Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters praised the 1989 Porsche 944 Turbo for its impressive condition and performance. @ZigMeister60 noted this car is a high benchmark within its category, while @asm283 echoed that its amazing shape makes it almost too good to drive. @Cultvines shared fond memories of a similar model, emphasizing its deceptive speed and excellent handling. @GarageEnvy complimented the seller, @casciomotors, for restoring the car to outstanding condition. @Jusaur, who has driven the car, confirmed its pristine state, with excellent features including cold A/C and normal gauge levels. Overall, the comments highlighted the car's appeal and the work put into maintaining it.
Neutral: Several commenters addressed the car's features and specifications, mentioning that high-powered 951 models are often equipped with desirable options like sport seats, although not all prefer them. @ralleyquattro discussed this optioning, while @pjza posed questions regarding the car's history, including inquiries about the last timing belt replacement and possible leaks. @casciomotors provided detailed responses about the car's maintenance records totaling over $35,000, underscoring the thorough care it has received. Additionally, comments touched on the car's aesthetic appeal, such as color combinations and body presentation.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about the car's maintenance history despite the extensive records provided by @casciomotors. @pjza seemed unsure about the clarity of the paint meter readings presented in the gallery, and @dshcay inquired about potential fluid leaks and the car's smog compliance in California. These questions highlighted some potential hesitations from potential buyers regarding the car's past and readiness for future use. However, overall, the consensus was that these concerns did not overshadow the car's impressive attributes.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the stunning and beautiful Ferrari 365 GT 2+2, with many users expressing their admiration for its exquisite design and elegance. @cardude76 refers to it as an 'absolute beauty', while @Dollycat3 describes it as 'stunning, sleek, sexy, gorgeous'. @alfriedesq even goes as far as calling it a 'time machine', showcasing how this vehicle holds a sense of nostalgia and allure for the commenters. Additionally, @GDogg complements the car's magnificent dark blue color, expressing a sense of excitement around the auction with phrases like 'bellissima' and 'sensational'.
Neutral: Several comments focus on inquiries and clarifications regarding the Ferrari's features, maintenance history, and auction details. @GREEKMBA asks for information about the air conditioning functionality, certification booklet, tool kit, and current repair needs, showing a keen interest in the car's condition. @drlincoln requests a compression check, while @Cazna questions the red light shown in the video. In contrast, @oldcanuck inquires about the car's delivery history, demonstrating a focus on provenance and authenticity. These comments highlight the practicality and diligence of potential buyers researching before participating in the auction.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, there are some reservations expressed by commenters regarding certain aspects of the vehicle. @Gdaddy raises a concern about the reconditioning of the leather seats, asking for specific details on the extent of the work done. Furthermore, @Bobsuouruncle laments that the non-functional 8-track player is a dealbreaker for them. @Vizsla notes that while the car is lovely, it might require attention to old suspension bushings, indicating some areas might need work. These comments illustrate cautiousness among potential buyers about the car's condition, showing the importance of transparency in the auction process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the stunning design and restoration quality of the Lancia Stratos HF Stradale. @boaboyoz describes it as an extraordinary and cool vehicle, calling it the coolest on Bring A Trailer. @Bill_Noon reflects on the joy of driving this car, reminiscing about the delight it brings on the road. Enthusiasts like @professorgearhead express a deep yearning for ownership, with others noting the car's iconic status and unique charm. The restoration has garnered praise for focusing on originality and authenticity, including the extensive mechanical work documented by @GriotsMotors, ensuring the car is not only visually stunning but also a robust performer.
Neutral: Several commenters appreciate the car's rarity and the thoroughness of the restoration. @mynameistimo pointed out that this is an exceptionally rare listing for Bring A Trailer, emphasizing its uniqueness compared to other high-value cars. Some discuss their personal experiences with the Stratos or its replicas, like @ABikePeddler, who gives insights into their driving experiences in a Stratos tribute car. There are suggestions about the car's market history and technical specifications, such as discussions around headlight brands and engine performance, reflecting a mix of information sharing and personal anecdotes.
Negative: Critiques focus on the originality concerns raised by some, with @Nis1973 and @ThomasPOPPER noting discrepancies in restoration details, such as the absence of a fuel pump switch and the wrong headlights. Others express frustration at the price and the impracticality of owning such a vehicle, like @BigRedRivi, who wishes they could afford it but finds the financial barrier daunting. @GriotsMotors addresses these criticisms, highlighting their commitment to restoring authenticity while satisfying aesthetic preferences. There’s a sense of skepticism about whether the restoration fully respects the car's original specifications, as raised by various commenters.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the Ranchero as a lovely sight, noting its blue and white color scheme and calling it a wonderful example of its kind, wishing good luck to the seller. Another positive aspect is @Warrenlu highlighting the vehicle's features such as the factory steel dash and a well-equipped C6 transmission, indicating the attention to detail in the modifications made to enhance performance, including a mild RV cam and upgraded exhaust ports.
Neutral: @Warrenlu introduces the vehicle as part of a collection and outlines a schedule for listing additional models, providing potential buyers with a context for the Ranchero among other classic cars. Commenters engage with the seller discussing technical specifications about the engine and dashboard, with corrections made about the vehicle's engine lineage and discuss different engine types. The mention of the rear end ratio by @Warrenlu adds another layer of information that may be of interest to potential buyers.
Negative: @DClary and @gocorcoran point out discrepancies regarding the engine specifications, with @DClary noting that the 351 Cleveland ceased production in 1974 and suggesting that the vehicle's engine is a 351M, rather than a 351C as initially claimed by the seller. This brings into question the accuracy of the vehicle's description, causing confusion regarding its historical engine context and casting doubt on the seller's statements. Overall, some commenters expressed skepticism about the claimed engine and modifications, indicating a potential issue with the trustworthiness of the information provided.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @davidb72 commented on the vehicle's beautiful color, indicating a strong appreciation for its aesthetics. @Collectibleclassics, the seller, emphasized their commitment to transparency in transactions and praised the uniqueness of their vehicle offerings. Their approach to listings focuses on thorough photography and detailed walkthrough videos to showcase any minor cosmetic imperfections, creating a trustworthy selling environment. Overall, there is a positive reception towards the vehicle's appearance and the seller's honest business practices.
Neutral: @dlbuffalo expressed a desire for additional features, specifically heated seats, suggesting that while the car is attractive, it could benefit from more comfort options. @Fleuger99 described the car as a lovely instance but pointed out the presence of marks and scratches, thus acknowledging both its charm and the typical wear and tear expected of a used vehicle. Their comments show appreciation and slight reservations, reflecting a balanced view of the car's condition.
Negative: @Fleuger99's mention of the marks and scratches on the vehicle suggests a disappointment regarding its cosmetic condition, even though they still regard it as a nice car. @Alwaysanother1 reminisced about the beauty of older BMW models, indicating a sentiment that the current example may not live up to the brand's historical elegance. Such comments highlight a contrast between the vehicle's current state and nostalgic values held by some enthusiasts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @TonyBTony praised the car, describing it as beautiful and inquiring about the date codes on the tires, showing genuine interest in the vehicle's details. @KYOB also expressed admiration, calling the car very nice and asking about the length of the seller's ownership, indicating a desire to understand its history. Overall, the tone of these comments reflects a positive appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and condition.
Neutral: @aojustme requested a driving video and a cold start, which shows a level of interest in the car's performance but does not convey a strong opinion either way. @4WHEEL_GERMAN, the seller, promptly addressed inquiries from potential buyers about the vehicle's features and also confirmed that videos showcasing the car would be uploaded, reflecting a willingness to provide further information. This exchange indicates a neutral engagement from the seller towards the buyers' questions.
Negative: @JohnKennelly raised concerns about the car's condition, questioning whether anyone had smoked in it and how it smells, which could imply potential worries about residual odors affecting the vehicle’s appeal. Although @4WHEEL_GERMAN reassured @johnkennelly that the car is a non-smoker and comes with two keys, the initial inquiry suggests some hesitance about the vehicle's state. No other negative comments were directed towards the vehicle, but the concern from @johnkennelly adds an element of caution to the overall discussion.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and nostalgic value. @Dollycat3 described it as a 'gorgeous, rare Impala SS convertible', while @georgepehanick noted its 'old school cool' factor. @jimjim reminisced about their childhood rides in a similar car, stating a connection to the vehicle's heritage and suggesting that the seller share family memories to add to its story. @malmsCO and @joelinsd praised its aesthetics, with the latter complimenting the driving experience of the SS427 convertible, emphasizing its rarity and charm as a convertible.
Neutral: Several comments revealed a mix of curiosity and knowledge-sharing regarding specific details of the car's features, overall condition, and history. @Reflogic shared insights on the SS427 model and its relationships with other Impala configurations, while @e9er and @Noisyboyz discussed variations in interiors and features typically associated with the SS427 package. Commenters like @HarleyFXDL and @Ragsteve offered constructive criticism regarding the mechanical aspects and suggested looking into potential discrepancies about the vehicle's parts. There was a general appreciation for the vehicle's potential despite its issues, with some suggesting it could be a good restoration project.
Negative: Many commenters raised concerns about the car's authenticity and condition, particularly regarding the engine noise and parts discrepancies. @bobdog pointed out potential engine issues, while @mike_rockwell and @Noisyboyz noted concerns about the sounds coming from the engine. The presence of a non-standard rear end and mismatched interior components also drew criticism, with commenters like @68ss6468 and @Banksonit709 questioning whether the vehicle was a true SS427. Specific instructions for the seller to clarify the vehicle's history and answer the mounting questions about its condition dominated discussions, leading some, such as @Banksonit709, to express skepticism about the vehicle's listing status.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, with @Mouse51 reminiscing about how he used to drool over Ducati advertisements back in the 60s. @Moxie11 praised the overall look of the ride, describing it as classy despite some reservations about the front turn signals. The seller, @Goducky150, responded positively about the bike's features, including a comfortable seat height and upgraded electrical system, affirming that the bike is fully operational and enjoyable after modification.
Neutral: Some discussions focused on the specific engine type, with @Mike_Parsons inquiring if it was a valve spring or Desmo engine, and @madscientist781 clarifying that it is a narrow case valve spring engine. @Hreiss11 expressed interest in seeing a cold start and mentioned a potential issue with the riding video suggesting a stumble, also highlighting a concern about the rear tire possibly being installed backwards. The seller acknowledged these inquiries and confirmed the bike was kept in the garage for three years with proper care.
Negative: Concerns were raised by a few commenters about the condition and history of the bike. @zeos2 questioned whether the running videos were recent, considering the seller's claim of not riding it for three years. @Mordizzle asked if the original components were available, only to find out from @Goducky150 that they are not. Furthermore, @zeos2 expressed a desire for a demonstration of the bike starting after being idle, which the seller declined to provide due to being out of town, leaving some prospective buyers uncertain about the bike's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg describes the vehicle as an "absolute beauty" and highlights its ownership as a special aspect. @APUM expresses intrigue regarding a Mitsubishi corporate letter that indicates the car's rarity, noting it is one of only 86 Glacier Pearl White models. @land_shark3 shares a nostalgic connection to the VR-4, indicating it was always a dream car and engages with other owners about the rear-steering deletion that they have experienced.
Neutral: @jsucameli acknowledges the beauty of the vehicle but emphasizes that rust is a significant concern, suggesting it could still be a worthwhile investment for someone who can manage the repairs. @Yamahadave is interested in how this model will compare to a recently sold similar vehicle. @Pvannimwegen expresses curiosity about the auction's progress while also sharing information about their own 99 VR4.
Negative: @DrCrash points out the disappointment in the lack of underspray to protect the car from northeastern winters, indicating the importance of maintenance. @DruDizz asks about the extent of the rust, seeking reassurance about the condition of the vehicle, which highlights potential issues for future owners. @pennymax313, who is the seller, confirms that the rust is not severe, but it does require attention, indicating possible hidden challenges.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive design and performance capabilities. @SteveBates describes it as fun to drive, and @GatorDMD notes the beautiful long hood. Enthusiasts like @GTCarGuy7 and @casejam also share excitement about the build quality and features, with the former stating it has to be amazing to drive. Additionally, @Reno (The Seller) provides detailed insights into the engineering behind the car, mentioning the innovative e-turbos and their benefits, which further contributes to the vehicle's appeal among car aficionados.
Neutral: Several comments focus on technical details and features of the vehicle, discussing aspects like the engineering of the twin electric turbos. @Rathertakearide raises questions about the design, while @tferrer and @casejam share their knowledge about forced induction and turbo systems. @Reno (The Seller) elaborates on these points, explaining how the setup works and the performance metrics, such as boost levels and fuel efficiency. This exchange indicates a shared appreciation for the car's engineering, though it reveals a mix of opinions about the complexity of the system.
Negative: Concerns regarding the car's usability and maintenance are raised by some commenters. @np89 wonders about the potential headaches of owning a car with unique modifications like electric turbos, while @moosehog asks about the absence of a stereo. @mig1980 expresses doubt about taking the car on long trips due to its lack of comfort features like A/C, which @Reno (The Seller) confirms. This indicates a potential barrier for some buyers who might find the car's sparse interior and specialized systems a challenge for everyday use.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @greenerdays11 (The Seller) welcomes the BAT Community's questions, highlighting their extensive service records exceeding $16,000, which speaks to the care taken with the vehicle. @GLWTA expresses a fondness for the Aegean Blue color of the SL, which is echoed by @edwardgrzzz's appreciation for it and their personal experience with a similar model. Additionally, @greenerdays11 promptly responds to requests for more information, including videos of the car in operation and undercarriage pictures, showcasing transparency and willingness to provide potential buyers with comprehensive details.
Neutral: Several comments raise questions about the vehicle's maintenance history and specific service records. @ottoPhile notes completed repairs such as control arms and mounts but also mentions concerns about a potential oil leak and the history of declined repairs. @1967tiger further questions whether any repairs were made concerning the noted declined services and inquires about any warning lights. @greenerdays11 reassures that there are no dash lights on and clarifies some minor repairs were postponed, indicating the seller's effort to maintain the car's quality despite some service history confusion.
Negative: Concerns regarding the service records and the vehicle's maintenance are evident, particularly from @ottoPhile who highlights gaps in documentation and asks about periodic oil changes. @1967tiger expresses worries about declined repairs, questioning the overall condition and reliability of the vehicle. Although @greenerdays11 defends the car's condition and assures that previous work has been thoroughly addressed, skepticism persists surrounding the vehicle’s long-term care due to incomplete maintenance records.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @PMerkle finds the exhaust sound of the vehicle to be extraordinary, likening it to a 'biblical' experience even over phone speakers, expressing a strong desire to experience it in person. @OwenG (The Seller) confirms that the bike is equipped with many high-end components, including a unique tunnel port exhaust, titanium bolts, and carbon fiber fittings, making it a standout model. Additionally, @OwenG notes that he has included all original equipment with the bike, ensuring buyers will receive everything necessary and more.
Neutral: @Tirefriar raises important questions about the bike's original parts and potential fluid leaks, which suggests a thoughtful consideration for the vehicle's condition. @Dheffel1 answers the fuel trimmer inquiry by referencing a cold start video, reassuring potential buyers that the bike has a fuel trimmer included. The discussion around the aftermarket mirrors and takeoff parts indicates a balanced view on the bike's modifications while confirming that the aesthetic alterations still maintain the vehicle's functionality.
Negative: @Tirefriar expresses concern regarding the presence of oil leaks which are known issues with TL-R motors, indicating a level of skepticism about the bike's condition. Additionally, there is mention of stock mirrors being ineffective, which could detract from the riding experience. While @OwenG downplays these concerns by stating there are no leaks, the initial worries of @Tirefriar remain valid for potential buyers thinking about performance and reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @lovetodriveoldcars (The Seller) expresses pride in owning the vehicle for 13 years, highlighting that it has been stored in an indoor heated garage. Commentors like @MikethePlumber and @Moodys911 admire the car's aesthetic, particularly its color and beauty, indicating a strong visual appeal. @AlfaBase recalls a thrilling experience with a similar vehicle, noting that it garners more attention than high-end sports cars, which adds to its desirability.
Neutral: There is a mix of inquiries about the vehicle's condition and features. @dmfick asks for more detailed images of areas like the trunk, frunk, and sound system, reflecting the need for additional transparency in the listing. @Jokervalve raises a question about the lack of a VIN, expressing concern about registration implications, while @Austinite notes uneven tire wear and seeks clarification on the front tires. @lovetodriveoldcars (The Seller) responds to these queries, assuring that new photos and videos will be posted.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, there are concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance and aesthetics. @Jokervalve mentions that the engine bay appears dirty, suggesting it could use cleaning and detailing. @Austinite and @Spokayman discuss the negative camber of the tires, implying potential issues with suspension or alignment. @RS60Spyder questions the lack of VIN photos and details about the vehicle's condition, which may deter potential buyers wary of registration difficulties.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express sheer admiration for the 2001 Acura Integra Type R (ITR), emphasizing its pristine condition and historical significance within the Honda community. @Vtec4ever describes it as "mouth watering" and "fantastic," while @Dollycat3 calls it "absolutely the finest" vehicle they have seen. Commenters like @UKDM and @onlyhonda4me highlight how these cars are iconic and worth every penny, reflecting nostalgia and reverence for the craftsmanship behind the ITR. The excitement surrounding the auction peaks with predictions of record-breaking bids, with multiple commenters suggesting it could reach unprecedented amounts, potentially the first $200k type for this model.
Neutral: Some remarks are observational, focusing on the rarity and cultural importance of the vehicle without overt enthusiasm or negativity. @RTCH_Cars (The Seller) provides insights into the vehicle's history and careful maintenance, explaining it has only accumulated 500 additional miles since being acquired. Several commenters also share their own experiences with ITRs or discuss the broader implications of the vehicle's sale, touching on topics like market trends and the increase in value among sports cars of this era. Specific production details are referenced by @Earlyoil and @DDStuttgart, which contribute to an understanding of the ITR's legacy.
Negative: Amidst the praise, a few comments point out the bittersweet nature of selling a car with such a rich history, noting that it may never be driven as it should be. @caideN remarks on the sadness of the car being a museum piece instead of being enjoyed on the road. Others express skepticism about the financial motivations behind the auction, suggesting that the hype surrounding the car may be excessive or that it represents a monopoly of wealth within the automotive collector community, as indicated by @jchez7's comments regarding the price point. Additionally, @BMLeib emphasizes that while pristine examples are valued, there is merit in vehicles that have been driven and enjoyed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, describing it as absolutely stunning and exceptional. @Dollycat3 noted the Dual-Ghia's beauty, while @kenkars simply stated that it was off to a strong start. @Barryward exclaimed, "Mama mia what a beautiful ghai," showcasing a strong appreciation for the aesthetics. @GDogg praised the convertible, conjuring images of iconic personalities like Dean Martin, further enhancing the vehicle's glamorous association. Others like @boaboyoz and @sludgo echoed similar sentiments, calling it a dazzling example and noting its status as the belle of the ball, suggesting that it holds a cherished place in the hearts of classic car enthusiasts.
Neutral: Some comments provided interesting context or history surrounding the Dual-Ghia without overt praise or criticism. For instance, @57charlie referenced Frank Sinatra's ownership of a 1961 model, while @TJClassic pointed out the car's cultural significance in films. @Fleche_dOr provided a detailed look into the vehicle's auction history, discussing previous sales and the Rat Pack's connection to its allure. @curt51 (The Seller) answered questions regarding features like the manual convertible top, while also acknowledging the questions about the original exterior color and equipment. This gives potential buyers insight beyond the vehicle's outward appeal.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns or criticisms about specific aspects of the Dual-Ghia. @Pistol_Pete questioned the car's red/black color combination, deeming it somewhat unimpressive for such a special automobile, and asked about the original colors. Additionally, there was a note regarding the transmission type, with @Pistol_Pete noting the PowerFlite rather than the expected Torqueflite for a 1957 model. @wallyworld24's comment explored whether the car was made with Palm Springs in mind, although @curt51 clarified it was not, keeping the inquiry somewhat critical, albeit more in curiosity than malice.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express enthusiasm about the vehicle's unique presentation and driving experience. @F1Rocket praised the Daytona for being a raw and engaging driving experience, emphasizing that it's not comparable to typical family cars—something that aligns with the interests of weekend racers or driving enthusiasts. @abarto27, the seller, engaged positively with questions and concerns while highlighting the functional aspects of the car, such as the effective A/C and the engineered design without windows, assured potential buyers about the comfort and aerodynamics.
Neutral comments focused on inquiries regarding specific features of the vehicle, particularly related to the absence of side windows and their relationship with the A/C system. Commentors like @barchetta97 and @MGB6 questioned the practicality of having A/C without windows, while the seller provided clarity that A/C does function well despite this design choice. @abarto27 also noted that there are options available for adding windows, citing aftermarket solutions, which indicates an openness to modifications.
On the other hand, some concerns were raised regarding the condition of the vehicle and its performance. Comments from @mocktwo highlighted the need for closer inspection of potential scuffs and damages, such as on the shift boot and dash. @Johnshelby09 expressed concern about the vehicle’s steering behavior in the driving video, suggesting it may have issues requiring attention. @RockNRollTattoo asked about engine horsepower and weight, indicating a desire for performance data which could inform their buying decision. Overall, while several remarks were primarily positive or neutral, there were clear expressions of concern regarding vehicle quality and functionality.
Neutral:
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Wagonista finds the Twingo magnificent, highlighting its charm and character. @bondgraham appreciates the upholstery material, considering it worth the price of admission by itself. @Classichondaman expresses sadness over the decline of small, artistic cars, noting how wonderful it is to see a Twingo available. @oxenreiter reminisces about loving the Twingo they imported years ago and desires to add one to their collection. Many commenters expressed admiration for the Twingo's unique design, with @David_P asserting that cars from this era, including Twingos, remain adorable.
Neutral: @WheelsForReels (The Seller) confirms that the Twingo does not have air conditioning in response to @Wagonista's inquiry. They clarify to @J.B.2.1. that not all Twingos came with a canvas roof and provide information about the car's condition, including that it was previously owned by a doctor and was garage-kept. They assure potential buyers that the car is in excellent shape, has no issues, and comes with spare brake parts. @la_malice mentions that air conditioning was an option for Twingos with smaller engines, as sought after by @adguy924cgt.
Negative: Criticism appears subtly in comments like @Bobror's concern regarding the vehicle's inspection status in New York, suggesting potential emissions testing issues. Additionally, @LongDucDong laments the lack of personality in modern car designs compared to classic ones like the Twingo, expressing a desire for such designs to become mainstream again. @Bendy500 raises logistical questions about the timing belt and water pump replacements, expressing uncertainty regarding maintenance records.
![]() |
2011 Ford F-450 Super Duty XLT Power Stroke Dually 4×4 Utility Truck
1FD0X4HT7BEA75121
Lot 201924
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered enthusiastic praise from several commenters who highlight its impressive features. @CarFoolLane suggests that the rear crane would be a hit among car friends, making it a social asset. @JasonC. envisions its potential as a versatile overlanding rig, while @boaboyoz appreciates the truck's robustness and practicality. @Themcclintock shares personal experience, describing a similar model as a 'pulling beast' that is enjoyable to drive.
Neutral: Many comments revolve around the seller's detailed responses to inquiries about the truck's specifications. @HighlyFavored808 asks about the A/C functionality, to which @William_Mo (The Seller) confirms it works well. @smlobx requests specific measurements of the bed, receiving clear details on dimensions from the seller. Additionally, @David_P points out that load charts for the crane would be beneficial for prospective buyers, validating the vehicle's work potential.
Negative: Despite the strong interest in the truck, there are some concerns. @Bigfitter inquires about the engine hours, and @Cabaum expresses a hesitation to upgrade from their existing vehicle, noting they will likely stick with their 2003 model. Comments indicate that some potential buyers seek further reassurance about the truck’s condition and functionality, suggesting a cautious approach to the auction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments reflect the strong admiration for the vehicle, particularly regarding its durability and classic features. @mfontaine2008 appreciates the 'low tech' analog controls, noting they are more reliable than modern touch screens. @Espanolie highlights the impressive preservation of the 100 series, while @41togo shares a glowing road trip experience, emphasizing the comfort and reliability of the LC during travel. Overall, the vehicle is seen as well-maintained for its age and a great choice for enthusiasts looking to buy a unique classic car.
Neutral: Several neutral queries and factual exchanges highlight the logistics and condition of the vehicle. @Schlupp inquires about a window leak, and the seller, @jasonp06069, confirms that it exists but is infrequent. @dhfosg75 questions the functionality of the electronics, receiving confirmation that all features, except for a minor cosmetic indicator light, are functioning well. Overall, these comments reveal potential buyers' interest in the vehicle's condition and functionality, without expressing strong opinions either way.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about minor issues with the vehicle. @MeatyOccre notes an invoice mentioning possible rust around the windshield, prompting a request for photos. Concerns about the cosmetic state of the 4WD indicator light and potential water drainage issues from the sunroof are also discussed, with @Pedges56 and @41togo mentioning common maintenance issues faced by older models. Although the seller addresses these issues, they indicate that some aspects might require attention or future investment.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, describing it as absolutely gorgeous and stunning. @PontiacNut emphasized its beauty, while @Trose65 noted the car's stance and originality, declaring it their favorite year for the Nova. Other users like @Muttsydog1 and @ssterry mentioned their fondness for the car's aesthetic appeal despite not being fans of red. @JayKay2430 and @Raffi (The Seller) highlighted the special build and performance of the Nova, commending the modifications that maintained its originality, making it a desirable choice for enthusiasts. Overall, commenters seemed captivated by the car's design and the thoughtfulness behind its restoration.
Neutral: Several commenters sought additional information regarding specific vehicle details and performance capabilities. @Lancess inquired about starting problems during warm restarts, which @Raffi (The Seller) quickly addressed, indicating that the engine performed reliably under various conditions. Other users, like @Highlander63, provided their insights on the engineering aspects of the vehicle, such as the relationship between the 283 and the 327 engine sizes, and commented on the vehicle's condition overall. @Shopie and @tlcamg asked for clarification on the rearend specifications, demonstrating keen interest in understanding the car's potential beyond its aesthetic appeal.
Negative: A few comments reflected some skepticism or concern regarding technical aspects of the vehicle. @Tripletip raised doubts about the safety of boring a 283 engine, which @Raffi (The Seller) countered with detailed explanations of the engineering process. @Banksonit709, while acknowledging the appeal of the model, expressed regret over mobility issues preventing him from driving a manual transmission. Similarly, @Shopie sought specific details about rearend specifications but did not receive a definitive answer. These comments underscored a mix of enthusiasm with a hint of caution among potential buyers.
![]() |
227-Mile 1995 Harley-Davidson Electra Glide Ultra Classic 30th Anniversary
1HD1FCR17SY601120
Lot 201947
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express excitement about the 1995 Harley Davidson Electra Glide Ultra Classic, highlighting its exceptionally low mileage of only 227 miles. @2ndGenGenovese shares a personal experience of buying a similar model, indicating satisfaction with the value and performance. The unique aspect of this motorcycle being a tribute to the original 1965 Electra Glide is also appreciated, creating a sense of nostalgia and desirability among potential buyers. Additionally, @fourseventytwo emphasizes the importance of featuring the low mileage prominently in the listing, which could attract more interest to a bike regarded as a 'time capsule.'
Neutral: Several comments focus on inquiries regarding the vehicle's features and maintenance history. @DanD04 asks about the original tires and oil status, while @Chile67 queries about the emissions sticker, showing that prospective buyers are interested in the bike's condition and compliance. The seller responds to these questions with detailed information, indicating that the tires were replaced, the battery was recently changed, and confirming the presence of the emissions sticker. This suggests that while the bike is highly desirable, buyers remain cautious and thorough in their evaluations.
Negative: Comments also reflect some skepticism about the bike's history and preservation due to its very low mileage. @DrDick questions the documentation regarding its preservation, hinting at concerns over whether the bike has been adequately maintained over time. @454rat points out that anyone questioning the bike's history may lack experience in the used vehicle market, which indirectly raises doubts about its provenance and care. These comments suggest that some potential buyers might be hesitant about the bike's long-term reliability despite its impressive appearance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments reflect a strong appreciation for the 2007 Ford Mustang Saleen Parnelli Jones Edition, noting its uniqueness and desirability as a collectible vehicle. @joecross emphasizes that the car does not receive the respect it deserves, highlighting its rarity and performance characteristics. @tr4747r and @FrenchyMarty also echo this sentiment, expressing admiration for their own Saleen cars and noting that the market has yet to fully recognize their true value. @wxflyer mentions the impressive modifications of the Parnelli Jones edition, with a keen interest in understanding how it compares to Ford's Boss 302.
Neutral: There are some intriguing discussions about the technical specifications of the vehicle. For instance, @TBcars inquires about the engine size, prompting @gdspc to clarify that Saleen modified it to a true 5.0L. Furthermore, @DKeng acknowledges the respectable 400 hp offered by the non-supercharged version, adding that Saleen and Roush vehicles do not typically receive the respect they warrant in the performance car community. There are also various comments regarding the special collaboration behind the car as well as logistical offers and business aspects from Collectible Classics, the seller.
Negative: Some comments suggest a prevailing misunderstanding or lack of awareness about the true value of the vehicle. @tr4747r mentions that his own Saleen H302 SC, which is even rarer, is undervalued in the current market. This sentiment appears to resonate among several commenters, indicating a collective concern that the full potential and legacy of these vehicles is overlooked. Additionally, while the seller presents a positive image of their operations, there remains a subtle undercurrent from some users implying skepticism about the general appreciation and value recognition of these rare cars.
![]() |
|
|
Positive: @IndySam expresses strong enthusiasm for the 2017 model, highlighting that it has been reliable and enjoyable for his family, even though some features like Apple Car Play weren't available initially. He appreciates the car’s power and comfort, indicating that he is considering whether to keep his own similar vehicle. @4WHEEL_GERMAN is proactive in responding to inquiries from potential buyers, indicating a willingness to provide additional information and fix issues, which reflects positively on the seller's customer service. This responsiveness is evident as he prepares to upload videos showcasing various aspects of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments inquire about specific details related to the vehicle's condition and features. @Hatzenbach requests pictures of the screens when the ignition is ON, while @7ACM7 asks for a picture with the trunk open and back seats folded, as well as inspection reports. @MK_Ultra seeks clarification on the presence of a spare key, any prior paint work, and the condition of the tires. These inquiries are typical of potential buyers wanting to ensure transparency about the vehicle’s status and usability.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's technology and history. @eurocarfanatic points out that while the 2017 model provides a newer infotainment system than prior years, it still operates on a 3G network, limiting some connectivity features compared to later models. There is an implied worry about reliability, particularly in technology that could impact convenience, as seen in @MK_Ultra's request to know about any leaks or mechanical issues. Overall, these comments suggest that while there is interest in the vehicle, some potential buyers are cautious due to concerns over the car's technology and performance history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @66Malibu expressed a deep love for vintage Ducatis, having owned several models and noting that this bike represents a true race machine. @2hecknback praised the bike as a cool example of an iconic machine with early graphics and an alloy tank, while @IMK67 described riding it as a 'Time Machine,' highlighting its design advantages. @ferrovecchio (The Seller) emphasized the bike's historical significance, noting its connection to world championship wins and the rarity of the F1A model, which has been meticulously preserved for the next owner. Additionally, @MikeHurley referred to it as a beautiful bike, further underscoring its appeal.
Neutral: @zonarosso provided technical insights, explaining the differences between the A and B models of this bike and confirming that the bike is stock. @chrispy350 inquired about the documentation regarding the B model's uprated specification, indicating a general interest in the bike's collecting potential. @Johnmccoyitaly referenced an old factory brochure to substantiate details about different models alongside the F1B, illustrating the historical context and documentation available for collectors and enthusiasts.
Negative: @GRATHE mentioned the challenges faced during production, noting that the difference in specifications and the custom nature of the F1 models could lead to variability among individual bikes. The comment also implied that finding a truly stock model could be difficult for buyers, potentially affecting market prices and collectability. @Slim_Chance expressed a personal preference for other models, insinuating that while the F1 is significant, other versions like the Montjuich or Laguna Seca might take precedence for collectors, which could impact perceptions of this specific model.
![]() |
Supercharged, 34k-Mile 2004 Toyota Tacoma SR5 Xtracab TRD 4×4 V6
5TEWN72N34Z380776
Lot 201955
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters are impressed with the vehicle's overall condition and modifications. @Discobob mentioned that someone really loved the vehicle, emphasizing its lovely example, and @CRUSH appreciates the low mileage and the vehicle's stunning appearance. @SupraFreak complimented the last year of the first generation model, noting its low miles and clean condition underneath, while also expressing enthusiasm for the supercharger and upgraded suspension that enhances its off-road capability. @Boulderer echoed this sentiment by admiring the Tacoma and requesting additional photos of the suspension setup, which indicates a strong interest in the vehicle's performance.
Neutral: There are several inquiries regarding the vehicle's modifications and history. @rbrodniak asked about further details on modifications made to support the supercharger, while other commenters, like @irishjig13 and @stevefi12345, discussed the likelihood of frame replacement based on the truck's history in North Carolina. @DLVRYMN and @Alabamafbfan1985 discussed the lift kit and its implications on returning the truck to stock height, suggesting a typical concern for prospective buyers with lifted vehicles. The discussion around the condition and modifications reflects a balanced consideration of the vehicle's attributes in the comments.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about the vehicle's modifications and suitability for all buyers. @Drpeteone expressed that the lift may be too much for their personal taste. @BCG1 questioned the lack of Icon suspension parts visible in photos, and @Boulderer requested further details on frame modifications that may have been made for the lift, indicating a need for clarity regarding the vehicle's integrity. Additionally, @Giovanni930 raised a question regarding rust issues, suggesting a level of caution among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @bs3012 praised the seller, @carsfromafar, for their professionalism, thoroughness, and knowledge after importing a vehicle for him, indicating he would be a repeat client. @carsfromafar expressed appreciation for the positive feedback from @bs3012. Additionally, @greenmtngti complimented the truck's appearance and provided a helpful clarification regarding the vehicle's specifications, demonstrating engagement and attention to detail in the auction space.
Neutral: The auction has prompted several questions regarding the vehicle's features. @brianwood1 inquired about the presence of a limited slip differential, to which @carsfromafar responded negatively, indicating it does not have one. Similarly, @KevinKid asked whether the vehicle comes equipped with air conditioning, and @carsfromafar confirmed that it does not. @carsfromafar also noted that he is able to accommodate shipping requests, responding positively to the interest from potential buyers.
Negative: There was a notable error in the listing identified by @greenmtngti, who pointed out that the vehicle is equipped with a carburetor rather than fuel injection, a clarification that @carsfromafar acknowledged and responded to. Such discrepancies can lead to confusion among potential bidders, illustrating the importance of accurate listings in online auctions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the Aston Martin Vantage AMR PRO, highlighting its amazing design and rarity. @Jano4 shares excitement, stating, "Good Lord this thing is amazing!" @P1Automotive (The Seller) reiterates this sentiment as they promote the uniqueness of this model, inviting potential buyers to appreciate its ultra-rare status. Other users, such as @Msobczyk and @waffles2, describe the car as stunning and extremely cool, with @Dollycat3 noting its potential high price due to its exclusivity and track performance focus. The vehicle garners praise for its aesthetics with comments like @Jdstell's, "So attractive 💚," and @GDogg's, "Wow, that’s a stunner!"
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions about the technical features of the vehicle, indicating a mix of interest and inquiry. @P1Automotive (The Seller) provides details about the car's specifications, including the original MSRP of $1,298,000, and its intended use for track performance. User @JHBBII humorously suggests the navigation screen is intended for offtrack escapades, while @jcwenger asks what other functionalities the screen offers. The seller clarifies that the pop-up display controls various multimedia features and displays technical data such as power and torque, showcasing the vehicle's hybrid nature as both a track car and a tech-savvy machine.
Negative: However, some users express skepticism about the vehicle's price and functionality. @Mr_Persnickety questions the $1,298,000 price tag, and @scuderiaferrari expresses disbelief regarding its initial cost, comparing it to another high-value car and prompting an informative reply from @P1Automotive (The Seller). There are also comments about the car's weight, with @Stark0116 noting that its curb weight of 1,910 kg seems heavy for a track-focused vehicle, which could deter some prospective buyers. @HemiEddie426 points out a discrepancy in transmission descriptions, leading to debate about the car's technical specifications. Lastly, @RWL528 raises questions about the car's loudness for track use, indicating concerns that may affect its appeal to certain buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express their enthusiasm and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and desirability as a potential purchase. @Irhmsd calls it a 'nice first 911,' while @Beans_Bacon describes it as 'beautiful.' @Caymanorcarrera also praises its restoration and aesthetic features like the Light Yellow color and proper 15s, suggesting that it could attract a lot of attention. @GatorDMD emphasizes that someone will be very happy with this car, further underscoring its appeal. Additionally, @earlyaircooled (The Seller) provides assurances about the vehicle's condition and confirms that it is not a project car but rather 'just about perfect.'
Neutral: @earlyaircooled (The Seller) provides detailed information regarding the vehicle's history and maintenance, mentioning that the car was originally purchased in Santa Barbara and has been kept indoors for many years. Despite claiming its originality, the seller acknowledges that some components, like the battery area, have been replaced, addressing questions from potential buyers. While some commenters inquire about the car's history, such as its air conditioning system's status, the focus seems to remain on clarifying any ambiguities related to its condition and previous ownership.
Negative: Commentary does not heavily delve into negative aspects of the vehicle, but some comments raise concerns regarding maintenance history and detail inquiries, such as @Jonfrancis asking about the A/C system. Additionally, there are implied concerns about the car’s past non-operational period, as @earlyaircooled (The Seller) admits that it did not run initially and required extensive repairs, although these issues were resolved. It's evident that while the car has received praise, there remains a cautious curiosity regarding its past and the seller's extensive modifications and repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and unique features. @JeffPGH and @AlbertaBoy appreciate the aesthetics of the car, while @Panhead48 and @Johnnyvett show excitement over its specifications and the overall design. @topduarte positively notes the functionality of the videos provided with the listing, indicating that they found the extra content helpful. The seller, @Trencherking, adds authenticity to the conversation by sharing backstory and details about the car.
Neutral: The topic of the car's sale raises questions among potential buyers. @GlennChristenbury and @gaw query the reasons behind the quick sale, with @GlennChristenbury expressing curiosity about the short ownership period. @Electric400 and @mv3 bring up concerns regarding the condition of the car, particularly focusing on the core support's rust. @diamondsforever asks about the functionality of specific features, which reflects a prudent interest in the vehicle's operational status.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition are prevalent among some commentators. @mv3 points out that the radiator support may have more than just surface rust, prompting further questions about the vehicle's overall integrity. @Texasbandit expresses disappointment, suggesting that the car should have undergone a more thorough inspection before being sold. This negativity around the potential flaws indicates a level of apprehension among interested buyers, likely stemming from the seller's brief ownership period and the car's reported issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @00SolarTJ1 expresses admiration for the vehicle's classic color combination and hails it as a peak Porsche from the 80s, showing strong preference over contemporary models. @xleb1995 calls the car incredible and shares a personal connection by naming it among their dream cars. @ScottNThompson describes it as an addictive driver’s car, adding to the vehicle's allure for enthusiasts. @Texasnoiz succinctly acknowledges it with excitement, while @alfriedesq labels it an amazing machine. @GatorDMD echoes this sentiment by simply stating it is beautiful, and @Coldbru highlights its appealing champagne leather option, contributing to the overall positive reception of the vehicle.
Neutral: Comments from @motorcarmarketusa (The Seller) address inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition, providing transparency about the available cold start video and pledge to upload another for potential bidders. They clarify that no comprehensive leakdown or compression tests have been conducted, although they confidently assert that the engine and transmission are functioning smoothly. As for service records, they inform @BrightLN and others about the attached documents from the current owner's time with the car, noting that no prior records exist. Furthermore, they address questions about paint meter readings, showing diligence in providing prospective buyers with necessary information.
Negative: Concerns arise from @gumshoe3000 and @zmhdes regarding the absence of detailed tests on the vehicle's mechanics, specifically asking whether a proper cold start video will be provided, along with details about oil leakage and transmission health. @zmhdes questions whether the clutch has been inspected and if there are any issues with the car, indicating some apprehension among potential buyers about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous comments highlight the stunning appearance and quality of the vehicle, with @jturner describing it as 'beautiful!' and @CrimsonRed04GT declaring it their 'absolute favorite Corvette'. @Fuelieguy commends the seller, @idgidu, for refreshing a rarely seen fawn beige over black 1962 Corvette, claiming it provides a wonderful cruising experience. Commenters, including @Davo356, praise the top-notch workmanship and beautiful color combination, while @Marbi5 appreciates the overall job done on the classic car. @rosmun1 mentions familiarity with the car, noting it as an awesome vehicle owned by a class act, and @Alpine804 recognizes it as a "beautiful Vette".
Neutral: Several comments discuss the vehicle's modifications without taking a strong stance either way. @Capt_Nemo expresses relief that not all C1 Corvettes are restored to factory specifications, advocating for a balance between original and modified versions. @GreggC appreciates both the original and modified perspectives, suggesting that C1 enthusiasts would enjoy seeing both variations at an event. @idgidu (The Seller) addresses queries about the paint color and vehicle's upgrades, confirming the quality of the restoration and care taken during the paint job, while noting the car didn't require extensive modifications to revert to stock if desired. Meanwhile, @Noisyboyz shares their journey with their own Corvette, finding enjoyment in customization for drivability.
Negative: There are a few minor critiques regarding the car's paint and condition. @idgidu (The Seller) acknowledges three tiny visible cracks on the body and a previously damaged area on the fender that had been repaired but remains slightly visible. While the seller downplays these flaws, they are transparent about their existence and offer opportunities for repair if the buyer desires it. @idgidu also mentions the power antenna's incorrect designation and miscommunication regarding front bumper replacements, emphasizing their commitment to honesty about the vehicle's condition. Overall, the concerns raised are minimal compared to the vehicle's overall acclaim.
![]() |
383-Powered 1972 Chevrolet Chevelle Malibu Sport Coupe 4-Speed
1D37J2L586022
Lot 201938
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @ssterry finds the car cool, suggesting that the SS badges should be removed since it doesn't need them. @starship-shuttle appreciates the color scheme of the 1972 Chevelle, even though they prefer the 1970 body style. @Cjcj76 loves the car's stance and is curious about its handling, while @Tigerv8 and @hotrodjim show interest in seeing more videos of the vehicle, particularly a cold start and driving footage. @Rossman88 (The Seller) notes that videos will be available when the weather is nicer.
Neutral: @Rossman88 (The Seller) provides insights into the vehicle's specifications, stating that the 383 motor is rated for 350 horsepower and 440 torque, potentially reaching around 400 horsepower with its current setup. He estimates the rear gear ratio to be in the low to mid 3’s based on the car's cruising performance at 75 mph and 2000 rpm. In response to @LKG66's query about the rear gear ratio, @Rossman88 mentions he is unsure but will investigate further.
Negative: @Cjcj76 questions if the car handles as well as it looks, implying a concern about its performance. Meanwhile, @hotrodjim offers a tip to @Rossman88 (The Seller) on determining the rear gear ratio without removing the cover, suggesting that the seller may not have fully considered the car's technical specifications. @Intimidator04 humorously responds to @ssterry's comment, indicating a sense of confusion over the term 'smigblock' and hinting at a light-hearted critique of the conversation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors express significant enthusiasm for the vehicle, with @thegreentreefrog, the seller, highlighting how fun it is to drive, particularly at car meets where it attracts attention from onlookers. @bforbesut appreciates the car's enduring appeal and describes it as an amazing vehicle. @coffeebreak and others reminisce about the car's components, praising the clamshell design, crossflow engine, and Weber carburetors, emphasizing that these attributes contribute to an exceptional driving experience.
Neutral: Several comments inquire about specific technical details related to the engine and car setup. @1of80 and @ORacer ask clarifying questions about the engine's performance characteristics, while @FrankFF47 and @RichardPetty seek information on compression ratios and modifications. @jbcollier suggests the appearance of the stone guards might be a gravel guard or truck bed liner, indicating a shared curiosity regarding the vehicle's features and history, which the seller addresses earnestly.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, there are a few critiques regarding the vehicle's practicality. @TimV64 mentions the lack of air conditioning, implying a need for additional comfort in hot weather. @RichardPetty comments on the changes made to the front shocks and springs, questioning the seller's choices without outright criticism. Additionally, remarks like 'weird headlights' from @TheOMDude and 'weird car!' from @RichardPetty hint at reservations some may feel about the car's aesthetic or modifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @JGraham describes the vehicle as a super cool and super rare e30 coupe in incredible condition with a lot of tasty upgrades. Another enthusiast, @platelets, expresses admiration for the car's aesthetic, saying it's a fantastic looking car and complimenting the Type 1 wheels. @Osuwari also praises the car by simply stating it is beautiful. Moreover, @Bruceg1973 (The Seller) engages positively with the community by acknowledging comments and promising to upload a video of the motor running, as well as providing additional information on the car's features and specifications.
Neutral: Commenters are actively asking questions about the vehicle, with @gdnorrie inquiring about the sunroof's functionality and possible leaks, to which @Bruceg1973 (The Seller) confirms that it works without issues. @toytrucker questions whether the car is titled as a 1989 BMW 320i, and @Bruceg1973 (The Seller) affirms this. There are inquiries regarding importing the vehicle, with @milliganj1990 seeking information on electronic payment options for US buyers; @Bruceg1973 (The Seller) provides detailed guidance on the payment process and necessary documentation.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding features available in the car. @Dr.Gonzo asks whether the car has air conditioning, to which @Bruceg1973 (The Seller) confirms it was not equipped with AC, potentially disappointing buyers looking for that feature. Additionally, @bmwe30m3guy voices concerns about the condition of the dashboard, suspecting there might be damage; although @Bruceg1973 (The Seller) responds by stating there are only minor blemishes and no cracks, it still underscores a level of skepticism among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Hackberry comments on the aesthetic appeal of the car, noting how the photographs capture its beauty better than previous ones, expressing admiration for the color. @Vtec4ever praises the classic nature of the vehicle, appreciating that it has not been modernized and recognizes its historical significance. @stugottz adds a simple yet enthusiastic remark about the car's beauty, while @Mercuryman highlights the impressive features, including the art deco panel and speedometer, celebrating the craftsmanship of the era.
Neutral: @59caddyman, the seller, introduces himself and provides detailed information about the car’s history, including its award-winning past and restoration work. He emphasizes the current condition, stating that the vehicle runs well and is presented beautifully, inviting questions from potential buyers. @1935V8 acknowledges the car's lovely appearance but raises concerns about previously noted issues, seeking clarification on whether they have been addressed while also complimenting the enhanced engine bay's presentation.
Negative: @1935V8's feedback implies that there were some visible issues in prior auction photos, particularly concerning the running boards, suggesting a lack of clarity about whether these problems have been resolved. His inquiry about the inclusion of trophies indicates some disappointment or concern regarding the completeness of the sale. The overall tone suggests that while the car is appealing, there are lingering doubts that potential buyers may consider before making a purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The Mercedes-Benz 500SEC AMG has been praised for its aesthetic appeal and historical significance. @Dean_Laumbach described it as 'magnificent' and a perfect example of '1980s European car that screams period cool'. Many commenters appreciated the work done by the seller, @Vander, who they believe has taken pride in restoring the vehicle to a high standard. @TheEnthusiastGarage noted its impressive performance and instant ignition, highlighting the car's excellent fuel injection condition. Overall, there's a strong sentiment that this vehicle is a remarkable piece of automotive history.
Neutral: Several commentators engaged in technical discussions about the vehicle's specifications and modifications. @MontanaOutlaw666 inquired about the odometer and whether it involved any issues, while @Smcase22 asked about the engine modifications and any paperwork from AMG. Throughout the conversation, comments provided a mix of curiosity about the car’s specific features, including its engine performance, aesthetics, and restoration details. @FlyingLotus shared a personal connection to the car's history, mentioning the original owner, indicating its emotional significance beyond just its mechanics.
Negative: Some comments expressed skepticism and concerns regarding certain aspects of the car. @SlowNRusty noticed a fitting issue with the front spoiler, raising questions about its condition. Additionally, @1783pictures criticized the color mismatch of the wheels with the body, expressing a wish for better coherence in design. @Porschephile561 speculated on potential discrepancies in the engine specifications, questioning whether it included specific performance upgrades. While the overall reception is largely positive, these comments reveal underlying concerns about authenticity and finer details.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the Saab 9-5 Aero, highlighting its unique features and history. @BMWE90Guy and @SaabFan noted its aesthetics and performance capabilities, praising its nimbleness, reliability, and comfort. @SuperKram shared personal anecdotes about the car, emphasizing its significance in the late owner's life as a cherished family vehicle. @Carmalarky remarked on its well-preserved state and the upgrades it has received, calling it an honest and desirable car. Additionally, @JM1965 discussed the emotional attachment their family has to the vehicle, enhancing its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Some comments focused on the vehicle's service history and specifications without showing strong opinions either way. @lewtus brought up concerns about the age of the tires and necessary maintenance items, while @larisa inquired about specific parts that require regular replacement. @notBIGyet and @Eric_NW engaged in discussions regarding the car's purchase history and its unique features compared to regular models, which added context to its value. Meanwhile, @Oldnfast pointed out the notable upgrades without passing judgment on the price or desirability.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about the car's technical details and condition. @lewtus and @allen9k questioned the accuracy of the horsepower and torque figures listed, suggesting a lack of trust in the provided information. There were also comments about the state of the tires, with @lewtus stating they were too old for safe use, indicating potential hidden costs for new tires. @SaabFan4 expressed skepticism about the current bidding price, suggesting that it might already be too high. Overall, these commentary threads reflect a mix of admiration and caution, particularly about the vehicle's service and historical aspects.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @DESERTVIPER praised the vehicle as a beautifully painted Hot Rod, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @Luda7718 commented on the bike being a very cool build and one of the best-looking BMW bikes seen in a long time. @JimiP shared his positive impressions, noting that the bike features well-thought-out modifications and good suspension upgrades, suggesting potential buyers take advantage of its cost and ride it without hesitation.
Neutral: @911r, the seller, provided a walk-around and cold start video of the bike and addressed various questions and comments from potential buyers. He explained that the dashboard was put on the bike when it was new, and all work was done at delivery miles. The seller also responded to inquiries about the bike's service records and modifications, emphasizing that it was a custom build and had never been laid down, despite some visible marks.
Negative: @NoDeuda expressed concerns about visible damage to the cylinder-head cover guards and questioned the seller about potential undisclosed damages. He suggested that the documentation indicating a full detail may be misleading. The seller, @911r, countered these claims, asserting that the marks were minor and resulted from the bike's tight clearance in a doorway, rather than any severe damage. Additionally, @Mil5150 critiqued the expectation for an older bike to be devoid of any scuffs, likening it to the market for relic guitars, where wear is sometimes celebrated.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Quince finds the vehicle to be nice, while @Benoit25 adds that it's a nice example but wishes it had a different interior. @Randy_Forbes laments not purchasing this vehicle, noting its cost-effectiveness compared to another model he bought instead. He expresses a sense of regret but also admiration for the car, calling it a lo-mi beauty that he believes will attract a lucky bidder. Other commenters like @Russ1946 and @CobrasBMW also echo positive sentiments, praising the car's aesthetics and quality, with @Russ1946 highlighting a wish for a different color.
Neutral: @justinz expresses a general love for the vehicle, mentioning his own experience with an S54 clownshoe. @PSL3vy- appreciates the car but acknowledges its popularity among collectors, which adds a different perspective. @jkkerouac raises a question regarding the use of all-season tires, curious about the choice but noting it could serve a purpose for demonstrating vehicle features. @mmhoss inquires about the vehicle's ownership status and receives a confirmation from @bolio74, indicating a good relationship with a past customer.
Negative: Commenters like @mmhoss express skepticism regarding the car's current ownership, seeking clarification on whether it belongs to Sandia BMW. Meanwhile, @jkkerouac's concern about the choice of tires reflects a critical angle on the vehicle's setup, hinting that it may not meet all enthusiasts' expectations. However, the overwhelming tone remains predominantly positive, with few strong negative remarks about the vehicle itself.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the impressive aspects of the vehicle, with @UncleFred1 stating that it's one of the nicest examples he has seen, particularly praising the combination of colors and factory carbon fiber interior. @boaboyoz describes the car as 'magnifique' and enticing, emphasizing its exquisite and exhilarating nature. Additionally, @absent shares a nostalgic memory of the sound of the SLR when driven spiritedly, likening it to a pair of low-flying Spitfires, further amplifying the allure of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters pose questions and request additional details about the vehicle, indicating a strong interest in the auction. @H2garage inquires about the paint protection film and the year of the tires, while @JerseyJeff01 asks if the paint is original factory and seeks clarification about the cost of the recent service. @PrivateCollectionMotors (The Seller) addresses these queries, confirming the presence of PPF and providing details about the car’s service history, showing they are engaged with potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns are raised by commenters regarding the high costs associated with owning the SLR. @JettJolene points out the vast expenses related to service and parts, indicating the car is not for the 'faint of wallet.' Similarly, @JerseyJeff01 expresses hesitance about placing a bid, noting that he is watching closely as the vehicle's auction progresses but feels it has not yet warmed up to his expectations. This hesitation reflects a potential drawback for buyers considering the ownership of such a high-maintenance performance vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Legendary_AI highlights the joy of driving a manual transmission N55 powered car, emphasizing its low mileage and lightweight construction, suggesting that it's a truly exhilarating experience. @STLYRT echoes this sentiment, pointing out that these cars are known for being fun and represent great value at the current price, further reinforcing the overall appeal of the vehicle. Additionally, @Keke2934 (The Seller) acknowledges @Legendary_AI's comment, celebrating the car as a 'very fast toy' and adding a personal touch that connects the seller with potential buyers.
Neutral: @Dadsmoneypit expresses curiosity about the vehicle's engine before confirming through VIN lookup, ultimately appreciating the manual transmission. @Keke2934 (The Seller) confirms that the vehicle does indeed feature the N55 engine, providing reassurance to potential buyers. The seller also shares additional details about the car, such as service records and the current mileage, which offers transparency to interested parties.
Negative: @jjandlj raises a concern regarding the vehicle's limited slip differential (LSD), indicating a need for clarification on its availability as it typically wouldn't be standard on the M235i. @Keke2934 (The Seller) responds by stating that the car does not have an LSD, which might disappoint potential buyers looking for that feature. Additionally, @SGR suggests that it would be beneficial for the seller to provide verification of the limited slip diff option to enhance credibility and buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @TadamT mentioned that the car is nearly the perfect daily driver due to its size and fun driving experience. @thecooter also expressed love for the car's performance and stated that it screams with excitement. @Boostwagon shared a similar enthusiasm, recalling how enjoyable their own MK6 GTI was, praising its practicality, excellent handling, and comfortable seating. Overall, there is a consensus among several commenters that the GTI is a joy to drive and well-suited for various uses.
Neutral: @radg615 (The Seller) provided details about the car's background, mentioning it was purchased from a fellow enthusiast who maintained meticulous records, including receipts of previous repairs. Several comments commended the inclusion of the damage photo as part of full disclosure. @ubergrits, as the original owner, confirmed that the hitch receiver was primarily used for a bike rack, and he expressed regret over selling it due to infrequent usage. Additionally, @GMNAO pointed out that while the car's value might take a hit due to the repair history, the transparency is commendable.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @RJ80 and @GageDave regarding the timing chain tensioner, a known issue for these vehicles, with @RJ80 suggesting that it is crucial to have it checked for prospective buyers. @SteveSylvester asked for clarification on how repairs were performed after the accident, indicating some wariness. Moreover, @davidhunternyc expressed disappointment at the lack of a sunroof, which reflects personal preference, while @Classichondaman warned about potential expensive maintenance issues that can arise, particularly with the timing chain tensioner.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @WittyWook (The Seller) expresses a positive outlook about the auction, inviting potential buyers to ask questions and request photos or videos to facilitate their decision-making process. This openness indicates a level of confidence in the vehicle's condition and an eagerness to engage with potential buyers. The assurance of being available throughout the auction suggests good customer service and support from the seller, contributing positively to the auction environment.
Neutral: Comments from @NPB ask clarifying questions regarding the vehicle's features and condition, such as the absence of a heater, window enclosures, and whether it has been in water. These inquiries indicate a level of due diligence and interest from potential buyers, but they do not express strong opinions or sentiments about the vehicle. @WittyWook's responses to these queries provide factual information regarding the vehicle's specifications and maintenance history, maintaining a neutral tone in the discussion.
Negative: @NPB raises concerns about the vehicle's lack of windshields and the presence of a hole in the plastic, which could suggest potential issues for buyers looking for a complete or fully functional vehicle. While @WittyWook provides clarification about the configuration and maintenance of the vehicle, the absence of key features like a windshield could deter some buyers, reflecting a negative concern about its usability in different weather conditions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's condition, particularly praising aspects like the cleanliness of the undercarriage and the overall aesthetic appeal. @Tea_Yota, the seller, highlights that this Lexus SUV is the cleanest he's encountered, mentioning the impressive condition of the paint and undercarriage which looks almost new. @OBS2907 concurs, emphasizing that the vehicle appears garage-kept and has zero surface rust, suggesting it has been well-cared for and likely not exposed to harsh conditions. @micahweedman remarks on the good looks of the vehicle and how it seems to be in the prime phase of use, further suggesting a positive outlook towards its longevity and performance.
Neutral: Several comments are focused on inquiries about the vehicle's history and specific features rather than expressing clear favor or disfavor. @Sweli raises questions about the vehicle's maintenance history after 2018, as there seems to be a gap before it was titled in Montana. @Pasicale also inquires about the vehicle's condition, asking for clarifications on potential paint defects and the timing belt replacement. @Jerrysmalley asks about the cold start pumps and the shocks' condition, indicating an interest in understanding the vehicle's mechanical state. Additionally, there are comments discussing the typical costs of oil changes which reflects a more factual perspective rather than an emotional response to the vehicle.
Negative: There are a few minor concerns raised about the vehicle, mostly revolving around the documentation and physical imperfections. @Pasicale points out a possible paint defect and seeks clarification on some smudges and scratches visible in various pictures. Meanwhile, @IV1999 questions discoloration in front of the vehicle, hinting at potential red flags despite the overall positive remarks. @SaintJavelin expresses curiosity about how the vehicle's underside could remain in such pristine condition considering its history in an area that typically uses salt on roads, implying skepticism. Overall, these comments suggest some apprehension that potential buyers might have regarding the vehicle's aesthetics and history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mikeor remarked on the appealing appearance of the Spitfire in the garage, suggesting it is a well-presented vehicle. @Tom_S. expressed admiration, noting that the car looks particularly attractive with the factory hardtop. @dherr2 commented positively on the car's aesthetics and commented that any 1979-1980 Spitfire should consider replacing the bumpers for improved looks, reflecting satisfaction with its current design. Additionally, @Drivershades described this Spitfire as the nicest they have seen in years, further underscoring the car's visual appeal. The seller, @QMS, also appreciated the interactions and questions received from potential buyers, indicating a supportive selling environment.
Neutral: The seller, @QMS, has provided various details about the vehicle and its auction process, inviting potential bidders to contact them for inspections and live walkarounds. They outlined significant maintenance and improvements made to the car from 2011 to 2023, which included replacements of critical components like the engine and brake calipers, reflecting ongoing care for the vehicle. @Barryward refuted criticism by asserting their affection for the Spitfire, while @bipeman pointed out a discrepancy regarding the wheel size, indicating some clarification is needed. @krgtvw11 and @Skegeevette inquired about additional content like driving videos and photos with the top off, showing ongoing interest but also indicating limitations in current representations.
Negative: Some comments highlighted areas of concern about the vehicle's condition, such as @ptegler mentioning a bummer about the dashboard and some cracks, suggesting a need for attention despite the vehicle being generally well-maintained. @SimonBL pointed out a rusted bracket issue, questioning its structural integrity, while @bru212 asked about the availability of accessories like a soft top frame and tonneau cover, which may affect the completeness of the sale. This indicates that while the Spitfire has many positives, there are aspects that need further scrutiny, indicating potential buyers should approach with caution regarding these details.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments on the vehicle are overwhelmingly positive, with multiple users praising its beauty and the seller's dedication to maintenance. @JSpych described the car as 'Beautiful!' and noted that the seller, @gweaver, is meticulous about E38 maintenance, indicating that this vehicle will be a good investment for the new owner. @halrod1 called it 'spectacular' and envisioned it in beautiful locations, showing a strong appreciation for its aesthetics. Additionally, @KevinH reminisced about a previous model's unique color, emphasizing the attraction such colors bring to these cars. Many commenters expressed that they would love to own the car, highlighting its appeal as a well-sorted and lovingly maintained vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters were curious about specific features and maintenance details of the car. @Dale750 asked about the sound system and if any modifications were made, while @TomSgarlata inquired about the master cylinder, reflecting a desire for reassurance regarding functionality. Additionally, @JSpych opened a discussion about the car's condition and any remaining work, indicating a thoughtful consideration of its purchase. @gweaver (the seller) actively engaged with questions, demonstrating transparency and a willingness to address potential buyers' concerns. This indicates a level of trust and acknowledgment of the car's history and maintenance requirements, showcasing a community eager to share knowledge about the E38.
Negative: While most comments were positive, some users mentioned concerns related to the vehicle's history, particularly around the timing chain guides, which are known issues with the E38 model. @BidAllWinNone noted that as a 'classic' BMW owner, issues regarding chain guides frequently linger in the back of their mind. @Nurburgringer shared their experience with crumbled guides, highlighting a common apprehension among owners. This aspect of the vehicle's history suggests that potential buyers may need to approach the purchase with consideration of possible future maintenance expenses, especially regarding older vehicles with complex histories.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's appearance and performance. @Zimster described it as a ``damn fine looking specimen`` while @mike_rockwell referred to it as a ``fun new toy from Ford,`` praising Ford for their work on the vehicle. The seller, @philchili, also articulated the quality enhancements made to the truck, comparing it to the upgraded Lariat-trim level, indicating that it offers a more special experience than the base model. @Ford512 also complimented the truck, noting its beauty and inquiring about its idle hours, signaling interest in its overall condition.
Neutral: The seller, @philchili, provided detailed information regarding the truck's maintenance, stating that an oil and filter change had recently been completed and that he would be sharing receipts and videos shortly. He mentioned an outstanding recall on the wiring harness but assured potential buyers that it would be checked prior to delivery. Multiple commenters, including @Fisherman74017, sought clarification on the truck's performance capabilities, and @philchili disclosed that Roush had reported impressive acceleration figures for the model, hinting at the vehicle's potential for spirited driving.
Negative: Despite the overall positive comments, there were concerns mentioned within the discussion. @Ford512 specifically asked about the vehicle's idle hours, indicating some skepticism regarding its usage and condition. Additionally, @philchili acknowledged the minor surface contaminant on the truck that couldn’t be easily removed, suggesting there were imperfections to be aware of. The necessity of addressing the recall also points to a lingering issue that could deter some buyers. Overall, while the positives largely overshadow the negatives, these concerns remain relevant for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters noted that the vehicle is in excellent condition, with @CamBam specifically mentioning its appearance positively. @news980 (The Seller) reassured potential buyers about the functionality of key features, confirming that the A/C is fully operational and that all controls work as they should. This response helped to alleviate concerns raised by potential buyers and presented an attentive selling approach.
Neutral: A few questions were raised by @CamBam regarding the availability of cold start or driving videos and the functionality of different features within the car. @kcohen911 inquired about financing options if he were to win the bid, indicating interest in the car but seeking additional information before making a decision. @news980 (The Seller) engaged with these inquiries, indicating a willingness to assist and provide necessary details to help potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were also highlighted, particularly by @Jonfrancis, who pointed out a broken headlight lens that should be repaired, suggesting that there are some issues that need attention despite the overall positive feedback about the car's condition. Additionally, @Calstickshift raised objections regarding the $480 documentation fee, which was later clarified by @news980 (The Seller) as being a misprint, further illustrating the confusion surrounding the vehicle's sale process. Overall, while there were some complaints, the seller's communication seemed aimed at addressing them.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Ragtopdriver finds the car beautiful and loves the color, although he expresses concerns about its past ownership. @Jwslaw shares that he purchased a similar model and considers it the best vehicle decision he's made, stating that despite some prior owners, his experience has been trouble-free aside from minor suspension work. @Valkyrja mentions that a 2001 model is great for driving and recommends the S model for its performance upgrades, while @Aeneas137 appreciates the color and notes that maintenance seems to be in order, highlighting the car's worry-free status.
Neutral: @ttocs6991 (The Seller) advertises the 2003 Porsche Boxster S, emphasizing its accident-free history, low mileage, and new tires. The seller also addresses questions about the original top and mentions previous maintenance, including the IMS bearing replacement. Several commenters, including @PorscheTeam and @kaybat, contribute to discussions about the car's performance and condition, suggesting potential service needs and commenting positively about the vehicle's features.
Negative: @SMPRFI raises concerns about possible stone chips on the hood and asks for clarification on the car's blemishes, indicating he wants to factor in future costs. @pauloncho highlights a stain on the passenger side carpet, questioning whether it's from rust or flooding, and requests a picture without carpet coverage. The seller clarifies the stain is not rust-related but a simple mark, though these inquiries reveal potential buyer apprehensions regarding the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the superb craftsmanship and aesthetic appeal of the vehicle. @jamessmithy praises Brewster for its high-quality construction, while @Ntique-lover describes the Cabriolet as the most beautiful '38 Buick, noting the impressive design. Enthusiasts like @OutOfMyElement and @boaboyoz also express admiration, with @boaboyoz calling it 'fabulous' and a 'gorgeous example' of automotive art. Similarly, @Barryward, @billyblyth, and @Dollycat3 join in lauding the car's luxurious styling, suggesting it sparks intrigue and conversation among collectors and car enthusiasts alike.
Neutral: Some comments reflect curiosity and seek clarification about specific features of the vehicle. For instance, @Ntique-lover asks about the type of cover over the driver’s area, noting the absence of images showing this feature. @Brewbuick38, presumably the seller, responds with details about the retractable top for the chauffeur’s compartment. Additionally, @yimbe discusses the history of the vehicle's custom body, expressing uncertainty regarding its origins, and seeking insights from other experts. This indicates that while the vehicle has captivated many, there remain questions about its specifics and enhancements over the years.
Negative: However, not all feedback is purely positive. @djimbe remarks on the historical context of the car, specifically addressing the practical inconveniences of the driver being exposed to the elements, echoing sentiments from @billythekiddo, who questions the logic behind such a design. Additionally, @Docbbq raises a concern about the vehicle being listed in a Rolls-Royce auction, questioning its placement among non-RR vehicles, which could imply confusion or misrepresentation surrounding the vehicle's categorization. These comments show that while the car is admired, it has sparked debate and concern among some viewers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @charliereims compliments the vehicle as a 'Beautiful 914-6!', expressing admiration for its aesthetic. @00Ddog admires the car's condition, referring to it as a 'nice driver' and appreciating its authenticity despite previous discussions about matching parts and budget constraints. @GS1100ED reminisces about riding in similar cars, praising their fantastic performance and sleeper status, and shares a nostalgic view of the vehicle's appeal even amidst teasing from others about its heritage.
Neutral: @mward inquires about the car's location and availability for inspection, seeking confirmation and details. @Longforlineup points out that previous listings had answered several questions, indicating that there is valuable information available from past discussions. @Dfort-1 (The Seller) provides insights about the vehicle's history, explaining the changes made to the engine, modifications by previous owners, and the vehicle's repainting history, stressing the importance of reviewing previous comments for potential buyers.
Negative: @Turbodoc raises concerns about the engine noise and oil leak, requesting expert opinions on potential repair costs. @whodonit questions the source of a reported belt noise and mentions the vehicle's options, hinting at possible maintenance issues. @YELLADOG expresses doubts about the originality of the car's body paint and any signs of prior damage, indicating a need for thorough inspection due to concerns over repainting and prior bodywork.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Gappy highlighted that the vehicle has a powerful 2F motor, which is a 4.2L engine that many enthusiasts appreciate. @GLCTraveler described the vehicle as a nice-looking 40, expressing interest in its condition and asking insightful questions about its specifications. @pmhalley thanked the seller for posting and noted that the vehicle appears well cared for, asking for additional cold start and driving videos to see its performance. Many commenters showed enthusiasm and shared their personal experiences with older models, such as @toy4runr85, who commented on the vehicle's exterior modifications and confirmed that the top is removable, making it practical for various conditions.
Neutral: The seller, @Blackwatch1812, responded to various inquiries about the vehicle's specifications, sharing that the vehicle was imported from Colombia. The questions raised by @GLCTraveler and others focused on the origin of the roof and modifications made prior to import, indicating that there may be some unique elements in play that pertain to this specific model. @Gappy and @Chamba engaged in discussions regarding the truck's turn signal styles and other features that might differ from standard US models, providing context that it may not be identical to typical 1977 models.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's overall condition, particularly about the rear corner windows which @Blackwatch1812 described as opaque with one being cracked, suggesting a potential need for replacement. Questions around the history of bodywork and rust treatment were posed by @Henrythewound, indicating a level of scrutiny about the vehicle's long-term maintenance that could impact its value. The seller also mentioned that he had not conducted any painting or rust treatment during his 4-5 years of ownership, which may concern potential buyers about the vehicle's maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @jbrown89 describes the vehicle as sharp and well-equipped with KR trim, suggesting it could be an excellent tow rig after some preventative work on the 6.0 engine. @testdummypilot, the seller, highlights the truck's original condition, noting it came from the original owner's estate and has been meticulously maintained, which includes a clean history according to the Carfax. The seller emphasizes that transparency is key, providing extensive documentation, including over 400 pictures and service records, to support the vehicle's exceptional condition.
Neutral: @skidoojunky raises concerns about the stock nature of the engine and requests service history, previous repair details, and information about potential bodywork done on the truck. The seller reassures @skidoojunky that the vehicle has never been modified and that the steering wheel is original. Additionally, @CorvLoverAlways questions the presence of white powdery residue in some areas and the condition of various components, to which the seller provides clarifications and offers to address shipping inquiries.
Negative: There are some hesitations from commentators such as @CorvLoverAlways, who mentions a potential concern about residue in specific areas, and @newedge116, who questions the appearance of overspray in the pictures. @Txtriathlete brings up the need for fuel filter changes alongside oil changes, indicating concerns about maintenance practices. Overall, some commenters express skepticism about the truck's history and condition, despite the seller's detailed descriptions and reassurances.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @buellwinkle expressed enthusiasm about owning the first edition of the Classic model, describing it as an amazing ride. Additionally, @lukestokes confirmed that the vehicle has heated grips that function effectively, providing a positive feature to potential buyers.
Neutral: @D90LE_001of300 inquired about the Reverse Recall Campaign and the adaptive headlight features, to which @lukestokes clarified that the campaign had not been completed and the bike lacks an adaptive headlight. @LouisXIV showed interest in understanding the Reverse Campaign, and @lukestokes provided the requested information.
Negative: @D90LE_001of300 raised concerns regarding the Reverse Recall Campaign's status and whether the bike was equipped with important features like the adaptive headlight, highlighting a potential negative aspect for those focused on these updates. The lack of completion for the reverse campaign may suggest underlying issues that could deter potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments portray an overall positive reception of the vehicle, especially highlighting its reliability after significant modifications. @ATX1970 commented on their admiration for the Defender's appearance, particularly the livery, and appreciated its potential utility around a marina. @palinckx (The Seller) was also praised for the transparency regarding the modifications and the vehicle's history, demonstrating a commitment to providing potential buyers with comprehensive details. The enhancements, including engine and transmission upgrades, as well as the new tires, received recognition for improving its performance.
Neutral: Several comments posed questions regarding the functionality and modifications of the vehicle. Both @WAGONBOYTD and @Moshikole sought clarification on seating arrangements and the reasoning behind the engine swap. @Cranpond inquired about the issues with the gauges, suggesting an interest in understanding the vehicle's condition better. @2hecknback also added supportive comments regarding the potential for adding rear seats and enhancing its features for a beach or bush outing, highlighting the vehicle's versatility without passing judgment.
Negative: However, there were some concerns raised about the vehicle's condition, with @Cranpond questioning the functionality of the gauges and observing potential issues in the footage. @WAGONBOYTD expressed skepticism about the engine conversion given the potential reliability of the original EFI. @palinckx acknowledged existing flaws, such as the questionable paint job and the presence of surface rust, which he transparently discussed, but some users seemed wary about these issues. Overall, while the vehicle has appeal, the comments reflect some reservations about its current state and modifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed interest in the vehicle, suggesting that it could be a worthy investment for restoration. @JamesEdwinStarr noted the presence of hard-to-source features such as locking t-tops and the original air intake scoop, hinting at its potential value for a full restoration. @USAF_TRobertson mentioned being tempted to purchase the vehicle due to its local availability, indicating a desire to save it despite concerns over its history. Additionally, there were comments on its rarity, with @problemchildauto pointing out that it's a litmus test for market demand, and others confirming that similar models have recently sold for higher prices, adding to the allure of this vehicle.
Neutral: Comments included inquiries about the vehicle's history and specific details. @Agonza and @Josephmarq asked for more information regarding the accident and damage history noted in the Carfax report, highlighting concerns about the vehicle's past. @Dtorre (The Seller) responded to these queries, affirming that they were unaware of the incident prior to obtaining the vehicle and providing details about the ownership and key configuration. The discussions also covered the features of the car, with @JamesEdwinStarr seeking clarity about the keys and remote functionalities, indicating a shared knowledge and interest among the community.
Negative: Some commenters raised alarm over the vehicle's troubled history, with @Agonza expressing concern that the vehicle has had a "rough life" due to its past accident and theft. @Josephmarq noted the need for significant body work and painting, suggesting extensive damage from the years it had been exposed to the elements. Additionally, there were doubts about the vehicle's value recovery, with @USAF_TRobertson wondering if investments put into repairs would ever be compensated by the vehicle's market value. Commenters like @WranglerX even questioned the feasibility of bidding for the vehicle, reflecting skepticism about its restoration potential versus simply keeping it as a hot rod.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters are enthusiastic about the vehicle's appearance and quality. @boaboyoz described the Defender 110's Miami Blue color as 'dynamite' and complimented its lovely build, while @Noyac40 expressed admiration for its overall aesthetics, particularly noting the wheels. @apester4u conveyed strong desire for the vehicle, stating it is 'ridiculously cool' and appealing, indicating a positive reception from many users who find the car visually striking and well-designed.
Neutral: Various questions and clarifications were raised by potential buyers regarding the vehicle's features and specifications. @Oliphant inquired about the availability of rear seat belts, which @forzagrayton (The Seller) confirmed would be provided for the buyer to install. Other inquiries included a request for details about the vehicle's drive system from @broodie, who was informed by @forzagrayton that power is managed through a five-speed manual transmission and a dual-range transfer case, maintaining a focus on factual information rather than emotional response.
Negative: Some comments indicated concerns regarding the vehicle's functionality and comfort. @jbeesl28277 asked about the presence of air conditioning, to which @forzagrayton replied negatively, noting that there is no A/C, which could be a downside for potential buyers in hot climates. Additionally, there was a question from @LeosKeys regarding the attachment of the black rollbar, hinting at possible concerns about the vehicle's structural design.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GoldenJimbo007 mentions owning a 2012 RT since February 2015 and describes it as still running like a top, portraying a positive ownership experience. @Collectibleclassics, the seller, emphasizes their role in providing unique and desirable vehicles and highlights their commitment to smooth and transparent transactions, which has earned them a high Google review score of 4.9 out of 5. This reflects positively on their reputation and customer service practices, inviting potential buyers to visit or reach out for more information.
Neutral: @0351antitanK inquires about the horsepower of the Charger, suggesting an interest in performance specifications. @kowkid asks specific questions about features like cruise control types and cylinder deactivation, indicating potential buyers are interested in performance and efficiency details. The comments illustrate a general curiosity about the vehicle's attributes without expressing strong opinions either way.
Negative: @polsonGriz raises concerns about an open recall for airbags mentioned in the Carfax report, questioning whether it has been addressed, which may discourage potential buyers from proceeding without clarification. The inquiry about oil change specifications from @GoldenJimbo007 also implies a concern regarding maintenance practices, while @polsonGriz's follow-up on horsepower adds to a sense of uncertainty about critical specifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm and satisfaction regarding the vehicle, particularly highlighting its performance and appearance. @ImJustSayin praised the 2020 GT350 as an excellent track car, noting how well it performs and how it is a joy to drive. @laconic10 also remarked positively on the car’s looks, stating 'It looks great!' Furthermore, @hegrunt (The Seller) shared updates about enhancements made to the vehicle, including the addition of hood struts, a metal coolant reservoir, and personal touches like painting the engine strut brace.
Neutral: A few inquiries were made regarding the specifics of the vehicle, reflecting a neutral interest among potential buyers. @Becauseracecar asked whether the owner's kit would be included with the purchase, and @BJD1969 requested information about the window sticker. @laconic10 inquired about the absence of a standard spare tire and was informed that a temporary mobility kit is provided instead. Furthermore, @5Net4 sought clarification about the ownership history recorded on Carfax, as it showed two owners instead of one, indicating a potential confusion about the vehicle's title history.
Negative: There were not many negative comments, but some concerns were raised that might affect potential buyers. @slotracer wanted to know if the racing stripes were painted or applied as stickers, revealing a potential hesitation about the car's aesthetic modifications. @Jwrd asked about warranties on the engine, hinting at uncertainty regarding the vehicle's coverage. Additionally, the absence of a clear bra was noted by @laconic10, which might concern buyers looking for added protection on high-value cars.
![]() |
2017 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 3500 Midwest Automotive Designs Business Class
WDAPF1CD3HP565091
Lot 202023
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @EstateMgmtLife expressed admiration for the vehicle's build quality, noting it as a "truly stunning build" which reflects positively on its construction and design. @eyeball (The Seller) revealed that the van was originally custom ordered for a reputable auto group and later used for personal family transport, implying a level of care and quality in its history. Additionally, @eyeball confirmed that all major components such as the AC, lighting, and fridge are functioning properly, which is an important aspect for potential buyers.
Neutral: @PolskiKris inquired about the cargo area and total seating, showing practical interest in the vehicle's specifications. The seller promptly responded with details about the seating capacity and promised to provide photos of the cargo area, illustrating a willingness to answer questions and be transparent about the van's features. @StealsWheels asked about the internet setup in the vehicle, indicating that potential buyers are considering modern conveniences in their assessment.
Negative: @TPraceman raised concerns about the state of the vehicle's electronics, pointing out that they appeared to be rough and suggested the need for replacements. Furthermore, there were queries regarding maintenance, as TPraceman noted that the last service was recorded in 2022. Despite the positive assurances from the seller regarding the functionality of the vehicle's systems, such concerns point to potential maintenance issues that may need attention.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @evh1 described the vehicle as "Gorgeous and Bad to the Bone," expressing enthusiasm for the nighttime shots included in the listing. @peckautogroup emphasized the reliability of the Holley Electronic Fuel Injection, confirming it is the Sniper 1 system which offers turn-key reliability. The diamond plate used throughout the vehicle not only enhances its rugged aesthetic but also contributes to durability and functionality by reducing road noise, a point acknowledged by @peckautogroup with thanks for @evh1’s insight.
Neutral: Comments from @mbanens and @peckautogroup indicate curiosity about the vehicle's features, such as the ability to remove the roof for a 'topless' experience, which @peckautogroup confirmed can be done with ease. Additionally, the seller mentioned the desirable Dana 20 transfer case, recognized as a robust and reliable unit suitable for various uses including moderate off-roading, providing context for its performance capabilities. @peckautogroup also shared that additional underside photos are available, reinforcing the vehicle’s readiness for use.
Negative: While most comments were positive or neutral, @KTDreemz made a lighthearted remark about the large amount of diamond plating, suggesting they hope it brings "diamonds in return," which could imply a concern regarding potential over-embellishment. The concerns were not directly negative but raised an interesting perspective about the vehicle's design choices. Overall, the discussions were largely focused on the vehicle's features and aesthetics, with little in the way of criticism.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @OldGuy noted the vehicle's unique features and cool build, expressing good luck with the auction. @Sumser commented on the vehicle's cleanliness and sharp build, applauding the craftsmanship. @Twosaun described the bike as beautiful, unique, and fun, mentioning they had seen it in person, which indicates a positive firsthand experience.
Neutral: @formulamotorrad (The Seller) engaged with various commenters, thanking them for their bids and expressing his availability to answer questions during the auction. He shared a personal touch by mentioning a film camera shot of the bike taken during a trip from California to Oregon after completing an engine rebuild. The Seller appeared approachable and open to interaction with potential buyers.
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @davisjrjr believes these bikes are as good as any Harley sells today, praising their timeless look. @Shadydeal101, who owns the same model, highlights the bike's incredible ride, power, and handling, calling it the best Harley Davidson ever made.
Neutral: @buttesilverbow comments on the V-Rod season, indicating a trend of people purchasing these bikes and keeping them stored away. @newfiebullet reminisces about an auction they attended where a V-Rod was sold still in the box, which adds to the allure of the bike's value.
Negative: @rlikis inquires about the Gold Key option, indicating a potential disappointment that this specific model does not include it, although it still appears to be of high quality. @911r (The Seller) clarifies that while this bike is not a gold key option, it does come with initial purchase accessories and is in excellent condition, which may not fully address @rlikis's concern.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the vehicle's appealing attributes, with @bill930p stating, "This car drives as good as it looks. And it looks fantastic!" Additionally, I will include new brakes in the sale, indicating a commitment to ensuring the car is in good condition for the buyer. @thedriven also received prompt responses regarding the tires, noting they are nearly new with 90% tread left, and the top is in good condition with no leaks.
Neutral: Some discussions revolved around the service history and maintenance of the vehicle. @septicore asked about the second 40K service and questioned gaps in the service records. @bill930p acknowledged the records are incomplete but offered to perform any desired maintenance on the vehicle at his cost before delivery. @gadget212 inquired about bore scoring, to which @bill930p responded that there were no symptoms present, though no inspection had been done.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's history and condition, including a point raised by @diamondsforever about excessive shaking and vibrations from the suspension, which may have been attributed to the camera mount instead. The history of service intervals also raised questions, with @septicore noting discrepancies in mileage records from previous services compared to the current mileage. Overall, while the seller provided assurances, the potential lack of complete service records and some inconsistencies left doubts for some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Rod67 described the vehicle as 'very cool,' while @PwrWgn praised it for its appearance and predicted it to be a fun driving experience. Owner @llg86 chimed in, sharing that after owning the car for four years, it remained an absolute blast to drive and compared the thrill of it to flying without leaving the ground, evoking strong enthusiasm about its performance and excitement.
Neutral: @Sup57 inquired about the vehicle's miles per gallon and highway handling, which @Pdigwig clarified by sharing that real-world testing indicated a combined fuel mileage of 33 mpg. @eldonchas noted the car's standard paint job and mentioned a book that could help potential buyers understand the vehicle's history and evolution better. @MotorManToo advised connecting to the TalkMorgan forum for further information and insights about the K3W.
Negative: @sainthoo provided a somewhat critical perspective by recalling the car's lack of a dead pedal for the left foot and reflecting on the challenges of driving it in traffic due to its low seating position. @guymichaelparks raised concerns about the age of the tires and oil change services, highlighting considerations that potential buyers may need to address.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express excitement about the vehicle, particularly appreciating its color, with @johnnyschelaq stating it is their favorite. @sevenshortagrand highlights it as a rare example of the CR Deletes with notably low mileage, categorizing it as beautiful. @Louiev77 describes it as the ultimate driving machine, while numerous others vocalize their hopes for the car to find a good owner who will drive it instead of stashing it away. The seller, @discodale, provides reassurance about the car's condition, indicating it has no paintwork or bodywork done in the 14 years of ownership and has been well-maintained.
Neutral: Some comments revolve around requests for additional information, such as @ZeusBearThor asking for a paint meter check and @kennyschachter inquiring about service receipts and potential rust. @mleppy expresses interest in viewing the car, and there is a general dialogue about the vehicle's history and production details. @VTys2k engages with @sevenshortagrand to understand the source of the mileage statistics. Discussions also reflect on past pricing for the car, with @Chene91 noting their astonishment at the current value compared to years prior. Overall, many users are engaged in a learning and inquiry process regarding the car's specifics and history.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters express concerns about the car's usability given the lack of A/C and stereo, particularly in warm climates. @Davew articulates that this could limit the car's practicality for everyday driving, suggesting that its low mileage may be due to such inconveniences. @Chene91 raises the concern of surface rust inquiring about maintenance documentation, while @1996SupraTT also questions the availability of similar records. There is apprehension among certain users regarding the future of the car, fearing it might become overly speculative or a trophy piece rather than being driven as intended.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dan_1981 expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, stating 'Wow!!' which indicates excitement and admiration. Other users like @geb12872 praised this specific model for being the best and most reliable car they ever owned, sharing fond memories of their experiences with the car. @henryakahank's inquiry about the headlights led to clarification from @Mcfly1985, the seller, about the originality of the headlights, helping preserve the integrity of the vehicle's features.
Neutral: Several participants provided neutral inquiries and observations. For instance, @Victory805 asked about potential driving videos, showing interest in the vehicle's operational aspects. @Unit701 inquired about the repaint process and whether specific components were removed, demonstrating curiosity without expressing strong sentiment. @4dberdz asked about various mechanical conditions and services performed on the vehicle, which suggests an analytical appraisal rather than a personal opinion.
Negative: A few comments pointed out minor criticisms regarding the presentation of the vehicle. @VerbalDiarrhea noted issues with photography quality, suggesting that the lack of focus made it difficult to inspect the paintwork. There was also concern from @Victory805 regarding the lack of recent usage and limited details on the carfax, which may imply potential underlying issues. Additionally, @JLKP131120 sought clarification regarding the vehicle's air conditioning status, while @Victory805 referred to concerns about possible rust on the vehicle, indicating doubts about its condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered positive feedback with comments such as those from @Icebiker, who appreciates the aesthetic of the Richland Forged 20’s, likening them to the stock 19" 437's while praising their appearance. @Dabestout expressed excitement over the car's striking jet black color, suggesting it has a visually appealing presence on the road.
Neutral: The Seller, @cryptz, has provided detailed information about the car, including its current mileage, modifications, and features. They clarified the status of the check engine light, indicating it is not on under normal operating conditions and that all modifications have been documented, including LED changes and performance tuning. The interactions also included requests for a cold start video and information about the LED installations and their compatibility with brightness adjustments, showing the buyer's interest in specific vehicle details.
Negative: Concerns were raised by users like @Shabeeh, who questioned if the engine light was operational due to what appeared in a video. The apprehensions indicate a level of distrust that may stem from the visual impression given in the videos. Additionally, comments from @mmhoss imply negative implications regarding the vehicle's performance, referencing a "sonic blast" incident, which might suggest some underlying reliability issues that potential buyers may want to investigate further.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @willwill appreciates the aesthetic and driving dynamics of the vehicle, mentioning that maintenance issues are typical for any car with similar mileage. They noted successfully replacing various gaskets and preventive maintenance to keep their vehicle leak-free and enjoyable. @nbibeau highlights their positive ownership experience with the e90, praising its weight distribution and driving engagement, asserting that it remains a favorite compared to various other brands they have owned.
Neutral: @benhamine7 acknowledges that the N52 engine is reliable but emphasizes the need for maintenance specific to BMWs. They argue that while some Toyota models may lacks in driving dynamics compared to the BMW, preventive care can mitigate most issues that arise with age and use. Other users, including @cj11, provide neutral insights on the maintenance challenges associated with older BMWs, mentioning the plastic components that can develop issues but reinforce the idea that with proper maintenance, the cars can remain functional and enjoyable.
Negative: @2002WS6 expresses dissatisfaction with the vehicle, citing excessive plastic and mechanical issues such as oil leaks that have arisen in their experience. They regret their purchase and advocate for older models with more robust materials. They engaged in a back-and-forth with other users about the reliability of the engine and materials, suggesting that modern versions have made cost-cutting decisions that diminish quality. The sentiment here reflects a broader concern over the long-term durability of newer BMW models compared to those manufactured earlier.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the dark blue Daihatsu dump truck as adorable and clearly finds it appealing, expressing enthusiasm with emojis. @jacksnothere expressed love for the truck and the potential use for his farm, indicating that the truck meets his needs well. @acquire, who has bought two trucks from the seller, praised the seller for honestly describing the vehicles and for having easy transactions, appreciating the functionality of the truck with comments on the air conditioning and removable bed gate.
Neutral: @Zolfo asked for the bed dimensions and hauling capacity, showing interest in the truck without expressing strong feelings either positively or negatively. @TopEndTrap inquired about the 0-60 times, demonstrating curiosity regarding the truck's performance without any strong bias. @Glenn930 requested information about the maximum load rating, indicating a need for more technical specifications about the vehicle.
Negative: @Jacksnothere raised a point about the recent Maryland historic tag laws that could limit the truck's use, which may be concerning for potential buyers in that state. @tvonderharr asked whether the odometer reading was accurate, suggesting a level of skepticism about the vehicle's true mileage. @John_in_DC questioned the availability of parts for Daihatsus compared to Hondas and Mitsus, which indicates a concern about maintainability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments praise the vehicle's reliability and value. @saddlesore mentions their positive experience with a similar bike, highlighting its durability with over 200,000 miles. They express interest in the auction and request a start and driving video, indicating confidence in the vehicle's performance. @Ychaz53 (The Seller) responds positively, confirming that the bike has been well maintained and includes additional accessories like a battery charger and repair manual, which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: @Ychaz53 (The Seller) provides detailed information about the last service performed in April 2024, including an oil change, brake system maintenance, and confirmation that the ABS is functioning correctly. They also address specific inquiries about the bike's tire date codes and any additional equipment offered with the purchase. This information appears practical and aids potential buyers in making informed decisions without displaying strong sentiments emotionally.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding potential issues with the bike, particularly regarding engine noise. @whilst asks about a rattling sound observed after starting, while @bbrads offers a more detailed technical explanation indicating that the noise may be related to throttle body issues. @willy questions the absence of a visible headlight switch, suggesting a possible oversight in functionality, which may lead to doubts about the bike's condition for some buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Ctags19 (The Seller) provided helpful responses to questions raised by @PineIslandPorsche and @visotsky regarding the vehicle's condition, confirming that the corrosion is all surface-level and that the smoke observed during the cold start is likely just condensation. The seller also assured that all functionalities including the air suspension and various electronic features operate correctly, reinforcing confidence in the vehicle's overall reliability. @Ctags19 stated that the car had always been garage-kept, which adds to its appeal by suggesting it has been well maintained.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Visotsky and @ctward17, asked for details about the service history, repairs, and functionality of various systems within the vehicle. @Ctags19 (The Seller) mentioned the lack of complete service records but highlighted that most maintenance was performed at a Land Rover dealer and that all major functions are operational. Comments from @Mrhoppy suggested that the dealership could provide service history, pointing towards some attention to the vehicle's maintenance background while recognizing the potential limitations about service records.
Negative: There were concerns raised by users such as @Nolift911 and @WAGONBOYTD regarding the vehicle's undercarriage rust, with @Nolift911 mentioning that the issues related to timing chains could be costly if repairs are needed. @WAGONBOYTD specifically noted that the rust might be more extensive than visible and indicated that high exhaust smoke could signal more serious issues. The worry about fluid leaks emerged, although @Ctags19 assured that there are no leaks, emphasizing the need for potential buyers to be vigilant and perhaps conduct a thorough inspection.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Davidch1974, the seller, mentioned that the truck runs good and everything works, stating that there has been more work done to it recently. He assures potential buyers that the body is in really good condition despite normal undercarriage rust for its age, which many buyers appreciate. @CoopCity expressed initial interest in the vehicle and is looking for transparency on the seller's decision to sell the truck shortly after acquiring it, indicating a positive engagement with the seller.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Thereddevil and @Molae65, inquired about the technical aspects of the vehicle. @UscPhd97_ asked about the air conditioning system and tire wear, while @Molae65 sought clarification on the reasoning behind the installation of steering stabilizers on the truck. These questions suggest a neutral stance, as potential buyers are looking for specific information without implying strong opinions.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Bobzluvsoldcars about potential leaks and issues highlighted in a service invoice, questioning whether those repairs had been made since January. Additionally, @tootle commented on the mention of 'lots of rust' in the undercarriage, raising fears about the vehicle's overall condition. @Bigfitter also pointed out the need for replacement of a corroded oil pan, suggesting the vehicle may have hidden deficiencies that could deter some buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered numerous positive remarks highlighting its beauty and performance. @Caymanorcarrera notes its stunning visual appeal and the practicality of its jump seats, labeling it a great rally car. @psg559 admires the unique color of the XK, while @V12LUV recalls fond memories of driving it through Japan, where it must have attracted many admirers. The vehicle is described as a thoroughly sorted example, ready to enjoy with modern upgrades that enhance driving dynamics, making it a joy to operate, as emphasized by both the seller and other enthusiasts like @M3_Driver and @Capt._Doug.
Neutral: Several comments address specifics about the vehicle's condition and capabilities, indicating a desire for clarity. @kevindhamilton requests current photos and information regarding the title following a collision repair, with the seller, @justinbsc, confirming the car's title is clear. Concerns were raised about the air conditioning's performance and the need for further details about paint flaws noted by @M3_Driver. Additionally, @JBGFD inquired about the functionality of the wipers, indicating the importance of even minor details in the vehicle's inspection process.
Negative: Some participants raised concerns about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding cosmetic flaws and function. @M3_Driver pointed out potential paint issues and questioned the appearance of the driver door gap in images. Others like @VroomForTwo and @JBGFD sought information on the vehicle's air conditioning performance and wiper functionality for safety reasons. @M3_Driver stressed the need for transparency about the car's history and the extent of any modern modifications, indicating a cautious approach towards potential buyers regarding the vehicle's overall integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express a genuine appreciation for the vehicle's charm and fun driving experience. @Shaank94 (The Seller) highlights the joy of driving the Jeep TJ, noting its lightness and agility despite the 2.4L engine. @mspaulding88 describes it as a simple and clean Jeep, while @Bartruff1 emphasizes that the TJ represents the last of the authentic Jeeps, cherished for their exploratory capabilities in various terrains. Overall, the vehicle is praised for its nostalgic aspect and simplicity, with references to its potential as a playful beach cruiser.
Neutral: Comments reflect a general curiosity about the vehicle's reliability and mechanical features, particularly regarding the engine types. @James_MA inquires about the generation's reliability, to which @Shaank94 (The Seller) reassures that both the 4.0L and 2.4L engines are reliable options. There is also a discussion about towing capabilities, with @madman_5117 acknowledging the manual's towing capacity, although expressing skepticism. Several users ask for specific photos to assess the vehicle's condition further, indicating an interest in its functionality and maintenance.
Negative: Some critical comments highlight potential shortcomings of the vehicle. @mussberger mentions that the TJ can be underwhelming on the freeway and points out that it might be the only car sold in the USA without standard AC in 2006, suggesting it may lack some modern conveniences. @Enzo.Ferrari humorously critiques the half-door design, illustrating the frustrations of operating them during inclement weather. Additionally, @lucky12345678910 expresses disappointment over the absence of the more powerful 4.0L six-cylinder engine, indicating that with this engine, the vehicle would fetch a significantly higher price.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters generally expressed excitement about the vehicle, with @boaboyoz praising it as a "tremendous Texan H1 Alpha Wagon". @geb12872 exclaimed "WOWSERS!!!!!!!", indicating strong enthusiasm. The seller, @BlueChipCar, provided reassuring information about the truck's mechanical condition, emphasizing its performance capabilities, and noting that it has been well-maintained, with upgrades such as the Garrett turbocharger and an impressive revamp under the EVS Search & Destroy package.
Neutral: Several commenters requested more information and transparency regarding the truck's history and functionality. @Celticcross inquired about the AC system, while @dhitchon10 asked about the condition of accessories and tracking of service history. @collinsdr1 sought clarification on the type of finish, potential missing paint, and the actual mileage noted on the Carfax report, which sparked discussions about the truck's documentation and improvements made over time.
Negative: Concerns were raised primarily about the vehicle's mileage history and potential lack of maintenance documentation. @BOOOM questioned the authenticity of the mileage due to indications of a rollback, while @Ignoramoose highlighted the need for comprehensive servicing records, especially following upgrades. Additionally, @FerrariMikeF355 pointed out worries surrounding potential exposed wiring and issues with light bars, indicating a sense of unease about the truck's condition despite its robust performance claims from the seller.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle for its rarity and beauty, noting it as a stunning example of the 123GT, particularly highlighting that it is one of approximately 250 Canadian models made, with only around 40 still existing today, as mentioned by @Hayden_knorr. @Dollycat3 expressed admiration by calling it a 'gorgeous rare 123GT', and @LOdug remarked on its driving experience, stating, 'I bet this drives great!'. @Keith_Price complimented the seller, describing them as an enthusiast and gentleman, while @BluesDJ remarked that it is a well-presented example of a 123GT, emphasizing its desirability despite not being completely original.
Neutral: Comments regarding the specifics of the vehicle's components, modifications, and accessories were plentiful. @alaskossie questioned the absence of certain original accessories like the fender-mounted mirrors and fog lights, to which @Hayden_knorr clarified that these were not standard for Canadian models. Additionally, there were discussions about modifications such as the brake master cylinder, which appears to be an upgrade from American models, as pointed out by @MargotDrive and confirmed by @Hayden_knorr. Commenters also discussed aspects of the tachometer, suggesting that it may not be original to the car, while others noted the preserved patina of the badges and the condition of the rubber floor covering.
Negative: Some comments pointed to potential issues or areas of concern regarding the vehicle's authenticity and condition. @northNH mentioned an 'incorrect crankcase ventilation plumbing', and @mike_rockwell criticized the visual impact of the mud flaps, calling them distracting. Additionally, @87033x6 raised questions about the battery's fit within its box, suggesting that it seemed designed for 6-volt batteries. Concerns were also shared about the potential absence of a limited slip differential (LSD), with @130220 and @Hayden_knorr discussing how to verify if the rear end featured LSD and why it was a significant attribute for Canadian 123GTs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @kconnor123 called it a sweet ride that looks like a burnout machine and expressed anticipation for the sound of it running. @mark_99 described the vehicle as a 'Mean Machine' and suggested additional lettering could enhance its appeal. @djimbe acknowledged that while the car isn’t exactly his style, he found it well done with a particularly striking green color. @zach3020 (The Seller) engaged positively with potential buyers, promising to upload videos and reply to comments as much as possible.
Neutral: Comments from @zach3020 (The Seller) provided specific information requested by users, such as the tire sizes and details about the rear end gear ratio, which @Brian52 found necessary. @zach3020 stated that there would be no hood for the vehicle, siding with @mark_99’s playful comment about hoods being for wimps. Other users like @Habu2 expressed appreciation for the information shared, indicating a level of engagement and communication from the seller.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @moremoney2 about the car's safety, questioning the quality of welding and stating that the welds seemed dangerous. @Brian52's inquiries about engine specifications highlighted a perceived lack of detailed information about the engine and components, which could deter potential buyers. @rocksteady expressed frustration regarding the fuel cell access, asking for clarification on how to fill it, indicating possible usability issues with the car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @A7534 praised the vehicle for its perfect and typically German color combination, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @Sixtysixragtop also noted that the car is beautiful, further emphasizing its visual attractiveness. Additionally, @cvmohr mentioned that the seller has a great reputation for servicing Mercedes Benz cars of this vintage, suggesting confidence in the vehicle's quality and the seller's credibility.
Neutral: @Brett_S (The Seller) provided detailed responses to inquiries regarding the vehicle's features and functionality. He confirmed that the car runs and drives beautifully, with a functioning AC system that blows cold air. The seller addressed questions about the door locking system, indicating that while the master key works for various locks, the passenger door lock is frozen. He also advised that the car has not been in a major accident and that detailed photographs have been posted to show its condition, although Carfax history is limited due to the vehicle's age.
Negative: @diamondsforever expressed various concerns about the vehicle, including the lack of Carfax history and questions about its ownership history and accident involvement. This user questioned the functionality of the door locking system and the status of the odometer, expressing skepticism about the car's mileage. Despite the seller's attempts to reassure @diamondsforever about the car's condition and the seller's history, @diamondsforever persisted with doubts, leading to comments being flagged as non-constructive by other users.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Rlr00597 (The Seller) describes the SL65 AMG as an "absolute monster" and expresses pleasure in owning the vehicle, indicating that it has been a joy to drive. They show willingness to provide assistance to potential buyers by being available for questions and inspections, highlighting a commitment to transparency and customer service. The Seller offers to provide additional pictures or videos upon request, ensuring that interested parties have access to ample information about the car's condition, which is appreciated.
Neutral: The seller addresses specific inquiries from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and condition. @Dustinspiveyfsu raises concerns about oil spray and the state of the radio/navigation unit, both of which @Rlr00597 responds to with detailed explanations. They clarify that past issues with the secondary air injection system have been resolved and that any previously noted seepage from the strut has not recurred during their ownership. The mention of a Bluetooth FM transmitter suggests that the seller has found a workaround for the CD player issue, reflecting adaptability.
Negative: @Jordy88 criticizes the decision by Mercedes-Benz to equip the vehicle with a V12 engine in a two-seat convertible, expressing disappointment with that design choice. This skepticism hints at concerns some buyers might have regarding the practicality of the vehicle. Additionally, questions raised by @Dustinspiveyfsu about potential oil leaks and the functionality of the radio/navigation system demonstrate that some prospective buyers may have reservations about the vehicle's mechanical reliability, requiring reassurance from the seller.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bustedsprocket (The Seller) expressed excitement about listing the beautiful C5 Corvette and mentioned that it has recently been thoroughly checked and repaired by a mechanic, indicating it's ready to drive. @Bustedsprocket also described the enjoyment of driving the car and how it sounds amazing on the roads in the Cleveland area, particularly with the top off on nice days. Furthermore, potential buyers appreciated the car's fantastic appearance and acknowledged that C5 Corvettes are special vehicles.
Neutral: Several comments were focused on the vehicle's specifications, including queries about the exhaust and any modifications. @clints71 asked about the car's exhaust system and whether the harmonic balancer had been replaced, to which @Bustedsprocket confirmed it was replaced in 2015. Additionally, @svxride inquired about the exhaust noise while driving at highway speeds, with @Bustedsprocket providing insights into the car's performance at different speed limits and noting that mufflers could be added if needed.
Negative: @RBROWN2707 expressed concerns regarding California emissions regulations, specifically about the absence of catalytic converters and how that would prevent him from purchasing the car. He highlighted that vehicles newer than 1975 do not qualify for the state exemption. In contrast, @Bustedsprocket acknowledged the strict emissions laws in California and stated how fortunate he was not to have to navigate those regulations personally. @Viper0311 mentioned he wished the car were a manual transmission, implying that the automatic version may not appeal to some enthusiasts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle, a 1965 Sunbeam MK 1 Tiger No 375, has received an overwhelming amount of praise from various commentators, particularly for its originality and pristine condition. @RSM described it as one of the purest Tigers seen in ages, while others like @Niemienator and @mikewood expressed admiration for its beauty and competitiveness in concours events. The car's remarkable history and preservation, maintained by long-term owners who avoided modifications, is highlighted by both the seller and commenters, making it a standout example in the community.
Neutral: The discussion surrounding the car also touches on its specifications and restoration process, with some commenters offering insights into its history and potential areas for correction. @austinhealer pointed out minor discrepancies regarding the car's originality, such as certain rivets and fluid specifications. Meanwhile, others discussed the specifications of the tires and historical context about the vehicle's build process, emphasizing that in concours environments, the focus on authenticity can vary significantly among collectors.
Negative: However, not all feedback was entirely positive; some comments indicated concerns regarding certain aspects of the restoration. @walkertom questioned the attention to the undercarriage details and rust prevention, highlighting that a thorough focus on such areas is crucial for the long-term integrity of British convertibles. @Sunbeamdon and @TigerGary also discussed minor discrepancies in the bumper alignment, suggesting that while the vehicle is exceptional, perfecting every detail is essential for true concours readiness.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @hectopascal referred to the vehicle as a beauty, reflecting a favorable opinion of the car's aesthetic appeal. @Bigpigman shared insights about the car's owner, highlighting that the vehicle has been well-maintained in a temperature-controlled garage and polished weekly. This adds to the perception of the Super Snake as a quality show car, suggesting it has been treated with care and is in excellent condition.
Neutral: @supersaiyan98d asked about the logistics of picking up the car or having it shipped, which shows interest in the purchasing process without a clear opinion on the vehicle itself. @NVGT350 welcomed @supersaiyan98d and provided information on the shipping options available, mentioning that the buyer would be responsible for the arrangements. This indicates a supportive community atmosphere among potential buyers and participants.
Negative: There are no negative comments or criticisms regarding the vehicle in the gathered responses. The focus remains primarily on inquiries about the car's logistics and positive descriptions of its condition and rarity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dukerunr describes the vehicle's color and presentation affirmatively, stating it's a beautiful car and wishes it good luck with the auction. @Vtec4ever appreciates the decision to keep the car's original aesthetics, particularly pointing out the absence of a cowl induction hood, which he finds pleasing. @boaboyoz similarly praises the blue Camaro and its build, expressing a casual, laid-back admiration. @NCRSmaniac echoes the sentiments about the convertible nature of the 69 Camaro, indicating it is a timeless choice, and @MPTHELACARGUY mentions the restoration quality and driving pleasure, despite the personal decision to sell.
Neutral: Several comments express a balanced view on the car's features. @BigJimInTexas notes the overall quality of the vehicle and suggests minor adjustments regarding the placement of emblems and potential suspension issues, concluding that the engine compartment appears pristine. @Menlo525N voices uncertainty regarding the white top but concedes the car's integrity overall, while @tjormes agrees about the flat hood but mentions the inconsistencies with the spoiler. @Sigma76 finds a charm in the white top's contrast with the blue body, emphasizing practicality and aesthetics without any major concerns about upkeep.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters express dislike for the emblems and white top. @Whatsupwidat questions the rationale behind adding SS emblems without proper modifications to the hood, a sentiment echoed by @RMQ333 and @NCRSmaniac who also critique the emblem placement. @FlyingMuleRider points out the lack of power steering and notes a preference for a power top, showing concern for the functionality of the vehicle. The critiques reflect a mix of disappointment regarding aesthetic choices and functional details that could have enhanced the car’s appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle's aesthetic features, particularly the color combination and interior, with @72tj highlighting these attributes. Additionally, the engagement amongst commenters revealed a shared admiration for the Michelin Cup 2 tires, as clarification from @badcad suggested that the edge wear observed was typical and not indicative of wear from tracking. @Roadman09 (The Seller) also aimed to reassure potential buyers by emphasizing that the vehicle had not been tracked, which should alleviate concerns about its performance history.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed the vehicle's condition and specifications, noting details such as the tire wear and upcoming delivery dates. @lpedersen and @Roadman09 (The Seller) both inquired about the tracking status of the vehicle, suggesting that the tires had not been excessively worn beyond normal use. The vehicle information provided revealed various technical specifications and warranty details, which may intrigue potential buyers seeking a comprehensive understanding of the model's features.
Negative: On the downside, there were a few concerns raised regarding the Z06 emblem, with @72tj and @Roadman09 (The Seller) noting that a digit appeared to be missing. This raised questions about the vehicle's history or maintenance from the detailer. Additionally, @lpedersen's observation of the tire edge wear led to discussions that might deter some potential buyers worried about the implications of that wear on the vehicle's handling or previous usage.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentators expressed strong enthusiasm and admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a "sleeper of the year" and a "beautiful, stylish work of art." @Bdpoppy20 highlighted features like the steering wheel and the cargo area seats, indicating a desire to swap their current vehicle for this one. Others like @NortEdward and @David_P praised its aesthetics and practicality despite noting the wagons' somewhat awkward appearance. Additionally, enthusiasts like @Biscotte57 embraced the car's rarity, calling it a "real museum piece" and appreciating its historical significance.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the car's mechanical condition and features, with @BobLuther (The Seller) describing the vehicle's excellent state, including a functional hydraulic suspension and no leaks. @Pompatus inquired about its mechanical needs, prompting discussions on the gas gauge issue and other maintenance details. Commenters also discussed practical aspects like the use of the cargo space for pets, with different perspectives on whether the jump seats would be comfortable for dogs.
Negative: Some users raised concerns about the car's utility and functionality, with @Fleuger99 mentioning limitations due to the unique seating arrangement and questioning the performance capabilities. @David_P pointed out the absence of seat belts—a significant consideration for potential buyers—and echoed concerns about the availability of competent mechanics, as noted by @Biscotte57 and others. Additionally, @Hatzenbach questioned the hydraulic fluid type, indicating some uncertainty regarding maintenance and parts.
![]() |
Supercharged 239 Flathead-Powered ’29 Ford Model A Tudor Sedan Hot Rod
A951601
Lot 201942
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @Dominic138 shares enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as a "really fun hot rod with really cool parts" that was built to drive. He highlights that he wants the car to be used and enjoyed rather than sitting idle in the garage. Additionally, @jagsdriver reminisces about the nostalgia of the sound of a flathead engine with dual glasspack mufflers, indicating a connection to the vehicle's charm and appeal.
Neutral: @BigPlanDan inquires about potential overheating issues, showing concern for the car's performance. @Michael34 asks for examination reports related to the vehicle, including information on the compression ratio, oil pressure, and any leaks, suggesting an interest in the car's mechanical condition. @Dominic138 responds to these queries, confirming there are no overheating issues based on his experience driving the vehicle in various conditions, and he aims to provide transparency about the car's state.
Negative: @ddama1 questions the quick sale of the car, implying there may be underlying issues that prompted the seller to return the vehicle so soon. @lelobster raises a concern regarding an oil leak, indicating a potential problem with the vehicle that could affect its reliability. Overall, these comments reflect skepticism about the vehicle's condition and the seller's motives.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The seller, @Roper0621, has been very responsive to inquiries and has provided various pieces of information about the vehicle, including copies of invoices for repairs and maintenance. The seller mentioned that the car is in great condition and fun to drive, making it clear that they care for the vehicle. Furthermore, they received compliments on the engine's performance and confirmed that there have been no rust issues, affirming the car's well-maintained status. Additionally, positive feedback from commenters like @Catapultman noted that the car is very clean and new-like, which enhances its appeal.
Neutral: There were discussions among commenters regarding specific features and conditions of the car, such as the tire date codes, the clutch's originality, and the headliner condition. The seller acknowledged comments about the headliner, mentioning that it had pulled away slightly but was not torn and could potentially be replaced in the future. Additionally, the seller confirmed that the tire codes were provided and offered to conduct driving videos to answer questions about the vehicle's condition and performance, showing a willingness to engage further with interested buyers.
Negative: Some commenters pointed out concerns regarding the headliner, with @bmwjeff highlighting visible rips, while @sales6280 noted the sagging in several places and suggested it needs replacement. The seller's response indicated a lack of awareness of these issues, which could raise doubts among potential buyers. There was also a comment from @dimitriparis asking whether the water pump was in good condition and if it was appropriate to drive the car long distances, reflecting hesitation about the vehicle's reliability. Lastly, there were apologies from @Roper0621 for the quality of the driving videos, which may not have provided the clarity buyers were looking for regarding engine lights and overall vehicle performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bmarcum expresses nostalgia for the Corvette, reminiscing about how they appreciated it in 1996 and how it evolved by 2006, positioning it just below the ZR-1 in terms of C4 appreciation. @Route71S notes the significant improvements the C4 made over the C3, highlighting its ability to compete with high-quality brands like Ferrari and Porsche, which speaks positively of the vehicle's performance capabilities. The seller, @racer355, identifies as part of a reputable company with a long-standing history in the automobile business, suggesting a strong commitment to customer satisfaction and transparency, which can foster trust among potential buyers.
Neutral: @Gotmath points out a minor error in the vehicle description, clarifying that the car is a coupe rather than a convertible. This indicates that while the car may be appealing, there may still be some need for attention to detail in the marketing materials. @racer355 offers a thorough overview of the services provided by their company, emphasizing their readiness to assist buyers and the availability of personal inspections, which could be seen as a neutral point regarding the car's attributes, focusing more on the buying process.
Negative: While there are mostly positive or neutral comments, there are no explicitly negative remarks about the vehicle itself. However, the point made by @Gotmath regarding the description error suggests some critique of the marketing approach, indicating a potential oversight that could detract from buyer confidence. The lack of any specific negative comments about the vehicle's performance or value might suggest that the vehicle is overall well-regarded, but there remains a concern about accurate representation in listings.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's beauty and condition. @53jd mentioned the car's stunning color, while @skosieruxo referred to it as a well-kept 928 5-speed. @Fargin also highlighted its unusual color, indicating a strong appeal, and @Conw5254 described it as a real gem and a tempting acquisition due to its rarity as a 5-speed model. @Dmhager shared that it is a beautiful and well-preserved car, appreciating its uncommon paint color and reminding potential buyers of its performance upgrades, showcasing a strong positive sentiment toward the vehicle.
Neutral: Several inquiries from potential buyers were aimed at clarifying the vehicle's features and condition. @mattmoore626 raised questions about the air conditioning and potential issues with the gears and odometer functionality. In response, @wildcat767676 confirmed that the A/C is strong and cold, no gear shifting issues were present, and the odometer is functioning correctly. @eboy999 questioned the stereo's appearance, to which the seller provided an explanation, noting it may have originally been a pull-out type. These comments reflect a neutral stance focused on seeking more information about the car's features.
Negative: While the overall sentiment was generally positive, there were also reservations regarding the vehicle's mileage. @Conw5254 expressed skepticism about the odometer reading based on the condition of the leather seats and pedal wear, suggesting that despite any doubts, the car remains a rare find. @prescue noted that there might be concerns about the stereo's authenticity but ultimately referred to the car as beautiful. Additionally, there was a mix-up acknowledged by @prescue, indicating the tape included with the car wasn't for this specific model, which reflects concerns about the car's historical accuracy.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's durability and classic status. @fordgt highlights the 2021 model as the last true Toyota Land Cruiser, praising its construction and longevity. @bobsaintclare admires its unmodified condition and mentions the benefits of the KDSS for off-roading, suggesting that serious modifications are unnecessary. @legacyperformancemotors calls it a great example of an incredible machine, while @HDWalt expresses satisfaction with their own purchase, emphasizing the amazing nature of the vehicle. @Mtnbum admires its low mileage and refers to it as a 'time capsule' ready for adventures.
Neutral: Several comments include inquiries about the vehicle's condition, like @Jdeere4020 asking about potential smoking odors, and @kclemenco pointing out minor rust spots on the tow hooks and undercarriage, questioning whether the car was driven on salted roads. @SharkWhite and @LCBest both request pictures of the steering wheel without its cover, indicating a need for clarity on its condition. @6mt_life and @Supraman engage in a discussion regarding steering wheel leather quality across different model years, attempting to learn more about potential issues without drawing strong conclusions.
Negative: A few negative notes arise regarding the vehicle's condition and features. @kclemenco raises concerns about rust, indicating it may have driven on salted roads, while @6mt_life mentions issues with leather quality on previous models, although others like @HDWalt dismiss this with positive remarks on their own vehicle's condition. The comments reflect some skepticism about the longevity of the steering wheel materials, with @6mt_life noting that some steering wheels had significant wear after limited use, which may raise concerns for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Kurte551 (The Seller) describes the bike as a great bike, noting his positive past experiences with multiple Z50s, emphasizing that this model is the best he's owned so far. He praises its performance, stating it starts on the first kick and rides smoothly, even noting that it can reach 30 mph uphill while accommodating his weight of 200 lbs. He also mentions that his daughter enjoys riding it, highlighting its appeal as a family-friendly vehicle. @Blizzard340 supports this positive sentiment by acknowledging the bike's aesthetic and future appreciation potential, remarking on its user-friendliness compared to older models.
Neutral: @troffer inquires about the bike's originality, reflecting a common concern among buyers regarding the authenticity of vintage bikes. After checking the pictures, @troffer expresses satisfaction, suggesting he found the information he needed. @laffman raises a question regarding the bike's transmission, noting a discrepancy in the speed information provided by @Kurte551 (The Seller). In response, @Kurte551 clarifies that the bike indeed has a three-speed transmission as manufactured, which indicates an encouraging transparency between the seller and the potential buyer.
Negative: There are no specific negative comments included about the vehicle, suggesting that feedback regarding potential issues or concerns has not been raised in the available remarks. While @laffman pointed out a discrepancy in the bike's transmission information, it ultimately ended positively with the seller confirming the correct specification. Overall, the comments reflect a generally favorable overview of the bike without critical feedback.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its stunning aesthetics and exceptional features. @gendia praises the GT Silver color, expressing a shared admiration with @radcrujones, who notes it's one of their favorite Porsche colors. Other users, like @Sebaowl and @boaboyoz, reinforce this sentiment by calling it a gorgeous and superb example. The upgrades to the car, such as the Fabspeed intake and exhaust modifications, as pointed out by @mccand, and the full leather option mentioned by @professorgearhead, are also seen as significant enhancements that elevate the vehicle's desirability.
Neutral: Many comments reflect neutral observations about the vehicle's condition and specifications. @Car_Concierge (The Seller) provides detailed information about the car's features, including the paint protection film and the new Porsche entertainment system, while reassuring potential buyers of the car's mechanical integrity following a bore scope inspection. Questions regarding details like the air conditioning and VIN verification are posed by other users, indicating an engaged and interested audience seeking clarity on specifics.
Negative: Some comments express concerns that may deter potential buyers. @jorruss raises the issue of IMS questions that often plague discussions around this car model, which suggests lingering doubts about reliability. Additionally, @popo85 questions the rapid turnover of the car by the seller, hinting at possible red flags regarding its condition or history. @desicar's inquiries about verifying the factory paint color and @DW1017's request for inspection photos also indicate skepticism that may impact buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 1992 Ford F-250 XLT is receiving high praise from various commenters for its stunning appearance and unique color combination. Commenters like @mtb414 and @Aaron9252 express admiration for the truck's aesthetics, with @Aaron9252 highlighting the significance of the Marti Report indicating its rarity. Others, such as @Cammergalaxie, refer to these trucks as 'bulletproof,' underscoring their reliability and robustness, while @swapHeart4LS calls it a 'beautiful machine.' Overall, the comments reflect a strong appreciation for the truck's visual appeal and impressive features, indicating it’s a desirable vehicle within the market.
Neutral: The seller, @FirehouseVintage, provides informative responses regarding the truck, addressing queries about its features and history. When asked by @mtb414, the seller confirms that the bench seat does fold down, and in another interaction with @pross, they assure that the paint is indeed original, including the tape stripe. Additional details about the truck's gears were clarified for @bill-d-c, who inquired about the 4.10 gears, reaffirming the vehicle's specifications and maintenance history. Furthermore, the seller encourages further engagement by suggesting potential buyers reach out for discussions or inspections, contributing to an open dialogue in the comments.
Negative: While the overall feedback is positive, some commenters, like @slaydehughes, raised concerns about any underlying issues, specifically regarding rust or paint bubbling. Despite these inquiries, @FirehouseVintage reassures them that the truck is extremely clean, without any body rust or paint problems. Nonetheless, the presence of concerns like these indicates that some potential buyers may remain cautious about the vehicle's condition. This highlights a common apprehension in the classic vehicle market, where buyers seek transparency regarding any possible flaws.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the Daihatsu HiJet Fire Truck as a "darling" and refers to it as a "wonderful beast," highlighting its appeal. @EuroClassix (The Seller) emphasizes the completeness of the truck, mentioning an array of tools included with it, which beyond those visible in the pictures, are essential for a fire truck. The detailed history and unique markings of the truck, including the significance of its city names written in multiple Japanese alphabets, add to its charm and historical value, making it a unique piece of Japanese history.
Neutral: Several commenters express interest in the vehicle, with @Schneyer asking to see a video of the water pump in action and inquiring about the registration challenges related to California emissions. @isolovers shows potential interest but raises logistical questions about transportation from California to New York and seeks additional information about the vehicle's dimensions. @EuroClassix confirms the height and overall length of the truck and addresses queries about its registration in different states.
Negative: Some potential buyers raise concerns regarding the vehicle's lack of air conditioning, as noted by @KevinKid, who simply inquires about this feature. @Schneyer also mentions the challenge of meeting California emissions requirements, highlighting the steps needed to make it compliant for registration there. @Schneyer further questions the possibilities for registering in Washington or Arizona, indicating that some aspects of the vehicle might deter prospects depending on local regulations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @geekdaddy emphasizes the pristine condition of the vehicle, noting that the bottom of this 14-year-old Audi with 85K miles is cleaner and more rust-free than that of a newer model driven in harsher climates. @Storm33 also adds a positive note, stating that this Q7 has many miles of enjoyment left based on his own experience with similar models, suggesting it’s a solid purchase. @FirstClassExotics confirms that the vehicle is a Premium Plus trim with quality features such as a Bose audio system.
Neutral: @edcabad poses several questions regarding the vehicle’s specifications, including inquiries about air suspension and trim level. Other comments reflect a curiosity about features like adaptive cruise control and the audio system manufacturer. @FirstClassExotics responds to these questions by providing detailed information about the features and confirms that the car has standard suspension.
Negative: @tomswheels raises a concern by asking if the car has been smoked in. However, @FirstClassExotics reassures potential buyers that the vehicle has never been smoked in and maintains a fresh 'new Audi' smell. Overall, there are no significant negative remarks, as most comments are either inquiring about features or praising the condition of the car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Lodgeskins appreciates the vehicle for being a no-reserve sale and considers it a good option for a weekend camper. @VWTony describes it as a nice representation of a classic bus, praising its undercoating that has preserved the original paint underneath, suggesting the vehicle has good potential. @BidRunner (The Seller) assures that the VW runs great and will surely bring joy to those who see it cruising down the highway.
Neutral: @Vdubfan2 inquires about the original fuel injection components and the source of the front bucket seats, showing interest in the vehicle's modifications. @ibuprofen shares an interpretation about the vehicle’s undercoating based on information provided. @shantanujoshi expresses a desire to confirm details about the cabin heat and mentions road trip plans, reflecting a prospective buyer's curiosity about functionality and condition.
Negative: @Vdubfan2 points out the missing heater duct and potential issues with cooling tins which may affect cabin heat and engine performance, raising valid concerns for potential buyers. @shantanujoshi confirms the lack of heat functionality and questions the cooling tins, indicating apprehension about the vehicle's readiness. @VWTony criticizes the single downdraft carburetor, stating it is not ideal for these engines and potentially affects the vehicle's performance negatively.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a lot of positive attention from users who appreciate its classic aesthetics and smooth performance. @DougH expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, while @Jr.68 reminisced fondly about his experiences with similar models, pointing out the increasing popularity of the platform. @CalvadaKing highlighted the vehicle's upgrade with a TH400 transmission, indicating that such modifications add value and performance. Many comments praise the Regal's stately design, with @68PONCHO noting the appealing color combination, and @Baronvonbrutus showing interest in bidding if the car were nearer to him. @d-1001 (The Seller) affirmed that the vehicle is solid and has been well-maintained, with a history of careful ownership in Arizona.
Neutral: Several comments provided neutral observations about the vehicle, including questions regarding certain features and queries about its specifications. @mrrogers inquired about the transmission type, and @Mike1975 asked if the Landau had been changed and commented on an aftermarket antenna. Additionally, @LeonVaughan checked on the functioning of the air conditioning, while @Wylie702 raised a question about its ability to pass emissions testing. These comments reflect an interest in the technical details and historical context of the vehicle.
Negative: There were some concerns raised regarding specifics of the vehicle's condition and features. @DrDick pointed out that the transmission type indicated might not align with what was originally available in 1977, suggesting a potential discrepancy. @ap41563 and @bozzhogg both mentioned discrepancies in the window switch images. Such comments suggest that potential buyers are keen on clarity and accuracy in the listing and might be cautious about purchasing if there are unresolved inconsistencies. However, @d-1001 (The Seller) addressed these concerns, stressing the vehicle's operational condition and the availability of the original window sticker to substantiate claims.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @hdfinder47 complimented the advertisement and praised the car's nice appearance. @Mike63 described it as a handsome sleeper that excels in performance, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @onehussler expressed appreciation for the original ownership and suggested that the car has been well cared for, based on the service receipts.
Neutral: @rwelling1 (The Seller) provided detailed information about the car, including that it has been garaged since new and comes with complete maintenance records. The seller mentioned that the wheels can be repaired and confirmed the functionality of all features. Comments about the condition of the keys were addressed, clarifying that they might not be the original keys shown in the photos.
Negative: @Yags remarked that the key fobs appeared worn and suggested better presentation in photos. @DrivenAutoCo raised concerns regarding the condition of the keys and questioned the actual maintenance of the vehicle, suggesting possible neglect. The seller responded to these concerns but did not fully address the perceived state of the keys.
![]() |
17k-Mile 2013 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport Convertible 3LT
1G1YW3DW4D5100363
Lot 201980
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @jimintx expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as "really, really great looking" and assuring that the new owner will share the same love for it. @C5Corvette proclaims there is nothing not to love about this Corvette, calling it perfect and expressing a desire for it, albeit with a humorous nod towards saving for a nursing home. Additionally, @nelson765 describes the car as gorgeous and notes its potential as a perfect candidate for adding a supercharger, reflecting excitement about its capabilities and aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: @BobSoCal suggests that providing a photo of the vehicle's window sticker or build sheet would enhance the listing, as it would clarify the exact equipment included. @1968SS427 points out the car's features, indicating it seems to be a Heritage edition and a 3LT, sharing relevant details about the model. @newcarpro contributes detailed technical data about the vehicle, including specifications, delivery information, and option codes, which could be important for prospective buyers wanting to understand the vehicle's history and features.
Negative: @Sparks66 inquires about the date codes on the tires, hinting at a potential issue regarding tire age. @rich150 asks about the inclusion of a dealer-installed windscreen, which could imply uncertainty about whether all expected accessories are present. @hammersmith responds to @Sparks66 with information about the car's tire date, showing that there might be an aging concern that could influence the vehicle's value and safety.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @marcnotmark expresses excitement at the concept of a police car, humorously imagining it in a chase scenario with lights and sirens activated. @revwerks shares a playful intent to modify the vehicle with lights if they win the auction, showcasing enthusiasm and creativity regarding the vehicle's potential uses. @Russ fondly recalls owning a similar small block 250 cc Isetta back in 1972, suggesting a nostalgic appreciation for this unique model.
Neutral: @49miledriver notes that the enforcement duties of this police vehicle were limited to minor infractions, indicating that it may not have been heavily used for serious law enforcement purposes. @ekries, the seller, actively engages with potential buyers by encouraging them to reach out with any questions, suggesting a willingness to provide more information about the vehicle and fostering a friendly auction environment.
Negative: @Just_me humorously comments on the vehicle's top speed of 50 mph, implying that outrunning a police Isetta would be relatively easy, which pokes fun at the car's limitations. This comment suggests a perception of the vehicle as underpowered or not intimidating in a pursuit scenario, which could detract from its credibility as a police car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the LC convertible as absolutely fabulous, expressing a strong preference for it over previous models. @Winnipesaukee is impressed by the burgundy leather interior, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @Hoppy18 appreciates the positive feedback and compliments the seller on offering a nice example of the vehicle.
Neutral: @Stevedog requests a video showcasing the convertible top's operation, indicating an interest in the vehicle's features. @JSimms22 also asks about the stance of the car and the availability of a video for the power windows, specifically the rear drop function, showing an eagerness for more information about the car's functionalities. The seller, @superiorautosales, addresses these queries and provides a video of the convertible top operation.
Negative: @plizotte raises a concern about the appearance of the car listing to port, seeking clarification from the seller. @JSimms22 shares a similar concern about the vehicle's stance, suggesting there might be an issue. @superiorautosales responds, attempting to alleviate worries by explaining that the car's positioning on a slope may be causing the illusion of an uneven stance, while confirming that the car sits straight.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @RMQ333 expressed enthusiasm for the car, noting it as a great Z that should perform well despite a preference for a different hood height and color. @fifi01 praised the seller for being forthcoming and described the vehicle as a great driver, emphasizing its enjoyable nature rather than its originality. @pro_zach1 complimented the overall appearance of the car and acknowledged the thoughtful feedback given to the seller regarding the potential for panel adjustments, appreciating the effort that had gone into the restoration.
Neutral: The seller, @afd303, provided detailed responses to inquiries from potential buyers, explaining the restoration history and components of the vehicle. They clarified that the RS front nose is fiberglass and acknowledged that aftermarket components may not fit perfectly. They noted that while the car is a clean and fun driver, it was not intended to be a concours-level restoration and that some modifications, such as the lower dash and seatbelt warning light, were made for functional purposes.
Negative: @David7212 raised concerns about the authenticity of certain aspects of the car, including the missing gas pedal and questionable aftermarket parts, suggesting that this may not be an original split bumper car. @broodie supported these concerns, asking for clarifications about the restoration and fitment issues. @pro_zach1 also pointed out significant misalignments in the body panels, indicating potential hidden issues with the bodywork, which the seller admitted might require adjustments.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @69_911e expressed excitement about the vehicle's restoration, recalling a memorable commercial associated with it. @owenpVW (The Seller) shared that they are a student in the Automotive restoration program and found the project to be a valuable learning experience. They also noted that they installed a complete door seal kit without any leftover pieces, indicating a thorough restoration process. @rickMLCKH reminisced about their own 1970 Type 3 Fastback, describing it as a beloved first car that was fun to drive, which adds a nostalgic charm to the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: @owenpVW (The Seller) confirmed that the red paint on the car is slightly darker than the original color but still fairly close. @onzoom inquired about missing inner door seal trim, while @type14 pointed out a potential missing seal on one of the pictures, voicing some concern about the vehicle's completeness. @WJL2953 questioned whether the paint color matched the original code, showing interest in its authenticity.
Negative: @Knuckles-R-Busted mentioned feeling tempted by the vehicle despite their preference for a square back wagon, hinting at a slight hesitation concerning the model type. @BoltonBlue shared an embarrassing anecdote about a problem with reverse in their sister's Fastback, highlighting issues that may arise with older vehicles. The underlying concern about the vehicle's original features and compatibility with memories might suggest potential buyers' apprehensions regarding reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is praised for its impressive dimensions, which have been clearly communicated by @ExperiorMotors (The Seller). With a length of 21' 2", width of 8', and height of 10' 3", it offers substantial cargo space and robust build quality that could serve various purposes from on-road to off-road adventures. Additionally, the truck boasts a clean Florida title, enhancing its appeal to potential buyers. @ExperiorMotors (The Seller) also emphasizes the historical value of the 1985 Norwegian registration document, showcasing its preservation and uniqueness, which adds charm to the vehicle's story.
Neutral: @ExperiorMotors (The Seller) provided detailed dimensions and specifics regarding the vehicle's features, including the size of the roll-up cargo doors and their functional warning lights. This information is beneficial for prospective buyers who need to know how the vehicle can accommodate their needs and the condition of its features. The seller answered a query from @Qbailey75 regarding flood damage, asserting confidently that there has been no flooding or water damage and highlighting the vehicle’s height, which is effective for handling such situations.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Qbailey75 regarding the possibility of flood or water damage in the vehicle's history. Although @ExperiorMotors (The Seller) addressed these concerns by confirming there was none, the query indicates that potential buyers may still harbor doubts about the vehicle's past, which could affect their decision-making. The seller’s strong reassurance about the vehicle's robustness is a slight attempt to alleviate such apprehensions, but past damage remains a pertinent point in assessing the vehicle's overall condition.
![]() |
8.1L Vortec-Powered 1964 Chevrolet K20 Fleetside Pickup 4×4 4-Speed
4K253J112031
Lot 201990
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its unique features and retro design. @jdjonesdr described it simply as a 'Beast,' while @CarDogThreePedals praised the innovative design of the air cleaner, stating that this build was both fun and functional. @Stropp complimented the truck's good looks and thanked the seller for maintaining a retro aesthetic instead of altering it for a lower stance. @JayKay2430 echoed the praise by calling the use of coil packs in the air cleaner 'genius' and noted the old-school big block appearance enhanced by the crossed flags decal and Chevy Orange engine paint. Overall, the design choices were celebrated as smart and effective.
Neutral: Comments included inquiries about specific technical aspects of the build. @heneryj asked how the truck performs at 60 mph, and @Shopie requested details about the carrier ratios. @Bandit185, the seller, engaged with these questions by affirming that the truck drives smoothly at 60 mph and has been driven at 80 mph comfortably. However, they admitted to not knowing the precise gear ratio. Additionally, there were queries about potential driving videos, with @JLsKA510 suggesting that interior perspectives would be preferable.
Negative: While most feedback was positive, there was a slight concern noted by @Stropp regarding the adhesive application of the 8.1 Vortec badges, questioning whether they were drilled or adhesive. This comment suggested a desire for a more understated approach to advertising the truck's capabilities. However, @Bandit185 confirmed that the badges were, in fact, adhesive, which aligned with the truck's sleeper look that the commenters appreciated.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters are expressing their excitement about the bike's unique color scheme, particularly praising the Factory Hard Candy Gold Flake paint as stunning, especially under varying light conditions. @JuanPablo commented on how beautiful and unique the Deluxe's colors are, indicating a strong visual appeal. Additionally, @WagnersClassicCars provided details that the bike is nearly new, with only 2,660 miles and a comprehensive list of features that enhance its desirability, including factory-installed options and meticulous care by the previous owner.
Neutral: @mdmatus95 inquired about the presence of bags or cases on the bike, to which @WagnersClassicCars responded by confirming that the purchase includes both a windscreen and new bags, showcasing the bike's practical features. The seller also reiterated the bike's one-owner status and highlighted various accessories that come with it, such as a battery charger and original manuals, providing potential buyers with useful information without exhibiting strong opinions either way.
Negative: There appears to be no significant negative feedback regarding the vehicle in the comments provided. While @Lubedude1 sought clarification on whether the bike maintains its stock pipes and muffler, which could imply a concern for modification impacts on performance or compliance, @WagnersClassicCars clarified that it does indeed have the stock components. Overall, the comments predominantly reflect positive or neutral sentiments with minimal negative concerns.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's stunning design and impressive restoration. @Bill_Noon highlights the exceptional attention to detail and the time-consuming effort put into this trailer, calling it a "labor of Love." Several individuals, such as @jujitsu and @Dollycat3, note that the trailer not only serves as a collector's item but also captures a nostalgic feeling of mid-century Americana, making it seem like a piece of art. Enthusiasts like @Dexandsqueak and @Dollycat3 express their desire to eventually see the trailer in a museum, appreciating its historical significance. Furthermore, the seller, @54NewMoon, elaborates on the restoration process, emphasizing the beauty and craftsmanship put into recreating the trailer from the film "The Long, Long Trailer."
Neutral: Some comments highlight practical considerations surrounding the use and towing of the trailer. @Cryobrad54 questions certain aspects of the visible infrastructure, noting an overlooked wire splice and speculating about the frame condition. @Tobyallen and @Valiantjim engage in discussions about the feasibility of towing the trailer with vintage vehicles, mentioning the need for a capable tow vehicle. Additionally, @RDublu shares relevant insights on zoning and placement of such trailers, recognizing the differences between park trailers and RVs. The seller also addresses some of these concerns directly, providing clarity on the trailer's features and its ability to be towed safely.
Negative: A few comments point out concerns regarding the high asking price of $240,000 for the trailer, with individuals like @Y2K911 noting that such a sum could buy a decent house in many regions. @bondgraham humorously mentions that the restoration costs might elicit some "splainin'" to do at home. Others like @Knuckles-R-Busted and @bewildered raise questions about specific functional aspects of the trailer, including the state of the refrigerator and shower connections, implying that potential buyers may want more functional assurance. Overall, while the trailer receives widespread acclaim, there is a clear acknowledgment of its significant price point and queries about its usability and practicality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning appearance and beautiful color. @beer_and_fish called it stunning, while @johnq02 noted that the car and its photos appeared like they were straight from a sales brochure. @SJB123 referred to it simply as a beauty, and @GDogg echoed this sentiment by describing it as absolutely sensational. @02fanatic remarked on the rarity of the car, calling it an absolutely stunning example that one doesn't see often, and @adawil2002 complemented the car's fun driving experience, reminiscing fondly about the Cabriolet. The seller, @samboss, also contributed positively, noting the car's stunning characteristics and promising more videos of it soon.
Neutral: Comments also reflected a desire for more information and some practical inquiries about the vehicle's details. @ShamrockRally humorously asked if the clock works, while @Rdaino inquired about the originality of the seatbelts and passenger side mirror. @Dsabo21 asked about the age of the tires and expressed interest in the challenge of finding 13-inch tires. Others, like @igogetm and @adawil2002, requested further details about the restoration, such as documentation and photos, indicating an inquisitiveness from potential buyers about the vehicle's history and condition. The seller, @samboss, responded to these inquiries, providing assurances about the car's condition and functionality.
Negative: Some comments hinted at potential concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @groceg made a light remark about the instruments and gauges, suggesting that not much was available to display. @JGraham expressed a notion that the car was almost too nice to drive, which could imply a hesitation about using it as intended. @adawil2002 further raised questions related to the soft top and prior repairs, questioning why certain issues were not addressed before the listing. The seller addressed these concerns directly, assuring that there is no damage to the top and that the rocker panels are in solid condition, which may help alleviate some worries.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments reflect a general appreciation for the Mighty Mite as a unique military vehicle. @AMWeidman0205 (The Seller) highlights its historical significance, detailing his father's experience with the Mite during service. Several users acknowledge its lightweight design and appeal in terms of maneuverability, suggesting it could serve well in roles like parades or postal duties. @j2allard expresses admiration for the vehicle's ability to navigate difficult terrains without requiring four-wheel drive, further enhancing its desirability among collectors and enthusiasts.
Neutral: Some comments provide technical insights into the Mighty Mite's specifications and performance, such as its dimensions and weight, with @CowboyJoe quoting exact figures from Wikipedia. There is discussion about its drivetrain and handling characteristics, including @AMWeidman0205 (The Seller)'s clarification about its transmission and suspension system. Also, there are mentions of the vehicle's street legality, which @AMWeidman0205 (The Seller) confirms, noting the inclusion of new headlamps to enhance usability.
Negative: Concerns about the driving experience are echoed in various comments, particularly regarding stability and safety. @NickB describes the vehicle as having a tendency to swap ends due to its short wheelbase, leading to potential rollover incidents. While he acknowledges the fun of driving it, he warns that it can be tricky. @xstates adds that drivers must be aware of handling due to external conditions and provides a comparative analogy with other Jeep models to illustrate the risks involved. @Overextended's inquiries indicate a need for further clarification on the vehicle's suitability for taller drivers, highlighting potential discomfort.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its appearance and overall quality. @moosegilliam called it a 'Great job!', while @bstroud and @DBG1973 described the GMC as 'great looking' and 'beautiful' respectively. Commenters like @NYAZ praised the truck's aesthetic with the 2-inch lift and specific wheels, emphasizing its 'picture perfect!!!' look. @mc450 noted the attention to detail with the restoration, affirming it as a top-quality project. The seller, @Idealcars, also contributed to the positive remarks by stating the truck runs well, handles smoothly on highways, and generates compliments from others, further reinforcing the appealing nature of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments posed questions and provided clarifications about the vehicle's features and condition. @Thor944 and @f4windex specifically brought up the lack of air conditioning controls, indicating a lack of clarity in the listing regarding the A/C. @Ratz77 inquired about potential rust, leaks, and overall functionality, to which @Idealcars responded that the truck is in good condition without rust issues. Questions regarding the engine were also raised by @Ratz77, who sought information about whether the engine was a replacement and the specifics of its history. @JimReeves added to the conversation about shipping options for the vehicle, while @Bernard commented on the overall quality of the truck, noting it had a well-done restoration versus typical standards for vehicles of that era.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism about the bidding process and the truck's authenticity. @JimReeves made accusations of potential price inflation and collusion with the seller, questioning the integrity of the bidding on the platform. Similar sentiments were echoed by @Dinox64 and @Bernard, who hinted at unusually high bid jumps that raised doubts about the auction's fairness. @Ratz77 also pointed out possible discrepancies regarding the oil plug and engine history, adding to the concerns some commenters had regarding the vehicle's genuineness. Overall, the discussions indicated a mix of admiration for the vehicle's beauty tempered by concerns about its auction process and authenticity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous comments praise the vehicle's aesthetic and performance traits. @Markmarkm expressed admiration, stating it is a fantastic stunner, while @pinkbeachbomb highlighted the car's pristine condition and careful ownership. @lemondzurich commended the seller for going above and beyond in sourcing difficult-to-find parts and the installation of a full paint protection film, indicating a commitment to preserving the car's appearance. Additionally, @TheEnthusiastGarage shared an enthusiastic endorsement, describing the car as raw and faultless, suggesting that its unique qualities make it a joy to own and drive.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's mileage and ownership history present a mixed perspective. @Lysandr and @gqrob28 discussed the prevalence of low mileage examples, suggesting many owners use the 4C primarily as a secondary car. The seller, @DeMille, provided an overview of their own ownership experience, detailing extensive maintenance and upgrades made to the vehicle. Questions about the vehicle's history and previous maintenance were raised, particularly by @MM4 concerning the specifics of paint protection film installation and any previous work done on the car.
Negative: Some comments indicated concerns about the vehicle's practicality. @1henrydog mentioned that the noise level from the car was so high that the radio was essentially useless. This comment hints at potential usability issues for owners expecting comfort alongside performance. @Red99 raised a point regarding the early completion of a full body torque service, suggesting a worry about possible mechanical issues if the fasteners were loosening prematurely. This concern was addressed by @DeMille, who reassured that all bolts were in specification, but it nonetheless reflects some underlying apprehension about the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ejoak calls the vehicle a 'beauty,' indicating a strong appreciation for its aesthetic appeal, although he notes the absence of power steering, suggesting a personal limitation due to age. @rgpiatt expresses a preference for this vehicle over the classic 57 Chevy, highlighting its desirability among classic car enthusiasts. Overall, these comments reflect a positive sentiment toward the vehicle's design and uniqueness.
Neutral: @Muttsydog1 (The Seller) provides background information on the car, discussing its rebuild and encouraging potential bidders to review prior listings for more details. The seller mentions owning multiple special interest cars and explains the decision to sell due to time constraints and personal circumstances, which presents a neutral standpoint regarding the vehicle while adding context to the sale.
Negative: @mike_rockwell shares a skeptical opinion about the vehicle's appearance, specifically criticizing the large factory bumpers and suggesting they would benefit from a more stylish design ('bling'). The comment reflects a less favorable view on certain aesthetic choices made in the vehicle's build.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its positive attributes, particularly its originality and appeal. @EHINSD, the seller, confirms that the vehicle retains its original motor and drivetrain, which is viewed positively by potential buyers like @NVGT350, who wishes the seller luck with the auction. Commenters such as @RDWAutomotive and @Nutzandboltz express admiration for the car, with descriptions like 'Nice Mach1' and 'Beautiful car!!' enhancing its reputation. Additionally, the vehicle's distinctive pastel grey color, though unique, garners attention and interest from viewers like @watergate528, who describes it as 'sharp' and praises the color.
Neutral: The vehicle's color and features have sparked discussions that reflect a mix of curiosity and uncertainty among commenters. @Joep1983 questions the decision behind the car's pastel grey color, suggesting it might not be a conventional choice for a Mach 1. Similarly, @Ohioken points out discrepancies in color charts, debating the original paint and sharing personal insights about the vehicle's specifications. Commenters like @Gopher428 and @CarFoolLane also discuss technical details related to the vehicle, such as the rear spoiler angle and gear ratios, indicating a level of interest in performance aspects, while remaining neutral about the car's overall value.
Negative: There are some critiques and concerns about the vehicle suggested by various commenters. @Gopher428 raises issues about spoiler adjustments, implying that the current setup could cause lift rather than downforce. Additionally, @gebirg expresses disdain for specific design choices like the spoilers and slats, suggesting a desire for a more classic aesthetic. @Jdrone and @machmiller inquire about the car's condition, specifically checking for rust and the originality of floor and body panels, hinting at potential red flags. While these comments do not detract from the overall admiration for the car, they reflect a cautious approach from some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments show a genuine admiration for the vehicle, particularly appreciating the rich history behind this specific engine, designated as the fifth Vincent Rapide Series B engine ever produced. @C-Wally mentions that a man in flip-flops riding this Vincent is a 'badass' and commends @frankpeters for his riding ability. Furthermore, @buellwinkle expresses that words cannot do justice to the machine, which indicates a strong affection for the bike's aesthetic and mechanical qualities. Commenters also show appreciation for @frankpeters' efforts in providing detailed history and specifications, highlighting the value of the bike and the impressive restoration story shared by the seller.
Neutral: Several commenters are asking questions about the practical aspects of the bike, signaling curiosity but not disapproval. @Basil017 and @ruffknuckles both express interest in seeing a cold start video to understand the bike's operational condition better. @mach1970 and @Talia also inquire about the bike's ability to idle and the engine's number, respectively, which shows an interest in maintenance issues. There are also discussions about potential concerns regarding gear issues raised by @rantoulpawn and responses that suggest possible reasons for those issues, fostering a neutral exchange of technical information.
Negative: Some comments indicate cautious skepticism regarding the vehicle's originality, particularly focusing on the engine and whether the rest of the bike matches its original specifications. @mach1970 asks about the bike not wanting to idle properly, which raises concerns about its functionality. Additionally, @Talia expresses doubts about whether the engine number has been restamped, hinting at possible authenticity issues. @DaveD humorously questions @frankpeters' attire while riding over 100 mph, which could suggest concerns over safety while also bringing a light-hearted perspective to a serious topic. This indicates some underlying issues with the vehicle that potential buyers might want to consider.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: There are numerous positive comments highlighting the NSX Type S as an impressive machine. @The_Dude_Abides praises the car's killer specifications and mentions the transformative qualities of the Red Star products, emphasizing how they enhance the overall driving experience. @Vtec4ever shares a similar sentiment, stating that while he wasn't initially impressed by the vehicle, it has since grown on him, noting that it's a worthy contender under the NSX badge for daily driving. Other users, like @boaboyoz and @DatboiDennis, also express their admiration for the car's aesthetics and performance, with @boaboyoz describing it as a "sweet specimen" and @SammySammy remarking on the escalating auction prices as a testament to its desirability.
Neutral: A variety of users have also shared neutral insights on the vehicle's practicalities. @mshobe acknowledges that the NSX Type S can be a comfortable daily driver, particularly during long trips, although he notes some practicality concerns such as gas mileage and trunk heat. @Joexray77 offers a different perspective on the vehicle's hybrid performance, highlighting that the hybrid system supports sport-like capabilities rather than enhancing fuel efficiency. Meanwhile, @sgvf80, the seller, provides detailed information about the car, such as the limited production numbers and enhancements like the lightweight package and paint protection, which are informative but do not sway either positive or negative.
Negative: However, there are also a few critical comments regarding the NSX Type S. @The_Dude_Abides points out that while the car excels in many aspects, it falls short in fuel efficiency, having a small gas tank and a lack of adjustable seats, which could deter some potential buyers. @Msobczyk reinforces this by agreeing on the issue of poor gas mileage for a hybrid while also mentioning the outdated infotainment system. Additionally, @NSXGT3RS highlights some limitations like lack of powered folding mirrors and questions regarding aftermarket options, expressing uncertainty about the vehicle's practicality for those with specific needs, which could impact purchasing decisions for some interested buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @daddsun described the 280Z as a great example, pointing out its well-preserved condition and highlighting its original components, including a surviving packing slip dating back to 1976. @OldZzz appreciated the car's originality and care from previous owners, commending its rust-free appearance and noting its appealing Polar White color. @gkw45 shared their positive experience as a previous owner, stating that the car was reliable and fun to drive, saying it would make for a delightful driver for the next owner. @starmotors (The Seller) emphasized the vehicle's excellent mechanical condition, listing features such as great acceleration, cold air conditioning, and a smooth ride alongside well-maintained original parts.
Neutral: There were discussions around the vehicle's engine and performance ratings, with @SeanDezart and @4CAlfa debating horsepower figures typical of the time and suggesting discrepancies in ratings versus reality. @preith asked for confirmation of the head casting number while @RichardSli expressed interest in inspection details regarding the spare tire floor area and additional charges for shipping, indicating a practical approach to potential ownership. @Miley2020 raised several questions regarding the heater functionality, the possibility of leaks, and the car's condition for long drives, showcasing a buyer's thorough inquiry process before committing to a purchase.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about specific issues, such as @SeanDezart questioning the accuracy of horsepower ratings and suggesting potential discrepancies in the vehicle's performance claims. @Miley2020 also expressed doubts about the car's overall capacity to handle various conditions, such as passing inspections and reliability under stress from driving in different environments. Furthermore, @RichardSli inquired about the paint and the history of the vehicle, hinting at concerns over potential previous repairs or modifications that might affect its authenticity and value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Fredges remarked humorously about the vehicle's horn, which sparked a sense of urgency to buy. @CarFoolLane appreciated the attractive color combination and the color-coordinated curtains, even though they expressed a desire to remove the dual luggage racks. They hinted at a story behind the vehicle's color being a 'good luck charm' for one Type 2, connecting it to a local fire survival tale. @bondgraham echoed positive sentiments from fellow splitty owners, praising the vehicle's reconditioning and claiming that driving it would convert anyone to love blue. @DaveSUllivan, the seller, shared his journey of acquiring the vehicle in Brazil while visiting family, explaining that the excitement from owning classic cars like this one drew crowds at car shows, and folks love to see it in action.
Neutral: @MacTim expressed interest in how to handle the paperwork for Brazilian imports, indicating a logistical aspect of owning the vehicle. @alanbrase brought attention to practical considerations, noting the absence of heating or defrosting features, which could be a concern for driving in certain climates in the USA. They suggested that such systems could be installed, albeit at a cost. @JayKay2430 pointed out that a video showcasing the vehicle was filmed in Brazil, not in Michigan, adding context to the vehicle's background while remaining largely neutral about its value or condition.
Negative: There were some concerns expressed about the vehicle's functionality. @alanbrase highlighted that the lack of heating and defrosting controls could pose challenges, particularly in colder areas. Even though @DaveSUllivan assured that the vehicle is mechanically sound and being serviced, @alanbrase's points raised valid concerns about comfort and usability in diverse weather conditions. No other negative comments were noted, aside from practical considerations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 described the vehicle as a beautiful and rare combination of Harvest Beige and Tobacco Brown, expressing admiration for its striking aesthetics. @Urbanista echoed this sentiment, highlighting the luscious color combination of the car. @MichaelKirschmann commented on the car's authenticity for a 1973 model, praising its vintage appeal.
Neutral: @gdaring, the seller, provided useful insights into the vehicle’s condition, explaining that the driveline vibration is speed-related and hasn't changed over the last ten years of ownership. They mentioned the heater fan appears to have an electrical issue but noted that heat still comes through the vents when the vehicle is in motion. Furthermore, the seller assured that a minor power steering fluid leak requires minimal maintenance, needing topping off only every six months.
Negative: @CarFoolLane expressed disapproval of the plastic sunroof deflectors, stating they have a negative impact on the appearance of nice cars. Additionally, @MichaelKirschmann cautioned potential buyers about the risks of rust in vehicles from Hawaiian heritage, sharing a personal experience of salt air damaging a new car's body. Overall, @gdaring had to acknowledge at least one spot of rust that was treated after purchase, although they believe the vehicle is otherwise rust-free.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it a wonderful Bentley R-Type, which indicates a favorable opinion of its aesthetic and desirability. Additionally, @novaguy2 remarked on the general smoothness of Bentley engines, which ties into the brand's reputation for quality engineering.
Neutral: @jorgebbzlimo, the seller, provided context about the vehicle's history, mentioning that he purchased it from an estate after the previous owner had restored it and kept it stored for about 20 years. Questions from commenters like @kevingd regarding the low mileage and history of previous owners suggest curiosity about the car's background, which is typically important for potential buyers.
Negative: On the downside, there were multiple concerns raised regarding the car's engine performance. @Lubedude1 and @2_veloce requested cold start and driving videos to better assess the vehicle, while @novaguy2 voiced worry over visible vibrations and potential misfiring. @OWLBYRD and @Kimiruibal both criticized the engine's sound quality, indicating that it did not meet expectations for a vehicle of its class.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the rarity and excellent condition of the Boxster, with @Collectibleclassics calling it a 'beautiful time capsule' and emphasizing that it has been garage-kept and is in pristine underbody condition. The car is presented as a 15k-mile example with minimal wear on seats and bolsters, suggesting it has been well-maintained. Commenters like @Juggs44 express interest in the vehicle's mechanical integrity, particularly noting the low probability of bore scoring due to the base motor setup, and @waypoint66 appreciates the car's aesthetics, calling it 'great' and expressing interest in learning more about Porsche maintenance topics.
Neutral: There are numerous questions regarding the IMS (Intermediate Shaft) bearing and maintenance considerations related to the car's age and mileage. @thriftyscrooge raises practical inquiries about potential necessary maintenance such as replacing the RMS and clutch in light of the vehicle’s age, while others contribute to the discussion with their knowledge of IMS bearing upgrades. @BillyBaldone mentions having a similar model and offers insight into the factory's IMS bearings, highlighting the nuances of differing years and specifications. There is healthy debate on this topic, but some like @RS60Spyder express fatigue with the ongoing IMS discussions.
Negative: Concerns are expressed about the potential need for repairs or maintenance, particularly regarding the IMS bearing and the leather seat. @Namtrop66 points out a possible tear in the driver's seat, prompting @Collectibleclassics to acknowledge it and suggest it can be addressed before the car is sold. There are also questions about the vehicle's performance and any associated issues, with @Peterjohnr raising worry about white smoke during cold starts. Additionally, @joey88tc critiques the driving behavior observed in a video, hinting at possible careless driving practices. Overall, some commenters raise doubts about certain aspects of the car's condition and the seller's transparency regarding repairs needed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @HPoint expressed excitement about the vehicle, noting its great specifications. They are eager to bid and requested videos demonstrating the vehicle's features, such as the functionality of power locks and windows, AC and heater operation, and a cold start. They also asked for a picture of the headliner, showing a keen interest in the vehicle's condition and performance.
Neutral: @DarkSky provided a technical detail about the vehicle, mentioning that the factory rear window is vacuum operated. They also sought information about finding an electric conversion setup for a vehicle of this model year, indicating interest in potential modifications without expressing a strong opinion about the current state of the vehicle.
Negative: @Vonkster, the seller, acknowledged that they are still working on providing the requested videos. This may imply some delays or challenges in meeting customer inquiries. The need for further information about the conversion setup suggests potential concerns from buyers regarding the existing features of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the VW Bug, with @Ray1990 noting it as a really nice car, and @dtrujillo12 appreciating the connection with Chris Vallone, who rebuilt the engine. The seller, @Beuk73, received compliments for the thorough restoration efforts and the care put into the vehicle. Many found the car charming and unique, with @bostonaudi love for its color and @tlcamg highlighting the excitement of the auction with early bids.
Neutral: Some comments focused on the car's specifics and the restoration process. @mick59 provided constructive criticism about the alignment of bullet signals and the originality of certain features, while @Braukuche offered insights about the fenders and interior. The seller, @Beuk73, acknowledged these points and expressed openness to discussions, aiming for transparency regarding the car's history and modifications, which added depth to the auction context.
Negative: However, not all comments were positive, as some users like @mick59 pointed out discrepancies in the car's features compared to original specifications. There were discussions about the aftermarket elements, including concerns about the fenders and running boards, with @Pfeil suggesting terminology inconsistencies in the vehicle's condition description. @stephen844 also raised concerns about potential structural issues related to the jack points, which prompted the seller to reassure bidders about the car's condition and functionality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @NoHarmLookin describes the vehicle as a nice ‘90s time capsule with a plush interior. @abaucom shares fond memories of owning a supercharged Riviera, describing it as comfortable and powerful. @SOHC427 praises the car's great appearance and cleanliness, while @52GMC (The Seller) mentions that it has been owned by a military veteran since 1995, always garaged, and comes with all service records. The seller emphasizes the vehicle's stunning ruby red color and fantastic driving experience. @thunderchicken compares driving the car to flying first class, stating it's smooth and relaxing, reinforcing its appeal as a roadworthy vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters ask about specific features of the car and its history. @kink56 questions whether the CD player works and whether any suspension work has been completed. Additionally, @James_MA inquires about the year the Riviera name was last used. @52GMC (The Seller) addresses these concerns in responses, affirming the CD player works, confirming shocks were replaced, and elaborating on various functions of the car. @Rivnut and @kink56 provide insights about Buick's market relevance and quality while discussing the previous care the car received, including references to service at Becker Buick.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about certain issues with the vehicle. @kink56 notes the importance of knowing the date codes on the tires, as older tires could be a safety concern despite their appearance. They also mention that the antenna may require rebuilding as it does not operate as intended. Furthermore, the comment by @kink56 regarding the previous owner only being a flipper raises doubts about the seller's familiarity with the vehicle. @CarFoolLane expresses disappointment in the current state of Buick's offerings compared to the vehicle being auctioned, indicating a negative sentiment about Buick's market position.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its appeal among potential buyers, with @ADS90 praising the fun color and describing it as a stunning example. @CapitalImports also shares enthusiasm, stating it is a great looking Westfield and a proper go-kart for the street. Additionally, @jeffball appreciates the seamless transaction experience he had when dealing with @castlecombemotorsports, indicating reliability and trustworthiness in the seller's dealings.
Neutral: Comments reflect a mix of curiosity and logistical inquiries. @Rockndawg and @otis3sgte ask about the vehicle's registration status, revealing concerns about its compliance in California, to which @castlecombemotorsports responds candidly. There’s also a technical discussion as @joshtattooer inquires about the structural integrity of the oil pan, to which the seller reassures that it appears structurally sound despite its usage. @Ventus and @dfree request details regarding the dimensions and compression, indicating a thoughtful interest in the specifics of the vehicle's design and performance.
Negative: Some comments reveal potential concerns about the vehicle's condition. @mmoguls raises doubts about registering the car in California, questioning whether it can pass the necessary inspections. @joshtattooer appears skeptical about the structural integrity of the oil pan, asking if it might need replacement. Furthermore, there is mention of wear in the interior, including worn carpet and tears, as pointed out in @castlecombemotorsports' description of the vehicle, suggesting it may require additional investment from the buyer.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and rarity. @Dollycat3 praised the Impala for its wonderful color combination and suggested a sympathetic restoration to enjoy it further. @skychief9 noted the appreciation for the original condition of the model and the long-term ownership, mentioning how the car could bring happiness to its next owner. Commenters like @RamblinMan and @Hoppy18 acknowledged the need for some tender loving care but saw great potential in the car, with @Hoppy18 reminiscing about its history linked to his own birth year.
Neutral: Several commenters shared their nostalgic experiences associated with similar vehicles. @TPH56 recounted memories of a friend’s convertible during their teenage years, expressing warmth for the joy cars can provide. Others like @jagLady and @skychief9 reminisced about their past connections to the Impala model, with @jagLady mentioning her own stolen convertible of the same year and @skychief9 appreciating the classic lines of this model and its need for some repairs, contributing to the emotional value surrounding the car.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the car's condition. @skychief9 asked if the seller could provide photos of past restorations to better understand the bodywork, indicating worries about rust and body filler. The seller, @psk96, confirmed the presence of body filler and shared a backstory involving family tragedy and the vehicle's long-term storage, which implies a lack of upkeep. This transparency about the needs of the car led to a mixture of appreciation but also acknowledgment that it requires care before it can be truly enjoyed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly its limited mileage of only 411 miles. @HKMotorcars (The Seller) provides information that the car was last on track in 2022 and has been maintained in a climate-controlled facility. The Seller mentions that a set of additional wheels with wet tires is included in the sale, and the paintwork is confirmed to be Purewhite rather than a wrap, indicating quality and care in the car's upkeep. @Bicecld shares personal experience that entering and exiting the Clubsport model is manageable even for taller drivers, and others echo similar sentiments, showing a generally positive interest in the car's usability and track capability.
Neutral: Several comments express questions that indicate a desire for more information about the car. @Mr_Persnickety raises several specific inquiries about past usage, any damage history, and the accessories included with the vehicle. @Pinecreek81 inquires about locating answers for general questions regarding the auction. @HKMotorcars responds promptly, ensuring potential buyers are informed about key aspects of the vehicle, and encourages further inquiries. The conversation surrounding the condition of the fuel cell, the necessity for new foam, and whether spare parts are included showcases a comprehensive discussion about the car's upkeep.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition are raised by some users, with @45series and @Speaks911 noting that the front splitter appears to have significant wear for such low mileage, suggesting possible track abuse. @JCMbat lists several expired components, including the fuel cell and fire bottle, raising alarm over the car's potential hidden issues. Furthermore, there are inquiries about missing parts such as the fuel pump out hose and air-jack wand, which could detract from the vehicle's appeal to buyers. Overall, while there is excitement about the car, these comments highlight significant reservations that could affect buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @stevenkiger, the seller, shares a deep affection for the vehicle and highlights its performance, stating it drives like a sports car in mountainous areas. The seller is transparent about the vehicle's history, clarifying its service and accident background, and expresses confidence in its readiness for road trips without issues. Enthusiastic comments like @mikeroten's showcase excitement for the VR6 engine, while enthusiasts like @snafuracer express a desire for the vehicle, indicating its appeal among VW fans.
Neutral: The seller responds to various inquiries about the vehicle's condition, including accident repairs and modifications made after the original sale. @stevenkiger addresses questions about the vehicle's factory features, such as the tow package added in 2023 and clarifies misunderstandings about the number of owners listed by Carfax. Additionally, comments from potential buyers seek details on maintenance records and performance upgrades.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects, there are some concerns raised by commenters. @Rockmonky points out the leather on the door panels might be coming loose, which the seller acknowledges, admitting it was not previously disclosed. Moreover, there are apprehensions about the vehicle's history due to its salvage title, with @Rkeddington1973 questioning its drivability without a trailer, a concern the seller reassures regarding the vehicle's reliability. While @CK_USA probes about vibrations and oil consumption, the seller maintains that there are no significant mechanical issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments about the 2017 GLS550 highlight its well-maintained condition and extensive service history, with the seller, @DallasMotorClub, emphasizing over $14K worth of recent service completed within the last year. Many users express excitement about the vehicle's options, and @DallasMotorClub reassures potential buyers that the next owner will love the SUV. The seller is also proactive, offering personal showings for local buyers and FaceTime walkarounds for those who are not in the area, which adds a personal touch to the auction.
Neutral: Several users are engaging with @DallasMotorClub, asking practical questions about the vehicle, such as @nwong inquiring about the number of keys and accessories like headphones and remote controls. The seller responds promptly, confirming the total inventory available. Additionally, @koog asks for a video of a cold start, which @DallasMotorClub agrees to provide, illustrating a willingness to accommodate potential buyers' requests for more information.
Negative: No significant negative comments have emerged from the discussion. The overall tone remains positive, with no adverse feedback on the vehicle or the selling process. The engagement appears focused on inquiries and supportive comments rather than complaints or concerns.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @porkpiehat expressed admiration for the door trim of the vehicle, calling it 'an honest looking Alfa-GLWA.' @Knuckles-R-Busted initially noted a lack of enthusiasm towards the wheels but ended up liking them on the vehicle. They also mentioned their fondness for the door cards, demonstrating how design elements can significantly influence perceptions. Meanwhile, @CZSeventyFive stated that the door cards changed their initial negative impression of the car's color into a positive one, suggesting they would fit in at a lively event.
Neutral: @FixieCory (The Seller) introduced the auction with a personal touch, mentioning his 11-year history with the Alfa and his intention to provide updates, such as a cold start video. He also highlighted that the door cards have been universally appreciated at meet-ups, indicating their popularity. Additionally, he addressed a query from @busternine about the maintenance history, confirming he performed much of the work himself or entrusted it to a local expert and shared details of repairs and enhancements made to the vehicle.
Negative: @busternine raised concerns about the vehicle's maintenance history, questioning the timeline and whether the odometer may have rolled back under previous ownership. @Hodorek expressed interest in assessing the condition of the canvas top, implying concern over its state. @CobraKaiser also pointed out a perceived lack of driving footage, indicating that potential buyers may feel lacking in necessary information about the vehicle's performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed a lot of admiration for the vehicle, noting its appealing aesthetics and interesting modifications. @Doyler remarked on its impressive build, indicating that potential buyers would likely be very pleased with it. @imjustabill1970 also echoed this sentiment, appreciating the vehicle's overall appearance and suggesting that someone would find it to their liking. Additionally, @camp6ell proposed an easy fix for the air conditioning issue, showing their interest in the vehicle’s maintenance and condition.
Neutral: Several users sought more information regarding the vehicle's specifications and history, indicating a keen interest in its mechanical aspects but without strong opinions on its overall desirability. @HAYETHERE and @NiceRosie asked for specific details about the transmission and the legality of the engine swap in California, showing a thorough approach to understanding the vehicle's modifications. @Rockabillykid and @Sweli also inquired about its air conditioning functionality and the presence of potential rust, highlighting a practical perspective on ownership concerns.
Negative: Despite the positive comments about the vehicle, significant concerns were raised regarding its registration status in California, which poses a challenge for potential buyers. @Mtnbum noted the unfortunate inability to register the vehicle in California, which could hinder its sale. @rolitsch (The Seller) shared their frustrating experience with the Bureau of Automotive Repair blocking the vehicle's registration, revealing that they had to sell due to these legal issues. This context may dissuade potential buyers who are concerned about similar complications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Sarki describes the vehicle as the gold standard for full-size pickups, highlighting its beauty. @Nick_Eppin expresses a strong preference for this truck over any new model available, indicating a high level of satisfaction. Additional commenters like @kalcej and @Shomoil appreciate the truck's appearance and condition, with @kalcej noting features such as the AC and bed size. @convertparts shares a personal experience with their similar model, praising the durability and reliability of Toyota Tundras, stating it could become someone’s "Forever Truck."
Neutral: Various commenters have inquired about specific features and conditions of the vehicle, such as the potential frame concerns raised by @ukguy, who later retracts their doubts after observing additional photos. @ttocs6991 (The Seller) provides reassurances and clarifications regarding the truck's condition and features, including the absence of smoke odors and the installation of new parts. @iron asks about maintenance, particularly the timing belt and water pump, indicating some level of concern regarding the vehicle's upkeep but later acknowledges the work done.
Negative: Concerns were expressed by several users regarding potential maintenance issues due to the vehicle's age. @tatmetoo speculates about various components that may need attention on a 20+ year old truck, while @Luna.CA questions the cause of past damages. @pstackhouse points out specific repairs visible in the photos that are not mentioned in the Carfax report, indicating a level of skepticism about the seller's transparency. Overall, while enthusiasm for the truck is high, there are legitimate concerns about its long-term maintenance needs and history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bubbalancia noted that the car seemed worn in 2022 but appears to be in much better condition now, indicating it is a nice driver. @Knuckles-R-Busted praised the Fiat Dino as one of the best-looking four-seat coupes, applauding its aesthetics without pretentiousness. @CorvetteGuru emphasized the car's unique appeal, stating that it is underappreciated and an awesome-looking vehicle with careful details and care taken in its presentation, highlighting the charming sound of its American I-6 engine.
Neutral: @RonAvery shared that although he was initially interested in purchasing this Fiat Dino, he decided against it after conducting a compression check and estimating the costs of necessary repairs. He pointed out that while it has a nice interior and paint, the gearbox needs attention, particularly with the second gear synchro. @alexgambal (The Seller) provided information about the car's condition, mentioning the challenges of living at a high altitude affecting its carburetor and the car needing a good clean home.
Negative: @mpatty expressed concern, recalling that during a previous auction, the car did not appear to require $35,000 worth of work, indicating possible discrepancies in its condition. @Krs1 raised questions regarding potential transmission issues, suggesting the need for synchronizer work based on observing gear shifting. @RonAvery and @ITSBMW93 both highlighted that the car’s gearbox requires attention and that the vehicle presents a number of mechanical challenges that could deter potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Rotax141 describes the bike as cool and ready for action, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @Knuckles-R-Busted immediately connects the bike to the legendary stunt performer Evil Knievel, suggesting a shared sense of nostalgia about the bike's style. @NormalNorm refers to it as a 'very cool sporty' and expresses disappointment that it is located so far away, encouraging the seller with a 'Good Luck With The Auction'. @Sob1048 calls it a beautiful bike, noting its proximity to Ohio, further enhancing its appeal.
Neutral: @bobdog raises a practical concern regarding the cost of shipping motorcycles, sharing their thoughts on transport logistics from New York to Colorado. @TVETTE provides advice, recommending a shipping company they have experience with, noting that while they are reliable, the process can be slow due to their grouping practice. @Picohill asks several questions about the bike's condition, specifically inquiring about the carburetor, oil tank cleanliness, potential leaks, and overall oil issues, indicating an analytical approach to assessing its maintenance history.
Negative: @dirtbeard voices criticism about the modifications made to the engine case, suggesting the alteration to resemble a pre-unit bike lacks logic considering the sportster's design. They mention the potential for rectification with an OEM case, implying dissatisfaction with the current state of the bike. @JustaGlitch’s comment also implies a nostalgic view of Evil Knievel, possibly hinting at a lost authenticity in the modifications, though this is less overtly negative.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed appreciation for the 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser HJ47, citing its beautiful restoration and overall quality. @zwegersd described it as beautiful, while @GLCTraveler praised Griots Motors for delivering another awesome Land Cruiser rig. @Woleaga specifically loved the green leather interior, indicating a positive reception of the vehicle's aesthetic features and upgrades.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the specific details and history of the vehicle, which reflects curiosity rather than strong opinions. @Landpimp inquired about the electric power steering under the steering column, indicating interest in understanding the vehicle's features. @mrdibbles raised a question about the cost to add air conditioning, showing a practical concern for features that might be essential in different climates, especially when coming from Georgia. @Cfish requested clarity regarding the engine work reported and surface rust on the frame, indicating a balanced approach to assessing the vehicle's condition.
Negative: There were some concerns and critical comments about the vehicle's features and condition. @Cfish expressed surprise about the reported corrosion, questioning the severity, which might imply that potential buyers should be cautious. @Rottie325 highlighted what they perceived as high shop labor hours for inspections and maintenance, which could deter some buyers due to cost implications. Additionally, @stbernardy's inquiry about whether the refurbishment was done stateside or in South America pointed to a concern about the authenticity and quality of the restoration process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @clarkejw praises the car as a lovely MGA, highlighting its originality and subtle modern updates. @hueyhoolihan remarks on the beautiful color combination and outstanding appearance of the 60 spoke wire wheels, which were originally fitted. @Cabbott (The Seller) mentions that the car runs great, enjoys driving it, and provides a personal connection to its history as the first car the seller owned, emphasizing the recent freshening up for the next caretaker.
Neutral: @Cabbott (The Seller) provides clarifications about tire replacement and the spare hole in the dash, explaining that the tires were recently installed and discussing the previous windscreen washer system. There is also mention of visual inspection for prior damage, with the seller noting weld marks from past repairs, specifically around the radiator area. Additionally, @jturner and @flashgorman discuss the commonality of oil leaks in vintage cars, with the seller acknowledging the present oil leaks as typical for a 65-year-old model.
Negative: @flashgorman asks for clarification regarding the mention of oil leaks, expressing confusion about the seller's statement. @Cabbott (The Seller) readily admits that the car does leak oil, stating that no one should expect a leak-free experience from an older vehicle, yet this acknowledgment could deter some potential buyers looking for a pristine condition model. There is an implication that the slight leaks are a normal aspect of owning a classic car, which may not appeal to all prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its aesthetics and low mileage. @Spokayman expressed nostalgia, appreciating the truck as a means to relive the old days. @JWong912 found it great-looking and low-mileage, wishing the seller good luck with the transaction. Additionally, @drbigworm complimented the truck by calling it a "Beautiful Yota," and @Geeked_Sr20 detailed the extensive care and professional work that went into the paint job, highlighting the flawless execution of the restoration process.
Neutral: Several comments revolved around factual clarifications and various aspects of the truck's condition. @Geeked_Sr20, the seller, addressed comments regarding the windshield decal, explaining that it was created by a different manufacturer and could be changed if desired. There were inquiries from potential buyers regarding the documentation of the paint job, the condition of the vehicle’s underside, and additional accessories included in the sale, all of which @Geeked_Sr20 responded to with detailed insights and offered to provide more visuals and information as needed.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, issues were raised regarding the windshield decal's legitimacy, with @professor humorously noting that it suggested exaggerated dimensions of the vehicle. @Flooder pointed out video issues and sought clarity on the original head gasket. @Spokayman and others mentioned that they found the incorrect decal embarrassing, which adds a touch of critique to the truck's presentation. @Geeked_Sr20 attempted to reassure potential buyers about the truck's quality, but the decal's presence remains a point of contention.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @AnkurGT commented on the car's nice build, expressing a desire to fast-forward to the end of the sale process. @Myoldcut praised the online sale presentation and mentioned that the pictures conveyed the quality of the work done, suggesting it would bring joy to the new owner. @JackW8542 highlighted the car's exceptional quality, noting the owner's long history in restoration and dealership, affirming that this car is a standout within the TR6 community.
Neutral: @Flashpix mentioned the mechanical build quality and questioned why the engine bay wasn’t painted red, hinting at curiosity about the original color. @lnev (The Seller) clarified that the engine bay is black due to personal preference and confirmed that the original color was white, now converted to signal red. @Swede65mm inquired about the head milling and cam specifications, while @ima68tr pointed out a nice Weber conversion, noting that it could increase the value significantly if a driving video supports the dyno results.
Negative: @frankrigor raised a concern about a whine in the differential, prompting @lnev (The Seller) to explain it is due to wear in the gears. @Mallardtr6 pointed out a potential issue with the upper A-arms being reversed, which could affect camber and caster, and also raised a question about the license plate light position, suggesting it might not adhere to the specifics of the model year. @Muttsydog1 expressed interest in understanding the door check strap limitation, asking for further clarification, revealing a concern about the door's operation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @D2_S8_Daily praises the coolness of square body trucks and wishes the seller luck with the auction. @bringatrailer acknowledges the community's input by confirming that the unrelated photo has been removed, indicating responsiveness to feedback. Overall, there is a sense of appreciation for the vehicle's history and potential while highlighting the importance of community support in enhancing the auction experience.
Neutral: @CarFoolLane provides an analysis of the vehicle's features and speculates on its original purpose as a government vehicle, noting its minimal options and suggesting further investigation into its history. @Aarchambault requests the removal of confusing photos and suggests adding detailed images of crucial vehicle components to enhance buyer trust. Additionally, @BigEB and @zleist21 seek more communication from the seller regarding additional photos and requested videos.
Negative: @krrunyon1 points out discrepancies in the listing photos and raises concerns about the air conditioning and third-row brackets. @jbeeman425 criticizes the lack of photographs, especially given the vehicle's salvage title, while @TNGuy emphasizes the need for clearer information about any frame damage and suggests a driving video for potential bidders. @D2_S8_Daily also calls attention to the vehicle's inoperable headlights, which raises safety concerns, particularly in buying situations regulated by state laws.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the F-250 as a 'green and white delight' and praises its wonderful build, expressing appreciation with the comment 'GLWTA!' along with emojis. This positive sentiment highlights the aesthetic appeal and overall quality of the vehicle, suggesting that it stands out favorably among other options.
Neutral: @PM3 questions the model of the vehicle, prompting @boaboyoz to confirm that it is indeed an F-250. This exchange indicates a general conversation about the vehicle's identification and model, showing some engagement between users without strong emotional tones.
Negative: @ELROD raises a concern about the absence of an odometer reading, to which @psiegenthaler, the seller, confirms that this is correct. Additionally, @Bobzluvsoldcars requests more driving and cold-start videos to better assess the vehicle’s performance, indicating a need for more information that may not be adequately provided.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Jrqm expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it a 'beautiful car,' which positively highlights its aesthetic appeal. @Collectibleclassics, the seller, emphasized their commitment to providing unique and desirable vehicles, showcasing their high customer satisfaction rate with a solid 4.9/5.0 Google Review score. The seller also reassured potential buyers by promoting transparency in transactions and offering options for inspection, which enhances buyer confidence.
Neutral: @gwglasscock humorously noted @Jrqm's requests for pictures of tools and spare tire, hinting that such inquiries are common among car enthusiasts. @Stukinascif provided insight into the collector mindset, suggesting that having OEM pieces can affect the car's value. This highlights the importance of completeness in collector cars without casting a negative light on the vehicle itself.
Negative: @GeneG commented critically, stating that the magazine articles referenced by the seller pertain to a different car, hinting at a potential misinformation issue. Additionally, @Condor-1 inquired about the absence of the original AMG floor mats, which could make potential buyers question the car's completeness. Finally, @Romand076 raised concerns about the car's brake pad thickness and CV boot condition, indicating a need for more specific maintenance information.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @hillsdonsmith finds the sidecar motorcycle setup fun and sociable, appreciating the thumbs up from bystanders. @LuisV describes the vehicle as beautiful, further echoed by @Ant5842 who calls it a rare machine. @zangetron appreciates the uniqueness of a U.S. model with a sidecar, agreeing it's nicely done, while @lucky6600 comments on the attractive configuration. @1150EML admires the bike's beauty, adding that such models are seldom seen, and @originalbob expresses support for potential buyers and the joy of riding sidecars, highlighting the bike's appeal for enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments provide technical insights into the vehicle's specifications and compatibility, such as @nwmoto and @Collins4A who note that the bike lacks Earles forks, which are typically preferred for sidecar setups. @911r (The Seller) confirms that the bike is an R69US and provides information on the gearbox and fuel tank, clarifying its standard specifications. Commentary also discusses the bike's history and accessory options, with @Calogero inquiring about signal lights and saddlebags which could enhance the vehicle's completeness.
Negative: Concerns about the bike's safety and handling are raised by @Rbeemer, who doubts the reliability of the sidecar rig due to its setup and materials. @originalbob elaborates on the potential difficulties of handling the R69S model with a sidecar, advocating for the R50 or R60 as more suitable alternatives. Additionally, comments from @Collins4A discuss the issue of the sidecar attachments not being designed for the frame, indicating necessary adjustments for safety. @Series6 expresses skepticism about the suitability of telescoping forks for sidecar use, while @Bobroberto reflects on a past negative experience with a similar setup.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the overall appreciation for the meticulous restoration of the 1956 Porsche-Diesel 111 Tractor, with many contributors praising its aesthetics and condition. @oleguy53 commented on the tractor hitting a 'home run right out of the gate,' while @GatorDMD noted the impressive quality of the restoration. The seller, @wiusa, actively engages with the community and shares that there is a total nut and bolt restoration on the tractor, ensuring no mechanical issues which seems to boost bidders' confidence. Additionally, the inclusion of a driving video was positively received, as shown in @Alaska-60's acknowledgment of its addition.
Neutral: Several comments address operational aspects and features of the tractor, reflecting a neutral viewpoint on functionality and equipment compatibility. @Petemont mentioned that while a rotary mower would require a different type of attachment, using a sickle or trailing mower might work, albeit with some manual intervention needed during operation. @Alaska-60 also inquired about the original item that was likely in the center of the steering wheel, indicating interest in the historical details. Overall, there seems to be a balanced discussion about what the tractor can and cannot do, without strong opinions leaning towards either approval or disapproval.
Negative: A few negative sentiments surfaced regarding the seller's frequent tagging of community members in comments. @CRM925 commented on this behavior, suggesting it was excessive, though @wiusa responded defensively stating no harm was intended. Additionally, technical questions regarding the tractor's compatibility with certain attachments foresee concern for potential buyers, as indicated by @JWommy, who expressed uncertainty about the practicality of using certain equipment with the tractor's PTO. While these comments signal some reservation, they do not undermine the overall positive reception of the tractor.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @OldFishtank praised the beauty of the car, mentioning it's unfortunate that it features the low pressure 2.4L engine. @ZZZZZZZ highlighted the striking appearance of the Maya gold color, reminiscing about a similar model they had seen in town. @exizldelfuego expressed admiration for the color and shared their positive experience with a different model, noting that while the high-pressure turbo engine offers more performance, the low-pressure turbo is more enjoyable for daily driving. @jfzieg fondly recalled their own experiences with a similar car, emphasizing its beauty and amazing driving feel.
Neutral: @chromeandcelluloid, the seller, acknowledged the car's strengths but also pointed out some issues, such as cosmetic imperfections and a gauge cluster that is slow to activate. The seller actively engaged with potential buyers, responding to inquiries and showing willingness to provide additional information. They also mentioned their motivation for selling the car, as they are looking to purchase a different model for rallycross use.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car's condition, particularly by @OldFishtank, who noted the presence of what appeared to be red dust in the engine bay, questioning if it was rust. @Hearsecutor requested close-up images of scuffed areas to better assess the vehicle's condition. The seller had to reassure potential buyers that the red dust was likely an artifact from the photos rather than actual rust, but these inquiries reflect worries about the car's upkeep and meticulousness regarding its condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the car's appealing condition, with @Jhammond198 and @Tom_S. noting its beauty and excellent appearance. @Miatadon appreciates that the car may have original BRG paint in key areas, suggesting it could be an original and unrusted MGB. @MGBboy mentions the potential for a good sale price based on current bids, and overall, there is a friendly atmosphere wishing @KSeideman (The Seller) luck in the auction.
Neutral: Commenters like @kkay, @MGB6, and @Ganjoka provide constructive suggestions, emphasizing the need for more detailed photos of the car's underside and critical areas to gauge its condition better. They inquire about the engine number and technical specifications, while @mlg2323 requests additional details regarding a specific area of potential concern. These insights aim at aiding the seller in providing more relevant information to potential buyers.
Negative: On the downside, @tailpipe raises concerns about the auction's no-reserve status, suggesting that the lack of detailed photos makes it risky to bid. @MGB6 also points out a potential oversight with the turn signal lenses, indicating another area for improvement. The request for various photos and a possible video highlights skepticism amongst some buyers regarding fully understanding the vehicle's condition, possibly affecting seller credibility.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @TylerS725 mentions that the vehicle is a perfect spec, while @Dlnlnn9 expresses excitement, stating "Wow, what a Z!" Additionally, @patrickh101 appreciates the final year of the C7, noting upgrades from the upcoming ZR-1, suggesting that this vehicle stands out among the C7s. @Crovet praises the Shadow Gray color as the best gray, further highlighting the appealing aesthetic features of the car.
Neutral: Several commenters ask questions related to the vehicle's specifications and history. @swilliams4 inquires about a possible second owner and requests more information regarding the window sticker and factory options. @2006m5 asks about the color name and the possibility of close-up images of the driver's seat bolster. Meanwhile, @Highstakes and @Factoid discuss the sales tax implications based on the registration state, which is a common concern for buyers.
Negative: @brianspence raises concerns regarding the interior, specifically asking if there is any odor suggesting previous smoking. Additionally, @drodga01 questions whether the vehicle has ever been on the track, which could impact its appeal to potential purchasers. @sixt7L36 also mentions that inquiries about track history often circulate but insists that such details don't necessarily affect the car's performance or condition, implying some skepticism about the importance of that factor.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received high praise for its excellent overall condition and engaging driving experience. @the_patina_group noted that the car is fun to drive, comfortable, and offers practical space, making it enjoyable for different types of owners. Many users, such as @Bullish and @Ernie60, complimented the aesthetic appeal, highlighting the beauty of its design and the well-done restoration work that includes rechromed trim, which @PWSchuh mentioned improved its look significantly. Furthermore, comments expressing admiration for the unique shooting brake design and the vehicle's striking color were prevalent, adding to its desirability among classic car enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments expressed curiosity about the car’s features and specifications, with questions regarding the exhaust system placement raised by @DeanBean, and @microshaft confirming similar experiences with their own 1800E. Users like @VolvoDoug and @billykdf engaged in discussions about the car's color and how it compared to original specifications, indicating interest without expressing strong sentiments either way. Additionally, @jvan20p mentioned practical concerns, such as tire sizes and the stance of the car, which could matter for potential buyers considering its suitability for driving.
Negative: Some concerns about specific details of the vehicle were noted in discussion. @mettelman raised questions about the car's mileage documentation due to inconsistencies in service records, indicating skepticism about its accurate history. Further, @SaabFan expressed doubts about the steering responsiveness, suggesting it might feel vague based on driving footage, which could deter some potential buyers. Additionally, @Shanemccammon inquired about the functionality of the rear seatbelt, implying that not all features may be in perfect working order, while @jinvermont pressed about the state of particular engine components, reflecting a thorough consideration of the car's operational reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with many commenters praising its stunning build and attention to detail. @BR_549 described it as 'stunning' and 'tastefully done,' while @RPChan called it 'beautiful' and noted its potential for great fun on long drives. @Argenrican emphasized the meticulous craftsmanship, referring to it as a 'rolling work of art', and @24hrslemans highlighted the seller as a passionate enthusiast, adding to the car's appeal.
Neutral: Some comments focused on technical aspects and specifications of the vehicle. @toddpohaku asked about a drive test and the motor sound, indicating interest in its performance. @Tags6369 inquired about the computer module's placement and the speedometer's functionality regarding kilometers and miles per hour. The exchange highlighted the practical considerations potential buyers would need to address, such as handling and driving comfort.
Negative: There were a few concerns raised about specific features of the vehicle. @biker_60 remarked on the speedometer, pointing out it only goes up to 125 KPH, which could lead to estimates for speeds beyond that. @RussMcD3 expressed confusion about the speedometer's design choices, questioning the practicality of having such limited speed measurement. @Jimmy_P suggested modifications for track days, indicating that the current setup might not be ideal for performance driving.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: There are several positive comments regarding the 2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302 Laguna Seca, with @Tobyallen emphasizing the car's factory performance. @2FAM, the seller, highlights the vehicle's impressive features such as low mileage, factory Recaro seats, and the unique rear X-brace which is exclusive to the Laguna Seca package. Commenters also express excitement about the vehicle's design and performance capabilities, particularly appreciating the opportunity to bring such a high-performance vehicle to auction.
Neutral: While discussing the details of the Boss 302 Laguna Seca, several users seek clarification on specifics regarding the model itself and the accuracy of its production numbers. @4drhtrd noted the absence of a designation indicating it is a Laguna Seca model, which could potentially affect its value. Additionally, the seller, @2FAM, identified the vehicle's features and offered to provide further details upon request, showing transparency in the sale process.
Negative: Some commenters voiced concerns about the accuracy of the production numbers provided by various sources. @PP0001 criticized the reliability of the figures, stating that previous listings might be misleading. Questions were raised regarding the car's details, including the activation status of the TracKey and the presence of original equipment, reflecting uncertainty that could hinder potential buyers' confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlighted the impressive features and specifications of the 2014 Porsche Cayenne Turbo S, emphasizing its luxurious design and powerful performance. @siegelng praised it as a 'pristine example', while @Barryward and @bmdaia expressed admiration for the vehicle and its allure, reinforcing the idea that owning this Cayenne would elevate one's status. @Alfordsville specifically appreciated the unique white seats and the attention to detail with options like the $1500 walnut handles, indicating that the car's aesthetics were particularly appealing.
Neutral: Commenters engaged in discussions about the bidding activity and the overall auction process, with @PCCCANADA noting unusual bidding patterns and @ozinus raising concerns regarding potential bot bidding. Additionally, several inquiries about specific features were made, including requests for more photos and videos, which suggests an active interest in thorough evaluation before bidding. @Bad_Chadi, the seller, addressed various queries, including confirmation about the replacement of the transfer case and informative responses regarding additional vehicle features and shipping options.
Negative: On a less positive note, some commenters expressed skepticism about certain aspects of the auction, with @PCCCANADA and @ozinus questioning the legitimacy of bidding and potential mechanical issues. @clark1012 pointed out specific concerns about visible scuffs and scratches on the vehicle, indicating that there might be a need for cosmetic repairs. Overall, while the comments largely highlighted admiration for the vehicle, the concerns regarding auction integrity and the car’s condition created a sense of caution among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the vehicle, citing its beauty and timeless design. @Bmyers5525 exclaims it’s a "beautiful example," while @Moocowcars reflects on memories tied to the car's classic styling, wishing modern vehicles would draw inspiration from it. @trotkis calls it a "real beaut," and @libertylaker shares that cars like this are no longer made, praising its smoothness and reliability. Additionally, @OrlyB finds the condition of this particular 171K vehicle exceptional, noting the original paint job and the meticulous care it’s received over the years. Overall, there’s a strong admiration for the car's design, comfort, and overall quality.
Neutral: Some comments express curiosity and a desire for more information about the vehicle's functionality. @Z3fan1 inquires about any potential issues with the car, while @SiHawk asks about the operability of the window and lock switches. Commenters like @PNW19 are also interested in seeing videos demonstrating the car's features, with requests for cold starts and driving footage. @Mcfly1985, the seller, is proactive in addressing these concerns, promising to provide videos of the car's functionality and detailing the logistics of posting them. This indicates a willingness to engage with potential buyers and offer transparency regarding the vehicle's condition.
Negative: There are a couple of comments that point out personal preferences and minor critiques. @CousinDave360 wishes the car had a manual transmission, reflecting a desire for a more engaged driving experience. @BrokeJoke also expresses a wish for a third pedal, indicating that some enthusiasts might prefer more traditional, driver-centric features. @Craven adds a note of skepticism regarding the need for a clutch in a premium four-door car, suggesting a divide in preferences among car enthusiasts. While these comments highlight a desire for specific features, they do not detract significantly from the overall positive perception of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ddama1 praises the car for being beautiful and appreciates its automatic transmission feature. @Paulhas describes the vehicle as a beauty, noting its excellent driving performance on the freeway and receiving frequent thumbs up from other drivers. Furthermore, @bhashemi123 mentions the vehicle drives beautifully and offers leg room for taller individuals. @Paulhas also highlights the powerful new crate motor, valued at over $30k, which has less than 500 miles of use, enhancing the car's appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @mike_rockwell, @kjd0505, and @piros1, ask questions regarding the vehicle's features, such as air conditioning and its handling on long trips. @bhashemi123 responds to these inquiries, indicating that the car does not have air conditioning, but there is ample leg and headroom despite its chop-top design. Comments also express interest in seeing a driving video of the car, and the vehicle's history is questioned due to the number of owners in a short time.
Negative: Concerns are raised by @mike_rockwell regarding the potential for damage to the fiberglass body during long highway trips, which could affect the vehicle's appearance. Additionally, @Lewis63 poses a question about whether the car overheats while driving in the city, to which @Paulhas reassures that it runs great and has recently undergone maintenance to prevent overheating. Overall, while most comments focus on the car's appeal, potential buyers express some hesitation about its practicality and reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @LaFlamaBlanca22 (The Seller) confirmed that the air conditioning and horn are fully functional, as well as ensuring that there is no rust underneath the vehicle. The car originates from California and Georgia, meaning it hasn’t been exposed to salt, which generally helps maintain its condition. Additionally, the seller stated that the sunroof is closed and watertight, and the sunroof motor is operational, indicating a strong level of confidence in the car's functionality.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed curiosity about the vehicle's features, with @RobertF inquiring about the air conditioning and possible rust, and @youngclassics asking about the functionality of the horn, noting concerns about torn brackets in the photos. @Imright asked about the sunroof and stereo, while @Jonfrancis raised questions about the sunroof's watertightness, the status of the timing chain, and other aspects like the functionality of the pop-up lights. Overall, there seems to be interest in the car's operational capabilities and potential additional issues that could affect its usability.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Jonfrancis regarding the sunroof, questioning its overall integrity and watertightness. There was also apprehension about the missing roof strip and whether these issues would hinder driving the car to South Florida without problems. Although some commenters were hopeful about the car's merits, reservations about the sunroof and potential repairs cast a shadow over its esteem, especially with the mention that some internal components of the sunroof might no longer be available from BMW, complicating repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Oldhockyplayr comments that the NSX is a fantastic automobile, praising its restoration back to near-original condition, and expresses hope that it will fetch a fair auction price reflecting its true value. @birenbose highlights how original and well-presented the vehicle is, calling it an excellent supercar that was groundbreaking upon its release in the late 1990s. @Tyracious enthusiastically admires the car for its simplicity and performance, indicating a preference for its classic appeal without modern complications.
Neutral: @911r (The Seller) clarifies the car's ownership and conditions, explaining that it has been serviced in 2021 with minimal mileage accrued since, and assures that photos of the paint without edits will be provided. @Chene91 seeks further information about the vehicle's maintenance history and addresses concerns regarding potential paint overspray and service records. Several participants, including @Aubrey and @JC927, engage in discussion about the car's color, previous auction history, and disclose their thoughts on the vehicle's value and potential issues.
Negative: @johnnyschelaq raises concerns over the car's past theft, prioritizing this over the paint wrap issue and expressing skepticism that any flaws will be properly disclosed. @Toptime79 indicates uncertainty about the vehicle's condition post-wrap removal and stresses the importance of complete service documentation, hinting at doubt regarding the seller's transparency. @Chene91 expresses confusion about the service routine post-2021 and questions the car's upkeep, suggesting a need for regular maintenance even under limited usage.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle’s design and performance, hailing it as a fun and unique roadster. @2b2 shares excitement about their experience, stating the TT is great for modifying and hot-rodding. @IMissMySaab appreciates the car not just for its performance but also for the enjoyment it brings to their spouse. @Honda4me, the seller, highlights the car's maintenance history, emphasizing that it has been garaged and cared for meticulously, including essential service updates like a timing belt change. The overall sentiment suggests that the Audi TT is a beloved choice among its owners.
Neutral: Some commenters engage in practical discussions regarding specific features and maintenance aspects of the car. @CalBoiler raises questions about potential issues with the rear window and requests additional photographs for verification. @erich_aux and @Bid4Real contribute insights about the wind deflector, sharing experiences of replacing the drive belt and offering instructions for others considering the same task. @Honda4me reassures interested buyers of the vehicle's readiness for new ownership and invites further questions regarding specifics or shipping details, maintaining a welcoming and informative auction environment.
Negative: There are mentions of potential issues with the vehicle that could concern some buyers, particularly relating to the wind deflector and the rear window's integrity, as noted by @CalBoiler. @Bid4Real points out the uneven raising of the wind deflector, indicating a mechanical failure that needs attention, while also adding practical information about the replacement process. @2b2 expresses their own challenges with an earlier model's roof mechanism, showcasing a potential downside for those unfamiliar with maintenance needs on the TT, which could deter some prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, noting its unique characteristics. @grnelson3 found the Escalade nice, while @rockyoneal appreciated its low miles and cool design. @Jpeter275 highlighted the collectibility of the hybrid model due to its limited factory decals, suggesting that these features make it a great buy. @lionsfan54 praised the fuel efficiency, stating that the 20 MPG city was impressive for the time compared to competitors like Toyota. Overall, the high reliability of the 6.0 engine was emphasized by @genevamotorcars (The Seller), making it a favorable option for buyers.
Neutral: Some comments included questions about the vehicle's features and specifics. @UscPhd97_ inquired about the air conditioning and the wear date on the tires, while @fbi_sam asked if the vehicle had a heated steering wheel and where the 3rd row seats were located. Other commenters sought clarification about the type of transmission and the presence of third-row seats, with @mwagner10702 providing corrections regarding the transmission type, stating it’s a 4-speed hybrid system. Additionally, @DennyMatthew pointed out a possible problem with the muffler, prompting a clarification from the seller about normal carbon deposits.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects, some commenters expressed concerns or dissatisfaction. @Thetatebaumercollection mentioned potential costs of replacing the hybrid battery, while @SCHOLAR criticized the appearance of the hybrid decals, expressing a desire to remove them. @rockyoneal noted a personal dislike for CVT transmissions, which led to some mixed sentiments regarding the hybrid system. Furthermore, @tom1953 seemed uncertain about the battery replacement history, raising questions about whether it pertained to the main hybrid battery. Overall, while the vehicle has its admirers, there are also significant reservations among some commenters.
![]() |



























































































































































