Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the Titanium Silver Metallic Alpina Roadster as magnifique and a lovely example of a super cool car, highlighting the credibility of @911r (The Seller). @wallyworld24 points out that the vehicle appears well cared for, especially given its 22 years and mileage. @Jszttxxj praises the 2003 BMW Alpina Roadster V8 for its unique balance of precision and power, noting the luxurious feel of the interior and the exceptional driving experience it offers. The engine’s performance transforms simple drives into enjoyable experiences, and @Jszttxxj emphasizes its rarity as one of only 555 ever made, appreciating its discreet and elegant presence.
Neutral: @lanny210 inquires about the availability of the window sticker and other accessories, indicating a curiosity about the vehicle’s completeness. @MacflyZ8 compliments the presentation and photos of the car while @GZ3180 requests a specific detail about the vehicle’s production number. @911r (The Seller) provides clarifications regarding the car’s accessories and shares various photos and videos showcasing the vehicle, aiming to reassure potential buyers about its condition and completeness.
Negative: @drbrett1 mentions observing what appears to be rock chip damage at the front of the car, but @911r (The Seller) quickly counters this by stating that the observed marks are merely reflections from gravel, asserting that the paint is in excellent condition. @1996MBZ expresses a critical opinion about Henrik Fisker, suggesting that while Fisker is talented in design, he struggles in manufacturing and selling vehicles, implying skepticism about the overall brand despite acknowledging the Alpina Roadster’s design quality.
 |
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the stunning beauty and meticulous restoration of the vehicle, with @Dollycat3 calling it “stunning and superb”. @tlcamg refers to the car as a lovely specimen, especially in its calming white color. @jsadamski expresses joy at the thought of owning such an amazing car, highlighting its desirability. The color combination of white with red is particularly praised by @Wickdude, who suggests it could serve as a perfect wedding car. Overall, there is a strong appreciation for its aesthetic appeal and the restoration efforts that have gone into it.
Neutral: Several comments feature inquiries about specific technical details of the vehicle. @Bordeaux poses questions regarding the engine specifications and carburetors while expressing interest in the restoration process. @revron contributes to this by discussing historical context and providing insights on production inconsistencies with the model. @tscott, the seller, also engages in clarifying details about the restoration and modifications made, showing a commitment to transparency about the vehicle’s history and condition, ensuring potential buyers have all necessary information.
Negative: On the downside, some comments express concerns regarding the extent of the restoration, with @ColumbiaMotorAlley noting that there are “too many panels replaced” for their taste. @stealthhabit feels that while the finish is stunning, it raises questions about the integrity of the original vehicle given the amount of replacement metal. Additionally, @Al_Cantara raises valid concerns about potential rust and asks about how the restored parts are protected, contributing to a discussion about the quality and longevity of the repairs. These comments reflect a sense of caution among some viewers about the car’s restoration history.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are greatly impressed with the vehicle’s aesthetic appeal and exclusivity. @boaboyoz praises the LaFerrari as a breathtakingly beautiful piece of engineering, while @TommyBruin expresses amazement at its obscenely beautiful design and rarity. @G2Z and @sledgehammer722 marvel at the financial potential, stating that this car marks a true investment worth millions. The beauty of the Blu Elettrico color, contrasting with the common red, is noted by many including @Jmay77, @70_duster, and @diskis190, reflecting a consensus that this car stands out in its class.
Neutral: Responses to the auction reveal a mix of enthusiasm and inquiry about ownership. @silverarrowcarsltd, the seller, indicates they are ready to provide extensive support for potential buyers, including inspections and shipping arrangements. Comments reflect fascination with the vehicle’s past, suggesting it comes from an impressive collection owned by a notable Microsoft executive. Many commenters such as @signature, @TheAmazingMorty, and @DoctorA reflect on what the purchase signifies, transcending just a car to being a piece of exclusive art and engineering.
Negative: Some comments are critical or raise concerns regarding the practicality of owning such a powerful vehicle. @Billythekiddo questions the 1000 HP power and its safety for casual driving, while others express skepticism about the high costs associated with maintenance, like the battery replacement mentioned by @signes and @essrt8. Concerns about how little the car has been driven are echoed by @ksccts, as well as inquiries on the car’s usage and the rationale behind its limited mileage expressed by @Vision_Mixer and @JettJolene. Additionally, Some voices like @PanteraMike74 stress the need for inspections, suggesting they want to ensure the car meets their expectations given its significant price tag.
|
 |
Positive: @navchak expressed excitement about the vehicle, likening it to “to the moon!”. @boaboyoz called it a “Georgia Peach” and highlighted its fabulous condition, while @Pettyfan43 raised enthusiasm over its potential value, stating it appears to be a million-dollar car. @Sovereign305 noted that prices for low-mileage Heritage models are trending up, indicating strong interest in the car’s investment potential. @papo had the opportunity to see the Ford GT Heritage in person and described it as an exceptional and well-cared-for gem, instilling confidence in potential bidders.
Neutral: Comments from @MeritPartners, the seller, included helpful information additions about the vehicle, such as announcing the inclusion of stock muffler parts and answering questions regarding previous ownership history. The seller informed that there have been three owners of this Heritage Edition and shared insights about the excitement surrounding the auction, noting the abundance of fine examples being presented in the market. @dlaw66 theorized about the potential for a Heritage edition to reach $1 million in future auctions, reflecting on the car’s perceived value without any strong bias.
Negative: @nota4re raised concerns regarding the OEM exhaust parts’ absence and the implications of the aftermarket modifications on emissions compliance. They pointed out that despite the appealing performance of the current exhaust system, the lack of catalytic converters could present issues in certain states. @OneOfEach humorously stated they were glad not to favor the car’s orange and blue color scheme, implying a degree of disapproval. Additionally, @BabyD69 criticized the trend of low mileage GTs being infrequently driven, questioning the practicality and accessibility of using such vehicles in everyday scenarios.
|
 |
Positive: @Daspyda noted the upgraded JDM TT transmission in their vehicle and commented positively on its improved syncros, suggesting that the seller’s car looks well sorted. @Choka and @johnnyschelaq expressed admiration for the vehicle, with @Choka referring to it as a beauty and @johnnyschelaq feeling a strong personal connection to it. @zdoctor highlighted the chrome wheels as adding class, while @Chrystal commented on the low mileage and beautiful aesthetics of the 300ZX, showcasing a sense of community excitement for the car. Meanwhile, @Commander3 shared their long-term positive ownership experience with a similar car, indicating reliability and satisfaction with its performance.
Neutral: @Hhesam123 (The Seller) explained that the car represents the culmination of a dedicated search for a cleaner example, detailing the use of OEM parts in its restoration. They provided clarification regarding the tire and wheel positioning and confirmed all features, except for the power antenna, are functional. Additionally, @iflyroads raised questions about the car’s claimed mileage and asked for maintenance documentation, while @Rynohd acknowledged the need for definitive answers. Several commenters, including @BSK71 and @Capttaylor, requested video evidence of the car’s condition, such as driving videos and start-up demonstrations, showing an interest in verifying the seller’s claims.
Negative: Some commenters expressed confusion about the tire configuration, with @BSK71 questioning why the rears were moved to the front and @Eric_B clarifying potential issues with the wheel placement. @Rynohd and @iflyroads voiced concerns about incomplete or ambiguous answers regarding maintenance records and the transmission’s originality, with @iflyroads deciding not to proceed without clearer information. @300ZXZ32 questioned the necessity of the transmission replacement, referring to the lack of issues in older models, while @CarSalesman sought clarification on any improvements in the new transmission, hinting at doubts about the claims made by the seller.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed a great appreciation for the 1969 Ford Mustang Coupe’s aesthetic and historical significance, especially due to its connection with actor Ron Livingston, known for his roles in films like “Office Space” and “Band of Brothers.” Users have lauded its unique Lime Gold color and noted that the car appears to have been well-maintained despite being a daily driver. There is a consensus that, with its long history and classic appearance, this Mustang is not only visually appealing but also holds significant emotional value, making it a desirable classic car for potential buyers. Many also commend the seller, @loment11, for attracting engaging conversations about the vehicle’s background and features.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a mix of curiosity and speculation about the car’s value, particularly considering its pop culture association and age. Some users pointed out discrepancies related to the car’s marketing as a “Grande” model, with @JBBearcat clarifying that the vehicle lacks many of the features associated with that model. Discussions about the car’s history and condition also drew attention, highlighting the extent of its ownership and maintenance. @loment11, the seller, provided insights on the car’s history and current condition, reinforcing the Mustang’s status as a collectible vehicle and providing transparency about any minor issues.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, some negative comments revolved around the description inaccuracies, particularly regarding the vehicle’s model classification as a Grande. @JBBearcat raised concerns about the lack of luxury features that are typically found in Grande models, suggesting either a misunderstanding from the seller or a mistake in the auction listing. Additionally, concerns were raised about potential rust observed in parts of the car, which @Justain brought up, questioning the extent of the damage and the car’s overall condition. This has led to a broader discussion about the implications of these issues on the car’s value and potential marketability.
|
 |
Positive: @Jjd1776 expressed enthusiasm about the 2008 XKR Portfolio, calling it a fantastic GT car that has always drawn compliments and praising its reliability. @Nitmr26, a former owner, mentioned receiving numerous compliments on the vehicle and appreciated its stunning appearance, especially in the Celestial Black color. @AugustinAustin shared his experience with a similar model, highlighting its dependability and enjoyment, stating that it is one of the funnest cars he has ever owned. @kearncreek agreed with this sentiment, noting that even though his only issue was a flat battery, owning the car has been a complete pleasure and a fun experience.
Neutral: The seller, @ipc838, provided detailed information about the car’s maintenance history, recent service updates, and specifications. He mentioned that the car has undergone a full suspension refresh and had various fluids replaced to ensure it’s in good condition. The seller also provided insights on the car’s specific features, like the blue metallic flake finish and the OEM wheels that were swapped before his ownership. Additionally, various commenters asked questions about the vehicle, showing an interest in details like tire age, headliner condition, and any potential flaws.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle’s condition. @Clevecigr pointed out loose upholstery on the headliner and wear on the dash, asking for more pictures to evaluate these flaws. @fogdog inquired about the potential issue of wet carpets, which are known to appear in this model due to drain blockages, and @fogdog also questioned the frequency of oil changes mentioned by the seller. Overall, while the car seems to have many appreciative qualities, there were inquiries about specific maintenance and condition concerns that potential buyers were keen to confirm.
|
 |
Positive: Multiple commenters praised the vehicle for its aesthetics and overall appeal. @Rpiccola referred to it as a ‘sweet coupe,’ while @onlyhonda4me commented on its great looks, particularly appreciating the design features that predate the prominent front grill design. @MPM97turbo shared fond memories of a similar model they owned, reflecting on its impressive performance and timeless style. @sirajali05 echoed this sentiment, noting how well Japanese-owned Euros are typically maintained, and expressed admiration for the car’s immaculate condition. @tightt even mentioned feeling tempted to consider purchasing it, highlighting its widespread appeal among enthusiasts.
Neutral: A mix of comments highlighted a significant concern regarding the vehicle’s mileage. @Chanman1029 raised potential issues with the accuracy of the odometer, providing evidence of previous records suggesting discrepancies in its reported kilometers. @GearBoxNJ, who is the seller, committed to verifying these claims, indicating a willingness to uphold transparency and address any lurking uncertainties. Concerns over the vehicle’s history led to a thorough discussion, with the seller acknowledging the situation and agreeing to update the auction format to no reserve, as suggested by @bringatrailer, reflecting a constructive dialogue about its history and condition.
Negative: Conversely, some users expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle’s maintenance records and genuine mileage, particularly @Chanman1029 who insisted on the importance of full disclosure of the car’s history. @GreaseToGallery questioned the presence of essential service records, expressing concerns about significant maintenance such as timing and turbos, while @fieldwell sought clarification on maintenance records from Japan. This underlying skepticism about the vehicle’s true condition and history highlights the complexity of purchasing imported used cars and the importance of transparency in such transactions.
|
 |
Positive: @rtjacobites describes the vehicle as ‘Perfection’ and expresses amazement, while @ndl83 points out the car’s impressive history, noting it was one of Ralph Levin’s museum cars and emphasizes the money spent on it. @Cornbread finds the car classy, particularly appreciating its beautiful blue color, and @MsMelis expresses a strong desire to own it, calling it her dream car. @DocMGL highlights its regal appearance noting the Continental Kit as a significant accessory, and @Dollycat3 supports the car’s aesthetic with enthusiasm, finding it stunning and exceptional. Overall, several commenters, including @1996MBZ and @Hoppy18, echo similar praises about the color combination and design, aligning it with American excellence.
Neutral: @DocMGL discusses the dimensions of the car, providing information that the length is approximately 22 feet with the Continental Kit attached. @jbsadler, another commenter, seeks specific details about the total length, indicating a practical interest in understanding the vehicle’s size for potential bidding. The discussion on its history notes that the original paint was beige, and commenters acknowledge modifications that were made, with @eliteautos confirming some changes in the vehicle’s specifications but emphasizing that the car’s presentation is stunning. There are inquiries about the functionality of the car’s features, with @cjhcsh asking for evidence of operational elements like lights and windows.
Negative: @ericdev raises concerns regarding the authenticity of the vehicle, suggesting it may have been modified from a Series 62 Coupe into a convertible and questioning the alterations made to the body tag. He presents detailed observations regarding the discrepancies in body tags and the original features that would have been included, leading to discussions about the car’s originality. @2caddiesandaMach1 mentions the potential for the Continental Kit to be a bolt-on accessory, further complicating the debate about modifications. @morettikm also questions the integrity of the color change, which adds to a more critical view of the car’s originality and intended modifications.
|
Original-Owner, 8k-Mile 2004 Ford Mustang GT Convertible 5-Speed
1FAFP45X54F141691
Lot 204217
Dealer
 |
Positive: @onlyhonda4me expresses enthusiasm for keeping the manual transmission alive, echoing a common sentiment in the car community about preserving vehicles with manual gearboxes. @RED01SVT highlights the rarity of this particular Mustang, noting that it could be one of only 254 produced due to its rear wing delete feature, which adds exclusivity and desirability to the car. The unique aspects of the Crimson Red Anniversary edition are also celebrated by several commentors, such as @laffs, who appreciates the special details like the painted folding mirrors and the overall condition of the vehicle, reinforcing the appeal of owning a collectible car like this one.
Neutral: Several comments provide clarification regarding the vehicle’s features and history. @idrivemine points out that the spoiler delete is a standard part of the 40th Anniversary Package, while @MikuhlBrian offers a breakdown of the production numbers for the specific model, confirming its limited quantity. The discussions also touch on practical aspects, with @SpeederP23 and @Prelude inquiring about the convertible top boot and tire dates, respectively, which reflect potential buyers’ due diligence in assessing the car’s condition.
Negative: There are some concerns and inquiries that might raise flags for potential buyers. @tp808 questions whether the air conditioning still works, pointing out a lack of information about this feature, even though @911r (The Seller) confirms that it is functioning well. Additionally, @JWB23 asks if any original tires or paperwork like the bill of sale are available, indicating a desire for thorough documentation that may be expected with classic car transactions. These queries suggest that while the car has many positive attributes, potential buyers are cautious and seeking reassurance about its overall authenticity and condition.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous comments highlight the vehicle’s aesthetics and seller’s reliability. @dgclassiccars describes the LR90 as being in beautiful, rust-free condition and finished in a rare and stunning blue. @deanort and @debtsandbooze appreciate the vehicle’s appearance, calling it ‘beautiful’ and expressing desire for similar features like the extra cylinder in the TD5. Additionally, @onedaydream shares a positive experience in working with @dgclassiccars, noting his comfort and confidence in purchasing an overseas vehicle due to the seller’s assistance.
Neutral: The technical aspects of the vehicle’s engine options have generated a blend of curiosity and information sharing among commenters. @AnyOldIron asks about the TD5 vs. the 300 Tdi, receiving clarification from @GBRBiLL regarding the differences between the engines. @WAGONBOYTD mentions the tuning challenges associated with the TD5 while also praising its power. There’s also a discussion about potential upgrades and aftermarket options like air conditioning, with suggestions from @OFritz3 and @AnxiousWin on sourcing AC units.
Negative: Concerns regarding the import procedures and eligibility have been raised by users such as @Bobscofan. They question the implications of the vehicle’s model year on U.S. registration and customs. Although @dgclassiccars reassures potential buyers by explaining the import process, there remains a level of uncertainty about logistical challenges and costs associated with international shipping and compliance with local regulations, as indicated by other commenters’ inquiries.
|
 |
Positive: @Papaed78 expresses excitement about the vehicle, calling it a “rig” and showing a positive emotional response with a heart emoji. @SnoDawg describes the rig as spectacular and likens it to a piece of artwork that could be showcased. @austin_alfa reminisces about his history with BMW bikes and praises the combination of the Steib sidecar and the R60 model, asserting that this vehicle stands out in condition and design, describing it as a moving work of art. @Vincent998 admires the beautiful outfit and shows interest in the sidecar brake, indicating a strong appreciation for its aesthetics. @Davidlee8 and @Mercury_Man also highlight the classic combination of the R60/2 and Steib 501, emphasizing its appeal and beauty.
Neutral: @GattoVeloce (The Seller) engages with the community, expressing excitement for learning about the bikes and responding to comments about the vehicle’s details. The seller welcomes suggestions and clarifications regarding potential discrepancies, such as the use of Earles forks and the VIN numbers, showing a willingness to address buyer concerns. @LC123 asks for a cold start video and maintenance records, which indicates a prudent approach to the purchase. Others like @Rbeemer and @Slash2 provide insights on the hinge specifications and historical context of the model, showing a collective knowledge appreciation.
Negative: However, there are critical comments regarding discrepancies in the vehicle’s specifications. @Ant5842 points out that the engine may not match the original frame, questioning the accuracy of the listing. @SteveRankin suggests that the title may be incorrect, implying a misunderstanding of the bike’s model details. @GattoVeloce (The Seller) acknowledges these concerns and promises to provide more information, indicating that clarity is needed as the auction progresses. @raei55 inquires about maintenance records, hinting at potential issues with the vehicle’s history that may raise red flags for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @stsa84 commented on the beautiful green color of the car, wishing the seller luck with the auction. @Noisyboyz also expressed admiration for the color, saying if he were to own a green car, this would be it. @johnnyvett praised the Corvette’s appearance, mentioning its nice stance and the shade of green, while also offering well wishes for the auction. @Diablonut shared nostalgia about the dealership where the car was originally bought, reminiscing about his time there and appreciating the car’s unique color combination. The seller, @19Seventyone71, thanked everyone for their kind comments and mentioned the car’s status as a true survivor. @TheBerthaCar and @Jakerdog also complimented the vehicle, noting the quality of its presentation and color combo, contributing to the overall positive reception.
Neutral: There were several inquiries about the car’s specifications from users like @Cars3D, who asked if it has drum or disc brakes, and @WGZ who requested information about the suspension and drivetrain. The seller, @19Seventyone71, clarified that the car has four-wheel disc brakes and shared information about the motor mount being recently replaced, indicating the lack of other issues. Additionally, @MattDorram sought specifics about when the car was repainted, to which the seller responded that it is all original and has never been painted. Throughout the comments, there were discussions on how the vehicle has been received during the auction season.
Negative: @no.radar pointed out @johnnyvett’s repeated comment, suggesting that it was unnecessary. @johnnyvett responded, stating it was unintentional, which shows a small instance of miscommunication in the conversation. @96dyna inquired about any other issues the car might have, hinting at concerns regarding its condition, while the seller reassured that all that was needed had been handled. Additionally, @davidemry expressed a desire to know the amount needed to purchase the car, showing a potential gap between buyers’ expectations and the selling price, which aligns with the typical apprehensions buyers might face when interested in high-value vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @SweetieB (The Seller) responded to @RichSFlyAA by stating that the vehicle has been well-maintained with all recommended services performed at regular intervals. She reassured bidders about the condition of the car, stating it is in exceptional shape for its age and mileage. She also expressed gratitude for the interest shown in the auction and invited potential buyers for test drives and personal showings.
Neutral: Comments from @Martinft and @BoltonBlue pointed out areas of concern regarding the vehicle’s mileage history, noting discrepancies in the reported mileage and suggesting a potential clerical error. @SweetieB acknowledged these concerns and described the mileage issue as an accidental misreporting rather than an intentional rollback. Despite these concerns, several commenters expressed interest in the vehicle, highlighting its appearance and overall appeal.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @RMcN and @Martinft about inconsistencies in the vehicle’s history, such as unaccounted mileage and its reported accident status on verification platforms, suggesting potential issues with transparency. @Belair1900 referenced the principle of “caveat emptor,” indicating that buyers should be cautious. @RMcN specifically pointed out that online verification tools were offering conflicting reports, which could undermine the seller’s credibility.
|
 |
Positive: @Barryward expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as a “nice vett” which suggests a favorable impression of the Chevrolet Corvette Convertible. @collectibleclassics, the seller, offers a welcoming introduction to their dealership and emphasizes their commitment to customer satisfaction and transparency, backed by high Google Reviews ratings. They highlight the car’s unique features and assure potential buyers of a seamless purchasing experience, including inspection services and logistics support.
Neutral: @Milenko339 raises logical inquiries about the car’s condition, including the functionality of specific features like the CD player and the performance of the headlights. They also ask questions regarding the weather stripping and heating capabilities of the A/C system. The seller responds affirmatively, assuring that the climate controls and power locks function correctly, and they address concerns about the weather stripping by providing a video for evaluation.
Negative: @Milenko339 notes concerns about the potential replacement needs for specific parts like the gears and the OptiSpark system. They point out that the tires, dated from 2008 and 2011, will likely need replacement soon, highlighting an aspect of the car that could be a dealbreaker for some potential buyers. These questions indicate a cautious approach towards the vehicle’s condition, which may evoke apprehension in buyers who prioritize reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @Ford512 reflects on their experience with a 2001 model, expressing nostalgia for the vehicle and highlighting its fun performance after making some modifications. They note that it’s easy to enhance the truck’s speed, suggesting a positive overall sentiment towards the driving experience. Additionally, @Noisycow shares a fond memory of owning a 2001 L truck, emphasizing how much they missed it after selling, only to have it totaled shortly after. This showcases a strong emotional connection to the vehicle and its lasting impact.
Neutral: @cwalker985 makes inquiries regarding the vehicle’s condition, specifically mentioning marks on the tailgate and showing interest in additional pictures, without expressing a strong opinion either way. They ask for clarification and video content from @brettw27 (The Seller), indicating curiosity about the truck’s features without suggesting any particular liking or disliking. The interaction conveys practical engagement with the seller’s content, focusing on details and additional information.
Negative: @cwalker985 expresses a bit of disappointment regarding the price of the vehicle, suggesting they would have been interested if it were closer to $10k instead of the already reached $14k. This implies a sense of frustration over costs, suggesting that priciness could deter potential buyers. Similarly, @TTSVT25’s inquiry about pictures of the bottom of the doors/tailgate indicates concern about the vehicle’s condition, hinting that there may be underlying issues that buyers are considering.
|
 |
Positive: @MasterDebator expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, calling it fantastic. @ForzaV12 praised the vehicle’s color, labeling it as the best for a 914 and wishing the seller good luck with the auction. Another user found it to be a nice piece and enjoyed a shot of @914vida at an autocross event, suggesting that it looked like a lot of fun.
Neutral: @914vida (The Seller) shared details on the vehicle’s history, stating he bought the car in 2008 for DE and autocross events but ceased racing after a rebuild in 2016. He addressed inquiries about the car’s maintenance, noting that it was stored in a garage and maintained with regular oil changes. The seller confirmed that the car has fewer than 100 miles driven since 2016 and averaged a drive every three months until recently preparing it for auction.
Negative: Comments raised concerns about various aspects of the car. @LSBowers questioned the accuracy of the mileage stated in the auction listing. @DRIVEGUY inquired about the car’s streetability and comfort for non-racing use, while another user, @Hercule_LaJoy, sought confirmation about the frequency of neighborhood drives and the condition of the tires. Additionally, there were concerns about the vehicle’s electrical system, with @KramerSon asking about the functioning of the lights and smog exemption status; @fortheloveofcars questioned the inclusion of specific parts in the sale.
|
 |
Positive: A number of comments highlight the reliability and overall excellent condition of the vehicle. @deramble expressed enthusiasm, stating that someone will get a true ‘winner’ in this car, while @TheDudeAbides2 acknowledged the car’s bulletproof reliability, confirming its reputation. @mitpatel2025 (The Seller) reinforced this by mentioning that the car has been serviced annually at a Lexus dealership, with a recent inspection showing perfect results. Additionally, the car has low mileage of 61.5K and has been garage-kept, primarily used for leisurely drives, which adds to its well-maintained status.
Neutral: Several comments provide contextual insights about the car’s specifications and service history. @mitpatel2025 (The Seller) clarified the car’s model generation, indicating it belongs to the second generation of the ES300, emphasizing quality and engineering craftsmanship. Other commenters made technical inquiries about the vehicle, such as side window framing and tire conditions, to which @mitpatel2025 provided informative responses, indicating the presence of features designed for enhanced quietness and comfort, as well as the current state of the tires.
Negative: There are some concerns raised about the vehicle, including a comment from @PepeTex questioning the damage on the front right bumper, which @mitpatel2025 explained was due to a parking mishap. Furthermore, @David_F suggested budgeting for a timing belt service for peace of mind, noting that the last replacement was back in 2011. These issues signal that while the car appears to be in great condition overall, potential buyers should be aware of its age-related maintenance needs.
|
 |
Positive: @PhilO expressed enthusiasm for the bike, mentioning it would be a great ride. @Dave310 appreciated the cool patina of the bike, while acknowledging that the fact it was owned by @BillieJoeArmstrong doesn’t necessarily add value unless one is a fan of Green Day. @gillachattan praised the bike as one of Triumph’s best years and noted its nice features, saying he would definitely buy it. @vin_espo liked the patina and wished the seller good luck with the sale, while @HeavyTank77 shared a nostalgic story connected to Green Day, enhancing the bike’s charm. @mhlcat also expressed love for the bike’s patina, suggesting it has a strong aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Comments indicated curiosity primarily about the bike’s condition and modifications. @MarioDesmo inquired whether any work was done to the engine or transmission, while @Witsend acknowledged the fleeting ownership by a celebrity and its implications on value. @cooper22boss noted a longing for a ride but mostly contributed a light-hearted remark. @davekirsten (The Seller) provided updates about the bike’s mechanical state, promising to share a cold start and ride video. Discussions around whether the bike had back registration fees arose with @ratrodCOE querying the implications of its past ownership. Several users were interested in its running condition and sought verification on its mechanics.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism about the bike and its celebrity ownership. @notdads questioned if Billie Joe actually signed off on the odometer disclosure, hinting at concerns about authenticity. @irfgt criticized the bike’s condition, suggesting it looked like it had been left outside for a long time. @BULLITT65 expressed doubt about the mileage during Billie Joe’s ownership and questioned whether the paint was original. @ghtaboma raised an issue regarding celebrity ownership and its actual impact on value. @malloryross criticized the potential hype tied to Billie Joe’s brief ownership, suggesting potential neglect of the bike in a lightening manner.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the SL550 for its stunning beauty and exceptional condition. @swb911s remarked that it was the best 500 series SL they had seen, noting the impressive stablemates in the background, while @Lawrence12 called it ‘absolutely immaculate,’ highlighting details like the wheel well liners. @DaveSirois also expressed admiration for the car’s immaculate appearance, and @MK69 called it a beautiful car, underscoring its uniqueness as one of only 100. The seller, @blakem357, provided extensive details about the vehicle’s serviced condition and the quality upgrades, contributing to a positive perception overall.
Neutral: The conversation included inquiries that showcased potential buyers’ interest in specific details about the vehicle. @skates15 requested undercarriage pictures, particularly due to concerns about the car spending time in the snow belt, which @blakem357 promised to provide. @BM512 and @GACarnut asked about the ABC suspension system and utilitarian features like the cargo net and wind deflector. Other commenters, like @InternetMarketing, requested additional photos to clarify certain aspects about the car’s condition, showing that there was engagement around obtaining verification to make informed decisions.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns regarding the car’s ownership history. @emanrace asked for clarification on why there appeared to be six owners, prompting @blakem357 to explain that there were only three true owners who used the car. An issue arose regarding Carfax listings, with @emanrace concerned about the portrayal of ownership, but @blakem357 mentioned that they were in the process of correcting these inaccuracies. Additionally, @McFood noted they couldn’t bid due to needing daytime driving capabilities, indicating some logistical issues potential buyers faced regarding this vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @spg356 (The Seller) shares the rich history of the 1965 356C Cabriolet, emphasizing that it’s a one-family-owned vehicle with a solid mechanical condition and great driving experience. The car, despite its cosmetic challenges, drives exceptionally well, accelerating smoothly and with strong handling characteristics. Many commenters, such as @AMCNJ and @Shawh, praise the transparency and detailed presentation of the auction, commending the seller for being forthcoming about the car’s condition and history. Participants appreciate the vehicle’s nostalgic value and its background, with @Christmo and @Dollycat3 highlighting the heartwarming family story behind the car.
Neutral: Comments reflect a balanced view on the vehicle’s condition and potential. There are discussions about the car’s authenticity and originality, including mixed observations on repainting and body repairs necessary to restore it. @ddrxdd inquires about a compression test for the rebuilt engine, while @TDR asks about the carpeting changes and the factory specifications on headrests. @dougdadmac provides insights into restoration costs and considerations, illustrating the various factors that influence whether the vehicle should be restored or left as-is. The conditional makeup of the car garners appeals for both preservation and restoration, with some, like @jer5ak, leaning toward keeping its original feel.
Negative: Critiques focus primarily on several areas needing attention and improvement, particularly the amateur bodywork and rust issues that detract from the vehicle’s overall appeal. @zeres points out the amount of rust visible, while others acknowledge the extensive repairs required for a complete restoration. The presence of amateur fixes on the underside of the car raises concerns about overall safety and durability. @Valkyrja and @BobSoCal express skepticism about potential restoration costs, suggesting a significant investment needed to return the car to a pristine condition may deter prospective buyers. Overall, while there is a recognition of the car’s charm, the negative comments underscore the challenges ahead for any future owner.
|
 |
Positive: @WallyMeanwell describes the vehicle as fantastic, citing his positive experience with Geneva Motorcars and the admiration it has received from others for its looks. He recalls enjoying his first Range Rover and plans to buy another in the future. He mentions that after a full inspection by a Land Rover dealership, the vehicle was deemed to be in great shape, expressing confidence in having his kids drive it across the country.
Neutral: The discussion includes inquiries about the timing belts, with @afmuro72 mistakenly referring to them as timing chains. @volvo268 and @rafematz clarify that the vehicle is a diesel, which doesn’t use timing chains, and mention that there are timing belts that require replacement every 112,000 miles. @WallyMeanwell also addresses @edcabad’s question regarding the trim and follows up with the dealership for clarification, although he reports they provided no further information.
Negative: @WallyMeanwell admits to a minor issue where he bumped a curb, resulting in a scuff on the wheel. He also mentions the vehicle only comes with one key fob, and he hasn’t priced out obtaining a second. Additional concerns arise from @mwebbsc’s comment regarding unaddressed recommendations from the pre-inspection for new tires and front lower control arms, to which @WallyMeanwell confirms those repairs were not completed.
|
 |
Positive: @emcenerney praised the truck for its aftermarket appointments at such low mileage, calling it amazing. @Skowalski6718 also found it to be an amazing example and shared a positive personal experience with a similar engine. The seller @4byFreak explained the truck’s features and maintenance, emphasizing the clarity and authenticity of the VIN and window sticker, which appears to have alleviated some concerns from potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Shoovel and @TPH56, highlighted factual aspects of the truck’s cab type, originality of the mileage, and maintenance history, with @Rizzo07067 inquiring about specific features like the presence of an auxiliary jack. @HeavyTank77 speculated on the truck’s history, suggesting it may have sat unused for various reasons. @Cougarxr71970 initially expressed confusion over the VIN but later acknowledged that it matched, showing how discussions evolved.
Negative: Concerns were raised by commenters such as @vnmus04 regarding the odd design of the regular cab, while @Rizzo07067 noted the poor reputation of the 2004 F150 engine and the necessity of replacing spark plugs as indicative of potential issues. @212121CA questioned the legitimacy of the vehicle’s specifications and whether it would pass a smog check, expressing skepticism about the seller’s claims. @9literviper criticized @Rizzo07067 for repeatedly questioning the authenticity of the truck without making a bid.
|
 |
Positive: @ploob59 exclaimed in excitement about the unique umber GTS, showing enthusiasm for the vehicle. @Outlogged contributed useful information about the model and features, listing impressive specifications such as the MSRP and additional options. Reviewers praised the quality of the Cayenne GTS, highlighting its one-owner status, amazing color, and service history, suggesting it is a rare find.
Neutral: @GB1776 raised a valid concern regarding a minor damage note on the Carfax report and requested more detailed information about the repairs. @nexusautobrokers (The Seller) addressed this by reassuring that such minor damage is often cosmetic and not a significant concern since the vehicle is difficult to procure. @jazzman66 pointed out a discrepancy in the vehicle’s color registration on the Carfax report, and the seller clarified that this is a common issue with DMV classifications.
Negative: @Bruce48127 inquired about the transfer case update, indicating a potential concern about the vehicle’s maintenance history. Although @nexusautobrokers (The Seller) responded positively, noting efforts to verify its condition, the initial uncertainty may leave potential buyers apprehensive. @therhs6232 added that a bidder was overly eager, suggesting that some may find the bidding atmosphere competitive and stressful.
|
 |
Positive: @StuMeyer praises the seller’s workmanship, mentioning their longstanding reputation for quality in large projects and stating that the van he saw previously was spectacular. @kiefer commends the beautiful work and requests more photos, indicating admiration for the build. @Eleventhirteen83 appreciates the beautiful introduction video and compliments the seller on the amazing job done on the van, noting it as a beauty.
Neutral: Seller @MSchoening provides various details throughout the comments, including the standing room height, which is approximately 6′-2″, and offers to modify certain features of the van based on buyer preferences before the auction closes. He acknowledges inquiries about insulation and battery systems, explaining that they can be upgraded if needed. @B.Bear notes the van’s engine efficiency and the selling price in relation to his personal usage, confirming it drives well even when fully loaded, and mentions he would consider adding an awning if he retained ownership.
Negative: Some comments express curiosity about specific features without clear answers given in the initial description, like the total height of the vehicle from @B.Bear and the standing room dimensions from @MadronaDriver. This suggests a potential lack of detailed upfront information that some buyers may desire. Additionally, there are concerns raised about insulation under the floor and how it behaves in cold, which @MSchoening addresses, but may leave room for doubts regarding winter performance, particularly among buyers in colder climates.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has been well-maintained and shows signs of excellent stewardship, as noted by @RoadTherapy. @gfeatherstone373 (The Seller) has made significant investments in maintenance, including replacing key components like the oil pan gasket, oil filter housing gasket, and other important parts. The use of high-quality products such as Liqui Moly oil and BMW coolant highlights the care taken to ensure the car’s longevity. Additionally, new tires with minimal mileage contribute to the positive impression of the vehicle’s upkeep.
Neutral: @gfeatherstone373 (The Seller) provides detailed information about the vehicle’s condition and maintenance history, suggesting that there are some minor imperfections like small scratches and dents typical of a car with over 100k miles. While the exterior has been polished, waxed, and cleaned, it is acknowledged that there may be wear consistent with its age. Future updates include plans to upload a driving video and respond with a walk-around video to address queries about any visible imperfections.
Negative: While the car has been well cared for, some potential concerns include the presence of minor scratches and dents, which @gfeatherstone373 (The Seller) admits are present due to the vehicle’s mileage. @LCSANLO’s request for a walkthrough pointing out these imperfections reflects a need for transparency regarding the car’s actual condition. The fact that some imperfections may not be visible from a distance could lead to mixed perceptions among buyers regarding the overall aesthetic of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express excitement and admiration for the vehicle, referring to it as a “nice RC” and a “beast of a rig.” @DDMF17 points out the truck’s underappreciated value, suggesting a potential for rising stock. Multiple commenters, including @braktrcr, compliment the looks and potential performance of the truck, emphasizing its appeal to off-road enthusiasts. The Seller, @59FUELIEIMPALA, is proactive in keeping the conversation engaging by promising additional videos and photos, further fueling interest in the vehicle.
Neutral: The Seller addresses several technical inquiries, providing information about the vehicle’s AC system which simply requires a Freon recharge after prolonged storage. @nuthinbutmopar raises questions about the driveshaft configuration and exhaust system, to which the Seller responds with information on potential modifications and clarifications. There is also a query from @Ron86 about the whereabouts of original parts, indicating some interest in the vehicle’s authenticity and history.
Negative: Some commenters have raised technical concerns regarding the vehicle’s modifications, such as the installation of the driveshaft and lack of tailpipe exits, which may raise questions about its performance or adherence to original specifications. @hinky inquires whether re-arching springs or a lift kit was used, suggesting potential skepticism about the modifications made. The Seller’s responses indicate an acknowledgment of these concerns, yet some uncertainty remains regarding specific technical choices made during the vehicle’s customization.
|
 |
Positive: @ShirtPants commented on the vehicle’s attractive specifications and eye-catching color, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @oldtown noted the rare color and requested more detailed pictures of the dash’s condition, highlighting interest in the model’s uniqueness. @ArtistFox shared enthusiasm for the Laser Blue Metallic color, describing it as attractive, which suggests positive reception among enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Uby67vw1958 inquired about the service history of the transmission and coolant flush, indicating a desire for maintenance transparency. @misspepto wanted to confirm whether the air conditioning was functioning well, showing interest in its operational features. @Sabath asked for videos demonstrating the vehicle’s functionalities, such as window operation and the sunroof, which implies a need for detailed proof of the vehicle’s condition.
Negative: @flyfaster raised concerns about the cracked dashboard and a stained headrest, pointing out potential issues that could impact buyers’ perceptions. @delz05 similarly pushed for clearer images of the vehicle’s underside and commented on the overall condition. @Sabath criticized the seller for not providing enough videos in previous listings, suggesting that a lack of transparency could hinder sales, reflecting a skeptical view regarding the sales process.
|
 |
Positive: @997TTS praised the car’s interior color and noted its mileage as being just right, not too much to raise concerns for potential buyers. @alfriedesq and @TBK911 both complimented the stunning aesthetics of the vehicle, with @TBK911 mentioning a desire to purchase one despite owning another model. @bmwm3tz referred to the vehicle as having a stunning specification and offered good luck with the sale, while @Texasnoiz highlighted the clean and unique interior alongside the impressive colored seatbacks. @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 expressed that this model makes a fantastic daily driver due to its beautiful appearance and drivability.
Neutral: Several commentors raised questions regarding the vehicle’s details and condition. @Romand076 inquired about the original window sticker and known flaws, while @9KRS asked about protective film and potential scratches. @rshestakov88, the seller, responded that there are some cracks on the center console but reassured that the interior is in good shape overall. @BlackH20 discussed the durability of the carbon fiber interiors and offered solutions for repair instead of replacement. Views on market dynamics were mentioned by @Texasnoiz and @7and8s, noting varying specifics on interest in different regions.
Negative: @dino70089 and @JesseTrigg85 brought up concerns about the carbon components and requested more detailed photos, hinting at potential issues. @Romand076 further questioned the cost of replacing cracked carbon fiber pieces. Additionally, @BlackH20 expressed skepticism over the longevity of Porsche’s carbon fiber, comparing it to a previous vehicle and noting repair needs. Overall, there seems to be a cautious undertone regarding the condition and care of specific components.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @kevinckb6 calling it a nice car and @dj_walls2424 praising the body design of a Contemporary Cobra. @Jags_in_the_barn also commented positively about the vehicle’s build, indicating that it looks great. Additionally, @jackenglund (The Seller) engaged with commenters enthusiastically, sharing information and promising to provide a driving video, which suggests a responsive and engaging selling experience.
Neutral: There were a few neutral inquiries primarily focused on details about the vehicle. @davereeves asked about the temperature of the headers, while @infraredcalvin inquired about registration issues and any potential back fees, to which @jackenglund (The Seller) responded positively, reassuring that there were no fees. Questions about the car’s specifications, such as the engine dimensions, and clarification about the wheels also contributed to this neutral tone, as commenters exchanged information and clarification without strong emotional bias.
Negative: On the negative side, @68Vet remarked that the radio might not be audible while driving, suggesting its removal, indicating a potential downside of the vehicle experience. @davereeves questioned why the carpet was cut away on the console, hinting at concerns about the car’s finished quality or details. Such comments point to some dissatisfaction and the need for clarity regarding the vehicle’s condition.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and overall quality. @pianoman1964 remarked on the great photo backdrop the car provides, while @Flashpix compared it favorably to a personal vehicle, appreciating the clean lines of the TR6 without a luggage rack. @275Rigby praised the seller, noting their reputable shop and the car’s far-above-average condition, asserting that it is a true driver’s car and wishing the seller good luck with the sale.
Neutral: Commenters asked questions or made observations that didn’t lean heavily towards positive or negative opinions. @Tonyjoe inquired about the original dual 175 Strombergs, to which @europeancar (The Seller) responded that they did not have the original carbs. @Astonjag sought clarification on an improvement made to the car’s hood, showcasing a genuine interest in the vehicle’s details. Additionally, @miker44 asked about the car’s panel alignment and general functionality, indicating curiosity without outright criticism.
Negative: Some commenters pointed out concerns regarding the car’s condition, highlighting repairs and modifications that could affect its value. @ima68tr mentioned a flat panel repair of the driver’s floor pan as a factor that might suppress bidding, while calling attention to other minor issues like jacking damage and an aftermarket valve cover. @Jaybird_57 criticized the car’s modifications and raised alarms about its maintenance, prompting a defensive response from @europeancar (The Seller), who emphasized the car’s drivability despite these issues. Other users, such as @rileyleclerc, discussed oil pressure concerns, further contributing to an atmosphere of scrutiny around the vehicle’s mechanical status.
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics has presented the 1985 Mercedes-Benz 380SL as a unique and desirable vehicle, asserting that it runs and drives straight while offering transparency about its history. They describe their dealership as high-volume, with a strong customer satisfaction rate evidenced by hundreds of 5-star Google Reviews, highlighting their commitment to smooth and transparent transactions. Additionally, they provide opportunities for inspections and logistics support, further enhancing the purchasing experience.
Neutral: Several potential buyers, including @jaylen4 and @19Willys46, have engaged with @Collectibleclassics to clarify details about the vehicle, such as the location of the VIN, previous damage requiring frame repairs, and additional vehicle specifications. Questions about the car’s air conditioning system and other current needs were raised by @GP65, while @Alikh sought information about mechanical issues such as white smoke from the exhaust and details on top configurations. All comments reflect a genuine interest in understanding more about the vehicle’s condition.
Negative: Concerns have been expressed regarding previous damage to the vehicle, with @19Willys46 specifically asking for clarification on the frame repairs and any images of those damages. @Alikh noted the steady stream of white smoke coming from the exhaust, prompting questions about the car’s mechanical history, including potential issues with the head gasket. Furthermore, @GP65 questioned the functionality of the air conditioning, indicating there may be concerns with the vehicle’s accessibility to reliable cooling or performance.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the unique features of the 918 Spyder, especially its unpainted carbon fiber body, with @boaboyoz calling it “spectacular” and “sexy AF”. Commenters like @DM7 highlighted the car’s outstanding design, stating the side profile is absolutely captivating. @blitzlead deemed it the most stunning unpainted automobile seen on Bring a Trailer (BaT), and several others, including @g2z, voiced their appreciation for its raw and aggressive look, suggesting it could set a new trend in automotive design. @charleetuner humorously noted that the price tag for this stunning specimen would require “FU money,” showcasing the allure and desirability of this vehicle among collectors.
Neutral: Several commenters had neutral or curious stances about the car’s details, with @butane questioning the additional cost associated with its unpainted feature, suggesting it raises the original price significantly. User @alaskossie brought up the practical considerations of bare carbon fiber, asking if it had been sealed to prevent moisture absorption, reflecting on a common concern regarding the maintenance of such unique materials. Additionally, @motorcar_collector expressed his surprise upon learning more about the car’s configuration, indicating that discussions around its specifications and rarity sparked a learning experience for many participants in the comments.
Negative: Despite much of the feedback being positive, there were also some humorous and critical remarks. @quickmx5 questioned the selling point of bare carbon fiber when it is wrapped in matte black, hinting at the contradiction between the car’s appearance and its marketed features. @onlyhonda4me expressed skepticism about the high price for a car without paint, firmly stating, “I’m out”, due to the perceived lack of value. @JettJolene lamented that these cars are often kept in pristine condition rather than driven, illustrating a concern that such exceptional machinery is not being utilized to its full potential, which resonated with some commenters.
|
 |
Positive: Comments reflect a generally positive sentiment towards the vehicle, highlighting its excellent condition despite being used for over 20 years. @Tommy_gunz noted that the rig looks great considering New York’s climate, while @testdummypilot (The Seller) emphasized its maintenance in a climate-controlled garage, assuring buyers of its overall spectacular condition. Additional remarks from the seller suggested the vehicle meets various needs, even for work or motorhome conversions, which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @testdummypilot, addressed inquiries directly, such as defining the condition of the vehicle with no rust issues and explaining its history of low mileage. @RHG357 expressed curiosity about the reasons for the vehicle’s decommission, contributing to the conversation surrounding its background. Furthermore, @jostermi and @Cottoncandy had practical questions regarding interior measurements, showcasing interest in utilitarian potential.
Negative: Comments include some skepticism about the diesel engine’s reliability, with @JoeMommia sharing a personal experience of issues with a similar model, suggesting that these engines may not be ideal under certain conditions. @RHG357 brought up concerns over potential rust problems, although the seller promptly dispelled such worries, indicating a communication gap regarding vehicle condition perceptions. Nevertheless, there was a sense that the seller’s transparent approach helped mitigate these concerns.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle’s modifications have resulted in a respectable 365 RWHP, which is positively acknowledged by @crazyshot97 as a significant gain compared to the investment. @ajhughes34 (The Seller) describes the car as a thrilling ride that garners attention and compliments, making it an enjoyable summer daily driver. The seller expresses confidence that the car could provide both fun and excitement, encouraging bidders with whimsical remarks about taking selfies with the car and enjoying life with it.
Neutral: Comments from @TopEndTrap and others indicate concerns about the clutch’s condition due to the vehicle’s power output, but @ajhughes34 (The Seller) reassures potential buyers that the clutch has been functioning well within its power range. Questions about the exhaust and catalytic converters are also addressed by the seller, who shares the absence of service engine codes and assures potential buyers about the car’s condition. @JosCherry raises points about visual clarity of the vehicle, noting some cleaning runoff which @ajhughes34 promptly rectifies, showing transparency about the vehicle’s condition.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the return on investment for modifications, as highlighted by @Hulk2000, suggesting that the upgrades may not have resulted in a satisfactory power increase relative to their cost. Additionally, @TopEndTrap expresses unease about the clutch’s history, indicating that the lack of documentation from the previous owner might lead to uncertainty. Overall, while the seller presents the car as a fun and enjoyable ride, the mentioned concerns could deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @oxenreiter (The Seller) welcomes potential buyers to the auction of the Renault Clio, expressing a genuine enthusiasm for French cars as this marks his third import. He highlights the fun and quirky nature of the car, while sharing that an award ribbon will accompany the vehicle. @JakePM and @QCMotorsports resonate with this excitement, commenting on the car’s cool seats and engaging performance respectively, which seem to reflect the unique appeal of French automobiles.
Neutral: Several practical inquiries come from potential buyers about the car’s features, like @JoyRide04 asking about the air conditioning and @Frank_Rizzo questioning the condition of the paint under the wrap on the hood. @clueless_jalop provides insight into the car’s possible lack of air conditioning, mentioning the simplistic temperature controls. These comments suggest interest in the vehicle’s practicality alongside its aesthetic and performance qualities.
Negative: Some buyers express concerns about certain aspects of the Clio. @Paul85 notes significant wear on the clutch and brake pedals relative to the vehicle’s mileage, hinting at possible issues from its history. @VintagePete emphasizes the need for basic maintenance like cleaning the headlamps, while @clueless_jalop mentions that the absence of air conditioning could be a deal breaker, reflecting a certain dissatisfaction with the car’s features in the context of comfort.
|
 |
Positive: @RAllen8800 expresses a fondness for the wooden bumper on the vehicle, acknowledging that despite the common dislike for such features, it adds a unique character to the jeep. This shows that there is an appreciation for unconventional design aspects that can enhance the vehicle’s appeal.
Neutral: Comments from @schneidsdale (The Seller) provide factual information regarding the vehicle’s condition. @schneidsdale mentions the heavy brake pedal, suggesting possible maintenance issues like needing a bleed or a new master cylinder. Additionally, they clarify the vehicle’s history as a California/PNW car, emphasizing it has not been driven on salted roads, which could ease concerns about corrosion. @fsacb3 asks for more pictures of the undercarriage to assist potential buyers in assessing the vehicle’s condition, and @BallCoach inquires about videos showcasing the engine’s performance.
Negative: Concerns arise from @rancherman who questions the braking issues, indicating that potential buyers may be wary of the vehicle’s safety and reliability. @schneidsdale acknowledges the brake problem, which could deter buyers. Furthermore, the mention of a glass crack raises additional concerns about the vehicle’s overall condition, as it suggests potential ongoing maintenance needs. @schneidsdale’s difficulty posting videos adds to the uncertainty surrounding the vehicle’s operational state.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle’s overall condition and features. Notably, @berfinroy shared fond memories of owning a similar model, praising the quality and performance of the ’99 GL model. Enthusiastic comments from @Brewinaz highlight the seller’s efforts to ensure the car is ‘turn key,’ ready for a new owner without any immediate concerns. Additionally, @packet, who owns a similar vehicle, complimented the Cabrio’s color and trim, further emphasizing its appeal.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarifications on specific mechanical details and functionality. @Scout60 inquired about the cruise control and other working mechanisms of the vehicle, while @WaldoOC expressed curiosity about the costs related to the inoperative ABS module and potential repair options. @Scottcake also requested information regarding the clutch’s condition and the operational status of the electric top, indicating that these nuances are important to potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding certain functionalities of the vehicle. @Scout60 pointed out that the cruise control was mentioned as a possible issue in the listing. Additionally, @WaldoOC referenced the ABS module not functioning, highlighting a potential repair cost that might deter buyers. @GBRBill noted that central locking parts are hard to come by, suggesting that some features may pose challenges for future maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praise the vehicle for its appealing color combination of blue on silver, noting that it’s a gorgeous car. @95RioSnake highlights this color combo as very nice, while @fwsizemore expresses love for the same features. Even the seller, @Jeff1932, emphasizes its near-perfect condition and assures potential buyers that it’s been adult owned with relatively low mileage, describing it as too much car for himself. He encourages bidders to feel confident and enjoy the auction experience.
Neutral: Comments provide additional information about the car and its features. @ChevySalesman inquires about the installation of a gauge, to which @Jeff1932 responds, explaining that the original owner added it for visibility at high speeds. He further details how the gauge is removable without damage to the dash. @MAMCG reflects on their own experience owning a similar vehicle, underscoring the demand and retail price when new, while also wishing luck on the sale of this car.
Negative: While most comments are positive or neutral, @Sunbeamdon diverts the conversation with a vague critique directed at @Longmire45’s admiration for Jay Leno, suggesting skepticism about his true motivations for enjoying cars without addressing the vehicle itself. This comment stands out as less favorable compared to the enthusiastic remarks about the car’s value and desirability.
|
 |
Positive: @Smittys1 (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a super clean truck, emphasizing its preserved original paint. Additionally, the vehicle appears to be mechanically sound, featuring a new motor and fuel tank, along with nearly new tires which enhances its appeal. The seller also notes that it runs and drives well, which is a positive indication for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several questions arise about the vehicle’s features and logistics. @Mgossage inquires about shipping logistics, and @Babbler asks for details regarding the A/C system’s functionality. In response, @Smittys1 (The Seller) acknowledges the uncertainty surrounding the A/C and mentions that potential shipping options could depend on the buyers’ plans for transportation.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the vehicle’s roadworthiness for long trips, with @bkoz52 questioning its reliability for a 1,000-mile journey due to the age of the pickup. @Smittys1 (The Seller) admits that while the vehicle has been updated mechanically, there are unfinished repairs, and certain features like the wipers and horn are not functioning, adding uncertainty about its preparedness for extended travel.
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) has provided extensive documentation to assure potential buyers about the vehicle’s condition. They have included a variety of videos demonstrating the car’s functionality, from driving and cold starts to detailed inspections of the electrical systems and body imperfections. This thorough approach helps buyers gauge the car’s current state, suggesting that it is functioning as intended despite any previous issues.
Neutral: @WickedAce and @Mazdaseeker have raised valid questions regarding the vehicle’s history, particularly in relation to its Lemon Law repurchase status. They are interested in further specifics about past repairs and problems, indicating a desire for transparency regarding the car’s history and any warranties that may apply. @iangail notes the occurrence of certain irregularities reported on a platform, highlighting the need for clarification on these points to better inform potential buyers.
Negative: @Jtstoy has expressed concern over the severe problems reported by the state Department of Motor Vehicles, questioning the seller about the nature of these issues. This comment underscores a level of apprehension among potential buyers about the vehicle’s reliability and safety, implying that the seller needs to address these serious concerns to alleviate fears and build confidence in the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @nexusautobrokers expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its SIX SPEED transmission. @johnbennett103 praises its pristine condition and low mileage, alongside the desirable six-speed feature, while also noting the visual advantages of the four-door model. Additionally, @lhunt shares a positive experience with their own 2009 M3, underscoring the vehicle’s fantastic performance and ride quality, suggesting confidence in maintaining it further.
Neutral: @EntropyIncrease raises questions about the vehicle’s oil analysis and rod bearing replacements, showing a concern for long-term maintenance. The seller, @Rushdjamal, addresses inquiries about smog checks and shipping options, confirming recent compliance and willingness to assist with logistics. Discussions about repairs hinted at in reports, as presented by @tonycstech, also indicate ongoing interest in vehicle history and condition, with @clean_machina bringing attention to minor imperfections and features needing clarification.
Negative: Comments from @Yeezers and @EntropyIncrease reflect skepticism about the car, questioning potential damages and maintenance histories like the presence of a cracked front bumper and lack of rod bearing replacements. @clean_machina points out several potential cosmetic issues, including dents and cracks that may need attention. Overall, there are concerns regarding previous repairs and the overall condition, which create doubts for some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @BSer expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting its rarity as a 175HP dually with slicks and a stick shift, showcasing a unique appeal. @KingofKustom (The Seller) highlighted the custom painting in Lamborghini Orange with gold pearl and assured potential buyers of the truck’s reliability, stating that it runs well and that both the transmission and engine function smoothly. The seller is confident about the truck’s performance, inviting interested buyers to inspect it in person for a better appreciation of its aesthetics and functionality.
Neutral: @KingofKustom (The Seller) provided detailed information about the vehicle’s condition, mentioning specific issues such as the illuminated airbag and brake lights, which stem from modifications made. The seller pointed out the common noise issue with the interior HVAC fan but indicated no immediate plans for replacement, emphasizing that the problem is typical for these trucks. The truck was notable for its multiple replacements, including a new radiator and brake master cylinder, ensuring potential buyers are informed of its mechanical state.
Negative: While @KingofKustom (The Seller) addressed some issues with the truck, the presence of warning lights for the airbag and parking brake might raise concerns for potential buyers about the vehicle’s overall safety and readiness. The seller acknowledged the HVAC noise issue but appeared to downplay its significance without offering a solution, which may deter some bidders. The condition and age of parts along with the need for additional adjustments could suggest more ongoing maintenance might be needed after purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @Collins4A appreciates the vehicle’s beauty, calling it pure and stunning. @saa106 echoes this sentiment, labeling it pure Porsche, while @davidhunternyc reminisces about a time when design prioritized beauty over speed. Overall, the comments highlight the vehicle’s aesthetic appeal with many expressing envy towards its owner and admiration for its restoration. Enthusiasts like @LouFifer and @56PackardMan emphasize the car’s analog driving experience, contrasting it favorably with modern flashy designs, encapsulating a sense of nostalgia and admiration for the craftsmanship behind early Porsche models.
Neutral: Several commenters request more technical information about the vehicle, such as @rgupta250, who asks about the details of the engine and chassis restoration. @Lodgeskins and @Frida also express interest in additional pictures and video content to further showcase the car’s condition and performance post-restoration. @ChrisBarba, the seller, responds to these inquiries by providing detailed information about the restoration process and specifications of the vehicle, which helps maintain intrigue while also contributing to the transparency of the auction.
Negative: There are some critical remarks regarding details of the vehicle. @prs points out potential concerns with the condition of sun visors and the windshield washer bag, questioning its completeness. Another commenter, @vrover_356 notes an assembly oversight regarding the transmission, indicating a bolt that was not tightened properly. The concerns about the vehicle’s restoration process demonstrate that while there is much appreciation, potential buyers remain vigilant about the car’s authenticity and restoration quality.
|
 |
Positive: @Hammer107 praised the quality restoration of the car, noting that from just a few pictures, one can see the attention to detail and craftsmanship. @Dvredc5 complimented the flawless body work and paint job, suggesting that whoever did it is an artist, especially acknowledging the difficulty in maintaining perfection on a black car. @Platinum71 (The Seller) responded to several queries about the vehicle, confidently declaring the paint and body as 10/10 and providing detailed explanations of the features, assuring potential buyers of the car’s quality and condition.
Neutral: Comments showed a mix of admiration and personal preferences. @Kumiteken mentioned their need for a manual transmission and complimented the car, while @ssterry expressed both agreement with others about the aesthetic choices for wheels and headlights and a concern about altering an original Super Sport. @Adammarshall1983 raised questions about the headers on the car but indicated their interest in the vehicle remained high, stating it was merely a clarifying inquiry. @JRPJR inquired about potential repairs during the restoration process, showing a cautious approach to the vehicle’s history.
Negative: Some comments reflected disappointment regarding certain styling choices. @Piros1, alongside others like @Carfisher13, expressed a desire to change the wheels and headlights, believing they did not suit a 1970’s muscle car aesthetic. @ssterry lamented the decision to modify an original Super Sport instead of using a different vehicle for restoration, emphasizing that these cars are becoming rare. @bkeaton also questioned the presence of any unseen issues with the paint or body, hinting at skepticism about its perfect condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express their admiration for the 2005 Mercedes-Benz E320 CDI, highlighting its strong performance and fuel efficiency. @jimlam56 mentions owning three CDIs and praises the vehicle’s impressive pulling power and highway cruising capabilities, citing its range of at least 600 miles per tank. @austin_alfa shares their experience of driving a CDI for eight years, noting its reliability, excellent build quality, and achieving 37 mpg while maintaining comfort on long drives. @ReimelMC echoes similar sentiments, describing the smooth ride, fuel economy, and overall satisfaction with the car, even regretting selling it for a more modern option.
Neutral: The seller, @1600veloce, emphasizes their dedication to providing detailed listings and quality assurance for potential buyers. They mention the importance of scheduling appointments for viewings and highlight their facility’s climate-controlled storage for vehicles. Questions from prospective buyers, such as mileage discrepancies raised by @sanreddybi and @Dieseljoe, are addressed directly by the seller, confirming the accuracy of the vehicle’s mileage and providing reassurance to interested bidders. Additionally, inquiries about the condition of specific features, like the sound system and interior, are met with positive feedback from the seller regarding the car’s overall condition.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the vehicle’s mileage history, with comments from @sanreddybi and @Dieseljoe questioning the discrepancy between the odometer reading and the Carfax report. @rideair also raises potential issues about the condition of the passenger seat and any possible headliner sagging. Although @1600veloce reassures buyers about the vehicle’s well-maintained state, these inquiries highlight some apprehension among potential bidders about the car’s history and condition.
|
 |
Positive: @02fanatic shared a positive experience after buying a similar model, emphasizing that having been in an accident doesn’t automatically make a car a ‘lemon’. They praised the rarity of the color and noted that they had a great experience with their vehicle, even mentioning the strong warranty provided by the dealer. @HeavyTank77 contributed a fun aspect of the MINI community, highlighting an event dedicated to MINI enthusiasts, which adds value to the car’s ownership experience. @iakllc, the seller, engaged with commenters providing details on vehicle conditions and reassurances about specific inquiries.
Neutral: Comments from @jcruss69 and @drbill201 focused on understanding specific aspects of the vehicle’s history, particularly relating to the ‘Attention’ sticker and VIN confirmation for repairs—questions that suggest they are considering the car but need reassurance on certain details. Additionally, @autoheart and @oldcarjunky requested more visual evidence and documentation, which is a common practice among buyers curious about the vehicle’s condition. @JCW-S1232 noted the vehicle’s potential as a DIY project, adding a practical perspective for prospective buyers.
Negative: Some comments pointed to concerns about the car’s condition requiring attention, such as @Meha11’s inquiry regarding the strut towers’ red paint and whether the car had been repainted, raising red flags about the vehicle’s history. @hcalreg’s comment about potential rust issues and the need for information on whether existing rust is concerning added to the negative perception. Furthermore, @Schnoz warned about possible electrical issues that could affect the vehicle’s reliability in the future, which prompted further questions about the car’s operational aspects.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters find the vehicle a fascinating project with significant potential. @ltchip expresses excitement about the auction, calling it a fun venture, while @SlowNRusty notes it as a labor of love, perfect for someone with time and patience. @JGraham highlights the rarity of the vehicle’s color, Iberian red, enhancing its appeal. @MichaelsMotorCarsPA (The Seller) receives appreciation for their dedication to restoring vintage BMWs, demonstrating the car’s promising aspects and the enthusiasm behind the bid process.
Neutral: Some comments reflect on the vehicle’s parts and modifications without too much judgment. @Hywyflyr notes it may be better to focus on the powertrain and suggests parting out the project if it’s too complex. @m-tuner shares insights from their own restoration experience but doesn’t shy away from noting the potential challenges of assembling this vehicle. @mpower0254 provides details about the modification impacts, indicating that while the vehicle has some non-original components, it still represents a solid project for the right buyer.
Negative: Criticism arises surrounding aspects of the vehicle’s restoration and originality. @Mike expresses concern about the lack of AC components typical of Euro cars, hinting at potential compromises in the project. @olidon worries his own vehicle restoration might lead to a similar fate as this one, pointing towards challenges many builders face. @Packard374 expresses surprise over the lack of a no-reserve auction, inferring some doubts about the vehicle’s desirability. Ultimately, @sadtoseeitgo shares a personal note about the vehicle’s sale due to a medical condition, underlining the emotional weight of the auction and the missed opportunities to enjoy the restoration journey.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, noting its stunning color combination and performance upgrades. @Dollycat3 described it as ‘absolute stunning,’ while @boaboyoz called it a ‘very tasty Tuxedo Black Impala’ and praised the amazing build. The seller, @motorcarmarketusa, conveyed their enthusiasm for the car, stating it was built by an enthusiastic owner and inviting respectful commentary. Furthermore, @lincolnsandcaddies echoed the sentiment with a heartfelt, ‘Stunning!!!!! what a beauty!!! best wishes!!!’ highlighting the general appreciation for the vehicle’s aesthetics.
Neutral: Comments also reflected a sense of nostalgia and personal connections to the 1959 Impala. @sws615 shared a memory of their earlier ownership of a black 1959 Impala, while @FlyPanther reminisced about their own favorite convertible from youth. Both commenters highlighted the car’s history and charm, which contributed to a shared fondness among enthusiasts. The seller reiterated the importance of respectful discourse regarding differing views on the vehicle’s customizations, emphasizing the open forum nature of the discussion.
Negative: On the other hand, some comments raised criticisms about specific modifications. @mcorrallo expressed aversion to the continental kit on the 1959 Impala, arguing that it detracted from the dramatic stock rear end. This sentiment was echoed by @FlyPanther, who also insisted the kit should be removed. Additionally, @dd9 posed concerns about potential modifications for hydraulic systems, questioning the car’s frame integrity due to the extensive engraving, further indicating that not all changes are viewed favorably among purists.
|
 |
Positive: @Bmarcum expresses admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its appearance and suggesting that it is well-prepared for enjoyment as is or potential modifications. They show interest in the sound system, comparing it to their own experience with temporary speakers in another model.
Neutral: @BigWings inquires about any cosmetic issues the vehicle may have, seeking further details about the paint, interior, and engine specifics, reflecting a general need for clarity on the car’s overall condition.
Negative: @tjvct (The Seller) acknowledges the inquiries and assures that the provided pictures accurately represent the vehicle’s interior and exterior condition, yet there are no negative comments addressing concerns or faults.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors have expressed appreciation for the seller’s clear communication and transparency regarding the vehicle sale. @motoexoticastl has emphasized their willingness to address any questions or concerns from potential buyers, which has been positively received. The fact that the car is up for auction with no reserve has also been noted as a favorable condition, encouraging bidders to participate actively in the auction process.
Neutral: Some comments have been more informational, discussing the specifics of the vehicle. Several users have asked for details such as the car’s maintenance history and overall condition, indicating a common interest among bidders to ensure they are making a sound investment. @motoexoticastl has offered assistance in answering these inquiries, reflecting a proactive stance to engage with the community and provide necessary information.
Negative: A few comments have raised concerns about the reason for selling the vehicle, mentioning the estate sale aspect. Some bidders have expressed hesitance around purchasing a vehicle tied to personal loss, which may impact their bidding willingness. However, @motoexoticastl has responded to these concerns thoughtfully, assuring potential buyers of the vehicle’s quality and their commitment to a smooth transaction.
|
 |
Positive: @DavidB33 describes the vehicle as one of the most beautiful Range Rovers of all time, praising its overall design and performance. @Schunnyman echoes this sentiment, stating it has a beautiful spec and noting the comfort of riding in the backseat. Additionally, @Bigtonybtti1 mentions the vehicle’s impressive specifications, including $18k in paint options, contributing to its allure.
Neutral: @BMWCleveland provides clarification regarding the vehicle’s powertrain, noting that while it is an SV, it is the standard version for the 2023 model year and not the 615hp version that will be released for 2024. @bringatrailer acknowledges @BMWCleveland’s input and mentions that the listing has been updated accordingly. Furthermore, @Bigtonybtti1 responds to questions about the maintenance performed on the vehicle, including spark plug replacements and oil changes, as part of the standard service schedule.
Negative: Some comments raised questions about maintenance practices, such as @Oldwoodie1927 asking why the spark plugs were replaced at only 4,600 miles. @WaltBleser questions the necessity of replacing the sunroof glass, which was attributed to damage from the previous owner by @Bigtonybtti1. These questions could imply concerns over the vehicle’s previous care and whether it had any underlying issues.
|
 |
Positive: @shawnf. (The Seller) confirmed that the vehicle has original tires and possesses the window sticker and regency certificate, which adds value and reassurance to potential buyers.
Neutral: @thirdcoast7691 inquired about the years Chevrolet utilized a specific fuel management option, to which @chevyguy9906 replied that it started in 2007 with the Silverado and Sierra models, clarifying the timeline for interested parties.
Negative: No definitive negative comments were presented in the discussions regarding the vehicle’s condition or features, though there seemed to be some confusion about specific details that may concern potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Allday7 (The Seller) emphasizes the reliability and long-lasting nature of the vehicle, sharing personal experiences with a similar car that reached over 328,000 miles without significant issues. He also reassures potential buyers about the car’s maintenance history, highlighting that crucial components like the timing belt, water pump, and brake system have been replaced at 52,235 miles. Overall, the seller’s confidence in the car’s performance and history is apparent, which can enhance buyer trust.
Neutral: Several comments, including those from @UscPhd97_ and @MikeNoLomotel, seek clarification on specific details such as the wear date on the tires and the condition of other belts. @Zork1 expresses curiosity about the legality of the window tint but ultimately agrees that the vehicle is impressive. @Nibo expresses a wistful appreciation for the car’s potential longevity for future drivers. These queries and comments indicate a general interest in the car but also an awareness of necessary details for serious consideration.
Negative: There are no significant negative comments regarding the vehicle, but @Zork1 notes that the window tint might not comply with legal standards in some areas, which could be a concern for prospective buyers. Additionally, @MikeNoLomotel highlights uncertainty about the overall service history beyond the documented repairs, suggesting that the lack of comprehensive information may deter some buyers. However, these concerns are not overwhelmingly negative and could be addressed by the seller.
|
 |
Positive: @39mercman expressed admiration for the rear suspension of the vehicle, noting it as a “mind blower” and wishing to see a video demonstrating the suspension’s capabilities. They also pointed out that the suspension appears to be adjustable, indicating enthusiasm for its features.
Neutral: @ferrovecchio (The Seller) responded to @39mercman with informative details about the friction disc shock absorbers, explaining how their damping force is adjusted and the mechanism behind it. They also addressed @chromedome’s inquiry regarding import paperwork, confirming the motorcycle’s status as never titled in the U.S. and outlining the documentation they possess, including foreign registration and a Bill of Sale.
Negative: @chromedome raised concerns about the vehicle’s paperwork, specifically querying whether the frame number matches the engine number and requesting information about the import documentation required for registration in Connecticut. This indicates some hesitation regarding the vehicle’s legality and registration status.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the condition and appearance of the vehicle, noting it looks too good and is described as a cool vintage bus that attracts a lot of attention on the road. @KevinMcQueeney acknowledged the driving video provided by @997RUF (The Seller), indicating an appreciation for the updates during the auction. The seller also reassured potential buyers about the vehicle’s history, highlighting the maintenance work done by reputable sources and sharing its unique background tied to the Coca-Cola Company, which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: There were several inquiries regarding specific details about the vehicle, particularly about the engine size and starting/driving videos. @jpr pointed out the absence of vital motor information, referencing previous listings to highlight the importance of engine details. @TurtleVan also asked for clarification on a specific part of the vehicle’s finish, showing interest in understanding its condition better. Overall, these comments reflect a cautious optimism among potential buyers, seeking more information before making a decision.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concern over the lack of information regarding the engine size, with @jpr mentioning that it is a significant factor in any bus sale. @broodie noted that the engine size was not listed in previous sales, raising caution about the vehicle’s transparency. Additionally, @KevinMcQueeney voiced frustration about the delay in driving videos, suggesting some uncertainty about the vehicle’s functionality. These comments indicate that while the bus has appealing aspects, potential buyers want more clarity to feel confident in their investment.
|
 |
Positive: @Jags_in_the_barn appreciates the vehicle’s powerful performance and design, likening it to a non-winged sprint car with attributes like a short wheelbase and big tires that enhance driving pleasure. @Discobob finds the vehicle thrilling, believing it has impressive speed and a fun factor that’s likely to be exhilarating. @Capt.Bob, having owned multiple Stalkers, commends the car for its aesthetics and advanced features like Penske shocks, highlighting its potential as a ‘hooligan machine’ that is enjoyable to drive. He further notes the car’s refinements and potential for a good aerodynamic setup, making it an appealing choice for enthusiasts looking for a lively ride.
Neutral: @CraigMBZ (The Seller) responds to inquiries about the car’s chassis number, revealing that it is on the CA plate. He confirms that the car’s traction control system is non-functional according to the owner but describes it as surprisingly compliant despite its power-to-weight ratio. @Scootybizzle seeks clarification on the car controls and features, displaying specific interest in the parking brake and electronic systems, while @KevinFielding shares his positive experience with a similar model, indicating that handling is superb and highlighting the car’s lightweight performance attributes.
Negative: @sweetleon raises concerns about the non-functional traction control system, questioning its implications on driving safety considering the vehicle’s power-weight ratio. @PeterMiles queries the removal of the line lock, suggesting potential issues with the vehicle’s functionality. Acknowledging the need for careful handling, @Chuckha62 humorously remarks that traction control may not be necessary, but hints that driving the vehicle will require skill, thus revealing potential challenges for less experienced drivers.
|
 |
Positive: @Barryward commented on the vehicle’s appearance stating it’s a great looking Camaro. @Kaulp (The Seller) recommended viewers watch the montage video to appreciate the car’s features. @oqi625 praised the tasteful modifications, specifically mentioning the effective vintage air conditioning and the unique fire extinguisher, while also expressing interest in the vehicle’s performance. @funkaholik noted the beautiful satin black Rally wheels that fit the car’s vibe perfectly, commending the decision to avoid unnecessary SS badges. @Kaulp (The Seller) reaffirmed the car’s excellent air conditioning and promised to upload better audio capturing the engine sounds.
Neutral: @innertrader criticized the montage video, arguing it primarily featured music rather than engine sounds, reflecting a desire for a more authentic representation of the vehicle’s performance. @cjobrien pointed out a potential error in the description regarding the headlights, asking if the car features a conversion kit. @deshelto inquired about available suspension and undercarriage photos. @Royce59 echoed the need for more driving videos without music, focusing on the engine sound instead, and also requested chassis pictures.
Negative: @innertrader expressed hesitation about the price and mentioned being deterred from purchasing due to the lack of engaging audio in the video. @ChuckH questioned the description of power windows given the presence of roll-up handles, raising concerns about the vehicle’s specifications. @captain408 asked for videos of the car on a lift, suggesting a desire for more visual evidence of the car’s condition and features. Overall, there were requests for clearer information and proof regarding the vehicle’s performance and components.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has generated excitement among potential buyers and commenters, with remarks celebrating its unique design and capabilities. @boaboyoz expressed admiration by noting the tank as a ‘tremendous T-54’ and complimented its rarity in North America. Others, like @TommyBruin, found humor and charm in its potential use in urban settings, suggesting it would create interesting scenarios in a city like Brooklyn. The auction atmosphere is energetic, with users envisioning fun possibilities for the tank, such as using it in demolition derbies or as a striking statement vehicle.
Neutral: Comments ranged widely from practical inquiries about the tank’s condition and specifications to lighthearted banter. @geardheadcharles discussed the vehicle’s military history, while other users brought up logistics regarding shipping and storage. @Bulletmotorsportsinc, the seller, provided detailed responses to questions about auction rules, storage fees, and the process of acquiring the tank, further engaging the audience. A sense of community emerged as bidders shared their stories and humorous comments, maintaining a playful yet informative dialogue about the auction and the vehicle’s features.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism, particularly regarding the tank’s practicality and suitability for road use. @Calstickshift humorously questioned whether it would pass emissions standards in California, while others pointed out potential legal and logistical challenges in owning such a vehicle. @pbf777 cautioned about the high costs associated with operating a tank on public roads, emphasizing the doubts surrounding registrations and modifications needed to make the vehicle road-legal. The overall perception conveyed a mix of curiosity and apprehension regarding the actual utility of the tank as a purchase.
|
17×9″ and 17×10″ RUF Wheels by OZ Racing for Porsche
Set of Four 17″ RUF Wheels
Lot 204272
Private Party
 |
Positive: @davenichols highlights the classic appeal of the wheels, stating that they are a design that never goes out of style. @JSNY agrees, calling them one of the nicest designs of automotive wheels. @Competitioncars (The Seller) also emphasizes their timeless look and mentions that they have never been out of the box, enhancing their desirability for collectors and enthusiasts. Many users express anticipation and excitement about the auction and the unveiling of these NOS wheels, indicating a positive reception among potential buyers.
Neutral: @Aliniguez inquires whether the wheels will fit an ’88 911 widebody, pointing to a consideration for fitment that several users are discussing. @Jaredsalinsky raises a concern about the potential shipping costs to the east coast, highlighting logistical questions that are common among buyers. @BeachBoy18 asks about the differences between two specific wheel manufacturers, which shows an interest in the details of the product without passing judgment on the wheels themselves.
Negative: There are some uncertainties expressed by users regarding fitment and production details. @ricos questions the production date of the wheels and mentions that the necessary details are difficult to read in the provided images, suggesting a potential issue with clarity and presentation. @bharslem seeks to know if spacers are required for 930 fitment, indicating a concern over compatibility. @grkmf3 is uncertain about fitting the wheels on a ’77 Porsche 911S, showcasing apprehension from users about whether the product may meet their specific needs.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its beautiful color and overall condition. @t65tampa described it simply as a beautiful car, while @permanentglue appreciated its cleanliness and @SDCR noted that it is one of the best colors for the NA Miata. The Merlot color was specifically highlighted by @rosslig, who complimented its stunning deep purple-red hue. @Kidkjellin mentioned the presence of an ABS brake system as a significant plus. The seller, @westtxmx5, highlighted the vehicle’s long ownership and regular maintenance by his father-in-law, emphasizing the joy it has brought him over the years.
Neutral: Several commenters had neutral observations regarding the specifics of the vehicle’s condition and background. For example, @Bob_MX5 asked the seller about the replacement of the passenger side front fender, noting the missing VIN tag could indicate past damage. The seller confirmed that a deer had hit the fender around 2006, providing context to the repair. Commenters shared their experiences with similar models, with @htrinkman inquiring about the car as a potential first vehicle for her son. @mr2_maniac and @analoglp both provided pros and cons of the NA Miata as a first car, weighing its reliability against potential safety concerns in the current driving environment.
Negative: Some negative comments emerged surrounding concerns about the vehicle’s condition. @livid1994 noted clear coat failure, questioning if it was factory applied, while @Slushie1998 inquired about rust and the non-functional air conditioning, which has not been serviced. @militarydave35 asked about potential leaks from major seals, indicating apprehension about mechanical issues. @dnsnguy08 questioned the status of major service items like the timing belt and water pump. Furthermore, @Scarlet65 incorrectly noted that NA Miatas generally did not have ABS, creating some confusion around its features. Overall, there were hints of uncertainty regarding the vehicle’s complete mechanical reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @kjl85 expresses confidence in the vehicle’s condition, vouching for the seller’s maintenance of the car and its rarity. They assure that the car drives as well as it looks, promising satisfaction to the future owner. Furthermore, @ChappellCars, acting as the seller, provides detailed responses to buyer inquiries, indicating a willingness to share information and maintain transparency about the vehicle’s history.
Neutral: The seller, @ChappellCars, addresses inquiries regarding the vehicle’s service history and accident records. They clarify that there is no warranty service history indicating rod bearing replacements and mention discrepancies related to mileage reports. They offer to conduct a paint thickness test, revealing their proactive approach to addressing potential buyer concerns and providing additional visuals upon request, like closeup pictures of the rear section of the vehicle.
Negative: @captjoe and @Camaro2lt raise concerns about the vehicle’s service history and the lack of documentation for the rod bearings being replaced, which could create apprehension among potential buyers. @Segura911 requests further details about the car’s accident report and repairs, highlighting the importance of thorough documentation and transparency. Additionally, @highlineclassics points out a specific issue with the top of the vehicle, indicating that some parts need replacing, which could deter buyers looking for a flawless condition.
|
4,700-Mile 2001 Chevrolet Camaro Intimidator SS Coupe 6-Speed
2G1FP22G412140900
Lot 204278
Private Party
 |
Positive: @AlwaysFBody noted that the vehicle is a very rare GMMG built Dale SS, highlighting its uniqueness, especially with T-Tops which only 33 units were made. @docstoye (The Seller) confirmed that this vehicle came with the desirable removable roof panels, making it even more special. Additionally, @docstoye expressed enthusiasm about how fun the car is to drive, emphasizing its enjoyment factor. @Intimidator04 commented on the distinctiveness of the GMMG modifications, suggesting that these vehicles appeal to collectors due to their rarity and performance enhancements.
Neutral: @FLDrJoe requested additional information about the vehicle’s condition, including paint damages, tire date codes, and if there was original documentation available. @docstoye (The Seller) responded by stating the old tires would be included with the sale and that the bubbling on the paint was a factory issue rather than due to rust, which needed no alteration to keep the car’s value. @docstoye also provided clarity about the car’s original tires and confirmed the presence of a second key fob, reassuring potential buyers about the vehicle’s essentials and condition.
Negative: @98WS6 expressed skepticism regarding the 46 hp increase attributed solely to intake and exhaust upgrades, questioning the accuracy of the claims without other performance modifications. They believe the horsepower estimate seems overblown without further supporting evidence. @Motor_Fast also pointed out common issues with paint bubbling noted in the car’s sail panel and questioned the undercarriage’s coating condition, indicating possible long-term issues with the vehicle’s integrity.
|
28k-Mile Polar Silver Metallic 2005 Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet 6-Speed
WP0CA29925S755816
Lot 204276
Dealer
 |
Positive: Commenters are expressing admiration for the Polar Silver color of the 911 Cabriolet, highlighting it as a unique and appealing feature. @boaboyoz described the car as ‘totally fab’ and a ‘scintillating specimen,’ indicating that the color enhances its allure. @Kishote also praised the Polar Silver, describing it as a ‘more pure silver with a touch of blue’ and commending the overall experience that the 997 series offers, emphasizing the car’s excellence.
Neutral: The seller of the vehicle, @Collectibleclassics, provided detailed information about the auction process and the vehicle’s features. They assured potential bidders of transparent transactions and excellent customer service, boasting a high rating in Google Reviews. There were also inquiries from interested users regarding technical details of the vehicle, such as the engine number and mileage, which @Collectibleclassics addressed by directing users to the auction listing and paperwork.
Negative: Some comments expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle’s mileage, with @Chavric1 questioning the reported 40,000 miles and suggesting a possible discrepancy with service records. @Collectibleclassics acknowledged the issue, attributing it to a clerical error by the service facility and reassuring users that it was corrected before submission to Carfax. The conversation also reflected some tension, with @moorecp’s comment being flagged as non-constructive, showcasing differing opinions among the commenters.
|
 |
Positive: @southhanover (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm for the auction, indicating a willingness to engage with potential buyers by welcoming questions and promising videos of the vehicle. @southhanover (The Seller) also mentions that they have driven the truck for over 5000 miles since purchasing it in May 2024 without any issues, highlighting the vehicle’s reliability and pleasure to drive.
Neutral: @watergate528 remarks on the vehicle’s interesting background without revealing any strong opinion about its quality. @OhioRoots10 asks for clarification regarding a Carfax error related to mileage, showing an interest in the vehicle’s history while expressing concern over the listing’s accuracy. @richbarcellona questions whether the truck has an aftermarket dash cover, indicating a desire for more specific information about its parts.
Negative: @OhioRoots10 raises concerns about an apparent Carfax error that has yet to be corrected before listing the truck, which may lead to doubts about the vehicle’s authenticity and transparency regarding its condition. This comment suggests a potential risk for buyers wary of inaccuracies in vehicle history. @richbarcellona’s inquiry about the aftermarket dash cover could imply skepticism regarding the vehicle’s originality or maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle’s impressive build quality and attention to detail. @cascade_classics commented on the incredible craftsmanship, indicating a level of detail that inspires others. @thiswildbronco echoed this sentiment with a thumbs-up, expressing excitement for future videos showcasing the vehicle. @Giddie-Up praised the unique courage to modify the fenders, while @KTDreemz also highlighted the bronco’s aesthetic appeal, labeling it an absolute looker. The seller, @67numberfive, concurred with these remarks, noting the exceptional quality and smooth functionality of the build, further inviting followers to engage with future content.
Neutral: A few commenters asked practical questions and requested additional information about the vehicle. @4ma inquired about photos without the top, while @joeracer69 raised concerns over the absence of windshield wipers, emphasizing that such a feature might be necessary for state inspection. The seller responded to these questions, stating that windshield wipers could be added and provided topless pictures as requested. Other neutral discussions included inquiries about the vehicle’s height, with @Jlerosen asking for specifics, which the seller promptly clarified, stating it stands just under 80 inches tall.
Negative: Some comments highlighted potential shortcomings and concerns regarding the Bronco. @joeracer69 expressed doubts about the vehicle’s performance in wet conditions due to the lack of windshield wipers, suggesting it might hinder off-road capabilities. This concern led to suggestions about adapting the vehicle with necessary features, indicating that while the build was admired, it was not without its practical issues. However, these remarks did not overshadow the overall positive reception of the Bronco, with other comments focusing more on its stunning looks and high-quality craftsmanship.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters believe that the vehicle is a rare find, particularly for its low 66k miles, as most diesels are known to have much higher mileage. @bdavt excitedly describes it as a ‘unicorn,’ highlighting its unique value. Another user, @allmeads, praises the longevity, torque, and fuel efficiency of diesels, emphasizing that despite potential emission control repairs, the overall maintenance costs are worth it for the benefits, making the Cayenne a great investment. Additionally, the seller, @GRiehl, has received positive feedback regarding their auction processes, with @BoJones sharing a smooth experience and recommending the seller for future transactions.
Neutral: The comments indicate a thorough interest in the specifics of the vehicle. @A_Dopo inquires about a voicemail related to the seller’s temporary absence, expressing concern for their well-being. @ZBear77 asks for clarification about a duplicate Florida title, wanting to ensure the title’s status is clear and free of issues. The seller, @GRiehl, promptly addresses these questions, providing reassurance about the title condition and encouraging potential buyers to inspect the vehicle thoroughly.
Negative: There are some concerns among commenters about the vehicle’s past. @cristma requests more information regarding a damage incident and the repairs, noting that it should be straightforward to obtain for a one-owner vehicle. @Uby67vw1958 expresses concern over having only one key fob. Additionally, @apntra mentions they couldn’t find the videos meant to showcase the vehicle, which could indicate a lack of accessible information that some potential buyers expect. These negative comments highlight certain uncertainties and a need for further details surrounding the vehicle’s condition and documentation.
|
 |
Positive: @rcavictor noted that the vehicle looks like a good candidate for restoration, and @9_Vairs echoed this sentiment, highlighting that despite some discrepancies, it has solid foundations for a project. @Midlifeclassiccars (The Seller) appreciated the nice comments and showcased the vehicle’s solid body condition with only minor surface rust. They demonstrated how easily the rust could be remedied, which indicates that the vehicle requires minimal prep for painting. @PhilVair also mentioned the enjoyment potential of the vehicle, suggesting buyers could drive it while addressing some minor oil leaks.
Neutral: Discussion on the vehicle’s specifications revealed some confusion regarding its electrical system. @Yomamma pointed out the mention of a conversion to a 12-volt system from 6 volts, which @PhilVair and @9_Vairs clarified, noting that Corvairs were never 6 volts and suggested the comment referred to an alternator upgrade. @Thanson contributed by noting the spare engine appears to be from a turbo vehicle, while also confirming the type of transmission the Rampside originally had. Additionally, the vehicle was found to have a mix of parts from different models, like the Pontic gauge mentioned by @9_Vairs, which could be of interest to potential buyers.
Negative: While the comments about the vehicle were largely positive, concerns regarding the mileage and authenticity were noted by @9_Vairs, who pointed out that the dash appears to have been swapped and questioned the accuracy of the mileage reported. They also observed other modifications that suggest the vehicle’s original identity might be compromised. Additionally, @PhilVair mentioned that the vehicle has some oil leaks, which might deter potential buyers who are concerned about maintenance issues. Furthermore, the search for original parts and potential mismatches indicates some restoration challenges ahead.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed a deep admiration for the McLaren P1, noting its stunning green carbon exterior and unique specifications. @R0cket7777 and @G2Z remarked on the appeal of the color, with the latter calling it ‘gorgeousness’ and emphasizing its striking design elements. @Jasonshepp exclaimed that it possesses ‘the sexiest lines’ among the ‘Holy Trinity’ of supercars, and @boaboyoz called it ‘spectacular’ and ‘cool.’ Similarly, @silverarrowcarsltd, the seller, highlighted the car’s exceptional status and service history, accentuating its performance and appeal in the luxury car market.
Neutral: Several comments reflected on the car’s history and technical details, such as its battery life and repair specifications. @silverarrowcarsltd addressed inquiries regarding the car’s battery, confirming its current life percentage and detailing previous ownership. Additionally, comments from @IMCARS and @RoyToy2003 presented insights about the car’s market negotiations, previous auction estimates, and concerns about future repair costs, serving as a reminder of the complexity involved in purchasing high-end vehicles. Users also speculated about the car’s market value and compared it with others in the same category, noting its demand and pricing fluctuations.
Negative: Not all feedback was positive; some comments raised concerns regarding the costs associated with maintaining the McLaren P1. @SpeedRacerGuy expressed bafflement at the high repair bills, indicating that even for wealthy buyers, the costs could be unappealing. @theforce88 and @JettJolene offered mixed sentiments about the car’s upkeep while praising its design, pointing out the high price of parts and service. Additionally, @navchak critiqued the carbon fiber weave alignment, feeling it was inadequate for a car of such prestige, while others echoed similar sentiments of caution regarding long-term ownership expenses.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @BDAS, emphasizes that the 2008 Nissan Xterra is in amazing condition, having been well-loved by its original owner. A full inspection revealed that the vehicle has been maintained excellently, with all fluids in great shape and brand new tires. @CPT_5LOW and @Fleepman complimented the Xterra’s good looks, indicating a strong visual appeal. Additionally, @19Willys46 noted the vehicle’s satisfactory brake performance, suggesting overall reliability.
Neutral: Questions from potential buyers were addressed by @BDAS, including inquiries about the AC refrigerant type, tire wear dates, and the vehicle’s overall structural condition. @UscPhd97_ learned that the Xterra uses R134a refrigerant and that all four tires are new, which adds to the peace of mind for potential buyers. Another concern raised by @CarzAndMotorcyclz about the underside showed that while there was light corrosion, the structural integrity of the vehicle remains sound, with proper inspections conducted. The seller also mentioned the presence of some undercoating.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about the vehicle’s history and potential issues, including @stirich’s inquiry about any accidents and @rockymtn’s question regarding the timing chain tensioner replacement, which is a common issue for this model. The seller, @BDAS, admitted that while the Carfax indicated a minor front incident, everything seemed original. Despite reassurances, some buyers may still feel hesitant due to these unanswered historical concerns, along with the worry raised by @19Willys46 who mentioned having had numerous brake issues with a similar model.
|
 |
Positive: @G.O.G.B. expressed enjoyment for the vehicle, noting its features with enthusiasm. @gt-6_mk3 mentioned the impressive specifications of the truck, detailing multiple unique features like lockers, an altimeter, a winch, and heated seats. @Mrdwp (The Seller) also reassured potential buyers that the truck is in new condition and comes with a factory warranty, emphasizing a commitment to customer satisfaction with no disappointments expected.
Neutral: @jpf1301 provided information regarding pricing, stating the dealers in Florida offer different models at specific prices, which adds clarity to potential buyers. @Crazy_Canadian highlighted the frequency of seeing these vehicles in Canada due to the lack of import tariffs there, emphasizing a different market dynamic. Additionally, @gehns inquired about the nature of the sale, whether it is a private party or dealer transaction, which could affect tax implications for the buyer.
Negative: @Shumdit humorously pointed out a potential issue with the steering wheel being mounted upside down, which could raise concerns about quality control. @HAPPY criticized the notion of using new cars as investment opportunities, claiming that the market has changed and that dealers do not typically ask for markups today. @Mrdwp (The Seller) responded defensively, attempting to clarify any misconceptions about the vehicle’s sale and emphasizing that it was not intended as a flip for profit.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as a beautiful original California black plate beauty with a lovely color combination, emphasizing its aesthetic appeal. @McFood also compliments the car, highlighting its stylish and classy color combination. @63impalaboy provides an overview of the Thunderbird’s construction quality, emphasizing the care that went into building these cars at the Wixom plant and noting that they are wonderful ways to enter the hobby without significant financial risk.
Neutral: @benbill (The Seller) addresses the functionality of the vehicle’s A/C system, clarifying that it works but not through the lower vents, as the vacuum lines may have been disrupted during engine work. @benbill (The Seller) also comments on the car’s overall paint condition, stating it remains very good due to being garaged and protected with a resin-based coating. Links to information about HVAC system repair for this model are shared by @Electraglider, indicating a resource for further understanding of the vacuum door operation.
Negative: @kink56 expresses disappointment about the A/C system, mentioning a lack of holistic attention from workers during repairs, suggesting they overlook impacts on other systems like the vacuum. @kink56 also takes issue with the seller’s statement regarding the car’s classification, clarifying that Glamour Birds specifically refer to models from 1967-1971, and arguing that the Thunderbird in question is indeed a Flair Bird. @jeffsf2002 questions a significant payment made for engine work, indicating concern about the costs associated with the car’s repairs.
|
 |
Positive: @TheDudeAbides2 highlighted that the car is a clean driver-grade Honda S2000, which suggests it is an enjoyable vehicle for potential buyers. @Worldclassmotorcars (The Seller) describes it as a very nice one-owner car with a great sound system, particularly enjoyable with the top down and emphasizes its perfect driving condition, reflecting confidence in the vehicle’s quality. Additionally, @TheDudeAbides2 appreciates the car’s color, expressing that Silverstone looks truly great on this model, indicating aesthetic satisfaction with its appearance.
Neutral: @Worldclassmotorcars (The Seller) explained that due to the original owner’s illness, the low mileage reflects limited use in the last years. The seller acknowledges the inquiries about the accident and control arm condition, and provides a background on their dealership experience, inviting further questions from potential buyers and clarifying their stance on the car’s history. @CaliCarEnthusiast raised the necessity for a driving video while also noting potential concerns regarding the car’s condition, like the oxidation on the underside and the service records, highlighting the importance of transparency in the listing.
Negative: There were concerns raised about the car’s accident history with @luigit and @imthefranchise asking for photos of the damage. @997TTS noted discrepancies like the control arm’s condition and the possible presence of a paint blend line on the driver’s door, which could indicate prior repair work. @Damaho912 expressed worry regarding the missing VIN stickers after an accident, suggesting they might deter discerning buyers, and overall, some commenters felt that the seller is not engaging effectively in discussions, as indicated by @997TTS’s remark on the lack of seller interaction.
|
 |
Positive: @1091_sam commented on the vehicle’s impressive performance at 167,000 miles, noting that it is still running well and remains intact. Additionally, @4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) indicated that he would be posting videos showcasing the vehicle’s features and functionality soon, which is likely to excite potential buyers.
Neutral: @4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) responded to inquiries from users like @jsjodin, explaining the missing trim bezel over the clock and sharing that videos of the vehicle would be available shortly. He mentioned a general delay due to a busy week but assured everyone that the videos, including a cold start and convertible top operation, were forthcoming.
Negative: @staleyholdings raised specific concerns about the vehicle’s condition, asking if there were videos of the engine and top operating as well as whether the AC blows cold and if there are any smells of smoking. The need for assurance on these points indicates some hesitation regarding the vehicle’s overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the beauty and originality of the 1955 Pontiac Star Chief Catalina. @Dollycat3 describes it as ‘absolutely gorgeous’ and notes the beautiful interior. @Undertaker also shares fond memories of the model, stating the car ‘should garner a lot of interest.’ @63impalaboy highlights its significance in automotive history, emphasizing the impressive features such as the new 287 cubic inch V8 engine and the appealing aesthetic of the mid-century design. The overall sentiment reflects a strong appreciation for the vehicle’s unique styling and historical value.
Neutral: Several commentators engage in a detailed discussion about the car’s specifications, particularly its transmission and carburetor. @Carzz and @Pfeil clarify that the transmission is indeed a four-speed HydraMatic rather than a three-speed, and they provide insights into the different carburetors available at the time. The interactions also involve the @seller updating the listing based on this feedback, showcasing a collaborative effort in sharing information about the vehicle’s features and specifications.
Negative: Conversely, some comments express concerns regarding specific aspects of the vehicle. @mike_rockwell critiques the combination of yellow whitewalls and faux wire wheel covers, suggesting that a different style of whitewalls or painted wheels would be more appropriate. He finds that these elements clash visually with the car’s overall appearance. Additionally, sentiments indicate some skepticism about the interior’s authenticity, with @Nathaniel1234 questioning whether it is indeed leather, to which the @seller later responds by clarifying the materials used.
|
 |
Positive: @Jetspeed (The Seller) shares heartfelt memories of his father, expressing pride in the meticulous care that went into maintaining the Honda motorcycle. @Beefmaster compliments the bike’s impressive condition and suggests it would make a great pair with another Honda model, showing enthusiasm for its aesthetic and historical value. @DodgeM37 and @Pete_in_PA also observe that the bike appears to be well-maintained and in great cosmetic condition, with little needed to return it to operation. @joeveto appreciates the handwritten notes of the seller’s father, indicating that such care speaks volumes about the bike’s value and the character of its previous owner.
Neutral: @Ishutche expresses condolences for the loss of @Jetspeed (The Seller)’s father, noting that his dad also had a passion for meticulous tools. They inquire about how long the motorcycle has been idle, reflecting genuine curiosity about its condition. @PhilO asks about the compression in the cylinders, indicating a technical interest in the bike. The remarks from @FX3_4 about possible repairs to turn indicators suggest that the bike may need some updates, emphasizing that these are manageable and could enhance the motorcycle’s functionality.
Negative: @Jetspeed (The Seller) admits to challenges in providing specific maintenance details due to lack of access to his father’s documents. He mentions the troubling aspect of the bike not starting despite its history of meticulous maintenance. @FX3_4 highlights potential issues with the condition of rubber components in the bike, and @Ishutche’s inquiry about how long the bike sat unused indicates concerns about its current state, underscoring the uncertainties that accompany a vintage motorcycle’s auction.
|
 |
Positive: The comments showcase overwhelming admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive build quality and aesthetic appeal. @DavidJames007 refers to it as the favorite build yet, with strong encouragement to bid with confidence. @Gt-Four90 and @masterwayne express their appreciation for the car’s design, calling it an absolute gem and praising its condition. Additionally, @BURN_UNIT, a former owner, shares a heartfelt connection to the car, emphasizing the outstanding restoration work done over the years and wishes for its new owner to enjoy it as much as he did.
Neutral: Several commenters make neutral inquiries or observations about the car’s performance and technical aspects. @Rlitcher asks about the specifics of the 6-speed transmission, while @sip raises concerns about the car being properly tuned prior to the sale. @Blackraft_ (The Seller) addresses these inquiries, clarifying that tuning can be done and explaining the choices made for the car’s setup without air conditioning or heat, focusing instead on aesthetics. Such discussions reflect the blend of interest in both the vehicle’s appearance and its mechanical state.
Negative: Some comments hint at potential issues or concerns regarding the vehicle. @mr2nate questions the mounting of the right side tires, and @sip suggests that a properly tuned car would fetch a better auction price. @cruisemissile raises queries about the car’s air filter assembly, implying a lack of attention to certain performance elements. These remarks indicate a cautious approach from some viewers who wish for more information about the car’s operational readiness and functional refinements.
|
 |
Positive: @Veneeshun (The Seller) describes the 1963 Fury as a solid and rust-free car, equipped with an impressive 505ci stroker engine boasting around 600bhp. Commenters like @Dollycat3 and @FAO echo these sentiments, appreciating the vehicle’s beauty and comfort. @boaboyoz highlights the car’s attractive build, while @Valiantjim applauds the engine configuration and overall design, emphasizing its potential as a comfortable road car with historical significance. Overall, many find the Fury to be a remarkable and desirable machine.
Neutral: Several comments focus on technical aspects of the car without strong emotional tones. @Spider_Mike notes that the California black plates are period correct, suggesting the car has a history in California. @Valiantjim raises questions about the rearend ratio and its implications on driving characteristics, mentioning possible configurations without negative connotations. @Veneeshun (The Seller) responds to inquiries about the rear end and other features, indicating a willingness to provide potential buyers with the information they need.
Negative: There are few negative comments, but @Valiantjim’s inquiries reflect concerns regarding the car’s performance setup and whether the rear axle configuration is suitable for its engine power. Though the comments are not overtly critical, they indicate a level of caution regarding the car’s specifications and how they may affect its performance. @Valiantjim also questions certain aesthetic aspects such as items hanging in front of the rear axle, showing a practical concern for condition.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a generally favorable view of the vehicle, with multiple commenters praising its appearance and overall quality. @Wintrop described it as a nice-looking vehicle that should perform well, while @JWebbTexas simply called it a beauty. @89lincolntc also expressed admiration, stating that the vehicle appears well-represented and sorted, suggesting confidence in bidding for it. Overall, there’s a sense of appreciation for the Tahoe’s aesthetics and condition, presenting a positive impression for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on specific aspects of the vehicle, indicating a mix of curiosity and hope for its functionality. @Thereddevil asked about the velcro strips on the dash and potential damage to the quarter panel frame, while @kjhall58 inquired about the air conditioning’s performance. @NeonChristopher raised a question regarding the locking rear differential and whether it had a switch, reflecting a common interest in the vehicle’s mechanical features. These inquiries imply a desire for transparency and reassurance among those considering the vehicle.
Negative: Some comments highlighted potential concerns and issues, indicating areas of caution for buyers. @OldestZack (The Seller) noted that the side mirrors are aftermarket and may not withstand the test of time, having needed polishing already. There were also mentions of previous repairs, such as the need for new u-joints and an ABS light that had recently come on, which could suggest ongoing maintenance challenges. Additionally, @maxtorq expressed curiosity about whether the engine smokes on cold starts, reflecting some doubt about the vehicle’s reliability over time. These negative undertones suggest that while the vehicle is appealing, it may not be without its drawbacks.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its rarity and the quality of its refurbishment. @FA7298 noted that this is a ‘very rare LHD S800 in this condition,’ emphasizing that the restoration work has been performed by leading experts in the field. @TheDudeAbides2 added to this sentiment, describing the car as ‘gorgeous’ and expressing excitement about its future value, while also calling it ‘the car to buy on BAT right now.’ The comments suggest a high appreciation for the car’s aesthetics and craftsmanship.
Neutral: There were a few inquiries about specific details regarding the car’s condition and specifications. @meacham asked if the original wheels were still available, while @DFWcarandtoymuseum questioned whether the vehicle used a driveshaft or was chain-driven. @Goose1964 requested additional pictures of parts of the car, specifically areas of imperfections noted in earlier images, which indicates a desire for thorough assessment. @Chenango, the seller, responded to these queries, indicating a willingness to provide more information and images to potential buyers.
Negative: While the overall reception of the vehicle has been positive, there were some concerns about its imperfections. @Goose1964 specifically pointed out these imperfections and requested detailed pictures of those areas, suggesting that not all aspects of the car are immaculate. @Chenango acknowledged these concerns and promised to address them by providing further images. However, there was no overt criticism of the car that would detract from its overall appeal among the commenters.
|
 |
Positive: @katz6200 (The Seller) expresses a heartfelt sentiment about the Cadillac Seville, describing it as a gold plated buckle that was a cherished possession of their mother. They emphasize the emotional value attached to the vehicle, hoping it finds a new home where it will be appreciated. @Palgeorge admires the stylish nature of the mother who owned the car, appreciating the gold badging and quirky vanity plate, implying the car’s unique character. @Craven also praises the owner’s taste, particularly noting the rare 84 Olympic TAJMHL plates and confirming the vehicle’s charm and value.
Neutral: @bry593 describes the Cadillac as an interesting find, highlighting its rarity and expressing hope that it will go to a new owner who will continue to preserve it. @GLWA is interested in inspecting the vehicle, indicating a practical step in the buying process without making a judgment on its condition. @murdog10 inquires about the air conditioning functionality, suggesting a specific aspect of the vehicle that potential buyers might be curious about.
Negative: @76GPrix raises a note of caution, expressing skepticism about the deal and advising others to be vigilant. This comment introduces a sense of doubt regarding the sale’s legitimacy, contrasting with the positive and neutral feedback provided by other commenters. The concerns expressed by @76GPrix highlight the importance of thoroughness and caution when making such purchases.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters shared a positive view of the vehicle, appreciating its feel-good nature. @smb127 mentioned how driving it brings a sense of joy, referring to it as an underrated car. @Hercule_LaJoy found it amusing that the car was converted from RHD to LHD in the UK, noting that such a conversion could enhance the car’s value and make it easier to sell. Additionally, @VroomForTwo complimented its aesthetic appeal, referring to the design elements as ‘tastefully done.’ @CathyYukich, the seller, acknowledged these sentiments while also providing prospective buyers with insights about the car’s features and history, furthering the car’s appeal.
Neutral: Several comments focused on logistical and technical aspects of the vehicle rather than expressing strong impressions. @Automotoratom asked about registering the car in states that require titles, while @raymead had numerous inquiries regarding various features, such as the radio, power steering fluid concerns, and potential dashboard damage. @CathyYukich responded to these inquiries with clarifying details about the oil leak and spoke to the state registration requirements, indicating that she possesses the necessary documentation to facilitate the process. Overall, the comments in this section reflect a mix of curiosity and engagement regarding the practicalities of the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns regarding the condition of the car were highlighted in several comments. @ignoramoose pointedly asked about an oil leak, prompting @CathyYukich to disclose that it does not burn oil but leaves a minor wet spot on the garage floor. @raymead expressed apprehension about several repairs, including potential leaks and dashboard cracks, hinting at deeper issues. Furthermore, @icemanhd speculated that the cracks might indicate a subpar repair job from past modifications. Various commenters also mentioned the challenges of registering the vehicle in California due to stringent requirements, with @ganzo and @thomas50shades detailing costly and lengthy processes to meet state emission laws. This accumulation of uncertainty did cast a shadow over the vehicle’s overall desirability.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments praised the vehicle’s aesthetics and rarity. @dollycat3 described it as a beautiful and rare Jimmy, while @90IROC reminisced about its clean condition and mentioned reliability. The seller, @Aubrey, responded positively to these claims, emphasizing that the vehicle features real wood and that only a few of these units were made, making it a rare find. @90IROC expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, indicating that it resonates with him on a personal level due to his past experience with similar models.
Neutral: Discussion about the technical details of the vehicle included inquiry into the mileage verification. Commenter @fsacb3 highlighted that the CARFAX report doesn’t indicate mileage until 2016 and sought clarification on whether the mileage is accurate. @Aubrey reassured the commenter that the original interior suggests low mileage, while @gregryba provided insights on the modifications. The discussion also touched upon the characteristics of the ‘Woody’ package, with @gregryba offering additional context regarding its production numbers.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle’s condition and history. @fsacb3 questioned how to verify the mileage and noted that it wasn’t always clear from the listing. Concerns about the wood trim also arose, with @fsacb3 inquiring about repair options should it become damaged. Although @Aubrey provided assurance about the trim’s current condition, the queries indicate a level of skepticism about potential maintenance issues and the overall transparency of the vehicle’s history.
|
 |
Positive: @Ontwowheelsaz expresses admiration for the vehicle’s stunning condition and hopes the seller receives proper recognition for offering it no reserve. @surferMark praises the bike’s sophisticated upgrades such as the improved starter and disc brakes, highlighting that it is one of the most refined models ever made. Additionally, @2hecknback describes the bike as eager for long rides at high speeds, emphasizing its performance capabilities and readiness for serious highway use.
Neutral: @BeemerNut raises several technical questions regarding included components and the condition of specific bike parts, emphasizing the importance of proper maintenance for optimal handling. @adbuch notes that while the bike may lack originality due to certain modifications, it remains a beautiful specimen with a rich history. @Drakman inquires about the fuel tank material, indicating a focus on the bike’s overall condition and integrity.
Negative: On a critical note, @rofandofy points out the absence of the Interstate exhaust, which is deemed essential for the bike’s authenticity. @adbuch further argues that aftermarket modifications can diminish the bike’s original value, suggesting that restoration to original specs may be necessary for future resale. @2hecknback chimes in emphasizing that the modifications may impact the bike’s collectability, indicating a split between riders who prioritize functionality over originality.
|
 |
Positive: @TNGuy expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, praising its strong and durable engine while mentioning its potential for year-round enjoyment. @CarsGlobal, the seller, provided various details including the interior height measurements, which exemplifies prompt and informative customer service. The van’s suitability as a DIY RV candidate was also highlighted positively, indicating its versatility and appeal for potential buyers looking for customization.
Neutral: There were several inquiries about the vehicle’s condition, particularly concerning the undercarriage. @CarsGlobal assured @Nidog and @hurricane39 that the undercarriage had been pressure washed, with no rust holes found, and uploaded pictures to clarify the situation. Additionally, there were questions regarding the dimensions of the van’s interior from @JBMADDOX61 and @Jbar25, as well as a query about tire pressure from @n8sfavtoy, which was addressed by the seller confirming the issue was resolved.
Negative: Some comments brought up concerns about the vehicle’s condition, with @Nidog asking about the undercarriage and @hurricane39 pointing out possible issues, indicating there may be doubts among potential buyers about its maintenance. @robdeo and @GTO400fourspeed made light-hearted comments about the van’s usage, with the latter suggesting it was previously used by the County morgue. Additionally, @Vandabs pointed out a discrepancy regarding the wheels, stating they were described as alloy but were actually steel, which could create confusion for prospective purchasers.
|
 |
Positive: The 2004 Chrysler Crossfire Limited Coupe is lauded for its reliability and performance, highlighted by its powerful V6 engine and the rare 6-speed manual transmission. The seller, @WCD2020, emphasizes that the car has been well maintained, with no leaks and a clean exterior and interior that resemble a well-cared-for luxury vehicle. The Crossfire’s design is also appreciated, showcasing a unique blend of modern styling and classic influences, which adds to its appeal as a potential future collectible. The seller believes that this model represents excellent value in the current auction market.
Neutral: Comments reflect a mix of curiosity and requests for more information about the vehicle’s condition. @Wheelhouse69 inquires about any leaks or maintenance history, while @Hollywoodcarguy requests a cold start and driving video to better assess the car’s performance before making a bid. The seller addresses these inquiries by affirming the car’s clean condition and reliability, citing that it runs well and has been carefully maintained throughout its life.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the limitations of the Crossfire, especially when compared to its counterparts like the SLK Mercedes. There is some skepticism about how closely related the two models are, as the Crossfire, despite its Mercedes heritage, is seen by some as a less prestigious vehicle. The seller attempts to defend the Crossfire’s merit as a unique model with its own identity, overcoming doubts about its reputation and potential resale value, especially since it’s from an era of Chrysler’s collaboration with a luxurious brand.
|
 |
Positive: @torelloamerican (The Seller) welcomes everyone to view their very low-mile C4 Vette and encourages potential buyers to ask questions if they have any. @Boydsg416 compliments the vehicle’s color and expresses interest in it, noting that he is currently watching the listing. Overall, the car is appreciated for its aesthetic appeal, particularly the combination of white with black interior, which seems to resonate well with observers.
Neutral: @Boydsg416 points out a concern regarding cracks on the center console, prompting @slammin to provide insight about the materials used in this model’s construction. They explain that the ‘Dulso’ material can wear out over time, becoming sticky, but it can also be refinished. @torelloamerican acknowledges the hairline crack in the bezel and clarifies that while the material isn’t as sticky as seen on other high-mileage cars, it can be replaced at a reasonable cost if necessary.
Negative: @whp38 raises a question about the orientation of the wheels, suggesting that they may be on the wrong side based on his experience with C5s and C1s. This indicates some uncertainty regarding the car’s details. However, @rgilson7 reassures him that the rims are indeed in the correct orientation, which suggests that there may have been some confusion regarding the car’s specifications.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg commented that the vehicle is a “Good looking GT 63 S” suggesting an overall aesthetic appreciation. @jorodriguez90 expressed enthusiasm for the car as a potential replacement for their SL63, which hints at the GT 63 S being appealing to buyers looking for a family-friendly option without sacrificing style. The comments reflect an admiration for the vehicle’s design and a desire from potential buyers, indicating a positive reception.
Neutral: @MWB32 (The Seller) provided detailed information about the car, confirming the presence of Paint Protection Film (PPF) only on the front and stating the current condition of the vehicle regarding minor damages and service history. Several commenters, such as @jbwz65 and @winterarc, asked technical questions regarding the car’s maintenance and features, showing interest in specifics but not expressing strong positive or negative sentiments. Overall, the inquiries indicate that potential buyers are weighing their options based on practical details.
Negative: @Wayz2B highlighted visible imperfections by commenting that the damage is “much more than a little scratch,” reflecting concerns over the vehicle’s condition. Additionally, @BSD123 noted the inconvenience of the front license plate being drilled into the bumper, which @MWB32 (The Seller) acknowledged was a previous owner’s choice that he personally disapproves of. These comments suggest that there are notable flaws and concerns that may deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @mcqueens, the seller, highlights that the rims are included in the auction, which is a point of interest for potential buyers. @CarDogThreePedals comments on the clean appearance of the vehicle and notes the rarity of the non-A/C version, suggesting that this ’83 Trans Am is a desirable model. @xfire305 appreciates the listing and mentions that while bowling ball caps are rare, they do appear occasionally on eBay, reflecting a positive sentiment towards the availability of parts. The comments also showcase nostalgia, with various users expressing fond memories of their own experiences with similar vehicles, indicating a strong connection to the model.
Neutral: @texxas mentions that aftermarket dash covers for the Gen3 Trans Am fit better than those for Gen2 due to a simpler design. Additionally, @1035kmiller1 offers a technical perspective on the car’s horsepower evolution from 145hp in 1982 to 150hp in 1983. @Seadoorider discusses the potential for its L69 designation and shares insights about specifications and performance options available for the year, indicating a knowledgeable community around the vehicle’s features.
Negative: Negative feedback is sparse, but @JayKay2430 expresses mild disappointment that the bowling ball wheel covers are no longer present. @mark01 notes that these wheel covers are often lost due to heat damage or mishandling, which may detract from the vehicle’s originality. Moreover, @dsm60175 shares a personal anecdote about his experience with securing bowling ball covers, indicating that while the parts are popular, they can be problematic over time.
|
 |
Positive: @zdoctor expresses a strong fondness for the car, indicating their excitement about its potential despite wishing it had a manual transmission. @racelance also shares admiration for the vehicle, noting its cleaner design compared to newer models and wishing the seller good luck with it, showing confidence in its quality. @Holyfield73 appreciates their own similar model, claiming it’s a future classic and expresses love for it, implying a positive outlook on the M series as a whole.
Neutral: @piezopaul raises a practical question about the necessary servicing for a car that has been inactive for a long period, reflecting a responsible approach to vehicle maintenance. @2manyKarz provides insight based on personal experience, suggesting additional care typically needed for cars after a long period of inactivity and emphasizing the enjoyment found in a well-maintained model.
Negative: @haugen1992 shares mixed feelings about the rims, initially commenting on their unfavorable match with the car’s silver paint, before later acknowledging that they look good, indicating a change of opinion. @sord and @Holyfield73 both make comments about the mileage, implying that the car’s current state may not align with what they consider a proper usage, hinting at an expectation for more engagement with the vehicle than its minimal mileage indicates.
|
 |
Positive: @mlesko73 commented on the vehicle’s build quality, highlighting the choice of Emberglo as an excellent touch since it’s the only year it was offered. @mlesko73 appreciates that everything on the vehicle works well, including the wheels and the tasteful design of the hood scoop, which can often be poorly executed on other cars.
Neutral: @AquaVoyager inquired about the possibility of uploading a video of the vehicle in motion, indicating interest in seeing how the car performs while being driven.
Negative: @GLWTA,JCCP mentioned that the vehicle had new brakes installed in ’07 and noted that the current owner purchased it in ’21. However, they expressed concern over the weak e-brake, questioning why it hasn’t been adjusted, especially since the vehicle has a manual transmission.
|
 |
Positive: @lovetodriveoldcars (The Seller) describes the car as fabulous and presents an honest assessment, complemented by engaging photos. Many commenters echo this sentiment, with @eurosports calling it a beautiful car, while @Dollycat3 admires its stunning and elegant color combination. Additionally, @robisonservice appreciates the originality of the vehicle, noting that it looks better than many other Silver Clouds on the market. @Bordeaux shares fond memories of driving a similar model, emphasizing its excellence. The overall consensus reflects admiration for the car’s aesthetics and classic appeal.
Neutral: Several comments request more information or clarification, indicating a balanced curiosity. @Jim1348 asks for a full side profile photo, which @lovetodriveoldcars promptly provides. The discussion about the air conditioning system also reveals people want more detail, with @srd6 and others pondering its functionality and potential costs for retrofitting. Even @Chris_L1 gets involved by suggesting that the knobs in the pictures may control the air conditioning, demonstrating that while there are inquiries, they stem from genuine interest in ensuring the car’s features are well understood.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the car’s functionality, particularly about the speedometer, which @pmusgerg notes seems faulty in a video. @CarGuyDC and @carreram warn that these vintage models, including the Silver Cloud III, are prone to rust and can be expensive to maintain, which could deter potential buyers. Furthermore, queries about the air conditioning create uncertainty, with several commenters, including @leefchambers and @srd6, highlighting the importance of the AC’s operational status given the condition described by @lovetodriveoldcars. Overall, while the car garners mostly positive responses, underlying apprehensions about maintenance and functionality are evident.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight that the 1997 Gold Wing is the last of the naked models, with @BigEB noting its historical significance. @sfmonster23 (The Seller) passionately talks about his fondness for the bike, indicating that it’s a good choice for enthusiasts looking for a well-maintained motorcycle. @rwantin reminisces about the smooth ride and comfort experienced with a similar model, emphasizing its capabilities for touring after minor modifications. This sentiment is echoed by the Seller, who expresses hope that the bike lands in the hands of someone who will appreciate and care for it.
Neutral: There are inquiries about the bike’s maintenance history, with @SDCR asking for documentation on the carb and brake rebuilds, demonstrating the potential buyers’ interests in its service record. @karlcpo requests confirmation of engine RPM at cruising speed and suggests preventative maintenance on the timing belts, indicating shared concern for the bike’s condition. @SDCR further questions whether essential components like the timing belt and water pump have been changed, highlighting the importance of maintenance but without escalating alarm.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters express concerns about the bike’s potential upkeep needs. @SDCR questions the timing belt and water pump status, hinting at risks for future riders if maintenance hasn’t been performed. @karlcpo’s inquiry into whether the engine is interference adds another layer of caution, as it implies that neglecting repairs could lead to significant issues. @sfmonster23 acknowledges these points, indicating he has not replaced the timing components, which may deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @GMT400Man praises the vehicle for its nice condition and suitability for work, highlighting its appealing color scheme and period-correct wheels. @DStone4320, the seller, describes the truck’s excellent maintenance, detailing its history as a one-owner vehicle that performed light ranch duties. The truck features a professional ceramic coat and has had new shocks added, which has contributed to its impressive condition.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @bromies and @Cm86c4, request additional photos to assess specific areas of the truck more thoroughly, such as the front end suspension and the rear tailgate. @DStone4320 responds promptly to requests for more images and videos, emphasizing the vehicle’s overall good shape and his willingness to assist potential buyers with shipping arrangements.
Negative: @Whitey69 expresses frustration with the functioning of the videos linked to the truck listing, implying a potential issue with viewing the content. @KawaZmoto also reiterates a request for more information about the rear tailgate, suggesting some dissatisfaction with the available images. Overall, while there are minor concerns regarding the presentation, they don’t overshadow the general praise for the truck.
|
 |
Positive: @johnnyvett considers the vehicle a “Great Candidate for a side pipe car” and suggests installing factory-style ’69 side pipes on it, indicating a personal preference for that feature. @Tobyallen appreciates the design of the rear valance exhaust cutouts on the C2 and C3 Corvettes and specifically mentions his fondness for the styling of the ’68 and ’69 models. He implies that the car could still benefit from some exhaust improvements, showing a positive inclination towards enhancements.
Neutral: @mslc (The Seller) notes that while the car may have previously had side pipes, they are unsure if it originally came equipped with them. Additionally, over the 11 years of ownership, @mslc has made numerous repairs and upgrades, ranging from a transmission rebuild to replacing various components like the battery and power steering lines. This information indicates a focus on maintenance rather than original matching numbers, suggesting a solid but non-collector-grade vehicle.
Negative: @Banksonit709 raises a concern about the condition of the carpet in the driver’s well, describing it as “WET?” This comment indicates potential issues with the car’s interior or maintenance related to leaks. @mslc also shares a past problem where an oil pressure gauge leaked after the interior was redone, which was later fixed, but the initial incident may detract from the overall appeal of the vehicle, highlighting potential care or quality issues.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle and its presentation. @Phlorida described the promotional video as the best ever, while @KP777 agreed, noting it was a great presentation emphasizing the excellent value of the Mercedes SL65 AMG compared to its original price. @EJWinters3 described the car as a ‘beautiful beast’ and commended the presentation further. @Gratefulmas expressed admiration for the car, indicating they own a similar model and intend to watch the bidding. @MackBat also expressed appreciation for the car’s maintenance, stating a desire to make an offer if circumstances allowed. Overall, the vehicle garnered enthusiasm and admiration from the community.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions or sought clarification regarding the vehicle’s service history and repairs. @Johnkfl inquired about additional service records due to a perceived gap in the maintenance history. @Moovit questioned the reason for repainting the rear bumper and replacing the headlight assembly, highlighting concerns about transparency in the vehicle’s past. @Nacoocheejohn and @esa2207 requested paint meter readings to assess the integrity of the paintwork, while @Jo1- commented on the cleanliness of the car’s underside. These queries indicate a desire for transparency and assurance regarding the vehicle’s condition.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, there were concerns regarding the vehicle’s history. @Johnkfl noted a lack of service records from previous owners, raising valid questions about the care it received between ownerships. @Moovit also brought attention to the repainting of the rear bumper, suggesting there may have been issues in the past that were not sufficiently disclosed. Furthermore, @Smkymts mentioned a correction regarding the vehicle’s carbon fiber trunk option, indicating potential inaccuracies in the promotional materials. Overall, while the car impressed many, some commenters urged caution and sought more detailed information.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters appreciate the car’s overall aesthetic, citing its pretty interior and original features. @Keperkins highlights the car’s straight body and gorgeous Connolly interior while pointing out that it’s attractively priced at under $9,000, which is a rarity for such models. Others agree that the car is easy to fix despite needing minor repairs, suggesting it has potential to be a well-loved classic with some attention.
Neutral: The technical discussions about the vehicle’s condition are prevalent, with commenters discussing necessary maintenance, such as the need for a tune-up and issues regarding the fuel gauge and accumulator. @JBAdams provides detailed insights into mechanical components that need attention, including the engine-driven hydraulic pumps and potential electrical issues. Commenters like @RPA1948 clarify the status of the car’s air conditioning, indicating it hasn’t been converted to modern standards, while other user responses offer a mix of technical advice and suggestions for upgrades.
Negative: On the downside, some remarks reflect concerns over the condition and necessary repairs of the vehicle. @Montaigne estimates that substantial renovations could cost up to $50,000, alluding to needed paint, upholstery, and mechanical reviews. The need for a complete repaint due to tacky modifications was criticized by @DaveD, with @guntherbil adding that such modifications are a crime against the vehicle’s integrity. Furthermore, other users express concern about the hydraulic system and the overall investment required to restore the vehicle to its prime, suggesting that the renovation could be a burdensome project.
|
 |
Positive: @mfedorov (The Seller) highlights that the 1998 BMW Z3 runs and feels like new after a series of replacements and maintenance, boasting improvements such as new brakes, rotors, tires, and a proper alignment. The vehicle is equipped with Dinan intake and software enhancements that reportedly increase power output, with the seller describing the driving experience as responsive and exhilarating. Commenters like @SMIK90 also affirm the car’s quality, noting that it delivers fantastic performance and sound, making it a pleasurable vehicle to drive. Comments from @2002dave express enthusiasm for the Z3s as fun, affordable, and easy to maintain sports cars, comparing them favorably to more expensive alternatives.
Neutral: While there are some queries regarding the vehicle’s cooling system and suspension updates, @mfedorov clarifies that these components have not been refreshed under his ownership, but assures that the car runs perfectly in hot weather. @DD27 and others discuss concerns about welds in the trunk and the airbag light, with expectations that these issues are fairly manageable. @Damaho912 provides context on potential issues with welds but also points out that these concerns can sometimes be overstated across different versions of the Z3, particularly when it comes to the six-cylinder models.
Negative: Some comments indicate skepticism over the quick sale of the vehicle, with @Rocky_Dan questioning the seller’s intentions. There is also mention of conflicting information regarding the performance specifications attributed to the Dinan modifications, which @Damaho912 points out. Although @mfedorov attempts to clarify discrepancies about performance gains and the airbag light issue, the presence of such questions subtly highlights concerns some potential buyers might harbor regarding the vehicle’s history and current condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally praise the vehicle’s specifications and aesthetics, with @FDF1 calling it a “beautiful spec” and highlighting its impressive presentation. @List-Renn appreciates the additional horsepower compared to an older model, noting that it sets this vehicle apart from others. @AndyF007 expresses a strong fondness for the Macan GTS, describing it as a fun and enjoyable car, while @motorcar_collector simply admires the color choice, indicating a favorable impression overall.
Neutral: Several commenters have inquiries about the vehicle’s condition and features. @AK911 asks important questions regarding the presence of paint protection film, tire tread depth, and service history. @Rally356 and @AndyF007 bring up queries about the availability of both keys and the window sticker. The seller, @PrivateCollectionMotors, responds with details about the lack of PPF, the state of the tires, and key availability, maintaining open communication with potential buyers.
Negative: A few commenters express reservations or critiques about the vehicle. @Tghooper humorously critiques the use of “racing green” to describe the SUV, while @GrabberBlue believes that the color should be more exclusive to another brand. Some concern is voiced by @BMWE90Guy about missing features, specifically mentioning a wood steering wheel that could enhance the vehicle’s appeal. There’s also a sentiment from several commenters about the challenges of recovering some of the money spent on options, indicating skepticism about the resale value of the vehicle.
|
141-Mile 2023 Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack Widebody Shakedown Special Edition 6-Speed
2C3CDZFJ6PH605477
Lot 204315
Dealer
 |
Positive: @Premierautofl (The Seller) expresses excitement about offering the 2023 Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack Widebody Shakedown Special Edition, highlighting their readiness to assist with inquiries and transportation for out-of-state buyers. @Cruiserbret praises the vehicle as one of the coolest Last Call Challengers and notes its attractiveness and fun driving experience, labeling it a future collector car. Overall, the comments reflect a general enthusiasm for the car’s aesthetics and driving capabilities.
Neutral: @Ghoti1776 admires the beauty of the Challenger and wishes good luck to the seller, while also inquiring about the auction’s reserve status, showing a thoughtful engagement with the buying process. @Ghoti1776 later finds their own answer regarding the reserve by checking the FAQs, indicating a proactive approach in learning more about the auction format. Additionally, @VolvoguyKC humorously points out the lengthy name of the car, adding a light-hearted observation to the discussion.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle. @mnext02 expresses sympathy for a loss, though it does not directly relate to the vehicle itself. The comments overall maintain a positive to neutral tone, with no significant criticisms or complaints about the Dodge Challenger.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its desirability and the quality of the seller. @VetteFish shared that they trust the seller based on their positive experience in importing an RS4, indicating the seller’s commitment to providing clean and well-prepared vehicles. @Erod echoed this sentiment, describing the RS4 as ‘awesome’ and encouraging bids, while @HeavyTank77 praised the opening photograph, signifying an engaging presentation of the car. The general excitement was apparent when @702e30girl called the auction photos ‘works of art’, emphasizing their aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Several comments included inquiries and interesting observations about the vehicle rather than explicit praise or criticism. For instance, @RussMcD3 inquired whether the factory wheels would fit over the RS6 front brakes, demonstrating a technical curiosity about the car’s specifications. @kleinschuster raised questions about the vehicle’s modifications and parts used, indicating an interest in understanding its performance capabilities. @Cchiero97 remarked on the seller’s reputation, emphasizing their experience but not directly commenting on the vehicle itself. Overall, these comments represented a mix of technical questions and curiosity regarding the car.
Negative: There were a few light-hearted, humorous remarks that could be seen as playful critiques rather than negative comments. @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 jokingly inquired if the plane was included with the car, reflecting a whimsical take on the auction’s presentation. Additionally, @Cvr_123 and @TurtleMan09 made comments that suggested curiosity about other collectibles or performance figures, but did not reflect dissatisfaction with the vehicle itself. Overall, the comments lacked outright negativity and primarily leaned towards playful banter or side discussions about other interests.
|
11k-Mile Supercharged 2005 Dodge Ram SRT-10 Commemorative Edition 6-Speed
3D7HA16H35G858817
Lot 204317
Dealer
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle’s aesthetics and setup. @AERONCAPILOT described it as a ‘beautiful rig’ and @svtr1gger declared, ‘This is the one I’m buying.’ @69Daytona mentioned their previous ownership of a stock model and the thrill of this particular build, praising its color combination and the sound of the supercharger. @2quik6 also commented on the truck’s beauty, sharing their excitement about having a supercharged vehicle of their own and imagining how well it would fit alongside their Viper car. Overall, the design and performance aspects generated positive impressions among the audience.
Neutral: Several comments provided technical insights and inquiries about the vehicle, pointing out specific components and features. @BrucePhilly asked about the presence of a dyno sheet and noted the unique suspension kit, while @Che explained the function of an OEM damper. @BadAzp made observations regarding the vehicle’s shifter stick, traction bars, and potential tuning issues, contributing to the conversation about its performance enhancements. There was a general interest in clarifying these technical details, showcasing a balanced view of the vehicle’s modifications and features without any clear judgment.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns, particularly about noise and lack of information. @jhardy81 noted that the supercharger seemed to create a lot of noise in the cabin, which could be a potential downside for some buyers. Additionally, @rschrum expressed frustration regarding the difficulty in contacting the seller for more information, suggesting a lack of transparency about the vehicle’s modifications or history. @BadAzp also pointed out uncertainties about the tuning status and necessary paperwork, indicating that buyers might have concerns about reliability and performance without further clarification.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their appreciation for the bike, highlighting its attractive color combination and clean appearance. @Stwilli326 noted that it looks nice, while @joeveto complimented the classic Harley’s color scheme, suggesting that it catches the eye. Additionally, @TFOG mentioned that they enjoyed the bike when they had it, despite a mishap that led to its destruction, indicating a favorable overall impression of the motorcycle’s performance prior to the accident.
Neutral: The discussion also included inquiries about specific features of the bike, demonstrating potential buyers’ interest in technical details. @lubedude1 asked about the integrity of the handlebars, the replacement of the clutch lever, and the bike’s original condition. Responses from @jcbig44 (The Seller) provided clarifications, mentioning the condition of the handlebars at highway speeds and confirming the type of exhaust. Multiple comments addressed shipping concerns and costs, with @Apathyfern and @209klassiccycles discussing shipping rates and potential alternatives.
Negative: There were some concerns expressed about the bike’s condition and shipping costs. While @gord6 asked if the bike had ever been dropped, @jcbig44 (The Seller) reassured them that it had not been dropped by the last two owners, although uncertainty remained about the first owner. Additionally, @Apathyfern highlighted the high shipping costs to the Bay Area, which could limit the buying pool, thereby reflecting some negativity regarding the overall feasibility of purchasing the bike.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle’s aesthetics and history. @McFood admires the car’s blue color and imagines it in California, while @RwdJay fondly recalls restoring the car with his father and enjoying it throughout high school. @GLWTA shares a nostalgic memory of his daughter’s experience driving a similar model to school and expresses a wish that he had kept both cars. @JGraham praises the exhaust note and the car’s condition, noting it looks nice enough to drive without worry.
Neutral: The seller, @Classics4Murph, shares insights about the car’s history, including its restoration process and mechanical updates. They mention the presence of some inoperative items, such as the horn and AC system, and the condition of the bodywork, clarifying that all prior repair work was done by previous owners. They also appreciate the feedback from the community, indicating they are open to questions and discussions about the vehicle as the auction progresses. The seller discusses the reasons for selling, citing personal circumstances and the desire to focus on health and family.
Negative: Some comments express concern about the car’s mechanical issues and the quality of past repairs. @Winston52 inquires about intermittent horn and headlight problems and whether the repairs involved metal work or Bondo, while others like @Streeter suggest investigating the repairs more closely with a magnet. @02Les argues that the bumpers are aftermarket rather than euro-spec as stated, indicating potential discrepancies in the car’s description. This back-and-forth highlights a degree of caution among potential buyers regarding the authenticity and reliability of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @dontneedanothertruck describes the vehicle as very nice, agreeing with other commenters about its overall quality. @JBplays shares a personal connection, noting love for the truck based on their own similar experience with a 2019 model, and highlights its impressive cleanliness. @TargaDR and @2RiversNC echo the sentiment that the truck appears to be in excellent condition and better than newer models, showing admiration for its overall appearance and care.
Neutral: Several commenters seek more information about the truck’s history, including low mileage and recent maintenance. @genevamotorcars (The Seller) responds positively, providing details about the truck’s ownership history, suggesting it was a retirement gift and kept in pristine condition. @TargaDR inquires about fluid changes that have been made, and the Seller confirms that all necessary maintenance has been performed, hence addressing concerns about upkeep.
Negative: Some users express concerns despite the vehicle’s strong attributes. @TargaDR points out that the truck has 10-year-old tires and a battery, raising questions about their condition. @lawdog185 recounts personal experiences with minor reliability issues in previous models, hinting that while the Tundra is generally reliable, it is not without its quirks. Additional commentary from @gunnison reflects surprise at the rarity of Platinum models like this one, suggesting they might not be available often, which may be a potential issue for buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, emphasizing its stunning condition and rarity. @Airliner1 described the offering as ‘amazing’ and expressed a wish for more garage space to accommodate such a car. @RumbleAuto praised it as ‘an absolutely lovely example,’ while @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) highlighted its pristine state, mentioning the meticulous upkeep by a prior owner who ensured that it remained in museum-quality condition. The overall sentiment from various commentators suggests a deep appreciation for the vehicle’s beauty and preserved quality, with some even stating it represents the best of Porsche’s analog era.
Neutral: Several commenters provided insights or inquiries that reflect a mix of curiosity and concern regarding the vehicle’s usage and history. @Van_Slyke asked if service records were available, while @Scottd inquired about specific carbon package options. @SwissMovement cautioned about the importance of preserving the car’s value, suggesting that extensive driving might diminish its worth. Some users, like @OllieinAZ, compared their experiences with similar models, noting the joy derived from driving their cars, which adds a layer of reflection on the appropriate use of such a vehicle.
Negative: Some comments convey a sense of disappointment regarding the vehicle’s low mileage and its status as a ‘garage queen.’ @Truegrn questioned how a 17-year-old car could have so few miles, expressing confusion about its history. @qikqbn77 echoed this sentiment by lamenting that the previous owners allowed the vehicle to sit unused, stating that they could never imagine letting their own vehicle remain idle. Additionally, @Bartruff1 classified it as an ‘investor-grade car,’ implying that driving it might lead to a reduction in value, which did not sit well with those eager for the car to be enjoyed on the road.
|
 |
Positive: @Flooder complimented the truck’s interesting and unique modifications, expressing appreciation for its condition and functionality. @RedBeardBkln praised the seller’s restoration effort, calling the truck an exceptional find and even referring to it as a ‘golden chalice’ or ‘holy grail’ of Toyota Tacomas, emphasizing how it looks better than when it originally came off the lot. The seller, @Rscarsbikesandfun, also confirmed that all gauges and features are fully operational, and expressed his love for the truck, noting the extensive work done and that he ideally intended to keep it forever, which resonates with the admiration shown by other potential buyers.
Neutral: @NMLEO inquired about the truck’s extensive rehabilitation process and expressed curiosity about its functionality and any potential issues that might exist. The seller responded positively to all inquiries, assuring that nothing leaks and all features work correctly. He also explained his reason for selling, which was mainly due to the truck not being driven much since its restoration in 2017, indicating that he would prefer someone else to enjoy it rather than it just sitting in his garage.
Negative: Some potential buyers, such as @Flooder and @Alban2, raised concerns and sought additional details about the truck’s systems, including the sunroof cover and air conditioning conversion, demanding clarity on minor functional aspects that could affect future ownership. Additionally, @zak noted wanting to see a driving video to reinforce the truck’s appeal, while @84Cressida pointed out a misidentification concern regarding the vehicle model, potentially signaling confusion about the truck’s specifics. There was a general sense among some commenters that despite its appeal, thorough scrutiny of functional components was necessary before any purchase.
|
38k-Mile 2012 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS Convertible Indianapolis 500 Festival Edition
2G1FK3DJ1C9186837
Lot 204324
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle, emphasizing its limited-edition status as one of the 50 festival cars from the Indianapolis 500 in 2012. @57ChevyJohn (The Seller) highlighted its great running condition and mentioned that he has kept all original parts, including the factory air intake, which @AlPalmer10 inquired about. @JimmoVette remarked on the seller’s integrity and the well-maintained condition of the Camaro, offering reassurance to potential buyers that the car is exactly as represented and has been cared for under @57ChevyJohn’s ownership. Overall, the car has garnered attention as a valuable collector’s item, with many appreciating its special history and original features.
Neutral: Several comments provided factual information about the vehicle, including its specifications and options. @MS3DALE shared the model and detailed features such as the engine type, transmission, and various equipment packages, which helped clarify what prospective buyers could expect. @joey88tc asked about the rear view camera feature, to which @57ChevyJohn confirmed it exists and displays in the rearview mirror, further adding to the vehicle’s modern amenities. Additionally, the seller responded to inquiries about the car’s history and maintenance, indicating a transparent approach to the auction process.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle’s features and its previous auction history. @MS3DALE noted the absence of the RS package, which typically includes HID and halo headlights. This comment suggested that potential buyers might be disappointed by missing modern lighting features. Furthermore, @57ChevyJohn mentioned that the car initially failed a smog test, which could alarm potential buyers about its performance and reliability. However, after addressing minor issues by retorquing intake bolts, he successfully passed the smog check, but the initial failure may have left a lingering apprehension about ongoing maintenance needs.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed an appreciation for the vehicle’s performance and sound, particularly highlighting the V6 engine. @threeducs3 mentioned that the engine sounds fantastic and that the car stands out among others, specifically mentioning its great exhaust notes. @GeorgeBear (The Seller) also emphasized the exceptional condition of the vehicle, mentioning it has no dents, scratches, or flaws, and described how it roars when started and has a gentle growl while driving. Overall, there is a strong sentiment that this car is a fantastic option, especially for enthusiasts.
Neutral: There are also practical discussions regarding the vehicle’s mechanisms and operations. @sr5959 inquired about potential issues with the side flaps when the top is down, and @Thehand noted that a video documenting the top operation cut off unexpectedly, raising questions about its functionality. @GeorgeBear (The Seller) provided reassurance by sharing multiple photos and videos to illustrate the mechanism’s condition, stating there were no issues and letting potential buyers see the closing and opening process of the top.
Negative: On the downside, some comments reflected concerns about shipping costs and low bidding levels. @JETsports pointed out the nearly 4k cost to ship the vehicle across the country, while @threeducs3 noted that current bids are surprisingly low for what is regarded as a great car. Additionally, @Thehand’s concern about the top mechanism’s repair costs indicated uncertainty about potential future expenses, suggesting that while the car is impressive, there may be underlying concerns for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Hackberry appreciates the truck’s character, suggesting it needs a nostalgic bumper sticker, while @MisterMitch notes its age and lack of emissions requirements, emphasizing its classic appeal. @stugottz describes it fondly as a reliable old friend despite its age, and @rosstruck mentions the enjoyable nature of the truck after owning it for over 50 years, highlighting the truck’s functionality and reliability.
Neutral: @Bell_Diver inquires about the A/C’s performance, reflecting a common question among potential buyers about the vehicle’s condition. @MisterMitch seeks clarification on emissions regulations due to the vehicle’s age, indicating a practical concern for potential buyers regarding its legal operability. @Joe1239 expresses curiosity about the gear ratio and the functionality of both gas tanks, showing interest in the truck’s specifications for informed decision-making.
Negative: @rosstruck notes the engine’s knocking, indicating a need for a rebuild which could deter potential buyers concerned about repair costs. The need for a flatbed tow is also addressed, with @rosstruck stating that it cannot drive as is, which may be a disappointment for buyers looking for a ready-to-drive classic. The mention of the SPID being gone may also raise concerns about the vehicle’s history and overall value.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle’s capabilities and unique features. @Stevehatfield highlights the van’s ability to perform well even under extreme conditions, indicating it can effectively keep meat cool during the summer heat in Florida. @ZENWERKS mentions the van as a reliable, one-of-a-kind T1N with only 57k miles and emphasizes its capabilities, such as towing up to 7,500 lbs and being mechanically sound after a thorough cooling system overhaul. Additionally, @CKKurtz appreciates the rust-free condition of the vehicle, a rarity for the model, while @91crxtacy confidently states the van can endure for up to 1.5 million miles, solidifying its durability.
Neutral: Several commenters pose questions regarding the vehicle’s specifications and features. @MtConstitution queries about the air conditioning unit on the roof, while @mickeyhassey seeks to know the towing capacity, which @ZENWERKS promptly answers. @Eldonixon inquires about the interior standing height, and @Nateodio requests the exterior height, ensuring they get a complete understanding before making decisions. @Leica1963 expresses that they would be more interested if the van had a specific 118″ wheelbase. The comments reflect a keen interest in learning more about the practical aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: Comments regarding potential concerns are mostly centered on requests for information about possible issues and the condition of the engine. @mc_mark4volks expresses concern about the common issue of ‘black death’ in the engines by asking for close-up photos of the engine bay. This suggests a level of caution about the vehicle’s performance history. @Redfish28 asks about the rear benches and tire date codes, hinting at overall queries about safety and functionality. @DASenglender expresses curiosity about the seller’s reference to reserve pricing, implying uncertainty about the sale process, indicating that some viewers may be unsure of the value or integrity of the offer.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed their admiration for the vehicle’s design and history, highlighting its status as a classic. @Craven remarked on Mopar’s pioneering influence in automotive design, and @Dollycat3 praised the vehicle’s beauty and noted its museum status. @Electraglider reflected on how the rarity of such cars today makes it more appealing, especially in contrast to the more common tri-5 Chevrolets. Many noted its unique charm and the affection for classic cars from the era, with @neverenoughgold sharing a personal connection to a similar model, illustrating a fondness for the brand.
Neutral: The seller, @Wheelman9, provided an informative overview of the vehicle’s background, mentioning that it had been a maintained part of an automobile museum collection for 15 years. The seller also reassured potential buyers at the auction about the car’s condition, emphasizing that it runs and drives smoothly, with no visible rust or body repairs. @SnapCracklePop made a request for a video demonstration of the windows functioning, indicating a common interest in the car’s features, while other commenters reminisced about their past experiences with similar models, but without negative connotations.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the possibility of hidden rust or repairs, as @neverenoughgold speculated regarding the integrity of the vehicle given its age. Commenters like @neilpierson25 and @Electraglider shared mechanical memories from their own experiences with vintage models, hinting at the quirks and maintenance issues that can arise with such old cars. Additionally, the nostalgia shared by some, mixed with apprehension, pointed out that while the vehicle is a classic, its upkeep and potential challenges could deter some buyers who prefer modern reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @Racepro (The Seller) highlights the impressive lap times of the car, recording a best of 1:10’s at Big Willow Springs racetrack, showcasing its quick pace and grip. Additionally, @1171lincoln praises the vehicle’s reliability and low operating costs, stating it is a terrific option for lapping days with ample power and great fun to drive. The car is described as race-ready, with @Racepro (The Seller) confirming that it includes additional sets of wheels and $50,000 worth of extra parts that can be negotiated with the purchase, which adds value to potential buyers.
Neutral: @Racepro (The Seller) clarifies that the 20 miles mentioned in the listing was incorrectly stated due to an input error, asserting that the actual mileage is significantly more. The car is designed to be track-ready and has undergone maintenance including recent updates, such as an 18-hour engine time and 6-hour gearbox time. There are some inquiries from potential buyers regarding the condition and age of components like the fuel cell and fire system, with @Racepro confirming the functionality of these elements and offering to replace them at no charge if needed.
Negative: Some users expressed concern regarding the high operating standards and necessary checks for racing. @Autoadvantagefl questioned the low mileage and potential issues with the vehicle, seeking reassurance about its condition given the details provided. @juice301 also questioned whether the vehicle has enough power, implying possible underperformance compared to expectations. Furthermore, queries about the availability of footage of the vehicle in action remain unanswered, as @Jfant noted difficulties accessing videos associated with the listing.
|
 |
Positive: @Scirocco-S (The Seller) was responsive and accommodating in providing requested videos of the vehicle’s engine and exhaust. When asked, he promptly recorded and shared a video showcasing the engine from a cold start, as well as another video that highlighted the exhaust. This level of engagement is appreciated by potential buyers like @telluridegordon who were eager to see the vehicle in action.
Neutral: The seller, @Scirocco-S, demonstrated transparency regarding various details of the vehicle’s condition. He acknowledged issues raised by other commenters, like the possibility of inappropriate installation of the body side molding, stating that it appeared to have been screwed into the door. He also mentioned minor cosmetic concerns, such as bubbling chrome on the grille and a small dent on the left rear corner, which he clarified were visible in the pictures displayed online.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle’s condition were raised by commenters like @Bulldogger and @Nickyboi. @Nickyboi pointed out that the body side molding should be glued rather than screwed, and highlighted the presence of additional dents not mentioned by the seller. Furthermore, they took issue with the deteriorating front grille finish, emphasizing the importance of complete transparency regarding the vehicle’s condition, a sentiment echoed by @Scirocco-S, who seemingly accepted these critiques.
|
 |
Positive: @LongiMotorsports described the vehicle as a super rare 3.2 s-line prestige with a smooth 6-speed manual transmission, emphasizing that it has been well taken care of by its previous owner from Calabasas. The seller promotes the car’s overall great condition, boasting no leaks and no rattles, making it a suitable daily driver. The seller expresses personal attachment to this model, sharing that their first car was a b8 a4 avant, which adds a nostalgic touch to the listing.
Neutral: @CiponniMakaronni inquired about the car’s emission standards, specifically whether it complies with Euro 4 or Euro 5, indicating an interest in the vehicle for potential import to Europe. @hdpartsdr asked if a current smog certification would be provided for buyers in California. The seller responded positively to both inquiries, showing a willingness to assist and provide more information to potential buyers.
Negative: @pauldebhanna raised a concern about the possibility of the driver’s front fender being resprayed, indicating potential worries about the car’s history or condition. The seller did not initially see any issues but promised to post paint readings for transparency. This uncertainty about a potential respray may leave some buyers cautious about the overall integrity of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @3C454 describes the motorcycle as “very nice!” @Wilkywhips compliments the bike as an “epic” model and highlights its rarity along with low mileage and stock condition. @JohnK3 expresses excitement over the bike’s impressive 122 HP from a 750, while @ViperNC shares nostalgic memories of owning the same bike in their youth, praising its appealing color and suggesting that this example is worth considering seriously.
Neutral: @Highside7r appreciates having both P and N models and views this bike as a great collection base, noting a preference for Kawasaki’s green but still liking the offered color. @ChiPerf (The Seller) confirms that the bike’s color is indeed more stunning in person. The seller also assures potential buyers that the bike runs excellently, feels new, and has had recent servicing, including new tires.
Negative: @1995Z28LT1 finds the bike alluring but deals with the dilemma of potential spousal disapproval over acquiring a second motorcycle, joking about the need to “buy now and beg for forgiveness.” @PWRMAD is curious about viewing the bike in person, expressing uncertainty about the selling arrangements, which leads to a clarifying response from @ChiPerf (The Seller) about selling on behalf of the owner.
|
 |
Positive: @mr_smee appreciates the vehicle’s design, calling it a reflection of the Peak Jellybean era, while @ZFreakZ32 likens the Z32 300zx to wearing a tuxedo, implying it has a notably classy appearance. @Nathanatenathan (The Seller) assures potential buyers that the vehicle is currently running perfectly, with no overheating issues and a solid mechanical condition after recent comprehensive servicing. He emphasizes that everything is functioning as it should, including the windows and the stereo system, which features Bluetooth capabilities and exceptional speakers.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the vehicle’s specifications and operating conditions. @Em_d asks about the current running state of the vehicle, to which @Nathanatenathan (The Seller) promptly responds that there are absolutely no issues. @Jabrother admires the color combo, suggesting it aligns with the pinnacle era of JDM vehicles, while others inquire about the stereo system and air conditioning, which @Nathanatenathan confirms to be operating well. The conversation reflects a mix of curiosity about functionality and appreciation for the car’s aesthetic.
Negative: @The_mabman_20 delivers a critical assessment, branding the vehicle as unremarkable, with ordinary mileage and an estimated low value, comparing its situation to a ‘post turtle’—out of place and not belonging. Concerns are raised by @Nissanfan19 and @ryan2115 regarding potential flood exposure, particularly referencing historical events like Katrina. @Nathanatenathan (The Seller) denies any such exposure, describing the vehicle’s original paint and rust-free condition, but acknowledges the airbag light issue due to temporary disconnection, which might concern buyers looking for a fully operational vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @1911nineeleven (The Seller) presents an attractive car that garners positive remarks from various commenters. @Collins4A appreciates the restoration, recalling past family experiences with similar cars, while @AZkid and @cycleskipper express admiration for the vehicle’s beauty and stunning appearance. @Trifiveron dubbed the car as ‘museum quality,’ highlighting its excellence, and @Highlander63 described it humorously as resembling ‘a piece of Red Velvet Cake’ with impeccable detailing noticeable even underneath.
Neutral: Some commenters engage in a more informational tone. @Bordeaux inquires about the special-order paint of the car, hinting at a shared interest in automotive history. @MARTY_ROTH shares personal anecdotes regarding a similar model he owned, discussing features and driving experiences without expressing a clear selling desire, focusing instead on nostalgia for the vehicle’s performance and appeal. These comments add context and depth to the discussions, touching on the vehicle’s legacy.
Negative: There are no notably negative comments about the vehicle, as all feedback appears to promote a favorable image of the car. The lack of criticism suggests that the vehicle has successfully made a positive impression on potential buyers and car enthusiasts alike, with observers predominantly focusing on the car’s characteristics, history, and aesthetic appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the vehicle’s uniqueness and the thrilling experience it provides. @GrandPrixMotors emphasizes the unmatched sound of a V12 engine paired with a manual transmission, while @Peter_K. admires the idea of having a Lamborghini in Long Island, showcasing its rarity. The @seller, @Frajput, gives reassurance about the car’s driving performance, mentioning that it drives straight and has participated in long rallies without issues, which adds to its appeal. Enthusiasts like @Harry19 and @IshMoto further emphasize the culture surrounding these vehicles, creating a sense of community and admiration for this Lamborghini model.
Neutral: Some comments reflect a balanced view on the vehicle, acknowledging both its charming features and concerns regarding its history. @NIN10DO wonders which YouTuber will feature the car, indicating interest in its story, while @Gaius raises questions about the replacement of damaged panels, suggesting curiosity about its repairs. The @seller responds proactively, providing details about the car’s condition and the repairs conducted. The discussions also include inquiries about the vehicle’s performance and components, such as the clutch, which shows a level of engagement from potential buyers who want to ensure they are well-informed before making a purchase.
Negative: There are several concerns expressed about the car’s past, particularly its history of accidents and potential mechanical issues. @SlowNRusty highlights the importance of knowing the car’s repair history and the structural impacts of previous damages, indicating a cautious approach toward its maintenance. Additionally, @rdelsinore and others raise questions about the condition of various components, such as the front differential and the clutch, implying skepticism about the vehicle’s readiness for long-term ownership. Furthermore, comments from @DE302 about the replacement of the front fenders and a general distrust towards the tackiness of repairs raise red flags for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, especially regarding its overall condition and restoration quality. @BrianS praised the auction’s no reserve format and highlighted @DENWERKS as a favorite seller on BaT, showing confidence in their listing. @jpwaltz described the car as ‘very nice’ and @Hoglover appreciated the detailed responses from the seller, indicating an impressive restoration with thoughtfulness put into maintaining the car’s original aspects. The sentiment among bidders reflects excitement and high expectations for the car’s journey to a new owner, as well as overall satisfaction with the auction’s presentation.
Neutral: Comments include inquiries and additional information about the vehicle’s specifications. @DN1228 asked detailed questions about the steering and original components, receiving thorough answers from @DENWERKS, who provided insights into the car’s steering feel and original parts included with the sale. @DENWERKS emphasized the importance of reviewing multiple photos and descriptions as tools in assessing the vehicle, underlining the level of documentation that accompanies the auction. The engagement between users and the seller signifies a collaborative approach to understanding the vehicle better.
Negative: Some comments reflect a slight uncertainty or critique regarding specific features of the Corvette. @Corvettekent expressed a desire to replace the steering wheel, indicating a personal preference that may not align with the seller’s choices. Additionally, @DN1228’s detailed inquiries about the mechanical aspects, while generally appreciative, hint at concerns regarding adjustments, particularly about steering play and the absence of the original wheels. Overall, while there is mostly positive focus on the car, there remains a hint of skepticism regarding certain modifications and features.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described as an incredibly low mileage and immaculately kept 2004 Boxster S, noted for being the final year of the iconic 986 generation. The seller, @RPFMotorcars, highlights the extensive service records and recent maintenance, including an oil change, inspection, paint correction, and California SMOG certification. They assure potential buyers that the car drives great and there were no signs of metal in the oil or filter at the last change, indicating a well-maintained engine.
Neutral: Questions have been raised regarding specific vehicle features and maintenance details, including @PhilO’s inquiry about stability control (PSM) and the status of the IMS. @Aeneas137 points out the use of 5W-30 oil and its relationship to Porsche’s approval list, while @Kodiak333 asks for a deeper analysis of the oil filter and potential bore scoring issues. The seller responded to these inquiries, providing a comprehensive overview of the vehicle’s maintenance practices and clarifying the current state of the oil and potential concerns.
Negative: Some concerns have been mentioned regarding the vehicle’s condition, including a mild oil leak at the cam sensor noted by @FrancisProsciutto. There are discussions about the cooling system and the condition of the tires and shocks, with indications that the rear shocks show some seepage. Despite these concerns, the seller emphasizes that the vehicle has been well cared for with no significant issues reported during inspections, but there remains some skepticism among potential buyers about the car’s long-term reliability given its age.
|
 |
Positive: @magujia complimented the vehicle’s color combination, indicating it is visually appealing. @LandSpeedster expressed admiration for the vehicle’s reputation, calling it one of the best ever built and mentioning successful auction results. @buddysharp also appreciated the color and noted that the seats appeared to be in good condition, given the wear on the steering wheel, highlighting the overall aesthetic appeal of the car.
Neutral: @ttocs6991 (The Seller) clarified concerns about the vehicle’s history, explaining that the airbag deployment was in 2012 and that the car had been functioning well since, with all factory VIN stickers intact. The seller also provided information on the vehicle’s undercarriage condition, acknowledging it is not perfect but still solid with a good service history. @pws1205 requested more information about the interior condition and the removal of the third-row seats, which the seller confirmed is possible.
Negative: @speterson noted the undercarriage looked a bit crusty, suggesting potential issues with rust. @buddysharp echoed these concerns about rust and recommended addressing specific under-hood areas for better maintenance assurance. @Chattanooga raised questions about the lack of maintenance records from 2018 to 2025, indicating potential red flags about the vehicle’s care during that period.
|
 |
Positive: @Gary_T1 expresses a strong appreciation for the Camaro, noting that despite some opinions labeling this iteration as less desirable, its excellent condition, classic color scheme, and drop-top features make it an enticing vehicle. He highlights the joy of ownership and driving experience. @Reconjr (The Seller) enthusiastically describes the Camaro as a ‘total gem,’ emphasizing its one-owner history and reliability for long-distance driving, making it appealing to potential buyers. @aitalam recalls personal experiences with previous models, appreciating the underrated nature of the F-body cars, and recognizes their fun driving dynamics and enjoyable torque.
Neutral: @Reconjr (The Seller) provides an overview of the services performed in preparation for sale and mentions the availability of more detailed photos of the vehicle’s underside. This neutral information suggests that the car has been well-maintained and is ready for prospective buyers to evaluate its condition succinctly.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: @Aupunter (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a terrific piece of machinery that has been well-maintained, stored in a garage, and never used in adverse weather conditions. The seller is open to answering questions and showing the car to interested buyers in the Denver area. @rmurphy1990 appreciates the colors and notes that it effectively represents a new car with significant depreciation, indicating that it is a great value for potential buyers. @demegeo considers the 911 absolutely beautiful and expresses a desire to own it, recognizing it as a true gem.
Neutral: @TimBuckToo_2 inquires about the standard interior and whether it has any leather, while @QPR1 asks about the original infotainment system. @Aupunter (The Seller) clarifies that the car includes a standard complement of leather and confirms that it retains all original infotainment equipment, which is in working condition. Furthermore, @Aupunter adds that a similarly-equipped new 911 Carrera Cab would be significantly more expensive, reinforcing the value of the current car.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its unique qualities and appealing features. @Alfonse22 remarked on the vehicle’s uniqueness in the market, wishing good luck with the sale. @Bladerunner2019 found the vehicle cool and mentioned it reminded him of rival DTM cars. @DanDuran02 found the vehicle interesting, while @passamonti80 praised the beautiful Busso engine, to which @GNeverov, the seller, responded appreciatively. @NickW1 voiced a sentiment shared by many, stating that the Busso delivers the best exhaust sound, adding to the vehicle’s allure. Furthermore, @MM27 noted it has attractive upgrades and could be seen as a gem due to its low mileage, emphasizing its great appearance.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle’s condition included questions and confirmations about its features. @Russ inquired whether the AC blows cold air and suggested a video to showcase its performance, to which @GNeverov confirmed that the AC works properly. Additionally, @eisenmen asked about the last timing belt replacement, and although @GNeverov sadly mentioned there are no records, he assured that the car was well taken care of. These exchanges highlight the importance of transparency in the sale, as interested buyers seek reassurance about the vehicle’s mechanisms and condition.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle’s maintenance and condition. @MTDatsun pointed out the presence of wet spots under the car, questioning if it indicated any leaks. In response, @GNeverov clarified that the wet spots were merely from water on the driveway, though he did acknowledge some oil seepage from under the valve cover gasket. This admission could raise some concerns among potential buyers about the vehicle’s overall maintenance history and the implications of oil leakage.
|
 |
Positive: @IceBolt07 described the truck as a good looking vehicle, while @39mercman noted that it is a great LOOKING pickup. @PyrateCaptain expressed love for the paint and @Ov1guy described the truck as beautiful, contributing to a positive perception of the vehicle’s aesthetics. @priscillabat (The Seller) confirmed that the truck has a classic two-tone paint style that was period-appropriate and adds to the overall appeal, appealing to those who appreciate design history.
Neutral: @priscillabat (The Seller) provided some history regarding the truck’s grille design to clarify potential confusion about the model year, highlighting subtle changes in Ford trucks between 1936 and 1937. Additionally, she responded to inquiries about the tire markings and confirmed the details of the truck bed’s wood stain and protective finish. This information appears to satisfy some questions while adding depth to the truck’s background.
Negative: Conversely, there were concerns about the truck’s mechanical aspects, with @39mercman suggesting that the Flathead engine may need attention, especially regarding carburation. @sig40 inquired multiple times about whether the truck has an all-steel body or fiberglass components, demonstrating apprehension regarding the vehicle’s construction materials. @Jamesdean004 and @Jfred0880 both expressed uncertainty about various components of the truck, indicating some potential buyer hesitation associated with doubts about the truck’s condition and specifications.
|
 |
Positive: @toadsalesman remarked on the vehicle’s impressive specifications, expressing eagerness to see how the market will respond to it. @ferrarimyheaven also commented positively, suggesting that the future owner will truly appreciate the car. The seller, @Tuckettj22, shared their enthusiasm for the vehicle, emphasizing its special qualities and willingness to provide additional information upon request.
Neutral: Several commenters asked for more information about the car, such as @freeasagoat who requested videos to get a better understanding of the vehicle. @Hyybriid pointed out that they did not see the mentioned damage on the driver’s front wheel, showing a cautious interest in the specifics of the car’s condition. The seller clarified that there is no damage to the driver’s wheel and offered insights on the minor dings present on the passenger side front rim that occurred when hitting an object on the freeway.
Negative: There was some criticism regarding the number of photos available, with @Hyybriid suggesting that more images could lead to a better auction outcome. @Hyybriid also asked for angles of the rim damage to better assess the situation. Additionally, @NoYouJump1st raised a question regarding the payoff amount, to which @Hyybriid noted that inquiries about financial details might not lead to a tangible response.
|
 |
Positive: @UKDM praised the vehicle for rocking a UK front plate. @dmnmkmcm5 expressed enjoyment for the SVR videos, highlighting them as the best they have watched, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @maliklyu, the seller, affirmed that the vehicle has a factory exhaust with no modifications other than an aftermarket towing hitch, providing clarity on its specifications and features which could appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: @TheFlyingScot noted that the vehicle was previously listed on another CarBid site and did not sell. They pointed out the distinctive British plate, implying it was recognizable. Additionally, @Ballistic asked about the factory exhaust, the location of the vehicle, and requested maintenance records, indicating a general interest in the details of the vehicle without expressing strong opinions either way.
Negative: @Damaho912 expressed concern about the paint protection film, questioning if it was applied to the entire vehicle and specifically lamented the drilling of the front license plate into the bumper. @maliklyu, the seller, clarified that the front plate is indeed drilled, as required in Hawaii, and mentioned the towing history of the vehicle was minimal, which may not satisfy all potential buyers wanting detailed usage history.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally praised the vehicle’s unique design and aesthetic appeal. @SilverFox10 provided a playful take on the car’s appearance, referring to it as a “Datsota,” highlighting its unusual departure from standard 2-seater versions. @daddsun expressed nostalgia and admiration for the car, noting its sporty look and the nostalgic features such as rear window louvers and Enkei wheels that reminded him of a time when Z and ZX cars were common on the streets. Both comments convey a sense of appreciation for the vehicle’s style and the memories it evokes.
Neutral: A few inquiries focused on specific aspects of the vehicle, such as the functionality of the turn signals. @clone177 asked about the condition and required repairs for the turn signals, to which @Rtm414 (The Seller) promptly addressed, stating that it likely involved just a turn signal relay. @Rtm414 also confirmed his transparency regarding any issues with the car’s operation, suggesting that while the turn signals were currently not working, they likely were not a significant electrical issue, showcasing responsible communication from the seller.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding the functionality of certain parts of the vehicle. @clone177 pointed out the non-operational turn signals, which could deter potential buyers looking for a fully functional vehicle. Although @Rtm414 reassured them that repairs seemed straightforward, the mention of repair needs could be viewed as a drawback in the eyes of some buyers. Additionally, some potentially negative impressions about the vehicle’s quirks were implied by @SilverFox10’s comment, suggesting it can be seen as a mixed bag when compared to traditional models.
|
 |
Positive: @john_chamorro shared that these trucks were distinctive with their extended wheelbase and were highly regarded by those who owned them. @65Mustake reminisced about their experience with a 1978 F350 super camper special, highlighting its excellent road manners and unique features. @RNF32 (The Seller) received positive engagement, with comments from bidders expressing interest and compliments about the truck’s features and performance.
Neutral: @RNF32 (The Seller) provided detailed information about the truck, noting that the brakes are in good condition, the 8-track player works intermittently, and various components like the air filter and thermostat are new. @Breezejammer requested additional photos to assess the truck’s condition, especially under the carpet and around the cab mounts, which @RNF32 (The Seller) promptly addressed by sharing photographs and information.
Negative: Some concerns were subtly hinted at, such as @Breezejammer asking for more details regarding the truck’s flooring and cab mount condition, indicating potential worries about hidden issues. Additionally, @RNF32 (The Seller) acknowledged the truck’s unique features but expressed a reluctance to modify its original setup, reflecting a tension between preserving the truck’s character and the desire for performance upgrades. The mention of the word ‘survivor’ was noted to evoke strong feelings from @RNF32 (The Seller), indicating some discomfort with its implications.
|
 |
Positive: @mick59 highlights the impressive color combination of grey and red on the Porsche 356, praising its aesthetic appeal and acknowledging Porsche’s ahead-of-the-curve design choices. Several comments, including those from @Veneeshun (The Seller), confirm the car’s extensive restoration, detailing improvements that have been made to the engine, transmission, and interior, thereby accentuating the vehicle’s charming appearance and performance. @sbcarguy also supports the seller by appreciating the factory color combo and expressing confidence that the vehicle will do well due to its original engine and features.
Neutral: Comments from @LouFifer and @dougdadmac raise important questions about specific features and adjustments made to the car, reflecting a desire for detailed information regarding the vehicle’s upgrades and its original specifications. @ross2264 requests guidance on finding an independent facility for a pre-purchase inspection (PPI), indicating a proactive approach for potential buyers. Meanwhile, @Veneeshun (The Seller) offers transparency by inviting potential buyers to view the vehicle and confirming that they can address any inquiries regarding the car’s history and detailed restoration work.
Negative: There are several critiques from users like @jackba and @myronw, who point out various minor flaws they believe detract from the overall quality of the restoration, such as wiring issues and incorrect installations. @jackba specifically mentions the proximity of the license plate wiring to the muffler as a concern, while @myronw lists multiple technical inaccuracies related to the vehicle’s electrical system and components. These comments suggest a perceived lack of attention to detail, which could raise red flags for some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the Dodge Neon as a great car for beginners and commuters, with many users sharing their nostalgic experiences. @Nissanfan19 recalled fondly driving the car during his youth, while @Billythekiddo expressed love for his previous Neon, citing its reliability despite minor issues. Several commenters, including @Tonybwell and @Baur2002, emphasized the car’s simplicity and ease of maintenance, making it a valued choice for budget-conscious buyers.
Neutral: Commenters shared various opinions on the Neon, discussing its history and characteristics without strong emotional ties. @AFW1992 (The Seller) provided factual answers about the vehicle’s condition, mentioning the need for a recharge on the AC and the check engine light behavior. @Borton reminisced about the reliability of his Neon during his time in the military and @Stanleyvanburen pointed out typical issues such as potential head gasket failure after high mileage, indicating a mix of positive and cautionary insights.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the potential mechanical issues associated with the Dodge Neon. @Stanleyvanburen warned that the head gasket might fail after 60k miles, a long-standing issue with earlier models. @Billythekiddo shared a serious experience where rust in the K frame could have been life-threatening, hinting at manufacturing defects. Overall, while many comments reflected fond memories and appreciation, others raised warnings about the car’s long-term reliability and maintenance.
|
5.9L Cummins-Powered 2010 Ford F-450 Harley-Davidson Edition Crew Cab Dually 4×4
1FTXW4DR7AEA31716
Lot 204358
Private Party
 |
Positive: @sarahhunter26 appreciates the powerful 5.9 Cummins engine, while @albabanshee99 expresses their love for the vehicle. @PSFarm highlights the versatility of the Cummins engine swap, and @BeastRig praises it as a towing beast capable of delivering 900 hp and 1600 ft lbs of torque. The seller, @Tgomes, reassures potential buyers by emphasizing the motor’s solid construction and reliability, mentioning its robust components like 12 valve connecting rods and increased 14mm main studs.
Neutral: @chiefmet86 raises questions regarding documentation for the engine rebuild, asking when and by whom it was performed. @Tgomes provides insights into the vehicle’s specifications, acknowledging that the motor is a 2003 model with a rebuilt transmission. He confirms that all gauges, except the cruise control, are operational and includes details about the tires and the vehicle’s history, which may include maintenance inquiries from @BrettC and @jraymond123.
Negative: @chiefmet86 expresses skepticism about the lack of paperwork on the engine build, seeking clarity on modifications made to the transmission as well. Other comments from the same user indicate concerns about the functionality of the gauges based on video evidence. @ewyss18 inquires about the 4×4 system, which @Tgomes clarifies is functioning properly, albeit there are still questions surrounding the overall reliability and documentation, causing some hesitance among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, particularly noting its aesthetic appeal and potential value. @Gazhunter123 mentioned curiosity about the auction outcome, hinting that it could fetch a high price similar to previous models. @CarSalesman noted that this car is a significant improvement over its predecessor, reinforcing its desirability. @GDogg referred to it as ‘a really nice Esprit,’ wishing the seller well, while @Papa_Oscone playfully suggested an entertaining way to customize the vehicle’s plates if it was a different color.
Neutral: Comments regarding the specifics of the vehicle’s features and maintenance were largely informative, with @andrewpharo (The Seller) providing detailed information about the extras included with the car, such as a color-matched hardtop roof panel and various exhaust components. @Serious asked for clarity on whether the modified exhaust parts were installed and how they impact the existing system. Additionally, @Lotusdriver2001 highlighted California’s smog regulations regarding catalytic converters, contributing to the discussion about the vehicle’s performance capabilities and its compliance with state laws.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the previous ownership and potential issues with maintenance fees related to the vehicle. @Esprit4Me criticized the past service received at Motorcars of Atlanta and expressed frustration about exorbitant repair costs for minor issues. They also emphasized that, despite the vehicle being easy to maintain, it faced mishandling in the past. This sentiment was coupled with a cautious approach regarding the vehicle, suggesting that prospective buyers should be conscious of prior maintenance and consider more affordable service options.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the impressive build quality of the vehicle, with @acett noting it as a “Nice build!” and @CapeRace expressing surprise at loving the design, indicating it truly works well. @oregonian praised the R nineT Pure for its customizability, allowing owners to create their dream bike. Additionally, @C.Flint gave a strong endorsement, emphasizing the owner/builders attention to detail and the bike’s outstanding suspension adjustments that enhance its riding experience. Furthermore, @57charlie admired the aesthetic appeal of the spoked wheels, indicating their contribution to the bike’s adventure capabilities.
Neutral: Several comments featured discussions about specific components and modifications. @DEO inquired about the Unit Garage Dakar kit, while @cabanza asked whether the suspension was stock. In response, @RideNut elaborated on the use of a custom Öhlin’s rear shock absorber which significantly boosts the bike’s performance. Additionally, comments from @Wheresbill and @SuperKram mentioned the vehicle’s visual aspects, with @SuperKram reflecting on the usability of the R9T Scrambler with added custom panniers, indicating appreciation for its design.
Negative: On the negative side, there were few critical comments regarding technical specifics, such as @norton73 questioning how a gravity feed fuel tank was compatible with an injected bike and whether modifications were necessary. However, @RideNut clarified that the big PD tank deployed an electric fuel pump and addressed concerns about potential alterations made to accommodate technical requirements. Overall, the comments predominantly reflect a positive reception, with only minor uncertainties about certain features.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the admiration for the vehicle’s beauty, with @Abuelo noting it as a “beautiful car” and @monsoon725 expressing excitement about seeing the auction outcome. @Espanolie emphasizes the fun combination of the X50 package and manual transmission, while @PetarVN, a fellow 996 Turbo owner, appreciates the car’s performance, calling it a “gorgeous example” and expressing confidence in its appeal to potential buyers. Overall, the 996 Turbo Cab is seen as an exciting and desirable collector’s item among commenters.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around inquiries for more information about the vehicle’s condition and history. @SurfingSnowman asks about the accident details from 2023, leading to a response from the seller clarifying their inability to obtain more specific information. Others like @ahubert44 and @Slushie1998 suggest that a pre-purchase inspection (PPI) would increase buyer confidence, showing an interest in ensuring the vehicle is sound. The seller, @GenauAutoWerks, actively engages with these inquiries, providing details like service history and paint meter readings to assist potential bidders.
Negative: Some comments express concern regarding the car’s history, particularly the damage reported on the CarFax and the lack of a PPI. @ahubert44 criticizes the seller for not being proactive with documentation that could instill confidence in bidders, while @Nacoocheejohn asks for detailed paint meter readings related to any paint work done on the car. Additionally, @SendATrailer expresses the need for service records concerning a previously addressed power steering issue, suggesting apprehension about the car’s condition and urging more transparency from the seller.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle under discussion, a 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet, enjoys several positive remarks, particularly highlighting its uniqueness and suitability for specific environments like South Florida. @Msobczyk noted that it is a perfect vehicle for that area, while @joeveto emphasized the charm of being quirky. The seller, @testdummypilot, reassured potential buyers by sharing positive experiences from previous customers and emphasizing the rarity of this model, with only 1,159 produced in its first year and fewer than 6,000 across three years. Furthermore, the seller highlighted its attractive condition with detailed photos and videos to illustrate its beauty, suggesting that the vehicle surpasses expectations for those who have had the opportunity to own or view it.
Neutral: Some comments reflect a neutral stance on the vehicle, acknowledging both its appeal and limitations. @ar1950 provided a balanced view, stating that while some might find it a snug fit for passengers, it indeed turns heads due to its rarity. Additionally, @testdummypilot, although an advocate for the vehicle, acknowledged that everyone has their preferences, reaffirming that the Nissan’s design isn’t for everyone. @bowilliam raised a question regarding California’s smog regulations, to which the seller confidently responded, providing assurance about its compliance, indicating that potential buyers have genuine concerns that the seller addressed appropriately.
Negative: Conversely, a few critiques emerged regarding the vehicle’s practicality. @ar1950 expressed skepticism about the space available for passengers and luggage, suggesting it may not meet everyone’s needs. @CarFoolLane criticized the CrossCabriolet’s concept as answering a question that was never asked, implying a lack of purpose in its design. While some comments pointed out flaws, the seller, @testdummypilot, attempted to counter these criticisms by stating that the vehicle serves a specific niche and emphasizing its rarity rather than seeking mass appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @chenry210 commented on the beauty of the vehicle, appreciating its color and stance. @Barryward noted that even someone without exceptional skills, like Clarence Darrow, can enjoy this great Camaro. @swampfox13 also expressed admiration, calling it a “beautiful car, very squared away.” @RevOn_Auto (The Seller) emphasized how this ’68 Camaro converts heads and reflects the meticulous attention given during its build, as evidenced by the quality of its components and recent extensive services that prepared it for the road.
Neutral: @RevOn_Auto (The Seller) introduced the vehicle, welcoming bidders to the auction and highlighting its care, including extensive service and documentation of its history. He reassured viewers that the Camaro is ready for the driving season and has been well-maintained in a climate-controlled garage since its last auction. He actively engaged with potential bidders by addressing their questions and concerns, showing enthusiasm and readiness for an exciting auction, while also sharing visual content about the car’s features.
Negative: There were no specifically negative comments about the vehicle in the comments provided. However, there were inquiries from @swampfox13 about trunk modifications and @BigWings concerning the 4-point harness setup, which might suggest some uncertainty regarding certain features. @RevOn_Auto (The Seller) addressed these questions, indicating a willingness to clarify any concerns, maintaining a positive atmosphere among participants in the auction.
|
 |
Positive: @mgospo22 (The Seller) shared that the GL350 has been maintained in impeccable condition and boasts extensive service records and a clean two-owner history. The seller highlighted the vehicle’s great gas mileage and smooth driving experience, particularly mentioning recent improvements with new air shocks and tires. The SUV’s features, such as the 7,500lb trailer hitch, back camera, front and rear sensors, and blind spot monitoring, were also emphasized, making it a compelling choice for potential buyers looking for a reliable long-term vehicle. @housewrightconst noted that if they lived in Florida, they would sell it too, indicating a belief in its value and quality at a good price.
Neutral: Several comments focused on inquiries regarding specific features and conditions of the vehicle. @UscPhd97 and @housewrightconst asked about the air conditioning system and whether an emissions recall had been performed. @pacers35 requested information on the tire’s date codes and a video demonstrating the folding of the third-row seats. @mgospo22 responded promptly to these queries, providing detailed information, including confirmation of a cold AC system, timing chain specifics, and the status of the emission modification, which was completed in August 2022.
Negative: There do not appear to be any explicitly negative comments regarding the vehicle. The inquiries seem primarily focused on clarifying details rather than expressing dissatisfaction or concerns. Thus, the overall sentiment remains positive, with no serious criticisms noted within the provided comments.
|
 |
Positive: Multiple commenters praised the vehicle’s aesthetics and condition, with @Longbeoden expressing admiration with a simple ‘Beautiful 😍’ and @Ramboski73 noting it as a ‘Beautiful car.’ Furthermore, @Smigla mentioned the car’s perfect color and stated that it is an amazing example, which indicates enthusiasm for its preservation and overall appeal. @APUM highlighted its uniqueness, noting that only 307 SLs were made in red, reinforcing the car’s rarity and desirability. The seller, @Countrygents, provided detailed descriptions of the car’s features and maintenance history, emphasizing its pristine condition with phrases like ‘smells new,’ ‘looks new,’ and ‘drives like new,’ which further solidified a positive perception among potential buyers.
Neutral: The comments from both the seller and potential buyers included requests for additional information and clarifications. @Cars3D inquired about drive and cold start videos, to which @Countrygents confirmed they would be provided, showcasing a collaborative engagement in the conversation about the vehicle. @Yamahadave and @Cars3D discussed the transmission type of the 3000 series, displaying an interest in the technical specifications of the car. @Countrygents responded to specific inquiries with informative answers about the vehicle’s features, including its original condition and enhancements, maintaining a straightforward and informative dialogue with interested parties.
Negative: While there were mostly positive comments, there was a mention of a small chip in the windshield, acknowledged by @Countrygents, which could be a concern for potential buyers. However, this was presented transparently by the seller, who included a photo to avoid any surprises later, suggesting that while the car is in excellent condition, there are minor imperfections that potential buyers should be aware of. Overall, the comments did not contain serious criticisms of the vehicle; rather, they were largely focused on inquiries and evaluations of its current state and history.
|
 |
Positive: @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) describes the 1989 Mercedes-Benz 560 SL as being in excellent condition, having only 72,000 miles and running smoothly. He emphasizes the car’s stunning appearance with a gorgeous color combination of zero40 black over gray leather, and welcomes bidders with a wish for great success in the auction. Enthusiasts like @RadDadisRad express admiration for the car, indicating a desire to use a similar model as a daily driver. Furthermore, @MarcoDiMedici praises the vehicle’s color combo, calling it the best for the model, and appreciates its pristine nature.
Neutral: @apntra inquires about recent service records, to which @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) responds that a full service was completed last July, including an oil change before the auction. He reassures bidders about the functionality of the air conditioning and the overall performance of the vehicle. @brianbgl raises questions regarding the condition of the paint, specifically about repainting, uniformity, and the state of the soft top. The seller affirms that the soft top is excellent and the paint shines uniformly, although he does not provide a definitive answer on the history of repainting.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the car’s bodywork, particularly by @brianbgl who asks why the driver’s door and trunk were repainted, and inquires about the potential presence of fogging or yellowing on the soft top’s eisenglass. @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) admits he cannot answer all these queries definitively, suggesting that the repainting likely took place decades ago. This lack of detailed history may leave some potential buyers apprehensive about the vehicle’s maintenance and repair background.
|
 |
Positive: @Boomer243 (The Seller) describes the truck as an incredible and great vehicle, emphasizing its cleanliness and low mileage of 56000. The original window sticker which contains all specs and OEM equipment adds to its appeal. They highlight that this old school truck will turn heads and provide many more years of proud driving, suggesting that it is a great choice for those who appreciate classic cars.
Neutral: In their comments, @Boomer243 (The Seller) explains that they acquire vehicles they loved from the past and keep them in a well-maintained and climate-controlled warehouse. They mention a passion for showcasing and driving these vehicles, maintaining a collection that reflects craftsmanship and nostalgia. The seller acknowledges the necessity of space and shares a genuine appreciation for the vehicles they handle.
Negative: Although @Boomer243 (The Seller) has positive sentiments for the truck, there is an implicit sense of urgency in their comments, suggesting that while they love these vehicles, the limited space means they may have to let go of some. This could potentially highlight a concern about availability for interested buyers, urging them to act quickly to avoid missing out on this unique opportunity.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and overall condition. @tonyyagh referred to it as a beauty while @dyp911e noted that it looked great. @maw06 expressed appreciation for the care taken in maintaining the interior leather, suggesting that if the seller was diligent about conditioning the seats, the rest of the vehicle likely received similar attention. @Huracansosick and @rpibabson02 also remarked on the car’s cleanliness and beauty, with @maw06 further commenting on the standout looks of the E36 M3, affirming the high level of maintenance it has received.
Neutral: A few comments sought clarification on specific features and maintenance history of the vehicle. @kylezhen pointed out the apparent absence of a passenger side air funnel and requested additional pictures of the jacking points. Similarly, @Laffy_71 inquired about the car’s cooling system service and current suspension setup, while @MarineBanker asked about the service history and records. The seller, @baboirunner, responded to these queries by sharing insights about previous maintenance and repairs, asserting the reliability of independent shops for service over dealership maintenance. Some details regarding the headlights and the car’s title were also discussed, with @36forever and @jkershaw356 seeking more information about original headlights and the car’s ownership history.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding aspects of the vehicle that might require attention. @maw06 questioned the ‘Low Beam Failure’ alert in a video, to which @baboirunner clarified that it was a consequence of upgrading the headlights and did not indicate a malfunction. @rpibabson02 noted the presence of incorrect kidney grills and asked the seller to elaborate on the car’s accident history. Furthermore, there was some confusion from @e36forever regarding the number of owners stated in the Carfax compared to the listing. The seller acknowledged these queries but indicated some uncertainties about minor service records.
|
 |
Positive: @wngrog noted that the vehicle is a nice looking survivor, and @Yellow_Jacket echoed this sentiment by stating it is a nice looking truck. @Duke03 described the rig as beautiful and wished the seller good luck with the sale. The seller, @MideastClassicsLLC, highlighted that the 1979 FJ45 pickup is in mint condition, primarily original with only partial repaints, emphasizing its status as a barn find. Overall, the vehicle received positive remarks for its aesthetic appeal and condition.
Neutral: Multiple commenters engaged in technical discussions about the vehicle’s equipment and features. @Yellow_Jacket raised specific questions about the seat belts and the rejection sticker on the windshield, showing interest in understanding more about the truck’s registration requirements. @Duckboss inquired about the braking system, asking if the truck had disc or drum brakes. The seller provided clear answers and clarified that the front brakes are drums, while addressing the seatbelt concerns and offering insights about the vehicle’s inspection status.
Negative: @moneybags pointed out that California has regulations that may disallow registration, expressing disappointment about this beautiful truck. @Vos1593 raised concerns about potential bondo in the truck bed, questioning the origins of the dots and circles they noticed. @wdsteven worried about the vehicle’s ability to register due to the “Rejection” sticker and mentioned a dent in the drive shaft, adding a note of caution regarding possible vibrations.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praised the vehicle, calling it beautiful and looking better than ever. @whipcity76 appreciated the vintage aspect of the W108 and noted its hand-built quality and attention to detail, which signifies time-consuming craftsmanship. Another comment from @enthusiastic_enthusiast expressed awe, claiming the car was worth far more than the current bid, indicating potential value appreciation among collectors or enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Redbaron95 initially felt a sense of excitement upon seeing the vehicle’s headline image, only to be slightly disappointed when he realized it was brown, but he acknowledged that the interior color complemented the exterior well. @mlmustang100, the seller, shared that the car was featured in the TV show “Pushing Daisies,” providing an interesting historical context. @relectricmotors requested clarification on the car’s registration status and asked if the seller could provide videos of the vehicle.
Negative: @zmeu raised suspicions about the vehicle’s ownership history, suggesting it was odd for a car to have several owners in a short span, indicating potential issues with maintenance. @Snobbig and @Dollycat3 highlighted a lack of interest and seller engagement, suggesting that poor communication from the seller could harm the auction’s success. Additionally, @LaneFM requested detailed information about the car’s condition and highlighted a need for transparency regarding imperfections and functionality issues.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors expressed admiration for the vehicle’s aesthetics, particularly noting the ‘Gorgeous Mountain Gray over Gray with Carbon Fiber Trim’ mentioned by @aegmotorsports. Enthusiasts like @HAPPY highlighted the vehicle’s impressive performance, referencing stock acceleration times and modifications that enhance speed. Overall, the vehicle is perceived as not only visually appealing but also as a high-performance option in its class, drawing positive feedback about its exciting capabilities.
Neutral: Several comments contained inquiries about the vehicle’s features and condition, with @RE1 asking whether it has Apple CarPlay, and @DeanFrat70 seeking information on the functionality of the moonroof, last brake and tire replacement dates, and the working condition of the air conditioning. @Electricchair125 noted the presence of only one key fob, indicating a common concern among potential buyers about spare keys. These queries reflect a level of interest, showing potential buyers are invested in understanding the vehicle better before making decisions.
Negative: Some potential concerns were raised about the vehicle’s condition and maintenance history. @DeanFrat70 specifically mentioned issues with moonroof reliability, a common problem for this model, and asked about the vehicle’s maintenance records, which @aegmotorsports confirmed are not available. Furthermore, @RE1’s question regarding Paint Protection Film (PPF) indicates that some buyers are cautious about the vehicle’s surface protection. The absence of detailed service records raises potential red flags for buyers wary of hidden maintenance issues, and there was disappointment over the lack of Apple CarPlay, which was not supported in 2015 models.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters have expressed their admiration for the vehicle’s aesthetics and performance. @KP777 noted that the wheels look really good on the R129 SL and praised the engines and transmissions as “bulletproof.” @famous complimented the color and mentioned the reasonable mileage, showing enthusiasm for the car’s overall condition. @TheDubs highlighted the lovely color of the vehicle and its good condition for being over 25 years old, wishing the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: There were some inquiries about the reasons behind the sale of the vehicle. @querubas1 asked about why the car was being sold, while @Cruisermorgan shared their personal desire to own a similar model despite a preference against black or gray interiors. @Gary_T1 discussed auction dynamics, clarifying bidding details and the potential for resell margins, indicating an understanding of the market surrounding classic vehicles.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle’s condition. @famous pointed out an issue with the driver’s door lower panel that appeared to be coming off, suggesting that it should have been addressed before listing the car. @Mateol questioned a piece of cardboard on the passenger side A-pillar, indicating a possible red flag. Additionally, @IceyDan310 voiced hesitation about moving from a 1998 R129 SL2 to this vehicle due to engine performance differences, reflecting a level of caution among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly noting its beauty and rarity. @Pilot_Fred remarked on how the Monospecchio Flying Mirror elevates the car to a different league of desirability, describing it as ‘rare and beautiful’ and wishing the seller good luck. @Madmap echoed this sentiment, highlighting the ownership journey of the Testarossa as a thrilling experience while celebrating its classic features that elevate it to collectible status. @TheWev pointed out the car’s iconic status within the Ferrari lineup, drawing parallels to other notable classic cars and underscoring the importance of preserving such legacy models.
Neutral: Comments also reflect a cautious appreciation for the Testarossa, focusing on the technical aspects and service requirements. @bobway and @AUG1021 raised questions about necessary services like belt changes, which could be a significant investment for potential buyers. Meanwhile, @Read33 offered context on market trends, suggesting that despite its production numbers, the Testarossa’s unique qualities make it a collectible car. @ksd1861 provided insight into the maintenance costs associated with the vehicle, emphasizing that while expenses can be high, they’re manageable and vary widely depending on the service provider.
Negative: On the flip side, some users expressed critical views regarding the Testarossa’s practicality and maintenance challenges. @Geewagens shared a negative experience, portraying the Testarossa as more of a visual spectacle than a reliable grand tourer. @Nazme pointed out that a major service is likely due soon, with potential costs looming around $20,000, which could deter some buyers. @E-TypeOTS warned about aging belts and necessary updates that could overshadow immediate enjoyment. Overall, these comments highlight concerns about the vehicle’s upkeep amidst its allure and desirability.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciate the craftsmanship and quality of the sidecar rig. @Mordizzle refers to it as a “Frankin-Bimmer” and expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle. @originalbob acknowledges the aesthetic appeal and engineering of the URAL/BMW conversion, highlighting the thoughtful modifications like the BMW chassis and modern motor. @Motogrotto praises the seller’s sidecar rig as beautiful and notes that Boxerworks is a reputable expert in constructing sidecar rigs, emphasizing the quality of such builds.
Neutral: @xrttman, the seller, clarifies aspects of the vehicle’s title, mentioning the ‘conditional’ notation that applies due to the vehicle’s age and its first-time titling in Georgia. He explains the braking system of the bike, indicating that it operates well and can be used in conjunction with the sidecar’s foot-operated brake. This practical information helps potential buyers understand the vehicle’s features better without expressing a clear preference.
Negative: While the comments are largely positive and neutral, there is a subtle indication of past experiences and hesitations regarding the purchase of unique motorcycles. For instance, @Ram3k reflects on a previous opportunity to buy a resto-mod that he passed on, hinting that the market for such vehicles can be competitive and prices can be a concern. However, there are no explicitly negative remarks directed at the seller or the vehicle itself.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the features and specifications of the 2017 Mercedes Benz W166 GLE350. @aegmotorsports (The Seller) highlighted its comprehensive Premium P01 Package, including offerings like Apple CarPlay, Premium sound systems, and safety features such as the Blind Spot Assist and Parking Assistance Package. The vehicle’s aesthetic, paired with its useful accessories like key fobs and first aid kits, enhances its appeal as a luxury SUV, and positive remarks can also be found regarding the included Michelin Defender tires and the ambient lighting.
Neutral: Several potential buyers expressed curiosity about specific performance features and comparisons with other models like the GLE450. @Fahrvergnugen7 sought clarification on the differences between the GLE350 and GL450, showing an interest in the vehicle’s engine and design evolution over generations. @beachhead61 also inquired about practical aspects such as tire age and Apple CarPlay availability, indicating a balanced view of the vehicle which caters to both luxury and functionality.
Negative: Some negative notes emerged concerning a lack of clarity on certain elements of the vehicle. @4umybaby questioned if the GLE350 had Xenon or LED headlights, revealing concerns about the headlight quality. Additionally, @aegmotorsports (The Seller) had to clarify misperceptions about LED flickering in the videos, which detracts from the overall visual appeal of the car. The uncertainty expressed in technical details showcases the need for clearer initial information for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @ToyBoy2 expressed sentimental feelings towards the bike, calling it their ‘first love’ and showing enthusiasm for its restoration. @AJahnACS (The Seller) provided detailed descriptions of the bike’s condition, emphasizing its rarity and extensive restoration, including work done on the engine and components to make it run like new. Additionally, @SteveMiller complimented the bike’s appearance, while @Garlicman appreciated the sound of its engine, indicating a positive perception of its aesthetics and performance.
Neutral: @AJahnACS (The Seller) clarified information about the bike’s history, stating that it came from a notable collection and that the title is in the previous owner’s name. They also noted that the bike is located in Seattle and offered to provide further information, including videos or photos. @TEJ_21 asked questions about the title and the bike’s registration status in Washington, receiving informative responses from the seller.
Negative: @TEJ_21 raised concerns regarding the title being in the previous owner’s name and the registration in Washington, indicating potential issues for prospective buyers. @AJahnACS (The Seller) also acknowledged complications related to the mirrors being the wrong size thread, showing that while the restoration is extensive, there are still details to be worked out before the sale is finalized.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong enthusiasm for the vehicle being auctioned, particularly highlighting its unique qualities as a V8 conversion 944 and its connection to a worthy cause, Teen Driving Solutions. @speed.house emphasizes the car’s impressive performance, having been prepped for auction, and the potential it holds for safe driving education. Commenters like @RecoveringAtty and @lilcuda express excitement about the car’s speed and handling, with @Beyfon and @TooSmallGarage sharing positive personal experiences with the Teen Driving Solutions program, reinforcing the auction’s charitable angle. Overall, many contributors appreciate the fun and spirited nature of the car, with some even making light-hearted remarks about racing attire.
Neutral: There are several requests for further information about the vehicle, indicating a mix of curiosity and caution among potential bidders. Commenters such as @Klm50 and @2k7gtcs inquire about practical details like the car’s VIN, title verification, and technical specifications, including its fluid management and performance statistics. @ILikePi raises questions about the car’s weight distribution after the modifications, showing interest in how the V8 conversion has altered fundamental aspects of the vehicle. Additionally, commenters express interest in the driving characteristics and racing history of the car, suggesting an expectation for detailed performance data to back up its capabilities.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns or skepticism about specific aspects of the vehicle. @daericks questions the lack of documented race results for a car that has been in existence for 20 years, indicating a desire for proof of its racing pedigree. @Sam298 and @user9078 point out potential issues with leaks and tuning, questioning the vehicle’s reliability based on its performance as seen in a video. @CWRJosh and @Racecarguy0331 also pose technical questions about the vehicle’s cooling and exhaust setup, which might imply apprehension regarding the modifications made. Overall, there is a blend of excitement overshadowed by requests for assurance on the car’s condition and performance.
|
 |
Positive: @matthews_727 praised the vehicle’s aesthetic, calling the video showcasing it a cinematic masterpiece and wishing the seller good luck. @Calijlmn expressed nostalgia for the 325is model and highlighted the M50 engine as the best, indicating interest in possibly participating in the sale. @sohara12 encouraged the owner to fully utilize the car’s potential and suggested making it a Spec3 build, demonstrating enthusiasm for the vehicle’s capabilities.
Neutral: @dimitriparis inquired about the clutch condition and modifications to the fender walls, showing interest in the technical details of the car. @bmanskate provided responses regarding the clutch change history and confirmed the vehicle’s modifications are limited to BC coil-overs and polyurethane bushings, explaining that the fenders are stock. Additionally, @dimitriparis asked about the headliner condition, which @bmanskate addressed by sharing pictures as part of the selling process.
Negative: @theskreets raised concerns regarding an oil leak and asked about its severity. @bmanskate clarified that the leak is minimal, with only wet patches around the valve cover and assured potential buyers by stating it is not dripping. @dimitriparis also asked about rust, prompting @bmanskate to affirm the vehicle has been garage kept with no rust or body modifications, aiming to alleviate concerns about the car’s condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters shared their admiration for the vehicle, emphasizing its aesthetic appeal and quality. @campodf called it a “nice looking diesel rig” and wished @Dave.quattro good luck with the sale. @Big450 praised the vehicle as a “very clean, well represented unit,” highlighting the smooth ride provided by aftermarket components. The seller, @Dave.quattro, responded positively to the feedback, noting the extensive service history and upgrades performed on the car, which he described as a “blast to drive.”
Neutral: Several comments focused on the technical aspects of the vehicle, particularly regarding the tuning and servicing done. @Dheffel1 inquired about the service receipts and details about the tuning options available, to which @Dave.quattro promptly promised to share the invoice from Porsche for transparency. Commenters also asked about specific features like the aftermarket rear camera and the Eurowise bull bar, indicating a curiosity about the vehicle’s modifications and their impacts on functionality. @PaulGinAZ mentioned having seen the car multiple times, reinforcing its perceived quality and well-maintained condition without a strong bias either way.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns or questions that cast doubt on certain aspects of the vehicle. @DanD04 pointed out what seemed to be inconsistencies with tire pressures and dashboard warning lights, which could imply issues or oversight in maintenance. There were also inquiries about additional modifications needed to comply with emissions regulations, particularly from @hammerhead_77, who questioned the labor involved in re-enabling DEF and EGR systems. Overall, while most commenters were positive, these questions indicate potential buyers might have lingering doubts about ease of ownership and maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its appealing aesthetics and well-maintained condition. @MichaelRyerson describes it as a ‘beautiful’ and ‘near perfect muscle hauler,’ indicating that it’s fun to drive. @Kode-G expresses admiration for the 1968 model’s iconic front end, while @JimmoVette praises its striking Grotto Blue color, noting that it looks stunning in various lighting. The seller, @slip60, shares their experience of the vehicle, showcasing it as a dependable daily driver and complimenting its ride quality after recent upgrades, which include safety and comfort enhancements. Overall, the vehicle’s looks and performance seem to impress many viewers who have commented positively.
Neutral: Several comments touch on technical aspects and requests for more information, suggesting that while the vehicle is seen as attractive, some potential buyers are interested in understanding it better. @KWAChevyGuy states that replacing the headliner could have been wise, hinting at a minor area for improvement. @prohome48 asks about the axle ratio when discussing performance features. @ggalfer expresses curiosity for a cold start and driving video, suggesting they are interested in assessing its operation on the road. These neutral comments indicate that while admirers appreciate the vehicle’s looks, they seek further clarification on specifics before making decisions.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about certain aspects of the vehicle. @KWAChevyGuy critiques the headliner, suggesting it should have been prioritized for replacement. @ggalfer also agrees with this point, highlighting it as a potential drawback. Additionally, @Kiddoskid19 inquires about the changes made to the rocker arms and push rods, implying there may be underlying issues worth investigating. These negative comments underscore that while the vehicle is lauded for its aesthetics and performance, some potential buyers have lingering concerns that need to be addressed.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its impressive qualities and desirability. @Crovet expresses excitement about the S54 engine and driving experience, referring to it as ‘weekend nirvana.’ @JACO001 appreciates the powerplant while emphasizing that the E85 model represents a better platform. @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 and @NoSpeedLimits both commend the car’s beautiful color combination, with @NoSpeedLimits noting it as a refreshing change from typical colors. @Segura911 encapsulates the general sentiment by calling it ‘stunning’ and ‘simply perfect in every way,’ while @fotontom refers to it as the ‘grail of e85 M’s,’ indicating its sought-after status.
Neutral: Several users are seeking more information about the vehicle’s condition and maintenance history. @sticktothepast comments on the importance of service records and repairs for potential bidders. @Segura911 asks specific questions regarding the car’s maintenance records, including whether any panels have been repainted. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) responds to many inquiries, stating that the vehicle appears well-kept with no active leaks and details regarding recent oil changes. The seller’s assurances and transparency seem to offer a balanced view, though they acknowledge the lack of documented paint work history, resulting in further inquiries from potential buyers.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the vehicle’s condition, primarily focusing on the paintwork and potential modifications. @Segura911 and @smalls1313 suggest that some images may have been altered due to inconsistencies in visible scratches. This creates doubt about the authenticity and thoroughness of the vehicle’s presentation. Furthermore, @Segura911 pushes for more transparency regarding service documentation and specific repairs, hinting at apprehensions about the absence of complete records. Overall, these concerns portray a cautious viewpoint among prospective bidders, despite the overwhelming praise for the car’s aesthetics and overall appeal.
|
33-Years-Owned, 283-Powered 1957 GMC 100 Panel Truck NAPCO 4×4 4-Speed
101PT5258
Lot 204350
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commentors agree on the aesthetic appeal and impressive transformation of the vehicle, highlighting its visual beauty and potential as a fun weekend ride. @clemchet describes it as a ‘pretty cool rig,’ suggesting that it could be an enjoyable vehicle for casual use. @Dollycat3 admires the ‘absolutely gorgeous transformation’ of the truck, and @Seanogue emphasizes its cleanliness and maintained condition, exclaiming ‘WOW!’ @forrestGump also contributes with ‘Uber cool,’ further reinforcing this positive reception.
Neutral: Several comments provide information or observations about the vehicle’s features and components, particularly relating to its mechanics and potential modifications. @650GT3 asks a specific question about the brake master cylinder and its location, while @2milgroove shares his own experience with a similar truck, clarifying where the brake master cylinder is mounted. This exchange serves a practical purpose for potential buyers or enthusiasts, as does @Marine_1’s estimation that the vehicle could sell for over $40,000, which reflects interest without expressing strong opinions either way.
Negative: There are fewer negative comments, but there is a hint of caution or humor in @barryward’s comment suggesting the new owner should ‘put away your flannel’ if they buy the vehicle, which may imply a critique of the vehicle’s image or perceived style. Additionally, there is an acknowledgment from @maw06 that while the panel truck has a lot of potential as a project, it presents itself as a ‘great big blank canvas’ implying that there might be some necessary work to be done to make it suitable for modern standards.
|
 |
Positive: @topduarte mentions that this is a very nice first-year C4 ZR1 with low mileage, making it an appealing option for car enthusiasts who want to maintain its value while enjoying it during car shows or casual drives. @Bmarcum emphasizes the car’s potential as a solid investment, noting that it can be driven without much concern for depreciation. @zyal8r admires the pristine condition of this 1990 model, highlighting the importance of having it serviced by a trusted specialist like @MarcHaibeck, who enhances the car’s pedigree.
Neutral: Several comments reference the vehicle’s service history and condition. @C4geek points out the significance of recent servicing by a ZR-1 specialist, which adds credibility to its quality. Commenters like @rgilson7 clarify the confusion regarding the automatic and manual transmission options mentioned in the window sticker. Meanwhile, @Fellscreek notes market trends indicating that many similar ZR1s are currently being auctioned, suggesting an active interest in these models.
Negative: Some comments question the reliability of the information provided. For instance, @Pmusgerg inquires about the vehicle’s emissions status and the history of various fluids and components. @Muttsydog1 raises concerns about discrepancies in the transmission type stated on the window sticker. Complaints are also echoed by @Craven regarding the car’s history of limited use over 35 years, which could be seen as either a testament to its preservation or a red flag regarding its drivability in recent years.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed awe and appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive condition and rarity, particularly noting its low mileage of just 22,000. @Nibo remarked on the glory of the car, while @EricHollis described it as gorgeous. @Frank_Barrett emphasized the rarity of such exceptional cars, stating that it is hard to find one like this. @Jonesy66 referred to it as a unicorn and noted its beauty, and @georgepehanick praised it as the best mid-size luxury performance sedan from 2003. @maw06 shared a touching story about the vehicle’s sentimental value, recalling how it was previously owned by the seller’s mother, illustrating the car’s connection to family and love for automobiles.
Neutral: The seller, @AKB47, provided insightful information about the vehicle’s condition, confirming it has been maintained in excellent shape, kept garaged, and driven only on weekends. The seller expressed gratitude for the kind comments and shared details about the vehicle’s history, including that it was gifted by their late mother and has never been modified. @SlowNRusty noted the difficulty of finding low-mileage E55s in excellent condition and commented on the potential challenges of sourcing parts for these vehicles. Several inquiry comments focused on specific features and asking for additional pictures, such as seat conditions and air conditioning functionality, indicating a general interest in both the car’s performance and cosmetic aspects.
Negative: While the comments were predominantly positive, there were some inquiries expressing concern about the vehicle’s overall upkeep. @SlowNRusty pointed out the difficulty with Mercedes-Benz changing its parts availability model, which could pose future challenges for owners. Additionally, @ironic1499 asked for clarification regarding damage seen in specific images, indicating there might be slight concerns about the car’s condition despite the seller’s assurances of its maintenance history. Overall, while the reception was largely favorable, the comments showed a cautious interest in verifying the car’s condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many viewers expressed admiration for the vehicle, describing it as stunning and a great addition to any classic collection. @Bumpy noted the car was highly optioned, which contributes to its appeal, while @Dollycat3 praised its beauty, referring to it as an “Absolutely beautiful Alamo Beige GP.” @HemiEddie426 commented on the car’s design, emphasizing the crisp lines of the ’64 models and how great the back end looks. Others like @915fan mentioned their nostalgia tied to the Grand Prix name and recognized its unique features like factory A/C and power windows, appreciating the car’s condition and color.
Neutral: Several comments were more informational or inquisitive in nature. @RBROWN2707 expressed interest in seeing the car in person, indicating a potential buyer’s enthusiasm. @Driftpinto (The Seller) replied positively to queries about visiting and offered assistance with arrangements. @Pfeil provided detailed insights about the car’s features, pointing out the cold start light and tail light issues, requesting clarification on the A/C functionality, and suggesting the need for a vacuum schematic for optimal operation. @Driftpinto confirmed he purchased the car from a collector and provided more technical information about its current functioning.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle were raised as well. @Pfeil highlighted potential issues with the A/C and the cold start light not functioning properly, which could be seen as liabilities for potential buyers. While @HemiEddie426 jokingly lamented not being in a better climate for car enthusiasts, the conversation about navigating different weather conditions drew attention to the challenges car owners might face. @aamccrary remarked humorously on the conversation’s diversion into weather, signaling some viewers found the off-topic discussions grating. Overall, there were hints of skepticism regarding the vehicle’s readiness for sale given the noted issues.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters like @DavidFJ appreciate the vehicle, calling it “another FJ43 beauty!” and showing excitement about its visual appeal. @timberframe compliments the restoration work, stating it’s “nicely done” despite being a bit heavy on the chrome. The restoration has been well-received, and @Gregorycbarnett expresses interest in the modifications by asking if the top is welded on, indicating a positive engagement with the vehicle’s features. Additionally, @Akamai1 expresses agreement with @timberframe’s views, suggesting a shared appreciation among the community for the vehicle’s attributes.
Neutral: The topic of the ‘bezel flip’ has sparked curiosity among some commenters. @goldenbear53 seeks clarification on what a bezel flip is and why it is commonly discussed, showing that some members are still learning about certain aspects of the vehicle. @Chamba provides a thorough explanation of the bezel usage and its history, helping to educate others in the discussion. Meanwhile, @911r (The Seller) contributes driving and walkaround videos of the vehicle, serving as neutral updates that showcase its features without necessarily swinging the sentiment positively or negatively.
Negative: However, not everyone is completely on board with every modification. @Chamba raises a question regarding the decision to weld the top on, describing it as an odd modification and critiquing the incomplete manner in which the seam was filled in. This opens up a discussion about the practicality and aesthetic implications of such changes. The mixed reactions to the chrome-heavy restoration by @timberframe also illustrate that while some may appreciate the effort put into the vehicle, others feel it may detract from its authenticity.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, describing it as stunning and beautifully crafted. @Overextended remarked that the car is as good as it gets, while @PSFarm humorously mentioned being in love with it. @svatem and @OldIron138 highlighted the high-quality restoration work done, with the latter stating that Lowrey’s Auto Restoration produces exceptional results. Comments also praised the vehicle’s appealing color scheme, with @ShineOn specifically noting the charm of the burgundy and red and the unique headlights. Overall, there is a strong recognition of the car’s aesthetic and engineering qualities.
Neutral: Several comments addressed the vehicle’s title and lien status, with @Jharrison (The Seller) clarifying that there is no lien on the car despite previous confusion. The seller provided details about Rhode Island’s title regulations for older cars and confirmed the car’s qualification as a titled 1932 Ford highboy. Commenters, including @cnj1933, raised questions about the vehicle’s identification and the specifics of the title, reflecting a general interest in ensuring the car’s legitimacy and assessing any legal concerns that come with purchasing a classic vehicle. @VintageSteelBoy inquired about the headlights and their history, showing that there is much curiosity regarding the car’s detailed features.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some commenters about potential issues with the vehicle’s title and lien status. @cnj1933 pointed out specific legal challenges that could arise in Arizona due to the title’s lien notation. @Phat40 and @squareD expressed the need for a photo of the title to verify the information and to protect against potential issues related to constructed VIN numbers or out-of-state title complications. @ks510 noted an inconsistency regarding the vehicle being labeled as a ‘Hiboy,’ which may confuse prospective buyers about its designation, while others questioned the implications of an original frame with a previous title number. Such comments reflect a wider concern among bidders about ensuring clear documentation and the vehicle’s pedigree.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express a strong admiration for the 916 SPS, highlighting its outstanding performance and legendary status among motorcycle enthusiasts. @Floridaman61 refers to it as a ‘very nice, very unmolested motorcycle,’ while @Hondair (The Seller) emphasizes the bike’s factory upgrades that enhance its speed and handling, stating it is in ‘a completely different league than the standard 996.’ @Deniz.928 expresses a personal desire, saying ‘Beautiful bike. Always wanted one of these,’ and @GorgeousTobyFlamethrower comments on its amazing looks and sound, calling it the perfect ‘high-quality driver.’ There’s an overall consensus that this bike is a coveted collector’s item, given its rarity and the attention it commands from serious buyers.
Neutral: Many comments revolve around the specifics of the bike, such as its maintenance history, features, and discrepancies in the details provided about the engine and model specifications. @SSlinkard questions the MPH speedometer being in a UK bike, and @ripper996 raises concerns about the bike’s timing belt replacement timeline, mentioning the need for verification and service invoices. @Hondair (The Seller) actively participates in discussions, providing information about the bike’s service and updates on maintenance activities, including plans for a timing belt replacement and an oil change to ensure the bike is well-prepared for the new owner. Comments exchange technical details about the bike’s composition and the enjoyment of riding it, providing valuable insights for prospective buyers.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, there are a few mixed concerns and criticisms. @ripper996 points out the potential risk of starting the bike with old timing belts, which should ideally be changed every two years or 12,000 miles, expressing skepticism regarding the maintenance record. @javiercirio voices a personal aesthetic preference, stating that the gold wheels cheapen the bike’s look and doesn’t align with what he expected from a premium model. Furthermore, there is some banter about the practicality of riding such a high-performance bike in everyday settings, with @Workshirk arguing that it’s ‘the worst bike ever to ride slowly.’ Overall, while the majority view the bike as an exceptional piece, these few voices of caution add a layer of complexity to the auction process.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciate the aesthetics of the vehicle, with @lunchbocks2002 highlighting its appealing paint and wheel combination, suggesting it looks well-maintained and not heavily driven in recent years.
Neutral: Many commenters are seeking additional information about the vehicle’s condition and history. @Glide asked about the original window sticker and the meaning of ‘Vehicle reconditioned’ on the Carfax. @TooManyTabs is looking for details regarding reported damage and service history, while @Kdouty (The Seller) has started to provide pictures showing repairs and reconditioning work done in 2018 and 2025.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding possible issues with the vehicle. @TooManyTabs questioned the status of the wheels, noting some cosmetic damages, while others like @baypoint and @TG205 are inquiring about the supercharger replacement under warranty, indicating worry about the vehicle’s maintenance and condition.
|
 |
Positive: @sperry34 (The Seller) confidently claims that the car is in good operational condition and has no driveability issues, stating that it could be driven anywhere in the country without problems. They also mention that the air conditioning works wonderfully and that the car has been reliable enough to be driven once or twice a month over the past four years. Additionally, they assert that the car has a used engine and transmission with only 50K miles on them, which may appeal to potential buyers looking for a dependable vehicle.
Neutral: Commenters have expressed concerns related to the vehicle’s condition, including a query about the car’s mileage and maintenance history, particularly regarding the replacement engine and transmission. There are requests for documentation indicating the replacement details, compression numbers, and a cold start video to verify the car’s functionality. Some potential buyers also want to confirm if essential features like A/C and heat work, along with questions about recent driving experiences.
Negative: Critics highlight various issues that suggest the car shows significant wear and tear, such as torn door cards, cracked steering wheel leather, and a missing A/C vent fin. @tetsuo17 points out the misaligned front bumper and missing driver’s side door lock as signs of the car’s age at 159K miles. Additionally, questions about the car’s prolonged listing on the market imply concerns about its desirability or value for the asking price.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight a strong appreciation for the vehicle’s historical value and craftsmanship. @Johnny1eye expresses a desire to use it for everyday errands, suggesting its reliability and charm, while @jimreillyjmr praises the car’s original condition and hopes the winner keeps it as is for shows. @Electraglider recounts fond memories of a Franklin from his family’s history, showcasing the car’s reputation for performance and endurance, especially in challenging terrains. Additionally, @cyclemikey acknowledges the vehicle’s authenticity and character despite its rough edges, emphasizing its status as a treasured piece of history.
Neutral: Comments from @iya0yas, the seller, provide detailed information about the car’s provenance and history. He mentions that the previous owner maintained the vehicle in good condition, primarily using it for parades and displays. The seller also emphasizes the value of the H.H. Franklin Club as a resource for enthusiasts, which adds to the attractiveness of owning this car. Furthermore, @rvman1954 and @Crazy_Canadian inquire about specific features and performance capabilities, demonstrating a range of questions typical from prospective buyers, reflecting curiosity rather than strong opinions.
Negative: Some comments reveal concerns or skepticism regarding the car’s condition and potential issues. @ebraysmith and @Vdozen mention the need for some adjustments in the driving technique and mechanical aspects like clutch issues. @cyclemikey questions the vague references to a ‘tune-up’ and criticizes the transparency of the seller regarding the car’s running issues, suggesting that the seller should provide clearer details about the car’s condition. This combined insight hints at a perceived need for a more thorough evaluation and disclosure from the seller.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm about the McLaren 720S, particularly noting its performance and overall package. @essrt8 praised the car, claiming the 720S and the 750S offer the best bang for the buck in the supercar market, highlighting their ride quality, handling, speed, and comfort. @boaboyoz admired the aesthetic appeal of the Silica White build, calling it beautiful, while @jpentreprises (The Seller) confirmed their positive experience with the car, noting regular maintenance and an incredible driving experience thanks to the tune and titanium exhaust.
Neutral: Several commenters sought specific clarifications about the car’s features and maintenance, indicative of a cautious approach to its performance modifications. @mysidro and @willproblose inquired about the shocks and accumulated wear items, expressing the need to know more about the component replacements as part of the vehicle’s maintenance history. @fauxshowpony acknowledged the vehicle’s attractive specs and requested maintenance logs, indicating interest but also a need for reassurance regarding its condition.
Negative: There were a few concerns raised by commenters regarding the car’s history and condition, particularly about the presence of original components and maintenance specifics. @Nerfherder asked about the original trunk lid and spoiler, while @adianaty and @iwillproblose sought information about stock parts and potential wear items, such as the accumulators, hinting at caution surrounding the vehicle’s modifications and the need for transparency in previous repairs.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight a few positive aspects regarding the vehicle, particularly its impressive power and lap times. @2FAM, the seller, mentions that the 2019 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Coupe Track Car is equipped with a custom tune producing 590 WHP, and recorded lap times of 1:53 at VIR and 2:10 at Sebring have caught the attention of several enthusiasts. @MasterDebator and @53yoks expressed excitement over the car’s capabilities, with @MasterDebator calling it ‘awesome’ and @53yoks comparing its temperament to a ‘Yellow Jacket’ and noting its impressive appearance. Additionally, @Addicted2Torque shared their thrilling reaction to the vehicle’s lap footage, indicating the car’s performance is noteworthy.
Neutral: Several comments provide a neutral perspective regarding the vehicle’s specifications and its potential for modification. @RUQWIKR inquired about the corner weights and tuning specifics, while @root66 asked about weight and footage of the car in operation, reflecting a technical interest in the car’s setup. @Scott30 raised questions about the vehicle’s street legality and emissions compliance, to which @2FAM confirmed it is street legal depending on the state but will not pass emissions, suggesting that it can be driven to the track at the buyer’s discretion. Comments such as these indicate that viewers are keen on understanding the car’s track-oriented modifications and real-world usability.
Negative: There are a few critical comments that point out concerns regarding the vehicle’s design and usability. @RaiderSmiley noted the unconventional interior door release mechanism by Anderson Composites, implying a lack of refinement in the car’s design. @tmal60 raised a question about the absence of track video despite the car being called a track car, suggesting a perceived inconsistency in its branding. Additionally, @dgreenberg pointed out rattling noises in a posted POV video, to which @2FAM responded that the rattles are due to the full roll cage and lack of sound deadening, indicating some trade-offs made for the setup may be off-putting to some prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlighted the impressive condition of the vehicle, with @BDAS (The Seller) noting that the 2010 Mercedes-Benz GLK350 4MATIC is an ‘absolute beauty’ and has a rich service history backed by 34 dealer records. They affirmed the vehicle is in exceptionally clean condition, accident-free, with low mileage of only 60,580 miles. @Herford shared personal positive experiences, stating that the GLK serves as a good tow vehicle, while another comment confirmed that the vehicle’s A/C blows cold, further emphasizing its reliability and performance.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarifications on specific details regarding the vehicle. @TobinMotorWorks inquired about the inclusion of a rear cargo cover, which @BDAS confirmed could be bought for a reasonable price. @pawel2 requested pictures of the rear rotors, and @mwebbsc pointed out potential discrepancies in the service records relative to mileage, prompting @BDAS to explain that the services were performed based on the vehicle’s age rather than its actual mileage. The seller’s responses generally maintained a neutral tone, addressing inquiries without raising or lowering the perception of the vehicle’s value.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the vehicle. @pawel2 expressed apprehension about the condition of the rear rotors, questioning their pitting despite the overall service history. Additionally, @mwebbsc noted the discrepancies in service history which might lead to questions about the vehicle’s maintenance records. The seller, @BDAS, addressed these concerns directly but did acknowledge that the rear rotors might not be new, which could lead to further scrutiny from potential buyers regarding the vehicle’s overall reliability.
|