Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed strong enthusiasm for the Porsche 910, highlighting its racing heritage and impressive provenance. @anlenke described the auction as "big day for fiberglass Porsches," while @caymanandwent praised the car's beauty and connection to famed driver Vic Elford. An appreciation for the car's unique features and historical significance was prevalent, with @LolaC4S mentioning the extensive documentation included in the listing, and @seesavage recalling personal encounters with the car at races, noting its stunning appearance and the character of its previous owner.
Neutral: Comments that fell into the neutral category often sought clarification or additional information about the vehicle. @GECONN asked for the horsepower rating, and @davidb72 questioned the mention of a right-hand drive cockpit, to which @roadscholars1 (The Seller) confirmed the car's left-hand drive configuration. @uscarrera inquired whether the car had participated in any Rennsport Reunions, while @ene00124 requested specifics about engine hours and spare parts, showing a keen interest in the car's technical details without expressing strong opinions.
Negative: The negative comments were minimal but included concerns over the accuracy and integrity of the car's history. @parisbab challenged the engine details and identified a discrepancy about the car's construction timeline, questioning its classification as a British Privateer. Additionally, there were mentions of skepticism regarding the documentation provided, as seen in @parisbab's request for a more thorough engine performance test rather than just compression numbers. These comments indicated some doubt among potential bidders about the car's true authenticity and condition.
 |
 |
Positive: The Porsche 904 has garnered widespread admiration among commenters, with many praising it as one of the most beautiful cars ever produced. Commenters like @SalterIV and @Paul_Allen emphatically express their views on its stunning design and historical significance, highlighting its influence on future models like the Cayman. Others share nostalgic anecdotes, with @LaneFM recounting exhilarating drives alongside notable drivers, and @sdanen4 declaring the 904 as a pure representation of Porsche's genius. This collective admiration underlines not only the vehicle's aesthetic appeal but also its storied legacy in automotive history.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions about the vehicle's functional aspects and historical context. @peanutbutterfordogs raises questions about its registration capability, while @Djb_rh clarifies the legality of the car as a street-facing model despite its racing heritage. There are technical inquiries regarding engine specifications and replica availability, showing a blend of curiosity and interest in the car's features and its current market status. Simultaneously, vehicle history and previous ownership are recounted, such as @Faux_Cam's mention of the last known replica production details.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming positivity, some comments express dissatisfaction with the promotional video accompanying the car listing. @JGrey and @VenaGT criticize the added music in the driving video, feeling it detracts from the pure sound of the engine, while @Dphotos and @jeffreytkchan emphasize the desire for a more authentic driving experience free from unnecessary effects. Additionally, @jigoe007 derisively refers to the car as an "expensive Volkswagen," showcasing a dissenting view amidst the general admiration.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle's stunning aesthetics and allure. @boaboyoz describes it as a "devilishly handsome Dino" and notes its beauty in black, while @Shawh and @Barryward express their excitement and admiration. Enthusiasts like @alfriedesq and @Longforlineup also appreciate its design, with the latter noting the appealing contours of the GT variant in black. @F40_Motorsports mentions their dedication to answering questions, reinforcing a positive engagement with potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commentators are curious about the vehicle's history and technical specifications. @JWatts asks about a lien on the title, while @Elmansc inquires about the Ferrari Certificate of Authenticity. Others, like @jsgb, highlight the issue of the car not being a matching-numbers vehicle and seek clarification about its engine replacement. Furthermore, @LapsPG and @Tx246 discuss ownership history and confirmation of the vehicle's auction status, providing useful context for potential buyers.
Negative: A few comments raise concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and authenticity. @HeavyTank77 quips that the car has had more pictures taken than miles driven in the past two decades, implying it may not have been well used. @whipcity76 mentions the car is "put together with parts from other cars," signaling potential issues for purists. Additionally, @Monzapolis critiques the toolkit as being a poor repop, suggesting that there are details that could detract from the vehicle's overall value.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its exceptional qualities and status as a dream car. @kenzied1565 described it as 'STUNNING in Silver!', while @Dollycat3 called it 'Absolutely superb 🥂'. Enthusiasts like @Jack-Porsche and @N277PD referred to it as a 'Dream Car', with the latter hoping to genuinely enjoy it rather than flipping it. @boaboyoz praised it as a 'gorgeous GT Silver Metallic Carrera GT' and noted it as a 'phenomenal specimen'. @salubrious_toys, a CGT owner, emphasized its unmatched sound and engagement, while @EuroWerkz1 called it an 'incredible car' that offers great relative value.
Neutral: Some comments focused on inquiries regarding the car's history and condition. @inbcapital asked about paint protection and service history, while @Pcargod inquired about any recalls. The seller, @roadscholars1, assured that there was no paintwork and provided information on the car's service history, which included a completed factory recall. @prestigegabe and @N277PD sought clarifications about potential misalignments in the car's body panels, suggesting genuine interest in the vehicle's condition rather than purely flattering comments. @C2Turbo complimented the meticulous attention shown by the team caring for the car.
Negative: On the flip side, a few commenters expressed skepticism concerning the vehicle's price and offered reflections on past acquisition opportunities. @Tblackj mentioned his regret over not purchasing one at a lower price years ago, while @Gus1996 humorously noted a lack of financial capability even for the car's accompanying luggage. @Meeyatch1 criticized those who complain about the driving experience, suggesting that they lack the proper respect or understanding of the car. Additionally, @Hehfilwnw humorously lamented his own financial choices, indicating a level of frustration regarding the unattainable aspects of owning such an iconic vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the 911 Speedster Heritage Design as divine, calling it a thoroughly splendid specimen. @812GTSJeff highlighted the uniqueness of the 2019 Speedster, emphasizing its superiority over the GT3 Touring and its comparative pricing as a bargain. @59turner expressed admiration for the alluring design, noting the captivating silver/tan and breathtaking red/tan color options. @gullwing71 remarked on the stunning appearance of the Speedster, suggesting the low mileage may be due to the previous owner's admiration for its looks. @remoorejr described the car as Porsche artwork at its finest, contemplating the emotional difficulty of selling it, while @Siowner appreciated the vehicle’s excellent condition and the powerful engine, predicting an increase in its value over time.
Neutral: @BlackSD provided detailed information about the vehicle, including modifications made for improved sound and performance, such as the installation of a Dundon Street Header Kit and a GT3 Muffler. Clarifications were provided about the ownership history, detailing that the car lived in multiple locations including CT and SC before moving to Idaho, and about the vehicle's maintenance service, wrapping up by assuring potential buyers of its untouched status regarding performance limits. @Pinkbunny and @dieselino57 discussed the potential implications of aftermarket modifications on selling price and the ease of reverting to stock, with Pinkbunny thanking the seller for thorough responses to inquiries about the exhaust and DME.
Negative: @Jdshap raised concerns about the aftermarket exhaust, questioning whether the exhaust system was not OEM as initially indicated. Additionally, @Jimbo912 inquired about the possible effects of the modifications on the vehicle's warranty, suggesting that potential buyers might be cautious of aftermarket changes. The seller, @BlackSD, acknowledged that the warranty was limited and likely wouldn’t be affected by exhaust modifications, but the nature of the vehicle’s original components and any potential depreciation remained a topic of scrutiny among commenters.
|
 |
Positive: @Mtairyauto describes the bike as the most fun one can have without clothes on, while @fbfitz46 calls it a beautiful bike that is tempting, especially for someone who owns Ducati's earlier models. @caffine praises the bike as an absolute masterpiece and appreciates the extensive collection of photos showcasing its beauty. @enthusiastic_enthusiast, the seller, assures potential buyers that the Ducati 996 SPS #1451 has always been preserved and that it includes a fresh set of belts and a new battery for the next owner, adding that the bike's original parts include the airbox and exhaust.
Neutral: @GV1390 requests for cold start videos and any receipts related to the bike, while also asking about the date codes on the tires. @tbs inquires if there are any keys available for the bike. @Sal996R shares that he learned the US SPS models were delivered with racing silencers and a different setup for the European market. Throughout the discussions, several users reference the bike’s exceptional originality and express curiosity about its history and modifications, thus engaging deeply with the details and specifications of the Ducati.
Negative: @enigmeow warns against cold starting the bike if it hasn't been run in a decade, cautioning that the engine might suffer from old fuel and coolant. @enthusiastic_enthusiast stresses that the bike has not been started for the listing to avoid risks of engine damage, which could deter some potential buyers who would prefer assurance of fully operational performance. @ForrestGump mentions the high bidding price and suggests that the competition for the bike is intense, hinting at possible price inflation or overvaluation concerns.
|
Individual Royal Red Metallic 34k-Mile 2001 BMW 330xi Sport Sedan 5-Speed
WBAAV53401JR80081
Lot 210562
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and status as a modern classic. @ldl20 noted that it is a "beautiful car that should do quite well", while @BlueBimmers described it as "gorgeous" and mentioned its maintenance history as promising. @mk7Pilot remarked on the car's solid feel and fun driving experience, indicating a personal connection to the model. The seller, @enthusiastic_enthusiast, responded positively to inquiries, emphasizing that the vehicle is a "total time capsule" and sharing excitement about its features and future with a new owner. Overall, there is a strong appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and performance potential among commenters.
Neutral: Several comments focused on specific details and inquiries rather than outright praise or criticism. @T5ing noted the complexity of the all-wheel-drive system, showing a preference for simplicity while still acknowledging the car's attractiveness. @RWRWilliam asked for clarification regarding repairs, particularly concerning the window fix and whether it included an actual bill or just a receipt. @jbirnie inquired about the rear seats, seeking functional details rather than opinions about the car's overall condition. These neutral comments reflect a mix of curiosity and considerations that future buyers might have without strong emotional responses either way.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle that tempered the overall enthusiasm. @BlueBimmers cautioned about the age of the tires, suggesting they might set off alarm bells for potential buyers, while also mentioning that AWD cars from this era tended to ride too high, proposing aftermarket solutions. @ruhollah pointed out potential issues, questioning whether a CV boot was torn and the condition of the spring seat, indicating that not all details were perfect. Additionally, @rmxtgh expressed skepticism about the car's potential sale price, suggesting it might not reach expectations, marking a more reserved or critical viewpoint amid the generally positive commentary on the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @cocomats noted that the white on blue color combination for the convertible is indeed underrated, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @GDogg described the Volante V8 in Status White as absolutely stunning, praising the way the blue top and interior complement the car beautifully. Overall, these comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's design and color scheme.
Neutral: @Gdhour expressed a desire to see the car in person, indicating interest from potential buyers. @Sweepstakes1901 (The Seller) responded to questions regarding engine replacement and service records, demonstrating transparency about the car's history. The seller reassured that all necessary information is being posted and that the community's inquiries are valued, keeping the conversation informative and engaging.
Negative: @Hardhead7525 and @eshum raised concerns about the engine replacement, questioning why it wasn't included in previous summaries and referencing potential water damage from a hurricane. @Mitleider inquired about the title status, which could imply serious concerns about the car's history. Additionally, @eshum suggested skepticism regarding the previous owner's actions, implying that the dealership may not have been forthright in disclosing the engine replacement, raising doubts about the integrity of the sale process.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlight the appealing aesthetics and unique features of the vehicle. @Legto finds it a neat-looking car, especially noting the intact catalytic converter. @CarDogThreePedals praises the blending of sporty design with wood-grained accents, while @LB1 admires the sharp front end and hideaway tailgate. @JaDawgPNW expresses excitement at the prospect of taking a road trip in this classic, and @e9er appreciates the striking colors and options available in the car, calling it one of the best-looking vehicles compared to its contemporaries. Many commenters reflect on personal memories associated with similar cars, highlighting their nostalgic appeal.
Neutral: Comments also provide neutral reflections mostly related to the car's features and history. @Grimsby (The Seller) details the car's condition, mentioning it has original paint with some touch-ups, and describes the operational aspects of the vehicle. @200mph discusses the connection to the Daytona 500, noting that the car could have had a special history in its day. @starvoyager shows concern over potential rattles observed during a drive video, to which Grimsby responds with clarifications. @HTL2 inquires about air conditioning ducts for rear seat passengers, reflecting a practical concern for potential buyers.
Negative: Skeptical comments highlight perceived drawbacks and concerns about the vehicle's age. @Dougdodge1 remarks on the steep price point for a wagon in 1976, indicating it was likely viewed as expensive for its time. @AvantiII notes the absence of cornering lights, referencing a feature that might have improved the vehicle's functionality. @Longmire45 raises concerns about oil types that could affect the catalytic converter, suggesting confusion around maintenance for such an older model. Overall, while many appreciate the car's features and history, there are practical concerns regarding the car's upkeep due to its age.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the classic 1954 Chevrolet Corvette, noting its gorgeous appearance and rich history. @HeyNk appreciates the classiness of earlier Corvette models, while @C1C5Bud highlights the strong potential this vehicle has for restoration, especially with its correct engine and transmission castings. @Fastlane27 and others show enthusiasm for the auction, engaging positively in the bidding process, implying a strong interest in the car.
Neutral: @2FAM (The Seller) provides insights into their operations, stating that they are a family-owned business with experience in selling and servicing various makes and models since 1978. They also mention that their vehicles are meticulously cared for, being stored in climate-controlled facilities and cleaned prior to sale. The seller interacts with potential buyers by offering to provide additional photos of the vehicle and clarifying operational aspects regarding viewings and transportation.
Negative: There are concerns raised by commenters about the vehicle's replacement VIN tag, particularly from @Rockg and @52farmtruck. @Rockg questions the reason behind the replacement VIN tag, while @52farmtruck expresses confusion about the seller's lack of response regarding this issue. These questions indicate some unease regarding the car's authenticity and background which could affect potential buyers' trust.
|
 |
Positive: @Snowcapmotorsinc highlights the 2013 Porsche Cayenne Diesel as a well-maintained vehicle with a clean history and title, exciting potential buyers with its recent repairs and maintenance. The seller emphasizes the car's reliability and quality, noting the recent $3,000 worth of work carried out including a new radiator and cleaning of the air conditioning condenser. Indeed, the seller portrays it as an appealing option for anyone in the market for a Diesel Cayenne, reflecting confidence in the car’s condition.
Neutral: @clemente102 inquires about the number of keys and specifics concerning the tires, demonstrating interest in practical details about the vehicle. The seller responds, confirming that only one key is included as well as providing the tire brand, Yokohama Geolander, and their recent DOT code indicating they have relatively low mileage. This exchange illustrates a potential buyer weighing the specifics of the vehicle amidst a general interest in its maintenance history and features.
Negative: @jvmax raises a concern regarding a specific diesel recall not mentioned in the vehicle’s description, indicating a possible oversight in informing prospective buyers about all aspects of the Cayenne's history. This lack of clarity could lead to concerns about the vehicle's past and readiness, reflecting a critical viewpoint on how comprehensive the seller has been in disclosing all necessary information about recalls that may affect the buyer's decision.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the beauty and appeal of the vehicle, with @BMW88E28 expressing fond memories of a similar car from their past and wishing all the best for the sale. @Erioc appreciates the details, noting the correct rear bumper overriders, and offers goodwill for the auction. @Bad70RR describes the car as a 'real honey' suggesting it is quite a desirable model, while @jpr shares excitement about the possibility of driving the car frequently. Overall, many users, including @mhwhite63 and @mick59, emphasize the well-done restoration and modifications that make this '67 Bug special and worth attention.
Neutral: Some comments offer neutral observations and inquiries about the vehicle's condition. @KentGV points out a spelling error on a decal that could be removed, while @AvionicsTech questions whether specific cabin heat parts are missing, indicating a need for clarification regarding the restoration details. @Kaseynesselrotte (The Seller) addresses these concerns, indicating they will inspect the cracked door hinge and clarify that it's a paint issue, not structural. Similarly, @azoldtoys poses several questions about the vehicle's historical aspects and mechanical condition, to which the seller responds with assurance about minor oil leaks and confirmation of a clear title.
Negative: Negative comments criticize specific aspects of the vehicle's condition or the information provided. @weazelvail expresses concern about the seriousness of the cracked door hinge, reflecting skepticism about the car's overall care. @oldandhyper questions the legitimacy of the alumni photos compared to the current images, hinting at discrepancies. Although @Dougiejak and @TTSAudi engage in a light-hearted disagreement about which Volkswagen model is superior, it reflects differing opinions among enthusiasts, suggesting that while the car is loved, it might not appeal to every vintage car aficionado.
|
 |
Positive: @Casti4355 (The Seller) presents the Targa 4S as a phenomenal car with excellent specifications and low mileage, highlighting its standout presence within the Porsche lineup. Commenters like @Conw5254 express admiration for the Targa's design and retractable roof, while @Randy56 praises the seller's transparency and meticulous ownership. @emanrace also appreciates the beautiful build and combination of options, contributing to the car's timeless appeal. Overall, there is a strong consensus among enthusiasts about the desirability and quality of this vehicle, particularly its striking aesthetics and performance capabilities.
Neutral: The seller shares a detailed history of the vehicle, noting that they are the third owner and have cared for the car since July 2023. They provide insights into its maintenance, including a chronological file of service records and additional warranties. Several bidders express interest in specific features, like the roof liner replacement, potential horsepower upgrades, and driving videos, which the seller promises to accommodate. Comments about the absence of certain modern features like CarPlay point to the understanding that some elements may be less appealing compared to contemporary models.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @SCDrew regarding the condition of the roof and potential wear, to which @Casti4355 responded affirmatively but assured that the top does not require replacement. A brief mention of a lien on the vehicle by @emonomics could dissuade some buyers, though the seller clarifies the situation. Additionally, @sonomamikeh inquires about common dash lifting problems in this vintage, pointing to possible issues that may deter certain buyers despite the overall positive feedback.
|
 |
Positive: @Tashakes commented that it is a lovely car which could benefit from better presentation, suggesting that someone might get a great deal. @westcoastcars noted the rarity of No Reserve Aston Martins, indicating that this car could be a valuable opportunity for buyers. @Mniccoli (The Seller) acknowledged the feedback about the vehicle needing a wash, admitting to being unprepared for the photos, which shows a willingness to engage positively with commentors.
Neutral: @meb mentioned that with 7 owners, the car has been through many hands but still has a low mileage of 25k, which raises questions about its care and cleaning history. @NotTellinYou echoed these concerns by pointing out the dirt that obscured the view of the vehicle's finish, suggesting that the current state makes it hard to assess its quality. @watherton inquired about service records and the user manual, indicating a desire for more transparency regarding the car's maintenance history.
Negative: @Rorin67 expressed disappointment about the vehicle's cleanliness and stated that it merits a wash before further photos are taken. This comment reflects a broader sentiment that the car's presentation needs improvement. @Jamesk58's remark that the car is "looking for some love" adds to the concerns about the overall condition and driveability of the vehicle, reinforcing the perception that it has not been well-maintained.
|
 |
Positive: @Wob (The Seller) conveyed a strong sense of enjoyment regarding this vehicle, highlighting it as light-hearted, spirited, and fun to drive. They emphasized that it offers something for every car enthusiast, mentioning the significant investment that has gone into the car and expressing a desire to enhance the auction experience by providing thorough information to potential bidders. The seller promotes clear communication, encouraging bidders to reach out with questions or to introduce themselves, which contributes to a welcoming environment.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @cpecos and @jjeremyw04, expressed anticipation for the upcoming videos and additional media showcasing the vehicle, indicating an interest in understanding its performance better. There was a mix of inquiries about the vehicle's modifications, storage options after purchase, and specifics regarding emissions compliance, which reflect both eagerness and some uncertainty about the vehicle's capabilities. @no.radar raised questions about the Check Engine light and emissions status, which were addressed by @Wob as a typo, clarifying that the light was simply displayed due to the ignition being on without the engine running.
Negative: Concerns were raised by various commenters about the vehicle's ability to meet California emissions standards, particularly from @Cpark352 and others, questioning whether modifications have rendered the vehicle non-compliant. This raises potential issues for local buyers, as indicated by the stipulation that no California private buyers would be accepted without certainty regarding emissions. Additionally, @no.radar's initial inquiry about the Check Engine light reflects a general apprehension about potential mechanical issues, which may deter some bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @ridewhencan noted the beauty of the car and expressed excitement about such low mileage on a 2011 Evora S, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @3Pedalonly highlighted the car's legendary driving experience, expressing disbelief that it had been left un-driven for so long. @Slang500 (The Seller) provided clarity on the car's history, explaining it was part of a collection left behind by a family who moved to London, and demonstrated commitment by changing all fluids before starting it. This reassured potential buyers about the car's condition.
Neutral: Several comments expressed curiosity about the car's backstory and the owner's decision to leave it in storage for so long. @Tghooper questioned why someone would own a Lotus and not drive it. @Dave_L and @CoopCity both remarked on the need for more details surrounding the past ownership, suggesting it would be beneficial for potential buyers to hear more context about the original owners. Some users, like @Goodbacon, commented on pricing strategies related to the auction format and the rarity of Evora listings, indicating a broader market perspective.
Negative: Several commenters raised concerns about the risks associated with purchasing a car that has sat idle for an extended period. @fox4gib lamented that potential issues could arise from it sitting un-driven, such as needing refurbishment for safety. @BrokeIt questioned why similar storage issues seem more accepted for cars than motorcycles, implying skepticism about long-term inactivity. Additionally, @eddieenygma brought up worries regarding potential legal complications related to the original owner's abrupt departure, indicating a lack of peace of mind about the car's past.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's combination of features and characteristics. @FirehouseVintage (The Seller) highlighted the first year C4's great driver quality and appealing gold metallic color, encouraging potential buyers to bid and offering transparent communication about any inquiries. @pmafterdark and @mele appreciated the great color, cloth interior, and manual transmission, considering them winning features that enhance the car's overall appeal. @JustaHonda also emphasized the unique charm of this first-year C4, describing it as both ugly and beautiful, and a collector's dream in remarkable condition.
Neutral: Several people offered insights about specific details of the car that may impact potential buyers. @8tony requested additional pictures of the broadcast label, which is an essential part of the car's history, and @E-TypeOTS and @kinglaw discussed the Z51 specifications and noted the absence of certain details in the listing description. @mikeeby reminisced about owning a similar model, sharing his nostalgia over its well-preserved condition and history, while @jonfrancis inquired whether the car was equipped with R134 A/C, receiving confirmation from the seller.
Negative: A minority of comments voiced concerns or criticisms regarding the vehicle. @neverenoughgold reflected on their past experience with a similar model, noting that while it was fun to drive, the suspension left much to be desired. @JustaHonda made a playful remark on the car's appearance, labeling it kitschy and referencing its unique aesthetic. Additionally, there was some expressed disappointment about the initial write-up missing key details, particularly regarding the Z51 option, which some commenters felt was an oversight in the seller's description.
|
2002 Ford F-250 Super Duty Lariat SuperCab Power Stroke 4×4 6-Speed
1FTNX21F62EB91218
Lot 210575
Dealer
 |
Positive: @jamin87ss commented on the vehicle's aesthetics, calling it a "beauty," and @maw06 praised the truck's good looks and well-maintained interior, specifically noting the appealing color combination. @Todd_Z. expressed admiration for the rarity of the Lariat configuration with a 6-speed manual shift t-case, and @Barneymp recognized the reliability of the 7.3 engine, stating it can handle demanding tasks. @valpomike stated that the truck is "really nice," expressing an interest in closely monitoring it despite reservations about trading his own vehicle.
Neutral: Comments from @vintage-mech and @kubotaorange76 sought technical details, specifically regarding the catalytic converter status, tire sizes, and modifications made to the truck, indicating an interest in the vehicle's specs and condition. @tifjeslil (The Seller) responded to inquiries, confirming the catalytic converter is present and provided tire specifications. The discussion continued with @meissen_540 asking about additional components like the starter relay and fog light control, showcasing a curiosity about the vehicle's features without any strong bias towards it.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns or questions about the vehicle's condition and modifications. @vintage-mech specifically inquired about the presence of any engine modifications, while @meissen_540 and @Toddg24 sought records on servicing and any potential modifications like chips or power adders. @motts_applesauce's request for a video displaying engine blow-by suggests potential skepticism regarding the engine's performance, indicating a cautious approach to potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @steelergimp (The Seller) has highlighted the exceptional condition of the Mustang, noting that it has only 45,000 miles and feels showroom new. Commenters like @08GTCSstang and @Highline9 praised the vehicle for its beauty and condition, with @Highline9 also mentioning favorable upgrades and features. Overall, many buyers expressed enthusiasm about the car's pristine appearance and performance capabilities, specifically the solid horsepower of 300 and torque of 320 pounds.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding the history of the vehicle and its ownership. @Spike53 questioned why the seller was parting with the car after only six weeks, to which @steelergimp explained that his wife initially wanted a stick-shift Mustang but quickly preferred switching to an automatic. @BizJetTech raised concerns about the Carfax report indicating multiple previous owners, prompting @steelergimp to clarify the car's origins and the ownership timeline.
Negative: There were some concerns about transparency regarding the vehicle's ownership history and condition. @BizJetTech pointed out discrepancies in the ownership details based on previous listings, prompting an explanation from @steelergimp. Additionally, @knulp raised questions about the required catalytic converters, indicating worries about compliance with regulations in California. Overall, while the car is highly praised, there are lingering uncertainties among potential buyers about its past and compliance.
|
 |
Positive: @ibgpin praises the vehicle as a very nice Jeep, specifically noting the appeal of the P1 Black Laredo model. @AKLeader also expresses admiration for the condition of the classic Jeep, highlighting the impressive preservation of original parts and especially favors the black Laredos from 1984 to 1986. @ShaneCates (The Seller) responds positively to questions about the vehicle's features, assuring potential buyers of the Jeep's capabilities and quality, stating that it runs amazingly and confirming that many original components are intact.
Neutral: @dbennish inquires about the rear AMC20 axle and the date codes on the Cepek tires, indicating a practical interest in specific features. @clemsonman asks for information about the functioning of the A/C and the inclusion of factory wheels, showing curiosity about the vehicle's functional aspects. @ToyBox1 questions the paint job details and the performance of the Holley Sniper EFT, seeking more technical information relevant to potential buyers.
Negative: @Col.Forbin raises concerns regarding why the term 'rebuilt' cannot be used in the listing for the Jeep's engine, suggesting that this could mislead prospective bidders. @ShaneCates (The Seller) acknowledges the restrictions imposed by BAT on the listing language, indicating a frustration with how the information is presented. @Mychordistooshort mentions that original paint should show clear spot welds, hinting at potential concerns about the vehicle's originality and condition.
|
 |
Positive: The feedback from several commentors reflects a general appreciation for the vehicle's overall condition and history. @C3Lee noted that despite the hood gap issue, the car appears to be pristine and unaltered, emphasizing its desirable color and the interesting ownership trajectory. @skycranekid echoed this sentiment, highlighting that the hood alignment is fixable and commending the car's cleanliness, suggesting it indeed shows low mileage despite some discrepancies. Additionally, @K-FNovi (The Seller) provided insights about the care taken with the car, discussing the recent maintenance and the high-quality condition of the vehicle, including the need for initial adjustments that he has already started to work on.
Neutral: There are comments addressing specific concerns regarding the hood gap, which multiple users noted upon inspection. @TheSimonisFamily and @Jeepmike were among the first to question whether the hood was fully closed, with @sserafini expressing concern that if properly closed, the vehicle might not have true low mileage. @K-FNovi (The Seller) responded to these inquiries by insisting the car is in near-perfect condition and explained the quirks of the fiberglass hood and its adjustments, providing detailed context for the hood issue and asserting that the mileage discrepancy noted in Carfax needs correction but does not reflect actual wear and tear.
Negative: Some comments indicate skepticism regarding the vehicle's stated low mileage and suggest potential concerns over the hood gap. @sserafini implied that the visible gap could be indicative of the car not having been well taken care of during its life, positing that this could signify either an error in mileage reporting or a history of rough use. Furthermore, @C3Lee cautioned that these alignment issues could affect the perceived value of the auction if not addressed properly, suggesting the seller might need to make further adjustments before final bids are placed, expressing concern for the potential impact on a top-dollar sale due to these visual inconsistencies.
|
 |
Positive: @jam583 believes that the model years 2007-2009 represent the best of the L322s, expressing high regard for this vehicle type. @WAGONBOYTD appreciates the example provided and notes typical wear on brake pads due to the vehicle's heavy build. Multiple comments highlight the exceptional condition of the vehicle, with @roverlover06 referring to it as pristine and @Vols4Life noting its 'brand spanking new' appearance. @OhU8one2 remarks on its maintenance, indicating that it is well cared for and suggesting it's one of the best models available.
Neutral: @Classiccarmaverick and @AAvey inquire about the vehicle's cleanliness and maintenance service, reflecting curiosity about its upkeep rather than outright criticism. @MightyMo (The Seller) clarifies that no dry ice was used in cleaning, opting instead for standard detailing methods. @bearden and @MMcCleskey express interest in obtaining videos showing various functionalities of the vehicle, indicating that they seek reassurance about its operations without providing a strong opinion on the vehicle's quality.
Negative: @CHUCKOUTALUCK seems skeptical about the vehicle's capability to make a journey back home without issues, questioning potential deficiencies, though the seller offers reassurance. The comment hints at a concern for potential hidden problems. @MightyMo (The Seller) counters this by stating that the truck is mechanically excellent, which might mitigate fears but also responds to the negative perception introduced by @CHUCKOUTALUCK.
|
 |
Positive: @vfnrcc (The Seller) provides a welcoming and enthusiastic introduction to the vehicle, emphasizing their extensive experience in the car industry and dedication to quality. They reassure potential buyers that the vehicle has undergone a thorough test drive and is in impeccable condition, also stating that they have confidence in its quality with a no reserve sale. Positive engagement is reflected in comments like @JeffreyFl's appreciation of the driving video, indicating that it met high standards for showcasing the vehicle's performance.
Neutral: There is a mix of inquiries about specific features of the vehicle, such as the condition of the air conditioning system and materials used in the interior. @Boulderman asks about the AC and hardtop stand, while @mturneymd and @ArizonaJason raise questions about the dashboard material and radio functionality, respectively. @Jonfrancis is curious about the conversion of the AC system to r134 and the interaction between the soft and hard tops, reflecting a keen interest in the vehicle's specifications and features without any negative connotation.
Negative: While the seller provides thorough information, there are a few points of concern raised by potential buyers. @Boulderman highlights the lack of a hardtop stand, which must be sourced separately, and also queries about service documents for verification of mileage. Additionally, @Jonfrancis expresses concern regarding the cost of converting AC systems, suggesting it may be a financial burden for potential buyers. Overall, while there are no outright complaints, these comments reflect hesitance regarding specific details of the vehicle's features.
|
 |
Positive: @pcchuck remarked on the vehicle's beauty, expressing that it was the kind of car he would have loved to own after serving in the Army in '71. @FalconFlyer praised the exterior color and noted that the white seats looked very clean for their age, calling it a great-looking vehicle. @Acorn19 appreciated the car overall, remarking that it checks all the boxes and the problems identified seem to be easy fixes.
Neutral: @MartinV63, the seller, provided an informative response to questions from the community, acknowledging that the car's air conditioning, horn, and turn signals are not functioning properly. He also mentioned that the seat belts will not be installed but will be included in the sale. Additionally, he addressed inquiries about the car's potential wear and the challenges of long-distance travel, indicating that while it could drive, there were several uncertainties about its condition.
Negative: @rzuchowicz pointed out multiple issues with the vehicle, including non-functional components like the A/C, horn, and the place of the seat belts. Other comments raised concerns about the door panels being riveted and the accuracy of the odometer reading, suggesting potential hidden problems. @Jtrnt247 noted the likelihood of having to address the vehicle's interior updates, implying that there might be more work required to ensure the car's full functionality.
|
 |
Positive: @Gmmuscleusa noted that there are a lot of nice features on the truck, indicating a good physical condition and appealing design. @joeInOh expressed a strong desire for the vehicle, stating, "I NEED this!" This enthusiasm for the truck suggests it has qualities that attract potential buyers. @06Sapper mentioned that the truck already runs and drives well, appreciating the significant investment made in new parts, which is a major advantage for prospective owners.
Neutral: @Whatialwayssaid provided insight into the manufacturing process of the brake brackets, noting their origins in Canton, Ohio, which may suggest a level of quality. @Jho-ptown inquired about the paperwork that accompanied the vehicle upon purchase, showing interest in its history and documentation. @Colinscc asked for confirmation regarding the vehicle's location and registration status, which reflects a typical concern among buyers ensuring the vehicle meets local requirements and is conveniently accessible.
Negative: @Donjr1952 raised a concern about a potential leak, pointing out the cardboard placed under the front end, which might suggest some mechanical issues. @notlikelytowin4 gave a heads up about the ride quality of military humvees, describing it as "rough and jarring," warning potential buyers about its driveability and comfort level. @Eolmos (The Seller) acknowledged that there are parts needed for completion, hinting at remaining work necessary to bring the truck to its full potential, which may deter some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @MontanaBroncos commented positively on the vehicle's great colors and noted its clean condition given the mileage and total loss declaration. @5960Taho praised the Bronco as very clean and suggested it looks like it has received good care over time. Additionally, @mtr25 expressed admiration for the beautiful bronco and its colors, highlighting its aesthetic appeal, while @GoldNi0020 described it as legendary and the perfect beach house truck, emphasizing the features that would enhance its usability.
Neutral: @nealcannon16, the seller, shared that the truck's original color was maintained since they purchased it in 2018 and mentioned a lack of knowledge regarding the total loss declaration's cause. They performed inspections with a mechanic and a body shop but found no issues. Other commenters such as @natew51 and @Dfhodg inquired about the vehicle's history and damages leading to its classification as a total loss, indicating curiosity about its background without negative connotations. @croozn33 asked whether the bonded title affects the vehicle's insurability, raising practical concerns.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Dfhodg regarding the vehicle’s history as a potential flood car and its total loss classification, suggesting skepticism about its condition. @acarney44 pointed out that there might be an issue with the shocks, implying potential mechanical problems noticed from the images. Additionally, @FW_BRONC commented on the implications of a total loss and bonded title, and @mtr25 alluded to the possibility of transmission issues, questioning the transmission's rebuild status and suggesting that it typically requires rebuilding around that age.
|
 |
Positive: @bimbettocavallo praises the car as a masterpiece of design, highlighting its comfort and reliability. @dhunt750 calls it a stunning vehicle, emphasizing that there is nothing Junior about these cars. @Alfalfanut admires the great lines of the vehicle, while @OssoBene notes its desirability as a European car with distinctive Italian features and points out the comfort of the seats as exceptional. Overall, several commenters reflect on the nostalgia and enjoyable driving experiences associated with owning a similar Alfa Romeo.
Neutral: @Annexhouston, the seller, provides detailed information about the car's history, confirming they are the second owner in the U.S. and noting a lack of service records from the previous owner. They acknowledge the existence of minor concerns regarding possible corrosion observed by @tb1999 but suggest these are manageable issues that do not compromise the overall condition of the car. @DesertMaxi, a potential bidder, expresses interest in the vehicle but indicates they have not made progress on a similar car in Italy.
Negative: @tb1999 raises concerns about rust observed on certain parts of the vehicle, suggesting remedial work may be needed to preserve its integrity. @ww22ww and @meccano express skepticism regarding the auction's bidding pattern, questioning the sudden increase in bid amounts. Similarly, @OssoBene expresses frustration over the bidding increments, implying that it may dilute the auction experience and seems overly casual for such a prized vehicle. Overall, some commenters are cautious about potential hidden issues and the auction dynamics.
|
 |
Positive: @djplumley shares a heartfelt story about his father's craftsmanship in building the Glitterbug in 1967, highlighting the vehicle's unique design and attention to detail. The car has been lovingly refurbished after being idle for 20 years, and @djplumley expresses hope that the next owner will enjoy it as much as his family did. Commenters, including @eldonchas, praise the tasteful build and design elements of the Glitterbug, suggesting it stands out compared to other models like the Meyer’s Manx.
Neutral: The vehicle's refurbishment appears to have been thorough, with @djplumley listing a significant number of repairs and upgrades, including new parts for the brakes, suspension, fuel and ignition system, and electrical components. This methodical approach aims to maintain the car's originality while ensuring it is safe and operational. A few bidders inquire about the car's viability for street use, indicating some potential concerns about the fuel tank modifications and their compliance with regulations.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the compression in one cylinder as noted by @IdahoBill, who mentioned that his mechanic is wary of the readings and the potential costs for repairs. @djplumley acknowledged these worries, stating that the low compression was expected given the car's history of being unused, and suggested a simple drive may resolve the issue. However, uncertainty remains about the vehicle's long-term reliability, especially considering its age and the modifications made.
|
 |
Positive: The 1967 Chevelle for auction has received a lot of compliments regarding its stunning appearance and impressive build quality. @boaboyoz called it a "killer Cali Chevelle Malibu" and noted its fantastic build, while @TheBerthaCar praised @johnnyvett as an excellent seller with great attention to detail. Commentators like @palturner echoed praise by stating that the car not only looks great but sounds great too, highlighting its factory A/C that blows cold. Overall, many users express excitement about the car and highlight the nostalgia associated with owning a Chevelle.
Neutral: There's a level of confusion regarding the use of SS badging on the Malibu, with users like @LeoMedina questioning its authenticity. However, @johnnyvett clarified that the car is a 136 model, which would classify it as a Malibu rather than an SS. This point sparked a conversation about the differences in trim levels and potential for clones and tributes, with users sharing insights and personal anecdotes regarding their own Chevelle experiences. Many in the comments express a shared appreciation for the Chevelle lineage, suggesting a mixed but generally respectful narrative about the vehicle's identity.
Negative: A few concerns were raised during the auction, particularly about aesthetic issues that could detract from the car's value. @RickDLeonard pointed out the misalignment of the right headlight bezel and issues with the vinyl top molding. Although not seen as major flaws, they reflect the natural wear expected in a classic vehicle over 50 years old. @boaboyoz humorously noted the red light incident from a previous comment, conveying that this Chevelle has quite the story and presence, but other participants echoed concerns about its imperfections. Despite these criticisms, @johnnyvett was responsive to inquiries, emphasizing the car's charm despite potential flaws.
|
 |
Positive: @lovetodriveoldcars is proud to represent this exceptional vehicle, emphasizing that it was well-maintained and has a clean Carfax without any incidents at the point of purchase. Commenters like @jsilver212 and @RecoveringAtty highlight the appealing specifications of the car, noting features like the sport seats and GT3 wheels. @01996tt and @bmdaia express excitement about the 996TT model being back on the market, with @voitureltd acknowledging the rarity of both air-cooled and water-cooled turbo models available for sale.
Neutral: The seller, @lovetodriveoldcars, has addressed potential concerns surrounding the Carfax report by clarifying the ownership history and providing additional documentation, including paint meter readings and a DME report. Comments from various users suggest a request for further details and confirmations about factory equipment and specific functionalities of the car. @alw600 asks for a video of the convertible top, while @voitureltd inquires about the operation of the rear spoiler, indicating a measured interest in the car's various features.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, some comments express a lack of enthusiasm. @mshobe expresses indifference towards the GT Silver color, stating "GT Silver (YAWN)." There seems to be some frustration regarding the Carfax situation, as @voitureltd appears to have missed the factory equipment details, leading to questions about transparency. Additionally, the need for the seller to repeatedly clarify points regarding ownership and incident reports suggests some skepticism among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Stevcro, the seller, highlighted the car's long-term care, stating that it has been garage-kept and only driven from May to September for the last 20 years. This information may help reassure potential buyers about the vehicle's overall condition, exemplifying the owner's dedication to maintenance.
Neutral: @Powershouse expressed interest in inspecting the car, to which @Stevcro promptly responded with an invitation for a test drive and inspection. @Lengrep also shared insights regarding maintenance needs, noting common issues and recommending specific parts that could enhance the vehicle's presentation and value without sounding overly critical.
Negative: @Turbo-Z pointed out that the vehicle could benefit from detailing, suggesting that a clean engine compartment could significantly improve its appeal at auction. @Lengrep also mentioned a few cosmetic issues, including the need for a rear plastic window replacement and concerns about the engine compartment's cleanliness, which he felt did not reflect the level of care the vehicle has received.
|
 |
Positive: @Leica1963 shared a nostalgic sentiment, mentioning learning to drive on one of these vehicles. @packardv8 praised the tractor, recalling it as the best all-around small farm tractor they've ever encountered. This kind of appreciation suggests a strong legacy and positive experiences associated with this type of vehicle.
Neutral: @BMcD requested a cold start or driving video, indicating an interest in witnessing the vehicle in action. @jlk1224 inquired about the refurbishment timeline, illustrating a desire for more information about the vehicle's condition and updates.
Negative: @jlk1224 also asked for specifics regarding what modifications were made during the refurbishment, pointing towards potential concerns about the quality or extent of the work done. However, @Jborriello (The Seller) responded by clarifying that the vehicle underwent significant improvements, including sandblasting, painting, new tires, and an engine rebuild.
|
 |
Positive: @allwheelsinc (The Seller) assures that the vehicle has never been smoked in, indicating it has been maintained in good condition. They offer to provide a video demonstrating the operation of the soft top, suggesting that it functions well without issues. Additionally, they emphasize that the vehicle shows nicely despite the close-up photos that may exaggerate the blemishes.
Neutral: Several comments express confusion regarding the presence of a hardtop for the vehicle, with @MGW-Fla asking directly about it. @MikeNoLomotel points out that there are plenty of OEM hardtops available for purchase, indicating there is interest in enhancing the vehicle's features. @Bourbaki expresses uncertainty about the exact location of the long scratch referred to in previous comments, which suggests some ambiguity in the condition descriptions provided.
Negative: @RTH5555 raises concerns about the significant scratches on the vehicle, suggesting that these cosmetic issues could lower the auction value significantly, estimating repair costs to bring the car back to pristine condition to be between $3-$5k. They also note that for a car with only 18k miles, the wear is substantial. Overall, there seems to be a mixed perception of the vehicle's condition, with some comments highlighting potential issues that could detract from its appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @Ukodonnell03 praises the vehicle's suspension mods and design, expressing enthusiasm for the overall work done on the car. @pwmac and @Yagottabkiddin also compliment the build, highlighting its appealing aesthetics and noting it would fit well with other classic cars. Overall, there is a clear appreciation for the car's appearance and craftsmanship.
Neutral: The seller, @General1, provides detailed explanations regarding the car's VIN and build plate, mentioning modifications due to a previous dash fire. They plan to create a driving video soon to showcase the car's performance, satisfying requests for a demonstration of how it drives. Additional inquiries about features, such as the red stripe's application and badge placements, show curiosity about the vehicle's modifications and authenticity.
Negative: @hairyolds points out a concern regarding the placement of emblems on the car, suggesting they are too high despite acknowledging the car's quality. @neomusclefan raises questions about the functionality of basic features like the AC, heat, and wipers, casting a shadow on the car's operational integrity. Meanwhile, @Robear442 asks about the legality of registering the car with its rebuilt title, indicating potential issues regarding its status.
|
 |
Positive: @enthusiastic_enthusiast expressed excitement about hosting the auction for the beautiful Fat Bob and emphasized the positive future ahead for the vehicle. The seller highlighted their experience as a trusted vendor with over 150 completed auctions, aiming to make the process smooth for buyers and sellers. They also appreciated the community's engagement and encouraged potential buyers to inspect the vehicle either in person or through FaceTime, fostering a transparent and inviting atmosphere.
Neutral: Comments from users like @Jimm1900 and @eurosepu focused on the request for additional content, specifically motor running and riding videos, which indicates a desire for more detailed information about the vehicle's performance. The seller acknowledged these requests and assured that the overview video, including various aspects like a walk-around and cold start, was forthcoming, showing responsiveness to the audience's needs.
Negative: There were no significant negative comments regarding the vehicle or the auction listing. The comments primarily revolved around requests for more videos and information, with no complaints or criticisms noted from the buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz praises the vehicle, describing it as a "fierce Florida Camaro" with a "killer build." @Arthoelderlin (The Seller) mentions that the car starts, runs, and drives great, highlighting the upgrade to sniper fuel injection and ignition which enhances both startup and drivability. Enthusiasts appreciate the aesthetic aspects, with @oklahomie complimenting the high-back front seats and @mdmclane noting their similarity to BMW M3 seats, indicating that the vehicle has a well-thought-out design and appealing interior features.
Neutral: @Arthoelderlin (The Seller) shares limited information regarding the car's history, explaining that it was built by a previous owner who passed away. The seller clarifies that although the car has heating and air conditioning, it is not often needed in Florida, and acknowledges the lack of documentation like a build sheet or dyno numbers. Several commenters express curiosity about the specifics of the vehicle, such as @CaliLou asking for a build sheet and dyno numbers, while @PSFarm inquires about the authenticity of the L88 engine designation in relation to the vehicle's value.
Negative: Concerns are raised by @Lurvey regarding the apparent absence of a heater core, while @JBplays questions the relevance of the 5-year-old video included in the listing, seeking clarification on its age. @MissC629 asks if there are any issues with the car, prompting @Arthoelderlin (The Seller) to assure that in their opinion, there is nothing wrong with it. Nonetheless, the inquiries about engine specifics and heater functionality hint at a need for more detailed information about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Jrosero59 describes the vehicle as "Beauty incarnate!" showing strong admiration for its aesthetics, while @PeachStateClassics appreciates the rare factory color combination of Raven Black with Ivy Gold interior, noting its uniqueness and backing it up with the Marti report that confirms low production numbers for this combo. The seller, @Krobsklassics, reinforces the authenticity of the vehicle by confirming it is a factory fastback and not a coupe conversion, further detailing its original specifications and inviting potential buyers to ask questions.
Neutral: @EviLBlacK raises a valid point about the engine swap, noting it may not be the correct S code yet still acknowledging the appealing nature of the replacement engine. @mathbac seeks clarification on the origins of the front seats and suggests they might not be factory; @tnford agrees that the seats resemble those from a 69/70 Mach 1. @midwestfordman points out potential issues with the exhaust bending, and @fordoiler identifies the engine as a 351 Cleveland.
Negative: Concerns about modifications are shared by @mlesko73 and @GLWTA, who express disappointment over the swap from a 4-speed gearbox to an automatic transmission, as well as the removal of the center console, which seems counter to the vehicle's performance-oriented original order. @Ozzybud criticizes the torque box replacement work, suggesting it may lack proper welding, while @hiwaydrifter questions the vehicle's shifting ability based on a driving video, indicating dissatisfaction with its performance. Additionally, @Longmire45 suggests that the shock towers should be checked for cracks, highlighting apprehensions about the car's overall structural integrity.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments reflect a deep appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic and historical significance. @Brian88 refers to it as a "beautiful car" that invokes high school memories, and @1969HurstOlds calls it "sexy." @1971bigred442 praises the rarity of a black 70 SX W32 convertible, underscoring its desirability. Other commenters like @brobeson and @Earleo express their admiration for the restoration quality and modifications made, with @Johncristy noting the tasteful upgrades that enhance the driving experience without detracting from the car's originality. @hairyolds reminisces about a past experience with a similar model and acknowledges the current car as an outstanding example. Overall, the vehicle is seen as a unique and attractive classic model, capturing the interest of many enthusiasts.
Neutral: There are inquiries and observations regarding the vehicle's specifics and restoration processes. @Mgil2007 asks if the engine is numbers matching and requests a photo of the VIN on the engine block, while @Corlt1 inquires about the working condition of the A/C and its compatibility with the speaker. @Duamy poses questions about the restoration's details, including potential paint defects and the presence of orange peel. Sellers provide thorough responses, clarifying the vehicle's features, such as the A/C's cold performance and that the car underwent a comprehensive frame-off restoration. @JRPJR (The Seller) provides insight into upgrades and modifications, ensuring detailed information is available for prospective buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were voiced regarding specific vehicle aspects and restoration details. @1964Imperial pointed out potential issues such as an exhaust leak and misalignment of the hood and bumper, calling for clarity from the seller on various technical matters. @KRBaird criticized the quality of the driving video, suggesting it did not provide sufficient insight into the car’s performance, and emphasized the need for a more comprehensive demonstration during the drive. Furthermore, inquiries about the accuracy of the gas gauge and concerns about the car being presented as a "new" vehicle rather than a classic were mentioned by @thebigrig, who cautioned against overlooking potential issues that come with classic car ownership. Overall, these comments highlight the importance of transparency in the sale of classic cars, especially regarding their unique characteristics and maintenance needs.
|
 |
Positive: @wcclassics (The Seller) provides an enthusiastic overview of the 1951 Allard K2 Roadster, emphasizing its rarity and historical significance. The car is presented as a superb example, well-documented in Gavin Allard's book, which adds to its appeal for collectors and enthusiasts alike. The mention of its high-performance Cadillac V-8 engine and desirable design features like the side-exit exhaust and chrome wire wheels highlights its suitability for both shows and vintage racing events, making it a remarkable find for discerning collectors. Additionally, @Belabe54 expresses admiration by simply stating, "Incredible!".
Neutral: Several comments raise factual observations or inquiries related to the vehicle's description. @allardregister points out an inconsistency regarding the car's rear end, noting it has a live axle instead of a DeDion rear end as mentioned. @LM60 queries the timeline of the car's selling dealer, indicating a possible discrepancy with auction records. @TedLitvin notes the car was auctioned during Car Week, providing context about its recent trading history. Such comments suggest ongoing interest in the car, along with a community interaction focusing on clarification and accuracy in the listing.
Negative: @Artist70 expresses disappointment regarding the trend of quick flips in the vehicle market, suggesting that legitimate deals that were once common on BAT are now rare, indicating a perceived decline in the platform's quality or authenticity. This sentiment contrasts with the positive feedback surrounding the K2, hinting at broader concerns about the collector car community. Such observations may suggest that while some enthusiasts appreciate the vehicle, there are apprehensions about overall market practices resulting in a negative perception of the transaction environment.
|
 |
Positive: Commentators have shown a keen interest in the vehicle's features and functionality, with specific requests for information and documentation. @tifjeslil (The Seller) positively engaged with potential buyers by confirming that the vehicle was not smoked in, which is an important aspect for many buyers. Additionally, the seller noted they can reverse the lift to restore the vehicle to its stock height, demonstrating a willingness to accommodate different customer needs. They have also been proactive in sharing photos of the truck bed in response to inquiries, which reflects a commitment to transparency and customer service.
Neutral: There have been several inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition and past use. @GRNHELL asked about maintenance records and requested videos of the vehicle running and driving, indicating a desire for assurance about its reliability. Likewise, @tnguy931 inquired about shipping options, while @donemilio21 wanted clarification on rear seat functionality and additional imagery. These comments reflect potential buyers' need for more information before making a decision, which is common during the buying process.
Negative: There have been some concerns raised, though they are largely addressed by @tifjeslil (The Seller). @67COOP emphasized the need for driving videos and inquired about the vehicle's operation, suggesting a desire for confirmation that everything is functioning well. The seller reassured them by stating that everything works correctly but needs to catch up on providing the requested video. @jpmagatvpro1's question about smoking in the vehicle, while not negative, does indicate a level of caution from potential buyers regarding previous usage.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting its potential as a comfortable and stylish option for rural delivery, as highlighted by @bobrk. @Kampalakustomz, the seller, emphasized that the vehicle is an elegant delivery vehicle with ample space and horsepower, making it a practical choice. Additionally, @foreverzro praised it as the best version of the S3, while @Kampalakustomz confirmed that it features the desirable 225 engine, which is the same as that found in an Audi TT. Commenters appreciated the seller's readiness to provide driving videos and answer queries, creating a positive atmosphere around the auction.
Neutral: The seller, @Kampalakustomz, provided detailed information about the vehicle, including its clean title, history, and modifications. Questions posed by potential buyers included inquiries about the vehicle's ability to drive cross-country, with @keriksson considering a one-way trip. @pongdog shared insights from personal experience regarding steering in right-hand drive vehicles, and @bowza1785 asked about the exhaust system's condition and emissions testing history. These exchanges demonstrated that bidders were trying to gather important details before making a decision.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle, particularly around its maintenance history and potential issues that could arise due to its age. @pongdog questioned the documentation for oil changes and timing belt replacements, while @simonasaur asked about the check engine and EPS lights. Though @Kampalakustomz reassured potential buyers that these lights were not a concern, lingering doubt remained about the vehicle's reliability based on its age and the potential for hiccups during long drives, as mentioned by @keriksson.
|
 |
Positive: @Yagermeister21 (The Seller) received praise for the bike's appearance, with multiple commenters expressing admiration for its aesthetics. @Falcon900 noted the appealing components in pictures, suggesting they spark interest, while @chiplamb appreciated the bike's original handlebar design and mentioned options for customization. The seller further highlighted that the bike has been meticulously cared for, has a rare presence on the road, and is stored indoors, indicating its value as more than just a mode of transport but as a collectible art piece.
Neutral: Comments included inquiries about specific components and features of the bike. @chiplamb provided clarification about particular bike parts and modifications, confirming details about the handlebar risers and indicating the possibility of customizing the fairing. In addition, there were general discussions about the bike's weight and alternative features that may be appealing to potential buyers.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about possible modifications and the bike's condition. @RLB-427 questioned whether the seller was the original owner and identified non-original features like the rear fender and license plate holder. They also highlighted minor scratches on the side case, which led to inquiries about whether the bike had fallen over. Meanwhile, @berfinroy expressed skepticism about the current trend of flat paint schemes, questioning its allure.
|
 |
Positive: @Wob (The Seller) expresses excitement about the Falcon, emphasizing its exhilarating driving experience and the joy it brings. He describes the vehicle as a unique gem that not only looks great but also offers a top-tier driving adventure. There are numerous comments praising the car's distinctive qualities, describing it as an 'epic Falcon' and expressing eagerness for it to return, showcasing the car's desirability within the community and its ability to create lasting memories for its owners.
Neutral: Some comments raise questions about the vehicle's history and current condition, such as the minor rear end vibration and whether certain components are functioning properly. @sbmaine notes that the inability to correct such issues may limit the car's appeal to buyers, while others wonder how the car's previous ownership status affects its resale value. Overall, there is a balanced mix of admiration for the car's build quality and technical inquiries, indicating a strong interest coupled with a desire for more transparency regarding its mechanical aspects.
Negative: Several commenters voice concerns about the vehicle, including potential limitations on its usability and questions about its mechanical state. @sbmaine points out the rear end vibration issue, suggesting that it could be a significant drawback. Comments regarding the quick ownership transition also suggest skepticism about the reasons for its resale, casting a shadow on its appeal. @catpat8000 highlights communication issues with the seller, raising red flags for potential buyers about the transparency and reliability of information regarding the Falcon's condition.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is receiving a lot of admiration for its design and features. @vwlover77 highlighted the convertible top as one of the coolest designs, comparing it to a GTI, which adds to its appeal to car enthusiasts. The service history of the vehicle is also acknowledged to be impressive, with comments suggesting that it may even surpass the car's looks. @aSingh39, the seller, encourages potential buyers and answers questions promptly, showcasing professionalism and attentiveness. There is a general excitement about the auction and the high potential for bidding.
Neutral: @aSingh39 provides detailed responses to multiple inquiries about the vehicle's condition ,such as the attachment of the front license plate bracket and the status of its original tires. The seller confirms that the convertible hard top seals properly and assures that all systems, including the AC and heated seats, are functioning without issues. There's also mention of a requested photo for clarity on the sun shade, indicating ongoing engagement with interested bidders. @Uby67vw1958 requests a coolant test for assurance, reflecting a typical due diligence from potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's maintenance records and specific functionalities. @Johnsjam08 inquires about the lack of service records for the HVAC system and coolant flush, noting a desire for transparency in the auction process. Additionally, @Tommy88turbo is worried about the seals of the convertible top and the presence of any dents, seeking further confirmation of the car's condition. Overall, while there is enthusiasm surrounding the car, certain reservations about its maintenance and detailed records have emerged.
|
 |
Positive: @mjcoolinc expressed admiration for the color of the Vespa, stating it is important to be seen on the road, and remarked on its great shape as a solid model that is reliable. @RoryRichter mentioned that, despite the color not being to his taste, he appreciates the GS160 as a great scooter. @Leica1963 also praised the color, while @professorgearhead highlighted the historic significance of the Vespa GS160 as an iconic mod scooter, noting its practicality due to larger wheels and engine compared to other models.
Neutral: @chausmith1974 (The Seller) shared the backstory of the scooter, informing potential bidders it was originally purchased by her late husband from Italy and mentioning that only the paint is not original. She detailed the scooter's well-maintained condition and provided VIN and engine numbers for authenticity verification. @Gabriel25 assessed the scooter's originality, confirming it retains many original parts that would affect its value, and anticipated discussion about restoration costs, referencing @Jetspeed's inquiry about the potential expense to revert the color to its original white.
Negative: @professorgearhead raised concerns about restoration quality, suggesting that it could be indicative of the potential for a 'vietbodge' restoration if the work was done poorly overseas. @bobearski requested import documents, indicating some skepticism about the scooter's authenticity, while @mjcoolinc and @AbnMike discussed the high costs of restoration, implying that the current bidding might not reflect the Vespa's true value. @ScoobyDubious referenced a historical inaccuracy from @professorgearhead regarding Mod culture, leading to potential doubts about the accuracy of claims made about the scooter's heritage.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the car's engine and condition, noting that the straight six engine is reliable. @socalmugu highlighted the engine's reliability and urged the listing to be corrected to reflect the accurate specifications. Additionally, @Pml2222 praised the car's color combination and two-seater design, while @Turbo-Z shared their positive experience with a similar model, emphasizing its power and the joy of driving. @Boatymcboatface described the car as undervalued, indicating a favorable perception within the community.
Neutral: Some comments focused on seeking clarification and additional information regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, with @Oldisgoodtoo inquiring about prior service records. @jgivoo raised questions about specific vehicle components and noted potential issues like a cracked spoiler and the age of the tires, showing that prospective buyers are cautious and interested in thorough details. @Gunsmoke1945, as the seller, addressed these inquiries by confirming regular maintenance and the condition of various parts, contributing to an open dialogue.
Negative: Despite the positive sentiments, there were concerns about misrepresented information in the listing. @itsajaaaaaag and @alexandariliya pointed out the erroneous V12 classification and the need for more detailed explanations to maintain credibility. @jgivoo expressed discomfort over the owner's misclassification of the engine type, while @shaffdshark raised questions about potential paint work, indicating doubts about the vehicle's finish. @Gunsmoke1945 attempted to clarify and reassure bidders by confirming that no paint modifications had occurred.
|
 |
Positive: @2472eogs expressed admiration for the car's aesthetics, calling it great looking and commending its colors. @lincolnsandcaddies conveyed a heartfelt wish to own such a vehicle again, considering it beautiful and wishing the seller, @philstalling, the best with the sale. Another comment from @RJAPPRAISE remarked on the car's gorgeousness, highlighting its decadent appeal and overall attractiveness. @taylor11684 appreciated the size and presence of the vehicle during a recent visit, reinforcing its impressive stature.
Neutral: @philstalling (The Seller) clarified several questions regarding the car's condition, asserting that there is no sign of rust or leaking sunroof, though he acknowledged the car had undergone a repaint at some point. @TheAustrian and @Panther1000 discussed the implications of the missing original pinstriping, suggesting that it indicates the car had been repainted, while also requesting further images to investigate potential damage. Questions from @WW711 about possible water stains and the overall condition were noted by the seller, who committed to checking and clarifying any uncertainties about the back seat armrest and other interior aspects.
Negative: Conversely, some comments reflected a sense of dissatisfaction, such as @WW711's concerns over the seller's communication and the bidding process, indicating a loss of interest due to a sharp price increase. @taylor11684 expressed hesitancy to bid further, driven by apprehensions about what might lie beneath the paint and potential bondo usage, showing a cautious approach toward the vehicle's true condition. @faredce also noted that the seller's communication could be improved, hinting at overall frustrations shared by interested buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @randal55 (The Seller) expresses satisfaction with the truck, noting it is fun to drive, mechanically sound, and has a solid investment with high-quality builds completed. @jeffward25 praises the vehicle's cleanliness and potential for value increase, highlighting that such models are no longer made with the same quality. @randal55 emphasizes that the investment and restoration efforts put into the truck will make it a great vehicle for the new owner. He also shows appreciation for bidders and fans of the model.
Neutral: @Boatbum inquires about the condition of the windows, requesting more details to understand any damage present. @gfritzg asks for clarification regarding a rattle in the vehicle, as well as information about previous accidents and repainting history. @Ivnbill3 checks on the condition of the original drive shafts and the status of a missing mirror, while @Ceilingdemo seeks confirmation about the functionality of the back seat folding down.
Negative: @Boatbum raises concerns about the inconsistencies in paint and the ambiguity regarding window damage, needing further clarification from the seller. @CORVAIRICH is confused about the wheels and expresses a desire for specific eight-hole wheels, indicating a potential disappointment in the listing details. @Beans_Bacon shares a humorous yet frustrating situation regarding their partner's opinion on buying a vehicle, reflecting common challenges faced by enthusiasts.
|
 |
Positive: @Stinger17 (The Seller) emphasizes the rarity and excellent maintenance of the 2009 Bentley Arnage Final Series, highlighting its impressive low mileage of less than 28,000 miles. They describe the car as a 'real time capsule,' meticulously taken care of by the previous owner, with all service records available. The seller promotes the interior and exterior as being in excellent original condition, mentioning unique features such as a retractable 'Flying B' mascot and a high-end audio system. Buyers have responded positively to the car's beauty and rarity, with comments from users like @Niteroi noting its status as a coveted model, referring to it as the "holy grail of Arnages." Overall, commenters appreciate the uniqueness and luxury features of the vehicle.
Neutral: Some questions and comments raised by potential buyers indicate a focus on the vehicle's condition and specific features. @pat.bmw inquires about the navigation system and tire warning light observed during a driving video, while other users like @FinsUp61Imperial are curious about the missing rear window switches and their implications for the car's maintenance. @Stinger17 (The Seller) addresses these inquiries, clarifying that the car drives well and the navigation system is functional, although the switches for the rear windows were not installed due to broken plastic components. Potential buyers express a desire for further visual evidence of the car's condition, with users like @jel36091 and @mibenthal asking for more photos of specific areas to ensure the car's integrity before considering a purchase.
Negative: However, not all comments are entirely favorable. @WisdomFirst raises a concern about the noise level experienced during the driving video, suggesting it doesn’t reflect the expected quiet interior of a Bentley. @2doors questions the quality of the wood finish, mentioning it might be a seam instead of a natural vein, although @Stinger17 (The Seller) insists the wood is in great shape with no cracks. Additionally, @Niteroi points out potential issues with electronics typical of British cars, sharing personal frustrations with persistent warning lights, which may cause hesitation among buyers regarding the mechanical reliability of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Chapter2 describes the vehicle as a very cool 66 with vintage qualities. @ScottyBitchin agrees, noting the serious original aspects of the vehicle and praising the 170 engines as remarkable for their durability. @OFritz3 appreciates the truck's features, citing the I-6 engine and column shifter as part of its charm, reflecting on the simplicity of these earlier models, which adds to their appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @Essco1503, welcomes all to the auction and shares in-depth knowledge of the truck's history, although he acknowledges limitations due to the vehicle's age. He mentions that while the hubcaps are not original to the 66 model, he had to replace them due to availability issues, expressing that many original parts are impossible to find. Additionally, he assures that the truck is in good mechanical condition and can be used as a daily driver.
Negative: @okbob challenges the seller's claims regarding the vehicle's unique features and raises doubts about the reliability of the fire story that supposedly hindered Ford's record-keeping. @Tommy2Tone raises concerns about potential damage to the frame and asks for the vehicle's accident history, while @Diesel771 requests more details about rust condition. @Essco1503 addresses some concerns but emphasizes that the truck is fundamentally a survivor vehicle, clarifying it isn’t a perfect restoration or a high-value collector item.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 expressed optimism about the vehicle, stating that there is a lot to love and an opportunity to restore it to its full potential. @badali also recognized the car's good condition and suggested just getting it running and cleaned up. Overall, many commenters noted the vehicle's classic appeal and uniqueness, indicating that with effort, it could be a rewarding project.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @speedform and @thegtcman, have raised important questions regarding the mechanical condition of the car and its history, indicating a need for more information. The Seller, represented by @editbot, provided clarifications about the car's storage history and availability for inspection, showing willingness to engage with potential buyers. There are also discussions about the car's aesthetics, including a request for more photos, particularly of the interior and undercarriage.
Negative: @thegtcman and @fineboy highlighted various concerns about the vehicle's condition, mentioning potential costly repairs and mechanical uncertainties. @fineboy specifically warned about the risks associated with not draining fluids during long-term storage, which could lead to further damage. There are indications that the vehicle may require significant investment to make it roadworthy again, suggesting challenges for any prospective buyer.
|
 |
Positive: Comments praise the truck's overall appeal, with @mtr25 expressing that they prefer the modified front end and calling it a 'cool truck'. @FirstClassExotics (The Seller) also noted that the vehicle is solid and represented as the 'last of its kind'. The positive tone suggests an enthusiasm for the truck despite some questions about its originality.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Vortec8100, raised inquiries about the truck's modifications and its components, indicating an interest in its specifications. They noted inconsistencies such as the wrong transfer case and different dash trim, suggesting that while the truck might be appealing, potential bidders should be clear on its build history. @FirstClassExotics (The Seller) responded to clarify the refurbishment under the previous owner.
Negative: Skepticism arose from some comments, particularly from @JJPmustang questioning if the truck had been wrecked due to the incorrect front end for an 80. @willy echoed concerns about the potential accident history and the multitude of modifications. These comments indicate a cloud of doubt regarding the truck's condition and history, suggesting that further clarification from the seller could help alleviate concerns.
|
 |
Positive: @NoWildLand commented on the vehicle's beauty, expressing an eagerness to honor it with a bid. @Powerandart also shared positive sentiments, implying that the vehicle sparks thoughtful reflections. Overall, there is a sense of appreciation and admiration for the vehicle's presence within the comments.
Neutral: @eurosepu requested that the seller provide the usual set of videos related to the vehicle, indicating that additional information about it would be helpful. @choicedealsnc2017 (The Seller) confirmed that the videos would be provided, showing responsiveness to inquiries. Additionally, the seller communicated about the installation of a new AGM Diehard battery, highlighting maintenance efforts.
Negative: @NaijaNinja raised a concern by asking about any significant issues the vehicle might have experienced. However, @choicedealsnc2017 (The Seller) addressed the concern directly, stating that there have been no issues at all, which provides reassurance but also reflects some initial skepticism from potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @conquestclassiccars (The Seller) enthusiastically shares their joy about the modified John Cooper Works Mini Countryman, mentioning it as an exciting project built for off-road adventures. They express confidence in the vehicle's capabilities, highlighting the fun experienced during a recent camping trip. Several commenters, like @SaabSnob and @CBowsk, express admiration for the vehicle, particularly appreciating the hard-shell tent and the overall design that balances adventure with utility.
Neutral: The @conquestclassiccars (The Seller) provides clarification on several inquiries related to the vehicle's specifications, such as ground clearance, the condition of the windshield, and the MPG performance. Commenters ask practical questions about components, including the weight and sturdiness of the tent setup while driving in windy conditions, as well as maintenance records and costs associated with replacing the windshield. These inquiries reflect a common interest in understanding the vehicle's operational capacity and care requirements.
Negative: Some concerns were raised, particularly by @GRNHELL and @70GTO455HO, about the windshield's crack and the responsibility for its replacement. There are also doubts regarding the tire sensor light and the overall state of maintenance records. Commenters express hesitation about the vehicle's readiness for sale due to these issues, which could affect potential buyers' confidence in making a purchase without further assurances.
|
 |
Positive: @ChuckDMSB remarked on the vehicle's beautiful build and wished it was orange, expressing good luck for the auction. @Dennis_Jimenez complimented the well-done modifications, particularly noting the rear monitors for driver safety. @awiesmit echoed the enthusiasm, calling the truck good looking and praising the orange color, while @ozzie305 (The Seller) highlighted the real leather seats and functionality of the TVs for car shows, emphasizing the truck's capability to drive anywhere without issues.
Neutral: @DJW48 raised questions regarding the functionality of the rear-facing displays integrated into the back of the headrests and their relationship to the vehicle's entertainment systems, while also inquiring about the truck's drivability and the required work on the braking and steering systems @jww3 shared a desire for specifics on these issues and the possibility of showing a startup and driving video. Additionally, @jww3 mentioned finally locating the installed bed in the photos available.
Negative: Concerns were voiced by @jww3 who highlighted uncertainty about the truck's drivability, particularly regarding whether it needed to be trailered for long distances. @DJW48 sought clarity about the functionality of the rear displays, suggesting they might not serve any purpose in this Ford truck and questioned whether the braking and steering issues were due to wear or incomplete work, which raised a potential red flag about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the Z06, with @chrisbelote (The Seller) highlighting its incredible features and personal connection to the Z06 lineage. @BOOMBAH7 referred to the vehicle as an amazing buy in the used market, emphasizing its value compared to more expensive exotics. The car's condition is also praised, with @chrisbelote noting it has been garage kept, has not been tracked or seen rain, and has received several maintenance upgrades, such as ceramic coating and custom seat covers.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a balanced view of the Z06's potential sale, indicating the current market dynamics. @TurboRoberto and @theticket suggest that the seller might achieve a better sale price if they waited a few more months due to a soft market, while @Cryobrad54 questions the appeal of a high-performance vehicle without a warranty. @racerns and others express curiosity about the vehicle's registration and warranty implications, offering insights into market conditions and strategies for preserving warranty benefits.
Negative: Concerns about the lack of warranty heavily feature in many comments, with @RicHelm and @2014shelbygt500 expressing reluctance to bid due to this stipulation. @ViperACR brings up the availability of new 2025 models at competitive prices with full warranties, which may deter potential buyers from the used market. Additionally, @1saville raises issues regarding recalls and potential fire risks, suggesting that these factors could negatively impact the sale's success.
|
 |
Positive: @PricklyPearAutoClub expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, comparing it to the familiar appeal of Doublemint Gum. @ChaseClassics, the seller, acknowledged the car's captivating presence, highlighting how it has successfully drawn attention from viewers. @Davin commented on the vehicle's unique color, noting its striking visual change in different lighting, and praised the rarity of the Open Air variant, affirming the quality of the listing.
Neutral: @ChaseClassics provided a detailed overview of the Volkswagen Polo Open Air auction, including shipping details and associated costs for international buyers. The seller ensured potential customers of their available support throughout the auction, from answering questions to coordinating transportation and documentation. @Coatesy2239 inquired about the vehicle's UK registration status and whether necessary customs procedures were handled, to which @ChaseClassics confirmed that the car is being sold on its German registration and offered assistance with the UK registration process.
Negative: @turbojj10 raised a concern regarding the absence of an air conditioning option in the vehicle. However, @ChaseClassics promptly addressed the inquiry by clarifying that the car is indeed equipped with air conditioning. Despite the concern, the overall sentiment around the car remains positive, primarily focusing on its unique attributes and the seller's commitment to customer service.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a lot of praise from commenters for its stunning condition and low mileage. @convertparts highlighted the impressive sound of the car and expressed hope that the new owner enjoys it. @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) enthusiastically described the vehicle, stating it has only been driven 7,000 miles, and emphasized the fantastic ownership history. Commenters like @Pcarsba remarked on its beautiful condition and the likelihood of increased value, while @stevenzukor shared his admiration for the car based on owning a similar example. Additionally, @littlehandegan speculated that this incredibly preserved car could become a sought-after collector's item in the future.
Neutral: A few comments raised questions about the car's maintenance and condition, reflecting common concerns for vehicles with low mileage. @mineralfarmer inquired about how often the car had been driven to assess its overall health, while @damb27 expressed curiosity about the IMS bearing and its specifications. @MilesMore sought confirmation regarding the condition of the bumpers, asking for assurance on the original paint status, reflecting a careful approach from potential buyers. @Bluesky added a request for more outdoor photos to better assess the car's condition.
Negative: Some skepticism emerged among the commenters, particularly around the vehicle's true condition despite the seller's assurances. @MilesMore pointed out potential concerns regarding paint issues visible in pictures, asking for clarification on certain reflections. @Bumpo humorously mentioned he's opted out of test driving to avoid drooling, while others like @yorktom mentioned the dilemma of what to do with such a low-mileage car, suggesting concerns about driving it versus preserving it. @Mineralfarmer also expressed his apprehension about cars that sit too long, hinting at a worry regarding the vehicle's long-term reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors praise the vehicle for its unique features and overall condition. @Eldon expresses enthusiasm about the truck's rarity and its potential as a camper, highlighting the D35's desirable characteristics. @buellwinkle appreciates the truck as a classic ‘Cornbinder,’ while @Davey_Jones notes the inclusion of a heater, suggesting that the previous owners took care of their drivers. Overall, the truck is acknowledged for its beautiful patina, originality, and strong operation, particularly mentioning its excellent dump and scissor bed functionality.
Neutral: The comments from @Jakedean1993, the seller, provide essential details about the truck's condition and functionality. The seller mentions that the vehicle has not been cleaned or detailed, indicating it is a true 'barn find'. There are indications of minimal maintenance to ensure it runs and drives well, although routine services like oil changes have not been completed yet. The seller also addresses inquiries regarding videos of the truck in operation, showing responsiveness to potential buyers' requests.
Negative: Some commenters express skepticism about certain aspects of the vehicle. @ecu741026 requests a cold start video, implying uncertainty about the truck's starting reliability. @pbf777 questions the engine design, suggesting that it may not be the expected 'L-Head' type, which raises concerns about the authenticity or expected performance of the engine. Overall, these comments reflect a cautious perspective on the truck's condition and mechanical authenticity.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters show admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, describing it as a beautiful example of a Camaro. Positive remarks highlight the vehicle's original engine assembly stamp and matching partial VIN, with @ssterry pointing out details that suggest the car could indeed be a stunning representation of the model. @gun mentions the allure of the car, stating it looks gorgeous, and @gt2ski expresses how it's hard not to drool over this model. Additionally, the chambered exhaust feature is noted as a special aspect that adds to its charm, drawing a nostalgic connection to the era of muscle cars.
Neutral: Several users are seeking clarification and further information regarding the vehicle's specifications and authenticity. @mike9000ft inquires about engine details and specifications, while @raivjudge seeks to understand the significance of the M435 code on the trim tag. @dzguy provides insights into discrepancies and suggests that the reproduction window sticker might not be original. There are also discussions on the challenges of confirming whether a Van Nuys-built Camaro is a true Z/28, with many expressing a desire for the seller to provide more documentation to verify the car's claims.
Negative: Concerns regarding the authenticity of the vehicle are prevalent among the commenters. Several users, including @camarolynn and @intimidator04, assert that the engine shows signs of having been restamped, raising doubts about its legitimacy as a Z/28. Others, like @badshifter, criticize the lack of documentation and call into question the misrepresentation of the car since it lacks the original components typically associated with Z/28 models. Moreover, the seller's minimal engagement with inquiries about the car has led to skepticism regarding the integrity of the auction listing, as highlighted by @lunchbocks2002.
|
 |
Positive: @Longmire45 praises the unique 'Sumatra Green' paint, noting its ahead-of-time charm, while @neutronrandy admires the Coupe DeVille's straightness and classic Cadillac reliability, fondly recalling a previous Fleetwood Brougham. @Dollycat3 and @Bordeaux comment on the vehicle's beautiful styling and the unbeatable 472 engine from the good old days, recognizing it as one of the last great Cadillac coupes. Overall, the vehicle evokes nostalgia and admiration from commenters who appreciate its vintage appeal and potential for cruising.
Neutral: @KeepitRunnin472 (The Seller) acknowledges the need for repairs while emphasizing that the vehicle is a reliable fixer-upper that starts without issue, providing a detailed list of items requiring attention, including inoperative A/C and power seat switches. @ChasSidwa expresses curiosity about the car's ability to make a long drive to New York, confirming that the master cylinder is functional. This practicality is echoed by @Jerbo, who suggests that the car is an ideal grand tourer, emphasizing the potential for enjoyable road trips.
Negative: @Magn raises concerns about the vehicle's functionality, questioning if the A/C and windows operate correctly. @ChasSidwa worries about driveability issues stemming from exhaust manifold leaks and lack of heating, while @LucCORP mentions the challenges of getting the vehicle compliant with California emissions standards. Although @KeepitRunnin472 (The Seller) reassures that the cooling system works fine, the need for repairs and updates may deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: There are numerous positive comments highlighting the allure and quality of the CL65 Coupe. @GDogg describes it as a 'great looking' vehicle, while @ddausilio praises it after seeing it in person, stating it 'will not disappoint.' @Uberpower is captivated by its stunning design, considering the car as a potential fourth Mercedes-Benz acquisition. @TheOtherPeterB, who owns a 2008 CL600, emphasizes the luxurious experience these cars provide and prefers the CL over competitors like the Bentley Brooklands and Ferrari 612. @gscharnagl expresses an appreciation for AMG models, noting that while a black-on-black aesthetic isn't their preference, the quilted interiors and driving experience make it appealing.
Neutral: The seller, @skedaddle, offers insight into the dealership's background and commitment to quality and transparency in selling this vehicle. They confirm that the car has undergone ABC service, including an oil change and new tires, and acknowledge the importance of providing updated visuals of the vehicle post-paint correction process. @WisdomFirst and @VKAS inquire about the car's maintenance history and specific details regarding the tires and brakes, showing interest in the car's overall condition and service records. The discussion touches on the nuances of the CL65 and CL63 models, with @QueenElizabeth3 and @WisdomFirst debating their respective merits.
Negative: However, some concerns are raised about the vehicle's condition. @QueenElizabeth3 comments on what seems to be poor paint quality on the hood, questioning whether it has a clear bra, indicating a potential defect. Furthermore, @WisdomFirst points out that there seems to be a lack of servicing on the ignition coils or plugs, raising a question about the vehicle's maintenance. @VKAS mentions the front brakes and rotors possibly needing replacement soon, demonstrating apprehension about the impending upkeep costs. These comments suggest that while the car has many appealing features, potential buyers are cautious about its condition and any additional expenses that may arise.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciate the historical aspect and aesthetic appeal of the truck, noting its interesting stories and original condition. @Sacramennah highlights the intriguing tales these vintage trucks might hold, while @Leesplace compliments the truck's nice appearance. @weim55 points out the inclusion of original wheels and hubcaps, indicating their rarity and condition, further enhancing the truck's value in the eyes of potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments seek clarification on the truck's mechanical status and features. @martinecarguy inquires about the function of the gauges and heating, as well as the issue with the taillights, suggesting a desire for more information. @Richard advises the seller to address buyers' questions and provide a video of the truck in action, indicating an interest in its operational capabilities. In addition, @Stevohd provides historical context regarding the side-mounted spare tire options, while @weim55 shares personal experiences with similar trucks.
Negative: Concerns about the truck's functionality are evident in the discussions. @martinecarguy's questions about the nonworking taillights imply a potential flaw that could affect the truck's usability. @JIMMY suggests that the picture indicates why the taillights are inoperable, hinting at underlying issues. Additionally, @Richard expresses worries about the presentation of the truck, urging the seller not to miss out on potential offers by addressing crucial questions and concerns.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic and quality with statements like @AchilesHPR (The Seller) highlighting its exceptional condition and professional repairs. @SaabEnthusiast called the Aero convertibles "truly amazing vehicles," while @smtguy shared his positive experience owning a similar model, praising the build quality and driving fun. The opening photographs of the car also garnered praise; @Roth517 referred to it as the "coolest opening pic I’ve seen in a while!" and @Pathfinder1806 mentioned it was the reason they clicked on the listing, further reinforcing the car's appeal.
Neutral: A few comments indicated general curiosity about the vehicle's specifications and history. @DeusEquitare noted it was a one-family SAAB after 2018, suggesting a positive ownership history, while @262peter remarked that 2008 marked the last year of true SAAB production, reflecting on its legacy. Others, like @afrwt and @Mx7, inquired about possible mechanical issues and conditions of the parts, indicating a cautious approach from interested buyers, but without negative sentiments, maintaining an inquisitive tone.
Negative: There were comments that raised concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @Bill31 questioned whether the airbag deployed during an incident with a fence, while @afrwt pointed out a potential surface rust issue in a specific photo, signaling apprehension about the car's integrity. @CSGC asked about deeper rust problems on the undercarriage, underscoring a common concern for older vehicles. @AchilesHPR (The Seller) addressed many of these concerns directly, assuring that there were no significant issues, but the inquiries reflect a genuine caution among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciate the vehicle's impressive specifications and overall condition. @AZSkye notes it could be an amazing bargain for track enthusiasts, while @Professsa expresses love for the economical spec and the slick top. @badcad celebrates Cadillac for preserving manual transmissions, and @Techdude99 highlights the ease of entry with the base seats, showing it as a favorable option for older buyers.
Neutral: Several comments seek clarification about specific features and history of the vehicle. @tbork raises questions about multiple catalytic converter replacements and engine reprogramming, which @Sevagmtr (The Seller) addresses by explaining these were mostly maintenance-related under warranty. Additionally, inquiries on the car's adaptive cruise control and undercarriage details show a keen interest in understanding the car's features and condition.
Negative: There are concerns regarding the necessity of some repairs, with particular attention to the catalytic converter replacements which @tbork questions. @Yags warns that the manual transmission likely means no adaptive cruise control, leading to some disappointment for buyers seeking that feature. Nonetheless, the comments generally reflect more curiosity about the vehicle rather than significant negative opinions.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its excellent restoration and nostalgic value. @Blizzard340 points out the bike's status as a 'survivor,' commending the efforts taken to prepare it for sale. @2hecknback praises the high-quality tires, suggesting they surpass those found on many full-sized bikes, while @Jackrobat reminisces about personal experiences with the bike, emphasizing its nostalgic appeal. The efforts of the seller, @westcoastmetric, are acknowledged as meticulous, underlining a commitment to quality.
Neutral: A few comments suggest an interest in seeing the bike in action, particularly @Socaljam, who asks for a ride video and offers humorous comments about contacting the seller's younger self for it. The same commenter also mentions potential selling avenues for the vehicle, referencing a high-profile sale of a 1969 VW Beetle. There is a general inquiry about spare parts or literature that may come with the sale, indicating a desire for added value. @westcoastmetric confirms that he has dealer paperwork available, which will be included in the auction.
Negative: There are no explicitly negative comments regarding the vehicle; however, the inquiries from @Socaljam about included spare parts suggest that some potential buyers might have expectations regarding additional items that may or may not be met. The light-hearted banter about ride videos could imply an uncertainty or joking tone that might reflect a desire for proof of functionality that hasn't yet been delivered.
|
 |
Positive: @motcat praised the vehicle, referring to it as a "very nice J10" and commending the seller for providing detailed pictures that showcase minor flaws in the body and paint. This level of transparency and the well-presented nature of the truck suggests the seller is reliable, and @motcat expressed optimism about the vehicle doing well in the market, wishing the seller good luck with the sale.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's functionality included inquiries from @az45 about how to shift the transfer case, indicating a curiosity about its operational features. @Ephelps12, who is the seller, clarified that the transfer case lever has been replaced with a switch inside the glove box and that to engage 4x4, the front wheels need to be manually locked. @Brentjeep added to the discussion by mentioning factory configurations for the transfer case and the potential modifications made to the truck.
Negative: On the downside, @44magFTW pointed out concerns about the tires, specifically mentioning dry rot and suggesting the truck is running rich, which may indicate mechanical issues. @Ephelps12 acknowledged the presence of cracks in the tires, which could pose potential safety concerns for any buyer. Overall, there are some reservations about condition despite the positive outlook presented by some commenters.
|
 |
Positive: @RockyVolvo89 described the vehicle's aesthetics as a 'totally monochrome black and white brick with black interior' and considered it a pretty sweet combo. Others like @masterqi noted the rarity of the specific GL trim, expressing appreciation for the unique configuration of the vehicle. @lperyer mentioned the extensive service records that confirm the vehicle's custom specifications, further supporting its charm and potential value.
Neutral: Comments from @lperyer detailed the car's specifications, including its unique color combination and various options like the driver's side airbag mentioned in the original delivery documents. @Urbanista agreed with @MSPR about the wheel configurations, suggesting these might have been swapped by a previous owner. Discussions about the vehicle's maintenance and driving experience led to varying opinions, with @MonsterSquadBro expressing curiosity about its viability as a daily driver for a college student.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition by multiple commenters. @DaveWest1 questioned the airbag presence and raised doubts about the steering wheel's authenticity. @Volvo1462 pointed out several issues including a broken turn signal and a filthy engine bay. Furthermore, @masterqi advised taking care of a torn preheater hose, indicating possible maintenance challenges for prospective buyers. @lperyer admitted to spending substantial amounts on repairs, suggesting that while the car is solid, it does require ongoing upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: @smoothoperator713 (The Seller) expresses a strong appreciation for the vehicle, recalling how it ignited their passion for cars back in 2006 during a test drive at BMW of San Diego. They describe the experience as amazing, highlighting the vehicle's lasting impact on their car enthusiasm. Furthermore, @TomSgarlata compliments the car with a simple 'nice one', indicating a positive perception of the vehicle.
Neutral: @Tsw23 acknowledges the maintenance of the car, specifically inquiring about the rod bearings, which are known to be a common issue for this model. This comment suggests that the inquirer is knowledgeable about the car's potential problems and interested in the preventative measures taken by the seller. @smoothoperator713 (The Seller) responds, affirming that the rod bearings were replaced twice for assurance, listing numerous other maintenance works that demonstrate the car was well-cared for throughout its ownership.
Negative: There are no negative comments present regarding the vehicle in this discussion. All feedback leans toward either positive experiences or neutral inquiries regarding the car's condition and maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous comments express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and design choices. @johnnyvett appreciates the unique execution, likening it to a C3 Grand Sport, while @C3Lee praises the color combination and the harmony of the seats with the interior. @Chefgordiemac and @Atomic11 both affirm the car's visual appeal and execution, with Chefgordiemac also emphasizing nice work and wishing the seller good luck with the sale. Commenters like @jhoulihan specifically highlight the unique color combination, suggesting it stands out favorably.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about specific details concerning the vehicle's condition and features. @KarKenKens raises questions about potential issues with leaks or noise, expressing a desire for transparency regarding the condition of the car. @Buster020065 asks for additional details about the paint condition and any damage, while @tlbidbat1 requests longer driving video footage. The seller, @Magrajolli, responds to these inquiries, assuring them that the car is in excellent working order and promising to upload more information and photos.
Negative: Some comments bring attention to potential issues that could affect the vehicle's desirability. @C3Lee notes an incorrect trim plate decode, hinting at possible discrepancies in restoration, while @K9dude critiques the interior color choice as mismatched. Concerns about the absence of the air conditioning compressor are raised by @Galah, and @Atomic11 and @Buster020065 both question the quality and condition of the paint, requesting close-up images to assess any bubbling or blistering. These negative points highlight the necessity for further transparency regarding the vehicle's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: @JBplays complimented the Jeep, noting, "Nice Jeep! Whoever restored it did a nice job," highlighting the quality of the restoration. @razorbc expressed pride in having built the Jeep and found it to be a fun project. The seller, CARSFORTOYS, emphasized the Jeep's exceptional restoration, craftsmanship, and original character, making it a standout collector-grade vehicle. They provided detailed information about the Jeep's mechanics, driving experience, and the care taken during its restoration process, assuring buyers of its quality and reliability. CARSFORTOYS also communicated the simplicity and ease of the buying process, emphasizing that they facilitate a seamless experience for U.S. buyers with no additional taxes or duties due to its American manufacture.
Neutral: @DD71F100 raised concerns about the maintenance items listed in the documentation and the inclusion of a hardtop, requesting confirmation on the status of these items. The seller addressed these concerns by confirming that the necessary maintenance had been completed and provided information about the hardtop, stating that a black hardtop is included. @Islander13111 inquired about the extent of the restoration and mentioned their own experience with classic Jeeps. CARSFORTOYS responded positively to the inquiries, demonstrating engagement with potential buyers and reinforcing the Jeep's appealing features and history.
Negative: @Caltoolidge expressed a personal preference for less lift on the Jeep, indicating their experience with a two-inch body lift on their own vehicle and questioning the cost of adjustments. This comment reflects a potential concern for buyers who may prefer different specifications in terms of vehicle stance and lift. Additionally, @DD71F100's questions about missing documents and the condition of the hardtop suggest apprehensions regarding transparency and completeness in the listing information.
|
4.6L-Powered 1995 Land Rover Defender 90 NAS w/ Matching Trailer
SALDV2281SA962217
Lot 210625
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commentators praised the vehicle for its impressive build quality and features. @RoverNut described it as 'awesome,' while @jperakis, after years of owning NAS trucks, expressed that this vehicle made him salivate. Others, like @BradleyJeepGuy and @WAGONBOYTD, appreciated its overlanding capabilities, with the latter noting the rarity of the configuration for utility purposes. @MrOcho and @Buyrovers also expressed their enthusiasm, citing the significance of the underdrive and gear options that enhance the vehicle's performance and versatility.
Neutral: Several comments focused on inquiries and technical details regarding the vehicle. @SierraCar mentioned a missile system that was a lesser-known option but was curious about its operability and service history. @ElVerde sought clarification on the truck's height compatibility with garages, to which @Digger90 confirmed its fitting with minor adjustments. The comments also included questions about the vehicle's fuel economy and specific installation details, like the location of the air compressor and the solar panel setup, which @Digger90 addressed in detail.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about the vehicle's value and registration status. @Tubman777 pointed out the low auction price with only a day left, suggesting potential issues with the vehicle's appeal. @Scrambler4x4 brought up the challenges of transferring a rebuilt title, highlighting the complex regulatory environment in certain states. @Lborgioli also sought clarification on smog regulations regarding the vehicle's transfer within California, indicating that its rebuilt status could complicate the sale process.
|
 |
Positive: @bforbesut expressed enthusiasm for the van, stating a strong desire for one despite not being able to convince his wife. @Firefatboy highlighted the van's spaciousness, noting it is ideal for families with children and ample cargo space. @bxb remarked positively on the van's performance, suggesting that it feels lively on the road and inquiring about its cruising capabilities.
Neutral: @ssmit878 was curious about the vehicle's service history and requested information on whether it had been smoked in. The seller, @Firefatboy, confirmed that the van has never been smoked in and provided details about the recent replacement of the timing belt and general maintenance. Additional questions were raised about the rear-end accident the van was involved in, with the seller clarifying the damage was minor and only cosmetic.
Negative: @ssmit878 raised concerns about the nature and extent of the damage sustained from a previous accident, questioning the seller multiple times for clarification and pictures. The seller reassured the buyer that the damage was purely cosmetic from a minor rear-end collision and provided documentation to address the buyer's concerns. Overall, some skepticism about the van's condition and maintenance history lingered.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the Ducati 900SS Superlight Mk.1, highlighting its beauty and impressive condition. @Pettyfan43 notes the bike's aesthetic appeal and suggests it is even more delightful to ride than to display. @A_330 reminisces about their own positive experience with a similar model, describing it as incredibly fun and expressing excitement over the bike's rarity. @rwantin and @ronsant sing praises of the motorcycle's performance and distinctive engine sound, emphasizing its visceral nature and rideability. Commenters like @ronsduc share fond memories of their own 900SS bikes, affirming its status as a timeless classic.
Neutral: Several comments provide insights into the bike's condition and specifications without expressing strong opinions. @TH707 inquires about the bike's history and previous ownership, showing interest in its background as part of a collection. @Ducvet makes observations on the mechanical aspects of the motorcycle, such as its starting capability and potential modifications, while asking about the components used. @campari (The Seller) also shares details about the bike, referencing an article promoting its qualities and inviting fellow enthusiasts to the auction.
Negative: While the overall sentiment is positive, there are some concerns mentioned. @Ducvet questions whether certain components, like the mufflers and airbox, have been modified, hinting at the possibility of divergence from original specifications. The concern might indicate some apprehensions regarding the bike's authenticity. Additionally, @Flagphotog brings up the recollection of original two-piece wheels, suggesting they could have been recalled, which could imply a complication in the bike's history. However, these comments do not overshadow the generally favorable reception of the motorcycle.
|
 |
Positive: @EFord3357 (The Seller) provided prompt and helpful responses to inquiries about the vehicle, demonstrating excellent customer service. They confirmed that the tires and rims are in perfect condition with less than 300 miles on them, which was positively acknowledged by @johnq1010. Additionally, @EFord3357 (The Seller) received compliments on the vehicle, such as from @shelbybuff who praised the brand upgrades, expressing a positive impression of the Mustang.
Neutral: The discussion surrounding shipping estimates was constructive, with @EFord3357 (The Seller) actively engaging with potential buyers. They provided a range of shipping quotes based on different locations, which included pricing for @Albeezy and @Haverdogg's inquiries. The seller's methodical approach to gather shipping costs showcased an organized effort to assist interested parties, indicating good communication practices.
Negative: There were no significant negative comments regarding the vehicle or the seller. While inquiries about the condition of the tires were made by @johnq1010, they were adequately addressed by @EFord3357 (The Seller), thus mitigating potential concerns. Overall, the conversation lacked any complaints or dissatisfaction from the participants.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic qualities, particularly regarding its unique and stunning color. @mfontaine2008 highlighted the vehicle's beauty and rarity, describing it as stunning, while @DUGEEEFRESH04 proclaimed their love for the gray mica color, declaring it the best wheel choice for the 100-series. Additionally, @Shomoil and @PunjabiLandCruiser noted the car's impressive appearance and details related to specific elements like the CV boot, showcasing overall satisfaction with the vehicle's look.
Neutral: The seller, @FJ60-9FCZYH, provided clarifications on several inquiries. They informed @Espanolie that any damage reported was minor and cosmetic, with pictures from the purchase date available for comparison. They also addressed @huck's question about the grill guard installation, confirming that there were no extra penetrations through the front grill and that it was attached using factory bolts. Regarding the fuel gauge malfunction discussed by @Benjake512, the seller noted that they suspect the fuel pump sending unit may be failing, prompting them to use another method for gauging fuel levels.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly about gaps noted by @Southsidewaterman between the hood and the fender, which the seller acknowledged was due to the hood being left open in the pictures. Additionally, @PunjabiLandCruiser queried a leak from the front CV boot, prompting the seller to investigate and find a crack in the driver's side boot, which they aimed to document further. These issues indicate that while the vehicle is visually appealing, there are some underlying mechanical concerns that potential buyers might need to consider.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally praised the vehicle, noting that it boasts impressive upgrades and a great aesthetic appeal. @tloder described it as a nice looking GTS with excellent enhancements, while @Speaks911 emphasized how the right upgrades elevate the car to be competitive against GT4 models. The seller, @CPStahler, was commended for investing significantly in the car's specifications and maintenance, creating a dual-purpose vehicle that excels on the track and remains street-legal. @Daltron and @Erics75218 also highlighted the car's proper modifications, with one stating that all enhancements were executed to a high standard, emphasizing the vehicle’s potential for thrilling drives both on the road and the track.
Neutral: Several comments offered a balanced perspective, acknowledging the car's excellent suspension and safety modifications while also questioning its power enhancements. @152hrln pointed out the absence of company upgrades related to horsepower and exhaust, suggesting a focus on weight reduction instead. @Caymanorcarrera recognized it as a capable track car while noting it might be excessive for regular street driving. The seller assured potential buyers that the engine integrity was maintained and that they can choose to make power-related upgrades if desired. There were inquiries about the condition and maintenance history of the car, such as the airbag light issue introduced by the new seat installations, which @CPStahler clarified could be an easy fix for the new owner.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and the implications of its previous cosmetic issues. @Carfan_73 expressed the need for transparency about a past incident reflected in the Carfax report, while @RipperJack and @Erics75218 pointed out what appeared to be imperfections and questioned details about the car's interior. @Erics75218 also sought clarification on possible maintenance needs given the car's tracked history, especially regarding the PDK transmission. While these insights reflected buyer caution, the seller reiterated the vehicle's maintained state, countering that the car is in great condition despite needing a detail.
|
 |
Positive: @DC_MotorWerks (The Seller) expresses great enthusiasm for the Hummer H2, highlighting its uniqueness as one of 200 Ultra Marine Limited Edition units. They draw attention to the vehicle's enhanced performance with the 6.2L V8 engine and 6L80 automatic transmission, framing it as a nostalgic gem for those who grew up in the 2000s. The seller notes the vehicle's ownership history in rust-free states, ensuring it is ready for many miles of enjoyment, although cautioning prospective buyers to be mindful of its fuel consumption.
Neutral: @FIVetteMan raises concerns about the vehicle's exterior condition, mentioning visible paint flaws and a dented nerf bar, and requests close-up photos of these imperfections for a clearer assessment. Additionally, @Jcraigz inquires about potential transmission issues, expressing concerns about the vehicle's vulnerability at high mileage, including any leaks or shifting irregularities. Another concern brought up by @Jcraigz is related to past water leaks and possible interior water damage, asking for clarification on these matters.
Negative: @Jcraigz's inquiries about transmission issues and potential flood damage pose a significant concern about the vehicle's reliability. The uncertainties related to prior water leaks could affect buyers' perceptions, creating doubts about the Hummer's overall condition. While @FLVetteMan's request for photos stems from a desire to understand the vehicle's imperfections, it also suggests that the visible blemishes may detract from the perceived value and quality of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @LarryMeyers (The Seller) describes the vehicle as being in amazing condition, highlighting that it shows no undue wear and tear despite having two minor door dings. Many commenters share a positive appreciation for the car's appearance, with @motroman complimenting its beautiful colors and good condition. @SteveCWilson expresses admiration for the Style 82 wheels, and @Redbaron95 mentions that he loves the US bumpers, suggesting they give the car a more predatory and antique look, enhancing its overall aesthetic appeal. The seller notes that the car has operational windows, a sunroof, and a cold AC, indicating a well-maintained vehicle that garners compliments wherever it goes.
Neutral: Several comments provide neutral observations regarding the vehicle. @motorman suggests that seeing maintenance and repair records could aid potential buyers, while @northNH emphasizes the importance of correct tire sizing, indicating a preference for handling aesthetics. @thevintagehondaguy points out a badge issue, suggesting that the M badges should not be present on an L6 model, prompting a discussion about the car's specifications. @chicosito notes the difference in parts availability between the E24 and E31 models without taking a definitive stance on either car's superiority. @TomSgarlata expresses a hopeful outlook for finding a replacement E31 without elaborating further on his preferences.
Negative: Some comments highlight concerns about the vehicle. @thevintagehondaguy mentions that the 'M' badges may have been incorrectly added, as they are typically not found on an L6 model, which may mislead potential buyers about the car's pedigree. @northNH skeptically critiques the US bumpers, alluding to a popular opinion against their aesthetics compared to Euro bumpers. These discussions create a context where the vehicle's authenticity and modifications are called into question, suggesting potential areas of concern for discerning buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm over the vehicle, with @MT1037 noting that it looks nice and requesting a cold start and driving video. @kubotaorange76 referred to it as a "nice damn truck," while @BaerBronco praised it as a "sweet Ford dentside" and highlighted its great year. @boaboyoz also joined the praise, calling the F-250 a delight and complimenting its red and white build, emphasizing the appeal of no reserve auction conditions and wishing good luck to the winning bidder.
Neutral: Some comments sought clarification regarding the auction details and vehicle specifics. @bringatrailer informed @boaboyoz that the F-250 does have a reserve, which raised questions about where to view this information, as @phlcby59 inquired about the reserve number. In response, @944Armadillo pointed out that the reserve amount isn’t published, clarifying the nature of a reserve auction.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition and the lack of initial video footage. @BCDuff asked the owner to provide insights on the engine's performance, questioning if it needed any work if videos were not available. @YennaM contributed to the conversation, seeking further clarification regarding the vehicle's transfer case, which led to @Keaunna (The Seller) confirming specific details about the highboy configuration and addressing the questions raised.
|
 |
Positive: The comments from @GenauAutoWerks (The Seller) reveal a strong enthusiasm for the 1987 Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet, highlighting its excellent condition and detailed service history. The seller mentions the car's comprehensive log, showcasing the care it has received from its two previous owners. Additionally, the recent maintenance work, including oil, filter, and spark plug changes, further underscores its readiness for a new owner, providing reassurance about its performance and reliability. The emphasis on a successful compression test adds credibility to its mechanical state, indicating it is well-maintained and a delight to drive.
Neutral: There are some inquiries from potential buyers, such as @bearden, who asks about the implications of the engine and transmission not having been rebuilt at 150K miles. This reflects a common concern among car buyers regarding the longevity and potential pitfalls of older vehicles. @bearden also acknowledges the seller's excellent service in shipping components, highlighting a positive interaction but also emphasizing the need for potential future services that a new owner might need to plan for. The engaging communication from the seller appears to foster a supportive environment for interested buyers.
Negative: Comments do not reflect significant negative feedback about the vehicle; however, the concerns raised by @bearden suggest potential apprehensions about the lack of major rebuilds and the associated risks. Although these concerns are typical for prospective buyers considering classic cars, they indicate an underlying caution. The absence of any outspoken critiques or strong negative comments may signal a general optimism toward the vehicle's quality, yet the uncertainty surrounding long-term service requirements remains a point of discussion.
|
Captain America Tribute Chopper by Panzer Motorcycle Works
1P9PC79U6YC332111
Lot 210636
Private Party
 |
Positive: Comments highlight strong nostalgic feelings associated with the vehicle, particularly among those who have a connection to the movie "Easy Rider." @GBRBiLL shares that the film was life-changing for him and recalls a memorable experience with his father when they watched it. @dzguy echoes similar sentiments and recounts his early riding experiences, indicating a shared passion for motorcycles that transcends generations. @YankeeDixie appreciates the bike's ability to evoke memories, thanking the seller for momentarily transporting them back in time, while @Fleche_dOr invites others to reminisce by referencing archived footage of the film.
Neutral: Several comments inquire about the bike's mechanical condition, with users like @MPal and @GLWTA questioning if the vehicle runs and the mileage it has. @Spider_Mike discusses the unique handling characteristics due to the extended front fork design, showing an interest in the bike's performance. @broodie and @LarrySturm contribute to the discussion about steering and handling, pointing out that the bike should perform well despite its modifications. The conversation includes technical aspects and invites further engagement with the seller regarding the bike's operational status.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the vehicle's braking system, as several users express skepticism about the lack of a front brake. @63novass raises a practical question about the functionality of the right-hand brake given the bike's design, while @steuy1 (The Seller) confirms that there is indeed only one rear brake. This aspect raises concerns about safety and usability, particularly when navigating hilly terrain, leading to mixed feelings about the bike's practicality on the road. Additionally, @richardpetty poses a light-hearted comparison with a Ducati, hinting at a broader debate on motorcycle preferences.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their excitement about the vehicle, with @RetiredChief mentioning their past ownership of a similar model and calling it a good car. They noted that the 2001 Chrysler in blue with a blue top and pinstripe is generally recognized as the Mulholland Edition, which led to agreement among other enthusiasts. Additionally, @crownconcepts confirmed the presence of the original owner's manual and both sets of keys, which adds to the vehicle's value.
Neutral: The vehicle's specifications were discussed, particularly regarding its age-related features such as the battery and tire dates. @crownconcepts provided information about the battery being dated 05/23 and tires dated 1616, but noted that no official service records were available. The listing was updated on bringatrailer.com to reflect that the vehicle is indeed considered a Mulholland Edition, indicating an active dialogue about its features.
Negative: Some confusion arose among commenters regarding the authenticity of the vehicle's classification as a Mulholland Edition, with @Paul6200 and @RetiredChief debating the specifics of the model. @crownconcepts had to clarify that while the vehicle might have traits of the Mulholland Edition, VIN verification indicated otherwise. Comments from @Masego and @davethewave911 about additional video content and owner’s manuals reflect a desire for more certainty regarding the vehicle's documentation and presentation.
|
 |
Positive: @vitasshiamg (The Seller) mentions that the G80 has been meticulously cared for, always garage-kept, and features a paint correction with PPF and a 5-year ceramic coating. Several users, including @lovebread, agree on the value of the CAE shifter, highlighting it as a brilliant addition that enhances the driving experience. @RC189 also shares a positive view, claiming that having the same CAE shifter adds real fun to the driving experience. Additionally, @vitasshiamg reassures potential buyers about the shifter, stating it can be reverted to OEM easily, which could be a fun project for DIY enthusiasts.
Neutral: The discussions also cover various modifications and components related to the vehicle. @socal_vc and @Fermobianchi inquire about the OEM shifter and ask for details about other modifications and whether the original exhaust components are still available. @Porsche_Boston asks about the suspension setup on the car, while @Sixtyvalve asks about the OEM springs and grills. The seller provides informative responses, indicating that the car is equipped with KW HAS suspension and clarifying on OEM parts availability.
Negative: However, there are notable concerns regarding the shifter and the vehicle's prior maintenance. @MattE92 warns that not restoring the OEM shifter could result in significant depreciation, as it may affect buyer perception of the car's ownership history. @E86_nerd shares similar reluctance, calling the OEM shifter a massive negative and recommending alternatives for improving its feel. There’s also skepticism about the car's maintenance history, as @Coolman2518 and @vuksanos18 raise questions about engine mounts and other components needing replacement or repair at low mileage, which could concern potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @johnnyvett commented positively about the truck, noting that it is a great vehicle and anticipates it becoming a future collectible due to its limited production compared to the Avalanche. @Shomoil (The Seller) is responsive to inquiries, affirming the truck's originality and its condition, thereby gaining the trust of potential buyers.
Neutral: Several users had inquiries about specific aspects of the truck's design and condition. @Dano77 requested close-up pictures to assess the condition of the plastic sections of the bed, while @PHX993 asked about the non-body color rear portions of the bed, suspecting they might be from an Avalanche. @Shomoil (The Seller) engaged actively with these comments, promising to upload additional pictures and provide clarity on the condition of the vehicle, which indicates a commitment to transparency in communication.
Negative: There were concerns raised regarding the authenticity of the truck's components. @PHX993 strongly suggested that the matte black plastic on the bed was indicative of Avalanche parts rather than original features of the Escalade EXT. The discussion about potential fading and mismatched bodywork seems to raise doubts about the vehicle's true condition, leading to skepticism among some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @DeanWinchester (The Seller) welcomes potential bidders warmly, encouraging them to ask any questions they may have and wishing them luck in the bidding process. He clearly shows a passion for cars, indicating a history of owning and trading vehicles, which suggests that he is knowledgeable and experienced as a seller. Additionally, he mentions that the car has served as his daily driver since March, implying that it is reliable and well-maintained.
Neutral: @Romey1963 questions the reason for selling the vehicle, to which @DeanWinchester (The Seller) responds candidly, stating that the car feels too small for his daily use, but also shares his tendency to rotate through cars often. @ChuckDEM inquires about the age of the tires, potential issues with upholstery or body, and delivery costs, to which @DeanWinchester provides clarifying information about the tires and the condition of the car, emphasizing that there are minimal blemishes and offering a method for calculating shipping costs.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's delivery capabilities, as @CHUCKOUTALUCK indicates uncertainty about whether the car would be suitable for a long drive to Cincinnati. Although @DeanWinchester addresses this by assuring potential buyers of its reliability, the initial apprehension from @CHUCKOUTALUCK reflects a general caution among potential bidders concerning the practicality of driving the vehicle long distances.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, calling it beautiful and stunning. @Breezejammer proclaimed it to be 'BEAUTIFUL!!!!', while @BitontoAutos and @gritsandbourbon shared similar sentiments, highlighting the fantastic build and old-school aesthetics of the engine. @2caddiesandaMach1 praised the car's design and interior, expressing appreciation for its old-school look and detailing, which evoked nostalgia. Additionally, @Dollycat3 noted the beautiful upgrades that maintained the car's original essence, enhancing its appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @32Spitfire, provided detailed information about the vehicle, indicating that it celebrates its 75th anniversary this year and comes equipped with a 455 Olds engine. They addressed questions about the vehicle's restoration and condition, stating that the engine runs strong and that they aimed for transparency in the auction. Some commenters, including @smaconi and @nsxtman, requested additional photos to clarify specifics regarding the car's condition, underscoring the importance of thorough examination before purchase.
Negative: A few commenters raised concerns about the car's modifications and overall safety. @Valiantjim questioned whether the chassis was upgraded to match the new drivetrain, indicating that such factors could affect driving dynamics. Additionally, both @gritsandbourbon and @mike_rockwell asked about the presence of safety features and original components, reflecting a desire for more clarity on the car's specifications. Such inquiries indicate potential buyers' cautiousness regarding modifications and restorations that could impact performance.
|
 |
Positive: The Mitsubishi Minicab is described as an outstanding and reliable car, perfect for filling many roles such as leisure trips or small business tasks, thanks to its versatility. @AbsoluteGarage (The Seller) expresses confidence in the vehicle by stating they would not hesitate to take it on adventures, highlighting its low mileage as a key selling point. Additionally, a smooth and transparent auction experience is emphasized, with support for transportation arranged for the winning bidder.
Neutral: @Dobieman930 asks for clarification regarding the drive type of the vehicle, confirming that the Minicab is indeed a rear-wheel drive model. @AbsoluteGarage (The Seller) confirms this detail and mentions that the choice of RWD contributes to a higher top speed compared to the 4x4 versions. @DanGogh inquires about the air conditioning feature, to which @AbsoluteGarage (The Seller) responds that the model does not have A/C but remains comfortable due to good airflow, even in warm climates.
Negative: There are limitations noted regarding the vehicle, such as the absence of air conditioning, which some potential bidders might find unfavorable, especially in warmer states like Florida. The lack of mention of a 4-wheel drive option could also deter customers who prefer that feature for versatility in different driving conditions. Overall, while the comments reflect a generally positive reception, these factors could present drawbacks for some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @McFood describes the vehicle as "Ideal for a quick run to the munitions depot during the Zombie Apocalypse!" highlighting its utilitarian aspects. @boaboyoz expresses excitement over the build, calling it "all sorts of awesome" and commends the spectacular quality of the work. @HemiBoy63 echoes this sentiment with enthusiasm, saying this is "beyond freaking cool!!" Furthermore, @jalexka and @savagebilt discuss the functionality of the butterfly doors with eagerness, displaying an interest in the vehicle's custom features.
Neutral: @savagebilt (The Seller) provides a detailed overview of the modifications made to the Humvee, including functional updates like a lift pump and starter replacement, as well as aesthetic enhancements like undercarriage lighting. @VolterM offers constructive criticism, suggesting the installation of a transfer case nameplate and cleaning the transmission LEDs, showing a proactive approach to the vehicle’s functionality. The seller addresses several inquiries about the truck, from alignment concerns to potential modifications, assuring the quality and serviceability of the vehicle.
Negative: While the truck has garnered much enthusiasm, there are some concerns raised. @savagebilt admits to a fuel issue that delayed a planned test drive video, indicating possible reliability concerns during the auction process. @SMGAK points out that the front left wheel might not track straight, questioning the vehicle's alignment. Moreover, there’s a mention of the existing tires being old and rough, hinting at a necessity for replacement to ensure a more comfortable ride, which might be alarming for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments indicate that the vehicle has a practical setup with a triple hitch, which seems to be beneficial for towing purposes. @matton7578 mentions that the previous owner, an elderly man, used it to haul a slide-in camper, suggesting that the vehicle has been well-maintained for its intended use and likely well-cared for overall. This implies reliability in towing and possibly a marketable feature for potential buyers.
Neutral: @euromotorsvc raises a question regarding the reason for the triple hitch setup, indicating an interest in understanding its functionality better. The question seeks to clarify whether the setup is associated with an older towing sway control method, reflecting a practical concern for those considering towing arrangements. @matton7578 responds by explaining the specific use case for the hitches, providing context without delving into subjective evaluations of the vehicle.
Negative: There are no negative comments in the provided text regarding the vehicle. However, @euromotorsvc's inquiry could imply a slight concern about the appropriateness of the triple hitch for modern towing applications, suggesting that some potential buyers may need reassurance about its compatibility with current standards.
|
 |
Positive: @jm1995 (The Seller) expresses a positive sentiment about the ’89 Mercedes-Benz 300E, stating that he has loved owning it and is sad to part with it, as the funds from the sale will support his new architecture firm. @96NSXTJVA admires the car's appearance, calling it a "Beauty" and noting the attractive color combination, while wishing he could purchase it. @Luz_do_sol provides a thorough appreciation of the vehicle, highlighting its exceptional condition, service records, and trouble-free engine, calling it a low-mile gem and praising the no-reserve listing.
Neutral: @jm1995 (The Seller) replies to inquiries regarding the vehicle, indicating he is available for local showings and providing details about the car's history related to wiring harnesses. He also notes the creaking noise from the seat springs and road noise as possible sources of the sounds reported by @Mbrevo5, suggesting that the car remains solid overall. He actively engages with comments, offering additional media to showcase the car and answering questions about the vehicle's history accurately.
Negative: @Caymanorcarrera speculates about the prior owner possibly losing keys, hinting at a concern about the vehicle's past after a fender bender. @az86 raises a question regarding the accident report involving the front right side, suggesting that potential buyers might be wary of past damage. This inquiry is significant as it may affect the trustworthiness of the vehicle's condition, though @jm1995 (The Seller) addresses this concern promptly by explaining the situation.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters have praised the vehicle, including @Barryward, who calls it a standout tradesman van. @Mulhollander poetically describes it as beyond words, saying it should have inspired a poet, while @vantagedude amusingly refers to it as an official 'Shagin’ Wagon'. @PepperMRoadster adds a nostalgic touch with references to cultural icons, commenting on its strong vibes and affirming it as a choice van. @robiefarmer and @boaboyoz agree, with both expressing excitement and good wishes for the sale, noting its cool factor and fun design.
Neutral: The seller, @Moviemachines, provided interesting background information about the van's features and history. They pointed out that the vehicle was used in a movie and highlighted its well-maintained interior as virginal and unused. They also mentioned the artistry involved in the exterior design, which took two weeks to paint and was finished with a clear coat for protection. Several users, including @Kidsixpack, asked for additional details about specific features, such as the sunroof and metallic finishes, which the seller addressed in follow-up comments.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the van's practicality or historical significance, with @HairOnFire jokingly asking if it includes bongs and condoms, referencing its party vibe. @Artist70 questioned the potential registration costs related to the van's status in California, implying it may not be feasible for a long-term owner. Additionally, @Spider_Mike humorously reflected on the vehicle's association with teenage dating, suggesting it could evoke unwelcome memories.
|
 |
Positive: @E30fanatic1 praised the vehicle for its exceptional condition, highlighting the impressive upkeep of the undercarriage and the overall aesthetics, noting that it looks brand new. He remarked on the engine's performance, describing it as silky smooth and capable of lasting a long time with proper maintenance. @William_Mo, the seller, provided details on the car's history, confirming that it was purchased from the original owner, who had maintained it well. He also promised additional videos to showcase its functionality.
Neutral: Commenters like @sphen35 and @Ocoanater shared their own experiences with similar cars, expressing admiration for the vehicle while inquiring about details such as ownership history and current market value. @philosophe and @yamag7d8 asked relevant questions about the car's registration status, smog compliance, and potential leaks, to which @William_Mo promptly provided reassuring answers, indicating that the car is still registered in California and passes smog with no leaks.
Negative: There were some concerns raised, particularly by @chandler_vt and @JAW_II, regarding mechanical sounds and issues related to starting the car after a week's inactivity. @chandler_vt pointed out a whining noise, while @JAW_II questioned why the battery needed jumping after such a short period. @William_Mo addressed these comments by clarifying that the sounds were normal for the engine and that the battery issue was due to a detailing oversight, aiming to allay fears about the vehicle's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @jpeck2 describes the Ferrari California as absolutely beautiful and expresses a strong liking for the vehicle, despite mentioning no capacity for owning it at the moment. @Carneed, the seller, highlights the solid performance of the car after driving it for almost a week, noting that it’s one of the last models featuring Ferrari’s naturally aspirated V8 engine, which delivers impressive performance and a rich sound. Moreover, @Carneed reassures potential buyers about the transparency regarding the paintwork and the car's maintenance history, indicating confidence in the vehicle’s condition.
Neutral: @Carneed mentions that the vehicle has spent five years with a single owner adding around 3,000 miles while being regularly maintained at Lake Barrington MotorSports. The seller provides detailed information about the past minor accident and its impact on the paintwork, including paint meter readings for verification purposes. They also address the common sticky button issue noted by @DW3D56, indicating that it is primarily affecting specific buttons and that efforts will be made to improve this aspect before the sale.
Negative: @Jcwiza raises concerns about the evidence of paintwork on the car, asking for specifics and photos to substantiate the claims, which suggests a level of skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @Twells10 inquires about the transmission's status and any underlying issues but does not receive any alarming responses from @Carneed, who attempts to reassure by confirming that the transmission is original and functioning smoothly with no leaks or body alignment issues observed. The exchange indicates that potential buyers may have lingering doubts about certain aspects of the vehicle's history.
|
 |
Positive: Multiple commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its rarity and quality. @michaelmotorcar, the seller, emphasized the vehicle's excellent condition and low mileage, stating it is an 'ultimate model' that checks all boxes. @RTH5555, a proud owner of a similar truck, praised it as a beauty that justifies a premium price. @Chrisroma remarked on the impressive condition of the undercarriage, noting it looked cleaner than many FJ Cruisers with significantly more mileage. @CRUSH mentioned that the truck looks just as good as when it was sold, reinforcing its appeal as a born classic.
Neutral: The comments also included informative insights about the Toyota FJ Cruiser. @57vettefuelie questioned whether all Heritage editions came in the same color, while @RTH5555 clarified the color distinctions among the Trail Team Ultimate Editions, detailing how color changes were year-dependent. @s2kroma pointed out that Toyota should pay attention to consumer preferences, positioning the FJ Cruiser as an example of a well-regarded model.
Negative: On the downside, some comments were less enthusiastic. @JB1971SX's comment was flagged as non-constructive, indicating it may not have added value to the discussion. @edscottdds highlighted a potential drawback of the vehicle's layout, mentioning that accessing the back seat requires opening both doors, which could be seen as a design inconvenience.
|
 |
Positive: @largerancher8 praised the vehicle's beauty, expressing interest in the cost of a manual swap. @hunterlablover (The Seller) acknowledged the compliment and shared a heartfelt note about the car's history, having been well-maintained since it was brought home new by her grandmother. Additionally, @hunterlablover also mentioned the successful installation of the sunroof and provided updates about the vehicle's performance and features, including driving videos and the condition of the tires, which have seen little use since installation.
Neutral: @SLCPunk asked the Seller for more details regarding the interior upholstery, speculating that it might have been due to sun damage. @hunterlablover (The Seller) confirmed the presence of sun damage on the seats and staining on the headliner that prompted reupholstery. They also responded to inquiries about the sunroof, sharing a video demonstration and indicating they would look for tire date codes upon returning home.
Negative: @Mgh20180 pointed out that a local shop offers manual swaps for around $3500 but noted that it might be cheaper for someone who can do the work themselves. @Rudi2 commented on the age of the tires, suggesting that the 11-year-old tires should be the first thing to be replaced, indicating a concern about safety. @classiccarbuff inquired about the replacement of the headlight units, questioning whether the original units were retained.
|
 |
Positive: @mb10190 praised the vehicle, describing it as 'very nice' and 'show quality', appreciating the details under the hood. @Wheels77 responded to @mb10190 with gratitude for the compliment. Additionally, @Wheels77 shared interesting production number information, highlighting the rarity of the GT500 coupes from 2007, which adds to the appeal of the vehicle.
Neutral: @Larryg119 inquired about the impact of Hotckis lowering springs on ride and handling, to which @Wheels77 assured that it improves both aspects, making the car ride and handle superbly. @FastFords13 asked whether the vehicle is smoke-free, and @Wheels77 confirmed it is. @Milkbonek9 questioned whether the car would pass California emissions test, receiving information that it has passed Texas emissions tests without issues, although @SOK2 noted California's stricter standards could pose challenges during visual inspection.
Negative: @TXSlammer asked if any of the original take-off parts were available, with @Wheels77 responding that all modifications were completed by a previous owner, indicating that none of the original parts are available. @SOK2 expressed concern about the vehicle's ability to pass California's strict SMOG regulations, implying potential trouble with compliance, especially during visual inspections.
|
 |
Positive: @FordManPDQ (The Seller) mentioned that the car runs well and shifts smoothly, expressing confidence in its performance. The seller also indicated plans to post several videos showcasing the vehicle, which may help potential buyers gauge its condition and functionality. Additionally, @FordManPDQ (The Seller) acknowledged a correction regarding the car's type, appreciating the input from others on the clarification between 'Cabriolet' and 'Convertible Coupe'.
Neutral: Comments from @waburchill1 highlighted how Chevrolet classified this model as a 'Cabriolet' in 1931, further noting that Oldsmobile used distinct terms for similar designs. @ABaron requested a driving video to better understand the vehicle's operation, while also suggesting technical improvements to the carburetor linkage to enhance performance. Overall, there’s a general interest in the details of the vehicle's condition and operation from various commenters.
Negative: Some viewers, such as @neilpierson25, pointed out frustrations with the vehicle’s misclassification, suggesting a humorous bumper sticker indicating that it is not a Model A. @ABaron also expressed concerns regarding the accelerator pump's angle, indicating it could lead to poor acceleration, which might necessitate mechanical attention. The potential need for repairs and adjustments seems to raise caution among some commenters regarding the vehicle's immediate usability.
|
 |
Positive: @DEAUTOSINC provided a clear explanation regarding the vehicle's engine specifications, noting the transition from a V8 to a V6 engine for the 2015 Mercedes-Benz GL450. This response highlights the vehicle's improved fuel efficiency while maintaining the same horsepower, which is a positive selling point for potential buyers.
Neutral: @Mizo1 raised a question about a possible misprint regarding the vehicle's engine type, indicating some confusion but ultimately seeking clarification. @jeddb also expressed interest in seeing a driving video, suggesting that visual content could enhance understanding and interest in the vehicle, although no commitment was made to provide such a video.
Negative: There are no explicitly negative comments regarding the vehicle itself; however, @Mizo1's inquiry about the misprint implies a lack of clarity in the listing that could potentially deter some buyers who may be looking for definitive facts.
|
 |
Positive: @ProvaMo described the vehicle as 'Menacing' with its black on black color scheme, indicating it has an appealing aesthetic. @WCDM, the seller, provided assurances regarding the car’s condition and highlighted its previous registration in the U.S., allowing for a smooth re-importation process without duties or tariffs. The engagement from others about the features of the car, such as @johnnyb11 appreciating the wheels and their design, adds to a positive reception toward the vehicle's styling and desirability.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @vwalfa4re and @johnnyb11, discussed details about the model year and potential issues with the speedometer, presenting a mix of factual observations without strong emotional undertones. @Survivor_1 offered general advice on logistics regarding importing the vehicle, acknowledging the complexities involved but ultimately affirming that the process can be accomplished. @WCDM was responsive to inquiries, indicating an open line of communication and a willingness to provide additional details about the vehicle.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the accuracy of the vehicle's mileage, with @johnnyb11 and @concours pointing out potential discrepancies based on how it was titled in Colorado. @Mackenz's comment was flagged as non-constructive, which reflects that not all discussions were positive and could indicate skepticism among certain users. Additionally, @johnnyb11 expressed caution regarding the mileage listing, noting it could be a clerical error, which could undermine buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @KatManDew expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's condition, noting it is impressively clean given its mileage and appears well-maintained. They also highlighted the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle, particularly mentioning the intact nets on the back of the front seats and the appealing stance paired with nice wheels.
Neutral: @dgbaby commented in a lighthearted way, suggesting that @sexycarchik13 might be interested in the vehicle while @350ZeeYaL8r inquired whether the lowered suspension is adjustable. @kmagnuson (The Seller) clarified that the lowering kit is fixed and not adjustable, indicating a straightforward approach to the suspension setup of the vehicle.
Negative: There were no notably negative comments regarding the vehicle, as the inquiries and responses focused on its features and condition without any expressed concerns or dissatisfaction.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters are excited about the 1966 Chevrolet Corvette Coupe 427 4-Speed Project, highlighting its potential and unique features. @SeekaC2U praised the genuine American Racing Torq Thrust II wheels as the best looking after-market option. @Gmmuscleusa expressed enthusiasm about the body modifications, including the duck tail spoiler and sleek headlight designs. Commenters like @Walt7860 and @GBRBiLL expressed optimism that, with some investment, the vehicle could be restored to a great condition, with @GBRBiLL noting that a well-equipped machine shop could easily bring it back to life.
Neutral: Commenters discussed various aspects of the vehicle, with some sharing specific knowledge about the car's engine and history. @Oldcar informed others that the engine was a legitimate 1967 L36 390 HP, and offered a link to a related listing for context. @mudcar pointed out discrepancies regarding the vehicle's original specifications, suggesting it might have been a small block car. @GTAuto (The Seller) engaged in conversation with detail, responding to inquiries and sharing additional photos, emphasizing the auction's progress and their willingness to provide information.
Negative: Concerns arose among some participants regarding the state of the vehicle and its authenticity. @jeffward25 expressed doubts over the project, suggesting it requires extensive work and might be more beneficial to purchase a complete car instead. @pfunky99 pointed out the issues with missing parts like the "spoiler" and original headlights, indicating that restoring those aspects could prove challenging. Commenters like @mudcar and @MrTrim noted the confusion surrounding the vehicle's parts and history, hinting at a disjointed assembly that might complicate its restoration.
|
 |
Positive: @Ukodonnell03 praised the decision to change the paint color, calling it more appropriate than a previous color scheme. @Dollycat3 described the new Opalescent Dark Green as absolutely gorgeous, and many comments echoed this sentiment, with @Highnumbers commending the return to a dignified look compared to previous styles. @Spider_Mike expressed his admiration for the car's description, stating the Series 1 Jaguar XKE in Opalescent Dark Green was absolutely stunning. Others like @Jags_in_the_barn described it as a nice quality driver for local shows, highlighting its potential appeal. @Descanuck noted it must be one of the last 3.8 models, and several comments emphasized the beauty of the color combination.
Neutral: Comments ranged in tone concerning the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the quality of certain features. @403 mentioned the color change was a great idea but noted a poor engine bay paint job. @peberwein raised a question about missing chrome beading and @PathDoc inquired about the car's Heritage Certificate. Multiple commenters, including @ksscali, remarked on the car's beauty without providing strong opinions on its condition or history. @ShelbyinWashington and @Lord_of_Darkness engaged in technical discussions about the numbers matching and the car's parts, suggesting the community is both invested and knowledgeable about the vehicle.
Negative: Several commenters pointed out various flaws and issues with the car. @Rick-Jedi noted possible incomplete painting and a dent, while @75shortfinal criticized the glare in the photographs. Concerns about the incomplete appearance of the trunk and the unusual engine block number were mentioned by @AutoTherapy and @ShelbyinWashington, respectively. @halmar asked for photos of the original transmission and expressed skepticism about some details, highlighting concerns regarding transparency. Overall, while many admired the car's new color, others voiced doubts about its condition and authenticity.
|
 |
Positive: @Caymanorcarrera praised the vehicle as a "beautiful, well-loved old /2" and @Motogrotto expressed admiration for the addition of Buco bags on the bike. @Kingcowie declared the bike and its accessories to be brilliant, while @Bobsbikes acknowledged the unique bling and the affection evident in the machine, wishing the seller good luck. @Kidaster also commented positively on the high handlebars, stating they look fantastic, adding to the overall appeal of the bike.
Neutral: @Mouse51 suggested setting the idle speed faster for better lubrication, reflecting a technical consideration rather than a personal preference. @Rbeemer reminisced about the days of chroming various parts of motorcycles, noting the bike's missing hooded head and tail light rings as part of the 'Chrome Package.' Additionally, @shooker shared their experience with similar handlebars on their own bike, indicating that they found them comfortable and practical.
Negative: The comments did not contain any outright negative feedback about the vehicle, but @Bobsbikes mentioned getting past the bling to see the "very nice and well-loved 60/2," implying that some may initially overlook the bike's craftsmanship due to its ornamentation.
|
 |
Positive: @davidb72 describes the vehicle as "one of the best looking cars of that era," emphasizing its impressive aesthetics. @FalconFlyer praises the complete package, including the tools and trailer setup, calling the car awesome. @clayatexcel, the seller, highlights that the vehicle is well sorted and competitive in vintage racing, making it an attractive option for those interested in both track days and racing.
Neutral: @64wheels notes the uniqueness of this specific Thunderbird, comparing it to a previously listed model, while @Sweetness12 asks about the car's weight and horsepower. @Chicparm expresses interest in the car's current road course setup and requests a video of it in action. @clayatexcel, the seller, responds to these inquiries, providing detailed technical specifications and information about the car's setup and performance characteristics, maintaining transparency about its capabilities.
Negative: @sandros1 humorously warns not to "bring a trailer" in a light-hearted manner. @redaudio questions if the seller might let the car go for $15,000, showing skepticism about the pricing. Some comments signal uncertainty, such as the request for a track day video and the inquiry into whether the car is currently set for road course use, indicating potential concerns about the vehicle's setup.
|
 |
Positive: @GabeJr praises the incredible build quality of the 1949 Dodge Power Wagon, highlighting how it retains the truck's nostalgic feel while featuring modern upgrades. He notes that it drives smoothly and effortlessly at highway speeds with functional air conditioning and sound systems. The fresh engine and transmission, along with rebuilt axles and a sturdy frame, ensure that the modernized truck operates exceptionally well, providing both reliability and the signature vintage experience.
Neutral: Several comments reflect on the auction process and details about the vehicle itself. @cyclemikey admires the build but mentions an odd gap between the cab and bed. @Grimsby, the seller, emphasizes transparency, stating that all vehicle features will be documented and that the truck's mileage is more substantial than indicated. Additionally, @skychief9 inquires about the dimensions of the truck, hoping to ensure it fits in his garage, showcasing practical concerns about ownership.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the truck’s imperfections and auction management. @Wthortho points out potentially missing bolts from the tailgate hinges, which @Grimsby acknowledges and promises to fix before shipping. @Av68, being quite tall, worries about comfort in the cab and is disappointed to learn that the truck may not accommodate his height, indicating practical limitations that prospective buyers should consider. Overall, these issues suggest that while the truck is impressive, thorough checks are necessary for serious buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @nightraveler69 commented positively on the vehicle, describing it as a very nice automobile that looks modern. The fact that it qualifies for 'antique plates' in states with a 25-year bracket is also seen as a positive point, suggesting the vehicle's appeal and interest in classic cars.
Neutral: @drmbailey (The Seller) provided a thorough response to inquiries from potential buyers, addressing questions about rust, paint conditions, and other specifics related to the Jaguar XJR. The seller highlighted that there were small rust spots and bubbling paint but also provided information about past engine replacement under a recall, offering transparency about the vehicle's history. Additional details on the state of the inner fenders and other components were also shared, alongside plans to add more photos for clarity.
Negative: Multiple concerns were raised about the condition of the vehicle, such as a sagging headliner, rust spots, and whether repairs had been made to common rust-prone areas. @Garageman expressed concern about the headliner, while @Alex1985blue enumerated various specific issues about potential rust and parts of the car that appeared damaged. The flat spot on the wheel was identified as part of curb damage, which indicated potential issues affecting performance and aesthetics.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's striking appearance, particularly praising the Montego Blue color. @EdwoodCA described the color as 'unbelievably gorgeous', and @JGraham referred to it as the 'holy grail color combination'. Commenters suggested that the car, being rare with only 828 models made for the North American market, would certainly attract attention at any driving event, with comments suggesting it looks like a 'James Bond car'. Additionally, the positive experiences shared by @wdb about the car's performance, comfort on long drives, and fuel efficiency further reflect its appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters sought more information about the vehicle's features, including @ALBeanTown, who inquired about a button on the console, and @heywatchit, who asked about the car's lighting system. Commenters also recognized the seller's previous listing on Cars & Bids, with @glazkicars noting the auction history and potential pricing comparison with other sales. The seller, @JHALA, provided informative responses to questions and commented on the vehicle's specifications and past experiences with it, aiming to foster engagement with potential bidders.
Negative: There were some concerns and requests for additional details that highlighted potential shortcomings; for example, @SteveSylvester requested thorough underside photos and @heywatchit questioned the absence of adaptive xenons. Furthermore, @JHALA noted logistical complications that prevented him from fulfilling some requests, which may lead to uncertainty for interested buyers. While the seller communicated a sense of regret in parting with the vehicle, the need for space and practicality with a growing family hinted at the constraints associated with owning such a specialized car.
|
 |
Positive: @BlakeBronco exclaimed that the Bronco is awesome and appreciated the vintage 1979 Dojamats. @MontanaBroncos praised the beautiful Dark Jade & Sand color combination and expressed a fondness for rear sliders, mentioning a personal bias towards the state it resides in. @BaerBronco also shared their love for 2nd generation Broncos and noted that this specific model does not disappoint, highlighting its strong motor with D0VE heads. @boaboyoz called the Bronco a magnificent build, describing its Dark Jade Metallic color as magical and wishing the seller good luck with the sale.
Neutral: @Fastboater23 complimented the looks of the Bronco and inquired about the brand of fuel injection added to the vehicle, as well as the details of the motor's rebuild. @CDehne raised questions about whether the factory gear ratios remained unchanged or were adjusted for the larger tires, indicating a desire for further information regarding the vehicle's modifications. @Bigjordan007 asked about the height of the Bronco to determine if it would fit in their garage, showing interest in its dimensions.
Negative: @Skillman21 questioned the grey carpeted box visible in some cargo area pictures, seeking clarification about its purpose. @CDehne's repeated inquiries about the stock gear ratios suggest uncertainty about the vehicle's modifications, indicating a potential concern. Additionally, @Matthew454 (The Seller) acknowledged uncertainty regarding the extent of modifications done by the original owner, which could lead to doubts in potential buyers about the vehicle's consistency with their expectations.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the car, highlighting its impressive condition, beautiful spec, and tasteful upgrades. @Gearhed64 noted the car's condition is particularly notable, and @jtrac praised the seller, alleging that every vehicle he tends to is a great specimen. @milamos shared affection for the interior, while @SchwarzerHund complimented the car's color combination and stylish features, like no rub strips and phone dials. Another commenter, @Salgado911, praised the seller's transparency and accommodating nature during their visit, stating that the 928 deserves to be driven and enjoyed, and emphasized the fantastic sound of the Borla exhaust.
Neutral: Several comments sought further clarification about specific features and the car's history. @matte88 and @egirl inquired about photos of certain areas, with @matte88 particularly interested in the front seat bolsters and @egirl asking for pictures of the back seats in a particular position. @TangerineDream asked about stock exhaust availability and how the car handles, to which the seller clarified that they replaced the original with a Borla exhaust due to its condition. Also, @Poromeo raised questions regarding driving videos and interior conditions, including whether the carpets are original and the status of a brake light on the dash.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about potential issues with the car. @kenshapiro2002 observed what appeared to be poor body repair in the exhaust videos, prompting the seller to clarify that it was likely from a previous mishap rather than recent work. @wurzitup questioned the off-center steering wheel, to which the seller explained it was a simple fix. Additionally, concerns about possible water damage were mentioned, and the seller confirmed its presence but assured that it was not widespread. Overall, while the comments were generally positive, these inquiries pointed to some uncertainties regarding the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @walt1 (The Seller) expresses a fondness for the vehicle, describing it as a "little gem" that will turn heads and bring smiles, noting its nostalgic value stemming from family memories. The seller enjoys driving it, associating it with fun experiences and positive interactions from the community.
Neutral: @Russ points out that the vehicle is equipped with a "Big Block" 300 cc engine, while @isettajohn mentions that it has a one-cylinder Hemi engine. There seems to be curiosity about potential modifications too, as @Fairmont663336 wonders about the possibility of installing a 2-stroke motorcycle engine in it. Additionally, @sgrles inquires about the vehicle's title, showing interest in its ownership and history.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the vehicle's title status; @sgrles poses a question about whether there is a title for the Isetta, indicating that potential buyers may be wary of purchasing a vehicle without clear ownership documentation. Despite the positive memories shared by the seller, the uncertainty surrounding the title may deter some interested parties.
|
 |
Positive: @darthmalaguti describes the vehicle as a "beautiful example" and praises the Staintunes, noting their impressive impact and the special features like the canister filter, plaque, and t-shirt that come with it. @bmccleery appreciates @darthmalaguti's compliment and shares details about the Staintunes being part of a special production run for a select group of owners. This highlights the uniqueness and desirability of the vehicle. @isabelspike adds to the positive discussion by mentioning her own early example of the vehicle and expressing intrigue over the signature changes on the plaques, showcasing the rich history behind it.
Neutral: @bmccleery responds to @bmccleery's question regarding the odometer by explaining that he has yet to figure out how to switch it to mph, humorously stating that he just pretends to ride in Europe. This comment reflects a light-hearted approach to a minor inconvenience, indicating an overall enjoyment of the vehicle despite this quirk. Additionally, @Dfrakes2 requests a video of the vehicle running, which illustrates the interest from potential buyers and the engagement from the community in learning more about its performance.
Negative: There are no negative comments about the vehicle in the provided responses. The questions and observations made are generally constructive, with no criticisms or complaints indicated. The dialogue remains focused on the features, history, and personal anecdotes concerning the vehicle, maintaining a positive and engaged atmosphere among the commenters.
|
 |
Positive: @5KLegacy (The Seller) emphasized the uniqueness of the Express 8′ long bed, noting that it looks great in person and is fairly rare. Multiple comments expressed admiration for the truck's appearance and utility, with @rj58 praising its good looks and @Dexandsqueak mentioning a desire to keep it in Washington. @neilpierson25 described it as a great example of 'good enough,' saying it draws attention and can be enjoyed anywhere, while @5KLegacy (The Seller) agreed and highlighted the truck's impressive performance with the original engine and drivetrain.
Neutral: Overall, there was a mix of questions and observations regarding the vehicle's operational capabilities. @5KLegacy (The Seller) provided insights into the driving experience, mentioning that the truck can cruise comfortably at 55 mph, and offered reassurance to @masmyk1 about its long-distance drivability. Concerns were raised by @hydra and @masmyk1 about the condition of certain components, such as the bench seat and the exhaust's proximity to the shocks, which @5KLegacy (The Seller) addressed with forthcoming details, stating that while the seat condition is not perfect, it is manageable, and no noises were heard from the exhaust during operation.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the truck's condition, particularly regarding the driver's seat, which @5KLegacy (The Seller) noted is sagging and may need replacement soon. @masmyk1 and @TSkinner sought clarity on potential issues such as a support cross member under the transmission and whether the exhaust was hitting the rear shocks. The fact that the seat cover was tied in knots and could not be easily removed seemed to worry potential buyers, although @5KLegacy (The Seller) assured that there was no rattling during operation.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a general admiration for the vehicle, particularly noting its impressive build quality and unique features. @Caymanorcarrera called it a 'VERY nice 986 Outlaw', while @RumbleAuto praised the blend of great taste and restraint in the modifications made. @JJJames, the Seller, highlighted the car's impressive handling and the joy it brings to drive, emphasizing that this particular Boxster S offers a magical driving experience due to it being based on the underrated 986S chassis. Commenters such as @cbadbox and @museguy also shared their excitement for the 3.6L engine swap and the overall enhancements, emphasizing the car's fun and sporty appeal that connects enthusiasts to its raw performance.
Neutral: Several comments offered neutral inquiries and observations about the vehicle's history and specifics. @kfreytag expressed interest in the shift knob and accident repair details, while @trh77 asked about the functionality of the steering wheel airbag and specifics about the seats and bumper covers. @Aymamacita sought information about the engine build and replacement parts, which @JJJames promptly addressed. Commenters discussed the implications of tariffs for US buyers and acknowledged the originality of the car's features, with @revron humorously commenting on the engine source and its unique brand name. Overall, these comments fostered a candid dialogue around the logistical aspects of the sale without any negativity.
Negative: Some negative sentiments revolved around certain aesthetic choices and concerns about the vehicle's modifications. @Usd97 explicitly mentioned that the steering wheel looked out of place, although he acknowledged it was a matter of personal taste. @geoffreyapope questioned the cleanliness of the engine components, suggesting they appeared overly coated, leading to a clarification from @JJJames that it was intentionally sealed to prevent rust. Additionally, @NewUpper expressed skepticism about the authenticity of a cold start video, requesting further proof of the car's condition. These comments indicate that while the vehicle attracted a lot of praise, there were concerns regarding specific modifications and the presentation of the car's condition during the sale discussions.
|
 |
Positive: @WINGNUT1960 highlights the rarity and nostalgic value of the vehicle, recalling the memorable Ricardo Montalban commercial associated with it. The seller emphasizes that the car runs great and drives well, with most features functioning properly aside from the cruise control. The original paint has been meticulously buffed, showing off its charm while preserving its history, and they believe the odometer reading of 10,849 miles to be accurate. Enthusiasts like @EvorICE and @ronsant praise its iconic design and powerful big-block engine, underscoring its status as a desirable cruiser.
Neutral: Comments from users like @dodgefan and @wyckoffmichael inquire about specific details, such as the color and the functionality of the vehicle's Lean-Burn system. @WINGNUT1960 provides informative responses regarding the vehicle's specifications, offering insights into its engineering and past performance. Other users reflect on their experiences with similar models, noting the affection for the vehicle and its vintage appeal, while also making connections to broader Chrysler history and design trends.
Negative: Despite the overall admiration, there are a few criticisms regarding the car. @jagster911 expresses disdain for the repetitive comments about its leather seats, suggesting such remarks overshadow the cars' individuality and history. @wyckoffmichael directly questions the Lean-Burn system, hinting at potential reliability issues. There are also concerns mentioned about the fading on the rear trunk lid stripe and a lack of mechanics familiar with classic cars in the seller's area, which may discourage potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @SWFFerrari430 commented on the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle, indicating it looks great. Another positive note comes from @Michaeltboat, who provided detailed answers to potential buyers, affirming the presence of original manuals in the glove box and a pedal controller, enhancing the vehicle's perceived value. Additional details about the seat dimensions provided by @Michaeltboat further illustrate the care taken in providing complete information to interested bidders, which might attract more attention to the listing.
Neutral: Several users, including @FJ0077 and @pkornel, expressed inquiries about the vehicle's condition, but their comments were devoid of emotional weight. @Michaeltboat addressed these inquiries by confirming the lack of damage, leaks, or issues, establishing an air of transparency that may reassure potential buyers. The basic information provided about the vehicle, such as the number of keys and the additional details like the dimensions of the front seats, reflects a neutral approach to facilitating a potential sale without heightened enthusiasm or negativity.
Negative: @FJ0077 raised concerns about potential issues with the vehicle, asking about glass damage, leaks, frame damage, and previous paintwork, suggesting skepticism about the vehicle’s condition. @SWFFerrari430 also prompted questions regarding service records and the original window sticker, indicating a need for more assurance on the car's history, which might imply that buyers have reservations due to its unfortunate seller's circumstances. Such inquiries could raise concerns among other potential buyers about the overall reliability of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @thrlsk mentioned the vehicle as 'very cool' after seeing it at the shop, while @iamnotcasey described the sound of the engine, comparing it to a mini-F1 car, expressing enthusiasm about the videos showcased. @rlaverty praised the car's fast and light design, noting its incredible performance and the designer's capabilities. Additionally, @M3_Driver found the car impressive for its racing capabilities, especially with a recorded time of 2.11 at Road America, and noted that having a parts supplier indicates the car's reliability and potential for buyers.
Neutral: @Gydyn inquired about the availability of replacement parts from Edge Engineering, to which @keach31 (The Seller) assured that they have all necessary equipment and plans to produce parts indefinitely. @M3_Driver questioned the status of Edge Engineering and received clarification from the seller about the company's existence and their current arrangements with it. @Gydyn later corrected the lap time record mentioned, indicating that the competitive times in F1000 were quicker than originally stated, but he acknowledged the car's speed nonetheless.
Negative: @WyoMatt defended the car's speed against skepticism, indicating that those questioning its velocity might lack understanding. @Clydevan raised a concern about fitting in the vehicle, although @keach31 (The Seller) reassured that even larger drivers would comfortably fit in the cockpit, dispelling worries. Despite @keach31's confidence in the car's performance, there was a humorous admission about personal driving speed, suggesting that while the vehicle is capable, not every driver may extract its full potential.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its quality and performance. @md7md7 mentions that it is a great car and inquires about any issues with the Vanos system, to which @Dave-T (The Seller) assures there are none. Commenters like @BMWE90Guy underscore the desirability of the B58 engine, emphasizing its reputation with accolades such as 'B58 is the engine to have.' Another user, @SupremeDeluxe, shares a positive experience with their similar model, labeling it the best daily driver they've ever owned and mentioning its reliability.
Neutral: Several commenters pose questions to @Dave-T regarding the vehicle's specifications and history. @Alex_bmw asks whether any panels have been repainted, to which @Dave-T responds that the original paint is in excellent condition. Concerns about maintenance practices are raised, with @Alex_bmw probing into service records for transmission fluid changes. @Ro_Go provides insights about the ZF8HP service for the transmission and shares their appreciation for the car's particular aesthetic.
Negative: The negative sentiment primarily revolves around maintenance. @Alex_bmw questions the absence of a suggested transmission service and highlights concerns about BMW's 'lifetime oil' policy for manual transmissions, suggesting it is misleading. @Ro_Go reflects on this issue, indicating that if he were the new owner, he would perform the service immediately to ensure better longevity. While not overtly negative about the car's performance or quality, these concerns raise flags regarding potential overlooked maintenance practices.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the Brubaker Box, highlighting its unique design and retro appeal. @mynameistimo rated it a perfect 10 out of 10 for daily driving, while @G-man described it as 'Too Kool for Skool!!'. Enthusiasts like @Kidsixpack and @boaboyoz find it 'way cool' and 'amazing', showing that the vehicle captures the imagination of various users. @Raffi provided a detailed analysis of its historical significance, describing it as a 'pretty amazing design' that has no genetic connection to prior models, making it stand out in automotive history. Additionally, @Tom_S. praised the Keystone wheels as the icing on the cake, indicating that these aesthetic details enhance the vehicle's overall charm.
Neutral: Several comments reflect on the Brubaker Box's drivetrain and historical context rather than outright praise or criticism. @Evan-Manning found the drivetrain disappointing, while others like @DanChester deem it acceptable for beach trips, indicating that while it may not be top-notch, it suits its original purpose. @RBBGroup humorously commented, 'One-door-fits-all,' which hints at the unconventional design but lacks deeper critique. Discussions around similar vehicles, such as the VW Bus, also reveal an ongoing conversation about its place in automotive history, with users like @2009G8GT noting it as a more functional alternative to dune buggies of the time without altering the Beetle's structure too much.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism regarding the Brubaker Box's practicality and market viability. @Thomasgentle shared concerns about wanting to be behind it on a hill, indicating it might lack power or efficiency. Others, like @ferrous8, criticized the added wooden adornment on the front as undesirable, suggesting a preference for a more streamlined design. @jhalan admitted to never having heard of the Box until now, which hints at its obscurity in mainstream automotive culture. Additionally, @2009G8GT and @Raffi discussed its failure to gain traction in the market, attributing its downfall to the socio-cultural rejections of that era, suggesting that the timing surrounding its debut hampered its success fundamentally.
|
 |
Positive: @VanquishMotorCo expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting it as a cool car and appreciating the details visible up close. @57charlie echoed this sentiment, describing it as a fun-looking car that he loves. @MeanolGoat praised the beauty of the Auburn and inquired about its comfort and seating features, emphasizing its appeal.
Neutral: @patrickenxing (The Seller) provided clarifications about the vehicle's specifications, confirming that the engine and transmission are indeed sourced as new from Speedster Co in Florida, despite the car being preowned for 11 years. The Seller also addressed inquiries regarding the size of the replicas, indicating that most closely match the original length of 195 inches, and that the seat has a comfortable power adjustment, making it suitable for long drives.
Negative: Some comments raised practical concerns. @Papaed78 asked about the history of the engine and transmission, indicating a level of caution regarding used components. @Corwin raised an inquiry about the length of replicas compared to originals, highlighting potential confusion in dimensions. @Barryward's comment, while humorous, suggests a sense of frustration or reluctance regarding current circumstances rather than reflecting positively on the car.
|
20-Years-Owned 1984 Ford F-250 XL SuperCab Centurion Dually Diesel 4×4
1FTHX2610EKA68949
Lot 210681
Private Party
 |
Positive: @OKSnake08 describes the truck as great looking and clearly loved and cared for, especially noting the aesthetics of the supercab dually design. @PBarber12 expresses appreciation for the compliments, sharing their emotional connection to the vehicle and their desire for it to be taken care of by the new owner. The discussions highlight the nostalgia and admiration for the truck's condition and style.
Neutral: @Button inquires about the factory color, at which point @PBarber provides clarification that the truck was repainted. @cplwojtek asks if Centurion was responsible for the dually conversion, to which @PBarber confirms this involvement. There are also inquiries about details such as the axle mark seen in picture 52, with @PBarber explaining that it is related to factory stamping and tagging.
Negative: @rivers1 raises a concern over the mark on the axle, prompting a clarification from @PBarber. @SeanG777 points out a discrepancy between the initial description of the truck as rear-wheel drive and a headline suggesting it is 4x4, leading to an update in the listing by bringatrailer. This indicates potential confusion or oversight regarding the specifications of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Duchesshs described the vehicle as a stunning car, while @FastDraw found it awesome and noted that its aesthetic is appealing despite some potential concerns about the tires' age. @Flashpix reminisced about the car and mentioned that, although the color is bold, it is growing on them, particularly appreciating the interior of the vehicle. @24K expressed regret over a previous buyer flaking out, wishing the current listing good luck, indicating that the car remains in demand.
Neutral: @autocentroimports (The Seller) welcomed everyone back to the listing and expressed openness to questions, mentioning that the last sale wasn't completed and they are still searching for a new owner for the vehicle. @Valvechatter inquired about the condition of the soft top's rear window, leading to a follow-up by @bmw_eddie who also asked about the inquiry. The Seller confirmed that the original top does have a faint haze, which they clarified with additional photos.
Negative: @Jilloma raised concerns regarding potential signs of weakness in the trunk welds and differential mounts and also pointed out what seemed to be stains on the leather in specific photos. The Seller assured @Jilloma that there are no signs of weakness in the trunk or mounts and clarified that the interior appears clean, attributing the yellow tint to reflective lighting.
|
31k-Mile 1994 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra Convertible Pace Car
1FALP45D9RF158610
Lot 210683
Private Party
 |
Positive: @GregDantas (The Seller) describes his passion for buying and selling cars, acknowledging that while he may lose money on some deals, he enjoys the hobby, which allows for a significant return on investment. He emphasizes his willingness to answer any questions and provide photos and videos, showcasing his commitment to customer service. The seller mentions that the vehicle is in 'mint condition' and expresses confidence that it will attract interest, identifying features that make it desirable.
Neutral: @Tacony raises a query about potential issues regarding the window moldings' appearance, indicating he seeks clarification about whether the buildup is wax, compound, or masking from paintwork. @GregDantas (The Seller) responds positively, offering to provide close-up imagery to address Tacony's concerns and clarifying that no paintwork has been done on the vehicle and that it has been fully detailed recently. He reassures prospective buyers by providing images and details relevant to their interest.
Negative: @Pawpawstoy questions the absence of Indy 500 graphics on the car, suggesting a concern about the vehicle's authenticity or completeness. @GregDantas (The Seller) clarifies that many owners of these special edition cars choose not to install the graphics and informs him that the graphics are available in a box in the trunk. Additionally, he notes an important disclosure regarding the auto lock module issue, suggesting a potential inconvenience for future buyers, who may need to replace the component.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its fun nature and the enjoyable driving experience it offers. @DDJ (The Seller) emphasizes the quality and care that has gone into maintaining the Mini, noting features like the OEM rubber floor mats that contribute to the interior being in excellent condition. The seller also mentions that the car comes with additional options like spare wheels and graphics, enhancing its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several questions were raised about the vehicle's features and service history. @T.Mahon inquired about service records, to which @DDJ (The Seller) responded that only routine maintenance had been performed since ownership, ensuring potential buyers that the car runs great with no issues. Additionally, @KMBCars asked about the engine and modifications, receiving confirmation that there are no leaks or modifications, which could assure those interested in the vehicle's original performance.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns regarding specific details about the vehicle. @borton questioned the nature of the aftermarket exhaust, and while @DDJ (The Seller) provided clarity, it indicates a level of scrutiny some buyers may have. @hiddengamer7 pondered potential concerns about driving the vehicle long distances, indicating hesitation that could deter interested buyers who might be worried about reliability or logistics.
|
 |
Positive: @firatakcay describes the vehicle as a "tank!", emphasizing its robust nature. @Jline78 appreciates the car's low mileage and the classic silver AMG appeal, indicating it as one of the best collectibles. Similarly, @HDWalt shares positive experiences, having owned two of these models, complimenting the vehicle's performance and affordability in the current market.
Neutral: @Malama raises a concern regarding potential color mismatches between the front quarter panel and the driver’s door, inquiring whether this is due to repainting or lighting effects. @EuroCarsFan asks about the headliner sagging in the rear, and @Yeezers seeks clarification on whether the car has new shocks installed, while mentioning that it has been lowered. Seller @briankyu provides responses to these inquiries, confirming the repainting of certain areas and the condition of the headliner.
Negative: @royclausen expresses skepticism about the driver's side paint job, implying it was not blended well and appears off. @brianpergament comments on the vehicle's past service and condition, initially curious about a warning message, which he later finds to be explained satisfactorily by @briankyu. Overall, while the car has an impressive history and care, these comments reflect concerns about the quality of the repaint and care continuity.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reveal positive aspects of the vehicle, particularly regarding its comfort features. @dhonthehill expresses admiration for the double armrest seats, highlighting their appeal. @Sherrybabe (The Seller) confirms these seats were already in the vehicle when purchased, indicating a well-appointed interior and potentially luxurious touches.
Neutral: There is a neutral exchange concerning the vehicle's paint and transmission. @Automark inquires about the factory paint history and transmission type, to which @Sherrybabe clarifies that the factory paint was solid red and confirms that it has an automatic transmission. This information seems to be straightforward and factual, without emotive language or strong opinions.
Negative: While there are no overtly negative comments about the vehicle, there are hints of confusion and the need for clarification. @Automark’s initial message points out a potential error regarding the transmission type, and there is a subtle impression that the original paint query may suggest concerns about the authenticity of the vehicle's overall appearance and history.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is presented by @RPFMotorcars as a low mileage 987 Boxster S auction, highlighting its unique color combination that garners compliments and distinctive wheels that enhance its appeal. Commentor @ibmiked praises the sumptuous full leather interior, suggesting it brings an overall luxurious feel to the vehicle. @RPFMotorcars appreciates the love for the interior color, especially as it extends to the soft top, and engages effectively with potential buyers by offering detailed photos and availability for viewing the car in person.
Neutral: Several inquiries seek clarification on specific details, including service records and whether potential bidders could view the car physically. @jrsebringjr asks about the availability of service records, which @RPFMotorcars readily provides, affirming that Carfax indicates the car has been well maintained. Commentor @GordonN raises a concern regarding the IMS bearing service history, and @Michaewh requests the Porsche DME report, which @RPFMotorcars supplies promptly, reflecting a commitment to transparency.
Negative: Some comments hint at concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, including @sphipps asking for detailed photos of dents and scratches, suggesting a lack of clarity about these minor imperfections. @GordonN expresses doubt about the IMS bearing replacement based on the Carfax records, which doesn't list it as completed. Additionally, @Michaewh notes a 9-year service lapse after an oil change, raising questions about the overall maintenance during that period, although @EarlOfCottingham reassures that such a lapse shouldn't be a considerable concern.
|
 |
Positive: The 2013 Ural has received enthusiastic feedback from several commenters, praising its reliability and fun factor. @HHRider, who has experience with the model, shared how he put approximately 20,000 miles on his without major issues, highlighting that maintenance is key to its dependability. The unique features of the this Ural, such as the installed machine gun mount, add to its desirability and charm, making it a standout choice for enthusiasts. @pdc1524 appreciated the picturesque photos which invoke nostalgic imagery, comparing it to scenes from classic films like The Great Escape. The seller, @hydraautomotive, has also emphasized the vehicle's powerful starting capabilities and comfort during rides, further adding to the allure of prospective buyers.
Neutral: Commenters have engaged in discussions about the Ural's unique attributes and usability. @Bartleby8 inquired about a comfortable cruising speed and was pleasantly surprised to hear that 60 mph was achievable. A conversation about the machine gun mounts led to tips on where to find them, indicating a community eager to share knowledge and resources. @MillyG provided a clarifying note regarding the vehicle's mileage, marking it at 6500 kilometers rather than miles, which the seller acknowledged. The community's backing suggests a supportive network of Ural riders who provide useful insights and assistance during the selling process.
Negative: Despite overall positive feedback, there are some concerns regarding the Ural’s speedometer, which is currently not functioning according to the seller. @NickW1 expressed curiosity about the potential for it to be replaced, indicating that some buyers may desire complete functionality. Moreover, @Tvilleguy raised questions about the service history and whether any recalls were addressed, pointing to a reasonable expectation for transparency in the vehicle's maintenance background. The seller has mentioned that services were conducted by the previous owner but did not provide comprehensive documentation, which could deter some potential buyers seeking more detailed assurance.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the overall aesthetics and condition of the 1992 Cadillac Sedan DeVille, calling it beautiful, exceptional, and well cared for. @lincolnsandcaddies expressed admiration for its gorgeous appearance, while @GDogg acknowledged its good looks and wished everyone the best with the auction. @HughCasiano noted that the car seemed like it had been in a time capsule, emphasizing its preserved state and appeal. The seller @59caddyman highlighted the car's low mileage and extensive servicing, which further enhances its value in the eyes of potential bidders.
Neutral: Some comments reflect curiosity regarding the vehicle's history and condition. @PghMusicMan asked about the car's past, while @Miamistp inquired about the headliner and the functionality of the trunk pull-down feature. Others, like @Ezedozitt21 and @6928kingsbury, requested clarification about specific repairs, tire conditions, and details related to emissions tests. Overall, these comments reveal that while the car seems to be in excellent condition, potential buyers seek more detailed information to ease their concerns.
Negative: Concerns were raised by a few commenters regarding minor flaws and inconsistencies in the vehicle's condition. @Jstab pointed out a possible smudge or mark on the dashboard, and @Alex241 expressed confusion about the quality of paint on certain parts of the vehicle. Additionally, @MM65 noted issues such as the peeling headliner, questioning the car's storage conditions, and @ericdev highlighted the automatic trunk pull-down's malfunction, suggesting it may need repairs. Overall, these acknowledgments indicate that while the car has many positive attributes, potential buyers are aware of some imperfections.
|
 |
Positive: @98Roadster expressed enthusiasm for a similar vehicle, referencing his own positive experience with a 1997 C1500 4.3L 5 speed, describing it as a good option despite its slow performance. The description of his own truck as a reliable work vehicle with high mileage suggests a fondness for the robustness of these trucks.
Neutral: @Vitaminc914, who is the seller, highlights the urgency of the auction with only two days remaining, emphasizing that the current condition of the truck presents a great investment opportunity. They are promoting the auction as a no-reserve event, indicating that the ultimate bid will determine the final price without a minimum.
Negative: The overarching sentiment in the comments includes some skepticism about performance, as @98Roadster mentions that his previous truck was slow. This hints at a potential drawback for performance enthusiasts who might be looking for something more powerful.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, particularly highlighting its aesthetic appeal and unique history. @boaboyoz referred to the Devin Special as 'a proper beauty,' while @FORDGTENGR declared it '101% bad ass.' @rdlestrvled praised the car for its nostalgia, stating it brought a smile during his own racing experiences. @OPTECH1 echoed these sentiments, stating that the car 'looks and sounds awesome,' emphasizing the excitement around its potential use in racing events like HSR or SVRA.
Neutral: Several questions arose about the car’s specifications and history, reflecting the community's desire for more detailed information. @Dave_Car_Guy inquired about the total weight and performance figures, as well as documentation from the car’s acquisition. Concerns about race eligibility emerged, with @MikeinWA noting the potential need for detuning due to earlier overdevelopment. The seller, @Petersen6060, responded (The Seller), promising to provide additional information, including more photos and details on the car's conditions, but acknowledged the lack of comprehensive history logs for some donations.
Negative: Some commenters expressed skepticism about the car’s authenticity and suitability for competition. @stefanwiesen questioned whether it was an authentic 1950s race car or a recreation, which could significantly affect its value—a sentiment echoed by @rdlestrvled, who noted the car's 1990s assembly. @Dmart121 raised doubts regarding the vehicle's historical race participation, finding no records of it competing in notable events. In addition, @carson shared a concerning experience related to the air cleaner, suggesting that it could be a potential risk during races.
|
 |
Positive: @Costis (The Seller) has emphasized the vehicle's true mileage and overall condition, describing the car as super clean and drives phenomenally. He has encouraged potential buyers to reach out for a pre-purchase inspection and has disclosed that he found extra items like a car cover, which adds value to the sale. @Foo2rama praised the SMG transmission system for its performance, noting that it resembles a manual transmission without some of the difficulties of stop-and-go traffic and is more responsive than earlier automatic models. @Costis confirmed the SMG system operates flawlessly in both manual and automatic modes, indicating no service was needed at the current mileage.
Neutral: Comments from @cocojoe suggest that low-mileage vehicles can exist, sharing his own experience with a 2004 Z4 that also has low mileage. @Costis shared insights about the vehicle's history, addressing the concerns about its previous ownership and the connection to the original owner. The conversation around the SMG transmission provided useful information, with @LT_IDWSCWUSN expressing gratitude for the insights provided by @Foo2rama about throttle techniques, which could enhance driving experience for potential buyers.
Negative: Skepticism was voiced by @MartiDee regarding the authenticity of the claimed mileage for a 20-year-old car with multiple owners. @DarrellR raised concerns about the contradictions between the low mileage and the visible wear on the car, questioning its care by previous owners. Additionally, @Dustyrd suggested that the seller should provide a CarFax report to clarify the vehicle's maintenance history and validate the low mileage, highlighting a need for transparency given the discrepancies mentioned in other comments.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praised the vehicle as an 'absolutely wonderful International Land Yacht Ambassador,' highlighting its light and airy layout, beautiful kitchen, and elegant finishes. @JMart56 also commended the stunning remodel, while @Hoppy18 lauded the vehicle's unique design. @neurogoop, the seller, responded to inquiries, providing information about the interior space and showcasing a picture of the built-in dog kennel, which was further appreciated by @Dollycat3.
Neutral: @Dollycat3 asked about the approximate interior square footage and the built-in dog kennel, showing interest in the details. @HappyD inquired about the holding tanks and toilet style, while @Cdollar and @Dzzazz raised questions about the water storage and towing conditions. The seller @neurogoop clarified that while the vehicle has space for tanks, it does not come with them. @TGGG inquired about the pickup location, and @faktm222 expressed interest in viewing the trailer in person.
Negative: Concerns were raised, particularly by @Royall66 regarding the lack of holding tanks and whether this vehicle was better suited as a casita rather than a travel trailer. @Cdollar expressed confusion about the absence of water tanks and the implications for utility. @Dzzazz questioned the condition of the towing system and the effectiveness of heating during harsh Montana winters, while @neurogoop admitted that while the vehicle was not winterized at present, it had been winterized each year since purchase, not providing a complete assurance for winter performance.
|
 |
Positive: @Sumser describes the bike as a 'Cool bike,' reflecting his satisfaction. @Zodiarchy expresses enthusiasm about the bike's engine, calling it 'neat,' and @Searle804 notes how Eric Buell was innovative, marveling at the bike's 26 years. @SidecarPluto reminisces about the joy of riding the 'Red Stripe' version, proudly recalling it as both a great bike to ride and admire, showing that the bike has had positive experiences and memories associated with it.
Neutral: @dwdecker (The Seller) shares a detailed history and technical features of the Buell X1 Lightning, emphasizing its unique aspects and original condition. @longlostczech, as an owner of a similar model, offers a comparative insight, highlighting the Buell's thrilling performance despite acknowledging its vulnerabilities. Meanwhile, @dwdecker (The Seller) discusses the bike's prior ownership history, noting its long-standing care and preservation, which gives context to its current condition.
Negative: @Zuze expresses regret about selling their Lightning, indicating a sense of loss that many may relate to when parting with a cherished vehicle. @longlostczech points out some downsides, such as the bike's top-heavy nature and potential parts availability issues, while pointing out the uncomfortable experience at idle, illustrating that there are aspects of the bike that could be improved.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described as a beautiful, all-original 1970 Ford F-250 4x4 highboy that was bought from an older lady in Athol, Idaho. @americanprideclassics (The Seller) emphasizes that the truck runs and drives exceptionally well, even after a 10-hour journey back to Oregon. The seller highlights that the truck has undergone a full tune-up, which has improved its performance, making it reliable for long trips. @Oregon_crewcabs also comments positively on the cleaning of the motor, appreciating the aesthetic improvement. Overall, the consensus is that this truck, referred to as a 'true cowboy truck', is a reliable driver.
Neutral: Several comments seek clarifications about the vehicle's condition and areas needing attention. @RRC427 asks about any known issues with the truck, including the status of the motor, transmission, and brakes, while @zeammom inquires if the cab mounts are rusted. @bearden expresses interest in seeing clear photographs of the truck's common rust spots and details regarding the truck's modifications, such as the presence of a vacuum gauge and the exhaust system. @Coutu raises a question about the extent of the rust described in the listing. @Mateo-Angel and others also seek information about missing parts, indicating there is a general desire for transparency regarding the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about potential issues with the truck’s condition. @oldguyoldbikes points out a discrepancy regarding the brakes, noting that the listing incorrectly states it has power-assisted disc brakes. @bearden expresses apprehension about possible hidden rust, mentioning visible holes in the passenger floor, which may suggest deeper issues. Additionally, @zeammom questions the condition of cab mounts, implying potential rot. @ALuongo and @1tuxedo ask for close-up photos to inspect the cab mounts for rot holes, showcasing a cautious interest from potential buyers regarding the potential for undisclosed problems.
|
 |
Positive: @JaDawgPNW expressed enthusiasm about the truck, praising its compact size and manual transmission, reminiscing on how such vehicles used to be more common in the past. @passitbob noted that this could be one of the cleanest, most original 1985 Toyota pickups in the world, describing it as beautiful. @Greatwhite97 highlighted the low mileage on the vehicle, indicating its pristine condition. @Bigski1 (The Seller) provided additional details about the truck's condition such as the original paint's shine, lack of rust, and well-maintained components, reinforcing the overall quality of the vehicle.
Neutral: @rbrodniak discussed the value of the truck, noting the sticker price of $7.9k would translate to about $24k by 2025, and compared it favorably to modern trucks that tend to be more complicated and expensive. @Indetrucks asked whether the truck was carbureted or EFI, expressing appreciation for its low mileage. @omrbondo confirmed the overall good looks of the truck but inquired about possible rust spots and dents, showing some curiosity about its imperfections.
Negative: @Bigski1 (The Seller) acknowledged a small dent near the passenger side rear bumper that can be seen in the photos, which represents the truck's only noticeable flaw. He also mentioned a non-functional rear cargo light, but he emphasized that everything else, including gauges and features, worked perfectly, indicating minimal issues overall but acknowledging these minor concerns.
|
 |
Positive: @Atlcarfan (The Seller) presents the 2010 Porsche Carrera 4S as a well-maintained vehicle, highlighting its splendid condition since ownership began in 2014. The special leather interior in Cocoa Brown has received praise, as well as the aftermarket exhaust that produces a distinctive sound without being too loud. Commenters such as @GDogg and @Chris_F appreciate the car's aesthetic appeal, solid care from the owner, and the desirable features it possesses, including the Sport Chrono Plus package and clean service records. Both @CBS3tennis and @EddyS echo sentiments of confidence in bidding due to the owner's attention to detail and the vehicle's impressive performance on the road.
Neutral: The comments reflect a general interest in the vehicle's unique features, such as the TechArt wing that @Jessannjoh inquired about, although @Atlcarfan stated that the original deck lid was not available. @Chadmiller raised a question regarding maintenance history and axle replacement, and @Atlcarfan provided an explanation about the CV joint issue. The seller continues to share videos and additional information via updates, indicating an ongoing engagement with prospective bidders and enthusiasts, while informing them about the vehicle's location and performance potential.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle appear to be minimal, with @Chadmiller questioning the axle repair noted in the CarFax report, which @Atlcarfan addressed by sharing the reason for the replacement and reassurance about the reliability of such repairs in the model. No significant negative feedback was evident in the comments, leading to a generally positive atmosphere surrounding the auction. However, some comments suggest that despite overall appreciation for the car, not everyone may favor the added wing, which was a personal adjustment for the seller.
|
 |
Positive: @Brenbreh9292 (The Seller) describes the truck as extremely solid, indicating that it has been well taken care of throughout its life. They emphasize that there are no weird noises and everything related to steering and the front end feels tight, suggesting a reliable vehicle. @Brenbreh9292 (The Seller) expresses confidence that the buyer will be extremely happy with this truck, reinforcing the positive impression of its condition.
Neutral: @jzglinicki requests additional photos of the bed, seeking more visual information. @Mcs1423 inquires about the vehicle's transfer case capability for flat towing and asks for a window sticker copy to clarify its Z71 specifications. @Risinger55 expresses uncertainty about certain details and mentions needing to do some research when they return home, highlighting an interest in understanding the truck better.
Negative: @911_M5_Dino raises concerns about the authenticity of the Z71 package, noting that the wheels on the truck do not match the standard Z71 specifications, and the absence of a skid plate and 'Z71' sticker adds to their doubts. @Lonesource asks if the truck requires any known maintenance or attention, implying potential worries about its condition despite the seller's assurances.
|
 |
Positive: @G4bryan praises the vehicle as a "Beautiful COBRA!!" and highlights their love for its color. @KeithD1965 (The Seller) mentions the fun experiences at car shows, where others took pictures with the car, indicating its popularity and appeal. Additionally, @KeithD1965 shares an exhilarating experience of racing the car at Palm Beach International Speedway, expressing confidence in its track capability and handling, stating, "This car hugged the road like it was glued to it."
Neutral: @KeithD1965 notes that the vehicle has a 430hp engine, which enhances its performance. When addressing @RASVIPER7's concerns about comfort for taller drivers, @KeithD1965 discusses the snugness of the footwell and the pedal box in these types of cars, confirming that while it may feel tight initially, many drivers, including those over 6 feet tall, adapt well. He also offers additional accessories, including a high-quality German leather soft top and a lightweight car cover, emphasizing the car's overall value and aesthetics.
Negative: @Bignuke raises a concern about the condition of the driver-side front fender, questioning whether it is damaged or scratched based on photos from the gallery, indicating potential issues with the vehicle's exterior that might need addressing. This uncertainty about the fender adds a note of caution for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg described the vehicle as a "Stunning GTC Speed!" and wished the seller best wishes. The overall aesthetic impression seems to be very positive among those appreciating the vehicle's looks.
Neutral: Several comments requested additional information, such as @TTSS asking if the plastic vacuum hoses were replaced and what condition the pump is in, reflecting a neutral concern for maintenance. @Mcdjohn wanted the tire dates, while @Remy22 requested videos demonstrating the functionality of the convertible top and trunk, indicating a general interest in understanding the vehicle better without expressing negative sentiment.
Negative: @dompulis raised concerns about the chunks of sidewall damage on three of the four tires, indicating a potential issue that could affect safety or performance. @1Marauder also questioned the absence of documentation regarding the tire condition and asked for close-ups of the convertible top's wrinkles, suggesting skepticism about the vehicle's maintenance history. @guri44 inquired if the suspension was sagging after a few days, reflecting doubt about the air ride system's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @DanDuran02 commented that the process was fast, while @Tripwheeler expressed happiness about getting things moving and described the car as very nice. Additionally, @f6n_ayan praised the vehicle as an incredible example, and @Espanolie complimented the E92 M3 for its classic silver over black color scheme and manual transmission, showing a positive enthusiasm for the car.
Neutral: @1600veloce, the seller, provided a detailed overview of the vehicle, highlighting its condition, service history, and availability for appointments to view the car. The seller also noted that while the original wheels were not included, the car had been well-maintained and was stored in a climate-controlled facility. They offered transparency regarding the car's minor accident history and repairs made.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's history and specific maintenance details. @Space-Horse inquired about the original wheels and mentioned a minor accident, while @AnthonyT1 asked about the rod bearings, noting the lack of information in the service records. These inquiries suggest a level of caution among prospective buyers regarding critical maintenance and any previous issues with the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Ara1 is very proactive in engaging with potential buyers, providing prompt replies and offering to assist local viewers in seeing the car in person. Commenters like @indy_jones and @willie2323 appreciate the classic aesthetics of the vehicle, acknowledging its attractive old-school look and the effort put into its restoration by the previous owner, Mick, a Vietnam veteran. @cfiorillo offers high praise for the presentation of the car, suggesting it captures its charm well, while @mayberry911, despite not favoring four-door models, admits the car is quite impressive.
Neutral: The seller indicates a willingness to answer questions and facilitate logistics for potential buyers, located conveniently near an airport in Colorado Springs. Additional images of the car have been shared, and @Ara1 acknowledges feedback about the quality of the photos, attempting to improve the presentation with further images. The seller has also taken note of the time constraints related to the auction while expressing gratitude for the bids received thus far.
Negative: On the downside, @Pacheco167 criticizes the initial photographs of the car, claiming they do not do it justice and suggest the car appeared to be a project vehicle due to poor presentation at first glance. This negative comment points to a potential issue that could deter interested buyers if not rectified adequately. Overall, while the car is well-received visually by some, there are concerns about the initial photographic representation that may affect perception.
|
 |
Positive: @GaryRoach describes the vehicle as one of the most fun drivers' cars, praising the joyful scene captured in the background of the cover photo. @Britnic777 appreciates the lead photo's nostalgic 1980s vibe, indicating that it resembles a classic brochure shot, albeit with humorous reference to the couple's fashion choices. @Owenrain (The Seller) mentions that the vehicle also comes with two keys, suggesting added value for prospective buyers.
Neutral: @GLWTA,ModMINI expresses strong attachment to their own vehicle by stating they will never sell it, which highlights a general appreciation for the model among enthusiasts. This sentiment is echoed by others who recognize the car's appeal without necessarily making a purchase decision.
Negative: @redtanrt10 acknowledges the car is a nice driver with a perfect dash and clean shift knob but notes that it requires some work, hinting at potential concerns about its overall condition. They reflect on whether a prospective buyer, particularly the person who jumped out with $8k, will indeed follow through with their purchase, indicating uncertainty about the vehicle's desirability despite its aesthetic appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @Vic (The Seller) describes the 450 SL as a beautiful vehicle in a rare color, emphasizing its good condition and originality. Commentors like @PJConnelly express admiration for the original paint and color, while @Mozart finds the car lovely. Overall, the vehicle is perceived positively for its aesthetic appeal and condition.
Neutral: @Vic (The Seller) provides various details about the vehicle's specifications and history responding to inquiries about service records, rust, and the original parts. @camfen and @yessir raise relevant questions about the car's service history and condition, showing interest without expressing strong opinions. The information shared helps potential buyers assess the car's value and condition.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the lack of service records by @camfen, and questions were made about its ability to pass California smog standards by @Flacco. Additionally, @yessir asked about the convertible top's condition and whether it was original, implying a concern regarding potential replacements or repairs. The mention of a dash cap by @camfen also indicates a possible issue about the vehicle's interior integrity.
|
 |
Positive: @jeffmayfield described the vehicle as "a beauty" while @Bmarcum remarked that it has "the best looking exhaust" they have seen in an early Bronco, praising its aesthetic design. @boaboyoz referred to the Bronco as a "marvelous metallic gray" and commended its stylish build. @tthardtimes shared a personal account of admiring the Bronco during a visit to the seller's shop, noting that his partner fell in love with it, which underscores the vehicle's appeal and desirability among prospective buyers.
Neutral: @LRC_919 (The Seller) expressed enthusiasm about bringing the Bronco to the BaT community, stating that it was a solid example that required extra work to meet the high standards of their restorations. The seller indicated they will be posting a walkaround and driving video soon and urged potential buyers to ask questions. Additionally, various commenters inquired about specific features of the vehicle, like the fit of the hardtop and whether the rear seats fold, indicating a healthy interest and engagement with the auction.
Negative: Some participants raised concerns regarding aspects of the Bronco that were not initially clear. @Hurleyjoseph50 and @AvidCollector questioned whether the hardtop fit correctly and expressed a desire to see more pictures with it installed, indicating that the lack of visual information around the hardtop could be a drawback. The conversation reflected a small amount of skepticism about the truck's features, specifically about whether the roll cage was custom and if the seller's timeline of ownership was consistent with previous listings.
|
 |
Positive: @davidbreden (The Seller) has assured potential buyers that the vehicle has solid floor pans and a rust-free frame, highlighting that it has always been garaged and never seen snow. He has also confirmed that the air conditioning works well, providing a specific temperature reading from the vents. The seller seems committed to answering queries and sharing additional photos to showcase the condition of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters have asked for further details on the vehicle's condition, including requests for pictures of the floor pans and inquiries about the functionality of the air conditioning. Notably, @kevinkroll, a seasoned BaT seller, suggested that the seller include more photos of the underbody and frame to enhance the auction listing. @4beans also pointed out a correction regarding the model designation, which was acknowledged and updated by BaT.
Negative: There are concerns regarding the aesthetic modifications of the vehicle, specifically related to the diamond plate, as @terrygreen questioned whether it served as decoration or was hiding rust. Additionally, @steelergimp inquired about the towing history of the jeep, suggesting the need for further transparency about its usage. The seller, @davidbreden, has addressed some issues such as the previous catalytic converter replacement, but there remains a level of skepticism among potential buyers regarding the overall condition and usage history.
|
 |
Positive: @MarkNeely praised the truck's aesthetics, calling it a "great lookin truck" and wishing everyone good luck with the auction. @Spacemntn referred to the vehicle as a "badass truck," indicating a strong positive impression of its overall appeal.
Neutral: @FLH1961 inquired about whether the truck is an original short bed or if a long bed C10 was shortened, seeking clarity on its history. @68blue commented that the truck looks nice but feels it is "a bit tall" for personal preference. @Lakeman00 asked for the engine code, acknowledging the need for additional technical specifications to assess the vehicle's capabilities.
Negative: @cjobrien raised concerns regarding the construction of the lift by questioning if the rear axle has double-stacked lift blocks and requested more pictures for clarity, which indicates a need for detailed understanding before considering a bid. @Spacemntn suggested reengineering the lift to better suit driving needs, hinting at possible safety or usability issues. Additionally, @cjobrien expressed skepticism about the vehicle's frame and its modifications by asking if the chassis is original or from a different vehicle, pointing to uncertainties about the truck's integrity.
|
46k-Mile 2004 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD LS Extended Cab Duramax 4×4
1GCHK29254E306598
Lot 210736
Private Party
 |
Positive: Several comments express enthusiasm and admiration for the vehicle, particularly praising its condition and features. @CRUSH complimented the design, referring to it as a 'nice cat eye.' @NateFox pointed out that the vehicle is a crew cab short box with specific body dimensions, demonstrating awareness of the model's attributes. @TowBossHD (The Seller) reassured potential buyers of the truck's excellent ride quality and solid frame, emphasizing the vehicle's good maintenance history, including undercoating that was applied at purchase.
Neutral: Some comments reflect curiosity and neutral inquiries about the truck's specifications and history. @winerack and @Ronson68L78 asked questions about the vehicle's body size and usage, showing interest but not expressing firm opinions. @PondBoss confirmed the wheelbase specifications by referencing the RPO sticker, while @Tang35 inquired about additional details such as the injector balance rates. Overall, these comments lack strong emotions but demonstrate engagement with the auction process.
Negative: A few commenters expressed concerns about specific aspects of the vehicle. @sofakingbad raised skepticism about the effectiveness of undercoating by questioning why it is used to 'hide' rust, implying it could be a potential issue. @Ronson68L78 noted that the HD overload springs and fifth wheel mounts implied heavy usage, mentioning that the undercoating could be a deal-breaker for them. @deano2023 questioned the vehicle's paint and noted visible rust on the driveline, while expressing a desire for more detailed information regarding the original ownership.
|
 |
Positive: @SharkOfTheWood notes that the vehicle's paint color is white and indicates there is no soft top, suggesting a good understanding of the vehicle's condition. @TZORN (The Seller) confirms that the vehicle was stored indoors and states no additional rust is known beyond what has been identified, which can be seen in the hood's underside. @MRLind offers helpful advice on sourcing a soft top, indicating that other options might be available if the seller doesn't provide guidance.
Neutral: @Chattanooga inquires about rust in the frame and the color beneath the wrap, demonstrating a cautious approach to understanding potential issues. The same user also asks for pictures of the doors and under the mats, reflecting a desire for clarity on the vehicle condition. @TrapperCreekCollector expresses curiosity about the presence of a soft top, reflecting a common concern for prospective buyers to ensure compatibility with existing features.
Negative: @dogandponyshow raises a concern regarding the cost of replacing rusted crossmembers, suggesting that repair might be quite expensive. @WAGONBOYTD elaborates on this issue, estimating repair costs around $3,000, which could be a significant investment for potential buyers. Additionally, @dogandponyshow comments on the presence of new bidders, hinting at skepticism regarding their intent and involvement.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its beautiful appearance and desirable features. @pkalber specifically highlighted the GT3 wheels as enhancing the car's look, while @LeftSideKeys praised the comfort seats, particularly for taller drivers, indicating that they are preferable for long drives. Commenters also seemed enthusiastic about the car's performance, with @2ontheground and @bmdaia commenting on its swift acceleration and impressive handling, referring to the 996 Turbo as a peak example of the Porsche 911 model.
Neutral: Some comments provided neutral information or inquiries about specific aspects of the car, such as @marbarr questioning the quick sale after low mileage has been added, and @bwy5000 asking if the seller had the original wheels. @VladG requested feedback from previous owners regarding their experiences with the vehicle, demonstrating an interest in its condition and representation in the sale. Additionally, @WZYWAL (The Seller) provided updates on the vehicle's service history, mentioning various maintenance tasks that have been completed, thus reassuring potential bidders about the car's reliability.
Negative: A few negative comments arose regarding potential concerns about the vehicle. @segura911 mentioned a knocking sound heard in the engine during a video, prompting clarifications about normal sound behavior in Mezger engines from @WZYWAL (The Seller). @BigTaco pointed out that the right side exhaust seemed to hang lower than the left, raising questions about the car's fit and finish. Finally, @junkyardawg requested confirmation about the startup sounds of the engine, implying some uncertainty about the car's mechanical condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express excitement about the vehicle, highlighting its unique design and capabilities. @RobFL mentions seeing the Wombat on 3rd street, while @Jsutt99 admits a newfound desire for such a car due to its cool factor. @ykassar (The Seller) enthusiastically shares their enjoyment of owning the vehicle, noting how it attracts attention and smiles from onlookers, which adds to its appeal. Commenters like @UnimogU65 appreciate the technical aspects, referencing the front suspension kit, showcasing an overall admiration for its rare features.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the vehicle's condition and recent work. @Y2K911 inquires about any work done by the seller, to which @ykassar responds with details about a new steering wheel installation and repairs including an oil change and fixing a leak. @Rosemary and @rpopsbravo ask if there are any available tops for the vehicle, with @ykassar explaining that they would likely need to be custom-made. Additionally, @WJL2953 questions the specifications of the car's components, suggesting an ongoing interest in the mechanical details of the kit car.
Negative: Despite the positive enthusiasm, there are some concerns raised. @WJL2953 asks about the compatibility of the CV joints and the wires under the hood, indicating a need for clarification on technical elements that may affect performance. Other commenters express worries about the lack of available tops for weather protection, with @rpopsbravo voicing uncertainty after seeing the seller's previous answer. However, the overall sentiment remains mostly positive as the seller remains engaged and encourages interested buyers to inspect the vehicle directly.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the appeal and potential of the vehicle. @Stateofmike shares their personal joy in owning a similar model, mentioning it was fun for camping and driving. @unkleernie praises the work put into the vehicle, while @Acorn19 expresses admiration for its sweetness and potential. The seller also emphasizes the rarity of the van, noting that only a limited number were built, which adds to its appeal as a collector's item.
Neutral: Several questions and clarifications were posed regarding details of the vehicle, with @Mattmann5209 asking for the opening height of the rear doors and @Streamliner inquiring about the transfer case's origin. @Bajabronco seeks information about the door data tag, while @SmileyFace and @moneybags ask for measurements and the possibility of an in-person visit, respectively. The seller, @Taylor42Nelson, promptly provides the requested information and clarifies any misunderstandings related to measurements.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition. @moneybags requested photos of rusty areas for repair assessment, indicating a potential issue with the vehicle's maintenance. @JackSweny expressed worries regarding the absence of exterior handles on the service doors, which could affect functionality. Moreover, @moneybags expressed skepticism about the availability of parts for the 'rare' van, hinting at challenges that could arise for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @BoffrO commented positively on the vehicle, describing it as an honest representation of a reliable car. This implies that the seller has provided a truthful description, which may enhance buyer confidence and indicate good value for the vehicle.
Neutral:
Negative: @VH911 expressed disbelief regarding the car's pricing by commenting, "VH911: $1??????," suggesting that the listed price might be perceived as unrealistic or confusing. There is no further context provided in the comments to clarify this reaction, leaving a potential concern about the vehicle's valuation.
|
 |
Positive: @MontanaBroncos expresses enthusiasm for the Bronco, praising it as a good model and appreciating the choice of engine. They suggest that a peculiar stripe pattern would enhance the vehicle's aesthetics, referencing the classic designs of 1978 and 1979. @Jpowell87 also compliments the Bronco's appearance, expressing interest in the FiTech fuel injection system and its potential benefits for drivability.
Neutral: @dwmattson, the seller, provides insight into the vehicle's condition and history. They clarify that the stripes were removed prior to their ownership and offer reassurance about the quality of the Bronco. The seller highlights recent improvements, including a new rear glass regulator and motor, and assures potential buyers that everything works as it should. They also share information about the FiTech system, explaining its functionality and advantages over previous carburetors.
Negative: @bimmere39m5 points out some drawbacks, noting that the front fenders and doors had been repainted without restoring the stripes, leading to a noticeable color variance. They also mention minor rust appearing on the rear fender well, indicating concerns about the vehicle's aging in a coastal climate. @Jbrown89 expresses curiosity regarding the stripe situation and implies dissatisfaction with the modifications, while another user hints at potential bidding issues despite a generally favorable outlook.
|
 |
Positive: @Moparmadness expressed strong admiration for the car's beauty and color, wishing to see it in sunlight. @Bj123 praised the beautiful restoration of the classic car and inquired about a driving video. @boaboyoz marked the car as a standout entry in the BaT’s Bel Airpalooza, calling it fabulous and extending good luck wishes to the auction.
Neutral: @oldz reminisced positively about owning a car similar to the one for sale, indicating a fondness for the model. @Tedro noted that while restorations are valuable, modifications could enhance the car's market potential greatly. @Vsreden simply referred to the car as a beauty, showing appreciation without elaborating on details.
Negative: @neverenoughgold commented on the car having too many modifications for their taste, suggesting it may not appeal to buyers like them. @Classicgazelle raised a concern about the car's frame showing split welding, making a comparison to a shoddy job. @Collectingclassics pointed out inconsistencies with the vehicle's VIN tag and questioned the authenticity of the body based on their knowledge, raising potential doubts about its restored nature. @gb70 criticized the listing for being short on visuals and engagement, indicating that more information could enhance bidder interest.
|
 |
Positive: Comments regarding the vehicle highlight its impressive modifications and performance. @KARPARK notes that the BMW M Coupe features an Active Autowerke supercharger kit, which has been in place for over a decade, delivering enhanced power and maintaining a smooth driving experience. Additionally, @booch shared that the supercharger significantly upgrades the driving dynamics of the car, providing a linear power delivery similar to that of an S54 engine, which many enthusiasts appreciate. The vehicle's maintenance history is also commendable, with extensive upkeep performed by knowledgeable owners, further contributing to its desirability among collectors and enthusiasts.
Neutral: There are clarifications regarding the vehicle's registration status, with @anthonyjp asking if it is still registered. @KARPARK explained that the tags expired in March 2025 and the vehicle currently has a 'Current application in process' with the DMV due to the need for it to be returned to stock for California registration. Additionally, @FindMyToy inquired about the condition of a cracked dash trim and the timing of brake services, indicating the community’s interest in the car's overall condition and service history, which serves to clarify the vehicle's usability for potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the registration and potential issues of getting the vehicle compliant with California regulations. @KARPARK mentioned that returning the car to stock and BAR-inspection to issue new tags would be a challenge, which might deter some buyers who are not interested in such processes. Also, the small crack noted in the dash trim by @FindMyToy suggests the car has some cosmetic flaws, which could be a point of negotiation for potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciated the well-maintained condition of the vehicle, with @SDSwede noting it evokes nostalgic memories, and @Barryward humorously suggesting it was time for a beer upon seeing the vehicle. @2hecknback highlighted the rarity of tailgated models and the robust construction of the Iltis, which makes it well-suited for off-road use. @maxreh expressed a strong desire to own this vehicle, categorizing it as one of his top choices in the Puch lineup. @MarcGetty praised the vehicle's off-road capabilities, emphasizing its compact width that allows for accessibility to places larger vehicles can't reach.
Neutral: There was a mix of curiosity and practical inquiries regarding the vehicle. @OliverTwist78 questioned its placement in the French vehicle category, which @bringatrailer confirmed had been updated. @Drdjet raised concerns about the vehicle’s functionality, specifically inquiring about non-operational features and the lack of completed safety inspections during the seven years of ownership. @cantfinditgrindit was interested in understanding the fitment for taller individuals, indicating a need for specific information related to comfort.
Negative: Some commenters expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition and the seller's transparency. @Drdjet pointed out that there were issues with the inoperative four-way flashers and questioned the lack of safety inspection stickers, indicating potential neglect in maintenance. These concerns reflected a desire for more detailed information about the vehicle's operational status and history, which could affect potential buyers' trust.
|
 |
Positive: @Mjhenk expressed a strong liking for the S110P pickup, noting that it could be the perfect vehicle if it had air conditioning. This enthusiasm suggests that the vehicle has features that many customers appreciate, even though it lacks certain amenities like A/C. The general quality of Japanese fire trucks, including low mileage and excellent condition, has been highlighted by @JDMcarsFL, indicating that the vehicle is well-maintained and appealing to potential buyers.
Neutral: @letthegypsyhaveit asked whether the Hijet is only for off-highway use, to which @JDMcarsFL clarified that the vehicle is road legal in most states, urging people to confirm their local regulations. This indicates that while some buyers may have concerns about the vehicle’s use, it is indeed functional for everyday driving under certain conditions. The presence of a clean Florida title further establishes its legal standing for potential buyers.
Negative: @1171lincoln raised a concern about the possibility of retrofitting an A/C system to the fire truck, questioning whether it would be feasible. @JDMcarsFL responded, indicating that it is possible, but would require specific parts. Additionally, @WickedSpeed pointed out the absence of a tailgate and inquired about sourcing one, suggesting that availability could be a challenge. These comments reflect concerns prospective buyers may have regarding modifications and parts availability for the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics has highlighted the impressive features and condition of the 1998 BMW Z3, emphasizing its low mileage, original paint, and meticulous ownership history. The vehicle is powered by a desirable 6-cylinder 2.8L engine, which enhances its appeal to discerning buyers. The seller assures that it has been well-maintained with a detailed service record demonstrating extensive preventive maintenance that supports the car's investment value.
Neutral: In response to inquiries from @alkutka and @mikeor, the seller provided information about the vehicle's maintenance and condition, confirming that the tires are brand new and the trunk welds are in excellent shape. @mikeor noted a preference for more information on the options available for the car, questioning the designation of sport seats and requesting a window sticker. Additionally, @NjBuyer asked about the CD player functionality, to which the seller confirmed it works.
Negative: @mikeor raised concerns about the amount of repairs recorded for a car with only 25,000 miles, suggesting that there may be underlying issues contributing to the extensive maintenance. This sentiment was echoed by @Jimmynj, who dismissed the apprehension about repairs as 'ridiculous,' arguing that the maintenance performed is standard preventive care for an older vehicle, implying a need for context regarding the vehicle's age rather than questioning its quality.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors praised the 2009 Cadillac DTS-L for its rarity and luxurious features, making it a standout vehicle in any setting. @DraganMitic remarked on its distinctiveness and rarity, while @Scott_S appreciated its understated appearance, suggesting it may go unnoticed next to other vehicles on the highway. Several users admired its design and anticipated a pleasant driving experience, indicating it as a comfortable option for both passengers and drivers, particularly with the spaciousness added by the stretch modification.
Neutral: The seller, @howS, detailed the car's background, indicating it was originally used as a family car in Philadelphia and highlighting the model's limited availability, especially for 2009 and beyond. Commentors also engaged in discussions about the vehicle’s specifications, including emission capabilities with @rwhughes asking about California emission compliance. There was a collaborative atmosphere where knowledgeable users shared insights about the Cadillac DTS-L's construction and market position against its competitors, such as Lincoln.
Negative: Some comments reflected curiosity and skepticism, particularly regarding the vehicle's conversion and its market value with @gregpryckman questioning the extent of the stretch and its implications. @Rayzer inquired about practicality issues, such as the registration process for prospective buyers, while others expressed concerns, including a mention of a minor blemish noted in the seller's report. Overall, while the majority reflected admiration, a few queries were rooted in skepticism about the vehicle's market appeal and practical aspects.
|
 |
Positive: @Jayule noted the vehicle's clean frame, which is a strong positive point for potential buyers. @SpeakerPhoneJones remarked on the rarity of finding such a well-maintained 4Runner, adding a layer of value to the representation made by @shamo316. @Bensherrard1 echoed this sentiment by highlighting the unique Salsa Red Pearl color, suggesting it would make a great long-term investment. Additionally, @Jno1990 commented on how helpful the pictures and videos were in making an informed decision to bid on this vehicle.
Neutral: @shamo316 (The Seller) engaged with potential buyers, providing information about the vehicle's air conditioning, service records from Carfax, and confirmed the vehicle is rust-free. @Stropp raised questions about the vehicle's service history and any potential transmission issues, to which the seller promptly responded. @mdoyle24 inquired about the timing belt's status and the XREAS Sport suspension, showing that while people are interested, they have specific questions about the vehicle's mechanics.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @TWS0331 regarding the leak indicated in picture 177, with an observer questioning whether it was just AC condensation or something more problematic. @HilsonMotors expressed curiosity about why @shamo316 was selling the vehicle so soon after purchasing it, suggesting some skepticism about the seller's intentions. @TWS0331 also noted an oily appearance around the suspected leak, prompting a request for further verification pictures from the seller to alleviate buyer concerns.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's originality and condition, with @jkitsmiller urging potential buyers to embrace its current state rather than restoring it. @MacDaddy1 described it as an "absolute beauty," while @Purelife33 noted the vehicle's rarity and straightforward characteristics that warrant appreciation. Several comments highlighted the vehicle's impressive structural integrity, particularly @ShawnMT (The Seller), who emphasized the cleanliness of the bus and the lack of previous repairs, suggesting it as both a fun vehicle to drive and a solid candidate for restoration.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle's restoration potential varied, with some commenters discussing the costs associated with restoring classic vehicles. @cars20thcentury estimated a restoration costing between $40,000 to $50,000, while @tdubz510 mentioned a range of $30,000 to $80,000, depending on the level of work needed. @Amskeptic provided technical insights regarding its air-cooled engine, encouraging proper maintenance and upgrades. Additionally, @ShawnMT (The Seller) clarified engine specifications, replying to inquiries about its actual horsepower, which revealed a mixed setup with a 40hp engine head on a larger displacement case.
Negative: On the downside, some comments raised concerns about potential hidden issues, particularly regarding the vehicle's roof and restoration history. @bastardbus mentioned severe roof damage that might have contributed to its initial lack of sales, suggesting that the white epoxy primer could be concealing deeper problems. Inquiring about rust, @pablo2nd expressed skepticism about the undercoating's effectiveness, prompting @ShawnMT (The Seller) to reassure that the underlying metal was still in excellent condition. However, concerns lingered about the vehicle's adaptation and modifications, which some saw as detrimental to its classic value.
|
 |
Positive: @JORA_Imports highlighted the Honda Del Sol SI as a well-preserved vehicle, mentioning its clean condition, absence of accidents, and enjoyable driving experience. The seller emphasized the car's reliability, fun nature, and peace of mind it offers to the new owner. Commenters @Qhua and @jeffward25 agreed, praising the car's interior aesthetics and responsiveness, noting it as a highly valued option for affordable sports car enjoyment.
Neutral: @1971GP inquired about the potential for additional media showcasing the vehicle's condition, such as walk-around or driving videos, particularly focusing on the state of the paint and clear coat. @Pjh2 asked whether there was any documentation regarding the timing belt replacement, showing interest in the car's maintenance history. The seller noted the auction's urgency, reminding participants that it was a no-reserve event.
Negative: While overall comments were positive, the inquiries by @1971GP and @Pjh2 suggest some uncertainty regarding the car's presentation and maintenance history. Lack of detailed media and confirmation of critical service like the timing belt change could raise red flags for potential bidders looking for a well-documented vehicle. This indicates that while there is enthusiasm for the vehicle, some buyers might hesitate without further verification of its condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Jhazel1970 expressed a strong interest in the vehicle, noting that it had upgraded various components, which indicates that the buyer sees value in the past enhancements made to the bike. This interest reflects positively on the bike's appeal and suggests that it has desirable features that might attract potential buyers.
Neutral: @FieldBean, the seller, clarified misconceptions by confirming that the bike had not been laid down and that only basic maintenance was performed. The seller also noted that the previous owner had mostly kept the bike in a garage, which implies that the vehicle may have been well cared for during that time. The discussion around the less frequent use of the bike can be seen as a neutral point that might appeal to some buyers but raise questions among others.
Negative: @wetwillyskate raised concerns about the bike's condition by asking if it had been laid down, indicating potential skepticism about its maintenance history. Furthermore, @Jhazel1970's queries about parts removal signal a perception that the bike's current state might differ from what was initially presented, implying a lack of transparency or possible concerns regarding its overall value and upgrades.
|
 |
Positive: @Spintrips describes the 1959 Corvette as a gorgeous car and compliments the excellent photos provided for the auction. @taosman54 expresses that this is the car they have always wanted, citing it as their favorite year and color combo, while wishing good luck to the seller with the auction.
Neutral: @out_a_room (The Seller) actively engages with potential buyers by providing detailed responses to their inquiries about the car's condition and history. The seller clarifies that the vehicle has no power steering or brakes, that the heater works, and outlines the current state of the gauges. They also mention that the last oil change was in November 2024, and there is a slight leak under the transmission. They address questions about paint blemishes and provide context about the car's documentation and previous ownership.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about the car's condition. @Beachinca points out that many pictures show paint blemishes and cracking, questioning if it's just a reflection. @jojo6686 raises additional concerns about the engine not being original and asks about the frequency of breakdowns, prompting a response from the seller regarding a starter relay issue that was corrected. Other commenters like @Buddy2 inquire about specific features and possible leaks, indicating a need for further transparency regarding the vehicle's overall reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and mechanical quality. @Dollycat3 referred to it as 'beautiful' and noted the 'wonderful work' done on it. @Stuttgart_Steel praised the mechanical attention it received and remarked on its impressive paint job, while @GDogg called the car 'completely divine.' Overall, the 6.9 is described affectionately by former owners and enthusiasts who emphasize both its luxury and performance characteristics.
Neutral: Several comments provide factual insights into the vehicle's history and specifications. @Maddie1175 raised questions about the interior condition, to which @DC_MotorWerks (The Seller) explained that the focus was on mechanical restoration. There's a discussion regarding the distinction between the W116 and V116 models, with @Dollycat3 clarifying that 'V116' refers to the long-wheelbase versions of the first S-Class. Commenters have shared technical aspects and personal experiences, contributing to a richer understanding of the car's legacy.
Negative: Conversely, some comments reflect concerns about the vehicle's modifications. @Jive criticized the decision to reinstall less desirable US-spec headlights and bumpers, expressing disappointment that superior Euro components were not retained. Additionally, @robear46 shared a negative purchasing experience regarding a previous vehicle from the same dealership, highlighting issues with the engine block repair. These voices indicate that while the car is revered, not all aspects of its restoration and customization have been well-received by all audience members.
|
 |
Positive: The feedback shared by @FirehouseVintage highlights their enthusiasm for offering the XF Supercharged, which they personally bought for its appealing design and performance features. They appreciate the green over tan color scheme and believe the 4.2 engine provides better reliability compared to the more powerful 5.0 version. The seller also emphasizes that the vehicle has been maintained with attention to detail, including addressing a coolant issue by replacing hoses and installing a new pulley, showcasing the car's performance capability which 'pulls like a freight train.'
Neutral: Commenters such as @HLECK23 and @Metompkin1325 have engaged with the seller by asking specific questions regarding the vehicle's performance details and condition. Queries about the original sticker information, the age of the tires, and concerns about a blemish on the dashboard show that potential buyers are interested in the vehicle's overall state. The seller has responded kindly, providing detailed information about the tires' replacement dates and the current condition of the dashboard, indicating that while the blemish can be addressed, it would require some effort.
Negative: Concerns have arisen from comments like those from @Metompkin1325 regarding the car's rear badging and potential issues common with these models, such as electronic gremlins. While the seller assures that they have not encountered such problems, it reflects a level of caution among potential buyers who recognize that these vehicles may have quirks due to their age. This apprehension about reliability aspects and the condition of certain features could deter some potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @RumbleAuto praises the vehicle's build quality and driving experience, reminiscing about the exceptional engineering from a different era. They genuinely enjoy driving these cars and express a deep appreciation for their overall design. @JFHsu adds to this sentiment by noting that with only 120,000 miles, the vehicle still looks 'mint,' indicating a solid upkeep and care over the years. @Mercuryman, who has a long-standing admiration for these cars since purchasing one new in 1992, also views the vehicle as a nice example, showing enthusiasm for its condition and appeal.
Neutral: @Bhaag1 (The Seller) confirms that the tachometer is currently working, addressing @Cwbryson's inquiry directly. They also provide information about the door functionality, stating that it opens and closes perfectly, and have even added a door video to showcase this. Additionally, @Bhaag1 explains their decision to leave the wheels as they are, highlighting that this is how their father had it, providing a personal touch to the vehicle's background.
Negative: @pigman raises a concern regarding the driver's side door, asking about the potential for any issues with the hinge pins, hinting at possible wear or functional glitches. The inquiry suggests that while the vehicle is well-loved and maintained, there is still some scrutiny regarding its mechanical components. @Mercuryman expresses a personal opinion that if the vehicle were theirs, they would change the wheels back to the original stock ones, indicating a preference that may contribute to the overall aesthetic appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @buttesilverbow expresses admiration for the bike, praising its aesthetics and design, noting that the model is reminiscent of the iconic 916 while suggesting the 996 improves upon it. @Thomas54 reminisces about his experience with a 2000 model, highlighting its great sound and enjoyment in twisty roads, while also acknowledging its discomfort on highways. @MVOUS is impressed by the bike's low mileage, and @z0e_moto calls it a specimen, remarking on its immaculate condition with personal suggestions for improvement.
Neutral: @Floridaman61 comments on the pristine condition of the 996 but expresses curiosity about the after-market front rotors, appreciating the color on the 196 series bikes. @deadbattery provides a supportive reply, suggesting the availability of OEM rotors and sharing their positive experience with Galfer rotors on other bikes. @ppointer concurs about the Galfer rotors being good, mentioning they have used them successfully on their track bike, though uncertain about the specific rotors on this bike from the provided pictures.
Negative: @SSlinkard questions why new rotors were necessary on a bike with only 1,000 miles, hinting at potential concerns about maintenance or usage. @LFFInc (The Seller) clarifies that the new rotors were a matter of personal preference rather than necessity, as the previous owner opted to customize the bike and lost the factory rotors. The comments reflect a mix of appreciation for the bike's aesthetics and concerns about its maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: @DesertDave2 praised the vehicle, calling it a "WOWZER" and a "Time Warp!" He expressed that this is as close to a brand-new 2005 RT as one could expect to find, noting its stunning appearance. @testdummypilot, the seller, also mentioned the vehicle's exceptional condition, emphasizing the interior's beauty and preservation while providing over 300 pictures and multiple videos to showcase the vehicle's quality. He described the Roadtrek as a true "one-of-a-kind" model with low mileage and the right color combination, promising that it checks all the desired boxes for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries from potential buyers aimed to gather more information about the vehicle's systems and its history. @morrietrautman asked about the functionality of various RV systems, including the generator and refrigerator, while @Graham requested details on the Jasper sticker found on the door jamb and additional images. @testdummypilot reassured interested parties that everything works as intended, with the vehicle stored in climate-controlled conditions. He also explained that he would provide detailed service records and additional photos as requested, illustrating a commitment to transparency.
Negative: Some comments from potential buyers raised concerns about the vehicle. @vwbussed humorously described the RV bathroom layout as the "goofiest" he had seen, while @Bulliet sought more clarity on the bathroom's configuration and the state of the refrigerator, highlighting the need for wider shots to understand the layout better. Additionally, @letthegypsyhaveit pressed the seller for clarity on the Jasper sticker to identify what parts had been replaced, emphasizing the sticker's importance in informing bidders about critical vehicle components. @R.Korn also questioned warranty procedures for the new engine, indicating a desire for documented assurances regarding service coverage.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its unique appearance and color. @Geeze described it as pretty, while @GDogg mentioned it as a 'good lookin GTV 2000 in Gold' and expressed that it’s bellissima. @bobm45 highlighted the rarity and nostalgia associated with the car's color choices from the 70s, describing it as much nicer than the boring colors seen in modern vehicles. The wheels also received positive feedback, with @oklaoz and @Quadrifoglio noting that the Momo Vegas wheels are a refreshing change from the typical options, adding a nice touch to the overall look of the GTV.
Neutral: @RPhillips (The Seller) shared insights into the history and condition of the GTV, detailing how he acquired it from the estate of an Alfa enthusiast and mentioning its older restoration from about 25 years ago. He noted that the car presents nicely, but it is not perfect, which aligns with the comments made by @Borden who asked about the functionality of the wipers and interior lights, indicating a potential electrical issue. Other users like @sgollomp expressed interest in fixing such issues, showing a level of engagement with the car's current state.
Negative: Some comments were skeptical about the seller's commitment to maintaining the vehicle. @wow427 questioned the seller's intentions by remarking on the quick transition from claiming to appreciate the car to selling it. @Borden's inquiry regarding non-functional parts raised concerns about potential underlying problems with the vehicle's electrical system. This skepticism was further echoed by comments about the car possibly not being accurately represented in photographs, with @RogerD suggesting the color might appear different than in real life, leading to concerns about the car's authenticity.
|
 |
Positive: @SHOhobo reminisces about the nostalgic Ford 351ci Holman Moody and the appeal of open headers, highlighting the boat's historical and cultural resonance. @zulu44 calls it a "Bad Ass Boat!", while @Britnic777 admires the impressive ceiling I-beam mounted hoist lift system. @Valiantjim expresses deep appreciation for the evolution of the Hunt hull form, which he has admired since childhood, and acknowledges that the Donzi will handle offshore conditions excellently. @bodhi1601 shares a personal connection to the boat's heritage, fondly recalling the Glastron Carlson models and their significance during his youth in South East Massachusetts. And @Highline9 inquires about maintenance records, suggesting a serious interest in the boat's upkeep and history.
Neutral: Comments from @notforhire and @MikeNCCars clarify observations about the boat's lift system and chains, discussing their operational details. @chbaxter1 (The Seller) provides historical context regarding the boat's background, mentioning it was previously used as a dingy in Florida and has predominantly been in fresh water. @Kkoester appreciates this detail, noting it correlates with the boat's low hours of usage. @bentclark asks logistical questions related to transport and pickup, reflecting a practical interest in acquiring the boat.
Negative: @bodhi1601 raises concerns about the boat's age, questioning whether it has seen salt water and inquiring about its cooling system and potential issues with the wood stringers. @mathsin shares a tragic experience of losing a similar boat, which adds a cautionary tale about the fragility of fiberglass vessels. @notforhire expresses a bit of confusion regarding the first photo, questioning the boat's stability in the image. These comments reflect some apprehensions regarding maintenance and the potential risks associated with owning an older boat.
|
 |
Positive: @Pbedard22 expressed excitement about the vehicle's aesthetics, referring to it as a "beauty" and expressing a desire for additional photos of the undercarriage. @Viper1 shared their personal experience of owning the same model, stating it is a "BLAST." @lunchbocks2002 remarked on the rarity of such quality cars from over 30 years ago, highlighting the challenge of finding Gen I models with original owners.
Neutral: @Kymzad21 (The Seller) provided responses to buyer inquiries, confirming the availability of the rear and side windows with storage bags, owner manuals, and factory literature. They also stated that the vehicle has been minimally driven and stored in a garage, leading to the absence of rock chips or cracks. The seller assured that the pictures provided included the necessary items requested by buyers.
Negative: @Pbedard22 was frustrated after not receiving a reply to a direct message, reiterating the request for undercarriage and additional interior photos. @kkneen2 raised concerns about whether the head gaskets had been replaced and the age of the tires. @pwrful4 requested pictures of imperfections and maintenance records, indicating potential transparency issues with the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's exceptional quality and condition, with several bidders expressing admiration for its cleanliness and well-maintained history. @tgfarrell mentioned the car as one of the best-kept SA models they've seen, while @brettlinton7 praised it as beautiful and well-preserved. Likewise, @GtiKyle noted that the car was cherished by its previous owner, suggesting that the new owner will greatly appreciate the meticulous care it received. The consensus among the commenters is that the vehicle embodies a legacy of respect and passion from its previous owner, further enhancing its value in the eyes of potential buyers.
Neutral: There are some inquiries regarding technical details about the car, such as modifications and features. @nittanylogan pointed out a discrepancy in the stereo system listed, noting the absence of a cassette deck, which @AZrotorhead confirmed would be corrected. Additionally, @Raymiam asked about the emissions system to verify compliance with California regulations, to which it was clarified by @AZrotorhead that the stock emission system was removed. Other comments, like those from @husker444, provide insights into the car's unique features and modifications which reflect its year and model,
Negative: Some commenters expressed concern about the unique modifications that the previous owner made, hinting that they may not align with every enthusiast's personal preferences. For instance, @husker444 asked about the installation of LS power mirror controls, suggesting uncertainty about the car's originality. Furthermore, @baltzerc mentioned that the previous owner had contemplated an engine rebuild before the sale due to mild performance issues, which may lead potential buyers to question the car's reliability. Overall, while many are excited about the auction, there are some reservations pertaining to the modifications and maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: @vfnrcc highlights the excitement and quality of their latest vehicle addition at Bring a Trailer, emphasizing their extensive 50 years of experience in the car industry and understanding of enthusiasts' desires. They convey a sense of pride in presenting handpicked vehicles that meet high standards and vocalize their commitment to quality, uniqueness, and authenticity in their offerings. Additionally, @vfnrcc assures potential buyers of transparent communication and the accuracy of their listings, which are backed by thorough test drives to ensure impeccable condition.
Neutral: @vfnrcc mentions the inclusion of paint meter pictures that demonstrate no paint work on the vehicle, suggesting thorough transparency regarding the vehicle's condition. They also note that the sale of the vehicle includes two keys, which may be seen as a standard offering, contributing to a well-rounded buying experience.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally praised the vehicle's aesthetics and performance. @skosieruxo noted it as 'certainly a nice one', while @AlfaDave described it as the 'most beautiful looking version of the Busso V-6'. @Nero164QV confirmed that it features a 24-valve engine, resonating positively with enthusiasts. Others like @Biscioni_NYC added compliments about the Zender Siena wheels looking great on the 164, and @redlinewins expressed a strong preference for the car's color.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification about specific features of the vehicle. @johnireland inquired about the operation of the right front window, which @1600VeloceAssist clarified, noting it works from the driver’s side switch. @alfaboy164 posed various questions about the vehicle's antenna, trim, power seat functions, HVAC system, and headliner damage, indicating a thorough interest in the car's condition. @Dedot308 raised a concern about a CARFAX entry regarding an airbag deployment, seeking context from the seller.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns about the vehicle's condition and repair history. @oettinger.1 mentioned hesitance over the vehicle sold a week prior due to its non-working HVAC and overdue timing belt. @MM27 pointed out a flashing airbag light on the video, questioning whether it goes off, hinting at potential electrical issues. Moreover, @Zundfolge1-4-3-2 asked about problematic components like the heater core, suggesting common faults associated with the model.
|
 |
Positive: @DCO88 praised the vehicle's specifications and referred to it as a P30, stating that whoever wins it will be very happy, reflecting their own positive experience with a similar model. @hdarth, the seller, expressed appreciation for the comments and acknowledged the excitement surrounding the SL63 AMG, highlighting its great driving experience when combined with its powerful engine, conveying enthusiasm about the car's appeal.
Neutral: @VRV000 provided detailed production data about the 2010 R230 cars, clarifying the unusual model year transition from 2009 to 2011 in the US market. He mentioned that this specific car is part of a limited production group, which adds uniqueness to its value. @CTilley engaged with @VRV000 to obtain more information about production details and was welcomed into a specific community of owners with similar vehicle configurations, showing interest in the sharing of automotive knowledge.
Negative: There were no negative comments present regarding the vehicle or the auction itself. The overall tone of the discussion remained positive, focused on appreciation and curiosity about the vehicle's specifications and history.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle's enhancements and the seller's detailed responses. @GeorgeLyons (The Seller) highlighted the addition of a Corvette rear sway bar, which is seen as a significant handling improvement, and received positive remarks regarding the original teak steering wheel, noting its rarity for the '66 model year. @AlApril praised the seller for consistently presenting beautiful vehicles, while @Woodland66 remarked on the overall quality, calling it a very nice car despite mentioning small technical details.
Neutral: Several observations focused on technical aspects and requests for clarification. @CraigPriest asked about the addition of the rear sway bar, and @jimlee007 requested photos to verify the installation. @AnnietheFannie raised a question regarding a potential issue with the control arm, which was promptly addressed by @GeorgeLyons (The Seller) with reassurance about its condition. Queries about operational elements like the A/C and the power antenna were also asked, reflecting a desire for thorough knowledge of the vehicle's functionality.
Negative: A few comments expressed concerns or noted changes that might affect value perceptions. @JohnF1966 pointed out the unfortunate change from red to black in the interior, suggesting a potential dislike among purists. @AnnietheFannie questioned the presence of a crack and weld on a control arm, which prompted clarification from the seller. Additionally, @riggsjr inquired about the original carburetor and whether there were any noticeable blemishes on the car, which could imply hesitation regarding its authenticity and condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, labeling it as a 'beautiful car' and a 'rare find' in excellent condition. @krudmuphin praised its cleanliness and originality, echoing a sentiment shared by @David_in_CT who fondly reminisced about his own positive experience with a T5R. @PurdueNCnagy highlighted the comfort and enjoyment of road trips in these cars. Enthusiasts like @TTG underscored the meticulous details of the T-5R, noting its fully serviced and stock condition, while several others lauded the seller’s dedication to preserving this gem. @ckmack (The Seller) emphasized the car’s rich history and well-cared-for status as a major attraction, noting his long ownership and participation in Volvo events.
Neutral: As for the neutral remarks, several community members inquired about specifics of the car’s condition and provided comments related to their personal experiences with similar models. @850R asked about potential corrosion and the condition of dashboard trims, receiving informative responses regarding minor rust in specific areas and overall maintenance. @Autoboy19 and @JaredR shared their knowledge about common issues like seat recoil, referencing their own experiences with the T-5R and expressing a nonchalant regard for such repairs. The seller, @ckmack, also provided detailed reassurances regarding the vehicle’s performance and recent maintenance work, showing an ongoing commitment to transparency during the auction process.
Negative: While the overall feedback was positive, there were mild concerns raised by a few commenters regarding the vehicle’s maintenance history. @850R specifically inquired about rust and the condition of the brake pads and rotors. However, @ckmack addressed these queries openly, offering detailed knowledge about the car’s condition and assuring potential buyers that minor rust issues were manageable. There were also comments reflecting on the auction's slow start, such as @JaredR noting the auction's pace, hinting at a potential concern that this could affect interest. Overall, while these concerns existed, they were largely addressed by the seller, maintaining a focus on the vehicle's positive aspects.
|
 |
Positive: @RedGriffin62 described the vehicle as beautiful, highlighting its appealing aesthetic. @racer355 (The Seller) expressed enthusiasm about the auction, presenting the 1998 2-Door Tahoe as an exceptional vehicle that is enjoyable to drive, suggesting it allows one to relive past experiences. The seller emphasized their enthusiasm for the vehicle, stating that it is in exceptional condition and ready for the next owner to enjoy. Furthermore, @racer355 indicated the commitment to assist potential buyers with inspections and inquiries, which reflects a dedication to customer service and satisfaction.
Neutral: @dobbaker asked for details regarding the engine replacement and work done to the vehicle, indicating a need for more information from the seller. @racer355 (The Seller) provided a detailed response, explaining that the prior customer had to replace the engine due to cylinder fouling and that the truck has only covered roughly 1000 miles since the new crate motor installation. This response provides clarity for potential bidders regarding the vehicle's condition and maintenance history, while ensuring transparency in the auction process.
Negative: @gauldingr expressed concern about the condition of the vehicle's headlight, noting moisture drops and hazing which could indicate it is failing. This comment suggests a potential issue that may require attention, particularly from a safety standpoint. Such concerns may impact buyer confidence, especially in light of the seller's emphasis on the vehicle's overall condition and readiness for sale.
|
 |
Positive: @ICE_in_my_veins praised the vehicle as a great example, highlighting the Sports Exhaust and full leather interior as standout features. @matt256 echoed this sentiment by noting its suitability for real drivers and complimenting the DME, despite minor reservations about the engine bay detail. @campodf expressed a strong desire to bid on the vehicle due to the captivating exhaust sound, while @Segura911 found the car so appealing that they felt relieved not to have pursued a different model. @SwissMovement and @ICE_in_my_veins also commented on the allure of the Speed Yellow color, enhancing the vehicle's desirability.
Neutral: Comments on the listing included inquiries about the vehicle's features and condition. @sdmjake asked about the black script on the sides being vinyl, while @AMCNJ sought clarification on a report regarding "minor damage". The seller, @911r, provided details about a light parking lot bump on the rear bumper, confirming that it involved only a respray with no other damage. Additionally, @Yvr911 requested access to an internal pre-purchase inspection, indicating ongoing interest in the vehicle's condition and history.
Negative: While the comments were primarily positive, there were some indications of concern. @matt256 expressed a mild discontent regarding the engine bay detail, implying it might detract from the vehicle's overall appeal. Additionally, concerns were raised by @Segura911 about the minor damage and the desire for more information, including a thorough technician's report. Questions about the vehicle's original head unit functionality and details on potential aftermarket systems were also posed, hinting at a degree of skepticism from potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Moparmadness expresses appreciation for the vehicle's aggressive look with its 'mean' stance and meaty tires. The sentiment of excitement around the auction is shared by others, including @onebadrover, who is drawn to the idea of a vintage friend for their new Mach 1. @mmacke (The Seller) clarifies that the vehicle has been running well since its rebuild and has only driven a short distance, ensuring that it remains reliable for potential buyers while acknowledging areas for improvement.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Boss302Fan and @gwn, point out specific observations about the vehicle's condition. They note concerns with the missing air cleaner, non-functional gauges, and possibly serious bodywork issues that could affect the long-term functionality of the car. @mmacke (The Seller) provides clarification regarding the air cleaner situation, stating that it comes with one but isn't currently installed due to clearance issues and acknowledges the car has been repainted but with no new information about the level of prep work done. He emphasizes the reliability of the car and highlights the areas needing attention while encouraging thorough inspections by potential buyers.
Negative: Commentators like @Jwolfangk and @shelbymann70 raise alarms over noticeable paint issues, potential filler, and poor aftermarket parts, indicating that it may not hold true value as a 428 CJ without significant restoration work. @69GT350CS echoes similar sentiments, identifying flaws within the vehicle, from sagging headliners to poor patches on the floor pans, arguing that the current auction bid seems too high based on its condition. @Gopher428 even questions whether the engine components are as advertised, noting discrepancies in its casting that could affect its authenticity, which raises further suspicions about the car's overall value.
|
 |
Positive: @Rorin67 praises the vehicle's condition, mentioning it is practically in showroom condition aside from some expected Pennsylvania bug chips. @TommyC expresses enthusiasm for the car's features, appreciating its right color, mileage, and engaging manual transmission, while @Valiantjim highlights its uniqueness, comparing it to legendary cars that ought to be seen in person. @Skidog214, who owns a similar model, emphasizes the smoothness of the engine and the vehicle's iconic styling, wishing the new owner as much enjoyment as he has experienced.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics, the seller, provides context about the vehicle's sale history, indicating it was sold to a previous owner who found it impractical, leading to its return. @sportiva seeks clarification on the car's ownership and title situation. Multiple users express interest in learning more about the car's specifications and whether it features premium audio and any interior wear.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the vehicle's sale history and ownership confusion, with @AnyOldIron and @FordGuy01 expressing confusion about the timeline of events. @sportiva notes the abrupt change in ownership and addresses the need for transparency regarding the prior sale's circumstances. Additionally, @newknees questions the vehicle's interior quality, particularly the leather.
|
 |
Positive: @Ssteimer praised the vehicle, expressing a desire for more garage space to accommodate it. @Sebastian-007 found it nice and believes it will turn heads, while @bpatch (The Seller) highlighted that the car is unique and beautiful, perfect for someone special who wants a show-stopper. Other commenters such as @E70Ev and @Evmoorenw appreciated the car's modified slammed style, suggesting it transformed a potentially boring car into something exciting. @Searle804 shared a nostalgic connection to the low rider culture, admiring the vehicle's potential under the boulevard lights, alluding to shared memories of vibrant car culture.
Neutral: @jbsadler sought clarification regarding the AC system and functionality of the dashboard indicators, showing interest in the history of the Cadillac, especially regarding its connection to Mexico. @bpatch (The Seller) responded, confirming the functionality of the lights and noting no historical records of the car being in Mexico. @2caddiesandaMach1 provided insights on the versatility of an air ride suspension, explaining its capability to adjust to stock height and beyond. The conversation among commenters fluctuated between curiosity about the car's specifications and its features, revealing a collective intrigue about the vehicle's modifications and functionality.
Negative: @cruzahome lamented that a rare Seville was modified into a low rider, reflecting a sentiment of sadness over the lost originality. Others voiced similar concerns about the vehicle's modifications, with some questioning if an LS swap would change the perception towards the car. @jbsadler raised various technical questions about the vehicle's modifications, such as the absence of an AC system and the reason behind a spring on the brake pedal. The comments hinted at a tension between appreciation for unique customization and a desire for classic integrity, illustrating the divide in opinions about the vehicle's modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @rzuchowicz expressed admiration for the vehicle, wishing to connect with its new owner and enjoy the experience of riding along the picturesque Pacific Coast Highway. @XK120SE91 also praised the car, noting the extensive upgrades and modifications that enhance the driving experience for long tours. @Schmoop47 remarked on the car's appealing features, including the presence of rear spring gaiters, indicating a well-maintained condition. The seller, @FantasyJunction, highlighted various enhancements including a 5-speed transmission, electric power steering, and a comprehensive engine rebuild, culminating in over $70,000 worth of improvements that boost the car's driveability and reliability.
Neutral: The listing has been corrected to clarify that the car has steel wheels instead of wire wheels, thanks to the observation made by @Jagken. @FantasyJunction confirmed the car can be inspected in person or through a Pre-Purchase Inspection (PPI) at their showroom in Emeryville, CA. The seller provided detailed information about the extensive service history, modifications, and enhancements made over the years, ensuring that potential buyers are informed about the vehicle's condition before bidding.
Negative: @Jagken pointed out an inconsistency in the listing regarding the car's wheels, which could lead to confusion for potential buyers. Despite the many positive remarks, there seems to be a slight concern regarding the clarity in the vehicle's listing information, as indicated by the need for corrections. Additionally, @FantasyJunction noted the importance of clear communication throughout the auction process to address any potential questions from bidders.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its stunning appearance and original condition. @Sumguy. mentioned the great color, while @Ngsd101 and @Tripledigit highlighted the car's beauty and rare specifications. Several users like @Frida praised the car’s patina, describing it as an honest vehicle that has been well maintained, and @GDogg emphasized the excellence of the detailing. @P-carfan shared fond memories of a similar model, appreciating its legacy, and @70SATMan celebrated the car’s impressive history with previous owners, underscoring its desirability. Overall, there is a clear enthusiasm and respect for this Porsche 911E among the community.
Neutral: The seller, @perray, provided detailed information about the vehicle's history, mentioning its unrestored condition and the single repaint. The car reportedly has no rust and has been well-kept, maintained by a known local mechanic before being sold. @henning raised several questions, including concerns about the door handles and matching numbers, to which the seller provided clarifications. Additionally, comments from users like @d4nsch3r inquired about the functionality of various electrical components, demonstrating an interest in the car's operational integrity.
Negative: Some negative observations were made regarding specific issues with the 911E's condition. @jrw911sc pointed out concerns about oil leaks and the necessity of knowing more about the engine’s seals and components. @ebrand mentioned a minor dash crack that is often seen in older models, implying it is not a major issue but nonetheless detracting from perfection. While not overly critical, these comments reflect a cautious view among potential buyers regarding some aspects of the car's maintenance and condition despite its overall appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @NiceRumble expresses a strong admiration for the vehicle, calling it "drop dead gorgeous" and noting a particular fondness for LBCs in British Racing Green (BRG). This highlights the aesthetic appeal of the car and suggests it has a design that resonates positively with enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Mgrandy54, the seller, acknowledges the concerns raised by others but maintains that the vehicle still drives and handles well. This response suggests that, despite some issues, the car has functional qualities that may still appeal to potential buyers.
Negative: @Spicey raises a significant concern about the vehicle having only 859 miles on it, questioning whether it should be returned to the rebuilder or if a refund should be requested. @Evan-Manning further probes the issue by questioning the low compression in the engine so soon after a rebuild, hinting at possible bad workmanship or other underlying problems.
|
 |
Positive: @sperlz appreciates the uniqueness of the vehicle, noting that it is a lot to take in yet loves seeing such distinctive designs. @boaboyoz describes the custom GMC 370 pickup as very cool and expresses enthusiasm for its custom features. @bondgraham adds that the rig is badass and compliments its color while suggesting a few improvements for comfort with bucket seats in the cab. @UGW agrees with @GSX223 that the truck is cool and highlights its potential use as a functional vehicle, while playfully providing suggestions for enhancements.
Neutral: @motoexoticastl (The Seller) expresses gratitude for the bids and comments received on the one-of-a-kind 1956 GMC Low Cab Pickup, emphasizing their willingness to assist potential buyers with transport options. They mention adding more photos for further review, indicating an effort to engage with interested parties as the auction nears its end. The comments indicate ongoing interest in the vehicle, alongside technical suggestions for aesthetic and functional improvements from the community.
Negative: @GSX223 acknowledges the challenge of mounting a large vintage truck cab on a standard frame and believes the effort is commendable but suggests some structural changes for better proportions. @wizardking1023 mentions that he would be more inclined to bid if the vehicle had an automatic transmission and bucket seats, indicating a potential drawback for some interested buyers. Overall, there are hints that while the vehicle is appealing, certain existing features might deter some bidders from engaging in the auction.
|
 |
Positive: The comments show great enthusiasm for the Morgan Super 3, especially highlighting the unique experience it offers compared to traditional vehicles. The seller, GCEA, emphasizes the fun and comfort of riding it, comparing it favorably to a motorcycle. Many bidders express excitement about the auction, with GCEA engaging positively with bidders and providing additional details, such as photos and videos, to clarify features like heated seats. The sense of urgency in the comments signals keen interest in the bidding process, presenting the vehicle as a rare opportunity.
Neutral: Comments also reveal a mix of information exchange and clarification among users. @Lorenzoo questions the significance of the owl logo, prompting @LongDucDong to point out the explanation provided in the advertisement. This exchange reflects a typical back-and-forth that can sometimes occur in auctions, where potential buyers seek to understand the product better. The seller remains accommodating, inviting questions and sharing content like walkaround videos without getting defensive. The overall atmosphere is friendly, even if some comments include mild irritation.
Negative: On the downside, there are hints of frustration in the comments, particularly from @Lorenzoo, who may have felt dismissed by @LongDucDong's response. Additionally, @crockey makes a lighthearted critique about the choice of photo location, indicating some dissatisfaction with the presentation. The comments reveal that while overall interest in the auction is high, there are still users who are vocal about their expectations or reservations regarding the sale's presentation and communication.
|
 |
Positive: @ttadriver complimented the car's beauty and noted a particular fondness for the slick top, while @Z3SpdDmn expressed admiration for the leather option, calling it rare and enhancing the car's premium feel. @matt376 (The Seller) shared their nostalgia for the Fiero GT since their youth and emphasized the car's low mileage and pristine condition. They hope to find a buyer who will either cherish it or enjoy it without guilt, indicating their attachment and care for the vehicle.
Neutral: @matt376 (The Seller) provided context regarding a professional refinishing of the passenger door after minor scratches were incurred during a project, showcasing attention to detail and maintenance. They also addressed concerns about the coolant temperature gauge, explaining it was a common issue with an easy fix, and he was willing to share more information if potential buyers were interested. Comments from @30thSS383 inquired about suspension components, demonstrating interest in the car's maintenance history.
Negative: @thefleshrocket pointed out a missed opportunity with the car's color choice, suggesting that red over tan would have been a more appealing combination. There were no direct negative comments about the vehicle itself, but the concerns shared about the door refinishing and gauge issues could imply a bit of skepticism regarding the car's condition. Overall, while the feedback was largely positive or neutral, there were hints of criticism that could be perceived as undermining the car's appeal.
|
|
|