Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz remarked on the beautiful black finish of this Series III E-Type, calling it incredibly stylish and wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @Dollycat3 praised the car as absolutely superb on every level, while @JAY-Z noted that the upgrades of the vehicle border on perfection, a sentiment echoed by @hr47cars who described the car as a truly handsome race machine and exhilarating to drive. @Hoppy18 appreciated the car's youthful soul despite its age, and @gleasj1 considered it the best E-Type redo he has ever seen. Commenters such as @MalibuRS and @Nailsshortbear highlighted its stunning condition and expressiveness, pointing out its high performance and artistic value.
Neutral: From a seller's perspective, @CarCollectionAdvisors provided detailed insights into the modifications and performance upgrades of the vehicle, noting its rustic yet elegant build with original seats for improved convertible operation. They discussed technical specs such as the V12 engine enhancements, construction choices, and test drive opportunities for potential bidders. Comments seeking clarity, like those from @Jadelva regarding conversion specifics and @M5Z3M focusing on performance metrics, indicate an engaged audience interested in both the vehicle's history and potential.
Negative: Criticism surfaced from @gmm1965, who questioned the vehicle's investment potential, citing a dwindling interest in vintage modified classics and expressing a desire for the car to be restored to its original color. @cap10danny also criticized the lack of air conditioning, highlighting its importance in warmer climates, while @HPLM raised concerns about non-functioning features like the clock. Some comments suggested that the seller was getting defensive towards low bids and that many inquiries were coming from inexperienced commenters rather than serious bidders, as stated by @rofandofy.
 |
 |
Positive: @Mintcoimports (The Seller) describes the LFA as a stunning car that represents a significant piece of automotive artistry, ready to begin its next chapter with a new owner. @Sparrownaut expresses curiosity about the bidding process, recognizing the historic value of this expensive vehicle. @SteveTheodore calls the car one of the greatest ever made, highlighting his unforgettable experience driving one. @Oldhockyplayr admires its breathtaking beauty and appreciates that this particular model has been driven, noting the passion behind it. @boaboyoz refers to it as a scintillating example of a legendary model, while @Mithril911 expresses enthusiasm with a racing heart over the car's design and presence.
Neutral: Several participants are discussing the specifications of the vehicle, such as @tvalli11 questioning the factory specifications of the wheels and @asjfio clarifying that the current wheels were not the original ones. @Flyautoworks asks about service records and whether any clear protection film has been applied to the car, prompting replies from @Mintcoimports (The Seller) that records will be provided and confirming that the car is fully wrapped in paint protection film. The comments reflect both curiosity and anticipation regarding the bidding process and the vehicle's history.
Negative: Some comments reflect doubts about the vehicle’s condition and parts, with @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 criticizing the current wheels as inappropriate and offering to buy them. @neighborhoodbrokie states they won't be bidding and expresses disappointment at being a bystander in the auction. @Flyautoworks points out a lack of oil change records, raising concerns about the car's maintenance history. This suggests a share of skepticism among potential bidders regarding the car's overall condition, despite its desirability.
|
21k-Kilometer 1997 Porsche 911 Carrera S Coupe Vesuvio Edition 6-Speed
WP0ZZZ99ZVS311988
Lot 214415
Dealer
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the Vesuvio Edition 993 as ridiculously good looking, calling it a stupendous specimen and expressing excitement with a comment to good luck with the auction. @deichenb remarked on the amazing color of the car, stating it is a timeless piece, and sharing a personal experience from a car event where their Vesuvio stood out. @OurClassicPorsche agreed, praising the beauty of the Vesuvio and expressing joy in owning such a rare model, stating it offers an opportunity for a lifetime purchase.
Neutral: Comments included inquiries about import tariffs and duties on the vehicle, with @RustBucketList asking for updates, while @WatzUp confirmed the 17% charge that applies to older cars, indicating some controversy regarding its enforcement. @Monzaaa sought information about the dealer's credibility, referencing a potential scam in a previous auction. Others like @982fan provided technical commentary regarding the vehicle's specifications and suggested changes to help clarify details for non-metric users, indicating a degree of engagement with the technical aspects of the car.
Negative: @GruppeC956 commented on the steering wheel, questioning its suitability for the vehicle, while @Istrice lamented the high import costs which could result in a significant premium for buyers. @carlirari noted a discrepancy in paint thickness and asked for clarification, receiving a response from the seller explaining it was due to a protective film. Overall, some comments reflected skepticism about the vehicle's pricing and background, especially considering the significant tariffs that might affect its appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments illustrate a strong appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its elegance and charm. @GDogg described the Dino GT as fantastic and beautiful, while @johnireland emphasized its perfect red color, calling it the ideal car for enthusiasts. @pkmcgee praised the meticulous restoration of the car and the care it has received over the more than five decades of its owner's stewardship. Commenters expressed excitement over the possibility of owning such a stunning vehicle, with @apbb2 stating it was the only RHD car he would consider owning in the US, if financially possible. A sense of nostalgia and admiration surrounds the car, with many noting its historical significance and desirability among collectors.
Neutral: There were numerous inquiries and requests for additional information about the car's specifications, particularly regarding the engine and drivetrain. @Longforlineup queried @voneric about the original engine number and drivetrain details, leading to discussions about the differences in RHD cars in a predominantly LHD market. @sunkat and @Tx246 contributed valuable insights about historical engine variations, discussing possible scenarios for the engine's origins and their implications on the vehicle's value. These queries reflected the interest in ensuring the authenticity and compliance of the car while also considering personal perspectives on driving a RHD in a primarily LHD country, with mixed opinions on the potential market response for RHD models.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding the practicality of driving a right-hand drive vehicle in the US. @Dino70089 and @johnnyb11 expressed hesitations based on their experiences and worries about the steering position. Additionally, @whipcity76 shared mixed feelings about the potential undervaluation of RHD cars in LHD countries, questioning how well RHD models would fare in the US market. @oldcanuck noted dissatisfaction with the driving video provided, labeling it unrepresentative of the car's true capabilities and expressing a desire for a more dynamic portrayal. Overall, while there was a general admiration for the vehicle, these concerns about usability and documentation shaped some reservations among potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @donscars7 has highlighted numerous impressive features of the 1969 Camaro, emphasizing that it has undergone a complete nut and bolt rotisserie restoration backed by extensive documentation, including 85 pictures and over 50 invoices. Many commenters, such as @Chefgordiemac and @Lancer13, appreciated the quality of the restoration and the careful modifications made to the vehicle. @WranglerX noted the car's performance, particularly mentioning that the Edelbrock 383 crate motor produces substantial horsepower and runs cool even in high temperatures, indicating its reliability as a driver.
Neutral: Several comments expressed curiosity about specific features of the Camaro. @WranglerX asked about the Z28 tribute badges and the accuracy of the digital gauges, seeking clarification on the vehicle's capabilities and configuration. @Edward26 inquired about the wheels from a previous auction, indicating an interest in the car's original components. @540Merlin mentioned the oil leak but received clarification from @donscars7 that it was simply due to loose valve cover bolts and not a more serious issue.
Negative: Some users expressed concern over the vehicle's condition and history. @540Merlin specifically inquired about potential oil leaks, hinting at common issues that can arise in classic cars. @BULLITT65 pointed out that the Camaro was originally an X44 base car, suggesting that while the restoration is well done, there are elements that might not align with its original specifications. Additionally, there was a note of sorrow from @mth201 regarding @donscars7's health issues, which led to the sale of this vehicle, hinting at a sense of loss and nostalgia attached to the car.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle's specifications and aesthetic appeal, particularly highlighting the Estoril Blue Crystal color as one of the best choices for the Audi S4. @ModenaOnMyMind expressed admiration for the color, while @GDogg and @HandyDan59 echoed similar sentiments regarding the car's beauty and specifications. @nicebloke also contributed, stating that the sport differential significantly enhances cornering performance, making the car a superb model. The overall feedback reflects a strong appreciation for the car's design and driving capabilities.
Neutral: The seller, @DavidProv, acknowledged the comments from multiple users and provided additional information about the vehicle's condition. He mentioned minor wear on the driver's side floor mat but noted that the passenger side mats were in fantastic shape. In response to questions about the car’s features, @DavidProv explained that factory controls function properly with the addition of Apple CarPlay, and there have been no issues with the water pump or thermostat.
Negative: On the downside, @RatBustard raised concerns regarding the vehicle's oil consumption, prompting a detailed response from @DavidProv about past leaks and maintenance performed to address them. Despite having two quarts of oil in the trunk as a precaution, @DavidProv assured users that the car has been reliable overall. However, more skeptical comments from users like @siggyb inquired about potential corrosion on the undercarriage, indicating that some uncertainty persists regarding the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as a "beautiful Brittany Blue Bloomingdale Bronco" and praises its sensational build. @mike_rockwell commends the builder for modernizing the Bronco and highlights the exceptional detail and top-notch aftermarket components. Moreover, @dogpaws, who personally purchased a Bronco from the builder, shares that Chris went above and beyond to ensure customer satisfaction, even following up six months later to check on the vehicle's functionality and performance. @FourCrowns also emphasizes the exceptional attention to detail in the build, noting that it uses the best components available.
Neutral: @tripleblack raises a question about how this vehicle qualifies as a 1974 Ford Bronco, pointing out that it appears to be constructed with new components. @MD3232 inquires whether the vehicle can be fitted with a hardtop, and @Ro_JaBoy responds that a hardtop should fit with the cage. Additionally, various commenters discuss technical aspects such as the differential ratios, questioning the common belief about their impact on performance in slippery conditions.
Negative: @fordfan329 expresses doubts about inspections for VIN numbers, suggesting that rivets can be identified and may indicate if a tag has been moved from another vehicle. @tasker admits the vehicle is beyond their price range, implying it might not be affordable for everyone. @dhylbert seeks clarification on the purpose of the differential ratio, while @Molae65 reflects on childhood beliefs about front end ratios, indicating some skepticism about that information.
|
 |
Positive: @IcemanBDub praised the vehicle for being a great looking rig with a rare Premium Package+, stating it has fantastic drivetrain dynamics and describes it as the last of its breed. @Gosscars40 (The Seller) provided detailed information about the car's maintenance history, citing that it was meticulously serviced at Porsche of Naples every 5,000 miles and has been well-maintained with a complete 160k service done before the sale. They also emphasized that the vehicle drives as tight as a new one and is currently in excellent condition, aside from minor blemishes.
Neutral: @Lundclan noticed that the passenger seat appeared more rough compared to the driver’s seat and commented that the steering wheel looks larger than usual, although it might be just the camera angle. They mentioned the absence of a tow hitch, which the seller confirmed is true, as the vehicle has never towed anything. @Gosscars40 (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the car's history, clarifying that it has not had any major issues, including providing assurance that there are no oil leaks and that any previously noted issues have been addressed.
Negative: @Lundclan expressed some concern about the condition of the seats, stating they both seem a bit rough, which could imply wear and tear. @BaazAl raised questions regarding the car’s ownership history, specifically whether being listed as a corporate fleet owner indicates it was a rental at some point. However, @Gosscars40 (The Seller) reassured potential buyers about the vehicle's overall condition and clarified aspects of the recall and service history, while inviting more inquiries from potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express positive sentiments about the vehicle's potential and unique features. @ArchSail notes that it serves as a great introduction to Triumphs and appreciates the individuality of its previous owner. @classiccarman57 highlights the value of the car being an overdrive model, calling it a significant positive attribute. Additionally, @Myoldcut offers warm wishes to the seller regarding their health, showcasing a supportive community around the car.
Neutral: Some comments provide neutral observations regarding the car's condition and features. @bklyn46 (The Seller) clarifies that there are no leaks and all gauges work properly while explaining the rationale behind the yellow paint choice. @dmeyers60 and @SlideRuleOne discuss the wheels with varying opinions, and there is a general consensus that appearance improvements could be made. Commenters also ask about handling and the car's capacity for long-distance driving, indicating curiosity without strong opinions either way.
Negative: Several commenters express concerns about certain aspects of the vehicle. @Goss47305 notes a lack of detailed information about potential issues like leaks or paint problems, while @TR6racer comments on the 14-inch wheels and offers advice on folding the top correctly to avoid damage. @bklyn46 (The Seller) mentions problems with the radio receiving static and the glove box sticking, which indicates areas of concern. Overall, while the discussions reveal some negative aspects, the comments also show an appreciation for the car's character.
|
 |
Positive: @caspa: Priming the pot 🙂 Nice truck. @Briantompson: Clean truck. @Davidch1974 (The Seller): Truck is a great truck with tons of power, drives outstanding.
Neutral: @Davidch1974 (The Seller): I have many trucks, just going a diff way and not holding so many trucks, tuff decision to sell this one.
Negative: @topdownta: Why does this truck seem to be bouncing around between owners? Why the short ownership term?
|
 |
Positive: The 2017 Land Rover Range Rover HSE Td6 Diesel has garnered praise for its impressive features and luxurious options, such as the Climate Comfort and Vision Assist Packages, which include heated seats and adaptive headlights, enhancing the comfort and driving experience. @MJLMotorcars (The Seller) highlights its strong driving performance with the smooth-shifting eight-speed automatic transmission and effective air suspension, while maintaining a clean history with regular maintenance and upgrades, making it ready for its next owner. Both @993dz and @jsv express satisfaction with their ownership experience, noting the vehicle's comfort and fuel efficiency, especially on long highway drives, further indicating the model's appeal.
Neutral: Several users have inquired about the vehicle's specifics, such as @jsv asking for the original window sticker and @CiChen requesting photos of the ski port. @stanleyvanburen introduces questions regarding the reliability of the Td6 in comparison to gas models. @MJLMotorcars (The Seller) provides informative responses, affirming that the original window sticker is indeed available and discussing the Td6's advantages, including ease of maintenance and better fuel efficiency, which align with the vehicle's positive reputation.
Negative: Despite its strengths, some drawbacks were highlighted by owners. @jsv recounted a significant repair involving a clogged DPF that cost around $5,000, indicating potential long-term maintenance concerns. Similarly, @993dz brought up the upkeep required for managing the Adblue system and complications that can arise, illustrating possible challenges that may surface with the Td6, even if experiences have been generally favorable. There’s a note of caution about these issues, reminding potential buyers to consider maintenance aspects when evaluating this vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @RiffRaff expresses excitement about the vehicle, mentioning that it is cool and highlighting the 12-volt system addition as a significant bonus, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @CarDogThreePedals appreciates the truck's charm and makes a nostalgic connection to a song about a truck, noting that it is nicer than the one in the tune. @bosshoss3406pack reflects positively on the vehicle by sharing a personal story about a similar truck, reminiscing about good times from the past.
Neutral: @Lewis raises a point questioning whether the vehicle ought to be labeled as a project, prompting @bosshoss3406pack to remind that the classification of projects can vary by individual perspective. @Lord_Balfour_IV comments on the vehicle's patina, uncertain whether it's authentic or not, suggesting it would benefit from paint and can be a 'build as you go' project. @over the hill simply conveys that the truck requires a bit of love and care, which indicates potential for improvement without outright criticism.
Negative: @zy1125 has practical concerns about the vehicle, asking if there is a cold-start video available and whether it produces smoke upon starting, as well as inquiring about any current leaks and the functionality of aftermarket gauges. These concerns point to a need for reassurance regarding the truck's mechanical state. Additionally, @PMB-BTR expresses a personal frustration that the vehicle is not located closer, indicating a missed opportunity for a potential buyer.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and overall appeal. @Caymanorcarrera highlighted their fondness for the Cashmere color, while @69_911e described the SC Targa as beautiful and referred to the paint color as 'butterscotch'. @Mg123 praised the car's potential as a daily driver, indicating it could be the perfect choice for everyday use. @mark_99 echoed similar sentiments, commenting on the uniqueness of the Cashmere color and extending good luck wishes to the seller. Additionally, @countachyl expressed hope that all questions about the vehicle would be answered, indicating a supportive community interest in the car.
Neutral: There were several inquiries from potential buyers looking for clarity regarding the car's condition and specifications. @tff and @ericteti posed questions regarding the extent of the paintwork done on the car, with @tff asking if the '78 stickers were removable and about noises in a driving video. @david05111 specifically questioned the nature of the paintwork and whether the heat system was functional, indicating common concerns with older models. @SunValleyAutos (The Seller) responded to many of these questions, explaining the nature of the oil seepage and addressing concerns about the condition of the air conditioning and heating systems. The seller confirmed paintwork in certain areas while assuring that the car did not leak oil significantly in their showroom.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the car's condition and potential issues that could arise. @david05111 expressed apprehensions regarding the extent of the paint repairs that had been performed, questioning if it was just minor fixes or a full respray. Similarly, @ericteti pressed for detailed insights about potential transmission oil leakage, which @78SCTurboTarga speculated was normal behavior for the vehicle but could require attention. Concerns were also voiced about the engine's head studs, with @ericteti and others highlighting the importance of this issue in a car of this age. @a78911SC poignantly shared a personal story about missing a similar model due to maintenance challenges, highlighting the potential long-term costs of ownership that could deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Orbframe, the seller, received praise for their transparency regarding the engine replacement, with @CoopCity expressing gratitude for their honesty. Many commenters appreciated the detailed explanation of the engine's failure and the subsequent replacement, noting @Orbframe's adherence to break-in procedures. @BubbaSmurf also complimented the vehicle's aesthetics, stating it looks better without the stripes, showing enthusiasm for the car's design.
Neutral: Commenters were curious about the model comparisons, with @SG4607 wanting to know the performance difference between the GT350 and the 2024 Darkhorse, while @Orbframe provided insights on engine specifications and power differences. Other users like @Cwbryson shared personal anecdotes about their break-in experiences with similar vehicles, indicating a community of car enthusiasts who valuably share knowledge and experiences. The discussion regarding warranty options also highlighted factors to consider when purchasing a used vehicle, with both the seller and others sharing information on warranties.
Negative: Concerns were raised about engine reliability, particularly from @sleepyfloyd, who noted the fear of engine failures affecting potential buyers. @GrandmaGilmore shared a frustrating experience with similar issues, detailing a recall that occurred with the 2020 model, illustrating the challenges faced with quality assurance during production. @RHG357 and others questioned the specifics behind the engine's catastrophic failure, indicating that some users are apprehensive about the car's history and afraid it may deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Multiple commenters praised the vehicle’s build quality, with @alwaysbored786 calling it a 'great build!' and @Roadrunner_CT exclaiming, 'Good grief this is glorious!' @NickyBlack referred to the car as a 'Unicorn build,' while @MitchG shared his admiration with a statement about its wonderful craftsmanship. The seller, @Iconicag, detailed the extensive work that went into the car, including a new paint job and hardware updates, which further impressed the community. The feedback on the car's performance features, such as its A/C and drivetrain sourced from an E46 M3, was also received well, showcasing confidence in the car's capabilities.
Neutral: There were several inquiries from potential buyers, with questions ranging from the functionality of the undercarriage to specifics about the suspension system. @dnapp and @Cattywampus both asked about various features and asked for additional photos and videos to provide clarity. @sdmjake raised concerns regarding the visual balance of the car in photographs, while @peteb24555 sought clarification on the transmission setup. These comments indicated a level of scrutiny and engagement from the buyers looking for reassurance about their investment.
Negative: Conversely, some issues emerged regarding the purchasing process. @Geonate88 expressed frustration over the lack of response from the seller despite their proximity, leading to missed opportunities as they couldn't see the car before bidding. @sdmjake noted a perceived lopsidedness in the car's stance, questioning whether it was a suspension issue or an optical illusion from the photos. There were also concerns about neglected details, such as a brake light that appeared to be out during one of the videos shared by @Iconicag, which raised doubts about the vehicle's readiness for immediate long-distance travel.
|
 |
Positive: @scottybmdmup describes the vehicle as a beautiful automobile and expresses hope that it finds someone who can restore it to its factory glory. @porkpiehat notes its charisma and sees potential for it as a great highway traveler, suggesting light modifications could enhance it further. @Craven appreciates its tough look, while @Tony63Bee praises its dashboard as one of the greatest ever made, highlighting its artistic design for that era. Other comments emphasize excitement about the engine, with @weim55 and @noah300g speculating on impressive features that contribute to the car's desirability.
Neutral: The comments reflect a shared appreciation for the vehicle's unique qualities, such as its potential for restoration and modifications. @ford101 prompts the seller to provide more information about the engine based on observations made by @weim55 and @Nolanbd43, reflecting a collaborative conversation about the car's details. @bringatrailer acknowledges the input from various commenters regarding the engine and updates the listing based on their contributions, indicating an ongoing dialogue about the vehicle's specifications.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns about the car's practicality and marketability, particularly @noah300g, who suggests that the vehicle would sell quicker and for a higher price if it were a two-door model. @neilpierson25 humorously implies that the car might need some maintenance, specifically oil-dry for oil leaks. Additionally, @scottybmdmup's comment hints at a social critique, associating the car with those who have superficial wealth, suggesting it may not attract buyers who truly appreciate its values.
|
 |
Positive: Many users expressed admiration for the vehicle, with @craZee calling it "Yummy!" and @4RINGSx3 praising the build quality. @azalomskiy (The Seller) confirmed that the car features a front and rear camera system. Enthusiasts like @gumby74 and @Datsunofa found the build impressive and appreciated the attention to detail, especially the chassis reinforcement and the aesthetic of the car's factory copper paint. Comments also highlighted the overall performance, with @woodruffhallz expressing excitement over the car's power output of 410hp and 410lb torque.
Neutral: There were several inquiries about specific features and functionalities of the vehicle. @fjfhh4k34f asked about the air conditioning system, frame modifications, and potential rust issues. In response, @azalomskiy (The Seller) clarified that the car does not have AC, explained the frame modifications made during the build, and mentioned that all rusted panels have been replaced. Additionally, @MCTECH raised concerns about the vehicle's registration in California due to emissions regulations, to which @azalomskiy responded that it would need to pass SMOG and might face challenges in that aspect.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about imperfections in the car's bodywork. @fjfhh4k34f pointed out potential issues with door alignment, questioning whether the frame had been tweaked during restoration or if previous repairs were inadequate. @leo23k noted a bump in the hood's sheet metal and sought evidence of the hood's non-clearance issues. @Datsunofa mentioned the oddity of the small hood blemish post-bodywork, suggesting that if it couldn't be properly repaired, replacing it with a carbon fiber version could be an intriguing option. Overall, while many were impressed with the vehicle, there were notable concerns about its condition that could impact potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @dekats1 has provided extensive background information about the car, sharing his experience as a long-time BMW enthusiast. He mentions that this 330 coupe is the most reliable BMW he has ever owned and emphasizes that it was meticulously maintained with service records available. Commentors like @kccampro and @Amrossi21 praise the cleanliness and color of the vehicle, reinforcing the notion of it being a well-cared-for car. @KarmannClassic also appreciates the owner's attention to maintenance and expresses admiration for the E46's driving characteristics, stating that it has been a fantastic car.
Neutral: Multiple commentors, including @Micklovin and @brianmpower, have inquired about specific maintenance issues such as the clutch status, suspension components, and overheating incidents. @dekats1 responds by assuring them that all maintenance has been regularly performed and that there are no significant issues present. He mentions a single instance of overheating at around 100k miles, which he managed promptly without any resulting engine damage. Additionally, @slickshift asks about the headliner condition, and while the owner acknowledges some sagging, he has taken steps to rectify it.
Negative: There are concerns from some potential buyers, such as @Micklovin, who question the condition of the tires and whether the car exhibits any vibrations. @markenman raises a concern regarding the rear subframe, although @dekats1 clarifies that any issues with cracking were inspected and absent in this particular model. Moreover, @kevin2000 specifically asks whether the overheating incident led to any damage, which indicates some anxiety about the car's mechanical history. Overall, there are hints of apprehension about the car's past, although the seller does his best to address these concerns.
|
 |
Positive: @Spaceman_Gomez praised the seller's vehicle, expressing regret for not finding a similar clean Black TJ Rubicon sooner and describing it as amazing, indicating it's one of the best around. He showed enthusiasm for potentially winning the vehicle, mentioning plans for enhancements like a gold-plated oil pan. @8araul83 (The Seller) received positive interest throughout the comments, including offers to answer questions and share additional videos and pictures of the vehicle, which displayed a proactive approach to clarifying concerns from potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments from @marindoc108 and @DustyCrackers sought clarification about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding potential damage and the state of the black paint visible in the provided photos. The seller responded by issuing additional pictures, striving to clear any confusion related to oxidation or rust and noted some details of the previous accident, maintaining transparency about the vehicle's history and condition. The conversation demonstrated an ongoing exchange of information aimed at fostering trust and addressing buyer concerns.
Negative: @Spike_Strip raised doubts about the oil pan replacement, speculating it might be related to the prior accident and suggested that it was fixed using a used part. Although @8araul83 (The Seller) confirmed the oil pan's current condition, concerns lingered about the potential impact of the accident on the vehicle's state. This illustrates some skepticism among potential buyers about the history of the vehicle, suggesting that, while interest in the vehicle is high, unanswered questions regarding repairs and damages could deter some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @ElDiabloRojo (The Seller) provides excellent service by being available all week for questions, and the vehicle itself has received enthusiastic comments such as @Icecreammatt noting its rarity, being a unique red color among 997 models. @Chi_PT expresses excitement for the manual GTS variant, which many see as a coveted model, and @Airliner1 refers to it as 'the Holy Grail'. Enthusiasts appreciate the vehicle's specifications, with @aileron74 praising the features and overall design, emphasizing the appeal of the 997.2 GTS.
Neutral: General appreciation for the car's features and specifications is found throughout, as @davidcarson48 suggests that the picturesque autumn scenery is perfect for driving a car like this. The community engages in discussion about the importance of MSRP and value, with @TUD17, @Chi_PT, and @mgolax43 participating. There is recognition of the car's worth and what previous owners have experienced, as seen in @cbalster's comment about owning a similar model and enjoying the chase of ownership.
Negative: Some comments highlight skepticism about the secrecy surrounding the MSRP, as @RatherJaded points out that transparency could be helpful. @mgolax43 expresses doubts about the seller's intentions, suggesting a potential for resale at a markup. Discussions veer towards concerns about dealers bidding on the vehicle, with comments from @SpeedJunky and @Chi_PT critiquing those who complain without participating actively in bidding. The validity of the pricing discussion brings some tension among commenters.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express positive sentiments, highlighting the overall appeal of the vehicle. @carmikemich describes it as a 'Nice Car,' indicating an appreciation for its appearance and condition.
Neutral: Several commenters are seeking additional information to make an informed decision. @FishOhio is interested in both the sets of keys and requests videos for a better assessment of the vehicle, while @TooManyTabs has specific questions about the maintenance history, mentioning concerns over the original coolant, brake fluid, and original tires from 2011. @ajgentileiii (The Seller) provides clarifications, stating there is one key currently available and that the OEM exhaust is not included, as it was scrapped.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by commenters regarding the vehicle's condition. @TooManyTabs points out a lack of information in the Carfax report and a need for maintenance records, questioning if the car is due for anything. Additionally, @carmikemich inquires about potential fluid leaks, interior odors, and other issues, showing caution about the vehicle's overall health.
|
 |
Positive: There are several enthusiastic comments about the Mercedes vehicle, highlighting its beauty and desirability. @buellwinkle described it as 'Gorgeous' and unique, while @Chefgordiemac noted it is a 'Very nice Merc' and provided encouragement with 'GLWTA!!' indicating good luck with the auction. Additionally, @benzgirl617 (The Seller) emphasized the vehicle's excellent condition, mentioning it has been well-maintained, garaged, and has no driving issues, supporting the positive sentiment surrounding the vehicle.
Neutral: Comments reflecting neutral sentiments primarily focus on inquiries and requests for additional information about the vehicle. @Cbaypa asked if everything works properly and if there are any reliability issues, seeking reassurance about taking it on longer drives. @ASFSUPRa inquired specifically about the car's air conditioning, while @Mystaru requested clarification on the type of suspension. These questions indicate that potential buyers are gathering necessary information without overtly negative or positive bias.
Negative: Some comments touched on concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @TommyC suggested that the wheels need refinishing and an appropriate set of tires, implying that the vehicle may need some cosmetic updates. Additionally, the inquiry from @jbr4th about why the car was being sold again could suggest potential doubts about its value or condition, although @benzgirl617 (The Seller) clarified that the previous sale fell through due to financing issues, alleviating some of those concerns.
|
 |
Positive: @Valiantjim expresses nostalgia for the Power Wagon, noting its iconic place in the history of trucks, particularly favoring the 360 engine for its versatility. He views it as a classic vehicle that symbolizes the essence of serious trucks. @bosshoss3406pack concurs, proclaiming the Power Wagon as synonymous with 'MoPar, MoPower,' emphasizing its reputation as a workhorse. @DMM13 shares a fond memory of their first truck, which adds sentimental value to the discussion about this vehicle.
Neutral: @amazon121 inquires about the truck's reliability for a long drive to New Hampshire, to which @TylerMX62, the seller, responds affirmatively, sharing his past experiences with the truck. The seller mentions the truck is "slow and thirsty," but its functionality is not compromised. Throughout the conversation, there are technical inquiries about the vehicle's gearing and modifications that showcase a shared interest in enhancing its driveability.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the vehicle's performance and condition. For instance, @Atomic_Tomcat questions the removal of the auxiliary fuel tank and the functionality of the oil pressure gauge, probing about the truck's oil consumption and RPM at highway speeds. @TylerMX62 acknowledges that the truck does use some oil, requiring a top-off of about a quart per tank, indicating potential maintenance issues.
|
 |
Positive: @bmchan appreciates the vehicle for its nice appearance and especially compliments the wheels. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) responds positively to the comments highlighting the vehicle's transparency and commitment to thorough documentation, assuring potential buyers of its condition with detailed information. The seller emphasizes the level of transparency provided in the auction process, mentioning numerous videos and photos included to establish trust with bidders.
Neutral: @Lesr3204 requests the manufactured date of the vehicle, indicating his interest in knowing more about its production specifics. @Segura911 inquires about any warning lights on the dashboard to understand potential inspection issues, while @bluesman looks for clarity on any service records, specifically related to repairs that might affect the car's functionality. The seller replies to these inquiries, confirming no warning lights are present and mentioning the lack of service records known to them, but emphasizing the vehicle shows no signs of failure.
Negative: @bmchan expresses concern over the condition of the headlights, suggesting that a cloudy lens could indicate a past accident. @sjcby points out a potential misalignment issue between the hood and bumper on the passenger side, questioning the vehicle’s structural integrity. @bluesman raises a concern over the vehicle's visible repairs noted in the Carfax history, which highlights a need for more transparency regarding prior maintenance and issues.
|
 |
Positive: @Bennyz (The Seller) expresses excitement about the wagon, indicating it has been well taken care of and is enjoyable to drive. @bosshoss3406pack views it as a fine vehicle, praising its quality and wishing good luck with the auction. @bkrug shares a fondness for the Fairlane Wagons, noting that the distinct design and rarity make it a great car for shows and enjoyment.
Neutral: Commenters like @gocorcoran and @fincruiser discuss the vehicle's brake modifications, acknowledging that while upgrades may affect classification in car shows, they don’t necessarily detract from the vehicle's value. @CarFoolLane mentions the oddness of Chevy wheels on a Ford but appreciates the wagon's straightforward design. @Dhturk offers a technical detail regarding the brakes, while @Falconer1024 finds that front disc brakes were available from the factory, adding context to the discussion.
Negative: @CarFoolLane points out serious sidewall cracks on at least one tire, raising concerns about safety. @hairyolds suggests the need for correct style Ford wheels instead of the currently fitted Chevy rallies. Some comments imply that modifications could lead to a misunderstanding of the vehicle's authenticity during competitions, with @gocorcoran mentioning potential penalties in certain judging classes.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its attractive design and unique features. For instance, @bosshoss3406pack noted the truck's appeal, calling it 'Great Looking Truck!!!' while another user reminiscing about having a similar model mentioned its fun driving experience, showcasing its enjoyable nature. @WhipDesign21 (The Seller) also conveyed enthusiasm for the truck, referring to it as a 'unicorn' and inviting engagement from potential buyers, which adds to the positive atmosphere around the auction.
Neutral: A few commenters provided neutral insights, focusing on specific features of the vehicle. @MHHamrhead shared information about the gear ratios from different model years, indicating an upgrade in later versions. @Dtwalkerfl and @DLVRYMN inquired about details such as tire dates and undercarriage photos, reflecting a general interest in verifying the truck's condition without expressing overt enthusiasm or negativity.
Negative: Some comments hinted at underlying concerns or questions regarding the vehicle's history. @caozman raised the point about previous ownership, suggesting a potential strategy for resale which might indicate uncertainty over the truck's long-term value. Additionally, comments like those from @chollie, pondering on how much time was spent revving the exhaust, implied concern about usage that could affect the truck's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the Kawasaki 90, with several reflecting on its nostalgic value and their own positive experiences with similar motorcycles. @GasStation (The Seller) promoted the bike's fun and nimble nature, indicating it would be a great fit for someone looking for an enjoyable ride. @Citabria98 mentioned their history with motorcycles, noting the bike would look cool among their collection. @chdunaif praised its well-preserved condition, suggesting it could potentially go for a bargain price, while @Lilboy21 simply called it a "sweet bike."
Neutral: There were multiple requests for additional content related to the bike, such as cold starting and riding videos. @PGO and @Capthorod1 both expressed interest in seeing how the bike performs in action. @Mike_Parsons queried about the gearbox layout, indicating potential buyers want to know specifics about the bike's mechanics. The interactive nature of the comments suggests an engaged audience curious about both the bike's features and its history.
Negative: Some commenters reflected on their past experiences rather somberly, with one stating that their riding days are behind them, which implies a sense of loss for the joys of riding. @Elementnomore recalled riding a version of the bike in the past but seemed to attach a hint of nostalgia mixed with reality about how times have changed. @rexfox reflected on the immense distance he rode on such a small bike, perhaps contemplating the changes in both motorcycle culture and personal experience over the years.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a lot of attention, especially at recent events like the Red Rock Car Show, where it was praised for its size, sound, and driving experience. @Lagunacruiser, the Seller, describes the truck as a joy to drive, emphasizing its solid feel thanks to the Red Head steering gearbox and that it tracks straight, making it easy to handle. The inclusion of a working air conditioning system was also positively highlighted, which contributes to its desirability as a classic vehicle.
Neutral: Several inquiries about the vehicle have been met with informative responses. @Bourru50 asked about the title, to which @Lagunacruiser confirmed it is a clean Nevada title. Additionally, comments regarding the vehicle's seating comfort were addressed, noting that while the front seats do not recline, they can move back and forth. Other concerns, such as the vehicle's highway performance and steering alignment, were acknowledged, but without any significant negatives indicated by the Seller.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's steering gear and alignment, particularly by @Demoner1, who mentioned it appeared to be slightly off in the video. @Lagunacruiser reassured him that the steering box is new and that while the alignment is off a few degrees, the truck is still very manageable and drives well for its age. @Onlythetruthsorry1223 mentioned potential issues with highway speed due to the large tires and manual transmission, though @Lagunacruiser reassured them about the truck's capability at speeds of 65-70 miles per hour.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express anticipation and appreciation regarding the vehicle on auction from Collectible Classics. @Scott68GTO brings up a humorous notion about the car being used only for church on Sundays, with @neverenoughgold agreeing in a light-hearted manner. The seller, Collectibleclassics, showcases transparency and thoroughness in their vehicle documentation, which resonates positively with potential buyers, enhancing trust in the sales process.
Neutral: Several individuals inquire about specific details regarding the car, like @jkeller721 asking for photos of the underside of the front bumper and @tylerrab expressing interest in viewing the car in person. Collectibleclassics responds promptly, indicating their availability for inspections and offering details about scheduling visits. @yardbird221 raises a question about shipping costs to Sacramento, which the seller also addresses by providing a clear breakdown of fees.
Negative: Concerns arise about the vehicle's condition, particularly in comments made by @jkeller721 who gets reassured that there are only a few scrapes under the passenger side. While this creates a minor concern, it does not overshadow the overall positive sentiment expressed by the seller's commitment to transparency and thorough documentation. The seller's comments reflect a dedication to customer service, yet the need for further vehicle inspections indicates that some potential buyers are proceeding cautiously.
|
 |
Positive: @Caymanorcarrera mentioned that this 28-year-old motorhome is likely to remain reliable and comfortable for future owners, highlighting the impressive craftsmanship of its manufacturer. @e9er and @OutOfMyElement also expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, noting the appealing interior while @rickaz whimsically suggested it beats buying a tiny home. @GXguy470 praised the build quality of Monaco motorhomes, asserting that they surpass newer models, and @Jonesy66 conveyed an enthusiastic remark about its charm despite minor imperfections. @Y2K911 noted the good condition of the vehicle relative to its age, appreciating the unique carpet.
Neutral: @jhansy (The Seller) provided comprehensive details about the motorhome, underscoring its cleanliness and recent maintenance updates, including a roof recoating with a 10-year warranty. He also addressed questions regarding the motorhome's features, such as its towing capacity and interior dimensions. Additionally, @Metrofreaks inquired about an existing hydraulic leak, to which @chiplamb recommended that the leak should be fixed for proper operation. The seller confirmed awareness of the issue and inability to resolve it before the auction's end.
Negative: While many comments were positive, there were some concerns. @BMcD asked about the necessary ground-school training for operating systems and maintenance of the vehicle, suggesting possible complexities. @Prolfes questioned the sleeping capacity, hinting there might be limitations for accommodating more than two people. Furthermore, @Metrofreaks prompted the seller about the hydraulic line leak, indicating a potential risk for buyers who prioritize operational safety. @VolvoguyKC humorously raised eyebrows regarding some interior pictures, hinting at discomfort with the state of certain features.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the Ford Pickup as "senbloodysational" with an amazing build, highlighting its cool factor. @mike_rockwell praises the detailed and innovative F-1 build, noting the creative elements that were executed well. @tlcamg expresses admiration for the truck's design and colors, appreciating the effort put into the project. @rickaz commends the paint job and execution of the build, adding a supportive comment with GLWTA!
Neutral: @bb1984 (The Seller) shares information about the truck, stating it was purchased from a builder in Texas and is available for inspection at his dealership in Missouri. When queried about the truck's title and age by @Klm50, the seller confirms it is titled as a 1948 with an original VIN. In response to @erdoc91, @bb1984 confirms that the truck’s A/C is cold and provides details about the title's listed weight of 4000 lbs, addressing inquiries from potential bidders.
Negative: @bondgraham mentions that not much of the original 1948 truck remains aside from the sheet metal, and suggests a different color choice for a more period-correct appearance, indicating a slight disappointment. @wannabid55 expresses concern about the fitment of the hood and suggests it should be addressed before closing a deal. @Mmdel questions whether the hood fitting issue is more serious than just needing an adjustment, indicating potential hesitation for interested buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlight the exceptional quality and appeal of the vehicle, with @nexusautobrokers mentioning the significant service investment made to ensure its excellent condition, such as replacing the timing belt and water pump. The car's original and pristine nature has impressed commenters like @Raffi, who describes it as a 'freight train of excellence,' while @TimOsmond expresses a strong fondness for early Lexus sedans, showing an eager interest in bidding. @JimBobCooter appreciates the aesthetic of the white on white color scheme, noting that it looks great, and @Electraglider confidently asserts that you couldn't find a finer sedan from that era.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding specific features of the vehicle, particularly concerning the heated seats. @PadreDelOso asks for clarification about the seat heater buttons' absence in the photos, leading to a discussion where @nexusautobrokers confirms that the car was ordered without heated seats, likely due to its Vegas origin. @SchlickT and @RetroDriver engage in a conversation about the originality of the hubcaps, indicating a thorough interest in the car's details. Overall, these comments reflect a general curiosity rather than a definitive stance on the vehicle's value or appeal.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, there are a few cautionary notes in the comments. @cardisxteen humorously advises against parking the car near docks or marinas, suggesting a concern about water exposure. Additionally, @Benjim34 expresses disbelief regarding the presence of heated seats, noting that he doubts this feature exists in the listed vehicle. Such hints of skepticism, while mild, show that not all participants are fully sold on the vehicle's attributes.
|
 |
Positive: @CLBSPORTSCARS (The Seller) expressed excitement about presenting the FZJ80 to the auction, emphasizing its clean condition and inviting potential buyers to view it in person. Commenters like @KZN185Surf praised the vehicle's aesthetics, particularly the decal choices and mentioned having similar wheels on their own vehicles. @10figs and others appreciated the overall appearance of the 80 series, acknowledging its appeal.
Neutral: Many questions were raised regarding specific mechanical aspects of the FZJ80, such as potential leaks in the birfield joints raised by @JayZee77, and @Mtnbum's inquiries about the exhaust brand and tire carrier compatibility. @jam4bugout asked for the exact height measurement, to which the Seller responded with dimensions confirming it stands at approximately 80.7 inches. The seller also replied to comments about the absence of a towing hitch and clarified that the vehicle's registration status in certain states does not require recent smog tests.
Negative: Concerns were expressed by @Vintagecrusher about the absence of recent smog tests and the potential for rust on the vehicle. @Vintagecrusher also questioned the condition of the air bags, indicating a need for scrutiny in those areas. @Mtnbum pointed out a possible discrepancy in the suspension information regarding the Old Man Emu parts versus what was done previously, creating a sense of uncertainty about the vehicle’s current state.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express appreciation for the vehicle's appeal, with @Caymanorcarrera describing it as a "pretty darn nice water-cooled 911" and @GPC566 (The Seller) engaging positively with inquiries about features and maintenance history. The vehicle has a strong backing due to the fact that the 2009 Porsche 997 Carrera S eliminated previous IMS bearing issues, as noted by @Jacquerot, bringing confidence to potential buyers regarding engine reliability. The seller's willingness to supply a cold start and driving video further enhances positive sentiment toward the vehicle.
Neutral: Several individuals are seeking clarification regarding the vehicle's service history and features. Comments from @blbennett1288 and @Axel231 inquire about cold start videos, DME reports, and recent PDK service records, reflecting a community of interested buyers eager to know more. @(The Seller) GPC566 addresses these questions directly, mentioning recent services including an 80k mile completion, though some are concerned about specific details like the state of the underbody, with @notacollector questioning potential fluid seepage.
Negative: Some commenters voice concerns about specific details regarding the vehicle's condition. @notacollector expresses ambiguity over whether the underbody was wet or covered in grime, while @Dsa85 questions the authenticity of the steering wheel, suggesting it may not be original. Additionally, @Rnashcpa points out the limited mileage the seller has driven the vehicle and questions the reasoning behind it, indicating a potential hesitation to fully endorse the purchase without more driving experience.
|
 |
Positive: The auction for this 2009 Mercedes Benz X164 GL450 4Matic has sparked interest among commentors who appreciate the various features it offers. @aegmotorsports highlights its premium package offerings, which include heated front seats, a dual-screen rear seat entertainment system, and a robust Harman Kardon surround-sound system. Many viewers have expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's luxurious features, such as the leather seat trim and the burl walnut wood interior detailing, which enhance its aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Commentors have raised pertinent questions regarding specific features of the vehicle. @Wisconsindayton inquires about the availability of ventilated front seats, while @Tonehound asks whether the remotes for the rear entertainment system are included. @CTT requests information on the condition of the headliner in the vehicle, following up on previous listings to ensure transparency and thoroughness.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments about the vehicle, but potential buyers may have expectations that certain features, like ventilated seats, are included, even though @aegmotorsports clarified that the vehicle only has heated seats. Additionally, while the seller provides a comprehensive description of the vehicle's features and packages, any perceived shortcomings would likely depend on individual expectations and preferences.
|
 |
Positive: @CRUSH expressed excitement about the presence of three double cab Tacomas on the BAT platform, indicating a positive impression of the vehicle's popularity. @Dewey789 noted that the undercarriage of the Tacoma appears clean with new paint, suggesting it might have been well-maintained and could last for many more miles.
Neutral: @ETown_Lonnie requested a cold start video, indicating an interest in seeing how the vehicle performs at startup. @Rjoe inquired about availability for an in-person viewing, indicating potential interest without expressing strong opinions either way. @carmunoz, the seller, provided information about additional items that come with the truck, including an aftermarket radio and some Toyota parts, which could be of neutral interest to potential buyers.
Negative: @rgfulks raised a concern about whether the Tacoma had undergone a frame replacement, which hints at potential issues regarding the vehicle's structural integrity. However, @Dewey789 responded by stating that there was no mention of frame replacement in the Carfax report, suggesting that while concerns exist, there is also a reassurance about its history. Overall, some doubts linger regarding the vehicle's condition based on the comments.
|
 |
Positive: @DatsunSteven (The Seller) shared that the car ran flawlessly during a long trip in hot weather, stating it performed like a dream. The aesthetic appeal of the vehicle has attracted positive attention, with the seller mentioning that people frequently compliment the car's black and gold finish, indicating a high level of visual appeal and desirability.
Neutral: @StockZ commented on the current market for Anniversary Editions, noting that it might be a good time to acquire one as prices are soft. They suggested that some detailing and repairs could enhance the car's exhibit potential for car enthusiast gatherings. @Classic_Steel inquired about specific details regarding the condition of the hatch and the strength of the engine, as well as the condition of the tires, seeking more information before making a purchase decision.
Negative: @DatsunSteven (The Seller) mentioned that the steering wheel shakes slightly at certain speeds, which, while not significant, is a point of concern. Additionally, there appears to be some rust in the car, particularly in places near the hatch and inside the door, which @Classic_Steel pointed out. The seller acknowledged the rust and stated they would provide more information about the tires later.
|
 |
Positive: @VantageAuto expresses enthusiasm about the 2014 Porsche Cayenne Diesel, highlighting its powerful 3.0 liter Turbo Diesel engine that combines efficiency with impressive torque. The seller describes the vehicle as beautiful inside and out, noting it is in excellent condition with no significant damage or odors. Additionally, @bestman718 shares their admiration for the vehicle, indicating love for their own similar model and the great looks of the Cayenne Diesel. @cpa713 also praises the vehicle, calling it a "stunner" and showing appreciation for the Diesels.
Neutral: @clemente102 remarks on the truck's unique gray interior and requests more information, including the window sticker and specs. This comment suggests the vehicle may be a base model, highlighting the trailer hitch as a notable feature. While keen on details, @clemente102 also inquires about the condition of various components, such as the clock and tires, indicating a need for clarity before proceeding further with potential interest in the auction. The seller, @VantageAuto, responds to inquiries regarding the tires being seven years old and reassures that they are still in great shape.
Negative: Some participants express concerns about the vehicle's maintenance history and current condition. @NavyVet2023 brings up the possibility of outstanding recalls related to the emissions and fuel gauge issues common with the model year. @csy asks specific questions regarding the condition of the spark plugs and suspension, indicating a need for assurance about the vehicle's operational status. Overall, there are implications that prospective buyers should consider the age and condition of components before making a bid.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle are generally very favorable. @jeremiah808 (The Seller) engages positively with potential buyers, mentioning how it's important to stay hydrated when driving, thanks to the vehicle's exhilarating performance. @billyblyth describes it as the 'Super Snake' of pickups, which adds to its appeal. @Notgonnagiveit expresses admiration for the truck's appearance and is supportive, stating it looks fantastic, and even fantasizes about it residing on a small island. Additionally, @cross08 appreciates the color of the truck and praises its suitability for families, enhancing its appeal to those with children.
Neutral: Several users inquired about practical aspects of the vehicle. @Jefbeck asked about the shipping costs to Chicago, to which @jeremiah808 (The Seller) provided an estimate based on previous experiences, indicating a range around $4,000. Similarly, @D3cl41m3 expressed interest in purchasing the vehicle and inquired about shipping to Europe, showing that there are various potential buyers considering logistics despite being new to the platform. These comments suggest interest in the vehicle but also highlight the practical considerations involved in purchasing such a high-end pickup.
Negative: There are very few negative comments about the vehicle. Most comments express excitement and a positive outlook, but @Notgonnagiveit does mention a concern about the vehicle being a fit for their specific lifestyle, albeit not in a direct criticism of the truck itself. Overall, the presence of mainly positive comments with minimal negativity suggests a strong appreciation for the vehicle, indicating that it resonates well within the community.
|
 |
Positive: @VantageAuto (The Seller) praises the 2011 Infiniti EX35 AWD as an exceptional vehicle with ultra low mileage, noting its rarity as it's never been listed on BaT before. The seller highlights its fun driving experience, likening it favorably to the BMW X3, and commends the reliable and powerful 3.5-liter V6 engine. Additionally, they mention the attractive Arctic Blue color that makes the car stand out, along with a well-maintained interior and useful tech features such as surround view cameras. @luzarj also shares a positive experience, describing the same year and color of the vehicle as a "unicorn" and a great ride.
Neutral: Commenters like @mr_smee express intrigue about the car's future as a collectible, while @porkpiehat also shares curiosity about these vehicles. @Eddy622611 raises a concern regarding the vehicle's height and accessibility for their wife, seeking specific measurements to compare it with her current vehicle. Responses indicate that it's designed more like a car than an SUV, and @VantageAuto assures potential buyers that while it has higher ground clearance than a C300, it isn't as tall as a Ford Escape. Questions about the vehicle's condition, such as @AVN's inquiry about the dashboard and door cards, are handled positively by the seller, who confirms there are no issues.
Negative: @Sjalabais discusses the vehicle's design, indicating it does not yet hold classic status, describing it as looking both too old and too young for its age. They suggest that calling it a station wagon may be an understatement, creating a less favorable impression of its categorization. @cnj1933 shares concerns about getting a date code on the tires and mentions that tires over eight years old would not pass inspection in Arizona, hinting at potential issues with aging components. Another commenter raises concerns about potential cracks in the dashboard, indicating a generalized worry regarding the car's long-term wear and tear.
|
 |
Positive: @Trailboss commented positively on the Bronco, describing it as a nice vehicle that isn't over the top, which reflects a favorable impression. @sperossa, the seller, shared personal anecdotes about the Bronco, emphasizing it was a restore project shared with his son and fondly noted that it had been garage kept and enjoyable for family outings. He reassured potential buyers about the Bronco's AC functionality, stating it blows cold and is fully operational after being charged, positive elements that would instill confidence in its maintenance and overall condition.
Neutral: @Moparguitar raised inquiries about the specifics of the vehicle, including the cold AC and the inclusion of the hardtop and full doors for transport. @karbonbased asked about the Bronco’s driving capabilities on highways and whether it would be suitable to drive it home. These questions indicate a typical buyer's interest in the vehicle’s usability and readiness for immediate use without revealing much sentiment.
Negative: @Moparguitar also sought clarification on potential damage, indicating an awareness of common issues older vehicles could have. @NHICK expressed concerns regarding rust, particularly given the vehicle's age and climate implications, which suggests he is evaluating the quality carefully; he mentions needing assurance that there are no significant underlying problems. @sperossa has attempted to address these concerns by stating he hasn't noticed any rust and explaining the condition of the doors, but the inquiries highlight hesitation and doubt about the vehicle's overall robustness.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle for its beautiful condition, with @PDXBryan noting what a well-maintained car it appears to be, deserving kudos to its previous owner. @Fastrack325 also expressed appreciation for the E30 model, specifically highlighting its unique engine design. The seller, @AngelsMotors, emphasizes the car's renowned status as a "Legendary and Iconic BMW 325 E30", noting its immaculate condition, quality repaint, and rare interior, which adds to its appeal. The seller also encourages potential buyers, indicating confidence in the vehicle's maintenance history.
Neutral: Discussion around the vehicle's specifics showed a mix of interest and curiosity. @Fastrack325 inquired about the timing belt and its replacement records, while another commenter, @Ocoanater, questioned the installation of euro bumpers and their impact on value. @AngelsMotors addressed inquiries regarding the speedometer's functionality, confirming that it works but may need adjustment, reflecting a willingness to provide detailed information to bidders. Additionally, the seller maintained transparency about the vehicle's usage history and maintenance, including oil changes and tire refurbishments, providing potential buyers with important context.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's history and condition emerged from certain commenters. @RedTractor highlighted that the car had remained unused since 2019, prompting questions about mechanical refreshment besides the cosmetic updates. @Ocoanater raised a valid point regarding the accuracy of the gauge cluster, indicating a potential need for further adjustments. A heated dispute broke out involving @69classix and @Ocoanater, suggesting that some comments may have caused tension and potential disruption to the auction process, distracting from the positive aspects of the vehicle and creating a less favorable impression.
|
 |
Positive: @Airliner1 praises the rarity and desirability of the 997 S and 4S models, emphasizing that these vehicles in such condition and mileage represent an opportunity not to be missed. @GDogg enthusiastically comments on the quality of the C4S Coupe. @Garciacar shares a compliment, describing the car as nice, while @monts calls it beautiful and raises questions about compliance with California SMOG and the availability of a car seat.
Neutral: @PorschePhi1 brings up a practical consideration regarding interior color choices for resale value, asking the community whether a black interior would be preferable to tan. @Oatwilli shares an opinion, stating that the black interior looks spectacular. @CMORG presents standard inquiries for the seller about the car's condition and requests recent inspection and service reports, as well as driving videos.
Negative: @mwesselhoft, the seller, acknowledges a delay in response and addresses various questions, mentioning some minor issues with the rearview mirror. @some_dude expresses a preference for an inside driving video, while @Squashboy insists on needing a recent borescope inspection before bidding, highlighting past experiences. @Skiroy echoes this sentiment, urging for maintenance records, while another commenter argues that at the price point, the seller should be concerned about the borescope, as it will impact final bids.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm about the vehicle's wheels, highlighting their aesthetic appeal. @MMMMM describes them as arguably some of the most beautiful wheels BMW ever made, noting their ability to enhance the sportsmanship of the E39 chassis. Similarly, @Richard reflects on his long history with these wheels, calling them the coolest he's ever encountered since he first saw them in 1983. Such sentiments underline the wheels' status as a classic choice for vintage BMW enthusiasts.
Neutral: The seller, @frenchfelgen, provides detailed information about shipping options, indicating a flat rate of $890 for UPS expedited shipping to any US or Canada address, and clarifying that the buyer can arrange their own shipping if preferred. The seller also shares insights about the refurbishment process carried out on the wheels, noting the quality of work done, including polishing and clearcoating the various components, all of which was done for a total of approximately $1,364 USD.
Negative: While the comments are largely positive, there is an underlying concern about shipping costs, as seen in the inquiries from commenters like @etip and @shea. Both express curiosity about the shipping fees to their respective locations in Seattle and California, which suggests that the high shipping rate may deter potential buyers. However, this concern has been addressed by the seller who has laid out the terms of payment and the potential for additional customs duties, yet the shipping cost itself might be a sticking point for some customers.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg and @Gmmuscleusa both praised the color of the wrap, calling it awesome and eye-catching. @Gdaddy shared a positive experience, mentioning how the vehicle's presence on the road is impressive, especially during adverse weather conditions. @Justyle, the seller, noted that the car gets a lot of attention, particularly from children who refer to it as a 'Monster Jam truck'. This interest has been so significant that the vehicle was even featured in a music video, further highlighting its appeal.
Neutral: @mtaa brought up concerns regarding the vehicle's high mileage and previous accidents but suggested it might still be a good opportunity. @Msobczyk and @Leut_dan asked the seller for more details about the damages and the condition of the paint underneath the wrap. @wrassemeister and @Jujumax inquired about specifics regarding the exhaust system and the authenticity of the 4x4 model, indicating a shared interest in the technical aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: @mtaa expressed concerns over the car's multiple accidents and high mileage, indicating skepticism about the vehicle’s value. @12trey4 questioned whether the truck was previously a rental on Turo, hinting at potential issues related to the vehicle's history. Additionally, there was concern raised about the status of an A/C leak, suggesting there may be underlying maintenance issues that could affect the vehicle's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commentators expressed enthusiasm for the overall aesthetic and mechanical quality of the Barracuda. @Jimmy55 praised its excellent condition, calling it one of the most impressive muscle cars ever made. @GonnaNeedaBiggerTrailer excitedly shared personal memories related to the car, highlighting the impressive modifications like welded frame connectors and improved suspension. Additionally, the color was a point of admiration, with comments indicating that the 'Plum Crazy' or 'In-Violet' hue is appealing to the car's character.
Neutral: Some neutral comments centered around discussions of the car's modifications and history. Commentators like @KRBaird noted the change from a 318 engine to a 440 block, questioning how this affects authenticity. Others, like @carfan1978 and @MrBeanCar, shared mixed feelings about performance versus original charm, indicating that while the car looks great, some purists might find the changes regrettable. Overall, the comments reflect a range of opinions on modifications while recognizing the car's appeal.
Negative: Negative comments focused on concerns about the vehicle's modifications and functionality. @thebuick pointed out that after extensive body work, the backup lights were not operational, which raised questions about overall reliability. Concerns were also voiced by @Journeymanlineman about the inoperative amp meter, with skepticism about other undisclosed issues. @midwestfordman commented on the quality of parts used, noting that for the price, certain details—like appropriate U bolts—should have been better addressed, hinting at a lack of attention to detail.
|
 |
Positive: @Boyhowdee describes the vehicle affectionately as a "honey." @13VT praises the Royal Gray color as great, while @CRUSH likens driving it to the experience of driving an adult go-kart, emphasizing its enjoyment and fun. @maw06 reinforces this sentiment, sharing their long-term satisfaction with their 2005 Cooper S, highlighting its acceleration, maneuverability, and comfortable seats. @NickW1 notes the vehicle's impressive paint condition, stating it must not have seen many highway miles, and @BrandonOsburn mentions it delivers a motorcycle-like feeling with four wheels, expressing regret over selling two in the past.
Neutral: @iakllc (The Seller) confirms the vehicle is in great condition, mentioning that it was inspected and serviced in September of this year. They acknowledge the absence of a detailed service history in Carfax but assure potential buyers of the vehicle's excellent maintenance. @NjBuyer inquires about the service record and a known recall, to which @iakllc (The Seller) responds, assuring that no known issues exist and that they can address the recall with local dealers if necessary. @rg25 expresses excitement over the potential selling price, noting similar listings around $12k.
Negative: @MartinGardens shares a cautionary tale about their own Mini experience, detailing an unfortunate engine failure due to a common maintenance issue that led to significant damage and the vehicle being parted out. This anecdote serves as a warning of what can happen if maintenance isn’t closely monitored. @tungsten reflects on a personal regret regarding the color options available when ordering their R53, suggesting a level of disappointment in the vehicle configuration that some buyers might resonate with. Overall, concerns about maintenance needs, recalling issues, and past breakdowns present a cautionary note for potential owners.
|
 |
Positive: @wtornado praised the vehicle with a simple yet impactful 'Well done!!!', while @CPCDJO described it as a 'Nice looking GMC'. @GDogg remarked it as 'probably the best looking close to original GMC 100' they've seen in a while, calling it 'Absolutely stunning'. @Vtec4ever appreciated the all-original look, stating that 'This thing will last forever and you can work on it yourself'. @Mike1959 acknowledged the nice upgrades and commended the quality of work. @AcornMustang also expressed admiration, calling the restoration 'Fantastic' and 'Absolutely stunning'. Overall, many comments reflect admiration for the vehicle's appearance and quality of restoration.
Neutral: @Worldclassmotorcars, the seller, provided context about the vehicle's history and condition, stating that it belongs to their friends who bought it unfinished in 1998. They mentioned that extensive restoration work had been completed with receipts available. The seller also confirmed that the truck runs and drives well, mentioning the recent upgrades, including disc brakes, and offered to assist with shipping if the auction is won. @Legm4 and @CPCDJO inquired about the running gear and chassis condition while showing interest in the vehicle’s operational specifics, such as starting and idling smoothly. @ehb86 provided insights on the engine's oil pressure system based on the vehicle's model year, indicating a favorable assumption of full oil pressure.
Negative: A few comments highlighted concerns, including @CPCDJO's inquiry about a startup and driving video, expressing that it would be helpful for potential buyers. @Mike1959 noted a missing oil cap after closely inspecting pictures, which raised a point of concern about minor details. @Legm4 asked about the condition of the running gear and whether the paint quality met expectations, suggesting that buyers may have reservations regarding comprehensive details of the vehicle's condition. Despite these concerns, they did not overshadow the general positive feedback regarding the vehicle's restoration and appearance.
|
 |
Positive: @patrickquade expresses regret over selling his 96 4 Runner, admiring its capability, and showing interest in the current model, hinting at its impressive performance. @Bchxuss69 shares a nostalgic sentiment for 90's Toyotas, highlighting a fondness for their design and build quality that seems to have diminished in more modern vehicles. @EthLong, the seller, enthusiastically describes the Land Cruiser Prado as one of his favorites, emphasizing its readiness for new adventures, and encourages potential bidders to ask questions regarding the vehicle.
Neutral: @StaleCrust inquires about the model transmission present in the vehicle, reflecting a technical curiosity without expressing any strong opinion. @KamilHooniverse poses a detailed series of questions regarding maintenance performed since importation, including inquiries about fluid changes and the operability of features such as windows and AC, showing an analytical approach to the vehicle's condition.
Negative: While there are no strongly negative comments, @KamilHooniverse's inquiries regarding maintenance and the uncertainty about the age of the lower ball joints indicate some concerns that potential buyers might have regarding the vehicle's longevity and maintenance history. Overall, the comments reflect a mix of interest and curiosity about the vehicle rather than outright negative feedback.
|
 |
Positive: The 1973 Pontiac Grand Safari Wagon is receiving a lot of admiration for its beautiful condition and unique features. @BDAS, the seller, has highlighted that it has been part of a private collection for over two decades, with only 45,300 original miles. Commenters like @AllUsernamesTaken described it as a "beautiful wagon," while @Jimmyblues1959 noted its outstanding shape given its age, despite some minor imperfections. The power clamshell tailgate and Borla exhaust also seem to be popular talking points among enthusiasts, with commenters such as @whcheney reminiscing about their experiences with similar vehicles.
Neutral: There has been significant discussion around the recent bidding activity for the vehicle, particularly the surprising jump in bid value from $2k to $90k. Many commenters expressed surprise and confusion regarding the bid, with @Greg1029 and @Fury1 questioning the legitimacy and rationale behind such a high price. Others reminisced about their own memories related to the model, like @jrcrawford4 recalling the challenges of learning to drive in a similar car, which added a personal touch to the auction discussions.
Negative: On the flip side, there was skepticism among some users regarding the high bid. @littlehandegan expressed embarrassment over accidentally placing a bid with an extra zero, while @OldGuy remarked disappointment that the $90k bid wasn't legitimate, suggesting that its rarity justified the price. Comments like @Joe_Macheck's hint at heavy drinking at auctions indicate a belief that the bidding process might have gotten out of hand, further fueling doubts about the current auction dynamics.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the car, with @Daybreak calling it a "Nice 64 Polara" and @Huskerman (The Seller) providing enthusiastic details about its features, including the disc brakes and easy starting with the Edelbrock carb. Enthusiasts like @matt178 and @boaboyoz are excited about the car's restoration quality and finishes. The car is noted for its clean condition and lack of rust, which @Huskerman (The Seller) confirms, stating there are very few old Dodges in such good shape. Several commenters, like @Richard, appreciate the technical aspects, especially regarding the braking system and the unique features, including the Gear Vendors overdrive system.
Neutral: Several questions arise from the community regarding additional information on the vehicle's history and technical specifications. @Richard and @777plt engage in discussions about the brake setup, while @mikes440 requests more details on the extent of the restoration work and any potential rust issues. @Steyrbob and @Huskerman (The Seller) also exchange comments about photos showing the bodywork. @Huskerman (The Seller) mentions that he has the original dyno sheets and restoration pictures, adding valuable context for potential buyers. There is a mutual agreement on the importance of having videos to showcase the car's performance, with @Daybreak emphasizing the need for firsthand information about the car's driving characteristics as well.
Negative: A few negative concerns have been raised in the comments. @hucklebury points out that some photos reveal potentially problematic issues, such as bent shackles next to the exhaust and a chewed-up rotor that could indicate either a stuck caliper or worn brakes. This has led to questions about the overall maintenance and current condition of critical components. Additionally, @matt178 inquires about the auction reserve, hinting at possible skepticism towards the vehicle's valuation if it doesn't meet expectations. Overall, while many express their admiration and excitement, a handful of comments reflect worries that could impact potential buyers' decision-making.
|
 |
Positive: @TSMiller expresses a strong appreciation for the 2020 Range Rover, describing it as a 'fine, fine vehicle' that excels in various aspects like transporting people and luggage. He highlights its performance on long road trips, indicating that it is a reliable choice for extended journeys, and he mentions a decision to keep it longer due to its quality. @dunlapimports, the seller, acknowledges and thanks @TSMiller for the positive feedback about the vehicle.
Neutral: @rogerquad brings up a concern regarding the number of oil changes on the vehicle, noting that only having two since new is somewhat unsettling given the high-performance nature of the motor. This comment points to a potential issue that may warrant further investigation by prospective buyers, but it does not directly critique the overall quality or performance of the vehicle.
Negative: @dunlapimports (The Seller) addresses @rogerquad's comment by suggesting that the lack of oil change records could be due to not all dealers reporting to Carfax, implying that the vehicle is in 'mint shape.' Additionally, @dunlapimports emphasizes that there has been no paint work done and comments on the car's excellent cooling system, which may counter concerns but does not directly respond to the underlying worry about maintenance.
|
|
|