Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are generally impressed with the vehicle, highlighting its stunning color combination and overall quality. @3_pedal_guy called it a 'gorgeous spec' while @gdspc praised Mazda for offering such a fantastic color. @zcarguyinohio noted the joy of owning this model and expressed confidence that the future owner will love the car. @davemx5 described it as 'stunning' in person, with several commenters noting the rarity of this special edition, contributing to its desirability.
Neutral: Many comments included factual information about the vehicle’s production numbers and some historical context. @bbreon and @99aeguy discussed the production limits of this model, noting how the 35th Anniversary edition was limited to 350 units in the U.S. and 1,000 worldwide. @kmharrop and @gdspc shared their opinions on the car's aesthetics and color choices, without providing strong opinions either way, focusing on the craftsmanship of the vehicle and the preferences of past models.
Negative: @Sailorknot raised a question about why the seller, @DJT1958, was selling the car, which brought attention to potential concerns about its condition or desirability. @davemx5 expressed a bit of disappointment regarding the color choice, suggesting it could have been brighter or more flashy like earlier editions. @BrokenAdam mentioned missing photos of specific features, implying that the gallery wasn’t fully representative of the car, which could deter some potential buyers.
 |
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a unique project and a neat example of a race car. @Tom_S. highlighted it as the coolest race car they have seen recently, while @gracilism and @CKKurtz mentioned its potential transformation into an off-road racer and as a great entry point into real racing, respectively. Other users, such as @billmagness, shared nostalgic memories linked to the Formula Vee cars, adding a personal touch to the conversation around the vehicle's charm and history. @barnfind57 praised its solid construction and competitive edge, indicating that the car is built well and has the right components for racing fun at a reasonable cost.
Neutral: Discussion around the vehicle also included information about its specifications and requirements for racing eligibility. @gareyg noted the distinction between the C-4 and Z5 designations and mentioned the need for log books for racing participation. The seller, @radsales, clarified that the car had never been raced and thus lacked such documentation. This prompted questions about the viability of the car in current competitions, which led to further commentary about the conditions needed for historic racing, as brought up by @40fordlover and @JBird57, who mentioned compliance with vintage regulations.
Negative: However, some concerns were raised regarding potential shortcomings and the car's current condition. @40fordlover expressed skepticism about its competitiveness in modern SCCA racing without a racing history or logbook, and also questioned why the engine had not run in so long. @KBaird noted signs that the car may have sat outside for an extended period. Additionally, @JBird57 highlighted that modifications made for modern racing may require reversal to comply with vintage regulations, signaling that current investments may surpass resale value. Overall, while the excitement for the project was palpable, potential buyers should be aware of the challenges in getting the vehicle up to competitive standards.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the car's original condition and mechanical reliability, with @fastdaddy noting significant recent maintenance such as new tires, shocks, and seals. The listing describes the vehicle as a 'survivor car,' showcasing its well-preserved original paint and interior. Buyers expressed appreciation for the extensive documentation accompanying the car, including service records, original owner’s manual, and Ziebart rust-proofing paperwork. Comments from users like @Z282slo highlighted the comfortable driving experience the Grand National offers, noting it as a great highway cruiser. Enthusiasts reminisced about the iconic status of the Grand National, with multiple users sharing their nostalgia for the vehicle.
Neutral: Some discussions revolved around specific details of the car, such as inquiries about the T-tops and their sealing, along with thoughts on replacement parts like tie rods and idler arms despite the low mileage. @2quik6 and @WranglerX raised questions about the vehicle's maintenance history and previous ownership, which @fastdaddy addressed transparently by providing prior ownership details and confirmation that the T-tops function well. The dialogue also touched upon various modifications and parts replacement suggestions, such as the fuel pump, which was noted as good preventative maintenance but currently functioning well. Overall, user engagement reflected curiosity about the technical specifications and restoration of the car.
Negative: Some comments noted potential concerns about the vehicle, particularly regarding the intermittent hard brake pedal mentioned by @fastdaddy, who highlighted the unique Power Master brake system's peculiarities. @LeonVaughan questioned the accuracy of the speedometer after observing discrepancies in a driving video. Additionally, @2quik6's concern about the need for tie rod replacement on the low-mileage car hinted at possible underlying issues, despite the overall favorable impression of the vehicle. Furthermore, issues like the passenger sun visor needing attention and the original bumper fillers potentially being a concern for buyers were mentioned, although these were seen as minor flaws in an otherwise appealing vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's unique blend of vintage Ford and modern Mazda engineering, highlighting its reliability and performance. @Gary_T1 points out the joy of using it for holiday parades, while @Tom_S. praises the vehicle's homage to the longstanding Ford/Mazda connection. @Good_Home notes the rare Mazda engine conversion, remarking on the car's beauty and craftsmanship. @BangersMash finds the combination of a 100-year-old car with a 50-year-old drivetrain appealing, suggesting it would provide a fun driving experience. Overall, the sentiment is one of excitement and nostalgia for this restomod.
Neutral: A few commenters sought clarifications from @Chriswizman about specific vehicle features and mechanical details. @Celticcross raised questions about the 1912 emblem and the missing oil pan bolt, while @Red99 inquired about the two-barrel carburetor and the engine's mileage prior to installation. @earlebird asked about the top speed capability given the lack of a speedometer, leading to informative responses from the seller. Comments also mention the ease of handling and no stuttering in the transmission, which suggests that the vehicle is straightforward to drive.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's mechanical condition and modifications. @johntsmith pointed out what appeared to be a leaking master cylinder, asking if it had been addressed. Another commentator, @MarsRover, questioned the setup of a circuit board within the vehicle, indicating they found it unusual. While these comments reflect valid concerns about the vehicle's maintenance and modifications, the seller seems to have responded promptly and transparently, addressing these points to assure potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's condition and aesthetic. @Herder praised the color combination and detail-oriented approach, wishing the seller luck with the sale. @EA71 noted the car's excellent condition, detailing its engine and parts, while @groceg shared a nostalgic experience of driving their TR6, highlighting its performance and the beauty of night drives. @Dr.T and @MartiniC echoed similar sentiments about the appealing color and overall quality, while @Jaybird_57 remarked on the vehicle appearing well-maintained and worthy of a higher auction price. @Pistol_Pete complemented the seller on the car's beauty and mentioned their own project vehicle, while @BringURcashDj shared fond memories associated with the TR6, evoking a sense of nostalgia.
Neutral: The seller, @DLRAZ, provided informative responses about the vehicle's features and history. They confirmed the car's rust-free status, its excellent mechanical condition, and the updates made over time, such as the newer fuse box and relay installations. @DLRAZ also mentioned that the car originally came with a hardtop and shared details about its participation in a local car show, where it received a Best in Class Trophy. The seller expressed a genuine willingness to answer questions throughout the auction, emphasizing their transparency and availability for potential buyers.
Negative: There were few negative comments, primarily focused on inquiries rather than criticisms. @Roncall23 questioned the reason for selling the car, prompting @DLRAZ to explain they had acquired another vehicle and lacked garage space. Additionally, @cjmadura reminisced about their own less fortunate experience with a previous TR6, describing it as a 'rust bucket', which might reflect concerns about the vintage nature of these cars. However, overall, the feedback remained largely positive regarding the vehicle's status and appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the overall aesthetics and quality of the bike restoration, noting its classic appeal. @Crofolks highlighted the '70s Honda vibes and the excellent job of restoration, showing keen interest in the project. @BrokenArrow85 described it as a 'classic beauty' and expressed desire to see it in motion, while @malloryross appreciated the bike's size and modifications, deeming it suitable for riders of all experience levels. Further, @Beefmaster remarked on the bike's appealing design and the concern-free restoration aspect of the drum brake over traditional disc brake systems.
Neutral: The discussion regarding the drum brake versus disc brake sparked a range of opinions among commenters. @mototroyce1 explained that the drum brake is sufficient for a bike like the CB550, stressing that the vintage design maintains adequate performance without compromising aesthetics. Some commenters acknowledged the trade-offs of using a drum brake, arguing that while it may not meet modern braking standards, its retro value holds merit. @JackRabSlim inquired about the carburetor tuning due to the modified exhaust, indicating the bike may need some fine-tuning for optimal performance but appreciated the overall presentation.
Negative: Conversely, several users criticized the decision to replace the disc brake with a drum brake, arguing it compromises safety and performance. @PhilRoberson noted that modern braking standards have surpassed older technologies, making a drum brake less favorable. @RocknRoll suggested that reinstalling a disc brake could enhance the bike's marketability. @strubes250 voiced concerns over safety, suggesting the bike owner should have opted for the original braking system. Overall, there seems to be a sentiment that while the bike looks fantastic, its safety features could have been improved with better braking technology.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters overwhelmingly praise the vehicle for its exceptional build quality and reliability. @Dollycat3 describes the 220D as "lovely" and "well cared for," while @Redbaron95 highlights the durability of the OM61x motors, noting they can reach up to 500,000 miles before requiring a rebuild. Many find the car's design to be beautifully simplistic, with @maw06 appreciating its enduring nature and @schigh citing its attractive body style. Additionally, @UncleFred1 expresses satisfaction with the vehicle’s condition, describing it as a "solid, reliable, comfortable, and economical diesel" that exudes confidence, further emphasizing that it appears to have been cherished over the years.
Neutral: Several comments focus on specific details and clarifications regarding the vehicle's history and current state. @Boulderman requests more information on the service records and air conditioning functionality. The seller, @porschesam, addresses these inquiries, confirming that the air conditioning still operates with R12 and mentions plans to post a driving video. There is also a discussion about service records and their readability, with @porschesam promising to provide scans of the service documentation. Other commenters like @JarrodG72 and @srallen share personal connections to the model and express their appreciation, adding a sense of community interest in the car.
Negative: Some concerns are raised regarding the vehicle’s maintenance history and parts used during refurbishment. @OM621 questions the extensive use of non-OEM parts in the recent refurbishments, suggesting this could potentially affect the vehicle's value or performance. @jeffs3820 asks about the reasons behind the engine rebuild and its mileage history, probing into aspects that may raise potential doubts among buyers. Overall, while love for the 220D is evident, these inquiries showcase a cautionary approach from some commenters who seek more transparency regarding its maintenance and upgrades.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors have expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and luxurious features. @mikeyklikesit called it a "Nice truck!" while @dmichaelsalon described it as a "Beautiful truck!" The truck's smooth ride was noted by @djc_hjc2 who emphasized the comfort and luxury during long drives. Additionally, it's mentioned that the truck has a 36-gallon fuel tank, which enhances its usability for longer trips, further contributing to positive feedback about its performance.
Neutral: Several questions about the vehicle's specifications and functionality have been raised, reflecting curiosity rather than criticism. @maw06 requested videos showcasing cold start, drive, and acceleration to better understand the truck's performance. @djc_hjc2 also alluded to the importance of the extended range fuel tank and the impact of mileage on the driving experience. Questions regarding towing capacity were answered by @svilsd with confirmation of an 11,000-pound towing capacity, indicating that potential buyers are considering practical uses for the truck.
Negative: A concern was raised by @Blesseuer regarding the warranty of the supercharger/engine, which may not extend past the original owner, casting doubt on the vehicle's long-term reliability. @R8302 inquired about the truck's ability to pass smog in California, highlighting potential regulatory issues buyers might face. Overall, while the majority of comments are positive or neutral, these inquiries suggest that there are some reservations about the vehicle's long-term ownership implications.
|
 |
Positive: Comments reflect a high level of admiration for the vehicle's transformation and overall aesthetic. @ededed described the car as beautiful, while @PWSchuh noted its significant glow-up, showcasing tasteful restoration work. @CarFoolLane painted a vivid image of the car's historical charm, suggesting it epitomized the elegance of an Italian businessman in the 1960s, further confirmed by @RogerD's praise for the restoration effort which turned the vehicle into a 'labor of love.' Overall, commentators, including @professorgearhead and @TeddyD, celebrated the sophistication and engineering behind the Lancia Flaminia, expressing hopes for its successful sale after expressing their strong appreciation for its legacy.
Neutral: Several commenters shared a blend of appreciation and curiosity about the vehicle's restoration and historical significance. @ekmcmullen reflected on personal memories with an original model and questioned some details regarding upholstery authenticity, prompting informative responses from @autofool (The Seller) regarding the materials used in the restoration. @MarkS contributed thoughts on the car's rarity, emphasizing its luxury and exclusivity, while @JRE inquired about the car's mechanical status and expressed interest in a driving video, which @autofool addressed by specifying the car's operational readiness and previous mechanical work conducted.
Negative: Despite the overall positivity, some comments expressed skepticism about the project's viability and market perception. @RogerD reflected on discouraging past comments concerning the vehicle's previous listing, suggesting that without @autofool's intervention, it might have deteriorated. @William_S pointed out the challenges in garnering recognition for the car's exceptional build quality, highlighting the risk taken by the seller in offering it with no reserve. Additionally, @TheOMDude raised a question about the car's features, implying a lack of clarity or potential confusion about different model variations.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Yamaha bike, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and nostalgic value. @OldGuy referred to it as a "stunning example of one of the best-looking bikes of all time." @SoCal250 complimented it as a "very nice looking and well-done resto-mod R5B," suggesting that it shares a resemblance with another previously sold bike from the same seller. @wannabid55 reminisced fondly about owning a similar model in the 70s, calling it an "absolute BLAST to ride," further emphasizing the bike's charm and appeal among vintage motorcycle enthusiasts.
Neutral: Some comments focused on technical details and inquiries about the bike's specifications and restoration process. @buybid22, who is the seller, mentioned that he planned to provide a running video and confirmed that all components were in working order. Comments from @rofandofy and @1akita1 posed questions regarding the ignition system, engine components, and the functionality of electrical features, indicating a practical interest in the bike's mechanical integrity. Meanwhile, @Randakk shared a nostalgic experience, asking for more information about the engine build and the restoration specifics, though he acknowledged the bike's high quality.
Negative: Concerns about the accuracy of the listing were raised when @bat pointed out an error regarding the model year of the engine, stating that the R5 was only produced from 1970 to 1972. This led to a clarification from the seller that highlighted some confusion over the engine parts sourced from another model. Additional questions asked by @rofandofy and @1akita1 reflect potential worries about the bike's comprehensive condition, including the ignition system and the operation of all gears and electrical components, indicating that some prospective buyers might have reservations about its reliability and performance despite the seller's reassurances.
|
 |
Positive: @IHeartMiatas (The Seller) expresses ownership pride, stating that the S2000 track car has been 100% reliable over the 4.5 years of ownership and mentions it is easy to maintain. The seller notes that the car has produced impressive performance metrics, achieving 217 whp and 153 lb-ft of torque, and recorded a strong track lap time of 1:31.717 at Willow Springs International Raceway with an instructor driving. Commenters like @jeffward25 appreciate the build quality and color, calling it a beautiful vehicle and a fun track toy.
Neutral: The vehicle currently holds California registration but is not smog legal without modifications, including the installation of a catalytic converter. @IHeartMiatas (The Seller) explains that it has a Hondata Flashpro unit for tuning flexibility, which is beneficial for both street and track use. They also confirm that the car maintains everyday functions such as working windows, wipers, air conditioning, and lights, suggesting practicality alongside its racing credentials.
Negative: There are some concerns about the car's repainting, as mentioned by @Cooper585, who questions how the VIN stickers were preserved during the bodywork. @outrunner hints at possible visible signs of previous damage, suggesting that the 'keying' incident noted by the seller may have had a significant impact on the vehicle's history. This has raised questions about the car's past, making potential buyers wary of its condition despite the seller's enthusiasm.
|
 |
Positive: @JakeTheSnake115 remarked that the vehicle is a "Beast of a rig!!" indicating a strong positive impression. @Chriszark appreciates the paint color of the vehicle, expressing love for its aesthetics and showing an interest in bidding for it in the future, although with a preference for a model with additional features. @CB2024, despite mentioning the bumper alignment issue, acknowledges the vehicle's overall attractiveness, noting it as a "nice looking rig."
Neutral: @Idaho_7 inquired about the original factory maximum towing capacity, demonstrating interest in the vehicle's specifications without leaning towards a positive or negative sentiment. @CB2024 also seeks clarification on the alignment issue with the rear bumper, highlighting a concern while maintaining an unbiased tone. @aqhaimpressive asked about the headliner and visor condition, requesting further details on the vehicle's interior.
Negative: @ejwil questioned whether the turbo would pass California smog regulations, hinting at potential issues with compliance. @CB2024 expressed disappointment that the bumper issue had not been corrected before the auction, which can be seen as a negative aspect of the vehicle's presentation. @Byrdj (The Seller) mentioned the bumper was dented and bent, which may deter buyers concerned about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: The 2023 BMW R nineT has garnered a lot of admiration for its stunning design and upgrades. @JGraham commented on the machine's breathtaking appearance, while @NaijaNinja noted its pristine condition. Many users, including @jimmytheirishman and @SteveIOMTT, praised the beauty of the bike, emphasizing its head-turning qualities. The seller, @LewisX, has indicated the pride taken in the customizations, particularly highlighting the performance enhancements with the Akrapovič header and quality upgrades like the Brembo brakes. Enthusiasts appreciate the careful maintenance and the bike's overall performance, contributing to a highly positive vibe in the comments.
Neutral: Several commenters have asked questions and made observations about various aspects of the bike without showing strong opinions. @XRDV8 inquired about the functionality of the HFK front and rear camera system, and @finchy wondered about shipping coordination, showing a practical consideration for potential buyers. @SopwithTriplane sought clarification on whether the paint scheme was factory or custom, reflecting interest in the bike's authenticity. @TexasMule provided technical insights regarding the brake calipers, which further sparked discussion among knowledgeable enthusiasts.
Negative: Despite the overall positivity, @Designartinmotion jokingly referenced personal issues related to bidding on the bike, highlighting that not everyone may be in a position to pursue it due to circumstances like divorce. There was a hint of skepticism from some quarters regarding the bike's past history, as @LewisX acknowledged a prior incident in 2024, noting that all necessary repairs have been professionally addressed without lingering issues. However, this transparency from the seller appears to mitigate concerns rather than exacerbate them.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm for the 1937 Buick, praising its fun driving experience and capabilities. @rgpiatt mentions a desire for dual exhaust, indicating a level of interest in modifying the vehicle. @nettdog71 shares enjoyable experiences from local car shows and highlights the benefits of the modern EFI system over traditional carburetors, reassuring potential buyers about its reliability on the road.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about specific features and mechanical aspects of the car. @ABaron asks whether all original instrumentation functions, while @David_P notes the intriguing nature of having fuel injection on a classic Buick straight eight engine. @nettdog71 responds to these inquiries with detailed information about the gauges and electrical system, confirming that all gauges operate, although he mentions the fuel sender can be erratic at times.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding mechanical aspects like drivetrain seepage. @BigRiveDave inquires about the severity of the seepage, while @ferrous8 wonders about its cruising speed and comfort on highways. @nettdog71 addresses these topics, explaining the nature of the seepage and providing context on the car's operational speed, but some users, like @mike_rockwell, suggest concerns about shipping costs and availability, reflecting hesitance on the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous accolades for its well-preserved condition, as noted by commentors like @sgntpepper78, who expressed admiration for its thorough presentation and authentic background. @4Jandow shared fond memories of how much the car means to them, including the joy it has brought over the years. The appeal of the car, its provenance, and the connection between owner and vehicle is highlighted by several users, suggesting it holds significant sentimental value and historical importance.
Neutral: Commentors raised questions about technical aspects of the vehicle, including its engine rebuild history and smog compliance, which indicate a mix of curiosity and practicality regarding the car’s functionality. @broodie sought clarification on rebuild dates, while @Jaybart provided detailed information about the car's journey and maintenance history. Several users appreciated the transparency about the vehicle's mileage and legal status, suggesting a conscientious approach to car sales.
Negative: Some concerns were expressed regarding the potential for the car to be modified or altered, with @CarFoolLane highlighting a desire for it not to be turned into another 'cookie-cutter restomod.' This sentiment reflects worries about losing the authenticity of such a rare find. Additionally, comments from users like @Mr.Majestyk questioned the implications of brake maintenance, which may hint at a need for further clarity on the condition of the vintage vehicle.
|
6.5L Turbodiesel–Powered 1984 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight Regency Brougham
1G3AH69N6EM732695
Lot 212176
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commenters express great admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive build and historical significance. @johnjm notes the enhanced horsepower compared to the original diesel, while @CarFoolLane appreciates the unique customization that sets it apart from typical models. @S123Driver and @70_duster describe the car as a gorgeous representation of 80s luxury, with @maw06 enjoying the distinct sound of its diesel engine. Overall, commenters applaud the thoughtful upgrades and the vehicle's retro charm, expressing excitement about the auction.
Neutral: Several commenters reflect on their personal experiences with similar diesel models, providing a balanced perspective on the vehicle. @pcchuck recalls a friend's Oldsmobile diesel and mentions some reliability issues, while @MRF shares their experience with an 80 Toronado Diesel, noting both the challenges and the great fuel efficiency. @Electraglider comments on the dedication required for a diesel swap, illustrating the commitment to enhancing performance and maintaining originality, as discussed by the seller, @Storm77.
Negative: However, some critical comments emerge regarding the practicality and maintenance of diesel engines. @mcj4250 asks for performance metrics like MPG and acceleration, hinting at potential concerns about the vehicle's speed and efficiency. @joepontiac63 inquires about the visibility of the turbo, indicating confusion about the engineering. Additionally, @Motts71 shares a cautionary tale about the care needed for diesel engines to avoid problems, which aligns with previous experiences shared by other commenters, showing a mixture of nostalgia and skepticism.
|
 |
Positive: @Rehlers praises the motorcycle's Honda drivetrain as an engineering marvel, while @Chico1 reminisces about their own 1999 Interstate version, emphasizing its suitability for long rides but noting the lack of a reverse gear. @gkvonzyia64 (The Seller) shares a heartfelt history of the bike, highlighting its excellent condition and the care it has received over the years, including a recent service, while inviting potential buyers to ask any questions.
Neutral: @BigEB remarks on the bike's original condition and color, mentioning nice aftermarket additions that enhance it, and acknowledges the power and low mileage as positive attributes. @wever1951 confirms the reliability of the model, citing Goldwing dependability and power. @rofandofy describes the Valkyrie as the coolest power cruiser ever, praising its smooth and reliable engine, with the mileage suggesting it's just nicely broken in, appealing to the rarity of good examples in the market.
Negative: @jim53066 raises a concern about a perceived dent in the gas tank, leading @gkvonzyia64 (The Seller) to clarify that there is no dent, suggesting lighting issues and offering to provide further photos. @gkvonzyia64 also addresses inquiries about tire conditions and the age of the tires, expressing uncertainty about their last replacement but recommending changing them for safety. @Valkyrja expresses hesitation about bidding due to potential confusion in ownership.
|
 |
Positive: @TLG1020 commented on the vehicle, highlighting it as a "beautiful car" and expressing admiration for it. This positive feedback suggests that the vehicle has appealing aesthetics and is well-regarded by at least some potential buyers.
Neutral: @DKeng has made multiple inquiries to @Seller regarding additional details about the vehicle. He requested videos for a cold start and overall condition, including any scuffs or scratches. Furthermore, he noted the absence of Brembo 6 piston calipers, asking for clarification on this detail, which @bringatrailer acknowledged and subsequently updated in the listing.
Negative: @DKeng expressed concerns regarding the vehicle's condition related to the removal of the front license plate bracket, asking for close-ups of the bumper to show any remaining mounting holes. These inquiries signal potential issues or discrepancies in the vehicle's presentation that could affect buyer perception.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect an enthusiasm for the vehicle, especially highlighting its impressive build quality and performance characteristics. @p1_motorcars_ltd, the seller, elaborates on the car's meticulous construction, confirming that all components operate smoothly without any warning lights. Commenters like @Jbtsurf express admiration for the choice of parts and the overall setup, while @Antoniofal inquires about the functionality of the heat and A/C, indicating that living with this car is not a concern. Many commentors, including @Porsche2011, share excitement about driving a car that evokes the feel of rally legend Colin McRae, suggesting that the driving experience is thrilling and enjoyable.
Neutral: Some commenters have expressed curiosity and sought clarification regarding the vehicle's modifications, including its engine specifications and the history of its various VIN numbers. For instance, @quattro_v1.0 and @dubu_jorim engage in discussions about the vehicle's engine and chassis codes, noting discrepancies and seeking validation on the car's conversion from LHD to RHD. Others, like @R2-2U, ponder whether the car has ever been used in competitive settings, showing that while the vehicle is marketed as a tribute car, there are questions about its designed purpose and original intent in relation to performance.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle’s multi-VIN status have surfaced, particularly in relation to registration challenges in areas with strict vehicle inspections. Commenters like @Drew510 caution potential buyers about the complexities that may arise with DMV regulations, highlighting that the vehicle's multiple VINs could lead to confusion during registration processes. Additionally, @Umoa generates apprehension over the feasibility of registering the car in California, where strict emissions laws could pose a significant hurdle. Overall, these concerns suggest that while the car is celebrated for its performance and build, its legality and ease of registration may detract from its appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle's exceptional condition and rare features. @LoudNotFast notes its well-loved status, while @shkayb95 describes it as the ultimate 3rd gen. @Ghosty highlights the low mileage paired with a desirable manual transmission, and @SlowNRusty commends the truck's nearly pristine frame, indicating it likely spent its life in better conditions than expected for a vehicle from Pennsylvania. The unique aspects of the vehicle, particularly its dealer-installed TRD modifications and documentation, are repeatedly acknowledged, giving it a sense of rarity among 4Runners. @matthews_727 claims it's the best 3rd gen they've ever seen.
Neutral: Numerous comments focus on the impressive features of the vehicle, including its factory-installed TRD supercharger, exhaust, headers, and corresponding documentation provided by the original dealer. @Chi_PT inquires about the underside frame's treatment, to which @Youngtimerclassics (The Seller) clarifies it remains untouched and clean. Discussion around the vehicle's future value is common, as several users speculate on its attractiveness to collectors and enthusiasts. @crush and @Youngtimerclassics (The Seller) acknowledge the car's appeal while pointing out the importance of its history and condition, contributing to an expectation of significant interest during the auction.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism regarding the expectation of a high selling price based solely on the vehicle's rare features and low mileage. @carstruck suggests that while the documentation and upgrades add value, they might not translate to a massively inflated price. @shkayb95 raises a concern about the absence of timing belt and water pump service records, indicating potential maintenance issues. Additionally, others, including @FA20FTW, share the sentiment that, despite its impressive condition, the vehicle is perhaps too special to be driven regularly, hinting at apprehension over using such a pristine example for its intended purpose.
|
 |
Positive: @JimAllen shared interesting insights about the vehicle's heritage, noting its status as an Aristocrat special model and mentioning an existing restored version currently available. This highlights the vehicle's uniqueness and potential value among collectors. The reference to the VIN range indicates that it has historical significance tied to its production date in 1969, which could enhance its appeal to enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several users have requested more visual information to better assess the vehicle. @gr33nsc0ut and @mkor are seeking specific pictures and videos of the undercarriage, driveline, and functionality of various components like lights and windows. This suggests that potential buyers are looking for transparency and reassurance regarding the vehicle's condition prior to making a bidding decision.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the vehicle's configuration and parts. @RIDAN inquired about the availability of a hardtop, implying uncertainty about what may come with the purchase. Meanwhile, @Scout_Geek raised questions about potential issues with the pinion angles related to the setup, suggesting that modifications may not be ideally suited and could lead to performance problems.
|
 |
Positive: @Terrierpike expressed a strong emotional attachment to the vehicle, referring to it as their "dream truck" and noting that it evokes nostalgia. They are clearly intrigued by the auction's potential and are curious about how high the bidding will go, indicating a positive sentiment toward both the truck and its value.
Neutral: @ToddZ mentioned that the vehicle was photographed and seen driving near Prescott airport, which suggests an ongoing presence and visibility in the area. The Seller, @10510863, confirmed the truck's running condition and provided additional information about the location, showing a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: There were no negative comments about the vehicle in the provided feedback. However, @missmayhem's question about delivery to Peoria highlights that concerns regarding logistics might exist, even though the Seller assured that delivery to this location is not an issue.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the aesthetic appeal of the 1948 Willys Overland Jeepster, with @GDogg expressing admiration by stating it is a nice looking vehicle and welcoming it back. @Jersey_Joe also praises the Jeepster's appearance and enthusiasm, indicating it would be passed on to a fellow enthusiast, thus reinforcing the vehicle's desirability among collectors and hobbyists. The seller, @Nowdow, agrees with this assessment, mentioning that the Jeepster is a nice example and is hopeful it will be appreciated by a true enthusiast rather than left unused.
Neutral: Throughout the comments, @Nowdow (The Seller) shares detailed information about the vehicle's history and condition. It has been well cared for, never seeing bad weather and not exceeding 45 mph, suggesting it was maintained in prime condition for shows and parades. The Seller includes information about maintenance work that has been done, such as the rebuilt speedometer, new fuel tank, and less than 100 miles on new tires. The inclusion of additional parts and Jeepster memorabilia demonstrates the vehicle's completeness and collector's value.
Negative: However, there are some cons noted, particularly regarding the broken latch on the right side convertible top which although includes a replacement part. This minor flaw could slightly detract from the overall value for some buyers. Despite this issue, @Nowdow reflects a positive outlook for the Jeepster's future ownership and is keen to find someone who will truly value and care for it rather than let it sit unused, indicating a slight disappointment in its current status as a 'Garage Queen.'
|
 |
Positive: @Bmwe12memories expresses a deep appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting the joy it has brought during the short time they have owned it. The modifications made to the car, including the installation of Pepita seat covers and specialized gauges, reflect a personal touch that enhances its appeal. The seller aims to ensure the new owner enjoys the car even more, indicating a desire to pass it on in good faith.
Neutral: The seller provides a detailed account of the vehicle's condition, mentioning aspects such as the slight vibration during highway driving, the brake pulsation at high speeds, and the oil consumption issue, which requires vigilance while driving. They also note some repairs and replacements made, such as new wipers and hood struts, as well as the recent maintenance they performed, like a transmission fluid change. Furthermore, they mention the potential for future repairs, indicating the car's usability while being transparent about its current state.
Negative: @Bmwe12memories does acknowledge several concerns about the vehicle that could deter potential buyers. Issues like visible wheel bends, brake pulsation, and oil burning during operation reveal that the car is not in perfect condition. The mention of a small chip in the windshield and a crack in the driver's armrest suggests cosmetic flaws that might require attention. Additionally, the need for potential future repairs to the wheels and cup holder indicates that this vehicle requires ongoing maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: The comments express a fond nostalgia for the Saab 900 Coupe, particularly in its SPG edition, which is seen as an iconic and highly sought-after vehicle. @dustinnaylor94 (The Seller) reassures potential buyers about the condition of the car, stating there is no rust in critical areas and highlighting its enjoyable driving experience. @martinaricejr suggests that the lack of a working speedometer can be remedied with a GPS device, while @mikewood considers it a good candidate for restoration, wishing the current owner good luck. Several comments indicate enthusiasm for restoring the car, viewing it as a worthwhile project that could bring it back to glory.
Neutral: Some comments raise questions about the vehicle's condition, with @lewtus asking about potential rust and @H58VAH noting the extensive work that would be needed to restore the car to its former glory. @jhutchy26 inquires about the type of clear coat applied, expressing concern over the possibility of water damage. @ns7505 wonders about the car's mechanical reliability for daily use and whether the turbo system has become more dependable by the model year 1990. Overall, the exchange shows curiosity regarding the vehicle's history and the potential challenges a restoration project could present.
Negative: Conversely, there are warnings and criticisms regarding the car's current state. @JIMMY humorously remarks on the likelihood that the car has leaked enough oil to rust-proof itself, while @Tigers196884 emphasizes that comments should remain positive, hinting at the challenges ahead. @H58VAH expresses concern about the complicated nature of restoring such a vehicle, advocating for proper and meticulous work to avoid cutting corners. Various comments suggest that while the car is a compelling restoration candidate, it also poses significant challenges from rust, mechanical work, and cosmetic issues that a future owner must be prepared to tackle.
|
18k-Mile 2008 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Convertible 6-Speed
1ZVHT89S385144988
Lot 212203
Private Party
 |
Positive: @DanShen (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm about the car, highlighting its rarity as one of only 1,550 left from the 2,070 built in 2008. The seller notes the vehicle has only 18,463 original miles, has a striking black on black color scheme, and has always been garaged, emphasizing that it has been a joy to own. The seller maintains that the car has never been tracked and was mostly used for car shows by the original owner, who referred to it as a 'trailer queen.'
Neutral: @secondhole expresses curiosity about how the car was transported from South Carolina to California, although she later clarifies that the car is actually located in Okatie. This indicates that she might have missed some details in the seller's narrative. Other comments include @knotthead asking for a driving video, to which @DanShen responded that the current video was affected by background music, and they plan to make a new one when the weather permits.
Negative: @eaglevision20 comments on a specific issue regarding the car's interior, noting that there is some peeling on the driver's door and inquires about any additional wear or its cause. @DanShen acknowledges the peeling as being the only spot of concern and suggests it should be an easy fix, showing a willingness to address potential issues but also highlighting a minor flaw in the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @BlueBimmers praised the vehicle for its beautiful design and well-executed interior modifications, noting the quality of the work done. @Westopher commented positively about the owner's long-term relationship with the car, emphasizing that a vehicle with such continual ownership and use tends to inspire confidence among potential buyers. @twulff (The Seller) expressed pride in the vehicle's maintenance, clearly stating that it has served them well over the years and rejecting the notion that it is simply a show car, highlighting its robustness as a driver’s car.
Neutral: @twulff (The Seller) addressed concerns regarding the fog lights being uninstalled by explaining personal preference about their appearance. They also detailed the history of the vehicle, including its maintenance and emissions test history, clarifying that any previous test failures were resolved and the car has passed consistently during their ownership. Various commentors, such as @rpibabson02, requested clarification on mechanical components, such as the wheels and tensioners, which @twulff answered thoroughly, providing additional context about the upkeep of the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's past accidents and the subsequent repairs carried out, with @ThejudgeRoy directly questioning the lack of pictures relating to the vehicle's accident history. Commentators such as @rpibabson02 pointed out discrepancies in the mileage shown on the Carfax, prompting @twulff (The Seller) to confirm the actual mileage and the causes behind emissions failures, which had been the result of an exhaust leak. @SJBOTT specifically inquired about the implications of the salvage title, which @twulff clarified does not exist, as damage was classified as minor following inspections.
|
 |
Positive: @spsteele noted that it's a Nice truck!, while @KatManDew expressed excitement about the vehicle's condition, emphasizing its beauty and classic nature. @Rknut48262 confirmed the truck's authenticity and condition, expressing a strong desire to own it and likening it to a time capsule. @nsab appreciated the originality of the pickup, stating it's refreshing to see a well-maintained vehicle, while also verifying that it should drive well on a long distance trip.
Neutral: @AllenHeeren (The Seller) answered inquiries about the truck’s history, clarifying that the original factory paint remains intact without any repaints, and that only the bumper was replaced after a minor accident in 1987. He provided assurance about the vehicle's original mileage of just under 16,000 and confirmed that it has never been smoked in with no signs of mouse damage. He also mentioned other details like fresh fuel in the tank and the air conditioning functioning properly with R-12.
Negative: @KY-lake raised concerns over the CARFAX report's description of the accident as "moderate," questioning why it would note such if the damage was minor. @Jcharles69 expressed frustration wishing a different truck was chosen by the seller's uncle instead. @TANATS questioned a potential discrepancy in paint quality, suggesting there might be touch-ups that were not disclosed, while @CRUSH directly asked about the accident damage, indicating a need for more details.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is highly regarded for its rarity and unique features. @mynameistimo and @johnjm express delight in the inclusion of a Deluxe Marti report, highlighting the importance of the 5-speed manual transmission option in the 1986 Ford Aerostar Cargo Van. Many commenters, including @robbiefarmer and @89lincolntc, appreciate the stick shift aspect, emphasizing its coolness and the nostalgia it brings. @EstateSale finds the van appealing, noting its blue interior and cargo layout, while also suggesting it could be creatively repurposed as a work van or micro camper. The seller, @Styop554, points out that the van’s survival rate is very low, making it a significant collector's item.
Neutral: Commenters observe the vehicle's condition and previous ownership history with interest. @fka_ray mentions the van's past as typically being used for work, raising curiosity about its backstory. @NorCalBert shares observations about its life in a coastal area, which likely helped preserve its condition. The seller provides reassurances about the tires and the van's overall state, addressing concerns from potential buyers like @MELLO47 regarding safety for a long drive. Overall, the conversation reflects a mixture of nostalgia and curiosity about the van's past and current state, as discussed by fans and collectors alike.
Negative: There are concerns about certain features and the van's condition that some commenters raise. @spacetiger and @Becauseracecar both express disappointment at the lack of air conditioning, with @spacetiger dramatically wondering aloud about its absence. Issues like the alignment of the front fender and painted components are noted by @FoMoCoPower, while @logger01 questions potential rust damage. @azjd raises a question about a rust spot at the windshield, although the seller reassures that it has not resulted in any water damage inside. These critiques indicate awareness and caution among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the car's overall condition and the effort the seller, @anthonyrzhkv, has put into maintaining it. Many commenters, like @cj11 and @E28E34, compliment the seller for bringing the E34 back into good operating condition, highlighting its impressive preservation despite its age. The car is noted for its beautiful engine sound and the well-maintained leather interior, which is rare for older BMWs. Overall, the enthusiasm expressed by potential buyers shows that there is considerable interest in this classic model, particularly among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Some commenters have inquiries regarding minor details about the car, such as the nature of a previous damage report and specific concerns about the corrosion on the doors. @falcone1312 and @notredame05 express their desire to see additional photos detailing the areas in question, indicating that potential buyers are attentive and want to ensure the car meets their standards. This indicates that while the car is well-presented, there are still questions regarding its history and condition that buyers want to confirm before making a purchase.
Negative: While there are mostly positive comments, @E28E34 brings up some points of concern regarding the car's condition, noting minor imperfections such as a spill/drip on the hood and sagging headliner, which reflect typical issues for vehicles of this age. Additionally, @LuisU. raises a practical concern about whether the vehicle will meet California's smog check requirements, which could be a deterrent for some potential buyers living in areas with strict emissions regulations.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight the impressive restoration work that has been showcased by @Ifrew, who provided a link to a YouTube playlist detailing the process. Many users expressed nostalgia, with @bruno1boy complimenting the presentation and stating it brought him back to 1978. @Alaskastang fondly recalled his time with the same bike in 1979, emphasizing the great memories associated with it. @AustinDemo62 pointed out the rarity of finding such a well-preserved model, indicating the high value placed on vehicles like this one.
Neutral: Some users shared personal stories related to the bike without expressing strong positive or negative sentiments. @GLWT and @PRoss both mentioned their experiences of owning similar bikes in the past, along with @otcviper recalling his high school memories. @stone reminisced about owning a dirt-only model, wishing the bike was closer to him, while others reflected on their college and high school experiences with similar vehicles from the 1980s, creating a sense of shared history among the commenters.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments regarding the vehicle, as most responses leaned towards nostalgia and fond memories. However, @stone expressed a slight disappointment by wishing the bike was closer to him, which could suggest a missed opportunity to engage with the vehicle more directly. Overall, the comments largely remained supportive and nostalgic, reflecting positively on the vehicle despite the absence of any major critiques.
|
Original-Owner 2002 Ford F-250 Super Duty XLT Crew Cab Power Stroke 4×4
1FTNW21F92ED10334
Lot 212224
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commentors express appreciation for the vehicle's maintenance and care. @brohrbach (The Seller) emphasizes that the truck has been well taken care of, always kept in heated garages, and has not been a daily driver. @jma256 notes the nice attention to service records, further indicating the vehicle's good condition. @CB2024 shares enthusiasm for the seller's smoking policy, highlighting that the interior remains pristine and smoke-free, which adds to the appeal of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several questions arise regarding the truck's history and usage. @HuntBuck7 inquires about the condition of a cold start video and its historical usage, while @HSKinsley suggests a specific test for engine health called a blow-by test. @brohrbach (The Seller) answers the questions, providing details about the truck's usage with light towing and confirming no issues with starting, but noting that the vehicle was always sheltered. The comment also includes updates about uploaded videos and additional pictures, showcasing transparency in communication.
Negative: Some frustrations are evident in the comments regarding communication delays. @HuntBuck7 expresses concern over not receiving timely responses to inquiries about the truck, leading to repeated questions about the auction process. Although @brohrbach (The Seller) apologizes for the delay, the repeated inquiries may indicate that potential buyers are feeling a bit neglected and seek prompt engagement on their queries for a smoother purchasing experience.
|
 |
Positive: @Britnic777 reminisces about the E21 323i, highlighting its exotic appeal with twin exhaust outlets and expressing admiration for the 143HP it produced, noting the car's allure in the UK market. @SlowNRusty praises the design by Paul Bracq and reflects on the car's significance during its era, celebrating its blend of size and performance suitable for European roads. @LUC_DC fondly recalls the experience of driving the 323i, describing it as a thrilling machine while also ensuring potential buyers are aware of its spirited handling characteristics.
Neutral: @brigadooner comments on the car's condition, acknowledging that it is a desirable Euro model but mentions previous storage issues that may have affected its integrity. @argosy, the seller, mentions a lack of time to restore the vehicle and expresses hope that a new owner will take on the project. @MCrock engages with the community by asking for clarification on a picture of the car, while @David_P responds with helpful information regarding the trunk area.
Negative: @brigadooner notes concerns about rust around the windshield and the impact of prior outdoor storage, suggesting it may have contributed to the car's current condition. @okie_flats warns that the rust issues around the windows could complicate the overall restoration process. Additionally, @LUC_DC emphasizes caution when driving on wet roads due to the car's performance characteristics, indicating it may not be ideal for all drivers.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg described the DB11 Coupe as fantastic, and @Vision complimented its beauty by calling it a gorgeous car. Additionally, @993Enthusiast shared their extensive history of high-value vehicle purchases, praising the seller and noting that the car had received impeccable care and maintenance. The seller, @JelloInCa, also contributed positively by detailing the various inspections and warranties that the car has undergone, assuring potential buyers of its excellent condition.
Neutral: The seller, @JelloInCa, answered multiple inquiries regarding the vehicle's service history and condition, confirming that the 30k service had been completed and all service records were available. The seller clarified that the minor damage reported occurred prior to their ownership and that the car has undergone inspections at multiple service centers with no issues found. Additionally, @Tjames4987 questioned the airbag replacement guidelines, to which @JelloInCa explained the standards for vehicles manufactured after the mid-2000s.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about possible cosmetic issues. @SeanMTX pointed out what appeared to be overspray or burn damage in a picture, which @JelloInCa later determined was simply dirt that was easily wiped off. @LonghornForever inquired about damage estimates from the Aston Martin dealership, and @Jeffglen mentioned a potential "smudge" on the emblem, raising doubts about it being a repaint. Despite these inquiries, @JelloInCa assured that all concerns were addressed and clarified any misconceptions.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlighted the appealing aspects of the vehicle, noting its well-preserved condition and nostalgic value. @Beans_Bacon praised the seller for providing a strong opening bid, while @Rob_M1 expressed admiration for the vehicle's color. @BeetleBailey63 referred to it as a beautiful project, indicating a sense of excitement around its restoration potential. @ICTGOAT described it as a 'gold mine' and a time capsule, suggesting that the car holds significant historical value. Other commenters appreciated the originality of the car, with @Rivnut emphasizing its solid structure and unique color combination, reinforcing the vehicle's desirability.
Neutral: Comments varied in their inquiries and observations. @nicegarage asked if the engine had been tested to see if it turns, reflecting a common concern among potential buyers regarding the car's mechanical state. @mike_rockwell made a comment about the rarity of such finds, leading to a discussion about the car's funded history and original parts. @treetrimmer inquired about the possibility of inspecting the car during the auction, highlighting the practical aspect of buying a vintage vehicle. The seller, @isolovers, engaged with multiple buyers through comments, providing further details about the car's condition and documentation, fostering a sense of community and transparency.
Negative: Some comments pointed to concerns about the vehicle's condition or the auction process. @BeetleBailey63 raised doubts about the engine's originality in relation to the VIN, indicating potential discrepancies that could affect the car's value. @hr47cars expressed skepticism about the seller's lack of clarity regarding the engine's operational condition, hinting at the uncertainty buyers might feel without a definitive statement. Additionally, @rickaz voiced a cautious perspective regarding the seller's reputation, underscoring a concern that the car might not be as immaculate as presented. Overall, these comments reflect a mix of cautious curiosity and critical inquiry from potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @AlsoACarGuy (The Seller) highlights that this Bronco has undergone major mechanical refreshes, making it a reliable daily driver. The upgrades, which include a Holset Super HX30 turbo, larger intercooler, and new injectors, significantly boost the vehicle's horsepower and torque. Additionally, @AlsoACarGuy emphasizes the comfort improvements made, including extensive sound-deadening and a custom sound system, indicating the vehicle is not only powerful but pleasurable to drive.
Neutral: Commenters like @Dct302 and @Onlyfords inquire about the vehicle's fuel efficiency and highway performance, expressing general interest in the Bronco's capabilities. @MontanaBroncos reminisces about their own Bronco experience while @carstruck acknowledges the impressive specifications without any critique. @jhall026 shows interest in unique features, asking about the custom steps under the passenger door, which @AlsoACarGuy confirms are sturdy additions focusing on aesthetics and functionality.
Negative: @Markerolo raises a question regarding the smog legality of the Bronco in California, a potential concern for buyers in that state. @lsdude asks about the air conditioning system's fixability, which implies there might be issues that need addressing, but @AlsoACarGuy assures that repairs are possible. Overall, while most comments are favorable or neutral, there's a slight undercurrent of concern regarding regulations and the need for further repairs.
|
 |
Positive: @mwallaced compliments the vehicle's color, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @2manytoyss expresses his admiration for the Tribute's design, particularly noting the 911 style cooling on the 912 motor. @Axam86 (The Seller) notes that the third cylinder's compression retest was 118psi, showing a good level of performance. Additionally, @Axam86 reassures potential buyers that all instruments and lights function normally, addressing concerns about the car's condition with transparency and assurance.
Neutral: @band-aid inquires about the vehicle's registration status in California, while @F1DR1VR seeks confirmation about current registration due to previous concerns with back registration. @Axam86 (The Seller) confirms that the car is registered in California with a clean title and has current tags that expire in 2026. Queries about the car's rubber components and pictures are raised by @ghozt06, to which @Axam86 responds with availability of pictures showing the wheel wells and suspension.
Negative: Concerns are raised by @snerd regarding the vehicle's classification as a 1971 VW instead of a California Special Construction. @Randym1100 points out the absence of heater boxes, questioning the vehicle's heating capabilities, which @Axam86 admits is correct, indicating that the vehicle lacks a heater. Such issues might deter buyers looking for a more conventional setup.
|
 |
Positive: @Barryward expresses excitement about bidding on the DeLorean, emphasizing a fun and lighthearted encouragement not to be deterred. @82DMC12 offers to assist with a pre-purchase inspection, leveraging their extensive experience as a DeLorean owner, which showcases a community willing to support potential buyers. Additionally, @Rholcomb (The Seller) shares a driving video to demonstrate the vehicle's functionality, along with unique items included in the sale, enhancing the overall value proposition of the car.
Neutral: Several comments indicate an interest in gathering more information about the vehicle's condition. @DeLoreanTech asks the seller about potential driving videos, showing interest in seeing the car in action. @Autolockerie raises important questions about the maintenance history, specifically regarding the fuel pump and conditions under the car, while also requesting additional photos to assess issues like battery leakage and brake fluid leaks. These queries demonstrate a cautious but inquisitive approach from potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the overall condition of the DeLorean. @jsloden notes the presence of original fuel lines, urging immediate replacement due to potential risks. @Autolockerie points out visible damage to the passenger side carpet, inquiring about several issues that could affect the car's performance, including the brake master cylinder and the alternator's maintenance history. These comments highlight a degree of skepticism regarding the car's current state and the need for thorough inspection.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the 1956 Lincoln Continental Mark II highlight its stunning beauty and timeless style. @GDogg appreciates the overall appeal, confidently predicting it's going to be a good watch. @Dollycat3 describes it as 'absolutely superb,' noting its elegant color combination and remarkable presence, which other commenters like @1996MBZ and @slickmick also recognize as iconic. Many express admiration for its hand-built quality and unique design, evident from remarks about its distinct interior and exterior aesthetics, with commenters keen on its craftsmanship and history.
Neutral: Several discussions touch on the car's specific features and historical context without strong opinions expressed. @pragmatic raises questions about the original colors of the vehicle, prompting insights from others regarding potential color codes and factory options. @CPT_Morgan provided information on the car's production history, highlighting it as an introductory unit before clarifying the lack of A/C in certain climates. Commenters also discuss the specifics of the window designs and minor repairs that have been made.
Negative: Some commenters raise concerns regarding the vehicle's authenticity, particularly regarding changes made to its interior. @Gregpryckman expresses disappointment over the use of vinyl instead of original leather, while @pragmatic notes a broken side window, questioning its original design. Additionally, @RepoRob clarifies a common misconception about the Mark II's branding, highlighting that they were separate from Lincoln as a standalone brand, which some may find misleading. On the whole, there are mixed feelings about any alterations made to the car that might detract from its original charm.
|
 |
Positive: Comments from @CaprockClassics and @RumbleAuto highlight the car's fantastic condition and impressive example status, with @CaprockClassics even predicting it might break the BaT record for a low-mile 240SX. Enthusiasts like @240SX-T and @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 express a desire to preserve the vehicle in its stock form, appreciating its current state and urging future buyers to maintain its originality. @LongDucDong humorously suggests placing the car in a museum to protect it from potential modifications or damage.
Neutral: Several commentors, including @Forrester59 and @mav1178, have posed questions about specific features and modifications of the vehicle, such as the management of the shoulder belt and past exhaust replacement history. @mdonovan79 (The Seller) provides informative answers regarding the automatic seatbelt mechanism and the original owner's choices related to the exhaust system. Meanwhile, @skylinekin inquires about the availability of original keys and manuals, indicating potential buyer interest in complete documentation.
Negative: On the other hand, users like @tommyfyeah and @LVBrendon mention their plans or desires to modify the car significantly, which may concern those favoring its preservation. @Enpy expresses a worry that the vehicle could either be maintained as a stock gem or damaged shortly after acquisition, reflecting a split concern about the future of this classic. Additionally, the critical comments from @daddsun and others suggest a need for immediate care and replacements to ensure the car lasts, given its age and potential issues.
|
 |
Positive: @Slam105 comments on the rarity and fun experience of riding the Moto Morini, highlighting its appeal as a unique bike. @Robson425 has a positive experience with this model, claiming it offers the best brakes, good power, and great handling among the Giro era bikes. He also notes that the current auction price is a bargain. @ilikevelos appreciates that the shifter design accommodates larger shoe sizes, indicating a thoughtful design approach in its manufacturing.
Neutral: @Noble2 inquires about the title requirements for vehicles in Connecticut, seeking clarity on how ownership is documented. @Rudernst questions the description 'five speed odometer,' prompting interaction from @GeneTerenzio (The Seller), who clarifies it as a misprint regarding the mileage reading on the speedometer. @Kasindy shares their experience with North Hollywood Speedometer for speedometer restoration, indicating a resource for others looking to maintain their vehicles.
Negative: @ukguy admires the beauty of the Morini but is discouraged by the shipping costs, feeling it lessens the bike's financial appeal. Such logistical concerns could deter potential buyers. The comments reflect logistical and ownership concerns that may affect the selling process and buyer interest.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, particularly highlighting its graphics and tint. @Gmmuscleusa stated that they love the graphics and described the truck as very sharp looking, indicating overall satisfaction with its appearance. Additionally, @jma256 complimented the stellar look of the truck and appreciated the graphics, suggesting a positive reception from potential buyers.
Neutral: Inquiring commenters sought specific information regarding the vehicle's features and condition. @whitesquare asked about what appeared to be an aftermarket turbo setup, indicating a curiosity about the vehicle's performance enhancements. @ALattuca inquired about potential leaks, while @Autocar62 was concerned about signs of rust, pointing to a desire for transparency regarding the truck's condition. @Elite_WindowTinting (The Seller) provided detailed responses, confirming the absence of rust and outlining the specifications of the window tint applied to the vehicle.
Negative: There were some concerns raised related to vehicle specifics, particularly about potential leaks as noted by @ALattuca. @Autocar62's inquiry about rust also reflects a concern that could impact a buyer's decision. While @Gmmuscleusa and @jma256 praised the vehicle, the inquiries from other commenters highlight that for some potential buyers, the condition and modifications of the truck remain pivotal points of concern.
|
 |
Positive: @truthseeker commented positively, describing the vehicle as a 'Sweet Chevelle.' @Spencer71 also expressed a favorable opinion, stating it looks like a good ride. The seller, @Voski90, noted that the car drives very well, indicating that it performs reliably. Additionally, @Tgtully thanked the seller for providing photos and information, suggesting that the responses were helpful and appreciated.
Neutral: @KarKenKens explained their low opening bid as a placeholder and included a humorous comment about auction minimums, while @Barryward mentioned the color issue related to their Malibu ownership. Several users, including @val1550 and @Tgtully, asked for additional photos of the vehicle, indicating a desire for more detailed information to aid in their decision-making. @Voski90 assured users that more pictures would be added and offered to arrange inspections if necessary, reflecting an accommodating and communicative approach from the seller.
Negative: @Barryward questioned the lack of pictures of the floors and under the doors, expressing disappointment in the absence of these details. @val1550 reiterated the concern and emphasized the need for clear images of the floor pans instead of just carpet, suggesting that previous responses did not fully address their inquiry. @Voski90 acknowledged challenges in providing the requested images of the floors, mentioning unable to find older pictures and offering alternative inspection options, highlighting a potential lack of completeness in the listing.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's beauty and desirability. @gunaagaar praises the car, wishing the seller a great sale, while @mjk923 and @RenegadeRoller echo these sentiments, highlighting how the car looks even better in person than in photographs. @JakeTheSnake115 and @Britnic777 reminisce about the Jaguar brand, stating their appreciation for the aesthetics of this model, indicating a sense of nostalgia and appreciation for the high standards set by Jaguar in the past. The vehicle's low mileage of 3,200 miles also draws positive attention, with many perceiving it as a high-quality offering.
Neutral: Several comments address inquiries and concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and specifications. @Ksdaoski27 asks about maintenance records, and @WHS54 seeks clarification about the cooling pipes and maintenance documentation. The seller, @GDMCHRIZ, interjects to provide factual information regarding the vehicle's maintenance, confirming that all services are documented on Carfax and that a recent inspection was completed without any issues. There is also a discussion about the tires and their date codes, along with questions about the car's history in terms of location and transport, which @GDMCHRIZ answers to clarify the situation.
Negative: However, not all comments are positive, as there are concerns about the vehicle's condition. @TexasMule points out the alarming appearance of the front rotors, questioning if it indicates neglect. @Bobcat0814 reinforces this worry, suggesting the rotors exhibit excessive wear. Various users express skepticism regarding the original components, suspecting the vehicle may have been tracked despite its low mileage. Additionally, @Allan1cars mentions their own experiences with Jaguar vehicles and highlights potential issues with parts durability. These critical remarks show that while the vehicle may have aesthetic appeal, there are underlying concerns about its mechanical condition.
|
22-Years-Owned 1978 Chevrolet Corvette 25th Anniversary Edition L82 5-Speed
1Z8748S408649
Lot 212233
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, appreciating its classic allure and uniqueness, especially since it features a 5-speed conversion, which is uncommon for a Corvette. @thehunt notably emphasized their love for the car and inquired about specific details regarding the heads installed. Additionally, @dukmon commended the car and expressed a desire to see further video evidence of its performance, indicating enthusiasm among potential buyers. @GTO2XS and others showed interest in its past performance and history, indicating this vehicle's positive reception among car enthusiasts.
Neutral: The seller, @67comet26, engaged actively with commenters, providing information and responding to inquiries about smog tests, modifications, and technical details regarding the car. This included discussions about the paperwork of the engine and transmission work, along with uploads of various requested photos, such as the birdcage. While some commenters asked for specific images of the car’s underside and detailed photos of certain components, the answered queries generally reflected a willingness to share information without making strong judgments about the condition or desirability of the vehicle.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the car’s condition, with isolated mentions of possible frame damage brought up by @GTO2XS and questions about rust issues in the body. @mike6613 commented on strange sounds in the driving videos, which the seller addressed by clarifying that it was due to the car's garage door opener. Additionally, @blindwayne expressed uncertainty about the A/C performance, to which the seller suggested potential issues with the fan motor. While these criticisms did not overshadow the overall positive sentiment, they highlighted the importance of transparency regarding the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Barryward remarks on the vehicle's appearance, calling it a "beauty," indicating a strong appreciation for its aesthetic. @AutoAppraise (The Seller) also reassures potential buyers about the vehicle's engine and transmission, describing the 350 engine as a crate engine that runs very nicely without hesitation or lag. This level of detail and positive experience from the extensive test drive likely enhances buyer confidence.
Neutral: @Chuck6060 inquires about the accessibility of the rumble seat, mentioning that a step on the right rear fender is missing, which could potentially be reinstalled. @LW57 asks whether the trunk lid still opens, which suggests an interest in the vehicle's functional features. @ACN968 suggests that the vehicle is a great candidate for a 351C swap, indicating possible modifications that could be considered.
Negative: @griz99005 raises concerns about potential overheating and electrical issues, which could deter some potential buyers worried about reliability. @hiwaydrifter is looking for detailed information on the engine and transmission, hinting at possible skepticism about the vehicle's condition. @LAYoung's comment regarding power tops indicates a misunderstanding about the vehicle's year and features, suggesting that some buyers may have misplaced expectations.
|
 |
Positive: @Barryward praised the mini moke, emphasizing its quality and appeal. @Fiveposter expressed admiration for the vehicle's rarity and condition, noting that it features original parts and is exceptionally clean. @Winguard commented on the well-restored nature of the Moke, appreciating its matching numbers, which add to its value and authenticity. @dr-mini provided additional insights into the MK2's design improvements, reinforcing the notion that this Moke is a well-cared-for example of its kind.
Neutral: @Miniforever, the seller, provided historical context for the Moke, detailing its production phases and technical specifications. They clarified that this model is a 1968 Morris MK2 Moke, which was produced for only a brief period, making it a valuable collector's item. Several comments mentioned the differences between MK1 and MK2 Mokes, indicating a shared interest in the vehicle's lineage and modifications over time.
Negative: @chriswilliams questioned whether this was the same Moke previously sold, implying potential concerns about the vehicle's authenticity or sales practices. @Guido36 corrected the seller regarding the production history, suggesting a possible misconception about the Moke's origins. Additionally, @Stgru inquired about the vehicle's legal status and performance, hinting at potential doubts regarding its usability on the road.
|
 |
Positive: @knowahbe reflects fondly on their past experiences with identical vehicles, emphasizing the fun and joy they bring to drivers. They appreciate the original paint and the appealing two-tone cream color. @TommyBoy66 corroborates this by noting that the truck has been well maintained, adding personal anecdotes about their own similar vehicle that performed reliably for years. Both comments highlight the nostalgic value and driving pleasure associated with these trucks.
Neutral: @Bpgraves (The Seller) engages directly with interested parties, offering detailed responses about the truck's specifications and maintenance history. They emphasize the truck's rarity in its original condition and assure potential buyers about the care taken to maintain its mechanical integrity. The seller remains open to inquiries and mentions the specifics of the truck’s engine replacement and the condition of the seating.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, @Bpgraves (The Seller) clarifies the truck does not have working AC, which could be a point of concern for some buyers. Additionally, there are mentions of the seat covers being difficult to remove and the driver side seat being dirty and torn, which may imply needed repairs. While the truck has many strengths, these factors could affect a buyer's interest.
|
 |
Positive: The comments surrounding the vehicle are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting its pristine condition and beautiful styling. @Cheber1 remarks on the vehicle's cleanliness, calling it 'ridiculously clean,' while @alexg182 praises the color combination and expresses excitement about possibly submitting his own vehicle to the same platform. @boaboyoz refers to it as an 'absolutely fabulous' build, and @velocityCC describes it as 'WOW SICK,' indicating a strong admiration for its appearance. Additional praise from @pilot66, describing it as 'the best looking 78/79 Ranger,' showcases the collective appreciation for the vehicle's design and craftsmanship.
Neutral: A few comments are more neutral in nature, often focusing more on technical details or general observations rather than expressing deep admiration or disappointment. @Moepoe points out that the seating arrangement appears to consist of bucket seats instead of a bench, which seems to be a simple observation rather than a critique. This indicates that while the vehicle is well-received, there are also points of clarification being explored by the commenters. Commenters like @DGB2020 (The Seller) acknowledge the feedback and assure potential buyers of the vehicle's quality, emphasizing the effort put into its restoration without directly engaging in the praise or criticism.
Negative: There are limited negative comments; however, @Molae65 expresses a concern regarding a minor detail, stating that the seller's left foot on the brake gives them stress. This comment, while not outright negative, does suggest some apprehension about safety or handling, hinting that not every aspect may be perfect. Overall, the positive comments greatly overshadow any concerns, indicating that the majority find the vehicle highly appealing.
|
 |
Positive: @OutOfMyElement praises the classic bug's horsepower and reminisces about the split window V-dubs on the road, expressing a personal connection due to the car's age. @SuperGeil calls it a beautiful piece of history, while @bobhailend and @professorgearhead both commend the car's appearance and authenticity, with the latter noting that it must be rare to find a beetle with its original engine. @Shumdit is satisfied to hear that the semaphore turn signals are functional, and @Chrispc enjoys seeing similar vintage VWs in timeless shows like the Rockford Files.
Neutral: Comments from @bt41 (The Seller) provide insights into the vehicle's condition, including its original paint, functional features, and the mechanics of the clock and vent windows. Several users, such as @Zeltweg and @Foothill74, request detailed pictures of specific areas of the car to assess its integrity. @Denniec offers clarifications on features like the vent windows, while @kevincstms inquires about brake specifications, receiving informative responses from the seller about factory distinctions.
Negative: @67typeone raises concerns about the obscured information on the car's birth certificate, questioning the necessity of such measures. @Foothill74 expresses interest in potential restoration costs, hinting at visible dents and damage that might require attention, and @Denniec shares a cautionary tale about the car's durability in adverse weather. @bt41 acknowledges that the car has numerous dents and that it isn't suited for restoration, suggesting owners should enjoy its original condition instead.
|
 |
Positive: @RKPorsche911 (The Seller) expressed that the vehicle is a sweet ride in great condition, exceptionally well maintained, and has been garage kept throughout ownership. The seller encourages potential buyers to seize the opportunity to own a fantastic 911, inviting them to reach out for more information. Additionally, another user, @JSNY, complimented the vehicle, noting its attractive OEM features and extending well wishes for the auction.
Neutral: Several users inquired about specific details regarding the car's components, such as @Parrothead50 and @j393939m asking about the IMS bearing status. The seller acknowledged that the IMS bearing had not been updated, and there were uncertainties regarding other aftermarket parts and the suspension lowering kit's documentation, with @HoosierNole7 requesting more information about the kit. The seller also mentioned accommodating @Clo321's request to have a mechanic evaluate the car, highlighting a willingness to assist potential buyers.
Negative: @RKPorsche911 (The Seller) notified bidders about an engine oil seep issue and a slow air leak in the left rear tire, which had gone unaddressed prior to the auction. Following questions from @Parrothead50 about the seep's location, the seller took the car to a service center for diagnosis and agreed to resolve the issues before completing the sale. Despite assuring potential buyers of the steps taken to rectify these concerns, the initial revelation of these problems may raise skepticism for some bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @OldGoat68 appreciates the aesthetic of the vehicle, complimenting it with 'Party in the front, business in the rear, beautiful The Camino.' @Barryward expresses enthusiasm by mentioning opening a bottle of wine to bid, indicating a festive spirit surrounding the auction. @GCM28 describes it as a 'Nice ride!' showing approval of its overall appeal, while @Carsofflorida (The Seller) has also provided startup and driving videos, aiming to engage and inform potential buyers about the vehicle's performance and features.
Neutral: @WIZZZZ has practical questions regarding the vehicle's specifications, such as the type of rear gear and transmission, as well as concerns about leaks. @BigJimInTexas responds positively by verifying the transmission model as a Turbo 350, while also sharing a personal inclination towards the horse shoe shifter. There's also inquiry from @Enduramax about potential rust in the floorboard and the functionality of the AC system, indicating a desire for thorough maintenance details and reliability confirmation.
Negative: Concerns arise from @Enduramax regarding visible rust in the floorboard, which could imply potential structural issues. The questions posed by @WIZZZZ regarding leaks and operational integrity of various components suggest hesitation about the vehicle's overall condition. While @limegreen396's request for a more authentic video garage experience reflects a need for more transparency in the seller's presentation, it highlights a lack of satisfaction with the current materials provided.
|
 |
Positive: @Andrew_Leeson shared his fond memories and enthusiasm for the vehicle, classifying it as a wonderful car that evokes many happy memories from the past. @Kendin (The Seller) expressed a mix of nostalgia and appreciation for the vehicle, noting how it draws comments wherever it goes and how difficult it is for him to say goodbye while believing the next owner will truly enjoy it. He also highlighted the strength and good handling of the car, suggesting that it has retained its charm and performance over the years.
Neutral: @Odink9 commented positively on the service records of the vehicle, implying that they add to its credibility and reliability. @Kendin (The Seller) confirmed a query regarding the undercarriage pictures taken during servicing, which reassured potential buyers that the car does indeed have a driveshaft despite the initial assumption to the contrary. He also clarified details about the seats being leather sourced from the Classic Alfa store, providing transparency about the vehicle's interior.
Negative: @graymedia raised concerns about the vehicle appearing to be missing a driveshaft, indicating a potential issue with the vehicle's condition that could turn off prospective buyers. Despite @Kendin (The Seller)'s assurances regarding the functionality of the driveshaft after repairs, such concerns can linger in the minds of buyers looking for assurance on the car's mechanical integrity. Overall, there seems to be a mix of positive sentiment toward the nostalgia and appeal of the car contrasted against some worries about its maintenance status.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle's appearance and features. @Airliner1 described the car as a "Nice looking 997! Awesome wheels," indicating a strong appreciation for its design. @porsche12 noted that someone will be enjoying a "really nice Porsche," which reflects the overall sentiment that the vehicle is appealing and well-maintained. Overall, many participants expressed admiration for the car's aesthetic and condition, making it clear that its appearance is a significant positive factor in how it is perceived.
Neutral: Some comments were more informational, seeking clarification on the vehicle's specifications and features. @KevinK inquired about a plastic piece in a specific photo, which the seller clarified is the license plate holder from the Porsche Aero kit bumper. @rocketron raised a question about the trunk louvers to understand their condition, to which the seller responded with details about its prior state. Additionally, @Ken_Bone asked for a driving video, and @jbdev (The Seller) acknowledged that while it's possible, the current weather conditions may not permit it, highlighting the ongoing conversation around the car's features and available media.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding specific conditions. @rocketron questioned the state of the trunk louver, indicating possible damage or wear, while @jbdev (The Seller) assured that the issue did not appear to be the result of excessive heat. There was also speculation about the suspension being modified, with @fdetrana asking for confirmation, but the seller maintained that it remains stock. These inquiries suggest that while the car is generally well-regarded, potential buyers are seeking reassurances about its condition and functionality.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the car's unique color combination and pristine condition, with @Kidsixpack labeling it as 'way cool' and @Crossfit calling it 'beautiful'. @Electraglider noted that the vehicle deserves a premium price due to its excellent condition, while @blconkle appreciated the owner's commitment to maintaining its originality. @Johnnymail1 (The Seller) echoed this sentiment, sharing that the car has never seen winter regulations and was kept in a garage, which further emphasizes its well-maintained status.
Neutral: Discussions among commenters reveal an interest in the vehicle's history and mechanics. @Dsmstealth92 inquired about the completion of the vehicle's timing belt and water pump services, to which @Johnnymail1 (The Seller) confirmed that necessary maintenance has been performed. Comments from @will951 highlighted nostalgic connections to similar vehicles in the past, indicating a shared appreciation for the car's legacy. Additionally, @KarKenKens shared an exhilarating story of driving a similar model at high speeds, shedding light on the car's performance capabilities.
Negative: There were few negative comments regarding the vehicle, but some concerns were raised by @Rustwrench, who observed a potential water stain on the headliner, prompting @Johnnymail1 (The Seller) to clarify that the headliner remains in excellent condition. @Edgar_deanda brought up previous issues with the car's ECM, which was replaced, though @Johnnymail1 reassured potential buyers about its current functionality and the absence of rust or corrosion due to consistent indoor storage.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the positive attributes of the vehicle, emphasizing its status as a well-optioned model in the 8th generation of Accords, particularly the V6 manual version, which is noted for being unique and a pleasure to drive. @tsp159 appreciates it as an excellent cruiser, and @Jerbo echoes this sentiment by noting the car's appealing aesthetics. The discussion also mentions its clean Carfax and one-owner history, which adds to the car's desirability, with @oneday expressing an interest in driving it. @TRAVECK5 (The Seller) confirms the car's enjoyable driving experience and provides insights into its maintenance history, ensuring potential buyers that it was well-cared for since new.
Neutral: The vehicle's features and options are subject to mixed feelings among commenters. @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 expresses disappointment over the lack of a navigation system, indicating that this is a drawback for them. On the other hand, @TRAVECK5 (The Seller) mentions that while the Navi would have been a nice addition, the car can still pair with smartphone navigation systems, suggesting it isn't a full loss. Additionally, several commenters are engaged in discussing the car's condition and maintenance history, particularly the timing belt service, which @pamanis7 inquired about, showcasing an emphasis on the vehicle's upkeep.
Negative: There are some negative undertones with @derel1cte questioning the platform's integrity by comparing it to Facebook Marketplace, indicating a possible dissatisfaction with the purchasing environment or context. This sentiment isn't echoed broadly but hints at a perception of diminishing quality or value in the car buying experience. Overall, while @derel1cte's comment may reflect skepticism, it doesn't detract from the enthusiasm shown by others for this specific vehicle, as seen in the supportive responses from different users.
|
 |
Positive: @SomeDay expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as a 'blast' and wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @bradnpedersen, the seller, also emphasizes there are no issues with the bike, which may boost potential buyers' confidence in its condition.
Neutral: @Multistrada1 questions why the bike is being sold with such low miles, indicating curiosity about its usage history. @Synergy-FL inquires whether the bike has the full Akrapovic exhaust system or the stock one, demonstrating interest in the bike's performance features. @DucatiCOL analyzes the bike's exhaust system, noting that it appears to have the stock exhaust, and @csebern agrees with this assessment.
Negative: No negative comments were made regarding the vehicle, as all feedback remained positive or neutral towards its condition and features.
|
 |
Positive: @FalconFlyer calls the car beautiful and highlights it as a great year for the S8. @Dave.quattro, a previous owner, expresses a strong emotional connection to the vehicle, noting his love for the German engineering and the significant service it has received. @KKixar compliments the car's specifications, mentioning it as one of the best, while @GDogg praises the superb photography of the listing, emphasizing its striking appearance. @nlakind vouches for the seller's meticulous care and integrity, suggesting this is a trustworthy purchase. @GRG1 remarks on the timeless quality of the S8 and appreciates the detailed maintenance records provided by the seller, indicating that the condition is suitable for a reliable daily driver.
Neutral: @cgc154 (The Seller) shares his personal experience with the car, detailing his maintenance regimen and the fact that he used it as a daily driver until the arrival of his child. He notes its cosmetic imperfections, including minor dents and paint issues, but reassures potential buyers by providing thorough service records. @cu52 and @Stephenh27 discuss the car's color, indicating some confusion about the specific hue, while @Koba echoes a common concern related to the vehicle's performance under California emissions regulations. Additionally, @jtenright expresses a positive sentiment about the driving experience in his own S8, suggesting that he would be interested in this one for its driving qualities.
Negative: Despite the generally positive feedback, there are some concerns, particularly regarding potential maintenance issues. @Neilhaig asks about a leak and its implications, to which @cgc154 responds that while there is a "wetness", it is not currently leaking or causing drips. @Koba raises a doubt about the power output after emissions modifications, and similarly, @Scott expresses skepticism about owning a high-mileage vehicle. The seller acknowledges these comments, indicating awareness of the vehicle's issues, and maintains a proactive approach by offering to address any further inquiries. Overall, while the vehicle has many positives, there are necessary considerations for prospective buyers regarding its age and condition.
|
 |
Positive: @pojoandy has noted that the vehicle has excellent sound quality with upgrades that were made, including a powered subwoofer that adds depth to the audio experience. He has shared personal family history with the LS 430, emphasizing his long-standing appreciation for the model, which has been a part of his life since 2008. The seller describes the vehicle as beautiful and has ensured that all maintenance is up to date, highlighting the reliability and care given to the car over the years.
Neutral: @pojoandy mentions that the car has a small cosmetic issue, which has been checked and verified by a trusted local shop as merely cosmetic with no significant damage. He also addressed a previous accident, clarifying the circumstances surrounding it and stating that it did not warrant an insurance claim due to the minor nature of the damage. The odometer is nearing 100,000 miles, which he anticipates will bring excitement to the new owner at the milestone.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Surfing_Monkey regarding the condition of the seats, noting some dark spots that appeared in the listing pictures, suggesting possible wear and tear. While @pojoandy responded that he hadn't attempted to clean or maintain the seats, he acknowledged that he wasn't sure about the spotting due to his vision. Additionally, @kat-man expressed a preference for OEM parts over the Gates timing kit reportedly used by the previous owner, indicating some skepticism about the quality of repairs done on the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters highly praised the condition and specifications of the vehicle. @shkayb95 remarked on its superior specifications as a 2nd generation model with a manual transmission, while @CRUSH highlighted the truck's clean undercarriage and enjoyable three-pedal setup. @SomeDay described the truck as 'just about perfect,' and @OhhNoJerryMan noted the meticulous care it received, which reflected in its impressive overall condition. Additionally, the seller, @EastonBBS, showcased various improvements and maintenance efforts that have been undertaken, which contributed to the positive perceptions of the vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @EastonBBS, provided detailed insights about the truck's history, including previous ownership and maintenance. The truck was originally purchased in Charlotte, NC, and has been stored in a garage, only being used occasionally for towing purposes. Various questions from commenters, such as @rgfulks asking about a lift, were addressed accurately by the seller, who clarified that while the truck features leveled suspension with new shocks, the suspension remains otherwise stock. Other comments, including inquiries about the spare tire and wheel spacers, were also met with informative responses from the seller.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by potential buyers regarding the truck's condition. @mad2carguy questioned whether the frame had been inspected due to past recalls, and while the seller confirmed it had been inspected, they acknowledged the importance of providing documentation. @Pontiacs4evr inquired about a possible crack in the dash, which the seller addressed by pointing out minor issues that were not described as cracks. Additionally, @WIZZZZ questioned the purpose of wheel spacers added to the truck, showcasing some skepticism about the modifications made. Overall, while the comments expressed genuine interest, there were apprehensions and requests for clarifications that reflect a careful consideration of the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @vintage_volvo commented positively about the vehicle, noting it is a good-looking Tbird and that often the first iteration of a new design is the best, particularly highlighting the aesthetics of the 1955 model as being quite pure. They encouraged both the seller and buyer with a wish for good luck on the auction, while suggesting this might be the lowest opening bid ever.
Neutral: @eny (The Seller) shared details about the frame repair work done on the vehicle, explaining that it involved cutting out rust and welding a flat 1/4 steel plate over the entire rail on the driver’s side. In response to questions from @EricRobertson and @FlyPanther, the seller clarified that the door panel is off for new speakers, which is why the window crank may not be visible. The seller also acknowledged the request for frame repair photos but did not confirm additional images were available.
Negative: @RaymondTononi expressed a desire for more detailed close-up pictures of the frame repairs made since the car was purchased, indicating a concern over transparency regarding the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @JavierGarza requested a driving video or start-up footage, suggesting a lack of reassurance about the car's operational status.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed appreciation for the seller's willingness to provide additional information about the vehicle. @dvidersmd (The Seller) was communicative, offering to email service records and suggesting that interested parties contact Inskip Porsche for more detailed maintenance information. This responsiveness is seen as a positive aspect of the seller's engagement and transparency.
Neutral: Some commenters requested further details about the vehicle, such as @06BOM6 asking about the engine mounts and @00aas seeking additional photos of the driver seat bolster. These inquiries indicate an interest in understanding the condition of the car, though they do not imply a negative or positive sentiment towards the vehicle itself.
Negative: A few concerns were raised about the completeness of the service records, with @rhern213 noting the lack of specific information on the Carfax regarding cam variator bolts and transfer case maintenance. The absence of these records could potentially raise doubts about the vehicle's maintenance history and condition, leading to some hesitation among prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed strong enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its impressive features. @Bobhigg81 called it a "great GTS" and inquired about the window sticker, showing genuine interest. @GDogg echoed this sentiment, referring to it as a "fantastic GTS" and appreciating the V8 variant. The seller, @uribemiami, responded positively to all comments, expressing love for the car's sound and ride quality, and provided details about the purchase price and willingness to share more information or photos.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and care, reflecting a neutral stance on the car. @Spotpea and @45series asked similar questions about repairs that occurred at 3400 miles, while @AKM320 inquired whether the car was kept in a garage. @uribemiami handled these questions by offering to provide more details and clarifying that the repairs appeared to be warranty-related without any accidents reported on the Carfax.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments about the vehicle. However, the questions regarding repairs at 3400 miles could imply concern or skepticism among potential buyers about the car's history and reliability. @Spotpea and @45series's repeated inquiries about these repairs reflect a cautious approach, indicating that some may be wary about the vehicle's maintenance despite the seller's reassurances.
|
 |
Positive: @KevMac56 (The Seller) mentions that the vehicle runs great and looks terrific, making it suitable for various purposes. It’s described as capable of being the star of the Christmas parade while also being practical for hauling junk to the dump. Additionally, @AirEngr expresses enthusiasm with a simple, positive remark, calling it a 'Cool truck!'.
Neutral: @Ranchero65 asks a question regarding the vehicle, specifically about the levee being dry. This suggests an interest in the truck's performance in relation to environmental conditions, but does not imply any positive or negative sentiment about the vehicle itself.
Negative: While there are no direct negative comments presented, @KevMac56 (The Seller) acknowledges that it is not a 'garage Queen show car', indicating a recognition that it may not meet all expectations for high-end collector cars. This admission could imply a potential drawback for those looking for a pristine vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: The M6 Convertible auction has generated excitement among potential buyers, particularly with its V10 engine. @clawson9 praised the striking Indianapolis Red color, highlighting that it only looks better over time. The seller, @MPC_Concierge, also emphasizes the joy of driving this vehicle, especially with the convertible top down, and provides assurances about the functional condition of the rear window and roof after recent repairs.
Neutral: Several users are curious about various aspects of the vehicle, with @kadocs and @Sovietstig asking about the tire tread and receiving prompt updates from @MPC_Concierge. @EJWinters3 requested information about the car's horsepower after modifications and other mechanical details, to which the seller replied with estimates and past service details. There is interest in its performance relative to other cars, indicating that it's being considered seriously by potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly its cracked dashboard as noted by @cangm001, and there are indications that the tires are older and may soon need replacement as mentioned by @MPC_Concierge. @rwallace3243 questioned the status of essential maintenance items like IMS bearings and oil tests, reflecting a cautionary stance among potential buyers about the vehicle's long-term reliability and upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: @ChuckH (The Seller) provided comprehensive responses about the vehicle's functionality and features, confirming that all power windows, the antenna, air conditioning, gauges, and dash lights are operational, which adds to the appeal of the car. He highlighted the car's low mileage and emphasized its suitability for leisurely drives, stating that it is a 'great car for Saturday cruising.' Additionally, Chuck mentioned that the car comes with T-top bags and a clear title, enhancing its attractiveness to potential buyers.
Neutral: There was some discussion about the vehicle's features and modifications. @Mikedny inquired about the A/C system, T-top bags, and the original radio, while @BettertoBurnout asked about the headers installed on the car. @Habu2 clarified the details regarding the vehicle's engine specifications, noting it features a factory-rated 403ci V8 engine with Flowmaster exhaust headers. The dialogue highlighted several aspects of the car's components, indicating that the community is engaged in discussing its specifications and potential.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the A/C not blowing cold air, as @ChuckH (The Seller) mentioned it blows cool, suggesting it may need freon. There was also some debate about the headers, with @BettertoBurnout expressing a preference against them and @Habu2 suggesting that originality might be more valuable for a 10th Anniversary model. Overall, these comments reflect some reservations among potential buyers about the vehicle's state and modifications that might affect its authenticity.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express strong admiration for the 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220SE Ponton, highlighting its restoration to the original black color as a particularly wise decision. @Dollycat3 and others appreciate the car's overall aesthetic, praising the uniform black finish and features such as the sunroof. Many comments reflect excitement about the mechanical condition, with @Dollycat3 noting great driving and shifting performance. Overall, the car is described as rare and a joy to drive, with @pacificimport (The Seller) emphasizing its originality and lack of rust. @classicotol echoes these sentiments, indicating that the repainting decision enhances its collectible value.
Neutral: Some commenters provide mixed insights about the 220SE, with @UncleFred1 discussing mechanical aspects while also noting aesthetic choices that could improve the car. The interior color mismatch raises concerns for some, but there is acknowledgment that the restoration work is quality. @Frank_Barrett takes a more critical perspective, emphasizing the importance of authenticity in restoration while still recognizing the car's appeal. @Sparrownaut shares a family anecdote related to the model, conveying a nostalgic connection but not directly endorsing the car's value or features.
Negative: On the downside, a few commenters point out specific flaws and areas for improvement. @Frank_Barrett offers a detailed critique of the vehicle's authenticity, suggesting that some restored parts deviate from the original specifications, which could affect its overall value. Concerns about the car's engine noise during acceleration are raised by @UncleFred1, who calls for fellow experts to weigh in. While these comments are constructive, they also indicate some apprehension regarding the vehicle's complete restoration and authenticity, leading to a somewhat cautious perception of its condition among collectors.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express strong admiration for the vehicle. @Mdreiguy calls it a "stunner," and @Aweh refers to it as a "beautiful example." Enthusiasts including @Baggsz and @sy1616 are equally enthusiastic, with the latter simply saying, "Perfection…..argh, sooooo nice!" The seller, @FlatsixSC, highlights that the car has been meticulously maintained and is seen as one of the last peak naturally aspirated analog BMW experiences. Comments mention the car's low mileage, excellent condition, and the fact that it recently passed California SMOG, affirming its compliance and readiness for new owners.
Neutral: Multiple commenters seek clarification on various aspects of the vehicle, showing interest but not expressing dissatisfaction or urgency. @Wompusdude asks about the car's registration process and states he wants to ensure there are no issues with converting it to California title. @Chillynder inquires whether the car passed its exhaust test and the impact of modifications. @m3eo seeks specifics regarding the vehicle's body condition and wiring concerns, noting it appears to be in excellent condition despite requiring some information. @TheHunter inquires about the maintenance records, specifically oil changes, suggesting a careful approach to potential purchases.
Negative: Concerns arise from several commenters regarding specific issues with the vehicle. @TZK18 raises a valid point about the registration title reflecting kilometers instead of miles, which could complicate DMV processes. @Rrobinson3030 mentions deteriorating rear shock boots, prompting questions about ride quality. Additionally, @Aweh warns that while the tires might need replacement, this is a minor concern compared to the car's beauty. @dedinct questions the practicality of the added cup holders, indicating overall some functional concerns among the otherwise positive sentiments about the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance, highlighting its exceptional beauty. @Barryward called it 'straight as an arrow,' while @boaboyoz described it as 'black over white dynamite' and a 'superb specimen.' Numerous contributors noted the value of color schemes, aligning with @gmmuscleusa's view that the change from Fathom Green to Tuxedo Black significantly enhances the car's appeal. Overall, the consensus is that the Camaro, regardless of its color now, holds a strong aesthetic and desirability among enthusiasts.
Neutral: There were various inquiries regarding the car's specifications and history, with individuals such as @AZdesertcamaro and @DMBurt seeking clarification on factory options like power steering and air conditioning. @METALMANJIM, the seller, provided updates on the vehicle's documentation, including a letter showcasing its history, and was responsive to questions about the car's original components. Comments from @Intimidator04 and others suggested that while the car's condition is favorable, additional documentation—like the partial VIN and engine stamps—would increase buyer confidence.
Negative: On the downside, several commenters expressed concerns regarding the vehicle's status as a genuine Z/28. @ssterry and @funkaholik pointed out the lack of essential documentation that usually accompanies listings of high-value vehicles. @1carnotenough criticized the potential surfacing of the front pad area, suggesting it could affect the vehicle's authenticity. To enhance the auction's credibility, many encouraged @METALMANJIM to provide clearer images and more detailed documentation, indicating some skepticism about the car's provenance.
|
 |
Positive: @Hastyryan highlights the truck's reliable performance, stating that it drives straight and tracks well, even boasting about how it's among the best riding lowered trucks he's experienced. He reassures potential buyers about the overall condition of the vehicle, noting improvements like a complete new painless wire harness installed from tail lights to headlights, enhancing its functionality.
Neutral: @Eagleseye suggested a cold start video for further transparency and indicated some concerns regarding the steering wheel being noticeably off center during test drives. He inquired if the vehicle had been aligned to rule out any possible frame damage, demonstrating a cautious approach towards potential issues without outright condemning the vehicle.
Negative: @Hastyryan acknowledged the alignment issue raised by @Eagleseye but downplayed it by saying that the truck still drives well. However, his admission that it hasn't been aligned yet may raise concerns for potential buyers about the truck's handling and safety, indicating that this might be a point of contention for those focused on thorough inspections before purchasing.
|
 |
Positive: @Leif_in_Calif mentions optimism regarding the value of the Aston Martin DB9, suggesting that its impressive specifications and history warrant a better price than what it's currently facing. @JGF321 (The Seller) reflects on the need to sell this particular DB9 due to space limitations, indicating that it is a cherished weekend car. The seller also engages positively with bidders, expressing gratitude for their participation.
Neutral: Comments regarding the potential repair of the dash upholstery indicate concerns but no definitive answers. @TrailerNoob questions the repairability of this issue and seeks an estimate, highlighting the ongoing concerns about the vehicle's condition. @JGF321 (The Seller) mentions a previous case where similar upholstery issues were addressed, though there is uncertainty about the effectiveness of those repairs.
Negative: There are evident concerns about the car's condition, particularly with the dash upholstery and a broken plastic clip under the dash. @Handsofstone raises specific questions about the safety and integrity of the vehicle, which suggests underlying issues that might deter potential buyers. The comments convey a sense of caution about the car's repair needs and overall state, reflecting a more negative outlook towards its immediate sale.
|
 |
Positive: @Drewjevans5689 (The Seller) emphasized the stunning aesthetics and solid mechanical performance of the vehicle, describing it as a sweet ride that receives compliments everywhere. The car has undergone extensive mechanical restoration, including updates to the HVAC system, transmission servicing, and overhaul of several key systems. With just over 100K miles, its future seems bright, indicating long-term reliability and enjoyment for the new owner.
Neutral: @Drewjevans5689 (The Seller) pointed out some cosmetic imperfections, like the need for attention on the exterior roof paint and the rear bumper cover. Additionally, he clarified that while the suspension is stock, there are signs of normal wear in the shock mounts, which are not urgent but could require replacement in the coming years. The seller has also assured that there are no rust issues and mentioned that the car has a solid mechanical foundation due to prior ownership and extensive work done.
Negative: A few concerns were raised about specific aspects of the car. @Irebld inquired about the flaws in the rear bumper and the wheel spacers, while @DachshundDude99 questioned the existence of rust. Additionally, @lambocandy highlighted potential paint issues on the driver-side quarter panel, although @Drewjevans5689 confirmed it was paint rippling without rust. Overall, while the mechanical condition is highlighted positively, the cosmetic details have not been wholly perfected.
|
 |
Positive: @MediocreAtBest highlights the quality of the closed deck M45 block and the tune from Snail Performance, praising their expert setup and expressing enthusiasm for the flex-fuel system. This comment leads to a strong assurance that the car is a worthwhile bid for anyone in its price range, suggesting that it is a solid investment. @MikeCheck12 (The Seller) agrees, acknowledging the power capabilities of the engine and emphasizing its potential for high performance, which appeals to prospective buyers looking for a well-modified vehicle.
Neutral: @Gsupra93 makes an interesting observation about the closed deck build on a stock location turbo and questions the cleanliness of the engine bay, hinting at the need for aesthetic improvements. They also inquire about the usual rattle noise associated with the ACT clutch, adding an ongoing curiosity about the vehicle's modifications and reliability. This neutral stance showcases an analytical approach, indicating that while the setup has promise, its presentation could impact potential bidder interest.
Negative: Concerns arise from @OptOn, who criticizes the lack of an engine compartment wash, indicating a missed opportunity for visual improvement. @Gsupra93 also expresses skepticism about the vehicle's previous modifications and reliability, implying that there might be underlying issues to address. Lastly, @A318customs questions the vehicle's title status, which adds to the uncertainty regarding the car's history. These comments underscore that despite the car's strong points, there are aspects that may deter buyers, such as cosmetic presentation and the vehicle's past.
|
 |
Positive: @2manym0torcycles (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a great machine that looks just as good in person as in the pictures and runs flawlessly. @drewmarc praises the durability of the vehicle, noting that he has seen similar models with over 175k miles, while @JpRocketship shares his positive experience, emphasizing the performance and low maintenance costs associated with the car. @HelpMeHelpU also highlights the vehicle's value, calling it the best bang for the buck in the Porsche world.
Neutral: @zipster21 is inquiring about a DME report to understand the car's treatment over the years, representing a common concern among potential buyers. @CroMagnon raises questions about the condition of the spark plugs and plastic finish, suggesting additional information could be advantageous, such as more pictures of the underside, and showing interest in the vehicle's maintenance history. @aptwo seeks clarification regarding the installation of an aftermarket head unit, asking if a wiring harness was used, while @Vcdoorco5 provides insights into the implications of using ethanol gasoline in older vehicles, helping inform potential buyers further.
Negative: @zipster21 expresses some level of concern about the lack of a DME report to help assess the vehicle's history, while @CroMagnon's mention of possible issues with the interior plastic signifies lingering doubts about its condition, indicative of concerns buyers may have regarding long-term wear. @drewmarc jokingly acknowledges that many bidders are also eyeing another car, hinting at competition and possible anxiety about securing this vehicle, and @2manym0torcycles admits to having a misfire due to a coil pack issue which raises questions about the car's past mechanical reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the appealing aspects of the Bronco, noting its reliability and performance. @Timzak praises its looks and the durability of Ford drivetrains, while @Millertime1977 admires the manual transmission. @Peacefulbob (The Seller) expresses pride in owning the vehicle, describing it as fun to drive and reliable for long trips. Additionally, the seller shares that extensive work has gone into maintaining and upgrading the Bronco, further reinforcing its value as a dependable option for potential buyers. The seller's enthusiasm and engagement with the community are positively received, with several users wishing him luck with the auction.
Neutral: There is some discussion regarding the model specifications of the Bronco. @Molae65 and others question whether it is an Eddie Bauer model or an XLT, based on the VIN and physical features such as the interior color and door jam tag. @FW_BRONC offers insight into potentially missing factory components that could affect the vehicle's history and suggested modifications. @Peacefulbob (The Seller) acknowledges the uncertainty and confirms some of the vehicle's history, which has led to an informative dialogue among the commenters. Despite some debates about the specifics, there is a general sense of camaraderie in sharing knowledge about the Bronco's details.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism regarding the authenticity of the Bronco's model designation, with @Molae65 asserting that the vehicle is likely not an Eddie Bauer based on paint codes and interior features. @bimmere39m5 supports this view, pointing out discrepancies that suggest the vehicle may be categorized as an XLT or XL instead. Additionally, concerns are raised about a minor driveline vibration experienced with the vehicle, prompting questions and suggestions for troubleshooting from users like @gastone21 and @FW_BRONC. @Peacefulbob (The Seller) tries to address these issues but notes the uncertainty around the vehicle's specifications, which may deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @TheLegacy expresses nostalgia for the vehicle, recalling the interesting old school B4s from their time in Japan, which adds a sense of historical value to the car. @MediocreAtBest appreciates the write-up that accompanies the listing, acknowledging its usefulness by providing links to further information and suggesting popular modifications like the conversion to a single turbo. Overall, these comments highlight a fascination with the car's unique attributes and its potential for customization.
Neutral: @mfrederick85 raises a practical request, asking @seller for video evidence of the car's functionality, which implies a desire for transparency but does not inherently criticize the vehicle. @RMQ333 remarks on the car's interesting aspects, further suggesting curiosity about its timing belt maintenance in a questioning tone. This commentary reflects a mix of intrigue and concern about the car's history without strong emotional investment.
Negative: @GauntMushroom88 points out the lack of engagement from @seller, indicating that it could negatively impact the sale price, while @MediocreAtBest echoes this sentiment by mentioning their own experience of trying to contact the seller without success. @FarqMan expresses skepticism about the availability of parts, suggesting a possible maintenance challenge, and this concern is echoed by @MediocreAtBest, who highlights the DIY aspect of maintenance for this type of vehicle. Such comments illustrate apprehension about the vehicle's accessibility and the seller's responsiveness.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered positive attention, with multiple commenters expressing admiration for its rarity and condition. @GBRBiLL highlighted its appeal, calling it a 'fairly rare beast and nice looking!' and @Moepoe noted that being a 1968 model adds to its desirability. Others, including @Hilux1990 and @GulfCoast, emphasized its significant value, suggesting it can fetch high prices due to its unique features, including the L89 engine option. The seller, @Johnsongaric, validated the authenticity of the tank sticker and provided reassurance about its mechanical condition, mentioning that it has been owned for ten years without overheating issues.
Neutral: Several comments pointed out factual details and sought clarifications about the vehicle's specifications. @round_rock_rob raised issues about the initial listing's accuracy, and @DougR recommended corrections regarding the description of the car's features. The seller has been proactive in addressing such inquiries, confirming that the hardtop and glass are in good shape and providing information about the tires. Commenters also discussed the production numbers and unique aspects of the 1968 model, contributing to a deeper understanding of what makes this Corvette stand out.
Negative: A few commenters raised concerns regarding the vehicle's listing details and condition. @Handsofstone pointed out an error about the carburetors and made additional suggestions for improving the description. @kevinckb6 asked about the hardtop's fit, indicating a desire for clarity on the car's condition. Some questions regarding engine specs and history, including the presence of the AIR system, were left unanswered by the seller, creating small doubts for potential buyers. Overall, while there was excitement about the car, some commenters expressed a demand for more precise information and thorough validation.
|
 |
Positive: @Elrod623 noted that the vehicle is reliable and has served them well throughout the years. Several users commented on its fuel efficiency, mentioning that it performs better on gas than similar models. The overall driving experience was praised, with multiple comments highlighting its comfort and smooth handling, making it a great choice for both city and highway driving.
Neutral: Some users, including @Elrod623, remarked that the vehicle has a decent amount of storage space, which makes it practical for family use. Others noted that while the infotainment system is adequate, it might not have all the latest features that newer models offer. A few commenters mentioned that the maintenance costs have been manageable, but they hinted that some repairs could be expensive depending on where you go for service.
Negative: However, there were criticisms about the vehicle's aging design, with some users feeling that it looks outdated compared to newer models. @Elrod623 received feedback regarding certain mechanical issues that emerged after a few years of ownership, which left some consumers feeling apprehensive about long-term reliability. Additionally, several comments pointed out that the resale value of the vehicle has been lower than expected, making it less appealing for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @SullivanAutoHouse highlights this Ford Hot Rod as an incredibly meticulous build and expresses excitement for bidders. Several commenters, including @MCHammer and @gotchile, praise the vehicle's attention to detail and its aesthetic appeal, indicating it can be a great show car or a versatile vehicle for various enthusiasts. @Gold11 describes it as absolutely gorgeous and expresses interest in adding it to a collection, suggesting it has a broad appeal and can draw attention at shows.
Neutral: Commenters, such as @exigev6 and @DocMGL, seek clarification on the vehicle's functional aspects, like its drivability and top removal process, showing interest in its practicality rather than just its looks. @kerryorr inquires about the presence of windows, while others like @mo8ius note the uniqueness of the vehicle in terms of its title and build, suggesting a mix of curiosity about both the build quality and official descriptions.
Negative: Some feedback raises concerns over practical use versus show quality. @Mercury_Man humorously notes that it seems excessive for its price tag, while @mike_rockwell mentions it appears more suited for show than practical street use, implying that potential bidders need to consider its usability. @DocMGL raises questions regarding top removal, suggesting the process might be cumbersome, and inquiring about additional features like window installation, reflecting hesitance about the vehicle's full utility.
|
 |
Positive: @mef0629 describes the vehicle as "Very Pretty!" and notes that it requires minimal work, while also mentioning the value of the original steering wheel. @Cclason praises the FJ for its classic and classy appearance, suggesting it's well done and wishing the seller success with their auction. @timberframe appreciates the authenticity of the FJ, expressing positive sentiments towards the listing.
Neutral: @pgebauer (The Seller) welcomes interest from potential buyers and invites questions about the FJ40. He informs viewers about the optional A/C components he installed and plans to provide additional items at no extra cost. @mabsma raises practical questions concerning the vehicle's restoration documentation, engine specifics, and operational status of the systems.
Negative: @mef0629 mentions minor issues with the turn signals and hazards, suggesting that these should be addressed but claims they'll be easy to fix. This indicates that while the vehicle is appealing, it is not completely without flaws, which could be a concern for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @PTSchram praised the truck, calling it a "lovely handsome truck" and wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @Jimmyblues1959 remarked on the rarity of finding such a vehicle in good condition, adding a thumbs up for good luck. The Seller, @SVDW, shared a great deal of information about the 1997 Land Rover Defender 90 NAS, expressing joy in ownership and highlighting key features such as its rarity due to the automatic transmission and the excellent overall condition of the paint, despite minor nicks. They conveyed confidence that the next owner would enjoy the vehicle as much as they have.
Neutral: Comments from @Ronnie64 and @Fitzroya asked important questions regarding the condition of the vehicle, specifically about potential rust in the doors and floor pans. In response, @SVDW promised to provide more detailed photographs of the areas in question, showcasing diligence in addressing buyer concerns. Additionally, the Seller mentioned they are not accommodating test drives during the auction but are providing various videos to establish the vehicle's condition, which creates a more engaged dialogue about the truck's features.
Negative: While the comments overall were positive, there was concern from @Fitzroya about potential corrosion due to their own experiences with vehicles from cold climates and rust. Implicitly suggesting that more information on corrosion-prone areas of the Defender would be necessary. Furthermore, @WAGONBOYTD raised queries about the vehicle's history and past maintenance work, with a hint of skepticism regarding repairs done in Vermont, indicating a cautious perspective on the condition of the vehicle despite its visual appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @jamesjones1979 praised the vehicle as absolutely amazing, wishing the seller good luck with the auction (GLWTA). @Cburnsy1 described the Cruiser as great looking and well cared for, inquiring about possible driving or cold start videos. @HerbertPhillips, the seller, provided detailed responses about the vehicle's condition, including its original color and the meticulous repaint that aimed to make it look new, which received positive acknowledgment from several commentators who appreciated the efforts made to maintain the vehicle's quality.
Neutral: @SurfPunk asked what color the vehicle was originally and whether it had been painted due to minor damage, showing an interest in its past. @MattHarrison1230 requested to look over the Cruiser in person and communicated via email with the seller for arrangements. The seller confirmed that they could accommodate such a request, showing willingness to engage with potential buyers and reassure them through additional videos and measurements of the vehicle's paint thickness.
Negative: @Vintagecrusher raised concerns about the extent of rust on the vehicle and the repairs done to the rear after an accident. @bwnolan expressed a request to correct their bid due to a computer glitch, indicating potential confusion in the bidding process. There were also a few comments suggesting uncertainty about the vehicle's history, particularly regarding its condition after an accident, although the seller clarified that there was no significant damage or rust.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's excellent condition and appeal. @seller described it as a 'beautiful spec' while @IBLBCfan recalled fond memories of owning a similar E30, expressing joy in seeing a well-loved car with great presentation. @hobbsm3 praised the attractiveness of the ride, stating, 'You had me at mud flaps!' Additionally, @Capthorod1, the seller, reassured potential buyers of its solid mechanical state and reliability by stating it has no leaks and is fun to drive. He emphasized that the car has been well-maintained and is ready for long-distance driving, encouraging bidders to feel confident in their purchase.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding specific aspects of the vehicle, such as its maintenance history, functionality of features, and potential mechanical concerns. @dimitriparis inquired about the car's timing chain, to which @Capthorod1 responded that it has a timing belt with recent service records. Other users, including @anthonyjp and @Friendly, asked about AC functionality, compression numbers, sunroof operation, and whether the clutch had been serviced. @Slomo633 requested a video to confirm that all warning lights functioned properly, showcasing the buyer's desire for thorough information before bidding.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns regarding potential issues with the vehicle. @dimitriparis specifically voiced worry about rust, asking if the car had been in accidents, while @OttoBob noted a potential issue with the turn signal sound, suggesting that a bulb might be faulty. @dimitriparis also reiterated concerns about rust in multiple follow-ups. @Capthorod1, the seller, addressed these worries, emphasizing that the car is rust-free and in solid condition, but it appears some potential buyers still harbored doubts despite his reassurances.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the vehicle as a "tasty Torch Red F-100", complimenting the build quality with a cheerful "GLWTA!" @MattFarley highlighted the craftsmanship by complimenting the truck as "super nice" and inquiring about the construction of the engine and transmission mounts, reflecting a well-rounded interest in the vehicle's specifications. @edward77 (The Seller) emphasized that this custom F100 is a fun and great driving truck that turns heads everywhere it goes, showcasing it as a daily driver that performs well and attracts positive attention.
Neutral: Commenters such as @Alrawi acknowledged the uniqueness of the truck, asking for specifics regarding its size, dimensions, and the bed's material, which indicates subtle curiosity rather than overt enthusiasm. @edward77 (The Seller) responded with detailed dimensions and the truck's bed lining history, providing additional transparency for potential buyers. @Ab39tonner recalled a similar vehicle from their past, sharing a nostalgic connection while confirming the truck’s appeal and the seller's good luck wishes, further enhancing the neutral feedback on the vehicle's desirability.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the lien status on the vehicle, with @Burnsy007 directly asking about the lien amount, indicating a potential red flag for buyers regarding the truck’s financial obligations. However, @edward77 (The Seller) reassured potential buyers that the transfer of ownership would be smooth, alleviating some concerns. Nonetheless, the existence of a lien could still deter potential buyers who are wary of additional complications in the purchasing process.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its classic aesthetics and overall desirability. @Commander3 mentioned their long-term satisfaction with their own model, describing it as an undervalued gem. @Fore also praised the car's design, calling it one of the most beautiful classic car designs ever. Furthermore, @Seenitdoneitbeenthere shared their positive experience, emphasizing the car's performance, reliability, and the joy it brings them, indicating the car garners attention and compliments wherever they go.
Neutral: Several participants sought more information and details regarding the vehicle, with @t4svet asking for specifics about the digital display's condition. @rexracer2025 and @mkellermeyer also requested additional images and videos to better assess the car's physical condition. @Corpmotorcars, the seller, responded promptly to these inquiries, confirming the digital display is functional despite some distortion and promising further video and photo updates once conditions allowed.
Negative: However, concerns were raised about the car's service history and current condition. @FesterSlamstone pointed out gaps in documented service history and questioned the vehicle's regular usage since 2012. Additionally, @Speedraser cautioned about potential issues with the lifting points used during inspections, which could lead to cosmetic damage. Other commenters, like @NotTellinYou, expressed apprehension regarding the car's price exceeding their budget, indicating a general sense of hesitance among some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle received several compliments about its aesthetic appeal. Commentors like @ghiamanjc noted it as a 'nice looking ride' and highlighted its historical significance by mentioning its place in the 74 Registry. @Frankieballs also referred to it as a 'stunning beauty,' indicating a strong visual impression. @Firthlavitch (The Seller) confirmed that the vehicle's clock is operational, adding to its desirability as an investment. Additionally, the adjustable Mustang seats were mentioned positively, indicating comfort and practicality for potential buyers.
Neutral: There were inquiries about the vehicle's features and functionality, with @dncarrharness requesting videos showing various aspects such as the cold start and driving capability. @AvionicsTech asked about the adjustable nature of the bucket seats, seeking clarity on how they are attached to the floor. Various comments acknowledged the vehicle's modifications, like the EMPI exhaust system, leading to discussions about the heating system's status. @Firthlavitch (The Seller) addressed these questions by explaining the features and confirming the availability of the stock heater system with the car, suggesting a straightforward path for restoration if needed.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's heating capabilities due to the EMPI exhaust system, which seems to omit the heater boxes. @DaveSparks highlighted this issue, seeking clarification on the heater system's functionality. Additionally, @AvionicsTech mentioned that once the shipping and potential restoration costs are factored in, the vehicle's pricing becomes 'prohibitive,' indicating a concern over affordability and value. @Jameade also expressed impatience regarding the promised videos, questioning the reliability of the seller's communication and commitment to providing information.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance, particularly highlighting its beautiful color and overall gorgeous specification. @Gcollector noted the appealing color, and @rkuechler agreed by calling it gorgeous. @Carterrrrrrr and @MontanaOutlaw666 also added positive remarks, appreciating the vehicle and thanking the seller for their responses, signaling a generally favorable impression of the car's aesthetic and initial responses from the seller.
Neutral: Several commenters asked technical questions regarding the vehicle, indicating a desire for more detailed information. @WabiSabi912 requested video evidence of the cold start and driving conditions, while others inquired about specifics like the functionality of the A/C and lockers. @aramsauce (The Seller) responded to these queries comprehensively, albeit acknowledging that certain photos and videos would need to wait until after the auction due to being out of town. This exchange reflects an ongoing dialogue about the car's features and performance while highlighting a collaborative approach between the seller and potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's condition were voiced, particularly about the unresolved AC issues and the presence of rust under the floor mats. @N24 raised multiple critical questions regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, including the transmission replacement and potential leaks, expressing frustration over the seller's initial lack of response. @CaliforniaSwede and others also voiced skepticism about the diff locks and rust treatment, pointing to the need for transparency about repairs and functional aspects of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Spider_Mike highlights the SC430's appeal, suggesting that even widespread critiques from @JeremyClarkson and @JamesMay have ironically increased its value among collectors. He praises its high reliability, luxurious comfort, and a powerful V8 engine, emphasizing that despite space limitations, its overall quality and smooth ride make it desirable for many owners. @Bluegrass502 appreciates the specific model being sold, stating his affinity for the color combo, which further underscores the SC430's aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: @NStevenGray raises several inquiries about the vehicle, including the functionality of the power antenna, clarity of the HVAC control panel, and the presence of dashboard warning lights. The seller, @vmockus, addresses these questions, confirming that the power antenna works, the HVAC control panel is clear despite unclear photos, and there are no warning lights—a reflection of the car's maintained condition. The interaction indicates a proactive approach to buyer concerns, fostering transparency.
Negative: @thedude2 questions the lack of a sticker indicating when the timing belt and water pump were changed, implying potential doubts regarding the vehicle's service history. This skepticism hints at a broader concern for transparency in the vehicle's maintenance records, which could affect buyer trust. The seller's explanations regarding the trusted local shop performing the maintenance aim to alleviate these concerns, though questions about documentation remain.
|
 |
Positive: @PetesPonies described the vehicle as a 'Cool truck!' while @TheClassicConnection echoed the sentiment with a positive remark, stating it was a 'Nice truck' and expressing a desire for it to be closer. @BradEnglehart (The Seller) emphasized the truck's appeal, mentioning that it is a 'beauty' and a 'head turner' due to its powerful 460 engine. Others like @hobohank expressed interest in bidding if it were still in British Columbia, and @wkgabrei1 commented that the truck seems to have it all, emphasizing their wish to own it.
Neutral: Several commenters posed questions seeking clarification regarding its features and history. For instance, @Fordfans inquired about the camper top inclusion, which @BradEnglehart confirmed would come with the truck. Other inquiries revolved around tire sizes, A/C functionality, and the existence of two fuel tanks, all of which were met with detailed responses from the seller. @whiterock brought up the truck's history and potential issues with obtaining a title in the U.S., highlighting a mix of interest and caution from potential buyers.
Negative: On the downside, @ROBSREDFORD raised concerns about the quality of the repaint, implying it may not be up to standard. @Foxy2020 shared a troubling experience from a past purchase, indicating difficulties in obtaining a proper title from Canadian purchases which took a year, reflecting hesitance among buyers due to registration complications. These comments suggest that while there is significant interest in the truck, serious considerations regarding its condition and registration might deter some potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @ArtistFox comments positively on the vehicle's features, highlighting the front bench seat, seat massagers, and OEM navigation, considering it a rare optioned vehicle. @PiRround also appreciates the car's luxury aesthetic, particularly noting the landau top and its well-maintained condition, calling it a nice example of American luxury. @executivemotors804 (The Seller) agrees with @PiRround, describing the vehicle as classy and elegant with a well put together color combination.
Neutral: @ChuckThomas requests to see the back of the aftermarket navigation system and dashboard, while @philusc82 wants confirmation of the functionality of all options as well as any body blemishes. @Teamsters1 inquires whether the aftermarket infotainment system was professionally installed, to which @executivemotors804 responds that it was done by a reputable stereo shop. The seller also mentions the availability of the factory navigation unit and that every option works as intended, with some minor blemishes documented.
Negative: @classicguy57 points out a cracked rear deck brake light lens on the driver’s side and questions whether that will be addressed, given the vehicle's prior inspection status from Virginia. The seller responds that the car has a brand new brake light installed. @Mantua82 critiques the Carfax report, asserting that the vehicle is actually a Luxury III trim, suggesting a discrepancy in the listings. This reflects some confusion around the vehicle’s classification that may concern potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @LoneStar2023 complimented the seller on the bike, indicating a positive first impression. @DBesz, the seller, responded enthusiastically, describing the bike as comfortable and regularly maintained. He highlighted the bike's great running condition with no leaks or functional issues, as well as various upgrades including high-intensity lights. The seller mentioned that he has had multiple Harleys but kept this one due to its exceptional comfort, asserting that it is reliable enough for long-distance rides.
Neutral: The seller answered queries from @LoneStar2023 and @JM6463 regarding specifics about the bike's condition and modifications. He explained that the front fender was custom-fabricated for aesthetic reasons and detailed the significant maintenance performed on the bike including new fuel lines and a complete engine rebuild with minimal mileage since. He also mentioned that while he would be comfortable undertaking a long ride, potential buyers should conduct their own checks for assurance, thereby suggesting a careful approach to purchasing.
Negative: @JM6463 raised concerns about the age and condition of the tires, the battery's replacement status, and the unclear abbreviation "GTR" mentioned in the repair order. These questions hint at potential oversight or underlying issues that could affect the bike's overall reliability and could be points of worry for prospective buyers. Additionally, even though the seller expressed confidence in the bike's readiness, the emphasis on performing personal checks suggests that there may be uncertainties that buyers should be aware of.
|
 |
Positive: @Jrood123 mentioned that the truck has some improvements, specifically the addition of an electronic radiator fan, which suggests that the vehicle has been maintained or upgraded in certain aspects. The emphasis on the "as is" condition from the last buyer could imply it has a history of use without major alterations, potentially appealing to buyers seeking authenticity.
Neutral: @NBAS raised a question regarding the absence of the body plaque that typically contains vital vehicle specifications, such as the VIN and details about the engine, transmission, and paint color. These details are important for verification and transparency in the sale, reflecting the need for potential buyers to have access to all original documentation and identifiers for the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the truck's functionality, specifically by @hharney, who questioned whether it would pass an emissions test, indicating potential regulatory compliance issues. Additionally, @sirjasonwelch inquired about the tow capacity, reflecting doubts about the vehicle's performance capabilities, which could deter buyers looking for a reliable work vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @xjhigg expresses his enthusiasm for early 944s, highlighting the unique driving experience provided by the car's balanced weight distribution and manual steering. He appreciates the 1983 model's performance, indicating that while it may not be the fastest, it delivers exceptional value for money and a fun driving experience. Additional commendation comes from @commute2coffee who notes the distinct and desirable Berber Tweed upholstery as a rare highlight of this model, enhancing the car's appeal. @PiRround echoes this sentiment, asserting that Porsche excelled in the design and driving dynamics of the 944, further backing the notion that this particular car has been well cared for and enjoyed.
Neutral: @xjhigg divulges detailed service history, indicating that the vehicle was well-maintained under the previous owner, a dealership mechanic. He mentions various maintenance performed, including a timing belt change and regular oil changes, which have contributed to the car's current healthy state. He is open to potential buyers arranging a third-party inspection, reflecting a willingness to be transparent about the vehicle’s condition. However, he also clarifies the confusion surrounding the mileage, stating that while the odometer reads 78,000 miles, it has actually rolled over, and the estimated total mileage is closer to 178,200 based on records and previous owner testimony.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the car's inoperative air conditioning system. @jonathan seeks clarification on the cause of the AC issue, and @xjhigg confirms that it is due to a leak in the system, although the exact source is unknown. There have also been comments about visible imperfections such as a cracked dashboard, scratches, and that the car's paint is not entirely original, which some potential buyers might find unappealing. Furthermore, @xjhigg mentions intermittent noise from the driver's side window regulator, which, while still functional, adds another layer of concern regarding the car's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: @BennyFazio expressed appreciation for the car's cherry pearl red color, suggesting that the seats would be an easy fix and noting the accessibility of upholstery shops for repairs. @mkusens, the seller, highlighted the extensive mechanical work done on the vehicle, including an engine-out service that replaced multiple components to ensure it runs perfectly. Additionally, the seller is open to showing the car in person, demonstrating his commitment to transparency and customer service.
Neutral: @mkusens provided a detailed history of the vehicle, indicating that he is the second owner and detailing the car's previous usage, including its life in Connecticut and the subsequent mechanical work performed. He mentioned the condition of the interior aside from the seats and shift knob, and the reasoning behind the leather's deterioration due to cold environments. @mayasupra and @TurboLagIsForeplay exchanged thoughts on the implications of the low mileage and how well the car was maintained when not frequently driven, with some reassurance about the importance of proper storage.
Negative: @ByronLakeway voiced skepticism regarding the condition of the seats for a car with only 42,000 miles, comparing it to his own vehicle with higher mileage and better seat condition. @sdg10313 echoed concern about the seats and noted disappointment regarding overspray on the mufflers from paintwork. @problematics324 asked about the age of the tires and expressed curiosity about the cost of replacing the seats and shift knob, reflecting concerns about the overall maintenance of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @rchaas (The Seller) expresses gratitude to potential buyers and encourages questions, highlighting the vehicle's performance and fun factor. @Bartruff1 endorses the quality of the vehicle, praising the craftsmanship and paintwork, while @GCM28 shares a personal experience, emphasizing the car's excellent handling and power, comparing it favorably to his lifelong experience with Porsches. Furthermore, @rchaas (The Seller) reassures interested bidders about the vehicle's street legality and its readiness for both road and track, validating the ride experience.
Neutral: @rchaas (The Seller) provides details about the vehicle's history, mentioning it was originally built for JPS’s owner, John Steel, and later sold to a dealer in NJ. He offers clarification on technical aspects, such as adjustable fixed bucket seats suitable for taller drivers, explaining their forward and backward adjustment. Additionally, he notes a potential issue regarding the axle clearance near the exhaust but assures that it doesn't affect daily driving conditions and commits to providing further photos for clarity.
Negative: Concerns arise from @Greenspyder regarding the paint color mismatches on the rear of the vehicle, suggesting previous repairs or accidents. @AZspyder questions the close proximity of the rear axle to the exhaust pipe, indicating a possible mechanical issue that could arise during driving. @Maximilous initially expresses confusion over the bidding process, but later realizes it was related to a different car, hinting at some complexity or lack of clarity in the auction setup.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praise @Chillydawg2025's K5 Blazer for its impressive restoration and attention to detail. @adamc69 compliments the vehicle, although he expresses a dislike for the Cowell hood, while also inquiring about the paint code for the crimson red. @Zenk and @4wdmama both appreciate the setup of the rig, mentioning that the 4" lift and 35" tires are an optimal combination, and @4wdmama highlights the thoroughness of the truck's refurbishment, noting that it is packed with desirable options and could fetch a high price. @RMQ333 expresses admiration for the refurbishment done on the Blazer and shows interest in a potential future project.
Neutral: @Chillydawg2025 responds to inquiries and comments about the vehicle, providing specific details like the oil pressure reading of 50 lbs when warmed up and idling, and addressing questions about the paint code while confirming that extra paint will be provided to the new owner too. He acknowledges @Dailyn1's question regarding a floor access point, confirming that it is for the fuel sending unit and explaining further. Additionally, he mentions that the original exhaust manifolds and A/C components will come with the truck.
Negative: Some criticism is directed towards the truck's A/C system. @Flyboy4418a points out that the original write-up claimed a functioning air-conditioned cabin, but he notes that several components are missing from the A/C system, which was a significant oversight during the refurbishment. This prompted an update from @bringatrailer to clarify the listing regarding the A/C status.
|
 |
Positive: @xDLXSFx expressed admiration for the aesthetics of the F10 design, particularly noting that it looks even better with a manual transmission. @timdm3 (The Seller) thanked bidders and shared his personal connection to the car, highlighting its reliability as a family vehicle and the prior owner's efforts to preserve the manual tradition after engine issues. He praised the new engine, detailing its flawless performance and recent upgrades that future-proof the car for more horsepower, while maintaining a stock appearance aside from minor updates like the steering wheel and infotainment system.
Neutral: @Matty5125 complimented the car's specification and inquired about previously noted issues with the driver's seat and rear noise, as well as oil weight recommendations. @timdm3 (The Seller) responded indicating his satisfaction with the car, explaining his oil maintenance routine and reaffirming his experience with the current oil weight, while addressing the absence of any noises from the seat or rear, based on his meticulous inspection.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive remarks about the car, @Matty5125 raised concerns regarding unresolved issues from the previous owner about the driver's seat and potential noise. @timdm3 (The Seller) acknowledged those comments but reiterated that he has not encountered any such issues during his ownership. The user @clawson9 also reflected on the rarity of manual cars and speculated on BMW's future direction regarding manual transmissions in their M models, subtly hinting at a desire for the return of such features.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's build quality and features. @2002WS6 praised the traditional design of the truck, highlighting its naturally aspirated engine and lack of modern complications. @Rel_Wood also admired the unique digital dash, stating it added to the truck's appeal. Additionally, @Pathfinder1806 described it as a nicely optioned S-10, recalling their experience with previous models and noting that this particular one stands out as exceptionally nice. The overall sentiment points to a strong appreciation for the vehicle's characteristics and condition.
Neutral: Comments included inquiries about vehicle specifics and clarifications from the seller, @Lizjochum. @PAGSDIII701 asked about the mileage, to which @Lizjochum confirmed it was around 44,000 miles. There were also discussions about the concerns raised by @wantsatruck regarding the illuminated service engine light, which @Lizjochum addressed, stating it was due to the key position during photography and not an engine issue. @dieselworld suggested a mileage verification service, indicating that transparency in mileage could enhance the truck's sellability.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters brought up potential concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @jayman401 raised questions about any known overheating issues, which were addressed by the seller with assurance that there were none. @mitch1212 shared past experiences with rust issues that commonly affect similar models, warning to keep critical areas clean and dry. Additionally, @YouAintLowTrucks pointed out inconsistencies in the wheels mentioned in the listing, indicating misinformation that could detract from the vehicle's perceived credibility.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, praising its outstanding features and quality of the build. @austinoski called it an "amazing car" and noted the tempting nature of the vehicle as if the universe is sending signals. Others like @anyglenwilldo highlighted the uniqueness of the build and wished it good luck in selling. @SlowNRusty remarked on the love invested into the car, stating it should be driven until the end of life, which reflects the passion a true gearhead has for such a classic car. Additionally, several praises focused on the modifications, such as the proper routing of the engine air intake and the careful selection of features like e34 power seats, making it a well-rounded restoration.
Neutral: Some comments reflect a more reserved or analytical view of the vehicle, with inquiries about specific features and modifications. @Eagle1 asked about the rear seatbelt availability, while @BJSHAFER inquired whether the clock was replaced with a digital version. @David_P expressed an opinion about the back seat upholstery being disappointing compared to the rest of the interior but noted that this could be fixed. There was also a discussion around the benefits of the front bumper spoiler, highlighting different preferences within the community between aesthetics and functional performance, with @Bavariakid and @Broovy sharing differing opinions on its presence.
Negative: On the flip side, there were critical comments regarding certain design choices, such as the front bumper spoiler. @jonhoch71 openly questioned the aesthetic justification for such modifications, reflecting a sentiment shared by @Bavariakid, who noted that this aspect ruins the look of these classic cars. @Britnic777 also mentioned the smoked tail-lights as a flaw, even though it was viewed as an easy fix. Additionally, @David_P mentioned dissatisfaction with the back seat upholstery, indicating that it didn't match the quality of the rest of the vehicle, which may lead some potential buyers to have reservations. Overall, while the car has many accolades, some aesthetic choices are divisive among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Barryward mentions that it may be the nicest 51 under the sun, showcasing high regard for the vehicle's condition. @a410traveler expresses a nostalgic appreciation for the vehicle, having liked it during a previous auction. @ssclassic reflects positively on the heritage and integrity of the car, reminiscing about his own experiences with similar models and praising the preservation efforts of such vehicles.
Neutral: @RickK asks about the hood stripes, whether they are paint or removable vinyl, indicating curiosity about the car's features. @GSN shares similar questions regarding the stripes, badges, and the trunk's bumper sticker, suggesting that these should be removed for better presentation. @cnj1933 inquires about the car's radiator shroud and how it performs in hot conditions while also requesting videos of the top operating smoothly.
Negative: @brasso_1, who is the seller, acknowledges that the photo on the lead page wasn’t optimal and suggests that the white glove service might have made a poor choice. @hdbaggerdude and @cnj1933 also raise concerns about the hood stripes, questioning the seller for clarity. However, @brasso_1 ultimately provides reassurance regarding the vehicle's performance and condition, stating it doesn't exceed 190 degrees while running.
|
|
|