Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments reflect awe and admiration for the breathtaking design and historical significance of the 1955 Mercedes-Benz 300SL Gullwing. Commentors like @Barryward express joy over the car's continued presence and contribution to automotive history, stating, "What a car glad the 55 is still alive." Enthusiasts like @boaboyoz highlight its stunning aesthetic, calling it a "glorious 300SL Gullwing, ravishing in Fire Engine Red" and @Dollycat3 acknowledges its incredible provenance and documentation, reinforcing its desirability among collectors. Several comments, including those from @redbullc and @Hogdaddy, celebrate the exceptional capabilities of the vehicle, proclaiming it an enduring piece of art and design brilliance that continues to captivate admirers even after 70 years.
Neutral: The seller, @silverarrowcarsltd, engages with commenters, providing insights about the auction process and the car's features. They note the interesting fact that this is their ninth 300SL listed on Benlley Auctions (BaT) and are seen encouraging bidding, reinforcing their reputation as a reputable seller within the community. Concerns regarding the vehicle's condition are discussed, particularly about minor imperfections like bubbles in the paint, with @silverarrowcarsltd clarifying that these are minor issues. Commentors express curiosity about various aspects of the car, gauging interest in further driving footage and discussing restoration history, while others reminisce about past experiences with the car and its market value.
Negative: While the excitement is palpable, some comments raised concerns about the car's condition, particularly regarding the surface imperfections hinted at by users like @Chrome693, who worry about potential costly repairs associated with what appears to be paint bubbles. Commentors like @jvan20p mention skepticism about whether such issues arise from previous accidents or poor care, indicating that some potential bidders may feel apprehensive. This sentiment echoes in the remarks from users like @huntermusic, who highlights the extensive restoration history that includes references to "removing Bondo" and fears relating to prior damage, which could deter cautious collectors from placing bids.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: A gorgeous Guards Red 911 Speedster has received high praise from multiple commenters, with @boaboyoz calling it a "FIRE specimen" and @GDogg noting it as a favorite among both Porsche enthusiasts and auto fans. The color combination from the 90s has captivated @Espanolie, who predicts collectors will be bidding high due to the low mileage. @00SolarTJ1 emphasizes its appeal, calling it possibly the sexiest car on BaT right now and expressing hope that the next owner will appreciate and drive it. Enthusiasts like @RobThePorscheMan declare it as the only real speedster since the originals, favoring its total analog design without modern limitations.
Neutral: The seller, @1600veloce, has provided a thorough overview of the 1989 Porsche 911 Speedster, detailing their experience as a seller with over 1,900 listings on BaT. @1600veloce mentions that all vehicles are stored in climate-controlled facilities, ready for delivery, and encourages potential buyers to schedule appointments for video tours. The car's history indicates it has only traveled 1 mile in the last five months, prompting inquiries from commenters like @Scott_S about the reasons behind such limited use. There is also conversation around the paint condition, with @Minkymink56 asking about possible paintwork, while @1600veloce explains there may have been a blend at some point.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns that may dampen enthusiasm. @Scott_S questioned the extremely low mileage, wondering about its implications for usability, while @Minkymink56 pointed out wide variations in paint meter readings, requesting clarification about any potential repainting. Additionally, @GECONN offered a sobering note, explaining that at 217 hp, the performance of the 1989 model cannot match that of subsequent Speedsters, cautioning potential buyers about performance expectations. This indicates that while the vehicle is regarded as beautiful, there are elements of uncertainty regarding both its condition and capabilities.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle receives high acclaim for its aesthetics and features, with @boaboyoz describing it as a 'rockstar red Ford GT' and an impressive specimen. Commenters like @KalebCars and @HNS58 appreciate the technocraft carbon accessories and the beautiful design of the car, emphasizing how it remains one of the coolest American cars ever built. Additional praise is given to the performance enhancements, as the seller confirms the car has been upgraded with superior modifications, enhancing its driving experience and horsepower.
Neutral: While there are many fans of the Ford GT, some comments indicate a need for more clarity regarding specific details. @Vincent998 mentions a lack of information on the car’s description, pointing out discrepancies with parts and asking about the availability of original components. The discussions around the car's history and its title, now located in California, generate interest and lead to inquiries about emissions compliance from potential buyers, with questions raised by @joshg1 and @MustangKing about smog tests and recall completions.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the vehicle's modifications and their implications, with @nota4re expressing skepticism regarding the car's condition, hinting at possible issues that may arise due to previous disassemblies. Comments from users like @95SupraWhite and @butane highlight the potential legal complications of registering the car in California, implying it may not meet specific environmental regulations. Additionally, concerns about the removal of original parts and the lack of a smog test certificate for buyers, as mentioned by @Sheltn4, contribute to reservations regarding the vehicle's sale.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg praises the vehicle as a "spectacular Triple Black Z8" and describes it as a "well optioned super low mile beauty," expressing enthusiasm about its condition. @Jsvendsen shares that the car has never been exposed to rain and was stored in a climate-controlled garage, emphasizing its well-maintained status as he highlights his own experience owning Z8s and hopes the next owner enjoys it as much as he did. @zarcherinok corroborates the car's condition and endorses @mikebaumtx as an honest seller, encouraging potential bidders to bid with confidence on this incredible Z8.
Neutral: @mikebaumtx, the seller, provides extensive details about the Z8's history, including previous ownership and maintenance, clarifying that while the first owner was in Louisiana, the current owner has ensured it was kept in good condition. The seller acknowledges questions from potential buyers regarding the replacements of parts like the headliner and headlights, providing transparency about past inspections and the care taken to maintain the car's condition. @barchettamax, who has owned multiple Z8s, raises concerns about potential flood damage and requests detailed information to reassure him of the car's integrity while appreciating the seller's prompt responses to inquiries.
Negative: Concerns surface with @WWIIII questioning whether the car had been underwater due to its history in Louisiana, prompting discussions about replacement parts and any potential flood damage. @barchettamax expresses skepticism about the meticulous maintenance claim considering issues like the electronic steering lock and broken mirror, while @JohnEStromJr and @Mdkillen echo worries about confirming whether the vehicle had any flood damage. Overall, there is a sense of apprehension among potential buyers regarding the car's past and the implications it may have on current functionality.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's visual appeal and build quality. @Cryobrad54 calls it an 'eye searing combination', appreciating its striking design, while @BigFrank points out that the seller has invested over $162,000 into this impressive yellow sports car, indicating its premium status. @manofmanuals describes it as a 'very nice build' with a successful mix of colors, further supported by @TLL78 who unequivocally states, 'I’m loven’ it.' Overall, the vehicle seems to leave a favorable impression on those who admire its design and features.
Neutral: The vehicle's information is fairly straightforward, detailing its unique options and upcoming delivery date. @newcarpro provides a concise overview of the delivery particulars, including the specific model as a 2024 Corvette Z06 with a low odometer reading of just 3 miles. Additionally, concerns regarding an open field action related to the Body Control Module, as noted in the vehicle specs, suggest diligence in ensuring all aspects of the car meet the required standards before delivery.
Negative: Despite the overall praise, some comments hint at personal preferences against the yellow color scheme. @Hulk2000's comment about 'ketchup and mustard' suggests a less favorable view of the color choice, indicating that it might not appeal to everyone. Additionally, @badcad acknowledges their usual dislike for yellow but concedes that the build quality is strong enough to attract more buyers, implying that while the color may be divisive, the overall craftsmanship could compensate for it.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the stunning aesthetic of the vehicle, notably its unique Fjord Green color and silver wheels. @Mandinga exclaimed, "What-a-build!" while @3Pedalonly mentioned the beauty of the car and remarked on how refreshing the silver wheels look. @Poorhouse found the combination of colors to be stunning and specifically highlighted the light gray interior that enhances the overall look. In fact, @Loggedon stated that this vehicle was converting him into a Porsche fan due to its spectacular color combination, and @Mandinga enthusiastically encouraged the seller to consider a no reserve auction, indicating a strong sense of excitement.
Neutral: Some comments discussed the perception of color in the photos versus reality, with @Tomhar3 and @smiles11 addressing the potential for different appearances depending on lighting conditions. @PrestigeWW posed questions about whether the car was ordered with satin neodyme and if Fjord looks more blue or green in person. @Chi_PT asked for clarification on what parts of the car had paint protection film applied, demonstrating a practical interest in the vehicle's features and its preservation. Overall, many contributors shared insights on the vehicle's quality and presentation without expressing strong emotional reactions, indicating a respectable neutral interest in its details.
Negative: A few participants pointed out concerns or confusion regarding the color description and interior specifications. @kfed humorously questioned his color vision, hinting at uncertainty over the car's appearance, while @dieselino57 noted a discrepancy in the reported color of the interior, describing it as looking like chalk instead of cream. @loudnotfast critiqued the combination of touring and center-lock wheels as illogical, which suggests that not every detail of the vehicle's design was universally appreciated. These mixed feelings about some aspects of the vehicle highlight that opinion about luxury cars can be quite subjective.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its quality and desirability. @homie3186 noted that this car is going to do very well, while @letthegypsyhaveit expressed preference for it over a new Subaru. @Mark50 shared admiration for the car's aesthetics, highlighting its unique blue and gold color scheme, and noted that these vehicles are thrilling to drive. Additionally, @NVGT350 conveyed heartfelt condolences to the seller and recognized the car as a fantastic machine, wishing them luck in the sales process.
Neutral: Comments reflecting neutral feedback included inquiries about the vehicle's condition and parts, as well as practical considerations related to ownership. @kmplace asked about the turnbuckles in the rear strut area, to which @godoffooz (The Seller) provided detailed explanations about their purpose. @Chene91 raised questions regarding the car's history and whether it had undergone any body work, while @NBR24HR asked about the timing belt service, showing interest in the vehicle's maintenance history. The seller responded transparently, providing various service updates and sharing links to parts and additional information.
Negative: Some commentary raised concerns regarding the car’s maintenance and service history. @homie3186 suggested that whoever wins the car should replace the timing belt to avoid potential engine issues. In another instance, @Chene91 expressed worry over the car having been tracked, stating, "just want to clarify the car in total went to 3 track events?" These questions highlight a cautious perspective from potential buyers, focusing on the implications of track usage and parts that may need attention.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @HighlandAcres1, the seller, presents the 2005 SL500 in excellent condition, well-maintained, and kept in a climate-controlled garage. The seller indicates that the car has been detailed and includes a full tank of gas for the new owner. The seller reassures potential buyers about the odometer reading of 16,603 miles, explaining previous discrepancies due to registration estimates by his grandmother, ultimately affirming that there has been no tampering with the odometer. The seller expresses enthusiasm for the auction and confidence in the vehicle's quality, describing it as a "stunner."
Neutral: Comments from users like @torville55 and @hankhorders address concerns about the odometer rollback issue, sharing personal experiences with similar situations. The seller clarifies that the odometer discrepancy arose from a misunderstanding during the registration process rather than any fraudulent activity. Additionally, the seller explains that the vehicle is wrapped to protect its paint, noting that the original color can be restored easily. This leads to discussions about the appearance of the vehicle and the ease of removing the vinyl wrap, with the seller providing reassurance about the pristine condition of the underlying paint.
Negative: While the car is described positively, concerns arise regarding the odometer issue, with users like @marcus1701 asking if it can be resolved with CarFax, indicating it might affect the vehicle’s value. @Bichonpaul expresses a preference for the original color and inquires about the costs to revert the wrap, hinting at potential hesitations from buyers regarding the wrap and its effect on the car's aesthetics. The seller discusses challenges with resolving the odometer issue with CarFax, which could deter potential buyers who are wary of any discrepancies affecting the car's perceived value.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the overall quality and condition of the MGB, with @sbraven noting it's one of the cleanest they've seen in a long time. @PM_Terra (The Seller) highlights the car's rarity, featuring options like air conditioning and a luggage rack. Commenters like @Dbran6172 express an inclination to believe the mileage is accurate and commend the car's appearance. Enthusiasts like @turbotravel and @glemon acknowledge how clean and original the MGB looks, with the latter indicating they were surprised by how much they enjoyed the model when they owned one.
Neutral: Several comments focus on inquiries regarding the car's specifications and history. @Aytch raises practical questions about the air conditioning and overall functionality, while @911online inquires about the car's original state and smog-check requirements. Sellers like @PM_Terra (The Seller) assure potential buyers that the car originally came from California and that it will come with a smog check. @sliproc also explains the implications of owning a vehicle in California concerning registration and smog checks, providing useful information for prospective buyers.
Negative: Concerns about the car's interior material arise, with @MGB6 questioning if the upholstery is leather, while @Dbran6172 supports the claim that it appears to be vinyl, indicating some uncertainty about the vehicle's details despite its overall appeal. Additionally, @sliproc mentions potential registration penalties in California, suggesting that owning this vehicle may come with hidden costs. There is also discussion about the maintenance challenges that might come with vintage vehicles, subtly indicating that while the car looks good, certain aspects may require attention or further verification.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @flipzip52 (The Seller) portrays the 350Z as a rare, low mileage vehicle that has been well taken care of by its previous owners. Enthusiasts like @letthegypsyhaveit express their excitement, suggesting that anyone would prefer this model over a new Nissan. @43Sells appreciates the car's fun driving experience, mentioning its excellent handling, while also sharing personal positive experiences from owning a similar model.
Neutral: @flipzip52 (The Seller) mentions that the vehicle has very low mileage at 8,650, clarifying that the car has been driven approximately 4,600 miles under his ownership since July 2020. He provides details about maintenance, confirming it has required little work, and reassures interested buyers that there are no mechanical or electrical issues. Commenters like @Mazdaseeker and @dogstar1111 ask questions regarding the vehicle's condition and capabilities, to which the seller responds positively, stating that everything functions properly and the car can be used for various driving purposes.
Negative: @porsche1986 questions the vehicle's mileage, implying skepticism regarding its high mileage status. @Mazdaseeker notes that @porsche1986's sarcastic comment could lead to negative reactions, illustrating how any discussion about mileage can be contentious among potential buyers. Overall, while most comments are positive or neutral, a few indicate doubts or concerns, primarily related to mileage and vehicle history.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @AIM_Motorsports expressed strong enthusiasm for the vehicle, stating "Love this!" @Haulgas also shared their appreciation, calling the truck "pretty sweet," while @LesJohn enjoys the truck's status as a mostly original "survivor" and resonates with the emotional aspect of selling a family-owned vehicle. @neilpierson25 likes the truck's good condition but finds it practical and encourages use rather than preserving it as a collectible.
Neutral: @Crow92 inquired about the corrosion mentioned and requested photos, which @SpcCwby (The Seller) promptly provided. @Carl_Millen asked if international buyers were welcome, to which @SpcCwby confirmed no objections, especially for bidders from Australia. Furthermore, @67COOP requested a driving video to confirm all lights work, and @SpcCwby responded with assurances and mentioned the need for a double clutch due to the original non-synchro transmission.
Negative: Concerns were raised with @SpcCwby acknowledging a crack in the passenger side rolling door glass, which some may find a downside. Additionally, while @SpcCwby addressed the operational status of the parking brake, the need to double clutch during gear changes might be an inconvenience for potential buyers used to modern vehicles. This blend of issues highlights that while the truck has charm and history, it may come with more quirks than a buyer used to newer models might be comfortable with.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @letthegypsyhaveit expresses a clear preference for the vehicle over a new Corvette, considering it a superior option. @rgilson7 agrees, highlighting features such as the round tail lights and electronic dash, which give it a classic appeal. @johnnydVette12345 adds to the conversation by sharing their pride in owning multiple C4 Corvettes and stating that these classic cars represent great value compared to new models.
Neutral: @AC2000 (The Seller) confirms that the RPO label is intact and has been verified through a decoder website. @kinglaw notes the car's aesthetic appeal and suggests that the seller should provide more photos to showcase its details, while also mentioning potential upgrades to enhance performance.
Negative: @pmafterdark criticizes the new Corvettes' design, calling them unattractive in contrast to the beloved C4 models. @JPKmotorhead points out the lack of Z51/Z52 RPO codes in the car, suggesting that the vehicle might lack features expected for its class. Additionally, @kinglaw acknowledges the absence of Z52 codes and mistakes in some previous observations, indicating uncertainty about the car's specifications.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ghm2112 commented positively on the vehicle's appearance, noting its attractive specification and low mileage. @pointer expressed admiration for the color and shared their own experience with similar models, highlighting the appeal of the 335is. @Kas320 reinforced this by sharing their own positive experience with the same car model, describing it as fast and composed, suggesting that the winning bidder would be pleased with their purchase.
Neutral: @greenerdays11 (The Seller) responded to inquiries with helpful information, offering to create walk-around and cold start videos as requested by @glenn930, and confirmed tire date codes of 2022 as per @mca_az's request. @stevew100 raised a question about a red triangle warning indicator but received confirmation from @greenerdays11 that no alerts were present, indicating a more positive state for potential buyers. @carlitosa asked about safety features like keyless entry and the winter package, to which @greenerdays11 provided detailed clarification.
Negative: @sinetyv expressed concern about the vehicle's ownership and maintenance history, questioning the high number of owners and frequency of brake fluid flushes. @juston615 raised issues regarding the retractable hard top, citing known problems with previous models, and sought reassurance about its condition, which may indicate apprehension from potential buyers about the car’s reliability. Overall, while there were some questions raised about the car's past, @greenerdays11 made efforts to address concerns and maintain transparency.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received praise for its aesthetic appeal, with @Swiftmotoring noting its great color and stating it is nice to see a mostly stock 911SC ready for driving. Many commenters like @letthegypsyhaveit express enthusiasm for the car, even suggesting they'd choose it over a new Porsche. @Bendreamin describes it as a beautiful car and inquires about possibly seeing a video of it in action, indicating a desire to know more about its performance.
Neutral: In terms of features, @Tirefriar asks about documentation regarding the engine and transmission rebuilds, while @David_P points out that the interior appears to be partially leather. @blue_smoke (The Seller) confirms these facts, expressing gratitude for the interest shown in the vehicle and providing information on various aspects including updates on past ownership documentation. @Caymanorcarrera inquires about specific mechanical aspects such as the airbox pop-off and hydraulic Carrera tensioners, which the seller confirms are present based on installation receipts.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised regarding the car's lack of air conditioning, with @Farfman noting its absence and @CarNutz118 commenting on the inefficiency of AC in similar models. @David_P points out that the listing does not mention the aftermarket adjustable rear anti-roll bar, hinting at potential oversight. Furthermore, @schportskarr casually questions the potential number of previous owners, suggesting uncertainty about the vehicle's history which might concern potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The 2025 Mercedes Winnebago Revel 44E is receiving a lot of positive attention for its outstanding condition, with only over 1100 miles and a successful trip to Sedona Oak Creek Canyon to test its systems. Commenters like @cenzed highlight the vehicle's luxurious features including a high torque twin turbo drivetrain, all-wheel drive, and an advanced lithium eco flow battery system, making it both enjoyable to drive and practical for daily use. Many comments express excitement about the sale and the RV's potential for exploring, with buyers appreciating the included camping essentials such as chairs and dishes. @boaboyoz and @TommyBruin also express admiration, wishing @cenzed luck in selling the vehicle and moving abroad, reflecting a supportive community atmosphere around the auction.
Neutral: Inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and features are prevalent, suggesting interest among potential buyers. For instance, @SirC51 asks about the presence of a receiver hitch, while @SELit inquires about the vehicle's towing capacity. @cenzed, the seller, provides detailed information, clarifying that the towing capacity is 5000 lbs and highlighting various specifications such as tank capacities and dimensions. Some buyers also discuss the vehicle's price compared to other similar models, indicating a healthy level of analysis and curiosity among commenters.
Negative: Not all commentary is positive, with some expressing skepticism about the overall value and reliability of such vehicles. @boaboyoz mentions hearing complaints about build quality from friends, indicating that there may be concerns regarding the construction of the Revel and similar models. Additionally, @Thetatebaumercollection and @Chadbrggs point out the challenges of driving these high roof vans in windy conditions and voice doubts about the auction's initial bid being set fairly. Commenters also share experiences of dissatisfaction with the usability of such RVs in everyday settings, further highlighting potential drawbacks, especially when traveling with families.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the car's beauty and aesthetic appeal, with users like @Segura911 appreciating the overall condition and expressing interest in seeing it in person. @RS60Spyder notes that the GTA wheels enhance the car's looks, while @jmb52055 and @Odink9 affirm its beautiful condition. @meccano admires the dashboard and wheels, while @eatonhong mentions that the car's suspension has been improved with an Alfaholics kit. Additionally, @DMSQ and @TONEPUB comment positively on the car's charm and potential for enjoyment, suggesting that it has been well cared for by the seller.
Neutral: The seller, @Scottyfrug, has engaged positively by responding to potential buyers' questions. He addresses inquiries regarding the car's rust condition in the underbody and provides transparency about its maintenance history, indicating the fuel injection belt has not been replaced during his ownership. Several users, such as @ar1950 and @analogautosport, discuss the longevity of the fuel injection pump belt and various repair options regarding the rust, indicating they understood the balance between cosmetic appeal and repair needs. Meanwhile, @surfdoc37 and @SirMichael57 inquire about specific rust repairs, showing a community interest in the technical aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns about rust damage under the car have been a prominent theme, with @analogautosport expressing disappointment over the lack of initial repairs despite the car's aesthetic upgrades. Several comments from users like @TomPayne and @Segura911 reflect worries about the extent of the rust and potential structural damage, indicating that a simple patch may not suffice for a long-term solution. @meccano comments on the unrealistic expectations of some prospective buyers, suggesting that many desire a fully restored vehicle without understanding the compromises regarding rust repairs. This sentiment is echoed by @analogautosport, who cautions potential buyers regarding the unknown structural integrity of the vehicle.
![]() |
8BA Flathead-Powered, 1929 Ford Model A Custom Aluminum Boattail Roadster
M2982237
Lot 198108
Private Party
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments express admiration for the unique custom features of the vehicle, with @Knuckles-R-Busted highlighting its individuality and potential to stand out at car events. @porkpiehat appreciates the charm of the roadster while offering suggestions for improvement, such as finding a more period-correct steering wheel. @Capt_Nemo shares fond memories of hydraulic brakes and emphasizes the vehicle’s historical significance, which adds to its allure. The user @Sc0ttied00 (The Seller) receives good wishes for the auction from various commenters, suggesting overall positive interest in the vehicle's uniqueness.
Neutral: Several comments seek clarification and additional details about the vehicle's specifications. @McCool23 and @Davey_Jones ask about modifications to the frame and suspension, noting their interest in details like shock absorbers, undercarriage photos, and the history of the chassis. @Gussy requests information on the vehicle’s operational aspects, such as lighting and performance indicating a desire to understand the vehicle more thoroughly before making any decisions. These inquiries suggest a practical engagement with the vehicle's features.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the absence of a Ruckstell two-speed rear axle, with @Y-Blockhead and @Cryobrad54 both noting its lack. @McCool23 prompts questions about the chassis year and the vehicle’s modifications, indicating uncertainty about its authenticity. Additionally, @genelaroe points out the transition to hydraulic brakes and raises concerns about the brake system's reliability in earlier models. These comments reveal a cautious perspective regarding the vehicle's potential issues and historical accuracy.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @longjay (The Seller) provided detailed information about the vehicle, including its location, shipping options, and full ownership history which includes importation paperwork from the US to Canada. Many commenters appreciate the upgrades that have been made to the car, specifically highlighting the 16-inch Bundt wheels, with @CarDogThreePedals noting their great appearance and @macarbon_johnnyb recommending them as an ideal choice. Additionally, @69_911e noted that despite being underpowered, the car can still deliver a fun driving experience, and @Type44 expressed joy in seeing how the larger wheels transform the car's aesthetic.
Neutral: The discourse around the 1981-85 Mercedes 380SL includes some mixed sentiments about its performance and desirability compared to other models, particularly the 450 and 560. @Noisyboyz remarked on the 380's reputation as one of the least desirable models due to its performance compromises, while others like @Garageman inquired about the AC's functioning. @macarbon_johnnyb mentioned the practicality of the wheels and noted that the vehicle has already undergone necessary mechanical work, indicating that the condition and mileage are significant factors in its valuation.
Negative: Several comments highlight the car's underpowered reputation and view it as less desirable than its counterparts. @Noisyboyz pointed out that the 380SL was an attempt to improve gas mileage without preserving performance, which ultimately led to it being less favored among collectors. @CarFoolLane noted that the car's wheels appear out of proportion, and the general consensus suggests that while the 380SL has its merits, it’s overshadowed by the more powerful 560 model. Furthermore, @Garageman's inquiry into the AC's current status revealed inconsistencies in its functionality, a point of concern for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Searle804 shared a positive experience with his similar truck, noting its impressive performance and longevity even at over 90,000 miles. He described the handling as tight, akin to a sports car, and mentioned that despite minor noises from the turbo wastegate and heat shield, the cam phaser issues were not present in his truck. He appreciates the uniqueness of Raptors and expressed a desire to keep it for the long haul. @MikeR., on the other hand, highlighted the rarity and desirability of the specific options in the truck, particularly the Blue Recaro seats and Carbon Fiber interior, underscoring that it adds unique value.
Neutral: @JWW007 (The Seller) responded to questions and comments regarding the performance and concerns about the cam phaser issues associated with the 3.5L EcoBoost engine. He confirmed that he was unaware of any cam phaser problems with the truck he is selling but acknowledged the existence of the issue in general discussions. The seller was engaging with various commenters about their past experiences and service issues, particularly regarding the sunroof repair process that did not go as intended, shifting the dialogue towards trust in seller transparency and vehicle condition.
Negative: @jamisdiablo and others raised concerns about the history of repairs and potential unresolved issues, notably questioning the handling of the sunroof repair and service contract. The tone indicated a skepticism about how previous problems were managed, implying a lack of due diligence on the seller's part. @ContSp68 and @PhrogPilot commented on the approach of sellers who appear unwelcoming to potential bids, suggesting that it may hinder interest and raise concerns about the seller's attitude towards transactions.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is highly praised for its exceptional condition and low mileage of 41,000, making it a standout 2000 Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet. @boaboyoz describes it as 'totally fab' and appreciates its lovely Biarritz White color, while @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) emphasizes extensive maintenance that includes significant updates like the replaced IMS, soft top, and various other components. Moreover, the seller highlights their commitment to transparency by providing numerous detailed videos and photos, ensuring prospective buyers can bid with confidence and have a clear understanding of the vehicle's current state.
Neutral: Comments reflect some inquiries about specific features, such as the status of the hardtop. @HenryDurham questions whether the hardtop came with the vehicle, leading to a brief exchange with @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) regarding its unclear history. Additionally, @lawnboy911 initially questions details about the Hi-Fi sound system but later corrects himself after further research, indicating a collective engagement from the community regarding the vehicle's specifications.
Negative: There are few negative comments, but @lawnboy911 raises a concern regarding the Hi-Fi sound system interface, suggesting potential buyers should be wary of the system's presence. This slight confusion points to the importance of thorough verification of vehicle features before bidding. Overall, while the feedback is mostly positive, the comments indicate that there are still details that buyers might want to clarify with the seller.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praise the 2023 Porsche 718 Cayman GT4 RS for being a thrilling and driver-focused vehicle, expressing excitement about its performance and sound. @MPM97turbo expresses a strong desire for the car, wishing to return to the track with it. @Fisher shares a positive experience from a rental, highlighting its exhilarating capabilities on the autobahn and mountain passes, and describes it as a well-rounded car for both track and street. @Jack-Porsche notes its phenomenal attributes on both street and track, suggesting that those who invest in such a high-value vehicle will not be deterred by extra costs for upgrades like bucket seats.
Neutral: The discussions also touch on the debate about seat options, particularly regarding the balance between comfort and track readiness. @GattoVeloce (The Seller) emphasizes the practicality of the comfort seats for everyday driving, while @Rdulskis recognizes that bucket seats are more common for track-spec vehicles. @Visceral mentions seeing half of these cars at the track, affirming the choice of seat typically depends on the owner's usage. Multiple commenters agree that while the comfort seats are suitable for street use, many would consider upgrading to race-oriented seats for serious track pursuits, which is a point of contention in the comments.
Negative: On the downside, several users express criticism regarding the choice of bucket seats, arguing they can be uncomfortable for daily driving. @Theapplez asserts that Porsche's bucket seats are inadequate for serious track enthusiasts and suggests aftermarket alternatives. @Schnellste states that if one plans to seriously track the GT4 RS, comfort seats must be swapped for performance-oriented options. @Mwar99 disagrees with this sentiment, stating personal preference varies, highlighting the subjective nature of seat comfort. Overall, a few users express frustration over the idea of not utilizing such an extraordinary car to its fullest potential, implying that many GT4 RS vehicles end up being underused as collectibles rather than driven.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle's performance and design, noting its appeal as a police car. @Calstickshift mentioned that it would help clear out slow drivers from the left lane, while @SWL1956 highlighted the car's capabilities in real-life high-speed pursuits, encouraging others to check out videos involving Arkansas State Police. @Paul_Allen shared his love for a similar V8 Charger he purchased, emphasizing that it provided a quick and smooth driving experience, which @2009G8GT supported by expressing admiration for the performance videos available online.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the vehicle's background, including details about its police specifications and previous sales attempts. @filmvehicle (The Seller) provided information about the car's service and lightbar functionality. @newcarpro detailed the extensive list of standard and optional equipment, highlighting the various police and performance features of the 2015 Dodge Charger Police RWD, while some commenters sought more specific details about its history and usage, such as the hours clocked and service records.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the legality and practicality of owning a vehicle that can be confused for a police car. @btober jokingly questioned whether he would get pulled over for impersonating a cop, to which @Acceleratii_Incredibus advised that while it may not be illegal, it could lead to trouble. @Dmny shared his frustration about perceptions tied to the car's appearance, noting that it often leads to unwarranted anxiety among drivers who assume he is a police officer. Overall, there were voices of caution regarding the challenges that could come with owning such a distinctive car.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @natkingcolebasket69 expresses their admiration for this vehicle, noting that Mercedes no longer produces models of this quality. @JarrodG72 shares their positive experiences, highlighting the enjoyment of their previous vehicles and noting the importance of the trip odometer and cruise control functionality, while also appreciating the working gauges in the recent driving video. @Captdavid reminisces about the vehicle they owned, praising its ability to attract attention, reliability, and ease of maintenance, while complimenting its stunning paint job except for the hood. @Ratty and @crownstooge also commend the car, with @Ratty particularly enjoying their own version, and @crownstooge urging potential buyers to seize the opportunity due to its affordability in the collector’s market.
Neutral: @1911nineeleven (The Seller) responds to @JarrodG72 confirming that both the trip and odometer are functioning. They also mention they are closing in on the auction deadline and provide invoices related to the car, suggesting some transparency in the sale. Questions raised by @B_Newman regarding wiring harness and other mechanical concerns, such as the head gasket and convertible top condition, were acknowledged with responses indicating no known issues, although limited service history exists, which adds a layer of uncertainty about the vehicle's past maintenance.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the vehicle, particularly about critical components like the wiring harness and hydraulics for the convertible top. @B_Newman specifically inquires about the condition of these parts, indicating that potential buyers should be cautious and seek clarity. @chaluce criticizes the seller for not adequately addressing the questions posed by interested parties, which could lead to apprehension among bidders regarding the seller's transparency and reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments overall reflect a strong admiration for the 2008 Mercedes SL550 being auctioned. @FFM1969 (The Seller) describes the vehicle as being in exceptionally beautiful condition, listing its features and assuring potential buyers that there are no mechanical or electrical issues. Several bidders, such as @ipsus, confirm the car's condition by sharing their own experiences of inspecting and driving the car, expressing confidence in both the seller's honesty and in the vehicle's quality. The last-minute enthusiasm from bidders indicates a competitive interest, with @FFM1969 urging watchers not to miss out on the opportunity to own such a well-maintained car.
Neutral: Throughout the comments, there are inquiries about specific details of the vehicle's past maintenance, including questions about the ABC suspension and the vehicle's service history. @Frank1951 and others ask about repairs and updates, specifically regarding the oil change interval and the status of the smog certification, to which @FFM1969 provides clarifications that the necessary services have been performed and reported accurately. These exchanges reveal a thorough process of addressing buyer concerns and transparency regarding the vehicle's history, contributing to a well-rounded understanding of the car's condition and servicing.
Negative: Some uncertainty arises from mentions of the car's history, specifically regarding the minor accidents reported by Carfax which @FFM1969 attempts to clarify. @Frank1951 raises concerns about body damage and whether it has been properly repaired, to which @FFM1969 offers reassurance but acknowledges the alarming nature of minor accident reports. Additionally, while most comments express satisfaction, there are potential buyers like @Skyce posing questions about components such as the balance shaft gear and throttle body, which highlights a concern about whether all required maintenance has been completed, indicating that not every bidder feels entirely assured despite the seller's assurances.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments reflect admiration for the vehicle, particularly its striking Midnight Blue color, believed to be factory shade 904G. @Dollycat3 praises its gorgeous appearance, and several users highlight the timeless beauty of the Mercedes Cabriolet, appreciating its classic design and craftsmanship. @whipcity76 emphasizes the car's unique charm and the joy of owning a well-maintained vintage model, while @Luz_do_sol notes the aesthetically pleasing color combination and the strong performance of the M130 engine. The community expresses excitement and respect for the vehicle's history and condition, with the seller, @shopclubsautogroup, also receiving praise for transparency and engagement with potential buyers.
Neutral: Comments include inquiries about the car's history and restoration needs. @Tillegem asks for details about the original color scheme, while @gbdunn38 inquires about the previous sales. @PhilSanchez expresses his concerns about the vehicle's condition, specifically asking about rust, interior needs, and overall restoration requirements. @GDP also raises questions about rust damage, showing that while many are interested in the car, they are also looking for thorough details regarding its current state. Meanwhile, @coinmachine notes that various aspects of the vehicle, like leather and wood, require attention, positioning it as a project car rather than a perfect specimen.
Negative: Some commenters express skepticism about the vehicle's overall condition. @PhilSanchez identifies multiple areas needing attention such as interior replacements, a potential compression test, and concerns about rust. @coinmachine mentions the car as needing a full restoration and criticizes its various elements like leather, wood, paint, and top condition. @whipcity76 raises concerns about the previous bidder's lack of research, implying that there should be better measures in place to prevent misunderstandings about such a unique vehicle. Overall, while there is a recognition of the car's merits, several comments underscore the work needed to bring it to its best potential.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Spider_Mike shared fond memories of owning a similar Toyota, praising its solid build and reliability, indicating this particular 4Runner seems nicely broken in. @CaddyNelson noted the impressive maintenance record, highlighting over $10,000 in receipts for essential repairs. @911993 (The Seller) expressed pride in their well-maintained 4Runner, noting its unique color and smooth driving experience, also drawing attention from neighbors and strangers alike. @mpeezy complimented the paint condition compared to their own, reflecting on the vehicle’s aesthetic appeal and good luck wishes to the seller, while @FA20FTW recognized the car's exceptional condition and uniqueness, reassuring potential buyers of their investment in such a classic vehicle.
Neutral: @911993 (The Seller) responded to various inquiries about the vehicle, confirming that it has been registered in California for 24 years and is now registered in Arizona. They addressed concerns regarding a minor accident, providing context and reassurance through detailed photos. @RobertGarland raised a question about the seller's recent purchase and intention to sell so soon, prompting a candid explanation of the seller's intentions to thin their collection and fund a new purchase. Comments about the vehicle's features included the Toyota VIP Security System and other minor characteristics such as the glued hood protector.
Negative: @Cork12 expressed disappointment about the absence of a locker in the vehicle, indicating a lack of interest despite the car's looks. @U0NLYLV4N0W made a controversial statement about sunroofs, suggesting they should be banned, which might deter some potential bidders. While these negative comments do not significantly impact the overall perception of the vehicle, they do reflect individual preferences that could influence potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @drbarks commented on the vehicle as having a beautiful color combination and an impressive options list. @Cargeek81 found the sound of the car to be captivating and compelling enough to sell itself. @DFrost78 praised the seller's trustworthiness and described the car as a beautiful machine that appeared like new, suggesting a positive overall impression of the vehicle's condition. @Fargin expressed enthusiasm about the car, indicating that it would be a prized addition next to his own vehicle. Additionally, @UncleJake highlighted the appealing color combination of the Maserati, which further emphasizes its visual attractiveness to potential buyers.
Neutral: @rlaverty (The Seller) provided a detailed list of items needing attention, such as the need to program a second key, issues with TPMS tire sensor calibration, and the completion of other minor repairs. He mentioned that while the TPMS sensors had been replaced, they still needed to be synchronized, potentially requiring professional assistance. There were also inquiries about the history of maintenance records, particularly from 2022, but @rlaverty clarified he didn't have additional records, noting what repairs he had conducted for transparency.
Negative: @RS60Spyder expressed concerns about the age of the TPMS sensors, suggesting they might be problematic if not replaced. @Thunderuppaul pointed out the notorious maintenance history of this model and questioned whether additional maintenance had been performed since the last recorded service, expressing skepticism. Furthermore, @SoExSo raised concerns about the car's interior regarding 'stickie buttons', which are common issues in these cars, and while @rlaverty confirmed some repairs had been made, he noted that not all buttons had been restored to perfect condition.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed excitement over the vehicle being a Heritage Edition that was actually driven, acknowledging it as a rare sight among collectors. @EGuyer1521 commended the seller for ensuring the car was enjoyed, while @MillerMustang praised the good luck wishes for bidders. @Schuler shared an appreciation for the car and location, implying that owning such a vehicle is dream-worthy, and @lowmileageGuy anticipated that the car would become priceless in the coming years.
Neutral: Several comments focused on specifics regarding the vehicle, such as whether the stripes were vinyl or painted, which @hdwilk52 asked about and @NVGT350 confirmed as vinyl. @newcarpro provided extensive specifications about the car, detailing model information and production specifics. The seller, @SXactual, clarified past ownership experiences, stating that the vehicle was not tracked and also addressed the condition and repairs necessary after a minor incident.
Negative: There were concerns expressed about the pricing and availability of the vehicle, with @Schuler lamenting the potential of it going over $90K, highlighting market demand. @hpizking raised questions about the condition of the front wheel and whether the original trim piece was also replaced, suggesting apprehension over modifications. @IlliniBoss questioned the status of the factory car cover, indicating that there were inconsistencies with the aftermarket product in comparison to what was originally provided.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments praise the 1974 Corvette for its rarity and originality. @johnnyvett highlights it as the best of 74 with desirable features like the big block engine and convertible options. Others like @BigRedBrad and @Coronette express admiration for the car's exceptional condition and original design, noting that it is extremely rare to find such well-preserved examples. @Vettes33 and @ESQL88427 commend the car for being a survivor and emphasize the desirability of unmolested original cars.
Neutral: There are various inquiries and fact-sharing about the car's specifications and options among commenters. @gravelgrinder requests NCRS scoring sheets, while @Kenvette and @CorvetteMike discuss the potential installation of Vintage Air, highlighting differing opinions on whether it should be added to an original vehicle. Additionally, @texxas points out a discrepancy regarding the tires being labeled as bias ply when they are actually radial, which the seller confirms and updates accordingly.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns regarding modernization options for Classic cars. @cyclemikey expresses apprehension about adding Vintage Air, suggesting it detracts from the car's originality. @CarFoolLane humorously remarks that convertibles aren't as enjoyable in scorching weather, pointing out potential practicality issues faced by owners, especially in hot climates. Moreover, there are discussions about past issues with fitting certain wheels and tires, hinting at concerns over modifications and their impact on the vehicle's integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Bobd240000 (The Seller) has responded positively to inquiries about the vehicle, assuring potential buyers that there is indeed one key fob available. He has clarified that while there were initial issues with the CD player, it was simply a case of using the wrong cassette. He has since obtained the correct cassette and confirmed that both the CD player and radio are functioning properly. Additionally, he has taken the initiative to create a video demonstrating the CD player in action, which will be added to the listing on the platform.
Neutral: @Latandatt appreciates the detailed response from @Bobd240000 (The Seller) and is interested in further showcasing the vehicle's capability by requesting a video demonstration of the suspension system's operation. This suggests that there are additional features of the vehicle that potential buyers may want to see, highlighting an ongoing engagement with the listing as it evolves.
Negative: One concern raised by @DriveOnBy is regarding the limitations of having only one key for the vehicle. This limitation could be viewed as a downside by potential buyers, as having only one key could cause inconvenience or additional costs for replacements. @DriveOnBy also expressed concern about the initial malfunctioning of the CD player, indicating a lack of clarity for prospective buyers about the vehicle's audio capabilities before @Bobd240000's clarifications.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @EstorilFarms commented that the car is a great value at a steal of a price, highlighting its appeal. @rufusW123 praised @Tony560 for the detailed care and maintenance he provided, showcasing the appreciation for the vehicle's condition and the seller's commitment. @Undertaker remarked on the wonder of the engineering of similar Mercedes models, noting that his own experience with a 300D has been enjoyable and reliable, which paints the W123 in a similarly positive light.
Neutral: @Tony560 provided a comprehensive overview of the vehicle's history and maintenance, acknowledging that while the paint could be better, the interior is in great shape, and the car is mechanically sound. The seller also mentioned some minor issues, like a small leak in the fuel line, demonstrating transparency about the vehicle's condition. @Patrick shared an interesting note about the car's previous identity, indicating that it's had a student-driver past, yet it remains quite functional as a safe and reliable vehicle for young drivers.
Negative: Despite the overall positive comments, @Tony560 expressed a concern about the car's paint condition, and @Patrick pointed out that it shows signs of use, implying that it may need cosmetic improvements. Additionally, @Tony560 highlighted a small leak at the back of the car that he had to address, suggesting some maintenance concerns that potential buyers should consider. Overall, while the vehicle has many good aspects, there are a few drawbacks noted that could impact buyer interest.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Freestyling described the vehicle as beautiful and seemed interested in a build sheet, reflecting a strong aesthetic appeal for the car. @Rdulskis referred to it as a "sexy beast," which indicates an appreciation for its design and overall presence. This positive feedback hints at a consensus among some commentators that the vehicle's visual attributes stand out significantly.
Neutral: @Indyraz brought up a point about the maintenance history, specifically regarding the brake fluid and plugs being changed at 11k miles, posing a question that reflects curiosity about the vehicle's care. @Jlico911 added to this by suggesting that the time rather than mileage could explain the maintenance decisions, indicating an analytical approach to the vehicle’s upkeep without expressing strong opinions either way. @Androo007, the seller, provided clarifications about the wrap removal and service history, showcasing a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: There were no explicitly negative comments about the vehicle, but @Indyraz's inquiry regarding the maintenance might suggest a concern about the service frequency, which could be perceived negatively depending on the buyer's perspective. @Androo007's mention of the wrap and the related costs could also imply an additional financial consideration that potential buyers might view unfavorably. Overall, while the comments generally leaned positive, these inquiries hint at deeper considerations that could raise concerns for some.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments reflect an appreciation for the car's design and condition, with @CoopCity noting its underrated looks and @SaabSnob expressing admiration as a long-time Saab owner. @LSU2020 also complimented the vehicle, calling it a beautiful gem and appreciating an interesting detail in one of the pictures. Overall, the vehicle seems to have garnered positive remarks about its aesthetic qualities and preservation.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about the vehicle's specifications and history, with @dalejefferson123 asking about tire date codes and @Jeepers84 inquiring about the timing belt replacement. The seller, @Bigguyminn, provided detailed responses, noting that the tires were recently replaced and that the timing belt had not been changed yet but recommended it be done later. Other neutral comments involved logistical questions about obtaining temporary permits for out-of-state driving and the functioning of the car's air conditioning and heating system.
Negative: There were some concerns raised, particularly regarding potential common issues with this vehicle model. @Jackthehack expressed this by asking about the condition of the headliner, spare tire availability, and water leaks. Additionally, @60vwbus raised questions about the functionality of various features in the car, including the heated seats and dome lights. Overall, while there are some issues highlighted, they are mostly procedural or related to maintenance rather than severe defects.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The 2017 Ford F-550 Power Stroke Passenger Bus has generated excitement among the community, with @BDAS (The Seller) emphasizing its versatility for various purposes like transportation, party rentals, or converting into a unique camper. @BDAS also highlighted recent maintenance, including replacing the washer pump and various gaskets, listing new front tires and rear brakes, which adds to the bus's reliability. The bus is presented with enthusiasm, indicating that it's a reliable vehicle with a powerful 6.7 Power Stroke Diesel engine, making it a favorable choice for potential buyers.
Neutral: Comments from @pbita54 and @ChelseaMan31 suggest the bus could be an urban assault vehicle, while others inquire about specs like headroom and interior dimensions. @BDAS provided details on the wheelbase and interior height, which shows the seller's responsiveness to queries, helping clarify what the vehicle can offer. There is also discussion about the CDL requirements based on the vehicle's configuration, with suggestions on how to adjust it to meet personal needs, such as removing seats.
Negative: Some users raised concerns regarding the bus's licensing requirements. @pbita54 noted that a CDL might be necessary due to the passenger capacity, even though the vehicle's weight doesn't mandate it. @classicguy57 specifically asked if seating could be uninstalled for transport purposes, indicating hesitation about regulatory complexities. The dialogue around licensing reflects a potential barrier for some buyers looking for a straightforward vehicle to operate while remaining conscientious about compliance, which adds an element of uncertainty to the purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the overall quality and aesthetic of the Camaro being auctioned. @greatscott called it a great car, wishing the seller good luck, while @HemiHayes expressed a desire for a similar model, indicating a strong admiration for the vehicle. @boaboyoz referred to the Camaro as Madeira Maroon magnificence, emphasizing the beautiful build and contributing to a positive image of the restoration work by the seller, @Dwright1956. Others, like @TopDeadCenter09 and @funkaholik, highlighted how well the car has been cared for, appreciating the noticeable transformation it underwent during the restoration. The meticulous nature of the seller's work, showcased in clean workshop premises and careful detailing, received accolades from multiple users.
Neutral: Comments also included factual discussions about the vehicle's specifications and restoration details. @Dwright1956, the seller, provided transparency regarding the restoration process, detailing the parts and authenticity of the drivetrain. Several users inquired about specific aspects of the car's build, such as the replacement of floor pans and body panels, seeking to ascertain the extent of the restoration. Additionally, questions about the car's original features, like the optional tachometer and power brakes, were raised by users like @Marco6769 and @1969camaro, reflecting a neutral yet informative exchange about the vehicle's history and features without overt negativity.
Negative: There were some critical notes from users regarding certain aspects of the car's restoration. @ouch pointed out minor fixes required, suggesting that while the car is nice, it isn't without its needs. Similarly, there was some skepticism about the engine block information provided by the seller, particularly from @ssterry who questioned the history of the block and whether the seller had comprehensive records prior to its rebuild. Comments like these indicate a cautious approach among some commenters, highlighting potential areas of concern amid the overall positive reception of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments showcase a strong admiration for the 2019 Ferrari Portofino, particularly praising its beautiful presentation and appealing features. @waffles2 expressed enthusiasm for the model, wishing the auction good luck, while @ARC944 noted the well-presented nature of the car and reminisced about their interest in it from a previous listing. @BLBCARS inquired about the factory warranty, emphasizing the vehicle's value and longevity, while @DRMbarry and @ARC944 engaged in a friendly discussion about the car's specifications, each affirming confidence in its options and overall appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @1600veloce, provided thorough information on the Portofino, offering potential buyers insights into the vehicle's condition and service history. They noted that the car runs great with a new battery and tires, and mentioned the extensive maintenance performed recently. Exclusive options totaling around $41k were highlighted, including the Magneride suspension and carbon fiber elements, which reflect the vehicle's driver-centric design. Additionally, specifics on the sale process were communicated, inviting bidders to express any queries or appointment requests.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the vehicle's condition, with @Noit questioning its operational reliability and asking whether any repairs or issues were present. @itsallaboutcars expressed skepticism based on prior experiences with Ferrari vehicles, indicating caution due to potential technical complications. Overall, while the positive commentary outweighed the negatives, these doubts pointed out the typical apprehensions associated with high-end car transactions.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's performance and features, with @CactusKing (The Seller) highlighting the truck's strong running condition, minimal leaks, and effective towing capability. The flatbed is securely bolted and the cab shows minimal rust, making it a solid driver ready for use. @Bdogz69 described it as a 'pretty cool rig' with many options, indicating a positive perception of the vehicle's utility and potential.
Neutral: Several comments included playful references to classic songs and bands such as @Justification's mention of an Eagles bumper sticker and the subsequent references by @TRAVELL and @Sheltn4 to Lynyrd Skynyrd and Eagles lyrics. These comments contribute to a light-hearted atmosphere around the vehicle auction, while simultaneously reflecting an appreciation for the truck that aligns with nostalgia and Americana culture.
Negative: Some concerns surfaced regarding the truck's fuel gauge and engine RPMs when towing heavy loads, as noted by @Aegis43 and @bill-d-c. @Aegis43 specifically cautioned about the truck's performance with a load attached, hinting at possible risks. While these concerns did not overshadow the overall excitement around the vehicle, they did reflect a cautious attitude toward its operational aspects and usability.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetics and unique character. @cfield described it as a 'great looking and running Pao!', while @pepfoot called it 'VERY cool!' and @jrcmlc simply stated 'Pao!'. @thunder007 also chimed in with a positive note, reinforcing the car's coolness. @Pocatello commented on its fascinating details and stated that driving the car would almost guarantee a good mood, emphasizing its appeal as a fun vehicle. Additionally, the seller, @autoplus615, emphasized the condition of the car, asserting that it is cleaner than others on the market and a great opportunity for buyers.
Neutral: Several comments provided general information about the vehicle without clear positive or negative connotations. @ray28 inquired about the air conditioning, to which @autoplus615 confirmed that it works and encouraged potential buyers to check videos for details. @neddyo292 asked about potential seat damage under a cover, receiving clarification from the seller that the seat is like new, with the cover used for display purposes. @jcayce raised a question about whether Nissan's specific paint type was used in the car's restoration, and @citabria98 shared a personal experience regarding a car dealership known for its Japanese models, noting the high prices but decent customer service.
Negative: A few comments contained concerns or queries that hinted at potential issues. @neddyo292 specifically asked about any damage to the passenger seat, indicating a wariness about the car's condition. @jcayce mentioned bodywork and noted the unique paint characteristics of the Pao, pointing out how different panels might fade differently. While these comments weren't overtly negative, they highlighted potential issues that future buyers might want to investigate further. Additionally, @blackbelt pointed out that while there are many interesting Japanese models available, the prices can be high, suggesting a level of caution regarding value.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Collectibleclassics highlighted the 2010 BMW M3 Convertible's recent maintenance, showcasing a range of services that were completed including a rear pinion seal, throttle actuators, and routine fluid changes. Their commitment to quality is strengthened by their high Google Reviews rating of 4.9/5.0, indicating that many customers have had positive experiences with the dealership. They also emphasize a transparent and smooth transaction process, reassuring potential buyers of their professionalism.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @will951, acknowledged that issues like actuators and pinion seals are common for vehicles of this age, with personal experiences shared about similar models. There was an inquiry from @rsimkins13 regarding the buyer's fee policy on failed transactions, raising a point about the auction process that the seller did not comment on. Overall, these discussions reflect an active consideration of the vehicle's condition and sales dynamics without expressing strong opinions either way.
Negative: @tchadwell expressed concern about the previous buyer's sudden withdrawal, which could indicate a potential issue with the vehicle or the transaction process. Others like @Secretariat19 noted that it's unfortunate for the seller, highlighting the unpredictability of auctions and potential seller frustrations. The lack of firm answers regarding auction fee policies from @Collectibleclassics left some commenters questioning the fairness of the process in situations where buyers back out.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed their love for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetics and performance. @Gk944 stated that their Saab convertible is super fun to drive and receives many thumbs up due to its great color combination. @AlGreenman also shared positive experiences from test driving the car, noting that the engine pulls strong and the turbo performs well. @Gjetson praised the vehicle's appearance, particularly its cherry red color, suggesting that it would look even better with different wheels. The Seller, @GemClassicCars, mentioned the car's exceptional mechanical and cosmetic condition for its mileage, affirming that it has been thoroughly cared for over the years.
Neutral: Commenters raised valid questions regarding the car's specifics and condition. @martinaricejr inquired about the rear passenger window's functionality, while @AndrewC brought up concerns about the Girling brakes and gearbox wear on older models. @GF2022 and @Nate540 posed questions about the vehicle's durability, mileage, and inspection status, highlighting some uncertainty common among potential buyers of older vehicles. @IMissMySaab discussed auction bidding strategies, indicating a mixed understanding of the auction style while pointing to the necessity of starting bids low in a no-reserve auction format.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism towards novelty bids in the auction process. @Swede67 questioned the validity of such bids, while other users, including @richardlava, defended their entertainment value without intending harm. @chastehel and @IMissMySaab also noted that low starting bids are commonplace and not detrimental to the auction. However, the back-and-forth between bidders highlighted a divisive perspective on auction practices, with some commenters feeling frustrated by the unpredictability and perceived frivolity in the bidding process.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's custom features, particularly praising the unique airbox and its potential high performance. @Sandpiper noted the need for a driving video to truly appreciate the car's sound and capabilities. @gh356 highlighted its status as an excellent example, emphasizing the potential enjoyment it could bring to Californian collectors if legislation regarding smog regulation changes, while @Skodanske and others appreciated its aesthetics and improvements over the years, specifically mentioning the appealing wheels and the overall look of the car. The strength of the car's driving capability and stability was highlighted by @Todd_F, who shared fond memories of ownership and modifications that enhanced performance.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific features and details regarding the vehicle's condition, performance, and modifications. @PHX_Scorp, the seller, was responsive and provided information about the engine specifications, indicating that it has been upgraded from a 1.8 to a 2.0 block, producing an estimated 150+ hp. There were also discussions about the car's AC system and various mechanical components, with @Jimbo2300S and @Todd_F seeking clarification on what remains of the originally installed equipment. The challenges associated with registering the car in California due to emission regulations were also addressed, with multiple users underscoring the importance of upcoming legislation.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding rust and possible repairs. @NTFasola speculated about the nature of some pink filler material in the car, and @Hardley pointed out visible issues with the distributor cap, suggesting an unfinished patch job. Additionally, there were discussions questioning the authenticity and installation of certain engine components, specifically regarding carburetors, with @Slapshifter expressing skepticism. @mikeroten underscored the difficulties of registration in California until pertinent legislation passes, voicing reservations tied to the car's emissions history and original pollution control equipment, making it clear that prospective buyers should be aware of these challenges.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, especially the GM performance intake, with @ThatCarGuy01 mentioning that they have been searching for one for years and could consider buying the truck just for that feature. @Dcassini3 (The Seller) has also received praise for keeping the vehicle updated, having recently replaced the purge solenoid and promising to send pictures of the instrument cluster soon. This proactive approach and commitment to maintenance have been well-received by potential buyers.
Neutral: Some users are asking practical questions regarding the vehicle's condition, such as @delz05 inquiring about any upcoming maintenance needs, including fluids and tire conditions. @Dcassini3 (The Seller) responded by confirming the tires are in good shape and provided receipts for the recent maintenance. The interactions display a balanced mix of curiosity and assurance regarding the state of the vehicle.
Negative: However, there was a minor concern regarding the check engine light related to the purge solenoid, which @Dcassini3 (The Seller) addressed by committing to its replacement. Users like @Zoro67gt expressed a straightforward suggestion for the seller to handle the replacement sooner rather than later. Overall, while the issue was acknowledged, it was not viewed as a significant setback, as the seller is actively working to resolve it.
![]() |
Single-Family-Owned 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK320 Cabriolet Designo Espresso Edition
WDBLK65GX1T079238
Lot 198137
Private Party
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @putter5864 expresses excitement about the striking color combination of the vehicle, stating it makes them 'wiggle' and mentions owning three vehicles with a similar interior. @JFitz717, the seller, contributes to the positive sentiment by declaring that the color combo is their favorite and emphasizes the car's originality, noting it has zero body or paint work and mentioning the garage-kept condition. @Sparrownaut adds to the praise by calling the colors beautiful, reinforcing the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle. Additionally, @hr47cars highlights the exceptional performance of the engine, recalling their own ownership of a similar model and asserting it was the best engine of its era.
Neutral: @rodneyallen asks a question about the initials painted on the door, which @JFitz717 clarifies are their grandmothers' initials and specifies they are vinyl and could be removed. @Script4 raises a point regarding the driver's window seal potentially causing operational issues, to which @JFitz717 responds, explaining the issue and confirming that all windows work perfectly if the door is slightly cracked. @rodneyallen also inquires about the car's driveability to another state, and @JFitz717 reassures that the car is in good running condition and recently passed a Pennsylvania state safety inspection.
Negative: @hr47cars suggests that including a driving video would have increased interest in the vehicle, indicating a missed opportunity for the seller. @skonker shares a mixed sentiment about the engine of a different model they owned, noting they preferred it better than the SL but acknowledged the appeal of this vehicle's interior. Overall, there seems to be some concern among potential buyers regarding minor operational issues and the lack of a driving video, hinting at uncertainty among some commenters.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Numerous comments highlight the vehicle's impressive aesthetics and craftsmanship. @Harvin praised the car's phenomenal appearance after seeing it in person, while @VTDavid expressed awe at the talent involved in such a build. @Gmmuscleusa noted that this Corvette stands out amongst typical C2s due to its good looks. The seller, @Viper5225, mentioned that the car is a work of art, particularly its tube frame and intricate details. Enthusiasts like @XXX79 and @Pettyfan43 also conveyed their admiration for the gorgeous look and design of the Grand Sport replica. @Viper5225 communicated the extensive effort and investment into the car, further elevating its appeal.
Neutral: Several comments focused on seeking more information about the vehicle, such as build specifics and performance capabilities. @ghoaglandjr and @Glenn930 both asked about the identity of the builder and the possibility of seeing driving videos, adding richness to the conversation about the vehicle’s potential uses. The comments reflected curiosity about its weight and whether it is suitable for the track or just a show car. @Viper5225 responded to multiple inquiries, providing details about the construction and engine specifications, including the stock LT4 engine and headers, confirming that these aspects were unchanged from their original design. Some users also expressed interest in the insurance process for modified vehicles like this one.
Negative: On the downside, some individuals noted skepticism regarding specific design elements. @Vct180 mentioned difficulties in accepting certain features like the truck fenders and trunk lid radiator design, suggesting that it might not be everyone's taste. Additionally, @4thAttempt's comment was flagged for being non-constructive, indicating not all feedback was positive or welcomed in the discussion. There was also a recurring theme of users wishing for more detailed information and better engagement from the seller to bolster confidence in the auction process.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GoBigBlue (The Seller) expresses a sense of nostalgia and enjoyment about the Land Cruiser, highlighting that it has been a lot of fun to own. @GoBigBlue also appreciates the compliments from others, especially noting the positive reactions he receives while driving, like waves and thumbs up. @Paddy_Mac shares a favorable opinion of the vehicle's color, indicating that the blue is one of his favorites, showing a shared enthusiasm for the Car's aesthetics.
Neutral: @Gregc123 brings up an important inquiry regarding the details of the replacement engine, indicating an interest in understanding more about the vehicle's condition and history. This suggests that not all comments are purely positive or negative, as potential buyers are considering practical aspects of the car.
Negative: @CaptRSJ humorously refers to the vehicle as a "gross polluter," indicating a negative perception regarding its environmental impact. This comment contrasts with the more positive views but hints at concerns that some potential buyers may have about the vehicle's emissions.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the BMW E90 Sedan, noting its low mileage and engaging driving experience. @casejam fondly recalled their experience with a similar model, highlighting it as a simple yet fun car that is often underrated. @BMWE90Guy remarked on the classy interior and suggested enhancements for a sportier feel, while @JakePM praised the build quality and aesthetics of the color combination, indicating a strong interest in the vehicle.
Neutral: There were inquiries about specific details of the vehicle, such as engine type and clutch performance. @jbr4th asked whether the car had the N51 or N52 engine, to which @aSingh39 (The Seller) confirmed it was equipped with the N52. @Zgt598 also inquired about the clutch engagement range, and @aSingh39 assured potential bidders that the clutch is in good condition, grabbing before the mid-range.
Negative: Concerns about additional fees were raised by @szabi, although @aSingh39 clarified that there would be no extra charges. The comments did not reveal significant negative remarks about the vehicle itself, but they reflect a cautious interest from potential buyers who are seeking transparency in the sale process.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its impressive features and overall appeal. @440belvedere expresses admiration for the combination of pedals and extra gears, which @svatem agrees is a fantastic aspect. @MikeDTaz calls it a 'nice dang car,' suggesting it has great restoration potential. @Rajunz praises it as an amazing car and wishes for wider rear tires, while @PDXBryan is intrigued by the engine and suspension modifications, hoping to learn more details. @racerman50 emphasizes the strong desire to own it, stating, 'WANT BADLY.' Additionally, @a410traveler appreciates the car's aesthetics and upgrades, calling it a perfect combination, and @Highrider deems it a fantastic daily driver that will turn heads. Overall, the commentary reflects enthusiasm for the vehicle's design and capabilities.
Neutral: Several commenters bring up specific technical aspects of the vehicle without strong positive or negative sentiments. @jcmac59 requests details on the horsepower rating of the 340 rebuild, while @fordfreakme is interested in rear end ratio and additional motor specifics. @ronsant questions the benefit of the non K frame front end and seeks information about the rear end gears. @Tikidavesue admires the build but expresses confusion regarding the chassis modifications, noting that they go against the traditional engineering practices of Mopar vehicles. @type14 responds by reassuring that the QA1 suspension designed for this Duster is engineered to handle the load appropriately, suggesting a level of confidence in the modifications.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns regarding the engineering and modifications of the vehicle, indicating apprehension for potential structural issues. @Valiantjim believes that the chassis modifications compromise the vehicle's integrity, referencing the expertise of Scott Harvey and his narrative on Mopar's design philosophy. Similarly, @Tikidavesue expresses skepticism about the shocks and springs' load management, indicating that the original design utilized torsion bars to distribute load more efficiently. Overall, while many comments are positive or neutral, there are critical voices questioning the vehicle's modifications and their impact on its classic architecture.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments praised the vehicle for its beauty and uniqueness. @boaboyoz described it as a 'magnificent Modena Yellow F355 Spider' and an 'exquisite example,' wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @1Dustman, who owns a similar model, expressed admiration for the ride quality, emphasizing the enchanting sound of the gated shifter. Enthusiasts like @milage and @latan43 shared a consensus on the striking appeal of the yellow color on Ferraris, particularly on the 355 model, highlighting its growing popularity.
Neutral: The seller, @dsd03, provided detailed responses to inquiries from potential buyers. They confirmed that the passenger side shield in the engine bay was missing and addressed questions regarding the condition of the paint and factory specifications. The seller stressed that the car is fully stock, with the original factory exhaust headers and a recent comprehensive service completed. They also attached importance to the car's low mileage and investment-grade status, while stating that the vehicle is available for viewing in Berkeley, CA.
Negative: However, some concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition. @Freemason inquired about the missing passenger side shield and the state of the passenger door, while @raykosh expressed doubts about the originality of the paint, noting inconsistent readings. @Freemason also asked for confirmation regarding potential damage to the front bumper. The seller acknowledged some potential issues with the paint, suggesting that the protection film might have led to varied readings and mentioned a subpar touch-up on the passenger side sill, indicating a need for better quality work in that area.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @PGCAT commented that the vehicle is a testament to proper maintenance, showcasing its ability to cover miles without compromising quality. @Euro_Classica mentioned that the 2014 Flying Spur, with its classic black exterior, is a well-maintained car that has recently undergone an oil and filter service, affirming its readiness for new ownership. @Nathanp.alpine expressed admiration for the car while wishing it wasn't located far away, highlighting that many love the car for its design and capabilities at its price point.
Neutral: @land_shark3 inquired about service records, indicating that he could not find documentation for the oil change since 2022, while @Rollinit suggested that the bidding looks low, hinting that there may be issues affecting the price. @PGCAT echoed feelings of admiration, questioning the reason behind the low bids for such a desirable vehicle. @MrMagoo2 noted that the car has many cosmetic needs and suggested that a detailed service record would boost confidence among potential buyers, indicating he sees potential despite the challenges.
Negative: @MrMagoo2 criticized the presentation of the vehicle, calling out multiple cosmetic issues that require attention, such as detailing and paint correction, which could deter bidders. He implied that the lack of detailed service records undermines trust in the car's maintenance history. In response, @Euro_Classica acknowledged the vehicle's imperfections but emphasized transparency and its great value, yet @MrMagoo2 maintained that without addressing the cosmetic issues, the bids reflect the real-world assessment of the car's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Bartlola highlights the van's ability to impress both cool and nerdy friends, suggesting it has broad appeal and style. This reflects positively on the vehicle's design and aesthetic value.
Neutral: @RPDrive inquires about the High Output (HO) engine, indicating that potential buyers are interested in the performance specifications. @edellavedova asks for a picture of the roof to assess modifications, showing practical considerations and the willingness of potential buyers to customize. Additionally, @cashiskey seeks information about the switch for spotlights, roof rack installation, and MPG estimates, pointing to a focus on functionality and efficiency.
Negative: @edellavedova expresses concern about the rear seats' removability, suggesting some potential buyers might be apprehensive about the vehicle's flexibility in terms of space. This could indicate a perception that the van may not suit all needs or uses. Furthermore, @cashiskey's inquiries about the roof rack fixture and miles per gallon estimate may imply some uncertainties regarding the vehicle's practical aspects.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @iamsuperchris expressed excitement about the possibility of winning the auction, indicating he would be proud to add this car to his collection. @kamikaziH2Omln shared a fondness for the vehicle, noting its uniqueness and potential classic status, even amidst challenges related to public perception. @ckcollectibles, the seller, provided clarity on the availability of the Current Amperage Capacity (CAC) for interested buyers, showing transparency and willingness to share important information regarding the car's performance.
Neutral: Several comments raised questions about the Tesla Roadster's battery status, with @MPawelek inquiring about the age of the original batteries and their charge capacity, while @fbueller0x1 and @iamsuperchris requested details on the current CAC value. @CTurtleS also sought clarification on the rims and CAC, indicating a common interest in understanding the vehicle's specifications as potential buyers. @sweetleon commented on the recent auction trends for similar vehicles, suggesting awareness of the fluctuating market.
Negative: @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 cautioned that the bottom of the price market for these cars is rapidly declining, referencing previous sales of solid examples that did not yield high bids. Additionally, @recellerate questioned whether this auction would lead to any meaningful outcome, hinting at skepticism regarding its potential success. Overall, there seemed to be concerns about the viability of investing in the vehicle amidst a declining market and brand reputation.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters shared positive sentiments about the vehicle, highlighting its shine and overall appearance. @Mongoose55 praised AEG Motorsports for their meticulous detailing, noting that the vehicle looked so shiny they initially mistook a reflection for a dent. Another comment displayed admiration for the car's stunning color, describing it as handsome and expressing interest in the auction. @bmdaia also found the auto stop-start button a surprising feature for the model, labeling it a beautiful rig and wishing luck with the auction.
Neutral: There were inquiries concerning certain features and the condition of the vehicle. @Bavaria911 asked about the apparent dents on the doors, while @zubinkhan94 requested additional photos of the driver's seat and dashboard discoloration. @FatDaddy2 inquired about maintenance records, and @Oldcoach asked about the power folding mirrors and potential trade-ins, suggesting a practical interest in the vehicle's capabilities.
Negative: A few comments reflected hesitation regarding the vehicle's interior, with @cesarmaz mentioning that a black interior would be ideal, stating that the current beige looked "vintage." Additionally, @garybres pointed out that the original warranty had likely expired and inquired about the warranty options available, hinting at concerns about future service costs. These aspects suggest a cautious optimism among some prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @84FLH expressed enthusiasm about the bike, referring to it as a nice ride and inquiring about the tour pak (trunk), showcasing a positive interest in its features. The conversation around the bike highlights a sense of nostalgia with @84FLH mentioning a connection to a similar model owned by a neighbor in the past. @GREG426, the seller, has confirmed that the bike runs and can move, suggesting reliability in its operation, which adds to the overall appeal of the vehicle.
Neutral: The comments indicate some practical inquiries about the bike's condition and history. @Chile67 raised important questions concerning the presence of the USEPA emissions sticker and the matching numbers for the frame and engine. Additionally, @1981shovel inquired about possible issues that could hinder flying in to retrieve the bike, specifically asking about the age of the tires. Such questions suggest active interest but also concern about reliability and safety, while not expressing strong positive or negative sentiments.
Negative: There are concerns regarding the bike's maintenance history, with @55solo questioning whether it can start and run after being inactive for about a decade. @GREG426 confirmed that its last ride was around 10-12 years ago, which raises potential issues about the bike's overall condition, particularly how well it has been preserved during this long period of inactivity. The lack of detailed maintenance information and the condition of critical components, such as tires, could create hesitation for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Miata91 describes the vehicle as a lot of fun, while @btrayn1 loves the build and expresses excitement for the sale. @M.Rhee finds the engine compartment to be spiffy, and @Rub87 compliments the 1997 model, asking about the power output and sharing their recent experience with a successful engine swap. @dupe is impressed with the vehicle's appearance and requests to see a picture with the headlights up, to which @Loolcom (The Seller) responds positively, promising to provide an image soon. @Peytonmanis believes the car is a fantastic upgrade and an absolute monster, echoing sentiments from other enthusiasts. @Loolcom (The Seller) also shares excitement about the car's power and includes a box of additional spares and goodies with the sale.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about aspects of the car’s performance and condition. @LiveMoore requests more information regarding a past damage report and the functionality of the AC, while also raising concerns about an oil leak mentioned in the vehicle description. @Dake asks about lifter noise, and @z06coop recommends checking the CAS for potential leaks. @Jerryteal711 is curious if the rubber gasket on the oil pan has ever been replaced. @Bjohnso4 observes potential uneven tire wear and suggests that a new owner should account for an alignment, highlighting the importance of checking the tread on all four tires. @Loolcom (The Seller) addresses these inquiries, detailing past work done and assuring enthusiasts that minor issues are manageable.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, there are concerns raised regarding certain aspects of the vehicle. @LiveMoore's request for more information about the oil leak and for details about the alleged damage on the CarFax raises red flags about the car's upkeep. @Dake's mention of lifter noise and the uncertainty surrounding the effectiveness of the AC might deter potential buyers, especially since @Loolcom (The Seller) acknowledges a minor issue with the oil leak, pointing to the valve cover and CAS as likely culprits. @Bjohnso4 expresses worries over uneven tire wear, suggesting it may indicate an alignment issue that could require attention before purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @bfoldy appreciates @BuggerOff's clarification regarding the frame dimensions, indicating that the response has improved understanding of the invoice details. The seller's engagement in addressing concerns demonstrates a commitment to transparency in the listing, which can build trust among potential buyers.
Neutral: @pretendgnome inquires about the vehicle's functionality, specifically asking if it drives and whether there are any videos available showcasing it in operation. This reflects a general interest in the practicality and performance of the vehicle, but does not provide a definitive view on quality or value.
Negative: There's some confusion around the frame specifications, with @bfoldy raising a concern that suggests potential miscommunication in the auction listing. @BuggerOff, however, reassures that the auction is for a standard width frame and not the wider option for a Coyote engine swap. Additionally, there's mention of mechanical issues, such as the seized brakes and the condition of the rear end, which may deter some buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @brettberk praises @JLAMA80s, noting their trustworthiness and attentive nature as a mechanic who works on vintage vehicles, encouraging potential buyers to bid and buy with confidence. @JLAMA80s offers clear and detailed information about the vehicle, including its title status and mechanical features, ensuring transparency and engaging with interested buyers by offering to provide additional photos and assistance.
Neutral: Several inquiries regarding specific features and conditions of the vehicle are raised, including questions about power steering from @Kalio, the availability of the soft top frame from @sxc, and the absence of AC confirmed by @Laronc01. @JLAMA80s responds to these queries while also providing updates on direct messages with @vazodnem, maintaining open communication with potential buyers and keeping the discussion going about technical details.
Negative: Concerns arise from @pjn_wyo, who highlights significant issues such as rust on the body, the condition of various mechanical components, and oil leaks, asking many pointed questions to ascertain the vehicle's state. @JLAMA80s responds candidly to these worries, detailing the extent of the rust, the integrity of the frame, the condition of the swivel balls, and offering insights on repairs needed, indicating the need for transparency in addressing the vehicle's condition despite the potential for additional costs.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @sdunsworth described the vehicle as a beautiful example, while @Bfishey also praised the impressive appearance by stating it was a beautiful 911T. @whittier4242 echoed these sentiments by calling it a very nice original Targa. The seller, @rowingone, confirmed the car's quality, noting it was rust-free and mostly original, with a few exceptions for updates. Moreover, @Lagrassa mentioned the very nice presentation of the vehicle, which was supported by their ownership of a similar model with comparable options.
Neutral: @rowingone (The Seller) provided considerable details about the car's specifications and options, including the production specs from Porsche, which list features like air conditioning, tinted glass, and upgraded components. The seller also addressed questions from users regarding changes made to the car, like the lack of fog lights or the status of the air conditioning system. @Ex-Jungle-Cruise-Skipper requested additional information about the non-operational A/C, indicating interest in the vehicle's condition and functionality.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding the car's stance, with @kaeferkaufer and @rebrewer commenting that it might be too low, which could affect handling negatively. @UOLDDOG pointed out a potential issue in the photos concerning what looked like a crack, which @rowingone clarified was only a casting flaw. Additionally, comments by @Maxwell077 about disregarding personal relationships for the car humorously highlighted a potential conflict between desires for the car and domestic life.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @chevyguy9906 believes the truck has potential and thinks it will do well if the right buyer sees it. @boaboyoz describes it as a "righteous red GMC truck" that has loads of practical potential, implying its versatility. Additionally, @MonteCutlass notes that the truck appears to be in excellent condition, suggesting it doesn’t seem to have been worked hard, which is further supported by the seller who mentions that it has been well-stored and maintained, emphasizing its like-new condition.
Neutral: @TRAVELL provides basic delivery information about the truck, while @newcarpro offers technical details including vehicle specifications such as the VIN and model type. @morrisminiman expresses curiosity about the truck's size dimensions, asking specific questions about the wheelbase and interior dimensions, which reflects an interest in the truck's suitability for various needs without imparting a strong opinion.
Negative: @jpf1301 raises a concern that although the truck seems fit for rescue missions, it may be priced out of reach for many small-town fire departments. @mrr asks about the truck's backstory, indicating a potential hesitation about its history. @Crawldaddy inquires whether the tires are original or replacements, suggesting he's cautious about the truck's maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Rhayner admires the stunning appearance of the white car, despite a general preference against white vehicles. @jb9573 highlights that the car comes equipped with everything needed, detailing its features including a leather interior and sport suspension. @midunn appreciates the car's aesthetics and sound, indicating strong visuals and auditory satisfaction upon driving it. Moreover, @Williamdoran (The Seller) shares his enthusiasm about the Cayman GTS, stating it surpasses his previous Porsche models in torque, horsepower, and driving experience, while also noting it has great daily driver amenities.
Neutral: @Lordbobbington provides clarification on the hardback sport bucket seats, describing their limited adjustability with only an electric seat back recline, while @larrib mentions it resembles manual Sport Plus seats but can possibly be fitted with lumbar support. Questions about faults and liens are raised by @midunn and @immortalkingdom, to which @Williamdoran (The Seller) responds that there has been no recurring fault since service, although he cannot disclose lien amounts due to BAT policy.
Negative: Concerns about potential damage are raised by @ahessla, who inquires about any photos of damage and the condition of the interior. @CBRacerX asks if the car was smoked in, and @UOENO notes the absence of the Bose sound system and Bluetooth capabilities, expressing disappointment over their lack considering the car's pricing. @2015GTS corrects @Williamdoran on the standard inclusion of Porsche Torque Vectoring, pointing out possible misinformation regarding the build specification.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters praise the vehicle for its potential and aesthetic appeal. @soquelz considers it a great start to a beautiful Z, while @OldZzz notes its rarity and historical significance as one of the first factory AC Z cars, highlighting its low production numbers. Further, @JeffRibeiro (The Seller) assures buyers about the vehicle's original features and condition, which includes working gauges and a cold AC system, along with spare parts that add value to the sale.
Neutral: Some comments are focused on the vehicle’s specifics, including potential modifications and original features. @Mazdaseeker raises a question about the lifted appearance of the car, while @GTEASER requests pictures of the engine number. @sestv1138 inquires about the AC and heat functionality, which @JeffRibeiro clarifies in detail, providing reassurance about the car's systems. Additionally, @glemon discusses tire size comparisons and the overall ride comfort, which does not detract from the appreciation of the vehicle.
Negative: While the overall reception is positive, there are some critiques, particularly regarding the vehicle's appearance and modifications. @lewisfoto suggests that the original color should have been maintained rather than painting the engine bay, indicating concerns about aesthetic choices. @shydiggs asks if the seller is willing to negotiate on transport, highlighting a practical consideration, while @Mazdaseeker questions the need for lifting the car, suggesting it could detract from its beauty.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @bosshoss3406pack admires the beauty of the 1957 Thunderbird, noting it as an exceptional example of the best year for this model. He expresses gratitude towards @ExclusiveMotorClub for presenting the vehicle and wishes everyone good luck with the auction. @boaboyoz calls it a charming representation and wishes the sellers luck, while @GeoWH appreciates the vehicle's resale red color, suggesting it is an attractive choice for bidders.
Neutral: @p-38 raises some questions regarding the interior color scheme and the original colors, asking for details about the actual mileage and restoration work done. @gocorcoran responds, indicating that the colors can be found in the description and suggests that there could be lighting issues affecting the appearance of the seats and dash. @ExclusiveMotorClub, the seller, confirms the original restoration details while answering the inquiries, stating that the integrity of the vehicle remains strong even in high temperatures.
Negative: @FighterGuy points out a misalignment issue with the gas cap door, questioning whether this is something that can be easily fixed. Similarly, @Jim_Christian comments on the crooked fit of the fuel filler door, comparing it to a crooked tooth, and seeks confirmation on the absence of additional soft top options. @Voxtron expresses concern over the inconsistent interior colors, speculating that the door panels do not match the other seating and armrest areas, indicating a potential point for further enhancement in the car's overall presentation.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle's aesthetics, specifically noting the "nice flowing body contours" typical of the XK lineage. Additionally, @MNMMNM expressed admiration for the car, referring to it as a "great car" and contemplating whether they might need two. The seller, @AlecF47075, also highlighted the inclusion of the original vinyl snap-down cover for the top, enhancing the car's appearance when the top is down. The recent updates regarding tire replacements were acknowledged positively as well, indicating proactive maintenance.
Neutral: Some comments focused on the car's registration as a classic vehicle, raising questions about its categorization given its 2001 build date. @lhaag inquired about the possibility of viewing the car in person and the availability of repair receipts while acknowledging that a title is not strictly necessary in Connecticut. The seller, @AlecF47075, confirmed the presence of a previous NYS title and added that some visual materials, like a video demonstration of the convertible top in operation, have been provided to potential buyers, although background noise from a neighbor was noted.
Negative: On the negative front, there were concerns raised regarding the vehicle's history and condition. Several users, including @MNMMNM and @66F100, queried about the replacement status of critical components like the cam chain tensioners and the presence of any evidence of prior accidents. @AJagGuy remarked on an intermittent noise from the exhaust system, questioning whether it affects engine performance, to which @AlecF47075 clarified that it does not impact the car's overall operation. Questions about the parking sensor's functionality and how many keys are available also indicated a level of apprehension regarding the vehicle's condition and maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @RKGUIDO commented on the lovely color combination of the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @VintagePete expressed his admiration for the beauty of the D B9, and @Mazdaseeker agreed, calling it a beautiful car. @ScottNThompson also found the car stunning, noting that the seats looked great from his perspective. Additionally, @blackjags praised the subtle beauty of the color combination, indicating it was well thought out.
Neutral: @mgd suggested checking out the walk-around video that features the car top down, which may provide further insight into its condition. @wmw21 provided a technical perspective on the leather's condition, suggesting over-conditioning can lead to structural issues, which aligns with @Mazdaseeker's note of degraded leather. @Eurocarsnob21 inquired about the neighborhood where the video's shot, showing interest in both the car and its surroundings. @touchyu2 appreciated the car's condition and asked about the engine's design origins.
Negative: @TheBull pointed out the lack of full car photos with the top down, which may detract from the overall presentation. @dross9 commented that the driving video seemed listless, and @Srecko echoed this sentiment by stating he fell asleep during the driving video. Additionally, @Srecko brought up concerns regarding the leather, suggesting it had foam backing that can degrade over time, potentially requiring costly repairs to restore.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Numerous commenters expressed admiration for the 1986 Jeep CJ-7 Renegade, highlighting its beautiful design and impressive condition. @rdnk007 simply stated, "Beautiful!", while @Caltoolidge emphasized the rarity of the vehicle by calling it a "jewel." Other users, such as @Chase68, praised its unique features, including the Dana 44 rear axle and Howell fuel injection upgrade, celebrating it as a compelling and well-sorted classic that is ready for road adventures. The seller, @1600veloce, received commendations for offering detailed listings and photographs, further showcasing their dedication to providing high-quality vehicles.
Neutral: The comments also included a variety of observations and inquiries. @gkbdvm raised a question about a red light at the base of the steering column, seeking clarification on whether it was a check engine light, which @1600veloce confirmed it is related to the Howell fuel injection system. Additionally, @tugedge pointed out that while the Jeep is visually stunning, it does not maintain 100% originality since some components, like the base seats, are from an earlier model year. This commentary reflects a balanced approach to evaluating the vehicle's quality and enhancements.
Negative: Conversely, there were some negative remarks concerning the vehicle's originality and the seller's practices. User @amarcionek suggested that @1600veloce is capitalizing on the demand by rapidly listing similar vehicles, implying a possible approach of using classic vehicles as mere investments. @tugedge noted modifications that detracted from the Jeep's originality, signaling that not all details align with what collectors might expect. Furthermore, @GLINKA referenced a previous sale price for the Jeep, suggesting that the current asking price, when factoring in additional costs incurred, might be inflated, hinting at possible skepticism about the vehicle's current value.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is highly regarded for its performance and sleek appearance. Commenters like @D2_S8_Daily noted that the upgrades from the 2007 to the 2008 model included a more reliable hydraulic suspension and a horsepower increase, contributing to an exhilarating driving experience. The seller, @usjepecl, also highlighted the vehicle's performance enhancements and aesthetic improvements that have made it a favorite among owners. Other users appreciated the cleanliness of the car and praised its impeccable driving qualities, indicating strong overall enthusiasm for the model.
Neutral: There were inquiries about specific features and details related to the vehicle's condition and service history. @VTBenz asked about the service records and the maintenance of the Active Body Control fluid, noting the importance of complete service documentation. Additionally, users discussed minor discrepancies regarding the interior trim, with inquiries into whether the original carbon fiber was replaced with wood trim, showcasing a continued interest in ensuring the car's specifications match its listing.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the lack of service records prior to the seller's ownership, as mentioned by @VTBenz, which could affect potential buyers' confidence in the vehicle's maintenance history. @koblesCar and @Thunderuppaul expressed doubt about the car's functionality, particularly regarding the Keyless Go feature, raising questions about its operational integrity. Additionally, comments from @gjguenti and @flyconstant highlighted potential issues with the car's cosmetic details, such as the presence of front license plate holes and confusion over the interior trim, which could detract from the car's overall appeal.
![]() |
Cummins 5.9L-Powered 2008 Ford F-250 Super Duty FX4 Crew Cab 4×4
1FTSW21RX8EA41377
Lot 198171
Dealer
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The 2008 Ford F-250 features an impressive 12 Valve Cummins conversion, which has received praise for its powerful setup, including a 5R110W Ford transmission adapted to deliver optimal performance. The seller, @TTI (The Seller), mentions that the truck is equipped with aftermarket enhancements such as an upgraded turbo and high-performance injectors, contributing to an estimated horsepower of over 650. Many commenters, including @Mongoose55 and @CoolCustomsGarage, appreciate the engineering effort behind the modifications, considering it a significant improvement over the original engine. The truck's aesthetic appeal was also highlighted, with one user commenting on its clean appearance and well-executed lift and wheel setup.
Neutral: Some of the comments express inquiries about the vehicle's history and technical specifications, such as the engine's mileage and the reason for choosing a 12 Valve Cummins over a 24 Valve engine. @BravoSeirra and @TTI (The Seller) provided details on the bonded title and the potential for it to become a clean title after the required time, which could be important for buyers in specific states. Other commenters are curious about the practical aspects of the truck, like its towing capacity and whether it could be driven reliably between cities, as noted by @spettiford and @27maverick, showing a mix of interest in the truck's performance and legal status.
Negative: On the downside, there are concerns raised about the truck's build quality and performance, particularly regarding the visible fuel line potentially hanging down and the high levels of smoke during startup, discussed by users like @KD93 and @27maverick. Some potential buyers are apprehensive about the vehicle's tuning and power, with comments questioning whether it can tow effectively and if it has adequate gauge monitoring for performance. Additionally, @Toro69 expressed concerns over emissions and the potential challenges with the bonded title, indicating that for some buyers, these issues might raise red flags.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @hcconsultant praised the S550 as a great vehicle, mentioning their positive experience with a previous model. @Porschedriver described the car as great despite issues with the insurance description of damage and high servicing costs, noting the quality of repairs done on the vehicle. @2SelltheBenz (The Seller) shared that the car's interior is in good condition, the massage and dynamic seats are fully functional, and all maintenance is up to date, reinforcing the overall appeal of the car.
Neutral: Several commentors, including @rocousa and @Mmade22, asked questions about roof damage, undercarriage condition, and requested additional pictures and videos of the vehicle to provide more insight into its status. @MomEof3 and @RDM7533 also inquired about specific features like the original windshield and the date codes on the tires. @mkeller0493 expressed interest in viewing the car in person, indicating possible serious buyers willing to inspect it thoroughly before making a decision.
Negative: @Porschedriver shared a negative experience with a previous Mercedes-Benz vehicle, citing significant reliability issues that made them hesitant to purchase another. @Mmade22 raised concerns about the condition of northern cars due to harsh winters, reflecting the importance of thorough inspection to avoid potential hidden issues. Additionally, @Squirreledmny pointed out a potential problem with the parking sensor, raising doubts about the car's functionality.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the beautiful Panther Black color of the 2024 Camaro 2SS Convertible, with @Crovet expressing admiration for how it looks in studio shots. @Prescott_Collection (The Seller) confirms that the color is even more stunning outdoors, particularly with the metal flake that adds a unique flair. Overall, there is a sense of enthusiasm about the vehicle's aesthetic, suggesting it will stand out both in photographs and on the road.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in casual conversation regarding the vehicle, with @Brad1187 anticipating @newcarpro's presence in the discussion. Questions about the car’s features arise, like @Supramkv inquiring about paint protection film and @michaelmm seeking clarification on the desaturated images. @AkitaNo1 shares a personal viewpoint regarding the car's design options, noting the flat black mirrors and comparing it to a previous model, adding an interesting perspective to the dialogue without a strong bias.
Negative: Some remarks suggest a lack of completeness in the vehicle's presentation, such as @Supramkv asking about the absence of paint protection film. @michaelmm questions the quality of the photos, implying that the desaturated images do not accurately represent the car's appeal. Additionally, @AkitaNo1 criticizes the choice of features like the black mirrors and suggests that black wheels would have been a better option, reflecting a degree of disappointment in certain design decisions.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a great deal of enthusiasm for the 2001 BMW Z3 from potential buyers, with many expressing interest in the vehicle's classic characteristics and unique design. @Collectibleclassics highlights the car as a pure and simple roadster, emphasizing its front-engine, rear-wheel-drive layout, which appeals to driving enthusiasts. The reassurance of the seller's excellent reputation, backed by hundreds of 5-star reviews, has likely contributed to buyer confidence in the transaction process and the quality of the vehicle.
Neutral: One commenter, @Sunbird77, inquired about the condition of the vehicle's soft top, showing a general curiosity about specifics before potentially making a purchase. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, promptly addressed this question, indicating that the soft top is in good condition and does not require replacement. This interaction demonstrates a level of transparency in communication, which can be valuable for prospective buyers seeking detailed information about the car's condition.
Negative: There are limited negative comments in this discussion, with @Sunbird77 only asking about the rear window's potential need for replacement, hinting at concerns over the car's overall condition. However, the seller's timely responses suggest that they are prepared to address any queries or doubts from buyers, which could alleviate uncertainties about the vehicle. Thus far, no direct negative feedback on the vehicle itself has been noted, indicating a generally positive perception among commenters.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Hoppy18 notes that the GT of this era is a subject of much debate and appears to appreciate the vehicle, calling it a "gold nugget" that will perform well. @mlesko73 agrees and compliments @JJF1 on being well-prepared with video evidence, indicating a positive outlook on the car's condition. Several comments, including from @kevin1976, express admiration for the car's appearance and color combination, with @bbcarguys asserting that the car displays proof of being a real GT, highlighting specific details like the brake line support bracket as verification. Overall, the vehicle garners significant praise for its aesthetics and condition.Comments are made that focus on seeking additional information rather than expressing strong opinions one way or another. @bcdbat inquires about the vehicle's history related to the odometer and whether it features a power top, which @JJF1 clarifies it does not. @VintageBuff asks why the car is being sold so soon after purchase, suggesting some curiosity about the seller's motives. @Rick_S and others also raise technical questions regarding the vehicle's specifications and features, indicating a neutral interest in verifying facts rather than expressing strong opinions. On the negative side, @rowdy raises concerns about the validity of the GT status, questioning the authenticity of the data plate and other identifiers. @Gas5757 points out that a genuine GT must have a specific code in the VIN number, and this prompts further scrutiny from others, including @TexasStable. Some comments express skepticism about the seller’s willingness to provide further details, as @Classickcarbuyer mentions not receiving responses to their inquiries about reinforcement plates, and @JJF1 insists on transparency. Although the overall sentiment is mostly positive, these comments illustrate a level of doubt and insistence on more detailed evidence regarding the vehicle's authenticity and condition.
Neutral:
Negative:
![]() |
36-Years-Owned 1988 Chevrolet Corvette Coupe 35th Anniversary Edition
1G1YY2185J5114620
Lot 198141
Private Party
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @bobusn described the C4 as a nice-looking vehicle, showing appreciation for its appearance. @Kaz791 echoed this sentiment by calling the C4 beautiful, further highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @vincelopresti complimented a custom jacket associated with the vehicle, indicating additional positive associations with the seller's style.
Neutral: @Pmusgerg inquired about the vehicle's recent smog testing, which suggests a basic level of interest but no strong feelings toward the vehicle itself. @bobusn thanked @Katmando16 for the additional pictures of the interior, indicating engagement with the seller that does not lean heavily towards positivity or negativity.
Negative: @Pmusgerg's comment about the smog test hints at a concern regarding the vehicle's compliance or readiness for road use, which could suggest skepticism among potential buyers. There are no outright negative comments present, but the inquiry about smog testing may imply a cautious stance on the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @2002WS6 shared positive sentiments about the 2002 model, expressing fond memories of its driving experience; he loved how well it handled. @mo8ius also echoed excitement, mentioning he'd love to use this vehicle as a daily driver. @Classichondaman noted he typically prefers 3rd gen Preludes but is warming up to the 5th gen, considering it one of the best handling models. Additionally, @edog13 praised the fun factor of the driving experience and the overall worth of the 5th gen Preludes despite some concerns regarding the ATTS system.
Neutral: Comments discussed various aspects of the vehicle, particularly its condition. @cwhitt (The Seller) indicated that he would try to record an occasional clunk sound, hinting at some minor issues. There was also a mention of potentially doing a pre-inspection to diagnose the source of the intermittent clunking noise, with @litespeed1 asking for specifics on when the noise occurs. @cwhitt (The Seller) provided details on the car's clutch replacement history and shared video evidence to demonstrate the car's driving function, which were neutral observations appearing to maintain transparency about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the potential costs associated with maintenance, specifically regarding the clutch and timing belt. @Jeronomo pointed out that only the clutch master and slave cylinders had been replaced, suggesting the actual clutch replacement may be more labor-intensive. @azclassics shared anxieties about the original timing belt, implying that if the timing belt needed to be replaced alongside the clutch, it would become an expensive task. These comments reflected apprehensions about ongoing repair needs and maintenance costs that future buyers might face.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @jdemps3 mentioned that it’s a great truck and asked several questions about its operation, indicating interest in its performance. @Grootie55_ (The Seller) confirmed that the truck runs extremely well and sounds even better, noting that it has been a reliable daily driver. The seller also addressed concerns about driving it on the highway, asserting that it has handled long trips without issues.
Neutral: @jmporsche944 and @Molae65 requested additional information about the AC and original door panels, showing curiosity about the vehicle's condition. @FW_BRONC made comments regarding its original color and suggested that a picture of the door jam sticker would provide valuable insight to prospective buyers. @Grootie55_ (The Seller) responded to these inquiries with honest updates about the vehicle's modifications and existing components.
Negative: @jsloden pointed out that the front seat armrests were removed during the seat recovery process, which could concern potential buyers about the vehicle's completeness. @wardserik98 raised questions about potential leaks in the rear differential and the condition of the headliner, indicating concerns about the vehicle's physical integrity. Additionally, @Laronc01 questioned the specifics of the quote for repairing the AC, suggesting uncertainty about the service needed.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @1987BMW has shared a touching backstory about their beautiful 1987 BMW, inherited from a late father-in-law who cherished the car for over 27 years. The vehicle's stunning original red color and low mileage under 60,000 miles make it a rare find, especially for collectors and BMW enthusiasts. Commenters like @Flatman73 appreciate the unique color choice, and @maw06 expresses sympathy for the seller's loss while complimenting the classic nature of the car. Others, such as @goshi, note the vibrant Cinnabar red and express excitement about the car's potential value if it had the original wheels. The seller is optimistic about its future, emphasizing it deserves a good home and a passionate new owner.
Neutral: Several commenters have posed questions regarding the car's condition and functionality. @Rudi2 inquired about the A/C system, the operation of the windows, and potential underbody corrosion. The seller confirmed that the A/C blows cold and the windows operate smoothly, while they mentioned some surface rust that is cosmetic rather than structural. Questions about the spare tire, timing belt maintenance, and overall maintenance records also came up, with @goshi suggesting that the timing belt should be replaced immediately due to the uncertainty of the service history, emphasizing the necessity of a thorough inspection for any potential buyer.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's condition, contrasting the seller's narrative. @SFMor911 pointed out potential issues with corrosion and cleanliness, questioning how this aligns with the car's story. Similarly, @Jkivy and @BloodyHell noted discrepancies in factory specifications regarding parts like the front spoiler and wheel type, suggesting the car might not be in original condition. @2mAn echoed caution, expressing that without the correct parts and service history, it might underperform in the auction due to its altered aesthetics. Overall, there seems to be skepticism about the vehicle's condition despite its appealing history.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Roadrunner_CT exclaimed about the turbo wheels, calling them phenomenal, showcasing the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle. @Secretariat19 expressed enthusiasm with a simple yet effective 'HOT!!!', reflecting excitement about the car's design. @ROGUE.J noted the rarity of the model, making flattering remarks about the car while wishing the seller good luck with the auction. The owner, @mikelaca, took pride in their meticulous maintenance and upgrades, relating experiences that painted the car as an exceptional daily driver and visually appealing due to thoughtful touches, such as the professional window tinting and the high-quality interior features.
Neutral: @Zand4re (The Seller) provided helpful logistical information for interested buyers, inviting local viewers to arrange viewings and offering comprehensive details about the car's maintenance history and features. He reassured prospective bidders that regular updates, photos, and specifics about the vehicle’s condition would be shared throughout the auction process, inviting further questions. @mikelaca emphasized his car care routines, including using premium fuel and maintaining service schedules, adding a layer of transparency about its mechanical integrity.
Negative: Although the comments were predominantly positive, there was a slight indication of readiness for inquiries about the car. @botson brought up technical questions regarding the head unit and any warning lights, showing some buyers' concern about confirmatory details before making a decision. @mikelaca responded to dispel these concerns, stating that no error codes had appeared, hence reinforcing the vehicle's reliability. This highlights a common perception among potential buyers focused on ensuring the quality and serviceability of a used vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, emphasizing its beauty and desirability. @OllieBrowwn remarked on the car's gorgeous appearance, and @newcarpro described it as a beautiful Vette. @Dickson8829 shared fond memories of owning a similar model, calling it a "head turner" and a great daily driver. Additionally, @Noisyboyz highlighted the changing perceptions regarding automatic transmissions, noting that a powerglide coupe is increasingly viewed as comfortable and reliable. @Barnesee and @willie2323 also praised the 64 model, with @willie2323 observing impressive early bids for the well-optioned automatic C2.
Neutral: Several comments were more informational, with users asking specific questions about the car's condition and history. For instance, @RAPGuy inquired about carbon deposits on the rear bumper, while @Moelarrythecheese and @drdabdul raised questions about the hood fit and drum brakes, respectively. @Cdl6869 (The Seller) responded to these inquiries, discussing past repairs and maintenance performed on the vehicle along with clarifications about features such as the AC unit and braking system. The seller also addressed questions regarding the car's paint and damage history, indicating that most of it had been repainted and that there was no evidence of significant issues.
Negative: While the overall sentiment was positive, some comments raised concerns about potential issues. @Zonkerman noted an observation regarding the AC unit appearing to hang down underneath the glove box, prompting further clarification from the seller. @Moelarrythecheese mentioned possible gaps with the hood when viewed from the side, suggesting it could be related to past repairs. Additionally, @Barnesee sought information about prior front-end damage, asking for elaboration on its significance. Concerns about the braking system's performance compared to modern standards were also highlighted, but overall, these negative comments were more inquiries than outright criticisms.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments praise the stunning condition and color of the Porsche Targa 4S. @AliBabatheDon mentions that the car is perfect apart from missing extended leather and sport chrono, while @kni7fer describes it as a gem. @jorruss expresses excitement over the car's clean appearance, rarity, and perfect manual gearbox, calling it a 'unicorn.' The overall consensus is one of admiration, with many noting the charming color, particularly @exbrit's comment about how lovely the color looks with the chromed targa roof details. Additionally, @AlmostThere99 appreciates the quality of the photos, stating they make the colors pop.
Neutral: Several comments were focused on the representation of the car's color in the photos. @porschegoesfirst finds the vehicle's spec to be ideal, though it may exceed their budget, while @Ladon23 notes the absence of the Sport Chrono package as surprising given the options available on the model. @Grandturismo mentions the variability in color representation, suggesting that potential buyers should do more research to understand the true appearance of the vehicle. @911r (The Seller) reassures that the photos depict the car accurately, referring to their reputation and previous positive sales, thereby attempting to clarify the concern regarding photographic presentations.
Negative: There are some concerns voiced about the accuracy of the photos and the car's representation. @staceybsnyder mentions that the photos make the car look fake, while @G-Dub observes a significant color difference between current and previous auction photos, expressing a preference for the latter. @wizard11 agrees that the color seems misrepresented. @Lodgeskins raises questions about the condition of the bumper from previous license plate mounts, indicating potential repairs that might not have been disclosed. Overall, these comments reflect reservations regarding how the car is presented, with some commenters calling for more genuine and transparent photography.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the F-100 as "outrageous" and praises the build, expressing enthusiasm with comments like "Straight cash, homies" and ending with thumbs-up emojis. @mlesko73 calls it a "beast" and praises the great build, while @GuyGemmer expresses a strong desire to own the truck, though he is hesitant about the import process. @Piros1 thinks the truck is very nice, and @Etchhead admires the build, asking about the current landscape of importing such vehicles to the US.
Neutral: @lefthander (The Seller) responds to various inquiries, mentioning that he used a company called Border Buddy's for the truck's import to Canada and intends to gather more information regarding tariffs on importing to the US. He also addresses @JBrown08's question about viewing the truck and acknowledges issues with video quality on the listings. @BaerBronco shares excitement about the truck's potential performance, while @Bfisky2000 inquires about tariffs and video quality, and @71f100 asks specifically about the aluminum radiator.
Negative: @kshaw criticizes the videos associated with the truck, stating they sound like they're recorded inside a waterfall. @lefthander (The Seller) agrees with this assessment and indicates he will look into making improvements. There is also a mention of uncertainty regarding tariff classifications, with @lefthander expressing that it may require further research, leaving some potential buyers feeling unclear about the import process.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @wh400 appreciates the aesthetics of German wagons, especially noting VW's impressive designs. @Spider_Mike echoes this sentiment, recounting a friend's positive experience with comfort and sporty handling in a similar vehicle. Additionally, @A7534 finds that the car's color combination is even more appealing in person than in the photos, further enhancing its attractiveness.
Neutral: @aSingh39 (The Seller) provides key information about the Passat Wagon. They clarify that it does not come with a backup camera or factory GPS, as confirmed in responses to questions from @DAVIDMC100 and @billeldridge. The seller emphasizes the wagon's low mileage and invites potential bidders to ask questions, promoting an engaging auction environment.
Negative: @classicguy57 raises concerns about visible scratches and nicks, suggesting that these imperfections could affect potential buyers' decisions. Furthermore, @Tjobbitt inquires about the tires and their condition, indicating a cautious approach to making a purchase. Overall, while the car has positive attributes, some commenters express apprehensions based on its physical condition and the need for maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the car's beauty and design. @Pat1usmc notes the car's aesthetics after watching a review, while @GDogg enthusiastically describes its color combination and luxurious features. @PontiacNut praises the stunning color combination, adding to the general appreciation for the vehicle's appearance. Additionally, @RichBrit considers it the nicest Corniche he has seen, highlighting its elegance and classic look. Commenters also express interest in specific features that make this Rolls-Royce unique, with @rollsroyce sharing fond memories of its special order details and modifications.
Neutral: The seller, @fiminod, engages actively with potential buyers and other commenters. They mention sharing additional documents like the build sheet that designates special features of the car and address inquiries about its condition and history. Comments like @gregorylv's request for upholstery information and @srd6 's inquiry about the electronic condition of the vehicle show a supportive interaction between the seller and interested parties. @fiminod also acknowledges specific requests and offers to provide more details in due time, indicating a collaborative atmosphere in the discussion.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and specific features. @srd6 questions the rear seat leather’s appearance, mentioning possible damage, while also probing about functionality tests for various electronics. There is also curiosity regarding the missing original radio, which @rollsroyce notes has been replaced. Concerns about the availability of documentation and the clarity of detailed specifics are evident, as observers express their desire for transparency regarding the car's modifications and original specifications.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight the care and enthusiasm that @RDW01 (The Seller) has for the 2015 Z28. @griffbl expressed admiration for its overall appearance and authenticity, while @Gmmuscleusa appreciated that it had been driven on track days, indicating a good balance between use and preservation. Other commenters, such as @zipdang, also noted the significance of the vehicle's history and rarity, emphasizing the importance of actively driving these cars over merely preserving them as collector’s items.
Neutral: Several comments seek additional information about the car's condition and specifics. @bcoopes inquired about a clearer video of a dent on the rear bumper, reflecting a common request for transparency in listings. @CCase raised a question about the vehicle's expired registration, while @windupman and @MS3DALE asked about paint readings and previous battery information, indicating they need more technical insights before deciding on a purchase. @RDW01 (The Seller) responded promptly to these queries, maintaining open communication with potential buyers.
Negative: However, there were also concerns raised about the car's performance, notably from @griffbl, who referenced a low battery issue during startup. @diamondmotorworks asked about difficulties starting the car when hot, indicating potential mechanical concerns. @MS3DALE noted that the current battery is not original, possibly raising questions about maintenance quality. Overall, while many were excited about the vehicle, there were notable hesitations regarding its mechanical state and upkeep.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @rqhogen (The Seller) mentions that the car is in amazing condition for its age, having been garaged and receiving maintenance such as new tires, an alternator replacement, and a muffler hanger. The seller seems committed to providing information about the car's service history, stating that oil changes were recently performed and also confirming that several service records are available. They express their intention to check and verify the functionality of the A/C and antenna.
Neutral: @jeffs3820 and @Boulderman are seeking clarification on specific issues, such as the operation of the A/C and power antenna, and the history of service records. There are requests for more detailed photos of service documentation and for a video demonstrating the power antenna's functionality. The seller has acknowledged these requests and has provided some context about the car's previous ownership and service history.
Negative: @Boulderman expresses concern that the seller does not have an adequate understanding of the car's history and hints at a lack of thorough servicing, suggesting that the car may not achieve the expected longevity without proper care. They request additional efforts from the seller to demonstrate the working condition of the A/C and antenna, implying dissatisfaction with the current state of information provided. @jeffs3820 also points out that the current photo evidence of service records is insufficient to derive a comprehensive service history.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Alan91 (The Seller) expressed optimism about the sale, mentioning a desire for a great result. Additionally, @Alan91 (The Seller) clarified that the vehicle was purchased new and has never allowed smoking inside, which is a positive point for potential buyers concerned about odors and cleanliness.
Neutral: @HJSafari inquired about the possibility of an extended warranty, while @jbnair asked if any warranty is available on the car, indicating interest in the vehicle's coverage. @Toddh03 and @oxfield1 also sought confirmation on whether there had been pets or smoking in the car, along with warranty details, which suggests cautious interest from potential bidders looking for assurance before placing bids.
Negative: @Vpippolito raised concerns about whether the vehicle had been occupied by smokers or pets, reflecting hesitation on the condition of the vehicle. @clean_machina implied doubts about the existence of any remaining warranty due to the car's in-service date, while @DD916's question about the tire condition hints at a need for further information before proceeding with bids.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic and nostalgic value. @litespeed1 calls it a 'beauty' and @RedRon shares fond memories of riding similar bikes on California highways, highlighting the bike's iconic design. @whtmex reminisces about the reliability and performance of the bike from the 90s, describing it as 'super reliable and super smooth.' Others like @LelandKaty and @MotoMike also praise the rideability and Honda's reliability, reinforcing the enjoyment and positive experiences owners have had with this model.
Neutral: Numerous comments inquire about specific aspects of the bike or share related experiences, contributing to a mixed discourse. @michaelzarmory requests a run video, while @tjreganrx asks for clarification on the fairing damage, illustrating potential buyers' concerns about condition. @jlove0120 even offers additional parts, which indicates there's an active interest in maintaining or enhancing the bike's value. The seller, @BidRunner, engages with these inquiries by providing additional information and confirms the bike's history and current condition, showcasing transparency.
Negative: Despite the enthusiasm for the bike, there are some underlying concerns reflected in the comments. @tjreganrx's inquiry about fairing damage indicates potential issues that might deter buyers. @Knuckles-R-Busted raises a point about the loss of original parts and their future collectability, suggesting a cautionary perspective. Additionally, @eric.ames's concern regarding transportation condition hints at larger apprehensions about the sale process, indicating that potential buyers may have reservations that could impact their decision-making.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments reveal a strong appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic, particularly its striking silver color. @TR68 commented on the 'gorgeous color', while @calisomb described it as a super example of a rare 80s Ferrari and expressed enthusiasm about its performance potential. @Dinolover18 endorsed the car's visual appeal from personal experience, labeling it 'stunning inside and out'. Other users like @johnnyb11 and @krazydog joined in the admiration, reinforcing the consensus that it is a beautiful machine, not often seen in such a non-traditional color. @waltgrace remarked on the car being an 'epic example' from an epic seller, further emphasizing its quality.
Neutral: Several comments also brought up logistical concerns regarding the vehicle's history and current condition. @michaelp1usa raised questions about operational status, potential accidents, and service details, showcasing a common interest in the car's past. @scuderia110 (The Seller) responded to these inquiries with reassurance about the car's excellent maintenance and a comprehensive service history dating back to 1985. They also offered to provide additional documentation and photos upon request, highlighting their willingness to facilitate the sale process and address potential buyers' concerns.
Negative: On a more critical note, some comments indicated dissatisfaction with specific aspects of the presentation. @Knuckles-R-Busted expressed a preference for different photo angles, particularly criticizing the choice of a headlights-up shot as unappealing. Additionally, @AML1 noted that the background in the photos detracted from the car's color, which may impact viewer perception. Others like @57vettefuelie pointed out a missed opportunity for a driving video, indicating that further visual content could enhance interest and transparency about the car's performance.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters, including @Baddogdesmo and @morganplus8, agree that the Bonneville is a strikingly beautiful classic bike, describing it as a "Holy Grail" of motorcycles. @ForzaCarCompanyPA, the seller, highlights the bike's rich history, stating it has remained in the same family since its purchase due to a tragic story from the Vietnam War era. This narrative enhances the bike's desirability, with @adbuch and others emphasizing its remarkable preservation as a key selling point.
Neutral: Several participants are keen to confirm the original condition of the motorcycle. @Ben_stevens inquiries about the authenticity of the paint and mileage, while @ROJ expresses concerns about the condition of the tires, suggesting they might be original and advising caution for long rides. Other comments note that, although the bike is aesthetically pleasing, some restoration hints might be necessary, such as minor touch-ups on the frame and engine casing according to @2hecknback, who emphasizes not altering the paint which has developed historical character.
Negative: A few comments raise concerns regarding specific details such as the placement of the tool bag, noted by @2hecknback and others, which they argue may affect the bike’s handling. @outpostbob wonders about the feasibility of riding the bike long distances given the potential issues with the tires. Additionally, @ROJ reports an issue with the tachometer not functioning, signifying that while the bike is in generally good shape, there are maintenance aspects that need addressing before it can be fully enjoyed.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its beautiful appearance and clean condition. @Mercuryman praised the truck's aesthetics, stating it looks much better than new models currently available at Ford dealerships. @carcrazydude shared a personal experience with the same model, emphasizing its flawless operation, smooth transmission, and power from the twin turbos. They expressed confidence that the auction winner would cherish the truck, reinforcing its quality and desirability. Moreover, @performanceautogallery (The Seller) assured potential buyers of the truck's excellent state, highlighting that it was ready for use with no current known issues.
Neutral: Some comments focused on the need for additional information and transparency about the vehicle. @russl and @bigoofy requested undercarriage photos, which were eventually provided by @performanceautogallery (The Seller). Additionally, @RPMR inquired about the truck's low mileage, seeking context on its history. The seller also encouraged open communication by inviting prospective buyers to reach out with questions or requests for more photos, indicating a willingness to engage and accommodate potential concerns regarding the truck.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the integrity of the vehicle due to its maintenance history. @LKODEN questioned why parts of the undercarriage appeared repainted, which elicited a defensive response from @performanceautogallery (The Seller), who clarified that no parts were painted and that the delay in posting photos was due to logistical issues. @LKODEN later recognized the misunderstanding and thanked the seller for the clarification. However, the initial skepticism about the vehicle's condition remained a point of contention, demonstrating the potential concerns buyers may have regarding older trucks and their maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and pristine condition. @Europaisch described the car as "pristine and dreamy," suggesting excitement for the winning bidder. @G-Dub is particularly fond of the 5 spoke wheels, while @boaboyoz called the Sapphire Blue Metallic Targa 4S a "superb specimen," further calling the seller a "cool dude." Many commenters also appreciate the car's low mileage and notable features, with @CJWRacing providing videos that enhance engagement and interest. Overall, the vehicle is praised as an impressive example of Porsche engineering and aesthetics.
Neutral: Several comments focus on inquiries related to the vehicle's specifications and features. Commenters, including @Jcbl and @DrRocket, requested more information on aspects like the PPF application and warranty coverage. @CJWRacing, the seller, responded to these inquiries effectively, sharing details about the car's warranty and the absence of PPF, clarifying the condition and features. There is also discussion around the vehicle's auction history and potential bidding logistics, indicating a level of community interest and interaction regarding the overall auction process.
Negative: Some critiques surfaced regarding missing features and the lack of detailed information. @onehussler expressed concern over the absence of sport chrono, sport exhaust, or a manual transmission option, which are popular among driving enthusiasts. Additionally, @lowerfredrick pointed out that auction listings often fail to specify transmission types, suggesting that this could lead to confusion. Concerns were also raised about potential issues with the door panels on older Targa models, as noted by @porsche1986, although @CJWRacing reassured that the specific vehicle's panels are in good condition, mitigating worries to some extent.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments reflected a deep appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and history. @K5clan expressed their admiration for the beautiful truck while supporting @unclebaldy and thanking him for his service. Similarly, @cashasauras, the seller, conveyed pride in the truck’s restoration, emphasizing its fantastic shape despite needing paint work. Commenters like @Dollycat3 praised the truck’s originality, while others such as @Sicklajoie and @Beans_Bacon simply highlighted its beauty, asserting that it deserved recognition as an amazing vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @cashasauras, provided background information about the truck's history and maintenance, mentioning its purchase from the original owner's grandson and the restoration work done in 2021. They clarified that the AC issue might stem from needing an update to modern refrigerant, and they located no other significant rust areas during restoration. @MPreston454 made a technical observation about the missing belt on the AC compressor, suggesting it could potentially be a simple fix, which adds a layer of context regarding its current functionality.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming positive feedback, some concerns arose regarding the truck's AC system. @MPreston454 noted the absence of a belt on the AC compressor, which might indicate a potential problem with the compressor itself. Additionally, @JT77 highlighted the need for the seller to ensure a fair price for the truck, underscoring the importance of a balanced transaction amidst the sentimental narratives surrounding the vehicle. @67COOP also inquired about running videos, showing some uncertainty among potential buyers about the vehicle's operational state.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @theadamt expressed an exuberant opinion, declaring the vehicle to be 'insanely perfectly perfect.' This sentiment is echoed by @WAGONBOYTD, who admired the color of the vehicle, indicating a strong appreciation for its aesthetics. @CorvetteMike (The Seller) highlighted the vehicle's immaculate condition and stunning color combination, emphasizing the meticulous maintenance it received as a personal ride, which likely adds to its appeal for potential buyers.
Neutral: Commenters raised specific inquiries about the vehicle's features, such as @jk2127 questioning whether the markings under the steering wheel were stains and seeking confirmation about the Meridian sound system specifications from @charron98. The seller, @CorvetteMike, provided detailed responses, clarifying the sound system's specifications and addressing the interior condition after cleaning, ensuring transparency and engaging with the audience about the vehicle's features.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @ratsass427 regarding a potential chemical odor during a cold start of the vehicle, which @CorvetteMike (The Seller) addressed by confirming that the smell was related to a new exhaust system and posed no issues while driving or inside the vehicle. @jk2127 and others seemed to express doubt or confusion regarding the previously mentioned ownership details and the actual condition of the vehicle, reflecting skepticism about the vehicle's history.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz expressed excitement about the vehicle, referring to it as a 'tasty burger' and a sweet build, hinting at the impressive design and modifications. Furthermore, @ScrapDaddysGarage appreciated it as 'the perfect beach cruiser', suggesting that the vehicle is well-suited for leisure activities, emphasizing its recreational appeal.
Neutral: @19Willys46 inquired about viewing the vehicle, indicating genuine interest but not providing strong opinions either way. @Luda7718 raised a question regarding the VIN plate not matching the frame stamping, showing curiosity about the vehicle’s history and authenticity, but remaining neutral without expressing a definitive view.
Negative: @NJOutdoorAdventures, the seller, acknowledged the VIN discrepancy and suggested potential reasons for chassis swapping, such as rust or ease of upgrading, which may imply some concern about the vehicle's integrity. This admission hints at potential issues that might deter some buyers, reflecting negatively on the vehicle's overall perception.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @alfriedesq describes the vehicle as an "amazing machine," highlighting its appeal and desirability. @boaboyoz refers to it as a "bad a$ black California Sinister specimen," emphasizing its impressive aesthetic and strong presence. @leftycoaster, the seller, assures potential buyers that the car has been well maintained, has all features in perfect working condition, and has been garaged and covered since new, which adds credibility to the vehicle’s condition.
Neutral: @dkthomp inquires about the age of the tires, pointing out that the pictures do not clearly show the dates, and also requests confirmation on the lack of a reversing camera. @dans asks for clarification on whether the vehicle is a "30/30" model, suggesting an interest in its performance specifications. @2Southwood presents a few questions regarding the model's classification and the condition of the buttons/switches, expressing interest in purchasing after receiving more answers. @leftycoaster confirms the vehicle's maintenance history and asserts clarity on its specifications regarding the 30/30 classification.
Negative: @clean_machina warns against the potential risks of driving a high-performance car with aged tires, suggesting they may fail under stress despite appearing fine. @BobSoCal raises concerns about the leather on the dash and potential damages, noting the importance of understanding all options before making a strong bid due to the high costs of repairs. @leftycoaster acknowledges these concerns but maintains confidence in the car's pristine maintenance status, though the comments reflect a general caution among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The @mbheritage (The Seller) presents this 33k mile SL500 as a beautifully preserved vehicle with extensive documentation, including a complete service history and all original paperwork. The detailed photo essay showcases the car, highlighting its immaculate undercarriage and overall condition, which intrigues potential buyers. Commenters like @acad23 express admiration for the fully documented, low mileage, one-owner SL500 in the rare Aegean Blue color, indicating a positive perception of the vehicle's aesthetics and care it has received.
Neutral: There is an interest in the technical aspects of the car, with inquiries from various users, such as @F117 seeking clarification on whether specific recommended repairs for the spring link bushings and engine mounts were completed. Questions about the ABS repair history and the presence of any warning lights are raised by @99Springer, while @GKennedy asks about the functionality of the GPS and parking systems along with tire conditions. @Gelato inquires about the availability of a current California smog certificate, demonstrating due diligence from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's condition and compliance.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns about the repair history and functionality of certain systems. @99Springer questions whether the reported ABS repair is related to a malfunctioning Auto body control system, hinting at potential underlying issues. Furthermore, @GKennedy's multiple questions indicate uncertainty about the car's operational status, including the performance of its hydraulic systems and suspension. Additionally, @chrisdemaio's comment suggests skepticism about the bidding process, indicating that there may be concerns regarding the pricing or perceived value of the vehicle.
![]() |
Ipanema Blue Metallic 2023 Porsche 911 Carrera GTS Coupe 7-Speed
WP0AB2A90PS221149
Lot 198208
Private Party
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters are expressing strong admiration for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its unique color, Ipanema Blue Metallic. @dezeinstein celebrates the vehicle's attractive color and specifications with enthusiasm, while @ICE_in_my_veins mentions that the color is 'incredible', positioning it favorably against another popular color, Miami Blue. Comments from @GDogg and @boaboyoz emphasize the stylish and impeccable nature of the car, contributing to an overall positive perception of both the aesthetic and the specific features of the Porsche 911 Carrera GTS.
Neutral: The seller, @nirosmarba, provides various details about the car's specifications and condition in a straightforward manner, noting that the outstanding mileage is just 6,882 and that the vehicle will come with both standard and carbon fiber floor mats. @whcheney inquires about the reasons for selling, which leads @nirosmarba to share personal sentiments about downsizing prior to relocating out of state. This transparent exchange reflects a neutral understanding among potential buyers about the state of the vehicle and its selling status, without detracting from its appeal.
Negative: While the comments are largely positive, there are questions regarding specific features of the vehicle, such as @P992G911's inquiry about the carbon fiber floor mats, which initially appear absent from the photos. Additionally, @bcrichards expresses confusion over the car's designation as 'non-turbo', prompting a clarification from @AZ911. Although these comments indicate some concerns, they tend not to overshadow the overall positive view held by most commenters.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Oakhurst praised the vehicle's performance, noting that 250 hp on a 17ft runabout is impressive and that the boat looks great. @WorldofWayne echoed this sentiment, highlighting the value of the equipment and expressing excitement about the boat's speed, stating that it can reach a top speed of 77 mph. @ChrisLopez commended the seller for the quality of the build, emphasizing the investment in the boat and its uniqueness, which draws attention anywhere it goes. Most commenters seem to agree on the boat's eye-catching design and performance aspects, particularly its impressive speed and handling in various conditions.
Neutral: Comments from @Longhair-Bob and @MarsRover suggest a curiosity about the vessel's typical usage and potential performance in different environments, reflecting an interest in its capabilities without any strong positive or negative bias. @FishNuts4 queried about the construction of certain sections of the boat, expressing concern about safety but awaiting clarification, demonstrating a level of cautious interest. @Austintatiouss123, the seller, provided detailed responses explaining the boat's usage history, performance specs, and construction details, which informed the discussion while maintaining a neutral tone about the vessel's features.
Negative: Some concerns were articulated by commenters such as @CopperBullitt, who questioned the presence of brakes on the trailer, and @GreatScott, who expressed slight apprehension regarding the capacity of the transom to handle the motor's weight and power. Jokes from @PAC5337 and @Eric_B highlighted a humorous skepticism regarding the boat's name and capabilities, pointing out a disconnect between technical details and spontaneous reactions to its reputation. Generally, while some expressed lighthearted concerns, no significant negative feedback was noted regarding the vehicle's overall appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @2002WS6 expressed admiration for the Ford Ranger, citing its reliability and simplicity with a natural aspirated engine. @Reggiebottles found the vehicle to be beautiful, while @jbowders called it gorgeous and well-equipped. @MarineLayer was pleased to see that mint-condition Rangers still exist, highlighting the value of the vehicle. The seller, @4byFreak, provided additional insights and indicated that the truck, affectionately dubbed "Little Red," is remarkable despite minor flaws in the paint, reinforcing the idea that this Ranger has both functionality and charm.
Neutral: @VolInGa commented on the low mileage of their own truck compared to the one for sale, raising curiosity about the historical context of the vehicle's low miles, as posed by @VTDavid. The seller, @4byFreak, responded to inquiries, including questions about the tires' condition and possible recalls. This exchange illustrates a healthy dialogue among potential buyers and enthusiasts while maintaining a focus on the vehicle's specifications and service history.
Negative: @Finenine and @ktg214 discussed possible flaws in the paint job, questioning the visual quality of the vehicle; this indicates that some buyers are concerned about aesthetics. @Uby67vw1958 raised a potential safety issue regarding the original tires, linking it to historical recalls which could deter some buyers. Meanwhile, @gb70 sought more detailed backstory on the truck, hinting that the lack of information may concern potential buyers regarding the vehicle's history and authenticity.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the exquisite design and craftsmanship of the Mercedes-Benz 600. @SlowNRusty envisions perfect ownership, highlighting the car's luxury and the unique metallic red color adored by @shervinator. The interior details are also praised; @Dollycat3 calls it beautiful with gorgeous woodwork and excellent documentation. @UncleFred1 notes its rarity and the overall maintenance that keeps it running solidly, and @russbabe shares their enthusiastic experience of owning a similar car, which offers a smooth driving experience. The engaging comments underline the car’s status as an iconic piece of automotive engineering.
Neutral: The discussion includes a range of observations concerning the vehicle's condition and maintenance needs. While some commenters appreciate the car's exterior, others raise concerns about specific functional aspects, including air suspension issues noted by @whipcity76 and @maw06. @FantasyJunction (The Seller) provides informative insights about the car's history and suggests that prospective buyers conduct inspections to verify its condition. Furthermore, the dialogue touches on the ongoing maintenance requirements of such an iconic vehicle, with @RPChan sharing their positive experiences with part availability and service, signaling a robust community of enthusiasts.
Negative: Critiques emerge around the car's functional aspects and restoration costs. @gbdunn38 warns about the high expenses associated with restoring this vehicle, particularly regarding the hydraulic system. @whipcity76 comments on potential discrepancies in repair parts which may have been costly, while @Gregpryckman points out that the rear end appears to sag, giving a less appealing look. @BloodyHell questions the viability of converting the air suspension to conventional coils, while @cmybenz68 expresses skepticism over the lack of a reserve for such a classic car, leading to worries about its actual market value amidst restoration challenges.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @rpinson noted that everything in the car is functioning as it should, emphasizing that there are no issues with the radio or electronics based on checks done by friends. The seller is confident in the car's condition, stating it is a pristine, low mileage, well-maintained vehicle that has always been kept in a climate-controlled garage. Additionally, @rpinson thanked potential bidders and highlighted the car's desirability, indicating that it still has a new car smell and has been regularly cranked and run.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed the car's general condition and historical context, with @Deano acknowledging electrical issues in older Corvettes and @robertcope mentioning that radio button problems could often be resolved easily. @Handsofstone and @robertcope also noted possible issues with the Bose speakers and air bladders in the seats that tend to degrade over time. They expressed a hope that future owners would appreciate driving the car, implying that usage is vital for the vehicle's longevity.
Negative: Concerns were raised by several users about potential electronic gremlins common in older models. @cranked_up noted that many cars from that era, including Corvettes, often have electronic problems, which led to some skepticism about the car's reported flawless condition. @newcarpro and @robertcope pointed out factors such as brakes, seals, and electronic system reliability that might be problematic in a low mileage classic car, demonstrating a level of caution among buyers.
![]() |
Twin-Turbocharged 2021 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Coupe 3LT Z51
1G1YC2D45M5108828
Lot 198211
Dealer
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors such as @kmart714 and @MartyKC expressed strong admiration for the vehicle, referring to it as a "tremendously bad ass vehicle" with an "eye-popping" engine ambiance. The design and modifications, especially the matte wrap, received praise for their aesthetic appeal, with @brad74 noting the transformation in color as an "excellent choice." Additionally, the performance modifications, including the twin turbos, were well-received with comments highlighting their potential to boost the car's horsepower significantly, possibly reaching ranges of 900 to 1200hp according to @Joelcar.
Neutral: There were inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and modifications, with @jlew64 asking about the horsepower rating associated with the turbochargers. Comments by @Vettesrock and others noted the interesting nature of the car's upgrades and encouraged discussions about their functionality. The seller, identified as @motorcarmarketusa, provided details about the air suspension system, clarifying its adjustable features and performance capabilities, thus addressing various questions about the car's setup and historical maintenance.
Negative: However, not all feedback was positive; users like @flyguy0812 criticized the air suspension, arguing that it could compromise handling and was unsuitable for track use, questioning the need for turbochargers in that context. Others, such as @Z06Jeff, raised concerns about potential corrosion observed on certain parts of the car, hinting at previous storage conditions as a possible factor. @Rguy's comment about the Lambo doors also reflected a negative sentiment regarding certain modifications, suggesting not all alterations were appreciated by the community.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's unique Midnight Pearl color, with @usd97 proclaiming it will make a record and @jdemeter noting its beauty, particularly the rarity of the color. @vivanshah and @mhawkeONT highlight the rare combination of the midnight pearl hue and under-tan interior, considering it a fantastic aesthetic pairing. The seller @GenauAutoWerks also shares personal anecdotes about the enjoyment of driving the car and interactions with enthusiasts, generating excitement among potential bidders. Various users appreciate the car's mileage, emphasizing that it has been enjoyed without being overly pampered, suggesting it is in great shape and ready for further adventure.
Neutral: Some users discuss the specifics of the car's maintenance and history, indicating they are impressed it has been driven extensively yet remains in excellent condition. @clemens87 and @mhawkeONT highlight the rarity of the model and color, while @toptime79 mentions the combination of miles and modifications, speculating on how this may affect the auction outcome. Additionally, @dsinger808 and others raise questions about past service issues, advising potential buyers to weigh the history against the selling price, indicative of a balanced perspective among prospective buyers.
Negative: Concerns have been voiced about the car's previous accident report and the impact of maintenance costs, with @lottacars questioning why minor paint issues weren't addressed sooner. @dsinger808 inquired about a noted intermittent misfire and its resolution, expressing cautious optimism given the car's documented history but still highlighting potential future repairs. Furthermore, @vobert points out a possible leak in the driveshaft, suggesting that while the car is desirable, some mechanical apprehensions remain among the commenters.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The 1957 Cadillac Eldorado Brougham has received widespread admiration for its stunning design and rich historical significance. @Dollycat3 marvels at its stunning aesthetics, calling it the finest example seen in a long time, while @BigGar and @Thucydides characterize it as a beautiful piece of automotive history that exemplifies luxury and elegance. Many commenters, including @e9er and @59caddycoupe, appreciate its engineering significance, praising the unique features like the stainless-steel roof and the dual four-barrel carburetors that highlight Cadillac's commitment to innovation during the glamorous 1950s.
Neutral: The comments regarding the Cadillac's condition reflect a balanced perspective on its restorability and historical context. @cruzahome notes the mixed reputation vintage Cadillacs have as restoration nightmares, recognizing the allure they hold for enthusiasts. @Symbolic_International (The Seller) shares the car's extensive provenance and service history, while also confirming that many original components, like the air suspension system, are still available for the new owner. @ethans and others inquire about the practicality of restoring certain features, reflecting a keen interest in the car's functional aspects alongside its beauty.
Negative: Despite the accolades, some commenters have expressed concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and maintainability. @kz78hy pointed out the suspension issues and emphasized that restoring it to factory specifications may be necessary for optimal performance. @cruzahome raised questions about why certain flaws, like the warped dashboard, were not addressed, suggesting a need for more restoration effort. Additionally, @MDBROOKS noted a lack of attention to details, indicating that the vehicle may require significant care and assistance from knowledgeable enthusiasts to maintain its charm and functionality.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @moltenfuzzy expressed admiration for the car, stating it is one of their dream cars and praised the 997 manuals for being the best. @titans99 referred to the car as a nominee for best driving videos, indicating it performs well on the road. @Stlcm and @exm3racer expressed gratitude towards @jlaughlinbat (The Seller) for providing additional videos and details about the car, highlighting the seller's engagement and commitment to transparency during the sale process.
Neutral: @jlaughlinbat (The Seller) provided detailed responses to inquiries, including clarifying the car's features such as the non-heated sport seats and its track usage history. The seller mentioned an over rev that occurred early in the car's life and assured that the car sounds great, although the videos might not capture the sound quality accurately. They also addressed questions about repairs and modifications, including the installation of an Auto blip system and the status of the tires.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns about the car's history, referencing its track use and potential wear, with @R1c2rdo likening it to dating someone with a complicated past. @aelarson inquired about the potential IMS issue, while @TheRaven69 and others asked about rust and the condition of different parts, which might raise concerns for buyers. @kmarques and @No-subt2 demanded additional specifics on the car’s reserve price and tire conditions, indicating some skepticism about the vehicle's overall value.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed high praise for the vehicle, with @boaboyoz calling it a "cool K10" and @99oneTcab noting its sexiness and that it's a great looking truck. @pigman highlighted the truck's cleanliness and solid construction, likening its performance to that of a Swiss watch. Additionally, @C10HQ acknowledged the rarity of the K10 model, specifically mentioning the limited production numbers, further adding to its desirability. Overall, there is a strong appreciation for the craftsmanship and condition of the truck, along with excitement from potential buyers.
Neutral: The seller, @Coupex, provided detailed insights about the truck's specifications and condition, including the modifications made for improved performance, such as new power steering and braking systems. There were inquiries from users like @jdjonesdr and @MoonRunner regarding the engine type and cruising speed capabilities, with @MoonRunner elucidating on the different types of 235 engines over the years. Coupex also clarified the truck's history and the efforts made to ensure it runs smoothly, as well as addressing minor imperfections stemming from its storage history. These details helped establish a factual basis for potential buyers to evaluate the vehicle considerations.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns or pointed out specific issues about the truck. @cjs66Mustang questioned the presence of a fuel tank within the cab, while @MoonRunner asked about the engine's capabilities and potential for overheating during prolonged driving. @Coupex acknowledged the minor leakage from the transfer case, although he reassured potential buyers that it is a common issue with older trucks. Additionally, he pointed out some cosmetic imperfections from years of storage, emphasizing that while it is not a concourse-level restoration, it remains visually appealing overall.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @bwsinclair describes the motorcycle as beautiful and expresses a desire to have features added that enhance modern usability, like an electric start. @1Hotshot agrees, calling it a great-looking Hog. @D90LE_001of300 appreciates the classic vintage feel of the bike with a thumbs-up emoji. @Speir remarks positively on its aesthetics, calling it a beautiful Pan and shows interest in its features. Overall, many commenters share admiration for the bike's classic design and appeal, emphasizing its representation of the vintage Harley-Davidson style.
Neutral: Comments reflect curiosity about specific vehicle features and specifications. @broodie questions the title and the originality of parts, demonstrating due diligence regarding its authenticity. @Moro72 (The Seller) responds confirming the title details and registration status without any issues. @srd6 seeks clarification on the motorcycle's components compared to original specifications, indicating a desire for specific knowledge about the model. @Atomic11 shows interest in the paint color, receiving clarification from @Moro72 (The Seller) about its Bahama blue hue.
Negative: @1000nutsnbolts expresses concern about the rear brake pedal's size and positioning, suggesting a potential safety issue. @Baxters_Dad recalls his cousin's experience riding a similar motorcycle but highlights some drawbacks such as the outdated brake system, which may not offer modern stopping power. The overall sentiment indicates some apprehension about the bike's practicality and safety in comparison to modern standards, while still nostalgic about its classic charm.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz described the Chrysler 300 as an excellent example, calling it a 'killer Chrysler 300 (!) Limousine,' which reflects a positive sentiment about its design and functionality. @martinmotorco, the seller, is proactive in engaging potential buyers by inviting questions as the listing deadline approaches. @Richard17 expressed a willingness to consider purchasing the vehicle, even noting that it would be a financial stretch, indicating that there is interest in the vehicle's value and appeal.
Neutral: @idling made a humorous remark about the vehicle's price, indicating it seems more like a $30,000 car, reflecting a general surprise at its valuation but not necessarily swaying buyer opinions. @Samson27 questioned the vehicle's weight and expressed amazement at the performance of the 3.6 V6 engine, suggesting curiosity about the vehicle's specifications. @newcarpro provided the VIN and a detailed description of the vehicle's specifications and features, which serves as informative content for potential buyers.
Negative: @sfsv criticized the vehicle's engineering, stating that Chrysler never produced a 300 chassis engineered for extensive modifications typically used in limousines, suggesting it may have limitations. Additionally, @neilpierson25 expressed concern about the vehicle's size, indicating he would step back if it were to signal a turn, hinting at an intimidating presence. @2caddiesandaMach1 made a dismissive comparison to a Maybach S600, suggesting a lack of seriousness regarding the vehicle's appeal or status in the luxury car market.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @bosshoss3406pack expresses a deep appreciation for his Harley, recalling fond memories of riding through Texas and Colorado on a rugged bike that provided an exhilarating experience with its torque and connection to the road. He notes the beauty of the bike and shares anecdotes about its unique features, such as the small gas tank and the challenges associated with it, highlighting the nostalgia of owning such a machine. Fellow commentors like @PDXBryan express interest in nostalgic motorcycle shows hinting at the allure of bikes from that era.
Neutral: @Jerbo acknowledges the seller's contribution while raising a question about the bike's brake system. He points out that despite service work recorded on the invoice, the listing suggests that the brakes still require attention. @JaybirdMotors, the seller, clarifies that while the focus was on making the bike operational, further attention on the brakes might be recommended for longer rides, indicating a level of transparency in the selling process.
Negative: Some underlying concerns arise as @Jerbo points out potential discrepancies in the maintenance history of the bike, suggesting that it may not be in as good a condition as indicated. This hints at a lack of thoroughness in the servicing of crucial components like the brakes, which could be a dealbreaker for some buyers. Additionally, the reliance on a small gas reserve can add to the frustration for riders unaccustomed to managing fuel efficiently, as alluded to by @bosshoss3406pack's humorous yet cautionary tales from his own experiences.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Hackberry mentioned that the vehicle comes with chains and tensioners, indicating it is well-equipped and ready for use. They noted that the faded paint looks great, suggesting an appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic, and encouraged others to focus on improving the interior. @Marcon1 expressed excitement about the truck, likening it to a unique find from a popular garage show, which reflects a positive community response towards the vehicle's charm and potential.
Neutral: @68blue clarified that the vehicle has an automatic transmission, supported by visual evidence and listing details, putting an end to uncertainty about its transmission. @rgfulks pointed out a common misconception about the headlights, while @Bowties_garage confirmed that square headlights were indeed an option in 1980, illustrating a constructive discussion about the vehicle's features. @KJclassics requested better photographs of the rust areas, indicating that while there is some interest, there are also concerns about the vehicle's condition that need addressing.
Negative: @Aegis43 brought attention to a potential error in the description of the vehicle's transmission, suggesting a lack of thoroughness in the listing. @Ol_Scrapey noted that the wheels on the vehicle do not appear to be as described, which raises concerns about the vehicle's authenticity or modifications. @YennaM inquired about the original mileage, indicating a skepticism about the vehicle's history and suggesting that transparency regarding such details could improve buyer trust.
![]() |
1999 Ford F-350 Super Duty XLT Crew Cab Power Stroke 4×4 Dually
1FTWW33F5XEC54049
Lot 198190
Private Party
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenter @bigbuckaroo47 expresses a favorable view of the 1999 Ford F-350, describing it as still looking outstanding with original paint and interior. He highlights the truck's performance when towing cars, the addition of a performance module that improved mileage, and routine maintenance which has ensured its reliability over the years. Furthermore, he notes that the vehicle has spent its life in favorable conditions in the California Central Coast area, implying it has been well taken care of. Additionally, he mentions that the truck comes with high-quality semi-truck tires that were installed five years ago.
Neutral: @bigbuckaroo47 also points out that the truck has its original transmission, which has been serviced regularly without any major issues. He comments that it runs flawlessly and discusses an overdrive unit that aids fuel mileage, providing a balanced perspective by acknowledging the vehicle's primary purpose as not being fuel efficiency. He provides information on the truck's specifications, such as its 4WD capabilities and heavy-duty features, while noting that it is comparable to a semi-truck in size and power.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, @bigbuckaroo47 mentions a previous issue with a faulty starter, suggesting that while there have been minor problems, they have been relatively few and manageable. There is an acknowledgment of changing regulations as the performance module had to be removed due to California EPA smog requirements, which could imply some limitations regarding emissions compliance. Overall, there are few negative comments about the vehicle, but the concerns raised are pertinent for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments emphasize the high quality of the vehicle, especially highlighting its impressive build by U.P. Garage. @peanutbutterfordogs notes that it looks like a quality build, while @ForeverCar praises its great parts and condition, expressing envy for the future owner. @MMTHBNZ and @gabednconfused commend it as a properly built and clean example of the R32 GTR, with attention to detail on the components installed. Multiple users, including @Skylinedrvr and @LoudNotFast, recognize the car's powerful performance, especially with @911r (The Seller) mentioning it managed 450HP to the wheels on E85, creating excitement among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commentators express curiosity about the car's performance metrics and specifications, indicating that they appreciate the information. @JFStAmour asks about the torque characteristics of the V-Cam engine, while @ForeverCar mulls over the dyno figures, suggesting they may have inaccuracies. @wimankid inquires about the fit for taller individuals, and the collective effort from different users to provide insights indicates a community engaged in discussing technical details. @911r (The Seller) responds to several of these queries, demonstrating that the seller is actively participating in the conversation and providing additional information.
Negative: On the negative side, some commenters express technical skepticism regarding the dyno readings and the car's power delivery characteristics. @JFStAmour highlights a potential miscommunication about the RPM readings in the dyno graph, indicating a lack of trust in the reported figures. @ForeverCar and @JFinStAmour also share concerns about the accuracy of the torque measurements, suggesting that buyers should be cautious. Overall, while the car's appeal is well-acknowledged, there are hints of doubt concerning the provided data that could deter some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed a strong appreciation for the Mercedes 280GE, highlighting its vibrant green color and overall excellent condition. @Nibo stated, "Lovin the green, good luck!" while @TH110 remarked, "Looks gloriously brand new!" The vehicle's preservation was also commended, with @JGraham noting it as a "super cool, and super well preserved G wagon." Furthermore, @Blizzard340 reminisced fondly about their own past experience with a similar model, sharing their love for the seats.
Neutral: The discussions included various queries and additional insights shared by both potential buyers and the seller, @hayrancher. @MM4 requested a cold start and drive video, illustrating interest in the vehicle's operational quality. @stuharris praised the truck and asked for details about where to purchase mats similar to those seen in the listing. Throughout the conversation, @hayrancher provided updates, confirming that driving and cold start videos were forthcoming and that additional photos of the frame, suspension, and driveline were available.
Negative: Some concerns about the vehicle's condition were raised, specifically regarding the passenger side window mechanism, which @hayrancher identified as needing a new window regulator. Furthermore, @JGraham pointed out that the front end alignment might be slightly off, to which @hayrancher assured that the vehicle drives straight and without play. @Runman inquired about the factory color code, indicating an interest in the authenticity of the vehicle's specifications, while @bringatrailer confirmed that the listing had been updated to reflect the necessary clarification on the faulty window regulator.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @securebid992 highlights the BMW Z4 M Roadster's appealing aesthetics, especially in blue and bronze/tan, praising it as the best spec version. @Darbster describes it as an "absolute beauty," further underscoring the car's visual charm. @chuckgoolsbee also appreciates the vehicle's design, specifically the blue with wood trim interior, calling it "perfection for the E85M" and emphasizes its exhilarating driving experience, labeling it as an under-appreciated classic that offers joy on the road.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics provides extensive information about the vehicle, including its recent auction, mileage, and positive reviews from customers, detailing their commitment to smooth transactions and quality service. They invite potential buyers to inspect the car at their location in Douglassville, PA, and offer nationwide/international shipping and logistics support. Additionally, they address inquiries about the car's damage history and confirm that the front bumper sustained paint damage during parking, which has been repaired with a color match.
Negative: @60triumph and @Paulrussell1957 express concern regarding the car's history, asking about the damages reported on Carfax and requesting detailed information about the front end damages. @chuckgoolsbee critiques the outdated navigation unit in this model year, suggesting it detracts from the overall appeal, although they still hold the car in high regard overall.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed high praise for the Maico motorcycle, highlighting its beauty and impressive features. @39mercman noted its aesthetics, calling it a beautiful machine, while @dave02a simply stated "Perfection!" @Catana246 appreciated the larger foot pegs, reflecting on their own past experiences with previous Maico models. @bmasho mentioned the motorcycle's potential for post-vintage racing, commending its modifications such as the larger gas tank and non-stock up-pipe, suggesting that this bike could perform exceptionally well. @a990dna contributed positively by sharing their personal experience with a Maico that started after years of storage, reflecting on the bike's reliability and performance.
Neutral: @Tigerman1953, the seller, engaged actively with commenters, providing information and answering questions about the motorcycle. They explained that the bike was built for motocross, clarifying queries from @thedude2 about its version type, and welcoming remarks related to the history and significance of the Maico models from the 70s. Commenters like @Sprinkman shared nostalgic memories of riding, connecting the current auction with personal revelations about the bike's past glory in motocross culture. Overall, there was a shared appreciation among enthusiasts about the bike’s place in history and its performance attributes.
Negative: Some commenters brought attention to the modifications that might deter certain buyers. @bmasho cautioned that while the bike had been altered for better performance, Maico enthusiasts seeking an unmodified collectible should consider looking elsewhere. @a990dna and @Sprinkman touched on their own memories around handling and performance issues, with @a990dna recounting a friend’s unfortunate incident while riding, potentially hinting at the risks associated with powerful bikes like the Maico. Overall, the conversation included mixed feelings about the bike's modifications and its suitability as a collector's item.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @crzygoat (The Seller): Here are additional pictures of the seats for ones that asked, providing reassurance to potential buyers about the condition of the vehicle.
Neutral: @GREEKMBA: Why? asks a question suggesting curiosity about the vehicle's details without any negative implications. @bmwfuture raises a neutral point regarding the lack of maintenance records on Carfax, prompting inquiry into the car's history. @Lengrep mentions the need for closer photos of the trunk and undercarriage to assist bidders, indicating a desire for transparency.
Negative: @AVMaster619 discusses a total failure and a specific weld issue, indicating significant structural concerns with the vehicle. @Lengrep makes a costly suggestion regarding the Randy Forbes kit, hinting at major repair needs. @CMOT inquires about the driveability for a long distance, which may suggest doubts about the car's current condition.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @spyboy praised the bike, stating it was 'very nicely done' and wished the seller good luck with the auction. @Multistrada1 appreciated the build quality and reliability of K100 engines, emphasizing their ability to perform well even with high mileage. @OFaceDrew called the bike beautiful and well-executed, while @Damaho912 described the craftsmanship as impeccable. Others, like @SteveN.L., who has owned a K bike for over 25 years, noted the bike’s dependability and ease of maintenance, emphasizing that they are great motorcycles.
Neutral: @kurzawaj inquired about pictures of the bike in sunlight instead of a dark studio, indicating interest in seeing more details. @thousander asked what modifications were made to the powerplant aside from resealing, showing curiosity about the bike’s history. @Jwaldo confirmed that the VIN matches the title, which indicates the bike is a 1985 BMW. @argo19c raised concerns about torque steer in previous models while asking if the new build alleviates this issue and confirmed the title is clear, showing a cautious yet interested approach.
Negative: Comments expressing concern about the bike included @urahozer asking about its registration in Arizona, as well as @argo19c sharing a negative personal experience with torque steer from the K100. These inquiries reflect a hesitation among potential buyers regarding past issues related to the model, despite the overall positive portrayal from many others.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have praised the 1972 Buick Riviera for its striking design and excellent condition. @HotDoug remarked that the car is very classy and should set a new value standard for Rivieras, while @Dollycat3 called it a superb Cascade Blue beauty. @baronvonbrutus described it as a gem and expressed hopes for a successful sale, indicating the car's appeal is universally recognized. The seller, @Tripledigit, shared fond memories associated with the vehicle, emphasizing its nostalgic value and providing detailed upgrades they've made over the years, which contributed to the overall positive sentiment around the vehicle's presentation.
Neutral: Several comments offered neutral observations regarding specific features and details of the car. @buickboy63 noted that the automatic air conditioning option is rare, while also pointing out a minor issue with screws missing from the driver door that could affect the functionality. @KeninSJ suggested that the rattle mentioned might stem from those missing screws. @SI7 and @stratoclipper appreciated the detailed photos shared by the seller, showing both the car's condition and age-related items, although @TJClassic expressed a desire for a different platform for the Riviera to enhance handling and performance.
Negative: On the negative side, some users, such as @TJClassic, criticized the Riviera's size, suggesting that it would have performed better on a smaller platform. @Rivnut also commented on how the original design intention was lost when adapting it to a full-size platform, which may have impacted sales. @BigRedRivi raised concerns about minor leaks noted in the vehicle's photos, prompting further discussion on the maintenance history of the car. Despite these concerns, the overall discussion maintains that the car is appealing, even if some aspects could be improved.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments about the 1979 Volkswagen Super Beetle Convertible highlight its appealing features and the professionalism of the seller, @1600veloce. @KRITIK specifically praises it as a 'beautiful example' of the last true VW breed and commends the comprehensive presentation with high-quality photos and videos. Many other commenters, like @Wagen59 and @Rev., also express admiration for the vehicle's visual appeal, contributing to an overall impression that the car is a desirable collectible.
Neutral: Some comments touch on logistical aspects and clarify details about the car's history. @Kayemtee and @Jeff1932 raise questions about the car's previous ownership and mileage, acknowledging its age and the potential for unaccounted years. @bcollopy and @fpw777 inquire about additional photos and inspection opportunities, indicating an interest in the vehicle while seeking further information about its condition and accessibility.
Negative: There are some concerns noted regarding the car's specifics. For instance, @Rev. expresses uncertainty over the vehicle's stance, questioning whether the front end is high or the back end is low, suggesting a need for clarity on its condition. There's a hint of skepticism about the mileage as @Kayemtee notes that no representation can be made regarding it, casting doubt on the documentation provided. Overall, while the vehicle is generally well-regarded, these uncertainties indicate a cautious approach from some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Mcfly1985 expressed admiration for the vehicle, describing it as "Stunning!!!". @Nostalgia echoed this sentiment, referring to it as a "dream car" and expressing an aspiration to own it someday. @berfinroy contributed a positive remark about the car's exhaust note, highlighting its appeal for those who appreciate speed without drawing attention. @Scott_S also provided a nostalgic perspective, recalling his positive experience with a similar car from the past.
Neutral: @1600veloce (The Seller) provided detailed information about the car, explaining that it came from a fellow BaT member who had purchased it for his wife, but she couldn't get comfortable driving it. The seller emphasized his commitment to quality by describing his active role in providing thorough listings and facilitating vehicle sales, including offering a live video walkthrough. The seller also addressed questions about recent work done on the vehicle, including the installation of a new radio and explaining ongoing issues with the air conditioning and heating.
Negative: @amandatoryy questioned the reason for selling the car so soon after purchase, while @Hnssail and @Sinfull expressed skepticism about the quick turnover, suggesting there may be a hidden issue. @raylam88 pointed out potential concerns with the vehicle's shifter leather in the driving video, and @Brian289 raised issues about the air conditioning and heating, seeking clarification on intermittent functionality. @Bingo123 highlighted several unresolved issues from previous auctions, expressing frustration with the vehicle's reliability and maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @e39M5isLife expressed that the vehicle sparks joy, indicating a strong emotional connection to it. @Subverbo agreed with enthusiasm, suggesting a shared appreciation for the car. Additionally, @allroadbuffoon highlighted the reliability and fun nature of the vehicle, appreciating its comfort and highway performance. @R2-2U noted having owned two of these models and praised their overall quality, mentioning that the upgrades on the listed vehicle address common concerns, thus reducing bidding risks.
Neutral: @1600VeloceAssist (The Seller) provided information about the auction process for the 2005 Audi Allroad 2.7T, explaining the seller and buyer experience cultivated by the Assist Program and the support provided throughout the transaction. @wagonsrcool inquired about the absence of a driving video, expressing interest while appreciating the thoroughness of the car's description and images. @againstbetterjudgment reminisced about their experience with the Allroad, noting how their past vehicle performed excellently in adverse weather conditions, but did not provide specific feedback on the current auction details.
Negative: General concerns were raised about the vehicle's past issues with the air suspension system, though @R2-2U mentioned that the modifications made on this car help alleviate that risk. @againstbetterjudgment's comment about 'crickets' hints at potential frustrations with the auction's engagement and communication, indicating a desire for more interaction and urgency in responses.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dollycat3 praises the Lexus GS300, calling it a "Sweet GS300👌." @Shomoil, the seller, promotes the vehicle by highlighting its well-maintained condition and the brand new tires, indicating readiness for driving. @magicalmike reflects positively on the car's legacy, reminiscing about his mother's version of the same model that lasted 200k miles without issues. He describes this particular GS300 as a clean example and wishes the seller good luck with the sale. @mr_smee agrees with @magicalmike and appreciates the peak era of Lexus, suggesting that this car is a worthwhile buy due to the decline in Lexus quality in recent years.
Neutral: @Shomoil (The Seller) notes that he has been driving many cars but finds something particularly enjoyable about driving this GS, referring to it as "pure perfection." @dobbaker inquires about the timing belt change, and @Shomoil responds that it has not yet been changed but he is looking for more information on it. Additionally, @Shomoil offers to change the timing belt and water pump for the next buyer for an extra $750, emphasizing their willingness to assist the buyer with maintenance.
Negative: @mr_smee expresses dissatisfaction with modern Lexus models, stating that the brand's quality has noticeably declined over the years, with electronics issues and poor interior trim. He laments that Lexus no longer remembers its high standards from the past. While acknowledging the favorable comments for the GS300, @oldfordlover shares his own positive experience with a different Lexus model, the ES350h, and implies that it was a more reliable vehicle for him compared to the GS series, suggesting that not everyone shares the same opinions about GS300 favorability.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ScoobyDone praised the car, describing it as very well done and beautiful. They expressed admiration for the 911 models from this era, highlighting their combination of excellent looks, a robust 2.7 litre CIS injection engine, and great handling capabilities. This comment reflects confidence in the vehicle's condition, emphasizing that much of the car has been preserved or restored, and predicts strong bidding activity for the auction.
Neutral: @StevenAJ responded to a question from @dinodiaz8 about the car's registration history in Georgia, indicating that the seller is not aware of any such registration. @David_P noted that the car was likely previously painted in Chocolate Brown, a color that they believe looks good in red now, suggesting that while it had a controversial past, its current appearance is pleasing. @pjs911 expressed their enthusiasm for the car's representation on the auction site, indicating their hope that it will attract a strong bid.
Negative: @Herford made a critical remark comparing the car's size to that of their TR6, insinuating that the vehicle may not be as impressive as some might believe. This comment could imply a sense of disappointment or lack of enthusiasm about the vehicle's stature or capabilities in comparison to others in its class.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as an exceptional and gorgeous Continental, highlighting its highly desirable color combination and original aspects. @maw06 appreciates its classy black over red styling, emphasizing the unique experience of opening both doors on one side. @MMunger shares personal enthusiasm, stating that driving the car with the top down on a sunny day is pure joy and affirms the car sounds great from the back. @axelrider admires the timeless design, recalling their own experience with a similar model and the smoothness of its acceleration, encouraging future owners to enjoy it. @danielchar (The Seller) reassures potential buyers about the car's dependability, mentioning it is regularly driven and well-maintained.
Neutral: Commenters discuss various features and aspects of the vehicle without strong positive or negative sentiments. @stathios notes the car's automatic high beams and emphasizes the value of experiencing the car in its original condition without modifications. @Neilpierson25 mentions general maintenance issues like gasket replacement as a common occurrence but frames it as manageable. The car's aesthetics are addressed by several, including @Contimax who admires its beauty but reminds that there are mechanical aspects, such as the exhaust, that require attention. @Thomasjc23 questions the functionality of the rear windows, reflecting typical buyer inquiries. @mntoys asks specific questions about bodywork and undercarriage maintenance, indicating investigative interest from potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding potential mechanical issues and maintenance challenges. @jdjonesdr asks if the exhaust is loud due to a muffler issue, and @Magnus123 agrees that exhaust manifold replacement can be a significant annoyance, although it doesn't require pulling the engine. @neilpierson25 corroborates this sentiment, suggesting that a leaking exhaust gasket should be fixed to prevent further issues. @safarilang questions the vehicle's air conditioning and hydraulic systems, exposing worries about its servicing history. @Contimax cautions about idling the car unattended due to exhaust issues, showing that while the car is beautiful, it may present specific maintenance concerns.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @mrbdh expressed appreciation for the electric blue color of the R53, recalling fond memories of their previous 2006 model. @maw06, who owns a similar vehicle, highlighted numerous positive aspects, including its excellent steering feedback, good gas mileage when driven conservatively, and the supercharger's performance. Others, such as @Helmuth.Fishmonger and @LuvBritCars, shared their enjoyment and long-term ownership experiences with the R53, noting its fun driving dynamics and reliability over the years, while @maw06 mentioned it's a great highway cruiser despite differing opinions on its fuel efficiency.
Neutral: Several commenters asked the seller, @iakllc, various questions regarding the car's service history, including whether the supercharger has been serviced and if any recalls have been addressed. @julios1234 inquired about maintenance records, and @stationmedic requested videos to better assess the car's condition. @bobbygi specifically sought additional photos of the undercarriage, while others focused on the air conditioning system and the status of strut mounts, indicating their interest in the vehicle's overall condition without making strong judgments.
Negative: @Rumbling expressed concern regarding the lack of attention given to a safety recall by the original owner, emphasizing the importance of addressing such issues for peace of mind. @shelbyglhs shared a negative experience regarding the R53's highway performance and claimed it has poorer fuel efficiency compared to other vehicles, contrasting it with their previous models. @BBD-700 noted potential rust on vertical kick panels and suggested that bidders should investigate further, reflecting typical apprehensions about the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beautiful color combination and attractive design features. @Steelyman noted the stunning color combo, while @GoBoGo echoed the sentiment with their affection for the color scheme. @Rekorb9 praised the car's excellent upkeep, pointing out its status as one-owner with service records, and described it as a rewarding analog two-seater that offers fun and power. Furthermore, @SKoobaBC (The Seller) shared their excitement about listing the car, mentioning that it has been well-maintained, driven responsibly, and is in excellent condition without any racing or smoking history.
Neutral: There were several inquiries about the car's IMS bearing, reflecting a mix of curiosity and concern regarding potential issues. @maharba01 raised the question about bore scoring and IMS bearings, which led to discussions among other commenters, including @surebeted, who questioned the necessity of IMS replacement in their own vehicle. @SKoobaBC (The Seller) addressed these concerns by clarifying that this specific model comes with a lower failure rate IMS bearing, and he shared information about its maintenance history to assure potential buyers about the car's reliability.
Negative: Some comments pointed out potential apprehensions surrounding the vehicle's IMS bearings and general upkeep costs. @surebeted expressed skepticism about the necessity of replacing the IMS bearing, showing concern over costs and maintenance recommendations. Additionally, @kfee questioned if the model had an adjustable exhaust valve, indicating some uncertainty about the specifications, which could be perceived negatively in the context of a seller listing a high-end vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle, highlighting its distinctive style and impressive build quality. @Lcv described the truck as 'very cool' and 'nicely done,' while @Tituswolf351 called it a 'sick build.' @coreyw66 expressed their admiration by stating they 'dig this truck,' and @WILWAXU was impressed after seeing it in person and noted it as a 'great build.' Moreover, @boaboyoz referred to it as a 'wonderful Woodlands F-100' and 'phenomenal build.' Other users like @viking00 similarly labeled it a 'nice clean daily driver build' and @GREEKMBA mentioned it as a 'great build,' indicating a strong appreciation for the craftsmanship involved in the restomod.
Neutral: The seller, @cullenZ, provided comprehensive information and engaged with the community by answering queries regarding the truck. He explained the truck's features, performance metrics, and details about the restoration process, including its 1966 Texas title and the use of a Dakota Digital gauge system. Several users inquired about specific aspects such as the speedometer accuracy, rear axle ratio, and comfort of the seating position. For instance, @HemiEddie426 raised concerns about the speedometer during a driving video, while @AndyJo confirmed he was interested in the registration details. @Rydogg86 expressed curiosity about the legroom, demonstrating that potential buyers are actively evaluating its practicality for daily driving.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming positivity, a few users raised concerns about certain aspects of the truck. @mike_rockwell remarked that while it seemed like a solid build, it would have been beneficial to see the gauges in the driving video. @msib expressed apprehension regarding the wooden bed floor, questioning its durability as a daily driver, fearing it might rot. Additionally, @Rseay noted inconsistencies regarding the brush guard's appearance in the photos, seeking clarification on its inclusion. Though these comments were constructive, they indicate that potential buyers are considering the practicality and longevity of specific components of the truck.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Overall, many commenters express a deep affection for the Alfa Duetto, highlighting it as a beautiful and enjoyable car to drive. @Hoppy18 shares that despite it not achieving the highest sale price, the vehicle remains their favorite, while @MDN appreciates the unique open-top driving experience it offers. Several commenters acknowledge the car's charm, with @LowerCape and @job1 emphasizing the positive aspects and stressing that it can provide enjoyment regardless of its current condition.
Neutral: A number of discussions revolve around the vehicle's restoration needs and maintenance, portraying a mix of perspectives. @SirMichael57 probes into the costs of various restoration aspects, while @OssoBene and @ossodiseppia provide insights into the challenges faced during restorations. Some members, like @Watry, assert that restoration can be manageable, but emphasize the unknowns involved when restoring vintage cars, particularly their hidden rust issues.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly around needed repairs and potentially costly bodywork. @zloz69 points out concerning gauge readings in the driving video, while @ossodiseppia warns about the extensive metal work required, suggesting that many areas may not have been repaired properly. The tone among some commenters, including @ossodiseppia and @SirMichael57, is cautious, urging potential buyers to thoroughly inspect the vehicle rather than relying solely on the provided images, indicating a feeling of apprehension over making a purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as a beautiful E320 in a striking Royal Indigo Metallic with a magnificent Mushroom leather interior. @AndriiKlymuk (The Seller) emphasizes that this car is in impeccable condition, having been in one family for its entire life and showing no signs of rust, which is rare for W210 models. The exterior color is highlighted as unique and stunning, especially when it shines in the sun, and the interior is noted for its pristine condition, seemingly untouched since showroom delivery. There are compliments about the car's reliability, with @Peter0 stating it has the lowest cost of ownership compared to competitors like Honda and Toyota, citing his own experience with high-mileage W210s that have required minimal maintenance.
Neutral: Various commenters discuss the vehicle's aesthetic aspects and functionality without strong emotional slants. @sjgnyc expresses a preference for different interior colors but acknowledges that the mushroom and violet hues go well together, indicating a well-rounded appreciation for the vehicle's unique combination. @JLP80 inquires about the car's condition regarding hidden dings or scratches, showing interest in maintaining transparency regarding the car's appearance. Similarly, @DriveMsport asks about future listings of V8s, indicating a desire to stay informed about similar high-performance options available.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, there are concerns from commenters regarding certain issues with the vehicle. @Buhzilly points out an illuminated SRS warning light, prompting inquiries about potential mechanical problems. @AndriiKlymuk (The Seller) explains that while this warning is fairly common and does not indicate damage, this concern could affect buyer perception. Although the seller reassures that the vehicle is in perfect condition and promises to address the warning light, the mention of such issues might create some hesitation among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Tom_S. called the bike a gorgeous machine, while @GLWA,billpayne praised it for being pretty much flawless and a blast to ride, referring to it as a real head-turner. @Slam105 appreciated the retro styling and less-is-more design, recalling the classic aesthetics of 60s Triumphs. @Crowsfoot highlighted the bike's combination of beauty and performance, suggesting that the new owner would appreciate its guts as much as its looks. Overall, the comments reflect a strong admiration for the bike's appearance and performance, with several users expressing joy in riding it.
Neutral: @DjangoHP expressed interest in hearing how the bike sounds, indicating a general curiosity about its performance aspects. @novabig64 and @Odessa both sought clarification on the bike's service history, asking if it had been properly maintained and started regularly. @Premierautofl (The Seller) provided information about the bike's one-owner history, storage conditions, and impending maintenance including an oil change and confirmation of original tires. This neutral feedback primarily revolves around the bike's condition and maintenance record, which potential buyers consider important before bidding.
Negative: @BloodyHell compared the bike's ride to another vehicle, suggesting he prefers it for a lower price. @Crowsfoot offered a note of caution regarding potential maintenance issues, such as the recall on the side stand spring and the necessity to change out the original fork oil, indicating potential concerns for new owners. These comments highlight some skepticism or caution regarding the bike's maintenance needs and the challenges of ensuring its optimal performance.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters express admiration for the truck, highlighting its beautiful appearance and impressive condition. @MIKEAC described it as a "beautiful looking truck," while @Piros1 noted its very nice quality and great sound. Additionally, @Vic (The Seller) emphasized its excellent functionality by stating that it runs and drives really nice, and there are supportive videos available for potential buyers to view.
Neutral: @Vic (The Seller) provided detailed responses to various inquiries about the vehicle, addressing questions from potential buyers regarding its features. @TurboTomj asked about air conditioning, to which @Vic confirmed its absence. Likewise, @AlexanderE inquired about the type of automatic transmission, and @Vic clarified it has a 700R4 Automatic transmission. Further discussing functionalities, @Vic noted that the truck is equipped with turn signals, brake lights, and tail lights, but lacks seat belts.
Negative: There were a few comments that pointed out potential concerns about the vehicle's features or naming conventions. @RottenRattner quipped about the truck's classification, suggesting it should be referred to as a "6 window pickup." On the other hand, @itisonlymoney raised a cautionary note about safety by inquiring about the lack of seat belts, which could be a significant consideration for prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments indicate that the vehicle is generally well-received, particularly by @ZahorImport (The Seller), who emphasizes that the truck runs and drives great. They describe it as a "clean little unit" and express their willingness to assist potential buyers with any questions, creating a friendly and approachable atmosphere for prospective bidders.
Neutral: Commenter @woodsripper raises a question about a specific picture, inquiring whether the frame is cracked or if it's a reinforcing gusset instead. This suggests that potential buyers are taking a close look at the condition of the vehicle and are seeking clarification on specific aspects of it, reflecting an active engagement with the listing.
Negative: While there are no outright negative comments, @ZahorImport (The Seller) notes that the muffler makes a bit of a louder sound than usual, which indicates that potential maintenance may be required in the future. This might raise concerns for some buyers about the vehicle's long-term upkeep and the necessity for repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @jamessmithy remarks on the increasing appreciation for unrestored cars, and @Dollycat3 praises the Packard Custom Eight Model 443, calling it absolutely perfect. @rvanderson shares positive experiences about the vehicle, stating it is rock solid, comfortable, and powerful, making it one of the most honest preservation cars. Other commentors, including @Collins4A and @56PackardMan, express admiration for the Packard, describing it as a stunning example with pure eye candy and urging the next owner to treat it appropriately. Overall, there is a general enthusiasm for the vehicle's historical significance and desirability among classic car enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Raffi, the seller, welcomes bidders and highlights the packard's rich history, noting it has run 17,000 miles under its current ownership without issue, which piques interest. Several other commenters share technical questions and observations about the Kellogg Tire Pump's functionality and the vehicle's driveability in modern traffic, with @arswaim highlighting curiosity about the driving experience while maintaining that the Packard likely copes well with contemporary road conditions. @MachineShopScott raises questions about the wheels and potential exhaust issues, indicating there's a mix of engagement on the specifics of the vehicle's features and history without strong biases leant towards promotion or criticism.
Negative: Despite the admiration, there are critiques as well. @berfinroy mentions disappointment about the seats being redone in vinyl, suggesting that it detracts from the car's original character. @MachineShopScott raises concerns about a possible exhaust leak, which leads to some doubt, and @Henderson1921 questions the originality of the paint, seeking clarity on whether any part was repainted. The mention of possible mechanical issues by @Axial_Flow also introduces an element of caution regarding the Packard's condition, as the possible need for a repair can affect buyer interest, countering the overall positive aura surrounding the auction.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters appreciate the nostalgia associated with the vehicle, particularly the cassette storage and the digital dashboard, which were considered advanced features in the mid-80s. @dj.koehler expressed fondness for the cassette storage, highlighting its appeal to those who miss that era. @robbiefarmer also recognizes the cassette storage and praises the car as a "nice gem." Overall, the sentiments indicate excitement about the car's unique features and its status as a survivor from a notable period in automotive history.
Neutral: The seller, @OregonClassics, actively engages with potential buyers by providing answers to various inquiries about the car. They clarify important details, such as the AC situation and the condition of fluids. Comments from other users like @AMX310 and @mrpotty contribute to discussions about the car's model specifications, functionality, and history, showcasing an informative exchange rather than strong opinions in either direction.
Negative: On the downside, some comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and reliability, especially given its age. @UscPhd97_ inquired about potential leaks and the state of the tires, while @UlrichWolf questioned marks on the hood. @dieselcoondog expressed frustration over affordability and acknowledged that the car, while deserving better, is not perfect. These comments reflect a wariness regarding the vehicle's maintenance and overall reliability, common concerns with older cars.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, particularly highlighting the stunning interior and the overall design. @elihbrown and @ozinus expressed admiration, calling it a "beautiful car" and "beautiful Panamera!" @JakePM lauded the vehicle as a "neat vehicle" with a tremendous color combination, noting that the silver exterior enhances the Porsche's body lines. The rare Marsala interior color has also been specifically praised by several commenters, with @roopiedoo describing it as "gorgeous" alongside the low mileage as a desirable feature. Overall, the positive sentiment speaks to both the beauty and rarity of the vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @1600veloce, provided comprehensive information about the 27k-Mile 2016 Porsche Panamera GTS, emphasizing the vehicle's condition and unique features. He assured potential buyers of the vehicle's details and transparency regarding its history, such as answering queries about the rare color and any potential scratches. @DanD04 requested confirmation about the car being an 'America Edition', while also inquiring about the high paint readings observed in pictures. Additionally, @17PP4ME asked if the car has paint protection film (PPF), leading to informative exchanges with @1600veloce addressing each concern.
Negative: Conversely, some comments reflect disappointment regarding the vehicle's exterior color, with @AliBabatheDon expressing frustration that the car is silver, especially against the backdrop of the gorgeous interior. There were also concerns raised by users like @Rambler_13 regarding potential repainting and scratches on the vehicle, questioning the integrity of the paintwork. @DanD04's inquiries about specific packages and paint readings suggest apprehensions that might deter potential buyers, indicating that the color and its maintenance might not appeal to all enthusiasts.
![]() |




































































































































