Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters generally regard the 1968 Shelby Mustang GT500KR as a stunning and impressive vehicle. @boaboyoz describes it as a 'wicked' specimen, praising the seller, @1600veloce, for bringing it to auction. Others like @Journeymanlineman highlight its cleanliness and beauty, while @68ShelbyKR expresses a fondness for such cars, asserting that this one will do well at auction. Commenters also appreciate the unique sound of the vehicle, with remarks praising its engine noise and driving experience, indicating a pleasurable connection to the car.
Neutral: The comments reflect a mix of interest and casual inquiries about the vehicle's specifics. @1600veloce, the seller, provides detailed information about the listing process on BaT and invites potential buyers for consultations or appointments. Multiple commenters engage with questions about the history and restoration of the car, with @Skisworld seeking clarity on past ownership while others like @Coralsnake clarify details about the vehicle's parts and assembly process, indicating a collaborative environment for discussing the vehicle's characteristics.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised regarding the history of the vehicle, especially by @Skisworld, who questions the past ownership and restoration details, suggesting that the number of previous owners might indicate potential issues. Comments from other users, such as @Mr.Gray and @oldcanuck, revolve around technical aspects that could affect the vehicle's integrity and value. Additionally, the mention of checking paint thickness with a metal watch band by a commenter (@1968Snakecar) reflected a lack of care that some see as concerning, leading to discussions about best practices in assessing car condition.
 |
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments about the vehicle are overwhelmingly positive, emphasizing its stunning beauty and uniqueness. @GDogg describes the car as a 'Fantastic Pure Blue Speedster' with an impressive color scheme, while @boaboyoz likens the Porsche 911 Speedster to a promised prince, calling it 'drop dead gorgeous'. @FIREBALL500 praises the vehicle as a 'stunning example' of a limited edition Porsche, suggesting that it has been well cared for and will surely delight its next owner. The aesthetic appeal and desirability of the car resonate well with many commenters, with @AJL1988 even recalling a memorable moment when first encountering the car at a display, indicating a strong admiration towards it.
Neutral: Some comments present neutral observations or queries about the vehicle. @Jusaur brings attention to a potential crack in the windshield; however, @tarponator1 (The Seller) clarifies that there are no such issues. A comment from @remoorejr questions the identity of the car, speculating it may be a 2011 model, which indicates some confusion regarding the specifics. @vbrad26 shows interest in the surfboard collection instead, which hints at the various interests of potential buyers.
Negative: Not all feedback was entirely positive, as @Triumph27 suggests the car appears to be primarily for show rather than driving due to its original tires, leading to concerns about its road readiness. @tarponator1 (The Seller) defends the vehicle’s originality, mentioning that the tires, while original, were checked and deemed suitable for occasional driving. Such comments reveal a tension between maintaining vintage authenticity and ensuring the vehicle is practical for use, with some users expressing skepticism regarding its condition despite the seller's reassurances.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed appreciation for the unique design and historical significance of the vehicle, noting its appeal as a homage to iconic cars. @brdwyray mentioned their personal experience with the car, highlighting its fun factor despite its imperfections. @matt_mason also praised the car, emphasizing the significance of its design and the immense challenge of replicating the original beauty of the pre-war Cord. Furthermore, @R2B1 shared an interesting backstory about Glenn Pray, the builder's commitment and creativity in constructing these versions, which garnered admiration. Overall, there is a clear appreciation for the car's aesthetic and the history behind its creation.
Neutral: Several comments provided informational insights about the vehicle and its parts, noting the potential challenges of sourcing unique components. Some individuals, like @CarFoolLane, questioned the platform used for the replica, suggesting it might be based on a '69 Ford. @Electraglider emphasized that while it's not a true replica, it carries its own historical merit. @GlenK commented on the proportions of the car, indicating that while he likes the design, it seems slightly off compared to the original. These neutral comments reflect a curiosity and the desire to understand more about the vehicle's construction and authenticity.
Negative: Though many comments highlighted the vehicle's unique characteristics, some pointed out flaws and concerns regarding its construction quality. @brdwyray expressed disappointment in the crude nature of the chassis, stressing that labeling it as 'homemade' would be an insult and cautioning potential buyers about its limitations. Additional critiques came from @wgiff51 and others who reflected on their past experiences with the car, often indicating that while the aesthetics may appeal, the overall execution and performance might not meet expectations. Overall, some commenters conveyed skepticism around the vehicle's build quality and operational reliability.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments praise the 1967 Bronco for its originality and aesthetic appeal. @Coah57 and @TopDeadCenter09 express admiration for the truck's good looks and originality, while @DougP describes it as a beautiful original example. @boaboyoz compliments the design, calling it a fabulous build and wishing good luck to the seller. The seller, @RCMotor, assures potential buyers of the vehicle's reliable performance, sharing his experience of storing and maintaining the Bronco for five years, which appeals to bidders looking for a well-cared-for classic vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments inquire about specific details regarding the truck, such as the engine's rebuild status and the intermittent function of the windshield wipers. @GPD43148 asks for engine information, which @RCMotor addresses by confirming he lacks records but asserts the engine runs well. @yankstrap seeks clarification about the wipers, prompting @RCMotor to investigate a suspected vacuum leak. Additionally, a user shares a personal anecdote about a similar repair, providing useful context for potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments highlight concerns about the vehicle's maintenance and functionality. @reinvnt notes the absence of a Marti report, which typically details a vehicle's authenticity, and @Dwait shares a negative experience regarding repairing vacuum wipers, suggesting it could be more complex than expected. @Chiefmanycars reminisces about his past vehicle's durability, implying a desire for a more robust build. Overall, while the Bronco garners much praise, issues related to functionality and maintenance are raised, leading to a balanced view.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GTRene complimented the vehicle's lovely color and wheel combination, while @Caleb348 expressed his admiration for the color, envisioning it as a great date night car. @ScorchOK praised the car's awesome looks and remarkable lines, emphasizing how stunning its color is. @PlayHARD shared that seeing the car in person confirmed its beauty, suggesting that the new owner would be very pleased. @Tyracious echoed the sentiment by saying the car is in incredible condition and commended its maintenance, highlighting that it is well-made with a stiffer chassis compared to its competitors. @Lotusfan also noted the excellent addition of a 5-speed conversion, declaring it a fantastic looking early TVR.
Neutral: @StantonGTI, the seller, responded to various questions regarding the vehicle, confirming that it has its original engine that has been overhauled and addressing inquiries about the fuel tank and other mechanical aspects. He acknowledged that obtaining a tank photo wasn’t feasible during the auction but assured potential buyers that the current owner had maintained the car well. @Olivier145 raised questions about the condition of the amps gauge and sought clarity on the gearbox ratio, to which @StantonGTI provided explanations and details about the original gauges in the car. @BFC highlighted the minor imperfections in the restoration, stating that overall the car looks terrific and has held up well over the years.
Negative: @BFC questioned the accuracy of the stated redline of 8k RPM, indicating a possible inaccuracy in the information shared. @BritV8s inquired about the originality of the fuel tank, expressing concern over its mounting and condition. @PinkStang2290 raised doubts about the vehicle's reliability for long-distance travel, wanting assurance regarding its performance on longer journeys. @RichardPetty asked about the dual rear shocks and their functionality, illustrating a bit of trepidation regarding the vehicle's design elements. There was a consensus among some commentators about the minor flaws but a strong appreciation for the overall condition and charm of the car, indicating that while there are concerns, they are relatively minor compared to the overall appeal.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dunner53 remarked on the vehicle's beauty and noted his nostalgia for a similar model he owned in 1970. He appreciated the improvements made to the car, including updates to the alternator, cooling fan, and gauges, although he expressed curiosity about the lack of a motor or transmission rebuild. Commenting on the paint color, he considered it attractive but suggested that a darker shade might enhance its appeal even more. @Rpharesjr shared a personal connection to a similar vehicle, highlighting its originality and expressing curiosity about the auction outcome. @GMTV_GIVEMETHEVIN, the seller, invited potential buyers to ask questions and described the 1950 Dodge Coronet as a classic vehicle with a blend of vintage charm and modern updates, emphasizing its solid platform for collectors and restorers.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the vehicle's features and history. @David_P reminisced about family connections to the model, recalling fond memories associated with his relatives who owned a similar car. @PVSlim inquired about the car's starting and running conditions, while @RC559 requested a driving video for a more comprehensive look at the vehicle in motion. @GMTV_GIVEMETHEVIN confirmed that the car starts and runs smoothly but mentioned some issues with the clutch, indicating there are areas needing attention.
Negative: On the downside, @Dunner53 critiqued the absence of a rebuild for the motor and transmission, questioning the decision not to repair the clutch, given the car's mileage nearing 100,000. The concerns about the clutch were reiterated by @GMTV_GIVEMETHEVIN, who acknowledged the issue of having to pull the clutch back up once it is depressed. Additionally, @76Chevelle's comments included some negativity towards the vehicle's quality, with comments that hinted at dissatisfaction, though the context was not entirely clear. Furthermore, @76Chevelle also referenced other unrelated vehicles in an unfavorable manner, suggesting a critical stance on the marketplace this particular vehicle is a part of.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express their admiration for the 1994 Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo, with @nexusautobrokers calling it a "MUST have for a Z fan!" and @usdcrs remarking on its great value in comparison to previous sales. Enthusiasts like @FastCarLover74 and @Jrsneed1 share their excitement, with one describing it as "gorgeous" and another noting its lasting confusion over past auction prices, while still expressing hope for a successful outcome. Cars mentioned in the auction maintain a strong following, highlighting the community's appreciation for this iconic model.
Neutral: Many commentators discuss the recent auction history of the vehicle, with @AJBRAMI reminiscing about watching the auction live and @rmp5s noting their interest in viewing the car. @doletron raises a question regarding a specific modification (Phase 2 upper plenum), prompting a discussion about its authenticity and modification history, indicating that such details can influence buyer perceptions. There are realistic assessments of the auction's potential outcomes, with predictions of a sale price between $40k to $60k based on current market conditions and prior sales.
Negative: Conversely, some commenters express skepticism about the current market for Z32s. @Knuckles-R-Busted admits uncertainty about whether previous buyers will get their money back, while @MR2Guy reflects on the depreciation of such vehicles since the height of the COVID market. Additionally, @JLopeZ32 expresses surprise about modifications made to the car post-ownership and questions the need for additional services after it had been meticulously cared for by @Narbeh in the past. The shifting demand for 90s sports cars like this one is also noted, with some participants seeing a declining trend in valuations.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have shared their appreciation for the vehicle's reliability and enjoyable driving experience. @CarFoolLane noted that the A/C worked flawlessly even in hot weather, which @Mhoogend123 (The Seller) confirmed, stating that the car performs well during hot days. Additionally, @fotontom expressed confidence that buyers would enjoy many happy miles with the car, while @Markusoneill highlighted the 2005/06 Cooper's great power-to-weight ratio, making it a fun commuter car. Overall, the consensus is that this Mini offers dependable performance and a pleasant driving experience.
Neutral: Several commenters asked for clarification on specific features and conditions of the vehicle. @Bdpruett inquired about the presence of cruise control and tire age, while @Driver693 sought confirmation about potential oil issues observed in the photos. @Jim asked for better pictures of the underside of the car, and @marty27310 requested images of the headliner sagging. @julios1234 raised questions regarding the tax and registration process for a Texas resident purchasing out-of-state, which @Mhoogend123 (The Seller) addressed clearly, ensuring transparency about the logistics of the sale.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, there are some concerns raised by potential buyers. @Driver693 worried about possible oil pooling near the tire, which @Mhoogend123 resolved by confirming it was just water from washing. Additionally, @Markusoneill noted that the car appears to need a headliner replacement, stating it was a job he had previously done himself. These points indicate that while the vehicle has many positives, issues like the headliner sag could be perceived as drawbacks for some buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Nvuskid expressed excitement about the vehicle, calling it an "awesome ZR-1." @nexusautobrokers highlighted that it is currently 'ZR1 season' on BAT, which could indicate increased interest and competition. Additionally, @GSmittySmith expressed a personal connection by hoping not to see another 2011 model in Blade Silver that would match his own ZR1, noting he would "own this in a heartbeat" and deeming it a "wicked cool car."
Neutral: Comments from @newcarpro provided an extensive vehicle profile, detailing its build and options, which indicates the car is well-documented and supported. @Ronson68L78 mentioned the presence of multiple ZR1 vehicles listed at the same time on BaT, suggesting it may impact seller success, but also noted the incredible nature of these cars. @GSmittySmith acknowledged the blue contrast in the interior, showing varied tastes in design that can be appreciated despite personal preferences.
Negative: @Corvettekent lamented the excessive "bling" added to the low mileage ZR1, suggesting it may detract from its value and functionality, and believed it would require upholstery work. @Ronson68L78 criticized the simultaneity of three C6 ZR1 listings as potentially detrimental, indicating the market might be overly saturated. The mixed feelings about the car's modifications reflect a concern about maintaining its original character and market value.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's unique build and attention to detail. @carja01 called it 'so cool', while @Nichole930 praised its safari-inspired design and wished the seller good luck with the auction. Multiple users, including @agentbell4272 and @texaco, highlighted the creativity and execution of the build, particularly praising features like the 'giraffe' and the thoughtful modifications made by the seller, @szlaughlin. There's a general consensus that the car is a fun and purposeful creation, with @rhMIA describing it as hitting all the right notes for a safari build. The seller also received compliments for their engagement and transparency in answering potential buyers' questions.
Neutral: The seller, @szlaughlin, provided extensive insights into the vehicle's features, previous ownership, and modifications. They explained the installation of an IMS kit and the reasoning behind it, mentioning that it comes with service history from the prior owner, a retired Navy EOD tech. The seller disclosed current issues, such as a minor leak possibly related to the RMS, and reassured potential buyers that they are keen to discuss solutions. The conversation also included technical aspects of the build, such as the choice of the rally light pod and its impact on the vehicle's performance, with @davcar24 inquiring about its effect on speed and drag.
Negative: There were some concerns voiced by users about potential mechanical issues. @Pace_Adorno pointed out a leak noted in the listing, asking about its severity, to which @szlaughlin responded with reassurance based on inspections made by a local shop. @camarocane raised doubts about the RMS versus IMS leak explanation, sharing a personal experience that brought up questions of trust around the seller's disclosure. Overall, while the majority of comments were positive, the few critiques focused on specific aspects of the vehicle’s mechanical condition raised by potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg called the Defender 90 fantastic and noted the wood addition as a cool feature, indicating a positive perception of the vehicle's unique qualities. Many comments reflected excitement about the truck, suggesting it has appealing aesthetic and functional characteristics that resonate well with fans of the model.
Neutral: @1600VeloceAssist (The Seller) explained the auction process, emphasizing the support provided to potential buyers and the transparency of information about the vehicle. @Dallas_Gabe raised a question about the year discrepancy regarding the vehicle's model year noted in the title, prompting an informative response from the seller that included clarification on VIN decoding and registration details.
Negative: @discobri criticized the vehicle for various issues, including mismatched paint, seat damage, and oil leaks, raising concerns over its condition. @Mtish18 inquired specifically about any operational issues with the truck suggesting some skepticism about its performance, indicating that potential buyers may have reservations based on the reported condition and wear.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @DianaR (The Seller) clarified that the engine displacement is 1641cc with 87 pistons, which was confirmed by @jcmiller. The car features an IRS suspension, and recent photos of the underside were shared to give potential buyers a clearer view. Also, there is a mention of a custom exhaust system that enhances the vehicle's appeal. These details provide assurance to those considering purchasing the vehicle that it meets certain performance standards, and the driving videos shared by @LouFifer add a nostalgic touch that resonates with VW enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters such as @Govertit and @hvolks pointed out the model year of the car, with @hvolks correctly identifying it as a 1970 based on the VIN. Questions were raised about the specific features of the vehicle like the type of transaxle and engine specifications. Discussion around the bumper discrepancies was noted, particularly regarding their origins, with references made to the trends of backdating Beetle appearances to make them look more classic, as mentioned by @Chrispc.
Negative: Concerns were expressed regarding certain features of the vehicle, especially whether it includes typical components such as a heater, which could affect its functionality in specific climates. @LouFifer highlighted that the absence of a heater box might be a drawback for North American buyers, emphasizing the inadequacies in features from South American production lines. Additionally, @vwcrewman raised a potential overheating issue related to the fresh air tubes and exhaust placement, indicating possible efficiency problems that could deter buyers.
|
304-Powered 1968 International Harvester Scout 800 4×4 3-Speed Project
781925G303893
Lot 199535
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @blw0924 expressed love for the Scout's colors, calling it a delightful little vehicle. @calereeves found it to be a cool project, noting that the required work seems manageable for a hobbyist. @Tom_S. described the vehicle as adorable, while @Micahd referred to it as a cute trucklet, showing overall enthusiasm for its appeal.
Neutral: @1600VeloceAssist (The Seller) provided thorough information about the auction process and the vehicle's conditions, explaining that the Scout is being sold as a project with new disclosures being made. @Jumpdunk asked about the inspection report and remarked how it might require more extensive work, although he liked the colors. @Gary_T1 countered this by suggesting that the project requires less work than implied, indicating a potential for it to be a reliable everyday vehicle.
Negative: @Jumpdunk raised concerns about possible hidden issues with the vehicle, suggesting it might need a complete tear-down, while @Emelton24 acknowledged existing problems but saw potential. @Emelton24 also sought clarification on the steering issue, implying there are functionality concerns that could detract from the vehicle's attractiveness. @genejockey questioned the ownership documentation, indicating a potential complication in obtaining a standard title that may deter interested buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @4wheelfreaks, the seller, expresses excitement about presenting this rare classic truck to the community, showcasing the passion put into its restoration. @rosenjeni describes it as an awesome little truck, while @Kie praises its beautiful design. Enthusiasts like @SupraFreak highlight the unique nature of the truck and appreciate its customizations, indicating it will be perfect for the right buyer. @PWSchuh humorously notes the impressive breakover angle, further complimenting the vehicle's capability.
Neutral: Commenters share their opinions on specific elements of the truck. @CarFoolLane initially wonders if the vehicle is from a movie due to its striking appearance. @LongDucDong finds the truck bizarre yet cool, inquiring about the shifter extension. @4wheelfreaks clarifies details about the custom-made airbox, emphasizing its secure construction and inviting interest in its design plans. @thealmccloud mentions a preference for a longer shifting lever, suggesting a mix of personal preferences among the comments.
Negative: @cwsteel suggests the truck 'needs more tire,' indicating a potential concern about its current setup. This comment hints that some viewers might perceive adjustments are necessary for optimal performance. Overall, while the general tone is positive, there are specific critiques regarding certain parts that could be improved to suit different perspectives.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @DetrahoTectum praises the project, likening it to early Bring a Trailer and noting its resemblance to a Lister Knobbly. @Wrayg mentions the excitement of interesting cars in the area, expressing admiration for the vehicle's history. @AlpineJay appreciates the commentary available on the seller's website, finding the information valuable for understanding the car's past and its various components.
Neutral: @gareyg inquires if the car participated in the Monterey Historics, while @Dave_at_OldSchool asks relevant questions about the structure, including doors and hinges. @ponobill (The Seller) answers questions in detail about the vehicle, discussing the modifications it has undergone and sharing the links to a website with additional information about the car's history, including pictures and maintenance details.
Negative: @AlpineJay expresses disappointment that the original body isn't part of the sale and comments on the discrepancies with the vehicle's historical authenticity based on its parts. @Lucky30 raises concerns about the modifications to the steering rack and control arms, suggesting they may not adhere to the original specifications. @Mcfling questions the completeness of the bodywork, expressing uncertainty about its readiness for a vintage racing environment.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @9literviper thinks the vehicle is very cool and questions the rarity of Gen 2's on MSO, while @DFlanagan describes the Viper as one hell of a sweet car. @RR2017 appreciates the seller's great communication and also expresses gratitude for the thorough responses regarding the vehicle's condition. Additionally, the car's excellent storage conditions and maintenance history contribute positively to its perceived value.
Neutral: @newcarpro provides a detailed vehicle description, listing standard and optional equipment, such as the 8.0L V10 SFI engine and leather-trimmed bucket seats. @ZmotorsTN, the seller, is acknowledged for addressing inquiries and ensuring the car is kept well, along with the unique specifications it meets for the U.S. market. @JohnnyKo7 raises a question about potential damage under the nose, pointing out concerns that arise with cars that have seen use.
Negative: @JohnnyKo7 jokingly implies that there is typically damage under the nose of performance cars unless they are kept as museum pieces, casting doubt on the seller's claims of the car's pristine condition. The inquiry from @RR2017 about various aspects of the car suggests a degree of skepticism about its upkeep, while the concerns expressed about wanting additional videos and proof reinforce potential apprehensions from interested buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @cboulware, @GDogg, and @Polarstar all express high praise for the Jaguar XF Sportbrake, highlighting it as an excellent sport wagon. @GDogg appreciates the car's aesthetic appeal, noting that it looks great in its color specification. @cboulware loves the model, confirming it lives up to expectations regarding performance and quality. @Rich_Truett argues that the Jaguar XF Sportbrake is one of the best-looking and performing cars from Jaguar, reflecting a sentiment echoed by other owners like @SKBaruah, who praises its rarity and beauty.
Neutral: @JuhaMikkola (The Seller) enthusiastically shares his personal experience with the vehicle, noting its exceptional performance and smoothness over highway miles. He mentions that it has been faultless during his ownership, reinforcing the car's desirability. However, he also addresses some mechanical aspects, including service inquiries regarding rear brake pads and rotors, which @KCH and @oldkid6 discuss; they clarify the limitations of factory warranties on wear items.
Negative: Despite the overall appeal, there are minor concerns highlighted by users like @jsangerman, who points out small blemishes on the vehicle, such as wear marks on the rear bumper and gaps in the exhaust and tailgate alignment. @BorisB mentions that the brakes may be subject to heavy wear, which aligns with his experience of needing replacements sooner than expected. @Y2K911 suggests it would be beneficial to include images of the cargo area, indicating some potential buyer interest in the practical aspects of the vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @702e30girl finds these vehicles uniquely cool, noting they stand out at car events like Cars and Coffee. @PhilO reminisces about their own experience with a similar AMC model, expressing fondness for this specific example and wishing the seller good luck. It’s highlighted that the vehicle is indeed a testament to AMC’s innovative spirit and resonates well with car enthusiasts, as @JohnF1966 recognizes it as a car ahead of its time.
Neutral: The seller, @metmot53, provides updates and answers questions about the vehicle's condition, including repairs made to the boot and shaft, and the current state of surface rust on the underbody as mentioned by @GoHawks63. Several users comment on its historical significance in automotive evolution, acknowledging it as a pioneering crossover, while others share personal anecdotes related to the brand and similar models, like @Isosceles who notes AMC's foresight with this car design.
Negative: Some users express skepticism regarding specific claims about the vehicle, like @GoremanX who insists on more precise terminology concerning components. @fakesneezes raises concerns about the vehicle’s mileage accuracy based on the Carfax report history, adding that pre-1996 records of mileage are unclear. @wallytoo points out issues with aftermarket fuel pumps, indicating potential reliability concerns that may affect the ownership experience.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Kato expressed excitement about the vehicle, calling it their "dream" after previously owning a B5 S4, and noted how rare it is for such a model to appear on BAT so soon. @TheKosherStogie appreciated the vehicle's aesthetic and nostalgic value, remembering the fun they had with similar models in the past. @zbaylis thinks the next buyer of this car is incredibly lucky, while @E_F_III praised its solid provenance, showing trust and admiration for its history.
Neutral: @VetteFish (The Seller) provided a detailed history of the vehicle's importation and mechanical updates, sharing his bittersweet feelings about selling it now that it’s eligible for import to the US. Other users discussed practicality concerns, with @sidud mentioning the small back seats and @bingS4 countering that they found them comfortable depending on the position of the front seats. Comments also touched on the registration challenges in California and the vehicle's condition after mechanical inspection, with varying opinions on the decision not to replace the timing belt right away.
Negative: @RudyR raised concerns regarding the mechanical maintenance of the car, questioning the decision to replace turbochargers while leaving the timing belt alone, which they considered an oversight. @sprchng and @gdlasalle debated this point, discussing maintenance priorities and procedures, leading to some tension within the comments. Overall, there were some apprehensive views on the perceived oversight regarding timing belt replacement compared to the service done, reflecting different standards among the car community.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Beans_Bacon expressed a strong affection for the vehicle, highlighting its appealing features, while @boaboyoz described it as a cool California El Camino and noted its delightful orange color. @Ridein20 also praised the El Camino, indicating a positive overall impression. The seller, @JohnHellen, detailed extensive work done on the car, including a thorough rebuild of the 350 V8 engine, ensuring the vehicle could be driven daily and displayed at events. He also mentioned that the car has been driven periodically and is well-maintained within his collection.
Neutral: Several commenters showed curiosity about the vehicle's condition and required details, like @Prairie-sky inquiring about the 350 V8's age and condition, and @MMDbat asking whether the air conditioning system works. Questions about DMV registration fees and responsibilities were a common theme, with various users seeking clarification from @JohnHellen about potential back fees and their implications on out-of-state buyers. @Michael1327 sought further understanding of tax issues related to the car's sale, while other users discussed transport costs, comparing them among regions.
Negative: On the downside, some users expressed concerns regarding potential back fees owed to the DMV, with @Frank1951 stating that these fees could exceed the car's value. There was also confusion surrounding the responsibility for these fees, with users like @jsjodin and @Kiddoskid19 directly addressing @JohnHellen for clearer communication on the matter. @WIZZZZ and others pointedly discussed the vehicle's potential for leaks, with users concerned about the car's operational state, indicating a few red flags for potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express a fondness for the vehicle, highlighting it as a great model of Mercedes-Benz. @bentleyboy29 mentions their own similar car as a delight to drive, reflecting a positive sentiment towards the model. @kmccarthy16 appreciates the sound of the car post-catalytic converter removal, describing it as beautifully balanced and wishing good luck to potential bidders, which adds to a warm sentiment surrounding the car's enjoyment among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters seek clarification on various aspects of the car, indicating a level of interest but also some uncertainty. @Lubedude1 asks for recent pictures and mileage details, while @macroni inquires about the functionality of the AC and the absence of top-down pictures. @1969camaro raises important questions regarding EPA and DOT compliance for insurance purposes, while others discuss the car’s exhaust system and general conditions, indicating genuine curiosity about the vehicle’s specifications and condition.
Negative: On the negative side, there are concerns raised about the car's compliance with US regulations. @1969camaro highlights potential insurance issues with Euro cars lacking proper documentation, showing skepticism about the vehicle's insurability. Their further questions about power steering and the exhaust system suggest doubts about the car’s condition. Additionally, there are worries about the age of the tires, as @Jcbsat asks for the date code, hinting at a sense of caution about the car’s overall maintenance and safety.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a stunning example of automotive design. @AlextheCatGroomerllc praised the opening picture of the car, while @GDogg referred to it as an 'absolutely stunning DB9 Coupe.' @SeaTacTom and @Arh23 echoed these sentiments, with @SeaTacTom calling it a 'beautiful example of rolling art,' and @Arh23 describing it as a 'work of art' with incredible fit and finish. The seller, @TripleKnights, engaged positively with the community, sharing updates and responding to inquiries about the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments brought up specific questions regarding the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @WisdomFirst asked about the paint gap on the passenger side and requested video of the exhaust on startup. @distributorguy noted the potential repainting of the front clip and suggested the seller use a paint meter to ensure authenticity. The seller promptly responded, addressing concerns about the paint condition and indicating that he would provide the requested information and videos to maintain transparency with potential bidders.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's cosmetic condition, particularly regarding the paint and body alignment. @Doug78 pointed out noticeable differences in paint quality between the front and back sections of the car, and asked for more pictures in natural light. Additionally, @WisdomFirst and @Doug78 queried about the operational status of the parking brake and the history of parts like the coils and dipstick. Overall, while there were many compliments about the vehicle, there were also significant questions about its maintenance and repair records that the seller aimed to clarify.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Series6 described riding this bike as life-changing, indicating a strong emotional connection to the experience. @Nate echoed that sentiment, stating the bike can transform any rider’s life, noting its appeal to those who are passionate about riding. @Maxwell077 praised the motorcycle as a cult classic, celebrating its unique characteristics and reliability when well-maintained, while @siatarick shared experiences of extensive travel on a similar model, praising its dependability and the ease of repairs due to its simpler mechanics.
Neutral: @TheBMWGuy asked for additional detail photos of the bike's pushrod seals and inside the headlight bucket, indicating a focus on condition verification. @Maxwell077 questioned the higher shipping costs associated with the bike as opposed to a car, prompting insights from @Ant5842 about the logistical challenges involved in shipping. Several comments highlighted a range of inquiries regarding transport options, with @kvg_nair assuming pickup might be available instead of shipping.
Negative: @Nate expressed frustration about the lack of bidding activity on this appealing motorcycle during the summer, indicating concerns about its marketability. He pointed out normal oil seepage issues with the pushrod seals, which could deter potential buyers. @TheBMWGuy also raised a question about whether the bike could be driven home, implying possible concerns about its roadworthiness, although @rkbbmw75 (The Seller) assured potential buyers that it was certainly drivable.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @cjs66Mustang praised the truck's outstanding shape and noted the great color combination, expressing confidence that it would sell for a decent price given current new truck costs. @eddie046 shared nostalgic feelings about the GMT400 trucks from the 90s, stating they were all great and that this particular truck still looks amazing today. Additionally, @TroyAxe commented on the truck's nice condition, indicating that the winner of the auction would be acquiring a clean vehicle. @aw2245 also shared a preview experience, attesting to the seller's good character and the truck's quality, further emphasizing the seller's credibility.
Neutral: @JayKay2430 noted that the truck's color was popular in the early 1990s and still looks good today, while @GMT400Man echoed this sentiment, discussing how these trucks seem not to age and can even look better than newer models. @Chipper55 remarked on the quality of the videos without directly linking it to the truck's characteristics but confirmed the content was well-received. @Mrnobodyk9, the seller, engaged positively with commenters, acknowledging their remarks and sharing a light-hearted comment about enjoying ice cream, which adds a light and friendly tone to the overall interaction.
Negative: Comments were generally positive, with no significant negative feedback about the truck itself noted in the excerpts provided. The opinions shared were focused on admiration and nostalgia for the vehicle type, with no complaints or criticisms highlighted, indicating a strong appreciation among the commenters.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments about the vehicle include a recognition of its beautiful restoration, with @Premierautofl highlighting their excitement for the sale and willingness to assist buyers with transport. @VintageBikesUSA praised the bike for being restored correctly, mentioning specific details like the Bridgestone Tires and owner's manual. This bike has a positive reputation from previous sales, indicating a strong interest from potential buyers. @Rpl1 and @solidlifters also expressed enthusiasm for the viewing and potential purchase, with @Rpl1 specifically mentioning their thanks for further engagement from the seller.
Neutral: Several users inquired about details regarding the CT70H, with @Wesley1963 asking for a cold start and riding video, and @Rpl1 requesting a picture of the motor serial number. @Bella9119 pointed out a previous listing as a source of information, which shows that potential buyers are actively engaged in the discussion about its specifications and historical performance on the market. @Premierautofl maintained an open line of communication, indicating that they would gather requested information and video content to help buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the condition of the bike with @solidlifters questioning the nature of white spots on the side cover and chain guard. This indicates there may be some uncertainties regarding the bike's condition. Additionally, there was a personal remark from @FboyJ that seemed out of place, which could hint at a misinterpretation or distraction amidst the serious inquiries about the vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments showcase excitement about the unique Audi R8 GT Spyder, particularly noting its rarity as one of an estimated 33 units in the USA. @nexusautobrokers, the seller, expresses enthusiasm, indicating the vehicle is fully spec’d and has ultra-low miles, enhancing its appeal. Multiple commenters admire its clean condition and original features, such as its striking color combination and premium options like the Bang & Olufsen sound system, gleaming carbon fiber accents, and a high MSRP of $240,160. Overall, the car is viewed as a beautiful luxury vehicle that will be competitive in bidding.
Neutral: The conversation includes questions from potential buyers seeking specific information about the car's location, shipping options, and factory specifications. @rob_trackhawk inquires about conversion costs for a gated manual transmission, highlighting an interest in tailoring the vehicle to personal preferences. Additionally, @Tony1961 seeks clarity regarding the vehicle's paint condition, confirming that detailed paint meter readings have since been added to the listing. The discussion around the limited number of units and manufacturing details helps frame the car's exclusivity.
Negative: Some buyers raise concerns that the advertised specifications may not fully align with the car's actual availability, questioning the exact number of R8 GT Spyders present in the USA. @RNLabas disputes the seller's claim about the car's rarity, providing additional context from his own research which states a higher number of models were sold. Furthermore, inquiries about features such as backup cameras and paint protection film indicate a desire for thoroughness that the seller may not have addressed adequately, leaving some buyers needing more specific answers before making bids.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters are expressing admiration for the vehicle, praising its beauty and original condition. @Dollycat3 describes the Impala as 'gorgeous' and appreciates the color combination. @Imperialist67 notes the appealing qualities of the well-loved sedan, highlighting its solid build and carefully chosen options like the V-8 engine and factory AC. @PDXBryan shares nostalgic memories of a similar car from his father's past, emphasizing the luxurious driving experience it provided. Both @FiveOBill and @Chefgordiemac echo sentiments of fond memories, with @FiveOBill noting his own pristine 1968 Biscayne sedan and wishing for a great auction result.
Neutral: Several comments delve into the history and specifications of the car. @tonic33 (The Seller) provides background information about the vehicle's history, confirming it had a white roof previously and discussing the restoration choices made. Commenters like @carfan1978 ask about the car's history while @tar6569 notes its low VIN and early build status, indicating its rarity. @David_P and @morrisminiman engage in discussion about safety features and condition specifics of the interiors, highlighting the attention to detail that potential buyers might want to understand better. Overall, these comments portray a balanced view of the car's provenance and condition.
Negative: Conversely, there are some criticisms and concerns raised by a few users. @JohnF1966 describes the car's paint job as 'amateur,' questioning the quality of the restoration work while @redboots warns that the driving experience of classic cars may not hold up to modern expectations, comparing the Impala unfavorably with his experience in a 1966 Nova SS. Additionally, @morrisminiman points out some discrepancies in the condition of the seats and instrument panel splits, expressing a desire for additional clarification on these aspects. Overall, while there is a general appreciation for the car, there are valid concerns regarding its restoration quality and usability.
|
1996 Chevrolet Corvette Coupe Collector Edition LT4 6-Speed
1G1YY2252T5104327
Lot 199558
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @16HWSS recalls owning a similar model for a decade and expresses regret over parting with it due to financial reasons. They highlight the rarity of the 1996 Collector Edition Coupes, emphasizing specific details that make the car special. @98WS6 shares their admiration for the vehicle, stating it's their favorite C4, reflecting a positive sentiment towards its desirability.
Neutral: @Bert96 (The Seller) addresses inquiries from @josephDAZ regarding service records, mentioning limited recent documentation as previous ownership was held by a Corvette collector who performed personal service. He also provides updates on oil changes, brake conditions, and confirms the LT4 stripe on the hood is a sticker rather than paint. Concerning the wheels, @Bert96 clarifies they are factory rims, despite @RacingJunkie's challenge on their authenticity, agreeing to provide additional information as needed.
Negative: @RacingJunkie criticizes the wheel authenticity, asserting that they are aftermarket, and questions why they were replaced at low mileage. This is reiterated by @Z07Vette, who mentions the wheels are replicas without disparaging the car itself. @Bert96 acknowledges the misconception about the wheels being aftermarket, expressing regret for the oversight and offering to address further questions on the car's authenticity.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received praise for its engaging driving experience, particularly highlighted by @FordsFTW (The Seller) stating it feels like a "go-kart" with amazing visceral rewards even at lower speeds. The modifications made, including H&R lowering springs and Bilstein shocks, have enhanced the performance and handling without compromising comfort too much, although the ride is a bit stiffer. The owner expresses great pride in the vehicle, noting its unique appeal that often garners attention from onlookers, and emphasizes that it delivers exceptional performance while also representing a great value for a sports car.
Neutral: Inquiries from potential buyers, such as @FlyPenFly, focus on specifics like oil change history, the status of the stock catalytic converter, and potential issues following modifications. The seller has been transparent, sharing that regular maintenance has been performed, including engine and gear oil changes, and details about the car's handling characteristics post-modification. The alignment status was discussed, clarifying that while the car might necessitate different alignment adjustments due to lowered suspension, the seller has had no significant issues confirmed by a local shop after initial adjustments were dealt with.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's condition, including potential alignment issues indicated in the Carfax by @FlyPenFly, and a history of airbag control module recalls that @Cecheng90 highlighted, which the seller confirmed had not yet been addressed. Additionally, some wear on the driver’s seat has been noted, though @FordsFTW assured it is minor. Other issues discussed include the lack of the original muffler as the current setup is more performance-oriented but may not suit everyone's preference.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters have expressed strong nostalgia and affection for the vehicle, highlighting its engineering and the memories associated with it. @jimhowestl described the car as 'Nice!' while @Attila73 recalled fond memories of similar cars from childhood, sharing experiences of road trips across Europe. @GDogg noted the vehicle's impressive engineering, reminiscing about their own experience with a similar model and wishing the seller well. Additionally, @bondgraham mentioned having preserved a Mercedes Diesel for decades, emphasizing the car's timeless appeal and durability, and @wally509 highlighted the quality of the tires purchased for the car, commending the effort put into its maintenance.
Neutral: The seller, @PSAnton, provided informative responses to several inquiries about the car's condition and performance. They mentioned the car's clutch behavior, saying it shudders slightly but isn't slipping, and detailed the costs associated with potential repairs, including quotes for the instrument light and odometer fixes. They also explained the car's cold weather performance, noting it can blow smoke at lower temperatures but generally runs well. The seller engaged positively with questions from potential buyers and shared history and technical details about the vehicle, including its distance traveled and previous ownership experiences.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the car's physical condition, particularly @carstruck, who pointed out a dent on the trunk lid and questioned the repair strategy. @ljsense asked for detailed estimates regarding various issues, suggesting potential problems with the clutch and heater fan. @mrfrederikson speculated on the odometer reading, suggesting it might be considerably higher than indicated, which led to potential doubts about the vehicle's overall reliability. Furthermore, @TRAVELL noted that many watchers might be hesitant to bid, potentially due to these concerns about the car's condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @tlcamg appreciates the vehicle's aux fuel tank, noting that it enhances travel range significantly. He also admires the overall appearance and versatility of the rig. @Chamba expresses strong admiration for the build and specifically mentions the nice touch of the aux tank filler, though suggests a change to the seats for personal preference. @timberframe finds the vehicle visually appealing and asks for more information on the half doors, while @overton simply gushes about the vehicle's aesthetics with a positive remark about its year.
Neutral: @AJMaustintexas (The Seller) responds to @timberframe's query regarding the half doors, confirming that they are made by Bestop and promises to provide further information. The seller also reassures @OFritz3 that an inspection and test drive can be arranged before the auction ends, despite weather challenges affecting communication. Additionally, @Chamba receives confirmation from the seller about the original nature of the rear lip and awaits more details about the parking brake setup, continuing to engage in a constructive dialogue about the vehicle.
Negative: @RICKSANSOM voices a concern about the absence of driving and cold crank videos, indicating that such footage would be crucial for potential buyers. He repeats his request for these videos to emphasize their importance in the auction. Similarly, @Sunna asks for drive videos, reflecting on the need for additional visual confirmations about the car's performance. @Chamba echoes this sentiment by questioning why such videos have not yet been provided, suggesting a general view that the lack of video evidence could hinder the sale.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express interest in the vehicle, highlighting the brand Daihatsu and confirming its classification as a kei truck. Some users are engaging with the seller's comments to clarify aspects of the vehicle and its registration status, indicating that there is a community interested in this type of vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @TokyoMotorsDC, provides important information regarding the registration of kei trucks in Maryland, particularly the new regulations that affect vehicles from model year 2000 and newer. They communicate clearly that these vehicles can only be sold for specific uses within state limits, which emphasizes the legal considerations prospective buyers need to keep in mind.
Negative: @ducttape raises a concern questioning whether this vehicle is a kei or a Daihatsu and mentions registration issues in New York, indicating uncertainty around the legality of such vehicles. Additionally, @QuickStrike queries the permanence of the 1999 cutoff for historic tags in Maryland, suggesting confusion or frustration among potential buyers regarding how the law impacts ownership.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Numerous commenters expressed positive sentiments about the 1979 Dodge Magnum XE, emphasizing its uniqueness and significance in automotive history. @CarFoolLane praised Chrysler for maintaining the 'Magnum' name, symbolic of strength and power, while also noting the rarity of such vehicles at car gatherings. The outstanding options and features of the car were highlighted by @dodgefan, who mentioned its unique characteristics and well-equipped features. Commenters like @roger.noble and @CarDogThreePedals appreciated the car's aesthetic appeal and luxury, with @roger.noble referring to it as a '47-year time capsule'. Overall, the Magnum is regarded as a beautiful and well-cared-for vehicle, worthy of admiration.
Neutral: Several comments provided neutral or factual insights, particularly concerning the car's production history and design features. @E.L.Cord pointed out the limited production of the Magnum, noting that only about 25,000 units were made in 1979, making it a collectible item. @LorenPaul shared personal experiences and technical observations about the vehicle's headlights, while @dodgefan discussed typical design traits of the era's vehicles. The car's comfort on road trips was also mentioned, with @Rajunz reminiscing about his own experiences with a Magnum. @Competitioncars, the seller, actively engaged with the comments, providing additional information and expressing appreciation for shared insights.
Negative: On the downside, some comments raised concerns about certain design elements and the car's failure to achieve commercial success. @dirkrowdies noted the decline in the availability of stylish coupes, emphasizing that cars like the Magnum have largely disappeared from modern lineups, which he attributes to changing consumer preferences. @LorenPaul remarked on the impracticality of the vehicle's rotating headlight covers in snowy conditions, disclosing a personal frustration from his own ownership experience. @58ghia speculated that Dodge's attempt to compete with popular models like the Cutlass did not yield successful sales figures, which may have contributed to the Magnum's limited legacy. Overall, while the car is appreciated for its cool features, some expressed disappointment regarding its commercial viability and performance in the market.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as a "very cool Porsche tractor" and complimenting the pictures shared. He also requested a cold start video, showing interest in its operation. @switchcars, the seller, followed up by providing a starting and operation video, demonstrating responsiveness to inquiries and further engaging potential buyers.
Neutral: @hangar911 inquired about shipping options for tractors, indicating an interest in logistics. @Plenkov contributed to the conversation by sharing a personal experience of shipping a Lamborghini tractor, which helped answer @hangar911's question. @Bigchooch28 asked about the functionality of the instrument panel and lights, seeking additional information about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @switchcars, while providing updates on the vehicle's condition, mentioned some issues: the left headlight is non-functional and the right turn signal/flasher does not appear to work. This implies that while many components work, there are some deficiencies that could concern potential buyers. Overall, the combination of these comments shows varied levels of interest and concern regarding the Porsche tractor.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have praised the Lotus Elan for its beauty and originality. @GigPete described it as a 'lovely example,' noting the appealing dashboard. @LoTex remarked on its stunning appearance, comparing it to his experience with Elans, while @Marettm appreciated the classic Lotus Yellow, mentioning the lightweight body and performance of the 1.6-liter engine as iconic features of 1960s British motoring. Several others including @trktoy07 and @richpopek also emphasized the car's quality and driving experience, with @robertwichert even suggesting it should command a high price due to its well-kept history.
Neutral: Several comments acknowledged the mixed characteristics of the vehicle. @sbello and @mdo noted the car's impressive aesthetics while questioning the accuracy of certain features, particularly the dashboard design. Others like @FrankFF47 and @PFV6 provided insights about the car's history and specifications, noting the variations in tail light design and the significance of VIN numbers. @andy_m1 (The Seller) offered detailed responses addressing condition concerns and past inquiries, indicating a clear willingness to communicate and provide information about the vehicle as well as spare parts available with the sale.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some commenters regarding specific issues with the vehicle. @Miamor and @rickst inquired about the alignment of the front bonnet and missing headlight rings, suggesting that these could be costly repairs. @gjz30075 also pointed out the absence of the heater hose which raised questions about the car’s functionality. Additionally, @Colinslovechild mentioned potential problems with the windshield wipers not parking correctly after use, hinting at minor mechanical issues. Despite these concerns, many still expressed admiration for the car, balancing critiques with appreciation.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the beauty and condition of the vehicle, with @Rockabillykid exclaiming, "Splendid!!!!!! GLWTA". @Samara126 called it a "Gorgeous car!" and @flyntofdallas expressed sadness over not being wealthy enough to afford it, labeling it "Stunning". @DeuceRider shared a personal anecdote about his own experience with Rivieras, noting that despite his lack of A/C, he felt "cool" driving his car. The sense of nostalgia was echoed by @CarFoolLane, who shared fond memories of a family member's Riviera, further strengthening the appreciation for the vehicle's legacy. Commenters like @dollycat3 described it as "exceptional Tawny Mist magnificence" and @MaineDoc remarked that early Rivieras offer smooth power unlike any other vehicle, making it appealing beyond just looks.
Neutral: There was a substantial discussion about the A/C system, with @kink56 expressing concern over the common issue of restored cars lacking functional A/C. This was elaborated by @cjp69, who speculated about possible reasons for such situations. @1OldKid (The Seller) clarified the A/C issues in a response stating, "A/C worked well then got a leak." Commenting on fuel efficiency, @kink56 provided detailed insights about mileage expectations for Rivieras, noting that highway conditions greatly influence performance. Other commenters shared their historical experiences with the car and opinions on various models, indicating a blend of personal stories and technical discussions surrounding the Riviera's design and history.
Negative: Some comments reflected frustration regarding the lack of functional A/C in restored vehicles, with @kink56 stating that it is a widespread issue among classic cars. @david_kol queried about the last maintenance of fluids, hinting at possible underlying issues needing attention. @cbinw posed a direct question to the Seller about the A/C functionality, likely indicating concerns from potential buyers about the condition of the vehicle. @neilpierson25 speculated that some sellers might hold back on diagnosing A/C problems to avoid revealing costly repairs, thus shifting the potential risk to buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments on this vehicle reflect a deep appreciation for its history and aesthetics. @tr6_nephew notes the emotional difficulty of parting with an original owner TR6, highlighting the significance of such a classic car. @Jonesy66 describes the car as pretty and envisions an exciting summer adventure driving it home from Twin Falls. Enthusiasts like @maggie70 admire the rare original brushed aluminum trim, indicating the car's collectible nature, while @mikeor emphasizes the amazement at still finding single-owner sports cars from the 70s. The vehicle's known history and potential as a driver or restoration project are also praised. @maggie70 appreciates its story and condition, suggesting it be kept in its current form.
Neutral: Several comments provide practical observations rather than strong opinions. @bgladish raises a question about the type of carburetors, and @RoundHeadlights suggests they appear to be Weber carbs, adding an element of curiosity regarding the vehicle's modifications. @Bkeegan893 (The Seller) confirms the carburetor type and provides background information about the car's ownership and storage situation, explaining why the car is for sale. @TexasMule expresses interest in the story behind the engine replacement that occurred after ten years, illustrating the car's repair history while also seeking more details on its journey.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns or raise questions that may cast a shadow on the vehicle's appeal. @dmeyers60 prefers the stock exhaust note over modifications like those found on Jay Leno's vehicle, suggesting a preference for authenticity. @Flashpix, while agreeing with Jay Leno, recommends removing certain parts like rubber bumper overriders, which may imply dissatisfaction with these design elements. Additionally, @bgladish's question about the carburetors hints at possible confusion or concern over the vehicle's mechanical integrity. @retrozen's comment reflects a sense of trust in the next owner to treat the TR6 lovingly, which could imply concerns about the car's future care.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @JGraham describes the Cota as a beautiful bike that has been set up correctly, reminiscing about the unique sound and smell of a Spanish two-stroke engine. Their appreciation reflects the charm and essence of vintage trials bikes, showcasing the emotional connection enthusiasts often have with these vehicles.
Neutral: @MikefromColorado confirms that the bike is indeed a trials model, emphasizing its suitability for vintage twin-shock trials. He also addresses the concern of @domingo_santo about the swingarm extension, noting that the modification was done by the previous owner and that it provides a bit more control in trials.
Negative: @greg2002 expresses a general curiosity about the bike's classification as a trials bike, contrasting it with his experience of owning a motocross bike. However, there are no overtly negative comments regarding the bike; the concerns raised seem more focused on clarification rather than dissatisfaction.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Skillman25 describes the vehicle as a nice looking truck in classic 70's color, expressing good luck to the seller. Similarly, @wkgabrie1 appreciates the truck's appearance, requesting confirmation on the functioning of the cruise control and AC. @ACA101 finds the truck classy in its Gold Metallic hue and mentions the rarity of this color in certain combinations, while @Gs82 notes its nice features and options.
Neutral: @Ranger429 raises a question towards the seller regarding the truck’s true model, pointing out discrepancies with the advertised Ranger XLT components. @Lambchop provides details about the truck’s molding options and discusses the significance of paint selections, but also mentions the downside of seeing the underside sprayed with undercoat. @heneryj asks about the engine type, reflecting an interest in the truck’s specifications.
Negative: @Lambchop expresses discomfort with the undercoating, wondering if something is being hidden under it and suggests the I-Beams could use new bushings. @Ranger429 critiques the lack of clarity regarding the truck's original identification, stating the need for a Marti report for better insight. @Cougarxr71970 notes that the truck was sold at Mecum Indy for $15K and has lost some of its original features, like the running boards.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters are enthusiastic about the vehicle, describing it as a beautiful early Twin Cam with great history. @Chase68 appreciates the deluxe seats and competition seatbelts, hinting at its racing pedigree. @Slam105 praises the rarity and quality of the car, indicating it should fetch a high price. @tim_t remarks on the car's provenance, suggesting that it has been well cared for and boasts impressive features like wider re-rimmed wheels. @bigboysurf finds the race history particularly appealing, while @gregoryindiana admires the authenticity and significant history of the car, affirming its value and encouraging the future owner to showcase it at events.
Neutral: The seller, @HealeyBrothers, actively engages with potential buyers, providing clarifications regarding the vehicle's specs and history. They confirm that the wheels have a long history dating back to the car's racing days and that the engine is original, rebuilt in 2007/08. As further questions arise, they provide answers about restoration details, such as the non-louvered hood and the inclusion of the correct heater. Various buyers ask about the car’s condition and performance, with some, like @plumberpilot, noting possible issues but receiving reassurances from the seller that the car runs smoothly and without misses.
Negative: Some concerns are raised, such as @Chase68 questioning why the car lacks Weber carburetors, which are generally associated with factory race models. @WCD2020 humorously remarks on the car being a "historical gem" while hinting at its hidden past and its ability to appreciate in value, potentially casting a shadow over the transparency of its history. @billyblyth sarcastically alludes to the overwhelming documentation about its past, which some enthusiasts feel might not be effectively communicated, indicating a desire for more detailed historical context.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed a great appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and overall condition. User @CB65 remarks on the beautiful color combination of the car, specifically highlighting the striking rear quarter view. @Fordfan1956 also shares admiration by calling it a beautiful T-Bird and inquiring about original hubcaps, which the seller confirms they have. @thunderbirdsnw adds to the positivity by noting the car's impressive features like a five-bladed fan for engine cooling and wishes the seller well, indicating that this Thunderbird presents itself remarkably well.
Neutral: Several comments focus on factual inquiries about the vehicle rather than expressing strong opinions. @Dafunky1 inquires about the absence of a soft top, to which the seller responds affirmatively, mentioning the car indeed has no soft top. Similarly, @tdub59 asks about the availability of wheel skirts, and the seller directs them to a specific photo that presumably answers the query. @Tucsondawg1 expresses curiosity regarding whether the car can be driven back to SoCal, showing an interest in the vehicle’s usability, and the seller reassures them that the car was driven up in the past.
Negative: A minor criticism was mentioned by @thunderbirdsnw regarding the absence of the windshield fluid bag, though they downplay this as "not a big deal." Such comments highlight that while there are some imperfections, they are overshadowed by the vehicle's positives. The interest in parts and maintenance, including the original hubcaps, presents an underlying concern that the vehicle might require some attention. Overall, while there are minor issues noted, they do not detract significantly from the general admiration expressed by the commenters.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning 'Mars red' color and appealing design. @gscharnagl describes the color combination as absolutely gorgeous, while @emanrace marvels at the beauty of the Mars red, stating it never disappoints. @hpas concurs, humorously noting their own experience with a similar color that never got them pulled over. Additionally, @cuzam89u refers to the car as absolutely beautiful, further emphasizing its attraction among potential buyers.
Neutral: There are several inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition and history, specifically concerning mechanical aspects and potential service records. @gscharnagl asks the seller about the driver's side headlight, and @EricRow requests information on the tire codes. @GACarnut is interested in whether the vehicle comes with a wind deflector, while @Dervus requests additional videos to examine the car's startup sound and top operation. Some comments also suggest a sense of curiosity about the car's history, with several users asking for more information beyond what's provided by Carfax.
Negative: Despite the overall positive remarks, there are notable criticisms and frustration directed at the seller. @Abolfazl voices feelings of disappointment regarding the seller’s lack of responsiveness to requests for information on tire age and requested videos. They describe the seller as the most unresponsive dealer they've encountered on BaT. There is a clear frustration among some commenters about not receiving timely answers or relevant videos, which appears to detract from their interest in the vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Salafi expressed a love for this generation of Camrys, noting they currently own two vehicles with low miles. @111r shared their appreciation for the bulletproof reliability of Camrys and highlighted the collector edition aspect of this model while @BMWE90Guy labeled it as one of the most collectible variants ever made. @WheelZ63 agreed, stating the car’s value is rooted in its low mileage and condition, asserting it has the potential to outlast its owner with proper care.
Neutral: @Akato (The Seller) welcomed participants to the auction and provided assistance, confirming the vehicle's A541E transmission type when inquired. Concerns regarding maintenance were raised by @neevan and @ejl1, leading @Akato to reassure that the car received regular servicing from the original owner, evidenced by 29 service records on Carfax. @IrishSprings expressed curiosity about the transmission's reliability, while @UscPhd97_ asked about the AC system and tire condition, both of which @Akato confirmed were satisfactory.
Negative: Some comments reflected common concerns with the model, as @111r cautioned about potential sludging issues from infrequent oil changes in earlier V6 engines. @ejl1 pointed out small black specks on the driver seat, suspecting they might be cigarette burns, which @Akato denied by stating the car had no foul smell or burns. @bossross raised a question about possible scratches on the dashboard in photos, to which @Akato responded, clarifying they were just reflections.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle's condition, noting it as a 'near flawless example' and highlighting features like the fully detailed PPF protection that keeps the car's exterior in great shape. The inclusion of Active Driving Assistant, which enhances safety with features such as Blind Spot Detection and Lane Departure Warning, was also positively received. Additionally, it was mentioned that the factory warranty remains intact, providing further assurance about the car's reliability and performance.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on specific features and the vehicle's history. Questions about the tires' condition, whether the car had any imperfections, and the timeline for receiving the title were raised. Commenters also inquired about the car's financing process and the lack of adaptive cruise control, while also looking for confirmation on various specifications such as the type of leather seats and the presence of carbon fiber pieces.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding curb rash on the front wheels that was noted in the listing but not initially mentioned clearly. Moreover, some commenters questioned the overall claim of the car being 'near flawless,' wondering about potential small defects that might not be apparent, including paintwork history and any signs of wear on the interior. This led to discussion about whether the seller had neglected to disclose certain imperfections.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments praised the vehicle, describing it as a fantastic bike and reliable. @2caddiesandaMach1 noted it as a 'chopper' without unnecessary complications, while @onlyhonda4me referred to it as 'Rad Honda'. Additionally, @rofandofy complimented Honda for creating a reliable motorcycle that has a custom appearance. Furthermore, @Blackwidow75 expressed a wish to still be able to ride, endorsing the bike as trouble-free and enjoyable to ride, reflecting a strong positive sentiment towards its performance and quality.
Neutral: Some interactions provided helpful information regarding the motorcycle's condition and maintenance history. @MyFirstTime inquired about the maintenance performed on the bike and its additional features, while @basquesushi, the seller, confirmed that the bike was ridden regularly and not left sitting idle, reinforcing its good condition. The Seller also offered details about shipping logistics, stating options for storage and transport for the winning bidder, which indicates transparency in the sale process.
Negative: On a more negative note, there were comments expressing frustration regarding auction maintenance issues. @Ultimate_Combination mentioned annoyance with the BaT email notifications about auctions, suggesting a desire for improvements in the auction process, particularly regarding non-paying winners. @basquesushi also showed concern for a previous buyer who experienced a medical emergency, reflecting that such events impact the buying experience in unforeseen ways. Overall, the comments hinted at some operational challenges within the auction sphere that could dampen participant satisfaction.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express excitement about the vehicle, particularly highlighting its visual appeal and performance. @Ange describes the Black Rose color as 'sinister and sexy,' while @NuccioAutomotive praises Superformance for producing the best recreation Cobras with excellent build quality. @Wob notes that the car is not only memorable due to its gorgeous color but also features a powerful motor that provides an exhilarating experience, likening its sound to a 'BEAST'. @TheOMDude emphasizes the transparency and responsiveness of @Wob, suggesting buyers can trust the quality and details provided.
Neutral: Several users commented on the vehicle's specifications and requested additional information. @DJW131 inquired about the seating options, while @StrayConvert expressed a desire for more detailed engine information, questioning whether the engine is an actual 427 that was stroked. @gmonsen speculated on the engine configuration, stating it might be a Ford small block stroked to 427, which is common for Cobra replicas. @Jhv48 asked about the vehicle's mileage history, noting that it was sold in 2022 with 5,000 miles, maintaining its current mileage.
Negative: A few users raised concerns regarding the lack of specific information provided about the engine and other details of the vehicle. @StrayConvert expressed discomfort with the ambiguous phrasing around the engine's specifications, highlighting a need for clarity. There was a suggestion from @gmonsen regarding the potential use of a common engine configuration found in replicas, indicating skepticism towards the vehicle's advertised specifications. Additionally, users like @DJW131 showed concern about the availability of options that are not explicitly stated, which could affect potential buyers' decisions.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @thanimal calling it "Sexy!" and @jefreeto referring to it as "A thing of beauty." Others, like @Drivewaymonuments, mentioned that while it may not be a 550, it certainly would make James Dean proud. The seller, @Matstermag48, received compliments on the quality of the build from @shelleysolaris and @Deserteagle1971, with the latter praising the color combination. @heychris2002 remarked on the attention to detail, suggesting that the car exceeds expectations. Overall, the vehicle is highly regarded for its aesthetics and craftsmanship.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about specific features and details of the car. @MichaelRyerson asked about the emergency brake location, and @Purosangue requested photos of the adjustable front axle beam and suspension components, which the seller promised to provide. Comments related to functionality, such as @indi's question about clearance issues with the turbo and @JPDMI's request for information on the engine cooling system, were also common. The seller, @Matstermag48, answered these inquiries thoroughly, demonstrating transparency about the vehicle's design and performance.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns or expressed skepticism about the vehicle. @BobSoCal questioned the limited mileage since the build, asking for insights on why it only had 270 miles after its construction. @indi expressed concern over potential road debris issues with the turbo, and @FormerDatsun510Man noted the front and rear track differences, questioning the vehicle's engineering based on the pictures. There was also a comment flagged as non-constructive by another user, indicating that not all feedback was positive. Overall, while the vehicle is well-received, some aspects of its functionality and history left room for discussion.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the Bronco as a "bloody beauty" and appreciates the tremendous build, expressing excitement for the vehicle by wishing good luck to future owners. @DianaM (The Seller) provides additional images that showcase the Bronco's soft top, height in relation to a garage, and engages positively with potential buyers by thanking them for their interest.
Neutral: @mtenvoorde inquires about pictures of the soft top, indicating interest in that specific feature. @Vandalmike33 poses a question regarding the presence of vintage AC, which suggests curiosity about the vehicle's features. @DianaM (The Seller) responds to these inquiries, providing the requested information and clarifying that the Bronco does not have vintage AC.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the Bronco, as the discussions revolve around inquiries and positive feedback without any criticism or complaints expressed.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments showcase appreciation for the overall aesthetic and design of the 1967 Pontiac Firebird 400 Convertible. @Craven described it as a "very nice looking Pony/Muscle Car," while @Panoply called it a "beautiful Bird" and noted the car's color and chrome wheel balance. @boaboyoz deemed it a "fabulous Firebird, resplendent in Cyber Gray over red," highlighting its stylishness and the reputation of the seller, @1600veloce. Many commenters echoed similar sentiments about the vehicle's visual appeal, emphasizing that it appears to have received significant care and maintenance over time.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on the vehicle's features and specifications. @AMD questioned the reason for manual shifting in the video demonstration, leading to a direct response from @1600veloce explaining that they aimed to showcase all functions, including manual shifting. Commenters like @Titanguy and @Doug78 raised concerns about the convertible top not lowering fully, prompting @1600veloce to acknowledge the issue and clarify that the side panels would need adjustments for the top to fit properly. Other inquiries centered around specifics of the car's components and performance, indicating a desire for further understanding before potential bidding.
Negative: On the negative side, several commenters pointed out potential problems with the convertible top and discrepancies in vehicle identification. @forrest3 and @Doug78 highlighted concerns regarding the top's functionality, stating it did not lower all the way, which might suggest underlying mechanical issues. @Leojmcca raised doubts regarding the authenticity of the vehicle's motors, questioning the documentation and its relationship to the VIN information. Such concerns could deter potential buyers who are looking for assurance regarding the car's value and condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @JRI4Car commented on the vehicle's color, expressing excitement about it being a great choice. @Amitypd mentioned including a new drive shaft boot with the auction and confirmed that the factory tool kit is also included, enhancing the overall appeal of the sale. The bike has been described as a nice touring bike by @Amitypd, who noted that it functions correctly after riding it around town and on the interstate for about 100 miles.
Neutral: @kbutton85716 shared enthusiasm about the bike, albeit with a question regarding a detail on the gas tank that resembles carbon fiber. @Amitypd clarified that it is simply a sticker meant to protect the paint from abrasions caused by pants. Additionally, @ericchapeau raised a query about the history of the bike, asking why it was being sold after purchasing it in 2025, to which @Amitypd responded with details about his trade-in and limited experience with riding the bike.
Negative: @ericchapeau's comment questioned the reasoning behind reselling the vehicle shortly after acquiring it, indicating potential concerns about its history or the seller's intentions. @willy inquired about the date codes on each tire, which could suggest apprehension regarding the bike's maintenance and safety, as understanding the tire's age is important in evaluating the vehicle's condition and reliability.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Craven expressed a preference for this vehicle over contemporary VW buses, indicating a strong appreciation for its classic design. @GLWTA called it an "awesome van," highlighting the general enthusiasm around this model. Furthermore, @peterinPDX reminisced fondly about owning a 65 window van, noting the fun experiences he had with friends, which adds to the positive nostalgia surrounding this vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments centered on the vehicle's specifications and history, with @Embee64 (The Seller) clarifying that he does not have the matching front black plate. He also mentioned that the trim tag indicates a 4-speed configuration but clarified it is actually a 3-speed on the column. @Dexandsqueak highlighted the headliner quality but did so with an emoji, maintaining a light-hearted tone. @earsmccoy sought specific details about the vehicle's condition and its driving performance, indicating interest without forming a strong opinion either way.
Negative: There were a few concerns raised, particularly regarding the headliner, which @heneryj referred to as potentially "shaggy" indicating it might not be in the best condition. Additionally, @earsmccoy inquired about corrosion on the side doors and asked for driving videos, which reflects skepticism about the condition of the vehicle. @delmarfinancial also shared a nostalgic but somewhat troubling memory about their past experiences with manual linkages locking up, suggesting that this could be a potential issue for the current vehicle as well.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Walter1122 praised the vehicle's restoration, giving it an A++. @WAGONBOYTD commented on the simplicity and cleanliness of the build, noting it was a nice execution. @volleymdut highlighted the fantastic attention to detail, calling it a wonderful build with a solid exterior and interior color scheme.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific features of the vehicle, such as @alinares1 asking if the top could be removed and @Irecycle checking the height to ensure it fits in a garage. @jgranberry and @tspadilla1 were looking for driving and start-up videos to better assess the vehicle's performance. @VantageAuto responded to these requests with timely updates, affirming the vehicle's readiness for enjoyment by a new owner.
Negative: @rbuonanno expressed concern about the paint's appearance, questioning if it was fading, although @VantageAuto clarified that the paint was new and the issue was just lighting reflections. Overall, there were no significant negative remarks, but concerns about paint visibility were addressed by the seller to reassure potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @VDrifter1500 describes the vehicle as a fun little sports car with a great motor, expressing love for the car and the attention it garners. @billbrosseau (The Seller) highlights the vehicle's pristine condition and the numerous compliments received when taking it out, emphasizing that it is a true show stopper. Additionally, @billbrosseau appreciates @VG1's comments on the steering wheel leather bubbling issue, acknowledging it as something they had not noticed before and expressing gratitude for the repair instructions.
Neutral: The vehicle's mechanical condition appears to be solid, according to @billbrosseau, who mentions no issues with the transmission or clutch, and states that the convertible top has been fixed following some intermittent problems that were due to two switches in the doors. @ProfJwh raises important questions about the clutch's condition and the retractable roof's band replacements, and @cardino also inquires about any mechanical problems, indicating interest in the car's performance. @billbrosseau assures potential buyers that the car is a joy to drive and promises to upload videos showcasing the vehicle's operation.
Negative: @aloealoe raises a concern regarding the vehicle's license plate, questioning why it features a plate assigned to a Hyundai. This comment hints at a potential misrepresentation or confusion about the vehicle's history. Furthermore, while the bubbling issue on the steering wheel leather is mentioned by @VG1, indicating it as an easy fix, it still points to a flaw in the car's aesthetic that some buyers may find off-putting. Ultimately, @billbrosseau admits that the bubbling was overlooked and could have been addressed prior to placing the car on auction, suggesting a level of neglect in preparation.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Sssuva99 comments that the vehicle is a great runner, featuring a strong engine and significant maintenance that has been done, allowing it to run smoothly without worries for a long time. The seller has experience using it as a daily driver, which speaks to its reliability. Additionally, @Sssuva99 shares the history of the car, noting its original ownership by a Manhattan doctor and its various locations, which adds to its character and story. The enthusiasm conveyed suggests the seller wants to find a caring new owner for this Mercedes-Benz.
Neutral: @Sssuva99 acknowledges @silforty's inquiry about rust and commits to providing pictures of the rocker panels to demonstrate the vehicle's condition. There's clarity on the vehicle's care, stating that rust is primarily present in one area near the rear wheels, with no significant issues reported elsewhere. @JFSHORN requests information on the car's reliability for a long drive, to which @Sssuva99 responds with no concerns, further indicating the car's capability to handle longer journeys.
Negative: Questions regarding the vehicle's maintenance are raised by @MB-BKRPT, asking whether the head gasket has ever been replaced, which introduces a concern about potential underlying mechanical issues. @tinyhousevroom also requests further pictures of the underside to better assess the vehicle's condition, reflecting uncertainty about areas that may require attention. The need for additional visuals to satisfy inquiries about the engine and transmission underscores the cautious approach potential buyers must take.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have praised the modified 1954 Austin-Healey for its impressive craftsmanship and aesthetic appeal. @Rockabillykid expressed enthusiasm with 'Love this!', while @CarDogThreePedals highlighted its 'ultra-tidy build' and perfectly executed modifications. @Chefgordiemac described it as 'so well done and engineered,' and @Guido36 called it 'an unapologetically badass charismatic Healey,' resonating with the nostalgic charm of a 60s street racer within the modern build. Overall, there is a strong sense of admiration for the vehicle's unique design and execution among the commentators.
Neutral: The seller, @OneoffWillie, provided detailed insights about the vehicle, describing it as a passion project that evolved from a basic kit to a high-quality roadster. He addressed specific inquiries regarding the car's features, such as the fixed driver’s seat, adjustments for future installations, and the limited-slip differential. Additionally, his responses to concerns about the oil leak and registration issues reflect an openness to communication and willingness to assist potential buyers in understanding the car's condition and requirements.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's functionality and reliability. @werthie asked about the severity of the oil leak, while @octane114 questioned whether the leak could affect the pinion parking brake. Additionally, @HillbillyHeathen noted that the driver’s seat appears elevated, leading to practical concerns about the fit and comfort. @mgb44 speculated about potential issues related to the drivetrain and expressed a desire for more modern engine options. These critiques suggest that while the car is visually captivating, there are some reservations regarding its mechanical performance and usability.
|
Lingenfelter 383-Powered 1998 Chevrolet Corvette Convertible 6-Speed
1G1YY32G2W5106140
Lot 199589
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dialup88 (The Seller) describes the 1998 Chevrolet Corvette Convertible as a fun vehicle that offers an exciting driving experience. The Lingenfelter 383 stroker V8 engine delivers impressive performance with 428 horsepower, providing a perfect balance of usability and power. The seller has invested in enhancing the car's performance while ensuring it meets California smog regulations, demonstrating a commitment to keeping the vehicle drivable and in good condition for future owners. The seller has been clear about the car's condition and has provided images of any imperfections, aiming for transparency during the auction process.
Neutral: Throughout the comments, potential bidders ask questions about the car's specifications, maintenance, and features. @bmstaudy inquired about horsepower, while @schnelly2 sought documentation from Lingenfelter, indicating interest in the car's performance pedigree. Others, like @josCherry and @ejsd1989, were concerned with practical aspects like HVAC functionality and safety features like the roll cage, pointing to the buyer's focus on the car's operational readiness and track capability rather than just aesthetics. The seller has responded attentively to these inquiries, showing willingness to assist interested buyers.
Negative: Some comments highlight potential issues and concerns with the Corvette. @clints71 pointed out mileage inconsistencies in the Carfax report, prompting @Dialup88 (The Seller) to explain that this was likely a clerical error. Additionally, concerns about the air conditioning system not blowing cold air and the absence of aftermarket exhaust systems were raised. Although the seller maintains the car's stock components for legal compliance, there are indications that certain issues, such as the HVAC malfunction, could detract from the driving experience, particularly for those looking for a fully operational vehicle. Overall, while issues are noted, the seller remains proactive in addressing and clarifying these points.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle for its impressive condition, describing it as a clean, one-owner 4th generation Camaro with exceptional care taken over its lifetime. The seller, @CobraDeals, highlighted that the car drives excellently, with no visible dings or dents, and noted its near-perfect interior and exterior. Many expressed confidence in the vehicle's reliability, with one commentator mentioning that it's perfect for collection and investment purposes, noting that fine examples of such cars tend to appreciate over time.
Neutral: The discussion contained several inquiries about the car's specifications, repairs, and components. Commenters like @Coog54 and @DenversAgent asked about the tires, exhaust, and potential modifications, while @km1475 inquired if there were any residual odors from tobacco or smoke, which @CobraDeals reassured were absent. The seller confirmed various aspects of the car's history and condition, including that it primarily features original components, and provided details about the tires and the possibility of factory options.
Negative: While there were few outright negative comments, some debate existed regarding the authenticity of certain components, such as the exhaust and the possibility of modifications concerning the wheels and tires. @swaugie expressed uncertainty about whether it had the factory SLP exhaust, asking for specific documentation that could confirm its options. Additionally, there was a query from @MandT about potential logistics when purchasing and transporting the car, though @CobraDeals addressed this by offering assistance and reaffirming vehicle readiness for long-distance travel.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the Jeep, with multiple users expressing their appreciation for its attractive appearance and condition. @kgustavel, the seller, showcases his dedication to maintaining the vehicle, sharing details about its meticulous care and service history since 2007. It has only seen fair-weather use, always garaged, which adds to its charm. The Jeep is noted for drawing positive attention, with comments about receiving thumbs-up and waves from fellow Jeep enthusiasts. The seller’s readiness to provide ample information, photos, and videos of the vehicle further demonstrates transparency and customer service.
Neutral: There are some inquiries regarding the specific features and components of the Jeep, such as the axle ratio and whether it has a hard top. @kgustavel responds promptly to questions, confirming that the Jeep has a 3:54:1 axle/gear ratio and only comes with a soft top, having owned it since the hard top was swapped out. He also provides clarification about the metal doors included with the Jeep and how easy it is to remove the soft top. The seller is also proactive in addressing concerns related to the vehicle's emissions tests, assuring potential buyers of the Jeep's compliance based on previous testing results in Idaho.
Negative: A few concerns were raised regarding the potential for mechanical issues, particularly a query from @Enzo.Ferrari about possible synchro grinding during shifting. @kgustavel addresses these concerns by reviewing footage and stating he has not noticed any issues. Although the seller has taken efforts to reassure potential buyers, the mention of emissions testing and the historical challenges the vehicle faced in this regard might make some cautious, especially for buyers in California where regulations can be stringent.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its classic style and the care it has received over the years. @RuyMachado described it as a 'nice looking and well loved' car, while @Astonjag appreciated the old photographs of the Bugeye, suggesting it might evoke fond memories. Additionally, @robertwichert mentioned the car's evident care, indicating that despite uncertainties about the engine's past, the overall presentation of the vehicle is appealing. @lunatic_fringe2 chimed in with positive remarks about modifications like disc brakes, emphasizing that there is much to like about the Bugeye.
Neutral: The seller, @dscibilia, provided insights into the vehicle's history and maintenance, sharing that the car has been garaged for most of its existence and has not been driven in snow. They noted some challenges in sharing direct photos under the car due to a lack of proper equipment and difficulty driving it personally. The seller's comments referenced some of the vehicle's features and past modifications, such as the installation of a cassette player and the work done on the engine in various years, presenting a balanced overview of the Bugeye's background and performance without making definitive statements about its perfect condition.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, some concerns were mentioned regarding the vehicle's engine and overall functionality. @robertwichert pointed out that although the car has receipts for past work, there is uncertainty about whether the engine has been rebuilt, which could affect its longevity. Additionally, @Klm50 raised questions about the transmission type and requested more details about the functionality of lights and gauges. @lunatic_fringe2 noted discrepancies about the engine size and expressed concern over the radio's condition, indicating that while the Bugeye is a charming vehicle, there are elements that warrant closer scrutiny.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the overall condition of the 2018 Corvette Z06, highlighting it as one of the cleanest they had seen. @cowboy33 described having driven the car for hours in various conditions, noting that the engine and transmission were responsive and everything worked perfectly. Additionally, @Trainsplanesandautos (The Seller) emphasized the car's pristine state, mentioning that ice, heat, and rain had not affected the vehicle, which had PPF installed throughout, and that it had not been tracked by either owner.
Neutral: Commenters discussed the vehicle's updates, particularly its cooling system improvements over earlier models. @General_TSO reassured @komodor19 that the 2017 and newer models had addressed previous heat soak issues, while @Trainsplanesandautos (The Seller) confirmed that this 2018 model had received all necessary updates. They also shared details about the modifications under the hood, with @Trainsplanesandautos stating that while there were non-stock parts, the car was serviced by Chevrolet and had no known computer updates.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding potential overheating issues with forced induction cars during track use. @komodor19 pointed out that while newer models had improvements, overheating remained a problem for cars without upgraded cooling systems like radiators and oil coolers. Furthermore, questions regarding the state of the car's paint, battery condition, and the functionality of modified parts were also noted. @F92S63M8 expressed concerns about the potential for blemishes and the battery's status, while @Trainsplanesandautos addressed these questions but revealed some minor issues with the paint protection film.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's overall condition and aesthetics. @ArcticJon called it an 'absolutely gorgeous car', while @GDMCHRIZ noted it as a 'future classic' emphasizing both its driving pleasure and reliability. @WEM praised the photos and referred to the BMW as 'gorgeous', indicating a shared appreciation among viewers for its styling and care. Commenters are optimistic about the car's low mileage and maintenance, suggesting confidence in its longevity and performance due to the seller's detailed upkeep.
Neutral: The seller, @Mfonk, provided extensive information regarding the car's maintenance history and condition in response to prospective buyers' questions. He confirmed changes such as oil and brake fluid services, as well as the addition of a K&N air filter, while expressing that certain major services were not necessary given the car's low mileage. He also committed to providing additional requested videos and pictures, ensuring transparency regarding the vehicle's condition and operation, which was well-received by interested parties.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the age of the car, and specific components that potentially needed attention were discussed. @Fortunateson and @dstuemky asked detailed questions regarding major services, such as replacing the water pump and checking for oil seepage. Additionally, @73carnut inquired about previous repairs made to the rear wheel and window, hinting at issues that could affect buyer confidence. The comments indicated a thorough due diligence from potential buyers, underscoring typical apprehensions regarding older vehicles despite the seller's assurance of its excellent condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @detroitdatsun praised the vehicle, stating, "This has to be the cleanest 180K mile BMW M3/4/5 in existence. Looks like it has 80K miles rather than 180K." @RabGalactic commented positively about the car's striking appearance, mentioning it is "very red, very cool," and wishing good luck with the auction. @458s also expressed admiration by noting it is a beautiful specification, highlighting the rarity and aesthetic appeal of the manual sedan. They acknowledged that BMW produced great-looking cars in the 80s and 90s, contributing to the positive view of the vehicle's design.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding the condition of the vehicle, particularly concerning rust. @Robotomatic asked if there were any signs of rust, while @remac1 raised questions about the interior and maintenance records as well as concerns about parts needing replacement due to the mileage. @LBL1954 echoed the sentiment, asking pointed questions regarding rust visibility and maintenance. Some updates from @southtampaautoboutique (The Seller) indicated that there was no rust, although they acknowledged the need for clarity about the car's condition. The seller mentioned uploading recent service records and promised to provide additional photos.
Negative: Some comments highlighted concerns regarding rust, with @red_ben explicitly saying, "No rust anywhere? You’re kidding right?" They referenced visible rust holes and flaking in specific photos, questioning the seller's assurance. @CaddyNelson noted that additional photos of rust-prone areas would be beneficial for potential buyers. @Kourt88 inquired about updates concerning photos and clarification on rust comments, indicating some uncertainty around the seller's claims. The tone from these commenters suggested skepticism about the vehicle's condition as presented.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @n0ggin (The Seller) expresses genuine affection for the car, noting its excellent starting capability, fantastic driving performance, and appealing appearance. @EvadL points out the impressive specs of the vehicle and praises the potential of the GT4 for track use, regarding aspects like steel rotors and bucket seats. @PlayHARD and @PaulEZ both echo similar sentiments about the car's appeal, highlighting the PDK as a feature they enjoy and recommending the vehicle to potential buyers.
Neutral: Comments reveal a blend of perspectives on various features of the vehicle, with @dyp911e and @Mid-EngineEnthusiast acknowledging the controversy over PDK versus manual transmission choices. @zheng provides insights into the car's history, noting signs of it being a previous track car, which could add value to some buyers. @cfield raises questions about some specific features, like the holes in the frunk and warranty status, which reflects a desire for more information rather than outright praise or criticism.
Negative: Some commenters express dissatisfaction with the presentation of the vehicle, such as @EvadL, who critiques the lack of preparation in the auction listings, pointing out the need for better attention to detail in both photos and information, which could affect sale price. @rp2000r asks about the original MSRP, implying there may be concerns about value. Additionally, @zheng suggests potential issues with previous modifications, which could complicate perceptions of the vehicle's integrity.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect admiration for the vehicle, particularly regarding its aesthetic appeal and luxury features. @TulsaConnoisseur highlights how this Bentley stands out from their collection, emphasizing that it merges extreme luxury with sporty driving dynamics. The vehicle has also garnered numerous compliments, which speaks to its attractive design and presence on the road. Additionally, @TulsaConnoisseur mentions the exceptional sound system, crafted by a renowned installer, which elevates the driving experience, especially for audiophiles. Enthusiastic remarks like 'Beautiful! GLWA' from @Scubaaah and @Bigleo's comment on its beauty further illustrate a positive community response to the vehicle.
Neutral: There are practical inquiries and discussions regarding the vehicle's specifications, such as the presence of adaptive cruise control and details about the stereo system. @srallen brings up the aftermarket audio, indicating a potential concern about modifications, while @TulsaConnoisseur assures that the sound system can be easily removed if necessary, stating that the installation was done by a top-tier installer. These responses show a balanced view where potential bidders are encouraged to seek clarification on important features, reflecting a mature and informative discussion. Additionally, the mention of a title concern by @AACGUY suggests that the buyers are also considering the car’s legal status, although this was not elaborated upon.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's features are raised, specifically about the absence of adaptive cruise control, indicated by @srallen’s comment. While @TulsaConnoisseur defends the vehicle's lack of this feature by sharing personal experiences with other high-end cars, this point may leave some potential buyers feeling uneasy about the decision without all desired amenities. Furthermore, @AACGUY's question about the Cherokee Nation title introduces uncertainty about the car's legal status, which could be off-putting for prospective bidders. These comments suggest that, while the vehicle is highly regarded, there are aspects that potential buyers should investigate further before making an offer.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the vehicle's beauty and performance. @DieselM333 congratulates @ojai_trek on giving the car a great life and celebrates the longevity of the 993 model. @ThrasherBear commends the appearance of the car, noting that the white color enhances its lines. @thejudgeRoy and others echo this sentiment, emphasizing that white is the best color for a 993, while @ojai_trek shares that he receives frequent compliments while driving it. @LPKeigwin also admires the car, likening it to his own and appreciating the distinct interior features.
Neutral: Several comments focus on specific features and modifications of the car, raising questions and observations about its original configuration. @BrentO points out discrepancies with the rear seat configuration and the presence of incorrect accents, while @BillG993 offers insights about possible ordering options for the vehicle. @Rennline inquires about the paint work and gauges, suggesting that there have been author alterations. @ojai_trek clarifies various aspects, such as confirming the presence of non-supple rear seats and explaining the custom work done on the car, which includes the addition of a splitter and modified rims.
Negative: Some comments highlight concerns related to the vehicle's authenticity and condition. @Rennline questions whether any prior paint work was done on the car, and @geh mentions potential issues with the car's paint technology and modifications that may not align with OEM standards. @JorJor expresses skepticism about the condition of the clear bra, suggesting discoloration, and raises queries about access to paint readings and compression tests. Overall, there is a sentiment of uncertainty from some commenters regarding the original state of the vehicle and the modifications that may have been made over time.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments highlight the stunning appearance of the Porsche 996 with its Ocean Blue Metallic paint. @RumbleAuto praises this color, noting its beauty in bright sunlight, while @BFR2 also expresses love for the color and jokingly comments on its rarity. @Goodwood2020 describes the color combination as timeless and elegant, further corroborating the vehicle's appealing aesthetics. Additionally, @FRUNKenstein reminisces about his own positive experience with a similar model, emphasizing the desirability of the ‘99 model year and its unique characteristics. The seller, @SevenHorses, also contributes positively by sharing personal experiences with the car, showcasing the joy of driving and the high regard he has for this specific model.
Neutral: The seller, @SevenHorses, provides valuable insights about the vehicle's condition and history without showing any strong biases. He mentions that the IMS bearing has not been replaced, keeping potential buyers informed about a known concern among these models. Questions about the tires were addressed with clarity, indicating their manufacturing dates, and highlighting that new tires will likely be needed. @kylebrightman raises a concern about the tires' date codes, while @Lesr3204 advises that replacing the tires will be essential for safety. Furthermore, @BFR2 engages with the seller about the car's exhaust and performance aspects in an inquisitive manner, indicating a healthy exchange of information without immediate concern or bias towards negativity or positivity.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism and caution regarding the vehicle's potential mechanical issues. @hrgottlieb inquires about whether the problematic IMS bearings have been replaced, hinting at a common worry for potential buyers. Similarly, @cardino shares a negative personal experience with IMS bearing failure in a previous car, further emphasizing a concern about reliability in these models. There are also remarks about potential issues in handling, such as @Markosgen asking about squeaks or rattles, to which the seller responds that there are no significant noises beyond normal expectations for a Porsche. Additionally, there are light-hearted but critical comments about the tires needing replacement from both @Lesr3204 and @BFR2, with @BFR2 sarcastically noting that 'round tires are the best kind,' indicating that there are concerns regarding the vehicle's current readiness for driving.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CMD1 (The Seller) expresses confidence in the Cayenne Diesel, having personally driven it for over 300 miles and stating that it drives excellently. The vehicle features both ice cold air conditioning and a hot heater, promising comfort in various climates. Additionally, the seller mentions that videos showcasing the vehicle will be available soon, generating excitement among potential buyers. @lovetheclutch shares enthusiasm for the vehicle, envisioning it as a stylish choice for towing their future GT4, highlighting its appeal in a practical sense.
Neutral: The seller, @CMD1, discusses the logistics of the auction, including tax collection specifics for Illinois and shipping arrangements at competitive rates. There are necessary fees outlined for both out-of-state buyers and Illinois residents for license plates and taxes. Also, @CMD1 provides information on the Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) replacement that was performed as part of a recall, addressing the concerns of buyers regarding recent updates and compliance. @NJCochran and @RGLASSMAN ask questions about the DPF service and emissions compliance, indicating interest in the vehicle's maintenance history and regulatory standing.
Negative: Some buyers express concerns about the vehicle's emissions and maintenance requirements. @NJcochran specifically inquires about DPF service or replacement, while @RGLASSMAN requests more information on the emissions fix and how it impacts performance and compliance. This suggests that potential buyers are wary about the implications of past issues related to emissions fixes and are seeking reassurance about the vehicle's reliability and overall performance post-recall.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BobFred (The Seller) expresses a deep-rooted enthusiasm for BMW vehicles, citing his extensive history with E36 and E46 convertibles. He emphasizes that this particular model is the best he has owned, highlighting its impeccable condition by mentioning its consistent maintenance and storage in a garage. The seller reassures potential buyers about the performance and beauty of the car, stating it runs excellently and turns heads wherever it goes. He also emphasizes transparency regarding the car's history and has taken steps to ensure it is thoroughly inspected before listing.
Neutral: @BobFred provides details about recent maintenance, including a new tire installation and timely oil changes. He addresses concerns raised by potential buyers, such as the need for a VANOS system update and mentions various minor mechanical issues discovered during the pre-purchase inspection. The seller clarifies that while the car has some oil leaks, there's no evidence of drips in the garage, signifying that it has been well cared for. He shares insights from the inspection report, showcasing his commitment to transparency in the sale process.
Negative: Despite @BobFred's pride in the vehicle, he acknowledges that it has some minor flaws due to its 80k miles. The inspection revealed that the engine mounts are worn, a valve adjustment is needed, and there are leaking shocks, alongside several noted oil leaks that he wasn't previously aware of. Although he reassures potential buyers about the overall performance, he admits that these mechanical issues, while manageable, may concern buyers looking for a perfect vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @kevinwaspi described the car as gorgeous and wished everyone good luck with the transaction. @hupper called it a beauty and echoed the sentiment of good luck to the seller. @Nimbostratus expressed enjoyment in the car's aesthetics, hoping the next owner enjoys it for years to come, while @F1Rocket appreciated the correct hood on the vehicle, comparing it to his prior experience with a '67 model. The Seller, @Camarokid, mentioned the vehicle's purchase from a reputable dealer and emphasized the high quality of the car.
Neutral: Several comments focused on specific elements of the vehicle's trim tag and features. @Shootnride requested an assessment of the trim tag, leading to a discussion about its authenticity and production details. @rsinor highlighted that the trim tag is likely a reproduction from around 2000, while further comments by @Factoid pointed out that multiple components including the trim tag and engine stamp appear incorrect for an L72 model. @Nimbostratus mentioned that the dual-circuit master cylinder was a smart move by GM in 1967, suggesting it could be a positive feature for potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the authenticity and condition of several aspects of the car. @hupper mentioned the absence of a hardtop as a significant red flag and expressed skepticism about the reputation of the seller. @Factoid listed multiple discrepancies, stating that the trim tag and engine stamp are not original, and emphasized that buyers should conduct thorough research regarding these anomalies. @NCRSmaniac echoed these concerns, suggesting the car still holds aesthetic appeal but highlighting the need for buyers to be aware of its issues. Overall, there was a cautionary tone towards the car's potential value and authenticity.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @vontrips describes the car as a clean, unmolested S2000, highlighting optional features such as the front splitter, side strakes, and rear spoiler that enhance its appeal. @drbobs82 refers to it as a gem, suggesting strong desirability. @TheDudeAbides2 expresses that this vehicle could be a steal, indicating potential value for buyers. @jtom provides insight that the car was purchased as an early retirement gift and has been well-kept, adding to its charm by emphasizing that it has not been driven aggressively, enhancing its reputation as a quality vehicle.
Neutral: Comments from @fires4 request specific information about the vehicle's service history, tires' age, and whether the car has ever been smoked in, showing a diligent potential buyer's interest in understanding the vehicle's condition. @dtepierre seeks clarification on the tires' D.O.T. date and condition, reflecting a keen eye for detail. @Dozer2025 (The Seller) confirms the car has never been smoked in and comes with a cover for the convertible top, providing reassurances regarding its condition, while @jtom offers procedural details about lien releases and title clean status.
Negative: Concerns are raised by @KarmannG2109 regarding the clutch replacement despite low mileage, hinting at hidden issues. @Parts619 questions potential damage to the brake fluid area, which raises red flags about maintenance. Additionally, @stevefi12345 criticizes misinformation regarding tire dots, suggesting a lack of expertise among respondents. @fires4, while expressing a desire for more clarity in the car's financial and service records, infers doubts about transparency and the care the vehicle may have received, which casts shadows on the seller's credibility.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @oldbiker80 describes the bike as an impeccable example of an R69S, expressing enthusiasm for the bidding process. @RPMcIsaac calls it a beautiful example and shares that they have had the fortune to see it in person, signaling high regard for the vehicle. Additionally, @DNK mentions their own recent acquisition of a similar bike restored to nearly concours level, suggesting a respected market presence and appreciation for the type.
Neutral: Several commenters express curiosity regarding specifics of the bike’s features and history. @E911 asks about the unique tank lid design and whether a startup video will be available, which indicates a desire for more information before making decisions. Comments from @StaffordRestorations clarify that certain features like turn signals were not standard until later models, which is important for understanding the bike's historical context and specifications.
Negative: @saddlesore raises concerns about the restoration cost and the figures mentioned in the advertisement, indicating that not everything seems accurate in relation to current market values and possible discrepancies in the restoration's legitimacy. @Watermark100 questions the absence of factory-installed features like turn signals, hinting at uncertainties regarding the restoration's completeness. Overall, there are doubts expressed about the advertised restoration costs and how they stack against current values, particularly from market perspectives shared by @DNK and @saddlesore.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have praised the Jaguar E-Type, specifically its stunning Opalescent Silver Blue color and beautiful aesthetics. @Dollycat3 noted the vehicle's great documentation and remarkable interior, while @baysailor49 expressed admiration for the classic look given by the narrow white walls. Enthusiasts like @Lynn and @RiffRaff commented on how exquisite and appealing this particular model is, suggesting that professional restorations by Images Auto Body indicate a high-quality finish. Others, such as @ezxh2, further highlighted the vehicle's color, calling it perfect. Overall, the consensus is that this E-Type is a magnificent example of automotive design, attracting positive attention among collectors and enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments also focused on distinguishing features of this Jaguar E-Type model, with discussions highlighting the differences between Series 1, 1.5, and 2 classifications. @LLynn and @mikethemasher explained these distinctions, detailing changes made through various iterations, especially emphasizing the transition during the late 1960s. @Bordeaux attempted to clarify common areas of confusion around these series, although some commenters like @davidxk pointed out errors in those distinctions. Discussions around mechanical aspects, like the engine and carburetors, showed a shared understanding of the vehicle’s alterations throughout its production reign, but left room for varying opinions on how these modifications affect its classification and appeal.
Negative: On the downside, a few commenters raised concerns about inconsistencies in the vehicle listing and restoration details. @miltonrobson questioned the presence of varying seat types in the photographs, prompting @MikeAndres (The Seller) to acknowledge a mistake and clarify that original seats were restored. Additionally, there were discussions about the tachometer's redline limit, with @Realbeard and others pointing out potential confusion regarding its accuracy. @jags4ever302 raised questions about the convertible top material, leading to a revelation from @MikeAndres that the specified color and type may not be original. These critiques highlight a few discrepancies that could affect potential buyers' perceptions of the vehicle's authenticity and restoration integrity.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Calamari_Jujutsu noted that it is a nice Jeep and wished the seller good luck with the auction. @mspaulding88 commented positively on the Jeep's condition, stating that it appears close to rust-free given its treatment over light surface rust, also expressing admiration by calling it a great looking Jeep. The comments reflect a general appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and condition, indicating that others find it appealing as well.
Neutral: @lucky12345678910 raised a question regarding the seller's credibility, inquiring about the new seller and their difference from an alumni buyer. @newcarpro provided information related to the vehicle's specifications including its VIN and details such as '2006 JEEP WRANGLER SPORT 4X4'. The comments reflect a mix of inquiry and factual contributions about the vehicle without strong emotional weight either way.
Negative: @yben pointed out a discrepancy in the listing regarding the axle type, suggesting it should mention a Dana 44 front axle instead of a Dana 30. @LKODEN questioned the application of POR 15 paint, specifically if it was applied over rusty components. @Stockshill expressed concerns about potential rust, asking if the undercoating may be hiding underlying issues and requested additional pictures of the undercarriage. These comments highlight concerns about the vehicle's condition, particularly around rust and discrepancies in its specifications.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @greenerdays11 (The Seller) received compliments on the vehicle's condition and color combination, particularly praising the Palladium Silver finish that suits the S-class body style well. Comments from @cottrd and @bpeachee highlighted the car's lower mileage and the inclusion of the AMG package, confirming that the car appears to be in excellent aesthetic condition. The seller also emphasized the quality of the paint, stating it has zero blemishes, which was reiterated by @Mach.86 who found the car visually appealing.
Neutral: Several comments were made seeking clarification on features and details of the car. @Foundation and @Mach.86 asked about the front license plate holder, vibrations while driving, and whether there were any issues with various components of the vehicle. @greenerdays11 answered these inquiries, mentioning the previous owner's choice for the European license plate and assuring potential buyers of the car's smooth ride and condition, while also clarifying the status of the optional 19" AMG wheels that were listed on the build sheet.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the mismatched tire brands on a luxury vehicle, as pointed out by @oldcanuck, and inquiries about the availability of the original 19" AMG wheels were also noted as @Foundation expressed skepticism about them still being available. These comments reflect a level of caution from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's authenticity and overall quality, despite the seller's reassurances about its excellent condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Gncwesthills described the vehicle as a seamless tank, suggesting a strong build quality and durability. @DG2Motorsportz expressed enthusiasm for the bike, specifically appreciating the uniqueness of its big muffler, indicating a positive reception to the vehicle's distinctive features. Additionally, @RetroRiders highlighted the bike's excellent condition and originality, further reinforcing the attractive aspects of this vehicle.
Neutral: @azisparadise inquired about the cold start video and expressed concern about potential engine smoking, showing curiosity about the bike's functionality. @FrankMACV shared a nostalgic memory about a similar motorcycle, contributing to the discussion around the model without specifically praising or criticizing it, while also asking about the age of the tires. @RetroRiders addressed these inquiries by providing details about the cold start video and the bike's smoking, along with the age of the tires and mentioning common practices related to this model.
Negative: The comments included concerns regarding the condition of the bike, particularly from @azisparadise and @FrankMACV, who questioned whether the engine was smoking upon a cold start and inquired about the age of the tires. @RetroRiders responded by admitting that the tires were approximately 25 years old and noted that the bike had not been on the road since 1998, which might imply potential issues with its longevity and performance. These points could detract from the overall appeal of the vehicle for prospective buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @brooksgn commented on the vehicle's excellent investment, having sold for only 85k in 2021. @Kurt_T noted its pristine condition, referring to it as mint and predicting a high auction price. @FordsFTW expressed nostalgia, stating the car deserves to be displayed in a museum due to its significance and personal connection. @arkbuildernoah (The Seller) emphasized this vehicle as one of the finest examples seen to date and welcomed participation in the auction.
Neutral: @Canadianclassics2 showed interest in seeing how the auction performs in the post-Covid market. @Z282SLO described the Cobra as a stunning time capsule but raised the concern about potential excitement around the auction versus its actual condition. @RedGTvert highlighted the vehicle's desirability and clean condition, hoping it performs well at auction. In contrast, @dkyfxit remarked on the unusual glossiness of the undercarriage paint, suggesting that it appears too red to be factory finish.
Negative: Multiple commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's undersides; @Foxjunk noted signs of new paint and overspray, indicating possible issues. @idrivemine dismissed the notion that the undercarriage paint would be factory applied, emphasizing that excessive overspray could imply cover-up work on previous defects. Similarly, @2caddiesandaMach1 defended a repaint but highlighted how many cars were altered from factory condition, suggesting this might affect its current value. The overall sentiment indicated skepticism regarding the vehicle's unaltered originality, pointing to a potential decline in value due to the non-original detailing.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments reflect admiration and excitement for the vehicle, noting its excellent presentation through numerous photographs. @CarDogThreePedals expressed a love for the wagon, particularly praising its opening picture and details like the air cleaner and exhaust fitment. @bbmach reminisced about the great body style of the wagon and mentioned it as a cool choice, even wishing for A/C to make it more appealing for a long drive back to GA. @ratpack1968 commended the photography quality, labeling it as some of the best ever seen on Bring a Trailer, underscoring the effort into the car's visual appeal.
Neutral: Several comments provided practical and inquisitive feedback regarding specifics of the vehicle. @ccavalleror asked details about the type of differential and whether the gas tank has been serviced, which suggests a keen interest in the vehicle's performance aspects. Furthermore, @Fleche_dOr engaged in a reflective conversation about past experiences with similar models, including nostalgic moments associated with their former car, demonstrating an emotional connection to the vehicle's legacy. Commenters like @JaST made technical inquiries about the engine, indicating a mixture of appreciation and desire for more detailed information.
Negative: However, there were also critiques and concerns raised by some users. @EricWDeaton pointed out that the vast number of pictures could be overwhelming, leading to the potential oversight of damage revealed in them. This was echoed by @738drvr, who questioned whether repair work on noticeable damage would be undertaken. Such feedback highlights a sense of caution among potential buyers regarding vehicle condition before making bids. Additionally, @Blueox76 raised a concern about the apparent unconventional attachment of a strut tower bar, suggesting a desire for clarity on the vehicle's modifications.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @firstclassauto1 (The Seller) expressed optimism about the vehicle, stating that it would make someone a nice clean piece. This indicates a belief in the quality and desirability of the car, suggesting that recent events have not diminished the vehicle's value.
Neutral: @ammochugs inquired about the events surrounding the previous sale, indicating a level of curiosity or concern about the vehicle's current standing. @seems_lgt also requested a driving video, which shows interest in seeing the vehicle in action but does not imply judgment about its condition.
Negative: @bhenry528 criticized the communication regarding the listing, suggesting that potential buyers might be missing important details. This could reflect negatively on the seller's presentation of the vehicle, which may contribute to concerns among prospective buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciated the truck's condition, with @Davidch1974 describing it as a "beautiful truck in like new condition." @CMC300M called it "Black Beauty" while others like @Tcaputo noted the potential for profit as a flip. The general consensus was that the vehicle was clean and well-maintained, with @VantageAuto indicating that it sold much too cheap given its quality and the history of being climate-controlled and stored by the original owner.
Neutral: Comments included inquiries about the vehicle's features and practical suggestions. For instance, @DeanFrat70 asked about the number of keys and a window sticker, while @70Cudalife pondered why a truck this nice would come with plastic hubcaps. @elcaminoss00 and @Car_collector expressed the sentiment that the truck should be driven rather than stored, with one suggesting routine maintenance to keep it running smoothly.
Negative: Some concerns arose focusing on practical issues and potential downsides. @tp808 asked if all recalls had been addressed and about the AC performance, while @chirodan sought clarification on the perceived "5.7 Hemi MDS problem." Additionally, @Sweptside pointed out a discrepancy with tire sizes, hinting at possibly overlooked details that could affect the vehicle's value or functionality.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @DRIVEGUY expresses enjoyment of the vehicle's creativity, highlighting its unique design. @Moparmadness also appreciates the creative aspect of the extended cab and wishes the seller luck with the auction. @Dollycat3 calls the build absolutely superb, further emphasizing the exceptional quality of the truck.
Neutral: @RacerX69 raises questions about the possible lengthening of the doors and points out the differing door strikers. @zillah reminisces about a 54 Chevy truck, noting the importance of the back seat for luggage rather than passenger comfort, while @ShineOn agrees on the added space being valuable for trips. @alexg182 (The Seller) acknowledges @zillah's comment and suggests that the truck feels like a sports car despite its old truck interior, confirming some comfort in the rear seating.
Negative: @Moparmadness expresses disappointment in the back seats considering the effort put into the extended cab. @alexg182 (The Seller) also admits that long hours in the rear seat wouldn't be ideal, hinting at some discomfort despite the truck's overall appeal. This suggests that while the vehicle excels in creativity and design, it may fall short in passenger comfort.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @PricePro provided prompt responses to inquiries, indicating that the vehicle retains the balance of the 5/100 Powertrain warranty and confirming it is equipped with a trailer hitch. They also mentioned the presence of solar panels for off-grid capabilities, which is a desirable feature for potential buyers looking for additional power sources during travel.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on various specifications and features, such as the upgraded suspension brand, aftermarket wheels, and detailed information on battery capacity. Others requested confirmation on the type of drivetrain, size of waste and water tanks, and existing fixtures like wooden shower inserts. @PricePro acknowledged these questions and aimed to provide thorough answers, indicating a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: @morrietrautman and others pointed out concerns about the lack of swivel functionality for the front seats, which may limit comfort for some users. There's also a persistent inquiry about whether the toilet is a cassette type and the dimensions of the bed, indicating uncertainty about the vehicle's living comfort and usability. Additionally, the request for more visual evidence of sleeping arrangements suggests that prospective buyers are looking for reassurances on the space and layout.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @KenHenderson expresses nostalgia for the 1990 MKIII Turbo, highlighting its personal significance and praising its potential as a desirable vehicle. @RumbleAuto describes the car as an absolutely lovely example, and @Casper42 mentions this car appears amazing, having previously owned similar models. @SkipShot commends the seller for the care given to the vehicle, calling it a fine example of a non-molested beauty, and appreciates the original parts still intact.
Neutral: @Dennis-D (The Seller) provides detailed information about the car's condition, features, and maintenance history, emphasizing the care it has received. The description covers the original color, maintenance work done on the engine, and the availability of original documents. Additionally, @wade9111 inquires about the shop used for engine work, indicating interest in expert maintenance on similar vehicles.
Negative: @sidepipes raises concerns regarding the head gaskets in similar models, citing a common issue with the 7M engines, although he acknowledges this particular car has been well-prepared for sale. @2002WS6 discusses the head bolt issue, suggesting that addressing it proactively is necessary for long-term reliability. Despite this, no serious criticism is directed at the vehicle itself, as most comments reflect a sense of admiration or personal anecdotes relating to the model.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the classic VW Convertible, emphasizing its charm and appeal in perfect settings like Sausalito. @milage noted that it feels like a dream to own such a vehicle in a picturesque location. @kc_vw, the seller, shared a heartfelt connection to these cars, recalling family road trips in their youth with classic VW models, highlighting the nostalgic joy they bring. @barrelguy appreciated the vehicle's fun nature, mentioning how it's great for family trips down the coast, reinforcing the positive sentiments around its use for memorable experiences.
Neutral: @kc_vw provided additional context regarding the vehicle's condition and history, mentioning an engine rebuild in 2009 and clarifying the mileage since the changeover. These details alongside invoices available in the gallery give prospective buyers a clearer understanding of the car's upkeep. Although some users mentioned minor issues, such as paint bubbles and a chip, @kc_vw responded with honesty and provided photos for better inspection, emphasizing a transparent approach in the listing.
Negative: However, there were concerns raised by commenters, particularly @Erooni, who pointed out the presence of paint bubbles on the right front panel and asked for close-up pictures. Although @kc_vw acknowledged this and assured that there are no other significant rust areas, the mention of imperfections could deter potential buyers looking for a pristine vehicle. Overall, while the comments reflected affection and nostalgia towards the VW, they also highlighted the importance of addressing cosmetic issues for potential purchasers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's condition and unique specifications. @nexusautobrokers described it as "L O V E L Y", while @S2kTi praised the rarity of its features. @getouth emphasized the value of purchasing from a meticulous owner, reinforcing the trust in the vehicle's care under the current owner, @kmetz. Other enthusiasts appreciated the rare trifecta of options available on the M3, showcasing the demand for such a specification among car enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several questions concerning the car's maintenance and history surfaced during the discussion. @zipster21 inquired about the originality of the rod bearings and clutch, which @kmetz confirmed as original parts due to the car not being driven aggressively. @Benfica addressed service records, while @xiaoshushu noted the normalcy of the cold start needed for the V8 engine. These comments reflect a practical interest in the vehicle's upkeep and historical context, emphasizing the importance of service documentation and maintenance details.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns regarding potential issues with the vehicle. @maxwell_silver questioned its winter use and noted signs of rust or corrosion, while @Nickyd_69 asked for close-up images of minor dings. These points could suggest worries about the vehicle's aesthetic and structural integrity, especially if the rust issues are substantial. Additionally, @Chillynder's inquiry about throttle actuators hinted at an underlying concern about performance components, reflecting the high standards and scrutiny that enthusiasts often have when considering a performance car.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed great enthusiasm for the vehicle, with @knoxpainting865 describing it simply as "Nice!" and @Gottago indicating the potential for high resale value with the phrase, "I see big bucks for this one." @Ryed appreciates the enhancements, mentioning the "Milltek exhaust" and expressing optimism for the sale, while @legless477 refers to it as a "Beautiful example!" The seller, @henryw984, shares personal nostalgia and passion for the Audi brand, stating this model is "peak Audi" for him, which resonates with car enthusiasts. He mentions modifications like a Lamborghini steering wheel and bucket seats, adding to the vehicle's desirability. Overall, these comments reflect a strong positive sentiment toward the car's appeal and potential.
Neutral: A few comments focus on technical specifics and inquiries about the vehicle’s history. @UDFlyent10 asks about previous repairs related to carbon build-up and whether proactive measures were taken for common mechanical issues, demonstrating a keen interest in the vehicle's condition. The seller responds with detailed information about past maintenance, including a carbon clean and clutch replacement, indicating transparency in addressing potential concerns. @TrevorG83 contributes to the conversation by clarifying that issues mentioned in the inquiry are not common for this model, emphasizing a level of knowledge among the commenters.
Negative: There are hints of disappointment among some commenters, particularly regarding the removal of desirable features. @buymeajuice expresses regret that the car has had the "euro wheel and seats" parted out, suggesting that retaining these features might have made the car more appealing or valuable. This sentiment highlights a common concern among potential buyers who appreciate original modifications. While @UDFlyent10 raises valid mechanical concerns regarding wear-and-tear components, the seller's confident reassurances may not fully alleviate apprehensions, reflecting a potential disconnect between buyers' expectations and the actual condition or modifications of the car.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Chris_DeMuth_Jr loves the vehicle, expressing excitement with a simple affirmation: "I love it." @DethMerc praises the steering wheel hanger as "bad to the bone," highlighting a particular component that stands out. @boaboyoz describes the rat rod as "outrageous" and "bodacious," further emphasizing its cool factor with slogans like "Fanbloodytastic build" and an enthusiastic thumbs up. @mark_99 admires the build's impressive brain-trust of Buford Clonts, Keith Black, and Grumpy Jenkins, labeling it a "gnarly build" and suggesting a fitting name like "Heavy Metal Thunder." @Discobob appreciates the vehicle's unique experience it offers, especially in a dating context, calling it absolutely wonderful. @CCHampton sees it as a cohesive work of art, noting the difficult balance achieved in the build.
Neutral: @onepunch (The Seller) provides useful insights about the vehicle, noting that he reluctantly has to sell due to lack of storage and is open to questions about the car, which he claims is a "pretty sick build." He shares information about the car’s airbag suspension to clarify its ride height for questions raised by @Shemagra and @mgoodacre. @mgoodacre inquires about various components such as the airbag system's integrity and the driving experience, demonstrating a thoughtful engagement with the vehicle's features. @Sledhead44 seeks specific measurements between the seat width and legroom, showing consideration for comfort in operating the vehicle.
Negative: @CliffElam raises a valid question about the limited mileage on the vehicle, suggesting a potential lack of use which could be concerning for buyers. @41Willy points out a potential downside regarding heat during summer driving due to lack of insulation, raising concerns about its practicality. @Jerbo mentions the chain welded hinges as a unique detail that adds to the vehicle's appeal, contrasting with the critical point @denny6.53 makes about wanting more information and pictures for better understanding. Some comments suggest discomfort about driving visibility and seating ergonomics, like @JLopeZ32, indicating that aspects like the roof height and the car's dynamics, combined with personal sizing, could be problematic for prospective buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Oldguywiththekeys appreciates the relevance of the vehicle's body style. @rcavictor lauds its beauty and commends the Seller for reverting to period-correct wheels. @measton64 highlights the significance of the 1965 Corvair as a precursor to the iconic '67 Camaro, while @Gloccamora acknowledges it as GM's response to Porsche. @CLTLarry shares a nostalgic love for similar models, praising the two-speed Powerglide's performance and lamenting how Ralph Nader negatively influenced the Corvair's reputation. @PhilVair counters this by stating that it was the Mustang that overshadowed the Corvair. Finally, @OEforME calls the car handsome and expresses interest in its condition.
Neutral: @Paul85 corrects the interior color code, noting the exterior colors are accurately represented while emphasizing the rarity of a black exterior with a white and black interior. @Dan1966 inquires about potential repairs to the floor pans, and @Hubbie asks about shipping services for the vehicle. @oldfordlover expresses concern about the condition of the padded dash and mechanical status, wanting further details. In response to these queries, @borowags (The Seller) asserts that there are no floor pan repairs and shares that there is no rust detected, while also clarifying shipping options and addressing seller contact methods.
Negative: Concerns are raised by @oldfordlover regarding the vague description of the car's mechanical condition, emphasizing the need for clarity beyond "it runs and drives." @OEforME similarly asks for more specifics on the term "mostly original paint," hinting at potential repairs. @borowags (The Seller) admits to a lack of professional expertise yet remains open to inquiries, encouraging further inspection or requests for additional photographs. Despite his enthusiasm for the car as a true survivor, there are evident frustrations in trying to convey its condition adequately.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @clarkto shared their enthusiasm stating that the car looks fantastic, well preserved and always makes them smile each time the engine starts. They mentioned having enjoyed driving it and highlighted the immense fun they had, especially cruising with the roof open in nice weather. They are looking forward to passing the car on to someone who will enjoy it just as much as they have, displaying a strong emotional connection to the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters asked for clarifications and additional details. @Nero164QV inquired about the keys, to which @clarkto confirmed that both original keys would be included. Comments regarding technical aspects like the date codes of the tires were addressed by @clarkto, who explained the reasons behind the axle rebuild and affirmed that there are no outstanding recalls for this specific model. Technical inquiries about the vehicle's performance, such as downshifting noises and headroom for taller drivers with the sunroof, also reflect an ongoing interest among buyers about the car's functionality and history.
Negative: There were concerns raised regarding some cosmetic imperfections and repairs. @rlhug1954 noted that the rims seemed to be scuffed, which @clarkto confirmed as curb rash rather than road rash. @mrneddles questioned the replacement title, and concerns about a previous issue with the sunroof and intermittent noises when downshifting were discussed. @ASEMasterTech expressed skepticism about the cost-effectiveness of certain repairs and had doubts about whether they would enhance the vehicle's value, indicating some apprehension among potential buyers about the car's overall condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Numerous comments highlight the impressive performance and aesthetics of the vehicle, particularly the Yenko Camaro. @Ninetres describes it as a 'beautiful Camaro' that is 'perfect', while @maddog6198 and @Shaka58 express their excitement about the bidding process, signifying positive interest in the vehicle. Enthusiasts like @Fischdog and @GLHatWFO praise the car's cold start and the power it generates, emphasizing its overwhelming presence on the road and its rare status. Overall, the feedback from various commenters suggests a strong admiration for the Camaro's performance capabilities and visual appeal, positioning it as a highly desirable vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @Esarjeant, provides detailed specifications and information about the vehicle's history and upgrades, including its delivery date and various option codes. There are inquiries from commenters regarding the car's known issues, leaks, and warranty status, which @Esarjeant addresses by affirming that there are no known issues and that the car drives excellently. Additionally, @MS3DALE raises a point about the stainless exhaust system appearing somewhat rough, indicating a matter for potential clarification without overt negativity. Discussions continue about the vehicle's octane needs and upgrades made, with @Motor_Fast mentioning potential enhancements that may affect the car's value and performance, reflecting a moderate level of interest in its specifications.
Negative: A few concerns are raised in the comments, with @redbull1790 specifically asking about leaks or known issues, which prompts @Esarjeant to reassess the vehicle's condition, insisting that there are no problems. However, @Kev9922 warns that running the vehicle on 91 octane could lead to catastrophic failures, emphasizing a potential downside in maintaining the car. Furthermore, @MS3DALE and @Certifiedfunds engage in a back-and-forth, suggesting some divisiveness among commenters, which could detract from the overall positivity surrounding the vehicle. These interactions hint at underlying worries regarding the Camaro’s upkeep and operational guidelines, which might influence potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments reflect a nostalgic fondness for the Chevrolet Vega, with @HairOnFire noting that they never would have imagined being so enamored with a Vega nearly half a century later. @Erioc shares their appreciation for the Vega's unique design, while @VTDavid mentions the striking red interior, expressing surprise at how few of these cars seem to have survived in good condition. Multiple users, such as @2014LTDLTZ and @cyclemikey, commend the vehicle for its preservation and encourage the seller to provide more photos, showing a genuine interest in the car's condition. @Fatty2828 (The Seller) highlights the car's low mileage and promising state, aiming to connect with potential buyers by sharing personal anecdotes and addressing queries, enhancing the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: Some commentators share their practical experiences with their own Vegas and express their interest in this particular vehicle. @option58 reminisces about his time with the Vega while delivering pizzas, and @Rufioboy recounts his history as a proud owner of a Vega that ultimately led him to transition to different car brands. Meanwhile, @Fatty2828 (The Seller) actively engages the audience by answering questions, providing additional photos and insights about the Vega's maintenance and history, bridging the gap between nostalgia and practical concerns. There are practical queries about the vehicle, such as whether the A/C works (@budlight12) and thorough inspections for rust-prone areas, highlighting a mix of appreciation and ongoing curiosity about the car's actual condition.
Negative: Several comments disclose troubling aspects of the Vega's reputation and personal experiences with the vehicle, painting a less favorable picture. @ToyBox1 recalls a severe engine failure shortly after purchasing their Vega, amplifying concerns about reliability that many share. @sharkie104 and @ShredderRob share anecdotes reflecting the problematic history of engine failures with Vegas, emphasizing the frustrations associated with oil consumption. Skepticism regarding the claimed condition and mileage of this specific Vega is voiced by @vegavairbob, who notes discrepancies that raise questions about the car's history, while @Mazdaseeker reflects on the broader issues of the Vega's legacy, suggesting that despite the fond memories, the Vega was also a source of considerable frustration for its owners. This combination of nostalgia and critique forms a complex view of the Vega in popular memory.
|
2019 Ford F-250 Super Duty Lariat FX4 Crew Cab 4x4 w/ Snow Plow
1FT7W2B60KED49627
Lot 199615
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Choopie mentioned that they know several people who are interested in a snowplow and will refer them to the seller, suggesting that there is a market interest in the truck. @tangogod expressed strong interest in the truck and his eagerness to check it out in person reinforces some positive energy around the vehicle. Overall, these comments indicate that the truck has a potential customer base that finds it appealing for snowplowing work.
Neutral: @mike_BurkeBros (The Seller) provided clarifications about the truck's usage, stating that it was not heavily used for plowing in its early years and was mainly for touch-ups and larger parking lot clearings, which may suggest it has been kept in relatively good condition for a plow vehicle. He also noted that there was no salt spreading with the truck, which can be relevant for buyers concerned about corrosion and maintenance. The details shared about the specifications and features of the truck may help potential buyers assess its value objectively.
Negative: @KawaZmoto raised concerns about the truck's previous functionalities, specifically asking if any salt spreading had been done, indicating a concern about rust or damage from road salt. Additionally, @Impala6519 questioned potential issues with the moonroof leaking or door locks freezing, which suggests there might be reliability concerns. These comments introduce a level of skepticism regarding maintenance and durability that potential buyers could find troubling.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm for the 996 Turbo, highlighting its performance and rarity. @01996tt mentions it as a 'sinister looking machine', which captures the allure of this model. @knoxpainting865 appreciates that these cars are finally receiving the respect they deserve, and another user notes that it is a bombproof platform with the X50 turbo option. @Dandan401 shares that the 996 Turbo motors are bulletproof, mentioning owners who have run their cars to impressive mileages without significant issues, reinforcing the vehicle's reliability and value. Overall, there is a consensus that the 996 Turbo is both thrilling to drive and a good investment.
Neutral: Several comments provide practical insights into the vehicle's details and specifications. @Dfcarlso (The Seller) clarifies the car's location and mentions additional parts that can be shipped separately. There is some discussion about common maintenance issues and parts, such as the IMS bearing, which @toddjonas attempts to explain in detail, noting that the Mezger engine differs from earlier models. Some users express curiosity about the production numbers of the X50 variant, with @c041v providing context and insights into the vehicle's rarity based on its specifications. However, the atmosphere remains factual, with users sharing personal experiences without overly praising or criticizing the car.
Negative: While overall sentiment is positive, a few comments bring up potential pitfalls associated with owning the vehicle. @saxonthebeach critiques the need for a new front lip spoiler due to sun damage, which detracts from the car's aesthetic. @Bjclark1969 warns about common issues like vacuum and boost leaks that could arise, suggesting a level of caution for prospective buyers regarding repair needs. Concerns about upkeep are shared by several users, with detailed anecdotes of their experiences with maintenance, hinting that while the car offers great performance, it also requires attentive care. There’s also a note from @gmcculla indicating a flagged comment, suggesting that not all remarks are beneficial, which adds a layer of caution to the conversation around the vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @SuperKram praised the bike's handling, describing it as surprisingly good and the best handling cruiser he has experienced, especially in the Texas hill country. He also noted the smooth and powerful engine, emphasizing the increased midrange torque, as well as the quality of the brakes and the 6-speed transmission. @Bernard shared fond memories of the bike, likening it to the legendary CHP police Guzzis and expressing a preference for it over Harleys. @Mouse51 felt that Moto Guzzi really excelled in creating this model.
Neutral: @Idealcars (The Seller) provided helpful background information about the motorcycle's history, indicating that the bike was carefully maintained by its previous owner and has always been parked in a garage. The seller also mentioned completing necessary maintenance like new tires, a battery, and an oil change to refresh the bike. @VSC pointed out a correction regarding the bike’s engine model, asserting that it was equipped with the earlier 1064cc pushrod engine and five-speed transmission, while @Keruxer inquired about vehicle registration to avoid fees during DMV transfer.
Negative: Some commenters expressed additional concerns. @AzBBC inquired about the build date on the tires, pushing for verification of the vehicle's age. @RockenJag requested higher resolution photographs of the handlebars, suggesting the need for better representation of the bike's condition. Moreover, @RamblinMan reflected on the emotional aspect of motorcycle ownership, reminiscing about a late friend's experiences with similar models, pointing to the nostalgia associated with this particular Guzzi and hinting at the potential it holds for future adventures.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight a strong appreciation for its aesthetic and performance qualities. @ajmr2 described the car as the definition of an S2000 that has been enjoyed, while @crackystride noted it as a perfect original example with a hardtop and a sense of pride in ownership. Many commenters, including @fpatdriscoll (The Seller), expressed joy in driving Hondas, emphasizing that S2000s are meant to be driven, with several expressing a desire to take it out for fun activities like attending an Angels game. @fpatdriscoll (The Seller) also described the vehicle’s great condition, noting recent maintenance like a new radiator, further boosting enthusiasm about its reliability and performance.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific details regarding the vehicle’s maintenance and features. @fryhin asked about a compression test, while @kcrew wanted to confirm whether the soft top fits in the trunk with the hard top installed. @503Mel expressed curiosity about the timing chain history, and @Wiseguy0853 requested information regarding valve adjustments and potential rust issues. @fpatdriscoll (The Seller) responded to many of these inquiries, providing clarifications about maintenance history, including where the car was serviced and assurances about its overall condition. The dialogues reflected a blend of genuine interest and careful consideration of the vehicle's history.
Negative: Some comments expressed concerns regarding the vehicle’s maintenance history, such as @fryhin’s inquiry about the compression test and @503Mel’s question about the cam belt change. Others like @997TTS pointed out the driving video's limitations, questioning why the gears weren't fully tested. Additionally, @Wiseguy0853 raised valid concerns about possible rust that could affect the car's integrity, demonstrating a cautious approach among potential buyers. @VerbalDiarrhea also inquired about the original Honda radio, highlighting areas where some might feel the vehicle lacks original components. Overall, these comments suggest that while the car is well-regarded, potential buyers are keen to ensure that all aspects of its condition are thoroughly vetted before making a purchase.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commentators praise the BMW 2002tii as a benchmark for excellence in classic cars, with @RonP calling it the "benchmark of all things BMW." @HlBlanton describes it as the "dream incarnate," suggesting this car embodies the best qualities one could hope for. @SILOmike goes further, stating that this car is the most perfect example of a tii he has ever seen, highlighting the meticulous care it has received. Other remarks express excitement about the car's history and aesthetics, with @carnutty stating it is "absolutely gorgeous" and well done, while @Gheemer reflects on the emotional nostalgia it evokes, akin to flipping through a cherished magazine of one's youth.
Neutral: Some comments take a more tempered view, questioning aspects of the car's auction history. @Wgris notes its third sale in a relatively short span, raising concerns about market demand. @02911dog shares a hopeful outlook for the seller but expresses skepticism about the car surpassing $100k due to current market conditions. Additionally, @Collins4A mentions the unpredictability of auction prices and the nuances of bidding, observing that current bidders often provide insights into the potential outcome based on their past engagements. @911r (the seller) responds to these critiques with a detailed account of his ownership history, reassuring interested buyers about the car's quality and encouraging open communication.
Negative: Conversely, some commenters bring up potential drawbacks. @bbmcm points out an exterior issue with the pinch molding on the driver's A-pillar, while @Dcmj remembers his past experiences and expresses regret over selling a similar vehicle. @markleftcoast laments the absence of air conditioning, noting it as a dealbreaker for his wife. Additionally, @Letwalesbe expresses concerns about the left gauge being incorrect, which requires fixing, adding to the list of minor issues that detract from the car's otherwise stellar presentation. Overall, these criticisms, while valid, are mostly balanced by the overwhelming admiration expressed by many for the vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters generally expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting features such as the unique 4-speed transaxle and the appealing wheels, particularly the ATS cookie cutters. @eddieames noted the car's cool oil door and described it as a nice 911. @raynekat emphasized the desirability of the 4-speed transmission and appreciated the wheels, suggesting they were a significant enhancement to the car's overall aesthetic. @Superdave847 praised the seller for their honest and thorough posting, reflecting a positive sentiment towards the transparency in the vehicle's presentation.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification about the vehicle's specifications and condition. @kaeferkaufer inquired about the transaxle model, while @Tripledigit asked if there were any engine leaks or mechanical issues. The seller, @Elizajean, provided detailed responses, confirming that the car has a numbers matching engine with no known leaks, although she indicated a potential issue with the sunroof seal. There were inquiries regarding the installation of the original sportomatic and requests for additional photographs highlighting any rust, particularly around the torsion bar tube, which @Twickes addressed.
Negative: Negative comments focused on the choice of the 4-speed transmission over a 5-speed, with @356dax expressing disappointment about the modification, suggesting that most future buyers would likely replace it. Additionally, concerns about rust, particularly mentioned by @David_P and @PdxBryan, highlighted vulnerabilities like the left kidney bowl and the correlation between the open sunroof and deterioration. Some users, like @mn911moby, questioned the seller's minimal use of the car and its maintenance, indicating doubts about the overall condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the 1999 Toyota Land Cruiser, with several users emphasizing its durability and maintenance. @ScubaJ noted the potential longevity of the vehicle despite its high mileage, while @TNRovers shared a personal anecdote about their trusty Sequoia reaching 700k miles, expressing confidence in the Land Cruiser's ability to do the same. @EmertFE highlighted how the vehicle's mileage actually instills confidence in buyers, indicating a belief in its reliability. Additionally, @Jazman humorously suggested that the Cruiser's limited stops may signify its legendary status, further reinforcing the vehicle's reputation.
Neutral: Many comments included detailed inquiries about the vehicle's condition, specification, and history, showcasing community engagement. @oat2 asked about the upholstery condition while @Munch1950 wondered about leaks. The seller, @HadaVega33, provided thorough responses regarding the vehicle's maintenance and features, reiterating its excellent shape and lack of fluid leaks. Several commenters like @FA20FTW requested specific information on components and repairs, indicating an interest in the vehicle's overall condition and history, which the seller addressed openly and responsively.
Negative: Some users raised concerns about past minor damage reports and potential rust issues, although @HadaVega33 clarified these points, citing professional assessments and repairs undertaken for any rust discovered prior to their ownership. @mfu77 expressed concerns about rust sighting during inspections, while @benznotmercedes mentioned potential rattling, indicating some apprehension about higher-mileage vehicles. Additionally, @FA20FTW pointed out condensation in the fog light housings, prompting questions about their origins, showing that despite the positive feedback, there were reservations about specific aspects of the vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's beauty and elegance, highlighting its luxurious features and overall charm. @TheJabroniJoe referred to the interior as reminiscent of a modern-day Rolls, akin to the RR Silver Shadow of the 80s. @Dollycat3 described the car as stunning, with a commanding presence, admiring details such as the illuminated hood ornament and exquisite woodwork. @OWLBYRD expressed a strong desire to own the vehicle, calling it beautiful and a good fit for those interested in high-end luxury cars. @Wob (The Seller) underscored the car's impeccable condition and thorough care, noting its visually appealing colors and luxurious comfort. These sentiments contribute to a collective appreciation for this Rolls Royce's craftsmanship and allure.
Neutral: Comments provided a mix of inquiries and observations about the car. @kingfrog33 asked for the build sheet, showcasing a genuine interest in its specifications. @intlcgr highlighted a potential discrepancy regarding the convertible top's color, suggesting there might be a misunderstanding. @Gipper50 inquired about the location where the vehicle could be seen, emphasizing the desire for transparency in the purchasing process. @Mosab90 raised several detailed questions regarding the car’s condition, previous repair history, and the performance of its components, which reflected a proactive approach to potential bidding. @Wob (The Seller) responded to several inquiries, indicating a willingness to engage with prospective buyers and address their concerns openly.
Negative: A few commenters posed concerns regarding the vehicle's functioning and potential issues. @Drujon questioned the condition of the taillights, which prompted a clarification from @Wob (The Seller) about LED refresh rates affecting their appearance on camera. @Pilipinc and @H.H. both inquired about the status of the check engine light, suggesting a lack of confidence in the car's mechanical reliability. The mention of the driver's side auto door closer button needing replacement raised a flag about the car's electronic components. Overall, these comments reveal a cautious approach from some users, highlighting the importance of transparency and reassurance regarding the vehicle's operational aspects.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg shares nostalgic memories, recalling fun times riding mopeds like the Puch Newport II back in Michigan. @Fletcher.linkedin, the seller, expresses excitement about the auction, emphasizing his eagerness to provide thorough answers to potential buyers. He highlights the history and quality of the mopeds, noting their well-preserved condition after being cared for in a heated garage, which has kept them rust-free. Additionally, @Fletcher.linkedin mentions how the mopeds are equipped with original paint and decals, making them attractive to collectors and enthusiasts alike.
Neutral: @Fletcher.linkedin provides valuable insights into the vehicle's history, detailing that they were originally owned by his neighbor and that he acquired them while assisting the owner's widow. He explains the attention given to maintenance, including a thorough tune-up and the options regarding tire replacement that buyers can consider. Furthermore, both @Memkaplan and @drivinglegends ask practical questions about speed and tire sourcing, indicating the level of interest and engagement from potential bidders.
Negative: @Fletcher.linkedin notes that one of the mopeds has a top speed of only 15 to 16 mph, adding that it may stall and requires adjustments to the throttle and speedometer cables. Some commenters seem to expect functionalities such as individual starter videos that have yet to be provided, as seen in @Memkaplan's request for more detailed demonstrations. This frustration could affect their overall impression of the auction, especially if their questions are only partially answered.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BabyD69 describes the vehicle as stylish, suggesting it offers a pleasurable travel experience. @Carmen214 acknowledges Pleasure-Way as a reputable RV manufacturer, which adds to the perceived quality of the vehicle. @joedon555 has shared personal experiences, noting that the vehicle has never been smoked in, has original tires, and has been used for enjoyable family trips, indicating it has been well taken care of.
Neutral: @Carmen214 inquires about the vehicle's mileage and asks for further details regarding the collision repair, suggesting an interest in the vehicle’s condition. @Hunter42 seeks clarification on available warranties, while @mytoys asks about towing capacity, indicating that potential buyers are considering practical aspects of the vehicle's functionality. @leterun poses specific questions about the tank systems used for heating and generating hot water, as well as how the generator operates.
Negative: @joedon555 mentions a previous accident and describes the damage along with its repair status, which might raise concerns regarding the vehicle's history. He also notes that the generator and air conditioning ran rough after not being used for several months, hinting at potential maintenance issues. Additionally, @joedon555 implies uncertainty about any warranties, stating that one would assume none are applicable due to the vehicle being five years old, which could deter some buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @SnookMemphis praises the Eldorado's unique color, quality records, and overall appeal for fans of the model. @Dollycat3 calls it an absolutely beautiful light gray car, echoing positive sentiments shared by others like @lincolnsandcaddies who fondly recalls his own Cadillac experiences. @RickFisher expresses admiration for the Light Greyfern color and reflects on previous ownership of a similar vehicle, further demonstrating the vehicle's nostalgic value to potential buyers.
Neutral: @OhioTiger, the seller, shares sentimental reflections on the vehicle’s history and his personal connection to the Cadillac brand since the 1980s. He explains details about the car, including its pristine condition, low mileage, and various features like the AC rebuild and cruise control functionality. Various commenters like @StanGB request additional information about the car's functions, while @Toolman32 and @bigal666 inquire about the air suspension system, indicating a need for further clarification on the vehicle's mechanics.
Negative: @Vinipizzetta points out possible blemishes on the door panel, raising concerns about the car's condition despite the seller's reassurance that it has been well cared for. @hooper wonders about the past of the diesel engines in these models, hinting at a broader nostalgia and potential concern regarding the car's performance. Other concerns include issues raised by @cheezboy regarding the non-operable air ride suspension and its impact on driving, conveying a sense of uncertainty about the vehicle's maintenance and overall reliability.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance and build quality. @boaboyoz described it as a "rambunctious red Biscayne" and praised the build with enthusiasm. @UsernameX considered the classic Chevy to be great looking, humorously suggesting that it needed them behind the wheel, indicating a strong appreciation for the vehicle's allure. Overall, the comments reflected a genuine interest and excitement about the car's aesthetic and craftsmanship.
Neutral: Several comments focused on requests for additional information regarding the vehicle. @Alexx_mz inquired about pictures showcasing the car with the suspension lowered, wanting clarity on the suspension components used. @26leech26 (The Seller) responded affirmatively, mentioning that pictures were available that demonstrated both raised and lowered states, albeit @Alexx_mz mentioned they didn't see them. @LoggerDan mentioned watching driving videos, which indicates an interest in experiential content but remains neutral about the car's condition.
Negative: Only one comment expressed a potential concern, as @yoda1201 questioned the absence of a shipping quote option. This suggests a sense of frustration or confusion regarding logistics related to the sale. However, this remark did not detract significantly from the overall positive perception of the vehicle, as the predominant sentiment was favorable.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @emanrace (The Seller) provides an overview of the auction for the Ferrari California T, emphasizing that the vehicle is in 100% original condition and looks like new. He mentions numerous desirable accessories, including books, a factory Ferrari cover, and a battery tender, which add to the vehicle’s value. @Nahasmotorcars and others praise the car's stunning color combination and low mileage, with many commenting on the vehicle's appeal as an everyday driver. @hardhead7525 states that the California T is a wonderful vehicle for weekend trips and errands, emphasizing the favorable build and color configuration.
Neutral: Several users pointed out the discrepancy regarding the Magnaride system. @mikejorgensen2002 and @choigilligan clarified that while the vehicle has a comfort setting, it does not have the Magnaride feature, which was a point of contention among commenters. @emrace acknowledged this mistake, reflecting an active dialogue that seeks to ensure all potential buyers have accurate information about the vehicle's features. There were also inquiries regarding service records and the condition of various aspects of the car, such as tire tread and wear on the dashboard, which @emanrace addressed promptly.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's authenticity regarding features like the absence of the Magnaride suspension system, which multiple users highlighted—@choigilligan and @mikejorgensen2002 affirmed that this feature is not present. Additionally, @R129SA noted possible bubbling near a vent, questioning the car's overall condition, while @boozerboo inquired about missing elements, such as a window sticker and CarPlay capability. These inquiries suggest a level of scrutiny regarding the car's specifications and condition, as certain expected features were called into question by knowledgeable enthusiasts.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MSchoen100 (The Seller) describes the 1954 Lincoln as a "BEAUTIFUL" and "super fun to drive" vehicle, and notes that he has driven it for over 300 miles in the past year without any issues. Many commenters, including @Dollycat3 and @39mercman, praise the car's aesthetic, emphasizing its beauty, mid-century style, and distinctive color. @shopclubsautogroup also echoes admiration, wishing good luck to the seller, further enhancing the overall positive perspective on the car's appeal.
Neutral: @MSchoen100 (The Seller) provides detailed responses to inquiries regarding the vehicle. He confirms that the car has functional power steering and windows, and addresses @nexttime's questions about the history of the engine replacement and the heating system, clarifying both the main heater’s functionality and that a secondary heater has been removed. In terms of mechanical condition, he mentions minor oil drips and provides information on general maintenance like oil changes and starting recommendations, reflecting a balanced view of the car's condition.
Negative: Several concerns regarding the vehicle have been raised. @nexttime expresses concern about potential body filler and the overall state of the restoration, noting that older body filler could lead to substantial costs for future repairs. @Dean333 questions the loud exhaust, hinting at possible mechanical issues. These comments suggest that while the car is cherished for its aesthetic and driving enjoyment, there are lingering doubts about the vehicle's comprehensive condition that potential bidders should consider.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight the enjoyable driving experience of the FJ Cruiser, with @Shaank94 (The Seller) describing it as a blast to drive thanks to the short shifter and the appealing sound of the TRD exhaust and intake. @tallone7 adds to the positive sentiment by praising the beautiful condition of the frame and undercarriage, emphasizing that this vehicle offers more longevity compared to newer models. Overall, there is a strong sense of enthusiasm and confidence in the vehicle's quality and performance based on the comments.
Neutral: There are mild neutral comments regarding the vehicle's specifications and conditions, with @Dauphinais mentioning a personal fondness for a particular color, suggesting a subjective appreciation rather than a definitive assessment. Additionally, @EnjoyOneLife inquires about the smog certificate, indicating a practical consideration rather than an emotional response to the vehicle, showcasing a typical buyer's concern about compliance and readiness for use in California.
Negative: There are no outright negative comments regarding the FJ Cruiser in the provided remarks. However, the mention by @EnjoyOneLife suggests a need for clarification on documentation, which could imply some concerns about compliance, but it does not present a negative view of the vehicle itself. No criticisms or faults of the FJ Cruiser were noted in the discussions.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz described the vehicle as a 'handsome beast' and appreciated its coolness as a fire truck on BaT, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @Jayscollection (The Seller) expressed gratitude for the interest in the VW fire engine and shared the sentimental value it holds, having driven it to shows and won trophies with his late wife, indicating the vehicle has been well cared for. He confirmed it has been started and moved periodically to keep everything functioning, and that the motor sounds like new.
Neutral: @michaelberkow inquired about the 'Title Only' notation on the vehicle's registration, seeking clarification on its re-registration in other states, and also had questions regarding a previous Alabama license plate. Other comments from @tlcamg and @Jimmyzzzz raised similar queries about the title status and the operational status of the vehicle, suggesting the need for more transparency to assist prospective buyers. @Jayscollection (The Seller) clarified that the vehicle is currently registered as planned non-operational and explained the nature of the title.
Negative: @Jbadial expressed concerns about verifying the functionality of the vehicle's features such as lights, horn, and fuel gauge, indicating a need for assurance before considering a purchase. @Jimmyzzzz also questioned the operational capacity of all emergency lights and sirens, hinting at skepticism regarding the vehicle's readiness for use. Lastly, @Jayscollection (The Seller) acknowledged that due to its current status, the vehicle has not been driven on the streets, leading to further doubts about its usability.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments about the 1991 Nissan 240SX are generally favorable, with many users admiring the car's condition and appearance. @Lorenzoo referred to the car's exterior as beautiful, and @Dgee2244 humorously questioned if it could look any better. @Sil_80 expressed excitement about the vehicle, noting its iconic status and connection to anime culture. Overall, the car is praised for its nostalgic appeal and the quality of modifications done to it, which are mentioned as being guided by a master technician.
Neutral: Regarding the vehicle's details, @sh3llburn inquired about the paperwork and title status, to which @HeritageGruppe confirmed that it has a clean title but is currently registered as non-operational in California. @Number_Six expressed curiosity about the SR20DET engine, and @HeritageGruppe explained its significance as a popular swap that enhances the vehicle's performance. The seller also addressed various questions about the car's modifications, including the front end and suspension details.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle, such as the cracked dashboard, mentioned by @David_P, which detracts from the overall aesthetics, albeit it was acknowledged that replacing or recovering the dash is not a common practice for older cars like this. @mav1178 also pointed out the importance of the registration status in California, noting that the vehicle cannot be registered without passing smog under its current configuration. Additionally, @Sean34 questioned whether the front radiator support had been replaced, suggesting potential discrepancies with the model year.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MagniMan expresses enthusiasm for the motorcycle, noting its low mileage of 13,000 miles, which suggests it has been well-loved. @justpaul appreciates the bike's unique design, considering it 'epic,' and is eager to see the auction's outcome. @pwilliams finds the bike lovely despite others calling it ugly, and appreciates the care taken by its owner. @texascbr enjoys the motorcycle's two-valve engine and recognizes that it was overlooked in the past but is gaining appreciation over time. Overall, there is a sense of admiration for the bike's rarity and unique characteristics.
Neutral: @Wig19, the seller, shares their personal journey with this Bimota, detailing how they came to own it and their experiences riding it. They acknowledge differing opinions on the bike's design and clarify that all mufflers are real, contesting prior comments about them being fake. @NCR600TT discusses the bike's styling, mentioning the designer's background and how perceptions can change with time. This section reflects a balanced view acknowledging both the motorcycle's quirks and its potential appeal to certain riders.
Negative: @jpq criticizes the motorcycle, suggesting it failed to meet aesthetic expectations typically associated with Italian designs and refers to a lack of appeal. @SatchyMoto goes so far as to call it one of the ugliest bikes ever made while @NCR600TT labels a previous statement about Japan's bikes as 'the stupidest statement ever.' @Yamabilly humorously describes it as a DB4 for blind individuals, further emphasizing the mixed to negative sentiment surrounding its styling. These comments point to a significant divide in opinion regarding the motorcycle's visual appeal.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Bgg (The Seller) mentioned that he bought the BMW Z3 for its low mileage and intended to use it as his daily driver. He describes the car as a fantastic vehicle that runs well and is fun to drive, emphasizing that it will make the winning bidder very happy. Other commentors like @militarydave35 applauded the plastic rear window's condition, noting its durability compared to glass, while also expressing interest in the car itself, highlighting it as a fun ride.
Neutral: @Bgg (The Seller) took time to respond to questions, explaining that there were multiple failed emission inspections before his ownership, but assured potential buyers that there are no engine problems currently. He also clarified that the car has cruise control and that the original audio system is included. However, there were concerns raised by @Foxsaysgo about the reasons behind the failed inspections and by @DJP1124 regarding rust around the toolkit area, which @Bgg addressed by stating it was due to a broken trunk lid gasket that allowed water in.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the car's overall condition, especially by commentors like @DJP1124, who inquired about the rust in the tool kit area, and @jbbush, who pointed out the likelihood of water damage due to the failed trunk lid gasket. @militarydave35 asked about the hardtop's condition, particularly if there were any rips or holes, while @MontanaGuy noted a switch issue that seemed improperly seated. Despite @Bgg's assurances about the car's cleaned condition, there were lingering questions about the vehicle's historical issues and potential risks from rust and mold.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a lot of enthusiasm for the 1963 Triumph TR3B, with @yorkag and @augopher both referring to it as a gorgeous and beautiful car, suggesting it's enjoyable to drive. @LewisSainous adds that the restoration is neatly done with fun features like the rear occasional seat and seat belts, highlighting the rarity of the model as only 2804 were built. @Tobyallen emphasizes how well it has been restored, noting the beautifully fitting convertible top and praising the car's original driving experience, encouraging potential buyers to enjoy driving it rather than keeping it as a static display.
Neutral: Several commenters provided insights on specifics about the car's engine and historical context. @Daimler250 points out that while the car is beautiful, it is missing the larger 'B' engine typically associated with the model, which @brakeservo and @Tobyallen agree is a drawback. @denismoi and @NotInTheRain discuss production discrepancies, engine history, and the presence of an A-type overdrive in the vehicle. Despite these details, the general consensus leans towards appreciation for what the car represents, and multiple users acknowledge its fun driving experience.
Negative: On the negative side, a few comments raise concerns about the car's modifications and label it as lacking in originality. @Tobyallen notes that many aspects, such as engine displacement and interior trim, differ from the original specifications, suggesting that while it is a fantastic car, it might not satisfy purists looking for exact authenticity. @JeffLemon and @ChiefMike express curiosity and concerns about certain components like the oil pressure and the absence of a stock engine, pointing out potential issues with reliability and performance expectations. @P_R_L adds to these concerns concerning the common manufacturing flaws associated with the clutch master cylinder, further highlighting the ongoing maintenance needs of classic cars.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, noting its aesthetic appeal and historical significance. @psg559 called it a 'Pretty car', while @jimmytheirishman referred to it as a 'time capsule'. @billyblyth highlighted it as 'the very definition of “Super Car” in 1953!', praising its vintage charm. Commenters like @Knuckles-R-Busted described the vehicle's silver paint and organic beauty, emphasizing its unique design. The seller, @shultz, assured that the car runs beautifully and described it as pristine. Additionally, @etypejaguarxk120se appreciated the vehicle's door sills and hinges, indicating no signs of poor repairs, which further contributed to positive perceptions of the car.
Neutral: A number of comments sought clarification and more information regarding the vehicle's specifics. @ColumbiaMotorAlley asked about the heritage certificate and requested additional details, including running videos and mechanical conditions. @wtnh requested confirmation on matching numbers due to limitations in the provided photos. @Mmayerla expressed a need for more information on the mechanical condition of the car, questioning whether it runs well. There were also inquiries about the presence of side curtains and other detailed inspection items, showing general interest but also a need for more assurance and evidence, indicating a cautious but interested perspective among commenters.
Negative: Concerns arose regarding the lack of detailed photographic evidence and mechanical information. @neveradullmoment noted the absence of driving videos and stressed the need for more comprehensive documentation, which contributes to an overall sense of unease about the car's value. @Cabaron echoed this sentiment, suggesting that a professional photographer and more visual content could significantly improve buyer confidence. Additionally, @ColumbiaMotorAlley pointed out visible flaws such as a dent and potential issues regarding the rear springs. @Mmayerla's comment about the car potentially being a 'non-matching numbers driver' added to worries about its authenticity and overall worth. Overall, these comments reflect skepticism from some participants about the vehicle's pricing and presentation.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @SouthFL_02SS (The Seller) provided detailed information about the vehicle, assuring potential buyers that the dual zone climate control functions correctly and keeps the cabin cool even during the hot Miami summer. Additionally, the seller mentioned including the owner's manual, two keys, and even an OBDII Scanner as part of the sale, which enhances the value for buyers. The seller has shared underbody pictures, driving videos showcasing the vehicle's performance, and notes on the exhaust sound from the V8 engine, all of which suggest confidence in the car's condition and functionality.
Neutral: @Omni-1 inquired about the presence of an old connection for a Mercedes Benz Motorola flip phone, and @SouthFL_02SS (The Seller) promptly responded with information regarding the telecom connection located in the center console. The seller also mentioned the current tread on the front and rear tires, indicating consideration for the vehicle's maintenance and readiness for potential buyers.
Negative: There are no significant negative comments or concerns presented about the vehicle at this time. All inquiries and responses have been focused on providing clarifications and additional information, with no indications of issues or dissatisfaction noted.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Redscout shares nostalgic experiences with the MB Pagota, reminiscing about drives with his mother during winter snowstorms, suggesting a strong emotional connection to the vehicle. @Dollycat3 praises the SL's beauty, highlighting its wonderful color and beautiful interior, indicating admiration for the car's aesthetic. @GeorgeLyons, the seller, emphasizes the car's exceptional condition and history, including its care over the years and detailed maintenance records, underscoring its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: @GeorgeLyons notes that he will provide more details about the car later and indicates its availability for viewing in Erie, PA. @SFDuck raises a question regarding the color combination of the soft top and the interior, acknowledging that while the cosmetics are attractive, they may not match the original specifications, a sentiment supported by @TJClassic who shares his recollection of similar cars. @kickstartjoe suggests that it is not surprising if the soft top color has changed over such a long period, reflecting on the car's age.
Negative: Some concerns arise from @SFDuck and @seidelp about the potential non-original soft top color and the servicing of the injector pump, with @seidelp emphasizing the importance of proper maintenance to avoid engine damage. @GeorgeLyons responds to these concerns affirmatively, stating that although the soft top was changed, the rest of the interior remains original and that the dealership has a history of servicing the car, which should reassure potential buyers. Despite the few issues raised, @GeorgeLyons aims to alleviate concerns by confirming the car's readiness for enjoyment after years of care.
|
| |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is presented as a rare SilverStone NA Miata with only 66,000 miles and is described as being in fantastic condition. @Spotauto (The Seller) encourages potential buyers to reach out with questions and expresses optimism about the auction, highlighting the vehicle's appeal among Miata enthusiasts. @SDCR notes the car's originality and expresses confidence in its marketability, while @Bob_MX5 believes the history of the Miata should not deter potential bidders, particularly since the VIN stickers are all present, indicating original panels.
Neutral: @Spotauto (The Seller) acknowledges the concern about the driver's side fender and commits to verifying the location of the VIN plate. The seller has received inquiries about the vehicle, such as the age of the tires and the functionality of the AC system, to which he promptly responds, indicating the tire date and assuring that the AC blows cold. These responses are aimed at providing transparency regarding the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the missing VIN sticker on the driver’s side fender, which @SDCR argues suggests that the fender may have been replaced with an aftermarket part. This observation has led to debates about the vehicle's history and originality. @Bob_MX5 also pointed out that the initial photos lacked clarity about the VIN, prompting discussions on the importance of good documentation to avoid confusion during the auction.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a generally favorable impression of the 987 Boxster, highlighting its appealing features such as being a manual transmission vehicle, which adds to the driving enjoyment. @Euro_Classica, the seller, describes the car as 'really nice' and encourages potential buyers to reach out for viewings and test drives. Additionally, there is an acknowledgment of the car's robust IMS bearings, with @architect48 noting that this model year has updated bearings for improved reliability, which is a significant plus for prospective buyers.
Neutral: Several comments inquire about specific features and details of the vehicle, suggesting a clear interest in understanding its condition. @maharba01 asks about the IMS (Intermediate Shaft) bearings, while @needforzoom seeks information about the infotainment system. Concerns are raised about the aftermarket red and black interior trim, with @spokayman and @maximus_gear discussing whether these pieces can easily be swapped out and whether they affect the car's originality. @alepaiga brings up paint condition, prior maintenance, and operational questions regarding the top and keys, indicating the importance of transparency in such transactions.
Negative: There are also critical remarks regarding the vehicle's presentation and modifications. @slickshift points out that the seller should have removed certain aftermarket enhancements to cater to buyer preferences, while @maximus_gear even challenges the seller's claims of easy customization by commenting on the difficulty of swapping certain components. Moreover, some comments imply a lack of bidding activity may reflect buyer hesitancy due to the aforementioned aftermarket changes and the perceived quality of the vehicle, which ultimately raises concerns about the desirability of this 987 Boxster.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Daniel24444 (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm for the car, noting that it has been well-maintained and has a smooth-running engine with a recent oil change. The seller highlights that the car is a Southern California owned example and states their intent to sell due to a preference for an automatic transmission for commuting convenience. They also mention that the car carries an improved and larger IMS, reflecting confidence in its reliability.
Neutral: Several comments include inquiries regarding the lien process for the title transfer and earlier oil analytics, with @Mpty3 and @Rmos1 asking about the details. @Daniel24444 (The Seller) clarifies how the lien can be released and provides an estimated timeline for the title transfer. Potential buyers are also informed about the aesthetic features of the car, such as the tow hook and minor cosmetic wear on the rims, which has been described as surface level wear.
Negative: While the comments overall lean positively, there are some inquiries that suggest a concern for the vehicle's history and condition, such as @Rmos1's question about recent oil analytics and @Datzun's confusion regarding the tow hook as an aesthetic feature compared to tracking the vehicle. @saulrs1 comments on a detail in the car's photo, indicating that some viewers may find aspects of the vehicle questionable. Additionally, there is mention of minor rock chips on the front lip, which indicates natural wear and tear from age and use.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TylerPedee calls the vehicle "badass," indicating a strong appreciation for its appearance or overall vibe, suggesting that the Defender 90 has an appealing and rugged aesthetic that resonates with potential buyers or fans of off-road vehicles.
Neutral: @F97Comp, the seller, invites everyone to ask questions or express concerns about the 1997 Defender 90, demonstrating a willingness to engage with interested parties. The seller also offers to provide additional photos or videos, which suggests transparency and a proactive approach in the sales process.
Negative: There are currently no negative comments noted about the vehicle, which indicates a potentially favorable perception or lack of criticism from the commenters.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the car, highlighting its historical value and impressive condition. @Rockabillykid found it awesome to see, wishing good luck to the seller. @Jesuede was captivated by its beauty, while @GetGreg emphasized the importance of preserving such a legacy for future generations. Commenters like @GeneG and @Chrispc recognized the car's provenance, declaring it worthy of display in a museum, and appreciating its originality. Overall, the consensus was that it's a remarkable piece of automotive history.
Neutral: Some discussions centered around the vehicle's details, including the condition of its parts and historical accuracy. @markleftcoast and @martenni shared insights on the engine and chassis numbers, raising questions about their originality and matching components. @Socaljam, the seller, provided detailed information on the restoration and history of the car, clarifying the confusion over its VIN and engine number while acknowledging the incorrect front seats. Commenters like @58ghia sought additional information and photos to better understand the car's details, reflecting a general curiosity about its specifications.
Negative: Conversely, a few concerns were raised about the vehicle's authenticity and completeness. @mick59 noted discrepancies with the hood and missing bumper guards, while @rickstermachine questioned if the car had the proper 16" wheels. There was a discussion about the importance of accurate details, with @DFWcarandtoymuseum commenting on the difference between investors and enthusiasts, highlighting a potential disconnect regarding the car's presentation versus its actual condition. The seller acknowledged these concerns but maintained that the positives of the car, such as its history and restoration quality, outweigh any negatives.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @mlesko73 commended the vehicle as a lovely cruiser, emphasizing the appeal of the red boot complementing its design. They noted that while the car may need some clean-up, it possesses a charm that is sure to make its future owner very happy. @Hoppy18 expressed confidence in the seller's honesty and reliability, indicating a strong appreciation for the car based on its description and the seller's past comments. Additionally, @funkaholik highlighted the rarity of the intact smog pump, reiterating the significance of the car's originality and suggesting that any necessary updates to the vehicle should be minimal, only addressing crucial concerns.
Neutral: The seller, @PeachStateClassics, provided a detailed overview of the car's history, emphasizing its originality and previous ownership by a school teacher in California. They shared anecdotes about the original owner, Virginia, which added personal depth and a sense of care towards the vehicle's history. Comments from others, such as @corkynd and @CarFoolLane, pointed out technical aspects like the absence of turn signals in the hood and reminisced about similar classic cars from their past, noting both their fondness for the Mustang and their experiences with similar vehicles.
Negative: Concerns were raised about specific aspects of the car, such as potential issues with the rear window glass, as noted by @mlesko73, who pointed out that they would never have the top up. @corkynd questioned the lack of turn signals in the hood, implying a possible oversight in its original specifications. @Hoppy18 mentioned that the car pulls slightly to the left during braking, which could indicate a minor handling issue, albeit not a significant one, but it still raised potential concerns for prospective buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's appearance and condition. @jsa310 described the car as 'Gorgeous!', while @BossPapa expressed admiration for its beauty and remarked on how well it has been taken care of. @Ryan__W__S (The Seller) shared that the car was his grandfather's pride and joy and mentioned details such as new tires and routine maintenance, showcasing the effort put into keeping it in pristine condition. The seller’s personal anecdotes about the car’s history added a sentimental touch that many found appealing.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarifications about the car's mechanical and physical condition. @db_duvida asked about potential oil leaks and the car's storage history, while @Norsky644 inquired about the axle-back exhaust and expressed a preference for the chrome tips added at a muffler shop. @Buster020065 raised questions about the cold start procedure, TPMS sensors, and the potential for windshield or top issues, indicating a cautious approach by potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were also raised regarding specific issues with the vehicle. @Buster020065 specifically asked about warning messages from the TPMS sensors, describing a similar experience with a previous vehicle, and expressed worries regarding the seals on the windshield and top potentially being damaged. The fact that the seller mentioned issues with the TPMS sensors and not being able to replace some was a notable red flag for some observers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @mracla_hbca (The Seller) highlighted that the vehicle has been well-maintained, with no major services required aside from routine maintenance. They confirmed that everything functions perfectly and also stated the truck was garage kept and cared for very well, which seems to impress potential buyers. Additionally, several commenters like @Phil1776 and @Cabaum appreciated the truck's condition, noting it looks great and may be hard to resist despite their initial preference for a 4x4 vehicle.
Neutral: Commenters were curious about various aspects of the vehicle, including warranty information and general specifications. @newcarpro provided detailed vehicle specifications including the engine type and build information, showing a professional interest in the truck's details. @mracla_hbca responded positively to inquiries regarding the original keys and ownership of the vehicle, displaying a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns or unanswered questions. @Emeraldgreen66 inquired about possible damage from a sideswipe accident, specifically about the driver's side quarter panel, while @rscarff sought clarification on tire condition and any drivability issues related to the accident. These questions highlight potential buyers' caution regarding past incidents and the desire for more transparency about the vehicle's history.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a generally positive sentiment towards the vehicle being auctioned, particularly from @aSingh39, the seller, who emphasizes the car’s low mileage and overall excellent condition. Commenters like @RobE36 share personal experiences, noting their fondness for a similar BMW X5 they once owned, suggesting a strong appreciation for the model. Additionally, @aSingh39 reassures potential buyers that there are no accidents or serious mechanical issues, enhancing confidence in the vehicle's quality.
Neutral: Several neutral inquiries focus on specific details about the vehicle, such as the condition of the seats and the age of the tires. Commenters like @IMD and @CarLoverED seek clarification about wear and maintenance history, showcasing a common due diligence among potential buyers. Additionally, @EricRow raises questions about the presence of spots on the seat and requests tire codes, indicating a methodical approach to assessing the vehicle's value.
Negative: On the downside, some concerns have been raised, specifically regarding the visible spots on the passenger seat and the necessity of addressing recalls. Commenters like @E36m52 and @H0ld_Fast inquire about the status of recalls and specific vehicle parts, indicating potential apprehensions about the vehicle's maintenance history. Although @aSingh39 responds with reassurances, the existence of these questions may reflect a lack of complete transparency in some areas, highlighting the importance of thorough communication in the sale.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight the luxury and performance aspects of the Range Rover Sport being auctioned. @OwnGoalLM10, the seller, expresses enthusiasm about the vehicle, emphasizing its rarity and the fact that it has lived in Southern California its whole life. Potential bidders can appreciate that the vehicle is a non-smoker car, has minimal odors, and features such as a third-row seat, which @Quikshftn04s281 brings up as a super rare addition. The vehicle seems to be in good condition overall, with tires that have plenty of tread and buttons mostly in great shape according to @OwnGoalLM10.
Neutral: Several commenters engage with the seller to gain more information about the vehicle's condition. @Dpurpura asks for clarification regarding a reported damage on the Carfax report, seeking details about its nature and any repairs that were made. @OwnGoalLM10 responds to this inquiry, explaining that the damage was noted before their ownership and could stem from minor incidents, indicating a transparent communication approach. Other inquiries include questions about the presence of any warning lights or service indicators, with @Mattyj74 seeking reassurance that the vehicle is functioning well, to which the seller confirms there are no check engine lights.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's past damage as noted in the CarFax report. @Dpurpura expresses a desire for clarification on the specifics of this damage, indicating reservations about buying a vehicle with an unclear incident history. Another commenter, sharing their own experiences with a damaged vehicle, demonstrates that they are cautious and place high importance on the vehicle's condition before proceeding with potential interest in purchasing the Rover. This highlights an unease some potential buyers may feel regarding the car's past.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has garnered much praise for its excellent condition and aesthetics. Commenters like @Mayjer and @lloyddon1 (The Seller) highlighted its beautiful appearance, with @lloyddon1 (The Seller) stating that the Mini is 'absolutely fantastic' and a 'turnkey ready to go!!'. The car is noted for its low mileage, rare features like automatic transmission and cold AC, and its unique British racing green color. The seller's confidence in the car's quality is reflected in multiple mentions of its pristine condition and the assurance of buyers having a pleasurable experience. The inclusion of documentation and the offer for potential buyers to inspect the vehicle further enhance the car's appeal.
Neutral: Several inquiries have been made regarding the vehicle's specifications and features, highlighting the community's interest in understanding its technical aspects. Commenters like @mad_max99 and @mgbnut1973 raised questions about the import paperwork and engine management system. @lloyddon1 (The Seller) was responsive and engaged, providing information about the car's compliance with emissions when imported from Japan and the existing engine management system. Additionally, there was discussion about the functioning of the vehicle's lights and the potential for modifications, indicating a diverse range of opinions among interested buyers.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism about the vehicle's automatic transmission and its impact on desirability. @Bill.H expressed that the automatic feature could be a drawback for many, while others discussed the appropriateness of wheel sizes, suggesting that some prefer a different aesthetic. Concerns about whether the vehicle would pass inspections in various regions have also been raised, with @ryopang questioning its suitability in New Jersey due to the OBD system. Overall, while the Mini is viewed positively, there are notable differences in preferences and concerns among potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Streeter recalls fond memories of the Cushman scooter from his time working at Six Flags over Texas in the 70s, praising its indestructibility despite heavy usage by teenagers. He notes that these scooters were reliable workhorses. @a410traveler agrees, reminiscing about their durability as well, sharing experiences from Disneyworld where similar scooters were used. @Warriors! adds to the nostalgia, mentioning their presence at a golf course and emphasizing the unique sound they produced, expressing appreciation for finding such a reliable vehicle.
Neutral: @wcso945 (The Seller) provides clarification on the vehicle's features, confirming its tough build and the maintenance it received from previous owners. They share that the Cushman was manufactured in Lincoln, NE, and highlight its status as a titled motorcycle, which could open possibilities for road use licensing. @Mouse51 poses questions about the vehicle's licensing potential and specifications, while others like @Ant5842 suggest its utility for swap meets or race events, keeping the conversation focused on the scooter's capabilities.
Negative: Comments from @Jumpdunk and @Ant5842 touch on concerns regarding the vehicle's top speed and previous damage. @Jumpdunk specifically asks for more details on the scooter's condition and how the damage occurred, implying concern over its readiness for use. @Ant5842 also humorously inquires about the A/C functionality, perhaps indicating some skepticism about the vehicle's completeness or fitness for modern use. Overall, the negativity seems to stem from uncertainty about the vehicle's repair needs and performance.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Choopie expressed enthusiasm for the Avalanche, wishing good luck to all bidders. @CRUSH remarked on the rarity of such vehicles, suggesting that this particular Avalanche is indeed a unique find. The seller, @PM_Terra, highlighted the impressive condition of the vehicle, emphasizing its rust-free status and low mileage, along with an accident-free and smoke-free history, which is appealing to potential buyers. The seller also welcomed potential bidders to inspect the vehicle in person and encouraged thorough review of the provided photos and videos to ensure transparency about the vehicle's state.
Neutral: Several comments addressed specific interests regarding the vehicle. @AreoCal requested a start-up and driving video, which @PM_Terra promptly provided. There were also discussions about the vehicle's technical aspects, where @tildon raised a question about flickering dashboard lights during the video, which @SchlickVonReitmann explained as a result of camera settings and LED technology interaction. These technical insights indicate that viewers are engaged and seeking clarity on the vehicle's features.
Negative: @GasTurbine raised a concern about potential bleached-out spots or residue on the plastic panels of the vehicle, pointing to images that might suggest such imperfections. @PM_Terra acknowledged this common issue with Avalanche models, admitting that while the vehicle does exhibit such characteristics, they are not as prominent in person as they appear in the photos. Despite these comments, the overall reception seems to lean towards optimism but with a note of caution regarding minor aesthetic flaws.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Enduroguy68 reminisces fondly about the iconic SL90, recalling how it impressed him as a child with its reliability and performance during his adventures. He expresses admiration for the bike's build quality, comparing it favorably against his own mini bike. In a similar vein, @Mercury_Man highlights the potential of the vehicle, noting that it can serve as either an excellent restoration project or a durable rider. He points out the bike's rarity, suggesting it deserves a dedicated new owner who appreciates it as much as he does, reinforcing that the model holds significant nostalgic value to many.
Neutral: @drailer shares a practical observation about the bike, mentioning the common issue with chain adjuster brackets breaking on the rear swingarm but emphasizes that this is a minor flaw compared to the bike's overall reliability. Meanwhile, @Babyp adds an additional perspective by discussing the adjustment bolts that can prevent such breakage if maintained properly, indicating some awareness of the vehicle's mechanics and upkeep.
Negative: In contrast, @Citabria98 shares a more personal narrative of disappointment related to motorcycles, highlighting how he felt left out as a kid without the chance to own a Honda CT70H due to parental restrictions. His story illustrates a sense of regret and humor about growing up without access to the bikes he longed for. While this comment doesn't directly criticize the SL90, it reflects a broader sentiment of longing for what could have been, showcasing the emotional weight these vehicles carry in their owners' lives.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MartyKC highlights the impressive longevity of the 307 engine, noting that it has lasted 86K miles without experiencing common cam problems. The sentiment is echoed by @ssterry, who praises the Malibu for its rare SS delete option, emphasizing its unique charm. @CarFoolLane adds to this by pointing out the factory A/C and distinctive build combination, suggesting that it carries features uncommon in other models due to the SS craze.
Neutral: @CarFoolLane also notes the original spare wheel and speculates about the vehicle's original features like full wheel covers and whitewall tires, which contribute to its classic appeal. @JayKay2430 brings humor to the conversation by mentioning the car's potential fate of being drastically modified in the future, asking how long the car might survive in its current form. This playfulness reflects an ongoing appreciation for the Chevelle's originality among enthusiasts.
Negative: On the other hand, there is an underlying concern about the car's preservation, as @JayKay2430 humorously questions whether it can remain untouched, hinting at the risk of it being altered for the sake of modern trends. @ssterry joins in on the joke about the Chevelle being at risk from the likes of Richard Rawlings, indicating a common fear of valuable classic cars being transformed indiscriminately. @Winbid62 adds a wistful note by mentioning that his LS5 engine will have to wait for a chassis, implying that not all enthusiasts are able to enjoy working on or restoring such vehicles.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed positive sentiments towards the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and nostalgic value. @FRANKIEgto praised the absence of aftermarket side moldings, which many find unattractive, while @PineIslandPorsche described it as an 'awesome ride' and a perfect candidate for restoration and enjoyment. The excitement surrounding the classic nature of the Cutlass and its potential to bring joy to its owner was a common theme in these comments.
Neutral: There were a few neutral comments regarding practical considerations for potential buyers. @rg69ho expressed an interest in seeing the car in person but noted difficulties in reaching out to the seller. @JB1971SX reminisced about owning a similar model in the past but highlighted the impracticality of purchasing the vehicle due to shipping costs across the country. Meanwhile, @atorres249, the seller, provided transparency by adding a third-party inspection to the listing and answering specific queries about the car's condition, addressing concerns from prospective buyers.
Negative: On the negative side, some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's condition. @droptopron pointed out issues with the trunk pan and asked for clarification regarding possible repainting. @Rocket-Head912 echoed these concerns, noting potential corrosion and urging for more detailed photographs of the trunk area to assess the extent of any damage. Additionally, @JB1971SX criticized the car's color choice, stating that a Cutlass should never be red, reflecting a mix of disappointment and personal preference.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and overall condition. @MCLeather showed eagerness, stating a desire for a 'super dad wagon', while @GetGreg called it a 'beautiful car' and remarked on the high interest from potential buyers. @pizzaman09 noted the presence of many new suspension components and praised the overall state of the car. The seller, @silverarrowcarsltd, also emphasized the excellent condition of the interior, describing it as 'fresh' and 'amazing'.
Neutral: Several comments focused on technical aspects and inquiries concerning the vehicle. @Fartparts expressed a disappointment emoji without elaboration, while @Becauseracecar asked about the car's power numbers, which @CajunSS provided by referencing the Alpina archives. The seller clarified various questions, including the condition of the headliner and registration status, confirming that the car is currently registered in Ohio and titled there. Requests for additional information, such as scans of receipts and details about the headlights, were made, showcasing clear interest in the car's provenance and features.
Negative: There were a few concerns raised regarding regulatory compliance and potential issues with registration. @GetGreg noted that there might be many inquiries about the car's California smog compliance, even when the listing stated it was not compliant. @RalphHinkley questioned whether the vehicle has the appropriate US Customs import paperwork to ensure it could be registered in a US state. These comments reflect some apprehension about the legalities surrounding the vehicle's registration and compliance, despite general enthusiasm for its condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The seller, @2x99qca, shared that the 2020 E63 S AMG has been well cared for, indicating it was bought new and has only been lightly used and garaged. They emphasized that the car has full-body PPF installed, along with ceramic coating, which keeps the exterior in prime condition. Additional inclusions in the sale such as two keys, original MBUSA gifts, and a custom Weathertech cover enhance its appeal. Overall, many commenters found the car visually stunning, with @BMWE90Guy stating it's the best looking E-Class ever made, while @Tigers196884 praised its appearance and noted that CarFax isn't always reliable.
Neutral: There was some concern raised by commenters regarding the CarFax report which indicated 'damage reported.' @APachon71RN inquired about the specific nature of the reported damage. @fwallen also noted that without clarity on the damage, it would be difficult to bid on the vehicle. The seller responded indicating that they were surprised by the report and would look into it. Additionally, @Mantismac questioned the service history of the vehicle, asking if any service records could be provided.
Negative: Despite the seller's reassurances, some commenters expressed skepticism about the vehicle's condition due to the CarFax report. @beau17 pointed out the lack of elaboration on the accident mentioned in the listing, while @fwallen insisted that the absence of further details on the damage prevented them from considering a bid. This lack of transparency could deter potential buyers who seek meticulous clarity regarding the vehicle's history.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @alfriedesq: Amazing machine, @dlasco: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥, @Akamai1: Macchina magnifica!!, @NK-minnesota: The original owner had excellent taste, @GeneralAI: The Ferrari 488 GTB is unmatched for gorgeous design and blistering supercar performance in the under $300K price point! @boaboyoz: An exquisite exemplary Englewood 488 GTB. Super stylish specimen. Very cool – GLWTA!
Neutral: @BlueChipServices (The Seller): Hi Everyone, Welcome to another auction from Blue Chip Services, we are excited to present this one-off example. As always we more than welcome any Pre Purchase Inspection, please reach out to us directly to schedule. Keep in mind this is a RESERVE auction but we are looking to close. Best of luck! @Steve27t: Can you make a clear picture of the specification plate. Thanks. @Kash4cash: Does the car have front suspension lift? @BlueChipServices (The Seller): This example does not have suspension lift. @BlueChipServices (The Seller): Here is a video. Thank you for all of the kind words!
Negative: @Krabnevir: 😳 No specific criticisms were offered, but the emoji might suggest surprise or concern. Overall, there were no overtly negative remarks about the vehicle beyond this reaction.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle for its aesthetic appeal and unique features. @PontiacNut called it a beauty, commenting on the stunning copper color, while @Mike_Breinin highlighted the right options, such as the 455 HO, M-22 transmission, and Safe-T-Track. The original factory paint and the car's condition were also appreciated, with @lardog007 describing it as an incredible survivor and mentioning the gleaming paint that does not translate well in photographs. @TheJudge reminisced about the car's history and noted its innovative design, memory of owning it, and its impressive paperwork.
Neutral: Comments from the seller, @Mrcalgto, included detailed information about the car's history, options, and previous owners. He explained the rarity of the vehicle, stating only 374 Judges were built in 1971, and detailed the various restorations and modifications done over the years. @knuckles-r-busted expressed interest in the unique features, noting his unfamiliarity with the Honeycomb wheels. Discussions also centered on the car’s brakes, with @bouncefactor and @carfoollane commenting on the common practice of using drum brakes in performance builds at the time, acknowledging that it might seem odd today but was not uncommon back in the day.
Negative: Criticism was directed towards some aspects of the vehicle, particularly around its features and options. @mrr expressed surprise at the non-power front drum brakes, which some found puzzling for a car of this caliber. @bkrug inquired why previous owners had etched the VIN on the windows, indicating that this practice was uncommon and sparked curiosity about its implications. Overall, while the car received much admiration, some questioned the decision-making behind its configuration.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its solid history and well-maintained condition. @FlatWorld23 and @CollectorCarsChicago both shared positive experiences as previous owners, mentioning how well the car was taken care of and its enjoyable driving performance. @Mageez and @458s praised the E36 M3's engineering, power, and handling capabilities, emphasizing that it's a great option for both tracking and driving on regular roads. Furthermore, the seller @rmwcali provided reassurance about the car's features, including the condition of the AC and the upgrades applied, enhancing the car's desirability.
Neutral: The comments also included inquiries about specific details regarding the car's functionality and modifications. @Cory_M wanted to know about smog compliance and the AC function, while @URW asked about the suspension setup. The seller provided thorough answers to many of these questions, confirming the AC's icy cold output and the car's readiness for California smog. Notably, the seller indicated that the vehicle comes with additional parts and offered to provide photos to further clarify modifications, while also addressing concerns about the car's mileage history raised by commenters, such as @speedwerx and @bmg1racing, who sought greater transparency about the Carfax reports.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by commenters about the car's track readiness and the lack of certain essential modifications. @mlytle pointed out the potential inadequacy of the all-season tires for track use, and others like @kyler1165 requested a detailed list of modifications that seemed missing from the ad. @sienayr pressed for more information on the car's suspension and reinforcement modifications, explicitly noting the importance of these factors for long-term usage in track environments. Certain comments showed skepticism regarding the car's title issues and its track readiness, which left some potential buyers uncertain about the vehicle's condition and whether it met the necessary standards for serious track use.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Craven described the vehicle as "the best face on a Subaru ever," indicating a strong aesthetic appreciation. @Blakeman185 expressed regret over selling a similar model and enthusiasm by saying, "Beautiful…. I regret selling mine on here a few months ago! Will be watching this one!" Additionally, @Jack7Black complimented the overall presentation by stating, "Nicely Done there," further reflecting positive sentiments surrounding the vehicle.
Neutral: @Adirondack inquired about the timing of the undercoating, showing interest in the maintenance of the vehicle. @jstoner420 asked about the car's current location, suggesting a desire for more information. @MrT1970 requested a driving video to demonstrate the car's capabilities, while also reminiscing about his previous ownership experience with a similar model. @Eli93 also requested a driving video for further insight into the car's performance.
Negative: @Boosted360 raised concerns regarding a potential rattle heard in a RPM clip and asked for verification on whether the car smokes or leaks oil, signaling skepticism about some of the vehicle's mechanical reliability. This sentiment could indicate apprehension about the vehicle's overall condition as well as the need for additional transparency from the seller.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The car is widely regarded as timeless and beautiful, with comments such as @seamanseye stating, "Timeless, beautiful car." @carsrmylife mentions that it looks like a nice driver, suggesting that it could perform well as a functional vehicle. Additionally, @longhorizon shares positive personal experiences owning a similar model, emphasizing its reliability and the successful resolution of potential balance shaft issues, which reassures interested buyers about the car's condition.
Neutral: Various commenters are looking for clarity regarding specific details about the vehicle, particularly the balance shaft issue raised by @psd132002. @longhorizon addresses this concern by explaining the ambiguity about the balance shaft issue and shares that it was resolved for many vehicles during the 2007 model year, referencing his own experience with a high-mileage vehicle. @mlowengrub further supports this by providing engine number details that show this car's engine falls outside the range of those affected by the balance shaft defect, which makes it likely to be in good condition.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the condition of the vehicle, particularly regarding its exterior and the tires. @blkdgbreton questions the fender outline alignment with the headlight, hinting at possible damage, and @ctt inquires about the repairability of damaged rear seat front pockets. Moreover, @carsrmylife expresses disappointment over the choice of inexpensive tires, indicating a preference for higher-quality brands like Continental or Michelin, which could affect the car's overall perception during bidding.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments indicate a strong appreciation for the vehicle, emphasizing its charm and functionality. @boaboyoz described it as a 'wonderful W463 300GE, beautiful & bad a$ in black', indicating that the aesthetic and overall appeal of the car are highly valued. Moreover, @Wob (The Seller) enthusiastically discussed the vehicle's performance and comfort, stating it's an enjoyable drive, especially in automatic form, and highlighted its readiness for long-term use, adding a personal touch by mentioning its previous care from a renowned figure.
Neutral: There were numerous inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition and specifications. @jeffrey13 asked about the original importation details, while @RJAPPRAISE questioned whether it was manufactured to meet US emission standards. @Mido and @chicashflow requested specifics about the undercarriage and any potential rust issues, indicating a desire for thorough information that prospective buyers need to make informed decisions. @Wob (The Seller) responded positively, referencing the car's solid state and willingness to provide further details as requested.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about the vehicle, particularly regarding compliance with California regulations. @AnonUserBTyqq expressed apprehension about the lack of a California smog certificate, essential for legality in that state, and @jacquesdeV asked about the absence of A/C, indicating dissatisfaction with the vehicle's climate control features that are often expected in modern cars. @tightbox confirmed that the truck lacks A/C from the factory, which might deter some buyers looking for comfort in extreme weather.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @tterrag exclaimed that the car is 'beyond beautiful,' while @Embee64 called dibs on the pristine color of the vehicle. @alfriedesq echoed this sentiment by describing it as stunning. Enthusiasts like @Bartlola expressed that they wouldn't change a thing about the car, finding it visually awesome, and @truthseeker declared it to be their favorite 911 at the Shop Club Seattle. Several commenters praised the quality of the build and its impressive specifications, with @shopclubsautogroup (The Seller) detailing the vehicle's features and confirming its cult status, referring to it as 'The KING,' which garners admiration from visitors.
Neutral: Comments varied on practical matters such as whether the vehicle's rear license plate could be mounted, which @theiii raised in response to concerns about legality while driving. @shopclubsautogroup (The Seller) confirmed that while a dealer plate was used, a permanent solution would require modifications. There were inquiries about the car's horsepower numbers, its original transmission, and whether a build sheet was available. Questions about the vehicle's registration in different states, such as California, also surfaced but the seller was not able to provide definitive answers on some queries.
Negative: On the flip side, there were some concerns regarding the car being a potential 'show car' rather than practical for daily driving, noted by commenters like @Jockr. @theiii expressed frustration over the inadequacy of responses to his legitimate questions about the car’s modifications, suggesting that the seller's attitude seemed dismissive. The lack of air conditioning and heating was also mentioned by @kkherman, which some might see as drawbacks. Others expressed worries that the car's unique customizations could complicate its usability as a regular driver, given the specific regional regulations for license plates.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors such as @fmo786 and @BESCFAN praised the vehicle's aesthetic, calling it a "real looker" and highlighting its "perfect sports car lines". @whipcity76 expressed delight in seeing another 328, noting its great mileage of 42K and its reliability, claiming the car could bring countless smiles. @forza_motorsports, the seller, also emphasized the vehicle's good condition, particularly the paint and the original leather interior, stating that repainting it would be unnecessary. Additionally, the comment from @read33 confirmed the car's reliability, having owned his 328 for over a decade with no service issues, suggesting these cars are easy to maintain.
Neutral: Multiple comments offered neutral perspectives on the vehicle's condition and needed repairs. @Jprgh inquired about missing components, and @HeyDoc pointed out potential expenses for service, including tires and hoses. There were concerns raised about parts availability, particularly regarding the brake system and oil pan, mentioned by @AutoFanaticNY, who provided a detailed overview of parts challenges for these vintage models. However, some felt that with proper care, these vehicles are still very enjoyable, with @Handsofstone suggesting cleaning the interior instead of replacing it, and others appreciating the car's character even with its imperfections.
Negative: The comments did not shy away from addressing potential negatives of the vehicle. @Kingkitesurf and @HeyDoc indicated that significant repairs might cost between $5,000 and $15,000, which could be a deterrent for potential buyers. @forza_motorsports, the seller, admitted that the vehicle would need a major service to ensure long-term reliability, which raises concerns about the immediate value. Furthermore, @Handsofstone noted that while he admires the car, the need to address the hard pedal situation and other repairs would mean additional work for any buyer, highlighting a blend of nostalgia and caution surrounding the car's history and required maintenance.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many enthusiasts have enthusiastically commented on the 2008 Porsche 911 Turbo-Tiptronic cabriolet, highlighting its stunning Guards Red color and luxurious sand beige interior. @alfriedesq stated that while the car has the wrong transmission for performance fans, @CinemExpert praised the TurboTips as stunning vehicles that should not be overlooked. Owners like @oldcargeezer and @cloud-dude share their excitement about similar models, with @lowfathustle recommending the turbo coupe for its impressive speed and enjoyable driving experience. The overall sentiment showcases a strong appreciation for the turbo lineup's blend of modern comforts and classic driving appeal.
Neutral: The comments also reflect a pragmatic view of the vehicle's condition and features. @reformedwallstreeter and @izzodesh raised important questions about whether the coolant lines had been dealt with and the absence of paint protection film. These inquiries indicate that potential buyers are considering both the aesthetic and mechanical aspects of the car. @Jimlerbs (The Seller) responded clearly, emphasizing that the vehicle has only 13,000 miles and no track use, which is a significant point for low-mileage car enthusiasts. He reassured potential buyers by explaining the rarity of proactive maintenance on low-mileage vehicles, which adds to their appeal.
Negative: However, not all comments were purely positive, as there were some concerns regarding the car's automatic transmission. @ThrasherBear humorously suggested that if one is looking for an automatic convertible, a Boxster might be a better fit, implying that the performance attributes of this Turbo model could be underappreciated due to its transmission choice. Furthermore, @izzodesh's questioning about the coolant lines and their maintenance reflects a potential worry among buyers regarding the car's long-term reliability, particularly given the known issues with coolant lines in older models. These mixed feelings hint at the intricacies of owning a performance vehicle and the expectations attached to their upkeep.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the vehicle's original condition and overall aesthetic. @Wob, the seller, highlights the car's stunning originality, noting it has a rich history and has been well-cared for, having been owned by an elderly woman from new. @Apathyfern expresses a positive view, suggesting the car is ready for a new owner to enjoy or modify. Others like @VWTony and @Braukuche agree that it should be considered more of a survivor than a project car, appreciating the original components and minimal alterations.
Neutral: Comments indicate uncertainty regarding the car's classification as a project. @Meercat pointed out various potential issues such as rust and aged parts, raising questions about what the car truly needs. Additionally, @kingkarmann is curious about the mileage verification and the potential for restoration, suggesting that further information from the seller would clarify the vehicle's status. Commenters seem generally open to the idea that some improvements may be needed while valuing the car's inherent qualities.
Negative: Skepticism arises around the need for the car to be labeled a project due to its condition. @Valkyrja and @Apathyfern question whether the lack of glass in the mirror warranted the project classification. @Meercat's comments on the visible imperfections and age of the engine parts raise concerns over the reliability of the vehicle as is. @kingkarmann also criticizes the mileage claim, suggesting it may not reflect the car's true wear and history, advocating for more transparency regarding the vehicle's maintenance and condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @JGreenland commented on the vehicle's appearance, calling it a nice looking car, while @LetMe_ThatPoint praised its handsome styling updates. @TimUrs6Avant expressed appreciation for the green color of the car, indicating his personal taste.
Neutral: The seller, @rkirilin81, provided information about the vehicle's bumper material, confirming it is plastic and noting its thickness and solidity. @TimUrs6Avant also raised questions about the front bumper's brand, past work/invoice history, and the reason for selling the car quickly. The seller clarified that the car would come with certain items and mentioned needing funds for another project, stating that the invoice reflects work done on the vehicle.
Negative: @Kingofthering pointed out that the asking price seemed high and expressed concerns regarding the expensive maintenance associated with Audis. @TimUrs6Avant also noted discrepancies in the vehicle's listing regarding the wheels, stating they are mono-block rather than multi-piece, raising potential issues about the seller's representations.
|
Original-Owner Supercharged 2013 Toyota Tacoma TRD Off-Road Double Cab V6 4×4 6-Speed
5TFLU4ENXDX083415
Lot 199648
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Josh0351 shared that the vehicle has been well-maintained and was never abused, corresponding with its history as a daily driver and mountain rig. He mentioned that the supercharger was professionally installed by a trusted mechanic and has not needed any independent service since its installation in 2016. Additionally, regular oil changes with Mobile 1 fully synthetic oil and Toyota OEM filters have been performed at 5,000-mile intervals, indicating a thorough and conscientious care for the vehicle's maintenance.
Neutral: The comments from potential buyers indicate a mix of inquiries about the vehicle's condition and maintenance records, with @Jkitchin and @EverestWC asking for specific details regarding motor testing and supercharger service history. @vocho noted a concern about the vehicle's smog compliance in California, while @GMNAO reached out for more basic questions, suggesting that there is some interest but also uncertainty about the vehicle's operational status.
Negative: One concern raised in the comments highlighted the vehicle's compliance with California emissions standards, noting that it may not pass smog tests due to the installation of the supercharger. @vocho expressed disappointment over this issue, which could deter potential buyers in that region. Additionally, @lucky12345678910 questioned the mileage put on the vehicle in the last year, suggesting a lack of usage that might imply potential concerns about its current state and reliability.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic and features. @99Redcobra praises the Raptor as a beautiful vehicle in their favorite color. @WichitaBronco echoes this sentiment, noting the great color of the Raptor, which adds to its appeal. The color is frequently highlighted as a standout aspect, contributing to the vehicle's overall desirability. Additionally, @Gordonclemons (The Seller) provides clear and reassuring information regarding the warranty status, which boosts confidence for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about the vehicle's specifications and warranty implications. @ContSp68 starts a discussion on warranty concerns related to tuning, and @Gordonclemons (The Seller) clarifies that a tune does not void the warranty due to the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. @WichitaBronco requests the vehicle's height for garage fitting purposes, and @Gordonclemons offers to provide measurements. The ordering and production details shared by @newcarpro showcase the vehicle's technical aspects without expressing strong opinions.
Negative: There are concerns about warranty issues among commenters, with @Deen001 pointing out that while tuning does not officially void warranties, it might complicate claims for repairs, especially relating to the powertrain. This could create hesitance among potential buyers regarding modifications and warranty acceptance. Overall, while admiration for the vehicle is strong, these warranty discussions introduce doubts about ownership experiences, especially related to aftermarket modifications.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Blizzard340: So nice! @GLWA: Beautiful Bike! @WKC: Nice! I’ll be involved in the bidding. @onlyhonda4me: Cool bike and a great Honda find. @Lucahemi (The Seller): This bike truly is a time capsule. It runs and rides beautifully and would look really great in a finished garage on display.
Neutral: @Mitziebikes: @WKC it says in the description of the bike that there are cracks in both side covers that were repaired by the previous owner. @Lucahemi (The Seller): The previous owner did a good job using a fiberglass repair kit to remedy this. Structurally they are as good as new but the crack is still visible from the exterior.
Negative: @WKC: In photo 29, is that a crack in the side cover? @WKC: My apologies to the owner and all. I should have inspected it more thoroughly before posting. @Lucahemi (The Seller): The headlight bucket is also cracked on both sides.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @buttesilverbow describes the vehicle as a stunner, particularly praising its blue color and wishing luck to the seller. @jxb comments on the ride's practicality, noting the functionality of the two saddle tanks for long-distance travel, which contributes positively to its appeal. @Todd_Z. appreciates the aesthetic, recalling fond memories associated with a similar color and the Ford Alcoas that look great on this rig. @boaboyoz expresses excitement over the build of the truck, calling it a lovely Swiss Aqua F-250. @AnkurGT is impressed by the vehicle's beauty and expresses interest in the auction, further supporting its positive reception. @BaerBronco echoes this sentiment, complimenting both the color and the wheels of the Ford Bumpside.
Neutral: @Johnnyynwa seeks clarification about the tow package, acknowledging seeing the hitch but wanting confirmation about the full setup before he bids. @mccartyam's comment "PS?" seems to be an inquiry but lacks context to determine its exact meaning. @Olallaeddy shares a personal anecdote about his own truck, which is a 2-wheel drive model, mentioning its reliability and long-distance capacity without directly assessing the vehicle in question.
Negative: @americanprideclassics (The Seller) addresses @Johnnyynwa's query, indicating uncertainty about the tow package, mentioning that it has a hitch and a trailer plug but is unsure if it is fully operational. This comment may raise concerns for potential buyers about the completeness and functionality of the vehicle's towing capabilities.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting its camp equipment functionality, with @Uvancndil confirming that the fridge, sink, and propane stove work properly. @AliceAustin complimented the distinctive center post lift feature, calling the bus "Nice." Additionally, @Uvancndil offered to arrange a personal viewing and test drive for @mperrone, indicating a willingness to engage with interested buyers.
Neutral: @Uvancndil clarified the condition of the vehicle, stating that there are no tears in the camp equipment top and that the rust observed on the driver's side seam does not extend to the utility connections. When asked about the original motor, @Uvancndil confirmed its absence. Moreover, @AndyD58 requested photos without the bra covering the vehicle and inquired about the type of front bumper on the van, to which the seller indicated uncertainty regarding the front bumper but mentioned the van is in excellent operating condition.
Negative: There were specific concerns raised by various commenters regarding the physical appearance of the vehicle. @jammyauto requested additional photos showing the sides of the A-pillars without the bra, which could highlight any potential damage. Furthermore, @DFT was curious about whether the original motor was available, which @Uvancndil revealed it was not. The inquiry from @da-cat about a close-up of the Westfalia tag and the rarity of the camper reflected a cautious interest in the vehicle's history and authenticity.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @777iron (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a beautifully restored Jimmy with a reliable General Motors crate engine that has only 9,000 miles on it, emphasizing its strong mechanical condition and lack of rust. The truck showcases a significant investment in its aesthetics, featuring a thorough paint job costing $10,000, and meticulous interior restoration, including new carpet and Rhino lining. Overall, the seller expresses confidence in the truck’s quality and encourages active bidding, showcasing pride in the craftsmanship and love poured into the vehicle.
Neutral: There is some discussion among potential buyers regarding additional features, particularly the absence of air conditioning. @Ryandou1 inquires about the heating and cooling options, which leads @777iron (The Seller) to confirm the presence of heating and the ability to install an A/C system after the sale for an additional cost. @ToyBox1, with a valid point, mentions that Texans typically require A/C, further prompting the seller to provide information about the cost of adding Vintage Air, which can range from $1,200 to $4,000 depending on the system chosen.
Negative: While the vehicle has many positive attributes, some potential concerns arise including the lack of air conditioning, which is critical for some buyers, especially in warmer climates like Texas as pointed out by @ToyBox1. This aspect might deter a segment of prospective buyers who prioritize comfort. Additional costs for retrofitting A/C may also present a barrier to bidding, as it adds to the overall investment required for the vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @SingleClutch highlights the car's impressive features, noting it comes with a 6MT and no fake hood scoops, which he appreciates along with its ultra-low mileage and great color. @judgebumblebee reminisced about their own good experiences with a similar model, expressing confidence that whoever purchases this GTO will love it too. @TurboHorizon expressed excitement at seeing a super low mileage version available, anticipating the auction results, while @BigVos fondly recalled having owned a similar vehicle before, indicating a strong emotional connection with this type of car.
Neutral: @Gas5757 detailed the vehicle's history, mentioning that it was part of a larger collection of cars he is selling due to space constraints. He has provided documentation for the car, including the original window sticker and owner’s manual, which adds to its credibility as a well-maintained vehicle. Several comments discussed the quality of the GTO's mileage and condition, as @Habu2 mentioned previously owning a low mileage model, setting a comparative benchmark.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's paint job, with @Juniorss pointing out overspray on certain parts and questioning the quality of the paint work. @bxd76 backed up this observation, emphasizing that the visible flaws could be concerning. @jamcracker shared frustrations with video uploads related to the vehicle, indicating a lack of access to potentially valuable visual information. However, @TAjefe noted that repainting the bumper could simply be a standard maintenance issue, suggesting that while there are concerns, they may not significantly detract from the overall value.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight that the vehicle is being described as an "almost virgin car" by @boxheadrev, the Seller. This suggests that it has original miles and all stock and original parts, which can be appealing to collectors or enthusiasts looking for an unmodified example. Additionally, the interest shown by @Gregwilliams, who is seeking more information about the vehicle, indicates that there is genuine curiosity and potential interest in the car.
Neutral: Several comments are inquiries or ask for clarification, such as @Pav1010 questioning the presence of an A/C compressor, and @gt-6_mk3 commenting on the original emissions air pump. @Quadfinger's remark about the quick sale raises a neutral point about the seller's decision, while @Tool12Man expresses curiosity regarding the background of the last winner. @boxheadrev (The Seller) responds, indicating that the previous buyer's decision to decline the vehicle was due to unmet expectations, which provides context without laying blame or taking sides.
Negative: Some comments suggest concerns about the selling process or the past buyer's experience. @Tool12Man questions the circumstances surrounding the last buyer, and @Quadfinger's comment implies skepticism about the seller's reasons for selling after such a short period. Furthermore, the situation raises questions about the car's condition or desirability, particularly since @boxheadrev (The Seller) states that A/C was not included, which may disappoint some potential buyers who expect such features.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @iTod pointed out the incredibly low mileage at around 1100 miles per year, highlighting it as a remarkable score. @Clarkecars noted that the car is a definite looker, while @MrMagoo2 emphasized its luxurious preservation and beauty. @Ashman528 expressed a desire to own the vehicle, noting it reflects a stylish ride that requires proper maintenance. The seller, @PM_Terra, described the car as rust-free with a low mileage of 2001 for its age, presenting a standout condition and boasting an accident-free and smoke-free history that adds to its appeal. They also encouraged thorough reviews of the provided photos and videos for potential bidders’ confidence in the vehicle’s exceptional quality.
Neutral: There were some inquiries regarding specific issues on the car, such as @JMGO questioning the appearance of gaps in the cover on the passenger side. The seller responded by acknowledging the damaged rubber trim on the rear right window and assured that it does not affect its functionality. @RogerWhitehouse requested a video demonstration of the roof's operation and service records, to which @PM_Terra provided confirmation that the roof mechanism had been serviced by the previous owner. The seller also invited potential buyers to visit the dealership or get a third-party inspection in San Jose, CA, indicating a willingness to provide transparency concerning the vehicle’s condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the quality of certain cosmetic repairs during the car's refurbishment. @MULLINER2002 and @Celticcross criticized the poorly executed re-varnishing of the wood and questioned the reason behind the replacement of carpets with poorly finished leather borders. @PM_Terra attempted to clarify that the fading was likely due to the vehicle's previous environment in humid Florida, explaining that the perceived imperfections might not be as noticeable in person as they appeared in photographs.
|
|
|