Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed high praise for the 1989 Porsche 911 Speedster, calling it 'legendary' and noting its classic 80s appeal. @Espanolie emphasizes the model's iconic look, predicting that it will perform well in the auction. Similarly, @Jxc888 encourages bidders by describing it as the perfect car and a 'unicorn' in any collection, adding to a sense of excitement around the listing. Commenters like @69_911e appreciate the vehicle's condition, particularly noting the interior's excellent upkeep, which indicates careful ownership over the years.
Neutral: Comments regarding the auction details mention that the seller, @1600veloce, has extensive experience on the platform with over 1,980 listings, enhancing credibility. There was also a clarification from @bringatrailer that the listing has been updated to indicate that the car is being sold at No Reserve, which may potentially increase interest among bidders. The seller has been proactive in addressing inquiries, providing shipping quotes upon request, and promising a thorough process for vehicle purchasing.
Negative: On the negative side, some commenters expressed skepticism, with @whipcity76 questioning why the car hadn't sold previously, despite reasonable numbers. Additionally, @PorscheAir raised concerns about paint meter readings, suggesting some panels might have been repainted, which could affect buyer confidence. Lastly, @skyancher lightheartedly remarked about not being able to purchase the car due to personal financial constraints, hinting that not everyone can engage in the bidding process.
 |
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the 1970 C3 Corvette, highlighting its rarity and stunning aesthetics. @boaboyoz described the car as 'amazing' and 'gorgeous,' while @MartyKC praised its excellent color and noted it combines the LT-1 and ZR-1 features, suggesting it should set a record for Bring a Trailer. @Horns1983 echoed this sentiment, calling it the perfect burnt orange and commenting that it checks all the boxes of a great car. Numerous remarks reflect a shared appreciation, with @Loggedon mentioning the 'fantastic machine and presentation' and @Rippy noting its rarity with only 53 built during that period, which added to its collector status.
Neutral: Several comments provided technical insights regarding the Corvette's features and performance aspects. @YELLADOG and @RowdyRat discussed distinctions between the LT-1 and ZR-1 engines, noting the additional performance options available with the ZR-1. @scotts108 elaborated on equipment included with the ZR-1, such as the M22 transmission and heavy-duty brakes, while @KBonTX referred to the importance of confirming the engine's authenticity through certification, suggesting it would boost the vehicle's sale value. These comments indicate a knowledgeable engagement with the car, pointing out details that could affect purchasing decisions.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback, there were some concerns raised regarding the vehicle's authenticity and condition. User @PatrickVA questioned a discrepancy in the body build date code, while others like @JimCage expressed skepticism about the originality of the engine stamp due to missing broach marks, which could affect valuations. @Fuelieguy also remarked that having the stamp authenticated would eliminate doubts for prospective buyers, indicating a perceived risk among collectors. Additionally, concerns about any winter exposure and corrosion were hinted at by @PhilO, demonstrating the level of scrutiny such a sought-after vehicle undergoes.
|
 |
Positive: Comments surrounding the 2019 Porsche 911 Speedster are overwhelmingly positive, emphasizing its aesthetic appeal and exclusivity. @GDogg highlights the exceptional black exterior with striking yellow accents, describing the car as a 'Spectacular Speedster!' @boaboyoz calls it a 'very bad a$ black 911 Speedster,' showcasing the allure it holds for many enthusiasts. Additionally, @whipcity76 expresses admiration for the model's design, stating it has 'curvy sexy lines' and represents one of the prettiest cars on Earth. The seller, @FinestVehiclesTraded, echoes this enthusiasm, celebrating the car as an 'immaculate and stunning Speedster' and inviting potential buyers to view it in person.
Neutral: There are several inquiries and discussions about the specifics of the vehicle, reflecting a neutral tone. @Jjensen0305 requests information about the build sheet and window sticker, to which the seller responds that the window sticker is absent but they can provide the build sheet. Another user, @s28hero, asks for details about the materials on the seatbacks and their functionality, receiving a prompt reply from the seller indicating the satin finish and foldable nature of the seats. While these comments do not carry strong opinions, they indicate genuine interest in the vehicle's specifications and configuration.
Negative: Negative comments are sparse, with only slight critiques regarding the vehicle's low mileage. @MDN expresses surprise that such a car has been driven so little, while @69_911e shares a similar sentiment regarding another 'barely-driven example,' implying that these cars should be enjoyed rather than kept as artifacts. @Tghooper brings up the disparity in price, hinting at how other models like the #991 might be valued higher, suggesting that there may be some undervaluation of the Speedster in the market. Although these points aren't heavy criticisms, they reflect concerns about the car being underappreciated despite its standout qualities.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the Ferrari F430 Scuderia Spider 16M for its design, history, and features. @FerRrari expressed love for the tricolore stripe over Rosso Corsa, and @Roc9 referred to the car as a 'beauty', sharing their own excitement after purchasing a 16M. Others, like @mike_747 and @howie242, appreciated the detailed descriptions shared by @Raffi, the seller, who emphasized the car's rarity and desirable lineage.
Neutral: Several comments provide informative insights into the vehicle's specifications and its historical context. @Raffi (The Seller) highlighted that the car retains its original items like keys and manuals, indicating a commitment to preserving its history. Additionally, the discussion around the calipers shifted from silver to red, with @denny6.53 and @FerRrari attempting to clarify the reasons behind the color change and its implications on value and desirability.
Negative: The conversation did not lack skepticism and concern regarding the vehicle. Commenters like @mike_747 raised questions about the F1 system's reliability, implying concerns over potential future failures, especially given its low mileage. @twist-a-grip noted a preference for other Ferrari models over the 16M, potentially indicating a divide in collector opinion regarding its place in Ferrari's lineup. @skyancher humorously lamented the price of bidding, reflecting a broader concern about the escalating costs of these luxury vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed overwhelming admiration for the 1957 BMW 503 Cabriolet, highlighting its stunning design and craftsmanship. @997zen simply described it as 'Sweet!' while @trcassidy excitedly noted, 'This lil’ bad boy RAWKS!' @GDogg praised the 'Absolutely sensational' car, specifically mentioning the spectacular blue with white piping in the seats. Many others appreciated the vehicle's unique features and quality, with @tripleblack emphasizing the exquisite engineering details and @rka0507 agreeing on the beauty of the 503 convertible. @brian_cb shared nostalgic sentiments about the charming cold start reminiscent of older vehicles, further confirming the car's allure among classic car enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments focused on questions and clarifications about the car's specifications and authenticity. @Mark635CSieuro requested details regarding the car's interior restoration and its originality, demonstrating a keen interest in the car's history. @DFWcarandtoymuseum asked for additional videos showing the top and windows in operation and sought clarification on the vehicle's original gearbox numbers, showcasing a methodical approach to understanding the model's integrity. The seller, identified as @BMW328NSK, engaged with these inquiries thoroughly, providing information about the car's restoration and original components, including details about customizations and the metalwork done over the years.
Negative: Some comments introduced skepticism regarding the car's authenticity and condition. @KLCBMW raised concerns about the undercarriage and engine compartment colors, suggesting that black paint could obscure underlying issues, and called for insight from the seller on the aesthetics. @JettJolene humorously inferred that previous owners may regret not choosing the more renowned 507 model instead, while @skyancher made a cheeky observation about the car's appearance. Additionally, @DFWcarandtoymuseum pointed out possible discrepancies in invoices, questioning whether they pertained to a different model, which may have shaken some potential bidders' confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @Knuckle47 praises the vehicle, commenting that its color presents beautifully, and calls it a very nice car. @birddoc describes it as a near flawless beauty, ideal for anyone seeking a show car. @7257scottt appreciates the beautiful restoration and acknowledges the investment required for a frame-off restoration, further highlighting the quality of the 1956 model. @65-GTO labels the restoration beautifully executed, noting the car's desirability in color and overall quality, stating it represents something special in the classic car market. @mtenvoorde (The Seller) echoes similar sentiments, sharing that the vehicle shows exceptionally well and has had little mileage since his purchase, expressing confidence that it will appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: There are queries about specific features of the car, such as power steering and brakes, with @mtenvoorde (The Seller) confirming that it has power steering but not power brakes. Comments from @gocorcoran and @mtenvoorde point out the distinction between manual and power brakes. @atomic8 asks about the vehicle's historical specifics regarding transmission and repaint details, to which @mtenvoorde responds with the information he has but admits he lacks specifics on certain aspects, showing a willingness to provide more details in the future.
Negative: @bondgraham expresses a nostalgic disappointment over Ford’s decision to abandon the two-seat roadster format, pondering the potential legacy it could have had if it had continued. @darthmustang lightens the mood with a joke about the car's clock, but it suggests a potential issue with functionality. @georgiamarc voices a personal dislike for the continental kit attached to the car, questioning its removability, reflecting a concern that might deter some potential buyers depending on their aesthetic preferences.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's stunning design and unique character. @trizzuth calls it a standout, saying he absolutely loves it and finds it gorgeous, while @LoudNotFast describes it as a refined Viper, highlighting its beauty. @Palestar refers to it as art on wheels, and @Dake also comments on its beauty and normalcy inside. Others, such as @Steelman1952 and @yamobethere, echo sentiments about its gorgeous appearance, further emphasizing the vehicle's draw as a collector's item. Several users express a desire to see the vehicle in person, noting its inspiring design and the impressive melding of Italian styling with American performance. Overall, the car garners a high level of appreciation across the comments.
Neutral: Some comments approach the vehicle with curiosity and a mix of appreciation and skepticism. @Porsche1931 notes uncertainty in his feelings about the car, while @AlfaDave provocatively claims it's more of an Alfa with a Viper engine than a true Viper. @trusted_one entertains the confusion that might arise regarding its identity, humorously speculating about insurance issues. @TMerv raises questions about Alfa Romeo's contribution to the vehicle beyond the badging. Meanwhile, a number of comments delve into technical aspects or historical context, suggesting an intricate relationship between the manufacturers and the design elements involved. While these contributors acknowledge the vehicle's beauty, they also question its provenance and what it represents in the automotive landscape.
Negative: Critique of the vehicle comes largely from users dissatisfied with the interior design elements and branding issues. @MPGHAHA points out that while the car's exterior is gorgeous, it disappointingly contains cheap switchgear typical of lower-end Dodge vehicles. @VenaGT shares this sentiment, suggesting the contrast between the luxurious exterior and the interior's apparent Dodge heritage may detract from its overall perception. Additionally, @Hywyflyr expresses frustration regarding the use of branding and badge engineering, feeling that the ultimate identity of the car is muddled. @pinshaw similarly dismisses it as not much of an Alfa and expresses a preference for the Zagato coupe, implying that the car's engineering origins dilute its intended appeal. Overall, these comments reflect a shared concern regarding the vehicle's authenticity and the potential compromise of its luxury status by certain design choices.
|
 |
Positive: @Lonnberg praises the vehicle as amazing and expresses enthusiasm comparing it to Bobby Ewing. @garagekeptmotors (The Seller) engages with the bidders, thanking them and sharing that there's a driving video available for enjoyment. @skyancher reminisces about owning a similar model in the past, describing it as a "very nice survivor" and sharing personal memories associated with the car.
Neutral: @Tyota9 expresses love for the car while requesting the removal of chrome wheel arches, indicating a desire for a small modification while still appreciating the vehicle's overall beauty. @Rhino_01 inquires about the car's history over the last 20 years, showing interest in its background, while @garagekeptmotors (The Seller) provides details about how the car has been cared for and maintained in a showroom setting during its ownership.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle. The discussions have focused on admiration and inquiries about its history, indicating a generally positive sentiment surrounding the car.
|
 |
Positive: @Jags_in_the_barn praises the vehicle as vastly underrated and immensely fun, highlighting its superior handling compared to earlier models. @drivedahills shares similar sentiments about the vehicle's enjoyable driving experience and bulletproof engine, confirming it as one of the best he has owned. Additional comments from @Tom_S. and @Mghamms describe the car as a swell example of the GT6 generation and praise its handling and mechanical integrity.
Neutral: @dzguy and others request more detailed photographs covering various aspects of the car, indicating a desire for transparency in the listing. @dfoley (The Seller) addresses several queries regarding the car's condition, parts, and various installations, affirming the car's sound mechanics and detailing recent upgrades. The comments suggest that while there is significant interest in technical details, the overall perception of the vehicle is positive.
Negative: There is tension in the comments surrounding the sale, particularly between @Speedygonz and @dfoley (The Seller) regarding a request for a personal viewing of the car. @Speedygonz argues that the seller's refusal to show the car is not reasonable for potential bidders, while @dfoley (The Seller) cites personal reasons for not accommodating the request. This conflict highlights concerns about the transparency of the sale process and buyer-seller interactions.
|
 |
Positive: @Gary_T1 admires the styling of the Goldwings, noting how Honda has made significant improvements over the years. @T-weed (The Seller) shares that new Avon Cobra Chrome tires have been installed recently, enhancing the bike's handling. @T-weed also expresses satisfaction with the bike's performance during long rides to locations like Sturgis and the Colorado River, suggesting a comfortable and enjoyable experience for riders.
Neutral: @WinstonWolff raises a question about the absence of cruise control, which might be an expected feature for a touring bike. @artreality humorously refers to the bike as a "Hondaminium," emphasizing its spaciousness while playfully suggesting it needs more amenities. @ajohnce inquires about the installation of the lowered link in the suspension, indicating they require extra legroom but without a strong bias either way.
Negative: @skyancher expresses disappointment regarding the lack of cruise control, sarcastically commenting on the bike's amenities by suggesting it should include a microwave. @ruracing1 questions the presence of cruise control, implying confusion about the bike's features. @T-weed (The Seller) clarifies that the bike is a sportier version of the standard Goldwing and explicitly states that it does not include cruise control.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the aesthetic appeal of the Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud III, with @berfinroy noting the exceptional trim work that defines quality in these cars. @Barryward highlighted it as a "Great cloud" while @Dollycat3 described it as absolutely stunning, referring to its elegant color combination and luxurious feel. @caozman and @BMcD humorously referred to the car's association with James Bond and the film "Goldfinger," emphasizing its classic and eye-catching design. The seller, ClassicPromenade, emphasized the car's restoration quality and suitability for both tours and shows, appealing to classic car enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments reflected a mix of admiration and curiosity about the specific details and history of the vehicle. @VirginiaC sought further clarification on the model characteristics between Rolls and Bentley, while @Oat provided needed distinctions between the S series and Clouds. @Vauban requested information on the car's paint and woodwork condition, which ClassicPromenade addressed by confirming that the paint has minor wear and the woodwork is in great condition overall. @HHClark shared his driving experiences with the vehicle and provided insights into its performance and maintenance history, noting its suitability for casual use and events.
Negative: Contrasting viewpoints emerged regarding the restoration quality and overall condition of the vehicle. @Pennoak expressed skepticism about calling the car a fully restored example, suggesting that while it may have undergone some aesthetic improvements, significant work was still needed for a proper restoration. @mari1 cautioned potential buyers to closely inspect the car for rust, citing the vehicle's northern history. @2_veloce and @PMC1924 criticized the color discrepancy between photos and real life, while @Lbanter pointed out the lack of underside photographs in ads, which could be a concern for serious buyers wondering about the car's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Chamba expresses his enthusiasm for the vehicle modification, stating it was the best upgrade ever, reflecting on a friend's successful pedal swap on a similar model that lasted 15 years. Additional comments from @JCyrus57 highlight the vehicle's visual appeal, calling it a beautifully done red machine. @Z282SLO compliments the car's overall condition, noting how well the paint and interior have held up over 36 years and recounting the added excitement from the modifications, particularly the 5-speed switch.
Neutral: @modular46, the seller, provides detailed information about the vehicle, including the offer of the original automatic transmission and shifter at no extra cost. He clarifies the mileage, the history of the paint, and the performance of the car, ensuring potential buyers understand its excellent condition. There are inquiries from users like @jsadamski and @FordNutt about specific mechanical aspects, demonstrating engagement and interest in the vehicle's specifications and history.
Negative: There are mixed feelings regarding the modification of the transmission, with @Caz1 expressing disappointment that a 44,000-mile car was altered and suggesting that many might prefer the original automatic setup. @MrRealtorAz raises concerns about potential repainting and rust issues, which @Z282SLO defends as misunderstandings typical of lesser-informed viewers. Overall, there seems to be a divide among enthusiasts about the appropriateness of altering such a classic vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong endorsement from @ExclusiveMotorClub regarding the 2016 Porsche Cayenne, describing it as an exceptionally clean and well-maintained vehicle. @ExclusiveMotorClub highlights its beautiful driving experience and mentions recent maintenance work including a fresh oil change, new motor mounts, and a new A/C blower motor, all contributing to its excellent condition. Furthermore, they emphasize their confidence in the vehicle's readiness for its next owner, encouraging potential bidders to participate in the auction with assurance.
Neutral: In the dialogue, @ExclusiveMotorClub mentions that the tires date codes are from 2024, indicating that they are relatively new. They also address concerns about the service records by acknowledging @B.Bear's comment about the lack of service documentation for the previous 60,000 miles. @ExclusiveMotorClub clarifies that they do not know the reason for this gap but suggest that not all service centers report their work to Carfax, providing a possible explanation for the limited service history available.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's service history arise from @B.Bear who questions why there are so few documented service records for the last 60,000 miles. This raises a potential red flag for buyers who prioritize a thorough service background when purchasing a pre-owned vehicle. Additionally, @ExclusiveMotorClub acknowledges a problem with the visibility of uploaded paint meter pictures that were supposed to demonstrate the original paint, indicating some lapses in communication or documentation that may concern prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the vehicle, often referring to its unique design and function. @Boaboyoz called the FV106 Samson 'bloody brilliant' and @Kurt_T noted it must be a 'blast to drive around in', showcasing the enjoyment it could bring to its owner. @Nigelt933 shared insights about the driving dynamics and features, highlighting that it's 'fun' and can even 'spin on the spot,' making it versatile and engaging for drivers. Many comments reflected a light-hearted tone, with @PWSchuh and @SomeZguy discussing how it could make everyday errands more entertaining, while @Maureen expressed creativity in how to justify buying this unusual vehicle to his wife.
Neutral: Several comments shared practical information about the vehicle, indicating it is not legal for road use and discussing the lack of a title. @3Pedalonly pointed this out while others, like @Jneuenburg, speculated about its street-legal potential in different states. @Bulletmotorsportsinc provided details about the vehicle's features, including it being equipped with a large fuel cell designed for ease during storage. The presence of storage fees and the option for shipping were also noted, providing potential buyers with a clear idea of the logistics involved in purchasing this armored recovery vehicle.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding the vehicle's classification and legality for street use, as evident from comments like @Pbf777 pointing out that calling it a 'tank' might not be entirely accurate. @Smlobx raised questions about the thickness of the armored hull and its material, leading to some confusion after receiving mixed responses from the seller @Bulletmotorsportsinc about whether it was aluminum or steel. Additionally, commenters like @Beans_Bacon noted potential issues with road rage implications, highlighting the vehicle's imposing presence and how it might affect interactions on the road.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters enthusiastically praised the vehicle, particularly its aesthetics and the fact it stands out as a classic model. @Wolfenhaus loves the look, while @GatorDMD and @InsatiableAmos showcased similar sentiments about its beauty and the iconic metallic silver color. @Caymanorcarrera even suggested getting personalized 'Bidnerds' plates to celebrate the bid, highlighting the excitement around the auction. Additionally, @Frida noted the car's historical significance, remarking on its special status within the Porsche lineage as a collectible and how the early 3.0L models provide a unique driving experience. The vehicle's potential as a future investment was also a recurring theme in multiple comments.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the specifics of the auction and functionality of the car without strong emotional overtones. @Thibaut inquired about viewing the car in person, displaying a vested interest in experiencing the vehicle prior to bidding. @thehunt asked practical questions about the vehicle's performance, specifically about the notchy transmission and the possibility of a driving video. @Type44 expressed curiosity regarding the auction's current trajectory, questioning what new developments could emerge. The seller, @BidNerds, provided detailed updates about the auction including final viewing opportunities and reminders on how to contact them ahead of closing time, fostering engagement within the bidding community.
Negative: A few comments highlighted minor imperfections in the vehicle. @Frida pointed out that certain small details, such as missing headlight washers and a plate under the whale tail, needed to be addressed to achieve a 100% period-correct restoration. @thehunt's query about the notchy transmission implied potential concerns about gear performance, echoing common apprehensions about older models. However, these critiques were minor in comparison to the predominance of positive or neutral feedback, indicating that overall, the car is well-regarded despite its few shortcomings.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express appreciation for @Kenbob23's service as a disabled veteran, showing empathy towards his situation with hand tremors that have hindered his ability to complete the vehicle. @CPC specifically acknowledges his service and expresses sympathy for his struggles in finishing the project. This sentiment of support is echoed by others who appreciate the challenges he faces.
Neutral: Several commenters are asking for additional information regarding the vehicle's condition and whether it is operational. @CallmeCarlos inquires if the vehicle is in a running state and whether all drive components are connected. @Lawomack also asks if it cranks, highlighting a general concern for understanding the vehicle's current status without offering overt opinions.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about specific issues related to the vehicle. @CPC points out a potential problem with the hood based on a photo, suggesting it may have a bend. @buckeyerob shares experiences from his own project and hints that there might be structural issues with the hood, indicating possible complications in the vehicle's build. @Kenbob23 confirms that the wiring harness is not installed and the drive shafts are missing, revealing the unfinished nature of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle's attractive styling, particularly noting it as a significant improvement over older models like the 970. One user, @bigdogandy, highlighted its overall aesthetic appeal, while @jdeville shared their positive experience with a similar Panamera, emphasizing its comfort and smooth performance. Additionally, @Orangecarguy expressed satisfaction with their purchase from the seller, indicating the car was well-maintained and accurately represented, reinforcing the quality of the vehicle being sold.
Neutral: There were inquiries about the car's ownership history, with @qskid2 seeking clarification on a discrepancy between the Carfax report stating 1-owner and indicators suggesting 3 owners. The seller clarified that sometimes dealer transfers or administrative updates can be counted as new ownership events, despite the vehicle staying with the same buyer. Commenters also discussed minor cosmetic damages and maintenance records, noting some superficial issues like seat indents and minor scratches, which the seller addressed by reassuring that these were not serious problems.
Negative: Concerns about mismatched tires were raised by @MDolphin and @MCTECH, suggesting potential reliability issues, especially for an all-wheel-drive vehicle like the Panamera. Additional doubts were expressed regarding the wear and tear visible in the interior, with @chucks97ss pointing out seat damage and signs of pet hair. Moreover, @Greasem0nkey questioned the nature of a minor accident referenced in the Carfax report, seeking clarity on whether the vehicle's overall condition had been compromised, while others noted discrepancies in service records leading to skepticism about whether all necessary maintenance had been performed.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the overall aesthetic appeal and luxurious history of the Cadillac Seville. @Barryward expresses fondness for the vehicle, noting it as an excellent example of classic luxury. @goldengup (The Seller) enthusiastically shares detailed anecdotes about the car's provenance, emphasizing its low mileage, well-documented history, and connection to a beloved family figure, Alice Maguth, enhancing its value. @MasterDebator and others acknowledge its gorgeous design, while @Dollycat3 appreciates its controversial yet striking appearance, reinforcing that it remains a subject of admiration. Additionally, @MartiniMike sees it as a prime example of taste and quality, urging potential buyers to bid confidently on it.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle’s mechanical condition and special features provide a balanced view. @garysandiego inquires about the engine's reliability, referencing common concerns with the 4.1L engine but noting that @goldengup (The Seller) reassures potential buyers of its regular maintenance and current operability. The history shared by @goldengup (The Seller) about previous care and ownership elicits responses that focus on the car's charm rather than just performance metrics, with @neilpierson25 and @Electraglider appreciating its styling and driving experience. There’s a recognition among commenters of the unique qualities this model holds and its significance in the Cadillac lineup.
Negative: Skepticism arises predominantly around the car’s mechanical reliability due to the 4.1L engine. @garysandiego raises concerns regarding any potential issues while @Irhmsd mentions hearing a squeaking noise in the engine video, prompting questions about maintenance. Furthermore, @Type44 reflects on the polarizing perceptions of the Seville's styling, hinting that some critiques may stem from its engine performance rather than its design. While many find it beautiful and a worthy collectible, the vehicle's performance history makes some bidders cautious, as seen in @Irhmsd's own past experience with an 85 commemorative model that was less than satisfactory.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are enthusiastic about the vehicle, highlighting its rare and beautifully restored condition, with @dgclassiccars emphasizing its significance as a collector's item. @rustyfiat appreciates the fact that the vehicle has been kept entirely standard, suggesting that it maintains its original value and charm. The car's ASI Gold registration further adds to its appeal, making it a coveted addition for any classic car collection.
Neutral: Some comments focus on logistical aspects of the sale, such as @josehbraga05 inquiring about the duration the car can be kept in the garage after the bidding concludes. This indicates that potential buyers are considering practicalities related to the purchase process and ownership, demonstrating a serious interest in acquiring the vehicle.
Negative: There are no negative comments recorded about the vehicle in the provided discussion. All comments reflect a general appreciation or logistical inquiries rather than any form of criticism or negative feedback about the car itself.
|
 |
Positive: @Pennoak expressed a deep appreciation for the biplane, reminiscing about a similar aircraft they once encountered during an estate valuation. They articulated both a fondness for the plane and the disappointment faced when they realized they could not accommodate it in their barn due to size constraints. @Collins4A also commented positively on the Stearman, highlighting its beauty and even complimenting an MGB, adding to the admiration for the vehicles involved.
Neutral: @19Willys46 made a straightforward inquiry regarding the state of the vehicle, questioning what qualifies it as a project aside from the fact that it has been inactive for 30 years. Their comment seeks clarification more than it expresses a strong opinion, indicating an interest in the specifics about the vehicle's condition or potential.
Negative: @EdFried made a tongue-in-cheek remark questioning whether roller skates were included with the sale, implying a sense of skepticism about the practicality of the vehicle's usability. This comment carries an undertone of negativity or doubt regarding the vehicle's condition, suggesting that it may not be ready for use in a conventional sense without additional equipment or modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @shelbyhertz2006 described the vehicle as the perfect car for enjoying scenic areas, highlighting its appeal for leisure use. @PineIslandPorsche expressed appreciation for the vehicle's features and the Race Ramps, emphasizing its aesthetic qualities as well. @enthusiastic_enthusiast (The Seller) conveyed their excitement about hosting the auction for this 'beautiful LR4', assuring potential buyers of their commitment to transparency and effective communication about the sale process.
Neutral: Several commenters, such as @menked and @travisbeer82, inquired about the financial aspects of the vehicle, specifically what remains owed. @Nolimits3 sought clarification about the accident history, and @79skyjock raised a question about potential maintenance issues related to the coolant system, reflecting a shared interest in the vehicle's background. @enthusiastic_enthusiast (The Seller) diligently responded to these inquiries, providing information about the loan status and accident details, including that it was a minor fender bender, which seems to satisfy some concerns.
Negative: @hisstory expressed confusion regarding the open $1900 loan on the vehicle, suggesting that it would have been more practical to pay it off before auctioning. @volvo268 criticized the service records provided by the seller, stating they were not informative about the vehicle's maintenance history. This feedback indicates a level of skepticism about the seller's transparency and raises concerns over the vehicle's condition and service documentation.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle, noting its unique style and impressive power. @CobraVic11 appreciated how the car does justice to the song 'Hot Rod Lincoln,' and @TommyBruin called it "extremely cool." @Electraglider highlighted its powerful engine, describing it as a "torque monster," while @rickaz pointed out the significant boost in horsepower from its original configuration. @MikeAuc, the owner, shared enthusiasm about the car, detailing a seven-year build process and a total investment of $170K, further amplifying its allure.
Neutral: Several users showed interest in the details regarding the car's paint colors and construction. @Energy7 inquired about paint codes for future bodywork, while @MikeAuc responded that he possesses small samples of the colors used. @crownconcepts (The Seller) confirmed that all build records are meticulously documented, assuring prospective buyers that information would be readily available. Additionally, @ivdjt requested more interior images, indicating a desire to see more of the car's features.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about the vehicle's height and adjustment features. @0311Jarhead questioned why the rear of the car sits high and asked if there were ways to lower it. While there weren't widespread negative remarks, specific feedback like this suggests the possibility of needing adjustments to meet potential buyers' expectations. Overall, there were no major complaints presented, but such inquiries highlight areas of curiosity that may require clarification.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a lot of admiration from various commenters. @2ndgearstop described it as a "gorgeous car," capturing the beauty of the classic Beemers from that era. @dewilhite1948 echoed this sentiment, praising the design and color combination, reminiscing about wanting one during the mid-80s. @motroman called it a "unicorn" for its well-preserved original leather dashboard, and @BenjieInKC expressed sheer delight at the overall condition of the E24, highlighting the color, the interior, and the engine, while wishing luck to the future owner. Additionally, @PjTarini found it stunning and noted the collectible nature of these cars, while @fluxwrap simply stated, "What a beauty!"
Neutral: Several comments bring attention to significant details and modifications that are worth noting. @rwb1950 (The Seller) provided a comprehensive overview of the car's condition, mentioning that it is a rust-free specimen and detailing the upgrades that have been made, including the replacement of the suspension and the installation of stylish 17” wheels. He also acknowledged the mileage issue due to an odometer failure, stating available documentation of fueling records to support transparent ownership history. Comments from @E28E34 pointed out the possible imperfections in the dash trim and the interesting fact that the window breaker switch was installed upside down, which could be seen as typical wear for an older model.
Negative: Concerns about the car’s air conditioning system were voiced by several commenters. @ahsmaroon mentioned that owning a classic vehicle often comes with maintenance challenges, emphasizing that addressing the A/C leak might be more complicated than simply requiring service. @rwb1950 (The Seller) confirmed that the A/C works but has a leak and noted that finding the appropriate refrigerant has been a struggle, which could deter potential buyers seeking trouble-free ownership. Furthermore, @bobshm shared insights on the car's previously poor sales performance and depreciation issues, suggesting that some collectors might still have reservations about its long-term value despite its current appearance and condition.
|
 |
Positive: The comments praise the vehicle's stunning appearance and performance, with users expressing strong admiration for its design and driving potential. Users like @Cmdr430 called it "beautiful," while @bmwe30m3guy noted its authenticity, remarking that it is the "real deal." Enthusiasts highlighted the car's rarity and historical significance, underscoring that it represents a unique piece of automotive history. Comments such as @boaboyoz's reference to the car as "magnificent" and @mserpe's reflection on the driving experience capture the passion the community has for the M3 Evo II.
Neutral: Some users have raised points about the vehicle's condition, mentioning evidence of paintwork not discussed thoroughly in the auction. For example, @nkochary indicated that significant repainting is sometimes overlooked, and @Dashdog noted concerning signs like bubbling paint and non-original details. While some potential buyers are excited, others express caution about the condition and lack of detailed and transparent history of the car's maintenance and modifications. These discussions revolve around the balance between appreciating the vehicle's charm and ensuring due diligence for potential buyers.
Negative: Conversely, several comments express skepticism regarding the vehicle's auction representation. @TYB17 provided a detailed list of concerns, including improper fabric on the seats and non-original parts, raising doubts about the overall authenticity of the auction claims. Other commenters, such as @Dashdog and @Uk215m3, echoed these worries, questioning the seller's transparency about the car's modifications and condition, suggesting that significant repairs may be needed. They voiced that the vehicle, while special, does not meet the expectations of a pristine collector's item, potentially undermining buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @2002WS6 commented on the fun driving experience of the car, while @sopwey expressed a long-standing love for it, particularly appreciating its five-speed and classic interior. @CobraKyle05 (The Seller) highlighted that the car is the cleanest Del Sol he has ever owned, perfectly maintained with numerous upgrades. @Marc_C reminisced about past ownership of a similar model, praising the D16Y8 engine, and @lvbiii emphasized the joy of driving a Del Sol with the top off, indicating that the vehicle delivers high smiles per gallon. @Greasedog shared a heartfelt connection to the car, stating it as the best he has ever owned and a promise to pass it to his daughter.
Neutral: Several users, including @DSS10 and @Hawksmith, offered compliments about the car's condition and inquired about its features, such as the timing belt replacement and engine specifications. @vwlove54 asked for details comparing the motor to a higher horsepower version. @91crxtacy raised questions about the rim authenticity, prompting a detailed response from @CobraKyle05, who provided information about the original wheels and shared images from a brochure to clarify their authenticity. Meanwhile, @rjr59AH discussed his previous experience with a Del Sol, noting that the car looks amazing, despite having concerns about his own budget in the bidding process, as shared by @KyleFN.
Negative: Concerns arose related to the authenticity of the car's wheels, with @91crxtacy pointing out that they may not be factory-original, which could impact the vehicle's appeal for purists. @rjr59AH criticized some insulation found in the car, suggesting it resembled a mouse nest and recommended it be cleaned out by the seller. Additionally, @2do_mr2 expressed a mix of temptation and caution, noting a flaw spotted in the car's detailing, which could indicate a lack of thoroughness in presentation despite overall positive feedback. Finally, @1974_911S shared his decision not to bid on the vehicle, citing a preference for an automatic model, which implied that not all prospective buyers were convinced to bid on the current listing.
|
8k-Mile 2003 Chevrolet Corvette Coupe 50th Anniversary Edition 6-Speed
1G1YY22G535101374
Lot 203081
Dealer
 |
Positive: Commenters rave about the stunning appearance and unique features of the 2003 Chevrolet Corvette Coupe 50th Anniversary Edition. @Scheidecker describes it as 'gorgeous' and recalls the beauty of his own convertible version. @crazyshot97 expresses excitement about the vehicle, noting its desirability and encouraging others to watch the auction. The seller, @Jpreston123, highlights the car's impressive history, low mileage, and the stunning color combination, emphasizing its potential as a collectible investment. Commenters appreciate its clean condition and the allure of owning such a limited edition model, with @Rynohd sharing that he owns a similar car and values its factory stock status.
Neutral: While many comments are positive, some questions arise regarding the car's maintenance history and optional features. @gmx282 inquires about the dealer-installed environmental protection package, to which @Jpreston123 responds with detailed information. @AmosHarrison raises concerns over the absence of maintenance records in CARFAX, leading to discussions about the condition of the tires and fluids. The seller assures bidders of the car's overall excellent state despite its age, responding to concerns with transparency and professionalism, indicating the seller is open to trades as well.
Negative: However, there are cautions noted by some commenters regarding the vehicle's age. @OldsRocketMan questions the appearance of potential scratches in a photo, prompting @Jpreston123 to clarify the excellent paint condition. @7257scottt expresses skepticism about dealer add-ons designed for profit margins and highlights concerns over the 'theft protection system.' Furthermore, @Rynohd stresses the importance of modern tire safety, suggesting that the vehicle's original tires may need replacement due to their age, which might deter some potential buyers who prioritize safety over originality.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their appreciation for the car's aesthetics and upgrades. @mlesko73 highlighted the vehicle's attractive color and wheels, particularly noting the appeal of convertibles and the desire for top-down photos to showcase the car's features. @shelbybuff, identifying as a long-time Mustang owner, remarked on the updates and modifications that could potentially make the car easier to upgrade for performance. Overall, comments in favor of the vehicle focused on its general appearance and the enjoyable driving experience it promises.
Neutral: A number of inquiries regarding the car's condition and history were raised, indicating a mix of curiosity and caution among potential bidders. @REE2 and @JCCP both posed questions related to the door data tag and repair history, while @davek1661 suggested that clarification on the car's usage and any recent maintenance would be beneficial. Additionally, @Dmcagle08 inquired about the vehicle's suitability as a commuter, to which @Naschneider (The Seller) responded positively, emphasizing the car’s reliable performance. Questions about the car's title status and other operational specifics were also noted, creating a balanced discussion around the vehicle.
Negative: Some commenters exhibited skepticism and voiced concerns about the vehicle's condition and history. @rust1 raised issues regarding the title's 'corrected type' and sought confirmation about the operation of various gauges, demonstrating hesitance to trust the seller without thorough evidence. @ArchieMI questioned the seller's credibility by inquiring if they were a dealer, and expressed reluctance to proceed with bidding due to numerous unanswered questions. Furthermore, @Vailgt350 commented on the need for more detailed photos and a good picture of the VIN, suggesting apprehension about the vehicle's documentation and overall transparency from the seller.
|
 |
Positive: @Gary_T1 noted that not many S2 Cab models were made, highlighting the rarity and desirability of the vehicle. @mrbucz218 expressed an interest in estimating his own similar vehicle's value by checking the auction details and asks relevant questions about maintenance. Additionally, @Eblesson appreciated the detailed information provided by the seller regarding potential issues and modifications, showing a serious interest in the car's stock condition.
Neutral: @jonaspmurphy (The Seller) shared insights on the vehicle's condition and service history, indicating that while the convertible top is manual and the odometer is currently inoperable, there are no major signs of wear based on a mechanic's evaluation. There was a timeline mentioned regarding the last known mileage, suggesting the vehicle has been garage-kept and infrequently driven, as indicated by reports from the previous owner. The seller provided reassurances about the car's performance and mentioned the inclusion of stock wheels and accessories in the sale.
Negative: Concerns about the odometer's accuracy were raised by @Spokayman, questioning the discrepancy between the mileage reported in the auction and what the seller reported. Additionally, @RudyR requested more information on the service performed, including machine shop details for significant work done on the car. The presence of rust mentioned by @Davepnola and the inquiries regarding the car's overall condition point toward potential worries about the vehicle's exterior appeal and mechanical reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express excitement and appreciation for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its performance and driving experience. @AMack6 mentions a positive driving experience with their own 911 T, and @mmhoss concurs, describing the car as fun and enjoyable. @boaboyoz admires the unique design of the yellow Carrera T, and @911dan praises the vehicle's balance and joy of driving, suggesting it has provided an enjoyable experience for him with 3000 miles driven. The seller, @mkim1, also emphasizes the care that went into customizing the vehicle and its storage, further enhancing its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: There are several neutral inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifications and condition. @VestedHoldings requests a window sticker, indicative of wanting to see more detailed information. @Speedy4 raises questions about the remaining factory warranty, while @wlporsches asks about any annual maintenance services completed in the last two years. Additionally, @amirsahe and @samsnj question registration compliance in California and clarify the car's ownership status respectively, prompting helpful responses from the seller about the car’s emissions compliance and the unique ownership situation.
Negative: Concerns about the car's mileage are expressed, particularly by @ctk339, who finds it surprising that the vehicle has only traveled 249 miles in a few years. @911dan similarly questions the low mileage, implying it could affect potential value or interest. Moreover, @samsnj raises a concern about the two-owner situation in the CarFax report, suggesting potential confusion or issues that bidders may need clarity on. Overall, while the vehicle is largely praised, these questions indicate some uncertainty that could make potential buyers cautious.
|
 |
Positive: @Bigolbagger (The Seller) highlights the car as a unique project, describing it as a 'blank canvas' ready for personal customization. Many commenters agree with this sentiment, expressing excitement about the car's potential as a project. @BigPlanDan appreciates the distinct rear windows, calling it a 'sinister look' that adds to its charm. @Valiantjim acknowledges the rarity of such vehicles and the opportunity for creativity, suggesting that a unique rear window treatment could be an interesting personal touch that sets it apart at car shows. @mrbtoo- shares a positive impression of the car, stating that it has a cool appeal and will provide great enjoyment to its future owner.
Neutral: Comments regarding the rear window design indicate mixed feelings among potential buyers. @Pistol_Pete comments on the original method used to modify the rear window, noting the skill required for a proper finish. @Bigolbagger (The Seller) acknowledges that while the current design can be changed, it presents an opportunity for the buyer to personalize the car to their liking. @Sunbeamdon shares a nostalgic story about their own car project experiences, implying that while there is much work left to do, the car will go to a passionate new owner.
Negative: Some comments express concern about the practical aspects of the car's customization, particularly the rear window. @Pistol_Pete and @BigPlanDan both express disappointment with the current rear window trim, indicating that it may detract from the car's overall aesthetic if not addressed. @kuya shares a personal anecdote of losing a similar car to poor handling, reflecting a sense of sadness about the car's potential fate if not cared for properly. Overall, while the vehicle’s customization offers options for creativity, the execution of those customizations may be viewed as either a downside or an opportunity by different commenters.
|
 |
Positive: @JKinTX (The Seller) expresses a strong affection for the XK, describing it as a gem that he is already missing. He highlights its aesthetic appeal, the growling sound of the engine, and the attention it attracts. Additionally, @Braga1407 praises the car as a gorgeous Jaguar. The seller also provides valuable information, mentioning that the heated seats are both heated and air-cooled, which adds to the comfort and luxury of the vehicle. @JKinTX shares videos of the car to showcase its condition and performance, demonstrating transparency and willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Neutral: @ieharris raises questions regarding the frequent replacement of coolant parts, to which @JKinTX responds, stating that the dealer indicated the issues were due to the plastic nature of some components. @ck1710 contributes by explaining common cooling system issues with the 5.0L engine, adding that the car is robust and that replacement of components at some point is expected. There is a general consensus that while these replacements are concerning, they are not unusual for vehicles of this age and make, and buyers can consider the upgrades positively if the right parts were utilized during repairs.
Negative: @ieharris notes the frustration surrounding the frequent need to replace parts and wonders if the dealer provided any solid reasons. Concerns about past repairs lead @onlyoriginalcars to inquire about any lingering smells within the vehicle, suggesting the need for the car to be in pristine condition to ensure no unpleasant odors impact its sale. Similarly, @cscmanagement brings up potential timing chain and tensioner issues, indicating apprehensions about reliability in the model, though @JKinTX claims to be unaware of any such problems.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed interest in the unique color and design of the vehicle. @BabyD69 found the slime green option to be intriguing, while @axelrider called it awesome and expressed desire to own the truck. @Daytonadogie praised the vehicle's clean appearance following the LS swap. In terms of functionality, @AtoBcruiser (The Seller) confirmed the presence of heating and AC, and provided detailed information about the truck's restoration and mechanical condition, including good compression readings across all cylinders.
Neutral: Several comments from users inquired about specific features and history of the vehicle. @npramuk and @GTstyle raised questions about the car's history in film and its registration status, respectively. @Sweli posed detailed inquiries about the engine and the condition of various components, reflecting a genuine interest in understanding both the mechanics and the vehicle's overall history. @AtoBcruiser (The Seller) responded to these inquiries, providing technical details about the engine and drivetrain, including the transmission's condition and mileage, as well as mentioning that the vehicle had previously been registered in California.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle were mainly focused on its aesthetics and legal compliance. Multiple users criticized the tailpipe design, with @Assam describing them as hideous, prompting @AtoBcruiser (The Seller) to acknowledge the feedback and promise to address the issue. @FW_BRONC noted the unusual exhaust setup, while others questioned the vehicle's CARB compliance due to missing components like the catalytic converter. @Gegrie raised doubts about whether the smog systems had been detached, indicating uncertainty about the vehicle's legality for use in California.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlighted the beauty and desirability of the Lamborghini Jalpa. @GDogg described it as a "great looking Jalpa" and expressed best wishes, while @Surfdwn shared fond memories of their past Jalpa, stating it was a "blast to drive" and attracted a lot of attention. @ARF appreciated the Jalpa's design over its Ferrari counterparts, mentioning it as a "lovely example." Several commenters, including @specialkjupiter and @1lotus1, also reminisced about their own experiences owning Jalpas, conveying excitement about the car's distinctive characteristics and the nostalgia it evokes.
Neutral: Comments from @TheGonz (The Seller) provided valuable insights about the car's condition and history. He mentioned that the Jalpa is a rare breed, with only 410 produced, and that this particular model has seen long-term enthusiast ownership. Additionally, @TheGonz addressed inquiries about the car's specifications, including the status of the AC system and the inoperative speedometer, assuring potential buyers that they would recommend repairs as necessary. General inquiries from users like @Mjsizemore asked about the sound of the vehicle with the mufflers removed, indicating interest in the driving experience.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about specific aspects of the vehicle's condition. @10sbums inquired about the inoperative speedometer and whether the valve stem seals had been addressed, highlighting the mechanics and potential issues that could influence a purchase decision. @safulop mentioned that the AC system might need repairs, which could be a deterrent for some buyers. Additionally, some users expressed skepticism or sought clarity on the quality of the repaint job, with @10sbums specifically asking if it was done thoroughly, which indicates an ongoing concern about the car's maintenance and presentation.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz expressed enthusiasm for the F355 Spider, praising its stylish appearance with a black over tan color scheme. @theforce88 agreed, calling it a beautiful car and wishing luck to potential buyers. @Mtairyauto and @RemingtonSR71 shared similar sentiments, with @RemingtonSR71 highlighting the Spider's outstanding driving experience and value, noting that it offers a traditional roadster feel compared to larger modern variants. He also commented on the Spider's structural advantages and potential for long-term value appreciation.
Neutral: @ghealey (The Seller) mentioned plans to upload a driving video in the future and addressed inquiries regarding valve guide replacements and age-related maintenance, indicating uncertainty about whether these were done under factory warranty. @flomofo requested more details on maintenance work, including exhaust and suspension components, while @eyeman1234 expressed concern about non-response to service record inquiries and questioned the seller's commitment to communication, receiving a reply from @ghealey explaining his limitations as a private seller without paint meter access.
Negative: Some comments indicate frustration with the seller's communication. @eyeman1234 was disappointed by the lack of response to his service record questions and highlighted the seller's limited experience from previous sales. Overall, there seems to be a slight concern regarding transparency and responsiveness from the seller, which may affect trust among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Truck7600 (The Seller) shares that Madison, a 1968 c10 "shop truck," has been a delightful project worked on during the pandemic, featuring modern upgrades alongside its classic look. He mentions that he has driven the truck approximately 5000 miles, enjoying the reactions of people when they see it perform. Commenters like @McRosacci note its beauty and the expertise of the owner, with sentiments that it might be out of reach financially but will be a great acquisition for someone. @Vicnice69 expresses admiration for the truck's color and seeks advice on building a similar vehicle, which further highlights the truck's appeal to other enthusiasts.
Neutral: Throughout the comments, @Truck7600 (The Seller) communicates a friendly and open demeanor, welcoming inquiries and sharing details about Madison's performance, including fuel efficiency and modern features. He implies readiness to accommodate potential buyers by offering to show the truck to @cwigley and is proactive in responding to questions and bids. Other commenters engage in light-hearted banter and express interest in the auction, with some taking notes on the truck's modifications and performance details, indicating that the discussion remains professional yet casual.
Negative: While the comments are largely positive, there are hints of disappointment, as @McRosacci reveals they cannot afford the truck, and @mfmfm mentions a longing for a manual transmission, suggesting that some potential buyers find the truck unattainable or not fully fitting their preferences. Additionally, while @Truck7600 mentions issues being worked out over time, inherent in project vehicles, this undercurrent of potential complications may deter some enthusiasts. Overall, this creates a slight tension between admiration for the vehicle and the realities of ownership and price range.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments for its aesthetic appeal, with @revracer describing it as a beautiful car. Additionally, @Cdn043 praised the quality of the build, highlighting the Holley Sniper EFI as a significant advantage. @JMHarley06 remarked on its overall attractiveness, noting that despite its minor issues, the car is indeed very nice. Diagonal adjustments to the exhaust system were noted to be manageable, further underlining the car's additional fun factor as mentioned by @Masonpauls.
Neutral: Comments related to the vehicle’s specifications have generated discussions about its classification, with @jjschuler acknowledging that the car is likely a MK1 or MK1.5 given its production date and details pointed out by @mrmustang. There was also mention of the emissions status in Colorado, where @jjschuler confirmed that the car, being an ASVE, does not require emissions testing, which is a positive aspect for local buyers. The seller has engaged with the community by providing clarifications and additional information about the car's specs and previous ownership.
Negative: Concerns about cosmetic issues were raised by several commenters, with @JMHarley06 warning potential buyers about rivets protruding from the hood, suggesting that it would need replacing or repainting. @Race6777 also mentioned the appearance of a repaired paint chip, indicating potential hidden damages. Furthermore, @shelleysolaris inquired about the absence of fasteners for a tonneau cover and a possible lack of additional items included with the car, indicating some apprehension regarding completeness and preparation for buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received commendations for its fantastic color combination, specifically noted by @gscharnagl and @georgepehanick. The seller, @Williamjweiner, emphasized the car's outstanding performance and comfort, having previously owned a high-performance AMG GTc. He describes the B&O stereo as providing an optimal sound experience, enhancing the overall appeal of the car. Additionally, the seller assures potential buyers of the excellent condition of the seat functions and the absence of any significant damage, which reflects positively on the vehicle's maintenance history.
Neutral: Several comments from potential buyers, like @Jcwiza, @LuvMeAniceCar, and @Nacoocheejohn, demonstrate interest in specific features of the vehicle, including inquiries about Apple Car Play and inspection of potential paintwork on the front fender. @Zack33 has requested a video demonstration of the convertible top's operation, which indicates practical consideration for functionality. @pomis raised a question about the maintenance status of the hydraulic ABC suspension system, while @PBSp inquired about the vehicle's smoking history, which @Williamjweiner clarified, asserting it was never smoked in.
Negative: Concerns about minor cosmetic imperfections were noted, particularly by @Jcwiza, who pointed out potential stains on the seat and scratches on the console, prompting a response from @Williamjweiner that both issues were removable and not significant damage. @Nacoocheejohn's request for paint meter readings indicates apprehension regarding the vehicle's paint history. Furthermore, @Jcwiza requested additional maintenance documentation to assure bidders of the vehicle's condition, showing a level of skepticism towards the seller's claims about the vehicle's total state.
|
 |
Positive: @TomPayne describes the vehicle as a beautiful example with a classic color combination and expresses his fondness for the green interior. @Scott68GTO finds the lady far more classy, suggesting that the car exudes elegance. @Type44 appreciates that the 2 spoke steering wheel is correct for a late Shadow and admires the inclusion of a wood steering wheel as a replacement, indicating a preference for more refined aesthetics in cars of this caliber.
Neutral: @JBAdams provides detailed comments about the paint, noting that the vehicle is actually Silver Sand and mentions a misspelling on the original build card. He highlights historical details about the 75th Anniversary Silver Shadow IIs, explaining their specific paint color and branding features. @marcvr38 mentions adding a 2 spoke steering wheel that could potentially be the original from when his father bought the car, raising interest regarding authenticity.
Negative: @Lbanter comments that although the vehicle looks like a clean original, bids are appearing to hold back, suggesting hesitation among potential buyers. @Type44 humorously critiques the 2 spoke steering wheel, comparing it to something from a British semi truck, indicating a preference for higher quality components in luxury vehicles. @JBAdams also points out a potentially concerning modification where the hydraulic reservoir cover was painted, noting the adverse consequences as it can remove paint.
|
 |
Positive: @bbiela (The Seller) has shared insights about his 2003 G500 Overlander, fondly named Gunther, highlighting over four years of ownership and adventures spanning from Austin to Chicago and Utah. The seller emphasizes meticulous maintenance with included service records and a detailed Excel spreadsheet tracking all known records. Commentators praise the truck's performance, character as a rugged outdoors vehicle, and performance upgrades, mentioning that it is well-prepared for adventures. @littlehandegan and @Mjakaaj compliment the seller’s presentation and vehicle care, while @jbski16 acknowledges its standout presence on the streets.
Neutral: Several comments appreciate the environment in which the vehicle has been used, with @mfontaine2008 pointing out the scenic beauty of Utah and suggesting that the new owner should explore the area upon acquiring the vehicle. @bbiela (The Seller) agrees, noting the proximity to stunning landscapes like the Uinta Wasatch National Forest and Wasatch State Park. Additionally, the selling process is viewed positively, as @bbiela (The Seller) interacts with potential buyers and encourages questions while sharing the vehicle’s unique off-road capabilities.
Negative: No negative comments were noted regarding the vehicle or the selling process, with all feedback received being favorable, highlighting the truck’s appeal and the seller's thorough management of the auction process.
|
 |
Positive: @jturner expressed excitement stating that this vehicle is a dream car. The inclusion of a black soft top, as mentioned by @backley, is another appealing feature for potential buyers, and photos have been provided to showcase this aspect.
Neutral: @wschmidt1 (The Seller) confirmed that the vehicle has been stored in their garage since they acquired it. They noted that there is no hard top available for the car and provided assurance that there are binders containing the judging sheets as requested by @LINY, with pictures attached as well.
Negative: @LINY requested pictures of the jack, tool, and spare tire, which may indicate a concern regarding the vehicle's accessories. Additionally, @vettguytom inquired about the front license and bumperette assembly, hinting at possible issues with completeness, although @wschmidt1 (The Seller) reassured that the full assembly is available, which is a positive note.
|
 |
Positive: @CASCADE1 praised the car for its meticulous record-keeping, noting that the dealer never once made a mistake in mileage entries sent to Carfax during service. Fans of the vehicle, such as @SimplyAnEnthusiast99, are enthusiastic about the car's seats, while @MaqKnife offered a simple compliment, stating, "Nice." There is appreciation for the car's excellent frost interior noted by @Cbrf3, who fondly remembered having the same in a previous model.
Neutral: @devispeed911, the seller, clarified that the rims on the car are indeed from a newer model 350Z and mentioned that the previous owner upgraded to OEM Nissan rims. The seller is also addressing concerns raised by various commenters about the TPMS light being on, stating that it will be checked by a mechanic. There is speculation from @Cbrf3 about the vehicle's service history, expressing concern over the high number of visits for service relative to its low mileage and the lack of retained documentation like the window sticker.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the alignment of the rear hatch, with multiple users, such as @BERTTZ and @Nph12, pointing out significant gaps in photos and questioning if it is due to a hatch misalignment after the wheels were changed. @Cbrf3 and @Nph12 expressed skepticism regarding the overall condition and history of the car, drawing attention to missing records and noting that the door armrest tops are prone to scratching. There is also inquiry from @Wheelhouse69 regarding leaks and the state of the fluids, to which @devispeed911 confirmed no leaks exist but admitted to uncertainty about the previous owner's maintenance actions, focusing instead on recent oil changes and checks.
|
 |
Positive: @bstock1227 (The Seller) confirms that the vehicle has never been raced or taken to the track, ensuring its integrity for serious buyers. The seller also indicates there are no head gasket issues or leaks, and that they have the hard top available, suggesting a well-maintained condition overall. Further, the seller states that they possess all the maintenance records available since acquiring the car, providing transparency for potential buyers.
Neutral: Comments from @chrispychickens and @metooo reflect a common interest in verifying the vehicle's history, including questions about maintenance records, tire date codes, and any known issues like leaks. They also inquire about the hard top, aligning with general buyer expectations for documentation and comprehensive information before making a decision. Other inquiries from @elvisizer and @Jaschneider21 regarding the original wheels and potential rust indicate a detailed interest in the car's physical condition as well.
Negative: @Jszttxxj expresses a particularly critical and raw sentiment about the vehicle's engineering, implying it lacks refinement and sophistication, deeming it more of a brute force machine than an elegant sports car. Their description highlights a potential drawback for buyers seeking a finely tuned vehicle as they describe the driving experience as dangerous and chaotic, rather than controlled. Additionally, @trussdevils' query about bodywork or repainting indicates concerns regarding any past issues that may not be readily visible, hinting at potential hidden problems.
|
 |
Positive: @Thatll_Buff_Right_Out.... mentions that this is a great opportunity for any riders out there named George, suggesting a unique connection or allure to the vehicle. The seller, @tomslickone, provides information about the bike's history, stating that it was registered in 1993 and he acquired it from George Foreman in December 2023 with only 2,298 miles, which may enhance its value as a collector's item.
Neutral: @parshooter notes the absence of a grill, which could be an important feature or aesthetic element for potential buyers. @kasindy shares an interesting tidbit regarding George Foreman's motorcycle collection, specifically mentioning the bike's custom paint and the significance of the cheeseburger graphic, hinting at its cultural relevance.
Negative: @Charliejones408 raises a valid point about the seller's relationship with the bike, questioning why it's being sold after such limited use and implying concerns about trustworthiness. @HHRider inquires about the source of an oil leak, which could indicate potential maintenance issues, while @Hdrking1998 expresses skepticism regarding the proof of ownership by George Foreman, indicating a lack of confidence in the bike's authenticity.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has been well-maintained and stored indoors, which has preserved its solid condition. @lennie_Lawson, the seller, notes that the car has only minor cosmetic flaws and still performs like a new vehicle, with excellent clutch and braking responsiveness. The tires were recently replaced with new Continentals of the correct factory sizes, ensuring that the car is ready for driving. Additionally, the seller has been proactive in providing thorough answers to potential buyers' questions, including verifying the presence of the hard tonneau cover and the alignment checks performed on the vehicle.
Neutral: There have been questions from potential buyers regarding specific features of the car, such as the availability and condition of the hard tonneau cover, which @lennie_Lawson confirmed is included and in great shape. Furthermore, @1996SupraTT has inquired about a physical inspection of the vehicle and expressed a need for the alignment results after the recent service. @stevefi12345 also contributed by locating the Ford dealership for further reference, indicating that interested parties are actively engaging in the auction process.
Negative: One concern raised was about the vehicle's inspection history, as @Batfan2 pointed out a failed wheel alignment noted in a linked Carfax report. This raised questions about whether corrective actions had been taken, to which @1996SupraTT expressed a desire for clarification. Although the seller is committed to providing alignment results and remedial documentation, the initial mention of prior issues may cause apprehension among buyers regarding the car's overall care and maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered significant enthusiasm among commenters, particularly MOPAR and HEMI fans who appreciate its rarity and classic appeal. @Symbolic_International highlighted the car's unique features, including its colors and options, which make it a standout among only 250 built. Several commenters voiced strong admiration for the Charger, with @nhartoonian jokingly saying they would bid their 'kidneys' for it, and @Cmarion52 noting that its value is remarkable for a HEMI. Praise continued with @ccam8252 describing it as the 'sweetest, baddest, nicest stanced Charger' and expressing delight over its green color, which many felt was striking and handsome.
Neutral: The comments also shared insights and experiences related to the vehicle's features and specifications. @RammJaeger requested more driving videos to showcase the performance, while @djimbe reflected on the appealing interior. @BadAzp contributed knowledgeable insights on the standard features of 1966 Chargers, explaining that the Sure Grip was commonly ordered. Other enthusiasts discussed the car's value in relation to its hydraulic lifters, with @Cmarion52 arguing that most buyers would not notice the difference unless they broke down the engine. It was acknowledged that hydraulic lifters eliminate the need for regular lash adjustments, making them practical for a street-driven vehicle.
Negative: However, there were some criticisms and concerns raised, particularly regarding the vehicle's specifications. @caozman pointed out past discrepancies in disclosures about the hydraulic lifters, causing concern about accurate representation. @BadAzp debated claims of the car being a unique one-of-one model, arguing that certain features were standard in 1966 Chargers and that the rarity should be qualified in a different manner. Some commenters also expressed a desire for more detailed videos, including demonstrations of the light-up instrument panel, with @lunchbocks2002 emphasizing that it is considered one of the coolest designs made. Overall, while there is strong admiration, there is an undercurrent of caution and the need for clarity regarding specifics.
|
 |
Positive: @GPMCMAHON praised the promotional video for the vehicle, suggesting it might win an academy award. @Aaron expressed nostalgia for a similar vehicle he owned and suggested that this car could make for an excellent hillclimb car as-is. @pbf777 highlighted the car's simplicity and availability of parts, emphasizing its historical significance as a sports car and suggesting that restoring classic cars shouldn’t be solely about financial return. Meanwhile, @ljb80 (The Seller) was appreciative of supportive comments from potential buyers and acknowledged the need for transparency.
Neutral: @morganplus8 remarked that the car deserves restoration but questioned the skills of younger generations in undertaking such projects. Comments from various users suggest that while some see potential in restoring the vehicle, many have concerns about the practicality and financial sense of such a venture. @rogerw1 mentioned that evident issues will emerge during restoration, while @Dbran6172 noted that the car could be enjoyable to drive in its current condition, yet a restoration may be more fitting.
Negative: @lewisfoto was surprised that the auction site agreed to a reserve for the car, labeling it a winter project. @Fez indicated a lack of demand among younger car enthusiasts for this type of vehicle, whereas @morganplus8 raised doubts about whether anyone currently possesses the skills necessary to restore a car like this. @pbf777 criticized the approach of viewing restoration through a financial lens, questioning the future of vintage car restoration given current labor and interest levels.
|
 |
Positive: @paddyofurniture recently shared a pleasant experience traveling to Santa Catalina island, highlighting the Samurai's popularity due to its compact size and expressing surprise at their daughter's newfound infatuation with it. @BobSea (The Seller) expressed appreciation for @paddyofurniture's bidding interest, mentioning that he bought the Samurai two years ago for his wife and stating that it runs great and is in overall good condition. Several commenters, including @CHS_Karl, acknowledged that these vehicles are durable and quite fun to drive, noting their scarcity in the market.
Neutral: @wahoowolfe inquired about the originality of the paint and functionality of vehicle components, while @Gyme confirmed the paint is original and noted the absence of air conditioning. @CHS_Karl provided an in-depth commentary on the vehicle’s carburetor and its significance, emphasizing the need for accurate descriptions in listings. This generated some clarification from @BobSea (The Seller), who responded thoroughly about the condition of the vehicle and adjustments made for the carburetor based on community feedback.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @CHS_Karl regarding the mischaracterization of the carburetor as a replacement when it was actually described as a kit. @Gyme echoed similar concerns regarding the absence of a catalytic converter, pointing out potential issues with California emissions regulations, which could hinder legal operation. Additionally, @Gyme noted the need for longer videos of the vehicle's operation after requests were made during a previous auction, pointing out a shortfall in visual documentation of its capability.
|
Original-Owner 2004 Ford Excursion Limited Power Stroke 4×4
1FMSU43P84EB11865
Lot 203100
Private Party
 |
Positive: Several commenters have praised the truck, noting it as a very nice specimen and a "beast of a rig." @Longmire45 expressed confidence in the truck's performance, while @Crozz highlighted the impeccable detailing. The seller, @ag13, appreciated the positive feedback and confirmed that the vehicle was driven primarily by his wife and was a non-smoker unit, further boosting its desirability. It seems the truck has been well cared for over the years, contributing to its positive reception.
Neutral: Some inquiries were made regarding the truck's specifications and history, such as fuel tank capacity and maintenance records. @RCSCSP asked about the fuel tank size, to which @ag13 responded that it is roughly 44 gallons. @Gonemotoring also inquired about maintenance records, especially concerning the engine and freeze plugs. The seller confirmed that there were no significant issues except for a minor oil leak from the oil pan gasket, indicating a level of transparency regarding the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some commenters about potential rust on the rockers and electrical issues within the truck. @cbrenn71 noted that the rockers might show signs of rust, while @RCSCSP asked about any electrical problems, to which @ag13 responded that there had been none except for a radio repair done years prior. Additionally, @Spudsy requested a cold start video due to known issues these motors can have, indicating some apprehension about the truck's reliability despite its age.
|
 |
Positive: @Caymanorcarrera expressed enthusiasm for the 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, noting its nearly original condition aside from a few minor updates like the shift knob and radio. Their excitement reflects a genuine appreciation for this specific model, particularly its rarity as a slicktop. @Theweaponx echoed this sentiment by praising the car's quality after having it serviced by @Steve_McQueen's mechanic, highlighting that it drives wonderfully and has a glossy paint finish indicative of careful maintenance. @JesseR added to this by commenting on the desirability and performance benefits of slicktops, confirming his positive experiences buying similar models from the seller.
Neutral: @Steve_McQueen, as the seller, provided key information about the vehicle, including its auction context and current ownership. He also explained the advantages of the slicktop design, such as weight savings, reduced maintenance concerns, and a more streamlined appearance, which might intrigue potential buyers. Additionally, @Knuckles-R-Busted asked about the specific desirability factors of slicktops, receiving informative responses from @Steve_McQueen and other commenters, thereby sparking constructive discussion about the vehicle's features.
Negative: While there were no overtly negative comments about the vehicle, some potential concerns were alluded to in discussions regarding the slicktop's maintenance and desirability compared to sunroof models. The remark from @Bleedsblue, while not critical, indicated a personal grievance with headroom issues in sunroof models, suggesting that the slicktop could be a better fit for taller drivers. Furthermore, while @Steve_McQueen noted minor cosmetic issues like a disfigured bumper trim strip, they clarified that the overall quality of the vehicle is solid, indicating there are aspects that may require attention.
|
 |
Positive: @pjwertheim (The Seller) highlights the elegance of the 2011 Range Rover HSE Lux stating that it spent most of its life in Naples, FL and has no accidents or repainting, maintaining an all-original appearance. The vehicle has received new Michelin HP Latitude tires, indicating that it has been well cared for. @Topnote adds that this model year is considered best in class, confirming the vehicle's respected status among enthusiasts. Other commenters, like @ceovirus, appreciate the stunning color of the vehicle and note common aging issues like a sagging headliner that are considered easy to fix.
Neutral: Questions from potential buyers are being answered by @pjwertheim (The Seller), who confirms that the instrument cluster is functioning properly and there are no fluid leaks or issues with the suspension. Specific inquiries such as the replacement of the air suspension compressor and the presence of a trailer hitch were addressed positively, providing potential buyers with reassurance about the vehicle's condition. The seller also shared details about the cost for headliner repair and showed willingness to provide additional videos to assure buyers of the vehicle's functionality.
Negative: Concerns have been raised by commenters like @enzos regarding the condition of the headliner and possible electrical issues indicated by the instrument cluster's behavior. @JoshAtPlay questioned the timing chain noise and the condition of the air suspension, leading to an atmosphere of scrutiny around potential repairs. Additionally, @ceovirus mentioned discrepancies in the fuel door's appearance, wanting further confirmation on its condition, indicating that there are still unanswered doubts surrounding various components of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @ricedgar, presents the vehicle positively, describing it as a 'beautiful 2016 Mercedes CLS400.' They invite potential buyers to ask questions during the auction, demonstrating open communication and a willingness to engage with interested parties. The clear location of the car in Palm Springs, CA, is also included, which can be appealing for local buyers or those willing to travel to see the vehicle.
Neutral: @ricedgar provides detailed information in response to inquiries, which adds to the transparency of the sale. An initial question from @sdrcp about a potentially replaced wheel sparked clarification when @ricedgar explained that only the tires were replaced and that there had been confusion regarding an invoice. @bringatrailer confirmed the removal of previous mention about a wheel replacement based on the seller's clarification, indicating ongoing adjustments to maintain accurate information in the listing.
Negative: Some confusion arose regarding the vehicle's condition, primarily related to the wheel situation, which @sdrcp brought up. Initial assumptions about the wheel being replaced were clarified, but misunderstandings may have affected potential buyers’ perceptions. Overall, the need for clarification about the vehicle's maintenance history could lead to concerns about transparency in the sale.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have generally expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting its appearance and performance. @Blizzard340 complimented the bike's color, recalling a previous experience with the chrome yellow pearl Sportster '72, while @HankDerb shared his love for the XL1200S model, praising its adjustable suspension and unique features that made it a fun ride. Additional comments expressed a desire for videos showcasing the bike in action, signaling excitement for its performance capabilities.
Neutral: Several commenters requested more information regarding the bike's condition and maintenance history. @GLWA and @HankDerb asked for details about maintenance carried out during ownership, with specific inquiries about the engine, electrical systems, and any prior oil leaks. @Maxwell6 (The Seller) attempted to engage with potential buyers by offering to send videos of the bike running and answering questions, though not without some confusion about video uploads.
Negative: There were a few concerns raised regarding the bike's maintenance and overall condition. @rjmars noted that the last registration plates were from 2006, suggesting it might have been sitting for an extended period. @MichaelB pushed back against clarity, displaying skepticism about the bike's condition by indicating he wouldn't ask the seller about leaks or old tires. Additionally, there were questions about the bike's controls and their impact on riding comfort, with some expressing doubts about the setup.
|
 |
Positive: @dangme55 expressed a strong affection for the vehicle and highlighted its impressive aesthetic appeal, stating that no pictures can capture its true beauty. He described it as a 'head-turner' and emphasized that it drives exceptionally well, noting the impeccable condition of both its interior and paint. He also appreciated the extensive maintenance the seller has performed on the car, encouraging prospective bidders not to miss out on this opportunity. @rwatford echoed similar sentiments, admiring the color combination and optimistic about the vehicle's longevity after the replacement of parts.
Neutral: The seller, @Sendell, provided detailed information regarding the vehicle's maintenance, confirming that the transmission was replaced along with other components using OEM parts, and addressed inquiries about certain features like the after-market satellite radio. He also mentioned the presence of a lifetime subscription to Sirius radio for the original setup and transparently communicated about the maintenance records, assuring prospective buyers that the oil has been changed annually. Furthermore, he clarified that the car has been stored indoors and only driven occasionally in winter conditions.
Negative: @ulflei raised concerns about the comfort and accessibility of the back seats, noting that while they are in perfect condition, they may not be ideal for long trips. @clean_machina questioned the functionality of the aftermarket satellite radio and the history of oil changes since the last recorded service in early 2022, suggesting a lack of recent documentation might be a red flag for potential bidders. Additionally, @rwatford inquired about the type of vacuum lines replaced, hinting at possible worries over whether the seller opted for the original or upgraded versions, emphasizing that this detail could significantly affect the vehicle's perceived value.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting it as a beautiful build that showcases attention to detail. @58Charcoal and @SDCR appreciated the visual appeal of the car, noting that its paint job is stunning and it has good aesthetics. Users like @mike_rockwell and @cad58Y praise the craftsmanship and well-executed design, suggesting it stands out among similar vehicles. @PSFarm and @Knappster noted the comfort and spaciousness of the cabin, indicating that it accommodates taller individuals well, and several users requested driving videos, implying a desire to see it in action, which indicates a high level of interest in its performance.
Neutral: Several commenters raised inquiries about specific features and performance details, reflecting a mix of curiosity and admiration. @Piros1 asked about the rear differential and driving comfort, while @Al_Swearengen inquired about the functionality of locks and wiper motors. @tritfright4 wanted clarification on various components, including the radio and tire condition, showing active engagement in learning more. @Umpti-Fratz (The Seller) was attentive to these requests, frequently providing updates and answers, which showcases a commitment to transparency regarding the vehicle and its status.
Negative: A few concerns were echoed by some users regarding the vehicle's condition and specificity of parts. @KMBCars pointed out a potential alignment issue with a wheel, and @griz99005 wanted more information about the electrical systems, expressing some uncertainty about the radio's functionality. Additionally, @tritfright4's confusion about the headlight housing suggests a need for clearer images or descriptions. The inquiries indicate that while the overall reception of the vehicle is positive, there are lingering doubts about certain mechanical and electrical aspects, which could affect potential buyers' decisions.
|
 |
Positive: @Zand4re (The Seller) mentioned that the car has had nearly $59,000 in service completed, which many commenters, including @mikelaca, appreciated as it provides peace of mind regarding the car's maintenance history. @AriGold23 praised the vehicle's service history and color, indicating it enhances the car's value. @mikelaca also highlighted the extensive options in this 'S' model, which surpass many Macan Turbos, and emphasized the impressive value given the completed repairs and remaining warranty.
Neutral: Comments included inquiries about the warranty, with @BarryLyndon asking about the potential for an extension, while @no.radar and @keithfitz affirmed they were still friends, noting the importance of having warranties during ownership. The @Zand4re (The Seller) provided assurance that the car was fully sorted and ready to be enjoyed worry-free, responding to questions about inspection requests and shipping assistance.
Negative: Several comments raised concerns over the $59,000 service cost, with @rmurphy1990 questioning whether those costs were purely maintenance-related. @whcheney expressed skepticism about the transmission replacement, suggesting it should have lasted longer. Additionally, @thestig pointed out an alignment issue between the front bumper and hood, questioning the history behind it and suggesting the possible cost of repairs if it was indeed due to improper assembly during maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments reflected an appreciation for the vehicle's unique value and heritage. Despite differing opinions on the pricing, some enthusiasts acknowledge that classic vehicles like the 29 woody carry significant charm and potential for collectors. @LarryLaPatka expresses amazement at the valuation, suggesting a general understanding of the vehicle's worth in the classic car community.
Neutral: There were comments that seemed more contemplative, focusing on the peculiarities of owning and maintaining such a classic. @LoggerDan noted a particular behavior regarding engine revving, hinting at a common curiosity among car enthusiasts about engine care. This perspective appears to be more about the culture surrounding classic cars rather than a direct reflection of the vehicle's quality or performance.
Negative: However, there were some criticisms regarding the valuation and practices associated with owning such vehicles. @LarryLaPatka posed a challenging question about the perceived worth of the vehicle, questioning whether the price reflects it justly or if it indicates potential overvaluation. In addition, @LoggerDan's comment suggests skepticism about the proper care of classic engines, highlighting a concern for proper maintenance, which can be crucial for vehicles of this age.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm about the auction, with @angushopper and others praising the return of old-school BaT style, suggesting it adds authenticity to the listings. @kuya mentioned that the vehicle appears mostly complete, indicating a sense of optimism for restoration. @GPC566 (The Seller) emphasized the quality of the engine rebuild, highlighting a significant investment and reassuring potential bidders about the condition of the body, which appears straight with only surface rust on some panels.
Neutral: Some users were focused on gathering more information about the vehicle and its components. @Tomer inquired about the missing upholstery and interior parts, while @ClassicDivision and @Super7Driver asked about the presence of suspension parts and differentials. @Timegrinder and @Hervey_Engineering seemed interested in the restoration process, discussing different approaches and the costs involved, which reflects a practical concern among bidders regarding the scale of the project.
Negative: However, there were also some skeptical remarks. @johnnyb11 remarked on the perceived value of the engine as low, indicating a lack of confidence in the offering. @imanut2 pointedly expressed disappointment over the absence of a driving video or cold start, suggesting the presentation could be improved. Additionally, comments such as @angushopper's request to flag unconstructive comments and @GPC566 (The Seller) having to continuously clarify details indicate that some users were frustrated with the conversation quality and clarity surrounding the auction.
|
 |
Positive: @98WS6 appreciates the Arctic White color, describing it as sharp, while @gregryba commends the car's beauty. @C4geek mentions the car's recognition, with people admiring it on the roads. @zyal8r states that the ZR-1 looks clean and well-preserved, with particular attention to the engine condition, suggesting it has been regularly used. Comments such as those from @C4geek reinforce the sentiments of admiration expressed by others, emphasizing the car's impressive state and the seller's efforts. @Dfrakes2 (The Seller) provides detailed information about the car's keys and service history, noting the rarity of the vehicle.
Neutral: @Fellscreek raises questions about the service history of the vehicle, indicating uncertainty about its past use. @adamfam inquires about the delamination issue with the windshield, signaling that it's a common concern among owners. @Dfrakes2 (The Seller) acknowledges this concern while providing answers regarding the car's keys and functionality. Comments regarding the Bose stereo system by @Jefferylu98 confirm that it works properly, suggesting that the vehicle is maintained well in its electronic aspects. @Dfrakes2 (The Seller) engages the community by offering to add more photos of missing factory items, showing responsiveness to potential buyers' interests.
Negative: @C4geek points out possible delamination in the windshield from specific images, and others like @jad2015 express concerns about the tires, suggesting they might be outdated. @adamfam seeks clarification on removing delamination and learns from @gregryba that the only solution is a windshield replacement, which presents complications as parts are hard to find. This reflects the car's potential needs that might deter interest. @viper808 humorously notes the complexity of needing two keys for full power, but the light-heartedness also indicates a lack of seriousness regarding this technicality.
|
|
|
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 1974 Porsche 914 2.0, with @Segura911 calling it a beautiful car, and @skl48 appreciating the aesthetic changes like removing the bumperettes. @TheDVS1 highlighted the fun memories associated with this model, indicating a nostalgic connection. Additionally, @IXXINut praised the engaged response from the seller, who is actively addressing inquiries and providing numerous photos of the vehicle, which many found reassuring. Another positive note came from @Buyingformywife, who noted the extensive photo collection shared, making the auction experience more detailed for prospective bidders.
Neutral: There were several inquiries regarding the technical details and history of the car. @rituximab asked about its original sale and repainting history, while @Buyingformywife pointed out potential modifications to the heating system and called for more photos of the engine underside. Various users, including @Roadie8 and @Ted_P, requested clarifications about the mileage and any potential registration issues due to its current out-of-state title status, showing a mix of caution and interest from potential buyers. @bobforman provided details from their previous ownership, sparking a discussion on the car's history and modifications.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's condition based on provided images. For instance, @Buyingformywife noted some peculiarities in the engine bay's setup, suggesting modifications that might confuse the next owner. @1911WcLp commented on misalignments of the pop-up headlights, questioning whether they could be adjusted, which elicited mixed responses. @roosterabbydog flagged the presence of the car on Craigslist at a different price, leading to discussions about potential irregularities. Lastly, some users felt there was a lack of sufficient clarity regarding the overall condition and some poor-quality photos that left important details obscured.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the 2009 Cadillac DTS, highlighting its desirability due to features like massaging front seats, a premium audio system, and the exceptional low mileage. @ArtistFox referred to it as one of the best DTS models available on the market, emphasizing its collectibility. @1Marauder, who owns a similar model, described the car as incredibly comfortable and capable on long drives, noting its smooth power delivery from the NorthStar V8. The vehicle was also praised for its clean styling and luxurious options, with @A7534 expressing a strong appeal to Cadillac enthusiasts.
Neutral: Some comments featured questions and observations about the vehicle's condition and specifications. @Davidehaut inquired about the original fluids, while @JB1971SX noted that the low mileage could deter potential owners from driving it regularly. @Dennis25 confirmed that Bluetooth technology was included in this 2009 model, indicating a thoughtful approach to modern connectivity, while @89lincolntc raised a concern about taking such a low-mileage car out on the road, suggesting it might be better suited for a collection rather than daily driving.
Negative: A few comments pointed out potential drawbacks of the vehicle. @JB1971SX voiced concerns about certain maintenance challenges, like the need to drop the bumper to change a headlight bulb, and issues with cruise control functionality, which he found troublesome during hilly drives. @JB1971SX also expressed some reservations about the perfect driving position and noted that despite finding the car appealing, his family preferred other options. Additionally, @89lincolntc expressed guilt over driving such a pristine example, suggesting that it might lose its 'factory fresh' status with regular use.
|
10k-Mile 2016 Ford Transit 350 HD High Roof 15-Passenger EL Wagon
1FBVU4XG4GKB01856
Lot 203114
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciated the overall quality and ride comfort of the Transit 350. @CarFoolLane shared a positive experience of a friend who transitioned from an E-350 to the Transit, highlighting its improved ride quality, seat comfort, and absence of squeaks or rattles. @TNGuy praised the van's utility, pointing out its substantial towing capacity and potential for customization, indicating that it could serve as a versatile platform for various activities. @maw06 acknowledged its practicality despite a lack of visual appeal, stating it looked useful and well cared for, while @SpeedDemonJr. expressed excitement over its dually configuration.
Neutral: Comments made by @TangoDelta1 (The Seller) provided a thorough overview of the van's maintenance history and features. The seller outlined the vehicle's preparation for sale, including recent servicing and the provision of keys, manuals, and DVDs. Several commenters sought clarification about the vehicle's lien status and other features like the driveline and seating adjustments, with @stoat and @GrumpyPants44 receiving responses from the seller. @LayerCake inquired about whether the vehicle was AWD or RWD, to which the seller confirmed it was RWD.
Negative: Some commenters expressed disappointment over specific features of the van, such as a lack of cruise control, which @jumpingjack noted was surprising for a vehicle likely to be used for long highway drives. @Bertazzoni raised concerns about an open recall regarding the driveshaft, while also inquiring about the vehicle being smoke-free, leading to a confirmation from the seller that it has never been smoked in. Additionally, @pearlmacd questioned the adjustability of the rear seats, indicating some dissatisfaction with the van's seating features.
|
 |
Positive: The @car_lister is enthusiastic about selling the SLK 320, highlighting the joy and companionship the car has provided over nearly 20 years. They invite potential buyers to inquire further about the vehicle and express confidence that it will be appreciated by its next owner. Additionally, @MotorManToo commends the car as a 'cracking' choice at the current bid level, indicating interest and positivity about the value of the vehicle.
Neutral: Responding to inquiries, @domingo_santo asks about the condition of the roof covering, while @car_lister explains the repair done to the headliner, noting its current textured state. @ddama1 describes the car as pretty at first glance but raises concerns that it seems to have been driven hard. The seller reassures potential buyers by mentioning that the inspection revealed issues that are fixable, emphasizing the importance of transparency in the sale process.
Negative: On a less favorable note, @mbb867 shares a personal experience expressing frustration with their own Mercedes SLK, describing it as a 'service nightmare' and and suggesting that the car can mask deeper issues despite low mileage. The @car_lister acknowledges this concern and contrasts it with their own experience that the SLK 320 has been reliable, suggesting their vehicle may not have the same problems. Overall, there are hints of skepticism towards the car's reliability from previous owners, as seen in @ddama1's comments.
|
 |
Positive: @Rorin67 compliments the vehicle, referring to it as a "very nice anniversary edition" and highlighting its beautiful color combination. @Shoovel expresses enthusiasm for a cold start and drive video, indicating interest in the vehicle's performance. @EuroSpec93 (The Seller) addresses @msgallin's inquiry about a potential fender protector in photo 31, confirming it is indeed a protector and not paint damage, while also promising a cold start video soon.
Neutral: @WilsonianTheBarbarian asks about any modifications made to the cam chain tensioner, indicating a need for more specific technical details regarding the vehicle's maintenance history. @EuroSpec93 (The Seller) responds to inquiries, showing engagement with potential buyers and willingness to provide information about the car's condition and features. This highlights an ongoing conversation about the vehicle's specifications.
Negative: @Aircooled964 shares a negative experience regarding the seller, mentioning undisclosed defects in the car that led to persistent leaking fuel lines. The comment expresses frustration and indicates impending legal action, warning potential buyers to approach with caution. This suggests that the seller may not always provide complete transparency about the condition of the vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the customer service from @casciomotors, particularly @bprgroup who expressed appreciation for the prompt and transparent replies regarding the vehicle's status post-theft recovery. Potential buyers like @Jimmy_Gator were pleased to learn that the vehicle is equipped with Apple CarPlay, highlighting its modern features. @Jusaur noted the vehicle's pristine appearance, indicative of its well-maintained condition, which would be attractive to interested buyers.
Neutral: Responses in the comment section included inquiries about various aspects of the vehicle, showing a range of interests from potential buyers. @Fmp1971 asked about the extended service/maintenance plan, while @BuzzardBait sought information on the availability of Android Auto, indicating common buyer concerns regarding technology features. Additionally, @casciomotors provided clarifications about the original window sticker and reassured potential buyers about the vehicle's maintenance history following a recent inspection.
Negative: There were some comments that implied skepticism about the vehicle's history. @Finished remarked humorously on how the first owner drove the vehicle for a substantial distance before walking away, hinting at potential concerns regarding depreciation. Meanwhile, @anthonyjp implied that the first owner's departure from the vehicle might also relate to issues with credit. These sentiments reflect a cautious attitude among some commenters about the vehicle's past and the implications it could have for future ownership.
|
 |
Positive: @Sarki refers to the vehicle as an "indestructible Toyota truck" with low mileage, highlighting the 5-speed manual transmission as a nice feature. @SupraFreak agrees, mentioning that these trucks last forever. @VTDavid notes it is a "great simple truck" with appealing features, while @Greatwhite97 calls it a beauty. @JBS1961 (The Seller) emphasizes the well-maintained condition of the truck, detailing its history as an Idaho vehicle that has been garage-kept and serviced regularly, which adds to its appeal. The truck also comes equipped with modern features like Bluetooth and a battery maintainer.
Neutral: @DrFreshAir inquires whether the truck is 4WD, and @vate333 clarifies that it is a 2WD model. @Bidochka asks about the originality of the truck's panels and any possible paintwork. Others, like @TurboHorizon, share their experiences with similar trucks, while @Nermpoop suggests that the truck could be driven anywhere, including the East Coast. @Stumpdragon asks about shipping assistance, indicating potential buyer interest in logistics, while @91crxtacy expresses regret over the decline of small pickup trucks in the market.
Negative: There were no distinctly negative comments about the vehicle; however, @Frankg33 raised a question about the air conditioner's performance, hinting at possible concerns, but it was promptly confirmed by @JBS1961 that the air conditioner blows cold. Although no direct criticisms were voiced, the inquiries about original panels and potential paintwork by @Bidochka could suggest a cautious interest among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @BloodyHell believes the ‘57 Bel Air coupe is one of the coolest looking American cars, highlighting its aesthetic appeal alongside other classic vehicles like the ’68 GT390 FB Mustang and ’70 Z28. @Boyd1967 recalls his own experience with a 327 Muncie 4-speed version, calling the current one cool with an awesome motor and great details. @boaboyoz praises the car as a beautiful build, mentioning its award at the Columbiana, Alabama Liberty Day Car Show, and @Highlander63 notes the attractive Canary Yellow color of the car, stating it looks particularly good on this model.
Neutral: The seller, @bhambroker, provides a thorough description of the vehicle's features and its history, noting it has been driven less than 1,000 miles since being purchased from a classic car dealer in Kentucky. Comments around the air conditioning feature and confusion regarding the rear axle type indicate some discrepancies that were clarified by the seller. @mike_rockwell and @Jimmy_P contribute their perspectives on the modifications made to the vehicle, with @mike_rockwell questioning the alterations and @Jimmy_P defending the builder's choices.
Negative: Despite the positive sentiments, there are some critical comments regarding the vehicle's modifications. @Slam105 expresses disappointment about the hood treatment, suggesting the owner could have preserved its appeal, while @CarFoolLane mocks the air conditioning description and hints at issues with the digital dash. @mike_rockwell also questions the decision to cut the hood, emphasizing that such a car could have retained its original appearance. Overall, these negative remarks reflect a divide among classic car enthusiasts about modifications versus preserving original aesthetics.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Camaro's aesthetics and performance. @JohnnyLoophole called it a 'beautiful car' that looks brand new, while @waypoint66 referred to it as a 'sweet Camaro.' @CZ_cars praised the driving video, highlighting the 'rock crusher whine' of the engine, and @MartyKC remarked that it is a 'great car' he would be watching closely, despite having a minor complaint about the opening photo. Furthermore, @Tripletip shared a positive experience dealing with the seller, noting trust in their listings, which further attests to the positive reception of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments raised questions regarding the vehicle's authenticity and details related to its modifications. @Dangarvin58 inquired about the stripe spacing, noting that they seem misaligned and commenting on the overall beauty of the car. @funkaholik explained some variances in stripe application, indicating that not all stripes come from the factory. Commenters also engaged in discussions about the car's representation as a Z28, with @Caymanorcarrera alluding to the vehicle as either a replica or misbadged. Additionally, @Bernard (The Seller) provided a detailed breakdown of the car's history, including its upgrades and previous ownership, inviting clarification questions.
Negative: Conversely, some commenters pointed out concerns about the vehicle. @Pacheco167 humorously challenged the car's authenticity as a Z28. @Mr_Berater raised a query about potential blemishes shown in the photos, specifically asking if one was a paint chip. @ImJustSayin critiqued the RS aspects, asserting that the car does not appear to have been a true RS factory model due to missing components. @ssterry pointed out that the transmission code did not correspond to the seller's M22 claims, suggesting oversight in details. Additionally, @Dangarvin58 highlighted potential wiring issues and other visual irregularities that raised concerns about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Lotusseven shares a positive perspective on the 2006 S-Type 'R', highlighting its quick, competent, and virtually silent performance. The aesthetic appeal of the vehicle in a rare color, along with its comfort, earns it high praise. They note that it provides exceptional value, being a modern sleeper at an affordable price point. Additionally, @stable_3, the seller, emphasizes the vehicle's good condition with only ~78k miles and mentions the careful disclosures about its imperfections. The seller has also conducted necessary servicing, such as new front rotors and an oil change, to ensure the vehicle is ready for its new owner.
Neutral: @Next-N-Line inquires about the quick turnaround on the sale, showing curiosity about the seller's motivation. @SamHershey raises questions about the headliner and the functionality of the mirror cover, demonstrating a practical concern while seeking clarification on minor details. @TurboTbirdKM and @puma2 discuss potential modifications to the vehicle, such as the rear mufflers and supercharger pulley, reflecting their interest in the vehicle's specifics without overtly criticizing it.
Negative: @TurboTbirdKM points out the rear mufflers appear to have been deleted, suggesting possible modifications that could raise concerns about the vehicle's integrity. @puma2 and @TurboTbirdKM express a desire to see the undercarriage of the car to alleviate any concerns about unseen modifications, indicating a level of skepticism about the state of the car. Overall, the comments reflect minor apprehensions regarding changes made to the vehicle and encourage further inspection to ensure everything is as advertised.
|
2011 Ford F-450 Super Duty XLT FX4 Crew Cab Power Stroke Dually 4×4
1FT8W4DT5BEC20687
Lot 203119
Private Party
 |
Positive: @q7suited (The Seller) states that the truck runs and drives fantastic with a range of impressive features installed, including a new OEM motor, turbo, and DPF that have only about 40k miles on them. The truck also boasts a factory backup camera and functioning power folding and extending side mirrors, all of which work perfectly. Additionally, the vehicle has been well-maintained, with a full brake job recently completed, including new pads, rotors, and calipers, emphasizing the quality care it has received.
Neutral: @q7suited (The Seller) clarifies that a clerical error on the Carfax report regarding a previous engine replacement has been corrected, lending more reliability to the truck's history. The truck is located in Carlsbad, CA, and is being offered with a current California smog certificate to ensure it meets local regulations. @bringatrailer supports this by confirming the updates explained by the seller, further validating the vehicle's maintenance records and service history as transparent and accurate.
Negative: There are no negative comments noted regarding the truck's performance or condition. However, @scccarsntrucks inquires about the specifics of the backup camera installation, indicating there may be some interest in further detail or potential concerns from buyers about the original equipment. Overall, comments lean heavily toward promoting the truck's virtues and recent servicing rather than presenting any significant drawbacks.
|
Original-Owner 2001 Mazda MX-5 Miata Special Edition 6-Speed
JM1NB353310213966
Lot 203123
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, highlighting its beautiful dark green and tan color combination, with @aedevito appreciating its aesthetics and @tdboze calling it a stunning example of the Miata. @bugsandbrakedust expressed excitement being a local Cincinnatian to see such a well-maintained vehicle in person. The car's rarity and desirability were acknowledged, with @Ted_Crilly noting that the 2001 BRG Miatas are quite special due to their limited production and favorable condition, making it a valuable collectible.
Neutral: Several neutral inquiries were made about the car's previous auction and its features, including @leiniesbuddy questioning why it was being sold again, with @bernina explaining that the previous buyer was unable to fulfill their commitment. @Zjs requested a larger picture of the window sticker while @Tonygforce inquired about the availability of both sets of keys. @joehammer suggested additional pictures of the undercarriage, reflecting an interest in transparency regarding the car's condition.
Negative: There were a few concerns raised about the vehicle, including @leiniesbuddy's mention of the immobilizer feature which had issues in the past, while @joehammer cautioned about potential rust from the garage environment. @Ted_Crilly pointed out that the claimed rarity of the BRG model was overstated compared to other color variants, suggesting a need for clarity on its market value. Overall, these negative comments reflected caution and scrutiny regarding the car's history and condition.
|
 |
Positive: The 2014 BMW 428i Coupe M Sport with Premium Package and M Sport Package is receiving favorable attention for its impressive features and aesthetic appeal. @aegmotorsports highlighted several standout elements of the vehicle, including the luxurious Black Sapphire Metallic exterior, Sport Seats, and the M Sport Suspension that enhance the driving experience. Commenters have shown interest in the comprehensive list of features, including the advanced audio options with Bluetooth connectivity and dual zone automatic climate control, which add to the overall comfort and enjoyment of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several inquiries have emerged regarding specific features of the BMW 428i Coupe. @ilgiocatore asked about the factory installed oil cooler associated with the M Sport Package, reflecting a desire for clarity on vehicle specifications. @aegmotorsports responded with a breakdown of what the M Sport Package includes and expressed uncertainty about the oil cooler, suggesting that potential buyers are keenly interested in understanding the technical aspects of the car.
Negative: While there are numerous positive comments, there is a concern regarding the visual issues noted in the auction videos. @aegmotorsports clarified that any flickering observed in the instrument cluster or center screen is attributed to the camera's frequency and not indicative of actual problems with the vehicle's displays. However, such issues might lead some potential bidders to question the overall condition and reliability of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Kidsixpack expresses their admiration for the vehicle's build, while @tscoll01 appreciates its aggressive look, specifically highlighting the white color with strobe stripes. @MikeDTaz adds that the older style "resto-mod" aspect makes it ready for a combined restoration project, calling it a potential "bitchin' a$ ride." Additionally, @Wiggleattack believes the car is suitable for hot rodding, asserting that it allows for driving without the worry of damaging a perfect show car, thus appealing to enthusiasts looking for a more authentic experience.
Neutral: @racer355 (The Seller) provides useful information regarding the auction, encouraging potential buyers to seek pre-purchase inspections and emphasizing the importance of asking questions. They clarify that they bought the car without documentation on the repairs, which raises questions among bidders, including @70Cudalife who asks about rust and necessary repairs. @ndcclassics queries about the functionality of features like the overhead console, to which the seller acknowledges the light is operational but notes that the forward warning lights are not working.
Negative: Multiple commenters raise concerns about the car's condition, with @BradleyReed88 advising potential buyers to avoid it and @markl350 highlighting concerns over rust issues that might emerge upon further inspection. @70Cudalife, having extensive experience with similar models, warns that the car's condition should categorize it as a "Project Car" due to its apparent history of rust and wear. @Racecars echoes this sentiment, expressing surprise that a respected dealer would handle such a vehicle without proper disclaimers, while others like @KiwiCuda and @gwn also caution buyers about the visible rust and the need to be wary before making a bid.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered significant praise for its originality and solid condition. Commentators like @ypss36 highlighted the clear and detailed undercarriage photos, appreciating it as a sweet survivor. @920auto (The Seller) received acknowledgement for the pleasant presentation, with @68mustangconvertible complimenting the car and thanking for the videos, which contributed to a favorable impression of the vehicle's quality.
Neutral: Many comments focused on specific details such as the unconventional "rally-style" wheels, with @artpirate333 expressing curiosity about their origin. @broodie and @Dudflier discussed export braces, clarifying that this car does not have one, while @1966Girl noted that they enhance driving stability. Several users shared their intentions of purchasing the car, with @AmerrickaRobinson expression of hope despite budget constraints and @JSK1 suggesting a return to stock wheels for authenticity.
Negative: There were concerns raised about the vehicle's features, particularly relating to the wipers and export braces. @undatakr questioned the absence of wipers and implied possible hidden issues, though @920auto (The Seller) reassured that the wipers were not installed at the time of the photos. @JSK1 expressed a preference for stock steel wheels, hinting that the existing ones might not fit the car's vintage aesthetic. Additionally, @ArchieMI questioned the title situation, adding to the uncertainty surrounding the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @mick59 notes that the vehicle is in nice shape, highlighting that it is one of the last non-Super Beetle convertibles. @dagmar82 shares a fond memory of owning two 1970s and appreciates the wood grain on the dash while expressing interest in the autostick feature mentioned by @Knuckle47. @majcoop60 (The Seller) assures that the top is in very good condition with no rips or tears, and provides detailed videos showing both the car's undercarriage and a street driving segment, demonstrating confidence in the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Several commenters seek additional details about the car's condition. @TomPayne asks for a photo of the wiring, while @VWTony expresses concern over a specific area in picture 37, urging for more visuals to assess structural integrity. @gpmnd poses questions regarding the car's color variations and the VIN discrepancies, prompting @majcoop60 (The Seller) to clarify past repairs and accessory installations, including the underbody sealant that was recently applied.
Negative: Concerns arise from multiple commenters about the vehicle's condition and features. @VWTony points out disturbing imagery in photo 37, suggesting that structural issues could be a problem. @gpmnd also raises issues about an apparent oil leak and inquires about the use of mismatched paint on the door sills. @Fertabarez's inquiry regarding the absence of a spare tire receives a previous negative response from @majcoop60 (The Seller), further underscoring the apprehension surrounding the vehicle's preparedness for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm for the Hyundai Equus, noting its unique features and desirable qualities. @OldBoldBiker commended the seller for highlighting the car's amazing attributes, which suggests that the vehicle is appealing and well-presented. Additionally, @zjtax shared a fond memory of owning an Equus, indicating a sense of love and nostalgia associated with the car. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, also emphasized the standout inventory of their dealership and their commitment to smooth and transparent transactions, contributing to a positive perception of both the vehicle and the seller.
Neutral: The discussion included inquiries from @sy1616 regarding specific functionalities of the vehicle, such as the rear seat operations and potential prior issues like key malfunctions and smoking history. @Collectibleclassics addressed these questions positively, confirming the rectification of the key issue and reassurances about the absence of smoking in the vehicle. There was also a request to showcase the operation of the rear seat features, which the seller promised to provide, indicating a focus on transparency and customer satisfaction.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by @sy1616 regarding the completeness of the vehicle's showcased functionalities, particularly regarding the rear seat recline and massage functions. There seemed to be frustration over missed confirmations in video demonstrations, as @sy1616 noted the absence of specific details that were perceived as important. Overall, while the vehicle received positive remarks, there were clear expectations from potential buyers for thorough documentation and demonstration of its complete features.
|
15k-Mile 1995 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am SLP Comp T/A 6-Speed
2G2FV22P8S2254207
Lot 203132
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Craven appreciates the cleaner design of the vehicle compared to the later models with more complex features. @Dvredc5 finds the car to be very sharp and highlights its rarity, noting that they have never seen one on the road during its production. @Domenichello recalls being impressed by the car's performance when he first learned about it, stating that the 300 horsepower rating was remarkable for the time and that the car has aged well visually. @Lt1_Ls1_LSA_Lt4 expresses admiration for the comp T/A, noting its beauty and desirability as a limited production model.
Neutral: @WPhillips raises a practical concern about the front license plate holder and its potential impact on the car's value, inviting opinions from others. @Kaz791 inquires about the original wheels and tires, suggesting a keen interest in the car's complete set of options as indicated in the original window sticker. Several commentors discuss the historical context of the Comp T/A's horsepower relative to other vehicles of that era, clarifying specifications and production details that illustrate the car's standing among its contemporaries.
Negative: @rayfinkle05 asks about the car's condition regarding any smells or history of being smoked in, indicating some concern about the vehicle’s cleanliness and reliability. @RacingJunkie's question about the torque rating leads to a corrections discussion, with @Fhawk clarifying misinformation about torque figures and performance specs. Overall, there is some skepticism about the accuracy of the car's published specifications and history, reflecting concerns over the seller's claims.
|
 |
Positive: @ExclusiveMotorClub expresses excitement about the auction of the Mercedes-Benz E450 Cabriolet, highlighting its stunning appearance and the fact that it is a pre-owned certified vehicle. With the 70,000-mile service prepaid, @ExclusiveMotorClub assures potential buyers of extra peace of mind. Additionally, @Redscout praises the car as absolutely wonderful, describing it as beautiful with a good engine, indicating strong positive sentiment towards the vehicle's aesthetics and performance.
Neutral: @kybmwfan engages with @ExclusiveMotorClub to clarify the details of the included service, specifically asking if the next service involves an oil change. @ExclusiveMotorClub responds by sharing information about the prepaid service contract and confirming that routine maintenance will be covered at the time of service, providing practical details that potential buyers may need to know without expressing strong opinions.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: @nrh3k described the truck as beautiful and expressed appreciation for its simplicity, noting his fondness for the original appearance of the Land Rover without unnecessary additions. The overall presentation of the vehicle and its aesthetic has received praise from several commentors, highlighting its appeal among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several participants, including @jbrunellovintage and @sunvalley, requested specific information and images related to the vehicle's conditions, such as pictures of the floor and details about the rear cross member. @FDpsp2018 (The Seller) provided insights about the restoration process, mentioning that the painting was completed between 2020-2022 and that a car inspector verified the quality of the work, which relieved some concerns from potential buyers.
Negative: @dmavis raised concerns regarding the potential for frame damage, specifically inquiring about re-welds and patches that are common in vehicles of this type. @WAGONBOYTD noted the absence of air conditioning, emphasizing it as a typical characteristic of the model which may deter some bidders. @ethanberk and others shared their desire for further details about leaks and the integrity of the chassis, indicating uncertainties surrounding the vehicle's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle are overwhelmingly positive, celebrating its stunning design and impressive build quality. @nexusautobrokers calls it 'Big boss in the house!', and @trizzuth describes it as 'Stunning!'. @Belacyrf refers to it as a 'Dream car' and @gwfisher33 expresses amazement by saying, 'This car is AMAZING!' Other commenters, like @SlowNRusty, praise the engine as a 'beast' and note that it could make many air-cooled 911 owners blush. Additionally, @fabulous71 calls it an 'Amazing example' and 'Great build from one of the best in the industry,' generating awareness of the brand's meticulous craftsmanship.
Neutral: A few comments provide useful technical insights without expressing clear enthusiasm or disappointment. @Celsius mentions the original axles being surprising for such a build and suggests an upgrade, while @JDML_Eric clarifies that the factory axles and LSD have been performing well, noting recommended upgrades for future owners. @Craven reminisces about the vehicle's potential as an import and how it would have favored domestic preferences due to steering wheel placement. @leo23k inquires about the fuel cell and harness expiration dates, indicating a practical concern without negative sentiment.
Negative: Negative sentiments are comparatively muted, primarily centering around practical concerns. @leo23k raises an issue regarding the fuel cell's age, suggesting it should have been replaced due to safety regulations. Similarly, @racedeck counters this by emphasizing the low mileage and careful usage of high-octane fuel, indicating that there haven't been pressing needs for replacements. Comments like these hint at some apprehension regarding the vehicle's upkeep, though the concerns are generally mitigated by positive remarks about the car's overall condition and appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @mediumformatphoto appreciates the vehicle's aesthetic, noting its appearance in Anthracite and the attractive red stitching on the seats, implying it adds to the luxury feel of the car. @VegasJeff praises the traditional heated seats for their warmth and comfort while highlighting the car as an 'under-appreciated model' that deserves more attention. Multiple comments recognize the elegance and desirability of the vehicle, particularly @24601 who calls it 'a sexy looking beast' and @p1_motorcars_ltd expressing a personal affinity for the XJR 100, praising its unique styling and performance features.
Neutral: @p1_motorcars_ltd (The Seller) addresses concerns regarding the vehicle's stolen history, clarifying that no claims were made against it and that it was a mistake in records when exported to Canada. They also provide details about the car's ownership history, maintenance, and operational status, assuring potential buyers of its good condition and recent servicing. The seller actively engages with inquiries, providing information about the tires, air-conditioning, suspension system, and service history to prospective buyers like @gmcculla who seek more clarity.
Negative: @Kens1963 raises a question about the car's damage when stolen, highlighting an issue that could concern potential buyers about its past. @etip comments critically on the budget tires currently on the vehicle, implying they may not perform well in adverse weather conditions, which raises safety concerns. @markinthelight inquires about potential error codes, suggesting a level of wariness regarding the car's reliability, while @gmcculla asks about the paint flaws and their potential remedies, reflecting skepticism about the car’s cosmetic state and condition.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the seller's engagement and the vehicle's unique qualities. @ron67, the seller, demonstrates excitement about the auction and provides helpful information regarding the vehicle's history, including its low mileage and the family-oriented use since 2013. The seller reassures potential buyers by offering to answer questions directly and mentioning that the vehicle has passed CA smog tests, further increasing buyers' confidence in the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Several commenters seek clarifications regarding the vehicle. @JBMO requests clearer images of the window sticker, while @saab81 inquires about the vehicle's previous usage. @zzoper expresses concern about possible oil leaks, and @longdriver7267 shares insights about potential engine issues related to long periods of inactivity based on Carfax details. The seller addresses these questions systematically, providing relevant information such as details about the AC condensation and key availability, maintaining an informative tone.
Negative: There are some concerns raised regarding the vehicle's condition. @longdriver7267 mentions potential issues with engine oil consumption due to the vehicle sitting for extended periods, while @Maddog7580 questions if there have been any repaint repairs or rust. The seller acknowledges the discoloration of the frame, attributing it to the lack of undercoating in California, but reassures that there are no significant rust issues. However, the queries reflect some level of apprehension from buyers about the vehicle's overall integrity.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, praising its unique build and aesthetic appeal. @boaboyoz called it 'cool AF', while @rickaz appreciated how it reinterpreted the classic Ford pickup design. @Greybeard2 highlighted the truck's ability to surprise viewers with its sophisticated features contrasted against its vintage appearance, describing it as truly impressive. Others, such as @HillTopRodShop, reiterated their approval of the 2.47 gear ratio, showing a strong positive sentiment towards the truck's specs. Overall, the truck was often noted for its outstanding craftsmanship and reliability.
Neutral: Several comments focused on design specifics and technical details of the truck. @Fasting inquired about heating capabilities for colder climates, while @FEFrancoD asked for clarification on the gear ratio in the rear. The seller, @casciomotors, provided detailed responses about the air conditioning system, stating it was a vintage setup that works well, and addressing questions regarding the fuel tank's location and the truck's rear end specifications. This exchange highlighted a mix of curiosity and interest in the vehicle's practical aspects, balancing emotion with technical inquiry.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by commenters regarding operational aspects of the truck. @G.M.-TECH pointed out that the air ride control panel's flashing could indicate potential issues, prompting the seller to clarify that the visual effect was due to camera compatibility rather than a malfunctional component. @ronchappell noted noticeable rattling sounds when filming the truck, suggesting that it might require further attention, though @casciomotors responded to assure that such noises were normal considering the air compressor activity. These comments reflect a level of skepticism about the vehicle's condition despite the positive feedback from many others.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed that the vehicle is a fantastic opportunity for buyers, with @MPal stating it feels like the "steal of the century" and noting how it provides an exhilarating driving experience. @Zelgzelg (The Seller) echoed this sentiment, highlighting that the vehicle is an absolute blast to drive and superior to other G63 models they've owned. The warranties mentioned by @Zelgzelg also added reassurance that the vehicle is well taken care of, which boosted confidence among potential buyers.
Neutral: Some comments focused on clarifying details about the vehicle's features and warranty status. @badali inquired about the absence of Distronic adaptive cruise control and prompted an update to the listing, which @bringatrailer confirmed was done. Additionally, @Fmp1971 asked about the existing warranty and the possibility of an optional extended warranty, reflecting a typical concern among buyers looking for assurance on their investment.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's branded title and history. @richpal highlighted worries about the rear axle replacement and its implications, while @MPal and @WAGroup debated the specifics of which units received branded titles, indicating potential confusion among buyers. @badali suggested that the listing should clearly state the absence of certain features, implying that the seller should be transparent about the vehicle's specifications and history to alleviate buyer hesitation.
|
 |
Positive: @ML84, the seller, expressed great fondness for the vehicle, referring to it as their 'baby' and a fantastic family truckster. They have taken exceptional care of the car, maintaining its pristine condition and ensuring all necessary services were performed at BMW of San Francisco. The seller is proud of the vehicle's upgrades, particularly appreciating the 21-inch wheels for their compatibility with local road conditions, indicating a thoughtful choice rather than purely aesthetic. Additionally, the seller has been proactive in managing the vehicle’s upkeep, evidenced by the recent service invoice and video showing the car’s condition.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged with @ML84 to ask questions and share their thoughts about the vehicle. @M_Bimmer inquired about wheel spacers, and the seller clarified that the car is bone stock without any modifications. @VRMoose asked about potential rattling noises after a rear glass replacement, and the seller confirmed that the dealer did an excellent job, eliminating those concerns. @Crozz also reached out to verify if the car was non-smoking, which the seller answered positively. The vehicle has seen some wear from small children but has been well-protected with a strict no-food or drink policy, making the overall condition largely positive with only minor incidents reported.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, there are minimal concerns raised, primarily related to small wear and tear from family use. @Lexusguy67 questioned any 'mishaps' from kids or pets, to which @ML84 acknowledged a couple of minor incidents, including a torn cover from the LATCH anchors and small indentations on the third-row seats. Though the seller maintains that the upholstery is largely unscathed, these minor issues may be a point of concern for potential buyers. Additionally, though there is praise for the SUV's performance, @HAPPY noted a dislike for the shift buttons, indicating a specific component that may not appeal to everyone.
|
 |
Positive: @Espanolie praised the vehicle as a great looking example of the 100 series, highlighting its amazing condition for being 27 years old and having just one owner. @hsingh7 emphasized that the Land Cruiser is in truly remarkable shape and has been well cared for, reassuring potential buyers through a detailed description of the recent services performed, including a timing belt replacement and new tires. @sws77 appreciated that the gold accents were factory options, indicating the vehicle's authenticity, while also expressing excitement about available upgrades like a new stereo system with Apple CarPlay and backup camera.
Neutral: @Pedges56 asked about the condition of the bumper covers and any visible damage like scrapes or dings. @hsingh7 responded by confirming a minor scratch on the driver front fender that had been touched up, suggesting that the bumps are mainly cosmetic and not very noticeable. Additionally, @MeatyOccre inquired about shipping options, and @hsingh7 provided a quote for an open trailer, while @sws77 clarified the typical shipping costs for different trailer types, contributing to a practical discussion about logistics.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @sws77 regarding the functionality of the "D" light indicator, which could suggest a minor electrical issue, although it was also noted it might be a simple bulb replacement. Furthermore, @sws77 probed into the condition of the undercarriage for rust issues, which @hsingh7 reassured had no presence. The interactions indicate that potential buyers were cautious about the vehicle's mechanical details, but there were no significant negative comments that undermined the overall appeal.
|
 |
Positive: The M6 convertible has received high praise for its aesthetics and performance. @Letitride789 noted the beautiful color and elegant stance of the car, stating it is low yet still elegant. Meanwhile, @sdrcp complimented the vehicle as the best sounding V10 ever made, underscoring its attractiveness as a performance car. The seller, @TEB, also emphasized the significant care taken in detailing the vehicle, making it ready for its next owner, which contributes positively to its appeal.
Neutral: @TEB mentioned that the car is mechanically sound and has been checked thoroughly, although the rod bearings have not been done. The seller is transparent about the car's past, including the fact that the warning light on the dashboard is intermittent, and that the reason for selling is due to upgrading to a newer version of the M6. In response to the interest in the car's suspension, @TEB assured that the ride with the BC coilovers is smooth and that all original components are available.
Negative: There has been some concern regarding the warning light mentioned by @TEB, as it appears intermittently and cannot be cleared, which might raise questions among potential buyers. Additionally, @mrcanoehead's comment regarding the non-constructiveness suggests that not all feedback regarding the M6 has been positive or relevant, indicating a mixed reception in terms of buyer questions and concerns.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters like @1lotus1 expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, referencing its capability to handle fun tasks such as transporting a claw machine. The seller, @AJL1988, highlights the truck's impressive specifications, which include a powerful MaxxForce 7 6.4L Turbodiesel V8 engine and various features like a durable steel body and advanced electrical systems. The vehicle's clean service history and excellent overall condition, as confirmed by a professional inspection, were also noted as positive aspects, along with its relatively low mileage of just 37,692 miles.
Neutral: The comments included inquiries about the truck's features and specifications, with users like @Justadude asking for specific measurements of the pickup bed and payload capacity. The seller promptly provided details, showcasing the truck's capabilities. Other neutral comments included questions about the necessary class of license for operation; @AJL1988 clarified that no CDL is required, given the truck's GVWR of 17,280 lbs, which provides important operational information to potential bidders.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the MaxxForce 7 engine, a topic discussed by @LongDucDong, who pointed out that while the truck is cool, the engine has mixed reviews. @AJL1988 defended the engine, emphasizing its strengths while acknowledging its history with emissions regulations. Additionally, there were questions about the truck's MSRP, revealing that while it was a significant investment at the time, it aligns with high-end diesel trucks today, which might deter budget-conscious buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its appearance and unique features. @Blizzard340 remarked on the good looks of the Land Cruiser while suggesting it should be enjoyed rather than left as a showpiece. @kayak shared a nostalgic connection with similar vehicles, reminiscing about learning to drive in a Ford pickup and praising the truck's presence in the automotive heritage context.
Further, @Brugman7 mentioned the vehicle's setup, indicating it has the classic 'three on the tree' configuration and provided discussions about customizability options like aftermarket bench seats in the rear, which excited potential buyers looking at the truck for its vintage appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters posed direct questions about the vehicle's condition and specifics. @Chamba inquired about the spare rack, while @100LL asked for clarification regarding the rear seating and cargo area. @ducttape also raised concerns about the vehicle's long registration period and cobwebs underneath, to which @Brugman7, the seller, assured that it had been kept well in a garage and lightly used, implying that the old registration was not a significant issue.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the truck's usability. @ducttape noted the old registration and cobwebs, and other users questioned whether the vehicle ran properly, to which @Brugman7 confirmed it does. However, some commenters hinted at a lack of maintenance or inactivity, suggesting that potential buyers might want reassurance about the vehicle's performance and history despite the seller's assurances.
|
 |
Positive: @wolfekerr expresses their appreciation for the vehicle, stating they enjoy their E90 and find it beautiful. @Collectibleclassics, the seller, emphasizes the quality of the auction experience, mentioning their commitment to sourcing unique vehicles and providing transparent transactions. They proudly highlight their excellent customer reviews and invite potential buyers to visit their location in Douglassville, PA for inspections or inquiries.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics provides information about the vehicle's service history, including extensive maintenance and service records from the original owner. They address common concerns about the timing chain by explaining that it typically does not require replacement within 200,000 miles and assures bidders that the vehicle is in good condition. They also clarify details regarding the tires, responding to inquiries about the installation dates and markings on the paint.
Negative: @Paul_Dietzel raises concerns about the auction's lack of bids and questions the timing chain status, suggesting that potential issues might be deterring bidders. @OR1217 points out additional markings on the car's paint that were not mentioned in the videos, indicating possible quality concerns. @Paul_Dietzel further questions the discrepancy regarding tire codes, implying that there may be inconsistencies in the vehicle's documentation.
|
2004 Ford F-250 Super Duty XLT Crew Cab Power Stroke 4×4 FX4
1FTNW21P44EB30416
Lot 203149
Private Party
 |
Positive: The seller, @Chapter2, has provided reassurance regarding the vehicle's compliance with smog regulations. They confirmed that by reinstalling the catalytic converter, the truck would successfully pass smog checks in California and likely in New York as well, due to similar emissions policies. Additionally, they emphasized that the truck is equipped with CARB legal aftermarket parts, which do not emit excessive smoke, making it suitable for visual inspections.
Neutral: Several individuals have inquired about modifications and restoration options. @Gballer82 asked about the catalytic converter, while @BrotherLOU expressed concerns regarding the cost and feasibility of restoring the truck to factory height. @Chapter2 addressed these questions directly, providing information on modifications and offering recommendations for potential restoration parts without undermining the value of the vehicle.
Negative: No significant negative comments about the vehicle were noted in the conversation. While concerns were raised about modifications and potential costs, @Chapter2 responded thoughtfully, suggesting that all inquiries were reasonable and showing a willingness to assist potential buyers. Overall, there were no outright criticisms of the truck's condition or performance.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters highlighted the car's aesthetic appeal and performance capabilities. @jays964 remarked on the enjoyable driving experience with the LT-1 engine, emphasizing its great sound and torque, in contrast to the more recognized LS-1 engine. @Domenichello and @JohnDoe351 praised the car's condition and design. The seller, @Redcamero, expressed pride in the vehicle’s beauty, connecting positively with the audience's appreciation for classic cars.
Neutral: Several comments contained technical observations about the vehicle's specifications and features. @Al_Loco shared insight into the correlation between tire specifications and speedometer readings, confirming that different tires could affect performance metrics. @jays964 also provided specific details regarding tire sizes and their relation to the car's speed ratings, suggesting a thoughtful understanding of the vehicle's engineering. Additionally, @Redcamero noted that the car retains original elements, affirming its authenticity and preserving its historical context.
Negative: Concerns were raised about potential issues with the vehicle, particularly by @JONNIEB who pointed out visible discoloration on the engine and hood padding, questioning the car's overall maintenance. They also inquired about the fit of the top against the windshield frame and requested information about the tires' manufacturing date. These comments indicate apprehension regarding the car's condition, suggesting that there may be unresolved maintenance or aesthetic issues that potential buyers should consider.
|
2023 Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack Widebody Shakedown Special Edition 6-Speed
2C3CDZFJXPH605482
Lot 203121
Private Party
 |
Positive: @EricDredge described the vehicle as beautiful and definitely in good condition, which reflects a positive perception of its overall state. @Caffeinated25 also appreciates the car, noting its awesomeness while expressing a wish that the seller could have enjoyed it more than the limited miles driven. @NickW1 commends the rarity of the Challenger being offered with less than 1k miles in new condition, further affirming the vehicle's appeal to collectors and enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Dirk777 (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the purchase price, clarifying that he did not pay the initial $92K sticker price as stated, but did pay over MSRP when purchasing the car upon its release. He expresses honesty about his anticipation of losing money on the sale but emphasizes his fondness for the vehicle. He provides context about the car's low mileage, indicating that it was intended for short drives, showcasing his intent to maintain its value and condition.
Negative: While the overall comments express admiration for the vehicle, there is an undertone of concern about its resale value, with @Caffeinated25 mentioning they would wait to see where the auction heads considering the investment made. The uncertainty of the auction's outcome also raises questions among potential bidders about the desirability and future appreciation of the vehicle. @MerlinsGarage notes that the golden days of muscle cars have passed, suggesting that while this car is special now, its long-term value might be uncertain.
|
 |
Positive: @dmnmkmcm5 commented positively on the vehicle, appreciating its beauty and suggesting the addition of a driving video, particularly highlighting the exhaust sound. This indicates a favorable view towards the aesthetic and auditory aspects of the vehicle, suggesting that it appeals to potential buyers who are enthusiasts about performance and design.
Neutral: @amotorsports (The Seller) provided reassurance to potential buyers by mentioning a 4-month / 4,000-mile powertrain warranty included with the purchase of the SVR Range Rover. This detail serves to enhance buyer confidence, signifying that the seller is willing to stand behind the vehicle's reliability and performance.
Negative: @MicFly763 raised a concern regarding the maintenance history of the vehicle by asking if the water pump had been replaced. This question suggests potential apprehension about the vehicle's condition and draws attention to the importance of understanding prior maintenance to ensure the car's longevity and reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express a strong admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and specifications. @BarneyFife describes it as possibly the most visually appealing auto, likening it to a thrilling spectacle reminiscent of wealth. Additionally, @lasik1 appreciates the sinister appearance of the car and its high-quality features, indicating that it is well-equipped with desirable options such as Magneride and Hi-Fi sound. @FDSLUXURYAUTO (The Seller) also assures potential buyers of the vehicle's quality by stating it is covered in PPF, further adding to its allure.
Neutral: A few commenters raised questions or shared observations that didn't lean heavily towards praise or criticism. @Fordsarecool suggested that a different color for the wheels could enhance the car's visual appeal, while @GrantAlward inquired about the reason behind the car's low mileage before resale. @lukewhitney requested clarification regarding the car's emissions testing status, and @FDSLUXURYAUTO (The Seller) provided information that the car has not yet been tested for emissions, noting that it has 'title only' status, which seems to satisfy @wlporsches's concern about California requirements.
Negative: On the more critical side, some comments express concerns about the vehicle, particularly regarding its color and potentially low desirability. @Ramblero questioned the choice of color, stating they cannot imagine why someone would select such a shade. Additionally, @clean_machina raised concerns about the low mileage prior to resale, speculating that buyers might fear depreciation and thus prefer not to drive it. These critiques highlight a sense of skepticism about the car's market appeal and practicality.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed strong admiration for the vehicle, highlighting features like its impressive build, including LWB, CCBs, and PDLS+. @Mandinga in particular noted the luxury elements like leather and carbon, suggesting it's a high-value build of approximately $210-220k. Many users, such as @skillman and @swisha, shared positive ownership experiences, with @swisha mentioning it is the best-handling and most engaging car they've ever driven while enjoying the attention that the Lava Orange color brings. The seller, @rsautohaus, also confirmed the car has no signs of being tracked and has been well-maintained with protective features like PPF and ceramic coating.
Neutral: The interactions also included inquiries about the vehicle's history, including if it had been tracked or driven on less than ideal roads. @essrt8 asked about the car's usage, while @jstyer humorously questioned its driving conditions. Commenters sought additional information such as the window sticker, with @ethanlynne and @Mandinga both expressing interest in this documentation. @rsautohaus responded positively to these inquiries, providing a build sheet photo and assuring that the car had no significant issues or recalls associated with its model.
Negative: On the flip side, there were some concerns raised about potential issues with the vehicle. @carman725511 inquired about engine replacement incidents related to this model, prompting @rsautohaus to clarify that the 2016 GT3 RS did not have such issues linked to its engine. Additionally, comments like those from @mussberger discussed common replacement parts like side mufflers, hinting at possible future maintenance needs. Overall, while the comments exhibited excitement and appreciation for the car, there were undercurrents of caution regarding some of its mechanical aspects.
|
 |
Positive: @cole-351 (The Seller) describes the F-250 as very clean and original, emphasizing its well-maintained condition with an odometer reading of around 55k miles, believed to be genuine based on service records. The original paint is praised for its shine despite a minor repaint on the lower rear bedside, and the bed floor's condition is noted to be near-new for a 50-year-old vehicle. @BaerBronco and @T_McCool also share positive sentiments, with @BaerBronco admiring the truck's color, calling it the best yellow from that era, while @T_McCool appreciates the Explorer package and the seat upholstery.
Neutral: @cole-351 (The Seller) gives specific details about the truck's features, noting the small repairs made during ownership, like replacing the original belts and muffler, as well as maintaining the air conditioning unit. The mention of the original build sheet and manuals indicates a level of authenticity and care, which could interest potential buyers. The seller clarifies that the seat is vinyl rather than leather, correcting any misconceptions.
Negative: While there are no outright negative comments from the seller, @cole-351 (The Seller) does acknowledge some issues like the small tears in the rubber mat and cracks in the steering wheel. Additionally, while the air conditioning unit functions, it requires a rebuild, which could be seen as a drawback for prospective buyers. Overall, the only criticisms come in the form of minor imperfections rather than significant flaws.
|
402-Powered 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle Malibu Sport Coupe 4-Speed
136370B158085
Lot 203154
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the aesthetic appeal and craftsmanship of the 1970 Chevelle. @Rhya describes it as a "masterpiece," highlighting its looks and beauty. @Moparmanbet appreciates the 402 big block engine, and @MartyKC notes the car's resurgence in interest, hinting at a community of enthusiasts. Others like @Moparmanbet and @usedmag rave about the color of the car, emphasizing its uniqueness and visual appeal, with @MRD1950 (The Seller) thanking everyone for their interest and noting that the paint is nearly flawless. The interior's condition, as observed by @Al_Loco, speaks to the car's solid build, further enhancing its appeal in the comments.
Neutral: As the discussion continues, various commenters try to analyze the car’s features and authenticity, mostly focusing on whether this Chevelle can be considered a genuine SS model. @SCJScott poses questions about the interior's glove box, suggesting that the indication of a round gauge dash might not be a definitive marker of an SS. @ssterry and @Al_Loco offer insights regarding gauge packages and interior details while @MRD1950 (The Seller) responds with technical information about the vehicle's components and what could establish its classification, demonstrating an ongoing commitment to transparency about the vehicle's specifications. A sense of community collaboration emerges as users share knowledge to help determine the vehicle's authenticity.
Negative: However, not all feedback is positive; some commenters maintain skepticism regarding the vehicle's authenticity as an SS model. @HarleyFXDL argues that without original documentation like a build sheet or matching engine codes, it's tough to definitively classify the car as an SS. @ssterry echoes this sentiment, urging the seller to avoid making claims about the car's status as an SS without proof. Concerns also arise about the modifications and whether they contribute to the illusion of being an SS. @Nsarge and @FullSizeL72 suggest that the perceived value hinges on the car's authenticity, implying that the absence of definitive evidence might hinder the seller's ability to justify a higher asking price. Overall, the comments reflect a mix of admiration for the car's aesthetics and a critical approach to verifying its historical authenticity.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed their admiration for the 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4, highlighting its beauty and unique features. @theforce88 remarked on the car's beauty and wished the seller good luck, while @doorite1 mentioned loving the car immediately after receiving a quick response from the seller. @motorcarmarketusa provided enthusiastic replies and emphasized the car's working systems like Active Aero and four-wheel steering, which @DannyD inquired about, showing the vehicle's impressive functionalities.
Neutral: Questions from potential buyers have focused on the vehicle's maintenance history and operational status. @redawgleader raised concerns about the timing belt change and existing warning lights, whereas @FerrariTifoso asked for information on a reported accident and the availability of keys and books. Additionally, @GeramywithaG inquired about the functioning of the ECS and active exhaust systems, seeking assurance of their operational state.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns over mechanical issues that need addressing. @doorite1 asked about leaks and the functionality of factory items, questioning the A/C system, while @GeramywithaG noted a potential belt squeaking sound that might indicate needed belt replacements. @motorcarmarketusa confirmed that an alternator belt may require tightening and assured buyers that any belt issues would be resolved before sale, but these inquiries highlighted potential maintenance worries that could affect buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received glowing praise from several commentors, highlighting its beauty and design. @five_ms referred to it as a "Beautiful bike," and @slibertore echoed this sentiment. Many enthusiasts expressed admiration for its status as a limited-edition model and its ties to both Kings Mountain and Polaris, with @iya0yas providing detailed historical context about the bike's design and craftsmanship, likening it to the "Bentley of motorcycles." The seller, @garagekeptmotors, also acknowledged the bids and excitement around the bike, indicating its desirability.
Neutral: Various commentators raised questions about the bike's specifications and maintenance history. @Jeff-Lacy inquired about the last service date and fuel system condition, while @Steve7115 asked about potential updates like clutch replacement and electrical system enhancements. The seller addressed concerns regarding service history, confirming that the bike was regularly started during storage and that they would provide requested videos for potential buyers. @39mercman engaged with the seller regarding specific parts of the bike, demonstrating a thoughtful interest in the details of the design.
Negative: Despite overall positive feedback, a few commentors expressed concerns about the bike's condition and history. @Jeff-Lacy's question about whether its fuel system had been gummed up due to long-term storage suggests potential worries about maintenance neglect. @slibertore raised a concern about the appearance of the black paint, suggesting possible issues that could affect the bike's aesthetic appeal. The seller responded, indicating that the concern might be due to lighting, but the inquiry reflects some typical skepticism from potential buyers about cosmetic imperfections.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a lot of enthusiasm from @minidude who calls it a "sweet sleeper muscle truck," while @keith_k appreciates its fantastic stance. Enthusiasts are impressed with the modifications, particularly @mr_smee, who loves the wheels and black grille design. @dcampbell04210 (The Seller) expresses excitement about the driving experience, indicating the truck is an absolute blast and reflects a passion for building vehicles. @mike_rockwell highlights its uniqueness as a two-wheel drive short-bed pickup, suggesting it stands out among factory performance vehicles.
Neutral: There are inquiries about the truck's upgrades and performance, with @imightbid asking for details on where the upgrades were done, while @lsdills inquires about any warranties attached to the vehicle. @dcampbell04210 (The Seller) clarifies that there is no warranty from Ford due to modifications but provides reassurance regarding the warranty on the workmanship by the installation shop. @pirates81 and @marvmt show curiosity about specifics like boost levels and towing capabilities, leading to further dialogue with the seller about the truck's features and limitations.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding potential emissions inspection issues from @dtrujillo12, as they sought clarity on whether the tuned vehicle could pass state requirements. Furthermore, @marvmt noted a misunderstanding about the presence of a trailer hitch, which could impact towing capabilities. Lastly, @johnny1eye and @dcampbell04210 (The Seller) discussed a general dissatisfaction with the direction of some iconic Ford models, suggesting that there is a feeling of disappointment among some enthusiasts regarding modern adaptations of classic vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the Jeep for its condition and performance. @falcolnflyer reminisced about owning a similar model and thanked the seller for sharing their experiences, while @Ratty complimented its reliability, noting their own Cherokee's impressive 300,000 miles with regular maintenance. @colecyccone expressed envy for the person who eventually purchases it, citing the seller's attentiveness and the vehicle’s beauty. @funkisfunky and @AMcM also shared their admiration for the Jeep, with AMcM highlighting its mechanical design features as favorable. Overall, the vehicle is seen as a desirable classic with a strong ownership history.
Neutral: Comments reflected a mix of inquiries and general observations about the Jeep's features and condition. @Skisworld requested additional information about the tires' DOT dates, and @Bevvis sought clarification on potential corrosion, which the seller assured was minimal. @bmwe30m3guy provided a checklist of maintenance concerns, indicating some issues but also showing interest in the vehicle's upkeep. The seller responded to these inquiries by providing detailed explanations of the inspection and repairs completed, indicating they have been proactive in maintaining the vehicle’s condition.
Negative: A few comments highlighted concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @bmwe30m3guy listed critical maintenance issues from a service report, implying a need for attention and repairs, and @Rynohd followed up asking for clarification on the seller's responses, emphasizing the significance of those issues. While the seller assured that all problems were addressed in recent service visits, these comments reveal a level of caution among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and current state.
|
 |
Positive: There are several commendations about the vehicle's condition and features. @SwissMovement notes that the car appears clean and mentions that it's the last model year with the 5.0 V8 engine, which is viewed positively. @Carneed (The Seller) describes the LR4's performance as smooth and solid, echoing the assessments made by other commenters. Additionally, the last service performed on the cooling system is highlighted as thorough and necessary, contributing to a reassuring impression of the vehicle's maintenance history.
Neutral: It's important to point out the informative exchanges about the vehicle's specifications and maintenance history. @pizzle raises valid questions regarding potential issues with the cooling system and the timing chain service, highlighting common concerns for the LR4 model. @jwehman provides details from vindecoderz confirming features like the locking rear differential and available packages, improving the overall understanding of the vehicle's specifications. The responses from @Carneed (The Seller) effectively address these inquiries, showing transparency and responsiveness.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the timing chain service, which @pizzle inquires about, suggesting potential future maintenance issues. Although @Carneed (The Seller) asserts that there are currently no symptoms indicating problems, it raises some apprehension amongst potential buyers. Furthermore, while the cooling system has allegedly been serviced, there remains skepticism about the past issues that these vehicles have faced, leaving room for doubt among some commenters who want reassurance before making a decision.
|
 |
Positive: Comments on the vehicle reflect a strong appreciation for its overall aesthetics and build quality. @PapawMac described it as a 'really great looking car,' and others like @gadget212 praise the beautiful Lapis Blue color, calling it one of the best colors for this model. @revron and @Blizzard340 also highlight the appeal of a low-mileage example, indicating that this Boxster is a desirable find in the market. Additionally, @WIDWMKR, the seller, provided positive insights about the car’s solid condition, emphasizing that it is very presentable for driving and enjoying despite some cosmetic imperfections.
Neutral: The discussion surrounding the vehicle includes inquiries about its maintenance history, particularly regarding the IMS and RMS components. @Segura911 raised the question about these crucial parts being replaced, while @revron pointed out potential issues with yellow paint noted around the left rear wheel arch. @WIDWMKR mentioned that the IMS bearing has likely not been replaced, inviting buyers to consider this when bidding. Organized by interest in potential upcoming road trips, comments from @gadget212 and other users reflect curiosity about maintenance needs before such long journeys, along with proactive advice on replacing tires and other wear items.
Negative: Some concerns have emerged regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly with potential oil leak sources. @Segura911 noted seepage around the oil filter housing, indicating it might be a plastic housing issue that could lead to drips over time. @Subgunner echoed worries about oil pathways in older models that are prone to cracking. @Segura911 expressed a strong inclination towards replacing the oil filter housing to prevent future issues. Additionally, some commenters expressed doubts over the long-term reliability of components due to their original state, including worries about the IMS bearing, which could be an added expense for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has attracted positive interest, with some commenters appreciating its unique size and design. @Dcisfun humorously highlighted the need for a banana for scale, indicating the vehicle's compactness, which could appeal to buyers looking for something manageable. Overall, the vehicle presents itself in a way that invites curiosity and amusement among those who encounter it.
Neutral: There are neutral comments surrounding the vehicle's size and practicality. Many commenters seem to have mixed feelings regarding its dimensions, as @Dcisfun expressed initial confusion regarding its full-size appearance. This suggests that while it may not meet everyone's expectations, it serves a niche purpose that some may find appealing.
Negative: On the negative side, the vehicle's smaller size could deter buyers looking for a traditional full-size tractor experience. The joke made by @Dcisfun about needing a banana for scale indicates that there may be some disappointment or misunderstanding about the vehicle's actual size. Such concerns may translate into reluctance for potential buyers who prefer more conventional options.
|
 |
Positive: The overall response to the Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn has been overwhelmingly positive. @ClassicPromenade notes that this particular model is one of the rarest cars due to the limited production run of just 761 units. The restoration quality is highlighted as top-notch, performed by specialists, with many commenting on the car's beautiful design and elegant interiors, such as @Dollycat3 and @Maroonedd. @HHClark, a long-time Rolls-Royce judge, affirms the vehicle's condition, stating it's among the best examples in North America and complements the luxurious driving experience and manageable size.
Neutral: Several commenters provided insights about the vehicle that were neither overtly positive nor negative. @Bordeaux acknowledged the beauty of the car but raised a point of concern regarding the upholstery's color accuracy and the absence of power steering, which @ClassicPromenade clarified was indeed installed. @OnceUponATime posed questions about the car's condition, noting it seemed more suited for touring rather than concours events, showing a keen interest in its usability and historical context.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, there were discussions that touched on potential concerns regarding the vehicle's engine replacement, with @Maroonedd expressing confusion over what caused such a significant repair. Additionally, @brakeservo and @HariClark addressed doubts about the vehicle's engine number matching and detailing, suggesting that some aspects may be less than pristine. These comments reflect a cautious approach from some bidders, who remain aware of the intricacies of classic car ownership and judging.
|
 |
Positive: @Erven50 praised the vehicle for its gear and exhaust upgrades, considering them perfect enhancements. @greatnorth510 and @RobertP425 both expressed their approval, with @greatnorth510 highlighting how much more enjoyable the car became with the 4:10 gearing. @Rbrey381 shared a positive sentiment, calling it a fabulous car and expressing ambition to own one in the future. @luxuryautomax noted the vehicle as a game-changing model featuring independent rear suspension, further emphasizing its significance in the Mustang lineage.
Neutral: @Mike.lesh inquired about the speedometer calibration, which prompted @Fairlane77 (The Seller) to clarify that it had been corrected using a speed calibrator. They also detailed the car's usage history, stating it was never raced or driven in adverse weather conditions and had all factory-installed emission systems intact. Additionally, they mentioned that while the vehicle was in excellent working condition, the tires were over 15 years old and would need to be replaced soon.
Negative: @RED01SVT raised a concern about whether the horsepower recall had been performed, indicating potential uncertainty about the vehicle's condition. While @Fairlane77 (The Seller) confirmed that all required recalls had been completed, the initial query reflects a cautionary attitude among prospective buyers regarding the vehicle's history and thoroughness of prior ownership.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its pristine condition, with @wem5310 noting that it appears well cared for. Additionally, @Dinan7 reassured potential bidders regarding the Carfax listing confusion, emphasizing that it should not deter interest as production issues seem common for cars of this era. @BenjieInKC, the seller, provided detailed information about the L6's specifications and its history, sharing interesting facts that reflect the car's value and exclusivity, particularly its unique production year of 1987.
Neutral: A number of comments posed questions regarding specific features and conditions of the car, such as the functionality of the air conditioning and the state of the dashboard. @Martinft inquired about the non-functional tachometer, A/C, and cruise control, while @spokayman sought clarification on whether the dashboard was simply covered or fully replaced. @Jonfrancis also asked if the A/C system was upgraded to R134 and about the condition of the shocks, indicating general curiosity about the car's operational state without strong negative implications.
Negative: However, some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's maintenance and condition. @spokayman pointed out that the L6's dashboard was likely replaced due to sun damage, questioning the quality of the replacement. @Jonfrancis also voiced concerns about the air conditioning inquiring why it was non-functional, reflecting worries about potentially costly repairs. Overall, the concerns indicated a need for thorough inspection before purchasing, as certain features were not performing as expected.
|
Original-Owner 1992 Ford Mustang Convertible LX 5.0 Summer Edition 5-Speed
1FACP44E4NF155795
Lot 203166
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its excellent condition and unique features. @Billy162435 described it as a 'time capsule' and @Dangermiller called it 'amazingly clean.' @NVGT350 found it 'very foxy,' while @pvivax praised its beauty, asking for additional videos of the engine. Others, like @carlbjr, celebrated the classic features of the red Fox body, emphasizing its American appeal and rarity, particularly noting the factory EQ stereo. @DKeng pointed out its rare manual transmission as a positive attribute, while @Tom1200 simply loved the car's color combination. The consensus is that this Mustang is a well-maintained classic worthy of attention.
Neutral: Several comments contained requests for additional information and clarifications about the car. @Demoodmai and @pvivax both inquired about the original tires and the status of vehicle maintenance, respectively. @00CobraR noted the eBay-style presentation of the listing but acknowledged the car's potential. @Z282SLO recommended more images and video to enhance the listing, indicating a desire for more insights into the car's condition. The seller, @jimquinlan, responded to these inquiries with detailed information, confirming the originality of the tires and the work done on the vehicle, including oil changes and coolant flushes.
Negative: There were some criticisms regarding the listing's lack of visual content. @Z282SLO pointed out the limited number of pictures and absence of videos as drawbacks. In contrast, @NVGT350 made a light-hearted comment regarding the original owner's infrequent oil changes, indicating some concern about maintenance practices despite the car's current condition. Additionally, there were queries from users like @csfoster01 about the air conditioner's functionality, any paint work, and potential fluid leaks, hinting at some skepticism regarding the car's claimed pristine status. Overall, the comments reflect a mix of genuine enthusiasm tempered with careful scrutiny.
|
 |
Positive: @rrobin4x5 (The Seller) describes the BMW Z4 as a well-maintained vehicle, always used for pleasure in good weather and stored in a garage. It has been driven less than 500 miles per year during his ownership, totaling fewer than 6800 miles annually. The car has a detailed service history with 22 repair tickets, confirming it has been properly maintained, which includes thorough inspections and recent service updates to the oil, transmission, brakes, and other components. The seller emphasizes the aesthetic qualities of the vehicle, appreciating its design and ensuring that it has been kept in excellent condition, enhancing its desirability.
Neutral: @GreatLakesGarage raises a concern about the vehicle's history, specifically referencing a duplicate title and a lien at the time of reporting. The seller, @rrobin4x5, addresses this inquiry directly, confirming that he paid off the lien and received a new title in his name. This back-and-forth indicates transparency on the seller's part, providing potential buyers with reassurances about the vehicle's title status. The seller's acknowledgment of all inquiries reflects a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: While the vehicle has many appealing attributes, @rrobin4x5 acknowledges some minor imperfections due to its age, including a small scrape on the passenger rear bumper and a minor chip in the windshield, both of which have been repaired. Despite these blemishes, the seller maintains that the overall condition of the car is excellent for a 14-year-old vehicle. However, such imperfections might deter some potential buyers who seek a flawless appearance. Overall, there are a few aesthetic issues that, while minor, are worth noting for buyers considering the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the cleanliness and unique features of the 2017 VW Beetle Classic. @mark01 praised it as a super clean example, highlighting the interior, while @joeveto noted the car's great utility, encouraging others to drive it. @Carneed (The Seller) agreed with the positive sentiments, showcasing its interior as a standout feature that pays homage to the Beetle’s heritage. @ShineOn shared their experience with the Beetle as a practical vehicle for long trips, emphasizing its comfort and performance, which they found superior to the convertible versions.
Neutral: @Carneed (The Seller) provided information about the vehicle, confirming its meticulous condition and inviting potential buyers to engage with the car through various means, including personal inspections and shipping arrangements. Additionally, when asked about the 'Classic' title, @Carneed explained that this designation honors the original Beetle's design elements while incorporating modern updates. There was also an inquiry from @tkehoe regarding the resolution of recalls and documentation, reflecting a typical concern for potential buyers.
Negative: While generally positive, there were some questions and criticisms. @Longplayer-road made a light-hearted remark questioning whether the Beetle has ever hit a bug, implying curiosity about its utility. @flyingdago expressed skepticism about calling the 2017 model 'Classic,' referencing their own 1958 model as the true classic, which suggests a divide among car enthusiasts regarding the usage of the term. Additionally, @tkehoe raised concerns about the vehicle's recall status, showing that some potential buyers are cautious and seeking clarification on maintenance status.
|
|
|
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning appearance and unique features. @UKDM noted that the NA2 style 17/18s wheels enhance the pre-facelift model's look, while @nexusautobrokers described the car as a "Beauty!!!!!!" @Nonya and @Oldhockyplayr both voiced their affection for the NSX, with the latter recalling fond memories of their own. Overall, the car is described as extremely well cared for and a top-tier offering from @silverarrowcarsltd, which was well-received by enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the history and specifications of the vehicle, with @neuronbob providing detailed data on the NSX, including its rarity as just one of 148 Kaiser Silver models in the US. @FLBuckeye shared a personal anecdote about nearly purchasing the car in the past and his eventual decision to go with a 2024 Cayman GTS. The seller, @silverarrowcarsltd, addressed several inquiries regarding the car's service records, stating that they would upload videos to demonstrate the vehicle's functionality and has confirmed that original parts are included in the sale.
Negative: Some comments contained skepticism about the car's standing and the reliability of the seller. @gm1777 asked specifically about any modifications to the suspension and the inclusion of original parts, though this concern was answered by the seller. @ELW_Z8 raised questions about service records and whether the car had been sitting for three years, reflecting a common apprehension among potential buyers regarding the history and current condition of the vehicle. Overall, while there was a significant amount of positive feedback, some potential buyers felt necessary due diligence was needed before making a bid.
|
 |
Positive: Comments praising the vehicle highlight its extensive maintenance history and overall care. @Dean_Laumbach expresses that the bike was owned by a former BMW repair shop owner who continually serviced it, ensuring it received regular attention and high-quality products like Liqui-Moly oils. Other enthusiasts, such as @airheadearl and @MrMCar, agree on the bike's quality, noting that these models are recognized for their reliability and performance. The modifications made to enhance visibility and comfort, like the new HID headlamp and adjustable windscreen, are also appreciated as beneficial upgrades that enhance safety and riding experience.
Neutral: Several comments provide useful clarifications regarding specific features and maintenance details of the BMW R1150RT. @willy and @bmwboxer discuss the presence of ABS brakes and inquire about tire condition. @Dean_Laumbach mentions that the second owner performed significant maintenance and that the bike includes various accessories and tools for future service. @bbrads raises concerns about the brake hoses, suggesting an upgrade to stainless steel for safety, while also sharing information about common issues with models in this range, providing a realistic view of the bike's history and ongoing upkeep requirements.
Negative: Negative comments focus on potential issues and clarification requests regarding the vehicle's condition. @bbrads highlights the need to replace brake hoses, hinting at possible wear due to the bike's age, while the @willy comments questioning the purpose of certain modifications suggest confusion regarding the bike's performance aspects. This raises concerns for potential buyers, particularly about the higher maintenance needs of a bike with considerable mileage like this one. The discussion around the tire date codes suggests that age-appropriate checks could be a concern for the vehicle, emphasizing caution for prospective purchasers.
|
 |
Positive: Comments reflect a high level of admiration for the vehicle, often praising its aesthetic appeal and particular features. @phnx428 compliments the car's appearance and highlights the impressive photography showcasing it. @AlPalmer10 mentions that the red interior is a valuable feature, asserting it contributes significantly to the car's allure. Enthusiasts like @7257scottt and @Antonello express their excitement about the 1996 Grand Sport model, with several comments underscoring the beauty of its interior colors and rarity within the C4 generation. The overall sentiment suggests that viewers feel the car is a remarkable example that possesses significant collector value.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on specific features and conditions of the vehicle. Questions were raised about possible paintwork, tire codes, and various modifications, particularly in relation to the fender flares and exhaust system. @F1Guy and @Jake_Angel provide observations regarding the car's current status, including potential cosmetic issues and mechanical functioning, while @Chrisrhom (The Seller) responded to inquiries by clarifying the modifications and providing documentation. While these comments do not express overt criticism or praise, they reflect a community focused on ensuring the accuracy of the vehicle's description.
Negative: Some concerns have been voiced about potential discrepancies and paint issues. @F1Guy raises questions regarding blue paint overspray and its implications for the vehicle's authenticity. Some commenters speculated whether those marks indicated previous paintwork or modifications, leading to cautious feelings about the vehicle's overall condition. @Brian10182 also highlights the visual issues but grounds his observations in a broader understanding of these vehicles' manufacturing processes. Such skepticism indicates that while the car is admired, the potential hidden issues have sparked dialogues about transparency and trust in the listing.
|
 |
Positive: The overall feedback highlights the Lexus GX 460's robust engineering and high-quality build, appreciated by owners and potential buyers alike. @reallybmw emphasizes the low mileage, thorough maintenance, and excellent condition of the vehicle, making it a standout example of this model. Furthermore, @wolfekerr shares a personal anecdote about the same model performing reliably at a high mileage, contributing to the vehicle's reputation for durability and comfort.
Neutral: Some comments raise questions about the auction details, such as whether there is a reserve and the number of keys or fobs included. @Pjku79 inquires about the Kinetic Dynamic Suspension System maintenance, while @bobbeaver5551 simply wants clarification about auction terms. The seller's responses suggest transparency and a willingness to provide additional information to potential bidders.
Negative: Criticism arises regarding the vehicle's cosmetic issues and discrepancies, like mismatched tires and a stain on the seat. @Mister_Thundercleeze points out these flaws, suggesting a lack of thoroughness in the vehicle's presentation. @reallybmw acknowledges these concerns and promises corrections before the sale ends, showing accountability but also revealing potential shortcomings in the auction process.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the overall appeal of the vehicle, with enthusiasts expressing excitement about its potential and past modifications. @TurboR1391 describes it as a nice project for buyers looking to source original parts, while @ComptechGSR shares a nostalgic experience with a similar setup, emphasizing that the vehicle is enjoyable to drive. Enthusiasts like @Cmdr430 appreciate the period-appropriate modifications, noting that the car could deliver impressive performance with the right updates.
Neutral: A few comments focus on technical details and condition inquiries. @Tahitiboats351 (The Seller) provides clarity about the intake being an OEM valve cover and discusses the engine management system, elaborating that it is running on a stock ECU from the early 2000s. There is also a mention by @Robert.C regarding a wood block used for jacking, and inquiries about the air-fuel gauge's functionality and the car's air conditioning, which not all models are equipped with.
Negative: Several commenters raise concerns about the vehicle's modifications impacting its smog legality in California. @Vtec4ever expresses worry about finding parts needed to restore the vehicle to a smog-compliant state, particularly the intake. Other concerns include the front lip being a replica and issues with the side markers, noted by @Mo0se, who also highlights the improper placement of an Integra Type R sticker. Overall, some comments suggest that while the car is appealing, restoring it to factory specifications may present challenges.
|
 |
Positive: The comments from @Collectibleclassics highlight that the vehicle is visually stunning and in great condition, with features such as a crack-free dash, clean underbody, and original paint on most body panels. Other users, including @ampeng, express positivity about the car's overall aesthetic and its maintenance. They note that the vehicle has been recently serviced and detailed, enhancing its appearance and functionality, which adds to its appeal. @packardv8 and @zachmac also point out its potential, suggesting that while there are some questions regarding the car's condition, it could be a worthwhile investment for the right owner.
Neutral: Several comments touch on the car's condition and the discrepancies noted in its features, with @TeddyV1978 raising questions about the instrument cluster and other interior inconsistencies, while @1783pictures points out oddities like the center console wood type and the omission of the original hood pad. @SlowNRusty and @Chicagomike provide additional insights regarding potential wear issues and the importance of understanding the historical maintenance of such vehicles. Thus, while opinions vary, there seems to be an acknowledgment of the car's complex history, neither fully negative nor completely positive.
Negative: On the other hand, multiple commenters express concern about the car's discrepancies, such as the misalignment of the trunk badge and potential misleading claims about the original paint. @jpq and @son_of_stig question the integrity of the badges and decor elements, suggesting that the car may not be as pristine as described. Furthermore, @zachmac and @Chicagomike raise important questions regarding mechanical issues like the timing chain, AC system functionality, and the state of other essential components, indicating that the vehicle may require significant work to restore it to its full potential.
|
 |
Positive: @WAGroup (The Seller) has positively described the car as a beautiful, original, standard M3 coupe, emphasizing its well-kept condition and rust-free status. They are supportive of potential buyers by offering help with transport and pickup in Columbus, OH. The car is depicted as a classic survivor, ready for enjoyment after comprehensive maintenance performed by Auto Assets, showcasing a solid service history with multiple checks and replacements to ensure its performance.
Neutral: Several commentators, including @Segura911 and @Karatekid127, expressed interest in additional visuals, specifically cold-start and driving videos, indicating a desire for more comprehensive evidence of the vehicle's operability. @NizFL raised a concern about the exterior temperature reading in a photo, while @kylezhen requested further images of the car's jack points. @WAGroup (The Seller) responded promptly to these queries, indicating their willingness to provide more information and photos.
Negative: @BrianIRLUSA noted a concern regarding the low mileage recorded on the Carfax over the past thirteen years, as well as sporadic service records which could raise questions about ongoing maintenance. Additionally, @terrynoah2004 inquired about potential issues with the shock towers or subframe, which implies worry about structural integrity. @WAGroup (The Seller) did address these concerns with assurances of the vehicle's maintained condition, including that there was no cracking observed.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters, including @bobski and @ClassicBrock, have praised the boat for its appearance and functionality, calling it fantastic and emphasizing its appeal as a direct-drive inboard vehicle. The nostalgic sentiments were echoed by @dzguy, who fondly recalled MasterCraft's reputation in the boat community and expressed envy for those who owned one. Others like @thedassler admired its aesthetics and performance, reminiscing about past experiences with similar models, highlighting their unique handling characteristics on the water. Moreover, the seller @Wheelcity1 provided additional insights about the boat's original motor and maintenance, further building excitement among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments express curiosity and seek clarification regarding specific aspects of the boat, such as @SjgPjg questioning the wear on the steering wheel despite minimal run time, and @AnnOnymous inquiring about the functionality of the dual speedometers. Additionally, the condition and maintenance history of the engine and cylinder walls were raised by various users, including @GMNAO, who emphasized the importance of understanding the boat's engine condition given its years of storage. The seller, @Wheelcity1, effectively addressed these queries, confirming the engine's well-maintained state and detailing the recent restoration efforts, which is appreciated by selectors looking for transparency.
Negative: Some negative remarks revolved around the boat's practicality and use concerns. @Manowicki pointed out the absence of a bow cleat in the boat's design, questioning how one would secure it effectively during docking. Additionally, comments like @KABKAL's expressed skepticism over why the boat had been stored for so long, implying potential issues regarding its maintenance or usability. Concerns were also raised about the storage conditions and the integrity of the components after extended inactivity, as noted by users such as @mrpotty, who inquired about details like fuel tank capacity and other performance-related metrics.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's impressive condition and maintenance history. @kurtwvf notes the presence of 15x8 wheels and discusses the quality features such as the four-wheel disc brakes (though disputed later). @Barryward and @MarkBartlett both express admiration for this Firebird, with the latter calling it 'Very Nice!!'. @gwn praises the car for being a one-owner vehicle for 48 years, underlining its rarity and the pride in ownership. @JayKay2430 reflects on the uniqueness of this Firebird Formula with the Oldsmobile engine, while @Habu2 points out that despite its mileage, the car is in clean condition. The Seller also emphasizes the vehicle's status as a well-maintained "time capsule."
Neutral: While there are a few neutral remarks about the vehicle, they mostly revolve around inquiries, technical discussions, and clarifications regarding features and history. @RMStafford asks if the vehicle is available for inspection in Oregon, showing an interest in possibly viewing the car. @Shigui points out an inaccuracy in the listing concerning the brakes, suggesting it should state 'front disc rear drum brakes.' @Chief-foraday, The Seller, provides a detailed explanation regarding a past incident involving the car that led to its front end damage, clarifying the story around its history. @my_two_cents shares a personal connection to the model but questions the seller's explanation about the car being dropped from a tow truck, illustrating a mix of nostalgia and curiosity about the vehicle’s past.
Negative: Concerns arise mainly about the vehicle's engine and previous damage, with several comments indicating a preference for originality. @Jprobisheaux expresses disappointment about the Oldsmobile motor instead of the desired 6.6 engine, claiming it detracts from the car's desirability. Some commenters, such as @Pfeil and @my_two_cents, express skepticism about the tow truck incident and its implications for the car's history and current condition. Other remarks hint at a general dissatisfaction regarding corporate practices in the automotive industry that led to changes in engine offerings, with @Pfeil lamenting the loss of uniqueness among brands. Additionally, @Chuckles69z28 raises concerns about the extent of damage and the vehicle's overall state, questioning whether the necessary repairs indeed restored the car to its prime condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 expressed admiration for the vehicle, complimenting its aesthetic qualities and suggesting sympathetic restoration. They emphasized the importance of engaging with the auction process this time around to avoid past mistakes. @Dollycat3 also appreciated the seller's response and engagement, indicating an overall positive view of the vehicle's condition and potential restoration benefits.
Neutral: @Vic noted the auction's current bid of $8,500, highlighting the ongoing interest in the vehicle without expressing a strong opinion on the matter. @Redbaron95 provided a balanced opinion on the color, mentioning their personal preference for darker vehicles while acknowledging that white is a practical choice for sunny climates. @Doremonger inquired about the vehicle's mileage documentation and situational details, which signifies an interest in specifics without judgment.
Negative: @Datsun911 challenged the seller's past responses, indicating some dissatisfaction with the lack of information previously. @FredOstad raised concerns about the engine functionality and potential leaks, reflecting a desire for clarity on the vehicle's mechanical state. @Redbaron95's comments pointed to a personal dislike for the color scheme, which may detract from the vehicle's overall appeal for buyers with similar tastes.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the car's aesthetic, particularly the unique blue and beige color combination, which was noted as dynamic and beautiful. @halrod1 and @2b2 remarked on the attractiveness of the color scheme, while @planetgargalon called it a perfect blend of class and enjoyment, emphasizing its well-loved status by an enthusiast. The seller, @goyetc, reinforced positive sentiments by sharing details about the vehicle's history and performance, explaining how it has been a reliable daily driver and how he aimed to maintain transparency in the selling process, garnering respect from various bidders.
Neutral: The seller, @goyetc, addressed concerns about the vehicle's history and title designation. He mentioned that despite being declared a total loss after an accident, the car has a clean title and has undergone significant repairs to restore it to its current condition. Comments from @jshiggy and @Static50 reflected confusion and curiosity about the vehicle's salvage designation and the seller's transparency, which @goyetc attempted to clarify by providing detailed responses about repairs made and his experience with insurance matters. This prompted further questions from other bidders, such as inquiries regarding the vehicle's maintenance and potential rust points.
Negative: Despite the positive and neutral comments, some potential bidders expressed apprehensions regarding the car's salvage history and the implications it might have on insurance and resale value. @DeathAwaits specifically questioned the insurability of the vehicle in California due to its total loss classification, which led to a lengthy clarification from @goyetc regarding insurance practices and state regulations. There were also remarks about physical elements of the car, such as the missing engine cover and potential issues with the headlights. Bidders like @jmann110 and @jax001 raised concerns about the car's upkeep and any hidden issues that might not be visible in the photos.
|
 |
Positive: Commenter @sabmiami (The Seller) provided detailed responses that instilled confidence in the vehicle's condition. They confirmed the car drives beautifully, has no frame damage, and provides assurance about the functionality of features like Airmatic suspension, stating it functions well with no electrical issues. Additionally, @sabmiami promptly addressed queries about keys, the location of the vehicle, and even offered a clear shipping quote for potential buyers, showcasing good customer service.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @SRGV and @Classyfellow, asked clarifying questions about the vehicle such as the presence of a Monroney label, keys, and shipping quotes. These inquiries reflect a genuine interest in understanding the vehicle's offerings. @SRGV also appreciated the quick responses from the Seller, indicating a positive interaction even if some questions remained pending.
Negative: There were some concerns raised by commenters like @Sonofzohan regarding potential damage to the passenger seat, and @FXRcR1 pointed out an error in the seller's description regarding the suspension type, calling attention to a discrepancy in representation. Although @sabmiami admitted the error, the initial miscommunication may cause potential buyers to question the reliability of the information being provided.
|
 |
Positive: @MarkNeely praises the RMAX as a great machine, indicating enthusiasm about its qualities and potential. His comment suggests that he believes the vehicle will provide enjoyment to future owners, especially highlighting its limited use of only 87 miles over two years, which indicates it may be in excellent condition for resale. He ends on a positive note wishing good luck to the eventual buyer.
Neutral: @Turbogator, the seller, provides context about the vehicle's use and previous ownership. He explains that the original owner was out of state, and upon their return, they discovered that their favorite trail area had transitioned to being accessible only by electric vehicles. This transition likely influenced the owner's decision to sell the RMAX, offering a neutral perspective on the circumstances surrounding the vehicle's limited mileage and current availability.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: Commentators express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic, with @BurningDinos noting that it looks 100% better without the spoiler and @Route71S complimenting its color and condition. Others, like @Saltmann and @GatorDMD, show appreciation for the detailing and overall beauty of the car. @NaplesLuxuryCars (The Seller) highlights that the Porsche 911SC is stunning in person and emphasizes the well-preserved condition and low mileage, stating that it is one of their favorites. The car is also noted for its strong performance and cold AC, which is especially welcome in Florida.
Neutral: Several comments address specific technical inquiries about the vehicle's history, particularly regarding the engine replacement and service documentation. @Pallen747 asks about the condition and previous sale record, while @Tripledigit and @KLR650 request details about the engine rebuild and compression tests. @NaplesLuxuryCars (The Seller) responds to these questions, indicating that documentation and service records are being prepared and that the engine has been thoroughly inspected. There are additional queries about the vehicle's AC effectiveness, as @Cgolseth seeks clarity on the performance of the original system.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about the car's maintenance history and previous conditions. @OldsRocketMan comments on the surprisingly low mileage of 2000 miles over 6 years, which is interpreted negatively. @1911WcLp fascinates over the concern about the car's restoration and previous state, referring to it as having been 'sitting in a dirt field'. There are also worries about potential oil leaks, as pointed out by @Tripledigit regarding a previous invoice noting a leak at the rear main seal, questioning if repairs were made. Overall, while the car garners positive attention, there are underlying uncertainties about its history and mechanical integrity.
|
 |
Positive: @NJNomadinNY expresses admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, calling it a "thing of beauty." @barryward humorously suggests he will bid on the Allante after finishing his chardonnay, indicating a light-hearted interest. @GeneDinger confirms the functionality of the radio and other audio equipment, promoting the car's good condition. He also mentions that the pull-down mechanisms for the trunk and convertible top work reliably, making the car user-friendly and well-maintained.
Neutral: @GeneDinger provides historical context about the car, sharing that he purchased it new in 1992 and that it has been mostly stored in a garage, which emphasizes its low exposure to the elements. He also explains that it was a gift for his father and that due to personal circumstances, it has been minimally driven since, making it more than just a vehicle for him. @53jd and @1935V8 inquire about the inclusion of a hardtop and the condition of the soft top, reflecting a genuine curiosity about the vehicle's features and history without negative implications.
Negative: @53jd questions the absence of information regarding the hardtop, implying a potential shortcoming in the listing. @1935V8 raises concerns about previous damage to the rims, referencing a notation in the provided receipts that suggests there may have been issues. Additionally, @1935V8 comments on the sagging appearance of the soft top in several photos, leading to speculation about the vehicle's maintenance and condition, which could deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @sommeraaron expressed adoration for the car, referring to it as cherished among friends, even mentioning plans to modify it humorously. @CoopCity shared enjoyment in spotting these vehicles on the road, imagining their unique owners. @bobballoo78 declared the 2013 Cross Cab his wife's favorite car, praising its reliability and spaciousness, showing that for some, this vehicle has a special place in their hearts.
Neutral: Several commenters noted the car's distinctive design and purpose. @yma10 quoted a Nissan executive, indicating that the vehicle is intended to make a statement rather than be a high-volume model. @S2000 (The Seller) also shared insight into the convertible's functionality and potential maintenance issues, while acknowledging the car's appeal to a niche group of passionate owners.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, many comments reflected a critical view of the vehicle's design and practicality. @MDW66 sarcastically described it as an answer to a question nobody asked, while @JB1971SX remarked on its odd proportions, likening passengers to floating heads. @Serj humorously commented on the imagined juxtaposition of this car with an Evoque convertible, pointing to the overall absurdity that some perceive in the vehicle's existence.
|
 |
Positive: @Sportsfann expressed interest in driving the vehicle for a video, indicating a positive excitement about the car. @James_MA praised the body style, suggesting that many appreciate it, while @Highlander63 complimented the good looks of the Nova and remembered fondly a personal story related to a previous Nova he had owned. @cdelguid (The Seller) echoed those sentiments by sharing a nostalgic connection to his first Gulf Green Nova from the 90s, which further highlights the car's visual appeal and emotional resonance with enthusiasts.
Neutral: Conversational exchanges included technical inquiries, such as @C3Lee asking about the column shifter's change and the missing heater controls. @Mr_Pav sought clarification on various modifications made to the car, including the removal of the heater system and lower vent controls, and pointed out details like a potentially bent rim and lack of arm rests. Responses from @cdelguid offered explanations regarding these modifications and reassured that necessary inspections were conducted on the car's rewiring, while also mentioning the absence of certain parts for potential buyers looking to convert it back to a daily driver.
Negative: While many comments were generally positive or neutral, concerns were expressed by @Mr_Pav about multiple factor modifications that may affect the car's usability. Questions about the safety and functionality of the rewiring were raised, along with worries about missing components that could hinder year-round use. @Thagano also brought up a potential issue with windshield fogging, which could represent another hurdle for future owners, particularly in states with more humidity and varying weather conditions.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the 2006 Mercedes-Benz R350, highlighting it as a unique blend of luxury, performance, and practicality. @deichenb perceives it as a 'good karma car', and @Chickna describes it as an 'awesome car'. @nightraveler69 appreciates the overall appeal, mentioning it looks like a nice ride and complimenting the drive video. @Jszttxxj praises the car's stylish design, stating it defies traditional minivan stereotypes. The vehicle's interior features, such as the premium sound system, heated seats, and innovative technologies, further enhance its luxury feel.
Neutral: The seller, @stathios, has been actively engaging with potential buyers by providing detailed information and addressing inquiries. @CarnieHobo asks about the maximum cargo length when the seats are folded, showing interest in the vehicle's practicality. @ski.dive inquires about driving the vehicle back to Florida, to which @stathios responds positively, confirming the vehicle's operational state. @monsoon725 asks about the condition of the wheels, and @cgeorge1 seeks clarification on the lighting specifications, indicating a desire for specifics regarding the car's features.
Negative: Some critical comments appear regarding the vehicle's classification. @Jszttxxj humorously notes that these are the 'most bad minivans ever made', suggesting a mixed view on the minivan concept itself. Additionally, @cgeorge1 discovers that the car may not include the HID lamps as originally thought, highlighting a discrepancy between expectations and actual specifications, and brings attention to the standard Halogen projectors installed instead, which may disappoint those looking for upgraded features.
|
 |
Positive: @richbob commented on the beauty and impressive qualities of the vehicle, noting that the 200 series represents incredible machines. @CRUSH also praised the build quality and longevity of these vehicles, stating that many vehicles today are not built to last as long as the Land Cruiser, and he expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle’s power and reliability. @TXTechRR shared a personal experience, mentioning how much he loved his 2017 model after a long road trip and complimented the cleanliness of the vehicle in the listing. @Vtran highlighted its aesthetic appeal, referring to it as a beautiful example, while @shamu89 expressed admiration for the Land Cruiser, calling it absolutely beautiful.
Neutral: @Metolius1419, the seller, provided clarifications about the vehicle's history and features, addressing questions regarding the passenger seatbelt and any repairs made prior to the sale. He noted there was a recall issue on the passenger seatbelt that had been resolved, and he shared prior damage that had been repaired on the rear tailgate. Additionally, he explained the reason for selling the 2017 Land Cruiser, which was due to purchasing a known 2018 model, establishing a connection to the personal history behind the vehicle's ownership.
Negative: @shamu89 raised concerns regarding the seller's quick decision to sell the vehicle and mentioned peculiarities in the Carfax report, including repair work done to the passenger seat and indentation issues with the leather seat. His comments suggest skepticism about the seller's motivations and the condition of the vehicle. This sentiment hints at a cautious approach from potential buyers, balancing the vehicle's praised qualities with a need for transparency about its past.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters conveyed enthusiastic support for the truck's performance and features. @adrenalinsports (The Seller) highlighted significant improvements in the truck after the installation of 3-lockers and a taller final gear ratio, making it more efficient on highways and enhancing off-road capabilities. @maw06 humorously remarked on the truck's imposing size, suggesting it wouldn't need a ‘Baby on Board’ sign, emphasizing its rugged appeal. @stugottz shared a personal anecdote about envisioning this truck as a first vehicle for his son, indicating the truck's strong appeal among potential buyers.
Neutral: Various commenters posed questions and expressed curiosity about specific features of the truck. @roverchef inquired about the locker options utilized, and @truthseeker asked for information regarding the CTIS controller, showing an interest in the truck's technological aspects. @patrickb6 queried about the presence of a PTO, to which @adrenalinsports (The Seller) provided detailed responses explaining the truck's specifications and modifications, conveying a genuine willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the overall positive impression of the truck, some comments hinted at the challenges associated with ownership. @stugottz mentioned how his wife influenced the decision against purchasing the truck for their son, underscoring potential parental concerns regarding practicality. Overall, there were no outright negative comments about the truck itself; however, the conversations reflected the hurdles prospective buyers might face in making a final decision.
|
 |
Positive: Multiple commenters have expressed their enthusiasm for this vehicle. @buttesilverbow enthusiastically declared their love for the car and its color, complimenting the presentation by @MatureMuscle, the seller. @HarleyRich referred to the car as a "great little mini-Corvette" and reminisced about their own enjoyable experience with a similar model, the Saturn Sky Redline. @leaffan praised the seller, describing them as one of the more respected in the community and highlighting the value of the car's pristine condition and low mileage.
Neutral: Comments also address various aspects of the vehicle's features and specifications. @poemtree noted that the vehicle should be listed as a Pontiac Solstice GXP to avoid confusion with the base model, prompting a response from @bringatrailer to confirm the update. The discussion included insights about the removable hardtop, with @ChopTop detailing the options available from Smoothline, the manufacturer, while @MatureMuscle confirmed the car's features and quality through their ongoing auction updates, providing detailed videos and responses to inquiries about the car's functionality and specifications.
Negative: Some negative comments focused on potential concerns regarding the vehicle's presentation and modifications. @MIckeyDH raised a question about the source of the hardtop, indicating a concern for authenticity and sourcing of materials. Additionally, @ChopTop pointed out that the front license plate holder had been affixed incorrectly, suggesting alternatives for remedying the situation, which may reflect negatively on the vehicle's overall presentation. However, @MatureMuscle addressed these issues with transparency, promising further updates and demonstrating responsiveness to buyer concerns.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed satisfaction with the vehicle, particularly @stj3 who commented on the exceptional driving experience of the Porsche Taycan GTS, highlighting it as a 'Porsche first and EV second.' @bardwell02 also praised the build and took note of desirable features like the variable light roof and heat insulated glass. @Evconversion chimed in, expressing love for the car's spec and wishing the seller good luck with the sale, indicating overall enthusiasm about the car's appeal and configuration.
Neutral: The seller, @JG_16, introduced himself and provided information when asked about the vehicle, explaining the quick sale was due to the previous owner's relocation. He confirmed the car is under factory warranty until June 2027. There were inquiries about recalls and the real-world range of the car; the seller explained the status of an open recall and stated the car's range is approximately 246 miles on a single charge, while also recommending getting feedback from Porsche forums about real-world performance.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding depreciation mentioned by @getchoshineon, suggesting that like most EVs, the Taycan could experience significant value loss. @kbulo questioned the necessity for the quick sale, while @Ak123 inquired about outstanding recalls and warranty status, indicating some uncertainty about the vehicle's reliability. The mention of an open recall and the dealership's inability to perform the service due to waiting for software updates may contribute to potential buyer hesitation.
|
 |
Positive: @NickW1 described the vehicle as a 'cool Motor Bike' and praised its components, noting the improvement brought by Sachs shocks and Brembo brakes. @GBRBiLL also found the bike to be very fun, stating that everyone who sees it smiles or looks astonished. @Sidecar11 (The Seller) mentioned that the bike is ready for adventure, having received oil changes and various new components, and also includes useful spares, demonstrating a well-maintained vehicle.
Neutral: @Sjalabais expressed curiosity about the limited use the bike has had, prompting @Sidecar11 (The Seller) to share that though it was intended for more travel, plans have changed, and it has mostly been used for small trips. @aloealoe noted an issue with a video upload from @Sidecar11, showing active engagement and interest in the seller's media related to the bike.
Negative: @MarkMontana raised concerns about the condition of the rims and their relation to a recall. Although @Sidecar11 assured that the rims are in perfect condition and not part of any recall, the initial question highlights potential apprehensions about reliability and previous issues with similar vehicles. Overall, there is a slight unease regarding the reasons the bike hasn't been ridden much despite its appealing features.
|
 |
Positive: @Electraglider shares an insightful perspective on the value of classic vehicles, emphasizing their ability to retain value and act like money in the bank. The excitement surrounding the purchase of the 1997 Toyota Tacoma, which was meticulously maintained by its previous owner, is evident, as the seller, @Vizmark2, provides detailed backstory and maintenance records. Many commenters like @AussieBenz and @passitbob express confidence in the truck's durability, highlighting Toyota's reputation for reliability and the vehicle's well-maintained condition, making it an appealing option for potential buyers.
Neutral: @Scagneti mentions that they find the truck nice but plan to wait before bidding, displaying a cautious approach. @Vizmark2 (The Seller) provides thorough details about the truck's condition and history, stating it has been well cared for with original components and minimal body repair. The seller also invites questions and seems ready to engage further, reflecting an overall expectation of interest in the auction process.
Negative: There are no significant negative comments regarding the Toyota Tacoma. However, @Electraglider briefly touches on buyer's remorse experienced by their granddaughter after purchasing the vehicle, which might indicate a cautionary tale for potential buyers. The seller acknowledges minor imperfections like dings and dents but reassures that overall, the truck is in great shape and ready for many years of service, which might alleviate some concerns.
|
 |
Positive: @gilchristm (The Seller) provided a detailed repair estimate, which is appreciated by potential bidders. This transparency helps to alleviate doubts and gives bidders a clear understanding of what to expect with the vehicle. The initiative to add videos of the car running also showcases honesty and a straightforward approach, which many buyers value highly.
Neutral: Several comments inquire about details pertaining to the vehicle. @greenbird09 asked whether credit card payments are accepted, to which @gilchristm (The Seller) replied positively, mentioning other payment methods as well. @Ritter7 requested a video of the vehicle’s startup and information about the A/C functionality, while @zombiesonics sought clarification on the inspection documents and oil leaks noted in the repair estimate, indicating that there are active discussions surrounding the car's condition and history.
Negative: @Spokayman pointed out that the vehicle has been color-changed, which contradicts the claim of original paint, raising concerns about potential paint deterioration issues. @gilchristm (The Seller) acknowledged this confusion but emphasized a commitment to honesty. Additionally, @Ritter7 learned that the A/C is not blowing cold, which may be a disappointment for some prospective buyers looking for a fully functional vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed high praise for the vehicle, describing it as 'Perfection!' according to @pip007. @Mstanfill mentioned that the car is on their bucket list and noted its perfect appearance in red, stating that it gives a feeling of excitement when driving. The general sentiment about the car's aesthetics was highly favorable, with comments like 'Gorgeous' from @Paschal and 'STUNNING SR I E-type' from @MNberg that further emphasized the attractiveness of its design, particularly in Carmen Red. Overall, the car was lauded for its beauty and performance, with @911r (The Seller) providing an enthusiastic video that showcased its driving capabilities and ease of handling.
Neutral: Several comments raised interesting questions and observations regarding the vehicle's details and history. @Toivo_ inquired about the discrepancies in the service invoices, noting confusion about the build date and model year. @Ecurbyo posed a technical question about replacing rear wheel cylinders, indicating a curiosity about the car's mechanics. Meanwhile, @tompdx provided an insight into the restoration shop that worked on the vehicle, appreciating their expertise without taking sides in any competitive discussion. These neutral comments reflect a mix of fascination and inquiries that come with owning such a classic car.
Negative: A few comments included critiques or concerns regarding the car. Specifically, @jagster911 noted uncertainty about the practicality of E-types, questioning whether they qualify as cars, which could suggest a mismatch between expectations and reality. Additionally, @TheOMDude hinted at a historical debate about the car's design, initially referencing a quote by Enzo Ferrari that may not have been accurately attributed. Such comments, while less frequent, indicate that not all perspectives were entirely glowing, with some commenters approaching the vehicle with a more critical lens.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described as an absolutely beautiful SL65 AMG with low production numbers and a hefty MSRP of about $190,000. @Bad_Chadi, the seller, has personally driven it for a week, describing its performance as effortless, thanks to the powerful Twin Turbo V12 engine that provides excellent torque and speed. Many commenters, such as @swb911s and @W140, express admiration for the engine's sound and smooth acceleration, highlighting it as a 'rocketship' that offers a remarkable driving experience. The maintenance has been thoroughly addressed, including the replacement of spark plugs and ignition coils, earning trust from potential buyers concerning its current condition.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about specific features and details of the vehicle, such as whether it is a 50th anniversary edition, and express interest in seeing videos of the vehicle in action, including a cold start and exhaust sounds. @AnkurGT and @Nacoocheejohn ask for various visual verifications, while others like @FORDSON76 and @Boogrubbs seek clarifications regarding shipping options and the vehicle's location. @swb911s and @Jschultz24 also engage constructively by discussing the car's maintenance history and features like the digital key, indicating a shared interest in the vehicle’s condition and functionality.
Negative: Some comments raise questions and concerns about potential issues with the vehicle, such as the maintenance history—specifically regarding whether both driver and passenger side ignition coils were replaced alongside the spark plugs. @swb911s notes the need for further inspection regarding the driver's side coil packs and questions the state of the front brakes, which may have a history of wear. Commenters express skepticism about the number of spark plugs and inquire about detailed readings, illustrating a cautious approach from potential buyers who want to ensure they're making a sound investment in this luxury vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @fsacb3 praised the vehicle, stating, "What a beauty!" This suggests a strong appreciation for the 1989 Land Rover 90 Turbodiesel 5-Speed's aesthetic or condition. The seller, @1600veloce, presents the vehicle confidently, highlighting that all their listings come thoroughly detailed and that they ensure a high level of care and enthusiasm in their offerings. Their active presence on BaT and commitment to quality are evident in their invitation for potential buyers to check out their facilities and thorough video walkthroughs.
Neutral: @Maroon_Womverine inquired about the vehicle's features, specifically whether it has air conditioning and if there are seatbelts in the back. @1600veloce responded, clarifying that the vehicle does not come with A/C but does include rear belts for the jump seats. Furthermore, @WAGONBOYTD made a comment about the engine's torque output, suggesting it is a capable workhorse while acknowledging it may not be the fastest option in its category. This indicates a balanced view of the vehicle's capabilities.
Negative: @WAGONBOYTD noted that the torque claim of 150 lbs is likely exaggerated, suggesting that it's closer to 140 lbs. This comment reflects some skepticism about the performance specifications provided by the seller. Additionally, the seller emphasized that bids are a commitment to purchase and warned potential buyers against placing bids without adequate funding, hinting at potential issues with earlier transactions.
|
 |
Positive: @Speaks911 praises the vehicle as it is cheaper and easier to run compared to a Cup car, highlighting its suitability for self-supported racing. @jml58 (The Seller) supports this perspective by sharing personal experiences, emphasizing that the car's engine is the same as in the street variant, making it robust and straightforward to maintain outside of regular upkeep. These sentiments are reinforced by @JACO001, who shares their positive experience regarding maintenance, labeling the GT4 Clubsport as an ideal choice for track days.
Neutral: @jml58 (The Seller) provides essential details about the vehicle's history, including a minor off-track incident that resulted in cosmetic damage but confirmed no structural harm. The seller reassures potential buyers of consistent service history and offers to connect with the servicing shop for more inquiries. Additionally, comments from @Rod and @SteveK-O raise questions about sound levels and fuel sensor reliability, which @jml58 addresses, confirming past issues but offering reassurance about the vehicle’s performance regardless of those concerns.
Negative: While the feedback is generally favorable, some concerns arise regarding maintenance specifics. @SteveK-O points out a malfunctioning fuel level sensor that has been troublesome despite repeated replacements, leading the seller to rely on other data for fuel levels. @toddjude inquires about whether the car was used for racing, and the seller confirms it was solely for track days, which may be perceived as a limitation by racing enthusiasts. There is also a mention of a continued cosmetic issue regarding the replaced bumper, which some may find concerning.
|
 |
Positive: @Dicko66 expressed excitement with a simple "Super!" while @Ranchero65 complimented the beautiful color of the vehicle. @Kevinlarry1978 shared a positive sentiment about the car saying, "WOW she’s a beauty!" and requested details about the engine. @Gopher428 enthusiastically noted the cool color fit for a Torino, highlighting the attention to aesthetics. Other comments from @Fastboater23 and @skychief9 echoed similar praises, mentioning the good looks and potential fun of the car. The Seller, @Crazy_nitro, also engaged positively, promising to provide more pictures for potential buyers.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle's features varied in depth, such as @Pic 41 questioning the presence of hood-mounted turn indicators and @Pic 74 addressing an empty dash pod possibly made for a factory tach. @DXM31 pointed out discrepancies in the car's identity as per the Marti report, as it indicated 'Cobra' while additional parts were labeled as 'Torino.' Observations about the oil pan's depth were made by @Beerman99, implying a need for clarification while maintaining a neutral tone. @AR66-67cars noted an unusual paint depth, prompting inquiry into potential repainting, further adding to the discussion surrounding the car's authenticity.
Negative: Critical remarks focused on various aspects requiring attention. @cycleguy55 expressed concern over the oil pan, calling it "a disaster waiting to happen," and suggested it should be replaced for better clearance. @Ozzybud mentioned that the hood might have been replaced, describing a mismatch in the expected features. @Icemocha0329 asked for additional pictures to confirm whether the engine was genuinely a 428 SCJ. @motordad8 warned the seller about the necessity to clarify the engine's authenticity, underlining that doubts might affect bidding interest. These concerns showcase a segment of potential buyers who prioritize authenticity and mechanical integrity.
|
 |
Positive: @gendia expresses admiration for the Ruby Red color, highlighting its beauty particularly on a 997. @Redscout describes the vehicle as a gorgeous cruisemobile, sharing their excitement after purchasing a different car. @911online compliments the beautiful color combination and expresses interest in the car's auction.
Neutral: @changedriven, the seller, provides detailed information about the vehicle, noting the car as an excellent driver free from accidents. They highlight the car's well-maintained features such as the Kenwood display with Wireless CarPlay and Android Auto, along with a thorough maintenance history. The seller mentions the optional nature of the Ruby Red color and its history in the Porsche 911 lineup.
Negative: @PNut raises a question regarding a potential scratch mentioned in a photo and inquires if service records are available. While @changedriven assures that they are working on providing scans of the necessary documentation, there is a slight concern about the lack of physical receipts prior to the seller's ownership.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its impressive condition and aesthetic appeal. @RedAndGreen praises the Corvette as an 'excellent example', emphasizing that it is all stock with no unwanted modifications, while @57hottruck expresses his admiration for the color and engine combination, calling it 'stunning'. @oldreliable reminisces about owning a Cyber Grey Metallic C6, recalling the consistent compliments it received over the years, affirming the vehicle's appeal. Others, including @Gotmath, explicitly mention ambitious bids and encourage participation with 'GLWTA', reflecting a sense of excitement for the auction. Furthermore, @RCMotor expresses nostalgia for the C6 Z06 as a 'poster car' since 2006 and remarks on its raw horsepower, demonstrating enthusiasm for this specific model.
Neutral: Several comments discuss technical aspects such as engine specifications and auction processes. @LimaBravo notes a swift progression in the auction, while @NWian and @Msirel inquire about details regarding the stock nature of the heads and original maintenance history, indicating a cautious interest in the vehicle's condition. @Racejh points out an inconsistency in image listings, prompting updates from the seller, @WZYWAL, who clarifies the factual inaccuracies concerning the VIN and provides additional images as requested. There is a flow of discussions surrounding logistics, such as the inclusion of original key fobs, with @camaro6662 confirming their inclusion in 'beautiful shape', exemplifying a constructive dialogue about the vehicle's attributes.
Negative: Concerns about specific details regarding the vehicle's condition and authenticity have been raised. @Racejh mentions a potential discrepancy in the auction images related to engine specifications, noting a picture that did not correspond to the model's advertised features. @Msirel and others express doubts regarding the originality of the tires and heads, prompting the seller to confirm their status. Additionally, @Vettes33 comments on the absence of videos showcasing the car, implying a lack of confidence from the seller in the auction process. @67ModCoupe raises questions about visible dirt or scrapes on the vehicle, echoing a general skepticism about the vehicle's presentation and led to responses from the seller addressing these concerns.
|
 |
Positive: @Remgogh (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm about sharing his pride and joy, highlighting that the vehicle has been a blast to own and is well-maintained, ready for a new owner. @bmdaia notes the rarity of the '964..' GT1-Block Mezger engine that adds to the car's prestige, referring to it as a keeper for the ages. @1lotus1 shares personal pride in owning a unique 2004 Turbo Cab X50 6 speed, emphasizing the model's rarity and their surprise at its limited availability compared to earlier models.
Neutral: Comments reflect a diverse perspective on the vehicle's rarity and desirability. @well_poop clarifies that the Mezger blocks, though common among certain models, should not carry excessive mystique among collectors. @johannes356 raises a legitimate question regarding tariff issues, to which @Remgogh addresses the import fees already settled during the vehicle's transition from the US to Canada, presenting confidence about the import situation.
Negative: @RDls3 argues against the perceived rarity of the Turbo models, insisting that minor part number changes do not warrant a classification of rarity. He challenges the notion that these vehicles are as collectible as some posts suggest, contrasting with his personalized, heavily modified vehicle he describes as truly rare. Furthermore, @RDls3's critique of the car's presentation, mentioning the hardtop in most photos, is met with an informative response from @Remgogh, attempting to clarify the car's features and their appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @Shane10p (The Seller) expressed excitement about selling the truck, highlighting that after acquiring it from the original owner, he invested time and effort into restoring its appearance. He made notable improvements, such as repainting specific areas to address clear coat failure and resealing the roof, ensuring the truck looks fresh and well-maintained. Additionally, @KevStang praised both the truck and @Shane10p (The Seller) as a great seller, reflecting a positive sentiment towards the vehicle.
Neutral: @Shane10p (The Seller) provided detailed answers to several inquiries about the truck's condition and history. He confirmed it is a non-smoking vehicle, that he can accommodate storage until pickup, and that a professional shop performed the painting work. He also included information about the total costs of the paint job and mentioned the common clear coat issues associated with 90s models, showcasing transparency regarding the truck's condition and restoration efforts. Furthermore, @Shane10p (The Seller) assured potential buyers about the truck's drivability, stating it has been used without issues since May.
Negative: While the overall response to the truck seems favorable, @javierGarza raised a question about the vehicle's reliability for a long-distance drive back to Texas. Although @Shane10p (The Seller) confidently stated that the truck could handle it without problems based on his experiences, the query reflects a potential buyer's concern regarding the durability or dependability of older vehicles, especially after acknowledging common issues like clear coat failures.
|
28-Years-Owned 1995 Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet 6-Speed
WP0CA2991SS341650
Lot 203225
Private Party
 |
Positive: @ScooterWilliams commented on the great presentation of the vehicle, while @shamansky expressed admiration for the 993 model, highlighting its beauty and driving experience. Additionally, @mdmba shared a personal account of checking out the car and being impressed by its condition and performance, noting that it started up perfectly and had no issues. The seller, @beckseuropean, also emphasized the car's readiness for road trips and the standards of care taken to maintain its quality.
Neutral: Several comments from potential buyers and observers sought clarification on various aspects of the vehicle. @AJS01 inquired about the actual mileage, referencing past issues with the odometer, while @winfieldryan asked if the top functioned properly and raised questions about the cassette deck's condition. The seller, @beckseuropean, responded openly to these inquiries, offering additional details about the car's mileage and maintenance history, including reassurance about the car's mechanical state, as well as addressing concerns about image clarity with @JetCity993RS and @BobSoCal.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's repair history and its cosmetic condition. @roughandtangle expressed unease about the multiple repairs to the top and questioned the seller's transparency regarding small oil leaks and the odometer situation, suggesting potential missing documentation. @JetCity993RS noted that some photos appeared to show scratches or issues with the vehicle's paintwork, while @BobSoCal pointed out that the pictures made it difficult to assess the car's paint condition. The seller, @beckseuropean, defended the quality of the car and its photos but acknowledged the existence of wear typical for a 30-year-old vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Electraglider praises the vehicle for its original aesthetics, noting it's refreshing to see one that hasn't been painted black, ultimately calling it a beauty. @Gary_T1 reminisces about the nostalgia attached to the model, representing an era of classic Americana, while @Bartruff1 connects the car to a historic achievement in racing, expressing a desire to own it despite space limitations. @Warrenlu (The Seller) provides active engagement by confirming details about the vehicle features, such as the factory vacuum wipers and the impressive trophy history, adding credibility to the car's value.
Neutral: @Warrenlu (The Seller) introduces the vehicle as part of a larger collection that has been in his ownership for an extensive amount of years, indicating that the car has been well-cared for and is part of a curated sale of classic cars. There are discussions regarding features like the vacuum hose and trophies, with @Warrenlu explaining that the trophies provided are all genuine, which adds context to the vehicle's history.
Negative: @prescue raises a question about the vehicle's ranking in the vintage car scene, indicating a potential inconsistency in its classification. @Electraglider expresses concern over the seller's previous consignments and their failure to reach reserve prices, suggesting hesitation among buyers regarding the seller's pricing strategy or the auction dynamics. Overall, there are hints of skepticism about the vehicle's saleability and potential pricing issues inherent in classic car auctions.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance and features. @JackSweny described it as 'SEXY', while @modernaristocrat found it to be 'Lovely' and well looked after. @genevamotorcars, the seller, highlighted that this vehicle is 'by far the nicest Diesel' they have ever had, mentioning its luxurious attributes such as massaging seats, heads-up display, and rear power seats. Furthermore, @AK61 called it 'Beautiful' and inquired about two keys and CarPlay upgrades, showing keen interest in the vehicle's modern features.
Neutral: There were several inquiries from potential buyers regarding specific details about the vehicle's condition and history. @hoffman12pete asked for any known issues and whether it would be safe to drive home after flying out. @gaadiwaala had multiple questions, including the status of the battery and whether there were any fault codes. @Philly911C4S requested a window sticker or a list of options, while @jKutsch inquired about extended warranty options, indicating that buyers are seeking reassurance and transparency before making a purchase decision.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, a couple of comments raised concerns about efficiency and potential issues with the vehicle. @commentdontbid pointed out dissatisfaction with JLR regarding fixes for telematics in older models. Additionally, there's an underlying sense of caution among buyers, with questions about engine reliability and potential issues with essential services like the diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) system. This reflects a general need for clarity and confidence from the seller to ease buyer apprehensions.
|
 |
Positive: @performanceautogallery expresses enthusiasm for the RA, mentioning that it is a great car and more than the sum of its parts. @flatfourdays, the seller, highlights the unique qualities of the 2018 Subaru WRX STI Type RA, emphasizing its mint condition and careful maintenance. He describes the Type RA as distinctive among Subarus, setting it apart in an exciting way, and expresses eagerness to see it find a great new owner. @mastro admires the vehicle's perfect color combination, further enhancing the positive sentiment about the car's aesthetics.
Neutral: Throughout the comments, @flatfourdays shares various details about the car's specifications and features, responding to inquiries from potential buyers. Questions about maintenance history, ownership details, and comparison to other models like the S209 indicate that there is a keen interest from the audience. @ultrasonyx and @imolaem3 ask for clarification about the car's upkeep and registration details, which @flatfourdays addresses with thoroughness, suggesting this information is vital for potential buyers considering the purchase in a well-informed manner.
Negative: There are no overtly negative comments about the vehicle, although @ultrasonyx and @imolaem3 raise concerns regarding ownership history and Carfax details, which imply that there may be some reservations among potential buyers about the legitimacy and past of the vehicle. Additionally, @fiveover seeks more information on modifications and startup videos, which may reflect uncertainty about the car's performance and alterations. Overall, while the comments lean towards a positive reception, there exist some apprehensions amongst prospective buyers regarding the complete transparency of the car's history.
|
 |
Positive: @glr103 (The Seller) describes the truck as a great vehicle that has never let them down, emphasizing that it has received the best care and maintenance. This suggests a high level of reliability and care put into the vehicle, instilling confidence for potential buyers regarding its dependability.
Neutral: @4tugo1972 raises some specific questions about the truck's air conditioning system and fuel mileage. They wonder if the air conditioning blows cold and whether any work has previously been done on it, and they also express skepticism about the 20 mpg figure shown, comparing it with their own experiences with similar models. This reflects a curiosity about the vehicle's performance rather than outright praise or criticism.
Negative: There are no explicit negative comments about the truck itself in this exchange. However, @4tugo1972’s doubts about the accuracy of the fuel mileage hint at concerns that a potential buyer might feel skeptical about the vehicle's efficiency based on their knowledge of similar models. This could reflect a broader hesitance based on personal experiences with past vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @chris_stor, has received positive remarks about the vehicle's steering stability after the build, indicating it operates well at both high and low speeds. The upgrades, including stronger ball joints and a larger steering rack, are noted to enhance its performance, making it suitable for both on-road driving and off-road adventures. The seller highlights that this Jeep is a Restomod with extensive upgrades to ensure durability and functionality, with attention paid to the center of gravity and off-road capabilities.
Neutral: Several commenters have sought clarification on technical aspects, such as the vehicle's gearing and differential specifications. @chris_stor confirmed that the gearing for the front and rear differentials is 3.73, which was designed to complement the manual 6-speed transmission. The seller also elaborated on the upgraded components like the skid plates and the two-piece rear main seal, which is common in this model. Comments also included discussions on the factory listing and modifications made during the build process.
Negative: Concerns were raised about minor issues with the vehicle, such as the rear main seal which is known to occasionally leak in the 4.0L engine model. Some commenters expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle's pricing, with @highspeedwithalottadrag noting that unmodified versions seem to command higher prices. Additionally, @MikeNoLomotel humorously referenced the oil pump's reliability while also mentioning the need for potential further inspections.
|
 |
Positive: @INTERCARUSA (The Seller) introduces the vehicle, a stunning diamond white, designo ML63 AMG, highlighting its impressive 5.5 Liter V8 engine that delivers 518 horsepower while maintaining daily practicality. This description encourages potential buyers by emphasizing the car's versatility and performance capabilities as a great one-car solution for enthusiasts. Another comment from @Wheeljo2 echoes this excitement, praising the drivetrain's blistering speed by comparing it to his own 2014 E63 S AMG and suggesting that emphasizing these features will likely increase the bidding interest.
Neutral: Both comments express a strong appreciation for the car's exceptional capabilities and performance, indicating that it stands out as an impressive model in the luxury vehicle market. The seller conveys eagerness to assist potential bidders with questions, portraying a welcoming and supportive approach that could foster a positive sales environment. However, no specific features or details about the interior, technology, or other aspects of the vehicle are mentioned, keeping the focus primarily on the performance aspect.
Negative: While the excitement for the vehicle's performance is palpable, there are no explicit negative comments provided. However, the lack of detailed insights into other areas such as comfort, maintenance, or potential drawbacks means that some buyers might feel hesitant without a well-rounded understanding. Additionally, @Wheeljo2's comment suggests a carefree approach to driving which may not resonate with buyers looking for a more cautious or practical daily driving experience.
|
 |
Positive: @Khartoum noted that the car is spectacular to look at, while @Gabboy36 expressed love for the car's beautiful color and interior. The seller, @AZHal, emphasized that the car appears in excellent condition for its age, showcasing its flawless paint and great mechanical state. Additionally, @SilverRS, who previously owned the vehicle, praised its upkeep, indicating a good maintenance history.
Neutral: @AZHal outlined various aspects of the car's features and history, confirming low mileage and mentioning that the supercharged inline-six engine is based on the Jaguar AJ6. The seller raised valid points about the challenges of maintaining a classic vehicle and expressed transparency about the car's mechanical issues, particularly with the AC having a potential pinhole leak. @AMfan shared insights into the reliability of the DB7 models, hinting that with proper maintenance, long trips could be feasible.
Negative: Several comments hinted at drawbacks, particularly regarding potential mechanical issues. @Bwlv raised concerns about the car being road-ready for a long trip and pointed out past AC problems. @MJN observed rattling noises during a video of the car's operation, prompting questions about the bushings and shocks. Overall, there were underlying worries about whether this car could handle regular use without significant investment into repairs.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the truck, noting its attractive design and unique 2WD configuration. @Button appreciates the vehicle's aesthetics and recognizes its appeal for someone who doesn't require 4WD, while @BuckysRanch praises the luxurious suspension, claiming it surpasses even newer trucks. @Mercury88 highlights the truck's pristine condition, mentioning that it would be a fantastic summer vehicle, reflecting a consensus that the truck is a rare find in excellent shape.
Neutral: There are also constructive questions regarding the truck, particularly about its maintenance and condition. @trw inquires about California emissions and maintenance history, while @Jimbob123 raises concerns about the original tires and their condition. The seller, @4byFreak, clarifies these points, asserting that the tires are well-preserved and that no leaks are present, indicating a solid maintenance background for the vehicle.
Negative: Some comments hint at skepticism about the truck's usability given its pristine condition. @bossross wonders whether it should be treated as a collector's item rather than a daily driver, reflecting a common concern among potential buyers about how to best utilize such a well-preserved vehicle. @Rizzo07067 jokingly questions if iPhones could even connect to vehicles from 2006, which highlights concerns about the truck's outdated technology, and suggests a lack of modern convenience features.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's build and modifications. @sdallasesq noted that the customizations were great and lamented when others opt for boring colors. @GuyToyota called the build clean and mentioned that the auction price reflects these mods. @SupraFreak complimented the truck's capabilities, suggesting it could handle extreme situations like a zombie apocalypse. @BBell333 praised the truck's looks and highlighted its iconic V6 engine. LucyBaldwin, the seller, enthusiastically shared that all modifications were carefully selected and done by a highly-rated shop, mentioning the truck's amazing presence in person.
Neutral: Several comments sought more information about the vehicle's performance and features. @simplexfish inquired about the lift kit and the tires, prompting LucyBaldwin to clarify that it features a 6-inch lift by Fabtech. @1979K30Chevy requested startup and driving videos, and LucyBaldwin responded affirmatively, promising to provide these soon after collecting videos from the past winter. Meanwhile, @BBell333 asked about the truck's highway performance at high speeds, to which LucyBaldwin assured that the ride quality remains fantastic even at 80 mph, sharing her experienced drives from LA to Vegas.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about specific aspects of the vehicle. @1979K30Chevy pointed out a warning light observed during a driving video, prompting LucyBaldwin to explain that it was due to a door ajar. She later corrected her response, attributing the light to a special mount for the Toyota Safety Sense sensor that was not yet installed at the time of the video. This response indicates potential confusion or issues users might consider before buying, even though Lucy aimed to reassure potential buyers regarding the situation.
|
 |
Positive: @buybid22 (The Seller) expressed satisfaction with the condition of the K1, stating that it is in really nice condition and rides well. @lemans850i shared a personal connection to the bike, reminiscing about his time working with BMW motorcycles and even having a picture with the bike. @ripper996 described the K1 as a classic BMW Motorrad, while @billpayne acknowledged its beauty with a sense of nostalgia. Others, like @IrishWhiskey and @ssaward, emphasized the iconic status of the motorcycle and shared fond memories, highlighting its unique features and design. @Particular noted that the K1 attracts attention wherever it goes, and @Vetdawg remembered having a poster of the bike in college, indicating its lasting appeal.
Neutral: Several comments presented a blend of technical appreciation and personal stories. @multistrada1 provided insights on the bike’s history, mentioning extensive wind tunnel testing and its impressive top speed. They also shared their own experience with a similar model. @buybid22 (The Seller) mentioned having additional literature related to the bike, indicating a commitment to providing potential buyers with complete information. @dominator pointed out the K1's display at the Petersen Museum in LA, underlining its significance as a collectible. This demonstrates the bike's relevance in both history and culture.
Negative: Some commenters expressed hesitations or minor downsides associated with the K1. @multistrada1 pointed out limitations such as the steering lock and excessive engine heat from the full fairing, hinting at practical challenges of owning the bike. @ssaward humorously described a burn received from riding, suggesting that the bike requires careful handling. Overall, while the K1 is celebrated for its design and performance, there are acknowledgements of its quirks and the potential for discomfort during use.
|
 |
Positive: @Sparrownaut expressed admiration for the beauty of the car, noting that it is an excellent entry point for anyone interested in the Brass Era of automobiles. @Davey_Jones enjoys seeing and hearing the vehicle run, highlighting its charm. @rackops loves the car's history and style, referring to it as cute and mentioning that it is a gem in the context of its presentation. Additionally, @FordT1926 (The Seller) appreciates the positive feedback and recognizes the car's historical significance, sharing insights about the restoration process and the sourcing of parts.
Neutral: @Sparrownaut mentioned some interesting technical aspects of the car, including its lack of certain modern features like a clutch, fuel pump, and water pump, while also explaining how it effectively operates without them. @Redvair humorously compared the historical context of driving such a vehicle to modern-day luxuries, while @jhalan pointed out that Maxwell was considered one of the top car manufacturers in America during its time. @BikerWilly encouraged @Barryward to bid on the car, emphasizing its historical value and appeal.
Negative: @cwsteel inquired sarcastically if the vehicle comes with kerosene for the headlights, reflecting concerns about its practicality. @rackops questioned the use of Phillips head screws in the restoration, suggesting a preference for historical accuracy in the car's appearance. @Mark635CSieuro asked about the car's capability to pass CA smog regulations, signaling a skepticism about its usability today. Additionally, @normadesmond's comment about the lack of mention regarding Mary Livingston indicates a missed opportunity to highlight a potentially significant part of the car's history.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its good condition and overall quality. @elimk3gti praised it as another great car by the "goats of BAT," while @tripperdre simply referred to it as gorgeous. Additionally, the seller, @911r, responded positively about the vehicle's maintenance, confirming no rust due to climate control and sharing that the air conditioning blows cold. Furthermore, @mserpe appreciated that the car still features jump seats in the back and noted that with all emissions gear intact, the vehicle should pass smog tests in any state without issue.
Neutral: Some comments focused on requests for information, with several users asking about specific features or maintenance details of the vehicle. For instance, @tjdamato84 inquired about potential rust and the condition of the air conditioning. Users like @mikelaca and @eddiemax asked for clarification on the heating system and the operational status of the differentials. The seller, @911r, provided relevant information in response, including links to videos demonstrating the vehicle's features and the maintenance history, though questions about paintwork and handling of vehicle compliance in California were raised by users like @jglobe and @CocoThunder.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some commenters regarding the vehicle's compliance with California emissions regulations. @hpark006 and @jglobe expressed doubts about its CARB certification, indicating difficulties in registering such vehicles in California. @jglobe mentioned that previous attempts to register a similar model had failed due to the lack of proper VIN recognition, and another user, @Marshall15, questioned the trailer wiring harness. Overall, while there was a general appreciation for the car, compliance issues left some potential buyers apprehensive.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments reflect a positive sentiment towards the vehicle's modifications and overall appearance. @RMQ333 expressed enthusiasm about the cocktail shakers still being in the trunk, considering it a fun driver. @funkaholik praised the restoration, highlighting the big block 5-speed drop-top, fuel injection, and modernized suspension, which he found to be a sweet ride. @Latemodel21 also appreciated the upgrades made to the Camaro and expressed confidence in its capability for long drives, indicating that the seller has prepared it to be reliable on the road.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the original color of the vehicle and its modifications in a neutral tone. @Muscleguy69 and @ssterry commented on how some references to the original Frost Green paint color seem irrelevant since the vehicle's current appearance is the focus. @Gundog2006 sought clarification on the engine rebuild details, demonstrating interest in the specifics of the modifications, rather than expressing strong opinions about them. @Bowerb19, the seller, actively engaged with questions and provided detailed information about the car's history and specifications, fostering further discussion without strong emotional undertones.
Negative: There are some negative sentiments regarding the vehicle's departure from its original color. @ssterry lamented that it was another Frost Green car that no longer retained its original hue, echoing a sense of disappointment among those who value originality in classic vehicles. @funkaholik's comment about the color change being sad was shared by others, as they reflected on the loss of the original color. Furthermore, @Gundog2006 noted the difficulty in obtaining paperwork on the engine rebuild, pointing out potential concerns about the transparency and veracity of the car's modifications.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's impressive condition and features. @the_patina_group, the seller, describes the FJ45 as one of the best-driving versions he's experienced, highlighting its exceptional cold A/C and smooth performance. Commenters like @CRUSH and @OPHALE appreciate the truck's eye-catching color and handling capabilities, noting its unique appeal compared to other vehicles. @Lunentucker even humorously refers to the A/C as a 'freakin' freezer,' underscoring its effectiveness and the overall enjoyment of driving the truck.
Neutral: The discussion also covers practical aspects of the vehicle, with potential buyers asking for details regarding fitment and the vehicle's specifications. @OPHALE raises questions about the cab's tightness and the impact of the Bose speaker on seat travel, demonstrating a thoughtful approach to understanding the vehicle’s comfort. Others, such as @wolfdog1210 and @newkirk2000, request information on the truck's bed dimensions and engine modifications, which @the_patina_group promptly addresses, showcasing the seller's dedication to providing potential bidders with necessary details for a confident purchase.
Negative: While the overall feedback is largely positive, there are minor concerns raised by potential buyers. @OPHALE notes the headliner appears to sag and inquires about the possibility of repair, implying a need for attention to detail in restoration work. Additionally, questions about the OEM wheels and overall mileage reflect some uncertainty regarding the authenticity of certain features. Nevertheless, the seller @the_patina_group addresses these inquiries satisfactorily, reinforcing the vehicle's strong reputation despite these minor issues.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's color and overall appearance, particularly noting the Forest Green Metallic finish and the combination with Savanna Beige leather. @StokelyVanCamp called the color 'simply lovely,' while @bsang highlighted the 'top notch spec' of a green over tan version with sport seats, noting its clean maintenance history. @BFR2 remarked that the car looks to be in phenomenal shape, ready for many more joyful drives, and @Bob_Teaford echoed this by praising the stunning color combination and showed interest in additional technical details about the engine.
Neutral: There were inquiries about various features and historical details regarding the vehicle. @Bklyndave74 asked about the operational status of the sunroof and windows, and if any detailed maintenance records were available, such as brake measurements. In addition, @Oatwilli requested information about the Porsche lettering on the door, while @tomdrums queried further about the lifespan of the IMS bearing installed in 2019, revealing a desire for transparency regarding the vehicle's maintenance history.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding specific aspects of the vehicle's condition and updates. @3066james questioned the purpose of an aftermarket intake hose and if it was a necessary modification. @Bklyndave74 sought information about the water pump's status, indicating that while the car appears well maintained, there were still uncertainties that potential buyers might have. Overall, the comments reflect a general curiosity about the finer details of the car while also expressing some apprehension about the technical integrity and history.
|
|
|
Positive: @GDogg commented that the Capri Blue color looks good on the vehicle, suggesting an aesthetic appreciation for its appearance. @StephenBell pointed out the rarity of a push to start feature in a 350 wagon, calling it a beautiful car, indicating the vehicle's unique and attractive qualities. @jturk described the vehicle as almost a unicorn, noting that it comes complete with a cargo cover and third-row headrests, which adds to its desirability.
Neutral: @4WHEEL_GERMAN, the seller, responded to inquiries regarding the vehicle's rear suspension airbags and driveshaft, confirming there are no issues—this indicates solid maintenance. Additionally, the seller mentioned that the tailgate and cargo cover function properly, offering reassurance about the vehicle's condition. The seller has also promised to provide videos of the vehicle, including a cold start and engine running, which may be valuable for potential buyers who want to see its performance firsthand.
Negative: @GLWTA asked about the rear suspension bags and front driveshaft, implying concerns about potential mechanical issues. @TWBChi raised a question about grinding on the vehicle's subframe and requested a mechanical evaluation, showing a concern for the vehicle's structural integrity. @Starservice suggested that there might be rodent damage to the firewall insulation, which raises alarm regarding the vehicle's history and condition, although the seller assured that there are no related electrical issues.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the overall build quality and upgrades made to the vehicle, particularly the LS3 engine, Tremec 5-speed transmission, Vintage Air, and C4 suspension enhancements. Commenters like @Monkeybutt and @68CamaroSS396L78 celebrate the modernized performance and comfort aspects compared to classic models, noting that the car has sufficient power and drivability, making it a good candidate for upgrades. @Savi05 also finds the build very nice, and @IXIEWTECH emphasizes how even enthusiasts of original models can recognize the car as spectacular due to its performance benefits.
Neutral: Several participants raised questions or provided information regarding the vehicle's specifications and ownership. @bubbarock53 inquired about the rear gear ratio and the frame type while @67coupe asked if the vehicle was dealer-owned or on consignment. The seller, @crownconcepts, clarified that the frame is a Motorsports custom frame and explained their practice as a dealership to acquire cars, enhance them, and sell them to appreciative new owners. This openness about the selling process and vehicle details was generally well-received.
Negative: Some comments focused on the vehicle's wheel size and stance, indicating that they could detract from its aesthetic appeal. @Royce59 and @Sharkfoodjohnny expressed dissatisfaction with the protruding wheels, suggesting that the car sits too high and would benefit from different wheels for a better look. @Vtec4ever questioned the choice to replace the original engine, whereas @gaw and @monkeybutt suggested that adjusting the wheels could be an easy fix for prospective buyers. Concerns about the car needing repairs post-sale at Barrett Jackson were also noted by @68CamaroSS396L78, raising questions about its condition following the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlight the vehicle's stunning Alpine white color, with @urgetodrive calling it gorgeous and @pizzaman09 noting the excellent combination with M contour wheels. @AnkurGT praises the example as incredibly clean and wishes they could bid on it. @Aweh and @MasterDebator both express admiration, with the latter calling it a peak example of the E36 M3. @WestsideCCS, the seller, emphasizes their passion for BMWs and details the meticulous maintenance performed on the car, including paint correction and ceramic coating, further enhancing its appeal.
Neutral: @ThumperMCS raises a question about previous damage to the front fender and hood, which @WestsideCCS addresses by explaining the vehicle's panels were replaced under factory warranty and that no prior damage is indicated. @ThumperMCS appreciates this insight and remains interested in the car, acknowledging the potential concerns for future resale value. Throughout the comments, various users express an interest in inspecting the car in person and validate @WestsideCCS's claims of the vehicle's condition, indicating a level of trust in the seller and the car itself.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's history are evident in comments from @ThumperMCS, who seeks clarification on the condition and history of the front panels, suspecting they may not have been replaced under ideal circumstances. The necessity of replacing the cabin air filter after delivery, while noted positively by @WestsideCCS, could imply potential overlooked maintenance in the past. Additionally, inquiries about the headliner and window seals by @m3eo suggest some buyers may be apprehensive about the car's overall interior condition.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg noted that the car would be a great gift for a daughter turning 16, indicating its appeal as a family-friendly vehicle. @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) promotes the 2011 Porsche Panamera 4S as an incredible find with only 3,900 original miles, emphasizing its pristine condition and one-owner history. @AJL1988 highlighted the value of the vehicle despite some skepticism, praising the seller's reputation for providing quality cars. Commenters like @bigdogandy and @collectibleclassics shared their admiration for the car, calling it a stunning find and expressing confidence in its value and potential auction success.
Neutral: @Utahdesi raised questions about the car's history, including the reason for its low mileage and its previous ownership, indicating curiosity about the vehicle's care over the years. @mblaksley offered a balanced view, suggesting the car is older and low mileage but not necessarily a jackpot find, while sharing concerns about the implications of low use on vehicle maintenance. @BCMac and @noboyscout discussed the car's specifications, particularly the differences in leather upholstery designs and the vehicle's mechanical aspects, providing potential buyers with additional information to consider.
Negative: @mblaksley expressed skepticism about the car being a 'unicorn' find, highlighting concerns regarding seals and maintenance issues that arise from very low mileage. @noboyscout pointed out potential ambiguities regarding the car's upholstery, questioning whether the interior met Porsche's designations for leather, which may affect buyer perceptions of quality. Despite the generally positive feedback, some comments echoed caution about investing in an older vehicle with minimal usage, hinting at concerns over long-term reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @KatManDew praises the truck as a 'factory fresh' and an 'awesome GMT900 specimen,' believing it can compete with newer models. @TPH56 highlights the rarity of finding a work truck version with such low mileage, stating that 'someone is going to get a lifetime truck.' @jaykay2430 appreciates the simplicity of the truck's design, noting it doesn't come with unnecessary electronic features, and believes it is a vehicle that doesn't require expensive extended warranties, unlike contemporary models. @Scott_S remarks on the durability of the truck's 6.0-liter Vortec V8 engine, referring to it as 'bulletproof.'
Neutral: @4byFreak (The Seller) explains that the pinstriping on the truck is painted on and has been on the vehicle since new, confirming it hasn't been attempted to be removed. In response to @Scott_S, @4byFreak shares the backstory of the truck, detailing how it was cared for by its original owner, an older gentleman who stopped driving due to health issues. The truck remained well maintained until it was eventually sold to the seller, who has taken pride in detailing and using it, explaining the significance of the low mileage and its condition with a video to assure potential buyers.
Negative: @RoyGbiv comments that it's unfortunate the truck is not 4WD, while @newcarpro shares detailed specifications of the vehicle which lacks some of the modern features commonly found in newer trucks. @Scott_S elaborates on this sentiment, calling the multifunction tailgate 'an answer to a question nobody asked' and expressing frustration with modern additions that sometimes harm functionality. @TPH56 also indicates a desire for a 4x4 version, stating that if it were, 'it would be mine.'
|
 |
Positive: The 2016 Alfa Romeo 4C Spider is receiving high praise from several owners and potential buyers within the comment section. @PaulSB highlights its uniqueness, claiming that the Alfa draws significant attention and creates intrigue, which is a hallmark of a special car. @lightguy expresses confidence in the model's potential value, suggesting that the 4C is a guaranteed winner in the collector's market. Meanwhile, @twin72us shares their enthusiasm for driving the car, emphasizing the joy it brings and hinting at the thrilling experience behind the wheel. This sentiment is echoed by @4CAlfa, who acknowledges that while the car may not be suitable for daily use, it stands out as a fantastic toy for enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Stacesendra (The Seller) shares details about the various upgrades included with the sale, such as a touch screen stereo and Focal speaker system, which enhance the car's appeal. The seller also clarifies the ownership history, originally stating they were the third owner before correcting it to fourth, which reflects an attempt at transparency. There is a shared dialogue about the condition of the car, with @dubaikhan and @Alphaboy1 discussing panel gaps typically seen in hand-built vehicles like the 4C, suggesting these issues are commonplace rather than specific to this model.
Negative: Conversely, some comments raise concerns regarding the car's history and maintenance, which may deter potential buyers. @gbat111 questions the number of previous owners within the relatively low mileage, implying a possible issue with the vehicle's desirability or reliability. @wcpbyrd points out a gap issue between the bonnet and front bumper, further expressing hesitation about the purchase. Additionally, @dubaikhan queries whether the car has been in an accident, seeking affirmation from the seller. These comments reflect skepticism among potential buyers, highlighting concerns about the car's condition and overall credibility.
|
 |
Positive: @Bajabronco described the vehicle as a great example of the rare solid color Baja Bronco by Stroppe and Associates, praising its excellent preservation and original paint. Other commentors like @Todd_Z and @Bschurr echoed this sentiment, highlighting its amazing and rare lineage that should be honored by the next custodian. @JGolden6677 also appreciated the Bronco's cleanliness and originality, further contributing to the vehicle's positive reputation among enthusiasts.
Neutral: There were several inquiries and clarifications about the vehicle's details. @Mikelinehan and @Shelby314159 asked for specific pictures of the dual shocks and about the status of Stroppe-supplied options, showing genuine interest in the mechanical aspects of the Bronco. CoastBuysClassics (The Seller) provided information about the roll bar, shocks, and previous modifications, such as the original key fob given by Bill Stroppe’s Associates, which is a notable detail for collectors.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the condition of the vehicle, particularly regarding the floor pans, which @Shelby314159 pointed out may have been rusted out. @CoastBuysClassics (The Seller) confirmed that the driver and passenger floor pans were indeed replaced due to rust issues, which are common amongst Broncos, suggesting a level of restoration that may need to be scrutinized by potential buyers. Additionally, @okbob made a lighthearted remark about missing the vehicle due to its production date, indicating a slight disappointment from fans.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning aesthetics and craftsmanship. @GatorDMD described it as "beautiful to every detail," while @RedArcadia noted it as a "proper restomod" that would make someone a happy customer. The seller, @silverarrowcarsltd, emphasized the vehicle's excellent condition, detailing a comprehensive restoration that ensures it 'drives incredibly tight and smooth.' Commenter @Jszttxxj praised the backdate as a perfect blend of historical significance and modern performance, encapsulating the essence of the Porsche brand with features such as a rebuilt drivetrain and period-accurate details.
Neutral: The comments included various inquiries about specific details of the vehicle's condition and functionality. @Adibfar asked for detailed information about compression and rust issues, while @Kimiwins1 inquired about potential smog and registration challenges in California. @SOFO sought clarification on the installation of electric power steering, indicating that potential buyers are keen to gather comprehensive details before making any decisions. The seller responded to these inquiries, stating that the car is rust-free and has undergone extensive servicing to address any concerns from potential buyers.
Negative: Amidst the praise, there were some skepticism and criticism regarding the authenticity of certain comments. @ryanhmusic questioned whether comments were artificially generated by AI technology, expressing concern about the value of such input within the community. Additionally, @Vktpd shared doubts about the logistics of purchasing the vehicle from the UK, reflecting apprehension about buying a car sight unseen. @LandSpeedster pointed out a discrepancy in the car's tire description, which raises questions about the accuracy of the listing. Such comments underline the importance of transparency and authenticity in the auction process.
|
 |
Positive: @Dake remarked on the instrument cluster's impressive design, calling it one of the coolest he's seen. @Surffly (The Seller) expressed excitement about the listing and his positive experiences with the bike, mentioning its unique features and praising the brand Bimota and its community. @PDXDave described the bike as a "perfect example" of a rare model and expressed a sense of longing to own such a special motorcycle, emphasizing the bike's high performance and desirability. Additionally, @AMMO911 considered anything under $30K to be a steal, indicating confidence in the bike's future value.
Neutral: @Surffly (The Seller) shared details about the bike's history and previous ownership, explaining its rarity and the context of its market. He provided insights about how he values this motorcycle, mentioning how it is likely the highest mileage bike in the USA and highlighting his personal enjoyment of riding it rather than just collecting. Additionally, @Garagerat provided background information on Bimota's history and design significance, aiming to educate potential buyers on the appeal and heritage of the brand.
Negative: There were no explicit negative comments about the vehicle in the discussion. However, @spudlyone expressed some hesitation about whether he would ride the bike due to having a history of enjoying high-performance machines but also feeling the urge to keep it pristine. His comment hints at a reluctance to use such an exotic vehicle for everyday purposes, which could signal a concern about wear and tear.
|
 |
Positive: @Diron05 provides a thorough and positive overview of the vehicle, indicating it is a well-maintained 1986 model, not an '84 as mistakenly referred to in some videos. He mentions that it is fulfilling for an E30 fan, and he has received numerous compliments on it. The interaction from other commenters, such as @hensdawg praising the car's beauty and @Christopher_Kohler describing it as a cool car with an attentive seller, adds to the overall positive sentiment surrounding its care and desirability. Additionally, @MCLeather appreciates the car's originality and unique specifications like the dog-leg 5-speed transmission.
Neutral: Several commenters raise questions regarding the vehicle's specifications, particularly about the engine designation and whether there has been any modifications. @rsporsche and others point out discrepancies about the engine type referenced in the auction listing, leading to a discussion about the correct identification of the engine model. @eric340r's inquiries about the European registration papers also highlight the need for clarity regarding the vehicle's history and documentation. @Diron05 assures that more information will be provided, indicating an ongoing effort to clarify any uncertainties without causing alarm among potential bidders.
Negative: Concerns arise mainly from discussions about the vehicle’s engine and documentation. @rsporsche and others express skepticism regarding the auction's description about the engine type, suggesting it may be misleading. Further, @brittany1960 brings up discrepancies with the chassis number on the block, while @iredellt questions the presence of liens and the clarity of paperwork associated with the sale. @Blackplate and others mention the need for factual evidence such as the engine number to settle discussions, showing a demand for transparency that indicates underlying doubts about the car's history and condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's outstanding preservation, calling it a 'spectacular' and 'breathtaking' example of a classic, with some referring to it as an 'absolute time machine'. The low mileage of just 348 miles after 51 years was highlighted as a remarkable feature, making it possibly the lowest-mileage 240D in existence. Several comments acknowledged the car's original parts and aesthetics, contributing to its status as a 'museum-grade survivor' and a 'time-capsule'. The seller, @Rags2, emphasized their intent to maintain the vehicle's originality, which resonated positively with many commenters who appreciated the meticulous care taken in its preservation.
Neutral: Several discussions revolved around the vehicle's history and its relatively quick resale within less than a year of its last auction. Comments indicated curiosity about why the car was being resold so soon after its last listing and whether the seller had addressed any mechanical or cosmetic concerns raised by potential buyers. There were queries about the condition of specific components like the A/C and external blemishes, with the seller providing assurances about the car's overall cosmetic condition and past maintenance efforts. The vehicle was acknowledged as needing minimal recommissioning, which also garnered a mix of concern and intrigue from various commenters about its reliability as a driving car compared to a showpiece.
Negative: Commenters raised concerns regarding the vehicle's overall drivability given its long period of storage. Issues like surface rust on the exhaust pipe and the safety of driving with the fuel gauge on reserve were highlighted. There were mentions of potential reconditioning needed for parts such as rubber seals and wiring to make the car a reliable option for occasional driving. Some potential buyers expressed wariness about the cost of repairs associated with older vehicles like this Mercedes, and others questioned the vehicle's functionality, asking for additional proof of its condition through videos or tests, which indicated a level of skepticism about how well the car would operate after decades of inactivity.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a deep appreciation for the Porsche 914-6, with many enthusiasts praising its condition, unique features, and the love and care that has gone into its maintenance. Users like @rstomp shared their positive experiences, noting the outstanding paint and brightwork, while others highlighted the smoothness of the shifter and the strength of the 6-cylinder engine. The auction prepares to attract serious buyers who understand the significance of this model, as indicated by comments such as those from @Lagrassa and @dr914, who recognize it as an excellent investment. Bill Noon, the seller, further emphasizes the car's pristine state and its rarity, inviting potential bidders to appreciate its authenticity and fantastic driving experience.
Neutral: Several comments disclose confusion or seek clarification about details related to the vehicle's history and mechanical status. For example, @KD914 corrected an error regarding the engine type, while @1911WcLp asked about repainting and oil leaks, reflecting a common concern among potential buyers. Meanwhile, @davenorcal expressed interest in the seller's checklist for assessing the vehicle's authenticity and care, indicating that clarity and understanding are crucial for enthusiasts looking to bid. The community engagement seems constructive, with comments from both prospective buyers and the seller facilitating an informative dialogue about the car's specifications and value.
Negative: A few comments pointed to areas of concern regarding the vehicle, such as @dr914's detailed critique of its authenticity regarding various components, suggesting some inconsistencies that may detract from its value. Additionally, @Bluesky raised a question about the oil weeping issue post-reseal, indicating potential issues with long-term storage affecting the engine seals, while @S_Cruz expressed disappointment with the engine's power, suggesting it may be underwhelming for some drivers. Such concerns highlight the need for prospective buyers to scrutinize the vehicle carefully before committing to a purchase, despite its overall acclaim and desirability.
|
|
|