Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered significant admiration for its originality and excellent documentation, which many commenters, like @Johnny3 and @Jack-Porsche, highlight as key attributes that elevate its status as a collector's car. They appreciate the car's preservation over the decades, with @trbo76 (The Seller) sharing his meticulous approach to maintaining the vehicle, including the use of Porsche Classic parts. Commenters express excitement over the car's history, with @Frida noting its raw driving experience, and many praising its aesthetic appeal and the owner's dedication to the car's legacy.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions about the vehicle's specifications, with @935DP pointing out that the car originally came with staggered 15" rims, while @voitureltd references the optional axle ratio for clarification. A few inquiries regarding its equipment for smog compliance in California were raised, notably by @RBV2022, which @trbo76 (The Seller) addressed by explaining the lack of original smog pieces available, indicating potential challenges for California buyers. Conversations also touch on the seller's history with the car, where @Mozart questions whether it was tracked, revealing a mix of curiosity around its past and current condition.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about the car's functionality and adaptability for modern standards, particularly around emissions, as raised by @RBV2022. @trbo76 (The Seller) informed them that it does not have the original smog components, which could be a drawback for potential buyers living in states with strict regulations. Additionally, @RR2017's inquiry about instrumentation and air conditioning systems elicits a somewhat disappointing answer from the seller, stating that while everything functions, the air conditioning may require recharging and is not optimal for the car's age, indicating possible maintenance challenges ahead for future owners.
![]() |
2023 Ford Mustang GT Carroll Shelby Centennial Edition Coupe 6-Speed
1FA6P8CF0P5299920
Lot 209862
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @05FordGT describes the vehicle as beautiful, praising its Atlas blue color and the impressive package that comes with it. @NVGT350 finds the CSC fabulous and expresses a sentiment about parting with it too soon, wishing good luck to the seller. @ParadiseRoad compliments the car as perfection in a Shelby, while @msteiner and @mike_rockwell agree on the fantastic appearance and performance of the car further amplifying the positive feedback.
Neutral: @JohnLodi (The Seller) responds to the comments graciously, thanking everyone for their kind words and sharing details about the car's challenging procurement process, the unique features of the build, and the story behind being able to acquire car #23, which he considers significant. He mentions that the car checks every box and highlights its one-of-a-kind nature, also addressing questions about the matching coins and watch.
Negative: @Lobek expresses admiration for the vehicle's low mileage while conveying disbelief at the restraint required to limit driving such a car. @Longmire45 remarks on the unfortunate need for @JohnLodi (The Seller) to sell the car, hinting at curiosity about other potential colors available, which points to some disappointment in parting with the vehicle. @OneOfEach brings up an irrelevant but humorous question about a CD player, suggesting a lighthearted critique of the car's modern features.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg describes the Phaeton as an absolute gem, emphasizing its impressive condition. @Middler89 finds it gorgeous and wishes the seller good luck. @johnmereness praises it as a fantastic road car, highlighting the advantages of a non-supercharged model for touring, and notes its solid appearance. @Ian9000 (The Seller) acknowledges these compliments and mentions that the car has been a pleasure to drive and is a rare find for classic car enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Sparrownaut notes that it's not bad for a 90-year-old automobile, suggesting some appreciation for its age. @hr47cars raises concerns about the lack of a driving video in the listing, emphasizing the importance of 'driveability' for potential bidders. @billyblyth inquires about photos of the car with the top down and a parade boot cover, positively commenting on the top's condition.
Negative: @cordfan points out that the door pillars are missing from the pictures, questioning their availability, though @Ian9000 (The Seller) reassures that they are indeed included. @TheOMDude questions whether the mascot on the vehicle can still be considered a "hood ornament" if it's not located on the hood, indicating some confusion over terminology. Overall, there appears to be some skepticism regarding specific details of the vehicle's presentation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters overall appreciate the 1990 Corvette ZR-1 for its classic design and performance. @portiagsd highlighted that the aesthetics of the C4 ZR-1 have aged beautifully and offer a significant value compared to earlier models, while expressing enjoyment from previous ownership experiences with similar vehicles. @fastpace discussed the strong community support for these models, indicating that parts are readily available, which adds to the appeal of owning this vehicle. Additionally, many commenters, such as @Bmarcum and @z-rex, praised the performance and durability of the LT5 engine, reinforcing the idea that the ZR-1 is a special model in the Corvette lineup.
Neutral: Several participants shared daily maintenance experiences and specific inquiries about the vehicle's functionality. @Lit23 asked about the passenger side window, to which @fastpace confirmed it operates smoothly but noted some noise due to the vehicle's age. @makes_z inquired about modifications made to the car, particularly regarding the Haibeck performance chip and other non-stock parts, showing an interest in the vehicle's performance enhancements. Throughout the discussion, there were acknowledgments of high-quality documentation and owner care, as mentioned by @Chadley_Cooper, which adds credibility to the vehicle's history.
Negative: Concerns were raised about some aspects of the vehicle. @portiagsd pointed out the maintenance challenges of the LT5 engine due to the rarity of qualified mechanics familiar with its design, suggesting potential difficulty for future owners. Additionally, @classiccamaros questioned the tire performance, seeking more information about them. There was also a note from @twonot1 regarding potential discrepancies in technical service bulletins, indicating that there might be uncertainty about some maintenance details. Overall, while the vehicle is well-regarded, potential buyers are advised to be aware of these challenges.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The overall sentiment about the 2013 BMW 135i is positive, with several comments praising its styling and performance. @halfthrottle described it as a "definitely a future classic" with its "crisp styling and not overdone with electronics," while @Levante highlighted the car's clean design and balanced performance, stating that the 135i is becoming more appreciated over time. Additionally, @MTN remarked on the beautiful and unusual spec of the car, giving compliments on its smart options that enhance its appeal.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the auction process and the vehicle's history rather than explicitly praising or critiquing its features. @EvorICE raised a good point about the auction's reserve price compared to previous listings, encouraging a discussion about the car's true value. @Levante addressed this concern, sharing insights regarding market perceptions and how certain models like the 135i may be undervalued by traditional channels. @jdmwol2ks noted their experience with a similar 135i, expressing hope that this auction performs better.
Negative: On the less favorable side, there were inquiries that hinted at concerns about the vehicle's damage history. @DinanM3 asked about any damage information, prompting @Levante to respond that the damage was minor according to CarFax, clarifying that it would not affect the car's operation or safety. This exchange may signal potential apprehensions from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's history, although @Levante's assurance aimed to alleviate those concerns.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, appreciating its clean design and distinctive features. @craZee highlighted the euphoric feeling of owning such a sweet ride. @Piros1 praised the vehicle's cleanliness and how well the interior complements its exterior. The uniqueness of the car also caught attention, with @loggdon noting its differences from other models. Commenters like @mike_rockwell commended the detailed build and efficiency of the 4.3 engine, emphasizing its suitability for quick movement and ample space in the engine compartment. Overall, the positive remarks showcase admiration for the car's aesthetics and performance.
Neutral: Several questions and requests for details about the car reflected a more neutral stance. @Hemiman and @T7190 inquired about the vehicle's location and battery placement, while @cad58Y asked for clarification about the engine type. Additionally, @edjs posed several questions regarding features like the master cylinder access panel and air conditioning. @dustyjeeper's query about the chassis construction and horsepower indicates a keen interest in specific technical details, further highlighting the engine's specifications provided by the seller, @ColoradoCowboy. The clarity of this information helps shape a neutral understanding of the vehicle.
Negative: Few negative comments were directed at the vehicle, with inquiries regarding various features hinting at potential concerns. @dustyjeeper asked about the type of chassis and the originality of the components, which could suggest doubts about the vehicle's authenticity. @Callickshift jokingly noted that every girl goes crazy for a sharp-dressed man, which could imply that the car's appeal is more about style than substance. @70GTO455HO's question about the lack of a heater may point to a missed feature that some buyers might expect from such a vehicle. However, the overall sentiment remained mostly positive, with only mild uncertainty expressed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments praise the car's appearance and enhancements. @Likeparty notes that the Mustang retains an original look with tasteful upgrades, while @stugottz describes it as beautiful and nicely optioned. @Curvette1 emphasizes that black is a color that usually does not impact the car's value negatively, further noting that the vehicle is well-presented and looks fantastic. Overall, commentators appreciate the Mustang's aesthetics and modifications, looking forward to its potential sale.
Neutral: Several users have requested more information or images related to the car. @mtenvoorde and @Bobby817 are specifically interested in seeing pictures of the rear quarter panels and paint blemishes, respectively. @Gmorris3 and @GeneralNoob are curious about the availability of driving videos and in-person visits to view the vehicle, indicating an ongoing dialogue about the car's condition and features. The seller, @keigel18, is responsive and provides the requested images and information, showcasing engagement with potential buyers.
Negative: There are minor concerns raised regarding the car's authenticity and features. @khoeilar questions why the seller is parting with the vehicle after a short ownership period, although @keigel18 clarifies that they have owned it for three years and made upgrades. @PeachStateClassics notes a potential issue with the shipping calculator, suggesting that it may not be functioning properly, a sentiment echoed by other commenters. These issues cast a slight shadow over an otherwise positive reception of the vehicle.
![]() |
64k-Mile 2006 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 LS Crew Cab 5-Speed Dually
1GCJC33U76F191126
Lot 209868
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express great enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its unique features. @tomlawrence28 refers to the truck as a 'Unicorn,' emphasizing its rarity. @CRUSH appreciates the inclusion of a 5-speed manual transmission and notes the appeal of having three pedals. @KROD shares a similar sentiment, calling the truck a beauty and loving its manual transmission, even though he has no practical need for it.
Neutral: There are practical discussions among commenters regarding the vehicle's specifications and history. @RoyGbiv shares insights about the engine, noting that GM has continued to use the 300 HP version of the 6.0 L engine from 2000 instead of the upgraded versions available in later models. @YouAintLowTrucks expresses admiration but acknowledges potential budget constraints in acquiring the truck. The seller, @STEELANDSTEEZ, responds to questions about towing and potential use, indicating that the truck was not used for heavy labor and has never been equipped with trailer brakes, only used occasionally for errands.
Negative: Some comments reflect disappointment regarding the vehicle’s limitations. @YouAintLowTrucks mentions concern that the price might exceed their budget, indicating a feeling of exclusion from ownership. Additionally, @RoyGbiv notes a downside by mentioning the truck's 2WD configuration, feeling it could be better suited with 4WD. Overall, the comments highlight a mix of admiration and some practical concerns, particularly related to the vehicle's intended use and pricing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg describes the vehicle as a "Gorgeous Panamera 4 PE!" indicating a strong admiration for its appearance. @JdeLeuze, the seller, emphasizes the meticulous care taken with the vehicle, stating that it has been regularly washed, detailed, and only driven by him on paved roads. The seller’s commitment to maintaining the car in pristine condition is further highlighted by the high-quality ceramic coating applied last May and the regular servicing practices that suggest a vehicle treated with great respect and pride of ownership.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the condition of the vehicle, such as @1990c4 noting the appearance of potential bubbling on the dashboard, although @JdeLeuze has clarified that there is no bubbling present, and it may be a result of lighting. @NoDeuda raises questions about possible water damage seen in some photos, while @1990c4 expresses concerns regarding the service history related to the PDK transmission mounts being replaced at low mileage, indicating some apprehension among potential buyers, but also acknowledging that the car is nicely optioned overall.
Negative: @NoDeuda and @1990c4 express concerns regarding potential issues with the vehicle's history, such as water damage and wear from driving on salt flats, which raises red flags about the car's overall condition. The mention of the car being driven in a dust storm further adds to these worries, leading to skepticism about its maintenance. While @JdeLeuze tries to reassure potential buyers about the car's care and state, the initial comments reflect doubt and the need for further validation, which could dissuade some buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight positive experiences regarding the vehicle's build quality and features. @Luke38 (The Seller) provides detailed responses about the dimensions of storage and living areas, indicating thoughtful design tailored to functionality, such as a waterproof container for snow. The van's heating system operates efficiently, drawing from the fuel tank and suggests a well-constructed energy management system that hasn’t failed the owner, reassuring potential buyers about power reliability. Additionally, @infiman and @liketowatch appreciate the dimensions and sleeping comfort of the bed, emphasizing the living space's adaptability and comfort for taller individuals.
Neutral: Many inquiries focus on technical details and specifications of the vehicle, with prospective buyers asking about essential features. @oehninger, @blackonblack911, and @Hunter42 raise questions about the vehicle's origin, dimensions, and pricing, seeking clarity on its compatibility and practicality for specific uses like camping. @CBDiem raises a concern about a potential discrepancy in the vehicle's car history report, which prompts a systematic response from @Luke38 to clarify that the error was due to a mix-up in VINs, thus maintaining transparency while addressing buyer concerns regarding the van's past.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the history of the vehicle, particularly by @CBDiem, who discovered issues in the carfax report related to fuel tank replacements. This could cause potential buyers to question the reliability and integrity of the van’s history. In addition, the lack of hot water and the reliance on the vehicle's engine for AC functionality when parked might deter some buyers looking for more comprehensive off-grid capabilities. Despite @Luke38's assurances and clarifications about the vehicle and its maintenance, these issues linger as points of concern for potential users.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle's beauty and condition. @BimmerDadOfSix remarked on the car being a beauty and one to watch, while @sykraft expressed excitement about the potential bidding price, emphasizing its desirable features. @bigredcorp also noted the car's gorgeous color and equipment, suggesting it won't be undervalued despite some skepticism from other users. Several users, including @Vindis and @Sykotik, agree that the car is a great example of the 996 model, which is anticipated to increase in value as enthusiasts recognize its special features. Overall, there is a general consensus on the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and rarity.
Neutral: The comments also include practical inquiries and acknowledgments of the vehicle's history. @Segura911 raised questions about missing decals and possible modifications, which the seller, @wmcnair, promptly addressed, reinforcing the vehicle's well-maintained history. Users like @gst95dsm commented on specific aspects like the dual-row IMS bearing and reassured others that the vehicle should not present issues. @vidoeskatel sought more information on the underbody condition, while @gtjeff inquired about smog certification. The seller maintained transparency, providing the requested information and sharing insights on maintenance history without indicating any major concerns with the car's current state.
Negative: On the negative side, some comments suggest skepticism about the car's past maintenance and potential undisclosed issues. @Segura911 expressed doubts regarding the integrity of some car components and pointed out signs of corrosion that warranted preventive maintenance, indicating a cautious approach to the purchase. Others, like @tbirdjayc, shared experiences that align with a general insecurity towards cars that haven't had specific maintenance performed. The ongoing discussion reflects a mix of enthusiasm and caution, with some commenters urging potential buyers to thoroughly consider the maintenance records and physical condition of the vehicle before placing bids.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters generally expressed admiration for the vehicle, with @stugottz describing it as a "Handsome Goat" and @boaboyoz calling it a "fabulous Florida GTO, scintillating in silver." The seller, @Freedom32, received heartening feedback about the car's condition, with @Wayne20 praising it as a beautiful representation of a 69 GTO, noting its healthy sound when running. Additionally, @citxmech reminisced fondly about their first car being a white 69 4-speed GTO, aligning with the overall enthusiasm radiating from the comments.
Neutral: A number of comments raised questions and inquiries about the vehicle's history and specifications. @Graystone asked about PHS documentation to prove the car's authenticity, while @nbbeep pointed out a contradiction regarding the transmission type in the listing. @kevinckb6 commented on the availability of the clutch cutout and any old 4-speed components, and @63vettegirl requested details about the vehicle's history and condition. These inquiries reflect a mix of interest and the desire for clarity on the vehicle's features and background.
Negative: There were some concerns raised regarding modifications and the sale's context. @Yagottabkiddin expressed conditional interest, stating they would be more inclined to purchase if the vehicle were still a 4-speed and had original seats. @63vettegirl questioned why the car was being sold after just a year and 150 miles, probing about potential rust repairs. @nbbeep's comment suggested confusion about the transmission, reflecting possible skepticism about the seller's claims. Such critiques reveal hesitations from some potential bidders regarding the car's authenticity and the seller's transparency.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @A_MOTORS mentioned that this truck is a rare model, highlighting its desirability in the market. @Barryward noted the power of the truck, emphasizing that it is no joke to have a Powerstroke engine in this vehicle. @stevenbrooten expressed appreciation for finding another OBS/PS 4x4, which indicates a positive sentiment towards the truck's style and functionality. @The496GT500 also commented on the truck's appealing nature, expressing that the owner did well with their modifications and repairs.
Neutral: @jrgehrman (The Seller) provided a detailed account of the truck's condition and history, including previous ownership, modifications made, and maintenance history. He emphasized the truck's clean state, both inside and out, while also mentioning its age-related imperfections like minor scratches and dings. Several commenters, including @RHG357 and @aggieland_tx, asked relevant questions about the vehicle's documentation, ride quality, and maintenance, indicating engagement with the seller and interest in understanding the truck further.
Negative: @RHG357 raised concerns about the absence of original paperwork and the painting quality under the hood, suggesting potential issues with the truck's restoration. @stevenbrooten pointed out discrepancies in the truck's body parts that do not align with the original specifications for a 1997 model, raising doubts about the authenticity of certain features. @WESLEY_SNIPES inquired about the oil leak mentioned in the description, which further illustrates apprehension regarding the vehicle’s mechanical condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @stugottz highlighted that the vehicle has a lot of engine power for a small roadster, suggesting it would be a fun driving experience. @BigD36ford mentioned that even though they are not typically a fan of flames as a design element, they feel it works well on this particular car, indicating a positive reception to the aesthetic aspect. Overall, these comments reflect enthusiasm for the car's performance and design qualities.
Neutral: @Revrider noted a concern about the car being a Florida vehicle without air conditioning, which is a practical consideration but does not reflect a strong negative or positive sentiment. @Areonetee asked about headroom and knee room for taller individuals which shows a curiosity about comfort without direct opinion. @Kendal09 inquired if the top is removable, indicating interest in the car's features rather than expressing strong feelings either way.
Negative: @loggdon expressed a negative view of the soft top's appearance when folded down, calling it ugly. @Knuckles-R-Busted wondered if people frequently mistake the vehicle for a Prowler, which could imply a lack of distinctiveness in the car's design. Overall, these comments illustrate some concerns regarding the aesthetics and possible identity of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle's stunning specifications and condition. @cjack84 described it as a 'great car and very well kept', while @Jack-Porsche called the 991 Targa 'incredible'. @boaboyoz expressed their admiration for the 'magnifique' Sapphire Blue Metallic GTS, noting it as a 'scintillating specimen'. Multiple comments also highlight the low mileage, with @Preves mentioning it as a 'dream' and @Drland believing the future owner will be the 'happiest person in the world'. Overall, the car is viewed as a desirable collector's item and a standout model.
Neutral: The comments from @sjharrell, the seller, provide factual responses to inquiries about the car, such as the absence of paint protection film (PPF) and the presence of slight stone chips. They also mention the car has been well-maintained with low mileage of less than 6k, and fully serviced. The seller acknowledges the previous owner’s care of the vehicle, stating it has been garage-kept and has not been tracked, which offers potential buyers reassurance about its condition. Additionally, there was discussion on performance upgrades that some commenters are considering after viewing the car.
Negative: Some comments expressed concern regarding the servicing of the vehicle. For instance, @onehussler noted a lack of major recommended service with plugs and filters, suggesting scrutiny on maintenance records. @porsche1986 raised questions about the car's history with track usage, potentially reflecting anxiety about wear and tear, although the seller firmly denied these claims. Moreover, @ElVerde criticized the perceived value proposition of Porsche vehicles over the past decade, suggesting that while this Targa is impressive, the brand has not significantly improved its offerings relative to price.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the car's build, with @otay5000 stating they approve of the enhancements made. @shauville praised the horsepower, calling it "more than adequate" and complimenting the impressive features. @PetrolInVeins described the vehicle as the "legit coolest" they have seen, while @HAPPY highlighted the build quality and noted how difficult it is to find a comparable vehicle at its price point. @DUGEEEFRESH04 remarked on the car's stunning modifications, sharing the sentiment that it is a far cry from a typical BMW.
Neutral: Some comments sought clarification on specifics about the vehicle’s modifications and condition. @RA_SA inquired about the car's history and the engine tuning, showing interest in understanding the reasons behind the decisions made. @GreggRLewis questioned whether the brakes were stock, while @BadOne asked about any warranty on the modifications made by Pure Performance. @Thegreatmandito raised several questions regarding the car's history, ownership, and the recent modification work, indicating a need for more information before making a bid.
Negative: Concerns were also raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding its condition and transparency. @BadOne noted deep grooves in the brake rotors, which could indicate wear or lack of maintenance. Additionally, @Thegreatmandito expressed skepticism about the car's history, mentioning discrepancies in the location and title information and fearing unaddressed issues because of the multiple modifications. Users like @absent raised questions about the lienholder process, wondering how buyers could protect their interests with such complexities involved in the sale.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: There is excitement surrounding the vehicle's return, with @mloflin88 showing eagerness to watch the auction progress. @Chamonix72 humorously reflects on a low initial bid of $1,986, suggesting it was simply the start of competitive bidding. Additionally, @Handsofstone inquires about tuning options for increased performance, indicating interest from potential buyers about enhancing the vehicle's capabilities.
Neutral: The seller, @zowmaster, explains that a previous auction was not finalized due to a lack of communication from the highest bidder despite a verbal agreement, which raises questions about bidding processes. @JosCherry questions the nature of this verbal agreement, highlighting a potential discrepancy in how the auction is viewed and whether any changes were made to the auction platform's procedures. Moreover, @vegastoburque seeks clarification on any possible bans related to the previous highest bidder, indicating some ambiguity in the auction mechanics.
Negative: Comments reveal some skepticism regarding the previous auction's outcome, with @NVGT350 noting that there was no 'winning bidder' and expressing doubt about any enforcement of penalties for the highest bidder's failure to complete. @vegastoburque's inquiry about a ban hints at potential frustrations with the auction process. Overall, there seems to be a lack of trust in the auction's execution and transparency, which may affect the vehicle's perceived value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments express appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics, particularly its unique color, with @Ford512 mentioning the beauty of the color and @Queuedcars praising the rarity of the slick top feature. @Moparguy99, the seller, assures potential buyers about the vehicle's collector-grade quality, its low mileage, and that it has been stored properly. Buyers have also been informed that the vehicle underwent thorough service and detailing, which was handled by a highly regarded local shop. Furthermore, previous owners like @JakeTheSnake115 and @Queuedcars convey their happy experiences with similar models, which adds a positive sentiment about the overall enjoyment of owning and driving the Hellcat Durango.
Neutral: @Moparguy99 addresses questions and concerns, clarifying the distortion in the photograph and assuring that all tires are original. The seller also responds to inquiries such as the absence of the original window sticker by directing @slibertore to the Carfax link. @Big_Injun shares a cautionary tale about vehicle theft in the area, prompting further discussion about the importance of upgraded security features such as the recommended IGLA system by @redbull1790, indicating a general awareness among the community about current threats to vehicle safety.
Negative: There are concerns outlined by some commenters regarding vehicle security. @Queuedcars and @redbull1790 both emphasize the importance of upgrading security systems to avoid theft, with @Big_Injun sharing a personal story of a vehicle theft involving his Durango. @Ford512 raises a question about a potential issue with the driver's side rear tire in one of the pictures, which initially caused confusion. Additionally, @Longmire45 notes a peculiar decision by 'Mother MOPAR' to discontinue the production of the Jeep Grand Cherokee TrackHawk while continuing with the Hellcat Durango line.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @jbsmustang (The Seller) highlights the vehicle's award-winning status, which indicates a high level of quality and recognition. The inclusion of Vintage Air conditioning and heat also contributes positively to the overall comfort and usability of the vehicle, making it suitable for various weather conditions. Furthermore, the removable soft top feature adds versatility, allowing for an enjoyable open-air experience when desired.
Neutral: @TPraceman inquires about the presence of air conditioning, and @Glide8410 asks about the top's removability, both of which are addressed efficiently by @jbsmustang (The Seller). The response confirms that the top is completely removable, and that Vintage Air conditioning is installed, providing potential buyers with valuable information about the vehicle's features. Additionally, @Dstock66's request for HP and dyno numbers is met with clear specifications about the vehicle's engine, stating it has a Gen 2 Coyote with 435 HP, which is important for performance enthusiasts.
Negative: @naomibert points out the absence of wipers, highlighting a potential drawback that could impact the vehicle's functionality in inclement weather. This may raise concerns for prospective buyers regarding the vehicle's practicality for everyday use. Additionally, @Areonetee expresses concerns about knee and headroom with the top closed, suggesting that taller individuals might find the space limiting, which could deter some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed great enthusiasm for the Scout Traveler, highlighting its unique features and nostalgic value. @lriddlejr noted the vehicle's practicality, stating it has more room in the back compared to the standard Scout II, and appreciates its rarity. @boaboyoz praised its striking red color, while @tlcamg mentioned its bright future in the market, demonstrating confidence in the vehicle's desirability. Others, like @f4windex, reminisced fondly of their own Travelers, confirming the model's appeal and practicality with positive remarks about its seating and capacity.
Neutral: There were several points of clarification made about the vehicle's specifications. @BigD64, the seller, provided updates on the vehicle's configurations, including its two-speed transfer case and options for different wheel styles. @Crispy2B and @stevedaane brought up important details regarding the model designation and vehicle history, with the seller confirming the vehicle spent most of its life in a low salt area, contributing to its clean condition. Questions about features like air conditioning and the drive capability were addressed, ensuring potential buyers had accurate expectations.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the suitability of modifications made to the Scout Traveler. @Wildmanbill57 mentioned potential stress on wheel bearings from wheel spacers, indicating a possible downside to the current setup. Additionally, @Mr.Majestyk inquired about noises during driving, hinting at possible underlying issues. @sbuzz sought clarification on the vehicle's four-wheel-drive operation and whether modifications affected it. These comments indicate a cautious approach from some potential buyers who may be apprehensive about the vehicle's modifications and performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @fbsyn (The Seller) expresses pride in being the original owner of the vehicle and assures potential buyers that it is an unmodified, all-original STi, with only the wheels being a non-original component. The seller highlights the car's mechanically sound performance, indicating that it runs well and retains much of its original power. They also emphasize that the car has never been driven in harsh conditions, maintaining its integrity without rust or significant deterioration.
Neutral: While some comments like @ammochugs inquire about service records, specifically regarding the timing belt, @fbsyn (The Seller) admits that the timing belt has not been replaced and suggests it be done due to the car's age. Questions about the tires arise, especially concerning the reported mismatch affecting the all-wheel drive, to which @fbsyn clarifies that all tires are of the same size and brand but acknowledges potential misunderstandings in their initial presentation. Additionally, in response to @Electricchair125, the seller provides transparency about the car's condition but remains open to further questioning about both the vehicle's specifications and past maintenance.
Negative: Concerns are raised by several commenters regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly about the paint and a potential fluid leak. @homie3186 comments on the rough-looking paint and the mismatched tires, prompting @fbsyn (The Seller) to clarify that the paint is not in mint condition but acceptable for its age. Furthermore, @Electricchair125 highlights possible fluid leaks and suggests that a leak down test could be advisable, indicating potential underlying issues that may need addressing. Additionally, @mattdren raises a question about the cold start behavior of the engine, further indicating some uncertainties about the vehicle's overall health.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Blizzard340 praised the vehicle as a "Nice survivor!", highlighting its well-preserved condition. The seller, @Lc4dakar, indicates that the DT175 is a one-owner bike with low original mileage, which adds to its appeal as a collectible. The seller emphasizes the bike's untouched nature, claiming it is stock and unaltered, thus preserving its charm as a classic motorcycle.
Neutral: @Lc4dakar provided detailed insights into the vehicle's maintenance history, mentioning the replacement of fork oil, transmission oil, and thorough lubrication of the chain. The seller also suggests that despite being stored for around 20 years, it retains original parts like the tires that still hold air pressure. The seller notes that they have ridden the bike around 20 miles and describes it as fun to ride, although acknowledges having some difficulty keeping up with modern bikes due to being heavier.
Negative: Despite its many positive attributes, @Lc4dakar mentions that the bike's performance suffers due to the seller's excess weight, implying that while the DT175 is enjoyable, it may not compete well against modern motorcycles in terms of speed and agility. Additionally, the seller's reliance on the original tires brings up potential concerns regarding their longevity and safety, despite having held pressure.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight a lot of enthusiasm for the 1965 Shelby Cobra, with @bmchan describing it as 'stunning' and @Hulk2000 praising its 'beautiful color combination' and wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @Petethecarman notes the quality of Unique's Cobra replicas, suggesting that this specific model, especially with its upgraded engine, must provide an exhilarating driving experience, calling it possibly 'scary fast.' The seller, @Prezauto1, emphasizes the car's performance, stating it holds the road well and offers a visceral driving experience, rich in power and character.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in technical discussions about the vehicle's specifications. @Moby65 humorously questions how the vehicle could wear out its rear tires so quickly, while @blpitt00 asks for details about the engine block size. @Leighschu and @e004969 provide information about the car's history, confirming it was built in 1999 and has a 427 FE side-oiler engine bored and stroked to 466 cubic inches. The seller @Prezauto1 also addresses some inquiries about tire replacement due to sizing issues and acknowledges the previous information shared by other users.
Negative: There are some concerns raised, particularly regarding the vehicle's high performance potentially leading to tire wear, as noted by @Moby65. The frequency of Cobra replicas being auctioned is also pointed out by @68Vet, who remarks that this is the fourth side-oiler Cobra replica on the market that week, which may suggest saturation in the market. While mostly positive comments dominate the discussion, such comments could imply a cautious outlook for buyers who may be wary of competition in acquiring similar models.
![]() |
18k-Mile 2006 Ford Mustang Roush Stage 3 Convertible 5-Speed
1ZVFT85H265235362
Lot 209875
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @ImpracticalCarGuy highlights the beauty of the car, while @DKeng emphasizes the fun and excitement of driving it, particularly appreciating the supercharger whine. @Crapton (The Seller) welcomes all bidders, expressing enthusiasm for the vehicle and inviting questions. Overall, the comments reflect a strong admiration for the car's aesthetics and performance, creating an upbeat atmosphere around the listing.
Neutral: @DKeng also provides insightful notes about the vehicle, indicating that it features door panel inserts not typical of Ford stock, suggesting that Roush used similar equipped models as a base. The comments reveal a familiarity with Roush's practices, including specific details about window stickers and hopes for the durability of materials in these models. Additionally, there was a collaborative spirit among the commenters, particularly around correcting the paint color with input from @ImpracticalCarGuy and appreciation expressed by @bringatrailer.
Negative: @reflectorj raises a concern about the shipping of the vehicle, questioning how it can be transported without damaging the bumpers. @DKeng responds with a solution regarding the shipping challenges for lowered cars, indicating that some have to use specialized equipment to accommodate such vehicles, though he stands by the car's stance as it adds to its aesthetic appeal. These exchanges reflect some practical worries regarding transport and usability, contrasting with the overall positive sentiment.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @BMWtiiGuy praises the vehicle, expressing that it is nice. @JessPS appreciates the unique color of the coupe and is glad it is not automatic, reminiscing about their previous ownership of a Z3. @JGraham shares a fun fact about the color's association with James Bond's Z3, highlighting its appeal and fun driving experience, confirming the coupe garners attention wherever it goes. @Keys4Rolex finds the z3 coupe beautiful and expresses a personal desire for an Estoril Blue M Coupe, wishing the seller good luck.
Neutral: @VincentV (The Seller) offers details about the coupe, including its unique monikers, maintenance history, and ownership details, affirming the car's readiness for a road trip after 12 years of ownership. He addresses inquiries related to the car's condition, confirming that the tires are staggered for performance and explaining some minor aspects regarding the car's headlight adjustment and rear tire replacement in 2023. @RodVA notes the reliability of the engine, comparing it favorably to the M Roadster's engine.
Negative: A few comments raise concerns about the car's condition. @bikern8 inquires about potential drivetrain noises, while @Utahjones mentions scuff marks from the license plate bracket and asks for more details about the car's aesthetics and condition, expressing slight apprehension about potential age-related issues like bushings and cooling system overhauls. @VincentV (The Seller) repeatedly reassures observers of the coupe's lack of noises and provides requested photos, but the underlying points suggest a cautious interest from potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @kellyskier85 (The Seller) presents the vehicle as an original survivor in good condition with minor cosmetic rust typical for its age. Several commenters, including @Chalk992911S and @jhabs, compliment the aesthetics, noting the appealing color combination and the 4Runner's overall look. The seller also reassures bidders about the vehicle's performance, stating that the slight "wobble"—which appeared after adding taller tires—has been resolved with wheel balancing, and the test drive video will demonstrate its driving capabilities.
Neutral: Various inquiries about the vehicle's condition surfaced during the comments, with users asking questions about potential smog issues in California and the vehicle's availability for viewing. @NMtoys appreciates the color scheme, while @Mjhenk seeks further clarification on the clutch condition and the nature of the wobble at higher speeds. Additionally, there are requests for further photos, particularly concerning the undercarriage and any rust issues, as well as interest in the absence of operating temperature gauges.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding certain mechanical aspects of the vehicle, with comments from @TimmyCramer questioning the lack of driving videos and requests for evidence of leaks or rust from @jhabs and @Colorado-CarGuy. @dbrimhall expressed trepidation over the ability to drive the vehicle home without issues, given what he learned about the clutch needing replacement. @Flooder also pointed out several malfunctioning items, such as the fuel gauge, expressing a desire for more information on whether any troubleshooting had taken place.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters appreciated the vehicle for its engaging driving experience and overall condition. @SwissMovement noted it as a great starter car for someone looking to enter this market. @GDogg expressed that it's a fun car to drive and noted its good looks. @MazMan shared a similar sentiment, recalling how enjoyable these cars can be to drive. @faba praised the car's responsiveness and described it as one of the better examples available, highlighting the owner's passion for the vehicle and their collection.
Neutral: @DIALEDIN86 inquired about service records and any rust issues, demonstrating a common concern about classic cars. In response, @ShawnAlpina (The Seller) acknowledged the very minimal rust on the 40-year-old vehicle and confirmed that all service records were available in photos. @JMOMOJO asked about the wheels and fitment, indicating interest in modifications compatible with this model. Other comments focused on details regarding the parts and mechanics of the car, such as the shift boot and the odometer.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's odometer, as @Rotors commented on its non-functionality and suggested it could be an easy fix if addressed. @ShawnAlpina (The Seller) explained that the odometer stopped working after a dash replacement and admitted that he had not prioritized its repair. Additionally, @Tabascar questioned the appearance of the passenger side paint, suggesting it looked stained, which could raise potential concerns about the car's exterior condition. Overall, the comments reflect a mixed bag of admiration alongside practical concerns that potential buyers might have.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its beauty and potential for adventure. @cincycarbarn appreciates the truck's aesthetic and inquires about its capability for a long trip, while @Spider_Mike envisions it as a perfect story for a trip to Palmer, Alaska. @boaboyoz emphasizes the truck as a 'black beauty' and hails its tremendous build, indicating strong overall appeal.
Neutral: Comments from @ghammons, the Seller, provide informative insights about the truck, specifically its 428 engine and history. They explain the features of the 428 Cobra Jet and clarify the differences between various engine models. There is also a discussion on aesthetics and upgrades made, such as the aftermarket steering wheel and enhancements from a 1979 donor truck, showcasing the blend of authenticity and added comfort.
Negative: Some comments express mild skepticism or concerns about the vehicle's practicality for long drives. @ghammons mentions that while he believes the truck can make a 3400-mile trip, the 428 engine is not known for its fuel efficiency, especially with 4:11 gears. Others, such as @djwin, point out specific features like the lack of a divorced transfer case, hinting at potential drawbacks or limitations of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the bike's reputation and durability, with @Ontwowheelsaz calling it the "gold standard for touring bikes in this era" and @SonnyAK agreeing that these bikes are built to last. @95_Customs shared a positive experience with the seller, @upon2wheels, noting that he was communicative and helpful during the buying process. Additionally, @eaglemike reminisced about his own experience with a similar bike, highlighting the enjoyable riding experience it provided, which suggests that many believe the bike remains a desirable choice for enthusiasts.
Neutral: The seller, @upon2wheels, provided detailed information regarding the bike's history and maintenance. He mentioned that the bike was acquired from the widow of the original owner and had sat in a garage for several years, emphasizing its clean history and the comprehensive maintenance log available for prospective buyers. He also disclosed some maintenance updates such as new steering bearings and brake pads, although he acknowledged that the tires are old and in need of replacement. There were questions about the bike's frame number from @lubbent and @bluethumb, with the seller confirming uncertainties regarding the assigned frame number but assuring that it doesn't detract from the bike's quality.
Negative: Concerns were raised amongst potential buyers regarding the bike's historical issues, particularly the assigned CA frame number and the lack of clarity about the origin of a frame tag, as highlighted by commenters like @lubbent and @bluethumb. @lubbent indicated that the history of the frame number could be a red flag for collectors, despite the seller's reassurance that it remains a solid choice for riders. Overall, while the bike has much to offer, the unresolved questions about its frame's background may deter some collectors.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg expressed admiration for the Carmine Red color of the Carrera Coupe, noting that he really liked it. @porschepgh412, the seller, echoed this sentiment, stating that he enjoyed both the look and feel of the car. @boaboyoz also praised the vehicle, describing it as a killer Carmine Red 992.1 GTS and complimenting its beautiful build. The seller further highlighted the car's attributes, noting the great build sheet, the aesthetically pleasing Carmine Red with black accents, and the fact that the car is under factory warranty until 6/27 and CPO through 6/29.
Neutral: @Rzncane inquired whether the car had seen any track time, to which @porschepgh412 responded that the car has not been on the track, as that is not an area of interest for him. @SaudiCowboy asked about the remaining lien on the car, showing interest in its financial details. @young_guapa humorously commented about predicting a bid, while @porschepgh412 maintained that the car had been kept in pristine condition, stating it has never been driven in the rain and has full front PPF (paint protection film).
Negative: @porschepgh412 had to correct himself in a previous comment regarding the model, clarifying that it is indeed a 992.1 GTS, indicating a small miscommunication. While comments were largely positive, there was an underlying concern about the lien from @SaudiCowboy, suggesting some buyers might be wary about outstanding financial obligations related to the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mstreitz noted that the vehicle is a great driver after having repaired the fuel system and performed a general engine tune-up. Additionally, they mentioned the installation of new headlights, further enhancing the car's usability and appeal. The fact that @mstreitz has moved the vehicle to a heated hangar indicates a level of care and attention given to its maintenance, suggesting that it has been well looked after.
Neutral: @Alhoffman inquired about the missing flywheel cover, expressing surprise that it had not been addressed since the last auction. This comment indicates an expectation for thoroughness in vehicle preparation and could reflect a concern for completeness when considering the vehicle's overall condition.
Negative: @mstreitz's response to @Alhoffman's concern highlighted that the flywheel cover was not covered, which could be seen as a negative aspect of the vehicle's presentation. This lack of attention to detail might give potential buyers pause, as important parts seem to be overlooked, suggesting possible neglect or oversight in the vehicle's handling.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's long history and care. @EvorICE appreciated the car being an L-82, while @vettesandvipers praised the family ownership. @sdrcp acknowledged the emotional weight of selling the car that's so cherished by @hildog's mother and felt confident the next owner would love it just as much. @Dollycat3 described the car as a wonderful family-owned beauty, reflecting the general sentiment of nostalgia and appreciation for the Corvette's legacy.
Neutral: Several clarifications about the vehicle's location and condition were discussed. @JK_9 raised an important point about the confusion regarding the car's current location, highlighting potential issues with shipping quotes. @hildog (The Seller) confirmed the car resides in Boynton Beach, FL, and promised to rectify the listing details. The comments generally revealed curiosity about various specifics of the car's condition, such as window leaks, air conditioning functionality, and any scratches, with @hildog providing updates on these aspects.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the car's condition, leading to a few doubts among potential bidders. @zelduhsman expressed skepticism regarding the seller's assertion of no nicks or scratches, noticing paint discrepancies around the headlights and driver’s door. This sentiment was echoed by @King60, questioning the seller's claim. Overall, while many commenters retained a positive view of the classic Corvette, some were hesitant to bid due to these potential undisclosed issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a genuine appreciation for the vintage truck, emphasizing the charm of honest old trucks finding new owners regularly. @hairyolds described the truck as nice and praised its great body style, indicating an overall positive sentiment towards its appearance. @BaT acknowledged contributors for pointing out the typo in the specs, showing engagement with the community and commitment to accuracy.
Neutral: There were some inquiries related to the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the missing partial A/C equipment and compressor noted by @dcagauto. This shows that while there is enthusiasm for the truck, potential buyers or enthusiasts are seeking clarity on specific details that could affect its value and usability. Additionally, @vintagevehicle highlighted a potential confusion in the vehicle's specifications, bringing attention to the accuracy of the listing.
Negative: Concerns about the truck needing TLC were expressed by @hairyolds, which indicates that despite its positive features, the vehicle may require some repairs or maintenance to meet buyer expectations. The mention of a possible typo regarding the engine size by @vintagevehicle also suggests that there might be some inconsistencies in the listing that could deter potential buyers. Overall, while the truck appears to be admired, there are issues that could impact its sale.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received high praise from several commenters for its impressive build quality and aesthetic appeal. @Astonman76 noted that it is 'really well done,' with @Cdn043 complimenting its presentation and immaculate condition, highlighting the 'sinister black look' and 'black ghost stripes.' @Toddh03 expressed confidence in the seller's credibility, emphasizing that @dj_walls2424 only offers vehicles in top-notch condition, while @Masonpauls and @Fixu00 also emphasized the vehicle's stunning appearance and understated racing stripe. Overall, many view it as a standout among Cobra replicas.
Neutral: Questions around the vehicle's title and condition have been raised by several commenters. @Jabax3 sought clarity on whether the vehicle is titled as a 1965 model or a kit car, as the 'reconstructed' terminology can be confusing. @DVMS inquired about the tire date codes, while @Ian9000 simply called it a beauty, indicating a mix of admiration and curiosity. The seller, @dj_walls2424, has been responsive in addressing these inquiries, providing details about the title designation and the vehicle's assembly history, aiming to clear up any misunderstandings.
Negative: Some comments pointed out potential concerns regarding the vehicle's safety features and the implications of its 'reconstructed' title. @Astonman76 remarked that if this Cobra aims to perform like a racing car, it should be equipped with modern safety measures, such as a fire suppression system and proper harnesses. While @zues56 described the seller as respectable, there remains a wariness about the overall condition and history of replica vehicles. The mention of needing to consider replacing the tires adds to this cautious sentiment, suggesting that while the vehicle is visually appealing, potential buyers should be mindful of its operational readiness.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GamesterX expressed admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a perfect blend of being show-worthy and practical enough for mud adventures. @Wookie74, the seller, appreciated @GamesterX's positive thoughts on the K5 and shared a fondness for the vehicle, indicating that they would miss it once it was sold. @SimplexFish complimented the K5's condition, noting the uniqueness of the 'deluxe trim' and the appealing design, which includes the desirable power side view mirrors.
Neutral: @Automark inquired about the availability of a hardtop for the Blazer, showing interest in the technical specifications without a clear preference. @ChadHoag also posed a question regarding the compatibility of hardtops from different years, demonstrating an interest in potential modifications and practical ownership concerns. @Jerbo provided a nostalgic comparison to a family Suburban that shared similar features, contributing to the discussion about the vehicle's design and appeal.
Negative: @Prodriver expressed disapproval of the modifications made to the truck, calling it sad to see the vehicle altered, indicating a preference for its original state. @Wookie74 responded to @Prodriver, expressing regret that the vehicle did not meet their tastes but explaining the care and fond memories they amassed while owning the truck since 2017. This highlights a contrast between the seller's sentimental value and the concerns of potential buyers about modifications affecting the truck's character.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments from potential buyers demonstrate genuine interest in the Porsche 911 being sold by @kentlundgren for his father-in-law. @Mithril911 complimented the father-in-law's decision to own not just one, but two Porsches, acknowledging the joy it must have brought him. Additionally, @GDogg praised the car's appearance with a positive remark, emphasizing that it is a good-looking vehicle. Other bidders, like @alvinaguirre, expressed enthusiasm about possibly continuing the ownership of the car, indicating a strong community interest in this vehicle's history and care.
Neutral: @kentlundgren, the seller, provided detailed responses to inquiries about the vehicle, including clarifications about its special features like the Sycamore Package, the incident that led to paint and bodywork in September 2015, and the condition of the car's infotainment system. While @canine64 sought more documents related to past repairs, @rolfn mentioned an estimated shipping cost to LA, indicating logistical concerns of potential buyers. In response to questions about the IMS bearing, @kentlundgren confirmed it has not been replaced but reassured interested parties of the car's overall health, noting it has never been redlined or tracked.
Negative: However, there were some concerns raised about the car's condition. @strat61 pointed out a potential issue with the infotainment system's touchscreen display, which @kentlundgren confirmed had corroded and rendered the system inoperable. Moreover, questions from @70GTO455HO and @KO27 regarding the IMS bearing reflected a seller's concern regarding its replacement status. The acknowledgment that the car had experienced an incident in 2015 also raised worries for bidders who want assurance on the vehicle’s past damages. Overall, while there are positive sentiments, the vehicle's issues and incomplete service records created some skepticism and required clarifications from the seller.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the appealing aesthetics of the M5, with @RiskySearch commenting on its lovely appearance and @mr_carlover praising its beauty and options. Many users are interested in the car and eager to see more video content showcasing its performance, with multiple requests from @offroadyoda and @janman2000 for driving and cold start videos. Overall, there's a sense of admiration for the vehicle's design and function among several prospective buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters have raised questions regarding the vehicle's history and maintenance, including inquiries from @AsadKhan about service records and specific components like the rod bearings. @MrDannyrad, the owner of the car, clarified that no extra fees will be charged to the buyer even if the registration is partially due. Additionally, @shickp55 (The Seller) has attempted to address concerns about the car's paint and service history, including the availability of service records, and confirmed that a smog certificate will be provided prior to delivery, ensuring compliance for local buyers.
Negative: Concerns have been noted about the vehicle's condition and history, with @AsadKhan questioning the appearance of the rear end of the vehicle, leading to doubts about any paint work being done. @Datzun expressed worries about the registration being past due, while @arnavvr highlighted a lack of maintenance records prior to 2022, creating uncertainty about the car's upkeep. Some comments also indicate skepticism regarding the quality of video recordings, with @janman2000 and @M3at_heads joking about the video's poor quality, which does not instill confidence in the vehicle presentation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @kinglaw comments positively about the vehicle, noting its sharp appearance and the upgraded 1988 wheels that enhance the look and tire availability. He expresses particular appreciation for the aesthetic improvements the sawblade wheels provide, indicating they greatly enhance the vehicle's appeal. Additionally, @Zartan0618 also shares enthusiasm, predicting that someone will walk away with a beautiful C4 at the end of the auction.
Neutral: @rlpazmino (The Seller) addresses @kinglaw's questions about the vehicle's details and clarifies potential discrepancies in the antenna's extension. The Seller mentions that the car was inherited from an uncle who took excellent care of it and kept it well-guarded in a garage. @GTO400fourspeed inquires about the condition of the rims and seeks specific images to assess wear, while @NordicDave requests a picture of the illuminated dash panel, which the Seller subsequently provides.
Negative: @kinglaw raises concerns regarding the wheels' offset, which could affect the vehicle's geometry, and points out that the automatic antenna could be malfunctioning if it's extended while the car is off, posing a potential battery drain issue. The Seller does not express any serious issues with the vehicle but acknowledges the necessity of clarifying the details that potential buyers are interested in.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Valiantjim describes the Ramcharger as a rare and desirable model, noting its attractive features like the 4-speed OD transmission and unique 2wd configuration. He appreciates its solid and rust-free condition, mentioning potential upgrades like the optional 360 engine. @BobbyARiner (The Seller) shares his personal connection to the vehicle, detailing its history and the numerous compliments he has received on its appearance and performance. He emphasizes that the truck runs great and has been well maintained, highlighting its refinished interior and recently added wheels and tires.
Neutral: @BobbyARiner (The Seller) provides a thorough account of the vehicle's specifications, including the non-functioning speedometer and odometer. He notes the previous owner's estimate of around 115-120,000 miles, while being transparent about the uncertainty of that figure. The seller also mentions the presence of original wheels and tires that will be included in the sale, along with the fact that the truck has been a weekend cruiser.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about the vehicle's non-functioning gauges, specifically the speedometer, odometer, and trip gauges. @BobbyARiner (The Seller) acknowledges that while these instruments do not work, other critical gauges like oil pressure and coolant are functioning properly. Additionally, he notes a slight issue with the tire rubbing against the fender well, although he clarifies that it only affects a small area of trim and not the fender itself.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors praised the vehicle's appearance and handling, with @M555 noting that it looks nice for its mileage and emphasizing the importance of the AC. @TomLU86 complimented the car's great handling and driving experience, calling it a real BMW worth enjoying on the road. @Jakec860 expressed admiration for the car's beautiful OEM color, describing it as the best by any manufacturer and conveying a sense of awe for its aesthetic.
Neutral: @VMI1993, the seller, provided clarifications about the vehicle, stating it has the original M42 engine and explaining the issues related to the A/C system—specifically that the controller isn't activating it. Additionally, the seller mentioned that the transmission was replaced due to previously experiencing sloppy shifting. The seller also confirmed that the spare tire and jack hardware are included in the car.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the AC functionality, with @srallen and @M555 questioning what repairs are needed for the AC to work properly. @gphollywood pointed out a possible discrepancy in the vehicle's description, inquiring about the engine type, while @besi asked about the headliner condition and requested additional pictures. Overall, while many commented positively about the vehicle, there were notable queries and concerns regarding various functional aspects.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect high praise for the vehicle, with @GDogg welcoming the stunning Eldo Convertible back and @carfan1978 noting the excellent condition of the steering wheel despite its age, suggesting it has been well taken care of. The seller, @southsideimports, confirmed that the steering wheel is indeed in mint condition, attributing it to the car being garage-kept. Furthermore, @southsideimports highlights that the AC in the car works beautifully, providing consistent cold air even in the heat of Miami, and reassures potential buyers of the vehicle's overall excellent running condition after thorough maintenance has been completed since purchase.
Neutral: Several inquiries regarding the vehicle provide an interesting perspective. @pdavid2 asked about the absence of pictures for the parade boot and soft boot, raising concerns about their fit, to which @southsideimports responded that there are no issues with them and planned to share photos. Questions from @Erikjones4 and @DocMGL about the functionality of the A/C and a potential driving video were met with affirmations of the A/C's performance but indicate a desire for more transparency around vehicle features. Meanwhile, confusion arose over the upholstery, with @jwbmbh pointing out the original leather versus the listing description of 'Red Vinyl Upholstery.'
Negative: Some comments reveal minor concerns about the car's condition and aspects that could enhance the listing. @autodoc inquired about the visors and later asked about the power antenna, illustrating some oversight regarding the specifics of the accessories included. @Mr-Chaney raised a question about the left rear tail light trim, which suggests there may be cosmetic details needing clarification. Additionally, the original description stating vinyl upholstery has caused some confusion, as not everyone agrees on the material. While these issues do not significantly detract from the car's overall appeal, they highlight areas for improvement in communication from the seller.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @39mercman compliments the vehicle's appealing orange paint and finds the interior reminiscent of a 50/50 creamsicle bar, which he amusingly states makes him hungry. @MarkNeely praises the clean state of the pickup and expresses enthusiasm for the auction, wishing the seller good luck in achieving their desired price. @seahare adds to the positive remarks by reinforcing that orange is a fantastic color for the vehicle, extending their best wishes for the sale.
Neutral: @Muttsydog1 inquires about the interior fabrics of the vehicle, seeking confirmation on the materials listed on an invoice, specifically mentioning suede and leather. @newcarpro makes a casual remark about the upcoming Halloween season, which is not directly related to the vehicle but may imply it suits the festive color theme. @six5gto asks specific technical questions about the gas tank location and emergency brake components, indicating an interest in the vehicle's functionality and any modifications.
Negative: @ROD238 (The Seller) shares personal circumstances that have led to the sale of the car collection, indicating a tragic background but also highlighting the truck's good running condition and sporty performance. While mostly positive, there are hints of underlying issues discussed by @six5gto regarding potential modifications to the vehicle's emergency brake system, suggesting areas of concern that may need addressing. @LesJohn comments on the extensive documentation provided with the auction, implying that there may be more paperwork than vehicle, which could raise questions about the vehicle's state.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters generally express high admiration for the vehicle, with @G.O.G.B. stating it's 'too cool not to drive' and @Buhwana calling it 'the most beautiful car ever built'. @GDogg agrees, referring to it as 'absolutely stunning', emphasizing its aesthetic appeal. Additionally, @DB6 praises the China Clay color, further highlighting the car's visual charm.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about the vehicle's history and servicing details. @Jeffglen and @SeaTacTom both question the reason for selling the car so soon after purchase. @TheAston seeks clarification on the servicing status while @gormally (The Seller) explains the reasons behind not servicing it yet. He provides insight into the car's maintenance needs, which include a one-year dormant service that the car hasn't undergone yet due to its low mileage.
Negative: There are some criticisms regarding the vehicle's presentation and necessity for servicing. @PDXBryan and @THenry point out that the photography used does not do justice to the car, suggesting it detracts from its appeal. @OptOn complains that the front plate mount interferes with the vehicle's aesthetics, while @thatkidfromjersey comments on the wisdom of allowing an 18-year-old to drive such a powerful car, reflecting concerns about safety and responsibility.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The Airstream Lounge is being praised for its excellent mechanical condition and high maintenance standards, as highlighted by @Raffi (The Seller). He notes that the vehicle comes with complete service records and recent upgrades such as new tires and a solar power system worth $20k. The presence of features like a combined bath unit with a shower, multiple seatbelts for safe travel, and various internal provisions adds to its appeal. @Raffi has also provided helpful video walkthroughs that showcase both the interior and exterior of the vehicle, demonstrating its capabilities and features.
Neutral: There are discussions about the seating arrangements and towing capabilities of the Airstream Lounge, with several commenters including @Mduffm, @HijoDeAlejandro, and @CarsandDogs bringing up related questions. @Raffi responds by confirming the vehicle has four main forward-facing seats with seatbelts, as well as additional space in the rear. Towing capacity has been clarified to be 6,400 lbs by @Raffi, although others question the specifics and suggest that the actual towing limit can depend on the vehicle's loaded weight and configuration.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the actual number of seatbelts present in the vehicle, with @Mduffm noting that there should be a total of seven based on previous models. @ShiftHappens asked about the presence of seatbelts in all seats, which @Raffi confirmed, but with some limitations. Additionally, some skepticism arose regarding the claimed towing capacity, with commenters like @GXguy470 and @CarsandDogs discussing discrepancies in the capacity ratings from different model years which may cause confusion among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle, highlighting its unique wedge shape and convertible design, which is especially appealing for top-down cruising. @Axletwister praised the TR7 as a fun British classic, and @bodhi1601 shared fond memories of owning both the TR7 and TR8, noting the excellent handling and balance of the car. Overall, there is a sense of nostalgia and admiration for the model, with remarks about its fun driving experience. @Gary_T1 reflected on his enjoyment of an earlier model, indicating that this vehicle might also provide a great driving experience.
Neutral: Several comments addressed practical concerns regarding the vehicle's smog compliance, especially from @kmharrop who is located in California and mentioned the importance of passing smog tests in his state. @sliproc provided detailed insight into the missing smog equipment and commented on the potential concern for buyers in smog-regulated states. Other commenters noted the importance of the vehicle's operational status over aesthetic concerns, leading to a balanced discussion about the condition and requirements of the car.
Negative: However, there were also negative sentiments, particularly expressed by @kmharrop who seemed dissatisfied with the vehicle's lack of parts necessary for passing smog tests, which led him to question its suitability for California. @19Willys46 echoed this concern, implying that the focus on smog issues overshadowed other important discussions about the car's condition. Additionally, @flyingdago remarked on the frustration of prioritizing regulatory compliance over the vehicle's performance and appeal, indicating that these regulations can detract from the enjoyment of classic cars.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express excitement about the vehicle's potential for adventure, with @neilpierson25 suggesting it’s perfect for a road trip. @FyfeAvon1 is eager about the vehicle's cruising capabilities and remarks on its off-road potential, while @kylepb (The Seller) reassures prospective buyers regarding the vehicle's durability and the power steering enhancements, stating that it could travel comfortably around 40-50 mph on standard roads. Furthermore, the versatility of the HMMWV is highlighted as an excellent tailgating setup and great for camping due to its adaptable bed area.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Lurch_Camaro and @FyfeAvon1, seek clarification on specific mechanical details. @kylepb (The Seller) notes the minor oil leak observed when running, which is typical for military vehicles, and addresses the turn signal issue that may require a simple fix. Commenters also inquire about the fuel tank capacity and mileage, to which @kylepb responds with specific figures, demonstrating that the vehicle offers a functional operating range despite its rugged nature.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle’s condition are raised, especially related to existing faults like the oil drip and intermittent turn signals mentioned by @Lurch_Camaro. @Boomer54 questions the feasibility of fixing a dent on the rear, indicating the vehicle may require some additional repairs. @FyfeAvon1 humorously raises doubts about the ride comfort while driving long distances, hinting at possible discomfort during travel, while others, including @Plflyman, express hesitance about its speed capabilities on highways.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @westhills10 (The Seller) expresses excitement about listing the G63, highlighting the vehicle as a perfect blend of luxury and power. The seller has taken thorough measures to provide detailed pictures and descriptions, encouraging potential bidders to ask questions. The seller emphasizes a commitment to transparency and reassures prospective buyers about the vehicle's quality, mentioning that it is free from smoke and foul odors, as well as dog hairs, thus presenting it as a well-maintained and clean option.
Neutral: @RM1337 inquires about the lien holder and amount, which @westhills10 clarifies is Bank of America. @khalisa expresses concern about the seller's quick turnover of the vehicle, questioning if there are any underlying issues. The seller responds by inviting confidence, suggesting that sometimes sellers move on from vehicles for various reasons beyond the car's condition. @4Gus and @GerardoA ask relevant questions about the vehicle's previous ownership, including smoking history and test drive availability, and the seller provides positive confirmations that enhance buyer confidence.
Negative: @khalisa's comment reflects suspicion regarding the short duration of ownership and implies potential issues that could influence a buyer's perception negatively. This concern is common in automotive transactions, particularly for high-value vehicles like the G63, where buyers may question the seller's motives in reselling a car shortly after purchase. Negative sentiments regarding quick sales can overshadow otherwise positive attributes of the vehicle, especially if prospective buyers feel uncertain about its reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @aegmotorsports describes the 2015 Mercedes Benz W205 C400 4MATIC as a gorgeous vehicle featuring various luxury components such as a multimedia package, AMG styling, and a powerful 3.0L V6 engine. Commenters have noted the strong performance of the motor and expressed admiration for its spirited drive, with @bat reminiscing about how much they used to negotiate reserves in auctions, indicating a positive sentiment towards the vehicle's value and desirability.
Neutral: @aegmotorsports has provided detailed information about the vehicle's specifications and features, which include everything from factory literature to a reproduction window sticker. @mamico inquired about the undercarriage of the car, to which @aegmotorsports promptly confirmed there is no damage and directed the commenter to the relevant photos for clarity. The seller has made it clear that this is a No Reserve auction and has invited potential buyers to reach out for additional information, including shipping quotes.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the undercarriage of the vehicle, with @mamico questioning its condition. While @aegmotorsports assured potential buyers that the undercarriage is undamaged, such inquiries may suggest some apprehension among prospective buyers about hidden issues. Additionally, comments about the flickering seen in video footage of the vehicle's instrument cluster indicate some technical concerns, though @aegmotorsports has clarified that this is a camera effect, not an actual malfunction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic and build quality. @mallenbiker described the vehicle as a 'gorgeous build', echoing the sentiments of @Alpine-01 who found it 'breathtaking'. @JagRRR praised its beauty and complimented the craftsmanship, while @WNGD appreciated the tasteful design choices, noting that it avoided the glaring 'red over red over red interior' often seen in such models. Overall, the visuals and custom features of the car received strong positive feedback from multiple users.
Neutral: The seller, @Kennyjgt4, provided detailed responses to inquiries, indicating that the vehicle is still using original break-in motor oil and confirmed that the air conditioning works. He mentioned that he can provide further documentation and pictures upon request, including details about the frame and other aspects of the build. It's clear that there is significant interest in specifics about the vehicle's features, historical background, and current condition, as many users asked for additional information.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, some users raised concerns. @BartND pointed out that the driving and engine videos weren't particularly convincing and suggested that clearer evidence of the car's performance would help bolster the seller's claims. @tnt1967 expressed disappointment that the vehicle had low mileage, noting the builder's passing, which may have prevented more thorough enjoyment of the car. Moreover, several comments hint at frustration with the seller's response time and issues related to contacting him, indicating a need for clearer communication in the sale process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @CRUSH appreciates the vehicle by highlighting its clean condition, mentioning it has only had two owners and a natural undercarriage. @GoPokes expresses admiration for the vehicle, simply stating that it is a nice Tacoma. @Msiclari6 (The Seller) thanks commenters for their positive remarks and offers to promptly answer any questions about the vehicle.
Neutral: @Msiclari6 (The Seller) engages with the audience by inviting them to ask any questions they might have and reassures them of prompt responses. The seller acknowledges that they are halfway through the auction and is appreciative of the ongoing support from commenters.
Negative: @nexttime raises a potential concern regarding the vehicle's theft history, asking for more details. @MeatheadMillionaire expresses a desire for the vehicle to be a crew cab, implying that it does not meet his expectations for what he is looking for.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bmyers5525 expresses a strong admiration for the vehicle, calling it a 'mint' 1991 SE and highlighting its appeal as a peak Honda, indicating that it will be loved by its next owner. @Hondablink shares a nostalgic appreciation for the car's design, particularly the absence of a wing and the coupe taillight setup. @Qspec speaks to the rarity of this generation of Accord, especially in good condition with low mileage, showing respect for the family selling it and hoping it goes to someone who cherishes its originality.
Neutral: @johnclementsavage seeks information about the timing belt replacement, which could be an important maintenance concern. Additionally, @Maddie1175 inquires about the air conditioner functionality, indicating a common interest in the vehicle's mechanical state. @patel asks about any rust issues beyond a specific hole, showing a cautious interest in the car's condition.
Negative: @thevintagehondaguy corrects @classichondaman regarding the best-selling cars of 1992, possibly implying that there may be misconceptions about the vehicle's historical significance. @Insight (The Seller) acknowledges the original timing belt, which could raise concerns about overdue maintenance. Overall, there is a hint of apprehension among some commenters about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding its mechanical components like the timing belt and rust spots.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ericmailaender (The Seller) shared his love for the bike, indicating that it is one of the best motorcycles he has owned and that he has invested significantly into its upgrades, such as the K&N filters and Lafranconi exhaust, enhancing its performance and sound. Commenters like @66Malibu and @Turin appreciated the aesthetic upgrades made to the bike, including the larger front headlight and high-quality leather seat, which both enhance the vintage appeal of the motorcycle. Additionally, @flyingdago praised the bike's beautiful Italian design and its handling, particularly remarking on the torque and ride experience it offers.
Neutral: Comments from @Certv2 and @Northwester raised questions about the engine performance and potential issues, such as roughness when cold and the integrity of oil seals. @ericmailaender addressed these inquiries, clarifying that while there is a small oil 'weep' from the main pan, no significant leaks or issues were noted pertaining to the gearbox or final drive. He reassured potential buyers that minor adjustments and maintenance have been kept up, thanks to trusted mechanics who specialize in vintage bikes, which offers a balance of concern and confidence about the motorcycle's overall condition.
Negative: Some comments expressed skepticism about the bike's condition. @Certv2 questioned the implications of engine roughness, suggesting it could indicate more significant issues such as worn con rod bearings. @Northwester's inquiries about oil leaks pointed to potential concerns that can arise with older motorcycles, prompting @ericmailaender to confirm the existence of a minor leak. Despite @sdcr's input about tightening the oil pan, the conversation hinted at possible ongoing maintenance needs that could be a deterrent for prospective buyers looking for a worry-free vintage motorcycle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @johnjm comments on the vehicle's impressive aesthetics, noting that while the 600s are quite large for an Isetta, the modifications to its greenhouse contribute to a more modern appearance. @luckylarryj provides interesting historical context, mentioning the rarity of the model with only 34,000 two-door versions produced during its two years of production. @BBBOB shares a personal experience of driving a similar Isetta, which adds a layer of engagement with the vehicle's history and character.
Neutral: @TommyBruin raises a practical concern regarding the vehicle's exposure to road salt and winter conditions, showing a level of caution that potential buyers may appreciate. In response, @PierceArrow reassures that the vehicle has always been stored in a heated garage during winter, highlighting its well-maintained condition. Additionally, @PierceArrow indicates plans to upload driving videos as the auction approaches, which may help potential buyers visualize the vehicle's performance.
Negative: There are no explicit negative comments regarding the vehicle; however, @TommyBruin's inquiry about road salt may imply concerns about potential rust or damage associated with harsh winter conditions. The absence of other negative feedback suggests that overall sentiment might be favorable, but it hints at cautious consideration from potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Fluxcap (The Seller) confirmed that the glass wind deflector is fully operational, and they have provided a video demonstrating it in action. The vehicle is described as having been well taken care of, with a clean history and no accidents according to CarFax. The convertible top is original and intact, further enhancing its appeal as a potential gift. The seller expresses confidence in the vehicle's condition, suggesting it runs well and requires no additional work.
Neutral: There are comments questioning the TFT display replacement and concerns about whether it functions correctly. @Bob_MX5 raises issues regarding display issues that can arise in Audis and suggests the need for proprietary VAG-COM readings to ensure all vehicle codes are recognized. @chasstevens inquires about documentation for the timing belt replacement, whereas the seller admits uncertainty about the source of the TFT but conveys trust in the previous owner regarding maintenance.
Negative: @Bob_MX5 expresses skepticism about the TFT display's functionality, stating that a red background indicates failure and emphasizing the importance of using specialized code readers for accurate diagnostics. They reference previous auctions where similar cars showed display failures, indicating potential issues with the instrument cluster. There is a general air of caution surrounding the vehicle's tech reliability, highlighting that without proper documentation or verifiable scans by a dealer, buyers may feel uneasy.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Triumphcubguy provided an enthusiastic overview of the 1978 Yamaha YZ 125, highlighting its nearly original condition, first kick starts, smooth gear shifts, and several replaced components that ensure its functionality. Commenters like @AZGT350 expressed nostalgia, reminiscing about their own experiences with the bike, describing it as a lightweight and fun ride, while @tjoseph2000 appreciated the bike as a learning tool for mechanical skills and a chance to enjoy a piece of history. Others, such as @HBM0302, shared their fond memories of racing similar models, indicating the bike's impact on their youth and the excitement it brought.
Neutral: Some comments provided historical context about the competitiveness of the 1978 Yamaha YZ 125 among its peers, with @OldGuy and @kcm125 debating its place against other manufacturers like Suzuki and Honda at the time. The YZ 125 was regarded as a strong competitor, with @kcm125 sharing insights on its technical attributes and the evolution of off-road bike technology over the years. Commenters expressed varying levels of admiration without definitive endorsements, reflecting on the bike's legacy and mechanics from a retrospective perspective.
Negative: Despite the overall positivity, a few commentators mentioned challenges associated with the YZ 125. @Blizzard340 recalled his difficulties with repairs when owning the bike, mainly due to the expense of fixing the mono-shock. @motomike42 lamented the challenges of keeping the bike's power band optimal, hinting at the complexities of riding 125 MX bikes from that era, particularly for novice riders. This nostalgia was tinged with the reality of the technical demands that early motocross bikes placed on their riders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @MateoGamarra has received numerous compliments about the vehicle's overall quality and performance, with comments praising the solid setup and impressive condition for its age. @ElDorado54 particularly noted the smooth shifting of the vehicle and its quiet engine, highlighting that the truck is impressive given its mileage. Additionally, @Thatsagreatride and @wngrog both expressed enthusiasm for the Land Cruiser, reinforcing the positive reception from potential buyers.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding specific details about the vehicle, including the condition of the hood, rust above the windshield, and the functionality of certain features like the exhaust system and cruise control. @gabesor asked about repair estimates for the rust, while @Southsidewaterman and @Chriszark sought clarification on possible repairs and vehicle parts. These queries reflect a genuine interest in understanding the vehicle’s condition and operational capabilities, and @MateoGamarra responded helpfully, providing details about the truck's mechanical history and maintenance.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about potential issues related to the hitch and rust present on the vehicle, particularly around the windshield. @shanko pointed out the risk of injury from the protruding hitch, while @gabesor's questions about rust repair indicate a need for potential future work. Furthermore, @Kscott1 brought up concerns regarding emissions and whether the truck’s exhaust setup meets regulatory standards, suggesting caution for prospective buyers regarding the vehicle's compliance with local regulations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Mikeybob4566 shared a fond memory of owning a similar 1988 model, highlighting its reliability and fun driving experience. They expressed nostalgia and a desire to own it again. @HAPPY emphasized the car's iconic status in the late 80s and early 90s, noting how it represented a kind of urban prestige, especially in places like Brooklyn or Queens. Lastly, @7257scottt shared their enjoyable experience with an earlier model, praising its driving pleasure and reliability, indicating that this Thunderbird will bring happiness to its new owner.
Neutral: @Longmire45 expressed sympathy to @Jgrabberg (The Seller) for their brother's loss and recalled their own positive experience with the Thunderbird. Other commenters, like @Vanderhawk and @Dan1500, raised practical questions about the car’s condition, including corrosion and tire integrity, which @Jgrabberg addressed adequately, confirming no paintwork had been done and the car was kept in good condition. They also reassured @Vanderhawk that all electronic components, including the AC and heating system, were functional.
Negative: @Vanderhawk noted some corrosion in the underhood pictures, which raised concerns about whether the vehicle was well cared for, especially given its claimed low mileage. @Classickcarbuyer expressed caution regarding the front bumper's condition and possible over buffing, indicating a need for attention to detail. Overall, while the vehicle has received much praise for its nostalgic value and enjoyment, some comments reflect wariness about its physical condition and maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's modifications and overall appeal. @kronus noted the well-executed driveline and suspension swap, highlighting the car's potential for thrill with its racy specifications. @StewpidStew appreciated the quality of the build, pointing out that it seemed like a desirable project car already set up nicely, while @getouth agreed that buying a car like this would be more cost-effective than building one from scratch. The interactions indicated an excitement for the driving experience, with @Mikecweber4 (The Seller) affirming the fun nature of the vehicle, as it draws attention and admiration on the road.
Neutral: Many comments were focused on requesting specific information about the vehicle's condition and history. @leokeating and @ssr21 asked about important systems like the air conditioning, asking for operational status and whether there were any issues. @JustAManWantingACar raised questions about the car's history, including an inquiry about the VIN tags and accident reports, while also suggesting that it would help to have more detailed photos uploaded. Responses from @Mikecweber4 (The Seller) provided insights into the car's details, including the existence and status of various components, which seemed to satisfy some respondents.
Negative: However, there were several critical remarks regarding the vehicle, particularly concerning its mechanical integrity. @mynameistimo criticized the questionable practice of up-badging the vehicle without appropriate modifications to match the claimed power. Concerns were raised about the check engine light, with @SilverStateNV and others highlighting unresolved issues like the O2 sensor fault and the missing air conditioning components. @JustAManWantingACar even commented on a potential alignment issue caused by the camber plate discrepancies, driving home concerns about the car's handling and setup for track use, which were echoed by various commentators who were skeptical about the vehicle's performance under real-world conditions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @dmose expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's features, noting that it has some neat additions. @rexfox highlighted the appealing combination of a 302 engine, a 4-speed transmission, and air conditioning, indicating that these features make the vehicle very desirable. Overall, these comments reflect a positive impression of the Bronco's capabilities and attributes.
Neutral: @CDehne humorously suggested perhaps including a spare tire as an additional feature, showing a lighthearted take on the vehicle's readiness. @cstoudt, the seller, offered to answer any questions potential buyers might have, which indicates a willingness to engage with interested parties and ensure they have all the information they need.
Negative: @DirtMod raised a question about the vehicle's history, mentioning having seen the Bronco driving slowly on a freeway in California, which could imply concerns about its condition or performance. This comment suggests that there may be some lingering doubts about the vehicle's past usage.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @RogerD noted that the vehicle appears to be a clean and solid classic, mentioning its potential for restoration on the windshield ding. @High_Hope expressed admiration for the car, calling it a wonderful cruiser, while @Frank_Barrett shared a fond memory of owning a similar model for 33 years and painted the car as a fun and reliable choice. @Dentalfa1 reminisced about their first car, highlighting the car's nostalgic appeal and fun driving experience. The seller, @exoticcarconnections, also pointed out the extensive restoration work done on the vehicle, emphasizing its excellent mechanical and cosmetic condition since joining their collection.
Neutral: Many comments indicated a desire for more information about the vehicle's history and condition. @jeremynichols requested additional pictures of the car with the top down and behind the seats, echoing a few other users with similar requests. @jlglackin and @19Willys46 raised concerns about the low mileage recorded since the vehicle's purchase, and @footer73 commented that while the exterior looks refreshed, the interior could use some attention, particularly the seat foam. The seller attempted to address these inquiries and noted they would provide more pictures and information moving forward.
Negative: Several commenters expressed concerns regarding the condition and details of the vehicle. @Footer73 mentioned the need for better attention to the interior and noted that the engine compartment had not been repainted. @Pinoli highlighted an issue with the transmission popping out of reverse during the driving video, which had been noted by others, including @okie_flats and @Jimbo2300S, reflecting an underlying mechanical issue. Additionally, @ecdy criticized the lack of thoroughness in the restoration, specifically regarding the condition of the undercarriage, while @landy442 questioned the low mileage accumulated over the years and the lack of maintenance records.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its excellent build quality and overall appeal. @GreenvilleSteve praised the model as one of the best from 1998 to 2002, mentioning their own satisfaction with a similar vehicle. @mfontaine2008 also shared their happiness with the color and condition of their own Land Cruiser, while @DUGEEEFRESH04 and @Thatsagreatride complimented the setup and build of the truck. The seller, @carguy176, also highlighted the vehicle's impressive maintenance record and the inclusion of original OEM parts as added value for potential buyers.
Neutral: The seller provided detailed information about the vehicle's history and condition, addressing specific inquiries from interested buyers. @Gh0stSpeed asked about potential issues, to which @carguy176 confirmed there were no rust problems, as the vehicle had always been in California and stored indoors. The seller also responded to questions about paint blemishes, the non-operational sunroof, and the suspension setup, indicating that the vehicle was well-maintained with numerous recent updates. Others mentioned the common issue with sunroofs in Land Cruisers, with comments from @OlyPen echoing similar experiences.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about specific issues with the vehicle, particularly regarding the sunroof's functionality. @Gh0stSpeed and @vonntastic asked for clarification on the sunroof problem, which @carguy176 described as being in a fixed position and non-leaking, while unsure of the exact cause. Additionally, @rpjayhawk pointed out a noise in the driving videos that he found troubling, although @carguy176 reassured that it was likely due to the recording environment. The seller acknowledged that the car is an older model with potential quirks typical of vehicles from that era, but he aimed to address all inquiries transparently.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg and @boaboyoz both praised the vehicle, highlighting its great appearance and well-maintained condition. They acknowledge it as a stunning example of a 2019 Porsche 911 Turbo S Cabriolet. @69_911e added a humorous note about the power of the new hybrid Turbo S, calling this vehicle a boulevard cruiser in comparison, but still acknowledged its impressive performance.
Neutral: @surfer55 raised questions about the ownership history and the lack of Turbo S badging, prompting a response from @CardiffClassics who clarified the ownership timeline and reassured that the car has been well serviced. This interaction helped clear up any confusion regarding the vehicle's maintenance and features. Additionally, @taievoli inquired about paint condition and protective film, which @CardiffClassics addressed thoroughly, indicating no paint work was done and confirming the use of PPF on the hood and front fenders.
Negative: @dwspen01 and @milhouse34 expressed concerns over the replaced seatbelts and powder-coated wheels, asking for clarification on these modifications. @CardiffClassics responded that the changes were made for aesthetic reasons with no damage involved, which somewhat alleviates the concerns. However, these initial questions indicate skepticism about the vehicle's condition and history, reflecting some apprehension from potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @oldschoolin (The Seller) noted that the vehicle is not just for kids; adults can ride them too, similar to other Honda mini models. They emphasized their enjoyment by mentioning how they have had it on display for 10 years, considering it a piece of art. @oldschoolin (The Seller) also shared that the vehicle garners a lot of attention at shows, reinforcing its aesthetic appeal and collectible status.
Neutral: @PopeyeW inquired whether the vehicle is sized for kids or adults, reflecting a common curiosity about the intended demographic for such mini vehicles. This suggests that potential buyers may recognize their versatility, as adults are equally interested in riding these models. Additionally, @natew51 expressed that their wants and needs regarding all-terrain cycles have blurred, indicating a broader interest in owning such vehicles for various purposes beyond just functionality, including artistic appreciation.
Negative: There were no significant negative comments regarding the vehicle itself. The discussions primarily focused on the size, purpose, and enjoyment of the vehicle, with no critical feedback about its performance or quality, suggesting overall satisfaction with the product.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its unique color combination and overall condition. @pvivax described it as a "good honest car" and beautiful, wishing luck for the sale. @valiantjim shared a personal story related to the car model, evoking nostalgia and fond memories. @johnammond praised the seller's honesty in the listing, expressing a desire to purchase the car sight unseen, while @justinMI complimented the ad and the car's stunning appearance, reminiscing about their own past car experiences.
Neutral: The seller, @Alfa32, acknowledged the car’s history and condition, mentioning its original parts and a modest driving history since purchase. They provided detailed information about the vehicle's specifications, emphasizing that it is not a show car but a solid example of its kind that could attract attention at local events. Several comments also mentioned the technical aspects, including the engine configuration and drivetrain performance, with @oldcrow clarifying the specifications related to the car's camshaft.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about specific aspects of the car. @6t6goat mentioned discomfort regarding the pictures of the undercarriage, indicating that it could need improvements for show purposes. Additionally, there was a comment from @davetona expressing that the car is categorized as a "survivor-type," which implies it might require some work to reach its full potential. Although there were critical observations, they did not detract significantly from the overall positive sentiment about the car and its history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the seller's responsiveness and willingness to provide detailed information about the vehicle. @Ryan32987 (The Seller) promptly answers inquiries, confirming that the bike functions well and that they are uploading running videos to demonstrate its condition. Furthermore, he acknowledges questions about the vehicle's components, such as confirming the presence of drain holes in the frame base and providing clarification on the exhaust system.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle reflect an interest in its practicality, with potential buyers asking about specific aspects like shipment costs and the inclusion of parts like a muffler. @ozinus raises concerns regarding the shipping fees to Massachusetts and the absence of a left rear view mirror, suggesting they want to ensure they have all necessary details before proceeding. @tsumm1 seeks clarification on the engine's maintenance and mileage, indicating a desire for transparency and thoroughness in the sale process.
Negative: There are some concerns expressed regarding the vehicle's condition and shipping logistics. @ozinus points out the high cost of shipping, which could deter potential buyers, while also mentioning missing components like the left rear view mirror, implying that the bike may not be fully equipped as expected. Additionally, @lar's question about the absence of a muffler reflects a concern about the vehicle’s performance and legality, which could impact a buyer's interest.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Segura911 noted that the car is beautiful and has been well-maintained, expressing excitement for the 996 season. The seller, @Carrara996, confirmed the car's originality, stating there is no non-original paintwork, and expressed confidence in its abilities. @radcrujones described it as an absolute beauty and @jurita admired the tasteful color combination of white on gray, praising the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle.
Neutral: @dg463 inquired about the seller’s reason for selling the car after a short ownership period, while @URS6 appreciated the seller's clear responses regarding the IMS solution question. The seller, @Carrara996, admitted having limited service records but reassured potential buyers of the car's soundness. Additionally, @klisenko raised a question regarding an apparent discrepancy in the cold start video, to which the seller acknowledged a mistake in posting.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @ThreatHunter, questioning the number of previous owners, while @Rsy505 and @Segura911 pointed out issues with the stereo system not being flushed and its display malfunctioning. @buddalun listed some minor niggles after viewing the car, including the need for radio attention, a dent on the door, and the cigarette lighter plug not working. The seller, @Carrara996, acknowledged a mileage discrepancy in the CarFax and agreed to address the issue, expressing concern about how it might impact the sale.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a positive sentiment towards the vehicle, particularly from @Archer84 who appreciates the improvement of cloth seats over the previous leather ones, stating they are much more comfortable. The seller, @idoxlr82, is commended for making this upgrade and is encouraged by @Archer84's kind words about their efforts. Additionally, @idoxlr82 has been responsive to requests for video content, suggesting that they've taken an active role in promoting the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @PAGSDIII701, show interest in additional content related to the vehicle, specifically requesting city and highway driving videos. @idoxlr82, the seller, has acknowledged this request and promised to provide the videos shortly, indicating a level of engagement with potential buyers. This response shows readiness on the seller's part to enhance the buyer's experience and increase transparency.
Negative: There are hints of concern regarding the delivery logistics, as noted by @PAGSDIII701 mentioning potential delays at a specific location in Coon Rapids. However, this point does not seem to directly impact the vehicle's quality but raises questions about the delivery process. No drastically negative opinions were expressed about the vehicle itself; the feedback focused mostly on appreciation and requests for further information.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Carbine123 noted the beauty of the white example, while @Esprit4Me appreciated the clean condition of the 968, highlighting how well it has been cared for. @GDogg and @SuperKram echoed similar sentiments about the car's attractive appearance, indicating it is a great looking Grand Prix White 968 Coupe. @cslater8, who has personal experience with the vehicle, confirmed its fun driving experience and reliability during their time together in the Texas hill country, and emphasized the uniqueness of the car. @Kricci praised the vehicle for being a well cared for beauty, reassuring potential buyers that they wouldn't be disappointed.
Neutral: @chrispychickens (The Seller) shared his positive experiences over 18 months of ownership, detailing a successful 700-mile trip and extensive maintenance to ensure the vehicle's reliability. He is open to questions and offers potential buyers opportunities for inspections and interactions. Several commenters, including @bxfe and @Lions_share77, engaged in discussions regarding specific technical aspects of the vehicle, such as the fuel tank repairs and the type of limited-slip differential installed after the fact, showing an interest in the mechanical details of the car.
Negative: @Spectre996 raised a concern about the potential for pinion bearing noise, reflecting a key issue for prospective buyers. @bxfe asked for specifics on the fuel tank repair and questioned the type of limited-slip differential, showing that there may be noticeable concerns regarding the car's maintenance history. Additionally, this vehicle's previous lesser usage by the last owner could raise eyebrows among buyers regarding its reliability over time, despite its current solid condition as stated by the seller.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the bike, highlighting its unique Italian design and craftsmanship. @rofandofy calls it a rare opportunity to buy a cool classic, while @professorgearhead praises the seller as trustworthy, emphasizing his engineering background and longtime friendship. Commenters like @motolargo fondly recall their own experiences with similar bikes, noting their excellent handling and distinctive sound, which adds to the bike's appeal. @toomany also appreciates the bike's aesthetics, acknowledging it as a beautiful and unmolested example of classic Italian engineering.
Neutral: Several individuals commented on specific features and details about the bike, seeking clarity on things like the electric start assembly and the presence of a side stand. @pacificcoastshaker, the seller, responded directly to multiple inquiries, confirming the electric starter is included and discussing its mixed reviews, as well as addressing prospective buyers' concerns regarding tariffs. Comments such as those from @Multistrada1 and @Carmen214 reflect curiosity about import tariffs, showcasing the practical side of the buying process and the seller's willingness to assist potential buyers with information.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the bike's condition, especially regarding potential paint overspray and oil leaks after long-term storage. @toomany specifically questioned the repainted areas and any possible signs of oil leaks, while @cyclemikey suggested the observed paint issue might just be a reflection. Additionally, the bike's lack of a side stand was noted, with some commenters, including @RedJetta, offering tips on how to start bikes with left-side kick starters. These comments indicate an underlying caution among buyers regarding the bike's maintenance and usability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Slenhoff (The Seller) has presented the 1964 Triumph TR4 enthusiastically, offering a welcoming introduction and encouraging potential buyers to ask questions. Commenters like @67tr4a have shown support by suggesting the combination of a Triumph engine with a 5-speed gearbox would enhance performance, while @trracer complimented both the aesthetics of the car and the quality of the driving video, appreciating the car's appearance and functionality. @maw06 echoed this sentiment, highlighting the classy gray leather interior as an example of "understated elegance," which adds to the car's appeal.
Neutral: Several comments indicate curiosity about the vehicle's condition and features, particularly related to the speedometer calibration and electrical system. @KirkVandezande expressed a concern about the ammeter's behavior in cold-start scenarios and suggested potential fixes, while @trracer inquired whether the speedometer was accurate after gearbox modifications, further discussing common issues with retrofitting. @Slenhoff responded to these inquiries with detailed clarifications, assuring potential buyers of the vehicle's maintenance history and addressing concerns about the speedometer with metrics from a smartphone app.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's electrical system, specifically the voltage regulator's condition, as @KirkVandezande noted erratic ammeter behavior. Additionally, @BTinPS questioned the presence of any leaks, to which @Slenhoff confirmed the car is generally dry but noted an occasional small oil spot. @criley remarked on the unorthodox choice of a white dashboard, implying it might not be to everyone's taste, but the overall commentary seems to lean more towards curiosity than outright disapproval.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg commented that it’s a good looking 110 and wished the seller best wishes. @GBRBiLL praised the vehicle for its nice vibe, claiming it is purposeful looking and embodies what a Defender should be. @rzilla2112 called the truck beautiful, which indicates that there is an appreciation for its aesthetic among some commentators. The seller, @peacemakerind, emphasized that the truck is perfect for Montana with a strong motor and turbo, smooth transmission, and tight suspension. The vehicle is described as a well-appointed Land Rover that rides straight and excels in climbing through mountainous terrain.
Neutral: @WAGONBOYTD questioned the seller about why they are selling the vehicle so quickly and remarked on the vehicle's capability in mountainous conditions. @knmase inquired about photos prior to the repainting of the vehicle. The seller provided information about the truck’s background, mentioning it was originally a military vehicle, which adds to its intrigue. Several comments also address the vehicle's modifications and performance, with @2hecknback stating that the quality of refurbishing is more significant than original specifications.
Negative: @WAGONBOYTD and @milya raised concerns about the bounce of the speedometer and questioned the vehicle’s performance going uphill — suggesting dissatisfaction with some of the vehicle's capabilities and perhaps some inconsistencies in the seller's descriptions. Despite the improvements the seller claims the vehicle has undergone, concerns about its reliability and overall condition linger in the discussions, with an emphasis on the need for the truck to perform reliably in real-world scenarios rather than just in visual tests.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bry_Bry praises the vehicle as awesome, expressing confusion over why it hasn't sold. @dhdsales (The Seller) provides detailed answers about the vehicle's features, such as the queen-size bed and the use of foam insulation, which impresses users. Several commenters, including @KJSpaugh and @LUCKYLUCK, appreciate the aesthetic and functionality of the vehicle, noting its suitability for various purposes and its well-maintained condition.
Neutral: Commenters like @Lrflores74 ask practical questions about the vehicle's dimensions and capacity, which @dhdsales (The Seller) answers, clarifying the internal heights and external dimensions. There is curiosity about the vehicle's previous use with @HotVette inquiring about its history as a beach ambulance and @roadtrip2u asking about plumbing and storage. The mixed bids and comments regarding the auction prices from @MisterFredUS and @barchettamax add an interesting dynamic that showcases the bidding environment.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism about the vehicle's reliability, particularly regarding the condition of the glow plugs, as noted by @LUCKYLUCK, raising concerns about potential costs for repairs. @acemobilesrq makes a light-hearted comment about its past, which might imply doubts about its suitability for serious use, while commenters like @GTstyle and @MisterFredUS highlight confusion and amusement over the bidding process, questioning the validity of bids provided.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @NJDriver (The Seller) describes the 2008 Aston Martin Vantage Roadster as a stunning vehicle in immaculate condition with a very low mileage of 7600 miles. The car has been well taken care of, stored in a temperature-controlled garage, and has no accidents or major repairs. Many bidders seem impressed with the car's condition, with comments such as it being a 'total gem' and 'beautiful,' indicating high interest and admiration from potential buyers. @kubes40 notes that finding a car in such condition is rare, suggesting it should fetch a good price.
Neutral: The comments reflect a mix of inquiries and supportive remarks, with several bidders asking about the car's tires and general condition. @BTrain questions the age and tread of the tires, while @Ajamjar suggests posting more interior photos to maximize its appeal. @Craft also expresses nostalgia about having owned a similar car, highlighting how common it is to see low mileage Vantages and mentioning that newer tires can improve the driving experience. @NJDriver (The Seller) is responsive, providing updates and answers to technical queries as they arise in the auction.
Negative: Some comments express concern about the age of the tires, with @David993S asking if it's advisable to drive with 18-year-old tires, and @tkehoe pointing out a perceived scratch on the car, prompting clarification from @NJDriver (The Seller). Potential buyers show concern for the condition and upkeep of the vehicle, needing reassurance about the car's overall health and maintenance. Additionally, @Scliffe advises @NJDriver (The Seller) to answer every query to enhance trust and potentially increase the auction's final price, indicating that transparency is critical in this sale.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @sbmaine (The Seller) has highlighted the impressive history and performance of the car, boasting of its victory in the 2024 GT3 TT Championship while outpacing more expensive competitors. He emphasized the vehicle's race-ready capabilities, indicating that it has been professionally managed and developed for optimal performance over the last two seasons. Commenters like @boaboyoz have echoed these praises, noting the car's aesthetic appeal and speed, for instance, remarking on its wicked cool appearance and how smooth its performance is during races.
Neutral: Throughout the comments, potential buyers expressed curiosity about specifications and features, with inquiries about horsepower, weight, and included spares. @juice301 asked about the car's power, and @sweetness12 expressed interest in the vehicle's dry weight. @notanothermiata sought clarification on the car's title status, while @gs4106 was interested in the spare parts that would come with the purchase, engaging in a dialogue about the components and condition of the car.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, there were concerns regarding the car's title status. @notanothermiata pointed out that the car was registered as a street vehicle for part of its life, seeking further clarification from @sbmaine regarding its current title situation. @sbmaine clarified that the car is sold as a bill-of-sale racecar, stripped of street equipment, and emphasized that he had no desire for a title, stating it would be unnecessary for a racecar. This concern about documentation might deter some potential buyers who favor clear title histories.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @rogerdalal expressed enthusiasm, noting that the bike is absolutely fantastic and wishes the best for the auction winner, indicating they'll be extremely happy with it. @rickaz, despite a personal bias against the 'murdered' look, found this motorcycle to be exceptional artwork. Additionally, @D90LE_001of300 shared excitement over the bike's bobbed look and acknowledged upgrades made by its seller, reflecting a deep appreciation for the bike’s aesthetics and craftsmanship.
Neutral: @jkoenig961 (The Seller) highlighted the passion behind the bike's construction and its ability to stand out at bike nights, inviting questions from potential buyers. The seller confirmed the bike has heated grips that work but noted that the reverse recall campaign was not completed, stating it was unnecessary in their ownership. They also clarified that original parts are not included in the sale but hinted they have spare OEM parts that could be discussed with the winning bidder.
Negative: @berfinroy raised concerns about the market direction for motorcycle brands like BMW, suggesting they may be struggling to appeal to younger riders amid changes in motorcycling culture. @D90LE_001of300 and @H2garage inquired about potential errors related to modifications and requested clarity on what parts are included in the sale, indicating a need for more information about the bike's condition. Overall, there are questions about the originality and completeness of the motorcycle in the auction.
![]() |
17×8″ and 17×9″ Forged BBS RG-II Wheels for 5×114.3 Applications
Set of Four 17" BBS RG-II Wheels
Lot 209958
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @Craig_GA complimented the rims, describing them as nice-looking, while @MechGee shared a positive personal experience, stating that he has a set on his FC RX-7 and they fit perfectly. Furthermore, @frenchfelgen mentioned that these New Old Stock rims would look amazing on a Toyota A70 Supra, highlighting their versatility and fit for Mazda Rx7 FC cars as well.
Neutral: @Cmdr430 inquired about the hub bore, to which @frenchfelgen responded with the detailed center bore measurement of 60mm. @JimK asked for the offset of the 8" rims, and @GTVCAYMANDINOLUSSO provided the information, confirming that the front wheels have an offset of ET45 and the rear pair are ET40. Discussions also pointed out the discrepancies in the description concerning the rim sizes, with @MrConflicted noting the differences between the advertised and listed sizes in the "BaT Essentials" box.
Negative: There was some confusion regarding the rim sizes, as noted by @MrConflicted, who pointed out a mismatch between the description and the essentials box. Additionally, @SkipShot raised concerns about shipping, asking what the costs would be to the U.S., to which @frenchfelgen addressed the oversight by stating the shipping cost is 890 USD with UPS expedited shipping. Overall, while the comments were largely positive, the inconsistencies and shipping costs created some apprehension among potential buyers.
![]() |
2.2L-Powered 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X GSR 5-Speed
JA3AW86V18U607015
Lot 209959
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed a strong interest in the vehicle, noting its low mileage as a remarkable feature, with @DoggerDave even contemplating purchasing it and restoring it to stock form. The owner, @PANAMERA63S, provided clear and helpful guidance for potential buyers on the import process to the US, demonstrating transparency and willingness to assist. Additionally, @PANAMERA63S reassured potential buyers about the authenticity of the vehicle's mileage, indicating a commitment to honesty in the selling process.
Neutral: There were inquiries from various users seeking clarification on certain aspects of the vehicle and the import process. @MS23 asked about tax and tariffs for importing the vehicle into the US, while @Vince1518 requested dyno sheets and maintenance receipts to understand the vehicle's performance and history better. @Toyoda brought up concerns regarding the accuracy of the vehicle's mileage as reported by Carfax, prompting further clarification from the seller.
Negative: Some comments pointed out concerns regarding the vehicle's modifications and the potential complexities involved in the importing process. @SlowNRusty made a light-hearted comment on the owner's modifications, indicating a bit of skepticism about the vehicle's modifications. Additionally, @Toyoda was concerned about the discrepancy in the vehicle's mileage, which raised questions about its maintenance and history. While the seller provided explanations, these concerns left some uncertainty among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered significant praise from various commentors. @mtx392 highlighted the interesting rear spoiler, nicknamed the Aerokit Cup, calling it 'very cool.' @lmanier noted the car's excellent condition and rarity as the last year of the non-turbo 911. @Nashvegas echoed this, calling the Aerokit Cup the coolest option available on the 991.1 model. The seller, @jlandry13, emphasized how well the car has been cared for, noting it has spent most of its life in an air-conditioned garage and looks and smells new. Others like @GDogg and @sixt7L36 provided encouraging remarks, labeling the GTS as excellent and enjoyable to drive, further contributing to the vehicle's positive reputation.
Neutral: Several comments also provided factual clarifications and inquiries about the vehicle's specifications. @jakero asked if it included a backup camera and why the front spoiler was replaced, to which @jlandry13 confirmed it only has parking sensors and explained the repair. Questions regarding the availability of Apple CarPlay brought responses that indicated it was not a factory option on this model, with suggestions of aftermarket solutions provided by @cryptical1200 and @BeeManGT3. @Smoke001 inquired about the possibility of a build sheet and window sticker, showing an interest in the vehicle's features and history without expressing a clear opinion on the car's value or appeal.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, some comments reflected concerns or requests for more information. @joeytogo asked about the smoking package and whether the seller was a smoker, implying concern over the vehicle's interior condition. @jakero's inquiry about the backup camera pointed out a potential limitation in the vehicle's technology, and @Switchback sought clarification about shipping logistics, which may indicate a lack of assurance regarding the transaction process. However, these negative impressions were minor in comparison to the overwhelmingly positive feedback about the vehicle's condition and performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @jturner described the vehicle as magnificent, asserting it to be the best of the best and the best of the rest. @steve0415 expressed excitement about the Corvette featuring correct Signet Red paint and matching interior colors, marking it as an iconic example and commending it as a great Corvette. @Barryward declared the 1958 model to be exceptional, while @Bordeaux praised it as one of the best automatic Corvettes in recent memory, noting its correct features and emphasizing the leisurely driving experience it offers, which contrasts with sportier cars.
Neutral: @wslehman inquired about the vehicle's functionality, seeking assurance on any operational issues and requesting a driving video. @Miatadon, despite not being a Corvette owner, acknowledged the car’s gorgeous appearance while pointing out a detail about the tires being from a later model year. @LarryMauldin (The Seller) addressed concerns about the vehicle's functionality, stating that all lights, wipers, and windows work as intended and confirming that the car has never been in a collision. @Bordeaux mentioned an observation regarding the hood not closing properly, which was clarified by the seller as being due to a photographer's error rather than any actual issue with the vehicle.
Negative: @Bordeaux raised a concern regarding the appearance of the body, with potential bidders expressing doubt about its straightness and arguing that the measurements appeared incorrect. @thermalman questioned whether the car had ever been in an accident, showcasing hesitation among potential buyers. @Bordeaux further suggested that the photographer might have been at fault for misleading representations that could have turned bidders away, indicating issues with the car's perceived condition. Additionally, concerns about minor judging issues and the presence of aftermarket parts were mentioned by @Mfus, who stressed that proper attention would be needed for potential NCRS re-evaluation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiastic admiration for the vehicle's modifications and overall aesthetics. @Uglide1996 highlighted the confidence-inspiring front disc brakes while @440belvedere echoed excitement with the quote, "Cool car + 4-sp = WINNING!!!" @Valiantjim noted the impressive updates that respect the original specifications, mentioning the car's striking high-impact lime green color, stroker crank kit, and retention of factory features. Several commenters, including @Djordan442 and @SerottaD, mentioned the fun and nostalgic driving experience this car promises, appreciating how it retains a factory look while being modernized in good taste.
Neutral: Commenters acknowledged aspects of the car with mixed evaluations. @xkguy (The Seller) indicated the car is fast but mentioned the absence of dyno numbers and specifics like compression and cam details, which left some questions unanswered regarding performance metrics. @Tony63Bee requested information on dyno numbers while @WIZZZZ inquired about the engine specifications and potential rust issues. @markccmw raised a concern about visible rust bubbles, which others seemed to overlook in favor of the car's overall condition.
Negative: Criticism surfaced regarding certain aspects and a few unanswered questions about the vehicle's condition. @Billythekiddo posed a skeptical query about its long-term durability compared to other engines, suggesting that the vehicle might be more radical than reliable. Commenters like @MikeDTaz pointed out that while the car is a great find, it has minor issues that might require attention. Furthermore, concerns were raised about specific mechanical details and the general condition of certain components, such as the clutch, leading to a sense of caution among some prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's design and craftsmanship, with @40fordlover calling it a "Mean machine!!" and @Rowdyroyce praising it as a "very well presented offering". @Speedster47 hails it as "one of the best Model A coupes ever done," applauding the effort put into the build. Commenters like @hotrodkid79 and @Cryobrad54 extol the blonde interior and engine power, noting that it is built to represent the style of traditional hot rods, while @FAO appreciates the unique features like the dimpled valve covers and adjustable rockers, emphasizing it as a fine machine.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the car's unique characteristics and presentation without extreme enthusiasm or criticism. @Oakhurst notes the slanted windshield's resemblance to a 1932 model, while @silver63 mentions the name dropping in the description but still appreciates the build quality. @HRWCosta, the seller, provides clarity about the vehicle's features and modifications. Other commenters like @ADbuch and @MGB6 question specific design choices, such as the name of the coupe, the effectiveness of drum brakes, and the absence of certain gauges, indicating thoughtful consideration of the vehicle's practicality.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, some comments raise concerns. @revron questions the legality and safety of the red headlights, while @5632 critiques the lack of flush doors and suggests that they should have been better integrated into the body. @MGB6 calls for a disc brake conversion due to the vehicle's high horsepower and light weight. The critiques generally revolve around safety and functionality issues rather than overall aesthetic appeal, implying that while the car is impressive, there are elements that could be improved.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Jake_Angel praised the vehicle's beauty, while @stugottz celebrated the customization of mid-year coupes, declaring them awesome despite the traditional views of Corvette purists. @Chefgordiemac referred to the C2 as beautiful and appreciated the perfectly designed flares which complement the car, agreeing that since it's not equipped with the original drivetrain, customization is acceptable. @Dgehrin (The Seller) noted positive feedback on the custom offset and dish Boyd Coddington Wheels, which match well with the fenders and are a product of meticulous measuring and fitting. Other commentors like @19seventy3vette reminisced about the car's appearance as quintessentially 1970s, reinforcing a nostalgic vibe for the listing.
Neutral: @Dgehrin (The Seller) provided a comprehensive history of the car, detailing previous ownership and the extensive refurbishment work undertaken including a complete brake system overhaul and fuel system upgrades. He also outlined the improvements made to the drivetrain and ensured the car's reliability for various events like Corvette cruises and shows. Commentors like @Astonjag and @Dgehrin reaffirmed the importance of clear operation demonstrations in driving videos. The consensus indicates that the vehicle is well-suited for driving, with no transmission or clutch issues noted during test drives, and others echoed interest in additional electronic operation videos.
Negative: However, not all comments were purely positive. @bertrand pointed out that the volt meter and clock are inoperative, questioning the status of the radio and power windows, as well as noting that the differential is from a small block car. Another commentor, @Lurvey, inquired about the block number and any evidence of past accidents, indicating a need for more transparency about the vehicle's modifications and history. There were also mentions by users about ensuring the integrity of the build tags and electrical systems, highlighting that potential buyers seek reassurance regarding their investment.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dadsracer (The Seller) emphasizes that this vehicle is a good work truck, highlighting its reliability while providing reassurance about the condition of essential components. He mentions the clean title status and confirms that both airbags and the left seat belt were replaced after an accident. Despite its age, he insists the truck is functional and suitable for anyone capable of driving a manual transmission, making it a practical choice for work-related tasks.
Neutral: Several commenters pose questions regarding the vehicle's mechanical aspects and history. @Mapguy inquires about the type of transmission, while @SFO asks if the coolant hoses and belts are original or have been replaced. @Vintage-mech points out that multiple fuel system components were replaced after a lengthy period of inactivity, questioning whether the fuel tank was also addressed. These inquiries reflect a shared interest in understanding the vehicle's condition and maintenance history without any strong overt judgement.
Negative: There are concerns about the exterior condition of the truck. @ieharris questions the quality of the paint, suggesting that it may have been poorly buffed, leading to an unappealing finish. Additionally, @RBBarkley raises points about potential salvage titles, airbag deployment, and physical damage, asking for photographic evidence of the fender core support replacement and mentioning alignment issues that could arise from past damage. These negative perceptions cast doubt on the truck's visual appeal and overall integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as a "groovy gray GMC Sierra," highlighting its impressive size and cool build with enthusiasm. @marshallom appreciates the custom design, noting the truck is very well put together, and expresses interest in bidding if possible. The combination of the carbureted 350 engine and 700R4 transmission is praised for creating a strong, reliable drivetrain without the complexity of modern electronics.
Neutral: @JHernandez inquires about the installation details of the BluePrint Engine and 700R transmission, seeking clarification about the documentation for the work done. In response, @JonathanRoss (The Seller) explains that the installations were completed in January 2024 and confirms that he possesses receipts and photos related to the work performed, adding more context to the vehicle's history.
Negative:
![]() |
Countach-Style, Supercharged 3.8L-Powered 1986 Pontiac Fiero
1G2PE37R5GP275343
Lot 209882
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @Rojer007 (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm for the bidding process and offers to answer questions regarding the vehicle. Several commenters, such as @robbiefarmer, appreciate the affordability of the vehicle, highlighting it as an "affordable 'Lamborghini'" and a potential head-turner at shows as mentioned by @Rojer007. @LamboLover77 praises the craftsmanship, suggesting that, if one were not knowledgeable, they would mistake it for a real Countach. Moreover, @bodhi1601, with previous experience of owning a Countach, claims the proportions of this vehicle are accurate and suggests potential improvements that would enhance its appearance.
Neutral: Feedback from various commenters reveals a mix of opinions and requests for more information about the vehicle's performance and specifications. @Sully52 brings an open-minded perspective, emphasizing personal preference in car styles. Commenters like @Fhawk and @Craven highlight technical concerns regarding the transmission setup. Other contributors, including @Skegeevette and @chrisb53, seek clarification regarding physical aspects, such as potential wheel clearance issues and the visible supercharger. @Rojer007 responds to queries, indicating a willingness to provide additional documentation and videos to showcase the car's condition and operation.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism and critiques of the vehicle's design and functionality. @Midengineracer and @hansbleisch voice concerns about the car's transmission and dimensions, with @hansbleisch specifically pointing to the rear wheel well clearance. @joeveto delivers a cheeky remark comparing the vehicle unfavorably to a "prosthetic schlong," while @LMGun derogatorily refers to it as a "cute wannabe." Overall, the feedback reflects a mixture of admiration for the car's intent but also calls for improvements and clarifications regarding its build quality and historical information.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and driving experience. @jhaddad0 mentioned a desire to bring it back to Newark, while @roadsterswap fondly recalled memories tied to a similar Alfa model. @porkpiehat praised the 'driver quality restomod' and expressed excitement about its unique color. @Havatoy emphasized the fun of driving the car, noting it draws crowds and wins awards at shows. @Ezmoni (The Seller), reflecting on the driving experience, described it as 'thrilling,' and he conveyed satisfaction with the car's comfort and driving capabilities.
Neutral: Several comments reflect curiosity and seek further information about the car's original parts and modifications. @ColumbiaMotorAlley inquired about the availability of original seats and bumpers, while @BrakeHard5634 asked about the purpose of a plexiglass wind deflector. @DrT requested undercarriage photos and questioned about driver comfort for taller individuals. @YankeeTR5 shared a personal account regarding size comfort in similar models, reinforcing the vehicle's reasonable interior space. The discussion around modifications versus originality emerged, with @Mark1mgb noting the potential collector aspect alongside the vehicle's modified attributes.
Negative: Criticism of the vehicle mainly focused on the modifications, with @Ratedarrgh expressing discontent with the changes made compared to the original design. @rmessner lamented the removal of body spears, believing they added to the vehicle's design, while @belgianvt questioned the absence of original bumpers. @Lionel pointed out potential issues regarding tariffs on modifications that could deter international buyers. Overall, some commenters seemed concerned that the modifications could impact the car's value and desirability in a collector's market.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the bike for its low mileage and overall reliability. @Jonesy66 described it as a 'sick bike' with 'lowwww miles', indicating enthusiasm for its condition. @Luky1 emphasized that with only 7k miles, the boxer engine isn't even broken in, suggesting confidence in the bike's durability. Additionally, @LtCabron noted the bike's excellent maintenance, indicating that it wouldn't require frequent repairs, and @Remster expressed that this 2006 model has great possibilities, further adding to the positive sentiment surrounding this vehicle.
Neutral: There were queries related to the bike's features, with @vedipus inquiring about the 'Enduro Gearbox' and @Raylc asking about the seat height, indicating an interest in customization for a better riding experience. @JMcCorkle (The Seller) provided information about the bike's first gear engagement and confirmed the tires are tubeless, showcasing engagement from the seller. Some users like @hammersmith and @Bartleby8 raised important questions about tire condition and potential mechanical issues, demonstrating a balanced discussion about the bike's status without clear negativity.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the vehicle's reliability, notably around potential mechanical issues. @Bartleby8 highlighted known problems like ABS pump failure and rear main seal concerns, while @Sixxgun pointed out historical issues with the model's ABS systems. Additionally, commenters expressed caution regarding the impacts of low mileage on the bike's functionality, indicating that while the bike is well-maintained, there are lingering worries about its long-term reliability and maintenance needs. @Luky1's discussion about the frequent adjustments for valve maintenance underscores some underlying issues that may come with the model as well.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz highlights the stunning aesthetic of the vehicle, calling it a "very handsome Hugger Orange Camaro" and praises its tremendous build, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @NCRSmaniac agrees on the beauty of the car, emphasizing the appeal of a '69 Camaro convertible in Hugger Orange, declaring it to be a killer car. @popsiepoo expresses admiration, describing it as a "bitchin Camaro" and congratulating the future owner.
Neutral: @Dbflett shares his search for the perfect '69 Camaro, indicating that this vehicle might be the one for him. @BSer points out a color discrepancy, noting that the car appears more red than orange in the photos, prompting curiosity about its true hue. @Jimmy55 requests more detailed images, specifically addressing concerns about rust in the frame and undercarriage, as well as a couple of photos that clarify the hood alignment.
Negative: @BIGBLOCKJAMO criticizes the presence of Z-28 stripes on this Super Sport model, expressing frustration that detracts from the car's value and emphasizing that it deserves better. @RMQ333 echoes this sentiment, wishing the car still had an X22 black back panel, indicating dissatisfaction with the current cosmetic choices. Overall, these remarks highlight a divide in opinions regarding the vehicle's design elements.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GSN mentioned that the vehicle is in nice condition, particularly appreciating the suspension photos. @Atef96960 (The Seller) confirmed that a temporary tag will be provided and stated that credit cards are accepted as payment, with an explanation of the associated fees. Overall, the promptness in addressing inquiries about payment and vehicle documentation, such as providing additional photos, is commendable.
Neutral: Discussions regarding the cosmetic condition of the vehicle have been ongoing, with @CC3698 and @Bigcreek inquiring about specific issues like the passenger door handle paint and the presence of dents or scratches. @Atef96960 (The Seller) has responded by providing updates and uploading photos to clarify these concerns. The topic of tire DOT dates has also been raised, indicating a need for detailed information about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Several comments reflect concerns about the vehicle's appearance, particularly with questions from @CC3698 about the paint beneath the door handles and @kwilson interrogating the existence of a dent in the tailgate. @Bigcreek's queries about black marks in photos further underscore scrutiny about the vehicle's condition. Despite @Atef96960 (The Seller) attempting to reassure potential buyers by stating that marks are no longer present and that original stickers are the source of some concerns, there remains skepticism about the vehicle's overall cosmetic integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @zdoctor expressed excitement about the vehicle's unique sunset orange color, noting that it has grown on him more over time. He appreciates the overall specification and mentioned that he was happy with his own choice of color. @Dave.quattro praised the restoration of the vehicle, calling it a fine piece of engineering and a potential track weapon if priced well. @belikd (The Seller) highlighted the car's excellent overall condition, emphasizing its clean interior and minimal signs of use, which give it a new car feel. He also addressed concerns about airbags, stating that they did not deploy during the incident.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions about the vehicle's history and condition, including @phinsn98's inquiries about the rebuilt title and the accident's details. @DrBob42 asked for photographs of the car prior to refurbishment to better understand the damage and repairs. @sackboy, @E36E46M3, and @Vanace all mentioned the need for a driving video to demonstrate the vehicle's performance, while @RCO_021 requested undercarriage photos as well. @belikd (The Seller) responded to these queries, promising a driving video and clarifying issues concerning the fit of parts and the condition of the tires.
Negative: Some commenters expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle's salvaged status. @An_architect, who owns a body shop, warned about the implications of the car being salvaged and called into question the statements of minimal damage made by the seller. @BimmerVette pointed out visible gaps and potential past damage based on salvage yard photos, questioning the overall care given to the car by its previous owner. @maw06 noted that the vehicle was wearing nine-year-old tires, which raised concerns about the need for immediate replacement. There were also comments like those of @E36E46M3, who questioned the decision to not provide a driving video despite the high bids for a salvaged car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Jack-Porsche expresses appreciation for the car, calling it an "Absolute classic!" and @Ptama comments that it's nice to see a car in white, indicating a positive sentiment towards its color. @ProvaMo notes the originality of the car's door lower seals, which is a positive sign, and they appreciate the correctness in orientation of the passenger side seat, reinforcing the vehicle's overall integrity.
Neutral: Comments from @WCDM (The Seller) address inquiries with professionalism, offering to provide more details regarding maintenance and services performed on the vehicle. They reassure @90sundevil and @mike_747 by promising to update with recent service records while discussing specifics of shipping and importation processes. The seller also mentions the work done on the car and offers to answer any further questions, displaying a willingness to communicate.
Negative: On the downside, @90sundevil raises concerns about the timing belt service, noting it hasn’t been changed in 12 years, which prompts @mike_747 to speculate on potentially deferred maintenance issues. Furthermore, @ProvaMo critiques the passenger seat leather, suggesting it should have been restored alongside the driver’s seat to maintain consistent quality. @mike_747 further questions the high cost of the new tires, indicating a possible lack of transparency in pricing, which adds to an overall feeling of skepticism regarding the maintenance and service history.
![]() |
2014 Porsche Cayman PCA/MMC 3.4L Race Car by DeMan Motorsports
WP0AA2A82EK173354
Lot 209892
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: The 981 Cayman built by DeMan Motorsport is praised for its reliability, performance, and thoughtful construction. @colligo, the seller, emphasizes that the car is race-ready, quick, and professional maintained, which has led to consistently impressive track performance. Commentors such as @Bullish and @GW.Huffalo appreciate the quality of the build and express excitement over its appearance and potential for enjoyment by the next owner. The car has received significant upgrades for cooling and thermal management, showcasing a focus on durability and track readiness.
Neutral: Several users have asked for specific details regarding the car's modifications and compliance. @juice301 inquires about horsepower, which @colligo confirms at 325 WHP with 283 ft-lbs torque, while other questions pertain to air conditioning, potential PCA compliance, and the specifications of the roll cage. @GT3Driver116 and others discuss the implications of the car's build on its racing eligibility, indicating general enthusiasm while also seeking clarification on technical aspects.
Negative: There are some concerns noted by commenters regarding the listing's accuracy, like @ILikePi pointing out that the leakdown numbers are actually compression test results. Moreover, inquiries raised by @jcp911s and @dkoranyi1980 highlight a lack of documentation such as a logbook for PCA racing, and specifics about the roll cage are requested, hinting at potential buyers' hesitance regarding the car's readiness for sanctioned events. @juice301 also questions the necessity of a rebuild after extensive use, indicating concerns about the vehicle's long-term reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Nickv09 expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's two-tone color scheme, stating it looks great. This indicates a positive visual appeal of the vehicle. The compliments suggest that the aesthetic design features are well-received by viewers.
Neutral: @Edward26 inquired about the specific lift height installed on the vehicle, suggesting curiosity about the modifications and specifications. @Hvacman asked for a closeup of the glove box SPID sticker, which indicates an interest in the detailed features of the truck and its options. @Assam noted the multiple options mentioned in the SPID, suggesting that the truck has a variety of custom features, highlighting the unique aspects of the vehicle without explicit praise or criticism.
Negative: However, @Tony1002000 (The Seller) clarified that he did not install the lift, as it was already present when purchased, which may suggest that some buyers could be concerned about the quality or history of the modifications made to the vehicle. There are implications that the 'custom' nature might lead to skepticism regarding the vehicle's originality or integrity, even if it has desirable features.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @AZkid shared that they were not originally a Ferrari enthusiast but after acquiring a similar car, they became a fan, emphasizing the superb driving experience and the absence of the typical Ferrari stigma. @Shawh echoed this sentiment, expressing admiration for the car and wishing the consigner well. @alfriedesq appreciated the beauty of the machine and welcomed the new owner, while @Mygeser mentioned their positive ownership experience with a similar model, describing it as reliable and exhilarating to drive. Overall, many commenters seem to agree on the uniqueness and appeal of the Ferrari 355, indicating a strong sense of community around these vehicles.
Neutral: Commenters provided a mixture of inquiries and observations about the car's condition. @borneo noted that while the car appears well-maintained, concerns regarding the headers and a potential leak down test were raised. @CaptJohn330 emphasized the importance of additional documentation, such as paint meter readings and engine performance data, while @Djyas (The Seller) responded to requests for videos and service records. @Djyas also highlighted the intention to address inquiries and provide information that could assist potential buyers, ensuring transparency in the sale process.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, some comments exhibited caution. @borneo questioned the car's history and potential issues related to low mileage and replaced headers. @CaptJohn330 insisted that without proper documentation, buyers face risks, implying that the car could have hidden faults. Similarly, @Mygeser acknowledged the balance of risk with ownership of a 30-year-old vehicle, hinting at potential unexpected repairs. The need for comprehensive checks and assurances was a recurring theme among the more critical comments, suggesting that potential buyers should approach with due diligence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @gman21 praised the Ford 8N for its terrific appearance and asked about its horsepower, showing genuine interest in the model. @gs1M, the seller, provided valuable information regarding the horsepower ratings from the Nebraska test, enhancing confidence in the tractor's performance. @Ranchero65 positively noted the importance of the over-riding coupler (ORC) on the PTO, indicating it was a great feature for safety and functionality, highlighting the seller's understanding of the tractor's specifications.
Neutral: @gs1M explained that he is not biased towards a specific brand and enjoys all types of tractors, including the Ford 8N he is currently selling. He also mentioned other brands he has worked on, presenting himself as an enthusiast knowledgeable about various tractor models. @JDub68 inquired about the Ford based on a previous auction listing, showing an active interest in the auction history without any negative connotation.
Negative: There were no outright negative comments in the discussion. However, @Ranchero65 did advise caution regarding the exposed PTO shaft on the tractor with the ORC, implying it is a safety concern that potential buyers should be aware of. The seller acknowledged questions about the tractor's location but did not clarify any challenges or issues with the Ford 8N itself.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Stropp described the vehicle as a Frankentruck and super cool, highlighting its unique appeal. @Beans_Bacon commented on the vehicle's beauty, expressing excitement and suggesting a burnout video, while wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @boaboyoz echoed positive sentiments by describing the truck as "green and white dynamite" and praising the awesome build, wishing the seller luck on the transaction.
Neutral: @Brite99 (The Seller) engaged with commenters by providing additional information about the vehicle, including links to more videos and responding to inquiries about the tire age and types available. When asked about the engine, @Brite99 clarified that it is stock factory spec with past repairs noted, while also answering questions about the truck's height. @Kriswithakmtk inquired about the truck's height and was promptly given the measurement, which indicates open communication between the seller and potential buyers.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns regarding the condition of the vehicle, with @JustMe1 asking about the engine's history and whether it had been built or rebuilt, while @carsandpoodles questioned the age of the tires. @ErinEhrman noted a potential misprint in the listing about the engine type, indicating a lack of clarity that might deter some buyers. Additionally, @yankeeflyer and @got-rpm sought further details about the engine specification and power steering system, indicating that there might be uncertainties that need addressing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @OutbackOregon expresses enthusiasm for the wood bumpers and rubber floor mats, highlighting their suitability for rugged conditions. @Manywheels59 appreciates the works undertaken, sharing a personal anecdote about a similar modification. @Brooktrout99 refers to the vehicle as a great-looking 'Pig,' inquiring about the operational status of the rear window and tailgate, indicating a level of admiration for the vehicle's overall appearance. @OutbackOregon further praises the functionality of the rear window mechanism, noting its quick operation as impressive.
Neutral: @911pig, the seller, provides detailed responses to inquiries about the vehicle's features. They confirm that the wooden bumpers are pressure treated and assure that they are removable and show minimal aging. They also clarify that the tailgate and rear window are fully operational and share information about the engine and other modifications done by a reputable shop, emphasizing quality in the vehicle's upgrades. The seller also mentions various enhancements made for improved functionality, like custom-fit rubber floor mats and soundproofing.
Negative: @Lanigiro raises concerns about the vehicle's potential rust issues, asking for more information regarding any mitigation efforts prior to painting. They note bubbling observed in the rain gutters and fenders and suggest that any new owner would likely want insights into the condition beneath the paint. This comment indicates a level of skepticism towards the vehicle's overall condition despite acknowledging the attractive features and upgrades.
![]() |

































































































