Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: The 1955 Mercedes-Benz 300SL Gullwing is receiving high praise from various commentators who highlight its stunning design and historical significance. @Dollycat3 refers to it as 'absolutely wonderful' and mentions the car's 'stellar provenance.' Other users describe it as 'a piece of art' and 'one of the finest-looking cars ever to hit the road,' with @Espanolie calling it 'stunning timeless beauty' and @bobski mentioning its cleaner underside than his house. Commenters appreciate the thorough presentation by @1600veloce, the seller, who showcases the vehicle with an impressive array of images and videos, ensuring potential buyers have a complete understanding of the car's features and quality.
Neutral: Several commenters express neutral sentiments by discussing the vehicle's attributes and sharing experiences related to the 300SL models. @Frank_Barrett poses a question about the inclusion of the original seaworthy shipping crate, illustrating some curiosity about the details of the auction. Others, like @Gloccamora and @who1, engage in light banter and inquiries regarding finding other 300SL models, showcasing a community of enthusiasts connecting over shared interests. @pricesensitive shares his past experiences with owning similar vehicles and highlights the importance of ensuring they reach proper operating temperatures, contributing to the conversation without strong judgment either way.
Negative: A small number of comments reflect a critical view, primarily focused on the subjective nature of beauty in automotive design. @TheOMDude suggests that the 300SL, while deserving of admiration, may not hold the title of 'most beautiful car in history' and references other contenders. @bproosow, while expressing an interest in viewing the auction, openly states he's out if the shipping crate is not included, indicating a lack of seriousness about purchasing. Additionally, @Redbaron95 raises doubts about the general appreciation of the Gullwing among average viewers, and @pricesensitive interjects some technical concerns related to oil temperature management in such classic cars.
 |
Exomod Concepts 2022 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat Redeye C68 Carbon
2C3CDZL99NH159042
Lot 202367
Dealer
 |
Positive: @Fordsarecool expresses admiration for the car, calling it "amazing". @Piros1 appreciates its retro Dodge Charger design despite not being a MOPAR fan. Seller @fcort7 describes the vehicle as a unique piece of art with a full carbon fiber body and an exposed carbon weave, claiming it is the only one of its kind. Enthusiasts like @bzbaz63 and @MARKWHO highlight the car's beauty and unique design, while @MikeMagil and @tista echo similar excitement, the latter also complimenting the plush upholstery. Overall, the car is seen as exceptional, with several commenters praising its quality, design, and modern performance.
Neutral: Various comments touch on the car's specifications and auction details. @CPT_5LOW notes that the nine-day auction duration is due to its premium classification, while @lincolnsandcaddies expresses surprise at the length of the auction. The seller clarifies that the car is titled as a 2022 Dodge Challenger while still maintaining the essence of a classic Charger. Several commenters inquire about the car's emissions compliance, with @fcort7 confirming that it will pass California emissions regulations. The mention of conversion and modifications confirms the blend of classic aesthetic with modern engineering.
Negative: Some commenters have expressed skepticism about the need for vehicle transformations, with @Jerbes1928 criticizing the departure from the original Charger design, believing original bodied cars were more beautiful. @Acorn19 states a preference for an actual Charger over the modified versions, while others share mixed feelings about the extent of alterations made to the vehicle. @Caymanorcarrera and @Blewbyyou question the car's value and emissions compliance, suggesting concerns regarding its legitimacy and practicality for typical use.
|
 |
Positive: @Bradp: Kudos for being NR on this example. Good example for someone who wants to park in the garage and drive the hell out of a lambo with a moderate cost to experience ratio. @MindTrain: The car looks great! Who would ever know. Hell Lambos and Ferraris get totaled for the darndest things anyway because of the high cost of spares. @whynotbuy: Serious props to seller for NR salvage title. I very much wish you the best of luck, commenters gave you good direction for what could have added some value but I expect you know what's going on here.
Neutral: @Kauai: This is a typical Ebay salvage listing that I rarely see here on BAT. It will be good to see how the bidding goes on this with a NR. @Rgitlestad (The Seller): Yes, runs and drives great! Holds temp. @TAjefe: Thank you!
Negative: @dommarconi: Passenger door alignment seems to be off from the first video? Is this a repaired car? @Josephs1969: The Airbags on the seats are missing correct? @Handsofstone: Some colors are off front drivers side fender and driver's door look off to me and definitely looks like the passenger side door is not gapped correctly. @Longforlineup: But you're right it's the seller's business, just gonna cost him $10-30k as bidders will assume the worst.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the nostalgia and charm of the vehicle. @Hoppy18 describes it as a perfect time capsule for a 'firefighter', while @JaST reminisces about a similar car from high school that brought back fond memories. @CarFoolLane appreciates the vehicle's aesthetic, noting how it could easily fit into a 1970 used car lot. @stugottz expresses empathy for @bobwoz (The Seller) regarding the emotional attachment involved in selling such a long-held car, wishing them good luck with the auction.
Neutral: Several commenters seek clarification and additional information about the vehicle's condition and features. @yjBen inquires about the Buck tag and missing parts of the air conditioning system, while @pattern76 asks about pictures of the bodywork and potential water leaks. @coffeeholick_motorsports points out the unknown mileage on the rolled odometer and the recent rebuild at low mileage, suggesting curiosity about the vehicle's current state. @ljelley467 mentions the steering wheel being misaligned and questions the alignment process, indicating some concern but no strong negativity.
Negative: Criticism arises regarding the vehicle's condition and missing components. @ljelley467 notes the steering wheel is off-center, implying a lack of proper alignment, while also questioning the status of the air conditioning system. @phavriluk asks about basic functionalities like the heater and wipers, indicating they might be overlooked. @Desmotwin raises concerns about whether the floor panels were replaced during repairs, reflecting a level of skepticism about the quality of the restorations. Overall, while there are positive aspects highlighted, there's a noticeable focus on potential shortcomings.
|
 |
Positive: @curiousoffice shares a positive experience with the seller, asserting that a vehicle purchased previously was better than described, suggesting that the seller maintains high standards. @Static50 also expresses admiration for the car's interior color, noting that it alters his previous perceptions of blue interiors from the 70s. Additionally, @morgangomez compliments the stunning color combination of the vehicle, while @bigmike55 appreciates how beautifully the car is presented.
Neutral: @UDrive (The Seller) engages with potential buyers, assuring them that the ABC suspension is functioning properly and providing transparency about the vehicle's condition. They emphasize that the Vario top should be fully serviced due to the car's age, highlighting a proactive approach to maintenance. The seller also welcomes pre-purchase inspections, reinforcing a sense of trustworthiness.
Negative: @diamondsforever raises concerns regarding the ABC suspension and inquires about any rust on the vehicle. Despite getting reassurance from the seller that there is no rust and that the suspension functions properly, the initial question indicates some hesitancy among potential buyers regarding the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors express generally positive sentiments about the truck, with @Mpls66 highlighting it as a 'nice truck.' @dldidde (The Seller) engages positively by responding with appreciation, saying 'Thanks!!!' which indicates a good rapport between the Seller and potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries about specific features of the vehicle were made. @Bigfitter asked for pictures of the floor pans, and @Whitey69 wanted clarification on the lines on the rear end. @dldidde (The Seller) addressed these inquiries by confirming that the tailgate opens and explaining that the lines are related to the emergency brake cables that are not hooked up. This exchange suggests that the vehicle has various features and details that potential buyers are interested in knowing more about.
Negative: One comment expressed a wish for a larger engine from @moneybags, indicating some dissatisfaction with the current engine size. However, @dldidde (The Seller) did not address this concern directly, which could imply that there are some limitations or aspects of the vehicle that do not meet all buyers' expectations.
|
 |
Positive: @oldreliable expressed delight in discovering the car's quick handling and power, finding it enjoyable to drive on curvy roads. He praised the comfort of the seats, indicating that there was ample space for someone of his height. @LuvBritCars shared that the Roadster S is their favorite MINI, highlighting its good power, excellent handling, and practicality with seating and trunk space. @RoadsterR59 reminisced about their own Roadster S, calling it the most fun car they've driven and encouraging others to buy this one, promising they wouldn't regret it.
Neutral: @enthusiastic_enthusiast, the seller, provided detailed information on the car's condition, including clarifications on the brakes and tire tread depth. They mentioned that the car is being listed on consignment and shared plans for an overview video, engaging with potential buyers to answer any questions. Additionally, other users sought clarification on various maintenance items, including air conditioning and recent service history, showcasing an active interest in understanding the vehicle thoroughly.
Negative: @squirrellymerley questioned the short ownership period of the current owner, implying potential concerns. @Gallahad noted that while the car looked good, the 2017 tire date codes indicated that new tires might be required for performance driving, not just casual outings. @Dealbw highlighted concerns about service records, questioning whether specific maintenance was performed and asking for battery age and receipts, indicating a desire for reassurance on the vehicle's upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Ferrari 330 GTC, highlighting its beauty and significance as a classic car. @Bill_Noon referred to it as 'the stuff of dreams' and @Dollycat3 called it 'absolutely beautiful'. @2112 noted it as one of the nicest project cars seen, while @CarCrzyTom pointed out that the car is in better condition than many operational models, suggesting a positive outlook for its restoration. @mak1957 mentioned its rarity and potential as a good opportunity for re-commissioning, emphasizing its original features and low mileage, which many view as a solid foundation for restoration.
Neutral: Several commentators engaged in discussions concerning the car's operational state and restoration potential. @Ashman528 suggested that with proper maintenance, the vehicle could be back on the road. @MaranelloBoy and others raised questions about the conditions of the car's storage and whether essential maintenance had been performed. @DSFM2005, the seller, reinforced the car's solid condition and original features, hinting at the opportunity for both refurbishment and enjoyment as-is. Overall, there is a consensus that while the car requires work, it holds substantial potential, although opinions vary on the nature and extent of restoration needed.
Negative: Some users expressed skepticism regarding the car's overall condition and the seller's claims about a 'straightforward' refurbishment. @Mike831 and @MercuryKG7H questioned the feasibility of getting the car running efficiently without substantial investment, while @Iscopem voiced a critical perspective on the car's current state, referring to it as a 'very tired, worn out old lady'. @Bug36T57 was curious about the car's interior color combinations, implying a lack of thoroughness in restoration. There are indications that potential buyers might face hidden issues, particularly regarding the engine and necessary repairs, leading to a feeling of uncertainty surrounding the auction.
|
 |
Positive: The comments express admiration for the 1955 Jaguar XK140 MC Roadster, highlighting its beautiful design and impressive specifications. @Bordeaux describes it as 'perfect,' noting its paint, trim, engine, and transmission, while @H2wk3ye reminisces about their past ownership of a similar model, expressing a desire to purchase this stunning example. @jerichomtn emphasizes the car's solid, rust-free California background and deems it a guaranteed appreciating asset in a market of high-priced new vehicles. The seller @hymanltd also received praise for the high-quality restoration and craftsmanship demonstrated in the vehicle, with commenters showing excitement over the included videos showcasing its performance and condition.
Neutral: Several comments touch on technical points regarding the vehicle without strong sentiments. @Rtryan raises an inquiry about the replacement engine, prompting an informative response from @hymanltd, who explains the history behind the current engine number. Additionally, @Pkglassman and @Bug36T57 discuss the functionality of the turn signals, providing helpful insights about their operation. There is also a constructive critique regarding the photos, with @Aspenracer suggesting that the indoor images may not effectively represent the car's color, which some believe is better captured in the outdoor images. Overall, the discussion reflects a balanced mix of appreciation and requests for clarification on specifications.
Negative: A few comments express concerns about the vehicle, particularly regarding its authenticity and certain imperfections. @Rtryan questions the story behind the replacement engine and id tag, which has created some skepticism about the car's originality. @tomjack notes a peculiar statement in the Production Certificate that highlights a non-original component, indicating some lack of transparency. This was echoed by @davidxk, who provided clarity on the documentation process but implied the potential for confusion in distinguishing original parts. Furthermore, @H2wk3ye points out minor cosmetic issues related to the clock and temperature gauge, reflecting that while the car is lovely, it is not free from needed repairs.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, noting that it is a beautiful and well-kept Corvette. @Messierp123 highlights the desirability of the Z07 6-speed car, while @Beans_Bacon adds that this particular car is stunning and many would dream of owning it. Additionally, @C4geek appreciates the design of the car, emphasizing the sleek profile, and @frankjhouser (The Seller) emphasizes the unique nature of this particular C4 Corvette, noting its low mileage and original components, positioning it as a potential collector's item. The consensus among several enthusiasts indicates they see it as a valuable and cherished vehicle.
Neutral: There are some inquiries about the condition and specification details of the vehicle, which reflects a balanced interest among potential buyers. @ChonM questions whether there is a lien on the vehicle as indicated by CarFax, to which @frankjhouser (The Seller) responds, clarifying that Bring A Trailer has confirmed there is no lien. Discussions introduced by @TexasMule and @rgilson7 revolve around the wear on the driver's seat, with both expressing curiosity about the factors influencing it, such as the leather's nature and question surrounding the vehicle's interior equipment. Additionally, both @Volvo142Turbo and @gwarcuri raise questions regarding emissions compliance and the vehicle's suitability for specific states, suggesting that prospective buyers need to consider local regulations.
Negative: Conversely, several comments raise concerns regarding potential issues that could affect interest in the vehicle. @TexasMule points out the discrepancies in the condition of the driver's seat, implying that it appears to be more worn than expected given the low mileage. @Drumlin brings up the water pump replacement and its potential effects on the Optispark system, highlighting the significance of such maintenance history in assessing the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @gwarcuri and @slammin discuss regulatory concerns for buyers in California and other states, suggesting that the car may not be suitable for all buyers due to emission compliance, which could deter some from pursuing it. Overall, while the comments reflect admiration for the car, these concerns introduce caution among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The 2010 Range Rover Supercharged is well-maintained, with @E_N (The Seller) investing significant time and money into repairs and cosmetic enhancements. The seller highlights that the vehicle has been garaged for its life and has only undergone service at a reputable Land Rover dealer. Details about maintenance include a major timing chain repair and numerous cosmetic upgrades with OEM parts that have returned the vehicle to like-new condition, indicating a high level of care during its ownership. The most recent service included an oil change and repairing the passenger-side axel boot, ensuring the vehicle is in good working order for its next owner.
Neutral: Several commenters express interest in the vehicle, with @BBK seeking clarification about ownership and whether it originally belonged to the seller's parents. @ddelia18 and @leroyholt34 ask detailed technical questions regarding the vehicle's condition post-collision repair, indicating a desire for transparency about its history. @RobbieRange inquires about potentially viewing the car in person or via FaceTime, which shows a proactive approach from interested buyers. There are also comments regarding the extent of repairs and the availability of original parts, reflecting a common curiosity about the vehicle’s prior damage and repairs.
Negative: Some concerns arise from commenters like @leroyholt34, who requests visual documentation of the repair work executed by Caliber to verify the extent of the previous damage, implying they need reassurance that the accident was indeed minor. Similarly, @ddelia18's inquiries regarding the functions of specific parts and systems, such as the surround cameras and air suspension, indicate potential doubts about the vehicle's current operational status. Additionally, @volvo268 questions the seller about the lack of in-person inspections, hinting at buyer hesitance due to the auction format limiting opportunities for thorough evaluation before bidding.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has sparked a wave of nostalgia, with @jvan20p reminiscing about their own experiences with a Honda 50 from 1965, highlighting its top speed of 45 mph and impressive fuel efficiency of over 50 mpg. @Babyp noted that the Honda Cub is the highest-selling motor vehicle of all time, showcasing its iconic status. Additionally, @RobBob911 praised the bike's ease of maintenance and its representation in various media, reinforcing its iconic status as a beloved collector's item that has been featured with families and other loads, underlining its practicality and charm as a classic motorcycle.
Neutral: Several users, including @Chedmardo and @RobBob911, provided clarifications on the model specifics, noting that the vehicle is a C102 due to its electric start feature, contrasting it with the kick-only C100. There's a consensus around the bike's somewhat limited power and subpar brakes, which are expected traits for such classic models. @PTFarmer inquired about the bike's top speed, suggesting a broader interest in its performance compared to the user's previous experience with a 50cc trail bike.
Negative: Comments on the bike did not shy away from addressing its shortcomings. @analogautosport cautionarily noted the sharp fixed buddy pegs, while @deltas69 shared a personal anecdote about the weak kickstarter shaft, recalling a mishap from 1968. @RobBob911 also mentioned the potential for the kickstart shafts to break if handled roughly, suggesting that the bike demands a gentle approach to operation. These comments reflect a concern for the bike's durability and practical issues that new owners might face.
|
 |
Positive: @Fireram16 mentioned that the Camaro is a nice looking car that should sell well. @funkaholik agreed, highlighting its understated appearance and good upgrades. @boaboyoz referred to it as a 'cool as a cucumber' specimen, and @bestcarsinc (The Seller) claimed that the car is in incredible shape with many notable features. @MartyKC appreciated the clean look of the Camaro, indicating that it had aftermarket parts that added value.
Neutral: @MartyKC raised a question about the transmission type, leading to a discussion about the shifter. Both @blackhawkguy and @MartyKC commented on the car's nostalgic feel and its engine options, while @ssterry speculated about the SS badge potentially being a Sport Super. The discussions reflected a mix of opinions on the vehicle's features without strong feelings either way.
Negative: @KevStang criticized the upside-down SS badge, advising the seller that such small details could affect auction outcomes. @MartyKC shared concerns that the listing might be misleading due to transmission details. Further, @Mr.Majestyk inquired about the lack of air conditioning and original radio functionality, highlighting some potential drawbacks to the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a "beautiful car" and "art in automotive form." @Ceeej noted its aesthetic appeal, comparing it to his past ownership of a similar model. @tintinmilou called it "incredible" and expressed newfound appreciation for Bentley's design, while @gscharnagl praised the unique color options, reflecting a sense of exclusivity and elegance. Commenters like @Boatymcboatface emphasized the car's value and collectability, further adding to the positive sentiment around its design and specifications.
Neutral: The seller, @1600veloce, provided a thorough description of the vehicle's condition and features, highlighting that it comes with three keys and all books. The seller also emphasized their commitment to quality by mentioning their detailing shop and the climate-controlled facility where vehicles are stored. A few commenters had practical questions, such as @SEAF's inquiry about any potential chips evident in the images, which the seller addressed directly. @EastCoastCarGuy shared his own experiences with the V8 variant of the Continental GT, expressing satisfaction with its performance and comfort.
Negative: Conversely, not all feedback was entirely positive. @SixteenVentiler mentioned a dislike for the large wheel size, suggesting a preference for more traditional dimensions, while reflecting on trends in vehicle design. This sentiment implies that despite the overall beauty, there are aspects of the contemporary styling that some find unappealing. Additionally, there was a hint of frustration from potential buyers like @fastcash21, who lamented their inability to purchase the vehicle due to financial constraints, indicating a sense of desire met with disappointment.
|
 |
Positive: @Myoldcut expressed admiration for the vehicle's shifter design, calling it truly amazing. @Barryward indicated that one would enjoy life more by owning the car, while @Middler89 described it as a wonderful cruiser. @Rivnut confirmed that the unique console was an optional feature for its time and noted the car's rare disc brake option. The seller, @enthusiastic_enthusiast, shared their enthusiasm for the Riv and invited potential buyers to get to know the vehicle better, emphasizing their commitment to providing a pleasant buying experience.
Neutral: @Craven acknowledged that while the car wasn't a Boat tail and not original, it still deserves appreciation as an upscale coupe from the 1960s. @Pettyfan43 expressed curiosity about the console shifter and its optional status while wishing the seller good luck. Several others, including @Jackz4, noted the extensive number of pictures provided in the auction listing. @enthusiastic_enthusiast mentioned upcoming videos to showcase the vehicle further, including details about the A/C and a cold start.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the car's condition, particularly rust issues. @Gtshelby427 noted under-hood and undercarriage rust that raised red flags about the vehicle's storage conditions. @siegelng echoed these concerns and sought clarification on the undercarriage condition. In response, @sohuntley, the owner, asserted that the rust was only surface-level, having been stored in a climate-controlled garage. @Baronvonbrutus questioned whether the overview video would positively or negatively impact the bidding process.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is receiving a lot of praise for its stunning color and originality. Commenters like @mortinson describe it as possibly the most original 280GE Cabrio they've seen in years. @ginger contributes by sharing the unique history and luxury aspects of this particular model, including its rare factory AC and its significance as Mercedes' first venture into the SUV market. The vehicle's high-quality craftsmanship and timeless appeal are echoed by @WAGroup (The Seller), who highlights its rarity and the feelings it invokes in both current and former owners, showing that it attracts attention and admiration.
Neutral: Many of the comments focus on the factual and historical aspects of the vehicle. @Tuneya inquires about its towing specifications, to which @WAGroup (The Seller) provides reference images. There's also discussion regarding the factory options available for this model, with @shervinator linking to the vehicle's data card. Questions about personal inspection by potential buyers, such as from @emmettlodge, demonstrate interest in the vehicle's physical presence and condition, while @ducttape seeks clarification on a handwritten note found in the brochure.
Negative: A couple of comments raise concerns, such as @hpark006 asking about a potential leak on the front passenger side, to which @WAGroup (The Seller) asserts that no leaks are present. Similarly, there was some confusion regarding the handwritten note found in the sale's brochure that needed clarification, adding a slight uncertainty to the discussion of the vehicle’s condition. Overall, however, these comments do not detract significantly from the vehicle's largely positive reception.
|
 |
Positive: @Frost praises the unique characteristics of Canadian versions of US cars, highlighting the distinctive gold badge from Benson Ford while expressing enthusiasm for the vehicle's potential appeal at car shows. Several commenters, such as @Dollycat3 and @Chrmnmau, share admiration for the beauty and rarity of the Meteor Country Sedan, noting its captivating color combination and historical provenance. @Dcmcc emphasizes the significance of its previous owner, Benson, and praises the car's originality and intact condition, adding to its charm.
Neutral: Comments from @ekmcmullen (The Seller) indicate a willingness to provide additional images and videos upon request, showcasing a responsive and engaging seller. @wetwillyskate and @Oldlady ask for more visual content, demonstrating an interest in fully understanding the vehicle's features before making a decision. @Chrmnmau mentions an upcoming car show that this vehicle would fit into, hinting at its potential to draw attention if showcased properly.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns, such as @Sparrownaut, who appreciates the V8 engine but mentions hesitations regarding the lack of air conditioning, which might limit their interest. Others like @GDO inquire about practical aspects such as the car's running condition, suggesting possible apprehensions about its reliability. The candid recollections of @Alfacharlie indicate nostalgia but also hint at a missed opportunity, providing a somewhat bittersweet reflection on the vehicle's past.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the 2008 Porsche Cayenne Turbo for its low mileage and excellent condition, especially noting it as a meticulously maintained example with a comprehensive service history from authorized Porsche dealerships in Japan. @Tnbusiness71, the seller, highlights that the car has no accident history, verified mileage, and has been serviced exclusively at Porsche dealerships, which potential buyers find reassuring. Other users, such as @Stuttgaurdian and @mcsleepy, express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic features and its desirability as a collector's item. Overall, there's enthusiasm about the Cayenne Turbo's well-preserved state and the trust in the seller's transparency during the auction.
Neutral: Some comments reflect inquiries about the vehicle's importability into the U.S., with @kzare raising concerns about its legal status in California and @BigMac44 asking about shipping arrangements to Ontario. @Tnbusiness71 addresses these queries thoroughly, emphasizing that the vehicle does not possess EPA compliance stickers and cannot be imported to the U.S. without federalization, advising interested buyers to consult registered importers. Additionally, a few users like @Knuckles-R-Busted share their personal curiosity about the Cayenne's reliability and express interest in further research before making decisions, indicating a common approach among potential buyers.
Negative: Conversely, there are negative sentiments regarding past experiences with the seller's service. @janaka shares a complaint about their own negative experience regarding a Bentley purchase, claiming the vehicle was left 'abandoned' and accusing the seller of poor customer service. This comment prompts responses from other users, such as @omi205, who express their decision to withdraw interest due to these allegations. Additionally, there are concerns about the response time of the seller and the clarity of communications, which @BigMac44 refers to as uncomfortable. These comments create unease among prospective buyers in light of the seller's past interactions with other clients.
|
 |
Positive: The auction for the 2022 TGD 17' Poling Skiff has generated positive enthusiasm among the community, showcasing its high-quality construction and thoughtful design. Commenters have praised the boat for its impressive features such as a clean layout, custom-built trailer, and a powerful Tohatsu 30-horsepower engine. @DrJacquesStrappe remarked on the attention to detail and effective use of space, while @kmartinusa highlighted the boat's excellent rigging and safety features, showing a general consensus on the boat's overall quality. Additionally, @Boatbum referred to it as a 'badass skinny water poling skiff,' suggesting it caters well to fishing enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several potential buyers expressed practical inquiries regarding the boat's features and usability, indicating their interest in its versatility. @hunterhoward787 and @Moenmatthewd both posed questions about the operation of the tiller while seated and possibilities for a trolling motor setup, which signifies thoughtful consideration for fishing needs. The seller @k2motorcars provided informative answers, clarifying that the tiller can be operated comfortably while sitting and that both a live well and a seat can be accommodated, demonstrating an openness to modifying the boat according to buyers' needs.
Negative: Concerns were raised around certain design aspects of the skiff that may not meet every user's preferences. For instance, @DrJacquesStrappe noted that the absence of a console might seem unusual, although @k2motorcars explained it was a design choice to maximize fishing space. Additionally, there were inquiries regarding safety features, such as the absence of a visible kill-switch, which @kmartinusa pointed out due to a past accident involving a lack of such features. The need for a comprehensive explanation about the jack plate and trim tabs operation also indicated a level of uncertainty about the boat's functionality, reflecting that while the skiff has many strongpoints, it also presents some concerns among perspective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @audiAsh_45786 (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a unique experience, highlighting its rare V10 engine that turns every drive into a celebration. The power and sound of the engine are emphasized, providing a sensory thrill rather than just a means of transportation. The car is portrayed as not only a luxury vehicle but a piece of automotive art that invites admiration, reminiscent of its appearance in popular culture, specifically as favored by characters like Tony Stark. This suggests that the car offers status and excitement, making it a desirable purchase for enthusiasts.
Neutral: In terms of vehicle history, @audiAsh_45786 (The Seller) mentions a minor cosmetic accident that occurred early in the car's life, stressing that it was minor and properly documented by California's strict reporting standards. The seller provides transparency concerning the vehicle's maintenance, noting that it was bought Certified Pre-Owned and had a warranty that has since expired, reinforcing the idea of reliability. Potential buyers inquire about the condition and history of the car, reflecting an interest in its background and any remaining maintenance plans, with responses from the seller confirming the comprehensive care provided.
Negative: Despite the enthusiasm, some commenters express skepticism. @aero99 raises concerns about whether the car has been smoked in, suggesting potential issues with odor or interior quality. There are hints of hesitation when discussing the cosmetic blemish referenced by @steeler28546 and inquiries about warranties that have expired, indicating a desire for greater assurance on quality. Overall, while the seller paints an appealing picture of the vehicle, there are lingering questions and concerns from potential buyers that create a sense of caution regarding the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praised the Solo Electra 720 for its historical significance as an early electric vehicle during the 1970s energy crisis. @singlespeed noted its potential to be displayed in a museum due to its status as a classic piece of EV history. @68C10292 also highlighted how the vehicle showcases the evolution of modern electric vehicles, emphasizing its importance as a mid-drive design before such technologies became mainstream. Positive sentiments were directed towards its unique characteristics and the nostalgia it brings to enthusiasts of electric transportation.
Neutral: Several comments provided factual details about the vehicle, particularly by @Keepit (The Seller), who clarified the specifications, including its power source, range, and top speed. They mentioned the Bosch motor's configuration and the vehicle's capacity to perform as an electric bike. Furthermore, @tehNiemer pointed out an inconsistency in the listing regarding the drive type, indicating a need for clarification but without additional judgment. This neutral commentary focuses on both the technical aspects and observances about the vehicle's intended use for off-road purposes.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns about the suitability of the Solo Electra for off-road use, with @Spider_Mike explicitly stating they wouldn't take it off-road. This sentiment reflects skepticism regarding the vehicle's durability in rugged conditions. Additionally, a query from @Johnnycab about range may hint at potential left uncertainties regarding performance expectations. The comments regarding the need for transportation and packing assistance further indicate logistical concerns surrounding the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its uniqueness and creativity. @Charleetuner called it 'purist blasphemy' in an amusing tone, while @HaaniK noted the fun aspect of hearing the V8 engine sound. @KarmannClassic complimented the high build quality, and @Arts992 admitted to newfound admiration for the 944 design. Those who supported the build, including @Spider_Mike and @Discobob, were excited about its radical modifications and encouraged the auction with good wishes. @Boostwagon imagined mixed reactions from car engineers in Stuttgart, appreciating the fun elements of the makeover.
Neutral: Several comments reflected a balanced view of the vehicle, indicating that while it may not appeal to everyone, it clearly had its merits. @aitalam humorously referenced iconic Porsche designer Ferry Porsche in relation to the vehicle's look, while @LB1 expressed surprise at the existence of a Pro Street 944. @packardv8 noted they anticipated an LS conversion, although it might not fit their taste. @Cgraver remarked on the car's nice condition and zero rust for its year, suggesting it stands out in some respects, but not necessarily for the traditional 944 fan base.
Negative: Some commenters had critical views on the vehicle, questioning its practicality and design choices. @JJRII joked about the seller and buyer needing a watch list, while @3Pedalonly sarcastically noted their dip in admiration for the 944 after seeing this version. @zoltan pointed out the absence of a backup camera as a drawback. @mick59 commented that just because something can be done doesn't mean it should, showcasing skepticism towards the radical modifications. @JoelR highlighted concerns about the car's headlights, adding to a sense of unease regarding its safety features.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting its unique features that differentiate it from U.S. models. @CWCW highlighted the JDM-specific features such as the navigation screen and distinct 16' BBS forged wheels. The car's early model status as the first S2000 from 1999 was also praised by @SimplyAnEnthusiast99, who envisioned enjoying the car with the top down and sunglasses on. Additionally, comments from @brakeservo indicated a strong desire for such vehicles among enthusiasts, emphasizing that driving a right-hand drive car in the U.S. is manageable and enjoyable.
Neutral: Several users sought clarification on the vehicle's specifics and raised questions about the navigation system and trunk features. @rsnider asked whether the navigation system works in North America, while others such as @coreyrose inquired about general pricing trends for RHD imports compared to their U.S. counterparts. There was interest in the vehicle's condition, especially about the antennas on the trunk and questions regarding the original features of the car and whether they could be modified without damage.
Negative: Concerns were raised about discrepancies in the listing due to AI-generated photos. @hai1206vn pointed out potential issues with altered images, questioning their authenticity and reliability, which @waqasmalik (The Seller) acknowledged and sought to address by offering additional clear images. Comments from users like @zakiu and @flopshotgolf indicated skepticism about the car's condition, particularly regarding paint fading and antenna installation, leading to concerns about transparency in the sale. Overall, while there was interest, doubts about the authenticity of the listing and its images dampened the positive sentiments.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, noting its beautiful color combination and well-executed design. @buttesilverbow highlighted that the truck is not overly polished, making it practical for use while still being aesthetically pleasing. @cwsteel praised the attention to detail in the satin black finishes over chrome, while @squirrellymerley loved the matte paint and black trim. @BTUCKRR and @Asalvadore442 also commented on the great color and setup, while @SteadyAtIt admired the overall concept and execution of the build, wishing the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: Several users engaged in clarifying discussions about the truck's specifications and conversions. @tomhiltonjr pointed out that the truck appears to be a 250 rather than a 100, raising questions about its classification. @cornfieldave inquired about the listing of the truck as two-wheel drive despite the images suggesting a four-wheel drive setup. The seller, @MountainCustoms, addressed these queries by explaining that the truck was originally a 2WD F100, and provided insights into its 4WD conversion details without any replacement panels being required during restoration.
Negative: There were minimal negative comments, with the primary critiques revolving around the technical aspects of the vehicle. @cornfieldave's question about the drive type reflected some confusion regarding the mechanical details of the truck. While @tomhiltonjr’s comment about the truck's classification could be seen as a constructive criticism, it lacked negativity towards the build itself. Overall, the feedback remained overwhelmingly positive, with very little in the way of direct criticism of the vehicle's design or functionality.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express high admiration for the vehicle, with @tasmith73 calling it 'gorgeous' and @Arthur.j noting the appeal of the aero kits. @RedArcadia refers to the car as their 'literal dream car' and claims its worth could be around $180k, emphasizing its rare black on black color combination. @AC96993 shares a sentimental attachment to the car, reflecting on regrets about selling it and labeling it as an 'exceptional piece of moving art.' Additionally, @theforce88 and @cesarmsi further reinforce the car's beauty and desirability, celebrating its impressive ownership history and spec.
Neutral: Comments from the seller, @Mattlaw, highlight his willingness to answer questions and engage with potential buyers, ensuring transparency regarding the car's condition. He reassures @Arthur.j and others about the integrity of the door card panels, insists that there are no issues with the door mechanisms, and addresses concerns by offering additional pictures and videos. The seller also shares updates about the auction, mentioning the ongoing nature of inquiries and the availability of service records, thereby fostering a sense of community and interaction among bidders.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the car's history and condition, notably with @bobski mentioning the number of previous owners as a potential red flag. @rsabeebe brings attention to common issues with door pocket failures, suggesting that repairs may be necessary. @lekrz inquires about the driver door catch, sharing a personal experience of costly repairs. @obietajoc raises questions about service records and past paintwork, indicating skepticism about areas of the vehicle that may have been compromised. Moreover, @Vince993s expresses concern over the functioning of door check straps, hinting at costly repairs should they fail.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express their excitement and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting the recent influx of ITRs on the market. @Abernathy01 notes that the ITRs are 'coming in HOT lately', while @TurboR1391 shares that it is the 'season of ITRs'. Commenters like @Tzeus830 and @Vtec4ever describe the opportunities this presents, with Vtec4ever humorously likening the experience to being in 'Nirvana'. The seller, @LS7heaven, is also praised for their thorough responses and transparency about the vehicle's history and included items, leading to a positive impression of the listing.
Neutral: A number of inquiries and comments focus on specific details about the car's condition and original features. @cgreco15 asks about any paintwork and the seller clarifies that no paint work was done under their ownership, although there was some reported respraying on the front bumper. @Risi and @Shalizi inquire about the original stereo code and motor, respectively, to which the seller confirms the original motor is intact. Additionally, there are discussions around the inclusion of stock seats and intake, with @JoeJo3 suggesting that such clarity could enhance the auction's outcome.
Negative: However, some commenters raise concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @oinkus points out potential overspray on the rear bumper, while @stinkytofu and @itrdave reference possible misalignments in the fender. The seller attempts to address these worries and reassures bidders that the damage is merely a trick of light, confirming the original state of the vehicle. Other commenters express frustration at the lack of communication from the seller, as @oo3menace mentions difficulties in reaching out for a local viewing. Despite these concerns, the overall community sentiment remains positive towards both the vehicle and the seller.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praised the vehicle as 'Absolutely beautiful,' reflecting a strong appreciation for its aesthetics. @Friarmike84 expressed enthusiasm about the white leather seats, stating they complement the rest of the interior and noted that this car represents an era when Mercedes was at its peak. @Walter1122 also commended the car's unique interior presentation and commented on the excellent presentation of the auto, which resonated positively with other commenters.
Neutral: @GTAuto (The Seller) provided various comments to engage with potential buyers, sharing details about the auction, including that it is a NO RESERVE auction. They addressed questions regarding the seat color and matched it with the aesthetics of the interior, confirming they have posted a driving video and updated photos to enhance buyer confidence. @IndySam explained the confusion regarding the interior color codes for Mercedes, indicating that different services may yield different interpretations of the interior finishes.
Negative: @ssk2023 raised a concern about the seating color not matching the rest of the car's interior, which sparked additional discussion in the comments. @MikeDLA also shared his experiences of mismatched interior colors in a similar vehicle model and noted the substantial investment needed for replacements. @JRL2 further inquired about the car's inability to pass California emissions, to which @GTAuto (The Seller) responded that the exhaust from previous ownership was not compliant, suggesting lingering issues that could deter some prospective buyers.
|
300Tdi-Powered 1994 Land Rover Defender 110 Pickup 5-Speed
SALLDHHC8LF807824
Lot 202713
Private Party
 |
Positive: @LandEmotion expresses excitement about the vehicle, calling it a dream due to its combination of features and ease of converting into a beach runner. @Cipollina, the seller, appreciates the kind words and engages by providing information about the vehicle's odometer reading of 262k kilometers. Overall, there is a positive sentiment towards the vehicle's capabilities and versatility as a project vehicle.
Neutral: There is some discussion among commenters about the vehicle's history and specifications. @WAGONBOYTD points out that every 110 model is easy to convert and mentions a potential inaccuracy in the vehicle's data plate. Both @Cipollina and @WAGONBOYTD clarify the origins of the vehicle, with @Cipollina stating that the reconstruction was done in Italy, while @BLRacer350 adds information regarding the original assembly in Turkey as indicated by the VIN.
Negative: @WAGONBOYTD raises concerns about the vehicle's authenticity, suggesting that it has undergone alterations that could misrepresent its origins. He points out that the data plate might have been swapped, a common issue in the Land Rover community, while @BLRacer350 emphasizes this by noting the significance of the VIN code. @81Prelude also highlights a potential negative aspect by questioning the low current bid of $17k, suggesting it might be related to the vehicle's provenance.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a generally positive view of the vehicle, with @Jeepwally, the seller, highlighting the good performance of the car after installing the Holly Sniper Fuel Injection, stating it starts, drives, and performs better with this modification. Additionally, he assures potential buyers that all gauges and lights, including the clock, work properly. The functionality of the air conditioning and heater is confirmed to be adequate, further enhancing the appeal for buyers. Furthermore, he mentions upcoming driving videos, which are anticipated to showcase the vehicle's capabilities more visually.
Neutral: Some questions posed by commenters indicate a desire for more information about the car's condition. @Rick60 inquires about the engine's performance, automatic gear shifting, and the convertible top's operation, which suggests that potential buyers are looking for clarity on these technical aspects. @McFood asks about the car's suitability for a long drive to the west coast, which is a practical consideration for buyers weighing travel reliability. Likewise, @Blusick seeks information on any necessary preemptive fixes beyond cosmetic issues, showing that buyers are taking a thorough approach to assessing the vehicle.
Negative: On the other hand, there are some concerns implied in the comments about the car's age and potential issues. @McFood acknowledges the risk of breakdowns in a 56-year-old vehicle, indicating a level of caution regarding the car's reliability. @Classyfellow's inquiry about the air conditioning/heater performance also indirectly suggests concerns about the vehicle's overall functionality, as these systems are essential for comfort and usability. Furthermore, @Blusick's interest in potential mechanical needs outside of upholstery hints at underlying worries that buyers may have about unforeseen repairs as the car continues to age.
|
2024 GMC Sierra 3500HD Denali Ultimate Crew Cab Dually 4×4
1GT49YEY6RF332801
Lot 202737
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commenters express high enthusiasm for the vehicle, with @Viper0311 calling it "badass" and @CRUSH stating their need for the truck. @GL and @bigfitter praise the truck as a "lottery dream truck" and highlight its exceptional capabilities, noting that it can pull almost anything. @1967Shelby complements the vehicle's performance for heavy-duty needs, while @Unicorn74 (The Seller) shares the truck's history, indicating that it was specifically built for impressive functionality. The vehicle's warranty is also underlined as secure due to no engine modifications, promising dependable ownership.
Neutral: Inquiring minds delve deeper into the truck's specifications. Commenters like @Viper0311 and @bigfitter share curiosity about why the seller is parting with the truck so soon and whether warranties remain intact after modifications. @bigfitter specifically questions the potential impact of aftermarket changes on the dealer's warranty. Additionally, @newcarpro provides extensive technical specifications and features of the truck, showing interest in its capabilities and configurations.
Negative: However, some commenters express concerns or skepticism regarding certain aspects of the truck. @2112 mentions issues with their vehicle's transmission as a potential red flag, raising questions about the truck's reliability. @Onlyinaxj90 brings up a concerning observation about potential oil leaks, which could worry prospective buyers despite @Unicorn74 (The Seller) reassuring them of the truck's perfect condition. This mix of excitement and caution highlights the complexities involved in purchasing such a substantial vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: The 1957 Chevrolet Bel Air ‘Fuelie Fury’ has received high praise for its historical significance and aesthetic appeal, with many commenters expressing admiration for its beauty and performance pedigree. @MartinatCABT lauds the car as a 'true beauty queen!', while @PWSchuh emphasizes its place in American automotive performance history, highlighting the original Fuelie combination with documentation from the Bonneville Salt Flats. Other users echo this appreciation, with @Jimmyblues1959 noting its impeccable appearance, suggesting it looks as if it's just been driven off the showroom floor, and @highlander63 appreciating the elegant black and red color scheme. Overall, the vehicle is celebrated for its rarity, well-documented history, and the strong attention to detail in its presentation.
Neutral: Several users have taken a more neutral stance in their comments, focusing on specifics regarding the car's specifications and documentation. @juanruiz (The Seller) presents extensive original paperwork confirming the vehicle's performance features, with many commenters noting both the unique aspects of the vehicle and pointing out potential discrepancies in its specifications. @Mike_Breinin raises questions about the dyno readings, while others like @donnitd and @KBeach inquire about the original restoration process and the authenticity of certain features like the air intake. These discussions reveal an engaged community interested in verifying the details of this classic car's history rather than passing judgment.
Negative: On the other hand, some commenters have expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle's authenticity and performance claims. @C1lover shares doubts based on historical knowledge of similar vehicles, questioning the accuracy of the dyno numbers and suggesting the seller may be embellishing the vehicle's pedigree. @Mike_Breinin backs this skepticism by analyzing the power specifications in detail, noting that the reported horsepower doesn’t align with the car's historical performance. Additionally, @Cruiser283 and @Paul_Dietzel point out variances in expected features for a factory Fuel Injected Bel Air, leading to further scrutiny of the car's original status. This discourse highlights a mix of admiration and critical analysis within the bidding community.
|
 |
Positive: @Quikvet described the car as pretty, wishing the seller good luck. @alfriedesq found the car to be a beautiful machine, enjoying the JBL sound system in their own car and praising the engine sound. @sunkat noted the pristine condition of the top and highlighted the Fabspeed headers, praising the maintenance and aesthetics of the vehicle, especially the red tachometer.
Neutral: @mike_747 inquired about the metallic nature of the paint and whether the OEM exhaust headers were still present, receiving confirmation from PSCC (The Seller) about the metallic finish and the replacement of the headers with documentation provided. @Brinatr42 asked about the condition of the interior buttons, and PSCC (The Seller) assured that they were not sticky and that every Ferrari is inspected for this issue.
Negative: @Brinatr42 and @Snowhill expressed concerns regarding the condition of the interior buttons and the age of the tires and the soft top, respectively. @mike_747 pointed out the potentially high transport fee in the vehicle's service records, indicating that shipping a vehicle should not be as costly as listed. @mike_747 also reminisced about an expensive shipping experience, implying concerns about overpaying for vehicle transport.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the positive attributes of the Land Cruiser. @Barryward expressed that buying this Land Cruiser is a solid choice, with @George0572 (The Seller) confirming that it certainly feels like a great vehicle. @Quindianajones praised the Land Cruiser's capability for long road trips, and @George0572 reassured him by sharing his own positive experience driving the vehicle 800 miles. The seller emphasized that the vehicle is dependable and well-maintained, enhancing its appeal to prospective buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries focused on specific details about the Land Cruiser, demonstrating a balanced perspective. @Smeet58 asked about the absence of an A/C system, to which @George0572 explained that it is a classic, rugged model without factory A/C, but adding one is possible for an additional cost. @Blizzard340 wanted to ensure that the Cruiser could maintain a 65 MPH cruising speed on the highway, and @George0572 confidently replied that it handles speed comfortably. Additionally, @JEGarvin's inquiry about the timing belt highlighted the vehicle's maintenance history, helping potential buyers gauge its condition.
Negative: Some comments raised potential concerns about the vehicle's condition. @Quindianajones pointed out the presence of minor rust, prompting clarification from @George0572 about the rust being merely a surface patch with minimal impact. Despite this reassurance, the mention of rust could deter buyers who prioritize a pristine vehicle. @JEGarvin's inquiry regarding the timing belt replacement also suggests a potential red flag for buyers concerned about proper maintenance, although the seller addressed this by stating the belt appears to be in good condition without signs of wear.
|
 |
Positive: @PeachStateClassics praised the vehicle as a nice, very original 68 model with a great history, expressing good wishes for the auction. @KristenW (The Seller) mentioned that the car, previously owned by her great aunt, has always been kept in a garage and is in great condition. @IrishCB commended @kristenw for her listing efforts, recognizing the care taken to present the car properly. Others like @funkaholik and @sgntpepper78 appreciated not just the car's condition, but also the significant and historic background of the family associated with it, which added emotional value to the auction.
Neutral: @nomospo provided technical insights about the car’s engine, initially mistaking the horsepower rating but later corrected himself. @22truckie, an appraiser, confirmed that the vehicle is in very good condition with an outstanding interior, praising its provenance and unique history while emphasizing the vehicle's appeal. @KristenW (The Seller) acknowledged @PeachStateClassics' advice regarding the wiper foot pedal and thanked the community for their well wishes, highlighting her keeping the spirit of the car alive through her care and efforts in maintenance.
Negative: Some comments pointed out minor issues with the vehicle, such as a small piece of the plastic dome being missing from the interior ceiling light mentioned by @KristenW (The Seller). @PeachStateClassics noted it would be an easy replacement for the next owner, and a humorous error in spelling Carroll's name during appraisal was discussed. Overall, while there were some minor notes, the overwhelming sentiment remained positive towards the car and its history.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the 991 GT2 RS Clubsport as a "magnificent monster," praising its sensational specifications and overall coolness. @Porsche1931 expressed admiration for the homage to the classic 917 Salzburg livery, considering it an awesome car. @sbmaine highlighted its proper usage in track conditions, demonstrating that the vehicle is indeed being appreciated in its intended environment. Additionally, @Stark0116 noted its ease of use as a track car, commending its low maintenance needs and excellent handling characteristics, especially with features like traction control and ABS. @VaultofScottsdale remarked on the car's outstanding care from the Otto Werks team, reinforcing the vehicle's reputation for quality and performance.
Neutral: @ottocarclub, the seller, provided detailed information about the vehicle's features and history, emphasizing its versatility compared to other models such as the GT3 Cup. They also mentioned the car's recent maintenance and that it had not been driven competitively, focusing instead on track days and local events. Some commenters expressed curiosity about specific features, like the spare parts included with the vehicle and the condition of the fuel cell and bladder, with @Rally356 and @BMPV inquiring about the necessary accessories and documentation that come with the sale.
Negative: Despite many positive remarks, there were concerns about the vehicle's use on public roads. @tjahome warned that anyone considering converting the car for street use might soon regret it due to its extreme nature, while @paulwilhide cautioned that it could be too much car for inexperienced drivers. The vehicle's cosmetic condition was also questioned, with @daericks inquiring about any potential damage history, which prompted further clarification from the seller regarding repairs. Overall, while the car received significant praise, some commenters felt it might be unsuitable for everyday driving and posed questions about its track-focused design.
|
 |
Positive: @mrmojo1 describes the vehicle as a "beauty", and @IanW agrees with an enthusiastic "NICE!!!". @gh356 praises its aesthetics, calling it "sleek, sexy and in beautiful condition" and considers it the perfect weekend rider. @Tom_S. reminisces positively about the motorcycle, sharing childhood memories about being fascinated by the Honda 450s and reflecting on its impressive design and mechanics.
Neutral: In terms of logistics, @KeithRichards inquires about rust in the tank and requests running and riding videos. @PJLukes (The Seller) acknowledges that there is some rust and offers to provide a video of the Bomber's startup soon. @XRDV8 asks whether the motor is original to the bike, to which @PJLukes confirms it is. @2BigSky shares a method for cleaning rust, while @Harry_ requests a riding video before placing a bid. @PJLukes assures that a running video has been uploaded but notes it may take time to appear.
Negative: There are some concerns raised regarding the motorcycle's condition. @KeithRichards initially did not see any mention of rust in the interior of the tank and questioned if that information was overlooked. This led to some confusion about the details provided in the listing, as he also queried about any receipts from the previous owner. While @RobBob911 highlights the collectability of Bombers, implying this example could fetch a strong price, the mentions of rust and the need for more videos indicate a hesitance among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @FirehouseVintage, presents the Cayenne Diesel as a well-maintained and fully-optioned vehicle, emphasizing its impressive torque and fuel economy, making it suitable for both daily driving and longer trips. The car has primarily lived in Florida and has been freshly fitted with Pirelli tires. The seller invites potential buyers to engage in conversation, offering clear communication and the opportunity for a Pre-Purchase Inspection, demonstrating a commitment to transparency and customer service.
Neutral: Commenters express curiosity about the vehicle's condition, with @CottonClark noting the attractive color combination and options but also highlighting the limited engagement and bidding activity on the auction. @m4nav shares their positive experience with a similar vehicle, further enhancing the discussion around the car's desirability. There are also inquiries regarding the indents on the interior door panels, illustrating that potential buyers seek clarity about the vehicle's condition and features before bidding.
Negative: Several comments hint at concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly about the "indents" mentioned by the seller. @A_Dopo seeks clarification on what is meant by 'indent', and @Darkness requests closer pictures of these areas, indicating uncertainty about the car's physical state. Additionally, @1972Dino246gts raises an issue with accessing CARFAX reports, suggesting a technical problem during the auction that could hinder potential buyers from obtaining necessary vehicle history information.
|
 |
Positive: @pessia described the vehicle as a nice car, noting that they have the same tires on their own vintage vehicle and were pleasantly surprised by their performance. @MinutemanMike praised the car for being outstanding and highlighted that it has been carefully maintained by a reputable vintage Volvo mechanic. @Craigo expressed excitement for the new owner, warning them to prepare for attention when parking due to the car's unique appeal. Additionally, @car.fanatic mentioned their admiration for the color scheme and provided insight into the vehicle's originality, complimenting the original components. @JLsKA510 also shared their affection for the design, mentioning that they would be more interested if the car were an ES variant.
Neutral: @Warrenlu (The Seller) clarified that the speedometer does work, although it may exhibit a bouncy reading before smoothing out. They affirmed that the overdrive switch is correctly placed and described the extensive refurbishment work the car underwent, including detailed metal removal and rust prevention measures. @kautzman20 appreciated the car’s practical restoration but noted that it lacks some originality and period correctness compared to other models. They acknowledged that the car should still attract strong interest despite these aspects. @isill inquired about the gear performance and the speedometer functioning, prompting responses about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's originality and functionality from various commenters. @XK140cat pointed out that while the speedometer cable was replaced, the video showed that the speedometer was not operational. Furthermore, @charlie55 emphasized the potential issues with the engine modifications noting discrepancies in the engine specifications that could affect performance and originality. @Rauchracer criticized the door weatherstripping installation as having been reversed, which could require replacement due to deformation. Lastly, @Smthrz questioned the condition of the gauges, highlighting issues with the tachometer and oil temperature gauge not working consistently.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments reflect enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly its unique features and specifications. @nlakind expressed a strong interest in the G550 and conveyed a preference for the Magno White finish, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @zak simply stated, 'I love this!', indicating a positive perception of the vehicle's design and branding. Additionally, @sbmaine appreciated the active multi-contour front seats and was surprised the details weren't more clearly highlighted by the listing's copywriters, further showcasing the vehicle's premium features.
Neutral: @FDSLUXURYAUTO (The Seller) was actively engaging with potential buyers, providing essential details like the MSRP and confirming the presence of dynamic seats with a massaging function. When asked about service records, the seller explained that due to privacy policies at the dealership, only Carfax information could be shared, which is a common issue in vehicle sales. @w463 shared their practical experience with the Magno finish, noting that while it requires special soap for maintenance, it tends to be durable and less likely to show typical wear associated with glossy paint finishes.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the maintenance of the Magno finish, with @nlakind initially expressing apprehension about the difficulty of caring for such a matte exterior. @w463 elaborated on the potential drawbacks of matte paint, such as its susceptibility to deep scratches which could require repainting. Overall, while there was appreciation for the vehicle's design, there were also discussions about practical challenges associated with specific finishes and the lack of detailed service history.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their enthusiasm and affection for the Jeepster. @NebraskaJeepster highlighted that it is a beloved classic car that often draws smiles and waves from onlookers, making drivers feel like the 'mayor.' @Ironman.jarvis and @Jersey_Joe shared personal anecdotes about how their own Jeepsters also garnered attention and made for memorable experiences, such as weddings. Commenters appreciated the nostalgia and community aspects associated with owning a Jeepster, with references to clubs like WOJC (Willys Overland Jeepster Club) providing support and information.
Neutral: The seller, @NebraskaJeepster, provided detailed information about the Jeepster’s condition, mentioning some surface rust but assuring potential buyers that the frame is solid. The car has a history, having been owned by the seller's family since 1964, and includes activities like participating in local parades. Potential buyers bystanders, such as @Matt61 and @RustnDust, asked practical questions about the vehicle's specs and cruising speed, to which @NebraskaJeepster responded, noting that the expected cruising speed is about 55-60 mph with overdrive, although he personally had not driven it that fast.
Negative: Some highlights of concern included mentions of the vehicle needing restoration work to be in running condition, particularly due to issues stemming from years of inactivity. @RustnDust specifically raised the question of rust issues, to which the seller replied about the surface rust's normality for a car of its age. While overall the comments reflected excitement for this nostalgic vehicle, there were hints of caution regarding its condition and that it might not be in 'concourse quality,' indicating some buyers might need to invest in further upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: @brandoonm praised the vehicle as a 'gorgeous car' and expressed excitement for the auction, reflecting a positive perception of its aesthetic appeal. @dr.stephan and other commentators noted that it is a 'triple black C7Z', emphasizing its desirable color configuration and implying that it is a good choice for buyers. Additionally, @easterwoodjoel acknowledged the beauty of the car and mentioned that it presents an exceptional value, even suggesting that someone might get a steal at auction.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the specifics of the vehicle and the ongoing auction process. @Poorguy1 (the Seller) facilitated inquiries about maintenance and inspection processes, noting that the winning bidder could have a full inspection at their cost. Additionally, questions about service records and previous ownership history were prompted by commentators like @TheGodFather-, who inquired about the GM extended warranty for cooling issues and any service records for coolant flushes. @2013GS and @MartyKC raised concerns regarding why the seller is parting with the car so soon, highlighting the complexity of car ownership transitions.
Negative: Concerns were raised about potential issues with the vehicle, particularly by @TheGodFather-, who asked several questions regarding its performance, maintenance history, and whether it has ever been tracked or experienced cooling problems. @67Tripower pointed out potential concerns regarding the paint quality and repairs, while @LamboLover77 expressed disappointment about the price, suggesting it may not hold value in the auction. Furthermore, @velocityCC and others inquired about modifications and tread depth, hinting at apprehensions surrounding the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments positively highlight the looks and condition of the vehicle, with users like @Espanolie calling it a "great looking 40th" and @Spud54 praising it as a "beautiful, kudos to the body shop!" Several commenters express excitement about the auction, including @98SNAKEEATER, who mentions the truck should bring in good money despite its repair history. @solarfish, who visited the dealer, commended the repair work done on the vehicle, noting that it was flawless with no apparent frame damage and that the vehicle drove well without any wobble.
Neutral: Several users seek clarification regarding the vehicle's title status and repair details, noting its salvage history. @Prado10 points out the confusion surrounding the title being classified as salvage yet still having a clean title while @fjfhh4k34f asks for photos of the title for assurance. The seller, @TXMTRS, provides detailed responses about the title being clear of any salvage or rebuilt notes and explains the repair history, stating that only the rocker panel was replaced and that repairs were done professionally.
Negative: A few comments express concerns about the vehicle modifications, particularly regarding the dealer-installed lift kits. @SnowyOwl802 raises a unique viewpoint, suggesting that such modifications might detract from the vehicle's value and hinder drivability. @Switchon4go argues that the lift does not affect the vehicle's value, while @SnowyOwl802 implies a disconnect between what the seller is offering versus what potential buyers may prefer. Additionally, @Brousc's inquiry about known electrical issues suggests some lingering doubts about the vehicle's condition despite assurances from the seller.
|
 |
Positive: @440belvedere finds the vehicle very cool and expresses good luck with the sale. @Jack7Black appreciates the condition of the 1990 GSXR and shows interest in getting it running, expressing that it would be more marketable. @Cellamotors, (The Seller), notes that after significant restoration efforts, the bike looks beautiful despite some transport damage. The seller appreciates the positive feedback and mentions that it runs well and has been well-maintained with new fluids and parts.
Neutral: @Cellamotors (The Seller) shares detailed information regarding the bike's specifications, restoration work, and the damage it incurred during transport. They clarify that the bike was originally intended for display but are now addressing concerns about making it functional. Communication between @Cellamotors and @Jack7Black includes inquiries about the condition of the bike following the incident and reassurance of transparency about the transaction.
Negative: @Jack7Black expresses disappointment regarding the damage sustained from the transport incident, questioning the extent and nature of the visible damage to the fairings. @Cellamotors (The Seller) acknowledges the shipping error and indicates a lack of proper precautions, admitting it's a frustrating situation. @buttesilverbow recalls a personal experience with similar bikes and shares that the intimidating aspect of the GSXR is still felt, despite the years that have passed, underscoring a sense of concern for the vehicle’s handling and comfort.
|
 |
Positive: @ArtistFox expressed love for pre-northstar examples, while @patrickquade highlighted the coolness of the Caprice classic with fins. @Allium369 described the Cadillac as absolutely stunning and noted its rarity, stating they might bid on it. @cpa713 called it a dream car for HOA presidents, praising its amazing condition. @Derek_Platt94 viewed it as a beautiful example, recalling the plush ride of a similar car from their childhood. @newcarpro cheered the seller in a positive tone, while @Johnsgenerals (The Seller) showcased the car's unique features and spoke about its strong history.
Neutral: Several users, including @lincolnsandcaddies and @bringatrailer, engaged in a factual discussion regarding the vehicle's attributes and its build information. @newcarpro provided technical details related to the car's VIN and option codes, emphasizing the service reference for potential buyers. @Johnsgenerals mentioned the vehicle's good condition and invited inspections while confirming the functionality of features such as the power seat lumbar switch and the cold air conditioning, which were recently serviced.
Negative: On the negative side, @onebadlsc remarked that while the vehicle is presentable, there are troubling highlighted areas. @MikeDavidPerez criticized the replacement of the crest emblems, labeling them as cheap, while @1935V8 questioned the vinyl roof replacement despite low mileage, implying potential issues with the car's care. There were signs of concern around rust on the underside suspension components, mentioned by @Johnsgenerals, who clarified that this was the only rust present, suggesting the need for further investigations regarding the vehicle's history.
|
 |
Positive: @Cobravila describes it as a strong start, while @Mithril911 expresses that BaT consistently surprises with remarkable offerings. @sunkat shares their enthusiasm for Rossion vehicles appearing on BAT, indicating a heartening thrill. @namuir vouches for the owner as a careful custodian of the vehicle, labeling it an absolutely stunning example noted for its incredible engineering, power, and rarity. @RobM appreciates the car's unique value and affirms that it meets the seller's description as a reasonably priced supercar, admiring its outward appearance and wishing the seller good luck with the sale.
Neutral: @ragtop76 (The Seller) provides an insightful overview of the car’s history, detailing its origins from Noble to Rossion and the extensive updates made to the design and engineering. The information about the tires, particularly their condition and need for replacement, helps set realistic expectations for potential buyers. @sjmorgan highlights essential setup advice regarding tire sizes, suspension height, and engine diagnostics, adding technical knowledge to the discussion without overt praise or criticism.
Negative: @ragtop76 (The Seller) cautions bidders to consider tire replacement costs in their bidding due to the original Continental tires being aged despite having tread left. @sjmorgan also notes previous issues with handling when owners changed tire sizes, indicating some concern about modifications that might affect driving dynamics. @racingrob raises a question regarding documentation for potential SB100 approval in California, suggesting a layer of complication and uncertainty that potential buyers might need to navigate.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praised the vehicle for its impressive condition given its high mileage, with @pmcle stating it reflects "pride of ownership". @GoBigBlue noted the beautiful condition of the seats, while @mntnman73 marveled at how stock and well-kept the vehicle is, suggesting it will be part of a family for years to come. @DavidLeeRaleighNC highlighted the significance of the model year and the minor issues being manageable, further complimenting the service documentation. Additionally, @TheDudeAbides2 remarked on how the Land Cruiser still looks like it just rolled off the lot despite its age.
Neutral comments included questions and observations about the vehicle's features and history. @BabyD69 inquired about the differentiation between a Toyota cruiser and a Land Cruiser, while @sgntpepper78 suggested the seller add video content and was curious about the vehicle's exhaust sound. @SandraProvo (The Seller) indicated she would be uploading a video of a cold start and mentioned discovering an unused tool bag that had been overlooked. Additionally, @Slee-Swain asked about compression numbers, leading to a discussion about the seller's limited car knowledge, which provided insight into the vehicle's background.
On the negative side, some comments raised concerns about specific details. @sgntpepper78 pointed out a potential issue with the exhaust in one of the photos, which brought attention to the need for an updated image. @jayzippy suggested this might just be a photographic flaw, but it nonetheless raised questions. The seller expressed sorrow over their husband's inability to drive the vehicle any longer, adding a personal note to the sale. While the vehicle drew admiration, the comments reflected an underlying sentiment of concern about its future beyond this sale, as touched upon by @sgntpepper78 and others.
Neutral:
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: @cantfinditgrindit finds the vehicle to be rad, while @mein_auto describes it as gorgeous, and @oldDog says it's too cool. @shiftnine provides useful information about the robe rail, demonstrating interest in the vehicle's features. The comments from @lpedemonte, the seller, highlight the vehicle's unique charm and rarity, encouraging potential buyers to place bids. @PWSchuh's humorous perspective on the car having a hidden stash of Cuban cigars adds to the overall positive vibe about this vintage vehicle.
Neutral: @djac70 asks about the robe rail, which @shiftnine explains in relation to the car's design and passenger comfort. @Frost shares a funny anecdote about riding in an Olds Super 88, while @neilpierson25 reflects on the ingenuity required to maintain vintage cars in Cuba, recognizing the car's history. @Harrah1 and @Madhungarian seek more information regarding the car's provenance, indicating curiosity without obvious negativity. Additionally, @donutsdad inquires about the pickup arrangements, suggesting logistical concerns that potential buyers might have.
Negative: There are several concerns raised by commenters about the vehicle's historical journey and condition. @Harrah1 expresses a desire for documentation regarding the car's past and its condition, questioning the functionality of the police radio system and asking about any driving issues. @bbomber's comment reflects confusion about the car's location and size, suggesting a lack of clarity in the listing information. Overall, while the comments include interesting questions, they indicate a level of skepticism regarding the vehicle's documentation and usability.
|
Twin-Supercharged 427-Powered 1986 Ford Mustang GT Hatchback “ProFox” 6-Speed
1FABP28M4GF323634
Lot 202798
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its outstanding build quality and impressive custom details, with @Jags_in_the_barn stating it's one of the best Fox body Mustang builds seen lately. @Mulhollander highlighted the clever OEM style air cleaner that enhances the supercharger setup, while @Z282SLO expressed admiration for the fun factor and aesthetic appeal of the build. Overall, commenters like @Andrewwj and @DKeng described the vehicle as absurdly cool and beautifully executed, pointing out the twin supercharger system and attention to detail throughout the car's design.
Neutral: Several comments focused on questions regarding the specifics of the car's performance and features. Commenters like @EastCoastCarGuy and @7secstreetGT inquired about horsepower numbers, boost levels, and engine specifications, showing interest in the technical aspects of the build. @protourfox, the seller, responded to various inquiries, providing detailed information such as the engine's specifications, tuning methods, and air conditioning system status, thereby creating a helpful dialogue for potential buyers and enthusiasts.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback, a few commenters expressed discontent with certain design aspects, as seen from @Kidsixpack who disliked the stance of the car. Additionally, concerns were raised regarding the proximity of intake piping to the body, as mentioned by @blaine0002, along with some commenters questioning the complexity of the tuning system based on @aconsulting's remarks. While these criticisms were minor, they indicate that there might be differing opinions on specific customization choices.
|
 |
Positive: @Mouse51 appreciates the iconic look of the vehicle, particularly highlighting the distinct four mufflers on the CB 750. @NormalNorm sees the potential in the motorcycle, mentioning that aftermarket parts like 4 into 4 pipes are available at reasonable prices and suggesting that this bike could be a bargain for someone willing to do some work. @Ritchiehenryc (The Seller) provides detailed and reassuring information about the motorcycle's condition, including that all original blinkers are functional and that necessary parts like the front fender and chain guard are included.
Neutral: @Ritchiehenryc (The Seller) answers inquiries regarding the details of the bike, including the reason for the front fender's removal, which was due to tire size compatibility issues. When asked by @Impala-Bill about the motorcycle's registration status, the seller clarifies that it is currently registered in Maine and does not incur any back fees. This information appears to alleviate concerns for potential buyers regarding the registration process when transferring to California, as confirmed by the seller's offer to assist at the DMV.
Negative: @Johnnycab expresses concern about the front fender and turn signals, questioning their installation and the possibility of any original parts being available. This comment reflects a worry about modifications and their impact on the bike's authenticity. Ultimately, @AZXB raises a logistical question regarding how the Maine registration would affect its use in California, hinting at potential complications in the purchasing process.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a nostalgic appreciation for the boat, with potential buyers expressing enthusiasm about its design and history. @B7A6250C highlights how fast a similar boat performed in the past, suggesting that once running, this 14-foot vessel with a 60-hp engine should provide exhilarating speeds on the water. @Boat_Man shares fond memories of skiing behind a Norris Craft boat, indicating a positive association with the brand and a shared love for lake activities. @ccole44 (The Seller) contributes by assuring potential buyers of the boat's unique appeal, noting its fantastic cosmetic condition despite its mechanical uncertainty and the need for it to be sold as a project.
The comments also include productive inquiries about the boat's specifications and condition. @systech1 requests measurements to ensure the boat fits on a car trailer, and @mjbeanie poses detailed questions about the throttle cable and transom condition, showing serious interest from prospective buyers. @ccole44 (The Seller) promptly addresses these questions, offering measurements, confirming the condition of the transom and cables, and providing assurance about the boat's usability.
However, there are cautionary comments that express concerns about the boat's current operability. @Longhair-Bob inquires about previous diagnostic work done on the engine, emphasizing the need for assurance before any purchase, while also humorously acknowledging that the boat project will provide plenty of work. @ccole44 (The Seller) is upfront about the engine not running and needing significant mechanical work, advising potential buyers to assume it will require a full rebuild. Factors such as the decades of storage in a basement and the mention of past repairs also contribute to a cautious tone among some commenters, reflecting the reality of undertaking a restoration project.
Neutral:
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle being sold, a restored 1970 Fiat 500 Jolly, has generated excitement amongst commenters. @wiusa (The Seller) proudly presents the car, highlighting that it includes a Florida title and is a NO RESERVE auction, ensuring the highest bidder will take it home. Multiple comments express confidence in the quality of the listing, with @wiusa providing thorough information about the vehicle's specifications, driving capabilities, and recent restoration. Commenters also praise the vehicle's design and comfort, noting that it can easily convert from a closed to an open-top configuration with minimal effort.
Neutral: Several details regarding the Fiat 500 Jolly's features and current condition were discussed in the comments. @wiusa clarified the soft top situation, addressing inquiries about photos and its proper setup after a previous top was lost in transit. While some commenters, like @cuzinit625 and @bigmike55, asked for specifics regarding the top and frame, others like @needtomakeroom were curious about the car's speed and registration details. @wiusa responded effectively, providing technical insights into the vehicle's engine and performance, reinforcing the practicality of the car for everyday use.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's top were raised by multiple commenters, primarily revolving around its fit and appearance, with @Aiello11 questioning if the top was appropriate for the frame setup. Additionally, @needtomakeroom noted issues with the speedometer and asked for potential operational problems, which @wiusa acknowledged, stating that the gauges could be intermittent. The discussions reveal some apprehension regarding the vehicle's condition and operational reliability, indicating that not all commenters are fully satisfied with the product's presentation.
|
 |
Positive: @matt2025 commented on the truck being one of the best they had seen, highlighting its beauty. @Smogger expressed a long-standing love for these trucks, indicating a nostalgic appreciation that has lasted even when it wasn't trendy to own one. @domtar101 resonated with @Smogger's sentiments, wishing good luck with the sale, while @cyclemikey praised the truck's aesthetics but humorously noted that it feels like one would need to sweep the road before driving it.
Neutral: @Hackberry provided historical context about the truck’s design and longevity, pointing out that Dodge built these largely unaltered for over 20 years and also confirmed to @illdrinktothat that it's indeed a 1968 model. @acett remarked on the unique front opening windshield, suggesting it offers a lot of ventilation. The @Premierautofl (The Seller) highlighted the meticulous restoration of the truck, emphasizing their willingness to assist out-of-state buyers with transport and their readiness to answer any questions.
Negative: @TGwjacod-akota raised concerns about the truck's heating system, seeking clarification on whether it was ever equipped with one. @NickB provided trivia about the truck's production and layout, pointing out inconsistencies in restoration that may have overlooked specific features typical for its year, which leads to concerns about the authenticity of the truck post-restoration. Ultimately, while @CalvadaKing acknowledged many enhancements in this model, @NickB cautioned that the power brakes could provide a false sense of security due to outdated technology, hinting at safety issues.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described as a Quattroporte GTS that is running fantastically well with no mechanical concerns or warning lights, according to @performanceautogallery, the seller. The car has been well maintained under its previous ownership, having received necessary mechanical servicing, including new brakes and a new turbocharger. The seller encourages potential buyers to review detailed images and a video of the car, indicating that it is otherwise unmodified apart from aftermarket wheels that enhance its aggressive stance. The seller is open to questions and has offered to show the car to interested bidders before the auction ends.
Neutral: Several comments regarding the vehicle address concerns about its appearance, particularly the paint finish, with @Doug54 noting excessive "orange peel" on the left side front fender and door, while @Boocher13 also comments on this aspect, suggesting it may be an illusion from reflections. @performanceautogallery responds to these concerns, affirming that although the car has not been paint metered, there is no known paint work and modern paint jobs can often feature orange peel. The seller acknowledges the visibility of stone chips and a small scratch on the passenger side but maintains the car's overall quality as intact.
Negative: There are apprehensions regarding the vehicle's history, particularly the mention of oil leaks by @Doug54, who later expresses that after clarification from the seller, the leaks seem to be an issue of staining rather than active leaks. However, the overall mileage of nearly 100K and age of the vehicle raises questions about its long-term reliability. Additionally, buyers like @bearden inquire about the frequency of brake replacements and whether the buyer should anticipate additional maintenance in the near future, indicating concerns over the car's upkeep and potential future costs.
|
 |
Positive: @Barryward expresses excitement about bidding on the vehicle, while @BadWrapper appreciates the rarity of the Saturn Sky compared to its Pontiac counterpart and believes this will be reflected in the collector market. @uconnhusky2 highlights the aesthetic appeal of the Sky, particularly praising the gorgeous appearance of the car despite some concerns regarding paint mismatches, stating it is typical for the model and looks amazing for its mileage of only 6000.
Neutral: @newcarpro provides detailed vehicle information, including the model and build specifics for the Saturn Sky. @excaliburmotorsports (The Seller) notes that the vehicle is in excellent condition, showcasing its low mileage and various features. Discussion among commenters, including @widetracpontiac73, revolves around the paint composition, with acknowledgment of the different materials used on the car and their potential impact on color matching, noting that different angles may affect perception.
Negative: @JosephDAZ raises concerns about a potential paint respray on the car, suggesting a mismatch in color. @widetracpontiac73 supports this view by pointing out a noticeable discrepancy in paint on the driver's fender based on personal experience at the manufacturing plant. Additionally, the discussions indicate that some experienced Sky owners notice variations in color that contribute to skepticism about the vehicle's paint uniformity.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its stunning appearance and unique color combination, with @Dafried and @Silvas01 highlighting its eye-catching design. @David993S referred to it as a beautiful 3000, further emphasizing the overall aesthetic appeal of the car. Moreover, @MNberg appreciated the color combination and noted that it looks well maintained since its restoration, showing strong positive sentiments towards its presentation and desirability.
Neutral: There were several inquiries and discussions regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @Ducatisti1 raised questions about the rear ride height and the soft-top attachment, while @Rockin3B pointed out a potential flaw in the front grill. The seller, @Significant_Cars, provided clarifications on various aspects, including the restoration timeline, stating that the seller purchased the car in 2018, and mentioning that the original restoration records were unavailable due to the restoration company going out of business. The discourse included multiple detailed requests for photographs and engine numbers, reflecting inquiries aimed at understanding more about the car's integrity.
Negative: On the downside, some comments pointed out details that detracted from the car's overall quality. @gustos32 specifically noted a lack of attention to details during restoration, mentioning minor flaws such as incorrect painting and subpar upholstery work. @BOBvR expressed concerns regarding the legitimacy of the VIN tags, stating that the reproduction looked suspicious and discussing potential misidentifications. Additionally, there were discussions about the rear ride height being a concern, with multiple commenters, including @Astonjag and @rx_jagetc, expressing opinions about the car's stance. Overall, while the car was generally appreciated, these criticisms indicated unresolved issues that could affect its market value.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, acknowledging its good condition and presentation. @ddrxdd praises the auction's sorting, while @johnnyvett reminisces about the Samurai's history, highlighting its status as a solid 4X4. Others note how the vehicle garners attention at events, with @935DP (The Seller) recounting its participation in Hagerty’s RADWOOD. @reibrown compliments the Samurai's off-road capability, indicating it was fun to drive, particularly on trails.
Neutral: Several users pose questions or comment on specific features of the vehicle without strong positive or negative sentiment. @ddrxdd asks about driveshaft disconnection when towing, showing a practical interest in its functionality. @Daggersf raises concerns about the horn not working, but acknowledges the vehicle's high mileage. @pewwwp inquires about smog compliance, reflecting common concerns for buyers in certain regions. @935DP (The Seller) responds to many of these inquiries with detailed insights into the vehicle's history and specifications, aiming to clarify any uncertainties.
Negative: A few commenters raise concerns that suggest potential issues with the vehicle. @Frick mentions the uncertainty of high-mileage towed vehicles and the risk of misreported mileage, which may deter some buyers. @beakyboy36 makes a humorous jab about emissions, implying that the vehicle could be a problem for some states due to pollution standards. The discussion around the horn not working, mentioned by @Daggersf, although ultimately clarified by @935DP (The Seller), hints at concerns that may be perceived by potential buyers regarding the vehicle's maintenance and overall care.
|
7k-Mile 2000 Ford F-550 XL Super Duty Power Stroke Dually
1FDAF56F5YEC85218
Lot 202810
Private Party
 |
Positive: @acemobilesrq noted that the vehicle features an Aura generator that was once highly sought after, praising its unique design and capabilities. They pointed out that this particular model has a substantial output, up to 20KW, highlighting its potential as an ideal service truck. Additionally, @Davidch1974, the seller, confirmed that most components from the previous auction remain intact, which is reassuring for interested buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Charlie09 and @Xavier28, have inquired about specific measurements and functionalities of the vehicle, demonstrating an interest in its specs. @Handsometrucker asked for details regarding the operational status of the generator and other parts, expressing a genuine curiosity about the truck’s performance. These inquiries reflect a desire for clarity rather than outright criticism or praise, indicating the need for more information to inform potential buyers.
Negative: @Tommy_gunz humorously suggested that the current owner may have removed parts just to resell the vehicle, implying skepticism about the seller's intentions or the vehicle's condition. Such comments can cast doubt on the vehicle's reliability and the seller's transparency. Although not all comments reflect negatively, this doubt could affect potential buyers’ perceptions.
|
 |
Positive: @Craven highlights that the vehicle retains its distinctively Cadillac styling while being more efficient. @lincolnsandcaddies describes it as a 'great great car' that is reliable with a 'bulletproof' 4.5L engine, emphasizing its comfort and quality. @Thesenator assures potential buyers that the car is road ready following a recent multi-point inspection and maintenance, boasting that the vehicle has been stored in a climate-controlled garage since purchase.
Neutral: @johnjm notes that the appeal and value of these end-of-the-eighties de Villes has been increasing over time, especially remarking on the triple black color as a desirable trait, although he mentions it may not be ideal for Texas summers. @mydatsoon inquires about the vehicle's performance over a long drive to Iowa, indicating that potential buyers may have logistics to consider. Additionally, @Marzar raises several questions regarding the condition of various features of the car, such as the windows, keys, air conditioning, and the paint, showing interest in the vehicle's specific details.
Negative: @GP65 expresses concern over the age of the tires, stating that they are 20 years old according to Carfax and suggests that this makes the vehicle unsuitable for highway driving. @Thesenator acknowledges this worry but counters that the tires are in excellent shape based on personal experience driving the car, though he cannot comment on the heating aspect due to the extreme heat in Texas. Overall, there are anxieties surrounding the vehicle's maintenance history and readiness for immediate use.
|
 |
Positive: @gmasters (The Seller) expresses great satisfaction with his Maserati GranTurismo, describing it as an impressive vehicle that offers both an adrenaline rush and comfort. He has enjoyed daily driving the car, highlighting its ideal sound and impressive power, and reports no mechanical problems after 24,000 miles of driving. @Jaymerritt shares a similar positive sentiment, noting that once he resolved a variator issue on his own GranTurismo, he experienced two years of hassle-free ownership while keeping the vehicle well-maintained.
Neutral: Comments about the car's interior quality raise some concerns, with @Just_me and @sunkat pointing out potential sun damage and surface wear. @gmasters (The Seller) responds that the car's leather has had some localized issues that can be addressed and clarifies that the interior damage is not as severe as that seen in other GranTurismo models. The seller also states he has no service records before 2019 and relies on the Carfax for history, indicating a common use is often seen as beneficial for the car's condition, according to @Just_me.
Negative: Several comments reflect apprehensions about the vehicle's condition. @BPOTBAM questions the check engine light present in a photo, while also expressing concern over the state of the interior, describing it as severely damaged. @gmasters (The Seller) reassures that the check engine light is a temporary indicator after startup, criticizing the perception of the interior's quality by referencing worse examples from the market. However, the underlying worry about leather peeling and bubbling persists among potential buyers, indicating a notable concern regarding the vehicle's upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: @onlyhonda4me expressed that the rare GPW color is stunning and sees potential in the vehicle as a great opportunity for a buyer to enhance its value. @schigh noted that despite some unfortunate choices regarding certain features, the important mechanical aspects of the vehicle seem clean. The color combination was also covered positively, reinforcing that the car would still be a blast to drive, which is crucial for an S2000.
Neutral: @997TTS acknowledged the seller's objective representation of the car's condition, which they appreciated. @kevinmartin12 (The Seller) clarified the mileage title brand issue and assured that there are no discrepancies with the odometer. They also mentioned the condition of the wheel finish and their lack of knowledge regarding its history concerning winter driving.
Negative: @Rockland raised concerns about the carpet on the dash and the velcro patches, suggesting that they may cause damage. @UOENO requested photos without the dash cover since they find it hard to bid fairly without knowing the condition of the dash. @lslbtr questioned whether there is a crack on the dash in one of the pictures, indicating potential issues with the vehicle's interior.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express excitement about the vehicle's aesthetic qualities and features. @stathios highlights the appeal of the 1994 Ford Bronco XLT, emphasizing its availability for inspection and the complimentary storage offered post-sale. @jsloden and @FW_BRONC enjoy the unique bench seat arrangement, with @jsloden recalling a previous customization that enhanced his experience in owning a Bronco. Overall, there seems to be a genuine appreciation for the Bronco's design and the intricacies of its options.
Neutral: Several participants share their curiosity regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @BlueCT questions the decision to leave the seats in their current state despite spending money on repainting, hinting at potential underlying issues. @stathios provides reassurance that potential buyers can inspect the vehicle and explains that it is part of a consignment deal, leaving repair decisions to the owner. Other commenters like @Jobu611 and @Toker01 join in to discuss various options for inspecting the vehicle and the stories behind specific features, such as the rarity of the split bench seat.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's condition are raised throughout the discussion. @FW_BRONC and @mrrrkva both note signs of potential rust in specific areas, questioning the quality of past repairs, especially given its history in New York. @smichn experiences technical issues with the video's availability, casting doubt on the listing's credibility, while @CastellanMC worries about the metal and paint behind the trims. Overall, these comments reflect skepticism around the vehicle's maintenance and the transparency of its restoration process.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has been described as absolutely stunning, with one comment from @Duroc emphasizing its gorgeous appearance. He notes that it is in perfect harmony, balance, and style, suggesting a high level of aesthetic appeal and quality design. This implies that the vehicle stands out and could be admired for its beauty and craftsmanship.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle do not indicate any technical specifications or performance metrics, leaving it ambiguous whether the focus is solely on visual appeal. There are no mentions of functionality, maintenance concerns, or usability aspects, which suggests that observers might primarily be captivated by its design rather than its practical attributes. This could mean that some potential buyers may need more information before making a decision.
Negative: No negative comments were provided regarding the vehicle in the feedback. The absence of criticism might reflect a positive narrative surrounding this particular bike, but it could also imply a lack of comprehensive reviews that encompass various aspects of the vehicle beyond its aesthetics. Without any warning signals in the comments, interested parties may need to tread cautiously and investigate further.
|
 |
Positive: @LB-BOB (The Seller) highlighted the rarity and rich history of the MATRA Djet, noting that it is a unique automobile that not many people will have the chance to own in the U.S. Several commenters echoed excitement about the beauty and historical significance of the car, with @richpopek calling it "gorgeous" and @pelzo remarking on its status as one of the first production mid-engine sports cars. @Drdjet, who has personal experience with Djets, endorsed the car's quality, declaring it as possibly the nicest example available. The enthusiasm captured by these commenters reflects a deep appreciation for the car's pedigree and design.
Neutral: Comments reflected curiosity and interest in the auction process. @SwiftFF5 expressed concern over the financial aspect, indicating it might be out of reach for them but was still intrigued by the auction's progression. @kkherman provided a thoughtful suggestion to @Johnnieblack about the challenge of liquidating a vehicle in a limited time frame to pursue this purchase, showing an understanding of the logistics involved. The conversation about its registration status in California was clarified by @LB-BOB, who confirmed that the car is titled and plated in the state, making it comfortable for potential buyers considering this detail.
Negative: There were some concerns raised regarding the functionality and specifics of the vehicle, particularly around the radio. @500drvr questioned the radio setup, and @LB-BOB acknowledged that the radio was not operational and lacked speakers, describing it as not necessary given the driving experience the Djet offers. Additionally, @Drdjet shared practical considerations regarding the car's tight interior space for larger drivers, indicating that comfort might be an issue. Overall, while the comments about rarity and beauty were strong, these concerns did introduce a level of practicality to potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @pricesensitive highlights the car's good care and service history, expressing hope it finds a good home at auction. @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as absolutely beautiful, signaling admiration. @Scott_S appreciates the car's presence, noting the perfect mileage of 10K and its timeless colors, while @E.Bugatti simply remarks on its beauty, contributing to the overall positive tone surrounding the vehicle.
Neutral: @AudiChip (The Seller) provides clarifications on the ownership history, explaining that changes in title can lead to multiple owners reported in a short span. The seller also confirms there are no musty odors or smoke present in the vehicle, addressing @Simplebiz's concerns effectively. Additionally, @Fmp1971 inquires about the coverage of an extended maintenance program, to which @AudiChip responds that the vehicle is under a transferable warranty purchased in July of 2024.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the Rolls Royce 'protection plans', with @Simplebiz questioning their coverage on mechanical faults and requesting a copy of the plan agreement. There is a hint of skepticism about the vehicle's previous ownership and whether it has retained original parts, as expressed by @E.Bugatti, asking to check the date codes on the rubber components.
|
 |
Positive: @RobTX expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it stunning and very cool. @GatorDMD remarked on its beauty and the excitement surrounding it. Many commenters noted specific positive features, such as the car's original color being rare and its overall well-maintained condition, emphasizing that it is a great example of a rare and iconic model.
Neutral: Several comments raised questions regarding the car's components, such as @HarryFD inquiring about a full-sized spare and tool roll, and @Frankieballs asking about the functionality of the clock. @isill pointed out discrepancies regarding the model year, and @Pmo75 and @M7RRY were interested in the condition of the lower body trim and inspection of the car, respectively. @htxtarga (The Seller) provided clarification on several of these points, addressing concerns and offering additional information.
Negative: @70SATMan expressed significant concerns about the front pan replacement, describing it as a tragedy and highlighting issues with potential rust and past restoration work. This sentiment was echoed by other commenters who questioned the quality of previous repairs and consistency with factory specifications. @rickstermachine noted issues regarding a specific component related to the air cleaner, suggesting a lack of attention to detail in the vehicle's presentation.
|
 |
Positive: @Paulienco (The Seller) mentions that the car runs great, starts right away, and is a meticulously restored example of the 1931 Model A, which has always been stored indoors and is considered a real gem. @dagmar82 praises the car for its authenticity, stating it looks exactly as a Model A should without unnecessary modifications. @BigRed appreciates the originality of the car, highlighting its all-black body and absence of a right-hand tail light, which he finds cool.
Neutral: @smichn asks for videos showing various aspects of the car, while @Fez notes the need for clarification on the closing of the doors as they appear not fully closed in the photos. @Woodland66 has specific questions about the car's features, indicating an interest in details like the jack and tools, as well as the brass fitting above the fuel filter.
Negative: @Fez expresses concern over scratches on the car, suggesting they might be deeper than noted, which leads to scrutiny of the car's overall condition. @Woodland66 points out a loud knocking noise in the vehicle's videos, suggesting it could indicate an issue with the engine, which could concern potential buyers. @Paulienco responds to criticism by describing some comments as trolling and urges serious inquiries rather than speculative remarks.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the positive aspects of the 2008 Mercedes Benz X164 GL450 4Matic AWD, with @aegmotorsports providing detailed descriptions of its high-end features including a premium sound system, dual-zone climate control, and advanced safety technologies like Parktronic parking sensors. The vehicle is described as "gorgeous" with a reliable 4.7L V8 engine, indicating both performance and aesthetic appeal. Additionally, the seller emphasizes the availability of an extended warranty, enhancing buyer confidence in the vehicle's reliability.
Neutral: Several commenters, such as @hoffmantown and @jlk1224, inquire about the vehicle's condition and operations. @hoffmantown requests videos of the interior and exterior, while @jlk1224 asks about the functionality of various buttons. The seller, @aegmotorsports, assures potential buyers that videos will be posted soon and confirms that there are no sticky buttons and all features are operational. This interaction demonstrates a level of transparency and responsiveness from the seller, which is appreciated by potential buyers.
Negative: There are no explicitly negative comments regarding the vehicle, but the inquiries from @hoffmantown and @jlk1224 could suggest some skepticism regarding the vehicle's physical condition and functionality. The lack of initial videos or visual evidence may leave some potential buyers feeling uncertain until they receive the requested information. However, @aegmotorsports' prompt responses seem to mitigate these concerns, indicating that the seller is actively working to address any uncertainties.
|
 |
Positive: @MideastClassicsLLC confirmed that the vehicle features power steering, addressing @Chamba's inquiry. @Bringatrailer appreciated the clarification and updated the listing to reflect this detail. Regarding the motor and transmission, @MideastClassicsLLC also assured that both are working perfectly, which enhances the appeal of the vehicle to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed the bidding dynamics and market situation surrounding the vehicle. @KevinMcgowan expressed a desire for the truck but is concerned that without at least a $40,000 price tag, it might not sell. @WhatWhat suggested that the expected final price might be around $26k-$28k. Meanwhile, @7schulz emphasized the rarity of the LHD Troopy in the US, and @Duke03 agreed, explaining the challenges in sourcing a clean model, which takes time and effort.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the seller's pricing strategy and market effects. @tasmanjay accused the seller of flooding the market with Troopies, potentially driving down prices. @KevinMcgowan pointed out a history of the seller not accepting offers below $20,000, supporting the notion that the market dynamics might be unfavorable. Additionally, @Henrythewound inquired about possible rust issues under the floormats, suggesting some buyers are cautious about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @RPOLS5 commented on the vehicle's aesthetics, noting its nice looking red color combination. @Shawh praised the red and red color scheme, wishing good luck to the seller. @johnnyvett described the Corvette as great looking and remarked on the seats possibly being redone in leather. @Sullyman1 complimented the birdcage pictures, highlighting their quality. Additionally, @Monopolychris (The Seller) shared that the Corvette has been well-maintained with various recent service items, emphasizing that it is very roadworthy and runs extremely strong.
Neutral: @JimmoVette pointed out that the lack of a third pedal and the luggage rack could impact the car's desirability, although acknowledged the tilt/tele and A/C features as positives. @ShowMeStingray raised a concern about the speedometer pointer being missing and inquired if the speedometer and odometer were still functional. @The_Ginger asked for clarification on a line in the engine bay and expressed interest in its heating control setup. @cd619 and @kwalexander raised similar queries regarding the title status and functionality of vacuum-run accessories, while @Monopolychris (The Seller) addressed these questions and mentioned that the car is rust-free.
Negative: @JimmoVette noted that the missing luggage rack and lack of a third pedal might impede the vehicle's appeal. @ShowMeStingray's inquiry about the speedometer indicated a potential issue with the car's instrumentation. Furthermore, @cd619 questioned the functionality of various vacuum accessories and inquired about any corrosion issues, illustrating a concern for the vehicle's overall condition. @ctalisman expressed uncertainty regarding whether the assembly and stamp dates coincide with the vehicle being numbers matching, hinting at potential authenticity concerns.
|
 |
Positive: @OldsCamaro praised the Thunderbird as beautiful, while @7257scottt noted it was a really nice example with a beautiful color combination. @boaboyoz described it as a delightful representation of the classic Inca Gold edition, indicating it looked very nice overall. @northrupw (The Seller) acknowledged improvements based on feedback, adding videos to provide more clarity about the car's engine performance and overall condition. Several commenters, such as @birddoc, @Fourtoes, and @Boostwagon, echoed sentiments of admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its potential for being an outstanding classic car.
Neutral: @Fez initially critiqued the listing video for lacking substantial information, although he later mentioned the engine sounded healthy. @RFortuna and @mtbird66 raised practical questions regarding the car's repairs, functionality of gauges, and soft top color, reflecting a desire for transparency. @northrupw (The Seller) was responsive to inquiries, offering to provide additional videos and clarify confusion about the vehicle's condition and features. The conversations around the importation process, taxes, and warranties showed an engaged community seeking detailed knowledge about buying the vehicle.
Negative: @charliebird123 expressed frustration about the seller's delayed response to questions, indicating a loss of interest in the car. @tdub59 raised concerns about potential damage to the paint where the hardtop sits, while @gocorcoran commented on the expected leaks inherent in older models. Some users questioned the overall condition and repairs needed based on the seller’s responses, highlighting a level of skepticism regarding the vehicle's upkeep and the seller's knowledge about the car. @northrupw (The Seller) faced scrutiny over the gaps in information and service history, but made efforts to clarify and assure potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters shared their admiration for the vehicle, underscoring its quality and driving experience. @Luv2eat praised the tasteful modifications, while @Legacy121 highlighted the joy of owning the Cayman S, describing it as a fun car that embodies the best of the Porsche brand. Other enthusiasts like @ex099 and @BlitzLead echoed similar sentiments about the Cayman, with @ex099 noting it as a beautiful iteration and @BlitzLead emphasizing its affordability without compromising on amazing performance. Additionally, @bigmike55 touted it as the best handling car on the road, reinforcing the positive consensus around its driving dynamics.
Neutral: @Legacy121, the seller, engaged with prospective buyers throughout the discussion, providing details about the vehicle's maintenance and condition. He addressed specific inquiries, such as the IMS bearing, bore scoring, and the recent oil analysis, ensuring transparency in his responses. He noted that although the IMS had not been replaced, the design was less prone to failure than in other models. The seller also shared information about the new headliner and provided insights into the car's suspension and alignment, which were completed after purchase to ensure optimal driving performance.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some commenters, particularly regarding the maintenance history and potential issues with specific components. @Rangerboy2011 questioned whether the IMS had been replaced, while @Snowman87 inquired about the rear main seal and bore scoring checks. Although @Legacy121 reassured that there were no significant issues with the vehicle and that the crankshaft seal had been replaced, these inquiries reflect a cautious approach from potential buyers, indicating that they are looking for assurance on the car’s condition before committing.
|
 |
Positive: @jmosh2711 (The Seller) describes the motorhome as built on a heavy-duty Chevrolet C-30 truck chassis, indicating that it drives like a truck and is easy to handle. The motorhome is noted for its stability, with large sway bars that prevent tipping in turns or crosswinds. @jmosh2711 also emphasizes that the vehicle has been very dependable, stating he has no hesitation in taking it anywhere in America. Moreover, he and @roverchef commend its excellent maintenance, with @roverchef describing it as a "time capsule" and lauding the care it has received.
Neutral: Several comments raise questions about the vehicle's specifications and condition. @montgomri inquires about the driving experience and fuel efficiency, while @poke1 asks for clarification on whether the frame is attached to the receiver or bumper. Additional inquiries include @bowtie6772's questions regarding the gas tank size and transmission type, indicating a mix of curiosity from potential buyers about the vehicle's performance metrics. @jmosh2711 provides detailed responses, confirming the transmission type and discussing the age and condition of the tires, as well as the MPG estimates based on driving conditions.
Negative: Some concerns arise from the condition and reliability of specific components. @TessieB questions the age of the tires and requests more photos of the undercarriage, highlighting potential issues that buyers may want to assess further. @jmosh2711 addresses these concerns directly, stating the tires are in good condition but others, like @steeleman, note discrepancies in the mileage records. Overall, while many comments appreciate the vehicle's quality, a few potential buyers express caution and request more information before proceeding.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described as being in impeccable condition, having been well-maintained by @seller's father, who treated it with great care. @seller emphasizes that the car was never neglected and has a history of meticulous attention, including regular hand washes and waxes, and kept in a climate-controlled garage. Several commenters, like @barryward and @CA-Jag, express admiration for the car's appearance and report that it shines beautifully, highlighting its quality and care over the years. @CA-Jag noted the car's history in car shows and acknowledges the love and effort @seller's father had for it, contributing to its excellent state.
Neutral: There is a mix of inquiries regarding specific repairs and maintenance details. @mkark21 and @murphyscu seek clarification on the cause of some mechanical issues, like vibrations during acceleration and the status of key components such as the tensioners and hydraulic hoses. @seller responds to these queries, stating that the car underwent a thorough inspection and that necessary repairs were made or confirmed, including references to the CarFax, which provide some service history, although there are still areas where clarity is needed. This indicates a balanced consideration of the car's performance and maintenance history.
Additionally, @packardguy requests undercarriage photos, and @seller mentions that they have limited images due to not having a lift but assures that the underside is pristine. There is also discussion around the possibility of needing further documentation concerning the timing tensioners, with @CA-Jag urging @seller to find past service records.
Negative: Some comments raise potential concerns regarding the car's age and certain components that may require attention in the future, like the tensioners and hydraulic lines. @murphyscu points out that although the top is functioning perfectly, hydraulic lines could fail without service. There are also discussions about the absence of detailed repair records, which could affect buyer confidence. @CA-Jag highlights that the front suspension may have issues, suggesting common problems that arise with older vehicles, particularly regarding worn shock mounts, showing that while the car has been well cared for, there are underlying concerns that prospective buyers should consider.
|
 |
Positive: @AngelsMotors (The Seller) presents the Chevy Military Blazer as an extremely rare and iconic vehicle, highlighting its history and originality. The truck has been well-preserved with a completely original exterior and a resprayed interior using heavy-duty materials. The seller mentions a solid track record of zero issues over the past decade, showcasing reliability and care with features like a 42 lift kit and a legendary 6.2L diesel engine, which is noted for its bulletproof performance. Enthusiasts seem to appreciate the authentic military styling and the substantial upgrades that have been made to the vehicle, including the lift and tires.
Neutral: Interactions between @ted8541 and @AngelsMotors (The Seller) reveal a collaborative atmosphere where potential buyers ask specific questions about the vehicle's condition and features. @dynamic1 points out some misinformation regarding the diesel engine, which leads to clarifications about the specific engines offered in different models. Various questions about the vehicle details, such as the removable roof and the usability of the trailer hitch, are addressed by the seller, indicating a willingness to provide necessary information for informed bidding decisions.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the engine and its modifications, as @charlie46 shares a comment on the flaws of the Humvee engines, indicating a level of skepticism about the durability of military-grade vehicles. Additionally, @CDehne raises questions about the compatibility of the vehicle's rear end gears with the larger tires, pointing towards potential performance inadequacies. Lastly, @hankster inquires about smog regulations, showing additional uncertainty for buyers regarding legal aspects tied to older diesel vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @DLCNC notes that the vehicle appears to be a well-preserved specimen and wishes the seller good luck. @RickGoble (The Seller) indicates pride in the car's original condition, emphasizing that it has never been driven in rain or snow, stored in a heated garage, and maintained perfectly with only routine upkeep. Many commenters admire the vehicle's condition; @JimK simply states, "This is a good one," while @RickGoble captures the spirit of the sales by stating the car is meant to provide joy and calling it a gem.
Neutral: Discussion around the car touches on the pre-catalytic converter issues common with earlier models. @Jtpryan and @manistee elaborate on the significance of these components, suggesting that many owners opt for replacement membranes to avoid potential engine failure. @7c777r mentions community discourse on whether it is necessary to replace the pre-cats and emphasizes that these vehicles are generally easy to maintain for those willing to perform some DIY work.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle are primarily directed at the tires, with @Carunch warning that the older tires may pose a safety hazard, implying that they will harden over time. @RickGoble acknowledges that while the tires are older, he insists that they do not detract from the overall value of the car. Nevertheless, @Carunch counters, stating that climate control alone does not preserve tires, reinforcing the caution surrounding their condition.
|
 |
Positive: @MalibuMotors describes the vehicle as their 'dream car'. @Beans_Bacon praises it as a beautiful International, stating that many would desire this car and emphasizing its authenticity with a comment about not being able to fake it. @tlcamg enthusiastically claims that it's back and shining, possibly even more than before, highlighting how impressive the details are and expressing admiration for the seller's presentation. @blw0924 notes the cleanliness of the build and commends the photographer's skills, wishing the seller good luck with the auction, while @andytrio endorses it as one of the best Scouts he's seen, reflecting on its strong history in past listings.
Neutral: @ArchSail brings up a point that the car was built to resemble a Super Scout, adding a note of caution about the authenticity while still acknowledging the quality of the build. @Ebifurai humorously comments on the LS swap, expressing that it alleviates any concerns about the car not being a real Super Scout and raises curiosity about its potential market value. @JimAllen, despite his tendency toward purism, admires the homage it pays to the original model and recognizes the quality of the build, suggesting a balanced view of its merits.
Negative: @ArchSail's comment touches on the car's lack of authenticity, which may concern some buyers looking for a genuine Super Scout. This sentiment is echoed by @Ebifurai, who identifies it as a clone but seems to find solace in the LS swap. The comments hint at a divide between purists who might prefer original vehicles over replicas and those who appreciate the craftsmanship regardless of authenticity. Overall, some comments reflect a disappointment in the vehicle's status as a clone rather than a true original.
|
2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport Supercharged Autobiography
SALSP2E47DA794273
Lot 202825
Private Party
 |
Positive: @ecded (The Seller) responded promptly to inquiries about the vehicle, providing clarity on the rims being original and offering additional photos of the rear headrest entertainment screens. This indicates a proactive and customer-friendly approach to selling the vehicle, which is appreciated by potential buyers.
Neutral: The ongoing dialogue around the vehicle involves various inquiries about its features, including questions about the rims and interior condition, showcasing potential buyers' interest in details. Additionally, inquiries about the timing chains and service history highlight a focus on the vehicle's maintenance background, which is typical in used car transactions.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the absence of records for the timing chains and the condition of the leather seats, with one buyer noting potential blemishes on the white perforated leather. The lack of definitive service records may lead to uncertainty about the vehicle's maintenance history, which could deter some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle's performance and condition. @SteveMatko shared a nostalgic remark about its history and the effectiveness of the Coyote engine, stating it ran perfectly during his long drives. @gmagno echoed this by mentioning that he had driven the Bronco recently and found it to handle well, describing it as a 'beast of a rig.' The seller, @mbrandonmotorcars, noted the quality of the Bronco, encouraging inspections and promising a driving video to showcase its capabilities, which adds to the vehicle's positive perception.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about details and features of the Bronco. @dwedwards68 posed specific questions regarding the back window operation, the existence of the original center console, and steering alignment issues. The seller provided informative responses, confirming the back window functions well and addressing the steering concerns, indicating that it drives well apart from minor pulling under hard brakes. This clarification helped to maintain a neutral stance on the vehicle's state without heavily leaning towards positivity or negativity.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the Bronco's condition. @gmagno pointed out that while the vehicle runs and drives great, the paint is duller than in the photos and the pinstripes are degrading, suggesting that a respray might be necessary for perfection. Additionally, @Conecuh raised a question about a missing door seal, which the seller acknowledged, indicating it was how the vehicle arrived and offering a straightforward solution to order the part online. These comments hint at minor imperfections that potential buyers should consider.
|
 |
Positive: @NJNewb thinks that the Bronco is perfect, while @thiswildbronco describes it as a nice looking Bronco. @boaboyoz compliments the Asphalt Gray Bronco, noting it as a lovely build. @PC4x4 also appreciates the beauty of the build, expressing admiration without negative commentary.
Neutral: @Broncotime (The Seller) answered questions posed by @thiswildbronco, explaining that the small black sensor is for the electric running board switch and detailing the wiring for power windows. The Seller provided an extensive list of features, highlighting the fresh build and quality components like the new Coyote engine, AX15 transmission, and Kincer chassis, emphasizing that it runs and looks amazing. @UDFlyent10 requested videos of the Bronco driving from the cabin perspective.
Negative: While most comments are positive, @PC4x4 provided a slight correction by identifying that the steps on the Bronco are Patriot Classic 4x4 steps rather than Amps, suggesting there may be minor discrepancies in the build details that could affect potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, with enthusiasts praising the beauty and craftsmanship of the build. @mattowens1023 refers to the car as the most beautiful thing they've seen in a long time, while @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 suggests that converting wagons to M-series variants would be highly successful. Other users, like @ipc838 and @thkfast, express eagerness to acquire the car, with many noting the impressive effort put into the project. The consensus among commenters is that this build is not only visually stunning but also a remarkable feat in terms of engineering and creativity, with @Bahram2018 calling the execution flawless.
Neutral: Several comments highlight technical aspects and the process of the build, often seeking clarification or more details. @startfinish and @Aweh ask questions regarding emissions compliance and specifics about the building process. @attilars (The Seller) responds with transparency, explaining the modifications, the effort involved, and the certifications achieved in California. Some users, like @Hamachibelly, engage in technical discussion about structural aspects, while others ask about practicalities like insurance. Overall, there is a flow of constructive dialogue, with interest in detailed explanations of the build.
Negative: A few critiques arise amidst the overwhelmingly positive feedback. @CEP_0 suggests that considering purchasing different high-performance SUVs would be more sensible, expressing skepticism about the vehicle's cost-effectiveness. Additionally, @startfinish and @Aweh voice concerns over some unanswered questions regarding the build's certifications, potentially impacting the car's perceived value. Although these comments are less numerous, they convey a degree of caution among some potential buyers, reiterating the high stakes involved in such unique builds.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle express enthusiasm and appreciation for its aesthetic appeal and original features. @addictedtojunk notes their affection for classic Honda scramblers, indicating a nostalgic appreciation for the brand and model. @Goedhout praises the bike's appearance and inquires about the original toolkit, showing interest in its completeness and history. @lbasko (The Seller) confirms that the original toolkit is indeed present, further adding to the bike's value and authenticity.
Neutral: Some comments seek clarifications regarding the vehicle's specifications and condition. @XRDV8 asks about rust on the pipes and whether they were originally black, which @lbasko (The Seller) confirms there is no rust and that the pipes were indeed originally black. @MJHOhio questions the title's mileage, to which @lbasko (The Seller) elaborates that the speedometer malfunctioned after the bike was parked, stating the mileage as 8,554, and clarifying the title's condition regarding mileage visibility.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle, as all feedback focuses on its condition, ownership history, and appearance. The inquiries reflect an interest in ensuring the bike's quality, but no detracting comments or concerns are raised about its overall appeal or functionality.
|
49-Years-Family-Owned 1963 Chevrolet Corvette Split-Window Coupe 4-Speed Project
30837S112957
Lot 202728
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its potential as a great daily driver and a sought-after project car. @MartyKC remarked on the car's value, suggesting that fixing the clutch could significantly increase the selling price by leaving tens of thousands of dollars on the table. @neelfryer pointed out that clutch issues or a color change wouldn't greatly affect the auction's outcome, emphasizing that due to the rarity of these cars, it's an exciting project. Overall, there's a consensus that the vehicle is cool to look at and has an interesting history, adding to its allure.
Neutral: Comments from users like @Bmarcum indicated that the car could be an interesting watch for bidders, suggesting simple maintenance like a new clutch could make it driveable. @DougR asked clarifying questions about the gauges and the car's condition, demonstrating a desire for more detailed information while recognizing the car's potential. The presence of original parts was noted by @SupremeDeluxe, who mentioned the original front clip, implying that the car holds its original characteristics which could appeal to collectors.
Negative: Conversely, @sliproc and @AlPalmer10 expressed skepticism regarding the project's classification, suggesting that the car doesn't fit the typical project mold as it was in better condition than what is usually expected for a project car. The concerns over the car's modifications and history were echoed by several commenters, including @LoneStarMotorsports, who questioned the authenticity of the radiator support and previous bodywork. Such comments reflect a cautious approach to the car's sale, with an emphasis on the need for due diligence about its condition and history before bidding.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their excitement about the vehicle, highlighting its appeal and aesthetic upgrades. @JPEngel noted that it is a car many buyers have been anticipating, while @Powrmonger praised the vibrant red accents on the center caps. @redtanrt10 mentioned the impressive modifications made to the 1994 RT/10, suggesting that it significantly enhances performance, estimating it could have around 510hp instead of the stock 400hp. @lunchbocks2002 commented on the owner's evident love for the car and the upgrades that promise an enjoyable and trouble-free driving experience for future owners. @MoparTech86 emphasized the meticulous care and upgrades made to address the common issues faced by Gen 1 Vipers, ensuring that the car is ready to drive without concerns.
Neutral: Some interactions focused on confirming details about the vehicle's features and condition. @PhbViper1994 inquired about the presence of air conditioning, which @Thomas56 (The Seller) confirmed it does not have, stating that this model came without AC, relying instead on fan velocity. The lack of a hardtop was addressed, with @Thomas56 confirming it only has a soft top, which can collapse and fit into the trunk. Additionally, @redtanrt10 pointed out that the original AC unit was absent and discussed personal experiences related to aftermarket AC installations for similar models.
Negative: A few commenters raised concerns regarding the vehicle's features and usability. @PhbViper1994 shared prior experiences indicating that the lack of an AC unit can make the cabin uncomfortably hot, suggesting that an aftermarket unit is necessary. @Kimalden also confirmed the absence of A/C and pointed out the lack of mechanical equipment on the right side of the firewall. Additionally, questions about the mileage and service history were brought up, leading @Thomas56 (The Seller) to clarify the car was not driven extensively in recent years, which may raise some concerns for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's condition and potential, with @Geoff-NS describing it as a well-preserved Sprite. @Highlander63 remarked that it looked like a classic ready for a James Bond movie, which further emphasizes its appeal. @Sherlock praised the seller for delivering an honest presentation. @Jason74 (The Seller) also provided reassuring details about upgrades made to the vehicle, including a modern ignition system and alternator, indicating a level of reliability that may attract potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commentors inquired about specific aspects of the vehicle. @Novowels_59 and @Geoff-NS asked about paint flaws and possible past bodywork, emphasizing the importance of inspecting areas integral to the car's structural integrity. @bobballoo78 brought up concerns about fitting into the vehicle for someone taller, while @Jfreddowns expressed curiosity about a switch that operates the turn signals, suggesting a level of engagement and interest in the vehicle's functionalities. Any repairs and modifications were noted as significant considerations for potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's past and condition. @grz956 claimed the car was a scam sell, while @Novowels_59 mentioned their friend's expert opinion about the extensive monocoque repairs, which could deter buyers concerned about the vehicle's structural integrity. @Britcargeek expressed curiosity about the short ownership timeline and the absence of original components like the steel rims and steering wheel, suggesting potential issues with trust or transparency in the sale process. This ambiguity could influence buyer confidence negatively.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @Hsuding, has shown a willingness to engage with potential buyers and appreciate feedback on the vehicle. This interaction creates a sense of transparency and trust, as he acknowledges the comments made by others and addresses their concerns directly. For example, he expresses gratitude for feedback regarding the frame's condition and the undercoating application process.
Neutral: Several commenters have pointed out discrepancies in the description of the vehicle, such as @arusso97 inquiring about the same mileage since 2023 and @GP65 noting that the tires, claimed to be new, are actually from 2016. @overlandish highlighted the need for better preparation before applying the coating on the frame, and @Vickd9 mentioned the availability of earlier auction pictures, which shows that potential buyers are seeking more information and clarity about the vehicle's current state.
Negative: There are concerns from various commenters about the condition and descriptions of the vehicle that raise red flags. @overlandish specifically mentioned shock over the frame's cleaning prior to coating, indicating potential issues with the vehicle’s maintenance. Additionally, @GP65 pointed out a miscommunication regarding the tires, which could lead to distrust among bidders if not resolved adequately. @Hsuding acknowledged these mistakes and expressed intent to correct the misinformation, but the initial discrepancies might negatively impact bidder confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @RedRon expressed admiration for the bike's beauty and praised the seller for a fantastic restoration job, stating 'Hat’s off to you.' @Thereddevil and @ssterry both called the bike very nice and beautiful, reflecting a general aesthetic appreciation within the comments. @Boogie33, having previously purchased from the seller, expressed strong satisfaction with their past experience and willingness to do business again. Other commenters like @bikebuyer reminisced about their own past ownership, noting that they never thought they would see a similar bike again, reinforcing the nostalgic value of the vehicle.
Neutral: @ccorato, the seller, actively engaged with the comments, providing answers to questions and sharing details about the motorcycle's status and parts. For instance, the seller clarified the engine condition and noted it has no modifications. @LADODSON asked for local shop recommendations for their Kawasaki, while @Amazonjohnny inquired about engine specifications. These exchanges indicate a platform for prospective buyers to gather helpful information regarding the motorcycle and its maintenance.
Negative: On the downside, @motcat raised concerns regarding the accuracy and honesty of the engine's rebuild and restoration description, suggesting that simply vapor blasting the engine does not account for a true overhaul. This sparked additional debate about the practices involved in the restoration. @Rojofro echoed this sentiment, seeking clarification on the completeness of the restoration work. The discussion hints at skepticism about the extent of the restoration quality, with @motcat asserting that simply reassembling all old internal parts does not qualify as an overhaul, creating a potentially negative impression on some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous commenters praise the vehicle for its outstanding condition and meticulous build quality. @lusciouspear remarks that it is "absolutely beautiful," while @edlew notes it is a "superb build" and in "excellent condition." Enthusiasts like @TulsawaggyFJ appreciate the craftsmanship and express nostalgia for their previous ownership of similar models. @Hamster_R35 calls it "one of the cleanest" Z32s they've seen, indicating the high standard of maintenance it has received. Overall, the consensus among viewers highlights the car's impressive presentation, extensive upgrades, and its appeal within the Z community.
Neutral: Commenters have shared a mix of curiosity and inquiries regarding specific aspects of the car. For instance, @vorpal asks about the modifications made to the engine and transmission, while @louiselnino seeks clarification on the badge associated with the car. Some users mention historical aspects, such as the unique features of different model years, with @factoryspirit offering insights into the production background of Z32 vehicles. Many acknowledge the rarity of this particular model, contributing to its allure for bidders, but focus less on emotional reactions and more on factual details.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming positivity surrounding the vehicle, there are a few critical comments. @taarzen, a newcomer to the discussion, makes a non-constructive remark that is quickly dismissed by @Narbeh (The Seller), who defends the quality and authenticity of the car's presentation. Additionally, concerns about the cost of maintenance for Z32 models are voiced by @zdoctor, who mentions anxiety over ownership expenses. Such comments hint at typical apprehensions potential buyers may have when considering older performance vehicles, despite the seller's assurances about the car's superb condition.
|
 |
Positive: @NormalNorm described the vehicles as a beautiful pair, indicating a strong visual appeal. @MonteCutlass referred to them as great for summer camp, suggesting their utility for recreational purposes. @analogautosport expressed that the bikes are fabulous fun machines that can be ridden easily by anyone, highlighting their user-friendliness and enjoyable riding experience. @RetroMotoNW (The Seller) welcomed participants to the no reserve auction and shared that the bikes have stayed together since new, emphasizing their unique history and connection.
Neutral: @RetroMotoNW (The Seller) explained the features of the bikes, noting that they are semi-automatic and easy to ride, which may attract a wide range of potential bidders who could appreciate their accessibility. @NormalNorm inquired if the bikes were restored or original, showing interest in their condition but also indicating a level of curiosity about their authenticity. @onlyhonda4me jokingly mentioned the expectation of receiving Doublemint gum with the purchase, lightening the mood while engaging in the conversation.
Negative: @NormalNorm raised a concern or doubt regarding whether the bikes were restored or as found, which implies that he may be questioning their condition or authenticity. There are no strong negative comments about the vehicle; most interactions leaned towards positive feedback or neutral inquiries. Overall, the comments remain largely complimentary with minimal criticism.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle, indicating its high value and desirability. @StephenBell remarked on the expectation that the car is going to sell for a significant amount, while @collectiveauto, the seller, welcomed participants to the auction and described the car's excellent condition and special features, including paint protection, new tires, and unique components. Users like @farragut complimented the car's beauty and shared interest in unique engine components, which shows a strong appreciation for the car's engineering and aesthetics.
Neutral: There were various inquiries and discussions about specific details related to the vehicle, reflecting a neutral stance while seeking clarity. @commanderthrawn pointed out a discrepancy in the mileage listed, which prompted @bringatrailer to confirm that the listing was corrected. Additionally, @TommyK1111 asked about the Aero Package, showing interest in the vehicle's specifications, and the seller provided clarifications on modifications and additional parts that came with the car, including potential financing options for interested buyers.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about inconsistencies in the listing details, particularly around the car's mileage, which was noted by both @commanderthrawn and @presidentofspace. Additionally, @BLZKRG mentioned the absence of the longer version of the aerodynamic package, which could deter potential buyers looking for a fully spec’d vehicle. Overall, while the vehicle garnered much interest, these discrepancies may affect potential bidders' confidence in the auction process.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciated the vehicle's performance and value, highlighting its incredible handling and presence. @AZkid described their experience with the AMG GTR as utterly staggering, emphasizing its track readiness and the deep, satisfying exhaust sound. @Tinknocker echoed these sentiments, stating that the car is smooth and handles exceptionally well, suggesting that future buyers would be very happy with their purchase. The seller, @aaronkirkpatrick, reinforced these claims by stating that the car truly offers a thrilling driving experience and will likely be valued highly in the future.
Neutral: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's history and current condition, particularly regarding a reported accident and mileage discrepancies noted on the Carfax. @JayKaySmith prompted the seller for clarification on these issues, while @JLeeT provided details about the fluctuating mileage entries that raised questions. The seller responded to these concerns by assuring that the issues were being addressed and clarified that the discrepancies were likely due to dealer error or miscommunication.
Negative: Several comments pointed out significant apprehensions regarding the accuracy of the Carfax report and the implications of the vehicle's accident history. @MPal expressed skepticism about the potential impact of these issues on resale value and the overall appeal of the car. Questions about the condition of the car, especially the engine bay appearance and the appropriateness of winter tires on a high-performance model, added to the worries. @MV43 sought further details on the damage classification from Carfax, indicating ongoing concerns about transparency around the vehicle's past.
|
 |
Positive: @alfaSS complimented the vehicle, simply stating, "Nice!" @Andrew appreciated the design and craftsmanship of Italian cars, noting how his admiration made him and a friend sit silently in awe of their beauty. @Nic55 referred to the car as a "great little sleeper" and acknowledged the efforts that went into its restoration.
Neutral: @alfadoc pointed out that the 750 Veloce register indicated the car's last known sighting was in 2012 but also noted that it appeared well cared for. @Watry referenced historical details, suggesting the car was built in March 1960 according to Veloce Register numbers. @HKMotorcars (The Seller) provided insights into the auction and restoration details, mentioning it's a "transition" model with significant upgrades done to enhance performance.
Negative: @Slapshifter criticized the authenticity of the transmission and engine, stating that they are not 750 series parts. @bsc asked for the engine number of the removed 1.3L engine, implying it may still possess elements of the 750 Veloce despite its later body style. @sjtm requested pictures of the undercarriage, hinting at a concern for the vehicle's condition beneath the surface.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the car's unique color combination and overall aesthetic, suggesting that the custom brown repaint was executed with high standards. @AiDesignNY mentioned that the car presents beautifully, which several community members, including @Infrared_Gradient and @nexusautobrokers, echoed by highlighting the appeal of the manual V12 configuration. Commenters like @ArtVandelay2 and @hisstory also appreciated the craftsmanship behind the repaint, with some noting a preference for the current look over the original orange. Enthusiasts of the V12 Vantage commented on its rarity and performance , indicating a strong interest despite concerns regarding its history.
Neutral: Comments from the seller, @AiDesignNY, provide details about the car's ownership history, claiming it has had only one previous owner since the incident that required a rear-end repair twelve years ago. Others inquired about documentation related to the repairs and maintenance records; @Red99 specifically asked for the original window sticker. Some users noted that although the car has low mileage, its long-term storage poses potential mechanical concerns. General queries about the car's service history suggest a desire for more transparency around any maintenance performed, helping potential buyers gauge the car's condition.
Negative: The discussion surrounding the vehicle was rife with skepticism and concerns regarding its condition and history. Many commenters, including @drstrizz2514 and @Caffeinated25, noted the absence of documentation for the repaint and repairs, raising alarms about potential hidden issues. @drstrizz2514 detailed worries over structural damage and the implications of the car's history, while others like @LenV12 echoed these sentiments, stressing the necessity of a thorough pre-purchase inspection. Overall, the consensus among some bidders is that without a clear understanding of the car's past and condition, they would remain cautious, and the potential lack of maintenance records was a serious concern that could greatly affect the car's value.
|
1997 Ford F-350 XLT Crew Cab Power Stroke Dually w/28′ Silver Eagle Trailer
1FTJW35F2VEC55843
Lot 202822
Private Party
 |
Positive: @GBRBiLL expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting it was exactly what he was looking for despite the distance. @It's_Bill (The Seller) detailed the vehicle's impressive capabilities and comfort, emphasizing that it is a well-maintained, classic towing rig ready for long journeys. Further praise came from @cad58Y, highlighting the high-quality nature of the trailer and its premium specifications, asserting that the cost to replace such a trailer would exceed $30,000 while the truck, valued at over $100,000, remains in excellent condition.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made by potential buyers such as @gb70, who asked for measurements of the vehicle, and @jeffj1959, who was interested in the largest vehicle that could be towed. @Its_Bill consistently provided detailed responses regarding dimensions, capacity, and trailer specifications, affirming the high quality of the rig and sharing historical anecdotes about its previous owner, Joel Finn. Questions about the vehicle's condition, such as the presence of odd interior smells and whether it had ever been smoked in, were also addressed, with the seller confidently stating that the truck was odor-free and in excellent road-worthy condition.
Negative: There were some minor criticisms about the listing details. @Wildmanbill57 pointed out a discrepancy regarding the hitch type, clarifying it was a gooseneck rather than a 5th wheel, which @It's_Bill acknowledged. Additionally, @C.Flint noted a potential discrepancy in the mileage reported for maintenance, prompting @It's_Bill to clarify and correct details about the oil change and inspection records. @Dinks mentioned small dinks and paint chips on the body, highlighting concern about the vehicle's cosmetic imperfections, although @It's_Bill assured that they were minimal and manageable.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, with @drewkellar noting its cleanliness and low mileage, which is considered rare. @jonnn42 highlighted the originality and low mileage as remarkable, while @adnimports shared fond memories of having owned a similar car, calling it super fun. @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 praised the car's beauty and urged others to preserve its condition, with several others echoing this sentiment. @405motoring, the seller, emphasized the vehicle's mint condition and eagerness to assist potential buyers, which resonated well with the commenters who praised the seller’s professionalism and dedication to customer service.
Neutral: Many commentators shared useful inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @FlatWorld23 inquired about rust, while @forbiddenmotorsports asked for a vehicle history report to verify mileage. @jasonH88 showed interest in additional photos of the car's underside, which @405motoring quickly provided, confirming the vehicle's excellent condition. Comments also mentioned the car's potential legal status in California. Overall, the comments reflect a mix of eagerness and practical concerns surrounding the vehicle's sale.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, some commenters expressed concerns about the vehicle's future. @mdavis500 lamented that the car, despite its pristine condition, might end up modified for racing purposes, detracting from its original beauty. @FlatWorld23 pointed out the rough condition of the tires and questioned why they have not been replaced, considering the vehicle's overall cleanliness. There seems to be a fear that this precious car might be misused or not taken care of properly as it goes into new ownership.
|
 |
Positive: @Aceofclassiccars shared that acquiring this car was a rewarding experience, especially with his sons, and he looks forward to engaging with potential buyers. @70GTO455HO praised the color of the car as the best GTO color ever and mentioned having an all-original model that could serve as a reference for those looking to create a Judge tribute. @2caddiesandaMach1 emphasized that the car appears solid for its age, with a quality paint job and good interior, making it a practical choice for cruising down to local drive-ins with family.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions about the car's specifications, with @1035kmiller1 inquiring about the original engine code and suggesting the seller provide driving videos. @Nutzandboltz and @Dickiee asked for photos of the undercarriage and trunk floor without carpet, voicing concerns about potential rust. @Aceofclassiccars reassured everyone that the original motor was present, provided additional photos, and uploaded cold start and driving videos to demonstrate the car's functionality, which some felt improved its selling prospects.
Negative: Criticism surfaced regarding various aspects of the car's presentation and its authenticity, with @TonyGto noting the need for a proper GTO bumper to match the tribute theme. @herecomesthejudge expressed disappointment with the use of a chrome bumper instead of more accurate features, while @JosCherry claimed evidence proving the engine was not original. @Dickiee and @Nutzandboltz conveyed skepticism about the car's condition, raising concerns over the lack of responses to buyer inquiries and potential undisclosed issues, arguing that the risk of inconsistency was high without proper verification of its running status.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the beauty, rarity, and overall elegance of the 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300D. @Dollycat3 calls it a wonderful, rare model with a beautiful color combination, and others express admiration for its originality and elegance. @Luz_do_sol describes it as a true survivor; appreciating its history and originality without significant rust. Several commenters, including @whipcity76 and @Jgrahamdmd, find the vehicle a great candidate for refurbishment, noting its luxurious features and potential for preservation. The sense of nostalgia is prominent, with people sharing fond memories related to the model, reflecting a deep appreciation for its legacy and craftsmanship.
Neutral: Commenters provided various insights about the vehicle's specifications and historical context. References were made to the car's lineage, such as its engineering behind the existing models. @gregorylv pointed out its relatively high price at release, hinting at its place among luxury vehicles of the time. There were discussions regarding the engine and its variations, with @pmt99 emphasizing the family's connection to the 300D and sharing technical knowledge about the engine's design. @Luz_do_sol elaborated on the history of the 300 lineup, adding significant details about its evolution and features over the years, contributing to a richer understanding of the model.
Negative: While the majority of comments were positive or neutral, there were concerns regarding the car's maintenance and potential rust issues. @whipcity76 pondered the upkeep of such a classic vehicle, suggesting an evaluation of the engine oil pressure indicated in the driving video. @Jgrahamdmd expressed uncertainty about the oil pressure reading during a video demonstration, creating some doubts but also offering constructive advice. There was some debate over engine history, with @pmt99 feeling frustrated by misunderstandings about the engine's design lineage, indicating a need for clarity among commenters about the vehicle's specifications.
|
 |
Positive: @jhambach noted that they own another example and expressed confidence that any purchaser would enjoy this vehicle, wishing good luck with the auction. @nanotech remarked on the impressive cleanliness of the car given its mileage, indicating a potential visit. @Sarki praised its classic styling and performance, sharing their regret from having previously sold a similar model, while @zzracing expressed interest in a driving video to bolster their desire to purchase. Overall, the comments reflect a strong appreciation for the unique qualities of this vehicle and its appeal to collectors and enthusiasts alike.
Neutral: Several inquiries about the car's mechanical specifications and features were made, with @Ecosse asking about the M030 suspension and @bplein clarifying the suspension differences between models. @mirthrander provided guidance on the required DOT sticker for U.S. importation, and @Doc1965 questioned the front license plate holder's removal implications. Meanwhile, @jnkpro12 and @Guitarded discussed import tariffs and the car's sales history in Canada, revealing varied perspectives on the complexities and details concerning this model.
Negative: @Rat70fj raised a concern about the wear on the sport seats compared to comfort seats, suggesting this could be a downside for potential buyers. @ohshum specifically requested a photo of the seat tear. @jnkpro12 and @Guitarded also pointed out potential issues related to tariffs and incorrect emblem placement, respectively, which might influence the perception of the car. The conversation around these issues suggests that while the vehicle is appreciated, there are some concerns regarding condition and regulatory aspects that may affect interest.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its appealing aspects. For instance, @highspeedwithalottadrag mentioned that the car looked 'real nice!' and asked about features like the soft top and cruise control. @SunValleyAutos (The Seller) addressed these inquiries promptly, assuring potential buyers that the cruise control buttons were indeed present. Additionally, @DLegeai's curiosity regarding the low mileage and number of owners indicates a positive perception of the vehicle's condition and usage.
Neutral: There were inquiries about specific features and conditions of the vehicle that show a genuine interest while not being overly critical. @435WAPES asked if there were any pictures available with the hardtop removed, indicating a thoughtful consideration for potential buyers. @DLegeai's question about the number of owners and the vehicle's low mileage reflects curiosity that might be typical among buyers evaluating a used vehicle, suggesting he sees merit in the car's history.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle that could be seen as red flags. @lucky12345678910 pointed out what appeared to be poorly painted wheels, which suggests a lack of attention to detail that may concern buyers. Additionally, @highspeedwithalottadrag noted potential corrosion and questioned the weatherstripping around the windshield, suggesting these issues could impact the perception of the vehicle's condition. The acknowledgment of existing corrosion has been deemed significant by the commenter, comparing it to local standards of a 'rust-free' vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous comments express admiration for the unique design and performance of this RWB modified Porsche 911 Turbo. @jsilver212 exclaims, "Ho-ly moly. Absolutely sick," while @boaboyoz calls it a "bodacious RWB 964 Turbo" and @MLINKK describes it as an "absolutely gorgeous spec." Many users unanimously appreciate the appealing wrap, with @Charleetuner stating, "RWB hips are intoxicating," and @tlcamg noting that the cover shot of the car brightened their day. The overall sentiment regarding the car's aesthetic and performance is overwhelmingly positive, indicating its desirability among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Some comments focus on the technical aspects of the vehicle and its modifications. @galevin wonders if the car is strictly for racing and prefers previous decals, while @bfb1963 asks about the engine management system. The @2FAM seller responds that it runs on a TEC GT system and that the car can easily be used as a street vehicle without issues. Inquiries about the history of wraps and paint preservation also highlight a balanced interest in the car's condition and modifications, reflecting a mix of curiosity and informative exchange in the comments.
Negative: There are mixed feelings concerning the wrap itself, with @Porsche1931 commenting on their dilemma of finding it cool or weird. @Mike_Breinin compares it to "dazzle camouflage" and @BloodyHell likens it to the testing wraps used to obscure vehicles from the public eye. Some commenters, like @OutOfMyElement, are less impressed, stating it's "too subtle" for their taste. Additionally, @Mandinga admits to experiencing vertigo from its appearance, showcasing that not every viewer finds the vehicle appealing, leading to some skepticism in the overall conversation.
|
 |
Positive: @diltperns praises the vehicle as a beautiful Cayenne, asserting it is among the best-looking diesels ever listed on BAT. @Chuckles28 comments on the successful sale with a 'knockout bid' indicating high interest in the vehicle. @laker1304 shares their personal experience with diesel performance, highlighting the impressive fuel economy when driven optimally, along with mentioning the remarkable polish of the vehicle, which @genevamotorcars (The Seller) confirms was achieved through paint correction.
Neutral: @rmurphy1990 poses a question regarding fuel economy, eager to know the details of the vehicle's performance. @DanD04 inquires about the Diesel Gate warranty, suggesting potential buyers are considering coverage options. @porkylogan asks for specific photos of the vehicle's undercarriage while @enjoyftw wants to understand the condition of the transfer case and if there are any present issues, demonstrating interest and diligence in assessing the car's condition.
Negative: @Big450 raises concerns about whether there is a wiring harness for the hitch, hoping to ensure compatibility. @Darkness questions the details surrounding airbag replacement, implying concern due to a potential deployment, though @genevamotorcars (The Seller) clarifies that it stems from a recall and was never deployed. @1NVICTUS expresses confusion regarding the addition of OEM roof rails or racks, indicating uncertainty about the vehicle's customization options.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's build and restoration quality. @Craven and @39mercman were particularly impressed with the car's performance and aesthetics, praising its power and tasteful upgrades. @scscarborough called it beautiful and described it as better than new, while @ck1951 highlighted the incredible detail and execution of the modifications. Commenters like @denny6.53 and @BillSundin noted that the modifications make the rare car more practical for modern use, enhancing its drivability. @Dollycat3 and @Rockabillykid also appreciated the balance of classic style with updated performance features, further underscoring the car's appeal as a noteworthy automotive piece.
Neutral: Some commenters provided constructive observations and inquiries regarding the vehicle's technical aspects. @confer62 asked whether all the gauges were functioning post-upgrade, and @mbheritage (the seller) confirmed details about the vehicle's specifications and functionality. Several users expressed nostalgia and personal connections to similar models, like @jsully, who noted a satisfying driving experience. Others, like @jsebby, shared their fondness for classic cars in general, comparing this model to their own vehicles, which fostered a sense of community and shared enthusiasm among bidders.
Negative: Criticism arose regarding the decision to modify such a rare vehicle, with comments from @au94 and @extratall questioning the necessity of altering the original design. @ryanmh1 presented a contrarian view suggesting that the wheels and tires might detract from the car's appeal, arguing that this could affect its bidding potential. @Dollycat3 noted the design challenges of the vehicle’s distinctive grille, which received a mix of admiration and critique regarding its complexity. Some commenters expressed concern about whether the mods would satisfy purist collectors, further indicating a divide among classic car enthusiasts.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express a deep admiration for the 1957 Ranchero, with many highlighting its stunning aesthetics and classic build. @boaboyoz praises the vehicle's beautiful build and immediately wishes the seller good luck with the auction. @bosshoss3406pack shares their enthusiasm for the Ranchero, dreaming of a complete set of '57 Ford models. @Raffi describes the car's appealing color combination and unique features, emphasizing the importance of preserving such classic vehicles for future generations.
Neutral: Several commenters reflect on personal stories associated with classic Fords. @Dollycat3 shares nostalgic memories related to a family road trip in a '57 Country Squire, linking it to cherished life experiences. @Ken_Buchanan reminisces about the Ranchero’s popularity among motorcycle racers and recalls a fast variant owned by a family member, offering insight into the vehicle's cultural significance at the time. These reflections showcase the emotional connections people have with these classic cars.
Negative: There are a few inquiries about the car's condition, which introduce some concerns. @slpearson6 asks whether the air conditioning is functional and if there are any known issues with the drivetrain, brakes, or suspension. The seller, @knofun, reassures that the Classic Auto Air under-dash A/C is working and reports no known issues with the drivetrain, brakes, or suspension, addressing the concerns. However, @slpearson6 later asks for more information on engine specifications and any rebuild history, highlighting a potential gap in information about the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @carsfromafar (The Seller) emphasizes the exceptional condition of the truck, highlighting its clean underbody and fantastic frame. The seller assures potential buyers that there has been significant demand for a diesel, 4wd Toyota ToyoAce/Dyna with an automatic, and notes the included AC as a major plus. Furthermore, he offers reassurance regarding the air conditioning, stating that it is extremely cold and has been effective even in high temperatures. Many comments show appreciation for the spacious bed, with detailed dimensions provided, confirming it is over 10 feet long with no intrusions, making it highly suitable for cargo.
Neutral: Several questions about the vehicle's specifications come from interested parties. @NebraskaJeepster inquires about the lack of cruise control, while @Hunterwally raises questions about the type of transmission and hitch availability. @maiken seeks clarification about registration and insurance status, and @DMDDriver asks about the functionality of toggle switches in the truck. @7Iron expresses concern about the absence of visible anchor points in the truck's bed, seeking confirmation from the seller about that aspect.
Negative: Despite the truck's overall positive reception, some concerns are raised regarding practicalities and regulations. @Docfarmer expresses disappointment about the challenges of registering the vehicle in California, indicating the bureaucratic hurdles that accompany such a process. This sentiment of frustration is echoed by @DMDDriver, who questions the truck's rust condition and expresses a sense of urgency in ensuring everything is in order before making a purchase. Additionally, @maiken shows uncertainty regarding the vehicle's insurance, implying potential anxieties about the truck's compliance and usability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm about the vehicle, with @Just_me noting that it must be fun to drive with the 1275 engine, highlighting it as a source of great enjoyment. @stanela (The Seller) confirms this, emphasizing the car's ability to deliver smiles per mile, indicating a positive driving experience. Additionally, @Uncle_Jake admires the vehicle's beauty, suggesting it would be even more desirable were it not a right-hand drive, while @19Willys46 counters that the right-hand drive is actually a beneficial feature.
Neutral: There are technical inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifications. @JGLcars raises a question about the electrical system, inquiring whether the vehicle is still positive earth, to which @stanela (The Seller) is willing to check and respond. Furthermore, @Stevsgarage provides a detailed observation about the vehicle’s shell, suggesting it seems to be taken from a rubber bumper car and offering thoughts on engine removal and sway bar installation, which shows an interest in the vehicle’s mechanical aspects without strong emotional bias.
Negative: Some concerns about the vehicle’s history have been raised, particularly by @JohnnyLoophole, who questions why the vehicle was withdrawn previously and whether those issues have been addressed. @stanela (The Seller) responds by clarifying that the car was withdrawn to investigate comments about the shell being changed and confirms that it has indeed been re-bodied, which was previously a concern among bidders. This acknowledgment of the vehicle's past could raise potential red flags for some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Overall, buyers have expressed appreciation for the vehicle's features and condition. @sandeautogroup promptly responded to inquiries about the car's specifications, confirming that the rear seats fold down, it comes with XM radio capability, and includes both keys. @Uby67vw1958 thanked the seller for their quick response, indicating a positive customer service experience. Additionally, @sandeautogroup reassured potential buyers about the car's driving performance, stating it is in perfect working order and highlighting that none of the accessories are malfunctioning.
Neutral: The vehicle's details have been discussed with potential buyers, including specifics about the delivery date, model, and options installed. For instance, @newcarpro provided additional background information about the car's build, weight, delivery type, and warranty status, outlining that it is a 2011 HHR LS utility vehicle. The seller also shared the condition of the vehicle, mentioning minor scuffs on the bumpers without further explanation of the damage, indicating an honest approach to transparency.
Negative: There are inquiries expressing concern about the previous condition of the vehicle, particularly regarding the bumpers. @ronsstuff specifically asked about what kind of damage had occurred, showing an interest in the car's past despite the seller's assurance that the damage was minor and that all systems function correctly. This suggests some buyers may need more reassurance about the vehicle's past incidents before proceeding with a purchase.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its remarkable condition and original paint. @Popovich described it as 'Very Nice,' while @Motogrotto highlighted its original paint and low mileage. @Vetdawg shared their positive experiences with similar BMW bikes, praising their reliability and maintenance ease. Others like @Ant5842 aggressively promoted the model, emphasizing its comfort on various terrains and vowing never to sell their bikes again.
Neutral: Several commenters posed questions regarding the vehicle's features and history. @h.nasti inquired whether the bike had been repainted or if decals were removed, and @willy asked about the speakers and any recent service history. @millerbenjammin (The Seller) responded to these inquiries with details about the bike's maintenance, including a recent oil change and confirmed the hook-up of speakers via Bluetooth. The seller also promised to provide additional photos of the tank and tire date codes to address potential concerns.
Negative: While most comments were positive or neutral, there were some concerns regarding the bike's condition and features. @willy questioned the speakers' wiring and the seller's ability to provide thorough information. Additionally, the mention of the tank badge decal peeling raised doubts about the bike’s pristine condition. @millerbenjammin (The Seller) acknowledged the wear but assured that the bike was in overall good shape, indicating that potential buyers need to consider minor cosmetic details.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praised the Spartan Manor's beautiful layout, finishes, and its serene ambiance for quality quiet time. @aljodo mentioned a preference for Spartan models, finding them superior to Airstreams. @carriagemotor and @gdnorrie echoed similar admiration for the stunning interior and overall beauty of the vehicle. Additionally, @hr47cars and @Robmaden19 appreciated its design as a potential camping rig or artist studio, showcasing its versatility and charm.
Neutral: @Russell_Boston pointed out a detail about the model year, noting it likely isn't a 1946 due to the rubber gaskets in the front windows, although he deemed it a minor issue. @ThisIsSpartan (The Seller) confirmed the registration paperwork indicating 1946 and addressed questions about holding tank sizes and the readiness for adventure, explaining what it would take to make the trailer completely move-in ready. Other commenters, such as @knotleykcorb and @NavyDave, asked for further specifications like tank sizes and dimensions, reflecting a common interest in practical details.
Negative: @Canadansk1 expressed skepticism about the weight of the trailer, which @ThisIsSpartan clarified was around 4000 lbs, noting that newer builds tend to be heavier. @dp48472 raised concerns regarding holding tank clearance and its positioning under the trailer, prompting further clarification from the seller. @funknyuyao invited comments about winter use and potential freezing issues, indicating some apprehension about the practicality of year-round use.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments reflect positively on the vehicle being listed for sale. @Emil21 (The Seller) provides reassurance that most maintenance has been done at the dealership, which should be evident in the Carfax report. With only 28,000 miles, the car has had regular servicing, including oil changes and brake pad replacements. @Emil21 also confirms that the convertible top operates well and promises to provide a video demonstration. Additionally, the seller maintains that there are no issues with the wiring harness, and all interior electronic functions are reported to work properly, adding to the overall appeal of the vehicle.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding various aspects of the vehicle that require clarification. @MMike questions the need for a quick sale, to which @Emil21 responds about the urgency due to personal priorities. @Porsche11s asks about potential damages to the driver side outside mirror, revealing corrosion, but @Emil21 reassures that it does not affect its function. There are also questions about the convertible top's functionality and the state of paint on the hood, both of which @Emil21 addresses, stating that while the insulating hood pad is missing, the paint is still in good condition and the top works effectively.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about potential issues or missing features of the vehicle. @Ondeamo points out the lack of an insulating hood pad, which raises questions about the condition of the hood's paint. Additionally, @tmcleod3 raises a series of detailed inquiries regarding the vehicle's mechanical systems, such as signs of seepage and the condition of various seals, indicating that some buyers are skeptical about the vehicle's overall condition given its age and mileage. Despite @Emil21's assurances of no major issues, these inquiries suggest potential doubts on the part of interested buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a generally high regard for the vehicle, with @IslandTeal stating it is "Very Nice" and suggesting it should sell for a premium price. There's acknowledgment of the rarity of the truck type, with @MPETESS10 calling it an "odd, rare truck," which indicates a distinctive appeal to collectors or enthusiasts. In addition, the seller, @Elkhornauto, actively engages with potential buyers, offering assistance and facilitating transparency, which enhances buyer confidence.
Neutral: Several participants focused on the specifics of the vehicle's delivery and specifications. @newcarpro shared detailed delivery information and vehicle options, emphasizing the unique features such as the Quadasteer trim that could intrigue potential buyers. Additionally, there is discussion among users about the originality and intent behind the vehicle's order, with comments reflecting curiosity regarding whether it was a mis-order and the implications of that.
Negative: Conversely, the comments also highlight some skepticism and confusion. @BabyD69 questioned whether the truck can actually perform better compared to a similar vehicle, hinting at a competitive marketplace. @GasTurbine remarked on the irony of the extended cab designation, suggesting a potential oversight. Furthermore, @dhub24 raised a query about the truck being noted as black on the Carfax report, indicating doubts about the vehicle's presentation or history.
|
 |
Positive: @Davidch1974 mentioned that there is no tire rub with the current setup and that the vehicle has brand new tires, which suggests a well-maintained condition of the vehicle.
Neutral: @Cjjarrett questioned the quick turnaround on the sale, while @ScottLopez humorously commented on the challenges of driving a stick shift left-handed when one is right-handed. @Cjjarrett acknowledged the adaptation process. @Mr_Chubbs shared his experience of transitioning from driving right-handed stick shifts to left-handed ones, indicating that it is surprisingly easy due to the brain's adaptability.
Negative: No negative comments were noted regarding the vehicle or the selling process.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as 'dynamite in white' and expresses excitement over its aesthetics. @C4HotRods, the seller, indicates that the exhaust sound represented in the video closely matches the actual experience, noting the use of Purple Hornies exhausts which enhances the car's performance and character.
Neutral: @Moparmanbet inquires about the exhaust, wanting to hear more about it. In response, @C4HotRods confirms that the exhaust sound is accurately depicted in video footage, providing insight into its engineering. Furthermore, @C4HotRods shares a link to the shop's website for those interested in the team behind the car's custom build.
Negative: @BPOTBAM raises concerns about the accuracy of the speedometer, questioning if it is calibrated correctly given the tire size. @C4HotRods admits that the speedometer is off by 10 mph and acknowledges the need for adjustment, noting it shows a speed of 60 when the actual speed is significantly different. This issue reflects ongoing adjustments required after the vehicle's recent upgrade.
|
 |
Positive: Overall, the seller @Reconjr provides timely and detailed responses to potential buyers. They promptly shared photos of the vehicle's underside and reassured @mdezee56 about the timing chain, indicating it is not a common failure point. Furthermore, @Reconjr confirmed that the A/C works well, which is a significant positive factor for interested parties like @lsumharper. The seller also answered dimensional inquiries from @jcolew with specific measurements, demonstrating a commitment to transparency.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a need for additional information on the vehicle's maintenance history. @mdezee56 asked for the approximate date of the timing belt or chain replacement, while @lsumharper inquired further about the condition of the radio and A/C. @JohnMichael1 shares personal experience with a similar vehicle, indicating interest in this one and considering preventative maintenance for the head replacement if necessary. These inquiries are typical when evaluating a used vehicle's condition and reliability.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the vehicle's maintenance. @mdezee56 expressed uncertainty about the timing chain replacement due to the lack of records. Additionally, @JohnMichael1 mentioned previous issues related to overheating in similar models, which might raise red flags for potential buyers. The implication that the radio is limited to Japan frequencies also hints at a potential extra cost for a replacement, which might deter some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Route71S describes the vehicle as beautiful with low mileage, highlighting its gorgeous appearance. @boaboyoz agrees, calling the 930 Turbo coupe 'bad a$' in black and expressing enthusiasm about the auction. The Seller, @C8CORVETTE, emphasizes the car's concourse quality and details the extensive care taken during its long storage, including a full engine service and a recent ceramic coating, presenting a well-maintained vehicle with 16,000 original miles that looks and runs as if it just left the factory.
Neutral: Several commenters seek more information on the car's service history and authenticity. @Midmich60 questions whether there is maintenance documentation available to support the low mileage claims. @1995Z28LT1 asks for receipts concerning the engine work performed and details about the ceramic coating, while also noting that the paint thickness readings seem unusually high for a Porsche. @C8CORVETTE reassures potential buyers by providing insights on the paint thickness and welcoming inspections from personal mechanics.
Negative: There are concerns raised by commentators about the lack of documentation and specific details regarding the vehicle's history. @C8CORVETTE admits the absence of the original window sticker, which may affect collector interest. @1995Z28LT1 expresses skepticism regarding the paint thickness readings compared to typical standards for Porsches, and @gumshoe3000 inquires about necessary modifications to pass California smog requirements, indicating potential hurdles for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @rmorin49 describes the car as beautiful, while @CKart expresses enthusiasm for seeing more big sedans in the future. @dlbuffalo also finds the vehicle gorgeous, highlighting concerns about being the fifth owner of a nine-year-old car. Additionally, @maverickster appreciates this as another beautiful offering from @genevamotorcars and inquires about a driving video, to which @genevamotorcars responds positively by providing a road test video.
Neutral: @SOBEjet points out a potential issue with the dash leather and shares insights about a common manufacturing defect in BMWs, but acknowledges that the cars are lovely. @genevamotorcars addresses @SOBEjet's concern by clarifying that the leather is not coming up, although it does have a contour, and provides closer pictures. Furthermore, @genevamotorcars reassures @Worldbook regarding previous service warnings and confirms that the car has been taken care of since the photos were taken, emphasizing its readiness for sale.
Negative: @Worldbook raises alarms about service warnings displayed on the car's screen and mentions visible issues with the dashboard leather, suggesting these could be indicative of larger problems. @SOBEjet similarly voices concerns about the potential high cost of dashboard repairs due to the common defect in many BMW models. @tjsnyder questions if there are any signs of previous rear-end collision repairs, indicating a worry about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express strong enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its rarity and performance. @GLWA calls it a "great car," and @sunks000 uses a fire emoji to convey excitement. @Theclutch notes a desire for more color variety in auctions but appreciates the model. @m_ericks admires the 997.2 GTS as a sweet spot in terms of performance, while @Sia21 enthusiastically shares that their own experience with a 997.2 GTS has been overwhelmingly positive, describing it as an "absolute BEAST." Additionally, @tajsport emphasizes the unique combination of GTS, RWD, and manual transmission in this model as a valuable feature.
Neutral: The seller, @OTSandCo, provides detailed information about the car, emphasizing its specifications and condition. They mention that the GTS is a good daily driver compared to the more intense 997 GT3, explaining the balance between performance and livability. @Majoma raises questions about the car's standard features, including the sport steering wheel, demonstrating engagement in the conversation. Several commenters inquire about maintenance records and specifics, with @003PDL asking about paint meter readings and @spring2020 inquiring about the original exhaust and steering wheel features. @Corbin12 and @Slave2gravity highlight aspects of the driving video, noting its rarity and quality.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns or request clarification on specific details. @Iceman60467 asks about transmission oil and other maintenance specifics, indicating potential worries about the car's upkeep. @Bha33 queries the removal of the black shark fins, showing concern over potential damage to the original paint. @997gts mentions previous ownership and offers to look for documentation on service work but indicates being overseas, suggesting potential uncertainty. @Brax2u points out that the car's specifications might not align with the preferences of all buyers, mentioning the multifunction wheel as a less desirable choice for some.
|
 |
Positive: @dodi_vt (The Seller) highlighted the vehicle as a "real head turner," noting that they often receive waves and positive comments when driving it. Additionally, @dodi_vt confirmed the car's excellent condition, mentioning the tires having great tread depth and that the suspension is also in great condition. Another user, @Kraken3, applauded the car as a remarkable example after receiving comprehensive answers to their inquiries.
Neutral: @metalbuyer inquired about the presence of a boot cover for the convertible top, and @dodi_vt positively confirmed its availability and good condition. Meanwhile, @bringatrailer acknowledged @SaabFan's correction regarding the vehicle's transmission, signifying a commitment to maintaining accurate information. @Kraken3 raised several questions about the car's maintenance history, demonstrating a level of interest that suggests the vehicle's upkeep is a consideration for potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised around the car's heater valve, with @Kraken3 asking if it was causing any coolant leaks, although @dodi_vt stated they were unaware of any leaks. Furthermore, clarity was sought regarding the last service dates for the brakes and the transmission, with @dodi_vt admitting that the transmission had not been serviced recently. Additionally, @itsajaaaaaag expressed a personal preference for changing the wire wheels, indicating dissatisfaction with their aesthetic on later models.
|
 |
Positive: @americanprideclassics, the seller, has been very responsive to inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition. They mentioned that the motor has been cleaned up and is ready for the next owner, which shows preparation and care for the vehicle. Additionally, the seller confirmed that the tailgate operates properly, providing reassurance about the functionality of the truck.
Neutral: Several questions have been raised about the rust spots visible in photo 142 and whether it affects the vehicle's integrity. @VaHatch asked if the rust is mainly surface-related and if a slash depicted in photo 51 penetrates the body. In response, @americanprideclassics clarified that the rust is from an old fuel tank and indicated that the indent from the slash does not affect the vehicle's functionality. This exchange highlights the importance potential buyers place on understanding the condition of the vehicle before making decisions.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @68blue about the rust and duct tape seen in picture 142, suggesting that these imperfections may be deterring potential buyers. The comment reflects a fear that these issues could impact the overall desirability of the truck, despite acknowledging the value of the wheels and tires. This negativity suggests a perception that the visible defects might overshadow the truck's strengths and lead to a lack of interest from buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @adamvanshing shared that the vehicle has been surprisingly reliable during his 5,000 miles of ownership, consistently starting without leaks or breakdowns, and it has a smooth power delivery. He praised its drivability, stating that it can serve as a daily driver, and highlighted the impressive B&O sound system as a standout feature that he will miss the most. Additionally, he noted that the design of the car has aged well and still feels classy, adding to its appeal for enthusiasts looking for a V12 experience.
Neutral: The comments reflect a mix of inquiries and insights regarding the vehicle's condition and features. @Barry420 raised questions about maintenance records, door struts, and potential issues with the dash and rear brakes. @adamvanshing (The Seller) addressed these concerns, explaining that while he does not have comprehensive maintenance records, he has completed necessary work at Fast Cars and has provided details about the rear brakes and dash condition. Other users like @TheGuesser and @Escapedan shared their perspectives on the car's overall build quality and driving pleasure, underlining its appeal even as a used luxury asset.
Negative: Some negative feedback came from @adamvanshing regarding the navigation screen, which he found to be ineffective and outdated, despite some options available for upgrades. He also mentioned the occasional emissions warning, which does not affect drivability but requires attention, suggesting a potential ECU flash that comes with a hefty price tag from a dealer. Additionally, he noted that the exhaust system could be louder in quiet mode, leading him to modify it, which may not sit well with all owners.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments praise the Ford Falcon Futura, with @boaboyoz calling it a "fabulous" model and commending its color scheme. @NameTaken2 noted that a lot of effort and money were invested into the car, suggesting it is in great shape. Commenters express excitement about the vehicle, anticipating a bright future for it. @CrimsonRed04GT and @cwsteel appreciate the numerous upgrades, particularly the extensive body work and functional enhancements that set this Falcon apart from others in its class.
Neutral: The Seller, @ALepitzki10025, provides insightful information about the vehicle's history and specifics. They clarify that the former owner acquired the car in 2002 but it was not Marion Cartwright, addressing a direct question from @Rabjsb57. The Seller also discusses various upgrades made to the car, including an upgraded front suspension to support the heavier V8 engine, and mentions that all original components were removed during the restoration in 2006. Additional photo documentation of the car's condition and modifications is also available through a shared link.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, there are concerns or mild criticisms raised by commenters. @NameTaken2 mentions that the lack of air conditioning might be a downside for some buyers. Questions arise about the presence of bondo on the car, which @Ggoogs inquires about, to which @ALepitzki10025 reassures that no bondo was used in the bodywork. Moreover, @ob1xl points out a malfunctioning horn button, indicating a potential oversight in the car's detailing.
|
 |
Positive: @Blizzard340 expressed a positive shift in perspective, noting that after driving the Chevota, he changed his view from being a 'purist' who had never thought much about the vehicle. This suggests a newfound appreciation for its performance and features. Additionally, @GLWA and @GLCTraveler described the vehicle as having very nice conversation and cool features, indicating that it appeals to many as a modern take on classic designs.
Neutral: The discussion included detailed inquiries from various users regarding the vehicle's specifications and features. @GLCTraveler asked about the rear heater's functionality and the construction of front turn signal guards. @ronjohn inquired about the presence of rust, vehicle handling, and individual components like steering and oil leaks. The answers provided by @theV1 (The Seller) clarified many of these points while inviting further questions, such as the year of the engine and the make of the headers, which were somewhat addressed but remained partially unknown.
Negative: Despite the overall positive comments, @ronjohn raised concerns regarding potential rust on the body panels and the vehicle's performance at highway speeds, asking whether there were any oil leaks and what purpose certain switches served. These queries highlight some uncertainties and issues that prospective buyers might want to consider before making a purchase. Moreover, discussions about minor mechanical details, such as the throttle linkage being secured with a zip tie rather than a factory option, suggest that there may be areas in need of attention.
|
7k-Mile 2004 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Commemorative Edition
1G1YY12S645127045
Lot 202857
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the 2004 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Commemorative Edition, highlighting its status as a unique and collectible vehicle. @MartyKC mentions the car's low mileage, while @7257scottt praises its first-ever carbon fiber hood and powerful LS6 engine. Many, including @Tobyallen, emphasize its uniqueness and collectibility, suggesting that it's a wise investment. Multiple commenters, such as @getyourfreakon, affirm its beauty and desirability, portraying it as more than just a car, but a piece of art worth keeping in pristine condition.
Neutral: Several individuals mention the car's historical relevance, noting that it marks the last year of the C5 model. @psg559 compares its specific color favorably to earlier models, indicating a preference for its aesthetic. There are also comments about pricing trends, as @bakker16 remarks on the recent market fluctuation of these Commemorative Editions, which were previously priced lower but now appear to be increasing in desirability among collectors. @KWM3748 and @Tobyallen provide insights into the rarity of the car, noting its limited availability in their respective regions.
Negative: A few concerns arise regarding the vehicle's condition. @B206L4 points out that photos suggest an oil leak, prompting @chuckptx (The Seller) to reassure potential buyers that there are no actual leaks, attributing the appearance to minor seepage. This concern brings a note of caution among commenters, with @sotajohnny12 inquiring about original documentation and build sheets. Such inquiries underline the importance of thorough verification for prospective buyers looking to invest.
|
383-Powered Pro Street-Style 1987 Chevrolet R10 Silverado Fleetside Pickup
1GCDR14Z5HJ155705
Lot 202858
Private Party
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the Silverado as a scintillating silver vehicle and praises its tremendous build. @DOWNRANGEOPS expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle and indicates a keen interest in following future updates, marking it with "GLWTA!"
Neutral: @99duelly comments on the potential of the vehicle's 383 striker engine and notes the size of the rear tires, suggesting expectations for great results. They also point out the presence of a panhard bar and inquire about whether a four-link setup exists to enhance traction. @69GeneralLee (The Seller) confirms that the vehicle does indeed have a 4-link setup with a panhard bar. Additionally, @gordon906 questions the use of air bags and coil overs in the rear, indicating a need for clarification.
Negative: @r32fan asks if there is a driving video available, which reflects a desire for more engaging content. Meanwhile, @BeepBep45 notes that the seller has been relatively quiet, implying a lack of communication or engagement that could be viewed as a downside.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered significant praise from multiple commenters for its aesthetic appeal and mechanical condition. @justinbsc highlights that the 1971 Jaguar E-Type is 'extremely well sorted, both inside and out' with an updated AC system that is a rare bonus for classic cars. @YaRight calls it a 'beaut' particularly noting the working air conditioning, while @BloodyHell admires its original exterior paint, complemented by steel wheels. The overall consensus among enthusiasts is that this E-Type stands out for its immaculate leather interior and solid maintenance record, showcasing its status as a well-preserved classic.
Neutral: Comments reveal a good level of engagement from the classic car community, with enthusiasts sharing their own experiences. @lindbrosracing and @MartinPrestage have both previously owned E-Types, reflecting a general appreciation for the series, particularly the Series II model, which they deem the best for driving. @2_veloce expresses interest in ongoing maintenance should he win the auction, indicating the community's connection to the seller, @justinbsc, who is noted for his expertise in British vehicles and support during the auction process.
Negative: Despite the appreciation shown, there are some concerns also present. @WanderingFool inquires specifically about the financial estimates for necessary head work on the vehicle, indicating a potential hidden cost that might concern prospective buyers. Although @justinbsc provides a clear estimate of about $10,000 for cylinder head work, this transparency might cause some hesitation among undecided bidders who are wary of additional expenses that classic car maintenance can incur.
|
 |
Positive: @WinniBenz praises the vehicle's sharp appearance and well-maintained condition, highlighting the underappreciated Grigio Titanio color. @Journeymanlineman admires the beauty of the Ferrari, while @RossoCorsa328GTS says it looks very nice and wishes good luck with the auction. @BarryB1 expresses that if he didn't already own a similar car, he would bid and believes the winning bidder will love how it drives. @IvoChristov commends the maintenance and presentation of the Ferrari and encourages confidence in bidding. @henrymfisher notes his long-time acquaintance with the seller, emphasizing the high standard of maintenance the car has received.
Neutral: @Jimmilew provides a detailed overview of the Ferrari 360 Spider's history, mentioning its ownership and service records, and claims it is one of the cleanest examples available. He notes that the car has been lovingly maintained and rarely driven, with only 14,000 miles over 14 years. Several comments include inquiries about the wheels and mention the beauty and appeal of the vehicle, with @enzo4re asking about the wheel type and @M458 questioning the driving video's effectiveness, suggesting it lacked excitement.
Negative: @M458 expresses disappointment in the driving video's quality, claiming it was lacking in showcasing the car's capabilities. He questions the enthusiasm displayed by others, saying that they are only complimenting the car because it's a Ferrari. Additionally, he critiques whether viewers are recognizing the car's true potential, suggesting the need for aftermarket modifications to enhance its sound. Overall, while there are numerous positive remarks about the car's beauty and maintenance, some critiques imply an expectation for more dynamic showcases.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors generally express high praise for the vehicle, highlighting its excellent condition and strong performance. @dakotamatt remarks on how the EAG cars are in a different league, adding that the exhaust looks good and everything seems original. @GREEKMBA and @rcmotor share enthusiasm about the car's stunning appearance, with @rcmotor mentioning that the M5 has been well cared for as part of a sizable collection. Multiple users, including @s38 and @dream_weaver_train, commend the functioning SLS system and note the car's impressive features, suggesting it retains a level of authenticity that collectors value.
Neutral: There are some discussions regarding specific features and maintenance aspects of the vehicle, reflecting curiosity rather than criticism. @rx_jagetc and @rcmotor dive into the transmission change from the G280 to G265, with mixed opinions on aesthetics versus performance. User @lengrep expresses mild concern over the car's steering wheel alignment during a driving video, while @j_chitwood requests additional images of the headliner. These neutral comments reflect a mix of inquiries and observations rather than strong feelings about the car's quality.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about potential issues. @p535benz questions the temperature reading seen in photos, suggesting that it indicates an overheating problem, while @s38 expresses concern over the high temperature gauge. However, @rcmotor reassures buyers that the car does not have overheating issues, clarifying the context of the gauge readings during a photoshoot. Additionally, @dream_weaver_train seeks confirmation that various features function correctly, suggesting some skepticism regarding the overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: @fstezaws praises the vehicle's color, calling it one of the best for a GT3T, while @GDogg also appreciates the Yachting Blue, noting it rivals Baltic Blue. @Riptide2 is enthusiastic with an emoji response, and @168Victories describes the car as the "definition of sexy." @dogasaur humorously suggests playing Yacht Rock while driving the car, and @poormansporsche987 admires the car's configuration, calling it a dream car. @crlts compliments the build, referring to it as a gentleman's build. @TheRandall dreams of owning a similar car, and @ChrisCOak appreciates the photo capturing the color beautifully. @LolaC4S echoes others regarding the fantastic color, noting its changing appearance with light. @buybid22 (The Seller) receives good luck wishes from others, underscoring the car's appeal.
Neutral: @Mandinga provides a technical perspective, discussing the car's features and costs associated with upgrades and variations in the 992 series. @Jakelikescars88 asserts Yachting Blue is the best color, reflecting a strong opinion on aesthetic preferences. @porsche1986 mentions that every aspect of the car was meticulously chosen during ordering, while @69_911e comments on the price increases for newer models, hinting at market trends. @ama74 speculates on the bidding potential of this car in relation to price expectations, while @ototo_cilindri is straightforward in expressing their approval of the color and specification. @simpsoap finds the car simply lovely and seems curious about its auction outcome.
Negative: @kl_gt3 notes the car is already above their budget, indicating a concern for affordability. @onehussler expresses a personal conflict with newfound admiration for the color, and @NeedMoneyForPorsche hints at the tough view black calipers provide. @nolsen21 expresses uncertainty since they are not typically interested in touring models, while @rpz803ss has a query about whether the front axle lift system integrates with GPS, indicating a concern for functionality. Additionally, @TrueTide eagerly seeks confirmation on the car's maintenance history, revealing a hesitance about its upkeep. @buybid22 (The Seller) responds to these queries while noting recent service history, but the questions hint at potential concerns among buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are highly enthusiastic about the features and aesthetics of the BMW Z4 Convertible. @BubRudy points out that the options included make the car special, while @JGraham appreciates its low mileage and the attractive black on red interior, deeming it one of the best color combinations. @GDMCHRIZ (The Seller) highlights the vehicle's stunning condition and functioning equipment, emphasizing the exquisite red sport seats and the sporty driving experience provided by the Sport Mode button.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding the vehicle's history, notably by @eprochase who requests maintenance records, and @TMM423 who asks about a red light that illuminates during a test drive. @GDMCHRIZ (The Seller) provides responses to these questions, confirming the availability of maintenance records on Carfax and explaining that the airbag light issue is a common occurrence in many BMWs, indicating it will be addressed before sale. Additionally, the seller promotes affordable transport options for potential buyers, aiming to make the purchase process smoother.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the vehicle. @eprochase's repeated request for maintenance records suggests a desire for more transparency regarding the car's upkeep. Although @JGraham mentions the car's reliability, he also notes the importance of preventive maintenance on plastic components of the cooling system, hinting that neglect might lead to issues. This introductory caution may dissuade some potential buyers who are wary of maintenance costs in high-performance vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @Mpigors remarked on the vehicle's condition and the seller's meticulous nature, indicating that it's a great race car. @msracing, the Wolf USA importer, vouched for the car's quality, affirming that the current owner has maintained it excellently and offering future technical support to the new owner. @Scmcphe (The Seller) highlighted the car's potential with its adjustable power settings and lightweight carbon fiber body, making it a fast and exciting option for racers.
Neutral: @hangryharry inquired about the SCCA tech sticker's validity and requested details on the car's history and logbook. @PTRagonetti sought information regarding the racing club the car was involved with and its event history. There were questions from @hangryharry concerning prior damage to the vehicle, with @Scmcphe (The Seller) providing updates and additions about the SCCA Log Book for prospective buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised about previous incidents damaging the car, particularly through testing at Sonoma Raceway, where it sustained some impact damage. @hangryharry and @Scmcphe (The Seller) discussed the repairs made, although it appears that some potential buyers remain cautious due to the car's past incidents. However, overall opinions were generally favorable, indicating that while there have been issues, they have been adequately addressed.
|
 |
Positive: @DrmKlr praises the vehicle's appearance in red, expressing enthusiasm for the sale. @Abuelo finds the car beautiful and expresses a desire to purchase it if funds allowed. @gpmaym3 endorses the car after having seen and driven it, noting its remarkable condition for a 20-year-old vehicle and maintaining high standards in upkeep. @bmdaia appreciates the unique design features of the Turbo S and celebrates the rarity of the wheels, adding to the car's appeal. The seller, @SpecE30BMW, responds to potential buyer inquiries with transparency and detail, further instilling confidence in the car's condition and maintenance.
Neutral: @mxtr55 humorously comments on the car's speed and the potential pitfalls of owning such a powerful vehicle, reflecting a common sentiment among enthusiasts about the temptation to speed. @rituximab asks for additional technical details about the car, including battery specifications and climate control functionality, displaying a keen interest in ensuring quality. @FryingPan provides insights on the longevity of the PCCB brake system, offering a perspective on maintenance expectations, while @Nimbostratus acknowledges a write-up about the model in a relevant magazine, indicating a recognition of the car's significance within the community.
Negative: @thefleshrocket expresses a desire for a manual transmission, suggesting a preference for a more engaging driving experience that this vehicle does not offer. @TSolomon raises concerns about the previous brake maintenance not being documented in terms of measurements or expected lifespan, indicating a degree of skepticism about the car's upkeep. Additionally, there's a mention from @ncdriver996 inquisiting about the condition of rear lights, hinting at the car's need for care in detail that could be perceived as a negative aspect despite the overall positive comments.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle, praising the beautiful color and its overall design. @Dollycat3 expresses excitement with a welcoming remark, while @JosephAuto appreciates the timeless design of the 1967 model. @Papaed78 notes the attractive exterior and decent condition of the undercarriage, indicating that rust does not seem to be an issue. Commenters also acknowledge the car's potential as a good driver with some refreshing work, with @lrm1095 and @JLsKA510 mentioning its beauty when restored.
Neutral: Several commenters are inquiring about the car's condition and any required work. @Nukken1 is curious about the specifics of the work it needs beyond cosmetic issues, while @roosterabbydog questions the limited mileage since its purchase and mentions noted problems like a fuel leak. @Number_Six and @lrm1095 discuss the restoration costs in relation to the car's current condition, pointing out that the desired level of restoration will significantly affect expenses. @Schwieters99 (The Seller) reassures potential buyers by stating that the car is drivable and provides a smooth driving experience while clarifying that no significant issues were reported during his inspection.
Negative: Concerns about the car's reliability are also raised, with multiple comments pointing out the potential need for significant work. @SavMike suggests that a full renovation is necessary, while @Number_Six stresses the financial burden of restoration, indicating that it could easily exceed $100k for a professional job. @roosterabbydog further amplifies doubts about the seller's transparency, suggesting questions about the car's drivability and mechanical reliability remain unanswered. Additionally, @Mastin speculates that the right fender has been worked on, hinting at possible unresolved issues with the vehicle's body.
|
786-Mile 2022 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Heritage Edition Carbon Fiber Track Pack
1FA6P8SJ6N5501422
Lot 202831
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commentors express enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its features and appearance. @ArtZO6 appreciates the 'cool car' remark and shows interest in details about the vehicle's protection options, such as the full paint protection film (PPF) and the inclusion of the owner's kit. @Wheels77 confirms that the car indeed has full PPF and provides assurance about additional equipment, reinforcing the car's readiness for sale. Furthermore, there's excitement about the vehicle's warranty, which extends until 2030, signaling a good value for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments provide technical specifications and detailed components of the vehicle without strong opinions. @newcarpro shares a comprehensive list of technical details and features related to the vehicle’s production, technology package, and various configurations. While these comments add context for interested buyers, they do not convey a subjective view on the vehicle's desirability or performance. Both prospective buyers and enthusiasts may find this information useful for understanding the car's capabilities and features.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns and suggestions for improvement. @ArtZO6 notes that the $10K painted stripes are not necessary, suggesting a desire for practicality over aesthetics. Additionally, the listing includes multiple items referenced as 'LESS' which could indicate missing features or components that might deter some buyers. These points, combined with the extensive technical list from @newcarpro, convey a sense of hesitation about the completeness of the vehicle's package, suggesting that some potential buyers may require more reassurance about the car's features.
|
 |
Positive: Many commentators expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle, highlighting its unique color and overall design. @MartyM3ts mentioned their love for the blue color, especially without the black optic, emphasizing how refreshing the absence of dark finishes is. @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 echoed this sentiment by noting that the interior and silver wheels create a wonderful look, contrasting with the more common darker color schemes. @socialpro1 praised the ultra blue color as the best for the RS6 and remarked on the awesome specification of the car. The overall consensus among these comments celebrated the vehicle's aesthetics and rarity, as seen in @TheBrandonBailey's recognition of the great build and rare specifications.
Neutral: Some comments were neutral, focusing on logistical inquiries and requests for additional information about the car. @waffles2 inquired about posting a picture of the Monroney label and later noted details on the vehicle's features. @Cosmo007 asked about the original sale date to clarify when the Audi factory warranty started. @Skimotep requested information regarding the current transferable warranty and its extension eligibility. Additionally, @jes999 sought to confirm whether the RS6 had adaptive cruise control in one of the packages, and @VetteFish requested a legible photo of the window sticker. These comments reflect a curiosity about the vehicle's specifications and history without expressing strong opinions either way.
Negative: Conversely, some comments raised concerns about the car's specifications and ownership history. @bbrs questioned why there had been three owners in four years, hinting at potential issues with the vehicle. @dannyccmc noted that while the color is nice, the vehicle seemed to have unusually low specifications for an RS6, lacking key packages such as the black/carbon optic and drivers assistance package. This commentary suggests a level of skepticism regarding the car’s desirability based on its features. @Eyedoc1985 lamented that the interior did not match their preference, expressing disappointment that it wasn't equipped with black accents or blue stitching, indicating that while appreciation for the color exists, some aspects of the vehicle did not meet their expectations.
|
 |
Positive: @motorcar_collector notes that the vehicle is made in Southern California, which might appeal to buyers looking for local craftsmanship. @Knuckles-R-Busted expresses excitement about the new offering on BaT, suggesting that it has attracted attention within the community.
Neutral: @nofat95 suggests that a ride video would enhance the listing, indicating that visual media could play a role in showcasing the vehicle's performance. @DaveD makes a comment about the importance of the Year of Manufacture (YoM) bid in getting interest, pointing to elements of bidding culture surrounding the vehicle.
Negative: @Knuckles-R-Busted raises a concern about the seat back appearing lopsided in one of the photos, questioning whether it is an optical illusion or an actual issue with its positioning. @Blofish humorously critiques the design by referencing George Jetson, implying that the vehicle's aesthetics may not resonate well with everyone. @denniscarpe-0 (The Seller) clarifies that the seat was removed for engine photographs, suggesting that the perceived flaw might be a misunderstanding.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received several compliments regarding its aesthetic and build, particularly noted by @boaboyoz and @markusni, who described it as a 'charming Chalk 992.1 Carrera T' and a 'gentleman racer configuration build'. @Machinaw (The Seller) expressed enthusiasm for the car, having waited over a year to purchase it and appreciating the positive feedback from viewers. The seller also highlighted the fun aspect of sharing the car, mentioning the non-stop positivity from bystanders.
Neutral: There were requests for additional information about the vehicle's maintenance and features. @mhei2521 and @TrueTide inquired about the DME report, while @Averagejoe2 wanted to know if there would be holes in the bumper due to the removal of the front license plate. @calkid123 and @onehussler discussed the sound system, confirming that the vehicle has a standard stereo and a backup camera included, which @Machinaw (The Seller) clarified.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition, as @DsledgeR pointed out that the rear tires needed replacing after only 7K miles. Additionally, @Averagejoe2 expressed worries regarding potential holes in the bumper after the license plate removal. The comments from the community indicated some oversight in not asking for the DME on a previous vehicle, as noted by @mmhoss, suggesting a lack of attention to detail in inquiries.
|
 |
Positive: The car is being presented by @Collectibleclassics, a dealership known for its high customer satisfaction, boasting a Google Reviews rating of 4.9/5.0 with numerous 5-star reviews. They have a commitment to transparency in their transaction process and are open to inspections, offering services like Lemon Squad for potential buyers. The dealership emphasizes the uniqueness and desirability of the vehicles they source, ensuring a high-quality product for their customers.
Neutral: In terms of vehicle functionality, @Collectibleclassics provided clarity regarding specific inquiries from potential buyers, including the operation of the rear back window, the presence of two sets of keys, and the tire conditions. They confirmed regular cruise control, with paint meter readings that suggest minor prior damage to the driver's door and rear quarter panel. The paint work, if any, appears professionally done, and the dealership reassures that the car’s aesthetics are in good shape with no significant previous damage.
Negative: Some potential buyers raised concerns regarding the vehicle's paint meter readings, interpreting them as indicative of possible damage rather than minor issues, with @Tommie57 expressing skepticism about the car's history. There were also questions about any lingering odors from previous use, especially regarding smoking, which @EricRow reinforced by asking for clarification on any smells in the car. While @Collectibleclassics reassured buyers that there were no strange smells detected, the questions reflect unease among potential buyers about the car's condition and past issues.
|
 |
Positive: @1globalleader comments positively about the Town Car, noting its nice appearance and condition that looks cleaner than its reported mileage of 159K. @maw06 states that the Lincoln Town Car is very well sorted, with a comfortable interior and good overall condition, mentioning that it feels easy to work on. @HenryVal shares a favorable experience with a similar title issue, suggesting that the reported mileage appears correct and expressing confidence in the car's condition as presented by the seller.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) explains the situation regarding the branded title, stating it was an error and assuring buyers of the actual mileage. @NYAIRGUARD highlights that while the car might not be in investment-grade condition, it serves as a nice daily driver. @Roadwander clarifies that the Town Car's digital odometer can reach a maximum of 999,999 miles, providing technical insight into its mileage potential.
Negative: @Spikeville questions the reason behind the branded title, speculating on potential previous accidents. @onebadlsc expresses concern regarding mismatched tires and the overall state of the vehicle. @Jimbob123 shares cautionary advice based on personal experience with Town Cars, discussing common issues like power window switch failures and HVAC problems, which may deter interested buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praise the vehicle, highlighting its exceptional restoration and stunning aesthetics. @ck1951 mentions it looks brand new, as if just out of the factory while @Mike_Breinin appreciates the book related to the car, confirming its historic significance. Both @LoneStarMotorsports and @bfeurer express interest in seeing driving videos, indicating excitement about its performance. The stunning Gulfstream blue color receives compliments, with @artpirate333 and @davetona sharing personal anecdotes about similar cars to showcase the cherished memories and nostalgia associated with the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments focus on details about the car's restoration and specifications. @buybid22 (The Seller) provides background on the vehicle, confirming its original components and lack of rust repair, while @70-455s discusses the restoration process and mentions the car's history with various owners. Questions arise regarding the engine specifications and potential modifications, with @HemiEddie426 and @Sigma76 engaging in discussions about original parts and specifications. The mix of excitement and curiosity reflects a deeper understanding of classic car restorations and their impacts on value.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about the vehicle's restoration and authenticity. @CarguyJason raises issues related to door alignment, while @Flattrackracer36 questions the originality of certain components, including the transmission. @HemiEddie426 reacts to the engine block being decked, indicating a loss of original identity, which could deter potential buyers. Additionally, @JosCherry suggests that despite its quality, the car may still be priced below market, hinting at apprehension regarding its auction value.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the overall condition and originality of the vehicle, describing it as a clean, well-maintained example of a stock TTA. @fastpace noted the impressive condition of the driver’s seat, while @Craven remarked that the car's style holds up beautifully with age. @JohnnyMichigan shared his experience with a similar model, highlighting its exhilarating performance and solid power, mentioning that it was a joy to drive. @Randy53 expressed excitement about the auction, stating that it's great to see a car that has actually been driven and enjoyed, rather than left idle. @sy1616 celebrated the enjoyment factor, emphasizing that it's refreshing to see a car being used as intended.
Neutral: Commenters discussed the mileage and its impact on the vehicle's condition, with @dgershon pointing out that the car looks clean for having 61K miles. @lunchbocks2002 mentioned the possibility of adding the car to a collection, discussing its appeal with @JoeSketti, who noted the vehicle's cleaner look compared to those with decals. The conversation around the car’s performance compared to other vehicles, such as @Randy53's question about its speed relative to Buick's Turbo V-6s, added some technical discussion to the mix, with @Kidsixpack confirming the TTA's superiority in speed over a stock GN.
Negative: Despite the praise, there were some concerns noted by @JohnnyMichigan regarding the vehicle's interior materials, which he described as having a lot of plastic typical of that era, along with issues he experienced with rear spoiler cracks and a troublesome rear hatch latch that was difficult to find parts for. These concerns hint at potential downsides for future owners, particularly in regard to maintenance and durability. Overall, while the majority of comments are positive, some reservations about parts availability and material quality were mentioned.
|
985-Mile 2019 Volkswagen Beetle Convertible 2.0T Final Edition SEL
3VW5DAAT8KM511915
Lot 202776
Dealer
 |
Positive: @Anodup88 commented on the beauty of the car, showing enthusiasm for its design. @soulfuldriving also praised the car, calling it beautiful and was curious about its low mileage and storage conditions. The seller, @NOLAmotorcars, responded that the car appears to have been garage kept and in excellent condition. @trident3 shared a personal account of a similar model that receives frequent compliments and is described as a great car. @seanpagedrummer expressed deep affection for the VW Beetle, calling it his favorite car and suggesting that this particular model looks pristine. Other comments highlighted the fun and crowd-pleasing nature of the convertible, with @bondgraham noting his enjoyment of a similar model and its turbocharged performance.
Neutral: There were some inquiries about the auction process, with @jameskowski questioning the no-reserve auction and the $35,000 opening bid, which he found puzzling. @NOLAmotorcars explained the decision behind the bidding strategy, emphasizing that the starting bid reflects the market value for this rare vehicle. @skylane9 had questions regarding accessories such as the wind deflector and tonneau cover, with several commentors discussing the standard features of the 2019 models and sharing their experiences with similar vehicles. @Msm7845 asked for clarification regarding a possible blemish in the images and the operation of the top, to which the seller offered prompt explanations and promised to provide additional videos of the car.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the auction starting bid of $35,000, with @sman5 describing it as suspicious and indicating it might deter bidders. Several users expressed skepticism about the auction's potential for a bidding war and questioned the value of the car based on the opening bid. @VintagePete echoed similar doubts about the auction strategy, casting doubt on the auction's integrity. The price and bidding concerns appeared to overshadow some of the positive comments regarding the car's appearance and condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly noting its striking color and design. @OHcarguy mentioned its appearance on 'Hoovies Garage' as a notable feature, while @GDogg and @eurowheels shared their admiration, labeling the DBX 707 as 'gorgeous' and expressing excitement for its purchase. @Msobczyk acknowledged the rarity of the Lime Essence color, indicating that they had seen different colors but would have considered this one. Additionally, @newcarpro humorously noted that the car is suitable for making an entrance, suggesting it has a bold presence.
Neutral: Some commenters sought information about the vehicle's features, with @Gawalla29 sharing their experience with CarPlay difficulties and inquiring about its functionality. @WalserSellsCars (The Seller) responded with clarity, explaining that the car has a USB port in the center console necessary for CarPlay to operate correctly. Likewise, @SNDThomas requested clarification on what a 'Cherokee Nation Title' entails, and @WalserSellsCars (The Seller) elaborated on how the title works in Oklahoma and what advantages it offers when purchasing high-end cars.
Negative: On the downside, there was a note of confusion and frustration regarding the vehicle's technology features. @Gawalla29's difficulties with CarPlay raised concerns about user-friendliness, describing the dealer's explanation as the 'dumbest thing' they had ever heard. This sentiment hinted at a potential disconnect between luxury branding and practical user experience. Such comments reflect a critical perspective on the vehicle's technological integration and user interface.
|
 |
Positive: @ExclusiveMotorClub expressed excitement about the auction of the AT4X, highlighting it as an impressive truck with ample power. @CRUSH called it a beast of a truck, emphasizing its strong presence. @need2fillmygarage referred to it as a beautiful and capable truck, which adds to the overall positive perception of its appearance and functionality.
Neutral: @newcarpro provided specific vehicle information including delivery dates, specifications, and various option codes. The details shared highlight the businesslike transparency around the truck's features, service contracts, and build specifications without indicating a personal opinion about its quality. This information serves to inform potential buyers about what they can expect from the vehicle without imparting a subjective viewpoint.
Negative: There were no negative comments noted in the provided data. @need2fillmygarage raised a question about why the truck is for sale on BaT, indicating possible curiosity about the seller's motives without implying any negativity. The overall tone of the comments was supportive, with no apparent complaints or issues expressed about the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Kevinmombeini has reported that the vehicle drives well and has been regularly serviced, indicating a level of reliability and care over its maintenance history. The seller intends to provide a driving video and a cold start demonstration, which can further assure potential buyers about its performance and condition.
Neutral: While @canitfitkids raised a question about the timing chain, @Kevinmombeini clarified that there is no indication of any issues regarding it, and all information aligns with what is documented in the Carfax report. He mentioned that although there are no records confirming a timing chain change, the vehicle has been regularly serviced at a reputable location, suggesting a good upkeep.
Negative: There seems to be some uncertainty regarding the timing chain history on the vehicle, which may be a concern for some potential buyers. The lack of concrete records could lead to questions about the vehicle's maintenance, although @Kevinmombeini expressed confidence in its condition with no current noises or issues indicated.
|
 |
Positive: @Just_me highlights the desirability of the car's color, mentioning that the Ferrari yellow finish is a cool choice for the era, especially given its historical context. @BrokeJoke appreciates the seller's decision to list the car at no reserve, showing confidence in its value. @dwikk, a previous owner, praises the car as a fantastic example of an M Coupe, noting the quality of its paint job and its upgraded condition under the current owner’s care. @NicksCar (The Seller) expresses gratitude for the supportive comments and confirms the quality enhancements made since selling the car. Enthusiasts like @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 and @hualon2600 are enchanted by the vehicle's aesthetics, especially its captivating color.
Neutral: There are some clarifications about the vehicle, particularly regarding its history and technical details. @stg83 points out a typo in the listing related to the car's location, which @NicksCar confirms and plans to rectify. Discussions around the reported mileage variances due to potential mix-ups between kilometers and miles are brought up by @frozenbird, which @dwikk supports with insights from their experience. @Bibendum5 inquires about the car's construction details, which @NicksCar responds to, explaining past repairs and the quality of the repainting, while engaging other potential buyers in thoughtful discussion about the car’s modifications and current condition.
Negative: Concerns have emerged regarding some discrepancies in the vehicle's reported mileage, along with questions about the overall history of repairs, brought up by @frozenbird and @Bibendum5. There is a bit of skepticism regarding the car's export potential, with @3liter inquiring about potential tariffs for importing Canadian cars into the U.S., to which @NicksCar attempts to clarify but acknowledges the additional steps involved. Some comments suggest a bit of confusion among bidders about modifications to the seat height and adjustments made by previous owners, which may leave some potential buyers concerned about its originality and comfort, as hinted by @MTDatsun.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed appreciation for the Jeep's design and color, with @HPoint noting the specs and even commenting on a potential personalized plate. @gb70 praised the color as beautiful and @Hackberry highlighted the cool and unique color combo. @WRRobinette (The Seller) received thanks for answering questions, particularly regarding the vehicle's condition post-repairs, with no overheating or fluid consumption reported since the timing chain work was done. Additionally, the Jeep is described as 100% rust-free, and @WRRobinette (The Seller) emphasized thorough inspections before purchasing, further reassuring potential buyers.
Neutral: Commenters inquired about the vehicle's history and specific features, with @GOIN4XN asking for details on the reported fire damage. @MALE sought clarification on whether the paint and wood grain are original and whether the A/C has been recharged, while @dchurch2469 asked about any rust issues. @WRRobinette (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the fire damage by explaining it was minor, attributed to a faulty carburetor, and that it had been properly sorted during prior service. The seller also confirmed that the interior and carpet are original except for a recently replaced headliner, and the hood is a slightly lighter shade than the rest of the vehicle due to age differences in paint.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the fire damage, with @GOIN4XN and @Whitey69 questioning the specifics, indicating a degree of apprehension. Additionally, @HPoint and @MALE brought up technical issues, such as non-functional power locks and A/C, which could deter potential buyers if not addressed. The request for videos by @HPoint showcased the need for potential buyers to see the vehicle's operation to alleviate concerns about performance and functionality. Overall, while the vehicle has positive attributes, the noted issues and past damage create a dialogue around its condition that may influence interest.
|
 |
Positive: @WAGroup (The Seller) describes the '48 Mercury Eight 'Street Rod' convertible as a gorgeous and unique vehicle. They're enthusiastic about helping potential buyers with transport or pickup logistics in Columbus, OH, which reflects a positive willingness to assist customers in their purchasing journey.
Neutral: @mumblypeg280 shares nostalgic memories tied to flathead Ford/Mercury cars, particularly recalling experiences from his youth that emphasize the cultural significance of these vehicles. While his comments do not directly assess the vehicle for sale, they highlight the emotional connection and fondness many have for these classic cars.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: @AHG09 expressed their affection for the car, Clover, describing it as adorable and sharing heartfelt wishes for the sale. @TXGold24 (The Seller) reflected on their emotional attachment to the car, noting it was beloved by their mother and hoping it would bring joy to a new owner. The Seller also mentioned the car's great performance, stating it was well-maintained, stored indoors, and had new tires and a battery, emphasizing its readiness for a new adventure.
Neutral: @maw06 inquired about maintenance documentation, to which @TXGold24 (The Seller) acknowledged the lack of records but offered to provide receipts for recent purchases. @difficulTT asked about the car's running condition, noting the low mileage since 2013, and expressed interest in any available videos. @ddama1 sought more detailed information about service records and mechanical needs for long trips, particularly regarding any recalls.
Negative: @ddama1 raised concerns about the recall specific to the front passenger seat sensor, questioning why it hadn't been addressed by the previous owner. @TXGold24 (The Seller) explained the situation regarding the recall and highlighted that they were advised by a mechanic there were no issues, but recommended a personal visual inspection pre-trip. This indicates a lingering concern about the car's complete readiness despite prior assurances.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's design and modifications. @MCShack appreciates the engine size and the attractive Mexico Blue color. @Jimmyblues1959 highlights the tasteful customization and aggressive looks, indicating satisfaction with the vehicle's performance. @Wildboar, despite initial reservations about the absence of original front turn signals, is won over by the engine sound. Several other commenters, including @Vwrabbitgti and @panteramike74, praise specific styling elements like the 944 nose treatment and the instrument cluster, showcasing overwhelming enthusiastic responses towards the car's aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: There are also queries and clarifications about specific vehicle features and performance. Commenters such as @CarNutMiami and @reload asked for details regarding the A/C and street legality, with @Sircaralot (The Seller) promptly addressing these concerns, assuring that the A/C functions well and the car is indeed street legal. Similarly, @phil_c and @Doogle10 sought information on possible modifications and existing components like parking brakes, with @Sircaralot responding with what he could share about the vehicle's condition and capabilities, indicating an openness to dialogue around car specifics.
Negative: A few comments reflect skepticism or highlight potential issues related to the vehicle. @dr914 sarcastically suggests that 20 grand could fix anything, implying concerns over the car's current state. @kenshapiro2002 raises questions about the apparent elevation of the front hood and speckling on the dash, indicating they see some issues that need clarification. @Vwrabbitgti's inquiry about paperwork from the car's build suggests underlying concerns regarding the provenance and history of modifications, which @Sircaralot regretfully admits lack documentation for, raising potential doubts among buyers about the vehicle's history.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its attractive features and overall appeal. @rmorin49 praises its appearance by calling it a "Very nice Goat" while @Sineef calls it "Beautiful GOAT!" and admires its striking Cardinal Red color. @SLG455 expresses delight in the car's sound and looks, emphasizing its beauty. Overall, many users appreciate the car's aesthetic and performance potential, suggesting it runs well with comments like @PontiacNut mentioning it "scratches gears easily" and @1Bad69GOAT noting it sounds "really healthy."
Neutral: Several comments seek more information about the vehicle, with inquiries regarding its original features. @MajorDuc questions if the car originally had AC, to which @AEGonza (The Seller) confirms that while it was an AC car, the previous owner removed it. There are also discussions about various aspects of the car’s setup, such as the rear end gearing mentioned by @Sineef, who asks for specifics on the gearing and paint code. Additionally, @Mr.Majestyk inquires about the Alpine Head Unit, indicating interest in the stereo setup within the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the car's representation and minor issues that could be perceived as neglect. @moontower critiques the seller for not demonstrating the car's power during the test drive, suggesting it was driven too slowly. @Banksonit709 specifically points out the antenna issue, calling it a disappointment for a seller to leave uncorrected before listing, which was echoed by concerns about the condition by @Nutzandboltz who suggests that potential bidders may overlook it. These negative comments reflect unease about the seller's attention to detail when presenting the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @keithfitz described the bike as very cool, highlighting the build quality and expressing an interest in watching the vehicle. @HHRider praised the bike for being straightforward with only necessary features for riding, indicating a personal connection to it, while @rexfox complimented the custom details and wished good luck to both the buyer and seller. @Mclassic1 also found the bike cool, expressing a desire for it if transport costs were lower. Furthermore, @Ironpope13, the seller, emphasized the bike's robust running capabilities and power, which added to the overall positive reception.
Neutral: @broodie recognized the bike's appeal to certain audiences, acknowledging that while it might not be their style, they understood its allure. @Jack659831 commented on the bike’s essential components, appreciating the design while relating it to personal constraints like family responsibilities. @Aussie69er inquired about the bike's handling over speed bumps, seeking practical information rather than expressing a strong personal opinion.
Negative: @Mclassic1 mentioned that the transport cost to Texas was steep, which could be a deterrent for potential buyers. @rexfox indicated a concern about their riding years possibly being short due to the power of the bike, suggesting apprehension about the bike's capability. This mixed reception on the riding experience hinted at doubts regarding its suitability for older riders.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters express hope for the restoration of the Continental Mark II, emphasizing its potential despite its current condition. @Sparrownaut notes the car's significance as possibly America's last great luxury car, indicating that it deserves a revival regardless of economic sense. @NavyDave and @Mordizzle envision a transformation into a cool, stylish vehicle, while @CPT_Morgan informs others about the value of the wheel covers, suggesting he sees the car as a worthy project. @genevamotorcars (The Seller) also reassures potential buyers that the car is in better shape than the photos suggest, highlighting its intact body and trim.
Neutral: Some comments take a more analytical view on the vehicle's condition and the challenges of restoration. @Grimsby discusses the high costs associated with restoring a Continental Mark II, encouraging customization for potential profits. @neilpierson25 mentions the need for significant investment in various parts, particularly bodywork and interiors. Meanwhile, @ClassicCarsLLC refers to the car as more of a parts car than a viable project, implying a more pragmatic approach to its sale. Several users also comment on the car's aesthetic, noting its resemblance to a once-beautiful model that has fallen on hard times, particularly reflected in @GlennD46's striking comparison.
Negative: Many comments reflect disappointment in the current state of the Mark II, with users characterizing it as a shadow of its former glory. @Dollycat3 remarks that it has been "road hard and put away wet," and @frank-in-afghanistan portrays it as an embarrassment due to its inappropriate wheels. @Grimsby and @Highlander63 share sentiments about the car being sad to see in its current condition, while @rickaz focuses on the vehicle needing significant restoration efforts. Furthermore, @genevamotorcars (The Seller) acknowledges that the car has not been worked on, stressing the level of neglect it has experienced.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and classic design. @pip007 called it a "stunner" and praised the bonnet strap as a lovely touch. @FunRun4Ever shared their enthusiasm for their own 1954 TF, noting how it has become their favorite car, bringing joy and attention on the road, stating that people often honk and wave. @CCK121 (The Seller) emphasized the MG TF's unique characteristics and its successful restoration journey from a South Dakota barn find, encouraging bidders to appreciate the car's history and quality.
Neutral: In the discussions, @CCK121 (The Seller) provided clarifications about various aspects of the vehicle, including its condition and components. For instance, when @LHSURF inquired about the side curtains, the seller confirmed they were in 'new' condition but had minor scratches. Similarly, when @Garp1234 asked about the operational wipers, @CCK121 informed them about the missing motor and provided info on a replacement source.
Negative: There were concerns raised regarding the vehicle's maintenance and functionality. @iangail questioned the condition of the engine and transmission, prompting @CCK121 (The Seller) to explain that there was no documentation of an engine rebuild, although it was likely that it had been done due to the age of the car. They confirmed that there were no signs of engine issues, but also noted that the first gear required careful engagement to avoid it popping out. Additionally, some bidders like @Garp1234 expressed practical concerns about the vehicle's performance in rainy conditions.
|
 |
Positive: @Zep11 describes the car as really nice and in very good condition despite the driver's seat leather showing wear. @RockyRotella recalls the enjoyable experience of driving a similar model with over 100,000 miles, highlighting aspects like comfort and fuel efficiency, and comments that this particular example will surely make someone happy. @EMUNSONL98 speaks highly of the vehicle’s reliability, reminiscing about their own positive experiences with a previous model, and believes this one has a lot of life left, saying someone will get a wonderful car.
Neutral: @jgansen197 (The Seller) notes that the driver's seat does show minimal wear, while the rear seats appear to be in pristine condition. He also mentions that while there are no major issues diagnosed with the car, the key has not gotten stuck in the ignition after some maintenance, and the air conditioning and heating are working properly. Additionally, he acknowledges the paint's good condition and assumes it was likely always garaged.
Negative: @Red08G8GT raises concerns about certain issues such as the sticky ignition switch and other mechanical components, inquiring if they have been diagnosed. @1gamedog points out that the exhaust does not appear to be factory standard, suggesting a potential discrepancy between the seller's description and reality. @jgansen197 confirms the sound may have been a misunderstanding, as factory exhaust may have a different style sound.
|
 |
Positive: Many commentators praised the vehicle for its aesthetic appeal and build quality. @Butwhy described it as "gorgeous," while @IceBolt07 referred to it as an "absolute beauty" that sounds great. Commentators like @wharf209 and @Dmcheker also expressed admiration for the interior and the overall design, with @gmagno even suggesting they might need to refinance their house to afford it, highlighting its desirability. The response from @911r (The Seller) shows that further details and visuals of the vehicle entice the audience, with additional comments affirming its exceptional features, like the suspension setup that @Mr.shift noted.
Neutral: Some comments reflected a mix of admiration with reservations. @MexicoJoe mentioned they are holding out for a different model, the Megalon V8, which suggests a preference but doesn't detract from the overall acclaim for the F-250. @Blueox76 pointed out potential shortcomings regarding the transmission's capability for heavy-duty use, indicating a need for structural upgrades without discounting the vehicle's remarkable build. @Johnnymopar expressed interest while critiquing the 'Godzilla' nickname for its Japanese connotations, adding a conversational nuance to the discussion about this American truck.
Negative: However, there were critical voices among the enthusiastic responses. @Blueox76 expressed disappointment over the light-duty transmission, emphasizing limitations for heavy usage and suggesting extensive modifications might be required. @TidyRigs was frustrated with the bidding situation, claiming that the truck was undervalued at lower bids, and conveyed that they found the bids "lame." Overall, while the vehicle is widely considered stunning, there are concerns about its practical capabilities and a few frustrations within the auction dynamics.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praises the 190 Ponton for its wonderful characteristics, including its color combination, condition, and documentation. @Shawh expresses love for the vehicle, recalling its introduction to the American market as a success. @RogerD reflects on the car’s appeal to a young, successful German banker and wishes good luck to the consigner. @Oakhurst reminisces about their family’s history with a 220S model and shares fond memories of its use at prom and church, showing an appreciation for Mercedes vehicles. @iknoian (The Seller) highlights that this car is a reliable family friend and boasts attributes such as being rust-free, accident-free, and great for fuel economy. @bondgraham notes the relaxing driving experience of a Ponton, while @UncleFred1 considers this vehicle a lovely example that's in better shape than the recently sold 220. @strangesubset01 agrees that these cars are underrated and receives more attention than high-end sports cars, calling them a great value.
Neutral: Several commenters share fond memories and relative experiences with the 190 series, including @Catana246, who recalls their family's long-lasting diesel version. @delmarfinancial fondly remembers a faded blue 190 from their childhood. @Jgrahamdmd appreciates the early models of the 190 for their aesthetic differences compared to later versions, indicating a keen interest in the model's design evolution. @iknoian (The Seller) provides insights on specific technical aspects of the car's engine and historical context regarding performance metrics compared to the 190SL.
Negative: While the comments are overwhelmingly positive, some subtle critiques are present. @UncleFred1 suggests that even though this 190 is a solid car, a bit of re-commissioning and refreshing would significantly enhance its appeal, implying that some maintenance work is necessary. This comment highlights that while the vehicle is functional and solid, it might need attention to maximize its potential. No major negative comments about the car's performance or reliability are evident, reflecting a generally favorable perception.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters noted the car's outstanding condition and aesthetic appeal. @Gabagul praised it as the 'best year, best color, best spec, best car,' highlighting the desirability of the Miata. @PhilO described it as a 'beautiful car' and emphasized that it is a great example, particularly admiring the wheels. @Eborn called it a 'true beauty on wheels,' indicating its rarity and high quality, especially with the gold accents. @U0NLYLV4N0W and @Thirty-three-and-a-third also shared their admiration, praising both the car's design and its unique color, while @Eliteman (The Seller) backed this up by asserting that the soft top was in perfect condition and promised to provide photos, further underscoring the car's appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification regarding specific details about the vehicle. @mrjam inquired about the condition of the soft top, while @ahavey asked if it included specific M Edition accessories. @midlifemotors and @countryroads raised questions about potential rust and corrections in the listing for additional accuracy, respectively. @Bob_MX5 offered some technical feedback regarding the soft top's plastic window and how it is typically handled, suggesting that this was a concern for future owners. @Eliteman (The Seller) responded with detailed information about the car's history and features, including maintenance records, which aligns with the interest in verifying the car's specifications.
Negative: Despite the overall positivity, there were some criticisms regarding the car's condition and presentation. @Bob_MX5 pointed out a contradiction in the Seller's remarks about the soft top, implying potential neglect concerning the plastic window and its management. This comment hinted at concerns for future ownership and maintenance. @U0NLYLV4N0W argued that the issue of the plastic rear window was overstated and suggested a simple replacement as a solution, showing a more pragmatic viewpoint on maintenance. Additionally, there's a shared nervousness about how the car has been stored and cared for, reflecting potential issues for long-term buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its excellent condition and specifications. @Pizzaman09 noted the meticulous attention to mechanical details in its assembly, emphasizing that it includes desirable features such as a 4.0L engine, 4x4 capability, and a Dana 44 rear axle. @SAbonis praised it as a beautiful MJ, and @Thackersm referred to it as one of the best-looking examples they've seen, affirming the vehicle's quality with a 'good luck with the auction' sentiment. Moreover, @HCLucero (The Seller) confirmed that the A/C works beautifully, further reinforcing the vehicle's appealing features.
Neutral: Some comments dealt with practical inquiries about the vehicle, such as shipping logistics and technical specifications. @Double_clutch expressed frustration regarding the shipping quote process and the attention it draws, though the necessary information was pointed out by @gokstate, who noted a shipping quote submission available on the desktop site. @Anduff asked specific questions about body repairs, and @CDehne inquired about the use of wheel spacers for tire clearance, showing participants are engaged with technical aspects of the vehicle and interested in clarifying possible issues.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding the vehicle's modifications and potential issues. @Powerbolt raised questions about the authenticity of the 4x4 conversion, seeking clarification on the transfer case used and requesting a demonstration of the 4WD functionality. Additionally, @westerabq expressed curiosity about the presence of cruise control and power windows, hinting at an expectation for features that may not be standard in this model year. These comments illustrate some skepticism about the vehicle's modifications and specifications.
|
 |
Positive: @dani__alvi_ called the E30 "Gorgeous" and wished the seller good luck with the auction. @Redbaron95 mentioned that the Eta motor is underrated, praising its low-end torque and efficiency, which makes it a good street motor. @StavrosP shared an appreciation for the model's characteristics, noting its high rev limit and unique design features, indicating a strong affection for this vehicle style.
Neutral: @FredL sought clarification from the seller about the car's emissions compliance, specifically for California, and requested clearer pictures of the vehicle's details. @Warrenlu (The Seller) confirmed the car’s emissions compliance with Washington State regulations and acknowledged the need for additional photos to improve the listing. Discussions also covered the reserve price of the auction and general maintenance inquiries, with @slammin providing clarification on the listing process at BaT.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's maintenance history, particularly regarding the timing belt, with @StavrosP emphasizing its importance and questioning if it had been replaced due to the car's age and mileage. @cjklim and @StavrosP stated their belief that this E30 model uses a timing belt, contradicting @Warrenlu's assertions. Additionally, @cjklim inquired about rust, demonstrating apprehension regarding potential body issues despite the overall interest in the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @bimmere39m5 expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, stating that everyone should be looking for a Swedish Brick, considering them amazing. @BabyD69 also shows interest by stating their desire for a Swedish brick. @T5ing comments positively on the wheels, noting that they resemble IPD Pegasus replicas, while @De-marko simply affirms that the vehicle looks good. Additionally, @Sjalabais highlights the growing trend of viewing Volvo wagons as a fashionable investment, coinciding with popular automotive commentary.
Neutral: @gf2020 raises a point about their hesitance towards a Swedish brick but notes the convenience of its local availability. @nektarios inquires about the cost implications of adding a third pedal to the vehicle, prompting a detailed breakdown of potential expenses shared by @T5ing, including costs for a full swap, new flywheel, and labor. @cousinchill requests videos to feel more assured about bidding, indicating a desire for reassurance regarding the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @vkgotoma112 questions the reason behind the replacement of the steering wheel airbag cover, hinting at concerns about the vehicle's modifications. In response, @michaelagalvin (The Seller) explains that it was due to a recall from Volvo, albeit noting the unavailability of the original R symbol, which may invoke skepticism about authenticity or completeness. Overall, while some comments are positive or neutral, there are hints of underlying concerns regarding modifications and the need for verification.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed deep admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beautiful appearance and restoration quality. @LuisV called it "Bella!!", while @carelallen exclaimed, "Oh I am in love! 😍. It is a beautiful Fulvia!" @Raffi also noted the car's wonderful colors and praised its restoration, mentioning its impressive twin-cam V4 engine and fun driving dynamics. The restoration was emphasized by @dgclassiccars (The Seller), who described it as the best Fulvia they have encountered, highlighting the €30,000 spent on its bare metal restoration. Other positive comments applauded the color combination and overall aesthetic, with @tadan_e30 stating it was a "gorgeous example!" and @RCEurope called it a stunning Series 1 Fulvia Coupe.
Neutral: Several comments provided neutral observations about the vehicle, focusing on specific features and potential areas of concern. @Martyn10 appreciated the vehicle's condition but inquired about additional wooden dashboards and observed some imperfections in the paintwork, mentioning it looked a bit "orange peel" in certain areas. @William_S acknowledged the classic appeal of the color combo but highlighted some details that need clarification, such as the condition of the toolkit and rust repairs. @TomHF raised questions about the engine's overhaul and individual components which need more detailed information, reflecting a typical buyer's curiosity about restoration specifics. @TheLuckyDude requested additional photos to clarify the paint's appearance, showing an interest in transparency.
Negative: Some negative feedback was directed towards the car's paint quality and restoration details. @TheLuckyDude and @Danielito noted the noticeable orange peel effect in the paint, suggesting it could detract from the vehicle's overall appeal. @William_S mentioned downsides such as the rough paint job and concerns over a dent visible in a specific photo, implying a lack of thoroughness in the restoration process. Additionally, @TomHF highlighted that repairing the Hardy disc component could be crucial, indicating potential maintenance challenges for prospective buyers. There was also a sentiment expressed by @mgdude1998 about the overall undervaluing of the Fulvia compared to its contemporaries, which could cast a shadow over its market prospects.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its unique design and driving experience. @Round_Rock_Rob noted that this vehicle was a perfect solution for those who cannot ride on two wheels due to balance issues. @bforbesut shared their long-standing love for the T-Rex, expressing enthusiasm for its continued production. @DLP756 described the T-Rex as amazing, excitedly mentioning its top speed of 125 mph and the thrill of driving it, while @PhilO was enamored by its performance of 0-60 mph in approximately 3.9 seconds.
Neutral: The seller, @GCEA, offered detailed information about the vehicle in response to various comments. They clarified a typo about the mileage, confirming that it has only 60 miles, and provided performance specs upon request, including its acceleration and cornering capabilities. They also shared that driving videos were in the works, adding to the excitement surrounding the auction. Several potential buyers inquired about specific details, such as additional fees and shipping logistics, reflecting a level of interest and desire for more information before making a bid.
Negative: Some comments included skepticism or humor about the vehicle's uniqueness and price. @Richard17 joked about @Round_Rock_Rob's balance problem being caused by his wife and doctor’s advice, suggesting a lighter take on the topic. Additionally, @Meccanica cautioned the seller to tone down claims of the T-Rex being 'cooler' than a motorcycle. @Lotusseven humorously expressed being overwhelmed by the vehicle's visual appeal, showing that not all responses were strictly positive or negative, but rather mixed with a touch of levity.
|
 |
Positive: @knotleykcorb expressed confidence in the vehicle's longevity, citing his own experience with a 1997 Accord that has over 200,000 miles. @Eleuthera reminisced fondly about an old car of theirs and described the vehicle as 'sweet'. @s219 noted that this specific model is a Type SH, which typically holds higher collector value due to its unique features, and @billyg35 confirmed this by referencing the CarFax. @The_Dude_Abides emphasized the underrated nature of these cars, suggesting it could be a great example with some effort and noted the rarity of surviving Preludes with original paint.
Neutral: The seller, @aegmotorsports, provided additional context about the vehicle's repainting history and confirmed it was refinished in San Marino Red. @MaxAmillion inquired about the timing belt and water pump, while @cwalker985 wanted details about a perceived imperfection on the steering wheel. @tannermark123 and @These6texans requested clearer pictures to assess the paint quality, with the latter expressing concern about 'orange peel' in the photos. @lvbiii pointed out a minor discrepancy regarding the vehicle's features.
Negative: Several comments raised concerns around the repaint job of the vehicle. @maruzo and @p_h both pointed out that the paint looked dull and suggested that there might be issues with the finish. @tannermark123 highlighted signs of overspray, indicating the paint was not from the factory. @cwalker985 was skeptical about the condition of the steering wheel, suggesting more was wrong than described by the seller. The seller acknowledged that the paint has some imperfections and orange peel, explaining that a correction was not done to preserve the integrity of the repaint.
|
 |
Positive: @SSlinkard expressed admiration for the bike, calling it a nice machine. @Jaw969 also echoed a positive sentiment by calling it a beautiful bike and expressing hope to be its future owner. Overall, the bike seems to have garnered positive attention from multiple commentors, with comments reflecting an appreciation for its aesthetics and condition.
Neutral: @dryclutch (The Seller) provided detailed responses to inquiries regarding the bike's ownership history, condition, and included items in the sale. They confirmed that the fairings are original, there is a minor scuff on the tank, and that the service history is well documented. Additionally, they mentioned that the bike has been stored in a climate-controlled garage, which may contribute to its maintained condition, but they also suggested that a tech check might be needed for the belts if the buyer plans to ride it more.
Negative: @Stangar raised concerns about potential scratches, dings, or other disappointments on the bike, reflecting a level of apprehension regarding its condition. Similarly, @Jaw969 inquired about the timing belts and various components' conditions, indicating that there might be underlying issues that need to be addressed, such as age-related maintenance. Overall, while many comments are positive, there are underlying concerns from a few users about the bike's state and history.
|
 |
Positive: @Ejaso describes the vehicle as a beautiful, low-mile example with tasteful modifications, reflecting a high opinion of its aesthetics and condition. @supramkv also echoes this sentiment, calling it a beautiful car and expressing interest in further details about it. The seller, @aaronkirkpatrick, provides clear and responsive answers to inquiries, indicating a level of engagement and professionalism in the sale process. He mentions the inclusion of original parts and additional winter tires, which may add value for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters ask for more information about the vehicle's features and history. @tjdamato84 inquires about the presence of Apple CarPlay, to which @aaronkirkpatrick confirms its availability. Questions about the original parts and potential driving video are raised by @M_thusiast and @baltoboy respectively, showcasing the community's interest in verifying features and performance. The seller addresses these inquiries directly, offering transparency in the sale.
Negative: Concerns are expressed regarding the lack of a DME report, which @supramkv highlights there's no time for the seller to obtain before the auction ends. Additionally, @supramkv questions whether the car has been tuned or if it has seen any track time, reflecting a doubt about its maintenance and performance history. While @aaronkirkpatrick assures that the car has never experienced mis-shifts or over-revs, the absence of detailed reports may leave some potential buyers hesitant.
|
 |
Positive: @clixeen (The Seller) mentions that the car has been recently serviced with fresh oil and filters, as well as a brand new muffler, indicating good maintenance. @clixeen also highlights that the vehicle runs and drives perfectly with only 91,000 miles on it and adds that they will include a complete set of front and rear brake pads and sensors for the new owner, which is a great added bonus to prospective buyers.
Neutral: @mickeybharat inquires whether the car qualifies for emissions for California registration, indicating an interest in the vehicle's compliance with regulations. @dcamp asks for clarification about the discrepancy between the CARFAX reported mileage and the vehicle description, showing concern regarding the accuracy of the vehicle’s mileage. @Zakhan questions if the timing chain was replaced, demonstrating a desire for clarification regarding the car's maintenance history.
Negative: @dcamp's inquiry into the discrepancy between the reported mileage raises potential concerns about transparency in the vehicle’s description. The need for clarity about the timing chain replacement also suggests there may be issues with the vehicle's maintenance documentation. Overall, these questions reflect a level of skepticism among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's history.
|
 |
Positive: @MTGGTC mentioned that the vehicle is a decent low mileage example of a timeless classic, which suggests that the car has good appeal to some potential buyers. @mikeor also expressed confidence in the condition of the vehicle, noting that there appears to be little rust and that the interior and exterior are in great shape, aside from the convertible top. They believe the car, with some mechanical work, could become a valuable low mileage classic, showing the potential for rewarding investment.
Neutral: @texfab2001 (The Seller) responded to inquiries by clarifying that the vehicle was stored for 20 years in a garage, contributing to its low mileage. They acknowledged that no fluids or timing belts have been changed since storage, and though they confirmed the presence of air conditioning, it is not functioning cold. @SjgPjg and @Hexagone raised valid concerns about the vehicle's overall state and asked for additional photos and videos for better assessment, reflecting that potential buyers are looking for more reassurance regarding the car's condition.
Negative: Comments from @getouth highlighted a negative perception regarding the seller's knowledge and communication about the vehicle. They felt that the car was not presented in a manner that did it justice, especially considering the E30 platform's popularity among enthusiasts. @Hexagone also voiced apprehension about the car being a 'mystery box' due to the lack of maintenance history and urged for more detailed photos to alleviate concerns, illustrating the uncertainty potential buyers feel about the vehicle's condition.
|
[/et_pb_code]
|
|