Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning design and luxurious features. @jamessmithy conveyed excitement over the car's elegance, particularly mentioning its resemblance to the more powerful PIII. @peptic-tweed described it as a "stunning specimen," while @Tom_S. noted its impressive appearance with the top down. @berfinroy praised the model as possibly the best pre-war Rolls-Royce, emphasizing its powerful engine and refined design. @boaboyoz and @Dollycat3 echoed similar sentiments, marveling at the car's beauty and art deco styling, with @SwissMovement asserting that arriving in such a vehicle signifies prestige. Overall, there was a consensus that the Rolls-Royce is an exquisite piece of automotive art.
Neutral: Several comments provided useful insights into the vehicle's history and specifications, demonstrating a shared curiosity among commenters. @Mody was interested in inspecting the car in person, while @TomLaferriere (The Seller) confirmed that in-person inspections can be arranged. The dialogue among participants also included queries about the car's performance and historical context, with @Malibubimmer seeking information on its mileage since the Pebble Beach Concours, and @ScottNThompson contemplating valuation and insurance matters. Additionally, @commercial provided details regarding the radiator badge color, relating it to the car's historical accuracy. These discussions indicated a community of knowledgeable enthusiasts eager to learn more about the exquisite automobile.
Negative: Some comments brought up concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and regulatory compliance. @marktrailer questioned how the vehicle could meet modern safety standards in Ontario, specifically regarding absent features like window defrost and rearview mirrors. @scx867 mentioned the apparent misalignment of the rear light mountings, suggesting that such details could detract from the vehicle's overall presentation. @KenTillyUK agreed that while the front of the car is beautiful, its rear could be improved, reflecting a sentiment among some about the design's less favorable aspects. These critiques point to a recognition that even exceptional vehicles may not escape scrutiny.
 |
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the BMW Z8, highlighting its unique allure and history, especially given its former ownership by boxing legend George Foreman. @Dollycat3 praised its gorgeous appearance and rare provenance, while @GDogg humorously suggested naming the color Champ Blue, further reflecting how Foreman's identity adds to the car's charm. Others like @eddieames and @e9er expressed love for the car's aesthetic and drivetrain, emphasizing it as 'beautiful' and 'cool'. Overall, the sentiment is one of admiration for the Z8's striking design and the intriguing backstory that enhances its appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions regarding the car's history and condition, particularly concerning previous reports of damage from a fire at Foreman's facility. @Moepoe noted the inconsistency in the Carfax report regarding the car's damage history, which led to discussions about the reliability of such reports. @ActIII and @2112 inquired about various aspects of the car's current condition, indicating that despite the beautiful exterior, more attention might be needed in certain mechanical areas. @BB55 (The Seller) provided clarifications on repairs conducted, thus addressing many of the points raised by the community.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming positivity, concerns arose about the car's condition and maintenance history. @trizzuth pointed out significant discoloration and corrosion visible in various areas, questioning how such issues could have occurred on a vehicle with low mileage, raising doubts about its storage conditions. @Moepoe expressed skepticism about whether the damage underwent insurance claims or was understated, suggesting deceit regarding the car's true state. Overall, the comments reflect a cautious approach among some potential buyers, urging the need for thorough inspections to reassure about the vehicle's integrity.
|
 |
Positive: Several commentators praised the quality of the MGA, noting its impressive body structure and high-quality restoration. @tim_t highlighted that the car exhibits good panel fit and shows no signs of corrosion, indicating that it was restored with attention to detail. Commenters like @DaCon acknowledged the challenge of achieving such restoration quality on these classic vehicles, further emphasizing that this particular car is among the best they have seen.
Neutral: Many comments focused on the convertible top, with varying opinions on its fit and design. @Husky44 remarked that the top is only useful when parked in the rain, suggesting the enhancement lies in putting it down rather than worrying about window configurations. @LouFifer expressed curiosity about the top's origin and other features of the car, while @iwantane9 provided insights about the body number indicating the car's year of manufacture. These comments highlight a mix of appreciation for the car's aesthetics and technical queries regarding its specifications, adding depth to the discussion.
Negative: Conversely, some comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle. @jturner noted the rear end of the car appears to be sitting high, potentially indicating a suspension issue. @Classichondaman also pointed out that the rear suspension seems to be 'jacked up,' questioning whether incorrect components may have been used. Additionally, questions about the 'bonded' title raised by @robert27329 and inquiries into the engine's originality by @LouFifer reflect uncertainties that potential buyers might have, which could detract from the overall appeal of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning appearance and unique color. @jsilver212 remarked with excitement, while @nfurniss appreciated the potential for a manual conversion. @SonnyCrockett13 praised the first image of the car and @Stev-o pointed out the vibrant TDF Blue, calling it a fantastic choice. The seller, @ferrarifan10, shared the sentiment regarding this car's beauty, stating it holds significant sentimental value as it was his father's first new Ferrari. Other comments echoed this appreciation, with @RecoveringAtty calling TDF Blue the 'Holy Grail' Ferrari color and @EddieNap expressing love for the hue.
Neutral: Several users asked questions and sought clarifications about the vehicle, revealing a genuine interest in its history and condition. @itsjustme0770 inquired about the fender repaint, while @astuteinv wanted to know about the clutch wear reading. @M-gineer was interested in the type of exhaust, showing awareness of the value attached to such details. The seller responded warmly to these queries, explaining various aspects including the clutch's condition and the top's operation while assuring that the car was thoroughly sorted and de-stickied. Users expressed curiosity about practical elements like storage, maintenance, and features, indicating a thoughtful engagement with the car's history.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns regarding the car's condition and maintenance history. @Astonman76 pointed out potential fitment issues with the convertible top, suggesting it might not align properly with the rest of the car's condition. @sdmjake supported this view, suggesting that video evidence of the top operation would be beneficial. Additionally, @M458 expressed frustration with repeated requests for a gated manual transmission, implying that such comments detracted from the appreciation of the car's overall quality. These remarks indicate that while the vehicle is highly regarded, certain elements of its presentation and features have elicited skepticism among some viewers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly noting its beauty and historical significance. For instance, @Porsche1931 stated it would 'look great around town,' while @elihbrown referred to it as a 'beautiful bike.' @GLHatWFO wished the seller luck, calling it a 'beautiful example of two-wheel history.' Commenters like @stugottz and @H2R echoed similar sentiments, highlighting its rare and stunning qualities. The overwhelming consensus is that this Ace Four is an extraordinary piece of automotive art that captures the essence of its time, impressing both enthusiasts and casual observers alike.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the historical context and the unique auction structure of the bike. Commenters like @BabyD69 and @justpaul shared thoughts about their unfamiliarity with the bike but appreciated the seller's decision to go 'no reserve' in the auction. @djjazzy53 reflected on the historical backdrop of the 1920s when the bike was made, noting its remarkable design and construction. The emotional connect and narrative shared by @prancinghorse about the bike's history and its long period in the seller's collection provided depth, turning it into more than just a vehicle; it became a piece of history.
Negative: Not all comments were purely positive; some highlighted reservations about ownership. @justpaul humorously noted the dual challenge of affording the bike and the temptation to ride it, while @TNenthusiats raised concerns about the originality of components, questioning if any replacement parts were used in its restoration. @oscarh53 also probed into the serial number issues, implying there might be discrepancies related to the bike's year. Overall, there were few criticisms directly aimed at the bike itself, but rather practical considerations regarding ownership and authenticity.
|
 |
Positive: @Doctodd praised the vehicle for its stunning color combination, highlighting how the yellow exterior beautifully complements the red interior, stating that this choice is a refreshing departure from the typical black interiors. @milage echoed similar sentiments, calling it the best color combination they have seen on a 360, noting the cohesion between the Ferrari's original racing color and its interior features. Also, @Hulk2000 shared a view that the color combo is indeed polarizing yet rare, emphasizing that this specific yellow/red configuration is likely the only one they've encountered in person.
Neutral: Commentors expressed curiosity and sought clarification about various aspects of the car, such as its location (@ridewhencan), its service history (@JayRingo77), and specific vehicle conditions like clutch life and gas gauge functionality (@dkalyuzhny and @Teavenger). There was also a mix of general admiration and discourse around the rarity of the car, with several individuals noting their experiences and encouraging the seller, @Wob, to keep bidders informed through updates during the auction. @Dcnblues even brought up an aspect of the car's exhaust to inquire about potential smog implications in California, marking a clear interest in the car's operational details.
Negative: While most comments leaned towards the positive or neutral, some highlighted concerns; for instance, @JayRingo77 expressed disappointment over the limited service history associated with the car, suggesting an expected connectedness to early examples that might have had more thorough records. @tuxseto made a light-hearted jab regarding the color scheme, comparing it to Ronald McDonald, and @kerrywittig posed several technical questions about potential issues with the vehicle, reflecting a tone that hinted at skepticism regarding its mechanical condition. This combination of playful banter and genuine inquiry indicates that some potential buyers held reservations about the car's history and current state.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments for its appearance and condition. @Sjo described the Formula Red color as looking more beautiful than earlier models, calling it a gorgeous car. @Finny76 and @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 praised the stunning visual appeal of the NSX and appreciated the owner's decision to restore it to stock condition. @boaboyoz expressed admiration for the 'beautiful Bridgeport NSX-T in red,' while @theforce88 wished the seller good luck, indicating a positive overall perception of the vehicle's aesthetic and craftsmanship.
Neutral: @SammySammy (The Seller) provided detailed information regarding the car's history and maintenance, noting the meticulous care that has gone into preserving this example. The car has had only gentle seasonal driving since acquisition, is garage-kept, and maintenance has been performed annually with high-quality products. @CarGuyPR inquired about potential paintwork while @Need_A_Trailer clarified that 'New Formula Red' is the factory color designation. @Xraydelta1 also prompted a discussion regarding the condition of certain areas of the car, particularly the driver's seat bolster wear, which he noted as common for this model.
Negative: Several comments raised concerns about specific details of the vehicle's maintenance. @Cooper1205 and @kriskenji pointed out a potential error in billing regarding power steering fluid, while @Xraydelta1 suggested the need for a compression test after the removal of forced induction parts, expressing skepticism about the vehicle's long-term performance without it. Furthermore, @alum04org mentioned aging materials, hinting at possible storage-related degradation, and @wild_turkey noted differences in color variations over time that could affect the vehicle's appeal to buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Mike_Breinin expresses his admiration for the vehicle, noting it resembles a Hot-Wheels car with its bold look and fun proportions. @mark01 shares similar feelings, reflecting on the charm and nostalgia of the car, especially recalling the times he raced slot cars of similar design. @Valiantjim appreciates not only the vehicle's wild design but also its impact as a fun and attention-grabbing sports car. @hbjacket excitedly describes it as 'drugs on wheels' and highlights its unique appeal. The seller, @rejeepautomotive, clarifies certain features of the vehicle, such as the GPS speedometer and engine performance, to potential buyers, further showcasing confidence in the vehicle's specs and build.
Neutral: Several comments provide additional context about the design and functionality of the car. @68Vet notes the lack of air conditioning, potentially affecting comfort in warm conditions. @redcloud1728 raises questions regarding the intricate details of its suspension, revealing a discussion among enthusiasts on engineering terms and specifications. @gwn inquires about the car's size concerning taller drivers, while @hectopascal confirms that it accommodates individuals over six feet. These inquiries indicate an interest in practical usability beyond pure aesthetic appeal, reflecting a blend of admiration and curiosity about the vehicle's features.
Negative: On the downside, there are some critiques regarding the vehicle's features. @redcloud1728 dislikes the appearance of the headers, referring to them as 'ugly warts' on an otherwise stunning design. @Basil017 and @redcloud1728 debate the term 'cantilever' when discussing the suspension system's design, with @redcloud1728 accusing the seller's description of being misleading. @casejam comments negatively on the rear wheels' aggressive offset, raising questions about the vehicle's design choices. Overall, these comments reflect a mix of skepticism and desire for clarification among potential buyers and enthusiasts.
|
 |
Positive: @1600veloce (The Seller) provides a thorough overview of the 1988 Chevrolet Corvette Callaway Twin Turbo 4-Speed, emphasizing the quality and dedication behind the sale with over 1,960 listings. Commenters, like @Mike_Breinin and @00SolarTJ1, express admiration for the car's features such as its color, manual transmission, and rarity compared to other Corvettes. @NCRSmaniac reminisces about the nostalgia this model brings, highlighting its unique appeal in car shows and events.
Neutral: Several comments touch on technical aspects and history regarding the vehicle. @merrillm and @9MPGLOL inquire about the car's mileage, showcasing a concern regarding discrepancies in the listed information. @patrickquade asks about the durability of the engine, with answers from other enthusiasts like @rgilson7 explaining the reliability of these turbo engines and maintaining that they require regular service. Others, like @F1Guy and @pete_callaway, discuss the rarity of the specific model with aero modifications, providing insight into its market value and production numbers.
Negative: On the flip side, there are concerns raised about the vehicle's history, particularly regarding mileage inconsistencies noted by @jimmc9876. @Streetbu questions why the car is being listed again, suggesting a potential unresolved issue from the previous auction. @8tony comments on mechanical concerns about the car's odometer, indicating that issues might have been present in other C4 models. This uncertainty surrounding the mileage creates some doubt among potential buyers about the vehicle's condition and reliability.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its impressive build quality and aesthetic appeal. @DLHAMILTON praises the flawless build, stating he wouldn't change anything about it, and @AlbertaBoy shares fond memories of his own Nova, complimenting its sleek black over black design. @WishfulThinker23 notes the video showcasing its acceleration, indicating the car's powerful performance. @Carpatrick and @MonteCutlass also contribute to the positive feedback, describing it as one of the finest Novas and admiring its overall look. Additionally, numerous commenters appreciate the comfort of the TMI bucket seats and the well-done mechanical upgrades that enhance both driving experience and aesthetics.
Neutral: Several commenters offer practical inquiries and additional observations about the vehicle's components and history. @GSM asks about the total mileage on the build, and whether the engine is new or stock, as well as the rear end ratio. @Mr_Pav requests clarification about the panels replaced during the refurbishment. @cdelguid inquires about the working condition of the vehicle's A/C and heating systems, to which @FOXTAIL (The Seller) confirms they are fully functioning. There is also a request from @rockangel for information regarding power steering and component gaps, showing some interest in the vehicle's functionality alongside its visual appeal.
Negative: There are a few concerns expressed by commenters regarding the vehicle's condition and specifics. @dez points out a potential issue with the passenger door not closing flush compared to the driver side, questioning whether this might affect the vehicle's overall fit. Another commenter, @ssterry, suggests that retaining original poverty caps would have enhanced the vehicle's aesthetic, indicating a degree of dissatisfaction with some design choices. Lastly, @limegreen396 reflects a bit of regret over the lack of an SS hood, revealing a desire for more distinctive features that may have made the Nova even more desirable.
|
 |
Positive: @Fewilson shares a nostalgic story about his past encounter with a similar vehicle, expressing a desire to restore a classic car again at his age, highlighting the emotional connection many enthusiasts have with vehicles like this E-Type. The sentiment reflects a sense of hope and excitement about the possibility of owning and restoring a piece of automotive history. @Dollycat3 acknowledges the vehicle's rough condition but emphasizes the potential for restoration by talented individuals, conveying optimism about its future.
Neutral: @RetroRock discusses the vehicle's VIN, providing context on its model year and how it may not significantly affect the car's value, suggesting a practical approach to the purchase decision. Though he notes some differences, his overall tone remains informational and neutral, reflecting on the history of the car more than its condition. @cbjeep (The Seller) responds to inquiries regarding missing parts, confirming that the car is sold as-is with what is included in the listing, maintaining a straightforward approach.
Negative: @Allan_L. points out substantial modifications made to the engine frame, questioning the lack of disclosure about potential damage. He mentions the complexities involved in welding the specific tubing used for the car's frame, which raises concerns about its structural integrity. @neilpierson25 bluntly states that the car has suffered from 'bad ideas,' while @Jrbmk2 concurs, reinforcing that the unique Reynold's Chrome Moly frame should not be welded, suggesting instead that new parts be sourced to avoid the risks associated with repairs.
|
 |
Positive: Many commentators appreciate the vehicle's aesthetics and specifications, referring to it as a "nice looking car" and a "beauty". @Funkster00 highlighted the model as a final year optioned similarly to their own, noting its appeal. @maw06 emphasized the features, including its low miles, manual transmission, and overall desirable configuration, while @sculptrock and @Marco71190 praised the color combination as striking, enhancing the car's appeal.
Neutral: There were discussions around the vehicle's maintenance history and conditions, with the seller, @Michael-15221, addressing concerns about the oil change timing, rod bearings, and subframe integrity. @Sandman003 and @Mdreiguy debated the relevance of these inquiries for a car with 45k miles. Commentators like @BlueBimmers exhibited interest in particular details such as the tire sizes, suggesting that the vehicle might have been driven minimally, raising questions about its previous ownership history.
Negative: Several commentators expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition based on its maintenance records and reported minor accidents. @PorscheGuy993 pointed out potential concerns regarding the passenger side rear quarter panel damage noted in the Carfax report, and @Jaykojc raised anxieties about the costs of expected repairs associated with high-mileage E46 M3s. Additionally, there were criticisms of the authenticity of parts, with @SCMorgan asserting that the wheels were not original BMW spec, calling for updates to the listing. The seller's admission about the uncertain history regarding repairs may have contributed to a lack of confidence among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The BMW R nineT has garnered considerable praise from enthusiasts, with @Davidlee8 sharing his passion for this model. He highlights its incredible smoothness, linear power, and stunning brakes, noting that it's equipped with Ohlins suspension, which he views as a substantial upgrade. Other commenters like @littlehandegan and @rad echoed the sentiment, describing the bike as exhilarating, planted, and versatile for everyday use, while many express excitement over the bike's aesthetic appeal and unique handling characteristics, making it a beloved choice among riders.
Neutral: Several comments indicate that the bike is a fantastic commuter and capable of weekend rides, with @bbass pointing out its suitability for various uses. The R nineT's design features, such as the adjustable clip-on handlebars and heated grips mentioned by @Davidlee8, sparked discussion among potential buyers regarding comfort options and modifications. @ViperNC elaborated on the bike's customization potential, sharing past experiences that enhanced its performance and personal style. Many enthusiasts shared anecdotes, enhancing the community vibe surrounding the auction.
Negative: A few concerns were raised regarding the bike's configuration, particularly the lack of rear pegs, as noted by @bbass, which could limit passenger options. @gman111111 questioned the adjustability of the handlebars, indicating some confusion about their design, pointing to potential misunderstandings for potential buyers. Furthermore, there was mention of the bike's comfort after prolonged rides from @ViperNC, who indicated that while enjoyable, the seat could be stiff and may lead to fatigue during long journeys.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors like @Gloccamora and @Barnesee express their admiration for the vehicle, calling it a 'time capsule' and highlighting its status as a 'wonderful 4 Star Bowtie car' deserving appreciation within the Corvette community. The seller, @15PALS, acknowledges the car's rich history, documenting its maintenance and preserving its original features. Enthusiasts are excited by the vehicle's pedigree, with @Bike_Acc_Guy praising its beauty and @22truckie noting the car's stunning engine compartment. The rarity of unrestored original C2 Corvettes is emphasized, creating a strong appeal for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments address technical aspects and history connected to the car. @PowerM questions the originality of the POP, to which @15PALS clarifies it is indeed original. Multiple participants share insights on the car's authenticity, including details about repairs and documentation that solidify its collector's value. This dialogue demonstrates a collaborative effort among Corvette enthusiasts to share knowledge, adding depth to the discussion with history and jargon pertaining to these classic vehicles, such as the mention of Bowtie judging and the significance of original parts.
Negative: Concerns about minor issues such as oil leaks and the vehicle's overall condition are expressed, particularly by @Bluredd and @shootnride, who discuss potential discrepancies in the authenticity of original components like the Ansen bellhousing. @15PALS admits there are some leaks and that the brakes need attention, which raises questions about the car's readiness for driving. @Ranchero65 and others note variations in details, such as the confusion surrounding factory specifications versus dealer modifications, indicating that while the car is special, its history is not without complexities that could affect potential bids.
|
 |
Positive: Overall, the comments about the vehicle are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting its appeal and reliability. @DENWERKS, the seller, describes the Cobra as a 'super fun car to drive' and mentions that it is 'completely dialed in.' Several other users such as @Tom_S. and @Scootie also express their admiration for the vehicle and praise the seller for being one of the best on the auction platform, @BaT. @Grumpiestguy shares his excitement about the car's sound and performance, indicating that it is an enjoyable machine. @DENWERKS emphasizes the significance of this auction as their 596th listing and the lack of a reserve price, making it clear that every bid is valuable in acquiring this coveted vehicle.
Neutral: Commenters are also interested in specific details about the car, indicating a neutral yet inquisitive attitude. @JMHarley06 raises a question about the condition of the fiberglass, and @DENWERKS promptly provides clarification, explaining that the perceived crack is just a reflection, showcasing openness and transparency. There are also inquiries regarding technical specifications like the gas tank size, with @RBcobro looking for more information about the vehicle's trunk and gas tank, which @DENWERKS addresses kindly by revealing that the tank is 15.4 gallons and mentions that it might read inaccurately when filled to the top. These interactions suggest that potential buyers are engaged and seeking information before making a decision.
Negative: Some comments do hint at concerns or drawbacks regarding the vehicle. @JMHarley06 initially expresses uncertainty about the condition of the fiberglass but later receives reassurance from @DENWERKS. There is also mention of some minor issues with the tachometer and a disconnected heater, which @DENWERKS explains in a light-hearted manner, suggesting that such features are not essential for a vehicle of this type. While these points do not undermine the overall appeal, they illustrate the presence of minor concerns that potential buyers may want to consider.
|
 |
Positive: @CRUSH praises the vehicle for being simple and well-built, expressing a desire for more vehicles like this one instead of hybrids. @ForidaCracker1996 refers to it as a very nice example and the best of Toyota, highlighting its manual transmission. @SupraFreak compliments the truck's low mileage, V6 engine, and 5-speed transmission, believing it is a vehicle that will last a lifetime, showcasing the peak quality of Toyota's past production.
Neutral: @Slescano (The Seller) engages with the community, thanking everyone for their compliments and bids. They share additional pictures and a video of the vehicle, showcasing its features like manufacture stickers and the cigarette ashtray, noting it’s a non-smoker vehicle. They echo @SupraFreak's sentiment about Toyota's impressive build quality during that era and affirm @CRUSH's point about the manual transmission being enjoyable and fuel efficient.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters shared their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetics and performance. @2002WS6 expressed regret for having sold a similar model, wishing future owners good luck with their new purchase. @Tacey01 referred to the car as 'The G.O.A.T.' and participants like @rlromero praised the car as a beautiful unmolested example. The seller, @Kulovic101, provided thorough details about the car's condition, assuring buyers about the leather being in great shape, and shared that the car was garage-kept, enhancing its appeal. Others recognized the underrated nature of the model, asserting that its value would appreciate over time, and past owners like @SteeringWheelFL expressed regret over selling their own vehicles, reinforcing the car's desirability.
Neutral: The seller, @Kulovic101, maintained an informative tone throughout, responding positively to inquiries about the car's condition, including minor issues concerning the paintwork and other details. Questions regarding seat seams and overall maintenance were addressed promptly, with assurances of no significant problems, even mentioning recent maintenance like an oil change and battery replacement. Meanwhile, @RockyRotella and others asked about the vehicle's documentation and permissions to verify details directly with the previous owner, reflecting a cautious interest in the vehicle's history while indicating genuine interest in the purchase.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism about the vehicle's valuation and market performance. @RiffRaff conveyed disappointment over GM's decision to discontinue Pontiac while suggesting the brand's legacy deserved better recognition. @Yourk9guy criticized the notion of fluffing the listing, implying that the market might undervalue such vehicles. Additionally, inquiries into the car's history, including tire age and any potential blemishes, hinted at concerns buyers had regarding its longevity and maintenance needs. Lastly, the car’s perceived niche status in the market was mentioned by a few, suggesting that while the vehicle is visually appealing, its marketability might be inconsistent across different regions.
|
Fuel-Injected, 350-Powered 1940 Ford Deluxe Convertible Club Coupe Hot Rod
01A663506
Lot 200595
Private Party
 |
Positive: @1967Shelby praises the vehicle for its classic build, particularly noting the suspension and color choices. @rockitdoc calls it "very tasty", while @BusterBeaver admires the 40 Deluxe as a gorgeous street machine and expresses eagerness for the next event. @rmartina describes it as a beautiful high-quality build worth more than its price, and @40fordlover finds it a nice car with minimal changes required. @BigG33 appreciates the fast responses regarding the car's specifications, finding all the information updates to be positive.
Neutral: Comments seeking additional information include questions about the engine displacement, paint condition, and video requests from @464evr, who is curious about everything from cold starts to videos of the top operation. @Hockeyspokes and @HAREBALL raise concerns about potential water damage due to carpet staining. @mike_rockwell notes the high-quality build of the street rod but expresses a preference against the flames and exhaust design. @Mars57 reflects on the car's nostalgia, linking it to family history.
Negative: @pigman criticizes the lack of clarity regarding the engine specifications as well as the issues surrounding carpet staining, suggesting a prior flood concern. Others like @TXDesFox inquire about the absence of power steering and brakes, further adding to the scrutiny. @464evr's comment implies disappointment over the lack of clarity regarding whether the top is manual or automatic, and overall, several comments are tinged with uncertainty regarding the car's condition despite its apparent appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @kmccarthy16 highlights the inclusion of the original hard top in the vehicle listing, along with a beautiful image of it, which enhances the appeal of the car. @Valiantjim expresses a fondness for the Euro bumpers, noting their aesthetic importance and how they align with the true character of the R107 model. He also appreciates the performance benefits of the Euro spec 5.0 liter V8 engine, suggesting it represents the optimal experience for enthusiasts. @reibrown deems the car great and sees it as a fitting companion to another model he owns, underscoring the admiration for its uniqueness and charm.
Neutral: @Lnelson3, the seller, mentions his readiness to answer queries regarding the vehicle and offers to provide more documentation, showcasing transparency in the selling process. He addresses concerns about the vehicle's mileage by referencing Carfax discrepancies and provides an explanation that the odometer was operable when he purchased the car, with current accurate readings supporting the car's condition. @Lnelson3 further discusses historical details about the tachometer, including its conversion from km/h, which piques the interest of potential buyers and adds authenticity to the vehicle's background.
Negative: There are some concerns raised about the vehicle's condition and history. @reibrown questions why the car would require a paint job at 116k miles despite another owner’s claim that their similar model retains original paint after more mileage. @Lnelson3 responds by suggesting the need for a repaint due to road wear, but this raises doubts about the vehicle's care over the years. Additionally, @chrismjaeger seeks clarification on potential mileage inaccuracies, reflecting skepticism that could potentially hinder the sale. Lastly, @badgerboyjake inquires about features that imply modifications or different specifications, indicating uncertainty and interest in the car's original design versus its current state.
|
 |
Positive: @RumbleAuto noted that the 6MT variant is more enjoyable for stock to mild modifications, highlighting its fun factor compared to the 8HP. @MarTex praised the vehicle for its outstanding chassis and balanced handling, describing it as a fun car to drive with impressive power and fuel economy, further mentioning that its rarity on the road adds to its appeal. Additionally, @INF91 shared that with only 1256 Toyota GR Supras produced for 2025, and fewer with a manual transmission, it makes this variant particularly desirable.
Neutral: @robsmcd (The Seller) confirmed that the vehicle is a non-premium spec model, providing information about its price of around $57k and clarifying the number of key fobs available. @kvirk and @montegofd3s discussed the differences between the premium and non-premium specifications, with @kvirk outlining features such as wireless CarPlay and heated leather seats. There were also inquiries regarding the lien on the vehicle, with @Yourk9guy explaining the complexities involved in transferring ownership with an existing lien, highlighting the importance of resolving the lien before sale.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the lien on the car, with @Yourk9guy speculating on the potential complications it may introduce in the sale process, particularly about the auction reserve and the buyer's responsibilities should the sale not cover the lien amount. Other commenters expressed uncertainty, like @kvirk's question on whether this auction was worth pursuing given the constraints posed by the lien. @masahirob's question about the seller's reasons for selling elicited a response from @robsmcd (The Seller) about relocating and needing a different vehicle, hinting at a less than ideal selling situation.
|
 |
Positive: @jefreeto commented that it is a beautiful car and wished luck with the auction. @pcracer47 noted that it is a very nice kit car and appreciated the inclusion of a spare engine, suggesting it adds value to the package. @Matstermag48 pointed out that the seller should clarify that the engine is not removed and that a previously installed engine is included, which is positive clarification for potential buyers.
Neutral: @Pj1956 (The Seller) confirmed that the engine is not removed, describing it as a spare 1650cc in addition to the installed 1750cc engine. The seller also mentioned a lack of information regarding the original builder of the car, stating that the previous owner was not aware either. They planned to take the car to a local cruise event, providing an opportunity for interested buyers to inspect it in person.
Negative: @mbunning expressed concern about the engine removal, questioning if there were underlying issues with the engine, transmission, or electrical components. @robbutler47 criticized the choice of the black interior, suggesting it would look nicer in tan or caramel leather. @Wildbunch appeared skeptical, asking about the manufacturer's tag and the origins of the kit, implying uncertainty about the vehicle's pedigree.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters have expressed admiration for the Harley-Davidson bike being auctioned. @CJIIIFS noted that, while they aren't a motorcycle enthusiast, the bike caught their attention for its striking appearance. @maw06 eagerly anticipates the cold start and ride video, excited to hear the bike's incredible sound. @johnnyb11 appreciates how the bike looks special in person and on the road, even favoring it over the already popular Night Train model. Additionally, @BChas3 commented on the bike's engineering quality, stating it rides and handles better than expected, which has led to regret about selling their previous bike. Overall, there is a general sense of enthusiasm and excitement about the bike's aesthetics and performance.
Neutral: The seller, @31Classics, has been actively responding to inquiries and providing updates throughout the auction process. They clarified that the bodywork repairs were made for cosmetic reasons and that the original parts are still available for potential buyers. The seller also shared details regarding the original color and additional videos that were recently filmed to showcase the bike. They have stated that the original body parts will be offered to the highest bidder at a maximum price of $750. Furthermore, questions from users regarding Carfax reports for motorcycles were addressed, with the seller confirming that such reports are not available for bikes.
Negative: Some potential bidders expressed concerns about the absence of original parts in the auction, which they believe could affect the bike's value. @BobKuz and @Jimmyw1 both stated that they would be more inclined to bid if original body parts were included, and @Jimmyw1 asked for a price on these parts to gauge interest. @Malaka humorously pointed out the repetitive nature of this inquiry, indicating frustration over the unanswered question about the cost of the black denim tins. The absence of a Carfax report for motorcycles, noted by @Hardley, also raises questions among bidders about the bike's history and condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors are impressed with the truck's build quality and performance. @goboysgo expresses enthusiasm about the truck's components, asking about the engine and transmission, while @kevindhamilton admires the incredible build and @Ridgewood praises the F150 for its nice finish. @boaboyoz adds a fun note with a Godzilla-themed song reference, reinforcing his admiration for the truck's build. Additionally, @LionelHutz appreciates the packaging of the engine, highlighting the overall quality of the vehicle. Overall, there is a strong sense of excitement and commendation for the truck among the commenters.
Neutral: There are some inquiries about specific details regarding the vehicle's modifications and build history. @noviesguy asks about the manufacturer build date, which gets answered by @ClaytonDowdell, indicating the build date is 11/76 and elaborating on the truck's driving performance. @777iron raises concerns about the frame's integrity and requests additional information on modifications, particularly pertaining to the motor mounts and frame notches, which @ClaytonDowdell addresses directly, providing assurances about the work done and its quality. Other commenters, such as @BaerBronco, acknowledge the notching as well and appreciate the provided photos, seeking further reassurance.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, there are some concerns and questions regarding the modifications that could potentially affect the truck's performance and value. @777iron is particularly cautious, expressing that he needs to see evidence of controlled welding to be comfortable bidding, as he has had negative experiences with frame modifications in the past. He also notes possible issues with the frame being torch cut for the transfer case fitment, which prompts him to seek further details and photos for clarity. @ClaytonDowdell attempts to address these worries by detailing the work that has been done, but the inquiries from @777iron underscore a sense of caution about the truck's modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @Dan_in_Reno remarked on the car's aesthetics, calling it a nice-looking SS and noted the quality of the photos taken at Bowers. @JosCherry commented on the clean look of the car and praised the Sunset Orange Metallic color. @Hotcarcouple (The Seller) responded to queries about the wheels and other features, confirming that the wheels are original to the car, an unusual option from SLP, and mentioned the car's performance upgrades, which were positively noted by interested parties.
Neutral: Comments reflected curiosity about the vehicle's condition and history. @bdh9898 inquired if all original wheels were available, while @DTatom90 asked about potential bubbling on the sail panel. @Sahara19 questioned the reason for the sale after a short ownership period, and some commenters noted mismatched wheels without expressing strong opinions. @Hotcarcouple provided information, responding to questions about the car’s features and addressed the concerns regarding the wheels.
Negative: Several comments raised concerns over the mismatched wheels. @MattFarley and @cgsmith0524 pointed out that the rear wheels were not original and were likely from a C5 Z06, which led to doubts about the seller’s knowledge regarding the car’s history. @Pacer82 and @MSP_MC echoed these concerns, suggesting that mismatched wheels were uncommon for this model. @JosCherry expressed frustration over the seller's lack of engagement with questions, highlighting a perceived disconnect between the seller and the auction participants.
|
 |
Positive: @oleguy53 comments on the vehicle, describing it as a beautiful tractor, suggesting that the new owner will experience immense joy when driving it, especially in a celebratory setting like a parade. @maw06 shares a fond recollection of their own experiences with tractors, praising the sound of the startup and revealing delightful memories associated with their Grandmother's tractor, which they used for various farming activities. They express that this particular tractor seems well cared for, reinforcing its appeal and wishing good luck with the sale.
Neutral: @Hunterwally expresses interest in the tractor and requests a call to discuss several questions he has, indicating a desire for more information and direct communication regarding the purchase.
Negative: There are no negative comments provided about the vehicle; all references focus on positive experiences and inquiries related to the tractor.
|
 |
Positive: @barryward describes the SSR as a nice vehicle, emphasizing its uniqueness and suggesting that it makes for a great road trip option. @jscifres echoes this sentiment, highlighting the vehicle's impressive features such as a naturally aspirated V8 engine, manual transmission, and convertible design. They both appreciate how the SSR brings joy to onlookers, further underscoring its appeal.
Neutral: @BudHorse poses a question about the production numbers of the Pacific Blue manual versions, underlining the uniqueness of the vehicle. @enc356, the seller, responds by noting that this SSR is stored carefully and has been used sparingly, although they cannot confirm the specific production numbers. @jollyjohn provides additional context about the limited production of Pac Blue in 2006, indicating there were only 532 made, while noting some statistics about transmission types in SSRs.
Negative: @BudHorse mentions the absence of a chrome package in this particular SSR, implying that it would have enhanced its desirability. Although @enc356 intends to gather more information about the production details, they acknowledge the uncertainty surrounding the exact figures. Additionally, @MPETESS10 expresses jealousy over the winning bid, suggesting some competition and desire among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its appealing aesthetics and unique features. @e9er particularly praised the remarkable engine swap and interior, while @Marcon1 described the car as a blast to drive. @WranglerX also appreciated the car's engine modifications, stating that it deserves the horsepower to match its visual appeal. The seller, @Toneloc, maintained a positive outlook, explaining his reasons for selling and sharing personal anecdotes about enjoying the car. He reassured potential buyers of the car's good performance, stating that it drives as well as it looks.
Neutral: Some comments raised questions about specifics concerning the car's condition and functionality, such as the installation of the "Body by Fisher" logo and the potential for water leaks around the t-tops. @BModHydro noted a potential misplacement of the logo while @Tim57 inquired about possible leaks. Additionally, @Kbrmar and @Awakening1 were curious about the motor's origin and the functionality of the A/C system given the modifications. @Texass helped clarify the logo issue, indicating a swap between door sill trims, which @Toneloc confirmed to have corrected.
Negative: On the downside, several users expressed concerns regarding the absence of air conditioning, with @BigSwole remarking on the humidity and heat in the Atlanta area. @Fastone197 and others inquired about viewing the car before bidding, suggesting a level of hesitation due to the lack of A/C and performance specifications, like a dyno sheet. @Thxalot showed interest in a driving video, indicating a need for visual proof of the car's capabilities, which @Toneloc was trying to provide but admitted to challenges in filming. Overall, there seems to be a mix of admiration tempered by practical considerations about the car's features.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the impressive condition and aesthetic appeal of the Yamaha AT3 motorcycle. @RickT206 mentions it as a 'Beautiful Yamaha AT' and wishes the seller good luck with the sale. @BaronVonZeppelin and @ColsTiger also compliment the bike, with Baron stating it is in 'very impressive condition' and ColsTiger recognizing the quality of work done on it. Additionally, @Spider_Mike reminisces about his positive experiences with this model, describing it as reliable, good-looking, and a 'blast to ride'.
Neutral: The seller, @custombolt, actively engages with potential buyers and answers questions regarding the motorcycle's features. They elaborate on the thorough refurbishment and mechanical updates made, indicating careful attention to detail. The seller also addresses inquiries about the fuel tank coating, stating they will provide a photograph soon. This shows a commitment to transparency and customer service in the auction process, which has elicited a mix of curiosity and interest from potential bidders.
Negative: There are minor concerns noted by commenters regarding the motorcycle's electrical system; @projectstw asks if the electric starter is functioning well, and @custombolt responds that while it works well when fully charged, it may require kick-starting occasionally due to a small battery. Additionally, @Homeskoooled suggests a photo of the gas tank could help clarify its condition, indicating that some prospective buyers might seek more detailed information before placing bids.
|
 |
Positive: @SlowNRusty expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle's unique name and features, stating that any car with 'Naked', 'Turbo', '4WD', and '5-Speed' in its model description is appealing to own. @LB1 also shares excitement over the vehicle's versatility, noting its ability to convert into a cargo van, highlighting its practical use.
Neutral: @ArroyoAutoSales, the seller, provides a welcoming introduction to the Daihatsu Naked auction, mentioning their experience selling JDM imports and the modern amenities of the car. They emphasize the vehicle's capability and their ability to assist with shipping, showing they are engaged with potential buyers and willing to answer questions. @Schmidlack reflects on the peculiarities of English word usage in Japanese culture, mentioning the model's unusual name as an interesting insight, while @Jairo shows curiosity about how Japanese car buyers perceive the car's design and naming.
Negative: @RidleysRides humorously expresses concern about the cleanliness of the seats due to the car's name and has a playful take on the potential implications. @mein_auto admits surprise at having come across a Daihatsu Naked, which could suggest a sense of disbelief regarding the vehicle's unique branding. Additionally, @OutOfMyElement references a seemingly apocryphal story about car naming conventions from a friend at Mitsubishi, illustrating the ongoing discussion about unusual car names.
|
 |
Positive: @CultivatedCollector (The Seller) expresses excitement about offering the 2024 Vespa GTS Super 300, highlighting its timeless style and the joy it brings to routine errands. @2ndgearstop brings attention to the seat, noting it may be one of the most expensive seats ever mounted on a GTS 300, indicating its high quality. @Kayemtee, who has extensive experience with older Vespas, vouches for the reliability and performance of the GTS model, suggesting that it's a great option for riders.
Neutral: @enio45 asks about shipping options for the motorcycle, which is a common concern for potential buyers, while @Uby67vw1958 provides information on a shipping company he has used, indicating there are reasonable shipping options available. @CultivatedCollector (The Seller) also mentions that a short cold start video and a brief riding video of the scooter in action are available, which provides transparency to interested bidders about the vehicle's condition and functionality.
Negative: @gh356 points out that the luggage rack and duffel bag setup protruding from the front detracts from the scooter's aesthetics, suggesting that photos without it would be beneficial. @Kayemtee critiques some of the accessories included, stating they may not add much real value and shares concerns about the quality of accessories when exposed to elements, questioning if the bike comes with necessary rain covers. Moreover, there's a concern regarding the scooter's price compared to a new one, with @Kayemtee highlighting the lack of information about any remaining warranty, which might affect buyer consideration.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and condition. @MrVandalschaff noted it was great to see a truck without modifications, while @Vizmark2 complimented the attractive white and blue color scheme, calling it a "definite head turner." Additionally, @pjt76 praised the truck as a great-looking vehicle from a trustworthy seller, and @JpRocketship appreciated the retro vibe, suggesting a positive overall sentiment regarding the vehicle's appearance and appeal.
Neutral: There were several inquiries and clarifications provided by @AlwaysToyota, the seller, regarding the truck's specifications and details. Questions included the status of the bed's alignment, additional photos of any damage, and the vehicle's location. The seller also confirmed the truck's long bed features and addressed inquiries about emissions compliance and modifications. Commenters like @Bcarlson1 and @Olycars sought more detailed visual verification of the truck's condition and potential patchwork repairs.
Negative: However, confusion arose over the vehicle's engine type, with @bikemanbrent questioning the diesel description while @Jflorentine asserted that it was a gas engine. @AlwaysToyota clarified this point multiple times, emphasizing the mistake as a source of misunderstanding. Additionally, there were concerns about the emissions capabilities, with @Liweiliao pointing out that the truck had not passed a California emissions test, which might affect its compliance with local regulations. This raised some doubts among potential buyers about its suitability for use in California.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle for its stunning appearance and high-quality restoration. @JJR7 referred to it as a "pretty car," while @BBB2011 highlighted the immaculate restoration and their involvement in the NCRS judging process. Another user, @Walterroadking, acknowledged the vehicle's beauty and implied that five years of age for its restoration could be a positive factor, as properly done restorations age better. @Johnrapper shared their admiration for the car as well, noting the owner’s attention to detail, suggesting that it is an impressive vehicle worth considering for potential buyers.
Neutral: Some commenters engaged in discussions about the vehicle's market value and auction outcomes without making definitive claims. @Wsby provided insights regarding an auction price from 2020 and questioned whether the market has shifted since then, pointing out that the car had not sold despite being listed at a premium. @Bordeaux provided a general perspective on how auction results can fluctuate, affecting perceived value. These discussions reflect a thoughtful consideration of the car's current standing in the market rather than an outright endorsement or critique.
Negative: Conversely, there were skeptics regarding the price expectations for the vehicle. @Walterroadking expressed disbelief that the car could be sold for as low as $62,000, suggesting it would not sell for anything under $100,000. This skepticism was echoed by @JJR7, who mentioned another vehicle sold for $62,000 and questioned if it came with the same accolades. Additionally, members like @C1lover and @corvettecowboy sought further details about the vehicle's specifications and NCRS judging sheets, implying that potential buyers might have concerns about verifying the quality and history before making any substantial offers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting its unique design and functionality. @boaboyoz described it as "totally adorable and very cool," while @TomPayne called it the "COOLEST thing EVER on BaT!" Other users, like @CKKurtz, highlighted its appeal at car shows, stating it would be a "Fan Favorite." Additionally, @Pocotaligo (The Seller) provided detailed information about the vehicle's fire pump, confirming it to be a functional and serious piece of equipment, adding to its value and allure.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification and more information about the vehicle's features. @Art11151151 inquired about the climate control, specifically whether it included cooling options. @MINI1964 and @Doccw asked questions about water storage and the manual for the water pump, respectively. @Charliejones408 expressed concerns regarding California emissions regulations, indicating a potential barrier for interested bidders. The discussion also included a light-hearted exchange between @peterinPDX and others about the vehicle's purpose and capabilities.
Negative: There were a few reservations expressed regarding the vehicle's practical uses and limitations. @Charliejones408 specifically mentioned concerns about California smog regulations, which could affect its viability in that region. @CKKurtz added a humorous note about fire safety, stating, "Fires are never cute," although they acknowledged the vehicle's charm. Meanwhile, @rfrankov made a joke about the vehicle's size and effectiveness in emergencies, reflecting skepticism about its utility despite its cuteness.
|
 |
Positive: @DennisKing mentions that the 2010 Range Rover Supercharged has been the best L322 he has owned, emphasizing that he has been daily driving it for the last six months. He highlights the significant maintenance work completed on the vehicle, including the timing chains, transmission, and transfer case replacements, which enhances the vehicle's reliability. Commenters like @Sinatra23 and @FXRcR1 commend the vehicle's presentation and care, with @Sinatra23 claiming it's a stellar example and others noting the extensive heavy lifting already done, making it an appealing buy.
Neutral: Several comments acknowledge the vehicle's aesthetic features and condition. @swb911s inquires about the rear window tint and its effect on visibility, while also asking about the windshield chips that have been repaired. @Charleetuner expresses curiosity regarding the reliability of Land Rovers in general, suggesting that, like other vehicle brands, concerns may stem from isolated issues rather than systemic failures. @91Chatel asks specifically about the painted A and D pillars, suggesting that some buyers might prefer original finishes.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the reliability of Land Rovers, as voiced by @Charleetuner, who mentions having heard about reliability issues but notes that many owners still drive these vehicles. @FXRcR1 shares his own experience with the heating issue of his seat, indicating potential challenges that may await buyers. @swb911s's comment also reflects a broader skepticism about specific models, although ultimately he acknowledges the quality and extensive repairs performed on this particular vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Subterranean has presented a beautiful RS motorcycle, praised by many commenters. @craigclark57 noted its excellent upgrades, calling it one of BMW's best sport-touring bikes. @Ant5842 mentioned it's a rare find with the model's unique alloy wheels, likening its value to that of the R90S. @Caymanorcarrera commended the bike's iconic status, while @Motogrotto called it a splendid machine, highlighting its original styling and upgrades.
Neutral: Comments from various users indicated curiosity about the bike's specifications and modifications. @Bobsbikes inquired about the paint source and wheel photos. @jimfarmer and @mototwin1 sought clarification on the brake configurations and carb sizes respectively. @bmwcca1 asked about the replaced clock and voltmeter, while @Skydog appreciated the correctness of the directional signals. @Eaats33 acknowledged the seller's detailed under-tank photos, highlighting their importance in assessing the bike's condition.
Negative: Some users expressed concerns or identified potential issues with the bike. @craigclark57 pointed out a listing error regarding the brake type. @vaboxr and @goodguy mentioned doubts about the rear drum brake while @75NortonCommando questioned whether the bike was suitable for a long ride, showing concern over the tire's age without confirming their safety. @originalbob and @Ant5842 brought up trivia that hinted at the bike's manufacturing quirks, suggesting an interest in the bike's historical context but also implied a lack of perfection.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle receives a lot of positive feedback for its unique and stylish design, particularly praised by @Erioc for its unconventional look which even inspired pop culture. @Dollycat3 admires the rarity and mid-century appeal of the Kaiser Manhattan, highlighting its outstanding 'Safety-Glo' taillights as ahead of its time. Comments from @RidleysRides and @Electraglider express excitement about the car's Art Deco styling and factory supercharger, showcasing their admiration for both its aesthetic and engineering features. The seller, @ekmcmullen, also emphasizes the car's remarkable history and craftsmanship, calling it "an enormous amount of bang for the buck," reassuring potential buyers about its investment value.
Neutral: Several comments provide neutral insights about the vehicle, such as @bkpont.421's note on the seating, mentioning that the seats may be from a 1953 model, indicating a connection to the car's history. The seller @ekmcmullen responds to various queries about the car's features and potential upgrades, indicating an ongoing dialogue and interest from the community. @Electraglider's mention of the supercharger aligns well with the historical context given by @ekmcmullen about similar luxury cars, suggesting a wider appreciation for the model's performance credentials.
Negative: While most comments lean positive, there are some underlying concerns. @1996MBZ points out an issue with the passenger-side front bench seat, indicating a need for cleaning or restoration, highlighting a potential drawback regarding maintenance. The seller acknowledges such concerns, indicating a proactive approach to addressing them by reaching out to fabric suppliers to find matching elements for the interior. The mention of needing to update or clean parts could suggest some uncertainty about the vehicle's current condition, which might deter some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Jags_in_the_barn praises the truck's condition, particularly noting that the underside looks better than any Dodge Ram he has owned, expressing his love for these "super trucks." @caseyandgina mentions their impressive experiences with a 1999 model, indicating that this beauty appears as though it has just come off the dealer's lot. @Clile3 (The Seller) expresses excitement about the truck, highlighting its manual transmission, V8 Hemi power, and the previous owner's care for the vehicle, making it a joy to drive.
Neutral: @Freedom2 and @alshields correctly identified that the truck is equipped with a 5-speed manual transmission, not the 6-speed originally claimed. @gwsellers questions the inclusion of a transmission cooler on the truck, and @mrhemi426 asks about the condition of the dash under the carpet. @vate333 inquires about the date code on the tires, while @Knucklehead47 asks about the bed length, and @caddydaddy70 refers to shipping logistics, expressing trust in the truck's reliability for a long drive home.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about discrepancies and potential inaccuracies in the truck's listing. @Freedom2 expresses skepticism about the claimed 6-speed transmission, which @Clile3 (The Seller) confirms was an error. @mrhemi426 points out that the truck's tires may not be original as claimed, and there is speculation about the transmission cooler not being present. @Old-Ram's inquiry about the K&N air filter also reveals that there could be confusion about the filter's condition, and @tvtommy requests further information about the towing capacity, indicating a need for clearer specifications.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express a strong affection for the Datsun B210, reminiscing about its character and reliability. @HeavyTank77 shares excitement over owning similar models, illustrating the fun and charm inherent in these cars. @NorCalBert even refers to it as the 'all steel cockroach' due to its durability, while @Gman7501 recounts his positive past experience with the vehicle, celebrating its great fuel efficiency and dependability, which they believe surpasses many modern counterparts. This enthusiasm demonstrates the nostalgic connection many have with the B210, highlighting its status as a beloved classic car.
Neutral: The seller, @Datsun210, provides detailed information about the vehicle's history, indicating it has been carefully maintained by their grandparents and kept in a climate-controlled garage. The seller also offers insights about the car's current condition, acknowledging its wear and tear while noting it retains no significant rust. Additionally, there are inquiries regarding the car's specifics, such as the number of hubcaps, operating lights, and functioning components like the radio and air conditioning, which showcase the thoughtful approach potential buyers are taking when considering this vehicle.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, some comments reflect concerns regarding the Datsun B210's age and necessary upkeep. @dengreene shares a cautionary tale about rusted floor pans that impacted a friend's romantic prospects, emphasizing that issues like this should be carefully inspected. @GShag indicates a need for a trailer to transport the car home, highlighting the understanding that the vehicle requires work before it is roadworthy. Additionally, @RWD-FTW humorously remarks on the common phrase 'needs a tune-up,' suggesting that such issues are typical for older cars and might deter some buyers seeking immediate functionality.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its appeal and desirability. @bgilliam, the seller, expresses pride in maintaining the classic Jaguar XK convertible over the past 11 years, emphasizing the care it has received, including servicing by a Jaguar technician. Commenters @Weary_Pilgrim and @DeepSpace praise the car's design and driving experience, with @Weary_Pilgrim calling the build quality excellent and describing it as a joy to own. @DeepSpace finds it beautiful and immaculate, indicating a strong interest in purchasing it for his wife.
Neutral: There are inquiries about the vehicle's maintenance and condition. @JaDawgPNW asks about maintenance records, and @RMNey questions the age of the tires and if any major repairs have been necessary, particularly regarding electrical systems. @bgilliam responds to these inquiries, confirming the presence of maintenance records and detailing recent repairs, including the replacement of the top pump and speakers. The seller also notes that the car has been garage kept and that paint protection was applied in March 2020, indicating a commitment to its upkeep.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about specific aspects of the car's condition. @Vanderwolde points out what appears to be damage on the soft top, while @Rynohd asks for a better picture of glue mentioned in the listing, suggesting potential issues that may need clarification. @bgilliam addresses these concerns by asserting that the left side of the top is fine and clarifying that the marks are simply fold marks, but the issues raised may leave some potential buyers with lingering doubts.
|
 |
Positive: @Creadysetgo describes the vehicle as a "beautiful spec" and expresses disappointment about its availability at a time when funds are low. @MarcL89 admires the natural brown interior, reminiscing about a previous car, and wishes the seller luck with the auction. @JDNY516 compliments the striking color combination, noting that it will undoubtedly attract attention, and even mentions the joy of driving with the top down. Additionally, @dengreene remarks on the vehicle being a nice ride, appreciating its presented condition and sharing a desire for more space to accommodate it.
Neutral: @SharkWhite (The Seller) engages with potential buyers, providing information about the vehicle, including its location in Alexandria, VA, and offering to accommodate in-person showings. @bueller72 questions how the car features both Apple Carplay and Android Auto, given the original factory stereo head unit, to which @SharkWhite responds by clarifying that an accessory for those features is included. The dialogue continues with @mfu77 inquiring about the ownership length, prompting a disclosure from @SharkWhite about approximately 400 miles under his ownership.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the vehicle's condition—@Cara_b asks about the condition of the canvas c-pillars on the convertible top and requests photos. @spikesx5 inquires about potential odors that older models sometimes exhibit due to insulation breakdown, prompting @SharkWhite to guarantee that there are no strange smells. @kirbmac expresses surprise over the lack of cube interior wood trim typically found in ZHP models, leading to speculation from other users, including @Mikeor, about possible modifications.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed great admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its striking color and impeccable build quality. @MBrouder noted it 'looks like a very nice car,' while @citxmech described it as having a 'striking color' and being 'beautiful.' Others, like @David_P, emphasized its allure, declaring that the car is "hott with two 't's." Enthusiasts like @McDeeb applauded its performance and detailed build, praising the precision and materials used in the car's construction. Overall, the car garnered a lot of positive remarks, with others like @Carbine123 calling it an 'absolute STUNNER' and portraying it as an exceptional example among mid-year Carreras.
Neutral: The seller, @curiousoffice, engaged actively with potential buyers, providing detailed information on the car's features and specifications. He acknowledged that some may find the car's color polarizing but expressed a love for its uniqueness. Various users offered constructive criticism, such as @Twickes suggesting the car's photography could benefit from a professional touch. Others like @TBirdBloodshack inquired about specific elements of the build, demonstrating that while there are significant pros to the car, there is also a desire for clarity around certain aspects of its condition and design choices.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback, some comments raised concerns about specific issues. @TBirdBloodshack pointed out a gap at the driver's side window, asking if it was a flaw that needed addressing. @jcvass highlighted potential concerns with the carbon roof panel's attachment and suggested that it might need future attention. Additionally, the question of why such a highly modified vehicle had only accumulated 400 miles since its build raised eyebrows among some enthusiasts. Comments like those from @Boston964 expressed a desire for greater acknowledgment of the car's builder, implying that the seller should be more transparent about the car's history and contributions from others in its construction.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed appreciation for the seller's quick responses and helpful information regarding the Jeep's technical specifications, including the gear ratio of 5:13 in the Dana 60. The vehicle was praised for its comfort at higher speeds, with the seller stating it comfortably cruises at 2,200 RPM at 70 mph due to its well-designed components, such as the lower arms drop brackets from the EVO 4.5 overlanding kit. Many participants also showed excitement for the listing updates and additional photos shared by the seller, which helped clarify features.
Neutral: Several comments revolved around inquiries regarding the vehicle’s specifications and features. @bjbstewart asked about tow capacity, while @NHPiper needed clarification on the air compressor's location and its function, along with questions about tire sets and steering modifications. The seller addressed these inquiries with factual responses, noting that previous information had been removed or clarified, and provided details on the different locker types and steering components used in the build.
Negative: There were concerns raised by commenters about missing elements such as the handbrake cable, which was stated to be back-ordered due to COVID-19 disruptions, leading to some dissatisfaction. Additionally, @NHPiper and others expressed confusion over the features such as the air lockers and steering components, indicating a lack of clarity in the vehicle's build specifications. @JakeTheSnake115's request for more photos of the bed area highlighted a demand for greater transparency regarding the vehicle’s condition and features.
|
 |
Positive: @YellowZ51 comments on the vehicle's attractiveness, praising its overall maintenance and restoration compared to others in its class, expressing enthusiasm for owning it. @Erioc admires the car's beauty, noting that the color change is well-executed and the interior is flawless, wishing good luck to potential bidders.
Neutral: @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) promotes the auction of the classic 1957 Ford Thunderbird, highlighting its reliability and readiness for a new owner. The seller acknowledges previous inquiries about the car's condition, affirming that everything functions correctly, but pointed out that the radio quality is subpar and there may be minor oil drips—a common characteristic.
Negative: @Boat_Man raises a concern about the gas door alignment in the photos, questioning whether the spring hinge is broken. @VAL440NZ also seeks reassurance about the vehicle's condition, specifically asking about rust and the functionality of various components, indicating a desire for further validation of the vehicle's quality.
|
 |
Positive: @MPM97turbo praises the vehicle's Arctic Silver color, emphasizing how it highlights the contours of the hand-built 993 design, particularly under varying light conditions. They appreciate the combination of the black interior with the exterior color and mention the car's clean condition and great mileage. @Envypete (The Seller) accentuates that this 1997 Porsche 911 Carrera 2S is a magnificent vehicle for air-cooled enthusiasts, highlighting its iconic design and comfortable driving experience, especially with its Tiptronic automatic transmission. He assures potential buyers that the car is in exceptional shape and ready to enjoy, having recently undergone numerous service updates.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @100smilesagallon and @jiribellsouth, inquired about the process of importing the vehicle to the U.S., showing interest in logistics rather than specific opinions about the car. @CarSeeker asked the seller whether there are service and maintenance records for the vehicle, while @Stepside4x4 inquired about records prior to the seller's ownership. @boaboyoz expresses admiration for the car's appearance and wishes the seller good luck with the auction, indicating a general appreciation for the vehicle.
Negative: @lekrz points out that the absence of a sunroof is notable, while also raising a concern about the potential costs associated with necessary repairs, specifically mentioning the driver door check. @Stepside4x4 mentions the lack of detailed service records, which @Envypete (The Seller) acknowledges, explaining that such records can be scarce for imported vehicles but offers the Japanese inspection records as a valuable alternative. Additionally, @cantaffordit24 acknowledges the car's iconic status but hints at the higher costs associated with acquiring it.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praised the vehicle, calling it a beautiful S500, while @Albert0037 remarked that for its age, the car looks to be in great shape. @DylanPip, the seller, reiterated this by confirming that the car is dependable, drives great, and has no leaks of any kind, emphasizing that despite its cosmetic wear, it is still reliable. The overall sentiment about the vehicle's appearance and functionality was largely favorable.
Neutral: @CactusJackSentMe raised several inquiries regarding the car's electronic functions, such as the driver power seats, steering wheel adjuster, and air conditioning, which @DylanPip clarified. While there were concerns regarding a potential repair for the driver seat adjustment, @DylanPip confirmed that all other electronics were working well, and provided updates about blown fuses being replaced. Furthermore, inquiries were made about the condition of the armrest and whether there were any gaps in the mirrors or a dent on the driver’s door, which the seller addressed by stating that those features needed no repair despite showing normal wear and tear for the vehicle’s age.
Negative: @Adissit72 and @Acct89 raised concerns about the oil pressure and various cosmetic issues such as a dent under the driver’s door handle and a bumper not sitting flush. @CactusJackSentMe also noted a potential issue with misalignment in the rear right reflector and asked for the clarity of this damage. @DylanPip responded by indicating that while some parts showed wear, these were typical for a 27-year-old car and reassured that there were no functional issues but acknowledged the concern regarding its cosmetic appearance.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous commenters expressed their admiration for the SAAB 900 Turbo's beauty and design. @executan called it a "beauty" while @Hammer80 commented on its sexiness. @GregAdamsIL noted its impressive condition, highlighting how rare it is to find a non-convertible version in such shape. @Bimmerm535 echoed this sentiment, calling it a clean and rare example. Enthusiasts reminisced fondly about their personal experiences with the vehicle, with @EstobanMcQueen appreciating how the 900s are aging gracefully and @Caymanorcarrera reflecting on the vehicle's capacity and handling. Additionally, @BobD regarded this specific model year as one of the most desirable in the series.
Neutral: Several comments provided technical insights about the vehicle's condition and performance. @mikewood (The Seller) detailed the SAAB's odometer reading, clarifying the exchange of speedometer and odometer units and the car's potential resale mileage. There were discussions on the car's significant surface rust on suspension components, but the body remained solid. @JoshRan suggested potential issues with the fuel tank, prompting further discussions on necessary repairs. Observations about the car's boost gauge and comments about the interior features were shared, indicating that while there are known issues, the comments were generally prudent and informative.
Negative: Despite much appreciation, some commenters raised concerns about potential issues. @major362000 noted visible orange peel in the paint on the driver's side, questioning if the door was repainted, although this was countered by @mikewood (The Seller) who stated that the texture is typical for the original paint. @goose_box brought attention to spider cracks in the windshield, asking about future repairs, which @mikewood acknowledged but noted that the windshield remains original SAAB. @phred14 worried whether the car could handle a cross-country trip without AC or cruise control, suggesting it might be uncomfortable under certain conditions.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beautiful design and classic appeal. @alaninvancouver gave the car a perfect score of 10/10 for its vibrant red color scheme. @jimjim noted the car's aesthetic with praise for its opening photo and the community's response at car shows. @AdamG454 shared that the engine retains plenty of excitement even at higher RPMs, reinforcing the joy of driving such an iconic model. Others, such as @Jefferylu98 and @sludgo, remarked on the unique character and performance of the LT-1, which brings them happiness while driving. Overall, the standout features and classic styling have won the hearts of many enthusiasts.
Neutral: Comments around the technical aspects of the vehicle highlighted a mix of opinions regarding its horsepower evolution over the years. Various members, including @Curvette1 and @gaw, discussed the changes made to the LT-1 engine from 1970 to 1972, particularly the compression ratio drops and shifts from gross to net horsepower ratings. These adjustments were reflected in the dyno figures discussed in the thread, with several users explaining how these variables impacted performance. Additionally, @ShowMeStingray remarked on the history of the engine rebuilds and requested more information on recent modifications, indicating a community interest in understanding the vehicle's mechanics more deeply.
Negative: Some users voiced concerns about aspects of the vehicle, particularly regarding the power output and performance issues related to the engine rebuild. @Vettes33 expressed worry about the oil pressure levels, which could raise flags for potential problems. @Johnnyvett specifically noted a significant reduction in horsepower and compression ratios over the years, suggesting dissatisfaction with how the vehicle has been 'dumbed down' compared to earlier models. Additionally, @RowdyRat and @JosCherry raised questions about ensuring the authenticity of certain engine components and parts used in the rebuild, reflecting a cautious attitude among potential buyers. This scrutiny shows that while the car is loved, there are still performance and historical details under review.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its striking design and uniqueness. @Srk14105 calls it a "beautiful car," while @Hulk2000 praises the yellow color, noting it should attract good offers. Additionally, @stg83 describes the car as "lovely" and appreciates its classic status. The seller, @Bulletmotorsportsinc, responds positively to bids and encourages buyers with comprehensive details, saying they strive for transparency in their listings. Overall, there is a general appreciation for the car's aesthetic and the seller's approach to the auction.
Neutral: Several comments delve into specifics about the car, particularly regarding modifications and features. @Dondo1 inquires about viewing the car, while @no_one raises questions about the headlamp operation and asks whether modifications have been made. There are mixed opinions on the silver accents, with @bforbesut accepting them while others question their impact on the vehicle's value. @Bulletmotorsportsinc responds to inquiries with clarifications, affirming their commitment to providing detailed and accurate information about the car before bidding.
Negative: On the downside, some comments criticize the silver accents and modifications, with @Yehaaa urging the seller to remove them entirely. @tw7175 expresses disappointment over previous concerns about the paint, suggesting it detracts from the vehicle's appeal. @Thailand mentions the paint quality and alignment issues in the exterior trim, suggesting these may affect its collector value. There are also accusations that this listing might be a "flip" from a previous auction, adding to skepticism about the car's history and condition. Overall, the car faces scrutiny from those who prefer original factory specifications.
|
 |
Positive: @AllanChambers expressed fondness for the truck, recalling it as his first car in the early 80s, indicating a strong sentimental value associated with the vehicle. @sazimer (The Seller) highlighted that this car runs great and benefits from additional features like power steering and front disc brakes, making it more comfortable and safe to drive. The seller also mentioned the vehicle's original motor, which is said to run well without any internal modifications, adding further appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the heating capabilities of the vehicle. @goldenbear53 asked about heat in the cabin, to which @Chamba responded that in his decades of experience with similar vehicles, heat was rarely needed due to how hot the floorboards get from engine and exhaust heat. This aligns with @sazimer (The Seller)'s information that the vehicle does not have a heater installed, relying instead on an air conditioning unit to help manage temperature.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects highlighted, the absence of a heater could be seen as a drawback for some users. @goldenbear53's initial question reflects a concern that potential owners might have about comfort in colder conditions. The comments collectively suggest that while there are known strengths, such as its performance and nostalgic value, some practical limitations exist, particularly regarding heating capabilities.
|
 |
Positive: The comments from various enthusiasts highlight the unique qualities and rarity of the vehicle, particularly the 1971 Gran Coupe model. @Raffi notes that there are likely fewer than ten built with the specific combination of features this car possesses, making it quite exceptional among collectors. The aesthetics of the black paint and gold vinyl top have garnered admiration from multiple users, with @floorit426 mentioning the "menagerie of interesting options" and @70Cudalife praising the amazing color combination. Overall, many commenters express excitement about the car's build quality and restoration efforts, emphasizing the potential joy for the future owner.
Neutral: A number of users have pointed out aspects regarding the original drive train and features of the vehicle. @MikeDTaz mentions the unfortunate fact that without the original 383 engine, it will never be matching numbers again, although he still finds the car outstanding. @Stepside4x4 seeks clarification on the interior color, which was confirmed by the seller @VICASSOMOTORSPORTS as gold instead of beige, showcasing the diligence in detailing the car’s specifications. The conversation reflects a mix of nostalgia and practical considerations about the car’s authenticity versus its modified state.
Negative: There are critiques regarding the modifications made to the vehicle compared to its original specifications. @RSI700VIPER raises questions about the dual snorkel hood and gilled fenders, which he believes were not standard features for Gran Coupes. Further, several commenters like @69Daytona and @ChargeRTBob mention the implications of any departures from factory specifications, suggesting that without original components, the car's value could potentially diminish. This sentiment is echoed by @OneOfEach, who expresses a contrasting perspective, advocating for using the car as a driver instead of heavily focusing on its collector status.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and classic design. @Boatymcboatface referred to it as a beautiful example, while @SBT loved the coupe's iconic shape, calling it beautiful in its colors. @ripper996 praised its aesthetics, stating it’s in the 'ONLY color it should wear'. @farm-jag shared a nostalgic connection to the model, linking it to their childhood and further expressing temptation to own one now. Additionally, @Oldisgoodtoo noted the impressive service history, indicating the car was well cared for.
Neutral: The discussion included various questions and clarifications regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @kginsberg (The Seller) provided detailed responses about maintenance and repairs, assuring potential buyers about the lack of leaks and the vehicle's performance in previous drives. Several users, such as @Upstate101 and @Gjag484z, raised inquiries about possible leaks and fuel smells, to which the seller responded reassuringly. Comments from @Dutchinterest sought specific details about the headliner and A/C functionality, indicating careful consideration by potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were also raised regarding the vehicle's history and potential issues. @Neilv inquired about an accident report, expressing skepticism about the repainting of the driver door. @Gjag484z was particularly worried about possible fuel smells, referencing past experiences with inadequate fuel systems in similar models. The seller, @kginsberg, tried to alleviate these concerns but acknowledged the validity of worries surrounding fuel issues, which seems to resonate with others who shared their experiences. Overall, while there was considerable enthusiasm for the car, some expressed caution based on past issues with Jaguar vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @Cars3D praises the vehicle for its unique coupe build, indicating it deserves a second glance. @wfrancis2 (The Seller) has received positive feedback from @CarSafari, who appreciates the craftsmanship and shares excitement with family about the car while highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @PonyboyBoss expresses approval for the 3-valve engine, noting that it's a respectable choice over the more commonly desired coyote engine, appreciating the build overall.
Neutral: There are inquiries for specifics about the engine's type that @wfrancis2 (The Seller) clarifies as a modern 3V 4.6L V8 from a newer Mustang GT, confirming it has only 70k miles. @wfrancis2 is proactive in response to comments, uploading new photos and videos for potential buyers to review, showing engagement in the auction process. Some commenters, like @funkaholik, suggest improvements in the auction presentation by requesting better-lit photographs and driving videos to enhance interest.
Negative: Some comments point out minor concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, with @mustanglover123 questioning whether there’s paint cracking or issues with the cowl area. @wfrancis2 notes this imperfection but mentions they are prepared to address it with matching paint. @wfrancis2 also explains that the lower bumper's shape is not a flaw, but instead a designed contour, illustrating the challenges of addressing aesthetic concerns in the auction.
|
 |
Positive: @Krench (The Seller) describes the vehicle, a beautifully restored 240, as a prime example of Auslander’s work, noting its reliability and appeal as a head-turner. He mentions driving it 1,000 miles home without any issues and expresses regret in parting with it due to a lack of garage space. The car has a documented service history that showcases it has been well cared for, which adds to its allure for potential buyers.
Neutral: Various commenters, such as @dieselbenzman and @masterqi, show interest in the car's history and previous caretakers, asking for more specifics about the engine overhaul and its current condition. @Krench clarifies that detailed records from the engine overhaul by Auslander are unavailable but reassures potential buyers about the good service history of the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns about the car’s condition are voiced by commenters like @Kurt7700, who inquires about the rust in the trunk wheel well area. @Krench responds that the rust is minimal and mostly surface-level, limited to specific areas, but the mention of rust raises caution among potential buyers regarding the overall integrity of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Valiantjim expressed excitement about the "Dual Tesla S battery packs," highlighting the off-grid capability of the vehicle, while @Piros1 described the setup as "awesome" and noted it as an inspiration for their own build. @jagarcia89 praised the comprehensive amenities the vehicle offers, indicating a well-thought-out conversion. @rtwPaul shared personal experience of the vehicle, referring to the build as "spectacular" and complimenting the detailed execution of the design. Notably, @spasq0712 (The Seller) showcased the vehicle's functionality and comfort for extended off-grid living, including high-quality solar systems and excellent insulation with a diesel heater that works efficiently, demonstrating effective power management.
Neutral: Several commentators expressed curiosity about the vehicle's specifications and functionalities. For instance, @OllieinAZ pointed out potential discrepancies in mileage and hours, which @spasq0712 addressed with insights about the vehicle's previous use as an ambulance. @aig010 inquired about the diesel heater and air conditioning operation during off-grid use, seeking clarification on power dynamics. Additionally, @Greasepower asked for information about the fuel system and alternator capacity, showcasing an interest in the vehicle's technical aspects. Furthermore, @Bad51 requested the standing headroom clarification, which @spasq0712 provided, indicating the vehicle's practicality for various users.
Negative: @Piros1 questioned why the sellers were parting with the vehicle given its impressive build and the investment that went into it. @aig010 expressed uncertainty regarding air conditioning usage and the potential impact on battery life, raising concerns about the vehicle's practicality in varying climates. @Kstyles pointed out the absence of a tow hitch, which could limit its versatility for potential buyers. Another issue raised by @Pos3idon involved the vehicle's tire longevity, as the tires were projected to need replacement sooner than expected. Lastly, some users, like @schigh, commented on the complexity of operating the vehicle's various systems, which might deter less experienced users from comfortably utilizing all features.
|
 |
Positive: @MikeB003 complimented the vehicle's build and requested video and audio of the supercharger in action, indicating an interest in the vehicle's performance features. @Shelmschu123 (The Seller) responded positively by mentioning that the requested video was uploaded, which demonstrates a level of engagement from the seller with potential buyers.
Neutral: Questions were raised by @Chriszark regarding the A/C functionality and any potential leaks in crucial components such as the motor, transmission, or transfer case. @Lanigiro asked for clarification on the auxiliary fuel tank, seeking details on whether it was an additional tank or a replacement. These inquiries indicate potential buyers are looking for assurance and verification of the vehicle's condition and features.
Negative: @Shelmschu123 (The Seller) addressed concerns raised by @Chriszark, assuring that the A/C works well and that a thorough inspection in May confirmed there were no leaks in seals or gaskets. Additionally, @Shelmschu123 clarified for @Lanigiro that the auxiliary tank is indeed separate from the main tank, implying some complexity to its operation, which could be seen as a potential downside for some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its lovely appearance and beautiful interior. @Heron described it as "lovely," while @AutoPazzo mentioned its great look with a beautiful interior and asked for a driving video. The combination of Euro and North American details found in the GTV was also appreciated by @bobm45, who highlighted its interesting features. Overall, the car garnered positive reactions regarding its aesthetics and design.
Neutral: The seller, @pcracer47, provided a detailed overview of the vehicle’s history, repairs, and features. He mentioned that the upholstery work was done by Amadeus Upholstery and referred to the history of the car, including its previous ownership and the work it had undergone. He acknowledged some minor imperfections in the paint and body of the vehicle, indicating that although it is not a Pebble Beach Concours car, it is still quite appealing. He encouraged potential bidders to inspect the vehicle in person or send a professional for assessment.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about specific functional issues with the vehicle, particularly the door handles not working properly as highlighted by @Westernhighlander. The seller explained that the handles jam partway, prompting him to use the inside handles for access. Additionally, @AutoPazzo pointed out the possible presence of orange peel in the respray and some scratches, suggesting the car could be a "ten footer," meaning it looks good from a distance but has close-up imperfections. These comments underscore areas where potential bidders might need to pay close attention.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's condition, with @pat.bmw noting its history of excellent care under the original owners from 1998 to 2015. @sl600 praises the Style 8 wheels for their perfect fit on the E31 model, emphasizing the plush ride they provide. Additionally, @Ziad82 described the car as beautiful and requested more night-time images to showcase its stunning exterior and interior lighting, highlighting the vehicle's aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Several users have inquired about the car's operational features, with questions from @Nickmd1403 and @AR106 focusing on the functionality of the power seats, sunroof, infotainment system, and any potential body rust. @cbjeep (The Seller) responded affirmatively to these inquiries, stating the power seats are functioning well, confirming no rust on the body, and assuring that they will upload a new video to address these questions comprehensively. @WildRev expressed interest in inspecting the vehicle in person, showing engagement from potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised about specific functionalities of the car, with @OH_carguy mentioning a disconnected cable he observed, prompting a clarification from @cbjeep (The Seller) about it being a Bluetooth microphone. @trochte99 asked if the AC evaporator leaks, to which @cbjeep confirmed that the AC is working properly. While there were no negative reviews about the vehicle's ability or care, the questions indicate a cautious approach from potential buyers seeking assurance on the vehicle's features.
|
 |
Positive: @walkercagle commented that the truck looks nice, and @Dollycat3 suggested it is likely used for towing behind an RV, which implies versatility and functionality. Additionally, @tco (The Seller) noted the utility of the front receiver hitch, explaining how useful it has been for someone who struggles with backing up a trailer, emphasizing the truck's practicality for various users.
Neutral: @tco (The Seller) shared that he has driven about 6,500 trouble-free miles since purchasing the truck, and that he travels frequently between Redondo Beach and Prescott, AZ. He mentioned the reason for selling, stating that he currently owns too many trucks and is in the process of downsizing, which offers insight into the seller's situation without criticism of the vehicle itself.
Negative: @Auction_Closed raised questions about the seller's decision to sell the vehicle after only a few thousand miles, expressing skepticism about the timing of the sale and the investment made. @rainandroad also questioned the truck's history, asking for clarification on its title and registration, which could imply concerns about transparency or potential issues related to the vehicle's past.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's stunning aesthetics and exceptional condition. @Bug36T57 highlighted the beautiful color combination while @sga3532 simply stated "Perfection!" Commenters like @BloodyHell and @AbbyAk praised its underrated stealthy color and the overall presentation of the car, with @911r (The Seller) describing it as "Porsche perfection" and emphasizing its investment-grade status. The excitement for additional content showcasing the vehicle's features and performance was evident, with commenters eagerly anticipating videos and photography of the car.
Neutral: Several comments provided insights into the car's history and specifications, such as @DB2 noting an enthusiastic owner's detailed thread on the vehicle and @RMCII discussing previous ownership of a similar model. @Biasply clarified some technical details about production features, prompting an acknowledgment from @911r (The Seller) of the correct specifications for the car. This exchange reflects a shared interest in the car's historical context and technical accuracy, appealing to both immediate bidders and enthusiasts.
Negative: There were some critiques regarding the authenticity of certain parts of the vehicle. @VintageExcellence pointed out that the S bumper with integrated spoiler was not available for the 1970 model, suggesting potential mismatches in specifications. This observation led to a back-and-forth clarification among commenters about production details, with @RMCII reflecting on his own experiences with a different 1970 S model that featured a chin scoop. Though generally positive in tone, these comments indicate a level of scrutiny that some potential buyers may have regarding the vehicle's originality and parts.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its original condition and unique features. @64s mentioned that the car looks great and is mostly original, while @Mayjer noted that this model and the 1300 Cooper Export are perhaps the best-appointed MINIs ever produced. @Automark appreciated the long-term investment of the seller, praising the documented improvements and maintenance on the car, which demonstrates pride in ownership. There were also compliments about the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle, with @Ladoubled calling it a lovely model and @Valkyrja recognizing similarities to their own car. Overall, the vehicle receives a lot of positive feedback regarding its design and heritage.
Neutral: Several comments discussed logistical aspects regarding the vehicle, such as registration and transport. @DB6 pointed out that identifying specific features of the car can help in various settings, including car shows. @Maltese_Falcon brought attention to potential registration issues in California, while @wilburhaines confirmed that the car is smog exempt under existing laws. The discussion around transport raised questions about cross-country transportation due to the vehicle's wheel width, as mentioned by @TheDaVinci. There were practical inquiries about the operational status of various components like gauges and the heater, with @McKim specifically asking about these features.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns or questions about aspects of the vehicle that might deter potential buyers. @motowfo and @Mauly4 inquired about the roll cage, questioning whether it was installed for racing or general safety. @m2711c also expressed curiosity about its racing history, which could imply concerns about the vehicle's past use. Additionally, @DB6's inquiry about the radiator fan orientation hints at potential reliability issues if it was not correctly installed. Furthermore, while many appreciate the modifications, some might wary of the implications of such changes as they could affect the car's value or originality.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight the impressive craftsmanship and aesthetic appeal of the 1989 Otokar Land Rover 110. @whynotbuy appreciates the updated interior, noting that the refined espresso brown is an improvement over the previously neon orange. @ApexAutoVault commends the color combination and craftsmanship, suggesting that the future owner will be exceedingly pleased. Many commenters, including @WAGONBOYTD, point out that the custom metallic BMW P7T Emerald Green finish is exceptionally well-executed, bringing a sophisticated and unique look to the classic vehicle, making it stand out in the crowd.
Neutral: The seller, @KayaDesign, provides detailed information about the restoration process and the vehicle's specifications. They clarify the title confusion, explaining that the vehicle was built in 1989 but first registered in 1990. They note important aspects such as the choice of the original 3.5L V8 engine, rebuilt to enhance performance while remaining period-correct. Responding to questions from commenters, @KayaDesign elaborates on the vehicle's history, the materials used for the interior restyling, and the professional restoration process that involved comprehensive upgrades and improvements throughout the build.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism about the vehicle's resale history and interior color changes. @cumminsmj questions the abrupt color shift and the background reason for the vehicle being relisted after a successful auction. @superfluous seeks clarification on how the interior was re-finished from orange to brown, raising concerns about the dye's durability and potential transfer to clothing. While most feedback on the vehicle is positive, this curiosity reflects a desire for transparency regarding modifications that could impact the buyer's experience.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight a great appreciation for the vehicle's interior color and condition, with several enthusiasts expressing admiration for its aesthetic appeal. @cj11 reminisced about admiring the car back in 2024 and noted the seller's significant investment in maintenance and repairs over the past year. @esixty and @the_rice_kid praised the stunning interior, while others recognized the vehicle's handling capabilities and reliability at higher speeds. Enthusiasts like @jefFJ80 shared past positive experiences with similar models, reinforcing the car's desirability.
Neutral: The seller, @tlipcsey, provided detailed insights into the car's maintenance history, addressing inquiries about past ownership and clarifying potential misconceptions related to the number of previous owners. They confirmed that all necessary fluids were serviced except for the transmission and rear end, which is due later in the vehicle's lifecycle. Additionally, the seller clarified that there have been no oil-related issues, addressing comments from potential buyers concerned about common engine problems associated with age and mileage. They maintained transparency about minor details such as a loose headliner and the clarity of the vehicle's condition without any signs of transmission leaks.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about specific issues, such as the infamous N62 valve stem seal problem, with @esixty asking for a demonstration to assure potential buyers about oil smoke from the tailpipe. Although the seller assured that there has been no oil smoke or leaks, skepticism remained due to the vehicle's age. A question from @BallCoach about potential interior odors highlighted concerns about the car's interior history, which the seller quickly dismissed by confirming no odors were present. Overall, while the comments reflect an underlying caution regarding long-term reliability, the significant investment in maintenance help assuage some worries.
|
 |
Positive: @39mercman describes the vehicle as 'Stunning,' praising the beauty of the build and the appealing nail head engine. @loggdon also admires the overall beauty, expressing love for the classy color while suggesting the stainless gas tank would look better painted. @gogounou calls the Nailhead engine 'art' and @VintageSteelBoy appreciates the impressive design choices, including the unique tail light placement and the brushed gas tank's balance with the chromed front end.
Neutral: @911r (The Seller) provides a driving video of the car and confirms with @Zano that it is titled in Oregon as a 1932 Ford. Commenters discuss the vehicle's features, with @Chevfvr and @RedGTvert mentioning potential dealer fees in a positive light. @mike_rockwell reflects on the limited mileage since the car was built and shares insights from previous sales that could aid potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the overall admiration, @loggdon is not fond of the stainless gas tank and suggests it should be painted, while @Mercury_Man critiques the gas tank design, referring to it as 'loaded Diaper' and expressing disappointment that it hides the quick change. @Greybeard2 is also critical, suggesting that the oversized gas tank is unnecessary for a hot rod, stating that long-distance driving isn't typical for such vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @Pauly1119 (The Seller) highlights the truck's exceptional condition, noting that the new GM long block and rebuilt transmission have under 1,000 miles. He emphasizes its reliability for daily use and points out that the truck drives like new, with all rubber components on the suspension being brand new, resulting in no squeaks on rough roads. Additionally, he mentions that the entire AC system is brand new, and the interior is one of the nicest he has seen in an OBS, even remarking on its 'new truck' smell. Commenters like @DUGEEEFRESH04 and @KatManDew also praise the truck's cleanliness, good looks, and well-done interior, with @KatManDew expressing excitement about the potential LT4 build and recommending the truck to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters engage with @Pauly1119's insights, with @BostonFrank inquiring about the bed size and @KatManDew noting the quality of the color combination and stance. The conversation reveals shared enthusiasm for the truck's aesthetic and functional attributes, with many acknowledging its timeless design. @Penleya, however, raises a question regarding a mileage discrepancy mentioned in the listing, prompting @Pauly1119 to clarify that due to the truck's age, the title states mileage exempt, while highlighting that virtually all moving parts have been replaced or rebuilt, making the truck feel nearly new.
Negative: Although the feedback about the truck is largely positive, @Penleya's comment regarding the mileage discrepancy introduces a slight concern about transparency in the vehicle's history. Despite @Pauly1119's attempts to address this by explaining the age-related mileage exemption and detailing the maintenance that has been done, it suggests that potential buyers may want extra clarity on the vehicle's history before making a purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @39mercman praised the vehicle's performance, specifically noting that it can comfortably run at 70 mph thanks to modifications like the Tremic 5-speed and Heights independent front suspension. @Dexandsqueak expressed admiration for the truck, calling it beautiful and suggesting a practical use for it on their property. @RSchul also shared enthusiasm, wishing they could bid on the truck if they had the financial means.
Neutral: @mainlymusclecars (The Seller) provided information about the truck's history, mentioning it has remained in the owner's family for over 65 years and detailing its restoration process. They also addressed various inquiries from potential buyers about the vehicle's condition, including its 12-volt electrical system and storage history since the restoration. Comments also raised questions about specific components, such as the axle and brake condition, showing a desire for detailed information.
Negative: Several commenters voiced concerns and requested additional information regarding the truck's condition. @meh60, @1906loco, and @G.M.-TECH asked about the engine's upkeep, possible rust issues, and whether the truck still had its original six-volt system. @mike_rockwell pointed out inconsistencies in the photographic representation of the bumpers, while @KawaZmoto noted apparent imperfections in the tailgate, requesting further clarification on any similar issues elsewhere on the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the Mercedes-Benz Unimog 404 highlight its charm and character. @Engineer1guy noted its clean look, while @hoob loved the unique extras included, especially the cowbell on the front. Various commenters expressed enthusiasm, with @boaboyoz calling it the coolest thing currently on BaT, and @CKKurtz appreciating its well-preserved condition. Many praised the seller, @Carkeyologist, for their care and attention to detail in maintaining the vehicle, contributing to a sales experience that feels personal and engaging. @tlcamg even suggested a go fund me for another fan to acquire it, showcasing the communal admiration for this special vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters asked specific questions about the Unimog's practicalities and features. @davidb72 was curious about its size compared to a modern F150, while @Spindler and @tlcamg queried about its performance, particularly top speed and highway usability. The seller responded with detailed insights about the vehicle, including its loading capacity and a thorough overview of its features and maintenance history, providing a clear picture of what potential buyers can expect. This exchange underscored the vehicle's unique attributes and the seller's dedication to sharing knowledge about the Unimog.
Negative: On the downside, there were mentions of practicality concerns, with @leandroflaherty warning that the Unimog is not a replacement for a modern vehicle like the F150 due to its limited highway performance and engine power. There were also inquiries about modifications and potential wear on parts, indicating that while its character is appreciated, some potential buyers are cautious about its ride quality and utility for everyday use. However, these comments were often overshadowed by the overall positive vibe surrounding the vehicle, indicating that while concerns exist, they do not detract significantly from the vehicle's allure.
|
38-Years-Owned 1969 Chevrolet Chevelle Malibu Sport Coupe Roller Project
131379K449113
Lot 200667
Private Party
 |
Positive: @rbf120 finds the vehicle an interesting project with known history and believes the hardest work has been done, encouraging potential buyers to choose their dream drivetrain. @Rpharesjr expresses that it will be a fun build for someone and is curious to see its progress in four months. @coloradodave sees it as a great opportunity to get started in bracket racing with the addition of an engine and transmission.
Neutral: @AC2000 (The Seller) provides clear communication regarding inquiries about viewing the vehicle and shares that an aftermarket sunroof was removed from the car, stating that the work appears to have been done correctly. Multiple commentors, including @5567Mike, express interest in additional details and pictures, with @AC2000 being responsive to their requests. @Damaged1 initially questioned the VIN but quickly clarified understanding after reviewing the listing more closely.
Negative: @IdahoRob points out potential issues with bodywork based on the vehicle's condition, suggesting there may be repairs visible at the lower front fenders. @L8842767's vague comment implies disappointment, while @Valkyrja reflects on their difficult experience trying to sell a similar project in the past, hinting at the challenges involved in marketing such vehicles. Overall, concerns about the vehicle's condition and clarity on details seem to linger among some commenters.
|
 |
Positive: @MisterClassic (The Seller) expresses his fondness for the 2023 Camaro 2LT, noting the immaculate condition and low mileage of just under 6k, which preserves that new car smell. Commenters like @cadigti highlight the car's excellent value and impressive specifications, suggesting that it represents a steal given its original MSRP. Enthusiasts such as @Mongoose55 appreciate the underrated performance of the turbo 4 Camaros, recalling how far automotive technology has come, while @MisterClassic confirms its enjoyable driving experience and the car's pristine state, having never been smoked in.
Neutral: Comments reflect curiosity about the car's features. @Eriz asks specific questions regarding the limited slip differentiation and any visible imperfections, while @Wjhpc inquires about the effectiveness of the air conditioning under hot conditions. The seller, @MisterClassic, addresses these inquiries proactively, confirming the car's high-quality features and recent maintenance, including inspection and recall fixes performed by a local Chevy dealership.
Negative: There are no particularly negative comments on the vehicle, although @gf2020 expresses surprise at the availability of a 4-cylinder manual transmission Camaro, indicating a lack of awareness about this trim. Overall, the sentiment from the community appears overwhelmingly positive, with no major complaints or red flags raised in the discussion.
|
 |
Positive: @Aph82 expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's Emberglo color, calling it outstanding, and shared their excitement about following the car's sale. @pmjb1963 (The Seller) provided detailed information about the car's condition and history, reassuring interested buyers about its maintenance and storage. The seller has been careful with the vehicle, driving it only in suitable conditions and maintaining it well over the years.
Neutral: Several commenters asked specific questions regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @Slb0151 inquired about the condition of the torque boxes, while @Oaks questioned whether the car would be DOT certified and mentioned necessary repairs, including tires and a top. @pmjb1963 (The Seller) responded to these queries clearly, mentioning that the vehicle had not been driven in salted conditions, that it is planned to be sold as is, and provided updates about the torque boxes with accompanying photos.
Negative: @Oaks raised concerns about the car's age and potential issues, suggesting the need for new tires, a steering pump, and more, which might indicate underlying problems with the vehicle. @Oaks and others showed skepticism about the condition of the tires and the top, raising doubts about whether the vehicle would be safe or fully functional as is. Furthermore, @lwg8tr0514 hinted at potential issues with the car's sale history, questioning why it hadn't sold previously.
|
 |
Positive: @cjs66Mustang finds the vehicle very cool, praising its aesthetics. @Oakhurst notes that the Art Morrison chassis suggests a high-quality build, indicating that it is not a budget project. @pigman expresses a desire to own and drive the vehicle, appreciating the unique qualities it possesses, particularly the Art Morrison chassis. @rgpiatt reminisces fondly about owning a similar vehicle, highlighting its cruising ability and functionality.
Neutral: @SLRitter raises multiple questions about the vehicle, inquiring about its steering tracking, source of rattles, and whether its engine or transmission incorporates microprocessors. The seller, @blacklake, replies to these inquiries, assuring that the vehicle drives and tracks very well and providing further details regarding the vehicle's engine specifications and handling at freeway speeds. @wheels8 asks about fuel tank capacity and fuel specifications, which the seller confirms are 19 gallons and compatible with regular octane gas.
Negative: @SLRitter expresses concerns regarding the presence of rattles that would be bothersome during driving. @ccpanel presents a series of critical questions and observations about the vehicle, suggesting a detailed examination is needed regarding its rear axle ratio, floor repairs, and overall condition. @ccpanel also raises concerns about the paint quality and potential rust issues, asking for visual confirmations to ensure the vehicle's integrity.
|
 |
Positive: @mgardner2366 describes the car as beautiful, highlighting its fabulous color combination, and shows enthusiasm about its features. Additionally, @Collectibleclassics emphasizes their commitment to smooth and transparent transactions with a high rating from customers, showcasing their dedication to high-quality service. They also provide practical information for potential buyers, including visitation hours and inspection options, which adds to the positive engagement.
Neutral: @GordonN raises a clarifying point regarding the color of the vehicle, noting a discrepancy between the description of Brilliant Silver and Diamond Silver. This indicates a neutral observation that may require further clarification and reflects on the importance of accurate listing details. The discussion between commentors suggests an open dialogue about the specifics of the vehicle being sold.
Negative: @Collectibleclassics responds to @mgardner2366's inquiry about the car's telephone system by indicating that there may not be any features beyond what is listed, projecting a lack of capability that some buyers may find disappointing. This response suggests limitations in the vehicle's modern functionalities that could be a concern for potential buyers seeking the latest technology in their vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @ranforctop80 expressed hope for a successful second round of bidding, while @ExclusiveMotorClub highlighted the reliability and road-worthiness of the 1983 Toyota Land Cruiser FJ60, which had recently journeyed from California to Arizona without issues. They emphasized the vehicle's character and capability, encouraging potential buyers to bid with confidence. Additionally, @Cruisermorgan's comment reflected enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting its appealing black color and connecting it to Henry Ford's legacy, which underlines a positive perception of its design.
Neutral: @JasonC. praised the auction format, appreciating that it was a real auction with no reserve, which suggests a fair bidding opportunity. @UZJObsessed provided useful information about the "G" logo on the side of the vehicle, explaining its tie to the trim level specific to the Venezuelan market, while also noting the nuances of trim variations across different regions. @seansilvera and @exhaustsucker asked clarifying questions about the car's registration history and status of the chassis, indicating a curiosity for the vehicle's background and condition.
Negative: @ContSp68 expressed disappointment that their previous offer was not accepted, hinting at potential frustrations surrounding the auction process. @RS-7 inquired about the vehicle’s upgrades and refurbishments, possibly suggesting concerns about its current state and history. Additionally, @3rdgeneration's multiple questions regarding the functioning of the A/C, heat, lift installation, and component conditions indicate a cautious approach from potential buyers seeking assurance about the vehicle's overall quality and maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's aesthetic and functionality, with @Caymanorcarrera highlighting features like the brown door cards and original bumperettes, calling it 'super tidy for a '73.' @Plumber (The Seller) provided detailed insights, noting the car's unique attributes as one of the last 'long hood' air-cooled models made for the US market and its maintenance history, which includes recent work on various mechanical components. Overall, the community showed appreciation for the vehicle's potential and design.
Neutral: Several users raised questions about the vehicle's details and logistics, such as @rgupta250 inquiring about the specific type of Webers installed, and @KWNCan wanting to know the seller's location in Ontario to arrange a viewing. @Tommyrot777 prompted discussions about the effect of color change on value, while @sliproc and @Plumber (The Seller) provided valuable perspectives on what qualifies a vehicle as a 'project.' Such discussions indicate a collaborative atmosphere around understanding the car's condition and market value.
Negative: However, there were some concerns noted, particularly from @Tommyrot777 about the potential complications of shipping the car from Canada to the US due to past experiences. This viewpoint reflects a cautionary stance regarding such transactions, resulting in his hesitance to proceed further. Additionally, issues around the car's condition were raised, such as surface rust mentioned by @Plumber (The Seller), showing that while many were excited, there remained underlying worries about the vehicle's overall state and the implications of its project classification.
|
 |
Positive: The 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL450 is described by @DEAUTOSINC (The Seller) as a solid and well-maintained SUV ready for its next adventure. It has been a reliable family vehicle boasting a smooth ride and a powerful V8 engine, along with being loaded with features. The seller emphasizes that this vehicle is clean and comes with no stories, highlighting the professional servicing that it has recently undergone to ensure its excellent condition. They express a sense of excitement for bidders, indicating that someone will soon take home this SUV in great shape.
Neutral: @caglar raised a concern about the vehicle's height adjustment feature, noting that the seller turned off the height adjustment before the car was fully raised, which prevented them from seeing how long it takes for the car to rise completely. Additionally, @caglar suggested that a video showing the lowering function would be beneficial. In response, @DEAUTOSINC provided transparency by uploading a new video demonstrating that all options and features of the vehicle are operational, indicating openness to addressing potential buyers' inquiries about the SUV's functionality.
Negative: There were concerns regarding the functionality of the height adjustment feature, as noted by @caglar who felt that the demonstration was incomplete due to the timing of the video's recording. This raised questions about the vehicle's operational capabilities, showcasing a potential issue that could affect a buyer's confidence in the vehicle's performance. Though the seller acknowledged the feedback and sought to clarify the situation, it indicates an area of uncertainty for potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @Shedlockmotorcars provided helpful details about the vehicle, reassuring potential buyers that the soft top is included and in like-new condition. They also expressed pride in the quality of the restoration, noting that the previous owner had put a lot of love into the truck. Commenters like @Fitzroya highlighted the original condition of the top, suggesting that it was in excellent shape, while @arlesblue90 reminisced about their own positive experience with a similar vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions about the vehicle's condition, including @WabAZ who inquired about the implications of a rebuilt title on pricing. @VincentB4 and @onedaydream requested further details regarding any rust, the vehicle's functionality, and its title history. @Shedlockmotorcars addressed many of these inquiries, indicating that the vehicle was functioning well and had been carefully stored, while noting the challenges of obtaining specific historical details about the title and mileage.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's physical state, particularly related to the hood and front end alignment. @Defender90NAS pointed out issues with the hood not latching and bodywork appearance, which @onedaydream echoed in their request for clarification. Additionally, @SMB550's comment, though vague, hinted at potential dissatisfaction with the overall quality. This indicates that while the restoration was appreciated, skepticism regarding certain functional aspects remains among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's attractive features, particularly its color combination, which @gscharnagl describes as "a quintessential color combination for an MB convertible! a beauty!" @MaxTork4me reinforces this sentiment by calling the car's colors "very nice." @KP777 commends the vehicle's condition, stating it is in "beautiful shape," while also wishing the best for the seller and new buyer. The seller, @Premierautofl, assures potential buyers that the heated, ventilated, and massage features in the seats are functioning properly, which adds to the luxury experience of the car. Moreover, @cvg123 praises the car as an "Icon" built by Mercedes-Benz, noting its powerful performance and the enjoyable driving experience it provides.
Neutral: Several inquiries revolve around the vehicle's history and servicing, with @swp423 and @gscharnagl leading the charge with probing questions regarding the oil changes and service records, indicating a potential gap in historical servicing. @Premierautofl, the seller, provides responses, confirming the current oil service is due and that some historical servicing records were provided by the previous owner. There's a request for paint meter readings and commentary on the vehicle's mileage, suggesting that while the car has low mileage, its service history raises some concerns. The discussion reflects a general curiosity and expectation for transparency from the seller regarding the car's past maintenance.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's past servicing are prevalent, with @swp423 emphasizing that the oil changes and necessary services may not have been performed regularly. @swp423 points out that just a few oil changes over a 12-year period is likely insufficient and suggests that attention is needed for the vehicle to stay in good condition. @gscharnagl also expresses desire for service records, acknowledging a personal gap in service records from 2013 to 2017. @Premierautofl mentions existing scratches under the front bumper, which may detract from the vehicle's overall elegance and could raise questions about how the car was treated by previous owners.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's beauty and condition. @gravytrain9 found it stunning and noted his surprise that it didn't sell previously. @Espanolie described it as a great-looking 3.3 turbo in proper condition with impressive collector miles, while @Dadster praised its rarity with one of the lowest mileages available for this model. Other comments like @MidnightRambler10's and @Leftand-up's simply conveyed their excitement and appreciation for the 1989 Porsche 911 Turbo Coupe, emphasizing its aesthetic appeal as a gorgeous car.
Neutral: Several comments reflected a mix of curiosity and predictions about the auction outcome. @no.radar and @outlaw77 speculated on bid amounts, with opinions on whether it would exceed previous estimates. Meanwhile, @Caymanorcarrera raised a question about protocol for cars returning after a no-sale while acknowledging the fun of watching the auction unfold. Additionally, @curated inquired about maintenance details, which the seller, @1600veloce, promptly addressed, showcasing transparency in the transaction process.
Negative: Some comments pointed out potential downsides or personal preferences regarding the vehicle. @hector13 suggested that the car could achieve a higher value with a different interior color, while @galevin anticipated that the Porsche would exceed $241k but acknowledged that collector interest can be unpredictable. @SJBOTT mentioned that while it’s a rare gem, it needs some cleaning underneath, which hints at possible concerns regarding its overall upkeep. These indications suggest that while the car is admired, there are nuanced opinions on its perfection.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and historical significance. @robertb1958 noted that it 'looks nice!' while @2002WS6 described it as 'too much fun.' @BloodyHell emphasized its allure, calling it one of the best-looking muscle cars of all time, and @helijh reminisced about seeing it on BAT previously, appreciating its beauty. @Mychordistooshort hailed it as a 'beauty' and numerous commenters agreed on its classic appeal, with @Habu2 and @bkrug acknowledging the timeless attraction and rarity of the model. Overall, the comments reflect a strong appreciation for its design, with many seeing it as a desired collector's item.
Neutral: Some commenters took a more analytical approach, discussing the car's features and condition with a focus on potential flaws. @proaero raised valid concerns about the paint and interior, asking for a detailed description of any imperfections, while @Royce59 noted the challenges of repainting and restoring parts of the vehicle. @MMJ614 (The Seller) responded to questions about the car's history and condition, offering reassurances about the external and internal state of the vehicle. Comments also included inquiries about specific features, such as the functional hood scoop and the presence of the original carburetor. Overall, the neutral comments tended toward practical concerns regarding restoration and maintenance.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding alterations made to the vehicle, particularly the interior color change from blue to black. @DCcardshark expressed disappointment at the lack of the original blue interior, which was echoed by @Jay_Gibbs and @8tony, with the latter arguing that the interior change detracted from the car's value. @kevinckb6 mentioned disbelief over its pricing, leading to some humorous discussions about its perceived worth, with varying opinions on whether the investment was justified due to modifications and restoration needs. These comments indicate that while many recognize the vehicle's desirability, there are significant reservations among potential buyers regarding its altered features and pricing.
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) describes the 2007 CLK350 as a remarkable vehicle, emphasizing that it drives exceptionally well, has a tight suspension, cold AC, and a powerful engine without any balance shaft issues. The seller expresses confidence in the car's condition, calling it gorgeous and highlighting its functionality. Additionally, @Collectibleclassics provides transparency about their business processes, showcasing their high customer satisfaction ratings and inviting potential buyers to inspect the vehicle or reach out for logistics support.
Neutral: @Wjhpc humorously notes the influx of CLK cabs on the auction site, while @Krlang inquires about a sticker on the windshield indicating that the vehicle is not for sale. @Collectibleclassics clarifies that the sticker is a temporary requirement until a Buyer's Guide is placed, assuring @Krlang that it will be removed before proper sale photos. Furthermore, @E-TypeOTS brings up the significant balance shaft issue associated with certain Mercedes engines, seeking confirmation from the seller regarding the engine number to verify if this vehicle is affected.
Negative: @johnS2000 expresses concern about unusual creaking noises when the vehicle comes to a stop, questioning whether such sounds are normal for the car. @Eagleace also brings up the potential balance shaft issues, reflecting apprehension about the model year associated with these concerns. These comments signal a level of skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition despite the seller's assurances.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, with @duhpeezee appreciating its appearance and @car.fanatic noting it might have an overdrive feature, indicating its potential for driving enjoyment. @wadds71 shared a personal connection to the car's history, highlighting the interesting original color scheme and design features of the seats, signaling high interest among vintage car enthusiasts. Additionally, @mehdizadeh remarked on the car's impressive mechanical condition, stating that it runs and drives well without requiring extensive work.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarifications about the vehicle's features and history. @abernethy and @Lewis questioned the low mileage of only 1,000 since 1994, prompting inquiries about the vehicle's overall condition and potential history. @Capt._Doug and @SSBN629 engaged in discussions about specific features like the overdrive functionality and bumper designs, reflecting a general curiosity among commenters while providing insights into the vehicle's design variations over the years.
Negative: Concerns about the car's structural integrity were raised by @smitty122, who questioned the amount of bodywork done before its recent painting. Issues related to the fuel tank design were also brought to light by @ebrand, @Capt._Doug, and @vintage_volvo, with warnings about the potential design flaws leading to fuel contamination. Additionally, many commenters expressed a need for clear documentation of the vehicle's past repair work and evolution, indicating skepticism about its maintenance history and transparency from the seller.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is praised for its pristine condition and low mileage, with @GenauAutoWerks noting it is the cleanest 2007 Honda S2000 they have ever sold. Several commenters, including @lounge2fly and @rickmnsx, expressed admiration for the car's beauty and repair quality, remarking on the gorgeous red color and mint condition. Enthusiastic fans, like @binderdundat, shared their positive experiences with the S2000 line, emphasizing the car's reliability, driveability, and potential as a worthwhile investment.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification about details concerning the vehicle, such as @jfdahlen inquiring whether the seller is a private party or dealer, and @Ewok13 commenting on the alignment of the front bumper and fender. Questions also arose regarding the oil filter mentioned in relation to the vehicle's service, with @Batfan2 highlighting the importance of using proper OEM parts. Additionally, there was discussion about the tire pressure monitoring system (TPMS) as @johnduh pointed out inconsistencies about its availability in the model year.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the vehicle's history, including @z32luvr requesting pictures of the reported damage from the run-in with the deer, and @trevellyan seeking clarification on whether the right or left fender was replaced. @Ewok13 pointed out potential misalignment issues, and @johnduh sought further clarification on the TPMS mention, suggesting possible inaccuracies in the seller's information. These comments reflect a cautious approach from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's past and current condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Johnny1eye commented positively about the SUV, appreciating its overall appearance, while @Sm82 provided useful information about the Range Rover's P525 model, sharing their own experience with a similar vehicle. @nyc201us expressed interest in a new lease for their wife, finding the current Range Rover appealing among the different models they considered. The Seller, 2FAM, also highlighted the luxury features of the Range Rover, such as heated and ventilated seats and a high-quality sound system, which conveyed the vehicle's premium status to potential buyers.
Neutral: @2FAM, The Seller, clarified the pricing of the vehicle and addressed comments from potential buyers, providing details regarding service and maintenance, including the replacement of three tires before their ownership. They also reassured @SNSTR about a potential issue with moisture on the chrome trim, explaining it was simply condensation. Furthermore, they responded to a question from @ewolynec concerning paint wear and addressed concerns regarding flickering lights on the vehicle's screens, explaining that it was due to camera synchronization.
Negative: @chevymen21 raised a concern about only three tires being replaced, questioning the maintenance quality, while @bradcooke1968 noted potential issues with flickering images on the steering wheel and console in the displayed video. Additionally, there was a query from @Antonelli regarding pitting on the aluminum trim, raising further doubts about the vehicle's condition. Some commenters expressed skepticism about the bidding process, indicating frustration with how bidding dynamics have changed.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and unique features. @Bibendum5 notes the original white cloth top as a special aspect, stating it must have looked stunning. @Dr.T appreciates the '69 specific details, indicating its rarity, while @Ricklandia calls it a bucket list car for collectors of British sports cars, emphasizing its striking appearance. @maggie70 is also taken by the rare white top and the car's overall aesthetics, suggesting that it must look impressive on the road. @LeeXray, usually not a fan of white cars, admits this one stands out and shows signs of being well-loved and actively driven, which adds to its charm.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the car's specifications and performance aspects, with users seeking additional information. @WYW inquires about the mentioned small leaks, demonstrating interest in the car's condition. @LATR6 requests a driving video to see its performance in action, while @dzguy suggests that the seller engage with the community and answer questions to facilitate the sale. Comments from @rebarlowva and @mgeoff touch on the vehicle's history and factory options regarding the soft top, pointing out how the white top was a special order, which may be of interest to potential buyers. These inquiries show a balanced curiosity about the vehicle's condition and background.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the vehicle's condition and features. @WYW questions the small leaks mentioned, suggesting there may be issues that need to be addressed. @rebarlowva also asks about potential rust around the rear light boxes, indicating hesitation for buyers who might be worried about the car's maintenance or restoration needs. @agitpop and @Dr.T engage in a discussion regarding the uniqueness of the rear fender beading, implying confusion or doubt about its authenticity. Overall, while there is strong appreciation for the car's aesthetics, there are lingering questions about its mechanical condition.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @FBCB describing it as a "bad boy" with an appealing look. @Denniec considered the truck a "rowdy hot rod" rather than a street rod, indicating that the rough-looking interior could be seen as a positive characteristic. @jefbel1979 showed love for these trucks and noted the satisfaction of having Chevy engines in Ford bodies, while @Flick2JZ appreciated the vehicle's visual appeal and expressed a desire to see how it feels to sit in one.
Neutral: Some feedback was more neutral, primarily seeking clarification on certain aspects of the vehicle. @stoneskid inquired about window switches, demonstrating curiosity about features that were not immediately visible. @WGardner89 (The Seller) responded by noting the switches are located under the dash, and also provided additional details about the cam used and the paint. While some comments acknowledged the vehicle's need for some work, they seemed more aimed at understanding the vehicle than criticizing it.
Negative: Negative critiques predominantly focused on the condition of the interior. @Chuckinnj and @pigman both described the interior as "shabby and sloppy," with @pigman suggesting possible exposure to adverse conditions that may have impacted its quality. @john_chamorro expressed dissatisfaction with the choice of placing a Chevy engine in a Ford build, highlighting a common theme in the comments where some users criticized the modifications instead of appreciating the overall build. Additionally, @danljeff remarked on the negativity commonly found in auction site comments, questioning the qualifications of those critiquing the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Superbert (The Seller) describes the 2002 Lexus SC430 as a fabulous car, highlighting its luxurious history and recent upgrades, which enhance its allure. @Scobee1210 praises the car's reliability, low maintenance, and strong performance, referring to it as a "nimble tank" and appreciating its quietness both with the roof up and down. Additionally, @lindbrosracing notes the vehicle's striking appearance with its classic color scheme and upgraded wheels, while @Bond001 and @HughR agree on the car's timeless styling and reliable performance, emphasizing the compliments it garners.
Neutral: The seller, @Superbert, provides a detailed history of the SC430, noting that it has had three owners with a modest mileage increase over the years. Comments mention the practicality of usage, particularly that the car may be more suited for singles due to limited trunk space and back seat capacity. @DickMc asks about adding XM radio capabilities, reflecting curiosity about modernizing the vehicle despite its classic nature.
Negative: There were no significant negative comments regarding the 2002 Lexus SC430 in the discussion. Instead, any concerns raised were primarily about personal preferences or inquiries about features, such as the request for original wheels or XM radio integration. Overall impressions were overwhelmingly positive, with users sharing their satisfaction and admiration for the car.
|
 |
Positive: @johnny2g (The Seller) emphasizes that the Jeep is in remarkable condition, both inside and out. He mentions that the A/C is operational and blows ice cold, enhancing the driving experience. Additionally, he notes that the tires may give an impression of the Jeep being lifted, but assures that it is not actually lifted. @johnny2g also describes the fun of driving the vehicle and confirms that it has been a pleasure to own, as he has had several similar vehicles in the past, which he has enjoyed greatly.
Neutral: @eggsalad points out an interesting fact regarding the vehicle's history, highlighting its 20 years and 7 different owners, suggesting an unusual longevity in terms of the number of owners per mileage. @johnny2g addresses this by explaining that it is common for Jeep vehicles to have multiple owners, as they are often not used as everyday vehicles. He also clarifies some questions about the Jeep's half doors by explaining that they were from his previous vehicle and must be painted to match, while also mentioning that shipping options are disabled due to these doors being included with the sale.
Negative: @DerkPerk raises some concerns by querying about the Jeep's A/C functionality and whether there is a soft top included, which @johnny2g confirms is not present. He also asks if there were any body modifications done to accommodate the aftermarket tail lights, to which @johnny2g reassures that no modifications were made. Lastly, @jvandeven questions the reason for selling so soon after acquiring the vehicle, hinting at potential red flags, but @johnny2g explains that he simply doesn't use the Jeep enough to justify keeping it.
|
 |
Positive: @De3de8 praised Audi for their vehicle dynamics, particularly noting the balance of the V8 engine placement. @SuperCarsLLC highlighted the modified Audi S5 Cabriolet as an extraordinary vehicle, mentioning its perfect modifications that enhance the drive, sound, and comfort. This seller pointed out that the car provides a great balance of performance and luxury, emphasizing the engineering behind Audi's 4.2L V8 and its impressive features.
Neutral: @fiirmoth inquired about the timing chain guides, indicating concern for the vehicle's maintenance history. @davidbittner requested videos of the vehicle starting and driving, which @SuperCarsLLC confirmed would be posted later. @SuperCarsLLC introduced their company and discussed their commitment to high-quality German cars, detailing the car's specifications and the tasteful modifications that have been made to enhance it.
Negative: Concerns arose from comments about potential existing issues, with @fiirmoth specifically wondering about the status of the timing chain guides. @SuperCarsLLC noted the regular servicing and emissions status of the vehicle but acknowledged slight cosmetic imperfections such as curb rash and scuffs. This transparency regarding minor flaws contrasts with the otherwise positive reviews of the S5's performance and modifications.
|
 |
Positive: The Aston Martin V8 Vantage is receiving praise for its stunning look and impressive low mileage, with @OldPorscheCar highlighting the appealing tungsten silver paint that makes it a head-turner. Commenters like @TurboLagIsForeplay express admiration for the car's overall beauty, describing it as a 'lovely car'. @Cal73 expresses appreciation for the thoroughness of the seller, calling them a 'total professional', and remarks on the car's good miles and elegant colors. @SeaTacTom further echoes this by noting the understated nature of the vehicle and adding that its features, such as the three pedals, enhance its desirability.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding maintenance records and the car's history, particularly surrounding its repossession in 2019. @F117 asks about additional maintenance records, to which @OldPorscheCar responds that no major services have been performed under current ownership beyond oil changes. Questions about the availability of the second key fob were raised by @Fore, and @YorksAH wanted clarity on the last service date, indicating that the car was last serviced in March 2024. The discussions also touched upon the specifications and options related to the car, with @Speedraser questioning the authenticity of the Monroney window sticker.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the vehicle's condition, especially regarding the dashboard leather and its history. @Strohmk questioned a potential missing piece of leather on the dash, while others like @Speedraser noted the need for clarity regarding the quality and potential repairs needed for the dashboard leather, which is known to shrink in hot climates. Doubts regarding the car's accident history were expressed as well, with @Strohmk inquiring about paint thickness and possible overspray. @Sunoco260 raised apprehension about the implications of the car's repossession situation, asking for detailed explanations about the history to ensure transparency.
|
 |
Positive: @Sam1905's 997 is praised for its timeless design and well-maintained condition. Commenters such as @DHD997 and @boaboyoz express their admiration for the car's aesthetics, particularly its Carrara White color, which many believe enhances its visual appeal. The modifications made, including the FISTER exhaust setup, received positive remarks for improving the driving experience without compromising on quality. Additionally, the car's history and maintenance record, detailed by @Sam1905, reflect a genuine passion for the vehicle, which resonates well with car enthusiasts in the comments who appreciate careful ownership.
Neutral: Several comments provide practical inquiries about the car's condition and mechanical aspects. @Oh_two_Fanatic and others focus on the reported bore score and IMS bearing concerns associated with this generation of 911s, reflecting common buyer apprehensions. However, @Sam1905 reassures potential buyers by highlighting improvements made to the car, including the installation of a larger IMS bearing and addressing minor maintenance items. Conversations also touch on details such as tire condition, interior squeaks, and the history of the vehicle, indicating keen interest among participants in the auction.
Negative: While the overall sentiment is positive, there are some concerns raised by commenters. @sbleu notes that the exhaust tips appear misaligned in some photos, prompting @Sam1905 to address the issue transparently. Additionally, @dangerisland and @jaga1956 mention potential performance issues related to the steering and bearing concerns that have historically affected similar models. Although @Sam1905 does his best to address these issues, the need for certain maintenance tasks, like brake pad replacements, is brought up by @jgfuller75, which may give some potential bidders pause.
|
 |
Positive: @Vic (The Seller) describes the Porsche 911 as absolutely stunning with a beautiful color combination and mentions that numerous improvements have been made since the previous auction, assuring potential buyers that the car is currently in excellent condition. @OlyTrees echoes this sentiment, noting the gorgeous appearance of the car and suggesting that these vehicles look good in any color. Furthermore, @vidoeskatel commends the white color on the vehicle, reinforcing its aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Several comments raise queries about the vehicle's mechanics, indicating some uncertainty among potential buyers. @RexKars points out a potential discrepancy in the photos which may indicate the car's rare dual-engine feature, suggesting a need for clarity. @omnipotentdude and @BFR2 express concerns over mismatched tires and alignment issues, while @nonametotell notes the car's mileage and previous maintenance, emphasizing the importance of being handy or financially prepared as an owner of an older vehicle.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition and repairs were raised by various commentators. @Btyrrel1 questions the authenticity of the improvements listed by @Vic (The Seller) and wonders about unsecured parts like the center console and mismatched tires. @red_sled criticizes the choice to perform an alignment with such a variety of tire brands, implying that this choice could impact performance and safety. @nonametotell also mentions potential future expenses related to components like the suspension and water pump, highlighting the costs of owning an older model.
|
2020 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 3500 Midwest Automotive Designs Ultimate Limo
W1X5EDHY7LT022699
Lot 200697
Dealer
 |
Positive: @bkprimos commented on the vehicle, calling it a 'Very nice Sprinter,' which suggests a strong positive impression of its overall design and appeal. This indicates that the vehicle likely meets aesthetic and functional expectations for potential buyers.
Neutral: @choicedealsnc2017 (The Seller) provided specific details about the vehicle, confirming that there are a total of 10 seatbelts (2 in the front and 8 in the back) and clarifying that this particular build does not include a toilet in the rear. This informative response helps to answer prospective buyers' queries while maintaining an objective stance.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments about the vehicle in the provided exchanges. However, @RMoffett's inquiry about the seatbelts might imply concerns regarding the vehicle's capacity and safety features.
|
 |
Positive: @CARAGENTS (The Seller) assures that the vehicle is a one-owner car and has been verified with updated title information to reflect accurate mileage. The car is reported to be in excellent condition with a smooth SMG shifting system and a pleasant exhaust note. The seller also notes that the original coil springs are available and can be included for the new owner, highlighting the overall quality of the vehicle and its components.
Neutral: Several buyers asked pertinent questions about specific features and characteristics of the car, including concerns about handling on speed bumps and the fit of the aftermarket carbon hood. The seller provided clarifications regarding the car's height adjustments with the provided springs and confirmed that the car comes with a carbon roof option by default. Potential buyers expressed curiosity about the vehicle's past, particularly about the ownership history reflected on the Carfax report, and the condition of the rod bearings.
Negative: Some comments indicated concerns about the fitment of the aftermarket hood, expressing that there are noticeable panel gaps and poor alignment, which could detract from the car's overall appearance. The criticism included remarks about the hood's quality, with one user calling the fitment 'rough' despite appreciating the car's overall aesthetic. Additionally, a question about the original rod bearings remains unanswered, leaving some uncertainty about the vehicle's mechanical history.
|
 |
Positive: @CRUSH praised the vehicle, expressing enthusiasm for driving it to car events, while @Rowdyroyce appreciated the themed month featured on the BaT platform, describing it as awesome. @SndManStv was impressed with the truck's looks and functionality, stating it checks all the boxes, and @JLsKA510 found the rig cool, even humorously suggesting the steering wheel could use carbon dating. The seller, @niko12, expressed gratitude for the kind comments and promised to engage with potential buyers by answering their questions honestly.
Neutral: Several users asked practical questions about the vehicle. @Indiepants noted the side rails and inquired about the presence of locking hubs, to which @niko12 confirmed that the Power Wagon has lockout hubs and promised additional photos and videos to showcase its 4WD functionality. He also stated that an owner's manual and other documentation would accompany the sale to aid buyers in understanding the truck's operations better. @Piros1 showed interest in owning the vehicle if it remained within budget while also questioning the legroom and driving comfort.
Negative: Despite the overall excitement, there are concerns regarding comfort and usability. @Piros1 expressed worry about whether the vehicle would fit his budget, and @niko12 echoed that while the bucket seats are comfortable, they do not enhance legroom, as Power Wagons traditionally have limited space. Moreover, he highlighted the driving experience, cautioning that, due to its age, it lacks power steering and features a heavy suspension, which may affect ease of handling.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's condition and its features, particularly highlighting the 45k miles on the 2002 Mercedes SL500 Silver Arrow as a positive aspect. The Seller provided ample visual documentation, including pictures and videos, which several commenters appreciated, indicating transparency and thoroughness in showcasing the car. The Seller's offer to arrange shipping for potential buyers also added convenience, further enhancing the positive remarks about the auction.
Neutral: There were requests for additional details concerning the vehicle's undercarriage, indicating that some potential buyers might require further information before making a bid. @Mido specifically asked for pictures and videos of the car on a lift to inspect the undercarriage. Additionally, @reddib raised a question concerning the car's history, mentioning specific mechanical aspects such as airbag deployment, ball joints, and leaks, which shows a neutral stance focusing on factual inquiries rather than opinions about the vehicle's quality.
Negative: Some concerns were voiced regarding the vehicle's past issues, with @reddib questioning whether previous problems such as ball joint failures and oil leaks had been addressed. Doubts arose about the accuracy of certain features, including the status of the rear light assemblies as highlighted by @Mido, indicating a potential lack of confidence in the seller's claims. Such negative comments reflect a cautious approach from some commenters, showing that while the car may seem appealing, there are lingering doubts about certain aspects that could impact buyer decisions.
|
 |
Positive: Commentators noted the vehicle's paint and mechanical condition as being solid and without significant issues. @LangMotor (The Seller) highlighted that the car has been driven regularly, which is beneficial in preserving its components. Additionally, @MTH mentioned that concerns about IMS bearings or bore scoring are typically unfounded for models like this, suggesting reliability. A few commenters relayed positive experiences, discussing affordable solutions to common issues, thus indicating that the car has manageable maintenance requirements.
Neutral: There were inquiries regarding the vehicle's original features and maintenance history. @rwallace3243 and @dvcar1 posed questions about the engine swap and other service records, reflecting a desire for transparency regarding the car's past. @LangMotor (The Seller) provided clarification on the engine's originality and expressed intentions to verify service documentation, revealing a sense of cooperation with potential buyers. Other requests included videos showing the vehicle's convertible top operation and more details about the paint protection film, demonstrating a mixed interest in thorough inspection before purchase.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's cosmetic condition, particularly regarding the seating and the top operation fitment. @Upstate101 pointed out noticeable wear, including deep craters in the seat and a worn shifter leather, which seemed inconsistent with the reported mileage. Additionally, @dvcar1 expressed skepticism about the top fitting correctly, pointing out that it may require repair, which could incur additional costs. The visibility of protective film damage and the condition of the radio were also highlighted by commenters, casting doubt on the thoroughness of the car's maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the vehicle as a "gorgeous" Goshen Bel Air and praised the beautiful build. @ButWhatDoIKnow commented on how the car checks all the boxes, calling it a gem for whoever ends up with it. @Highlander63 specifically noted the beauty of the 55, reminiscing about a similar model owned by his father, and expressed optimism about the vehicle doing well in the market.
Neutral: @Bradhooley (The Seller) engaged with the audience, introducing himself and inviting potential buyers to ask questions. He mentioned that the car is available for in-person inspections by appointment and shared reassurance about additional photos and FaceTime videos being available upon request. @Bradhooley also highlighted the photos of important car details, including the untampered VIN and trim tag, along with a close-up of the motor block stamp number.
Negative: @JimDod reflected on his past experiences, reminiscing about having a 1955 convertible in high school in 1966, implying a sense of nostalgia rather than providing direct criticism of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @WylieDude expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, highlighting its beauty, while @JBS27 appreciated the specifications and recalled a positive past experience with a similar car. @JoeFrom603 also commented on the beautiful color combination, affirming the car's appealing appearance. Additionally, @LaViva showed interest in acquiring a similar vehicle and communicated with the seller regarding service records, indicating their potential purchase intentions.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) provided detailed information about the auction, showcasing their commitment to transparency and customer satisfaction with an impressive rating of 4.9/5.0. They also highlighted that the vehicle had been inspected and offered to provide a walkthrough for potential buyers. @LaViva further inquired about the oil change service interval, seeking more details to ensure the vehicle's maintenance history meets their expectations, and @MNberg inquired further about the desirability and reliability of the F-Type, indicating a broader interest in the model.
Negative: @Tigers196884 criticized a previous comment about the car's specifications, questioning its relevance to the listing. @bikerdoc expressed concern about the original tires' condition, suggesting they might not be safe given their age. Furthermore, @xkesteve noted the potential risks associated with older tires on such a powerful vehicle, showing apprehension about safety and performance aspects.
|
 |
Positive: @SeanFlynn29 shared a touching personal story about their '31 Model S, expressing love for the car and nostalgia for his childhood. @TimKnight (The Seller) also contributed to the sentiment, recalling how his kids enjoyed rides in the rumble seat, emphasizing the joy of owning such a classic vehicle. @mr_smee called it a 'sporty looking machine' and @BikerWilly praised the car's quality and appearance, highlighting that it is a gorgeous automobile and noting its impressive build during a time when manufacturers prioritized craftsmanship.
Neutral: @Mainwire inquired about the car's mechanical condition, particularly its road registration status and operational capability. @BikerWilly asked for clarification regarding the distributor issues, and @TimKnight (The Seller) responded with details about the car needing a 6V battery and some gas replacement while assuring that it runs fine. @TimKnight (The Seller) explained the issue with the electrical system when the fuse box was replaced and mentioned the vintage insurance and registration specifics for driving in British Columbia, which generated further interest among potential buyers.
Negative: @Mainwire raised concerns about whether there might be rust issues or past repairs to the car, which @TimKnight (The Seller) assured had no evidence of rust but mentioned the need for chrome work. @BikerWilly mentioned the difficulty of finding parts for older cars and questioned the reliability of operating such antique vehicles. @studejack suggested that the idea of street rodding due to parts availability is exaggerated, hinting at a sentiment that challenges in restoration are often overstated, implying that support for these vehicles exists through clubs and networks.
|
 |
Positive: @StuM describes the vehicle as a "B-U-T-FUL build," expressing admiration for its aesthetics. @boaboyoz also praises the truck, calling it a "fierce feisty Florida Ford F-100, rockin in red" and noting its cool factor. @Moparmadness views the Ford as a work of art that should be displayed but ultimately enjoyed, wishing luck for the auction. @SmokeFan14 echoes this sentiment, calling the truck beautiful and expressing hope that they can emulate its quality if they ever own one. @DJW48 marvels at the truck's beauty while noting it as an amazing creation.
Neutral: @Vridesgarage, the seller, expresses excitement about sharing their vehicles on BAT with fellow car enthusiasts, acknowledging that their website is currently down but promising to share more pictures and videos. They also mention that the truck was featured in a magazine and offer to send scans to interested parties. @J353 shows interest in the truck for their collection, specifically mentioning an inclination towards a 56' model but still appreciating this one. @TLAV and @jmagoto request videos and the opportunity for inspection before placing bids, indicating a desire for verification before committing to a purchase.
Negative: Several comments question the accuracy of details related to the truck. @DJW48 finds the side-view mirrors oddly placed, prompting clarification from @Vridesgarage regarding their function. Additionally, both @SebringBill and @jmagoto express confusion over the discrepancy between the LS3 motor mentioned in a magazine article and the LS2 engine listed in the auction, leading @Vridesgarage to clarify the truck indeed has an LS1. The need for a video and inspector by potential bidders indicates some skepticism about the vehicle's authenticity.
|
 |
Positive: Comments praising the vehicle highlight the Gen 4 Viper as an incredible machine that delivers an engaging driving experience, combining raw power with race car handling. @Motordad8 described it enthusiastically, noting its appealing aesthetics even among modern sports cars. Enthusiasts like @OldVett expressed love for the particular color combination of the ACR, emphasizing its rarity and beauty, and shared their positive ownership experiences over the years with no issues. Additionally, @Big_greasy_taco remarked on the car's impressive attributes, suggesting it will perform well on the market and pointing out the rarity of this model.
Neutral: Some comments provided factual information or corrections without strong opinions about the car itself. For instance, @OldVett made an important clarification regarding the production numbers of the color combination, suggesting that there were 51 ACRs produced in the graphite and black color scheme rather than the previously mentioned 10. @DailyJeep pointed out a typographical error concerning the signature of a well-known personality, reflecting a casual tone among enthusiasts. Overall, these comments illuminated some aspects of the vehicle's background without heavy emotional attachment.
Negative: A couple of comments introduced concerns about the vehicle's condition and brand perception. @stevenanastos asked directly about any scratches or mechanical issues, signaling a degree of caution from potential buyers. The inquiry points to common worries about used vehicles that may affect buyer confidence. While no serious issues were reported, mentions of small paint chips and a dent by the seller, @mikesclassiccars, could give a less favorable impression, albeit noted as minor. Overall, the comments revealed a mix of enthusiasm for the vehicle paired with some prudent scrutiny.
|
Ex–Sultan of Brunei 1995 Ferrari 456 GT Pininfarina Speciale
ZFFSP44A4S0103246
Lot 200732
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commentors such as @HKMotorcars expressed their enthusiasm by exclaiming 'Wow!' while @AHG09 shared their admiration for the vehicle's beauty, highlighting the allure of anything designed by Pininfarina. Many praised the car's unique features, like its special leather and bespoke modifications, with @pgilpat noting the stunning configuration and additional finish details. @boaboyoz emphasized the car's elegance, stating it combines quality craftsmanship with an intriguing backstory, which he deemed special. Furthermore, @Targa_Todd commended @enthusiastspec for bringing such an interesting car to auction, indicating a broader appreciation for the vehicle's distinct market presence.
Neutral: The information provided by @enthusiastspec included the car's historical significance and its modifications for the Sultan of Brunei. Various commentors discussed the car's provenance, with @Acos suggesting the Sultan's ownership might not enhance the vehicle's value as much now due to its multiple owners since. Questions about the vehicle's condition and service history were raised, with @The_Underhill_Account providing a checklist of details that potential buyers might want to know, such as window fit and age of tires. @RepairGuy was interested in the mechanical specs of the vehicle, indicating that more detailed documentation could help clarify the car's enhancements and whether they genuinely contribute to its value.
Negative: While some comments expressed admiration, not all perspectives were positive. @RepairGuy voiced skepticism about the value added by the Sultan's ownership, questioning the significance of the unique modifications which they deemed minimal. @Scott_S highlighted a negative view of the Sultan's collection, recalling a belief that his cars were often neglected or mismanaged. Additionally, @Acos pointed out that the Sultan's name alone might not justify the car commanding a high price. There was a hint of sarcasm in comments like that from @TorqueChap, who wondered about the Sultan's presence in the U.S. car market, hinting at drama surrounding the Sultan's reputed ownership of extravagant vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the 2008 Lotus Elise SC, highlighting its low mileage and unique color combination. @DrPots noted a sense of sadness for the car's underuse, suggesting that it's meant to be driven, while @6TVRs called it a rare find that should command high value. @Eludnu and @MechanicalMaven praised the car's stunning appearance and expected performance, with the latter remarking on its head-turning looks. @umanthp5 and @Holy_BRG echoed similar sentiments, complimenting the beautiful interior and especially the embroidered, carbon fiber leather seats. Overall, the vehicle is seen as a beautiful example of a well-crafted sports car.
Neutral: The seller, @Elanone, provided detailed information about the vehicle's history and original dealership, indicating it was once owned by a local client and had undergone repairs such as replacement of the instrument cluster and headlights due to defects. Remarkably, this particular Elise is one of only five made in the eye-catching Racing Green/Saffron Yellow stripes for the U.S. market. Comments also contained inquiries regarding the condition of the vehicle, including questions about the tires and aftermarket modifications. @gvblaw sought details about the carbon fiber door sills and paint modifications, which @Elanone clarified were indeed aftermarket, while confirming that the original paint work remained intact.
Negative: However, there were concerns raised by some users. @Roadrunner_CT questioned why certain components like the instrument cluster and headlights had been replaced, expressing curiosity over the repairs. @Bluesky asked about the tire age, implying that the condition of the tires could be a concern, to which @Elanone acknowledged that they should be replaced as they had been in place since 2012. Meanwhile, @BrianBIN cautioned bidders to be aware of potential issues, sharing a PSA about the seller's long history in the car business and noting that prospective buyers should feel confident in their purchase from a reputable dealer.
|
 |
Positive: @motorcarstudio highlights the charitable aspect of the sale, stating that all proceeds will support Operation Patriots FOB. The vehicle is described as potentially a daily driver with some minor sorting or as a solid platform for overland builds. It features a straight frame and no existing accident damage despite having a Salvage-Rebuilt title, which reassures potential buyers about its current condition. The seller also notes that the floors and door sills are in good shape, suggesting less rust than typically seen in other models from the same era.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @phil_c, emphasize the transparency of the sale process, stating that both he and @motorcarstudio are open to answering questions regarding the G-Wagen. There are ongoing discussions about specific features, such as the bullbar and seats, with @njarrett inquiring about the bullbar's brand and @Lkstk noting the seats appear to be from a different model. @M guztank comments on the necessary attention to details like interior and wiring that need to be addressed, showing that while the vehicle has potential, it may require additional care.
Negative: There are concerns about the vehicle's maintenance, particularly with the engine and the AC system. @Nukken1 raises questions about the originality of the engine and whether there are emission-related import issues. @JDP37Kerrville reflects on past experiences with these models and express skepticism over the AC functionality, suggesting there may be a freon leak or compressor issues. Additionally, @motorcarstudio admits that starting the vehicle can be problematic, stating it is difficult to start without starter fluid, which signals a concern about the engine's reliability that may deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @easterly4 expressed a strong sense of satisfaction with the vehicle, highlighting the lifetime warranty on the muffler as a significant asset. @bhoffma1 described the car as incredibly clean, reminiscing about their friend's similar car from high school and emphasizing how this particular unit is a pristine example. @bugnbox shared their nostalgia about owning the car in the past, reflecting on its fun performance and well-maintained condition, and concluded with a sense of confidence for potential buyers.
Neutral: @FDF1 (The Seller) provided a lot of detailed information about the car, mentioning it's an original first year US spec CRX with documented maintenance. They addressed questions about shipping options, service history, and the car's emissions qualifications, providing further insights into its background. Some commenters, like @Qhua and @Marks86, raised inquiries about potential misalignments and previous repairs, while @David_P noted the impressive fuel consumption of the car compared to modern vehicles.
Negative: Conversely, there were some concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @RyanJr pointed out visible misalignments in the hood and the front headlight, interpreting this as potential signs of previous damage. Similarly, @Athomas002 questioned the possibility of frame damage linked to the misalignment, a concern echoed by @jerhofer, who shared experiences with similar vehicles. @Mercgal expressed uncertainty about the availability of driving or starting videos to assess the car further, highlighting a lack of visual proof that might ease apprehensions.
|
 |
Positive: @TheObsidianCollection (The Seller) presents this BMW R100 Cafe Racer as a beautiful bike that is incredibly fun to ride and boasts a stunning custom paint job. The seller highlights that the auction is at no reserve, encouraging potential buyers to engage without hesitation. @Wheelz supports the seller's perspective, emphasizing that it is a running motorcycle, and suggests that those who can build a better bike should do so, while buyers should consider paying for a custom job.
Neutral: @Twosaun and @Apathyfern both provide constructive feedback, suggesting that a cold start and riding video would enhance interest and that the bike falls within a budget-friendly range. Apathyfern mentions specific upgrades like adding mufflers or changing the seat color to improve aesthetics, pointing out the potential for personalization.
Negative: Comments from @Enfield750 and @manicmechanic1 critique the bike's build quality and originality. @manicmechanic1 notes that many boxer conversions appear the same, implying a lack of creativity in this build. Additionally, @Baycity points out the use of cheap, no-name components and suggests that the bike has been assembled on a low budget. @Apathyfern also speculates that the bike may be noisy due to the lack of mufflers, which could be a drawback for longer rides.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle's appearance, with @JLsKA510 calling it stunning and @mick59 noting that the fender flares dramatically enhance its appeal. The aggressive look provided by the GT body kit was also highlighted, with @Mike_Breinin appreciating how it transforms the car's attitude. Overall, many found the design and color of the vehicle attractive, indicating its potential as a solid project for modification.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed curiosity and asked specific questions regarding the vehicle’s specifications. @truthseeker and @BurningDinos sought clarification about the fender materials, questioning whether they are steel or fiberglass. @AAkron87's request for the motor's VIN and comments from @SJBOTT regarding the vehicle's original VIN and badge origin reflect a need for more detailed information to understand the car's modifications and history better.
Negative: A number of comments raised concerns about the vehicle's condition and the seller's transparency. @ppm2u speculated that the car might have undergone engine changes and questioned the condition of the paint, while @Glecko suggested that the car may not hold up to close inspection. Additionally, @truthseeker criticized the seller for being unable to answer simple questions effectively, indicating potential buyer frustration. The uncertainty surrounding the designated VIN and its implications for value was discussed, with comments reflecting skepticism about the vehicle's modifications and authenticity.
|
 |
Positive: @chinanelson (The Seller) mentioned that the vehicle is registered and driving great now, highlighting that it would be enjoyable to drive around St. George and up to Zion, as suggested by @Blizzard340. The seller has also assured potential buyers about the quality of the brakes, stating they work great with no known issues after an overhaul, which included bleeding the system and replacing fluids. Additionally, @chinanelson provided the VIN for prospective buyers to look up, enhancing trust and transparency in the vehicle's documentation.
Neutral: There were inquiries about the original features of the vehicle, such as the hard top and bulkhead, with @ERitt questioning the components based on the VIN. @chinanelson clarified that the original hard top was not available when the vehicle was purchased, but offered an extra hard top from a 1976 model for a fee. Questions about the seating included the confirmation that the original seats were replaced with new ones from Tom's Offroad, providing clarity to potential buyers on the vehicle's condition and parts.
Negative: Some comments implied concerns about the vehicle's authenticity and completion, as @ptwerp asked for more details about the overhauled brakes and expressed a desire for clarity on the vehicle's status. @Magoo2025 pointed out difficulties in viewing the VIN, which indicates potential communication or visibility issues in the listing. Furthermore, while the seller indicated that the stock suspension is fine, they noted that the shocks probably need replacement, suggesting some underlying maintenance requirements.
|
 |
Positive: @Dino886 described the vehicle as a "Power cruiser" and noted how impressive the V-Boost activation can be, which surprised his brother during a high RPM run. @bah10000 expressed love for the fact that the Vmax retains its original exhaust and center stand, highlighting the vehicle's maintenance of classic features. @31Classics (The Seller) shared that the bike runs great and is very fast, showcasing their positive experiences in video uploads of a walk-around and driving clips.
Neutral: @31Classics (The Seller) answered queries from @Ash_Whole about the age of the tires and battery, indicating that the tires were replaced in 2016 with under 500 miles and shared that one tire is from 2013 while the other is from 2023. They also noted the battery is about 4-5 years old but has been functional despite being left without a charger for over three months. @GrandpaScott assisted by explaining how to access the battery, providing a helpful tip for interested buyers.
Negative: @Ash_Whole raised concerns about the age of the tires and battery along with the vehicle's overall running condition. @2searay inquired if the pipes were original, indicating potential skepticism towards modifications or replacements. The overall tone suggests a mixture of curiosity and caution regarding the vehicle's maintenance and parts, which some buyers may find troubling.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters are impressed with the vehicle's build quality and features. @rglassman expressed admiration, stating, "now that is a rig 😮💨," while @Tigers196884 noted they never knew they wanted a Sequoia and complimented @Eight02's work. @CoopCity mentioned the vehicle is a clean build in a great color, predicting that the next owner will quickly add 100k miles to it, showcasing the vehicle's durability and appeal.
Neutral: Several questions and comments were exchanged about specific features and conditions of the vehicle. @d wilson4 highlighted a minor crack in the driver's seat plastic, wondering if it would still be under warranty. @merk11 inquired about gas mileage and recalls on the vehicle, to which @Eight02 provided detailed responses. @Slingboy88 asked about the inclusion of third-row seats, and @Buffalomtn clarified where to mount the rear license plate, indicating practical concerns that potential buyers might have.
Negative: Some negative comments were raised regarding gas mileage discrepancies. @AtlanticObserver pointed out that the reported 12 mpg is significantly lower than Toyota's claimed 20 mpg combined, raising concerns about accuracy. Additionally, while @Eight02 explained that the mileage figures stem from mountain driving and modifications, it may leave some buyers wary about the vehicle's performance relative to expectations.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm and favorable opinions about the vehicle. @draw123z4 highlighted interest in the car's details, such as the door cards and paint protection film. @Mrsoupc (The Seller) reassured potential buyers about the condition of the door panels, stating they are tight with no chips or dings, which is positive for prospective buyers. @TheJayJayGuy shared a personal experience of successfully repairing a similar model's door panel, emphasizing the affordability of repair options for Boxster owners like this one.
Neutral: Several inquiries were raised regarding the vehicle's lien payoff process, service records, and condition of specific parts. @jkclassics asked about the amount of the lien, while @Oninac and @AbsoluteGarage sought clarification on the lien payoff process and service documentation respectively. @Phil9474 requested videos, including one of the convertible top operation, indicating a need for more visual information about the vehicle before making a decision.
Negative: Concerns regarding the potential condition of the vehicle were raised, particularly related to the door panels. @Spokayman noted a possible separation of the door panel on the driver's side, urging for clearer photos of the area. @Ewu57 echoed this concern and requested further details about maintenance records. The worry about door panel deterioration was compounded by @TheJayJayGuy's previous negative experience with his own vehicle, suggesting that potential buyers should be cautious.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments regarding its unique build, including @gkbdvm, who described it as a "Super cool build" due to its mixed parts from various Jeep models, creating a one-of-a-kind Jeep. @Lunentucker shared appreciation for the innovative ideas and execution present in the vehicle, even noting its coolness despite slight concerns. The seller, @Bill1309, enthusiastically provided details about the vehicle, highlighting its history as the May 2014 calendar model for the Jeepster Commando Club. The seller also assures potential buyers of the vehicle’s quality, mentioning it starts well and can handle being driven at highway speeds, with smooth operation of the 4WD.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed interest in obtaining more information about the vehicle. @zinzou requested video evidence to illustrate the vehicle's cold start and performance while driving, indicating a desire for reassurance about its functionality. Additionally, @zinzou inquired about the condition of the windshield, prompting other comments regarding the design specifics of the Jeepster Commando. @Lunentucker suggested that while the Jeep has great potential, additional videos and documentation could help maximize its sale price, hinting that more transparency could benefit both the seller and potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the presentation and perceived quality of the vehicle's finish, as noted by @Lunentucker, who detected recent overspray on the chassis, which raised doubts about the prep work and possible hidden rust issues. @surfdog also mentioned the unusual placement of the battery as a point of interest. While the seller, @Bill1309, responded to these comments, stating there are no body or frame rust issues, skepticism may remain regarding the recent touch-ups and the overall aesthetic that could deter potential buyers. The mixed reception suggests that improvements in presentation and video evidence could address these concerns.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg appreciates the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle, noting that the Atlantic Blue over Cream Beige color combination looks impressive in the 645Ci model. Additionally, @georgepehanick describes the convertible as cool, indicating overall positive feelings about its design and features.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics provides insights into the vehicle's listing, emphasizing the dealership's reputation, commitment to transparency, and customer satisfaction, as evidenced by their high Google Reviews score. They also encourage potential buyers to inspect the car, offering various services like shipping and inspections, which reflects a straightforward approach to sales.
Negative: @GLWTA raises a concern regarding a minor damage noted on the car fax, seeking clarification on its specifics. Furthermore, @georgepehanick critiques the vehicle's engine, labeling it as one of the worst engines produced by BMW, which introduces a significant negative aspect to the vehicle's overall evaluation.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed a profound admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and impressive features. @shaddai described it simply as 'Beautiful!', while @JetPauls510 characterized it as 'Absolutely GORGEOUS!!!' and mentioned he had thoroughly detailed and painted his own similar model. Many found the car visually striking, with @JLsKA510 describing it as making one 'drool' and even acknowledging its slight rake as appealing. Enthusiasts like @RussMcD3 praised its handling and ability to make drivers feel like champions, while @Drdjet labeled it the 'PERFECT race car' for amateur events with its safe and great handling characteristics. Overall, there was a strong consensus on the vehicle's aesthetic and performance allure, making it a sought-after classic.
Neutral: Several comments were centered around technical inquiries and discussions, indicating a blend of enthusiasm and curiosity without strong emotional bias. For instance, @craZee anticipated comments about street legality, while @LoudNotFast humorously noted that anything could be street legal if one avoided being caught. @gteneyck provided insight into the car's history and its modifications, detailing how the blue interior came to be and mentioning his experiences with the vehicle's previous builds. Discussions on its race history and updates on racing compliance were shared, with @911r (The Seller) addressing questions about its current condition and history in races.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns regarding the vehicle's race-readiness and seller reputation. @Glowdog mentioned an interest in better-quality pictures and questioned the seller's reputation on BaT, suggesting it might appear too pristine to race. Similarly, @soquelz supported @Glowdog's remarks about the seller, reflecting skepticism about the overall credibility and condition of such a well-presented car. @Watry pointed out inconsistencies regarding race classifications, inquiring why the car was categorized as F Production rather than B Sedan, highlighting a potential confusion about its racing eligibility. The discussions hinted at apprehensions about the car's modifications in relation to racing regulations, suggesting a need for clarity before potential buyers commit.
|
 |
Positive: @Easttnbuyer expresses excitement about the vehicle, calling it a "great rig" and shares that they have a similar model, indicating a strong community interest in the vehicle's potential sale. @Mongoose55 praises @genevamotorcars for their impressive listings, including this vehicle, noting them as one of the top sellers, which highlights the vehicle's appeal among serious car enthusiasts. @genevamotorcars confirms the wheels were refinished, addressing additional questions from potential buyers and enhancing confidence in the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: @Jagbuxx questions the vehicle's year based on its VIN, which shows that buyers are attentive to details and trying to gather accurate information about the car. @BallCoach asks about any potential odors inside the vehicle, showing a careful consideration of the vehicle's condition beyond just its exterior. @Olivario inquires about prior usage, asking about beach driving and the number of keys, indicating a thoughtful assessment of the vehicle's past and usability.
Negative: @Beam57 observes inconsistencies in the wheel condition, pointing out noticeable curb rash in some pictures and suggesting a lack of thoroughness in the photo presentation. Additionally, @Olivario's concern about potential corrosion from beach driving reflects apprehension regarding the vehicle's underlying condition, potentially indicating deeper maintenance issues. Overall, some comments hint at a need for clearer communication about the vehicle's history and specifics.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered positive feedback for its overall appeal and functionality. @kalpaper (The Seller) emphasizes that it fits in a standard garage and highlights its smooth operation in different driving modes, noting that the transfer case works seamlessly in two-wheel and four-wheel drive. Additionally, the truck requires no significant repairs, with @kalpaper (The Seller) confirming no leaks and a well-maintained undercarriage. Commenters like @Crowmagnum express appreciation for the truck's solid nature and reliability, suggesting a high level of confidence in its performance.
Neutral: Some questions were raised regarding specific features and conditions related to the vehicle, demonstrating a mix of curiosity and due diligence. @Crowmagnum inquires about the truck's oil pressure, noting a low reading during a video observation but later clarifies that what was initially perceived as a concern was simply an aftermarket gauge. @someZguy asks about the condition of the tires, fuel tank, and rubber fuel lines due to the vehicle's age, while @navind discusses the curb weight of the vehicle, seeking practical information for potential transport.
Negative: Concerns were voiced regarding a few aspects of the vehicle. @Crowmagnum initially noted what appeared to be low oil pressure, which raised alarms about the truck's health, although @kalpaper (The Seller) addressed these concerns by demonstrating the correct functioning of gauges and providing additional explanations. There were also remarks about a cut in the upholstery on the driver's seat, indicating it isn't in perfect condition, but the seller reassured that overall, the upholstery is in very good shape. Commenters reflected a cautious optimism while maintaining awareness of the vehicle's imperfections.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's impressive modifications and performance capabilities. @shanejanssen highlights that the car has been modified to compete with GT cars, emphasizing the 523 wheel horsepower achieved on the dyno. @changedriven calls it a beast, and @jonathanls250 describes it as the most well put together 991.2 they've seen, underlining the quality of components. @tigers196884 notes that the substantial investment of $56K in upgrades reflects the value of the car, indicating a strong market interest in modified Porsches.
Neutral: Several comments address specific features and performance attributes without strong bias. @lottacars inquires about the potential for overrev situations in manual mode on the PDK transmission, while @SmokeyBoys asks about the suspension compared to stock. @doyouwantfries brings up previous bidding history for the car, contributing to the discussion about its market value. @reformedwallstreeter seeks clarity about the car's setup for street driving and the adjustability of the coilovers, indicating a thoughtful consideration from potential buyers.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns or pose critical questions regarding the vehicle. @doyouwantfries points out what appears to be a staining issue on the dash, seeking confirmation from the seller. @DanAMG expresses a desire for hard data, such as lap times or performance metrics, rather than anecdotal evidence of the car's capabilities. @zapp raises a question about whether the vehicle would pass California's SMOG check, highlighting a potential regulatory concern. Additionally, @catharpin critiques the choice of exhaust control, suggesting that a more integrated solution would have been preferable.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's aesthetics and overall condition. @shiloh808 expresses excitement, calling the truck 'perfect', while @elalonde describes it as 'gorgeous'. @Rushzero1 adds that it is a 'beautiful truck', particularly noting the appealing red interior. @hootiejanks appreciates the red color combination, stating it is a 'very clean rig' that should bring joy to its new owner. Several others, including @JeffHarvBrady and @Bmarcum, commend the owner's tasteful modifications and the nostalgic value of the truck, reinforcing its desirability in the classic market.
Neutral: @Underdog_haulston (The Seller) provides detailed information about the truck's specifications and modifications, including the original non-turbo engine and the aftermarket Banks Sidewinder turbo. The seller also clarifies the origin of the truck, confirming it's not linked to a particular previous owner mentioned by @N8J. Additionally, the seller discusses the clutch situation, noting that the switch to a single mass flywheel resolved an issue without necessitating replacement due to wear. @steve575 inquired about the performance comparison of the aftermarket turbo to newer Powerstroke motors, and the seller assures that it runs impressively well, even if not matching today’s diesel truck power.
Negative: There are some critiques regarding the truck's modifications, particularly by @Kettlecorn who wishes the truck had a specific color scheme and questions whether it has been repainted. While these comments are relatively mild, they reflect some potential reservations among prospective buyers about the truck's originality and modification history. Overall, there are no harsh criticisms from users, but the desire for authenticity does come through in a few comments.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle's exceptional build quality and aesthetic appeal. @Dollycat3 declared it a "very exemplary and stunning build," while @ck1951 noted that it was a "Stunning 58 not a nickel spared." @LumberjackGlenn called the opening picture "Killer," highlighting the blend of originality and custom elements. Many commenters like @Gettin_old mentioned the car's elegance and mean looks, with @boaboyoz labeling the build as "impeccable and incredible." Moreover, @tlcamg appreciated the car's color and stance, calling it a wonderful job. Overall, the consensus is that this vehicle is a striking and impressive example of automotive craftsmanship.
Neutral: Several comments indicated curiosity about the vehicle's modifications and specifications. @harley-jm raised questions about the dyno sheets, engine specs, and the overall functionality of the car's features such as brakes and air conditioning. The seller, @calclassic, responded openly about the car's history and modifications, saying it has been well-maintained and addressing the inquiries about past performance and build quality. Additionally, @Ghosty asked for clarification about the components of the cooling system. These questions seem to reflect a strong interest in the vehicle's performance aspects and its upgrades, as potential buyers want to understand all facets of this custom build.
Negative: While overall sentiments were positive, some criticisms were noted, primarily concerning the vehicle's traction capabilities. @Mike_Breinin pointed out a "glaring issue" with a lack of traction due to the chosen wheels, suggesting a switch to steel wheels for better performance. @harley-jm echoed similar concerns about control, questioning whether traction control was functional given the car's reported behavior. There was also dialogue about the vehicle not being suited for purists, suggesting it’s a departure from traditional builds. The seller acknowledged some previous issues during the vehicle's modifications but maintained that overall, the car is a solid build despite some areas needing improvements for enhanced performance.
|
 |
Positive: @gwhitaker49 (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, introducing himself as a long-time Porsche enthusiast with three vehicles and years of experience. Commenters like @ePoch01776MB praise the car's "simple beauty" and its well-preserved state, highlighting the superb condition of the vehicle. @Segura911 appreciates the car and compliments the driving video, indicating interest and excitement about the auction while also thanking the seller for his transparency.
Neutral: @gwhitaker49 (The Seller) discusses the car's history and service, acknowledging the lack of complete maintenance records prior to his ownership but suggests that the provided Carfax and other documents offer a compelling picture of the vehicle's service. He mentions the substantial cost of the recent transmission rebuild and the addition of new synchros, pointing out that while it improved shifting, the intermittent issue with second gear remains unresolved. The seller plans to provide additional content, including videos, to give potential buyers more insight.
Negative: Comments from @besi and @gwhitaker49 (The Seller) highlight the mechanical concerns, specifically regarding the second-gear shifting problem that persists even after a costly transmission rebuild. Despite the improvements reported by the seller, the ongoing issue seems to dampen some enthusiasm. The seller conveys a sense of transparency about the car's challenges, but the mention of potential problems may discourage some prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is a 2016 Mercedes Benz C253 GLC300 4Matic, presented in a stunning Polar White exterior with an Almond Beige and Black interior, enhanced by Linden Wood Trim. It boasts numerous high-end features such as a panoramic sunroof, heated steering wheel, full-LED headlamps, and a premium multimedia package that includes an 8" high-resolution LCD screen with navigation capabilities. The seller, @aegmotorsports, provides extensive details about the vehicle's condition and equipment, including a complete build sheet and service history, ensuring potential buyers have all the necessary information.
Neutral: Comments included inquiries about specific vehicle features, such as a question from @capnbob959 regarding the presence of a spare tire. @aegmotorsports clarified that the vehicle is not equipped with a spare tire and originally came with run flat tires, which have been replaced with conventional tires for improved ride comfort. The seller advises carrying a can of fix-a-flat for emergencies, demonstrating a proactive approach to buyer concerns.
Negative: Some concerns arose regarding the absence of a spare tire, with @capnbob959 expressing that this should have been addressed for better preparedness. While @aegmotorsports provided explanations about the tire situation and the reasons for the switch to conventional tires, it indicates that potential buyers may feel uneasy about the impact of this change on vehicle performance and safety. Additionally, @aegmotorsports cautions that any flickering during video demonstrations is not indicative of real-life display issues, which could lead to further skepticism among viewers about the vehicle's electronic systems.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters are enthusiastic about the vehicle, noting its potential as a starting point for new drivers or even as a foundation for a Champ Car enduro racer. @rossvesq mentions their fond memories of driving a similar model and praises its characteristics, highlighting that it offers an opportunity to truly hone driving skills rather than relying solely on horsepower. @AndyF007 expresses that this vehicle is their favorite Porsche currently available, calling it absolutely perfect, while @hermanss (The Seller) appreciates the excitement and engagement from potential bidders, creating a warm atmosphere around the sale.
Neutral: @hermanss (The Seller) provides details about the vehicle's condition and history, responding to inquiries about its performance and last usage on the track. The seller clarifies that the last time it was on track was in 2020 and mentions that the brakes were recently flushed, ensuring the vehicle is in a ready state for potential competition. Additionally, @Jpena5754 expresses interest in visiting to check out the car, highlighting the ongoing communication between potential buyers and the seller.
Negative: Some comments hint at concerns about the car's current state. @trackguy raises a question about the vehicle's transmission, suggesting that if it falls short in 5th gear at high RPMs, it could indicate a problem. While @motoguzzi70 humorously notes the inclusion of touch-up paint, it seems to imply that the vehicle may need some cosmetic attention. This mention, coupled with @rossvesq's acknowledgment of its 'beaten up' nature, suggests it may not be in pristine condition, which could deter some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the car for its beautiful color and excellent condition. @emonomics called it a "nice specimen," while @702e30girl noted the upholstery and color combination as beautiful. Additionally, @Carguy0510 (The Seller) confirmed that the car's A/C system works very well and blows cold air, which was a concern for potential buyers. Commenters also appreciated the detailed photographs showing the car's unique color and well-maintained interior, with @bmwe30m3guy highlighting the rarity and depth of the Glacier Blue color. Overall, many found the vehicle to be a great representation of the E30.
Neutral: Some comments indicated a willingness to discuss the car's maintenance and originality. @Scotrell inquired about the timing belt service, to which @Carguy0510 (The Seller) responded that it was done in October 2019. Other buyers asked about the car's paint, with @Joed confirming that it is all original with no issues with the clear coat. Commenters also exchanged insights about automatic versus manual transmission preferences, suggesting that while automatics may prevent certain driving habits, a manual swap could enhance the driving experience. This discussion reflected varied perspectives on how the car could serve a driver's needs.
Negative: There were a few concerns raised among the comments regarding the reliability and manual transmission options. @Woody asked about the overall reliability of the BMW, although @Carguy0510 (The Seller) reassured that it is extremely reliable and could serve as a daily driver. Similarly, @OCEquestrian voiced skepticism about well-preserved E30s, implying that their condition may not be widespread. @cjklim even considered the car's maintenance intervals and how closely they should be followed. While these comments were not overly critical, they demonstrated an awareness of potential challenges that come with owning such a classic vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the scooter for its beauty and restoration quality. @Streeter expressed a desire to ride it at Sturgis, calling it a "beautiful restoration," while @MisterCombustion described it as one of Harley's most charming creations, highlighting its unique features like the CVT transmission and mid-century Americana styling. The restoration details were particularly noted, with @MisterCombustion complimenting the thoroughness of the work, including mentions of professional re-chroming and documented parts and labor costs, affirming the quality of the rebuild.
Neutral: Several comments provided factual insights or additional context regarding the scooter's specifications and history. @knucklehead_61 clarified that the Topper scooters were manufactured in Milwaukee, not Italy, and outlined the engine's specifications. @team14offroad asked about identifying numbers on their own Topper, showing interest in the model's history, while @Paul85 pointed out that there is typically a VIN decal on the control panel, which could enhance identification. @gmtspeed (The Seller) confirmed queries regarding the operational status of the choke and detailed the engine case markings important for identification.
Negative: A few comments pointed out shortcomings or express skepticism about the scooter's functionality. @pessia mentioned disappointment over the horn not being fixed post-refurbishment, hinting at quality control concerns. @Orangedot shared a personal experience, stating that although the scooter looked great, it was not very enjoyable to ride, attributing this to the primitive design of American hardware from the 1960s. Overall, while the restoration was celebrated, some users brought up limitations and challenges associated with the classic scooter.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle reflect a strong admiration from the community, with many users expressing excitement and nostalgia. @Kevinlarry1978 is looking forward to hearing the engine run, and @JamesClarke mentions that it makes his heart race. @PhilO describes the bike as beautiful, and @Evivant adds an enthusiastic emoji. Several commenters highlight the need for videos showcasing the bike in action, with @traveler_1701 specifically requesting start-up and riding videos. The rarity of the vehicle is emphasized, and @H2R shares insights praising it as the first turbocharged motorcycle, which adds to its allure.
Neutral: Many commenters have inquired about the bike's specifications and performance metrics. @CMG241 points out that the bike has approximately 130 horsepower and a quarter-mile time of around 10 seconds. @rlhug1954 reminisces about his past experience with the bike, noting its impressive speed and handling characteristics. Several users also reference the production numbers, discussing the rarity of the Z1-R-TC models, which are believed to be below 200 for certain colors. @redsunmoto mentions the issues with specific models, indicating they were not widely produced, which fuels further interest in this particular auction.
Negative: Conversely, there are some concerns raised regarding the bike's performance history. @Fleche_dOr critiques it as a "flawed bike that is super desirable," calling attention to its history of mechanical issues. @redsunmoto shares personal fears of potential engine failure with the blue model due to turbo problems. @Phillip_Shaffer mentions that the bike caused a significant accident in his past, resulting in a long hospital stay. This mixed feedback underscores some apprehension about the bike's reliability despite its desirability and vintage appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle, with @watergate528 noting its good color and @MikeR. describing the TRX as a great truck with an impressive interior and performance. @FBCB echoed this sentiment by sharing their positive experience owning a TRX, highlighting the enjoyable ride and minimal issues they've encountered, making it a vehicle they have no intention of selling. Overall, the TRX is viewed by some as a significant bargain given its low mileage and impressive features.
Neutral: Some participants in the discussion sought additional information and clarification about the vehicle. @Scott68GTO questioned the mileage of the truck, to which @Baronautogroup (The Seller) responded that it was part of a private collection maintained in excellent condition, emphasizing that it was never driven daily. Additionally, @autorama inquired about the presence of cooled or ventilated seats, showing interest in the vehicle's features, while @jaston pointed out that it seemed low optioned for a collector's item, suggesting some potential drawbacks in its configuration.
Negative: There were a few critical comments regarding the vehicle's value and options. @Vyper340 expressed concern that unless the vehicle has been kept in a collection, its value might already be at its peak and questioned its worth moving forward. Additionally, @Ameasohoany raised a significant point about aesthetic modifications by dealerships, calling it unacceptable, reflecting a sentiment that some people view dealership practices unfavorably.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the overall presentation and aesthetics of the XK120, with @PAEnglish11 calling it a "beautifully presented" vehicle. @galaxieman1 complimented the exceptional photography, stating it effectively showcases the car's details and restoration quality. @Jags_in_the_barn highlighted the impressive upgrades like the 5-speed transmission and twin exhaust, stating they enhance drivability and sound quality. @MNberg provided detailed feedback on how modifications can improve driving experience, reiterating the car's stunning qualities and encouraging potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters noted factual aspects of the vehicle, with @AbsoluteXKs inquiring about the restoration history and @2acrisp commenting on the non-SE model designation and its features. These observations indicate a blend of curiosity about the car's specifications and appreciation for the restoration process. @oldschoolclassics (The Seller) confirmed the restoration was performed meticulously for JCNA Concours competition, emphasizing the car's accolades and history, which includes winning multiple awards.
Negative: On the downside, a few concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's mechanical aspects. @MGB6 questioned the drive shaft's alignment from the transmission to the differential, while @Famcape58 requested specific images to assess the car's side view without the rear spats, indicating potential issues with aesthetics. Additionally, @Bill.H's perspective reflects a personal preference for vehicles not extensively modified or reconstructed, suggesting that some might prefer a less altered version of classic cars like the XK120.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the vehicle for its impressive condition and luxurious features. @Ezedozitt21 compliments it as a 'cream puff' and expresses excitement for the auction, while @Dollycat3 praises the low mileage and the sumptuous interior, noting the rare factory sunroof. @lincolnsandcaddies adds that it is a stunning vehicle, reflecting on the craftsmanship of earlier GM models. Other users, like @Craven and @Bowties_garage, highlight the well-preserved nature of the Electra, with @Craven noting the impressive underside and overall look, while @qualityride shares nostalgic memories of owning Buicks and wishes the best to the future owner.
Neutral: A number of comments discuss the history and features of the vehicle without strong positive or negative sentiment. For instance, @Jason and @ericdev provide insights into the factory options available for the moonroof and the car's features, indicating some debate over whether it was factory-installed or aftermarket. @CarFoolLane reflects on the end of large, body-on-frame cars, providing some context about the era in which the Electra was produced, while @sjy66 shares fond memories of driving a similar model with family, indicating a connection to the vehicle's legacy without expressing a desire to purchase it.
Negative: While many comments are overwhelmingly positive, there are a few critical observations. @kainzy mentions that while the car is beautiful, the velour seats can feel 'too soft' and uncomfortable during driving. @longmire45 notes the scarcity of such cars today, lamenting their disappearance from the highways, which implies a sense of loss regarding their once-prominent status. Although these comments highlight minor issues or feelings of nostalgia rather than outright negativity, they reflect a wistfulness for a bygone era of classic American automobiles.
|
 |
Positive: @Tudo describes the vehicle as a 'neat car', indicating a favorable impression of its design and appeal. @John_E_Drummond echoes this sentiment by expressing that, with a slight drop and some monoblocks, it could become a 'panty dropper'. The seller, @ceccmotoring, highlights the recent $4k service performed on the car, mentioning significant upgrades such as new tires and an AC compressor, which may enhance the car's performance and reliability. @ntrepid offers a supportive view on the automatic transmission, suggesting it is surprisingly responsive, thus endorsing a positive driving experience with the vehicle.
Neutral: @66modelo comments on the car's previous sale attempt, noting that it didn't sell at a reserve of $17,200 in January, which may indicate the complexities related to its valuation. This perspective underscores the competitive nature of online vehicle auctions. @2mAn expresses curiosity about the auction's outcome, sharing his intention to possibly list his own vehicle, which suggests an ongoing interest in similar cars without making a definitive judgment about this specific vehicle's value or quality.
Negative: @Long2757 raises concerns regarding the car's 2013 tires, stating a lack of trust in their reliability and suggesting the seller should have provided new tires before listing. @LandCruiserDan points out the absence of the Getrag dog-leg shifter, indicating a perceived deficiency in the car's specifications. Additionally, @66modelo expresses skepticism about the car's performance with its automatic transmission, highlighting concerns regarding its horsepower and weight, while implying that it might not compete favorably against other vehicles, like a Hyundai Veloster. @MM27 mentions the factory design's lack of cupholders, indicating a potential inconvenience for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a sense of excitement and admiration for the Sunbeam Venezia as a rare and unique vehicle. @ekmcmullen describes it as 'adorable but weird' while @df69021ta notes that its unusual design makes it appealing and worth restoring. @Jaars highlights the car's decent condition, mentioning that the paint is not all bad and the bottom is in better shape than expected. There is a general appreciation for the car's history and connection to Italian design and British engineering that many commentators find charming.
Neutral: Several comments also focus on specific details regarding the vehicle's condition and potential issues. @bratfink points out concerns about rot and chassis tags that require further explanation, while @vanagonjon humorously compares its appearance to a children's ride. @Jaars notes the presence of surface rust and mentions the need for some rubber trims to be replaced. These neutral observations indicate that while the car has its quirks, it still holds potential for restoration.
Negative: There are some critical concerns raised regarding the vehicle's condition. @bratfink emphasizes the serious rot near the rear shackle and the lack of information about the overdrive (OD) functionality, expressing skepticism about the car's reliability. @AlpineJay corroborates these worries by mentioning a need for clarification on the vehicle's transmission and OD. The comments suggest a divided opinion on the car’s restoration prospects, with some seeing its potential and others being wary of the needed repairs.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's condition and unique background, with praise directed towards the seller @Acerman for taking excellent care of the car, which has won multiple class awards at car shows. Commenters like @Crussell99 and @ImTonyDanza were impressed by its appearance and especially interested in the craftsmanship of the car cover, even though there was a general mix of opinions on its use. Additionally, @ftwayner appreciated the personal connection between the seller being a Product Development Engineer and the car itself, highlighting the special nature of the auction.
Neutral: The discussion about the car included some inquiries about its features, such as whether it was a WS6 model, which @Caffeinated25 clarified it wasn't due to factory build issues at the time of ordering. @GIJoe1983 asked about the original window sticker, and @Buster020065 requested documentation of maintenance history, pointing out that Carfax shows nothing. The seller acknowledged these concerns, explaining that he maintained the vehicle himself and provided the requested information.
Negative: There were also some critical comments, particularly regarding the use of the bra on the car, with users like @beach2771 and @BillyBaldone questioning its relevance and appropriateness for a vehicle in 2025. @Yourk9guy pointed out how some were overly suspicious about the cover, suggesting a conspiracy regarding hidden damage. Despite @Acerman's reassurances about the vehicle's condition, some skepticism lingered, particularly concerning the lack of formal maintenance documentation and clarity around the vehicle's history.
|
 |
Positive: @Auto_Esoterica praises the bike's performance, noting that the 110" engine offers substantial torque, particularly after modifications like a cam change and dyno tune. @PSpags shares a personal experience of owning the same model, highlighting its uniqueness and quality. They describe the bike's aesthetics in detail, particularly its striking paint job and special features, expressing excitement about its powerful engine and inviting potential buyers into the community of owners.
Neutral: @Shelbyisthe1 raises important practical questions related to the bike's condition, asking if the tires are original and inquiring about rust, storage, fluid leaks, and the state of the battery and brake fluid. @CoatesvilleGuy (The Seller) responds to these inquiries with thorough information, confirming that the bike has no rust, was garage-kept, had its battery replaced last year, and all fluids changed recently. The seller also mentions that the tires are original.
Negative: The lack of responsiveness to @Shelbyisthe1's concerns about the original tires might suggest potential wariness for buyers accustomed to different maintenance standards, although the seller provides reassurance about the bike's overall condition. However, the originality of the tires from 2009 could suggest they may need replacing soon, raising safety and performance concerns. Overall, while the vehicle has many strengths, these unresolved issues might give some buyers pause.
|
 |
Positive: @ElkManMi describes the vehicle as a beauty that many would love, while @GLWA,Capt._Doug admires the stunning color combination and notes the additional features like the manual transmission and hardtop that enhance the package. @GDogg finds the Series III Roadster incredible, praising its mesmerizing blue color. @NSY64 loves the car for being well-kept with tasteful modifications, stating it has been appropriately loved and deserves a quality bid. @DSFM2005 (The Seller) presents the car as a superbly prepared, turn-key example of a Series III E-Type Roadster, noting its rare qualities and extensive documentation.
Neutral: @CoastsideCat expresses anticipation for a more in-depth video focusing on the exhaust note, which has been updated since the last auction. @quickmx5 inquires about the material of the upholstery, while @highway129 questions the dealer's fee structure associated with the auction. @kevininHawaii mentions the inclusion of proper XWX tires as a positive aspect. @kinglaw reviews the car's original carpet color and acknowledges the impressive work done post-acquisition, while also highlighting the historical connection between the gray leather and blue finish.
Negative: @FlyPanther raises a concern about the stick shift appearing to pop out of gear during a driving video. @XK120SE91 suggests an easily fixable issue regarding the fan's position but implies that it might detract from the vehicle's overall presentation. @kinglaw also expresses frustration about the inability to edit simple errors in comments, indicating a potential issue with the platform's commenting system.
|
 |
Positive: @MrSto commented positively about the bike, calling it a nice bike and inquiring if the spare handlebar is original. @Randakk shared a similar enthusiasm, stating that he has owned an identical bike and found it great fun to ride, labeling it one of his favorite Hondas. @CRussell reminisced about having one in the same color as his first motorcycle, expressing that it was sublime back then and remains so now. @TGLewis described the machine as gorgeous, suggesting that the next owner should note the size of the rear tire, though acknowledging it looks cool.
Neutral: @tim54575, the seller, responded to inquiries regarding the handlebar, stating that it is the original one from when the bike was obtained by the current owner. He also noted that the tires are quite old, recommending replacements before returning to the road. The seller acknowledged additional comments from @DNL regarding requests for videos of the bike's cold start, engine idle, and functionality of lights, indicating he would work on these videos despite not living close to the bike. Several comments were made about the condition and functionality of the motorcycle, with suggestions for fixes from multiple users.
Negative: @CapitolaKnapp raised concerns about the exhaust sound, comparing it to someone shaking a can of marbles, which hinted at a possible issue. @GAMESNTHINGS speculated that the issue with the headlight could stem from the start switch, suggesting it may need maintenance due to age. @riddimrain commented on the noisy cam chain, recommending a tune-up and tightening to improve the sound of the engine, which should ideally run quietly. @tim54575 acknowledged the issues raised, thanking users for their feedback and guidance.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments reflect a strong admiration for the G wagen and its modifications. @anthonyjp mentioned that the vehicle looks great, noting its rugged appearance and usability as a 4x4 Squared. @superlazy appreciates the aesthetic of the spare tire carrier and the overall design of the vehicle, while @mfedorov highlights that the vehicle's portals might offer significant lift. The seller, @scharrer, expressed his personal connection to the G wagen, sharing the story of how he acquired it and detailing his love for this unique vehicle. He also commented on the impressive condition and meticulous modifications carried out by the previous owner, indicating a well-cared-for vehicle that is ideally suited for off-road adventures.
Neutral: There are various inquiries and observations from community members indicating curiosity about specific features and details of the vehicle. For example, @bradl038 asked about the cargo mat, while @mfedorov inquired about the height of the vehicle and its compatibility with standard garages. The seller, @scharrer, provided detailed responses, clarifying that the vehicle has no additional lift beyond the 5-inch gain from the portal axles and made further notes about the sound system and storage solutions, reflecting a collaborative and interactive discussion focused on practical aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: A few comments express skepticism regarding the auction process, particularly from @superlazy, who questions the validity of bids placed. @Refman raised concerns regarding potential imperfections in the windshield and tires, questioning the vehicle's overall condition. The seller, @scharrer, addressed these concerns, explaining that the windshield issue is a minor chip that has not affected his experience with the vehicle. However, there's an underlying concern about the potential costs involved in addressing these minor imperfections, which may deter some prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @jdf1271 expressed strong enthusiasm for the 718 Boxster S, stating it's the best car he's ever owned after nearly seven years of daily driving. He noted that it still feels as exhilarating to drive as it did on the first day, particularly praising the engine's performance. @CA90275 echoed this sentiment, describing the car as underrated and highlighting its lightweight design and impressive acceleration. He also appreciates the quick convertible top operation and the potential for performance upgrades.
Neutral: @Bumpo raised questions regarding the vehicle's emissions inspection exemption due to low mileage and later answered his own question. @718Austin78734 commented on the unique Rhodium Silver Metallic color of the vehicle, suggesting a preference for clear side markers over amber. @Gunny7330 inquired about the presence of two keys and whether there is a build list or window sticker available, while @Pcar17 asked if the vehicle is equipped with Apple CarPlay. The seller confirmed these inquiries with various pieces of information.
Negative: @PowHog brought up concerns regarding potential turbo problems in early models of the 718 Boxster S, which he suspected might need to be addressed. However, @gtrajt (The Seller) clarified that he was not aware of any such issues. @Gunny7330 also highlighted a lack of clarity in the information provided, specifically referencing service records and whether there had been any recent maintenance since a dealer visit in April 2022.
|
 |
Positive: The 2015 BMW F33 428i Convertible is described as a gorgeous vehicle featuring a stunning Melbourne Red Metallic exterior and a luxurious Venetian Beige Dakota interior with Burled Walnut wood trim. The seller, @aegmotorsports, emphasizes the vehicle's low mileage of 50k and its extensive range of premium features, including the Driver Assistance Package, Premium Package, and Technology Package. Additional highlights such as the retractable hardtop, heated seats, and navigation system contribute to the car's appeal, making it an inviting option for potential buyers.
Neutral: In response to inquiries, @aegmotorsports provides information about the vehicle's history, including that the engine coolant pump recall from 2024 has not yet been addressed and can be handled free of charge at a local BMW dealer. Tire dates indicate they were installed in July 2020, with their date codes showing they are from 2019. The seller also assures potential buyers that all vehicle screens work perfectly, clarifying any visual discrepancies observed in the videos due to camera frequency.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @MyFirstTime regarding the unresolved coolant pump recall and the aging tires. Many buyers may find the recall status concerning, as it requires the new owner to initiate the process at a dealership. The seller indicated the vehicle was serviced at the BMW dealer but mentioned that the recall may not have been completed due to parts availability issues, putting potential buyers in a position of needing to address the recall shortly after purchase.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's design and craftsmanship. @DaveD highlighted the elegant simplicity and beauty of the car, calling it 'absolutely sublime,' while @GeneG referred to it as a great-looking 'proper motor car.' Others, like @fepatton, described it as 'the most beautiful RR coupe' they've seen in a long time, and @mickeyamo praised the car as a 'magnificent example.' The seller, @nxster26, also emphasized the car's exceptional maintenance history, noting that it has been taken care of in ways most owners wouldn't typically do, suggesting that it has been meticulously documented from its service history. Overall, the car received numerous compliments on its aesthetics and value as a collectible.
Neutral: Several comments provided neutral insights and additional information on the vehicle's history and specifications. @berfinroy discussed the nomenclature used by Rolls-Royce in their order confirmation letters, noting a distinction between 'saloon' and 'coupé.' @Pikal and @smackalino both commented on the duality of owning older luxury cars, including maintenance needs and the experience of driving them. @Luz_do_sol provided detailed production data, underscoring the rarity and unique features of this two-door saloon version of the Silver Shadow. The dialogue among the users revealed a community of enthusiasts deeply engaged in understanding the vehicle, showcasing both appreciation and analytical discussions about its condition and historical significance.
Negative: Despite the car’s many praises, some comments raised concerns about its reliability and maintenance issues associated with classic Rolls-Royce vehicles. @OWLBYRD mentioned potential concerns regarding previous problems noted in the vehicle's history, leading to questions about its current state. @smackalino expressed skepticism based on personal experiences with similar cars, noting common issues such as electrical failures and the need for constant maintenance, while also recounting significant repair expenses associated with the ownership of vintage vehicles. Additionally, some users pointed out that the car's quirky characteristics might deter those looking for a straightforward driving experience, as highlighted by @DaveD and others. Overall, a few users advised caution and underscored the necessity of deep knowledge and care when considering buying such a classic.
|
1979 International Harvester Scout II Selective Edition 304 4×4
J0062JGD25495
Lot 200619
Private Party
 |
Positive: @leekmd (The Seller) shares their positive experiences with the Scout, mentioning that they have owned it for the past seven years, enjoying its reliability and the drive it offers. @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as a "magnificent maroon Maryland Scout" and adds that it is a tremendous specimen. @tlcamg notes that the Scout is in great shape, expressing fondness for the Selective Edition's comfort features, while others like @JohnieKickass reminisce about having a similar vehicle in the past as their first car, indicating a lasting affection for this make and model.
Neutral: Several commenters dive into specific features of the vehicle, such as @jrhyno inquiring about the towing capacity, with @kcatx providing information that the maximum weight recommended for a Scout II is 5,000 lbs. The discussion also touches on factory specifications, with @leekmd confirming that the Scout indeed has Dana 44 axles. There are also practical inquiries such as @CHaas asking if a hardtop could be added without issues related to the soft top hardware, illustrating the interest in customization.
Negative: Some concern arises regarding the vehicle's Selective Edition attributes, with @Firedog53 questioning the existence of this edition due to a lack of personal recollection. @ArchSail points out that while the vehicle started as a Selective Edition, much of the original package features have been replaced. This indicates a potential loss of the original character that some might have valued. Additionally, @leekmd mentions that the Scout has a soft top, potentially disappointing those who were hoping for a hardtop option.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters wholeheartedly appreciate the vehicle's aesthetics and performance, with @gfkeph calling it a "Nice looking Z" and @rpayette expressing strong affection for the Nissan Z series, mentioning previously owning three Nissans with the impressive V-6 engine. @Craven highlights the fun and spirited driving experience the car offers, indicating a preference for it over competitors like the Audi TT.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the vehicle's history and sales process. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) clarifies that this is not a Bring a Trailer alumni vehicle and invites potential buyers to visit their dealership in Douglassville, PA, or arrange remote inspections. They detail the logistics of buying and shipping the car, mentioning various transport options and costs for interested parties like @kbarros and @whitelinen.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition have also been raised; @Mkark21 notes visible wear on the middle console, while @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) responds that such wear is common in this model but can be fixed relatively easily. This potential repair issue reflects a broader concern regarding the longevity and maintenance of the vehicle's interior quality.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's attractive Nightblue color, which seems to shift hues under different lighting conditions, making it stand out from other common colors like black or gray. @GDogg remarked on its beauty, while @mrjirey echoed the sentiment from personal experience. It was also noted that the vehicle has a good stack of maintenance done, including newer brakes and tires, suggesting a well-maintained car that has been cared for during the seller's ownership. The seller, @castlecombemotorsports, highlighted that the car is a higher-performance SUV that has taken most of its depreciation, indicating it offers good value for prospective buyers.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the vehicle's functionality and capabilities rather than on its aesthetics. @Descanuck inquired about its off-road capabilities, which prompted responses discussing the Macan's features like the adjustable ride height via the PASM system and the presence of an 'Off Road' button. @Pace_Adorno clarified that, while the vehicle is more capable than expected off-road, it is still best suited for less rugged paths. @castlecombemotorsports confirmed he had used the vehicle in snowy conditions with success but acknowledged a lack of extensive off-roading experience. Discussions regarding the specifics of the car included inquiries about maintenance history and wheel options.
Negative: Conversely, some comments raised concerns about the Macan's actual off-road performance. @polopolo described their own negative experience with the Macan on challenging terrain, stating it falls short compared to more robust vehicles like a Defender or Wrangler, suggesting that the Macan is primarily designed for on-road use. Additionally, there were practical concerns regarding the vehicle, such as questions from @nt1992 regarding past smoking use and the condition of the panoramic roof, indicating that potential buyers might be wary about previous usage or maintenance issues. Overall, these negative sentiments pointed toward a cautionary stance for prospective buyers regarding off-road capability and previous care.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the highly original and well-maintained condition of the RS4, highlighting its extensive $20,000 maintenance history since 2023. @p1_motorcars_ltd touts the vehicle as a 'turn-key option' and appreciates the sound quality enhancement provided by the Capristo Exhaust, which is deemed by enthusiasts as the ultimate exhaust system for this model. Previous owner @Lonely_Driver confirms the car's excellent mechanical condition and overall presentation, adding credibility to the seller's claims and emphasizing a rare 'stripper spec' feature without additional options.
Neutral: Several comments note key features or missing elements in the vehicle, such as the absence of a premium package and Bluetooth audio, which @Lonely_Driver mentions was not originally present. There are inquiries regarding the vehicle's past issues, maintenance history, and specifics about the clutch and DRC suspension, with @p1_motorcars_ltd addressing these queries and assuring that the vehicle has been well cared for under their ownership. The conversation also touches on potential minor aesthetic repairs needed, such as a sagging headliner, with various cost estimates suggested by different users.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, there are concerns raised regarding the vehicle's mechanical integrity, such as the potential for an exhaust leak noted by @Neal376, and questions about the history of the clutch and DRC suspension by @Kerney6677. Additionally, @ripper996 mentions the car has 110,000 miles and questions its reserve, suggesting a wary stance on the vehicle's valuation. The absence of documented major repairs or upgrades, like the speakers or head unit mentioned by @Pwe312 and @Lonely_Driver, also contributes to a cautious perspective on the vehicle's appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @bloominguez described the car as absolutely gorgeous and noted a personal connection with a similar model. @DaltonAnd shared fond memories of owning a similar car, emphasizing their desire to buy one again, thus positioning the vehicle as a nostalgic favorite among enthusiasts. @Vtec4ever characterized it as the ultimate commute vehicle, indicating its practicality and appeal for everyday use. Furthermore, @williamarbelo37 (The Seller) highlighted the car's impressive service records, stating that it has been fully maintained by one Acura dealer and is presented as a clean, non-modified example with low mileage, which appeals to potential buyers looking for authenticity.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @noroads88mph and @tk15, raised concerns and inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition, including questions about the front bumper, potential repaint, and evidence of the vehicle being resprayed. @Jeronomo pointed out various overspray issues and requested additional photos and videos that would clarify the car's details, reflecting a general need among interested buyers for more transparency about the vehicle’s history. @williamarbelo37 (The Seller) was responsive, encouraging further inquiries and stating he could provide details and additional photos, attempting to maintain communication with potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects, there were notable criticisms from commenters like @tk15 and @brokendrum, who questioned the seller's transparency regarding the vehicle's history, specifically referring to the discrepancies in ownership and auction sales data. @tk15 pointed out that while the seller claims the vehicle hasn't been modified, he indicated that the car's repaint and replacement wheels contradicted that assertion. Additionally, @brokendrum challenged the seller's claims and raised concerns about the credibility of the information provided, creating doubt among other bidders. Overall, the mix of buyer skepticism and seller defensiveness may deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Roundfender provided detailed insights into the vehicle's specifications, confirming that the replacement motor and the spare motor appear to be B16B 1.6 engines, consistent with the US-spec 1959-1961 PV544. Furthermore, @Roundfender noted the presence of high-mount bolt holes on the B-pillars, suggesting that seatbelts would have been standard on these cars, which would be a reassuring detail for potential buyers concerned about safety features. @tyler_allen (The Seller) confirmed that the spare engine is indeed the original engine from the car, adding credibility to the vehicle's authenticity.
Neutral: Several users expressed a desire for more information regarding the vehicle's engine. @chrisjul specifically asked for details about the engine's age and its origins, while also commenting that the installation seems smaller than factory specifications. @Thatch inquired if the spare engine was the original one and requested information about its displacement. The discussions on engines indicate a shared curiosity among other users about the vehicle's mechanical history and integrity.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding safety features, particularly the factory-installed three-point safety belts. @Mordizzle questioned the absence of these belts and referred to the need for clarity on when they were introduced. @bobgreenman highlighted that adding seatbelts back into the design could pose challenges without proper pillar reinforcement, indicating potential worries for buyers about modifying the vehicle to meet safety standards. Overall, the absence of clear information about crucial safety mechanisms could deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The 2013 Porsche Cayenne Diesel is presented as a clean and well-kept vehicle offered with no reserve, indicating a confidence in its quality by @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller). Commenter @DaveTea expresses satisfaction with their own Cayenne, highlighting its fun driving experience and performance, which sets it apart from typical SUVs. This feedback reinforces the excellent balance of luxury and efficiency that the vehicle promises to its next owner.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding specific maintenance aspects of the vehicle, such as the history of the windshield replacement raised by @CottonClark and @JJTOO's questions about service records for the transfer case. Additionally, @1972Dino246gts asks about the PCM, and @Manute inquires about potential leaks and requests more pictures of the suspension area, suggesting a thorough evaluation by potential buyers to ensure the vehicle's condition meets their expectations.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's past, particularly the earlier damages that necessitated repainting of the hood and front bumper after the removal of an old clear bra, as mentioned by @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller). Additionally, @Manute's observations about potential staining on plastic covers suggest there may be underlying issues worth investigating further. The lack of clarity regarding service records for key components could deter some buyers, as highlighted in the comments.
|
|
|