Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the overall appeal of the Ferrari 575 Superamerica, with @Bullish noting its iconic status and @Wawaweewa! expressing a future desire to own one. The @rsautohaus (The Seller) showcased the vehicle’s excellent condition and recently replaced top, receiving appreciation from @Seaate20 for its striking colors. With contributions from enthusiasts like @Tombo62 and @Cabbage sharing their own positive experiences and admiration for the car, many agree that it's a beautiful vehicle representative of Ferrari's artistic design history.
Neutral: While most comments are positive, a few provide neutral insights, particularly regarding the electrochromatic roof feature. @AD15 and @Cabbage mention challenges with the tint, with the latter suggesting that it may have never functioned properly. @rsautohaus (The Seller) acknowledged these concerns and expressed a proactive approach by offering to cover repair costs if a solution is found. The seller also confirmed that the roof operates correctly, hinting at the uniqueness and quirks of owning such a model.
Negative: There are several concerns raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding potential issues with the electrochromatic roof. @Tombo62 and @otoupalik caution that the tinting might not function as expected, with @AD15 doubting if it can be repaired at all. @WolfBarnato provided more specific information about the high cost of replacing the roof with an OEM part, indicating the difficulties that new owners might face if purchasing the vehicle. The general sentiment suggests while the car is visually stunning, it has complexities that might require careful consideration from potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle with many praising its aesthetic and the seller's approach. @Fuelieguy highlighted the impressive quality of Glenn Pray's builds, asserting that this Auburn is gorgeous and can be improved without significant investment. @Longforlineup appreciated the strategy behind the seller's decision to relist the car at no reserve, indicating confidence in the demand for such a classic vehicle. The general sentiment is that it is not only a beautiful machine, but also a unique opportunity for collectors, as indicated by numerous favorable responses from various users.
Neutral: The seller, @59caddyman, has taken the time to address several inquiries and concerns raised by commenters. He assured prospective bidders that the car runs well and performs reliably, and he has responded positively to suggestions for additional documentation and mechanical checks. @Sunoco260 brought up mechanical considerations, questioning the car's features and suggesting a compression test, which the seller agreed to perform and share results for, displaying transparency in the auction process. Overall, while comments vary in focus, there is a clear attempt from the seller to provide reassurance and additional information to support the auction.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the vehicle, questioning its mechanical aspects and the lack of documentation verifying its history. @touchyu2 specifically asked about essential documents, the original chassis plate, and connections to the Auburn brand, reflecting skepticism over the car's claims. @Sunoco260 also expressed worries about the vehicle's condition, particularly around the efficiency of the Columbia transmission and the potential hazards of driving a classic car without proper alterations, such as an operational horn and reliable braking features. These critiques indicate a level of caution among potential buyers regarding the car's true reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters generally express admiration and excitement over the Porsche 911 America Roadster being sold. @boaboyoz and @Shadowboxster highlight its stunning aesthetics, praising it as an 'exquisite example' and a 'beauty, inside and out.' Meanwhile, @GreenLine emphasizes its rarity, pointing out the unique appeal of this model among Porsche enthusiasts and wishing @Wob good luck with the auction. Many comments reflect a sense of community appreciation for the car’s special features and its place in automotive history, with @GDogg calling it an 'absolute gem' that captures attention with its visuals.
Neutral: Several comments raise practical questions about the car's sale process and features. @cruisecar88 inquires about the seller's role in handling the title transfer and lien payment, indicating a need for clarity in the buying process. Additionally, @radiojones and @spreener request information on the engine badge and paint condition respectively, suggesting that potential buyers are attentive to details that could impact their purchasing decision. @Wob, the seller, addresses these questions thoughtfully, indicating a commitment to transparency and thorough communication.
Negative: While there is generally a positive response, some comments express concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @europeangtcarbuyer points out perceived inconsistencies in the appearance of the seats across different photos, and questions about other potential blemishes suggest a desire for complete assurance about the car's condition before bidding. Overall, while the reactions are predominantly positive, there are indications that some buyers are cautious and seek reassurance about the vehicle's quality and authenticity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 2005 Ford GT, noting its stunning red color and low mileage of just 5,975. @boaboyoz described it as an 'absolutely FABULOUS' specimen while @ACRSNK enthused about the car looking great in red. @KICKINGTIRES highlighted it as the perfect package, allowing for enjoyable driving without significantly impacting resale value, indicating the Ford GT's rising value in the market. @inbcapital, who previously owned a red Ford GT, mentioned that these cars are worth every penny, with minimal maintenance required, and @Scott_S remarked that the car still looks great even after two decades. Overall, comments reflected a strong appreciation for the car's design, performance, and the driving experience it offers.
Neutral: Several comments included inquiries and discussions about the vehicle's specifications and maintenance history. @2003pilot raised questions about paint protection film and service records, while @Franko289 asked about authorized service locations in Florida. The seller, @CarCaveSRQ, responded to questions, confirming the absence of paint protection film and the completion of comprehensive service including oil and fluid changes. Moreover, concerns about the accuracy of the speedometer were addressed, with @CarCaveSRQ providing a detailed explanation to reassure interested bidders. Overall, these comments showcase a blend of curiosity and information-sharing regarding the car's history and maintenance.
Negative: While the overall sentiment was positive, some comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle's speedometer and maintenance. @thehappycrab noted the speedometer seemed inaccurate in a driving video, prompting responses from @CarCaveSRQ to clarify that it was functioning correctly. @nota4re pointed out a potential oversight in the transaxle fluid service, highlighting the importance of thorough vehicle maintenance. Additionally, there were discussions about the car's usability with @ssterry questioning if anyone drives these cars regularly, suggesting that some users might treat them more as collectibles than practical vehicles. Despite these concerns, the presence of knowledgeable commenters helped rectify some misunderstandings around the car's service and functionality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Maxwell077 loves the coupe styling of the vehicle, asserting it is better looking than open cars. @CarCaveSRQ (The Seller) expresses excitement about offering the XK120 FHC, noting its high quality, tasteful updates, and exceptional performance, including a smooth shift with a modern 5-speed transmission. Additionally, @jerichomtn comments on the extensive body-off restoration that adds value, while @Chefgordiemac considers it one of the most beautiful cars ever built, sharing warm wishes.
Neutral: @GIPPY observes that prices for similar cars are dropping as the market changes, suggesting the car may serve as a bellwether. @Sniff38 agrees with this observation but adds a note about broader trends affecting pre-1960 cars. The discussions also highlight details about the car's features, such as the inclusion of original parts and modifications like AC installation, prompting questions from @werthie and @m.rod about its functionality and components.
Negative: Conversely, several commenters have expressed reservations about certain modifications. @59turner notes uncertainty about whether the car would be 'bellwether material' due to personal modifications. @BigPlanDan worries about the impact of off-style seats on the car's value, with @rmessner audibly declaring the seats should be replaced. @86Cab highlights that the current seats resemble a '70s Ford Escort rally car rather than being appropriate for the classic Jaguar aesthetic, although they recognize the value of the included original interior.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @TeslaJames: Beautiful spec., @GWHUK: Lovely. Good luck with sale., @Aburg: Beautiful car. You don’t see ones without factory shields often., @boaboyoz: This Garden State F430 looks great, and scintillating in silver – GLWTA!, @theforce88: Beautiful car, good luck.
Neutral: @imgcars (The Seller): The car was recently serviced in July of 2025, and we had a dealer go through the car, no issues. I will upload the service records shortly. Regarding clutch life, it is at 72%, and the headers and exhaust are stock. I also confirmed the tires are from 2019. There is a small sticky issue with one window switch, but no major concerns have been reported in the recent inspections.
Negative: @RallyCross: Any service records? Are the headers / exhaust factory or aftermarket? Do you have clutch life remaining to share?, @MPMotorsports821: There looks to be a white powdery substance all over the engine bay which could be a sign of cracked headers. Did they inspect those?, @AD15: Not to say they aren’t fine, but unless the headers were specifically checked with a smoke test (or similar), no one can confirm they are fine.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect an overall admiration for the 1998 Mercedes-Benz E280 Avantgarde, affectionately known as "Ruby". @Dean_Laumbach, the seller, describes the vehicle's clean condition and how it has been well-maintained, requiring only minor servicing since purchase. Commenters like @MonteCutlass and @Bmyers5525 express their excitement about the car's unique features and its appealing color. Enthusiasts like @MichaelAtt appreciate the car's extraordinary condition and the passion of its previous owners, indicating it has been well cared for. Many find its rarity and manual transmission particularly appealing, celebrating it as a 'unicorn' in the marketplace.
Neutral: Several comments provide thoughtful insights regarding the vehicle's features and history. @gssas60 shares a personal experience with a similar E-Class, noting a fondness for well-maintained examples like Ruby. @Dgroos2084 acknowledges the car's specification, commenting on how Mercedes could have better competed in the sport-luxury market. There are also technical inquiries, such as those from @Bumpo and @glorybe, about maintenance records, the clutch condition, and the presence of traction control. These neutral observations highlight both the intrigue around the car and the prospective buyers' desire for more information before placing bids.
Negative: Concerns were raised by a few commenters about potential issues with the vehicle. @Motorsportsuk mentions having many problems with a similar model, citing paint and electronic issues, while @mveautour questions whether the head gasket has been changed, reflecting apprehension about maintenance history. Additionally, @HTL2 and @jgibbs express curiosity and skepticism about the operational status of certain features, such as vacuum-operated headlight adjusters, suggesting the existence of potential faults that may deter some interested buyers. Overall, these negative comments indicate caution among prospective bidders regarding the car's reliability and technical conditions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the impressive features and rarity of the 2022 Ford GT, emphasizing its stunning appearance without a stripe and loaded with lightweight options. @FloridaPerformance1 notes it's a "STUNNING" car in all white, while @NAIUSA (The Seller) points out the unique factory matte finish and several high-value upgrades, making it an appealing buy for collectors. @engishrodder mentions the joy of owning such a car, stating that it is a 'great drivers car' and expressing excitement for the auction.
Neutral: Several comments address the auction details and the vehicle's mileage. @NAIUSA (The Seller) encourages potential bidders to review the window sticker and explains that the 13 miles were put on by Multimatic for testing before leaving the factory. @GTFRAN points out the auction provides insights into market trends, comparing it against previous sales. Additionally, @heatncool inquires about a carbon fiber box that typically comes with such vehicles, suggesting that some auction details could be clarified.
Negative: While the overall sentiment is generally positive, there are some mixed feelings expressed. @E.Bugatti voices a desire for the traditional stripes, questioning the "Dark Energy Upgrade", which adds an element of doubt regarding the car's modifications. @porsche1986 expresses a preference for lower mileage, indicating a typical hesitation among buyers when it comes to high-performance vehicles. Meanwhile, @BabyD69 speculates on the need for trailering the car due to its low mileage, suggesting it may not have been driven extensively.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @harveyherman shared their nostalgic feelings about a past vehicle and expressed that this truck could serve as a good replacement. @DRIVEGUY appreciated the Fentons and dual carbs addition to the engine as a nice enhancement. @emorsch described the pickup as absolutely gorgeous and reminisced about missed opportunities, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @tlcamg praised the beauty of the truck and expressed intent to watch the auction closely.
Neutral: @Dbc23, the seller, provided several clarifications about the truck, including details about the heating and cooling system, confirming it was installed by the previous owner and is functional, operating on R-134a refrigerant. They also noted that the truck has a 12-volt system, a new battery, and has reached speeds of 60 mph under good conditions. The original temperature gauge is not operational, but an electric fan and VDO gauge were installed for better accuracy.
Negative: Some commenters raised questions and concerns about the vehicle's condition. @thecooter noted possible corrosion on the radiator and sought clarification on the air conditioning system. @UscPhd97_ asked if the AC system is cold and inquired if there was any sound insulation under the floor mat. Overall, while the truck received many compliments, the comments also indicated a clear interest in ensuring its operational integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @e9er expressed love for the color combination of the vehicle, while @Tunasandwich called the car beautiful and @moekim (The Seller) noted it has amazing character that never gets old. @Hathawaytime shared fond memories of owning a similar model, stating they loved their 98 triple black M Roadster. @Aupunter enthusiastically mentioned that their ‘99 model with the same engine has plenty of power, making it fun to drive, adding to the positive excitement surrounding this vehicle.
Neutral: @moekim (The Seller) expressed enthusiasm for the auction, highlighting the car's excellent mechanical and cosmetic condition, and addressed common concerns about trunk welds and overheating. The seller reassured potential bidders that proper preventative measures were taken with the trunk welds and the cooling system, making the car reliable, especially in varying weather conditions. This transparency, along with offers to provide further inspection or details, showcases a confident yet neutral insight into the car's maintenance and history.
Negative: @Duchesshs shared some skepticism regarding the trunk weld reinforcements, hoping they hold out, as they previously underwent a more comprehensive treatment known as the Randy Forbes kit. Although they wished the seller good luck with the sale, the comment suggests a lack of complete confidence in the modifications made. Despite @Duchesshs's concerns, there were no major negative comments about the car overall, indicating mostly positive sentiments from other commentators.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @johnnyvett described the vehicle as a great-looking, clean 1981 model and praised its color combination. @vincelopresti echoed this sentiment, calling it an awesome Vette, particularly noting one of the pictures as classic. @NCRSmaniac added that it was a great-looking car, noting its impressive visuals and value, while @jrb007 commented positively on the car's condition, describing it as pristine and with an interior resembling that of a low-mileage vehicle.
Neutral: @Lancealot asked about the date codes on the tires, performance of the air conditioning, and any potential overheating issues, displaying a practical interest in the vehicle's functionality. @velocityCC raised questions about the odometer's accuracy, while @GeeToeTiger mentioned the importance of documentation for mile verification on older vehicles, stating opinions on odometer tampering. @Jhurlow (The Seller) provided answers to these queries, asserting the air conditioning worked well and confirming that the vehicle had only been used lightly, referring to the condition of the interior as an indicator of mileage.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, there are concerns about the vehicle's true mileage from various commentators. @velocityCC questioned the integrity of the odometer readings, suggesting signs that the mileage may not be accurate due to parts replacement that wouldn't be typical for a low-mileage car. @sipx claimed the vehicle was a 110,000-mile car with a history of rolled back mileage. @MattFarley referenced conflicting mileage reports from Carfax, while @Noisyboyz highlighted potential odometer tampering, ultimately leading to uncertainty about the car's actual condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the Camaro's build quality and aesthetic appeal. @funkaholik highlighted the uniqueness of the Fathom Green color compared to more common shades, stating the build was outstanding. @FerrariMikeF355 reminisced about his thrilling experiences with high-powered Camaros, suggesting this vehicle would offer similar excitement. @DM7 (The Seller) confirmed outstanding power numbers of around 860 hp with a total of 900 tq, indicating exceptional performance. Overall, numerous users, such as @boaboyoz and @Izzold, praised the car's appearance and sound, contributing to a highly favorable perception of this vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on technical details concerning the car's manufacturing and registration. @Plainguy inquired about the VIN and title situation, while @L8842767 raised a question about whether the car is considered a kit car due to its Dynacorn body. @ChipCurrey and @Cali-Duetto discussed registration possibilities in California, emphasizing the importance of the correct VIN for potential buyers. @JohnnyLoophole's questions related to the challenges encountered during the build provided insight into the vehicle's construction specifics. Commenters generally appeared interested in understanding the nuances behind the car's specifications and registration processes, without leaning too heavily on judgment.
Negative: Some comments expressed concern about the ambiguity surrounding the vehicle's VIN and its classification as either a replica or an original car. @Red99 noted the presence of multiple VIN tags, raising questions about their implications for registration and title transfer. @Spl311serg echoed these concerns, suggesting that verification in California might present challenges due to the vehicle's Dynacorn tag. @Notdoneyet also questioned the compatibility of the car with California's registration processes, referring to potential difficulties with smog checks and the state's SB 100 procedure. There was an underlying tone of concern regarding the clarity of the vehicle's status, which could influence buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Slam105 expresses enthusiasm for the Alfa Romeo, mentioning his long-term ownership of a similar model for over 20 years, highlighting the fun and unique experiences it brings. @alfadoc supports this view, noting the rarity of the automatic model and its fun driving experience. @volzke appreciates his own 91 Veloce automatic too, suggesting enhancements like adding a squadra chip to improve performance, showing that the car can be enjoyable despite it being different from the manual version.
Neutral: @MARKFX (The Seller) provides detailed information about the vehicle's history and service, confirming minimal use in recent years and consistent maintenance practices like oil changes. He is transparent about the lack of a tonneau cover and confirms that the airbag warning light is functioning properly. Potential buyers seek more information regarding the car's readiness for long-distance travel and maintenance history, which @MARKFX addresses, further enhancing transparency about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @kuratz and @daveinky raise concerns about the automatic transmission, suggesting it might decrease the vehicle's value and expressing disappointment that a manual option wasn't available. @Spider_Mike and @Slam105 also discuss the challenges in finding knowledgeable Alfa mechanics, emphasizing the difficulties faced by owners of these cars in maintaining them properly. Overall, there seems to be a lingering sentiment that the automatic version limits the car's desirability and performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed excitement and appreciation for the Tesla Roadster featured in the auction. @sweetleon highlighted the vehicle's unique sound capabilities, noting that it provided sound effects for a Batman vehicle that won an Oscar for sound editing. @IronJoe mentioned the value of the battery upgrade, indicating it covers much of the car's cost, while expressing enthusiasm for the vehicle's long-term potential. Others, like @BigGar and @BlitzLead, pointed out that these vehicles will likely become highly valuable collector's items in the future, reinforcing their admiration for the car's unique attributes and potential.
Neutral: @Mimibird (The Seller) shared insights into the auction process for the Tesla Roadster, indicating it would be relisted as a No Reserve auction to increase bidder engagement. They also noted that the car has a Hollywood connection through its use in film sound effects, which adds to its character. Commenters like @IMK67 inquired about specific upgrades, such as the 3.0 upgrade, and @dimitriparis addressed aspects of the vehicle's condition, including battery details and steering feedback, signaling a general curiosity about the car's performance and history.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the condition and maintenance of the Tesla Roadster. @IronJoe mentioned that most Roadsters require suspension work due to age and the weight of the battery, estimating significant repair costs for those who might attempt DIY solutions. Additionally, @dimitriparis queried about the hardness of the steering, expressing a desire for more clarity on the vehicle's mechanical state, which may deter some potential buyers who are cautious about investment risks and vehicle reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @CottonClark praises @genevamotorcars for their solid reputation and professionalism, recalling a positive experience purchasing a vehicle from them. They express their satisfaction with the car, noting they continue to enjoy driving it in Texas. @genevamotorcars also highlights the car's excellent condition, having undergone thorough servicing, and reassures interested buyers about the health of the e-machine motor and the battery.
Neutral: Multiple users, such as @mfm26 and @rmorin49, seek clarification on the battery condition and potential issues, indicating uncertainty about its health and the costs related to replacement. @genevamotorcars consistently provides information about the vehicle's service history, including a replacement e-machine motor and battery health reported at 94%. Discussions also center around additional options like warranties and added features like hitches, reflecting concern for potential future costs and functionalities.
Negative: Concerns are raised by commenters like @Thetatebaumercollection, who mention the high costs of battery replacement, while @vman932 questions the reliability of the seller's claims regarding battery prices and warranty options. @etkrakow expresses skepticism about the vehicle being relisted for sale shortly after the previous auction, indicating possible issues with buyer confidence. These comments suggest an undercurrent of wariness about the vehicle's long-term reliability and the seller's claims.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Chamba expressed strong enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its unique features like the three-on-the-tree manual transmission and period-correct hubcaps, even stating that they love it more than when the seller originally purchased it. @mef0629 described it as beautiful and noted that all necessary restorative work has been completed, indicating it is ready for enjoyment. Similarly, @Blizzard340 praised the vehicle's color and condition, reinforcing the positive reception of its aesthetic aspects.
Neutral: @Dangler sought confirmation about the original color of the vehicle, which @overton (The Seller) confirmed was indeed Spring Green. @searcher356 appreciated the originality of the restoration, adding specifics about the vehicle's components and clarifying terminology related to the steering parts, which demonstrates a knowledgeable interest in the vehicle's technical aspects. @churchill_classics also admired the vehicle's color and mentioned some potential concerns about fluid observed on the tires, seeking clarification from the seller.
Negative: @BrooksAT raised concerns regarding potential leaks noted in the listing and questions about a driving video, hinting at the possibility of underlying issues. @overton (The Seller) addressed these concerns by describing the leaks as 'seepage,' which might be minor but would still need attention in the future. Additionally, @yyaroshe cut to the chase, indicating a strong interest in purchasing the vehicle, but the comments reflect a mixed reception overall with attention being directed toward mechanical concerns.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express strong admiration for the vehicle, emphasizing its exceptional engineering and suitability for a variety of conditions. @Jonesy66 describes it as the top of the range, while @saddlesore notes that it has proven to be very popular. @Spider_Mike highlights the bike's capability as a go-anywhere vehicle and mentions that future owners could create exciting success stories from extraordinary locations. @Bobsbikes (The Seller) supports these claims by detailing the bike's extensive comfort and performance packages, claiming it is in nearly perfect condition and ready for adventure, having undergone meticulous care and maintenance.
Neutral: The discussion includes various inquiries about specific features of the bike, particularly regarding the suspension system. @saddlesore poses questions about whether the suspension adjusts automatically or manually, to which @Bobsbikes responds with detailed explanations of how the bike handles suspension settings in different riding modes. Other users, like @Brinatr42, asked about seating compatibility but later moved on when the information was found. There is a collaborative tone in the comments, with some feedback focused on the technical aspects and the seller's clear communication.
Negative: Some comments convey a sense of frustration with the seller’s communication, particularly related to the suspension height feature. @saddlesore notes that the seller should have clarified the suspension model earlier, implying it was a significant oversight. @saddlesore's concern highlights a feeling that crucial information was not adequately addressed in the auction listing. Additionally, there is a sentiment of disappointment due to the seller's personal situation as expressed by @lubricator, who expresses empathy to @Bobsbikes regarding his health issues that necessitate selling the bike.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @shepant (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm about selling the ZR-1, highlighting it as one of the most enjoyable driving experiences they've had. They appreciate the car's refinement, stating it performs excellently both in cruising and tight corners. @BigGar notes that the car is a classic representation of the C4 era and appears to be well-presented and fun to drive, showing that the model continues to garner respect among enthusiasts.
Neutral: @shepant also shares some background on the car's condition and service history, discussing maintenance that was performed by previous owners, though admits not being fully aware of the reasons behind some of the service actions. They confirm the paint is original after inquiry from @silvernations and explain that the door graphics might be removable, responding to questions about the car's aesthetics and modifications asked by @F1Guy.
Negative: Some commenters, like @Gato100, expressed concerns about coordination for an inspection, citing logistical difficulties due to @shepant being out of state. Furthermore, @FrankFuchs queries about the age and condition of the tires, with @shepant confirming they're not original and elaborating on the difficulties in obtaining original Goodyear tires. There seem to be hesitations from potential buyers regarding the verification of the car's history and modifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @e9er praised the vehicle's setup for fun driving, particularly liking its color and RS stripes, although they suggested larger fog lights. @RDublu referred to it as a 'boss survivor' and noted that the SF Bay Area has many great examples of this car. @gogounou suspected the build would bring a lot of joy to its next driver, while @Floridabmx commended the tasteful modifications and perfect stance, emphasizing the vehicle's appeal as a driver's car. @coopspeed highlighted their familiarity with the car and its previous work done by a skilled technician, advocating for buying it with confidence, and @hano remarked on the quality of parts sourced for the car, assuring that the new owner would be pleased.
Neutral: Comments from @Antonelli (The Seller) provided insights into the car's history and modifications, detailing its evolution to a fully converted tii and mentioning ongoing maintenance is part of owning a vintage car. @Joezeeuw and other users asked for specifics regarding the wheels and repairs, indicating interest in the car's technical details. It's also worth noting that @Redbaron95 downplayed the importance of a working clock in an older vehicle, emphasizing that the engine and drivetrain's functionality should take precedence, which resonated with some commenters. @ShamrockRally made a lighthearted remark about the clock potentially being a distraction from the car's impressive performance.
Negative: While many comments were positive, @bayarea2002driver quipped about a clich�e9 automotive ad that often claims "AC just needs a recharge," highlighting a skepticism toward common car sales pitches. @SalmoTrutta mentioned concerns about the auction potentially getting too expensive, expressing a desire for a more affordable option. The discussion around the vehicle's age and the breakdown of secondary features, such as the clock, further hinted at concerns regarding the practicality of older car ownership, as shared by participants like @Redbaron95 and @Broovy, who noted the high likelihood of ancillary features failing over time.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is described as a well-maintained 2005 Carrera S Coupe that stands out due to its stunning Atlas Grey paint and modifications like the Fabspeed exhaust, which enhances its sound quality. @Euro_Classica (The Seller) emphasizes that this car is not only a blast to drive but also serves as a perfect daily driver or track weapon. Several commenters such as @carsbydusotti and @professorgearhead echo these sentiments, highlighting the car's clean condition and its enjoyable driving experience, with features like the manual transmission being particularly praised.
Neutral: Commenters have expressed differing views on specific aspects of the vehicle, including its paint. @SwissMovement noted how the Atlas Gray Metallic paint can appear nearly black in photographs but was still pleased with its overall look. Questions regarding paint meter readings have been raised, with @4SAnalog inquiring about potential readings to assess paint integrity. @Euro_Classica (The Seller) has been proactive in addressing these inquiries and providing updates, noting that the car has had paint protection film (PPF) applied, which may affect new readings.
Negative: Concerns have been voiced about potential mechanical issues, particularly regarding the IMS bearing and bore scoring, which are known risks for this model. @professorgearhead and @TH110 mentioned these issues, but also indicated that they believe the car's mileage might reduce the likelihood of such problems. Additionally, @paddict8 pointed out irregularities in the airbag cover, while @VetteZ06NJ raised a potential concern about paint damage, which @Euro_Classica (The Seller) clarified was simply glue residue from the PPF. These discussions reflect an undercurrent of worry among potential buyers about sustaining issues even if satisfied with the vehicle's appearance and performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @stugottz praises the Mustang as a clean and well-optioned vehicle, referring to it affectionately as a "sweetheart." @Hoppy18 and @Everson198 echo this sentiment, noting the car's well-presented condition and desirable features like air conditioning and automatic transmission. @whs66 also admires the vehicle, highlighting the attractive burgundy color and recalling fond memories of their own similar Mustang. Furthermore, @rocketron appreciates the front bench seat, mentioning that it often sparks conversation among enthusiasts.
Neutral: @CarFoolLane provides insights about the car's modifications and historical details, noting that the car was redone in the 1990s and discussing the implications of features like the fog lamps and added accessories. The conversation indicates a mixed understanding of the originality of certain elements, with @90IROC (The Seller) providing clarifications about the vehicle's condition and options, affirming the importance of in-person inspections for potential buyers. The discussion also touches on tire age and overall appearance, with @Skisworld mentioning concerns about the tire’s age despite @90IROC confirming their near-new condition.
Negative: @Silvercarfan raises concerns about potential rust issues as seen in specific pictures of the vehicle, prompting requests for additional photos from @90IROC to clarify these points. @Skisworld and @Los86 also express worries about the condition of the rocker panels and the possibility of rust. @CarFoolLane questions the installation of fog lamps and other dealer accessories, stating that these might have been added after the fact, suggesting potential discrepancies regarding the vehicle's originality. Overall, while the car garners many compliments, there remains a notable focus on its history and current condition, indicating that some buyers may need further reassurance before committing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GenauAutoWerks highlights that this 1995 Jaguar XJS Convertible is a beautiful example with a stunning interior and low mileage of just over 40,000 miles. The car has a clean CarFax and has recently undergone a fluid service, indicating well-maintained condition. The Seller states that the Jaguar is a great choice for collectors who appreciate classic British styling.
Neutral: @Scliffe mentions that while the I6 engine isn’t particularly fast, it is reliable and enjoyable to drive. This comment suggests a balanced view on the vehicle’s performance. Additionally, @C15A1 provides a comparison to another Jaguar XJS convertible being auctioned, noting the differences in mileage and specifications, which provides potential buyers with useful context for making a decision.
Negative: @Commissioner_Gordon expresses concern regarding two similar vehicles being auctioned concurrently, suggesting it could detract from both sellers' chances. @Borealis116 and @MarcPoin inquire about specific functionalities like the power seats and air conditioning, indicating some uncertainty about the vehicle's current operational status. @GenauAutoWerks confirms that while the AC was functional, they could not verify the status of other features, highlighting potential buyer concerns regarding completeness and reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments reveal a strong appreciation for the vehicle's condition and history. @Dollycat3 highlights its beauty and wonderful color combination, claiming it to be their favorite. @BobLuther emphasizes its status as an award-winning 'Ponton Survivor' with original features and low mileage, indicating the respectful treatment by previous owners. Many commenters, including @Jgrahamdmd and @Jaybird_57, express admiration for the car's originality and maintenance, with @no_cents noting its quiet engine and impressive torque during their drive. The overall sentiment is that this car is a true gem in the classic car community, eliciting nostalgia and fond memories from many owners of similar models.
Neutral: Some comments provide additional context about the vehicle, discussing characteristics such as its original paint and interior materials. @1996MBZ shares their father's positive experiences with similar models, while @etip mentions having spare parts for a similar car needing restoration. Other remarks, including @Sobonke's inquiry about sun visor condition and @BobLuther's assurance of the car's details through videos and descriptions, establish a friendly dialogue about the vehicle's features and maintenance over time without expressing strong opinions.
Negative: While there is a general positivity towards the car, a few commenters bring up minor points of concern. @hr47cars suggests that a decent driving video could enhance buyer interest, indicating that current video content may not fully showcase the car's capabilities. Additionally, @Sobonke asks for clarification about the drooping sun visors, a detail that may detract from the car's otherwise impressive appearance. Nonetheless, these negative remarks seem to be minor compared to the overwhelming positive feedback from other commenters.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle being auctioned has received positive comments regarding its condition and modifications. @TulsawaggyFJ, the seller, mentioned that it runs beautifully with all systems functioning correctly, including cold AC and hot heat, which many bidders found reassuring. Commentators like @Espanolie praised the vehicle's appearance and useful modifications, indicating that it stands out in the market. Additionally, @TulsawaggyFJ noted that the Scheelmann seats are a significant upgrade, improving comfort and cockpit space, which could potentially make the vehicle more appealing to larger drivers.
Neutral: In terms of specific inquiries about the vehicle's components, several comments from users like @MikeNoLomotel and @triedal were aimed at understanding the technical performance better. @MikeNoLomotel asked about the double-cardan rear CV drive shaft, expressing a general interest in the vehicle's overall stability and handling on the highway. @triedal focused on the gear size and axle shaft brand, which @TulsawaggyFJ answered, indicating that the vehicle maintains its stock gearing and utilizes RCV inner axle shafts. These kinds of discussions provide potential buyers with essential technical insights, enhancing their understanding of the vehicle's overall quality.
Negative: A few concerns were raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding its ABS system. @Snagnbass asked about the ABS light being constantly on, to which @TulsawaggyFJ explained that it was a common modification made by the previous owner to bypass sensor issues caused by lifting the vehicle. Although this may not affect driving or handling, it does raise questions about the vehicle's modifications and their implications for future owners. Additionally, while the seller made assurances about the condition, the presence of a consistent issue like the ABS light can give potential buyers pause, indicating a need for further assessment.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The overall consensus about the 2016 Harley Davidson Wide Glide 103 is quite positive, highlighting its fun ride and enjoyable performance. @Sstrickstein mentions that the low seat height and narrow profile make it ideal for zipping around town, while also noting the bike's throaty roar and growl of the exhaust, which adds an enjoyable attitude to the ride. Many commentors, including @Jimm1900, appreciate the bike's sound and aesthetics, suggesting an overall admiration for its design and features.
Neutral: Comments regarding the bike's condition, particularly the tires, are met with a more neutral stance. @Jimm1900 inquires about the age of the tires, to which @Sstrickstein clarifies they are not particularly old but indicates the rear tire may need refreshing. This neutral feedback suggests that while there may be minor maintenance needed, the overall condition of the bike, including its performance enhancements such as the Vance and Hines FP3 tuner, reflects a level of care from the seller, ensuring potential buyers are well-informed about the vehicle's status.
Negative: There are few negative comments regarding the bike, mainly centered around potential concerns about the tires. @Jimm1900 raises a question about the condition of the tires, hinting that they may be a bit worn. @Sstrickstein responds by affirming the tires are indeed usable but implies that a replacement may be in order, reflecting an awareness of the vehicle's upkeep. While there is no major backlash, this suggestion paints a picture of minor concerns that could factor into a buyer's decision.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the aesthetic appeal and specifications of the vehicle. @baloo points out that it has the right color, mileage, and location, making it an enticing option for a drive. Additionally, @Everything_Werks notes the unique history of the vehicle, and several users are keen on a potential bidding situation, with @Arts992 expressing excitement about the possibility of no one placing bids, suggesting they are eager to acquire it for the right price. @mrwoolery brings a modern twist, highlighting the availability of paddle shift kits to enhance the driving experience, which could add value to the car.
Neutral: Some commenters express curiosity and seek more information about the vehicle's condition and history. @ckroneschmidt's inquiry about registration leads to clarification from @bprgroup (The Seller), who confirms that it is registered and titled in Montana. Questions also arise regarding the repainting of certain panels, with @wesleym noting discrepancies in bumper and hood panel gaps. Overall, there seems to be a mix of intrigue and concern regarding the car's backstory and modifications since its import from New Zealand.
Negative: Several concerns are raised about the vehicle's potential issues. @wesleym speculates about the possibility of an accident, questioning the integrity of the body panels, which leads to further skepticism regarding its California registration requirements. @Everything_Werks mentions that the car shows signs of potential wear from its time in New Zealand, suggesting it may need extra scrutiny. The mention of the vehicle's tough licensing challenges in California adds to the negative sentiment, as users wonder if these hurdles might be hindrances in the sale process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mynameistimo expressed enthusiasm for the truck, envisioning it as a regular part of their life. @RicFlair is excited about potentially picking it up soon, while @SaabSnob referred to it as a 'true holy grail truck', demonstrating admiration for its value. @Davidlee8 praised the seller as honest and knowledgeable, highlighting the rarity of finding a truck in such good condition and indicating trust in the purchase.
Neutral: @Vetdawg (The Seller) introduced the vehicle as a true time capsule and provided extensive details on maintenance work done, including timing belt and oil changes. The seller aims to clarify the quality of the paint job, rating it an 8 out of 10, and mentions that the truck's design quality is legendary. There is also mention of some minor imperfections in the paint and interior, with the seller addressing inquiries about the condition of the seats and frame.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns, such as @butch1950 questioning the state of the frame and overall condition, to which the seller reassured there were no issues. Queries about the painting of moldings and any stains on the carpets surfaced, while comments like @Tigger1994 inquired about the quality of the paint job. Additionally, @butch1950's questioning of why the truck is being sold after only nine months raised suspicions, highlighting a need for transparency.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @SwissMovement expresses excitement about the rare experience of seeing the car in person and wishes good luck to the final bidder. @New001, the owner, praises the vehicle's sublime chassis, engine, and transmission, highlighting its stunning looks and comfort. @aecar echoes this praise, adding that the Roma is not only beautiful but also an excellent touring car that maintains a luxurious interior even after extensive use, thanks to its high-quality materials. @boaboyoz admires the specific color combination of the Roma and considers it a lovely build. @Granturismo finds the Roma intriguing, noting its beauty and positive reviews, while @cardino shares that it is a fast, enjoyable, and reliable car for daily driving.
Neutral: @chobbsey questions the identity of @Sunshine31, implying some confusion over ownership, and @1kw inquires about practical details such as paint protection film and lien amounts. @MikeWHO asks about additional items that may come with the vehicle, such as a second key, battery trickle charger, and car cover. @Snowhill raises questions regarding the car's maintenance status and whether it has an extended warranty, indicating a practical interest but no strong opinion about the vehicle itself. @clean_machina suggests that maintenance should be straightforward as it's covered by Ferrari, but this relates to the car's upkeep rather than its attributes.
Negative: @LB1 expresses disappointment with the successor's looks, suggesting that they prefer the Roma as a classic. @1kw voices skepticism about the lien situation, questioning the seller's disclosures and raising concerns over the clarity of title ownership. @OneOfEach critiques the quantity of photos provided, insinuating that they lack substance and do not offer useful information to potential buyers. @Drdjet tries to clarify the lien situation but engages with @1kw in a way that indicates a level of frustration with the concerns raised. Overall, these comments reflect a mix of dissatisfaction and uncertainty regarding the sale's particulars.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments for its unique features and remarkable condition. @tedobrien stated it is the cleanest 200SX they have ever seen, while @Charleetuner marveled at the amazing preservation, considering its age. @The_Dude_Abides emphasized the car's rarity, stating it is one of the best left. @HollyPBBC expressed excitement about the car, evoking fond childhood memories. Additionally, @Frost highlighted the rare alloy wheels, noting that the car is truly one of a kind, further solidifying its desirability among collectors and enthusiasts.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle also include discussions on its specifications and comparisons to other models. @M6911T900TCA8L inquired about specific features like the A/C and shared their own past experience with a similar vehicle, indicating a connection among fellow enthusiasts. @losmorob provided insights from their ownership experience and mentioned the vehicle's overall completeness. The seller, @Competitioncars, actively engaged with potential buyers, clarifying features and sharing additional information about the car's uniqueness and excellent condition, which contributed to an informative atmosphere.
Negative: Some comments reflected mild disappointment about minor details. @AutoTraitor humorously expressed disappointment over the door not being 'a jar.' @losmorob raised questions about the A/C's performance, indicating it might not meet expectations. @Fez made a comparison to a less desirable vehicle, which may suggest skepticism about the Datsun's aesthetic appeal to some. Overall, while the comments were predominantly positive, these few remarks hint at areas where some potential buyers might have reservations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Nitram15 expressed admiration for the truck, praising the seller’s mother-in-law for purchasing it and describing it as a positive experience. @Stropp called it a super cool truck and inquired about its top speed. @boaboyoz described it as a magnificent 'Manitoba monster' and appreciated the build quality, encouraging potential bidders with "GLWTA!" @Captainpua echoed the excitement, wishing good luck to all bidders and complimenting the seller. Overall, commentors found the vehicle impressive and unique, with its quirky design and engineering drawing admiration.
Neutral: Several comments sought factual details about the truck's specifications. @Kryan45 (The Seller) provided answers regarding the top speed and gear ratios, noting that the tires have a rated top speed of 40 km/hr. @m37charlie and @pdoray14 engaged in technical discussions, asking about the axle types and the unusual Ford engine in a Dodge vehicle. @SteveBarry asked for dimensions while @luckyscottcraig inquired about power steering capabilities. These neutral comments demonstrated a blend of curiosity and technical interest about the vehicle's features and modifications.
Negative: Criticism emerged regarding the vehicle's unconventional engine choice and its street-legal status. @Detroitrealist pointed out the odd engine selection, although he still acknowledged the truck's overall coolness. @pdoray14 directly questioned, "Ford powered Dodge. WHY??" while @Ezpass103lip voiced concerns about registration challenges in different jurisdictions. @LtED9319 made light of the truck’s features, comparing it to a forklift, which added a humorous but slightly critical slant to the commentary surrounding its practicality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, with @WhiskersTheCat calling it a solid car and @Caffeinated sharing a nostalgia-filled vision of it being utilized by a student. @SloopJohnB highlighted memorable ads that connect to the car's identity, and @ennisk1 praised its reliability after a long trip. The design received compliments, particularly the headrest from @SamHenry, and @spaceroam described it as a dream car, particularly highlighting the brown interior. Overall, the sentiments predominantly reflect a sense of affection for the Volvo 240, with comparisons to its virtues and nostalgic connotations.
Neutral: The discussions touched on the car's utility, with commenters like @schigh and @Dittoman2024 discussing practical applications and experiences with driving similar models. @MohrImports, the Seller, provides a transparent communication style about the car's history, issues, and current condition, inviting potential buyers for direct inquiries. Various commenters raised questions about specific features, such as jump seats and undercarriage condition, ultimately showcasing a mix of curiosity and practicality surrounding the purchase.
Negative: Conversely, there were concerns regarding the car's undercarriage, with commenters like @GriffinGuy expressing dismay over the compared state of corrosion from previous listings. @VolvoDoug and @JohnDoe351 pointed out discrepancies that may affect buyer confidence, while @masterqi raised questions about the dry ice treatment allegedly failing to maintain protective layers. @sportscar311's inquiries about its emissions testing also indicate a lingering uncertainty among potential buyers about the car's past performance and maintenance. These criticisms suggest a cautious approach among some viewers, as they navigate the auction landscape.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boardwalkcapital (The Seller) highlights the reliability and driving enjoyment of the vehicle, emphasizing how well it has been maintained. @rmxtgh compliments the car's beautiful color, adding to its appeal. The seller's message creates excitement about the auction of the car, indicating that it has been a joy to drive and will please the buyer.
Neutral: @zoltan questions the timing belt change interval, speculating if it was based on the car's age of 10 years. The seller confirms that the change was indeed necessary due to the age rather than mileage, showing a commitment to keeping the car in good condition.
Negative: There are no significantly negative comments provided regarding the vehicle in the discussion. However, @onlyhonda4me’s initial remark denotes that the vehicle had an odd appearance when new, though this has changed to a more favorable view over time.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @BitontoAutos mentions the beautiful color combination of the vehicle, while @Baronvonbrutus regards it as one of the most beautiful cars ever made, capable of outshining any vehicle in a new car showroom. @e9er reminisces about spending time in a similar model as a child, highlighting the beautiful design and the air conditioning system. @Middler89 describes it as a stunner and wishes they had the space for one more car. @usturpinm expresses admiration for the car's overall aesthetics and asks specific questions about its technical features, indicating a strong interest despite being new to the model.
Neutral: @David_C. reflects on the impact of earlier Riviera models on the perception of later versions, noting how they could have garnered more attention if not for their predecessors. @kink56 inquires about the performance of the new torque converter, and @modernmode questions the color combination of the interior. @mlenoir raises a question about potential fluid leaks, showing concern for the vehicle's condition while simultaneously appreciating it. @Rivnut clarifies that the steering wheel is usually matched to the interior color.
Negative: @TattooBill raises a concern whether the passenger door has been modified, suggesting possible restoration issues, to which @Bulletmotorsportsinc, the seller, provides clarification. @Spudster offers a critical view on the red interior, likening it to giving the car a split personality. @jer5ak emphasizes the superiority of the fuel injection system over carburetors, hinting that some may prefer traditional setups. There are also mentions of uncertainties such as the existence of fluid leaks and the performance of the car's amenities, which might detract from its appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @SnoDawg expresses excitement about the bike's speed, stating it looks fast, while @Zippy0002 (The Seller) describes the bike as smooth, enhancing the impression of its performance. @lubricator appreciates the color scheme, indicating it's visually appealing. Both @pix360 and @Zippy0002 (The Seller) highlight the quality of the bike, with @pix360 declaring it stunning and suggesting the winner of the auction will be thrilled, while @Zippy0002 (The Seller) confidently claims it's probably the best bike of its kind in the country.
Neutral: @Zippy0002 (The Seller) provides additional details about the bike, including the availability of the stock muffler and the fact that the bike can be shipped after purchase. The seller also mentions their background with motorcycles, having bought it from a long-time BMW aficionado's estate. Furthermore, @Zippy0002 (The Seller) clarifies that the screws noted by @strubes250 are actually mounts for the tank bag, which can be removed if desired, and confirms the bike comes with the tank bag but no additional bags for touring.
Negative: @strubes250 raises a concern regarding the screws sticking up from the filler cap, implying a potential issue related to the bike's appearance or usability. Additionally, @MrFeldman inquires about the touring bag mounts, expressing confusion over their presence without accompanying bags, which could indicate incomplete features of the bike that buyers expect to be included.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's unique features, particularly its good color, options, and rare sport seats, highlighting it as a valuable collector's item. @smacdiesel appreciates the low mileage, while @ralleyquattro declares it to have awesome options and expresses a desire for a limited-slip differential for perfection. @Oldnfast has had a long-standing desire for this model since 1986 and is particularly drawn to the seats. @FourRings also shares their sentiment about possibly trading their own vehicle for this particular car, emphasizing its appealing specs and colors. Others, like @jjonesx86 and @Nimbostratus, attest to the car's beauty and solid preservation, reflecting the confidence buyers can have in the car's condition and ownership history.
Neutral: Several comments seek clarification on specific vehicle features and previous maintenance history. @951Fanatic and @porsdrvr95 inquire about the replacement history of major components like the water pump and motor mounts, while also asking about the A/C system. @Borden raises a question about the condition of the interior, specifically regarding a burn mark on the seat. Meanwhile, @court314 provides insightful information regarding the car's option codes, offering knowledge about the limited-slip differential. The Seller, @DobsonStuttgart, responds to these inquiries with detailed information about previous maintenance and clarifies aspects of the car's condition, while sharing experiences of bringing the car to public events.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the car's price and some of its features. @hivetyrant mentions that the vehicle could be beyond their budget, indicating a potential barrier for interested buyers. @Borden's inquiry about the burn mark raises doubts about previous ownership experiences, like possible smoking, despite @DobsonStuttgart's reassurance of no lingering smoke smell. Similarly, @cozs questions whether the seats have been reupholstered, suggesting potential issues with authenticity. Overall, while most comments are positive, a few reflect hesitation based on financial and condition-related concerns.
![]() |
2005 Ford F-250 Super Duty Lariat Crew Cab Power Stroke 4×4 FX4
1FTSW21PX5EC59474
Lot 204067
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @Paschal described the vehicle as a "Nice unit," while @FordForJason expressed admiration, calling it "Such a good looking truck!" @Gabbrownie humorously suggested it could be a perfect post-divorce gift for @FordForJason. @som67 (The Seller) shared a personal story about the truck, highlighting its excellent condition and his positive experience of driving it on long trips. He emphasized that the truck was the cleanest he had seen, purchased from a dealership with a great track record, and has been well-maintained by its previous owner, a rancher in Montana.
Neutral: @som67 (The Seller) provided reassurance about the truck's gauge system, explaining that the coolant gauge works perfectly in use but may show inconsistencies during a warm-start video. He acknowledged @Fishhand's request for more information and offered details about the truck's maintenance history. He also communicated his willingness to assist the buyer in transportation, noting that the truck is ready with a full tank of diesel and new wipers for the next owner.
Negative: Concerns about the reliability of the vehicle's power stroke engine were voiced by @Ocis10, who expressed a lack of knowledge and raised questions about common issues with the 6.0 engine. While @som67 (The Seller) mentioned some potential upgrades for improved performance, it was clear that there are varying opinions on the engine's reliability. This uncertainty may leave some potential buyers apprehensive about making a purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Nismo_Native describes the vehicle as "a missile on four wheels," highlighting its impressive performance capabilities. @one daysomeday expresses admiration for the build, marveling at the potential of such a vehicle compared to iconic models like the MK4 Supra and R35 GTR, suggesting that it is an extraordinary machine that could command a high price. @GrandPrixMotors acknowledges the quality of the work done on the car, expressing intrigue about its functionality and streetability, indicating that it might be a blend of street and track performance, which resonates well with enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commentors seek more information about the vehicle's specifications and features. @Rporter110 inquires about the power output, while @Audipwr1 requests videos demonstrating the drivability of the car after tuning. The seller, @GrahamRahalPerformance, confirms that a dyno run video will be uploaded soon and mentions that the vehicle is street legal and registered in Indiana. @Lgear080 shows interest in a closer look at the vehicle's undercarriage to fully evaluate the build quality, suggesting a level of professionalism and concern for detailed performance.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the vehicle's practicality and potential issues. @westwd24 expresses skepticism about the dyno results and fears of an accident, hinting at the car’s possible excessive power for street use. @GrandPrixMotors questions the purpose of the build, noting that the parachute may imply a focus on high-speed events rather than street legality, and mentions their own experience with overly specialized builds, suggesting that the vehicle might be challenging to sell. @Audipwr1 also raises concerns about a leak in the trunk, which could suggest maintenance issues that need addressing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the beauty and condition of the Mach 1, with @tahoe007 calling it a "real beautiful" example and @funkaholik noting it as "handsome." @Bellski and @ArchSail appreciated the vehicle's classic features, with ArchSail wishing for better access to dry ice cleaning which they see adds to the car’s appeal. @RD1978TA commended the seller's presentation of the car and expressed a desire to own it, while @Old_Phart remarked positively on the quality of the paint for a twenty-year-old respray, indicating the car has been well-maintained. @frankgersten reminisced about his previous ownership of a similar model and showed a heartfelt connection to the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments focused on technical aspects and necessary maintenance for the Mach 1. @MartyKC clarified a confusion regarding the steering wheel design, while @Gopher428 shared insights into the costs of dry ice blasting, comparing it to alternative methods of cleaning the undercarriage. @Dymc751 questioned the functionality of the rim blow wheel, which @920auto confirmed was in good working order. Other users discussed the seemingly high appeal of the car design during its era with @Gopher428 pointing out issues with the Mach I rocker panels, reflecting on the design decisions made by Ford. @WannaStang and @Jimmyw1 raised questions about the car's audio quality and body condition, showing active interest in its operational features.
Negative: Concerns about potential issues with the vehicle were voiced, notably by @Wjbilbrey, who suggested that rust issues could indicate leaks in window seals which might need addressing. @CastellanMC and @Jimmyw1 inquired about possible signs of body filler or other blemishes, indicating that they were cautious about the car's overall integrity. Additionally, @WannaStang expressed curiosities about the car's idle quality which could imply performance concerns. Overall, while the comments reflected admiration, there were underlying queries about the vehicle's condition, hinting at the careful scrutiny levels applied by potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the Land Rover Defender 110, highlighting its unique and attractive design. @EggsBenny noted the vehicle's beauty, while @kcatx reminisced about dreaming of owning a Defender and described it as a high-end alternative to Jeeps and 4Runners. The versatility of the Defender was emphasized by @DM7, who explained that it accommodates urban overlanding and family needs, making it suitable for daily errands and adventures alike.
Neutral: The discussion included inquiries about the vehicle's automatic transmission choice. @WAGONBOYTD found the decision interesting, suggesting it might be for convenience given @DM7's location and lifestyle. @DM7 explained that the automatic feature was chosen for city driving, allowing the entire family to use the vehicle comfortably. @LeosKeys raised a question about the seating arrangement, specifically about the seatbelts available for passengers in the back.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's performance on highways and expressways. @WAGONBOYTD mentioned that an automatic transmission might not be ideal for merging and controlling the turbo, which could be a drawback for some drivers. This implies that while the Defender is suitable for urban use, it may face limitations in more demanding driving conditions, affecting some potential buyers' confidence in its highway capabilities.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @aegmotorsports has presented the 2013 Mercedes Benz W221 S550 as a stunning vehicle featuring Palladium Silver Metallic exterior and Ash interior with Burl Walnut Wood Trim. The car boasts impressive specifications including a 4.7L Twin Turbo V8 engine that delivers 429 hp and 516 lb-ft of torque, alongside numerous luxury features such as Keyless Entry, a rearview camera, and a Harman Kardon sound system. The seller has provided detailed information about the auction process, including the availability of extended warranty plans and shipping options.
Neutral: Commentators like @jamesc2022 and @bbuxton1 have engaged with specifications and features of the vehicle, asking relevant questions. @jamesc2022 pointed out a loud beep from the startup video and expressed curiosity about whether it could be disabled, while also acknowledging the car's good appearance and suitability for those seeking a sedan. @bbuxton1 inquired specifically about the original factory floor mats, indicating interest in additional details regarding the car's accessories and features.
Negative: Some comments, including one flagged as non-constructive from @BiStud, suggest a lack of engagement or understanding about the auction details or the vehicle itself. @jamesc2022's remarks about the beep seem to reflect a concern over an annoying feature, while overall sentiments appear mixed. The exchange indicates that potential buyers may have specific lingering questions, particularly regarding certain functionalities of the car that may affect their purchasing decision.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @HeavyTank77 expressed appreciation for the LR2's overall appearance, indicating it looks nice and encouraging others with a friendly GLWTA (Good Luck With The Auction). @projectstw complimented the vehicle, stating that it may be one of the nicest LR2s seen in many years. They emphasized the reliability of the vehicle, highlighting its 3.2 motor's durability with proper care and maintenance.
Neutral: @tkm90210 (The Seller) responded to queries from @puma2 regarding the lower door trim. The Seller provided reassurance about the vehicle's condition, describing it as normal and committed to addressing concerns with additional close-up photos for clarity. The Seller also engaged with @projectstw, expressing gratitude for their positive comments about the LR2.
Negative: @puma2 raised concerns about a possible misalignment of the lower door trim on the passenger side, suggesting that it protrudes and doesn't sit flush against the body. The dialogue continued with @puma2 seeking confirmation of the issue through photos, and while @tkm90210 (The Seller) acknowledged the concerns, there was an indication of a perceived disconnect in their assessment of the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commentors praised the condition of the vehicle, showcasing their admiration for the well-preserved nature of the motorcycle. @Knuckles-R-Busted reminisced about owning a similar model, emphasizing the fun associated with it. @bigKP expressed interest in the auction, stating they were eagerly watching the bids, while others like @bry593 highlighted Honda's reputation for quality with a remark on how Honda set the standard in motorcycle manufacturing. @onlyhonda4me remarked on the beauty of the bike and extended good luck wishes to the seller, reinforcing the positive sentiments surrounding the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: Various users sought clarification regarding the auction details and the vehicle's history. @mtw3194 raised questions about tire codes and title branding, indicating a desire for more information to inform their bidding decisions. The seller, @ah-hell, responded to inquiries concerning the motorcycle's mileage, stating that it is indeed accurate at 15,779 miles, alongside other general information about the bike's condition and background. Additionally, there were discussions about the bidder's experiences on the auction platform, emphasizing a shared understanding of the bidding process and etiquette.
Negative: Despite the overall positive aura, some comments hinted at potential concerns. @rocketjohnny and @Cudamem questioned the accuracy of the mileage and the condition of the gas tank, reflecting skepticism about the information shared. @mtw3194 and others worried about the tires due to their age, suggesting they might need replacing for serious riding, which could signify a hidden cost for future buyers. Some users expressed frustration regarding bid management and accuracy on the auction site, like @JeffreySilva's typo, indicating a distraction from the bidding process that could affect potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 highlighted the vehicle's beauty and craftsmanship, describing it as absolutely stunning and tasteful. They appreciate the incredible work done on transforming the F-100, treating it as a highly valuable classic truck. @RNash shared nostalgic memories of a similar truck from their childhood, emphasizing the special place these vehicles hold in their hearts. The sentiments around the truck are overwhelmingly positive, with mentions of admiration for its restoration and classic appearance.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a community of vehicle enthusiasts who appreciate the F-100's design and legacy. @1996MBZ noted that these old Ford trucks resonate with many, suggesting they will still fit into the automotive scene in the future. @emorsch praised the presentation of the truck while wishing the seller a successful sale, revealing a neutral but optimistic perspective about its appeal to potential buyers.
Negative: The only slightly critical mention came from @Mlongmike, who asked about the highest comfortable interstate driving speed for the vehicle, which could imply concerns about its performance on modern roadways. However, this comment does not detract significantly from the overall admiration expressed for the F-100.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @cpa713 praises the vehicle, noting it's another impressive offering from @BDAS, expressing excitement about its quality. @BDAS shares that the car was well-maintained as it was his wife’s daily driver for over 32,000 miles, claiming it is one of the nicest examples of the model available. The seller details extensive maintenance history, highlighting recent work on coolant systems, tires, and routine services that contribute to the car's excellent condition. Additionally, the seller emphasizes the vehicle's reliability for long road trips, mentioning a memorable journey that showcased its fuel efficiency.
Neutral: The seller provides thorough information about the vehicle's acquisition, noting that it was bought from the original owner, a doctor, who maintained it at a reputable dealership. The vehicle has all original paint with paint meter readings presented, and the seller mentions that it does not come with a tow hitch but could have one added if the new owner desires. Various inquiries from potential buyers, including questions about the CD player and rear seat sun shades, are met with informative responses from the seller.
Negative: Some comments indicate concern, such as @ProcrastiN8 questioning emissions status, which @BDAS addresses, confirming all emissions are intact. Another user, @Dheffel1, inquires whether the vehicle's sale will be through a dealership, which affects tax implications, to which the seller responds about its trade-in status. Additionally, @clemente102 expresses disappointment over the absence of rear seat sun shades, while @acravens queries about factory towing setups and finds it lacking a hitch, consistency indicating a few potential drawbacks to the car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bull-Taco described the vehicle as rare, indicating its uniqueness. @allienjack referred to it as a beauty, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @mlesko73 praised it as a beautiful example of Iacocca's vision, further emphasizing its status as a sporty 'secretary's car'. @93TOY echoed similar sentiments, appreciating the vehicle's beauty and simplicity, noting that it would be easy to maintain and repair. @PantherChicken mentioned its original features, indicating a degree of authenticity, and appreciated the attention to detail, such as the chrome bits and Tiffany Stripe.
Neutral: @Foxwogl reached out for communication regarding the vehicle, while @Rpharesjr provided a helpful tip on how to use @ tags to ensure proper contact between users. These comments suggest an active interest in the sale process without expressing strong opinions about the vehicle itself.
Negative: @k3omi raised a question about the authenticity of the vehicle, specifically whether it is a real Sprint, indicating a potential concern regarding its verification. This query introduces a note of skepticism about the vehicle's originality that contrasts with the otherwise positive assessments.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @DuBe (The Seller) expresses a deep appreciation for the 2002 Mercedes Benz SLK32 AMG, highlighting its fantastic performance and aesthetic appeal. He mentions that the car has been carefully maintained, with all known flaws addressed during his ownership. According to him, the vehicle runs exceptionally well, looks like new, and features a powerful 349hp Supercharged AMG engine that provides an exhilarating driving experience. Additionally, @carenthusiast2020 chimes in to reinforce the positive sentiment, stating that the car is stunning in person and a tremendous amount of fun, echoing the excitement associated with this model.
Neutral: @DuBe (The Seller) provides detailed information regarding the car's history, including its garage location and the fact that it was purchased from a dealer in Silicon Valley. He mentions that he lacks information about previous owners but reassures potential buyers that no major concerns exist regarding the vehicle's current state. He also notes that some minor touch-ups have been made on the exterior due to rock chips and highlights the reconditioning effort on the center console, asserting it has been restored to eliminate previous cosmetic issues.
Negative: @DuBe (The Seller) mentions that a small area next to the ignition key on the center console has been repaired with glue due to vinyl separation, which might raise concerns for buyers regarding cosmetic imperfections. While he assures potential buyers that the overall exterior is free from dents and the paint is in good condition, the presence of paint pen touch-ups and previous factory paint defects may be seen as drawbacks. Overall, there is an implication of limited information regarding the vehicle's past, which might leave some buyers hesitant.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @carsbydusotti highlights the uniqueness of the vehicle, noting that it's thrilling to see an F-body convertible equipped with a supercharger and a 6-speed transmission, which adds to the driving excitement. @aitalam shares a nostalgic perspective about F-body vehicles, describing them as underrated yet capable of delivering a refined muscle car experience. They express confidence that the new owner will enjoy the car, emphasizing the fun of driving it actively and engaging with its performance.
Neutral: @Reconjr (The Seller) provides useful information in response to inquiries, sharing that the car has no catalytic converters and confirming there are no engine lights present. The seller also assures potential buyers that the fuel gauge reads correctly and vows to produce a video demonstrating the vehicle's convertible top operation. There is a balanced clarification of past damage reported in 2003, without diving deep into its implications for the car's current condition.
Negative: @Group-AWheels raises concerns about the absence of catalytic converters, querying whether this affects emissions and functionality. @dorinndig points out potential misalignment in the car's front appearance, which raises doubts about its exterior condition, while @70GTO455HO questions the absence of a missing door bar, implying there may be incomplete components affecting the vehicle's integrity. These comments suggest some scrutiny around the vehicle's condition and functionality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters generally express excitement about the vehicle, one describing it as an 'absolute badass.' There is a strong interest in its heavy-duty capabilities, with multiple requests for specifications like horsepower and torque. The seller, @RR_Raleigh, actively engages with potential buyers, providing information about the motor and encouraging inquiries, which adds to a positive atmosphere surrounding the auction.
Neutral: Some comments seek clarification on the vehicle's features, particularly its supposed bullet-resistance. @fds19355 asks if the glass or body panels are bullet resistant, highlighting uncertainty about the vehicle's capabilities. The seller responds carefully, indicating that they cannot make unverified claims about the vehicle's resistance to firearms, but acknowledges that it has a ballistic package, further emphasizing the importance of clear communication about such features.
Negative: A few comments express skepticism regarding the vehicle's bulletproof claims, questioning whether it can withstand small arms fire in real scenarios. @PWSchuh notes that the auction details do not explicitly mention bulletproof attributes, creating doubt about the robustness of the vehicle. The discussions imply a need for more definitive information on the vehicle's specifications and features to satisfy potential bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle are overwhelmingly positive, with many users expressing admiration for its design and overall beauty. Notably, @pat.bmw described it as a stunning car, while @Tripledigit praised it as one of the best automotive designs over the last 30 years, emphasizing its timeless appeal. @simpsoap echoed this sentiment, claiming it is simply gorgeous and admitting to frequent visits to admire it. The seller, @silverarrowcarsltd, also affirmed its aesthetic value by agreeing it is among the best-looking Bentleys ever made.
Neutral: Some comments reflect neutral observations or inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifications. For instance, @Stark007 asked about any paint work on the car, to which @silverarrowcarsltd responded, explaining that while the paint is fabulous, it was hand painted with some inconsistency. Meanwhile, @Jakespeeds posed a question about the implications of the car's Montana title concerning California emissions regulations, showing an interest without expressing a strong opinion.
Negative: On the less positive side, comments reflect the frustrations and realities of affordability. For example, @SaintBud expressed a longing for the Bentley Continental SC but lamented being too poor to own such a prized vehicle. Additionally, @OceanLad humorously commented on the car's projected value trajectory, insinuating the improbability of affording it in the near future, humorously suggesting they might only manage to own it in 2360. This highlights a common theme among commenters who wish for the vehicle but feel it's out of their reach.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors express admiration for the vehicle, noting its beauty and classic appeal. @Dollycat3 describes it as a "wonderful beauty," while @jwcunningham65 calls the paint color "spectacular." @TJClassic points out that not all 1959 Cadillacs were convertibles, celebrating the sedan’s representation of that era. @Undatakr appreciates the preservation of the old car's charm, despite mentioning the presence of air fresheners. Additionally, @Joeyangui (The Seller) shares that the car drives excellently with no rust underneath and promises a new windshield and dashboard, among other updates.
Neutral: Comments reflect curiosity and a desire for more information about the vehicle. @neilpierson25 comments on the unexpected reserve price, indicating a perception that the owner might want to sell quickly. Several requests for additional information come from @bobsinhawaii, who asks for pictures of the VIN stamped into the frame, a driving video, and details about a cracked windshield. @63impalaboy provides context regarding Cadillac's market strategy during the era, mentioning Cadillac's range of models and their appeal to different customer bases without expressing a strong opinion about the vehicle itself.
Negative: Some comments highlight perceived negatives about the vehicle's features and condition. @Broovy criticizes the presence of crank windows, suggesting it's inappropriate for a Cadillac of that era. @Thunderpony raises concerns about potential bullet holes in the wing vents, questioning the vehicle's condition and history. The discussion surrounding the vehicle has mixed feelings, from aesthetic appreciation to concerns about functionality and overall presentation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the 1950 Riley RMD Drophead Coupe, noting it as a unique and high-quality vehicle. @tim_t highlighted the excellent engineering and craftsmanship of the RM series, describing them as 'true engineering gems' and appreciating the car's historical value as a coachbuilt vehicle. @jimreillyjmr also praised the aesthetics and functionality of the car, commenting on its classy appearance and the enjoyable driving experience it offers, while @johnw reminisced positively about their own Riley experience, emphasizing the car's reliability and superior engine performance.
Neutral: Comments related to the vehicle's VIN and production details indicated clarity on how the car was titled and assigned its VIN, with @tleitzell97 explaining that while VINs were not mandatory during the production period, the vehicle was legally titled as an antique with the VIN 'RIL600850'. Other commenters, such as @speedforreal and @insterling1, provided insights into the manufacturing and historical context of the Riley, discussing the car's targeted market and production methods. Discussion about the vehicle's mechanical adjustments and fit also appeared, with @mibenthal inquiring about steering column adjustments and @insterling1 confirming its limited adjustability.
Negative: A few comments pointed to concerns surrounding the vehicle's fit for larger individuals, with @mibenthal sharing experiences of cramped space between the seat and steering wheel, particularly for someone of their height. Additionally, @TR250Tom commented on the economic outlook affecting potential buyers, suggesting that the current market might not favor high bids for such vehicles compared to previous years, implying concern over the perceived value of the car in the present context.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 1995 Ferrari 456 GT 6-Speed, highlighting its unique features and desirability. @VBAutosport mentioned the car's exceptional provenance, being previously owned by famed custom car builder Boyd Coddington, which adds to its allure. @alfriedesq praised the rare manual transmission, while @AJL1988 recognized the car’s connection to Ferrari’s grand touring excellence. @theforce88 simply described it as a beautiful car and wished the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: Several users engaged with the seller to ask details about the vehicle's condition and service history. @Porsche911forever brought up concerns regarding known issues with windows in similar models and questioned the timing belt's replacement history, leading to a response from @VBAutosport confirming there had been no reported issues with the windows. Other comments included inquiries about the car’s mechanical performance, driving video footages, and the overall market significance of the auction, as highlighted by @Tobyallen and @malcoll.
Negative: However, there were some reservations noted by commenters regarding the car's condition. @malcoll questioned Boyd Coddington's influence on the car's value, while @SuretyAgent raised concerns after noticing difficulties with shifting into second gear during a drive video. @Porsche911forever pointed out the risk associated with the timing belt being overdue for replacement, suggesting the need for further clarity from the seller about maintenance records. This mix of concerns suggests that while the car is highly regarded, potential buyers remain cautious about some of its mechanical aspects.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @VTNB finds the vehicle to be quite impressive, noting it as "So cool!" @TGLewis also shares enthusiasm, remarking on the prevalence of the CB400F, describing it as a "Beautiful machine" and wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @Wentlandt expresses being "genuinely speechless" about the bike's beauty, and @MotorWerks911 compliments the bike's appearance while inquiring about the functionality of its starting options. @RebelwoaCloo admires the bike as well, expressing a strong desire to ride it after bidding.
Neutral: @RelicWerke (The Seller) provides valuable context about the bike. They mention that it is one of their retirement projects and detail their engineering background, emphasizing quality and attention to detail. The seller confirms that both the kick starter and electric starter work, addressing a question raised by @MotorWerks911. Furthermore, the seller shares accolades the bike has received, including winning multiple awards and being showcased in an art exhibit.
Negative: @ExCoalMiner raises a concern regarding the instruments on the bike, specifically mentioning inaccuracies with the tachometer and speedometer in relation to the year of the model. They seek clarification on this issue, to which @RelicWerke (The Seller) responds, stating that the gauges were present at the time of purchase and are functioning as intended.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @shelbyhertz2006 expressed love for the vehicle's color, indicating that it's a standout feature. @AJL1988 reinforced this sentiment by stating that the car's color is the only one they would consider if purchasing that generation of T-Bird. @Moonglow praised the car, describing it as beautiful and noting that the 007 edition is the best of the last generation T-Birds, also wishing the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: @bandit2025 and @RTH5555 asked specific questions about maintenance and condition, inquiring whether all coil packs and valve cover gaskets have been replaced, and whether the car has ever been smoked in. @PMK409 asked for videos of the hardtop operation and chassis shots, while @JR60 questioned the number of owners over the mileage. @Moonglow responded that having three owners over 22 years is not excessive, where many owners treat the vehicle as a special occasion car.
Negative: @dyoder289 pointed out potential red flags by noting red overspray on the rear undercarriage and questioning if the car had been recently repainted. @meg288234 asked whether the back bumper has been repainted, implying concerns about the vehicle's condition. @ltsrunm (The Seller) had to clarify that there has been no paint work since his father owned the car, and addressed other concerns, including interior odors and gasket replacements.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters like @Boyhowdee appreciate the vehicle's aesthetic at 190k miles, noting the authenticity of the underhood and undercarriage as shown in an 'as-found' condition. @JCW-S1232 even goes so far as to call the final year of the model the 'best of breed', highlighting that many of these cars surpass 200K miles in excellent running condition. The seller, @wavedhome, expresses a genuine love for the car, detailing the significant work already completed, such as the replacement of major systems during the engine rebuild, thereby assuring potential buyers that the vehicle has been well-maintained and dependable.
Neutral: There are discussions regarding the oil leak, with @fosteram27 seeking clarity on its source and severity. @Rob383 shares insights from personal experience, suggesting the oil filter housing could be a common leak point and underlining the anticipated repair costs. The seller, @wavedhome, confirms that the source of the leak has been investigated, revealing it to be primarily from the drain plug, with an additional leak manageable through repair.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the vehicle needing further attention, as both @fosteram27 and @ryan2115 mention upcoming maintenance needs such as shocks and upholstery. @wavedhome acknowledges that while the car is currently drivable and has undergone extensive repairs, it still requires a paint job due to the poor condition of the clearcoat. Moreover, the seller expresses feeling proud of the car's longevity but admits that it may not be suited for those who aren’t enthusiastic about DIY repairs, suggesting mixed sentiments about its future ownership.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @UNGN expresses enthusiasm for their 1986 GT convertible, highlighting its instant torque and impressive fuel economy of 26 mpg, which stood out compared to older classic muscle cars they previously owned. They praise the vehicle's durability, mentioning that it provided 66,000 trouble-free miles before they traded it in, with only minimal warranty work needed. @DW66 shares a similar sentiment, recalling their own experience with the fast and fun car, lamenting having sold it and noting the rarity of T Tops.
Neutral: @DylanPip, the seller, responds to comments concerning the vehicle's sales history, indicating that a potential buyer backed out after a sale was arranged, leading to the car being relisted. @dmose notes the vehicle's recent activity on various auction platforms like Mecum Glendale and Cars & Bids, confirming they will try to bid on it again. @DylanPip acknowledges the multiple listings and previous interest, emphasizing the car's quality and cleanliness.
Negative: @Tboston87 raises a concern regarding a discrepancy in the vehicle's history by questioning why the Carfax mileage is significantly higher than what is displayed on the odometer. This raises potential red flags for prospective buyers regarding the vehicle's true condition and reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Beans_Bacon describes the truck as a beautiful squarebody, expressing enthusiasm and well wishes for the auction. The overall sentiment from bidders and onlookers appears to be positive as they appreciate the style and design of the 1982 C10 shortbed being auctioned. It seems that there is an excitement around the vehicle, which reflects in the encouragement and compliments offered by participants.
Neutral: @Natvson (The Seller) clarifies details about the truck's condition and history, emphasizing the practicality and reliability of the build. They mention thoughtful enhancements made to the C10 that prioritize functionality over extreme performance modifications. The seller also invites questions and interacts with potential bidders, indicating an open and communicative auction environment.
Negative: A downside mentioned by @Natvson is that there will not be a burnout video available as requested by @Beans_Bacon. This lack of certain desired visuals may disappoint some potential bidders who seek dynamic demonstrations of the vehicle's capabilities. Additionally, @Natvson mentions that there are a few components left to be finished, such as interior and exterior trim, which may lead some to consider the additional work needed to fully complete the truck.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @urgetodrive appreciates the inclusion of the extremely hard-to-find OEM wind deflector, indicating its value in the market. @CardiffClassics, the seller, highlights that the car features a Dinan package, which includes a Stainless Steel Exhaust, an upgraded computer chip, and other performance enhancements, giving it a V-8 feel while driving. The seller emphasizes the vehicle's maintenance history, noting it has been serviced every 2,000 miles and has an extended warranty as a certified pre-owned vehicle, which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: @MCLeather expresses curiosity about the Dinan parts included in the vehicle, sparking an informative exchange regarding the car's specifications, particularly the suspension which the seller mentions they are currently researching. @TracksuitAL contributes by clarifying that the S package primarily includes a strut brace and a modification to the automatic transmission software without significant suspension upgrades.
Negative: @Kkuty raises concerns regarding the engine's health, asking about potential leaks or compression issues. The seller, @CardiffClassics, addresses these concerns by assuring that the engine is in excellent condition with no leaks or known issues, though the initial inquiry reflects a level of skepticism regarding the vehicle's maintenance claims. Overall, the interaction indicates a potential buyer's cautious approach towards the vehicle's underlying mechanics.
![]() |
19×7.5″ and 19×10″ Speedline Wheels for Ferrari
Four Speedline Wheels For Ferrari
Lot 204091
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @DOWORK1 mentioned that they have these wheels on their F430 and described them as stunning. @M458 praised the clarity of the fitment information provided by the seller and expressed disbelief at the number of inquiries about fitment for other car models, emphasizing the great deal these wheels represent for Ferrari owners. They highlighted the importance of keeping the stock wheels for future use or resale, suggesting that others should consider this option.
Neutral: @MidwestEuroParts provided detailed information about the fitment of the wheels, confirming that they fit the Ferrari 360 Modena Coupe as requested by @DonCar. They also clarified that the wheels were previously mounted with tires, responding to @joesailor's inquiry. Additionally, the seller outlined the shipping costs and handling procedures for potential buyers in the listing, along with local pickup options.
Negative: @onlyhonda4me humorously questioned whether the wheels would fit their Civic, suggesting a lack of seriousness regarding the fitment for non-Ferrari models. @Shawh expressed some confusion about whether the wheels could fit a 1995 348, indicating that there may still be uncertainty for buyers regarding compatibility. Overall, a few comments reflected skepticism over understanding the specifics of the listing, which could deter potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Rich_Truett expressed admiration for the bike's fantastic patina, appreciating its wear and tear that makes it less of a museum piece and more of a rideable classic, suggesting that its imperfect restoration adds to its character. @Gearheadaddy also praised the sprung hub design based on extensive personal experience with Triumph motorcycles, indicating a positive recognition of its engineering despite the challenges associated with it. Additionally, @jbruns64 acknowledged that the bike has many redeeming qualities, including the notable sprung rear hub and the original SU carburetor, which contribute positively to its appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @PlayTheRush, responded to several inquiries, confirming that the rear hub is in good condition and that the bike's electrical components are functioning properly. They also clarified details regarding the bike's title and VIN, indicating a willingness to provide additional information upon request. Furthermore, comments from users like @inyomatt and @masterofnon posed thoughtful questions about the bike's operational aspects and title verification procedures, highlighting a neutral standpoint focused on gathering necessary information about the motorcycle's condition and history.
Negative: @halcyonmotors pointed out a potential oversight in the bike's description regarding the rear suspension travel and suggested that the seller clarify these details. @OilChanger noted the risks associated with the sprung hub design, mentioning common issues it may face and the difficulty of finding replacement parts. @masterofnon raised concerns regarding frame and engine number verification for the title transfer process, indicating potential complications that could negatively impact the bike's transaction and ownership clarity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @No_Substitute commented that it is a beautiful car, and @bb4spd (The Seller) shared restoration updates, detailing efforts such as a thorough under hood cleanup, dash and seatbelt restoration, and improvements to chrome and bright work, all of which were positively acknowledged by potential buyers. Furthermore, @bb4spd noted the successful conversion of the AC compressor to 134A, showing commitment to maintaining the vehicle's comfort features.
Neutral: @MarkMontana showed curiosity regarding the leather seats and whether new foam was installed, while also checking about the original steering wheel. After reviewing information, he acknowledged that the leather was indeed factory-installed. @Gistus1972 was also curious if the evaporator valve was the sole issue preventing the AC from working efficiently and confirmed with @bb4spd that this was the case, a detail that further clarified potential issues for interested buyers.
Negative: @bb4spd indicated that the AC system is not currently operational due to the need for replacing the evaporator valve and confirmed that the original steering wheel is not available, which could be viewed as a drawback for some buyers. Additionally, while efforts were made toward restoring various aspects of the car, some potential buyers, like @corvettom9, raised concerns about the interior trim maintenance, suggesting that there might still be some area left for improvement.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @56PackardMan describes the vehicle as a "hot rod spec luxury car," indicating a layer of excitement and high regard for the car's performance and luxurious features. @Raffi, the seller, presents the vehicle as a remarkable Mercedes-Benz AMG S63 highlighting its premium options and impressive performance. @Raffi also assures potential buyers of the reliability of the car, noting it has had two owners and has always been dealer serviced, enhancing its appeal to bidders.
Neutral: @Raffi provides a welcoming message to viewers and potential bidders on the auction platform, stating that he is available for questions and offers assistance with transport arrangements. He mentions short-term storage options after purchase, which may be pertinent to some bidders considering logistics following the acquisition of the vehicle. Such information establishes a business-friendly relationship and readiness to facilitate a smooth purchasing experience.
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @BDurr notes that it is a nice bike and highlights that it is a very early production example. @robbybob, the seller, acknowledges the bike is being sold because it has seen so little use, citing a long history of bike ownership and a preference for riding newer models, which they also enjoy. This acknowledgment gives potential buyers an insight into the seller's reasoning and passion for motorcycling.
Neutral: @saddlesore raises a curiosity about the low mileage of just 252 miles over 9 years, implying it may be unusual. @eskothomson echoes this concern by questioning why so few miles have been put on the bike, asking if the seller simply never had the time to ride it. @robbybob clarifies that he primarily used this bike for short commutes rather than longer rides.
Negative: @bobrk expresses concern about the headlight being misaligned, suggesting that the 'H4' in the middle of the lens should be positioned straight up and down. He also questions the presence of a picture showing a license plate from another bike, implying there could be issues regarding the bike's documentation or authenticity. @robbybob responds by admitting that he hadn't taken the plate off, indicating some oversight on his part.
![]() |
Single-Family-Owned 2004 Ford Excursion Eddie Bauer Power Stroke 4×4
1FMSU45PX4EA00313
Lot 204109
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @Idahoredfish (The Seller) confidently assures that there have never been any issues with the EGR or the coolant, indicating a well-maintained vehicle. This assurance is valuable for potential buyers looking for reliability in such mechanical aspects.
Neutral: @WrenchinAndDrivin expresses appreciation for the service records provided and inquires about the functionality of the AC and the overall solid nature of the vehicle despite noted rust. They also ask about its capability as a daily driver and its towing capacity, suggesting a practical interest in the vehicle's performance.
Negative: @Chriszark raises concerns by questioning any previous work done on the EGR and if there have been any coolant issues, implying potential past problems that may need addressing. This highlights the need for due diligence regarding the vehicle's history and condition.
![]() |
39-Years-Owned, L20B-Powered 1972 Datsun 510 2-Door Sedan 4-Speed Race Car
PL510337426
Lot 204110
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @davidb72 remarks that the car is great looking, and @PDXBryan praises the sweet race 510 build, complimenting its original BRE-type fender flare treatments and wheels. @groceg also admires the "old school" Libre wheels and the overall design, stating it's a well done racer that likely performs incredibly well. @FloridaManNeedsTrailer expresses enthusiasm about the car, suggesting it has a great ownership story behind it, reinforcing its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: @TFitzs (The Seller) clarifies various questions, noting that the car has not been to Summit Point and last raced in 2012, but was on track just a month ago for testing. @M3_Driver inquires about the car's power output and weight, to which @TFitzs responds that the car weighs about 1,900 lbs but hasn't been dyno'd, and mentions needing a new harness, an oil cooler, and some tuning to optimize performance. The seller provides recent lap times from different tracks, indicating a competitive track record.
Negative: Some comments highlight uncertainties around the car's specifications. @Profcarnut points out a possible inconsistency in the date related to the car's last track appearance, wondering if it is a typo. Additionally, @Rhenthalin questions the suitability of the car's seating for different sizes of passengers. There are also concerns about the condition of the older tires that need replacement, pointing out that they might not perform well despite being relatively unused.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the vehicle's potential as a solid platform for a momentum track car, with @RecoveringAtty noting it needs to be driven more. The seller, @philios123, mentions that the car passed inspection after some work in 2021 and sees no reason it wouldn't pass inspection now. There's also mention of a color-matched paint pen included with the sale, which enhances the appeal for potential buyers.
Neutral: The seller, @philios123, responds to inquiries regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, stating the last major service occurred in 2018, which included a timing belt change. They mention the car has been minimally driven since then, leading to questions about its current condition and whether it has any fluid leaks. Comments show curiosity about the vehicle's inspection status and the working condition of the A/C and heater, with @RecoveringAtty praising the A/C functionality of the 944 compared to older models.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the vehicle's bumper alignment, with @Spokayman pointing out that it appears crooked, indicating a possible minor collision. The seller acknowledges this and indicates it could be an easily correctable issue, although it suggests a need for repair. Further negative points are raised about the expired PA inspection and queries regarding the reliability of various components such as the rear hatch and sunroof operation, with potential mechanical issues hinted at in the discussion.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @JGraham highlighted several strengths of the vehicle, noting its euro spec, nutria interior, and the powerful 3.5 engine. They referenced that these features weren't available in the U.S. until 1985, showcasing the car's uniqueness. @BloodyHell also commended the extensive work done on the car, emphasizing the owner's attention to detail in maintenance, such as the replacement of small components like headlight bulbs, and expressed optimism that the vehicle only needed some minor repairs to reach its full potential.
Neutral: @bhs0904, the seller, explained the circumstances around the car's minor accident, mentioning that it had been parked on the street for six months before being auctioned off. They also provided detailed information about the vehicle's history, including the previous owner and repair efforts made over the years, indicating that while the car has its issues, it has been well-maintained and could be restored given its value at a relatively low cost.
Negative: A few concerns were raised by @e9er, who expressed confusion over the decision not to fix the car before listing it and questioned the inclusion of a reserve. @JGraham criticized the minor damage to the rear quarter panel, asserting that despite the damage being labeled as 'minor,' the cost to repair would be significant. @e9er emphasized that if it were their vehicle, they would have repaired it using insurance funds, reflecting a skepticism about the vehicle's overall presentation given the reported accident.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the stunning aesthetics and unique color of the vehicle, with @Mercury88 calling it a 'beautiful color' and @neverenoughgold describing 'Midnight Blue' as 'stunning'. @djimbe appreciates the design, noting that the Continental carries a special allure even amid the era's other luxury vehicles. @robert.noble emphasizes the comfort and presence of the Mark V, while @pmirp1 captures the vehicle’s essence, calling it 'American beauty and elegance at its absolute BEST'. @allhart18 mentions that the Mark V is underrated, with driving experiences exceeding expectations, clearly reflecting a strong admiration for its luxury and performance.
Neutral: Several comments express curiosity and interest in the vehicle's features and history. @AnnOnymous asks about various aspects, including the sunroof, clock condition, and any cosmetic issues, illustrating a careful consideration of the car's details. @Today raises questions about possible paint bubbles and the car's history due to lack of registration for the past ten years, seeking deeper knowledge about its condition. @Wastingincome also inquires about the repaint, the quality of the ceramic coating, and the cleanliness of the undercarriage. @Pirate60 and @Riviera70 similarly seek clarification on title transfer conditions and possible overspray from the repaint, demonstrating an engagement with the purchasing process.
Negative: Some comments express concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and modifications. @Wastingincome specifically points out a concern regarding bubbling paint and asks about its extent and history of use. @Today shares similar concerns about the bubbling, indicating apprehension before making a commitment. @RJAPPRAISE and @Wastingincome question details in the car's listing, hinting at potential discrepancies or mistakes in the description. The mention of its age and previous registration raises doubts about the vehicle’s overall upkeep in the last decade, which might deter potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @dpnobile (The Seller) expresses excitement about the 1989 Porsche 928 S4, highlighting its clean engine and solid performance on the road. The car has been well-maintained, featuring a complete engine rebuild, a replaced transmission, and a history of resolved electrical issues. Several commenters, like @Conw5254 and @BigSwole, appreciate the original intake manifold finish and the car's color, noting its overall quality. There’s a sense of nostalgia and admiration for the 928, with several commenters indicating their love for the model and its potential for value appreciation.
Neutral: Commenters like @sunvalley and @WizardKing1023 provide a balanced outlook on owning a vintage Porsche, discussing the common challenges that come with it, such as aging wiring and ECU issues. They also ask practical questions regarding the sunroof, transmission performance, and AC functionality, receiving helpful responses from @dpnobile (The Seller) which affirm the car's features are operational. Overall, the comments reflect a blend of enthusiasm and caution regarding the responsibilities of maintaining an older vehicle.
Negative: Some comments point out areas of concern, such as @bhempfli's query about the car's beige color choice and @linderpat's request for more photos to satisfy potential bidders. @sunvalley further inquires about possible transmission sluggishness and the AC system, implying that there are elements that need assurance. There's an underlying concern among some commenters regarding the complexities of maintaining a vintage 928, evidenced by @sunvalley noting the investment required for proper upkeep and the need for deeper pockets.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Noisyboyz praises the beautiful car, noting the appealing color-coordinated dash and door panels of the 3LT option. @GT35065 and @1click2many highlight the car's great looks and driving performance, comparing it favorably to European supercars at a lower cost. @DONUTFORME shares a personal affirmation of the C8's driving enjoyment, while @SSmith2020 expresses admiration for the car and indicates genuine interest in making a purchase, suggesting confidence in its overall condition and value.
Neutral: @stevewindom, who has owned the car, provides details about its condition, mentioning that the engine bay and underbody are sealed, but he will work on providing additional photos for potential buyers. @WFK1856 (The Seller) adds that more images with the top down are available. @CaptJack22 and @doorite1 are involved in verifying service records, indicating the car has had maintenance like oil changes without significant wear, although exact service history is more limited, but available upon request.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns regarding minor blemishes and service details. @audiosDinero asks about scratches on the front nose, and @Fasted60 criticizes the tan interior. @Red99's inquiries about photos of the engine bay and underbody reflect a desire for transparency that signals some potential buyer hesitance. Overall, while the car garners a lot of positive attention, queries about its condition and specifications reveal some skepticism that could affect buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters generally express a positive sentiment about the van, noting its appealing qualities, such as its nice appearance. @Bigboy755, the seller, maintains a welcoming and informative attitude, responding promptly to inquiries and providing details about the engine type and functionality. @1996Sambar appreciates the confirmation that everything is working well and highlights the absence of odors, indicating confidence in the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Several commenters are seeking additional information to better understand the vehicle's specifications and features. @Greasedog inquires about the exact engine type and its variations, while @TLC470 requests more photos of the front bumper. @mrshmllwhl also asks for roof photos and maintenance history, showing a balanced interest in assessing the van further. @baltimore1 shows a neutral stance by inquiring about documentation and titling requirements, reflecting the practical considerations involved in buying a vehicle.
Negative: There are no explicitly negative comments regarding the van or the seller. However, some questions indicate uncertainty among potential buyers. @IndyCat raises a point about the fuel injection system, suggesting a possible misunderstanding about the van's specifications, which could reflect hesitation on the part of buyers to fully trust the provided information without further clarification.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as very handsome and compliments its build, expressing a friendly sentiment with thumbs up emojis. @BlackBarracuda also gives a positive note, calling it a 'sweet rig' and asks specific questions about the fuel capacity and original wheels, showing interest in the vehicle's features.
Neutral: @Ignoramoose inquires about the service history, noting the vehicle looks clean and pictures show no concerning issues. The comment indicates that while the CTIS system is not connected to the aftermarket rims, this is not unusual and further service history would be valuable.
Negative: @dYr (The Seller) admits to not having service records but mentions recent maintenance done on the vehicle. While this may raise concerns for some potential buyers, it is countered by the lack of major issues seen in the pictures. Another comment from @ArmedAviator suggests potential hesitation, as they seek further engagement regarding an in-person inspection.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Super7Driver enjoys seeing the Italian car in British Racing Green, stating it looks great. @RiffRaff describes the vehicle as a nice example that provides a sublime driving experience, praising its beauty and encouraging good luck with the sale. @Jockr also admires the color and considers it a nice example, while @Watry highlights the car's good maintenance history and the quality of its paint job, noting how it has been well-kept over the years, especially under the care of a reputable mechanic.
Neutral: @AvidMarxist imagines this vehicle would fit well next to their 73 Verde Pino Spider without a strong opinion. @laserguru requests additional photos of critical areas like the floor pans and other spots prone to corrosion, showing a concern for the vehicle's condition while remaining neutral. @AutoPazzo and @lyledee both inquire about forthcoming driving and cold start videos, looking for more detailed information about the car's performance and functionality.
Negative: @vrover_356 questions the state of the 23-year-old tires, suggesting they might be a concern. @OneAlfaShort raises a worry regarding the lack of visible oil drops under the car, indicating possible issues. @lyledee seems skeptical about getting a cold start or driving video and expresses concern for a car utilizing SPICA, insinuating that the lack of further evidence might be a red flag. Lastly, @tomcap comments on the vehicle's previous auction price, hinting that it may have a long way to go to reach its perceived value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as a 'rambunctious red Bronco' and praises it as a 'bodacious build,' showing enthusiasm with positive emojis. @Muddy2014, the seller, expresses appreciation for the positive comments, indicating that the overall reception of the vehicle is favorable. Additionally, @Muddy2014 highlights that the frame stretch enhances the vehicle's off-road capabilities and stability, which is a strong selling point for potential buyers.
Neutral: @dhonthehill inquires about the frame stretch, seeking clarification on the vehicle's capabilities and design changes. @Muddy2014 responds with detailed explanations that the frame was stretched 12 inches while keeping the body intact, showing transparency in the modifications made. The seller provides thorough clarifications about the construction details, which suggest a high level of craftsmanship and attention to the vehicle's performance.
Negative: No negative comments regarding the vehicle were found in the provided comments. All discussions remained positive and constructive, focusing on the vehicle's capabilities and modifications without expressing any dissatisfaction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle. @z0e_moto described it as 'bellisimo' and expressed being in love with the bike. @Ohdannyboy noted the fierce look of the matte black finish, emphasizing its aesthetic appeal. @sjkeller75 (The Seller) shared fond memories of owning the bike since new in 2006, highlighting the enjoyment it has provided and the aftermarket modifications that enhance its performance and appearance. The seller seems genuinely enthusiastic about the bike's capabilities and hopes the new owner will enjoy it as much as they have.
Neutral: Several questions were raised regarding the bike's condition and specifics. @BonzoM inquired about the loose controls, whether the bike comes with full service records, and if there is any swelling in the tank, or if it has ever been tracked or dropped. The seller addressed these concerns directly, explaining the condition of the left side control pod and confirming that there is no tank swelling and only one track day noted in the bike's history. @holdencx asked about the original keyed gas cap, to which the seller responded that it is no longer available, showing the practical aspect of the selling process.
Negative: Some comments reflected frustration, particularly regarding the additional costs associated with the purchase. @RickonaDeuce expressed annoyance over the $2,255.63 shipping fee, which indicates potential concerns about unforeseen expenses in the buying process. This comment reveals that while there is significant interest in the bike, there are also practical considerations that might detract from the overall experience of potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @onedaysomeday appreciates the vehicle's consistent patina and suggests driving it as is, highlighting its appeal. @JIMMY compares the car to the Batmobile's big sister, showing enthusiasm for its design. @mailer_daemon finds the car beautiful and envisions it with a cleaned-up engine bay and interior while keeping the exterior intact. @Dollycat3 calls it a wonderful original Amethyst beauty, especially loving the interior design. @Sparrownaut compliments the colors of the 1956 model, indicating it only needs a bit more of them. @shervinator expresses admiration despite budget constraints, and @SilverFox10 describes it as hauntingly attractive.
Neutral: Comments from @Apollofarmcars (The Seller) provide detailed information about the vehicle's condition and its complete parts inventory. @Sheffieldsilver requests more images and explanations about the extra parts, indicating some interest but seeking clarity. @tsdrg71 inquires about the vehicle's location for viewing, while @emmy604 asks if the smoking issues have been resolved, to which the seller clarifies there is no smoke. @kjreh inquires about additional services needed for use, prompting seller responses detailing necessary installations and maintenance.
Negative: Some concerns arise from @Sheffieldsilver regarding the lack of clarity about the extra parts associated with the vehicle, leading to requests for more information. @kjreh questions the need for additional services, showing uncertainty about the car's readiness. Overall, while there is much enthusiasm, some comments reflect a need for further details and reassurance about the vehicle's condition, functionality, and upkeep needs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the well-maintained condition and visual appeal of the vehicle, including @KevsHondas who admires the extensive maintenance work done, making it ready for years of future use. @Jimmyblues1959 reminisces about his own experiences with similar models, stating how well-sorted the car appears given its mileage. @hobbsm3 (The Seller) shares the effort and time invested in revamping the car, confidently expressing that it is turnkey ready for the next owner. @dandoe expresses nostalgia, remarking on how great the car looks. Overall, the vehicle is praised for its aesthetics and the care it has received.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle also include inquiries regarding specific features and conditions, such as @parealtor asking about the front lower lip and @oklahomie questioning whether the air conditioning system is still using R-12 or has been converted. @QuattroDavid requests clarification about details mentioned in the auction listing, specifically about the 'VIN certification waved' note and additional wheels or air dams, indicating an interest in more information. There are also nostalgic references from users sharing memories of owning or working on similar models, underscoring the car's significance to enthusiasts without direct commentary on its condition.
Negative: Some critical observations have been made concerning the vehicle's details, particularly from @EyePapi, who points out that the car is improperly fitted with directional wheels, a detail confirmed by @ED_C, adding a light-hearted comment about @George94tt's sliding abilities in his own vehicle. This suggests a potential oversight in the car’s current setup that could affect its performance and aesthetic alignment. Overall, while most comments lean positive, these notes indicate areas of concern for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed favorable sentiments about the Morgan Plus 8, complimenting its performance and condition. @86acmkiv mentioned that they have owned three Morgans and found this one to be appealing. Similarly, @morganplus8 appreciated the driving experience and noted that the engine appears to be in good shape, indicating that it is reliable and durable. The aesthetic appeal of the car was also acknowledged, with comments highlighting the soundness of the chassis and the availability of parts for maintenance.
Neutral: Neutral comments focused on various questions regarding the vehicle's specifics and condition. @AJsMGBs and @DeftLeft raised points about the car's registration and compliance with California smog tests, while @KarenLizard provided background information on the car's previous owner. There was a mix of commentary on the car's service history and potential repairs needed, such as the inspection of the wood frame and the functionality of certain components. These inquiries show a mix of eagerness and caution among potential buyers.
Negative: Some commenters expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle's mileage and overall condition. @pbf777 questioned the authenticity of the claimed mileage, citing the accumulation of crud on the underside as suspicious. They also sought clarity on whether the car's body contained exclusively steel materials. Additionally, @Prairie-sky pointed out deficiencies such as the missing soft top and heater fan motor, questioning why these issues had not been addressed by the seller. These comments reflect concerns over the car’s history and readiness for use.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the appealing aspects of the vehicle. @pjr300, the seller, describes the Turbo Miata as a great running car that is extremely fast and free of issues, emphasizing that it starts immediately and has a rust-free body. Many users agree on the car's aesthetic appeal, with comments like 'Nice clean car!' from @cjklim and 'It’s a sweet ride & looks like it was put together very well' from @stg83. @stg83 also expresses sympathy for the seller's medical situation while praising the vehicle's construction. It's noted that the car has garnered positive attention from passersby, further bolstering its desirability among potential buyers.
Neutral: In terms of functionality and features, the discussion includes questions about various components and performance metrics. @jbbylund86 inquires about the yellow wire and vacuum lines, while others like @jwales ask about warning lights on the dash and whether the AC works. @Welch123 is curious about any changes made to the car by previous owners and inquires about its highway performance and suitability for a cross-state drive. The seller provides informative responses, clarifying the car’s turbo power and performance specifications, confirming it to be running around 240 RWHP with 10-12 lbs of boost, and assuring that the car drives great on the highway despite its modifications.
Negative: Some feedback indicates reservations about the vehicle and its history. @JJOHNSON53 describes the car's look as 'horrific' despite acknowledging the good execution, signaling mixed feelings about its design. Similarly, @Welch123 raises concerns regarding the vehicle's history, questioning how the seller has a prior connection to the car given its multiple ownerships in Ohio. There’s a hint of skepticism regarding the seller’s narrative, as they seek clarity on how well the car was maintained throughout its changes.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @tomgenetti described the car as his first love, highlighting its classic appeal. @topshoe noted that it is an 'Arnie Becker special' and commended the rarity and desirability of the 911/930 cabriolet, especially the 1989 Turbo model in white over silk grey. @eddieames called it a very cool Porsche and praised the aesthetics, while @LandSpeedster expressed that the front bumper is "unobtainium" and praised the car's appearance in white. @Fargie found the vehicle stunning and inquired about its location, indicating a positive impression.
Neutral: The seller, @Stunt_Road, responded to inquiries about the turbocharger repairs, indicating it was fully rebuilt and that an invoice is available for review. @Cosmo007 sought clarification on the details of the turbo repairs and requested information on the leather dashboard near the defrost vents, which @Stunt_Road addressed, reassuring that the leather is intact. @Odo asked about the results from the paint thickness meter, and @Stunt_Road confirmed that the readings show the paint is original. Concerns regarding the paint readings being indicative of a respray were raised by @bob930cab, but he later confirmed that it was indeed original single stage paint, adding context to the discussion.
Negative: @Cosmo007 raised concerns about the repairs on the turbocharger and questioned why the original OEM front bumper was replaced with the RUF part, suspecting possible damage did not have documentation. @BigTomAccetta questioned whether the car would pass smog in California, indicating potential regulatory issues. @bob930cab cautioned about the interpretation of paint thickness readings, initially suggesting they could indicate a respray, although he corrected this later. This discussion suggests a level of skepticism about the car's condition among some commentors.
![]() |
36k-Mile 2007 Chevrolet Express Explorer Limited SE Conversion Van
1GBGG29U671173607
Lot 204103
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @cdwatnsu expressed excitement over the unique color scheme of the vehicle and even suggested a photo shoot for potential buyers if they are local to South Carolina. @XLR8TG praised the van for its practicality, mentioning that it would be a great choice for big families looking to avoid spending excessively on a used Suburban, highlighting its reliable drivetrain and ample seating capacity. @Cole2002 (The Seller) emphasized the rare nature of the 9-passenger capacity and offered to provide additional images or information, expressing confidence in the vehicle's mechanical condition and cleanliness.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding the vehicle's specifications, with @VVanner and @tpv asking about dimensions, towing capacity, and legroom adjustments for the seating. @Cole2002 (The Seller) promptly responded with details about the van's roof height, towing capacity of 10,000 pounds, and the adjustability of the second and third-row captain's chairs. Additionally, @Patanjali asked about the rear air conditioning feature, which @Cole2002 confirmed is available and controllable from both the front and rear of the van, reflecting the vehicle's family-friendly design.
Negative: On a less positive note, @Patanjali raised concerns regarding mismatched tires and a broken piece of trim seen in one of the photos, requesting further clarification and images. @Cole2002 explained that the broken piece was due to an external incident while loading and clarified that the tires, although replaced, matched well in tread and were in great condition. This indicates that while the vehicle is overall well-maintained, there are minor aesthetic issues that potential buyers should consider.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Barryward commented on the vehicle's great transmission, mentioning it has a good 6-speed. @StuM suggested that with a good set of era-size Chevy Rally’s, the car would be perfect for cruising. In addition, @motorcarmarketusa (The Seller) praised the beauty of the vehicle as they welcomed everyone to the auction, expressing their enthusiasm for bringing it to market and ensuring transparency about the listing.
Neutral: @FerrariMikeF355 noted that the car is very close to being a perfect specification but critiqued the prior work done to address rust damage, suggesting it could have been handled better. @KP777 inquired whether there would be a driving video available, while @lasparky11 questioned what modifications had been made to the frame and praised the suspension upgrades. These comments reflect a general interest in the vehicle's features and performance.
Negative: @Hellvis raised concerns about potential past rust issues based on images of the underside, asking for details about the repairs conducted. @70Chevy_1 remarked that the vehicle had previously drawn scrutiny for rust issues that were inadequately addressed and merely painted over. @badgas expressed worry that the engine might be one of the 6.2 variations with known issues, which casts doubt over the car's reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @aegmotorsports has provided detailed information regarding the features of the 2014 Mercedes Benz W166 ML350, highlighting its Lane Keep Assist, Blind Spot Assist, and extensive safety packages which include Attention Assist and Distance Warning. The vehicle is fully equipped with premium features such as Bi-Xenon Head Lamps, Active Curve Illumination, and a surround view camera system. Many commenters appreciate the array of options, including heated seats and a moonroof, which enhance comfort and driving experience.
Neutral: Several commenters have posed questions about the vehicle's capabilities and features. @ArmyPAC inquired about the Lane Keep Assist package, which @aegmotorsports confirmed is included. @JB_Tx asked about the 'lighting package,' receiving verification that it is present. Others, such as @puttuno and @TristanvG mentioned the addition of towing capabilities and shared insights on the difficulty level, indicating a mixed sentiment about the vehicle's versatility as a luxury SUV.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about specific features not available in the ML350, such as the self-braking function mentioned by @phoenixrises, which @aegmotorsports clarified does not exist in this model. @SMjaded expressed a negative opinion about auto-braking systems based on personal experience, suggesting they can have risky outcomes. Additionally, @Ovation2 questioned the vehicle's history about potential corrosion, prompting @aegmotorsports to ensure that there are no issues to report, yet the initial concern indicates potential skepticism from buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dmftoy1 praised the bike for its impressive aesthetic, likening its header to steampunk design and appreciating the custom look provided by the slick electronics. @bkrbrnsrgn highlighted the craftsmanship involved, noting the custom machining and the striking paint job, which contribute to both the visual appeal and riding pleasure of the bike. The subtle attention to detail was also conveyed through @3DogNate's comments about the custom steering dampening knob and the quality of the ride offered by the YSS shocks, further reinforcing the bike's appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Throughout the comments, @3DogNate (The Seller) provided practical information regarding the bike's features and maintenance, including a change of oil to prepare for the auction winner and details about the comfortable rider's triangle provided by the fork extensions. @BJM56 inquired about bar height adjustments, which led to clarification about the bike's ergonomics. Additionally, @Apathyfern raised an important point about shipping costs impacting potential buyers, while @DoubleDelta4 sought further details about the included factory parts.
Negative: While there were many commendations about the bike's craftsmanship, a few concerns were evident. @Apathyfern expressed frustration over the high shipping costs, suggesting it could limit the number of potential buyers significantly. The mention of shipping rates being almost double compared to a car caused some skepticism about the practicality of purchasing the bike from a distance. While @DoubleDelta4 asked about the removed factory parts, implying a concern about what remains from the original bike, @3DogNate's response clarified that there’re not many significant parts left, which might not resonate well with buyers looking for original components.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed positive remarks about the 1985 Jeep CJ-7, noting its beauty and well-preserved condition. @dave_bosco praised the clean look of the Jeep and confirmed that the original color was Sebring red, further indicating that the current blue metallic paint is appealing. @tfrain and @Kdog1226 appreciated the Jeep's rust-free appearance, and @Kdog1226 specifically highlighted the classic look of the Jeep when the doors and top were removed, with @KJclassics (The Seller) providing extensive photo documentation to support these observations.
Neutral: The comments included various inquiries about the Jeep’s specifications and features. @tfrain asked to see pictures of the bottom of the doors and was inquiring about the condition of the hardtop, while @JOE486 sought clarification on the body lift design. @Kdog1226 also raised multiple questions about the vehicle's features, including height clearance with the hardtop, the operation of the four-wheel drive, and whether the steering wheel tilts. @KJclassics (The Seller) responded to these questions with detailed answers and offered to provide additional photos as requested.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding specific issues with the Jeep. @tfrain noted what appeared to be bubbling at the bottom of the driver side windshield and inquired about any potential rust. Furthermore, @Kdog1226 questioned the functionality of the hardtop lock, to which @KJclassics (The Seller) admitted not having a key to confirm whether it worked. Additionally, @Gregc123 pointed out that a video was initially marked private, which could have caused some frustration among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @SingleClutch highlights that the vehicle offers a great opportunity for those who cannot drive a manual, emphasizing its excellent handling, well-balanced design, and low mileage. The Winning Blue Metallic color is a standout feature that looks impressive in person. @fledermensch agrees, noting that the automatic transmission allows the engine to have an easier life at low RPMs, which contributes positively to the car's longevity.
Neutral: @NineNinetyThree993 expresses uncertainty about his feelings towards the model, recalling his fondness for the RX7 but is open to potentially growing to love this newer model. @Ycbmsma raises a question about the choice of a Pioneer touchscreen unit in a vehicle with only 3,000 miles, indicating some curiosity about the design decisions. Meanwhile, @luxuryautomax shares their recent purchase of a 6-speed version, implying satisfaction with the RX-8 experience as long as it's properly maintained.
Negative: @AndyisG voices a strong dissatisfaction with the vehicle, stating that it has been 'ruined' by the automatic transmission. @mazda2924x points out the potential drawbacks of the automatic version, such as a shorter lifespan and reduced performance compared to the manual. The concerns continue with @CarGuy2729 warning that the engine requires regular high RPM operation to avoid carbon buildup, casting doubt on the reliability of the automatic variants.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @solutionsguy praised the vehicle, calling it a clean 300SD W116 that looks well loved. @whipcity76 described it as a fantastic example of a W116, noting how well taken care of it appears. @S123Driver expressed admiration for the car, reminiscing about neighbors who owned the same model in the 70s and highlighting its features like rear headrests. @B.Freshley appreciated the efforts being made to address road noise and bearing issues, expressing optimism that the car would cruise smoothly after repairs.
Neutral: @CarsGlobal (The Seller) responded to comments regarding the A/C and confirmed it is blowing but not cold. They also clarified that the fuel tank is the original one, measuring 82 liters. @Leonidas noted potential drivetrain noise, to which the seller acknowledged front wheel bearings were noisy and have since been replaced. Updates about the vehicle’s condition and repairs were regularly posted by the seller, creating an informative dialogue about the car's status.
Negative: @Marcy1902 expressed concern about the A/C not working properly. @Leonidas raised a query about potential drivetrain issues and overall vehicle functionality. @Cblack pointed out that the tachometer and temperature gauge were not functioning initially, indicating a need for further inspection. @dieselbenzman urged the seller to remove the dashboard cover for a better look at the original condition, indicating dissatisfaction with the current state.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Manistee called the bike beautiful and reminisced about seeing a new Diana in a bike shop 60 years ago, still finding it gorgeous. @Slam105 expressed fond memories of owning a 1966 Diana, describing it as a nicely handling bike that was a pleasure to ride. @sfmonster23, the seller, shared that he purchased the bike from a retired gentleman and highlighted how well he takes care of it, noting the compliments it receives from everyone who sees it. @Motogrotto also praised the motorcycle, calling it a gem and appreciating the condition of @sfmonster23's collection.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed interest in the bike's history and condition. @66Malibu questioned if the bike could be the one he once owned, offering details about its past and restoration challenges. @Carmen214 inquired about technical details regarding the bike's 12v conversion and asked for confirmation about specific modifications, while @sfmonster23 assured that he would check with the previous owner.
Negative: In discussing the bike's condition, @66Malibu reflected on his past ownership, expressing regret over selling it and skepticism about its salvageable parts. @sfmonster23 shared his struggles in creating video content due to his back issues, indicating a reluctance to present the bike in its full glory. Additionally, @Carmen214 pointedly asked about the presence of receipts for the bike's work, implying concerns about documentation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @scottinalaska praises the vehicle's interior, expressing high admiration. @redtanrt10 also shares enthusiasm, describing the Smurf Blue color as beautiful and unique. @snarge reminisces fondly about their past MR2s, suggesting that the car has character and invokes nostalgia, particularly paired with memories of listening to the Beastie Boys. @unlgrad2002 notes the car's clean condition, which supports the reported mileage, while @mb4design reflects on the MR2's significance during the malaise era, seeing it as a bright spot in automotive history.
Neutral: @Insight, the seller, offers reassurance regarding the vehicle's condition and historical usage, explaining that the car has never been driven in the snow. They also confirm maintenance details like the air conditioning functioning and mention the absence of the common fifth gear pop-out issue, addressing potential buyer concerns directly. @johnjm recognizes the rarity of the blue color in the MR2 community and shares personal reflections linked to the model, highlighting how it evokes fond memories. @jimmy777 suggests that a driving video showcasing the shifting gears would be beneficial for the auction, pointing out a common concern among previous MR2 owners.
Negative: @JimK offers constructive criticism, suggesting that the engine bay could benefit from detailing and points out the missing front lip, which detracts slightly from the vehicle's overall appeal. @jimmy777 also raises a concern about the historical issue of fifth gear popping out, indicating that this has been a common problem for the model and implies further scrutiny is needed to ensure the vehicle is in tip-top shape. Overall, while the comments express a lot of enthusiasm and nostalgia, there are clear indications from some commenters that certain aspects of the car could be enhanced.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @stevieboy1, the seller, highlighted that this Mercedes Benz GLS 550 is a pristine, special-order vehicle with a wealth of high-end options. It comes with features like the Designo Diamond White Metallic Paint, a Bang & Olufsen sound system, and a panorama sunroof, providing luxury and comfort for its occupants. The seller mentions that the vehicle has been meticulously maintained with all service work done according to manufacturer specifications, indicating reliability for potential buyers. He also states that both previous owners had a strong commitment to maintaining the car, having addressed any issues promptly and performing regular maintenance on schedule, reinforcing the vehicle's appeal as a high-quality option for buyers.
Neutral: There were inquiries regarding specific components and features, such as concerns about the hitch and whether the vehicle has any noticeable odors from previous use. @krustykustom questioned the purpose of the hitch stiffener bar, while @waytoomanycarsshesays asked if the car had any odors or if smoking had occurred in the cabin. @hughespt inquired about the condition of the motor mounts, and @stevieboy1 responded that all necessary checks were performed during major service intervals, ensuring the vehicle's condition was kept in check. The seller also noted that while some potential buyers might hesitate due to the vehicle's mileage, he emphasized that, with proper upkeep, many Mercedes models maintain their performance and reliability well into higher mileage ranges.
Negative: Comments reflected some caution regarding the vehicle's high mileage and past warranty status. @professorkev articulated concerns about purchasing a high-mileage GLS, even while acknowledging its impressive maintenance history. @waytoomanycarsshesays echoed similar sentiments about the leery approach to past-warranty vehicles. Additionally, the seller shared his own experience with a battery that kept discharging despite replacements, suggesting some issues in the vehicle’s electronic systems that could cause potential buyers to reconsider. Moreover, the candid nature of the seller's disclosures about past challenges, including an expensive alternator replacement that might not have been necessary, presents some drawbacks that might concern buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mtulch provided detailed information about the vehicle's condition, confirming that there are no cracks in the dash and that the seats are in good shape. He also provided photos to support his claims, which were appreciated by interested buyers. The seller mentioned that the clutch was replaced during restoration and again in 2014, alleviating concerns about the vehicle's shifting performance, and he offered to retake pictures if needed.
Neutral: @zy1125 inquired about dents on the left side of the body, as well as the car's history with the family. @mtulch explained that the dents were caused during transport from New York to North Carolina, clarifying the situation for potential buyers. @jrn911sc asked several questions regarding the vehicle's frame, transmission, and overall condition, demonstrating due diligence in assessing the car's state before making a decision.
Negative: @plh1964 suggested that the appearance of the dash might be due to a cover, raising doubts about its original condition. Additionally, @jrn911sc's inquiries about possible rust through the body or floor panels and the status of the original engine indicated concerns over the vehicle's integrity. Though @mtulch responded patiently, these comments suggested some hesitancy among potential buyers regarding the car's history and condition.
![]() |
30-Years-Family-Owned Supercharged 400-Powered 1931 Chevrolet 5-Window Coupe Hot Rod
ID43022COLO
Lot 204127
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @rreed73, the seller, expresses enthusiasm about the vehicle, stating it has been a cherished family item for many years and is now looking for a new home. @02rc51 appreciates the classic design, particularly noting the '58 Chevy taillights, calling it a true Chevy. @rickaz adds a humorous touch to the conversation, suggesting caution when accelerating, and wishes the seller good luck with the sale.
Neutral: @rreed73 provides informative responses to questions about the vehicle's features, clarifying technical terms like the 'live axle' for @PSFarm, and confirming that the vehicle has a posi-traction differential. He also answers inquiries about the age and legality of the tires, mentions the condition of the heated seats, and gives an estimate of the RPM at highway speeds.
Negative: While the seller mentions that the tires are approximately five years old, @BPOTBAM raises concerns about their street legality and functionality, questioning whether anything is broken or not working as it should. @PSFarm inquires further about the differential features, indicating uncertainty regarding the vehicle's performance details.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed positive feedback regarding the vehicle's condition and features, indicating it appears well looked after. @lawdog185 praised the car's reliability and handling, mentioning that the V6 engine provides good power, while @SmithVolvo (The Seller) confirmed that the vehicle has been well maintained, with all accessories functioning correctly and no stored codes. Furthermore, @SmithVolvo noted that all four tires were replaced recently, enhancing the car's readiness for sale.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions about the specifics of the upholstery, with @SBBimmer questioning if the material was MB-Tex or leather, leading to further clarification from @SmithVolvo (The Seller) that the build sheet indicates leather. The interaction highlights a mix of uncertainty and attempts to clarify details about the seating material, illustrating an active interest in the car's specifications. @CTT also requested additional photographs to assess potential damage on the back seat, demonstrating a desire for thoroughness in evaluating the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns were raised about potential discrepancies in the upholstery details, as @SBBimmer referenced conflicting information from various sources about the leather designation. Some commenters expressed worries about the clarity regarding whether the material was authentic leather or artificial, which may impact perceptions of value. Additionally, @CTT pointed out perceived damage in the pictures provided, although @SmithVolvo initially attributed this to glare, indicating a possible need for reassurances about the vehicle's cosmetic condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Zingaro1 (The Seller) describes the vehicle as absolutely pristine, in showroom condition, with no blemishes and a low odometer reading of 11,830. This positive portrayal suggests a high-quality vehicle that has been well maintained.
Neutral: @Awshucks shares their experience with a similar vehicle, mentioning that they also encountered multiple prior owners but found it in pristine condition. They express curiosity about the current car's lower mileage and ask what it would bring on the market, reflecting a neutral stance focused on the car's performance potential. Additionally, both @Tlipcsey and @C6O_O raise questions about the quick turnaround and check on specific potential issues, which indicates their cautious approach to understanding the car's history and condition.
Negative: @moeandme2 voices concern over the 7 previous owners, indicating that this is a significant number which might raise red flags about the car's reliability. @Tlipcsey and @C6O_O echo this concern by questioning the reasons for the fast turnaround as well as inquiring about potential mechanical issues, suggesting some skepticism about the vehicle's overall dependability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle's coupe body style, with @Peter_K referring to it as one of the best-looking designs and expressing regret for having sold his own 97 coupe. @2027Katman (The Seller) agrees and notes the car's almost 28-year-old charm which still impresses many. @Overlandish calls it a fantastic looking car and a great opportunity for a unique project, while @2027Katman shares his hopes that the winning bidder will enjoy the car as much as he does. Others, like @BallCoach, appreciate the seller's transparency and detail about the car's current condition.
Neutral: There are mixed discussions about the condition and repairs needed for the vehicle. @UNGN highlights potential concerns regarding the brake calipers and mentions that the car could suffer from transmission issues, which @2027Katman acknowledges, citing the gear shifter as a possible point of concern. He also shares additional information about interior maintenance and a detailed history of repairs made since 2010, aiming to clarify the vehicle's status and reassure potential buyers. Overall, there’s a recognition of the car's beauty paired with the understanding that it requires work.
Negative: On the downside, commenters, including @HeavyTank77, raise concerns about the car being a project vehicle due to transmission issues and the description of it not being drivable at the moment. @PolarFBear points out various needs such as repainting, serious corrosion on the wheels, and worn-out parts, while still admiring the body of the car. @BallCoach also inquires about potential odors and functioning electrical components, reflecting hesitations among potential buyers regarding the car's overall condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed excitement about the unique features of the vehicle, particularly mentioning the 7-speed stick shift transmission, which one user called "cool." @RMully (The Seller) highlighted that the Bronco handles well in everyday driving situations, averaging 21.2 MPG, and is particularly responsive in Sport mode. Additionally, the vehicle is described as representing a Heritage Edition, tying it to the classic 1966 Bronco, which piqued interest among some community members, such as @JayKay2430.
Neutral: There was a discussion regarding the vehicle's ownership history, as @Hairball raised concerns about it being on its second owner shortly after purchase. @RMully (The Seller) clarified that the vehicle was bought used from a Ford dealer in Texas and that the reason for selling it is due to moving to a new house and needing to downsize. There was also mention of two recalls, both of which the seller indicated they had appointments to address, showing accountability in managing the vehicle's safety.
Negative: Concerns were voiced about the unresolved recalls, prompting @Hairball to inquire if @RMully plans to handle them before the auction's conclusion. @RMully confirmed a scheduled appointment with a Ford dealer but later noted that issues with parts availability may delay resolving the recalls. Modifications were also critiqued with some skepticism towards the hardtop’s durability, as @Hairball referenced online reports of fractures. Additionally, several small blemishes were reported on the vehicle, such as paint chips and interior imperfections, which might affect buyer interest.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @lemondzurich highlights the allure of a Black/Black S2000, calling it 'badass,' while @Yeti413 commends the seller @The_Dude_Abides for consistently offering high-quality vehicles, mentioning a previous successful purchase of a low-mileage Challenger Red Eye from him. The seller also expresses his passion for the S2000 platform, stating it has been a beloved part of his life for about 20 years. Commenters like @Fore echo the sentiment that black is associated with speed, reinforcing the positive perception of the vehicle's color.
Neutral: @The_Dude_Abides (The Seller) provides a transparent overview of the vehicle, emphasizing that it may not be the 'best of the best' S2000 but is a solid driver with low mileage. He shares details about the car's condition, including regular maintenance like new tires and a recent inspection. The seller promises full disclosure in his listings, which includes comprehensive photos, and reassures potential buyers about the vehicle's overall quality, despite its age.
Negative: However, some comments raise concerns. @Yeti413 praises the seller's approach but questions the condition of the vehicle, referencing a potential issue with rust as noted by @AnonUserD4hfm. @Jeronomo echoes this concern, implying that the car might have been exposed to corrosive conditions during its life, especially considering its age and the minor signs of wear observed in the images. This highlights a cautious sentiment among some users regarding the vehicle's long-term preservation and potential hidden issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Electraglider shared that after extensive searching, he found this LS430, highlighting its beautiful California Walnut interior, which he considers rare and of high quality compared to similar vehicles. He praised the car's performance during a 6000-mile trip, noting it averaged 26.5 miles per gallon and provided ultra-quiet comfort at high speeds.
Neutral: @Rarecars (The Seller) addressed inquiries from potential buyers, confirming that all windows operate smoothly and that the HVAC system works normally. He also included that a video with sound of the engine and driving has been added, and pictures requested by @snib65 will be included soon. Additionally, he clarified that the adaptive cruise control is not available on this model, but the power-tilt/telescoping steering column functions properly.
Negative: @soos_ramirez commented on the car's color, calling it 'old man gold', which implies a negative sentiment on the aesthetic appeal while asking about the operational status of some features. @snib65 raised concerns regarding specific areas of the vehicle's interior and the visibility of potential wear, showing skepticism about condition despite the positive details provided about the functionality of car systems.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments regarding the vehicle reflect a strong appreciation for its aesthetics and build quality. @LewisSainous mentioned the clean restoration and the positive impact of the front and rear crossover bars. @hunterfisher and @JosephAuto reminisced fondly about their experiences with similar cars, with the former expressing a desire to bid if the car was red, indicating a personal connection and admiration for its beauty. Several commenters praised the car's exterior and new paint, noting it is solid, straight, and rust-free, and would serve as a great vehicle for driving anywhere, as highlighted by @mikegt62L.
Neutral: Several comments also sought clarification and additional information about specific aspects of the vehicle. @LauraB questioned the originality of the seats, believing they may not be original, while @Msm7845 raised inquiries about the wheel alignment. @WJFOLK2 expressed interest in viewing the car in person, implying a serious consideration for purchase. The Seller, @StanF, provided detailed explanations about the restoration work and the current condition of the car while engaging with the commentors to address their questions and concerns, such as those regarding the oil leaks highlighted by @Rekrab and @Usmaan_88.
Negative: Negative insights mainly focus on concerns regarding some modifications and potential issues. @LewisSainous pointed out that the seats seem to be from a different model altogether, potentially detracting from the vehicle's authenticity. @Rekrab noted observations of oil droplets around the transmission and sought clarification on their source, reflecting a cautious approach to the vehicle's condition. Some comments also discussed the design aspect of the rear wheels tilting inward, which @LewisSainous confirmed was by design but could lead to misunderstandings among potential bidders. Overall, while the negativity was relatively mild, it highlighted important considerations for prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @russ5123 (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a well-maintained Porsche that he has owned for 10 years without any shifting issues. He provides details about the car's modifications, including GT3 turbos and HRE wheels, and notes that it has passed emissions in Georgia annually. @arcturus commends the unique appearance due to the body mods and wheels, indicating a favorable impression of how the car looks.
Neutral: There are ongoing inquiries from potential buyers about the vehicle's modifications, service history, and the presence of any documentation, with @g8rjimbo asking specific questions regarding the intercoolers and coolant lines. @Jeepwayoflife seeks clarification on the tires and maintenance history, while @bostonaudi suggests a driving video to showcase the vehicle's performance. While the seller acknowledges the existence of a branded title due to an odometer discrepancy, he assures that the car is not salvaged and has a clean title.
Negative: Concerns have been raised by users such as @Grandpa007 about the car's potential to pass smog requirements in California, which may limit prospective buyers. @Jeepwayoflife points out potential issues like non-functioning electrical components and doubts about the oil condition under the car. Additionally, @PorscheTeam expresses skepticism regarding the lack of records for crucial maintenance, like pinning the coolant lines, suggesting this is a significant oversight that might concern buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Erioc praises the car's design, calling it "simply beautiful" and a wonderful example of the 1967 wonders, wishing the seller the best of luck with the auction. @broodie shows enthusiasm for the vehicle, considering the '67 442 the best among GM muscle cars that year and remarking on its fine qualities. @Muscleguy69 admires the car's interior, describing it as "delicious."
Neutral: @Jenks40, the seller, engages with potential buyers by thanking them for their bids and offering to answer any questions. They provide details about the vehicle's convertible top condition and clarify the absence of original wheels. Additionally, the seller confirms that the body panels are original and intends to address inquiries regarding the hood's appearance.
Negative: @Wydomkr raises concerns about the vehicle's hood, expressing confusion over its appearance and the area around the hood latch striker. They mention a past experience of spinning rod bearings in similar engines. Moreover, @Dickiee shares a negative personal experience with a similar car, illustrating a regretful sale due to rising gas prices during an oil embargo.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Sirmgreco expressed amazement at the vehicle, stating, 'Holy crap this is nuts :o', while @Bugaloo911 described it as 'a very well sorted Disco.' @Caleks praised it as 'the D2 we all dream of having', commenting on its perfect modifications and suggesting the addition of an expedition rack. @Tgunner also shared positivity, stating, 'wow this thing is perfect,' which reflects a strong overall impression of the vehicle's condition and enhancements.
Neutral: @JackMac pointed out that potential bidders should check out the TFL YouTube video linked to the prior auction in February 2023 for more context. @winningmakes, the Seller, clarified that the vehicle has been garage-kept and regularly started, providing reassurance about its maintenance during the two and a half years of limited use. @winningmakes also confirmed that they would be uploading videos of the vehicle running and additional underside photos soon, which may help potential buyers gauge its condition further.
Negative: @bobearski raised concerns about the limited use of the vehicle, noting that the owner added only 288 miles in 2.5 years. @SleeperKeeper echoed this sentiment, inquiring about the vehicle's storage conditions and maintenance history, specifically regarding the lack of fluid changes and a potential noise issue inside the cabin. @SleeperKeeper's questions highlight a lack of confidence in the vehicle's current state and raised concerns about the previous oil leak from the transfer case, reflecting some apprehension among potential bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @bazillaroche appreciates the beauty of the Quattroporte, mentioning it has a lovely design and jokingly points out what might be a Tucker in the photos. @Aaron emphasizes the magnificence of the early pre-facelift models, sharing his personal experience driving one from 54,000 to 180,000 miles with no issues, while highlighting its beautiful and organic design. @NateEvans79, who owns a 2008 Quattroporte GTS, expresses his love for the car's sound and performance, noting modifications he made that enhanced its exotic appeal. He praises the car's value, indicating that one cannot find such a high-quality Italian supercar with four doors at such a great price.
Neutral: Several commenters are engaged in technical discussions about necessary upgrades for the Quattroporte's performance. @BostonBlackie inquires about the costs associated with the intake cam variator upgrade and the oil check valve mod, revealing that dealership rates for the repairs could amount to around $12K, as explained by @Aaron. There seems to be a consensus that while some modifications are recommended, like the oiling mod, there are varying opinions on how critical these repairs are for engine safety and reliability, with @sg_reno mentioning that specific machining appears inexpensive when compared to dealer prices.
Negative: Comments indicate a few concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance and reliability. @82elky questions whether the startup rattle repairs are essential, expressing that $12K for repairs seems excessive while also wondering about potential engine damage if the rattle is ignored. @Sledge4.2 shares skepticism about the necessity of changing variators if they are not damaged. Additionally, @brainspt raises a concern about the car's safety and reliability for long drives, implying that these factors may concern potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments praised the vehicle for its nostalgic charm and unique character. @Mayjer remarked on how nice the Clubman is and highlighted that not many of these models come up for sale. @CKKurtz described it as one of the coolest listings on the site, finding the design of the barn doors and 10" Minilites adorable. @bondgraham also commented on the vehicle's loveliness, while @ForrestGump humorously called it a "true babe magnet," further adding to the positive sentiment surrounding the car.
Neutral: The comments captured varying opinions about the vehicle's specifications and history. @jlemieux (The Seller) clarified the confusion regarding the model year, stating the title lists it as a '73, but it was likely produced in 1980 based on further research. Commenters such as @malsal discussed engine specifics, suggesting its engine displacement was a 998cc rather than the stated 1098cc. The discussion about engine numbers highlighted ongoing uncertainty regarding the car's exact details and history, which led to further inquiries and skepticism about the car's condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's mechanical condition, especially regarding the wheel bearings and brakes. @broodie expressed doubt about potential strain on the wheel bearings due to wheel spacers. @jlemieux shared that the car had developed a brake issue just before the auction ended, causing alarm among bidders. They mentioned the brake pedal lost pressure and there was an uncertainty about the source of the issue. Such mechanical problems potentially affect the car's appeal and could deter interest from prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is highly regarded within the community, with many commenters expressing admiration for its condition and historical significance. @sdrcp celebrates it as the ultimate car of the 1980s, fondly recalling the model's original debut. Several users, including @Z282SLO and @ecrabb, note its aesthetic and performance features, praising the tasteful modifications and its relatively low mileage of 18,669, which allows it to be enjoyed as a "driver" rather than a garage queen. Additionally, @jakejake66 (The Seller) highlights that the auction includes several original accessories, such as the original Molly GNX hat, jacket, and towels, further appealing to collectors.
Neutral: Comments frequently inquire about specific features and components of the vehicle, indicating an engaged and curious audience. @newcarpro and @clemsgn bring up questions regarding the included plates and exhaust, demonstrating a thorough interest in the vehicle's originality and modifications. The seller, @jakejake66, is responsive to these inquiries, confirming details like the inclusion of the cold air intake and the original paint. These interactions suggest that potential buyers are carefully evaluating the car's specifications and history, which adds depth to the auction discussion.
Negative: Despite the overall positive buzz, some users express concerns regarding specific elements of the vehicle. @ksd1861 points out that the stock exhaust system has limitations due to its design, raising questions about the performance enhancements made. Additionally, concerns arise from @markh56, who asks about the rockers and mentions visible chips on the rock guard that may require attention. These comments indicate that while the general sentiment is positive, there are lingering questions about the car's condition and modifications that could dissuade potential bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @fledermensch praised the RX-7, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @CoachT shared his experience with owning an 85 GSL, noting its popularity and the fun of driving it. @31rx7 expressed admiration for the 1981 to 1985 GSL, indicating it is the best version of the first-generation RX-7, highlighting its balance and engine responsiveness. @onlyhonda4me appreciated the charm of the first-gen RX-7 and encouraged the seller to use better photographs, insisting that such a beautiful car deserves the best presentation. @onlyhonda4me also reminisced about owning models from the 1980s and the joy of the rotary engine, wishing the seller well for the future owner.
Neutral: @85RichRotary (The Seller) provided updates about the car's features and corrections regarding the Carfax report, addressing misconceptions about the tail lights and detailing that there was never any damage. Other commenters, including @Out2fly1 and @Magooracing, inquired about the emissions equipment and its current status. @Bob99b5 raised questions about the odometer functionality and air conditioning performance, attempting to clarify mileage and whether the A/C was converted to a more modern standard.
Negative: @forrest3 critiqued a video of the car, questioning the depiction of the 'brief drive forward' as underwhelming and suggested that it lacked the 'ripping, red-lining' experience typical of the RX-7. @forrest3 also called for better videos to showcase the car at high revs, reflecting that the excitement of the RX-7 is tied to its performance. @85RichRotary (The Seller) acknowledged the challenges of selling as a first-time seller and a senior citizen, expressing some frustration about the lack of A/C conversions and addressing questions about the emissions state of the vehicle. Overall, some commenters felt the presentation could be improved to better highlight the vehicle's qualities.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ReimelMC (The Seller) expresses excitement about offering the rare, factory-supercharged Excalibur, noting its unique features and exceptional condition. The car boasts over 400 horsepower, a lightweight build, and various rare factory options that contribute to its special character. The seller highlights the thorough servicing invested, ensuring the vehicle is in top running order and ready for enjoyment, showcasing the car's thrilling experience reminiscent of outrunning Shelby Cobras, as shared by the original owner @Fred M.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @maximosca and @Hulk2000, inquire about specific details, such as the build sheet and the presence of seatbelts. @PaulGri asks about fitting taller drivers, to which @ReimelMC responds affirmatively, noting a 6'5" associate found the Excalibur comfortable. @Evan raises questions about modified features, while others share personal anecdotes about Excalibur experiences, providing context and additional history related to this unique vehicle.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism about the car's performance claims. @packardv8 doubts the assertion that the Excalibur could outrun Shelby Cobras, sharing personal experiences with similar vehicles. @maximosca mentions the oddity of the serial number plate being relocated, while other commenters point out various modifications that may affect authenticity. Overall, there are hints of skepticism regarding the advertised performance and the original specifications of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @A_MOTORS (The Seller) welcomes potential buyers to the auction and assures them that the Carfax shows consistent service history. The seller offers reasonable shipping and pickup options, emphasizing the clear Oklahoma title and availability of a temp tag. The description indicates the vehicle is well-maintained and provides peace of mind to prospective buyers.
Neutral: @blue_car_club appreciates the unique tan leather interior of the vehicle, complimenting it as a refreshing change from lighter options. @A_MOTORS (The Seller) responds to this positive note by confirming the great condition of the interior while mentioning minor imperfections on the exterior, including touched-up rock chips and repainted areas. The seller also provides assurance regarding any potential issues with the dash wood by referring to a warranty related to certain models, advising interested parties to consult their local dealer for verification.
Negative: @DrPhos raises concerns about potential issues with camshaft adjusters in the 3.5L engines, reflecting on past experiences with older models such as the C250 and ML320. @A_MOTORS (The Seller) acknowledges this issue but reassures that there are extended warranties available for certain models that cover camshaft adjusters, although this may not alleviate all worries. Additionally, @blue_car_club inquires about the presence of any electronic issues and raises questions about possible rust or corrosion, hinting at concerns related to the vehicle's history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the appeal of the vehicle, particularly praising its aesthetic and performance attributes. @Juvanni describes the WS6 as 'fantastic' and expresses a desire to purchase it if it weren't for recent commitments, while @Gmmuscleusa admires the matching windows and overall beauty of the car. @JosCherry also commends the car’s condition and the potential success of its auction, indicating that the vehicle is in superior shape, especially with its M6 transmission.
Neutral: There are informative exchanges among various commentors regarding specific features and minor issues related to the vehicle. @bstrockis (The Seller) provides details about the inoperable passenger window, clarifying that it intermittently functions and has been a recent issue, along with mentioning a common defect on the sail panel. @MidCitiesMildMan offers background information about the car’s specifications and history, lending depth to the discussion.
Negative: However, certain comments bring up concerns regarding potential repairs and reliability. @2002WS6 suggests the window regulator may also need replacement, adding that tackling the motor alone could be hazardous. @dagnabbit7 expresses skepticism about the reliability of the brass gear replacement, sharing personal experiences of struggles with motor replacements over the years. Additionally, @Dvredc5 requests clarity about sail panel damage, indicating a concern that may deter interest from potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its appearance and performance. @jdf1271 highlighted the beautiful color combination and described the car as incredibly fast, likening its speed to that of a Bugatti. @boaboyoz expressed admiration for the car's aesthetics, calling it a splendid specimen. @GatorDMD echoed these sentiments, labeling the Turbo S as a beautiful and great daily driver. Additionally, @Amstar1 (The Seller) provided thorough history and maintenance details, assuring potential buyers of the car's outstanding condition and driveability, which was well-received by viewers.
Neutral: Some comments sought additional information about the car's specifics. For example, @flat6911pm inquired about the presence of paint protection film (PPF), which @Amstar1 (The Seller) confirmed was absent. Other requests included more detailed pictures of the seats and undercarriage from @carman725511 and @Wanger007, who were looking for assurance of the vehicle's condition. The seller responded by promising to provide the additional information and images when possible, which shows a willingness to engage with interested buyers.
Negative: Conversely, there were concerns expressed regarding the car's condition. @vitasshiamg pointed out a potential issue with the leather underlining, while @carman725511 asked for clarification on a squeaking noise noted in the driving video. @Hamptoncars raised questions about the car's short ownership history, with some commenters speculating about potential underlying issues. @Amstar1 (The Seller) addressed many of these queries, but worries about the leather wear and operational noises persisted, implying some buyers may still have concerns despite the seller's responses.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle, particularly highlighting its exceptional condition and original features. @fergmgb expressed admiration for the new color combination, indicating it was nicely done. @39Ford called the car a 'jewel' with very few deficiencies, noting its appealing under-hood condition and suggesting it's a keeper. @Russ commended @Turbotravel for the fantastic job in preparing the car, stating it looks nearly 'factory new.' @Shellys expressed a strong desire to own an MGB, reflecting enthusiasm for the car's overall presentation and condition.
Neutral: @EdFried raised a question about the vehicle’s emissions compliance but eased into a positive note upon discovering it had a current California tag, indicating it passed the emissions test. @NiallsShortbear's response indicated awareness of the previous auction context, but there was no clear judgment in the comment. @Turbotravel, the seller, provided insights into the car's history and condition, emphasizing it has less than 40K miles, is virtually rust-free, and retained its original paint which was detailed to look appealing.
Negative: Some comments pointed out minor flaws or areas for improvement. @39Ford mentioned the need for new shiny hub caps and that the top was not properly folded. @rbenb65, while overall positive, suggested the seller should have replaced faded center MG wheel cap badges after investing in powder coating the wheels. These critiques reflect concerns for aesthetics and upkeep which could detract from the vehicle's presentation and authenticity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @willy expresses satisfaction with the vehicle, noting that it offers a solid driving experience. @ActionJackson007 shares a personal recommendation, mentioning their kids drive the same model which has proven to be very reliable. Overall, bidders appreciate the 4Runner's reputation for reliability, low maintenance, and longevity, as highlighted by @BidRunner (The Seller), who assures prospective buyers of its quality and offers to answer any queries regarding the vehicle.
Neutral: @mfu77 requests the seller to post videos demonstrating the vehicle's functionality, specifically the driving experience and 4x4 capabilities, indicating a desire for more visual information. @nolanski mentions that they own a similar model but with more rust, expressing a wish for their vehicle to be in the condition presented in the auction. Additionally, @cfiorillo raises a question about the accuracy of some features listed in the auction description, showing engagement with the listing details without passing judgment on the vehicle itself.
Negative: @bocomac comments on the classification of the vehicle, arguing that it is not truly vintage or classic, despite their personal enjoyment of it. @cfiorillo’s inquiry regarding the authenticity of certain driver aids hints at a lack of trust in the listing’s accuracy. Furthermore, @tjivy expresses frustration in accessing the shipping quote on the app, reflecting potential difficulties users may face in navigating the auction process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @95RioSnake praised the vehicle, calling it a "perfectly combo’d Boss 302 package." @ZstngZ expressed joy in owning a similar model, saying it made him smile when he checked his own car. @PP0001 complimented the color combination and provenance of the vehicle, asking for confirmation on the VIN and expressing excitement over the auction, while other commenters appreciated the low mileage and good condition of the car as mentioned by @KMXglen (The Seller). @Magnum21 noted that the car's paint and body condition were impressive with minimal visible wear.
Neutral: @KMXglen (The Seller) provided insights about the car's customs clearance and specifications. The seller confirmed that while original accessories such as the window sticker were not available immediately, they were on the way. Responding to inquiries about modifications, @KMXglen also discussed the clutch spring’s removal and the condition of the Alcantara seats, asserting that their appearance was due to lighting rather than stains. The seller showed willingness to accommodate potential buyers with inspections and videos of the vehicle's features.
Negative: @Magnum21 raised concerns about corrosion under the vehicle, which they felt was more than typical for a car with only 28,000 miles. @RoxyVendena questioned the quality of repairs regarding paint flaking spots, indicating potential ongoing issues. Additionally, @Nko79 inquired about possible modifications made to accommodate aftermarket lights, expressing apprehension about restoration. These comments reflect apprehensions about the car's condition despite its otherwise positive reviews.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @skl48 shared a nostalgic experience about his son's love for Porsches, highlighting the Cayman S's impressive appeal and longevity within families. @BlitzLead praised the car as the best GT sports car value available, noting the craftsmanship Porsche invests in their vehicles. @JFoglia described the car's color as captivating, calling it one of the sexiest Caymans they have encountered, while @AutoDreamRides (The Seller) consistently emphasized the car's well-maintained condition, including its flawless paint and thorough care by previous owners.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed curiosity about the vehicle's specifications. @septicore and @DA505 inquired about additional undercarriage photos and service records, reflecting a desire for more visual and historical context regarding the vehicle's maintenance. @JSG1983 and @Spokayman discussed the car's ride height and the potential for modified suspension, leading to questions about the type of springs installed and the overall setup of the vehicle's suspension and brakes, implying a community effort to clarify its specifications.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car's emission history and modifications. @colethorin questioned the reason for a recent emissions failure, while @DA505 highlighted potential discrepancies in the brake rotors, asking for details on wear and maintenance history, which seemed unclear to some. @sumeetk's inquiry into whether the car had been tracked, given its suspension and brake modifications, added to the uncertainty surrounding the vehicle’s past, and several comments reflected skepticism about the adequacy of the Seller's disclosures.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a genuine admiration for the 1959 Cadillac Eldorado Seville, with many recognizing it as a rare and beautiful collector's item. @bobsinhawaii highlights the emotional bond that enthusiasts have with their vehicles, noting that they evoke a sense of character and status. @boaboyoz describes the car as an exquisite specimen, wishing luck to potential buyers, while @1969HurstOlds appreciates the hardtop coupe's unique qualities and ease of ownership compared to its convertible counterparts. Commenters like @CARSFORTOYS (The Seller) emphasize the car's restoration and the level of craftsmanship involved, portraying it as a rolling statement of American automotive artistry.
Neutral: Several commenters posed inquiries about the vehicle, seeking clarification on technical aspects like the air conditioning system and the authenticity of certain features. @magn and @Geekhauler raised questions regarding the gauge functionality, while @K51020Ranch pointed out specific details related to the restoration process. These comments indicate that potential buyers are interested in verifying the car's condition and specifications. Although some users acknowledged the car's beauty, they also sought more information before making a decision on potential ownership.
Negative: A number of comments pointed out discrepancies and concerns regarding the car's restoration and parts authenticity. @quimby1961 criticized the seller's description of the restoration as lacking accuracy, suggesting that various components, including colors and interior materials, were not factory correct. Additionally, @TailfinsandChrome noted that although the car looks beautiful at first glance, there were significant inaccuracies that could affect its value. @Bigfins echoed similar sentiments about the car's authenticity, suggesting it would appeal more to someone interested in driving rather than preserving its original state.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @911r mentioned that the car has been well maintained, originally bought for his wife in 2016 and later used as a friend loaner car. The air suspension functions perfectly and various maintenance tasks, including a coolant system and suspension bushings replacement, were performed. @Aimeedawn, who drove the car as her daily driver for over eight years, praised the exceptional care the vehicle received, noting it was garaged at night and well taken care of.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about service records and what specific repairs had been made beyond routine maintenance. @bobearski and @max_speed expressed interest in the history of significant repairs and service records, specifically asking about major components like the timing chain and oil changes. @911r reassured them that although comprehensive records were not maintained outside of his shop, relevant details would be shared soon including compression test results and inspection outcomes.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the lack of mileage records from 2018 to 2022, with @bobearski noting this was an important oversight. @Dave-ooo questioned an engine oil leak described as a minor seepage and @chip388 asked about a rattling sound heard in a test drive video, to which @911r attributed it to cup holder trim noise rather than mechanical issues. Additionally, @bobearski pointed out a broken towing chain mount and sought clarification on whether this was linked to previous damage from 2016.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @bballin1997 (The Seller) emphasizes that the Aston Martin is currently running well, stating it drives like a dream and inviting interested buyers to reach out for more information or photos. Additionally, he mentions that the car has been well maintained and most recommended maintenance has likely been performed, which could provide confidence to potential buyers. Furthermore, @bballin1997 highlights the car's beauty, indicating that it is an appealing purchase.
Neutral: There is an exchange of logistical details and inquiries about the car's condition. @surebeted expresses interest in viewing the vehicle, and @WisdomFirst seeks confirmation about the car's ownership history and strut functionality, which @bballin1997 promptly addresses. The conversation also touches on registration details with @CalBoiler asking about the vehicle's current registration status in California and its expiration date, which @bballin1997 confirms has expired in February 2023.
Negative: There are concerns raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly the driver's door strut, which @bballin1997 acknowledges is a bit weak but still functional. Additionally, there are unanswered questions about whether specific maintenance tasks, like the replacement of plugs and coils, have been completed as there is no definitive paperwork available. This uncertainty could create hesitation among potential buyers looking for comprehensive maintenance records.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Urbanista describes the MG TD as a lovely and well-presented vehicle, evoking nostalgia as their mother drove a similar model into her 90s. They appreciate the charm of the car but note the wheels may require some attention, indicating potential for restoration. @DHeuss (The Seller) mentions that despite owning several British cars, this vehicle has been driven a few times each season and highlights that much of the heavy work has been done, suggesting it's close to being in mint condition with some minor effort.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions and inquiries about the MG TD. @AustinTexasBuyer expressed interest in acquiring the car to match their existing 1951 MGTD, asking about driving frequency and reasons for sale. @broodie requested additional photos of specific car features and areas, adding to the conversation regarding the vehicle's condition. @mcwood advised @AustinTexasBuyer on using the contact seller button for inquiries, showing varying levels of engagement from potential buyers.
Negative: Comments also highlight some concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and specifics. @Steve76063 pointed out a potential photo discrepancy, suggesting not all images accurately reflect the vehicle. @Fertabarez requested images of corrosion areas, showing there may be issues present that need addressing. @Fez asked about the type of seat material, and @Fertabarez also inquired about the presence of seatbelts, indicating concerns about safety features that may be lacking in the MG TD.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @dougbrown describes the vehicle as an "Amazing unicorn" and expresses nostalgia for their previous model, indicating the vehicle is appealing and memorable. @1click2many highlights the rarity and desirability of the car, mentioning its super low mileage and desirable two-door design, suggesting that it is an exceptional find. @PedalCar shares their firsthand experience, noting that the vehicle felt as fresh and pristine as if it were brand new from the dealership, which underscores its excellent condition.
Neutral: @dieselbenzman requests additional video content to showcase the vehicle's features and functionality, reflecting a desire for more information rather than a clear opinion on the vehicle itself. @DLVRYMN hints at some intriguing aspects of the vehicle's history, suggesting a recent purchase at Mecum, which provokes curiosity but does not categorize the vehicle positively or negatively. @genevamotorcars (The Seller) responds to @DLVRYMN's comment with confusion, indicating a need for clarification about the previous remark without taking a position on the vehicle's value or quality.
Negative: @fsacb3 makes a somewhat suspicious comment about another user, @SkyEyes, without providing any direct feedback on the vehicle itself, implying a lack of transparency in auction activities related to the sale, which can cast a shadow on the sale process. While this comment does not critique the vehicle directly, it raises doubts that could influence potential buyers' perceptions. Overall, there is no straightforward negative feedback regarding the vehicle from the commentators.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous commenters such as @HBM0302 and @Ajax14 expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its status as a 'survivor' and appreciating its original features. @wem5310 remarked on the aesthetic appeal, noting it was refreshing to see a color other than black. @RobBobT was excited about the vehicle's appeal, inquiring about the AC functionality, while @CoolCustomsGarage nostalgically reminisced over the car's historical charm and performance reminiscent of 1977, expressing a desire to relive those moments.
Neutral: Several comments showed a mix of curiosity and information-sharing about specifics of the car. @mcj4250 and @Habu2 discussed modifications made to the fuel spouts to accommodate unleaded gasoline, while @Dollseyes (The Seller) provided clarifications regarding the car's fuel system modifications and parts history. A conversation emerged about the condition of various components of the vehicle, such as the catalytic converter, with multiple users contributing their personal experiences with similar vehicles in regard to maintenance and modification.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition, specifically the absence of certain original parts. @DG78 pointed out that the center chin spoiler was missing and inquired about it, while also asking for specific photos to assess the car's condition. @euclid3336 and @wyckoffmichael discussed potential overheating issues and exhaust system implications related to historical leaded gasoline usage. Overall, while there was considerable interest in the vehicle, certain aspects raised questions about its completeness and functionality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @JSandov8 (The Seller) provided detailed responses to inquiries about the vehicle, demonstrating transparency about repairs and maintenance. @Calidriver appreciates the character and depth of the black color, suggesting it enhances the vehicle's appeal. @Kromkreb highlights the unique Italian charm of the car, suggesting it offers a pleasurable driving experience compared to its competitors like the Cayman.
Neutral: @BadBadDog inquired about the specifics of previous damage and repairs, to which @JSandov8 responded with a clear outline of the repairs carried out. @Kayk47 noted the potential for paint chips and recommended a wrap, while @Volzke sought assurance regarding the dealer's servicing of chassis bolts. The comments reflect a mix of curiosity and confirmation requests about the car's condition and history.
Negative: @Max_Korolchuk raised concerns about the check engine light, while @MajorMing questioned any damage to the carbon fiber structure following a minor accident. There were queries about the lack of protective film (PPF) after the refinishing work, with @Dubaikhan clarifying the implications of this in relation to new stone chips that may have occurred. These negative observations reflect a clear desire to ensure the vehicle's reliability and safeguarding against future issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ForzaCarCompanyPA (The Seller) mentioned that the Mack AB truck is an "impossibly cool" vehicle and shared that it has been well-cared for as a mascot for the owner's family mill, which has a long history dating back to 1875. The seller expressed appreciation for the kind comments received about the truck, highlighting its charm and nostalgia.
Neutral: Several commenters asked for more specific details about the truck's dimensions, including @fbartolo's request for the total length, height, and width of the flatbed. @Riversidefarms inquired about the carburetor area and the functionality of the gears and winch, while @kalpaper questioned the top speed of the vehicle. The seller responded promptly to these inquiries, indicating characteristics of the truck without making any strong assurances.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Riversidefarms about whether the winch is functional since it hasn't been tested under the current ownership, raising doubts about the truck's operational capabilities. @kalpaper questioned if the top speed of 20 mph might be too low, hinting at potential performance issues. @WizardKing1023 expressed confusion over shipping options for such a large vehicle, suggesting a lack of clarity from BaT regarding transportation logistics.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @tesoffice (The Seller) portrays the Chevy Silverado 1500 LTZ truck as a remarkable vehicle. The original owner was fastidious about maintenance, and with a complete service history, @tesoffice assures potential buyers of its excellent condition. Features like heated and ventilated seats still function properly after the leather replacement, and the overall craftsmanship and appearance of the vehicle are highly praised, making it a visually appealing option. @Carguy114 even complimented the upgraded leather chairs, highlighting the truck's aesthetic appeal. Furthermore, @tesoffice shared videos demonstrating the truck's running condition, contributing to its positive perception.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding specific mechanical aspects of the truck, particularly the transmission and engine operations. @chadsage and @dd9 expressed concerns they had about potential transmission and lifter issues common to this vehicle's model, which @tesoffice addressed by confirming that the transmission had been rebuilt and is under warranty. The discussions indicate a level of caution among buyers who are well aware of the vehicle's history and mechanics. Overall, the interaction shows a mix of admiration and necessary due diligence from interested parties.
Negative: Despite the glowing description, there are some hesitations regarding the truck's past and potential issues. Comments from @NateRussellSC and @dd9 raise questions about the consistent performance of features and common problems associated with this model. While @tesoffice is open about previous incidents, like the minor body ding from another vehicle, potential buyers still might view these as concerns, indicating a cautious approach to the purchase. @renew also inquired about having a mechanic inspect the truck, reflecting a careful consideration among buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @bmchan praised the vehicle for its stunning appearance, specifically noting love for the hardtop and wheels, which he personally has on his own car. @boaboyoz described the Porsche 996 C4 cabriolet as an exquisite example, expressing admiration for its Meridian Metallic color. Additionally, @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) emphasized their commitment to transparency in transactions, highlighting their impressive customer reviews and offering services like nationwide shipping and inspections.
Neutral: The seller, @Collectibleclassics, responded to inquiries regarding the vehicle's exhaust system, confirming that the exhausts are indeed stock X54. They also clarified that anything included in the listing is part of the sale, addressing questions about the wind deflector and its associated cost. However, they stated that they do not have records showing if the IMS bearing issue was addressed but provided resources for interested parties to educate themselves about the IMS situation.
Negative: @Deke29 raised concerns about the lack of information regarding the IMS bearing replacement when the clutch was changed in 2017, questioning if it was overlooked. @Justintime1969 and @Econman1 echoed similar inquiries about the IMS bearings, expressing frustration that the seller was not adequately addressing the issue despite its significance and potential cost implications. @Econman1 suggested that research indicates fewer cabriolets had the IMS issue, yet still deemed it a legitimate concern.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the 2018 Diesel Range Rover HSE. @quattro4snow complimented the vehicle's color combination and wheel choice, indicating a strong aesthetic appeal. @INTERCARUSA (The Seller) emphasized the luxury and smooth driving experience of the Range Rover, aiming to assure potential buyers of its high quality and additional features, further contributing to its positive perception. The vehicle is described as fully specced and includes options highlighted by the window sticker, which can ignite interest among potential bidders.
Neutral: A variety of inquiries about the vehicle's specifics were raised, with @ThewhippetsS5 asking for clarification on the car's location for viewing, showing interest but no clear stance on the purchase. @edcabad requested details about a past accident and the certification process without expressing a personal opinion, illustrating a typical buyer's due diligence. Other neutral comments included questions from @Rafematz regarding the timing belts, and @afmuro72 clarifying the service conditions due to the vehicle's mileage, reflecting practical concerns.
Negative: Some concerns were raised that could deter buyers. @edcabad pointed out the need for more information on a past accident, which might make potential buyers wary about the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @hue227's comments about the skid plate and missing panel suggest doubts about the vehicle's maintenance, indicating potential issues that require addressing. Though @Melia's inquiry about a possible seat tear was clarified by the seller, such comments could create hesitancy and highlight the scrutiny buyers often apply before committing to a significant purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Juggs44 appreciates the rarity of the 987.2 base with a manual transmission, noting it has no IMS or bore scoring worries. @Sid_Kafizz likes the vehicle's understated monochromatic look, specifically mentioning the distinctive Stone Grey upholstery. Further, @xtracrazi highlights the appeal of the ventilated seats which are a great feature for the interior, and @sdallasesq is impressed that the 987.2 feels surprisingly fast despite being a non-S model. Overall, many comments reflect a consensus that the vehicle is not only appealing but also has been very well maintained, as emphasized by @Collectibleclassics who showcases their commitment to transparency and detail in their listing.
Neutral: @MTH mentions the absence of the frunk trim, although they were reassured by @Collectibleclassics that there are no signs of bodywork on the Carfax report. @claytonadavis noted the comprehensiveness of the seller's listing and appreciated the imperfections video, while expressing curiosity about the over-rev log. Several commentors, including @Namtrop66 and @LincolnAMG, inquire about maintenance records and vehicle history, indicating a neutral stance while seeking more information to make decisions.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding missing trim pieces and the DME report. @MTH queried the lack of plastic trim around the frunk, suggesting it might have been damaged in an unreported accident. @extrafacet voiced concerns about a single ignition count in higher RPM ranges shown in the DME report. These inquiries reflect a cautious approach by potential buyers, as they seek reassurance regarding mechanical integrity and any possible past issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ElkManMi comments positively on the car's color, expressing enjoyment with a simple, "Nice color!". @boaboyoz also appreciates the Thunderbird's aesthetics, calling it a "delight" in its green and white color combination. @Skeneogden shares their experience with the vehicle, describing it as a "beautiful example" that has been lovingly cared for, with immaculate body, paint, and chrome. They mention receiving appreciative attention from passersby while driving it, enhancing the car's allure. @msmodugno adds to the positive feedback by relating their experiences as a member of the Southern California Thunderbird Club, noting that the car is very nice and that the winner of the auction would not be disappointed.
Neutral: Several commenters seek clarification on specific aspects of the car. @LW57 inquires about the original hardtop and soft top, questioning whether the soft top is the correct 57 model. @VincentTB asks about details that may not align with the original equipment or design. @artkopf expresses curiosity about a device he notices next to the shifter, prompting @birddoc to identify it as an anti-theft transmission lock, which the seller confirms. @Dyneema (The Seller) also responds to questions regarding the hardtop, soft top, radio functionality, and the color, indicating that the original hardtop is not included due to theft but providing the necessary details about the vehicle's maintenance and upgrades.
Negative: On the negative side, @NameTaken2 critiques the listing description, calling it too basic and expressing frustration with the lack of adequate documentation regarding the car's color, suggesting it should be credited more as "Sea Spray Green". @59turner humorously remarks on the car's small size compared to modern vehicles and how it can appear comical with larger passengers. @Skeneogden seems to cite a minor complaint about brake pressure, indicating that it requires more force than they are accustomed to, although admitting this is typical for cars of that era. Overall, there are hints of dissatisfaction regarding the completeness of the information provided about the car, causing some potential bidders to voice their concerns.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors praised the vehicle for its performance and overall enjoyment. @DaveTea noted that the SUV is a lot of fun, stating it constantly surprises him when he can borrow it from his wife, especially at highway speeds. @Speedy4 echoed this sentiment, mentioning that driving in sport mode adds to the fun experience. @Wob (The Seller) highlighted its appealing design, handling, and reliability, calling it a 'sweet spot' among SUVs and noting its low mileage and timeless color combination. Overall, the vehicle was described as great looking and ready for enjoyment.
Neutral: Several comments raised inquiries regarding the car's features and maintenance history. @RobertR91 asked if the car comes with two keys and requested information about the transfer case's service history. @rc7141664Lehner inquired if the vehicle would pass California emissions, to which @Wob (The Seller) confirmed it would come with a smog for California residents. @LawDog posed maintenance-related questions about the coolant pipes, transfer case, cardan shaft, air suspension, and brake fluid, indicating an interest in the vehicle's upkeep with a focus on transparency.
Negative: A few comments contained concerns and questions pertaining to potential issues and the accuracy of the information provided. @fmendler pointed out a need for correction in the vehicle's presentation about the clean CarFax. @LawDog also expressed apprehension about the known weak points of the 958 Turbo model, asking for detailed maintenance history to evaluate its condition. Overall, while the vehicle attracted positive attention, some commentors remained cautious and sought further information on maintenance matters.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Guiling (The Seller) emphasizes the excellent condition of the motorcycle, highlighting that it comes with both the original keys and fobs along with the factory exhaust system and air cleaner. The seller expresses confidence in the bike's quality, stating that it runs like new and has only 1100 miles on it. The original owner parked the bike in a garage for over 20 years after purchasing it, indicating that the motorcycle has been well-preserved. @Guiling conveys an enthusiastic tone, stating that potential buyers will not be disappointed and believes the bike's beauty is not fully captured in the pictures.
Neutral: @Jimm1900 requests a riding or driving video of the motorcycle for a better assessment of its performance. @Guiling acknowledges the request but informs that they are currently out of town, suggesting that it won't be possible to provide the video before the auction ends. However, the seller reassures potential buyers about the bike's superb running condition, stating that they have ridden it without any issues, which adds some clarity to @Jimm1900's inquiry.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle in the provided information. @Guiling appears to have addressed all questions and concerns positively, ensuring that potential buyers are informed about the bike's state and expressing regret for not being able to provide a video due to their absence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle for its excellent condition and low mileage, showcasing it as a beautiful cruising Corvette. @topduarte described the car as a 'very nice cruising vette', while @Aubrey noted that it has brand new tires and everything works as it should, highlighting a positive perspective on the overall quality of the vehicle. @ValSparks expressed admiration for the car's stylish look, appreciating the combination of its elements, and another user reflected on the attractiveness of the C4's saw blades and white exterior.
Neutral: @Aubrey provided details about the auction process and encouraged bidders to inspect the vehicle during the auction period, emphasizing the importance of pre-approved funds before bidding. The seller also made an effort to clarify comments about the vehicle’s features, such as discussing the type of seats and confirming it has standard seats rather than sport seats, while also mentioning that all vehicles are sold as-is, which aligns with the usual practice on auction platforms.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the age of the tires, with @ValSparks questioning if they were indeed from 2005, and @DGK55 corrected the initial description regarding the seating. Both points suggest that although the car may be in good condition, potential buyers should verify specific details, particularly about the tires and seat types, which could affect their decision to bid. Overall, there is a hint of skepticism regarding the car's actual state given its age, showing that not all aspects of the vehicle were perceived as fully transparent.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @cpa713 loves the color combination of steel blue on gray, praising the vehicle's stunning condition. @2002WS6 notes that the BMW 330 Ci Convertible is a great car, highlighting how it has less plastic under the hood compared to newer models. They express a preference for this car over their own 2011 BMW 328XI and wish good luck with the auction.
Neutral: @ANTHEMAVM (The Seller) shared details about the history and condition of the BMW, explaining that it was previously owned by a woman who cherished it and was rarely driven afterward. The Seller has taken meticulous care of the vehicle, cleaning it thoroughly, performing maintenance, and making minor modifications for safety. They invite bidders to view and test drive the car, emphasizing its great driving experience and the passion put into maintaining it to its original state.
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @john_chamorro describes the vehicle as very nice, stating that he finds the Cougar to be much more attractive than the Mustang, noting they are just a little fancier. @svatem enthusiastically comments about enjoying the sunny weather with the right kind of drive and the correct number of pedals. @gccch highlights the impressive M code engine as the standout feature of the car, expressing surprise that it didn't come with a Hurst shifter, as seen in later years. @thatsakillerpiece appreciates the vehicle's collection of factory original hot rod parts and the convertible top, referring to it as a time capsule. @Bmisk19 (The Seller) welcomes bidders and shares the history of the car, emphasizing its rarity and his personal joy in owning it despite the need for garage space for a new family car.
Neutral: The comments include technical specifications about the engine, noting that the M code 351 Windsor engine was rated at 290 HP with a 10.7 compression ratio in 1969, and that it features a factory 4-speed manual transmission and a 3.25 locking rear differential. @Bassettclassics sees lots of potential in the vehicle. @CarFoolLane compliments the seller's efforts to restore the stock steering wheel, appreciating its return to a classy original state. @Bmisk19 (The Seller) details the journey of restoring parts, including the difficulty in finding specific trim pieces and bumper guard cores before securing some NOS ones on eBay, which are also included with the car.
Negative: @CougarBarn questions whether the car retains its factory paint or has been repainted at some point, hinting at a concern over the originality of the vehicle's aesthetic. @Bmisk19 (The Seller) clarifies that the car has factory paint, although a replacement was made on the passenger fender at some time. @EddieNap makes a more abstract comment about liking the VIN numbers, which doesn't directly reflect any issues with the vehicle but may suggest a quirky angle rather than genuine interest in performance or aesthetic.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting its unique features such as the rare 6-Speed manual transmission and the attractive color combination of Silver Grey Metallic over Imola Red. @e9er highlighted the car's superior appeal while @CaddyNelson appreciated the mention of the 'Big 3' automotive brands in the auction listing. Many commenters recognized the extensive service records and maintenance performed on the car, which enhances its value and desirability to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries and clarifications were made regarding specific aspects of the vehicle, including the upgrades to the VANOS system, the presence of clearcoat lift, and the status of the OEM headlights. @zipster21 and @Segura911 posed questions about minor imperfections and modifications, which @TheChosenWon (The Seller) addressed with transparency. Discussions also included the condition of the headliner, with @Carnut4ever suggesting improvements to increase the car’s appeal in a competitive market.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition were raised, particularly relating to the headliner and the lack of detailed history regarding an earlier minor accident. @Carnut4ever voiced thoughts on how repairing the headliner could enhance the car's marketing potential, while @Delfs-Haven questioned the costs of repairs. Additionally, commentators like @fbi_sam expressed opinions that the car would be more appealing with a different exterior color, indicating that aesthetic preferences could influence buyers' interest.
![]() |
20×9.5″ and 21×12″ Wheels for Porsche 992 GT3
Set of Four Porsche GT3 Wheels
Lot 204164
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the authenticity and quality of the wheels being sold. @Biffbelf, the seller, confirms that these are indeed OEM factory wheels removed from a GT3 992.1, and reassures potential buyers about their excellent condition, stating there are no nicks or dings. Furthermore, @Biffbelf expresses willingness to package and ship the wheels at the buyer's cost, which adds to the positive perception of the transaction. @vange77 also praises the seller’s 911 turbo S, reflecting well on the trustworthiness of @Biffbelf.
Neutral: Several inquiries about the wheels denote a keen interest in their specifications and compatibility. @pat_martin and @uncleben ask about the fitting for different Porsche models, while @Riyad2004 requests confirmation on whether the wheels are indeed OEM and factory painted. @Dtheriault's question regarding the inclusion of TPMS indicates a practical concern for potential buyers. These comments show that buyers are actively seeking clarification but do not express strong emotions either way about the product itself.
Negative: There are some concerns reflected in the comments, particularly from @marc33 who inquires about potential imperfections, showing a level of suspicion or caution about the product's condition. Additionally, the disagreement between wheel compatibility for models 991.1 and 992.1 raised by @uncleben could deter certain buyers who may own the former model and are looking for a suitable fit.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @RMQ333 expressed admiration for the Tropical Turquoise color and loves the wagon 2-door conversion, while @RidleysRides commented on the impressive size of the side windows and added it to their dream car garage. @Highlander63 compared the vehicle favorably to iconic models like the 55 Nomad and the 1965 Chevelle, highlighting the vehicle's good condition and appealing aesthetics. @ssterry referred to it as a bad a$ American shooting brake, and @onlyhonda4me noted its coolness, emphasizing the sentiments of preserving manuals and wagons.
In terms of neutral feedback, several commenters asked technical questions regarding the vehicle specifications and features. @vovoguy raised concerns about the structural integrity given the C pillars' removal, while @daddio211 inquired about the rear axle ratio's highway cruising capability. @points-n-condenser questioned the specifics of the 4-speed transmission and the absence of a power steering pump, receiving thorough replies from @Guardian_Auto (The Seller) regarding transmission details and manual steering characteristics. Additionally, @TurboChris sought clarification on the pin striping and whether it had been cleared over, receiving an informative response that the pinstriping was not cleared.
Conversely, some comments were negative, with @greg2002 criticizing the initial driving video quality, stating it was among the worst they had seen. @dbgaul echoed concerns about the driving video, noting it didn't showcase the power band adequately due to short shifting. Additionally, @MakeItGoBrrrrrr questioned the vehicle’s functionality of air conditioning and @Lowlowe expressed concerns about rear seat belts for children. Despite these critiques, most commenters retained a positive outlook on the overall vehicle aesthetic and appeal, urging for additional video content to showcase its capabilities better.
Neutral:
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @P992G911 comments on the vehicle's appealing specifications and expresses admiration for the floor mats, suggesting they could be tuxmats. @joexray77 also notes the car's impressive example, highlighting the wheels and their rarity, elaborating on the various wheel choices available from the factory. @Troonp shares a positive reflection, indicating the car is well presented and acknowledges its special status as a supercar from personal experience.
Neutral: @Troonp and @Joexray77 collectively discuss the wheels, noting the previous factory wheel option and the cost differences of the current accessory wheels. @The_Dude_Abides expresses mixed feelings about the aesthetics of the wheels but agrees on the ability to change the floor mats easily. The discussion reflects a range of opinions on the wheel design while recognizing the overall quality of the vehicle.
Negative: @BinaryFyre opens the door to criticism by claiming the driving video associated with the auction is the worst they've seen, suggesting a lack of quality or professionalism. @uestvega raises a concern regarding an open recall that is reportedly unaddressed, a risky factor for potential buyers. @Mithras1111 counters @joexray77's assertion about the weight of the Y-spoke wheels, adding to the debate around the vehicle's specifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors express admiration for the vehicle's color and overall appearance, describing it as a beautiful and well-maintained truck. @fnd3rd specifically appreciates the dually configuration for long-haul towing, underlining its utility despite not having an off-road package. @HuntBuck7 also acknowledges the truck's upkeep, suggesting it looks very well taken care of.
Neutral: The seller, @AYeakey, responds to inquiries regarding service records, indicating that the only documentation available is a CarFax report. They explain that a state inspection was performed and detail some mechanical replacements made prior to sale, such as the power side mirror switch. There are discussions about towing capabilities, including clarification about the former fifth wheel hitch provisions and the location of the 100-gallon tank, contributing to an informative dialogue about the truck's specifications.
Negative: Some potential buyers, like @Airlink and @57shaker, express concerns regarding the lack of maintenance records, which are often crucial for assessing the vehicle's history and reliability. The absence of a fifth wheel hitch also raises questions for those interested in towing, indicating a potential drawback for buyers prioritizing complete towing packages. Additionally, there is a mention of maintenance receipts that are not available, further causing apprehension about the truck's service history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @King95 praised the vehicle, stating it ticks all the boxes and described it as a wonderful car. @Pyrate expressed satisfaction with the service history and commented on the nice specifications of the vehicle, conveying a positive outlook. Additionally, @rosenblumj confirmed that everything runs great and provided a video of the vehicle, which @AntGTO appreciated, indicating confidence in the vehicle's functionality.
Neutral: @Fermgnz inquired about the number of keys available for the vehicle, which @rosenblumj clarified by stating that there are two keys. @GW.Huffalo asked about the specifics of the 40K service and the status of the plugs and coils, with @rosenblumj responding that this information can be found in the invoice among the listing photos. The discussion kept a neutral tone as both parties sought clarification rather than expressing strong opinions.
Negative: @NoSpeedLimits expressed disappointment that the vehicle falls short of their preferences due to lacking power seats. @Twt raised concerns regarding discrepancies between the console features, specifically the PSE, and the paperwork, leading to confusion about its installation status. This reflects a lack of confidence in the integrity of the vehicle's documentation, while @Bodybag speculated on possible package inclusions to explain the inconsistency.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the aesthetic appeal of the MINI, with @Mayjer calling it a "Nice looking MINI!" and @WookieeRookie expressing admiration by stating, "WOW! Maybe the perfect Mini!" Several users, including @Super7Driver and @wishful, remarked on the MINI's cheeky stance, wheels, and retro features, indicating a strong appreciation for its design. @Automark highlighted the 'backdating stuff' that added to the car's charm, while @Silverarrowauto (The Seller) endorsed the vehicle's performance enhancements and overall reliability, particularly mentioning its upgraded features like air conditioning and a refreshed paint job.
Neutral: There were some neutral comments regarding the performance of the engine that sparked discussion. @Vintageant questioned the horsepower output of a 1995 fuel-injected 1300cc engine compared to the earlier models, prompting thoughtful responses from others, including @1071S, who explained the differences in engine design and regulatory influences over the years. @Silverarrowauto (The Seller) engaged positively with questions from potential buyers, expressing willingness to provide additional information and updates on the vehicle's condition and answering inquiries about the wipers and rust assessments.
Negative: On the downside, some concerns were raised regarding minor issues with the MINI. @billybackstay inquired about the ground wire, possibly signaling a concern over the car's electrical setup, and @Rockndawg asked about potential minor rust spots and fluid leaks, which suggests caution on the condition of the vehicle. Furthermore, @wishful and others pointed out areas that may display corrosion based on photo evidence, though @Silverarrowauto (The Seller) clarified that the issues were superficial paint peeling rather than serious rust.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express interest in the vehicle and one, @Gearhed64, praises the 3-Wheeled Elsinore, claiming it was the 'King of 250s'. The seller, @alerony, engages positively with interested remarks, detailing the situation surrounding the bike and providing links to past videos showcasing it running.
Neutral: @adamc69 poses critical questions about the vehicle's history, expressing curiosity about why it was purchased in California, shipped to Florida, and subsequently stored without use. @PowerSource seeks clarification on the vehicle's location for pick-up, which @alerony confirms as Florida. @lotissi inquires about the availability of spare tires, suggesting ongoing interest in the bike's condition and parts.
Negative: Some concerns arise about the bike's long period of inactivity, as @adamc69 mentions it has not run for eight months. The seller's comments about not having recent video evidence of the bike running also raise doubts regarding its current condition. The general atmosphere suggests uncertainty about the bike's reliability after its prolonged storage.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @lrhaw (The Seller) provides detailed information about the truck, including restoration efforts and maintenance history, which many commenters appreciated. The seller mentions having new parts from reputable suppliers and even offers to share color codes and receipts from the restoration, indicating transparency and a willingness to address potential buyer concerns. Additionally, the seller has made efforts to upload driving videos as requested by @mrbc711 and others, showcasing the truck's operational state.
Neutral: Several commenters are seeking clarification on different aspects of the vehicle, such as @Pklg's inquiry about the mileage and the history of the vehicle since 1986. Questions regarding the aftermarket Oregon Assigned Identification Number from @Bluse and safety compliance details from @JMart56 reflect a common interest in the truck's legitimacy and condition. @major’s request for further information about the vehicle’s condition highlights the desire for buyers to know exactly what they are dealing with before making a decision.
Negative: There are concerns raised by various commenters regarding the vehicle's functionality, particularly about the non-working exterior lights mentioned by @rancherman. @Major addresses the potential issues related to the fuel tank, 4x4 system, and possible leaks from the rear differential, prompting further questions about the overall mechanical condition of the truck. The seller acknowledges some problems, like the need for a replacement antenna and paint, but this acknowledgment raises concerns about additional undiscovered issues that might need attention.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, highlighting its condition and the owner's dedication to maintenance over the years. @jbcarfan (The Seller) has owned the 1992 E31 850i 6-Speed for 13 years and shared his commitment to upkeep through extensive personal maintenance, which earned admiration from others. Commenters such as @youngclassics referred to the car as a nice example, and @itsshnowin conveyed respect for the seller's care and the hope that the next owner would continue this tradition. Several commenters noted that these cars are undervalued, with @GermanCarDude likening them to classic models like the Testarossa.
Neutral: The vehicle has gone through several maintenance improvements, and @jbcarfan (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the car's modifications and maintenance history. He provided insight into the differential swap undertaken by the previous owner, which many identified as a common upgrade for improved performance. Commenters requested more details on various aspects of the car, such as underbody condition and exhaust systems, and @jbcarfan provided assurances of the vehicle's soundness with no visible rust while attempting to accommodate their requests for additional photos.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about minor issues with the vehicle. The passenger door operates intermittently, requiring some care to open, and @jbcarfan acknowledged this but indicated there is a repair kit available. Additionally, a slight hiccup in the second gear synchro and a minor leak in the steering gear during winter were mentioned; however, @jbcarfan assured potential buyers that these were not significant problems. Overall, while there are minor flaws associated with aging, the seller maintains confidence in the car's overall performance and condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its appealing color combination and nostalgic value. For instance, @dhoeger mentioned loving the color combo, while @Siowner praised the car's nice condition and noted that it retains its original color and engine. @macroni indicated excitement over the auction, calling the vehicle a very nice example. Additionally, @jjblbi reflected fondly on the car, describing it as a 'great car from simpler times' and appreciating the surrounding scenery in the restoration photos.
Neutral: Some comments focused on clarifications regarding the vehicle's history and features. @EandR (The Seller) addressed questions about the headliner, indicating that new fabric for it would be included in the sale. They also confirmed that the engine's numbers match the Certificate of Authenticity, reassuring potential bidders about the vehicle's authenticity. @bringatrailer provided insight about the bidding process, reminding bidders to verify their bid amounts carefully to avoid confusion, while @Lord_Balfour_IV acknowledged the vehicle's potential despite the condition of its seats.
Negative: On the downside, there were concerns raised about the vehicle's condition. @zeres pointed out that despite an engine overhaul, there seemed to be an excessive amount of oil on the engine and suggested signs of rust that could indicate a history of exposure to harsh winter conditions. They even questioned how the car would fare in terms of bids due to these issues. Another commenter, @Bordeaux, raised questions about the car's engine and chassis number discrepancies, hinting at potential restoration challenges. Overall, these negative remarks indicate a level of skepticism among potential buyers about the car's condition and history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @AlbertaBoy shared a fun nostalgic story about a similar 1972 Corvette, highlighting the unique side pipes of the vehicle, which were a topic of fascination. @onlinems praised the build quality and noted the inclusion of lots of expensive hardware, which adds to the overall appeal of the vehicle. @Cmoneymillz expressed personal nostalgia for the 1982 model, appreciating the modifications made to enhance its handling, and noted a desire for a driving video to see its performance in action.
Neutral: @gearhead767 (The Seller) confirmed that the AC system functions properly and provided information about the side pipes, noting they aren't overwhelmingly loud during light acceleration. They also clarified that the car is registered in Florida as an antique, which allows for ease of ownership. Several commenters asked about various specifications, including horsepower, handling, and paint condition, and @gearhead767 (The Seller) provided detailed answers to these inquiries, suggesting the car has been well-maintained with newer components.
Negative: @pethoward raised concerns about the paint condition and imperfections, questioning the overall quality of the work done on the vehicle, while @Dragonsk824 inquired about an old loan or lien on the car, which potentially raised red flags about its ownership history. @serra101 also brought up questions regarding any potential restrictions in using the car as a daily driver, particularly under its antique registration status, leading to some uncertainty about its practical use.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @flightning1 praised the vehicle's appearance with a simple but enthusiastic 'NICE!', while @Tom_S. complimented the aesthetic appeal of the bike, particularly in white. @jmilo53 expressed admiration for the Honda 350, highlighting the striking white paint against the black wheels and lauding its impressive redline. @militarydave35 found the bike to be a clean option, prompting curiosity about its suitability for beginners. Furthermore, @fortheloveofcars reminisced about the smooth nature of the motor, expressing this model as his favorite due to its enjoyable riding experience, which leads to 'smiles per mile'. Overall, the comments reflect a genuine appreciation for the bike's design and ride quality, positioning it as a beloved machine in the motorcycle community.
Neutral: The seller, @desrtdog, provided detailed information about the bike's history and its technical specifications, explaining that this is a 1974 Honda CB350 Four, Honda's smallest inline 4-cylinder bike. He noted that the bike, while not completely original, is a worthwhile specimen that offers fun for the new owner. Throughout the auction process, @desrtdog encouraged interaction, assuring potential bidders that he would respond to queries. He also mentioned practicalities such as the auction's end time, the bike's weight, and dimensions to assist buyers in making informed decisions about their bids.
Negative: Some comments brought up minor concerns as well. @jmilo53 queried about the stock cables and a perceived discoloration in one of the exhaust pipes, leading to a discussion about potential adjustments for personal comfort. @militarydave35 raised a question regarding the ignition system's antiquated technology, voicing uncertainty about whether it would suit a beginner. @jmilo53 also noticed possible smoke from the pipes during cold starts, to which @desrtdog attributed it to condensation, a common issue that resolves once the engine warms up. Overall, the feedback highlights some uncertainties and technical questions that potential buyers may have about the bike, suggesting areas for further clarification.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The responses highlight the vehicle's impressive features and condition, with many users expressing admiration for its aesthetics and performance. @Grampisatitagain (The Seller) mentions the car's beautiful color combination and reassures potential buyers about its cleanliness, stating that no one has ever smoked in it and that there are no pets associated with it. Additionally, the automatic transmission receives praise from @Double for providing considerably quicker acceleration compared to a manual, and @Gunners4Life suggests the car looks great, even with the automatic option. Furthermore, @Grampisatitagain emphasizes the accessibility of the car for drivers of all skill levels, highlighting memories made with family while driving it.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about the car's specifications and features, indicating a general interest in understanding more about the vehicle's capabilities. @apntra asks whether the gold stripes are painted or taped and also raises a question about smog compliance, to which @Grampisatitagain confirms the original Shelby tape stripes and reassures that it meets 50 state emission requirements. Comments also reflect an appreciation for the vehicle's technical aspects, such as the horsepower rating, with @apntra asking for this information, and the seller providing that it has 480HP and is prepared for a supercharger upgrade if desired.
Negative: A few comments convey skepticism, particularly regarding the automatic transmission. @Gunners4Life humorously voices a preference for a manual transmission, implying a belief that it may offer a better driving experience. @apntra's query about whether the stripes are painted or taped may suggest a concern about the vehicle's authenticity or aesthetic quality. Nevertheless, @Grampisatitagain (The Seller) responds positively to inquiries, reinforcing the car's value and appealing attributes, which could alleviate some concerns raised.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @nexusautobrokers praises the specification of the vehicle, noting it resembles their own while lacking the carbon ceramic brakes, calling the M3s in manual transmission 'AMAZING.' @Eli93 expresses excitement over the vehicle's black on black aesthetic, describing it as 'nothing missing here.' @Fons226 shares their positive experience with a similar model, referring to this generation of M3 as one of the last beautiful designs of M cars, wishing good luck to both the seller and the prospective buyer.
Neutral: @SRT202 (The Seller) responds to comments regarding features such as CarPlay, clarifying that it is indeed included, and mentions the presence of OEM protection film on only the rear wheel fenders, indicating that there is no paint protection film on the vehicle. Additionally, @SRT202 addresses inquiries from @tlzhp about ownership and clarifies the situation regarding the mileage by explaining that the car was re-titled when they moved, providing answers to questions about the condition of the leather and availability of documentation.
Negative: @Ravieck raises a concern about the vehicle being towed into the dealership, which @SRT202 quickly clears up by stating that the car was transported in an enclosed trailer and has never been towed. @Icebiker points out a discrepancy about the rims and brakes, emphasizing that the rims are 666 but suggesting the brakes are not carbon ceramic, indicating a lack of clarity around the specifications of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Boatymcboatface praised the vehicle, noting its mid-western origins as a convertible, highlighting that it has never been driven in winter and was garaged, which suggests it has been well cared for. The comment emphasized the appeal of owning such a car, particularly pointing out that they are generally owned by affluent individuals who maintain their high-value toys meticulously. They expressed optimism about the value of the 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabriolet on the market.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) provided detailed updates on the vehicle, confirming that issues such as fluid leaks have been addressed with replacements and repairs, including updates to the transmission plug and the top pump. They also mentioned the overall quality of the vehicle, describing it as an impressive hand-built 5.4 Liter V8 Convertible. In addition, they highlighted that they have a high rating based on customer reviews and that inspections are welcomed for potential buyers, helping to build trust around the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @jeffs3820 raised concerns about previous fluid leaks from the last listing and inquired whether there was a repair bill for those issues. @jpschmidt87 questioned the condition of the engine mounts given the vehicle's age and the torque from the engine, implying there could be potential undisclosed issues. @iangail expressed skepticism about potential disappointment upon receipt of the car, asking the seller to assure that there wouldn't be any unforeseen problems after the purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Downtown described the vehicle as beautiful, while @johnjm praised the engine dress-up as a great job. @GLWTA, a comment from Erioc, noted the modern drivability of the car alongside its classic charm, expressing admiration for the impressive colors and the complete restoration. @boaboyoz echoed these sentiments, calling the Series 61 Club Coupe a fantastic and scintillating specimen. @billyblyth provided insight into the historical context of the car, acknowledging its evolution into later models and commending the intelligent modifications for comfort and cruising.
Neutral: The seller, @wcclassics, provided comprehensive details about the car's features, enhancements, and restoration process. They confirmed the vehicle's significant upgrades, including the LS3 engine and modern suspension components, and noted the efforts toward an aesthetically and mechanically sound build. They also invited further inquiries about the vehicle and welcomed inspections, stating that a video showcasing the car is forthcoming and detailing its cosmetic and mechanical condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's restored salvage title. @MatrixMotorsports inquired about its history regarding previous restoration and vin replacement. @WhiteyP and @smaconi voiced concerns regarding the implications of the salvage title on registration in their states, wanting assurance that there would not be issues when attempting to title the car. @wcclassics responded to these inquiries, emphasizing that the vehicle had undergone an important inspection process to earn its restored salvage designation, ensuring it meets state requirements for roadworthy status.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @genevamotorcars (The Seller) provided details about the vehicle, emphasizing its great condition and rarity. They highlighted that the car can achieve impressive fuel efficiency, stating it can do upper 30s on the road if driven under 75 mph, making it an appealing option for potential buyers. Another positive comment from @genevamotorcars (The Seller) noted that the paint, seats, and interior are all in excellent shape, showcasing the care that has been taken with the vehicle.
Neutral: @n8sfavtoy expressed surprise about the existence of a diesel F-Pace in the U.S., which adds an interesting layer to the conversation about this vehicle’s specifications. Although they wished @genevamotorcars (The Seller) good luck with the sale, they did mention that the asking price is slightly above their budget, reflecting a typical concern for potential buyers regarding pricing and affordability.
Negative: @guftring raised specific questions regarding the vehicle's condition, inquiring about the paint, tires, and seats. This suggests some concern about wear and tear that potential buyers may have before making a purchase. Although @genevamotorcars (The Seller) reassured them about the vehicle's condition, the initial questions indicate that some buyers may be worried about the car's overall wear.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @KawaZmoto describes the vehicle as a "red hot beauty," highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @weim55 complimented the restoration of the truck, mentioning the unique wheels that give it a standout look, and expressed enthusiasm about the overall beauty of the restoration, calling it a real head-turner. The seller, @WarehouseMotors, emphasizes the truck's features and restoration, inviting potential buyers to appreciate its details through the provided gallery of photos.
Neutral: @Wheels8 inquired about the bed length of the truck and whether a 4x8 sheet of plywood could fit flat with the tailgate closed, revealing practical considerations potential buyers may have. @weim55 provided clarifications regarding the bed length, stating that it's a 3/4 ton model with an 87-inch bed, thus not fitting the modern standard for a "long bed." @WarehouseMotors confirmed the bed length as 7.5 feet, while also acknowledging the lack of paperwork regarding the wheel modifications makes it more challenging for potential buyers looking for specifics.
Negative: Some concerns emerged regarding the lack of restoration paperwork, which could be a deal-breaker for buyers wanting detailed knowledge about the modifications made to the vehicle. @Manderthal's question about the axle type reflects curiosity about the vehicle's mechanical aspects, indicating that buyers may want to ensure they are getting a well-maintained and properly upgraded machine. @WarehouseMotors remains unable to provide comprehensive details on certain aspects, which may leave potential bidders feeling uncertain.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the vehicle's beautiful craftsmanship and overall excellent condition. @Mater21 (The Seller) emphasizes that the Corsair was not a 'kit' car, but rather a hand-built vehicle made with high-quality materials like a steel body, stainless steel brightwork, and luxurious leather interiors. Commenters like @rollsroyce appreciate its appearance, while @PaulEZ and others mention its appealing design. Overall, the car is described as very well built, which assures potential bidders of the quality and care put into its production.
Neutral: Several inquiries about specific specifications indicate general interest in the vehicle's components and historical context. @UscPhd97_ asks about the AC system, while @TedLitvin and @Fleche_dOr raise questions regarding emissions and previous ownership. @Mater21 (The Seller) addresses these questions thoughtfully, providing details about the car's history and stating that it was registered in Texas under a unique VIN due to its custom build. Additional comments suggest confusion or curiosity about the production background of the vehicle, such as whether it was originally sold as a kit or a complete car.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the vehicle's regulatory compliance and historical details. @TedLitvin questions why the car would fail California smog regulations and mentions the brief ownership history, which raises a red flag for potential buyers. @wastedrubber and @Fleche_dOr express confusion about the classification of the vehicle as a 'kit car' versus a 'component car,' insinuating a lack of clarity in the marketing of the car. Additionally, doubts about documentation and whether it was built with a manufacturer’s warranty might lead some bidders to hesitate.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The GMC K1500 4x4 High Sierra is presented by @WAGroup with enthusiasm, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and pride of ownership over the years. The seller expresses a willingness to accommodate buyers through international transport options and offers storage within reason. The vehicle has been described as needing only minor details to reach perfection, indicating that it is generally in good condition and well-maintained.
Neutral: Commenters have pointed out some inconsistencies regarding the vehicle's identification, specifically regarding its front clip resembling a Chevrolet. @crustymechanic and @trymene1 engage in a discussion to clarify these misconceptions, with @WAGroup confirming the truck's GMC title. Requests for additional information about the vehicle, including alignment status and operational aspects like lights and windows, were made by @Thereddevil, suggesting a thorough interest in the truck's mechanics and features.
Negative: There are several concerns raised about the truck, particularly regarding its authenticity and condition. Comments from @MalibusMostWanted indicate skepticism about its classification as a GMC, while @dejis inquires about the original factory specifications regarding wheels. Additionally, @1979K30Chevy raises questions about potential bondo use and the vehicle's performance at higher speeds, reflecting some doubt about its overall reliability and the degree of modifications it may have undergone.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @rmorin49 describes the vehicle as a "truck lovers holy Grail," indicating high praise for its desirability. @CoyoteJoe shares their positive experience, stating they love their TRX and recommend purchasing a radar detector to enhance the overall driving experience. @FBCB also reiterates their fondness for the truck, confirming its greatness while noting specific features like the option for ventilated seats.
Neutral: Questions have been raised regarding certain features and specifications of the vehicle. @autorama inquires about the presence of ventilated seats, to which @FBCB speculates that they may be included in a higher package version of the truck. Additionally, @Yvan requests the production date of the vehicle, which is provided by @genevamotorcars (The Seller) as 2/2021.
Negative: Concerns are expressed regarding missing information about the vehicle's capabilities. @speedsterdan requests a photo of the window sticker for transparency on options and features. Furthermore, @rboladian asks about the towing capacity, indicating that it may not have been specified, which could be a crucial factor for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mgardner2366 praised the vehicle for its beautiful appearance and great color combination, inquiring if it has a panorama roof. @roysauto echoed this sentiment by sharing their positive experience with a similar model, calling the vehicle awesome. @Arch88 confirmed the car's beautiful color and noted that the window sticker identifies the Panorama Roof, further enhancing the vehicle's appeal. @BigGar commented on the stunning silver and Bordeaux interior, labeling it as a beautiful example. @KP777 also mentioned the car's good condition and low miles for a 2009 model, highlighting the excellent purchase potential.
Neutral: Several users asked clarifying questions regarding the vehicle. @azdgordon inquired about the Sony touchscreen head unit's functionality and details, wanting to know if it has navigation and how other controls are managed, along with the functioning of the A/C system. @Dervus pointed out a clicking sound during a driving video and asked if any issues with the steering wheel controls had been addressed. Comments reflected the interest in the car's mechanical details and functionality, with many users awaiting further information from @Collectibleclassics, the seller.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's history and potential issues. @nixter23 questioned why the car was back on sale so quickly after being purchased. @VincentTB was apprehensive about the implications of the car having six previous owners and potential roof mechanism problems. @Skates15 shared similar worries about the quick resale. @NationalSuperbike expressed anxiety about the high number of owners, reflecting common apprehensions about reliability and ownership issues associated with cars of this nature.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters have praised the vehicle's stunning looks and specifications, with @boaboyoz calling it a 'scintillating C2 split-window coupe' and emphasizing its exquisite quality. @JimmoVette noted that despite the color change, the car is a beautiful example that is likely to attract a high price when sold. @Vinlsol echoed this sentiment, expressing admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, particularly in Silver Blue, describing it as 'Absolutely Gorgeous!!!!'.
Neutral: There were discussions about the vehicle's specifications regarding horsepower and engine identification. @Longforlineup suggested that the seller should post a picture of the engine pad for verification, while @a990dna and @MartyKC shared their thoughts on the estimated horsepower, creating a sense of speculation around the car’s performance. @Howard62 inquired about additional content like driving videos and the functionality of gauges, indicating interest in more details about the car's condition.
Negative: Some comments highlighted concerns about the lack of information regarding the engine. @Noisyboyz pointed out that the BaT staff should inform the seller to provide engine specifications for Corvette purists. @JimmoVette also expressed disappointment over the car's color change, suggesting it detracted from its original appeal. Furthermore, @MartyKC mentioned the lack of communication regarding tagging him in comments, which might detract from the overall engagement about the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received overwhelmingly positive remarks regarding its stunning build quality and unique features. @boaboyoz praised its eye-catching 'Nightmist Blue' color, describing the Bronco as 'looking very, very nice' and 'seriously cool.' @buybid22 (The Seller) highlighted the impressive construction and aesthetics of the vehicle, emphasizing both its top-notch professional build and stellar appearance in person. Many comments express excitement about the overall look and functionality of the Bronco, indicating that it catches the eye of quite a few potential buyers.
Neutral: The inquiries about the vehicle indicate a range of interests and functional considerations. @stevenbrooten questioned what it would take to register such a vehicle in California, showcasing a potential concern for buyers in specific states. @1936fred asked whether a stock hardtop would fit the vehicle, reflecting a practical concern about compatibility with additional accessories. @Buzz52 inquired about the vehicle's power steering and tire options, indicating a desire for practical details from interested buyers. These comments suggest that while the vehicle is impressive, there are logistical considerations for potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments expressed hesitation, particularly regarding the vehicle's price point and specific features. @Molae65 noted they found the vehicle 'absolutely gorgeous' but could 'do without the barnwood,' suggesting that not all elements of the build are appealing to everyone. Additionally, a comment from @Twinibago was flagged as non-constructive, indicating that not all feedback was well-received or considered relevant. These negative points show that while there is significant admiration for the vehicle, there are also challenges that it faces in terms of buyer perception and preferences.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, with @Slrappaport calling it a "beauty" and wishing it "GLWS" (Good Luck With Sale). @nkochary praised the rear design of the 7.2 911, claiming it has the best look among all generations of the 911. @2doors shared positive sentiment from their own experience with a similar model, describing it as the "ideal GTS spec" and also wishing the seller luck with the sale. @theporschehunters referred to the car as a "beauty" and highlighted its special qualities, indicating a strong emotional connection to the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments provided insights into the car's features and aftermarket elements. @CCHampton mentioned that the sport design side skirts might be a Porsche option rather than aftermarket, while @Charleetuner added that the side skirts could be factory painted body color, noting that various models have different options. @Icecreammatt observed that previous auction listings had included a picture of the window sticker displaying factory options, and @No-subt2 inquired whether there is a DME report available for potential buyers, suggesting a level of interest in the car's documentation.
Negative: Some comments hinted at modifications that users feel could enhance the car's performance. @Lesr3204 suggested removing the cats and mufflers to make the car louder, implying dissatisfaction with its current sound levels. Although generally positive, the need for such modifications might suggest that some buyers feel the factory setup could be improved. Additionally, @VT_Blue's question about the ease of removing the side skirts indicates a concern over customization options that may not have a straightforward solution.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Overall, the comments reflect a strong admiration for the vehicle being auctioned. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) highlights its impeccable condition with superb interiors and a flawless exterior that has been carefully maintained with PPF since day one. Commenters like @JDB1 praise the vehicle not only for its beautiful aesthetics but also commend the engaging driving video provided. @sitzlejd shares their positive experience with their own Evora, noting its unique qualities, such as being a mid-engine sports car with practicality that makes it a great value for enthusiasts. The excitement for this specific Evora is palpable, with many expressing confidence in its maintenance and performance.
Neutral: Several commenters bring attention to specific mechanical aspects of the vehicle, particularly regarding the transmission. @SqueekerSD inquires about potential issues with the 4th and 5th gears, to which @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) reassures that the current shifting is smooth and emphasizes that many Evoras operate well into high mileage without problems. Commenters acknowledge the varying opinions about the transmission's reliability, with @sitzlejd suggesting that the concerns may stem from exaggerated tales on online forums rather than consistent, real-world issues. This highlights the dichotomy between anecdotal evidence and user experiences, without definitive conclusions being drawn about the mechanical integrity of the vehicle.
Negative: There are some concerns raised about the potential for transmission failures in early Evoras, with @Daspyda and @donour emphasizing the known high failure rate among certain serial numbers. @jruiz116 notes the presence of what appears to be paint chips, which @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) attributes to peeling PPF, attempting to maintain transparency. While several users like @sitzlejd defend the model and its reliability, the discourse reveals a contentious atmosphere surrounding the transmission topic, with some feeling that the fears may be overstated. Nonetheless, the consensus on the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and driving enjoyment remains largely positive.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the car's history and performance. @eskothomson noted how cool it is that the vehicle is street legal and praised its presence at car meets, stating that it often receives positive attention from the public. @Silverplate commented on the car's great story and history, while @pigman shared nostalgic memories of racing events, likening this car's appeal to the thrill of experiencing high-performance machines going sideways during races.
Neutral: The seller, @feynmanfan, provided a wealth of information about the car's specifications and racing history. They clarified the functionality of the pedals, helping @Dave_at_OldSchool understand the clutch's position relevant for road racing. Throughout the conversation, @feynmanfan shared anecdotes about the vehicle's past, including its successful runs at road courses and even provided insights into the car's design choices such as using babbit bearings, which @gcervz13 inquired about.
Negative: Some questions arose regarding the vehicle's practicality for road racing; @Dave_at_OldSchool expressed concerns about whether the clutch placement made the car suitable for road racing beyond oval tracks, hinting at a need for potential modifications. Additionally, concerns were raised regarding fitting comfortably in the car, with @feynmanfan sharing that they hoped someone taller would help gauge whether it was too small for lengthy drives. @gcervz13 also questioned the choice of babbit bearings over updated insert bearings, suggesting a need for clarity on the decision-making process for the vehicle's build.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and thorough restoration, with @MinutemanMike describing it as a "clean Swedish machine" while @raspete expresses love for the auction process. @gwcoder (The Seller) acknowledges the gratitude for positive feedback and shares details about the restoration work, emphasizing its excellent documentation. Enthusiasts like @DeanBean appreciate the tan interior, seeing it as an improvement, and @wadds71 praises the comprehensive history of service and repairs, showcasing admiration for the car’s condition and craftsmanship. Overall, there’s a strong appreciation for how well the vehicle has been preserved and the meticulous attention to detail in its refurbishment.
Neutral: Several comments inquire about the vehicle's features and condition, such as @87033x6 asking about front and rear suspension bushings and @d-ray seeking clarification on the extent of the refurbishment, particularly regarding the engine work. @gwcoder (The Seller) responds to queries with detailed explanations about the restoration process, the car's ride characteristics in comparison to different models, and notes that there’s no mention of significant engine rebuilds. Additionally, there’s a call for driving videos, indicating that potential buyers seek more comprehensive insights into the car's performance.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding specific repair details and the lack of pictures for certain damage, as expressed by @6Shooters who asks about floor tear damage and repair visibility. @bialy1969 questions the comprehensive nature of the refurbishment, particularly about the motor. @gwcoder (The Seller) addresses these issues but reveals limitations in information about the engine's past. There’s an underlying tension between the seller's assurances and the buyers' need for transparency regarding the vehicle's comprehensive history and mechanical integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GermanCarDude opened the auction on a beautiful E30 5 speed, highlighting the significance of manual transmissions with #savethemanuals. @Myersport called the car gorgeous and expressed excitement about its Henna color, which they usually associate with E21s rather than an E30. @Ccast33 loved the color and wished the seller good luck in the auction, indicating appreciation for the vehicle.
Neutral: @Ccast33 posed some questions about the vehicle's maintenance, specifically asking about the timing belt and the oil light issue. @georgetsionis (The Seller) clarified that the light is for oil level rather than pressure and confirmed the timing belt has been replaced. @septicore requested a driving video and inquired about the presence of rust, while @M-technik-3 mentioned interest in the car and noted another similar vehicle they were offered. @niccof asked about the condition of the suspension components.
Negative: @septicore's request for a driving video and inquiry about rust suggests potential concerns regarding the car's condition. The questions about the suspension bushings and modifications from @niccof also hint at a cautious approach to assessing the vehicle's mechanical integrity. Overall, while many comments were positive or neutral, there were underlying concerns regarding the car’s condition that the seller needed to address.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @M66 commented on the great aesthetics of the car, expressing a desire to transition from a manual transmission. @its55 praised the design of the vehicle, stating that it was ahead of its time and remains superior to modern SUV designs. @ppointer mentioned their experience with an '09 version of the car, noting its excellent steering and braking compared to newer models like the '22 540i. @Mongoose55 reminisced about their E60, highlighting its fantastic handling characteristics and agreeing with @its55 about the design's durability over time.
In a welcoming tone, @aegmotorsports (The Seller) introduced the auction for the 2007 BMW E60 525i, detailing its attractive features and packages, including a premium and cold weather package, impressive technical specifications, and numerous luxury upgrades. The car is highlighted to include a comprehensive list of amenities such as Bluetooth connectivity, dual-zone climate control, and heated seats. @aegmotorsports is actively engaging with potential buyers, providing them with detailed information about the vehicle, and encouraging them to ask questions or request additional information.
Mixed sentiments were expressed regarding the vehicle's condition beyond the positives mentioned. @CTT inquired about the tire dates and overall condition. In response, @aegmotorsports confirmed that the car is fitted with a great set of Michelin Defender tires, dated from the 44th week of 2023, and noted the remaining tread depth is approximately 8/32. @Tactbacon requested a video demonstration of the vehicle's windows and panoramic sunroof, while also asking about the possible presence of leaks; @aegmotorsports reassured them that all windows and the sunroof function well without any leaks, maintaining a positive assurance about the vehicle's integrity.
Neutral:
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed appreciation for the overall condition and appearance of the vehicle. @davei noted that it is a great looking 4Runner, while @UscPhd97_ mentioned that the timing belt had been replaced by the previous owner. The seller, @ForrestGump9, shared that the truck performed flawlessly on long trips, emphasizing its reliability and originality. Other comments highlighted the beauty of the 4Runner, with @onlyhonda4me claiming it’s the best generation 4-Runner.
Neutral: The seller provided detailed information in response to inquiries about the vehicle, including the status of the timing belt, AC functionality, and the sunroof. @ForrestGump9 explained that the vehicle does not have body cladding, which was a point of interest. Several commenters also asked logistical questions, like whether the vehicle can be viewed in person, with the seller confirming that arrangements can be made. Additionally, @7Whiskey and @61DualQuad requested videos of various functionalities, which the seller provided.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding specific issues with the 4Runner. @esimmons9312 highlighted potential body rust in the passenger rear wheel well, asking for further details and photos to assess the situation. @mtn_racer inquired about possible oil or fluid leaks, while @mdoyle24 noted that it appeared bouncy in driving videos, questioning the condition of the shocks. @Rumrunner19 queried about the vehicle's emission test status, indicating possible apprehension regarding compliance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @danthediner expressed strong satisfaction with the vehicle, calling it one of his favorite daily drivers, and highlighted its enjoyable performance. @valleyfordguy also praised the Focus RS, referring to it as a 'time machine' opportunity due to its low mileage and expressing enthusiasm for its ability to deliver fun driving experiences. He mentioned the potential for mods that could add even more enjoyment to the vehicle. Similarly, @Serj shared his love for the Focus RS, citing its performance and practicality, and indicated that it remains one of the most fun vehicles to drive on twisty roads.
Neutral: @Farmerspring brought attention to the vehicle's maintenance history, specifically questioning the frequency of oil changes recorded on CarFax. @JayeDog66 noted that the car had been in storage for eight years, implying a lack of recent use. @mewsyr commented on the impressive performance of his own similar model, reinforcing the Focus RS’s reputation in the enthusiast community without directly commenting on the vehicle in question. @VCAR83 (The Seller) responded to several inquiries, providing information on the vehicle's past care and detailing its features with the intent to assure potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns about the head gasket plagued some comments, with @lewtus suggesting that detailed discussions about the head gasket should be standard in listings for the Focus RS. @bowling echoed this sentiment, asking the seller to clarify whether the head gasket had been replaced, indicating the model's known issues. Similar concerns were raised by @Blocksteel, who sought confirmation of service records associated with the head gasket replacement. @hcicen shared worries about the reliability of the low mileage, referencing a personal experience with a similar model that failed despite low miles, which highlighted the mixed feelings that some may have regarding the vehicle's maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle's aesthetics, particularly its stance and color. @grovesgt mentions the appealing stance, while @chollz finds the interior superior to that of most cars of the same age. @Ant5842 appreciates the beauty of the vehicle, noting its great specification, and @eelwood enhances this by sharing how the interior's linen combines beautifully with the Indishrot/Guards red exterior. @Alan_Berry, despite not being a fan of red 911s, admires this particular car for its striking appearance and inviting nature. Enthusiastic remarks about the car's analog feel, maintenance history, and upgrades are echoed by several users, creating a positive consensus about the car's overall desirability.
Neutral: Comments also reflect a curiosity about specifics and functionality. @Ruf75 inquires about the manufacturer of the wheels, while @iamken88 and @RR2017 ask about service records and potential oil leaks. @Maridad raises questions about the undercarriage and compliance for smog tests in California, indicating an interest in the vehicle's condition and operational status. Many users, including @Gikback and @kjl85, seek clarifications on technical details like rim width and sunroof functionality, showcasing an engaged audience eager for comprehensive information.
Negative: There are fewer negative comments, but a couple hint at concerns about the car's performance. @427435 questions the advantages of 17-inch wheels over stock options, while also expressing surprise at the car's specifications in relation to a powerful Corvette they previously owned. @RR2017's question on oil leaks was met with caution from @howS (The Seller), who clarifies that leaks are not typical but acknowledges the potential for concern. Overall, negativity is minimal compared to the positive and neutral remarks, with only mild apprehensions expressed.
![]() |






































































































































































