Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the beauty and desirability of the 2002 Turbo, with @boaboyoz describing it as 'magnifique' and @Jimmyblues1959 sharing their admiration while highlighting their own scaled-down version. Enthusiasts such as @mef0629 and @e9er expressed excitement about the car's aesthetic appeal, while the seller, @HeritageGruppe, detailed its well-maintained condition, inviting potential buyers to inquire further. Notably, the car's performance, particularly the dogleg 5-speed transmission, drew praise, with @Lengrep commenting on its suitability for modern driving. Overall, the sentiment around the car is overwhelmingly positive, with many recognizing it as a classic collector's item.
Neutral: Several comments provided factual information related to the 2002 Turbo, such as @Riley640's note on the limited production of Polaris silver models, while @BR_549 inquired about the car's matching numbers. @Luki offered assistance by mentioning spare parts and @2mAn expressed anticipation for the forthcoming videos about the vehicle. Additionally, @bayarea2002driver raised points about potential imperfections but acknowledged that any shortcomings could be fixed, suggesting a balanced view of the car's condition. This segment of comments primarily reflects a mixture of technical discussion and expressions of interest from prospective buyers.
Negative: Despite the overall enthusiasm, some comments expressed skepticism or raised concerns. @mrdiva's comment was flagged as non-constructive, indicating potential criticisms not captured in detail. @bayarea2002driver suggested that the car might have 'rookie build attributes' that could impact its perceived value as a collector's item. Furthermore, @Persona-Non-Grata questioned aspects of the restoration that could indicate inconsistencies. Overall, while there are some apprehensions regarding the vehicle's condition and authenticity, they remain overshadowed by the excitement surrounding this iconic car.
 |
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the unique engineering and performance of the Panoz AIV Roadster. @WesDuenkel appreciates the modification options, marking a 'muffler delete' as an ideal enhancement. @Button marvels at how the V8 engine is fitted into the compact design, while @Revrider highlights the car's potential as an exhilarating replacement for a lost classic like the Lotus 7. Additionally, @Definitive_Motorwerk vouches for the seller's credibility, praising the quality of previous offerings from Switchcars and wishing bidders good luck. @Serviceguru also relays fond memories of ownership, citing the car's fun factor and engaging social experiences.
Neutral: Several comments discuss specifics regarding the car's features and past modifications without significant enthusiasm or disparagement. @TedLitvin raises questions about the practicality of A/C in an open vehicle, while @shyduke inquires about the top frame and A/C functionality. @Munkworks seeks clarity regarding modifications to the exhaust system. The seller, switchcars, routinely responds to inquiries, assuring potential buyers of the car's well-maintained condition, with a recent inspection confirming the A/C's efficiency and the absence of major leaks. He also describes the quirks of the AIV Roadster that come with its driving experience, linking its performance to design.
Negative: Some commenters voice concerns and skepticism regarding certain aspects of the car. @TedLitvin and @shyduke express doubt about the A/C system's efficiency in an open car and the absence of the original top frame, respectively. @Munkworks raises a question regarding potential modifications that might affect the car's sound and emissions compliance. Moreover, while the seller reassures bidders about the vehicle's condition, the acknowledgment of inherent vehicle noises and potential issues like squeaks could deter some buyers. The lack of a tool kit noted by @CaptMorgan might also be viewed as a minor downside by those valuing complete sets in such purchases.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @Barryward stating that it is a "fine skyline" and @Jrchristopher1 adding it is "very nice". @boaboyoz appreciated its aesthetic qualities, calling it a "wonderful white R32" and wishing the seller good luck with the auction. The seller, @mclovin92, highlighted that the car is mechanically and cosmetically excellent, noting that he had driven it 600 miles without issues after its arrival in the U.S. This suggests that the car is well-maintained and likely to appeal to potential buyers looking for a reliable performance vehicle.
Neutral: A number of questions were raised regarding the condition and features of the GT-R. @ZPOCRDY inquired about a mileage discrepancy, to which @mclovin92 clarified that it pertains to information gleaned during the auction process. @whdan600 asked about the functioning of the AC and audio systems, with the seller confirming the AC works well but the radio needs speakers. Questions were also posed about repairs done on the vehicle, with @BenTX and @Driftking777 specifically asking about visible damages from repairs and corrosion. The seller deftly addressed these with reasonable confidence about the repairs undertaken and the vehicle's overall condition.
Negative: There were concerns raised about the car’s running quality, particularly from @whdan600, who noted roughness in a startup video and speculated about possible misfires. Although @mclovin92 responded that he had no issues with misfiring, the doubt raised by commenters like @Joswar01 about the quality of provided footage was noticeable, particularly with remarks on the short length of driving videos. This could imply that potential buyers might feel uncertain about the vehicle's performance under various conditions, especially without concrete evidence of its capabilities.
|
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is praised for its striking color combination and overall aesthetics, with @Craven highlighting the "bloody well right" cardinal red interior that stands out with the exterior paint. @JGraham mentions that it is a great-looking E30 coupe with the right upgrades, indicating that it's ready for someone to drive across the country. Additionally, @Rbutler33 shares fond memories of a similar car, expressing recognition of how special and valuable this particular model is, while also feeding into the sense of community around its history and care, echoed by @bfast, who recalls his positive experiences with the builder Pete McHenry's work.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around practical inquiries about the vehicle's features and history. @smithdj2626 notes the disparity between auction prices, indicating a curiosity about the vehicle's valuation. @platelets and @Rusty635 ask for more detailed information regarding the stereo system and air conditioning components, indicating a careful consideration by potential buyers who may prioritize these aspects. @mxbz88 (The Seller) provides clarifications regarding these queries, revealing the car's evolution towards a track-focused build which resulted in the removal of certain comfort features. These exchanges reflect a balanced mix of admiration tempered with practical considerations.
Negative: Despite the enthusiasm, there are some negative comments regarding the vehicle's specifications. @bwy5000 explicitly challenges the claims of the car being a stroker motor, suggesting that it may simply be a rebuild rather than a substantial upgrade. This sentiment is supported by technical skepticism regarding engine modifications, leading to a heated debate about the legitimacy of the build. Meanwhile, @platelets points out a potential "rough idle" issue when starting, indicating that there might be concerns about the vehicle's performance when cold. Such conversations highlight underlying apprehensions about the vehicle's overall reliability and the veracity of its claimed enhancements.
|
|
 |
Positive: There are several positive comments about the vehicle highlighting its reliability and overall quality. @Gatlin1957 recalls a solid performance from the bike he bought new in 1978, emphasizing its durability. @68C10292 shares a nostalgic experience, mentioning how his bike would start easily and maintain a stable idle, indicating a solid power curve that made it easy to ride. The physical aspects of the bike, particularly the horizontal shock design, have also drawn admiration for being unique and a signature of Yamaha during that era. In addition, @rofandofy notes the historic value of vintage 2 stroke enduros, reflecting a positive economic trend for such bikes.
Neutral: The conversation has several neutral insights, especially regarding available parts and features of the bike. @motorcycleED (The Seller) mentions that while the passenger foot pegs are missing, they are commonly available online, which indicates that maintaining the bike could be manageable. Many comments also reference the condition and features of the bike without strong emotions—@Tom_S. points out that he sold a similar bike five years ago and appreciates the presence of well-maintained examples. Other commenters like @V8_LVR inquire about potential commuting concerns, demonstrating a practical approach to discussing the bike's functionality and safety.
Negative: On the negative side, there are concerns raised about the design of the passenger foot pegs. @68C10292 criticizes their placement, stating that the pegs are on the swingarm, which could create dangerous handling issues for passengers. This criticism is significant as it highlights a design flaw that could affect safety and comfort. Additionally, @motorcycleED (The Seller) acknowledges the lack of passenger pegs, indicating that even though they are a desired accessory, their absence is a drawback in the bike's current state.
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters like @euclid3336 and @Acorn19 praised the vehicle's color and aesthetics, showing appreciation for its overall attractiveness. @MattR1032 acknowledged the honest representation of the car in the videos shared by the seller, commending @Drager54 for narrating its imperfections while emphasizing the car's charming features. @mlesko73 expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance despite its known flaws, noting the appeal of its color scheme and the effort put into its presentation.
Neutral: Several commenters provided insights and information about the car's specifications, like @RDWAutomotive, who highlighted the uniqueness of the Canadian transmission code. @Drager54 (The Seller) discussed the car's history and specifications, reassuring potential buyers about its drivability and maintenance. @millenial appreciated the detailed overview of potential issues with older cars and engaged in a Q&A about maintenance advice, which furthered the conversation about the vehicle's upkeep.
Negative: Comments did highlight concerns regarding the vehicle's structural integrity, particularly from @2hipsi, who pointed out poor quality repairs and the need for better restoration techniques in metalwork. @FKurick expressed disappointment over its color change from the original Rangoon Red, noting that it detracts from the car's historical value. Additionally, @66RBS discussed inconsistencies in the car's speedometer and interior features, indicating it may have undergone modifications that could impact its authenticity.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Eunruh loves the originality of the TA and appreciates that it still has its AC and smog/air pump, showing enthusiasm for its functionality. @Barryward emphasizes the vehicle's desirability, stating it would be absurd not to bid on the Firebird, indicating a strong positive regard for the car. @2002WS6 shares a personal connection by owning a similar 1981 NASCAR edition pace car, praising the hardtop design over T-tops, reflecting fondness for the vehicle's features. @Justification expresses nostalgia, recalling how their first car was a 79 formula and noting that the Firebird looks faster than it is, highlighting a sense of admiration for the car's appearance.
Neutral: Both @Tomtesta2 (The Seller) and @Sniper discuss the car's performance with a focus on practicality rather than enhancement. The seller mentions that the car appears all original, with the AC potentially needing a charge and the original carburetor parts available if desired. Although the sniper carb provides reliability, @Tomtesta2 notes that there isn't a significant performance boost compared to the original setup. @Heidelberger humorously offers assistance in reconstructing a cigarette burn vignette on the rear seat, adding a lighthearted touch to the conversation.
Negative: @Eunruh questions if there are any significant mechanical replacements or issues, showing concern about potential undisclosed defects in the vehicle's history. Although they initially expressed excitement, there’s an implied need for reassurance about the condition of the original exhaust and possible noise issues, further complicating the vehicle's appeal. This concern reflects a hesitance around the vehicle's maintenance and any underlying problems that may not be immediately apparent.
|
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle receives high praise for its striking appearance, particularly the unique color combination of Pearl Gray metallic paint with a Medium Red leather interior. Commentors like @Asleferund20 highlight how the interior color pops against the exterior, while @Collectibleclassics emphasizes the immaculate condition of the car, noting that it features all-original paint and is considered a collector-grade vehicle. Additionally, the seller describes the car’s undercarriage as immaculate and confirms that the upholstery and wood trim are in exceptional shape, contributing to a very clean and well-cared-for aesthetic.
Neutral: The seller, represented by @Collectibleclassics, provides transparency regarding the vehicle’s ownership history, clarifying that there have been four prior owners, as indicated by the Carfax report. They mention possible discrepancies in records due to title changes, but still emphasize the car's integrity and condition. Commentors also inquire about repair histories; although the seller lacks comprehensive records, they reassure that recent maintenance has been performed, such as oil changes and repairs related to the windows and air conditioning, which the previous owners diligently maintained.
Negative: There were some concerns raised by potential buyers, such as @Exeter, questioning the number of previous owners and the integrity of the Carfax report. While @Collectibleclassics assures that the dash has no cracks or repairs, they acknowledge the lack of comprehensive service records, which many buyers typically desire for peace of mind. Additionally, @Allhart88's request for recent maintenance records highlighted a common apprehension about older vehicles, suggesting that not having a complete maintenance history might deter some purchasers.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Assam expresses confidence in the condition of the vehicle, suggesting that it is dry and possibly in good shape. @Salmineo, the seller, confirms that the vehicle’s fuel gauge works and provides information about the functionality of other gauges and switches. He reassures potential buyers about handling, indicating that he has only driven it up to 70 mph without issues, which can be viewed positively by potential buyers.
Neutral: @TbSamurai raises a question about the vehicle being registered out-of-state, which may lead some to wonder about its status and history. @rustyray also asks a technical question regarding the effect of installed 4" shackles on the vehicle's handling and alignment, which indicates that he's seeking more information without making a definitive judgment about the vehicle's condition. @Salmineo responds to these inquiries, suggesting he has dual residency and explaining his understanding of the vehicle's modifications and historical registration.
Negative: @mef0629 critiques the diamond plates attached to the vehicle, suggesting they are hiding significant issues ('cancer') which raises concerns about potential rust or structural problems. This comment reflects a negative view of the vehicle’s current condition, and the implication that the seller is not disclosing important information could deter some buyers. Overall, the concerns around the plate registration and technical handling issues also contribute to hesitations from potential buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a lot of enthusiastic comments from potential buyers and admirers. @Barryward expressed a strong desire to drive the M3, indicating a high level of interest and excitement. Additionally, @ChamplainMotorcyclist praised the car's color, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. Overall, the seller, @enthusiastic_enthusiast, has fostered a positive environment by inviting engagement and expressing gratitude to the community for their interest.
Neutral: The seller has actively addressed inquiries from interested buyers, providing clear and informative responses. When @LG1971gSX inquired about the steering wheel, @enthusiastic_enthusiast explained that it is an aftermarket piece made by AAcars in Europe, while also confirming that the original steering wheel is included in the sale. This level of transparency helps maintain a neutral stance, ensuring that all prospective buyers have the necessary information before making a decision.
Negative: While the comments have been largely positive, there are some concerns raised, particularly about the vehicle's condition. @ChamplainMotorcyclist questioned the underbody panel's wear, suggesting potential prior damage, although @enthusiastic_enthusiast clarified that it was a minor issue related to a loose fastener. Despite this minor hiccup, the seller's promptness in addressing concerns helps mitigate negative perceptions.
|
|
 |
Positive: @90sundevil expressed a friendly sentiment about the vehicle's return, wishing the seller good luck in the selling process. Their comment reflects a positive community response, highlighting a sense of support for the seller's efforts.
Neutral: @marcusirwin (The Seller) provided transparent responses to inquiries about the vehicle's IMS bearing and bore scoring. While @sag2 asked about the IMS bearing replacement, and @jatt007 inquired about diagnostics on bore scoring, the seller confirmed that the IMS bearing has not been replaced and stated that there is no diagnostic available for bore scoring. Additionally, @Jgfuller75 sought clarification about a referenced crack in the vehicle, indicating a need for further information or visual evidence.
Negative: @Hogheadbob mentioned a concerning detail regarding a 1-inch crack on #38, which indicates potential issues with the vehicle's condition. This comment raises alarms for prospective buyers about the structural integrity of the vehicle. Overall, the comments suggest scrutiny towards the car's mechanical aspects, particularly regarding the IMS bearing and the newly mentioned crack.
|
|
 |
Positive: @gkirk79 (The Seller) described the 1997 Lexus LX 450 as a clean, well-maintained vehicle that offers a smooth driving experience. The seller expressed enthusiasm for the classic model and encouraged potential buyers not to miss the opportunity to own it. They also provided detailed information and offered assistance for any questions from interested parties, demonstrating a commitment to customer service.
Neutral: Commenters asked various questions regarding the condition of the vehicle, including the amount of clay versus crust underneath and the severity of rust present. @TheChloeBear expressed hesitation in bidding higher without additional photos, particularly of the underside, while @jblizock inquired about the vehicle's care and storage over the last five years, noting minimal mileage. Concerns about the air suspension and oil light were raised, with @gkirk79 addressing the oil light issue, stating there are no significant problems according to the gauges.
Negative: Concerns about rust were prominent, with commenters like @Andrewd95 and @BPOTBAM specifically highlighting difficulties in assessing rust severity and questioning the presence of holes, particularly in the muffler. @ALittrell noted loose red wires visible in certain pictures and sought clarification on their purpose, hinting at possible issues needing resolution. Additionally, questions about the functionality of the air conditioning and heating systems suggested apprehensions about the overall condition of the vehicle.
|
|
 |
Positive: Comments reflect a strong admiration for the vehicle, especially its unique Willow Green color. @scliffe notes the auction's extensive photography as a positive aspect, while @dexandsqueak shares their love for the color. @XK140cat also highlights the significance of Willow Green by mentioning that it was Sir William Lyons' favorite E-Type color. Several commenters emphasize the charm and character of the car, regarding it as a delightful driver despite its age, with @Five_Older_Jags saying it's a wonderful car for DIY enthusiasts. Overall, the vehicle garners a lot of enthusiasm, with @enthusiastic_enthusiast (The Seller) expressing excitement about the auction and the car's features.
Neutral: There are balanced views regarding the car's condition and auction setup. @mspohn asks if any work has been done since previous listings and expresses interest in the car's structural integrity, indicating a cautious approach to the purchase. @Rdavis echoes these concerns by inquiring about potential rust issues and the floor pan's condition, which could affect the car's structural soundness. In terms of design, color is acknowledged as subjective; @jagster911 recalls a 'faded green' but acknowledges that once behind the wheel, aesthetics may not matter as much. The comments suggest a need for potential buyers to inspect the car personally before making a decision.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition dominate some comments, particularly regarding possible rust issues and the integrity of the floor pans. @mspohn points out that no significant work seems to have been done since previous listings, which raises red flags for potential buyers. @Rdavis articulates worries about structural soundness, suggesting extensive floor rot. Additionally, @MrPeabody discusses a lack of seals around the boot hatch and identifies potential camera issues in the auction photos that could mislead about the vehicle's paint condition. Such negative remarks indicate that while some see beauty and potential in the car, others are apprehensive about significant underlying issues that could impact ownership.
|
|
1994 Ford F-350 XLT Centurion Pacifica Crew Cab Turbodiesel Dually
1FTJW35K6REA12698
Lot 206202
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Safd2714 (The Seller) has mentioned that the original air intake and radio will be included with the truck, offering further transparency by inviting potential buyers to request specific photos or videos. This shows a willingness to assist customers and provide comprehensive information about the vehicle, which is a positive aspect for interested buyers.
Neutral: Comments from @DrJacquesStrappe introduce a light-hearted reference to the truck culture, quoting a famous song related to trucking. This adds a bit of personality to the discussion about the vehicle, indicating that while the truck may attract attention for its nostalgic value, it does not provide much technical insight or assessment.
Negative: However, there are critical notes from @BraydenWebber and @Ifixjohndeeres who pointed out that the truck is actually an IDI and not a Powerstroke as mentioned in the title. These comments indicate a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the vehicle's specifications, which could be a significant concern for potential buyers who are looking specifically for a Powerstroke diesel. @Safd2714 (The Seller) acknowledged this mistake, stating that he will request the title to be corrected, indicating a lack of initial clarity that could deter prospective customers.
|
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg expresses excitement over the vehicle, noting that it has only been driven 100 miles in the last two years, and welcomes back the 'Guards Red beauty' with well wishes. @dday930 comments on wanting to see how the market adjusts in two years, appreciating the vehicle's great condition. @dillon410021 admires the vehicle as a beautiful example, highlighting the as-new condition of the finishes and undercarriage, suggesting it aligns well with its intended aesthetics.
Neutral: @court314 raises questions about the service records and history of the vehicle, seeking clarity about the documentation and maintenance specifics. @CountryDriver appreciates additional images of the dashboard, noting minor blemishes and asking for clarifications on paint meter readings and a Velcro strip observed earlier. @kmikachu shares detailed technical concerns, indicating that while the car looks spectacular, proper documentation is crucial for potential investment considerations, allowing for a more informed judgment on its value.
Negative: @hivetyrant believes the car deserves a proper photo shoot to showcase it better, while @MGB6 expresses skepticism about the mileage claim based on the undercarriage condition. @0die labels it as the "most unloved 951 in the world," emphasizing its lack of usage over the years. @jmsmilin refers to past coverage of the vehicle, suggesting that the current asking price may constitute a loss for the prospective buyer.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express a strong appreciation for the 1996 Ford Bronco, with @CobraVic11 noting that it stands out in the rust belt as a "diamond in the rough." @Hairball mentions that it is a nice example despite some modifications, while @DrJacquesStrappe admires its look and functionality, especially with the working vent windows. @FW_BRONC loves the enhanced driving experience without the AC, appreciating the Bronco's design and capabilities.
Neutral: Some comments provide clarifications or inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition and features. @MontanaBroncos brings up the historical context of the Bronco related to O.J. Simpson, while @jsloden raises questions about the compatibility of the roll bar with the topper. @tstaver (The Seller) responds to these inquiries, confirming that both tops are included and addressing concerns about the fit and functionality of the vehicle. Overall, the discussion is informative and centers around understanding the Bronco's features better.
Negative: There are a few critiques regarding the vehicle's cosmetic issues. @Wildland351 questions why the bumpers weren't replaced instead of painted, emphasizing that the appearance could be significantly improved. Additionally, @Hairball mentions the concern over button snaps drilled into the body, which required professional repair work. While the comments reflect a general enthusiasm for the Bronco, these critiques indicate that there are areas where the vehicle could be enhanced for a better presentation.
|
|
 |
Positive: @wilshults has emphasized the extensive investment, hard work, and careful restoration of the Blazer, showcasing receipts totaling over $50k. The vehicle has remained rust-free as it spent its entire life in California and has been well-prepared with a recent paint correction and ceramic coating that enhances its appearance. Many features of the Blazer, such as the functioning A/C, lights, and buttons, have been highlighted to indicate its good condition.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @msdezign and @Cade002, have acknowledged the quality of restoration and upgrades made to the vehicle, suggesting it is well-documented and appealing for auction. The seller has been responsive, offering to provide additional pictures and arrange for in-person viewing. Questions about specifics, like suspension upgrades and the condition of the tailgate, have been answered positively with evidence to support the seller's claims.
Negative: However, some concerns have been raised by @JakeTheSnake115 regarding the quality of the auction photos, and @Jimmy_21 pointed out potential surface rust that might not be fully visible in the photos. @Cade002 also inquired about the original condition of the doors and any engine modifications. @wilshults addressed these concerns, clarifying that the vehicle had no rust repair and that any wear on the driver door paint was noted.
|
|
 |
Positive: Comments from enthusiasts about the vehicle highlight its beauty and nostalgic value. @MTCEEGEE refers to the Firebird as 'beautiful,' and @67tbirdlover praises its aesthetics compared to the Camaro, suggesting it possesses a more refined look. @boaboyoz describes it as a 'delightful example,' and @classy63chassis admires its upscale trim components. The seller, @enthusiastic_enthusiast, expressed excitement over hosting the auction for this 'great vehicle with a smile filled future ahead of it,' emphasizing its quality and reliability based on its history as a California car with no known rust repairs.
Neutral: Neutral comments focus on inquiries about the vehicle's condition and history. @jprobisheaux raises questions regarding previous rust repairs and the state of various components, while @gscm75 asks about the removal of the A/C and the rear-end leak. @911s55 points out a bit of terminology confusion in the presentation of a video related to the vehicle's transmission, leading to a clarification by the seller. Additionally, various users express curiosity regarding the originality of certain parts and corrections regarding details in the video presentation, showing a keen interest in ensuring accurate information is shared.
Negative: Critical comments point out concerns about missing components and modifications. @jstreets1946 and @1969hurstolds note that the removal of the A/C seems poorly explained and mention issues with the vehicle's fan and radio not functioning properly. @pontiacnut criticizes the condition of the headliner, stressing the importance of such details for prospective buyers. Additionally, @gscm75 mentions potential issues with the suspension components and the lightness of the rear end for a V8 400 car, raising questions about its authenticity and performance.
|
|
 |
Positive: The general consensus among commenters is that the Westfalia vehicle is exceptionally clean and well-sorted. @911r (The Seller) highlights that it is powered by a fresh VW Gen V inline 4 engine, which several commenters, including @argon3030 and @sppbcski, affirm as more reliable and serviceable than alternatives. The upgrades, such as the FAS conversion, make it highly desirable, with @CKKurtz appreciating the choice of German Racing Silver paint as a perfect match for a German vehicle. Several commenters express excitement about the vehicle’s capabilities for road trips, being outfitted for comfort and featuring new tires, excellent AC, and a functional pop-top.
Neutral: Several questions from commenters focus on specific features and performance capabilities. @teledriver asks for additional photos of the electrical system, while @jpr requests insights on comparisons between the VW engine and Subaru options. @liamlrb questions the timeline of the Gen V engine, citing confusion over its release year. @PhilCarter and @Tomrichert raise concerns about California smog compliance, with @911r confirming that while emissions equipment is installed, it may not meet California's strict standards, which could complicate registration. Questions about the tent's installation also arise, with some suggesting there might be issues due to incorrect zippers and seams.
Negative: Comments expressing concern revolve primarily around the vehicle's compliance with California's smog regulations and installation mistakes related to the pop-top tent. @Yipandyow, @Tomrichert, and @ACKitude highlight the potential difficulties of registering the vehicle in California without the proper smog certification and suggest that the tent may have been incorrectly installed, which could lead to water leakage during rainy conditions. The response to these issues indicates a need for transparency regarding the vehicle's initial setup and any potential additional costs that a buyer might incur to rectify these problems, as indicated by concerns from @eddyalzpr and @Tomrichert about the functional aspects of the van.
|
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz: BaT's Bel Airapalooza continues with this fine filly, a lovely sight in blue and white over white – GLWTA! @39mercman: I love the upholstery, it’s bitchen!! @Al_Swearengen: Nice ride…even with a laundry list of things needing fixed. @Ghosty: The color scheme is gorgeous! But that 4spd stick is what really puts it over the top for me. @rlr3rd (The Seller): I’ll be here throughout the auction and will answer any questions the best I can. Thanks Al. It really is a fantastic car that looks great on the inside and out. It runs smooth and the exhaust note is dead on.
Neutral: @tim49: Can you tell us where the battery is located, I can see a disconnect switch? Also appears to have windshield wiper delete as no motor or arms. @Gpz: Add says 4 link but it has leaf springs and slapper bars. @tstitzel: Can you get closer on the nicks and scratches in the listing? Also, any issues with the seats? @RevGuy: Looks great! How’s it go on the highway? I’m in So Oregon. Driving on I 5 almost everywhere I go 70-75mph… love the ball valve on the heater hose!
Negative: @Al_Swearengen: Why does it seem like all the good stuff is located on either coast and rarely seen in the no-coast states? @2001lightning: Do you have any of the emblems that came from the factory for this beautiful ’56? Thanks for your response… @rlr3rd (The Seller): I do not have the original emblems for the car. 🙁 @donaldrave: Where is the gas cap? @68CamaroSS396L78: I don’t see any reference to a four link suspension or a correction posted by BaT.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Fountain38 praised the truck's appearance, describing it as a good looking vehicle, while @boaboyoz referred to it as a wonderful example of a F-250 and wished the seller good luck with the auction. @JimW60 concurred with @carstruck, complimenting the truck and acknowledging the seller's craftsmanship. @DSibert (The Seller) also noted the labor of love put into the truck's build and expressed well wishes to potential bidders.
Neutral: @isleofdan raised questions regarding the functionality of the AC and the fuel tanks, seeking clarification on the vehicle's features. @carstruck provided detailed insights into the truck's construction, noting the differences in the bed type and potential modifications, as well as the placement of fuel tanks. @DSibert (The Seller) confirmed the status of the AC and further elaborated on the truck's history, detailing its transition from a neighbor's build to a new father-son project.
Negative: However, there were concerns as well; @1937labatts pointed out a potential chip in the windshield that required confirmation. @DSibert (The Seller) confirmed the chip and mentioned a scheduled repair while expressing regret that, after completion, the chip would still be faintly visible. Additionally, @carstruck commented on the box not being a highboy box, highlighting possible confusion at car shows regarding its authenticity.
|
|
 |
Positive: @FirehouseVintage (The Seller) proudly introduces a highly well-optioned 2013 Cayenne Turbo, highlighting its immaculate condition both inside and out, akin to a showroom model. The car features appealing options like adaptive cruise control, heated and cooled seats, and a rare Burmester sound system, making it an attractive choice for prospective buyers. Additionally, comments from @GDogg express admiration for the car's appearance, while @Jjbuns inquires about the keys and functions, receiving reassurance from the seller that everything is in working order.
Neutral: Several inquiries reveal potential buyers are seeking more information to ensure the Cayenne's quality. @dontiveros asks about the natural leather option and its differences from standard leather, showing a keen interest in the materials used. @Tdub9966 requests photos of the display, specifically with the ignition on, while @911heaven48 questions documentation regarding the transfer case and if the vehicle handbook is present; both questions showcase a focused interest in understanding the finer details that contribute to the vehicle's integrity.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's history surface with questions about any reported accidents or damage, such as those posed by @steviewondersdriver and @avasu01, who seek specifics on past bodywork and color mismatches. @911heaven48's inquiry related to potential updates on the transfer case highlights apprehension regarding mechanical issues, although @FirehouseVintage (The Seller) ensures there are no concerns regarding frame or undercarriage damage. Overall, while many comments center around potential issues, @FirehouseVintage addresses each concern directly, maintaining transparency about the vehicle's condition.
|
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the vehicle as a "killer Cape Coral Bronco" and complimented it on being a beautiful build. Additionally, @sportfishtrader (The Seller) noted that there are almost 400 watchers for the Bronco, indicating strong interest in the vehicle, and expressed willingness to answer any questions from potential buyers.
Neutral: @INeedThisCar requested details about the functionality of the gauges and lights, specifically inquiring if the speedometer and fuel level indicators report accurately from both tanks. @jhixson also asked for clarification on picture 154, indicating that it was difficult to interpret what the image showed. In response, @sportfishtrader (The Seller) explained what photo 154 represents, highlighting that it shows the location of the VIN frame stamp, which is obscured.
Negative: @sportfishtrader (The Seller) mentioned that while all lights and fuel gauges are operational, the speedometer had stopped working prior to the vehicle being stored a couple of years ago. This issue could be a concern for potential buyers looking for a fully functional vehicle.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the attractiveness of the Ducati Multistrada V4 S, with @Spinnacak describing it as a "great looking bike" and @Lovethatnewcarsmell adding a personal affirmation, calling it a "sweet bike." The seller (@nweuro) emphasizes the bike's excellent condition, stating it has only 691 miles, and has never been down or parked outside overnight, making it a great option for potential buyers. Comments from other users like @zeos2 and @WLACA underscore the bike's impressive performance, particularly after modifications such as the racing exhaust, which enhances engine mapping and reduces weight.
Neutral: Several users provided clarifications on technical details, such as @themis3062 who noted the discrepancy in wheel sizes, prompting the seller to correct the listing. Questions regarding service history and modifications emerged, with @Lovethatnewcarsmell asking if a "race tune" was installed, and @zeos2 discussing the implications of the exhaust change on performance and service indicators. The seller responded that they do not have complete service records, particularly regarding the timing of the first service, indicating that it may need attention before the bike is put into use.
Negative: The lack of confirmation on whether the first service was completed raised concerns among several commenters, including @gmh11ri and @zeos2, who questioned if the factory service indicator was addressed. @Teameric's inquiry about the impact of exhaust modifications on registration in California also highlighted uncertainties regarding compliance with state regulations. Additionally, @Huckleberries brought up potential issues related to registration loopholes in California, raising further doubts among potential buyers about the risks associated with the modifications.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Joshuarubbo expresses admiration for the vehicle, noting that a lot of work has been put into it. Meanwhile, @cleinberry (The Seller) responds positively to requests by providing three videos demonstrating the car's functionality, including footage of it starting from a cold state and driving, which showcases the vehicle's condition and capabilities.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's state vary, with @spenny noting concerns based on the appearance of the tuffy box and frame photos. @Bowtie_defender mentions that the truck looks like it needs love, which is what he would expect from a vehicle that is 42 years old, linking it to his own restoration journey with an older vehicle. Overall, there is an acknowledgment of the vehicle's age and the work that has been put into it, suggesting it has potential.
Negative: On the negative side, @GOIN4XN advises that the interior should be detailed, hinting at a lack of cleanliness. Additionally, @Holbk99 makes a somewhat humorous but concerning remark that the winning bidder should ensure their tetanus vaccine is up to date, implying significant neglect or poor condition. These comments suggest that while the vehicle has potential, it also requires considerable attention and care.
|
|
One-Owner 2008 Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet 6-Speed
Slate Gray Metallic Paint
Lot 206216
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters were enthusiastic about the vehicle, with @alfriedesq describing it as stunning and @Justinly87 praising the great spec and color, wishing the seller good luck with the sale (GLWS). @MrBCut simply said it's perfect, while @Usd97 referred to it as a cream puff, indicating a high quality. @Carbine123 also lauded the listing as another great one from the seller, and @LaserGuru1948 remarked on the car being a mean machine, further boosting its appeal.
Neutral: Comments from @GenauAutoWerks, the seller, provided essential details about the car's condition and history. They highlighted that this one-owner, low-mileage manual 997.1 Turbo Cab in Slate Gray has been well maintained, undergoing significant updates like a Dynavin 8 unit for modern usability. The seller also addressed inquiries about the vehicle's soft top and rear window condition, confirming they were in great shape. They documented the car's incident history transparently, providing evidence of repairs made with OEM parts and assuring potential buyers about the vehicle's mechanical soundness.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle's past damage. @1Kettel questioned whether there was any structural damage caused by the valet that had harmed the car, though the seller clarified that all replaced parts were non-structural. Other users like @1Kettel warned that cars need to be driven to stay in good shape, reflecting a concern for the car's value if it were to sit idle. Overall, while there were no significant negative comments, the mention of the valet incident and inquiries about the vehicle's condition indicated a need for transparency in its history.
|
|
 |
Positive: @BDAS (The Seller) highlights that the 2020 Range Rover HSE Diesel is in excellent condition, boasting only 44,171 miles with a creamy Yulong White Metallic exterior and an elegant Ivory/Expresso interior. The seller mentions personal experience, stating that after driving 300 miles, the vehicle feels like new, and it also features desirable upgrades such as Diamond-Turned 22" Wheels, a Meridian Surround-Sound System, and a Drive Pro Package that includes adaptive cruise control and other advanced features. Several commentators express their admiration for the vehicle's clean condition and upgraded features, with @KarlC specifically noting it as a nice example.
Neutral: Commenters have posed several questions regarding the vehicle's features and specifications, such as whether it has a hitch receiver, CarPlay compatibility, and details about adaptive cruise control. @BDAS (The Seller) provides thorough responses, confirming that the vehicle does not come with a factory hitch but can be added, and that it is equipped with wireless CarPlay. Additionally, the seller confirms that the exhaust system has no issues and the last service was done recently, addressing concerns raised by @Cotmar and others. @jeepdj inquires about the ride quality and noise level with the BFG tires, receiving feedback that the ride is actually improved with the new tires.
Negative: While most comments are positive or neutral, there are concerns about the availability of a second key, as @Modykaran points out and @BDAS (The Seller) later confirms that they are unable to find an extra key and mentions the potential cost of $500 for a replacement fob. This may be a downside for potential buyers who may prioritize having multiple keys for convenience. Additionally, the absence of a detailed factory window sticker may leave some prospective buyers wanting more information about the vehicle's original specifications.
|
|
 |
Positive: @DoctrAMG praised the vehicle with excitement, calling it "nice!" and @soldbydon described it as "a nice example" while emphasizing the quality of the build and comfort of the car. @fallingdown4u echoed positive sentiments, stating that these cars are "greatly underrated" and highlighted their reliable performance and solid engineering. The Seller, @Braddd, supported these opinions by noting the car's classic features, low maintenance needs, and the enjoyment of driving a V8 Mercedes-Benz. He also provided reassurances regarding the car's status and the lack of need for significant repairs, making an appealing case for potential buyers.
Neutral: @meg288234 inquired if the rear window is glass or plastic, which @Braddd confirmed as glass. The Seller also acknowledged that there was an issue with some of the car's pictures not uploading correctly and is working to resolve this. @Kukla took an interest in technical aspects, asking about potential oil drips and the condition of the motor mounts, indicating a need for clear communication of the car's mechanical status. @Braddd responded thoroughly to these questions, providing details about the car's maintenance records and assuring the viewer of the vehicle's well-maintained condition.
Negative: @Kukla pointed out a possible issue with the gear shift indicator, mentioning its notorious pixel problems. While highlighting his positive experience with a similar model, he expressed concern about potential mechanical issues by asking specific questions about oil leaks and the state of the motor mounts. Although @Braddd provided satisfactory answers about the mechanical condition, the mention of common issues suggests that some buyers might have reservations about the car's technology and reliability, given past experiences.
|
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and modifications. @Sage6058 called it a 'beautiful Jeep', and @MKS427 appreciated the LS engine and AC setup, describing it as a 'good looking CJ 7'. @MikeDTaz also praised the build, noting its appeal despite the absence of a supercharger, and commented on its strong performance capabilities. The seller, @DSeibel, acknowledged the compliments and engaged positively with other users, offering additional details about the vehicle's features.
Neutral: There were inquiries about specific features and specifications of the Jeep, reflecting curiosity without strong emotional tones. @cas123 noted the unusual placement of the transfer case shifter, which is located under the vehicle, while @Njsaltydog asked about the overall height, which @DSeibel confirmed to be around 76-77 inches. @1936fred inquired about the availability of hardtop doors, which led to @DSeibel clarifying that the vehicle comes with a soft top that is still boxed and that stock doors can fit without issues.
Negative: While many comments were positive, some expressed concerns about the practicality of the Jeep's features. @cas123 found the need to crawl under the Jeep to engage 4WD to be excessive, stating 'That is nuts.' There was also an implication that the modifications might not appeal to everyone, as @MKS427 expressed a desire for a manual transmission, suggesting a preference for more traditional driving features. Overall, there were hints that while the vehicle is visually appealing, its functionality could be questioned by some potential buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its impressive quality and status as an iconic automobile. @GenExcars notes that the car is likely to attract high bids even in a post-COVID market, celebrating the W140 as a result of decades of engineering. @michaelmotorcar emphasizes the car's low mileage (31,000) and showcases its excellent condition, stating that it runs perfectly and is visually stunning. @Dean_Laumbach praises the car for being exceptionally over-engineered and a benchmark for luxury cars, further appreciating its rarity and service history.
Neutral: Some comments address the car's features and condition, asking pointed questions that demonstrate an interest in the vehicle's specifications. @HealthcareOne inquires about the instrument cluster replacement, while @Lubedude1 questions whether the known wiring harness issues have been resolved. Others, like @Wgnman, express gratitude for the provided electric operation videos and request additional maintenance information. @Softal and @atbatacc discuss the odometer history and the legitimacy of its mileage, indicating curiosity about the vehicle’s past.
Negative: There are concerns raised regarding potential issues with the vehicle, including aesthetic details that need attention. @Wgnman and @clean_machina identify problems like the positioning of badges and the condition of the steering wheel, suggesting possible mishandling or repairs. Furthermore, @atbatacc highlights inconsistencies in the reported mileage from various sources, questioning the auction seller about these discrepancies, which could imply doubts about the vehicle's history. This mix of apprehensions reflects the collective caution of potential bidders.
|
|
 |
Positive: @aSingh39 shared that the R-Class vehicle is back for auction and noted its reliability, stating that it runs and drives excellently without any warnings or pending codes. The sunroof operates properly, and there are no issues with the rear shocks, which is a reassuring point given the potential concerns with this model.
Neutral: There was a previous attempt to sell the vehicle in July, but @Mike6613 reported that the sale was not finalized as the buyer did not come forward. @aSingh39 provided transparency about the auction process, inviting potential bidders to ask questions. The auction is set to last for another week, indicating ongoing interest.
Negative: @suprtran raised valid concerns about the vehicle's engine and suspension components, particularly highlighting known failure points for the Mercedes R-Class model. Questions were posed regarding the balance shaft, intake manifold swirl flaps, and engine thermostat, revealing potential issues that could affect the vehicle's long-term reliability. However, @aSingh39 responded to these concerns by assuring that the car does not fall within the problematic range for the balance shaft and has no issues related to the thermostat or intake manifold.
|
|
 |
Positive: @ejhansen05 excitedly kicked off the BaT auction, while @df404 expressed their enthusiasm, stating they could not love the vehicle more and wishing good luck. @DakotaSteve eagerly anticipated the unique sound of the vehicle with a cold start, referring to it as the 'Rocket Roar'. Additionally, @GParry and @scscarborough praised the vehicle, with the latter highlighting its greatness in terms of both performance and the good cause associated with it, supporting veterans. @bry593 also contributed positivity by expressing love for the vehicle's Triple feature, calling it a monster.
Neutral: @TerryLee2025 raised a practical question regarding the mid controls stated in the listing, inquiring if there's an option to change them to the forward position seen in other GT models. @MaxwellsDemon mentioned a personal preference for the original rear fender and license frame bracket, asking if it would be included if still available, which indicates curiosity about modifications and inclusions with the sale.
Negative:
|
|
 |
Positive: @mlee129 praises the vehicle, noting the outstanding condition of the car and the impressive aspect of the factory stock GY SC3R tires, which still have their stickers and tape. The comment reflects a positive expectation that the car should bring in a great price due to its excellent condition.
Neutral: @Bluemountaingarage (The Seller) clarifies the situation regarding the Goodyear supercar tires, explaining that they are the original tires that came with the vehicle when it was shipped from the factory. The seller also engages with potential buyers by welcoming questions and indicating their availability to communicate via comments or messages. They share their enthusiasm about the car and the beautiful setting in the Adirondack Park.
Negative: @Nchiles raises a concern regarding the trunk of the vehicle, asking if it will be detailed before the buyer receives it, as there appear to be significant stains on the carpeting. In response, @Bluemountaingarage (The Seller) mentions that they have not used the trunk, only opened it for battery maintenance, and promises to take a look at the condition in the morning.
|
|
 |
Positive: @alfriedesq describes the vehicle as a lovely machine, while @Alfisti27 appreciates its classy design, highlighting its significance as one of the limited edition models celebrating Ferrari's 60th anniversary. The seller mentions that the car has received proper maintenance and has a clean history, spending most of its life in dry climates. They emphasize that the interior layout is one of Ferrari's finest, balancing classic and modern elements, and express confidence in its condition, as confirmed by a master Ferrari technician.
Neutral: Several inquiries regard the condition and maintenance history of the vehicle. @2800cs_automatic and @mlnevius both ask about the treatment of the shrinking leather on the dashboard, while @clean_machina is concerned about previous overheating and fluid services. The seller responds to these queries, explaining the car's service record and providing insights into the cosmetic condition of the dash. They also clarify that the car comes with specific accessories such as a Tubi exhaust and mention that it does not feature the HGT packages, as confirmed in interactions with @commute2coffee.
Negative: Some comments express frustration with the seller's engagement and responsiveness. @lemondzurich notes that no questions were answered for hours after the listing went live, suggesting a lack of engagement expected from the seller. @firberger raises concerns regarding visible wear and discrepancies in paint readings, questioning previous maintenance and the presence of scuff marks. Overall, there seems to be skepticism regarding the seller's transparency in addressing the car's issues and history.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Euro_Classica presents the 2014 Panamera GTS as a well-maintained vehicle, highlighting its appealing features including the V8 engine, sports exhaust, Sport Chrono, and luxury amenities such as heated and ventilated seats and a Burmeister sound system. The seller asserts that major maintenance tasks have been completed, including the brakes, water pump, and valve cover gaskets. Additionally, a recent oil change has been performed, with future maintenance indicated by a sticker showing the next oil change is due at 93,000 miles.
Neutral: Commenters have expressed a mix of curiosity and skepticism regarding the car's history and condition. @AnyOldIron raises concerns about potential deferred maintenance since the vehicle has not received factory-level care since 2017, and @Caymanorcarrera seeks clarification on the maintenance timeline up to 90,000 miles. @Dlobi requests a cold start and driving video, while @ePoch01776MB asks for detailed explanations about the vehicle's paint and condition, indicating areas that might need attention without definitive conclusions.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the vehicle’s maintenance history and overall condition. @sbmaine questions the 10,000-mile oil change intervals and highlights vague service claims, expressing suspicion regarding its auction history and previous sales difficulties. Additionally, @ePoch01776MB points out inconsistencies in the seller's description of the paint condition and notes the potential for significant wear and tear, implying that the car may not have been thoroughly prepared for sale, leading to doubts about its presentation and maintenance.
|
|
 |
Positive: @ChrisCJC praised the truck's appearance, indicating it is a nice looking vehicle and inquired about its readiness for daily driving. @Skooterrider remarked that the truck 'ticks all the boxes,' suggesting overall satisfaction with its features. @Bodydust1117 asserted that the truck was ready for everyday use, having been daily driven last summer without any major issues, although there is a minor concern with the sunroof leaking under heavy rain.
Neutral: @Bodydust1117 responded with specifics about the truck’s features including the current gear ratio of 4.10, the reconditioning of the engine with a rebuild kit, and sound deadening in lieu of a headliner due to the sunroof. Various commentors, such as @Flooder and @Southsidewaterman, posed technical questions regarding the weatherstripping around the sunroof and request for video evidence of the truck's operation, showing an active interest in the vehicle's functionality.
Negative: @tlcamg dismissed a suggestion regarding the truck's cost, implying that it undervalued the vehicle's components. Inquiries from @PonderTexan about the engine rebuild documentation suggested a lack of sufficient information provided initially. @LBS1000 expressed confusion regarding the truck's lift, questioning its aesthetic versus functional purposes and whether it could create clearance issues.
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle's hardtop, considering it a valuable and rare feature. @58GSV asserts that the hardtop is a factory original and highlights its quality craftsmanship, including mentioning the beautifully stitched cloth headliner. @FruaCaravelle and @ForzaCarCompanyPA echo this sentiment, noting that the presence of a Pininfarina identification tag supports its authenticity. The rarity of factory hardtops is emphasized, and the overall effect of the car and its hardtop evokes fond memories from commenters like @Jimmyblues1959 who reminisces about a similar vehicle from his youth.
Neutral: Many comments engage in discussions about specific features of the hardtop and its construction, such as the distinction between factory-made steel tops and aftermarket options. @austin_alfa provides insight on the construction materials, suggesting that steel tops were more likely factory options, while @alfadoc offers additional context about the differences between various models of hardtops. @ForzaCarCompanyPA addresses multiple queries about the vehicle, including the hardtop's original manufacturer and the history of the car itself, indicating ongoing communication and interest in its provenance.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns regarding information transparency and the need for documentation. @carbonara specifically asks if there is verified documentation for the factory hardtop and its original color, reflecting a desire for confirmation before proceeding. @jeremynichols questions whether the master brake cylinder was upgraded, hinting at potential issues that need addressing. Additionally, @TrojanFan inquires about a confusing title from Pennsylvania, indicating possible administrative challenges associated with the vehicle.
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle, noting its coolness and unique character. @V8_LVR highlights the machine's coolness and the intrigue of its potential, while @JimDod describes it as a hot rod truck with historical significance and expresses curiosity about its functionality. @FirestationDan likens the car to a childhood Hot Wheels, suggesting enhancements to improve its appearance.
Neutral: Several users offer factual comments regarding the vehicle, such as its type, specifications, and operational queries. @40fordlover refers to it as a 'C cab', while @Rubberbandman discusses the engine and transmission condition. There are also questions posed about the car's electrical system and maintenance history by commenters like @Chuckinnj and @Hotrod541, indicating common concerns for vintage vehicles.
Negative: Some comments convey disappointment or skepticism regarding the vehicle's state. @oildrip criticizes the choice of wheels, suggesting they are subpar compared to the original look. @giddyup comments on the visible wear, implying uncertainty about the car's operational condition, alongside other users like @The_Relic who point out missing parts. Overall, there is a hint of concern over the car's lack of current functionality.
|
|
9k-Mile 1986 Ford F-350 Dually 4×4 7.5 4-Speed Brush Fire Truck
2FDKF38L9GCA77228
Lot 206250
Private Party
 |
Positive: The vehicle, a stunning 8700-mile ’86 F350 4×4 Brush Truck, has generated considerable interest and praise from various commentors. @CDehne complimented its overall aesthetic and noted the truck's low mileage and unique features, expressing curiosity about its configurations such as the absence of a winch and the tire tread for off-road capabilities. Additionally, @4spdBernie showcased the truck's impressive equipment, highlighting the Waterous PB18 gear driven high-pressure fire pump and its various functionalities, which have been positively received by fire service aficionados.
Neutral: Comments have sought clarification regarding various specifications of the truck. @CAJoel inquired about the capacity of the water storage tank, to which @4spdBernie responded with detailed information about the water pump and its capabilities. There were also questions about the specifics of the truck's truck bed dimensions from @ronpac and @larrypride, with the seller providing precise measurements to clear any confusion. Some users pointed out issues related to the listing, such as @texasrocks noting an axel code discrepancy that was promptly addressed by the seller.
Negative: Conversely, there were critical remarks regarding the truck's features. @CDehne and @jpf1301 raised concerns about the brush truck's lack of a winch and labeled the pump's characteristics as misleading, questioning the use of the term 'legendary' to describe what they considered standard or low-pressure equipment. Additionally, @jpf1301 underscored a broader skepticism about the seller’s claims regarding the pump’s performance, asserting that many in the fire service do not view the PB18 as high-pressure, thereby suggesting a potential disconnect between the seller's description and actual capabilities.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Valenti (The Seller) expresses gratitude for potential buyers visiting the listing and hopes that the Cadillac will find a new family to cherish it like the previous one did. @boaboyoz admires the vehicle, describing it as a delightful DeVille in a striking red color, indicating an appreciation for its aesthetics. Additionally, @lndyCarFan shares a nostalgic sentiment about mid to late 60s Cadillac Convertibles, noting the appeal of their subtle fins compared to earlier models, and reminisces about the unique features of the era, like the double ashtray under the dash.
Neutral: @Valenti (The Seller) addresses inquiries regarding the Cadillac's functionality, confirming that while the A/C needs servicing, heating works properly. They also clarify that power seats are indeed functional despite some initial confusion. Comments from enthusiasts like @BigRed and @prwright5 inquire about the specifications and options related to the vehicle's seats, with @vr240z asking for more details about the transmission maintenance, highlighting a mix of technical questions from potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's authenticity and condition emerge through comments from users like @Spartanman, who questions the accuracy of the fender tag translation, suggesting a potential error regarding the assembly plant. @rl240z raises alarming queries about the presence of putty near the convertible top and possible previous transmission leaks, while also probing what towing the vehicle had previously done. Throughout the discussion, there's an undercurrent of caution regarding restoration and maintenance, signaling that some buyers may be hesitant about the car's overall state.
|
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is praised for its overall aesthetic appeal and performance. @AutobarnCollection (The Seller) emphasizes that the bike runs and looks great, providing reassurance to potential buyers. Commenters like @sdrcp share a sentimental connection to the bike's color, appreciating its beauty and significance. Additionally, @Ozzybud positively acknowledges the bike's excellent condition and relatively low mileage, further complimenting it as a classic ride.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions regarding the bike's title and genuine model year, indicating that while it is titled as a 1975 Honda CB550, there are characteristics, such as the gauge and exhaust system, suggesting it aligns more closely with a 1976 CB550K. @bqpqfb and @slantski provide clarifications regarding the potential discrepancies based on frame and engine numbers while @AutobarnCollection (The Seller) acknowledges these concerns, stating that it is common for titles from that era to have errors.
Negative: Concerns about the bike's authenticity and condition have been raised by several commenters, including @Mackinac and @preez77. They question whether the speedometer and tachometer are original and call attention to possible signs of the bike running lean, visible through exhaust pipe discoloration. @Ozzybud is critical of the listing photos, believing they fail to showcase the bike properly. Additionally, concerns about potential modifications and the history of the bike arise, with some commenters demanding documentation to verify claims about its mileage and engine work.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Bordeaux highlights the elegance and sophistication of the old Packards, showcasing their unmatched distinction. @Dollycat3 finds the 120B model absolutely beautiful and elegant, while @TimTech admires its remarkable condition for a vehicle that is 90 years old. @Capt._Doug reminisces about the classic design features, noting the high quality and reliability of the engineering during that era which makes these cars still delightful to drive. @WhidbeyBob (The Seller) emphasizes the thorough restoration, mentioning the comprehensive reupholstery done by the previous owner that maintains the car's classic appeal.
Neutral: @MontanaBob raises questions about the interior, particularly the door panels and whether the seats and headliner have also been restored. @CraigInPA inquires about the windscreen trims and notes some paint cracking, yet acknowledges the overall good condition of the paint. @SteveMack_CT suggests a potential improvement regarding the fuel line and highlights the added electric fuel pump for better reliability, indicating that while the car has some quirks, it possesses desirable features and capabilities.
Negative: @pjarhead states that although they are captivated by the vehicle, they find it unaffordable and impractical due to a lack of garage space. @MontanaBob also points out possible issues with the wiper blades and their absence, implying it might be a drawback for potential buyers. @Adobe mentions concerns over whether some features like signals work, and @OlderGuy49 addresses similar uncertainty regarding the functionality of the lights, which could deter some interested buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its classic design and color. @440belvedere found it to be "very cool," while @Brodphish noted that the "CC1 light blue" finish gives off a vibrant mid-sixties vibe, looking even better in person. @bobearski pointed out that the car still carries its original California black plate, which could be a bonus for someone looking to register it there. The nostalgia factor was also emphasized, with @bosshoss3406pack reminiscing about their friend's 1966 Belvedere II and confirming the iconic status of this model within the automotive world. Additionally, @Napolison and @69Daytona shared fond memories of their own classic Mopar vehicles, reinforcing the car's lasting appeal and great design.
Neutral: Several comments touched on the vehicle's condition and its technical aspects. @MWDI1388 (The Seller) confirmed that most gauges, including the coolant temperature and gas gauge, are functional, though the odometer is currently inoperable. @avapmj noted that the car appears well preserved, commenting on a similar model they owned. Discussions also referenced potential modifications, with @Valiantjim suggesting upgrades to enhance performance while maintaining the classic look. Commenters were interested in specific details about the vehicle, such as the working features and potential enhancements, indicating a thoughtful consideration of its value and usability.
Negative: Some comments hinted at concerns regarding the functionality of certain features. @bobearski specifically inquired about the operational status of the gauges, highlighting a common worry among potential buyers regarding the car's condition. Additionally, @avapmj expressed surprise that the car was originally ordered without power steering, suggesting that this may not be ideal for all drivers. Despite these concerns, the overall discourse remained largely positive, with many acknowledging the vehicle’s charm and the excitement of bidding.
|
|
 |
Positive: The 2005 Chrysler Crossfire Limited Roadster, with only 37,000 miles, is being presented by @Collectibleclassics as a standout vehicle. They emphasize their commitment to smooth, transparent transactions, boasting a 4.9 out of 5 Google Review rating and hundreds of satisfied customers. The vehicle features, such as the Boss Touchscreen with back-up camera and Mach Speed Performance exhaust, enhance its appeal. Additionally, the seller offers assistance with logistics, including nationwide shipping and inspections using trusted local shops.
Neutral: Several potential buyers have raised questions about the vehicle's condition, particularly concerning the dashboard. @cavesster noted a lack of photos depicting the center of the dash and requested clarification on possible holes drilled into it. @Brine0724 asked about the capability of controlling heating and air conditioning via the screen, while @G53 requested better pictures and expressed concern about the display fitting and operational effectiveness of the controls.
Negative: Concerns have been expressed regarding the vehicle's dashboard issues by commenters such as @mrk123, who mentioned excessive curb rash on the wheels and highlighted the need to address dashboard problems. @cavesster also inquired about the functionality of the cup holder, suggesting there may be undetected issues that require attention. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, responded by clarifying that the dashboard damage was due to a previously mounted cellphone holder and assured that all vehicle features were operational, but potential buyers still voiced apprehensions about their overall enjoyment with the condition. This has led some potential bidders, like @aatyler56, to question if there are any mechanical issues with the car itself.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the beauty and appeal of the Grand Wagoneer, with @dollycat3 calling it a 'beautiful GW' and @jsamol praising the video presentation and describing the vehicle as a 'gorgeous Wagonmaster Waggy.' @frogmanjake also appreciates the thoroughness of the video, noting that the unique color combination looks 'awesome.' The seller, @enthusiastic_enthusiast, expresses gratitude towards commenters, showcasing a positive interaction and engagement throughout the auction process. This positive feedback reflects the general excitement and admiration for the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments from the seller address inquiries and provide information about the vehicle, including potential issues like the air conditioning system. @male asks about the condition of the steering wheel and any rust areas, while @justneid mentions a concern about the A/C not blowing cold air and inquires about its operational status. The seller responds thoroughly, indicating that there is a video inspection that covers these details, and emphasizes a willingness to answer any additional questions. There is an overall informative tone that suggests transparency about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: On the downside, there are some concerns raised by commenters regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the air conditioning system and potential rust. @justneid points out that while the A/C is mentioned in the description, it doesn't blow cold, which raises questions about its functionality. @HALDOC also seeks clarity on whether the A/C system is still R-12 or upgraded to R-134a. Additionally, @Turbo-Z notes fuel efficiency concerns, estimating that one might only achieve 8 mpg with a light foot. These comments suggest that there are aspects of the vehicle that may require attention from potential buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Toys4life (The Seller) shares enthusiasm about the 4Runner, citing its powerful driving experience and unique diesel engine. The seller emphasizes transparency, inviting potential buyers to ask questions and assuring them that the vehicle has been professionally swapped with all necessary parts. Commenters like @mynameistimo and @Mongoose55 express admiration for the vehicle, with @mynameistimo referring to it as 'sleepy' yet lovable, and @Mongoose55 noting its exceptional qualities, enhancing the overall positive atmosphere around the sale.
Neutral: There are practical inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition and functionality from users like @Sweli, who asks about the donor motor mileage, and @ARSHAH, who is curious about the 4WD indicator light. @UscPhd97_ and @Buck208 ask if everything functions as it should, including air conditioning. The seller responds swiftly to these concerns, confirming the operational status of various features, including a working AC and no leaks, which showcases a willingness to engage with the community and ensure transparency.
Negative: Some users raise concerns about documentation and potential unresolved issues with the vehicle. @Sweli requests information on the donor motor's mileage and operating pathways, while @arsah raises questions about emissions testing and the vehicle's title status after the engine swap. @Hurstolds1442 queries whether it has a clean or salvage title, showing buyers’ hesitations about the vehicle's background. While the seller has reassured that it's a clean title, these inquiries highlight some apprehensions among potential buyers about ensuring all regulatory aspects are addressed.
|
|
1994 Saab 900 Turbo Convertible Commemorative Edition 5-Speed
YS3AL75T2R7008198
Lot 206229
Private Party
 |
Positive: @SAABNUTT praised the car's good looks and condition, highlighting that it seems well presented and cared for, suggesting that it will provide joy for its new owner. @MonsterJoe and @Tigers196884 also expressed admiration for the vehicle, emphasizing the advantages of having European headlights and the car’s potential as a solid investment in the classic car market. @LoTex appreciated the car being just broken in at 105k miles and admired the wood gearshift knob.
Neutral: @Ryanwduffy (The Seller) shared multiple details about the car’s features and history, confirming that the car is in nice condition and fun to drive, and openly addressing queries from potential buyers regarding aspects like the Nardi steering wheel, exhaust system, and tire date codes. He also committed to providing additional photos and videos to clarify questions about the car's condition, including aspects of rust and service history.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about aspects of the vehicle's condition. @mw5 inquired about leaks and inspection status, while @jaikey asked about the engine mounts and potential rust issues, particularly around the wheel wells. Additionally, @saabman pointed out that the convertible top color was not original, and @APCoslow and @charleyrob mentioned scratches in the paint that may have been reflections or smudges, raising questions about the car's exterior quality.
|
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their love and enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its appealing design and unique characteristics. @Thefatguido simply stated, 'Man I love this thing!' while @volvoracer9 mentioned, 'Love this car.' @Kwe called it a 'bucket list car,' and @Caymanorcarrera commented on its 'amazingly cool looking' appearance. @r1ch999999 and @AnkurGT echoed similar sentiments, with the latter adding it to his personal aspirations. @LongDucDong drew attention to the car's intricate details, emphasizing how they contribute to its overall appeal, describing features like the headlight bezels and the shift knob as 'delicious little details.'
Neutral: Some comments sought clarification and information about the vehicle's history and condition. @volvoracer9 questioned the ping-ponging of ownership, which @Reconjr explained as a sale to a long-term, repeat buyer known for his collection, confirming he was the car's only U.S. owner. Other neutral comments included inquiries about the car's running condition, with @Armchair asking about mechanical issues and how well it drives. @Uncle_kiki asked if the car is a 'runner,' to which @Reconjr assured that it runs and drives excellently, and even mentioned uploading a video showcasing its condition.
Negative: A few concerns were raised, primarily about the vehicle's mechanical state and features. @Armchair was curious about the age and condition of the tires and whether all minor functions like the heater and lights were working properly. @Reconjr acknowledged that while everything works as it should, the fog lights are intermittent. Additionally, @Loungin112 expressed skepticism towards @r1ch999999's body swap idea for a Miata, indicating that not all ideas about modifying the car were received positively. Finally, @royclausen lamented the fact that the car was designed for the U.S. market, expressing a personal dislike for right-hand drive models, which paints a bittersweet picture in the context of appreciation for this specific vehicle.
|
|
 |
Positive: @pt600 highlights the G63 as one of the most iconic SUVs, praising its distinctive silhouette and luxurious yet robust design. @RobToTheT expresses a desire to own a similar vehicle again, suggesting a strong emotional connection to the model. The overall appeal of the G63 is acknowledged, noting how it combines a militaristic appearance with opulence, making it a unique presence in the SUV market.
Neutral: @ET550 provides clarifications regarding service records, explaining the types of services that correspond to the mileage indicators mentioned in the Carfax report. Meanwhile, @silverarrowcarsltd (The Seller) reassures potential buyers that the car was well-maintained by the previous owner, a doctor from Beverly Hills, and offers to seek further service information. @KidAtlantic and @Porscheman81 both request additional service records and information about past services, indicating that buyers are keen on transparency regarding maintenance history.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @KidAtlantic about rust on the transmission hexagon nuts despite the vehicle appearing clean otherwise. @djpj_451 warns about potential issues that low mileage G63s can face, such as oil leaks that might not be visible on a Carfax report, suggesting the necessity of a pre-purchase inspection (PPI). Additionally, @RobToTheT requests images of common rust damage areas on these models, indicating a level of apprehension about underlying issues that may not be immediately evident.
|
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their enthusiasm for the 4Runner, with @RumbleAuto calling it an amazing vehicle and @SupraFreak praising it as a sweet rig, particularly noting its OG status and unique features like the 1JZ engine. @Haydenkink pointed out the excitement surrounding the auction, indicating that it's an incredible opportunity, especially considering the low current bids compared to previous years. @ScottM, who has a connection with the previous owner, also complimented the build and encouraged potential buyers to have fun with it. Overall, the sentiment around the 4Runner is very positive, highlighting its appeal and the joy it brings to drivers.
Neutral: There were inquiries about the vehicle's specifications, such as whether it has air conditioning. @jsbat posed this question, to which @Shorty8341, the seller, responded that although all parts are present, the A/C doesn't function and may only need a recharge. Other comments included questions about the reserve price, with @sckipp811 explaining that the vehicle might not sell if the bids do not meet this threshold, suggesting it could be set high. Additionally, @Sailandfish asked for the vehicle's height, which @Shorty8341 confirmed as 77.5 inches. These neutral comments reflect the interested audience's desire for clarification before making bids.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance, particularly the A/C issue. @lostmonster criticized the decision to leave the A/C problem unresolved, questioning why it wasn't taken to a shop for confirmation. @Shorty8341 addressed this by explaining that while he had the vehicle serviced, the A/C was not a priority compared to ensuring its overall safety. @sckipp811 also questioned the interpretation of the term 'killer deal,' hinting at skepticism about the auction's outcome and the presence of a reserve price. These comments highlight a sense of caution from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's condition.
|
|
 |
Positive: @LB1 mentioned that the vehicle has a very nice horsepower rating, indicating a strong performance aspect. @jribler described it as a nice example, suggesting that overall appearance and condition are appealing. @Brisbinda inquired about recent long trips but seemed satisfied with the answer regarding the vehicle driving fine on a recent 10-mile highway test, reflecting a positive driving experience.
Neutral: @Rotors pointed out that the vehicle has air, but not from the factory, which is informative but lacks a clear positive or negative slant. @TheSpease (The Seller) provided documentation and photo updates to address questions, showing transparency in communication. The questions regarding features from @jribler indicate an interest in the vehicle's specifications but do not carry an overtly positive or negative tone.
Negative: @David_P raised a concern regarding damage to the rear seats that needed clarification, which reflects negatively on the vehicle's condition. @AndrewC was informed by @TheSpease (The Seller) that the AC does not work, which could be a dealbreaker for potential buyers. @jribler also expressed concern about the vehicle's mileage due to the odometer replacement, indicating potential issues with reliability or trustworthiness of the information.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the car, particularly highlighting its attractive Arctic White color and unique specifications. @ExcelloM1 enthusiastically shared their approval with a series of emojis. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) emphasized the car's maintenance history, stating that the previous owner was diligent about servicing the vehicle and that it is in incredible condition. The standout features, such as the clean interior and original specification, were noted, confirming its desirability among Corvette enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments were focused on gathering additional information about the vehicle. @VTbroseph inquired about the original stereo system, while @997corn requested ownership and maintenance history. @C4geek asked about the aftermarket tint on the windows, and @techemann sought clarification on the car's location, showing a keen interest in understanding more about the vehicle's specifics. The Seller addressed these queries, confirming that they do not possess the original stereo and provided details about maintenance records being included in the listing.
Negative: Some feedback indicated concerns or confusion about the car's condition. @cw5150 pointed out discrepancies regarding the tint on the windshield, questioning the Seller's response about the original material. @Z07Vette noted that the car's headlights were not LED, which some might view as a drawback given modern standards. However, @rgilson7 clarified the windshield's capabilities, indicating that the information provided could assist in alleviating buyer concerns. Overall, while there were positive aspects mentioned, some uncertainties lingered regarding specific features.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the S2000 CR #371, with @Nismo_Native stating it is the peak model of the series. @PittsCR describes it as the nicest CR they've seen, and @TerpsMD37 rates it 9/10 for its aggressive presence and clean interior. Overall, the vehicle is recognized as a true enthusiast’s machine that offers a thrilling driving experience while maintaining collector appeal. The seller, @StevenB7, emphasizes the vehicle's reliability and low-maintenance history, which has garnered positive attention from potential buyers and other S2000 enthusiasts alike. The car has been maintained to high standards and showcases a combination of performance upgrades that enhance its driving dynamics.
Neutral: Several comments highlight aspects of the vehicle that are neither particularly positive nor negative. For instance, @Newton2022 acknowledges the work done following LHT Performance guidelines and expresses interest in the maintenance quality. @rogeral inquires about the presence of dents or scratches, prompting an assurance from the seller about the vehicle's condition and any work done. Observations about minor imperfections, such as scuffs on the front lip and comments about the hardtop's rattle, are taken into consideration but do not detract significantly from the overall appeal of the car. The consensus among some commentors is that while the car could benefit from minor touch-ups, it is still a remarkable vehicle.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding its physical condition. @Random9 asks for close-up pictures of any scratches or damages, indicating a desire for transparency about the car's exterior state. Similarly, @rogeral points out potential door dings and seeks confirmation from the seller about their extent. @Outatime84 and @mhawkeONT express reservations about the hardtop rattle, questioning if it is as noisy as it seems in videos. While these comments highlight common issues found in many vehicles, particularly in older sports cars, they do not overshadow the car's overall desirability and performance history, as emphasized by the seller's detailed explanations.
|
|
 |
Positive: @LesJohn praised the truck, describing it as a "beautiful old truck" and appreciating that it has been kept mostly original, noting it looks much better than it did when on the trailer. @Ashton25 (The Seller) responded positively to this comment, showing gratitude for the feedback.
Neutral: @Ashton25 (The Seller) provided information about the truck's history, mentioning it has never been in the rain and has been kept in a temperature-controlled garage for 13 years. When @Jfred0880 inquired about the year of the motor, @Ashton25 responded that it is believed to be from 1946 and also discussed the historical context of Ford's brake systems, noting important years related to the model.
Negative: @Jfred0880 pointed out a discrepancy regarding the motor's distributor, suggesting it does not appear to match the specifications of a 1946 model, which raises questions about the accuracy of the motor's year. @Ashton25 acknowledged this possibility but maintained that other indicators suggest it may still be a 1946 Mercury motor, highlighting some uncertainty amidst the discussion.
|
|
 |
Positive: @tracedog67, the seller, describes the car as a remarkable example that has been well-maintained, even highlighting its immaculate condition both inside and out. The car has a tight structure, evidenced by the condition of its door hinges and a maintained cooling system that functions perfectly. The seller took the initiative to address minor issues, including a couple of fixes on the radio and seat adjustments, ensuring everything works well before sale. The previous owner, a World War II veteran, adds to the car's history, contributing to its appeal as an exceptional piece of automotive history.
Neutral: Several commenters share their experiences discussing the reliability of BMW models, particularly comparing the E39 and E60 series. @2002WS6 mentions their own issues with a 2011 328xi, which they describe as unreliable due to excessive plastic components. Users like @cj11 and @cognoscenti also contribute thoughts on engine reliability, specifically pointing out that early E60 models carry over engines from E39, alongside newer engines introducing both advantages and complications. The discussions emphasize the importance of maintenance history in determining reliability, with some suggesting more issues may arise in newer models without proper care.
Negative: Despite the positive impressions, potential buyers raise concerns about the state of the cooling system and transmission service records, which @aiden927 and @PhilP123 inquire about directly. @tracedog67 acknowledges that while recent work has been done on specific components, the full status of the cooling system and suspension parts remains uncertain, mentioning they might be original due to the car's low mileage. Some commenters express skepticism about relying solely on the recorded maintenance history, citing that the car has not had extensive service documented in its records which could imply hidden maintenance needs.
|
|
 |
Positive: @classichondaman describes the vehicle as a "little jewel" and expresses a desire to drive it across the country, indicating enthusiasm and admiration for the car's charm. @thomas50shades (The Seller) supports this, calling it an "awesome little matchbox SUV" and encouraging potential buyers with the promise of answering any questions about it. They acknowledge that despite its charming nature, running it wide open might be taxing, but peeking into back roads could provide an enjoyable driving experience.
Neutral: @onlyhonda4me finds the car cool but expresses uncertainty about whether it would fit in their garage, humorously referencing a Rubbermaid garden-shed. @thomas50shades (The Seller) humorously replied to this concern, noting the car's size and likening it to a Rubbermaid product, which lightens the mood about the garage space issue. @brakeservo raises a practical question about registering the vehicle in California, to which @thomas50shades (The Seller) offers to explain to the winning bidder, showing openness and a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns arise when @brakeservo questions how the vehicle was registered in California, suggesting potential challenges or complications related to the vehicle's registration status. This inquiry introduces a note of skepticism regarding the vehicle's usability in specific regions. Additionally, while the comments about the interior utility of the SUV are light-hearted, some oversight from @thomas50shades (The Seller) regarding the appearance of toes in a photo could detract from the professional presentation of the vehicle.
|
|
 |
Positive: @jim53066 praises the vehicle as a "nice solid example of a true classic," while @jersey_joe expresses excitement for the auction, noting its surroundings in a great photo at Van Sant Airport. @Trucker65 appreciates the aesthetics, mentioning that he loves the picture of the airplane reflected in the rearview mirror. @Michiana, proud owner of a rebuilt ‘51 Jeepster, adds that owning such a vehicle is a privilege.
Neutral: @wingsnwheels (The Seller) shares information about the Jeepster, encouraging potential buyers to ask questions and offering to arrange in-person viewings. He expresses enthusiasm for finding a good home for this classic vehicle and invites the Jeepster community to weigh in with their expertise. He mentions plans to show the Jeepster running in person and indicates his availability for further communications.
Negative:
|
|
 |
Positive: @Revrider praises the car for its aesthetic appeal despite his initial reluctance towards red vehicles, suggesting it has strong performance potential. @EJoos expresses excitement about the new horsepower available in the Sky, while @CarzAndMotorcyclz believes this model is what the factory should have produced originally. @Caymanorcarrera admires the engine swap, specifically the LS engine, adding a personal touch with affection. @Vette2 enthusiastically describes the upgrade from 260 hp to 495 hp as indicative of energetic motoring fun, highlighting the performance benefits of the LS3 engine. @mike_rockwell appreciates the expertise of Mallett in handling these conversions, noting that it offers significant joy to drivers.
Neutral: The vehicle has a delivery date of June 12, 2006, with a VIN indicating it is a 2007 Saturn Sky Convertible. A safety recall was issued regarding the passenger presence system (PPS) which detects if the passenger seat is occupied and suppresses the front airbag when necessary. This recall, linked to potential airbag deployment failure in case of an accident if the system fails, is acknowledged but does not seem to impact the car’s appeal significantly. The seller,@pbernard16046, provides detailed specifications about the car's modifications and options, noting that the original A/C has been updated and is fully operational.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about modifications potentially affecting the vehicle's integrity. @doorite1 questions if the added weight of the LS3 causes chassis issues, while @Whatsupwidat raises the potential for emission qualification concerns with the swap. @q1werty2 is skeptical about the lack of documentation from Mallett regarding parts and work completed for the conversion, indicating doubts about the reliability of the modifications. Additionally, @Leosuggs notes that the cruise control is incompatible with the new setup, highlighting an operational drawback despite the overall excitement surrounding the vehicle.
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed excitement and admiration for the vehicle, with @Manywheels59 describing it as "very cool" and @stokes28 appreciating the creative aspect of the project and the engine sound. The seller, @fiminod, engages positively with the community by sharing insights about the car's history and potential, promoting the Mistral as a starting point for someone ambitious. Further, @ClassicheMasters highlights the project as an honest opportunity for restoration, emphasizing a supportive network that could assist in bringing the car back to life.
Neutral: Many comments reflect a mixed view of the car's condition and potential, noting it is an interesting project that requires considerable work. @schmock88 mentions that they know a capable bodywork person, while @ICTGOAT points out that repairs appear straightforward, focusing on the minor damage to the seat foam. @Bumpy raises concerns about parts possibly going missing over the years due to the vehicle being disassembled, while @Fleche_dOr discusses the historical context and auction performance of similar models.
Negative: Several commenters share disappointment over the car's neglect, with @Davem311 lamenting how it fell into such disrepair, and @shabah210 questioning how such wealth could lead to such neglect. @jcp911s humorously inquires about the dip tank's survival amidst the chaos, and @Bumpy warns about the risks of missing parts in restoration. The overarching sentiment in this section indicates frustration with the carelessness displayed towards a classic vehicle, which some feel diminishes its value and legacy.
|
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the Morgan Plus 8, highlighting its unique aesthetic and historical significance. @valiantjim mentioned the appeal of the classic woodwork and the sliding pillar front suspension, while @Corgi123 commented on how the car's blue color takes their breath away. @drallen praised the vehicle's condition, stating it appears 'as new' and noting that the seller, MLE, is well-regarded in the collector car community for his meticulous care of the vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, MLE, provided key information about the car's specifications and history. They clarified that the engine is the original one sourced from Land Rover and addressed concerns regarding the blue hoses, suggesting they could easily be replaced if desired. Additional technical inquiries from commenters included questions about engine performance and specific measurements of the car, with MLE promising to provide further details to facilitate prospective buyers' decisions.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the car's condition, specifically regarding potential inconsistencies like lacquer cracks in the dash and questions about the alignment of the headlights. @rickst asked for clearer pictures of the dash veneer, while @Piloto66 noted discrepancies in the headlight positioning, which MLE attributed to the unique nature of hand-built cars. Additionally, @gomog mentioned the ambiguity in the color description, suggesting it can refer to various shades, indicating some potential buyers might have reservations about the exact appearance of the car.
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle's appearance and suitability for autocross, with @ssterry noting its nice look and readiness for racing. @SteelyBS expressed gratitude for @ssterry's educational comments, acknowledging the value they add. @fmiranda, the seller, appreciated the insightful discussion about the build and provided background on the vehicle's color, linking it to nostalgic memories from Miami.
Neutral: Several comments included inquiries about specific aspects of the vehicle, such as the purpose of the radiator under the front of the car (@Dothetime) and details about the 6.0 engine (@WIZZZZ). @fmiranda confirmed the presence of a transmission cooler and an electric fan, while also addressing questions about the engine's specifications and providing updates about additional features like the overdrive transmission (@aquavoyager).
Negative: Some commenters expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle's functionality. @Dickiee requested evidence of the car's performance, like a cold start and a driving video, before considering a purchase. Additionally, there were questions about unknown mechanisms and features that may have left potential buyers uncertain about the car's comprehensive details.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Chowhall loves the 71 stripe of the vehicle, while @Glwa,Kevozzi57 describes it as a sweet little South Carolina Peach. @cincycaddy finds the 350cc + 2 stroke to be a real hoot, indicating a fun riding experience. @thatsakillerpiece highlights the Suzuki's impressive performance specs, noting that despite its smaller engine size of 315 cc, it produces 39 HP, matching the performance of the Yamaha RD 350, making it a thrilling ride. @DTB33big reminisces about having owned a green one and regrets selling it, showing an emotional connection to this model. @mlsceo comments on its appearance, calling it a nice bike, while @NormalNorm is keen on adding it to their collection, emphasizing its desirability.
Neutral: @Thangdinator (The Seller) responds to @mlsceo's inquiry about starting with clarifications about the bike needing 3-4 kicks to start after a ride. @DTB33big raises concerns about the throttle response observed in the video, asking if it was hanging up. In response, Thangdinator explains that the throttle was rough initially due to high rpm but has since been fixed, indicating ongoing maintenance and care for the vehicle. @Lago888 requests a demonstration of the bike idling down to a reasonable RPM, hinting at potential issues with the carburetors but remains neutral about the matter, and @rofandofy notes the rarity of this specific model compared to its larger siblings, adding to its overall value.
Negative: Some concerns arise around the bike's operational state, specifically about @DTB33big's observation of the throttle potentially not functioning smoothly. @Lago888's request about idling raises the possibility of maintenance issues, suggesting the bike may need attention on its carburetor if it couldn't idle down properly. Although these comments show interest, they do indicate some hesitation from potential buyers due to the bike's apparent needs and its distance from interested collectors.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics highlights the low mileage of the 2003 BMW Z4 Roadster, noting it has only 10,000 miles and is in excellent condition both inside and out. The vehicle is presented as a standout example in Titanium Silver Metallic with Black Oregon Leather Upholstery, appealing to collectors and enthusiasts alike. The seller emphasizes their commitment to integrity and transparency, stating their dedication to smoothing out the buying process with high ratings and positive customer feedback.
Neutral: Commenter @VTys2k remarks on the auction status, suggesting that third time might be the charm for selling this vehicle, indicating some optimism while acknowledging the challenges faced in prior auctions. @Collectibleclassics provides information about the dealership and its processes, inviting potential buyers to inspect the vehicle and offering various services, such as nationwide shipping and assistance with logistics, thus creating a clear picture of the buying experience without overtly promoting the car itself.
Negative: @Collectibleclassics mentions a prior high bidder who backed out, which has led to wasted time for interested parties and frustration for the seller. This reflects on the challenges and integrity issues sometimes faced in online auctions. Additionally, the presence of a 'hoard of Z3s in the background' noted by @KarmannClassic may suggest questions about the overall inventory and quality of the offerings, potentially casting a shadow on the exclusivity of this particular Z4.
|
|
 |
Positive: @bigmike55 expressed admiration, stating, "Wow, love it!" @4runner777 noted the vehicle's potential as a "Perfect Uber vehicle" for summer beach work, showcasing its practical use. @Wob (The Seller) shared a heartwarming story about the car's original ownership, revealing that it was bought as a gift for a daughter who ultimately declined it. He added, "Wonderful buyer and very kind," indicating that the vehicle has a positive association with its previous owner.
Neutral: @VintagePete commented on the uniqueness of the Jolly-Style cars, indicating some skepticism regarding whether a Beetle fits the Jolly-style category effectively, suggesting both design and structural considerations. @JANDERS noted there were not many comments on the vehicle, which surprised him, but he acknowledged that opinions varied, with some liking it and some not, emphasizing the different approach taken by the builder. @Josefitz pointed out the continuity of the seller, indicating that the vehicle did not sell in its initial transaction.
Negative: @lilcarlover questioned the reason for the car's resale so soon after being purchased, hinting at underlying issues. @Sunroof raised concerns about the vehicle's structural integrity, specifically the reinforcement aspects that are generally present in VW convertibles, expressing confusion about the handling in this model. @dc302 also voiced concern, inquiring if shipping options were available through the platform, reflecting a potential barrier for interested buyers.
|
|
2002 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am SLP Firehawk Convertible 6-Speed
2G2FV32G422152036
Lot 206264
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Bennichols01 (The Seller) emphasizes that the car is factory original, except for a new convertible top, which highlights its authentic collectible status. @dagnabbit7 praises the beautiful tan interior and notes that the vehicle has the perfect mileage for confident driving. @ett777 describes the car as a classic, having had a positive personal experience with his own vehicle of the same model, praising the performance and sound of the LS1 engine.
Neutral: Various commenters seek additional information about the car, such as @tlwjkw asking about its registration status and @MattyIce423 inquiring about its original selling dealer. @Purpleman noticed a potential autograph on a part of the car and @Bennichols01 (The Seller) confirms that there are indeed autographs on the plastic covers.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle in the comments section. Most feedback is either neutral inquiries or positive notes about the car's condition and history.
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's condition, specifically highlighting the 'magnificent' XK 140 MC Drophead and the appealing red interior. @GDogg praised the car's aesthetic, while @Caymanorcarrera shared excitement over its historic value as a birth year car. Additionally, @JagOwner detailed a memorable experience with sourcing parts for the car, underscoring a personal connection to the restoration journey, and @taosman54 also shared his success in finding parts, reflecting the community's fondness for these vintage vehicles.
Neutral: Discussion around the vehicle's title and identification numbers indicated mixed perspectives. @JagOwner confirmed that although the title displays the engine number instead of the chassis number, this practice is not uncommon in certain states, which reassured some potential buyers. Furthermore, @Bordeaux noted that the title's discrepancies would not hinder registration in Germany, emphasizing a broader understanding of how different authorities handle VIN verification.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the accuracy of the vehicle's title, specifically the incorrect engine number being used as the Vehicle ID Number in the State of California. @SSpro and other commentors emphasized the importance of correcting the title to reflect the chassis serial number for proper identification, while @johnmereness questioned the necessity of concern over the title's discrepancies. The conversation hinted at a level of frustration among some parties about the potential bureaucratic hurdles involved in achieving clarity in vehicle identification.
|
|
 |
Positive: @CBodden, the seller, shares their positive experience with the 2014 Porsche Boxster, noting that after 29 months of ownership and approximately 27,000 miles driven, they have thoroughly enjoyed the vehicle. They describe it as comfortable, practical, economical, and well-engineered, emphasizing its capabilities as a sports car while contradicting the notion that Boxsters are not comfortable. @oberoileo also compliments the car, appreciating the beige and blue combination and the timeless design created by designer Tony Hatter, highlighting the car as a future classic.
Neutral: @CBodden provides an informative response to bidders about the vehicle’s features and previous trips taken with the Boxster, inviting questions and offering additional pictures. The seller also addresses a common concern raised by @savena regarding damage to the door panel by explaining that it is a widespread issue with models produced in the 2012-2016 range, due to a mandated change in glue types. This transparency shows the seller's willingness to clarify potential concerns about the car.
Negative: @alar10 expresses skepticism about the seller’s comment regarding the Boxster's comfort, indicating a belief that it may not be as widely accepted. They seem to challenge the assertion that Boxsters are overlooked in terms of comfort. Additionally, there’s a hint of disappointment in the comments regarding the door panel’s damage issue, which could deter some potential buyers worried about past repairs and the inherent risks associated with buying a used car.
|
|
 |
Positive: @T11ss3 and @Forthefords both praise the truck's appearance, describing it as awesome and nice looking. This appreciation reflects a general good impression of the vehicle's aesthetics. @Kuhnhenn92 (The Seller) is engaging positively with potential buyers, indicating he will provide driving videos and has updated the AC system, assuring that recent maintenance has been done.
Neutral: @Kuhnhenn92 (The Seller) provides detailed explanations about the vehicle's features, including information on the AC system and recent work on components like the transfer case. He is proactive in addressing the concerns raised, such as the transfer case leaks and the door lock functionality. He encourages potential buyers to ask questions, emphasizing transparency about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @Wooly1 points out potential issues with the AC system and highlights a leak in the transfer case, indicating possible maintenance concerns that future owners should consider. @Mark701 raises questions about the door locks not functioning properly and requests further information on repairs, suggesting there may be unresolved issues with the vehicle.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's color, particularly noting it as a unique shade not commonly seen on MINI models. @mayjer and @whateva both highlighted the great appearance and rarity of the color, while @malasalfurther commented on it resembling classic 90s hues. The seller, @silverarrowauto, emphasized the car's pristine condition after a thorough inspection in Japan and shared their personal satisfaction with how well it drives. Additionally, there was positivity about the vehicle's automatic transmission, with @mayjer mentioning that it has been a part of the MINI lineup since 1965 and can be enjoyable with manual gear selection.
Neutral: Some commenters inquired about specific details of the vehicle, such as insurance costs in New Jersey posed by @stevenwyl and the car's paint condition raised by @850mini. The seller addressed these inquiries, providing estimates on insurance and confirming that the paint looks very good with no noticeable issues, apart from potentially one painted panel. Questions on minor features and the condition of components, like the A/C system and custom wiring for an aftermarket radio, were also brought up by @iamcdn, and the seller responded with thorough clarifications.
Negative: Conversely, there were concerns about the automatic transmission's acceptance among traditional MINI enthusiasts. @stickycat criticized the auto transmission as being a potential drawback for resale value, stating that it attracts fewer buyers. This sentiment was echoed by other commenters, including @Bill.H, who cautioned that the automatic is seen as a hindrance in the classic MINI market. Additionally, @stickycat voiced frustration with negative commentators who tendered unproductive criticisms, suggesting they could diminish the sales prospects of vehicles posted on platforms like BaT.
|
|
 |
Positive: Commentors express admiration for the vehicle, citing its beauty and rarity. @Rajunz noted its removable glass roof, comparing it to T-tops, and wished the seller good luck. @Bluesmaster found the car striking, describing it as a sweet ride that would excel in nostalgia-driven video games. @Cplummer77 pointed out that the car is a great deal at its price, while @Koy0te emphasized its nostalgic appeal and potential in racing games.
Neutral: The seller, @marvmador, provided detailed information about the car, confirming that the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) wheels are not included, but mentioning that it comes with some aftermarket TSW wheels. The car’s heat and air conditioning systems work well, and there are no reported mechanical issues or oil leaks. He stated it was well cared for by the previous owner, who owned it for many years. Additional requests for information led @marvmador to clarify the status of the car's key fobs and confirm the tire size as 245/45 ZR17. He also promised to share more photos of the vehicle and discussed its rust treatment history.
Negative: Some comments pointed out potential concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and condition. @vwlove54 inquired about rust and corrosion, indicating awareness of the car's northeastern origins. @realrealmrcool raised a question about the timing belt, suggesting it may need replacement soon based on previous mechanic recommendations. Although @marvmador reassured that the car is clean and had a rust-inhibiting undercoating, the inquiries hinted at a level of caution among potential buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and appealing features. @bluesprite, who knows the original owner and restorer of the car, emphasized the high level of craftsmanship and professionalism involved in the restoration, backing it with a personal anecdote about attending a significant car event where the car garnered attention. @Neilv echoed this sentiment, noting the car's excellent condition, especially the interior and engine compartment. @CarPassion referred to the car as a beautiful example of the MGB GT model, while @Docdup1 praised the upgrade to an all-synchro gearbox as a notable plus.
Neutral: Several users sought technical information about the vehicle's specifications, particularly concerning axle widths and engine modifications. @Scott1957 and @Ross_Robbins engaged in a discussion about rear axle widths, while @Tom_S. and @joesalfa were interested in the gearbox specifics and engine specs, respectively. The seller, @rhively49, provided responses, noting the transmission characteristics and axles' compatibility. While some said the owner's choices, like the fiberglass hood, were unique, they didn’t detract from the overall admiration for the classic car.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some commenters regarding certain aspects of the car, including missing components and the replacement of original parts. @Ganjoka pointed out that the float bowl overflows were missing, which raised safety concerns, while @Ken864 lamented the absence of the original aluminum hood, questioning its replacement with fiberglass. @OneAlfaShort highlighted the need for more informative visuals, like driving videos and undercarriage photos, arguing these would enhance buyer confidence and engagement in the bidding process.
|
|
 |
Positive: @binderdundat highlighted the vehicle's rare color, expressing that Splash Green Mica is indeed stunning, especially in person. @eelwood also praised the color for its vibrant glow and noted that it garnered frequent compliments during ownership. @testo_junkie expressed admiration for the car's beauty and appreciated the seller's thoroughness and responsiveness in providing information about the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the car's specifications and background. @Sloowride (The Seller) clarified that while the car is standard with a 5-speed manual transmission, some models, like this one, come with an automatic option due to preference. There were also inquiries about the bubbling paint, which @Sloowride addressed, confirming it was just paint wrinkling, not rust, and shared details about the car's previous minor collision damage and its condition after being driven in the rain.
Negative: On the other hand, @BobKaye expressed concern over the car being 'crusty' underneath for its mileage, while @jpr lamented the presence of an automatic transmission, noting it wouldn't appeal to everyone. @SS_70 mentioned issues related to the fading yellow pigment in the Splash Green Mica paint, which could complicate touch-ups, and shared frustrations about the seating arrangement being unsuitable for taller drivers. Additionally, there were discussions about the tire date codes revealing older tires, with @jkom67 suggesting that the shop may have misled the previous owner.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle for its impressive condition and meticulous maintenance, with @RSwannabe sharing a long-standing acquaintance with the seller, noting Chris's impressive air-cooled Porsche collection. @cpsimmons21 emphasizes the seller's knowledge about classic Porsches, bolstering confidence in the vehicle's quality. Commenters like @Frida affirm that the Targa is beautifully built, combining style, reliability, and daily drivability, while compliments regarding the Signal Yellow color enhance its allure.
Neutral: Several participants seek clarification on specific details regarding the car's history and condition. @Flatops inquires about the original purchase location, while @Mcmang asks about dash cracks. The seller, @Endo911rs, responds to queries about previous modifications, paint history, and current cosmetic imperfections, assuring all concerns regarding the car's upkeep are addressed accurately. Additionally, comments mention the car's mileage and performance updates, contributing to an overall neutral stance on its mechanical aspects.
Negative: While the overall sentiment is positive, there are minor critiques noted, such as @Caymanorcarrera's dislike for the rear speakers and some doubts from @TRCRW about potential imperfections found in the undercarriage. @UOLDDOG questions the nature of a paint flaw in one of the photos. Additionally, several comments indicate that the beauty and desirability of the car come at a price, with some lamenting that they can't afford it, reflecting a sense of envy among potential buyers.
|
|
2003 Harley-Davidson Ultra Classic 100th Anniversary w/Sidecar
1HD1FCW413Y626854
Lot 206258
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Mrhobbs expressed excitement about riding in the vehicle, indicating a positive experience and enthusiasm for the car's features. The comments suggest a sense of enjoyment and engagement with the vehicle, highlighting its value in providing memorable moments.
Neutral: @MattEvans clarified a technical detail regarding the vehicle, specifically addressing @broodie's question about the presence of a reverse gear. This indicates a straightforward exchange of information without additional emotional connotations, reflecting a professional and informative interaction.
Negative: There are no negative comments presented about the vehicle. All comments are either neutral or lean towards positive experiences, suggesting no significant concerns or issues raised by the commentors.
|
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle showcase its appealing aesthetics and enjoyable performance. @Falcon7711 spoke fondly of the vintage 5.0 Mustangs, expressing excitement for a nice example on BAT. The car received praise from @Z282SLO for its sharp LX appearance and choice modifications, complimenting the Weld Racing wheels and GT spoiler. Additionally, @NVGT350 highlighted the polished exhaust finishers and described the car as looking like it means business. The seller, @Kenny33, mentioned that the supercharger added excitement to the otherwise stock ride and provided assurance that the car runs and drives excellently, garnering attention at car shows. Overall, the superficial condition of the vehicle's paint and overall appearance has also been positively emphasized, with @Kenny33 stating it is preserved and original, making it a standout.
Neutral: Several inquiries about the vehicle’s specifics show potential buyer interest and a desire for clarity. @aconsulting asked for dyno numbers and requested more detailed information about paint condition, while @Gallego inquired about modifications to the engine. The seller, @Kenny33, responsively clarified that there are no dyno numbers available but indicated the supercharger could bring the car's stock power output up to approximately 300hp. Many commenters, including @donfuqua and @LongDucDong, shared their enthusiasm without detailing specifics, while @xmotor raised practical questions regarding the functionality of the air conditioning system and cruise control.
Negative: A few concerns regarding the vehicle have been raised. @Kenny33 acknowledged a cold start issue when first starting the car, although he reassured potential buyers that it runs smoothly after that brief moment. @RSAuto pointed out the lack of a boost gauge, questioning whether it might affect the vehicle's performance. @Z282SLO expressed disappointment upon learning that the seller hadn't run through the gears before listing the vehicle, implying that this could affect the car's appeal. While the vehicle appears to be well-maintained and visually intact, these concerns regarding its operation and the seller's engagement with its performance level suggest some lingering hesitance among potential buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the 1996 Porsche 993 Cabriolet as being in outstanding condition, with @hlweeks1 (The Seller) emphasizing the car's immaculate maintenance history, including a major engine service performed at Gold Crest Motorsports only nine months ago. Enthusiasts praise the vehicle's visual appeal and overall quality, with @bobshapiro attesting to its excellent upkeep and clean maintenance records. Many potential buyers express excitement about the vehicle, indicating that it is likely to bring joy to its next owner.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around inquiries about the car's features and conditions, such as the factory hi-fi system and the presence of a wind deflector, with @hlweeks1 (The Seller) confirming existing features and clarifying some specifications. Questions about the Carfax report and its details on any prior damage suggest a desire for transparency and reassurance among potential bidders. @Michaelmorganpaul raises valid concerns about maintenance practices and potential leaks, to which @hlweeks1 responds confidently that the vehicle shows no signs of dripping oil, underscoring the car's readiness for sale.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the car's history, particularly regarding critical aspects from the Carfax report. @Magpie993 questions the accuracy of the report and expresses skepticism regarding the hood's paint condition due to visible tape on the sticker, implying potential issues with the paint job. @Hogheadbob expresses confusion about the car's temperature gauge, mistaking it for an oil pressure gauge, indicating that not all features may be working as expected, which could be a red flag for potential buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: @mick59 expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting the design and comfort of the seats, calling it "very well done." @Svennash (The Seller) noted that despite the limited 1,000 miles added, the vehicle was fun to drive and had tons of power, adding to its positive aspects. @TGL complimented the vehicle, referring to it as a "nice ride," indicating overall satisfaction with its appearance and condition.
Neutral: @W84me asked for clarification regarding specific pictures to better understand the truck's features and requested a driving video, showing a neutral interest in gathering more information. @MTN_PLS provided assistance to @W84me by identifying the location of a feature in the vehicle and complimenting their sleuthing skills, which facilitated a straightforward exchange with the seller without negativity. @Svennash (The Seller) noted that the vehicle had been garaged and recently received paint protection, providing factual updates on the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @AbzRocka raised concerns about the A/C, querying whether it has ever worked and if it simply needs freon, indicating potential issues with the vehicle. @jimrincalifornia questioned the likelihood of the vehicle passing California smog testing, raising doubts about its compliance with regulations. @W84me also inquired about the A/C issue, suggesting that there might be unresolved problems that could affect the vehicle’s appeal.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commentators are impressed with the vehicle's overall condition, describing it as 'very clean' and having a 'great presentation'. @enthusiastic_enthusiast expresses excitement about the car, considering it a beauty and highlighting that it has a smile-filled future ahead of it. There's also a positive response towards the vehicle's unique color, with @Tobyallen appreciating how it wears the color spectacularly. Furthermore, the video overview of the car has received positive feedback, as noted by @Tobyallen who found it both informative and enjoyable without any distracting audio.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions about specific features and details, particularly concerning the color of the car, which seems to have conflicting opinions. @johnnyvett and @mustang1965 believe the color may not match the stated 'Laguna Gray,' while @enthusiastic_enthusiast clarifies that it’s a matter of perspective with different lighting. The vehicle's ride height garners mixed thoughts too, with some believing it sits too high, and others not minding the stance. Furthermore, questions arise concerning the absence of certain features like tilt steering and air conditioning, revealing a need for additional clarification from the seller.
Negative: There are significant concerns regarding the vehicle's aesthetic and mechanical inconsistencies. @jrc58 and @kevinwaspi raise issues with the description of the steering column, pointing out that it’s not a tilt/telescopic type as stated. Additionally, the mismatched paint colors, particularly the hood shade, have drawn criticism from numerous commenters like @mustang1965 and @Vettes33, who assert it detracts from its value. @MattDorram notes issues with the T-tops and @Tobyallen points out paint imperfections and concerns about door fit. Collectively, these comments suggest that while the vehicle has charm, it may feature flaws that need addressing.
|
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is receiving positive remarks from several comments, highlighting its appeal and desirability. @lottacars appreciates the 'nice vette' and acknowledges its service records, while @Paulthepunisher admires the car's power and questions the reason for the quick sale, indicating an interest in the vehicle’s performance. @RumbleAuto resonates with the design, expressing that it represents the pinnacle of Corvette aesthetics. @pmcf29wcpa expresses their interest due to the car's origins and construction at County Corvettes, providing a sense of legitimacy and unique value.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about details and specifications but do not express strong feelings either way. For instance, @jblz asks specific questions regarding mechanical details, showing interest without immediate inclination toward a purchase. @Apache28 (The Seller) clarifies concerning tire and brake conditions and potential service records, portraying a candidness about the car's history and reliability. @FlyinBrian17 seeks reassurance on whether the heads are fixed, indicating his critical approach in understanding the vehicle's mechanics.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the vehicle's history and condition. @pmcf29wcpa mentions that the car has been listed for sale on Facebook Marketplace for a while, suggesting possible issues that might deter potential buyers. There is a hint of skepticism regarding the quick sale, coupled with comments referencing the tires and overall maintenance history, which may not promote confidence among buyers. Additionally, concerns about the front bumper alignment raised by @jblz and @Apache28 suggest that potential cosmetic issues are a point of contention that could affect buyer interest.
|
|
 |
Positive: The comments reveal a strong appreciation for the vehicle's craftsmanship and features, highlighting its status as a one-owner car with great colors and solid service records. @Raffi (The Seller) emphasizes the impressive engineering of the Intermeccanica Speedster, with enhancements like a 2100 cc dual relief case engine and a well-appointed interior featuring leather and custom details. Commentors like @spg356 and @JRR note the appealing historical elements and performance aspects, suggesting that this Speedster is a well-loved and enjoyable vehicle, appealing to driving enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters seek clarification and details about the vehicle, such as @SpeedsterRep's request for specific pictures and @Luv2eat's inquiry about the title year. @Baddogdesmo and @zeres note specific aspects of the car's design and condition, with @Raffi (The Seller) providing detailed explanations regarding the car's specifications, the chassis it was built on, and its correct contours. This exchange of information reflects potential buyers' caution and need for transparency regarding the vehicle's origins and current condition.
Negative: A few comments express skepticism or highlight potential drawbacks of the vehicle. @davethewave911 acknowledges differing opinions on the quality of various replica manufacturers, suggesting that while the Intermeccanica is excellent, other brands like Beck are also top contenders. @Selltopapa describes the driving video as subdued and indicates a preference for certain modern amenities that enhance comfort in replica cars. Lastly, @zeres questions a perceived dent in the car's body, although @Raffi (The Seller) reassures that it is simply the design contour. These reservations indicate a thorough consideration of the vehicle's value and condition.
|
|
 |
Positive: @onefordtech (The Seller) has expressed a strong affection for the car, highlighting its excellent performance and enjoyable driving experience, especially in scenic areas with the top down. The car has been well-maintained, only being in San Diego since new and always kept covered and garaged. The seller notes that it receives frequent compliments for its appearance and mentions the inclusion of a car cover in the sale. Additionally, @onefordtech is open to reinstalling the original suspension springs if the buyer desires a more stock look.
Neutral: Several comments from users like @billhuntga and @RVBat inquire about specific accessories, such as topless photos and a boot cover for the convertible top, indicating interest in the car's functionality and appearance. @CobraDeals and @StagecoachBob are curious about the suspension modifications, asking about the effects of the H & R springs on ride quality and vehicle height. @onefordtech answers these inquiries, providing information about the absence of certain accessories and the characteristics of the modified suspension.
Negative: Some concerns arise from comments asking why the seller is selling the vehicle, with @Romey1963 and @EdFried prompting explanations about the sale. @onefordtech explains that the car is not driven enough since acquiring a Harley Electra Glide and cites space constraints in the garage as further reasons for the sale. Additionally, there is a general concern regarding the absence of daytime running lights, with @1967tiger asking about this feature, and @onefordtech clarifying that it does not have DRL as they were standard only on Canadian versions.
|
|
1969 Chevrolet Camaro COPO L72 427/425 “Tin Soldier” Drag Car
124379N666683
Lot 206287
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's powerful muscle car persona and its rich history. @JFon101231 noted the car's impressive aura, while @srckac62195 highlighted the excitement surrounding the auction, wishing good luck to potential buyers. @69COPO fondly described the car as a true American muscle icon, encouraging fans to test its horsepower. Several others echoed similar sentiments, such as @67Corvetteguy, who appreciated the vehicle's American Racing wheels and overall vibe, and @boaboyoz who praised the sensational build and amazing history. @fldunder908 emphasized the car's nostalgic significance, deserving of tribute like a flyover, while @ssterry heralded it as a monument to the golden age of muscle.
Neutral: Some comments offered informative perspectives on the car's potential suitability for street use and technical specifications. @Z28-T56 inquired whether the vehicle could be licensed for street use, which @69LM1 (The Seller) confirmed with details about necessary modifications. @Tripout provided insights into the car's mechanical details, like the original components and recent refreshment, reflecting a collaborative effort among experts to preserve the vehicle's legacy. Additionally, @micriclarson and @C1lover asked about performance metrics and technical specifications, contributing to a deeper understanding of the car's capabilities.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback, there were a few concerns regarding the vehicle's suitability for street use and the risks associated with its power. @Vtec4ever referred to the car as 'damn cool' but implied a level of caution in its street legality. @C1lover humorously acknowledged the potential trouble one might encounter with law enforcement, indicating that the car's power could be a liability. @HAPPY expressed disappointment that the car did not sell in a previous listing, suggesting market uncertainties.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Classicact (The Seller) expresses regret about selling the beautiful Yukon, assuring interested buyers they won't be disappointed. Several comments reflect confidence in the vehicle's quality, with @levenge highlighting the Yukon as a reliable and well-regarded option among various SUVs. The seller shares that the vehicle has been well-maintained, emphasizing its solid performance and condition, with all heated seats functioning properly and a recent tune-up completed.
Neutral: Various inquiries about the vehicle's features and condition were made by potential buyers, such as @heaps asking about the third seat and @yardbird221 inquiring about average miles per gallon. @NORTHER discussed the feasibility of swapping the captain's chairs for a bench seat, while @scoper69 wanted clarification on the air conditioning and any leaks. The seller provided detailed responses, contributing to a constructive dialogue about the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns arose regarding the vehicle's air ride system, with @domlil mentioning it might not be functioning properly. @vamax pointed out that Autoride is a significant selling point and suggested diagnosing the issue before the auction closes. Although @Classicact (The Seller) maintained confidence in the vehicle's stability and maintenance, there was acknowledgment of the air ride not working, which could potentially deter some buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: @NormalNorm notes that the CT70s are beautiful and appreciated the concept of families riding them together, highlighting their popularity. @STSH (The Seller) also shares a personal story about the reliability of an early CT70 they found, noting that it still runs well after years of use, which emphasizes the durability and enduring charm of these bikes. Additionally, @NormalNorm praises Honda's engineering, suggesting that the CT70s hold a special place in the hearts of motorcycle enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @mbtech208 and @NormalNorm, express a sense of nostalgia regarding the production of the CT70, with @mbtech208 recalling his surprise to find that Honda continued to produce the model into the mid-90s. @NormalNorm provides historical context, mentioning the manufacturing timeline from 1969 to 1994, which adds depth to the discussion. This commentary reflects a blend of interest and curiosity about the motorcycle's history and production decisions.
Negative: @NormalNorm critiques the later production models of the CT70, suggesting that they were past their prime and did not sell as well as their earlier counterparts. He suspects that the revival of production in the 1990s was driven by leftover parts or marketing strategies rather than genuine demand. This sentiment indicates some disappointment in the newer models compared to the original versions, which may not receive the same level of affection from collectors and enthusiasts.
|
|
 |
Positive: @eliaswex (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a "dream" car, emphasizing its perfection and original condition. He highlights that he's only selling it because he lacks garage space after purchasing a 1956 car. He reassures potential buyers about the car's functionality, mentioning that it has no rust and has always been garaged in a controlled environment. @eliaswex expresses that driving the car is an absolute pleasure, having taken it for long drives to car shows without encountering any issues.
Neutral: Commenters ask for additional details about the vehicle, such as the age of the tires, potential rust issues, and whether it has had any transmission problems, particularly when engaging in reverse. @88LX offers advice regarding maintenance, specifically on changing the PTU gear oil and upgrading brakes to enhance performance. Other questions include whether the moon roof is fully functional and if there are USB ports or Bluetooth connectivity.
Negative: Several commenters express concerns about specific aspects of the vehicle. @abuuwais questions the reason for the car's sale after just a year, while @Skisworld raises potential issues regarding battery life and @Dangermiller asks about phone connectivity options that may not be included. @joliver3 points out inconsistencies in the description regarding the wheel size, indicating a correction was needed. These comments highlight some apprehension and uncertainty among potential buyers regarding the condition and features of the car.
|
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg: Great looking 300ZX and welcomes back. Best wishes. @Pboffy: Ohmygosh, your cold start video brought back such happy memories! From taking the car cover off to starting the engine and watching the digital display come to life—-you allowed me to relive the joy of buying/driving my white ‘84 ZX, which I kept for 10 years! The electronics package had so many extras that were ahead of their time. Thanks for the great video and photos of your beautiful RED ZED. @zdoctor: This car hits all the marks for the perfect weekend toy and I love the color. @samhulse: I had this same car in 1989 and jumped on this last year, with the intent of getting it ready for its 40th anniversary. There are absolutely zero issues at this time. I would drive this car to any buyer, anywhere and run the AC the entire time.
Neutral: @samhulse: @Todd C will try to get some taken tonight. @samhulse: I have no idea what areas were repainted and will take photos. The car has been to a Z specialist auto shop for maintenance and neither reported any visible rust. @samhulse: Requested pictures to follow today, and driving video will be uploaded soon. I switched the battery to one that was the proper size and believe the ceramicoat was worth every penny. @84FLH: Any chance for an in-car driving vid, in town and on the highway?
Negative: @FatKat: @Seller: Hey, Sam, why are you selling after owning only one year? Is there any issues with the car? @Pacmansr: Can you add photos of the repainted areas and where the paint is cracking and the bumper. Is there any rust in the car? @HeavyTank77: I’ve done an oil change on one of these…wish I had a Z specialist do it instead. What a pain in the petunias! @84FLH: So…no driving vid?
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciate the vehicle's unique customized features, highlighting its rugged aesthetic and preparedness for adventures. @scott4tel expressed love for the Bronco, comparing it to the iconic 'Shaggin’ Waggin' from a classic movie, while @brainfog likened it to a 'Mad Max Bronco' that needs armor. The customization work done, such as the Kevlar spray finish and Smittybilt winch, was recognized as a substantial investment over $12,000 as noted by @Jimlerbs (The Seller), making it appealing to those who appreciate personalized vehicles.
Neutral: Some comments provided neutral observations about the vehicle's condition and modifications. @GHUA pointed out that the mismatched fender flares are not an issue, and @Icb33 humorously remarked about being there for just the comments. @Toccoa noted the irony in the top being better suited for the vehicle given its extreme mods, while @Jimlerbs (The Seller) reassured potential buyers about the removability of the roof panels, stating they are easily manageable by one person. @redbull1790 praised its appeal from Dallas to LA, describing it as a 'supermodel.'
Negative: Conversely, some comments expressed clear dissatisfaction with the vehicle's appearance and modifications. @Assam bluntly stated 'KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!', while @Jackz4 claimed it looks like what remains after a fire. @NBates90 found the paint job unappealing, likening it to something from a Batman movie. Moreover, questions raised by @SJBOTT about paint thickness indicated concerns over the quality of the new finish, prompting @Jimlerbs (The Seller) to explain that the texture of the paint may complicate standard measurements.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Epicstaxis appreciates that this 1985 BMW 635CSi does not have the common blue interior seen in many similar models, highlighting its unique color scheme. @piezopaul considers the color to be great, while @Samhunter calls it one of the cleanest examples of the 635CSi available, expressing confidence that the future owner will be very happy. @wem5310 also remarks positively, labeling it a "great shark." @Caffeinated25 praises the quality of the seller's walkaround video and refers to the car as a great looking shark, maintaining an optimistic tone towards the auction.
Neutral: Comments reveal a mix of general curiosity and specific inquiries about the vehicle's condition. @TXDesFox asks several detailed questions about the car's features and maintenance records, which indicates cautious interest. @Spokayman and @shoejohn express appreciation for the seller's replies, seeking additional receipts for work conducted on the car and clarification regarding the recent odometer readings. @Halallaf (The Seller) addresses these inquiries by providing information about the paint job and recent maintenance, aiming to reassure potential bidders about the car's condition.
Negative: Concerns arise around the car's mileage as indicated by @KENARDO who compares past smog check records and infers that the car may have been sitting for an extended period. This raises doubts about the reliability of the odometer readings, leading to questions about possible intermittent issues with the odometer, as mentioned by both @shoejohn and @KENARDO. @TXDesFox and @KENARDO emphasize the importance of understanding the vehicle's complete maintenance history and functioning features before committing to a bid, which signals a level of mistrust regarding the claims made by the seller.
|
|
 |
Positive: @anthonyjp expresses excitement and invites the new owner to enjoy the vehicle, indicating a fun ownership experience. Many commenters acknowledge the unique condition of the vehicle with only 13 miles, with @BillyBandit expressing disbelief that he could resist driving it more often. @gf2020 comments that despite the distance from their home, they would drive this car confidently without guilt, highlighting its appeal as a worthwhile drive rather than just a showpiece.
Neutral: @Nina1956 raises a question about the car's low mileage and history, prompting @scribnermotors (The Seller) to explain that the vehicle has transitioned between private collections, maintaining its pristine condition. @RoverNut and @PP0001 discuss the implications of driving a car that has sat for several years, with @PP0001 sharing his break-in process experiences, indicating that some owners approach these maintenance aspects differently.
Negative: @BillyBandit doubts the credibility of the 13-mile claim, suggesting that any owner would have enjoyed the vehicle much more actively. @PP0001 also questions the vehicle's condition in the auction photos, wondering about the potential leftover shipping blocks, indicative of oversight during its time in storage. Additionally, @scribnermotors (The Seller) acknowledges issues raised by other commenters regarding the car's prep, reflecting skepticism from potential buyers about the vehicle's handling and upkeep.
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the 1987 Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet, noting its beauty and excellent condition. @Msak described it as a "beautiful car," while @Dino913 called it "absolutely beautiful" and highlighted the joy of driving such a car on summer days. @GDogg referred to it as a "spectacular" Cabriolet, complementing its appearance with the Whale tail. @Kdawg7 praised its performance, stating that it "hums like a 911," reinforcing the vehicle's desirability among fans of the brand.
Neutral: The seller, @Harbormotorcars, provided key details about the vehicle, including that it has only 27,000 original miles and features the sought-after G50 5-speed transmission. They also mentioned that the car is currently receiving new tires and has a history of maintenance and garage-keeping. Various commenters have inquired about specifics like service records, startup videos, and details on tire wear, indicating a genuine interest in ensuring the car's upkeep and reliability before making a bid.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition and maintenance records. @997.2GT3RS noted the different rear tires and questioned the maintenance history, reflecting apprehension about potential issues. Users like @SWET expressed dissatisfaction over the lack of cold start and driving videos, as well as incomplete service documentation, suggesting that more transparency is needed to reassure potential buyers about the car's condition. Furthermore, @Chino2016 raised questions about damage to the rear plastic window and the feasibility of replacing it without replacing the top, highlighting a need for further clarification.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Horns1983 expresses enthusiasm, emphasizing that owning this vehicle is essential for a complete collection, while @newcarpro describes it as 'eye candy beauty,' highlighting its aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: @dostler inquires whether there have been any changes to the vehicle since the previous listing, indicating an interest in the car's current condition. Additionally, @oaibob provides some historical context about the vehicle's model year, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. Similarly, @Bmarcum notes the potential for a quick resale and expresses interest in the situation, while @88WhaleTail clarifies that it is not a resale, referencing previous auction details.
Negative: @SSBN629 points out a potential issue with the left headlight housing, suggesting it may not match the vehicle's body, which raises concerns about cosmetic discrepancies. @vetoholic queries about the meaning of a 'planned non-operational title' in California, and @Gloccamora criticizes the previous owner for not properly upgrading the motor, implying that the vehicle may not meet expected performance standards.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetics and performance features. @mr_smee noted it as one of the best-looking inexpensive cars of the era. @Baronvonbrutus described it as beautiful and praised the 318 engine for being responsive and dependable. @Dukekjj brought attention to the original interior, suggesting that it would look even better if upgraded back to the classic orange plaid material. These sentiments reflect a strong appreciation for the car's design and potential.
Neutral: There are several inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition and specifications. @embrym asked about the differential, while @ldirienzo sought clarification on the type of transmission, to which @maldridgeks (The Seller) confirmed it is a numbers-matching A904. The seller also shared details about previous ownership and the minimal mileage since restoration, asserting that the metal work performed was minor and of good quality. Additionally, @KSGuy inquired about the car's reliability for a long drive, and the seller confidently replied that there are no concerns based on their experience driving it home.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the quality of the bodywork. @stevesimpson4375 pointed out visible patches from welding that may not suggest the restoration work was as old as claimed. He urged caution about the bodywork and mentioned areas that appeared to be poorly finished. @maldridgeks (The Seller) defended the restoration by citing discussions with the previous owner's family, though he acknowledged he could not provide pre-restoration photos. These criticisms indicate potential doubts regarding the car's overall quality.
|
|
 |
Positive: @thetalisman124 praised the car as "absolute perfection," and @Caymanorcarrera found it beautiful, expressing enthusiasm for its listing. @chrismseely called it the "perfect 50's Triumph," while @pigman noted the beautiful refurbishment and exceptional color. @Backroader mentioned that the car is stunning in person, stating that photos do not do it justice. @j.p. shared a similar sentiment, highlighting the car's glow and commitment to detail. Other commenters echoed this sentiment, with @desneyd expressing a desire to own the car if circumstances allowed, and @HeroDriver complimenting its sharpness and modifications.
Neutral: The seller, @britauto, provided a detailed description of the vehicle, representing it for a friend and promising to provide further information during the listing process. He has been responsive to inquiries, sharing videos and restoration updates, including the driving and cold start videos. Furthermore, the seller clarified the car's model year and ensured potential buyers about the authenticity of parts used in the vehicle's restoration. @BillsTR and @Arnage also contributed technical information about the car's components and modifications, adding a layer of expertise to the auction discussion.
Negative: Some commenters expressed specific preferences that differed from the current state of the car. For instance, @HeroDriver critiqued the black wire wheels, believing they detracted from the car's overall appearance and suggested alternatives that would enhance its look. @pjb317 made a request for a redo of the driving video to eliminate the music, indicating a desire for a purer representation of the driving experience. Additionally, @Herford suggested the removal of a tire from display, hinting at concerns over aesthetics or functionality.
|
|
 |
Positive: @bosshoss3406pack expresses a strong preference for the Rangoon Red color, ranking it as his favorite next to Viper Red, indicating a positive sentiment towards the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle. Commenters like @chrome693 compliment the vehicle's attractiveness, describing it as a "Nice looking Bird" and wishing the seller good luck with the auction, which further reinforces the overall appreciation for its design. Overall, comments reflect enthusiasm and admiration for the vehicle's appearance and significance.
Neutral: @Zhawk77, the seller, welcomes potential bidders and expresses willingness to answer questions about the vehicle, fostering a sense of engagement with the audience. @1996MBZ and @caozman participate in a brief exchange about the terminology used in describing part of the vehicle, specifically regarding 'spats' and fender skirts. This interaction demonstrates an interest in understanding the terminology related to the vehicle's components, contributing to a neutral discussion.
Negative: There are no negative comments directly related to the vehicle; however, the question raised by @chrome693 about the term 'spats' suggests a potential area of confusion or misunderstanding about vehicle terminology. This highlights a small gap in general knowledge that could affect some bidders' perceptions or enthusiasm regarding the auction. Nonetheless, overall sentiments remain positive, with the focus primarily on admiration and curiosity rather than criticism.
|
|
 |
Positive: @DasMoto praised the bike for its great patina and attractive gray color, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. Other users like @Nate and @originalbob echoed positive sentiments, noting the bike's character as a survivor and an interesting project for enthusiasts. @Nate referred to it as a "diamond in the rough", suggesting it holds potential for restoration and enjoyment, while @glorybe expressed enthusiasm for taking on the bike as an adventurous project to ride across states, indicating a willingness to invest effort into bringing it back to life.
Neutral: Several commenters, such as @BeemerNut and @Ant5842, posed questions regarding the bike's maintenance history and requested additional photos, particularly in natural daylight to assess its actual condition. @JackPiner shared insights on the bike's model specifications, pointing out features and potential areas for renovation. The seller, @GenauAutoWerks, confirmed they would provide additional footage and photos as requested by the community, enhancing transparency about the bike's condition.
Negative: On the downside, comments from users like @Nate questioned the overall condition and service history, noting signs of wear and concerns about the bike possibly having been superficially maintained. @Apathyfern remarked that the absence of riding or starting videos raised doubts about the bike's functionality, implying it could be a non-operational vehicle. Additionally, @relrrt11 noted that while the initial photos looked good, they didn’t accurately portray the bike's true condition, emphasizing the need for honest representation in the auction.
|
|
 |
Positive: @leesdiamonds praised the vehicle for its factory build quality and detailed refurbishment. @bal4833 expressed excitement about the car's racing potential, mentioning how it could be a lot of fun. @philacarguy described it as a nicely prepared car with a rich history, noting its rarity in the vintage racing scene and its competitiveness in under 2-liter production groups. @szedko commented on the car being a wonderfully built and economical option for buyers. @TigerGary highlighted its connection to famous racers like Carl Christiansen and Ken Miles, emphasizing its heritage and race-ready state.
Neutral: @1963alpineracer, the seller, provided detailed insights into the car's history, noting various modifications and the complexity behind its ownership. He acknowledged the vehicle's mixed parts and discussed the documentation efforts that aimed to clarify its lineage. @austinhealer raised interesting points about the chassis identifiers, while @artyparty and @1963alpineracer further debated on the originality of the components and their historical significance.
Negative: @artyparty raised concerns about the lack of original parts and questioned the classifications applied to the vehicle as a period race car, pointing out several upgraded components that may detract from its authenticity. @hambone4857 mentioned the entertainment value in discussing originality while stressing the importance of its functionality as a race car. @szedko criticized the brake system, asking if it was sufficient for racing conditions, while @austinhealer commented on legal concerns regarding the history and identity of the vehicle.
|
|
 |
Positive: @JCyrus57 praised the vehicle's impressive build and color combination, expressing enthusiasm for its aesthetics while wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @E.Murray described the vehicle as a 'cool rig' and expressed a desire to own it if only they had the space, showcasing a strong interest in the vehicle's design and appeal. Overall, these comments highlight the vehicle's appealing design and the hard work put into creating it.
Neutral: @Vintage_steel acknowledged the obvious effort in the build, specifically mentioning the SBC engine as a perfect fit for such rigs, despite his disappointment in the dropped ball concerning the 'wrangler graphics.' @tonymoke (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the soft top hardware, confirming it comes with a bikini top but no hard or soft tops. @BTang inquired about the 'wrangler' lettering, seeking clarification on its nature, showing engagement with the specifics of the vehicle while awaiting further details about driving performance.
Negative: @MaxsEagles expressed a bit of confusion regarding the inclusion of hard or soft tops with the vehicle, indicating a concern over the available options. There was a slight critique from @Vintage_steel regarding the aesthetics of the lettering, implying it detracts from the overall look of the vehicle. These comments reflect a level of disappointment regarding certain features and details that could affect potential buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed high appreciation for the vehicle, with @jamesbehel referring to it as a "General Lee pickup truck" and stating he loves it. @Linkj described it as a "great looking truck" and requested additional photos of the interiors. @boaboyoz enthusiastically called the F-100 "dynamite" and commended its color scheme, while @VonMagnusson praised the honest presentation of the truck, suggesting it would do well in the market. Overall, the overall sentiment towards the truck's aesthetic appeal and presentation was very positive among potential bidders and onlookers.
Neutral: The seller, @FirehouseVintage, provided a detailed overview of the truck's condition and history, noting it as a survivor with most cosmetic work done. The truck has a mid-70s date code 460 engine, and it was highlighted that while the underside is untouched to demonstrate its solidity, the truck is ready for use as is. There was a technical query by @Todd_Z about the transfer case, which raised some discussion regarding its configuration, with @Cammergalaxie confirming the original equipment. This indicates that while the truck is presented as a sound vehicle, there are still some clarifications being sought by potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about specific aspects of the truck's condition. @LouisTom noted an issue with the alignment of the rear bumper, while @bish285 suggested it might indicate past minor accidents. @Wheels4life pointed out the need for the listing to clarify details about the transfer case after @Todd_Z's comment questioned the compatibility of the mentioned specifications. Additionally, @fordcrewcaba suggested the truck would benefit from larger tires, hinting that while the truck is generally viewed positively, some enhancements and corrections could improve its appeal.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, praising its design, engineering, and historical significance. @air4sale80 mentioned being surprised by the inclusion of an onboard voice advisory system, highlighting its unique features. @Popovich, who has a similar model, believes that the bike's originality and low mileage make it a sought-after item, potentially fetching over $20K. @Caymanorcarrera called it an excellent Airhead, emphasizing it as the first fully faired production motorcycle. @Tracman noted its timeless engineering and advanced design, asserting that it has a place in history as a pioneer of the sport touring class. Overall, the vehicle is seen as a well-engineered piece of motorcycle history that many enthusiasts appreciate.
Neutral: Several comments reflect on the bike's low mileage and historical context rather than its immediate appeal. @tedious inquired about the possibility of viewing the bike in person, signaling an interest but not a firm commitment to purchasing. @dicker911 shared a personal anecdote about the bike's significance and its historical connection to famous owners, creating a narrative around the vehicle without explicitly endorsing it. @Sumser pointed out the bike's potential for daily use, implying that its engineering is robust yet wishing it fell within their budget. @Motogrotto observed the bike's visual appeal and connection to a specific community of motorcycle enthusiasts, diminishing its status as a mere collector's item.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the bike's very low mileage, with commenters like @paul1cart expressing disappointment that it had only been ridden briefly over nearly five decades. @dicker911 echoed this sentiment, wishing that more miles had been covered, as the bikes are designed for long-distance touring. The skepticism about the future value retention was also present in @jeff61's comment regarding how well these motorcycles would fare in the long run. Although @Bobsbikes attempted to defend low mileage as a result of proper care, acknowledging it as a worthy custodianship rather than usage, there’s an underlying sentiment that the bike’s potential isn't fully realized due to its limited usage.
|
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has been positively received for its aesthetic appeal, particularly highlighted by @GregP1962 who notes the attractive rear quarter vents on the 65-66 fastback, and @Henagej who praises the overall quality of the work, albeit with some reservations about the taillights. The seller, @smoke1980, emphasizes that the car was built with no expense spared for the SEMA 2014, with a build cost of $300K and a current insured value of $160.8K, which speaks to its desirability and quality. Additionally, the vehicle has only been driven a minimal amount of miles since its build, making it a low-mileage classic car, further adding to its appeal.
Neutral: Some background information reveals that the vehicle is essentially a build using new parts with a basic frame, as stated by @smoke1980. There were some inquiries about the car's original coding, whether it was a T, C, A, or K code model, and how those designations impact the vehicle now that it has been heavily modified. @ewh49 raises an interesting consideration on the relevance of its original status given the extensive customizations, supported by @Thomas54 who shares his own experiences with modified early Mustangs.
Negative: There have been some criticisms regarding various aspects of the vehicle. @PAGSDIII701 humorously mentioned the sound of the exhaust, comparing it unfavorably to a small, less powerful engine. @Henagej expressed concerns about the legality and visibility of the taillight modifications, indicating they may not be bright enough for safety on the road. Additionally, @DozerDude found some aspects of the vehicle's description to be strange, reflecting skepticism about its specifications and claims. This mixed reception highlights that while some appreciate the modifications, others remain cautious or critical about their execution.
|
|
Fuel-Injected, Supercharged 355-Powered 1947 Hudson Super Six Pickup
17854982
Lot 206212
Private Party
 |
Positive: @David_P appreciates the uniqueness of the Hudson pickup, highlighting its unusual treatment and the intriguing choice to modify it into a street rod. This perspective contributes to the vehicle's charm, appealing to those who value customization and distinctive designs.
Neutral: @Bannatyne seeks clarification regarding a specific aspect of the vehicle's title, questioning why it carries a commercial note. This indicates an interest in understanding the vehicle's history and any implications this might have for potential buyers or enthusiasts.
Negative:
|
|
 |
Positive: @Asdspeed (The Seller) has provided an enthusiastic introduction to the listing, emphasizing the exceptional condition of the 2025 Land Cruiser, suggesting that it could be placed back on the showroom floor without any signs of use. Users such as @BabyD69 expressed their love for the vehicle, indicating satisfaction with their current Land Cruiser and the enjoyable experience it offers. @toadsalesman and @Pistol_Pete_1 shared their positive experiences with similar vehicles, reinforcing the notion that this model has ample power and is a worthy investment.
Neutral: Several users sought clarification on the vehicle's specifics, including @Y2K911, who asked about potential chips or damages from its mileage. @GrabberBlue and others discussed mixed feelings about Toyota's recent push towards turbocharged engines, hinting that some in the community are uncertain about the direction of the brand and the model's pricing compared to what is available at dealerships. Discussion also touched on reserve prices and the vehicle's status concerning California smog regulations, with @Asdspeed (The Seller) noting all necessary compliance was already met.
Negative: Concerns emerged regarding the pricing of the vehicle, with commenters like @Cbates69 and @classicar79 suggesting that the asking price may be overstated, considering current market depreciation and comparable new vehicles available at lower costs. @bauer3 questioned the motives behind selling such a new vehicle, implying potential issues with the original owner. @LawDog's inquiry about a possible windshield chip raised doubts about the vehicle's condition, despite @Asdspeed (The Seller) minimizing the concern by describing it as merely a spec of dust.
|
|
 |
Positive: @BloodyHell admires the vehicle, describing it as reminiscent of classic shows like The Rockford Files and French Connection, emphasizing its portrayal in roadside scenes. @Joes124 expresses excitement about the car's features, noting the Ram Air, power seats, and fold-down backseat, while also complimenting its appearance. @Lidpainter (The Seller) shares motivation behind the car's looks, indicating it mirrors a 1969 aesthetic, and @Robswheels6d5o also praises the beauty of the car, relating it to a past ownership experience.
Neutral: @Lidpainter (The Seller) responds to questions from @Jprobisheaux regarding the bumper and power seat, explaining that the bumper is original to a 400 model and noting some issues with the power seat functionality. @Drtnjj requests additional video footage of the car in action for better assessment, to which @Lidpainter confirms they added cold start videos but notes some issues with the sound quality and video formatting.
Negative: @Lidpainter (The Seller) admits that the power seat struggles and operates slowly, expressing uncertainty about its exact problems. They also mention complications with the video quality of the driving footage, noting poor sound and rattling, which could detract from the viewing experience. Overall, concerns regarding the vehicle's mechanics and the quality of promotional material have been raised.
|
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received praise for its stunning color combination and overall aesthetic appeal. Commenters like @snowtire and @Atom0096 highlighted the beautiful Twilight Blue shade, expressing that it enhances the car's elegance. Many enthusiasts, including @GreenLine, referenced the car's unique engineering pedigree as it was developed in part by Lotus, adding to its exotic appeal and desirability. Owners like @snowtire share their positive personal experiences, noting the joy it brings and its standout presence at car meets, often drawing more admiration than more traditional supercars.
Neutral: Some comments reflected curiosity about the vehicle's specifications and history, such as @sweetleon asking about the battery replacement and @tekkno inquiring about the car's range. @AynRand (The Seller) provided clarifications regarding the vehicle’s upgrades and battery life, discussing its maintenance and performance stats. On the aesthetic front, @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 pointed out that while the color is nice, it might be considered bland compared to more vibrant options, initiating a discussion around whether such variations were custom ordered or standard showroom offerings.
Negative: However, there were concerns regarding the battery performance, with commenters like @sweetleon expressing skepticism over why a new battery was required after limited use. There were whispers of doubt about the elegance of the color. @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 mentioned that the color combination seemed common among Roadsters, implying it lacked uniqueness. Additionally, questions were raised about the range after the R80 upgrade, with some commenters expressing disappointment or confusion regarding the vehicle's performance metrics compared to expectations.
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed enthusiasm about the unique features and vintage appeal of the vehicle. @JNDewes appreciates the rarity of the truck, noting its good condition and implying that it has probably been well-preserved due to its limited exposure to harsh Midwest winters. @tlcamg thinks it's a cool vehicle that can be enjoyed as is or improved for a more polished look, recognizing that it has a historical context that adds to its charm and character. @MikeDTaz encourages saving such a unique truck, highlighting its nostalgic value.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a neutral stance, focusing on the truck's specifications and historical background. @oldcop152 provides detailed explanations regarding the vehicle's features, such as its manufacture in Fremont and its condition, being free from salt damage. The discussion about the truck's front clip, as noted by @broodie, indicates a common practice of the time regarding repairs, showing an understanding of the vehicle's history without passing strong judgment.
Negative: On the downside, some comments hint at the truck's imperfections. @lowandslow12's mention of the first bid suggests a cautious approach to the auction process, possibly indicating uncertainty about the vehicle's current market value. Additionally, there is a vague implication from @broodie regarding the truck's past issues, suggesting that it may have had body damage that necessitated changes, which could be seen as a potential red flag for buyers considering the vehicle.
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express excitement and admiration for the 2021 Quadro Sherp Pro XT. @GCEA (The Seller) highlights its impressive capabilities, emphasizing that it's built to tackle nearly any challenge. @boaboyoz and @maynardbass share their appreciation for the vehicle's presence on Bring a Trailer (BaT), with @maynardbass joking about the detailing efforts that went into the vehicle's presentation. @Viper0311 even shares specific use cases like duck hunting and ice fishing, illustrating the vehicle's outdoor versatility.
Neutral: Several comments focus on practical aspects of the vehicle, such as its fuel capacity. @scm212 notes that each tire has a built-in auxiliary fuel tank, totaling over 86 gallons, which adds to the Sherp's functionality. @GCEA (The Seller) engages with users, providing information and showing enthusiasm for the auction while assuring the quality of the vehicle with upcoming videos to demonstrate its performance. Additionally, @nicksatkovich offers services related to the vehicle, indicating a supportive community around the Sherp.
Negative: Some comments raise questions and concerns about the vehicle's technology. @richardlava queries the "CAN-BUS FAILURE" message seen on the dash, which @GCEA (The Seller) explains as potentially arising from the vehicle not being fully powered on. Other commenters, like @onlyhonda4me, recommend improvements, suggesting the vehicle could use a bit more rubber on the tires. Overall, while there are reservations, they do not majorly detract from the overall positivity around the vehicle.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Gary_T1 remarked on the neat appearance of the bike, expressing a desire to ride it. @Honestlen shared enthusiasm for owning the bike, describing it as a lovely tribute to the Honda brand and highlighting his wife's enjoyment of its aesthetics. @bobdog noted the bike's impressive engineering, specifically mentioning its eight tiny valves and jokingly suggesting it could be a decorative piece in a living room, indicating a level of admiration for its design. @Dundertaker humorously described it as sounding like a vehicle from The Jetsons, emphasizing its exotic appeal.
Neutral: @ukguy inquired about the documentation and videos of the bike's operation, which @sodo-moto (The Seller) addressed by planning to share a cold-start video and mentioned the bike's specifications concerning speed limitations and potential modifications. Additionally, @Slam105 expressed his aim of owning a street-legal version of the Dream 50, engaging in conversation about its different models and prices. Overall, the dialogue reflected a shared interest in the bike's features and variations, contributed by various commentors proposing insights and exchanging information.
Negative: @Slam105, reflecting on his age, expressed regret about possibly never fulfilling his dream of owning the bike due to financial limitations. He humorously detailed his situation, emphasizing how he had to sell his previous motorcycle and could barely manage living expenses. @flal79 mentioned issues with a friend's non-working engine, highlighting potential drawbacks and challenges related to the bike's maintenance and availability of parts, thus voicing some concerns that were echoed subtly throughout discussions of its scarcity and value.
|
|
 |
Positive: @NickW1 highlighted that the Mini Cooper S is a nice clean car equipped with the desirable Chrono Package, which appeals to Mini enthusiasts. @Nomas21 called the car beautiful and inquired about the timing chain maintenance, indicating an interest in the vehicle's upkeep. @iakllc (The Seller) confirmed it has been inspected and only required an oil change, emphasizing the vehicle's excellent condition and the absence of issues, suggesting confidence in its reliability.
Neutral: @Vinnypooh asked about the inclusion of 2 key fobs, to which @atxwakeboard pointed out Photo Number 160 showing both keys. @atxwakeboard also noted the limited Carfax service records but confirmed that the previous owner has performed timely oil changes and addressed the oil pan plug. @Nomas21 raised a question regarding the vehicle's reliability as a commuter car for long daily drives, showcasing a practical consideration for potential buyers.
Negative: @atxwakeboard expressed skepticism about the vehicle's maintenance history, observing that only oil changes were documented in the available service records. @iakllc acknowledged the lack of records but reassured that the Mini is well-maintained, as supported by its current clean condition and that it has been owned by only one person over 18 years. However, this absence of detailed service documentation raised concerns about the overall mechanical state of the vehicle among potential buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting its beautiful design, impressive build quality, and modern performance features. @MichaelRyerson described it as a "Beautiful driver," while @Gary_T1 praised the chassis and suspension work, noting that it handles like a modern car. @manifesto2000 called it an "Absolutely spectacular offering," and @Mike_Breinin deemed it "stupendously awesome," indicating the car inspires admiration and enthusiasm among enthusiasts. Many commenters, including @Rlhfromnc, who saw it in person, emphasized the flawless paint and the overall execution of the build, confirming that it looks even better in real life.
Neutral: Neutral comments often included inquiries about specific features and capabilities of the vehicle, reflecting a desire for more information without strong positive or negative sentiment. For instance, @Aarussjr asked if side curtains were included, while @lgerg inquired about the presence of windows or a hard top. @Thedrummondcollection sought clarification on the air conditioning system, indicating an interest in the car's functionality. @Howard62 raised questions about the functionality of the gauges and security features, suggesting potential concerns but also engagement with the seller for answers.
Negative: Negative comments were sparse, with few individuals expressing reservations. @NH_Quattro mentioned not typically being a fan of early C1s but still appreciating this particular build, hinting at a general reluctance toward certain models. Additionally, @ACN968 suggested that it might be a good candidate for a different engine swap, implying a lack of full satisfaction with the current configuration. These comments reflect a cautious approach rather than outright criticism, indicating an overall positive reception with few reservations.
|
|
572-Powered 1971 Chevrolet Chevelle Malibu Sport Coupe 5-Speed
136371R105767
Lot 206310
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle, with @RVolberg noting that the combination of a big block engine and big tires equates to significant value. @mh187 called it truly impressive, while @CZ_cars is eagerly awaiting a driving video to see it in action. @djwann added that the car has the potential to exceed $65,000 in value with the right enhancements, and @ssterry complimented its appearance and performance specifications, noting the substantial torque and the impressive modifications made to handle the engine's power.
Neutral: The seller, @Thrall23, provided detailed information regarding the vehicle's specifications and modifications, including the installation of a new 572 big block engine with high-performance components designed for drag racing. They addressed questions about whether certain features, such as the horn and windshield wipers, are functional, confirming that all electronics are working, although some components may be missing or uninstalled. Additionally, the seller informed potential buyers about the car's history, modifications, and the performance capabilities, indicating it can drive well in various conditions.
Negative: Concerns were raised by several users about the vehicle's performance under high-temperature conditions. @badboat25 highlighted that the engine runs hot, questioning if this is a significant issue. @fessladoux and @Hammer107 also inquired about specific measurements and the vehicle's temperature management, with the seller acknowledging the engine's tendency to run warm in hot weather but assuring that cooling measures are in place. Moreover, @ssterry mentioned potential issues with headlight installation, which the seller confirmed are functional but may require additional attention.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many positive remarks highlight the 2013 Ferrari 458 Spider as a well-maintained and beautifully specced car. The @JLCommodities, the seller, emphasizes the unique features and options of the vehicle, including the highly coveted carbon seats and advanced exhaust system. Several comments from users like @GNH and @GDogg appreciate the aesthetics and driving experience, noting the car's blend of luxury and performance, while others show strong interest, indicating the anticipation for how high the auction may go due to its exceptional condition and modifications. Even longtime users like @Way2Fast and @Akula express admiration for the successful track record of the seller and their clear passion for the vehicle.
Neutral: There are several neutral inquiries and comments throughout the auction regarding the car's specifics, such as its mileage, service history, and inspection details. For example, @Carenthusiast94566 asked about the cold start video and close-up shots of the control buttons for condition verification. Another user, @SerottaD, queried if the Ferrari would pass smog in California, while others discussed the addition of aftermarket components like the exhaust. These comments indicate a balanced assessment of the car, reflecting both curiosity and a thorough consideration for potential buyers trying to understand the car's condition and performance capabilities before placing bids.
Negative: Some negative remarks focus on concerns about the mileage and the impact of previous minor incidents on the car's value. Users like @Mason320 express that miles do matter in the assessment of collector cars, suggesting that the car's higher mileage could detract from its appeal for some collectors. Other comments criticize the seller's lengthy descriptions as excessive and potentially overwhelming for a standard auction format. While the seller's enthusiasm is clear, a few users suggest a more concise approach might better serve the auction experience. Overall, these comments echo a sentiment of caution among potential buyers regarding mileage and modification concerns.
|
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a lot of enthusiasm for the 997.1 C4S cabriolet, with @GDogg highlighting its aesthetic appeal alongside @boaboyoz who described it as a fantastic specimen and wished the seller good luck with the auction. @GaryRoach contributed a detailed observation about the unique Dark Olive Metallic color, admiring its beauty under sunlight, and emphasizing its rarity. Commenters such as @DoubleTrouble and @Eblesson also expressed appreciation for the stunning color combination, although @Eblesson noted some cosmetic issues that might need attention, adding a touch of realism to the excitement.
Neutral: The seller, @Elanone, remained actively engaged in the comments, responding to various inquiries about the vehicle's history and condition. For instance, they clarified the status of the IMS bearing, confirming it features the upgraded version from the factory. They also encouraged potential bidders to reach out with questions and assured them that their team was working to provide timely responses. This proactive communication seemed to contribute positively to the auction experience, creating a sense of transparency regarding the vehicle's details.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns or skepticism about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @davepatchen questioned the need for a clutch replacement at only 30,000 miles, suggesting potential misuse like being tracked or raced. @Karmabiker further sought specific information on the DME report and inspection dates. @Eblesson pointed out various nicks and scratches on the interior, indicating a need for restoration, which could be a deterrent for some bidders. The presence of these concerns hints at an underlying cautiousness amidst the overall positive sentiment.
|
|
 |
Positive: @WAGONBOYTD remarked positively on the sound of the 200 TDI engine, suggesting that it has a compelling auditory appeal and even proposed a driving video to showcase its performance. This indicates a strong appreciation for the vehicle's capabilities and character, particularly highlighting the quality of the diesel engine.
Neutral: @Fish1965 inquired about the vehicle's climate control, specifically whether the AC blows cold air and stated the importance of this feature. The response from @af1212 (The Seller) provided assurances about the AC system, confirming it was a Ministry Of Defender Kit and functional in various weather conditions, accompanied by a link for additional details. @RoverDefender1972 raised a question regarding whether the repair bills were included in the bill of sale, showing an interest in the vehicle's history and maintenance documentation.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle present in the gathered feedback, suggesting that the overall sentiment is positive or neutral with no expressed dissatisfaction or concerns from the commenters.
|
|
 |
Positive: @jsebby appreciates the vehicle's aesthetics, describing it as a good looking Bronco despite its challenging color that is hard to maintain. They express a desire for its location to be closer, wishing it were two or three thousand miles west, but ultimately convey good wishes for the auction's success. @mjm1968 adds to the positive sentiment by calling the vehicle a 'very cool rig', suggesting a strong admiration for the Bronco.
Neutral: @TbSamurai comments on a noticeable increase in the price, stating that if it were a poker scenario, they would call it a bluff. This remark indicates a level of surprise or skepticism regarding the auction's proceedings, without taking a definitive stance on the vehicle itself.
Negative:
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle's robust build and versatility. @BimmerDawg appreciates the ITBs on the S52 engine and is impressed by the strong performance numbers shared by @Hooty (The Seller), who confirms the car's stats of 234whp and 243wtq. @Mrmoon positively highlights the unique feature of having air conditioning in a track car, indicating it's a great combination of luxury and performance. @lcrain admires the build, sharing their own fondness for E36s and their dual-purpose capabilities. @mal10015 believes the individual throttle bodies significantly increase the car's value and reminisces about their own similar vehicle.
Neutral: Several inquiries and comments about the vehicle specifications indicate an interest in further details. @kiosko asks about the AC functionality and the vehicle's legality, to which @Hooty (The Seller) confirms that the car is fully registered and road-legal. @603blueM2 seeks clarification about the adjustability of the seats, and @Hooty (The Seller) explains the adjustment mechanism, allowing drivers to tailor their seating position. Additionally, @Bayardfox requests confirmation on the curb weight, which @Hooty verifies as 2923 lbs with a near-full tank. There is also a discussion about the racing elements of the car, such as the validity of the seats and harnesses, demonstrating an interest in regulations for competitive use.
Negative: A few comments suggest potential issues regarding the vehicle. @603blueM2 expresses concern about the adjustability of the seats, mentioning that they appear bolted and questioning their ease of use, which could be a drawback for some buyers. @lcrain also brings up the challenging aspect of driving without power steering, aiming to understand its manageability with the car's tire setup, indicating a level of uncertainty about usability. Overall, these comments highlight that while the car is well-received, there are practical considerations and questions that some potential buyers might have.
|
|
4,500-Mile 1999 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 30th Anniversary Edition Convertible WS6 6-Speed
2G2FV32G6X2225396
Lot 206316
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commentors expressed admiration for the 1999 Trans Am 30th Anniversary Edition being sold by @Culpeper. @2quik6 reminisced fondly about past Firebirds, highlighting their enjoyment of the model, while @GDogg was captivated by its stunning appearance, encouraging good luck with the sale. @Firecaptain and others showed appreciation for @Culpeper's promptness in addressing queries and providing details about the vehicle, such as acknowledging the inclusion of additional features and maintaining open communication with potential buyers.
Neutral: @Culpeper provided detailed responses to questions posed by interested parties, explaining the vehicle's condition and offering clarification on aspects like tire replacement and available documentation. For example, @Culpeper confirmed that the tires were new, having replaced the originals two years prior, and that he would provide additional pictures and videos as requested. The seller demonstrated a willingness to engage with potential buyers by responding thoughtfully to their inquiries.
Negative: There were some minor issues and concerns raised regarding the auction details, as @kguinn pointed out that the auction was mislabeled under the wrong category. This could potentially hinder notifications for interested buyers looking specifically for 1999 Firebirds, which prompted @bringatrailer to acknowledge the oversight and confirm that the category had been corrected. Overall, while the general sentiment was positive, these logistical issues brought a note of criticism regarding the auction's setup.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Sparkybz praises the 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser UZJ100 for its outstanding quality, suggesting that with proper detailing, it would truly shine. @gkirk79 (The Seller) expresses gratitude towards potential buyers with an open invitation for inquiries about the vehicle, demonstrating a willingness to assist. @gkirk79 also reassures bidders regarding the vehicle's maintenance and state, indicating it has been kept under cover and cared for while in storage.
Neutral: @84Cressida comments on the appearance of the vehicle's underside, suggesting that it might be dirt rather than rust. @Pcleez raises questions about the vehicle's unusually low mileage over two years and the adequacy of its maintenance while in a collection. @gkirk79 addresses these concerns by confirming the vehicle has indeed been maintained and used occasionally, although the details about service history are based on CarFax reports.
Negative: @Bonandmike humorously notes that the vehicle might not withstand 'salt corrosion' despite being described as 'bullet proof.' @Pcleez directly criticizes the condition of the vehicle, pointing out the dirty headlights and interior, questioning the care during its storage, and lamenting the lack of maintenance history. @b757ninja agrees with @Pcleez, highlighting the inadequate follow-up on essential maintenance details and expressing frustration over the vehicle's presentation and lack of transparency from the Seller.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Barryward describes the vehicle as "one nifty" indicating a level of enthusiasm and approval. @150,996sthelens believes that the vehicle is "pretty dang good," suggesting that it meets or exceeds expectations. @NAmanual praises the vehicle's driving video as the best they've seen, which speaks to the quality of the vehicle's presentation and performance.
Neutral: @ZeusBearThor seeks clarification on whether the stripes on the vehicle are painted or vinyl, showing an interest in the details of the vehicle's appearance. This indicates that potential buyers are engaged and want to understand more about what they are purchasing. @jeffr18, the seller, responds that the stripes are vinyl and part of the package, providing useful information back to the inquirer.
Negative:
|
|
 |
Positive: @930CharlesW (The Seller) highlights the bike's excellent condition, emphasizing its originality and performance. @cll2 recalls their fond memories of riding similar bikes in the Idaho mountains and describes the BW200 as a great and reliable bike that is fun to ride, suggesting that this particular model is also in great shape. @bigdawg appreciates the rarity and condition of the bike, noting that the 350 models are particularly special and stating that it must be an enjoyable experience to ride.
Neutral: The comments generally reflect a shared appreciation for the bike, with @Hotrod21 specifically expressing a nostalgic connection to a similar model they owned in the past. There is a consensus among the commenters regarding the bike's excellent shape and strong performance, which adds to its allure for potential buyers. The conversations are focused on the bike's characteristics and experiences associated with it, without significant contention or varying opinions.
Negative: No negative comments were noted about the vehicle. All feedback was overwhelmingly positive, with no criticism or concerns raised regarding the bike's condition or performance. The overall sentiment is one of enthusiasm and admiration, indicating a strong interest and favorable perception of the vehicle.
|
|
6.0L Vortec-Powered 1976 International Harvester Scout II 4×4
F0062FGD44320
Lot 206323
Private Party
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle generally highlight its impressive build quality and aesthetic appeal. @Boombox44 exclaims that it's a "Sweet rig!" while @That’sagreatride calls it a "great ride," suggesting that the overall presentation is appealing to potential buyers. @tlcamg appreciates the power of the engine/transmission combination and reflects fondly on personal memories with a similar vehicle, establishing an emotional connection with the Scout. @Captainpua notes the beauty of the Scout and expresses hope that it continues the Scout legacy, indicating a sense of community and continuity among enthusiasts. Additionally, @D_Ted compliments the build and expresses interest in an inspection, further underscoring the vehicle's allure.
Neutral: Several comments focus on logistical and practical considerations surrounding the vehicle rather than its appearance or performance. @carguy0707 inquires about the paint quality, suggesting a need for clarity on this aspect, which @mirwin2981 (The Seller) addresses by mentioning that the paint isn't show-car quality but is solid for a weekend cruiser. @D_Ted also requests additional photos to clarify details about paint issues, indicating that while there is enthusiasm for the Scout, potential buyers are looking for more detailed information. @mgus515 and @RsezPsez show concern for the documentation related to work done on the vehicle, signifying the importance of transparency in the sale process.
Negative: However, not all comments are entirely positive, as some express concerns or highlight potential drawbacks. @D_Ted points out a lack of driving videos, which could help substantiate its performance claims, while @Emelton24 suggests that the vehicle needs further investment in paint and body work to maximize its potential. @RsezPsez presses for specific paperwork related to the engine and drivetrain swap, and @Jeepster questions whether the price is near the reserve, hinting at possible reservations about the vehicle's value. Overall, while many commend the Scout, there are clear calls for more clarity and assurances from the seller regarding the vehicle's condition and history.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Yakester (The Seller) has received praise from various commenters about the vehicle's appeal. @ThejudgeRoy expressed admiration for the car's color, noting they would consider it if it were a manual transmission. @DFLX reminisced about selling similar models in the past, highlighting their performance and build quality. @KrisA also chimed in, affirming that the turbo automatic version is just as fast and enjoyable as the manual, and @Jzack described the driving experience as exhilarating, particularly on two-lane roads.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a neutral stance, focusing on the aspects of the vehicle that are neither strongly positive nor negative. @NateFox questioned the choice of wheels on a 300ZX, prompting @EvorICE to invite a look at the listing gallery. @Torstang acknowledged the unconventional wheel choice, but remarked that they look surprisingly good. Commenters have also discussed the car's performance details, with @Yakester (The Seller) providing insights about the car's suspension and driving modes, explaining the current condition of the struts and their functionality.
Negative: However, there are concerns raised regarding the vehicle's maintenance status. @Darkhorsegt questioned whether the timing belt had been replaced recently, as the Carfax report showed limited service history. @negative44 requested a cold start and driving video, which pointed to a need for better transparency in the seller's communication. @Yakester (The Seller) admitted to not replacing the timing belt in the past six years and described the current condition of the belts and hoses, which may cause concern for potential buyers about the vehicle's maintenance.
|
|
 |
Positive: @1937Cord (The Seller) described the vehicle as a real roadster with factory paperwork and emphasized its high quality, including a top-notch restoration and beautiful paint job. @boaboyoz called it a 'righteous red Thunderbird Sports Roadster', indicating appreciation for its aesthetic. @Bird66 also expressed admiration, hoping the car fetches a price that reflects its worth, while noting a potential issue with the hydraulic pump that could affect the decklid and top functions.
Neutral: Several comments focused on geographical references, particularly regarding New Braunfels and Boerne, with @bosshoss3406pack and @Boerne1735 offering insights into their locations and pronunciations. @RNash acknowledged the style of the car, hinting at a connection to Texas culture. Seller's transparency throughout the interaction was noted as @1937Cord (The Seller) engaged with questions regarding the car's features and history, describing its handling and offering inspection opportunities.
Negative: @RalphieBoy raised a concern regarding a potential design flaw in the 390 engine, asking about an exhaust leak that could cause a ticking noise, while @Abbottauto213 questioned the functioning of the choke during cold start. The comments reflect a mix of critiques and inquiries that underscore the importance of addressing mechanical concerns alongside the car's appealing aesthetic.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Dutch0334 praised the car as a "very nice Canadian car" and expressed intent to buy it, emphasizing the good care it has received. @GDogg was impressed with the car's Iris Blue Pearl color, stating it must look sensational in the sunlight. Other commentors like @GCT and @M.T.Anderson also admired the color and its combination, as well as the car's mechanical condition, with @M.T.Anderson hoping it receives the love it deserves. @Spokayman and others pointed out the unique nature of the vehicle and its potential value, with some expressing their appreciation for its clean look without a rear spoiler.
Neutral: Several discussions about tariffs and import duties were found among the comments, highlighting a mix of information about costs to bring the car from Canada to the U.S. @concours and @vansters noted that vehicles over 25 years old are exempt from most tariffs, while others like @Maui944 recounted personal experiences that suggest varying fees. @Aspanglercs and @Teutonic also offered insights regarding the car's factory build specifications and options, noting the absence of a rear spoiler might have implications for its value and performance. Additionally, the community shared resources about how to import vehicles and questions concerning how to replace or install a spoiler if desired.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car's history, particularly regarding a "possible odometer roll-back" mentioned in the CARFAX report, with @Rmander45 and @Houston34s seeking clarification. @Peiper expressed skepticism about the reliability of CARFAX, while @linderpat criticized the seller for not providing enough information or more pictures during the auction. Some users like @FerdinandWilsdorf noted issues such as potential cracks in the dash and the need for better documentation regarding the car's original spoiler. Overall, while most comments reflected enthusiasm, several highlighted ambiguity relating to the property's history and the seller's responsiveness.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as a beautiful SL and appreciates its color combination and European headlights. @GDogg calls the 280SL gorgeous and wishes it well. @bestman718 shares a nostalgic experience about owning a similar 280SL, fondly remembering a unique feature that made it special.
Neutral: @tarratine expresses interest in keeping the car in Maine and @33z mentions the car is heading to Florida. @tbwittbuilder (The Seller) provides information about the car, stating that the differential leaks and the air conditioning is no longer functional, while confirming that the notches are intact.
Negative: @stevewrealty questions what is leaking under the car, which raises concerns about potential issues. @JarrodG72 seeks undercarriage photos and highlights rust concerns. @slcohen52 inquires if the engine and transmission are original to the car, suggesting a need for verification regarding authenticity.
|
|
 |
Positive: @CarFoolLane highlights the interesting original build of the vehicle, noting rare features like the AM/FM stereo radio, which was an uncommon upgrade during the early Mustang years. @ChuckLs also praises the condition of the Mach 1, suggesting it has been well-cared for over the years, while emphasizing the appeal of its unmodified state despite having some add-ons such as the front spoiler and rear wing. Other comments from @Automaxx and @EvorICE celebrate the car's originality and attractiveness, indicating that it checks all the boxes for classic car enthusiasts and is likely to turn heads while cruising.
Neutral: The discussion touches on the vehicle's engine, as @thkfast expresses confusion regarding the engine options available in 1970. @CessnaFlyer and @BucksRealtor add to this engine debate, indicating varying views on whether the 351W or 351C engine was installed. The seller, @ExclusiveMotorClub, shares details about the car's condition and history, mentioning a lack of extensive paperwork but asserting that it is mostly original and a strong driver. Various commentors engage in technical discussions about engine codes and variations, reflecting the complexity and interest surrounding this classic model.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition arise in comments such as from @z28plus, who questions the presence of rust in the trunk area, while @streetrodsda warns about potential overheating issues, suggesting that the engine temperature readings are concerning. Additionally, the discussion hints at the possibility of paintwork on various panels with comments from @ExclusiveMotorClub addressing inquiries regarding overspray and prior repairs, indicating some uncertainty about the car's originality despite its appealing features.
|
|
 |
Positive: @David_P expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's color, complimenting how well it pairs with the cookie cutter wheels. @Caymanorcarrera commented positively on the vehicle's tidiness and suggests it appears well-loved. Others, like @Check_61 and @David_P, echoed praise for the vehicle's aesthetic, with @Check_61 appreciating the wheels' look and @David_P noting the overall beauty of its color.
Neutral: @dowjames (The Seller) discussed the color mismatch noted by @David_P, attributing it to lighting in the photographs. He provided clarification regarding the engine's potential rebuild history, stating that records show it was rebuilt in 1996 but emphasized the relevance of such old information. Additionally, he noted that the buyer could request specific images of parts like the undercarriage, although he lacks access to a lift for optimal photography.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle include @Gregoryjohn007's request for detailed photos of rust areas and the undercarriage, indicating apprehension about potential unseen defects. @KWNCan and @mattshear18 both questioned the state of the engine, suggesting uncertainty about whether it has been rebuilt. Lastly, some users like @coralreefer expressed frustration over misinformation regarding tariffs and import duties, highlighting that inaccuracies can affect potential buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: @nhorster praised the vehicle's build quality, highlighting solid design choices and a clean fuel rail setup. @JGraham complimented the bike's overall build and expressed admiration for its remote start mechanism, suggesting minor ergonomic adjustments for comfort. @Motogrotto called it a great bike and seller, emphasizing the high quality of the entire collection and the seller's dedication to maintaining optimal operating condition, while @sfmonster23 expressed a desire for the bike to go to an active rider and confirmed the bike's design merits.
Neutral: @sfmonster23 provided updates on the auction, addressing concerns regarding the battery placement and limited mileage, and encouraged potential buyers not to be deterred by shipping costs. @1of80 remarked on the tire selection for the bike, noting they could easily be changed post-purchase. @baycity supported this sentiment, explaining that the tires are dual sport and easy to replace, and @johncg inquired about where to find replacement air filters, which @sfmonster23 confirmed could be found at various parts stores.
Negative: @NCR600TT questioned the legitimacy of previous auction bids, implying they were from a shill bidder, while @1of80's comment was flagged as non-constructive. @nhorster raised concerns about potential temperature issues with the battery placement and noted the missing odometer might be a legal issue in some areas. Additionally, several commenters found fault with the bike's tire choice, suggesting more traditional options could be better, though @sfmonster23 defended the builder's choices.
|
|
 |
Positive: @RoscoePDogg noted that the vehicle is a nice WJ in a great color and that it has an interesting background as it was once a rental from National Car Rental, hinting at a potentially unique specification. @Double-E shared positive remarks about the vehicle's appearance, expressing that it looked like a great example. Furthermore, @IdahoTruckAndRV appreciated the responses to inquiries regarding the features, thanking @brianmenezes for clarifying the hydraulic cooling fan system utilized in the model.
Neutral: @Cappy88 pointed out the vehicle does not have a two-wheel drive option, confirming it operates as all-wheel-drive with four-wheel-drive low as the only option available. @Double-E added that there is a correction regarding the 4WD system, mentioning it is the Quadra-Trac II rather than Quadra-Drive, adding details from the build sheet to support this claim. This information aligns with @RoscoePDogg's comment about the transfer case shared between QD and QT2, indicating a nuanced understanding of the vehicle's systems.
Negative: @DPitman raised concerns about the aftermarket receiver hitch, speculating on the absence of a 7-pin electrical plug and questioning whether the vehicle includes the towing package or transmission cooler. @Double-E confirmed there was no tow package as the vehicle left the factory, although he noted that adding a hitch would be straightforward. These concerns highlight potential limitations for prospective buyers interested in towing capabilities.
|
|
 |
Positive: @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) shares that the 2021 Porsche Cayenne is loaded with features such as 4-Zone Climate Control, Soft-Close Doors, 21-inch Wheels, and a Premium Plus Package. The seller describes the vehicle as very nice, having been driven extensively before listing and assures bidders that it has a cold air conditioning system, two keys, and a lithium battery, enhancing its appeal. Additionally, the seller expresses confidence in the auction process, stating that bidders can proceed with a no-reserve auction, encouraging interest and trust in the sale.
Neutral: @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) provides detailed information about the car's history, revealing that it did not pass smog testing in California in June but later assured that it has been serviced and passed emissions testing without any issues. The seller also notes that most tires are relatively new, with date codes from 2023 and 2024, and all measure around 7/32nds. Regarding the vehicle's condition, the seller confirms that there are no foul odors from smoking and addresses inquiries about the appearance of the trunk and dashboard, clarifying that there are no battery fault messages or permanent scratches.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle, particularly by @username11 regarding possible wear in the trunk area and the state of the interior based on a picture. @razyus77 also questioned the reasons behind the initial smog test failure, seeking clarity on any current emissions challenges. Additionally, @Fourteener asked about completion of the service history, which the seller could not confirm definitively, and @SKA24 wanted to clarify whether scratches on the dashboard were permanent, indicating potential issues that might need attention.
|
|
2004 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD LT Extended Cab Duramax 4×4
1GCHK29284E253587
Lot 206333
Private Party
 |
Positive: @rbohnert (The Seller) expressed satisfaction with the truck’s capabilities, especially while towing a 32-foot camper in challenging Missouri terrain. They reported that the truck never overheated or struggled with shifting, stating it performed exceptionally well by simply using 30 lbs in the airbags and the tow/haul button. Additionally, @rbohnert confirmed that everything in the truck works correctly, including the power control switches for the seats and the heating and cooling features, and noted that the truck has been well taken care of, having never been exposed to salted roads and stored climate-controlled.
Neutral: @GMT400Man, @Wehrli37, and @YennaM engaged in an informative discussion about the Duramax engine types, with @Wehrli37 providing detailed insights on how to identify engine generations through visual cues and VIN codes. The inquiry about tire conditions from @scoper69 was met with @rbohnert’s response regarding tire date codes and usage, ensuring potential buyers were informed. Other comments from users like @Paschal and @Gbowkill focused on specific features and requests for additional information, demonstrating an active interest in the vehicle’s specifications and condition.
Negative: While the comments were predominantly positive or neutral, some concerns were raised regarding minor issues, such as the appearance of front tire wear noted by @scoper69 and the driver's seat power control switch appearing broken in the photos, questioned by @Gbowkill. @Chriszark asked about the truck's performance under heavy towing, specifically regarding overheating or transmission issues. These queries highlight areas that potential buyers might find concerning, despite the seller's reassurances.
|
|
20-Years-Family-Owned 2005 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon 4.0
1J4FA64S65P362347
Lot 206334
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the unique attributes of the Jeep, with @427cobrasnake calling it a 'neat LJ' and appreciating the 'crazy lime green' color. @Ibtbone referred to it as a 'pretty darn rare jeep,' highlighting its desirability. The acknowledgment of its garage-kept condition for the last eight years and regular servicing by a Jeep specialist shared by @keribaughman (The Seller) also contributed positively to perceptions of the vehicle's maintenance.
Neutral: Several commenters requested more detailed pictures of the vehicle’s undercarriage and other components, mentioning specific areas that were of concern, such as frame rails and suspension. @rustyray and @acett pointed out the expected rust due to the vehicle’s age and geographical history, while @sierrazuluecho and @Broncos6 noted the need for complete undercarriage photos to support the sale. This prudent approach reflects a common desire among potential buyers for thorough inspection evidence.
Negative: There were concerns about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the rust described by @rustyray, who noted it was not surprising given its history. @acett echoed this worry about the high mileage and overall rust, suggesting it warranted caution. @lucky12345678910 implied that the absence of undercarriage photos might indicate problems, while the need for comprehensive answers to technical questions regarding modifications was raised by @DaddyDeuce, pointing to potential issues with the lift installation and overall mechanical integrity.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and modifications, with @nikojo expressing deep admiration, saying, "Bellissima!" @serve-n-folly praises the gorgeous interior color combination, while @Tombo62 describes the experience of driving the 575M as an absolute dream due to its manual transmission and satisfying gear shifts. @dhalperin13, the seller, mentions the car's transformation with a new gated manual transmission, stating that the conversion retains the original character of the vehicle, and @SteveinVT congratulates the seller for the performed upgrades, emphasizing how the Ferrari 575M occupies a unique niche in automotive history. Enthusiasts express excitement and love for the sound of the custom exhaust by Fabio Fiammenghi, further highlighting the car's uniqueness as both a visual and auditory delight.
Neutral: Several comments ask for clarification about the vehicle's mechanical features, such as the functionality of the rev limiter and emissions compliance. @nikojo inquires about emissions testing in Illinois and how the conversion might affect compatibility with service tools used by Ferrari dealers. @MMWX provides a positive response about the technical support for the conversion, saying that many workshops can handle maintenance or repairs associated with the manual conversion. @dhalperin13 reassures potential buyers about the car's mechanical reliability and the ongoing support available for the modifications, further mentioning accessories, such as the original wheels provided in the sale, enhancing the vehicle's appeal.
Negative: A few comments reflect skepticism about the conversion and its long-term reliability. @hwhoover and others question the change from a rod linkage to a cable system and what implications that might have on performance. Users like @onlyhonda4me echo support for the manual swap but are cautious about potential issues that might arise from such modifications. @Eferrari34 raises concerns about what would happen if the conversion had problems post-purchase, asking if only one specialized workshop can address these needs. This inquiry points to underlying worries regarding the support network for aftermarket modifications, a theme that resonates throughout several discussions.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its exceptional specifications and unique features. @P1Motorwerks_Phil (The Seller) emphasized that the car is a 'unicorn spec GT3 Touring' and shared insights about its original order and condition. Commenters like @sultan68 and @flat6love praised the car, with one calling it a 'million dollar dream spec.' Observations about the distinct color combinations, such as the black wheels with a guards red lip, added to the appeal. Further positive remarks included a focus on the car's excellent condition and the seller's commitment to providing detailed information, which instilled confidence in potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments offered neutral or practical observations about the vehicle's features and auction process. @chi_pt inquired about technical details such as the DME and decals, which @P1Motorwerks_Phil addressed comprehensively. @wishfulthinker23 noted the low risk in making it a No Reserve auction, indicating a favorable outlook on the sale strategy. Additionally, @P1Motorwerks_Phil provided insights regarding the dealership's operations, ensuring bidders could expect a smooth transaction and quality service. This backdrop of detailed sharing created a balanced perspective that acknowledged the excitement without delving into emotional praise or criticism.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive reception, some comments hinted at minor critiques. @ChrisCOak mentioned that while he loved various components of the car, he found the overall aesthetics slightly busy. The only significant concerns seemed to revolve around the car's unusual color combination discussed by @maranello1983, who listed multiple colors present in the vehicle, suggesting it may not appeal to all tastes. However, these remarks were mild and did not detract substantially from the overall enthusiasm shared by the majority of commenters.
|
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle being auctioned, a 390 Galaxie 500 convertible, has garnered appreciation for its classic appeal and performance features. @Allan_L. (The Seller) highlighted the unique aspects like the Tri-Power system and what seems to be a performance camshaft, which gives it a sporty feel that enthusiasts seem to enjoy. Commenters like @thatsakillerpiece noted the car's potential with its old-school characteristics, emphasizing a nostalgic sentiment towards classic cars with modern enhancements. Additionally, there is a detailed approach from the seller in providing information about the car's systems and recent updates, which has been welcomed by prospective buyers.
Neutral: General inquiries about the vehicle have centered around its specifications and condition details. Commenters like @corvettom9 and @AirForce1978 sought clarity about the engine and air conditioning system, which @Allan_L. addressed thoroughly, providing insights on the engine's casting code and installation of the A/C system. @Hvacviper94 also inquired about driving the vehicle over long distances, to which the seller acknowledged the logistics involved, providing a balanced view on potential concerns. The seller has made it clear that further videos showcasing the vehicle's performance will be released, satisfying those curious about the car's idling and driving capabilities.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's current operational status have emerged. Unfortunately, @Allan_L. recently disclosed that the convertible top motor has failed, prompting an adjustment to the auction timeline as repairs are sought. Commenters like @MikFerg have raised issues about the condition of the seats and the air conditioning components, adding to the uncertainty among potential bidders. The seller is working to address these issues transparently, which does create some apprehension in the bidding community, particularly with the mention of needed repairs and the overall appeal of a classic car that may require additional work to be fully operational.
|
|
 |
Positive: @F16Jock expressed admiration for the vehicle's color combination, suggesting only a change to leather seats matching the colors. @boaboyoz called it a 'groovy green over green + gray 210' and referred to it as a tasty build, complementing it with an enthusiastic expression. Additionally, @mo8ius noted that it is a gorgeous car, and @turbolou praised its beauty and presentation.
Neutral: @jcoker78 (The Seller) confirmed there is no rust anywhere and mentioned that the gauges are Dakota Digital RTX. Furthermore, he clarified that no body panels, including the floors, have been replaced. @Banksonit709 inquired about the proximity to a specific zip code, while @Jfred0880 questioned what was intended for the hole in the dash and the wire hanging nearby, to which @jcoker78 provided a detailed response regarding the aftermarket air horn button.
Negative: @turbolou raised a concern about potential rust damage and the replacement of any body panels, including the floors, although @jcoker78 (The Seller) assured that no panels had been replaced. Additionally, @DSUdden asked for the paint color code, presumably indicating uncertainty about its authenticity.
|
|
 |
Positive: @VintagePete commented positively on a video related to the vehicle, indicating it effectively conveyed information about the car and gave it a thumbs up. @rogerhahn (The Seller) appreciated the feedback and offered to provide more pictures if needed, showing a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Neutral: @19Willys46 inquired about work performed on the car, specifically asking about a picture related to repairs. @rogerhahn (The Seller) affirmed that a new AC compressor was installed, but the AC still did not blow cold air, as he primarily enjoyed driving the car with the top down. @2006m5 asked if the seller had any insights into the lack of cold air from the AC system, which @rogerhahn (The Seller) suggested might be due to an original component failure despite the mechanic's prior efforts to resolve the issue.
Negative: @rogerhahn (The Seller) expressed uncertainty regarding the non-functional AC, mentioning that although a new compressor was installed, it still did not work properly, indicating a potential underlying issue. He noted that the vehicle is original and suggested the need for a more qualified mechanic to diagnose the problem, hinting at possible difficulties for buyers concerning the it not being in perfect working order.
|
|
 |
Positive: Numerous comments express excitement about the high quality and rarity of the 1997 Ford F-350 1-ton crew cab, especially noting its low mileage of only 95,833 miles over 28 years of careful use. Many are drawn to the truck's well-preserved condition and original paint, highlighting its history as a vehicle used for transporting wine barrels in California's Sonoma Valley. The clean Carfax report and lack of accidents also contribute positively to the vehicle's appeal, making it seem like an excellent opportunity for potential bidders.
Neutral: Several inquiries explore the details of the truck, with @Txbiket questioning the presence of a hitch and any potential damage to the truck bed. @jma256 asks about the emissions equipment and its recent smog inspection, which @WCD2020 confirms, adding reassurance regarding the vehicle's compliance and operational status. Questions about the driver's side seat's condition and the truck's ability to make a long trip back to Ohio also reflect prospective buyers gathering more information before the auction.
Negative: Some comments indicate minor concerns about the lack of images of the truck's bed and the driver's seat, as noted by users like @Txbiket and @Y2Kishprime. Additionally, there are questions about whether the truck is a 4x4 model, which might deter bidders if it does not fit their needs. Users seem to be looking for further clarification and transparency about the vehicle's condition before committing to a bid.
|
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed excitement about the 2015 Porsche Cayenne Diesel, particularly highlighting its aesthetic appeal and performance. @DavidKurtanidze shared a heartfelt message about how this vehicle matches his long-held vision of owning a Porsche, praising its blend of power and efficiency and acknowledging Porsche's superior engineering. He noted the Cayenne's timeless design as elegant yet aggressive, emphasizing the personal significance of finally having the opportunity to bid on it after extensive research and preparation. Additionally, @MJLMotorcars (The Seller) has provided multiple updates and content, showcasing the vehicle's condition and inviting enthusiasts to engage with the auction.
Neutral: @clemente102 asked if the sale includes the owner's manuals and two keys, which @MJLMotorcars (The Seller) confirmed, stating that the diesel model does indeed come with them. Comments also reflected the practical aspects of buying the Cayenne, such as inquiries about a rear cargo cover from @bleeder, to which @MJLMotorcars (The Seller) noted that this vehicle did not come with that accessory. Furthermore, @triton420 raised a concern about brake dust on the wheels, prompting the seller to clarify the detailing circumstances, noting that a professional could clean it more thoroughly.
Negative: On a less favorable note, @triton420 commented on visible brake dust staining on the wheels, indicating that the vehicle may not have been cleaned regularly. This raised questions about the vehicle's maintenance history and overall condition. Additionally, there was a lack of availability for some accessories, such as the cargo cover, as indicated by @bleeder's inquiry which suggests that potential buyers may have concerns about completeness or upkeep. These minor negative points could impact the overall perception of the vehicle for some potential buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Alaskastang expresses enthusiasm about the vehicle's components, highlighting features such as the plywood bulkhead and chrome rims while likening it to his youthful experiences with a similar model. @robbiefarmer shares a nostalgic love for the aesthetics of the vehicle, recalling fond memories associated with the rims, which he believes enhance its appearance. @minidude admires the vehicle's current condition, appreciating its 'working clothes' look and seeing it as a blank canvas for future modifications, indicating that it isn't overly used or rusted.
Neutral: @carfoollane observes the presence of multiple comments but notes the lack of a typical 'free candy' reference, indicating a common joke among those discussing such vehicles. @clueless_jalop suggests an alternative theme for the vehicle, recommending it take on a Ford Super Van livery to match its style, while retaining the original engine. DJAutos (The Seller) confirms that the heating works perfectly, but the air conditioning has issues that prevent it from functioning effectively after a short period, sharing practical usage details about the vehicle.
Negative: @SmileyFace raises a concern about the air conditioning, questioning whether the compressor was indeed replaced after being informed of its freon leak. This implies potential issues for prospective buyers regarding the vehicle's maintenance. @bondgraham reflects on his experience with a similar vehicle that required repairs for sagging and shocks, suggesting that while he values the overall performance, there might be underlying maintenance needs that new owners should consider.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Capt._Doug praises the vehicle for its aesthetic appeal and design, noting that cars like this are rarely available for sale. The mention of the six-speed transmission as a bonus adds to its allure. @Carneed (The Seller) expresses excitement about the car's return to the market, highlighting that it has been meticulously cared for by @Candnut, the previous owner, who maintained it in excellent condition. With all service records available and a recent oil change performed, the Seller looks forward to finding a new owner for this beloved vehicle.
Neutral: Multiple comments come from @Candnut, the previous owner, who offers insights into the car's reliability and shares that he is willing to answer questions for potential buyers. He confirms that he saved the head unit and CD changer after discarding the inoperative original sound system, demonstrating his commitment to maintaining a connection with the vehicle. @SGA inquires about the operation of the top, showing interest in the car's features. @Carneed (The Seller) responds promptly, providing a video link and encouraging potential bidders with information about their availability for questions before the auction ends.
Negative: @WWIIII raises a concern regarding potential issues with the balance shaft sprocket, a known problem for this model, sparking curiosity about the vehicle's reliability. @verden adds that although they loved their similar vehicle, they experienced discomfort on long journeys due to hard seats and noted visibility issues caused by the rearview mirror and windshield rake, which create a significant blind spot at junctions. These remarks highlight some risks associated with the vehicle, despite its many strengths.
|
|
 |
Positive: @mr_smee describes the car as beautiful, encouraging potential owners to drive it and enjoy it. @topduarte echoes this sentiment, suggesting to replace all fluids and parts before enjoying the car. @newcarpro appreciates the beautiful Blue on Blue color and adds that it is a survivor. @johnnyvett and @johnjm recognize the car's aesthetic appeal, noting the well-done final facelift of the 80-82 model, with @johnjm suggesting it would be nice for the new owner to drive it more. @gravelgrinder mentions a personal bias towards the 80-82 style, sharing positive experiences with Corvettes of that era. @G-ManZ15 finds it admirable, noting the car's value for restorers and reminiscing about his era of Corvettes.
Neutral: @JimGlassCorvette (The Seller) is requested by @gravelgrinder to provide detailed scoring sheets for the car's awards. The seller informs that the car has not undergone significant changes in the last 23 years and emphasizes that it remains relatively bone stock. Both @RJS1725 and @67corvettecs ask about the conditions of original components, such as the power antenna, demonstrating a neutral curiosity about the original state of the car's parts and its historical value in the collector market. A discussion also occurs around the unusual mileage of the car between low and high, as mentioned by @johnjm and @CarFoolLane, with no definitive conclusion on the owner's initial intent.
Negative: @cyclemikey expresses frustration over comments suggesting the car should be driven rather than preserved, arguing that such perspectives undermine the vintage car hobby. @johnjm and @CarFoolLane point out that the low mileage could indicate an unspectacular history, implying that it was not purposefully saved for collector reasons. @johnjm reflects on how this car's condition raises questions about its story, hinting that it may have simply been a conventional purchase without the intent of it becoming a collectible. Overall, there is a slight negativity towards the notion of merely driving such vehicles instead of appreciating their historical significance.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many users have praised the vehicle, emphasizing its striking design and performance capabilities. @Angeliandrew mentions that it attracts significant attention, being described as a 'bad ass machine' by @schulman93 and @1stindoor reflected on its beauty with fond memories of their own sand rail. @Lubricator compliments the sound of the engine, highlighting its high horsepower, and expresses optimism towards the engine's build quality. The vehicle is characterized as a head-turner and a well-constructed machine, making it ideal for both car shows and off-road adventures.
Neutral: Comments revealing the vehicle's registration status sparked discussions around its street legality. @Gumby1 raised concerns about legal requirements regarding windshields and brakes in Florida, prompting a defense from the seller (@Angeliandrew), who assured that the vehicle is street legal. This initiated a back-and-forth among users like @schulman93 and @1stindoor, who emphasized their own experiences with similar vehicles being street legal in multiple states, further clarifying the vehicle's legal standing without settling the debate entirely.
Negative: There were some criticisms about the vehicle's claims of being fully street legal. @Gumby1 pointed out deficiencies such as a lack of windshields and the requirement of having two working braking systems for street legality, which cast doubt on the seller's assertions. Additionally, some users expressed skepticism about the claimed engine power, with @Lubricator suggesting that while it may not reach 200+HP, it is still a top-quality build. This tension about the vehicle's specifications and compliance with local laws contributed to a complex narrative surrounding its sale.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's unique features and handling capabilities. @K_Singh praised the car as one of the best-handling vehicles ever made and remarked on its beauty as a four-door model. @2mAn even estimated a market value of around $20,000, indicating confidence in the car's appeal. The seller, @FLITZER_HAUS, highlighted the car's provenance, providing reassurance about its history and maintenance records, which also garnered positive remarks from potential buyers.
Neutral: Commenters showed curiosity about the car's specifications, especially in relation to its European origins versus North American specifications. @bmwdude and @CarCrazy24 raised questions about the BAR tag and the engine type, while @JMOMOJO pointed out mixed features of the model. @zednick17 contributed insight by referencing the VIN, adding to the discussion about the car's specifications and classifications. Overall, these inquiries reflect genuine interest in the vehicle's detailed history and technical aspects without any definitive conclusions.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the car's condition and missing components. @2mAn expressed disappointment about the original wheels being reported as missing after the car went to a shop for a swap, which led to skepticism regarding the vehicle's maintenance history. @guguman inquired if the vehicle included the original wheels, signaling that buyers might be worried about authenticity and completeness. Additionally, questions about potential odometer discrepancies due to past conversions sparked some doubt regarding the vehicle's history, as noted by @FLITZER_HAUS with the mention of a possible odometer rollback.
|
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its striking design and rarity. @Gryphon12, the seller, noted that the SL65 is a one-owner, well-maintained example with a rare color combination that emphasizes both luxury and performance. @georgepehanick and @Hoodude praised the car's aesthetics, calling it stunning and a potential car of a lifetime, suggesting its desirability and appeal. Many participants, including @absent, commended the interior quality and design, indicating that it surpasses more modern vehicles.
Neutral: Comments reflected curiosity and inquiry related to the auction process and vehicle specifics. @Ricky2025 raised questions about the vehicle's ownership history, while @atlantaMortgage expressed interest in seeing the car in action with a driving video. Commenters like @Sassicaia showed appreciation for the transparency in communication from the seller, who readily provided details about the car's history and condition. The engagement illustrated an active discussion surrounding the auction and vehicle details, with a mix of genuine interest and clarifying questions.
Negative: Some remarks highlighted concerns and skepticism regarding the vehicle. @dlasic had a comment flagged as non-constructive due to a negative remark about the paint quality, reflecting typical apprehensions associated with certain color issues. @spyboy went as far as removing the car from their watchlist due to perceived over-promotion in terms of requested new pictures and videos, suggesting that excessive marketing might detract from genuine interest. Additionally, comments about the Mars Red paint issue further fueled discussions about potential problems, raising questions about reliability and performance.
|
|
 |
Positive: @rdot praised the aesthetic choice of red dials in the vehicle. @Vwrabbitgti expressed admiration for the simplicity and beauty of the 996 GT3, affirming the quality of such cars. @RickyDC shared a positive personal experience about purchasing from (The Seller), noting the seller's meticulous care and effort in maintaining his Porsche, and assured future buyers of the GT3's excellent condition. @ScottAz echoed this sentiment, highlighting the desirable presentation and features of the car in Guards red, calling everything about it 'perfect.' In addition, @MusicCityMoondog described this GT3 as an 'incredible opportunity' with a distinctive engine sound, emphasizing its appeal.
Neutral: Several respondents, including @JorJor and @wrshp, sought clarification from (The Seller) regarding specific details about the vehicle’s condition and history, particularly concerning the engine replacement noted in the Carfax report. @JorJor inquired about potential blemishes and noises while driving, while @wrshp expressed frustration over the unclear engine replacement notation and requested further verification of the engine's details. (The Seller) responded that he was trying to gather more information regarding the engine replacement and confirmed that the vehicle features a unique headliner texture that may lead to perceived blemishes under certain lighting.
Negative: Concerns arose about the vehicle's history, particularly from @Vwrabbitgti and @sykraft, with questions over why a new motor was needed at only 12,000 miles and what that might indicate about the vehicle’s overall reliability. @MGB6 questioned whether the car had been tracked or raced, hinting at potential wear or damage. Additionally, @nodriveraids noted that while the 996.2 GT3 is an exceptional car, it is underappreciated in terms of its value relative to the experience it offers, suggesting ongoing concerns about the market perception of this model.
|
|
 |
Positive: Comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and nostalgic value. @sanuk fondly recalls their own experiences traveling in a camper van, indicating this model might fetch a good price. @roverchef emphasizes the van's beauty, cherishing the memories of childhood spent in similar models, which adds a heartfelt touch to the appreciation of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several questions were raised about the functionality and specifications of the van. @wamckay inquires about the refrigerator's power source, highlighting a genuine interest in its features. @Spree seeks clarification on the upper bunk's size, while @MikeJFlat asks where the van was manufactured, indicating practical curiosity without expressing strong opinions.
Negative: There are some concerns about the van that suggest uncertainty. @TR3orMGB, for instance, questions the location of the toilet unit, hinting at a lack of information potentially leading to confusion. Additionally, @freestyling's inquiry about the clutch and brakes suggests apprehension regarding the vehicle's condition, even though @Cheko (The Seller) reassures that they are 'ready to rock'. This indicates a need for further assurance about the van's reliability.
|
|
 |
Positive: @rmp5s expressed excitement about the vehicle, noting a connection through his past experiences in the Marine Corps and expressing a desire to acquire one. @stevensonal praised the quality of the vehicle, remarking that it looked like it was well done and clearly loved, which enhances its appeal. @06Sapper shared enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly highlighting the fun aspect with the mention of the license plate, while @Viper0311 called it a "sweet ride" and indicated eagerness to follow the auction.
Neutral: @rasman9, a potential buyer from New Hampshire, was curious about the vehicle's location and expressed interest in seeing it in person if possible. @idigmywork (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the included doors in a direct manner, confirming that original armored doors were taken off before sale and providing location information to @rasman9. Additionally, @VolterM offered practical advice to the potential new owner regarding the installation of a windshield washer nozzle and reservoir for improved functionality, indicating a thoughtful approach to ownership.
Negative: @59FUELIEIMPALA inquired about the original hard doors, expressing concern since the government had taken them. Similarly, @Unhcampus raised a question about the A/C system's functionality and asked about any potential blow-by from the oil cap, suggesting some apprehension regarding the vehicle's current condition and performance. These comments indicate a cautious approach from prospective buyers regarding the vehicle's complete status and usability.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Burdy thinks the ND1 looks fantastic and praises its wheels. @56PackardMan shares that Miatas are incredibly fun to drive, citing his previous experiences with a 2017 RF Grand Touring 6-speed model and mentioning the car's reliability. @Tonygforce commends the exceptional photography of the listing, suggesting that the images truly showcase the beauty of the car.
Neutral: @gaddyup asks for clarification on the terms RF and ND, showing curiosity about the model specifics. @Crankepants provides an explanation, noting that ND refers to the fourth-generation MX-5 while RF stands for Retractable Fastback. @Rhino_01 inquires about the trunk space's suitability for golf clubs, and @JLCerr59 questions the cockpit space for taller drivers, with multiple users sharing their fitting experiences.
Negative: @Eriz expresses confusion over the sudden spike in bids, claiming the car is not worth $250k. @drcarter007 advises @JLCerr59 that the ND model may not provide enough space for taller individuals, describing the tightness in the cabin. @97STO supports this by detailing personal struggles with legroom in the LE version, illustrating difficulties faced by taller drivers.
|
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered some positive attention, particularly for its nostalgic appeal. @Carcowboy expressed enjoyment of the car and even appreciated the seller's name, indicating a connection to the listing. Additionally, @QuestionEverything (The Seller) provided a thorough overview of the vehicle’s maintenance and recent repairs done, listing numerous OEM parts that were replaced, which speaks to the car's overall care. The seller's personal connection and willingness to provide a walkaround video and answer questions shows a commitment to transparency and customer service.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's condition were somewhat mixed. While @jbh30319 noted the potential lack of factory AC, which aligns with the seller's clarification about the car having hand-crank windows, others, like @Lastcoupe and @lledwod, discussed technical aspects that could affect the engine performance. @QuestionEverything (The Seller) shared their preventive measures, like a leak down test and insights into the history of the vehicle, which added informative content without any clear judgment on the vehicle's value or appeal.
Negative: However, several concerns were raised about the engine's condition, with @2002WS6 questioning the integrity of the block and discussing the potential for a cracked head, while @lledwod suggested a possible issue with the timing cover leading to coolant mixing with the oil. @QuestionEverything (The Seller) confirmed there was a significant issue with the engine, noting the discovery of 'milkshake oil', which created disappointment. They expressed frustration regarding their inability to repair it due to housing limitations, underscoring a negative sentiment about parting with an incomplete project.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the Jaguar F-Type R Convertible, highlighting its beauty and stunning color combination. @tonyman121 noted the car's lack of use, while @ME21 described it as a 'beast' and praised the color. @66GTconvorigownr appreciated the car's aesthetic and requested indoor shots to better appreciate its color under different lighting. The seller, @AutofileClassics, enthusiastically promotes the car's condition, noting its limited use of less than 2,900 miles and inviting potential buyers to engage with the auction and explore the extensive visual content provided. Several participants, including @LuvBritCars and @Overextended, shared their positive experiences with similar models, mentioning their outstanding performance and aesthetics.
Neutral: The seller, @AutofileClassics, provides various updates and answers to questions from potential buyers, assuring them about the condition and specifications of the car. Replies to queries raised by users like @kdsimms regarding undercarriage photos and window stickers and to @cranked_up about the factory battery charger show a commitment to offering transparency. Additionally, @earlebird raised a question about the car's registration status, which @AutofileClassics clarified, enabling prospective bidders to make informed decisions. There are ongoing discussions about available features, maintenance history, and warranty information, contributing to a comprehensive overview of the vehicle's credentials.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about specific features or a lack of desired options. For instance, @Chuckster707 expressed disappointment over the absence of 14-way adjustable seats, despite praising the car's interior. @Viper1 and @brianlmccann discussed issues surrounding the start/stop feature, suggesting that it may not be well-received by all owners. Overall, while most remarks are positive, a few users highlighted minor disappointments that potential buyers might consider when evaluating the vehicle.
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its unique retro style, particularly the wheels, referred to as 'Lego wheels' or 'robot wheels'. @BabyD69 called it a 'sick truck', expressing confidence in its market potential. @Discobob highlighted that it was in excellent condition and praised its maintenance, sharing hope for a good outcome in the sale. @CKKurtz commented on its beauty, stating it is one of the best trucks, and others recalled their positive experiences with similar models, showing a strong nostalgic connection to this generation of Nissan trucks. @ActionJackson007, the seller, described it as a preserved time capsule and shared his journey in acquiring it post-surgery, emphasizing its well-kept condition and minimal issues.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions about the vehicle's specifications, particularly its model year and features. @KaptainRyLo questioned whether it was accurately labeled as an SE due to the absence of certain features typically found in that model, while @BleederGS noted that the VIN checked out but pointed out the odd specifications. @forfree09 shared thoughts on how model specifications varied across model years, showing a mix of knowledge and curiosity among the commenters.
Negative: A few commenters expressed skepticism over the vehicle's classification and specifications. @KaptainRyLo's questioning of whether it was genuinely an SE model without power windows suggested doubts about its authenticity. @Jocko315 raised concerns about potential modifications or missing features that could impact the vehicle's original character. Additionally, some nostalgia-laden comments hinted at disappointment over the rarity of quality examples from the era, framing the selling condition as potentially risky for buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the 2007 BMW 328i Sports Wagon, highlighting its excellent condition and unique specifications. @neduro praised it as a lovely example, while @ride1986 mentioned its practicality and enthusiastic driving experience. @jonathanalden noted the utility of the wagon, particularly the six-speed transmission, calling it one of the most practical cars ever built. Commenters like @4Doors and @BXNupe echoed sentiments about its rarity and capability, particularly in snowy conditions, emphasizing its status as a perfect daily driver.
Neutral: In terms of the vehicle's features, some commenters shared mixed feelings about certain aspects. @Mondmann mentioned the lack of an M-package and sport seats, stating that despite the car's great condition, it didn't meet his expectations for a facelift model. @osteome acknowledged this isn't the ultimate-spec option but recognized the overall increasing value of low-mileage E91s. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) provided a comprehensive overview of the car's maintenance history, which includes recent service details and highlights the car's maintained condition.
Negative: On the downside, there were some criticisms regarding missing features. @jpr referred to it as an 'SUV killer' in a context likely suggesting disappointment with its competitive standing. @TheHun99 noted he wasn’t interested due to the wood trim, which isn't to his taste. Additionally, @4Doors expressed disappointment that the original owner didn't order the car with sport seats, reflecting a common wish among enthusiasts for sporting upgrades. Overall, while the vehicle has many fans, some felt it fell short of ideal specifications.
|
|
30k-Mile 2018 Ford F-150 Raptor SuperCrew Hennessey VelociRaptor 600
1FTFW1RG5JFD72981
Lot 206355
Private Party
 |
Positive: @JakeTheSnake115 commented that these vehicles are cool and wished the seller good luck with their sale. @mbartholome praised the great appearance of the Raptor and expressed eagerness about potentially bidding on it, mentioning it would be his fourth Raptor. @The_Gentleman shared their positive experience with a similar truck, noting its reliability and comfort, especially with passengers and dogs, while emphasizing the enjoyable driving experience and performance capability, stating the new owner would be extremely happy with this example.
Neutral: @Rjoubran inquired about the specifics of an accident involving the vehicle, seeking clarity on what parts were changed due to the damage. @morrisonquatro raised an honest question regarding the reliability of finding a dependable truck for a family vehicle without being outbid by dealers. @SofiaLeo asked for the height of the truck, to which @jaywolco provided an answer of 79 inches for roof clearance, while also stating that no dyno test had been conducted since ownership, but noting that the Hennessey upgrade advertised 600 horsepower.
Negative: @jaywolco informed that the vehicle had 'minor' damage reported in May 2023, detailing that the rear and right rear were affected without airbag deployment. In response to an inquiry about potential mechanical issues, @The_Gentleman advised checking for common problems, like cam phaser issues and sunroof rattles, which could concern potential buyers. @Danteets asked whether the cam phasers had been replaced, to which @jaywolco confirmed they were not aware of any such work done.
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed great nostalgia and appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its historical significance and practical features. @sbudennis mentioned feeling immediate joy upon viewing the ad, while @Vintage1956 praised its combination of space and efficiency, noting that no modern vehicle matches its virtues. @robbiefarmer and @Tom_S. shared that the van is visually appealing and durable, with @David_P acknowledging its perfect size for a small van. This minivan was recognized as a crucial part of automotive history, with @Tripledigit fondly recalling family road trips in a similar model and others like @bondgraham playfully asserting that everyone secretly wants one, reflecting on its practicality and legacy.
Neutral: A few comments provided supplemental insights without strong emotional reactions. @NelsonAutomotive (The Seller) confirmed various features and historical anecdotes, including the vehicle's rust condition typical for Illinois cars and how parts of the headliner were secured due to sagging. @Paul_B outlined the vehicle’s historical context, stating how it outperformed SUVs in popularity and practicality at the time of its launch, while also discussing the evolution of minivan design. Commenters including @lunchbocks2002 and @ketch347 offered international perspectives regarding the model's appeal across different markets, noting its innovative design features and prior transformations.
Negative: Some comments pointed out the van's limitations and the fading appreciation for minivans in contemporary culture. @MarkS reflected on the utilitarian nature of the vehicle, suggesting it was overlooked and often dismissed as unglamorous. Both @JayKay2430 and @lovebohn expressed concerns over the vehicle's condition, mentioning typical rust issues and questioning the state of components like the headliner. @otherbuyer28 and @RevMedia requested details about specific features, which indicates scrutiny towards the vehicle's current functionality, highlighting that while it has a rich history, modern expectations could influence its perceived value.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Creceveur described the vehicle as a "Sweet rig!" showing enthusiasm about its design. @stugottz expressed a desire to take the vehicle to Silver Lake sand dunes, indicating it would be an exciting experience. Furthermore, @J_tonyperez (The Seller) highlighted the vehicle's high-quality roll cage made by Evol Offroad, praising it as one of the best in the industry.
Neutral: @NPB asked about the width from outer wheel to outer wheel and inquired if the vehicle had any heating or enclosure. @jfishoff2 wanted clarity on whether the vehicle is street legal, while @DEVILDOG1983 questioned what requirements exist to make it street legal. @skisnowy showed curiosity about the vehicle's low mileage, and @LorenPaul noted that laws about road usage differ between California and Arizona.
Negative: @J_tonyperez (The Seller) confirmed the vehicle is not street legal, which could deter potential buyers looking for a versatile vehicle. @eecastro inquired about sand paddles, which are not included, while @johnnytabs wanted to know about the cost of modifications but received no clarity on the original MSRP. There was also mention of the clutch and air intake cover being available, suggesting that parts might be a concern for some potential buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Jive describes the vehicle as a rare find and expresses excitement about its desirability, particularly noting that if it were offered with a manual transmission, it would be a car they would keep for life. @708uvr appreciates the vehicle's fuel efficiency, claiming it routinely achieves 35 MPG, while highlighting its quick and thrifty characteristics. @Boatymcboatface acknowledges this specific diesel model as a sensible choice, deeming it a nice example and inquiring about service records, reflecting an overall positive sentiment about the car's qualities.
Neutral: @Belair1900 comments on the cleanliness of the car and asks whether it has a backup camera, suggesting a neutral curiosity rather than a strong opinion. @aegmotorsports (The Seller) responds with information about the vehicle's specifications and features, assuring potential buyers of its condition with clarity and openness about its service records and equipment. This communication reflects the seller's intent to provide transparency and support to prospective buyers by answering queries and sharing essential details about the vehicle.
Negative: @PlaneJunk raises concerns about visible dings and scratches, specifically noting the need for better pictures to assess the vehicle's condition, which suggests a level of apprehension about the vehicle's exterior. @snowtire inquires about whether the vehicle has been smoked in, implying a concern over potential odors and interior quality. These comments from @PlaneJunk and @snowtire create a negative tone regarding the vehicle's perceived condition and cleanliness.
|
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters appreciate the condition and history of the vehicle, noting that it has been well-serviced and is ready for many more miles. @Youngtimerclassics calls it a "beautiful XJ8" and praises its readiness for the next owner. @wallen1130 (The Seller) highlights the professional maintenance and the care taken with its exterior and interior, emphasizing the use of high-quality parts which contributes to the vehicle's overall quality and condition that one expects from a Jaguar.
Neutral: Commenters have posed questions regarding specific features and parts of the vehicle, indicating curiosity about its components. @MoeLuvs inquires about the reupholstered items and provides insights about common repairs related to the model, while @rlacin asks if the car has the original air suspension and whether there are any oil leaks. The seller provides clarifications on the maintenance performed, including the replacement of the air suspension compressor, and reassures potential buyers about its current condition and lack of leaks.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised regarding the overall maintenance history and potential future repairs. @scottybmdmup mentions significant expenditures on repairs from 2021 to 2025, expressing astonishment at the high costs associated with maintaining the vehicle. Minor issues are also noted, such as errors associated with the suspension and the car not opening the center console, although @scottybmdmup remains hopeful about driving it as long as possible. Overall, while the comments reveal a well-regarded vehicle, the history of repair costs raises some caution among potential buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is garnering interest for its classic design and performance capabilities, highlighted by @Euro_Classica (The Seller) who mentions unique options like Limited Slip Differential and Traction control. The 996 Coupe showcases a blend of traditional Porsche analog feel with modern usability, making it a considered choice for potential daily drivers. Commenters like @radcrujones appreciate its aesthetics and express that it is a good-looking car, suggesting positive perception among those who admire its design.
Neutral: Several commenters are seeking specific information regarding the car's maintenance history and current condition. @lesr3204 notes the lack of comprehensive maintenance records but acknowledges the car's mileage and potential upkeep needs. Others, like @jason129 and @kevin3681, are especially concerned about the Intermediate Shaft (IMS) bearing and clutch replacement history, which are common points of inquiry for 996 models. Meanwhile, @cantaffordit24 finds the aftermarket test deck lid visually appealing, showing an appreciation for the modifications made to the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's service history are prominent, as indicated by @lesr3204, who points out the absence of detailed maintenance records on Carfax, particularly for crucial components that may need attention. There's robust inquiry about the IMS bearing, as multiple commenters, including @bearandotis, and @kevin3681, repeatedly question whether it has been replaced, underscoring anxiety about potential mechanical issues with the car. @242bryan echoes concerns about overall communication and specific functionality like air conditioning, which can affect buyer confidence.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Sans expresses a strong fondness for the vehicle, considering it second on their list of favorites and reminiscing about a similar Italian model they once adored. @shervinator praises the auction presentation as excellent, while @Rammstein believes the car surpasses its factory condition and highlights its rarity. Enthusiast comments from @Spudster and @alskin reflect their nostalgic experiences with the model, amplifying its fun reputation. @dherr2 shares personal success stories about owning and upgrading X1/9s, recommending a source for parts.
Neutral: @MPC_Concierge (The Seller) provides thorough details about the vehicle, including potential viewing options and readiness to answer questions. Several comments inquires into specific technical aspects, such as the engine's oil leakage, maintenance history, and A/C functionality. Both @claymayshun and @Gathered-Rosebuds ask for additional photos of potential rust areas, indicating a level of cautious interest from potential buyers. The positive responses to these inquiries suggest an engaged but slightly reserved interest in the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @Harley64 raises concerns about visible wear, oil leakage, and surface rust, questioning the authenticity of the car's mileage. @0die remarks critically on the interior state despite giving it a high value impression. @Gathered-Rosebuds and @Btats voice worries about rust in specific areas and seek confirmation of the car's maintenance history, suggesting that the lack of substantiated mileage records raises red flags for them. This caution emphasizes an underlying apprehension regarding the car's overall history and condition.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Supraman praises the LC200 for being very clean, especially given its mileage, and appreciates the tasteful modifications like the lift and wheel/tire setup. @FXRcR1 notes the immaculate condition of the interior, highlighting its resilience against dirt. Other comments, including those from @OneInABlueMoon and @Bullish, echo this sentiment, expressing admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and quality. @GattoVeloce shares a positive driving experience in a similar model, emphasizing its smooth handling and comfort, making it suitable for daily use.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's history and condition come from various users seeking clarification from the seller. @aj_rice3 requests confirmation about the paint's condition, while @callie r) speculates about a possible rear-end hit. @bretervin10 (The Seller) addresses these inquiries, asserting that the truck's condition is very good overall, and elaborating on minor scratches and cosmetic issues. Other inquiries about the originality of parts, such as the radiator and underbody damage, lead to straight-forward responses from the seller, providing transparency about the vehicle's maintenance and past conditions.
Negative: Concerns emerge mainly about the vehicle's potential hidden issues. @garrettjmu brings up the drivers' side bumper gap, and @dstewart3ss questions the originality of the radiator, implying possible replacements. @LCBest's question about rubbing with the tire size suggests cautiousness about possible operational flaws. Additionally, questions arise about whether the vehicle has been smoked in or has pet odors, with @RickStar voicing apprehension over interior conditions, despite the seller's reassurances.
|
|
 |
Positive: @PandJ expresses admiration for the vehicle's design, calling it a remarkable build infused with passion. @Collins4A and @dsil3000 share similar sentiments, praising the thematic inspiration drawn from the Harley and MG legacies, while @Miatadon humorously coins the hybrid name "Harlet." Commenters like @David_C. highlight its creativity and uniqueness, placing it among the most unconventional builds they have witnessed in the custom car community. Overall, the excitement around this vehicle stems from its distinct fusion of motorcycle and car, reflecting innovative risk-taking in automotive design.
Neutral: Many commenters are curious about the structural and functional elements of the vehicle, akin to @MGB6 asking for a closer look at the pedal assembly, while others inquire about the vehicle's reverse feature. @ConsoleTVMan seeks clarification on the purpose of the wooden bow behind the seat, reflecting a general intrigue about its engineering and usability. The vehicle prompts multiple discussions around the driving experience; some regard it as a piece of art that blends different auto cultures, while @Milage critiques its design philosophy, encapsulating mixed feelings regarding its practicality on the road.
Negative: Conversely, critical voices emerge, with @hacker_jay doubting the vehicle's reliability due to its modification from two distinct automotive heritages. @WNP questions the rationale behind such a build, reflecting skepticism about its practicality and performance. Detractors like @arcturus note potential issues, such as the vehicle's vibrations and questions about its driveline components, casting doubt on its viability as a daily driver. Overall, a number of commenters see the build as excessively radical, leading to concerns about its overall functionality on the street.
|
|
 |
Positive: @specialkjupiter describes the vehicle as a "very very nice example," indicating a favorable impression of its condition. Additionally, @4WHEEL_GERMAN confirms that the car does not have leaks from the ABC suspension system or any other fluids and that there are no fault codes or warning lights, which suggests good functionality and reliability of those systems. The seller also mentions that all the interior electric functions are operational, as confirmed in a response to @MelodyA.
Neutral: @Letz-Jet and @kp2 ask pertinent questions regarding the maintenance history of the vehicle, specifically inquiring about the servicing of the ABC suspension and the status of various mechanical components such as cam adjusters and head bolts. @Ginoandjr also queries about service records, noting the discrepancy in Carfax records until 48,000 miles. @Heimdal’s request for photos of the front bumper scuffs and a list of options reflects a desire for more detailed information about the car's condition and features, which the seller has not yet provided.
Negative: @Letz-Jet and @kp2 raise concerns about potential maintenance issues that may affect the vehicle's reliability, highlighting previous problems some parts have had as noted in the discussions. The lack of service records available to the seller, as pointed out in responses, may leave potential buyers feeling uncertain about the car's previous maintenance history and overall care. Additionally, @Heimdal's request for paint meter readings implies concerns about possible cosmetic issues that are not fully addressed by the current information provided.
|
|
 |
Positive: Comments about this 1997 Dodge Ram 2500 HD SLT Laramie highlight its exceptional condition and desirability among truck enthusiasts. @bosshoss3406pack shared appreciation for the truck's clean appearance, calling it a 'nice clean and special Ram' that will stand the test of time. @Wolfenhaus remarked on the trucks being awesome, while @onlyhonda4me emphasized the unique experience of driving a Ram Cummins stick-shift, suggesting it's a must-try for any car enthusiast.
Neutral: Some commenters expressed curiosity about specific features and details regarding the truck's condition. @shkayb95 asked several questions about maintenance and features such as the killer dowel pin, AC functionality, and potential leaks. @Mjclassictrucks (The Seller) responded promptly, reassuring potential buyers that the truck has been well-maintained with the dowel pin issue addressed, and indicated that relevant videos showcasing the truck would be uploaded soon to assure buyers of its features and condition.
Negative: However, there were a few concerns raised regarding mechanical history and specific details about the vehicle. @jcg9 expressed confusion about previous repairs and their implications on the vehicle's reliability, while @leroycordova questioned areas of sheet metal in the pictures, fearing possible issues. These concerns reflect the common apprehension potential buyers might have when considering a used vehicle.
|
|
17-Mile 2023 Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack Widebody Swinger Edition 6-Speed
2C3CDZFJ1PH562960
Lot 206332
Private Party
 |
Positive: @RichBrit and @BrazenHead praise the vehicle's appearance, referring to it as a "great looking car." @Hogdaddy expresses his love for the vehicle, stating it is "absolutely fantastic." @Cullier reminisces fondly about his previous car and compliments this model's beauty and fun driving experience. Additionally, @CDehne notes that the manual transmission enhances driving enjoyment and the car's color looks even better in person. @dzguy acknowledges @newcarpro's impressive vehicle description and commends the seller for presenting a beautiful car.
Neutral: Comments provide insightful information regarding the vehicle's specifications and history. @Rajunz shares that the car is one of only 200 produced in a specific color, emphasizing its rarity. @newcarpro lists abundant features and standard equipment of the vehicle, detailing everything from the engine to the interior. @jgillespie740 expresses curiosity about the vehicle's shaker setup, prompting a response from the seller that clarifies its functionality and aesthetic appeal.
Negative: @onepunch expresses skepticism about the car not being sold, suggesting it might go RNM (Reserve Not Met) due to high market adjustment fees. @redbull1790 echoes this sentiment, pointing out that lower mileage collectors attract RNM situations. @mnext02 raises a concern regarding California emissions compliance, questioning regulatory adherence. This highlights a potential issue with the vehicle's usability in certain markets, possibly affecting its desirability.
|
|
 |
Positive: @mynameistimo commented, "It moved," indicating a favorable aspect of the vehicle's performance. @rodeorife offered compliments on the vehicle's specifications, saying, "Nice spec – GLWTS." Furthermore, @Dodge_guy referred to the vehicle as "Absolutely beautiful," praising its color combination as the best. @9literviper expressed a fondness for the yellow and black Gen 2 ACRs, highlighting their appeal. @waterpointemc vouched for the vehicle's quality, emphasizing that it can be purchased with confidence due to the expertise of the Viper technician maintaining it. @HeyNk noted that it was one of the cleanest Vipers he has ever seen, further underscoring the vehicle's pristine condition. Other commenters also appreciated the rarity and uniqueness of this particular model.
Neutral: @Jametemp inquired whether the seller had the original ACR seat belts, indicating a consideration of functionality and completeness of the vehicle. @ZackS29 requested to see a startup and driving video, suggesting a desire for more firsthand information about the car's operation. @PrinceDeadpool raised potential concerns by asking about known issues related to the vehicle, reflecting a common curiosity among car buyers. Additionally, @newcarpro provided the VIN and vehicle specifications, which may be useful for someone researching the car's background, demonstrating a neutral interest in the details without overt enthusiasm or negativity. @DRR1, the seller, responded to queries and confirmed the maintenance status and history of the car while inquiring about the audience's interest.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @PrinceDeadpool regarding the vehicle's coolant system, which he noted has needed servicing multiple times, suggesting potential maintenance issues that could worry prospective buyers. Meanwhile, @sserafini pointed out the discrepancy in value perception of Gen II ACRs compared to other models, expressing surprise over their current lower market values versus the production numbers. This comment indicates a possible undervaluation of the car that could lead to negative implications for its desirability in the long term. Overall, while positive sentiments dominated, there were hints of caution and inquiry about the vehicle's reliability and market perception.
|
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle for its striking appearance, particularly its vibrant red color which many felt was brought to life beautifully by the photographer's work. @CJIIIFS noted the appeal of the red exterior paired with the red interior, calling it one of their favorite specifications. @doorite1 expressed their admiration by simply stating the car is 'STUNNING!!' while @Leiniesbuddy complemented the vehicle's design despite expressing some unfamiliarity with the Z06 model. @Joey93 (The Seller) emphasized the car's incredible performance capabilities by stating that it smoke's Lamborghinis, further enhancing the allure of this high-end sports car.
Neutral: The car's history has been a topic of interest, especially with @lippy raising questions about its previous registration and warranty status. @Joey93 (The Seller) clarified that he purchased the car at an auction and had not registered it in California yet, despite it being eligible. There was a discussion on the warranty, with multiple commenters expressing doubt about its validity due to the car's auction history. @JHBBII provided insights into the current market for Z06s, highlighting dealership practices and customer experiences regarding warranties and vehicle flipping, indicating a complex market landscape.
Negative: Concerns about the warranty and the implications of the car being flipped shortly after purchase were raised repeatedly, particularly by @lippy who questioned how the warranty remains intact under such circumstances. @jason_tyler89 expressed skepticism about the reliability of claiming to "smoke Lambos" with so few miles on the car, indicating a lack of confidence in the vehicle's break-in period details. Additionally, @lippy asked pointed questions about brake replacements, further showcasing the anxieties surrounding the car's history which may deter potential buyers.
|
|
 |
Positive: @RockyVolvo89 expressed well wishes for the seller, @AdamBorowiak, showing support for his listing. This sentiment illustrates a positive community atmosphere surrounding the sale. @DanTheManIOM complimented the car's cleanliness, suggesting that it is among the best examples of a 240 wagon he has seen, which highlights the vehicle's appeal and desirability. @Ycbmsma also provided helpful advice affirming the utility of the snow tires already fitted on the car, indicating the seller has maintained the vehicle well for winter driving conditions.
Neutral: Several comments focused on specific inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and features. @letthegypsyhaveit asked whether the hubcaps were OEM and requested pictures of the cargo space with the rear seats folded down, showing a practical interest in the car's functionality. @UscPhd97_ inquired about the A/C and radio code, while other users like @jrkgalant questioned the tire size, suggesting that they might have looked undersized for the car. @AdamBorowiak, the seller, responded affirmatively to these questions, ensuring potential buyers have accurate information regarding the vehicle's condition and specifications, particularly about tire fitment and A/C functionality.
Negative: @jrkgalant pointed out that the vehicle's tires appeared small and that this could cause inaccuracies with the speedometer and odometer, an important detail for any potential buyer. Similarly, @Ycbmsma warned about the potential hazards of driving M&S-rated tires in warm weather, based on personal experience, which could raise concerns about the overall safety and practicality of the vehicle. These comments indicate that while the car has many positive attributes, there are also considerations and potential downsides that buyers should be aware of.
|
|
 |
Positive: @svatem calls the vehicle "Pretty Nifty!" and believes it could be a show-winner for the lucky buyer. @Old_Ned praises the pickup for its accurate details, suggesting it may have been restored for judging, while also noting unique features like valve stems and coolant hoses. @mobilhomey describes it as "Absolutely beautiful" and a great example from its era, complimenting the restoration and color choices. Many others, like @mtrctylarry, affirm its top-quality, likening it to something that would appear in the Henry Ford Museum, and @SteveMack_CT remarks on its impressive color combo, considering it one of the best among available Model As.
Neutral: The seller, @lclassic, provides clarifications regarding the vehicle's title and registration, confirming to @mobilhomey that there are no registration issues and the title matches the frame stamping shown in the gallery. @shelbymann70 inquires if the vehicle is at the seller's classic dealership or late model dealerships, to which @lclassic responds affirmatively about it being at the Milford location. Various commenters like @carnut21 request additional videos, leading to the seller uploading cold start and driving videos, showcasing more about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @1957Vintage raises concerns about gear grinding, specifically when shifting into first gear from a dead stop, questioning how much of the vehicle's sheet metal is original or reproduction. @MarkE77 offers a technical explanation for the grinding, blaming it on the driver's technique rather than the vehicle itself, while @Old_Ned adds that the Model A's transmission lacks synchronizers which contributes to the issue. Some commenters express their concerns over aesthetics, such as @Richard who criticizes overly flashy colors or customization, reflecting a desire for authenticity in classic vehicles.
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are praising the Ferrari F355 Berlinetta for its beauty and class. @oldman40 notes that the car is aging like fine wine, while @Caymanorcarrera appreciates its aesthetic over other models. Many share fond memories of driving Ferraris, like @simbad, who describes the Berlinetta as a highlight of a driving experience, emphasizing its stunning design and fulfilling driving sound. Others like @boaboyoz refer to it as a divine specimen, and @alicep mentions that the car, much like herself, is aging gracefully. General admiration is evident, especially for the gated shifter, with @jaylifeee expressing an obsession with its tactile driving experience.
Neutral: The Seller, @Mintcoimports, actively engages with potential buyers, providing information and encouragement. They confirm that the F355 can be sold to California buyers and mention the necessary compliance process for smog checks. Several commenters have asked technical questions, like @kilof16 inquiring about compression and leak-down numbers, and @irresponsible asking for paint meter readings, indicating some level of seriousness from interested parties needing more information. While these queries reflect interest, they also highlight the due diligence expected from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised about potential repairs, particularly regarding the front bumper; @Pikemike speculates about repair costs, and @Shawh mentions the expense of replacing the bumper cover. @Bluedevils3615 humorously exaggerates the repair cost, which reflects some apprehension about the car's current state. Additionally, @buysellwinlose questions the age of the tires, indicating potential maintenance concerns. Despite these worries, the overall sentiment towards the vehicle remains positive, suggesting that while issues may exist, they do not overshadow the admiration for the car.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Milotic expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting that it is a beautiful final model year for the 250C. @JColinP praised the car's amazing condition and appealing color combination, despite mentioning a slight distortion due to camera settings. @cw3 also commented positively on the car, reflecting on a previous sighting of a similar model and expressing interest in its appeal as a hard top convertible.
Neutral: @jkhtex (The Seller) confirmed that the car is available to see in person, located in Northern California. They provided information on the service history of the vehicle, stating that all required checks have been conducted since ownership began in 2015 with service records available. @Gg2012 showed interest in specific details about tree sap spots, and @jkhtex addressed these inquiries directly, explaining the context of the car's care and location, including insights into weather conditions affecting the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the presence of tree sap spots on the vehicle, with @Gg2012 questioning whether the sap had damaged the clear coat in multiple areas. Additionally, @wasthehobbit inquired about the car's title status, leading to @jkhtex's explanation of a misplaced original title. @cw3 also expressed skepticism about the service history visibility on the Carfax report, questioning the services performed and the implications of tree sap stains despite the use of a car cover.
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beautiful design and interesting heritage. @augopher remarked on the car's beauty and unique history, while @dherr2 shared that he owns a similar 57 smallmouth and looks forward to following this auction. @BigCanoe complimented the car's stunning blue color and the beautiful interior, inquiring about the original features. Commenters like @Dr.T found the color combination appealing and noted the fascinating aspect of CKD cars, while @Kavco appreciated the restoration, noting that the car captures its original beauty.
Neutral: The seller, @jimcor, welcomed inquiries about the vehicle, providing context about his decision to sell due to downsizing. He shared the car's history, including its original parts, such as the steering wheel and bumper, and explained the challenges related to acquiring a Heritage Certificate for KD cars. The conversation included technical aspects of the vehicle, such as the steering dynamics and conversion possibilities for right-hand drive, with others like @Jchistia asking about the steering system conversion and @Carmeister noting the new fasteners and improved braking system.
Negative: Some comments expressed concerns about the car's condition and potential issues. @genesimon questioned the paint quality, suggesting that reflections in the photos might obscure imperfections. There were also discussions about the complexities of removing and replacing components like the front nose clip, prompting concerns about potential paint damage. Additionally, comments indicated a general apprehension about the right-hand drive feature and how that might affect market interest, with some commenters speculating about the car's performance and usability in the U.S.
|
|
 |
Positive: The 2017 Porsche Macan S auctioned by @ExclusiveMotorClub is highlighted as a well-cared-for, one-owner vehicle with a clean Carfax and an impressive service history. @ExclusiveMotorClub reassures potential buyers by stating that the vehicle shows no current issues and emphasizes its maintenance at authorized Porsche service centers. They are open to questions and willing to provide additional information, demonstrating transparency and willingness to assist interested bidders during the auction process.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Axlereid and @ron1999, raise important questions regarding the vehicle's servicing history, particularly about major services like the 40k and the timing cover bolts. @ExclusiveMotorClub responds by explaining that the 40k service and others were completed previously, yet they acknowledge the need to confirm specific details. @perskold123 seeks clarification about the Porsche Approved Certified Pre-Owned status and keys, indicating the interest in the vehicle's warranty and accessories.
Negative: Some concerns were expressed by potentially wary buyers such as @Axlereid, who pointed out that significant services recommended by Porsche had not been performed, bringing up the high costs associated with such maintenance. Similarly, @maxxBerlin questioned the clarity of the vehicle's Certified Pre-Owned status, expressing confusion over whether the necessary inspections were completed. These concerns highlight potential red flags regarding the vehicle's servicing history that might deter some bidders.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Dhenkel (The Seller) describes the bike as beautiful and notes its amazing condition, emphasizing the tires which, despite being original, show no signs of dry rot due to limited sun exposure. This speaks to the overall care and quality of the vehicle, which likely adds to its appeal for potential buyers.
Neutral: @rlikis inquires about the Gold Key Edition, indicating an interest in knowing more about the model's specifics. @brian_johnson62 asks whether the tires are original, showing curiosity about the bike's components without any judgment or bias. These questions help provide clarity on the bike's authenticity and history.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle in the provided interactions. All comments reflected curiosity or admiration, with no criticisms expressed.
|
|
 |
Positive: @Gdaddy comments on the stunning color combination of the Vanquish and expresses excitement that it still retains all original accessories. @David993S also remarks on the great looks of the early Vanquish. @Baldbear adds that Aston Martin cars are never unattractive. @queenelizabeth3 praises the beauty of the car and emphasizes the low temp tag fee, suggesting that this fee should not deter potential buyers who understand the costs of maintaining an exotic car.
Neutral: @smartguy1014, the seller, explains that the $57.50 doc fee is standard for all buyers as a temporary tag charge, indicating that it is required by law. He assures the community that he runs a transparent operation, mentioning that he has sold cars on Bring a Trailer for years without issue. @rcwoodjr expresses that while the fee is not substantial, it represents an ongoing concern in the community over additional dealer fees. This sentiment is echoed by @surffly, who questions the necessity of such a fee, while @blackjags acknowledges the reality of fees in car buying.
Negative: @surffly expresses that the doc fee is a major turn off, suggesting it should have been included in the sale price. @rcwoodjr mentions that the principle of charging extra fees runs counter to the values of the Bring a Trailer community, highlighting an underlying issue with transparency. Additionally, @EMHDAD finds humor in the doc fee but notes that the seller's reasoning makes sense, indicating a mixed sentiment among buyers regarding added costs.
|
|
|
|