Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: @billyblyth praised the Prey cars, highlighting their quality and real provenance as they are original Auburn vehicles rebodied to Speedster specifications. @djimbe commented positively, suggesting that the ACD groupings would welcome this car since it's 'real' even with its modifications. @boaboyoz expressed admiration for the car's aesthetics, calling it fabulous and good-looking. @rollsroyce admired the color combination and noted how well the top fits, suggesting that the car is a good choice among speedsters. @theforce88 also chimed in, wishing the seller good luck with the car sale.
Neutral: 59caddyman (The Seller) provided detailed information about the vehicle, including its restoration history, specifications, and unique features. He mentioned the model and welcome any further questions from interested parties. He clarified the car's title, body style, and material of the running boards in response to inquiries from @msark, @CKart, and @Sniff38, showcasing transparency and engagement with potential buyers. The comments also indicated a level of interest in the car's original design elements, such as the original Auburn chassis, supporting the historical value of the vehicle.
Negative: @Sniff38 raised questions regarding the materials used for the running boards and whether they were original to the car, suggesting some uncertainty about the car's authenticity. This inquiry may reflect concerns about modifications as well as the lack of clarity in the car's presentation. Although there were mainly positive comments, the request for more photos of the trunk and questions about specific features indicated that some prospective buyers were looking for additional assurance about the car's condition.
 |
 |
Positive: The comments on the vehicle highlight its exceptional qualities with several users praising its stunning design and performance. @boaboyoz describes the Sport Gray Metallic 992.1 Sport Classic as fantastic and super stylish, emphasizing its cool aesthetic. @Jax echoes these sentiments, claiming it to be the most beautiful modern-day Porsche 911 and lauding its lines and manual rear drive turbo as a source of driving excitement. The overall sentiment from commenters like @HeavyTank77 and @kevinstoys reflects a shared admiration for the vehicle, seeing it as a blend of beauty and performance making it an ideal investment car.
Neutral: There are diverse opinions regarding the modifications on the car, specifically about the number decals. @Serj expresses a preference for the vehicle without the numbers, suggesting it might enhance its appearance. However, @Jax points out that the numbers are decals that can easily be removed, which @wasd confirms as the seller, noting that the stripes are painted and cannot be taken off. Some commenters like @TexasMule and @RussMcD3 provide practical insights into removing these decals, indicating a mixed but solution-oriented discussion on the customization of the car.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming positivity, some comments express skepticism or discontent regarding the ownership practices of such luxury vehicles. @goldenbear53 questions the restraint of only driving the car 258 miles in two years, a sentiment mirrored by @porsche1986, who mentions the potential for such expensive investments to remain garages rather than on the road. @curated queries about the safety of decal removal, indicating a concern about preserving the car's finish. Overall, there is a sense of apprehension about how owners might choose to use these high-end cars, with some suggesting they are more collectibles than practical vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlight the impressive modifications and performance of the vehicle. @HealeyRick mentions desirable features like rack and pinion steering and front disc brakes, estimating a power output of about 375 hp. @randylasaac, who inspected the vehicle, praises the exceptional build quality, noting the reinforced crossmember support, high-quality wiring, and the overall condition of the interior and exterior components. Other users, like @BloodyHell, compliment the aesthetics of the fenders and wheels, expressing excitement over the car's potential performance.
Neutral: The seller, @54Healey, actively engages with potential buyers, providing clarifications about the vehicle's features and answering questions regarding modifications and car condition. Some commenters, like @jbbush, appreciate the overall stance of the car, while @FGinn seeks assurance about the frame's condition, indicating a common interest in detailed visual inspections. The inclusion of a driving video is commonly requested, with users like @pdxbryan suggesting it might help illustrate the car's capabilities and attract buyers.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition surface in the comments, particularly around potential rust and structural integrity. @tredinuck points out what he initially misidentified as a broken mounting bracket, and @JoeVantage raises issues with previous repairs, calling for more detailed photos of vulnerable areas. Additionally, some comments reflect apprehension regarding the modifications made, such as the rack and pinion system, with @boyracer466 warning about possible challenges with steering geometry. Commenters like @Pdigwig express a more critical take on the vehicle's reliability, referencing common issues associated with British cars.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the beauty and desirability of the Aston Martin Rapide. @Astonman76 mentions that his 2012 Rapide, similar to the one for sale, has garnered constant admiration from onlookers and describes it as a vehicle to keep forever. @Rodeo adds that, despite owning many nice cars, none have received as many compliments as the Rapide, emphasizing its stunning appearance and impressive performance. @pmsong2 appreciates the thoroughness of @jjf112 (The Seller) in providing extras like headphones and keys, indicating the car is well-cared for and a complete package.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussion about the vehicle without strong opinions. @SteveStunning inquires about the headliner, while @graciata asks for recent service receipts. @nepcom seeks clarification about a specific connection in the pictures, demonstrating interest but remaining neutral regarding the vehicle's qualities. Furthermore, @onethumb notes a minor concern regarding the center dash's leather, displaying an interest in its condition without overt negativity.
Negative: There are minor concerns raised among the comments, particularly regarding maintenance and features. @Stuey555 questions the reason for the seller putting the car up for sale after only a short ownership period, suggesting potential doubts. Additionally, @onethumb points out a minor issue with leather pulling in the center dash, which is common for southern California cars, although the overall tone remains positive. There are no major negative comments about the car itself, but inquiries regarding smogging and service records indicate some potential buyers are cautious.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the overall condition and modifications of the vehicle. @SNATCHOLOPHIGUS noted it was 'one clean M3!' while @wem5310 expressed that it 'looks like it could be fun.' @Jpfindlay reminisced about their own positive experience with a previous M3, calling it 'an absolute hoot to drive.' Various users, including @E_F_III and @RTWaag44, highlighted the vehicle's sharp aesthetics and impressive OEM plus build features. Comments like @thhancock's detailed appreciation for the supercharger setup showcased a deep knowledge and love for the engineering behind the vehicle, alongside mentions of how rare and enjoyable the car is to drive, further enhancing its desirability.
Neutral: Several users engaged with the technical aspects of the M3's supercharger setup, with @ThrottleHaus asking for more information about the charging system. @JBP69 (The Seller) provided thorough details, including an installation manual and dyno results, fostering an informative dialogue around the technical performance of the vehicle. Additionally, @kylezhen inquired about keys and @bmfybs raised various practical questions concerning oil changes and wear, indicating an interest in the car's maintenance history. Overall, these discussions contributed to a constructive examination of the vehicle, blending enthusiasm with practical considerations.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns about potential issues with the M3. @m3wong questioned whether the car would pass emissions tests, highlighting a common concern among buyers in certain regions. @eternoj lamented the potential expense of the vehicle, while @DaveTea emphasized the high cost associated with owning what is touted as 'the best supercharger' for the model. @madmac527 brought attention to the radio functionality, asking about a code, which could signal a minor point of irritation for potential buyers. Overall, these comments reflected the apprehensions some users had regarding the vehicle's practicality and associated costs.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered praise for its aesthetic appeal, with @Calamari_Jujutsu deeming it a beautiful car and @stugottz expressing admiration for T-birds and commenting that it looks like a nice project for someone. The seller, @autobahnjovi, shares a sentimental connection to the car, identifying it as a source of joy and a part of classic car history from the 60s. Other commenters, such as @CarFoolLane, suggest that it could be a pleasant drive-while-you-restore project, highlighted by its nickname 'Flair Bird' with references supporting its distinction in car culture.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions about the vehicle's mechanical aspects. @corvettom9 asked the seller for detailed information regarding any mechanical needs and functional issues with the car, to which @autobahnjovi responded, outlining several areas requiring attention such as unresponsive window motors and malfunctioning gauges. Comments regarding the interior color by @cornfieldave noted lighting effects in pictures while @autobahnjovi clarified the appearance was due to natural lighting rather than aftermarket tints. The technical identification of the vehicle's nickname was discussed by @CarFoolLane, @FEFrancoD, and @Qvalve, indicating a collective interest in the car's history and specifications.
Negative: There are concerns expressed about the vehicle's condition, specifically by @ifonlyonce who raised doubts regarding a potentially bad weld or crack on the frame, prompting @autobahnjovi to clarify that it was merely an optical illusion due to shadowing, rather than an actual defect. The seller disclosed several mechanical issues, such as difficulties with the window operation, gauges, and transmission, which suggests that the vehicle may not be immediately roadworthy as is. Comments highlight the need for restoration and repairs, indicating that prospective buyers should be prepared to invest time and resources into bringing the car back to optimal condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle's color and luxurious features. @lincolnsandcaddies emphasized that the car offers a nice departure from the commonly seen black, white, and charcoal options, while @gscharnagl and @JustaGlitch praised the interior design and overall aesthetics of the car. @DarrellR reflected fondly on a similar model he once owned, indicative of the enduring appeal of the BMW 7 series. The seller, @2FAM, highlighted the extensive features of the 2016 BMW 750i xDrive, including a panoramic sky lounge, heated and ventilated seats, and a premium sound system, which further attracted positive mentions.
Neutral: Some comments provided neutral observations about the vehicle. @MatsHerr raised a question regarding the discrepancies in tire sizes, while @C0Mb0BrEaKeR requested specific details about maintenance and previous service records. The seller, @2FAM, engaged with these inquiries, addressing the wheels' changes and offering to provide transparency about service history, thus demonstrating a commitment to customer engagement and information sharing. Additionally, @MikeyG1 expressed concern about potential delamination issues but received reassurance from the seller about the car's headliner.
Negative: However, not all comments were entirely positive. @rourkeh pointed out a concerning issue with flashing lights in a driving video, questioning whether it indicated a technical fault, although @Scott_S clarified that the issue stemmed from the camera's shutter speed rather than an actual problem with the car. @MikeyG1 expressed worries about the car's exposure to Florida heat affecting its condition. This reveals a level of skepticism among potential buyers regarding the car's ability to maintain its value and performance under varying conditions.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's cleanliness and attractive restoration, with @Vtec4ever noting its impressive condition reminiscent of his own 1953 CJ 3B. @Nukken1 appreciated the Resto-mod features and highlighted how well the overall build echoed the style of classic CJs. @fsacb3 called it a beautiful jeep, while @cpiercy admired the aesthetic of a 'Gentleman's ranch jeep', complimenting the hybrid nature of original elements alongside modern upgrades.
Neutral: The seller, @insite94, tirelessly addressed questions, provided context about features, and offered insights into the vehicle's capabilities. He confirmed the maximum speed of about 45mph was appropriate for cruising, reiterating the conscientious care put into maintaining the vehicle since its rebuild and admitting the build choices were made considering supply chain constraints during its restoration. Additionally, the seller acknowledged existing minor mechanical issues but assured prospective buyers that the vehicle runs reliably, thus maintaining transparency.
Negative: However, some commenters raised concerns, such as @CDehne inquiring about the absence of rearview mirrors and the unconventional use of a pool noodle for the windshield support. @Bopfletch highlighted potential leaks from the axle and asked for clarity on known mechanical problems, prompting the seller to clarify that while there had been some minor leaks, most were now resolved. @phantom309 jokingly suggested altering the build further, indicating that not all feedback was entirely positive.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and potential for enjoyment. @Lengrep praised it as 'the one to buy,' while @rackops noted that the Phaeton is visually striking and has a nice clean look. @DrJacquesStrappe described it as a 'beaut,' recognizing its similar charm to his own 1929 Phaeton. Many are excited about the car's prospects at shows and parades and see it as a great option for someone looking for a Model A.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the historical aspects, production numbers, and color schemes of the vehicle. @Leif_in_Calif pointed out that the Model A Phaetons were low production due to their exposed body style, which was less desirable in the late 1920s. @prescue questioned the authenticity of the car's color, while @Davey_Jones clarified that the Model A featured various black finishes and that the famous saying about color applied primarily to Model T vehicles. The discussion included inquiries about features and whether certain repairs had been made appropriately.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding starting issues and the adjustments required to ensure proper functionality. @Lengrep noted potential problems with starting and running, suggesting that improper use of choke or spark could be contributing factors. @JustaHonda echoed this, asking for clarifications on adjustments made by @RussellCrump's mechanic. @DrJacquesStrappe humorously mentioned a physical reaction to the exhaust in the start-up video, indicating potential issues that might need addressing. Overall, there seems to be caution regarding the vehicle's operational reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle's ruggedness and capabilities. @sodo-moto appreciated seeing the Unimog featured on BaT and shared useful links for further specifications. @DrJacquesStrappe passionately stated a desire to own the vehicle, indicating a strong attraction to its unique features. @hutchco (The Seller) provided detailed specifications, which created transparency and trust in the sale process, and articulated that the vehicle is street legal in NH, which is a positive aspect for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters asked for specific dimensions and features of the vehicle, indicating a well-rounded interest from potential buyers. @bpeverest and @henryr inquired about the vehicle's size and towing capacity, while @schimanski asked technical questions regarding the transmission and engine functionality. Many of these comments showed typical concerns and inquiries that buyers have when considering a large and specialized vehicle like this Unimog.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding the vehicle's limitations, particularly from @Thisusername4sale who expressed uncertainty about using it for purposes beyond farming due to its off-road nature. @blackjak71 asked about the last hydraulic fluid change, pointing to possible maintenance worries. Overall, while the comments were largely positive, there were hints of apprehension regarding various aspects of the vehicle's capabilities and history.
|
 |
Positive: @JJ.eff expressed excitement about the vehicle, indicating a willingness to fly in and drive it back to New York if they win the bidding, showcasing their enthusiasm for the purchase.
Neutral: @DUGEEEFRESH04 asked for a driving video of the vehicle, which suggests they are interested but seeking more visual proof of its capabilities. @60-70sFan requested a specific photo of the driver side kick panel featuring the "For Economical Transportation" plate, indicating curiosity about the vehicle's details. @DUGEEEFRESH04 and @60-70sFan engaged with @Dwells107 regarding additional media related to the vehicle, showing an active interest in assessing its condition.
Negative: @LonesomeLandy expressed frustration over not receiving a timely response to their direct message sent on Saturday, inquiring if they would be receiving answers to their questions. This impatience could reflect poorly on the seller's communication and responsiveness.
|
 |
Positive: @FastCarLover74 expressed admiration for the vehicle with heart emojis, indicating a strong visual appeal. @CPP1 also referred to the car as beautiful, showcasing appreciation from viewers as they follow the sale. The seller, @5KLegacy, highlighted the vehicle's positive attributes, such as a new battery installed recently, full service and inspection by a Ford dealer, and the pleasure of driving the car, promising more videos to demonstrate its performance.
Neutral: @Ralphpratt1959 and @Jbar1 raised concerns regarding potential rodent damage, asking for pictures and information about any damage to wiring insulation. The seller, @5KLegacy, reassured potential buyers that there is no significant damage, emphasizing the car was stored properly and the rodent issue was minimal. With comments about the 'mouse blocker' from @NVGT350 and @68Vet, there are discussions about preventative measures for the issue.
Negative: @OBagMan pointed out the firewall damage visible in the photos, leading to a focus on potential issues that could deter some buyers. While the seller attempted to downplay the extent of the damage, there remains an underlying concern among commenters regarding the rodent presence and its consequences. Overall, some comments reflect unease about the car's history, potentially affecting its desirability.
|
 |
Positive: @2011SLSAMG remarked on the vehicle's sporty nature combined with its economical V-6 engine. @Ycbmsma acknowledged the car's appeal while expressing curiosity about the missing engine emblem, suggesting thorough engagement with the listing. @JORA_Imports (The Seller) emphasized that the vehicle has been meticulously cared for and maintained, offering a blend of luxury and performance, making it an excellent option for potential buyers. Additionally, @JORA_Imports highlighted their commitment to transparency and customer satisfaction throughout their sales process.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the details of the vehicle's specifications and features, such as @classicguy57 inquiring about the trim package, fog lights, and the type of heated seats. @newcarpro provided detailed information on the vehicle's build and service history, while others like @Phil_Holland and @lunarconcepts sought clarifications regarding potential leaks and paintwork issues. Though these comments indicate a level of interest in specifics, they do not carry a strong emotional load, reflecting more curiosity than enthusiasm or criticism.
Negative: @Ycbmsma raised a concern regarding whether the rear hatch had been repainted following collision damage, suggesting a potential red flag about the vehicle's condition. @lunarconcepts also questioned the quality of the paintwork, indicating a need for transparency in repairs. While @JORA_Imports (The Seller) countered these claims by asserting the vehicle's quality and the minor nature of repairs, the initial comments highlight some hesitation among potential buyers about the car's history.
|
 |
Positive: @theforce88 complimented the car by saying it is beautiful and wished the seller good luck. @Bordeaux appreciated the car's aesthetic quality, referring to it as 'another gorgeous 062 Corvette' and noting the overall top-notch condition, despite some concerns about the valve cover. Additionally, @mairagiraldo suggested that the age of the tires shouldn't be a major concern for someone purchasing such a classic car, emphasizing its desirability.
Neutral: @BMacalpine, the seller, responded to inquiries about the car's history and condition. They noted that the car has always been red and provided information about its title history, stating that both the seller and the previous owner did not title it, conforming to New Hampshire regulations. Furthermore, they discussed the valve covers, mentioning that they possess the original ones and will check their condition.
Negative: @Noisyboyz expressed confusion about how the seller could drive the car for 2,800 miles without ever having titled it, questioning the practicality of that situation. @jturner challenged the idea that the valve covers are rare, asserting that they are readily available in the market and dismissing the concern for their rarity. @DN1228 raised a safety concern regarding the tire manufacturing date, suggesting that the tires might be too old for high-speed driving, while others echoed that new rubber might be necessary.
|
 |
Positive: @BULLITT65 commented on the overall appearance of the car, noting its potential despite the engine issues. @JimmoVette expressed admiration for the vehicle's look, highlighting its appeal even with the repaint. @Carfisher13 found the Chevelle to be visually appealing and inquired about videos to see it in action. Additionally, @RMQ333 mentioned the desirability of the car despite the current bid as a reserve auction, indicating a belief that it is valuable.
Neutral: Many commenters, including @ssterry and @Agonza, shared professional opinions regarding the engine's stamping authenticity and assembly details, suggesting that closer inspection may clarify the engine's history. @FullSizeL72 stated that while the stamping raises questions, the original engine casting date fits the car's assembly timeline, creating a mix of hope and skepticism among enthusiasts. Conversely, @02fanatic noted the normal rear gearing found in '67 Chevelles, and mentioned that the color change might not affect the car's value significantly, highlighting the personal tastes of different collectors.
Negative: @randy1957 raised numerous concerns about inaccuracies in the car's components, including issues with the engine stamp and other mismatched parts that detract from its authenticity. @pghpainter criticized the listing's details about the brake system, which he claims was inaccurate, along with observations about physical flaws in the car's exterior and window mechanism. @jeffschevelle asserted firmly that the engine's stamps are definitely not original, contributing to a general apprehension about the car's authenticity while contradicting the positive sentiments expressed by others.
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics, the seller, highlights that the 2011 Mercedes-Benz E350 Cabriolet is part of a trusted inventory sourced from private sellers. They emphasize their commitment to transparent transactions and boast a high rating of 4.9 out of 5.0 on Google Reviews, showcasing numerous satisfied customers. They encourage potential buyers to reach out for more information and welcome inspections, providing a reassuring atmosphere for interested bidders.
Neutral: Several comments have noted an inconsistency regarding the vehicle's color as reported by Carfax. @no.radar pointed out that while three separate Carfax statements from Florida indicate the vehicle is white, the VIN decode shows it as black. This discrepancy raises questions about the reliability of the Carfax reports, which others may want to consider before making a purchase decision.
Negative: There are concerns about the accuracy of the vehicle's reported history due to the conflicting information from Carfax. This inconsistency might lead potential buyers to hesitate, as it could suggest issues with the vehicle’s documentation or history. The discrepancy in color noted by @no.radar reinforces doubts about the vehicle’s authenticity and raises concerns over transparency from the seller.
|
 |
Positive: @Nisals (The Seller) provided detailed and transparent responses to numerous inquiries, boosting buyer confidence. The seller confirmed that the AC in the vehicle blows cold, which is a significant plus for potential buyers. Several commenters, including @Mcoming, praised the car's tasteful options, highlighting features that enhance its appeal.
Neutral: There was some discussion about the tariff implications surrounding importing the vehicle into the U.S. @Nisals clarified that, since the car originated in the U.S., the tariff situation can be complex and varies. Commenters, such as @e9shaw and @abbcaz, engaged in a dialogue about tariff rates and regulations, emphasizing the uncertainty around the application of duties on used vehicles versus new ones.
Negative: Several concerns were raised regarding existing issues and the vehicle's history. @storhund pointed out lingering questions regarding unresolved problems noted in previous service orders, particularly around the electrical system and tire wear. Additionally, transparency was called into question, with @Flared_Fenders seeking clearer documentation on certain repairs and conditions, while others expressed apprehension about the tariff implications, with @jnkpro12 expressing discomfort at the potential 25% tariff impact.
|
 |
Positive: @PAZ (The Seller) emphasizes the ease and convenience of using the trailer for outdoor adventures, citing a smooth towing experience with a Bronco. The trailer is stated to pull straight and smooth, and has proven to be capable on trails without any complaints. Other commenters, like @jake67rs and @ElliottAlvis, highlight how the trailer is an excellent entry point for those interested in overlanding, allowing users to test the hobby without committing to a full vehicle build. The setup has received praise for making trips enjoyable, with users noting the wheels and tires as perfect for off-road use.
Neutral: @PAZ provides detailed information about the tent's functionality, acknowledging some design limitations such as the inability to mount items on the sides and the closure issues with side zippers. Commenters like @HairOnFire and @Assam ask questions about accessing the tent and its load capacity, suggesting interest but also seeking clarification. There are mixed feelings about the tent's practicality, indicating it works well yet poses some challenges, particularly for those who may need easy nighttime access.
Negative: Concerns have been raised by commenters regarding the tent's design and durability, with @Spider_Mike noting potential issues for sleepwalkers or nighttime bathroom needs. @PAZ discloses some repairs needed on the tent, such as pinched zippers and a hole in one of the screens, which may deter potential buyers. Additionally, while some users appreciate the trailer's capability, there are implied doubts about how well the tent accommodates extra items during travel, suggesting a need for improvements in its design.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the FJ-40 for its aesthetic appeal and quality of build. @goldenbear53 noted how 'sweet' it looks, while @Toadster88 expressed that it is 'so nice'. @mfontaine2008 and @phantom309 also shared their admiration, calling it impressive and suggesting it should fetch a good price. @boaboyoz called it a 'lovely Logan FJ40' in beautiful blue and complimented the build, as did @wanderlust2, celebrating 'all the right choices' made in the vehicle's restoration. The seller, @Charliebackus, received positive feedback for the effort and care put into the truck over the years, especially its transformation from a trail vehicle to a show-worthy model.
Neutral: Commenters had inquiries about specific features and parts regarding the vehicle. @ResoMad asked if the engine was new upon installation, indicating curiosity about its condition. @Gio1966 and @DB60 requested video content, such as driving videos or a clip of the car running, showing an interest in visual proof of the vehicle's functionality. Additionally, @mudpaws72 and @Piloto66 posed technically focused questions about brake components and the fuel tank system, respectively, seeking more detailed information about the FJ-40's specifications.
Negative: A few constructive criticisms were made regarding the vehicle's design elements. @Chamba suggested that moving the spare tire to an off-center position would enhance the truck's appearance, indicating a preference to avoid a 'cheap-like CJ look' from the rear. Overall, while the comments were largely positive, this input demonstrates that there is always room for improvement, even in highly admired builds.
|
 |
Positive: @greenerdays11 (The Seller) engaged positively with the BAT community, encouraging inquiries about the vehicle. He provided responses regarding the vehicle’s top operation and confirmed that it functions as designed, as well as addressing questions about the condition and mileage of the tires, noting that they are from 2017 and have only 5k miles. He also offered additional information in response to requests for details about the car's condition, such as a cold start video.
Neutral: @DG78 asked for a top operation video which @greenerdays11 later acknowledged by uploading the requested material. @Sunbird77 inquired about the date codes on the tires and their tread wear, receiving a clear response confirming the tires' condition. @JohnChecki contributed to the discussion by asking about the last service of the Automatic Body Suspension, reflecting an interest in maintenance history without expressing a strong opinion either way.
Negative: @jimlam56 raised concerns about potential oil seepage, pointing out visible fluid in a photo, and requested further investigation, which might suggest hesitance about the vehicle's condition. @greenerdays11 responded by stating his observations of no apparent issues beneath the vehicle and suggesting that the fluid may have been residual from a recent wash. This back-and-forth indicates some skepticism about the vehicle's maintenance aspects.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle's impressive build, particularly the LS7 engine swap. @Roth517 exclaimed about the power of the LS7, showing distinct admiration for the modifications made to the car. @WCG mentioned this conversion as one of the coolest they've seen, highlighting the blend of two beloved car models. Numerous commenters, including @Tposs001 and @jeffinsd, voiced their enthusiasm, calling the car 'sweet' and emphasizing its alluring nature. The seller, @Bfast, also conveyed his affection for the car and implied it was well worth the investment, hoping others feel the same passionate connection.
Neutral: There were some inquiries about the car's condition and modifications, with @jcmc97 asking why the vehicle had minimal mileage since the last auction. @Stick_Shift_Nick posed a direct question to the seller about this limited usage, speculating on the reasons behind such short ownership. Commentators showed curiosity about features like the non-functional traction control, with @Becauseracecar pointing this out and seeking clarification on necessary repairs. The seller responded to these questions and engaged with the community, indicating an openness to address concerns, illustrating a balanced interaction with potential bidders.
Negative: Conversely, some commenters expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle's usability, with concerns about its power being intimidating, as noted by @spitel0rd, who wondered about potential handling issues. @BloodyHell humorously referred to the need for 'brown pants' when driving it, hinting at its challenging nature due to the substantial power increase. @Roadrunner_CT found errors in the current listing and sought specific details about what has been done to the car under the current ownership, pointing out the potential lack of clarity in the auction's presentation. Overall, a few negative sentiments surfaced regarding the appraised risks associated with driving such a powerful, modified vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz praises the key attributes of the vehicle, calling it a "wonderful white Bronco" and complimenting its delightful build that stands out in the eyes of enthusiasts. @Nickgplv also appreciates the Bronco, noting it embodies what a classic Bronco should represent, highlighting its tasteful aftermarket enhancements without overwhelming it with excessive modifications. Additionally, @KTDreemz describes the vehicle as a nice-looking specimen, reinforcing the sentiment of satisfaction and excitement about its presence in the market.
Neutral: @Hipojoe (The Seller) shares personal background information, explaining that he is recovering from surgery and is eager to give potential buyers insights into the Bronco. He emphasizes the vehicle's unique attributes, particularly its rarity as a First Gen Bronco within the Explorer/Sport package of 1972, suggesting potential buyers might want to consider its distinct features seen in the MARTI report. He answers inquiries about the vehicle's components, such as the shifter and door panels, without taking a definitive stance on their current condition while mentioning past customization.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle’s condition surface as @Flyfisen inquires about the functionality of the gauges and the modifications made to the door panels, indicating that the original specifications may not be fully intact. Questions about the vehicle's drivability are raised by @McC_Mason, who expresses a desire for reassurance regarding the front end and steering components, seeking confidence in the vehicle's performance for freeway driving. Although there is overall admiration for the Bronco, these inquiries hint at uncertainty regarding its operational reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @Lash (The Seller) mentioned that the rear tires of the vehicle are brand new and that a hard wired trickle charger has been added, which adds convenience for car maintenance. @TedLitvin noted that the SSR is a great road car that is well planted and moderately fast, implying that it has good performance dynamics for enthusiasts. @DONUTFORME shared a positive recollection about owning a 2005 model, stating it was a fun car and offered good value for money, especially after upgrading the stereo system and adding a K&N cold air intake.
Neutral: @newcarpro provided detailed vehicle information including the model specifics, delivery date, and various features, indicating a thorough background of the SSR. @Whitetailhunter asked about operational aspects such as the vehicle's functionality and the age of the tires, showing interest in its condition without implying a strong bias toward either side. @JacksonsTrucks asked about potential upgrades from Simple Engineering, suggesting a community interest in enhancing the vehicle's performance.
Negative: @Lash (The Seller) disclosed that while everything works on the SSR, the radio screen is not functional. @TedLitvin expressed dissatisfaction with the vehicle's original horsepower, stating that the LS1 engine at 300 HP was disappointing for his expectations. Overall, the comments reflect a mix of satisfaction balanced with some concerns about specific features and performance aspects.
|
 |
Positive: @EddieNap: Beautiful Mustang, great color. GLWTA. @Bronco6G: Well taken care of example of a great vintage Mustang. @kennymac197: A true "barn find". Love it. @Elmo17: Beautiful vintage '65 from a beautiful part of California - GLWTA! @Segura911: Beautiful Mustang! Congratulations! @Iceman1959: Beautiful car!
Neutral: @REE2: Is the Caspian Blue the original color? Was the vinyl top original? Asking since there is no door tag. @Stangin: Do you know what is wrong with the air conditioning? @broodie: @PPRudy, so the tyres are 14 years old? And the 289 is equipped with a 2bbl. carb? @MachGeezer: Can you post a picture of the door tag? @Parwant2be: As you live by the ocean, what’s the rust situation? Quarter panels? Trunk floor? Rocker panels? Beautiful car. Good luck with the auction. @PPRudy (The Seller): The restoration done on this car was new paint to repair parking lot and gravel/road dings and dents. All the chrome is original except back bumper, which is new. The upholstery and carpet are new too. The undercarriage was not painted or restored, and only mechanical jobs like alignment, brakes, shocks, and bushings have been done.
Negative: @MachGeezer: Do you have any paperwork or info as to which dealership it was originally purchased from, and when? @BlackHawkDave: @Seller Can you provide any pictures of the car pre-restoration? Thanks. @Iceman1959: What happened to the door to make the Data Plate go missing?? @thorofare: @PPRudy, have to agree with @Iceman1959. How did the data plate get removed, if you know? @MattR1032: Not really rust as in old Mustang rust. Solid and sound trunk, no issues.
|
 |
Positive: @Curvette1 appreciates the original Laguna blue but acknowledges that black is a safer choice for maintaining value. @moosehead enjoys the car's drivability and encourages others not to worry about originality since there are many untouched classics available. @Factoid highlights the beauty of the '66 model and expresses confidence in the auction's success, while @MailmanBW suggests that it would be better utilized as a driver rather than kept stationary in a display. @Canman805 praises the car's stance, color, and overall presentation, expressing a sentiment of goodwill for the sale.
Neutral: @Dandrewsgarage (The Seller) provides details about the soft top versus hard top situation and clarifies queries regarding the rear end ratio, confirming it to be 3.55 to 1. @61vet inquires whether the side pipes were a factory feature, and @Dandrewsgarage confirms that they were added later. Additionally, @gw7089 raises a question about the speedometer's erratic behavior, to which @Dandrewsgarage explains that it might be a cable issue but is uncertain about the specific fix.
Negative: @BossHoggDDH raises a concern about the absence of a hardtop. @porsche22 comments on the noticeable negative camber on the right rear wheel, while @PTC57 questions the presence of what appears to be repair work on the driver's side rear quarter panel, which @Dandrewsgarage denies, attributing it to reflections. @ami181 expresses concern over the rear end ratio, prompting clarification, and additional scrutiny is suggested regarding the speedometer issue by @IXIEWTECH.
|
 |
Positive: @allin938 (The Seller) presents the 2016 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350 as an exciting opportunity for bidders looking for a performance vehicle with a visceral driving experience powered by a 5.2-liter "Voodoo" V8 engine. The car is described as tight and responsive, embodying everything expected from a Shelby-badged Mustang. The seller highlights its well-maintained status with 64,000 miles and the attractive offering of no reserve, making it accessible for potential buyers to enjoy this iconic car.
Neutral: Comments from @s197pony and @lionelhutz seek clarification about the car's history and use, suggesting a need for transparency regarding its previous ownership and usage patterns. While some users question the mileage and its impact on daily driving, the seller responds promptly, indicating the vehicle has been driven reasonably and maintained without any significant issues. @SloCalCar brings up the topic of paint condition and general reliability, appreciating the open dialogue with the seller to clarify any concerns about maintenance and performance before bidding.
Negative: There are concerns raised by @S197Pony regarding previous damage, open recalls, and the overall reliability of the vehicle. @NVGT350 mentions that using the GT350 as a daily driver may not be advisable due to tramlining issues. Additionally, @SloCalCar points out potential cosmetic flaws like clear coat failure and questions the oil consumption and general service history. Comments indicate a need for cautious consideration among potential buyers due to these aspects.
|
 |
Positive: @LongiMotorsports highlights that the WAGONBOYTD comments offer reassurance that the vehicle has documented service history, specifically mentioning significant maintenance like chain and crossover services done at 120k miles, and a recent oil change, emphasizing that the car had been well-maintained. The seller appreciates the interest and tries to provide a comprehensive overview of the vehicle's condition, stating that there are no issues with rust due to its California history and that rear brakes were replaced at 103k miles.
Neutral: The seller engages with various commenters to clarify concerns, particularly around the vehicle's timing chain and service records. Comments from @GilbertVehiceServices and @TodBSteward inquire about the timing chain's status, with the seller admitting they don't possess physical records but express understanding of the importance of oil change documentation. Interest in the vehicle is sustained with requests for videos of cold starts and assurances that an effort will be made to accommodate these requests.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the potential issues related to the vehicle's timing chain, as indicated by @GilbertVehiceServices and @TodBSteward, with a note that proper oil change history can alleviate fears of engine failures. @WAGONBOYTD mentions the necessity of an actual 'cold start' to evaluate the chain's condition, indicating skepticism about the seller's claims. @BallCoach also raises questions about possible odors in the interior, which suggests apprehension about the vehicle's overall state.
|
 |
Positive: @Chambers mentioned that the car is actually better than described and sounds awesome, suggesting a high quality and attractive build. @Astonjag complimented the Seven replica, particularly noting the impressive power-to-weight ratio of about 7.33 lb/hp. @iceberg1234 (The Seller) provided detailed information about the car's handling improvements and features such as the electrically heated windshield and comfortable interior for larger drivers.
Neutral: @iceberg1234 (The Seller) offered various technical details about the vehicle's specifications, including the measurements of the oil pan guard and the car's estimated horsepower and weight. They clarified the vehicle's registration status and explained that it has a transferable registration rather than a title, which is typical for older cars in New York. Responses to questions from commenters like @waltnelson and @morrisminiman showcased the Seller's willingness to provide thorough answers about the car's history, dimensions, and construction.
Negative: @59elva raised concerns regarding the expired inspection and whether the car could be safely driven long distances. @Thegreentreefrog expressed confusion over the legitimacy of the 1967 registration, questioning the standards of the vehicle's classification as a kit car. @YaRight speculated that the lack of driving videos might be contributing to the low number of bids on the vehicle, indicating potential buyer hesitance.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed positive views about the vehicle's appeal and upgrades. @Slam105 noted a preference for the 1939 to 1941 Ford pick-ups and commented on the pleasing engine upgrade. @mike_rockwell appreciated the chop, saying it was a nice modification and described the vehicle as a solid driver that seems to perform well on the road. Additionally, @Warrenlu (The Seller) provided reassurance that the truck is in good running condition and is frequently driven, which adds to its value in the eyes of potential buyers.
Neutral: @Warrenlu (The Seller) provided several clarifications regarding the vehicle's details, including its height adjustments to accommodate taller drivers. He also explained the origin of 'THE SAWMILL COLLECTION' as part of an estate liquidation process involving his family’s long-time ownership of a sawmill. The vehicle is used regularly, which explains its less-than-pristine undercarriage, and @Warrenlu indicated that it was recently taken to a show. Comments were also made about air conditioning functionality by @hopalong32, to which @Warrenlu confirmed that it is operational, albeit rarely used in their location.
Negative: There were some concerns raised by commenters regarding the modifications made to the vehicle. @39mercman highlighted the lack of information about the chopped top, emphasizing that this alteration affects the vehicle's standard height which potential buyers should be aware of. Additionally, @DRIVEGUY questioned the cleanliness of the engine bay and undercarriage, suggesting that the truck may not have been showcased properly at car shows due to its appearance. This concern was echoed by others who noted that the presence of dirt indicated it may not have been kept in showroom condition.
|
 |
Positive: @MattE92 praises the uniqueness and cleanliness of the vehicle, expressing hope for a successful auction. @PAEnglish11 agrees, noting the appealing color and interior features. @Cbb1 mentions their love for the color, while @Hoitytoity328 appreciates the specification and assures potential buyers about the remaining factory warranty. The seller, @howS, highlights the sound of the vehicle, its premium color, and its high-performance capabilities, sharing his personal excitement about the model's features.
Neutral: @MattE92 acknowledges that while the vehicle is not a Competition model, it has unique characteristics and normal mileage. The seller, @howS, explains the minor differences between this X5M and its Competition counterpart, detailing aspects such as horsepower and wheel specs. @Hoitytoity328 emphasizes the importance of the DAPP package, suggesting it is a valuable option notably included in this vehicle. @atrunnell admires the color combination, but expresses a desire for more spacious rear seating in the X5 models.
Negative: @Darkness raises concern about potential previous damage, asking for pictures related to a deer incident. The seller, @howS, addresses this, mentioning that there were minor repairs and no structural issues, while also sharing that the damage was caused by a young deer. @cmhjeepguy refers to the damage recorded on the CarFax, indicating it might affect the vehicle's perceived value. Additionally, @atrunnell mentions a desire for more space in the rear seats, hinting at a limitation in comfort for taller passengers.
|
 |
Positive: @Frankieballs expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic by calling it gorgeous, while @RiffRaff mentioned a similar model and color scheme, wishing the seller good luck with the sale (GLWTS). @935DP complimented the clever speaker application seen in the vehicle, and @Worldclassmotorcars, the seller, provided reassurance about the car's functionality, stating it runs and drives as it should, indicating a smooth transaction experience. The seller also shared their extensive experience in the automotive industry, which can add credibility for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several users requested more information about the vehicle's condition and specifics. @LibertyTalk sought to understand the state of the wiring and installation of the radio, while @AvionicsTech pointed out the necessity for new floorboards and asked for pictures of the cabin heater. @Worldclassmotorcars responded positively to these requests, committing to provide additional photos and information regarding the truck's components as well as a video to showcase the car's performance.
Negative: However, the vehicle is noted to have some areas requiring attention, as pointed out by @AvionicsTech's mention of the need for new floorboards. Potential buyers may be cautious regarding these necessary repairs and modifications, which could impact the vehicle's value and overall appeal. The inquiries into the wiring and component functionality suggest that not all aspects of the car are in optimal condition, indicating that some buyers might approach the listing with a degree of scrutiny.
|
 |
Positive: @choicedealsnc2017 (The Seller) has indicated that the A/C is functioning well and that the vehicle has no leaks, which is a positive sign for potential buyers. The seller also shared that the tires are relatively new, dating back to the 42nd week of 2021, which adds to the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: There were inquiries from @Tmoore2024, asking if the car could be seen in person, reflecting a common buyer's interest in inspecting the vehicle before committing to a purchase. Additionally, @kadeer sought more details about the car's history, especially since it had not been driven since 2004, and mentioned several specific technical questions regarding the condition of the A/C and tires.
Negative: While the seller provided positive feedback regarding the car's current condition, the fact that it hasn't been driven since 2004 may raise concerns about overall maintenance and potential hidden issues. This gap in history could lead potential buyers to question the vehicle's reliability despite the seller's reassurances.
|
 |
Positive: @CRUSH noted that it's always cool to see a car that was loved, expressing admiration for the vehicle. @MihirT commented on the excitement of driving the car on local favorite routes, suggesting it offers a thrilling experience. @ajay101 praised the vehicle as a gem, highlighting its incredible red color and the seller's effort in keeping it pristine over almost 20 years.
Neutral: @wbyc1979 reminisced about a scenic driving route enjoyed in the past, connecting it with the current experience of driving the S2000. @Prohnstock (The Seller) provided clarifications about potential issues raised by other commenters, like the battery positioning and the stains in the photos, actively engaging with the community to provide accurate information. @kazeebo appreciated the quick response from the seller regarding additional photos of the blemishes, indicating a positive interaction with the seller.
Negative: @3H0nda0rphans criticized the car for having the wrong battery, while @01red636 pointed out that the car is misclassified as an AP1 instead of an AP2, suggesting that the details may not be accurate. @991gt3mike raised concerns about the maintenance records, questioning the lack of documentation for oil changes and other services, which could deter potential buyers. @Parts619 noted a concern about a possible hole in the soft top and the visibility of a yellow stain, indicating skepticism about the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Irv Gordon notes that with only 1700 miles in 14 years, the vehicle is an excellent choice for anyone looking to buy, drive, and enjoy a great car. @JLsKA510 expresses admiration for the car's unique color, mentioning that beautiful blue P1800s are rare. @Mordizzle describes the listing as a 'Saintly offering', suggesting high regard for the vehicle's quality. @heartt44 appreciates the Massachusetts connection and is considering bidding on the car, while @Mordizzle and @GibsonGirl71 discuss the historical significance of mileage badges and the vehicle's pedigree, contributing positively to the discussion about the car's value.
Neutral: @KarlEric introduces himself as a manager of an international Volvo 1800 registry, which emphasizes the importance of preserving information about these vehicles. He inquires if he can use photos of the car and creates additional visibility for it. Several comments focus on the car's registration details, with @paidtowait questioning the body vs. chassis numbers, and @MinutemanMike providing insights on the vehicle identification number (VIN) and its placement. @GibsonGirl71 also comments on the original color of the vehicle being red and mentions a repaint done by a prior owner. Additionally, @groupj raises questions about the vehicle's specifications, such as cylinder compression and air conditioning installation possibilities.
Negative: @groupj expresses concern about what might not be functioning properly on the vehicle and how extensive the restoration project might be, indicating a potential issue with the car's condition. Another inquiry from @groupj asks if there are cylinder compression readings available, suggesting apprehension regarding the vehicle's performance. @LegalBill regrets missing the opportunity to see the vehicle in person, hinting at potential dissatisfaction among interested buyers who may feel they lost their chance due to timing.
|
 |
Positive: @bfischer12 (The Seller) presents the vehicle enthusiastically, highlighting it as a great example of the final model year L320. They express a personal connection to the vehicle, sharing that they've enjoyed driving it and would keep it if not for space constraints. Additionally, the seller assures potential buyers that recent maintenance work has been completed, indicating that the vehicle is ready for its next owner.
Neutral: Throughout the auction, @bfischer12 (The Seller) responds to several inquiries from potential buyers. @jeffdwax asks about the timing chain and is reassured that, while it hasn't been replaced, the vehicle runs well and is expected to be reliable. @EricRow inquires about the tire date codes and receives confirmation that all tires are from 2022. The seller also addresses concerns about a small chip in the windshield and a scuff on one of the tires by providing photos and reassuring details.
Negative: However, some comments indicate concerns about the condition of the vehicle. @dponn requests more information and photos regarding a chip in the windshield, and @Nhskibm points out a potential issue with a tire that appears to have a surface scuff. These comments suggest that while the seller is providing information, there are still perceived imperfections that might worry potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @asilver33 commented on the vehicle, describing it as a really nice and well-preserved example, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. Additionally, @Just_me shared a positive experience regarding the car, recalling how someone used it as a track car, loading it with tools and tires, which made it seem like a great vehicle overall.
Neutral: @jwcunningham65 expressed curiosity about the discoloration on the dash, asking if it was simply due to the aging of the materials. @pgmasini (The Seller) responded that the discoloration is likely from age but noted that the material and texture are intact, only showing a slight brownish tint that is subtle yet noticeable. @pgmasini also mentioned that they would post more pictures of the underside when a question arose about it and will share a video requested by @QPI of a cold start and driving.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express enthusiasm about the Honda Gorilla, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and nostalgic value. @TheOldGarage1Cali describes the bike as a 'really nice looking' machine that could easily complement someone's collection. @Spider_Mike adds a lighthearted touch with a pun and emphasizes that the bike is a fun little machine, while others reminisce about their fond memories associated with the Honda Z50 Monkey bike, suggesting a strong emotional connection to similar vehicles. @TheVintageCarGuy even pens a playful poem celebrating the bike's charm, contributing to the positive sentiment.
Neutral: The information shared by @TheOldGarage1Cali indicates that the bike has undergone modifications, specifically overboring the engine from 50cc to 80cc, which @dvr.cfp inquires about. @troffer asks for clarification on whether any other restorations have been made to the bike, to which @TheOldGarage1Cali replies that the big bore is the sole modification. These comments illustrate a straightforward exchange of technical details about the bike's specifications and restorations without strong emotional overtones.
Negative: There are few negative comments in this exchange; rather, the tone remains friendly and inquisitive. @troffer's query about further restorations might imply some concern about the bike's overall condition, indicating that potential buyers could be cautious. However, the lack of strong negative feedback suggests that the general sentiment leans towards curiosity rather than outright criticism, with participants primarily focusing on gathering information rather than expressing dissatisfaction.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle’s presentation and aesthetic appeal. @Usd97 praised the 'insane photography,' reflecting the overall excitement around the car's visual showcase. @Vw.dodge added praise, stating, 'this is beautiful' and highlighting the high quality of the photos. @Wob (The Seller) also noted the low mileage and pleasant driving experience of the Boxster, stating it's easy to drive in all conditions and complimenting the classic black color combination, enhancing its timeless appeal.
Neutral: There were various inquiries about the vehicle's condition and details, indicating a mix of curiosity and need for clarification among potential buyers. Commenters like @Spokayman and @vanye777 posed questions about important details such as tire date codes and oil change history. @Tw9886 specifically sought information regarding the door panel warp, which indicates there are some concerns about the car's overall condition despite its visual appeal.
Negative: Some critical comments emerged around the completeness and clarity of the vehicle's photo documentation. @Spokayman remarked that while the photos are beautiful, they lack crucial detail shots, which makes it difficult to assess potential issues such as door panel waviness or interior wear points. Similarly, @kpark10 inquired about the door card condition and noted dissatisfaction with the response given, suggesting that the provided visuals were inadequate to address his concerns. @Spokayman further questioned the accuracy of the tire age based on the Carfax information, raising doubts about the reliability of the car's maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: @TheDirtyThirty praised the car's interior color as "GREY GREEN FTW" and regarded it as unparalleled. @Bomar expressed excitement, stating that it is a stunner and particularly admired the Fiske wheels. @casejam echoed this sentiment, calling the car perfect and referencing their favorite Fikse wheels while humorously suggesting a trade for their Supra TT. @jpearce described the vehicle as "absolutely beautiful" and requested more body pictures, further highlighting the car's appeal. @pdxjohn65 complimented the current state of the paint and body, showing appreciation for @Lehozone's transparency regarding the car's history.
Neutral: @Lehozone (The Seller) clarified the history of the vehicle's accident, stating that it was a minor collision 25 years ago, with no photos available. They reassured potential buyers that the car has been well-maintained and has had no significant issues since the incident. They also explained the restoration process, emphasizing that it involved stripping the vehicle down to bare metal and repainting it but did not include replacing the rear quarter panels. @pdxjohn65 acknowledged @Lehozone's responses as transparent, although they expressed a desire for clearer explanations regarding specific aspects pointing to the recent bodywork.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the history and condition of the vehicle. @Jamespensado007 sought information on the nature of the accident and requested pictures before repairs. @pdxjohn65 and @Cosmo007 both inquired about specific areas pointed out in photos, indicating uncertainty about post-accident work. @sethpat criticized the lack of driving videos, implying that they were inadequate and suggesting a disconnect in showcasing the car's performance. @Capthorod1 made a note on the need for ongoing investment in such vehicles, underscoring that repairs do not need to be frequent like with certain luxury brands, possibly casting doubt on the perceived maintenance of the car.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its classic charm and potential. @Erioc described it as a "nice '57 Bird" and encouraged the seller with wishes of good luck after noting that some minor work could enhance the car. @birddoc also praised its appearance but mentioned the need for some cleaning and detailing, stating it could be a great driver after these adjustments. @gocorcoran chimed in to mention the snaps on the windshield molding suggest a previous owner had a convertible top, yet he was optimistic about the new owner’s options for customization.
Neutral: Comments included inquiries about specific features and details regarding the vehicle's condition. @AimHighToday asked whether all the gauges worked properly, including the clock, and when the car was last serviced. Other commenters, such as @CulpFiction (The Seller), provided useful information regarding the presence of a tonneau cover and the hood, clarifying that the tachometer and speedometer were operational while other gauges were still being assessed. The discussions mentioned the convertible nature of the car, with @joshtattooer commenting on the body code that indicates it's a convertible, thus stirring conversation on its specifications.
Negative: Some comments pointed out concerns and potential issues with the car that may deter prospective buyers. @ddama1 noted a substantial amount of oil and grease visible in the images, raising questions about leakage and maintenance. @Harrah1 speculated about a repair made to the radiator tank and inquired about potential coolant leaks. Furthermore, @gocorcoran addressed the condition of the undercarriage, suggesting that significant detailing work would be needed to restore the car to show quality. These comments collectively indicate that while the car has appeal, it also requires considerable upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: @WAGONBOYTD noted that this vehicle has a connection to the Kalimantan Camel Trophy and praised its authenticity, indicating that many collectors would be interested in such a piece. @DefenderofDefenders expressed confidence in the vehicle's authenticity, stating it has been well cared for by the current owners. @HedrickHSS also appreciated the vehicle's design and questioned why certain details, such as the Camel Trophy decals, weren't included, which would enhance its overall presentation.
Neutral: @Chattanooga inquired about the vehicle's numbers and existence, showing curiosity about its specifications. @slomalley (The Seller) provided detailed responses about the title, specifications, and additional equipment available with the vehicle. @Granny asked specific questions about the vehicle's limited slip differentials and received clarifications, indicating an interest in the technical aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: @GBRBiLL raised concerns about the expected performance metrics, detailing that if the vehicle wasn't able to exceed 60 MPH, it might indicate issues with the engine or gear ratios. @porkpiehat mentioned potential concerns regarding ride comfort at high speeds. @HedrickHSS criticized the absence of Camel Trophy details on the advertising and suggested that the current plates were not fitting for the vehicle's character.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received favorable comments regarding its overall condition, specifically noted by @Gottrucks (The Seller) who assured potential buyers there are no bad smells or evidence of smoke in the vehicle. This reassurance was welcomed by @CarGirl5454, who asked about any unpleasant odors. Additionally, @Gottrucks confirmed the vehicle comes with two keys, which is often seen as a positive aspect in the resale market, enhancing its appeal.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about specific features and maintenance history of the vehicle, indicating potential buyers are actively engaged and seeking more information. @Jbl67 asked about the condition of the brakes and if there were service records available, while @hpark006 inquired about the reason for the radiator replacement. These questions reflect a neutral stance as they are clarifying aspects of the vehicle without expressing positive or negative sentiments.
Negative: There were some uncertainties that surfaced regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, particularly from @hpark006 who questioned the reason behind the radiator replacement. @Jbl67 also expressed concern about the availability of service records. @Gottrucks' responses suggest a lack of detailed history, which might deter some buyers who prefer comprehensive records to ascertain the vehicle's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @BarryLyndon expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, predicting it will sell for a significant amount and notes that the 2016 models could potentially have CarPlay added, showcasing an OEM solution. @StephenBell appreciates the interior's condition, describing it as mint, while @BrAIv admires the vehicle overall, highlighting its low mileage compared to their own car. @SMjaded shares a fondness for suede steering wheels, connecting with the vehicle's luxury appeal. @skonker reminisces positively about their experience with a similar model, expressing a desire to return to their previous car due to its character and aesthetic.
Neutral: @jfuda38454 requests more information regarding an instrument cluster repair, indicating curiosity regarding the circumstances surrounding the issue. @RudeBoy3 asks about the status of a heated steering wheel, which signals interest in specific features of the vehicle. @Alaska-60 inquires about the window sticker, showing interest in the car's original documentation. Furthermore, @Aldinz (The Seller) responds to inquiries, providing clear details about the instrument cluster repair and previous ownership, which adds a layer of transparency to the listing.
Negative: @onehussler raises a concern about the tires, suggesting they may be aged out and experiencing deterioration, prompting a recommendation for verifying the date codes. @RudeBoy3's inquiry about the heated steering wheel leads to @Aldinz (The Seller) confirming its absence, which may disappoint some potential buyers. Generally, concerns about the vehicle's components and features are present, with a few commenters highlighting issues that they believe could affect the car's overall desirability.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments expressed appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and condition. @blackharp called it a 'Cool car,' while @Ccole22 praised the 'Nice Targa' and specifically highlighted the appealing color combination. @Segura911 echoed similar sentiments, calling it a 'very nice car', and @Check_61 found it 'Lovely all around.' In addition, @GatorDMD complimented the beauty of the color, wishing luck to the auction participants. The seller, @KARPARK, also acknowledged the positive feedback and explained enhancements made to the car, stating it has been meticulously maintained and offers a captivating driving experience with its classic design and modern touches.
Neutral: The seller, @KARPARK, provided detailed information regarding the vehicle's condition and history, including extensive records dating back to the early 1990s. They mentioned that while there was a minor touch-up on the passenger-side fender, the Carfax showed no major accidents, ensuring transparency. Comments about the original paint and upgrades were addressed by the seller, who offered to provide paint meter readings and clarified the state of the Targa top and seals, which had been replaced recently. The seller confirmed the car's emissions compliance would be taken care of for the new owner, reinforcing their commitment to support potential buyers.
Negative: Not all comments were unqualified praise; some individuals pointed out areas of concern. @nodriveraids suggested replacing the DOT front lights with H4 lamps, citing both aesthetics and performance, indicating a preference for more suitable options for the car's vintage nature. @jaredj77 raised questions about the Targa top's fit and potential water intrusion, seeking assurance that it provided adequate sealing. Additionally, @mhosny inquired about the longevity of the 'Porsche' decal, suggesting that the vehicle might require careful consideration regarding the removal process. Concerns like these reflect potential buyers' caution, despite the overall enthusiasm and interest in the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered positive remarks regarding its aesthetic, particularly its tan on tan color scheme, which was highlighted by @Tobyallen as 'very up to date' and a significant improvement over earlier clunky designs of the C3 Corvette. @Mike_Breinin reminisced about their own experiences with Corvettes, emphasizing that performance enhancements could really wake up the engine, especially given the nostalgia attached to the '77 model. Other commenters like @CarFoolLane and @maxtorq noted desirable features like the L-82 engine and the 4-speed manual transmission, adding that the car is ready for long drives, indicating it has been well maintained.
Neutral: The seller, @thomasrdoll, has been responsive to inquiries, providing detailed answers regarding the vehicle's condition and history. He clarified that all electrical components work aside from the clock and mentioned that the air conditioning might need a recharge after limited use. He also provided updates on previous maintenance, such as oil changes and differential fluid changes, while discussing the absence of service records from prior repairs. Additionally, he took note of potential alignment or suspension issues raised by @Mike6613 and @sherako, promising to investigate the discrepancies in wheel heights further.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the car's suspension and potential alignment issues, particularly noted by @Mike6613 and @sherako, who discussed observations of uneven heights between the tires. There was also mention of a possible issue with the second gear, suspected to be related to linkage, as indicated by @daximoose. While the car was noted to track straight and not rub while turning, the visual discrepancies and mechanical concerns have left some commenters worried about its overall condition. Further, @74mgb inquired about the operation of all gauges and components, demonstrating hesitation consistent with a lack of comprehensive service history.
|
 |
Positive: @SilverShadow expresses a strong affection for the vehicle, stating that his EXT is his all-time favorite due to its comfort, style, and functionality. He appreciates the GMT800 platform's reliability and is even planning to buy another if his current one fails. @ArtistFox also remarks on the striking condition of the truck, indicating disappointment over Cadillac not continuing the EXT model, while @SOSLLC1 praises it as a beautiful first generation Escalade EXT that stands out from others typically seen with poor modifications and high mileage.
Neutral: @GotronFerret inquires about maintenance records and acknowledges having seen the Carfax report showing service history while also noting a gap in records, expressing a desire for more physical documentation. @johnnyvett shares a preference for the second generation of the vehicle but still recognizes this example as a very nice one. @dantebat points out the absence of a sunroof, which is unusual for an Escalade, while @Captain_Cruz_Control humorously suggests that owning this truck could compensate for personal aspirations not fulfilled.
Negative: @GotronFerret expresses concern regarding the lack of detailed maintenance records, citing a significant gap in service history even with existing Carfax documentation. @misterautomobile criticizes the tires on the truck as being of poor quality compared to the vehicle's overall beauty. There seems to be a general apprehension about maintenance transparency, highlighting a need for comprehensive service documentation to instill buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @ccam8252 mentioned that it is a "Very NICE Truck," showing interest in seeing it up close. @dhonthehill described it as a "sharp looking F250," reinforcing its attractive appearance. @PetesPonies also shared appreciation for the truck's aesthetics, calling it 'beautiful.' Additionally, @BaerBronco complimented the vehicle for its cleanliness and great interior and engine bay. The seller, @kmcypress, expressed gratitude for the positive comments and emphasized that the truck has been well cared for, inviting potential buyers to check it out in person.
Neutral: @Idaho-Joe suggested that flights to check out the truck could be affordable, hinting at the possibility of long-distance interest. @BigWalt007 inquired about arranging a local showing, which indicates a genuine interest in inspecting the vehicle firsthand. The seller responded positively to these inquiries, clarifying the process for local buyers to see the truck. Furthermore, @kmcypress discussed the truck's features, mentioning the existing wiring for a heater or AC as a potential selling point for buyers looking to make upgrades.
Negative: However, not all comments were devoid of criticism. @tdatk pointed out several minor issues with the truck, such as door trim and dual exhaust placement, indicating that these imperfections could detract from the overall appeal. @WIZZZZ raised concerns regarding the non-functional horn and heater, as well as leaks from the motor, transmission, and rear differential. The seller addressed these concerns by explaining the current state of the vehicle's features and clarifying that some issues stem from minimal use over recent months. Overall, while some commenters highlighted the truck's beauty and craftsmanship, others expressed concerns about its functional aspects.
|
 |
Positive: @Spokayman praises the vehicle as a classic ride, highlighting its smoothness and enjoyable cruising experience. They also note that there has been effort to repair various issues over the last couple of years, suggesting that the owner cares for the vehicle. @Robertchiu (The Seller) confirms that the car is in excellent shape after a thorough 210-point diagnostic, mentioning that any needed repairs have been made and that recent rust treatments have been conducted, ensuring its longevity.
Neutral: @Hafttrageh asks to see the soft top, expressing interest in its condition before deciding on the purchase. @19Willys46 requests pictures of the vehicle without the top, indicating a desire to see more aspects of the car before the auction ends.
Negative: @Spokayman raises a concern about the air conditioning system, questioning the need for a recharge less than a year after it was reportedly repaired. @bowtieshu inquires whether the timing chain has been upgraded, which suggests uncertainty about the vehicle's performance. @FatKat provides context about timing chains, indicating that the model year may affect its mechanics.
|
 |
Positive: @Bohi546 praised the vehicle for its spectacular restoration, calling it potentially the nicest Thing he has ever seen. @CarlMHunt also expressed admiration, stating that this Thing is exactly how he remembers his from the late 70s, highlighting the impressive restoration. @jackbarr (The Seller) mentioned their enjoyment in restoring the vehicle to great condition for the next owner.
Neutral: @Oliver427H noted that the vehicle is a '74 model and pointed out specific details regarding the gas heater and missing heater boxes. @ccmasrc reminisced about owning a 74 model that had a gas heater, indicating that rarities exist even within that model year. @CraigInPA raised questions about the missing elements on the dashboard and their functions, while @Dbcooper1951 inquired about the smooth shifting of the transmission, prompting @jackbarr (The Seller) to confirm that the transmission operates smoothly.
Negative: @BZNMT443 raised a concern about the lack of rear seat belts in the vehicle, requesting confirmation. @jackbarr (The Seller) acknowledged the absence of both rear seat belts and the gas heater, which detracted from some buyers' expectations. Additionally, the need for certain components, such as the heater boxes and dashboard items, prompted questions from potential buyers regarding the completeness and functionality of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @aSingh39 (The Seller) welcomes everyone to the auction of a beautiful ML350 and encourages questions through comments or the contact seller option. The seller expresses gratitude for participation in the auction and wishes good luck to the bidders.
Neutral: @aSingh39 (The Seller) informs @capnbob959 that the ML350 is a non-smoker car with no unusual odors. The seller also provides responses to inquiries about the undercarriage, confirming no rust is present, and clarifies that the vehicle lacks features like Blind Spot Assist, an AEB system, and Distronic or Park Assist, as asked by other commenters.
Negative: @rmxtgh expresses confusion over the bidding behavior, feeling that bids ranging from 3500 to the high 8’s to 9k are too high, indicating a lack of understanding of the auction's dynamics. @SMjaded responds to @rmxtgh by suggesting that some bidders may be trying to eliminate those not genuinely interested in the auction.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally appreciate the overall condition and capability of the vehicle. @Dogslovetrucks highlighted the great appearance of the truck, mentioning their own attachment to a similar model. @jedi_apprentice expressed love for their own vehicle and noted that the one for sale seems cleaner. @Mack_the_Knife shared their positive experience owning a similar model for nearly a decade, emphasizing its ease of maintenance and accessibility of parts. Additionally, @justin.pabis vouched for the seller's reputation, asserting that the seller maintains their military vehicles well and ensures they are ready for adventure. The vehicle's features, such as its solid state electronic ignition and newly installed parts, were praised by @AuthenticAuctions (The Seller).
Neutral: Several commenters asked for more specific details about the vehicle, such as the original carburetors included with the sale and registration status. @customscooters inquired whether the original carburetors were part of the sale, while @vetsin questioned the vehicle's title and registration before noting, in edit, that it is indeed titled. @Heiduschke requested videos of the vehicle, and @jflatow wanted to know if the heater is functional. The seller provided clarifications regarding questions on various vehicle aspects, including the condition of the soft top and the number of seatbelts available.
Negative: There were a few concerns raised regarding the truck. @GreyGrendel questioned the condition of the top and whether all rear benches functioned properly, noting that one looked askew in the photos. @Captaingordon pointed out that the wood trim around the truck bed was missing, although they acknowledged it could be easily replaced. Additionally, concerns about the vehicle's condition were mentioned, with @AuthenticAuctions (The Seller) addressing comments on the vehicle being rust-free despite previous conflicting notes about rust on the driveline.
|
 |
Positive: @Calamari_Jujutsu describes the vehicle as 'the million mile truck,' praising its incredible machinery and wishing 'Good Luck With The Auction.' @SupraFreak shares similar sentiments, highlighting the truck's exceptional cleanliness and durability, stating that he drove a similar model for 14 years with minimal repairs. He regards it as the best full-size pickup on the market for years and finds much to love about this well-maintained example, which he mentions is offered at no reserve. @iamalesso (The Seller) expresses gratitude towards bidders and comments, inviting inquiries and encouraging confidence in bidding, while asserting the truck's accident-free history and clean reports with no rust.
Neutral: @iamalesso (The Seller) addresses questions about the vehicle, assuring that it has not been repainted and that all panels are original. He elaborates on the layers of paint designed to protect against road debris, which could lead to confusion about the perceived overspray. @TangoDelta1 provides helpful dimensions of the truck's bed for additional clarity. @lowerfredrick inquires about the availability of a manual transmission option for this model, and @StoopKid responds about the lack of a manual option for this generation.
Negative: @Mercuryman expresses disappointment over a BAT member not honoring their bid commitment, hoping the truck performs better in a second auction attempt. @Bhaskins has concerns about the potential blue overspray on the fuel tank skid plate, questioning if the bedside has been repainted and seeking verification from the seller. While @iamalesso (The Seller) reassures that the truck is untouched, @JBMO also notes perceived color discrepancies in the images, showcasing that some potential buyers have doubts about the paint condition and overall authenticity of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @GeminiKoi (The Seller) highlights the quality and performance of the 66 GMC pickup, describing it as a solid and nicely presenting truck after significant restoration work. The upgrades, including an EFI system and a powerful 350 engine, enable reliable starting and impressive acceleration. The seller shares positive experiences related to the truck's air conditioning, noting it performs exceptionally well in high temperatures, outclassing even a modern family vehicle. Commentors like @JLsKA510 and @RazorbackRed express admiration for the truck's aesthetic and performance features, showcasing a shared enthusiasm for classic GMCs.
Neutral: The truck underwent extensive modifications during the restoration process, which included a switch to a Chevy grille, tailgate, and badging, raising questions about the reasoning behind these choices among interested buyers. @RazorbackRed points out the difference in suspension components between GMC and Chevy models and seeks more information about the truck's longer trips. Additionally, @morrisminiman inquires about the truck's frame length and bed dimensions, indicating an interest in the mechanical specifics of the vehicle, while @GeminiKoi provides clarifications regarding the wheelbase and bed size.
Negative: While the seller praises the truck, he mentions some flaws, including non-functional oil pressure and fuel gauges, a small rust spot, and some superficial dents and scratches on the body. There is also a suggestion for improvement regarding the dullness of the paint on the hood, which may require polishing. @GeminiKoi acknowledges the creaky suspension, with limited components replaced during the refurbishment, leading to some concerns among potential buyers about the truck's overall condition and the quality of its restoration.
|
 |
Positive: @feelthepower mentioned the vehicle's beauty, indicating a positive aesthetic appeal. @Joefromcincinnati, the seller, provided reassurance that the car has been well-maintained by Enthusiast Auto Group (EAG) every 5,000 miles, and shared a video of a cold start, attempting to build confidence among potential buyers. @VetteZ06NJ and @JSinNOLA expressed serious interest in bidding, reflecting a positive perception of the vehicle's value.
Neutral: Several commenters are seeking more detailed information regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and service records, which the seller admits are difficult to provide due to server issues at EAG. @mfmfm inquired about the possibility of obtaining a cold start video and driving footage, while @JuniorDynamicist asked for insights into the maintenance performed by EAG. The conversation reflects a neutral stance as bidders express interest but seek validation through documentation and additional proof of the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Comments from @S65GM and @tonycstech raise concerns about the thoroughness of the checks performed on the rod bearings, questioning how they could be adequately assessed without opening the engine. @RMcN pointed out a safety recall that may not have been addressed, casting further doubt on the vehicle's condition. @mfmfm's repeated inquiries about the oil sample and maintenance history suggest a growing skepticism regarding the seller's transparency and the vehicle's overall reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @Jmont expressed satisfaction after purchasing a 2003 Z4 2.5i from @1600veloce, noting that the car runs beautifully with minimal maintenance since the purchase. They praised @1600veloce as a reputable business owner, encouraging others to bid with confidence. @VTys2k remarked on the uniqueness of the auction, mentioning the desirable Active Sport cloth and leather combination as a cool feature.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the specifications and general condition of the 2006 BMW Z4 being sold. @Gheemer complimented the Titanium Silver color, calling it one of BMW's best colors. They inquired about a potential transmission change observed in the Carfax, and @1600veloce responded by suggesting it might have been a warranty claim. Another user, @JGraham, contributed to the discussion by highlighting their experiences with BMWs and the enjoyment of manual transmissions.
Negative: @Aeneas137 expressed concern regarding a lack of oil change records spanning nearly a decade, questioning the vehicle's maintenance history. This prompted @twobitebrownies to seek further information on any services during that time. @1600veloce replied, indicating that many shops do not report to Carfax and that the vehicle was well-maintained in their facility, addressing the concerns raised. Meanwhile, @NYShopGirl asked about a potential damage issue in the photos, to which @1600veloce clarified that there was no damage present.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received praise for its attractive color combination, as highlighted by @PM3 and @1991325i, who called it a nice E30. @mjaredlee (The Seller) has made notable efforts to ensure the stitching on the seats matches the body color, adding a personalized touch to the interior. Additionally, the seller has addressed concerns about the manual convertible top by adding videos that demonstrate its operation, which has garnered appreciation from @philost for clarifying potential confusion about the top's functionality and for showing the car's driving capabilities.
Neutral: Various comments raised questions regarding the vehicle's specifics, such as @philost's inquiry about the convertible top's operation and @johnbhurr89's concern regarding the engine room, which the seller answered by confirming that the strut bar is easily removable and the car's frame is structurally original. There was also discussion about the significance of the M-Power badge, with @Niedermohr suggesting it may have been added by a previous owner with questionable taste. @mjaredlee (The Seller) noted that the badge is attached with adhesive tape and can be removed, which seemed to satisfy some concerns around its authenticity.
Negative: Concerns have been expressed about potential issues with the vehicle. @Niedermohr queried about the functionality of various systems, including the A/C and the tires' age, suggesting that they might be up to 20 years old. There are apprehensions about the car being roadworthy for extended trips, as @Niedermohr asked if it could handle a real road trip. The seller responded that while everything, including A/C and cruise control, was working, the A/C might need a recharge and there were some unknowns regarding the tire age, which did not alleviate all concerns from potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters like @98WS6 and @BroughtTheTrailer express enthusiasm for the 2000 Chevrolet Camaro Z28, referencing its clean condition and iconic LS1 V8 engine which has a strong reputation. The engaging and humorous descriptions from @BroughtTheTrailer highlight the Camaro's appeal as an 'American muscle legend' with fun features like T-tops and a 6-speed manual transmission, which add to its charm and nostalgic value for fans of classic cars. Overall, there's a strong sense of excitement and positive anticipation surrounding the auction and the car itself.
Neutral: Some comments raise questions regarding the specifications of the vehicle. For instance, @mjcaron notes a discrepancy between the stated wheel sizes, asking for clarification on whether the car has 16" or 17" wheels, while @jays964 points out that the tire pictures suggest it has 17" wheels. Additionally, @98WS6 provides feedback that the car is misidentified as a 1992 model, indicating a mistake in the listing which @BroughtTheTrailer acknowledges as a typo.
Negative: Concerns about the accuracy of the listing have been raised by commenters like @mjcaron and @98WS6, who also imply that the provided specifications may be misleading. @98WS6 specifically highlights that the vehicle is incorrectly referred to as a 1992 model, suggesting that misinformation might be detrimental to potential buyers. These comments may create doubt among interested parties regarding the car's authenticity and the accuracy of the details provided in the auction.
|
 |
Positive: @Sixtyvalve emphasizes the impressive power of the vehicle, particularly noting its substantial MSRP of 135K. @Wheeler25 appreciates the performance aspect, mentioning the added appeal of rear seats and praising the combination of T and 7-speed transmission. Additionally, @bzcat highlights a well-specified T model, mentioning that the interior package with extended leather and green stitching is a worthy investment. Overall, there is a consensus among commenters that the car boasts excellent features and specifications.
Neutral: @Z4ish brings up interesting points about pricing differences, noting that while this model is regarded at around $160K in the U.S., similar 2026 models can be found in Canada for significantly lower prices. @vivek.ze contributes to this discussion by expressing confusion regarding the high valuation, suggesting that a custom-built 2026 model could offer more features for the same price. They also recognize a potential personal preference that could make the previous model (992.1) more appealing to some buyers.
Negative: On the downside, some concerns were raised regarding the car's pricing and how it has escalated, with @back40s (The Seller) acknowledging that various factors, including tariffs and a general increase in market prices for Porsches, may contribute to this situation. @davidcarson48 mentions a technical service bulletin issue regarding lightweight glass, which may require warranty attention. Additionally, the small chip in the driver's side window prompted worry about potential repair complications, though @back40s reassured that it is merely a cosmetic issue.
|
 |
Positive: @CamBam expressed appreciation for the beautiful 300E that @4WHEEL_GERMAN listed, thanking them for providing the opportunity to consider the vehicle. @4WHEEL_GERMAN also received compliments about the condition of the car and the attention it has garnered, demonstrating positive engagement with potential buyers.
Neutral: @4WHEEL_GERMAN provided various details about the car's features and condition, answering key inquiries from interested parties like @CamBam and @scaffie. The seller confirmed the air conditioning blows cold, details the inspection location, and stated that there are no known fluid leaks, presenting the vehicle's maintenance status positively and inviting further questions.
Negative: @cdwatnsu humorously pointed out the repetitiveness of @JonFrancis's inquiries about the electronic fuel injection and wiring harness, indicating some annoyance with recurring themes in the comments. Additionally, @cdwatnsu's comments hinted at concern regarding the vehicle's performance in California's intense sun, implying that the smoke silver color could be challenged under such conditions.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, emphasizing its rarity and historical significance. @RidleysRides referred to it as "WOW! NICE," while @Shoudashell called it a "Rare Bird!" @Acceleratii_Incredibus described it as their "ultimate dream machine," and @Mike_Breinin noted that it is indeed very rare, highlighting only 57 made in 1974. @Treepeddler added a personal touch by suggesting the car could be even better if it were a year older and a four-speed. The enthusiast community recognizes the car as a beautiful example of automotive history, with @ParadiseRoad sharing love for the memories the vehicle evokes, and many others praising the restoration efforts.
Neutral: In the comments, the seller, @jmalara, provided detailed responses about the car's condition, answering questions about its originality, rust damage, and features. They confirmed that the vehicle is a numbers-matching car, with the original engine and transmission, while also mentioning the original AM radio and updates made during restoration. Comments from enthusiasts like @C17aggie inquired about the functionality of the tachometer, which @jmalara affirmed was operational. Various users discussed the vehicle’s specifications and history, noting that while it may need some work, it remains a solid car with a strong following.
Negative: Despite the generally positive feedback, some negative comments highlighted potential issues with the vehicle. @scottknows pointed out glaring omissions in the restoration, like the cracked dashboard and uncharged air conditioning, questioning why these weren't addressed. Similarly, @HemiEddie426 raised concerns about the engine's condition, asking if it had been out of the car recently and how well it runs. Overall, while the car has a lot going for it, there are concerns about its readiness and what maintenance may be needed for a new owner.
|
 |
Positive: Many users have expressed positive sentiments about the stunning Aventurine Green color of this 718 Boxster GTS, highlighting it as a beautiful and unique color that looks spectacular, especially in sunlight. Commenters like @Aknatar and @waffles2 praised the color combo, while @TrainGoob appreciated both the color and the manual transmission. The vehicle's low mileage and no-stories history are also appealing, as noted by @WestsideCCS, the seller. Overall, there's a consensus that this is an attractive car that is sure to turn heads on the road.
Neutral: Some commenters engaged in discussions about the vehicle's features and options, such as the entertainment unit including Apple CarPlay (@PCar17) and the practicality of the GTS versus the Spyder model. Users like @Cyall8r and @preda debated the merits of each model, with both sides acknowledging the strengths of the GTS in usability and value retention. The seller also clarified confusion regarding the paint specification, noting it was listed incorrectly, which stirred some conversation around color classifications and pricing nuances.
Negative: The vehicle has faced some scrutiny over its service history and claims regarding maintenance. Commenters like @CashCowell and @JKB raised concerns about the service records and oil change history, pushing @WestsideCCS to clarify the car's maintenance had been managed proactively despite its low mileage. There was also confusion around the term "Paint To Sample" with some users pointing out inaccuracies in the listing, and @larrib expressed skepticism over the authenticity of the color's classification. Overall, while the car is praised, some detailed matters about service history and paint specification have sparked discussions that suggest potential areas for improvement.
|
 |
Positive: @LoudNotFast praises the vehicle's beauty, showing appreciation for its aesthetics. @BabyD69's comment 'Giddy up' implies excitement and enthusiasm about the vehicle, suggesting it has a dynamic appeal. @Dehnerac reminisces about their own experience with the truck, indicating it had a positive impact on social interactions during high school, which further adds to the appeal of the vehicle.
Neutral: @NorseHorse, the seller, provides a detailed history of the truck, stating it was originally bought by an elderly woman in Colorado Springs and later purchased with very low mileage. The seller also mentions that the truck underwent a rotisserie build, which might attract potential buyers interested in vintage or custom vehicles. Another neutral exchange comes from @Jjpearson inquiring about air conditioning, which the seller confirms the vehicle has, balancing functionality with its vintage charm.
Negative:
|
455-Powered 1935 Chevrolet Master Deluxe 2-Door Town Sedan Street Rod
J3441
Lot 201649
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many comments express a favorable opinion about the vehicle, with @thedocman stating, "I think it looks good just minor things but that’s normal for any car I Love it." Additionally, @racer841 complements the car and wishes @bbeaulieu (The Seller) good luck with the sale. @bbeaulieu (The Seller) also shows enthusiasm and regard for the car, noting it was inherited from his late father, and emphasizes that he wants to see it go to someone who will appreciate and enjoy it. The reassurance that the AC works and that the car has been reliable for long drives adds to the positive sentiment around the vehicle.
Neutral: There are several inquiries and observations made by commenters regarding the specific features and conditions of the car. @racer841 asks about various mechanical aspects including the rear end, gear ratio, and whether the vehicle can be driven long distances. @bbeaulieu (The Seller) acknowledges that some details might be unclear due to the circumstances under which he inherited the car. He commits to provide additional photographs and check specific components like the brake lights and blinkers, displaying a willingness to engage and clarify the car's status for potential buyers.
Negative: However, there are concerns mentioned about the vehicle that reflect negatively. @mike_rockwell initially remarks on the appearance of a broken side mirror, suggesting that it could be a discernible issue. Furthermore, @bbeaulieu (The Seller) highlights an issue with the running lights, noting they are either not functioning or are very dim. There is also a caution from @bbeaulieu (The Seller) about driving the car long distances due to potential leaks from the window weatherstripping, which could pose problems in inclement weather. Overall, these comments indicate some mechanical doubts and minor cosmetic assessments.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments suggest that the 2019 Audi Q5 is a comfortable vehicle and suitable for long drives, with @DjagXJ12 highlighting its ability to handle extended road trips without causing fatigue. Moreover, @packardv8 agrees, mentioning that it's a driver-friendly car that offers great fuel economy at 33 MPG on the highway. The vehicle's attributes like the ventilated seats and premium sound system are appreciated, contributing to its status as a well-rounded car. @Tigers196884 supports the auction platform, noting the competitiveness of bids and the quality of the cars available, reinforcing the overall positive perception of the vehicle in context to its market.
Neutral: The comment section includes various inquiries and requests for clarification about the vehicle's history. @fgnavy88 addresses concerns about the clarity of the tire information, while @70sman queries about the insurance report and the condition of the tires. @Konfidence1 responds to these inquiries with tire details and clarifications on the accident history, attempting to maintain transparency regarding the vehicle's past. Additionally, there are acknowledgments of bids and discussions about the auction dynamics, which provide insight but do not significantly lean positive or negative towards the vehicle's condition or value.
Negative: There are concerns regarding the vehicle's reported accidents and potential issues. @70sman and @fgnavy88 express uncertainty about the accuracy of the Carfax report and previous accidents mentioned in the records, while @packardv8 shares an experience of dealing with water damage from a car wash, indicating a flaw in sealing. Comments about known issues with the infotainment system and other characteristics raise doubts over reliability. Furthermore, @Henderson00 expresses skepticism about the bidding practices, suggesting manipulation, which could detract from the overall confidence in the auction process related to this vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as a delight with a lovely build, complimenting its beige over white color scheme. @milesm22 also appreciates the look of the early Scout and expresses eagerness for driving videos. @trailerjack praises the seller for showcasing the little details of the Scout, while @LPilon22 thanks the seller for providing driving videos that sound solid and match a perfect day for it.
Neutral: @MPTN inquires about the year of the vehicle and what is stated on the title, while @milesm22 clarifies that the title lists it as a 1965, speculating on the possible origins of the doors. @JimAllen contributes by confirming through the serial number that it is a very early 1962 model, providing historical context about window types and the vehicle's production era. @veehjay and @maverickster discuss apparent modifications and issues regarding the vehicle's brake reservoir cover, indicating an interest in the vehicle's condition and updates.
Negative: @rmay1976 (The Seller) receives questions regarding the absence of a back seat and information about the top, with @dbfdbf asking about the availability of pictures with the top on and the presence of lap belts. @ecartaya raises concerns about the windows, expressing a wish for features like removable vent windows and questioning the belt situation, indicating a desire for enhanced safety and functionality. Overall, there are several inquiries that point to potential deficiencies or modifications that some buyers might find concerning.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the 220S as an "absolutely beautiful, rare" vehicle, praising its fabulous sunroof and lovely original interior. Many comments express amazement at its overall great condition, mentioning the wonderful dash, upholstery, and undercarriage. @Luz_do_sol shares enthusiasm for the car, highlighting its appealing features, including the desirable sliding sunroof, and praises its stored condition in a dry climate, suggesting a sympathetic restoration rather than a full overhaul. @UncleFred1 sees the car's solid bones and mechanical workability as positives, encouraging interest from potential buyers.
Neutral: @JFrankP (The Seller) acknowledges the various comments regarding the vehicle's condition, contributing insights about the restoration processes that could be undertaken. Commenters like @whipcity76 and @Frank_Barrett note the potential for a simpler restoration, with @mgdurand suggesting the car might be a manageable project if the fuel system and carbs are addressed. The discussion suggests that while the paint is a concern, the beautiful interior and overall solid condition make the 220S a potentially valuable project vehicle, appealing to both casual and serious buyers alike.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns about the less-than-stellar respray and the potential costs associated with restoring the car, as highlighted by @Frank_Barrett. @bvd believes the interior may not be original, raising questions about authenticity. There are also warnings about the complexities involved in restoring the vehicle, with @raykosh pointing out that many individuals struggle to properly rebuild the carbs unless willing to invest significant time and money. @cloudcar notes discrepancies in the vehicle's mileage, hinting at possible uncertainties around its history.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the car's stunning aesthetic appeal and overall beauty. @PAEnglish11 describes it as a beautiful car, while @GLWA praises its gorgeous presentation. @RCMotor (The Seller) also emphasizes the car's stunning original paint and smooth ride, detailing how it's been sparingly driven and well cared for in a climate-controlled garage, hinting at a rich collector's history. Enthusiastic commenters like @mlowengrub appreciate its classic design and color combination, indicating a strong nostalgic connection and admiration for the car's timeless beauty.
Neutral: There are also neutral observations regarding the vehicle's history and condition, particularly its AC system. @saab81 notes that the current owner had to recharge the AC after adding around 1200 miles, with @RCMotor (The Seller) addressing this by explaining the presence of a potential tiny leak and confirming the AC blows cold air. Other commenters like @motroman stress the importance of detailed photos of the car's underside for potential buyers, while discussions about the car's service history and AC conversion add a technical layer to the conversation.
Negative: On the negative side, there are concerns about the vehicle's AC system. @saab81 questions whether the AC may have complications given the recharge needs, and @RCMotor (The Seller) acknowledges a small leak found at the compressor shaft seal, which is currently being repaired. @motroman requested better photos of various car components, suggesting a need for transparency regarding the vehicle's condition. This indicates that while there are many praises for the car, issues surrounding the AC may deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments expressed admiration for the vehicle's overall condition and value, highlighting it as a beautiful car that represents an excellent option for those seeking a Porsche. @Blizzard340 appreciated the Boxster as the best bang for the buck, suggesting a minor investment to address the IMS bearing if desired. @markindallas noted the seller's good communication and service, which was refreshing for a buyer's experience. Additionally, @collectiveauto (The Seller) provided comprehensive answers to questions about maintenance records and service history, demonstrating transparency and engagement with potential bidders.
Neutral: Commentators raised various questions and observations about specific aspects of the car, particularly regarding the IMS bearing, convertible top condition, and maintenance history. @Upstate101 asked about the state of the brakes and the convertible top's function, while @nkowi inquired about possible overspray seen in the car's photos. @Deu1001 expressed concern over unusual noises in videos, reflecting the thoughtful scrutiny buyers apply to vehicle inspections. These inquiries indicate a balanced interest in both the vehicle's aesthetic and functional integrity.
Negative: Concerns about the car's IMS bearing surfaced repeatedly, with some comments indicating significant anxiety among potential buyers. @Buster020065 highlighted the potential costs involved if the IMS bearing fails, suggesting it is a crucial issue that buyers should consider seriously. Similarly, others noted the problematic nature of the convertible top and its associated costs, with @super9064 mentioning high costs for replacement materials. Overall, there was a evident caution surrounding some common issues associated with the model, emphasizing the need for serious consideration before bidding.
|
 |
Positive: @DaveInTahoe: Beautiful car! This should get all the money. GLWTA! @nexusautobrokers: these are amazing cars interested to see what it brings. We are guessing 180-210K is fair. @56Chevy210: @nexusautobrokers ..... I’d bet high end of your guess. Definitely over 200k. Great example ... GLWTA!!! @Cooper1386: Unicorn!!! @Thetatebaumercollection: WOW!! Didn’t know I could still get a NEW 2007 Turbo 6-speed! So much want! @JerseyDirt: I love to see these low mileage unicorns. It’s great to see that some of these wonderful cars were preserved. @Ryangfriedman (The Seller): Great opportunity here – who knows how many are left untouched like this! Bid with confidence!!!
Neutral: @Ryangfriedman (The Seller): Less than 24 hours left. Any questions please feel free to ask. @Supergrass: Have the coolant lines been pinned? I’m joking. @M_Blitz: @LB1, 'towards' the last of the Mezgers. The last year for the Turbo Mezgers was 2009. @M_Blitz: I can’t believe @Ryanfriedman actually posted the DME report. That report is laughable good/great. @Ytsimura: Unfortunate, maybe it’s me but seeing low mileage vehicles like this is sad. This is a purpose built machine and was not meant to sit for 20 years. Drive your car peeps! We are here for a very limited time :), @Porsche1986: What beautiful car but too many miles!!!!!!
Negative: @RBcar1: Poor car. All it ever wanted was to live the fast life. Ended up as an art piece. @TommyShelby85: Too many miles for me, I’m out. @Ar23jer: Who sits on a car like this!?!? Why!? @Fleche_dOr: Old enough to vote, yet never allowed to venture beyond the neighborhood. @debtsandbooze: Where do you find these?! Still kicking myself for letting Grand Prix take that C2S.
|
 |
Positive: @58GMC shared that the vehicle is an awesome Model A roadster, highlighting its excellent handling and performance during a recent evening cruise with his family. He noted good acceleration, smooth shifting, and impressive braking capabilities, expressing his fondness for the car and how it receives numerous compliments on the road. It's clear that the seller has a lot of pride in this classic vehicle, emphasizing the joy it brings during drives.
Neutral: Commenters like @Guitar1 raised questions about specific features, such as the head stud and the presence of seatbelts in the vehicle, which @58GMC addressed, clarifying that the head stud had been like that for years and the seatbelts were simply tucked under the seat. @r_carrie discussed the engine serial number, noting its uniqueness and considering the vehicle's history, while @feymsupreme inquired about the original VIN and its matching title, to which the seller confirmed that the VIN is stamped on the frame but verification would require removing the body.
Negative: There seems to be some concerns regarding parts availability and historical accuracy, as raised by @tburz and @jsox72. @jsox72 specifically asked about the timeline of the engine rebuild, and @58GMC unfortunately did not have details on that. This lack of specific information regarding previous ownership and modifications may leave some potential buyers uncertain about the vehicle's history.
|
 |
Positive: @DC_MotorWerks (The Seller) highlights the unique St. James red color of the Bentley GT Speed, noting its performance model status and low mileage under 40k. The seller expresses enthusiasm about the car's luxurious interior and extensive service history, suggesting it is a well-maintained vehicle that offers an enjoyable driving experience. @Chuck246 shares a positive personal experience with a similar car, praising its speed, reliability, and comfort, indicating strong satisfaction with his purchase.
Neutral: @Joevant comments simply on the aesthetic appeal of red Bentleys, while @HPLM questions the design choice of wheel color, which @DC_MotorWerks addresses by confirming the presence of factory wheels. @I8A4RE expresses admiration for the vehicle, viewing it as a dream car and mentions proximity to @DC_MotorWerks, showing interest in possibly visiting the seller. @Tervuren raises a question about the vehicle’s front air ride system, which @DC_MotorWerks assures is functioning well with no issues.
Negative: @Red99 raises multiple concerns regarding the vehicle's history and condition, specifically inquiring about water damage, the vehicle's storage location, and the status of the air suspension struts. These questions reflect a level of skepticism about the car that contrasts with the predominantly positive feedback from others, highlighting the need for further clarification on the vehicle's maintenance and past experiences.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the Packard, highlighting its stunning appearance and original features. @Rod-Mary (The Seller) mentioned that they have loved the car for over 60 years and provided assurances about its condition, stating it has no leaks and is all original, which was echoed by @daveo1389 and @Rixx56 who praised the car's color and care. Several users, including @49CaddyFan and @1929JDHog, also noted how well the car has been restored and maintained, with one commenter calling it a "better-than-new 1940 Packard Coupe!"
Neutral: Some comments provided factual information and inquiries without overt positivity or negativity. For instance, @chefdek inquired about the vehicle's voltage system and any potential leaks. @Dairyman also discussed the 6-volt system and reasons for the motor industry's switch to 12-volt systems, reflecting a knowledgeable interest in vintage vehicles. @Packardfrank asked if there had been any head gasket leaks, to which the seller provided context regarding past seepage due to restoration.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns regarding the car's condition. @Rschmidt63 pointed out potential oil leaks, citing specific photos of the car that illustrated oil on various components. @Rschmidt63 expressed concern about the presence of leaks despite appreciating the car's overall appeal. Additionally, @TimTech expressed a preference for a different color option, indicating a subjective critique of the car's aesthetic choices.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its exhilarating driving experience and fun factor. @GCEA (The Seller) describes the 2024 Vanderhall Carmel GTS as an absolute blast to drive, emphasizing that this model offers a fantastic value. With only 200 miles, the seller notes that the car is essentially brand new and turns heads while cruising. @Trifiveron adds that it looks too good and too much fun to sell, indicating high enthusiasm for the vehicle.
Neutral: There were some clarifications about the model details, as @Nahpets questioned if the vehicle was indeed a Carmel GTS due to paddle shifters being standard on that model. @GCEA (The Seller) acknowledged this possibility and agreed to confirm the specifications while ensuring transparency about the model designation. Other auction participants like @Hogcapt and @Mmudlin added their thoughts about the model being a GT or base Carmel, further indicating active engagement in verifying the auction descriptions.
Negative: A few concerns were raised regarding the auction process and additional fees. @arcturus pointed out that the $425 document fee might deter potential bidders, as most dealers do not include such fees. @DeanFrat70 inquired about the lien status of the title, expressing concern about its clarity. Additionally, @FoxRed1 questioned the remaining factory warranty, seeking reassurance regarding the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its incredible preservation and like-new condition, referring to it as a "time capsule." @Tim, the seller, noted that the car, with only 321 miles, was stored properly and maintained meticulously, capturing the interest of potential buyers. Commenters like @LB1 referred to it as a record low mileage find, while @fireside77 and @MPETESS10 reminisced about their personal connections to the Cavalier brand, emphasizing how desirable it is to see such a well-maintained example.
Neutral: Several comments provided factual insights about the vehicle's specifications and features, with @newcarpro listing detailed VIN information and @molzent responding to inquiries regarding the car's condition, such as the functionality of the AC and the presence of factory-installed features. The car's history, including the conversion of the AC system and the inclusion of an additional set of wheels, was discussed openly, leading to various questions from potential buyers.
Negative: While the overall sentiment was positive, some commenters showed a hint of skepticism or disinterest. @BSer admitted that the vehicle was not particularly cool to them, although they appreciated its condition and were glad to see it available for viewing. @981D4 questioned the practical reasoning behind the AC conversion, suggesting it might not have been necessary since the car had been mostly unused. Additionally, comments about the absence of a manual transmission by @Eric_NW and @fstezaws indicated a slight disappointment among certain classic car enthusiasts.
|
 |
Positive: Overall, the comments about the vehicle are quite favorable, with many users praising its aesthetic appeal and solid build quality. @LoudNotFast remarked on it being a "solid rig", while @ttocs6991 complimented its look, stating it has a great stance in person. Additionally, @Shomoil (The Seller) showcased upgrades made to the GX470, which cost over $15,000, including enhancements like a GOBI roof rack and custom bumpers, which seems to impress potential buyers and commenters alike.
Neutral: Several participants sought more specific information and clarifications regarding the GX470's components and features. Questions arose regarding the undercarriage condition, whether third-row seats were available, and requests for various measurements like height and overall dimensions occurred frequently. @Shomoil (The Seller) actively engaged with commenters, providing answers and promising to upload pictures while responding to inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and modifications.
Negative: Some concerns were raised, particularly about the vehicle's upper control arms, with @84FLH pointing out that they appeared to be OEM rather than the advertised Icon Stage 5 components. @Shomoil (The Seller) acknowledged some discrepancies regarding the modifications made to the vehicle, which could potentially affect its perceived value. Additionally, questions about maintenance history, such as whether the transmission fluid was changed, reflect a level of skepticism among potential buyers, as noted by @m3th0d.
|
 |
Positive: @Sessions199 has provided detailed information about the vehicle's history, confirming its low mileage and original ownership, which adds credibility. Several commenters, including @richardlava and @FormerSaabGuy, expressed admiration for the car’s clean condition and noted that it represents a great example of a classic convertible, with @Tigers196884 suggesting it is one of the best remaining C900s. The vehicle has been described as a smooth and fast ride, with @jhutchy26 complimenting its attractive combination of green and tan colors.
Neutral: There were various inquiries directed towards @Sessions199 regarding the vehicle's features and specifications, such as the presence of the tonneau cover and the functionality of the soft top. @BEK_Boston asked for videos demonstrating the car's cold start and top operation, which @Sessions199 promptly provided links to on YouTube, indicating the car has been well-maintained and is operational. Comments in the discussion suggest that while opinions vary, most users seem to appreciate the seller’s engagement and willingness to clarify details about the car's condition and history.
Negative: Some negative feedback was observed, particularly from @Jhutchy26, who questioned the claim that this vehicle is one of the nicest examples, pointing out issues like surface rust and the condition of the top and seats. Additionally, @lewtus expressed a desire for a manual transmission, indicating a preference that may not align with the vehicle's features. This demonstrates a divide in expectations among potential buyers, with some critics feeling that the car may not live up to the hype surrounding it.
|
 |
Positive: @mark_99 describes the vehicle as a 'Beauty' while @AndyF007 rates it 10/10 stating they wouldn't change a thing and having 'no notes.' @boaboyoz enthusiastically praises the Indiana F-100 as an 'incredible' and 'seriously cool' build, wishing good luck with the auction (GLWTA). @TommyBruin also shows approval for the restomod F-100, commending @boaboyoz and making a light-hearted remark about the auction environment bringing out some critics, highlighting the camaraderie among commenters. In terms of functionality, @Rscheeringa (The Seller) confirms that the front and rear glass rubber moldings are in good condition and mentions that the door seals are new. The vehicle is equipped with a powerful 460 engine, producing between 400 to 425 horsepower after modifications, according to the seller. @Rscheeringa also reassures potential buyers by stating that the vehicle starts up easily, runs smoothly, and is enjoyable to drive. On a more critical note, @MakeItGoBrrrrrr points out that the suspension appeared 'mushy' in the driving video, raising concerns about whether the Ridetechs are set to their softest setting, questioning if the bumper might interact with the ground during sharp turns. @viking00 similarly requests cold start and driving videos, suggesting that further insights into the vehicle’s performance could be beneficial for potential buyers.
Neutral: @Rscheeringa (The Seller) provides insights about the door seals and the performance specifications of the vehicle, mentioning that the engine has a mild cam, headers, and a high-rise intake. They indicate that while the modifications are not radical, they still improve the vehicle's performance sufficiently.
Negative: There are minor concerns raised regarding the vehicle's suspension performance. @MakeItGoBrrrrrr notes that the suspension looked pretty mushy during a driving video, questioning whether it may be set too soft. @viking00 also inquires about cold start and driving videos, indicating that more evidence of the vehicle's capabilities could help alleviate concerns.
|
 |
Positive: @Ricojr10 (The Seller) remarked that this vehicle was well taken care of and garage kept by their late father, showcasing its history of care. @WestfaliaBob noted that it is a very handsome Rolls, indicating appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic appeal. @Undatakr complimented the good condition of the Everflex top, emphasizing an aspect of the car that may be seen as a positive feature, while wishing 'Good luck with the auction!'
Neutral: Several comments provided insights into the model specifics of the vehicle. @kostasd pointed out that it is a long wheelbase version of the Silver Shadow. @PMC1924 confirmed this by stating that it is a LWB Silver Shadow, with accurate details about the model year. @Mark_in_TO indicated flexibility regarding model year designations, aligning the chassis number with a 1976 model year, which provides clarity on its production timeline.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, there were significant concerns raised about the vehicle's condition. @JBAdams commented on the costly repairs needed to restore the car, suggesting it will require specialist attention, highlighting the severity of the damage. @PrometheanHeat noted what appeared to be fire damage in the ignition key box, raising alarms about potential hazards. This sentiment of apprehension regarding the car's restoration was further emphasized by the acknowledgment of potentially high repair costs estimated between $5-10k.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the Jeep Cherokee Chief as a beautiful and exceptionally clean vehicle, particularly appreciating its Copper Brown Metallic exterior and the stylish Nutmeg vinyl interior. @YouAintLowTrucks and @axelrider express admiration for the truck, with @YouAintLowTrucks referring to it simply as a "Beautiful Truck!" and @axelrider noting his wife's interest in a similar model. @Buckinjeep also emphasizes the rarity of this Jeep model, expressing enthusiasm for its striking color and design, noting that it stands out compared to traditional factory finishes.
Neutral: Several comments center around practical inquiries and clarifications regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @kingfish1108 asks about tire clearance and any potential scuffing, while @DonFrmCA requests more information regarding the vehicle's engine history and restoration details. @smashville4 raises questions about the odometer reading and the vehicle's mileage history, requesting clarity on whether a potential odometer rollover has affected the current valuation of the Jeep.
Negative: There are concerns expressed about the transparency of the vehicle's history and the lack of documentation. @eeul111 and @smashville4 voice apprehensions regarding the discrepancies in the odometer reading as well as the vehicle's resale history, questioning the value and the seller's claims. @Traveler66 offers a cautionary note about the investment potential of the vehicle, indicating that while it's a nice truck, it may not serve well as a financial investment.
|
 |
Positive: @GruberMotors highlights the Signature Green Roadster as a rare and striking vehicle, emphasizing its unique color and the meticulous work done to restore and upgrade its features. @Factoid notes that after inspecting the car, it appears practically brand new, potentially in better condition than when it was initially delivered, suggesting high confidence in the vehicle's quality and the satisfaction of future buyers. @DarkPsych describes the Roadster as beautiful, expressing enthusiasm for the listing and wishing the seller luck.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the car's condition and features without strong positive or negative sentiment. @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 evokes nostalgia about the car's historical context and its display in the early Tesla Service Center, while @sweetleon brings up the importance of the battery pack's evaluation, prompting the seller for an update on its current condition. Questions from @Thomas1369 and @DeanBob regarding the signature plaque and the history of the vehicle's paint work serve to clarify details for potential buyers.
Negative: There are concerns regarding the car's history and any potential issues raised by @DeanBob, who inquires if there has been any paint work done and asks for a description of "paint correction." The uncertainty implied in his questions suggests hesitation about the vehicle's exterior condition or maintenance history. @sweetleon's request for a CAC update also indicates a need for reassurance about the vehicle's battery performance, hinting at potential anxieties about long-term battery health.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors expressed excitement and appreciation for the vehicle's premium features. @dphillips noted that the A/C blows cold and both the heated and ventilated seat functions operate correctly. @AlGreenman complemented the car's extensive service history, which shows consistent maintenance and care from new until present. The seller (@aegmotorsports) highlighted the car's luxurious aspects, like the Harman Kardon sound system, heated seats, and various advanced safety features, creating a positive impression of the overall quality and upkeep of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commentors sought additional details about the vehicle's condition and service history. @Shabeeh inquired about the reported minor damage, which @aegmotorsports clarified as cosmetic, addressing concerns about any potential impact on the vehicle's integrity. The seller's quick and comprehensive responses about the car’s history and specifications provide potential buyers with necessary information without swaying their opinions toward a positive or negative stance.
Negative: There were concerns raised regarding certain physical aspects of the vehicle, particularly about a bulge near the front door windows, as mentioned by @SBO1. This comment indicates a potential issue or aesthetic concern that may deter some buyers. Although @aegmotorsports assured that all systems function properly and that the reported damage was minor, the mention of any irregularities may lead to skepticism about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle showcase admiration for its design and modifications. @tim54575 (The Seller) emphasizes the excellent condition of the bike's tank, stating it has never seen ethanol, which maintains its original specifications. @TangerineDream expresses love for the customization, recalling ownership of a similar bike, and mentions that someone will be lucky to own it. @slowboat praises the bike's MIVV exhaust for delivering a distinct Ducati sound, while @ShneebWorks describes it as a beauty, highlighting the appeal of the bike's aesthetic and performance enhancements.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in inquiries about the motorcycle's condition and service history. @justpaul inquires about the tank replacement due to ethanol, demonstrating interest in the bike's maintenance. @philinnc asks about the rear turn signals, indicating they are a functional detail of the bike. @Jmazny raises questions about the low mileage since 2018, and the servicing of forks and brakes, acknowledging the seller's expertise in bike building. @ebranman comments on the high shipping cost to California, which might dissuade interested buyers, although @tim54575 suggests the price may be negotiable.
Negative: There are mixed feelings regarding the lack of service documentation. @ratfnk1 asks for receipts to confirm maintenance history, specifically for the timing belt replacement and valve adjustment, which might concern potential buyers about the bike's upkeep. @ebranman expresses disappointment about the steep shipping costs, indicating that it might discourage prospective buyers. Overall, while the comments reflect a generally positive reception of the bike, the lack of service documentation and the shipping costs raise some valid concerns among potential buyers.
|
Ram Jet 383-Powered 1968 Chevrolet Camaro Convertible 6-Speed
124678N434969
Lot 201691
Private Party
 |
Positive: @McDeeb (The Seller) highlights how the 1968 Camaro Convertible is a beautiful build that performs exceptionally well, stating it fires right up with an intoxicating exhaust and impressive throttle response. The six-speed shifter is easy to operate, making it user-friendly for those learning to drive manual. The driving experience is enjoyable with excellent fit and finish, and the suspension and braking are well-designed, allowing for great control and ride quality. Overall, the vehicle provides turn key enjoyment with admirable performance, making it a desirable option for buyers.
Neutral: Commenters like @Flipperoriginal and @Carbine123 appreciate the Camaro's aesthetics, calling it a very nice-looking vehicle and a stellar seller, respectively. Other users, such as @Timsar, express curiosity about the wheels, suggesting alternatives that could enhance the car's look further. A few concerns are raised regarding specifics, such as the tachometer's origin, the radiator and cooling setup, and questions about the details of the paint and overall condition, showing interest in understanding both the vehicle's strengths and any potential shortcomings.
Negative: There are a few criticisms regarding the car, primarily focused on the paint and potential modifications. @Jack15 feels that the wagon wheels do not match the car's great presentation, while @tombryan333 points out concerns about possible rust and peeling clear coat on carbon fiber components. Questions from users like @cjobrien highlight areas of overspray on the leaf springs and query the effectiveness of the air conditioning, which is currently inoperable. There is also skepticism about overall wear and quality based on the visual inspection of provided photographs.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is recognized as a significant model in the sports car segment from 1986, with @Calstickshift highlighting its status as a standard bearer for aspirational sports cars during that era. Several commenters noted appealing features, such as an extended hub steering wheel, which @944play mentions as highly desirable. The seller (@Cahensley) has been responsive and accommodating, addressing inquiries about the car's mileage and condition, and providing additional photos to clarify any concerns.
Neutral: There have been requests for clarification regarding the vehicle's ownership history, as noted by @Dantanna72, who pointed out discrepancies regarding when the current owner acquired the car versus the title transfer date. Commenters have also asked for proof of the current mileage displayed on the car, as there seems to be confusion over the condition of the gauge cluster, with @Spokayman referencing the seller's write-up and the fact that the cluster was replaced under the current ownership.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about various aspects of the vehicle, particularly its interior condition. @Dantanna72 pointed out several blemishes on the seats and dashboard, prompting questions about potential damages. Additionally, @bamaNator inquired about a possible issue with the right-side fog light, suggesting it might be burned out or indicative of an underlying electrical problem. These questions indicate that prospective buyers are cautious about the vehicle's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Rub3n23 appreciates the vehicle as a nice driver and wishes the seller good luck with the sale. @DaveDep compliments the color, while @MJHE30 describes it as a perfect project car for someone looking to change the exterior color. @sy1616 also expresses good wishes to the seller, stating it is a nice car, and @BuzzFFR1273 acknowledges the transparency of the seller regarding the work done on the car.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle raise questions regarding the authenticity and history of its replacement engine. @GotF1 asks for more details about the engine replacement, and @DieselM333 inquires about the mileage on it. Meanwhile, @bhagen23 requests further images of common rust areas and specific panels, indicating a desire for greater transparency about the car's condition. @Boomster emphasizes the practicality of using aftermarket parts based on market prices, while @S38Bruce humorously invites others to his shop, contributing to a light-hearted discussion among enthusiasts.
Negative: Several comments express skepticism about the vehicle's condition and the seller's claims. @Joe-BMW critiques the labor and parts expenses claimed by the seller, suggesting they are inflated and indicating that he sees the car as more of a project, needing significant work. @magguu agrees with earlier comments about visible paintwork discrepancies on the car, calling them 'super obvious'. The seller, @Reconjr, defends the car against these critiques but faces challenges in convincing skeptics like @Joe-BMW, who feels that the seller's approach lacks professionalism, hindering potential interest in the auction.
|
 |
Positive: @po_box_33 reminisced about owning the same car in teal green and expressed their love for it, indicating a strong emotional connection to the vehicle. @Vtec4ever praised it as the ultimate commute car, highlighting its reliability and the quality Honda once prioritized, suggesting that this model is superior to current models. @Dollycat3 also shared enthusiasm by describing the car as a great low mileage find, reflecting a positive perception of its value and condition.
Neutral: Several comments show a blend of curiosity and nostalgia regarding the car. @Johnsim77 inquired about the timing belt change, acknowledging the car's impressive low mileage while emphasizing the need for maintenance history. @Needcar asked multiple questions about the car's operational status and condition, demonstrating practical interest. Overall, these comments illustrate a balanced perspective, acknowledging the car's appeal while seeking further information.
Negative: There were some reservations expressed in the comments. @Dyl911 raised concerns about the lack of detailed maintenance records which could affect perceived reliability. @0tradewind0 felt the car would be perfect only if it were a 5-speed model, implying a lack of enthusiasm for its current automatic configuration. Additionally, @eric1881's query about the timing belt change highlights potential issues regarding the vehicle's upkeep that could dissuade prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, highlighting its beautiful aesthetics and impressive features. @S4rocket and other enthusiasts appreciated the stunning design and specific details like the seats. @Abuelo and @boaboyoz both expressed their admiration, labeling the car as great. The @Seller further emphasized the car's remarkable qualities and honest presentation, assuring potential bidders of the vehicle's exceptional condition. Additionally, enthusiasts admired the engineering behind the AMG Speedshift-R gearbox, deeming it a superb option that enhances performance while reducing the risk of engine abuse. Overall, the positive comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's beauty, engineering, and status as a collectible item.
Neutral: Several comments sought more technical details about the car, with individuals like @kbulo and @ncdriver996 inquiring about service history and maintenance specifics. These requests for clarification reflect a genuine interest in understanding the car's background, maintenance, and any potential issues that could affect its performance. The seller's responses indicated transparency regarding the vehicle's condition, with detailed explanations provided about previous service, tire depth variances, and minor imperfections. This back-and-forth illustrated a constructive engagement between potential buyers and the seller about the vehicle's nuances and history, showcasing an interest in informed decision-making rather than a purely emotive response to the car's appearance.
Negative: Negative comments predominantly revolved around concerns over the vehicle's transmission and overall integrity. @moonbeam996GT3 expressed confusion over why a dealer would present a low-fuel vehicle and highlighted the lack of a German-made Mezger engine, wishing for a more original configuration. Additionally, @Juice312 and others questioned the presence of scratches and marks on a car that was advertised as having low mileage, suggesting that there might be discrepancies in the vehicle's indicated condition. @ncdriver996 pointed out the oddity of brake pads being replaced so frequently in relation to mileage, raising concerns about the car's service history. Overall, some comments reflected skepticism about the car’s current status and the seller's representations, illustrating a common hesitation among potential buyers wary of common pitfalls in used vehicle sales.
|
 |
Positive: @Bjaguar (The Seller) describes the vehicle as fast and handling well, thanks to the Dinan upgrades. Commenters like @Igfortun appreciate the E90s and refer to the car as a beautiful example, while @BIGDTM.MOE highlights the rarity of Dinan cars from this generation and praises its many upgrades. Additionally, @getouth acknowledges it as a nice example, further emphasizing its appeal in the auction.
Neutral: @Bjaguar (The Seller) provides thorough details about the car's condition, mentioning it has all original panels and no paintwork except for the rear bumper, which had minor damage from a previous owner. He also addresses inquiries about the vehicle's specs and modifications, despite being away from the car. The seller invites potential buyers to see the car in person and engages with questions from bidders, indicating a willingness to facilitate the sale process.
Negative: While the vehicle seems to be in excellent condition overall, there are minor details that may concern potential buyers, such as the slight scratches mentioned on the driver’s rear wheel opening and the underside of the front bumper. @DriveMsport raises specific questions about the wheel specifications and assumptions about potential scratches, indicating that some bidders are looking for more clarity on issues that might affect the car's value.
|
 |
Positive: @DavisFordBuickGMC believes that this Bronco year and model is the best of all time. @Barryward suggests that the vehicle represents a classic American spirit, as one that 'the lone ranger would be proud to drive.' Additionally, @hypwr65 expresses familiarity with the Bronco, noting its previous well-sorted condition and beautiful paint job, indicating this vehicle is a reliable choice for its next owner. @mbrandonmotorcars highlights the effort made by the consignor to maintain and improve the Bronco, making it appealing to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in a discussion about the full airbrush stripe versus the chromatic stripe of the Bronco, with @gmagno and @MontanaBroncos trying to clarify the differences and the potential rarity of the airbrush design. @CDehne mentions a preferred material choice for the seats, suggesting alternatives while acknowledging the current seats. @Nolsen21 inquires about audio equipment and seat fabric differences, indicating curiosity about specific features without expressing a strong opinion.
Negative: Conversely, there are concerns surrounding the vehicle's condition and details. @gmagno mentions possible discrepancies or lack of clarity regarding the vehicle's history, especially regarding repair times, and feels skeptical about the thoroughness of past maintenance. There is also a suggestion from @71f100 about the absence of a spare tire and rack, hinting at potential oversights during restoration. Overall, while some appreciate the Bronco, others express doubts about its modifications and repairs.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the E28 M5, highlighting its beauty and significance in BMW's M history. @Mfwhitlock described it as a "holy smokes what a beauty," and others echoed sentiments of longing for similar models they had owned. @dakotamatt noted the near-perfect condition of almost every detail, emphasizing the skill of EAG in maintaining such a high standard. Comments like @m57x5's reflected on the timeless design and automotive history the vehicle represents, inciting excitement about its auction success.
Neutral: The seller, @eagbmw, engaged with potential buyers, providing detailed responses to inquiries about the vehicle's maintenance and condition. They clarified specifics such as the removal of the self-leveling suspension in favor of Bilstein options and the current condition of various parts, including the headliner and pillars. Additionally, the auction attracted various perspectives on the competitive nature of the BMW market, particularly comparing the E28 M5 with other models like the M6. Some users noted their personal experiences with these cars, highlighting the cultural significance and driving enjoyment associated with the M5.
Negative: While many comments were positive, some potential buyers raised concerns about specific aspects of the car. @LouG and others inquired about a noted hole and the condition of the suspension and were met with clarifications from the seller. Additionally, some remarks hinted at disappointment in the rarity of color options for US models, with @mfdoc questioning the vehicle's original VIN tags, suggesting a curiosity over its preservation. Overall, while the majority of feedback was enthusiastic, there were a few reservations reflected in the discussions.
|
 |
Positive: @cgreco15 highlighted the vehicle's beauty and excellent care by an enthusiast owner, stating it's a beautiful example. @kkassim, a previous owner, expressed love for the car, sharing fond memories of enjoying it and wishing the current owner well during the sale. Additionally, @1600VeloceAssist (The Seller) emphasized their support for a successful auction process and the thorough record-keeping from the current owner, ensuring transparency for prospective buyers.
Neutral: @dakotamatt clarified that the vehicle is a normal US Spec S38B36 3.6L and noted specific engineering differences between the various S38 engines. @1600VeloceAssist (The Seller) made adjustments to the listing based on @dakotamatt's feedback, while also responding to inquiries about the vehicle's condition, indicating no cracks in the dashboard and mentioning normal sweating around the cylinder head drain back due to age. In terms of the steering wheel, @rx_jagetc provided insight into the inaccuracy of the current wheel while noting the rarity of the 1993 M5, which is of interest to enthusiasts.
Negative: @Order66 questioned the authenticity of the vehicle's original aspects, including the steering wheel and engine specifications, expressing skepticism about its classification. @Erikrapp1 raised concerns about potential oil seepage, asking for confirmation on whether it was just a gasket issue or something more severe. @maxforza expressed worries about the vehicle's transmission including any potential issues with syncros or noise. Additionally, @rx_jagetc warned about the potential oil leaking from the drain back tube, which could lead to stinky situations if not addressed.
|
 |
Positive: @jagmansr reflects positively on their past experience with a 2003 R, calling it the best car they ever owned and noting that they would bid on this one if they didn’t already own an Xf Sportbrake. @HeavyTank77 shares a fond memory of owning a similar model, mentioning its speed and reliability after addressing some initial issues. The comments from @GMTV_GIVEMETHEVIN (The Seller) reassure potential buyers about the car's strong performance and consistent maintenance history, highlighting that it runs great and has been well cared for with 24 service histories recorded on Carfax.
Neutral: @Next-N-Line inquires about the mileage @jagmansr put on their previous vehicle, while @Fleuger99 requests clarification on the condition of a reported scratch on the car. Additionally, @olddatsun12 seeks information about the headliner and the condition of the catalytic converters, reflecting general curiosity rather than strong opinions. @alfa02 sends a private message about necessary maintenance that should have been done by 100,000 miles, indicating the importance of service history in evaluating the vehicle.
Negative: @Fleuger99 expresses concern regarding the scratch and its visibility in the listed photos, which raises questions about the accuracy of the vehicle's presentation. @olddatsun12 questions whether there has been any water damage from the inoperative sunroof, implying potential issues that buyers should be wary of. @HeavyTank77 notes past experiences with reliability issues such as HVAC problems and cooling system maintenance, suggesting that the seller must address these concerns to stabilize the vehicle's desirability at auction.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters are impressed with the vehicle, highlighting its collector's item status and good looks. @bosshoss3406pack kicks off enthusiasm by referring to it as a 'HOTROD' and emphasizing the special edition nature of the truck. @Kidsixpack remarked on its rarity, while @Clarkecars praised its groundbreaking design that transformed the market, noting its spacious interior and comfort compared to competitors. @Electraglider added historical context regarding the truck's market impact, acknowledging its appeal. Overall, there's a strong appreciation for the truck's aesthetic and performance attributes.
Neutral: The truck's current condition and location have been a point of discussion. @GPlunkett inquired about specifics like the truck's location and operational issues, receiving confirmation from @choicedealsnc2017, the seller, that everything functions correctly and is based in Raleigh, NC. Furthermore, comments requesting undercarriage photos and tire date codes reflect a practical interest in verifying the state of the vehicle, with @WA2FST noting its cleanliness and maintenance.
Negative: Some comments brought up concerns regarding the reliability of the engine, specifically the 5.9 Magnum. @acett described personal experience with manifold issues that led to multiple replacements and engine damage. @Clarkecars defended the reliability of the 5.9 engine but acknowledged that issues can arise from poor servicing. Additionally, there was a mention of the importance of undercarriage photos, especially considering the truck's history and location in Iowa, with @edensker expressing concerns about typical wear and maintenance over the years.
|
 |
Positive: @Barryward expressed enthusiasm for owning this vehicle, suggesting that it would bring joy to its owner. @stugottz praised the attractive color combination, reminiscing about a similar car from their past that was a family favorite. @gtjoey1314 fondly recalled owning a Cartier edition of the car, describing it as "a pillow on wheels" and lamenting that Ford doesn't produce vehicles of that caliber anymore.
Neutral: @cutoosunny (The Seller) provided clarifications in response to several inquiries, confirming the car's cold A/C and fully functional climate controls, as well as addressing the originality of the motor and mileage at 34,000. @jrb007 wondered about the reason for the quick sale after hardly any use, and @LBCDan_1984 noted the car's previous appearance on a car testing channel, adding context to its history. Several commenters requested additional photos of the undercarriage and other parts of the vehicle.
Negative: Commenters raised concerns about the accuracy of the undercarriage photos, with @Mercury88 suggesting that they might not be from the Lincoln Town Car. @extratall speculated about the seller potentially being a car flipper and pointed out the car's history of being sold from Texas after spending most of its life in Pennsylvania. @GAK911 questioned the authenticity of the mileage and reminded that details on a Carfax report can't always be trusted.
|
 |
Positive: Comments from @Mercuryman and @Drew510 highlight the good looks and functionality of the GMC Sierra 1500HD. @Drew510 shares positive experiences with the Quadrasteer system, emphasizing its effective performance, especially for towing. Users appreciate the benefits of increased stability at high speeds and improved turning radius. Overall, there is a consensus among several users that this vehicle has many advantages and features that contribute to its appeal, with @Quadrasteer_Denali noting how the Quadrasteer option enhances the driving experience.
Neutral: Several users, including @choicedealsnc2017 (The Seller) and @cgsmith0524, request additional information about the vehicle, such as underside pictures and videos demonstrating the Quadrasteer functionality. This indicates a general desire for transparency and confidence in the vehicle's condition and operational capabilities. Commenters like @GasTurbine share mixed thoughts regarding maintenance, suggesting that while the truck is appealing, the Quadrasteer system may require more upkeep.
Negative: Comments from @juranti raise concerns about the truck's history, questioning whether it has been involved in a flood, which the seller, @choicedealsnc2017, denies. Other users, like @GasTurbine, mention that the Quadrasteer system adds complexity and potential maintenance challenges, suggesting that it can lead to more scheduled and unscheduled upkeep. Additionally, @richhalvorson expresses some frustrations with maneuverability, describing the handling of the truck as cumbersome in specific situations. Overall, there are underlying worries about maintenance costs and vehicle condition.
|
 |
Positive: @02fanatic celebrates the Jeep ZJ’s durability, reminiscing about their own '96 Orvis Edition which lasted 235,000 miles, sharing enthusiasm for the distinct feel of these classic models. @CaptainCanada emphasizes the quality of the vehicles listed by the seller and appreciates seeing the transition to Washington state amidst previous tariff challenges. @Tnbusiness71 reassures potential Canadian buyers about the simplicity and lack of costs involved in bringing the vehicle back from the U.S., highlighting the successful handling of international transactions, boosting confidence in the seller's expertise.
Neutral: @fm471 asks for confirmation regarding the vehicle's compliance with California regulations, while @CaptainSkol inquires about the exact first registration date for customs purposes in Germany, demonstrating the international interest in the vehicle. @Tnbusiness71 addresses these questions by confirming compliance with EPA standards and providing the first registration date, ensuring that buyers remain informed about the vehicle's legal status. @Zork1 requests more detailed images of the undercarriage to assess rust conditions, to which the seller promptly responds, assuring that cleaner images will be provided soon and addressing concerns about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @Zork1 and @DPitman express concerns regarding the quality of video presentations for the auction, with @DPitman specifically noting issues with glitching in the walk-around video. Despite @Zork1's positive feedback on the video quality, @DPitman still has doubts, indicating that such technical issues could potentially affect buyer confidence. Additionally, @fsacb3 expresses apprehension about the age of the tires, stating that they wouldn't risk driving on 20-year-old tires regardless of their visual condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally praised the 2016 Cadillac CT6 Platinum for its elegant design and presence on the road. @Featherlite particularly appreciated its styling, noting that it was nicely optioned with low mileage and highlighted the effectiveness of the magnetic ride control, which is seen as a great feature for long-distance travel. Additionally, @david42 reminisced positively about a similar model, emphasizing its agility and comfort features like the 34-speaker stereo system, which contributed to a luxurious driving experience.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the condition of the vehicle and some technical aspects. @KMBCars inquired about the transmission fluid service history, highlighting a common issue with the transmission fluid that has been noted in other models. The seller, @rclapper, provided clarifications about the transmission fluid service schedule and mentioned that the vehicle had been carefully maintained. @ldc1955 asked about the infotainment system controls and received detailed responses regarding the physical buttons used for climate control, indicating the seller's willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments expressed concerns about the vehicle's performance and specific issues related to longevity. @neverenoughgold shared disappointment about the 8-speed transmission, wishing they had opted for a newer model with a smoother transmission. @1Marauder raised inquiries about the age and condition of the tires, suggesting that new tires may be necessary. Additionally, comments indicated minor cosmetic issues like the bubbling leather on the dashboard, which @Featherlite noted but believed could be easily fixed, reflecting some worries about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle for its aesthetics and build quality, with @FreddieLola calling it a "beautiful build!" and @boaboyoz expressing that the 992.1 Turbo S in Chalk over Slate Gray is "impeccable and incredible." Others echoed similar sentiments, with @JHBBII simply noting it as "Drop Dead Gorgeous!!!" The car's aggressive design features, like the GT3 style wheels, carbon aero kit, and rear diffuser, were highlighted positively, indicating a strong admiration for the customization. Additionally, @SCT524 remarked on the car's beauty and inquired about paint protection film (PPF) coverage, which was confirmed by the seller, further solidifying the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: Several comments presented inquiries regarding the car’s details and specifications, such as aftermarket modifications and warranty conditions. For instance, @Odessaflorida asked about the remaining factory warranty and whether the aftermarket exhaust voided it, with the seller responding that there is about a year left and that the exhaust does not void the warranty. Additionally, @GVelvet sought clarification on the brands of the wheels included, which @wickedmotorworks (The Seller) clarified that there are OEM wheels and three sets by Aston Forged wheels. Another neutral inquiry came from @Beneno1, who requested a picture of the hood's underside, indicating a desire for more information about the vehicle's construction.
Negative: While the comments were predominantly positive, there were some criticisms. @cbsue expressed a strong disagreement, stating, "No that is my idea of a bad ass roadster." This comment suggests dissatisfaction with the modifications or potential design of the car. Additionally, @et15 raised a concern regarding the vehicle's California emissions inspection status, questioning why it had not passed, indicating potential complications for buyers in that state. Furthermore, @topshoe pointed out that the gear shift lever appeared to need a boot, which some might find detracting from the overall look of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the vehicle's features, particularly noting the quality of the leather seats, a point that @DannyJoe (The Seller) clarified was a distinctive aspect of the vehicle. The fact that it is a one-owner vehicle is also highlighted positively, suggesting a well-maintained condition and care throughout its history. This information reassures potential buyers regarding the overall quality and value of the vehicle.
Neutral: @mbtech208 brought up an interesting point about the terminology used in past models, specifically the 'Club Coupe' nomenclature. This comment indicates a curiosity about the vehicle's history and how the branding has evolved over the years, which can intrigue those interested in automotive history. The question shows engagement with the vehicle contextually, though it doesn’t offer a strong opinion on its current value or quality.
Negative: There are no explicitly negative comments regarding the vehicle in the gathered feedback. However, the reference to the past naming conventions by @mbtech208 might hint at some dissatisfaction or confusion about the vehicle's historical branding, though this sentiment is more about curiosity than criticism. Thus, the comments do not strongly reflect any negative opinions or experiences related to the car itself.
|
 |
Positive: @Everson198 (The Seller) emphasizes the Jeep Wrangler's excellent condition, noting that it is as clean as the pictures show. The vehicle was discovered in an airplane hangar with no previous paintwork or accidents, further enhancing its appeal. The seller also highlights recent maintenance, including a new battery and completion of a recall, claiming it is ready for the new owner, which adds confidence for potential buyers.
Neutral: The discussion among potential buyers includes questions about specific features and details of the vehicle. @mattjgreene inquired about the suspension while @ponchosdad asked for the tire date codes. @Dheffel1 clarified the tire date code, providing additional information for other commenters. Similarly, @mweingrad asked about the functionality of the winch and its model number, indicating an interest in performance features, while @MilesWhitlock confirmed the wheels are factory Jeep options from a newer model.
Negative: There are no outright negative comments regarding the Jeep Wrangler. However, the inquiry about the winch and other features suggests a thorough examination is expected from potential buyers, possibly highlighting the scrutiny that any vehicle listed for sale must undergo. The questions about the vehicle's components may indicate a desire for absolute clarity and assurance of quality from interested parties.
|
 |
Positive: The comments showcase enthusiasm for the Indian Motorcycles Neon Sign being auctioned by @deniz928. Commenters express interest in its high-quality features, noting the vibrant colors of the neon and the sturdy construction in a commercial-grade steel can. The Seller provides reassurance, indicating it is securely packaged and can be shipped worldwide, which has been positively received by potential bidders.
Neutral: Some participants, like @tnenthusiats and @fmdriver, focus on clarifying the nature of the sign’s material and confirming that the current item is distinct from a previously sold sign. Others inquire about shipping capabilities, such as @mr.corndog's question regarding domestic shipping and crating costs. This indicates a general curiosity about logistics and product specifics.
Negative: There are no overtly negative comments regarding the sign, but the inquiries about past sales and shipping suggest some apprehension among potential buyers. Comments about comparing it to a similar auctioned item may imply doubts about its uniqueness or value in the context of competition. However, these concerns have not significantly detracted from the overall interest in the auction.
|
 |
Positive: @Kiantt11 expressed that the vehicle is their dream car, showcasing a strong emotional connection and desire for this model. @PA_Paul mentioned owning the exact same car and enjoying the driving experience immensely, stating that it brings joy every time they drive it. Additionally, @CMD1, the seller, indicated the appeal of the car's aero package, emphasizing its aesthetic enhancement, and assured potential buyers of forthcoming video content to showcase the vehicle better.
Neutral: @CMD1 (The Seller) provided information regarding recent recalls, stating they have been completed, which speaks to the vehicle's maintenance history. They also clarified that the car did not come with hood insulation, responding to inquiries about this feature. Various comments from @Bptasienski and @tigers196884 suggested a desire for more accurate information in the listing, indicating a need for better article verification regarding model specifics.
Negative: @Jerryekiefer criticized the road test associated with the vehicle, pointing out that it featured outdated information that did not correspond to the model in question. @Tigers196884 similarly questioned the accuracy of the articles attached to the listings, expressing frustration with recurrent inaccuracies in 9-3 model listings. @albertan reinforced this sentiment, noting that such inaccuracies are a common issue, contributing to the overall negativity surrounding the listing's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters like @Sarki and @pmt99 praised the Toyota T100, calling it an amazing truck and one of the best vehicles they've owned, respectively. @CRUSH also expressed admiration while emphasizing the importance of saving Toyota manuals. The seller, @CMD1, showcased the truck's excellent condition, highlighting its one-owner history from the rust-free Pacific Northwest and that it has no undercarriage rust. The seller's ceramic coating and attention to detail also received positive feedback from several commenters, with many noting its eye-catching appeal.
Neutral: Some comments were neutral, focusing on specific features or questions about the truck. @buccicone inquired about the truck's history, asking where it spent most of its life, while @Ange noted a curious mention of dings on the right rear door and asked about the rear doors of the T-100. @Massimo831 pointed out a ripped CV axle boot, and @HandyAndy088 asked about the timing belt service history, showing that they are customers looking for further assurance about the vehicle's maintenance.
Negative: There were negative observations primarily about the undercarriage spray, with @Bosco53 warning against such modifications and raising concerns about transparency. Some commenters noted potential issues, like the ripped CV boot from @84Cressida and questions from @Chamba regarding the miles accumulated in salt-heavy regions. Despite the efforts of the seller to address these concerns, comments like @Chamba's reflected skepticism about the truck's true condition given its history.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the Alfa Romeo Spider, highlighting its beauty and uniqueness. @austin_alfa calls it perfection and a stunner, praising the interior and expressing excitement about its potential. @Slam105 and @Husky44 echo these sentiments, with the latter stating that this is the car they've always needed but never knew existed. Commenters like @Chrispc and @Maeter appreciate the aesthetic appeal of the car, considering it drop-dead gorgeous and a beautiful homage to 50s racers.
Neutral: There are several inquiries about the car's specifics, including its engine origin and chassis history. Commenters like @jockr and @okie_flats seek clarification on the car's documentation and historical significance, particularly about its participation in past races like the Targa Florio. The seller, @KARPARK, provides detailed information about the chassis number, confirms the car runs and drives well, and attempts to address the technical questions about the car's build quality and materials.
Negative: However, some participants are skeptical about the authenticity and originality of the vehicle. Comments from @superleggera13 and @tripleblack raise doubts about whether the car is truly a period build by Alfa Romeo or a modern recreation. They express concern regarding the lack of documentation and question the chassis' provenance. Additionally, @No-subt2 mentions the car's non-operable status since 2018, leading to concerns about its current condition and the need for potential maintenance before driving.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and performance. @Stephenh27 called it a "Beautiful car", while @Jpmcmanus84 described it as an "incredible car" and a "scalpel in the mountains." @biz_jet_guy also praised it by stating it's the "best automobile I've ever owned." Others, like @TD1932, appreciate the vehicle's mileage, stating it has the right amount of miles to drive comfortably. @JMack77 complemented how well the car has been cared for, indicating it has been properly used and enjoyed.
Neutral: Several commenters posed questions seeking clarification on maintenance and inspection history. @SVXRide inquired about the miles on the clutch, and @Dougiefreash asked whether the vehicle was checked for bore scoring. @Peterjohnr sought information on pre-purchase inspections, while @OCMurph and @eshleman62 inquired about IMS bearing inspections and service records. The seller, @slocat4, responded to many inquiries, providing information about inspections and maintenance completed since they purchased the vehicle.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about potential issues with the car, reflecting uncertainty among potential buyers. For instance, @Whodey2670 asked if the vapor separator has blown, noting that it can lead to an expensive repair. Additionally, @GlenShoe suggested obtaining a DME report, which could provide more assurance regarding the vehicle’s condition. Some comments also pointed out existing imperfections like chips on the bumpers, as mentioned by @slocat4, who acknowledged these details but indicated that they add character to the car.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is praised by many for its unique appeal and historical significance. @Leonia describes it as a 'sweet ride,' appreciating its overall desirability. @69KenoshaCorncob fondly recalls memories associated with the car, calling it an amazing example, while @CarDogThreePedals describes it as a genuine retired 'mounty mountie' and expresses positive sentiments about the listing. The @Thedrummondcollection shares a personal experience of successfully importing a similar vehicle from Canada and highlights a consistent positive experience with SSP cars, while multiple commentors express appreciation for the vehicle's nostalgia and connection to law enforcement history.
Neutral: There are comments seeking clarification on legal matters regarding the vehicle's operation, particularly in Canada, where @mrcanoehead explains the restrictions on decommissioned police vehicles and emphasizes the need for compliance with local laws. @leonia also asks about legalities, which invites informative responses from several users, including insights on border regulations from @Justification and @Johnnymopar, who mentions the recent government actions taken against selling RCMP vehicles to the public. The seller, @racer355, provides detailed information about the car's features and history, stating their readiness to answer inquiries and showing a commitment to transparency.
Negative: Concerns around the legality and historical incidents related to ex-police vehicles in Canada arise in the comments. @Johnnymopar discusses a tragic event involving an ex-RCMP vehicle used inappropriately, detailing the subsequent legal restrictions that were implemented. Meanwhile, @fishdoc expresses apprehension about the vehicle's usability in Canada due to its seasonal driving conditions, suggesting that it might not be practical for year-round use. Additionally, some comments reflect upon operative issues, such as @worldclassmotorcarsny pointing out discrepancies regarding the vehicle's window specifications, indicating a potential misunderstanding that might affect buyer interest.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a "beautiful ride!" and a "stunning car," with @Driver82 highlighting it as a representation of America at its peak. @JoeMig called it "an American work of art," while @excaliburmotorsports (The Seller) emphasized its rarity, noting that only 1800 were produced in 1957. The aesthetics were universally praised, with @cruzahome mentioning its elegance and @TommyBruin referring to it as pure elegance. The use of gold wheels was particularly appealing, with @JoyriderTX expressing appreciation for their visual appeal alongside the car's distinctive red finish.
Neutral: Several comments delved into specifics regarding the car's condition and historical context, indicating a mix of opinions. @pdavid2 raised concerns about the vehicle's running condition, questioning past repair work and asking about additional components like a convertible top cover. Topics such as color authenticity were discussed by @Bordeaux and @JV3NY, who provided insights into restoration challenges and paint discrepancies. Additionally, @rumbee inquired about the functionality of electrical and mechanical components, indicating an interest in thorough examination rather than merely aesthetic appreciation. These comments showed a blend of enthusiasm and a desire for deeper knowledge regarding the vehicle's quality.
Negative: Despite the many compliments, there were critical remarks regarding the car's condition and history. @Billadoc6ujj pointed out potential issues with the reproduction data tag, and @Artdan criticized missing components and the correctness of the car's color. @NameTaken2 noted a loose steering wheel issue that raised concerns about the vehicle's overall handling. Some comments, like that from @F92S63M8, conveyed skepticism about the seller's claims of the car's beauty while implying a need for more transparency about its actual state. This blend of caution highlighted the complexity of vintage car transactions where aesthetics must be weighed against verified integrity and functionality.
|
 |
Positive: The 1939 Velocette KSS is highly praised for its historical significance and aesthetic appeal. @austin_alfa expresses admiration for the bravery of past racers and appreciates the craftsmanship of the bike, calling it a magnificent machine from a legendary maker. @MNberg describes it as a beautifully designed motorcycle embodying timeless elegance, noting its stellar engine details and overall form. Many comments reflect a shared nostalgia and respect for this pre-war British icon, with multiple users recalling fond personal experiences with Velocette motorcycles.
Neutral: Several comments delve into the unique handling characteristics and mechanical nuances of the Velocette KSS. @DaveD (The Seller) shares insights about the bike’s restoration and the adjustments needed for the foot shift mechanism, noting that the bike operates well for leisurely rides but might require some tweaks for better performance. Commenters like @Gridder inquire about the skill level required to adjust the shift linkage, while @Rocketshoes attentively asks about the recent engine rebuild and the bike's readiness for longer rides. There's a mutual understanding of the bike's vintage technology and the need for sympathetic handling.
Negative: Some comments hint at underlying concerns with the bike's shifting mechanism and overall readiness for rigorous riding. @Gridder questions why the shift linkage needs adjustments, implying a potential lack of confidence in the gearbox repair. @Rocketshoes expresses skepticism about whether the bike is ready for anything more than casual outings, highlighting the possibility of a learning curve with its vintage gear changes. @solidol also expresses that while he might be interested, his present collection is already full, suggesting that the Velocette's appeal might be tempered by practical concerns about ownership.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's beauty and condition. @Baldhippie highlights its good looks and low mileage. @bemrfst and @RAllen8800 also appreciate the aesthetic features, particularly the three side windows and the cool Diehard Incredicell battery monitor. @excaliburmotorsports (The Seller) adds that the vehicle comes with numerous original documents and certifications, enhancing its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Some commenters provide insights or ask relevant questions about the car's features. @FleetwoodEldorado inquires about the A/C functionality and the visibility of touch-up paint, while @rsb79 questions whether the mileage is actual and if the original radio is included. @CarFoolLane remarks on the instrumentation and suggests modern modifications for the audio system, showing a mix of curiosity and technical interest in the vehicle's features.
Negative: There are some concerns raised about certain aspects of the car. @Baldhippie notes that the 351 M-code engine, while popular in its time, may be less desirable in the current market. Additionally, @FleetwoodEldorado mentions the potential for the touch-up paint to stand out, indicating a possible issue with the vehicle's appearance. Some skepticism exists around the vehicle's originality, as @rsb79 points out the importance of verifying the mileage.
|
 |
Positive: @gravytrain9 described the vehicle as gorgeous, and many others like @GDogg echoed this sentiment by highlighting the spectacular ownership demonstrated over the years and the attention to care given to the RS America. @MasterDebator remarked that it is a well-loved and driven example of its kind, with @bamaNator expressing admiration for the seller's commitment to preserving the car for enjoyment by future owners. The seller, @944sapphire, has built a strong narrative around the care and enhancements made to the vehicle, further contributing to its appeal.
Neutral: The comments from @965 and @Steven007 provided technical insights into the vehicle's condition, asking about paintwork, suspension components, and customization details which suggest a well-maintained car. Other users, like @Caymanorcarrera, remarked on the lack of repair invoices and photos of past accidents, acknowledging that while the vehicle has a history, it still retains much of its original character and appeal. @Rcas310 and @blakeGT3 also inquired about more specific details relating to past repairs and event participation, reinforcing the transparency that the seller, @944sapphire, aims to convey.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle's history, particularly @Caymanorcarrera who questioned the lack of photos related to past damage, suggesting it might be an issue for potential buyers. Additionally, @Just_me humorously noted the risk of allowing students to drive; a light-hearted comment that indirectly references the need for scrutiny on the car's history. @bamaNator relayed a stern warning about instructors being hard on cars, indicating possible apprehension about the car's usage during driver education events.
|
 |
Positive: @mattbirdy expressed admiration for the vehicle's stunning appearance, highlighting the gorgeous Black Cherry Mica color that captivates onlookers. He referred to the car as an 'absolutely beautiful specimen of a Miata,' showcasing his appreciation and satisfaction with the car's aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: @goixoye inquired about practical details regarding the vehicle, such as the availability of an owner's manual and whether service records are provided. He also requested confirmation on the condition of key features including the top, power accessories, and the stereo. The Seller, @Thtrog, responded affirmatively to these questions, indicating that the car does indeed come with the original owner's manual, has partial service records in the Carfax, and confirmed that all accessories are functional. The top is noted to be original and in excellent condition, free from leaks or damages.
Negative: While there were no explicitly negative comments made, @goixoye's questions about the lack of comprehensive service history for the timing belt and the need for specific photos suggest a level of skepticism or concern regarding the vehicle's overall condition. His queries hint at the importance of transparency and thorough details when assessing the reliability and maintenance history of the car.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the overall appeal of the 2013 Honda CB1100, with several users praising its smooth ride and attractive design. @RobBob911 noted that it is a very pleasant bike to ride, emphasizing its smoothness and reliability, which aligns with the positive sentiments expressed by @Citabria98, who echoed appreciation for @RobBob911's comment. Furthermore, @nightraveler69 complemented the blue tank, stating it looks the best, showcasing a preference for this specific color over others.
Neutral: Several users inquired about the condition and specifications of the bike, showing a general interest in understanding more about it. @fixerny and @RWN525 asked about the original battery and tires, while @tfrain sought clarification on the presence of ABS, indicating a standard curiosity for potential buyers. @Superhawk65, the seller, provided detailed responses indicating the original battery had been replaced but the tires were still original, maintaining transparency regarding the bike's condition.
Negative: There were some expressions of concern from potential buyers regarding the bike's original components and setup. @bstaggs questioned whether the exhaust was factory, and @RWN525 was specifically interested in the original tank, indicating a desire to know if any alterations had been made. Additionally, @Rander05 asked for financial details related to the original tank's potential sale, suggesting some hesitance about the completeness of the auction offering.
|
 |
Positive: @ttocs6991 (The Seller) describes the vehicle as running and driving great, with all electronics functioning properly and no unpleasant odors, indicating a well-maintained car. Additionally, the Seller highlights that the car is clean for its mileage, and they plan to provide videos for potential bidders. They also mention a brand new battery and recently replaced valve cover gaskets, further emphasizing the vehicle's good condition.
Neutral: There have been inquiries about the timing belt change and service records, with @extratall expressing curiosity about the vehicle's MT title despite its history in MD and FL. @mike0609 offers a suggestion to load the VIN on Lexus.com to check the service history, to which the Seller responds positively, indicating they will try to access the online records. @Choopie questions the color of the car, while @Pstackhouse and @cdwatnsu ask about specific functionalities, showing interest in the vehicle's features.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's maintenance, particularly from @thedude2, who suggests that the water pump and timing belt need replacing. The Seller acknowledges this and offers to complete the repairs for an additional fee if the high bidder is interested. Furthermore, @cdwatnsu asks about the functionality of various components, indicating potential issues that may need addressing.
|
 |
Positive: @Peterdeutsch describes the vehicle as a gem, appreciating its original "tooled" vinyl interior, and shares fond memories of using a similar vehicle for camping trips in the 70s. @rmwcali echoes this sentiment, noting that the Blazers improve in appearance over time, while @Beans_Bacon emphasizes the rising trend of Bronco and Blazer collectability over Mustangs and Camaros. @Gshaw1118 (The Seller) also adds a positive note, stating that the vehicle drives well after the addition of a fox steering stabilizing kit.
Neutral: Several commenters seek clarification on specifics about the vehicle. @joeracer69 inquires about potential damage to the passenger door, gear ratio in the axles, and the availability of original build paperwork from the previous owner. @72K5Floyd asks for information on the tracks related to the different model years and also about the build sheet's contents in the glove box. @Eatinsteaks questions the paint code's similarity to medium olive, indicating interest in the vehicle's details.
Negative: @joeracer69's comments about scratches on the door sill and potential damage suggest concerns about the vehicle's condition. Similarly, @72K5Floyd's focus on the accuracy of the track sizes points to uncertainty about the vehicle's restoration or modification history. Although no major criticisms were raised, these concerns reflect a cautious view among some commenters regarding the vehicle's overall state.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's strengths, especially its versatility and performance. @milage describes it as a sweet spot in the nighthawk lineup and appreciates the weight balance for both town and highway usage. @Pete_in_PA shares a long-term positive experience, noting the bike's low maintenance, including no valve adjustments, and great handling. The bike's smooth fueling and traditional design, as opposed to the more modern, complex bikes, were also noted as major advantages. @heater616 (The Seller) emphasizes that the bike is in great running condition and suitable for riding back to South Philly, which reassures potential buyers about its reliability.
Neutral: Some comments fall into a neutral territory, providing practical observations without strong feelings attached. @dramaband asks a straightforward question about the bike's running condition, indicating a desire to ensure the vehicle is ready for a longer ride. @FX3_4 points out specific details regarding the oil filter placement and installation, noting its challenges but also recognizing the overall quality of the bike. The comments reflect a common focus on maintenance and usability aspects, which are important for potential buyers.
Negative: A few drawbacks are mentioned, particularly regarding the bike's design quirks. @FX3_4 criticizes the oil filter's position, saying it can be messy and difficult to reach. @Pete_in_PA mentions the tachometer as a concern, hinting at a potential weakness for future maintenance. Overall, while these negative remarks indicate room for improvement, they do not overshadow the overall positive reputation of the bike, suggesting that while it has some flaws, many owners are still very satisfied with its performance.
|
 |
Positive: The 1964 Dodge Polara 500 Convertible has garnered a lot of admiration for its originality and classic muscle car design. @exoticcarconnections highlighted its status as a survivor with just 39,950 actual miles, showcasing the car's impressive condition and authenticity. Commenters such as @Dollycat3 and @carmanger praised its beauty and unique color combination, emphasizing that it is a real pleasure to see such well-preserved vehicles from the golden era of Mopar. The big-block 383 engine and Torqueflite automatic transmission are seen as significant advantages, providing both power and drivability, making it an appealing choice for collectors and classic car aficionados alike.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed their perspectives on the vehicle's qualities and characteristics. @63impalaboy provided a thoughtful analysis, comparing the Polara's features with competing models from other manufacturers, acknowledging its lighter weight and engineering advantages. @CarWatchBlues noted the stylish elements of the design, particularly appreciating the side brightwork, while @neilpierson25 admired the tail light design. Discussions regarding potential issues, such as the condition of the rear brakes, were also present, with @FlyPanther seeking clarification from the seller and @CarWatchBlues sharing insights based on personal experiences with similar vehicles.
Negative: On the other hand, some comments reflected skepticism towards the vehicle's presentation. @63impalaboy took a critical stance on the reliance on paint meter readings, suggesting they may not be as relevant to most buyers. @neverenoughgold expressed disappointment with the floor shifter, favoring the nostalgic button-style ignition instead. The discussion around the rear brakes also raised concerns, particularly about a rattling noise and potential maintenance issues, indicated by multiple commenters discussing past experiences with brake difficulties in similar models. Overall, while many appreciate the vehicle's charm, there are concerns regarding its mechanical condition and practical appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @FalconFlyer praised the vehicle as a beautiful car, highlighting its overall aesthetics. @a410traveler commended it as an excellent unmolested example, expressing appreciation for the six-cylinder and four-speed combination, also reminiscing about having a similar model. @surf-n-drag remarked on the uniqueness of the car, emphasizing its role in marking a shift in American automobile design and wishing for the convertible top to operate as well as the one on their own car. @57charlie expressed a deep affection for the 1963 Ford Falcon Futura, calling it the only Ford they have ever loved.
Neutral: The seller, @vfnrcc, provided a detailed overview of their experience and commitment to quality in their listings, noting that each vehicle is carefully picked with a focus on transparency and thorough inspection. @gbctid requested a video showcasing the functionality of the convertible roof, while @DodgeM37 inquired about correcting the title to reflect the proper VIN number, to which @vfnrcc responded affirmatively. @bstewartt also asked for close-up images of the tire size and date codes, complimenting the vehicle yet again as a beautiful example.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @DodgeM37 regarding documentation, asking if the title could be corrected, indicating potential issues with the vehicle's registration. @Sharrol-Celby asked a technical question regarding the Dagenham transmission's synchronizer, unknowingly suggesting an area of uncertainty about the vehicle's performance aspects. Overall, although the comments were mostly appreciative, they did highlight areas needing clarity about the vehicle's documentation and technical specifications.
|
2003 Harley-Davidson Electra Glide Ultra Classic 100th Anniversary
1HD1FCW403Y621984
Lot 201738
Private Party
 |
Positive: @pennzo expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it absolutely stunning and mentioning how it would fit nicely in their collection alongside their other bikes. @dblack12, the seller, highlighted the excellent condition of the bike, emphasizing that it looks and drives like new and providing reassurance about its maintenance history.
Neutral: @Basil017 pointed out that with the vehicle being done 36K miles, expectations for it to be bug-free are reasonable, suggesting a level of trust in its reliability. @Charliejones408 suggested that other users should refrain from negative remarks as sellers are trying their best to provide information and sell their vehicles, which relates to the general atmosphere of the discussion.
Negative: @dblack12, the seller, acknowledged the challenge of handling the bike at their age, indirectly raising concerns about the suitability of the vehicle for all riders. Although @pennzo inquired about the rear tire's replacement, the comment could imply uncertainty regarding the overall condition of the bike.
|
 |
Positive: The 2005 Audi S4 Cabriolet is presented as a well-preserved and maintained vehicle with a clean title, no accidents, and a non-smoker history. The seller, @SRTAMG150, notes that the vehicle was purchased from the family estate of the original owner, highlighting its overall good care and maintenance. The car has undergone various services logged in the Carfax and is mechanically sound, with a quiet cold start, responsive handling, and no issues with the engine or suspension. The interior is intact with factory badges and the rare carbon fiber trim, adding to its appeal as a potential collector's item or enjoyable cruiser.
Neutral: In terms of condition, the vehicle has undergone thorough inspections, and the seller has provided details such as a recent routine oil change and air conditioning service. The convertible top and its mechanism are in great working order, and the wheel and brake conditions are described positively. @montentoyz raised questions regarding any mechanical leaks or necessary replacements, to which the seller confirmed that no leaks were found and everything is functional, including electronics and the vehicle's heating and cooling systems. The tires, though older, still have good tread depth, making them suitable for further use.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's age and some parts needing replacement in the near future. For example, while the seller has confirmed the condition of the tires and brakes, the age of the tires is noted which could imply that they might need attention soon. Additionally, the carbon fiber trim does have two cracks on the passenger door, which detracts from the otherwise pristine condition of the vehicle. Overall, while the car is described positively, there are signs of wear that potential buyers might need to consider.
|
 |
Positive: @AngelsMotors (The Seller) expresses excitement about introducing the rare Soviet Army motorcycle, Dnepr K-750, highlighting its fun 2-wheel drive feature appropriate for off-road use. The motorcycle comes equipped with an electric starter and a reverse gear, which are considered valuable upgrades. Additionally, @Pace_Adorno compliments the rig and appreciates the profile of the bike, indicating a positive experience with similar vehicles in the past. @AngelsMotors reassures potential buyers about the motorcycle's excellent condition and thoughtful restoration, reflecting confidence in the product.
Neutral: @GBRBiLL comments on the design similarities between the Dnepr and Ural motorcycles, mentioning that there is no official relationship but acknowledges the resemblance in design aspects like 2WD. @Pace_Adorno questions the type of fuel used in the 1967 model and the potential need for lead additives, indicating an inquisitive mindset about maintaining classic motorcycles. @DaveD makes a light-hearted comment about starting the bidding process, which doesn't convey any specific opinion on the vehicle itself but reflects the lively atmosphere of the auction.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the Dnepr motorcycle in the provided information. All remarks lean towards positive or neutral tones, with no criticisms or adverse opinions presented.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle reflect a strong appreciation for its quality and rarity. @bowtie6772 described it as a "nice little short bed," while @rlromero praised the undercarriage, noting it hasn't been subjected to brine or salt, suggesting good maintenance. @Classichondaman highlighted the truck's versatility, calling it a capable "sport truck" and mentioning that the truck appears to be a nice example. Additionally, @HoopersAuto (The Seller) emphasized the truck's excellent running condition and care it's received from being family-owned, asserting that it's hard to find such an example with the sought-after 5.3L V8 and short bed configuration.
Neutral: Inquiries about the truck's features were raised, such as @Benzo63 asking about the XM satellite radio receiver installation, specifically the location of the antenna and its operational status. @HoopersAuto (The Seller) promptly addressed this query, confirming that the antenna is located on the roof and that the XM radio functions properly, although activation requires a service fee.
Negative: There were no negative comments or concerns expressed regarding the vehicle in the discussion. The overall feedback has been positive, with a focus on the truck's condition, capabilities, and appreciation for its unique status in the market.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the car's aesthetics and overall quality. @Carnut4ever highlighted their love for the vehicle but also noted concerns about the seat leather durability. @Infrared_Gradient appreciated the performance modifications, while @Nhskibm, a former owner, praised the car's beauty and reliability, stating it transforms the driving experience. @Texasnoiz referred to the car as "insanely good looking" and likened it to a celebrity, showcasing the strong visual appeal people see in it. Commenters like @kflounders and @LeFauch, the seller, emphasized its outstanding modifications and reliability, stating it’s a dream to work on and a stunning car.
Neutral: @LeFauch (The Seller) provided insights regarding the vehicle's history and his reason for selling, noting that he has enjoyed 5k miles in the car and is looking forward to an exciting auction, citing family plans as a motivating factor for the sale. Other commenters, like @ThatOldCarSmell and @polsonGriz, posed questions regarding the car's original clutch and its suitability for long drives, respectively, to which @LeFauch confidently reassured potential buyers about the car's readiness for a road trip. Information about the car's horsepower and throttle response was also discussed, with @LeFauch reporting a significant boost in performance from the VelocityAP tune and modifications.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the durability of the seat leather, with @Carnut4ever expressing surprise over its tendency to bunch despite the car being a handmade piece of craftsmanship. @Speedraser explained that the issue stemmed from the environmentally friendly padding used in the seats rather than the high-quality leather itself. @Jmartora inquired about the specifics of the seat upholstery wear and potential costs for repairs, which @LeFauch acknowledged by explaining how the padding under the leather has worn over time, requiring potential fixes for an accurate appearance.
|
 |
Positive: @amotorsports (The Seller) has shared a detailed account of their pride in the 1985 GMC Pickup, boasting significant upgrades including a full repaint in pearl blue, new leather interiors, and an advanced sound system with Bluetooth capabilities. Commentors like @boaboyoz and @DUGEEEFRESH04 have praised the truck's aesthetics, with @Banksonit709 acknowledging its stunning color and inquiring about specific modifications, while @Beans_Bacon simply remarked, "Sweet." The conversations highlight the truck's charm and the seller’s commitment to maintaining its classic feel while incorporating modern comforts.
Neutral: Various commentors expressed curiosity about technical aspects of the vehicle. @Banksonit709 raised questions regarding the speedometer's gearing with the new larger tires and how easy it would be to remove the lift kit. @PSFarm shared thoughts about how the truck's wheel/tire combination would benefit from being closer to the ground, which sparked a discussion on the height of the vehicle compared to standard 2WD trucks. @amotorsports (The Seller) responded directly to these inquiries, emphasizing that the truck maintains the original engine and transmission while also noting the possibility of lowering the vehicle if desired.
Negative: Some users voiced strong opinions against the lift and wheel modifications, suggesting they detracted from the truck's appeal. @Banksonit709 expressed a personal preference for a lower stance and commented that the extreme lift was undesirable for a two-wheel-drive truck. Similarly, @PSFarm and others echoed this sentiment, stating they would prefer the truck with reduced height for better aesthetics. @amotorsports (The Seller) defended their design choices, asserting the bodywork and upgrades are professionally backed, and underscored that the truck's unique look is part of its charm, though it was clear not everyone shared this appreciation.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its aesthetics, with @Tom_S. describing it as 'smart looking' and 'very nice.' @GLWA,Scott noted that it's rarely seen such a well-preserved TC, suggesting it would be a hit at car meets. @MNberg emphasized its beautiful interior, especially the artistic dash, and shared fond memories of TCs, noting their role in introducing sports cars to the U.S. after the war. The seller, @Sierra_Classic_Sportscar, expressed enthusiasm about the car, claiming it gets down the road well and has a fun driving experience, further solidifying its appeal.
Neutral: Several comments raised questions about the car's specifications and restoration such as @DetrahoTectum, who inquired about the originality of the color scheme, while @agingengineer asked if the tub wood had been replaced during restoration. The seller clarified the vehicle's history and the features it retains, including the striking paint combination that, while not factory-standard, resembles popular periods styles. Additionally, @morganplus8 pointed out various design aspects and modifications that have taken place over the years. The exchange showcases a blend of admiration and curiosity among potential buyers and enthusiasts.
Negative: There were few negative comments; however, @Dugue pointed out an apparent slip from the seller when discussing the vehicle's British origin, implying a miscommunication that could confuse potential buyers. @MGB6 questioned whether the removed EXU parts would be included, hinting at a concern for completeness or authenticity. Other comments, while not overtly negative, suggested dissatisfaction with the current paint color, with @MNberg and @morganplus8 expressing a desire to repaint portions of the car for aesthetic coherence, specifically suggesting that black might complement the car's features better than yellow.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received enthusiastic feedback from commenters, highlighting its impressive features and unique color. @Hogbud expressed admiration, stating it is 'very impressive', while @charron98 praised the 'Chalk and black' spec as a great choice. Furthermore, @Wob (The Seller) shared appreciation for the vehicle's unique appeal, stating their love for the car's color and driving capabilities, describing it as 'loads of fun to drive while being very pragmatic'. The positive remarks reflect a strong interest in the vehicle’s aesthetics and performance.
Neutral: In addition to the praise, there are informative exchanges regarding the auction process and vehicle specifics. @RA_SA inquired about the availability of the window sticker and service history, showcasing typical buyer curiosity. @Wob (The Seller) provided extensive details about the auction, encouraging potential bidders to prepare by reviewing their comments and frequently asked questions. They emphasized the importance of transparency by mentioning the addition of further photos and videos as the auction proceeds, thus ensuring bidders can make informed decisions.
Negative: Conversely, there are concerns over potential misunderstandings in the bidding and buying process, as indicated by @Wob (The Seller). They cautioned against participating without pre-approved funds and stressed the importance of genuine intentions in bidding. Issues regarding the accuracy of the Carfax reports and the reliability of vehicle history were also noted, indicating that bidders should exercise due diligence and not rely solely on such reports. This illustrates that while there is excitement surrounding the vehicle, potential buyers should proceed with caution.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally appreciate the vehicle’s performance and aesthetics. @Siowner notes that the car boasts top performance and is in great condition with low mileage and all the top options. @theforce88 expresses admiration by calling it a beautiful car, and @mikeroten finds the rear 3/4 view particularly nice for a modern BMW. Additionally, @CMEklund (The Seller) informs potential buyers about the overall condition of the tires after a professional inspection, emphasizing that there were no blemishes or screws found, and that he plans to replace the rear tires soon.
Neutral: There are several requests for more information about the vehicle, showing interest in specific details. @MK617 asks about the tread life on the tires, while @maverickster inquires about the warranty duration and a potential warning signal indicated by a red triangle on the dashboard. @CMEklund (The Seller) provides answers to these questions, explaining the warranty coverage and clarifying that the vibration noise in the driving video is due to transitioning from gravel to blacktop, and that the red light on the dash pertains to the hazard button being activated.
Negative: Some comments reflect a negative view, focusing on aspects of the vehicle's appearance and potential issues. @BKC4242 points out that it seems like the rear driver’s side tire may have picked up a screw, while @LongDucDong humorously comments that the car has 'the face only a mother could love,' suggesting a strong dislike for the car's design. @maverickster raises concerns about a noise heard in the driving video, which may indicate a problem, reflecting apprehension about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @good-design shared a sentiment of nostalgia, indicating that they owned the vehicle in the past and often miss it, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @knowthybeast expressed enthusiasm regarding specific engine components, appreciating their presence on the vehicle and recognizing their significance. @DucVT reminisced about their own experience with a similar model, contributing information about piston configurations and offering a friendly 'good luck with the auction' message.
Neutral: @Windsurferie (The Seller) responded to various inquiries, explaining the complexities involved with the car's low compression issue and acknowledging the necessity for possible engine disassembly. They confirmed that a large dual seat and six-gallon fuel tank were not included with the sale, while also noting their availability for contact up until July 29 for potential bidders. The seller included details about the painting process of the vehicle components and shared a sense of transparency regarding costs associated with restoration efforts.
Negative: @Tpetty raised a concern about the low compression in a rebuilt engine, questioning whether it might be due to issues with the valves rather than the piston rings. @Fasting suggested the possibility of incorrect pistons being used during the rebuild, referencing their similar experiences with car restoration. @StaffordRestorations questioned the affordability of the painting job, hinting at skepticism about low material costs involved.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the well-maintained condition of the 1973 Airstream International Land Yacht Ambassador, with @motoexoticastl (The Seller) providing detailed videos showcasing that all systems are functioning well, including the stove. The recent polishing job has left the aluminum with a nice luster, dispelling concerns about fading or burns from over-polishing, as noted by @tastaairstream. The seller also assures potential buyers that they are available to assist with shipping and any questions about the trailer's features, welcoming first-time bidders and creating an engaging, friendly atmosphere.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about specific details regarding the vehicle, such as the weight and the configuration of water tanks. @2good2btrue asked about the tow weight, while @DPFaust sought to understand the vehicle's requirements for towing. @Silverbullit raised questions about the operation of various systems including waterlines and brakes, showing a continued interest in the Airstream's practicality for potential owners. These inquiries reflect the community's desire for clarity about the trailer's operational aspects.
Negative: Concerns about the title were raised by @CactusVince, questioning whether the "Corrected/Duplicate" title could complicate registration in other states. This sentiment reflects a caution regarding potential administrative issues buyers may face. Additionally, there were discussions about possible leaks, which @Silverbullit wanted confirmation on, indicating some hesitancy about the trailer's condition despite the seller's reassurances. Overall, while the comments indicate interest, there are underlying apprehensions that prospective buyers have regarding regulatory and functional aspects.
|
 |
Positive: @MaxaMillyfromPhilly, the seller, has been quite responsive to inquiries and concerns about the vehicle, indicating his commitment to transparency. He provided detailed updates, including images and videos of the dashboard, pinch welds, and the wooden spare tire cover. Positive feedback included notes from @Sil_80 appreciating the responsiveness and additional information provided by the seller.
Neutral: @Ccast33 raised valid concerns regarding engine performance, specifically asking if the vehicle has check engine lights or sounds like it has a misfire. Similarly, @AlpineE34M5 inquired about the digital speedometer and engine mount vibrations without indicating a definite positive or negative sentiment. @96NSXTJVA expressed nostalgia for a similar model while seeking confirmation about the rear spoiler's removal, showing interest in the car without clear judgment.
Negative: There were concerns regarding the vehicle's odometer reading, with @enthuziast questioning the accuracy of the mileage compared to previous reports, suggesting the odometer might not be functioning correctly. @AlpineE34M5 echoed this sentiment, indicating a possible discrepancy if the speedometer had stopped working. The seller, however, tried to clarify this matter by attributing the differences to a historical inspection report without adequately assuaging all concerns.
|
Single-Family-Owned 10k-Mile 2003 Harley-Davidson Night Train 100th Anniversary
1HD1BTY143Y039482
Lot 201670
Private Party
 |
Positive: @KALIB1990 (The Seller) presents this 100th Anniversary Night Train as a meticulously maintained scooter that has been in his family for 23 years. The seller expresses pride in the bike and mentions that all service was performed at a Harley Davidson dealer, ensuring professional care. Commenters like @Dondixon share their enthusiasm, reminiscing about the fun they've had with similar motorcycles, while others appreciate the bike's tasteful modifications and elegant appearance.
Neutral: The comments touch upon practical questions regarding the bike's history and specifications. @HDWalt asks about the tires, and @pazecar inquires about the engine heads, indicating an interest in the bike's condition. @Jimm1900 seeks shipping options, showing that potential buyers are considering logistics if they choose to bid. @Picohill confirms the stock carburetor and engages in conversation about technical specifications, indicating that there is a collaborative spirit among the commenters.
Negative: Some comments hint at minor concerns, such as the age of the bike's tires as @KALIB1990 mentions they were last replaced in 2007, which raises questions about safety for potential buyers. @pazecar's inquiry about the stock heads also identifies a potential gap in performance expectations, as he notes that they don't appear to have been upgraded. Overall, while there are some transactional questions that could imply hesitation, the overall sentiment remains largely positive.
|
 |
Positive: @jcruss69 mentioned that the truck body was refinished in green and that the camper shell was repaired and updated, showcasing a commitment to maintaining the vehicle's aesthetic. @Hackberry praised the camper as an awesome vehicle, complimenting the seller for their effort in restoring it. Multiple comments, such as those from @goatgoatgoat and @Undertaker, highlighted the rig’s nostalgic appeal, with @goatgoatgoat expressing excitement about the memories associated with it, while others expressed a desire to own and use the vehicle.
Neutral: @gkt (The Seller) clarified a miscommunication regarding the stripes being described as green instead of gold. They also explained that the circular gauge in the vehicle is an RV leveling gauge, which some commenters were curious about. @KawaZmoto provided historical context on the Mitchell Camper, noting its quality construction, while also mentioning the need for regular maintenance to ensure longevity.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, there were concerns raised about some minor issues, such as the duct tape covering damage on the wall that @gkt (The Seller) addressed. There seemed to be varying perceptions about the color and appearance of the truck in comments, with some users finding discrepancies in descriptions. @grumpy2020 and other users’ humor about unique aspects like the duct tape and the linoleum hints at some skepticism about the care taken in certain areas of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Wgris commented on the car's attractiveness, describing it as a 'pretty car'. @Nextquestion expressed love for the model, sharing their positive experience with a similar vehicle highlighting its reliable performance and quality improvements. @swordfishtrombone praised the vehicle's aesthetics and recommended clearer photography to show off its appeal. @Scottedwards3 and @Modern68 both requested additional images and videos to get better insights into the vehicle's condition, indicating an overall interest in its details.
Neutral: @Stunt_Road (The Seller) welcomed questions and shared information about the vehicle's features, stating that the drive is smooth and the look is elegant. The seller responded to inquiries about the headliner and provided updates, such as posting startup and drive-off videos as well as answering questions about paint condition and service records. The seller also indicated that while the trunk showed some light fading, the other panels were in glossy condition, and all service records were available for review.
Negative: @Wgris raised concerns about potential leaks and the condition of the seats, which the seller addressed by confirming there were no issues with drips or seepage, and that the seats are original. @Modern68 asked for specific details regarding paint fading and service records, implying a need for thorough transparency in the vehicle's condition. @zembala inquired about the presence of a boot cover for the convertible top, only to find out that it was not included, which could be a downside for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiastic appreciation for the vehicle, noting its unique build and artistic flair. @newcarpro and @spdjunior praised the creativity and craftsmanship, with @newcarpro specifically highlighting the car's asymmetrical design and overall aesthetic appeal. Many, including @broodie and @57charlie, referred to the vehicle as a work of art that embodies a fun, visionary approach, with @BigRedRivi calling it 'Way Kool!' Several commenters remarked on the car's distinctive style, suggesting it captures a whimsical and imaginative spirit, with @G2Z excited about its appearance in Forza Horizon.
Neutral: Some comments provided factual insights or constructive critiques about the vehicle without leaning too positively or negatively. @pauljurewicz (The Seller) clarified aspects of the car's construction, mentioning that it was built from a 1957 Studebaker Golden Hawk and confirming its street legality. @stage03 raised a question about a practical detail regarding the gas cap's tape, and @ridleysrides inquired about the car's origins, showcasing an interest in its history. @Y2K911 discussed design aspects and indicated there were opinions on the relevance of some photo displays, hinting at a desire for more dynamic presentation.
Negative: Despite the overall admiration, some commenters expressed skepticism or bemusement regarding the vehicle. @Y2K911 criticized the photo presentation, calling it the 'most redundant display of photos,' while @Al_Swearengen voiced confusion about the car's appearance, questioning what he was actually looking at. Additionally, @bringatrailer and @dagmar82 provided critical feedback, with @dagmar82 framing it as a 'nightmare' for those from South Bend, suggesting there are polarized views on the car's design. @onedaysomeday humorously remarked it resembled 'Tow Mater as a sports car,' highlighting mismatched aesthetics.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the appeal of the 2009 Audi B8 A4 Quattro, with @aegmotorsports detailing its impressive features such as a 2.0L Turbo-Charged engine that produces 211 hp and 258 lb-ft of torque. The inclusion of luxury items like heated front seats, dual-zone climate control, and premium sound systems enhances its desirability. Additionally, it comes equipped with valuable items such as two key fobs, factory literature, and a reproduction window sticker, making it an attractive selection for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several participants express specific inquiries and comments regarding the model year of the vehicle. @Uby67vw1958 raises a relevant question about the timing mechanism of the engine, and @aegmotorsports promptly clarifies that the 2009 A4 uses a timing chain rather than a belt, which is an important detail for potential buyers regarding maintenance. @nmoreno0306 also shares personal experiences that underscore common confusions between model generations, indicating that the marketplace has many variations that can be confusing for sellers and buyers alike.
Negative: On the downside, some comments indicate potential confusion among buyers regarding the different generations of the Audi A4. @nmoreno0306 shares their experience with confusion during servicing, suggesting that the model year distinctions could lead to miscommunication or mistakes if handled by technicians unfamiliar with the variations. This concern may deter some buyers who require certain assurances regarding service and maintenance compatibility.
|
 |
Positive: @BigRedRivi expresses enthusiasm about the barn doors of the vehicle, highlighting it as a feature he fondly misses from his previous Tahoe. He indicates that if circumstances were different, he would seriously consider purchasing this vehicle, especially given the appealing 'resale red' color. This suggests that he has a favorable opinion of the vehicle's design and color.
Neutral: @nomogates raises practical questions regarding the vehicle's functionality, specifically inquiring about the operability of the electronics, windows, and seat heaters, as well as any known engine or transmission issues. He indicates a concern about the feasibility of driving the vehicle 400 miles home. @Hollyview (The Seller) responds, reassuring @nomogates that there are no issues with the vehicle's functionality, apart from the air conditioning, which hasn't been checked yet. He confirms that all other parts are working fine, making it suitable for a long drive.
Negative: @BigEB asks @seller for confirmation on the status of the air conditioning, questioning whether it is functioning and blowing cold air, and if there are any known leaks. This inquiry indicates some uncertainty and concern about the vehicle’s condition, particularly focusing on the air conditioning system, which is essential for comfort during travel.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors like @GDogg praised the 2023 Escalade V Series as an "absolutely fantastic" offering, highlighting its exceptional features and allure. @Fbalsamo100 (The Seller) expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as a "beautiful truck with lots of power" that deserves to be driven and enjoyed. Another comment by @AZSkye reflected a desire to acquire the Escalade V, noting that while it remains somewhat expensive, prices are beginning to decrease, indicating growing interest in the model at potentially more accessible price points.
Neutral: Some comments raised inquiries about operational aspects and features of the vehicle, exemplified by @SRT2008, who asked about the freezer's capabilities and the gas tank size. @Texas_fortune requested clarification on the outstanding lien related to the vehicle, emphasizing the importance of transparency regarding costs associated with the auction. @CarArt2021's question about the reasons for selling the Escalade reflects curiosity about the seller's perspective on the vehicle's performance and suitability.
Negative: @RJAPPRAISE negatively critiqued the vehicle's aesthetics, specifically calling out the wheels as "hideous" and suggesting alternative designs would enhance its appearance. Additionally, @BabyD69 raised concerns about reliability by questioning whether there had been engine failures in the model year, hinting at potential apprehensions regarding the vehicle's performance. @AZSkye jokingly referenced the sudden intensity of comments with a play on words related to the Escalade, signaling skepticism about the vehicle's acclaim.
|
Azzurro Thetys Metallic 2022 Porsche 911 GT3 Touring 6-Speed
WP0AC2A9XNS270367
Lot 201747
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commenters universally praised the stunning aesthetics of the Porsche GT3 Touring, emphasizing its exquisite 'Azzuro Thetys' color which was described as "gorgeous" and "absolutely stunning." Many noted the impressive quality of the interior re-trim done by Exclusive Options, likening it even more favorably than factory options, showcasing a high standard of craftsmanship. @K-Nut (The Seller) received commendations for the meticulous care of the vehicle, including a full PPF and ceramic coat, and comments highlighted that the owner had openly shared detailed insights about the car's history and maintenance, which garnered trust and excitement among potential buyers.
Neutral: Many commenters showed interest in additional details and documentation, like the DME report and photographs of specific features such as the underseat leather treatment. @K-Nut (The Seller) engaged with these inquiries, promising to provide the requested information, including the papers for the interior work. Several participants expressed anticipation for more outdoor photos to better capture the car's color in sunlight, reflecting a general eagerness to see a fuller representation of the vehicle's beauty before making final decisions in the auction.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming enthusiasm, a few commenters expressed skepticism or frustration regarding the auction process. @rabpgh1 humorously demanded extensive documentation, while others displayed impatience over the rapid escalation of bids. Additionally, @Lubehead raised a point of contention about the absence of a Burmester sound system in a vehicle of such high value, emphasizing personal preferences that could affect potential buyers. These comments, while less frequent, indicate some concerns amid the overall positive reception.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciated the vehicle's appearance and driving quality. @archinoob called it a 'nice looking car,' while @Olliem noted it was a 'wonderful driver, in nearly perfect condition, and runs flawlessly.' This sentiment was echoed by @gmtbend, who referred to the car as 'awesome' and praised its 'high build quality, longevity, and driving reward.' Additionally, @thorpej expressed excitement for whoever would purchase the car, highlighting it as a 'great' choice.
Neutral: In terms of specifics, there was some discussion about the car's marketing as a 'sport wagon' and terminology surrounding its features. @solarfish pointed out that BMW referred to the 3er Touring as a Sport Wagon regardless of the sports package, while @Polo40 and @fritz02 asked about the mechanical and structural condition of the car as well as confirmed details like the rear seat folding flat. @mmartin (The Seller) addressed these inquiries by providing details on the car's mechanical condition, stating that it has no significant issues but has minor cosmetic flaws, and confirmed it has passed smog testing.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's past performance and certain cosmetic aspects. @Polo40 and others inquired about potential mechanical issues and the vehicle’s history, including why it failed California emissions tests Previously. @fritz02 specifically questioned the emissions performance, indicating some doubt about reliability. Additionally, while most comments were positive, the mention of cosmetic issues like dents and a scuff mark raised some flags for potential buyers, as noted by @mmartin (The Seller) who acknowledged these imperfections in the listing.
|
 |
Positive: @LDwight (The Seller) describes the 2009 Solstice Coupe GXP as a beautiful sports car, which he enjoys driving on nice days. He highlights the performance characteristics, especially with the Borg Warner turbo upgrade that enhances its powerband, making it a thrilling experience for its driver. He also mentions that he has taken great care of the car, keeping it in excellent condition for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters, such as @Just_me and @SolRide, express curiosity regarding the vehicle's features and accessories, like the soft top option and the car's sale after a relatively short ownership period. @mrred7 inquires about paperwork related to a stage 3 upgrade, while @FoMoCoBOB shows interest in a video of the car's exhaust notes. @Car6on14 asks if the vehicle is available for US buyers and for potential shipping arrangements.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding rust on the rotors and undercarriage as noted by @ATNATS. This commenter questions the potential for rust issues and the overall treatment of the car in winter weather. @Danno23 asks for clarification on a dented front bumper, suggesting that certain maintenance aspects of the vehicle may require further inspection to assure potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters have expressed enthusiasm for the car, referring to it as a "timeless" classic and praising its aesthetics. @Pete000 noted the appeal of the model, and @Damaho912 remarked that it looks much better compared to typical project cars seen on the platform. @DRIVEGUY highlighted the early high bidding as a positive indicator, and @iankarr emphasized the value of the vehicle as a great platform for restoration given the encouraging compression numbers. Overall, the consensus is that there is potential in this 1970 Porsche 914-6 to be brought back to life with some work.
Neutral: Many comments reflect a state of caution or curiosity regarding the car's condition. @Haddonman and @milage pointed out concerns about the rust and damage, suggesting a need for thorough inspections, especially in critical areas like the rocker covers and around the VIN plate. The seller, @GriotsMotors, provided answers to these concerns and further shared details about the car's storage and its lack of running condition since 2016. @Poromeo and @seinsmeld13 requested additional photos and videos to better assess the vehicle, indicating that while they are interested, they seek more information to make an informed decision.
Negative: Comments on the car also revealed significant concerns regarding its current condition. @sixxpack and @rlaverty mentioned evidence of previous damage, noting that the car appears to have been struck in the front and suggesting extensive repairs would be necessary. @iankarr warned that restoring the vehicle to top condition would require considerable work due to structural issues, rust, and past accidents, which may deter potential buyers. Several individuals highlighted the risks involved in purchasing a project car like this one, indicating mixed feelings about bidding given its state and the potential costs involved in restoration.
|
 |
Positive: @mike_rockwell appreciates the interesting slant-back old/new build combination of the vehicle, highlighting its nice chop and good drivetrain. They suggest making some detailed completions, such as adding a headliner and changing the white walls for a better aesthetic.
Neutral: @Ski-Doer inquires about the type of 4-speed transmission the vehicle has, showing interest in its specifications. @13steve (The Seller) responds by confirming that the transmission is a 4L60E and the engine is an LQ4, providing further information to potential buyers.
Negative: @De3de8 points out that the vehicle needs its front bumper, indicating an aspect that requires attention and might deter some buyers. @13steve (The Seller) acknowledges this, admitting that the previous owner did not put it on.
|
Ex–Bill Harrah, 253-Mile 1966 Studebaker Commander 4-Door Sedan 3-Speed
C134292
Lot 201693
Private Party
 |
Positive: @RadialSkid describes the vehicle as beautiful and original, and @Desierto praises it as a gem with phenomenal documentation, noting specific features like the flow-through ventilation. @mbstude (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm in introducing the car and highlights the extensive documentation from its time at Harrah's. Commenters like @Dollycat3 and @whiterock add to the admiration, with @Dollycat3 calling it 'absolutely plum beautiful' and @whiterock sharing a personal connection by mentioning a similar model they own.
Neutral: Several comments provide historical context, with @AMcM explaining that by 1965 Studebaker was using Chevy engines. @CarFoolLane shares a nostalgic connection to a 1966 Studebaker owned by actress Frances Bavier. Meanwhile, @mbstude (The Seller) and @Cperez7201 engage in a conversation about the car's past ownership and the journey it has taken to reach the auction stage, emphasizing its significance within the Studebaker community and the importance of preserving its story.
Negative: There are some tensions in the comments, particularly involving @knuckdave, who has been accused of trolling and making unsubstantiated claims about the car having flood damage, which @mbstude (The Seller) strongly denies. @Starlight50 and others highlight the importance of honesty in auction listings, critiquing @knuckdave's behavior as damaging to trust within the community. Such disputes bring a cloud of negativity to the otherwise enthusiastic discussion surrounding the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @RScollection has received positive feedback for presenting a very nice, super clean G500 that runs and drives great. Commenters have expressed appreciation for the vehicle's condition, with @willchao noting how rare it is to find a clean W463 in colors other than black and @Cruiser80 calling it one of the best G500s in a while. Comments like those from @Mido highlight that the vehicle presents well both in photos and in person, emphasizing its well-maintained state and original paint quality.
Neutral: Several commenters have asked for clarifications on maintenance records and service history, indicating a general concern about the lack of detailed documentation since 2013. @tvanbenten mentioned a worry regarding cheap tires potentially reflecting neglect in routine upkeep, while @Groovemist pointed out the infrequency of recorded services. Nevertheless, @RScollection assured potential buyers that the vehicle has undergone a complete inspection and has no issues, while also agreeing to provide service documentation and more videos as requested.
Negative: Concerns were raised by various commenters regarding certain aspects of the G500's maintenance and condition. @EMW echoed @tvanbenten's sentiment about the implications of installing cheap tires on a premium vehicle, stressing the importance of maintenance records. Additionally, @Cruiser80 and @Markchelak expressed skepticism regarding the use of the lockers and their functionality, with @Markchelak requesting further testing and documentation of the vehicle's condition, suggesting that the perceived absence of past locker engagement could indicate potential costly repairs in the future.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its stunning aesthetics, particularly praising its color and overall condition. @EddieNap and @1967Shelby both remarked on the beauty of the car, with @S197Pony expressing admiration for it being one of their dream cars. @boaboyoz called it a drop-dead gorgeous specimen, while other commenters like @Expresswasher applauded the quality of the photos presented, reinforcing the vehicle's appeal as a rare classic. The seller, @CompassCollective, also emphasized the car's impressive refurbishment and encouraged potential bidders to view it in person, showcasing confidence in its condition.
Neutral: Several comments noted technical details and historical context regarding the vehicle's specifications. @wwilson511 and @Journeymanlineman both asked about the differences between models, indicating a level of inquiry from novice and experienced enthusiasts alike. @Coralsnake contributed information on production changes between the 1969 and 1970 models, while @Gopher428 mentioned the prevalence of automatic transmissions in these models. Discussion also revolved around the car's restoration, with @CompassCollective mentioning that the engine is believed to be original and has not been rebuilt, alongside various opinions about the added rear spoiler.
Negative: While many comments were positive or neutral, there were critiques regarding certain modifications to the vehicle. @Journeymanlineman and @zbgy1 expressed their disapproval of the rear spoiler, stating it detracted from the car's aesthetics. @Dwait raised concerns about the technical details of the vehicle, while @oldcanuck and others pointed out inconsistencies regarding the car's production history and the implications of its VIN changes. Additionally, there were questions about the integrity of specific parts of the car, such as the center vent and the condition of the trunk lid, indicating that some viewers harbored doubts about its restoration quality.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciate the overall condition of the 1981 FJ45, praising it as a 'survivor' and noting its rust-free status. Many are impressed with the factory rivets still being visible, suggesting that the vehicle has retained its authenticity. The description of the drivetrain being in perfect condition and the recent addition of a new starter have also garnered positive feedback, with potential buyers expressing confidence in the reliability and performance of the truck.
Neutral: Some comments reflect a neutral stance, acknowledging the appeal of the truck but also highlighting the need for more detailed information, such as the specific mileage and any potential maintenance history. A few commenters noted the lack of detailed images that could showcase the truck's features more clearly, suggesting that while they find the truck interesting, they want more reassurance before considering a purchase.
Negative: On the negative side, there were concerns from a few commenters regarding the repainting of the vehicle, with some questioning whether any underlying issues might be hidden beneath the new paint. Additionally, a couple of individuals expressed disappointment at the lack of customization options available, particularly for those looking to modify or restore the truck further. Overall, while the comments reveal a strong interest in the FJ45, some reservations were also noted.
|
 |
Positive: @ekotysh described the vehicle as a nice, clean SL Spyder example, referring to it as a beautiful time capsule that looks brand new. @trusted_one expressed satisfaction over the vehicle's automatic transmission, stating it would work fine for him given his physical issues and praised the low mileage, comparing it favorably with the price of new convertibles in today’s market. The seller, @Jofpbj, reassured potential buyers about the vehicle’s condition, stating it is as clean as it looks and detailing its history from the original owner, contributing to its appeal as a well-kept car.
Neutral: @TimV64 provided a comparison between the vehicle type and a VR4 model, suggesting there was no contest in performance between the two. @EvansInvestments17 brought up features of the VR4, such as all-wheel drive and four-wheel steering, contributing to the conversation about performance differences. The seller, @Jofpbj, addressed inquiries about the car's functionality and features, indicating that everything was operational and verifying the vehicle isn't a VR4 as some inquiries suggested.
Negative: @WX8 questioned why the vehicle was being compared to the VR4, implying that the two cars are not in the same league. @Rynohd raised concerns about the clarity of the listing, asking for confirmation whether there were any operational issues and expressing frustration over the lack of responses to previous inquiries. @Mustang15 also sought clarification regarding the functionality of specific options, indicating some uncertainty about the car’s condition and raising points about potential missing information.
|
 |
Positive: @packardv8 expresses a strong fondness for these cars, describing them as timeless and among their favorite weekenders. They appreciate the M104 engine's characteristics despite its known head gasket issues, stating that they are wonderful and revy engines. @DLL58 and @rickadams100 both confirm that this vehicle is indeed a 3.0 M104, emphasizing the horsepower rating of 217 for the North American market and negating concerns over biodegradable wiring harness issues in this model, suggesting there is confidence in the car's specifications and performance.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle's history and maintenance indicate a mix of factual clarifications and operational considerations. @rickadams100 (The Seller) has addressed concerns over the vehicle's vibration issue, noting that wheel bearings could be a potential concern and it might be a tire or wheel problem. @Janos_z raises a valid point about the headlights being swapped for post-facelift versions, prompting speculation about the car's past but no definitive evidence of accidents, which leads to an overall neutral portrayal of the vehicle's aesthetics and modifications. Maintenance queries revolve around head gasket replacements, suggesting they were commonly addressed at low mileage, with @MR67 sharing personal experience confirming this trend.
Negative: Concerns emerged regarding the vehicle's reliability, particularly surrounding the head gasket and wheel bearings. @sancem questioned the necessity of a head gasket replacement at only 30k miles, indicating skepticism about excessive maintenance needs. @QueenElizabeth3 commented on the vehicle's exterior condition, suggesting it may not have been well cared for, implying possible neglect. Additionally, @crownstooge pointed out potential discrepancies in engine specifications, leaving room for doubt regarding the car's history. Overall, several comments reflect apprehensions about the true condition of this aging vehicle and whether it may require significant future repairs.
|
12k-Mile 2004 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Commemorative Edition
1G1YY12S145124053
Lot 201642
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, highlighting its performance and iconic status within the Corvette community. @digicoffee expressed their love for the C5, calling it 'the best C5 you can get.' @getyourfreakon noted that it is a true enthusiast's sports car, bringing joy every time they drive it. @AJTRAILLE shared their experience of owning a similar vehicle, emphasizing its versatility and thrilling performance. The importance of the C5 Z06's historical significance was emphasized by @fiveomar, who discussed its achievements in terms of lightweight construction and racing success, making it a collectible asset.
Neutral: Various questions about the vehicle's condition and specifications were raised by commenters. @Mark6p inquired about maintenance records and the comfort of a long drive home, while @RVBeard sought details about the PPF and ceramic coating, as well as the status of tires and brakes. The seller, @jhutch33, addressed these inquiries, confirming that all tires were replaced and that the car has no issues with brakes or paint. Additionally, there were discussions about the original and updated stereo systems, with opinions on their value and the ease of reverting to stock.
Negative: There were some mixed reviews and inquiries that hinted at potential concerns. @ktdevine21 questioned the quick sale of the vehicle, wondering why the seller was parting with it so soon after purchase. The remarks indicated a level of skepticism regarding the car's mileage history and title status, which the seller did address by confirming actual miles and the relevant title information. Additionally, commenters, such as @ShortySMC and @B206L4, discussed the lock-out switch feature in relation to the Z06, providing insights that suggest this aspect could be a consideration for potential buyers.
|
|
|