This concern indicates a hesitation in the interest due to the lack of detailed information, which could detract from the vehicle's perceived value and buyer confidence. Overall, while many comments are favorable, the lack of clarity on certain features has raised doubts about whether the vehicle's capabilities justify its expected value.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Beans_Bacon describes the vehicle as beautiful, capturing the admiration many have for it. @f4windex highlights its awesomeness, aligning with @Fury68's view that it exceeds expectations for a truck of its age. @jacksd3 shares a nostalgic sentiment from owning a similar model, praising its reliability and ease of maintenance. @CKKurtz believes it's the coolest vehicle of the listings, while @quattro_v1.0 reminisces fondly about experiences with similar trucks, emphasizing the emotional connection many feel toward such vehicles.
Neutral: The seller(@JLLL) provides details about the vehicle, confirming a lack of air conditioning, which several commenters inquire about, including @kcatx and @neddyo292 who ask functional questions about the truck’s 4WD, fuel tank, and gauge. The seller also notes the truck's recent servicing and clarifies that while it's suitable for highway speeds, it may not feel stable at higher velocities due to oversized tires. Parts of the truck's body have minor imperfections, which were pointed out in the photos provided.
Negative: Despite the positive impressions, concerns arise regarding the vehicle’s condition, particularly from @Ajj62 who wishes for a better view of the doors and queries previous alterations, while @Bumsteer73 also seeks assurance about the body’s straightness and highway performance. For potential buyers, the absence of A/C and limitations on speed could be drawbacks, as seen in comments questioning the feasibility of adding air conditioning (@neddyo292) and the general highway capabilities.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Responses regarding the vehicle highlight its appealing attributes and enhancements. The seller emphasizes the thoughtful modifications made to the 996 Carrera 4 Cabriolet, such as improved cooling with a third radiator, upgraded HID lights for better visibility at night, and a Fabspeed exhaust that adds a deeper sound without being overly loud. Commenters like @Stephenh27 express admiration, noting the car's classic color combination, low mileage, and evident care it has received, suggesting it’s a well-cared-for vehicle that delivers a solid driving experience.
Neutral: There are inquiries about specific features and maintenance history, indicating an engaged community seeking clarity on the vehicle's condition. @claudecastro and @lawnboy911 ask about the third radiator's function and the rear spoiler's operation, respectively. @jsviking requests detailed images of the IMS retrofit kit's installation and raises a concern regarding the history of maintenance records. The seller responds to these queries with information and reassurances, demonstrating a commitment to transparency about the car's upgrades and maintenance.
Negative: Some comments express caution and highlight concerns about the vehicle's history. @jsviking points out that the maintenance records show no work done by the listed shop in the last year, which raises doubts about the vehicle's servicing. Similarly, concerns are raised about a stain on the rear seat by @lawnboy911, and there is a request for more information regarding an accident associated with the Carfax report. These points indicate potential issues that prospective buyers may want to explore further before making a decision.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the 1998 Toyota Land Cruiser for its excellent condition and rarity. @bcrichards called it "very cool", while @Majornelson expressed excitement by saying, "Wow!!!!!!! This one is amazing!" @Espanolie noted its great appearance and uncommon features, saying it would do quite well in the market. The seller, @TheMDNTcollection, highlighted the vehicle's unique aspects, including its original low mileage and a variety of distinctive features not typically available in the US. Other users like @troopy1215 emphasized its cleanliness and overall appeal, wishing it finds a good home. Many expressed admiration and nostalgia for the model, with @MideastClassicsLLC reminiscing about the original 100 series launch, reaffirming the Land Cruiser's status as a collectible vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments included general inquiries and assessments regarding the vehicle's specifications and condition. @Elias99 asked whether the paint was original, and @ManyTrailers inquired about tire date codes and service records, indicating a thorough interest in the vehicle's upkeep. @jburch107 raised a question about registration challenges in California, highlighting the complexities of owning such a vehicle in strict regulatory environments. Meanwhile, @CDM4 wanted confirmation about the absence of tobacco smell, showing concern for the vehicle's interior condition. @GDMCHRIZ asked if it required regular or premium fuel, suggesting a focus on operational costs and usability.
Negative: Some comments expressed apprehensions about the vehicle's maintenance and regulatory issues. @jburch107 pointed out the difficulties of registering such a vehicle in California due to costly certification requirements. @kamazda questioned the potential maintenance headaches associated with owning a non-US market vehicle, suggesting concerns about parts availability and repair support. Additionally, @Freestone's question about the factory spare tire carrier installation emphasized considerations about modifications and convenience, hinting at potential doubts about practicality. @Elias99 also requested further evidence with paint tests, indicating some skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition claims.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its aesthetic appeal, emphasizing its color combination and overall condition. @mick59 described it as a 'very tidy Beetle' with a 'sweet' engine, while @Jr.68 noted the 'really nice Bug' and expressed pride in having owned a similar model. @Finatic and @RAMS57 also appreciated the car's beauty, with comments highlighting classy touches and quality work. The seller, @MattJG, received compliments for the craftsmanship of the vehicle and promised additional photos and videos to showcase features like the battery compartment and a cold start.
Neutral: The discussions included questions about specific details of the car's condition. @Ethibault1 raised concerns about stains on the carpets and headliner, showing an understanding of the beauty of the vehicle while needing clarification on minor issues. @MDH47 and other commenters, including @Chrispc and @Rumbling, provided insights into potential maintenance needs and the car's historical integrity, discussing the need for repairs related to the sunroof and gauges. @MattJG responded with information about the current state of the vehicle, noting that while there are some issues, they can potentially be resolved, which illustrates ongoing communication between the seller and potential buyers.
Negative: Several comments pointed out concerning aspects of the car, particularly regarding earlier damage. @Jlamon7070 and @Jbadial both mentioned visible wrinkles and repair work on the front end, leading to speculation about prior accidents. @AvionicsTech criticized the wiring behind the dash as being messy and potentially indicative of electrical issues, while @MattJG rebuffed some of these negative assertions, clarifying the true state of the car. This back-and-forth highlighted tension around the car's history and the reliability of information being shared.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Rimrider appreciates the standard size cab of the vehicle, noting its spacious design, while @MTXprez mentions that they own a matching Viper car, which adds a unique selling point for potential buyers interested in a set. @MAX413 expresses excitement about the 2004 Dodge RAM SRT-10's performance, highlighting its impressive speed capabilities and stating that it's an enjoyable ride. Furthermore, @MTXaudio (The Seller) assures that the truck has been well maintained in a climate-controlled environment, which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the truck's low mileage and history, with @De3de8 showcasing their personalized tag and expressing pride in their ownership. @Jtsbrs inquires about the age of the tires, and @cwalker985 expresses curiosity about the market value of this unique vehicle. The conversation among various users suggests an interest in the potential value of such a classic model, while @MTXaudio (The Seller) provides details from maintenance history, confirming regular upkeep despite low usage.
Negative: On the downside, concerns have been raised about the vehicle's long duration without an oil change, as noted by @Royce59, which raises questions about potential engine problems. @cwalker985 also comments on unusual oxidation spots visible in the underbody photographs, suggesting it might not be typical for such low mileage and indicating possible neglect. Moreover, @stevenanastos asks the seller about the condition of the paint, indicating some uncertainty from potential buyers about the vehicle's cosmetic condition despite the overall positive comments from other users.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Hoppy18 complimented the vehicle, referring to it as a nice rig and expressing respect for the seller on BaT (Bring a Trailer). The comment reflects confidence in the seller's credibility and showcases a positive impression of the G63 for potential buyers. Overall, this feedback suggests that the vehicle is appealing and that the selling platform is considered reputable.
Neutral: @silverarrowcarsltd (The Seller) clarified several points regarding the G63, affirming it as a US delivered 2013 model with just 850 miles and confirming its 50 state smog compliance. They also addressed misconceptions regarding its price and previous comments about accident history, stating that it has never been in an accident but had a minor scuffed bumper repair done in 2019. Furthermore, they provided information on the vehicle’s location, suggesting would-be buyers contact them for an in-person viewing.
Negative: @rossgivens' comment was flagged as non-constructive, suggesting that there may be negative perceptions or misinformation present in the discussion about the G63. Additionally, @land_shark3 raised concerns about the brakes being replaced at relatively low mileage, questioning whether this was normal for the vehicle. These remarks highlight potential worries about reliability and maintenance that some users may have about the G-Wagon.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Johnnymopar expresses enthusiasm for this truck as he considers it almost perfect and has previously owned multiple models, highlighting its reliability and ease of maintenance. @kevin5571 (The Seller) supports this view, emphasizing how well GM has made these trucks, stating they are the most reliable and comfortable in his opinion. @kevin5571 (The Seller) further confirms the truck operates exceptionally well, comparing it to a new vehicle from 1997.
Neutral: @Andygardner82 raises a valid point about unclear details regarding previous damage reported on the Carfax, showing some concern about the vehicle's history that potential buyers might share. @Chipper55 and @Matthew7 request additional images to assess the condition of the truck better, particularly underbody areas susceptible to rust and other damage. @GaryRat seeks clarity on the presence of 4-wheel drive functionality and its operational indicators, showing a need for better visual documentation in the listing.
Negative: @paydirt mentions concerns about potential dents and hail damage, illustrating the importance of detailed examination for prospective buyers. @Matthew7 echoes this sentiment by probing for photos of critical structural areas, suggesting apprehension about rust patterns, which could significantly affect value. @ADT64 interprets @GaryRat's inquiry as a sign of a lack of necessary photographic detail, indicating a possible overall deficiency in effective communication from the seller.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @dukey (The Seller) described the vehicle as a quick, nimble, and enjoyable little car that has been completely issue-free during his ownership. He highlighted its clean condition with under 40,000 miles and mentioned his responsiveness throughout the auction process, indicating a willingness to engage with potential bidders. Overall, his comments suggest a positive ownership experience, making it an attractive option for buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed the vehicle's color, with @mordecai providing technical details about the color designation being Sparkling Silver Metallic. @harveyherman expressed curiosity regarding the car's description in Carfax, noting it was frequently labeled as green. Additionally, @saabsnob pointed out the registration issue, questioning why the vehicle carries Montana plates while being located in New York, to which @kpcconifer clarified the common practice of registering vehicles in Montana for cost-saving purposes.
Negative: No significant negative comments were found about the vehicle in the discussion. However, some potential bidders, including @SOLO67, expressed concerns about high shipping costs to the West Coast, implying that locating the car in New York might be a logistical challenge. Furthermore, @rangoonred inquired about the presence of any oil leaks, suggesting a lingering concern about the car's condition despite the seller's assurances.
|
454-Powered 1966 Chevrolet Chevelle SS 396 Sport Coupe 4-Speed
138176A186585
Lot 198068
Private Party
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight a nostalgic appreciation for the 1966 Chevy Chevelle SS, with users like @redboots reminiscing about their own experiences with similar cars. @V8_LVR expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, calling it a "really sweet lookin' '66" and showing gratitude for the seller's ownership. @Rasseattle, the seller, engaged positively with potential buyers, expressing gratitude for interest and offering to answer questions, which adds a personal touch to the sale experience.
Neutral: Several commenters raised clarifying questions about the car's specifications and condition, such as @HIGHSIERRA57 correcting the wheel size and @ironking inquiring about the functionality of the gauges. @Kocianrob and @WIZZZZ sought details about the engine's origin and the nature of the frame repairs, indicating a cautious interest in the vehicle's history and condition, while @Rasseattle provided reasonable answers to these inquiries without giving definitive reassurances about specifics.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the car's condition, including @Kocianrob questioning whether the engine had been rebuilt and whether the frame repair was due to significant rust, showing skepticism about the quality of past restorations. Similarly, @V8_LVR noted the absence of a fan shroud, leading to questions about potential overheating, which indicates uncertainty about reliability. Additionally, the seller admitted to a lack of detailed knowledge regarding previous repairs, which could raise flags for prospective buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @zarcherinok expressed excitement about the unique style of the Vespa, highlighting its distinctive customization. @MAmft pointed out its potential as a fashion accessory, suggesting it be paired with matching items like a helmet, referencing a popular show. @GDogg noted its cool factor, reminiscing about its absence from the dealership during their Vespa purchase and praising @silverarrowcarsltd for its impressive shine.
Neutral: @KSJ1865 contributed to the discussion by sharing the Vespa’s auction history, mentioning a previous sale for $78,000, alongside details about its rarity with only 946 units produced. @AbnMike acknowledged it as a collectible item, clarifying their preference for older scooters. Other comments focused on factual inquiries regarding the scooter's specifications and license requirements, showing a mix of curiosity and concern about practicality.
Negative: @Collins4A humorously questioned social acceptance at a motorcycle rally, while @eyadegar raised practical licensing concerns regarding the scooter's displacement. @pclarke10 sought clarification about what accessories were included with the sale and expressed disappointment when @silverarrowcarsltd confirmed that the helmet was not part of the sale. Additionally, @PhilNiekro and @Starservice critiqued the claims about its rarity, with @PhilNiekro pointing out the contradictory nature of being one of only 946 produced, while @Starservice doubted the accuracy of production figures.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments shine a light on the impressive performance and sound of the vehicle, with @Typhoontaz mentioning that the engine sounds great and is fun to drive. @kevinstoys (The Seller) acknowledges that many Corvette owners tend to be meticulous, emphasizing that despite being the fifth owner, he has put about 15K miles on it while maintaining its condition, reinforcing the idea that it was well taken care of by previous owners. @MartyKC supports this sentiment, noting that Corvette owners typically care for their cars, suggesting that the car is likely in good shape due to its upkeep.
Neutral: There is a notable amount of curiosity regarding the vehicle's ownership history, with @samireabd expressing concern about seeing five owners on the Carfax report. However, @MartyKC offers reassurance that it's common in Corvette ownership, and that potential buyers should conduct a Pre-Purchase Inspection (PPI) if they have concerns. The dialogue between potential buyers and the seller showcases an openness to communication and transparency about the vehicle's condition and history.
Negative: Some apprehensions arise regarding the vehicle's past ownership, with @samireabd pointing out the potential red flags associated with multiple previous owners. This sentiment is echoed by @MartyKC who acknowledges that while multiple owners can be concerning, the overall condition and maintenance history of the car are critical factors that can alleviate such worries. Additionally, @CaptJack22's inquiry about viewing the car suggests that there is an eagerness to verify its condition firsthand, which could indicate skepticism among buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @5KLegacy (The Seller) expressed excitement about the auction and encouraged potential buyers to ask questions, indicating a positive engagement with the community. Commenter @Skerzz highlighted the superiority of the 2025 Raptor R compared to previous models, praising its power and distinctive V8 engine sounds. This sentiment is echoed in @5KLegacy's comments about the truck's selectable exhaust modes, emphasizing the versatility and appealing sound characteristics of the vehicle, which can vary from quiet to aggressive tones depending on the setting chosen.
Neutral: Commenter @vtec4ever asked for comparisons between the standard Raptor and the R model, seeking clarity on the differences in engines and trims. @Travisg208 inquired about bidding fees and acceptable payment methods, showing a keen interest in the auction process while not commenting directly on the truck itself. @bimmere39m5 replied with informative details about the payment methods, providing clarity for potential bidders about fees associated with the transaction.
Negative: @Skerzz asked the seller why they are selling the truck, which introduces a concern about the motivations behind the sale. However, comments did not expand further on negative experiences or criticisms about the vehicle, focusing mostly on facilitating an understanding of its features and value. There were no outright negative reviews about the truck itself, showing a general consensus of interest and appreciation among the bidders.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters are impressed with the vehicle's unique features, such as the Porsche branded cloth seat upholstery, which many find appealing and rare. @motts911targa described the car as 'a beauty' and expressed regret for not being able to consider it due to garage space. @jbh30319 also shared his admiration for the cloth seats, while @wadds71 appreciated the contrasting interior color and the overall condition of the Porsche. The seller, @Mr.NewYork, actively engages with interested buyers, answering questions and offering insights about the car's specs and history, further enhancing the positive sentiment surrounding the listing.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarifications on specific features of the car, indicating a balance of curiosity and caution toward its overall condition. @Halvo and @jbh30319 discussed the wheels, with some preferring different sizes for a better look. @almas raised a query about the repainting of the passenger side door, while others like @Midmich60 requested additional information such as paint meter readings to assess the vehicle's condition. These neutral interactions show a reasonable level of interest but also a practical approach to potential concerns with the car.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding the car's condition, particularly the mention of 'crazing' in the paint as highlighted by @wadds71, who described small strange lines on various parts of the vehicle. @Caymanorcarrera pointed to the evidence of harsh climate effects on the car, describing the window tint as an eyesore and suggesting that the vehicle might require a thorough restoration. Additionally, @jroberts7290 expressed a desire for more details on the paint work and a possible repaint due to the paint condition discussions, indicating a level of skepticism about the car's readiness for sale. These negative aspects suggest caution among potential buyers about the car's overall value and performance.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments express admiration for the 1953 BSA 650cc Super Flash, highlighting its impeccable restoration and unique historical significance as the first one off the production line. @DaveD notes the remarkable transformation from its previous condition, while @Halcyonmotors praises the overall aesthetics, suggesting it deserves recognition for its outstanding restoration. @Gio1966, who purchased the bike, shares that he was pleased with the restoration process and the outcome, affirming that the bike rides well and started easily with good brakes and functioning gears.
Neutral: Commenters discuss specific technical details about the bike and its restoration. @Halcyonmotors shares a preference for different lighting conditions in photographs, offering different perspectives on how the bike looks in natural light. Additionally, @Warren wonders about the authenticity of certain components like the silencers, indicating a nuanced knowledge among the community regarding the specific features of the Super Flash models, while @eeservices and @Gio1966 compare their experiences with similar bikes.
Negative: Some comments raise minor concerns about details of the motorcycle. @Halcyonmotors mentions the presence of a late '60s side stand which doesn't fit the bike's era, and @DaveD points out an oversight in the photography regarding the center stand not being utilized in the display. @TheImageEngine reflects on the difficulty some riders have with center stands, while @BritTwit shares the challenges of sourcing original parts, suggesting that the community observes and critiques these finer points closely despite the overall positive reception of the bike.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @DasLilBeast appreciates the quality of Intermeccanica vehicles but expresses concern over the particular brown color choice. @Justification points out that the brown hue has nostalgic ties to a character from a surf movie, suggesting a positive association with it. @Charleetuner emphasizes that the imperfections add to the vehicle's charm, recalling fond memories associated with a similar color from the past. @KSP0938 expresses love for the brown, claiming that only a Porsche could pull it off, reflecting a sense of pride in the vehicle's unique color.
Neutral: @moonbeam996GT3 shares a mixed view, noting his own dislike for the brown color but acknowledging the quality of the car's construction and features like the adequate engine and IRS rear axle. @nickgo agrees that the color is not ideal but criticizes the mismatched steering wheel color, suggesting an easy fix. @gonetothebeach notes the vehicle's notable features like the independent suspension and decent motor while expressing a fondness for the brown color, indicating a personal preference that may be shared by some potential buyers.
Negative: @glshoemaker asserts that brown is one of the least desirable car colors, predicting challenges in finding the right buyer. @hotrodstitcher reminds commenters that earlier Intermeccanica cars were built with OEM Porsche parts but seems to tacitly agree that the aesthetic choice of brown is debatable. @Wildbunch inquires about oil leakage, hinting at potential maintenance concerns, while @ErikG criticizes the seller's lack of communication regarding essential vehicle documentation, raising more doubts about the vehicle's quality and condition.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive condition and aesthetic appeal. @beans_bacon describes the truck as 'very sweet', while @boaboyoz praises it as an 'admirable Admiral Blue R10 pickup' and a 'delightful build'. The seller, @kdcars, responds positively to these remarks, emphasizing the truck's excellent paint quality and rust-free sheet metal, as it has been well-maintained as a southern truck. Furthermore, @kdcars notes that the truck is ready for immediate enjoyment or could serve as a solid platform for upgrades.
Neutral: There are several neutral inquiries about the vehicle, particularly regarding its features and auction process. @AntMan1980 raises questions about the reserve price and engine mileage, while @budlight12 simply asks if the air conditioning is cold. @kdcars addresses these queries by explaining the auction's bidding process, confirming that the AC is indeed cold, and providing insights into the vehicle's mileage and condition. The discussion around the center seat and wipers also indicates a desire for clarity about the vehicle's specifics.
Negative: Some comments indicate confusion or concern about aspects of the vehicle. @knucklehead47 questions the status of the windshield equipment, pointing out a contradiction in the listing regarding the wipers. @AntMan1980 expresses a desire for more detailed information about the engine's mileage and transmission, implying a lack of transparency that could raise concerns for potential buyers. The seller, @kdcars, does work to clarify these points, but the initial confusion reflects a need for clearer communication in the vehicle's listing.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Overall, the comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and performance. @Vintage_steel praised both the car's color and the skills of the photographer, calling them a 'PRO' for their excellent presentation. Several users noted the quality of the driving videos shared by @911r, with @Typhoontaz complimenting the smoothness of the footage and inquiring about the camera equipment used—evidence that the vehicle is well-represented visually. @ilikecars2 mentioned that the car is 'well sorted' and expressed confidence that the next owner will derive joy from driving and showing it off at events.
Neutral: The discussions also covered technical aspects and the history of the car. @spgspg, the original owner's child, shared valuable background information about the car's ownership and modifications over the years, indicating that the vehicle has a significant personal history. Some participants like @Stockdoctor and @austinhealer sought clarification on specifics regarding the engine, highlighting their interest in understanding the vehicle's performance characteristics. This neutral tone indicates a level of seriousness among potential buyers concerning the car's authenticity and specifications, showing they value accurate information before making bidding decisions.
Negative: Conversely, some comments raised concerns about potential issues with the car. @Sunbeamdon pointed out the alignment of the bumpers, describing them as 'twisted down' and suggesting that fixing this would require effort, indicating a minor flaw in the vehicle's appearance. @austinhealer and @mikewood discussed the implications of the vehicle having a non-matching engine, suggesting that while the 302 engine could perform well, its presence may be a detriment to purists concerned about originality. Additionally, the comment by @oldcanuck inquiring whether the car runs cool in hot conditions reveals anxieties regarding engine performance, especially given its previous overheating susceptibility.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express positive sentiments about the 2003 Thunderbird, particularly noting its flawless condition and low mileage. @lancastercarco (The Seller) highlighted that the car appears immaculate with no visible marks, and it has been well-maintained, stored properly, and driven only 700 miles over five years by the previous owner. The included accessories like the manual, hard top stand, and car cover were also appreciated, emphasizing the vehicle's exceptional care. @stugottz shared their affection for the 007 edition, enhancing the vehicle's allure through its unique design and status.
Neutral: A few comments reflect a neutral view, focusing more on technical aspects and observations rather than emotional responses. @berfinroy pointed out that low mileage examples of these retro-designed Thunderbirds are common, distinguishing them from regular use vehicles. Others like @mwetdoc0403 expressed interest in a thorough mechanical inspection by Ford, which was already addressed by @lancastercarco (The Seller), confirming no issues found during a recent check. The ongoing discussion also included the notable starting sale mileage of '007', which several found amusing and a clever marketing touch.
Negative: No significant negative comments were found regarding the vehicle. @mwetdoc0403's suggestion for a comprehensive inspection may hint at general concerns about potential long-term issues with classic cars, indicating a cautious approach that some prospective buyers may share. However, this sentiment was addressed positively by the seller, who provided assurance of the car's excellent condition. Overall, the comments reflect a strong inclination towards admiration and excitement for the Thunderbird, with little to no adverse feedback.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments about the vehicle consistently highlight its stunning appearance and overall condition. @Schookway noted that the car looks beautiful despite having 70,000 miles, while @DaveInTahoe expressed admiration for the color scheme and luxurious details. @mrBCut described the car as "perfection," and @LaserGuru1948 showed appreciation for its great specifications, emphasizing the vehicle's appeal. The seller, @howS, acknowledged the enthusiasm for the car and promised to provide updates and additional information as the auction progresses.
Neutral: Several comments focused on inquiries regarding specific aspects of the vehicle, reflecting a desire for more transparency and assurance about its condition. @sisiay requested more details on the reported damage, while @bwv asked about the maintenance history, particularly relating to the coolant pipes, which are a common concern among owners of the 996/997 Turbo models. @Kooshi3 and @elijahcole92 questioned the details about the DME overrev report and other vehicle modifications, indicating that potential buyers are looking for more concrete information before making decisions.
Negative: Conversely, some comments raised skepticism regarding issues with the car. @sunkingm3 pointed out potential misalignments and paintwork irregularities, and @ripper996 highlighted concerns about common coolant pipe failures. @dhalperin13 inquired about the presence of noises or rattles, suggesting that such issues are often common in these models. The exchange highlighted a mix of speculation and concern about the car's history and any previous damage, as @howS, the seller, worked to clarify and address these points while trying to mitigate any baseless speculation.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Nailhead1945 expressed admiration for the beauty of the ’40 Ford sedan, indicating a strong appreciation for classic cars. @mike_rockwell highlighted that this model is ideal for families due to its spaciousness compared to coupes. Many commenters, including @Jeffsnapp and @LutzMultimediaLLC, praised the overall aesthetics and comfort of the vehicle, suggesting it’s an excellent choice for anyone looking to enjoy a classic with modern comforts like Vintage AC. Overall, the consensus appears to lean positively towards its appeal as a stylish and practical classic car.
Neutral: Multiple comments raised questions about the vehicle's specifications such as the age of the tires, gas mileage, and the presence of the VIN number stamped on the frame. @ddama1 and @Ricster were particularly curious about the tire condition and AC system. @Diamondt35 (The Seller) responded to these inquiries by providing reassurance about the condition of the tires and the functionality of the air conditioning system, indicating the seller is actively engaging in the discussion about the vehicle’s details. Comments like these reflect a common interest in understanding the technical aspects of the car without veering too negatively or positively.
Negative: Some remarks, such as those from @Mouse51, suggest potential areas for improvement, including a desire for the exhaust to have a more aggressive sound. Questions surrounding the non-original serial number tag brought up by @The_Art_Doctor indicate concerns by some users about authenticity. Additionally, @Randym1100 raised issues about the VIN number and its verification, reflecting a level of skepticism that may deter potential buyers who prioritize original specifications in classic cars. Overall, while the vehicle has many fans, there are concerns that could affect perceptions negatively.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @C3_AG praised the vehicle as a stunning example, while @boaboyoz described the 675LT Spider as a scintillating and exquisite car. @Wob (The Seller) noted how drivable the 675LT is, with its lively performance both on road and track, highlighted by its 15k miles, which is significantly lower than many others. The seller emphasized the car's great sound and look, making it enjoyable for cruising with the top down. @catdog2 also appreciated the beautiful design and impressive driving video of this Spider model, expressing love for his own coupe version.
Neutral: Several bidders sought additional information to make informed decisions. @Kingjester requested close-up photos of specific parts to assess the vehicle's condition better. @Bidder921 asked for details on service records, as well as clarifications regarding paint protection film and other specifications. @mk8ch and @catdog2 raised questions about the aftermarket options, further showcasing the collective desire for comprehensive details to evaluate the car's suitability for their needs. @Wob addressed these inquiries in detail, underscoring a commitment to transparency during the auction.
Negative: Some comments indicated concerns regarding the seller's responsiveness, with @catdog2 expressing disappointment over a lack of communication. @Kingjester voiced skepticism about the usual scuffing referenced by the seller, based on personal experience with low vehicles. Additionally, @catdog2 pointed out a potential issue with the exhaust tips being misaligned, asking for clarification on the cause and possible remedies. This feedback highlights some buyers' wariness regarding the car's condition and the seller's adequacy in addressing concerns.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @7257scottt compliments the 55 Thunderbird's beautiful restoration quality, suggesting that the restoration cost likely exceeds the purchase price, making it a great opportunity for potential buyers. @bondgraham shares a nostalgic connection to the car and appreciates its attractive color, calling it a decent specimen. @trailerjack also admires the vehicle's looks and envisions it cruising along the beach, while @deacon61, the seller, expresses pride in the car's ability to draw crowds and notes it has been well taken care of.
Neutral: @gocorcoran provides a critical analysis of the car's listing, pointing out discrepancies in the written description regarding its features. @Brett_T_Evans asks about the operational condition of the overdrive and the fender skirts, seeking clarification. This exchange indicates that while the car has many good traits, potential buyers are keen to get accurate information on certain details to make informed decisions.
Negative: Several users express concerns about misleading aspects of the listing. @gocorcoran highlights notable inaccuracies in the description, such as the claimed wheel specifications, which if misrepresented could impact the car's value significantly. @nexttime raises practical questions regarding the vehicle's functionality and readiness for long-distance cruising, bringing attention to potential unseen issues that may need addressing.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed enthusiasm about the car's general condition and history. @Leeroybrown (The Seller) highlighted that the vehicle is very clean both inside and out, and operates well, stating it 'runs like a top' after recent maintenance. An earlier owner, @ELROD, shared a nostalgic connection, reminiscing about a similar model he owned, which indicates the car's appeal to those familiar with classic vehicles. Additionally, the car's unique color change from blue to violet depending on sunlight was met with interest, indicating it is visually striking.
Neutral: There were several inquiries regarding the car's specifications and history, with @pt70 asking about its location after being redone in 2010 and @oklaoz inquiring about the transmission type. @TimSullivan posed a question about rust, to which @Leeroybrown (The Seller) clarified that there is only surface rust in some minor areas, assuring potential buyers of the overall quality. Comments also included suggestions for cosmetic improvements to enhance its appearance, showing a community engaged in the car's maintenance and presentation.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition. @TimSullivan questioned the extent of rust repairs and the quality of bodywork, while @dirk.dcw sought clarification on the claim of 'bad body work,' which @Leeroybrown (The Seller) later addressed by stating that there is actually 'NO bad body work.' Additionally, while @JT77 asked about horsepower, @Leeroybrown was unable to specify, which may leave some potential buyers wanting more detailed information.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiastic admiration for the vehicle, reminiscing about its classic appeal and personal associations. @JuanSuave97 calls it a "dream car," while @Aaron83616 sees it as a great starting point for a unique project. @ElDorado54 fondly remembers the car's potential for nostalgic outings, calling it perfect for cruising and enjoying movies at the drive-in. @K51020Ranch emphasizes the charitable aspect of the sale, hoping it helps veterans, while @porkpiehat and @wem5310 also commend the vehicle's sale for a worthy cause. @stugottz and @boaboyoz add to the praise, both admiring its aesthetic and the ethos behind the auction.
Neutral: Several commenters point out logistical concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and potential issues that could arise. @hr47cars notes the absence of a driving video, suggesting that a test drive could alleviate concerns about its roadworthiness. @Yourk9guy mentions that the car might have been stationary for a while but could be a good project if priced right. @bluesrocker asks specific questions about the car, such as whether it has drum brakes and the overall condition of the paint, indicating a cautious interest in the Impala. This shows a mix of excitement with the practicality required when purchasing a classic car.
Negative: Despite the positive sentiments, some comments reflect skepticism about the vehicle's state. @Number_Six recalls an earlier experience with a similar model that had significant body rot, pointing out the potential issues that could arise with this particular sale. @hr47cars expresses doubt about the driving experience, implying that without a proper driving video, bidders might be hesitant. @LeeCO755 directly questions the car's reliability for long trips, asking if it can make a 2,250-mile journey without repairs. @2J_Orthy raises concerns about possible rot on critical parts of the vehicle, highlighting the need for thorough inspection should someone plan to purchase it.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Tarek307 highlights the impressive condition of the 993 C2S, emphasizing its freshness, immaculate interior, and solid mechanical state. Commenters like @Zeldadog and @MaxTak laud the car's beauty and its stunning Arctic silver color, which accentuates its body lines. @Walid5211 calls it a gorgeous car and expresses excitement for the auction, while @MPM97turbo appreciates the car's old-school appeal and compliments the seller's presentation.
Neutral: Comments also reveal a few inquiries about the car's modifications and previous paintwork. @cpmbike raises concerns regarding the sound system, questioning whether any speakers were updated, and @pb_911 notes discrepancies in paint thickness, suggesting possible repainting of the quarter panels. @Tarek307 responds to these points, providing detailed explanations and assurance about the vehicle's condition based on comprehensive paint readings and past owner insights.
Negative: Some potential buyers express minor concerns about the vehicle's authenticity and aesthetics. @time00 mentions an overtly incorrect aspect that bothers them but reassures that it is an easy fix, while @jimmytheirishman questions the audio quality in one of the videos, which may impact the perceived professionalism of the listing. Overall, while there are minor criticisms, they do not overshadow the largely positive reception of the 993 C2S.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @newcarpro described the vehicle as "eye candy," while @theforce88 highlighted its beauty and wished good luck with the sale. @Accelo shared that the paint is outstanding and noted it as a great driver, pointing out its rust-free frame and matching engine, suggesting overall it has good fit and finish. @stugottz emphasized that Chevy got it right with the split window Vette in 1963, showing appreciation for its design.
Neutral: @Rosscoe (The Seller) responded to inquiries about aspects of the vehicle, confirming that the A/C is by Sanden SD5H14 and needs charging. He mentioned that the previous owner preferred a 3-speed over the original 2-speed Powerglide for better performance and cruising. He addressed questions about the A/C being R134A, its ducting, and the non-operational clock, providing factual responses without judgment.
Negative: @Accelo pointed out several issues with the car, mentioning that too many parts were unpainted or painted black, and listing concerns such as the driver's door pull coming apart and missing components like window washers. @Chase_2 raised a safety concern regarding the spinner orientation on the wheels, while @leterun speculated about the transmission's characteristics and suggested retaining the original. Overall, these comments reflect apprehensions about the vehicle's condition and modifications.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @overlandish praises the vehicle, expressing admiration for it as 'this little guy.' @dreamdog agrees, declaring it 'super cool' and emphasizes its practical uses, rather than just as a showpiece. They appreciate the vehicle's readiness for adventures and casual outings, like car meets and bumpy dates, highlighting its functional design and charm.
Neutral: @Timbz comments on the vehicle's interesting three-door short wheelbase design, expressing love for its color. However, they raise questions about the interior's color combination and whether it could have been swapped from another model, indicating a curiosity about its history. Additionally, @stanleyvanburen queries the accuracy of the color description, showing interest in details about the vehicle's appearance and potential ownership.
Negative: @mr.russky notes a concern regarding the vehicle's emissions compliance in California, citing that it hasn't passed those requirements, although they acknowledge the pre-1997 diesel exemption. They express frustration over the lack of timely response from the seller about an in-person viewing. Furthermore, @bbckfh comments on the vehicle's apparent need for repairs, suggesting it may require extensive work, which they frame as a fun challenge, but still reflects a significant concern about its condition.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight the vehicle's exceptional qualities and its impeccable condition, with @mynameistimo expressing excitement with a simple "Wwwwwooooooowwwww." @Premierautofl (The Seller) points out the car's one-owner history, rare 6-speed manual feature, and comprehensive documentation, assuring potential buyers of its reliability and pedigree. @FXRcR1 and @TJP_77 both comment positively on the car's stunning appearance, with @FXRcR1 describing it as a 'spectacular example' and @TJP_77 praising its overall aesthetics. Additionally, @BJSHAFER shares a personal connection, recalling their ownership of a similar model and emphasizing the great opportunity to acquire such a remarkable vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters express interest in the vehicle without overtly negative or positive sentiments. @SeaTacTom notes the car's impressive allure, mentioning its previous status at not met (RNM) for $62,000, prompting speculation about its potential sale price. They also pose a question regarding whether it could sell for less than $50,000, reflecting a curiosity about the market interest and driving prices for such vehicles. This neutral stance indicates a mix of admiration for the model while also engaging with the community's enthusiasm for the auction process.
Negative: While no overtly negative comments are present, the speculation from @SeaTacTom about the vehicle's potential selling price might reflect a concern that the bidding might not meet certain expectations or market evaluations. However, this concern is more of a commentary on market dynamics rather than a direct criticism of the vehicle itself. Overall, the comments largely lack negativity, with most users focusing on the car's positive attributes.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's condition and features. @genevamotorcars (The Seller) highlighted that the car smells like new BMW leather, indicating no harsh cleaning agents were used. @Mpower12 thanked the seller for their swift responses, describing the car as beautiful. Additionally, @Alfalagreca shared a personal experience, emphasizing the serene driving experience and unique features like the adjustable passenger seat control, enhancing the overall appeal of the vehicle.
Neutral: A number of comments sought clarification on vehicle specifics. @Eilig inquired about the use of carpet shampoo, any body panels protected with PPF, and the tire date codes. @Jim27 asked whether the car comes with two sets of keys. The seller responded to all inquiries, confirming there is only one key, with no PPF present on the vehicle, and provided tire dates as 2016 and 2021. Overall, the interaction was marked by questions and informative responses without strong emotional cues.
Negative: Some comments reflected frustration and skepticism. @Scotbaron expressed concerns regarding the delayed video uploads and referred to a possible misunderstanding about response times, to which @genevamotorcars (The Seller) reassured there was nothing wrong with the vehicle, simply bad weather affecting their response the previous day. @Scotbaron also received feedback that his comment was deemed non-constructive, pointing to a divide in how users were perceiving the information shared.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the design and uniqueness of the vehicle, particularly the solid red hood which @MoparMan13 confirmed is original from the factory. @1Dustman expressed enthusiasm for the overall aesthetics, suggesting the vehicle looks great in its current configuration. Additionally, @BPL76 noted that it looks exceptionally good in red, highlighting the appeal of its color scheme. The seller, @quickbowtie, emphasizes the vehicle's exceptional condition and rarity, having never been dealer prepped nor driven on the street, further contributing to its desirability. Also, the inclusion of impressive features, including carbon fiber wheels and a comprehensive documentation history, creates a strong positive sentiment around the vehicle's value and authenticity.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the nuances of the vehicle's specifications and its place in the market. @Dtheriault brought attention to how upcoming vehicles like the ZR1X might influence the market for the Demon 170, although noting that prices have remained robust contrary to initial expectations. The interaction between Corvette and Demon buyers was also explored by @redbull1790, who suggested they represent different segments of the car enthusiast community but noted the appeal of driving a muscle car like the Demon. There were practical inquiries as well, such as @Guilianna25's question about the reserve, which the seller confirmed, illustrating buyers' curiosity about the auction process itself.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the potential rarity and specifications of the vehicle. @stevenanastos expressed apprehension about the absence of the satin panel, noting that only a few Demon 170s share this characteristic. Comparisons were made with competitiveness in the market by @MoparMan13, who pointed out that differing buyer preferences could impact resale values negatively, depending on how hybrid supercars evolve. @Dtheriault suggested that while prices haven’t crashed as some predicted, the future could face fluctuations influenced by high-performance competitors in the market, hinting at potential instability and the need for careful consideration for prospective buyers.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the 2001 Ford Excursion's reliable performance and versatility. @BidRunner (The Seller) describes the vehicle as an excellent all-around vehicle that he enjoyed driving, particularly noting its capability to tow a Tacoma and a car trailer effortlessly. @Tdon56 appreciates the vehicle's specifications and even requests videos to demonstrate its operation, indicating a positive interest in its functionality. @CobraVic11 expresses enthusiasm about the truck's potential and alludes to its fun factor, showing that some commenters view the Excursion favorably based on its appearances and performance features.
Neutral: Several questions focus on the details and specifications of the vehicle, indicating that potential buyers are interested but still seeking more information. @klownhavok inquires about the towing capability with a car hauler, while @ExcursionNJ asks if the spark plugs have been replaced along with the coils. This kind of engagement suggests that these users are weighing their options and looking to clarify specific details before making a decision. Meanwhile, @ChelseaMan31 compares the truck to a high school coed that’s had too many dates, suggesting a sense of wear or history without outright negativity.
Negative: Some comments hint at concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @ChelseaMan31's analogy implies that despite its nice appearance, the vehicle might have underlying issues due to previous owners. Additionally, @klownhavok's inquiry about the truck's MPG raises concerns about fuel efficiency, particularly when towing, which might not meet some buyers' expectations. @BidRunner (The Seller) mentions the MPG while towing was only around 8.5, which may deter those looking for a more economical option. Overall, while there is interest, there are also reservations based on perceived performance.
|
|
|