Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: @weswheelw68 expresses enthusiasm for the manual transmission, highlighting its rarity. The Seller, @J3ast, provides detailed information about the vehicle's history and maintenance, mentioning that it has been well cared for under current ownership. They assure interested buyers that the car is ready for a new enthusiast home, which resonates positively with potential buyers who value transparency and upkeep.
Neutral: The Seller, @J3ast, answers various inquiries about the vehicle's condition, including the functioning of the roof and sunroof. They confirm that both are in good operating order and promise to provide videos demonstrating their functionality. @McLovin678 inquires about a driving video, to which @J3ast agrees to add by the next day, showcasing their responsiveness to potential buyer requests.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the passenger side flap of the roof, which @J3ast admits can stick and may require manual adjustment. While they acknowledge that this issue is easily remedied, it could be seen as a drawback for those seeking a perfect vehicle. Additionally, @augerbit raises questions about the car's ability to drive cross country, seeking reassurance about its condition and any potential leaks, indicating a cautious approach from potential buyers.
 |
 |
Positive: @htron435, the seller, describes the 2004 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Commemorative Edition as a fantastic driving experience with a tight suspension and intoxicating sound. He believes it is the best iteration of the C5 generation, designed to be driven, and emphasizes the vehicle's robust performance with 405 horsepower and a 0-60 time of just 4 seconds. Additionally, commenters like @Tobyallen express their admiration, noting that the car is enjoyable to drive and a great representation of an analog driving experience, perfect for enthusiasts who appreciate cars for their performance rather than merely for show.
Neutral: Commenters have raised various thoughts regarding the condition of the car, particularly concerning some signs of corrosion and wear due to its previous exposure to the elements. @B206L4 and @Chasboy1 mention issues like rust on seat anchor bolts and pitting on aluminum parts, indicating that the car may have been improperly stored, while others acknowledge the car's solid performance capabilities. Concerns about cosmetic issues such as pitting on metal parts and the condition of the tires were also discussed, with some commenting that such wear is common for vehicles of this age and mileage.
Negative: Some participants have expressed visible concerns about the corrosion and overall condition of the vehicle. @B206L4 mentions excessive moisture exposure, pointing out rust and pitting on various parts, while @Tobyallen notes the tarnished condition of the alternator housings as a sign of inadequate storage. These comments suggest that despite the low mileage of 14K, the car has not been kept in ideal conditions, leading to potential worries for prospective buyers regarding maintenance and performance down the line.
|
 |
Positive: @CarFoolLane appreciates the uniqueness of Buick cars from this era, highlighting their interesting designs. @jwcunningham65 commends the nostalgic early 90s style, wishing for more well-preserved models instead of today's SUV offerings. @MidCenturyMillennial and @joeveto find the white color refreshing compared to the traditionally seen Reatta Red, noting that it enhances the vehicle's aesthetic. @Ohjai shares their enjoyment of driving their Reattas, bringing positive sentiments from personal experience. @Craven praises the performance of the Buick motor, mentioning it offers good power around town, resonating with fans of classic Buicks.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @kink56, provide observations about the vehicle's condition, such as the sun-damaged interior and the missing center stack cover, indicating minor areas of wear and tear typical for older cars in warm climates. The presence of aftermarket features such as the R12 A/C system is noted by @perfectphoto (The Seller), who also addresses questions regarding the vehicle's condition and operations, maintaining transparency with potential buyers. Additionally, @4RINGSx3 shares personal history with a similar model, highlighting the memories associated with the vehicle type while asking about included accessories that typically accompany such cars.
Negative: @kink56 mentions the need for minor repairs, including issues with taillights and the front fascia cover, as well as the need for parts that might not be readily accessible. @OttoPhile critiques the design of the pop-up headlights, expressing concerns about their functionality and wind resistance, calling it the worst solution imaginable. @piercethekiki mistakenly comments about the coolant temperature reading, suggesting confusion or lack of clarity in the video presentation concerning the car's operational status.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's solid condition and lack of major rust issues. @BeastRig referred to it as a 'beast of a rig,' highlighting its strong presence. @CFGRich (The Seller) reassured potential buyers that the truck is solid, mentioning it has no rust holes, only some light surface rust from paint wear, which underscores the vehicle's overall quality after eight years of his ownership.
Neutral: Some commenters were looking for additional details on the vehicle's maintenance and condition. @Jimmy_21 inquired about the brake and suspension work, as well as the engine overhaul mentioned in the ad. @Bell_Diver requested clarification on the A/C system's inoperability, seeking specifics about its diagnosis and history. @DStone4320 also asked for clarifying images of the body and chassis, emphasizing the need to understand the rust conditions and receive additional insights on the vehicle's maintenance history.
Negative: There are some lingering concerns regarding the vehicle's mechanical history and maintenance. @Jimmy_21 was skeptical about the claims of an engine overhaul in the absence of detailed records, questioning how effective this claim could be. @Demoner1 raised questions about the A/C system and the steering column's stability, suggesting common issues that these vehicles may face. Additionally, @campbell2209 pointed out a perceived rust issue in the tailgate seam, highlighting potential neglect in upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz calls the Solar Yellow Senna GTR sensational, describing it as fierce, fast, and fantastic. @TommyBruin admires its Boston Bruins livery, adding to the vehicle's overall appeal. @Hoppy18 expresses excitement at the car's unveiling and @blacknyellow considers it a work of art that deserves to be driven, further supported by @MWCRLN who acknowledges its gorgeous design. Several commenters, like @HeyNk, appreciate that it serves buyers looking for something more subtle, while others, such as @carguychase, wish for a racing series dedicated to this remarkable car.
Neutral: Commenters displayed interest in the vehicle's specifications and components, including @RoyToy2003 questioning if the LM spec motor is included in the sale, which was confirmed by @casciomotors (The Seller) that shipping and installation were not included. Concerns were raised about the differences in the value and legality of the GTR as noted by @rainnothing and @MWCRLN, recognizing the GTR’s user-friendliness compared to the regular Senna. @Dcd0611 and @Shelby314159 sought clarification about engine inclusion and upgrades that could be made to the car.
Negative: Some users shared their reservations about specific features of the vehicle. @Rocco99 and @Sixtyvalve expressed disappointment about the automatic transmission, wishing it had a manual gearbox for a more engaging driving experience. This sentiment was echoed by @Jack-Porsche, who believed a manual would enhance the vehicle's appeal. Other commenters such as @Bulltard noted the car's lack of street legality and the limited buyer pool, and @Preluder suggested it might be more of a car one buys to admire rather than drive, indicating skepticism about its practical utility.
|
 |
Positive: @Dspoljaric praises the vehicle as a beautiful E30 with thoughtfully sourced modifications, remarking on the passion behind the build. @JGraham describes the E30 coupe as stunning, particularly admiring its headers and suggesting that whoever wins the auction is getting an excellently tailored car. Enthusiasts like @rsabeebe, who has owned multiple E30 models, notes their durability and driving pleasure, also recognizing its appealing modern upgrades like the bumpers and sport seats. @thesheikh shares a personal endorsement, stating the car is how E30s should have been designed from the factory, emphasizing its quality. @Dspoljaric, @Siebenthal, @garagewelt, and others highlight the vehicle's modifications and visual aesthetics, showcasing widespread admiration for its beauty and build quality.
Neutral: @SRLang expresses curiosity about the car's inability to be sold within California, suggesting a simple document acknowledging buyer risk concerning the smog certificate, which @Siebenthal responds to by offering assistance regarding registration options in California. Questions from @ok-johne regarding dyno testing are met with an explanation about missing documentation, alongside a promise for more transparency going forward. @PDX_Keith and others inquire about driving videos, with @Siebenthal consistently responding with promises to provide updates and videos demonstrating the car's performance as requested by the community, indicating ongoing engagement in the sale process.
Negative: Some remarks raise concerns about potential issues, such as @p_hacker noting disappointment about the missing dyno results from the engine build. @mightyj inquires about a banging noise in a driving video, prompting @Siebenthal to assure that the suspension is in good condition, but issues surrounding noise persist in conversations, hinting at unresolved skepticism among viewers. Additionally, @Daveyv points out what appears to be an uneven section on the driver's seat bolster, which @Siebenthal addresses, but notes that he doesn’t perceive the same issue in person or in the provided close-up images.
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) presents a 2008 SL550 with a strong commitment to providing high-quality, unique vehicles sourced from private sellers. They emphasize their dedication to smooth and transparent transactions, which is reflected in their impressive Google Reviews rating of 4.9 out of 5. With hundreds of five-star reviews, they are seen as a trustworthy option for those looking to buy, sell, or consign vehicles. The clear invitation for potential buyers to visit or inspect the car in Douglassville, PA, adds to their credibility, making it easy for interested customers to reach out for further details or to schedule inspections.
Neutral: Several commenters have posed questions about the vehicle's condition, specifically regarding the engine replacement and details surrounding its body control and top mechanism. @KT_sells inquires about the specifics of the engine replacement, while @PondBoss expresses confusion about the listing's mention of an oil change scheduled for February 2025, given the context of the engine issue. Such inquiries suggest a need for clarification on the vehicle's current state and service history without casting judgment on the car's overall value or reliability.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle arise from comments questioning the transparency of the seller. @PondBoss notes a discrepancy related to the vehicle's engine, highlighting a concern about a potentially blown or replaced engine without clear explanations from the seller. Additionally, @Bnicksr's mention of a yellow sticker on the windshield raises further questions, hinting at possible issues within the car that could deter buyers looking for assurance in their investment. There seems to be an undercurrent of skepticism among potential buyers regarding the seller's disclosures.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praised the overall appearance and quality of the vehicle, particularly highlighting its classic color combination of white exterior and red interior. @stugottz expressed enthusiasm for the Camaro's readiness for a road trip, while @Muscleguy69 described it as a 'classy beautiful Camaro' and appreciated its stance. Multiple users, including @chenry210 and @BIGBLOCKJAMO, lauded the build quality and the choice to keep it free from Z-28 stripes, reinforcing the notion of a beautifully understated look. The seller, @fcort7, noted that the car drives well and features a stunning paint job, with an interior that has been updated for comfort.
Neutral: Comments included inquiries about the vehicle's details, such as an alignment concern with the rear bumper raised by @Caffeinated25 and a request for a drive video from @cnj1933. The seller addressed some of these questions, confirming that the car has been well-sorted mechanically and is ready for a drive at highway speeds. @Moparmanbet asked about the engine's RPM at 75 mph, and the seller provided information, contributing to a dialogue about the vehicle's performance.
Negative: There were minimal negative comments, with @ChuckDMSB humorously wishing for a red interior, which may indicate a personal preference rather than a criticism of the car itself. Some users, like @ekotysh, raised concerns about the car's idling and sought clarification, reflecting a cautious stance regarding the vehicle's performance. Overall, the feedback was overwhelmingly positive, with few issues noted.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg described the vehicle as an absolutely stunning combination, expressing admiration for its aesthetic and performance. @ffranktly (The Seller) emphasized the car's excellent driving condition, stating there are no rattles, vibrations, or tire wear and that it has been meticulously maintained, spending nearly $9,000 to perfect it. The car is presented as a 'lifetime car' for the next owner, indicating a strong belief in its quality and reliability.
Neutral: Several comments inquired about essential details regarding the vehicle's lien status and damage report. @DAG3 and @GaryLCrest specifically asked about the lien amount and the relevance of the seller's owed amount to the sale. Also, @okcyprus sought clarification on the car's eligibility for the Porsche Approved Certified Pre-Owned program due to the reported accident, reflecting an interest in warranty and inspection details that could affect potential buyers' decisions.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's reported damage were voiced by multiple commenters, particularly @Williamjweiner and @mblaksley, who requested more information and expressed discomfort due to the lack of clarity. @ffranktly (The Seller) stated attempts to have the car inspected were rebuffed by Porsche and local body shops, leading to skepticism about the vehicle's condition. These uncertainties and the seller's responses to queries about damaging have led to unease among potential buyers, as seen in comments questioning the seller's transparency.
|
 |
Positive: @GDMCHRIZ praises the seller for consistently offering impressive examples of vehicles, while @GDogg describes the car as "fantastic." @Justification shares their personal admiration for the car's aesthetics, noting it fulfills their desire for red leather interiors. @harrisappraisals highlights the low mileage and beautiful specifications of the vehicle, wishing the seller good luck. @boaboyoz calls the vehicle "dead sexy" and congratulates the seller on a stylish offering. @Miamirice expresses affection for the car's appearance, sharing their enjoyment of their own C2S model.
Neutral: @RKR1 questions the absence of detailed service records and mentions potential concerns about maintenance. @TheAutobarnStables (The Seller) responds, clarifying that they lack physical service records but have documented maintenance through Carfax. They also provide reassurance about the vehicle's condition despite RKR1's concerns. The seller invites inquiries and offers to accommodate pre-purchase inspections, while also sharing multimedia content to showcase the vehicle. @Blade raises questions regarding the navigation unit and its compatibility, to which the seller responds affirmatively regarding feature availability.
Negative: @JLP stresses the need for a full pre-purchase inspection, indicating a level of skepticism about the vehicle's condition. @Manotexas accuses JLP of insincerity in their comments, claiming that JLP is not a serious bidder. There are further disagreements in the comments about the expectations for the seller regarding the pre-purchase inspection, with discussions about the PPI responsibilities leading to some contention among commenters. @kkd1 inquires about IMS status, suggesting concerns about reliability that could impact buyer decision-making.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the seller for their engagement and responsiveness to questions about the vehicle. @johnnyvett noted that the seller is doing a great job addressing inquiries, enhancing the overall sale experience. @MartyKC appreciated the interior features, specifically mentioning the nice seats and expressing confidence in the car's performance with a powerful engine and manual transmission, indicating a potential interest in the auction.
Neutral: The comments also included various questions from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @randy1957 inquired about critical operational aspects like the engine's sound and transmission performance, while @LarryCorvette requested specific pictures of the birdcage mounts. @Classic1974 sought information regarding the engine specifications and rebuild history, showing a methodical approach by buyers in assessing the car.
Negative: In contrast, there were some less favorable remarks, such as @MartyKC's note about the manual operation of the headlights, suggesting a flaw in functionality. @Plasticpig humorously mentioned that another commenter, @johnnyvett, would likely refrain from commenting positively on this particular vehicle. Overall, while there are positive sentiments, some lingering doubts about particular features and functionality remain evident.
|
 |
Positive: @savaskoc commented on the vehicle's attractive lighting, indicating a positive visual aesthetic. @Twinpop14 expressed satisfaction with the car's sounds in the test drive video, despite the absence of documentation regarding the IMS bearing service, showing an appreciation for the vehicle. @BlueChipCar (The Seller) reassured potential buyers by stating they would confidently drive the car cross-country without reservations, further instilling trust in the vehicle's reliability.
Neutral: @Crestwood996 raised important questions about the vehicle's paint and service history, seeking clarity on the color match and any potential fluid leaks. @inchoramile asked about the quality of the paint under the wrap, and @Wilfredoruiz sought documentation regarding the IMS replacement and clutch, highlighting potential concerns or considerations for serious buyers. @loganmwilliams requested an AC test, indicating interest in the vehicle's functionality without expressing strong positive or negative sentiments.
Negative: @Lisa77 pointed out the lack of documentation for the IMS replacement, suggesting that it may not be registered, which could be a red flag for potential buyers regarding the vehicle's maintenance history. @BlueChipCar (The Seller) confirmed there was no service tag, which could further concern potential buyers who prioritize verifiable service records. @996Lover2 raised questions about mechanical concerns and preventative maintenance, implying that the vehicle may have issues that could affect long journeys, which reflects a cautious approach to the purchase.
|
LQ9-Powered 1987 Chevrolet V10 Silverado Fleetside Pickup
1GCEV14K1HF405513
Lot 208652
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Truck87 (The Seller) mentioned that the engine has been holding up great with no problems reported, and the previous owner estimated around 140,000 miles on it. @Assam commended the truck's crossover steering and axle upgrades, indicating a positive transformation in the truck's driving experience. @BeastRig described the truck as a 'beast of a rig', highlighting its robust appeal.
Neutral: @Truck87 (The Seller) provided additional details about the truck, noting it comes with 2 ignition keys and 3 door keys. When @moezeee inquired about the dashboard fitment, @Truck87 explained that it is tight but does not fully meet the windshield; he also expressed uncertainty about the requirements for fixing it. Moreover, he clarified that the oil leaks mentioned in the listing are light seepage occurring in multiple locations, and that these tend to stop when the truck is driven regularly.
Negative: @moezeee raised concerns regarding the severity of the oil leaks and the condition of the dashboard fitment, suggesting possible issues that may need addressing. @Truck87 (The Seller) acknowledged that the recent oil change date in the ad was incorrect, having been done on August 9, 2025, indicating a potential mix-up that could raise doubts for potential buyers. Finally, @Steve87gmc asked about the toggle switch near the ashtray, inquiring about the mechanical linkage to the transfer case, hinting at a possible complication in the vehicle's setup.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its excellent condition and the attentive care it has received from its owner, @NevrCM3. @asuresh8 commended the well-maintained E46 M3 and appreciated the detailed listing, mentioning the importance of thorough documentation for bidders. @HTrio noted that the car showcases thoughtful modifications and emphasized the quality of the owner’s maintenance. Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle’s design and performance, noting the reliability and driving pleasure it offers, with @3k6bkAW mentioning the joy of driving it and @lemoo recognizing the importance of the vehicle's components and its impressive inspection reports.
Neutral: Several commenters sought additional information regarding the vehicle's history and maintenance. @asuresh8 raised several inquiries about critical components, such as the rod bearings, the rear subframe, and VANOS details, which @NevrCM3 skillfully addressed. The seller clarified aspects like the original rod bearings and recent mechanical checks, providing peace of mind regarding the vehicle's condition. Additionally, there was a focus on the car's emissions systems, with @gorillajin asking about smog compliance in California and @sdlewis inquiring about interior odors, both of which @NevrCM3 answered positively, maintaining trust in the vehicle's integrity.
Negative: While the overall sentiment was positive, a few commenters expressed concerns about the vehicle's past incidents, as mentioned in @NevrCM3’s clarification regarding reported accidents from CarFax. @HTrio cautioned against directly comparing the E46 M3 with the CSL model, emphasizing that each has unique attributes. @lemoo noted puzzlement over the lack of bidding activity, suggesting that despite the car's clear description and its appealing features, potential buyers might still be hesitant. There is a sense of cautious optimism, with hopes that future bids will reflect the car's worth and the seller’s transparency.
|
 |
Positive: @Scott_S mentioned the vehicle's great color which suits it well, and @e9er echoed this sentiment by expressing love for the color as well. @genevamotorcars, the seller, shared their personal enjoyment of the car, stating, "I absolutely love it, and wish I could keep it!" Many commenters, including @JakeTheSnake115 and @gm_500, praised the vehicle and noted its superior qualities, with @MPreston454 emphasizing that the 392 Jeep is the most enjoyable vehicle they have owned and encouraging potential buyers to focus on enjoyment rather than investment. @jww17 conveyed a similar enthusiasm, mentioning their anticipation to have a new one after losing their previous 392 in a hurricane.
Neutral: Questions about the sale process were raised, with @hansde and @MIKEAC inquiring why the vehicle is listed as being sold by a dealer. @EngineCo345 provided clarification, pointing out that the seller is indeed a private party, while @genevamotorcars confirmed purchasing the car new and selling it due to personal reasons. Comments regarding the vehicle's pricing and its market position were made, with @fjmanzari noting the MSRP of $106k and discussing potential bids. Overall, there was a mix of curiosity and engagement about the selling process, its legitimacy, and the vehicle's value in the current market.
Negative: Concerns arose about the authenticity of the "Final Edition" claims, with commenters like @jeffjeep and @ChrisHamilton expressing skepticism about the reliability of such marketing terms from Stellantis. @GM_500 remarked on the historical tendency of the company to label vehicles as limited or final, only to see them reappear in later model years. Additionally, some comments hinted at potential buyer reservations, like @Bfeasel1 questioning the practicality of the vehicle regarding features such as roof removability, while @redbull1790 humorously reacted to the phrase "acquired new by the owner of the selling dealer" as potentially convoluted.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the 2022 Porsche 911 GT3 Touring, particularly its striking Viola Purple Metallic color. @boaboyoz, @GDogg, and @mburpee all complimented the car's stunning appearance, describing it as breathtakingly beautiful and a true magic spectacle. The seller, 1600veloce, emphasized the great specifications of the vehicle, featuring custom ordering and detailed listings that highlight the car's attractive features, generating enthusiasm among potential buyers.
Neutral: Some comments highlighted the color and design aspects of the car while mentioning various tastes and preferences. @MWCRLN shared their experiences with other Porsche colors, contributing to a discussion about the hues and their classifications. Others like @AlmostThere99 and @Mandinga weighed in on the absence of the Sport Chrono feature, informing other commenters about its aesthetic quality and lack of impact on the performance of the GT3, which brought a deeper level of discussion about features among enthusiasts.
Negative: Conversely, critiques were raised regarding certain aspects of the car, specifically the lack of the Sport Chrono option and the simplicity of its interior. Commenters such as @Blewey expressed disappointment over this absence, feeling it detracted from the car's overall aesthetic. Additionally, @Yiorgo noted a personal preference against the PDK transmission, indicating that it would influence their decision to purchase. These comments revealed that while many admire the color and exterior, considerations about optional features and interior finishes still hold significant weight in the buying decision.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its appeal and practicality, indicating that it is a fun and reliable ATV. @luisr0sa1es emphasizes the vehicle's suitability for new riders, describing it as surprisingly roomy despite its compact design. @Jhammond615 recalls fond memories of their children riding a similar machine for 15 years, expressing a desire to purchase the current model for future generations. Additionally, @bemrfst shares a positive experience with their own ATV, noting its trouble-free operation since it was bought for their son.
Neutral: Some commenters share a balanced view, acknowledging the vehicle’s features while also questioning certain aspects. @G5Nichols inquires about adult comfort on the ATV and receives assurance from @luisr0sa1es about its roominess. @68C10292 raises a thought-provoking point about the necessity of electric starters in modern quads, reminiscing about the simplicity of older models. They also note the potential for the ATV to impart valuable riding skills to young individuals, further adding to the discussion about the utility of the vehicle.
Negative: There aren't many negative comments regarding the vehicle, though some skepticism is introduced by @68C10292 regarding the need for features like electric starters, suggesting that it may complicate what could be a straightforward riding experience. While this comment does not outright criticize the vehicle, it reflects a sentiment that may resonate with purists who prefer simpler designs. Overall, the discussion remains largely positive, with most feedback leaning towards appreciation for the ATV's fun factor and reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg praised the vehicle's striking color combination, specifically noting the Flamenco Red and cream seats with red piping as exceptional. @DoctorC echoed this sentiment, sharing his own experience with the model and suggesting that a few thousand dollars spent on deferred maintenance could result in an enjoyable summer driving experience. @4petesake highlighted the honest presentation of the vehicle, expressing optimism that it could find a deserving new owner, and reinforcing the idea that with a little TLC, it could make for a beautiful touring car for enjoyable outings.
Neutral: @Raffi (The Seller) provided details regarding the vehicle's condition, stating that it has no service records and will require some mechanical attention, particularly related to the air conditioning and emissions pump. He encouraged transparency by inviting potential bidders to ask questions and highlighting that the car is being sold as-is, emphasizing it has great cosmetic qualities but may have mechanical issues typical of a vehicle of its age. The seller also provided insight into the vehicle's features like the rear seat compartment being suitable for grandkids or soft luggage, ensuring potential buyers have a comprehensive understanding of what to expect.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's mechanical issues, with @mdehbn asking about timing chain tensioners and replacement of fuel hoses, while @Bagger56 wanted clarification on the extent of mechanical problems beyond the air conditioning and emissions pump. @E.Bugatti noted a potential issue with the temperature gauge not working during a driving video, and @skookumcat speculated about the failure of the air injection pump, contributing to the check engine light issue. Additionally, @misterautomobile's comments on the wheel choice sparked a defensive response in the seller, suggesting a disagreement over the vehicle’s aesthetic presentation.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a general admiration for the vehicle, particularly its historical significance and classic styling. @JPSO86 appreciated the car, noting that correct "Grande" seat covers are now available, enhancing the vehicle’s appeal. @timster52 shared fond memories of owning three of these models, labeling the "Grande" as a rare and desirable car. The @F58YMustang (The Seller) confirmed that the refurbishment completed recently was thorough, providing receipts and mentioning the working air conditioning, which adds to the car's value for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commentors engaged in discussions regarding features and specifications of the vehicle, with @rfendly inquiring about the Marti report, refurbishment details, and functionality of the AC. @CArmudgeon and @CarFoolLane pointed out the mislabeling of the lights and wheels in the listing, reflecting a keen eye for detail. @F58YMustang (The Seller) addressed these inquiries, sharing the vehicle's assembly details while also clarifying the condition of parts such as the clock and the wheel covers included with the sale, which helped to clarify potential confusion about the car's features.
Negative: There were also some concerns raised, particularly from @rfendly about the car's condition and whether certain parts had been maintained. @F58YMustang (The Seller) acknowledged that the sound quality during the driving video might have negatively impacted perception, comparing it to an old truck, which could deter potential buyers. Overall, while the comments were mostly positive, a few expressed skepticism regarding the car's rarity and condition, indicating that despite its charm and history, potential buyers might still have questions before making a decision.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received praise from numerous commenters for its aesthetic appeal and impressive performance. @Chicanery described it as a "gorgeous example", highlighting the attractive combination of its red interior and silver exterior, which @waypoint66 noted is easy to maintain. Several users expressed their admiration for the car's sound and driving capabilities. For instance, @nofat95 stated that it is a "great driving vehicle" with a pleasing exhaust sound, and @MichaelB enthusiastically referred to it as a "fantastic Porsche" and a wonderful example of the first Boxster rated over 300hp. Additionally, @eddiepaletti remarked that the wheels on older Boxsters greatly enhance their appearance, reinforcing the vehicle's overall appeal.
Neutral: Inquiries regarding technical aspects and maintenance history of the vehicle were prevalent among commenters. @BobbySmith raised questions about the resolution of the passenger side airbag issue, alongside the proper functioning of the Tire Pressure Monitoring (TPM) system, indicating a desire for clarity on the car’s condition. The seller, @Jb2008, provided detailed responses about various maintenance and service records, assuring potential buyers of the car's reliability and condition. Furthermore, comments about tire age and wear, such as from @JoeCar58 and @ZilvinasV, reflected a practical focus on the vehicle's upkeep without alarming concerns, suggesting that the buyers are discerning and informed.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, there were concerns raised regarding certain aspects that potential buyers found troubling. @Quackbury pointed out that four new tires might be necessary due to aging rubber, emphasizing a serious consideration for future maintenance costs. Others, like @sgtiger, requested evidence of the car’s emission state due to potential regulations in their areas. Comments from @rogeral reflected worries regarding wear on the driver's seat bolster, indicating that the vehicle's cosmetic flaws could influence buyer confidence. These critiques suggest that while the car is generally admired, there remain underlying apprehensions about its longevity and condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Bry_Bry mentioned that the truck is truly beautiful, praising the superduty bumper. @BeastRig called it a 'Beast of a rig', indicating strong appreciation for the vehicle's capabilities. Additionally, @Hudsled52 (The Seller) has provided detailed responses confirming the truck's original engine and explaining various upgrades, including the powder-coated bumper and new weatherstripping, which enhance its overall appeal.
Neutral: @WLACA asked about the suspension work and any potential issues with rubber parts, to which @Hudsled52 (The Seller) confirmed that the suspension has new shocks and all rubber bushings are in good condition. @Hudsled52 (The Seller) also clarified that the headlights and grill are from LMC, while responding to questions about the oil change by stating it occurred in July, reinforcing the truck's maintenance history. Likewise, @Chawkins727 inquired about the year of the front bumper, showing interest in the vehicle's details.
Negative: @Hodado raised a concern about whether the flares are hiding any rust, but @Hudsled52 (The Seller) reassured that there is 'NO RUST HIDDEN'. @FrontRangeCollectibles pointed out a lapse in oil changes, questioning if it had been a whole year, which could imply potential maintenance issues. @ScotwithoneT expressed a preference for the original paint scheme and some apprehension towards aftermarket paint, highlighting a degree of skepticism about the truck's current aesthetics.
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics asserts that the car presents as an excellent example of a 560sl, highlighting its condition as one of the most highly serviced examples available in recent listings. The seller notes significant investment made into the car, totaling over $10,000 in preparation for sale, which includes comprehensive checks and enhancements to ensure the vehicle is road-worthy and enjoyable.
Neutral: Various commenters note the overall condition of the vehicle and question specific aspects. @erlftex expresses surprise at the clean engine compartment for a car with 55,000 miles. @bhhumphrey and @wohwagen123 raise questions about the tires and mechanical components like the engine timing chain, indicating a desire for clarity on maintenance history and specifics regarding the car's overall condition.
Negative: @crperry1962 criticizes the body condition, asserting it should be flawless for its mileage and suggesting it was likely not garaged, while @bhhumphrey questions why essentials were seemingly overlooked despite claims of thorough servicing. Additionally, @Feerique points out discrepancies in paintwork, mentioning some parts appear repainted and different shades, which adds to the skepticism about the car's true condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle as a stunning build and a beautiful representation of a classic car. @fast_fred mentioned it as one of the best builds they've seen, while @augopher expressed admiration for the engine's smooth growl. @Mercs5 shared their view of the car as a real deal classic with significant nostalgia, indicating it's well-regarded among enthusiasts. Additionally, @TigerGary labeled it a nice driver quality real Tiger, which he described as the most fun of the breed.
Neutral: Several discussions focus on the historical accuracy of the vehicle's parts and specifications. @Nvboatguy and @HMIHM debated the engine variations related to the Mark I and Mark II Tigers, highlighting the complexities of vintage car specifications. Meanwhile, @waman (The Seller) provided background on the car's history and the inclusion of Alpine parts, noting that while modifications have been made, the car's authenticity remains intact. The conversation also delved into chassis plate details and the era-specific features of the Tiger models, showcasing a community engaged in passionate debate about the vehicle's lineage.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about discrepancies in the car's specifications and parts. @austinhealer criticized the usage of Alpine parts in the vehicle, calling attention to various features that deviated from what would typically be found in a Mk1A Tiger. @Warren pointed out the issues with obtaining original parts and mentioned that many of these cars often have mixed parts ('bitsa'). Additionally, @AlpineJay and @jbbrown1980 discussed possible inaccuracies in the car's interior components, emphasizing that while the vehicle is still a Tiger, it does not fully adhere to original specifications.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters highlighted the stunning design and status of the Jaguar XJ220, calling it an exquisite and beautiful supercar. @boaboyoz described it as "absolutely stunning" and "cool AF," while @CarCrazy24 placed it in the top 10 most beautiful cars of all time. @Mike_Breinin emphasized the impressive power of the car, noting its 550 HP was considerable for its era, and brought attention to its racing pedigree. A number of users shared nostalgic memories tied to the vehicle, with @jcole reminiscing about it being his favorite car as a child, and @MapleSyrupCoffee associating it with fond memories from video games. There was also a broad consensus on its rarity and the admiration for its aesthetic appeal, with comments like @NickW1 calling it "The Holy Grail of Jags" and @CarCrazy24 commenting on its timeless beauty.
Neutral: Some comments provided neutral insights, discussing the car's historical significance and performance while raising questions about its design choices. For instance, @Viper1 mentioned that the XJ220 would have been a greater supercar with a V12 engine, opining that it still holds stunning qualities. @HeavyTank77 remarked that current Jaguar models lack the essence of the XJ220. Additionally, @TheOMDude expressed curiosity regarding the fuel tank's replacement history, indicating a desire for more maintenance knowledge. @Sahm inquired about service records, reflecting the interest in the vehicle's overall history while remaining uncertain about its current state. Overall, users acknowledged its place in automotive history and expressed general interest in its background.
Negative: On the negative side, some commenters expressed disappointment regarding the engine choice, feeling that the V6 was a misstep compared to the originally planned V12. @IanJ shared that he passed on buying the car due to its V6, while @Valiantjim voiced similar sentiments about associating the more powerful V12 with better performance despite the XJ220's remarkable speed. Commenters like @flatop noted a decline in Jaguar's reputation and quality over the years, lamenting that a once-great brand appears to be struggling. @HeyNk commented on feeling let down by Jaguar's current offerings, emphasizing a nostalgia for the beauty and artistry of the XJ220 compared to newer models.
|
 |
Positive: @StyleCars (The Seller) provided a detailed overview of the vehicle, highlighting its strengths such as the powerful dual-nature drivetrain that offers both quiet electric commuting and impressive Porsche performance. The car is highly optioned and features include 20" RS Spyder wheels, BOSE Surround Sound, sport seats, and a panoramic sunroof. The Cayenne's hybrid system is praised for its efficiency, allowing for EV-only driving around town and competitive charging capabilities. @Electra-glide shared a glowing review about their experience with Style Cars, emphasizing the smooth process, the detailed condition of the vehicle upon receipt, and outstanding customer service that included mailing a missing owner's manual. Other comments indicated satisfaction with the car's luxury features and hybrid efficiency.
Neutral: @georgepehanick raised a point regarding the quality of the tires, mentioning that better ones would enhance the Cayenne's performance. @aarodynamics inquired about the vehicle's HV battery history and minor damage noted in the Carfax report. @RWrw was assured that a smog check would be conducted for California buyers, clarifying the seller's comprehensive approach to compliance. The seller also addressed questions about the included charging equipment and potential options for extended warranties, showcasing transparency in their communication and proactivity in customer service. Various commenters showed interest in the vehicle's specifications and history, indicating a level of engagement with the purchase process.
Negative: Several comments reflect concerns regarding the vehicle's minor damage history as noted on the Carfax report. @aarodynamics requested more information about the specific damages and their resolution, anticipating clarity that would ensure the car's cosmetic condition. @ndnbill noted that the mobile charger and 25ft cable were not visible in the photos and sought confirmation about their inclusion in the sale, highlighting concerns about missing accessories that were initially expected. Additionally, user @SVXRide pointed out limitations regarding the electric charging capabilities, stressing the risks of insufficient charging infrastructure for potential buyers. Despite these concerns, the seller's responses offered reassurances about addressing issues and ensuring a positive buyer experience.
|
 |
Positive: @clafshwp (The Seller) highlights the rarity and immaculate condition of this 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Convertible, mentioning that it is among only 45 produced with specific color combinations. Enthusiasts like @stugottz and @67tbirdlover express fondness for the car, reminiscing about past ownership and the nostalgic value of Oldsmobiles. Comments from @junkollekteur and others underscore a connection to personal memories, showcasing the car's significance to fans of the brand and the rarity of the model in today’s market.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Misterelephant and @cpa713, engage in discussions about the car's features, such as the special alloy wheels, the engine's horsepower rating, and the color combination. @Bake82 inquires about undercarriage photos, indicating a keen interest in the car's overall condition, especially given its origins in Minnesota. @Jeffz and @RidleysRides inquire about specific features of the vehicle, showing curiosity about its performance and design elements.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding mileage and logistics, with @hairyolds mentioning the distance as a potential barrier to purchase. @Mezgrrrrr corrects @clafshwp on the engine specifications, indicating a discrepancy in power ratings that may affect potential buyers' perceptions. @Baker82’s request for detailed undercarriage pictures reflects a level of skepticism about the vehicle's condition, which stems from a desire for thorough transparency in a classic car sale.
|
 |
Positive: @UZJObsessed appreciates the factory restoration of the vehicle, noting that it retains its original specifications both inside and out, which adds to its authenticity. @Knuckle47 describes the truck as a beauty and a fun driver that garners attention on the road. @Marumari praises the vehicle's beautiful color, further endorsing its aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: @Olgsalc (The Seller) responds to various inquiries about the vehicle, confirming that it does not have heating or defrosters, but adds that a heating unit can be installed. @Roylee asks several questions regarding the truck's original color, the towing capacity, and whether there will be a driving video. @Allrz20 inquires about the ease of adding a heater inside the cabin, showcasing common buyer curiosity about features and performance.
Negative: There appears to be little outright negativity in the comments, though @PatESr's question about the heater might imply a concern regarding comfort during colder weather. Additionally, @Allrz20's query about the difficulty of adding a heater suggests some potential buyer hesitations regarding the vehicle's winter usability. However, the overall tone leans more towards enthusiasm and curiosity rather than criticism.
|
 |
Positive: Commenter @linderpat expresses admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a "gorgeous unmolested original GT500" and appreciates its significance as the first year of the retro Shelby. They also mentioned enjoying driving it, indicating a strong positive sentiment towards the driving experience. Furthermore, @71dodged100shortbed finds the opening bid of the car to be interesting, which suggests curiosity and potential eagerness in the auction process.
Neutral: Commenter @71dodged100shortbed acknowledges the opening bid without expressing strong feelings about it. Additionally, the seller (@71dodged100shortbed (The Seller)) maintains a neutral tone while providing information about the condition of the car, stating that it has under 9,000 miles and is exceptionally clean, giving potential buyers a factual overview without making exaggerated claims.
Negative: Commenter @linderpat notes a slight disappointment regarding the vehicle's paint color, wishing it had been available in Wimbledon white rather than bright white, which could indicate a personal aesthetic preference. However, there are no strongly negative comments about the vehicle; rather, the main criticisms are mild personal preferences rather than significant flaws.
|
 |
Positive: @getyourfreakon expressed admiration for the vehicle's stunning color, complimenting the seller on their choice, and wished them luck with the sale. @Ttcbj echoed this sentiment, praising the great color combination, specifically noting how the PTS gold pairs well with the black highlights. @Valkyrja commented on the owner’s appreciation for the car, acknowledging that they took care of it and highlighting some nice options included in the vehicle, affirming that the reason for selling is not due to dissatisfaction with the car. Additionally, @Ninetres labeled the color as 'hot,' indicating strong enthusiasm.
Neutral: @glof6b, the seller, noted that the vehicle is a rare 1 of 4 PTS Nordic Gold and that it may be one of the last examples since they are discontinuing the 718 platform. @bebopcola11 sought clarification on how @glof6b arrived at the number of four PTS in Nordic Gold, asking if such details are available from Porsche, showcasing an interest in the vehicle’s rarity without taking a strong stance on its desirability.
Negative: @Burmester raised concerns about the vehicle not having the upgraded headlights, roll cage, and six-point harnesses, implying dissatisfaction with the car's outfitting, particularly for US models. @Pressure_cooker clarified that roll cages are options for European vehicles but are not available in the US, suggesting that such features can only be added aftermarket. This indicates a degree of frustration with the limitations faced by US buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Longforlineup describes the Diablo as a 'Beautiful Bull' and an iconic car for its raw, analog, and pure design. Commentors like @M_G and @boaboyoz refer to it as a 'black beauty' and a 'gorgeous beast', appreciating its aesthetic and performance. @TJP_77 agrees with @Longforlineup that the original Diablo captures the essence of Lamborghini, highlighting RWD and the purity of its design. Enthusiasts like @Gatedv12 and @Reysdefender share nostalgic experiences, emphasizing the rewarding driving experience and the joy it brings.
Neutral: @DSFM2005 (The Seller) responds to inquiries about the car's condition, mentioning that while the automatic seat belt mechanisms have an issue causing fuses to pop, all lights and gauges are functional. Discussion surrounding the car's check engine light mentions it being a common issue among Diablos, with @Sledge4.2 and @JX30 providing detailed information on how to check for fault codes, illustrating the complexities of owning such a performance vehicle. The conversation also touches upon the unique skateboard wheel setup on the car, which was designed to protect the front spoiler, leading to mixed opinions about their practicality.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's issues, particularly about the non-functional seatbelts and the persistent check engine light as mentioned by @cardude76 and @Nicklaus. @QueenElizabeth3 questions the condition of the car due to possible rust and mentions that the title's branding could affect its value, while @Sledge4.2 highlights potential problems with the car's structure from the skateboard wheels. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of addressing these mechanical issues prior to sale to ensure buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @Porsche1931 absolutely loves the striking beauty of the vehicle, while @boaboyoz highlights it as a Stupendous specimen, praising its good looks and the legendary seller. @Roadrunner_CT describes the car as oozing class, and @Button admires the ordering choices made by its previous owner. Many others echo this sentiment, with comments like 'gorgeous' from @Espanolie and 'cool color!' from @cardude76, showcasing a consensus on the vehicle's aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Comments highlight the color and specifications of the vehicle, such as @zanary's clarification about the distinction between Ruby Star Neo and Ruby Star. @1600veloce (The Seller) provides details about their selling process and emphasizes their commitment to quality service and detailed listings. Meanwhile, @cwsteel discusses the car's increasing value over the years, indicating a blend of admiration and practical acknowledgment of the market.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism around the car's value, with @EMCobra questioning the worth of spending over half a million for what seems like a modern reinterpretation of a classic. @JM23 expresses frustration at the rising prices of new Porsches and critiques the automatic transmissions, hinting at a disconnect between nostalgia for traditional driving experiences and modern car culture. Lastly, @charlesheyl notes that color and taste are subjective, suggesting a mixed reception towards the vehicle's flashy appearance.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed nostalgia and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beautiful design and color scheme. @pcchuck reminisced about feeling like he was 7 again, referencing the charm of 1957 America. @Dollycat3 described the Buick Super Riviera as absolutely beautiful and one of her favorites, while @Miatadon shared fond memories of his family's identical Buick, which served them well during a cross-country trip. The vehicle's overall presence and aesthetic were celebrated, with @Longmire45 commenting on its quintessential '50s color palette and @billyblyth appreciating the stylish design of the four-door model, especially the absence of a B post which adds to its elegance.
Neutral: Several comments focused on technical details and the functional attributes of the vehicle rather than emotion. @1940century noted that the car's color is referred to as "Bittersweet" and provided insights on the paint's condition, indicating some bubbling and age-related imperfections. Additionally, multiple users asked about the functionality of various components, such as the heater and lights, to which @1940century confirmed that everything works well except for the clock, which stopped some years prior. There was also discussion on the drivetrain and performance characteristics of the Buick's Dynaflow transmission, with @63impalaboy offering a detailed overview of its mechanics and historical context.
Negative: On the downside, some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition. @BuffaloJim inquired about the extent of bubbling on the car and potential leaks from the underside, highlighting a need for clarity on the overall state of the vehicle. @1940century acknowledged the bubbling issue on the driver's side and mentioned minor oil leaks from the transmission. While the car generally received a positive reception, these concerns about wear and maintenance potential reflected a cautious view among some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @TjMigneault remarked on how beautiful the vehicle is, emphasizing it as a special car. @St96d045 also complimented the car, noting the appealing wheels. The seller, @O2cooled, provided reassuring details about the vehicle's condition, mentioning that it shifts smoothly, all interior electronics work perfectly, and the AC is functioning well. Furthermore, the car has been meticulously cared for, having been stored in a garage its entire life, which has helped maintain the integrity of the tires and overall condition.
Neutral: @O2cooled, the seller, answered several inquiries about the vehicle. They clarified that the timing chains have not been serviced yet but noted that they are recommended for servicing at 100K miles. The seller also provided specifics about the current tires, stating they have only 1,953 miles and come with a 30K warranty, while also mentioning that the car has had ceramic coating applied for added protection. Additionally, the seller addressed questions regarding potential smog checks, indicating a willingness to comply but also the limitation of timing with the upcoming auction.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle, including @Delfs-Haven asking if the seller plans to fix an oil leak from the valve cover gasket before the sale. @AriGold23 inquired about other issues related to the car, such as a wheel dent and overall functionality, showing apprehension about potential undisclosed problems. Furthermore, the seller expressed a personal regret about selling, stating that the car no longer suits their lifestyle, which adds a hint of emotional weight to the transaction, suggesting that it may not solely be based on mechanical reasons.
|
 |
Positive: @bobbyshipp describes the 2024 Defender S90 as a well-maintained local vehicle that shows no signs of wear or off-road use, having been garage kept by its previous owner, who is known for his meticulous care of cars. The seller highlights that this is a reliable vehicle with a warranty starting from November 2023, making it an attractive option for potential bidders. Additionally, @zddy expresses strong enthusiasm for the D90 model, revealing a personal connection due to ownership, which underscores the vehicle's appeal among fans.
Neutral: @sharkofthewood points out that with the upcoming transition to V8 engines for the D90 starting in 2026, the current 4-cylinder models are likely to become rarer and more desirable. @clm69 humorously questions the decision to switch to V8 engines, suggesting that the 4-cylinder engines are a better match for certain Defender models, while also mentioning satisfaction with their own Defender 110 paired with a 6-cylinder engine. @Orlandon echoes the disappointment with the V8-only future, showing a collective concern for the direction the Defender line is taking.
Negative: Although the initial comments are largely positive or neutral regarding the S90, there is clear disappointment expressed by @Orlandon and @sharkofthewood about the future models moving solely to V8 engines, indicating a potential shift away from the efficiency and appeal of the 4-cylinder options. @clm69 also shares skepticism about the choice of engine for the new Defenders, which hints at a divide among fans regarding the evolution of the Defender's engineering. Overall, the concern about the vehicle's direction amid the changes to its engine offerings casts a shadow over its current appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praise the Datsun 620 for its unique design and nostalgic value. @PDXBryan expresses admiration for the owner's dedication to maintaining the truck, and @craZee highlights the appealing patina on it. @Jerbo appreciates the thoughtful design elements that make the truck visually striking, emphasizing the craftsmanship and finishes that Datsun (Nissan) incorporated in the 70s. Many comments reflect an appreciation for the originality of the vehicle and its readiness for new ownership, with @SaltyMillennial (The Seller) confirming that it can be legally registered in California due to the included smog equipment.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the vehicle's specifications and features. @FrankRizzo points out that the truck is well-equipped with a 5-speed transmission and A/C, noting only the missing Deluxe interior option. @sampeterson raises a question about the likelihood of the truck having originally included a catalytic converter. @Mgrescueguy shares a personal anecdote about the enjoyment of driving a Datsun 620, while @DAT inquires about A/C estimates. @cyclemikey expresses confusion over the transmission swap and seeks clarity on the alterations made to the vehicle since its initial purchase.
Negative: Some comments reveal potential concerns about the vehicle's modifications and functionality. @cyclemikey questions whether the 4-speed knob and decal were added later, hinting at possible inconsistencies in the truck's history. @NachoDaddy007 asks about the operational status of the A/C and lights, questioning the overall reliability of the truck. There is ambiguity surrounding the transmission's original setup, as @cyclemikey critiques the nature of the modifications. Additionally, @sampeterson cleverly comments on the non-catalyst decal, indicating discrepancies with California emissions standards.
|
 |
Positive: @Fish0411 expresses excitement about the van being local in Nampa, indicating a potential personal connection. @Barryward finds the Econoline to be a fine vehicle, suggesting quality. @Amun_Ra nostalgically recalls having a similar van and intends to watch this one, while @robbiefarmer simply describes it as a sweet ride, reflecting overall enjoyment. @TNGuy appreciates the van's 302 engine and shows concern regarding construction details, indicating a level of enthusiasm for the vehicle's potential. @JayKay2430 admires the custom aspect of the van, reminiscing about typical 70s features, and @Chuckinnj humorously references a popular saying about rocking vans, which emphasizes the fun characteristics of the vehicle.
Neutral: Comments about the condition and specific details of the van vary among users. @moneybags asks about the clearance, highlighting a practical concern for driving conditions. @abarker requests videos of the van starting and driving, indicating interest but also curiosity about functionality. @MANOFVINTAGE inquires about the interior photos, demonstrating a desire for more details, while @Mikezehn (The Seller) addresses these inquiries by providing measured clearance figures and mentioning that the van retains a standard height.
Negative: On the negative side, @mcj4250 raises a concern regarding the potential presence of white powder in a corner by the fridge, which could imply neglect or maintenance issues. @Restomodford humorously questions the absence of iconic characters like Shaggy and Scooby-Doo, suggesting the need for themed decorations, which could indicate a lack of enthusiasm for the current aesthetic. Additionally, @Aubrey questions the condition of the paint and references a desire to transform the van into a themed vehicle, emphasizing dissatisfaction with its current appearance.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed that the vehicle is visually stunning and perfectly maintained. @hanigan noted the beauty of the car, while @wem5310 called it one of the best designs to come out of Munich, likening it to timeless art. The seller, @RareCollector21, confirmed that everything works as it should, including the A/C and heated seats, which adds to the car's appeal. Thanks to a replaced engine block and overall low mileage, the E34 has garnered admiration for its reliability and status as a '90s icon, with @carlos1987 highlighting its significance in BMW's golden era. Many appreciate its elegant design and the rarity of clean models like this one, echoing the sentiments of perfection in both maintenance and aesthetics.
Neutral: Commenters were curious about the vehicle's history and features, particularly regarding past ownership and maintenance. @Odink9 inquired about any potential smoke odors, receiving a response that the car currently smells fresh but might have had a previous owner who smoked. Questions about the vehicle's accident history were addressed by @RareCollector21, who clarified that any reported damage was minor and mainly cosmetic. A detailed discussion about the replaced engine block was initiated by @Jonfrancis, who questioned its history. The seller provided thorough details about the work done, including a new engine block installed in 2014, which reassured potential buyers about the vehicle's integrity.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's mechanical issues, particularly around the engine and electrical warnings. @BlueVirginia pointed out a low beam warning message and sought clarity on possible other warnings. @Jonfrancis and others discussed the infamous nikasil cylinder issue, which raised doubts about the engine’s past. Yet, @RareCollector21 mentioned that the block was replaced by BMW and confirmed that current engine compression shows no issues. The presence of such negative comments appears to stem mostly from cautious inquiries rather than outright condemnation of the vehicle, reflecting a desire for reassurance among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Rallyview shares a positive anecdote about a mechanically similar Lexus vehicle that has performed reliably over 420,000 miles, indicating that with some luck, this Lexus might last an impressive 300,000 more. @otcviper enthusiastically highlights the performance and luxury of Lexus hybrids, describing them as powerful yet comfortable, and praises Lexus for their exceptional customer service, having received a free hybrid battery replacement even after warranty expiration. @mongoose55 discusses the advantages of the NiMH battery technology used in this Lexus hybrid, noting it as environmentally friendly and cost-effective, further emphasizing Lexus' reputation for supporting their vehicles beyond warranty limits.
Neutral: @torelloamerican (The Seller) provides detailed responses to inquiries, confirming the maintenance history and answering questions about features such as car seat anchors and the vehicle's condition. Commenters like @miriboren and @Maddie1175 seek clarification on specific elements related to the vehicle's features and history, while @JRo92024 raises a question about the battery module's health, initiating a discussion on the expected lifespan of hybrid batteries in this model.
Negative: @jazzman66 raises concerns about cracks appearing in the car's interior, particularly on the dashboard, and notes a pattern of similar issues in older RX models, suggesting potential quality issues. @WiscMan65 draws attention to some concerning details in the vehicle's service history, including replaced warped rotors shortly after purchase and the hybrid transaxle assembly, which contribute to doubts about the vehicle's reliability despite being mostly dealer maintained. @rcummiskey and @JRo92024 discuss the fuel requirements of the car and the potential lifespan of its battery, casting further uncertainty on the ownership experience.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its impressive history and condition, with @L88Motorsports detailing a unique backstory involving a one-owner van purchased directly from a Chevrolet dealership. Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, with remarks from @spaceCrumb and @bondgraham praising its appearance and quality, even suggesting it deserves a place in a museum. @hairyolds appreciates the sanitary look of the van, noting how rare it is to find one in such good shape, contributing to a generally positive sentiment about its condition and history.
Neutral: Several comments seek additional information regarding the vehicle's operational features, including questions from @ecu741026 about the air conditioning and heating systems. @CadillacFlashback inquires about the functionality of the propane system and whether various house items work, indicating a desire for more detailed specifications. @Tick and @Bugs have also asked for images and measurements, representing the curiosity of potential buyers about practical aspects of the van.
Negative: A few concerns are raised by commenters regarding specific aspects of the vehicle. @deconstruction94 points out potential water or cleaner stains in the paint, asking if they are permanent, which could indicate worries about cosmetic damage. Additionally, there are inquiries about the condition of certain components, with comments from @ecu741026 mentioning the need for a fully operational air conditioning system and @CadillacFlashback asking whether the cooktop and other appliances are fully functional. These comments suggest a cautious approach among some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters admire the vehicle's specifications, with @fouroheight68 praising its sapphire blue color, while @matt256 describes it as basically perfect. Enthusiasts like @Chi_PT highlight its low mileage and rarity, noting it's one of the last naturally aspirated manual S models. @pulpo expresses enthusiasm for the car's specification, and @Myattre mentions that it reflects their ideal build from Porsche. Several comments note the car's excellent condition, like @aaron_comstock confirming no notable cosmetic issues and minimal wear, underscoring its desirability to collectors and enthusiasts.
Neutral: @aaron_comstock (The Seller) provides detailed information about the car, claiming to have known it since new, and emphasizing its impressive list of options. He answers questions regarding the paint protection film and provides context into the car's maintenance history. Commenters like @rda1987 inquire about possible trades, and some, such as @ChrisCOak, discuss their experiences with similar models, adding a layer of community engagement. Overall, the conversation revolves around the car's condition and desired specifications.
Negative: Some comments express concern about minor issues, such as @rda1987 asking about potential cosmetic issues and @RegaJohn requesting confirmation on tire manufacturing dates. Although @cryptical1200 mentions delamination on the door cards, asserting that it shouldn't be a deal breaker, such concerns indicate that potential buyers are critically assessing this car. Additionally, @Mean-Car raises a question regarding scrapes on the front lip, showing that while the car is highly regarded, there's some attention to its condition that needs addressing.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's excellent condition and attractive appearance, with @Dollycat3 calling it a beautiful 420, and @CarCrazy24 praising the stunning color combination. @TTG expressed joy in seeing the car saved from a junkyard, indicating a positive perception of its restoration. The seller, @Styop554, reassured interested buyers that the car underwent an independent inspection through Lemon Squad which confirmed the quality of the vehicle, including the original condition of most panels. Additionally, new tires have been installed, making the vehicle more appealing to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters requested clarification on the vehicle's history and current status. @no.radar questioned the total loss designation for the car, and @Sowards20 sought information on any service history. @Nld1966 asked about proof of repairs necessary for titling the car. In response, the seller, @Styop554, provided thorough information regarding the vehicle’s repairs and inspections, indicating that it has passed California smog and safety inspections and that all required paperwork is available for interested buyers. Some commenters also appeared curious about details such as tire age and mileage, with @myboynacho asking about tire condition and @WadeW mentioning uneven tire wear.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, some skepticism surrounds the car's salvage title. @dirtyrat expressed disbelief regarding the vehicle being totaled for what they considered minor damage and criticized the insurance process as unfair. Additionally, @drtino pointed out discrepancies in the hood's appearance in various photos, suggesting that it might not have been properly closed, raising concerns about the overall condition. Comments like these indicate that while there is significant interest and appreciation for the vehicle, potential buyers remain cautious about its past and current status.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the Z4 M Coupe, highlighting aspects such as the carbon leather trim, the absence of navigation as a preferred option, and the overall condition of the vehicle. @Carguy312 remarked on their love for all M Coupes, while @E86_nerd shared their appreciation for what they consider the perfect interior combination. Multiple users agreed on the desirability of the extended leather option noted in the auction listing, with @seacoasthouseofcars (The Seller) reinforcing that this car is a standout example and describing it as a collector-grade vehicle. The seller also emphasized the careful maintenance and outstanding condition of the car, which is appealing to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments provided additional details about the vehicle and inquiries about specific aspects, particularly regarding the wheels. @Cds4850 and @TheHunter discussed the type of wheels fitted on the car, with @seacoasthouseofcars (The Seller) confirming they are Apex EC-7s. Additional comments from @kgy and @penfold230 requested clarifications on the vehicle's condition and offered insights about the possibility of a pre-purchase inspection. Many users appreciated the provision of detailed service receipts and photos while suggesting that more comprehensive media could help gauge the car's condition further.
Negative: There were some concerns raised regarding the car's repair history and the frequency of maintenance, specifically related to the head gasket and other potential issues brought up by @penfold230 and @RustyTruck. @E86_nerd noted various oddball electrical issues reported in past service entries that could raise alarms among potential bidders. @penfold230 voiced worries about whether ongoing problems, such as a malfunctioning headlight, had been properly addressed, while the need for more videos to assess the car's current state and reliability was felt by many, suggesting that buyers are seeking reassurances before committing to a purchase.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its impressive design and historical significance. @lschuc described the Avanti as a 'really nice' example that has been well preserved and even featured in the October 2020 Avanti wall calendar. @LMGun echoed similar sentiments, praising the car's striking design and excellent restoration, reflecting on how the 1963 Avanti was pivotal in automotive history. @Donaldashton expressed nostalgia, stating how cool the cars are and that this model would make a great addition to anyone's collection, while @Oakhurst emphasized the car's timelessness and lasting impact.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarifications on specific details about the vehicle's condition, particularly related to repairs needed on the passenger seat and the hand brake. For instance, @Skegeevette and @RobGUE both requested information about the seat back damage and the functioning of the hand brake. @RogerYouders (The Seller) provided background on the car's history, mentioning that it was first sold in July of 1963, and commented positively on its performance and mileage, confirming the vehicle's suitability for longer drives.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, there were criticisms regarding the car's modifications. @TheCritic suggested that the wheels and tires needed to be changed for authenticity, while others expressed concern about safety, with @rxk9394 recommending a brake system upgrade for better safety. Additionally, @rocksteady noted the lack of photographic evidence to support the vehicle's condition, which could be a deterrent for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments indicate an overall admiration for the vehicle, with several commendations on its condition and history. @RoundHeadlights describes it as a "nice looking low-mile series 1 RX-7," and @LooseNut appreciates the car's cleanliness. @Ycbmsma notes that it is in great condition and predicts an increase in value over time. @GtiKyle emphasizes the assurance of quality given the photo documentation, and @garagekeptmotors (The Seller) proudly states that it is the cleanest they have seen, with all original documentation and one owner. Furthermore, several commenters mention the car's appealing color combinations and the joy they find in owning similar models, signifying a strong connection to this vehicle brand.
Neutral: There are several inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifications and condition, as potential buyers seek more information on its performance and features. @Sce8198 and @DJCSr ask about known issues and the results of a compression test, indicating a desire for transparency about the car's functionality. @Cloh raises questions about the back hatch glass and possible moisture on the transaxle, illustrating that interested parties are scrutinizing the details carefully. @garagekeptmotors (The Seller) affirms the vehicle's lack of issues and confirms operational features, which helps maintain confidence among potential buyers without being overly ornate.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about specific features of the vehicle. @Ruiz73 questions the originality of the seats, which prompts a relatively defensive response from @garagekeptmotors (The Seller) countering that they are original. This creates potential friction as @Ruiz73 feels the need to clarify their intentions, suggesting doubts about the vehicle's authenticity. Additionally, @Cloh's observation about the back hatch needing support brings into question other possible maintenance issues, which may influence potential buyers' confidence. Overall, while the majority of comments are positive or neutral, a few indicate skepticism as some aspects remain under scrutiny.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 described the vehicle as "absolutely beautiful" which indicates a high level of satisfaction regarding its aesthetics and overall appearance.
Neutral: Several questions were raised by users regarding the functionality and condition of the vehicle. @Demoner1 inquired about the presence of an air conditioning unit given the visible controls on the dashboard; the seller, @Davis_944, confirmed that there is no air conditioning, only heating. @oughtoh expressed concern about whether the car can be driven in its current state, specifically inquiring about the oil and transmission fluid leaks, as well as the extent of rust present on the car.
Negative: @oughtoh's comments highlight potential issues with the vehicle, questioning if the oil leaks need immediate attention and the degree of rust damage, which indicates a lack of confidence in the car's condition for driving without repairs.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered enthusiastic praise from multiple commenters. @Europaisch describes it as a "Beautiful sleeper," while @RedRon commends a "fantastic driving video." @Barryward expresses an emotional connection, stating he would be "in heaven driving this 911." Continued accolades come from @HelpMeHelpU, highlighting the special color, and @Bruce911, who notes its beauty and character. Prospective buyers have found @ennisk1 (The Seller) to be a trustworthy and responsive seller, and many have expressed admiration for the car's rarity and specifications. @Rennline appreciates the car's spec, emphasizing the absence of the Sport Chrono gauge, which enhances the vehicle's aesthetic.
Neutral: Numerous comments focus on the condition of the vehicle and details about its auction. @ennisk1 (The Seller) provided thorough responses to inquiries about the car's condition, confirming there are no major imperfections apart from a small rock chip on the hood, which has been touched up. The seller offered to provide additional pictures upon request, maintaining an open line of communication throughout the auction process. Commenters, including @Chi_PT and @getto822000, sought clarification about potential imperfections and the absence of paint protection film (PPF), showcasing the ongoing interest in the car's history and condition, especially given its rarity.
Negative: Some comments indicate concerns about the lack of PPF and the car's condition. @Porsche_turblow questions why the car has never had PPF, while @OttoBozart expresses confusion over the video's location, suggesting a disconnect in expectations. Additionally, @jimoby inquires about the possibility of Porsche CPO certification, revealing potential uncertainty about the car's status post-purchase. Despite these inquiries, most comments lean positively towards the car's appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @goated86 (The Seller) expresses a strong affection for the vehicle, stating, "I love it to death" and highlighting that his family enjoys it too. Other commenters, such as @JakeTheSnake115 and @SeanG777, share their excitement and enthusiasm for the vehicle, with expressions like "So cool!" and "Awesome ride." @DonziDon appreciates the aesthetic of the jeep, noting it looks great despite previous concerns about the underpowered engine, which he sees as an easy fix. Additionally, @DrJacquesStrappe comments on the vehicle's uniqueness compared to more common restorations, accentuating its appeal.
Neutral: Some commenters, like @Mr.Majestyk, seek further clarification on specific vehicle issues, such as the functionality of the wipers and the push-button radio. @1936fred inquires about the compatibility of a stock hardtop, to which @goated86 (The Seller) confirms that the hardtop fits well and is included with the sale. @DonziDon expresses curiosity about the reason for the quick sale, pondering the seller's motivations. Overall, these neutral comments revolve around logistical details and queries rather than emotional reactions.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's performance are mentioned, particularly by @DonziDon, who finds the engine underpowered. Although he views this as a fixable issue, it still highlights a potential drawback to the vehicle. Additionally, @Mr.Majestyk mentions the "wipers do not work" and questions the radio functionality, indicating that there are still some mechanical uncertainties. Ultimately, there’s a curiosity surrounding the quick sale of the vehicle, suggesting some buyers might interpret it as a lack of commitment from the seller.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have enthusiastically praised the 1966 Cadillac Eldorado, noting its eye-catching modifications and overall appeal. @DHD505 described it as a 'sweet ride' and expressed excitement to see more pictures, especially with the top up. @OWLBYRD and @goldenbear53 appreciated the aesthetics of the vehicle, particularly the Dayton wheels, considering them a perfect match for a lowrider. Various users, including @Lebrani6 and @boaboyoz, marveled at the car's exceptional condition and tasteful upgrades, reinforcing the idea that this Eldorado is a well-executed blend of classic charm and modern enhancements.
Neutral: From the comments, several users inquired about the car's specifications and functionality. @DEA23 asked about the original color and the wheels included in the sale. The seller, @simpleandrich, confirmed that the original color was Cobalt firemist, and original wheels are available for those interested. Other questions revolved around the car's maintenance, such as climate control and air suspension functionality, indicating a general interest in knowing more about the vehicle's practicality and care requirements. The seller addressed many queries, assuring potential buyers about the car's working conditions and the presence of non-original parts.
Negative: Some comments reflected criticism and skepticism regarding the modifications made to the Cadillac. @Spartanman expressed concerns that the car's modifications would diminish its value, likening it to altering a masterpiece. @misterautomobile supported this sentiment, arguing against tastefully upgrading what he considers a classic piece of art. Additionally, @TheCritic candidly mentioned that restoring the car to its stock condition might be costly and labor-intensive. Such comments suggest a divide among viewers, with some appreciating the modern updates while others remained steadfast traditionalists.
|
 |
Positive: @Olds84 mentioned their fondness for the body style of the '73 Cutlass Supreme, indicating it's a vehicle worth watching. @boaboyoz expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, calling it a delightful example, while @sfever appreciated the correct badging as a Cutlass with a 425 engine. @millenniumauto (The Seller) reinforced the car's strong performance, noting it runs and drives very well, and assured bidders that extra trims and accessories come with the purchase.
Neutral: Many commenters have inquired about various aspects of the vehicle, such as @DonH-NH's request for a video of the car and safety or mechanical issues that may affect state inspection. @Oldwizard32 and @Hurstolds1442 both sought information about the vehicle's powertrain and driving video respectively. @Startracks3477 raised questions regarding the brakes, to which @texxas provided a visual clue based on the photos, indicating the presence of drum brakes when enlarged.
Negative: There were concerns raised about the vehicle's condition, notably from @Sue2024, who pointed out rust on the tail lights and asked about any necessary body work. @steelergimp reiterated the inquiry about whether the air conditioning blows cold, highlighting unresolved questions. @texxas commented on the lack of wheel well trim, suggesting that the incomplete side molding at the rear wheel openings impacts the car's appearance.
|
 |
Positive: @HG52 shared their enthusiasm for the vehicle, appreciating its unique presence as a wagon and expressing that it is a joy to drive and aesthetically pleasing. They particularly noted the full paint finish, complimenting it as looking significantly better than alternatives. @bobnokley reinforced this positivity, stating the 2.0-liter EA888 engine with the 8-speed transmission is a reliable platform based on their own positive experience with a similar model, which has seen over 200k miles without failures.
Neutral: @PuristMiami (The Seller) engaged with inquiries from potential buyers, indicating openness to answering questions and facilitating viewings throughout the week. There were also queries from @Atvrider regarding the availability of keys and accessories, to which @PuristMiami confirmed the inclusion of one key, floor mats, and manuals but clarified that only a plastic spare blade was present. @Chief_Engr raised a question about the presence of Apple Car-Play, which was not directly answered in the comments but reflects common concerns among prospective buyers about modern connectivity features.
Negative: @TimsVice expressed concerns regarding the longevity of the turbo 4-cylinder engine and drivetrain, querying the general consensus on their reliability. @AlanA-320 sought information about the vehicle's Carfax history, particularly any mention of minor damage, which @PuristMiami acknowledged but stated that their findings suggested it was very minor without accompanying photos. This concern indicates a level of scrutiny from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's past condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Hoglover praised the vehicle's frame-up restoration and commended the clean undercarriage, expressing a desire for more detailed photos to confirm the quality. @Biglinda also appreciated the car's beauty, inquiring about its color and a potential driving video, and expressed gratitude for @dschwar1's accommodating responses. @dschwar1’s willingness to provide additional details and videos shows a proactive engagement with potential buyers, enhancing the overall impression of the selling process.
Neutral: There were discussions about the engine's authenticity, with @Hjabsheh1973 asking if the engine numbers match the car. Both @Bordeaux and @dschwar1 clarified that the original engine is present and provided supporting details regarding the engine specifications. @radpres555 shared insights regarding VIN numbers, indicating a varied history of engine identification among models, while @gravelgrinder noted that specific VIN stamping practices started later in production.
Negative: Some comments included concerns about engine matching and its implications on pricing. @58Charcoal jokingly remarked about the original engine adding significant value, while others raised questions regarding the consistency in VIN stamping practices for different model years, hinting at possible discrepancies. Overall, while most comments were constructive, there remains a cautionary tone about ensuring the vehicle's documentation is thorough and accurate.
|
 |
Positive: @Tombo62 highlights the unique characteristics of the vehicle, noting it is number 171 of 171 and was the first produced car used for Hertz's 50th Anniversary marketing campaign. He appreciates the performance enhancements from the Shelby modifications, describing them as impactful. @AZGT350 shares his pride in owning car #77 and remarks on the car's beauty, emphasizing its status as a significant piece of Mustang history. The overall sentiment in these comments expresses admiration for the vehicle's legacy and its potential for appreciation in value.
Neutral: There’s a discussion surrounding the production figures of the car, with @Tombo62 and @AZGT350 contributing to clarify that while 171 cars were produced, only 140 were rentals, sparking an engaging conversation about the car's rarity. @gm1854 inquires about the vehicle’s location and its recall status, which leads to @GrahamRahalPerformance (The Seller) confirming that the recalls have not yet been addressed because the vehicle has low mileage. @GrahamRahalPerformance (The Seller) provides location details for anyone interested in an inspection and encourages potential bidders to reach out for questions.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's safety are raised by @gm1854, who asks if factory recalls have been resolved, specifically citing a recall about luggage compartment wiring and rear view camera issues. @GrahamRahalPerformance (The Seller) acknowledges that the recalls are still outstanding due to the vehicle's limited use, indicating potential legal or safety matters that need attention. This could deter some potential buyers who prioritize safety and completed recalls when considering a purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @Barryward expresses confidence in the reliability of this Karmann Ghia, while @Maddie1175 describes it as a work of art, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @Braukuche compliments the car's overall appearance, noting the high-quality black and red/silver interior, and appreciates the solid condition of the luggage tray and original pans, which are significant in the restoration process. @Zed33 (The Seller) shares fond memories associated with the car, detailing the care and attention his father put into restoring it, using original components, and overall, the excellent exterior and interior conditions of the vehicle are lauded.
Neutral: The discussions among various commentors bring up some neutral points about specific features of the Karmann Ghia. @Braukuche identifies that the car is actually a later 1600 model rather than a 1200, while simultaneously acknowledging the minor authenticity issues present. @Erooni and @A53 inquire about specific mechanical aspects such as the working condition of lights and speedometer, showing interest in practical functionality. The condition of the convertible top and its mechanism is brought up by @tri356, revealing common concerns and hopes for maintenance without overly negative implications.
Negative: There are a few concerns raised regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @JAL78 questions the state of the clutch cable Bowden tube based on a photo and asks if the floor pans have been replaced, which suggests a need for clarification on restoration details. @Frogman70 notes potential leaks in the shocks and questions the age of the tires, indicating there may be maintenance issues requiring attention. Additionally, @TheGhiaGirl points out a possible issue with the convertible top not folding down correctly, which, if not addressed, could lead to further concerns for the potential buyer.
|
 |
Positive: Comments reflected a sense of uniqueness and excitement towards this modified FJ Cruiser, with @AJKidd calling it "very unique" and "extremely tempting". @Croatoanian expressed optimism, saying that it could be perfect for the right person and wished the auction well. Additionally, @gdspc voiced a desire for Toyota to have offered a convertible version from the factory, suggesting that the idea is appealing even to those who appreciate the original model.
Neutral: Several users had practical inquiries regarding the vehicle, including @delz05, who asked about the convertible top's operation and weather resistance. @shadylane inquired about the convertible top's security features and whether it could be modified to a manual transmission. Meanwhile, @Wcleary (The Seller) provided clarifications about the power top and stated that there were no modifications made to the lights and grills, indicating a commitment to transparency in the vehicle's specifications.
Negative: Conversely, some comments raised concerns about ownership and quality. @mairagiraldo highlighted potential ownership issues with the title, suggesting that someone else might still hold rights to the vehicle. @Sethb expressed concerns over the vehicle's undercarriage and rust appearance, questioning its condition. Additionally, @manu_laffon criticized the conversion, comparing it to other models in a somewhat sarcastic manner, indicating skepticism regarding the vehicle's modifications.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciate the beauty and performance of the vehicle, highlighting its impressive features. @Barryward notes that someone could score with the M4, while @MartyM3ts describes it as a hardcore M4. @Cloh also expresses admiration by calling it beautiful. Additionally, @CVAUTO (The Seller) emphasizes positive aspects such as the original paddle shifters upgraded with carbon fiber, enhancing the driving experience. Overall, the sentiment towards the car's aesthetics and performance is quite favorable.
Neutral: Several comments seek clarification and additional information rather than expressing strong opinions. @Yeezers raises questions about the front tires and whether they will be replaced after the auction. @Cloh requests more details about the driver's seat bolster and possible warning notices observed in pictures, along with inquiries about video uploads for a cold start and drive. @CVAUTO (The Seller) responds to many of these queries, agreeing to provide more images and detailing the current status of the vehicle, including the confirmation of two keys available.
Negative: There are several concerns raised by commenters regarding the vehicle's condition. @Yeezers points out that the front splitter appears broken and asks if there is a replacement available. @BMWconnoisseur highlights the absence of the carbon fiber front lip and requests photos of the bumper's condition. @zapp questions whether the car has been tracked and if the brakes have been serviced, suggesting possible maintenance issues. @CVAUTO (The Seller) acknowledges these concerns and pledges to provide more detailed photos and information to address them.
|
 |
Positive: @Segura911 noted that the vehicle looks like a nice project and wished the seller good luck with the auction. @MaikoR, the owner, responded positively about the car's features, mentioning a full engine overhaul and a performance upgrade with a Steve Wong chip. He emphasized that it is a matching numbers car with a distinctive interior, stating that it runs and drives great, making it a nice driver for its age.
Neutral: Comments from @Nine11 and @90sundevil raised important questions regarding the authenticity of the photos and expressed interest in learning more about the car's history. @mcqueens (The Seller) acknowledged that some photos were incorrectly posted but assured the community that the correct images would be uploaded soon. @MaikoR confirmed these details and addressed various inquiries regarding maintenance history, including oil changes and the car's previous ownership by a conscientious individual who took good care of it.
Negative: There were concerns raised about the photos not belonging to the vehicle as indicated by @Nine11, who questioned the authenticity of the images, which was confirmed by @mcqueens (The Seller) and @MaikoR. Furthermore, @spec_hunter and @BorninStuttgart inquired about smog regulations and the original stereo, which left some uncertainty about compliance with California regulations. @ncipps specifically sought receipts for the claimed engine rebuild, reflecting skepticism regarding the vehicle's maintenance claims and overall history.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous commenters have praised the 1966 Ford Mustang Convertible 289, highlighting its stunning aesthetics and exceptional quality. @Segura911 referred to it as a 'black beauty', while @BossPapa described it as a 'must have' for any Ford enthusiast, complimenting the money invested and detailing. @Jtsbrs expressed admiration for the meticulous restoration process, asking about the judging sheets, further emphasizing the car's show-quality status. @Scottcautos noted the car's stunning appearance in person and stated it's an extraordinary example of a Mustang. Additionally, @bdavidk62 and @goldengup both reiterated its attractiveness, calling it a 'top shelf vehicle' and 'loaded with options' respectively.
Neutral: The seller, MSCLASSICCARSLLC, provided detailed information about the vehicle's history and specifications, ensuring potential buyers were well informed. They detailed its restoration history, previous ownership by Peter Vander Veen, and the lack of judging sheets for an award it had received. Commenters such as @Jtsbrs questioned the availability of documentation about the car's scoring during competitions, to which the seller responded that they have the award but no accompanying sheets. Furthermore, MSCLASSICCARSLLC mentioned their high sell-through rate on Bring-A-Trailer, indicating confidence in the car's appeal in the auction space, while inviting scrutiny and further inquiries from potential buyers.
Negative: On a more cautious note, some comments raised questions regarding the car's options and restoration details. @eldonchas pointed out that certain features like the air conditioning were likely dealer-installed rather than factory-direct, as well as the nuances around the car's dual exhaust system. @CaddyM3 expressed confusion about a previous auction where the vehicle sold for $50k but the deal fell through, questioning the circumstances of the initial sale. While opinions varied, these criticisms reflect a degree of skepticism among potential buyers, suggesting a need for clarity and assurance regarding authenticity and restoration specifics.
|
 |
Positive: @juanj720 (The Seller) expresses satisfaction with the car's performance, emphasizing that after rebuilding the high pressure fuel pumps, the vehicle runs smoothly and reliably. The seller indicates that this repair is significant for a car of this age, providing assurance to potential buyers regarding a common issue in older models. The overall sentiment towards the car's condition is optimistic, reflecting a positive ownership experience and highlighting its quality despite its age.
Neutral: Comments from @Jonfrancis and @m2-bimmer seek clarification on material aspects of the car, such as the functioning of the seat controls and the engine's oil consumption. @juanj720 (The Seller) responds with details about the malfunctioning electric thigh support and the limited effectiveness of the massage function. The seller also notes the absence of auxiliary audio features in the 2006 model while confirming that the engine has no oil or coolant leaks, providing factual insights without strong emotional undertones.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the functionality of certain features in the vehicle, particularly with the electric seat controls and audio system capabilities. @Jonfrancis questions the reliability of the V12 engine over time, which could hint at apprehension about long-term issues. While @juanj720 (The Seller) addresses these questions candidly, the inquiries underline potential worries about the car's age and the challenges that come with owning an older luxury vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Dunner53 appreciates the FJ40 as a respectable survivor, noting its restored and upgraded motor while pointing out that it can be driven home without major issues. @mfontaine2008 expresses excitement about the vehicle, calling it 'badass'. This enthusiasm reflects overall positive sentiments about the FJ40's functionality and aesthetics. Additionally, @MangioneMotors confirms that the vehicle has new air conditioning and power steering, enhancing its appeal as a practical option for buyers.
Neutral: @Horses14 and @DTRANE22 inquire about features such as power steering and any potential rubbing issues with the tires during full articulation, indicating an interest in the vehicle's functionality without strong opinions. @ROWI poses specific queries regarding the rust situation and the car's ability to drive from California to Idaho, reflecting a cautious but interested perspective. Various commenters also request further information and videos for a clearer picture of the FJ40's condition, showing a mix of intrigue and a desire for validation before making decisions.
Negative: @GooniesAz raises concerns about the gas tank's condition and whether it has been moved outside, hinting at potential oversight or lack of information on critical vehicle components. @rustyray asks about documentation regarding the refurbishment and specific details about engine specifications and rust areas, reflecting possible skepticism about the vehicle's maintenance history. Their comments suggest a wariness that could affect the perceived reliability of the vehicle among potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @BillS007 (The Seller) expresses confidence in the vehicle's quality, highlighting that it looks, drives, and smells like new. He assures that the car has been well-maintained and previously owned by a car collector. He mentions its impressive acceleration and performance, stating that any buyer will be very happy with their purchase. Additionally, he notes the comfort for long drives, suggesting that he would be comfortable driving it anywhere across the United States.
Neutral: Several potential buyers, including @cnj1933 and @Eclark, ask for more details about the car's condition and service history, reflecting a typical due diligence process for interested buyers. @Eclark inquires about the tires and oil change history while @cnj1933 seeks a driving video and questions the car's prior lack of service. @BillS007 addresses these inquiries by confirming the tires are in good condition, explaining the limited usage and storage of the vehicle in temperature-controlled garages, and clarifying that there was an error regarding the oil change records.
Negative: @gnorkus raises concerns regarding potential engine and transmission issues commonly associated with the vehicle's model, which might lead some buyers to apprehension. @BillS007 reassures him that there are no such issues with this vehicle and shares anecdotal evidence about a similar car still performing well after many miles, but the initial concern reflects a common apprehension regarding reliability in the car's market segment.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting the stunning visuals of the Miami Blue color and the overall build quality. @Versangetryx praised the pictures and presentation, while @69_911e referred to it as a "stunning build!" The enthusiasm continued with @Rustnglow noting it as the best color combination for a Porsche RS they had ever seen, and @GDogg mentioning it being a fantastic color that would draw numerous compliments. Several others, including @dreamspec and @whipcity76, echoed similar sentiments about its beauty and performance, suggesting it would be a standout at car meets and a revered collector's item.
Neutral: A few comments provided informative insights rather than outright praise or criticism. @BlackVapor questioned whether the Miami Blue was a Paint to Sample (PTS) color, while @dos3 clarified the discrepancy between magnesium center lock wheels and the alloy GT3 wheels on the car, suggesting there might have been variations in shipments. @praeco also shared that Miami Blue was among the select optional colors rather than a PTS option, adding context to the car's rarity with some numbers about production. This exchange of technical details indicated a healthy curiosity about the vehicle's specifications and history.
Negative: On a less positive note, some comments indicated skepticism about the car's pricing and its situation. @PaulEZ remarked on the low mileage potentially restricting the car's use, hinting at a common issue with such high-value vehicles becoming 'garage queens.' @2006m5 posed a question regarding the factors driving the high price, suggesting concerns about whether it was merely due to mileage and color. @csmarkham further pointed out the interplay of bidding dynamics, hinting at concerns about the value as influenced by the market's expectations of future models. These comments reflected a more cautious outlook on the investment potential of the car.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, praising it for its stunning visuals and unique color combination of pearl red and cream. @Milotic described it as 'gorgeous' and @oldhockyplayr referred to the color as 'spectacular.' @SupraFreak stated that the pearl red color looks amazing on this model, emphasizing the car's timeless appeal and beautiful engine sound. Users like @boaboyoz and @vtec4ever declared it to be one of the coolest cars and exemplified automotive royalty, respectively. A sense of nostalgia and excitement was prevalent, with comments like @pdxbryan recalling the thrill of seeing such an impressive machine.
Neutral: Commenters provided a mix of technical insights and personal experiences regarding the vehicle's performance, maintenance, and ownership history. @PhilO raised a question about the gearbox description in the auction listing, indicating a desire for clarity on the vehicle's specifications. The ongoing communication between the seller and potential buyers, as highlighted by @Simplythebest, illustrated a transparent and engaging selling process, with the seller providing detailed information about past service history and maintenance. Varying levels of interest and enthusiasm from users, such as @Flyautoworks asking about detailed images of paint condition, reflected their meticulous consideration as they examined the car.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's maintenance and past services, particularly regarding the fact that some services were performed at non-Lexus dealerships. User @BurnerID expressed apprehension over the quality of these services and requested proof of adherence to manufacturer-recommended protocols. Others, like @hellrot99m3, pointed out potential wear on the car, such as scratches and the need for detailed inspection before bidding. These comments indicated a cautionary approach among potential buyers, with a clear desire for reassurance about the car's overall condition and the integrity of its maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: @Johnny1eye expressed appreciation for the truck's design, particularly enjoying the cap on the bed. Meanwhile, @Wheels4life remarked on the beauty of the truck while also pondering its fuel efficiency, which was addressed by @Dc8fixer who highlighted the durability of the truck’s 4L80E transmission. @Jbrown89 complimented the American Racing wheels and noted the attractiveness of both the cap and the fender flares. There was also a celebration of the truck's dependability and simple maintenance, especially considering older models like the 95 K2500 shared by @JayKay2430.
Neutral: Comments from @tifjeslil (The Seller) provided factual answers about the truck’s fuel ratings, suggesting the 7.4L engine typically achieves 8 to 12 mpg. The seller shared information about the truck's gear ratio, confirming it has 4:10 gears and detailed the operational hints of various switches for fog lights. Questions from @JBMO and @DStone4320 focused on specific features like fog lights, service history, and condition details, indicating a clear interest in the truck’s functionality and maintenance rather than its visual appeal.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the overall condition of the vehicle, including potential interior odors, engine noises, and transmission issues, which were notably highlighted in inquiries from @dapap. @WIZZZZ questioned the service history and whether any significant maintenance had been performed beyond recent fluid changes. Both commentors displayed a cautious attitude, raising issues that might detract from the truck’s appeal despite the positivity expressed by others.
|
17×9″ Panasport G7 C5C Forged Wheels for Nissan Skyline
Panasport G7 C5C Forged Wheels
Lot 208708
Private Party
 |
Positive: The vehicle's wheels, specifically the Panasport G7 C5C, are highlighted as super rare and highly desirable for Nissan Skyline R32 GT-R cars. @frenchfelgen notes the extensive refurbishment process, which included repainted centers and barrels, polished lips, and replated genuine hardware, indicating a commitment to maintaining quality and authenticity. Furthermore, @frenchfelgen emphasizes that these wheels were the preferred upgrade during the R32 GT-R's launch, showcasing their historical and collectible significance.
Neutral: @frenchfelgen provides details about the shipping costs to the US or Canada, noting the price of 890 USD for expedited service. He mentions that the refurbishment of the wheels cost a substantial 1587 USD, which underscores the value and care invested in restoring them. There is also a mention that the original stock wheels were 16 inches while the upgraded Panasport wheels are 17 inches, appealing to those looking for performance enhancement while maintaining a similar weight.
Negative: While @frenchfelgen mentions the wheels' current availability and cult status among collectors in Japan, there is an implied concern about their scarcity, as these wheels are no longer produced. The high cost of the refurbishment and shipping may deter potential buyers who are not willing to invest heavily in wheels that may have limited availability. Moreover, the historical significance may not resonate with all car enthusiasts, potentially limiting the appeal to a niche market.
|
 |
Positive: @CarDogThreePedals highlighted the impressive power-to-weight ratio of the vehicle, indicating it could offer an exhilarating driving experience. @bforbesut pointed out the presence of Miata seats, which showcases a thoughtful design choice in an exciting build. @caffine commented on the fun associated with the engine swap, suggesting that it likely has significantly more horsepower than the original 1.9L engine, contributing to an enjoyable driving adventure. Additionally, @LongDucDong praised the swap as great, further affirming the kit's appeal.
Neutral: @Miata91 seemed to have mixed feelings about the car, stating it looked fun, but questioned if the weight was being accurately represented. Several commenters, including @RidleysRides and @suresure, were focused on the construction details, with @RidleysRides noticing aspects like the under-dash wiring and @suresure inquiring about the sourcing of the engine and transmission. The seller, @Unlucky831, provided clarity about the engine's origin from a 2004 Nissan 350Z, responding to questions raised about the build.
Negative: Some concerns were expressed about the vehicle's functional components. @caffine mentioned the disappointment regarding the non-operational flippy lights, which they considered a fun feature that could enhance the vehicle's charm. Additionally, @jaystr6 raised inquiries about the engine's support and structural modifications made, pointing out possible issues with the cross member. @r32fan further asked if there were any leaks, reflecting apprehension about potential reliability issues that prospective buyers might want answered.
|
 |
Positive: @VolterM expressed admiration for the truck, noting that it reached 65 mph in a video, and inquired whether it could go past 70 mph. @Steveecho (The Seller) responded positively, confirming that the truck can run comfortably between 55-70 mph due to its 4-speed transmission, and clarified the speed discrepancy in the video. He also offered to send a better video if needed, emphasizing the truck's great performance.
Neutral: @Ryannyer asked about the VIN on the SC Title, wondering if it was a full number or just the 6 digits. @Steveecho (The Seller) clarified that it is a 6-digit VIN and mentioned that he had no issues registering the truck, indicating a smooth experience with the documentation.
Negative: @jalexka cautioned that sellers should consider that upgrades on used vehicles might not guarantee a return on investment. @savagebilt criticized @Steveecho's statements regarding the truck's value and build time, labeling them as exaggerated and humorous based on his seven years of experience in overhauling and selling similar vehicles. @savagebilt questioned the features that justify such a high valuation for the truck and mentioned that they could build a similar truck in just two weeks.
|
 |
Positive: @CRM925 kicks off the conversation with enthusiasm, suggesting that the vehicle has a strong appeal right from the start. Many participants engage actively, indicating a healthy interest in the wheels offered. @Hotflashes31, the seller, provides valuable details about the wheels, confirming their authenticity as original Porsche wheel sets from a 2018 991.2 GT3. Their responses are direct and informative, catering to potential buyers' queries regarding the wheels' condition and attributes.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Lordbobbington and @abedick4247, express curiosity about shipping options and previous refinishing work, signaling that logistical arrangements are a significant concern for interested buyers. @Chartreuse adds to the inquiry by asking about the original color of the wheels and whether photos of them installed on the previous vehicle are available. @nybruin's question about the presence of TPMS sensors further underscores the practical concerns of buyers.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the wheels' condition raised by commenters like @930greg, who question if the wheels had any prior damage or curbing. The seller, @Hotflashes31, addresses these issues by affirming that there was no damage before the refinishing process, which may help alleviate some doubts among potential buyers. Overall, while the comments reflect interest, they also showcase typical buyer apprehensions regarding the product's condition and specifications.
|
 |
Positive: @kinglaw noted that the car is nice, indicating overall satisfaction with the vehicle's aesthetics. @Gearhed64 commented positively about the vehicle's underside, expressing that it looks better than expected and highlighting the benefits of the lighting system. Similarly, @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) emphasized the car's classic red exterior, promoting its appeal as a 25k-Mile 1984 Chevrolet Corvette Coupe.
Neutral: @JB1971SX expressed a desire for a bit more red in the vehicle. @MFox53 asked for a driving video, suggesting that potential buyers may want more visual evidence of the vehicle's operation. @jkws raised questions about the tire date codes, the original stereo head unit, and any available original window sticker, indicating a general curiosity about the vehicle's specifications and history.
Negative: @kinglaw raised concerns about the top being misaligned and missing a bolt, which he noted could cause noise and rattling. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) acknowledged the issue with the top and the time constraints that prevented repairs before the auction. @Millmar expressed concern about a potential ticking noise heard in the cold start video, further casting doubt on the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters overwhelmingly praise the vehicle, noting its stunning design and color. @Dollycat3 highlights the beautiful Slate Gray exterior, while @boaboyoz calls it incredibly stylish, emphasizing the exquisite build of the 911 Speedster. @Symbolic_International expresses admiration, suggesting that if Steve McQueen were alive, he would approve of this car. Enthusiasts like @Ginnmill_Racing appreciate the classic color, linking it to McQueen's heritage in the automotive world. Additionally, @ronjoe58 notes the enchanting driving experience of the Speedster, enhancing the feeling of luxury and enjoyment.
Neutral: The seller, @1600veloce, provides detailed information about the vehicle's specifications and features, highlighting the numerous customization options available. They also stress their commitment to quality service, noting that they operate their service facility and detailing shop to ensure the vehicles are in top condition before sale. Comments about the auction price range from @SLVRLF, who predicts the Speedster could fetch $450,000 to $500,000, to others discussing potential resale values, indicating the vehicle's rarity and desirability among collectors. @Purosangue raises a concern about what looks to be imperfections in one of the pictures, comparing it to wax buildup.
Negative: Amid the positive feedback, there are a few skepticism and pricing concerns from users. @mysaus11 doubts that the predicted price of $450,000 will be met, suggesting a more cautious approach to the auction environment. @Beton6 questions whether the car has certain desirable features, indicating that some buyers may seek specific attributes in this luxury market. This contrasts with the majority consensus but highlights a competitive aspect among enthusiasts and collectors that must be addressed.
|
 |
Positive: @Ondeamo expressed appreciation for the vehicle's color, both exterior and interior, and noted its well-maintained condition. The comment also highlights the enjoyment of Sunday drives in good weather, a sentiment echoed by @joynt, the seller, who explained that limiting driving to Sundays makes it easier to keep the car clean. @bondgraham complimented the car, acknowledging its attractive features, particularly the rear quarter view, indicating that it catches the eye despite his preference for another model.
Neutral: @maw06 inquired about the availability of detailed undercarriage photos, emphasizing the importance of inspecting the car's suspension components which could degrade over time. @Mikecat911 sought clarification on the vehicle's mileage history, asking @joynt about the discrepancy between the stated mileage and what was recorded on CarFax, while also wanting to know more about the ownership history.
Negative: @Mikecat911 raised concerns regarding the vehicle's reported mileage, asking if @joynt had only driven it 1,000 miles or if it was closer to 6,000, showing a desire for more transparency. Additionally, @WW711 questioned the condition of the windshield, hinting at potential maintenance issues. @joynt disclosed that due to health issues, particularly three back surgeries, it has become difficult for him to use the car, leading to minimal driving.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the vehicle's beautiful appearance and low mileage, with many expressing excitement about the auction. Enthusiastic bidders appreciate the quality and features of the Range Rover, suggesting that it is a highly sought-after model. The overall sentiment reflects a positive view towards the vehicle's condition and appeal.
Neutral: Some comments consist of inquiries regarding the auction process and additional details about the Range Rover, with bidders asking about specific features and maintenance history. While these comments do not express strong feelings either way, they indicate a general curiosity among potential buyers and a willingness to engage with the auction.
Negative: There are a few concerns mentioned by commenters about the price and whether it aligns with the vehicle's condition. Some bidders comment on comparable models and express skepticism about the auction's competitiveness. These critiques suggest that while the vehicle is generally appealing, there may be some reservations about its value.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's impressive off-roading capabilities, specifically pointing out its upgraded suspension and the inclusion of high-quality components like the Old Man Emu springs and Bilstein shocks. @general331 noted the truck's preparation for off-roading with positive remarks about its modifications, while @fortheloveofdriving detailed the enhancements made for towing and adventure. The truck's reliability is praised, as @fortheloveofdriving mentions its performance while towing a Wolf Pup trailer, affirming that it handled well in diverse conditions.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @sirjasonwelch and @bworks68, inquired about the vehicle's towing capacity and oil changes, demonstrating an interest in the truck's maintenance and versatility. @general331 also requested information about the number of keys included and whether the vehicle had been smoked in, showing engagement with the selling process. The seller responded to all queries with informative answers, which contributed to building trust and transparency regarding the vehicle's condition and history.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the minor damage reported by Carfax, with @timhoffman specifically asking about it. @fortheloveofdriving addressed these concerns, clarifying the incident and detailing the subsequent replacement of the bumper with a steel version, which helped mitigate worries about the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @Chaser81's inquiry about dog hair in the back seat prompted a response from the seller confirming that while there is some hair, the truck does not smell like a dog, indicating previous use but countering any potential negative perceptions about cleanliness.
|
 |
Positive: @rmurphy1990 praised the truck for being very clean despite its mileage, indicating that with proper maintenance it could potentially last for another 100,000 miles. He highlighted the truck's durability, especially with the 8.1L engine, which he described as great for towing. @DanielWebber also spoke positively about the truck, sharing his family’s history of using a similar model for heavy towing, which performed exceptionally well. @MountainHarvester (The Seller) expressed satisfaction with the truck's performance over the four years in his ownership, noting its impressive towing capacity and surprisingly good fuel mileage under load. @PistonWerkz echoed this sentiment, sharing his great experiences with similar trucks and stating that this vehicle, having western ownership, is likely in better condition than vehicles from rust-prone areas.
Neutral: @SmokeFan14 inquired about the brand of replacement seats, showing interest in the upgrades made to the truck. @e wyss18 asked about the severity of an oil leak mentioned in the listing, reflecting a common concern with older vehicles. @Cb1990 questioned whether the vehicle has undergone any repainting, which is relevant for potential buyers assessing the vehicle's history. @ArtistFox expressed a lighthearted concern about an aftermarket TV in the truck, indicating an awareness of the truck's features and modifications.
Negative: @MountainHarvester (The Seller) mentioned the presence of a minor oil leak that leaves a small spot on the ground after driving, which could be a concern for potential buyers. Additionally, he described the vehicle's paint as fair, noting that it hasn't had a full repaint but has some touch-ups, which might deter buyers looking for a pristine finish. Overall, while the truck has been reliable, the small issues raised could impact buyer perceptions and decisions.
|
 |
Positive: The comments showcase a lot of admiration for the Bronco, with many users expressing their appreciation for its aesthetics and craftsmanship. @okbob, @cascade_classics, and others highlighted the beauty of the vehicle, calling it a stunning and beautiful truck. @boaboyoz described it as a scintillating specimen, while @jsebby praised the outstanding build, wishing the seller luck with the auction. Overall, there's a sense of excitement regarding the truck's appearance and potential in the market.
Neutral: Comments also included inquiries about specific details regarding the vehicle's performance and craftsmanship. @joeracer69 asked about the gear ratios in the axles, indicating an interest in the technical aspects. @Yeep740 raised concerns about the quality of fit and finish, noting some flaws they observed in the pictures. These comments reflect a curiosity and desire for more information rather than outright praise or criticism.
Negative: On the more critical side, @Yeep740's comments pointed out potential flaws in the vehicle's interior and trim alignment, suggesting that for a build priced over $100,000, higher standards were expected. Although @Broncotime (The Seller) addressed these concerns by defending the quality of the build based on extensive experience, the emphasis on defects indicates that some potential buyers may not find the vehicle as flawless as others believe.
|
 |
Positive: @UPSROD praised the vehicle for having Extended Leather, indicating it's a significant feature that some may overlook. @Johncristy added that both Extended Leather and Enhanced Premium Sound are the most frequently missed amenities, thus enhancing the car’s appeal. Overall, these comments reflect a recognition of the car’s luxury features that contribute to its desirability.
Neutral: @bimmers65, the Seller, provided thorough responses regarding recent maintenance to the vehicle, detailing that it was just cleaned, the right front wheel was repaired, and tire sensors were replaced, along with regular maintenance done shortly after the purchase. The Seller also confirmed the addition of driving and walk-around videos, suggesting transparency about the car's condition and readiness for potential buyers.
Negative: @CD33 raised concerns about vehicle modifications in relation to Virginia emissions and the type of exhaust system, which could be a potential red flag for buyers in that area. @Zf232402 inquired about any current issues or needed repairs, implying a cautious approach towards the vehicle's perceived reliability. Furthermore, no receipts were available for specific repairs such as rod bearing work, which could deter buyers worried about hidden maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Porsche GT3 Touring, particularly highlighting its stunning exterior color, Dolomite Silver. @TeslaJames described the color as "powerfully gorgeous," while @Wolfenhaus remarked that it’s a beautiful car. @BMWE90Guy shared a preference for the comfort seats in the GT3 Touring, praising it over non-touring models. Additionally, multiple bidders indicated they expect the car to sell well, reflecting a strong appreciation for this specific vehicle and its features. @69_911e called it an "outstanding example," suggesting its quality is recognized among enthusiasts and potential buyers.
Neutral: Although the vehicle received positive comments, some inquiries were more focused on specific details related to its service history. @jkunk asked about the Florida service record, and @M117.961 questioned the necessity of a brake fluid flush at such low mileage. @Jaybart pointed out potential discrepancies in the information provided in the car's service documents and asked for clarification, revealing a detail-oriented perspective from potential buyers. The seller (@drivetorun) actively engaged in these discussions, providing updates about the car's mileage and service history, as well as correcting misleading information in the auction listing.
Negative: On the downside, some comments pointed to concerns regarding service records, with @jkunk questioning the transport history noted on Carfax, and others finding errors in the service documentation that could mislead bidders. @Jsilverhand criticized the RPM ranges listed in the images, and @M117.961's remark indicates doubt over the necessity of maintenance work done at such low mileage. The need for clarifications and corrections in the auction listing may create hesitancy for some potential buyers due to perceived discrepancies in the vehicle’s history.
|
 |
Positive: @GeorgeLyons (The Seller) has emphasized that this 1972 Monte Carlo is a rust-free example, well-cared for since 1975 through its previous owners. The car is touted for its classic design, lively performance around town with its 3:70 gear ratio, and a comfortable cruising capability at 70 mph. Commenters @Intimidator04 and @JayKay2430 echo this sentiment, appreciating the classic's fun driving experience and reliability compared to modern vehicles. They emphasize that the styling and soul of classic cars make them far superior to the 'junk' currently produced, as @Intimidator04 puts it.
Neutral: Some comments raise practical questions about the vehicle, including the conversion of the A/C system to R134 by @Tessie19 and concerns regarding fluid leaks voiced by @azmike51. @Motorbreath302 also inquires about the state of the vinyl top and any potential bubbling. @yrhmblhst makes a critical observation about the underside photos not matching the vehicle in question, pointing out discrepancies in the black color and features. @GeorgeLyons (The Seller) acknowledges these oversights and promises to correct the mistakes, reaffirming the car's excellent condition and no issues beneath the vinyl top.
Negative: On the downside, @yrhmblhst's concerns about the photo discrepancies reflect some doubt regarding the auction's integrity. They suspect that images might have been mixed, suggesting a lack of careful curation in the listing. Additionally, @sosweats's comment was flagged as non-constructive, indicating that there may be varying levels of engagement from the community, with some members possibly perceiving the auction as less than reputable. There are also queries about the original wheels by @johnny0620, to which @GeorgeLyons (The Seller) responds that while the original Rally Wheels are not available, they can be sourced if desired, which may not entirely alleviate concerns.
|
 |
Positive: @IRV_RO (The Seller) confirmed that the vehicle has been converted to a dual timing chain, which is a positive aspect for potential buyers looking for reliability in the engine's performance. There is also a proactive approach in addressing customer inquiries, as demonstrated by @IRV_RO providing additional information about the engine's oil pressure and consistency after driving the vehicle for an hour.
Neutral: Several comments seek clarification regarding specific features and components of the vehicle. @PJatPM inquired about the absence of a hard top and the condition of the dashboard, to which @IRV_RO (The Seller) responded with clarity, offering to provide more photos if needed. This shows that while the vehicle has some appeal, potential buyers are looking for more detailed information to assess its overall value.
Negative: @flyingdago expressed concern about the oil pressure, suggesting it might be weak based on observations made during startup. Although @IRV_RO (The Seller) attempted to address this by explaining that the oil pressure behaves differently when the engine is warm, the initial impression could raise doubts about the vehicle's condition for some buyers, leading to negative perceptions.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as a "groovy green over green Super Bee," expressing delight and wishing the seller luck with the sale. @MoparMan praises the car's appearance, complimenting the pictures that showcase the beautiful green color. @dfrazz calls the car a "great looking triple pickle Bee!" and conveys enthusiasm about the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @billccm, @dzguy, and @Clin10, request additional information and photos to clarify details about the vehicle. @kupton (The Seller) responds to inquiries regarding engine details and pictures, indicating that they have provided some of the requested information. @haveatrailor asks for videos of the car running, demonstrating a proactive interest in the car's functionality.
Negative: A few concerns are raised by @dzguy and @Clin10, questioning the condition of the car regarding rust and requesting verified information about engine components. However, @kupton (The Seller) assures that they are not aware of any rust issues and that the car runs beautifully, addressing these worries. @MoparSS expresses concern about the car's readiness for long-distance travel, seeking confirmation regarding the vehicle's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @stan praised the car, describing it as beautiful and nicely modified, although he would prefer to remove the GS badges. @Myoldcut remarked on the car's rarity, likening it to the Buick's version of the Rally 350. @msjbythebay complimented the car's clean appearance and tasteful modifications, also sharing a personal connection from owning a factory original. Overall, many commenters, including @HVACMAN63, mentioned the fun and appreciation they received for the vehicle at local shows, highlighting its appeal to classic car enthusiasts.
Neutral: There was some discussion regarding the car's authenticity, with @msjbythebay and @ilikebmx999 questioning the validity of some tags and VIN information. @HVACMAN63 interjected to clarify that the car was built in Fremont, California, even though there might have been confusion with the body tag. Comments from users such as @bringatrailer acknowledged the updates made to the listing based on community feedback, demonstrating a collaborative effort in gathering information.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, some users pointed out discrepancies and raised concerns that sparked debate. @hairyolds777 flagged a comment as non-constructive, while @GrampaD expressed frustration over nitpicking regarding the car's modifications. Additionally, concerns about potential oil leaks were raised by @malouhos, reflecting the scrutiny some users feel towards the car's condition, and @WIZZZZ sought clarity on the vehicle's classification, questioning if it really was a GS.
|
 |
Positive: @willwill praises the 4-cylinder 1.9 engine for its reliability and performance, stating it can handle well under pressure and has a timing chain for longevity. He enjoys the car's nimbleness and driving experience, highlighting its manual top as a convenient feature. @CharlotteWheels, the seller, echoes this sentiment, emphasizing the fun of driving the Z3 on winding roads and planning to upload a cold start video. Many comments appreciate the vehicle's low mileage, the new top, and its appealing wrap color.
Neutral: @rexfox inquires about the radiator and AC functionality, while @Husabergjoe questions the choice of wrap on the car. @2002dave provides a supportive comment about the car being a fantastic driver, and @PreludeDude reminisces about the car's design history. @jpbat79 and @Smick75 ask about the original stereo and seat issues, respectively, showing interest in the vehicle's originality.
Negative: @Smick75 expresses concerns about potential seat shifting issues, and @yagizyakin and @josehbraga05 question the condition of the paint under the wrap, suggesting the original color may be preferable. @Husabergjoe goes as far as to say that the wrap has ruined a beautiful car, indicating a negative view towards the vehicle's current appearance.
|
 |
Positive: @Kurte551 (The Seller) describes the vehicle as ahead of its time and technically competent even today, noting its impressive handling and quick turbo spooling. He highlights that the car runs and drives great, with functioning features like cold AC and heat, indicating that it is ready for adventures. Additionally, he mentions the presence of T-top glass covers for storage, enhancing the car's usability.
Neutral: Comments from users like @norvell7011 request further clarification about the vehicle's upkeep, including inquiries about tire date codes, leaks from the engine or transmission, and the condition of the T-top window covering. @Kurte551 (The Seller) responds by providing specific information about the vehicle's condition, addressing concerns about leaks and confirming that all interior electronics are functioning properly. However, there is an ongoing request for the date and mileage of the timing belt service, with the seller confirming that receipts are available.
Negative: Concerns from commentators such as @mayasupra regarding flood debris raise questions about the car's history, leading @Kurte551 (The Seller) to clarify that any damages were related to road debris rather than flooding. There are also humorous comments like those from @Chim suggesting errors in price entries on platforms, which may create doubts about the authenticity of the listing. Overall, while there are satisfactory replies from the seller concerning car details, the lingering concerns about damage or repairs might deter some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @LOL_no describes the vehicle as a great choice for someone who prefers to blend in and enjoy a quieter ride on the highway. @casciomotors (The Seller) shares positive remarks about the Jeep Gladiator's performance, highlighting its smooth driving experience despite its modifications and large wheels. The seller expresses surprise at how well the Jeep handles on the road, suggesting that potential buyers should check out a posted video to fully appreciate its capabilities.
Neutral: Comments from @zman and @missmyF4302023 indicate a desire for more information regarding ride quality, gas mileage, and warranty specifics. @zman poses questions about factors such as ride comfort and driving performance at different speeds. Additionally, there is an exchange between @06M3zcp and @casciomotors (The Seller) regarding the axle ratios of current Wrangler 392 models, showcasing a discussion about vehicle specifications without strong bias toward any opinion.
Negative: @anthonyjp mentions that while the vehicle is cool, they seek something more distinctive. Meanwhile, @DaveTea raises concerns about the headlights possibly blinding oncoming traffic, a common issue with modified vehicles. Furthermore, @jg76015 critiques the Jeep's design, suggesting it might be best suited for slow driving, implying it lacks performance for more serious off-roading, and hints at the need for significant upgrades to handle tougher terrains.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, describing it as beautiful and a classic example of the E39 series. @Jadams215 noted it was "gorgeous" and @Fartparts expressed enthusiasm with a simple "Swoooon". Others, like @DThiry88, anticipate a high sale price for the car, which they think should do well due to its quality. @machtig pointed out the car's excellent condition, highlighting features such as a clean undercarriage and various upgrades, while @Tripledigit appreciated its silver color, equating it to a stylish appearance akin to film references.
Neutral: Several commenters were curious about the car's history and condition. Questions ranged from the specifics of the vehicle's past, including the number of previous owners as mentioned by @BiloSelhi, to inquiries about maintenance and service records. The seller, @silverarrowcarsltd, responded to these inquiries, clarifying details about the car's smog certification and offering to provide further documentation. There was also curiosity about whether the car had been smogged recently for California regulations, which @silverarrowcarsltd confirmed, indicating good standing for potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, some concern was raised regarding misinformation in promotional materials. @any1b0gu initially criticized a service video shared by the seller, insisting it misrepresented the car, but later retracted those comments. Other commenters shared worries about potential mechanical issues, such as vibrations at certain speeds, as noted by @s65_rick. The seller, @silverarrowcarsltd, acknowledged these concerns and promised to provide additional video evidence to clarify the situation and address potential buyer apprehensions.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the beauty and desirability of the 1963 Falcon, with @Dollycat3 calling it "absolutely beautiful" and @LMGun praising it as a quintessential design from one of the best automotive years in history. Enthusiasts like @neverenoughgold and @surf-n-drag appreciate its potential to draw attention at gatherings like Cars ‘N Coffee, emphasizing its eye-catching appeal. Additionally, @m2711c notes the spaciousness of the engine bay, suggesting that it is a pleasure to work on, which enhances the car's allure for mechanics and enthusiasts alike.
Neutral: Some commentors provide insights into the car's historical context and technical aspects. @gocorcoran inquires about the permanent PCV system, in contrast to the road draft tube, reflecting an interest in its engineering. @Ypss36 asks about the transmission modifications, to which @DocRobin (The Seller) responds, clarifying that the shifter was changed to a floor mount with the automatic transmission. The dialogue among the users illustrates a community engaged in discussing the finer points of the Falcon's design and modifications, alongside personal anecdotes that strengthen their connection to the car.
Negative: While the discussion remains largely positive, there are some concerns regarding the seller's communication. @Hoppy18 mentions that the seller has not engaged with comments since the auction launched, implying that this may not help their chances of a successful sale. @DocRobin (The Seller) acknowledges this as their first auction on BaT and admits a lack of understanding regarding expectations for communication during the auction process. Such observations suggest potential challenges in the seller's experience that could impact the auction's reception.
|
Mid-Engined Honda K-Series–Powered 1993 Rover Mini 6-Speed
SAXXNWAXKBD066674
Lot 208750
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commenters have enthusiastically praised the vehicle, referring to it as a 'solid opening bid' and a 'beautiful build.' @leejohnw described it as the 'Singer of Minis,' highlighting its impressive modifications. @GoesTo11Guelph expressed excitement for a driving video, while @Sherlock noted the thoughtful construction of the car. Many, like @Coolvintage and @4wheelsandamotor, have marveled at the 'fantastic build quality' and the attention to detail, with statements like 'every time you look at it you catch a new detail.' It's clear that the vehicle has garnered significant admiration from the community, both for its aesthetic appeal and engineering prowess, with several commenters drawing comparisons to high-end designs.
Neutral: Some comments focused on specific aspects of the vehicle that warranted further information or clarification. @Dmart121 humorously queried about fitting in the car while others like @Arya and @biker_60 raised questions about registration in California and the car's power-to-weight ratio. @jtimmons1197 asked about the engine's modifications and potential dyno info, indicating an interest in the specifics of the build without overt bias. The discussion also included inquiries about the driveability and handling dynamics, emphasizing a shared curiosity among commenters about how the modifications impact everyday usability.
Negative: Conversely, there were some critical remarks regarding the vehicle. @spencer pointed out the absence of a 'SHARP HAZARD' warning label on the arm rests, while @RNLabas expressed skepticism about the seller's claims regarding the vehicle’s marketability, suggesting there could be financial pitfalls for the seller. @kjames600 cautioned that registering the car in California might be more complex than suggested due to the custom modifications, pointing to potential regulatory challenges. Overall, while there was much admiration, these comments reflect a cautious perspective on the vehicle's practical considerations.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting it as a fine specimen of a Town Car, with @maw06 praising its preservation and suitability for long-distance trips due to its reliability, comfort, and impressive undercarriage condition. @CisconFrisco also noted the car's appeal and described the owner as very cool after viewing the car in person. Overall, there is a strong appreciation for the craftsmanship and features of the Town Car, indicating it holds a fond place in the hearts of many car enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters posed questions regarding the car's condition and history. @Wrmccourt asked about specific maintenance records and the rear quarter panel's paint, while @classicar79 inquired about marks on the driver's seat and original documentation. The seller, @cutoosunny, provided detailed and prompt responses, clarifying maintenance issues and offering additional photos, which suggests transparency and willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the car, most notably by @johnny0620 who expressed his displeasure with the vehicle's color and roof cover. Additionally, @maw06 pointed out that the washer fluid was nearly empty, indicating a minor maintenance oversight. @Wrmccourt's questions about the blendoor and paint history also hint at potential issues that could deter some buyers, creating a mix of apprehension alongside the positive comments.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, especially its color, with @Tremelune noting that it would be hard pressed to find a better color for a British roadster. @Aridgerunner appreciated the new pictures of the MGA's underside, stating they sufficiently displayed the general condition and confirmed the presence of front drum brakes as expected for all 1500 models. The seller, @Tom_Yearick, also emphasized that the condition of the bottom of the car is as good as the top, reinforcing the car's overall quality.
Neutral: There were various inquiries and observations regarding the authenticity and specifics of the vehicle's components. Commenters like @P30 and @Dr95630 raised questions about potential modifications and deviations from stock MGA parts, suggesting that changes were made to the suspension and transmission attachments. @kmardell pondered if the original frame crossmember had been replaced, while others, such as @tim_t, indicated that some images appeared to depict a different model entirely, specifically an Austin Healey 3000, leading to a misunderstanding about the vehicle being sold.
Negative: There were several concerns related to the seller's representation of the vehicle's underside, with @rossak and @hkastensmith questioning the authenticity of the images initially provided. Many commenters suggested that the seller had mistakenly uploaded photos of a different car, which could lead to mistrust. @mjstavalone expressed confusion over whether the images presented were indeed representative of the MGA, indicative of overall skepticism regarding the vehicle's modifications and the seller's accuracy in his description.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the car's stunning aesthetics and restoration quality. @EddieNap described it as a "Beautiful Shelby," while @Dicko66 praised it as "Complete with a Bob Perkins resto" and appreciated the color. Several others, like @RedGTvert and @georgepehanick, remarked on the gorgeous color combination of Gulfstream Aqua and white interior, highlighting how it looks even better in person. The vehicle’s restoration drew attention, with @Rickc7c8 noting minimal mileage since restoration, indicating it's still in excellent condition, which was echoed by @RiffRaff who described it as a "beautiful example" of a 1969 Shelby GT500 Fastback.
Neutral: Questions regarding the car's specifics were raised by several users. @Chevfvr inquired about the originality of the engine and whether the front fenders or rear quarters were replaced during restoration. @Gopher428 clarified the car’s low mileage since restoration, indicating it appears too pristine to drive. @LW57 requested information about the original steering wheel's condition and whether the aftermarket wrap was necessary. While there was some discussion about the car's stance, @Rickc7c8 noted that the car was restored to include an NOS bottom spring, which could affect how it sits.
Negative: Some comments displayed concerns about the potential issues with a car that has rarely been driven. @Chicagomike cautioned against the risks associated with a car that has seen little use, while @shelbymann70 shared similar sentiments based on personal experience but emphasized that their car had not faced severe problems despite minimal driving. Questions about the steering wheel wrap also sparked a debate about its authenticity, with @Shelby2 arguing that it was aftermarket while others provided evidence to the contrary. These discussions hinted at a mix of skepticism surrounding the car's modifications and its long-term usability.
|
 |
Positive: @mkxair appreciates the classic color combination of the vehicle, calling it deluxe and timeless. @GDogg expresses admiration for the extraordinary design of the 992.1 Turbo S Cabriolet, extending best wishes. @boaboyoz describes the charming Chalk color of the 992.1 Turbo S, specifically noting how the Bordeaux Red accents stand out beautifully in this build. @Jack-Porsche comments on the appeal of the Turbo S as an everyday supercar, and he is pleased with the specified characteristics of this particular model. @h_bakken shares an opinion on the ideal spec of the vehicle, highlighting the attractive chalk and red Bordeaux color combo and expressing a wish to upgrade from his current model.
Neutral: @theshoe, the seller, notes that the car has a full paint protection film (PPF), suggesting an additional benefit for potential buyers. @phildeez010 inquires whether the dealer will provide financing options if needed, indicating interest in purchasing but requiring more information about financial arrangements.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: @Al_Swearengen praised the vehicle as a pretty car that is nicely done, expressing his personal preference for stock hoods but acknowledging the vehicle's attractive design. @MarkBartlett referred to the car as beautifully set up, while @Longforlineup also admired it, describing it as a beautiful ride and wishing the seller good luck. There is a general consensus among commenters about the vehicle's aesthetic and build quality, indicating an appreciation for the craftsmanship and overall appearance of the Camaro.
Neutral: @vstol (The Seller) provided detailed insights into the car's history, clarifying that it is truly rust-free and noting the extensive updates made during his ownership, which spans six years and 1,000 miles. The seller highlighted features such as the CPP Hydrastop that enhances brake performance, making it adaptable for larger engine builds. Multiple videos were shared to illustrate the car's condition, including a cold start and a walk-around showing off the paint and body as well as the engine sounds, showcasing transparency regarding its condition and performance.
Negative: Some comments suggest a desire for modifications, such as @ssterry expressing willingness to trade performance for a flat hood, indicating a preference that may not align with the current design. Additionally, @BigAntlers requested a cold start video, reflecting some skepticism about the performance without firsthand experience of the vehicle's features. Though there was overall positivity, such requests could imply concerns about the car’s authenticity or condition as highlighted by the seller.
|
 |
Positive: @OldIron138 expressed enthusiasm for Hudson convertibles from this era, highlighting the beauty of the car and its potential appeal on the BaT platform. @Slam105 noted the rarity of the 1947 Hudson drop-top, emphasizing it as a unique find in any neighborhood. @Dollycat3 also commented on the car's beauty and rarity, praising its striking color combination. @neilpierson25 was impressed by the vehicle's unique features, referring to it as 'superhero transportation.' @Shineapony found the car to be visually appealing and sought clarification regarding the paint quality.
Neutral: @Rfh31949 (The Seller) provided information about the car being in a climate-controlled garage for over 50 years, which suggests it has been well-preserved. @Ranchero65 inquired about the name 'Quaker Gray' and its association with the color of oatmeal, showing curiosity about the vehicle's color. @mjb7477 asked practical questions about the paint condition, any potential leaks or mechanical issues, and the status of the title, indicating a desire for transparency regarding the vehicle's condition.
Negative: The only negative feedback stemmed from @mjb7477's inquiries about the car's paint condition and any leaks or mechanical issues, which might imply concern about the vehicle's overall condition or maintenance history. There are no strong negative comments or criticisms present in the discussion.
|
 |
Positive: @RecoveringAtty describes this vehicle as the best performance sedan for the money. @Mongoose55 praises it as an absolute tour de force of sedan listings, highlighting the impressive array of vehicles being presented, including this Porsche. @missionrpm mentions the appealing Agate over Cognac interior combination and expresses confidence that it will perform well on the market. @Tenniscoach notes that driving this Panamera Turbo S adds a thrill to life, consistently putting a smile on the face of its driver. @HAPPY finds humor in how the early Panameras are gaining popularity and appreciates the rich look of the car, particularly the Turbo S.
Neutral: @Williamjweiner raises concerns regarding the lack of repair records since 2020, while @RVOFI inquires if all controls function properly and requests the tire date codes. @Nacoocheejohn asks for comprehensive paint meter readings. @LawrenceHenderson requests a copy of the original sticker or build sheet for further detail. @Dogslovetrucks seeks information about specific damages to the vehicle and its history, including whether it had been a smoker's car. @bhayes92645 finds the asking price of $24,970 to be reasonable, noting that they will consider it further.
Negative: @Williamjweiner expresses frustration over the seller's lack of communication, suggesting that the seller has not replied to potential buyers. @campodf questions the vehicle's pricing and its perceived undervaluation in the market, mentioning their own experience with a similar model. These comments reflect concerns about transparency regarding vehicle conditions and the seller's responsiveness, which may impact potential buyers' confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @cauci (The Seller) mentioned that the previous owner was the original and encouraged potential buyers to review the carfax report for accuracy, lending some credibility to the vehicle's history. @caseyscars highlighted that the inspection was transparent, pointing out issues like RMS seepage and coolant reservoir stress cracks, but also noted that these are common and manageable, suggesting that the vehicle was honestly listed. @cauci (The Seller) appreciated the feedback from @caseyscars and reaffirmed that the inspecting shop did not find any work needing immediate attention, which is reassuring for potential buyers.
Neutral: @carlriggs5 inquired about an estimate for the repairs needed, such as those for the coolant and engine mounts, indicating a desire for more detailed information about the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @carlriggs5 asked if there was any video available showing the convertible top operation, showing an interest in the car's features. @cauci (The Seller) responded that no estimates were given during the inspection and confirmed that the shop had not advised any immediate repairs, which leaves some uncertainty for buyers looking for clarity.
Negative: While the inspection noted some issues such as RMS seepage and stress cracks in the coolant reservoir, there is potential concern as @caseyscars warned that failure of the coolant reservoir could leave the driver stranded if it were to happen. The lack of immediate recommendations for repairs also left @carlriggs5 seeking more comprehensive information, which could suggest that the vehicle may need attention sooner rather than later, causing unease for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @MattAZ fondly reminisces about his own experience with a similar ’72 Nova SS, appreciating this one for its lack of rust, bondo, and leaks. @C3Lee confirms the authenticity of the SS per the VIN and L48, suggesting that, while the colors have changed, they have improved the vehicle's appeal. Additionally, @MonteCutlass expresses nostalgia for the vehicle, noting it resembles his late friend's car and evokes memories of fun times. @WishfulThinker23 also praises the Nova, expressing appreciation for its character despite some rough paint, stating personal preference plays a role in whether a paint job is necessary.
Neutral: @zackmoore (The Seller) confirms the original SS 350 status of the car and responds to comments about the missing radio and AC components offered solutions for retrofitting. @dunpartn questions the removal of OEM AC parts, while @SSPEL1962 seeks specific details about the vehicle's cylinder heads and axle codes, highlighting common concerns prospective buyers may have about originality and condition. The discussions also include the car's overall authenticity, with @treyster211 asking about the build sheet, which the seller clarifies is not available, yet information can still be derived from the VIN.
Negative: While many comments are positive, certain remarks hint at concern, such as @dunpartn's inquiry into the removal of AC components, suggesting a possible negative impact on functionality. @R7S explicitly mentions the need for a paint job, a sentiment supported by another commenter, though @WishfulThinker23 counters this by stating that it depends on personal taste. @Pontiacs4evr critiques the car's color, saying that while it is '99% perfect,' he prefers a different aesthetic, indicating that not all viewers were fully satisfied with the vehicle's appearance.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, describing it as stunning and beautifully maintained. @TSR90210 mentioned the car's cleanliness and acknowledged that finding a Corvette of this age in such great condition is rare. @dkyranakis confirmed that the low mileage should lessen concerns about the heads, praising the vehicle and encouraging potential bidders to have confidence in the purchase. Commenters appreciated the seller's passionate description of the Corvette's heritage and contributions to American automotive history, creating a vibrant excitement about the ongoing auction.
Neutral: Several participants sought clarification and offered insights regarding the car's condition and specifications. @ls1auto asked about the number of previous owners, while @msteiner inquired specifically about the service history of the valve guides in the heads. @obturate questioned the factory specifications regarding the hood badge, and @mderr requested additional pictures in sunlight, which the seller promptly provided. The seller's responses, including their commitment to preserving the original condition of the car, helped address potential buyers' concerns about maintenance and modifications.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about the seller's promotional approach. @rabbitholepunch critiqued the seller's marketing pitch as overly theatrical, likening it to a used car salesman spiel. Although they acknowledged the car's excellent condition, the tone suggested skepticism about the seller's transparency. Additionally, @msteiner expressed concerns regarding the head issues associated with the LS7 engine, reflecting a common hesitation among potential buyers about the long-term maintenance of high-performance vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it a 'stunning 911SC' and highlighting its pristine condition. @eddieames mentioned the car's beauty, emphasizing that owning a bright red SC 911 keeps one feeling young. @TSR90210 reflected on nostalgic memories associated with seeing Porsches in their youth, while @B.Fryk described the SC as automotive art, noting its muscular design and high status among car enthusiasts. @GasolineAlleyGarage (The Seller) received praise for providing detailed information about the maintenance and condition of the vehicle, including its clean California title and excellent leak-down test results.
Neutral: Several comments raised questions about the vehicle's history, particularly regarding past damage and maintenance records. @ksaman inquired about the air conditioning system, and @tbone65melon asked about any previous damage from an accident, reflecting a desire for transparency. @GasolineAlleyGarage (The Seller) responded that the A/C was disconnected years ago and provided updates about the minor accident, which turned out to be a scrape rather than a serious collision. Commenters expressed understanding of the seller's situation, noting the lack of comprehensive records after the owner's passing, reinforcing the car's classic status despite some uncertainties.
Negative: Some commenters were skeptical about the seller's disclosure of the vehicle's history, with @PappaG1 specifically urging for clarity regarding the minor damage it sustained and questioning the thoroughness of the seller's communication. @Fordmjs and @TIRacing expressed frustration over how prospective buyers scrutinize details without having bid on vehicles themselves. Additional inquiries about the vehicle's condition and whether maintenance records could be obtained indicated a lack of trust among bidders, particularly concerning the updates for head studs and chain tensioners that were not documented. These concerns were met with efforts from the seller to assure potential buyers about the car's excellent condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally express admiration for the car's features and condition. @Evo9850r highlights the "gorgeous spec" and praises the "quilted leather with the carbon accents," noting the added value of the carbon brakes. Additionally, @Jims4re (The Seller) describes the car as "even better than described" in the previous auction, indicating a level of satisfaction with both the vehicle and the buying experience. The previous owner, @Dryfly, recounts a positive transaction with an appreciative buyer, suggesting the car has been well-regarded in its history.
Neutral: Some comments provide background information on the seller's selling behavior and context regarding the car's current sale. @GSJohnson57 inquires about the reason for selling so soon after purchase, prompting @tjvanpat to note that the seller has a pattern of buying and selling cars within a short timeframe. This suggests a business-like approach to vehicle ownership rather than a personal attachment. @Jims4re (The Seller) also clarifies an error in the listing regarding the radar detector type while maintaining a respectful tone.
Negative: There is a hint of skepticism surrounding the seller's motives, particularly from @GSJohnson57, who questions the quick resale of the vehicle. This skepticism is echoed by @tjvanpat, who points out the seller's history with buying and selling cars, implying that this might not be an ideal purchase for buyers looking for a long-term investment. Additionally, @Jims4re (The Seller) reveals that personal circumstances, specifically his wife's medical issues, are forcing the sale, which adds a layer of urgency and may evoke sympathy but also raises questions about the timing of the sale.
|
 |
Positive: The feedback about the vehicle highlights its excellent condition and rarity, with @Symbolic_International (The Seller) emphasizing its unique specifications and very low mileage of just under 7,500 miles, which is quite unusual for a vehicle of this type. Reviewers like @NoBea93 have praised the layout as perfect for serious travel, indicating that it is more than just a typical conversion van. Additionally, the vibrant excitement from commentors such as @MarkTheSharkNYC shows that people find the vehicle to be a pristine classic, reflecting a high interest in the auction and its potential as a valuable investment.
Neutral: Several neutral comments bring various practical inquiries and considerations. @bmccuen asked about the towing capacity, and @Rjw3 inquired about the number of seat belts, showcasing a need for detailed specifications. @Alfaman67 and @NORTHBAY posed questions regarding additional features like table storage and vehicle height. These questions reflect a balanced consideration of the vehicle's capabilities and usage for prospective buyers.
Negative: On the negative side, some comments hint at skepticism regarding the vehicle's history and maintenance. @JohnOKeefe expressed doubts about the replacement of tires worn to 4/32, questioning whether it was due to actual wear or age. @Haroldwashington raised concerns about the DEF tank and whether it was necessary for this older model. These comments suggest that potential buyers are cautious and seek reassurance about the vehicle's condition and history.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle with high enthusiasm, highlighting its stunning appearance and quality build. @WorldofWayne remarked on its beauty, calling it another beautiful pony on BaT. @Husky44 expressed a desire to experience the car's impressive suspension setup, while @Trailboss described it as a beautiful Mustang deserving big dollars. The paint color also received compliments from @GrigioF430 and @funkaholik, who appreciated the modifications, particularly the blacked-out headlights and the 1969 tail panel that transformed it. Overall, numerous commenters like @c_jakob5 and @emiyahar expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it gorgeous and amazing.
Neutral: The seller, @Drookster2050, actively engaged with potential buyers by providing information and answering questions. He confirmed he had uploaded driving videos at the request of @hoffmanjp and addressed inquiries about the vehicle's specifications, including suspension adjustments and engine performance. Several comments from @dochorton and @BigWings discussed potential modifications and horsepower estimates, indicating an active discussion surrounding performance enhancements. The seller also shared insights about the build process, including his efforts to get the stance just right and enjoy the new space at his property.
Negative: While there was a lot of enthusiasm, some concerns were raised about the vehicle's performance. @Royce59 suggested that the seller should provide driving videos to showcase the car's capabilities, indicating uncertainty regarding its shifting. @Royce59 further noted issues with shift pressures and potential gear whine, prompting discussion on the necessary adjustments as the vehicle is still being broken in. @coronet68 acknowledged this concern while expressing confidence in the seller's honesty. Overall, while the vehicle garnered much praise, these comments hinted at a desire for reassurance concerning its performance and reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @CarolineEader (The Seller) confirmed that the vehicle has been well maintained and is smoke-free, which can indicate a good environment for the car's preservation. She also mentioned that there are no issues with the paint and that the air conditioning system works fine, reassurances that often appeal to potential buyers. Additionally, she provided information about a new battery that was installed recently, which enhances the vehicle's immediate reliability for new owners.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed the Nissan 370Z's engine issues with varying perspectives. @KrisA noted that the VQ37VHR engine does not generally suffer from the oil gallery gasket problem that affected earlier models, while @Relocate777 argued that early production runs did experience these issues. The conversation also included inquiries about the vehicle's key fobs and its history, indicating that potential buyers are generally cautious and attentive to details about the car's condition and services.
Negative: @Sobonuke pointed out that the vehicle appeared dusty and mentioned cobwebs, which could imply a lack of use and possible neglect in maintenance beyond basic upkeep. Furthermore, questions about the reason for selling and concerns about the overall state of the vehicle might create doubts for interested buyers about the car's long-term reliability and care. @76ming raised concerns regarding potential paint issues and mechanical problems, highlighting apprehensions that prospective buyers might have before making a purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @KAJL describes the vehicle as a 'beaut,' indicating a strong aesthetic appeal. @Nachocheeze60 expresses excitement about the beauty of the truck and humorously mentions the challenge of hiding it from his wife. @1600veloce (The Seller) provides a thorough overview of the vehicle, highlighting its custom order features and the meticulous care taken by his team in detailing all vehicles. Other commentors such as @boaboyoz and @pelons52 echo similar sentiments, with @boaboyoz stating that any truck from @1600veloce is sure to be a beauty, and @pelons52 appreciating the craftsmanship that makes the Apache 3200 a clean ride overall.
Neutral: Commentors like @NIKISUPREME appreciate the variety offered by sellers on BaT, without specific remarks about the vehicle itself. @Mr1put and @Hum4 have requested specific details such as pictures of the gas tank and VIN plate, indicating an interest in verifying original parts but do not provide any opinions. @Evan-Manning asks for more information regarding rust and corrosion levels, pointing out the importance of transparency in the listing. The dialogue suggests an engaged audience actively seeking information about the truck's condition, which could influence their purchasing decisions.
Negative: Concerns regarding the video accessibility were raised by @hdbaggerdude, who struggled to open the videos related to the truck, questioning whether this issue affected bids. Other users like @erzmo suggested that the driving video lacked crucial details such as gauge readings, implying that it could have been more informative. @hdbaggerdude mentioned that the inability to access videos might be contributing to lower interest in the auction. This feedback indicates some frustration among potential buyers who feel the current media presentation does not meet their expectations.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the car's beautiful appearance, with @solarfish praising its Cobalt color that shifts in hue depending on lighting. @Maxismile appreciates @coupefan's transparency regarding the vehicle's known issues, emphasizing the seller's forthrightness as admirable. Additionally, @radcrujones finds the seller's approach to disclosure comforting and expresses interest in the condition of the vehicle's oil changes, which @coupefan confirms have been consistently maintained.
Neutral: @targa4me raises a question about whether the car has been serviced at a Porsche dealership, to which @coupefan responds that it has always been serviced at a well-known Porsche specialist. @heywatchit suggests budgeting for repairs, estimating around $4-5k for immediate needs and $1500 for tires, which @coupefan acknowledges as a reasonable suggestion. The discussions also touch on the factors of the auctioning process, with @242bryan mentioning the need for caution and the importance of being informed while bidding.
Negative: Concerns are notably raised regarding the car's maintenance needs, including an oil leak and suspension squeak, as pointed out by various commenters like @Segura911 and @heywatchit. @242bryan questions the absence of amber on the headlights and the history of potential changes that may raise red flags. Additionally, @242bryan describes the auction process as potentially risky, indicating a sense of uncertainty, while @Sharku2492 is inquiring about details surrounding the transmission and clutch replacement, suggesting a lack of clarity on maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: @ChrisCook53 (The Seller) highlights that the vehicle is in perfect mechanical condition and runs and drives like a dream. @UncleJB appreciates the color of the car and expresses love for these little VW's. @KurtBWNews shares a nostalgic experience of driving a VW Polo in Germany, suggesting that the car is enjoyable and fun.
Neutral: @onedaysomeday mentions the unique aspect of the vehicle as an import to the States, reflecting on a past experience with a Fiat Punto. @Zeerock0203 inquires about the inclusion of original parts in the sale. @rexfox expresses a desire to find a Polo after renting them in Mexico and Europe, indicating some sentimentality towards the model.
Negative: @PineappleMisfit raises a concern about rust around the sunroof, which @ChrisCook53 confirms and indicates he has pictures available. @HellcatNation asks about the repairability of the rust and potential leaks, to which the seller responds that it is relatively easy to repair and that he hasn’t noticed any leaks. However, @imabigdipper warns that there is a significant transmission leak from the input shaft seal, cautioning potential buyers about this common issue with the vehicle's transmission.
|
 |
Positive: @Motordad8 fondly recalls memories associated with the bike, stating he bought a similar model brand new in 1998, emphasizing its ability to pull wheelies and the appealing sound of its V-twin engine. @buttesilverbow also shares positive experiences, highlighting the bike's excellent performance, comfort for lane splitting, and its all-around capability. @Hercule_LaJoy mentions how the bike is more than the sum of its parts, praising the fun he had and modding it with different wheels, while @rofanfoy expresses his love for the bike and its reliability, feeling it's an overlooked gem with impressive power and torque.
Neutral: @RedRon expresses curiosity about the bike, indicating he wasn't aware of its existence prior and plans to learn more about it. @misterco recalls his experience test riding a model of the bike, finding it thrilling but ultimately deciding to stick to a different model. @josewales inquires about the condition of the tires, reflecting a practical interest in the maintenance and safety aspects of the bike.
Negative: While there aren't overtly negative comments, @Hercule_LaJoy mentions a minor issue with the bike's large carburetors, stating they can drain the small tank quickly, suggesting it could be a drawback for some riders. However, the overall sentiment around the bike remains largely positive, with only subtle criticisms noted in terms of fuel consumption.
|
 |
Positive: @KarmannClassic expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle's unique features, mentioning that they would buy the car just for the included Beastie Boys cassette. They also describe the R107 as beautiful. @Majuba compliments the Milan Brown Metallic paint, stating it adds to the car's appeal. Similarly, @Bird_man shares a strong desire for a brown Benz, indicating that the color is a personal favorite.
Neutral: The seller, @aubingho, provides detailed information about the vehicle, indicating they love the car but need to sell it. They address potential buyers' questions about the air conditioning system, clarifying that it usually works but can start with uncooled air. The seller also includes a note about a fitted car cover being part of the sale and mentions that the battery is relatively new, although they misplaced the receipt. They are open to inquiries from interested buyers.
Negative: @JarrodG72 raises a concern about the vehicle's speedometer, suggesting it can be fixed but noting it may affect the cruise control system. They also inquire about the air conditioning's functionality, indicating some potential maintenance issues. @JFrankP expresses a preference for a different aesthetic, stating the car feels more like Paul's Boutique than License to Ill, hinting that the vehicle's styling may not appeal to everyone.
|
 |
Positive: @Bull49 expressed excitement about finding a unique car on BaT, indicating a genuine interest in the vehicle. @jtown333, the seller, welcomed inquiries from potential bidders and encouraged engagement, fostering a positive atmosphere for the auction. This shows that the seller is open and willing to provide information, which can enhance buyer confidence and interest.
Neutral: @nnorvell7011, a potential buyer, raised various questions regarding the vehicle's condition and functionality, demonstrating a thoughtful approach to the purchase. The seller responded positively, confirming the functioning of the A/C and most electronics, and addressing rust and leak inquiries with transparency. The discussion indicates a healthy exchange of information, allowing potential buyers to make informed decisions.
Negative: @jtown333 disclosed recent issues with the vehicle's headlights, noting that the stock relay had failed and that only the low beams are currently operational. This could be a concern for potential buyers, as it highlights an unexpected complication that may require further attention or repair. The seller's admission of not knowing the replacement history for the timing belt and water pump may also raise flags about the vehicle's overall maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its stunning appearance and unique color combination. @Turbowned highlighted the rarity of post-2008 DB9s not featuring a black exterior or interior, while @evokes also praised the exceptional color pairing. @WisdomFirst felt transported to 'silver and red leather heaven,' and @RapalaBill pointed out that the color and leather combination was 'beyond perfect,' emphasizing the car's overall class. Commenters like @JFREI appreciated the DB9 GT for its practicality, citing its improved ground clearance and great exhaust note compared to the Vanquish, calling it a significant advancement in design.
Neutral: There were comments that reflected a mix of perspectives on the vehicle, such as @volvo268 who noted that while they weren't fond of the silver color, they acknowledged the interior's appeal. @AtlantaGeordie inquired about the clear film protection on the car, demonstrating an interest in its condition and maintenance. @Ajamjar and @Jimmonte both noted the exclusivity of the DB9 GT, mentioning that only 98 were imported to the US and Canada, which adds a layer of desirability and uniqueness to the vehicle. This aspect of exclusivity was highlighted as a hidden gem worth considering, although @F1Rocket indicated they would continue waiting for a specific color combination.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly by @titleistaddict87, who pointed out a reported vibration at 80 mph from a past service invoice and requested clarification on whether this issue had been diagnosed or resolved. @volvo268 also raised questions about the original tires' age, indicating a concern for the vehicle's maintenance history. This skepticism about certain aspects of the car's condition suggests that while the vehicle has strong appeal, potential buyers may be cautious and seek reassurances regarding its mechanical integrity.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the beauty and investment potential of the vehicle, seeing it as a great option for collectors. @Shawh notes that this model will make a great future investment, while @borneo highlights the legendary status of the Fiat Dino as the product of a collaboration between Fiat and Ferrari. Additionally, @WCDM (The Seller) expressed gratitude for the interest shown in the rare Dino and clarified the car's import status regarding tariffs, reinforcing the appeal of this vehicle for U.S. buyers. Several users, including @Alfa32 and @88anthonyb, praised the car's design and driving experience, which they described as enjoyable and compelling, making it an attractive choice for potential owners.
Neutral: Commenters presented various inquiries and observations, suggesting a desire for more information and clarification about the car. @mike_747 pointed out notable discrepancies in the pricing history, which prompted discussions about the current market conditions. @Calspyder and others expressed confusion about the car's original specifications, particularly concerning its dash and mechanical components, asking for more detailed verification and historical context. The seller responded directly to questions, adding a layer of engagement and transparency that was recognized by various participants in the discussion.
Negative: Concerns regarding the car's condition were raised by several users, suggesting a mix of skepticism and caution among potential buyers. @Calspyder and @happiesttrees indicated issues related to the vehicle's sound while driving, speculating on potential mechanical problems, including noises during operation that could indicate underlying issues. @88anthonyb highlighted the need for more thorough inspection photos, especially in areas prone to rust and damage. Additionally, both these users and others expressed a need for driving videos to assure bidders of the car's performance, thus revealing a hesitance to commit to a purchase without adequate proof of quality.
|
 |
Positive: @Hondair complimented the vehicle as a "Nice NAS!!!" while @Ryangfriedman (The Seller) described the Defender as an "awesome" and "unique build" that runs and drives great, encouraging potential bidders to reach out with any questions. Additionally, @GBRBiLL provided reassuring information about the robustness of the drivetrain, emphasizing that it is a well-designed setup, particularly for a vehicle with a powerful engine swap.
Neutral: @GLHatWFO pointed out that the vehicle is currently listed for $199,995, and @catpat8000 remarked that the LS3 engine swap in a Defender is not uncommon, posing questions about the vehicle's transmission and drivetrain robustness. Some discussion arose around the specifics of the transmission, with @Thatcher expressing confusion about the automatic listing versus the apparent manual gearbox, which @GLHatWFO addressed by referencing a specific photo for clarification.
Negative: Concern was raised by @catpat8000 about the durability of the transmission, transfer case, and differentials given the increased power from the LS3 engine, while @LRC_919 speculated on the type of automatic transmission being used, suggesting it might be a 6l80 automatic with a lokar shifter. @needaclassicasap inquired about the seating arrangement, questioning the lack of a second seat in the back, indicating some uncertainty regarding the vehicle's utility based on its layout.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle reflect a strong admiration for its exclusivity and characteristics. @edbolian highlights the rarity of the Murcielago, providing statistics that enhance its appeal, such as it being 1 of only 316 manual US 6.2L coupes. @PDQue remarks on the car's powerful allure, indicating it gives the feeling of being like Batman, which adds a layer of mystique to its charm. Additionally, discussions about the Pre-LP Murcielago emphasize its connection to traditional Lamborghini aesthetics, with @csmith9 stating it possesses the last true Italian flair, juxtaposing it against newer models that incorporate more Audi design.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions about the technical aspects and maintenance needs of the Murcielago, showing curiosity about its condition and history. For instance, @csmith9 expresses that while front-end accidents might initially raise concerns, the professional rebuilds can assure future owners. @LamboLee is looking for refurbishment services for his own Lamborghini, indicating that the community is proactive about upkeep. @FarqDaddy shares some skepticism regarding the counts on production numbers and notes possible inconsistencies in restoration practices, fostering a sense of due diligence within the community regarding vehicle authenticity and condition.
Negative: On the opposite end of the spectrum, some comments express concern about the vehicle's past accidents and potential quality issues. @mdu911sc notes that the car had its first crash within the first 70 days according to CarFax, which raises a flag for potential buyers. Additionally, @FarqDaddy raises doubts about the vehicle's restoration quality, indicating that the painted calipers might not have been done to a proper standard, suggesting a lack of trust in the vehicle’s cosmetic integrity. This skepticism reflects the importance of meticulous standards within the luxury car market, making transparency a crucial aspect for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle, referred to as the "Stripper," has garnered positive reviews for its classic appeal and enjoyable driving experience. @XAVMECH (The Seller) expressed enthusiasm about working on the car and highlighted its solid performance, describing it as a well-maintained example of a Fox-bodied coupe. Other comments from users such as @rgfulks appreciated the sound of the 5.0 engine and the simplicity of the coupe's design, showcasing a strong nostalgic view of these vehicles.
Neutral: Several commenters have asked for specifics regarding the vehicle's condition, including details about corrosion and paint quality. @abastori inquired about the undercarriage, while @DustinRuhl sought clarification about the vehicle's mileage and speedometer updates. @XAVMECH (The Seller) provided detailed responses, noting that the vehicle had been upgraded with a new 140 MPH speedometer and that it remains mostly original, further emphasizing its collector-worthy status.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, there were some negative comments regarding the car's issues. @66Malibu shared a troublesome experience with a previous vehicle they ordered, hinting at potential delivery mishaps associated with this model, which may concern potential buyers. Additionally, @Galactusz criticized the visibility of a drive-by video, suggesting that the marketing of the vehicle could improve to better showcase its features.
|
2000 Ford F-250 Super Duty Lariat SuperCab Power Stroke 4×4 6-Speed
1FTNX21F8YEB40814
Lot 208806
Dealer
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed great enthusiasm for the 2000 Ford F-250 Super Duty, noting its overall excellent condition and cleanliness. @lunchbocks2002 emphasized how it is not a typical Northeast truck, highlighting the pristine state of the vehicle and its undercarriage, likely due to it being primarily located in Colorado before moving to the Northeast. Commenters also admired the powerful 7.3 million-mile diesel engine paired with the robust 6-speed transmission and 4X4 capabilities, considering it ready for work and a fantastic choice for enthusiasts.
Neutral: Some commenters sought additional information about the vehicle, with @Stryfe requesting specific measurements for a better comparison with their existing truck, while @FerdRanger asked for a blowby video to assess the engine's performance better. These inquiries reflect an interest in the vehicle but do not necessarily indicate an opinion on its quality or state. Additionally, @1600veloce noted the warmth and care provided by his dedicated staff in selling vehicles, expressing their commitment to thoroughly describe the listings with detailed information.
Negative: There were no notable negative comments about the vehicle's condition or features. Comments primarily focused on the impressive aspects of the truck and requests for further technical details. Overall, the feedback was overwhelmingly positive, with no significant criticisms or concerns raised by the commenters.
|
139-Mile 1979 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 10th Anniversary Edition WS6
2X87K9N159279
Lot 208741
Dealer
 |
Positive: @Fartparts comments on the beauty of the vehicle, stating she’s gorgeous and wishing luck to the seller. @69DZ302 expresses excitement about the vehicle's preservation and is curious about the story behind its lack of use. @buybid22, the seller, provides insight into the car's background, mentioning that it was part of a collection of Trans Ams owned by three brothers, emphasizing its rarity with only 40 miles on it, hinting at its excellent condition. @bkrug also praises the car, acknowledging the good story behind its history, which adds to its value.
Neutral: Comments regarding the overall quality of the vehicle highlight its unique condition but also note some imperfections. @Justification points out issues with factory build quality, like a crooked rear spoiler and inconsistent body gaps, which were common in that era. @EvorICE references the decline of traditional American muscle cars in favor of imports, connecting this to the overall discussion about the Trans Am. Meanwhile, @W72Fan discusses the excellent preservation work done to the car, mentioning the engine compartment and undercarriage needs, reflecting ongoing interest in maintaining such vehicles.
Negative: Several users express disappointment about the vehicle not being driven. @JB455 laments that the original owner didn't opt for a manual transmission, suggesting that it may remain underutilized. @uscmanrob shares a desire to see these low-mileage cars used rather than left as museum pieces, as they believe driving is part of the car's charm. @AllMyHeaps humorously questions how a teenager could receive such a gift and not use it, indicating a missed opportunity for enjoyment. @Oldhockyplayr echoes similar sentiments, expressing sadness that the car will likely become a showpiece rather than being enjoyed on the road.
|
 |
Positive: The car has received high praise from commentors for its stunning appearance and overall quality. @cpa713 highlighted it as a southern car with low miles and expressed excitement about its diesel engine. @campodf, the current owner, described the car as gorgeous and mentioned how he searched extensively to find a low-miles diesel version, assuring potential buyers that they would fall in love with it too. Additionally, @genevamotorcars (The Seller) noted the car's excellent specifications, confirming that it is one of the best examples available under 100k miles. The enthusiasm from the community about this specific car indicates it has a solid reputation among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Many commentors sought additional information about the vehicle, showing an interest in specifics. @clemente102 asked about the window sticker and tire details while @jeharn mentioned their research on PCD, indicating that insightful comments from @campodf have been instrumental in learning about the vehicle. @mtea, who shared thoughts on the color combination, referenced a past EGR failure, commenting on its significance given the vehicle's low mileage. These inquiries and insights reflect a blend of interest and active engagement while seeking clarification on the vehicle’s features and condition.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about potential issues with the car. @PopPop62 pointed out significant damage on the underside of the car, questioning whether it was due to mishandling during lifting. @ricofly inquired about the smoke smell and the condition of the headliner, particularly mentioning possible improper installation after maintenance. @campodf addressed these concerns by confirming that there was no smoke smell and attributing the headliner issue to humidity exposure from the vehicle's previous location in Houston. Overall, while there were minor concerns expressed, the responses showed a focus on transparency and reassurance about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Nheinz2005 described the vehicle as a 'sexy beast', while @Trust-in-the-Machine, an experienced photographer, expressed admiration for its stunning color combination and emphasized that the car requires no additional enhancements. He praised the satin PPF finish, stating it complemented the vehicle beautifully. @SNDThomas and @KilroyNo1 mirrored this enthusiasm by appreciating the vehicle's specification and the quality of photos provided by the seller, indicating a well-maintained car in excellent condition.
Neutral: @WLACA noted the car's beautiful specifications and driving performance but advised that prospective buyers shouldn't let small aesthetic issues hinder their enthusiasm for the vehicle. @NHPete inquired about the seemingly excessive GT R badging, while acknowledging that it could easily be removed. The seller, @ronking, responded to comments about the badges and reassured potential buyers that they can be removed without damaging the paint, showcasing responsiveness to inquiries.
Negative: Conversely, comments from @MRM highlighted concerns over the vehicle's additional GT-R badging, suggesting that it detracts from the car's aesthetics. @Surge echoed similar sentiments, wishing for updates to the interior design, specifically referencing the 2018-2019 model features. @s28hero raised practical concerns about driving the car in urban environments due to its low profile and lack of a front axle lift, although @ronking addressed this by sharing his own positive experiences when navigating such challenges.
|
 |
Positive: @Lengrep praised the 16-valve M42 engine, noting it was underappreciated and far superior to the older 8-valve model it replaced in the E30 lineup. @andrewlee67 (The Seller) mentioned that the engine and 5-speed transmission are what initially attracted him to the vehicle, describing it as fun to drive and mechanically sound, despite its mileage. He confirmed that the air conditioning is functional and effectively cools the interior, and he believes the car has spent most of its life in garages, thereby showing no significant rust and only minor signs of age in the paint which can be improved with waxing.
Neutral: @OttoBob reminisced about his own experience with E30s, sharing how he owned a 1992 318i convertible that was totaled, and inquired about the history of the profile gasket repair. @Trigger9449 and @vonkamp both asked about potential rust spots and the functionality of the air conditioning, indicating they were aware of common issues but wanted to understand the condition specifics. @claysclassiccars asked about the car's reliability as a daily driver for shorter commutes, reflecting concern for its practicality in everyday use.
Negative: Several comments indicate concerns about the vehicle's history. @calisomb questioned why the hardtop, previously part of the vehicle on the last BAT sale, was not included when purchased by @andrewlee67 (The Seller). This raised suspicion about potential missing components from the car's past. @andrewlee67 (The Seller) admitted that the hardtop was not included in his purchase, which some may interpret as a lack of transparency in the vehicle's sale history.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reveal a strong appreciation for the 2000 Audi TT Quattro, with several users expressing admiration for its design and performance. @mid60soldsfan highlighted the car as a "bucket list car" with a great color combination, reminiscent of historical Auto Union racers, also praising the dashboard as a work of art. Additionally, @steveb8699 described it as a nice-looking vehicle, indicating a positive aesthetic impression, while the seller, Collectibleclassics, provided assurance about the air conditioning functionality, which was confirmed to be in working order.
Neutral: Several comments addressed questions about the vehicle's features and historical context, contributing to a helpful dialogue about the Audi TT's attributes. @tff provided details about the specific model's horsepower and exhaust design, while @LarryZ103 inquired about the presence of a CD player. The seller, Collectibleclassics, confirmed that the car does include the CD unit and invited potential buyers to reach out for further inquiries, suggesting an actively engaging approach to customer service.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition were raised as well, with @steveb8699 asking about previous damage recorded in a Carfax report and the potential for rust near the driver's side front wheel well. Similarly, @BIZTEC sought additional information on the driver's side wheel well issue and requested close-up photos to identify any hidden problems. These queries indicate that while the car appeals aesthetically, potential buyers are understandably cautious about its past and current condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting it as a unique find and a crowd pleaser. @carfan1978 noted that it deviates from the typical low-mile classics but remains appealing, while @Redbird41 proclaimed it a nice ride, indicating their attention to it despite it being different from the seller's usual offerings. Additionally, @Millertime1977 shared admiration for the Bronco's well-maintained condition and mentioned the strong aftermarket support for such vehicles, further validating its desirability. @Molae65 echoed this sentiment, citing his personal experience with a similar model that has proven to be reliable with proper care.
Neutral: The seller, @Competitioncars, is actively engaging with potential bidders, providing detailed updates and promising various demonstration videos of the vehicle's features. They addressed inquiries regarding the vehicle's mileage, specifically clarifying a clerical error reported on Carfax, which some bidders questioned. @Talega0321 and @Gjc091376 brought up concerns about the car's functionality and odometer discrepancies, to which the seller responded with reassurance about the vehicle's working condition and a commitment to provide transparency about its mileage history.
Negative: However, there are some concerns raised regarding the odometer discrepancies, with @Ford512 arguing that the mileage history seems questionable given the multiple reported figures. He posits that the odometer may have been tampered with, which cast doubt on the seller's reassurances. Additionally, @Gjc091376 pressed for clarity on the potential issues surrounding the mileage claims, indicating that the uncertainty may impact buyer confidence. Overall, while the vehicle has garnered attention and interest, the questions about its mileage and maintenance history may pose challenges for the seller.
|
 |
Positive: @GregDantas (The Seller) describes the 2007 Parnelli Jones Saleen as a fantastic car, rating it a 9/10 and noting that it's built with direct involvement from Parnelli Jones himself, which adds to its collector appeal. @WifeSaysNoMore praises it as one of the best driving cars they own, indicating that the winning bidder will not be disappointed. The car's features, such as the 180 mph speedometer, power-adjusting leather seats, and the limited production of only 500 units, contribute to its desirability among collectors like @joecross, who expresses enthusiasm for both this model and the 2012 Boss in their possession.
Neutral: Many comments pertain to specific details about the vehicle's components, as @FEFrancoD inquires about the engine's specifications. @KarKenKens and @1CLN93 ask about the availability of the original accessories such as tire inflators and car covers, indicating interest in maintaining the car's authenticity. Additionally, @GregDantas (The Seller) responded to inquiries, confirming the presence of aftermarket items and proudly shared plans to provide the original window sticker and letter of authenticity with the car.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the vehicle's condition and completeness, with @1CLN93 specifically asking about original parts and the state of the tires. Questions about the trunk courtesy light and the mat's condition hint at potential issues not immediately observable in the listing. @Wjhpc brings up a practical concern on the performance of the AC during hot summer days, though @GregDantas reassures that it performed well even in 90-degree weather.
|
 |
Positive: @liambsullivan (The Seller) describes the 1978 Honda Z50A as a piece of true motorcycling history that is rarely available in such excellent condition. @TheCarchitect expresses admiration, stating it's very rare to find one in such good shape and well documented, clearly indicating it has been well cared-for. This classic motorcycle has garnered interest, with @TheCarchitect wishing to add it to their own collection, highlighting its desirability as a collector's item.
Neutral: @liambsullivan (The Seller) invites potential buyers to ask questions and expresses gratitude for the opening bid, indicating an open line of communication. The seller mentions their pride in the bike, suggesting a personal connection to the vehicle. Comments reflect a general appreciation for the motorcycle’s background and condition without specific details.
Negative: There are no negative comments or criticisms about the vehicle. The overall sentiment is positive, with no detractors expressing discontent or concerns regarding the motorcycle's condition or value.
|
 |
Positive: @Shaank94 (The Seller) expresses excitement about offering the meticulously cared-for 4th gen 4Runner, noting that it has been maintained consistently by its original owner who used OEM parts and documented all services. @Spider_Mike highlights the vehicle's rugged construction that offers great longevity, making it a suitable choice for both off-roading and highway driving. @Cendrick shares a personal experience owning a similar vehicle, emphasizing its reliability and durability, which adds to the positive reputation surrounding the 4Runner.
Neutral: Several comments discuss specific aspects of the vehicle, such as its maintenance history and tire conditions. @WIZZZZ inquires about the oil change history and service records, to which @Cendrick responds that maintenance seems well-documented in the owner's notebook. @Shaank94 (The Seller) confirms that while the previous owner handled the maintenance themselves, he has also recently performed additional work on the vehicle. Additionally, @Wintrop asks about the age and mileage of the tires, receiving confirmation from @Shaank94 (The Seller) that they are about five years old with around 7-8k miles.
Negative: Opinions about the vehicle are generally positive; however, there are a few inquiries that express some concerns. @WIZZZZ's questions about the timing belt versus chain and detailed service history indicate a cautious interest in potential maintenance issues. The request for more detailed shop records highlights the common apprehension buyers have about verifying the maintenance claims made by sellers. Overall, while there are some concerns raised, they are balanced by the largely favorable remarks about the vehicle's condition and reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters shared their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning condition and timeless design. @Member_12590 noted its impeccable finish, while @jackmjason described it as breathtakingly superb. @Kstadelman reminisced about his own experience with a similar Norton, emphasizing the excitement and adventure associated with riding such a classic bike, showcasing its appeal to both nostalgia and contemporary enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several users had practical inquiries and observations regarding the vehicle's specifications and features. For instance, @cadalac33 asked about the ignition type, to which @Bear1lab confirmed it has electronic ignition made by Pazon. Additionally, some commenters acknowledged the absence of certain Dunstall accessories, such as the unique exhaust, indicating that it's important for buyers to understand what they're getting before bidding.
Negative: However, not all feedback was entirely positive. @Vin51 raised concerns about the bike's mechanical condition given that it hasn't been ridden since its restoration nine years ago. Moreover, @NCR600TT criticized the listing title for not accurately reflecting the Dunstall branding, suggesting that it undermines the bike's value and uniqueness. Comments like these suggest potential buyers should be aware of both the motorcycle's strengths and its possible shortcomings before making a decision.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlight the intriguing aspects of the vehicle. @jtvap expressed an interest in seeing a driving video and cold start, indicating a desire to observe the vehicle’s performance and condition. This reflects a curiosity about the quality and functionality of a car that has not been driven for a long time, suggesting that potential buyers value transparency and want reassurance about its operational status.
Neutral: Comments such as those from @neverenoughgold raise practical questions regarding the vehicle's inclusions. The inquiry about whether the original Ford radio is included indicates that buyers are considering both the historical and functional aspects of the vehicle. Additionally, @news980 (The Seller) provides information, which is vital for potential buyers looking to know more about what comes with the purchase.
Negative: There is a notable concern regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly due to the comment by @NVGT350 that states it hasn't been driven in over a decade. This lack of use could imply various potential issues, raising doubts about the state of parts, engine, and overall reliability. Such comments may deter some buyers who might be wary of the implications of a long period of inactivity.
|
 |
Positive: @johnnyvett commented positively on the Corvette's aesthetic, appreciating its classic color combination for a 1979 model, wishing the owner good luck with the sale. @ronsant noted that he found the vehicle visually appealing and shared a curiosity about its performance, while @CarFoolLane praised the color combination as a tribute to the original 1953 Corvettes and acknowledged the car's well-equipped features and condition, remarking that it has a lot of positives overall. Additionally, @southernr expressed love for the color combination and @sleepchamber found the overall look of the car impressive, referring to it as 'awesome.'
Neutral: Several comments addressed specifics about the vehicle rather than expressing strong opinions. @Sniderdb (The Seller) conveyed that a 1979 Corvette is not typically known for fast acceleration, followed by responses to questions regarding the condition of the paint and various vehicle components. The seller confirmed the presence of factory overspray and runs on the paint, while also sharing details about the car's service history, which included evidence of its original parts, like the floor mats. @PopPop62 inquired about factory finishes, and @Bada55 affirmed the comments on common factory issues with paint and seals, maintaining a neutral tone throughout the discussion.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about the vehicle, particularly regarding its maintenance and modifications. @sleepchamber questioned why the seats had been recovered despite low mileage, leading @Sniderdb (The Seller) to explain the minor tear issue that prompted the upgrade. Additionally, @Carnahanzz raised questions about potential replacements in calipers, the presence of an aluminum radiator, and whether the paint was original or a repaint, signaling a level of skepticism about the overall originality and condition of the Corvette. @Streetcoupe commented on the front clip potentially being replaced, adding to the uncertainty around the car's history.
|
 |
Positive: A number of comments reflect positively on the vehicle, particularly its status as an original and honest 'survivor'. @cormaro, the seller, emphasizes that the F250 is in good condition with the original paint, having been mostly used for recreational purposes with fewer than 4000 miles added since it was purchased. @cormaro also notes that the truck runs well, has good oil pressure, and exhibits no unusual noises or smoke from the exhaust, adding to its appeal as a solid option for buyers considering a classic vehicle. @Kirkm1976 also acknowledges the truck's honest condition and expresses appreciation for its qualities, labeling it as a very nice find.
Neutral: Comments about the truck also include neutral observations regarding the seller's disclosure of its current issues. @cormaro mentions the existence of a reserve on the bid, indicating that it’s a low reserve and presenting it as a worthwhile opportunity despite the required repairs due to a head gasket issue. The seller references the amount spent on parts and maintains that the engine still holds a lot of life, suggesting potential buyers could see value in its durability, even with the noted mechanical problems.
Negative: There are clear concerns raised in the comments regarding the truck's mechanical state. @Kirkm1976 directly questions the condition of the coolant, suggesting it resembles a 'chocolate milkshake', which is an indicator of serious issues within the engine. @cormaro confirms this issue but reassures that all coolant has been drained and fresh oil has been added. However, it is mentioned that driving the truck should be limited due to overheating risks, which indicates caution is needed from potential buyers about the functionality of the vehicle, despite its otherwise appealing attributes.
|
 |
Positive: @Blu3Wagon expressed excitement about the vehicle, noting that it is a good-looking truck and may serve as a great replacement for their E70. They appreciated the ease of the buying process on BAT, indicating a positive first experience. @Speedygirl26 also showcased enthusiasm, being local and requesting to view the car before the auction ends, suggesting that there is interest in the vehicle.
Neutral: @dslaven inquired about the details of the accidents and repair work done on the vehicle, indicating a desire for more information but without expressing either positive or negative feelings. They also asked for clarification regarding the specific damage locations and showed intent to view the car soon, suggesting a neutral assessment while gathering more information. @Bturbo (The Seller) provided responses to these queries, including confirmation of the vehicle's damage on the driver's side and offering opportunities for local viewings.
Negative: There were no explicitly negative comments about the vehicle. However, @dslaven's questions regarding the vehicle's accident history may imply concern about its past condition, which could be perceived as negatively impacting the vehicle's value or reliability. Overall, the feedback has remained more focused on inquiries rather than outright negative sentiments.
|
 |
Positive: @Noisyboyz appreciates the 3LT package for its ability to color coordinate the interior, particularly noting how a Red Mist car brightens the entire interior. @BigFrank comments on the overall value of the vehicle, stating that regardless of the options, these cars remain great for the money and are underappreciated. @BigFrank also points out that the absence of certain features may attract buyers looking for enjoyment rather than investment, highlighting the car's driving experience.
Neutral: @MB54 asks for more details regarding the "wear on seats" comment, particularly photos of the affected areas. @Yags mentions their mixed feelings about the unusual build, noting the combination of silver with the interior color does not appeal to them, and they express disappointment in missing features like the ZR1 and front lift. @C8CORVETTEGREG notes that the tan interior does not match well with the gray exterior, indicating a personal preference that differs from the seller's offering.
Negative: @Noisyboyz shares their disappointment with the delivery condition of their previous vehicle, as the front seat appeared dirty despite having only 4 miles on its odometer. This leads to concerns about quality and presentation in the used car market. Additionally, @59soldus23 remarks on the lack of the front axle lift as a significant preference, which may deter potential buyers who prioritize this feature.
|
 |
Positive: @HB92647 appreciates the aesthetic of the Mercedes, specifically mentioning the quality detail of the Coco mats, and expresses admiration for the overall design. @KdeF recalls a nostalgic affection for the car's classic lines and considers it beautiful. @Cdevine33 offers good wishes for the seller’s future move to France and expresses excitement about the potential for finding more classic vehicles there, while @CoronadoSun remarks on the significant effort and investment into the vehicle, recognizing it as a labor of love.
Neutral: @mrsnak (The Seller) provides informative responses to potential buyers' inquiries, assuring them that the vehicle runs smoothly and has very little smoke. There have been concerns addressed about the oil pressure gauge, which was bypassed, but overall the car is described as a solid cruiser suitable for the freeway. Comments from @perry911113 and @bassid support @Hackberry's sentiments about the vehicle's performance, noting it can be enjoyable to drive despite limitations, and there are reasons some prefer a manual transmission for better control.
Negative: @JimK raises concerns about the vehicle's 67 horsepower and the potential for causing traffic issues, while @Hackberry criticizes recurrent negative comments regarding the car's acceleration. Furthermore, @JimKou queries the functionality of the oil pressure gauge and the condition of various components, suggesting a general unease about reliability. @Klisan also questions whether past accidents affected the vehicle's structure, indicative of a broader concern about its condition.
|
 |
Positive: @campodf thinks the vehicle is impressive, referring to it as 'THE BEAST!' which conveys a sense of admiration. @genevamotorcars, the seller, notes that the vehicle drives 'fantastic' and even better than stock, expressing surprise at how little it rubs despite the full lock scenario. @Dheffel1 complements the dealer's expertise on diesel engines, suggesting that the seller is well-informed about common issues, which adds credibility to the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding specific vehicle features such as the cargo cover from @flyfaster and towing capabilities by @WAZFAN19. @whitey poses a question about the difference in tire sizes and their impact, indicating he's seeking more technical understanding but doesn't make any value judgment. Additionally, @smartalek asks about major services performed, showing an interest in the maintenance history without expressing any particular positive or negative opinion.
Negative: Comments from @AAUCTION express a mix of nostalgia and skepticism about the vehicle's past issues with a previous Q7, which may cast a shadow over his views on reliability. He discusses concerns about oil changes based on information he received from a mechanic, suggesting a lack of confidence in the vehicle's upkeep. @Dheffel1 disputes some of @AAUCTION's claims about warranty voids, suggesting a disagreement that could indicate some level of mistrust in the information shared about engine maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: @Britishclassic (The Seller) has expressed confidence in the quality and condition of the vehicle, emphasizing its history as an original owner car that has been well maintained. They have noted that the car drives well, passes inspections, and receives compliments for its color and interior. @Britishclassic also reassured potential buyers about the reliability of the vehicle, mentioning successful long trips without any issues and the performance of the transmission after servicing. Additionally, the car features a clean body without major rust issues, though it does have minor quirks like a brake light sensor that needs fixing, which the seller is addressing.
Neutral: Comments from users like @HeavyTank77 and @SWasinger94 focus on the mixed experiences with similar models, particularly regarding potential faults and maintenance peculiarities of the LR3. @HeavyTank77 advises prospective buyers to inquire about the vehicle's health and previous fault codes while sharing personal anecdotes about typical issues such as air suspension failures. There seems to be a general acknowledgment that the vehicle can be a good purchase if the buyer is well-informed about its maintenance and potential quirks. Furthermore, @ArmyPAC inquired about service records, reflecting a standard concern for long-term reliability beyond initial impressions.
Negative: On the more critical side, comments from users like @ColinDowd reflect skepticism about the longevity and reliability of the vehicle, suggesting that it may be better to part it out due to common issues. @HeavyTank77 also emphasizes this caution by mentioning the presence of fault codes that might arise and detailing possible recurring problems that could affect newer owners. This indicates an underlying concern within the community about the LR3’s long-term reliability, suggesting that while some find the vehicle charming, others have had troubling experiences that could deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Nickv09 praises the vehicle's sweet patina, while @MarkNeely enthusiastically states it is "Bad to the bone!" and calls for a spirited drive video, indicating strong interest. @ktm_rick also encourages a drive video, emphasizing the excitement of a tire smoke launch. @jsa310 expresses a patriotic sentiment with "So much ‘Merica I can’t stand it!", and @evansw46 showcases their appreciation for the impressive rolling burnout, calling it cool. @mduel86 and @lowandslow12 agree on the truck's appeal, with @mduel86 declaring it a "bad ass truck" and @lowandslow12 wanting to watch the burnout on loop. @Pettyfan43 compliments the stance and wheel combination and talks about the difficulty of finding modern wheels that suit older trucks, wishing the seller good luck in the sale.
Neutral: Several comments focus on technical aspects and inquiries about the vehicle. @gulickjm asks if the truck has A/C and whether there is a clear coat over the patina, indicating interest in its build quality. @Roostinyfz poses multiple questions about the vehicle's specifications, including whether it has a hoonigan handle, the possibility of running on pump gas, and requests for various videos documenting the truck's performance. @TVETTE expresses curiosity about the condition of the rear tires and whether the patina is original or recreated.
Negative: Some comments highlight concerns regarding the vehicle. @dcitron questions the absence of A/C, hinting at a comfort issue, while @Roostinyfz, inquiring about running on 91 octane, raises doubts about the vehicle's fuel compatibility in certain regions. Additionally, @TVETTE's comment about needing new rear tires soon suggests potential performance and maintenance worries. Furthermore, @Rfox599 (The Seller) clarifies that the tires are at 50% and the patina is actually faux, which may disappoint some who value originality.
|
 |
Positive: @thunderchicken expresses excitement about the vehicle, calling it 'cool'. @Ibsjb finds the bike very nice and is curious about its maintenance needs, to which @SpecialeMotors (The Seller) confidently assures that there are no issues and it's ready to ride. Additionally, @Huginn compliments the bike's beauty, and @Hondair appreciates its interest even from overseas, highlighting the low mileage and wishing the seller good luck with the listing.
Neutral: @Mouse51 raises questions about the bike's design and functionality, wondering about the movement of the rear fender and potential storage behind the sidecar seat, receiving informative responses from @SpecialeMotors (The Seller). @Monyca1228 asks if temporary storage while transportation is arranged would be possible, which @SpecialeMotors confirms will not be an issue. The vehicle's description includes mention of its original condition, the low mileage of 3,400, and recent service making it ready to ride.
Negative: @berfinroy expresses skepticism about Kawasaki's motives, arguing that despite the bike being a tribute, it bears too many similarities to classic Indian designs, which could detract from its authenticity. The discussion continues with @Bartleby8 defending the bike as a creative tribute rather than a clone, suggesting that contemporary opinions of it as such stem from the revival of the Indian brand after its decline. Both commentators share concerns about the implications of brand authenticity and tribute designs, indicating a divide in how the bike is perceived.
|
 |
Positive: @xxdigiovannixx praised the vehicle, describing it as a good-looking Falcon Ranchero and mentioning he has a similar model. @FalconFlyer admired the two-tone interior and color combination, expressing his love for the design. @bosshoss3406pack remarked on its beauty, suggesting it looks like it should be featured in a Ford dealer's brochure. @Jms83604 also referred to the vehicle positively, calling it a beauty and expressing excitement over its local availability.
Neutral: @Essco1503 (The Seller) responded to the positive comments, noting that the car attracts a lot of attention and has people asking about it. They mentioned the absence of the data plate due to repainting, but provided the VIN, even though it appeared dark in the image. @Falconer1024 asked about the vehicle's classification for import tariffs, which @Essco1503 confirmed as a truck per US classification, further explaining its origins, hinting at its Canadian roots.
Negative: Some comments did express concerns or questions, such as @Ranchero65 inquiring about the lack of a data plate picture. @Essco1503 (The Seller) acknowledged this concern, explaining that the plate was likely lost during repainting. Additionally, @Falconer1024 raised questions regarding import classifications and the impact of having no plate, demonstrating a knowledgeable but cautious engagement with the auction's details.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received praise for its stunning appearance and careful maintenance, highlighting the attractive color combinations and the impeccable presentation prior to sale. @GDogg remarks on its beauty, while @car-collector describes it as "absolutely stunning." Furthermore, @FXRcR1 notes the excellent cleaning job which reflects positively on the seller’s commitment to presentation. Customers appreciate the unique "Yacht" specification as being more tasteful compared to standard offerings, affirming its appeal in the luxury vehicle market. Comments from @ULG1 (The Seller) also reassure potential buyers about the car's strong performance and excellent maintenance history.
Neutral: @ULG1 (The Seller) provides detailed responses regarding the vehicle's warranty, which offers potential buyers confidence. The extended warranty in place until October 2027 includes an explanation of how it was obtained, assuaging concerns from buyers like @clean_machina who requested further details on the warranty's transferability. The seller confirms that all service records since the car's purchase are available and were maintained at a certified dealer, therefore aligning with a standard expectation of luxury vehicle care.
Negative: Some comments express concerns regarding the warranty documentation, with @E55 questioning conflicting expiration dates on the warranty pages. This raises potential red flags regarding the clarity and reliability of the warranty information provided. Questions from users like @clean_machina showcase skepticism on how certain aspects of the warranty may not align with standard norms, which could deter potential buyers seeking transparency. Despite the seller’s reassurances, these concerns highlight the need for clear documentation and explanation around extended warranties, particularly in high-end car transactions.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle, a 2000 model year kei truck, comes with proper documentation and has a clean Maryland title, which should facilitate registration in most states. This aspect assures potential buyers, especially those outside Maryland, that they can avoid significant issues during the registration process, making it a more appealing option for them.
Neutral: @CBDiem raised questions regarding the classification of the 2020 model year, specifically asking if there are month classifications or the possibility of delaying the registration to 2026. The inquiries reflect a genuine interest in understanding the vehicle's classification and how it affects potential ownership.
Negative: However, @TokyoMotorsDC (The Seller) highlighted a significant concern for Maryland residents regarding the new historic tag laws. The regulation states that only vehicles from 1999 and earlier can qualify for historic tags, restricting newer kei trucks like this one for certain uses within Maryland. Buyers in this state must be aware that they can only purchase the vehicle for use on private property or need to register it out of state.
|
 |
Positive: @BaT expressed appreciation for the vehicle, remarking that it is a "terrific ELDO" and praising the yellow leather interior, comparing it favorably to a family member's 1976 model. The seller, @autosales, confirmed that the vehicle is in great condition, runs well, and has been well maintained, reinforcing the positive sentiments about its overall state.
Neutral: @RickFisher pointed out that the description of the interior color as "buckskin" is inaccurate, as Cadillac referred to it as "Yellow" for that model year. @BaT acknowledged this comment and mentioned that the listing had been updated accordingly. @AFS raised some questions regarding potential issues with the car's driving performance and the condition of the bumper fillers, indicating a desire for more information without expressing a definitive opinion.
Negative: @AFS expressed concern with a direct question about the vehicle, asking if there are any issues with how it drives and whether the bumper fillers need replacement, suggesting some skepticism about the vehicle's maintenance despite the seller's assurances.
|
 |
Positive: @JPTURBO (The Seller) described the bike as a great running and diving machine, showcasing a clean and original appearance that reflects its low mileage of 9900 miles. @ccimino shared his extensive experience with the K1200LT, highlighting how it is an excellent mile-eater that performs well on both one-up and two-up rides. He also praised the bike's extraordinary stability and aerodynamics, alongside its convenient adjustable windshield, making it versatile for various weather conditions. Overall, the positive comments emphasize the bike's impressive rideability, comfort, and overall performance as a touring motorcycle.
Neutral: @singlespeed inquired about heated seats, clarifying a common feature that some may expect in touring bikes. @SDCR mentioned that this model is one of the heaviest BMW motorbikes, yet it is noted for its long-distance travel suitability. The discussion also touched on the bike's weight and maneuverability, with @ccimino noting the manual centerstand preference while praising its ease of handling despite its heft. Several comments sought clarity on the braking system, with questions about the type of brake lines used and whether upgrades had been made.
Negative: @ccimino cautioned that while the K1200LT is a great motorcycle, understanding its weight is essential, especially for newer riders. @ottomobile99 pointed out how the bike can become cumbersome, especially for older riders, advising newcomers to be cautious about turning the front wheel when starting from a stop. @Prestaged and @Hilliss raised concerns about whether the bike's brake lines had been updated, suggesting that the original rubber hoses may still be in place despite the listing's claims, which could impact performance and safety.
|
 |
Positive: @dividebyzero mentions that the vehicle reminds him of a car you could smash in video games, pointing to its classic appeal. @carstruck highlights that with 200,000 miles, the vehicle is 'barely broken in', suggesting durability. @mike0609 compliments the interior condition, noting it has held up well after almost 30 years. @cmac55blkhd gives kudos to previous owners for maintaining such an amazing condition for the mileage, while @gmp9195 praises the car's rarity and highlights the important service history.
Neutral: @nexusautobrokers (The Seller) provides detailed responses about the car's history and features, confirming that the timing belt status is uncertain but offers transparency about the transmission replacement. The seller shares that there are over 71 service records and expresses enthusiasm about the vehicle's appeal, as well as options for shipping at reasonable prices. Several commentators, including @Rebele92 and @Benjim34 ask clarifying questions about the car's features and maintenance history, demonstrating interest but also a need for further assurance.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised by @gmp9195 about the reason behind the transmission replacement in 2023, while @Benjim34 flags the uncertainty regarding the timing belt's status and questions potential leaks or suspension issues. @sixnet expresses impatience in waiting for a cold start video, hinting at a lack of sufficient visual proof of the vehicle's condition from the seller. Additionally, @mike0609 seeks clarification on door dents mentioned in the description, possibly indicating a lack of thorough transparency in the listing.
|
 |
Positive: Several users have praised the vehicle's robust capabilities and utility, particularly highlighting its design for work. For instance, @bosshoss3406pack mentioned that it would be perfect for ranch jobs, while @sfsv called it the ultimate work truck, citing the benefits of the gas-powered 6.8-liter V10 engine over diesel options. Commenters appreciated the practicality of the truck, noting features like the Western Mule crane and the extensive tool body, which add to its utility. Seller @William_Mo emphasized the truck's manual transmission and powerful drivetrain, inviting further inquiries about specifications and features.
Neutral: Commenters discussed the specifications of the vehicle, with @Vonder seeking clarification on the utility body manufacturer, to which @William_Mo confirmed it as a PHENIX Enterprise. Additionally, the seller provided detailed dimensions of the bed and reiterated the truck's powerful drivetrain, noting the manual transmission and its capabilities. This information catered to those interested in precise details regarding the truck's suitability for various tasks.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments about the vehicle, but @shrackracing expressed a concern regarding Ford's discontinuation of manual transmissions in larger trucks, hinting at nostalgia for a bygone era of manual driving. However, this comment did not deter overall appreciation for the truck's features and performance, suggesting that the sentiments were more about personal preference than criticism of the specific vehicle being discussed.
|
30-Years-Owned 1989 Chevrolet K1500 Cheyenne 4×4 Sportside 5-Speed
1GCDK14Z7KZ147831
Lot 208805
Private Party
 |
Positive: @bddietter45, the seller, shared that this '89 Chevy stepside Cheyenne is a highly-desired and attention-grabbing truck that has been meticulously restored over the past couple of years. Owners appreciate its stunning paint job, which features multiple coats of metallic gray graphite that enhance its overall appearance. The truck has been garage-kept for many years, and the seller has pride in stating that it draws frequent compliments as looking almost brand new. A satisfying restoration process included replacing many parts to maintain quality and aesthetics, contributing to the vehicle's distinct originality and charm, making it an exciting option for potential buyers.
Neutral: @Mikerees1 asked about the mileage since the engine replacement, to which @bddietter45 provided an update confirming that it has accumulated about 32,000 miles since the replacement, now totaling around 141,000 miles. The seller clarified some functional aspects of the truck, such as the operation of the 4WD, which they noted works perfectly, and addressed inquiries about the headliner fitment, indicating some challenges with adhesive but affirming it remains functional. Additionally, @jerseymayhem raised questions about emissions compliance, and the seller confirmed that emissions components were untouched and that the truck had passed emissions tests while in California.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding specific aspects of the truck's restoration and parts. @Wheelwizard1 queried the condition of the 4WD and mentioned the clutch, while @YennaM questioned the choice of the engine, expressing curiosity about the absence of a V8 despite the truck's attractive appearance. @bddeitter45 responded that the original engine was retained and that they were satisfied with its performance, but some potential buyers might hesitate due to the engine choice or the aftermarket headliner installation issues that were encountered. Overall, while there are minor concerns, the seller has confidence in the truck's functionality and character.
|
 |
Positive: Manywheels59 praised the DT400 as the 'King of the 2 stroke DTs', suggesting it’s a highly regarded bike. @mrhemi426 shared nostalgia about getting a 1976 model new from Ruttman Yamaha, remarking on its originality and quality, indicating it’s a well-preserved survivor. @SoCal250 confirmed the bike's model year as 1976, providing technical details about the VIN that affirm the model's designation, also complimenting the bike's appearance.
Neutral: @ArtCartBart (The Seller) expressed gratitude for the input on the model year, noting the confusion caused by differing information from BAT regarding the VIN. @dzguy and @thatsakillerpiece contributed additional verification for the year, citing multiple resources that affirm the 1976 model status based on the VIN. The Seller mentioned balancing the information received and managing the auction listing based on varying opinions.
Negative: @mrhemi426 raised a concern about the kick starter, indicating that it had been bent and likely altered, questioning the reasoning behind such modifications. The Seller responded that they were unsure why it was altered, hypothesizing it might have been adjusted for rider comfort. This alteration potentially detracts from the bike's overall originality, which the Seller values highly.
|
 |
Positive: @4WHEEL_GERMAN provided some helpful videos of the vehicle, demonstrating its features and capabilities. This can serve as a valuable resource for potential buyers looking to understand the vehicle better before making a purchase decision.
Neutral: @TABL3SIX inquired about the availability of the window sticker, showing interest in the vehicle's specifications and original details. @4WHEEL_GERMAN confirmed that there was no window sticker received from the previous owner, indicating some limitations in available documentation.
Negative: @TABL3SIX expressed disappointment regarding the absence of a build order or window sticker for the vehicle. The lack of these documents may raise concerns for potential buyers about transparency and the vehicle's history.
|
 |
Positive: @r6erik expressed enthusiasm about the no reserve auction, indicating a sense of urgency and excitement. @Cjmurano noted the vehicle's low mileage, suggesting it could be a potential daily driver, which is a positive aspect for buyers looking for both performance and practicality. @Coppertopped shared an appreciation for the car's specifications, highlighting that it could serve as either a thrilling drive or a solid starting point for a high-end build, showcasing the vehicle's versatility and appeal to different types of enthusiasts. @jjeremyw04 described it as a great looking car, adding to the positive commentary about its aesthetic appeal and potential resale value.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific details regarding the vehicle, particularly concerning the roll cage's mounting and performance aspects. @phantomapollyon asked for pictures of the roll cage mount points, while @lebrio requested clarity on how the roll cage is mounted. These questions reveal a general curiosity about the car's features and specifications, highlighting that potential buyers are taking a close look at important modifications. @evil_gtr and @grkmf3 showed interest in the auction dynamics, suggesting energy around the bidding process without expressing strong opinions, simply observing the activity with humor.
Negative: However, there were concerns raised regarding the vehicle's condition and market value. @everyhappyday pointed out that while the car is unique due to its low mileage, many components are now outdated and might require replacements. There was a sentiment from @homie3186 regarding potential bidder errors in the auction, indicating uncertainty in the bidding process. @bringatrailer clarified that a bid had been removed as it was considered erroneous, suggesting potential confusion among bidders. @everyhappyday also remarked that the car might be overpriced given the necessary work, reflecting a critical view on its current valuation in the market.
|
 |
Positive: @gscharnagl describes the vehicle as a beauty with a relatively rare specification, suggesting it has desirable features. @TurboJ appreciates the great color and mileage, implying that the vehicle offers an enjoyable experience, particularly with the M113K engine. @Baddogdesmo highlights the absence of wood grain plastic as a positive attribute, indicating a preference for the vehicle's aesthetic and design without embellishments.
Neutral: @4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) mentions that videos of the vehicle will be posted after Labor Day weekend, showing a commitment to transparency with potential buyers. @Andrei29 requests specific videos to assess the vehicle's condition, such as operation of the top and a cold start, along with inquiries about the tires and long-distance travel capability, indicating potential concerns that need to be addressed.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's history are raised by both @gscharnagl and @georgepehanick, as they note the seven previous owners, particularly one who did not drive it for five years, which prompts apprehension regarding the vehicle's reliability. @TurboJ hints at a lack of investigative enthusiasm among some commenters regarding why the car sat, implying that there may be underlying issues or a lack of due diligence in understanding its history.
|
 |
Positive: The 2004 BMW 330Ci ZHP Convertible 6-Speed is highly praised for its exceptional condition and meticulous care. @dannyluce63 highlights that the vehicle was garage-kept since its import from Canada, which has preserved its original paint, trim, and badging. The car’s body is described as straight, with a beautiful paint finish that shows very little wear, attesting to the care it has received. Additionally, the mileage reported is verified to be accurate, as @Rjg71713 explains that the odometer was coded to read in miles rather than kilometers upon registration in Florida. Overall, the vehicle runs and drives perfectly with all features in working condition, leading to a positive impression of its reliability and overall quality.
Neutral: Several commenters express curiosity about the vehicle’s history and compliance with performance specifications. @gcholls1 questions how the mileage has fluctuated between 100k to 65k, prompting explanations about the odometer and its reporting system. There are inquiries regarding the vehicle's performance package classification, with @T5ing and @Basecoplan discussing whether it truly qualifies as a ZHP based on limited visibility of performance codes. @dannyluce63 shares extensive information about the distinction between the ZHP and its Canadian counterpart, ZAM, attempting to address these concerns and clarify the specific details about the car’s options and specifications.
Negative: Some comments reveal skepticism concerning the car's authenticity and history, particularly regarding the performance package. @T5ing expresses doubt about the vehicle being a true ZHP due to discrepancies in the redline and performance codes, while @Basecoplan reinforces this by noting a lack of the S767 code crucial for identifying ZHP models. Furthermore, concerns are raised about potential clerical errors in the car's mileage history, as seen through @OldDominionB’s inquiry about reported inconsistencies on CARFAX. @Rjg71713 admits to being unaware of these inconsistencies until reviewing the CARFAX report, indicating a need for further clarification to resolve these concerns about the vehicle's condition and history.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments reflect a deep nostalgia for the Ford Escort GT, with several users sharing fond memories of their experiences with similar cars from the '90s. Commentors like @withdrew and @JoeSho reminisced about the joy of driving these vehicles, noting their reliability, performance, and the fun they had in them during their younger years. The excitement is palpable, especially for @The_Dude_Abides, who finds the listing as interesting as any supercar today. @Johnny1eye expressed how much he loves the car and is eager to watch the auction unfold, highlighting the memories it brings back.
Neutral: Some comments focus on practical inquiries about the vehicle's condition, such as those from @Sernorman and @sotolux asking about the timing belt and air conditioning functionality. Other users, like @BristolRanger and @DropOut, noted potential issues with the vehicle's documentation and battery hold-down, respectively. Additionally, there were references to the car's performance specs, with users discussing the vehicle's engine and its similarities to the Mazda 323, indicating that it has a rich legacy tied to reliable engineering.
Negative: Minor concerns were raised by users about specific issues with the car, such as the reported squeak in the steering wheel mentioned by @sotolux and the interpretation of a door defect discussed with @technoshark. These worries coupled with inquiries about essential components like the timing belt reflect a cautious approach among potential bidders. @05EvORS pointed out the seemingly missing battery hold down, indicating that while the car is valued, there are aspects that may require attention to ensure it remains in great shape.
|
 |
Positive: @Joswar01 expressed enthusiasm for the car, especially as a fan of hot hatches, and was curious about its horsepower and maintenance needs. @MSQ acknowledged the vehicle's status as a collectible and raised an interesting question about its power output, stating that although stock models were around 224HP, the car is said to produce 530HP with modifications. @leegourlay reminisced about their own experience with a similar model, believing this vehicle delivers great fun and wishing good luck to the seller. Several commenters appreciate the vehicle's rarity and performance potential, with @Carbonman77 noting that significant money was spent on upgrades, making it a true joy to drive.
Neutral: @Bulletmotorsportsinc, the seller, confirmed that the car indeed produces 530HP at high boost and is tuned for high octane fuel. Commenters discussed necessary modifications and the importance of having a specification sheet to clarify what upgrades were made. @otoupalik inquired about the car's air conditioning system, asking for details since such features are crucial in some areas, and sought confirmation on performance with different octane levels. @Sernorman highlighted a need for better transparency regarding the vehicle's modifications to inform potential buyers effectively.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's readiness for everyday use, particularly @otoupalik, who emphasized the importance of AC for driving comfort, especially in warm climates. There were speculations about the integrity of the build, with @Stagehand questioning the vehicle's performance reliability given the lack of documentation. Additionally, commenters like @Dangerism and @VR4ownzU suggested that the absence of detailed build information and the car's unknown mileage might underrepresent its true condition and could be off-putting for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the Maserati MC20, highlighting its stunning design and impressive performance specs. Commentors like @caymangone and @Fauxshowpony rave about the car's beauty and unique modifications, with @DanDuran02 sharing a positive experience from personally purchasing another car from @CallMeAl007, the seller, and noting the owner's dedication to preserving car quality. The modifications improve speed and driving experience, with @travisgallatin noting that the car’s lowered ride height enhances handling without sacrificing comfort. The photography in the listing is also highly praised, which showcases the car well.
Neutral: Commentors acknowledge the potential concerns regarding the future value of a higher-mileage MC20, as mentioned by @ama74, prompting curiosity about its depreciation history. Discussion around the efficacy of modifications and performance enhancements can also be observed, with some users like @gqrob28 pointing out that certain features were not mentioned in the description, while @LongDucDong raises the point about the desire for a manual transmission option. Meanwhile, @Drdjet seeks clarification on technical issues with the car such as the replacement of transaxles, indicating that some buyers might prioritize detailed technical transparency before making an investment.
Negative: On the flip side, skepticism surrounds the vehicle's durability with concerns about the relatively high wear on the seat bolsters shared by @bavarianstance, indicating potential quality issues for a car with low mileage. @m0leman appreciates the driving video but indicates a desire for more information on the vehicle's components. Some comments hint at the comparison to performance rivals like the C8 Z06, with @caymangone suggesting that the Z06 has superior performance metrics, while others, like @thelastone, argue in favor of the MC20, asserting its advantages in handling and aesthetics despite these rivalries.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its aesthetic appeal and quality, with many users expressing admiration for its condition and beauty. @alfriedesq describes it as 'amazing' and praises the custom floor mats, while @Jayin760 states it's an 'absolute beauty' and encourages potential buyers to bid with confidence. @intrick and @Dave_Car_Guy both compliment the seller's knowledge and meticulous care for the car, suggesting it is in showroom condition and delivers a wonderful driving experience. @flyingbrick242 appreciates the F430's potential for increasing value over time, further boosting its positive perception among commenters.
Neutral: Neutral comments mainly concern inquiries about the vehicle's maintenance history and specific features. Users like @mike_747 and @KatA-Tonic ask for clarifications on the condition of the clutch and exhaust manifolds, as well as details about tire age and maintenance documentation. @serve-n-folly and @Rfncw also request more information about service records and specific components, indicating a cautious but interested approach. Some commenters, such as @coveredallwinter and @Hot_Wheels, seek clarification about missing documents and past incidents reported on the car's AutoCheck, reflecting a desire for thorough transparency before making a purchase decision.
Negative: Negative feedback is minimal but highlights concerns about the car's maintenance documentation and potential issues linked to its history. @5DW points out the lack of extensive maintenance receipts during the seller's ownership, questioning the car's overall upkeep despite the seller's claims. Additionally, @emark raises red flags regarding an accident listed on AutoCheck, seeking further explanation from the seller. Overall, while there are some apprehensions regarding documentation and parts, the overarching sentiment leans favorably towards the car's condition and the seller's integrity.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their fondness and nostalgia for this 1990 Nissan Maxima. @Fiveyearspast (The Seller) highlighted the car's beautiful condition and original features, appealing to bidders with confidence about its rarity and quality. Commenters like @yk26 and @lytlejackson reminisced about their past experiences with the Maxima, emphasizing its smooth performance and reliability, which many remembered fondly from their youth. @Fleche_dOr noted that the car is not only a comfortable sedan but also a capable driver’s car, drawing comparisons to higher-performance vehicles like the E39 M5, while others acknowledged its impressive engineering and solid construction.
Neutral: There was a mix of curiosity and admiration for the auction process. @MegaMind99 and @Silrossi46 debated the car's history and pricing, with some commenting on previous attempts to sell it online. @Fiveyearspast (The Seller) clarified details about the vehicle, like its maintenance and condition, which added to the transparency of the auction. Several members shared positive feedback about the Bose stereo system and acknowledged the appeal of a well-maintained classic car, though questions about the reasons for the sale and market trends were also discussed.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the pricing and the frequency of the car's listings, with @MegaMind99 indicating skepticism about the reasons for selling and questioning the car's reliability due to its resale history. Skepticism regarding the engine specifications and potential maintenance issues was voiced, pointing to the car’s age and the possibility of deterioration despite its low mileage. Overall, while most commenters admired the vehicle, some expressed caution about bidding, drawing attention to the realities of classic car ownership and market value.
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) asserts that the vehicle drives perfectly straight and provides a super sporty feel, indicating confidence in the car's performance despite comments about issues with tie rods and alignment. This positive sentiment about the driving experience is echoed by the belief that the vehicle handles well, which suggests that buyers may find satisfaction in how the car operates on the road. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) also emphasizes that they do not believe an alignment is necessary at this time.
Neutral: @Jfolckemer inquires about the receipt for the vehicle's alignment and raises a concern regarding discrepancies in mileage seen on multiple documents, suggesting that clarity is needed regarding the vehicle's service history. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) acknowledges the situation and explains the discrepancy was due to a clerical error made by the dealership, providing a rationale for the differing mileage figures. This neutral stance shows a willingness to address buyer concerns but does not confirm the completion of all repairs.
Negative: @patom expresses concern over the unresolved issues that appear to surround the tie rods and alignment, implying that there may be a risk in purchasing the vehicle without resolution. Their belief that the tie rod problem remains unaddressed, combined with a lack of evidence of completed repairs, could deter potential buyers who prioritize a fully functional vehicle. @Jfolckemer also highlights the importance of proper documentation in vehicle purchases, questioning the transparency of the seller regarding past repairs.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed a strong appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and unique characteristics. @Scott68GTO acknowledged the emotional difficulty of letting go of such a car, while @Barryward noted that finding another '88 is a stroke of fate. @Craven complimented the Club Sedan's aesthetic appeal, especially the cute rear-end of the car, and @ButWhatDoIKnow characterized it as a beautiful car, asking if it had a backup camera. Additionally, @Randym1100 shared their love for the car, showing excitement about its features and potential upgrades.
Neutral: Several comments provided factual clarifications or inquiries about the vehicle's specifications. @Pfeil commented on the engine's modification, praising the builder for using an Olds engine instead of a more common small block Chevy, which he finds disheartening in other classic brands. @Mordizzle asked for an explanation regarding the electric switch gear under the dash, indicating interest in technical aspects. @nsxtman provided insights on the vehicle's history, confirming that it was not originally a Rocket 88 but had been altered, while expressing curiosity about various features like the rheostat switch observed in the photographs.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's heating system were raised by users such as @ketch347, who expressed hesitation about bidding due to the lack of heating, important for colder climates. @nsxtman pointed out inconsistencies regarding the heating setup, noting that certain hoses appeared disconnected and might indicate a lack of heating functionality. Additionally, the issue of the vehicle's modifications led to debates, with @pigman and @nsxtman analyzing the photo evidence that led to uncertainties about the original setup of the heaters and how the current air conditioning system was integrated.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the beauty and performance of the 1977 Porsche 911S. @RumbleAuto described it as 'so beautiful!', while @HMW remarked on its powerful sound and appeal, indicating that this is a 'great driver’s car' with better power than expected. @lightwalker200 also confirmed the presence of a functional sunroof, and @jcvass noted how well the car was sorted with numerous good parts, calling it 'a well sorted little hot rod'.
Neutral: Comments included inquiries about specifics of the vehicle and its history. @Dave_Car_Guy asked about any California BAR stickers due to the car's modifications, indicating a degree of caution among potential buyers. @silverarrowcarsltd provided clarifications in response, mentioning the car's previous ownership and its modifications, while also emphasizing the thorough servicing that the vehicle underwent prior to sale. Several users engaged with questions about the car's features, showing genuine interest in the auction.
Negative: There were few outright negative comments, but @Johnny99 raised a concern about the headers implying that the car might not have heating capabilities, indicating potential reservations about the car's usability in colder climates. Overall, while the majority of the comments were positive or neutral, the few negative remarks highlighted specific concerns regarding the vehicle's features and clarity on its condition.
|
 |
Positive: @radiojones compliments the vehicle's appearance and motor, praising its killer color and asking about its road-worthiness in Georgia. @Dak92159 shares a positive experience with Dereck and Don Rickman, highlighting their interest in vintage bikes, which adds to the allure of the Rickman brand. @IanW expresses enthusiasm for Rickmans, indicating their uniqueness, while @911tt_7 reminisces about his childhood dream of owning a Rickman, suggesting it holds a special place in the hearts of many enthusiasts. @kstadelman fondly recalls his own Rickman bike that performed exceptionally well, further underscoring the vehicle's high regard in motorcycle culture.
Neutral: @TrailerTed (The Seller) clarifies the bike's title status in Georgia and notes its dim lights by modern standards, providing transparency about the vehicle's legal and functional aspects. @2hecknback departs from commenting solely on sentiment, discussing technical details of the bike like carburetor configurations and braking systems, which indicates a knowledgeable perspective yet lacks emotional weight. This comment emphasizes the bike's complexity and adaptations for street use while mentioning its versatile characteristics for both paved and dirt roads. In response, @radiojones engages further in the technical discussion about historical racing modifications related to the bike's design and intended uses.
Negative: @threeducs3 shares a past negative experience with a similar Rickman bike, describing persistent mechanical issues, which contrasts sharply with the otherwise positive impressions. Additionally, while the technical comments from @2hecknback and @TrailerTed provide factual insights, they also hint at potential concerns for novice riders regarding maintenance and the bike's suitability for casual driving. However, no overtly negative comments dominate the overall sentiment towards the vehicle, indicating that the negatives are more about personal anecdotes rather than widespread issues.
|
 |
Positive: The car is described as very sharp and beautiful, looking much better in person according to @jimmycherry (The Seller). It has been well-maintained, having been owned by an elderly couple for eleven years, always garage-kept, and used only as a weekend driver. Additionally, @jimmycherry (The Seller) confirms that the vehicle has the original paint color and appears like new, with the interior also noted to smell pristine, enhancing its appeal to prospective buyers.
Neutral: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's repair history, specifically the replacement of the fuel injection pump and purge valve. @brad1610 expressed curiosity about these repairs, while @jimmycherry (The Seller) acknowledged his lack of awareness regarding the dealer repairs prior to purchasing the car. Queries from potential buyers like @Audi0adict asked for clarification on warning lights, minor damages such as a chip in the windshield, and additional features like key availability and tire specifications, indicating that buyers are being thorough in their inquiries.
Negative: Some negative aspects arose surrounding the vehicle's maintenance, particularly regarding the warning lights and repair costs. @Audi0adict expressed concern about a yellow warning light on the dashboard and the circumstances surrounding the hood latch issue, noting that the repairs quoted by the dealership were prohibitively expensive. Furthermore, @rich0 mentioned experiencing a common issue with similar vehicles, hinting at potential reliability concerns. This highlights a divide in perceptions, where some are enthusiastic about the vehicle's condition, while others are cautious due to its repair history.
|
 |
Positive: @Kurte551 (The Seller) shares positive experiences with the vehicle, stating that it pulls like "a freight train" and has had no issues with the air suspension, which complements its performance. Other commenters, such as @Rdog47, echo this sentiment by describing the vehicle as a "nice ride," indicating a general appreciation for the car's performance and appearance. Overall, the vehicle seems well-regarded by its owner and those commenting positively on it.
Neutral: Commenters have asked technical questions regarding various aspects of the vehicle, such as the air suspension, tire sizes, and the status of the radiator. @SirMercsALot inquired about a discrepancy in the tire sizes mentioned in the listing, prompting @Kurte551 to clarify the correct sizes and that OEM rims are used. Further queries by commenters also include the condition of the wood trim and the presence of any liens, showcasing potential buyers’ interest in the details and history of the vehicle without indicating strong positive or negative sentiments.
Negative: Some comments hint at concerns about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the burled wood on the ashtray compartment, with @Blane asking if it is cracked. While @Kurte551 confirmed a small crack, he maintained that there are no stains on the leather and reiterated the car's status as a non-smoker vehicle. Additionally, @Yeezers raised a question about a possible lien on the car, suggesting potential complications associated with its ownership and financial standing.
|
 |
Positive: @sjupton commented on the vehicle's appearance, stating it looks great, while @Chris_RageLeonard (The Seller) mentioned that a video showcasing the engine start-up to third gear is available in the gallery, indicating transparency about the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: @AnyOldIron pointed out that there weren't enough pictures available for serious bidders, suggesting that more visuals are needed to make an informed decision. @mmorrissey also requested a driving video, specifically from a full stop through third gear, showing that potential buyers are interested in assessing the vehicle's performance firsthand.
Negative: @ethanberk raised critical queries about the necessity for additional photos of specific areas to check for rust and also asked about service history for the gearbox and transfer case, reflecting concerns about maintenance and condition issues. @Chris_RageLeonard (The Seller) responded, indicating he would search for the service records and noted no issues with gears jumping, but the request for more detailed information highlights some apprehension among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its charm and historical significance among BMW enthusiasts. @Shaun described it as 'so cool!' while @Lengrep noted the craftsmanship with 'nice work!' @pegs called it a 'beautiful car', and @JBinAustin referred to it as a 'nice time capsule' from when BMW made true driver's cars. Additionally, @WildOnion praised the engine bay cleanliness and the quality of the paint, indicating a strong temptation to consider purchasing the vehicle. Enthusiasts like @kkherman reminisced about its performance, asserting it was 'really fast for its time' and comparable to the Turbo version.
Neutral: The seller, @PegasusGT, actively engages with potential buyers, responding to queries and addressing concerns about the car's history. Enthusiasts requested various details, such as the car's origin letter from BMW and the status of equipment like the A/C and heater systems. Commenters like @Pur_sang inquired about any potential issues with gears or clutch, and @Bajasur sought clarification on the vehicle's repaint history and whether the car had experienced any accidents. There was overall a sense of community and shared interest in preserving the car's history and condition.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle, such as @Maharaja questioning blistering next to the jack spur and the originality of the engine in relation to the VIN. @ALW62 felt there were too few photos demonstrating the car's condition, suggesting potential buyers might feel uninformed. @stevenlars mentioned the need for repairs, such as the heater blower motor and clock, indicating that the car might require some restoration work. Additionally, @Bajasur expressed disappointment over the loss of service records and inquired about the history of any accidents, reflecting worries about the potential hidden issues not disclosed by the seller.
|
 |
Positive: @Jonfrancis mentioned that everything in the vehicle works as it should, with all buttons, lights, switches, levers, locks, and the hydraulic top functioning properly. The seller, @integra22244, also highlighted the quality of the factory Bose stereo and speakers, adding that they sound great and that although there was some difficulty in tuning into local radio stations, they primarily streamed music from their phone. Overall, the vehicle appears to be in good working order and is described as a fun drive during the summer months.
Neutral: @jwcunningham65 inquired about the reason for selling the car so soon, to which @integra22244 responded that they needed to make more garage space for other projects. The seller enjoyed driving the convertible during the summer in New York but does not plan to use it during the winter due to adverse road conditions. Additionally, @John_ford raised a question about the driver's seat condition in one of the images, which @integra22244 clarified was just a reflection rather than damage, confirming the seat's good condition without cracks or tears and that debris had fallen into the car during a photo session.
Negative: @fguerreroc had multiple questions regarding the car's condition, including inquiries about any odors, the state of the engine bay, and whether the check engine light operates normally. Concerns were raised about the vehicle's lack of a valid inspection and potential electronic or mechanical issues, such as leaks and A/C performance. @integra22244 addressed these concerns, assuring that the vehicle has no unusual smells, that it was well maintained with no electronic or mechanical issues noted, and explained the inspection process in New York State, clarifying that the last inspection was valid until June 2024.
|
Lingenfelter-Modified 2013 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Convertible
2G1FL3DP3D9803707
Lot 208776
Private Party
 |
Positive: The vehicle is highly praised for its stunning aesthetics and high-performance features. @onlinems highlights that it is a 2013 Lingenfelter Chevrolet ZL1 Camaro Convertible with super low mileage, and the listing is presented with great confidence to potential bidders. The seller notes that the car comes complete with Lingenfelter Certification, the original window sticker, all necessary books and manuals, and both sets of keys and fobs, making it a well-documented and desirable vehicle.
Neutral: Potential buyers have expressed interest in specific details regarding the car's condition and components. @AlPalmer10 asked for close-up pictures of the front spoiler damage, confirming that a new lower splitter is included in the sale, along with the custom car cover. Additionally, inquiries were made about the Mag Ride shocks to ensure they are in good condition, to which the seller responded that photos would be provided after the holiday weekend and reassured buyers about the lack of issues related to the shocks.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about potential discrepancies regarding the vehicle's transmission. @Wild_Child61 pointed out that the window sticker indicates a 6-speed manual transmission, while the pictures depict an automatic. This led to confusion that the seller needed to clarify. This highlights a key area of concern that potential buyers are aware of, emphasizing the importance of clear communication regarding vehicle specifications.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a generally positive sentiment towards the vehicle, especially regarding its overall functionality. @smoothoperator713 reassures potential buyers that the A/C is operational, which is a significant concern for many in warmer climates. Additionally, tires are well-maintained with 70% tread remaining, suggesting that they have been cared for and are reliable for driving.
Neutral: Several inquiries indicate a neutral stance towards certain features of the vehicle. @tesoffice asks about the sunroof function, leading to @smoothoperator713 clarifying that while it is functional, the shade can get stuck, which is a minor issue. Similarly, @Coehawk71 raises questions about the A/C and tire condition, indicating that prospective buyers are conducting due diligence but are not deterred by any negative information thus far.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by commenters that could be perceived as negative. @tesoffice's inquiry about the disabled sunroof function suggests that there may be some unexpected issues with the vehicle, and @Coehawk71's question about the A/C indicates a lack of detailed information available about its proper functioning. Overall, there are hints of apprehension regarding certain aspects that could affect the buying decision.
|
 |
Positive: There are numerous enthusiastic comments regarding the Lotus Emira, particularly highlighting its exceptional driving experience and aesthetic appeal. @reh2626 describes it as the best street car Lotus has produced, praising its amazing handling and collectible nature, while @P992G911 admires the car's looks from every angle. Many users, including @Serj and @Clarkieaj, comment on how rewarding and enjoyable the car is to drive, with @Serj noting its superlative driving dynamics which surpass even higher-priced competitors. Additionally, comments from @bhhumphrey and @lotusfarm echo the sentiment that the car's MSRP presents a tremendous bargain considering its performance capabilities and heritage.
Neutral: Several commenters address the brand health and market popularity of the Lotus Emira. @P992G911 expresses concern over recent layoffs at Lotus due to market issues but remains hopeful for recovery. @Rusty.Friddell mentions preferences for design adjustments, such as shoulder bolstering and steering features, while others like @mkg.elm suggest alignment adjustments might alleviate driving concerns noted by some, like the twitchiness at high speeds. @nee (The Seller) provides details about the car's condition and maintenance, underscoring its storage and care, effectively answering inquiries and engaging interested buyers.
Negative: Despite the many positive comments, some concerns have been raised about the vehicle. @LotusFarm points out that while the driving experience is exhilarating, there are aspects such as the shifter that could use improvement. @Rusty.Friddell notes a preference for more stable performance compared to competitors like the Porsche 718 GT4, hinting at a twitchiness issue at high speeds. Additionally, comments from @tomgs and others suggest that some people might undervalue the Toyota drivetrain, despite its reliability and established racing heritage, highlighting a disconnect between appreciation for the car's engineering and its actual performance. Overall, there are mixed feelings regarding brand stability and some features of the car.
|
 |
Positive: @gravytrain9 described the vehicle as stunning and @Vince993s expressed a preference for the car's color, noting its options and features while calling it gorgeous and nicely optioned. @SwissMovement also acknowledged the appeal of the Speed Yellow, indicating that it always looks impressive on a 993. @Houstonbuckeye remarked on the vehicle's incredible appearance in its color, and @obietajoc agreed that it is a beautiful car.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed shipping logistics, with @kkCsepel13 sharing their shipping experience and @benchu (The Seller) providing detailed shipping cost information from Hawaii to the mainland. @Codified offered insights into potentially protracted shipping times but noted that past experiences with Matson were satisfactory. The seller committed to assist in getting the car to port and confirmed that it is currently registered, offering reassurance to potential buyers.
Negative: Some negative sentiments emerged regarding the shipping process, with @Codified highlighting the challenges and potential issues that can arise when shipping vehicles from Hawaii. Concerns about the quality of shipping services were raised, although @benchu (The Seller) countered these claims with positive experiences. Additionally, users raised questions about the vehicle's service history and paint meter readings, with one user noting surprising measurements on the passenger door.
|
 |
Positive: @JLsKA510 praises the vehicle as a great build, noting that states like Oregon and Texas have fantastic trucks. @boaboyoz refers to it as a beautiful black Beavercreek C10 with a bodacious build, and a cool design that he admires. @Zpainter evaluates it positively, calling it a sweet ride and teasing the financial implications when bidding begins, expressing confidence that the vehicle is a winner. @DRIVEGUY also appreciates the excellent build referencing its great engine, adding that he believes gauge issues should be minor fixes, while @Lorenzoo humorously suggests that driving it immediately triggers burnouts, indicating the powerful performance.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed curiosity about specific details of the vehicle. @Carwasher noted some gauges may not be working and inquired if all the lights function correctly, also suggesting the addition of a driving video for better insights. @natew51 pointed out the lack of attention the vehicle is getting in early bids, implying potential interest that hasn't materialized yet. @Ztruckman36 mentioned a lack of communication from the seller, highlighting the absence of a driving video and unanswered questions, which creates uncertainty for potential buyers.
Negative: On the flip side, concerns were raised about some aspects of the vehicle's condition. @Tigger1994 specifically asked for more details on the rust mentioned on the rockers and requested photos to assess the paint's condition. @DantheElcoMan corrected the seller on the year of the vehicle, claiming it's a 1966 and not a 1965, indicating potential misrepresentation. Lastly, @Ztruckman36 emphasized the lack of responses and updates from the seller, which is seen as unusual and raises suspicions about the selling process.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters have expressed positive experiences with similar vehicles, highlighting their reliability and long-lasting performance. @Philpug shared that they owned a 2008 model that they put nearly 200,000 miles on, as well as a 2018 that has 120,000 miles, confirming their satisfaction and willingness to buy similar models despite previous engine replacements. @hughespt (The Seller) mentioned that the engine hours are low and align with the mileage, reinforcing the idea that this particular vehicle should be great, given their past experiences with high-mileage models without problems.
Neutral: Comments included requests for further information on the vehicle, such as engine hours and tire dates. @Bentley1WO asked about the engine hours, while @rscarff inquired about a close-up video of the motor running at idle. Another user, @DVKDAL, brought up concerns regarding potential flex fuel issues, but @hughespt (The Seller) clarified that the vehicle currently has no check engine lights or stored codes, answering some concerns while remaining neutral about potential problems.
Negative: There are notable concerns regarding the vehicle's engine reliability from some commenters. @rscarff indicated personal experience with previous models requiring full motor replacements due to known GM issues, similarly echoed by @BCannon, who discussed the problematic nature of the model year related to the AFM/DOD system. Even though @hughespt (The Seller) defended the Suburban's current condition, the caution from other users suggests a prevailing sense of apprehension about hidden issues that could arise in the future.
|
 |
Positive: @lemondzurich believes that the WRs from this era are fantastic bikes, and @Erikf555 describes this particular bike as the Yamaha equivalent to the famous Kawasaki KDX200, praising its capability. @Albevintage also expresses admiration, wishing the seller good luck and reiterating that it's a great bike.
Neutral: @Chowhall, the seller, is open to questions and admits uncertainty about the bike's mileage, while noting that it might be roughly accurate. They acknowledge a slight tweak in the left radiator but claim they aren't aware of any significant issues with the rear subframe, promising to take further photos when they can. They clarify that while the bike is rideable, it is not in showroom condition, and offer to provide images of its undercarriage upon their return to inspect the bike.
Negative: Concerns have been raised by @wasteaway regarding picture #11, suggesting it appears that the bike's subframe is misaligned, a point that @Chowhall confirms but states he will investigate further. @2hecknback points out that the swing arm chain buffer is worn, and he suggests additional photos could provide context on the bike's condition, indicating a need for transparency about signs of wear. Overall, while the seller is forthcoming about the bike's state, there are lingering concerns about its physical condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) presents the 2012 Bentley Continental GT W12 as an outstanding vehicle with remarkable value potential. According to the seller, this car, which has a previous auction record of $93,500 plus fees, is now positioned to sell at a significant discount. It is being marketed with a no-reserve auction approach, making it an appealing opportunity for potential buyers looking for value in the high-end luxury vehicle market. The dealership has a reputation for excellence, boasting a 4.9/5.0 rating with numerous positive reviews, indicating a commitment to quality and customer satisfaction.
Neutral: Several inquiries about the vehicle's condition have been made, with @WisdomFirst noticing the leather on the door panels is detached, prompting questions about the car's overall value and improvements. @DanKennison and other commenters have asked about specific features, such as whether the third brake light works, which @Collectibleclassics confirmed, assuring that all lights function as intended. The car's history and retail versus wholesale value have also been discussed, suggesting a complex background in its selling price and market positioning.
Negative: @REXRXPORSCHE raised concerns about the vehicle being advertised for sale at no reserve, while simultaneously listed on a wholesale website at a considerably higher fixed price, suggesting potential confusion or inconsistency in the seller's approach. The seller has acknowledged some issues with the car, including separation of leather door cards and scratches on the windshield due to a previous owner’s attempt at repair. Although the seller believes these do not impede functionality, they indicate areas needing attention that potential buyers should be aware of.
|
|
|