Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's quality and build. @Deano highlighted the low mileage and enjoyment from the previous owner, while @Hulk2000 praised the overall construction, specifically mentioning the impressive engine and body. @JustaGlitch called it 'Bad to the bone', indicating strong enthusiasm, and @wallyworld24 described a specific picture of the car as 'screen saver worthy', appealing to fellow Cobra enthusiasts. Overall, many comments reflect a sense of awe and appreciation for the car's craftsmanship and history.
Neutral: Several comments focused on technical aspects and details of the vehicle, such as tire specifications and build origin. @Dan_in_Reno raised a question about the tire's age, prompting @RickCollins (The Seller) to clarify that they were purchased recently. @EpicMC speculated about the origin of the alloy body, providing insights that sparked further discussion. @e004969 noted the dual battery installation and requested an explanation, emphasizing a learning interest among bidders. Most neutral comments were informative, seeking clarity rather than expressing overt opinions.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns or points of confusion regarding the vehicle. @ncs1 wondered about the absence of Shelby's signature on the dashboard, suggesting a disappointment for some collectors. Meanwhile, @atlshaver questioned the meaning of the large 'G' on the radiator, indicating a lack of clarity. Additionally, there was an expression of longing from @cowboybob, who experienced a moment of hope only to realize it was not his desired vehicle. This response illustrates how the auction can evoke mixed emotions for potential buyers.
 |
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments enthusiastically describe the 2009 Ferrari 430 Scuderia, noting its beautiful Rosso Scuderia color and striking interior design, which some even compare to that of a Formula 1 car. @Husseys described it as 'beautiful' and @Commander1 emphasized that driving one makes you feel alive. @GDogg and @ScottAz expressed their admiration for the vehicle's stunning appearance and thrilling performance. Additionally, @jwc62002 remarked on the car's appealing spec, while @Queuedcars echoed their love for the Scuderia, highlighting its rarity and how it stands out in the market.
Neutral: The seller, @RumbleAuto, actively engages with bidders and responds to inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition, including providing additional photos and service records upon request. Several commenters, including @brookfieldnest and @mike_747, request specific information about the car’s history, maintenance records, and any potential issues such as the condition of the headliner and the presence of a clear bra. The seller mentions they are gathering more detailed information and commitments to provide transparency throughout the auction process.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by users regarding the car's mechanical history and condition. @mike_747 noted potential clicking noises in a driving video, and @brookfieldnest expressed interest in the specifics of any accidents involving the car, particularly one that occurred early in its life. Users like @kwang and @wildcardgreg questioned the possibility of exhaust manifold issues, indicating that the car, while an impressive machine, may have underlying mechanical risks that have not been thoroughly checked. These worries were voiced in the context of assessing the vehicle’s overall condition before a potential purchase.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle as a beautiful and exceptional example, highlighting its rarity and excellent condition. @DKH8 described it as "one of the most rare models," while @SpartyRob noted its perfection and beautiful design, pointing out that there aren't many 964 widebodies that are not turbo. @motobikemike emphasized the vehicle's impressive one-owner history, and @RaceGP1 acknowledged it as a well-optioned, low mileage car that's a collector's dream. Overall, the comments reflect a strong admiration for the car's aesthetics and value.
Neutral: There were inquiries regarding additional information about the vehicle, such as photos of the tool roll and jack, made by @abbcaz and @beckseuropean. @sixspeed71 expressed interest in viewing the car in person, to which @genevamotorcars (The Seller) confirmed that it is available for viewing in their showroom. Additionally, discussions around the auction process included comments about the presence of a reserve price, with @kawub4ik questioning this, while @genevamotorcars clarified the owner's decision to maintain a reserve.
Negative: Some comments hinted at concerns about the auction's authenticity or transparency. For instance, @kawub4ik questioned the lack of a no-reserve auction, which prompted a response from @genevamotorcars. There were also indications of irrelevant or non-constructive comments, as pointed out by another user regarding @KBonTX's comment. In general, while the overall feedback was positive, there were a few neutral observations and questions about the auction's format.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @RaceGP1 shared their enthusiasm for the Z8, likening it to something out of a Bond film and calling it unique and fun. @CraZ8 appreciated the modifications made to the vehicle, specifically praising the new attractive rims and the performance enhancements from the Quaife planetary LSD. There were several comments highlighting the stunning wheels and beautiful aesthetics of the car, with @grb1 calling it a beautiful piece with an appealing color combination, and @GreggRLewis expressing a desire to have a set of wheels for their own vehicle. Additionally, @Ericmaas noted that the car might increase in value due to its rarity and color combination, while @LongiMotorsports described it as their dream specs, reminiscing about a childhood ride in a similar model.
Neutral: @Roadrunner_CT raised a question about the specifications in the listing, noting that they believed all Z8s were manual except for the Alpina versions. @Scott_S provided context on the vehicle's availability in both manual and automatic options for the 2003 model year. @2112 and @Ludwig_Mazmanian discussed the wheels, with @Ludwig_Mazmanian confirming the original wheels are included with the sale even though they are stored at a different location. @p-38 inquired about the original wheels, reflecting interest in all aspects of the vehicle's authenticity, while @Peter_69 was waiting for a response to their private message regarding the car.
Negative: While the comments were largely positive, there were no overtly negative remarks about the vehicle itself. However, @TSR90210 noted that BMW seems to have lost their vision for this type of car, implying a sentiment that contemporary vehicles lack the same charm and character as the Z8. There was also a mention of missing items such as a coffee book and a telephone, which @Ludwig_Mazmanian confirmed are not included with the car, possibly disappointing prospective buyers who value completeness in classic cars.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg describes the vehicle as a beautiful 220S that shows its age well, showcasing how the long-term ownership has maintained the paint and interior. He suggests it's ready for practical use, like heading to the golf course. @Dollycat3 appreciates the car's gorgeous appearance and highlights its beautiful interior and wooden details. @brakeservo emphasizes the construction and design quality of the 220S, noting that the vehicle appears to be well-preserved and indicative of loving ownership. @UncleFred1 complements the car's deep red paint and driver condition while sharing his appreciation for how it has been used as a family car. @RogerD calls it a classy ride, admiring its design despite noting a few rough areas. @TJC45 conveys sheer excitement at the sight of such cars.
Neutral: @conquestclassiccars (The Seller) expresses gratitude for the interest in the vehicle and confirms that video content will be shared shortly, reassuring potential bidders about the vehicle's upkeep and detailing despite some minor moisture seen in initial photos. @Jgrahamdmd echoes UncleFred1’s sentiments about the car's condition, providing additional context and verifying his observations through a cohesive reiteration. @Frank_Barrett notes his experience with the vehicle, discussing past restorations and parts sourcing while describing the overall solid condition but suggesting a few improvements.
Negative: Several commenters raised concerns about potential issues. @Number_Six pointed out that while the car looks solid initially, it likely needs suspension bushings and mentioned rust under the trunk lid as a red flag. @Urbanista asked about the boot gasket, expressing concerns about possible rust damage. @Jgrahamdmd shared his own experiences regarding shifting difficulties that could arise from worn-out mounts and advised against using aftermarket parts. @High_Hope, while praising the car's craftsmanship, indicated that it deserves more than the current bid of $5200, implying the undervaluation may reflect underlying concerns.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @conquestclassiccars (The Seller) describes the Honda MT125R as an incredibly rare find, noting its compelling ownership history and limited operation time. Commentator @Mitchy2000 reminisces about racing the bike in the early eighties, indicating the fun and excitement it brought. @Vtec4ever suggests sending the bike to the Honda museum in Japan, underscoring its uniqueness and historical significance. @Penguinracing also appreciates the rarity of seeing one that is essentially unused and unridden, adding to its appeal as a piece of Honda's history.
Neutral: @MrHonda1948 provides a historical insight about the bike's evolution, mentioning that a subsequent model featured advancements like liquid cooling and a hydraulic disc brake. @jeffball points out the retail pricing of the MT125R in comparison to the CR125, which adds context to its market value. @ringo123 argues that a motorcycle produced by Honda Racing, with only 400 units made, is indeed rare and valuable, suggesting a collective sentiment of respect for its status among motorcycles.
Negative: @WERA22 expresses that the bike is not particularly rare or valuable, suggesting that it might be overlooked despite being awesome for vintage racing. @t54 counters a comment about its rarity by stating that the Honda museum already has sufficient examples, and many are available at low prices worldwide. @Rosen12berg regrets selling his bike and reflects on its original gel coat, illustrating the nostalgia that some former owners might feel. Overall, there are mixed feelings regarding the bike's rarity and value, leading some to believe it could be more significant than others suggest.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments appreciate the aesthetic appeal and potential of the 190E 2.6, highlighting its good condition and unique features. @GDogg admires the Pearl Black over Parchment color combination and the original window sticker, while @Harrdware emphasizes the car's rarity and performance benefits due to its six-cylinder engine. Commenters like @Undertaker and @Luv_Co2 recognize the vehicle's strong characteristics and original condition, valuing the car for its unique qualities and potential unlike newer models.
Neutral: Some comments suggest minor edits and observations rather than outright criticisms. @Adalbert recommends a specific description improvement regarding the sheepskin covers, while @Rotors acknowledges the seller's efforts to maintain the car and suggests that there is an audience for it among enthusiasts. @Garwa (The Seller) provides background on the car's ownership and maintenance history, expressing a desire to sell to someone who appreciates its quirks. Additionally, @reibrown shares a personal connection to the brand, enhancing the discussion about the car's legacy.
Negative: Several commenters express concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly over the state of the engine bay, which is described as neglectful. @JustaGlitch and @W201Owner point out substantial issues that could hurt the car's selling price, stressing the importance of proper cleaning and detailing. @Rotors brings attention to potential oil leaks and issues related to the M103 engine, urging the seller to present the vehicle in better condition to attract bidders, while @W201Owner suggests that the seller's lack of action on minor details could signify neglect to potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle, highlighting its stunning beauty and craftsmanship. @stugottz expressed delight with a simple 'Outrageous Cougar...😍', while @OKSnake08 noted that he would normally pass on convertibles, but would make an exception for this 'sweet kitty'. @hdfinder47 acknowledged the current owner's impressive restoration efforts, mentioning how the car transformed from 'excellent quality driver' to 'Oh. My. Goodness.' Additionally, @Webuyguitars1 vouched for the seller's trustworthiness, stating that the owner is a perfectionist who ensures quality.
Neutral: Some comments offered factual information and interests without strong emotional attachment. @jsv (The Seller) clarified that the CJ markings on the hood were standard for the 1969 and 1970 Cougars equipped with the 428CJ engine. Various other commenters, like @Ranchero65 and @Schofy123, provided insights into the market value and their experiences but did not express personal desire to buy, creating a neutral perspective on the car's desirability. @TargaTaco asked for specifics regarding the convertible top's mechanics and materials, indicating curiosity rather than immediate interest in purchasing.
Negative: Conversely, a few comments offered critiques or indifference. @boss2man admitted to never being a fan of the 69-70 Cougars but acknowledged this particular one as special due to its documentation and restoration quality. @d_juhasz questions the refund policy of the redline tire wheel combination while others, like @finleyleadbetter, focused on the need for better images of the undercarriage, indicating skepticism or a watchful approach rather than full endorsement. Elsewhere, @federall expressed confusion over the use of terms in the listing, which signifies a lack of clarity rather than outright negativity.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Rojer007 commented that the Bricklin looks really nice, and @johnnyvett stated that if someone wants a Bricklin, this is the one to get, especially noting the great color and the presence of a clutch pedal. @frantav327 highlighted the extreme rarity of these cars, pointing out that there were less than 3000 Bricklins manufactured and that this specific model seems to be a beautiful example, expressing enthusiasm for the sale. @nexusautobrokers also expressed admiration, wishing the seller good luck. Additionally, @laffman reminisced fondly about a family member's Bricklin and praised its gullwing doors, showing appreciation for the nostalgia connected to the car.
Neutral: Several comments inquire about specific details regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @zbgy1 asked about stress cracks in the acrylic panels and the manufacturer of the air door system. @CALI_Dreaming requested information regarding the repairs necessary for the air conditioning system, hinting that visible damage could be part of the required repairs. Notably, @SV1Bricklin, the seller, addressed inquiries about the condition of the car, detailing the restoration history and mentioning the need for an AC recharge, while clarifying that the drive train was completed during the restoration without receipts available. Other commenters, such as @jacopelle and @Koba, brought up concerns regarding color consistency and previous work done by repair shops, showing a blend of curiosity and polite criticism about the car's condition.
Negative: However, there are also negative comments referencing flaws in the vehicle. @jacopelle pointed out issues with color consistency of the acrylic, stating that both front fenders have a grey cast and identifying a potential problem with the driver door. Furthermore, @CALI_Dreaming echoed that both doors appear to be damaged, suggesting this is a common issue with Bricklins. Other comments reflected skepticism about the quality of repairs and the overall condition of the restoration efforts, as @Koba stressed their hesitation to purchase a Bricklin unless it had undergone work by a trusted restoration shop. @Chops inquired about the finish of the vehicle, suspected inconsistencies, leading to further discussions on the quality and appearance of the car.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect a high level of enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its stunning build quality and aesthetics. @boaboyoz described it as a "stunning Bronco" and praised the phenomenal build. @jeffmayfield expressed admiration, calling it an incredible Bronco while engaging in a thoughtful inquiry about its registration process. @dj_walls2424 went further to commend the build as extremely clean, indicating that the craftsmanship is recognized and appreciated by potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters sought additional information regarding the vehicle's features and specifications. @FourCrowns and @CWMcN asked about lift height and operational features, respectively. @GasolineAlleyGarage (The Seller) answered these queries thoroughly, providing detailed measurements and reassurances about the functionality of the Bronco. The seller also elaborated on the registration process for the vehicle, explaining how it maintains its classification as a 1966 model despite being newly built.
Negative: There were some concerns raised, particularly regarding the safety feature of the roll bar installation as mentioned by @biker_60. Though @Molae65 provided insight about the design similarities with older models, it hinted at a gap in protection compared to more modern safety standards. However, overall, the tone of the comments remained positive as most participants focused on their admiration and curiosity rather than expressing significant negativity.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, emphasizing its uniqueness and potential as a project car. @dtlease, the seller, shared personal sentiment about the car and hopes that someone will appreciate it as much as he does. Additionally, @mark_99 praised the vehicle's streamlined design and suggested personalized interior modifications. Several users, such as @Fatboydave, echoed the sentiment that the car has character and will stand out wherever it goes, hinting at its appeal to collectors or enthusiasts in search of something distinctive.
Neutral: Several comments highlighted aspects that could enhance the vehicle's presentation. @history350 mentioned a wish for a driving video to better understand the car's performance, a point that @dtlease acknowledged he would address. Users like @GarageEnvy appreciated the vehicle's aesthetic but expressed concerns about it spending too much time in a garage, reflecting a common apprehension about project cars. There was a general acknowledgment of the time and resources invested into the car, with suggestions for further improvements without explicit criticisms of the current state.
Negative: Some comments illustrated skepticism regarding the vehicle's functionality and completeness. @hr47cars pointed out that despite the investment of time and money, aspects like the interior could be improved, hinting at a lack of polish. Additionally, comments like @Knucklehead47's inquiry about the presence of an air conditioning compressor suggested that there might be considerations regarding practicality that need addressing. Overall, a portion of remarks pointed to deficiencies or uncertainties that could deter potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @FirstClassExotics indicated that the vehicle runs smoothly and excels on the highway, which suggests a positive driving experience. The seller assures potential buyers that the Range Rover has no major defects or mechanical issues and is ready for many more miles, which instills confidence in its performance. Additionally, the oil and filter were recently changed, which is a good indicator of maintenance and preparedness for sale.
Neutral: @IMD raised several questions regarding the condition of the vehicle, including inquiries about the brake pads, rotors, tires, timing chain, air suspension, accident history, and any engine or suspension problems. These questions are typical for prospective buyers seeking to ensure the vehicle's reliability before making a purchase, reflecting an interest in its overall condition. The concerns expressed by other commentors, such as @Mongoose55 and @abtally123, further inquire about the vehicle's history and any inspections, suggesting that buyers are cautious and seeking transparency.
Negative: @Mongoose55 expressed concern over potentially troubling information linked to the vehicle, implying that there may be issues that the seller hasn't fully disclosed. This sentiment was echoed by @abtally123, who questioned the history of the vehicle, including its auction acquisition and the need for inspection reports, which could indicate a lack of trust in the seller's statements. Overall, while the seller claims the vehicle is in excellent shape, the concerns raised by commenters hint at a wariness regarding the vehicle's true condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle for its impressive performance and features. @Barryward remarked that driving the Mazdaspeed eliminates the need for other distractions, while @11michaelm (The Seller) asserted that the car may be the finest Mazdaspeed turbo MX-5 in the country, highlighting its perfect mechanical functioning. @VdUbLuV appreciated the balance of power and weight in the Mazdaspeed Miata, expressing a desire for it to be their dream garage partner. @Philpug endorsed the seller's meticulous care for their vehicle, assuring potential buyers of a good investment.
Neutral: Several comments addressed specific features and inquiries about the car. @Charlie1063 inquired about shipping options, and @joejoeman1987 confirmed the quality of the Marrad seats, noting their superior lateral support compared to the original stock seats. Additionally, @Dnwright6 asked about the vehicle's usage on track, leading to a detailed response from @11michaelm (The Seller) about its minimal track use and the upkeep of components like the timing belt and water pump, which were replaced recently.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some commenters regarding the modifications and specifications of the vehicle. @BeeManGT3 questioned the specifics of the car's performance sounds and requested further verification on crucial maintenance items, including the timing belt replacement and tire conditions. @norwoods sought clarity on whether the safety roll bar met SCCA specifications, and @PullG pointed out potential compliance issues. @Jerryteal711 shared a personal experience about challenges with temporary tags, adding to the concerns raised about necessary legal documentation for driving the vehicle out of state.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @bowtie6772 described the truck as beautiful, expressing appreciation for the owner's modifications while also respecting the original engine. @Moonrunner1972 praised the color and upgrades made to the truck, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @cjs66Mustang found the truck to be an unpretentious pickup, highlighting its great color combo and longevity for such a classic vehicle. @tlcamg commended the early high numbers for the truck, signaling a positive anticipation for the auction's outcome. @GreenK10 also emphasized the beauty of the truck, particularly noting the documentation as exemplary. @belotface appreciated the job done on the truck, inquiring about measurements, reflecting interest in its specifications. @BeastRig referred to the vehicle as a beast, which attests to its robust nature.
Neutral: @Mr.Majestyk asked clarifying questions about the truck's specifications, including its short bed size and functionality of the electrical components and 4x4 operation. The seller, @CoClassics, confirmed that the truck is a short bed and that all electrical aspects are functioning correctly while addressing inquiries regarding the factory AM radio and providing the truck's dimensions. @muddymogriffin sought information about the replacement 350 CI engine, expressing curiosity about its provenance and performance, indicating a neutral stance as they gather more data.
Negative: Overall, there were minimal negative comments regarding the truck. @Mr.Majestyk's inquiry about the central speaker under the dash suggests a potential concern over missing components that may affect the original specification of the truck. The inquiries about the drivetrain from @muddymogriffin and the mention of only the truck's original paint being visible in @CoClassics' comments may raise questions for buyers regarding the vehicle's modifications and history. However, these comments do not necessarily reflect disapproval but rather a desire for more information.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CBodden expresses enthusiasm for the Boxster, highlighting its engineering and design, describing it as a well-performing mid-engine sports car that offers comfort and practicality. @convertparts shares their personal enjoyment of their 2013 S manual Boxster, claiming it significantly enhances one’s driving experience. @Valiantjim reflects fondly on his initial test drive of the 981, appreciating its capabilities even if he would prefer a different exhaust configuration. Overall, many comments celebrate the Boxster's driving experience, superb quality, and attractive design, indicating a strong appreciation for the car.
Neutral: @powertechselect (The Seller) provides detailed background on the vehicle, highlighting that it was recently purchased from the original owner and emphasizing its cleanliness along with the dealership's reputation for specializing in Porsches. Several commenters, including @CallMeSniperX, inquire about service records and condition specifics, to which the seller responds that there are no oil leaks and recent maintenance has been performed. The comments from various participants indicate a general interest in the car's history and upkeep, suggesting balanced curiosity and consideration about the purchase.
Negative: @CallMeSniperX raises a concern about potential oil leaks and the recent service history, reflecting a cautious perspective that contrasts with the overall enthusiasm found in other comments. @Valiantjim mentions a personal aesthetic preference regarding the exhaust configuration of the car, signaling a desire for modifications. While the general tone remains positive, these remarks highlight some typical buyer hesitations associated with used vehicles, underscoring a desire for clarity on both mechanical and cosmetic aspects before purchase.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @DANick mentioned that they have a Spice Orange MINI Clubman and praised the color, expressing their excitement enthusiastically with GLWA! @Manhattan1 highlighted the exceptional collection of photos of the vehicle, noting that it embodies everything a Mini should be and expressing a desire to own one again, especially for a cross-country drive to Virginia.
Neutral: @maw06 shared their satisfaction with the replacement of the oil filter housing gasket, identifying it as a common problem in Mini vehicles. They acknowledged that while the gasket is inexpensive, the labor costs can be high due to the complexity of the repair. @hieptran inquired about the current condition of the car, specifically asking about oil leaks and any maintenance or repairs needed.
Negative: @hieptran's questions suggest a concern regarding potential issues with the vehicle, reflecting a level of skepticism about its condition. However, @1993-300CE-Cab., the Seller, reassured @hieptran that there are no issues with the car, confirming that it is currently maintained by a Mini specialist without any problems.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters appreciate the vehicle's overall beauty and condition, with @jeffs3820 describing it as a beautiful car and @cutoosunny receiving positive feedback about the colors and originality from @saccocounter1976. Many have praised the vehicle's reliability, with @Ocis10 sharing their personal experience of driving a similar 1984 model for 800 miles without issues. Furthermore, @D_Federico called it 'clean asf', highlighting its excellent preservation.
Neutral: Several commenters seek more information and clarification about the car's mechanical condition. @briga221 has inquired about various functionalities, including the radio, lights, and fuel gauge, while @cutoosunny has assured that everything is working properly except for the analog clock, which is inoperable. The seller has acknowledged the need for more videos and updates, responding to requests from potential buyers and addressing their inquiries.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the car's heating system, with @Roylee and @cavcal asking about overheating issues. Various commenters want to see specific video evidence of the vehicle's cold start and engine performance to assure its mechanical integrity. @briga221 expressed wariness, stating that while the car looks good, appearances can be deceiving, and emphasized the need for detailed insights before committing to a purchase.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Lwguelfo (The Seller) has provided detailed information about the vehicle, confirming recent maintenance work and the installation of new tires as of June 1, 2022, with less than 4000 miles since. This suggests the car has been well-cared for. Furthermore, he mentions that the car was inspected by a Jaguar dealer and has had no issues since purchase, which adds to the confidence in the vehicle's reliability. Additionally, @Bartruff1 praises the car's aesthetic appeal, describing it as exceptionally beautiful with a clean design.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @MPR and @vmaxie22, seek clarification on specific aspects of the vehicle's condition, particularly concerning the front bumper and potential leaks. They ask about the history of maintenance and potential mechanical issues, indicating a desire for transparency in the vehicle's history. @MPR's inquiries about modifications and the condition of components such as the chrome grill and transmission reflect a thorough approach to understanding the vehicle's present state.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's history, with @vmaxie22 highlighting that it is currently listed as the seventh owner, which can be seen as a red flag for potential buyers. @bpetersen5 mentions issues related to the 2003 model's motor, indicating it could have serious problems with the plastic chain tensioners that are specific to certain VINs. @vmaxie22's repeated questioning about leaks further underscores a lack of confidence about the vehicle's condition, suggesting that potential buyers should exercise caution.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The GMC SLT K3500 Ext Cab Dually has garnered positive attention for its remarkable condition, with many comments praising its beauty and quality. @DStone4320 (The Seller) highlighted that the truck is a 'true barn find' with only 750 miles driven in the last decade, asserting that it has been properly inspected, serviced, and runs flawlessly. Commenters like @GMT400Man described it as a 'beautiful truck,' expressing regret about not being able to bid on it themselves, which suggests a high level of admiration among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments raised questions or points of clarification regarding the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @Killerstwin inquired about the necessity of replacing the lifters and push rods at only 45,000 miles, prompting @eddie046 to share a similar experience from a previous GMC model. @Chipper55 requested further information about the brake system, indicating interest among potential buyers to verify the truck's maintenance and adequacy before bidding. @DStone4320 (The Seller) responded diligently to all inquiries, emphasizing transparency in the selling process.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding the truck's prior use and maintenance. @eddie046 expressed a suspicion that the lifters and related repairs might relate to a common issue seen in other GMC models, which raises questions about the truck's reliability. Additionally, @Chipper55 pointed out missing documentation regarding the brake system repairs, which is a critical consideration for buyers. Although these comments reflect hesitancy, they were addressed by @DStone4320 (The Seller) to alleviate concerns.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dheffel1 shares enthusiasm for the Q5, expressing regret over not purchasing it sooner and highlighting its sportiness and excellent fuel efficiency, averaging 35 mpg. @Mistytoo69 (The Seller) appreciates the supportive comments and bids, explaining that their family would have kept the car if they hadn’t already bought a new vehicle. @Mistytoo69 also underscores the pristine condition of the Q5, mentioning it has been well-maintained and garaged its entire life without any rust, indicating that it offers a unique driving experience for enthusiasts. The Seller emphasizes the quality craftsmanship and performance of the German-manufactured vehicle.
Neutral: @Bcf1061 raises valid questions regarding the status of the dieselgate warranty and tire conditions, to which @Mistytoo69 responds with details on the warranty expiration and the relatively new tires that have only been used for about 8k miles. @Mistytoo69 also mentions the average fuel efficiency and clarifies the importance of using the right type of diesel fuel, sharing their experience related to maintenance and operation, which provides potential buyers with essential information about ownership and operational costs.
Negative: Concerns arise from @Bcf1061 and others about the vehicle's maintenance history, specifically regarding the Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) status, highlighting an aspect of uncertainty in the long-term upkeep of the Q5 TDI. @41togo notes the mystery often associated with diesel vehicles and raises questions about smog checks and routine maintenance compared to gas models, suggesting potential apprehension among buyers. The contrast between the Q5 and Cayenne diesel markets is also touched upon, indicating that while the Q5 is favored for its smaller size, there may still be reservations about diesel reliability in everyday use.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle's aesthetic appeal was highlighted by @greenerdays11 (The Seller), who described the 'Aegean Blue' color over stone leather as truly popping in the sun. They also emphasized the car's excellent driving condition, stating it drives like butter and is a low-mile example ready for enjoyment. @greenerdays11 (The Seller) provided videos demonstrating the smooth operation of the vehicle's top, which seems to satisfy requests for demonstrations of its functionality.
Neutral: Several comments focused on requests for additional information and materials regarding the vehicle. @edwardgrzzz asked for driving videos and improved undercarriage photos, while @Rich421 requested the tire dates, tread measurements, and details about the brakes. @greenerdays11 (The Seller) responded positively to these requests, indicating they would provide the requested videos and photos, showing a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @TimV64 regarding the damaged odometer display, though @greenerdays11 (The Seller) assured that there were no issues and that it would be fixed. @TurboTomj and @Rich421 expressed a need for additional specific details about the vehicle, such as tire date codes and brake conditions, suggesting that some information may not have been clearly presented initially. Overall, while there were some requests for clarification, the seller appeared to address these concerns promptly.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @alfriedesq expressed excitement to see a Ferrari that has been well-enjoyed, contrasting with their own experience of keeping their car in the garage. @Tombo62 called the vehicle a good-looking example and noted that it has an iconic specification but requires a complete service to maximize enjoyment. @Americo08 described the car as beautiful and praised @KSP888 (The Seller) as one of BAT's most trusted sellers, while @CBaller agreed that it is a perfect car from a perfect seller, reflecting a strong confidence in the vehicle's appeal among prospective buyers.
Neutral: @KSP888 (The Seller) provided a detailed overview of the auction, mentioning that the single-owner Ferrari 308 GTS has a rolled odometer and is a solid driver. The car has undergone some essential servicing, including changes to oil, brake fluid, and transmission fluid as recently as 101,116 km. However, it was noted that the air conditioning is not currently functional, which may need attention from the buyer, and that documentation and original literature from previous ownership are lacking, as confirmed by the seller. Additionally, the seller has welcomed inquiries and recommended potential buyers to contact them directly if they have queries about the car or the auction process.
Negative: Commenters raised concerns regarding the car's belt replacement intervals, pointing out that the old belts should likely be changed, regardless of the mileage on the car. @Slick51 and @isolovers highlighted that best practices suggest replacing belts every 5 years or after specified mileage, while @ChevyDave criticized the conflicting information available about timing belt maintenance, urging others to cite sources for verification. @KSP888 (The Seller) acknowledged this uncertainty regarding the AC issue, implying further service may be needed which could deter some buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a lot of positive attention, with @Dollycat3 calling it a "beautiful TSI" and @zdoctor praising it as "SUPER CLEAN… very very nice," highlighting its rarity. @dougl33 remarked on its scarcity, noting that such vehicles are not commonly seen anymore. @BettertoBurnout expressed admiration for its well-maintained condition and low mileage, reminiscing about their own experience with a similar model that was a joy to drive. @Vtec4ever even declared it "probably the coolest sports car of the 1980s," emphasizing Mitsubishi's former stature in the automotive market.
Neutral: Several comments provided neutral observations about the car's mechanical aspects and user experiences. @motorcarmarketusa (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the vehicle's turbo setup and mileages, explaining that the owner has a collection of rarely-driven cars and confirming that the turbo sounds are characteristic of the factory setup. They also addressed a question about rust spots noted by @Michellehrand, clarifying that the corrosion was due to moisture retention from factory underbody paint. Additionally, @motorcarmarketusa confirmed there were no mechanical issues reported by other users inquiring about noises during ignition and driving conditions.
Negative: On the downside, some concerns were raised regarding potential mechanical issues. @FatKat questioned the likelihood of the car having remained at the same mileage for years, while @poacher raised issues about checkups for the turbo and potential boost leak. @Michellehrand expressed concern over visible corrosion and wondered about its implications for the vehicle's longevity. Furthermore, a few users, such as @Chassispuke, inquired about the transmission, indicating a desire to understand any existing problems. The seller's responses suggest transparency and a desire to address these worries, maintaining an informative dialogue with potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed great admiration and excitement about the vehicle, highlighting its stunning specifications and overall presence. @galevin described it as a great car, praising its potential to be even better with bold SVJ branding, while @GDogg called it a "magnificent" piece of automotive art, using terms like "holy wow" and "bellissima" to convey his awe. @boaboyoz and @RaceGP1 also echoed these sentiments, noting the car's beauty and desirability, with @RaceGP1 mentioning that its presence alone justifies a high price tag. The seller, @LamboHouston, ensured that interested buyers would have the opportunity to buy with a warranty option, adding to the car's appeal.
Neutral: Several comments provided practical questions and answers regarding the vehicle's features and purchasing options. @rmwcali asked about the possibility of viewing the car and inquired about warranty options, to which @LamboHouston provided clear answers, detailing the car's service history and warranty add-on. @nhhbbfan brought up the title processing for buyers residing in Montana, showing that there are logistical aspects buyers need to consider. Overall, these discussions reflect an engaged community seeking clarity on important aspects of the vehicle before bidding.
Negative: On the downside, some comments pointed to concerns regarding the high maintenance costs associated with owning the vehicle. @06Sapper humorously remarked about the $9,000 oil change, which some saw as a deterrent to ownership, reflecting a reality that potential buyers may find off-putting. @porsche1986 also noted the vehicle's mileage as a reason for opting out of bidding, suggesting that the limited use of the car might impact its value proposition for some buyers. This mixture of excitement and practical caution illustrates the complexities of luxury vehicle ownership.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight a consensus on the exceptional quality of the 2008 Porsche 911 Turbo, especially its original condition and low mileage of only 18,000 miles. @GDogg praises the car for being "Fantastic" in both color and specification. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) emphasizes the rarity of finding such a nice and original example and lauds it as the friendliest supercar on the market. Commenters appreciate the commitment of the seller to providing smooth transactions and facilitating inspections, underscoring the positive experience with Collectible Classics.
Neutral: There are discussions around the transmission of the vehicle, focusing particularly on the 5-speed Tiptronic automatic transmission. @alfriedesq expresses a preference for the manual transmission for its engagement, while also acknowledging that the Tiptronic functions well. @Haug shares a positive experience with tracking a 997.1 with Tiptronic but mentions that their personal preference leans towards manual. The technical aspects of the Tiptronic transmission are debated among commenters, with technical benefits noted by @schreyguy and others.
Negative: While the comments are largely positive, some criticisms arise regarding the transmission choice. @alfriedesq expresses dissatisfaction with the automatic option, stating it detracts from the driving experience, which he feels is more engaging with a manual transmission. @bmdaia and @AlexanderE engage in a disagreement about the transmission's origins and capabilities, with claims that it is not as robust as other options like PDK. Overall, there are mixed feelings about the Tiptronic's performance, with some labeling it as less desirable for serious driving enthusiasts.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @natkingcolebasket69 described the seats as an acquired taste but found the car beautiful, a sentiment echoed by @sixspeed71 who immediately appreciated the seats' aesthetics. @GDogg called it one of the nicest FFs he has seen, and @boaboyoz enthusiastically stated that the FF is a 'sublime' and 'divine' model, highlighting its superb spec. @SlowNRusty admired the car's overall appearance, specifically the colors and the panoramic roof, while congratulating the owner for maintaining it well. @Dollycat3 declared the FF as absolutely gorgeous and recognized it as one of her favorite Ferrari models.
Neutral: @OTSandCo, the seller, provided detailed maintenance records, stating that the previous owner bought the FF in 2020 and has used it regularly, clocking in about 22,000 miles since with careful upkeep. @S70_2 and @MMWX inquired about the vehicle's PTU and DCT transmissions, seeking confirmation on their service history, which @OTSandCo addressed. Overall, there was discussion around the FF's practical aspects and how it balances performance with usability, as mentioned by @NineNinetyThree993 who described it as a ‘controversial’ yet practical choice.
Negative: Conversely, some comments raised concerns about specific issues. @Mike47 questioned potential rattles, referring to past issues with seat belts on similar models. @Scomcc01 inquired about the front lift feature that was confirmed missing, while @Siowner expressed disappointment over the lack of a trunk hatch for practicality. Additionally, @MMWX expressed concerns regarding necessary maintenance recommendations that may have been overlooked. Interestingly, @waxbean2000 compared the FF’s shape to that of a Mazda 3, suggesting a level of dissatisfaction with its design.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Barryward admires the vehicle even in the dark, showcasing its appeal. @CobraVic11 agrees, stating it's a clean-looking Mark that deserves a 'white glove award'. @Dollycat3 echoes this sentiment, calling it a beautiful low mileage Mark IV. The vehicle attracts attention for its vintage style, particularly from @Rapallo who expresses love for big 70s cars and praises the color combination from @2472eogs, connecting it to nostalgic moments from 'The Rockford Files'. Overall, the car is appreciated for its looks and historical significance, as highlighted by several commenters.
Neutral: @Campbell53, the seller, provides responses to specific inquiries about the vehicle. They clarify that the HVAC control module needs rebuilding and detail that the A/C needs to be recharged due to this issue. The battery has been replaced recently, and the cruise control is inoperative due to a wiring issue. @Marauderman428 appreciates the transparency regarding the repairs made and questions whether assistance will be available for the new owner in addressing outstanding issues. The seller confirms that the car is owned by the dealership and not on consignment, reflecting a genuine connection to the vehicle's history.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about the vehicle's functionality, particularly by @Zoraspride who questions the need for the HVAC control module rebuild and the sluggish cranking despite a new battery. @MSS400 also seeks clarification about any visible rust and overall driving experience, highlighting apprehensions about potential defects on a white car. Additionally, @Pchmotoho comments on the owner's storage challenges, indicating a potential strain of handling the vehicle while needing to maintain space for other cars. These critiques and the mention of necessary repairs suggest that while the vehicle has charm, it requires significant work before reaching optimal condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @gccch commented on the remarkable cleanliness of the truck, noting that it is amazingly clean underneath given its age and mileage. @silverfx4 described the truck as a nice little vehicle that is basic and reliable, suggesting that it meets the needs of many potential buyers. The seller, @carchasers, introduced the vehicle as a hard-to-find model with a unique history, indicating its original title to the Ford Motor Company as a show vehicle, and expressed willingness to engage with potential buyers throughout the auction.
Neutral: @ZEM inquired about the driver seat recline/seat back lever, indicating some concern about a missing part. @Mikerees1 asked about the simplicity of replacing the lever, suggesting that the issue may be manageable. Furthermore, @goandsurf raised a question about a potential issue with the door and cabin light, indicating that it may be a common problem among this model but still finding the truck cool overall.
Negative: @goandsurf's concern about the door and cabin light points to possible issues with the truck, indicating that it might deter some buyers. Additionally, @corboto inquired about the timing belt replacement, suggesting additional maintenance concerns that could affect buyer perception. Even though the truck has positive attributes, these issues may raise red flags for potential purchasers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its condition and maintenance history. @kgt0001 described it as a 'Beautiful STI.' @VansFromJapan, the seller, mentioned that the vehicle has been owned for nearly 15 years by the proprietor of a Subaru specialty shop, indicating that it has been well-maintained. This background assures potential buyers about the quality of care the vehicle has received, adding a level of trust to the auction.
Neutral: There were also neutral inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifications and history. @Honduhh asked about the vehicle's ability to pass smog tests in California, while @PassionoftheCars questioned the discrepancy between the reported mileage on different parts of the listing. @Boosted360 inquired about the details concerning the car's past accidents and whether the paint or engine was affected. Seller comments clarified these aspects by explaining the car's mileage and accident history, indicating that the information provided was clear, though some might find it a bit confusing at first glance.
Negative: On the downside, certain concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition and documentation. @MisterB863 noted the potential repainting of the front bumper and queried the condition of hidden areas under the vehicle. Additionally, @DBRK asked if the car had undergone any tuning or modifications and expressed a desire for documentation of the engine rebuild, hinting that the lack of formal records might be a drawback for some potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Davidch1974 (The Seller) provided details indicating that the vehicle is in good condition. The air conditioning works well in all areas, and the V10 engine is described as quiet and strong. @Davidch1974 (The Seller) also mentioned that the interior of the truck is excellent and solid, asserting its overall reliability and quality.
Neutral: @phatfill asked if any work or upgrades had been completed during the year that @Davidch1974 (The Seller) has owned the vehicle, indicating curiosity about its care and maintenance. There were inquiries about specifics such as the operability of the back windshield wiper, the AC systems, and the transmission service history, showing potential buyers are keen on understanding the vehicle's full history and current state.
Negative: @Chriszark questioned the quick turnaround time related to the auction, hinting at possible concerns regarding the vehicle's condition or the seller's urgency. Further, @gastone21 asked about the functionality of both AC systems, while @Cabaum requested a picture of the emissions sticker, indicating a desire for transparency that may suggest some skepticism about the vehicle's compliance and performance.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its aesthetic appeal and performance. @boaboyoz described the C1 as a "total peach" and a "lovely example," while @tomjack referred to it as a "beautiful shade of Powder-Blue." @JAH525 shared a nostalgic memory of owning a similar model, expressing that the car design is one of the most beautiful ever produced by GM, emphasizing that whoever buys it is getting a beautiful car to drive and enjoy. Additionally, @58Charcoal remarked on the car's gorgeous look from every angle, showing excitement for the history the car carries with previous owners like @djbub, who highlighted its reliability and performance during his ownership.
Neutral: Comments reflected a mixture of straightforward inquiries and factual responses about the vehicle. @Dirtrack49 asked pertinent questions about the car's modifications and requested more information about the tires and transmission. In response, @Everson198 (The Seller) provided information about the car's maintenance history and confirmed that the tires were installed in 2009, suggesting replacements despite their low mileage due to age. Overall, the conversation maintained a neutral tone, focused on clarifying details regarding the vehicle’s condition and features.
Negative: Some comments brought attention to potential concerns. @Dirtrack49 asked if there were any dings or scratches, prompting @Everson198 (The Seller) to acknowledge minor chips and a scratch that had been touched up. @JoeBudoe inquired about the age of the tires due to their installation in 2009, which led @Everson198 to suggest that while the tires had low mileage, replacements were still advisable. @Rockwall205 expressed an interest in inspecting the vehicle in person, highlighting a barrier for potential buyers who could not make the trip. Overall, these negative sentiments revolved around the vehicle's wear and tear and the limitations of remote buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous positive comments highlighting its beauty and condition. @KiwiCuda remarked it is a great car, and @Blackjack21 praised its aesthetic by recommending new tires. @rlikis mentioned the car is likely one of the best SLKs available, while @indygolfnut found it beautiful. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) described the SLK350 as 'damn near flawless' and immaculate from top to bottom, emphasizing its well-kept nature and impressive options. There's a consensus on the car's reliability and powerful performance, with the seller reinforcing the impeccable state of the undercarriage and engine bay.
Neutral: Some inquiries were made regarding specific features and conditions of the vehicle. @Merced asked for clarification on the Keyless Go feature, which @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) confirmed works as intended. Questions about the age of tires were posed by @73carnut, and the seller noted they are original but in good condition. @MTGGTC asked about the exterior color tone, and @rlikis clarified the interior color, helping to address potential concerns from bidders. Several comments, such as those from @Tommie57 regarding rust and @indygolfnut about the driver's seat condition, were responded to with reassurance about the vehicle's preserved state and offered more insights into its care over the years.
Negative: A few concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition and details. @Merced pointed out a discrepancy regarding the keyless entry feature shown in photos, which prompted an explanation from @Collectibleclassics (The Seller). @indygolfnut noted an odd noise in a video, which was attributed to road conditions rather than a mechanical issue, but still raised questions about the car's performance. Additionally, @Tommie57 expressed concern that the vehicle might have rust due to its geographical history, though this was dismissed by @rlikis and @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) as being garaged and rarely driven in poor conditions. Overall, while these comments were few, they reflect an effort from bidders to ensure they have a complete understanding before proceeding with a purchase.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @SpecWerksLTD expressed excitement about the well-preserved Super Beetle, highlighting its rare condition and drive performance. @PWSchuh and @mick59 both commented on the impressive state of the vehicle, with @PWSchuh noting a preference for it over modern cars if A/C were not a necessity. @Jfp58 recalled personal experiences with similar models, describing them as dependable and enjoyable to drive, while @TJC45 appreciated the car's aesthetics, finding beauty in its design after previously overlooking the Super Beetle model.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the technical aspects and features of the vehicle. @Kayemtee raised questions regarding the necessity of a new windshield for state inspection and noted concerns about the window trim. @kverma noted the original factory windshield trim's condition and suggested alternatives for restoration. Additionally, @SpecWerksLTD provided detailed replies to inquiries regarding the vehicle's maintenance and condition, clarifying points about the windshield crack and surface corrosion.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @Kayemtee pointed out the need for a new front windshield to pass inspection, while @agm008 inquired about the length of a windshield crack that could risk failing inspection. There were also mixed sentiments about the deterioration of some trim elements, hinting at possible issues that could concern prospective buyers. Overall, while many comments reflected admiration for the vehicle, there were evident apprehensions regarding certain aspects of its condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments highlight the impressive aesthetics and quality of the vehicle. @boaboyoz describes it as a "beautiful black C10" and praises the build quality, while @nwfindz mentions that the truck is very clean and a nice driver despite not being a fan of stepsides. @ChristineMadeCarrotCake notes the truck's flawless appearance and suggests it would make a great family legacy or investment. @Wildboarkiller also admires the cleanliness of the truck, stating it's the best in the Rogue Valley area and mentions its attractive sound while driving.
Neutral: A few comments provide neutral observations about the vehicle's features and characteristics. @De3de8 comments on the unique hood snorkels, comparing them to Mopar designs. @Richard2222 expresses curiosity about the truck's transmission without offering a judgment on its quality. @Rmosborne67 finds the truck beautiful and is watching closely for potential bidding, implying interest but not necessarily an opinion on its worth.
Negative: There are no overt negative comments about the vehicle. However, @Jaydawg7 reflects on a past regret of not purchasing a similar truck for a lower price, suggesting a missed opportunity that could hint at the competition or market demand for such trucks, but does not reflect any criticism of the current vehicle itself.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has been described as one of the cleanest 2008 BMW M3 Coupes available, with an immaculate exterior and incredibly clean interior. @rmwcali (The Seller) notes that the car has been well-maintained, garage-kept, and features a stunning Jet Black exterior complemented by a Fox Red leather interior. This unique color combination, complemented by a manual 6-speed transmission and a strong V8 engine, adds to the appeal of the vehicle. Previous ownership seems to have cared for the car meticulously, leading to additional claims of it running without any issues and being well-documented with service history.
Neutral: Comments from various users express curiosity regarding the vehicle's smog compliance and its title status, with @Ewok13 asking if the vehicle will be smogged before sale and @heel_toe inquiring about the nature of its Utah title. @Argin25 also expresses interest in the reason for the sale, indicating potential concerns about the car's history. @SkippyR shares personal experience with the same color, further emphasizing the beauty of the paint, while @Joswar01 expresses confidence in the vehicle's future appreciation in value, highlighting its fun driving experience.
Negative: There are some concerns raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding its original throttle actuators and rod bearings, with comments from @Ewok13 and @Carnut4ever pointing out these are common issues with this generation of the M3. @asaosborne laments the drilling of a front plate into the bumper, which could indicate a potential issue for some buyers. @Tunasandwich humorously suggests that the front plate situation is a 'ticking time bomb', showing that there are still worries about the vehicle's condition despite the seller's assurances.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle's overall condition, particularly noting the low mileage of 13k and its status as a one-owner, garage-kept car. @keithd13 mentioned that the minor accident would not significantly affect the vehicle's sale price, while @huskymale pointed out that despite minor cosmetic issues like curb rash and a scrape on the rear bumper, the car is "amazing" and the winning bidder would be very pleased. @sosr32 complimented the car's appearance, and the seller, @youngtimerclassics, has reassured potential buyers by stating that the car has never had paintwork and has perfect paint meter readings, further instilling confidence in the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: There have been requests for additional information regarding the vehicle's accident history and features such as the heated steering wheel and adaptive cruise control. @fwallen and @Surf both highlighted the need for details about the accident to inform potential bidding. The seller has clarified that the accident was a minor parking lot incident resulting in minimal damage, and confirmed specifications of the car like the presence of a power rear liftgate and the absence of adaptive cruise control. Comments from @Georgeamoth and @Dhammond1955 also focused on technical features like steering adjustments and key fobs, indicating a mix of interest in the car's functionality.
Negative: In contrast to the positive commentary, some concerns have been raised about the discrepancy in the seller's accident description. @socal59 questioned the seller's claim that only the rear bumper was affected, hinting at previous mentions of a more significant accident. Additionally, @SMjaded expressed strong personal dislike for the wagon’s design, though acknowledged its clean condition. The comments indicate some skepticism about the seller's transparency regarding the vehicle's history, demonstrating a need for potential buyers to fully assess the details provided.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as a "gorgeous rare beauty" and appreciates the power bid, indicating that it is very deserving of attention. @Knuckles-R-Busted expresses excitement about learning about such rare vehicles, mentioning that Bring a Trailer is a great place to find uncommon and special cars. @boaboyoz finds the Camaro to be "cool" and a "tremendous beast", wishing good luck to the auction winner.
Neutral: @KGRoberts raises a question about the black top on the car, prompting @ssterry to clarify that the car originally had a white soft top. @BidRunner (The Seller) acknowledges this, confirming that the black top was added by a previous owner. Various commenters discuss the production and rarity of the vehicle, with @nyy1996ws asking about its history at the track and documentation, while @tbenvie provides detailed information about the classification of festival cars.
Negative: Commenters like @indycamaro and @tbenvie bring up concerns over the authenticity of the car as a pace car, stating that it was not used in the race and challenging some claims made by the seller. @nyy1996ws also shares skepticism regarding the seller's assertions, suggesting that the car is a dealer-ordered pace car replica rather than one used at the Indianapolis 500. Additionally, @SteveH61 points out that the decoding of the build date is incorrect, adding a cautionary note about the vehicle's history.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MartyBell praised the car, calling it a beautiful C2 and emphasizing that restomods are currently leading the market for this model. @FullBlownChaosFL complimented the thoroughness of the restomod, stating it has everything necessary for a perfect driving experience and is likely to win at shows. Likewise, @RFord75578 expressed love for everything about the vehicle, noting its automatic transmission as a major plus for older enthusiasts, further reiterating the model's appeal. @allmeads, despite usually not favoring restomods, expressed that the C2's tasteful modifications caught their attention and deemed it worthy of a high price tag, praising @IXIEWTECH's effort in building this vehicle.
Neutral: @IXIEWTECH (The Seller) responded to various inquiries regarding the 1963 RestoMod, mentioning that he welcomes questions and has made several enhancements since the last listing. He described the addition of a soft top, renovated frame, and a polished paint job, while being open about his extensive background in car restoration, emphasizing it’s a hobby rather than a business for him. The seller also acknowledged the supportive comments from other users and received a question regarding the potential for the car to be judged, which he had not considered until posed by @BigTanks.
Negative: There were some inquiries from users like @Triker and @HTHB that indicated uncertainty about specific details of the car. @Triker asked whether the motor was built or factory-spec and requested a build sheet, while @HTHB inquired about the possibility of personal inspection, highlighting a lack of knowledge about the car's condition and modifications. These concerns suggest a need for more detailed information from the seller about the specifics of the engine and transmission components.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's beauty and restoration quality. @dollycat3 referred to it as an 'opalescent gray beauty' that looks better than ever, while @HPLM described it as 'gorgeous' in both color and presentation. @ronavery shared nostalgic feelings, recalling his father's similar vehicle and noted the impressive body panel alignment and chrome. Other users like @pudknocker9108 and @tapped praised the meticulous attention to detail in the restoration, emphasizing that it should fetch a significant price due to its quality.
Neutral: Several users inquired about specific features of the car, with @octobermoon asking for photos of the spare wheel and details regarding the electric power steering. @75shortfinal and @streynal sought information about the exhaust system and side mirrors, respectively. Comments from @ecdtom (The Seller) provided clarification and promised to supply additional photos and information, indicating the expected responsiveness to potential buyers' queries and support for their decision-making process.
Negative: On the flip side, there were some criticisms regarding certain aspects of the car. @cruzahome humorously pointed out the mention of replacing a coolant hose clamp as an oddly specific detail in the sale description. @robertwichert expressed concern about the omitted tilting license plate assembly, highlighting its potential for damage due to a problematic design. Overall, while the vehicle garnered much praise, these critiques highlighted some areas for improvement that prospective buyers might consider.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Mushinryu praised the seller for being trustworthy, while @gdl203 and @kkay admired the car's awesome color, expressing love for the shade. @Brad_B noted the beauty of the Giulietta Spiders in Celeste Blue and shared a positive personal experience of driving his Spider along the coast. The seller, @nweuro, echoed this sentiment, stating that the car is a supreme value in the collector car world, highlighting its charm, driving pleasure, and overall appeal. Several users, including @Pinot64 and @Peter, spoke about the car's desirability for spirited driving, further enhancing its allure.
Neutral: Some comments revolved around the restoration process, such as @Tom_F2 inquiring about records or photos. @deversi and @Damigian asked about the paint code and condition of the car's top, seeking clarification on details that require further insights from the seller. @TDC40 raised questions concerning the extent of rust repair and body damage while acknowledging the car's strong appearance. The seller addressed these points by detailing the restoration history and the care taken by previous owners, reassuring potential buyers about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: However, some negativity surfaced as @badgot's comment was flagged as non-constructive, and @deversi expressed skepticism about the paint color being truly Celeste, mentioning the possibility of the restoration’s representation being inaccurate. @TDC40 lamented the lack of restoration photos, reflecting potential buyer concerns over transparency. Additionally, some commenters like @Awk166 noted that despite the car's high quality, the absence of restoration visuals raised questions about its past, complicating the buying decision for some.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @steamshovel described the vehicle as a beautiful Mini Convertible that checks all the boxes and noted it is very lightly used and well cared for. @Barryward expressed support with a thumbs-up and good luck posting. @maw06 provided a perspective on the car's maintenance, suggesting it would be a good time to purchase it and shared advice for ensuring the vehicle lasts for many summers after performing necessary oil changes.
Neutral: @JAGonza14 (The Seller) clarified some details regarding the vehicle's history, stating that the 'auto theft recovery' was due to the previous owner misplacing the car at an airport rather than an actual theft. @JAGonza14 also mentioned that the car has had regular oil changes and maintenance, with no major service required. However, he acknowledged that he does not have personal records and can check with the service provider for a list of services performed.
Negative: @duduifrah raised a concern regarding the discrepancy in the odometer reading on Carfax. @haljo inquired about a stain on the roof, suspecting that it may have been caused by a cleaning product that damaged the dye. @Lynwoodmp pointed out swirl marks on the front plastic cowling, asking if they could be buffed out, to which @JAGonza14 assured that he planned to have detailing work done.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @marcander76 notes that the vehicle looks super clean, and @Harrisdl shares their positive experience after purchasing a 2007 FJ from the seller, stating that it was better than described and in incredible condition. They appreciated the communication and assistance with shipping from the seller. @concoursguy compliments the vehicle's color, while @buttesilverbow expresses their love for the FJ, mentioning that despite some minor drawbacks, it's still one of their favorite vehicles and encourages prospective buyers that they wouldn't be disappointed.
Neutral: @KMB123 asks two questions about the vehicle, specifically regarding the smoke-free cabin and the Apple CarPlay functionality. @OldCarFan (The Seller) responds that there is no smell in the cabin and that Carplay seems to be wireless, although they have not tested it thoroughly. @1guzeman inquires about any leaks, particularly related to the timing cover, and receives assurance from the seller that there are no leaks. Additionally, @mercmike raises a question regarding the lack of Carfax history for such an old vehicle, noting that it may seem odd to have no vehicle registration documented.
Negative: @oldcarjunky raises concerns about the vehicle's Carfax report stating it was exported from Japan and imported to Newark, NJ, while contrasting it with the seller's description of the car's history. They question the seller's ownership origin and the vehicle's title history in the USA, asking about any import and customs taxes that may remain unpaid. This skepticism casts doubt on the vehicle's documentation and raises red flags for potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's overall presentation and condition. @Barryward mentioned that his girlfriend loves the Escalade, highlighting its appeal as a desirable vehicle. @PM_Terra (The Seller) provided reassurance about the car's history, emphasizing its excellent condition for its age and confirming it has been well maintained. Furthermore, the seller also offers detailed videos and photos to potential bidders, showcasing the vehicle thoroughly, which has been positively received by interested buyers.
Neutral: Comments such as those from @UncleBaldy and @tom1953 reflect some curiosity about the vehicle's maintenance history and ownership, but they aren't negative nor overly positive. @galenjg raised questions about potential odors in the car, which are significant to some buyers, while @PM_Terra (The Seller) promptly addressed these inquiries, indicating confidence in the car's condition. Additionally, @Carbuff3 requested more detailed video content to better assess the Escalade, indicating a desire for more information, a common request among buyers.
Negative: On the downside, there were concerns raised regarding the air conditioning not functioning, as indicated by @steve_heck, who noted it should have been disclosed. This comment sparked further skepticism from @NWSooner, questioning how a dealer could be unaware of such a problem. @steve_heck also mentioned that the front driver's seat was recovered in vinyl rather than leather, which might lead to disappointment for some buyers looking for authentic luxury features. The seller acknowledged these issues and committed to addressing them, but concerns about transparency lingered.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments highlight the car's rarity and desirability, particularly @NickW1 expressing admiration for the vehicle's iconic status and unique features. @DanielG appreciates the combination of color and trims, and even expresses a desire to have the car in their own garage, signifying its attractiveness. @NoCarorMopar notes the remarkable detailing in its modifications, emphasizing the thoughtful enhancements made to the car, which further elevates its appeal among enthusiasts.
Neutral: There are many technical discussions surrounding the car's original color, with several commenters, including @mlrodgers6, confirming the paint code as EW1, which refers to the vehicle being originally white. The dialogue about the fender tag details, initiated by @NoCarorMopar and followed up by the seller, shows a collaborative effort to clarify the car's history. @gb70 requests additional videos to showcase the vehicle's functionality and presence, highlighting a desire to see more of what the car has to offer.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism regarding the clarity of the car's history and authenticity. @NoCarorMopar raises concerns about the fender tag and the need for better images to confirm details to potential buyers. Additionally, @outlawten5 remarks on the car's original yellow color order, which could lead to confusion about its true identity, showcasing that the car's history is somewhat unclear. There are also questions about certain design choices, such as the absence of a floor shifter, noted by @Gs82, which might detract from its iconic status.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments from @EspritS1 highlight the excellent condition and functionality of the Range Rover L405. They express excitement about the auction and emphasize that the vehicle has lived in a dry Arizona climate, been dealer cared for, and consistently serviced. @jporter1966 praises the vehicle for its impressive performance and highway fuel efficiency, noting that driving it is an exceptional experience.
Neutral: @Molak1 inquires about any unusual odors potentially present in the vehicle's interior. @Mongoose55 asks about the distance to the vehicle pickup location, to which @EspritS1 responds that it is only about 20 minutes away. @EspritS1 continues to engage with potential buyers, dropping off videos showcasing the cold start, driving performance, and features of the Rover, as well as providing reassurance about the vehicle's interior odor.
Negative: There are no explicitly negative comments regarding the vehicle. However, @Molak1's question about interior odors suggests some concern about the vehicle's history, although @EspritS1 promptly addresses this by confirming that there are no smells present. Overall, the comments reflect a positive atmosphere around the auction, with only mild apprehensions expressed.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance and specifications, highlighting its beautiful stance and the appeal of the '95 Porsche 993 C4. @Bdpoppy20 noted that these cars look particularly good at the ride height they currently have, while @GammaChad clarified that the 1995 C4 model comes with the standard body, which adds to its desirability as it was less common. The seller, @MohrImports, has been engaged and transparent, offering assistance with shipping options and encouraging prospective buyers to reach out for pre-purchase inspections, showcasing their commitment to customer service.
Neutral: There were various inquiries and clarifications shared among commenters regarding the Porsche's features and performance. @SAAAS and @Pumpkin911 discussed the body type of the car, confirming that the 993 C4 has the standard narrow body and not the wider Turbo style. Additionally, concerns were raised by @Supergrass and @stucati about an apparent rattling noise noted in a driving video, reflecting some curiosity about the vehicle's condition and quality. The selling entity remained responsive to these questions, indicating a proactive approach in addressing buyer concerns.
Negative: Despite the positive sentiments, some comments pointed out potential red flags regarding pricing and vehicle condition. @jerryberry403 criticized the auction price, noting a recent sale for a similar model with fewer kilometers went for significantly less, indicating a concern about overpricing. @nielen expressed skepticism about a sudden price increase that seemed too steep, while @stucati highlighted a lack of detailed service history, suggesting buyers may want to consider a pre-purchase inspection due to the unclear maintenance records. Overall, these comments suggest a cautious approach when considering the vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ShawnZX (The Seller) describes the 1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 as a well-maintained vehicle with extensive upgrades, including a 351 Windsor engine, a Hurst Competition Plus shifter, and an electronic ignition system. Enthusiasts like @watergate528 and @funkaHolik admire the car's overall appearance and the thoughtful upgrades made, such as the 4-speed transmission and the use of period-correct parts like the hood-mounted tachometer. #@Tobyallen and @boss2man provide positive feedback on the car's restoration, color choice, and how it exemplifies the peak of automotive design from that era.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @gebirg and @Gopher428, note that they appreciate the car's aesthetic appeal and craftsmanship without delving deeply into specifics. They express thoughts about the design, the potential performance, and the era's characteristics associated with the Mustang. @Gopher428's inquiry regarding the proper positioning of the rear spoiler indicates a shared interest in the details of restoration, reflecting a collective curiosity among the commenters concerning the car's authenticity and historical features without strong opinions either way.
Negative: A few comments raise concerns, particularly regarding the rust issues mentioned by @Jimmy55 and @Jlenny, who inquire about the vehicle's structural integrity and window alignment. @tdbdds also notes the absence of a title as a potential hurdle for future buyers, suggesting that this feature might deter some from completing a purchase. @shelbymann70 expresses confusion over the color change and mentions cumbersome aftermarket louvers, indicating that not all aspects of the car are universally admired.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's impressive aesthetic and build quality. @RZimm noted that the 996 is beautifully presented and remarked that it sells itself. @mmilocco15 shared enthusiasm about their similar car indicating that it brings them endless joy, claiming it's pure driving bliss. @boaboyoz commended the Guards Red color, calling it gorgeous and perfectly represented by the seller. Additionally, @Caymanorcarrera recognized the vehicle’s resurgence in popularity, acknowledging that while the car was overlooked in the past, it has now found a dedicated following.
Neutral: Some commenters engaged in inquiries regarding specific features and details of the car. @paddict8 asked about the low mileage and requested information on tire production dates. @Wibby wanted clarity on cylinder wall photos but received prompt responses from @911r, who elaborated on scoring and pitting levels. The seller, @911r, committed to sharing more details such as paint measurements and cam deviation results, showing an active effort to keep potential buyers informed.
Negative: A few remarks expressed concerns about certain aspects of the vehicle. @grickthompson pointed out a perceived hole in the driver's seat, which @911r clarified was just an irregularity in the leather. Additionally, @randomuser00 suggested possible work needed based on cam deviation results, though @The_Other_Brad reassured them that it was within spec. Overall, while there were minor concerns, the overwhelming sentiment leaned towards admiration for the vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @johnnyvett praised the car for being one of the most comfortable and friendly driving Cobra replicas available, stating that it’s ideal for long trips without discomfort. @mastercarsinc echoed this sentiment, highlighting the ease of insurance, the fun of driving, and the car's impressive performance upgrades. Additionally, @Arcticman907 (The Seller) mentioned that he, being a larger driver, has no issues driving it on long journeys, demonstrating the car's practicality for diverse driver needs.
Neutral: Questions were raised by several commenters, including @c2kid regarding the chassis design and the specifics about shipping costs from Alaska, which @Arcticman907 confirmed to be around $4200. @RDM7533 also inquired about the 5-speed Borg Warner transmission, which the seller affirmed, establishing clarity about the vehicle's specifications. There was also curiosity about the car's maintenance and insurance, with @Arcticman907 providing reassuring responses about the ease of both.
Negative: Concerns were expressed by some users about the design details, specifically the shifter positioning brought up by @FargoCarGuy, who noted it wasn't in the typical location for a Cobra replica. @RDM7533 pointed out worry about the integrity of the front suspension setup and potential leaks, which @Arcticman907 addressed by stating that the car is very clean and showcases no leaks, but it nonetheless reflects some apprehensions regarding parts sourcing and maintenance for this model.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ahmedabdul14 praises the vehicle for its beautiful specifications and perfect design for enthusiasts, noting its nice color and affordability. @MHHamrhead, a seasoned owner of various CTS and ATS-V models, appreciates the existence of a 4-door Cadillac with a manual transmission, considering it a fun aspect which contrasts to the Corvette. Enthusiasts like @addictedtojunk applaud this sedan as one of the best super sedans available, celebrating the addition of manual transmission options that are becoming rare in new sports cars.
Neutral: Multiple commenters, like @newcarpro and @tcfurlong (The Seller), provide detailed specifications and features of the car, indicating its high-performance engineering and technology packages. @maw06 reflects on the nostalgic connection to Cadillacs, suggesting that the sound of the vehicle is reminiscent of race cars, which could appeal to older fans of the brand. Commenters also discuss the vehicle's CPO warranty, its service history, and daily usability, adding useful information for potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns arise from comments such as @badcad who humorously emphasizes the fading availability of manual transmissions across brands. @Tae raises questions about the vehicle’s ownership history, prompting a discussion on the potential implications it might have on its value or reliability. @Bobprantner expresses frustration over unanswered questions regarding potential smoking history, while @bxd76 inquires about the condition of critical components, indicating hesitancy to fully trust the vehicle's advertised condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Hogbud expressed a positive sentiment by stating, "I like it," which indicates a favorable impression of the vehicle. This simple affirmation suggests that the vehicle has qualities that appeal to the observer, despite the lack of detailed feedback.
Neutral: Several comments seek additional information or clarification about the vehicle's condition and features. @FBFM inquired about the lien and the bank, while @King95 asked about the history of prior accident damage and the status of the certified pre-owned warranty. @AbsoluteGarage also posed several questions related to a pre-purchase inspection, tire tread gauge, brake pad condition, and warranty status, indicating a practical interest in understanding the vehicle's condition before making a decision. @solmacera1 asked if the car was equipped with CarPlay, further showing a consideration for modern features.
Negative: @rmurphy1990 raised a concern regarding the tire pressure label, questioning, "What happened to the tire pressure label?" This comment hints at a potential issue with the vehicle that may need attention. Additionally, @Anakache, the seller, clarified that the label was already in this condition when they purchased the car certified pre-owned from Porsche Broward, suggesting that this might not be an isolated problem but rather something to monitor.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @agrowe (The Seller) shares a heartfelt story about this vehicle, highlighting its classic SL500 style and beautiful red color, which drew him in when his wife pointed it out. The car served as a perfect companion for summer drives over the Grand Mesa, giving them memorable experiences with the top down. Its limited use has kept the mileage low, which adds to its appeal, and the care it has received is evident in its condition.
Neutral: The seller notes that they had considered holding onto the car, but due to a need for a new daily driver for his wife and a desire to avoid car payments, they have decided to sell it. While they still have affection for the car, practical circumstances are driving their decision to find a new owner. They express a willingness to provide additional information about the vehicle to interested buyers.
Negative: Despite the seller's strong positive feelings about the car, there are challenges in the decision to sell, mainly stemming from financial considerations. The inability to retain such a beloved classic due to car payments adds a touch of regret to the situation. The seller expresses that losing the vehicle is unfortunate, as it has been a source of joy and nostalgia for them.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments express a strong appreciation for the vehicle's condition and maintenance, with @GregAdamsIL highlighting it as an impressive example that has clearly been well cared for. @roger.noble agrees, noting it is nicely preserved and well-maintained, while @jloker refers to it as a super nice example and hopes it does well for the seller. Additional positive remarks come from @willharris75, who calls it super clean, and @schuin, who describes it as a great road car that drives like a Porsche. The seller, @tff, emphasizes the car's successful history in shows, mentioning awards won such as 1st place at the 2022 Werks Reunion Amelia Island and a Euro Award at the 2017 Euro Auto Festival, reinforcing the vehicle's quality and appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @tff, provides thorough details about the car's history and condition, noting that while the rear quarter panels have been repainted, the rest of the vehicle was believed to be original paint until measured with a paint thickness gauge. They clarify that the car shows very well overall and are transparent about past paintwork to avoid surprises for potential buyers. A detailed list of various maintenance and upgrades completed over the last decade, such as replacing shocks and updating the stereo system, was shared, showcasing the seller's dedication in caring for the vehicle. The seller indicates availability for test drives and viewings, inviting potential buyers to engage more with the car.
Negative: Some comments express concern about the vehicle's odometer repair, with @remac1 inquiring about the impact of a recent fix the seller made due to a common issue with plastic gears failing in older Porsches. @jsloan7 asks whether there are any mechanical issues needing attention, prompting @tff to assure that the car is extremely well-sorted and that he is unaware of any problems. While the seller assures that they have not noticed any oil consumption during their ownership, this topic drew further curiosity from other commenters, indicating ongoing interest in understanding the car's reliability from previous owners.
|
One-Family-Owned, 427-Powered 1972 Chevrolet Chevelle YF3 Heavy Chevy 4-Speed
1C37H2K651168
Lot 200099
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Al_Loco describes the vehicle as a 'Cool Heavy Chevy' with attractive parts and notes its factory U14 gauge quality. @Barryward expresses that he would be in heaven with the 427 engine and the 4-speed transmission, highlighting excitement over the car's features. @Intimidator04 appreciates the car's vintage charm, especially the glass pack exhaust and decals, branding it a 'cool old school car.' @JayKay2430 adds that the car seems to have potential authenticity as a YF3 model, making it a desirable street machine. @ssterry complements the Chevelle’s condition and suggests the inclusion of its RPO history. @JayKay2430 celebrates the discovery of a build sheet, considering it a valuable piece of the car's history.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in a discussion about the Heavy Chevy option package, with @Jaydawg7 questioning its origins and @keith_k confirming its existence based on his memories of an orange model. There’s also a general consensus regarding the historical interest in this car, with @ssterry discussing the importance of verifying its authenticity given the prevalence of cloned vehicles. @poojoe_jetaime (The Seller) mentions the car's family history, sharing details about its original purchase and maintenance, though acknowledging a lack of documentation due to its owner's hands-on approach. Furthermore, @poojoe_jetaime notes the compression ratio and fuel specifications after inquiries by @Matysik.
Negative: While there are many positive comments, a few concerns about authenticity arise. @ssterry points out the presence of incorrect door trim panels and questions the overall original condition of the interior, indicating potential modifications that may affect the car's value. @JayKay2430 notes that while the car displays some correct features for a YF3, the missing build sheet or documentation could lead to uncertainties about its provenance. Overall, while enthusiasm for the vehicle is high, there are underlying concerns about establishing its original specifications and the authenticity of presented features.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Daspyda commented on the vehicle, describing it as a very nice unit with up-to-date service records, although they suggested adding wheel bearings for improvements. @EvenFlow78 appreciated the car's aesthetics, identifying it as beautiful, while also inquiring about imperfections and the original items included with the vehicle. @dailydino affirmed the Z32's potential for fun, sharing their positive experiences with their own car and expressing that this model attracts significant attention due to its classic design and performance capabilities.
Neutral: Comments from @motorcarmarketusa, the seller, clarified some concerns raised by other commenters. They mentioned that a pressure wash had caused some coolant residue visible in the engine bay that raised questions from @AV8DARRELL, but assured that the car was dry. In response to @0-60eventually's inquiry about the vehicle's mileage, the seller explained it was rarely driven compared to the owner's collection of 22 cars. The seller also addressed @MR2Adam's request regarding a compression test, stating none had been performed due to the car's optimal running condition. They also confirmed to @Lexoma that the timing belt and water pump have been replaced.
Negative: Concerns were raised by several commenters regarding the vehicle's history. @0-60eventually questioned the low mileage added over seven years, while @Jrsneed1 alarmingly stated the vehicle was stolen, though there was no confirmation on this. @Rayzz26 discussed market trends, suggesting that the car was likely bought as an investment rather than for enjoyment, which might negatively impact its value in the current market. Additionally, @dbdaniel424 pointed out discrepancies in the description of exhaust modifications, which could imply a lack of attention to detail in the listing.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its unique appeal and rarity. @1Cobra1 commented on the memorable name of the car, while @Gmmuscleusa and @Hadamullett praised the seller's detailed responses about the restoration work. The vehicle's significance was noted, with @razecar4 appreciating the seller's logical explanations regarding the project nature of the car, suggesting that the significant work done to it would be calming for potential buyers.
Neutral: The comments reflected a mix of opinions about the vehicle's current state and project status. @CincyClassic (The Seller) provided substantial insights, stating that although some upgrades were still needed, over $40K had been invested in restoration and many components were newly replaced or in excellent condition. Commenters like @CarFoolLane recognized the historical significance of the exhaust system while pointing out that many of the incomplete elements might be more about personal preference for the next owner.
Negative: Some criticisms arose regarding the vehicle's incomplete aspects. @Dr.Vette and @rocksteady pointed out the unfinished elements of the car, questioning why certain repairs were not completed despite significant restoration efforts. @Habu2 raised concerns about the oil pressure sender's placement, suggesting that it may affect performance and stability. Overall, there was a sense of skepticism about the adequacy of the restoration, particularly from those wanting a fully completed vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @cgconner finds the vehicle to be a fun little track car project and appreciates that someone is enjoying their Alfa. @sshbsn considers it one of the coolest track cars they have come across on BaT. @Sal996R mentions the condition of a related bike, further emphasizing the quality aspect of the vehicle, congratulating @infotron on its clean state. Overall, there's a vibe of excitement and positivity surrounding the car's potential as a unique project.
Neutral: @infotron (The Seller) provides several factual comments clarifying the car's features and condition, such as noting the installation of a 4 point harness with a mention of the mount for a 5 point harness, as well as sharing that driving video footage will be available soon. Additionally, @infotron addresses several questions regarding rust issues and modifications made since the car's ownership, stating that service records include receipts for work done and that no major mechanical issues are present.
Negative: Some users express concerns about the vehicle's condition, such as @Ratedarrgh who questions the presence of rust and the lack of adequate images to assess the car’s structural integrity. @JackWilsonJr raises a variety of inquiries about the car's modifications, history, and operation, highlighting uncertainties about the speedometer, engine conditions, and convertible top compatibility. Additionally, @TBcarnut51 points out a discrepancy regarding the speedometer's accuracy and requests track records, reflecting a sense of skepticism about the car's racing history.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @bulldogspcl mentioned how special this woodie is, stating that it underwent a 1990s restoration and is a highly original rust-free vehicle. Many commenters like @Tankhemi and @LeighLh praised its condition and beauty, noting the wood and upholstery are in great shape. @Chopperken highlighted the car's modifications that enhance its performance and make it an enjoyable driver, emphasizing Alex Finigan's expertise in its development. @Rossodino shared fond memories of owning similar vehicles and expressed how this woodie would bring joy to its new owner.
Neutral: @bulldogspcl clarified details about the car, like the upholstery materials and a full lube service done recently. Several commenters asked practical questions about the car's usability for daily driving and the possibility of transporting groups. @Maroonedd inquired about the reliability for longer drives while @SHART47 asked about storage options if they become the owner. The seller assured that the vehicle runs smoothly at regular temperatures even in hot conditions.
Negative: Some comments reflected concern over the vehicle's age and its maintenance requirements. @Maroonedd expressed hesitation about needing a flat-bed wrecker for potential issues. @joeyesmen compared it to their own car, implying the stock versions might not be as capable, which suggests worries about the stock performance. Additionally, some commenters hinted at a competitive attitude in the market, with @Rockwhite lamenting space constraints for a larger garage, which reflects an underlying tension between desirability and practicality.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @eatsnax (The Seller) expresses a genuine love for the 1993.5 Supra Premier Edition and hopes to find someone who will also appreciate it. Multiple commenters like @Beans_Bacon recognize the appeal of the Supra, emphasizing that they not only like the car but truly love it. @eatsnax also highlights that the vehicle comes with an extra ECU computer, which adds value and reassurance for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around inquiries and clarifications regarding the vehicle's history and condition. @CruzerCoug asks about the discrepancy in mileage and the car's accident history, while @Needmoreboost provides insight, suggesting that the mileage discrepancy is likely a clerical error from the DMV. @eatsnax responds to these questions in detail, explaining the accident and confirming that all VIN tags are intact, as well as addressing the mileage issue, making it clear that it will be documented appropriately for the next owner.
Negative: Concerns arise from some buyers, particularly around the mileage discrepancy and past accident, as highlighted by @CruzerCoug. While @eatsnax provides explanations, there is lingering skepticism about how these issues might affect the car's future registration and value. Furthermore, comments about potential misunderstandings regarding the VIN tag indicate that some prospective buyers are wary of the vehicle's condition and paper trail.
|
30-Years-Family-Owned 1994 Land Rover Range Rover County LWB
SALHC1346RA641667
Lot 200108
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @SalmoTrutta shared a heartfelt story about his 1994 Range Rover LWB, reminiscing about the adventures he had with his wife and the reliability of the vehicle over their many trips across California and Colorado. He fondly recalls how they both learned to enjoy off-road driving, and he expressed nostalgia for the model, showing a strong emotional connection to the vehicle. @TommyVal and @eroth appreciated his comments, praising his storytelling and the affection he has for his relationship and experiences with the Range Rover.
Neutral: @wgm, the seller, described the 1994 Range Rover LWB as a trusted family vehicle for three decades, highlighting its enduring design and the nostalgia it invokes. The seller acknowledged that while the car is slightly worn, it still holds a dignified presence that many admire. The seller also encouraged potential buyers to imagine themselves taking memorable road trips with the vehicle, hinting at its capability and timeless appeal.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's maintenance, particularly regarding the air conditioning system. @Motologic inquired about what was needed to get the factory air conditioning functioning again. @wgm later responded that a new compressor accepting R134a is necessary and estimated repair costs to be around $1000 after consulting with a mechanic. This suggestion of additional costs and potential mechanical issues may deter some buyers from considering the vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments regarding the vehicle highlight its appealing attributes and its suitability for collectors. @MaguireMotorcars emphasizes the bike's exceptional condition with just under 15,000 miles and features like a dual Cobra exhaust system and recent servicing, which included new tires and battery. @mediumformatphoto expresses enthusiasm about the sound of the mufflers, indicating satisfaction with the motorcycle's performance and auditory appeal. Moreover, the seller encourages potential buyers to reach out with questions, suggesting a supportive and engaging selling environment.
Neutral: @thicksey seeks clarification on the Street Magic LED system, indicating an interest in the details about the motorcycle's lighting. @MaguireMotorcars responds by explaining that the LED bulbs were previously installed but are currently non-functional due to the removal of the control module by the previous owner to prevent electrical issues. This exchange reflects an open line of communication and a willingness to provide more information to prospective buyers.
Negative: There are slight concerns raised regarding the functionality of the motorcycle's additional lighting features. @Mxr13 directly questions the operational status of the headlights and blinkers, indicating some uncertainty about the bike's overall electrical system despite @MaguireMotorcars confirming that these components are functional. The reference to the inoperative LED system may raise potential buyer apprehensions about the motorcycle's wiring and modifications.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dollycat3 praised the vehicle, describing it as beautiful and rare with a gorgeous color combination. They appreciated the wonderful styling and art-deco dash, indicating a strong admiration for the car's aesthetic qualities. Other commentators, such as @caozman, echoed this sentiment by highlighting the impressive chrome details, further emphasizing the vehicle's captivating design.
Neutral: @1996MBZ shared a personal favorite memory regarding a similar vintage model of the Chrysler New Yorker convertible, linking their appreciation for this specific car to nostalgic moments in the past. Meanwhile, @RFortuna raised practical inquiries about the vehicle's condition, asking about its functioning components like the ignition switch and whether the car drives well—demonstrating a balanced perspective that mixes admiration with concern for the car's usability.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @brakeservo about the decision to use a metric speedometer, questioning its practicality in a classic vehicle and suggesting a potential issue for enthusiasts. Additionally, @Cady59 (The Seller) revealed uncertainty about certain aspects of the car, such as missing components and the need for a replacement electrical harness, which may deter potential buyers worried about the vehicle's overall reliability.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments highlight the quality and craftsmanship of the vehicle, with @loggdon noting it as a "very nice Delivery" and recognizing the excellent build quality. @RichardWhitham (The Seller) emphasizes the attention to detail and reassures potential buyers that it is a "top notch, high quality built" car. The car's aesthetic is also praised, with @19Fordy enjoying its fuel tank placement, while @RichardWhitham (The Seller) mentions its appeal as a head-turner at local shows, suggesting it has garnered admiration from onlookers and even awards.
Neutral: Several comments involve inquiries about the vehicle's current status and history. @waypierce64 and @Pooh1716 ask about any remaining lien, with @RichardWhitham (The Seller) stating that the car has a reserve price and the bidding will continue until it is reached. @Bartrix poses a question regarding the vehicle's reliability over long drives, to which @RichardWhitham (The Seller) responds positively, asserting the car has not presented any recurring issues after multiple lengthy drives.
Negative: Some comments touch on minor issues with the vehicle, with @Piros1 seeking clarification on the loose door seal and steering column. @RichardWhitham (The Seller) addresses these concerns directly, acknowledging the minor fixes needed and asserting that these issues were disclosed openly to potential bidders. However, the scope of these issues is downplayed, as @RichardWhitham (The Seller) insists that overall the vehicle is an incredible purchase opportunity despite these small concerns.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commentors expressed positive sentiments about the opportunity to purchase a unique vehicle at a good price due to its branded title. @lunchbocks2002 mentioned that the vehicle's salvage history could spark interest as buyers often look for such opportunities. @Dogcar7377 (The Seller) confirmed that the car has been legally registered and driven for 11 years, assuring potential buyers of its roadworthiness and compliance with state regulations, particularly highlighting Maryland's strict safety inspection process as a positive assurance for the condition of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commentors raised questions about the vehicle's title status and insurance issues, reflecting a neutral stance. @FreddyQ pointed out the difference between 'salvage' and 'rebuilt' titles, seeking clarity on insurance eligibility. @CadillacFlashback and others discussed how different states handle title branding, indicating that potential buyers should research their local regulations to understand the implications of the vehicle's salvage title.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism about the vehicle's history and repairs due to its salvage title. @Carvinman and others questioned the seller about documentation and maintenance records, indicating concern over the vehicle's condition after being rebuilt. Additionally, @kwg123 mentioned the challenges related to obtaining a rebuilt title and the difficulty in getting full insurance coverage, hinting at potential roadblocks for future owners.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @39mercman praised the Chrysler for its appealing wood features, particularly enjoying the wood running across the headliner. @Dollycat3 expressed excitement about its return and wished for a better outcome this time. @HeavyTank77 noted that the vehicle would complement his own, indicating that even the @Minister_of_Finance agrees it is cool. @RidleysRides simply referred to it as a 'beauty,' contributing to the overall positive sentiment toward the car.
Neutral: @garagekeptmotors, the seller, responded to @Shumdit regarding the alumni tag, explaining why it was missing and noting it wasn't sold the first time. They mentioned their appreciation for the opening bids. @Shumdit also brought up another auction example related to the tag and commented on the vehicle's attractiveness.
Negative: @mcorrallo expressed concern that someone might steal the car based on past results for similar models. @brakeservo recalled a time when good old wooden T&C cars would trade near six figures, suggesting a decline in value. @emmy604 brought attention to potential issues with the wood panels, indicating that improper re-coating could lead to significant problems, and emphasized the importance of checking the veneer thickness.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has garnered attention for its solid build and appealing features, as seen in comments from @1Bad69GOAT and @02fanatic, who both express admiration for its aesthetics and classic Pontiac legacy. @Gitrdone (The Seller) emphasizes that the car is a good solid driver with some minor issues, providing an open invitation for inquiries and additional pictures. Commenters like @jpf1301 highlight that they appreciate the community atmosphere, where experienced enthusiasts share insights on the car's characteristics, enhancing the overall discussion about this GTO.
Neutral: Several comments address specific details and questions related to the vehicle's condition and specifications. @imbadboy inquires about the functionality of the air conditioning, while @Eberman0924 raises questions about the car's PHS documentation and its classification as a GTO or Tempest. @Banksonit709 and @Nutzandboltz also bring up potential fitment issues and water stains, which the seller acknowledges and commits to investigating further, showing a willingness to engage with potential buyers about their concerns.
Negative: Despite the positive overall impression, there are concerns raised regarding the vehicle's condition. @moontower points out possible water damage, while @1Bad69GOAT questions the removal of the trim tag. @Gitrdone (The Seller) acknowledges these issues but clarifies that the apparent water damage is due to heat-related problems with the laminate and offers solutions for minor repairs. Additionally, commenters like @SLG455, @RJK57, and @Yagottabkiddin note various flaws, including a cracked fog light and backwards fan blades, leading to some critical observations of the car's overall presentation.
|
25k-Mile 1998 Chevrolet Corvette Coupe Mallett 435 6-Speed
1G1YY22G1W5113333
Lot 200116
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @mhoward54 (The Seller) clarified the car's registration status and corrected the misinformation about its previous location, stating it is currently in Cocoa, FL. @FHSmini77 appreciated the seller's prompt and clear communication regarding the car's history and location. @mhoward54 also confirmed the car’s ownership history, stating it is a two-owner vehicle which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: @swordfishtrombone raised a valid point about the lack of specifications for horsepower and torque in the vehicle's listing, describing it as insufficiently detailed. @MartyKC expressed curiosity regarding the power specifications related to the 435 package from Mallett, suggesting that this detail should be better highlighted in the advertisement. Several commenters requested clarification on the tire sizes and whether the wheels were indeed 18 inches as stated initially or 17 inches, which was later confirmed by the seller.
Negative: @clints71 noted a discrepancy regarding the wheel sizes mentioned in the description, provoking concerns about the accuracy of the ad. @Safetybob questioned the need for a clutch replacement at only 25,000 miles, suggesting potential issues with the car's performance or prior use as a track vehicle. @Buster020065 expressed frustration about non-functioning videos related to the vehicle, indicating a lack of attention to detail in the ad presentation.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has garnered excitement and interest due to its unique history and design. @30gtv6 praised the intriguing narrative behind its John Paul Sr. connection, while @ZAPPPPP expressed nostalgia for the era of Porsche racing it represents. Commenters like @Stark0116 appreciated the car's intriguing nature as a derivative of the 935 models, and @Twickes found it surprising to see a full interior in such builds. @Twickes and others expressed the belief that while the car may need enhancements like a turbo and suspension upgrades, it still holds significant appeal and potential for thrill-seekers.
Neutral: Several comments have sought clarification regarding the vehicle's functionality and legal status. @adventuress365247 inquired about its street legality, and @Cski expressed curiosity about this as well, only to realize that the car is indeed street legal. @Stark0116 had questions concerning the air conditioning system and ride height, which the seller clarified by noting the existing parts and the exaggerated appearance of the ride height in photos.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle needing improvements to perform optimally. @DaveTea mentioned that it needs a turbo to back its impressive looks, while @IrishWhiskey pointed out that various components likely require a refresh due to the car's age. Commenters like @SlowNRusty joked about its horsepower, stating it has "the fastest looking 172hp" and that it could use more power. The general consensus is that while the car is visually striking, it needs several mechanical enhancements to match its aesthetic appeal.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed nostalgia and fond memories associated with the vehicle, indicating that it represents an era of enjoyable cruising cars. @topduarte shared that his first car was a red RS 5.0, and @Bongiovi described the car's beautiful color and noted how it was the perfect high school car. @Antboss also appreciated the color and options, suggesting it remains a desirable model as an RS after the IROC-Z was discontinued.
Neutral: Concerns about the vehicle's title have been a recurring theme in the comments. @HemiBoy63 and @KWAChevyGuy raised questions about its 'clean title' status after a total loss incident, leading @DmanHanFin (The Seller) to clarify the circumstances surrounding the title's classification, the accident, and the subsequent repairs. The Seller insists the vehicle holds a clean title based on documentation and provides transparency about its history and valuation, stating the repairs were approximately 75% of the vehicle's worth at the time of the incident.
Negative: Some comments highlighted lingering doubts about the vehicle's condition and history. @posetong inquired about a potential rattling sound from the engine that could indicate mechanical issues. @buzzbox remarked on the implications of the vehicle's total loss history, suggesting potential insurance challenges it might face, while @tommyboy34 pointed out visible paint damage, raising concerns about the car's overall aesthetic. Additionally, @AutoEffects questioned the quality of parts used for repairs, further amplifying skepticism about the car's restoration process.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CDehne appreciates the addition of the jump seat, noting it should have been offered by Ford as an option for the Bronco. @jsloden shares his positive experience with the third seat installation, mentioning how easy it was to bolt in without modifications. @FW_BRONC gives kudos to the seller for finding a center jump seat that matches the rest of the upholstery and praises the updates made to the vehicle, including the two-tone color scheme.
Neutral: @solobrowning, the seller, responds to various commenters by explaining the upgrades and modifications made to the Bronco. He notes that the power steering pump works well and acknowledges the vehicle's need for further suspension work, sharing the family trips taken in it. He also commented on modifications made to deal with rust, indicating that he has taken steps to restore the vehicle's integrity under the new fenders.
Negative: @Molae65 points out that the vibrations and clunking sounds in the rear may stem from a slip yoke that needs lubrication, suggesting it’s an easy fix. @Ford512 corrects @FW_BRONC about the riveted wheels, indicating that they are aftermarket and not factory wheels, highlighting a potential concern about the authenticity of the vehicle’s components compared to original specifications.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express nostalgia and admiration for the car, describing it as a remarkable and fun vehicle to drive. @gsmith9215 recalls their positive experiences with the car brand and praises the people behind the sale, while @PDXBryan and @Valiantjim highlight the unique charm and character of the Saab 96, appreciating its restoration and unique color with yellow stripes that pays tribute to the Swedish flag. @G.O.Mann reminisces about past ownership and the car's reliable performance in snow, emphasizing its practicality and safety compared to similar vehicles like the VW Beetle.
Neutral: Several users inquire about details regarding the vehicle's history and condition. @DanChester asks for additional information about the engine work and previous ownership history, while @Llauten60 provides a critical observation about the chassis showing signs of repair but still appreciates its overall solid structure. @SonettII (The Seller) responds to some of these inquiries, confirming details related to the restoration process and the removable nature of the custom paintwork, aiming to clarify any doubts potential buyers might have.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the car's mileage accuracy and wiring issues with the turn signal indicators. @Crazy_Swede questions the functioning of the turn signals and mentions a potential wiring issue, while @DeusEquitare discusses discrepancies related to the odometer reading, suggesting that the actual mileage may be higher than advertised. Additionally, @dakrei criticizes the focus on mileage as nitpicking, stressing that the car's restoration speaks volumes about its value despite its history.
|
JDM 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI GSR Tommi Makinen Edition
CP9A0201597
Lot 200050
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Baggsz exclaimed about how beautiful the car is, highlighting its stunning aesthetics. @hobbsm3 provided high praise, calling it one of the best cars for balance of power and control, emphasizing the joy it brings to drivers. @Ben_Drinking_Coffee noted its excellent condition, particularly its rust-free undercarriage, which is rare for this model. Meanwhile, @EuroJDMAuto lauded the overall mint condition and the car's handling characteristics, agreeing that the Evo 6.5 is well-regarded among car enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Alaug88 (The Seller) introduced himself as the current owner, sharing his intention to sell the vehicle while expressing appreciation for the positive comments. He also addressed inquiries regarding the car's condition, assuring potential buyers that there are no known issues, and confirmed that the production numbers indicate a limited availability of this specific model. Discussions among various commenters revolved around the legalities of importing the car to the U.S. and the rarity of this model in left-hand drive.
Negative: @stevethekat inquired about any problems with the car, suggesting some uncertainty regarding its readiness for future use. @JBtsurf expressed curiosity about the seller's decision to part with such a valued car, indicating some skepticism about letting go of a classic like the TME. @mcwop23 noted the challenges and complexity associated with finding left-hand drive variants, alluding to potential difficulties buyers may face.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @BitontoAutos expresses a high level of trust in the longevity and durability of the 3rd generation 4Runners, highlighting that they can withstand significant wear without major issues. @RaderJ also reassures potential buyers by sharing that the vehicle has been incredibly reliable, as they have driven 80,000 miles without encountering any problems, which includes multiple long-distance road trips. The Seller’s commitment to regular maintenance has contributed to this reliability, showing a good track record of care for the vehicle.
Neutral: The discussion around the vehicle includes inquiries about the specifics of the supercharger installation. @Sarki provides clarity that the supercharger and additional injector were installed back in 2006 when the vehicle had around 39,199 miles, offering context for those evaluating the modification's history. Furthermore, comments about photos and videos of coolant and driving conditions reflect a general interest in ensuring all aspects of the vehicle's condition are transparent to interested buyers.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding potential issues with the transmission, particularly for models from 2001-2002 as mentioned by @Archer84, indicating that these models might have more problems compared to earlier generations. @Dtxoreo points out visible wear on the driver's seat, questioning whether it's indicative of greater wear and tear or just bad lighting. This could raise red flags for potential buyers about the overall condition of the interior, prompting a demand for more visual evidence of the vehicle's state.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's overall aesthetic and specifications. @brinsd remarked on the beautiful spec, while @WallyBR noted the appealing color combination, stating it was gorgeous. @RideThePigGir echoed this sentiment, calling the car stunning, and others like @SLCGoonski and @SlowNRusty commented on the lovely spec, with @CKKurtz highlighting it as the perfect car for long road trips. Several remarks showed appreciation for the enhancements like the silver wheels @shamansky praised the original owner for. Commenters like @andytrio, who have experience with similar models, expressed interest in upgrading, further supporting the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: There were several inquiries about specific features of the car, showing that potential buyers are seeking more information. @sbmaine and @SlowNRusty raised questions regarding the color of the interior and the existence of a heated steering wheel, with @Crushap (The Seller) responding to these inquiries, confirming he would check on the heated steering wheel feature. Additionally, @alfaman asked about the presence of a spare tire or mobility kit, to which @Crushap replied he would verify the details. This exchange indicates that some potential buyers are keen on clarifying features before making a decision.
Negative: On the other hand, some comments raised concerns or sought clarification on certain aspects of the vehicle. @jrock720 asked about a reported accident, leading @Crushap to explain the minor incident involving a car wash mishap, implying there was no significant damage. @Calli74 expressed skepticism about the heated steering wheel being an option in the 2018 model year, implying that the seller may need to clarify this further. Furthermore, @Bartrix's humorous take on using the trailer hitch highlighted concerns regarding the warranty and durability with modifications, reflecting some hesitance regarding the car's utility.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous favorable comments highlighting its appealing characteristics. @60robert praised the MGB for its aesthetics, complimenting its beautiful color and desirable features such as BL badges and a wood shift knob. @Citabria98 fondly recalled the joys of working on these classic cars, emphasizing that this model embodies the classic B sound and nostalgia. Both @Drivewaymonuments and @MGchick contributed to the positive sentiment by remarking on the MGB's usability and driveability, as well as the diligent care and improvements made during its ownership, contributing to its good condition.
Neutral: Comments reflecting neutral perspectives mainly focus on questions regarding the vehicle's condition and auction specifics. @Bforlife raised a question about the car's rebuilt engine at such low mileage, prompting clarification from the seller, @MichaelsMotorCarsPA, who explained the circumstances surrounding the rebuild. @tailpipe and @Cendrick inquired about the auction's reserve price and the car's temperature concerns, respectively, with @Cendrick seeking additional photos of the soft top. These inquiries indicate a genuine interest in the car but lack strong emotional sentiment either way.
Negative: While the overall reception of the vehicle has been positive, there were a few negative comments mainly centered around the aesthetic of certain features. @nickdoc expressed reservations about the appearance of the luggage rack, while @60robert described it as hideous and suggested its removal for a more attractive look. Furthermore, the puzzling need for a rebuild was also a point of concern, with @Bforlife questioning the quick turnaround in mileage and @MGchick noting the unexpected loss of compression, raising potential worries among bidders about the vehicle's long-term reliability.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning appearance and desirable features. @jb9573 notes the Meteor Grey Metallic color as one of Porsche's most beautiful, praising the overall presentation of the 997.2 model. @Lromine mentions that despite the lack of a sport chrono, the car is still very appealing and acknowledges the potential new owner will be lucky to have such a low-mileage, desirable car. @Khoaality exclaims excitement over the chance to buy a car with only 12k miles, emphasizing its rarity and the thrill of owning this exceptional Porsche.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a cautious but interested viewpoint, with inquiries about maintenance history and service records. @adamfam, @randolpho, and @DrDoom all ask specific questions regarding the vehicle's service history, smog compliance, and any needed repairs. @cleanporsche also posits that potential buyers should be aware of the risks associated with low mileage cars, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive records, which may build trust with prospective bidders. Meanwhile, @ckcollectibles (The Seller) is actively responding to questions and providing updates regarding maintenance and the car's condition.
Negative: Concerns are raised by some commenters regarding the vehicle's lack of service history despite its low mileage, which they believe may indicate neglect or deferred maintenance. @DiRo1978 articulates hesitation about bidding without comprehensive service records, while @Bustedknuckle1 points out potential issues such as rust despite the car's description. @l_r_gonzalez and @SteveLilley both express skepticism over the seller's claims, indicating that the absence of documented maintenance could undermine buyer confidence. Overall, some participants are wary, believing that the lack of service documentation may cause complications and affect the car's potential sale price.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The Bentley Continental GTC MULLINER SPEC is praised for its rarity and aesthetic appeal, particularly in its 'triple black' color scheme which makes it stand out from more common models. The seller, @Euro_Classica, notes that the car is in excellent condition, with all services up to date, including recently completed repairs on the front air shocks and proper operation of the soft top without fault codes. Commenters also appreciate the high-quality leather smell inside the vehicle as a bonus.
Neutral: Some comments raised questions about specific repairs, such as the condition of the soft top and whether certain issues were addressed. @dstjohn requested additional details and pictures regarding the soft top and its wear spots, indicating a concern that they might signify potential future problems. @remy22 sought clarification on whether the air shocks were repaired or replaced, demonstrating a desire for transparency about the vehicle's maintenance history.
Negative: Concerns were expressed about potential issues with the soft top, with @lolaracer pointing out indicative damage that could suggest the need for further repairs. Additionally, @dstjohn's inquiries about the condition of the repair spots suggest apprehension about the overall integrity of the vehicle. There is some uncertainty regarding whether all necessary repairs have been adequately made, which may deter potential buyers who are cautious about hidden problems.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @JaDawgPNW calls the vehicle a "road trip machine" and expresses love for its beauty, describing it as more than just a yacht but rather a ship. @snova appreciates the ride quality and incredible build, emphasizing how nice it is overall. @Deimos5228 admires the vehicle's beautiful exterior color and mentions the almost flawless interior, wishing it were closer for viewing.
Neutral: @SaltyMillennial (The Seller) shares that the vehicle is a great survivor ready for a new owner and encourages potential buyers to reach out with any questions. They also remind bidders that the auction is a No Reserve auction. The seller engages positively with the community by sharing a watercolor painting of the vehicle, showcasing their personality while answering questions promptly.
Negative: @BlackBetty79 points out that the seller mentioned the car will occasionally stumble during a cold start, questioning its reliability after longer periods without use and whether the AC blows cold air. @SaltyMillennial responds affirmatively that the car has always started for them, even after sitting for a week, but confirms that the AC does not blow cold air.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @sparrownaut shared insights about the Gazelle's appeal, noting the option between kit form or factory-built versions and its compatibility with VW or Ford running gear. They mentioned how this specific Gazelle appears to be a factory model or at least a well-executed custom build, complimenting its colors and options that align with their personal preferences from years ago. They expressed a nostalgic connection to the Gazelle, recalling how the kit car was prominently showcased in airports with brochures inviting inquiries, and encouraged potential buyers to consider it for a young family member eager to drive.
Neutral: @jmtwilson, the seller, provided clarifications and background on the Gazelle. He mentioned some minor issues, like the Pioneer head unit not functioning properly and some snaps missing from the canvas top. The seating ingress was noted to require a bit of a maneuver, but he assured that, being 6-1, he found it comfortable with ample space. He added details about his niece's spinal injury and the charity aspect of the auction, intended to support the Craig Foundation in her name, indicating a personal motivation behind the sale.
Negative: @brakeservo shared a cautionary tale about the Gazelle's previous ownership, highlighting a case of misinformation where a subsequent owner falsely claimed it had a Hollywood history. They provided an anecdote about a buyer who, believing the Gazelle was a movie prop, went through great lengths only to discover it had no cinematic ties, emphasizing the importance of accurate vehicle history. Their concerns reflect skepticism about the narrative associated with kit cars, particularly the Gazelle's story through its lineage.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments applaud the stunning aesthetics and restoration of the 1957 Mercedes-Benz 190SL, highlighting its beautiful color combination of black and cognac leather. @Dollycat3 calls it 'absolutely superb' and @MLINKK describes it as 'stunning, beautiful, and classy.' Commenters also appreciate the extensive restoration work that has transformed the vehicle, with @UncleFred1 remarking on how the right color combination enhances its beauty. The attention to detail and high quality of the restoration efforts are repeatedly noted, with @ezxh2 stating it's 'absolutely GORGEOUS' and appearing as if it has been transported back to its original 1950s showroom.
Neutral: Some comments express curiosity regarding specific details related to the restoration and the car's features. @donzidesign requests information about who conducted the restoration, focusing on the accuracy of specific elements like the location of the license plate lights. There are also inquiries about various features of the car, including @Streamliner's question about seat belts. @2FAM (The Seller) provides clarity regarding the restoration process, confirming that their facility did not carry it out and mentioning the lack of seat belts in this model.
Negative: Negative comments are minimal but do surface concerns related to the restoration's accuracy. @donzidesign questions whether the interior material is genuine leather or vinyl, pointing out the visible graining in the pictures. Moreover, @theforce88's simple 'Beautiful car, good luck' could also carry an undercurrent of doubt regarding the authenticity or overall quality. While the majority of feedback is positive, these critical inquiries suggest a cautious approach from some potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @euleronic describes the vehicle as beautiful and highlights the stylish 157 forged wheels, indicating a high appreciation for its aesthetics. @SNATCHOLOPHIGUS also commends the car's beauty and unique color combination, although they express a desire for paddle shifters, which adds a layer of functionality to their admiration. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) echoes similar sentiments, praising the vehicle as a standout model of the 3 series convertibles, describing it as the 'cream of the crop' in terms of design and performance.
Neutral: @Earth2056 inquires about the age of the tires, signaling a focus on practical details rather than aesthetics. In response, @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) clarifies that the tires were installed in 2019 and are in excellent condition, reinforcing their commitment to transparency and reliability. This exchange highlights the importance of detailed vehicle information in the buying process, showcasing the seller's proactive communication in addressing potential buyer concerns.
Negative: Some comments indicate minor drawbacks related to the vehicle. @SNATCHOLOPHIGUS's suggestion for paddle shifters reflects a desire for enhanced driving features, which may be perceived as a limitation for some potential buyers. Although no other stark criticisms were made, the request hints at areas for improvement, demonstrating that while the vehicle is appreciated for its style and condition, there are still some elements that could enhance the overall driving experience.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @topduarte praises the vehicle, calling it an awesome early C4 with Z51 that has been well-driven. @joeveto echoes this sentiment, noting that most C4s at this mileage are typically in poor condition, which emphasizes the good state of this particular car. @ScottNThompson reminisces about a nostalgic experience they had in a similar model, highlighting the car's charm and allure, and wishes the seller good luck with the sale.
Neutral: @Kize13 (The Seller) responds to inquiries regarding the condition of the dash and the sound system, assuring @Venomgg that the dash pad is in nice condition with no cracks, and that the sound system, which has been maintained, functions perfectly. Additionally, @1972vintage shows curiosity regarding the mileage, expressing that 35,000 miles seems believable compared to the posted 135,000, and inquires about the seat condition, to which @Kize13 confirms that they were redone prior to their purchase.
Negative: @maladent poses a question about the date codes on the tires and the condition of the gaskets that may need replacing, indicating a concern about potential maintenance issues. @Kize13 responds that the tires are over 20 years old and confirms that the valve cover and transmission pan gaskets require replacement, which could be seen as a downside by potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Some commenters expressed appreciation for the car's appearance, with @Redbird41 highlighting the attractive color combination, while @cobragtk echoed that sentiment, calling it great-looking. @Michaelplatt1, the seller, seemed engaged and eager to answer inquiries, which added a sense of positive interaction with prospective bidders. Further, @Chefywannab remarked on their enjoyment of the air freshener in the car, indicating a light-hearted interest in the overall experience rather than just the vehicle's specifications.
Neutral: @Michaelplatt1 provided updates and clarifications regarding the car's history and condition. He explained the ownership details, noting that the original owner passed away and the vehicle was transferred to his spouse. There was a discussion among bidders regarding the rear bumper's condition, with @roman347 and @cobragtk seeking additional information and transparency about the damage shown in photos. @Michaelplatt1 reassured potential buyers by stressing a transparent approach and sharing a video with a focus on the bumper issue, aiming to provide as much detail as possible.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the rear bumper damage, which some commenters felt was not adequately addressed. @roman347 noted that calling it a "minor blemish" may not accurately reflect its condition, suggesting that repairs were either attempted poorly or not at all. Commenters like @cobragtk shared skepticism regarding the seller's assessment and requested closer inspection of the damaged areas. The dialogue about this issue indicated a significant level of concern among potential buyers regarding the car's true state and whether they could trust the provided descriptions.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @justjoe13 appreciates the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle, noting it's great to see a white version of it, while @bigmak42 finds the car is in pretty good condition. Additionally, @amgomg wishes luck to potential buyers, reflecting a positive spirit about the auction's prospects. @neal999 expresses admiration for the make and model, commenting on the love for white C55s, which adds to the enthusiasm surrounding the vehicle.
Neutral: @Kyleprice1 (The Seller) provides detailed responses to various inquiries, explaining that the original rims were not available when he purchased the vehicle. He clarifies the emissions situation, confirming that while original catalytic converters do not fit due to modifications, the vehicle has passed required inspections with current aftermarket components. Furthermore, he discusses the performance upgrades, indicating a significant improvement in ride quality with the new suspension system and reassures that there are no error codes present due to the modifications.
Negative: @cjmarka has a note of disappointment regarding the wheels, suggesting they detract from the overall styling of the car but acknowledges their easy replacement. @neal999 raises concerns about whether certain sensors have been replaced and questions the reliability for a long drive, reflecting some apprehension about the vehicle's maintenance history. Overall, there are hints of caution from some commentors regarding the vehicle’s modifications and potential issues.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The auction comments reflect a strong enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly its classification as a K code fastback, which is seen as a significant asset in terms of value. @CodyStang emphasizes that being a K code alone enhances the car's investment potential, while @ammpasha (The Seller) reassures potential buyers about the integrity of the engine, sharing details about a significant investment made in its rebuild. Several commenters, including @Gerry65 and @nordtho18, express interest in the car and provide constructive insights about the authenticity of its features, suggesting the presence of numerous valid indicators that support its classification.
Neutral: Some comments dive into the technical discussions surrounding the K code specification and the authenticity of the GT package. @Tdmaddux raises questions about the nuances of the car's details, such as the misalignment of the grille bars. @scott1221 requests a cold start and driving video, emphasizing curiosity over performance rather than outright judgement. Overall, there is a mix of admiration for the car and a desire for further clarity regarding its features and authenticity, underscored by a variety of technical inquiries and requests for additional information.
Negative: However, the auction is not without contention. @rowdy expresses doubt about the car being a factory GT, citing critical tests that they performed during a previous inspection which the car allegedly failed. This view aligns with some scepticism surrounding the car's originality, leading to heated exchanges between commenters and the seller. @Haulgas expresses frustration over the drama unfolding in the comments, while other users collectively question aspects of the car's authenticity, such as the condition of the fog light wiring and the originality of certain parts. The discourse hints at underlying tensions, particularly around the seller's defensive responses to accusations regarding the car's history.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Dspoljaric and @danny7700 (The Seller) described the BMW Z4 M Roadster as a fantastic driving experience, particularly enjoyed with the top down. @danny7700 (The Seller) emphasized how well the car has been maintained, highlighting its immaculate condition and low mileage of just over 33,298 miles, which averages less than 2000 miles a year. Comments from @mherrer1 praised the seller's communication and the quality of the pre-purchase inspection (PPI) being conducted by a reputable shop, Eurofed, further emphasizing the value of the car.
Neutral: The discussion included some questions regarding the vehicle's history and condition, such as @philneely's inquiry about the discrepancy in ownership records and @Swest25's request for service records before the 10k-mile oil service. @eprochase raised concerns about the age of the tires, which @danny7700 (The Seller) confirmed were indeed 15 years old but maintained that they had sufficient tread and minimal UV damage due to being garage kept. @tjpalmer125 also asked for details on cosmetic imperfections, showing that potential buyers are carefully assessing the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the car's maintenance and history. @OIBDon questioned the age of the tires and the reasons behind the replacement of engine shims, seeking clarity on who performed the work. @j_scott_campbell and @chris_l_waller noted common wear issues like seat and center console damage, indicating potential challenges in sourcing replacement parts. Furthermore, comments from various users reflected a cautious approach to bidding, emphasizing the importance of thorough inspections and transparent history in the purchasing process.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters have expressed their affection for the vehicle, highlighting its performance and aesthetic appeal. @JKB likens it to their first Porsche, calling it fabulous, while @rennen notes how the owner takes meticulous care of the car, stating that it performs as beautifully as it looks. The sentiment is echoed by @MTH, who reassures potential buyers that there are no IMS or bore score issues to worry about, encouraging them to simply buy, drive, and enjoy. Additionally, @rlaverty emphasizes that early 5-speed base Caymans represent the best fun value available today.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the technical aspects of the vehicle, with inquiries regarding the IMS bearing and other specific maintenance items. @alowrey2022 asks for information on the IMS bearing, and @dvcar1 inquires about the water pump and clutch status, showing a common concern among prospective buyers about the car's maintenance history. @Mx5er, acting as the seller's representative, provides answers to these queries, emphasizing the car's overall reliability and maintenance records. Comparisons are drawn to other models, with @dougdadmac and @Caymanorcarrera commenting on their past experiences with similar Cayman models.
Negative: A few comments reveal concerns about the car's features and condition. @lune expresses hesitation about the LED running lights, questioning their removal and the ease of sourcing original lights. @Goseecal and @JPAtl raise questions about whether critical components like the struts and water pump have been replaced, reflecting apprehensions about the car’s long-term reliability. @Spokayman also provides insights about the difficulties in returning the car to stock lights, which may deter some buyers. However, these concerns are met with detailed answers from the seller, attempting to assuage buyer fears.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @rtjacobites (The Seller) expresses gratitude to bidders for viewing the auction of the Defender 90 and hopes everyone had a safe fourth of July. The seller highlights the owner's passion for Defenders and emphasizes that significant effort has gone into enhancing this particular vehicle. They encourage potential bidders to view the videos and photos that showcase the car's excellent condition while assuring them that they are available to answer questions or provide additional information during the auction.
Neutral: @19Willys46 inquires whether the doors of the vehicle can be removed, while @vate333 requests if it would be possible to obtain videos of the vehicle being driven and of a cold start without any music in the background. @millig67 admires the refurbishment and asks if any of the new rear windows can open or vent, which prompts a detailed response from the seller.
Negative: There are no negative comments mentioned regarding the vehicle. All interactions seem to focus on inquiries about features and additional video requests, indicating a general interest without any expressed dissatisfaction.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Aubrey (The Seller) has been proactive in addressing inquiries about the vehicle, emphasizing its excellent condition and quality by mentioning that they have received the '2024-2025 Quality Dealer of the Year' award. They describe the vehicle as a 'pristine Z3' and express excitement about the auction, inviting potential buyers to ask questions freely. Their responses have been thorough; for example, @Aubrey assured @bakerdb09 that the automatic top is in great condition with no tears or leaks, and indicated that they would provide further details and a video confirmation soon.
Neutral: Several inquiries have been made regarding specific features of the vehicle. @BillBoner asked about the soft top, and @Aubrey confirmed it is automatic. @kingfisherwi requested pictures of the trunk, which @Aubrey affirmed are available in the gallery, and offered to provide more if needed. @bakerdb09 posed multiple questions, including inquiries about the automatic top's function, Bluetooth capabilities, tire conditions, and the possibility of a long drive post-purchase, which @Aubrey promised to address with additional information shortly.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by potential buyers about the vehicle's features and potential performance after purchase. @bakerdb09 highlighted a discrepancy in the vehicle's description regarding the soft top being manual or automatic, pointing out potential confusion that might affect buyers’ confidence. Additionally, their request for confirmation on the Bluetooth stereo and the age or condition of the tires suggests some uncertainty about the overall reliability and readiness of the vehicle for long trips, which could deter interested bidders.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has received positive remarks regarding its exterior and interior condition, noted by @gscharnagl who commented on the impressive paint and well-preserved features including the wheels, leather, and wood trim. The seller, @aegmotorsports, has highlighted numerous premium features of this 2006 Mercedes Benz A209 CLK500, mentioning its powerful 5.0L V8 engine, luxury upgrades such as the Comfort Package, multi-contour driver seat, and a high-quality sound system, which emphasize its allure and desirability. The promise of a no reserve auction adds to the excitement of potential buyers looking for a great deal.
Neutral: Several comments are oriented towards inquiries and information about the vehicle rather than being strictly positive or negative. @gscharnagl asked about the functionalities provided in the multi-contour driver's seat, clarifying whether it included active adjustments or a massaging feature. The seller responded positively by providing detailed information about the car's offerings, which may indicate a willingness to engage with potential buyers and address their queries, thereby creating a knowledgeable exchange without strong emotional overtones.
Negative: The seller @aegmotorsports did address potential concerns by mentioning that any flickering observed in the instrument cluster and center screen during videos is not reflective of actual performance, dismissing it as a camera-related issue. However, there is no glaring negative commentary about the vehicle itself; it's primarily focused on clarifying the seller's statements about the instrument cluster's appearance, which may suggest a concern about the vehicle's perceived quality or reliability from the perspective of potential bidders.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments about the vehicle are overwhelmingly positive, with many praising its immaculate condition and stunning appearance. @Greglt61 expresses amazement at the quality of the Mercedes, while @murphyjoh states that it is as perfect as one can get. @whipcity76 and @LoneRanger99 also commend the car, calling it a 'Dean'o Car' and 'nice,' respectively. @Collectibleclassics highlights the potential value of the vehicle, suggesting it could reach close to $100,000 at auction, and appreciates Dean's ability to present high-quality classic cars. Overall, commenters marvel at the car's collector-grade quality and express confidence in @Dean_Laumbach as a reputable seller.
Neutral: Several comments offer a neutral perspective, noting aspects of the vehicle's specifications and market context. @ilpatino expresses curiosity about the KE-jetronic system and its significance, indicating a thoughtful approach to the auction process. @scscarborough acknowledges @Dean_Laumbach's expertise in preparing and presenting his vehicles. Additionally, participants like @89lincolntc and @Yvr911 share their own experiences with purchasing classic cars, indicating a broader conversation about market dynamics and the condition of collector vehicles in general. The comments balance between admiration and a consideration of the auction process and the vehicles available in the market.
Negative: There are a few comments that carry a mildly negative tone, although they remain constructive. @JustaGlitch humorously mentions a dealer rivalry, suggesting competition among sellers. Some comments raise questions about paint readings, with @Jojogolong expressing confusion about low paint thickness measurements, which some may interpret as a potential issue. However, @Dean_Laumbach addresses these concerns directly, ensuring that the buyer understands the quality and craftsmanship. Overall, negative sentiments are scarce, reflecting more of a curiosity than outright concern.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the truck, noting its beauty and value. @dcast2 remarked that watching the auction would be fun, and @BR_549 praised the truck's appearance, acknowledging its potential despite some issues. @1976w123 emphasized that the cracked dash is not a significant problem, suggesting that it is an easy fix with paint to match, highlighting that it's a great truck for the price.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the condition of the dashboard, particularly regarding the peculiar crack that was mentioned. @Rpharesjr noted that while the crack could be repaired, fixed dashboards often do not last long. @Kiwiss11, the seller, explained that the truck spent most of its early life in Florida, which may have affected the dashboard's condition. They also directed other commenters to previous auction photos for a better understanding of the truck's condition, specifically the dash damage.
Negative: Concerns about the dashboard's condition were prevalent, with @Rpharesjr questioning whether the truck had been parked outside for an extended period, which could have led to such damage. @BR_549 echoed this sentiment by referencing the previous auction photos where the dash appeared undamaged and inquiring how the damage occurred. Additionally, @CastellanMC questioned whether the truck had been painted, indicating potential issues with previous modifications.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several comments express positive interest in the vehicle, particularly highlighting its appealing color combination. @pacers35 mentions that they really love this color combo and another commenter, @HasCars, describes the car as a great daily driver with a recent PA state inspection, emphasizing that it has a clean Carfax with no accidents and 29 service records from three long-time owners. Additionally, the seller assures potential buyers about the vehicle's capabilities, mentioning that it accelerated and shifted well after inspection.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding specific features and logistical details regarding the vehicle. @UscPhd97_ asks about the cold air conditioning and any potential fluid leaks, to which the seller(@HasCars) confirms the AC is cold and notes that there were no visible signs of leaks or bushings deterioration. Other logistical questions from commenters, like @goldgrizzly regarding shipping costs to Denver and the best airport for fly-in drive home, indicate a serious interest but also a need for detailed information about the purchasing process.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about the condition of the vehicle, with @pacers35 questioning the missing or cracked metal parts in the undercarriage photos and seeking more details on the tire date codes. @goldgrizzly also asks if there is any rust on the undercarriage or rocker panels. The seller(@HasCars) addresses these concerns, stating that there is no significant rust but acknowledges surface oxidation on some bolts. While the seller does their best to provide accurate information and transparency, the inquiries suggest that potential buyers have reservations about the condition of certain components and want assurance before making a commitment.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @dieselcoondog appreciates the design of the vehicle, noting that GM's Cadillac and Pontiac successfully made stacked quad headlights work, calling the machine beautiful. @Dollycat3 praises the Cotillion White color and beautiful interior, while @Napolison expresses admiration for the elegant white and black color scheme, reminiscing about their own experience with a 1970 Coupe DeVille, highlighting their love for big Cadillac coupes.
Neutral: Comments reflect a mix of nostalgia and aesthetic appreciation, with @classicguy57 recalling fond memories of their father's vehicle similar to the one being discussed. @CaptainGW raises a question about the climate control system, which @2013NaherNora (The Seller) confirms is functional. Different users also inquire about maintenance history and various features of the car, such as the heater core and rear windows.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the functionality of the vehicle, as @Al_Loco points out a looped heater hose that could indicate issues with the heat, while @ChasSidwa questions what other functions might not be working. @RevBuzz warns about the four-wheel drum brakes, hinting at safety concerns, and @GP65 challenges the seller's claim regarding the age of the tires, suggesting they might be older than stated.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its overall cleanliness and appeal. @ALGEE17 described the Jeep as beautiful, while @allin938 noted how clean it appears. These positive impressions are further supported by @EuroAp2GX (The Seller), who reassured bidders of the vehicle's low mileage and mentioned that all recent maintenance, including an oil change and battery replacement, has been completed. The seller also indicated that a valid CA smog would be included in the purchase, adding to buyer confidence.
Neutral: Several comments focused on inquiries rather than opinions about the car's condition. @lucky12345678910 asked if the air conditioning is functional, to which @EuroAp2GX (The Seller) confirmed that it blows cold air and stated that, to his knowledge, the vehicle has not been repainted. @JoshuaSharf raised questions about the condition of the sway bars and whether the vehicle has been inspected recently, highlighting that being a two-door model might pose challenges for child seat installation, which @EuroAp2GX responded to, reassuring that the seat belts are accessible.
Negative: A few concerns were raised regarding potential issues with the vehicle. @Uby67vw1958 pointed out the front chrome grill's rusting, which the seller acknowledged as an easy fix. Additionally, @planejeep raised questions about possible leaks in the differentials and the condition of the transfer case, prompting @EuroAp2GX (The Seller) to clarify that no work had been done on those components during his ownership and that he hadn't noticed any leaks. These concerns suggest some apprehension among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's long-term condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Jagbuxx noted the nice touch with the special order black seaming laces on the seats, which adds to the vehicle's overall appeal. @carfan1978 praised the color combination, highlighting its attractiveness, although he mentioned the top does not operate well on its own. @GDogg described the vehicle as a fantastic Eldorado convertible, while @JustaGlitch enthusiastically exclaimed it as fantastic with his exclamation. Additionally, @Marcus73 encouraged additional details like the Auto Dimmer high beams and remote trunk release, celebrating the car's beauty further.
Neutral: Comments from @Riversidefarms and @Graystone raised questions about the vehicle's functionality, asking if all components such as the air conditioning, power steering, and soft top are operational. @gkirk79 (The Seller) responded to both, confirming that while the soft top operates adequately down, it requires assistance to go up and noted that the air conditioning needs charging, as it doesn't cool effectively although the compressor activates. There was also a light-hearted exchange between @TurboChris and @Rynoclarke, referencing the car's cultural significance mentioned in a Johnny Cash song.
Negative: @boypromo expressed concern about the catalytic converter being removed, indicating it would likely fail smog checks in California and similar states. This raises red flags regarding the vehicle's compliance with environmental regulations. Furthermore, the issues with the soft top and air conditioning functionality may detract from the overall desirability of the vehicle for potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have highlighted the vehicle's unique color and vintage appeal, particularly praising the Peru Red hue and the solid condition of the car for its age. @ScoobyDone mentioned the great model year and color, while @tferrer called Peru Red a lovely color, indicating its desirability. @Carlo186 noted the original features, such as the flares resembling those of the 1973 RS models, and praised the car's history of being well-kept in collections. Additional comments suggest the car has great potential as a collector's item, with several commenters, including @misaak and @techweenie, supporting the idea that it could be an excellent candidate for restoration or maintaining as a classic driver.
Neutral: Several commenters focused on the technical aspects and history of the vehicle, including the requested compression test and inquiries about missing components, such as the A/C system. @jcp911s raised concerns about the 2.7 engine's historical issues but acknowledged that many have likely been upgraded over time. @Carlo186 confirmed the results of a recent compression test, while also indicating that the vehicle has undergone some modifications over the years. It was pointed out that although some paint issues exist, there is potential for improvement through detailing and selective touch-ups, suggesting a balanced view of the vehicle's current state.
Negative: On the downside, some critiques emerged regarding modifications and missing original parts. @speedster911 noted discrepancies in the vehicle's modifications, such as the ducktail and license plate light covers, while also questioning A/C availability. @Labrador3color expressed concern about the cost of repairs and the auction value. Furthermore, issues with the 2.7 engine were highlighted, with commenters emphasizing the need for a thorough evaluation of the engine's condition, as indicated by the varying compression readings provided by @Carlo186. Overall, while some considered the car a solid driver, there were reservations about its original state and functionality.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) emphasizes the unique and pristine condition of this 1999 Ford Mustang GT Convertible, highlighting its special status as a 35th Anniversary edition. They express enthusiasm about the vehicle, noting that it inspires a strong desire among potential buyers. The dealership prides itself on smooth and transparent transactions, achieving an impressive 4.9/5.0 rating on Google with numerous 5-star reviews from satisfied customers, reflecting a commitment to quality service.
Neutral: Commentators such as @newcarpro provide relevant details about the car's specifications, including its build date, engine type, and other technical information. They include warranty data that reflects the vehicle's service history, ensuring potential buyers have a comprehensive understanding of what they are considering. Additionally, @homie3186 raises a question about the vehicle's wheels, pointing out that the current ones are not the correct style for this model, suggesting a detail worth addressing without negative connotations.
Negative: @idrivemine points out a potential flaw by stating that the wheels currently on the vehicle do not match the unique style originally designed for the 35th Anniversary Mustang, which could be a drawback for collectors and enthusiasts seeking authenticity. This observation could raise concerns about the vehicle's original integrity and might deter some buyers who prioritize original specifications. Overall, while the vehicle has many positive attributes, the wheels issue remains a significant note of criticism that could impact collector interest.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @natkingcolebasket69 expresses interest in the vehicle, noting that the photos seem to be taken in Summerlin, showing a positive inclination towards it. @Ratty shares a complimentary view on the same model, highlighting their own version of the car and emphasizing that it is a great ride. @GDogg also admires the vehicle, describing it as a great-looking Triple Black E320 Cabriolet and wishing the seller good luck with the sale.
Neutral: @natkingcolebasket69 raises a question regarding the rear top, sensing something unusual and inquiring if it is OEM. The seller, @mjselleck, responds, explaining that the top was likely replaced around 2010 and has maintained its color without visible concerns. @Mike1486 comments on the completed wiring harness replacement, expressing gratitude in relation to the car's maintenance and love for the triple black color.
Negative: @Captbob73 points out a concern regarding the driver’s door, noting that it appears not to be flush with the body when closed, particularly in photos #9 and #13. The seller, @mjselleck, acknowledges this issue but states there is no known damage or difficulty with closing the door. Furthermore, @mjselleck also addresses a mechanical concern about the top's operation, mentioning a missing spring on one side and detailing past replacements of hydraulic components, indicating potential areas of repair and maintenance needed.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @JungNamHoo expressed excitement about the vehicle, highlighting the electronic dashboard as a nostalgic element reminiscent of an 80s sci-fi movie, which adds to the vehicle's charm. @newcarpro simply described the vehicle as a nice one, reinforcing positive impressions. Overall, the feedback indicates an appreciation for the unique features and aesthetic appeal of the vehicle.
Neutral: Comments by @montentoyz and @simpley49 reflect a curiosity for more detailed visuals and information about the vehicle, such as a driving video and the condition of certain parts, indicating a desire for transparency rather than outright concerns. @tmckeever (The Seller) addressed these inquiries by confirming that everything works without mechanical leaks and provided some reassurance about the air conditioning system's functionality after it was serviced. @Racecars also sought clarification on the ownership history of the truck.
Negative: @montentoyz raised potential concerns regarding the visible corrosion in a specific area and requested a closer look at it, while @problemchildauto pointed out what appeared to be a broken tire belt in one of the photos, indicating worry about the vehicle's condition. @tmckeever (The Seller) clarified that the tire issue was just an undulation due to manufacturing, but the mention of rust skepticism from @T_RexHi5 and the general need for more detailed examination reflect some reservations about the vehicle's overall state.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @MJGerhart (The Seller) mentioned that the vehicle is satellite radio capable and comes with original chrome headlight rings and carpet floor mats. The seller also has all yearly state inspection receipts, indicating that routine maintenance has been kept up. @LuvBritCars highlighted the fun driving experience of the MINI Roadster, expressing excitement over its performance. Another commenter, @whoosh, confirmed that the car handles well, with @MJGerhart noting that it corners like it's on rails and has the right amount of power for an exciting drive.
Neutral: There were some clarifications regarding the model of the vehicle. @squirrellymerley asked for confirmation on whether the vehicle is a Roadster or an S model, and @MJGerhart clarified that it is indeed a non-S model. @LuvBritCars requested an update to the listing description to prevent confusion for potential bidders. Additionally, there were inquiries about the condition of the vehicle; @whoosh asked for underside pictures and a video of spirited driving, while @MJGerhart explained the challenges in obtaining undercarriage photos from a hoist.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the low mileage of the vehicle, with @LuvBritCars questioning why it only has 10K miles despite being 12 years old. @whoosh expressed skepticism about the performance of the base engine, inquiring whether it has enough horsepower. There was also a suggestion from @whoosh for @MJGerhart to provide more visual evidence of the car's condition, reflecting a desire for greater transparency regarding the vehicle's maintenance and performance records.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters admire the vehicle's stunning appearance and historic significance. @koolcar describes it as 'gorgeous' and highlights its unique features, like leather-wrapped leaf springs, while @Dollycat3 calls it a 'magnificent, rare, stunning Fleetdowns,' noting its incredible styling and award-winning status. @915fan appreciates the design continuity between this 1930s Cadillac and the 1980 Fleetwood Brougham, and @cascadia reflects on the impressive statement it made for its first owner, affirming its status as 'The Standard of the World.'
Neutral: A few users discuss the condition of the car, particularly the paint issue shown in photo 29, which @bmorri58 (The Seller) clarifies is limited to one area and was present at the time of purchase. The Seller also responds to inquiries about the car's function and condition, revealing that while the cigarette lighter and heater are not currently operational, they can be repaired. Additionally, @Red99 requests a driving video to showcase the vehicle's performance, which @bmorri58 promises to upload, indicating ongoing engagement with potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about the vehicle's upkeep and functionality. @koolcar questions why the car has only been driven 300 miles since 2008 and seeks clarity on what doesn't work on the car. Additionally, there is skepticism about the increase in price, indicated by @richbossi20. @RobertMatson expresses concern regarding potential 'key damage,' which sparks a defense from other users, but it highlights the scrutiny the vehicle faces regarding its condition and history.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GTOinTexas provided detailed responses to inquiries about the bike's tires and frame. The seller stated that the bike has good tread on the tires without any cracking, suggesting that they are well-maintained. Additionally, the seller compared the bike's frame to a Harley Softail, explaining the subtle differences, which is appreciated by potential buyers looking for specific features.
Neutral: @tika911 and @shortfielder expressed curiosity about aspects of the bike. @tika911 inquired about the age of the tires and any work done on the brake caliper, while @shortfielder asked about the similarities between the bike's frame and a Harley Softail frame. These questions indicate interest and a desire for more information before making a decision.
Negative: There were no negative comments about the vehicle, as all interactions were focused on gathering information about the bike's features and condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg praises the stunning bronze color over light brown of the 356B Coupe, while @Mountiedawg (The Seller) agrees, stating that the car's beautiful hue particularly shines in sunlight. They highlight the hard work put into restoring the vehicle, ensuring it has always been garaged and only briefly exposed to the rain. @GoSlowMan appreciates the car's presentability and flawless cold start, while @Bartruff1 shares a nostalgic sentiment about the car's value, recommending the seller reconsider selling such an iconic model.
Neutral: @Mountiedawg (The Seller) mentions the car has a COA confirming its original color and offers to provide video evidence of its performance upon their return. @petechop asks about auction reserves and is informed by @pgharris that there is a reserve, explaining how it appears on the auction page. @michaelchambers inquires about cold start and driving videos, to which @Mountiedawg (The Seller) responds affirmatively, promising to try and share them soon. @dougdadmac shares details about the vehicle's history and suggests additional photos to confirm specifics about the car's components.
Negative: @Bartruff1 expresses regret about selling their own 356B Coupe, warning @Mountiedawg (The Seller) that there may still be time to cancel the sale and that the car will only appreciate in value over time. @GoSlowMan notes that while the car has a flawless cold start, it does suffer from a rough idle, which could be a concern for potential buyers. @dougdadmac points out that the car had undergone some changes during its production year, reflecting on the unique features that might be of interest to enthusiasts.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters appreciate the truck's maintenance and reliability, with @VerbalDiarrhea noting its potential for longevity and specific features like the dark blue interior. @JayKay2430 praises the seller's upkeep, stating that such care leads to vehicles lasting longer, while @weim55, a self-identified Chevy truck enthusiast, shares their past ownership experience, emphasizing the truck's comfort, reliability, and good fuel efficiency. @rtizx (The Seller) confirms a history of good mileage, with reports of getting 22 mpg on the highway and recognizes the impressive mileage achieved by others.
Neutral: Some discussions revolve around the truck's specifications, such as the box length. @Thepontiacranch asks for clarification on this detail, and @rtizx (The Seller) confirms it is 6 1/2 feet. There's also a dialogue about the possibility of more recent models, like the 2025 Silverado, lasting as long as older models. @KROD argues about the durability of newer engines, mentioning experiences with high-mileage models, while @rtizx (The Seller) encourages potential bidders to contact him regarding the auction. Furthermore, @rtizx provides clarifying comments about the vehicle’s CarFax report and minor damage history.
Negative: Concerns about damage have been raised, specifically regarding a CarFax report. @rtizx (The Seller) addresses these worries by explaining that the reported damage pertains to a superficial scrape on the truck's right side and clarifying that it has not affected the paint. There are no significant negative comments from other users; however, some skepticism exists regarding whether new vehicles can achieve similar longevity to older models, suggesting a divide in opinions on vehicle durability based on maintenance and technology.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters have expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its fun and clean condition. @GBRBiLL noted that the bike could almost pass for new, despite the blued pipes, and @yanmarley complimented its appearance compared to his higher-mileage bike. @Pace_Adorno shared fond memories of his adventures on a similar model, appreciating the vehicle's versatility for various terrains and the camaraderie it fosters among riders. Additionally, @weaselgnome (The Seller) responded positively to @Slimgonewest's mention of a Ural enthusiast's travel stories, showcasing an inviting community around the bike.
Neutral: Several comments addressed the vehicle's specifications and riding experience without strong bias. @Slimgonewest inquired about the cruising speed, to which @weaselgnome (The Seller) confirmed a top speed of 70 MPH with a comfortable cruising range of 60-65 MPH. Furthermore, discussions touched on the rear wheel drive aspect, with @wardsimpson receiving a straightforward confirmation from @weaselgnome. @aduthie provided insights based on personal experience regarding the rim situation, voicing an opinion that the NHTSA's recall might have been excessive, which was acknowledged respectfully by other commenters.
Negative: Concerns about a safety recall were raised, with @daveswanson specifically questioning whether the rim recall had been addressed. While acknowledging @aduthie's expertise on the rims, he cautioned against selling a vehicle with an open safety issue. @weaselgnome (The Seller) expressed gratitude for the reminder about the recall, admitting it was previously unknown to him and emphasized the importance of transparency in discussions regarding the bike's condition. However, he felt reassured by @aduthie's comments about the rims' current condition, even as the possibility of the recall might raise red flags for potential buyers.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Frida: This looks like a really nice, honest 1973 Porsche 911T Coupe 5-Speed! The 2.4L CIS engine is praised as being a great setup when properly dialed in. The aftermarket heavy-duty air conditioning system is mentioned to likely perform better than the original options, with the radiator condenser kit under the car enhancing cooling efficiency. Overall, it is described as an appealing and rare early 911T in original condition, reflecting the sentiment of excitement among potential buyers.
Neutral: @Mwrench (The Seller) responds to inquiries about the vehicle and aspects of its condition. For those asking about specific features and history, such as the original engine or recommended local shops for a Pre-Purchase Inspection (PPI), the seller provides valuable details and clarifications based on queries from potential buyers. Some comments also raise questions about specific features, including seats and the existence of a Kardex, showcasing a mix of curiosity and need for more information.
Negative: @ebrand expresses dissatisfaction about the rubber overriders on the vehicle, finding them unattractive and questioning whether they could be swapped for chrome alternatives. @VinceLombardi raises concerns about possible paint imperfections and indicates that the car might be a project vehicle. Additionally, @70SATMan points out issues with the stocks seats, implying they are not correct for the model, which leads to questions about the vehicle's authenticity. Overall, some comments reflect reservations about the car's condition and originality.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @UltraMotorSource (The Seller) has presented the vehicle as a 'fantastic one-owner machine,' emphasizing that it is in great condition and ship-shape, which can instill confidence in potential buyers. The seller has also assured that they are prepared to assist with shipping, making it convenient for buyers in the continental US, thereby enhancing the overall positive perception of the sale.
Neutral: @dklanecky1 expressed interest in whether there is any maintenance history available for the bike, which is a common consideration among buyers looking to gauge the vehicle's overall health. @rexcus welcomed @UltraMotorSource back, indicating that the seller has a history of engaging with the community, suggesting a familiarity that may influence buyer trust.
Negative: @UltraMotorSource clarified that they do not have detailed maintenance records available due to the previous owner's passing, which may concern potential buyers. The fact that the seller has no historical receipts could raise questions regarding the bike's past care, despite their thorough inspection indicating no major issues beyond the tires.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the car, highlighting its beauty and desirability. @tjahome noted that the in-car video was so compelling that it could have influenced his life choices during his youth. @CRUSH simply exclaimed, "Pure sex!!", while @theforce88 called it a beautiful car, wishing good luck in the auction. @Jamespw1 encouraged bidders to appreciate the car, asserting that it was a stunning model and hinting that the last video would certainly impress snowballing interest. Additionally, @boaboyoz described it as a spectacular Spurgeon 991.2 GT3 RS Weissach, calling it a sensational specimen. Overall, the sentiment from these comments clearly showcases a consensus that this vehicle is an exceptional and stunning machine.
Neutral: Several comments focused on inquiries about the car's track history and specifications. @ChadGee asked about the amount of track time the car had seen, demonstrating a specific interest in understanding the vehicle's performance history. @cdushane sought further details regarding paint protection film (PPF) application and the potential for removing the roll bar without damage. @reskewjr mentioned the reliability of his similar model with higher mileage, showing that the GT3 RS model maintains its quality over time. Additionally, @JHBBII provided insights on the paint options available for the 2016 GT3 RS, adding informative context to the discussion about the car's aesthetics and details. These neutral comments reflect genuine curiosity about the car's history and features.
Negative: A few remarks raised concerns regarding the car's apparent condition, specifically regarding its track use and its expected performance longevity. @Carsco questioned whether the car had been tracked, observing signs that indicated it might have experienced regular track use. Similarly, others expressed caution, like @getto822000, who speculated about the low mileage of 3,500 and the implication that it might not have been extensively used on the track. Although not overtly negative, these comments suggest a level of hesitation among potential bidders about the vehicle's usage history and care, implying that while the car is desirable, thorough evaluation may be necessary before purchase.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters praised the overall quality and appearance of the buggy. @Luckywheels noted its cleanliness and expressed appreciation for the roll bar mounts. @CDehne highlighted the original seats and the modifications to the dash, while @CLTLarry described it as a beautifully done 'glitter-bug.' Additionally, @HotRodRon1932 provided a glowing endorsement of @Mkerwin's craftsmanship, emphasizing the thorough rebuild and exceptional paint job, suggesting that the buggy had the potential to win awards at car shows. @McRosacci also complimented the newly designed dash, indicating it both looked authentic and improved upon the original design.
Neutral: The discussion included several queries about specific components and features of the buggy. @Dave-ooo asked about the purpose of the 2x4s in certain photos and received clarification from @Mkerwin, who explained their use during the lifting process. Others, like @OBagMan, inquired about the absence of cooling tins and the lack of a seal at the bottom of the windshield. @Mkerwin addressed these questions by discussing the design choices and his experiences regarding cooling, asserting that the engine remains sufficiently cooled without the tins. @Mkerwin also mentioned that he had lost access to most of the build pictures, generating curiosity among potential buyers about the rebuild's history.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the buggy's features or lack thereof. @NorCalBert questioned the absence of cooling tins under the cylinders, indicating a potential oversight in cooling considerations. @OBagMan also brought up the lack of a windshield seal, pointing out that it could lead to issues with water entry into the cabin. While the issues noted did not significantly detract from the positive feedback overall, they reflected some buyers' desire for additional details regarding the buggy's construction and functionality.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @wyo911 expresses strong enthusiasm for the vehicle, calling it 'the one,' while @EdmontonCarGuy appreciates the unique engine design of the BMW K75, noting it has a slanted 3 configuration, which is different from the traditionally opposed engines of BMW bikes. @wxflyer highlights the top-notch reputation of @Dean_Laumbach (The Seller), indicating that he is known for providing high-quality motorcycles. @SDCR compliments the K75's smooth engine performance and durability, stating it runs forever and retains a good power-to-weight ratio, while others like @folmonty and @LaneFM share positive experiences, noting the K75's touring capabilities and comfort.
Neutral: Several commenters have posed inquiries about the specifics of the vehicle’s maintenance and history. @willy asks about the tune-up details, potential temporary registration for cross-country travel, and the validity of the 1,000-mile mileage claim. @Dean_Laumbach (The Seller) responds to these queries by explaining the tune-up process and expressing concerns about the reliability of the original components for long trips. Meanwhile, @drilan123 inquires about shipping costs to the UK, further indicating international interest in the vehicle. @thiswonthurt mentions various features of the bike, including fairing-mounted speakers and fuel pump access, while sharing suggestions for maintenance.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, some concerns exist regarding the bike's original parts and potential issues. @OldZzz humorously points out issues related to the odometer, suggesting it may stop working over time, and reflects on a past experience with similar BMW issues. @SDCR notes maintenance necessities like replacing cooling hoses and the need for fuel system checkups, as well as a few quirks of the K75 related to oil drainage during storage. The potential for breakdowns in long storied history due to age is echoed by @Dean_Laumbach (The Seller) as he cautions against long-distance travel on an original, low-mileage motorcycle, advising prospective buyers to be cautious about the vehicle's age and condition.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a significant amount of interest, with @minidude noting that there were real bids on day one reaching up to $18,000, and expressing a wish to own such a 'sweet truck.' This highlights the desirability of the model. Additionally, @Gearhed64 points out that the short bed 'Custom' model from 1964-1966, especially with a small back window, is what many potential buyers are looking for.
Neutral: @JayKay2430 provides some insight into the truck's historical specifications, suggesting that it was originally fitted with a three-speed manual column shift, as the turbo hydramatic transmission was not available in the 1/2 ton variant in 1966. @rowdy adds to this by requesting to see the data plate and expresses a differing opinion about the desirability of the panorama back window, while also agreeing with @JayKay2430 regarding the visual clues of the shift boot on the column.
Negative: Conversely, @rowdy also expresses skepticism towards @Gearhed64's opinion, highlighting a disagreement on what buyers truly want in the vehicle's features. This suggests that there might be differing opinions on the truck's attributes among potential buyers. Furthermore, @mark3665, the seller, provides additional context about the vehicle’s transmission history, indicating that it originally had a three-speed on the column but later modifications were made to enhance its capacity for towing.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commentators expressed excitement about the 1951 Packard Henney ambulance, highlighting its unique character and the seller's efforts to maintain its original patina. @Sparrownaut called it their favorite listing that day, appreciating the historical significance of the Henney-Packard association. @sgntpepper78 reflected on their own nostalgia, drawing connections to vintage vehicles, and @CLTLarry noted the beauty of the car, praising BaT for showcasing such unique options. Overall, there was a sense of admiration for the seller's stewardship and the potential for it to be cherished by a new custodian.
Neutral: A few comments offered neutral observations about the condition and features of the ambulance. @PackardDon made clarifications regarding the model year, stating that the vehicle should be considered a 1952 based on the VIN. @tinhunter brought up technical questions regarding the vehicle's electrical system, wondering about the 12V conversion. Concerns about the needed maintenance and possible restoration were also addressed, with some commenters expressing interest in keeping it in original livery while others discussed potential modifications. Additionally, @2021Scout inquired about logistics for a long-distance journey in the vehicle, indicating uncertainty about the experience with older vehicles.
Negative: On the downside, there were some comments reflecting skepticism about the vehicle's readiness for extensive use. @siatarick noted that it might require more work than just an LS swap to make it track-ready, hinting at possible mechanical issues. @Ranchero65 suggested that this automobile might become a long-term project for multiple owners due to its condition. Additionally, @Crazy_Canadian jokingly expressed a desire to turn the ambulance into a drag car, possibly indicating doubts about its current performance. Overall, while the vehicle has its enthusiasts, there were underlying concerns about its practicality and the restoration process.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @mtr25 describes the bike as incredible and mentions having owned a few. @2doors calls it a wicked looking machine, complimenting the beauty of this generation of V-Max and specifically praising the seller's bike as 'boss.' @rofandofy refers to it as a great example of a legendary motorcycle, while @GR7 shares a personal anecdote about a friend's VMAX, emphasizing its incredible sound and value.
Neutral: @407jlew, the seller, welcomes bidders and viewers and responds to various inquiries. They clarify that only the passenger pegs have been removed, while the passenger seat is still on the bike. The seller also mentions that included parts include forward foot controls that were not installed, and provides insight into the bike's handling, indicating there are no issues with the lowered suspension based on the nature of Florida roads. Furthermore, @E-TypeOTS inquires about a toggle switch, which @407jlew explains is for the manual control of the radiator fan.
Negative: Commenters have expressed concerns regarding safety, specifically mentioning the removal of front turn signals as potentially dangerous in traffic, according to @3H0nda0rphans. This concern regarding visibility and signaling may hint at a negative aspect of the bike's modifications. Additionally, @pessia humorously remarks about making a cold start video with a painful incident involving the exhaust pipes, indirectly pointing towards the high-temperature output of the bike's system.
|
1996 Land Rover Otokar Defender 110 300Tdi 5-Speed Double-Cab Conversion
SALLDHHF8TF819592
Lot 200152
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Shawh praised the vehicle as a great example of a crew cab diesel, highlighting its great colors and nice equipment. @naynayxo described it as a beauty and a head-turner, expressing that the winner of the auction will have a special truck, wishing good luck to the seller. @NovaTiger also shared praise, stating the truck is absolutely beautiful in person and recognizing the level of quality associated with such listings, indicating they would continue to follow the auction despite potential financial constraints.
Neutral: @rsinger (The Seller) mentioned that the vehicle has been well maintained and provided additional detailed photos and videos of the truck as requested. The seller also answered potential buyers' inquiries regarding the condition of the engine and its top speed. There was also discussion about the vehicle's history and previous owner, with the seller providing information about purchasing it from a dealer in Florida, named Dream Classics.
Negative: Some users raised concerns and questions about the truck's capabilities and performance. @Kjburke1 inquired about the engine rebuild and top speed, while @Rich1DDS questioned whether the four cylinders could cruise comfortably at highway speeds. @WAGONBOYTD mentioned that many Americans might struggle to effectively operate the TDI transmission and suggested that with the right technique, the truck should be able to cruise comfortably at 70 mph.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: There were several enthusiastic comments about the vehicle, highlighting its appeal and the seller's care for it. @Northcarolinian expressed excitement about the auction and wished the seller good luck. @HemiEddie426 praised the DB9 as a tremendous grand tourer, particularly enjoying the experience with the top down and a manual gearbox. @jasun2100 shared their positive experience after purchasing the same vehicle model, noting its engaging drive and the value of manual transmissions in Aston Martins. Overall, many commenters appreciated the aesthetics and performance attributes of the DB9, particularly its rarity due to the limited number of manual Volantes produced.
Neutral: The seller, @GarySch, provided detailed responses to inquiries about the condition and specifications of the car. He explained that the vehicle's engine size is a common point of confusion as manufacturers often round up for marketing purposes. He transparently addressed concerns raised by @DC_MotorWerks regarding potential scratches from the lift arm and described the overall condition of the dash as well-preserved. Gary also mentioned the car’s regular maintenance history and his previous positive experience with sales on BaT, indicating he is genuinely engaged in finding a good buyer for the DB9.
Negative: However, there were some concerns raised about the vehicle's condition. @DC_MotorWerks pointed out an issue with the lift arm that appeared to damage the side skirt of the vehicle, which prompted a thoughtful response from the seller acknowledging the problem and providing updated photos. Furthermore, minor flaws such as a couple of scratches on the car were disclosed by @GarySch, which may cause potential buyers to reconsider. Overall, while the seller tried to be transparent about the vehicle's imperfections, these issues might raise doubts for some prospective bidders.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @gmagno expresses enthusiasm for the truck, mentioning that they own several themselves. @a990dna describes it as a very nice Ford F-250 Trailer Special, while @BigSpanner compliments its patriotic red, white, and blue color scheme, noting its appropriateness for July 4. @Chickenrig refers to it as a sweet-looking ride and wishes the seller good luck with the sale. @Baneyw agrees on the color, indicating its fitting nature for a bicentennial truck, and @3or4speed highlights its good looks, referencing a subtle adaptation of a previous model's design. @JR2003 praises the truck's aesthetics and condition, reminiscing about a similar vehicle owned by their father.
Neutral: RestorationStation (The Seller) provides detailed information about the truck's specifications, confirming that both gas tanks and their gauges work correctly, as well as mentioning the specifics of the vehicle's fuel system, which includes a protective factory-installed shield. The seller clarifies the truck's wheelbase and bed length in response to inquiries from @PetesPonies and @leesnap, and also discusses its towing capacity and the capability of its air conditioning system, emphasizing that it functions well in high temperatures. @VADreamer raises questions about towing capacity and tire age, which the seller addresses, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the vehicle's performance and reliability.
Negative: There are few negative comments regarding the truck. However, @PetesPonies points out a discrepancy regarding its classification as a short wheelbase model, indicating that despite the small bed, it uses the full frame. @VADreamer and the seller both comment on the dramatic increase in towing capacities in newer models, hinting at a comparison that could reflect negatively on older vehicles, suggesting that the trend may be a bit excessive. Additionally, while the seller lists the truck's overall good condition and clean state, a mention of two dents on the driver's side inner wheel well could imply some imperfections in an otherwise well-maintained vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @CodyStang expressed that the truck is a good deal for its price, indicating that initial impressions are favorable. @cbrown13, the seller, provided reassurance about the truck's features, confirming that they have since installed seatbelts, which addresses potential buyers' concerns. Additionally, the seller is actively engaging with inquiries, such as providing a cold start video, enhancing the transparency and trust regarding the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Comments from other users like @jorddaniel inquired about the presence of seatbelts and the seller's response clarified that the vehicle had been updated with this important safety feature after initial inquiries. @Bobzluvsoldcars requested further visual evidence through videos, and the seller promptly responded by sharing a cold start video, contributing to a dialogue that maintains interest in the vehicle without showing explicit enthusiasm or disappointment.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the truck from users. The communication has primarily revolved around clarifications and requests for additional visuals and information, with no criticisms or complaints identified.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @dustysombrero shared that they had an exceptional experience purchasing a Cayenne Diesel from @genevamotorcars, praising the condition of the car and the professionalism of the transaction. Many commenters seem to express trust in the reliability of the vehicle, particularly noting the reputation of @genevamotorcars for handling these models well. @genevamotorcars assured that the 3.0 Audi Diesels are among the most reliable diesels available and confirmed that there are no issues with the EGR or DPF systems, further instilling confidence in potential buyers.
Neutral: Several questions were raised by potential buyers regarding the vehicle's repair history and features. @Habsfan inquired about repair costs for a previous front accident, while @choppercat and @racinrick24 asked for records regarding the overhaul of the EGR/Exhaust systems and specifics regarding brake pad depth and tire condition. There were also inquiries about the presence of specific features like lane change assist and requests for paint meter readings to assess the repair quality of a fender, showing that buyers are conducting due diligence before making a decision.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the lack of detailed information regarding the vehicle's accident history. @1972Dino246gts pointed out that Carfax does not classify the accident as minor, questioning the absence of repair records and the identity of the repair service. Additionally, @DocSoc and @LIVI noted potential issues like rust and upholstery burn marks, prompting further scrutiny from the community about the vehicle's condition. Overall, while much positive feedback exists, the negative comments highlight skepticism about transparency in the car’s history.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its remarkable history and condition. @7257scottt found it to be an amazing find, while @CarFoolLane marveled at the rarity of a 68-year-old car still with its original owner, calling it absolutely amazing. @gocorcoran mentioned the car's awesome bronze color and noted that how the original owner adds to its appeal, which @stugottz echoed, calling the original owner a 'cool cat' cruising around in the Bronze E Bird all these years. The beauty and uniqueness of the car also drew compliments from @Dollycat3, who praised its provenance and the interesting trade-in history, stating it was a 'beautiful and boss Bronze beauty.'
Neutral: Several comments provided additional information and context about the vehicle without expressing strong opinions. @dscottj431 pointed out that the use of tractor paper in car dealerships could be an interesting story, while @p-38 inquired about the work done on the driveline. @bobdog noted a minor detail about the car's louvers being installed upside down, but still expressed desire to own the car. @576168Birds raised a question about the vehicle having a Florida title with Texas plates, resulting in a clarifying response from @CarFoolLane, who explained the car's history. @ClassicCarMuseum (The Seller) addressed inquiries about the car's restoration and explained that the power seats are functioning well in response to @japashby.
Negative: A few comments pointed out concerns or issues relating to the vehicle. @bobdog's observation of the upside-down louvers detracted from his appreciation, suggesting it could be a simple fix but still noted it as a drawback. @576168Birds, while asking about the vehicle's title discrepancies, hinted at confusion regarding its registration. Additionally, the mention of the Texas plate being merely symbolic by @ClassicCarMuseum (The Seller) suggested there may be oversight or misinterpretation among the commenters, which could be seen as a lack of clarity regarding the vehicle's provenance.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments reflect positively on the vehicle's condition and service history, with @alGerman complimenting the car and asking about its maintenance. @Vettedmotors noted the wonderful service history, indicating it has been well-cared for. Additionally, @KiwiCuda mentioned that the vehicle would make a great complement to another car, suggesting it has appealing qualities that could attract buyers.
Neutral: Inquiries about the vehicle's location and availability for viewing came from @sirMaz, who is interested in seeing the car in person. @stanela, the seller, provided the necessary contact information and was accommodating towards potential buyers. There was discussion about the Mercedes model specifics, such as exhaust configurations, showcasing an interest in the technical aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: No significantly negative comments were present in the feedback regarding the vehicle. Most discussions revolved around the vehicle's attributes or potential modifications, with @Duncan_same_old noting the differences in exhaust setups but not expressing dissatisfaction. Overall, there were no major complaints or red flags raised in the comments.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @UncleBaldy expresses enthusiasm for the cup holder location, highlighting an appealing feature of the vehicle. @boaboyoz praises the color scheme of the truck, noting it as a 'killer K20' and calling the build fanbloodytastic. @kshaw shares excitement, stating that if they could build their ideal truck, this would perfectly fit their vision. @Beans_Bacon also chimes in, calling the K20 a 'rockin' vehicle and expressing patriotic pride.
Neutral: @BULLITT65 raises a question regarding whether the truck is a factory short bed or converted from a long bed, indicating a curiosity about its history. @belotface asks for specific measurements of the truck, which suggests practical plans for parking it in a garage. @Brettly is interested in the mileage of the powertrain and whether it was newly installed or taken from another vehicle, seeking more information about the vehicle's specifics.
Negative: @fyrefast lists three aspects they would prefer to see changed, including the wheels and color details, which indicates dissatisfaction with certain features. @Eatinsteaks questions whether the bed is cut, showing concern about how that might affect the truck's value. @ReedBooth points out that the truck was initially a six-cylinder model with rarity in the short bed configuration, implying potential concerns about its modifications and authenticity.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the C63, highlighting it as a remarkable vehicle and a standout in the automotive world. @GDogg calls it a "remarkable C63," while @Bullitt68 emphasizes how fun and reliable the model is, referring to it as a "BADASS screamer". Several users, including @spyboy and @GeneG, share positive driving experiences, with @spyboy noting the joy of driving a low-mileage example and @GeneG reflecting fondly on his own C63, calling it one of his favorite cars after 75 vehicles owned. Overall, the consensus among many commenters is that the C63 is an exhilarating and well-loved car.
Neutral: Several comments provide technical insights and inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and service history. @lamborghini inquires about the presence of a limited-slip differential, while @Yags asks for the window sticker and service receipts. The seller, @MC626, answers some questions, clarifying the absence of a limited-slip differential and sharing that there are no known head bolt updates completed on the vehicle. Commenters like @pauliefein further elaborate on the reputation of the C63's engine, indicating that while concerns about head bolts exist, many agree that these worries might be overstated as long as regular maintenance is performed.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the car's condition and potential issues. @mromani highlights that the vehicle lacks updated head bolts, which could lead to future problems, alongside mentioning other common issues such as intake manifold gasket leaks and worn out engine mounts. @rickydean69 expresses skepticism regarding the sale price, guessing that it will not reach the expected reserve. Additionally, other users stress their disbelief at the low mileage of the car, emphasizing a desire for more driving enjoyment rather than letting such a vehicle sit idle. This mixture of caution regarding potential future repairs and the skepticism about pricing reflects a level of reservation among some commenters.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @GDogg describes the C2 Cabriolet as absolutely sensational, highlighting its appeal. @WPOEBO appreciates the car's beauty and suggests the addition of videos to showcase its features like top operation and driving experience. @BurningDinos finds the color combination stunning and praises an accompanying drive video for its relaxed nature, noting the skilled driving.
Neutral: @GLWTA,PNinSF raises an interesting point about the unusual distribution of mileage on the car, highlighting a potential story behind its limited use after being leased. @JAug inquires about the car's availability for in-person viewing, while @barnhouse60 provides details about the special order color of the vehicle, noting the nuances between similar interior colors. @haaski requests service history records for the car, emphasizing the importance of documentation in assessing its condition.
Negative: @Pbaron88 appears concerned about the functioning of the rear spoiler, noting it seemed improperly positioned in videos. @kk3249 asks for paint meter readings, indicating potential concerns regarding the car's exterior condition. Overall, some comments reflect skepticism about certain features, prompting further clarification from the seller.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Commenters expressed a favorable view of the vehicle, highlighting its potential. @Siowner noted that the new engine appeared to be well-installed and suggested it could be a great project for performance upgrades. @Lalorivas mentioned that the engine is very strong and runs smoothly, with no oil leaks and recently being tuned up, emphasizing its reliability. @Rumbling endorsed the car's suitability as a daily driver, and @Lalorivas concurred, sharing his personal experience with other VW models, reinforcing the notion that this '69 Beetle is dependable and enjoyable to drive.
Neutral: There were some neutral comments regarding the vehicle's condition and potential for improvement. @JustPeachy inquired about any mechanical issues beyond the noted grinding in 3rd gear. In response, @Lalorivas assured them there were no oil leaks and communicated that the car was recently tuned up and running great. @CLTLarry added a lighthearted comment about a humorous decoration idea for the vehicle, which reflected a quirky view on personalization rather than any specific critiques.
Negative: A slight concern was raised regarding the vehicle's mechanical performance. @JustPeachy’s comment about the grinding in 3rd gear indicated that there might be issues to investigate further, albeit @Lalorivas was quick to negate serious concerns about the car's overall mechanical condition. While the comments were mostly positive, the mention of potential grinding suggests that some buyers might want to consider a thorough check-up before finalizing a purchase.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters express enthusiasm for the 1971 Datsun 240Z, highlighting its appeal as a classic vehicle. @jagster911 describes it as a 'nice old car' that just needs fuel and oil to enjoy driving, suggesting it's a fun everyday car. Meanwhile, @Oldhockyplayr fondly recalls their driving experience in a similar model, emphasizing its exotic appearance, enjoyable driving characteristics, and low maintenance needs. Comments from @Geckos_Rule echo this sentiment, conveying optimism regarding the potential restoration of this car, especially with available aftermarket parts.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's condition and specifications reveal a mix of curiosity and caution. @Cali240z notes that the car appears to have sustained rear damage earlier in its life but still considers it solid for its type. @Kenlaroe requests better photographs of the vehicle's undercarriage, indicating a desire for a closer inspection before considering a purchase. The Seller, @KOOK, responds to queries with transparency, providing additional context about the vehicle's history, such as a prior rear-end collision and assurance of its unrestored status.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns about the extent of restoration needed for the vehicle. @Petedcis emphasizes that this car will require a significant restoration effort and @RichardZ04390 warns it may require a complete teardown despite its low VIN. @Happy4Life and others also stress the need for extensive care and restoration, reflecting a general consensus that, while the vehicle holds potential, it comes with challenges that prospective owners must be prepared to address.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments highlight the exceptional nature of the 2013 Boss 302 LS offered by @Shelbyguy1 (The Seller). Many enthusiasts, including @1NiceBoss, commend @Shelbyguy1 for his extensive knowledge and attention to detail when it comes to these LS cars. Potential buyers express a strong sense of confidence in the purchase from @Shelbyguy1, indicating that owning a SBY Boss 302 LS will be a source of pride and enjoyment. There are key mentions of the car's low mileage and the included original Ford parts that enhance its appeal, making it a highly desirable vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @PP0001, confirm the production numbers provided by @Shelbyguy1, which lends credibility to the listing. They discuss the various features that come with the car, such as the specific parts included and their originality. There are also discussions about tire recommendations for LS owners, indicating a community of enthusiasts sharing practical advice and options. This neutral exchange of information highlights the collective knowledge among Boss 302 owners and the camaraderie within the group.
Negative: A few minor concerns are raised, such as the mention of very small road chips on the vehicle, which is common for a car driven 8000 miles but may detract from its overall pristine appearance. There are questions regarding the need to replace older tires, especially with some owners prioritizing the integrity and safety of the vehicle over original components. While there are no major criticisms about the car itself, the discussion reflects a cautious approach from buyers who wish to ensure their investment is sound and well-maintained.
|
2021 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 2500 Midwest Automotive Designs Luxe Cruiser
W1X4EBHY9MP429384
Lot 200057
Dealer
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Gregpryckman praises the quality of the Midwest Van, noting that he bought a longer version from BaT and found it to be superb with excellent support from the manufacturer. He highlights that these trucks are beautifully built, appreciating the design and reliability. @RWW2 contributes by mentioning that the sofas can be converted into sleeper beds, a feature that could be appealing to potential buyers looking for versatility in accommodations. The seller, @PricePro, provides useful images, including one that shows the bed laid flat, which helps in understanding the vehicle's sleeping arrangements.
Neutral: Several commenters express questions regarding specifics of the vehicle's features. @dhitchfl inquires if the spec sheet in photo 79 pertains to this vehicle and points out the need for more details like manuals from the manufacturer and cold start videos. @pgreene asks for the original window sticker, ownership history, and dimensions of the fold-out bed, showcasing a thorough interest in the vehicle's provenance and specifications. @casprop asks if the vehicle includes a generator and mentions that the spec sheet indicates it may, sparking discussions on the presence of various amenities.
Negative: Some comments reflect frustration and concerns about the vehicle's features. @GaryAH directly questions the absence of an Onan generator, solar, cooktop, spare tire, and propane, raising red flags about the vehicle's preparedness for travel. @dhitchfl shows irritation with the seller's delayed responses to auction watchers, suggesting a lack of communication. Additionally, there are inquiries about if all original manuals are available, which could indicate potential buyers' worries about the vehicle's completeness and support.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Chamba noted the vehicle's full floater rear axle as a unique feature for a UAE model, calling it a 'cool perk.' Additionally, @MideastClassicsLLC (The Seller) updated the listing to indicate that the seats have been re-foamed, which may enhance the comfort and appeal for potential buyers.
Neutral: @JoeS-12 appreciated the partial passenger footwell picture but pointed out the absence of the driver's side image, expressing a desire for more specific details. @Chamba also requested additional close-up pictures of the seam between the cowl vent and the windscreen A pillar shelf to address particular concerns, indicating an interest in thorough documentation before purchase.
Negative: @MideastClassicsLLC (The Seller) mentioned that the vehicle's inspection was rejected due to the absence of a catalytic converter, which raises potential compliance issues. @Mario_L. expressed concerns over the vehicle's high mileage and inquired about any documentation concerning mechanical work, while also seeking clarity on what parts might require attention, highlighting an uncertainty regarding its overall condition. The seller's response clarified that no major mechanical work had been conducted, which may deter potential buyers looking for a well-maintained vehicle.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @Scliffe finds the vehicle visually appealing and is excited to make a bid on it, acknowledging its uniqueness compared to other options like the Rolls pickup. @garymcal confirms that it is indeed an attention-getter, sharing personal experiences of driving it to South Carolina with no issues. @Cmoetrucks compliments the attractive appearance of the truck, expressing positive sentiments about its overall design and color. @Dave_Car_Guy appreciates the custom color choice, comparing it favorably to iconic car shades and recognizing its distinctiveness in the market.
Neutral: A few comments focus on seeking clarification about the truck's specifications. @gots2jump asks about the ride height, while others inquire whether various aspects like the transmission and suspension are original. @garymcal responds to these inquiries, confirming that the ride height is stock and providing details about the 5-speed transmission installed. There are discussions regarding the truck's utility, including one comment by @F1001956 about its highway reliability, to which @garymcal reassures potential buyers of its capability on longer drives.
Negative: Several comments express confusion and concerns over inconsistencies in the listing and the seller's descriptions. @PED raises multiple questions about the truck's components, particularly regarding the suspension and braking systems, suggesting that the provided information lacks clarity. Others, like @TheRealGrifN, point out potential contradictions in the seller's claims about the front suspension. There are also concerns about the terminology used by the seller, with some feeling that it could negatively affect the auction outcome due to ambiguity.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @rrstl3 expresses satisfaction with the 2018 F Type R, highlighting its beauty and the appealing carbon ceramic brakes. @Supergoat notes the impressive ability of the car to maintain its aesthetic appeal even at high mileage. @Overextended shares a very favorable perspective, describing the vehicle as the most underrated car on the market, with great driving experience, reliability, and high power, supported by @CoopCity's inquiry into their ownership experience of the same car. The seller, @FirehouseVintage, also welcomes bidders and mentions significant upgrades and maintenance completed on the vehicle to enhance its appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters, like @Scliffe and @BlueCar2013, express a mix of intrigue and skepticism regarding the vehicle's auction, especially about its mileage and reported collisions. @Rgilbert100 asks for insights on the brake condition, which @FirehouseVintage soon addresses by confirming recent rotor and pad replacements. Additionally, @Lokoseena mentions the possibility of acquiring parts affordably if replacements are needed and raises a question about the coolant Y-pipe, which has been replaced by the seller. @jeepdj inquires about potential issues known from older models of V8s, indicating a shared concern among potential buyers about common maintenance requirements.
Negative: @Lokoseena raises concerns about the reported collisions on the Carfax, suggesting skepticism about the car's history. @RoadsideRC lists common issues often faced by the car and expresses curiosity about their current state, implying uncertainty about the vehicle's reliability. @bossZ questions the functionality of the parking assist sensors, indicating potential previous damage's effect on the vehicle's components, and reflects worry over the impact of past incidents on its long-term usability. Overall, there's a clear thread of wariness among some participants regarding the car's history and technical conditions.
|
6k-Mile 1996 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport Convertible 6-Speed
1G1YY3252T5600458
Lot 200060
Private Party
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: The comments regarding the vehicle reflect a strong appreciation for its beauty and rarity. @BitontoAutos admires the stunning red interior and white top, highlighting the vehicle's allure. @slandry002 emphasizes the uniqueness of this particular model, noting it's one of only 53 GS convertibles with a Torch Red interior, underlining its desirability compared to other models. Additionally, @Drisler, @1974pantera, and @collectionrotation express awe at the vehicle, indicating it is breathtaking and awesome, with @Curvette1 praising it as a perfect representation of America's sports car. The seller, @Daemon606, is acknowledged for managing an incredible vehicle and providing detailed documentation and history with the car, fostering a sense of trust among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments offer insightful perspectives on the model's specifications and rarity, without overtly positive or negative sentiments. @slandry002 provides detailed statistics on the manufacturing numbers of the GS vehicles, contributing to a deeper understanding of its collectibility. @C822 inquires about original key fobs, suggesting interest in authenticity and completeness. The seller, @Daemon606, responds to various questions, highlighting the well-maintained condition of the car and the extensive service history it has, reassuring potential buyers of its quality and upkeep.
Negative: While the overall sentiment is positive, there are hints of potential concerns within some comments. @Richard17 expresses a desire to drive the car despite knowing he shouldn’t, implying a tension between maintaining its pristine condition and enjoying its performance. Furthermore, @Icecreammatt mentions that while certain features like the FX3 suspension were interesting, they were also problematic, hinting at possible mechanical concerns. Nonetheless, these reservations do not overshadow the overall appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic and historical significance.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @dcast2 expressed excitement, calling it a "once in a lifetime truck right before our eyes." @mr.russky recommended it as a great base for a flatbed camper, while @77az added that it is an "awesome" vehicle. @banjo5 was equally impressed, labeling the truck as "just nuts" and amazing. @Discobob praised its simplicity and versatility, noting that there are many possibilities with the flatbed. Overall, these comments convey a strong sense of admiration for the truck's capabilities and potential.
Neutral: @4byFreak (The Seller) provided detailed information about the truck's history, including its previous ownership and mechanical condition. They clarified the reasons behind the missing Power Stroke badges and addressed concerns about the truck's condition, emphasizing its mechanical solidity and the care taken in repainting. Further, the seller highlighted the truck's clean interior and lack of sun damage, making it a presentable vehicle ready for work. @fordde asked about the bed length, and @Razorback3417 inquired about the rear axle ratio, indicating a genuine interest in specifications.
Negative: @Wildland351 raised concerns regarding the Power Stroke badges, questioning the alterations made to the truck's appearance. @drtino wanted to know about potential rust issues before the repainting, as rust could compromise the vehicle's integrity. Additionally, @yankstrap asked for a picture of the transmission ID tag, hinting at possible doubts about the truck's original specifications. Despite the prevailing positive comments, these concerns indicate that some potential bidders remain cautious about certain aspects of the truck's condition and history.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @ClownShoeCrazy mentioned how dandy the vehicle looks, highlighting its appeal. @NateFox reminisced about fun experiences with the car, sharing a memory of turning a corner on two wheels. @RWB_AZ humorously likened it to a unique blend of a Samurai and a LeBaron convertible, emphasizing its quirky 80s charm. @Blizzard340 shared their positive experiences with similar models, expressing enthusiasm for a potential new model release in the USA. @likestodrive found the listing amusing, while @m2711c noted the vehicle's sharp appearance. @Spotpea positively remarked on its distinctive look, while @bendog praised it as a clean example of a rare vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @thedude2, provided informative comments about the car, noting that the radio works but the tape player does not. They explained that the Samurai has heat but no air conditioning, and addressed a question about the car's history, stating it spent its life in the U.S. and had minimal mileage over the years. They also clarified about the gear shifter and its condition, stating it shifts like new. @Waynemarci's inquiries about the stock status of the wood panels led to further explanations, with @thedude2 confirming that the wood panels were indeed stock for that model year.
Negative: Some commenters expressed criticism, with @beakyboy36 questioning the vehicle's design choices. @Babyp made various humorous remarks that conveyed a negative view, referring to the car as 'Ugleeey' and comparing it to a spoon. @ZAutobahn's comment about the car's time in the Philippines seemed to suggest skepticism about its authenticity, while @Insseeme's comment was vague and critical. Overall, while there was a mix of amusement and nostalgia, there were also clear doubts about the vehicle's aesthetics and history.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting its striking design and personal connections to the 2CV model. @snafuracer reminisces about their father's red and white Dolly, asserting that these are among the best-looking 2CVs. @RBBGroup simply calls it the most fun per cubic centimeter, appreciating the car's fun nature. @JamesB007 also compliments the vehicle's beauty and presentation, indicating that it was likely restored by a reputable company, which adds to its charm.
Neutral: Comments highlight various logistical concerns surrounding the car's registration in California. @WEM inquires about the car's registration status, and @Hoepper questions the possibility of registering it given the 1985 model year. The seller, @ElisMotorcars, clarifies that the car cannot be registered in California due to smog regulations, promising an update after they attempt to verify its compliance. Some commenters, like @ianm07, share insights that could allow for easier registration in other states such as Arizona, where historic vehicles might be exempt from smog checks.
Negative: On the downside, several commenters raise concerns about the car's potential registration issues and its condition. @srallen, @johnnyvett, and @citroenID all emphasize the complexities of registration for a 1985 model, highlighting the need for compliance with state-specific smog laws and potential costs associated with certification. Moreover, @citroenID points out possible past repairs around the taillights, suggesting that there may have been issues that need addressing, raising concerns about the vehicle's true condition upon closer examination.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @RidleysRides praises the 1984 Yamaha RZ350 as an exceptional example of a great bike. @jeeprt comments positively about their experience with @Tom_S, noting that the bike looks even better in person compared to the auction description. Additionally, @folmonty describes the vehicle as a "cream puff" and mentions its stock exhaust, commending @Tom_S for presenting it well. @Car4081 appreciates the bike's appearance, especially pointing out details about the exhaust system, which were corrected in the listing.
Neutral: @Tom_S highlights the bike's condition, noting that it is all stock, unmodified, and very clean with good finishes. He emphasizes the transparency of the auction process, stating that potential buyers should be confident in the description of the motorcycle and encourages them to inspect the bike in person if possible. There are some minor cosmetic issues mentioned, like a small chip on the front fender, but overall, the seller assures interested bidders about the vehicle's operational status and the inclusion of maintenance documentation.
Negative: @03redrocket questions whether the seller has conducted any leak down or compression tests on the motorcycle, expressing concern due to a previous bad experience with a similar bike. Although @Tom_S reassures them about the bike's performance, buyers still may see this lack of formal testing as a red flag. Additionally, @Car4081's confusion regarding the exhaust description suggests some inconsistencies in the auction listing that might create uncertainty about the accuracy of the details provided.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting it as a stunning example of a classic motorcycle. @Ant5842 praises the bike's aesthetic, calling it a beauty, while @sbmaine notes it as a perfect survivor, hoping it finds a good home. @lucky6600 emphasizes its potential for longevity with proper maintenance, and @sfmclean describes it as a genuine low mileage survivor in excellent condition, giving potential bidders confidence in the vehicle's quality. @DucMotorradNYC compliments the seller and the bike, affirming that minor inconsistencies do not detract from its overall allure as a low mileage classic.
Neutral: Some comments delve into technical details and the bike's specifications, revealing a variety of perspectives on the vehicle's history. @ChipW discusses the model year discrepancies, noting the bike's manufacturing inconsistencies and offering insights on parts used. Other commenters inquire about specific features, like mileage and suspension work. @Lisboa raises questions about the fork gaiters, while @rbikerescue and @Kidaster share their own experiences with similar models encouraging healthy discussions about the vehicle's condition and modifications.
Negative: A few commenters voice concerns regarding the bike's authenticity, particularly in terms of paint and design details. @Rjpiepe notes that the blue color might not align with the bike's production date, suggesting a possibility of non-original paintwork. @StaffordRestorations and @ChipW discuss inconsistencies in pinstripe finishes, raising questions about their originality. These observations indicate that while the motorcycle is appealing, there are considerations potential buyers should weigh regarding its historical accuracy and details.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @lonestargrit (The Seller) expresses excitement about their 1974 Ford F-100 Custom Explorer Special, highlighting it as a dependable driver with character. They appreciate the compliments received while driving it and mention its distinctive appearance from the factory Explorer Special package. The seller emphasizes the truck's well-documented service history, detailing various recent maintenance and upgrades, including a rebuilt transmission, new carburetor, and improved fuel system, making it a fun vehicle to enjoy on the road.
Neutral: Comments from @bulldogfront and @AlbertaBoy show general admiration for the truck's appeal and historical connection to their own experiences with similar vehicles. Inquiries from @Cougarxr71970 and @WIZZZZ suggest interest in specific mechanical aspects and the condition of certain features, such as the electric fuel pump and rust issues. A friendly dialogue takes place, with @lonestargrit willing to provide further information and sharing a video depicting the truck's daily driving behavior.
Negative: While the majority of comments are positive or neutral, there are concerns raised regarding the truck's rust in the cab floor and specifics about its bed condition, noted by @WIZZZZ. The seller acknowledges the known rust issues and expresses uncertainty regarding the extent of hidden damage, indicating a need for potential additional repairs. Although these concerns are addressed, they may deter some potential buyers looking for a pristine example.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @AutobarnCollection (The Seller) expresses pride in offering a low-mileage CLK55 AMG Cabriolet, describing it as a performance monster and encouraging potential buyers to reach out with inquiries. @fish2556, who has a longstanding relationship with this vehicle, shares a positive history, underscoring the accuracy of the car's mileage and its reliable condition. @carenthusiast2020 contributes to the sentiments by noting the rarity and special nature of the car, highlighting its engineering quality from a bygone era and emphasizing his personal attachment to such vehicles.
Neutral: Multiple commenters, including @GTO400fourspeed, draw attention to the overall condition of the vehicle, asking for additional photographs to evaluate its state, with acknowledgment that the seller has since provided these. The seller clarifies that the specific details in the photos were affected by how they were taken, mentioning that there are minor paint chips on the driver's side due to external factors. There is also discussion about supercharger options for those interested in upgrading the vehicle's performance, with @GTO400fourspeed inviting advice from the community.
Negative: @GTO400fourspeed raises a concern about missing trunk deck badges, prompting an explanation from @auctionroute that the vehicle was ordered with a 'badge delete' option. The seller, @AutobarnCollection, confirms this and offers reassurance that badges can be found in the aftermarket, addressing the concern. However, the need for clarification regarding the presence of badges may indicate a level of scrutiny about the vehicle's detailing and originality.
|
RUF RCT Evo-Specification 1990 Porsche 911 Carrera 2 Coupe 5-Speed
WP0AB2969LS451504
Lot 200000
Dealer
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Multiple commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, celebrating it as a remarkable milestone as Lot #200,000 on Bring a Trailer. @silverarrowcarsltd (The Seller) proudly highlighted the vehicle's improvements over the stock model, noting its stunning visuals and superior handling, which is further endorsed by comments from @bbmac, who called it the "nicest 911 I have ever seen." Enthusiasts like @GDogg confirmed the superb craftsmanship, while @RUFCanada emphasized the meticulous engineering process behind the RUF conversions, making it clear that they produce vehicles meant for longevity and performance.
Neutral: Several comments provided factual insights regarding the car's technical specifications and the auction dynamics. @kostasd shared a bittersweet perspective on the vehicle's modifications, recognizing the appeal but lamenting the loss of originality. @ninja_van1sh raised a practical question about registering the vehicle in California, which was addressed by @silverarrowcarsltd, indicating ongoing efforts to meet emissions requirements. Others like @spartansix and @Dandan401 discussed the bidding patterns and anticipated final prices, showcasing a mix of speculation and genuine interest in the auction process.
Negative: There were some concerns expressed about the modifications made to the vehicle, with @kostasd and @Vysock_guy questioning the vehicle's authenticity as a true RUF conversion. @quickmx5 criticized aspects of the car's interior, suggesting it featured an aftermarket stereo that detracted from its value. Additionally, @Vysock_guy pointed out potential discrepancies with the vehicle's components, which could confuse prospective buyers. The discussion showcased a divide between purists who preferred original designs and fans of the modified build.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Several commenters praised the 599 GTB, highlighting its graceful aging, stunning aesthetics, and overall desirability. @Stealthssfc mentioned that he prefers the car now compared to its original release, while @TeslaJames called the car gorgeous and noted its production rarity. @oldwood and @HelpMeHelpU echoed these sentiments, with @oldwood emphasizing his love for his own 599 GTB and @HelpMeHelpU expressing excitement about the car's presentation and market interest. The seller, @silverarrowcarsltd, also shared positive details regarding the car's compliance, features, and service history, reinforcing the car's value and appeal.
Neutral: A few comments touched on practical details regarding the car's specifications and keywords. @katA-Tonic raised a question about Canadian market cars typically having speedometers in kilometers, while @johnnyb11 and @waltscars noted how the car looks better in person, appreciating its design elements. The seller responded to various inquiries about the car’s compliance status and service details, indicating that the vehicle has been modified to meet U.S. standards and is being prepared for sale without reserve. @ArizonaFuzz sought clarification about the conversion of the odometer from kilometers to miles, which highlights a potential concern about documentation, but the seller provided thorough responses.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concern about practical issues related to the vehicle's registration and emissions compliance. @butthead questioned whether the Canadian vehicle could pass California smog tests, while @ajnz raised doubts about missing federal safety labels that would complicate registration. @dino70089 echoed this concern about the car being considered out-of-state due to its Washington title, which could affect the smog inspection process required in California. These comments demonstrate a cautious perspective among potential buyers regarding the regulatory hurdles that could arise during the purchase and registration process.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Comments regarding the vehicle praise its aesthetic appearance, particularly its bright color. @11budlite noted that it is a nice-looking Caterham in a great color, expressing good wishes for the sale. @Trw92a (The Seller) addressed complaints about the exhaust positioning, confirming that adjustments were made to achieve a better alignment, leading to a positive reception from commenters like @1Cobra1 who complimented the seller on the repair. Many also appreciate the appeal of the vehicle's classic driving experience, with @Duke_Audi mentioning that the car offers a 'BIG grin' for drivers, highlighting it as a fun and engaging option for enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters requested clarifications regarding the vehicle's specifications and condition. @Croc inquired about the emissions inspection required for the vehicle's registration in New Jersey, while @dougbau asked for documentation regarding previous repairs. The Seller, @Trw92a, provided responses addressing the VIN issues raised by @Duke_Audi, clarifying titles and registrations. Meanwhile, others discussed features like the missing heater, with @TomPayne humorously suggesting a different vehicle for colder weather. Comments about the vehicle's tire sizes and configurations were also shared by various users, with some noting the difference in tire specifications and suggesting changes based on personal experiences with the Caterham.
Negative: Some negative feedback has been directed towards the vehicle's features and presentation. @Duke_Audi raised concerns about discrepancies between the advertisement and the actual vehicle, particularly regarding the door types and mentions of a removable front bumper. Other users, like @danbrown100, pointed out potential exhaust configuration issues, suggesting that it was installed incorrectly. @Jeb05420 expressed concerns about the rear wheel gap being larger than typical for other Caterham models. Overall, these comments suggest a need for further clarification and detail, highlighting inconsistencies that could impact a potential buyer’s decision.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's exceptional build quality, emphasizing its close resemblance to the original Cobras, particularly those constructed by @Dave Wagner. @LHC notes that Wagner's Cobras closely mirror the originals without rattling as much, a sentiment echoed by others. @nkb highlights the accuracy of the original details in this Continuation Cobra, praising its rare aluminum body and several correct original components. @amirhtlusa expresses excitement over the car's classic princess blue color, while @BESCFAN describes it as 'nice,' showing a consensus that the car's aesthetic and craftsmanship stand out in the market. Enthusiasts feel this vehicle is not only stunning but also represents a significant accomplishment in the continuation car landscape, with many stating it could be "the best original-looking copy ever."
Neutral: Some comments reflect curiosity about the vehicle's specifications and history. @Endo911rs points out the car's limited mileage, while @surfer55 expresses curiosity about the body manufacturer, mentioning possible links to @Kirkham. Questions arise from various posters regarding the vehicle's drivetrain, asking about the specifics of the carburetor and transmission. @WSBY and @surfer55 aim to clarify the engine block's year and lineage, indicating a need for more information about its origins. The discussions also highlight differentiation between "original" and "continuation" Cobras, showcasing the complexity of terminology in the community and how they align with the car's value and classification.
Negative: Despite overall positive feelings, a few commenters express skepticism about the vehicle's authenticity and craftsmanship. @SBCARGUY warns that while continuation cars are excellent, they do not exactly replicate the original Cobras. @Flunder908 questions the inaccuracies regarding tags and components, suggesting that certain aspects could be improved for greater authenticity. @Rikkimig states that if it wasn’t built in the 60s, it doesn’t qualify as "real," hinting at a divide in opinion regarding what constitutes a legitimate Cobra. Additionally, @turbodickie and @SDSprint share concerns about specific details that are noted to be incorrect, such as the clock not working, which some buyers may find off-putting. These critiques expose a level of scrutiny that exists within the passionate community surrounding Cobra ownership.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its pristine condition and unique specifications. @boaboyoz praised the glorious Giallo Modena color, and @56PackardMan noted the excitement of a manual transmission, reminiscing about the joy of three pedals. The seller, @Symbolic_International, reassured interested buyers that the car had undergone comprehensive inspections and updates costing over $21K, making it mechanically sound with minimal cosmetic issues. Overall, there's a sense of enthusiasm and appreciation for this model among commentors.
Neutral: Several individuals inquired about the car's history and details, including @Kishote, who wanted to know if the car had been listed previously on BaT. @ram_g provided useful insights about tracing a vehicle's history through its VIN on classic.com, sparking a discussion on the vehicle's registration timeline. The seller clarified these points and encouraged further inquiries, showcasing their commitment to transparency and customer service while sharing the excitement surrounding the auction process.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, there were some concerns raised by commenters. @RossoDoc cautioned against potential damage from loose stones during driving, hinting at a lack of protective film on the car. @ram_g also sought additional clarification about possible sticky surfaces and the condition of the leather interior, suggesting a need for more detailed photographic evidence. These inquiries reflect anxieties buyers may have regarding the car's long-term maintenance and condition despite its overall appealing presentation.
|
 |
COMMENT SUMMARY
Positive: @hsheeran expresses excitement about the SL600, indicating curiosity regarding its potential value as a genuine driver's vehicle compared to the garage-kept examples. @carstruck acknowledges the auction's interest and appreciates the vehicle's decent condition despite its mileage and ownership history. Observations from @carstruck suggest that the vehicle's upkeep, particularly regarding its chassis, has been commendable, further noted by @Rdubay911, who emphasizes the lack of abuse signs, indicating a well-maintained vehicle that has been lightly utilized.
Neutral: Responses from @Josefff and @jcollum68 reflect the desire for better clarity on the vehicle's maintenance history and cosmetic condition. @Jspaz (The Seller) provides details on the vehicle's service records and maintenance inquiries, particularly addressing past issues like the cylinder rebuild and vacuum leak. Overall, there is a mix of curiosity and requests for further information, particularly concerning the ADS and the car's aesthetic details, which are essential for potential bidders.
Negative: Concerns have been voiced by @ejnight, who pointed out the leaking ball joints, and @lionsfan54, who criticized the platform's lack of detailed maintenance records. These issues suggest that potential buyers may find it frustrating to ascertain the car's true condition and history. @Josefff mentions hesitance to bid, specifically regarding the expensive and complex repairs associated with the ADS system, underlining a significant barrier for some potential bidders.
|
|
|