Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vibrant color of the vehicle, specifically the Individual Verde Mantis paint. @Oneredspyder and @2FAM appreciate the boldness and uniqueness that it adds to the car, with @nmexmatt stating it's 'the most fun you'll ever have driving a big sedan.' The car is described as rare and noteworthy, with @chswires saying it's hard to forget and @Powerandart calling it a striking family tracker, while @ezxh2 notes it combines luxury with high speed, making it an eye-catching and exciting choice for enthusiasts.
Neutral: Comments from various users about the features, including inquiries about the extended warranty and service history, reveal an interest in the car's practicality. @JustTheDude asks about the warranty, which @2FAM confirms as transferable with remaining coverage, while @Peter_69 is curious about service updates. @GermanDoc and @2FAM discuss the car's advanced features, like the rear seat entertainment system and key fobs, reflecting an appreciation for its technology and luxury amenities. Although some comments question how well such a bright color works in everyday settings, the overall tone remains balanced.
Negative: Some users express concern about the car's bold color and public perception. @Cayenne6MT questions the need for such conspicuousness in a vehicle while @Metubajohn humorously points out the potential for constant attention from others. Comments like those from @sommeraaron reveal a preference for a different engine, suggesting disappointment with the choice of the N63 over the S63. Similarly, @ShineOn jokes about the color being like a model car, hinting at skepticism about its practicality. Overall, while the car garners excitement, there's a degree of hesitation regarding its extreme aesthetics.
 |
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the condition and appearance of the Ferrari 308 being auctioned. @Wob (The Seller) highlights its readiness for enjoyment with fresh seats and tires, complimenting its aesthetic appeal as a well-maintained classic car that showcases only minor signs of use over its 43 years. Many, like @XXX79, love the timeless allure of a red Ferrari, while @kmartinusa fondly reminisces about this iconic vehicle as a childhood dream car, praising its presence and nostalgic significance.
Neutral: There are inquiries about specific details related to the vehicle, such as @matteo_goretti questioning the appropriateness of the shifter, indicating possible mismatches with standard configurations. Other comments, like those from @caliche, seek clarification on past accidents, while @90Lotus asks about the timing belt replacement. @Wob (The Seller) addressed various concerns by explaining the car's history and current mechanical state, including recent maintenance and the reliability of the Carfax report for older vehicles. He also encourages potential bidders to engage with him for any queries, highlighting the auction process.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism about the vehicle's condition and modifications, with @AML1 expressing concern over the placement of tail lights which could suggest accident repairs. @Zelica challenges the timing belt maintenance record, implying that even recent changes might not assure diligent upkeep. @Dinodino brings up that the power output of this Ferrari might not be as impressive by modern standards, comparing it unfavorably to other European cars, which diminishes its allure as a performance vehicle. Furthermore, there are fun jabs made by various commenters regarding the 308's quirks, lacking some functionality compared to modern cars.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @RaceGP1 praised the car as the ultimate choice for driving enthusiasts and loved its specifications, appreciating its unique build that suits serious track conditions. @ClagMagnet expressed admiration for its appearance, especially in Racing Yellow, and highlighted that it would do well for northern climates without A/C. @dailydino noted the appealing low mileage and unique specs that make this GT4 a nostalgic investment, emphasizing its potential as a rare collectible.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions about the car's features and condition, including @Al_Cantara and @NikonJim inquiring about the peeling paint and the lack of a DME report. @911r (The Seller) addressed these concerns, clarifying that there are no paint issues and providing details about the maintenance history, while others such as @Mid-EngineEnthusiast shared thoughts on the configuration's purpose, discussing the necessity of A/C for practical use versus its weight implications.
Negative: @wintershade criticized the timing of the sale soon after applying full PPF and joked about potential dissatisfaction from the owner's spouse. Other commenters like @bend356 and @Tubeguy expressed skepticism about the peeling paint and questioned the condition given the car's usage history, pointing to a concerning lack of oil changes during its early years. @spyder2015 brought up whether the car’s heating was truly operational given its A/C delete, showcasing lingering doubts about maintaining comfort in hotter climates.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its modifications and overall beauty. @SupraFreak compliments the car's modifications, while @johnnunez29 notes its impressive market performance. Enthusiasts like @ErikSOlsen endorse the seller's passion and attention to detail, describing the car as in wonderful condition and well-sorted. The aesthetic appeal of the original stock wheels is also mentioned positively by @SlowNRusty and @Brent821, adding to the vehicle's charm. Overall, many remarks are enthusiastic, expressing good wishes and admiration for the Supra's quality.
Neutral: Several commenters seek specific information about the vehicle's modifications and history. @98SNAKEEATER inquires about the original transmission, leading to @seanpt's response about it being sold. @ekotysh asks for details about the transmission work and expresses interest in a driving video, while others like @cjasonvein and @ligzero seek clarification on the installation process and requests for documentation. There are mentions of shops involved in the vehicle's restoration, including BIG Motorsports and Kustom Koncepts, indicating ongoing discussions about the car's integrity and history.
Negative: A few comments raise questions and concerns regarding the vehicle's modifications that might affect its value and authenticity. @ckasonvein queries the impact of the transmission conversion kit on the car's worth, while @R_Craft expresses confusion over the inconsistencies in service records related to transmission replacement. Additionally, there's concern from @selfishmotives seeking recommendations for hatch rust repairs, implying a potential issue with the vehicle that could deter buyers. Overall, while most feedback is positive, some apprehensive comments hint at potential apprehensions regarding the car's past repairs and modifications.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @1600veloce (The Seller) has received praise for their thorough listings, detailing each vehicle with care and enthusiasm. Commenters like @DrScootay expressed admiration for the beautiful look of the 1966 Ford Galaxie 500, while @gregoryindiana echoed these sentiments by appreciating how the car looks, sounds, and performs. @boaboyoz called the build glorious and noted the car's aesthetic appeal, which resonated with many, highlighting the expertise that goes into each restoration by @1600veloce.
Neutral: Several comments focused on technical specifications and features of the 429-Powered 1966 Ford Galaxie 500, with @kevinckb6 and @BigFrank seeking information about the car's original engine and horsepower. @UscPhd97_ inquired about the rear window's material, which @1600veloce confirmed to be factory glass. Additionally, there were discussions about the vehicle's brakes and whether modifications like power brakes were necessary, indicating a blend of curiosity and practical consideration for potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the car's braking system, with @gregoryindiana and @Ukodonnell03 questioning the adequacy of four-wheel drum brakes paired with a powerful engine. @mtrctylarry expressed worries about the extent of corrosion in the trunk area, hinting at potential maintenance issues. The inquiries regarding the vehicle's history and condition show a sense of caution from some commenters, reflecting typical buyer apprehensions about vintage cars.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @fordomanic praises the Falcon as a great car, expressing a personal preference for it over Mustangs of the same era, while mentioning his own collection of classic Fords. @Ranchero65 provides a detailed decoding of the data plate, highlighting the Falcon's specifications, indicating the vehicle's well-documented history. @AldermanAuto (The Seller) emphasizes the vehicle's performance and the passion put into building it, noting that it is a great driver that attracts attention. Additionally, @boaboyoz and @yellowz51 compliment the car's quality and potential, with @yellowz51 wishing all bidders luck.
Neutral: @MGB6 inquires about a better driving video and requests tire date codes for more information on the vehicle's condition. @waynemoore615 asks about the history of Alderman Auto in relation to Alderman Ford, while @six-two62 raises multiple questions about the vehicle's restoration, such as insulation, glass alignment, and wiring. @FordNutt humorously reflects on the rising sale prices of classic cars, showing concern over how the auction world seems to cater to affluent buyers.
Negative: @Mrfiftynine expresses reservations about the numerous problems that seem to accompany restorations, suggesting that the car might not be suitable for heavy use despite its looks. @rocketjohnny comments negatively on the absence of a 4-speed transmission, indicating disappointment in that aspect of the vehicle. @AmsoilDJ criticizes the absence of air conditioning, questioning the practicality of a classic car without such features, echoing sentiments from @Fordnatic who shares concerns about the incomplete wiring during the rebuild and the necessity for further work.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @wetwillyskate (The Seller) expresses a deep appreciation for the E61, calling it his favorite petrol-powered vehicle. He describes it as super useful, analog, well-powered, and aesthetically appealing. He advocates for driving it as-is or modding it further, suggesting that it provides satisfaction in either scenario. He also humorously assures potential buyers that their kids will thank them for steering clear of minivans and crossovers, highlighting the vehicle's family-friendly nature. The seller shows readiness to engage with interested buyers and promises a driving video soon, which adds to the excitement around the auction.
Neutral: Several commentors inquire about specific modifications and maintenance history regarding the vehicle. @krazydog asks about the rear lowering method and wheel offsets, to which @wetwillyskate provides detailed explanations involving sensor adjustments and wheel specifications. @Lanigiro is curious about how to return the vehicle to stock height, and @wagonpower25 questions the status of the rear differential and potential throttle lag issues. The seller answers all queries earnestly, demonstrating transparency and willingness to assist potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns arise in the comments regarding the vehicle's past performance and maintenance. @Berettaguy wonders if the car has ever been tested on a dyno or drag strip, indicating a desire for performance validation. @jordan.evans questions the cleaning of the intake valves, suggesting apprehension about maintenance. Although @wetwillyskate addresses these concerns, he acknowledges issues like past throttle problems caused by a failing shaft, which may induce some uncertainty for potential buyers. Overall, while the car seems solid, the presence of these performance concerns could deter some bidders.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Moepoe praised the vehicle's appearance, noting the clean underside and rarity of the factory Ford mufflers. @HellcatNation described the Mustang notchback as a stunning car perfect for car shows, while @NVGT350 complimented the seller's collection and expressed interest in more vehicles. @Thomasbut73 (The Seller) provided extensive information about the car, including its impressive engine performance and original condition, adding that the wheels were professionally powder coated and the car has working AC and heat. @CBar5 fondly recounted the vehicle's role in law enforcement and its impact on drivers in the past.
Neutral: Several comments engaged in discussions about the vehicle's service history and documentation. @Dturn76 inquired about the state livery's decals versus paint, while @fishdoc asked about the presence of buck tags. @UP4014 and @Stuartstruck raised questions about smog regulations, focusing on the vehicle's eligibility for registration in different states. @dcpropulsion contributed knowledge about the vehicle's delivery code and shared insights on the SSP market, remarking on the community's recognition of these cars.
Negative: @Sparrownaut expressed nostalgia about the vehicle's speed, hinting at difficult memories from the past. @Jcbsat raised a concern regarding the potential for being pulled over due to the car's police livery, questioning if it could be perceived as impersonating an officer. @MB1 questioned the installation of the fuel filter, suggesting it might be incorrectly plumbed. Overall, these comments reflect some apprehensions about the car's usability and legality given its history.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BusterBeaver highlights that the GT 40 Upper intake has significant value, and @boaboyoz describes the Bronco as a "rambunctious red" with a tasty build. @Hunter1969 praises the beauty of the Bronco and finds it drives straight at higher speeds, while @stevenbrooten appreciates the clean rebuild and expresses interest in seeing more details like the hardtop. Overall, there is an admiration for its aesthetics and build quality, with several commenters wishing the seller good luck with the sale.
Neutral: @Elevator (The Seller) confirmed that the vehicle is titled as a 1968 Bronco, responding to inquiries about its age and the VIN clarification. The seller has also added images and a video of the Bronco, indicating efforts to keep potential buyers informed while addressing various concerns regarding the vehicle's functionality and specifications. Comments from users like @Todd_Z note the quality of parts used in the rebuild, while other questions revolve around specifics like the gear ratio and whether it will pass emissions testing in California.
Negative: Some comments express concern about the vehicle's readiness for various regulations or driving conditions. @Wesley1963 questions the absence of windshield wipers, suggesting it may not be suited for all weather. @Micks41 notes the lack of a driving video would hinder potential bidders' assessment of the vehicle's value. There are also questions regarding the assigned VIN from Oregon and its potential implications for emissions, reflective of some uncertainty about the vehicle's registration history.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic and performance features. @GECONN praised the color combination as one of the best, while @boaboyoz called it a 'sexy beast' with an amazing build. The design aspect was acknowledged by @RaceGP1, who noted the 'absolute perfection' in styling with the classic Guards Red color and the Weissach package, indicating a strong appreciation for the car's visual appeal. Commenters like @theforce88 reiterated their thoughts on its beauty and wished the upcoming owner happiness with the car. Moreover, @cheezboy shared his personal experience, stating that the GT2RS offers the biggest bang for the buck compared to other 911 models, marking it as his favorite Porsche ever owned.
Neutral: Several comments provided useful information about the vehicle without expressing strong opinions. @HKMotorcars, the seller, elaborated on the car’s features, including its mileage of just 2,800 and full PPF coverage, and also shared specific details regarding the MSRP evolution, which was confirmed to be $399,995. Information concerning its driving history was also clarified; @HKMotorcars assured that under its current ownership, the vehicle was not driven on salted roads or during inclement weather. Additionally, commenters like @Iamjames and @SelectiveChoice inquired about the original window sticker and options offered with the car, showing interest in understanding its value further without leaning towards a positive or negative stance on the purchase.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the pricing and desirability of the GT2RS compared to other models. @mitchell996 speculated that the MSRP figures might be quoted in CAD instead of USD, leading to some confusion regarding the vehicle's true market value. Commenters, including @porsche1986, discussed why the GT2RS is less popular than the GT3RS, attributing it to the price premium and the horsepower difference, suggesting this could be a deterrent for buyers not focused on high-performance specifications. Additionally, @VegasJeff made a humorous remark about the potential trouble from driving such a powerful car in a residential area, implying that its performance might be excessive for regular roads.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express their admiration for the vehicle, labeling it as 'stunning' and 'absolutely breathtaking.' @CarNut72 describes the car as 'Stunning!!,' while @barrymanko1 calls it 'insane' and 'magic.' The color, Porsche Racing Green Metallic, receives much praise, with @boaboyoz emphasizing its beauty and uniqueness. Several users, including @GrodCharles and @jcohen03, remark on the impressive bidding already reaching $700k, showing enthusiasm for the car's desirability and potential value. @Wob, the seller, emphasizes the car's iconic status "the wolf in sheep’s clothing," and highlights its rarity, particularly its Paint to Sample feature, enhancing the overall allure of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments provide logistical insights and raise questions about purchasing and bidding. @Chi_PT queries about the resale rules of S/T models, while @Vtec4ever muses about the car's future ownership and driving frequency. @Leica356 and @ZS1 engage in discussions around the vehicle's historical value and market position, with ZS1 giving an overview of PTS examples globally, yet acknowledging the differences in availability in the market. @ABQHokie also contributes to the tariff discussion regarding the vehicle's importation from Canada, reflecting the mixed educational aspect of the comments.
Negative: On the downside, some individuals express skepticism or criticism regarding the vehicle's pricing and desirability. @Jeffmeyer finds the situation 'absolutely ridiculous,' and @PolzD remarks on the astonishment of someone paying such a high price for a 911. Comments suggesting that the car may not be driven much, like @Vtec4ever's concern, point to a perceived disconnect between the car's purpose and its collector status. @Ghosty and others share flagged comments that detract from the constructive dialogue, indicating a divide in opinions about the vehicle's value and purpose.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, noting it as a clean example and one of their favorites. @Quadfinger remarked that it was a wall poster car for him, while @VR-4ever praised its color and aging. @Fauxshowpony also showed interest in the car, stating it was too clean to modify. @westcoastcars highlighted the unique attributes of this model, emphasizing its adjustable spoilers and overall value compared to other cars in the segment. Furthermore, the seller, @Yamahadave, took time to reassure potential bidders about the car's condition, mentioning the recent service it underwent and addressing specific queries with enthusiasm, such as the removable glass roof.
Neutral: Questions from the community primarily revolved around functional aspects, including the radio's performance and features like the sunshade insert for the glass roof. @ttadriver inquired about driving videos and vibrations, while @Jocko315 asked about the aero functionality. @BenTX and @GSX1998 both sought clarity on the car's paint history and sound system issues, respectively. The seller, @Yamahadave, provided detailed responses regarding these concerns, including observations about the amplifier and previous modifications. He acknowledged the uncertainty surrounding the badge removal and mentioned plans to order a paint meter for verification, demonstrating a willingness to ensure transparency.
Negative: Concerning the vehicle's issues, several commenters pointed out potential concerns that could affect functionality. @ttadriver and @JayVan03 raised questions about drive vibrations and rattling sounds, while @car-ramrod asked about the A/C and heating issues. The state of the audio system was also a common topic, with @GSX1998 suggesting it could be a wiring issue. @Yamahadave acknowledged various concerns but clarified that he hadn't felt any significant vibrations himself; however, he admitted that the stereo had lost power during upholstery work, which raised doubts. Additionally, he noted the paint meter's limitations, causing further scrutiny about the vehicle's exterior condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the remarkable condition and rarity of the 2014 Toyota FJ Cruiser being auctioned. @sultan68 called it a "unicorn," indicating its unique value, while @NWFJGUY simply exclaimed, "Amazing!" Several comments speculated about the potential of this vehicle to set records due to its low mileage and manual transmission, with @CASCADE1 recognizing the foresight of the previous owner in preserving the car and saying that it should set a record. @mikestoneclark also voiced personal sentiment, stating he had no idea he needed an FJ Cruiser until he saw this auction, labelling it an absolute "cream puff."
Neutral: The Seller, @michaelmotorcar, provided various details about the auction and addressed comments from users, clarifying that the vehicle has a PA title but is offered in NJ. However, some commenters, such as @BMA, pointed out that another low-mileage FJ Cruiser was listed on a competing site, which could affect the auction's outcome. There were mixed opinions on how the timing of this auction might impact other sellers, with @marcander76 and @CASCADE1 discussing the competitive nature of the current market.
Negative: Some negative comments emerged regarding practicality and collectability. @Mudman3110 expressed concern over the lack of use, questioning who buys such vehicles without driving them, while @CRUSH mentioned needing a vehicle with lower mileage to suit his preferences. Additionally, @candreae critiqued the listing clarity and called for more detailed information about the vehicle's features. @Dracallo raised confusion about the title logistics, indicating that not all details were clear to potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ParkPlaceLTD expresses excitement about offering a beautiful Maserati QP for sale at No Reserve, inviting potential bidders to ask questions and wishing them luck in the auction. @JayReddy shares a positive experience with a similar model, noting it had 40,000 trouble-free miles and was a joy to drive, highlighting its engineering excellence during Ferrari's ownership of Maserati.
Neutral: @safulop acknowledges that the car looks superior cosmetically, but mentions the lack of service records makes it difficult to know what might need attention. They appreciate the car's interior quality and detail, such as a non-sagging Alcantara headliner and well-maintained surfaces, while raising a question about the steering wheel color. @ParkPlaceLTD responds to @safulop regarding the interior colors, clarifying that the steering wheel is black, which matches the overall interior.
Negative: @safulop expresses concern over the lack of positive comments for their own previous vehicle sold at the same auction venue, suggesting it might indicate a market trend where only car dealers bid, potentially affecting the final price. They also highlight common maintenance issues that could arise before reaching such mileage without service records, further emphasizing potential uncertainty about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle, noting it as 'the most perfect SUV ever made' and highlighting its good condition despite its age. The seller mentioned that the vehicle has undergone regular maintenance and has not shown significant mechanical or electrical issues. Positive feedback on the smog check results indicates confidence in the car's operating status, and the interior's condition is also praised, with the seller emphasizing that they are non-smokers with no children or pets, maintaining a clean environment inside the vehicle.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about the vehicle's maintenance history and physical condition, showing potential buyers weighing their options. Questions about the vehicle's accident history were thoroughly addressed, with the seller providing documentation that reassured viewers about the car's safety features and previous repairs. The reliance on reputable mechanic services for maintenance was acknowledged, though some buyers expressed concerns over specifics like the timing belt and water pump replacement dates noted in the Carfax report and the lack of clarity on tire conditions.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding potential oil leaks, the condition of the paint due to sun exposure, and the possibility of mechanical issues given the vehicle's age. One user questioned whether the oil pan and gasket were original, indicating a desire for more definitive answers about the car's longevity and durability. Additionally, prospective buyers expressed slight skepticism about the accuracy of maintenance records, particularly relating to the timing belt and water pump replacements and the implications of past service costs.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @arhouston described the bike as a deliciously bizarre ride with racing colors on a cruiser. @Lunarnighthawk stated that the color combination is striking in person and likened it to Bubba Shobert's flat track bike. @Pattet reminisced about the paint job, comparing it to the red, white, and blue on their ‘84 Interceptor, which they found appealing. @joeveto praised the bike for its aesthetic, suggesting it would be perfect for cruising scenic areas, a sentiment echoed by @rickaz who noted the livery is fitting for Independence Day. Overall, many comments highlight the bike's eye-catching appearance and suitability for leisurely rides.
Neutral: @Lunarnighthawk clarified several queries regarding the bike's condition and history, confirming it has the factory paint, and responding to various inquiries about parts and readiness for long-distance riding. @dkchambers asked about how to contact the seller regarding an unrelated accessory, and @pmbleupacific expressed curiosity about the mileage and whether the bike was in storage. There are discussions about the bike's origins and care from previous owners, with @Lunarnighthawk providing insights into its pristine condition and maintenance.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the bike's original tires, which @Lunarnighthawk noted were 14 years old, indicating they should be replaced for safety on long trips. @mtrctylarry asked about the OEM exhaust, to which @Lunarnighthawk expressed regret that it was not included and indicated that finding an OEM exhaust is challenging due to the uniqueness of the RS model. @CrashTestRider inquired whether the seller could hold onto the bike post-sale to accommodate their arrangements, highlighting potential issues buyers might face in transitioning to ownership.
|
24-Years-Owned LS1-Powered 1987 Porsche 944 5-Speed Project
WP0AB0945HN477557
Lot 199860
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Charleetuner finds the LS engine sound appealing and wishes the seller good luck with the sale. @MHogue sees potential in the vehicle as a fun project and a blast to drive, while @Rgbyrunner21, an LS1 944 owner, expresses support and shares their own experience with a similar build. @Blord30 commends the seller's build and is curious about the functionality of the gauges, echoing a shared enthusiasm within the community for innovative swaps like this.
Neutral: @Crashed9xs (The Seller) addresses various inquiries from @joeveato, detailing the brake issues and explaining that he suspects a bad master cylinder may be the cause despite having bled the brakes multiple times. He also clarifies that the original chassis remains unaltered and provides specific details about the LS1 engine's origin and modifications, including the clutch history and gauge functionality. Additionally, he promises to upload videos showcasing the car's performance, illustrating a proactive approach to communicating with potential buyers.
Negative: @joeveato raises concerns about the unclear status of the braking system, questioning what 'unknown issues' mean and suggesting possible causes. @BlackGoat inquires about the specifics of the engine donor, mileage, and the presence of any documentation, indicating skepticism about the build's history. @Bbesser humorously questions @Blord30's interest in the vehicle if he is undertaking another swap, hinting at potential rivalry or competition within the automotive enthusiast community.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the 2002 Audi S8, often highlighting its rarity and exceptional condition. @VantageAuto, the seller, referred to the vehicle as a 'total unicorn' and emphasized its low mileage and impressive performance, describing it as 'absolutely amazing' and 'classy'. Other users, like @Turbowned and @MTH, echoed these sentiments, praising the car's preservation and driveability, with @MTH even remarking it to be 'one of the nicest D2 S8s in existence'. The positive reactions suggest excitement among potential buyers and a consensus on the car's desirability as a collector's piece.
Neutral: Several comments raised questions about the vehicle's condition and history. @charron98 questioned how the car could have such low mileage, prompting @VantageAuto to clarify that the vehicle was owned by individuals with multiple cars, allowing it to remain a lightly used third vehicle. A few users, like @jtenright and @Litigator, sought specific maintenance information and service records, reflecting a general caution among buyers about potential upkeep concerns. Mention of previous service events and descriptions of the car’s current functionality indicated that many prospective bidders are conducting thorough due diligence before making bids.
Negative: A few commenters expressed reservations about the car's condition and history. @Mav624 pointed out visible damage to the front bumper, asking for explanations about any potential repairs that might be necessary. Similarly, @Paschal sought details about the scuffed bumper, indicating some skepticism regarding the car's overall condition. @hughc shared his negative experience with a different vehicle, suggesting that he might be wary of unforeseen maintenance issues based on past encounters. Overall, these concerns indicate that while many users are interested, there is a segment that remains cautious about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Erioc noted the beautiful restoration of the vehicle, expressing admiration for its aesthetics. @Bordeaux commented on the car's design, likening it to French Art Deco, highlighting the impressive interior as a work of art. @WCD2020 showcased their excitement about the vehicle's extensive restoration and original features, emphasizing its rarity and appeal as a classic American car.
Neutral: @mick59 raised a practical concern about the paint damage and suggested repairs before sale. @The_Art_Doctor requested additional photos and information regarding the chassis and the vehicle's condition. Meanwhile, @demoner1 inquired about functional aspects of the car, such as the accuracy of the fuel gauge and the condition of various electrical components.
Negative: @trevorwraps expressed disappointment regarding the gas spillage that could complicate the car's appearance, indicating it would require a full repaint. @kubes40 challenged the claim of a complete restoration, asserting it didn't meet the necessary standards. @464evr also shared skepticism about the vehicle's claimed features, particularly regarding the authenticity and condition of the chassis.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received several compliments regarding its condition and care. Commentors like @rwhtenn expressed excitement about the listing and are eager to see the car in person. @TonyDJ described it as absolutely beautiful, praising its cleanliness and meticulous garage storage, indicating that it has been well cared for over the years. The seller notes that the car has been a 'fun car' for 21 years, always garage-kept, climate-controlled, and never driven in the rain, which adds to the positive reinforcement about its upkeep.
Neutral: There are inquiries about the vehicle's history and maintenance details. @shelbtgtc55 asked about the original wheels, indicating a desire for specific details regarding the car's authenticity and modifications. @harley4jcs questioned the statement about the mileage, reflecting some confusion about the vehicle's use. Other commentors also requested maintenance records, focusing particularly on the timing belt due to its age and the recommendations surrounding its replacement, indicating a general interest in the car's reliability.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the car's history and potential issues. For instance, @gyrator01 mentioned discussions around the vehicle being in a flood zone and questioned any flood damage. @barrygreen pointed out the importance of the timing belt due to the car's engine type, while also raising concerns about minor cosmetic issues like a chip on the hood. @abahog asked about potential trouble with memory seat settings, highlighting the possibility of functionality issues, which could deter some buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @AutoDreamRides highlights the vehicle's eye-catching design, exceptional paint job, and low mileage, emphasizing that the car has been well cared for and kept in a garage. With a unique color combination and a range of premium upgrades including a fantastic sports shifter, the seller expresses their enjoyment in driving the car. Positive remarks from bidders, such as @MTH calling it a "beautiful car," and @DatzMYcar praising the stunning color, also contribute to the favorable perception of the vehicle, with @BlitzLead categorizing it as one of the best cars they've owned.
Neutral: Several commenters have engaged in discussions about features and specifics of the vehicle. @johnvine requested detailed tire date codes and images of specific parts, while @irondesign inquired about dashboard lights and any potential odors within the car. These questions highlight the interest from potential buyers in verifying the car's condition and history, indicating a thorough approach to bidding. @jcp911s added insights about the hydraulic power steering and the non-issue IMS bearing, reinforcing a balanced view on the vehicle's performance qualifications.
Negative: There are a few humorous and skeptical remarks regarding the car's practicality. @Spokayman corrected @YFFL about the 2006 Cayman S transmission specifications, revealing some confusion about features among commenters. Additionally, @irondesign's questions about dashboard lights and smoke smells suggest concerns about transparency from the seller, which might raise potential bidders' apprehensions. Although @jfoglia has attempted to clarify the situation, the initial doubts reflect the cautious mentality of some participants in the auction.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ahsmaroon highlighted the uniqueness of the personalized plates in German, stating they are a must for the auction winner and reflect the vehicle's location. @ModernClassicNJ has shared that the van has seen very little use and is being professionally presented, inviting potential bidders to ask questions and review additional images and videos that will enhance the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: @gude and @KevorkM both inquired about the presence of additional air conditioning in the coach and whether a generator is included to power it. @Risip350 also requested a video of the display screen's functionality and a walkthrough of the vehicle. In response, @ModernClassicNJ confirmed that there is a rear auxiliary A/C unit but no generator, and promised to provide both images and videos, which they subsequently delivered. Additionally, they clarified the presence of a 30 Amp power inlet for shore power access.
Negative: @mickeyhassey raised concerns regarding the van's emission failures as noted in the Carfax report. @ModernClassicNJ addressed this by explaining that the failures were due to the vehicle not being driven enough after its initial delivery and following a battery replacement, which prevented the monitors from being set. These explanations point to issues of past usage rather than current vehicle reliability, which may raise concerns for potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @DRAIDEZ1 notes the power of the vehicle, comparing it favorably against his previous BMW E39 540 M Sport, suggesting a thrilling driving experience with this car as well. @SlowNRusty appreciates the ride height of the M3, commending it as being perfectly adjusted. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) describes the E46 M3 as a sublime performance vehicle with unmatched driving engagement and timeless appeal, emphasizing its impressive specs including an 8000 RPM redline and 333 horsepower. Furthermore, the seller boasts about their commitment to transparency in their business practices and has garnered numerous positive reviews from satisfied customers.
Neutral: @sok23 raises valid concerns about addressing critical maintenance points in the vehicle's history, specifically the rod bearings, subframe reinforcement, and VANOS system. In response, @Zen_e46m3 provides insights regarding the rod bearing service bulletin applicability and mentions that the seller can verify completion with BMW. @DaveHasTrailer requests more information about the lowering springs and paint meter readings while expressing interest in a driving video to assess the exhaust sound. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) confirms the rod bearing recall was performed at the dealership and attempts to provide clarity about the service history.
Negative: @funkyman expresses skepticism regarding the absence of detailed service records, questioning why all service dates are listed for 2020, implying potential issues with the vehicle's maintenance history. @DaveHasTrailer also pressures the seller for more documentation on the rod bearing recall's details and further paint meter readings, suggesting a lack of confidence in the transparency of the seller's assurances. Lastly, @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) acknowledges the concerns raised but reassures potential buyers of the vehicle's solid performance while also recognizing that the older tires may need to be replaced.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received a lot of praise for its nostalgic appeal and quality. @VintageDreamsAuto mentioned it affectionately as 'Grandpa Truck,' highlighting its unique history being passed down through family members. Commenters like @robbiefarmer and @cowboyjoe complimented the truck's tough look and thorough presentation in the auction, expressing their hopes for the seller to achieve a good price. Many comments reflect a strong emotional connection to classic trucks, emphasizing their charm and the memories associated with them.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding the truck's specifications and functionality. @swolff asked about the vehicle's drive type, while @martinijuan sought videos of the truck in action. @WIZZZZ and @macanguish raised questions about the presence of power steering and brakes, along with concerns about leaks and electrical functions. The seller addressed these queries, confirming that it lacks power steering and confirmed various working conditions of the truck's electrical components, stating that it is mostly in good condition for its age.
Negative: A few concerns were noted regarding the truck's performance and features. Commenters like @WIZZZZ and @macanguish pointed out the absence of power steering and brakes, with @WIZZZZ also questioning potential leaks and the functionality of the AC. @VintageDreamsAuto acknowledged some oil leaks but reassured that there are no major issues. The intermittent blinkers and lack of a horn were humorously mentioned, suggesting some minor inconveniences with the vehicle, but overall, these comments did not detract significantly from the appreciation expressed for the truck.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed appreciation for the upgrades and performance capabilities of the vehicle, with @TJP noting the dual-purpose use for both daily driving and track performance, while @b.flippo highlighted the enjoyment of driving the S197 on road courses. @Falcon7711 complimented the Boss 302's appearance, acknowledging it as a great-looking car. Moreover, @MarcWarren, the seller, has engaged actively with potential buyers, providing requested information and clarifying modifications, further showcasing the vehicle's appeal and the seller’s transparency.
Neutral: Several questions were raised regarding specifics about the car's modifications and performance issues. @classic_steel asked for a closer look at the car's top, while @matthewnieves53 inquired about a whine from the rear differential. @wolf22m sought clarification on the modifications made to the panels, and @TJP asked for details regarding the transmission replacement, showing interest from buyers who want thorough information before considering a purchase. The seller, @MarcWarren, responded comprehensively to these inquiries, demonstrating a willingness to provide detailed vehicle specifications and history.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about certain aspects of the vehicle. @wolf22m highlighted potential issues regarding the modifications to the panels, and @Falcon7711 pointed out an unusual term in the description, "a divorced clutch hydraulic system," suggesting that it may not be a preferred feature. Additionally, @matthewnieves53 expressed concern about the whine in the rear differential, which @MarcWarren addressed but indicated it was a noticeable feature after modifications were made. These comments reflect hesitations regarding some of the car's modifications and performance characteristics.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express positive sentiments about the vehicle's aesthetics and nostalgic value. @KYOB describes the car as very nice, while @sbpetrok shares a fond memory of building a model of the exact car, emphasizing its significance in his early life. @johnnyvett fondly recounts his experience with the 1978 Corvette Pace Car, highlighting the excitement surrounding its new fastback design, and notes the competitive drive to own such a car. Additionally, @NCRSmaniac mentions that these are special cars, indicating a sense of uniqueness and desirability associated with this model.
Neutral: Some comments seek clarifications regarding the vehicle's details and pricing. @Bawston asks for a Carfax report to verify the mileage, while @ajltsj25 requests clarification on conflicting mileage figures presented in the listing photos. @RickMZ06 suggests that the base motor versions, despite being less desirable, can still be good drivers, pointing out some features that might need attention under the hood. There were also discussions regarding the dealer fees, with @fastfaster and @ddanyluk23 questioning the rationale behind additional charges, indicating that buyers are looking for transparency in the auction process.
Negative: Negative sentiments are largely focused on the added dealer fee and concerns about the mileage authenticity. @fifi01 criticizes the $999 fee as inappropriate for an auction format, suggesting that it detracts from the bid's integrity. @Big5 and @Noisyboyz share similar sentiments, reflecting a broader consensus that dealer fees are generally seen as pure profit and harmful for auction participants. @ajltsj25 raises concerns about potential odometer discrepancies, questioning the integrity of the mileage claims, while other commenters express skepticism about such low mileage given the vehicle's age and condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @hot_wire expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, calling it a "dream spec" and mentioning a long-standing fascination with the model since childhood. This positive sentiment reflects a strong emotional connection to the car and highlights its appeal to potential buyers. Additionally, @sobecosmos (The Seller) maintained a consistent and transparent dialogue, offering comprehensive responses to all inquiries and showcasing the car's well-maintained condition and functional features, such as the confirmed operability of the windows. This level of engagement is likely to build trust with prospective buyers.
Neutral: There were several inquiries by commenters regarding the vehicle's accident history and maintenance records, notably from @wmcnair and @NSXphil. @sobecosmos (The Seller) clarified that the car had a severe accident reported in 1999 but emphasized that there has been no structural damage, nor any signs of the incident affecting the car's drivability. The seller acknowledged the concerns about the odometer's repair history but provided the context that the previous owner had been transparent about it, which demonstrates a balanced and informative approach to addressing potential buyer hesitations without overtly promoting the vehicle.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's condition and history. @PNinSF questioned the accuracy of the odometer reading, suggesting it might be labeled "TMU" (True Mileage Unknown), which could deter bidders. @NSXphil also pointed out potential evidence of accident damage in a specific image and requested more detailed photos, underlining a pressing concern about the vehicle's structural integrity. @ScooterWilliams mentioned the uncertainty surrounding the accident history and suggested that a thorough inspection on a lift with clear photographs would enhance confidence in the car's condition, indicating a lack of reassurance among some potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Roverguy70 (The Seller) describes the RR P38 as a classic model in excellent mechanical condition, emphasizing that it is rust-free, has a great exterior and interior, and is well maintained. @dmnmkmcm5 and @Cjcall0809 compliment the vehicle's beautiful combination of colors and express admiration for its upkeep. The seller highlights that there are no mechanical issues, all lights are functional, and the vehicle's original carpet is in perfect shape, further establishing a positive impression. Additionally, the inclusion of original Land Rover accessories and a willingness to provide additional driving videos shows commitment to transparency and customer satisfaction.
Neutral: There are a few queries from potential buyers regarding specific features of the vehicle, such as the air suspension system, alignment concerns, and functionality of the cruise control. @spottswood86 and @Arh23 ask about the original air suspension setup and alignment issues, respectively, indicating they are interested in the technical aspects. @Cjcall0809 also inquires about the driving video and the condition of the carpets under the mats, showing that potential buyers are curious to see more detailed information before making a decision but have not expressed strong opinions either way about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: There are some minor concerns raised about the navigation and HVAC pixels not functioning properly, although @Roverguy70 clarifies that this does not affect the overall performance of the vehicle. The mention of needed repairs and the absence of certain features could lead to hesitation among buyers. Additionally, @Arh23 questions whether the vehicle needs an alignment based on a driving video, although the seller defends the vehicle's handling. These concerns suggest that while the vehicle has positive attributes, there are aspects that may need attention before purchase.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Tomme9 describes the car as beautiful and notes their fond memories of a similar model from the past, highlighting a positive outlook on the vintage car market. @Glwa! shares similar sentiments, indicating that their first car was a 1973 tii, which remains their favorite. @Bimerzworld and @broovy also express admiration for the car's stunning condition and appealing aesthetics, suggesting it would make someone very happy. @JGraham commends the restoration of the tii, appreciating the nostalgic imagery it evokes of a bygone era. Lastly, @Kfarshad (The Seller) emphasizes the extensive effort behind the restoration process, sharing their pride in the car's driving performance and luxurious features.
Neutral: @schuetz1619 provides a note regarding the car's model year, mentioning that it is inaccurately listed as a 1971, yet appreciates the vehicle's overall beauty. Comments about the unique characteristics of the tii, such as the snorkel issue raised by @fredhamm333 and @TurkisTii, indicate a curiosity about the car's authenticity without being overly critical. Meanwhile, @02Les questions some aspects of the car's condition, specifically regarding odd-looking bumpers and gauge clusters, which seem to provoke some further discussion among the commenters. @Kfarshad (The Seller) includes detailed responses about the sourcing of parts and reassures the community of the car's authenticity and thorough restoration.
Negative: Some comments point out potential flaws in the car's restoration. For instance, @groceg expresses doubts about the integrity of the car's tii heritage, suggesting that while the condition may be good, there are concerns about authenticity. @02Les and @Theothomps both raise questions about the alignment of the passenger door, hinting at possible issues with the restoration. @bfpatterson mentions concerns over the fit of the hood and inquires about the condition of the rubber bushings in the suspension, implying there may be unaddressed areas of maintenance. Additionally, @John_in_DC inquires about the absence of air conditioning, reflecting the practicality concerns that a potential buyer might have.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments about the vehicle reflect a strong appreciation for its design and legacy. @EsteBond (The Seller) expresses heartfelt sentiment towards the FJ43, considering it a tribute to someone special. They emphasize their enthusiasm for the off-roading vehicle, eager for it to find a new home with either a family or fellow enthusiasts. The seller's updates and encouragements for bidding depict a warm and inviting atmosphere, fostering community interest and connection around this classic model.
Neutral: Some commenters, like @dmlcomm, seek clarification on technical aspects, such as the smog requirements for the vehicle, while expressing admiration for the FJ43 model. @JoeS-12 brings up the aesthetics of the headlights, suggesting the possibility of aftermarket options and custom modifications to achieve a nostalgic look. This exchange shows a shared interest in the vehicle's history and potential modifications while promoting engaging dialogue among potential buyers.
Negative: There are no overtly negative comments about the vehicle; however, @JoeS-12's suggestion about modifying the headlight bezels might imply a contention point among classic car purists. The notion of custom alterations could receive mixed reactions in the enthusiast community, highlighting the delicate balance between preserving originality and personalizing a classic vehicle. No critical feedback about the vehicle's condition or performance was mentioned, maintaining a largely positive discourse.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @greenerdays11 (The Seller) expresses confidence in the vehicle, stating it has zero issues with the top or suspension, which suggests a high level of reliability and condition that enhances its appeal. The use of phrases like "this beauty" and reassurance of no existing problems creates a positive impression for potential buyers.
Neutral: @DriveOnBy asks for additional information about the vehicle, specifically a video showing the roof operation and the functionality of the ABC system. This request is neutral, as it reflects a standard inquiry that prospective buyers might have, indicating their interest in ensuring everything works as intended before making a purchase.
Negative: There are no negative comments referenced regarding the vehicle, indicating a generally favorable view from the community members involved in the discussion. The inquiries made focus on understanding the condition and features rather than pointing out any flaws or issues.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @dtl2000 remarked that the vehicle appears to be a nice driver quality B-GT with potential for the new owner to enhance it further. The seller, @Lightning, expressed fondness for the MGB, highlighting its driver quality and the enjoyment it offers. @malloryross added that there are many blue color options for the 1969 models, suggesting that the car provides fun for its future owner and represents a solid investment that retains value over time. @dtl2000 echoed this sentiment, appreciating the car's condition and expressing confidence in its resale potential while describing the various color customization options available.
Neutral: @Jhammond198 inquired about whether the hood is aluminum, to which @Lightning confirmed it is. Some comments explored historical context and color options for the MGBs, with @malloryross noting the many shades available in 1969. @dtl2000 mentioned the standard colors of that era, sharing insights into past restoration experiences and color changes while recognizing the value of the car in its current state. The discussion included acknowledgment of the vehicle's features, such as the overdrive system mentioned by @stratman101, which enhances the driving experience.
Negative: @K9officer12 raised a concern about a dent under the bumper, which @Lightning admitted to, explaining it was caused by a pet's lead. While overall sentiments about the car were positive, the presence of rust mentioned by @dtl2000 hinted at areas that may require attention from a restoration standpoint, as did the acknowledgment of the car's 'sad condition' at the time of past restorations. Although these comments show some apprehension about the vehicle's condition, they are balanced by optimism about its overall value and potential.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The overall enthusiasm for the 1977 VW Super Beetle convertible shines through in various comments. @AJahnACS (The Seller) describes it as a fun vehicle that's delightful to drive, especially with the top down during summertime. The car's condition appears to be well-maintained, and @AJahnACS indicates that inspections have been performed, which included replacing a leaking fuel pump, and asserts that the vehicle drives well, even at speeds exceeding 50 mph. Furthermore, @kaliclassics and @estroop acknowledge the vehicle's attractive body condition and express their excitement about its performance potential while driving, suggesting that there's confidence in the car's reliability and roadworthiness.
Neutral: Inquiries about the car's specifics are evident throughout the comments. @Kristian1961 asks about the dealership's location and hours, indicating potential interest in seeing the vehicle in person. @carreram raises a question about the availability of a Carfax report, which @AJahnACS clarifies is unavailable due to the vehicle's age but reassures that it appears accident-free based on its condition. Additionally, @GoldenGopher and @estroop request details regarding the driving experience, suspension feel, and floorboard condition, reflecting a keen interest in assessing the car's mechanical integrity before any potential purchase.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the vehicle that potential buyers have raised. @kaliclassics inquires about a noise heard during driving video, indicating there may be some uncertainty about the vehicle's performance. @estroop specifically questions the condition of the floorboards and potential rust issues, which suggest caution about significant repairs potentially being needed. Although @AJahnACS responds by assuring that the vehicle rows gears smoothly without issues and that the floorboards are mostly in good condition except for a single patch, the questions raise a red flag for some buyers regarding the car’s overall reliability.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Erikdb5 commented on the great color combo of the vehicle, noting it as one he had never seen before and expressing fondness for 80s Porsches. @944Armadillo shared a sentiment about the uniqueness of the car's beautiful seats compared to standard leather options in modern cars. @Cultvines reflected positively on the reliability of a similar model he owned, suggesting a high regard for these vehicles, and stated he would buy another once he has the space.
Neutral: @Monarch (The Seller) provided detailed information about the vehicle’s service history, mentioning that it had been serviced twice recently and that they would look into the condition of the steering wheel and clock. Multiple commenters inquired about specific aspects of the car, such as the instrument cluster and suspension work, indicating an interest in its various features and conditions. @Longforlineup also requested updates on several maintenance aspects of the vehicle, showing a desire for transparency in its history.
Negative: @Thunderuppaul expressed concerns about the need for improvements to the paint finish and the condition of the timing belt. @GaryU mentioned he considered buying the vehicle but ultimately decided against it for unspecified reasons, highlighting potential reservations about its appeal. @porsdrvr95 repeatedly asked for updates on several components of the car, reflecting a sense of uncertainty about its condition and maintenance needs.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BitontoAutos praises the stunning color combination of the vehicle, expressing admiration with exclamations of excitement. @donscruisers (The Seller) enthusiastically agrees, emphasizing the aesthetic appeal. @GooseGas83 also contributes to the positive vibe by describing the car as 'saaaweet.' Other comments highlight the vehicle's impressive build quality, with @boaboyoz calling it 'an awesome sight' and 'very cool.'
Neutral: @donscruisers provides detailed information about the vehicle's technical specifications, such as the rear end ratios and transmission options, clarifying that the 3-speed automatic used is the Torqueflite 727, which was known for its reliability. However, @joemish raises questions regarding the rear axle, heater core, and transmission compatibility with the engine, indicating some uncertainty about the car's mechanics and assembly. This suggests a mixture of appreciation and technical interest surrounding this classic car.
Negative: The comments from @midwestfordman indicate some concerns about the state of the vehicle, particularly noting the presence of cobwebs and suggesting that the engine needs extensive detailing. @Chino criticizes the lack of power steering and brakes as well as the absence of air conditioning, implying it could be difficult to drive. Moreover, @joemish and @BadAzp express skepticism regarding the vehicle's mechanics and authenticity, with debate over the transmission and rear end components, leading to doubts about whether this classic can hold up with the high demands of performance.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @patrick.kinsie expresses admiration for his 2016 R, highlighting its impressive performance and efficiency, cruising comfortably while achieving excellent mileage. @JoeFrom603 and @YesPlease22 also compliment the vehicle's aesthetics, calling it beautiful and questioning about potential issues with the coolant system, which indicates interest in maintaining the car's reliability. @dinot shares a sentiment that these cars are underappreciated, noting their impressive sound, speed, and fuel efficiency, while also providing tips on servicing the vehicle before reaching higher mileage. The seller, @nlajoie9, acknowledges the interest and expresses readiness to answer any questions about the car.
Neutral: Several comments include questions regarding the vehicle's features and service history. @YesPlease22 inquires about the coolant system and Apple CarPlay features, while @Guzziguy1 asks about specifics such as the powered tailgate and rear spoiler functionality. @nlajoie9 provides clarifications on service records and the vehicle's current condition, assuring potential buyers of its well-maintained status. The car's absence of Apple CarPlay in the 2016 models is mentioned by @B-Hawk, indicating it may not meet every buyer's desired specifications but can be retrofitted privately.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding features that are not present in this vehicle model, notably the lack of factory-installed Apple CarPlay and Android Auto mentioned by @B-Hawk and @s3v12, which could be deal-breakers for some tech-savvy buyers. @Doug78 expresses regret that the car lacks a panoramic roof, hinting that this might deter him from pursuing the purchase. Additionally, @Heavyd44 comments on the $280 document fee, showing concern over added costs, though @nlajoie9 assures buyers that the fee would be waived, indicating a responsiveness to such criticisms.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Manalto describes the vehicle as stunning while @Noisyboyz expresses admiration for the Pennant Blue color, suggesting it's more attractive than other examples seen. @rkdinuzzo regards it as one of the most beautiful 1950s American cars, and @RedGTvert exclaims about the stunning color combination. Additionally, @Thatch reflects on it as a lovely slice of 50s Americana, and @ChrisS50 notes the nice restoration. @VetteRestoration_LLC also praises the vehicle, indicating it meets high restoration standards.
Neutral: @Carolinamusclecars (The Seller) confirms that the Pennant Blue is a factory color for the 1954 model and promises to provide NCRS judging sheets and a breakdown of the Bloomington Gold judging sheets. These confirmations add credibility and context but do not lean towards a strong opinion on the vehicle itself. @gravelgrinder requests the NCRS score sheets, signaling a desire for verification of the car's qualities.
Negative: @gravelgrinder also comments, noting the necessity of some easy fixes to elevate the car's status further. Their comment implies potential issues that might detract from the vehicle's appeal if not addressed. However, there are no outright negative remarks about the vehicle's condition or performance; instead, the comments highlight areas for improvement.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Barryward praised the Bel Air, expressing confidence that buyers wouldn't find a nicer option elsewhere. @02fanatic reminisced fondly about their first car, appreciating the aesthetic and expressing a desire to own a similar model. @Bauback described the vehicle's paint job as mesmerizing, indicating it would surely attract attention.
Neutral: @CaptJack22 inquired about the air conditioning system and tire conditions, indicating a practical interest in the car's usability. @JerryYTS responded to various questions, clarifying details about the vehicle's features and condition, such as the lack of rust and the electric fan's performance. @Fresto, @WldBil, and others sought specific information about the trim and the absence of certain parts, indicating interest in the car's condition and details.
Negative: However, several comments showed concern. @JonHall sought reassurance regarding the car's engine reliability and heating issues, indicating skepticism about its readiness for longer trips. @Fresto pointed out missing paint on the driver side rear inner fender well, suggesting potential issues with the vehicle's finish. Overall, while the comments highlighted enthusiasm for the car, they also reflected a desire for more information and assurance about its condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @FastCarLover74 expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle with a simple, joyful emoticon, indicating excitement about the car. @Collectibleclassics, the seller, highlighted their commitment to showcasing unique vehicles and maintaining a high level of customer satisfaction, evident in their 4.9/5 star Google Reviews. They encouraged potential buyers to reach out for more information and noted their transparent selling process, showcasing the confidence they have in the vehicle's quality and appeal.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on the vehicle's condition and sale history. @drtino requested full photos of the driver’s seat to assess wear, while @alexmo inquired about the reason for re-selling the car so soon, reflecting a common concern among potential buyers of vintage vehicles. @Bagger56 informed that the auction was now a ‘No Reserve’ sale, which might attract more bids than before, indicating some changes in the auction strategy.
Negative: On the downside, @jlayco pointed out that the vehicle showed a lot of wear for its reported 25,000 miles, raising questions about its actual condition. The comments from @alexmo and @jlayco suggest potential buyers are cautious and critical about the vehicle's maintenance history and current state. Such observations could hinder the car's desirability and affect the final bids during the auction.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CottonClark praises the Porsche Entry & Drive feature, noting that it greatly enhances convenience, especially after his personal experience with a key fob battery issue. He expresses admiration for the vehicle's many outstanding features and communicates a friendly wish for success to all involved bidders. @sabmiami, the seller, agrees with @CottonClark, highlighting the fantastic features and ease of use that come with the car, and he also appreciates the positive feedback from potential buyers.
Neutral: @rglassman inquires about the completion of the vehicle’s recall emissions modification, indicating a level of concern about compliance. @f4windex points out the potential visibility of the recall sticker in a specific photo, contributing to the discussion around the vehicle's condition. The seller, @sabmiami, confirms that the emissions recall was completed and provides a close-up photo of the sticker to reassure potential buyers of the car's status.
Negative: @Chinaloy raises concerns regarding the car's condition, specifically asking about an oil leak, coolant leaks, and noting damage to the rocker panel in one of the pictures. This raises questions about the car's maintenance and history. @sabmiami responds to these queries by reassuring @Chinaloy that there are no oil or coolant leaks and mentions that the car was recently inspected by locals, addressing the concerns raised.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, appreciating its color combination and overall beauty. @Cinker described it as 'beautiful', while @LongFella highlighted Aquamarine Blue as his favorite Porsche color, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @LilSnort and @tlcamg both praised the driving video, with @tlcamg noting the car's cool appearance with the sunroof open. Several users, including @alaninvancouver and @GDogg, complemented the stunning color combo, and @pgharris and @Carfan_73 shared fondness for the color pairing of Aquamarine Blue with red interior, indicating it to be an outstanding combination.
Neutral: Several commenters provided relevant information and insights about the car's features and history. @FantasyJunction, the seller, explained the modifications made to the vehicle, including its restored condition, the installation of a '912 engine', and upgrades to enhance the driving experience. @LawDog and @Flunder908 discussed specific features, such as the absence of a radio despite having speakers, and @Flunder908 provided technical details about the original engine's specs. Many commentators reflected on the vehicle's condition and modifications without expressing strong opinions, indicating appreciation for the chance to bid on the car and a desire for further information, such as paint readings and the verification of minor details.
Negative: A few comments reflected concerns or reservations about the vehicle. @jimmytheirishman acknowledged that purists might disapprove of the color change and the engine replacement, but found the car beautiful nonetheless. @59turner expressed a desire to see the car in its original colors, suggesting some conflict over the modifications. @GARAGE2SML raised a question about a possible paint flaw on the passenger front fender, while there was a mention of potential missing components, like black wheel center caps, indicating areas where the car may not meet the highest standards expected from classic vehicles.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has garnered admiration for its beauty and the unique experience it offers to drivers. Commenters have expressed affection for its classic design, with one user, @Speedraser, highlighting their own history with a +8 and the appeal of vintage vehicles still being produced. The current seller, @mrjgmorales, reassured potential buyers, noting that the car has no overheating issues and runs smoothly at an optimal temperature, which was further corroborated by inquiries about the upgrades, such as the updated aluminum radiator and factory headers.
Neutral: Several users shared personal stories of their relationships with similar vehicles, discussing factors influencing their decisions to sell or consider buying a Morgan. @DocMGL expressed interest in the new models while weighing their conveniences against the charm of older models. The conversation also touched on the challenges older users face when entering and exiting such cars due to health issues, with multiple commenters, including @OldishGuy, empathizing with the seller's situation and sharing their own experiences with physical limitations.
Negative: Despite the positive sentiments, some comments reflected skepticism about the current and newer Morgan models' practicality. @DocMGL raised concerns regarding the functionality of interior features and the high price point without sufficient modern amenities. Others like @Speedraser lamented the lack of manual transmission options in newer models, calling it a dealbreaker. Additionally, @60Bird's remarks about understanding whether the car could meet California's smog regulations indicated apprehensions regarding environmental compliance, potentially impacting its usability.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg called the vehicle a lovely Mondial Cabriolet and expressed admiration by saying "Bellissima!" while wishing the seller the best. @Kishote shared their nostalgic experience with a previous Ferrari cabriolet, emphasizing its enjoyable driving experience, especially for family outings. Overall, these comments reflect a positive sentiment towards the aesthetic appeal and driving experience of the vehicle.
Neutral: @Bpercy (The Seller) provided detailed responses to inquiries about shipping to the USA, stating they have two shipping companies to assist with cross-border transport and clarified the process for title transfer after payment. In response to questions about service records, they shared a comprehensive breakdown of recent maintenance and repairs performed on the vehicle, which includes substantial expenditure on crucial components.
Negative: @VWP-Nut criticized the current bidding, suggesting that it doesn't even cover the service records the owner has paid for, hinting at concerns about the vehicle's valuation. @Dinodino also expressed skepticism regarding service costs, finding them absurdly high despite acknowledging the work done, implying potential issues with the pricing structure and maintenance financial burden.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @gb70 praised the Lexus LS430 for its quality construction and reliability, calling it one of the most comfortable vehicles he has driven. @mr_smee expressed that even twenty-plus years later, buying this vehicle is still a smart financial decision. @Gslide noted the car looked remarkably clean and suggested it is a worthwhile buy.
Neutral: @aegmotorsports (The Seller) confirmed features such as the rear heated seats and clarified that the car does not have a rear coolant but does have a trunk pass-through. The seller also confirmed the interior color as Cashmere and stated that the timing belt service, including several other repairs like an oil service, had been completed before the sale. Moreover, they provided details about the vehicle's equipment, such as parking sensors and climate control, while answering inquiries about the air conditioning and tire date codes.
Negative: @DanD04 raised concerns regarding the timing belt, indicating that evidence of its replacement should be provided at this age and mileage. Additionally, @PappaSierraHotel requested documentation covering various repairs, including those for the water pump and timing belt, which hints at the necessity for transparency about the vehicle's maintenance history. @posetong asked about potential leaks from engine seals and other operational issues, reflecting apprehension about the car's condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Vancitysai (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a very solid car, noting that, despite being a 30-year-old model, the majority of it is in great shape for the year. They mention having owned it for almost three years, only driving it less than 1000 km in Canada during summer, and confirming it has not been exposed to snow. The seller offers to provide additional pictures and highlights that the vehicle has been kept in a garage for most of the time, showing a high level of care.
Neutral: @JavaM4 brings up the importance of knowing the last timing belt replacement, mentioning it typically should be done every 100,000 km or sooner. The seller acknowledges the timing belt was last replaced at 96,000 km according to a Japanese sticker, and shows willingness to check the vehicle further. There is also a discussion about the vehicle's potential repainting history, with the seller confirming their belief that it may have been repainted in Japan at some point, as evidenced by details raised by the commenters.
Negative: @Originalcanadian86Bj70 questions any rust issues, mentioning specific concerns about the windshield pillar. Despite @Vancitysai's assurance of the vehicle's overall decent condition, the presence of surface rust on Toyotas is acknowledged, which may signal potential long-term concerns. @barker.shane raises a discrepancy with the grilles, questioning if the heritage grille is OEM and whether the original is still available, suggesting concerns about modifications that could affect the vehicle's value.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle receives praise for its original condition and overall appeal, with @tim54575 (The Seller) and @groceg affirming its excellent state and clean appearance. @alskin highlights it as an ideal car for a California drive, emphasizing the fun aspect of cruising with the top down. Additionally, @Dr.T notes the solid foundation of the car and mentions that the factory top is in good condition despite its age, while @minibikeguy suggests that a driving video would enhance the listing, implying a positive interest in the car's performance.
Neutral: Several comments focus on specifics and clarifications, such as @Robert27329 asking about the functionality of the smog pump and @ranta18 questioning whether the top fully closes without water ingress issues. @Daveco raises concerns regarding the consistency of images in the listing, suggesting that different cars may have been presented, while @Rich_Truett points out a photo error related to the vehicle's model year, illustrating the cautious scrutiny of potential buyers. @tim54575 (The Seller) responds sincerely to these inquiries, acknowledging the need for clarity and assuring that the car has been well maintained.
Negative: Conversely, some comments raise concerns about the vehicle's authenticity and condition. @Daveco expresses confusion over what appears to be images of two different cars and questions the vehicle's overall condition, suggesting possible inconsistencies in the listing. Similarly, issues such as missing components like the A/C compressor were noted by @Dr.T, indicating that while the car has strong aspects, it may not be entirely complete or original. @1935V8 also inquires about potential rust due to the use of salt in Minnesota, reflecting a concern for the vehicle's structural integrity.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Gpol expressed interest in the vehicle asking if it comes with a hard top caddy and soft top parade boot. @Tbird2004 responded positively, confirming that both items are included in the sale and uploaded fresh photos of them. Furthermore, the original hard-top parade boot has never been used, which adds value to the purchase for collectors or enthusiasts.
Neutral: @newcarpro provided detailed specifications about the vehicle, including information like the build date, engine type, and warranty data. This thorough breakdown suggests that the 2004 Thunderbird is a well-documented vehicle, which may be appreciated by potential buyers seeking comprehensive information before making a decision.
Negative: @Pacmansr raised a concern regarding the vehicle's air conditioning system, noting that the Carfax indicated it was recharged twice and inquiring if the compressor was replaced. @Tbird2004 addressed this issue, indicating that while the A/C system has shown two recharge entries, the original owner does not recall any repairs or issues, as the system currently operates efficiently. However, this does suggest a potential concern for future buyers regarding the historical reliability of the A/C system.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BashfulCrawDad7 expressed admiration for the car, calling it stunningly beautiful and a great example of the S5 model from this generation. They mentioned that if they could afford it, they would definitely buy it, wishing the seller a wonderful day. Additionally, @tesoffice complimented the unique silver interior combination, noting it as a lovely choice and appreciating the car's overall aesthetic.
Neutral: @ChristopherM3 provided information about the Prestige package, indicating it was the highest optioned package available. @Erfer1 confirmed the features included in this package, such as a Bang & Olufsen sound system and navigation, adding that the specific car does not have the optional sports differential. @MyFirstTime requested a video of a cold start, and @Erfer1 stated they would attempt to upload videos soon, reinforcing the engagement with potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle were raised by @tesoffice regarding a noted scratch on the rear bumper cover, seeking clarification about its location based on the photos provided. While @Erfer1 acknowledged the scratch and explained it had been touched up, there were still questions about the visibility of it. Additionally, some comments suggest a general hesitation among users about purchasing, noting they do not intend to bid or buy the car, exemplified by @BashfulCrawDad7's statement which highlights budget constraints.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BBK describes the vehicle as beautiful and appreciates its low mileage, reminiscing about his own experience with a 2011 HSE which he loved for its reliability. @Woody shares a similar positive sentiment, stating that his 2011 model, identical to this one, has given him no trouble at all despite high mileage, making him feel proud to use it. @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) emphasizes the stunning quality of the vehicle, inviting bids with excitement, and assures potential buyers of the excellent maintenance record, showcasing the truck’s impressive service history through Carfax.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @NtrSandman and @daveterk, ask specific questions about the vehicle's condition, such as the headliner and the cargo area features, indicating a general interest in the mechanical and aesthetic details. @sbmaine expresses curiosity about the vehicle's suspension settings, which @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) promptly addresses, assuring bidders that the suspension is functioning perfectly. @HumbleMonkey and @Rock26 seek additional information on aftermarket options like a tow package and warranty costs, showing a practical consideration for potential buyers.
Negative: Contrarily, concerns arise regarding possible imperfections in the vehicle's condition. @etarasov and @vinceclortho express doubts about the headliner, suggesting that it might be sagging, which @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) acknowledges, albeit downplaying any significant issues. Moreover, @BrettonG questions the accuracy of the vehicle's color description in the listing, revealing confusion that could affect buyer trust. Additionally, @Cody150 points out that the vehicle's seats do not appear to be ventilated, contradicting the listing details and sparking a correction from @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) regarding the features of the seats.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Big_DaddyRL started the excitement by encouraging bidders with enthusiasm, stating, "Let the bidding begin!!! ❤️🎉" @karceo94 complemented the vehicle's beauty, adding, "kicking it off! looks beautiful! GLWTA!" @Y2K911 praised the Miata's original steel wheel base and noted its amazing condition, advising bidders to research its features to better understand its mechanics. Additionally, @SwissMovement shared their satisfaction, saying, "Cannot go wrong with a low miles original owner Miata," while @buickboy63 expressed favoritism towards the base model with no power steering and crank windows, calling it "PERFECT!"
Neutral: @Diamond_Dave mentioned that the vehicle seems to be a non-power steering car, stating that some enthusiasts really enjoy this configuration. He also pointed out the interior's condition, noting some wear on the pedals and slight corrosion on the accelerator pedal. Conversely, @FredRSmith questioned how neglect could cause pedal wear, suggesting that the wear on the rubber seemed normal for a car with 50,000 miles. In response, @Miata1989 (The Seller) clarified the comments regarding rust, insisting that the red paint was visible and misidentified, explaining that the Miata had always been stored indoors during winter months.
Negative: On a more concerning note, @GavinL raised a significant issue regarding what he perceived as rust ahead of the driver’s side wheel arch, indicating that it could lead to complicated and costly repairs. @Duke8083 inquired about the rear window's functionality, suspecting it might not zip properly, which raises questions about the vehicle's maintenance. @GavinL reiterated concerns upon clarification, suggesting there was rust in the rocker area, while @Miata1989 (The Seller) responded to concerns about the rear window zipper and confirmed that the Miata was always kept away from salt and snow but still, complications regarding the timing belt and rust repair can be detrimental to the sale.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @powertechselect (The Seller) has presented the 2002 Trans Am WS6 6-speed coupe as an impressive vehicle, noting its extreme cleanliness and great sound, especially with the Borla muffler. The combination of black on black design and tinted windows is highlighted as aesthetically pleasing. Recognizing the car's history, @powertechselect (The Seller) ensures that everything is functional and operational, contributing to a positive view of this classic model. The inclusion of stock wheels was confirmed, further enhancing the appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters provided informative insights about the vehicle. @98WS6 corrected the horsepower ratings of the Firehawk and WS6, while @MidCitiesMildMan offered details regarding the VIN and production that indicates this model's authenticity. There are quality conversations about the car's aftermarket wheels, with @Formuladan acknowledging that they fit the aesthetic well despite a personal preference against such modifications. @brunoscars also engaged by discussing potential tariffs related to importing this car back into Canada, adding another layer of context to the discussion.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle were also raised by some commenters. @ari3535 questioned the condition of the driver's door panel, suspecting cracks, and sought clarification regarding potential issues with bubbles in the paint on the B-pillar, as highlighted by @Shoebop2. They noted that the dimples commonly found on certain parts were likely present, indicating a common issue with this model type. @ari3535 brought attention to undercarriage photos that suggested jagged edges, indicating a need for further investigation, which @powertechselect (The Seller) responded to by seeking additional details.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the design and overall aesthetic of the BMW, with @mr_smee remarking on it as a standout model. @Gheemer admires it as a great option for a first-time BMW owner, highlighting the potential for customization and personal upgrades. @MartyMV, a fellow BMW enthusiast, praises the car's driving abilities, noting that it runs perfectly and matches the seller's honest description, while other users, like @pbagioli, compliment its good looks, suggesting it would make a nice addition to any collection.
Neutral: Some commenters are seeking more information and details about the vehicle's history and condition. @cjbcpa asks for further particulars on the Carfax report, specifically regarding any working or non-working parts of the vehicle, such as the absence of dash pictures. @TheGoodCpt (The Seller) attempts to address questions about the car's accident history, mentioning it had prior damage but no structural issues according to the report. Others request clarification about the condition of specific components, like the timing belt and the AC system, indicating a need for thorough inspections and potential maintenance.
Negative: There are concerns regarding the timing belt, as noted by @Nateyboy30, who suggests it should be replaced soon since there is no definitive record of its last change. This sentiment is echoed by @Gheemer and @TheGoodCpt (The Seller), who indicate that while the car is well-preserved, it may require some maintenance to ensure longevity. Additionally, the air conditioning system's incapacity and outdated refrigerant type has raised red flags, making some potential buyers hesitant as they consider the overall upkeep and potential repairs needed.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments reflect the admiration for the Dodge Viper, emphasizing its status as a collectible gem. @RaceGP1 highlights its rarity and investment potential due to its iconic V10 engine and low mileage. @patrickquade adds to this sentiment by sharing the attention and excitement the Viper generates among people of all ages, indicating a genuine passion for the car, which is likely to increase in value as demand rises. @Kimalden praises the car as a rare addition that is expected to appreciate in value, showcasing the overall positive reception from collectors and enthusiasts.
Neutral: The seller, @2000Firehawk, engages positively with potential buyers by answering detailed inquiries about the vehicle's condition and specifications. He admits to not having maintenance records from the previous owner and shares specific maintenance performed since purchase, including ensuring the car was in good order prior to sale. Several commenters, like @RR2017 and @C3Lee, express appreciation for the seller's transparency and thorough communication about the car's features, such as the air conditioning and any imperfections, maintaining a constructive, informative dialogue.
Negative: There are concerns regarding the modifications made to the vehicle, particularly the removal of the rear mufflers, as highlighted by @PrinceDeadpool and @C3Lee. Some potential buyers express a desire for more detailed evidence of the car’s condition, such as specific photos of potential wear areas and questions about the state of the tires, with @pwrful4 questioning the age of the tires. @RR2017 points out minor imperfections like the wear on the driver's bolster and requests clarification about the car's overall upkeep. These inquiries indicate some hesitancy and demand for assurance from potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @pepfoot describes the vehicle as a "MEAN looking machine," expressing admiration for its aesthetics. @virtuaframax compares it to a "Batmobile," indicating that the vehicle has an impressive and powerful look. Several comments praise its performance and features; @Mstanfill calls it a "killer combination" and appreciates the 7-speed transmission, while @Dean_Laumbach notes the car's showroom condition and optimal mechanical health, emphasizing the joy in having a car that has been driven and well-maintained.
Neutral: The comments by @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) provide details about the car's history and condition, stating that it was purchased from the original owner’s family and has never been tracked, which adds credibility to its care and maintenance. Commenters like @drodga01 and @newcarpro share neutral observations about the final model year of the vehicle and its specifications, giving foundational context without strong emotional undertones. Additionally, @getyourfreakon mentions the mileage being ideal for enjoyment, reflecting a balanced view of the vehicle's usage.
Negative: On the less favorable side, @ransage critiques the car for its low mileage over the years, suggesting it might be a "Garage Queen" rather than a truly enjoyed vehicle. Other commenters engage in back-and-forth discussions regarding this point, with @mt_jkoltrn defending the owner's usage and care. @Gmmuscleusa expresses disappointment that such a potent car was not utilized more and compares it to "putting a tiger in a cage," highlighting a sentiment often shared among car enthusiasts about underused high-performance vehicles.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters have expressed appreciation for the unique qualities of this truck. @CarDogThreePedals highlighted its significance as a special find, reminiscing about the era when vehicles could be customized to individual preferences, including the choice of a V-8 engine. @CW74 and @chris_2morris praised the truck's rare status and superb documentation, emphasizing its well-maintained condition. @Civilguy noted that this beautifully kept truck seems like it would provide many years of happy ownership due to its durable 4.6L engine.
Neutral: @JellyRole, the seller, provided detailed insights into the truck's history, maintenance, and current condition. They clarified that the truck does not have A/C, which was a specific request from potential buyers (@cjs66Mustang and @Schroeder), and emphasized that the truck remained in relatively untouched condition without detailed corrections. The seller also actively engaged with potential buyers, answering their questions and providing additional information and video links about the truck's condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised by a few commenters regarding the absence of air conditioning, particularly in warmer climates. @Civilguy expressed that he would have considered bidding but found the lack of A/C a drawback. @Jenn811 inquired about the truck's underside, highlighting some confusion regarding protective coatings and requesting clearer images to ensure transparency about potential flaws. The overall sentiment surrounding the lack of A/C has caused some hesitation among interested buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @brennan7727 (The Seller) is pleased to inform @hatdog101 that the vehicle has 230 wheel horsepower, indicating it has sufficient power to meet performance needs. Additionally, @brennan7727 expresses a commitment to transparency about the vehicle's condition, stating that issues previously experienced might have been due to a bad battery, which has since been replaced without further problems.
Neutral: @cbas00 raises valid inquiries about missing body kit pieces and the source of an electrical drain, which shows an interest in ensuring the vehicle's full functionality and appearance. @hatdog101's question about horsepower ties into the overall performance narrative of the vehicle, while @r32fan's request for a driving video hints at a desire for further visual assessment before making decisions.
Negative: @cwsteel critiques the seller for not cleaning the air filter before taking pictures, suggesting a lack of attention to detail in presentation. This points to a possible neglect of maintenance issues, which could raise concerns for prospective buyers regarding the overall care of the vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's unique color and design, particularly noting its '70s charm and character. @jfcowell praised the car as one of the best available, and @2hecknback called it a milestone vehicle with an iconic interior and brilliant color. @Audeamus emphasized the beauty of the car, while @Frida remarked on the car being one of the best seen in recent auctions, asserting its qualities as a classic and desirable collector's item. There were also mentions of the owner, @Bosshog, being a trustworthy seller with a wealth of knowledge about the vehicle, which added to the positive reception.
Neutral: Various comments provided technical insights and inquiries about the car's condition and specifications. @tannat questioned the car's stance, while @linderpat speculated on whether the rub strips were added later. Some users mentioned the car's history and rarity, with @teutonic providing statistical data regarding its production numbers. @benandjerry asked detailed questions regarding the vehicle's mechanical condition, focusing on aspects such as the gearbox, alternator gauge, and any potential oil leaks. Overall, while not overly critical, these comments reflected a practical interest in the specifics of the car without necessarily conveying strong positive or negative sentiments.
Negative: A few commenters expressed concerns about certain aspects of the vehicle. @Joe_Macheck noted that the rub strips looked unusual and that their presence detracted from the car's aesthetic. @Stropp had reservations about the cold start behavior, pointing out that it seemed a bit slow. Additionally, @f15ranger observed discolored areas on the fuses, questioning whether they might be indicative of a problem. @Dmhager reflected on the vehicle's unique color combination, stating that their perspectives had shifted regarding these colors, now seeing them as beautiful rather than merely flamboyant. Despite these critiques, the overall impression remained largely favorable.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, particularly praising its classic design and beautiful color scheme. @Singerirv highlighted the classic S1 color combination, while @Mstanfill echoed this sentiment by calling the car a 'beauty' and a 'GEM.' The elegance of the car was noted by @AbbyAk, and @britracing emphasized its iconic status as a quintessential British sports car, referencing its long bonnet and performance. Overall, there was a shared appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and historical significance.
Neutral: The seller, @ajpeyton, provided information regarding the car's mechanical condition and restoration history, noting that it is a perfect driver quality vehicle with a service history dating back to the 1970s. @Tim2 and @ajpeyton exchanged questions and answers about specific features of the car, indicating an interest in its details and functionality. Additionally, @highway129 acknowledged the honest presentation but remarked on the financial implications of a full restoration, showcasing a realistic perspective on the vehicle's value.
Negative: Conversely, some comments reflected discontent or criticism regarding the vehicle's condition. @TheOMDude criticized the presence of vinyl upholstery, deeming it shameful for a car of such stature. There were also humorous remarks about the less-than-ideal backdrop for the car's photos, suggesting that it deserved a more fitting environment, as mentioned by @Winnergoggy. Overall, while the vehicle was admired, there were concerns about its restoration and presentation that some found troubling.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed high praise for the vehicle, highlighting its beautiful condition and low mileage. @T2024 described it as a beautiful vehicle that seems like new, while @genevamotorcars (The Seller) emphasized the car's incredibly clean state, stating it has no needs in the near future. @Unkn0wn47 referred to it as a 'truly a GEM,' acknowledging its exceptional value compared to other options on the market.
Neutral: Responses regarding specific features indicated some curiosity about the vehicle's specifications. @NineNinetyThree993 requested measurements related to the driver's seat height, showing interest in the vehicle's adjustability. @FJbuckets inquired about the stereo system and whether Bluetooth functionality supported music streaming, indicating a desire to learn more about the technology within the car, while @Rjonesz asked for clarification about an aftermarket switch in the steering column.
Negative: Concerns were also raised about potential issues, with @KevinByron questioning the presence of oil on the struts and the state of the exhaust system. Some debate arose around the exhaust, with @Seba39 suggesting it appeared to be different from other models, leading to an exchange about whether incorrect photos had been shared. Furthermore, @MdistelBMW pointed out discrepancies related to the vehicle's underside, expressing hope that it was also rust-free, hinting at some skepticism about its condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments highlight the excellent condition and originality of the vehicle, with @wyospence (The Seller) proudly stating that it is 100% original and has all its original parts. @omerphelps praises the bike's authentic condition and even offers to ship a factory hitch for free, emphasizing the bike's value and the pride of ownership potential for the future buyer. The excitement from potential buyers is palpable, with messages expressing appreciation for the lack of modifications and the overall beauty of the machine.
Neutral: Some comments are geared towards logistical details, with @TLakefalls inquiring about the absence of the original trailer hitch and @wyospence (The Seller) responding that it was likely removed by the previous owner. @wyospence later updates that he installed a factory hitch from another Big Red to give the new owner a functional component until a newer one can be found. This practical information is useful for potential bidders who might want to know about the vehicle's accessories.
Negative: There is a hint of disappointment due to the missing original trailer hitch, as expressed by @TLakefalls. However, this concern is mitigated by the willingness of @omerphelps to provide a hitch and the proactive measures taken by @wyospence (The Seller) to address the issue. Overall, while the absence of the original hitch was noted, it does not appear to deter the enthusiasm around the auction or the appeal of the vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments highlight the vehicle's reliability and performance features, with @acquire praising its quality and capacity compared to other brands like Gator and Polaris, suggesting users get more value at a lower price. Additionally, @TokyoMotorsDC noted that the air conditioning operates well, confirming user satisfaction regarding comfort and functionality.
Neutral: Several comments involve inquiries and procedural information about the vehicle, including a question from @ckindel about the inclusion of a specific wrench and a request for shipping quotes from @Yamatex. @TokyoMotorsDC responded to these queries with assistance regarding the vehicle's features and shipping arrangements, indicating a willingness to help potential buyers.
Negative: There are some concerns related to regulatory changes affecting the registration of kei trucks in Maryland raised by @TokyoMotorsDC, explaining that only vehicles from 1999 and earlier qualify for historical tags in the state, which could limit options for Maryland residents. This comment reflects dissatisfaction with bureaucratic regulations, which @acquire echoed, labeling it as idiotic, suggesting frustration among local buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Kaz791 (The Seller) describes the 3 series convertible as a super clean and well-maintained vehicle that has spent its life in Texas. The seller emphasizes that the car is in excellent condition, highlighting its impressive paint and near spotless interior. Recent maintenance work, including an inspection and fluid and filter service, has been completed, ensuring the car runs smoothly and is accompanied by its original documentation, keys, and a solid service history, as confirmed by CARFAX.
Neutral: @jwmindetroit inquires about the car's Active Cruise Control feature, to which @Kaz791 (The Seller) responds that according to the window sticker, the car is equipped with 'Dynamic Cruise Control' and indicates a need to research its definition by BMW. @Snypar clarifies that the Dynamic Cruise Control feature allows the car to maintain set speeds like traditional cruise control, and additionally has a braking function for speed control when descending hills and a curve speed limiter that adjusts speed during turns.
Negative: There are no significant negative comments about the vehicle noted in the provided summary, as the feedback is primarily focused on the description and features of the car without any negative experiences or issues raised.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @nor.cal praises the vehicle's color as the best and notes its great presentation. @Argenrican reminisces about his teenage admiration for the car, calling it a total dream back then. @Chasetakumi appreciates the clean CRX's recently showcased, giving applause to @OBZU for their offerings. @Caymanorcarrera expresses happiness at the CRX receiving attention and love, regarding it as a fantastic semi-vintage sport coupe. @The_Dude_Abides notes the quality of the vehicle, mentioning a fresh valve cover and admiring the upgrades that enhance its appeal. @gelandegear compliments the car, while @fabzfabz refers to it as a beautiful low mileage unicorn and wishes the best for its sale.
Neutral: @OBZU, the seller, expresses excitement over attracting stunning CRX Si's to the market, highlighting the car's cleanliness and availability for viewings. They also clarify the brand of the wheel spacers used on the vehicle. @mark928gt brings up a concern about a potential leak in a picture, to which @OBZU responds with plans to inspect the issue further. @TahitianGreen acknowledges their interest in the vehicle but expresses financial limitations. The seller interacts with multiple users, ensuring answers and updates regarding the car's condition and features, reinforcing their commitment to transparency and customer engagement.
Negative: @john94si mentions he would be interested in purchasing the vehicle if it were equipped with air conditioning. @PatrickGSR94 raises a concern about the specific placement of the wheels, questioning their orientation. @rayson seeks clarification on potential discoloration or fading on the dash and also worries about a steering wheel issue, which may indicate underlying problems. Overall, concerns about modifications and potential imperfections seem to dampen some enthusiasm among interested parties.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @robroadrunnerservices mentioned a sentimental connection to the vehicle, stating it reminds his wife of Sally from the movie "Cars", indicating a fondness for the car's character and appearance. @jbox2000 has observed that the car seems well sorted, indicating confidence in the vehicle's overall condition especially after the installation of its IMS and clutch.
Neutral: @Rcelik raised a question regarding the mileage discrepancy, noting that the odometer reading showed a minor increase compared to what was reported in the previous sale, which calls for clarification. The seller, @NicholasFERRARI220, responded by clarifying that the increased mileage was simply a typo, suggesting that the current ownership only accounted for 500 miles, not 5,000.
Negative: @242bryan expressed confusion regarding the condition of the transmission, questioning @jbox2000's claim that the transmission had been rebuilt, pointing out that it seems more like a straightforward clutch replacement. This exchange raises concerns about the accuracy of the statements made regarding the vehicle's maintenance and repair history.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Mwrench (The Seller) describes the car as a worthwhile project for restoration or as an outlaw build, emphasizing its potential. @benzog notes it as a great project for the season that is worth the effort and investment. @Caddy80 highlights the rewarding journey that awaits the next owner despite the substantial work required.
Neutral: @rlaverty expresses concern regarding the engine, referring to it as the least capable 911 engine ever produced, and questions the condition of the paintwork. @hudson41 seeks clarification about the engine's origin and its functionality while also raising questions about the car's assembly and repairs. Other commenters like @Maxwell077 and @Frank_Barrett acknowledge the project's challenges and the need for careful evaluation before bidding, with the latter mentioning that it could exceed $100,000 to restore.
Negative: @70SATMan raises significant concerns about the modifications made to the car, including the removal of original seats and the questionable paint job, questioning the quality of the restoration. @jamcracker mentions the seller's lack of response to insightful queries, suggesting it reflects poorly on the sales process. Overall, @Frank_Barrett warns prospective bidders of the hidden costs associated with the restoration, indicating a potentially deeper financial commitment than anticipated.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Love4x4 describes the vehicle as a nice jeep, indicating an overall positive impression. This comment suggests admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic or performance, implying that the vehicle has a strong appeal to potential buyers or enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Valkyrja asks if there is any rubbing on the tires during full articulation, which is a practical inquiry about the vehicle's handling and setup. Comments from @redbull1790 and @paratroopersmith appear focused on gathering more information, with @redbull1790 puzzled over the vehicle's low mileage considering its year and @paratroopersmith requesting additional pictures and details on tire clearance. @Gregc123 seeks clarification regarding the vehicle's graphics, wanting to know whether they are painted or decals. This suggests an interest in the quality or customization of the vehicle.
Negative: @redbull1790's comment, questioning the vehicle's usage history with a sarcastic tone, raises a flag about possible concerns regarding its maintenance or condition. While most comments do not express outright negativity, the tone hints at skepticism about the vehicle's history and condition, particularly given its low mileage and age.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight the enjoyable driving experience of the Speedster, with @67numberfive (The Seller) expressing their delight in how well the car operates, stating it always starts immediately and functions as it should. @Gary_T1 also praises the vehicle, noting its beauty and reminiscing about driving similar roads in the past, which adds a nostalgic touch to the conversation. Additionally, @67numberfive reassures potential buyers about the car's readiness for viewings and inspections, showcasing a willingness to facilitate the buying process.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding the vehicle's condition and service history. @GilSky asked about the availability of a Pre-Purchase Inspection (PPI), while @mytoy95 requested receipts for the repairs done by the current owner. @RDW01 pointed out previous issues reported by past owners, seeking confirmation that all concerns had been addressed and repairs documented. @67numberfive responded to these queries by clarifying the process for PPIs and sharing receipts of completed work, aiming to ensure transparency with potential buyers.
@Mjcayen raised concerns over a lack of communication from the seller after trying to schedule a viewing, mentioning a lack of response to his inquiries about a PPI and inspection availability. The seller assured @Mjcayen that they were open to all inspections and would assist in the process, asking him to check his spam folder for missed replies. This indicates a proactive approach to customer service despite the initial communication hiccup.
Negative: There were some negative sentiments shared regarding the vehicle's past issues. @RDW01 highlighted concerns stemming from a previous owner's experience, questioning whether all identified problems had been resolved and requesting documentation of repairs. This uncertainty could potentially deter buyers who are wary of purchasing a vehicle that may have hidden issues. Additionally, @Mjcayen expressed frustration over not receiving timely responses from the seller, which raised questions about the seller's responsiveness and reliability. Although @67numberfive attempted to address these concerns, the initial lack of communication might leave a lingering doubt for some potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Mshark (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a "drop-dead gorgeous 4Runner" that has been well-maintained and has a stunning appearance. The owner highlights that the car drives beautifully with no leaks, and no engine issues. Another seller, @shacacoora, echoes this sentiment by expressing excitement about the car's aesthetics, indicating it is an attractive offering. The overall maintenance records are presented positively, suggesting that the car has received comprehensive servicing, including a rebuilt transmission and new components throughout.
Neutral: @Mshark (The Seller) addresses several known issues with the vehicle, including an A/C leak and a sunroof leak that has been tentatively fixed but not confirmed. The leak was examined by a mechanic who found no faults with the seals, but moisture was still reported. The seller also mentions that the 4WD system, after being sticky, is now functioning perfectly. The owner encourages potential bidders to evaluate these factors according to their own comfort levels, indicating a transparent approach.
Negative: Despite its many positives, concerns have been raised about potential leaks, particularly regarding the sunroof and the moisture found on the driver's side carpet. @beej questions the specifics of these leaks, suggesting they could stem from other areas if the potential fixes do not hold. @56rider notes the need for the vehicle to undergo a smog check again soon, raising questions about compliance. Additionally, @devolpe55 expresses concern about the vehicle's frame and whether it has been replaced, which remains unanswered by the seller.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @AlfistiNY describes the vehicle as very nice, while @74Fiats calls it gorgeous, praising the clean Bertone styling. @adamc, a former owner, expresses his nostalgia and describes the car as a beauty with a fun driving experience thanks to its upgraded 2.0L engine and 5-speed transmission. Others also admire the design, with @Slam105 noting it epitomizes pure Italian design and @JOP congratulating the current owner for owning such a beautiful Alfa. Photography is also highlighted positively by @OssoBene who appreciates the artful display of the Sprint.
Neutral: There are discussions around the specifics of the engine, with @jlglackin and @adamc clarifying confusion about the engine size; @adamc confirms it is a 2.0L, while @italcarguy provides additional technical details concerning the car's specifications. @carhillclimb and @watry engage in a technical conversation about components, such as oil filter placement and clutch setup, showing a depth of interest in the mechanics of the car. Multiple users point towards a possible misunderstanding in the car's description and suggest photographic and detailed clarifications be made in the listing.
Negative: Some comments point out issues that were overlooked in the listing. @Alfaman67 mentions paint bubbles in some areas, and @okie_flats criticizes the lack of key details in the auction listing. @mpatty notes that while the photography is impressive, it may misrepresent the car's color. @carhillclimb raises concerns about potential hack jobs in the car's components based on previous experiences, while @adamc points out mechanical errors he suggests should be corrected, indicating that further clarification is needed from the seller.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments highlight the vehicle's low mileage of just 11,000, with @jsa310 expressing excitement about its rarity, referring to it as a 'unicorn'. @Beans_Bacon also reflected on its beauty, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. The seller, @SeibelsClassics, assures potential buyers that the truck is well-preserved and authentic, noting that it is 'all original' and a true time capsule, as confirmed by @CarCowboy. The various bidders and commenters appreciate the vehicle's classic appeal and the nostalgic memories it evokes.
Neutral: @Maggie1822 inquired about the previous auction price, which the seller confirmed was $37,350, indicating interest in bidders who may have been involved before. @Hodge asked about original parts like the distributor cap and plug wires, to which the seller affirmed everything in the photos is included for potential buyers. The seller also provided backstory on the truck's history, mentioning that it was well taken care of before being sold.
Negative: Some comments raised skepticism regarding the integrity of bidder activity, with @palagogogone suggesting that a specific bidder only boosts bids during @SeibelsClassics events. The seller responded defensively, encouraging transparency and stating that the auction is on a no reserve basis and will sell regardless of circumstances. Additionally, @Chaps23 questioned whether the truck is entirely original after asking for confirmation about the paint, indicating that some bidders are seeking clarity on the authenticity of the vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dollycat3 commented on the vehicle, calling it a beauty, which suggests a favorable first impression. @Rockwhite praised the truck's appearance, mentioning it would nicely pull an Airstream, indicating its functionality and design appeal. The seller, @spld4, conveyed confidence in the truck's reliability, stating it is solid, stays cool, and drives well at highway speeds, further solidifying its positive attributes.
Neutral: The seller responded to inquiries about the vehicle's condition and history, providing clarifications about the paint's wear from a camper shell installation and addressing concerns about smoke smell, stating that it has not been smoked in. @dejis asked about the intake manifold gasket replacement, to which the seller explained that it was part of general maintenance procedures, though the specific reason was unclear. Additional requests for videos from @Hunterwally and @Esteban1 were met with the seller's assurance that more content would be available soon, including a previous driving video from an earlier auction.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition, including a request from @Hunterwally for videos highlighting any flaws like scratches or dings. The seller identified that aside from a wear mark on the rear bumper, there were no significant dings or dents, but also acknowledged the existence of some paint knicks. @67S3 noted the absence of a spare wheel or tire, which could be a point of concern for potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Jariztmendy, the seller, received positive feedback for the vehicle's performance and driving condition, indicating it has 'good bones' and is enjoyable to drive. @Nccrnina shared a personal connection to the vehicle, recalling their father's ownership in Costa Rica, which adds sentimental value to its story. The seller expressed enthusiasm about this connection and mentioned the car having received 'good love' in the past, underscoring its appeal to prospective buyers.
Neutral: @GLCTraveler raised several inquiries about the vehicle, including the absence of restoration records and the vehicle's overall condition. The seller provided detailed answers, noting that the previous restoration was more of a driver-quality refresh rather than a complete overhaul, which may appeal to buyers looking for a car that is not overly pristine but still functional. The seller also addressed concerns regarding the vehicle's components and modifications, indicating a willingness to assist and provide further information.
Negative: Some comments have pointed out visible signs of wear and tear on the vehicle, with @GLCTraveler stating that aspects of the BJ40, like surface rust and imperfections, suggest it did not undergo a thorough restoration as might have been expected. The seller acknowledged these issues, particularly mentioning that the top's sealing was poorly executed and that certain components had been removed by a previous owner. This raises potential concerns for buyers regarding the need for further maintenance or repairs.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Rorin67 described the vehicle as a 'Beautiful CVO Road King!' indicating a strong appreciation for its aesthetics, while @Kiddoskid19 expressed a long-standing admiration for the paint scheme, calling it the 'Best Harley design paint scheme ever!!' Additionally, @buellwinkle praised the bike as 'gorgeous,' emphasizing Harley's craftsmanship and wishing the future owner the best of luck with their purchase.
Neutral: @high_road, the seller, responded to @nvermet's query about the tires, stating that a new rear tire was installed in 2023 and that the front tire may be about a year older. The seller noted maintaining the tires well, offering to provide date codes for further information if needed. This demonstrates a commitment to transparency about the bike's condition.
Negative: @Wildbunch commented on the declining resale value of Harleys, reminiscing about a friend who lost $10,000 on a similar bike within four years, suggesting a significant depreciation in the Harley market. They also expressed concern over the motorcycle industry failing, implying that the overall market might not be in a favorable state, although they acknowledged that now might be a good time to buy a bike at a lower price.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @mlowengrub noted the vehicle remains gorgeous after all these years, complimenting its color. @Kevinbriem mentioned his appreciation for the car's beauty despite previous issues faced. @rickwestd shared his positive experiences with the car, stating it attracted attention and was well-regarded among car show attendees, highlighting its rarity and the enjoyment he found in ownership.
Neutral: @aegmotorsports provided detailed information about the vehicle, including its specifications, features, and history, emphasizing the modifications and maintenance performed to keep the car in top condition. The seller acknowledged the comments made by previous owners while addressing concerns about minor cosmetic imperfections and offering potential solutions. This suggests a willingness to be transparent and informative regarding the vehicle’s past and present condition.
Negative: @ZstngZ raised concerns about the interior's condition, noting past dash cracks and wear in the front seats which bothered him despite his admiration for the color. He expressed regret over the vehicle's superficial issues, especially considering its previous sales history. @rickwestd also questioned the need for repainting certain parts of the car, suggesting some inconsistencies in the vehicle's care and presentation over time.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The 2004 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0 5-Speed has received praise for its detailed documentation and well-maintained condition. @mspaulding88 commented on the thorough maintenance history from the previous owner, noting that it has been running flawlessly. Others have highlighted its good looks and the quality of the detailing, indicating that it appears clean and photogenic, which is supported by the seller’s commitment to showcasing the vehicle with a video tour and detailed photos.
Neutral: Comments reflect a mix of experiences with Jeep engines, with @oz0311 noting that he found the engines of his previous Wranglers to be reliable, often lasting over 220,000 miles with minimal issues. However, the conversation also uncovered concerns regarding engine reliability, with some users expressing surprise over the need for an engine replacement despite relatively low mileage of 85,000 at the last sale. Discussion around the tires included @DerkPerk's mention of mismatched tires, which some felt detracted from the vehicle's overall presentation but did not affect their interest.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about potential durability issues with Jeeps, particularly regarding engines and transmissions. @cas123 shared his negative experiences with clutch troubles and necessary engine replacements, emphasizing a trend of reliability problems in recent years. This sentiment was echoed by other users who expressed disappointment, as one had replaced an engine in their 2004 model, hinting that despite the Jeep's appealing appearance, there may be underlying issues with longevity and performance.
|
6.0L Vortec-Powered 1971 Chevrolet Chevelle Malibu Sport Coupe
136371R172776
Lot 199949
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @hefeweizen praised the vehicle's paint, highlighting that it fits the 71/72 model beautifully, and wished the seller good luck with the sale.
Neutral: @Tcbkelly, the seller, acknowledged @islandman42's concern about the disconnected windshield wiper motor and explained that the harness end was missing when the car was obtained, indicating a willingness to address the issue in the future.
Negative: @islandman42 expressed frustration regarding the disconnected windshield wiper motor, suggesting a lack of thoroughness in the vehicle's preparation for sale.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MPC_Concierge (The Seller) highlights the luxurious interior of the vehicle, particularly noting the comfort of the front seats and the effective ventilation system, which is appreciated during hot weather. @Cmorris1972 praises the car’s appearance and asks about the functioning of various components, indicating an interest in a car that operates well. The seller reassures potential buyers that all features, including the heads-up display and soft-close doors, are in working condition, enhancing the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @MPC_Concierge, provides information about the rear seats, clarifying that they do not recline and that there is a light stain on one seat that was slightly improved. @icecreamking99 expresses satisfaction with this update, showing that communication between the seller and interested parties is active. @Cmorris1972 raises additional questions about the vehicle's AC system, service history, and tire age, focusing on ensuring that the car is adequately maintained and operational.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's condition arise from multiple commenters, including @MIKEHARR1SON, who inquires about the state of the brakes and rotors, seeking clarity on whether they are original or replaced. @Dukedb2 voices apprehension about engine problems common to the model, like valve stem seals and timing chain issues, expressing a desire for insights that aren't easily found online. @meatspinner69 asks specifically about any wear on the rotors, indicating potential underlying issues that may worry prospective buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Moparmanbet described the car as magnificent, while @boaboyoz emphasized its impressive build and overall coolness, referring to it as a gem. @tlcamg and @Captainpua were also invited to check out the magnificence of the vehicle. Other positive remarks include @shelbysteve calling the Impala 'dead sexy,' and @Vaquero427 expressing admiration for the stock style interior. @Collins4A appreciated the ride-along experience, showing respect for the car's power, while @Stretch999 found the interior trim work beautiful and unique. Overall, the vehicle received considerable praise for its design and performance.
Neutral: @Moonshinerr inquired about the restoration details, specifically if it was a frame-off restoration and about the fuel injection system. @911r (The Seller) confirmed that it underwent a comprehensive frame-off restoration and addressed various technical questions regarding the vehicle. @dennis6605 sought clarification on certain parts found in the trunk, and @Stretch999 asked about the wiring under the dash, suggesting a focus on practicality and design choices. Additionally, @Carl1962 raised concerns regarding discrepancies between the cowl tag and the VIN, prompting @911r's explanation of the situation, maintaining transparency.
Negative: @Johnammond pointed out the lack of air conditioning despite the car's extensive modifications and remarked on the choices made during the build. @Trifiveron expressed disappointment about the interior color choice, finding it unattractive. @Carl1962 cited potential issues with the cowl tag discrepancies, identifying it as a 'bad sign.' Lastly, @Moonshinerr's request for photos of the body-off restoration revealed a lack of documentation, leaving some concerns unanswered.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express appreciation for the vehicle's unique features and condition. @dveitch08 noted the vehicle's modifications, while @GBRBiLL complimented the creative approach to the spring mounts. @DennisKing praised the soft dash and inventive use of barbells to prop up the carpet, showcasing a sense of humor about the vehicle's quirks. Overall, positive remarks highlight the car as a solid find for the right bidder, particularly due to its maintained condition and interesting aesthetic choices.
Neutral: The seller, @motts1970, is actively engaging with comments, answering questions about the vehicle's condition and features. They provide detailed responses, confirming there are no leaks and addressing concerns regarding the installation of parts and potential issues with the air suspension. They confirm the vehicle has a protective coating and is free of rust, assuring interested buyers about the vehicle's underlying condition. Additional photos of certain parts and features are being uploaded as requested, reflecting a commitment to transparency and customer service.
Negative: Some technical concerns were raised by commenters regarding the vehicle's modifications, notably @dveitch08 and @KevinK, who pointed out that the lower spring mounts and rear mud flaps are incorrectly installed. @Olsworth raised several critical questions about potential rust issues, engine cooling, and dashboard warning lights, indicating a lack of trust in the vehicle's reliability. Although @motts1970 addressed many questions, the presence of ongoing concerns about the modifications and functional issues may deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @TransAmDrifter shared a nostalgic memory of his high school girlfriend and acknowledged his enjoyment of the bike, adding that he owned one from 1982 to 1988. @bozzhogg recalled selling a similar bike to a buyer who took it on a long trip, emphasizing its reliability. Additionally, @Citabria98 expressed a deep appreciation for the XS400, discussing how it still looks great after years of use, and highlighting its classic design that resonated with him since he purchased it new in 1978.
Neutral: @ChristyRC (The Seller) mentioned she bought the bike to learn how to ride but realized it wasn't meant for her. In her comments, she clarified that the bike is not just a machine but something she wishes to pass to a good home. The seller also noted the connection to another bike she inherited from her father, explaining her journey into motorcycling in hopes of riding it one day without much success.
Negative: @Joe4702 shared a regretful story about his first motorcycle, which ended in a wreck after letting a friend borrow it, reflecting a common concern about bike safety. @acf2 questioned the seller's decision to sell the bike after acquiring another high-end motorcycle, suggesting inconsistency in her choices. This raised doubts about the seller's genuine intent, creating skepticism surrounding the sale.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @A7534 highlighted the vehicle's 6-speed transmission as being a rare and enjoyable feature to drive. @Dizzydean45 shared their enthusiasm for the Allroad, emphasizing its performance in challenging weather conditions, and noted the car's well-maintained status. Several commentors, including @GLWTA and @GDogg, expressed their appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic and overall appeal, with @Dizzydean45 deeming it to be in great shape and well cared for.
Neutral: @HJKH613, the seller, responded to various requests for information, including the vehicle's clutch and maintenance history, confirming that the clutch is original and in good condition. Multiple users, such as @hliu55 and @Tdub9966, inquired about functional aspects of the car like Bluetooth connectivity and radio details, indicating a general interest in the vehicle's modern conveniences. Other commentors, including @bogtrotter, were concerned with specific details like potential corrosion and requested pictures, reflecting a balance of interest and caution without strong emotional attachments.
Negative: Some users expressed frustration with the seller's communication style, specifically @bogtrotter, who pointed out that not responding to all inquiries could deter potential bidders. @ldl20 cautioned that effective communication is critical on auction platforms, urging the seller to engage more openly with questions. Additionally, concerns were raised by users like @zzracing regarding the verification of claims about components like the Arnott bags, emphasizing the importance of transparency in building trust with potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MasaRacecar, the seller, highlights the impressive features of the 2024 Jeep Gladiator Sport 4X4, which includes robust safety systems and advanced technologies. The seller confirms the availability of both key fobs and all original documentation, adding to the vehicle's appeal. Additionally, the seller assures potential bidders that the loan will be paid off prior to the auction's conclusion, promising that the title will be sent to the new owner promptly.
Neutral: Some comments raise valid questions about the listing, such as @MPETESS10 questioning the no-reserve auction approach given the vehicle's recent release and market performance. @Herder requests clarification regarding the lien and payment structure, seeking to understand the transaction's intricacies better. Other inquiries, like maintenance history from @Tylerdici, suggest that potential buyers are considering the vehicle's condition and paperwork carefully.
Negative: Concerns have been expressed regarding the clarity of the auction details, as @Herder finds the information about the bank owed confusing, potentially deterring some bidders. There is skepticism reflected in @MPETESS10's remark about the auction strategy, indicating doubts about the vehicle's marketability. Additionally, @Alan_k's confusion about the Carfax details also hints at potential transparency issues that could impact buyer confidence.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed strong nostalgia and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its classic appeal and connection to 80s culture. @RCMotor remarked on the car's unique charm with a hint of humor, while @Skylane182 shared fond memories associated with similar vehicles. Comments from @charleetuner and @Dodge_guy celebrated the car's luxurious features and its iconic status in film, emphasizing how it resonated with those who lived through that era.
Neutral comments focused on inquiries regarding the vehicle's features. @TDR was curious about the specific functionalities, such as the talking warning system, which indicates an interest in the technological aspect of the car. @Mrhoppy posed questions about the condition of the car, including whether the top was fully operational and if it was available for viewing and test drives. Although these inquiries were practical, they did not express a strong preference in either direction.
On the negative side, there were hints of dissatisfaction regarding the auction's communication process. @Mrhoppy pointed out a lack of responses from the seller, signaling frustration with the auction's management. This sentiment was echoed by @spokayman, who noticed a pattern of silence concerning the inquiries made. Overall, the comments revealed a mix of enthusiasm for the vehicle's history and style, tempered by concerns about the seller's engagement during the auction process.
Neutral: Commenters focused on inquiries regarding the vehicle's features. @TDR was curious about the specific functionalities, such as the talking warning system, which indicates an interest in the technological aspect of the car. @Mrhoppy posed questions about the condition of the car, including whether the top was fully operational and if it was available for viewing and test drives. Although these inquiries were practical, they did not express a strong preference in either direction.
Negative: @Mrhoppy pointed out a lack of responses from the seller, signaling frustration with the auction's management. This sentiment was echoed by @spokayman, who noticed a pattern of silence concerning the inquiries made. Overall, the comments revealed a mix of enthusiasm for the vehicle's history and style, tempered by concerns about the seller's engagement during the auction process.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Moducman (The Seller) reflects fondly on the experience with the Ducati, comparing its maintenance to that of a helicopter, emphasizing the meticulous care given to the bike. @Johnnyracer222 expresses confidence in the future desirability and value of this generation of Ducati models, suggesting that interested buyers should act quickly. @jsadamski and @Steward praise the bike's aesthetics and performance, with @Steward noting the incredible sound of the open Termignioni exhaust and acknowledging the bike as a rider's machine that's well-used yet well-maintained.
Neutral: @Dheffel1 inquires about some specific repairs needed for the Ducati, including concerns about the controls and fairing damage. @Moducman (The Seller) responds thoroughly, explaining that the control issue is minor and doesn’t affect functionality, while clarifying that the fairing damage is cosmetic and caused by regular riding. There is also mention of the bidding process as it approaches the end, and arrangements for pickup are offered to the winning bidder.
Negative: There are minor concerns raised by @Dheffel1 regarding the bike's condition, such as the fast idle control issue and the abrasion on the fairing. @Dheffel1 asks whether the tape applied on the fairing indicates underlining damage, which suggests potential apprehension about the bike's overall state despite @Moducman (The Seller)'s reassurances. Shipping also becomes a topic of concern, with @Mordecai suggesting alternatives, hinting that logistics might complicate the auction process.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @alaninvancouver praised the vehicle for being tastefully done, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @stugottz remarked on the Mustang’s cleanliness and noted the presence of many awesome upgrades, suggesting that the car has been well-maintained and enhanced over time. @Jetman1, the seller, confirmed that the car runs strong and stays around 170 degrees, providing further assurance of its mechanical reliability.
Neutral: @thegarvinclan inquired about the presence of the original c-code, 2 barrel 289, indicating an interest in the vehicle's historical elements. @bigwings asked whether any work had been done to the engine, suggesting a need for clarity on its condition and history. @KennyST requested a cold startup video, expressing an interest in seeing the vehicle in action as part of assessing its functionality.
Negative: @davek1661 mentioned that if the car does have the original c-code, it would be the only original piece left, implying that much of the vehicle may have been altered or replaced. @Jetman1 responded to inquiries about the engine's history, admitting that he does not know exactly what has been done beyond what is documented, which might raise concerns for potential buyers about the vehicle's authenticity and the extent of modifications.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @newcarpro highlights a comprehensive feature set for the 2012 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon, mentioning its 4-wheel drive capabilities, advanced safety features like electronic stability control and hill start assist, and comfort options such as heated seats and air conditioning. The vehicle's robust construction, including its heavy-duty axles and off-road performance capabilities, is praised. The aesthetic appeal of the monolithic design, including tinted windows and stylish badges, contributes positively to the overall perception of the vehicle.
Neutral: Some commenters are expressing curiosity about the specifics of the vehicle, such as the stereo system's Bluetooth capabilities and whether there have been any modifications like re-gearing or speedometer recalibration, indicating a need for further information. @Dorsea mentions that the vehicle isn't receiving much attention, suggesting an awareness of market interest, which may reflect on its current desirability or pricing.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the maintenance and functionality of the vehicle, with questions about potential problems and whether all systems are operating correctly. The inquiry into tire size and specific adjustments indicates skepticism about the vehicle’s readiness for serious off-road use. There's an underlying tone of caution among some commenters, suggesting that interested buyers should thoroughly investigate the vehicle's condition before proceeding.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Carunch expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, indicating a strong affection for it and hinting that it would appeal to their wife as well. @papadahlgren (The Seller) shares excitement about the car's vibrant "fire cracker red" color, noting its timely relevance for the 4th of July. @kingkarmann appreciates the vehicle's durability and quality, mentioning good details like the condition of the top and boot, and the solidness of the Ghia overall, while also highlighting the reliable performance of the aftermarket 1776cc engine.
Neutral: @papadahlgren (The Seller) provides insights into the car's performance, mentioning that it has been driven multiple times on an approximately 70-mile highway drive and kept in a garage during winter. @kingkarmann brings attention to the potential history of the vehicle, noting that the A/C that was there originally is no longer functional as the internal parts were removed to create more cockpit space. The comments suggest an acknowledgment of the retrofitting history of the car but do not make assertive claims about its authenticity.
Negative: Despite the positive praises, there are remarks that imply deficiencies or concerns. @kingkarmann notes that there is only an 'adequate quarter pan patch' installed on the driver's side floor, suggesting a minor issue with the vehicle's integrity. @Ghiaride points out a potential discrepancy with the upholstery pattern compared to the original model year, hinting at possible modifications that could raise questions about the car's authenticity. Overall, there is a hint that while the car has positive attributes, there are also aspects that could be improved, especially with paint correction suggested by @kingkarmann.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The car is a modified 57 Thunderbird that has been carefully maintained and presents well visually, showing a bright, shiny color without significant fading. The interior is described as clean and bright, and all lighting components function properly. The owner, @Tcope49, expresses a nostalgic attachment to the vehicle, highlighting its performance modifications that were popular in the 60s, and notes that despite some mechanical issues, the engine runs strong and clean, making it a potential fun drive for a future owner. Commenters like @ddlyle appreciate the car's hotrod potential with some minor upgrades, suggesting it could be ready to go with proper adjustments.
Neutral: Some commenters raise practical questions about the vehicle's features and functionality. @thunderbirdsnw inquires about the operational status of parts like the windshield washer and expresses assumptions about the car's lack of power steering and brake assist, while @corvettom9 asks about other non-working components. @Tcope49 provides insights on the car's history, maintenance, and current state, such as the presence of some surface rust and the fact that some original equipment may or may not be present. There are also discussions regarding the car's hardtop and porthole windows, with various opinions offered by commenters like @birddoc and @pr10r.
Negative: Several comments highlight the mechanical issues the vehicle is experiencing, particularly related to the transmission that slips out of second and third gears. @tdub59 and @Bardan explore the potential causes and necessary repairs, suggesting that the transmission may require a rebuild, which could be costly. There are concerns about the reliability and associated costs of repairs discussed by @gocorcoran and @stugottz, emphasizing the challenges of sourcing expertise for such repairs. Ultimately, there is a cautious sentiment around the car's condition, leading to questions about how these factors will affect bidding, as mentioned by @Tcope49.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Branjas2 shared their experience with the vehicle, noting that they successfully pulled a trailer with a sit-down roller for asphalt paving side jobs in the early 1990s without encountering any issues. This suggests that the vehicle has a solid towing capability, at least based on their past use.
Neutral: @tokeekee18 inquired about the tow capacity of the bumper/hitch combo, indicating a general interest in the vehicle's towing capabilities. However, @Branjas2, while providing some context about their experience, also mentioned uncertainty regarding the specific tow capacity. JMart56 asked about fluid leaks mentioned in the description and the shifting difficulty of the truck before it warms up, indicating they are gathered information about potential mechanical issues.
Negative: @JMart56 raised concerns regarding fluid leaks and difficulties in shifting the truck, which could indicate potential mechanical problems that need to be addressed. Additionally, @Bobzluvsoldcars questioned whether the 'Ford' logo on the tailgate had been painted over since the photos were taken, suggesting doubts about the authenticity or current condition of the vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments praising the vehicle highlight its impressive performance and desirability among enthusiasts. @GeeToeTiger remarked on the car's incredible capabilities, especially in skilled hands, while @Ronson68L78 shared a thrilling personal story about the car's speed. Many commenters, including @Vtec4ever, expressed their preference for this model over newer versions, indicating a strong appreciation for the ZR1's design and engineering. @Barryward called it 'cool and new', and further comments emphasized the car's fun-driving potential, with @09zo6pj noting the joy of driving such a vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments addressed technical aspects and logistics surrounding the auction and vehicle details. @casciomotors provided vital information about tire date codes and the vehicle's no-reserve status, assuring bidders that the car will sell to the highest bidder. Commenters like @Buckwheat2710 speculated about previous ownership and tire choices, indicating an awareness of the car's history and condition. Moreover, various users pointed out potential minor flaws, such as dash bubbling—mentioned by @Vahe1990 and @Jdcurare—but acknowledged that such issues could be manageable if properly addressed.
Negative: Negative sentiments focused primarily on concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly issues like dash bubbling. @Vahe1990 and @Jdcurare noted possible bubbling in the dash, a recognized issue with Corvette models from that era. Additionally, some commenters calculated the vehicle's depreciation and raised concerns about the tire condition, as @MartyKC lamented that the price was already beyond their budget. There was also skepticism about the utility of the tires with regard to their age and tread life as pointed out by @ZionRyan. Overall, while the ZR1 is widely admired, these issues have sparked dialogue about its maintenance and potential repair costs.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ChiefPontiaxe highlights that the 300ZX is a thrilling car to drive, well-crafted yet often overlooked, emphasizing the strong community of owners available online. @zdoctor shares their experience owning multiple 300ZXs, noting the car's longevity with proper maintenance, and praises the vehicle's condition—particularly its above-average interior for its age. @BennyFazio reminisces about the era of 1984 when the Z31 was new, expressing admiration for its practicality with back seats and appreciating its nostalgic patina.
Neutral: There are some practical notes regarding the 300ZX's condition and potential improvements. @Number_Six suggests either minor paint work or simply enjoying the existing patina, while @VH1 seeks clarification on specific features such as the air conditioning performance, any hidden leaks, and the possibility of a driving video. @MikeGoulet (The Seller) confirms the absence of rust, the car's well-maintained status with original parts, and mentions the potential issue with the air conditioning not blowing as cold as expected.
Negative: Conversely, there are some concerns raised about the vehicle's cosmetic condition, particularly the faded paint on the bumpers noted by @MikeGoulet (The Seller). Potential buyers might view the faded appearance and the age of the car as drawbacks. Furthermore, although @MikeGoulet provides reassurance about the car's maintenance and quality, the possibility of the AC issue may deter some prospective buyers who prioritize performance or comfort features.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @2hecknback praised the vehicle, describing it as impressive off-pavement and a great option for camping at collector meet-ups. @Eastatx also expressed enthusiasm, calling the vehicle awesome and inquiring about its highway readiness for a long drive. Additionally, @jneuenburg provided useful information about military vehicle clubs across North America, suggesting that the organized MV hobby could encourage others to consider purchasing an ex-military vehicle.
Neutral: @Waterdawg2004 asked practical questions regarding the vehicle’s height and the process of importing it into the US. @agincourt, the Seller, clarified that vehicles over 25 years old or built in the USA have no issue with being imported back. The discussion also included insights from @jneuenburg regarding local military vehicle clubs and events where enthusiasts can gather, swap parts, and share experiences about maintaining military vehicles.
Negative: @LazyTrailorTrash raised a concern about the tires having red paint and questioned whether these trucks originally featured a 24V system, to which @jneuenburg confirmed they did. Furthermore, @Eastatx, while excited about the vehicle, expressed uncertainty about its capability for a long drive, indicating some doubts about its practicality. Overall, the dialogue revealed a mix of curiosity and caution regarding the vehicle's features and suitability.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @E28E34 highlights the rarity of the unmodified 93 325is and appreciates its beautiful color, stating it is a welcome sight that brings back fond memories of driving a similar car in the early 2000s. @TracksuitAL admires the vehicle's low mileage of only 80k and refers to it as a stunning time capsule, while @nesormj3 shares a nostalgic connection by recalling how he owned a twin of this model, acknowledging the car's fantastic appearance. @Niedermohr also expresses nostalgic feelings toward the BMW brand, remembering his own experiences with an earlier model and noting how this car looks like a good companion for his collection.
Neutral: The seller, @Sloocrk, provides insights about the vehicle, detailing their ownership experience of less than 50 miles over a year and emphasizing its excellent condition and lack of rust. They also comment on the model's driving experience and wish they could keep it, stating that they purchased it from a dealer after it was originally owned for over 31 years by one owner. @standretty inquires about details regarding an accident the car had in 1995, while @gaspo2180 shares practical features of the vehicle, indicating its versatile design and usability for carrying larger items.
Negative: @standretty's inquiry about the accident raises concerns regarding the vehicle's history, which @Sloocrk attempts to mitigate by stating they were unaware of the incident until checking the CarFax report. The mention of the accident could influence potential buyers, leading them to seek more detailed information. Though the seller reassures that the original owner maintained it well post-accident, the overshadowing concern might deter some interested parties.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many users have expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its aesthetic appeal and enjoyable driving experience. @NapaCab praises the car for being fun to drive, noting that although it's not the fastest or priciest in their collection, it is certainly the most entertaining. @professorgearhead shares a positive experience with @dgclassiccars, saying that the seller provided exemplary after-sales service while helping them acquire their Fulvia. These testimonials emphasize the car's charm and the seller's dedication to customer satisfaction.
Neutral: The seller, @dgclassiccars, has provided details that may interest potential buyers, such as the recent restoration of the Fiat Jolly and its elegant design featuring extended wicker throughout, including the floor. They also mention that worldwide shipping can be handled for new owners. This information presents a straightforward overview of what buyers might expect regarding the vehicle's condition and purchasing logistics.
Negative: There are no notable negative comments or concerns mentioned about the vehicle or the seller in the provided comments. The overall sentiment leans towards positive experiences and appreciation, indicating a general satisfaction with both the vehicle's attributes and the seller's services.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, noting its beauty and excellent presentation. @drbarks referred to the Cayenne Coupe as 'beautiful' and in 'very nice shape.' @FJbuckets also expressed admiration, calling it 'What a beaut.' Additionally, @icecreamking99 appreciated the auction by @Wob, emphasizing the exceptional quality and sorting of the cars presented. @99NCNSX acknowledged the fine presentation of the vehicle, indicating a high level of trust in the seller's work.
Neutral: @Howmanyis2many clarified the seating configuration of the Cayenne Coupe, explaining the standard four-seat layout and optional five-seat addition, thus addressing a question raised by @Vc455. @Wob (The Seller) provided further insights into the vehicle’s features and specifications, detailing the lengthy care it received and encouraging bidders to participate in the auction process. This included tips on viewing and bidding and general information on how to engage in the auction effectively.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition. @99NCNSX noticed that the 'check engine' light was illuminated in one of the photos, prompting clarification from @Wob (The Seller) who explained that it was expected while the engine was not running. This highlight of potential concern contrasted with the generally positive comments and raised questions regarding the car's mechanical status, despite assurances from the seller about its long-term care.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the exceptional quality and rarity of the 2005 Cadillac Escalade EXT, with @SeibelsClassics, the seller, emphasizing its low mileage of just 1,800 miles and pristine condition. Commenters such as @CRUSH and @Dean_Laumbach express excitement about the auction, noting that it represents a unique opportunity to own a 'like new' vehicle and the 'best of the best' in the GM truck lineup. There are also remarks like those from @Mike11357, who recognizes the vehicle's beauty and potential value, adding a positive tone about the auction's outcome.
Neutral: Several comments provide a balanced perspective, acknowledging the Escalade EXT's esteemed placement in classic automotive culture without outright endorsements. For instance, @johnnyvett shares a preference for a different generation of the vehicle but still appreciates its uniqueness and color. Meanwhile, @Hunter42 raises a query about the re-listing of the vehicle, seeking clarity on its condition—this question seems to be a point of curiosity rather than skepticism about the vehicle itself.
Negative: There are some doubts raised about the vehicle's relisting, particularly from @Hunter42, who questions whether there are underlying issues with the truck given its previous auction history. The question implies concerns regarding transparency about the vehicle's condition which could deter some potential bidders. Nonetheless, @SeibelsClassics responds reassuringly, affirming that the vehicle is in excellent condition and simply seeking its rightful place in a collection.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dollycat3 described the vehicle as a "great one owner beauty", highlighting its appeal. @grizz5656 (The Seller) expressed appreciation for the positive feedback and emphasized the truck's reliability, recounting experiences over 40 years, including pulling a tent trailer and hunting trips without issue. @MSgt-Ret praised the vehicle's current condition, stating it is only just getting broken in, reinforcing its longevity, while @Fitzroya offered admiration for the truck's impressive history and wished luck in the auction.
Neutral: @dp726 inquired about the absence of air conditioning, to which @grizz5656 (The Seller) explained that it was a choice made years ago due to budget constraints. Concerns about the vehicle's rust were raised, with @destrukt0 asking for pictures of any repairs. @grizz5656 reassured potential buyers that the repairs were minimal, using protective measures to avoid major issues. The conversation also touched upon frame condition, with @glypis questioning potential rust problems, and @grizz5656 replying that the frame remains intact with no rust issues.
Negative: Some comments indicated skepticism about the truck's overall condition due to rust concerns, with @glypis and @dvolpe55 pointing out the history of frame rust in Toyota pickups. @dvolpe55 shared personal experience with frame issues in his own truck, cautioning potential buyers to be aware of such problems. @dp726 expressed frustration with bidding errors, assigning blame to the bidding process itself, while @loucdup admitted to accidental bidding on this truck, which he described as unprofessional, though @bringatrailer clarified the policy on bid retraction.
|
14k-Mile 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL63 AMG AMG P30 Performance Package
WDDJK7EA8DF018053
Lot 199899
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments highlight the positive aspects of the SL63 being sold by @Gryphon12, praising it as a beautiful example of a luxury vehicle. @WisdomFirst compliments the well-done walk-around videos and also mentions it as a nice SL example, while @Rauapollo appreciates it as a great seller's offering. Additionally, @mk500kowalski shares a positive personal experience, mentioning satisfaction with a previous purchase from @Gryphon12 and expressing enthusiasm for potentially buying another AMG in the future.
Neutral: A few commenters touch upon logistical and informational aspects of the auction without showing strong emotional leanings. @p-38 raises a question about why two services occurred within a short time frame, seeking clarification on the vehicle's maintenance history. @Jcar17 asks for the window sticker and MSRP, indicating an interest in specific vehicle details. Overall, these comments focus on inquiries and factual aspects rather than subjective opinions.
Negative: There are some negative remarks regarding the vehicle, particularly from @cvg123, who posted a comment flagged as non-constructive, expressing a concern about the authenticity of @Gryphon12's claims on the car's quality. @cottrd criticizes the price of the car, suggesting it may not reflect its actual value. Furthermore, @cvg123 admits that their earlier comments were crude and acknowledges the potential difference in views on the vehicle, indicating skepticism about the sale price being justified.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @4byFreak (The Seller) presents the 2013 GMC Sierra 1500 Z71 4x4 as an exceptional vehicle, labeling it a true time capsule based on its pristine condition. The undercarriage is described as spotless, with only minimal signs of wear, demonstrating that the truck has been well-preserved. There are no scratches on the exterior, and the paint appears to have been meticulously maintained, likely only treated with wax throughout its life. The seller asserts that the vehicle could easily be mistaken for one with significantly fewer miles, underscoring its impressive care and quality.
Neutral: Commenters have inquired about specific features of the vehicle, including its bed size, to which @IndyCat confirmed it measures 5.5 feet in length. The seller reiterated that they had removed the factory plastic bedliner solely for the purpose of showcasing the untouched condition of the truck's bed. They have indicated their willingness to reinstall the bedliner before the auction's end if the buyer desires.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive portrayal of the truck by @4byFreak (The Seller), there are concerns regarding a known safety recall involving the passenger-side frontal airbag inflator, due to possible degradation from humidity and temperature. While the seller emphasizes the pristine physical condition of the vehicle, potential buyers may need to consider the implications of this recall and its required repairs, which could impact the overall purchase decision.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @JosephAuto praises the vehicle for its low mileage of only 34K, appreciating its top-down beauty, while @wkcole (The Seller) expresses gratitude for the compliment, agreeing that it indeed stands out. @wkcole also mentions the vehicle's original glossy paint and proper care, indicating that it has been garaged its entire life. Furthermore, he reassures potential buyers that the air conditioning and stereo sound functionality are excellent, as he encourages insightful commentary regarding the vehicle.
Neutral: Multiple commenters, including @AlfapaulCT and @vettefan67, seek additional details about the vehicle's convertible top, requesting close-up pictures and specifics about its manual operation. @wkcole provides clarification about the convertible top, explaining the manual latch process and confirming that the factory boot for the top is included. He also acknowledges the concern regarding the headrest motors and emphasizes the importance of full disclosure about the vehicle's condition and history.
Negative: On the other hand, some comments reflect concerns about repairs and operational issues. @JYates3 questions why the convertible top does not function fully, while @H2ODoc shares a previous negative experience regarding hydraulic issues with a similar model. Additionally, @Hondacb400fman inquires about the reason for the sale after such a short ownership period, hinting at potential red flags. @wkcole responds candidly, disclosing personal medical challenges that have affected his decision to sell, which raises further context around the vehicle's availability.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive condition and features. @colorfinger noted how sharp the car looks compared to their own model, while @sjgnyc praised its stunning color. @moys81 (The Seller) received positive feedback for presenting the first 4th-generation Outback on Bring a Trailer, with @oxmead agreeing that well-maintained 3.6R models will only increase in desirability. @Unclbnz shared their love for their 3.6R, indicating it's a great vehicle for mountainous conditions, which adds to the positivity surrounding this particular model.
Neutral: Several comments engaged in discussions about the sale, including the specifics of the dealer fee. @tdwilliams and others highlighted that the fee is lower than typical dealer charges, and @Outlogged mentioned that other dealers charge significantly higher fees. Some participants were curious about specifics, like whether the sale was private or through a dealer, showing an interest in the process rather than the vehicle itself. @Boulderman had questions regarding specific dashboard indicators and sound system details, which added more context to the inquiries without leaning toward negative or overly positive sentiments.
Negative: There were few negative comments, but concerns regarding the dealer fee arose from a few users. @Undertaker expressed that the additional $75 fee could be a deal-breaker for them, while @tdwilliams mentioned that some dealers manage to sell without charging any fee at all, potentially suggesting the fee was unwarranted. @Littlehorse shared an experience of needing extra oil between changes, which some might view as a minor reliability concern, although the overall commentary on the vehicle remains largely positive.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the unique Studebaker Panel Wagon, with @H20cycle noting how glad they are that it was rescued, calling it a cool offering. @Valiantjim finds it interesting and unique, highlighting the exceptional quality of the build and attention to detail. @rickaz and @Falconer1024 comment positively on the vehicle's attractiveness and execution, with @rickaz encouraging buyers to take pride in owning a distinctive model not commonly seen in neighborhoods.
Neutral: Several members seek more information and clarification about the vehicle's features. @broodie asks about the back seat's functionality and requests better pictures of the dashboard and controls. @tjkdk points out a potential discrepancy regarding the rear differential size in the pictures, asking for closer images or confirmation. @NortEdward questions the vehicle's drivability for a longer trip, while @Powerflow6 inquires about the engine type, specifically the 302 V8.
Negative: Some comments reflect uncertainty and a lack of clarity regarding certain features of the vehicle. @broodie expresses frustration with the initial lack of responses from the seller, @mkifferdomba, about specific inquiries. This leads to some confusion about the vehicle's elements and the seller’s engagement in providing necessary information, causing a minor hindrance to potential buyers who may seek assurance before making a purchase.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments highlight the vehicle as a wonderful ride, with various enthusiasts praising its vintage appeal and historical significance. @Rockabillykid describes it as a wonderful ride, while @mark_99 emphasizes the car's rarity and its connection to iconic figures like Hollywood stars and Rock 'n Rollers. @GDogg notes the vehicle's prestigious family ownership history, suggesting it will offer great opportunities to its next owner. @TheOMDude adds that it is aesthetically superior to the next model year, enhancing its desirability. @Tyler_of_wisco (The Seller) shares the car's rich history, detailing its restoration and previous ownership, which adds to its charm and character.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the vehicle's condition and maintenance needs without expressing strong positive or negative sentiments. @DocMGL mentions that the car requires some tender loving care, suggesting potential color updates and improvements. @CaddyLou raises practical questions about the interior materials and history, showing genuine interest in specifications and performance. @Tyler_of_wisco (The Seller) engages with potential buyers by answering these questions and providing further insights into the restoration process and car's current state, including clarifications on rust and interior quality.
Negative: There are hints of concern regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly related to rust and its needs for repair. @cruzahome questions the presence of rust, while @CaddyLou requests additional documentation of the restoration, implying there may be doubts about the car's integrity. @cruzahome also pushes for a evaluation of the chrome condition, pointing out that good chrome is expensive to restore, highlighting potential economic concerns for future restoration. Overall, while there is admiration for the car, the comments indicate that it requires attention and may pose challenges for new owners.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Bubbalancia fondly recalls their father's vehicle from the late 1970s, expressing nostalgic feelings about the model and sharing pleasant memories of their experiences with it. They highlight the utility of the vehicle for family outings and sports like skiing, ultimately wishing good luck to the future buyer. Similarly, @R56JCW shares their long-term enjoyment of owning a 1977 model for nearly 20 years, appreciating the attention it receives and the joy it brings despite needing restoration due to environmental factors. The community sentiment towards the vehicle is generally warm and nostalgic, suggesting it holds significant value to many owners and enthusiasts.
Neutral: @JoshS1979 (The Seller) provides clarifications about the vehicle's seating configuration, confirming that both front seats lean forward to allow access to the back seat. This detail addresses potential buyers' concerns about the practicality of the vehicle in terms of accommodating passengers. Additionally, they clarify that the vehicle comes with only a bikini top, indicating that it offers a summer-oriented design with minimal coverings, which may appeal to buyers looking for a fun, open-air driving experience.
Negative: @BltByKrmn expresses concern over the number of times the vehicle has changed hands, suggesting that it may indicate underlying issues or a lack of reliability. @PontiacNut comments on the seat functionality, noting that the specific seat model did not fold forwards, providing a critical perspective on the vehicle's design limitations. There is also a mention from @Griff66 asking if the vehicle includes a hard top, which raises questions about the type of protection offered, alongside @Bubbalancia's response that it never originally came with one, which could be viewed as a downside for buyers seeking more options for their vehicles.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express enthusiasm for the vehicle's condition and specifications. @NextGenCC, the seller, highlights the car's pristine paint and interior, indicating it has been well cared for throughout its history in Texas. @ToyTommy mentions the rarity of the manual transmission in an L-type, praising the overall appearance of the car. Commenters share a deeper appreciation for the model, noting its distinctive color and sharp presentation, affirming that this Supra deserves a caring new owner.
Neutral: Several individuals ask logistical questions about the vehicle's features. @7secstreetGT inquires about the functionality of the air conditioning, while @IceShanty requests pictures of the lights operating. The seller, @NextGenCC, responds promptly, confirming that the A/C has been converted to R134 and mentions that he shows the lights in his video, indicating a willingness to engage with potential buyers and upgrade the listing with additional information as needed.
Negative: There are few criticisms or negative comments regarding the vehicle. @7secstreetGT and others bring up concerns about specific features, like the air conditioning system's refrigerant type and proper functioning. While these queries are not outright negative, they imply a need for clarity on the car's maintenance and usability, suggesting that potential buyers may seek more assurance regarding the vehicle's operational condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters praised specific features of the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and quality. @Roger911 noted the clean installation of the front bumper and appreciated the OEM wheels being wider than those offered in other trims. @Judoki mentioned the maintenance of the vehicle, with regular oil changes every 3,000 miles and no issues encountered, emphasizing the reliability of Toyota vehicles. @meh60 provided a reassuring perspective on the oil change frequency, suggesting that if high-quality synthetic oil is used, longer intervals could be acceptable and confirmed that there are service records indicating the vehicle is well cared for.
Neutral: There were some requests for additional information and details regarding the vehicle's condition. Commenters like @carstruck expressed the need for more photos of the frame and body mounts to assess potential corrosion, while @WGibson inquired about service records beyond what was provided in the CarFax report. @IL_Rod showed interest in whether additional accessories, such as the Shark vacuum, were included in the bidding for the vehicle. The seller @Judoki acknowledged these requests and promised to provide more images upon their return, displaying a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle’s service history, particularly by @AntMD, who questioned the frequency of oil changes done by the previous owner and inquired about the engine's health. @meh60 countered this concern by stating that with proper synthetic oil, longer intervals might not be harmful, but the topic sparked a debate about oil change practices. Additionally, buyers like @milk_mane and @dmathias93 expressed uncertainty about specific features such as KDSS and called for more comprehensive undercarriage photos, indicating some dissatisfaction with the provided information.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express nostalgia and enthusiasm for the 1978 Ford Mustang II King Cobra, highlighting its authenticity and rarity. @CJC0803 calls it the 'Holy Grail of Mustang IIs,' while @anfojo shares plans to modify it with a Ford 3.5 Ecoboost engine to enhance its performance, showing excitement for the potential of the vehicle. @Mg78 (The Seller) emphasizes the car's impressive condition, claiming it is rust-free and has a great paint job, which makes it stand out from comparable models. Additionally, @DKeng recalls fond memories of the Mustang II, appreciating how rare they are today, especially the King Cobras, which were produced in limited quantities.
Neutral: Commenters also bring up practical details about the vehicle, such as the air conditioning's functionality. @JonathanDMiller questions whether the AC works, and @Mg78 (The Seller) confirms that it is intact but does not blow cold air. Several comments discuss the car's history, with @buzzwells providing reassurance about its authenticity after researching the VIN. @sliproc mentions the rarity of counterfeit King Cobras, implying that the likelihood of this being a fake is low due to the effort involved and the car's value. Furthermore, @Tonkatoy1 inquires about the title, which @Mg78 (The Seller) explains is not available due to the car's age and registration processes.
Negative: On the downside, there are concerns about the condition and aesthetics of the car. @jkws raises suspicions about various 'questionable items' in the photos, mentioning items like upside-down step plates and poorly aligned body panels, which cast doubt on the vehicle's upkeep. @CDehne questions @anfojo's plan to install a new engine, arguing that the original 302 can be modified for sufficient power while maintaining reliability, suggesting that any changes may detract from the vehicle's value. Furthermore, the overall sentiment from some commenters reflects skepticism regarding the true desirability and performance of vehicles from this era, capturing a sense of ambivalence surrounding the car's market potential.
|
556-Mile 2023 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Coupe 3LZ 70th Anniversary Edition
1G1YF2D39P5700431
Lot 199935
Dealer
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @skonker appreciates the aesthetic appeal of the 2023 Corvette Z06, remarking on its beautiful design and likening the red line wheels to an old-school Hot Wheels car. @Rubenalmazan feels that the car is still worth its price, even with a warranty issue. @getyourfreakon describes the vehicle as beautiful and notes its simple options as appealing, suggesting it could be a bargain for the right buyer willing to take a risk.
Neutral: @newcarpro provides relevant delivery details, including the vehicle's VIN and specifications, while also mentioning a warranty block due to a missed retention policy guideline. @JHBBII and @RaceGP1 discuss the implications of the warranty restriction in the market, noting its potential impact on resale and overall buyer uncertainty. @jtimmons1197 questions whether the car is equipped with a front axle lift, while @badcad mentions the availability of similar models in the market, alluding to the competitive landscape.
Negative: @Vyper340 expresses concern over the warranty block, suggesting that its presence could significantly affect the vehicle's price, especially given the market saturation. @F92S63M8 shares worries about the aging interior materials, while @Racole32 recounts previous issues with Z06 models when driven without warranty coverage, asserting a preference for a car with warranty protection. @prof_x believes the price is already too high for a vehicle with a warranty block, reflecting a broader skepticism among potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @WJB40771 commented on the vehicle's aesthetics, expressing appreciation for its appearance, stating it looks very nice. @Pubecanoe also praised his own 2007 model in matte black, mentioning its eye-catching design and performance as an amazing ride, highlighting the unique features such as the large rear tire that stands out at local biker gatherings.
Neutral: @DWahl, the seller, provided insights regarding the vehicle's fuel gauge issues, noting that it works intermittently which could indicate a possible connection problem. He also mentioned that shipping options should be available for the vehicle and that the muffler will ship separately, addressing potential buyer concerns about logistics.
Negative: There is concern about the fuel gauge not functioning consistently, with @WJB40771 inquiring about the specific problem. @DWahl indicated uncertainty about the cause, which might deter potential buyers worried about reliability and troubleshooting needed in the future.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Fredmay13 (The Seller) provides a strong assurance about the vehicle's condition, emphasizing it is a garage-kept, low-mileage Honda CRV that has been owned in California its entire life. He expresses confidence in the car's mechanical soundness and assures potential buyers that any concerns regarding visuals like glare or dirt will be clarified. The seller is engaged and willing to accommodate requests for additional pictures and videos, indicating a proactive approach to customer satisfaction and transparency.
Neutral: Comments from users such as @GLWA, @willy, and @Tx2525 raise inquiries about specific vehicle details, including potential undercarriage condition and the quality of the AC output. While they express curiosity about the car's imperfections and clarify visual aspects, these inquiries do not convey strong negativity or positivity but rather seek additional information. The seller responds to these queries with clarifications and further insights, maintaining a positive interaction.
Negative: Comments from @citruscove and @LowBoy1der highlight concerns about visible signs of damage, such as a 'bubbled' door panel and potential rust under the sub-frame. These points suggest that while the seller assures a solid condition, some buyers remain skeptical about the vehicle's overall integrity due to its age and minor observable flaws. The seller addresses these criticisms by stating that observed imperfections are typical for a vehicle of this age but acknowledges that the car could benefit from cleaning and detailing.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @SMB85 calling it a beauty and stating love for everything about the car. @eclecticars, who owns a Business Coupe version, praised the car's easy drivability and spectacular design, highlighting its attractive big headlamps. @Undertaker referred to it as gorgeous and understated, loving the original mohair interior and noting its rarity as a Country Club coupe. @Ypss36 described the car as a stunner and wished they could make room for it.
Neutral: Several comments included practical information and observations about the Buick. For instance, @classicworldtrade (The Seller) acknowledged a mistake in a previous video regarding the type of brakes, and addressed inquiries from potential buyers, such as @Jrbmk2 wanting to view the car. Commenters like @CalvadaKing defended the vehicle's condition against criticisms, while @classicworldtrade provided explanations about the headlight adjustment and confirmed the absence of a radio.
Negative: Criticism arose regarding certain aspects of the vehicle's condition. @Buickrestrr pointed out issues with the headlights and tail light, questioning the quality of the undercarriage work and referring to the vehicle as a "flipper maximus." In contrast, @CalvadaKing suggested that the issues mentioned were easily fixable and acknowledged that the undercarriage appeared better detailed than suspected. Overall, while some concerns were raised, they contrasted with the majority of positive feedback.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Buildnh provided a touching backstory about the truck, revealing its connection to the seller's family spanning over 40 years. The truck was originally purchased by the seller's brother, who tragically passed away shortly after, making the vehicle a cherished family heirloom. The comment emphasizes the emotional value of the truck and how it has been well cared for by the family, which adds to its appeal for potential buyers.
Neutral: @CarinNH (The Seller) responded to inquiries from @557Buck and @VTDavid regarding the truck's specifications and history. She confirmed that it is a long bed model, has lived at the same address since 1988, and underwent a repaint in 2018 with minimal body work done. She also acknowledged the presence of a small discoloration on the truck bed while clarifying that the truck has not been inspected this year but stated there have been no issues during previous inspections.
Negative: @VTDavid expressed some concerns about a rust spot on the truck, questioning its location and suggesting that it could be problematic for a vehicle of its age. He noted that an inspection would be beneficial, especially given the truck's vintage status, indicating that there are some uncertainties about the truck's condition that a potential buyer would need to consider before making a purchase.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm about the 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK350 Launch Edition, with the seller @tgperformance providing detailed information and being responsive to inquiries. They highlight the vehicle's impressive mileage of only 20K miles, which adds to its appeal. Additionally, @tgperformance shares videos showcasing the car's driving capabilities and features, which are appreciated by potential bidders.
Neutral: There are several inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition, including questions about oil leaks from @josechu15 and the repairs made to the A/C system from @ELROD. @tgperformance addresses these concerns, stating that there are no visible oil leaks and that the A/C repairs were completed under previous ownership but without available records. This information is helpful yet neutral as it does not provide definitive positive or negative opinions about the vehicle's history.
Negative: While there are no overtly negative comments, the lack of documentation for the A/C repairs might raise concerns for some buyers about the vehicle's maintenance history. The absence of records could lead to uncertainty regarding the quality and reliability of past repairs, leaving subtle room for doubt amongst potential bidders.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments highlighting its condition and desirability. @UncleBaldy expressed appreciation for the quality of offerings from New Hampshire, indicating this F-150 is no exception. @Danskayak referred to the truck as 'a beauty' and was curious about its mileage, while @siegelng remarked on its cleanliness and wish the seller well. @JaSong71 shared a positive backstory, explaining the truck's maintenance history and previous ownership by a doctor, which adds to its appeal. Overall, there is a strong sense of admiration for the truck's condition and history.
Neutral: @putmeontv provided detailed information about the vehicle, emphasizing that it was bought last year for weekend projects but was deemed too nice for such use. The seller noted the truck is minimally modified, straight, and features a near mint interior, while mentioning the tires had been replaced due to age. They also acknowledged that a detail job was done over the winter, and proactively cleaned it to keep it in good shape. The inquiry about the mileage by @Danskayak was addressed confidently by the seller, citing tire dates and documentation as proof, which serves to clarify any doubts regarding its usage.
Negative: However, there were some concerns raised about certain missing features. @67S3 pointed out the absence of a spare tire and wheel, noting a common issue with Ford trucks listed on BaT. The seller acknowledged the lack of a spare tire's presence and mentioned that a part of the carrier is missing as well. Additionally, @jd601953 asked about the receiver hitch and trailer light hookup, to which @putmeontv admitted a lack of knowledge but mentioned that the original invoice does indicate some trailer tow capabilities. Such missing features may deter prospective buyers who require specific functionality.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Huggybearhobo shares fond memories of a baby blue coupe and praises the Cadillac's bulletproof engine, wishing luck to the bidders. @JaDawgPNW and @tenbears both compliment the car's stunning aesthetics. @Dollycat3 finds the CDV's interior gorgeous, while @scarydave and @ModernMode express admiration for its smooth ride and leisure appeal. @grjoe1 reminisces about his own dream driving experience with a similar model, and @Olbugger notes its analog beauty. The seller, @Indygo30, also emphasizes the pristine condition of the vehicle, mentioning it has been kept in a climate-controlled garage and improved where necessary.
Neutral: Several commentators, including @Sunoco260 and @CENTECEQUIPMENT, point out minor issues like the need for a leak test for the A/C and inquire about the status of the rear leveling system, which @Indygo30 clarifies did not come equipped with the car. Some users, such as @Montaine and @ericdev, are engaged in discussions about the vehicle's history, paint condition, and extra features. @Indygo30 also provides detailed responses about the radio system and minor dings present in the trim, emphasizing the transparency of the vehicle's condition while still encouraging prospective buyers to bid confidently.
Negative: A few users raise concerns regarding the car's functionalities, such as the leveling system and the A/C, with @Sunoco260 suggesting it needs attention. @RivieraByBuick questions the authenticity of the original paint, noting misalignments in the body trim and requesting documentation about mileage accuracy. The discussions also touch on general skepticism about the vehicle's history and condition, with @tmakarius and @ParcelGuy asking for paperwork and proof of mileage to ensure the car is not a rollover on the speedometer. However, most remarks focus on admiration and nostalgia rather than overt criticism.
|
16-Mile 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS Dale Earnhardt Signature Edition
2G1WX15K429191543
Lot 200014
Dealer
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its classic status and appreciation for its condition. @Rok87, a longtime Monte Carlo enthusiast, shared a desire to own one in great shape for casual drives, encouraging the seller with a "GLWTA" (Good Luck With The Auction). @Intimidator04 praised the car as possibly one of the lowest mileage examples available, emphasizing its desirability among collectors. Others, like @Brad1187 and @OldGuy, recognized the unique features of the car, with messages conveying excitement about its presence on the market. The combination of its low mileage and classic design seems to have struck a chord with many enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters provided factual information and insights regarding the vehicle's details and history. Comments from @newcarpro outlined specifications and delivery details while @BigRedRivi mentioned observations about the vehicle's inactivity, noting the discrepancy in the Carfax regarding fluid changes. @Siowner reflected on the Monte Carlo's reputation, suggesting it might only be suitable for casual outings, despite its low mileage. Meanwhile, discussion about the historic relevance of the model and nostalgic value emerged, contributing to a broader understanding of the vehicle beyond mere aesthetics or performance.
Negative: Despite the enthusiasm, there were critical comments regarding the vehicle's long periods of inactivity. @BigRedRivi criticized the idea of a car sitting unused for decades, comparing it to other rare vehicles that have suffered from lack of use. Concerns were raised about the request for service records and maintenance history from the seller (@donfuqua), with users like @gauldingr questioning the condition of essential parts like the rubber and battery. Some commenters, such as @OldGuy, expressed skepticism about the car's overall appeal, particularly in terms of its V6 engine and automatic transmission, suggesting it might not live up to the performance expectations set by its muscle car heritage.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @LongiMotorsports (The Seller) emphasizes the quality and maintenance of the vehicle, mentioning that it has zero rust and comes with great service records available on Carfax. The seller has taken proactive steps to enhance the vehicle's reliability, such as having the ignition coils replaced and a new AC compressor installed. They also highlight the importance of transparency in showcasing the vehicle's condition through photos and videos. Overall, the seller presents the vehicle as a well-maintained, one-owner car that has been meticulously cared for.
Neutral: Several comments reflect inquiries about the vehicle's condition and history. @QG1 asks whether the vehicle will pass a smog test and if there are known issues, showcasing a buyer's concern for potential maintenance needs. @JackMac responds to @pgstmxgp, noting that there is no record of the timing chain replacement, raising points about the maintenance history that potential buyers may need to consider. @LongiMotorsports clarifies that a smog test will be conducted for California buyers and acknowledges the potential gaps in reporting by Carfax, which indicates a degree of honest communication about the vehicle’s maintenance background.
Negative: @pgstmxgp is concerned about the timing chain and any items that may not be functioning properly, which reflects apprehension about possible repairs and future ownership experience. @JackMac reinforces these concerns by highlighting that the Carfax report does not indicate every maintenance action that may have been performed, suggesting that buyers should approach the purchase with caution. This indicates a potential lack of complete transparency regarding the vehicle's history, which could deter some interested parties.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BR_549 describes the vehicle as a nice car that should be easy to drive, highlighting its ease of operation. @ac680 loves the color of the car, noting a hint of purple that he finds appealing. @59turner praises the horsepower for a 1974 model, expressing his admiration for the performance metrics of the vehicle. Overall, comments suggest that the car is aesthetically pleasing and fun to drive, with many appreciating its character and history.
Neutral: @davidbmc and @Knuckles-R-Busted confirm options for the vehicle's wheels, noting the availability of wire wheels with splines and different wheel types. @Descanuck raises a question about the car's market value, suggesting it might appeal more to European buyers considering its right-hand drive feature. @charliebird123 asks practical questions about the car's spare tire and overall readiness for long-distance driving, indicating a genuine interest in the car's condition and usability.
Negative: While many comments are positive or neutral, there is some hesitation expressed. @Jagster911 notes he does not care for the V-12 engine but still finds the car intriguing if priced right. @charliebird123's concern about the vehicle's age and potential fears about driving it long distances reflects skepticism regarding reliability. Additionally, there is a request for videos to confirm the car's running condition, implying possible doubts about its mechanical state.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @r6erik describes the vehicle as the best Mopar color of all time. @Ghosty expresses admiration for the beautiful 'Sublime' green Challenger, particularly appreciating the clean front end design and bumper of the 1970-71 models compared to the '72. @Envypete shares excitement about seeing their former car, praising it as a joy to drive and a head-turner, noting it as the most striking color for a Challenger and wishing the seller well with the auction. @12amDemon simply calls the vehicle a beauty.
Neutral: @66alfa_gtv comments on the shared experience of having previously owned a Challenger, noting that their red R/T was repainted sublime green by a subsequent owner, and mentions seeing it at local car events in Portland several years ago.
Negative:
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters express their admiration for the 2008 Porsche Boxster S Limited Edition, highlighting the car's features and aesthetics. @Tigerpaw9287 describes it as 'Amazing,' while @AndyL215 praises everything about the car and appreciates its sound compared to his own Porsche. @MTH notes the car as a 'great example' and points out its unusual specification, adding to its appeal. Additionally, @Dwdbox2000 considers 2008 the best year for Boxster Limited Editions due to the bold color choices, reinforcing a strong positive sentiment towards this model.
Neutral: In the comments, @1600veloce (The Seller) provides detailed responses to various inquiries about the car, including maintenance history and the IMS bearing condition, indicating a proactive approach to potential buyers. The seller also mentions the availability of a live video walk-around and emphasizes the thoroughness of their listings on BaT. There are discussions about various aspects of the car, such as the original rims, keys, and whether it has seen any smoke, demonstrating that potential buyers are engaged and seeking detailed information before making a purchasing decision.
Negative: Some concerns are raised by commenters regarding specific aspects of the car. @Porchetarga points out a discrepancy about the car being described as a 'super clean one owner example' when CarFax indicates there have been three owners. Additionally, @Alta4TheWin inquires about potential bore scoring after seeing photos, suggesting caution. @glehelle also flags an issue with the passenger side top not being tucked properly in the video, which raises questions about the car's overall condition. These comments reflect a level of skepticism and caution among potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm and appreciation for the unique Porsche 924S GTR Carrera GT tribute, with several indicating a fondness for the build. @fr944 and @Vtec4ever both conveyed excitement, suggesting that the vehicle truly captures the essence of the original GTR models. @topley and @Bravado admired the execution of the tribute and noted that the 924 GT/GTS/GTR tribute vehicles are often underappreciated, further highlighting the quality of the car's condition with mentions of its well-sorted nature and appeal for social events like cars and coffee gatherings.
Neutral: The seller, @ForzaV12, provided detailed responses to questions about the vehicle's history and condition. @Bartlola inquired about maintenance records, and @hawaiiusmc1 requested information on any recent changes to the timing belt, water pump, or clutch, all of which @ForzaV12 addressed with transparency about maintenance history, stating that while recent verification isn't available, the vehicle operates flawlessly without rust issues. Other commenters, such as @303Lurch and @tlippold, added their positive remarks about the car’s aesthetic, while @RA_TRN6 sought more specific photos to address potential concerns regarding rust in certain areas.
Negative: While the comments were largely positive, a few concerns were raised, particularly regarding the somewhat vague maintenance records. Users like @RA_TRN6 and @neobert13 sought clarification about specific issues like the rear hatch delamination and the functionality of the air conditioning. There were implications of hidden rust in certain areas, and @neobert13's questioning of possible overheating issues indicated a cautious approach to the vehicle's overall reliability. However, the seller assured that there are no known overheating problems and provided detailed images to respond to the inquiries regarding hidden rust.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its quality and enjoyable driving experience. @Todd_Z. highlighted the vehicle's desirable features, noting the T-18 with overdrive, front disc brakes, and the original Buick Dauntless 225 V6 engine. @Blizzard340 expressed that CJ5s offer great value compared to similar vintage options like the FJ40. @RCPjohn, the seller, emphasized the Jeep's original components and thoughtful upgrades, making it enjoyable and straightforward to drive, while @Jcptom described it as stunning and ready for adventure.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions about the vehicle's authenticity and modifications. @Valkyrja inquired about the body and tailgate, while @cadenco expressed concerns regarding the tail lights and potential bondo usage during restoration. @OldA7dguy provided insight about the vehicle's historical details, affirming that most body panels were correct for a Kaiser Jeep and answering related questions about changes over the years. Comments from @Ntmjeep discussed the expected features for a vehicle from the 1970s and expressed enjoyment in the chosen refurbishment aspects, while @RCPjohn confirmed these details with a mix of affirmation and historical context.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's restoration and potential issues were raised by several users. @Treepeddler mentioned not liking the dashboard but acknowledged the Jeep's overall attractiveness. @cadenco pointed out unoriginal details that could hint at a rebuilt body and requested original photos, implying doubt about the restoration quality. @colojeepguy remarked that the smoothness of the body appeared inconsistent with factory production, suggesting extensive bondo work, while @Ntmjeep noted features like the absence of side markers that would be expected in a vehicle of that era, indicating it may not cater to collectors.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @screamindave expressed excitement, calling the vehicle "cool" and wishing good luck to the seller. @aleeka stated that it would be their preferred choice to drive to a Cars & Coffee event, while @Markny9 noted that it's not something commonly seen, emphasizing its stylish appeal. The uniqueness of the vehicle is also highlighted by @Fantod13, who referred to it as an elegant version of a classic 'Miss Agnes'. Commenters like @AaronC325is and @Apathyfern appreciated its one-of-a-kind quality, while @CrazyV8 and @mikeyork5 praised its exceptional engineering and condition, indicating that it runs perfectly with no unusual noises.
Neutral: Several commentators discussed the vehicle's features and history without strong emotions. @Docbbq raised concerns about the engine's noise levels, while @kevingd echoed this by requesting a mechanical review. @Trencherking (The Seller) responded, providing reassurance about the engine's performance and elaborating on the vehicle's maintenance history, including a stainless steel gas tank replacement. Commenters such as @puebla acknowledged its nicely executed conversion, while @brakeservo noted its historical context within Rolls-Royce's production of utility vehicles. The mix of admiration for the car's artistry and caution about its practicality created a nuanced perspective among the respondents.
Negative: On the negative side, some commentators questioned the practicality and peculiarities of altering a Rolls-Royce into a pickup, with @trublu stating that it feels odd to combine the two concepts. @big_dave expressed concern over the loudness of the truck despite assurances from @Trencherking about its quieter operation at optimal temperature. @Docbbq noted that previous experiences with similar vehicles indicated they were typically silent. Furthermore, @PMC1924 mentioned the high cost and rarity of parts, pointing out that maintaining such unique vehicles could present challenges. Overall, there is a sense of skepticism mingled with curiosity, leading to mixed feelings about the car's practicality and maintenance requirements.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport Supercharged Dynamic has been described as a super clean one-owner vehicle with only 23,000 miles. @1600veloce, the seller, assures potential buyers that the car comes with all keys, books, and the original window sticker, emphasizing that it has been recently serviced, including an oil change and brake fluid flush. Additionally, the seller highlights their commitment to providing thorough listings and detailed information about each vehicle, showcasing a dedication to quality and transparency in the sales process.
Neutral: The seller, @1600veloce, offers a variety of services, including video tours and appointments for in-person walk-arounds to view the vehicle. They also mention that the car is stored in a climate-controlled facility and is ready for delivery. Any questions regarding payments or logistics can be addressed by contacting the seller directly. Furthermore, @1600veloce states that they are a regular seller on the platform with extensive experience, providing assurance of credibility and professionalism.
Negative: There was a concern raised by @7and8s regarding whether anyone had smoked in the vehicle, which could indicate potential lingering odors. However, @1600veloce promptly responded that there has been no smoking in the car, alleviating that potential issue. Overall, the comments do not highlight significant negative aspects, focusing instead on the positive attributes of the vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BxBushman (The Seller) expresses that the 2014 BMW 428i has been a great sporty daily driver and is sad to see it go. The seller encourages potential buyers to reach out with questions or requests for additional photos or videos, demonstrating openness and willingness to engage with interested parties.
Neutral: Multiple comments indicate an active bidding process, with @mkbelenky raising a concern about accidentally placing a bid that needs adjustment. @bringatrailer suggests double-checking bid confirmations while @Valkyrja positions the current situation as an opportunity to bid $7500. There are also inquiries about the car's emissions compliance in specific states, with @Ssorembe asking about Massachusetts regulations and @AriGold23 bringing up concerns regarding California emissions standards.
Negative: Concerns about emissions compliance are highlighted, particularly from @AriGold23, who questions the seller's claim regarding smog checks and the vehicle's configuration. This comment references a potential misunderstanding of California's emission laws, indicating that the vehicle may not be compliant with current regulations unless modifications are made. This could potentially discourage California buyers due to the confusion over responsibility for smog checks.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @m2mostly expresses nostalgia, stating the car is a dream from his childhood. @BarrettS shares fond memories of owning a similar vehicle while serving in the Air Force, appreciating its neat patina and unique features like the tailgate. @Dollycat3 encourages talent in the community to seize the opportunity with this vehicle, while @Rpharesjr emphasizes the car's potential for restoration, wishing to take it on as a project. @Laurence5905 would purchase and refurbish it, planning to showcase it at car shows, highlighting its increasing value. @1959PeerlessGT (The Seller) reassures that the vehicle starts easily and runs well, branding it a reliable ride.
Neutral: @Gregpryckman questions the car's true market value if sold elsewhere, suggesting restoration costs would exceed its sale price. @KatieKlean humorously speculates about the bench seats and identifies the car as possibly belonging to Alice, depicting a nostalgic imagery. @Tarheel6 shares a tip for restoring the vinyl wood sides based on previous experiences, while @Babyp clarifies that shag carpet was indeed an option for the cargo area in these models, aiming to address confusion.
Negative: @phavriluk is flagged for a non-constructive comment, with @joeveto defending the car for its special shag carpeting, which some share skepticism about. @the.jag.man critiques the short running video for its brevity and questions the vehicle's heating capabilities, also wondering about its travel reliability. @jbh30319 notes that the shag carpet clearly didn’t come from the factory and expresses a desire to see some restoration done. @Danielrunyon states a lower price bracket for similar cars in different markets, indicating a lack of perceived value in this vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors like @SirMercsALot express excitement about the vehicle, calling it a "stunner" and a piece of history. @GDogg appreciates the aesthetics of the car, specifically its black color on the 170S Cabriolet, and reminisces about how the white version must have been attractive as well. @AntiqueRetriever shares a nostalgic experience from the late 1970s, highlighting the car's trading history and its journey from Missouri to Texas.
Neutral: @btmbtech1 interacts with @seller to discuss logistical matters regarding communication, hinting at a level of involvement in the buying process. @hr47cars reflects on a personal past experience with a rougher version of the car from 55 years ago, remarking on Mercedes' remarkable ability to restart production after extensive damage, which indicates some level of familiarity with the brand's resilience.
Negative: There are no outright negative comments regarding the vehicle. However, @hr47cars hints at potential concerns about the auction process, mentioning the possibility of bids not reaching previous highs, which may suggest a lack of confidence in the auction outcome.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @patoneill04 confirmed that the vehicle comes with a separate battery for the fridge and other electronics, which is a positive feature for users looking for additional power sources for their devices. The mention of a remote for the winch also adds convenience for the users, enhancing the overall utility of the vehicle. Additionally, @Donnyov suggests that the vehicle deserves a price range of 45-55k, indicating that there is a perceived value and demand for it in the current market.
Neutral: Commenters such as @Milk_Mane inquired about the inclusion of a Sirius XM subscription, but there was no direct response to that query. @Donnyov posed a question regarding the pricing, which suggests some curiosity about the vehicle's market position. @rofandofy pointed out a trend among buyers favoring the Tundra 5.7 over the newer V6 models, which shows a shift in consumer preferences without expressing a strong opinion on the vehicle itself.
Negative: @TylerPedee expressed a concern regarding the pricing of the vehicle, suggesting it is "violently low," which may indicate a perception that the asking price does not align with the expected market value. This concern might lead potential buyers to question the vehicle's condition or the reasons behind the pricing. Overall, while there are positive comments about features and value, there remains a sentiment suggesting that the pricing could be an issue for some prospective customers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Hooper82 (The Seller) describes the truck as a very powerful and reliable vehicle, emphasizing that it's been meticulously restored with numerous upgrades including a new front end with quality parts and a new exhaust that offers an impressive sound. The truck has brand new Michelin tires and has undergone comprehensive servicing, including an oil change and transmission maintenance. The seller proudly states the truck gets great fuel mileage and drives incredibly smoothly, asserting that it truly is a sweet truck that has been treated with care throughout its life, particularly noting its rust-free condition and excellent interior clarity.
Neutral: Commenters like @CRUSH and @Johnny1eye acknowledge the truck's impressive qualities, particularly praising the unique sound of the Cummins engine, which they find appealing and associated with classic power. @neddyo292 appreciates the detailed restoration work, specifically the quality of the paint job shown in the dash area. The positive remarks from these users contribute to the overall favorable sentiment surrounding the vehicle, enhancing its image as a well-loved classic.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback, potential concerns might arise regarding the seller's claims. The extensive mention of the restoration and upgrades raises questions about the truck's original condition and potential hidden issues, which aren't fully addressed in the comments. Some users may feel cautious about the depth of restoration in older vehicles and whether the modifications genuinely enhance reliability or if they were necessary due to previous problems.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm about the vehicle's exceptional qualities. @E86_nerd describes it as stunning and fittingly priced. @PontiacNut highlights the car's one-owner status, low mileage, and attractive colors, indicating that it has everything a buyer could want. @CobrasBMW anticipates that the auction will be exciting, while @ExclusiveStudioGarage predicts a high sale price and encourages others to get involved. @Collectibleclassics applauds the overall presentation of the vehicle, suggesting it will rapidly gain value. Overall, the consensus is that this M Coupe is a rare gem, likely to pique collectors' interest.
Neutral: Several comments reflect curiosity and anticipation about the vehicle's auction and condition. @jcmc97 notes some minor imperfections, acknowledging the overall beauty despite its few blemishes. @Skiv questions the low mileage, mentioning the tendency of cars to have low mileage descriptions raised by various owners. @RapleyClassicCars, the seller, breaks down the vehicle's maintenance history and reassures buyers about the car's readiness for sale. The discussions indicate a mixture of admiration and caution, with comments focused on evaluating the car's attributes.
Negative: Some comments carry a tone of disappointment regarding the car's underutilization. @Piggylou expresses discontent, suggesting it is a waste for such a capable car not to have been driven more, while @DarthLincoln shares a similar sentiment, hoping the next owner will truly enjoy the car's capabilities. @Tuscan criticizes the car's exhaust sound as not typical for an S54, indicating dissatisfaction with its current presentation. There are also technical inquiries about certain features, like the shift knob's lighting and radio code from @2K4Z06, suggesting not all aspects of the car meet expectations.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments praise the Ferrari F430 for its appealing design, impressive modifications, and overall driving experience. @FFCobra noted the astonishing appreciation of the F430's value compared to other supercars. Similarly, @boaboyoz described it as a "classy" specimen, expressing confidence in the quality of the vehicle being sold. The seller, @Quikvet, consistently emphasizes the car's good maintenance record, highlighting features like a recent clutch service with a remaining life of 91% and only 16,675 miles on the odometer, further supporting its condition as a highly desirable vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions about specific features and technicalities of the car, including comments by @Ahalley, who confirmed their original ownership of the car and speculated on the carbon fiber options. @GrigioF430 shared insights about California emissions, insisting that while they own an F430 with OEM equipment, aftermarket modifications could potentially affect its emissions status. Questions from users like @matjer about the ECU tune and @coveredallwinter about the condition of the mirrors and the operation of the top reflect a community interested in the vehicle's specific performance and compliance details.
Negative: Despite the overall enthusiasm, some uncertainties and criticisms surfaced relating to specific aspects of the vehicle's condition. @mthomas raised doubts about the seller's reported clutch life remaining, suggesting discrepancies in the data presented. Additionally, concerns about common issues with F430s, such as bubbling on the dashboard, were brought up by @Yogs, prompting inquiries on the current state of the car's interior. Furthermore, comments from @nalich and @MikeB442 highlighted the lack of original parts, which some potential buyers might consider a drawback.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @corrieb expresses admiration for the custom hubcaps, noting that there is a special appeal for this type of vehicle, particularly when it comes to the exterior design matching its character. @Avcat123 praises it as the best riding compact ever built, highlighting its smooth performance. @Moldavidian shares a nostalgic fondness for the model, recalling a friend's ownership in high school and expressing a desire to rescue similar cars, which indicates a positive emotional connection with the vehicle.
Neutral: @port84-classics (The Seller) responds to inquiries from various users, indicating that the car has been well-maintained with applied fluid film for preservation. They provide shipping quote estimates for potential buyers, demonstrating a willingness to assist. Comments from @Paul85 and @Martin_480_Turbo reflect a geographical interest in the vehicle and its history, adding an informational aspect to the conversation about ownership and location.
Negative: Concerns are raised by @berfinroy and @squirrellymerley regarding the absence of air conditioning in vehicles of this era, which may be off-putting for some buyers, especially given modern comforts. @djac70 questions the need for a carburettor rebuild, indicating potential reliability issues, while @FervesFever expresses a concern about shipping costs potentially overshadowing the car's purchase price. @KB_Collection inquires about the TÜV, indicating uncertainty around regulatory requirements, which may affect buyer confidence.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Linemanbiker appreciates the aesthetics of the Low Glide, commenting on its visual appeal and comparing its comfort to that of a spouse. @bertsboat reminisces about their experience with a similar bike, highlighting its coolness and noting modifications that make it a thrilling ride. @Jack659831 expresses gratitude for personal choice in the bike's design, praising the inclusion of forward controls and original parts without excessive customizations, suggesting that the FXR provides excellent value for the investment.
Neutral: @peterinPDX shares a nostalgic connection, mentioning their own experience with a 91 FXLR and admiring the bike's frame quality. @americanharley, the seller, engages with @boyhowdee regarding a minor issue with the left rear turn signal, reflecting a proactive approach to maintaining the vehicle's functionality. @Atomic11 raises a question about the engine size, seeking clarity on the modifications that led to an 82 ci capacity, indicating curiosity towards technical aspects of the bike.
Negative: @Boyhowdee points out a practical concern regarding the left rear turn signal needing a bulb replacement, suggesting it may not be in optimal condition. @Picohill reacts negatively towards the forward controls and certain aesthetic features of the bike, indicating a desire for more traditional configurations and expressing intent to make changes upon acquisition. @Stephen105 humorously remarks that having forward controls on an FXR is a federal crime, indicating a strong opinion against that style choice.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Juggs44 mentions the initial auction for the vehicle is off to a great start, indicating some level of enthusiasm for its sale. @Cobraman offers a defense of the new Z model by acknowledging its unique qualities, describing the driving experience as pleasing and noting that the vehicle’s sales improved over time due to better dealer pricing strategies. @Kungo56 expresses his love for the Proto model, stating it fulfills its purpose and retains the classic Z characteristics, which he finds enjoyable and fun.
Neutral: @Hollyb1981, the seller, provides insights into the auction process, explaining the decision to cancel it due to an unsatisfactory bid amount as directed by her husband. She highlights that the car was listed initially when prices were high and her motivation behind the auction was misunderstood. Several commenters, including @Napolison and @I_Am_The_Walrus, engage with the seller's remarks, showing interest and skepticism regarding the auction practices that transpired.
Negative: @Deanhuff shares a negative experience of attempting to purchase the car via eBay, feeling misled by the seller's actions and labeling it a warning for other buyers. @KrisA critiques the vehicle, comparing it unfavorably to prior models and describing it as overpriced and underwhelming in performance. @rearendsloose laments that the car, while visually appealing, is ultimately a 'beautiful dud', expressing disappointment in its driving capabilities. Several commenters, such as @MTGGTC and @touchyu2, raise concerns about the authenticity of the seller's claims and the overall trustworthiness of the auction process.
|
1978 Dodge W400 4×4 4-Speed Pierce Mini Attack Pumper Brush Fire Truck
W41CJ8S278187
Lot 199958
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz described the Dodge W400 fire truck as a "handsome and practical beast," indicating its appeal and utility. @whosthatcowboy mentioned that it is a "nice 'hot shot' truck" that is well outfitted, suggesting its quality and readiness for action. Additionally, @wolfmgt kicked off the comments with enthusiasm about the vehicle, reflecting a general excitement around the auction and interest in the truck's capabilities.
Neutral: The seller, @kurtlind1, provided comprehensive answers to various questions from potential buyers about the fire truck's features, including its water tank capacity of 250 gallons and the functionality of the PTO driven winch. He also confirmed that the truck can be filled by gravity and that the low range 4-wheel drive works properly, responding to inquiries about its operational capabilities. The seller shared videos showcasing the truck's water pumping power and starting mechanism, aiming to engage interested bidders further.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, there was some skepticism, particularly from @wheels4life, who questioned how well the truck performs under pressure, hinting that the initial video showed limited capabilities. @RangerTJ raised concerns about its practicality for long drives, suggesting that shipping might be a more economical choice given its low gearing. Overall, while the vehicle has many strong points, there are concerns from some users about its operational limits and usage for long-distance travel.
|
25-Years-Owned 1980 Datsun 280ZX 10th Anniversary Edition 5-Speed
HS130226895
Lot 199964
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, praising its beauty and originality. @zdoctor noted the vehicle as a 'very nice original zx10th' with perfect mileage and condition, wishing to add it to their collection. @74Impalacustom called it 'the nicest one I've seen,' while @StockZ highlighted its low mileage, pointing out that owning an original is a rare opportunity due to the scarcity of stock parts. @Competitioncars expressed excitement about the car being up for sale and also asked detailed questions about its condition, demonstrating interest in its originality and maintenance records.
Neutral: Several users sought clarification and additional information regarding specific features of the vehicle. @Leiniesbuddy inquired about the date code on the mounted tires and the functionality of the A/C. @Geeps1970 asked for maintenance records to gauge the car's care history. @Competitioncars contributed several requests for pictures of different components of the car, such as pinch welds and door jambs, showing a keen interest in thorough details. The seller, @Toyota1986, actively engaged with these questions, promising to provide the requested information and acknowledging the interest shown by the bidders.
Negative: A few commenters voiced concerns over the condition of certain aspects of the vehicle. @Leiniesbuddy specifically asked for information about the original paint job and whether any parts of the interior had been replaced, indicating apprehension about potential modifications. Additionally, @zdoctor raised a question about the absence of the original cassette tape that typically accompanies the anniversary edition. This indicated a sense of disappointment that some original components might be missing, which is particularly valued by collectors. Overall, there appeared to be a slight hesitance among users about whether the vehicle remains truly untouched.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @reinhg describes the 100k-mile Bentley as a remarkable sight, comparing it to a unicorn. @Dollycat3 appreciates the car's beauty and well-cared-for condition, emphasizing that it is a high-mileage Bentley Continental GT. @GDogg finds the CGT Mulliner in Sapphire Blue over Linen to be absolutely sensational, suggesting that it might be even more captivating in person. The overall consensus among various commenters highlights the car's stunning aesthetics and the quality of its maintenance throughout its ownership, reinforcing its desirability despite the mileage.
Neutral: @Jimlerbs (The Seller) introduces the auction for the Bentley Continental GT coupe, highlighting its one-owner history from Palm Beach and transparency regarding its servicing with an available CarFax report. The seller encourages questions and comments while announcing that videos of the car will be uploaded, including a driving video and a walk-around video for potential buyers. Comments indicate continued engagement with the auction process, including generic inquiries about the car's features and spec updates regarding recent services such as new tires and the original Bentley phone being included.
Negative: @tburns2061 raises concerns about the repairs, asking if the car has been a non-smoker and questioning the reason behind multiple brake replacements. @Jimlerbs (The Seller) clarifies that the vehicle is a non-smoker and provides a detailed explanation regarding the brake replacements, indicating only one actual replacement in March 2018, while the earlier record was just an estimate. Their responses address potential buyer apprehensions but reflect an underlying concern regarding the vehicle's maintenance history.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments showcase a strong appreciation for the Volvo 960 wagon's driving experience and build quality. @spuh, the seller, highlights the comfort of the car, mentioning its smooth highway ride and quiet cabin, making it an ideal choice for long-distance travel. Several users, including @TJC45 and @YTJohn, share their fond memories of driving Volvos, echoing @spuh's sentiments about the car's reliability and comfort. @Banater even compliments the seller's openness and honesty, which contributes to a positive atmosphere surrounding the auction.
Neutral: There are comments discussing the seller's strategy and dedication toward the auction. @spuh makes it clear that he aims to provide full transparency about the vehicle, admitting its faults while also inviting questions early on due to his travel schedule. @Ronchristie recounts personal stories from the time when Volvo was more prevalent in his community, reminiscing about their significance. Others discuss the car's engineering heritage, with @Old_Ned noting the influence of Porsche on the car's development. The sense of camaraderie among the commenters, discussing their experiences without overt criticism, contributes to a neutral tone.
Negative: While the comments are generally positive, there are hints of disappointment with the car's condition and past experiences. @spuh acknowledges that the car was not as described upon purchase but emphasizes that none of the issues were severe enough to ruin his enjoyment. @YTJohn points out a glaring shortcoming regarding the scarcity of aftermarket performance parts specific to the later model 900s, suggesting challenges for potential owners. Additionally, @Lucky7 mentions the car could shine with effort, hinting at the work needed to restore it, while expressing a reluctance to bid due to personal financial constraints.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @starcity provided extensive details about the vehicle, highlighting that over $300,000 was spent on the build, showcasing its brand new condition with only 850 miles on it. The Pearl Orange exterior and custom Bugatti leather interior received particular praise, with features including a premium sound system and advanced climate control noted. @rickaz also complimented the seamless integration of the body and roof, enhancing the car's aesthetics, while @pigman appreciated the quality build and money spent on the interior, reinforcing the car's overall appeal.
Neutral: Several @commentors expressed curiosity about specific features of the vehicle, including the effectiveness of air conditioning, the type of coilovers used, and the rear end gear ratio. @FourPeaksMotorsports had multiple inquiries regarding safety features like shoulder harnesses and door locking mechanisms, to which @starcity responded comprehensively. Additionally, @pigman shared insights on making a similar modification for safety, indicating an interest in practical elements that contribute to the car's usability and safety in emergencies.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, some comments pointed out concerns regarding the choice of materials and features. @zillah mentioned the oddity of investing heavily into a build without opting for a steel body or an overdrive transmission, suggesting limitations to fiberglass in high-performance applications. @VanMelum countered this sentiment by discussing the benefits of fiberglass, especially in rust-prone climates, indicating a divide in opinions on material choice and overall vehicle performance. These critiques suggest that while the vehicle is impressive, certain decisions may not align with all buyers' preferences.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @98SNAKEEATER praises the vehicle as a "Good lookin rig with Magic Dial" indicating a favorable impression of its aesthetics and features. @PWWSam echoes this sentiment, describing the rig as a "good looking rig, with nicely done mods," while also inquiring more about its service history, which showcases an interest in both appearance and mechanical condition. @ODawg (The Seller) confirms several positive aspects, stating that the original paint is in good condition and clarifying that the vehicle does not have rust, emphasizing its overall well-kept exterior.
Neutral: A variety of inquiries and comments from other users reflect both curiosity and a desire for more information about the vehicle. @Pippy's comment about being flagged for non-constructiveness indicates a shift in conversation focus without contributing further details. Questions from @prrussd and @PWWSam about the head gasket and service records show a balanced interest in understanding the vehicle's maintenance history. @ODawg (The Seller) responds with detailed information about the vehicle's condition and repairs which conveys a neutral stance as he provides factual updates to potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding a reported accident, as highlighted by @espanolie's query about the vehicle's history, which led @ODawg (The Seller) to acknowledge a collision report on Carfax that he was unaware of, although he also noted that no significant damages were present. @NStraut's question about wheel spacers indicates a potential issue with how the vehicle has been maintained, while @PWWSam notes the recurring issue with leaking knuckles, adding a bit of skepticism to the vehicle's condition. Overall, while the comments are mostly positive, there are underlying concerns about service history and minor mechanical issues that could worry prospective buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @boaboyoz expressed excitement about the vehicle, suggesting its impressive capabilities for long travels, humorously noting its potential as a world traveler. @tlcamg added that the vehicle boasts an impressive torque of over 800 ft lbs, which signifies its towing capacity, making it ideal for transporting heavy loads. Another user, @Uvacarbuff, reinforced the positive sentiment by sharing his experience with a similar vehicle, highlighting its great driving performance and reliability for long journeys with heavy trailers.
Neutral: @CoolCustomsGarage (The Seller) consistently engaged with potential buyers, promoting the beauty of Wyoming and suggesting the vehicle as an ideal way to explore national parks and other attractions. They addressed inquiries regarding endorsements for driving and confirmed the vehicle's towing capacity of 10,000 pounds. Furthermore, the seller provided specific details requested by potential buyers, such as videos of the roof and refrigerator features, which reflects a commitment to customer service.
Negative: Comments reflective of skepticism included @Collins4A's humorous but dismissive take on the semi-motorhome concept, indicating some hesitance about making such a purchase. @stevenross raised practical concerns regarding the vehicle's features, such as solar capabilities and roof conditions, implying these could be significant factors for potential buyers. Additionally, @Rkan's inquiry about washer/dryer connections in the vehicle hinted at the need for further customization, which could detract from its appeal.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @HeritageGruppe details the meticulous care the 1999 Mercedes CL500 has received, indicating that the previous owner has spent around $40,000 on repairs and improvements since purchasing it in 2022. The car is described as being in great shape, both inside and out, with a recent repaint that enhances its appearance, excluding minor dents on the roof. Commenters like @Uberpower and @darcyjs praise the car's presence and express a strong interest in its exceptional maintenance and the owner's commitment to quality.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Lubedude1 and @FXRcR1, engage in discussions about the car's specifications, such as the wheel configuration and paint details. Questions arise about why the roof was not repainted despite visible dents and the nature of the modifications made to the vehicle. @Darcyjs and others express fascination over the car's restoration and the seller's thorough documentation of maintenance, showing a balance between admiration and curiosity regarding specific aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns about the repaint and the impact of the modifications on the car's performance and value. @Tom_us1 questions the overall paint thickness and previous work done, indicating potential apprehension over hidden issues. Additionally, @Dinodino highlights the absence of roof repairs and raises doubts about the repair receipts, suggesting a lack of transparency about the car's history. Concerns about the quality and necessity of expenditures on the vehicle are also noted, which may affect potential buyers' perceptions.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @NavarroG remarked on the fun nature of these vehicles, expressing good wishes for the auction and creating a light-hearted connection by referencing a popular movie. @Billdozer2 praised the buggy and specifically liked the hard top, suggesting it would look even cooler with custom van bubble windows. @Mchouse complimented the videos provided, showing an interest in the vehicle's performance, particularly at lower RPMs.
Neutral: @Volksmotorman (The Seller) clarified that the vehicle came with wheel adapters that gave it a wider stance, addressing a question about the front wheels. In his video, he explained the origins of the homemade VIN plate and details about the previous ownership, ensuring potential buyers understand the vehicle's history. @Billdozer2 acknowledged the explanation, indicating a shared interest in the details provided by the seller.
Negative: @onedaysomeday humorously criticized the vehicle's appearance by likening it to an oversized Darth Vader helmet. @Robson425 questioned the practicality of the wheel adapters, suggesting the vehicle should ideally retain its wide 5s. @Mchouse raised concerns about the vehicle's ability to reach highway speeds and its overall comfort for longer drives.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its attractive features and quality of craftsmanship. @boaboyoz praises the build quality and color, referring to it as a "tasty Tennessee Camaro, rockin in red". @My3sons_nh expresses that the vehicle has it all, wishing good luck to the seller. Other comments like @jimmytheirishman's mention of the LS1 engine being a significant upgrade and overall positive remarks about the build contribute to a favorable impression, suggesting the car is well-received among potential bidders. @funkaholik appreciates the modern drivetrain combined with the stock look, indicating a strong early bidding process that validates the quality of the vehicle.
Neutral: Some comments focus on the specifics and potential concerns regarding the vehicle's authenticity and modifications. @greatscott points out unique features of the Camaro, questioning the availability of interior options and suggesting that a backstory from the seller would be beneficial. @ssterry agrees that while modifications could deter some bidders, many might overlook these considerations, highlighting the varied perspectives potential buyers may have. Additionally, @limegreen396 brings up practical concerns about the vehicle's features like air conditioning and the stereo system, showcasing a desire for more detailed information.
Negative: Negative feedback includes pointed critiques about the vehicle's details and authenticity. @William302 questions the integrity of the body tag, while @Tigers196884 and others inquire about the VIN tag and existing components like the antenna, suggesting these missing elements could impact the car's appeal. @NCRSmaniac expresses disappointment for a seemingly neglected detail—the antenna—indicating that appearance matters significantly in the bidding and selling process. Meanwhile, @ssterry speculates about the vehicle's factory specifications, implying that restoration accuracy might not meet collector expectations.
|
2001 Ford F-550 XLT Super Duty Centurion Crew Cab Power Stroke Dually 4×4 6-Speed
1FDAW57F01EC99869
Lot 199969
Dealer
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle is highly praised, particularly for its rare features as a one-owner 2001 F-550 Crew Cab with low mileage of just 69,000. @Mjclassictrucks (The Seller) highlights the truck's powerful engine, the 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel, paired with a 6-speed manual transmission, making it a desirable option for buyers looking for a heavy-duty truck. Many commenters appreciate the additional videos uploaded by @Mjclassictrucks (The Seller) that showcase the condition and performance of the truck, with smooth operation and excellent function of the four-wheel-drive system, power features, and A/C.
Neutral: Several comments raise questions about the structural modifications to the vehicle, particularly regarding the gap between the cab and the bed. @400case notes that the gap appears unusual, while other users like @SkyCSGO and @Mjclassictrucks (The Seller) clarify that the truck was a factory cab/chassis with modifications by Centurion. @jamesbehel and @develop are interested in more specific photographs of the undercarriage and bed details to evaluate the truck further. Additionally, potential buyers express curiosity about the vehicle's fuel efficiency, with @Shady580 asking about its MPGs.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly about a bent left rear outer wheel, as mentioned by @Michaelwp and @eddyalzpr. The seller, @Mjclassictrucks (The Seller), acknowledges the issue but mentions that most wheels are in great shape. @eddyalzpr also inquires if the original clutch is still in place, to which @Mjclassictrucks (The Seller) confirms it is. Some users express skepticism about the feasibility of a long-distance drive with the wheel condition, reflecting apprehension about the truck's safety and reliability for heavy hauling.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Homework expressed that if they were a diplomat, they would choose this vehicle as their chauffeur car, highlighting the model's impressive aesthetic and status. @Urbanista thanked @Serghei_Amg for posting videos about the car and noted that the air conditioning was functioning well, indicating satisfaction with the vehicle's condition. @Boatymcboatface applauded the car as a "nice example" with rare seating, mentioning their own positive experience with a similar model and implying that this vehicle would have substantial service receipts.
Neutral: @Serghei_Amg, the seller, provided detailed responses to comments, confirming the presence of service paperwork and stating that all electronic functions of the vehicle were operational. The seller indicated the car has been well-maintained and shared insights on the replacement of spark plugs and coils, highlighting its good condition and the fact it has not required extensive maintenance. The seller also mentioned that video documentation and further details would be posted for potential buyers to assess the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about specific details regarding the vehicle. @Agomes121 inquired about the material of the dash and door panel armrests, suggesting uncertainty about whether they were leather or vinyl. @GenExcars made multiple requests for videos and technical information about the car's operations, indicating they are a serious buyer seeking reassurance about the vehicle's performance. Additionally, @AlbiBenz questioned the performance and maintenance of the shock system, which highlights a level of scrutiny regarding the vehicle's overall condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous favorable remarks for its stunning restoration and beautiful Burgundy Red color. Commentors like @AbbyAk and @Damaho912 expressed admiration for the excellent condition of the car, noting it as a 'gorgeous' and 'beautiful' example of the Porsche 912. @Raffi, the seller, detailed the extensive restoration process that the car underwent, emphasizing its flawless history and matching numbers, making it a coveted option in today's market. Many users remarked on the attention to detail in the restoration, with @Jamoore appreciating the builder's commitment to quality and @maw06 reminiscing about the straightforward driving experience offered by classic cars such as this 912. Overall, there's a strong consensus that this vehicle is a prime example of Porsche craftsmanship, with some even calling it 'stunning' and 'absolutely spectacular.'
Neutral: While many commenters shared their positive views, there were some neutral observations regarding the vehicle's features and restoration details. For instance, @Robson425 pointed out the rarity of the original smog equipment, which was included in the restoration, indicating that it is a unique aspect of the car for enthusiasts. @LouFifer asked about a specific part of the engine, showing curiosity about its original components, while @goodwork mentioned the smog pump's function. @Raffi provided thorough answers to these inquiries, enhancing the transparency about the car's status while inviting further discussion on optional modifications for future owners.
Negative: In contrast, there were a few negative or critical comments regarding the vehicle's authenticity and performance. Commentor @milage suggested that replacing the current carbs with original Solex units would enhance its perfection, implying that the current setup may not be ideal for purists. @Tyracious made a remark that garnered flags from other users, indicating it may have been perceived as unconstructive, but later clarified their thoughts on the detailed restoration. Despite these few dissenting voices, the overall sentiment remained overwhelmingly positive, with most users lauding the vehicle's exceptional aesthetics and engineering.
|
2,700-Mile 1994 Alfa Romeo Spider Veloce Commemorative Edition
ZARBB32N5R7008411
Lot 199973
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's beauty and condition. @rgmaria, who owned a similar model, remarked on its gorgeous Alacantra seat panels and expressed nostalgia for the car. @longDucDong declared it a stunning roadster, preferring it over other comparable vehicles for its design. @bartocgi and @GuyLewis highlighted the rarity and originality of this low mileage car, expressing appreciation for its well-preserved state, with @GuyLewis even proclaiming it to be in 'ABSOLUTELY perfect' condition. These positive sentiments showcase a shared admiration for the Alfa Romeo Commemorative Edition Spider among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters posed questions regarding the car's condition and history, showing genuine interest. @DavidinNC inquired about the air conditioning's efficiency and any cosmetic blemishes, while @RjwhitAlfa asked for close-ups of the leather seats and detailed any potential glass chips. @Jimcra also sought clarity on the vehicle's paint condition, indicating a desire for further information to make informed decisions. These inquiries reflect a cautious yet engaged interest in the vehicle, demonstrating that potential buyers are conducting thorough due diligence before considering a purchase.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's overall condition despite its low mileage. @franknAtl pointed out discrepancies in the wear on the driver's seat bolster, questioning if it matched the reported mileage. Another commenter, @euroscnut, expressed sadness that such a well-preserved car had not been driven more and warned of its aging tires, indicating potential issues for future use. The seller, @Judgejohn, attempted to address these negatives by offering to provide additional photos and clarifications, indicating a desire for transparency regarding the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @SaabSnob expressed love for the Mitsubishi Montero, citing it as one of the best SUVs ever made. @Benzin101 shared that they have owned a 2003 Limited model for over ten years, calling it their favorite vehicle. @28firefighter praised the truck for being well cared for and in immaculate condition despite its age. @Owen_03montero highlighted the clean example of the Montero with low miles and noted that these vehicles are well built and can last for many miles, reinforcing the sentiment surrounding its durability.
Neutral: @Tifighter (The Seller) provided detailed information about the vehicle's maintenance history and modifications, including the installation of an Alpine stereo system with Carplay, additional cameras for visibility, and a Kaon rear cargo shelf for extra storage. Concerns regarding the condition of the alignment bolts were raised by users, with @Thereddevil asking about oil consumption and alignment work, to which @Tifighter responded that there has been no notable oil consumption and that the alignment is not currently an issue. Various inquiries were made about the comfort of the front seats and the features included in the vehicle, indicating a genuine interest in its practical usability for potential buyers.
Negative: @Urbanista pointed out that the off-road tires might be noisy at speed and could affect fuel economy, leading to concerns about the vehicle's comfort on longer drives. @kedtrak291 requested additional photos and a video of the seats, raising concerns about the comfort level based on their previous experience with a Montero's driver seat. Some users expressed skepticism regarding the alignment bolts, with @geremio specifically asking if there had been any issues with seized hardware, indicating a level of caution among bidders about potential maintenance problems.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Overall, there seems to be a consensus among potential buyers expressing interest in understanding more about the vehicle's condition. @jwjohnston7630 highlighted that a startup and driving video would be particularly beneficial, as it would provide a real-time demonstration of how the vehicle performs. Such visual content can instill confidence in bidders and facilitate a more informed decision-making process.
Neutral: Comments from @Dino886 indicate a desire for more information regarding the vehicle's history, particularly asking about the duration of ownership by the previous long-term owner. This shows an acknowledgment that background information is important for potential buyers, but does not imply any positive or negative sentiment regarding the vehicle itself. Additionally, both commenters express a general curiosity about the vehicle's functional aspects, such as the air conditioning system.
Negative: There is an underlying concern conveyed by both @Dino886 and @jwjohnston7630 about the lack of available information and multimedia regarding the vehicle. The absence of comments and specific details from the seller raises questions about the seller's engagement and transparency, which might deter potential bidders. The inquiries regarding the AC's functionality and the request for videos suggest a lack of confidence in the information provided so far.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @VantageAuto mentions that the car is in truly immaculate condition with ultra low mileage, emphasizing that it is a fully loaded vehicle. @1992mustang2008 also praises the condition of the car, highlighting it as beautiful and in line with the high expectations set by Vantage Auto. @AZSkye shares their positive experience with the model, recalling their pleasure while renting it on vacation.
Neutral: @Rumenocity asked about the absence of adaptive cruise control, to which @AZSkye clarified that it likely did not exist at the time of this model's release. @Shihtzumom remarked that they traded their XTS for a newer CT6, noting their desire for a warranty due to concerns about potential issues with the older model. @USA1istakingcharge provided a note that you can indeed purchase warranties, mentioning their own experience with a newer XTS model that has adaptive cruise control.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle’s reliability were raised, with @Rumenocity noting the lack of adaptive cruise control and @Shihtzumom expressing reservations about owning an XTS without a warranty. Issues with the CUE screens were also mentioned by both @USA1istakingcharge and @Rumenocity, although @VantageAuto reassured potential buyers about the car's overall reliability and mentioned that remanufactured screen units are available if needed.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg expressed admiration for the vehicle's exterior, specifically noting that the Portimao Blue color is impressive and that the Oyster interior adds an element of class to the M440i. It showcases the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and suggests it stands out in terms of design.
Neutral: @Grantkal25 asked a straightforward question about the lien on the vehicle, which is a common inquiry among potential buyers seeking to understand any financial obligations associated with the purchase. This comment reflects a practical need for information.
Negative: @TampaGarage raised concerns regarding the tires and overall condition of the vehicle, inquiring if the tires were replaced when the wheels were straightened, and questioning whether there was any remaining vibration or damage to the suspension or undercarriage. This indicates hesitancy or caution regarding the vehicle’s mechanical status.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its appealing aesthetics and quality restoration. @Mark described it as a great-looking Defender 90, while @GBRBiLL noted its impressive condition and expected demand. Several participants appreciated the thorough updates completed by Tanc Barratt Restorations, including the modern A/C and Apple CarPlay installation, which cater to contemporary comfort standards. Commenters emphasized the vehicle's uniqueness due to its Italian heritage and military background, further enhancing its allure among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's specifications and updates were mixed but informative. @GBRBiLL and @MAK68 engaged with the seller about the engine's condition and modifications, leading to clarifications about the unmodified engine and original components. @Nebulas90 raised a question about the speedometer, which brought attention to the unique features of the Defender that correspond to its original use by the Italian Carabinieri, showcasing a blend of historical significance with technical discussion.
Negative: Although there were very few negative comments, some users inquired about specific aspects of the vehicle that may not meet their expectations. @Schmidty0101 questioned the presence of rear seatbelts, indicating a concern for safety that potential buyers might take into account. Additionally, both @MAK68 and @Nebulas90 asked about modifications and specifications, reflecting a cautious approach to the car's functionality and compliance with their preferences, which could suggest reservations among future buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @A7534 expresses that ownership of the vehicle has been entirely trouble-free, emphasizing its complicated nature yet reliable performance. @Wineguy65 shares fond memories of a previous model, labeling it as one of the best cars ever owned and hinting at a desire to buy another. @IMissMySaab provides a glowing review of the car's capabilities, noting its luxurious interior, fuel efficiency, and excellent towing capabilities. @rjcp1 also appreciates their similar vehicle, highlighting its durability and comfort while solidifying the vehicle's reputation for quality.
Neutral: @RussW (The Seller) clarifies that the vehicle is the executive model, the highest trim level of the Touareg, and lists its premium features like retractable sunshades and an upgraded stereo system. He also provides detailed maintenance records, confirming recent oil changes and repairs under warranty to reassure potential buyers. @Vintage64 inquires about additional features such as collision warning and the dynaudio system, showcasing potential customers' interest in specific vehicle capabilities.
Negative: Overall, there aren't many negative comments present; however, @317 raises a question about the mileage in a short period, which may imply concerns about the vehicle's usage history. One minor issue mentioned by @rjcp1 relates to emissions equipment warnings, though these were addressed under warranty, indicating that while maintenance might be needed, it has been adequately covered. The focus on needed repairs under warranty suggests some apprehension among potential customers about long-term reliability.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CarguyBigD remarks on the stunning interior of the vehicle, praising it as a 'cream puff.' @Avcat123 humorously engages with another user, indicating excitement for the auction, and @wolfekerr expresses enthusiasm about the vehicle despite feeling overwhelmed by the number of cars he currently owns.
Neutral: @aegmotorsports, the Seller, welcomes participants to the no reserve auction, highlighting the immaculate condition and unique features of the 2014 BMW 740i Individual. The Seller mentions various amenities, including leather upholstery and advanced technology features, providing detailed information about the vehicle's specifications and auction details, as well as answers to potential buyer inquiries.
Negative: However, @WonderlandCanyon critiques the Seller's use of nitrile gloves in measuring paint thickness as unnecessary, suggesting a lack of credibility in the approach. They note that while the Seller's marketing efforts may be overzealous, the car itself is nonetheless an attractive specimen. Additionally, @40Darrin's inquiry about the tires hints at concerns regarding their condition, but the Seller reassures him that the vehicle originally came with run flat tires and has been fitted with conventional tires for a better ride.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @stefon993 (The Seller) has highlighted that the 2004 Tacoma V6 TRD off-road truck is well-cared for and has been primarily used for highway commuting, indicating it has relatively low wear. The seller reassured potential buyers that everything on the truck functions properly, with no oil leaks or consumption, and noted the air conditioning works great. Additional comments praise the truck's good looks, with @Tweedyfish describing it as a "nice looking rig" and @FloridaCracker1996 complimenting the modifications made to the truck, like grill LED lights.
Neutral: Several inquiries from potential buyers like @JimKou and @some-time reflect a desire for more detailed information about the truck. Questions about the truck's operational specifics, potential modifications to return it to factory height, and bus photos for verification of potential dash pad damage have been raised. @stefon993 (The Seller) provided clarifications, confirming details about the TRD Off-Road Package, the ease of modifications, and the integrity of the truck's structural condition with no frame damage.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns that could deter potential buyers. @kedtrak291 inquired about the possibility of unnoticed damage, specifically regarding the presence of dents and alignment issues. @some-time also expressed concerns related to potential damage to the dash pad and the necessity of replacing shocks after modifying the suspension. Additionally, issues were raised about the truck’s gas mileage and the condition of its interior, prompting the seller to reassure that although the truck has a couple of minor cosmetic imperfections, it is mechanically solid and has no significant adult smells or previous damage.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Thirty-three-and-a-third describes the Camaro as awesome and nostalgic, stating it reminds him of high school and a friend's similar car. @Mike9000ft expresses strong admiration, enthusiastically branding the Camaro as 'bad to the bone,' despite being a Ford fan. @Adammarshall1983 compliments the old school build, emphasizing that the choice of rims is subjective and easily changeable.
Neutral: @Kingsize15 (The Seller) confirms that both the engine and transmission are new, and offers to provide pictures of the old wheels to prospective buyers. @JerryB67 asks the seller about the rear end gear ratio, and @Sil_80 suggests a likely ratio based on calculations, showcasing engagement in the technical aspects of the vehicle's specifications. The seller shares the RPMs at cruising speeds, giving potential buyers a sense of the car's performance during highway driving.
Negative: While many comments are positive, there are mentions of concerns regarding aesthetic choices. @MarkBartlett expresses a dislike for the 20” wheels, stating they detract from the Camaro's overall look. @JerryB67 indicates a preference for overdrive for more comfortable cruising, hinting at potential drawbacks in long-distance driving without it. @HotVette suggests that while the Camaro is gorgeous, it would benefit from further pictures of the car with its previous wheels for better insight.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @whoop_t commented positively on the vehicle, expressing that it is clean and indicating that his wife would enjoy using it for trips. @Pdigwig also had a positive reaction to the updates on the campervan, stating that it sounds awesome and acknowledging the seller's thorough maintenance efforts. Additionally, @ovdays (The Seller) assured potential buyers that all systems function properly and highlighted the reliability of the Dometic refrigerator replacement, noting it performs well even under challenging conditions without issues.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on specific features and conditions of the vehicle. For instance, @desertdave2 requested the seller to provide clearer photos of the Vehicle ID and build specifications due to visibility issues caused by a loose corner. @relsken inquired about the towing capacity, and @chrisallick asked whether the damage to the hood pad was cosmetic or functional. @Billy808 sought more details regarding a noted seepage in the transmission cooler line, expressing interest in repairs and asking about the A/C performance.
Negative: Some concerns about the vehicle were raised, primarily surrounding specific mechanical issues. @Pdigwig expressed potential worries about common issues such as timing chain noise and half shaft play, although he acknowledged the careful maintenance of the vehicle. @Billy808 asked detailed questions about the transmission seepage and also questioned whether the A/C was functioning well, suggesting a level of skepticism regarding the vehicle's upkeep. Overall, while the comments reflect a generally positive impression of the campervan, notable concerns about its mechanical reliability were present.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its uniqueness and potential. @CJ remarked that artifacts like this make them glad for platforms like Bring a Trailer, while @Lofty appreciated the design and hopes to see restoration work on it. Others like @floorit426 praised the inclusion of blueprints for the vehicle, suggesting that its restoration would be an engaging project for anyone willing to learn, such as @longhorizon.
Neutral: The seller, @Blueoval355, introduced the vehicle as a custom family heirloom available for auction, noting that it had been stored indoors for many years. Several users engaged with inquiries about the vehicle's components, such as the windshield's origin, while also discussing its historical significance. @TheVintageCarGuy and @BlitzLead sought clarity on specific features, showcasing a blend of curiosity and interest in the car's restoration potential.
Negative: There were hints of skepticism and concerns about the vehicle's condition and modifications. For instance, @Sparrownaut mentioned that such projects might lead owners to forget their initial motivations, and @RiddleysRides expressed confusion over certain design elements. Additionally, @KenKars suggested necessary bodywork and paint to enhance its appearance, implying that the vehicle may require significant restoration efforts to make it appealing.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @OutOfMyElement mentioned that the vehicle looks good despite having 300k miles, wishing luck to the seller. @nexusautobrokers (The Seller) enthusiastically highlighted their consistent range of 100 series vehicles, expressing eagerness for another sale. The seller also noted that this particular model is a rare find. Positive remarks about the car's performance and service history were made by @nexusautobrokers, especially emphasizing the enjoyable driving experience and service records available. @bripars40 shared a personal connection to the area, suggesting they might make a trip to drive the vehicle back to Oklahoma, indicating interest in the car. @nexusautobrokers offered to create videos showcasing the vehicle, highlighting their customer service focus.
Neutral: @Choopie inquired about a possible collection of high-mileage LXs, reflecting a general curiosity about the vehicle's background. Comments about technical aspects such as the timing belt and service record were raised by @Ocis10, who sought further details on maintenance items. The seller addressed these questions, assuring that the timing belt service includes the water pump and shared that the Carfax reports great service records despite the lack of documentation due to the car's age. @Sabath also requested maintenance suggestions for a potential cross-country trip, as well as video content, which the seller acknowledged and promised to provide.
Negative: @GreaterAjax questioned the condition of the dashboard in one of the pictures, perhaps indicating concerns about the vehicle's cosmetic condition. The seller responded with a lighthearted comment about the scratches being typical for a 300k mile vehicle. @Sabath further expressed concern over the rust visible in the images, asking for clarification on its severity and nature. The seller reassured that the rust was only surface-level, typical for a California vehicle, but acknowledged the presence of corrosion on the frame, which may signal underlying concerns for prospective buyers.
|
|
|