Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the vehicle, with several users praising its beauty and rarity. @Thetatebaumercollection expressed that it is a stunning and rare car, potentially worth much more than its original MSRP. Users like @Njja and @boaboyoz highlighted the car's aesthetic qualities, mentioning its unique color and exquisite condition. Commenters like @jsilver212 and @ryanhmusic also noted the desirability of the car and its impressive driving experience, further emphasizing the vehicle’s allure as a collectible piece.
Neutral: Several comments raised concerns about the driving techniques shown in the video, with discussions revolving around proper shifting methods and the effect on vehicle maintenance. User @jsilver212 questioned the driving style as potentially damaging to the clutch and gearbox, while @cpecos and @Rdmcpherson commented on the significance of rev-matching and synchro performance. The seller, @Matt_Cohen, responded to these concerns by detailing the car's maintenance history and its careful handling, aiming to reassure potential bidders considering the vehicle.
Negative: Conversely, there was considerable criticism surrounding the driving video, with multiple users expressing discomfort while watching it. @flat6911pm and @CJIIIFS remarked on the harshness of the driving style, suggesting it could lead to premature wear on the clutch. @Indyheel and @goodcad lamented the potential negative impact of such a video on the car's value, highlighting that it could deter serious buyers. Comments from @av12345 and @DHunter also pointed out the controversy regarding the clutch's condition and the driving habits displayed, indicating a divide in opinions on how these factors may affect the sale.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the Lancia Delta Integrale, highlighting its stunning beauty and rarity. @Porsche1931 described it as a dream car while @AlfaDave appreciated its stealthy appearance in white, saying, "OMG, I love this car!" The condition of the vehicle drew praise as well, with @GSAudio stating that it appears to be in pristine shape, and several commenters, including @boaboyoz and @GDogg, found it to be spectacular. Additionally, the car's service history and low mileage were mentioned as significant factors contributing to its desirability, making it a sought-after collector's item.
Neutral: The seller, @McDeeb, provided detailed insights into the car's history, including its unique build as one of the last produced and its Japanese importation before arriving in the U.S. Commenters were curious about state registration processes, particularly in California, and shared their experiences or sought advice on this, including @Carterrrrrrr and @danielbruce who discussed registration hurdles. The community showed a lively engagement regarding the auction, with mention of live streams and the closing time, indicating excitement but also a practical approach to the auction process.
Negative: There were some inquiries regarding potential flaws or concerns about the vehicle. @Djminvestments raised questions about modifications and any cosmetic imperfections, and there were discussions about paint readings and possible repairs, with @mbrandonmotorcars highlighting natural variances in paint application during production. Although these concerns were noted, they did not seem to overshadow the overall positive reception the integrale received, with many emphasizing the differences as part of the car's character rather than significant detractors.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @DieselM333 expressed admiration for the GT3 RS, stating, "there’s no substitute!!!" @wigglenator referred to it as an "amazing machine." @boaboyoz complimented the car, calling it a "sensational Sacramento (!) 992 GT3 RS Weissach" and noted its impressive build, while @GatorDMD exclaimed, "Screamer!!!" @BenCeccarelli recognized the car's specifications as cool and strategically designed for weight savings, while also praising its color as perfect, despite the less-than-ideal photo conditions.
Neutral: Comments from @PorscheSacramento (The Seller) revealed that the window sticker and build sheet were to be uploaded shortly to aid the sale. They pointed out that the car, although showing delivery miles, is previously titled and comes with a two-year Certified Pre-Owned Porsche warranty if sold to a non-dealership buyer. The seller clarified the photos were taken at their dealership, helping potential buyers understand the context behind the listing.
Negative: Commenters expressed concerns regarding the treatment of such beautiful vehicles as commodities. @CarlStringer lamented, "Hate to see such wonderful driving machines treated as a commodity just to make money on," while @DKH8 suggested that the car could have been better spec'd with an extended fuel tank and upgraded sound. @Mandinga humorously noted that it probably still has the "original" gas in the tank, while @2006m5 was surprised that the dealer couldn't sell it in-house, implying a lack of customer engagement despite the car's appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning design and quality. @flyingbrick242 simply stated, "WOW!!" while @ntbd4 noted that the car looks much better without stripes. @DeuceSevenoff and @Daytona88dc defended the authenticity of the Shelby signature, affirming that the signature is certified and the car is a licensed Shelby replica. @gorgipark (The Seller) also received positive feedback on their auction efforts, with @Pettyfan43 praising the build quality and predicting strong auction success. Valuable discussions about the car's specifications and driving experience further reflected a genuine appreciation from the community.
Neutral: Several commenters touched on details about the car's build and features without expressing strong opinions. @90sundevil asked about the car's history, and @BigFrank inquired about the pedal placement for taller drivers, with @gorgipark (The Seller) clarifying the pedal arrangement. @Rzane expressed curiosity about adding power steering post-build, which was addressed by @lloyddon1, mentioning the practicality of doing so. Discussions about the shifting technique of the vehicle emerged as multiple users, such as @Alfred and @Molae65, requested insights into the driving style showcased in videos shared by @gorgipark (The Seller).
Negative: There were some criticisms regarding the authenticity of the vehicle and the signature on the glove box, primarily initiated by @Astonman76, who claimed this could be considered fraudulent. This sparked a defensive dialogue among users like @DeuceSevenoff and @Daytona88dc, who countered that the signature was legitimate and clearly distinguishes itself from original models. Concerns about functionality related to features like pedal placement and shifting technique also appeared, with @DWRAT questioning the necessity of rev-matching on upshifts. Additionally, the lack of a top and side windows as noted by @Quicksilveracengines could deter potential buyers seeking more traditional features.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @the_patina_group conveys a strong belief in the quality of the car being sold, emphasizing that cars which are driven and properly maintained often prove to be the most satisfying to own. The seller notes that despite higher mileage, the car performs exceptionally well, boasting a tight suspension, a powerful engine, and a pristine interior. Commenters such as @bill930p and @Caymanorcarrera express fondness for the vehicle, highlighting that it looks better than expected for its mileage and reflects the advantages of a well-loved 997.2.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Cooper1386 and @texaco, provide insights on the car's features, mentioning modifications like the swapped 19" turbo wheels and admiring the quality of the photography. @David_in_CT shares his past experience with the car, indicating that it was well-maintained during his ownership, and @5Wolf3 inquires about any potential odors within the vehicle. @94delica expresses interest in purchasing the car for long trips, while @sacfitz considers using it for daily drives, showcasing varied perspectives on its usability.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the car's history and mechanical components, particularly about the earlier PDK systems which prompted @5Wolf3 to inquire about maintenance records and reliability given the mileage. @Design_Build and @TriplePPP question aspects of the car's accident history and potential damage, with discussions about previous bodywork. Additionally, the mention of a crease in the front bumper cover and previous overheating issues adds to the scrutiny of the vehicle, though @the_patina_group provides reassurances about the car's condition after repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors such as @Mike_Breinin and @BloodyHell praised the vehicle's aesthetic, noting that few cars display box flares as impressively as an Alfa. @Ratedarrgh called the car beautiful despite the mixed engine and badging, while @Slam105 expressed a lack of any criticisms, labeling it a 'knock-out.' The seller @FantasyJunction shared insights into the vehicle's construction, highlighting extensive efforts by experienced restorers, and showcasing the fun and engagement drivers can expect from this model. @Av8rboy58 added that it is a blast to drive and well thought out, contributing to its appeal.
Neutral: Some comments were more questioning or observational rather than outright critical or praiseworthy. For example, @Lysandr inquired about the EPA standards, while @BigGar expressed confusion about emissions exemptions for pre-1975 cars, leading to clarifications from the seller regarding its registration in Montana. @psheets772 sought clarity on the interior size of the vehicle, indicating interest but also concern over comfort due to their height. Concerns about the technical aspects and standards were balanced with a general interest in the car's features and driving experience.
Negative: Criticism surfaced, notably from @seanrussell and @MGB6 regarding the car's apparent lack of oil pressure, raising alarms over potential mechanical issues. @kartcrg brought up concerns about the grill's condition and questioned the reliability of the GTAm look without adequate mechanical support. Others like @herrmatt also expressed skepticism about the vehicle's exemption status and its licensing details. Overall concerns were noted about structural integrity and potential rust, with @JonBod emphasizing the need for clarity on rust issues that could affect the vehicle's usability and safety.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Highlander63 praised the vehicle's appearance, labeling it as a great-looking 1965 Mustang and appreciated the air conditioning installed, contrasting it positively with Chevrolet's less impressive A/C in the Chevy II. @SingleClutch shared fond memories of learning to drive on a Mustang, emphasizing the positive bonding experience it provided with their father and suggesting that the modest power is good for newer drivers. The seller, @LuckySailor76, provided details indicating that the car is primarily in good condition, assuring potential buyers that all gauges, lights, and windows operate well and that the vehicle has been stored properly for many years, presenting it as a well-maintained survivor.
Neutral: @LuckySailor76 clarified several inquiries regarding the Mustang's components, confirming that it does have manual windows and that the tires, while old, are functional. He provided background information on the vehicle, stating that he is the second owner and detailing its history of storage on Virginia's Eastern Shore. @Kens1963 inquired about whether the vehicle has a power top, while @Packard8 asked about the age of the tires and whether the usual fluids had been recently changed, reflecting a general interest in the car's upkeep without particular opinions.
Negative: Concerns about potential mechanical issues were raised by @CarFoolLane, who questioned the window mechanisms specifically due to the convertible being photographed with the top down but windows up, suggesting it could indicate a problem. @JB423 expressed worries about possible rust or filler in the bodywork based on the photographs, wondering if the lower fenders were in good condition. @Packard8's questions about the original fuel tank and shocks hint at potential worries about the age and reliability of vital components, while @broodie agreed with @CarFoolLane's concerns over the convertible's window position in the photos.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors like @nvermet express a strong appreciation for the 2006 Arnage T, stating that it's a great car for both short and long trips and highlighting its reliability with just annual maintenance needed. They describe it as a 'rolling man cave' and wish the seller good luck with the sale. @Mark_Kudra praises the car's stunning appearance, especially in black, and likens it to Sean Connery, suggesting it's better looking than its counterparts like the Flying Spur and Mulsanne. They also commend the impressive torque and driving experience, estimating that the car could fetch between $30k to $35k, emphasizing its value.
Neutral: The @the_patina_group (The Seller) provides detailed insights about the car's condition and history, noting that it has a strong presence and remains clean and well-kept years after its release. They mention that the car's performance is still impressive and that there are no major issues noted from their personal experience driving the vehicle. Additionally, they clarify questions raised by potential buyers about previous sales, maintenance records, and the vehicle's specifications, while openly inviting further inquiries.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the car's maintenance history and the lack of records. @MarlonBrando points out the absence of detailed service information between 2012 and 2020, suggesting that the car may have unverified maintenance from that period. @MEGuide warns that while the Arnage T is a lovely car, potential buyers should not overlook the importance of a full set of maintenance records, as this is a high-maintenance vehicle that requires careful ownership to ensure reliability. @Drdodger questions the seller's vague assurance that everything works, implying a need for more clear communication regarding the car's functionality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @19Willys46 describes the car as very nice looking, and @Tjwuphill100 considers it a great example, estimating its value at around $70k. @nathanbat calls it a beauty with low miles, while @Jbleland praises its appearance, noting its gorgeous design and asking for operational details. @69_911e highlights the rare color combination and low mileage, and @sl600 calls it a beautiful time capsule. Overall, many commenters appreciate the car's aesthetics and rarity.
Neutral: @autocentroimports (The Seller) engages with the audience, providing updates on the car and insights regarding its features, including the mechanical work done and paint details. They note that the car has a rare factory rear seat option and emphasize the car's museum-quality status. @DoodleBoy asks for clarifications about the paintwork, which @autocentroimports addresses by referencing @nathanbat's comment about the pinstriping, thus promoting community interaction.
Negative: Some comments lean toward skepticism. @mayart questions the existence of a factory rear seat option and asks for verification through option codes, suggesting a need for further proof regarding the car's specifications. @mdsmds inquires about the functionality of the central locking and antenna, hinting at concerns about the car's operational reliability. Overall, while the car garners admiration, there are concerns raised that point to the need for transparency and confirmation of certain features.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 2000 Hummer H1 is receiving a lot of positive attention from potential buyers. @Flyplanes5 expressed enthusiasm for the truck and appreciated its location, indicating a keen interest in the vehicle. @1lotus1 acknowledged the significant improvements made to the Hummer since their previous ownership, highlighting that it is now FAR better than before. Additionally, @Vander (The Seller) emphasized the extensive upgrades totaling over $32,000, assuring buyers of the vehicle's enhanced quality over the last four years.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's condition and specifications have been informative. @superfluous inquired about known issues, to which @Vander (The Seller) clarified that there are no major problems, only a disconnected CTIS. Several measurements were discussed with @Flyplanes5, including the height and width of the vehicle, demonstrating an openness to buyer concerns. This information helps clarify details for potential bidders and enhances transparency about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Some comments suggest a lack of interest in the pricing of the Hummer. @GrandmaGilmore expressed disbelief at how cheap these vehicles still are, implying that the market value may not reflect the quality of the Hummer. @1lotus1 noted the oddity of seeing a car relisted on BaT, hinting at concerns about the demand or potential issues with the vehicle's sale. Such comments point towards skepticism among some observers regarding the overall desirability and pricing of the Hummer.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors have expressed admiration for the 1954 Chevrolet Corvette, highlighting it as a stunning representation of the Corvette brand's launch. @GreggC mentioned that this model is a significant piece of automotive history which should receive the recognition it deserves in the auction market. The enthusiasm and dedication of the team at Autosport Designs, represented by @racer355, were also well noted, with their offer to facilitate inspections and provide detailed information, which builds trust with potential buyers.
Neutral: Several practical inquiries were made regarding the vehicle, such as the availability of top bows and front license plate brackets. @rockg and @vintageace67 posed these questions alongside requests for the car's prior ownership and service details. @MikeC2 engaged in a discussion about the costs associated with finding and restoring components like the soft-top frame, showing an active interest in the vehicle's potential restoration needs and community support for such projects.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, some concerns surfaced regarding the availability of certain parts. @rockg expressed disappointment at the absence of the top bows, indicating limitations on usability. @MikeC2 also raised concerns about the high cost associated with finding a soft-top frame, implying that restoration could be financially burdensome, which could deter some potential buyers. Additionally, the auction's current trends were mentioned, with @GreggC noting a lack of financial appreciation for these original cars, hinting at broader market issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The overall response to the Black 2004 Mercedes SL500 is largely positive, with @baxterschicken (The Seller) expressing great enthusiasm for the vehicle, stating that it is a beast to drive and ideal for summer enjoyment. Many comments also highlight the quality of the car's driving experience, with @baxterschicken noting that he has had numerous fantastic experiences with it. Additionally, the convertible top and main driving functions appear to work well, providing assurance to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries made by potential buyers, such as @acad23 and @maxtrader, address specific concerns and features of the vehicle. @acad23 raised a question about the battery drain issue, while @maxtrader inquired about the originality of the paint. @baxterschicken confirmed that the paint is original and provided some details regarding the vehicle's measurements and minor issues, including the need for oil and a cracked rear trunk light. These comments reflect a more technical side of the discussion, focusing on maintenance and care rather than pure enthusiasm or negativity.
Negative: On the downside, there are notable concerns regarding the vehicle, particularly the persistent battery drain issue that @baxterschicken mentioned stems from the air pump system. This problem could be a significant inconvenience for the next buyer if not addressed properly. Furthermore, while the engine runs well under normal conditions, it has been reported to have a small ticking sound that needs attention. @baxterschicken recommended treating the car with care, as it is an older model, and noted some minor cosmetic issues, like the missing lid for the passenger sun visor mirror and the necessity to replace the cracked trunk light.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters generally agree that the vehicle, a Porsche 928, is visually appealing, particularly in its Grand Prix White exterior coupled with a preserved brown leather interior. @PlanC appreciates the sleek look without rub strips, and @linderpat echoes this sentiment, highlighting the combination as striking. @prescue shares his positive personal experience with a similar model, noting its head-turning design and daily usability, which adds to the car's allure. The seller, @the_patina_group, emphasizes the car's mechanical reliability and recent service, which has further instilled confidence in potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments indicate curiosity about the vehicle's condition and recent history. @Bratspeed asks for updates since the last sale, to which @the_patina_group responds that the car is being relisted in the same condition. @Urbanista inquires about the functionality of the air conditioning, for which the seller confirms it is fully operational with R134A refrigerant. There are also mentions of the car being an early model, with @prescue noting that the design is considered pure and lacks some later modifications.
Negative: Some comments express concerns regarding the car's mechanical aspects. @TellMetheKnownFlaws asks if a compression test has been done, while also referencing a potential issue with crankshaft adjustment. @the_patina_group assures them that the engine is running strong without any issues and that the particular crankshaft concern does not apply to this model. However, the necessity for potential buyers to arrange a third-party inspection is acknowledged, which may raise some apprehensions for prospective bidders.
![]() |
| |
Positive: Commenters greatly admire the vehicle's history and design, with @billyblyth highlighting its significant place among the Arnolt-Bristol cars and its transformation from a rough state to a stunning restore. Contributions from @sludgo and @Starkermann describe the car as a 'jewelbox' and recognize the costly restoration that has contributed to its current condition. Enthusiastic remarks such as 'Gorgeous, GLWTA' from @sludgo and @theforce88's 'beautiful car, good luck' reflect a warm appreciation for its aesthetic.
Neutral: Some comments offer neutral observations about the vehicle's similarities to other classic cars. @Jimmyblues1959 compares it to the Lotus Elan, noting a resemblance, while @Type44 suggests it has characteristics reminiscent of the Jaguar E-type. @Knuckles-R-Busted humorously reflects on his initial confusion about the car's appearance, while @Valiantjim provides an informative perspective on the term 'bolide,' linking it to the car's rarity and unique stature without expressing a strong personal preference.
Negative: A few comments express skepticism about the auction dynamics and the vehicle's market appeal. @billyblyth mentions concerns regarding declining prices in the car market, highlighting the challenge of finding the right collector for such a unique vehicle. Additionally, @Carrera4.0's comment 'Back to the drawing board, dilettantes!' suggests potential disappointment over the auction's pace or participant behavior, while @nickh11 remarks on the slow nature of the auction, indicating a less than enthusiastic sentiment regarding the bidding process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the impressive features of the Ducati 1299 Superleggera, such as its carbon monocoque frame and titanium components, which enhance both performance and aesthetics. @johnnyb11 expressed enthusiasm by stating, "What more could you want?" while @Zxreed noted its rarity as the first of its kind to be auctioned on Bring A Trailer, suggesting that this could lead to a significant bidding war due to its high MSRP of $80,000. Additionally, @LLZ1921 (The Seller) confirms the bike is in excellent condition with no blemishes, further reinforcing its desirability among collectors and enthusiasts alike.
Neutral: There are also some practical inquiries regarding the bike's service history and included accessories. @csilver1 requested service records, to which @LLZ1921 (The Seller) responded that prior maintenance, such as oil changes and a new battery, was conducted by the previous owner but records are not available. There was a discussion about whether the bike's special accessories, including the racing screen and complete exhaust, were included, which @LLZ1921 addressed by confirming the race exhaust is installed but other parts like the black box and stock exhaust are not available.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects, concerns about the absence of service records were raised by @Meccanica, emphasizing that typically, collectors prize pristine documentation for high-value bikes. @Meccanica also pointed out that many owners usually maintain thorough records, indicating a possible lapse in the bike's service history. Furthermore, @LoudNotFast noted that potential bidders might seek assurance regarding the bike's operating features, like traction and wheelie control, suggesting a need for verification before purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Jbtsurf expressed appreciation for the unique paint color of the WRX, noting how it changes beautifully under different lighting conditions, which the seller's photos captured well. @uq2015sti, the seller, provided detailed insights about the vehicle's history, mentioning it has been garage-kept, well-maintained with only low-stress miles, and had meticulous service records. The seller highlighted key features like a flexible fuel system and upgraded sound system, emphasizing the car's comfort and reliability, as well as its excellent handling thanks to the professionally balanced suspension.
Neutral: @uq2015sti explained their reasons for selling the vehicle, citing a transition to home-based work and low usage over recent years, leading to the decision to part with it. The seller confirmed that the car has never undergone extreme driving conditions like racing or tracking and has only served as a family-friendly vehicle, capable of accommodating various activities with kids. Several commenters, including @Micbravo, inquired about maintenance specifics and expressed interest in the car's overall condition, revealing a common curiosity about the modifications and service history.
Negative: While there were no outright negative comments regarding the vehicle, there were suggestions from @Micbravo that the next owner might benefit from some track or autocross experiences to fully utilize the car's potential. The seller acknowledged this, stating that the car is capable and ready for such activities if desired, but reassured that it has been expertly maintained to avoid potential issues, including proactive clutch assessments. Overall, the sentiment leaned more positive, with no significant criticisms presented.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the Jeep for its quality and performance, with @MexicoJoe noting that it is one of the best Jeeps ever made. @jambk expressed admiration for the Jeep's condition after the recent updates, stating it was like a brand-new vehicle and highlighted its beautiful color. @MrTime (The Seller) provided thorough explanations about the vehicle's service history, detailing the extensive work done to ensure it's in great shape, greatly reassuring potential buyers.
Neutral: The discussion around the vehicle included questions regarding the drivetrain replacements and the previous ownership history. @cas123 remarked on the engine and transmission replacements that occurred during the brief ownership period, while @SanJuaner raised concerns about the need for such extensive work on a vehicle with low mileage. @DaddyDeuce and @MrTime (The Seller) addressed misreported features in the vehicle's description, highlighting the possible confusion over its specifications.
Negative: Several commenters expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition and the previous seller's transparency. @stevefi12345 suggested that the prior seller might have offloaded a problem onto BaT, while @lucky12345678910 questioned the justification for the extensive repairs in such a short time. Concerns were raised about the potential for undisclosed issues, as @Moepoe pointed out the high price at which the vehicle was sold before requiring the engine replacement.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @gmehrguth (The Seller) noted that the car performs remarkably well, stating it has been modified to deliver a superb driving experience with a significant boost in power to about 432hp. Many commenters, including @GatorDMD, expressed excitement about the car's capabilities, highlighting how enjoyable it is to drive. Additionally, @bringatrailer confirmed updates to the listing based on user feedback, which reflects a generally positive atmosphere around the car's presentation.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on the car's specifications, such as @Michael_Yount, who inquired about the meaning of RoW (Rest of World) models, and @mtx392, who asked whether the car had air conditioning. @gmehrguth (The Seller) confirmed that it is a non-AC car and addressed questions about the car's federalization and compliance with California's smog regulations, assuring potential buyers that it had passed inspection. Commenters like @Carmudgeon911 and @clementD also engaged with questions about spare parts, indicating a level of interest in the vehicle's details.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the car's modifications and history, with @djac70 questioning the absence of obligatory side signal lamps in comparison to his similar model, suggesting a lack of adherence to typical specifications. Similarly, @79_930_Registry expressed concerns about the vehicle's resprayed condition and potential hidden issues, asking for paint gauge readings. @gmehrguth (The Seller) responded to these concerns by denying knowledge about prior ownership modifications and reiterated his focus on the car's performance rather than its show quality, indicating some dissatisfaction with the scrutiny over its past.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express their admiration for the vehicle, particularly noting that the 2001 BMW 325Ci Convertible is an iconic model from the E46 series. @Dgroos2084 highlights this car as arguably the zenith of BMW, emphasizing that it is superior even to newer models. Enthusiastic remarks about the car’s aesthetics and condition come from fans like @Socaljam, who appreciates its original paint and pristine quality, fueling interest in potentially purchasing it. @Citabria98 echoes this sentiment with ownership of multiple E46 variants, asserting a strong preference for them over current BMW models.
Neutral: The seller, @1600veloce, provides detailed information about the listing, reflecting transparency by mentioning the vehicle's storage in a climate-controlled facility and availability for video walkarounds by appointment. This level of customer service is noted positively as it aids potential buyers in making informed decisions. The seller also addresses inquiries regarding the car’s paint and condition, affirming that it has no blends or touch-ups and that it’s a rare find in such condition. This engagement suggests a proactive approach to communication with potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment around the vehicle, there are some questions raised regarding its mileage history and overall use. @Wohlfman seems skeptical about how a car of this caliber has only logged 15,000 miles, comparing it to their own high-mileage BMW that remains in great shape. Additionally, @Socaljam's concerns about possible paint work on the vehicle suggests there might be some uncertainty about its history. Overall, while the vehicle receives much love, there are valid inquiries regarding its usage and condition that some potential buyers express.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Spider_Mike shares his fond memories of owning a similar truck, praising its reliability, good looks, and the perfect size that would satisfy any new owner. @SellySel appreciates the truck's excellent service history and mileage, reinforcing its well-maintained condition. @Jayule highlights the truck's rust-free body and expresses enthusiasm about its impressive miles and durable nature, suggesting that it’s a great investment for the future owner.
Neutral: In response to @Alorraine's inquiry about the bed size, @ANDERJ23 (The Seller) confirms that it measures 72 inches in length and 52 inches in width at the floor. @MarathonMan asks about specific features like a keypad for unlocking and certain items seen in photos, demonstrating an interest in the truck's overall features. The seller acknowledges these questions and provides clarifying answers, suggesting a transparent communication with potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments reflect a cautious perspective on the truck's condition. @Abel_Official1 questions the reason for the quick sale, hinting at a potential concern over its reliability. Additionally, @Abel_Official1 seeks confirmation about the paint job quality and possible imperfections, revealing an underlying skepticism regarding the truck's overall aesthetics. Despite these concerns, @ANDERJ23 (The Seller) reassures prospective buyers that the paint quality is good and that the vehicle is clean with minor blemishes.
![]() |
468-Powered, Pro Street-Style 1966 Chevrolet Chevelle Malibu Sport Coupe
136176A160251
Lot 202394
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as a "rambunctious red Rialto Chevelle Malibu" and praises the build quality, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @Barryward expresses astonishment with the car's pro street setup, also wishing the seller good luck. @HotRod73 admires the car's appearance and inquires about the certification of the cage as well as performance documentation, offering encouragement with a "GLWTA!". @WishfulThinker23 finds the build impressive and suggests that a soft launch video could enhance the listing's visibility. @Majuba commends the Chevelle's quality modifications, particularly highlighting its strong running 468 engine, while also wishing the seller good luck.
Neutral: @jsjodin asks for detailed statistics regarding the car's horsepower, torque, and quarter mile performance, expressing a desire for more technical information. @Jparsons68 seeks clarification on the engine details and inquires about the firewall trim plate, showing interest in the vehicle's specifications and completeness of documentation.
Negative: @martol (The Seller) clarifies that although they have invested time and money into maintaining and improving the car, they have never raced it or pushed it to its limits, only using it for car shows and casual drives. This indicates a cautious approach to the vehicle's usage, which might suggest limitations regarding its performance capabilities as indicated by other commenters' requests for stats.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Stropp commented on the visual appeal of both the vehicle and its driver, appreciating their beauty. Others, like @northwestnick, admired the patina and character of the Seven, pointing out that it has clearly been enjoyed. Additionally, @Mocktwo and @SmithTT noted that the driving experience looks fun and pure, highlighting the enjoyment that seems to come from driving this car.
Neutral: Comments from @BrightLight2Day (The Seller) addressed questions about driver heights, revealing the owner’s wife's experience as a driver and that various individuals of different heights had no issues operating the vehicle. @dfree and @Jags_in_the_barn discussed their mutual interest in the Rotus cars and shared thoughts on VIN numbers, while several commenters debated the vehicle's authenticity, with @bubblecar and @gusbat noting potential discrepancies that warrant further investigation.
Negative: Some commenters expressed skepticism about the car's authenticity, such as @gusbat, who pointed out that it seems more like a Caterham than a classic Lotus and raised concerns over its chassis and components. @northwestnick flagged potential issues with the chassis number and its history, while @grumpyoldman mentioned that the visual aspects resemble a modern Caterham rather than a 1964 Lotus. @bubblecar added that various parts of the vehicle bear signs of later modifications that diminish its original identity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Shomoil (The Seller) mentioned that the Land Cruiser features brand new Napa leather seats that cost around $2000, highlighting the quality of the interior. The full service recently performed on the vehicle included a drive belt, new filters, an oil change, timing belt, water pump, and tensioner pulley, suggesting that the vehicle is well-maintained. @Skyline12 remarked on the incredible appearance of the leather seats, confirming they are indeed genuine leather, which enhances the overall appeal of the vehicle.
Neutral: @FitzyPdx commented on the color of the Land Cruiser, stating it is undeniably 'thundercloud' which looks lovely in the sun, while @tdbryan expressed initial skepticism about the color but later admitted to being mistaken. @Shomoil (The Seller) assured @tdbryan that there was no need for apologies regarding his inquiry. Additionally, @Glovesandcars inquired about the presence of rear airbags in the 2004 model, to which @Shomoil (The Seller) responded that he would verify with a Toyota store.
Negative: There were some minor concerns raised, such as @tdbryan questioning the color representation of the vehicle, which led to some confusion. @Glovesandcars' inquiry about the rear airbags suggests some uncertainty regarding the safety features of the model. However, @Shomoil (The Seller) handled these queries with understanding and willingness to provide further information.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters praised the car's condition and aesthetics, emphasizing its beauty and well-maintained status. @phil10503 expressed excitement by saying, "NICE...glwta." @Green_Meanie referred to it as a beautiful example of the model, highlighting that it's made to be driven and enjoyed. @Slam105 pointed out that the vintage Alfa sounds like it will be a fun ride, and @buellwinkle mentioned that these cars are magical to drive, suggesting the new owner will be extremely happy.
Neutral: Comments also reflected on the car's history and specifications without leaning towards a negative or overly positive sentiment. @PMCan and @oldernslowernow reminisced about old Giulia vehicles from their past, contributing interesting anecdotes about their experiences with similar cars. @MotoG (The Seller) provided details about recent improvements made to the vehicle, including new tires and exhaust, while clarifying some car specs as well, indicating an understanding of the vehicle's features and needs for proper maintenance.
Negative: A few concerns were raised regarding the car's condition and authenticity. @palitoloco pointed out issues like the wrong grill and missing hood trim, while @Acobalt964 asked if previous videos were available to get a clearer picture of the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @kubist questioned why the seller was selling the car so soon after getting it, suggesting intrigue over the decision to part with a newly acquired vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Hshamamian described the vehicle as the best first bid ever, which conveys strong enthusiasm for the listing. @caffine praised the overall appearance and suggested that the bike looks good, noting that the shade matches nicely. @ppointer shared positive experiences with the SBS ceramic pads, emphasising their superior feel compared to OEM pads, suggesting a desirable upgrade for potential buyers. @Hovester (The Seller) provided a cold start video, indicating transparency and engagement with potential buyers.
Neutral: @Milo1984OK requested a cold start video, which is a common request from buyers wanting assurance about the vehicle's condition. @Sal996R inquired about the vehicle's VIN and its history, questioning the discrepancy of the US model being purchased in Italy, which indicates a need for further understanding of the bike's background. @Four_Leaf provided clarification about the purchasing process for vehicles bought by servicemen overseas, which adds context to the vehicle's origin without making a judgment on its value or desirability.
Negative: @caffine raised a concern regarding photo #23, suggesting that the fairing may have been resprayed, which could imply potential hidden issues. @Sal996R also expressed concern about the odometer being changed from km/h to mph and the implications for accuracy, which could detract from the vehicle's perceived value. Overall, these comments reflect a cautious approach to the purchase, highlighting the importance of thorough verification of details.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @wem5310 noted that the car looks well cared for, highlighting its good condition. @Ozventuregroup emphasized the charity aspect of the sale, including the added value of merchandise from Project Main St, which suggests a positive community impact and generous spirit involved in the auction. Additional comments from the seller about the car's memorable drive and the offer of a test drive indicate confidence in the vehicle's performance and condition.
Neutral: @Mrhoppy inquired about the functionality of the car's top and the struts, seeking clarification about any noises and the overall ride quality. @Ondeamo asked about the low mileage history of the car and whether it had been in storage, indicating a concern for the vehicle’s long-term maintenance. @bringatrailer mentioned an additional video in the gallery, which provides potential buyers with more insights into the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @gaspo2180 regarding the age of the tires, which are reportedly from 2010, prompting questions about their safety and reliability. @Ozventuregroup acknowledged a Carfax report showing an accident associated with the car, although the seller assured that no damage was visible, indicating potential discrepancies that could concern buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the 1956 Bentley S1 Continental Fastback, highlighting its stunning design and elegance. @Dollycat3 praises the classy color combination and gorgeous styling of the car, while @Mike_Breinin notes that it embodies both tradition and modernity, showcasing Bentley's commitment to quality. Commenters such as @KennyS and @RAllen8800 appreciate the car's duality, describing it as a refined luxury saloon at the front and a sporty car at the rear. @Hoppy18 finds it intriguing that the vehicle combines both a Continental and a Fastback in one model, emphasizing its unique appeal. Additionally, @Richard17 and @GBRBiLL label it as one of the most beautiful cars on the market, reflecting the admiration prevalent within the community.
Neutral: Several comments provide contextual insights about the vehicle's historical significance and driving experiences. @Dweck recalls a past journey in a Bentley, noting its comfort and handling, while @David_P describes a memory tied to a friend who owned a similar model. Commenters like @PrometheanHeat share technical details about differences between the S and R types and note the importance of well-maintained tires to ensure safety while driving a vintage Bentley. @MichaelsMotorCarsPA (The Seller) also highlights the car's authenticity, stating that it is a largely original vehicle that has been well cared for over the years, further attracting interest from potential buyers.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters mention concerns about potential modifications and mechanical issues. @Whizzard2 notes the car's automatic transmission may not always perform smoothly, referencing common issues associated with such systems. Additionally, @colinslovechild jokingly suggests an LS swap, hinting at a desire for modern powertrains. @PrometheanHeat emphasizes the durability of the car's engine but also points out the complications that can arise with automatic transmissions if not frequently maintained. Lastly, there are remarks like @skyancher's quip about the car being on the 'wrong side of the road,' reflecting a minor yet humorous critique associated with its British origins.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's performance and style, with @dewilhite1948 highlighting it as a great TTRS with a perfect color, stance, and sound. @jstuver described the car as 'gorgeous,' while @Sarki commended its clean presentation. The seller, @AutoBayNJ, shared insights about the vehicle's condition and features, stating it accelerates strongly and brakes effectively, enhancing its appeal as a collector's item. Several users expressed enthusiasm for the car's performance and modifications, noting the impressive aftermarket exhaust and stage 2 tune that lead to exciting driving experiences.
Neutral: A few comments focused on the vehicle's history and specifications. @BLT4SPD inquired about the extent of the damage reported, while @Grand-Cayman questioned whether the car includes auto rev-matching on downshifts. @Jmgrossm asked for verification of previous ownership details like smoking history and exhaust compliance. The seller responded with transparency about the minor damage, the presence of a Milltek exhaust, and the capability to revert the ECU to stock if requested, aiming to keep potential buyers informed about the car's condition.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle mainly revolved around the minor damage reported in its history. @BLT4SPD and @Doodooltallah expressed uncertainty regarding the extent of the damage and called for more details on repairs. Some commenters questioned the non-compliance with California's emissions regulations due to the aftermarket exhaust, bringing up potential headaches regarding smog checks. Additionally, @nbradford noticed an oil temperature reading issue, prompting further inquiry into the car's maintenance. These comments reflect a cautious approach from some buyers regarding the car's past and current conditions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is praised for its aesthetic appeal, with several commenters highlighting the attractive design, especially the black accents which complement the yellow paint. @Sherifftruman fondly reminisces about a previous model he owned, expressing his love for that car. @steamshovel and @NickW1 also appreciate its looks, with @NickW1 complimenting the overall design and the uniqueness of the 1st Gen Mini. Additionally, @YennaM fondly recalls memories associated with driving a similar model, signaling this vehicle's nostalgic value as a fun, high-end road legal go-kart.
Neutral: The discussion includes inquiries regarding the car's history, maintenance, and current condition. @mphjr raises concerns about discrepancies in mileage reported by Carfax, leading to an interaction where @iakllc (The Seller) responds, indicating ongoing efforts to rectify the issue. The seller clarifies that they do not possess service records as they have recently acquired the vehicle and assures potential buyers that the car is clean and has no rust. Some specifics about modifications and features are also discussed, such as the XM system's installation details, which indicates a level of thoughtfulness regarding aftermarket add-ons.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the vehicle's reported mileage discrepancies, with @mphjr questioning the reliability of the information from Carfax. @Bowling265 expresses skepticism about the high mileage claim, hinting at doubts about the seller's transparency before confirming revisions. Lastly, @NickW1 notes that although the vehicle has had regular oil changes, there are service needs on the supercharger that might require attention soon, suggesting potential maintenance issues for prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's condition and aesthetics, highlighting its beautiful clean look and low mileage. @roverlover06 referred to the 2013 Range Rover Sport as a "Beautiful L320," while @MoeBasil expressed admiration for the vehicle, stating that it was beautiful and mentioning his own positive experiences with two 2013 models. The seller, @BDAS, confirmed the car's excellent condition, noting it had lived its entire life in Florida, was accident-free, and had no flood history, which further reassured potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries regarding specific details were made, showcasing interest from potential buyers. @BenedettoM asked about the vehicle being a non-smoking car, which was confirmed positively by @BDAS, who mentioned it holds a pleasant Range Rover scent. @jimjim sought clarification on the spare wheel's originality and the presence of the owner's manual, both of which were confirmed by @BDAS, contributing to the transparency of the sale process. @Mongoose55 remarked on the vehicle's pricing, noting the low mileage might place it out of reach for them.
Negative: Concerns were raised about minor damages and vehicle history. @MoeBasil inquired about any notable damages beyond the driver's door panel, and @davidtodd1 asked for clarification on how the damage to the driver's door panel occurred, alluding to previous issues with UV damage in warm climates. However, @BDAS addressed these concerns by stating that the damage was due to UV exposure and assured that it was the only instance of such damage, offering to provide repair estimates to further address buyer apprehensions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, citing it as a fantastic starting point for anyone interested in a restoration project. @Walt7860 mentioned that it's a great representation of what is needed to get going on this type of build, while @funkaholik emphasized the benefits of having a media-blasted body without surprises. The seller, @94C4-Forever, shared that the car has potential with an appealing old school SBC and that the body is free of significant cancer, making it an attractive option for restoration enthusiasts. Overall, there is a sense of excitement about the possibilities this Camaro presents.
Neutral: Some comments were more inquiries than opinions, with potential buyers asking for details about the vehicle's condition. @UtahHashBrown inquired about the condition of the front fenders and hood, indicating a desire for more specifics about what needs to be done before painting. @crisd and @zy1125 also sought clarification on why the project was being abandoned and if the rotisserie could be sold with the vehicle. These neutral inquiries reflect a curiosity about the logistics and state of the car, showcasing the importance of transparency in the selling process.
Negative: A few comments hinted at concerns regarding the vehicle, suggesting that it may require more work than some buyers are prepared for. @Badger97 mentioned shipping costs as a potential deterrent after expressing nostalgia for the car, while @3Pedalonly made a light-hearted comparison to IKEA, implying that assembly might be complex. @funkaholik mentioned 'some assembly required', echoing an underlying concern that the restoration might come with unexpected challenges. Overall, while the car does have positive feedback, there are hints of caution regarding its restoration journey.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @andycarterphoto praised the car's interior, describing it as absolutely incredible and noting its unique appeal as a USDM commuter with added JDM quirkiness. @DVader expressed admiration for the car's fuel efficiency, saying it makes driving slow actually fun, while @JiminRichmond shared a positive experience with his previous 2001 manual Insight, which reached 142k miles before selling it due to passenger accessibility issues. Overall, the vehicle was recognized for its uniqueness, enjoyable driving experience, and overall charm as an economical car.
Neutral: @onlyhonda4me highlighted that the car is an interesting and rare JDM right-hand drive find, although it lacks a manual transmission, which some enthusiasts prefer. @3H0nda0rphans pointed out that the Aquamarine Blue color was not typically offered in the US market, making it a rare sight. Additionally, @mcwood provided technical insights into the vehicle's battery balancing system, explaining the role of the fans and their function within the IMA battery system, which adds a layer of technical understanding to potential buyers.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about the vehicle's features and accuracy of its listing. @MPETESS10 corrected @onlyhonda4me regarding the vehicle's mileage, stating that it actually has at least 78k miles, as the odometer reading is inaccurate. @56Markll questioned the existence of cruise control, implying that it was not a factory option. @RidleysRides, while expressing curiosity about hybrid E.M.F. readings, also hinted at potential safety concerns regarding long-term effects on passengers, raising a cautionary note about the vehicle's hybrid technology.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the positive aspects of the vehicle, including its low mileage and original ownership. @JGraham notes that the hardtop is a valuable addition, suggesting that someone will get a lot of car for a reasonable price. @jackiestewart (The Seller) also reassures potential buyers about the vehicle's maintenance history, stating that a thorough inspection was conducted and that the car passed its California smog check, which is good for another two years. @josehbraga05 mentions that significant maintenance items, such as suspension and speed sensor replacements, have been taken care of, indicating that the vehicle is up to date with repairs.
Neutral: There are several inquiries regarding the vehicle's service history and specific parts. @KarmannClassic requests clarification on the accidents the vehicle has been involved in and whether all recommended services were completed. @markindallas expresses concern about the spare tire holder and its functionality, highlighting the importance of a spare tire based on a past experience. @gwarcuri's request for clarification on ownership history opens a dialogue about the seller's personal circumstances, lending a deeper emotional context to the sale.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about specific issues with the vehicle. @markindallas is particularly focused on the condition of the engine and hoses, indicating apprehension about potential check engine lights. @jpsantinr points out that the lights knob seems to be missing, questioning whether this is a simple replaceable issue or if it indicates a larger problem. Additionally, @gwarcuri notes a discrepancy in the ownership history reported by CARFAX, which raises further questions about the car's background.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed strong admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and significance in American automotive history. @1969HurstOlds called it a showcase of 'Oldsmobility', while @krosa2112 referred to the car as a beauty made of American steel. @Craven appreciated its preservation by the original owner and shared that it evoked warm memories, celebrating the connection many have with such classic cars. @Button emphasized that it represents a piece of American culture and @sludgo shared how the car brought joy to a family member, showing its emotional impact. The @The_Dude_Abides, the seller, underscored his passion for the car, revealing its low mileage and significant history. Overall, the comments reflect a nostalgic reverence for the Oldsmobile 98 and its storied past.
Neutral: Several commenters provided interesting insights regarding the vehicle's condition and collectability. @63impalaboy mentioned the rarity of top-line cars being preserved in such conditions, questioning who would opt to keep an Oldsmobile as a museum piece. @binderguy52 expressed curiosity about the car's details, while @GlenK recognized that some attention might be needed to restore the car to its former glory. However, they also acknowledged that the car remains operational and is a remarkable find, with @63impalaboy reinforcing that it was well cared for by its previous owner. The seller shared that the vehicle's provenance and paperwork contribute to its value, indicating a broader appreciation for classic cars and their histories among the commenters.
Negative: Some comments voiced concerns about the vehicle's state, with @GlenK mentioning potential issues such as rust and deterioration in rubber seals after years of sitting. @GlenK suggested that these factors could could affect the car's integrity in inclement weather, expressing a desire for proper maintenance. The dialogue also included back-and-forth critiques, with @63impalaboy challenging @GlenK's observations about the car's condition, asserting that while it may not be perfect, it's still an exceptional opportunity for buyers. Overall, while the comments reflect admiration, there is a clear acknowledgment of the need for upkeep and potential repairs, signaling cautious optimism about owning a classic vehicle like the Oldsmobile 98.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @stan appreciates the truck's honest appearance, noting that it wouldn't be intimidating for regular use or maintenance. This sentiment indicates that the vehicle is accessible and user-friendly for potential buyers who may want to work on it themselves.
Neutral: @Jeff70 inquires about the original California plates, indicating a curiosity about the truck's history and authenticity, while @Loud_Robert (The Seller) provides detailed information confirming the plates' existence and condition. @6Shooters asks for specific information about rust repairs and specifics regarding the vehicle's condition, suggesting that they are interested but seeking clarity on maintenance aspects.
Negative: @6Shooters expresses concern about the rust on the passenger side rocker and mentions that it appears to have been a farm work truck, which raises potential doubts about its overall condition. They also comment on the wheel configurations and drum brakes, hinting at frustration over the limited visibility of details from the provided pictures, which can further detract from the vehicle's desirability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @gdspc praised the vehicle's color combination, noting its similarity to their own NC2 in Stormy Blue over Dune. @Bridgewater_Acura (The Seller) emphasized the Mazda MX5 Miata's wide appeal, mentioning that they frequently sell these cars and have enthusiastically listed it with plenty of details, indicating a strong confidence in the vehicle's quality.
Neutral: @BalaN inquired whether the car is an NB2 and questioned the transmission type, while @freestylenet offered clarification about the availability of the 6-speed manual option. Various commenters, including @JohnMGB and @bhudson, requested further information and specific photos related to the car's condition, showing interest in detailed aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: @likestodrive raised concerns about potential corrosion and sought advice on addressing it. @PullG pointed out that the car might lack ABS, which could be a downside for some buyers. However, @Bridgewater_Acura (The Seller) addressed the corrosion as normal for the region, advising that it does not impact the overall structure of the car significantly, suggesting simply enjoying the vehicle without excessive concern.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @PaulDavid described the car as handsome, while @MyCarsResume praised its beautiful color, noting how it accentuates the lines of the car and mentioning it as a masterpiece. @HealeyRick joyfully mentioned the fun of driving the vehicle with 42.5 hp, and @Fly_TWA expressed admiration for the car's color, comparing it to a big Healey, and highlighting the enjoyable driving experience in the eastern US during late summer and autumn. Additionally, @Emeyertheflyer, who reportedly saw the car in person, encouraged bidders to have confidence in the seller and their representation of the vehicle.
Neutral: The seller clarified some points about the car's title in response to inquiries, stating it is titled as a 1961 but verified as a 1960 by the Heritage Certificate. This led to comments from @60Bugeye and @NC_TRACKRAT questioning the title inconsistencies and features like the gas gauge's functionality. @GBRBiLL and @Fly_TWA discussed the commonality of registration discrepancies in vintage vehicles, asserting that it was a standard practice in the past. The seller reported that the car is in excellent condition, with no rust repairs and confirmed that it is numbers matching.
Negative: Concerns were raised about potential inconsistencies with the vehicle's title, with @60Bugeye questioning the different state registrations and model years presented. @NC_TRACKRAT pointed out that while the gas gauge works, it requires tapping, and inquired about the state of the tires and missing components like the convertible top. Some commenters expressed their wariness regarding the car's history, hinting at legal and ethical ambiguities from its past, as @MyCarsResume noted that odd things happened with car registrations in previous decades.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 exclaimed the vehicle is a 'beauty', highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @HeavyTank77 mentioned that Bentaygas have been around for nearly a decade but believes this model might become one of the more affordable options available, suggesting a favorable view on its value.
Neutral: @MichaelCal pointed out that the vehicle had an accident in November 2018 but reassured that the Carfax report shows no accidents, indicating a lack of clarity regarding the vehicle's accident history. @15marsick raised a question about the reason for significant oil accumulation in the intercooler tubes, suggesting there may be technical concerns that need addressing.
Negative: There are concerns about the vehicle's reliability, particularly due to its past accident. The inquiry from @15marsick regarding the oil accumulation suggests potential mechanical issues that could affect performance and maintenance, indicating that prospective buyers might need to be cautious.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praises the vehicle as an absolutely gorgeous and rare Chevrolet Impala two-door sport coupe, showing enthusiasm for its aesthetic appeal. Similarly, @skychief9 is impressed by the beauty of the Impala, requesting restoration photos to appreciate it further. @Rpharesjr expresses admiration for the car's cleanliness and beauty, indicating that it should do well on the market, while @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as an absolutely fabulous build. @Highlander63 highlights the uniqueness of the 59/60 Impalas and appreciates the specific details of this car, noting its condition and color combination as excellently done.
Neutral: @KennyWHill (The Seller) mentions that the restoration pictures were lost due to a phone malfunction, yet he has managed to find a couple of images during the restoration process. He also confirms that there will be a reserve set for the auction and that he has both the original rims and replacement hubcaps, promising to add pictures of them. @Philly66 inquires whether the auction will be a no-reserve format, indicating curiosity about the auction's structure, while @G.M.-TECH asks for more information about the original rims and hubcaps, suggesting that details are still sought about the vehicle.
Negative: @Noisyboyz finds the car absolutely gorgeous but is skeptical about its rarity, citing the production number of 72,765 1959 Impala Sport Coupes that were made. This comment prompts a response from @Rpharesjr countering that while many were produced, fewer remain in pristine condition like this one. Overall, there aren’t many negative comments, but skepticism regarding rarity is noted in @Noisyboyz's comment, reflecting some contrasting opinions among enthusiasts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning color, which @jsloden described as the best color ever made for this model. @MiatasAndBeamers fondly recalls the identical spec from their childhood, making the vehicle emotionally appealing for potential buyers with families. Commenters like @pclongo7 and @supercustomdeluxe reinforce this positive sentiment by calling it a beauty and referencing the appealing name "Riptide Blue" for the color. Overall, the vehicle generates enthusiasm among viewers, suggesting a strong interest in its aesthetic and nostalgic value.
Neutral: The seller, @ELTIJ, is engaged with the audience by providing updates and responding to specific inquiries about the vehicle's condition and features. They indicate their intention to upload various videos showcasing the vehicle starting, driving, and its exterior and interior details, which keeps the conversation flowing and maintains engagement. Additionally, information about the vehicle, including its model, specs, and delivery details, is shared, offering prospective buyers relevant information for their decision-making.
Negative: Conversely, a few comments reflect uncertainty about aspects of the vehicle, such as @Jcraigz asking if the tires are original, which hints at buyers' concerns regarding authenticity or potential wear. Another commenter, @Beight, mentions a strong bid from @babyD69, implying that competition might be stiff, and there is an awareness of potential high pricing. @89lincolntc notes the shift in the market, lamenting that the days of finding this vehicle at a bargain are gone, indicating a sense of challenge for prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ACCauctions describes the vehicle as an "elegant classic," highlighting its classic appeal. @Dollycat3 agrees, calling it "absolutely beautiful" and complimenting its "lovely color combination." @Sunbeamdon shares a sentimental story associated with similar vehicles, expressing nostalgia for the 1964 T-Bird and suggesting that it would be a great toy for the next owner. @performanceautogallery, the seller, also notes that the car presents nicely with a good running condition and provides options for improvement, which could enhance the overall experience for future buyers.
Neutral: @performanceautogallery mentions several details about the car's current condition and history, emphasizing that it has undergone repairs and maintenance under the last owner's care. They encourage potential buyers to review the gallery and associated videos for a comprehensive look at the vehicle, including its starting and driving capabilities. The seller also notes the no-reserve auction nature, indicating the bidding process is uncomplicated and straightforward for those interested.
Negative: @Danlockemy inquires whether the selectAire unit still blows cold air, to which @performanceautogallery responds that it does blow cool air, although expectations should be managed as it is not a modern A/C system. While no overtly negative comments are made, the mention of the car requiring a couple of pumps to start reflects a characteristic that some might view as a drawback. Furthermore, the seller acknowledges that improvements could be made, implying that while the car is well-loved, it still has room for enhancement.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @indianmotorworks (The Seller) received positive feedback regarding the vehicle's presentation and the engaging videos being shared, particularly with the promise of more updates such as a cold start video. @Basil017 commented positively on the aesthetic aspects of the bike, noting how the Harley Davidson front end fits the overall vibe, while wishing good luck in the sales. @ketch347 also praised the descriptions and presentations, highlighting the effectiveness of the videos in conveying the vehicle's attributes.
Neutral: @broodie and @Mouse51 engaged with @indianmotorworks (The Seller) about technical details and personal preferences regarding the motorcycle setup. @Mouse51 remarked on the absence of a left-hand mirror compared to the installed right mirror, to which @indianmotorworks (The Seller) explained it was a personal preference, while also clarifying potential confusion about the engine's serial number. The comments reflect an interest in the technical details of the bike's configuration but don't express strong sentiments either way.
Negative: Critics like @ketch347 mentioned feeling that the motorcycle had too many Harley Davidson parts, showing a concern about the authenticity of the Indian brand in the build. Furthermore, @broodie raised questions about the need to retard the spark for starting, implying a doubt regarding the vehicle's starting procedures. @Mouse51 also implied that the overall look of the bike might mislead average observers concerning its performance, suggesting that the integrations might overshadow the true capabilities.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments regarding the vehicle highlight its stunning appearance, particularly its color, which several commentors appreciate. @JFrankP describes the vehicle as a 'stunner', while @RAllen8800 notes his favorite color for vintage Jaguars, British Racing Green, and admits the car looks absolutely stunning in Écurie Écosse blue. @FantasyJunction (The Seller) emphasizes the vehicle's impressive presence in person, enhancing its photographic appeal. Additionally, @Sdtravelin appreciates the homage the car's color pays to the Écurie Écosse racing team's notable victories.
Neutral: There are informative exchanges about the vehicle's historical context and features. @Spider_Mike provides trivia about the California 'Black Plate', which @jetdriver2 inquires about. @FantasyJunction (The Seller) responds with clarifications about the ownership history and vintage vehicle authenticity in California. Several comments address mechanical components and potential modifications, with questions about wire wheels and body colors—@Mmayerla, for instance, raises concerns about tire age and outstanding repairs, while @Sdtravelin shares insights on the vehicle's features based on personal experience with similar models.
Negative: Some concerns emerge regarding the vehicle's components, with @Mmayerla questioning the status of previously noted worn parts and asking about the replacement engine. There is also uncertainty about the authenticity of the wire wheels, as @Sdtravelin points out potential discrepancies with the body color and engine specifications. Moreover, @jetdriver2's question about the Year Of Manufacture (YOM) program indicates confusion surrounding the vehicle's registration process, suggesting it may not be fully transparent regarding its history and modifications. Overall, these discussions reflect a mix of admiration and scrutiny among potential bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the overall appeal and condition of the vehicle, with @Vinlsol calling it a beauty and praising the Apexi N1 Dual exhaust for its sound. Also, @wishful notes the strong interest in the car and mentions it looks well sorted and maintained. @sfarkhan appreciates that the car has not been overly modified or damaged, appreciating its preservation state. Additionally, @Gr8scott admires its great body and tasteful modifications, reinforcing the car’s desirability.
Neutral: @crimsonpride, the seller, provides detailed insights about their ownership experience, mentioning that the car has always been garaged and is rust-free. They have made a few upgrades focused on cooling to maintain reliability, although they maintain it hasn't been raced or tracked. The seller addresses inquiries and concerns about various functionalities and parts of the car, including the AC, vacuum lines, and exhaust system. They also share information about routine maintenance they have performed, including AC charging and parts replacements.
Negative: There are some concerns raised regarding the vehicle's components, such as @torresmiguelpr noting potential inconsistencies with the speed gauge and leaks, leading @JMB240 to speculate about the functionality of the power sunroof. The seller mentions irregularities with the speedometer that have been described by others as symptomatic of common issues in similar vehicles. Additionally, concerns were raised about the compression numbers potentially being low for the car's mileage, suggesting possible underlying issues that could need addressing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the rarity and quality of the vehicle, highlighting its manual transmission and overall condition. @bhoffma1 mentioned that it's rare to find a manual Cherokee in good shape, while @stan emphasized that this is a favorite vehicle, encouraging others to buy it before someone else does. The seller, @Drewhayes6, also appreciated the vehicle's preservation and expressed enthusiasm for finding an enthusiast who will appreciate this classic Jeep.
Neutral: Comments from users such as @Hami888 and @newcarpro provide additional context about the vehicle's features and specifications. @Hami888 inquired about the air conditioning and its potential repaint history, indicating some interest in the details. Meanwhile, @newcarpro shared vehicle specifications, listing standard and optional equipment, which demonstrates the Jeep's unique features and capabilities.
Negative: On the downside, several commenters noted the lack of air conditioning, which seemed to be a concern. @Edvert pointed out the absence of A/C, and @orw1 even suggested that an aftermarket AC installation could be feasible. @rkjjeep humorously commented on the lack of A/C by suggesting to recruit a passenger for cooling purposes. Additionally, @Jive requested more video content to assess the vehicle's condition, reflecting the hesitation some potential buyers may feel without seeing the car in action.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ankurgt expresses nostalgia for the Mercedes-Benz 380SL, recalling a classmate who drove a white R107 SL, illustrating how impactful such memories can be on one's preferences. @VBAutosport (The Seller) showcases enthusiasm for presenting the 1984 model, describing it as a timeless example of German engineering. The positive comments emphasize the car's elegance, iconic V8 engine, and its suitability for weekend cruising or car meets, generating excitement within the bidding community.
Neutral: @VBAutosport (The Seller) actively engages with potential buyers by addressing their questions and providing updates about new videos and service records. They offer clarifications on features such as the availability of a factory hardtop and a smoke-free interior. The seller demonstrates a willingness to share more media content and keep the community informed about the car's condition, including updates about dashboard cracks noted by @19willys46.
Negative: While most comments are positive, concerns emerge regarding the interior condition, with @19willys46 pointing out visible cracks on the dashboard, which may detract from its overall appeal. Additionally, @taipan49 inquires about the hardtop and smoke-free status, indicating potential caution among bidders regarding the vehicle's full condition. These negative aspects may influence buyers' perceptions and ultimately affect their bidding decisions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle's impressive specifications, including features like ceramics and air suspension. @jolsongoude highlights the excellent spec of the Macan, while @terrynoah2004 (The Seller) confirms that the specifications are indeed remarkable in person. @skl48, a previous owner, notes that the vehicle's spec is close to perfect, emphasizing its desirable features. Additionally, comments like that from @lovebread point out that the Macan Turbo is a gem due to its superior options compared to a typical Macan GTS, making it an attractive choice for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several questions from potential buyers reflect a need for more information about the vehicle. @jillybean10 inquires about the possibility of aftermarket options like a trailer hitch, while @MCTECH and @AircooledOne request details about the suspension and service records. @jdf1271 and @Countryboy1 ask about the car's condition, service history, and whether specific issues have been addressed, showing that there are standard concerns regarding maintenance and vehicle integrity. @fowler queries about the differences between this model and GTS, highlighting the interest in understanding the variations between trims.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns regarding certain features that may be lacking or the vehicle's upkeep. @Mopdahl expresses disappointment that the Macan lacks Adaptive Cruise Control, a crucial feature for them. Similarly, @dief123 questions why the seller is parting with the vehicle after minimal use, suggesting a potential lack of commitment to long-term ownership. @AircooledOne's inquiry about service intervals reflects concern regarding the vehicle's maintenance, while @Countryboy1's questions on potential issues with the transfer case and timing chain cover bolts raise red flags about reliability, despite @terrynoah2004's reassurance about the Macan's maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @headude describes the vehicle's color combination as beautiful, while @bencardonne praises the DB9 for its elegance, class, and power. @GDogg also appreciates the slate blue over beige, considering it fantastic. Additional commendations come from @DJagXJ12 who shares a notable observation about a specific inspector's preference for blue DB9s, emphasizing a personal connection to the color. The seller, @ckcollectibles, is proactive, promising to provide additional information and mechanical checks while expressing confidence in the vehicle's appeal and quality. Overall, many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic and design.
Neutral: Several commenters raise questions regarding the vehicle's service history and ownership changes, indicating curiosity about its past. @spmcevoy inquires about service records beyond the Carfax, and @mgalland seeks clarification on the high number of owners relative to the mileage. @valladares.jonathan wonders about the scarcity of manual transmission examples. The seller, @ckcollectibles, responds to these inquiries, suggesting that the ownership history may include flips and comparing it to possible reporting inconsistencies in Carfax. This section includes informative exchanges where car enthusiasts consider the complexity of ownership trends and documentation in the luxury vehicle market.
Negative: @Aspenracer shares a more critical viewpoint on British cars, notably expressing concerns over reliability issues historically associated with the brand, suggesting that such issues may overshadow the positive attributes of the DB9. He cautions prospective buyers about potential uncertainties regarding maintenance history. @HemiEddie426 addresses these concerns, countering that maintenance in high-end vehicles is costly across the board, but he acknowledges that buying at the right time can make a significant difference. Furthermore, @CFC69 prompts an inquiry about troubling noises in a driving video, while @K.Kons and @DJagXJ12 debate the necessity of replacing 21-year-old tires, highlighting potential issues with maintenance understanding.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @swb911s praised the Mercedes SL as one of the finest products of its line, highlighting its elegance and ease of access for older individuals. The seller, @BenjieInKC, has provided good documentation and has shown recent care for the vehicle. The overall condition of the SL was described as remarkable, suggesting that it has been well maintained and is an attractive option for prospective buyers.
Neutral: @swb911s expressed curiosity about the functionality of the car's CD changer, prompting @BenjieInKC to indicate that he hasn't tested it during his ownership and would check it. The seller also shared a video showcasing the exterior of the car and a quick demonstration of the convertible top working perfectly, addressing potential buyer inquiries on its mechanical features.
Negative: @Seth202 raised concerns about the condition of the tires and their date codes, indicating a need for clarification on these components before proceeding with a potential purchase. Although no other negative comments were made, the inquiry points to a common concern that potential buyers often have regarding older vehicles and their maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ProfGriff and @GBRBiLL both praised the rare, low-mileage condition of the vehicle, highlighting how difficult it is to find a clean Disco in this state. @DennisKing also echoed this sentiment, mentioning the solid build of the Rover, while @Sirmgreco found the interior to be impressive for its age, emphasizing its spectacular condition. The seller, @FreemanMotorCo, appreciated the feedback regarding the tire appearance and assured potential buyers that they would present the vehicle in pristine condition when sold.
Neutral: @Amm1341 raised concerns about the sagging interior ceiling lining, indicating a potential sunroof leak, but noted that the roof was sealed. The seller responded, clarifying that while the sagging lining suggested past leakage, there was no body rust, indicating effective sealing. @Amm1341 further inquired about the SRS light, to which the seller explained that it might be related to a common wheel sensor issue. This engagement demonstrates a willingness to clarify any ongoing issues with potential buyers.
Negative: Overall, while there are some critiques, particularly regarding the tires needing cleaning and the sagging headliner hinting at previous sunroof issues, the general consensus appears favorable. @GBRBiLL suggested improvements for the tires, and @Amm1341's questions about potential rust and the SRS light reflect common concerns buyers typically have. While @Sirmgreco mentioned the exterior needing some of its own TLC, it seems the positives outweigh the negatives, leading to an optimistic outlook for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 expressed excitement about the opportunity the vehicle presents for talented individuals. @Abebreslin1 shared a personal connection to the 190SL model, reminiscing about their father's ownership and expressing hope for the car's restoration. Additionally, @carstruck and @Ross1896 discussed the potential benefits of a restomod, highlighting the appeal of modern performance upgrades while retaining the classic aesthetics of the vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @FDF1, confirmed that the engine turns freely and provided insights about the car's restoration prospects, stating it could range from $50k to $150k depending on various factors. They also clarified that although the drivers side may require floor work, the overall car is considered fixable, and they have experience with such projects. @P.kluz inquired about underbody photos and a detailed list of spares, while multiple users engaged in a conversation about restoration versus purchasing a restored vehicle, highlighting the differing opinions among potential buyers on the best route to take.
Negative: Concerns were voiced by @Mikejanco, who indicated that the investment required to restore the vehicle may not result in a wise financial decision given the current market for the 190SL, suggesting that restoration might lean more towards passion than sense. Others, like @Tomer, questioned why someone would invest in such a project over purchasing a fully restored version or a daily driver. There were also hints of apprehension regarding the overall state of the vehicle, with questions about rust and the extent of repairs needed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ABaron praises the vehicle as an "ABSOLUTELY UNBELIEVABLE SURVIVOR," highlighting its rarity and quality compared to contemporary models like the Ford Model A. They commend several original features, including the intact side window sticker and ash tray, emphasizing the vehicle's exceptional condition. @ClassicMX5 also appreciates the Chevy Independence for its authenticity and rarity, recalling a personal experience riding in the rumbleseat, indicating that the winner of the auction will enjoy the car immensely.
Neutral: @mcbulb (The Seller) responds to @ABaron, explaining that the wiring harness was replaced due to its condition but assures buyers that everything electrical works except for the dome light. The seller plans to add several videos showcasing the car and its condition. Additionally, @mcbulb confirms the inclusion of 1931 Maine license plates with the sale, addressing @KnoxTime's inquiry about the vehicle's plates, and mentions the car's participation in the upcoming 4th of July parade.
Negative: @The_Art_Doctor raises concerns about the brakes, suggesting they might not be functioning well during a video. However, @mcbulb reassures them that the brakes are fine, clarifying that their comment about not stopping was aimed at their spouse filming. This contrary feedback indicates potential issues that might concern some buyers, although it's eventually downplayed by the seller.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Singerirv expresses hope that the vehicle will find a good home for restoration, indicating a positive view of the car's potential. @scottybmdmup describes the car as a beauty regardless of its current condition, showing an appreciation for its aesthetic appeal. Overall, there is a sense of admiration toward the classic E-type, with many commenters believing that old cars like it hold enduring value.
Neutral: @wespar33 (The Seller) provides several explanations regarding the vehicle's auction history and current status, clarifying the auction winner's inability to complete the transaction. @Jkernxx1 raises questions about the windshield wipers and potential alterations to the vehicle, indicating curiosity and engagement with the car's specifications. The discussion about the engine and title reflects an ongoing search for information, emphasizing that the vehicle is a work in progress.
Negative: @Bumpy expresses skepticism about the auction process, questioning the credibility of the buyer's story and suggesting the need for more transparency. @DesertDex and @eb227314 both caution against moving the engine without proper preparation, indicating a concern for potential damage. @Maxsells raises doubts about the vehicle's usability, questioning the rationale behind purchasing new tires without getting the engine to start, alongside concerns about the title and registration issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @bg891822 (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a great looking ride, indicating its attractive appearance. @Ruel, an Osprey Defender owner, praises Osprey's build quality as exceptional, comparing it positively to other high-end custom vehicles. He shares his positive personal experience with Osprey, highlighting the truck's solid construction and reliability, stating he would confidently drive it cross-country without issues.
Neutral: @hoffman12pete expresses curiosity about the vehicle's history, specifically why it hasn't been driven despite its dream build status. @DASL_18 inquires about the type of title the vehicle has, suggesting some interest in clarifying its registration status. @EO98993 expresses interest as a potential buyer, raising questions about registration and emissions testing, reflecting a level of caution regarding the purchase process.
Negative: @WAGONBOYTD points out the difficulty of registering kit cars like this in major cities, which potential buyers should be aware of if emissions testing is required. @EO98993 mentions concerns about surface rust on certain components given the car's low mileage, questioning the maintenance and condition. @EO98993 additionally notes that due to the low miles, the vehicle may need extra sorting, indicating potential reliability issues for future owners.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @SNATCHOLOPHIGUS praised the car's immaculate condition, expressing a desire to see it in person due to its appealing presentation in photos. He specifically noted the absence of any dash cracks, deterioration in the armrest, or rust beneath the vehicle, and also mentioned the rare additional TCS switch as a positive feature. @IdahoTruckAndRV (The Seller) confirmed that the car is indeed as pristine as depicted.
Neutral: @2002WS6 and @98WS6 both inquired about the original rims of the vehicle, which @IdahoTruckAndRV (The Seller) indicated were not available, as the previous owner had disposed of them. @MidCitiesMildMan provided detailed specifications about the vehicle's features, such as the engine type, interior trim, and mechanical components, contributing valuable information for potential buyers. @thebuick further asked about any door panel cracks, to which @IdahoTruckAndRV (The Seller) replied that the car was in the same condition as received, and maintained well.
Negative: @Caffeinated25 remarked on the previous attempts to repair the door panel cracks and raised concerns about the roof panel's condition behind the T-tops, which is known for factory glue-related issues. This comment reflects a cautious approach to the vehicle's condition, as he shared a past experience with a similar model. @awezoom provided a link for a replacement license plate insert but did not directly critique the car, indicating a minor concern over aesthetic details.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 1965 Mustang has received numerous compliments for its eye-catching features and overall condition. @xxranch praised the updated A/C unit, noting its effectiveness during Tucson summers, while @1gizmo described it as a great looking car encouraging continued questions about its interior. @poshin82 was impressed by the rebuild, calling it 'sexy' and expressing a wistful desire to bid should circumstances allow. Many commenters, including @CarFoolLane and @Lancer13, highlighted the attractive color of the car, specifically remarking on the Rangoon Red finish, hinting at the car's appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments discussed technical aspects and details surrounding the vehicle's features, including the A/C and instrument cluster. @Paul65k and @xxranch engaged in a dialogue about the provenance of the A/C unit, clarifying its originality and modifications. The @bbcarguys (The Seller) provided comprehensive answers about the car's specifications, confirming information about the deluxe pony interior and the nature of the 5-dial instrument cluster included in the auction listing, emphasizing the need for clarity on details for proper buyer knowledge. Questions regarding the vehicle's title and condition were also present, indicating some uncertainty but overall informative dialogue.
Negative: On the downside, a few concerns were raised regarding certain aspects of the vehicle. @Cars3D suggested that the build date contradicts the specified interior options, leading to speculation about the authenticity of some details. @jclanin inquired about possible modifications to the rear end, signaling a search for clarity about the car's exact specifications. Lastly, @1gizmo pointed out a troubling noise heard during the drive video, asking for clarification on potential engine noises and overall ride quality, suggesting that while the car is aesthetically pleasing, questions about performance remain.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @KevalB describes the vehicle as an underrated gem, while @funkisfunky calls it beautiful. @GrigioF430 notes its originality and their surprise in learning that the 912 model had Thermal Reactors from Porsche in 1976. @AndrewC finds it gorgeous, especially highlighting the rare sports seats. @gh356 appreciates the car's condition and comments on the potential impact of the Leno Law in California, expressing excitement for the next owner. @groceg vouches for the car's quality, emphasizing the current owner's caution in maintaining its pristine condition. @915fan mentions the distinctive sound of the engine and admires the happy yellow color fitting the 912E well. @Caymanorcarrera also comments on the car's original features and good cosmetics, while @smb127 praises the engineering behind the engine's performance during challenging times.
Neutral: There are mixed thoughts on the smog test challenges for this car. @RustyTruck argues that smogging it isn't difficult with the right adjustments to the air/fuel mixture. However, @Jerodhelt shares their struggles with getting their 912E to pass smog in California, detailing the extensive efforts required. @Carlover1939, a long-time owner, states that their car passes smog easily, thanks to proper maintenance and fuel management. @KG1965 comments on the car's stance, suggesting it may be slightly lowered, while @RustyTruck provides clarification on ride heights relating to American and European models, mentioning the adjustable suspension system.
Negative: Concerns about passing smog regulations in California dominate some comments. @Jerodhelt highlights the difficulties of smog testing, mentioning that restoring the car to a specific condition is essential for passing, which adds frustration for some owners. There’s also skepticism from some users about the modifications, as @In2details inquires about the car's repaint history and paint depth readings, demonstrating a cautious approach to its condition. @WCube questions the stock nature of the rear speakers and the muffler, hinting at potential modifications that could affect the car's authenticity. Additionally, @Gingerman points out some performance figures that could be improved with engine modifications, illustrating a desire for performance enhancements that some may find off-putting.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @e9er finds the bike visually appealing and would consider purchasing it based solely on its looks, calling it a cool bike. @TheObsidianCollection highlights the bike's rarity, noting there are only 50 available in the US and Canada, which adds to its impressive factor. @Sidvettboy1 expresses admiration for the bike, emphasizing its badass character and showing a long-standing desire to own a Ducati.
Neutral: @keithfitz is interested in more details about the bike, including its service history, break-in process, additional parts, and whether all keys are available, indicating a level of engagement with the specifics without a clear positive or negative stance. @dennisd9 raises a question about the availability of BaT shipping for the bike, which suggests a concern about logistics but not about the bike itself.
Negative: @HeavyTank77 comments that the bike is not their style, though they acknowledge it as a crazy two-wheeler, implying that while it may be well-made, it does not appeal to their personal taste.
![]() |
| |
Positive: @manofstealth complimented the vehicle's unique color combination, praising it as a departure from the typical silver and black. @Elitephysiques also expressed a positive sentiment regarding the color, marking it as an attractive choice. Several commenters appreciated the effort made by the seller, @PrivateCollectionMotors, in presenting the car and encouraging inspections before the auction ends.
Neutral: @Cmarion52 speculated on the possible reasons the soft top is inoperable, offering insights into simple fixes for the issue. @PrivateCollectionMotors confirmed that they have conducted inspections and can assist with shipping options. Other users posed questions about specific features of the car, like the driver's seat and dashboard condition, indicating curiosity without clear judgment. @HDRangr suggested checking the coolant light issue and the condition of related components, while @slplanner noted noises in the video that raised questions about the vehicle's state.
Negative: @norm26 questioned the inability to retract the soft top, implying it could deter potential buyers due to its importance for a convertible. @Aeneas137 voiced concerns about multiple problems with the car, describing disturbing undercarriage photos and a possible clutch noise, while expressing doubt in their ability to address the issues. Additionally, @kingtut pointed out that the turn signal fails to cancel automatically, and @altax76 raised a valid concern regarding an illuminated passenger airbag light, signaling potential safety issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @aaronsvendsen describes the vehicle as a "Great Hank Moody spec 964," suggesting it has a high-quality standard or unique appeal. @Scott_S calls it a "Nice time capsule!" expressing optimism about its potential value, while @BurningDinos points out its desirability with, "Soooo nice." @boaboyoz admires the car's aesthetic, noting it as "totally fab" in its black and beige color scheme and wishing the seller good luck with the sale. Additionally, @saa106 mentions owning a similar vehicle and praises its rarity, confirming that it is both "rare and beautiful."
Neutral: @Goldstein (The Seller) has provided informative updates regarding the car, adding paint meter readings to the gallery, uploading a cold start video, and committing to include a video walk-around. The Seller also notes that they will add portrait photos, indicating an ongoing effort to provide more content for potential buyers. In response to inquiries, @Goldstein (The Seller) confirms the A/C functions well, addressing @BrakeLate_'s request for A/C readings while also providing an assurance about the heating system's performance. @Kdawg7 has requested a driving video, highlighting an interest in seeing the vehicle in action.
Negative: Some comments express a desire for more information and additional content about the car. @BrakeLate_ requests specific performance data such as AC readings and compression leak down results, indicating a level of concern regarding potential unknown issues. Similarly, @Kdawg7's request for a driving video suggests that while the car seems appealing, potential buyers are seeking further confirmation of its operational state. Lastly, @Chino2016’s inquiry about the opportunity to see the car indicates a need for more hands-on interaction before considering a purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's striking appearance and sound. @Mordizzle highlighted the truck's vibrant yellow color with enthusiasm, calling it a 'SCREEMIN' YELLOW HAULER', while @JDarby commented on its 'Stunning Color' and 'Great Sound'. The seller also affectionately described the vehicle as a 'nice rumbler', indicating that it performs well and is appealing to potential buyers.
Neutral: Some inquiries focused on the technical aspects and condition of the vehicle. @39mercman and @KawaZmoto asked about specific mechanical features, like the wiper system and the truck's rear-end functioning. The seller addressed these questions directly, confirming that the wipers are still vacuum-operated and that the rear-end works as intended. Additional comments about the paint condition raised concerns, but the seller clarifies that the imperfections are minor paint chips rather than rust issues.
Negative: There were a few criticisms regarding the vehicle's condition and design choices. @UncleBaldy questioned the decision to paint the truck in a non-traditional color if the intention was to build a 'stocker', suggesting it may alienate traditionalists without attracting a new audience. @overthehill noted the absence of shock absorbers on the rear axle, implying that this could lead to discomfort while driving. Furthermore, @KawaZmoto expressed concerns about apparent imperfections in the paintwork, implying that it may not have been adequately prepared before application.
![]() |
Spectral British Racing Green 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Autobiography LWB
SALGV3EF0GA290722
Lot 202417
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: @lionsfan54 praised the vehicle's specifications, calling it the best possible spec. @afmuro72 referred to the vehicle as a beaut, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @cjw24 found the truck stunning and noted it would have been a nice addition to their own collection if they were in the market. The color combination was also positively highlighted by @WAGONBOYTD, who emphasized how well it should perform given its specifications with the V8 engine.
Neutral: The seller, @genevamotorcars, provided clarifications and additional information in response to comments. For instance, @sergeant80 queried about a similar vehicle that had sold recently, to which @genevamotorcars explained that it was different due to specifications and mileage and provided a road test video. When asked by @landRover1460 for a window sticker, @genevamotorcars supplied that information while noting it may not be completely accurate. They also committed to providing paint meter readings and responses about the vehicle's history regarding paint refinishing.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @hbl21 regarding the replacement of control arms, to which @genevamotorcars explained it was common for heavy vehicles at that mileage. @VRMoose requested more detailed photos, particularly with paint meter readings and specific areas of the vehicle, indicating a desire for thorough transparency. Additionally, @waymilky referred to potential recall issues concerning the front suspension of the model year but was reassured by @genevamotorcars that this vehicle did not have any active recalls, clarifying its eligibility for sale.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Taz66 commented on the aesthetic appeal of the wheels, noting they enhance the Z3's stance and presence significantly compared to the standard M wheels. @Mgh20180 reminisced about his fondness for the car, likening it to a modern version of his beloved MGB roadster, emphasizing that it’s the car he would have loved to own during high school, especially appreciating the choice of wheels. Overall, there is a strong appreciation for the car's design and modifications, indicating it captures a nostalgic and attractive essence for many.
Neutral: @Blakbart inquired about specific modifications on the vehicle, such as the aftermarket shifter knob and the shotgun shell covering the headlamp switch. @Cullier joined the conversation, referencing the uniqueness of the modifications and expressing interest in the car's overall setup, indicating intrigue about its customization, particularly with the RF subframe. Also, @E36M34ME confirmed the reliability of the S52 engine, which has been a point of discussion among car enthusiasts, and pointed out that the cooling system issues have been addressed in this vehicle.
Negative: @BasuraBlanco expressed concern about seating comfort, questioning whether he, at 6'1" and 350lbs, would fit in the driver's seat, suggesting that there might be some limitations in space for larger individuals. Additionally, @foxberryjam humorously asked for pictures of the trunk, which may imply some mystery or potential disappointment about its condition given the follow-up commentary. While the majority of comments are positive or neutral, these questions hint at possible drawbacks for certain prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the 1985 Jaguar XJ-S as a beautiful low mileage vehicle, with @Dollycat3 expressing admiration for its aesthetics, referring to it as a classic with 'old school cool.' @AKSOLDIT (The Seller) assures potential buyers that the car is in 'AMAZING MINT condition' with no visible flaws, emphasizing the professional repaint it received from the previous owner. Enthusiasm is echoed by @Kohall who also appreciates the car's classic appeal, while @AKSOLDIT outlines their commitment to ensuring the car finds a good home, reiterating the promise made to the previous owner.
Neutral: There are informative exchanges among bidders about the import processes and potential costs associated with bringing the car back to the United States, with @Gregpryckman bringing attention to a 2.5% old duty that applies. @AKSOLDIT confirms this and provides assurance about the car's compliance with regulations for its age, including any safety needs for Canadian bidders. Additionally, @AKSOLDIT mentions their recent ownership of just three weeks, leading to questions about the vehicle's air conditioning system and other minor mechanical inquiries, such as the tachometer's functionality in various videos.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition arise regarding the air conditioning unit, which @red1985 and @Gregpryckman mention after @AKSOLDIT reveals it does not blow cold air despite attempts at recharging. There's a shared understanding about the 'as is' nature of the sale, expressing some disappointment that more could be done regarding the A/C issue and the driver's seat bolster, which @Gregpryckman notes could be addressed at a cost. This leads to a discussion about the added expenses for potential repairs, suggesting that while the car has a lot of positives, there are significant areas that may require attention.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle being auctioned by @LongiMotorsports has received positive remarks for its extensive features, including massage seats and heated and cooled cup holders. It is praised for its great design which still looks cutting-edge even after ten years. @MPM97turbo commended the robustness of the 2015 model, noting that it is a solid choice for potential buyers, which contributes to the overall favorable impression of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @NWong and @7ACM7, asked questions regarding the vehicle’s functionality and specifics. Concerns were raised about the rear entertainment system functionality depending on the availability of remotes, and inquiries about specific components like the ECO button, inspection reports, and trunk configuration were made. @LongiMotorsports provided answers and offered assistance with shipping, indicating an eagerness to facilitate the sale.
Negative: There were some negative mentions related to the vehicle's air conditioning system. @MPM97turbo highlighted a known issue with the AC condenser line that can corrode and lead to expensive repairs. @NWong expressed concerns about the AC's performance, questioning whether it might be due to clogged filters or low refrigerant. Furthermore, @Ksmooth sought clarification about the AC’s condition, implying that there may be underlying issues that need addressing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @unamused stating it was perfect and @Island_cruiser calling it AMAZING, gifting it well-wishes for the auction. @Hackberry remarked on its striking looks, while @deeman001 agreed it looked great and wished the seller luck. @BlueRidge2 described the vehicle as 'True Eye Candy', noting how the 27-year-old refurbishment still looks fresh. Multiple users, including @OldNavyCTI, praised the meticulous restoration, labeling it a work of art that looks better than new. @Icontoys highlighted its impressive mileage history, asserting it is one of the nicest trucks potentially seen at the auction. Overall, the comments uniformly celebrated the aesthetic and quality of the vehicle.
Neutral: Commenters noted specific details of the vehicle, with @bjd918 inquiring whether the top had been off during current ownership, to which @longjarred100 (The Seller) responded that it had not. @mattexplore raised a concern about the age of the tires and asked about any other maintenance required, to which @longjarred100 indicated that while the tire date codes were from 2015, there was no dry rot and the vehicle had been serviced recently. Additionally, @HeyEli questioned the model year discrepancy related to the manufacturing date, with @longjarred100 clarifying that it was originally manufactured in October 1981 but listed as a 1982 model.
Negative: Some comments included minor criticism, particularly from @mattexplore who noted that the tires were old and would need to be replaced, although no other significant issues were reported. The queries regarding the vehicle's model year saw some confusion highlighted by @HeyEli, alongside @MrBrodinski's observation that there was inconsistency in the production date info. However, these points were addressed by @longjarred100 (The Seller), who clarified that a misstatement had occurred regarding the manufacture date and its registration. Overall, the concerns expressed did not detract much from the overwhelmingly positive perception of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @jrgehrman (The Seller) presents this vehicle as a well-maintained 2004 M1097 A2 Humvee with numerous upgrades and repairs demonstrating careful attention to detail. The seller's extensive background as a former ASE certified master technician and experience with General Motors adds credibility to the maintenance narrative. Key improvements include replacement of glow plugs for easy starting, new LED lights, and a well-done upholstery job on the front seats, which enhance both functionality and appearance. The Humvee has been thoroughly inspected and serviced, showing noticeable performance with no major issues except for a minor oil leak that the seller describes as negligible. Overall, the vehicle is implied to be a reliable and impressive classic.
Neutral: The seller has a comprehensive understanding of the Humvee's components and has performed a variety of necessary fixes, including servicing the portal axles and changing the fluid. The vehicle is described as retaining original military features while also being adapted for civilian use with added rear seat bases and a license plate bracket. The vehicle's characteristics, such as the smooth running 6.5 non-turbo engine and the presence of run flats, are highlighted, giving potential buyers a clear image of its operational status. The seller notes that the Humvee has heat but no air conditioning, which may be a consideration for buyers in warmer climates.
Negative: Despite the overall positive description, there are a few drawbacks mentioned about the vehicle. @jrgehrman (The Seller) acknowledges a minor oil leak from the oil pan and power steering pump, describing it as a common issue for vehicles of this type and stating that it is not significant. Furthermore, the date code on the new tires is outdated, posing potential concerns for buyers regarding safety and regulation compliance. Lastly, the lack of rear seats is mentioned, although the buyer can customize the seating arrangement as desired. These factors may affect potential buyers' interest or their bidding decisions.
![]() |
3,100-Mile British Racing Green 2018 Porsche 911 GT3 Touring 6-Speed
WP0AC2A94JS176169
Lot 202517
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle reflect a majority positive sentiment, praising its stunning aesthetics and overall build. @Chalk992911S called the car 'gorgeous,' and @toroivy emphasized it as 'the perfect spec!' Enthusiasts like @Tripledigit and @boaboyoz highlighted the car's incredible presentation, with @Frostytacos noting its high potential resale value. Many users are captivated not just by the car's exterior but also by the luxurious interior, with @FuelAddict appreciating its simplicity and functionality. The vehicle has captured the imaginations of car lovers, with many declaring it a dream spec and expressing their desire to own something so exquisite. Overall, this vehicle is viewed as a high-value, highly desirable addition to any collection.
Neutral: Amid the praise, there are neutral comments that address various practical aspects of the vehicle. @beandip83 raised concerns about potential cosmetic issues, questioning a specific part of the car's condition. Additionally, @Fastbuy and @eb166 inquired about the DME report and maintenance history, indicating an interest in the car's operational status rather than its aesthetic appeal. @jchmidland also provided historical context about the car's specifications, showcasing the community's strong knowledge base and interest in the intricacies of the model. This mix of enthusiasm and pragmatic inquiries suggests that while the car is highly regarded, potential buyers are also vigilant about its condition and service history, showcasing a balanced perspective among the commenters.
Negative: There are some negative undercurrents in the comments, with a few users expressing disappointment about the car's interior color palette. @TimBuckToo_2 criticized the choice of a plain black interior as not complementing the beautiful exterior color. @rhd555 noted a lack of effort in the interior design, suggesting that more could have been done to elevate its luxury feel. The concerns voiced by @beandip83 about apparent damage and the desire for more detailed photos indicate a cautious approach among some prospective buyers, hinting that despite the car's overall attractiveness, it does not come without potential issues that need clarification before a purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Aeronut (The Seller) begins by expressing excitement about the sale of the vehicle, describing it as a 'Butternut beauty' that was restored well and ready for a new owner. @RazorbackRed and @Dukerunr also appreciate the car's appearance, with RazorbackRed noting a similarity to their own vehicle and highlighting its aesthetics. @Pettyfan43 praises the Butternut color and the black vinyl top, calling it perfection, while @ssterry shares newfound admiration for the Butternut Yellow, stating that this Camaro changed their perspective. Many comments indicate an overall appreciation for the design elements and craftsmanship of the car.
Neutral: Commenters like @KentGBR express some reservations about certain features, such as the addition of a black vinyl top to a non-vinyl top car, but note the car's beauty overall. @Dukerunr acknowledges that while the emblem isn't strictly correct, it's an easy fix. @kellvette raises a question about the gear ratio, indicating an interest in specifics but not suggesting any issues with the vehicle itself. Additionally, @Banksonit709 inquires about the style code and specs, demonstrating some technical curiosity without negative sentiment.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the oil pressure gauge, with @ouch advising on checks for accuracy and expressing a desire for higher oil pressure readings before bidding. @Banksonit709 points out that items like the front badge aren't necessarily accurate, which leads to a discussion on details that might affect the car's classification or appeal. Overall, while the comments include minor criticisms or suggestions for improvement, they do not diminish the car's desirability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mzeran89z describes the 1980 Jeep CJ-5 as having been meticulously upgraded since its purchase, with a focus on improving performance and drivability. The installation of a low mileage 4.8L LS engine has significantly enhanced the Jeep’s power, allowing it to cruise comfortably on the interstate at higher speeds. They highlight the thorough inspection and replacement of critical components like the oil pump, timing chain, and lifters, which contribute to the vehicle's reliability and performance. Overall, the seller emphasizes the Jeep's solid condition with no significant rust or damage, making it a strong candidate for any buyer looking for a fun, reliable vehicle.
Neutral: The seller mentions that the Jeep originally came with a rear seat, which has been removed but can easily be reinstalled with just a few bolts. Additionally, while the listing does not specify, the Jeep comes equipped with a bikini top and soft doors, enhancing its versatility for different driving conditions. The seller encourages potential buyers to ask questions, aiming for transparency and confidence in the sale.
Negative: There is a note of past mechanical issues with the original engine, including a substantial lifter tick that prompted the seller to opt for an LS engine installation. Although this upgrade has resulted in significant improvements, it does highlight the Jeep's previous challenges. Furthermore, while the seller claims the frame and floors are solid, there are minor signs of corrosion on the driver’s side front fender, albeit not worsening since they purchased it.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received high praise for its stunning appearance and impressive specifications. Commenters such as @siegelng and @campodf express their admiration, noting the unique Umber Metallic color and the overall aesthetics of the GTS model. @V8inMK2 referred to it as the best-looking GTS seen in a long time, highlighting its sustained appeal even after 15 years. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, showcases the car's immaculate condition and comprehensive service history, adding to its desirability. The low mileage and comprehensive features, including the panoramic roof and premium audio system, further enhance its appeal.
Neutral: There were mixed comments regarding specific details about the vehicle. @JakePM inquired about the reported minor damage, while @rjcp1 asked for feedback on the comfort of the sport seats. The seller responded that the minor damage was likely related to a dent removal that did not involve any paintwork, assuring potential buyers of the car's great condition. There were also questions about details like whether the car is equipped with both keys that work and the existence of remote start, indicating a desire for clarity and assurance among potential bidders.
Negative: Some skepticism emerged regarding the vehicle's reported history and certain mechanical concerns. @richinwhb and @MB54 expressed doubt about the previous owner's statement regarding damage, suggesting that an insurance company may not have mistakenly recorded a claim. These comments revealed a sense of caution among potential buyers about the car's past, especially concerning the transfer case issue known in some Cayenne models. However, the seller reassured buyers by offering transparency and the option for a pre-purchase inspection (PPI), indicating confidence in the vehicle's condition despite some reservations from the bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @shipe (The Seller) describes the Mustang as an "extremely nice car to take to cruise ins" that runs and drives great with no issues and no rust. The car has always been garaged, and the seller emphasizes its well-maintained condition by mentioning it comes with a car cover and bag. @MichaelB330 also comments positively, noting that it looks like an honest, straightforward driver. @BigBadgerBrown, who inspected the car, affirms that it is "extremely clean and well kept," having no rust, dents, or scratches, and confirms that everything on the Mustang works well.
Neutral: @shipe (The Seller) clarifies details regarding the car's original data plate and its color history, indicating that the previous owner lost it during a repaint. The seller also addresses questions about the car's features, confirming it has power steering and drum brakes. Additionally, the seller acknowledges the presence of some minor cosmetic issues, such as a chip that appeared after a recent repair, and expresses intention to have it fixed professionally. The seller has also promised additional photos and videos in the coming days, indicating a proactive approach to communicating with potential buyers.
Negative: Despite its overall positive condition, there are some concerns raised by @shipe (The Seller) regarding a recent issue with the power steering that required immediate repair. The sudden loss of power steering and the appearance of a chip after the service have been troubling for the seller, who expressed disappointment and stated that they are seeking a resolution for this issue. @1329Guy also points out the unfortunate circumstance surrounding the chip, empathizing with the seller's situation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Kurte551 commented positively about the vehicle, stating that he has an exact model and finds it a pleasure to drive, whether for cruising or doing burnouts. He appreciates the car's handling, comparing it to a go-kart, which reflects its fun and sporty nature. @Shesgonnakillme noted a specific feature of this vehicle, the aluminum heads that were introduced in the later production models of 1986, indicating a desirable component that enthusiasts might appreciate.
Neutral: @Lodilake (The Seller) provided information about the car's condition and usage, mentioning that it has been garage-stored since its purchase in 1986 and only driven a few miles every six months for the last 15 years. He confirmed that the power seat buttons, radio, and speakers function properly, though he pointed out that the radio antenna does not operate automatically anymore and must be raised manually. @Trying1 inquired about the air conditioning, to which @Lodilake responded that it does not blow cold air as it hasn't been used in many years.
Negative: @Trying1 expressed concern about the air conditioning functionality, implying it could be a drawback. @Turboba6 asked whether all power seat buttons, radio, and speakers were working, which may suggest some apprehension regarding the electrical components and overall functionality of the vehicle. Such questions hint at potential issues buyers might be cautious about, indicating that while the vehicle has positive attributes, there are areas that could raise doubts.
![]() |
29-Mile 2023 Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing 120th Anniversary Edition 6-Speed
1G6DY5R60P0961970
Lot 202445
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the vehicle being auctioned. @GDogg described it as a 'sensational find,' while @DraganMitic simply stated it is 'VERY VERY NICE' and wished the seller good luck with the sale. @AZSkye highlighted its potential as a future collector's item, praising its outstanding features including delivery miles and a significant price tag. @KatieKlean emphasized that the CT5-V Blackwing is one of the greatest sedans ever made, reflecting a strong positive sentiment towards the car's overall quality and design. Additionally, the unique specifications and rarity of the limited edition have generated interest and appreciation among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Comments revealed some questions and inquiries about the vehicle's specifics. @Gigi2020 pointed out an inconsistency in the vehicle’s title history, asking about its service history and mileage prep, while @red69500 sought information about the window sticker and original documents. @SRT2008 inquired about the availability of the certificate of authenticity and prior driving school access, noting that they might no longer be valid. The seller, @collectiveauto, responded to several inquiries, confirming the presence of the window sticker and offering to check on the certificate of authenticity. The dialogue indicates an ongoing effort to clarify details about the car without explicit negativity.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns or expressed skepticism about aspects of the vehicle's sale and history. @CWSPhoenix joked about possible overcharging, implying that the seller may be eager to get the car off their hands. @newcarpro highlighted that the vehicle was reported sold in early 2023, which introduced uncertainty about its current status, echoing @Gigi2020's worries over the car's title history. @SRT2008's comment about the color being unattractive to them also provided a negative perspective, indicating that while the car has many fans, it may not appeal to everyone. Overall, a few commenters voiced caution and disappointment regarding specific details related to the sale rather than the vehicle's overall appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Mopardrvr (The Seller) describes the Triumph Thruxton as a gorgeous motorcycle, highlighting its excellent condition with only 668 original miles. Commenters like @bobrk and @motoFiend praise the bike's beauty and express their fond memories of owning similar models, showcasing the appreciation for the Thruxton’s classic style and character. Additionally, @trailerjoe shares a positive experience of enjoying his own Thruxton, noting its ease of riding and comfort, reinforcing the bike's reputation as a fun and enjoyable ride.
Neutral: @Mopardrvr (The Seller) provides detailed responses to inquiries, clarifying that all fluids have been checked and that the bike requires no dealer service. He also mentions that it has always run on non-ethanol gas and kept on a trickle charger, addressing concerns about its maintenance and upkeep. Some commenters, like @LaneFM, ask questions about the bike's service history and original sales sheet, indicating active interest but leaving their impressions neutral pending specific details.
Negative: @LaneFM mentions finding corrosion on the wheels, raising a concern that some may perceive as a drawback. @trailerjoe discusses typical aging issues with the bike, such as the bluing of the header pipes and potential chrome corrosion, which could deter some buyers. Overall, while the bike is presented as being in excellent condition, these minor concerns highlight common issues that prospective buyers should be aware of, as they could impact their purchasing decision.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ttocs6991 (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a beautiful pearl white 2004 Lexus LS430 with tan interior. They assert that all electronics work well, the vehicle runs smoothly, and the AC blows ice cold. The seller mentions that the timing belt was serviced in 2016 and offers additional maintenance options for the high bidder, reinforcing the vehicle's overall appeal. Other users, like @Gslide, remark on the car's cleanliness and acknowledge the quality and enjoyment of owning such a vehicle. @V8swappedIS300 also praises the aesthetics of the car, emphasizing its attractive color.
Neutral: @Wheelyneat clarifies that the trim code for the vehicle is Cashmere, not Ecru, and @soos_ramirez requests better photos of the undercarriage, indicating a desire for comprehensive visual information. @Kenn1926 asks for a cold start video and driving footage, showing a common interest in seeing the vehicle in operation. @ttocs6991 (The Seller) responds to these inquiries, indicating a willingness to provide additional information and videos to potential buyers. However, @Burmos_Racing raises a concern about the lack of service history on Carfax, prompting the seller to clarify that they will upload over 22 service records from their Lexus account shortly. The presence of multiple inquiries reflects common interests and concerns among potential buyers.
Negative: @shan318 highlights concerns regarding missing oil change documentation for a substantial mileage interval and mentions potential delayed maintenance on the vehicle. They point out that the car's owner declined scheduled transmission service and a necessary oil pan reseal, indicating possible neglect. @dawg17 adds that it appears recommended brake services were not completed, which @ttocs6991 (The Seller) attempts to address by stating the car stops responsively with deep brake pads and good rotors. However, Shan318's observations about maintenance practices suggest caution, as the seller's assurances do not fully resolve all doubts. This tension between the seller's optimism and prospective buyers' reservations creates a complex view of the vehicle's condition and history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the Audi Quattro, with many users expressing their appreciation for its beauty and exceptional performance. Commenters like @bennymartin enthusiastically affirm the car's provenance, while @GDogg calls it a 'Fantastic Mars Red Quattro!' Other enthusiasts like @no.radar describe it as a 'holy grail Audi Urq,' reinforcing the respect this vehicle has among car aficionados. The mention of its thrilling rally history and connection to legendary drivers, as shared by @MarkS and @Porschesmom, adds to the vehicle's allure, showcasing its storied heritage and emotional impact on fans. @notacarguyatall and @moonrunner1972 also commend its aesthetics and express hopes for a successful sale, indicating its desirability.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the VIN discrepancies regarding the Audi Quattro, suggesting this is a common issue that potential buyers should be aware of. Commenters like @masterqi and @urQed530 discuss differences in VINs that arose due to North American specific regulations, which have sparked inquiries among other users about the vehicle's authenticity. The user @RNLabas provides a detailed explanation of how VINs were standardized post-1980, illustrating the complexity surrounding this topic without expressing a strong opinion for or against the car themselves. The discussions between users further indicate a curiosity about the mechanics and regulations surrounding vintage vehicles, particularly for enthusiasts looking to acquire a classic Audi.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car's condition, specifically regarding the air conditioning system, which @Defender90NAS pointed out does not blow cold air. @Defender90NAS also expressed a desire for personal inspection, which highlights hesitance from potential buyers about purchasing a vintage vehicle without inspection of its current state. Additionally, the queries raised by commentators like @BasKoetenRacing and @masterqi about the chassis number and different VINs cast a shadow of doubt on the car's originality, which might deter some buyers who prioritize authenticity in classic cars. As a result, while many comments celebrate the car's legacy and appeal, there are clear concerns about its condition and historical documentation that should be addressed by the seller.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @JB1971SX expressed admiration for the vehicle's kitchen, stating it is nicer than his own home. @Dollycat3 referred to the Fleetwood as beautiful, highlighting its spaciousness and excellent condition. @LPJ1998 shared that he owns the same model and highly recommends it for its performance, emphasizing the power of the 8.3L engine. @DRAIDEZ1 used an enthusiastic emoji to describe the vehicle. @SeniorsonaMission highlighted their commitment to maintaining the mobile unit for senior safety, emphasizing that it has been pampered and well cared for.
Neutral: @SeniorsonaMission confirmed that Seniors decals were replaced last year and provided specifics about the installation quality. They addressed inquiries about the tires, stating that while they aren't in excellent condition, they are not terrible, and mentioned that all three A/C units work effectively. Additionally, @scarey69 mentioned the potential complication of logo removal, indicating a service concern while also expressing empathy for the seller's mission, which provides technology training for seniors.
Negative: @Sobie01 and @cdoggyd raised concerns about the vehicle needing new tires and ongoing maintenance costs, questioning whether bidders should be worried about potential expenses. @cdoggyd mentioned significant repair costs over the past few years, thus hinting at possible future financial implications for prospective buyers. Furthermore, @jim_rosenthal sought clarification about the engine's mounting position, suggesting some uncertainty about the vehicle's overall condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the unique nature of this vehicle, as it is assembled in Colombia using original Fiat parts under licensing agreements. @z3velocity found it cool that the vehicle is a combination of two brands, appreciating its viability for conversion projects. @acarrizosa explained how it underwent a full restoration process, ensuring authenticity and high quality, making it an outstanding representation of Fiat’s legacy, while @tonyvidal remarked on it being a great beach cruiser that garners attention similar to luxury vehicles. @Fiatplus recognized the car's restoration efforts and showed interest in its quality despite some questions about the specific restoration terminology used.
Neutral: Some commenters express curiosity about the vehicle's specifications, especially regarding its performance capabilities. @Woseknows inquired about its top speed, to which @acarrizosa provided information indicating it can reach around 60 mph while comfortably cruising at lower speeds. Others, like @Fiatplus and @tonyvidal, discussed the distinctions between the Fiat 600 and its sibling the Fiat 500, with comparisons made on driveability and use cases. @acarrizosa shared insights on the performance advantages of the 600, such as a more refined suspension and improved engine output. Additionally, the seller clarified the vehicle's rarity compared to the Fiat 500, noting fewer units produced and available.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the description of the restoration process by @Fiatplus, who questioned how a unibody vehicle underwent a 'frame-off' restoration, prompting clarification from @acarrizosa regarding the terminology used. @acarrizosa admitted to the potential for misunderstanding but reinforced the thoroughness of the disassembly and rebuilding process. Furthermore, skepticism lingered around the terms 'new' and 'rebuilt' in vehicle restoration, with @tonyvidal looking for assurance that the car could be a reliable daily driver and not just a weekend leisure vehicle. There was a slight tone of doubt about achieving factory-quoted performance speeds, indicating uncertainty about the practical capabilities of the car post-restoration.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @rmp5s expresses excitement about the vehicle, noting how it is an amazing piece of history as @Jeepmike mentions that it is car number 0178 of the 1993 model year, one of the first 500 Vipers ever built. @Viper1 highlights that this specific model is referred to as an antenna car, which can be a plus for collectors. @daveviperman praises the car, asserting that it has a bulletproof engine and is an incredible deal, as it was the only handmade car since the Model T.
Neutral: @260TJ1967 seeks clarification on the vehicle's modifications and whether the antenna is included, and also asks about the head gaskets. @soarinsiren (The Seller) confirms that the car is stock, the antenna is included, and the head gaskets are original, while also noting that the tires were replaced during long-term storage. @newcarpro provides a detailed vehicle description, listing its features and specifications, which adds useful context for potential buyers.
Negative: @Vipervas94 expresses disappointment about the front license plate ruining the aesthetic of the Gen I Viper. @kkneen2 also shares concerns that the tires likely need replacing and that the head gaskets are still original, indicating potential issues for buyers looking for a well-maintained car. Furthermore, @260TJ1967 mentions visible scrapes under the nose from use, which he believes could be an issue for those wanting a pristine vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters praise the VW Fox as a stunning example of a vehicle, with @iloveoldcars7 calling it "very very nice" and @Kurt_T expressing excitement to see its selling price. Enthusiasts like @NVGT350 marvel at its low mileage, noting only 30 miles have been put on it since it was last sold. Comments highlight its black on black coupe style and the anticipation for the auction results, with mentions of the car being a time capsule and pristine under its previous ownership by @p1_motorcars_ltd.
Neutral: Many users are curious about the vehicle's features and history, with @idrivemine seeking clarification on the presence of a rear defroster and others speculating about its past sales. @DKeng notes the importance of the rear axle options, while some commenters share nostalgic memories of owning similar models. Overall, there is a shared respect for the car's design and rarity, with @BrianGTO commenting on the scarcity of original low-mileage 5.0 Mustangs.
Negative: Some comments express disappointment over certain features missing from the car, such as a sport interior, as noted by @Agillespie777. @coppertopped points out a potential oversight regarding the rear defroster box, suggesting it may have been ordered incorrectly. Additionally, @Z282SLO and @ParnelliK66 engage in a back-and-forth debate about the performance claims of 5.0 Mustangs versus Grand Nationals, with disagreements on nostalgia versus reality.
![]() |
Ex–Danny Gans, Eleanor-Style 1967 Ford Mustang Fastback 5-Speed
7R02A142788
Lot 202437
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has been well-received, with multiple commenters expressing their admiration. For instance, @INDPNDT called it a dream car, and @grb1 highlighted it as a stunning Mustang, stating that it handles exceptionally well. @KARPARK shared an extensive overview of the specifications of the car, which has generated excitement among potential buyers. The attention given to detail, including its impressive performance features like a 351 V8 engine and a five-speed manual transmission, resonates well with the audience, making it appealing to both enthusiasts and collectors.
Neutral: Several users engaged in discussions around the vehicle's features and history, with @KARPARK providing context about its origins as an Eleanor build from the film 'Gone in 60 Seconds.' Comments also touched on technical aspects, such as the type of engine—specifically clarifying that it is a Windsor motor—and the car's modifications. The vehicle's backstory was a point of interest, with commenters like @ChitownOG seeking more information about Danny Gans, the original owner, indicating a mix of curiosity and respect for the car's lineage.
Negative: On the downside, some comments pointed to potential confusion regarding the vehicle's specifications, particularly concerning its engine type. @sdrcp expressed disappointment about the car being equipped with a 351 V8 instead of a larger engine option, reflecting a common misconception. Additionally, @Autodynamics flagged a non-constructive comment regarding the car's condition and historical representation. @KARPARK responded to this by emphasizing transparency about the vehicle's build, addressing imperfections but reaffirming the car’s overall quality, indicating that not all feedback was entirely positive.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Pilgram1 (The Seller) provides assurance about the vehicle's condition, stating that the handlebars were replaced in 2020 with new OEM parts and confirms that the bike has never been down while in the current owner's possession. This information may provide potential buyers with added confidence in the vehicle's upkeep and reliability.
Neutral: @XRDV8 inquires about the possibility of adding a cold start or running video, indicating interest in seeing the vehicle in action. This comment highlights a common practice among buyers who want to assess the vehicle's performance before making a purchase decision.
Negative: @928Rick996 expresses a concern regarding the handlebars, suggesting they appear bent. This comment may raise doubts for potential buyers about the vehicle's overall condition, even though it is countered by the seller's assurance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the great condition of the GL550, with @HKMotors (The Seller) describing it as nicely optioned, in amazing shape, and functioning perfectly. @Dollycat3 called the vehicle beautiful, reflecting a positive sentiment about its appearance. Overall, there seems to be an appreciation for the vehicle from various commentors, including @rrv912, who expresses enjoyment for this body style.
Neutral: Several commenters ask for additional information about the vehicle, such as @alexvorderman requesting more photos of the door panels and @Benkrown asking for a cold start and driving video. @NWong inquires about the number of keys and entertainment accessories available for the rear entertainment system, while @smackalino wants to clarify the vehicle's location, which @HKMotors confirms is in Oregon. These inquiries indicate that potential buyers are assessing the vehicle further rather than expressing strong opinions either way.
Negative: There are concerns raised about specific maintenance aspects, with @NBC79 inquiring about the timing chain check valve, a common issue that could lead to a noisy startup. @HKMotors responds by stating that there is no record of the part being replaced, although the vehicle does not exhibit the associated rattling. The absence of a second key, as mentioned by @NWong, might also be seen as a downside for potential buyers who value complete sets of accessories.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @cwpost praised the car's steel flares and stance, noting it is better than most '77 turbos and calling it beautiful. @RidleysRides reminisced about the joy of owning a grey-market Carrera from Berlin, stating this car is far more beautiful and well sorted than his old one. @TheDrivenGarage described it as gorgeous, while @GatorDMD highlighted its beauty overall. @CarFanatic333 commented that it’s a cool car to drive and enjoy, and @jcvass found it a great opportunity for those looking for a 'cool hot rod'.
Neutral: Several commenters, like @jaydubau and @Emmar911, debated the car's true identity as it doesn't appear to be a Carrera 3.0 but a modified 911S with a 3.0 SC motor. @911r (The Seller) clarified the car's classification, acknowledging the initial miscommunication regarding its listing. Questions about the engine's history and emissions compliance were raised by @clementD and @mkrailfan, but there was a general agreement on the car's appeal notwithstanding some uncertainties about its specifications.
Negative: On the flip side, @carrera30reg and @Mezgerfan pointed out that the car is not a Carrera 3.0 and questioned its authenticity, suggesting it might just be a 911S with modifications. @JDMLifestyleClassic noticed paint blemishes and asked about potential rust issues, which @911r confirmed while asserting there was no visible rust. Some comments expressed concerns over the tires being functional but looking out of place, which @spudlyone remarked on, and @mkrailfan criticized the lack of clarity on emissions compliance, expressing worry about potential legal issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @CamdentonMO describes the vehicle as beautiful and has high hopes for its sale, while @Super-Dave agrees that it is a great-looking Camaro and wishes the seller good luck with the auction. @AZSkye expresses admiration for the Z28 and believes the decision to keep the original radio as a non-working unit is wise, emphasizing the importance of maintaining classic elements in the car. @LOdug praises the seller's transparency and trustworthiness, showcasing confidence in the auction process. @Banksonit709 appreciates the original red color, highlighting its attractiveness and uniqueness as a factory option.
Neutral: @DET1957 (The Seller) provides detailed information about the car's condition and history, confirming that it has never had rust or been involved in any accidents. The seller mentions past ownership of multiple 1973 Camaros, reinforcing a deep connection and care for these vehicles. Questions regarding the engine's originality and mechanical upgrades are raised, with the seller promising to provide additional photos and answers regarding the car's characteristics, including whether specific components like the original air cleaner assembly and gear ratios are intact.
Negative: @My3sons_nh inquires about the period the car has been off the road, indicating potential concerns about long-term storage. @Coog54 requests clarification about the electrical components working properly, specifically mentioning the radio issue, which has caused some scrutiny. @nrgizr expresses skepticism about whether the right air cleaner assembly is present, indicating potential concerns regarding authenticity. Additionally, @Banksonit709 points out uneven gaps on the vehicle's panels, suggesting that they might reflect underlying issues with its bodywork and workmanship.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle's aesthetics and overall quality, with @Chuck_Coltman calling it "Beautiful" and @Pherman declaring it an "Absolute beauty." @whipcity76 expressed admiration for its rarity, noting it's the first red CLK they've seen, exclaiming, "Yowza!" The seller, @WestsideCCS, highlighted that the car is an honest example with an impressive mileage of under 7,000, enhancing its appeal. Others, like @Tommy_gunz and @Rollinn, echoed similar sentiments about its lovely condition and unique color, stating, "Beautiful example of a loved CLK Black!! Great color as well."
Neutral: Several comments provided contextual details about the vehicle, including service history and color accuracy. @whipcity76 asked for clarification regarding the color designation, initially stating it appeared as Mars Red but was later confirmed by @WestsideCCS to be indeed Mars Red. There's a discussion about the car's ownership history where @tallingmatt inquired about what 'repossessed' meant, which was clarified by @WestsideCCS as related to the owner's business of title loans. The response by @otoupalik noted concerns about the low mileage possibly impacting the usability and reliability of the engine, leading to a broader discussion about maintenance recommendations.
Negative: A few commenters expressed skepticism about the condition or fate of the car. @otoupalik warned that the vehicle's low mileage might be indicative of neglect, emphasizing that cars like this should be driven to maintain them properly, and @Floria questioned if the low mileage since 2008 affects the engine's usability. @blacklisted made a somber remark suggesting the previous owner's need for a loan was a "sad story." Concerns were also highlighted by @Formel1 who indicated that the recent service may have overlooked critical maintenance like the brake fluid flush, further suggesting that a car sitting idle might face reliability issues.
![]() |
19k-Mile 1979 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 10th Anniversary Edition WS6
2X87K9L144320
Lot 202453
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @unkleernie called the car an "awesome ride" and expressed his enthusiasm. @BettertoBurnout shared fond memories of owning a T/A, noting the car looks original and unmolested, highlighting features such as a functioning clock and low mileage. @MaxPower66 thought the car was cool and a time capsule, expressing interest in bidding on it and showing excitement about potentially adding it to his collection.
Neutral: Multiple users, including @Dvredc5 and @Wxflyer, inquired about the car's storage history and any issues related to its paint and interior damage. @Rustycrankshaft (The Seller) provided detailed explanations about the car's storage conditions, paint issues, and interior damage, assuring potential buyers that the vehicle is in good condition apart from the concerns raised. Comments also focused on the car's features, such as the functional air conditioning system, while others asked for further clarifications regarding the car's history.
Negative: @Whatsupwidat criticized the early water-based paint jobs from the Van Nuys assembly plant, expressing distrust in the car's paint quality. @e9er questioned if the paint and fading damage reflected the car's low mileage, suggesting that the deterioration might not solely stem from storage. @19seventy3vette doubted that the paint wore down from a cotton car cover alone and speculated there might have been leaning against the fender during repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @kustomcarguy (The Seller) describes the vehicle as an original big block car, which has piqued interest among potential buyers. @Hokiefan1 expresses appreciation for the car's aesthetics, particularly the wheels and stance, indicating that it could be appealing on the road as well. @Jake_Angel finds the car to be 'cool' and suggests that with additional comments from the seller, interest could be increased, highlighting the need for communication during the sale process.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @pmmeisner and @PlayingWCorvettes, request additional information regarding the convertible top and the engine, indicating a need for more clarity about the vehicle's current state and history. @Davemak1 asks specifically about power steering, while @Hokiefan1 suggests adding a driving video and cold start video to showcase the car further. Commenters like @AR66-67cars have provided observations about the vehicle's details, noting an issue with the door and suggesting more detailed pictures would be beneficial.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car's authenticity and overall condition. @norbenator questions the seller's claim of the car being an original big block and requests documentation to substantiate this. @jimmy1767 points out the various modifications that could lead to uncertainty regarding the car's original components, emphasizing that documentation is key. @AR66-67cars admits to initial confusion about the year-related details but is still puzzled by the visible fasteners on the door, reflecting ongoing doubts about the car's authenticity and build quality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @997TTS expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, believing it will do well in the market. @DaveInTahoe shared admiration for the Mezger engine and its tasteful modifications, highlighting the low mileage and three pedals as appealing features, stating he feels envy for the future buyer. @OvertonAutomotive called the vehicle one of the best cars ever made, while @Millys (The Seller) engaged with interested buyers, assuring them about the car’s pedigree and intended to address their inquiries promptly.
Neutral: Several comments show a mix of curiosity and interest in specific aspects of the vehicle. @hikingalpine21 inquired about the availability of original seats, indicating a desire to maintain authenticity. @alfriedesq expressed excitement regarding the car while also contemplating the balance of selling or restoring their own 997.1. @x8902604 raised a question about potential aftermarket bumper options, showcasing a unique preference, while @titleistaddict87 sought clarification on paint history. Both @93FDguy and @Millys (The Seller) provided insights into paint protection film and original paint claims, highlighting the technical discussions among enthusiasts.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding potential mechanical issues, particularly around coolant pipes. @Rcgltd prompted further discussion on an oil leak, leading to a response from @Millys (The Seller) about minor seepage. @1Kettel and @regular highlighted that intercooler pipe issues had been addressed at some level by Porsche, but @M_Blitz and @skyline23 challenged that assertion, pointing out there is still uncertainty around the effectiveness of repairs and the persistence of failures. @alfriedesq criticized the obsessive focus on coolant pipes, suggesting long-term reliability has been satisfactory for his own vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @CRUSH describes the vehicle as one of the coolest long roofs ever built, and @remuda-ian expresses disbelief that anyone would want to sell such a beast. @FLGT shares their experience owning this car, highlighting its meticulous maintenance and immaculate condition, claiming it was a fabulous example that attracted a lot of attention due to its beautiful black diamond paint and powerful performance. @57charlie believes the six-speed manual transmission enhances its appeal, while @nickarpey0610 notes that the car has received a lot of love on social media due to its rarity, suggesting it's a dream car for many enthusiasts.
Neutral: @LM_67Bird mentions that having a low mileage vehicle may need refreshing due to age but acknowledges 14 years is a reasonable time frame. They also reflect on the car's potential as amazing in states with no inspections, noting its quick resale history. @newcarpro provides detailed information about the vehicle, including its build date and options which may interest buyers looking for specific features.
Negative: @v8440 raises concerns about the legal implications of the vehicle being sold without catalytic converters, emphasizing that while enthusiasts understand the reason, it's illegal and could deter potential buyers. @BabyD69 expresses skepticism over the rapid turnover of owners, suggesting that three owners within a year could indicate issues with the vehicle or its desirability. @Gigi2020 questions whether the removed catalytic converters are included in the sale, hinting at a lack of clarity or transparency surrounding the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @littlehandegan expressed that the vehicle is very cool and nice, receiving support from @rossgivens who was eager to see @littlehandegan's opinion. @USM called the truck nice and asked several detailed questions about its features and modifications, suggesting a level of interest in its condition. @ramble59, the seller, provided informative and courteous responses about the vehicle's design and functionality, including confirmation of the sunroof's operation and an assertion that everything in the wagon works as intended.
Neutral: The seller, @ramble59, addressed several inquiries regarding the vehicle's history, including modifications such as the powder-coated side strips and painted chrome elements instead of wraps. There was discussion about the vinyl wrap applied to the vehicle’s exterior before @ramble59's purchase, and assurances were made that no previous bodywork was evident. The topic of the lien and auction process was also clarified by the seller, ensuring transparency about the title transfer after the sale due to the lien-holder involvement.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Hunter1969 regarding the vehicle's past, specifically about a burn mark on the passenger seat and whether it had been smoked in; @ramble59 reassured them that he is a non-smoker and the mark was not a cigarette burn. Additionally, there was some uncertainty about the functionality of the locking differentials, with @ramble59 admitting they did not engage properly during a test. @hpark006 also pointed out noticeable seat repair work, indicating potential issues with the vehicle's interior that might need further clarification.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle for its beauty and condition. @CKart mentioned it as a "good truck," while @dmnmkmcm5 and @etarasov echoed similar sentiments by calling it a "beauty" and a "beautiful example" respectively. @jboji514 also expressed admiration for the interior color, claiming not to find anything to nitpick at and describing it as a beautiful example.
Neutral: The seller, @genevamotorcars, provided various pieces of information about the vehicle in response to potential buyers' queries. For instance, they confirmed that all metal body panels have original paint and shared details about service history and various video requests made by buyers. They also made assertions regarding the condition of components like brake pads and control arms, maintaining that the vehicle is well-maintained.
Negative: However, some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's history. @tiresmoke55 questioned the rapid mileage increase without service records, and @Kawub4ik inquired about any possible repairs made by the previous dealer. Additionally, @EricRow requested clarification on the vehicle's service history, highlighting discrepancies in its geographical movement and upkeep. All these comments suggest caution in the buying process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @davethewave911 expressed his excitement for the vehicle, noting its unique Bermuda Blue color and encouraging the owner to be different and enjoy the ride. @Spudster also shared enthusiasm, mentioning the great ride quality and inspiration from the vehicle's aesthetic while noting similarities to his own model. @lynchmob561 adored the wrap color and showed willingness to learn to drive a manual transmission, indicating strong appreciation for the vehicle's visual appeal.
Neutral: @M1SRT inquired about the underlying paint color beneath the wrap and the duration the vinyl wrap has been applied, demonstrating curiosity about the vehicle's details. @Plumber2 and @newcarpro provided factual and technical information about the vehicle, including build details and specifications. Others, such as @CajonGreg, solicited further information about the functionality of the vehicle’s top and the seller's responsiveness to questions, indicating a need for clearer communication regarding the vehicle's features.
Negative: @jer4cars raised concerns about the condition of the wrap, pointing out lifting issues in certain photos while also asking about a missing battery cover. @StevenDDS questioned the lien situation, expressing uncertainty about the payment process and the amount owed, which could be a red flag for potential buyers. @JMFlorida and @lynchmob561 expressed skepticism about the seller's transparency regarding the wrap's condition and reserve status, indicating a level of caution and doubt surrounding the sale.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the vehicle's remarkable condition, with many users expressing admiration for its aesthetics and performance. @KeithM17 referred to the E30 M3 as "Nice looking" and @wgm shared additional photos of the original wheels, which also garnered praise. @Lengrep described it as going "better than showroom condition" and several others, like @johanwarner and @HarrisCountyDriver, noted its stunning look, particularly in the silver color. @PTGLTW recognized it as a "gem" with perfect mileage for a driveable car, while @Christopher_Kohler expressed his long-standing admiration for the M3, indicating its value in the community.
Neutral: There were inquiries regarding the vehicle's details, such as whether it has a protective front coating, as highlighted by @NIKISUPREME. @PTGLT asked about the paint's originality, to which @wgm confirmed that other than a minor touch-up, the paint is original. Concern over minor chipping was also addressed by @wgm, pointing out specific photos. Other comments included queries about registration and smog compliance in California from @amirsahe, with @wgm providing clarity on the vehicle's registration history.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, there were some concerns raised, particularly from potential buyers. @Ro_JaBoy inquired about touch-ups on the door, indicating unease about the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @amirsahe expressed skepticism regarding California registration and smog compliance for the car, which could deter intrigued buyers. While the seller assured that the vehicle has been registered and met emissions standards, concerns about the touch-up and registration may linger for some interested parties.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed interest in the vehicle, praising its unique features and potential. @CoolCustomsGarage looked forward to seeing a video of the car, indicating a positive anticipation for its performance. @Wingsmack found the skull and crossbones design intriguing, appreciating the hand-painted aspect. Furthermore, @TedHopson was impressed with the engine, noting the high horsepower rating of 535hp from the Ford Racing crate engine, which adds to the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: Comments also included inquiries about the car's details, demonstrating curiosity without strong positive or negative sentiments. @SkyKing1994 asked about the vehicle's original motor and build date. @Teutonss showcased interest in importing the car but needed additional documentation on its year of construction, highlighting a practical need rather than a reflection of its quality. @Cantech (The Seller) provided answers to these questions, offering insights into the vehicle's history and features, which helped clarify some details for potential buyers.
Negative: However, there were some concerns raised by users regarding certain features of the vehicle. @tinfitness pointed out a potential safety issue with the carpet being too close to the gas pedal, which could pose a risk if it were to get stuck. Additionally, @The_Barcode_Guy raised questions about the interior space, noting that the pedal box might be tight for taller drivers. These comments reflect a cautious perspective on the vehicle's design, indicating that while it has appeal, there are factors that might deter some prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the 1967 MGB, highlighting its solid condition and appealing aesthetics. @Miatadon emphasizes that it is a fine example of an MGB he previously owned, while other enthusiasts like @knb53 and @Bnolan describe the car as gorgeous and very nice respectively. Several commenters mention the quality of restoration with @safetyfast sharing insights about his meticulous refurbishment process and encouraging potential buyers to reach out with questions. Others, including @Mgh20180 and @tim_t, agree that it's an exceptional vehicle with significant upgrades, making it more usable and enjoyable to drive. The seller, @Sierra_Classic_Sportscar, presents the car as a rare find, inviting bidders with confidence in both the vehicle and the auction process.
Neutral: Various interactions discuss specific features and the history of the car, with comments reflecting curiosity and requests for additional information. @gg12 asks for clarification regarding the extent of bodywork done during restoration, while @Wheelyneat inquires about the authenticity of certain elements such as the tail lamp lenses. Additionally, @jwalld1962 provides a balanced view, noting that while the MGB is well-maintained, it could benefit from attention to the underside. The seller, @Sierra_Classic_Sportscar, responds with details about the car's history and restoration, explaining that it was originally a California car and has been sympathetically restored, preserving its original character. Videos of the car in action were also mentioned, indicating transparency in showcasing the vehicle's performance.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition are raised by a few commenters. @Jwalld1962 points out signs of corrosion in the engine bay and the need for further detailing on the underside, suggesting that it may not be in pristine condition compared to other examples. Additionally, @ACDarata questions the appearance of the painted red exhaust parts, and @mopey69 expresses dissatisfaction with the quality of the videos provided, suggesting they lack depth. @gg12 seeks more detailed documentation on the restoration work, particularly regarding the handling of rust issues. This mix of critiques indicates that while the MGB is generally well-received, there are imperfections that some buyers might want to consider before bidding.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the 2000 Honda Acty Attack, highlighting its appealing design and impressive capabilities. @Darthie remarks on its attractive appearance, while @Azure13 shares a positive experience visiting @GeoLineJDMImports, praising his helpfulness and the enjoyable test drive offered. @solidlifters calls it one of the best mini trucks seen on the platform, noting its unique features like air conditioning and 4WD, which add to its appeal.
Neutral: Several comments focus on specific details and inquiries about the vehicle. @JLsKA510 asks whether the truck can pass California smog checks and about its highway speed capabilities, to which @GeoLineJDMImports acknowledges that it cannot meet CA requirements but can handle local roads well. @CR77Racing requests an estimated shipping cost to his zip code, and @funcitychris queries the nature of touch-up paint and the condition of the vehicle prior to painting, showcasing a keen interest in the truck's history and care.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the vehicle's compatibility with certain regulations and shipping costs. @JLsKA510 notes the absence of these trucks in San Diego, alluding to the difficulties of owning such a vehicle in California due to smog laws. @solidlifters also highlights how shipping costs may exclude him from the bidding competition, indicating a barrier for potential buyers located far from the seller.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the car's appearance, highlighting its sharp look and sunroof as notable features. @mick59 noted that the sunroof is a big bonus, emphasizing its rarity with only 10% of production units featuring this option. @hierogk mentioned the benefits of this model, recognizing the love and care from the previous owner, reflecting the sentiment that the vehicle has been well-loved and beautifully restored. @MGT1964 (The Seller) shared positive memories and experiences of the car being in the family for almost 30 years, which adds to its sentimental value and appeal.
Neutral: Several comments seek more information or clarification about the car's features, such as the age of the tires from @foozy100 and the request for video walkarounds from @gauldingr. @barnkeeper asked if the headlights had been upgraded, while @agm008 inquired about the engine's mileage since installation. These comments indicate interest in learning more about the car's condition and maintenance history, demonstrating that potential buyers are engaged and want to make informed decisions before bidding.
Negative: There are some concerns raised about specific aspects of the vehicle's restoration, particularly regarding potential modifications. @canadian pointed out the non-stock radio and expressed hope that the dash wasn't cut for its installation. @broodie questioned the interior's originality, leading to clarifications from @MGT1964 (The Seller) about the restoration process. Additionally, @gauldingr mentioned a dent on the roof, asking about its cause, which could raise questions about the car's history and integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @anlenke's comment highlights the car's appealing color, which his father called "Marriage Time Blue," suggesting it has lasting value. @fipenna enthusiastically refers to the vehicle as a "jewel," validating its aesthetic allure. @PORSCHAA also emphasizes the car's impressive appearance, describing it as a showstopper in person. Moreover, @chicashflow appreciates its specifications and believes it should remain in one stable, indicating it is a remarkable example in the market. Additionally, @965 praises the car's rare attributes and high-quality respray, suggesting it checks all the boxes for a collector's piece.
Neutral: Several community members have asked for more information regarding the car's history and specifications. @abbcaz, for instance, inquires about the service records and cold start video, which @Goldstein (The Seller) adeptly addresses by committing to upload additional videos. @rafaelme and @Goldstein also engage in a discussion about the absence of the VIN sticker, with @Goldstein clarifying that such differences are common in Euro-spec cars. @MC911 suggests a compression test as a way to validate performance, which @Goldstein responds to by providing detailed cylinder readings from a recent test, indicating transparency with potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the positive comments surrounding the car, concerns about the vehicle's authenticity have arisen. @rafaelme flags the absence of a VIN sticker as potentially problematic, implying issues regarding the vehicle's provenance. This sentiment is echoed by @Garyc, who points out warning lights during the cold start. Community members like @Freemason and @Detmoor express frustration over the flagging of legitimate concerns about the vehicle's repaint and history, indicating a struggle for transparency in the discussion. By sharing their insights, they highlight potential red flags, generating doubt among prospective buyers about the car’s true condition and history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the motorcycle's aesthetics and performance, with @RedRon noting its beauty and @ejhansen05 calling it a "fantastic bike" that would bring happiness to its next owner. @AprilBob shared nostalgia about owning a similar bike and its thrill on open roads, while @TFOG praised its powerful performance and commented on its comfortable ride with modifications. The owner's meticulous care was highlighted by multiple commenters, including @jbeinhor, who vouched for the bike's excellent condition and @PORSCHAA, who described the seller as a meticulous collector and enthusiast, ensuring a well-maintained machine.
Neutral: Some comments focused on technical aspects and history related to the model, with @M66 questioning the engine compatibility and @pockomoth asking specifically about brake maintenance. @lshutche described their own experience with a similar model, noting both 'smooth power' and some discomfort from the seating position. The seller (@ratso70) provided detailed answers regarding the bike's brakes and offered to replace the tires if the buyer desired a ride home, reflecting openness and willingness to ensure customer satisfaction.
Negative: Several comments raised concerns, particularly regarding the bike's brakes and tires. @pockomoth highlighted the potential dangers of the powered brakes if not properly maintained. The seller acknowledged these concerns but asserted that the brakes had been well cared for, although they noted issues like the front brake occasionally squeaking and the need for a labor-intensive maintenance process. Additionally, @wmcnair pointed out the audacity of a no-reserve auction, while @insideline expressed caution about the ABS system's reliability, mentioning it could be expensive to repair if faulty.
![]() |
4k-Mile Rubitrux-Modified 2022 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon 392
1C4JJXSJ7NW236634
Lot 202434
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed excitement about the 2022 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon 392, highlighting its potential to be a great bargain. @newcarpro noted it could be the bargain of the year, while @mrw1 praised it as the best Jeep he's ever owned, despite high fuel consumption. Many enthusiasts shared their admiration for its features, including the 8-speed transmission which is described as 'pure magic' for cruising at high speeds. The vehicle is confirmed to have heated seats and steering wheel, adding to its appeal, as mentioned by @Calli74.
Neutral: Comments from @djb_rh emphasized the reliability of the shop that worked on the vehicle, indicating a good reputation. There were also inquiries about the vehicle's options and features, including concerns about discrepancies between listed options and actual modifications. For instance, @cfensty asked about the presence of heated/cooled seats, while @markno pointed out potential emissions compliance issues, reflecting a general interest in verifying the vehicle's attributes and history.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding inconsistencies between the modifications listed and the actual features present on the vehicle, as pointed out by @b6fam and @Calli74. Commenters, including @mbartholome and @Johnaustin, expressed skepticism about the description and invoicing, implying there could be misleading information about the vehicle's upgrades. Additionally, @cfensty questioned the need for brake rotor replacements at such low mileage, and several users requested clarification about the vehicle's history and modifications, suggesting a level of suspicion around the seller's representations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous comments highlight the 2021 718 Spyder as an exceptional vehicle, with @Best_Of_Show expressing admiration for its aesthetics and performance. @List-Renn shared a glowing testimonial about their own experience with a similar model, noting the car's suitability for spirited road trips. The community members appreciate the vehicle's capability, asserting that its power and handling provide an exhilarating driving experience, while also acknowledging the appealing design that stands out on the road.
Neutral: Comments also provided factual information about the car's history and specifications. @DG99 (The Seller) clarified the situation regarding the mileage records and the Porsche Certified Pre-Owned (CPO) warranty, which extends until February 2028, assuring potential buyers of the vehicle's reliability. The discussion also touched on the audio system, with some users including @carznut and @Tom78737 comparing the Bose sound system favorably, while noting that the focus should be on the driving experience rather than the sound system.
Negative: However, not all feedback was completely positive. @onehussler questioned the inclusion of a 'Smoking Package' without clarity on its implications or previous use, and there were concerns voiced about the pricing and market situation. @Tuberider noted that some model orders were reportedly closed, while others like @Best_Of_Show emphasized not letting such factors deter interest in this particular sale. Overall, while there was enthusiasm for the Spyder, potential buyers remained cautious about various practical aspects and market conditions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters acknowledge the unique appeal of the Camaro, especially its history as a pace car for the 2011 Daytona 500. @youngmotorcars (The Seller) expresses excitement about presenting such a distinctive vehicle, which also has a connection to country star Brad Paisley. @Jeepwayoflife contributes positive remarks about the car's beauty and cool historical significance, indicating potential value for collectors.
Neutral: Several users, including @scottelder and @RavenThree, raise inquiries about the vehicle's title status and the implications of its salvage title. @youngmotorcars (The Seller) responds to these inquiries, clarifying that while the vehicle was never formally titled or registered, it remains a valuable piece of automotive history. The discussion includes uncertainty about the ability to register the car for road use, which is contingent on local regulations.
Negative: There are notable concerns regarding the salvage title of the Camaro, with multiple commenters @2014LTDLTZ and @Jeepwayoflife expressing disappointment over the implications this title has for street legality. They warn that it could restrict the car's usability and emphasize the difficulty in changing the title status back to a standard title. User @RavenThree articulates skepticism about how to navigate repair documentation without damage to support potential future title changes.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Tigerman1953’s bike has received glowing comments with enthusiasts expressing admiration for its beauty and potential. @Steve7, for instance, praises the bike while also sharing his own interest in listing another model. Overall, commenters appreciate the quality and aesthetics of the vehicle, indicating a strong interest in its features and performance.
Neutral: @pursang engages in a friendly discussion with @Tigerman1953 about other motorcycles in the seller's collection, showcasing a shared passion for vintage bikes. The conversation also reflects a sense of community among motorcycle enthusiasts, with @PDXBryan reminiscing about the past and his riding gear in relation to the bike. This neutral dialogue reveals a camaraderie among users rather than just a focus on the vehicle itself, highlighting personal connections and memories associated with motorcycling.
Negative: The mood takes a somber turn with @Tigerman1953’s revelation about a serious motorcycle accident that prevented him from providing a start run video of the bike. He expresses concern that this accident may deter potential buyers, as he is currently bedridden and unable to showcase the bike as planned. @Steve7’s comment signifies sympathy for the seller's situation, underlining a concern for @Tigerman1953’s health and the unfortunate impact on the sale.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the 2023 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat as an impressive vehicle, praising aspects such as its stunning color and overall aesthetic appeal. @ACRSNK complimented the 'great color,' while @jgilj53 expressed satisfaction with the car's appearance, saying it was ordered just how they would have liked. Buyers appreciate the careful handling and low mileage, with @galevin pointing out the value of keeping it in pristine condition for potential buyers, reinforcing the idea that a car retains its excitement when not overused.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Queuedcars, had positive interactions with the seller, describing them as 'TOP notch people' and expressing confidence in their business practices. @GoodBros, the seller, engaged positively while addressing inquiries about the car's history and condition, providing transparency about its usage. The seller communicated effectively, reassuring interested parties that the vehicle has been mostly kept in the showroom since its arrival.
Negative: Conversely, there were comments expressing curiosity about why dealers might be holding onto such cars, with @Juiced55 questioning if this was a general trend. @parshooter contributed a perspective on the performance aspects, mentioning the 1/4 mile time, but also seemed to hint at a preference for driving the car rather than just admiring it in a showroom. This indicates a sentiment that while the car is visually appealing, its true charm lies in the thrill of driving it, which can be diminished if not utilized properly.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @NBates90 expresses appreciation for the vehicle's color, indicating a personal affinity for its aesthetic. @flred62 shares a nostalgic connection, recalling a similar car owned by their father, which adds a sentimental touch to the positive comments. @kjohn1 commends the seller, @richeaton, for their commitment to maintaining the car, highlighting the meticulous care it has received over the years, which is often a point of admiration for car enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Willy431 raises questions about the purpose of the straps in the trunk area, seeking clarification on their intended use, which reflects curiosity about the vehicle's design features. @Swoope provides information about the introduction of T-tops, contributing to a factual discussion about the model's history. @Schroeder confirms that the vehicle did not come with factory air conditioning, supporting the conversational tone of sharing knowledge about the car's specifications.
Negative: @f90s63 reflects on their past experience with the model, mentioning that heavy use took a toll on their similar vehicle, which hints at potential durability concerns. They also question the absence of air conditioning in the specific model, showing a level of disappointment in the features available. Overall, while the comments are largely positive, there is a subtle undercurrent of concern regarding the car's performance over time as expressed by @f90s63.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is highly praised by @HKMotors (The Seller) for its unique options and features, such as a third-row seat, active air ride suspension, and M-Sport package, which contribute to a fun driving experience. Enthusiastic comments highlight the car's excellent maintenance history, with @HKMotors stating that it has been meticulously cared for by its previous owner. This X5 has been regularly serviced, and many common fail items have been replaced, giving prospective buyers comfort that they are purchasing a reliable vehicle.
Neutral: Comments from potential buyers have ranged from inquiries about the car's condition to requests for additional details, such as service records and maintenance performed on the vehicle. @EJWinters3 asked if service records were available, while @Virafp wanted to confirm the workings of various features like the AC, heat, and entertainment system. @HKMotors has responded promptly to these questions, providing insights into the vehicle's condition and offering to provide videos showcasing its operation.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about potential reliability issues associated with this model. @FeloniousMonk noted that although the vehicle has been well cared for, reliability concerns still linger among these models due to known issues. Additionally, @Teutonss asked if all necessary oil changes had been completed, indicating a cautious approach towards the vehicle's maintenance history. Overall, while the vehicle is well-maintained, some commenters remain wary of the legitimacy of previously claimed repairs without documented service records.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @offsideundo points out that the bid choice seems reasonable, noting that this was the amount paid initially for the vehicle. The seller, @cntlaltdel, has responded to queries with transparency, stating the compression test numbers and actions taken to clarify concerns about oil leaks by providing additional photos and videos of the vehicle. @cntlaltdel also acknowledges the confusion surrounding the photos, first addressing the discrepancy noticed by @tr6-driver and providing context that there were two similar vehicles in the shop.
Neutral: Several commenters are attempting to clarify their understanding of the vehicle's condition and details presented in the photos. @mgeoff expresses confusion about the photo numbers, which indicates a level of complexity in the image gallery provided. @cntlaltdel, the seller, actively engaged by admitting to the photographic mix-up, stating that an image of a different Pimento TR was mistakenly included in the ad and confirming the information about the compression numbers, indicating a degree of thoroughness in addressing customer inquiries.
Negative: There are inherent concerns raised by various commenters regarding the vehicle's condition. @Oblio mentions the absence of compression test numbers initially, leading to wariness about the vehicle's mechanical state. @tommyrae1234's inquiry about the source of an oil leak indicates possible hidden issues, while @tr6-driver and @mgeoff's discussions reveal uncertainty about the authenticity and accuracy of the vehicle's images, suggesting that potential discrepancies could affect buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz praises the Thunderbird as a delightful vehicle with a lovely color combination of white over black and white, calling it a wonderful specimen. @birddoc also notes the car's overall condition, remarking that it is almost totally original, which suggests high quality. Further supporting this, @Gord confirms that the car features a correct 1957 factory original non-porthole top, indicating that the vehicle has authentic parts.
Neutral: @gocorcoran remarks on an interesting workaround for a burned-through choke heat riser, suggesting there are available parts for those looking for a factory-correct restoration. Additionally, @Zog1 expresses interest in viewing the car in person, indicating a proactive interest that could lead to a potential sale. @fgallo inquires about the vehicle’s condition under the undercoating and asks for detailed photos, suggesting familiarity with car restoration and care while underlining the importance of a thorough inspection.
Negative: @Mordizzle raises a concern regarding the possible replacement of the top, implying that it may not be as original as claimed. Although @birddoc expresses admiration for the car, they also mention a potential worry about the heavy undercoating potentially hiding issues, hinting at a need for caution. This raises some uncertainty about the car's overall integrity and authenticity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, with @ALAustin calling it a "beautiful ride" and @GordonBombay94 referring to it as a "beaut". @GBRBiLL provided additional technical information, noting the vehicle has 4-wheel disc brakes, which was well-received by fellow enthusiasts. The seller, @ColonelCowboy, shared a detailed history of the vehicle, emphasizing its Italian origins and the car's prior life as a daily driver in Italy, which helped establish trust in the vehicle's quality. Commenters also appreciated the seller's prompt responses to questions, highlighting an engaged and informative atmosphere around the listing.
Neutral: Several questions were raised about the vehicle, indicating potential buyers are gathering information before making a decision. @MundtAutoSolutions inquired about maintenance needs, to which @ColonelCowboy confirmed that no additional upkeep was necessary. Other questions included the presence of air conditioning and smog equipment, as well as inquiries about the removable hardtop and safety features like rear jump seat seatbelts. The seller's informative responses helped clarify these details for prospective buyers, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the vehicle's specs.
Negative: There were a few minor criticisms and concerns from potential buyers. For example, @Maverick_007 questioned whether the hardtop was easily removable, while @camp6ell pointed out the use of a speedometer in km/h, which could be a drawback for those unfamiliar with metric measurements. Additionally, @ebower01 raised concerns regarding air conditioning and emissions testing, highlighting that the lack of AC and the vehicle's status with regard to smog testing might be deterrents for some buyers. Overall, while the vehicle was largely received positively, these comments reflect certain reservations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the car for its mechanical quality and driving experience. @GDogg appreciated the presentation of the 356B Coupe and @DrRocket mentioned fond memories of his own similar Porsche, highlighting the enjoyment that can be found in driving it despite imperfections. @bg191 (The Seller) reassured potential buyers about the car's impressive service history, emphasizing its reliability, while @Ypss36 called it a "great time machine," expressing hope that it continues to bring smiles to others.
Neutral: Multiple inquiries and requests for additional details about the car were shared throughout the comments. @kkay expressed interest in more pictures of specific areas, while @Flunder908 posed several questions regarding the installation of a new muffler and damage to the front lid. @356mike provided insights into California license plate regulations, suggesting alternatives to the missing original plates and engaging in a discussion about registration options.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car needing restoration and possible issues with its physical condition. @Bonanzajock mentioned it may need a complete restoration, and @Grimsby noted that others tend to focus on the negative aspects of cars like this that are more driver-oriented. @prescue expressed that if adjustments to the link pins couldn't be made, more serious maintenance might be required, indicating potential ongoing issues that could detract from the car's appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Alfonse22 noted the vehicle's appealing aesthetic, while @Hoppy18 praised it as a good value for its class, calling it the best 'Bang for the (Italian) Buck'. @dmonieson shared a personal positive experience, stating that the 1993 model is a lot of fun to drive and adding that it's a great car overall. @alfa1993 (The Seller) reinforced the fun driving experience, promising to share videos demonstrating the car's capabilities, which add to its charm.
Neutral: @alfa1993 (The Seller) provided comprehensive responses to inquiries about the car's history and features. For example, in response to @Richard2222's question regarding the original color, the seller clarified that the Verde Inglese is indeed the original color with some touch-ups. When asked by @GMZ about the hard top, the seller confirmed that the car only comes with a soft top but mentioned that the AC is working fine. The seller further addressed the speedometer issue for @kdowney1966 and @Richard2222 by explaining that it is currently stuck at 17 and hasn't been repaired due to a recent occurrence, reassuring potential buyers about the car's performance.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Richard2222 regarding the vehicle's repaint history, with some confusion stemming from conflicting information about the paint's original state. The seller attempted to clarify that while previous records mentioned repainting, the original color is likely the same based on the condition of the under-hood photos. Additionally, @kdowney1966 expressed hesitation about embarking on a long drive in the vintage car, indicating uncertainty about its reliability for such a journey, especially given the known speedometer issue.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received praise for its overall design and modern features, particularly the grey/pearl interior and factory designo matte exterior. Commenters appreciate the transparency of the seller regarding vehicle maintenance, especially concerning the water pump, which is acknowledged to be a known failure point. The reports of the car being rust-free due to its history in Texas without exposure to snow or salt is also valued, making the vehicle seem more appealing to potential buyers looking for a reliable option in this model.
Neutral: Several inquiries have been made regarding the vehicle's history, maintenance needs, and specifics like the cargo cover and headrest inclusion. The seller has responded accordingly, providing details about the accident, confirming included features, and explaining that the water pump may need replacement soon, along with associated costs. Questions about the vehicle's speedometer conversion capabilities from miles to kilometers and requests for specific maintenance records have been addressed, indicating a solid back-and-forth communication between the seller and prospective buyers.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, there are concerns noted about the vehicle's rear-end collision history, with a request for more information about the severity of past damages. Some potential buyers raised inquiries about the future maintenance costs, specifically regarding the water pump replacement which could amount to around $4,000. The condition of the roof and whether it has sustained any damage, as well as the functionality of the lumbar support in the seats, were questions that reflected some skepticism and the need for clarification before proceeding.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the 2005 Honda S2000, highlighting its beautiful design and well-preserved condition. Commentors such as @Henryturchi and @Blue_Horseshoe describe the vehicle as a "stunner" and "absolutely beautiful," creating an overall impression of appreciation for the car's aesthetic appeal. Additionally, the seller, @HeatherHill, provides thorough documentation of the vehicle's history and maintenance, which may instill confidence in potential buyers about its quality and reliability.
Neutral: The seller, @HeatherHill, shares extensive details about the car's options and conditions, along with insights into previous ownership. The mention of the factory hardtop and documentation of accessories adds value to the auction, as seen in the inquiries from potential buyers like @Marc08EX and @dennisev, who ask about the accessories and hardtop shipping logistics. This interaction suggests a level of interest and engagement from the auction community, indicating that the vehicle has unique features worth discussing.
Negative: While the overall comments are positive, there are some practical concerns raised by potential bidders. For instance, @Swalker3111 queries about fitting comfortably in the vehicle due to their height, which hints at possible discomfort for taller individuals. Additionally, marks were noted on the front spoiler from the original owner's driveway, acknowledged by @HeatherHill, which may lead some to question the vehicle's condition despite its otherwise pristine state.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters enthusiastically praise the vehicle, noting its vibrant Dakar Yellow color and its rarity as a European-spec E36 M3. @MCLeather reminisces about the fun they had with their own M3. @Shomoil and @wxflyer highlight the car's striking aesthetics and the excitement it evokes, while @RealDealDrive mentions its attention-grabbing presence in urban settings. @AHLong describes the car as the best Japanese spec E36 M3 they've seen, acknowledging its impressive undercarriage and overall condition. Both @Raucky88M3 and @Argenrican express admiration for the car's driving experience, mentioning how engaging it is to drive, particularly the sound and responsiveness of the engine.
Neutral: Several comments bring up technical aspects of the car that are neither strongly positive nor negative. @Braco23 questions the exact horsepower of the motor, and @TSRHB points out an invoice that mentions low compression and valve adjustments, asking for clarification from the seller. @staytontyacke provides insights about European cars being available in both LHD and RHD configurations in Japan, further discussing the S50 engine's performance in comparison to US-spec models. The seller, @Amarzullo517, addresses multiple inquiries regarding maintenance and specifications, noting that they have comprehensive information available for potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments address concerns regarding the vehicle. @TSRHB mentions a clicking sound behind the dash and the uncertainty about stereo compatibility, which raises skepticism about the vehicle's condition. @AHLong notes that while the car is impressive, it does have aftermarket door panels that detract from its originality, hinting at the need for replacements that could add to the costs. @AMarzullo517 confirms the A/C system is converted to R134 but also mentions potential audio issues, which could impact buyer interest. Overall, while the vehicle has many admirers, there are valid points of concern regarding its modifications and functionality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Lancia 2000 HF, highlighting its beauty and unique characteristics. @ededed called it a beautiful car, while @gh356 praised the fantastic driving experience and styling that makes the Lancia stand out. @EdAdam appreciated the mix of classic design with modern features, noting the luxurious feel of the interior and the historical significance of its innovations, such as the stainless steel bumpers. @ironmotors (The Seller) emphasized the car's remarkable condition and its rarity, stating that it is almost impossible to find one in such good shape. Additionally, @djimbe and @doublegarage noted its aesthetic appeal and connection to classic vehicles, further emphasizing the enjoyment this car brings to enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters shared insightful observations about the Lancia, discussing its design lineage and engineering features. @Frank_Barrett likened it to a more powerful version of the Fulvia coupe, suggesting that while its carpet could be updated, the overall experience is what makes it enjoyable. @William_S mentioned attending classic car events where he has seen the car, supporting its original condition. @professorgearhead admired the car's understated elegance, comparing its engine bay to that of other vintage cars. @Boo25 resonated with the idea of preserving the leather's patina, suggesting a careful approach to maintenance that respects the car's age.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns regarding the Lancia’s condition and aspects of its design. @professorgearhead found the engine bay lacking in neatness compared to rivals like Alfa Romeo, suggesting it detracted from the overall appeal. @Frank_Barrett noted that while he appreciated the vehicle, it would require investment to upgrade certain elements, such as the carpet and leather interior. The criticism seemed tempered by an overall appreciation for the car's unique traits, but there was a sense that some aspects could be improved to enhance its charm.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect an enthusiastic reception for the 1977 Ford Bronco Sport being auctioned by @BeesleyMotorcars. @BeesleyMotorcars introduced the auction with excitement, indicating the vehicle's classic status and encouraging engagement from potential bidders. Many commenters, including @Andyp and @Nickgplv, demonstrated their interest and knowledge about the vehicle, confirming the antenna's identity and sharing insights about the possible lift measurements. Commenters like @FlyingCamel expressed their specific interest in the vehicle, indicating its appeal to a wide audience of classic car enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments highlighted technical aspects and features of the Bronco. Users posed questions about practical concerns such as the accommodation for taller drivers and technical specifications, including inquiries from @Todd_Z. regarding the lift height of the Bronco. @Moparguitar asked for close-up images of corrosion areas and specifics about the air conditioning, suggesting that information on vehicle condition is a priority for many potential buyers. @rlllcars inquired about the vehicle's handling at high speeds, indicating practical considerations are important to those considering a bid.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's condition and functionality. @Moparguitar specifically requested additional photos to assess the corrosion areas and broken weld points, highlighting potential red flags about the vehicle's maintenance. Furthermore, @rlllcars queried about the Bronco's ability to track well at speeds over 60 mph, suggesting skepticism about its performance on the road. Overall, while the Bronco was generally well-received and appreciated for its classic appeal, these inquiries hint at underlying worries about the vehicle’s mechanical soundness and exterior condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle, praising its condition and performance. @MartyKC and @boaboyoz commend the Camaro's overall appeal and quality, with @MartyKC referring to it as a 'Proud bitchin' Camaro' and @boaboyoz calling it a 'Wonderful Wisco Camaro.' @Excessiveind describes the car as a great driving Camaro that is fun for car shows and casual enjoyment, noting its solid build despite the age of its paint. @Viper0311 highlights the joy of driving the car by commenting on its status as a solid driver.
Neutral: Inquiry about the vehicle's specifics is present in the comments, with users like @moparmanbet asking for details about the engine and @tsirkucp inquiring about the transmission type. @Excessiveind responds to inquiries confirming the vehicle has a 1969 327 block, and identifies the transmission as an M22 close ratio 4-speed. The comments reflect a desire for more information, indicating interest but not necessarily forming a strong opinion about the vehicle's overall quality.
Negative: Some comments reveal concerns about the vehicle's physical condition, particularly regarding its paint job. @Viper0311 mentions that while the car is a great driver, the paint is 'in rough shape,' suggesting that there may be aesthetic issues that could deter potential buyers. Additionally, @troliver1's inquiry about leaks compels @Excessiveind to confirm there are none, indicating the necessity to clarify any doubts about the vehicle's reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle reflect excitement and admiration for its condition and rarity. @cantaffordit24 captures the enthusiasm by reminiscing about high school heroes, while @TurboR1391 rejoices in the summer of ITRs, highlighting a buzz in the community. Enthusiasts like @Vtec4ever express their appreciation with vivid imagery suggesting this car is not just an automobile, but a symbol of teenage dreams brought to life. @4DrDB8GsR praises its amazing qualities, calling it a potential new addition to his garage. The seller also showcases the vehicle as a collector-grade example, with 32,000 miles and meticulous documentation, underscoring its appeal to collectors.
Neutral: Several users have inquired about specific details related to the vehicle's specifications and modifications. @audidude engages in a discussion about whether the car is JDM spec or USDM and notes differences regarding engine and design elements. @cwalker985 and @Tnbusiness71, the seller, address questions surrounding importation processes and titles, confirming no tariffs for American buyers since the car is already titled in the U.S. They also clarify details about emissions compliance and importing procedures, which seem important to potential bidders. This exchange maintains a factual tone while providing insights on the buying process.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about potential issues with the vehicle. @binangret raises questions about the cigarette lighter's absence and the possibility of the front bumper being repainted, observations that are met with confirmations from @Tnbusiness71 and @Dumbmoney. Furthermore, some bidders note their impatience regarding responses due to a high volume of inquiries, such as @cwalker985, and they express a bit of skepticism regarding the time taken to answer questions. Concerns regarding minor details like the steering alignment and the speedometer's clear display of measurements also emerge, showcasing that prospective buyers are attentive to the vehicle's authenticity and presentation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg remarks on the vehicle, appreciating its style, while @motoken highlights its potential as a fantastic driver with the necessary modifications in place, suggesting that the hard work has already been done on the car. He notes the vehicle's rare color as an additional attractive feature, implying a strong interest in the vehicle despite already owning a similar model. The overall sentiment from these comments reflects a positive outlook on the car's appeal and its readiness for use after some attention.
Neutral: @Harry19 inquires about the maintenance history specifically regarding the clutch, and whether the vehicle would pass smog testing, reflecting a standard concern regarding vehicle condition and compliance. @MayneRacing (The Seller) provides a detailed response about the clutch replacement, which occurred in 2019 during an engine resealing, thus assuring potential buyers of some mechanical reliability. Additionally, the seller discusses HVAC issues including previous attempts to convert the AC system, indicating transparency about the vehicle's current operational states.
Negative: @nkee991 raises concerns about the HVAC system, specifically its persistent issue of being stuck on heat, which may deter potential buyers who prioritize comfort in their vehicles. This concern is echoed by @kdollar56, who suggests that this is a common problem and provides links to resources for troubleshooting, hinting at the need for further repairs. Although there is a potential for resolution, the mention of existing technical issues indicates a negative aspect of the vehicle that requires attention.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Mitch944 mentioned the amazing interior and called it a great example. @Jimmyblues1959 highlighted its rarity, noting it's uncommon to see a first-year RX7 in such pristine condition. @ycbmsma praised the car's rare plaid interior and exceptional photography, complementing the seller for a great presentation. @nittanylogan reflected on nostalgic memories tied to the RX7, emphasizing the car's beauty and affirming it as a great example of the model. @bartoli66 underscored the car's condition and positioned it as a collector item, remarking on its performance compared to other designs from the era. @tgfarrell commended the car's excellent condition and rarity, reinforcing its status as a notable classic.
Neutral: @911r (The Seller) provided details on the RX7, sharing the experience of being reacquainted with the car after many years and describing its performance. He assured potential bidders that there are no fuel leaks and confirmed the car drives as good as it looks. Several commenters, including @clemente102, asked questions about oil consumption and requested further information or videos of the car's driving performance. @Dean_G inquired about the engine swap in 2003, seeking clarification on the engine's condition and mileage since that replacement.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the car, including @clemente102 discussing potential oil and fuel leaks, while @Kokojimbo pointed out that the car seemed to be missing sunroof weatherstripping. @baltzerc attempted to clarify potential misunderstandings regarding these issues. Additionally, @sleepyfloyd reflected on previous experiences with similar cars, suggesting they may have nostalgia but also pointed out the specific details about the car that could potentially impact its value to collectors. Overall, some comments suggested unrealistic expectations from individuals unfamiliar with classic cars, as articulated by @bartoli66 and @tgfarrell, emphasizing the importance of understanding the vehicle's classic nature.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters consistently express admiration for the vehicle, with @TealTerror enthusiastically describing it as "Beautiful!" and @lucky6600 stating it is "just amazing." The aesthetic appeal is echoed by @nwmoto who finds the bike beautiful, while @MNberg calls it a "VERY STUNNING BMW." Notably, @Motogrotto highlights the impressive features, referring to it as a "super sweet last year R69US in Dover white big tank and solo seat." Several others, including @Bobsbikes and @my69, echo similar sentiments, emphasizing the bike's visual allure and quality. Overall, the vehicle is received positively for its design and craftsmanship.
Neutral: There is an informative discourse around the vehicle's restoration and components, facilitated by @WanderlustMC (The Seller). The seller clarifies that the slingers were cleaned during an engine overhaul, countering @nwmoto's implied concern. @Rbeemer raises a technical note regarding the bike's serial number and LK heads, which the seller confirms to be accurate. Additionally, @MNberg remarks on the restoration work done by Charlie Johnson, who is known for his expertise, suggesting that the bike's value is enhanced by his involvement. These comments highlight the technical specifications and the quality of restoration in a factual manner without expressing strong opinions.
Negative: While the majority of comments are positive, some subtle criticisms or concerns arise. @nwmoto suggests the need for more attention to the slinger service, implying that it should be more prominently communicated, as they were distracted by other price details in receipts. This concern indicates that potential buyers may seek clearer information on service history. However, it's important to note that this concern does not detract significantly from the overall positive sentiment surrounding the bike; it merely highlights aspects that could enhance the presentation and sale.
![]() |
24k-Mile 1995 Ford E-350 7.3L Power Stroke Ambulance 4x4 Conversion
1FDKE30F1SHB20907
Lot 202489
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle, highlighting its potential as an off-grid RV due to the robust Quigley 4x4 feature and highly praised its engine as the best available. @roverchef enthusiastically referred to it as the 'UNICORN of camper platforms,' suggesting that the vehicle is unique and will bring joy to its future owner. The attention to detail and aspects of the vehicle, such as the ability to potentially convert it back into an ambulance, has garnered interest and appreciation from the community.
Neutral: Several questions about the vehicle focused on technical specifications and usage, reflecting a practical interest. @jcently inquired about the interior height, while @gafoscpc1 asked about the shore power outlet for the rear A/C, indicating a need for functional insights. The seller, @CarsGlobal, provided detailed answers regarding the interior measurements, roof height, and the vehicle's registration options, showcasing transparency in communication and a readiness to assist potential buyers with their questions.
Negative: Some comments highlighted concerns or requests for further information that suggest potential drawbacks to the vehicle. @mlazarus asked about the current registration status, which raises questions about its usability right out of the lot. @Ifr's inquiry about the tire date code and the condition of the diamond plate suggests apprehension regarding maintenance and safety. Additionally, @DogsLoveCheese raised a concern about the wiring related to the removed external lights, hinting at a desire for more clarity about the vehicle's modifications.
![]() |
2,700-Mile 2000 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am WS6 Convertible 6-Speed
2G2FV32G0Y2128485
Lot 202497
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous positive comments, highlighting its beauty and condition. @GTO400fourspeed remarked on the vehicle's link to Pontiac drag racing history, suggesting the car has an intriguing story behind it. @jamin87ss praised the stunning silver and black color combination of the convertible design, while @2002WS6 noted agreement regarding the aesthetics of the vehicle. Overall, many commenters appreciate its high-quality condition, with @Mdhampton (The Seller) emphasizing that it has been well maintained, stored in a heated garage, and has no scratches or moisture exposure.
Neutral: Several commenters requested additional information and details about the vehicle. @Kaz791 inquired about the real window potentially sagging, prompting @Mdhampton (The Seller) to clarify that it is a production flaw and the window itself is in perfect condition. Others, like @Jharper402 and @98WS6, asked for videos and pictures of specific parts, such as the door panels, indicating a keen interest in the vehicle's details as potential buyers evaluate it further.
Negative: A few concerns were raised by commenters regarding the vehicle's features. @Kaz791 pointed out a potential issue with the rear window sagging, while @EngineCo345 questioned whether the Hurst shifter knob was installed incorrectly. Although @Mdhampton (The Seller) addressed these concerns promptly, providing reassurance about the vehicle’s features, such critiques reflect minor hesitations from the audience regarding specific details of the car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ASAdad praises the VW Touareg as an extremely reliable SUV with great towing capacity, noting it as the most reliable vehicle they have owned in 40 years of car ownership. @IMissMySaab shares a similar experience, highlighting their own Touareg's remarkable towing capabilities across extensive travel without significant issues. The seller, @d2xdt2, also expresses satisfaction with the vehicle, describing it as a dependable companion since its purchase in 2013 and detailing its low mileage and minimal wear due to careful usage and storage.
Neutral: Several buyers have requested more specific information and photos regarding the vehicle's condition. For instance, @Uby67vw1958 asks for undercarriage pictures, while @stefon993 inquires about the roof area and clearcoat status. @Fleuger99 seeks clarification on visible scratches and dents, and the seller has been responsive in providing requested images and descriptions, indicating the Touareg has minimal rust exposure and has received regular maintenance.
Negative: Some queries point towards potential concerns about the vehicle's condition. @TLang1030 asks about the brown coloring of a part of the dash, expressing uncertainty if it’s a lighting effect or replacement. @wallbenz questions the vehicle's driving performance at high speeds, looking for reassurance on stability and vibration. Additionally, @klpetru raises questions about whether any brake work or transmission servicing has been performed, indicating a cautious approach from potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Slam105 expressed enthusiasm for the rarity of the vehicle, noting its vintage appeal by calling it a "cool vintage beast." @Dollycat3 praised the Packard Super Eight Victoria convertible for its wonderful design and vibrant color, conveying a deep appreciation that resonates with other Packard enthusiasts. @GDogg remarked on the exclusivity of the Packard Convertible, while @bvd mentioned features like the red clutch pedal that signify its historic engineering, all highlighting the vehicle’s unique qualities and historical significance.
Neutral: The seller, @ekmcmullen, provided insight into the car's originality, asserting that it is believed to be 100% original, including its paint, interior, and drivetrain, with some minor wear that doesn't necessitate replacement. Comments like those from @CraigInPA and @Mcnwy1438 discussed technical aspects of the vehicle's clutch system and possible restoration options, respectively. The discussion also touched on the car's paint codes, indicating a mix of opinions on whether to maintain its current condition or restore it.
Negative: However, there were concerns raised by @hbodsillian about rust on the driver’s side rocker panels and whether repair panels exist for the model. @Lotusseven expressed a lack of appreciation for the car’s color, while several participants, including @Dollycat3 and @Mcnwy1438, engaged in a somewhat tense exchange regarding the perceived disrespect towards the vehicle's originality and history. Additionally, @Electraglider lamented that not enough appreciation is given to classic cars like this Packard, indicating a sentiment of diminishing interest in such vehicles as the enthusiasts age.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters such as @BobSoCal and @JohnF1966 praised the car, noting its impressive NCRS Top Flight status and quality, with @BobSoCal declaring it a "darn nice car" and @JohnF1966 emphasizing the thorough inspections it underwent from qualified judges. @FullSizeL72 appreciated the car's original styling, specifically mentioning the gold line tires and how they complement the vehicle's aesthetic. Other users echoed similar sentiments, with @Muscleguy69 simply exclaiming, "Wow just wow!" suggesting strong admiration for the vehicle's presentation. @Tobyallen remarked on the beauty of the comments exchanged, highlighting the knowledge shared among Corvette enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions about specific details and performance aspects of the vehicle without strong opinions in either direction. @Gloccamora inquired about additional pictures of documentation related to the car, while @chiefj48 (The Seller) assured that he would try to provide more information as requested. @4tugo1972 sought confirmation regarding the vehicle's no-hit body status, to which @chiefj48 confirmed positively, stating the car was thoroughly inspected by an expert. The dialogue included technical discussions regarding air cleaner decals, where @MebeR2 clarified the historical accuracy of such details about the 66 Corvette model, showing an interest in the specifics while maintaining respect for the car.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism or raised concerns, particularly regarding the air cleaner decal, with users like @14u2b expressing frustration over the focus on minor details instead of the vehicle's overall quality. @FullSizeL72's inquiry about possible deductions from NCRS judging prompted a debate over correctness and originality, leading to some tension in the comments about where the emphasis should lie. @thomasji also contributed by asking about operational features, indicating that while the overall impression is positive, there are underlying questions that some enthusiastic commenters felt were important to address, showcasing a divide between appreciation and concern about nitpicking details.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The Q7 offered by @genevamotorcars has garnered positive feedback for its condition and performance. Commenters like @Luz_do_sol highlighted their previous experience as a Q7 4.2 Premium owner, emphasizing the vehicle's reliability, powerful V8 engine, and reasonable gas mileage. Others expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's overall driving experience and expected satisfaction from the upcoming auction.
Neutral: Several commenters sought additional information about the Q7's features and condition. @KMBCars asked about the presence of air ride, while @amoon inquired about temporary tags for out-of-state buyers. @Urbanista raised concerns about the sunroof drains and their performance in heavy rain, indicating a prior negative experience with similar features in another vehicle. They also requested details regarding the trailer hitch and any included phone equipment.
Negative: Concerns have been noted regarding some vulnerabilities with the vehicle, primarily involving the panoramic roof's drainage system as mentioned by @Luz_do_sol and @Urbanista. These issues can lead to costly repairs if not addressed, particularly with water damage to the amplifier. Additionally, @Munch1950 and @KMBCars questioned the absence of air shocks, suggesting that not having this feature could be a downside for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the appeal and desirability of the Porsche 356 Speedster replica. @GatorDMD expressed enthusiasm with "Gotta love these!!!!", while @onemorebid1 simply exclaimed, "wow, this one is nice". The seller, @CARFINDERDAVID, also conveyed excitement and presented a heartfelt backstory of the vehicle, detailing the previous owner's promise to own the car after his deployment overseas, which adds sentimental value to the purchase.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's provenance and service history provided a mix of inquiries and appreciation. @CentervilleRAS acknowledged the vehicle as very nice but requested more information about its origin and whether there were service records available. @Call991 similarly inquired about the availability of service record receipts or the original build sheet. The seller, @CARFINDERDAVID, responded with a promise of transparency and an initiative to clarify the chassis number with Vintage Motorcars, indicating a willingness to assist potential buyers.
Negative: There are some concerns raised about the vehicle's authenticity and documentation. @CentervilleRAS pointed out that there was no record of the chassis number with Vintage Motorcars, casting doubt on its claimed heritage from Vintage Speedsters, and asked for more details related to any previous accidents or repairs. This concern was echoed by other bidders who are looking for assurances about the vehicle's history. The seller's acknowledgment of previous ownership changes and the complications in record-keeping added to the scrutiny around the vehicle's background.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed a desire for more information about the vehicle, indicating curiosity and interest in its condition. @IdahoTruckAndRV, the seller, provided reassurance about the truck's performance by stating, 'It starts right up and drives excellent!' Furthermore, the seller mentioned that while they do not have service records, the previous owner maintained the vehicle regularly and stored it in a garage, which could imply good upkeep.
Neutral: The discussion on the truck's bed length was quite informative, with @FlyingMuleRider initiating the conversation about whether it has a long bed or short bed. @obturate and @Mweidner confirmed that it's a short bed, which led to additional comments about differences in tank capacities between 2WD and 4WD configurations. The technical aspects of the truck were also addressed, notably concerning the rust treatment and frame maintenance, with @IdahoTruckAndRV clarifying that the frame had been steamed cleaned and painted, indicating diligence in its preservation.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the truck's condition, specifically regarding the frame and suspension. @Bigfitter questioned whether these components had been properly sandblasted prior to painting, suggesting that rust may have been inadequately handled. In addition, @Notuseful sought clarity on the AC's functionality, implying that it may need repairs to ensure performance, especially since the vehicle would be taken to Arizona where AC effectiveness is crucial.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @FirstClassExotics emphasizes that the vehicle is well-kept, with beautiful paint and a clean condition despite its high mileage. They offer a guarantee that the car maintains its integrity under various conditions, suggesting confidence in its overall presentation. This reassurance could facilitate buyer confidence regarding the vehicle's cosmetic appearance.
Neutral: @sbmaine raises a question regarding the absence of Distronic cruise control in the description, to which @FirstClassExotics confirms that it indeed works. Additionally, @SirMercsALot remarks on the dark photos provided, indicating a need for better visibility to assess the vehicle's condition. While questions about its mileage and potential wear are raised, there is acknowledgment of the number of pictures available, providing some information to potential buyers.
Negative: @SirMercsALot expresses skepticism about the vehicle's condition, pointing out the lack of photos showcasing imperfections despite the extensive number of images. They note that with 100k miles, it is hard to believe there are no chips or scratches present. In a similar vein, @mrillo requests explicit photos of wear and tear for further transparency, indicating concern over hidden issues that might not be adequately showcased in the provided images.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a general appreciation for the vehicle, particularly highlighted by @rightcoast21 who noted it as a great-looking SE7, expressing interest and curiosity about the car's condition. @Diron05 (The Seller) has been responsive to inquiries, offering insights regarding previous ownership and mechanical condition, stating that there were no warning lights lit on the dashboard and inviting further inspection or questioning. The engagement from commenters like @hockey73 indicates that there are serious bidders interested, implying that the vehicle has perceived value.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @oklahomajones and @gauldingr, have asked specific questions about the vehicle’s features and condition. @Diron05 (The Seller) has been proactive in addressing queries, including detailing the modifications he made and clarifying uncertainties about the vehicle’s history. Commenters like @shatterbrained and @rightcoast21 have also contributed to the conversation, seeking and providing additional information that could inform potential buyers.
Negative: There appears to be some concern regarding the vehicle’s condition, particularly from @gauldingr, who pointed out the absence of photos of the Hood Insulator Pad and noted its apparent damage in the Cold Start Video. Comments from bidders like @hockey73 express frustration over previous bidding dynamics, where a prior buyer backed out, complicating their purchasing plans. Additionally, there are remarks about the perceived high cost of transportation quoted by @gauldingr, which may deter some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle, with @smitty122 specifically praising the detailed startup video, calling it a beautiful MGA. @Turbogator (The Seller) provided clarifications that seem to satisfy some concerns regarding the vehicle's specifications, and several users concurred with the assessment that despite minor discrepancies, the car is still desirable. @Mabcars noted that despite some confusion about the year of the vehicle, the numbers generally point to a 1960 model, which could be an appealing factor to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments focused on technical specifics and clarifications regarding the car's identity, with @EmGeeEh bringing up questions about chassis numbers and VIN discrepancies, suggesting the need for clarification on the vehicle's history. @Turbogator (The Seller) responded to questions about the VIN, explaining how discrepancies could occur due to manufacturing practices of the time. Many commenters were interested in understanding details like the presence of a heater and inconsistencies in component identification, which are relatively common in classic car discussions.
Negative: However, some issues were raised about the condition of the vehicle. Reports from @P30 mentioned apparent frame repairs that could indicate previous damage, which might concern prospective buyers. Additionally, @v-tail11 pointed out potential issues with assembly and maintenance, specifically highlighting concerns about the nylock nuts on moving parts becoming loose over time. These elements may impact buyers' perceptions of the vehicle's overall condition and reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments reflecting positively on the vehicle emphasize its condition, history, and desirability. @MelHPAS, the seller, highlighted that this 1993 Dodge Power Ram W350 is a special model equipped with all the desired options and has undergone recent professional repainting. @dstone4320 praised @MelHPAS for integrity and honesty in the transaction, and several others expressed excitement about the truck's aesthetic appeal and performance. @FreddyandJack noted that after examining various first-gen trucks, those from @MelHPAS are the best, solidifying confidence in the vehicle’s quality. Overall, the consensus is that the truck stands out as a beautiful specimen with timeless styling.
Neutral: Some comments provide general information without strong opinions either way. @derekasmith0 remarked on the overall attractiveness of the W350, while others, like @Smogger, inquired about the originality of the bumpers. @garrettbclark06 asked whether it would be possible to inspect the truck before the auction's conclusion, showcasing an interest in the vehicle while maintaining a neutral stance. @NBoost's comment suggested that potential buyers should look at the truck in person unless purchasing from @MelHPAS, which further indicates a reasonable level of caution typical in auction scenarios.
Negative: A few comments reflected concerns or reservations about the vehicle. @BamRam expressed hesitance over the apparent presence of an air freshener, questioning if the previous owner was a smoker. Such observations hint at potential hidden odors that could affect the vehicle's appeal. While no major negative comments were made about the truck's overall quality, these concerns suggest that prospective buyers might want to inspect the truck physically to alleviate worries regarding its prior use. Overall, while there was limited negativity, these comments indicate a cautious approach to purchasing such a vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @CoopCity emphasizes the term "survivor" for this vehicle, recognizing its pristine condition and long-term ownership, suggesting a significant future appreciation for such models. @danden appreciates the nice paint color, while @Raven_734 admires the vehicle's unmodified condition and expresses a desire for a similar car. @dobie0791 compliments the car's super clean nature, underscoring its low mileage and original state. @TTW99 (The Seller) confirms the car is in excellent condition, stating that the A/C is operational and noting the vehicle's careful maintenance.
Neutral: @TTW99 (The Seller) discusses the car's aftermarket wheels and their impact on performance, maintaining that the original BBS wheels enhance its aesthetic value. The seller responds to queries regarding minor dents and the lack of repainting, assuring it remains in its untouched state. @brat123456 and @Chene91 both raise inquiries about minor imperfections, with @Youngtimerclassics arguing against the necessity of a compression test due to the car's original status. The seller confirms the tires are original but highlights their importance from a preservation standpoint.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the car's aging components, with @Sydthewhitedog advising immediate timing belt replacement given the 20 years since its last change, despite @TTW99 (The Seller) stating it has been dealer maintained without recommendation for such action. The seller balances these concerns by outlining the vehicle's usage patterns, stating it has not been driven in harsh conditions. @coinbk reflects on the vehicle's desirability while hinting at personal financial constraints, indicating potential hesitance among interested buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @traveler_1701 appreciates the unique color of the vehicle, acknowledging its appeal as a subjective choice. @DocMGL comments on the car having good structural integrity and believes it could be easily restored, while @Robbieismybroker (The Seller) expresses gratitude for the comments and engagement from potential buyers. @Powerflow6 humorously contemplates the benefits of the car's green color, highlighting its suitability for designated parking, which adds a lighthearted touch to the discussion.
Neutral: @Robbieismybroker (The Seller) provides insightful information regarding the vehicle's performance at altitude, clarifying that adjustments may be necessary if the car is moved to sea level. They also respond to inquiries about the car's condition, sharing their personal history with the vehicle and addressing technical questions about the carburetor and floor pan. Additional details, such as photographs of the car being lifted, are mentioned in the conversation, indicating a willingness to provide transparency to interested buyers.
Negative: @Collins4A critiques the current paint job, labeling it as unattractive, although they acknowledge that the original color was appealing. @RCP raises concerns over the structural integrity of the rear floor pan, questioning whether it is the original material or a replacement. The overall sentiment suggests that while there are some positive attributes to the vehicle, there are notable issues regarding its color and structural components that need further examination.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Fasting mentions his eagerness to find a new owner for the bike, highlighting that it has been well-maintained with low mileage of around 28K. He describes the careful cafe modifications made in 2011, ensuring that it could be reverted to its original condition if desired. Additionally, the extensive work done on the bike, including the freshening of the engine, rebuilding of the carbs, and installation of new tires, showcases the effort put into preserving its performance and aesthetics. @Slam105 appreciates the overall appearance of the bike and acknowledges the quality of the modifications, indicating that despite the potential dissent from purists, they are relatively conservative and enhance the bike's sound.
Neutral: Both @Fasting and @Slam105 discuss the modifications made to the bike, with the latter noting that there will likely be a healthy debate among enthusiasts about these changes. While @Slam105 finds the mods to be well-executed and favorable, he also recognizes that opinions may vary regarding specific elements like wrapped headers. @fast_fred shares a personal experience with a shift kit on his own motorcycle, which adds another layer to the conversation about modifications, suggesting that they can improve the riding experience.
Negative: While the modifications are generally received positively, there is an acknowledgment from @Slam105 that some 'purist' enthusiasts might disapprove of the alterations made to the BMW. Additionally, @Fasting points out a slight blemish on the fuel tank near the fuel cap, which is a potential concern for buyers looking for a flawless finish. This blemish, as mentioned, is visible in the provided gallery, introducing a small downside to an otherwise well-cared-for vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm for the dune buggy, describing it as a cool piece of history and a perfect vehicle for fun events like Burning Man. @57charlie highlighted the joy of owning a dune buggy and noted its historical significance. Similarly, @sanuk and @HankU discussed how the buggy would serve as a fantastic addition to their Burning Man experience, with @HankU revealing his excitement about its potential uses and its aesthetic appeal, especially during a photoshoot. Overall, there's a prevalent admiration for the buggy's unique design and its nostalgic connection to the past.
Neutral: Many inquiries were made regarding the buggy's features, particularly the seating and steering wheel position which seemed to raise some questions among potential buyers. @Jrbug53 noted the steering wheel's height, while @buttesilverbow remarked on the typical low seating position of dune buggy shells. @limegreen396 asked about the vehicle's paint and whether it was the original gel coat. @HankU responded to these questions promptly, adding insights about modifications and the vehicle's condition, including minor repairs on the floorboard and the original gel coat with a clear finish for preservation.
Negative: While most comments were positive or neutral, there were some mentions of aspects that might not appeal to all buyers. @HankU mentioned that some people do not favor the quad headlights but noted they are easily replaceable with round ones. However, there wasn't any strong criticism in the comments; rather, they reflected a more personal opinion regarding preferences in design choices. Thus, while there were preferences expressed that could be construed as negative, they were mild and easily addressed by the seller.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @cpa713 describes the car as "absolutely stunning," showing strong appreciation for its aesthetics. @torrpedo also comments on its beauty, stating it is one of their favorite Honda products, while @Craven expresses how much they love the G1 Legend Coupe, particularly praising this particular vehicle. @cleandmc adds to the applause, noting the appealing color combination and highlights unique features of the car that enhance its desirability. @idravemine fondly looks back at their experiences with the Legend, calling it a fantastic vehicle and expressing regret for not keeping it.
Neutral: Several comments clarify details about the vehicle's features and history. @KevinGivens (The Seller) mentions that they do not have timing belt service records and provides background on how the car has been stored meticulously. @thevintagehondaguy outlines the additional features that came with the LS model, while @QandnotU raises questions about the steering wheel cover. @stevec1456 offers a straightforward observation regarding the anti-lock brake light, suggesting it might be an easy fix related to brake fluid levels. @cleandmc gives practical advice on checking the trunk release and antenna issues, emphasizing the originality of many of the car's features.
Negative: @Stepside4x4 inquires about mouse damage, which raises concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @cleandmc shares insights about the likelihood of ABS failure based on experiences with similar vehicles, noting that this is a common issue. They also recommend disabling the ABS system to avoid dash lights and highlight the potential drawbacks related to it. These comments suggest a cautious view towards the vehicle's maintenance and parts longevity, which may deter some prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its stunning color, Orient Blue. @mulefan100 passionately stated their love for the car, and @Cornbread praised the car’s history and the seller's expertise, dreaming of adding it to their collection. @CaptainPicard echoed this sentiment, noting the perfect color combination and expressing gratitude that it couldn't be registered in CA to avoid personal conflict. @PAEnglish11 and @TampaGarage also complimented the car’s beauty and presentation, with @mario_L noting how the color pops in sunlight, emphasizing its aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @aleccartio, provided detailed responses to questions about the vehicle, including information about its restoration and specifications such as the absence of a sunroof. They communicated openly, addressing potential concerns about the door seals and clarifying the car’s registration status in different states, specifically noting California's restrictions. Additionally, @zain59 and @RSDlugosJr raised questions regarding the European vs. American valuation and maintenance queries, with @aleccartio providing informative insights.
Negative: Some criticisms were directed towards the vehicle, particularly concerning minor details that have not been addressed during restoration. @pugliamom pointed out that the rubber seals on the door handles appeared worn and questioned whether they were overlooked. @RSDlugosJr also voiced concern about the practicality of replacing these seals at this stage. @underpronator inquired about the decision to pull the entire drivetrain despite low mileage, prompting a response from @aleccartio regarding the meticulous standards set by previous owners.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ASAdad remarked that the car is beautiful and seemed curious about the quick turnover in ownership, especially after recent servicing. @Scobee1210 praised the engine's condition, suggesting it was so clean one could eat off it, and expressed a fondness for the turbine wheels. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) emphasized the car's immaculate condition, stating it was likely the nicest SL55 listed in a while. They noted how the previous owner had trusted their mechanic to make the vehicle perfect, indicating a high level of care and maintenance.
Neutral: @no.radar provided a light-hearted comment noting the car's quick sales, suggesting there is demand for such vehicles. @Flashpix complemented the car's appearance in silver and expressed a preference for turbine wheels while inquiring about the ABC system's service history, indicating a concern typical for older vehicles. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) described how the car was recently serviced, with all lines inspected and no concerns noted, reinforcing the vehicle's pristine condition.
Negative: Although there were no outright negative comments, @Flashpix did raise a valid question about the maintenance of the ABC system, which can be an expensive repair on older models. This concern hints at potential issues for prospective buyers given the age of the vehicle, even though @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) reassured that the car had undergone thorough inspections and necessary services.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dean_Laumbach (The Seller) describes this vehicle as exceptional, highlighting its remarkable cleanliness and mechanical state after extensive work. He notes that the current owner has invested heavily in its maintenance, clearly demonstrating it has been meticulously cared for with an open checkbook approach. @Derek_Platt94 adds to this by stating their shop has devoted years of service to the vehicle, affirming its performance and reliability. Multiple comments express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, with specific praise for the durable cloth seats that are noted to wear exceptionally well compared to leather.
Neutral: The comments reveal some ambiguity regarding the vehicle's history, particularly concerning its declared total loss in 2006. @Dean_Laumbach acknowledges the front bumper misalignment and details the minimal rust present, suggesting these are primarily cosmetic issues. @bbckfh and @U0NLYLV4N0W raise questions about the title status and insurability, indicating a cautious interest among potential buyers. The observations reflect a mix of appreciation for the vehicle along with the need for further clarification on some aspects before making a purchase decision.
Negative: Concerns around the vehicle's total loss history and minor body imperfections are prevalent. Commenters like @spartacus17 and @bbckfh express skepticism about the nature of the bumper damage and its connection to the vehicle's past. Although @Dean_Laumbach reassures potential buyers about the structural integrity, statements about the rust under the driver side door and the misaligned bumper may deter some buyers. Additionally, questions about the overall condition of certain components, such as the sunroof and whether any fluid leaks are present, arise, potentially causing hesitation for interested parties.
![]() |
2008 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring 40th Anniversary Edition 6-Speed
JM1FE173980215521
Lot 202475
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @Ycbmsma noted that the vehicle appears to be in very good condition despite missing the engine insulation. They mentioned that parts for restoration, like the OEM air box, are still available from Mazda, indicating that the car can be returned to its original state if desired. @Andyzulul (The Seller) highlighted their willingness to assist interested buyers in the US with the import process, creating an opportunity for potential purchasers outside of Canada.
Neutral: @halmar asked whether the car is old enough to cross into the US without incurring significant expenses, reflecting concerns about regulations and costs associated with cross-border purchases. @Frederal inquired about the vehicle's maintenance history and original service records, seeking transparency regarding the car's upkeep, while @W4llace emphasized the importance of a rotary compression test to provide potential buyers with reliable insight into engine health.
Negative: @CarGuy2729 expressed concerns about the rust present underneath the vehicle, suggesting it would diminish its value, especially considering the complexities related to importing it into the US. @Frederal raised questions about rust exposure and the potential for corrosion due to salty road conditions, which could impact the car's integrity over time. @W4llace and others highlighted the lack of a compression test as a critical gap in the sale, noting that without this information, potential buyers might hesitate to place bids, thus capping the sale price.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received great praise from commenters for its overall condition and the meticulous care taken by the seller, @Luvjeeps. @Magrz mentioned knowing the owner and trusting that the Jeep is well cared for, potentially even better than depicted in photos. The seller has claimed the Jeep has only 8,903 miles on it, and that the oil was changed recently, which adds to the appeal for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about the vehicle's original features, including the tires and whether it has a soft top. @JackSweny asked if the tires were original, while @Leiniesbuddy and @highspeedwithalottadrag also noted the absence of a soft top. The seller confirmed that this Jeep has never been driven in winter conditions and that the top has never been removed, contributing to its preserved state.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about potential leaks, particularly by @highspeedwithalottadrag, who noted what appeared to be dripping under the engine. @MktPrice1972 also questioned if any fluids had been changed over the vehicle's life. @Luvjeeps firmly addressed these concerns, assuring that there are no drips and that any issues were due to recent rain during the photo shoot, indicating a degree of skepticism towards the vehicle's reported condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the impressive engine performance and aesthetics of the vehicle, with @Mouse51 calling attention to its powerful motor, while @CobraVic11 reminisces about the thrill of Gassers in drag racing. @ChargeRTBob admires the quality and planning evident in the vehicle's build, describing it as a 'super sano' pickup, and @imanut2 appreciates its embodiment of the classic Gasser days wrapped into a street-legal package. Many commentors express enthusiasm for its high-performance features, such as the Arias heads and the candy apple red paint, which @Valiantjim and others note is breathtaking.
Neutral: The seller, @GeorgeLyons, engages positively with potential buyers, offering to provide further information and updates about the auction status. He shares detailed insights regarding the vehicle's history, noting it belonged to a friend who was passionate about cars, and encourages questions from interested parties. Various users show interest in technical details of the car, such as asking about horsepower and components while also sharing their thoughts on the history and engineering evident in the vehicle, with @FAO expressing how well-built the machine is.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about aspects of the vehicle, such as the steep 4.33 gear ratio mentioned by @imanut2 and @Valiantjim, which might imply limited highway driving capabilities. Others, like @THEDOGKEEPER, express surprise at the vehicle's price, questioning why it hasn't garnered more interest. The comment from @larson3912 is rather nebulous, simply stating 'cool' without a detailed elaboration, and speaks to a sense of apprehension regarding the car's practicality for some prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle receives praise for its appearance and functionality, with @vincepmayne complimenting the custom wheel choice that enhances its look. Additionally, @majorhavoc finds the rig impressive, while @hangryharry appreciates the seller's thorough responses, specifically noting that all systems function correctly as designed. Positive engagement from the seller, @hgpmatt67BAT, contributes to a sense of community and responsiveness, adding to the positive impressions of the vehicle and the auction process.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around practical inquiries about the vehicle's specifications. @carbonGracie asks about the towing capacity, and @chrisrob inquires about sleeping arrangements in the vehicle. The seller, @hgpmatt67BAT, clarifies that the towing capacity is 5000lbs and that the vehicle can comfortably sleep three people. @cqlink and @freemantim raise questions regarding the warranty and passenger capacity, respectively, which are promptly answered.
Negative: There are concerns regarding the vehicle's emissions and potential smog regulations, raised primarily by @hangryharry. While the seller assures that no emissions modifications have been made and that the vehicle passed smog tests previously, there is still lingering uncertainty on this topic reflected in multiple questions. Additionally, @mkrachun points out confusion about the auction's reserve status, showcasing a potential area of misunderstanding in the listing process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Pete000 appreciates the vehicle's nice stance, indicating an appealing design. @ssolano6995 (The Seller) has engaged positively with potential buyers, offering to show the car and providing service records and photos as requested. The car has received compliments on its condition and the integrity of its restoration work, reflecting care in its maintenance.
Neutral: Comments from @DougBaughman inquire about the dates of important vehicle records, indicating a desire for transparency in the vehicle’s maintenance history. @Segura911 and @MCShack discuss the nature of bidding in auctions related to this vehicle, suggesting a variability in how different auctions operate, which is common in the automotive market. Car enthusiasts, including @MCShack, reflect on their past experiences with similar vehicles and convey observations around interior materials and performance.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @DougBaughman regarding the absence of a date on the receipt, which may affect trust in the documentation provided. @chaz2000 questioned the typical auction bidding strategy, implying a skepticism towards the auction’s pricing strategy. Additionally, comments about the carpet color suggest it is not well-received by everyone, with some believing a different color choice would be more appealing, while @ssolano6995 defensively clarified that the carpet is original and protected.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the vehicle's low mileage and excellent condition, with @MichaelB stating it is a prime example of a Cayman S that is ready to please buyers. @JoeCar58 agrees, describing it as gorgeous and well-equipped, predicting a bidding war for the car. Other commenters, like @Werkstatt, echo @MichaelB's praises, noting both the quality of the car and the seller's professionalism. The proactive measure of posting a borescope inspection has also garnered positive feedback, with @Spokayman mentioning the appeal of this transparency regarding the car's condition.
Neutral: Several commenters have expressed interest and asked for additional details regarding the vehicle. @Quackbury and @JoeCar58 have requested a DME report, window sticker, and tire date codes, showing their proactive approach to gathering information before bidding. @Gossir, too, inquires about maintenance invoices and specifics, highlighting an engaged and informed bidding community that seeks comprehensive data to make purchasing decisions. @MichaelB assures them that these details will be provided, maintaining an open line for communication.
Negative: While the overall sentiment is positive, there are minor criticisms. @JoeCar58 mentions that some performance upgrades could enhance the Cayman S, indicating room for improvement. Additionally, @Spokayman suggested changing the orange side markers for clear ones, showing a preference for aesthetic upgrades. @Gossir's questions about keys and the mysterious round object in the footwell reflect a desire for thorough clarity, suggesting that there are details some potential buyers feel need further explanation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @NortEdward describes the vehicle as a "great wagon," indicating a positive first impression. @wem5310 gives kudos to the seller for being transparent about the car's codes, suggesting a level of trustworthiness in the sale. Furthermore, @RenownUSA expresses enthusiasm about the vehicle's performance with the comment about wanting all the power going to the rear wheels, indicating excitement for its capabilities.
Neutral: There were several inquiries about the modifications and the car's features. @wcoucheron expresses curiosity regarding the RWD conversion, while @Barrafstbck inquires about the P0121, P0171, and P0174 codes, questioning the vehicle's readiness for a long drive. Additionally, @TanDan and @M2noa3 ask for clarification on the engine's mileage and the wheels being sold with the car, reflecting a desire for detailed information.
Negative: On the downside, concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's modification choices and potential issues. @RenownUSA mentions the unusual choice of a black roof/hood wrap alongside questions about the car's paint condition and a potential need for repainting those areas. @Cryoval similarly inquires about the longevity of the wrap, suggesting it may not be optimal. There are also concerns raised by @RenownUSA regarding the trouble codes, hinting at possible engine-related problems that could impact the vehicle's reliability.
![]() |




















































































































































