Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
![]() |
Positive: Many enthusiasts express their admiration for the GTC4Lusso V12, highlighting its beautiful design and superior performance. @boaboyoz describes the car's arrival as a wonderful way to start the day, calling it a gorgeous vehicle. @cocomats appreciates the unique 'Shooting Brake' vibe and imagines an even more luxurious version with added doors. The powerful N/A 6.3-liter V12 engine and 680hp are praised by @BlackdogPerformanceCars, who emphasizes the car's ability to comfortably seat a family of four while offering an exhilarating driving experience. @Dollycat3 also shares the sentiment, calling the car absolutely gorgeous and stunning. Enthusiasts even comment on the car's practicality, with @Ksdaoski27 calling it a great daily driver.
Neutral: Some comments focus on the practicality and usability of the vehicle, with comments about its storage capacity and seating options. @halfplus7 shares his positive experience using the back seats and trunk, while @SlowNRusty humorously suggests the car as a practical option for everyday trips. However, the conversation also shifts to technical aspects, such as the mention of the power takeoff unit (PTU) and the associated costs of repairs, which several users discussed without strong feelings either way. @lintakoc inquires about the panoramic roof option, showcasing that potential buyers are interested in specific features, while @VolvoguyKC refers to the car as art, indicating admiration for its design rather than its performance alone.
Negative: On the flip side, there are notable concerns regarding the vehicle's reliability, especially relating to the power takeoff unit. @agorka expresses his disinterest based on the high costs associated with PTU replacements, which he finds difficult to swallow. @shamansky shares similar thoughts, reflecting on his past experiences with Ferraris and the costly repairs he faced. The design of the car also receives mixed reviews; @Wjhpc questions the car's aesthetic, referring to it as a 'bread truck,' while others engage in discussions about its appeal, indicating that not everyone is a fan of its looks. Overall, these concerns highlight some reservations among potential buyers regarding maintenance and design.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its stunning appearance and unique features. @M3rryChristmas called it a "gem," while @Scott_in_FL described it as deserving a high auction price due to its beauty. @AutoCan mentioned finally driving a fifth-gen Viper and being impressed, while @valleyman19 expressed admiration for the iconic orange color, implying it is a favorite among Viper enthusiasts. Additionally, comments from @9literviper and @AZ911 highlighted the seller's credibility and the vehicle's well-maintained state, encouraging potential bidders to bid with confidence.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on specific features and history of the vehicle. @emanon_23 inquired about the exhaust system, specifically whether it contained high flow cats and if the original exhaust components were included in the sale. @acrsnk asked about the availability of original paperwork and the car cover, to which the seller responded with details about included manuals but noted the lack of the original cover. @TMR3 and @dnaert raised questions about the car's condition and specific factory options like sill plates, demonstrating interest in the car's specifications.
Negative: A small number of comments highlighted concerns regarding the vehicle's modifications and history. @Sneakypete99 wanted assurance that relevant recalls had been addressed, while @TMR3 requested evidence of pre-refurbishment paintwork. Similarly, @dnaert pointed out an absence of a factory door sill plate, which the seller disputed by clarifying factory options. While these comments did not deter overall interest, they indicated a need for transparency about the vehicle's condition and modifications to encourage informed bidding.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle's unique color combination and impressive craftsmanship. @dj_walls2424 praised the color scheme, while @Cdn043 highlighted its high quality, featuring a BluePrint engine, Holley Sniper EFI, and Tremec TKO600 gearbox. The seller, @asphaltjeff, described the car as a fun, visceral experience, emphasizing its performance capabilities and the joy it brings to driving. Owners noted the meticulous build process, with @asphaltjeff sharing that it served as a family project where his kids learned valuable skills.
Neutral: Comments have acknowledged the time since the vehicle was built, with @EMSA1stSon noting that it has been four years with barely any mileage. Some users appreciated the seller's willingness to share details about the car, with @3.1L_Z asking for clarification about the engine. The seller responded positively, showing transparency about the build and providing additional information about the engine's specifications. The general atmosphere among commenters remains engaged and curious about the vehicle's properties and history.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle being underused and not experiencing the enjoyment it deserves, with @EMSA1stSon voicing that these types of cars should be driven more frequently. Additionally, @John_ford mentioned the risk of the car being misused as a daily driver in an unsuitable environment like Manhattan, which speaks to a broader concern about ensuring this classic vehicle finds an appropriate caretaker who can appreciate its heritage and performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the 1967 Toyota Corona, with many users reminiscing about their own experiences or the significance of the vehicle in automotive history. For instance, @schigh and @Catharine highlight how this model marked a pivotal shift for Toyota in the U.S., encouraging others to switch from domestic brands. @Dollycat3 commended the car's design and reliability, pointing out that it was tailored for American tastes with features that appealed to buyers, while @traveler501 recalled fond memories driving a similar model, further underscoring the Corona's nostalgic value. Additionally, the comments celebrate the car's classic status, noting its importance in establishing Toyota's foothold in the American market.
Neutral: Several comments contain queries and clarifications about the car's condition and features, such as @rohrlouie asking about the paintwork and transmission status and @Uby67vw1958 inquiring about original mileage. Others, like @davbert55, expressed interest in the car's operational readiness, while @hockeyhose10 sought information regarding its Planned Non-Operation (PNO) title status. The seller, @Chapter2, provided detailed and informative responses about the vehicle's specifications, previous history, and current operational state, facilitating a clearer understanding for potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the overall positivity, there are minor concerns raised by some commenters, notably @Brownd3max questioning aspects like potential tailpipe smoke and the durability of the shocks, while @geogth pointed out the challenges of locating replacement parts. Few mentioned issues like the non-operational trunk lock and the need for new interior carpet, suggesting that while the Corona is in great shape, it may require some repairs or maintenance to restore it fully. These comments indicate a desire for transparency regarding the car's condition, balancing the enthusiastic sentiments with necessary caution.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Thatsagreatride loves the vehicle, referring to it as a "great ride". @Hoppy18 humorously acknowledges this sentiment, suggesting that simply saying hello in an auction implies the same appreciation. @2002WS6 and @Jeffolson share positive memories about their own Supra experiences, indicating admiration for the model's reliability and performance. @suprarossa appreciates the car's hardtop feature and color, noting that it's a standout example. Likewise, @Fstcoup admiringly comments that it’s a nice car, while @Twoturtles expresses that it feels like an honest car with an honest presentation.
Neutral: The vehicle has raised several questions from potential buyers, including inquiries about the condition of various components such as the power steering and heater fan operation. @Twoturtles has requested close-up pictures of specific areas, demonstrating a cautious yet interested approach to the vehicle's condition. The seller, @Classicroxbury, responds to these inquiries by providing details about the minor power steering leak and the operational status of the heater and AC, showing transparency in communication. The presence of mixed tire brands and age raises concerns but is acknowledged by potential buyers as a simple issue that could be fixed without major complications.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and current issues. @Fstcoup criticizes the lack of care for regular maintenance items, suggesting that issues like dated tires and a leaking power steering system could significantly lower the vehicle's value. Additionally, @onlyhonda4me expresses disappointment about the car lacking a manual transmission, noting that it causes them "actual pain". @dmose seeks clarification on past work done on the car, indicating suspicion about the quality of recent repairs, while @Twoturtles queries about heat controls and electrical functions, reinforcing the need for a thorough inspection.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments about the XK120 emphasize its beauty and allure, with multiple users praising its aesthetics and the meticulous refurbishment it has undergone. @overlandish expressed how reading 'The Last Open Road' has deepened their appreciation for the XK120. @PAEnglish11 and @tomjack commended the car's stunning presentation and charming paint color, respectively. @Vtec4ever simply exclaimed how the vehicle is a real looker, while @lowfathustle highlighted the love, patience, and dollars invested in the car. @Wob (The Seller) shared their sentimental love for these classic beauties, stating the car is gorgeous and fun to drive, inviting potential bidders to engage enthusiastically.
Neutral: Some comments provided useful context regarding the car's value and characteristics, with @Bordeaux indicating potential concerns about the lack of a Heritage Certificate, which is often missing for various reasons. @MNberg shared insights from personal experience, noting that despite some challenges with legroom, tweaks can significantly enhance driving enjoyment. @Wob (The Seller) maintained an informative approach, addressing questions about inspections, bidding processes, and the importance of ongoing communication with bidders throughout the auction. Additionally, @tomjack sought more specific details about the paint color, indicating a genuine interest in the vehicle's authenticity.
Negative: However, not all comments were entirely positive. @PathDoc mentioned the car's lack of a Heritage Certificate, questioning the potential impact this might have on its value. @BB510 raised a concern about the car's stance, questioning if it was lowered at the front. @MNberg highlighted previous experiences with classic Jaguars that were visually appealing but lacked driving comfort until modifications were made. This suggests that while the XK120 is celebrated for its looks, some users express reservations about practical aspects such as driving performance and authenticity, raising important considerations for potential buyers.
![]() |
Ex–Mille Miglia Storica 1952 Cisitalia 202 SC Gran Sport Cabriolet by Stabilimenti Farina
183SC
Lot 216362
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: The Cisitalia 202 SC has received overwhelming praise from multiple commenters. @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as 'absolutely fabulous, super rare, and really, really good looking.' The Seller, @OTSandCo, highlights the history of the car, noting its participation in the prestigious Mille Miglia and its successful restoration, making it a 'benchmark of design and performance.' Enthusiastic comments like 'bellissima' from @GDogg and 'wonderful, beautiful, and stunning' from @austin_alfa emphasize the car's aesthetic appeal and artistry, which many commenters agree is unique to Italian craftsmanship.
Neutral: Some commenters have taken a more neutral stance, asking practical questions about the vehicle's history and specifications. @Italia_227 queries the lack of known history from 1952 to the 2010s, while @Martin_480_Turbo requests information on the original color and trim. @sg_reno expresses curiosity about the production circumstances during the car's manufacturing era, suggesting an intriguing yet uncertain backdrop to its history. These inquiries showcase a blend of appreciation for the car's design and the desire for more detailed information about its past and authenticity.
Negative: Conversely, there are a few critical remarks regarding the vehicle. @justinstephen humorously suggests an impractical modification to the car's exhaust system, while @5gearsinreverse draws a comparison to a Nissan Figaro, which could be interpreted as diminishing the Cisitalia's esteemed reputation. This sentiment is met with a rebuttal from @JGB, who reminds them of the Cisitalia's legacy, leading to a brief discussion about automotive design lineage. Overall, these comments indicate a mix of playful skepticism and respect for the vehicle's significance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and quality, with @Jim_Liberty highlighting its beautiful design. @Hoppy18 commended the seller's representation of the vehicle, referring to it as a testament to their reputation on BaT. Additionally, @rcrowder praised the seller's responsiveness and customer service, stating that they set a high standard in the industry. The car was characterized as a "cool car for the money" by the seller, suggesting enthusiasm about its value.
Neutral: Several questions were raised about the car's features and condition. @BobSoCal inquired about the year the car was built, while @Krazyoneis sought confirmation about the paint condition and potential rock chips. @barryz_ asked about the condition of the air conditioning and noticed a possible issue in the pictures, prompting queries about the vehicle's running temperature. There was also interest in seeing videos of the car in operation, with comments indicating a desire for a cold start and driving demonstrations.
Negative: There were concerns regarding the vehicle's physical condition, particularly about the front hood area. @Velocett noted shattering on the fiberglass, while @Civilguy pointed out a worrying issue with the hinge hardware in the pictures, presuming damage that wasn't evident in previous sales. @barryz_ requested better images of this damage. The seller assured everyone that the problematic areas would be addressed and repaired, showing a willingness to ensure the vehicle meets buyer expectations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Multiple comments praise the vehicle's unique modifications and historical significance. @Rrauh highlights an impressive backstory regarding the vehicle's discovery in 1963, noting it as a remarkable find in a cornfield. Commenters like @Leif_in_Calif and @Highlander63 appreciate the car's aesthetic, with one stating it is a 'great looking Model A,' and suggesting it serves as a delightful and pure driving experience. @ocorky (The Seller) reassures participants about the car's functionality by mentioning that it runs and drives well, and he commits to providing a driving video for prospective buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions about the vehicle's condition and particulars. @Woodland66 inquires about the car's maintenance needs, including potential issues with the radiator and gauges, while @Davey_Jones emphasizes the necessity of a video to assess its operational status. @ebp3120 and @KnoxTime raise questions about the vehicle's registration and plate status, indicating it might affect the buyer's obligations upon purchase. @ModelAkid and others mention specific details about the model that could influence its value based on restoration and authenticity, like the presence of certain aftermarket parts.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition are voiced by several participants. @Woodland66 raises possible red flags, such as paint cracking which may suggest extensive bodywork, and mentions a leaking head gasket. @ModelAkid notes discrepancies regarding the carburetor and the car's VIN, while another commenter questions the presence of necessary items like tools and window curtains, indicating potential neglect. Overall, comments reflect a cautious approach toward the vehicle's sale due to uncertainties regarding its operational history and potential restoration needs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mynameistimo expressed a strong admiration for the Land Cruiser Heritage Edition, referring to it as a dream vehicle that represents a perfect balance of family utility with zero compromises. @rogerfoxtrot998 described the vehicle as "very clean" without modifications, underscoring its appeal as a well-maintained example of the model. @BuckNasty also recognized the vehicle's value, indicating that it is a gem, echoing the sentiments of others who have highlighted its impressive qualities and ownership experience.
Neutral: @mikebaumtx (The Seller) provided a clear overview of the vehicle's condition, mentioning that it has 32,000 miles and addressing questions about the passenger side headlight, which he indicated has scratches but no cracks or moisture issues present. There were discussions among commentors about the market dynamics of the Land Cruiser, with @bordercollie_piper wondering if these vehicles are primarily for driving or investment and @steveishorse adding that low-mileage examples are often secondary vehicles for collectors. @Jettedlag also noted the correlation of pricing between different models, highlighting how the Land Cruiser brand affects auction values.
Negative: While the general sentiment about the Land Cruiser Heritage Edition is positive, some comments do hint at caution. @mens_reaM5 questioned if the scratches could be attributed to flaws in the PPF film applied to the headlights, illustrating a concern about the condition of the vehicle. @driven4more expressed a feeling of despair about the high bids for the vehicle, indicating a desire to own one but recognizing the financial hurdles involved. Overall, while there are minor concerns about the vehicle's aesthetics, the overall feedback is overwhelmingly favorable.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express interest in the vehicle's features and aesthetics, with @Yooooooo specifically praising the wheels. @vcswm0 is eager to see more visual evidence of the car's performance, suggesting that a driving video would enhance the buying experience.
Neutral: Some questions focus on the functionality and condition of the vehicle's components. @sf101 inquires about whether all accessories, including headlight wipers and cruise control, are functional, and @TheDudeAbides2 asks about the cost to rebuild the hydraulics for the convertible top, indicating a concern for maintenance and long-term ownership costs.
Negative: Several commenters raise concerns about the car's cleanliness and condition. @NESTIUS questions the origin of a black residue on the carpet and mentions issues with the leather, suggesting it may have been poorly cleaned. In response, @Scottsdalecarefree (The Seller) defends the condition of the interior, claiming the spots are from the car's previous ownership and not due to aggressive cleaning.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the car for its stunning appearance and rarity, highlighting that the Porsche 928 GTS is not just any 928 but one of only 16 manual versions produced that year. @motrac (The Seller) emphasized the quality of the car, mentioning the recent restoration and compliance with California emissions standards, which is a significant advantage for local buyers. Enthusiasts like @rpstephen944 remarked on the car's beauty and high value, indicating strong interest and confidence in the bidding process according to the car's rarity and condition. The clean look and recent service were also frequently noted, with buyers expressing excitement about previewing the car.
Neutral: There were various inquiries regarding the specifics of the car, particularly about the leak-down test results. @MSQ asked for numerical details about the leak from the piston rings, indicating a desire for more information about the car's mechanical state. Additionally, @Teutonic provided detailed historical context about the car's model year and production, which sparked discussion among car collectors about its authenticity. @Ried questioned whether the new auction listing had a reserve, with @GLTL confirming that it indeed does, indicating that many participants seek clarity on auction terms.
Negative: Some comments expressed skepticism regarding the car's price, notably from @steelejay, who questioned whether the $100K+ asking price was justified, and indicated that the car might not be worth that much despite its impressive features. @VolvoguyKC acknowledged the potential for price fluctuation, suggesting it still had a long way to go in the auction process. Concerns about the previous auction not meeting the reserve also highlighted a sense of uncertainty surrounding the sale, with questions about the car's long-term desirability echoing through discussions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz praises the vehicle as a "groovy Grabber Blue (!) Belgian Pantera" with a "fabulous build" and expresses excitement to see it. @Verdigris remarks on the improved quality control of the L model and calls the car very cool. @1889 compliments the car’s restoration, mentioning that it is nicely done without being overdone and highlights that the seller is reputable, saying it should do very well. @christophernkennedy admires the Pantera's appearance and asks about the air conditioning. @111r appreciates the car's early bumperettes, suggesting its U.S. origin might reduce import duties.
Neutral: @speed8classics (The Seller) provides potential buyers with detailed shipping costs for various U.S. destinations, covering both combined and single container options. @cal-dmn inquires about the Marti report for the car while showing interest in its original color and parts. @E911 mentions purchasing a vehicle from the seller before and had a good experience with shipping. Additionally, @Dphotos expresses a desire for driving videos focusing on engine sounds rather than commentary.
Negative: @kevinckb6 raises concerns about additional costs beyond the sale price due to tariff confusion and shipping fees, while @DFWcarandtoymuseum shares experiences of high unforeseen costs when importing vehicles from Europe. @CAL-DMN criticizes the seller for not having complete documentation about the car's history, feeling it leaves potential buyers vulnerable. Lastly, @solidlifters expresses interest in the vehicle but is put off by the shipping ordeal involved in bringing it to the U.S.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, noting it as a stunning example of the foxbody Cobra with one mentioning it as the best color for this model. @Z282SLO complimented the car, highlighting its nearly all-original state and sharp appearance. @oldguy75 praised the quality of the pictures, remarking on how they are driving great bidding early in the auction, further emphasizing that this is a great example of the model.
Neutral: The vehicle's details were discussed in a constructive manner. @Z282SLO inquired about the engine build date and requested additional engine pictures for a clearer view of the rare smooth intake. @idrivemine questioned whether the tailpipes were aftermarket and requested pictures of the mufflers to clarify. @Cobra3928 pointed out that the CD player may be from a newer model, sparking a dialogue about the vehicle's original features and components.
Negative: No significant negative comments were recorded about the vehicle. Instead, discussions focused on minor details regarding the authenticity and appearance of the car's features. @idrivemine's inquiry about the mufflers hints at some uncertainty about the modifications, but it was presented in a neutral tone without any outright negativity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ThejudgeRoy praised the car for its exceptional design and unique color. @jonwball777 expressed satisfaction with his own SLS AMG, highlighting it as an incredible supercar that continually provides joy. @boaboyoz also shared excitement about the vehicle, labeling it as gorgeous and wishing good luck to the seller. Additionally, @Mansi found the car to be a timeless investment that provides great enjoyment, echoing @kruseholdings’ experience of using his SLS as a daily driver for fun trips.
Neutral: Several commentors, including @Autobiotic, have asked detailed questions about the car's service history, paintwork, and other specifications, indicating a desire for more information. @DIAMOND2025 (The Seller) responded that the car is all original with no paintwork, confirming that service records are minimal but that the car runs and drives perfectly. @Gasman01 noted the unanswered questions about the vehicle details, and @mayart expressed concerns over potential expensive DCT repairs while seeking feedback from fellow owners.
Negative: While many comments were positive, concerns were raised about the car's transmission, particularly regarding the DCT system's reliability. @mayart voiced apprehensions over the costly repairs that can arise, specifically citing stories about repairs costing around $30,000. @kruseholdings acknowledged having a new transmission at 30,000 miles but mentioned it was covered under warranty, while noting the associated costs of maintenance to prevent failures.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The seller, @scotwil, has been responsive to inquiries regarding the vehicle. They provided clear answers to questions about the oil leak, acknowledging the source of the leak as the valve cover, which shows a level of transparency in communication.
Neutral: Comments from @ImTheDoctor highlight concerns about the vehicle's ability to meet California emissions standards, particularly whether it retains all necessary smog equipment. @Shakedaddy1's inquiry about the condition of the carpet and floorboards indicates a desire for more detailed visual information about the vehicle's interior, suggesting that potential buyers may be looking for reassurance regarding the overall condition of the vehicle.
Negative: @ImTheDoctor's repeated questions about the oil leak and emissions suggest some skepticism about the vehicle's reliability, while @scotwil's admission that the vehicle likely does not comply with California emissions regulations could deter potential buyers in that state. The concerns voiced by @Shakedaddy1 regarding the carpet and floorboards could also imply that there may be issues with the vehicle's interior that need addressing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Super7Driver finds it amazing that the 2CV was still in production in 1988 and wishes good luck to potential buyers. @Biscotte57, a seasoned Citroën collector, praises the vehicle as a nice find and encourages passionate Citroën enthusiasts to consider it. @CPT_5LOW expresses a desire to see the car in local car meets and appreciates the joy the seller has experienced with it. @VintageGuy76 shares a nostalgic and positive memory of traveling in a 2CV and states this particular one looks like a good deal, indicating it’s an impressive machine. Additionally, @CapitalImports (The Seller) shares that owning the car has been a nostalgic experience, especially recalling his youth in Argentina.
Neutral: @JoeP inquires about the upholstery material, to which @CapitalImports (The Seller) confirms it is cloth. @Frank_Barrett asks about the chassis and spare wheel, and @CapitalImports responds regarding the vehicle's condition and features. @kling.klang comments on the car's potential Japanese export connections, indicating a blend of curiosity. @rocki327 analyzes the car’s features in relation to specific market builds, presenting an analytical take on its history. @JeffreyFl inquires about the availability of the first grille and service records, seeking additional information.
Negative: There are few negative comments specifically targeting the vehicle, but @rocki327 highlights some inconsistencies in the features relevant to the market it was built for, implying it may not fully meet certain expectations. While @kling.klang notes the confusion with after-market specifics, the tone remains more inquisitive than outright critical. The overall atmosphere is quite positive and nostalgic, with only a hint of skepticism regarding the car's specifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @wellisntthisfun commented on the car's beauty and appreciated the addition of LED headlights. @Judgejohn (The Seller) highlighted the unique specifications of the car, including the metal sunroof and the custom gloss black badging, which he preferred over the original silver lettering. He also expressed satisfaction with the service he received from Isringhausen, indicating a positive purchasing experience and a recommendation for others looking for a Porsche.
Neutral: @Judgejohn (The Seller) provided detailed answers to inquiries regarding the car's specifications and condition, such as confirming the presence of PPF on the front end and side mirrors. He noted there was no front lift and mentioned the original suspension. He also clarified some concerns about the car's appearance, stating that what appeared to be blemishes in photos were just dust and confirmed two known minor imperfections that had been professionally repaired.
Negative: @Cags825 raised concerns about potential blemishes in the paint based on the provided images, and @pdotnet expressed worries about the car's clearance for their driveway, indicating a need for further reassurance regarding its suitability. Additionally, @Best_Of_Show warned bidders about the unpredictable nature of auction bidding, suggesting skepticism about the final sale price.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @motroman described the car as beautiful, emphasizing how it looks to be in great shape. @mkekiddoc praised its appearance and suggested that the use of higher-end tires indicates elevated care for the vehicle. @SlowNRusty humorously noted the passion of the owner, comparing the car's importance to that of a family dog. @1988BMWM6 (The Seller) confirmed that the original SLS suspension is in place and was replaced fifteen years ago, indicating the car's well-maintained condition.
Neutral: @999RX inquired about the silver cover on the B-pillar/door jamb, indicating curiosity rather than criticism. @RQ58 asked for additional images of the underside of the car and a Carfax report, as well as clarification regarding a dent noted in a previous photo. @wem5310 requested information about the vehicle's functionality, questioning if features like the air conditioning and windows work properly, as well as the condition of the dashboard.
Negative: While the overall sentiment was mostly positive, there were some concerns raised regarding the specifics of the car's condition. @RQ58 brought up questions about the maintenance history and the presence of all the necessary documentation. @RQ58 also asked about dent details, suggesting that there might be issues needing clarification, although @1988BMWM6 (The Seller) assured that these concerns would be addressed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express overwhelming appreciation for the vehicle's condition and history, with @NielT95 labeling it a 'true beauty' and @SIRoadrunner remarking on its cleanliness, even suggesting it surpasses their own vehicle. @1947chevy (The Seller) shares a story about the care and maintenance of the truck, noting that it was kept in a garage, rarely used, and aided in preserving its originality. Commenters like @Blue18 are impressed by the vehicle's survival against the harsh New York climate, intrigued by its well-maintained underbody and original components, including fuel and brake lines, while @Tigers196884 believes the vehicle deserves a price akin to that of higher-end models like a Land Cruiser.
Neutral: Commenters seek to clarify details about the vehicle's features and specifications. @heaps inquires about the availability of third-row seating, which @1947chevy (The Seller) confirms is present. There are also discussions around the drivetrain, with @comittina and @EasyDavey discussing the vehicle's all-wheel-drive system. @MyBoyMax asks about potential prior accidents and rust, to which @1947chevy (The Seller) assures there's been no bodywork or damage, only minor paint blemishes. This indicates the seller is transparent and responsive to inquiries, enhancing the vehicle's appeal to potential buyers.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns or point out discrepancies regarding features and specifications. @Olbugger mentions a lack of heated seats, assuming such features were standard for the Denali model, leading to clarification from @1947chevy (The Seller) that the second-row seats are not heated due to the vehicle's upgrade to captain's chairs. Additionally, there are discussions about the vehicle's color, with @MRPRO raising questions on whether it has undergone a color change from its original Cherry Ice Metallic. Furthermore, @1globalleader brings up potential concerns about leaks and vehicle condition, indicating a cautious approach to assessing the vehicle's mechanical status.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @MikeTorto has received positive feedback about the vehicle's build quality and emotional significance. Commenters like @APLANTEDLEIF appreciate the attention to detail and the sentimental value of the car, highlighting that it represents a bonding project with family. @Drdjet also expressed admiration, calling it the 'PERFECT Manx', indicating it's well-regarded among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @JustJed and @solidlifters, asked for additional information such as driving videos and details about the vehicle's registration history. @MikeTorto clarified that the car was registered in Montana for personal reasons and explained about its features and serial number, sharing insights about its build characteristics. This adds clarity to the vehicle's provenance and specifications.
Negative: There were hints of sadness in the comments about parting with the vehicle due to its emotional ties, as noted by @MikeTorto who mentioned the difficulty in selling something built with close family involvement. @APLANTEDLEIF remarked on the unfortunate circumstance that the car cannot be passed on to family members involved in its creation, reflecting on the emotional burden of letting go of such a cherished project.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the overall appeal and aesthetics of the Bentley Arnage, especially praising its luxurious interior and impressive performance. @GDogg noted the vehicle's super nice appearance and decent leather despite its mileage, while @Vikdromeda referred to it as a stunning example with low miles and big performance. The seller, @Wob, shared that the car has been a prize in a valued collection and emphasized the car's honest condition, expressing pride in its well-maintained status and beautiful paint. Overall, the sentiment reflects admiration for the craftsmanship and heritage of the Bentley brand, particularly this model's unique features and performance capabilities.
Neutral: Several comments discuss specific details about the Bentley Arnage's design and specifications without strong positive or negative feelings. @AN89AG provided insights about the different engine options between the Arnage models, clarifying the differences in power and performance. @snib65 raised questions regarding some images showing imperfections which led to a discussion about reflections and overall photo quality. These neutral comments suggest an active engagement from the community to better understand the condition and features of the vehicle, showcasing a mix of curiosity and appreciation for the car's nuances without any deep-set bias.
Negative: Some critiques appeared regarding the seller's portrayal of the vehicle. @snib65 pointed out potential inconsistencies in the images showcased, particularly related to reflections that might misrepresent the car's condition. Others expressed concerns about the challenges of maintaining such a luxury vehicle, as @Vikdromeda mentioned the perception that maintenance might not be as scary as some say. Despite these comments, the observations seem to stem more from a place of inquiry rather than outright negativity, highlighting a balanced approach to discussing the luxury vehicle's strengths and considerations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle for its stunning appearance and specifications. @cuzzinolaf highlighted the gorgeous design and quality photos, while @ed1969 called it the prettiest 993 he has seen. @Wob (The Seller) emphasized the vehicle's low mileage and impressive color, noting that it has been freshly serviced and is ready for enjoyment, indicating high confidence in the car's condition. @boaboyoz described it as magnificent, echoing sentiments of admiration from others who admire the car's overall aesthetics.
Neutral: Several participants contributed to the discussion with factual inquiries about particular features of the vehicle. @mrgoodvibes sought clarification about the 'Carrera S' logo and its options, which @clearcutworld answered, providing insights about standard features versus optional ones. At the same time, many commenters engaged in a collaborative analysis of the car's technical specifications, such as brake calipers and upgrades, fostering a positive and informative atmosphere in the comment section.
Negative: Some users posted concerns regarding the complexity of the auction process and the authenticity of the car's features. @gdhernandez listed various mechanical inquiries including concerns about engine performance and maintenance records, suggesting a cautious approach from potential bidders. @Mtaylor5405 expressed worry about potential issues with driving the car home, reflecting a sentiment that, despite the vehicle's beauty, trust in its mechanical condition is paramount, highlighting a typical buyer's apprehension in classic car auctions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @pjszak (The Seller) mentions that this C2 has been lightly used and well cared for, highlighting their enjoyable experiences at car shows and events. @JohnF1966 appreciates the car's subtle flared fenders, while @PTC57 notes the car appears well maintained and has a unique look. @Provette67 finds the teak wheel a nice touch. @dannyluce63 expresses interest in the car due to its rarity and potential for restoration, remarking positively on the fender flares. @C1C2Fan calls it a beautiful car and thanks @Shootnride for clarifying technical details, showcasing a constructive and engaged community discussion. @Gord6 admires the color combination and the car's historical appeal, emphasizing its head-turning design.
Neutral: Several comments discuss technical details and specifications of the vehicle. @pjszak (The Seller) claims the car is a numbers-matching vehicle and shares information about the original and replaced parts, including the carburetor and water pump. @C1C2Fan inquires about the engine's condition and past refurbishments, with @Gord6 asking if the engine has ever been rebuilt. @Shootnride contributes to the discussion by providing insights about casting dates and how they relate to the car's history. Additionally, @maverickster points out an emblem mismatch that could suggest alterations, while @Lurvey offers observations about the wheel openings and potential modifications.
Negative: @PTC57 raises a concern about a potentially misaligned front grill, which @pjszak (The Seller) acknowledges. @Lurvey questions whether the wheel openings have been altered, expressing uncertainty about their originality. @maverickster adds skepticism regarding an emblem not being from the correct year, indicating possible discrepancies in the vehicle's authenticity. @Lurvey also mentions the presence of bondo-type filler in the wheel wells, prompting inquiries about factory bonding strips. Lastly, there is discussion about the engine's authenticity with doubts raised by other users about whether modifications might have affected the original specifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the exceptional condition and aesthetics of the vehicle. @Peugeotdr expressed that it is 'perfect the way it is', while @Hackberry referred to it as a 'really cool Scout' that looks comfortable in its environment. @BroncoAl remarked on its great condition and predicted an increase in value over time, aligning it with other classic vehicles like Broncos and K5 Blazers. @1970TransAm, the seller, affirmed that the vehicle is 100% roadworthy, confirming that it has updated disc brakes and new tires, which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: @sdallasesq inquired about the vehicle's original classification and specifics about the bulkhead attachment. @RhodyRed asked for interior images, especially concerning the condition of areas related to the travel top, indicating curiosity rather than criticism. Other comments, such as those from @OFritz3 and @MillValleyGreen, focused on the history and functionality of the vehicle's components, including inquiries about compression tests and the wiper motors, portraying the buyers' interest in maintaining the vehicle's vintage integrity without showing negative bias.
Negative: @MillValleyGreen pointed out issues with the wiper function and expressed concern over the absence of proper lubrication or possible upgrades needed to maintain original equipment. Furthermore, he noticed grinding sounds in the driving videos shared by @1970TransAm, prompting questions about the clutch and transmission condition. Despite @1970TransAm's reassurances regarding the vehicle's performance during typical driving conditions, the discussions around potential repairs highlight concerns that may affect buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @a990dna expressed great admiration for the Chevelle's looks, referring to it as the best combination he has seen, reminiscing about his own experience with a similar model. @C_Smith provided detailed descriptions of the vehicle's original specifications, highlighting features like the original 396 engine and the car's condition, which he noted includes unique historical elements like baby shoes from the original owner. Additionally, @boaboyoz and @Highlander63 praised the car's build and color combination, noting its gorgeous appearance and wonderful stance, suggesting it will perform well in the auction.
Neutral: @enthusiastic_enthusiast, the seller, expressed excitement for the auction and highlighted their experience, stating they would provide a thorough overview video while encouraging fans to engage with questions. Throughout the comments, there were inquiries about the car's specifications, such as @John_ford's question regarding the cylinder heads and rear gear, which @C_Smith answered with detailed information about the vehicle’s specifications and ongoing auction progress. @Knuckles-R-Busted and @Beerman99 made neutral observations about the tires and stance, contributing to a balanced view of the car's presentation.
Negative: While many commenters found the Chevelle impressive, some concerns were raised about its condition. @BobbyVtag pointed out a potentially bent front bumper, which was dismissed by @enthusiastic_enthusiast as normal. Additionally, @FullSizeL72 expressed disappointment over the limited number of pictures provided, indicating a desire for more visual information about the vehicle. @Ketzer made suggestions about modifications needed to complete the car's performance aesthetics, which, while constructive, could imply that the car needs improvement to reach its full potential.
![]() |
17×8.5″ and 17×10″ AMG Aero III Wheels by OZ Racing for Mercedes-Benz
Set of Four 17" AMG Aero III Wheels
Lot 216883
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @thesheikh expressed appreciation for @Tommy604604's transparency regarding the hairline crack in one wheel, highlighting the importance of including rim condition in auction descriptions. @Tommy604604 provided detailed responses to inquiries about fitment and shipping, demonstrating a willingness to assist potential buyers. Furthermore, he shared anecdotal evidence from a local car show enhancing the desirability of the OZ AMG Aero III wheels.
Neutral: Several commenters asked questions related to the fitment of the wheels on different vehicle models, such as the 1995 E320 Cabriolet and the 211 E63 AMG. @Tommy604604 responded to these inquiries with useful information, including a fitting guide link for further reference. There were inquiries about shipping options to various locations, including Europe and Saudi Arabia, which @Tommy604604 confirmed are available.
Negative: @DiTorino raised a concern about the tendency of these wheels to crack in specific areas and questioned their safety with hairline cracks. Additionally, some commenters noted criticisms regarding auction descriptions lacking essential details about wheel conditions, with @thesheikh emphasizing the need for clearer communication from auction platforms like @bringatrailer. @VerbalKent also sought clarification on whether the hairline crack could cause air leakage, showcasing a level of skepticism about the wheel's suitability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz praised the white Riviera as a wonderful car with tremendous build quality and an interesting history. @Dollycat3 expressed admiration for the car's stunning color, interior, and the manual windows design, calling it an exceptional beauty. @Baronvonbrutus also found the Riviera beautiful and appreciated that it wasn't modified in a destructive manner. @Ramenator noted that the first generation Rivieras are special, highlighting a strong impression from the SEMA show.
Neutral: @neilpierson25 mentioned the change from factory saddle upholstery to black, prompting a discussion with @rivnut about the complexities involved in such a change. @mike_rockwell provided insight into how OPG sources parts by using original cars for replication without ruining them. Several commenters asked for videos showcasing the car's functionality, including cold starts and driving tests, indicating a general interest in seeing the car in action.
Negative: @Looker1954 raised questions about the absence of air conditioning features in the car, which was advertised in videos. @Red99 expressed concerns regarding the steering wheel's positioning, questioning whether it was installed incorrectly. Other comments sought clarification on various car features, such as the functioning of the clock, lights, and sound systems, which highlighted some uncertainties about the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received positive feedback from several commenters. @JaySoCal described it as a nice truck despite the concerns regarding its title history. Additionally, @Jawservice praised it as a great-looking Blazer. The seller, @Ryguy107, highlighted numerous upgrades and enhancements made to the truck since its purchase, including a complete interior overhaul, engine tuning, and the addition of features like air suspension, which improves ride comfort and towing capability.
Neutral: The seller provided clarifications regarding the truck's condition and history, notably addressing concerns about the total loss status reported by insurance. @Ryguy107 explained that the vehicle was purchased in 2020 and that it was inspected and serviced annually. Specifics about the hardtop's availability and location were also discussed, with mentions of trying to upload pictures and details like where the air suspension components are situated, indicating an ongoing engagement in answering potential buyers' queries.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's history, particularly regarding a past total loss due to severe water damage. @Puremeat42 and @JohnCorry posed questions about the implications of this status, specifically asking for more details on the total loss and functionality issues like the electric rear window. @Drew510 also pointed out potential misunderstanding in a query about the air compressor's location, highlighting a lack of clarity in the information shared by the seller.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the aesthetic and performance qualities of the vehicle, with @ripper996 describing it as a 'very, very nice car' and @boaboyoz praising the 'fantastic Meteor Gray Metallic 997.1 C2S coupe' as a lovely example. The seller, @casciomotors, emphasizes the car's readiness for sale, noting its low mileage of 11,570 and recent full service inspection, assuring potential buyers that it needs nothing before its new owner takes it home. This positive feedback contributes to an overall impression of the vehicle as an appealing and well-maintained sports car.
Neutral: In the comments, there are inquiries related to the vehicle's specifications, such as @BananaBreadPerformance asking for the tire date codes. The seller promptly responds by directing the commentator to specific photos that display the 2022 date codes and tread condition of the tires. This exchange reflects a neutral tone, focusing on logistical details that potential buyers may want to know without expressing strong opinions either way about the car.
Negative: No negative comments were found regarding the vehicle. All feedback provided appears to be either positive or neutral, focusing on the car's quality and providing necessary information for potential buyers. The absence of negative remarks suggests that there are no significant concerns or issues raised about the 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the Fisker Karma's condition and unique attributes, with @Dave_Car_Guy praising its beautiful color and reliable performance based on his personal experience. @lotusfarm highlighted the car's efficiency and performance, describing it as a bargain in the market, emphasizing its capabilities with both electric and gas engines. Additionally, @momentum985 (The Seller) enthusiastically engaged with the audience, clarifying the car's features and maintenance history, and encouraging further interaction on the auction platform, showing a commitment to transparency and customer engagement.
Neutral: Comments varied on the significance of the car's previous ownership by @Sanjay Gupta. @vwbussed posed a question about whether Gupta's ownership might decrease the vehicle's value, while others like @Thesunisrising and @treid1168 shared personal tastes in celebrity-owned cars, showing mixed feelings about the celebrity element. Commenters also discussed technical details about the vehicle's range and specifications, indicating a general interest in its performance alongside celebrity affiliations, which influenced their views without producing strong positive or negative sentiments.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism about the car's appeal tied to its celebrity status. @BlitzLead questioned the marketing strategy of leveraging Gupta's name as a significant selling point. Others like @bry593 felt sympathy for the vehicle, implying that the attention it received was undeserved. Additional skepticism came from @parshooter, who inquired about potential signs of wear, such as whether the car had been smoked in, suggesting concerns over its prior usage, while others received flags for being non-constructive, showing a divided reception in the commentary.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments highlighting its beauty and unique design. @bry593 described it as a great bike, while @Moore4602 appreciated its cool combination of old and new styles along with its great colors. @DjangosHP echoed these sentiments by agreeing with meticulous ownership and referring to it as a beautiful ride. @FlyingMuleRider shared fond memories of owning a similar bike, calling it a gorgeous machine that's both stunning and fast. @JGraham noted its homage to the original Z900, praising its modern technology and braking system, which overcomes the shortcomings of older models. Overall, commenters are thrilled with the bike's aesthetics and performance, making it an appealing choice for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments discussed specific features and experiences with the bike without indicating extreme opinions. For instance, @Skelter (The Seller) offered details about the bike's maintenance, stating it's been kept in immaculate condition and shared information about modifications like the titanium muffler. Commenters like @sjhinfla pointed out that they had heard about potential low-speed throttle response issues but noted that specific concerns might not apply to newer models. @TATA455 shared similar experiences and suggested enthusiasts consider remapping the ECU if they notice problems, but still emphasized the bike as a fun ride. These comments reveal a mix of positive experiences and a recognition of some common concerns within the motorcycling community.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback, some users raised concerns about potential issues. @sjhinfla referred to past reports of rough low-speed throttle response, while @TATA455 confirmed having experienced this issue and recommended tuning solutions for improvement. @Jeffz added that although he encountered the throttle glitch, it was manageable. These comments suggest that while the bike is generally well-received, there are minor performance criticisms that prospective buyers should consider, and acknowledge the importance of looking into tuning options as a possible remedy.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the F8 Tributo as sublime and divine, highlighting it as an exemplary example. @The_Dude_Abides also finds the vehicle's specifications outstanding, expressing a strong interest in acquiring one in the future. @pilotrene (The Seller) confirms that the car has undergone its annual maintenance and is in perfect mechanical shape, stating it is a gem and wishing good luck to bidders. Additionally, @AGARWAL2032 appreciates the silver color of the Ferrari, labeling it as underrated and excellent for daily driving.
Neutral: @pilotrene (The Seller) provides various details regarding the vehicle's status and maintenance history, mentioning that it will go for annual maintenance and providing updates on the factory warranty and lien amounts. @Scullyd inquires about the presence of Apple CarPlay, while @catdog2 asks about the factory warranty status and the presence of paint protection film, with @pilotrene indicating that the car does not have a warranty and confirming that it will receive maintenance soon.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the vehicle's condition, such as @alexbard questioning potential paint chips and scratches, and @mclaren12c observing that the rear diffuser seems to have multiple scrapes. @flyfaster notes a potential crack or tear, prompting a response from @pilotrene (The Seller) who asserts that such wear and tear is normal for a car that has been driven. Other inquiries, like @Italia_227's comment about the name "Tributo" implying a replica and general concerns regarding the car's smog test status by both @Ilikecarstoomuch and @bc90210, reflect skepticism about the vehicle's overall condition and authenticity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @pigman praises the vehicle by highlighting its powerful combination of a SBC 350 engine and a 700R4 transmission, describing it as the perfect car for both city driving and highway cruising. He also emphasizes the quality of the design, mentioning the three-link rear suspension, which contributes to a super car-like driving experience. Additionally, he expresses admiration for the car's beauty and wishes the seller good luck.
Neutral: @Kendal09 inquires about pictures of the vehicle with the top off, showing interest in viewing the car in different configurations. @jeffr18, who is the seller, responds by stating that they did not take any pictures without the roof due to time constraints and questionable weather. He further clarifies that removing the hardtop is not overly complicated but time-consuming, as it involves accessing bolts both under the dash and in the engine hood area.
Negative: @pigman notes that while components such as side glass and power mechanisms for the vehicle can be sourced from Factory Five Racing (FFR), the labor costs can be steep, citing a price of $150 per hour. This could deter potential buyers who may want to perform repairs or upgrades on a budget. Overall, there is an awareness that modifications might require significant financial and time investments.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @e9er expressed appreciation for the car's unique color, stating it was a one-year option and reminiscing about their own previous experience with an Anthracite model. @WS6 echoed this sentiment, highlighting the car's aesthetics and wishing the seller luck with the auction while mentioning it seems like a great driver M5. @Jaredtown praised the car's overall beauty and its desirable specifications, while @BlueChipCar (The Seller) elaborated on the repaint history, ensuring that the car looks aesthetically pleasing to the eye, indicating their commitment to presenting the vehicle in excellent condition.
Neutral: Comments from @Chillynder and @MrKevinRosales focused on the condition and history of the vehicle, with inquiries about previous work on the hood and paint. @itopol expressed interest in a personal viewing of the car, highlighting its appeal. @DOlsen and others raised questions regarding modifications made to the car, such as whether the halo lights were OEM or aftermarket, and the consistency of the paint job between different panels. These questions indicate a desire for transparency about the car's history and condition, which is essential for potential bidders.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @WS6 about undisclosed paint work and misalignment issues regarding the hood and passenger doors, suggesting hidden damage. @458 noted inconsistencies in paint blending on the car's right side, while @D3774 questioned the possibility of the car being in an accident based on these observations. Multiple commenters pointed out potential defects such as a falling headliner and non-functional head unit, with @DOlsen emphasizing the need for a thorough list of modifications and repairs to ensure bidders know what they are investing in.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters shared their admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a beautifully preserved example of a classic woodie. @stugottz remarked that it only needed a surfboard on top to complete its look, while @bosshoss3406pack expressed love for the post-war body style and appreciated the car's unique hot-rodding history. @LutzMultimediaLLC noted the rarity of original wood, elevating the aesthetic value of the vehicle significantly, and several users expressed excitement and positive nostalgia about its classic design and craftsmanship.
Neutral: There were several informative contributions regarding the vehicle's details and history. @Greybeard2 pointed out the car's misidentification as a 1947 model when it might actually be a 1946, explaining the common practice of titling cars by the year sold rather than built, especially for higher-end models. @RWClark added that while the color might not be to everyone's taste, it still appears to be a solid choice for a post-war woodie, indicating a level of balance between opinion and fact among the comments about the car.
Negative: Some comments also reflected a sense of disappointment or caution regarding the vehicle. @Maroonedd shared a lack of enthusiasm for the yellow color, mentioning it was not their favorite, while others raised queries about certain modifications and historical ambiguities of the vehicle, hinting at concerns over the authenticity of its title year. @LRP shared a nostalgic story that highlighted the challenges of finding well-preserved woodies in the past, suggesting that there are still risks involved with the condition of vintage cars, particularly regarding their wooden parts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express high admiration for the vehicle, describing it with superlatives such as 'amazing', 'magnificent beauty', and 'awesomeness'. Many highlight its exceptional condition post-restoration, with @racer355 emphasizing it being a rare example of a RUF BTR that has been meticulously cared for. Additionally, some buyers express strong interest in acquiring the car, stating they might sell their current vehicles to purchase this one. @3pedalstable simply states 'Beast!!', encapsulating a general sentiment shared by others regarding the model's performance and desirability.
Neutral: Several commenters asked relevant questions regarding specific features, previous ownership, and service history. @Viking80 inquires about the car's service history in Sweden, while @PorscheCentreVaughan raises questions regarding the engine's injection system. @racer355, the seller, responds clearly to these inquiries, providing detailed information about the vehicle's specifications, restoration history, and previous ownership in Europe. Others express curiosity about its compatibility with California smog regulations, seeking clarification on various aspects of the vehicle's condition and regulations.
Negative: There are some concerns mentioned regarding the car's previous condition and service documentation. @lcrain points out a missing AC belt in initial photos, raising questions about its functionality. Other commenters express skepticism about whether it will pass California's strict emission standards. @pnd4pnd directly questions its ability to meet these regulations, pointing to a significant consideration for potential buyers in that state. Overall, while many praise the vehicle, a few commenters voice hesitance and request further assurances regarding its service and legal compliance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its appeal by noting it is a stunning recreation of the Alfa Romeo GTAm style. @solidol emphasized the car's aesthetic, and @AutodeltaGTA2 shared their previous positive experiences with a similar model, which they raced successfully. The seller, @Lrap74, contributed to this positive sentiment by outlining the car's prestigious history and its construction under the guidance of accomplished figures in the racing community.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification regarding the vehicle's specifications and requirements for U.S. registration. Both @Finkster and @Watry questioned the gearbox details, to which @Lrap74 provided corrections and confirmed that the car has a 5-speed transmission as per original specifications. Additionally, @NLG5001 and @Borden engaged in discussions about the car's importability and potential street legalization in the U.S., with @Lrap74 affirming the sale team's commitment to assist with such logistics and providing spec sheets and further details when available.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's legality for street use, with @Berlinista asking about the absence of HTP paperwork, and @Watry pointing out discrepancies regarding the car's labeled model. @NLG5001 and @barbasharku both questioned the car's import possibilities and legality in everyday driving scenarios, to which @Lrap74 clarified that it is indeed a race car not intended for public road use. This may deter some potential buyers who are interested in street legality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the car's color and overall aesthetic appeal. @BENTJAG complimented the restoration, calling it a beautiful job, while @Shaggsloco22, who claimed to have seen the car in person, remarked that the vehicle is stunning and that the pictures do not do it justice. @jerrybramlett expressed admiration for the car's fit and restoration quality, commending the seller for their meticulous work and the perfect fit of various components. @dannyluce63 also appreciated the rare Jewel Blue color, highlighting the uniqueness of the car with only 436 units produced in that shade.
Neutral: Several comments indicated curiosity about specific details related to the car's restoration and specifications. @lookingforacoolcar sought confirmation on the color shade depicted in photos, raising questions about possible inconsistencies. Other users, such as @Bordeaux, engaged in discussions about the engine's authenticity and the implications for a Top Flight Award. Overall, while there was a lot of interest in the finer details of the car, many seemed to be seeking information rather than having strong opinions either way.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the car's condition and authenticity. @grandsport12 pointed out a potential issue with the VIN tag appearing on a rusty column, which may indicate problems. @Bordeaux expressed skepticism about the engine suffix not aligning with what would be expected for the car, hinting at potential discrepancies that could affect its value or reputation. Additionally, @LINY expressed disappointment regarding missing images and a lack of clear information about the car's tools and spare tire, furthering the discussion on the vehicle's completeness and restoration integrity.
![]() |
Single-Family-Owned 1992 Dodge Power Ram W250 4×4 Club Cab 5-Speed
3B7KM23C0NM514630
Lot 216898
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @Vtec4ever appreciates the manual transmission and the lack of DEF, calling the vehicle a winner. @noahburrough (The Seller) provides clear answers to inquiries about the working conditions of features such as air conditioning and cruise control, ensuring potential buyers that they are operational. @driven4more expresses enjoyment at the reaction of those unfamiliar with the vehicle, and fellow commenters @njarrett and @Dhoga advocate for maintaining the manual transmission legacy among millennials, showcasing a sense of community around this vehicle type.
Neutral: A number of commenters have asked for videos or further information about the vehicle's features, particularly regarding the Jake brake and its driving capabilities, with @noahburrough (The Seller) promising to provide these. @elly18 inquires about the rear-end ratio and engine RPM, while other users like @Bigtexmob express frustration with shipping arrangements and request for options holding the car. The existence of aftermarket gauges is noted by @carlivar, highlighting a mix of inquiry on functionality and customization.
Negative: Some commenters, including @Bigtexmob, express dissatisfaction with the difficulties of coordinating shipping, indicating it may deter their bidding. Concerns are also raised about the completeness of information regarding specifications, such as the unclear details around the rear-end ratio mentioned by @elly18. This lack of clarity could discourage potential buyers looking for in-depth technical details.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @TokyoMotorsDC provided a specific detail about the engine, noting that the kei trucks all utilize a 656cc engine and clarified that the one being discussed has the original engine manufactured by Honda. This adds credibility and assurance about the quality of the vehicle, emphasizing that it is built by a reputable manufacturer.
Neutral: @Gr865 inquired whether all the mini pickups for sale feature the same 656cc engine and sought clarification on the engine's manufacturer. This comment reflects curiosity about the product specifications and aims to gather more information regarding the vehicle's origin and performance.
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @MRSDENWERKS expressed excitement for the truck hitting the auction with its beautiful detailing and no reserve policy ensuring a new owner by week’s end. @boaboyoz praised the truck's vibrant red and white color scheme and called the wheels fun, highlighting the positive experience with the seller. @Todd_Z greatly admired the truck’s detailed upgrades, mentioning the benefits of the modern engine and brakes, and responded positively to the overall craftsmanship, expressing confidence in its performance and longevity.
Neutral: Comments by @history350 noted the truck's engine type known as the "H.O." and its impressive features, while @thedassler provided historical references about the truck's seating options and layout, stating facts about the Ranger package and confirming the authenticity of the upgraded bucket seats. @fabulousfurryfreakbros raised questions about the truck’s paint and tire details, conveying a desire for more specifics on its condition, which @DENWERKS, the seller, addressed promptly. @chrisdos inquired about the title transfer process, indicating interest in the vehicle while seeking clarity on the purchasing mechanics.
Negative: Despite overall enthusiasm for the vehicle, @Danno9 criticized the placement of the gas cap in the bed as a poor design decision that detracted from its appeal. Additionally, @MRSDENWERKS pointed out that the windshield contains two small stars above the driver's side wipers and explained the challenges encountered in replacing it during restoration, indicating that it could be an issue for potential buyers. This was further emphasized by @Shawh's mention of the cost of painting the truck, suggesting the importance of attention to detail and potential concerns with maintaining its quality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @umamialex reminisces about childhood memories associated with the van, recalling family road trips and the nostalgia surrounding it. @Temerian notes how the van was expensive in its time and expresses admiration for its condition. @MrPickleSticks appreciates the transparency from the seller regarding the van's condition and history, and @terrykiwala finds it to be a cool vehicle. @TobinMotorWorks (The Seller) shares personal experiences and stories related to the van, highlighting its history and the joy it has brought to others, making it a legendary vehicle around Ithaca.
Neutral: @letthegypsyhaveit raises questions about the condition of the van, particularly regarding possible dents and the yoga center lettering, which @TobinMotorWorks addresses by clarifying that it is a decal and not a dent. @Dantheman1982 inquires about the A/C functionality and possible leaks, to which the seller explains there is no A/C but no leaks either. @Impslap confirms that the van has never had rear seats, and @Dogpackmedic appreciates the service records provided by the seller, prompting a discussion on the frequency of oil changes.
Negative: Some commenters express disappointment regarding certain features of the van. @MrPickleSticks wishes the van had a rear seat and seatbelts for family use, while @RWD-FTW humorously questions if the seller contacted people who left notes on the windshield expressing interest in the van. @HoBo4MJ1 mentions the length of the driving video, indicating some may find it excessive, even though it was well-received by others like @HoBo4MJ1 for its storytelling.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Rocky_Dan praised the Jeep as being in superb condition, suggesting that it will make its new owner very happy. This sentiment is supported by @MTNlife9, who acknowledges the challenges of accurately capturing the Jeep's true condition through photos. Additionally, @dannyluce63 expressed nostalgia for their own LJ, commenting on its practicality and smooth ride, further highlighting the popular appeal of this model.
Neutral: @MTNlife9 provided clarification regarding a minor accident noted on the CarFax report, explaining that it involved low-speed bumper contact resulting in only cosmetic damage. The Seller also mentioned recent service reports, detailing necessary maintenance, such as oil changes and a replaced water pump due to leaks, which reassures potential buyers about the vehicle's upkeep.
Negative: Some comments raised questions about the vehicle's history and maintenance. @SimpleMan73 asked why @MTNlife9 was selling the Jeep after a short while, indicating potential concerns about the ownership timeline. @Lauhoffm inquired about any leaks in the vehicle, prompting @MTNlife9 to confirm that only a coolant leak from the water pump was noted and addressed recently.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its appeal as a unique project opportunity. @Old900sForever and @Tigers196884 express enthusiasm for the car's potential, emphasizing that it is a rare collector's item, especially for dedicated enthusiasts willing to invest time into restoration. @Carmalarky notes that the rebuilt engine and transmission significantly enhance the vehicle's value and mention the plentiful documentation and spare parts as a testament to its previous care.
Neutral: The seller, @pratytimes, actively engages with the community by inviting questions and sharing updates about the vehicle's condition. They confirm that while the vehicle isn't currently roadworthy, it can be made so with some dedicated work, emphasizing the need for repairs particularly in the electrical and mechanical systems. They also promise to provide more detailed information about the necessary repairs ahead of the auction, demonstrating transparency about the car's condition.
Negative: There are several concerns raised about the vehicle's state, notably the need for significant repairs as pointed out by @Tomcat and @Old900sForever. The seller outlines numerous issues, including damages to the wiring, the APC/Boost/Turbo system, and other necessary fixes to get the car on the road. @Old900sForever expresses their own limitations in terms of time and resources, indicating that the repair work may be daunting for potential buyers.
![]() |
Bob Lutz’s 2020 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Coupe 3LT Z51
1G1Y82D40L5000035
Lot 216903
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @915fan commented about the vehicle being a "great car, great guy, great color combo" indicating a strong admiration for the vehicle. @sackboy praised Bob Lutz, referencing his impressive industry influence and expressing a desire for Lutz to sign inside the glove box if he wins the auction. @Carrerachas suggested that the car might command a 10-15% premium due to its history, highlighting its appeal as a unique talking point for potential buyers.
Neutral: @vipermike0217 provided background on Bob Lutz, emphasizing his impactful career with Chrysler and General Motors, which adds historical value to the car. @wmw21 pointed out that the interesting aspect of the car being owned by Lutz lies in the specific choices he made when ordering it. Other commenters like @CanadaCorner and @netminder44 acknowledged Lutz's significance in the automotive industry but expressed skepticism about the added value of his ownership.
Negative: @Crussell99 remarked that the car "could use a good detailing" and noted potential cosmetic issues such as bug pits and plastic rubbing, raising questions about its maintenance. @RyanH505 questioned whether prospective buyers would value its previous ownership by Lutz, expressing indifference to the connection. Additionally, various comments pointed out concerns about the vehicle's condition and the authenticity of ownership's value, with @dlasic stating it might not significantly impact the vehicle's overall market worth.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters are enthusiastic about the performance of the 2018 Dodge Challenger SRT Demon, noting its impressive speed and horsepower, with @parshooter highlighting its 800 hp. @anthonyjp mentions it has a quick return to auction, while @SpeedRider suggests that the car's value could increase significantly, especially with future models transitioning to hybrid technology. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, bolsters this enthusiasm by emphasizing their commitment to quality transactions and offering services like expedited shipping and warranty coverage, which highlights a customer-focused approach that many previous customers seem to appreciate, as seen in the high Google review ratings.
Neutral: The auction has garnered attention due to its listing as 'No Reserve,' a notable change from the previous auction where the vehicle did not meet its reserve price. @Loggedon explains that the vehicle is now under a new listing strategy, inviting more bidders. Additionally, there are clarifications about the vehicle’s specifications, with @DCcardshark seeking details on the wheels, while @Collectibleclassics responds with information about the wheels being original but powder-coated, demonstrating the seller's transparency in answering inquiries.
Negative: There are some concerns among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's history, evidenced by @Alwallis2000 questioning why the car is being relisted when it previously exceeded expectations. @DonaldDuck80 notes that the anticipated value around $90,000 may not be as high as it could be if the relevant buyers get involved, indicating potential skepticism about reaching ideal bidding conditions. @ILL_Win expresses confusion about the auction platform's policy changes, reflecting a broader confusion about the processes that could potentially affect the car's value and how it is presented to bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @scscarborough described the vehicle as an exquisite example of a Flying Spur and expressed curiosity about the seller's decision to sell it, wishing them success in the auction. Additionally, @krosen19, the seller, emphasized the beauty and flawless condition of this last model of the W12 and highlighted its rising value due to tariffs affecting new models. @krosen19 also encouraged potential buyers to engage in the comment section for questions, showing openness to communication and enthusiasm about the auction.
Neutral: @BrokenAdam asked for photos of the rear climate control and heated/cooled rear seats, indicating a specific interest in the vehicle's features. In response, @krosen19 assured him that he would post the pictures soon, demonstrating responsiveness. @bishnit311 mentioned trying to contact the seller but had not received a reply, prompting a follow-up message that highlighted the need for better communication.
Negative: @volvo268 made a light-hearted comment about @BrokenAdam's apparent fascination with pictures of rear climate controls. Meanwhile, @b.flippo expressed sadness over the retirement of the W12 engine, reflecting a sense of loss over the discontinuation of what he referred to as a 'dinosaur.' @krosen19 acknowledged needing to sell three cars to make room for new arrivals and mentioned the necessity of this decision, indicating that such sacrifices are difficult for car enthusiasts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @EuroJDMAuto has presented a well-maintained 1997 Alpina B3 3.2 with a powerful 3.2 engine that provides impressive acceleration and drivability. This seller is experienced and has brought multiple Alpinas to the auction site, showcasing a level of expertise and reliability that previous buyers, such as @CajunSS, have praised for excellent communication and ease of transaction. The iconic AlpinaBlau 2 Metallic color is highlighted as a desirable feature, attracting enthusiasts. The seller is also willing to assist with international shipping, making the process easier for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters have raised questions about the vehicle's condition and logistics of purchasing, indicating a mixed interest. @sh4ftBAT asked about import experience, and @Feldmania inquired about additional costs related to shipping and customs fees when importing to the US. The seller has provided detailed responses about the shipping process, including anticipated costs for taxes and duties, and addressed inquiries about the car's maintenance history and any repairs it has undergone, including concerns over the A/C and transmission.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the car's current state, with @Tghooper noting the cumulative costs of duties and fees might deter potential buyers. @schnell540 questioned the working condition of the A/C and inquired about old components like the transmission. Others like @Mitsume are skeptical due to the car’s auction history marked with an accident, which raises doubt about its repair quality. @Raucky88M3 pointed out issues such as dry rotted seals on the door handles and requested more detailed photos, signaling an underlying apprehension about the overall condition of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) highlights the 2006 C55 AMG as an exceptional vehicle, combining unique desirability with the reliability of the M113 V8 5.5 AMG hand-built engine, which @Youngtimerclassics refers to as the best. They also emphasize their strong reputation with a 4.9/5.0 rating from hundreds of satisfied customers, indicating a commitment to smooth transactions and quality service. The seller provides various services such as nationwide shipping, storage, and even assistance with inspections, showcasing a customer-centered approach to selling this collectible car.
Neutral: Commenters like @kwhr49 acknowledge that despite having low mileage, there are multiple C55s listed concurrently on Bring a Trailer, both of which require new tires. They identify the C55 as a more reliable option compared to the C63 or C32, suggesting that parts for the vehicle can be sourced easily, although some front-end body panels are noted as exceptions. This indicates a generally favorable view of the vehicle's maintainability alongside some acknowledged challenges in ownership.
Negative: There are concerns noted by @WickedAce regarding the physical condition of the C55 AMG, highlighting evidence of dry rot and cracking in the tires. This raises red flags about the vehicle's maintenance and immediate needs, including the necessity for new tires as mentioned by @kwhr49. Overall, while the car is seen as a potential deal, the condition issues and typical maintenance requirements contribute to a slightly negative perception regarding its current state.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, emphasizing its beauty and rarity. @KyleHaney11 called it a beautiful car and inquired about clutch life data, reflecting an appreciation for its design and performance. @danz76 described the car as gorgeous and undervalued, while @lx450123 noted the impressive seats and inquired about their features. @DaIIas shared an insightful take on the MC Victory, arguing its performance differs significantly from the standard GranSport, highlighting its unique design and sharper handling. The seller (@fclr2014) supported these sentiments by detailing the car's history, maintenance record, and how it has remained in excellent condition, which led to positive comments about its market status.
Neutral: Comments also included inquiries about logistics and details, with users seeking additional information about the car. @Gandino posed questions regarding the car's location and key information, while also asking about the auction process. @evocativemotorcars noted a discrepancy in the mileage listed and asked for clarity, showing that potential buyers were interested in detailed specifications. The seller responded to these queries promptly, showcasing transparency regarding the vehicle's features and supporting documentation, which reflects a balanced interaction between potential buyers and the seller.
Negative: On the flip side, some commenters expressed skepticism about the vehicle's appeal, particularly regarding the manual transmission options. @gemini criticized the hype around the 6-speed manual, stating it lacks engagement and precision compared to modern alternatives. @FJMAN agreed, suggesting that the complexity of maintenance for manual transmissions could deter buyers. There was a general sentiment among a few users that the valuation may not align with the actual driving experience of the car, and @gemini conveyed frustration that a manual-equipped version could be valued higher than the MC Victory, indicating a disconnect in market perceptions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the 2011 Mercedes-Benz S63 AMG, often describing it as a breathtaking vehicle that fans of the brand aspire to own. @911c4s shared that this generation of AMG cars has a magical quality, indicating admiration among enthusiasts. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, underscored the exclusivity and desirability of this vehicle by promoting it as a unique offering with a No Reserve auction, which was highlighted as an enticing factor for potential buyers. The overall sentiment among those interested seems to reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's qualities and the auction process.
Neutral: Some discussions revolved around practical aspects of the car, such as its maintenance and condition. @gscharnagl inquired if any modifications were made to the vehicle since the last auction. Concerns about wear were raised by @rcantputt, who noted chips on the front air dam, while @georgepehanick suggested the need for new tires and an alignment. @Collectibleclassics responded to these inquiries, confirming the vehicle's condition while offering reasonable solutions that indicate the seller's willingness to facilitate maintenance for interested bidders. Additionally, @rizzmaster raised specific questions about the engine model and its reliability, which were addressed positively by other commenters.
Negative: There were a few concerns expressed regarding the car's condition and potential issues. @rcantputt pointed out visible wear on the air dam, which might require cosmetic attention, while @georgepehanick noted the need for new tires, estimating a cost of around $2,000. Furthermore, @rizzmaster raised apprehensions about the engine’s reliability based on past experiences with earlier models that had severe issues, which prompted further clarifications. While these negative sentiments were not overwhelmingly strong, they showcased some reservation among potential buyers regarding both the car's immediate needs and its reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express appreciation for the vintage race car, emphasizing its historical significance as a period race car from the 60s and 70s. @joe1, the seller, shares a personal connection to the car, detailing its story and the interesting previous owner, Karl. The inclusion of the original minilite wheels is highlighted as a positive, as they enhance the car's appearance compared to standard steel wheels. Commenters note the car's overall appeal, mentioning that it has been well-maintained and held its vintage character without modern alterations like larger fender flares.
Neutral: Several discussions revolve around technical inquiries regarding the condition and specifications of the vehicle. @Av8rboy58 and others ask about the strength of the drive shafts, transmission details, and engine modifications, indicating a shared interest in the car's performance. @joe1 responds confidently, confirming that the car moves under its own power and sharing insights about its engine, which has undergone some work. Additionally, there are mentions of minor rust issues and the identification of certain parts, showing the community's engagement with the car's specifics.
Negative: On the downside, some concerns are raised regarding potential structural integrity. @Fw189a and @aliceaustin point out issues related to rust, with comments suggesting there may be holes in the frame that could require attention. @59elva adds skepticism about whether certain damage is rust or the result of cutting, reflecting doubt about the car's condition. @joe1 acknowledges these concerns but reassures that most of the car is clean and highlights the areas where rust has been found, indicating a degree of transparency while also revealing areas needing repair work.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Cloverly3 praises the Porsche Panamera GTS, calling it an amazing car and expressing their admiration for the naturally aspirated 4.8L V8 engine, which they believe is one of the best modern Porsche engines. They describe their own experience with a similar model as consistently enjoyable, indicating that they think these cars are undervalued and highlighting the upgrades in the later models. They also wish the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: @Boostedblack99 (The Seller) describes their experience in buying and selling vehicles, emphasizing that they have owned this particular Panamera GTS since February 2025 and purchased it due to its low mileage and single-owner history. They also mention a minor incident in which the car was bumped in a parking lot but claim there was no damage. The seller proactively offers warranty details and notes their intention to assist any potential buyers throughout the transaction process.
Negative: Although there are no strongly negative comments, @Spencerjo327 inquires about the pads and rotors, implying uncertainty regarding their quality since they were not replaced at a Porsche dealership. This suggests a potential concern over the authenticity of components. Additionally, @ben_n asks why the seller is parting with the vehicle, which could imply skepticism about the vehicle's condition or desirability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 2023 Dodge Charger Pursuit Package is presented as an exceptional opportunity by @SeibelsClassics (The Seller), highlighting the vehicle's low mileage of only 57 original miles and its powerful 5.7-liter HEMI V8 engine. Commenters like @Youngtimerclassics express excitement about the inclusion of Last Call badges on the Pursuit variant, describing it as a future collector's item. The seller engages actively with bidders, responding to queries and thanking them for their interest, which adds a personal touch to the auction experience.
Neutral: Several comments focus on technical aspects and specifications of the vehicle, with @newcarpro providing detailed information about its equipment and features. Questions arise about the vehicle's drive configuration, with @brianleishman inquiring about whether it is two-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, to which @SeibelsClassics promptly replies that it is RWD. Other commenters share comparisons to older police vehicles, like @bentwheel reminiscing about classic models, and speculation about the vehicle's appeal to collectors in the future.
Negative: There are minimal negative comments, primarily focused on missing information or features. @CDehne expresses a desire for images of the trunk area, while @DrivingEnthusiast questions the availability of the Pursuit package in red and is surprised by its production. Additionally, there are light-hearted remarks from @Citabria98 about trading a classic Crown Vic Interceptor for the Charger, indicating a level of nostalgia and humor rather than dissatisfaction with the vehicle itself.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the 1965 Honda S600 for its stunning presentation and rarity, with @LeonardoJunel noting it was in "mint condition" and a "true museum-grade example." @design_build described the car as "absolutely beautiful in person and perfectly tiny," indicating a strong appreciation for its aesthetics. @grmtim shared a positive driving experience, stating it's one of the most fun little cars he has driven, which adds to the car's appeal as a desirable collectible.
Neutral: @essjatee, the seller, provided detailed information about the car's dimensions and history, responding to questions from interested buyers about the original engine and transmission, confirming it has a direct replacement engine and was restored to factory specifications. The discussion tackled practical aspects such as parts availability and the car's heritage, with @BananaBreadPerformance inquiring about sourcing parts since the vehicle was never imported to the U.S.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding the condition of the vehicle, with @anesth82 inquiring about the presence of surface rust and general reliability compared to later Hondas. This highlights potential worries about the car's age and maintenance. Additionally, comments like @Uncle_Pat's suggest frustration with the high value of the car, indicating that some potential buyers might find the price daunting or jokingly sarcastic about the selling price per comment.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed a strong appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its appealing design and performance features. @notlikelytowin4 noted their love for the car's styling, while @KByington emphasized the significance of the M sport seats for enhanced comfort and driving experience. @BrilloBob pointed out the potential resale value and expressed interest in upgrading to the vehicle's more powerful variant, focusing on the benefits of the 6-speed gearbox. @theraceshop detailed the extensive renovations and improvements made to the car, assuring potential buyers of its excellent condition and performance, with a nod towards the car's rarity and desirable specifications, including its lightweight M54 engine.
Neutral: Comments also provided insights into the car's condition and appearance. @JGraham remarked on the vehicle's remarkably low mileage for its age, suggesting that it could be a great deal. There was a request for a video walk-around and confirmation of service records, with @Dmitriylu highlighting concerns over the Front tire wear and the age of the tires in the provided photos. @theraceshop responded to various inquiries, assuring transparency about the vehicle's maintenance history and the upgrades made, including new tires and suspension components. The seller encouraged potential buyers to ask questions and arrange inspections to quell any concerns about the car's quality.
Negative: On the flip side, some comments raised issues regarding maintenance and cosmetic imperfections. @Gallagher5150 pointed out discrepancies in the paintwork, specifically mentioning the presence of orange peel in the pictures, and sought clarifications about any other repainted areas. @Dmitriylu also expressed skepticism about the stated condition of the tires based on photo evidence. Further, @Delfb1 asked about a possible hole in the exhaust pipe, and @JonnyScience inquired about potential smells inside the vehicle, such as cigarette smoke or mildew, indicating concerns for cleanliness and upkeep. @theraceshop promptly addressed these concerns, emphasizing the car's well-maintained status and clarifying doubts regarding its overall condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 highlights the beauty of the Graphite Grey vehicle, expressing a clear affection and belief that it deserves restoration. @johnmott shares his personal experience with the car, confirming that it runs, drives, and stops well while preferring the four-speed floor-shift manual over automatic. He views the car as a suitable project for someone passionate about classic vehicles and sees it as a solid foundation for a restoration journey.
Neutral: @OEX, the seller, provides detailed insights about the vehicle's condition and history, noting previous maintenance and improvements made since acquiring it. They acknowledge the rust concerns raised by others but assure potential buyers that the issue may not be as severe as suggested. @Lachssilber displays interest in the vehicle's specifications and expresses a desire to convert it into a rally car, indicating a mix of enthusiasm for the vehicle's potential and acknowledgment of its current state.
Negative: @UncleFred1 points out discrepancies in the vehicle's listing, particularly criticizing the representation of its transmission type and emphasizing the extensive work needed to restore the car to collectible condition. They caution prospective buyers about the significant investment required for restoration, while @badali shares frustration over failed bidding attempts, hinting at difficulties in engaging with the auction process. The collective commentary suggests a blend of admiration for the car's unique qualities juxtaposed with significant concerns regarding its restoration needs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed strong enthusiasm for the Camaro, highlighting its appealing aesthetics and powerful build. @boaboyoz described it as a 'sexy beast', emphasizing his admiration for the car's killer construction. @funkaholik reminisced about the excitement these types of cars inspired in him as a child, affirming their love for it. Additionally, @Bubba2358 appreciated the color of the car, expressing excitement about it and showing a willingness to engage further with the seller.
Neutral: There were inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifications and details, indicating a general interest in understanding the Camaro's performance. @C43EZRider asked about its quarter-mile capability, while @revracer was curious about the drivetrain, noting that they were suddenly interested in the car despite initial reservations about its color. The seller, @FullBlownChaosFL, provided detailed responses to these inquiries, clarifying modifications to the wheel wells and sharing specifications about the engine and transmission.
Negative: Some comments reflected a lack of interest due to specific features. @bret4138 expressed love for the car but a dislike for the green color, indicating that a different color would have made them a bidder. @tritfright4 raised a concern about potential modifications to the wheel wells, questioning if they had been cut or enlarged. Additionally, @Bubba2358's later comments suggested concerns about whether the fuel cell installation met safety regulations, indicating a cautious approach to the vehicle's compliance with necessary standards.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their enthusiasm for the 1995 Mercedes-Benz E320 Cabriolet, praising its appearance and condition. @JaDawgPNW noted the car's classy presentation, while @Luz_do_sol highlighted its beautiful color combination of Polar White and Black. The seller, @GenauAutoWerks, emphasized the vehicle's solid maintenance history, indicating that various components, including the soft top, hydraulics, and gaskets, have been cared for appropriately. This level of upkeep and the vehicle's aesthetic appeal contribute to a positive impression among potential buyers.
Neutral: There were several inquiries about the vehicle's maintenance history, specifically regarding parts like the convertible top hydraulic cylinders and biodegradable wiring harness. @gtwalkeriii asked if the hydraulic cylinders had been serviced, while @josefkklein inquired about the head gasket replacement, leading to clarifications from the seller. @JacksonWagon also requested additional close-up images of the dashboard and controls, which indicates that prospective buyers are actively seeking more detailed information about the car before placing bids.
Negative: Concerns were raised about certain mechanical aspects of the car. @josefkklein questioned the necessity of the head gasket replacement, while others expressed their worries over the functionality of components like the convertible top and power antenna that need attention. While the seller confirmed that no warning lights were present, the issue regarding the third brake light and potential smog testing in California remained uncertain, fostering apprehension among bidders about the vehicle's complete reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments for its impressive build and overall quality. @Likeparty described it as a radical and well-equipped build, while @Astonjag remarked on its cleanliness and the variety of features catering to Mustang enthusiasts. @Donalaston praised the car as a great driver, highlighting its reliability due to the old school 5.0 302 engine, and commended the seller for creating a down-to-earth vehicle that can be driven daily. @CaseyKacz, who has previously bought a car from the seller, vouched for the seller's pride in their work, further adding to the positive impressions of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the details of the vehicle's features and construction. @ValpoMike and @joshr9876 engaged in a discussion about specific components, such as the red circles behind the grill, identified as Hella Horns. @ewh49 raised questions about potential rust issues and the modifications made around the windshield and rear glass installation. The seller, @AwolAtWork, provided detailed responses about the car's history and any repairs undertaken, confirming that careful consideration was taken with any rust work and that the original dash is in a bare metal finish, much like the original R models.
Negative: Conversely, some comments highlighted concerns regarding specific mechanical aspects of the vehicle. @blackeyeii noted the absence of wipers and questioned the functionality of the defroster, while @Kenbike asked about the heating system. @hendrix427 expressed skepticism regarding the auction price, suggesting the car's value may be higher than current bids indicated. @badboat25 inquired about the car's structural integrity, questioning if it is a full frame vehicle. The seller clarified that Mustangs are unibody cars with added sub-frame connectors, addressing the concerns raised.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @srmartin69 (The Seller) expresses gratitude for the interest in the car and provides clear details about its features, such as its braking system with four-wheel disk brakes. The engagement from the seller indicates a professional attitude and a willingness to assist potential buyers, contributing positively to the selling experience.
Neutral: Several comments touch on the car's mileage and the reliability of the Carfax report. @jpr and @RWD-FTW highlight concerns about how mileage inconsistencies may affect perception. @analoglp mentions the process of correcting Carfax discrepancies, suggesting a level of trust in the system when proper documentation is provided, while @Caymanorcarrera points out the importance of accuracy in reports.
Negative: @MM4 raises significant concerns regarding the condition of the car, specifically inquiring about rust and the condition of the top, pointing out possible patches. @peckyandmutt questions the originality of the body panels and seeks confirmation through paint thickness readings. Additionally, @dg185252 questions the absence of ABS features, and @ChrisW802 inquires about the LSD, indicating a search for clarity on potential issues or missing features.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bohscruzen commented that the vehicle looks sharp, showcasing an interest in its aesthetic appeal. @Dollycat3 described the 4Runner as a beauty, emphasizing its visual appeal. @amotorsports (The Seller) highlighted the vehicle's exceptional condition, mentioning that it is low-mileage, well-maintained, and has a clean title. The recent full repaint using high-quality materials suggests that the vehicle has been cared for properly, enhancing its allure to potential buyers. The seller is proactive in engaging with commenters and sharing details about the vehicle's maintenance, which reflects positively on its overall representation.
Neutral: Several commenters were focused on clarifying details about the vehicle, such as @NickW1 and @ETown_Lonnie discussing the 2WD feature. They emphasized the need for better clarity in the listing about the vehicle's drive type, which could affect its marketability. @carstruck suggested that there should be more detailed photographs, particularly of the chassis, to provide a better understanding of the vehicle's condition. @beej raised questions about the ownership trail and title history, while @Dave18SF requested information about the tire date codes and potential leaks, indicating a general interest in the vehicle's reliability and maintenance history.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects, there were also several concerns raised about the vehicle. @carstruck pointed out the limitations of a 2WD vehicle for off-roading or winter conditions, implying potential drawbacks for certain buyers. @Mac357 noted that the vehicle appeared to be leaning to one side based on the photos, which could suggest underlying issues. @WIZZZZ inquired about the oil change history for the first 100k miles, reflecting apprehension about long-term care. Lastly, @mattd_muse5 asked about the missing backseat headrests, adding to the list of concerns regarding the vehicle's completeness and condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed satisfaction regarding the vehicle's smog certification. @samgamps, the seller, reassured @ski.dive that the truck had recently passed smog on 9.9.25, providing photo evidence to bolster this claim. This communication indicates that the seller is proactive and willing to support the buyer's needs. Additionally, the seller was responsive to queries and supplied videos demonstrating the truck's performance, engaging with various user requests and inquiries about the vehicle.
Neutral: There were discussions about the vehicle's performance, particularly regarding its four-wheel drive system. @sjack3en sought clarification about the intermittent functioning of the system, to which @samgamps explained that the 4Lo engages without issue, but the 4Hi may not engage consistently. Although responses such as these suggest some uncertainty, they also illustrate that the seller is transparent about known issues and is taking steps to provide additional information to interested buyers. Commenters also debated the vehicle's horsepower ratings, indicating a broader discussion around the specifics of the truck's specifications.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's four-wheel drive system not engaging properly, particularly in 4Hi mode. @broj queried if 4Hi was not engaging even from neutral, causing further concern about the vehicle's reliability. Various comments, including those from @Aminfla regarding the VIN tag and general performance issues, hinted at potential mechanical woes. The seller acknowledged these challenges, attributing them to possibly outdated electrical components while ensuring that mechanical operations were sound. Overall, doubts linger regarding the vehicular system's reliability, particularly the 4Hi engagement, which the seller suggested might be a common issue in similar models.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @skosieruxo commented on the car being a nice fixer upper, highlighting its potential for enthusiasts. @CliffElam appreciated that this project Ferrari stands out, suggesting it's a unique opportunity for those who like to bring cars back to life. Additionally, @Familyman mentioned that this car would be ideal for a multi-skilled DIYer who enjoys restoring neglected vehicles, emphasizing its appeal for those interested in the restoration process.
Neutral: @KJLaBry mentioned the need for more undercarriage photos, indicating awareness of the vehicle's condition, particularly concerning corrosion. @WeirdReverendAl shared insights on the car's previous maintenance, noting it was stored indoors for years, which may suggest better preservation than expected. @SBDiscovery (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the tires holding air and the possibility of storage, addressing concerns of potential buyers.
Negative: @Mister_Ed expressed disappointment about the car's deterioration, indicating it was a shame to see such a rare vehicle in its current state. @Wolfman2332 felt that the car's age made it a questionable project, suggesting they believed it might not be salvageable. @Fleche_dOr criticized the idea of buying restoration projects, reflecting skepticism about the feasibility of realizing a return on investment for fixing up such a vehicle.
![]() |
LS427-Powered 1999 Chevrolet Corvette Fixed Roof Coupe 6-Speed
1G1YY12G4X5131501
Lot 216972
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the impressive performance and engineering of the vehicle. @Crovet praised the build quality, indicating that it is 'made for racing, not a cruiser', which suggests that the car is well-suited for its intended purpose. @tobyallen and @SpeedWorksRacing both expressed enthusiasm about the car's capabilities, with the latter noting how it 'RIPS' and @tobyallen admiring the shifter performance in the driving videos. Furthermore, the headlight conversion received positive feedback from @MartyKC, who described it as a 'natural fit' along with the attractive color of the car, indicating overall aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Comments about the car's features and specifications were common, with several users inquiring about the vehicle's components and statistics. @lambolover77 asked about horsepower, to which @travisss confirmed a conservative tune yielding 532 horsepower. There were also questions concerning the car's handling characteristics, corner balance, and weight ratio, which @travisss addressed, indicating an overall positive performance outlook. Additionally, inquiries regarding the AC compressor and its potential reinstatement underscored a practical consideration without negative connotations from the seller.
Negative: However, not all perceptions were completely favorable; concerns were raised about potential wear and tear from the car's racing history. @Stealthjr questioned the vehicle's condition after extensive use, hinting at uncertainty about its durability. @JohnathanS pointed out some marks under the hood that raised additional questions about possible fluid leaks, which @travisss attributed to prior power steering issues but reassured that the issue had since been resolved. Such scrutiny suggests that while many appreciate the car's capabilities, potential buyers may have reservations about its comprehensive track readiness.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered admiration for its character and history. Commentors like @K-M-A-Y highlight the truck's unique soul, appreciating the stories behind its dings and flaws. @Kubikmotorsports commends the solid design and perfect ranch vibe of the 1967 F100, while @T_McCool notes that it’s impressive to see a nearly 60-year-old truck in such good survivor condition, especially compared to the rusting vehicles commonly found in the rust belt. @Majuba reminisces fondly about their past truck, praising its ranch functionality and nostalgic features.
Neutral: The seller, @Cammergalaxie, has provided detailed insights into the truck's condition and history. They clarify that the truck needs various repairs, including issues with the transmission, seals, and mufflers, and mention that the truck is being sold as a project vehicle. Commentors like @moneybags seek further clarification on the truck's performance and specifics, pondering about potential travel capabilities after minor maintenance. There are discussions about the truck's original specs, like the engine size, which @rare57 points out might have inconsistencies.
Negative: Concerns about the truck's condition have been raised, particularly regarding its functionality and the potential costs of repairs. @moneybags critiques the overall mechanical health, questioning the seller about the noise from the transmission and whether it needs a rebuild. Additionally, they express skepticism about the truck's readiness for long-distance travel after repairs. The seller acknowledges these concerns, emphasizing the need for careful consideration before undertaking any long trips, reiterating that it is a project that requires substantive work.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @edsmithiii described the vehicle as a "slick ride" which indicates a strong appreciation for its design and style. @DUGEEEFRESH04 simply referred to it as a "perfect truck," suggesting a high level of satisfaction with its overall performance and features.
Neutral: @TeamSled inquired about the reason for the quick sale and the details regarding a transferable warranty, indicating a potential buyer's curiosity about the vehicle's value and condition. @NJTruckGuy also requested additional pictures in better lighting, which suggests an interest in the vehicle but does not express a strong opinion either way.
Negative: @Longito123 expressed skepticism about the labeling of the vehicle as a "FINAL EDITION," noting that the TRX model is set to return in 2026, implying that the marketing may have been misleading. @rcwoodjr shared a personal experience with a "Final Edition" model, echoing @Longito123's sentiment regarding the authenticity of the 'finality' in the vehicle's branding.
![]() |
Supercharged 427-Powered 2003 Ferrari 360 GT Michelotto Conversion
ZFFYR51B000119071
Lot 216889
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed strong enthusiasm for the vehicle, praising its unique construction and hybrid nature. @ABPhoto compared it to a creative collision of a Corvette C5.R and Ferrari 360 GT, highlighting its intriguing design and innovative engineering. @rofandofy expressed excitement over using it for 'smoky burnouts at an upscale Italian Cars & Coffee,' while @otoupalik emphasized the superior craftsmanship and performance, noting the car was built to a very high level with no expense spared. Users like @Johnny1eye and @Jimmilew pointed out its potential as a thrilling track car, with @Jimmilew reflecting on the vehicle's appeal amidst prevalent negativity on auction sites.
Neutral: Several contributors provided neutral comments, seeking clarification about the specifics of the vehicle's build and performance capabilities. @MalibuRS (The Seller) clarified misconceptions about the involvement of Michelotto in the vehicle's conversion, asserting that although OEM parts from Michelotto were utilized, the process did not include Ferrari's direct involvement. Others, like @Pista2020 and @FeloniousMonk, expressed mild interest but did not delve into specifics, suggesting the vehicle could be an attractive proposition at a reasonable price. Comparisons with other cars, such as the requests for details on lap times compared to vehicles like the C6Z, also kept the conversation analytical rather than purely speculative.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters expressed skepticism about the practicalities of the car, raising questions about the legality and feasibility of street usage given its modifications. @bobzdar questioned the absence of original components, specifically the factory Michelotto engine, while @jacko241 and @Marcellino conveyed disbelief about the engine swap and the overall modifications, calling the swap 'sacrilegious.' Additionally, some users like @c-ray62 and @mkeenly were flagged for non-constructive negativity, indicating a divide in the community regarding the vehicle's value and desirability. @the_ryanh lamented the lack of communication from the seller, expressing frustration over unreturned inquiries.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express excitement and appreciation for the vehicle, as noted by @duneracer445 who enthusiastically states that this car is a reason to get up in the morning. @QueenElizabeth3 also contributes positively, noting the car's value and mentioning a good deal she found on original rims in the market. Additionally, @4WHEEL_GERMAN, the seller, provides reassurance by confirming that the car has no issues with the Eaton supercharger, air suspension, or other mechanical components, promoting confidence in the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Several potential buyers, such as @DBeste and @snelson203, seek more information regarding specific details about the car. @DBeste asks for clearer photos of the driver’s seat to assess its wear and inquiries about the undercoating, while @snelson203 is interested in the availability of original rims. @Thomasa3 adds to the mix by requesting videos related to the vehicle’s startup and any potential mechanical noises, indicating a thorough due diligence in the buying process.
Negative: There are some concerns raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly around the potential for repairs or issues related to common components. @AGARWAL2032 lists various potential problems, asking if there are issues with the supercharger, air suspension, or any leaks, which reflects a cautious approach from some commenters. Furthermore, @DBeste expresses some confusion over what appears to be drips of paint, speculating whether this might indicate a prior undercoating application, suggesting some skepticism about the car's maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @johnnyvett describes the vehicle as a cool project car, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @Jbmcjs appreciates the car's potential, noting that all important components seem to be present and expressing that it may not take much effort to get the vehicle running again. He further highlights the quality of the door gaps and shut lines, asserting that the vehicle is a solid option for anyone looking to restore it.
Neutral: @Uglide1996 inquires about specific parts for the AC system, questioning whether the original block is still with the vehicle. @Ektl6900 remarks on the car's long neglect but notes that everything necessary is still there for someone willing to take on the project. The seller, @1966saab, confirms the car was stored for 17 years but was running when it was parked, indicating that they will provide the best answers possible to any inquiries.
Negative: Comments indicate concern over the vehicle's long period of disuse, with @Ektl6900 expressing disappointment that the car was unattended for so long. @Amptroll777 questions whether the car’s original motor is matching, hinting at potential concerns regarding authenticity. Additional comments signal that while the vehicle holds potential as a project, its condition and incomplete AC system may pose challenges for interested buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @dannyluce63, the seller, conveys genuine enthusiasm for the vehicle. He describes it as looking and running great, highlighting that it was restored about 15 years ago without removing the body from the frame, making it a solid driver for shows and road use. The engine was rebuilt with only 6k miles since then, and recent brake services were performed to keep it in good condition. The seller also appreciates the assistance from the senior STOA inspector who affirmed its authenticity and is open to inquiries, creating an engaging atmosphere for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters provide insights into the vehicle's unique features and restoration history. @Phyzik points out nuances regarding its construction as a possible Mk1 crossover car, while @pappentl shares personal experience with a similar model, indicating that the auctioned car's characteristics are consistent with others from that period. @TigerGary and @justahonda discuss the notion of TAC inspections, stressing their importance in reinforcing the car's authenticity, even if not all previous commenters agree on the product's pure Tiger identity.
Negative: However, caution is voiced repeatedly regarding the car's certification and authenticity claims. @austinhealer and others express skepticism, indicating that the vehicle may incorporate Alpine parts rather than being a pure Tiger, which could affect its market value. Comments from @KenBond and @pantiger highlight concerns about missing undercarriage photos, while @Sunbeamdon points out the potential difficulty in selling without a completed TAC certification. This mixed assessment of vehicle origin fuels uncertainty among potential bidders, prompting suggestions that interested buyers should proceed with caution and seek expert inspection before committing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Clarion (The Seller) presents a stunning 7,000 mile Cadillac Eldorado, emphasizing its exceptional condition as a true time capsule. @dantebat praises the car's beauty, and @wem5310 echoes this sentiment, referring to it as a beautiful time capsule. The seller assures potential buyers that the car's interior looks as pristine as it did upon leaving the assembly line, with the exterior reflecting its low mileage. The seller also mentions the installation of new tires, further highlighting the care taken to maintain the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: @coraduck12 raises a question regarding the oil change sticker found in the door jam, suggesting the possibility that the car may have over 107,000 miles. However, @Clarion (The Seller) clarifies the mileage history, explaining the details of previous ownership and the low miles put on the car since 2001. The seller provides transparency on the car's history and asserts that it has been stored in a climate-controlled environment and hasn't encountered rain or snow, addressing potential concerns about her mileage claim.
Negative: Some commenters express skepticism regarding the mileage of the car, with @coraduck12 questioning the accuracy based on an oil change record. This raises doubts about the true mileage of the Cadillac despite the seller's detailed explanations. While the seller is confident in the car's condition and history, the concerns from potential buyers may cast a shadow over its perceived authenticity as a low-mileage vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @sludgo expresses a nostalgic fondness for MGs, reminiscing about how a friend's car made him appreciate the brand. He fondly recalls a memorable date involving the MG TD, which also apparently captured the attention of his date. @heartt44 admires the beauty of the vehicle and expresses curiosity about its weatherproofing capabilities, indicating a positive impression of the car's aesthetic and condition.
Neutral: @dbehning (The Seller) responds to inquiries about maintenance records and history, mentioning that most records pertain to work done in the 1970s, and detailing recent upgrades such as the installation of MGB front suspension and some replacement parts. He addresses @heartt44's question about rain protection, explaining the presence of side curtains and the condition of the folding top, which retains its quality despite its age. Additional information is provided about the original parts, specifying what remains and what has been changed.
Negative: While the feedback is primarily positive, @dbran6172 raises a concern by asking if the original steering wheel and wheels are still available, implying uncertainty about the originality of the car's components. This could suggest that potential buyers may prioritize keeping the vehicle as original as possible. Overall, there's no outright negative sentiment towards the vehicle, but the queries hint at aspects some might consider drawbacks.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's condition and rarity. @308GTBi called it a "magnificent example," and @JWHBOOMER commented on the car's appearance after watching a video, indicating they found it appealing. @BDATX shared a personal connection, recalling a similar model they loved, emphasizing the excitement for this opportunity. The seller, @59caddyman, provided assurance about the vehicle's maintenance and condition, explaining the extensive work done, including a recent full service and the quality of repairs for hail damage, which left no visible trace.
Neutral: Several inquiries focused on the car's features and functionality. For instance, @Tyreguy asked about the process of cleaning the fuel tank, while @bigjohn69 and @jimcarrubba inquired about the retractable top and engine details, respectively. The seller addressed these concerns promptly, confirming that the retractable top was fully serviced and operates without issues, and that the entire vehicle had been thoroughly inspected. This open communication helps potential buyers feel informed about the car's readiness and functionality.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about specific aspects of the car. @Mcest2025 questioned the availability of a second key, noting the potential extra cost, which the seller responded to with a practical perspective. @bigjohn69 asked for a video demonstration of the retractable top, which the seller was unable to provide immediately but promised to do so later. These inquiries reflect a demand for further assurance regarding some of the car's features, indicating that while the overall sentiment is positive, potential buyers are cautious and seeking clarity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mattowens1023 expressed admiration for the car, stating it is so beautiful that it inspired him to look up how to transmission swap an E46, highlighting its excellent shape and stunning color combo. @CRE asked a clarifying question about the condition of the BMW badge on the trunk, which suggests he is still interested and paying close attention to detail. @Jdtau commented on the E46 design, saying it is one of the few 20+ year old designs that still holds up today and also praised the color of the particular vehicle being auctioned.
Neutral: @Znaib inquired whether the vehicle was previously sold a few weeks ago, indicating a familiarity with the car's history. The seller provided a clear response stating that this particular vehicle had not been auctioned before and was sourced directly from the owner, thereby clarifying any misconceptions. @Scliffe raised concerns about the use of earlier reviews for a different engine model and pointed out that such discrepancies could mislead potential buyers, showing his engagement with the auction process and desire for accuracy.
Negative: @Scliffe expressed frustration regarding the repeated use of inappropriate reviews in the auction, suggesting this issue could harm the reputation of the auction site. He criticized the mix-up as a consistent problem that the site needs to address properly. Additionally, there was minor confusion about the condition of the car's BMW badge, which, although addressed by the seller, indicates a potential area of concern regarding the vehicle's detailing during the photography process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 2015 Mercedes Benz X166 GL450, highlighting its attractive Selenite Gray Metallic finish and luxurious features like the Harman Kardon LOGIC 7 Surround system and panoramic sunroof. @Dave18SF noted the vehicle's great service history, showing that it was well-maintained at both a Mercedes dealership and a reputable shop. @BeauSmith94 commended the car's performance, with the seller confirming that there are no issues with the timing chain or engine operation, indicating a well-functioning vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @aegmotorsports, provided comprehensive details about the vehicle's specifications, packages, and features, demonstrating transparency. They assured potential buyers that all features work as expected, addressing inquiries regarding maintenance and repairs with diligence. @Ryebird's confusion about the auction status was clarified, and @NEOBob raised a valid question about the A/C maintenance history, which the seller answered by assuring that the A/C is functioning correctly.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by potential buyers, particularly regarding past inspection failures. @Dave18SF specifically questioned the alignment issues that were previously reported but assured by the seller that it was resolved before sale. Additionally, there were inquiries about the A/C recharge history from @NEOBob, which displayed a cautious approach from commenters regarding the vehicle's past maintenance and any potential underlying issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @AHill007 remarked on the vehicle's amazing appearance, complimenting the seller's effort. @Danielito appreciated the gorgeous presentation and expressed enthusiasm for one of their favorite cars in a fitting colorway. Multiple commenters highlighted the car’s beauty and driving performance, with @Tomme9 noting the buyer is getting a great car, and @911r (The Seller) indicating the car was lovingly cared for and is a joy to drive. @jminpdx praised the vehicle's looks and mentioned that its color alteration has minimal drawbacks, indicating it is easily registrable in California.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed technical aspects of the vehicle. @HBChris noted that while the car's exhaust system is loud, it is nonetheless a well-executed driving video that reflects the model beautifully. @e9er inquired about the wheels, and @911r (The Seller) confirmed they are stamped OZ, with BBS style caps, while providing details about modifications like the Hushpower exhaust for enhanced sound. @jcIS raised concerns about rusted bolts and the dash, asking if those issues are easily fixable while confirming that all accessories are operational.
Negative: On the downside, there were some criticisms regarding the vehicle's details. @davidhunternyc expressed love for the car but criticized the steering wheel. @BBK noted that while the repaint in Anthracite looks great, the exhaust system's current configuration might detract from the experience. @golfmanbob initially struggled to access the driving video, although later he expressed love for the exhaust note. @rubydaddio and @HBChris discussed potential regulatory issues for registering the vehicle in California, with @rubydaddio expressing frustration over the complications of smog regulations for older cars.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @michaelmotorcar has presented the 2015 Porsche Cayenne turbo with enthusiasm, highlighting its excellent condition and the low mileage of just 58,000 miles. He encourages potential bidders to view pictures and videos thoroughly, emphasizing transparency and inviting pre-bidding inspections. The detailed descriptions, including mentions of the vehicle's extensive option list, showcase the effort put into marketing this vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @ADunk670 and @doghouse1, inquire about specific features and maintenance records, indicating a keen interest in the vehicle's condition and history. @ADunk670 asks about service records related to the transfer case, while @doghouse1 follows up on this with a question about whether it was replaced. @artur_16 appreciates the presentation and asks for clarification about the Car Connect option and Apple CarPlay availability, reflecting a general interest in technical details.
Negative: Some commenters have expressed concerns about specific issues related to the vehicle. @ADunk670 and @DJRHOADES have both raised questions about the transfer case and the rear bumper damage that have yet to be fully addressed. @dangramm expressed disappointment about the absence of a Sport Exhaust, and comments about potentially missing images of blemishes have stirred some anxiety among bidders, which suggests that not all inquiries receive prompt responses, leading to frustration.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @chmteacher finds the vehicle aesthetically pleasing, commenting that it is 'such a good looking vehicle.' @sammyeurocar appreciates the 'nice color' of the Defender, and @WAGONBOYTD compliments the color as well, indicating that it looks great on the 110 model. The seller, @ApexAutoVault, emphasizes the vehicle's reliability, stating it drives well, starts smoothly, and is ideal for long highway trips. Having used it as a daily driver, they confirm it's in excellent condition and that it recently underwent professional repainting, enhancing its overall appearance. They further encourage potential buyers to bid confidently, assuring them that this Defender can be a reliable vehicle for years to come.
Neutral: Multiple commenters engage in discussions about the vehicle's origin and specifications. @djazbar questions why the seller is selling the Defender after a short period, prompting @WAGONBOYTD to clarify that they have owned it for six years, which is substantial in the Defender community. @misanthrope asks about the presence of factory air conditioning, to which @ApexAutoVault responds that while it does not have it, air conditioning can be added. Additionally, @jp00033 inquires about the manufacturing location, leading @ApexAutoVault to confirm it was built by Otokar in the Middle East, which they prefer over some other locations for quality and condition.
Negative: @djazbar expresses skepticism about the seller's quick decision to sell the vehicle, which may raise questions about its reliability or condition despite multiple reassurances. However, respondents like @WAGONBOYTD and @ApexAutoVault defend the seller's long ownership duration, indicating that the concerns may not reflect the vehicle's actual state. Therefore, while there are doubts about the sale's timing, the seller maintains confidence in the Defender’s quality, noting its reliability and the lack of issues experienced during their ownership.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @427cobrasnake (The Seller) has highlighted the quality, craftsmanship, and attention to detail in the truck's build, indicating that it is a no-expense-spared project that offers a modern driving experience. @boaboyoz appreciates the classic white color and praises the overall build, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. Additionally, @surfnbike describes the truck as classy and notes its association with the 'dent side' generation, expressing surprise regarding the use of a Chevy frame instead of a Super Duty.
Neutral: @chasselkins inquires about the rear bench seat's functionality, specifically asking if it folds flat, to which @427cobrasnake responds affirmatively. @Skillman25 provides constructive feedback regarding the truck's design, appreciating the workmanship while noting some technical choices, and @Stallion101 confirms that the truck features a half-ton suspension and drivetrain, receiving confirmation from @427cobrasnake. @Paul_Dietzel humorously references an old advertisement and queries about the term 'dent side,' revealing curiosity about terminology related to the truck's design.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the use of a Chevy motor, with @Justuego expressing disapproval by stating "Eeeeeewwwwwwww" in reaction to its incorporation into what is otherwise a Ford truck. Additionally, @Skillman25 suggests that while the quality is high, the engine placement could be a drawback for traditionalists who prefer an original Ford engine. @rosco76 inquires about the mileage on the drivetrain, hinting at potential worries about its reliability and performance, although @427cobrasnake assures that the drivetrain has been rebuilt and resealed, dismissing any concerns about the wear of used parts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 praises the vehicle as a prime example of Volvo's quality, remarking on its excellent condition considering its age and the appealing green color which adds a touch of class. They believe the car has plenty of life left, describing it as a gem rather than just a preserved model. @aSingh39 (The Seller) highlights the low mileage of this XC90 and the enthusiasm surrounding the auction, encouraging potential buyers to ask questions and engage with the listing.
Neutral: @Mjollnir provides technical insights about the vehicle, confirming that the T6 has a twin-turbo inline six engine and discussing the GM-derived 4-speed transmission, indicating a standard aspect of the car that potential buyers might want to know. @16thvacavalry raises a query about the condition of the transmission, suggesting it could be a concern given its reputation.
Negative: @Jeepers84 expresses concern regarding the timing belt interval, querying if it has been maintained appropriately, while @aSingh39 (The Seller) admits to lacking records of the timing belt, which may raise doubts among potential bidders regarding maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @drfilg00d (The Seller) has been responsive and helpful in providing potential buyers with information about the vehicle's parts. They shared pictures of the spare parts when asked by @MajorMindup, demonstrating their willingness to assist prospective buyers with visual details to enhance their understanding of what’s included with the bike. Additionally, @drfilg00d engaged with @whilst by sharing a personal anecdote, contributing to a friendly exchange that could positively influence buyers regarding the seller's personality and reliability.
Neutral: The conversation reflects some mixed traffic regarding the vehicle's condition. @Harry_ pointed out that the carburetors might need cleaning due to reported rideability issues below operating temperature. In response, @drfilg00d acknowledged this concern, indicating that when evaluated by a local shop, a carb clean was recommended to address the sputtering problem when the bike is cold. This indicates that the seller is attentively considering feedback about the bike’s performance, which may inform potential buyers that maintenance work is anticipated.
Negative: Despite the positive exchanges, there is a notable concern regarding the bike's performance as described by @Harry_ and corroborated by @drfilg00d. The acknowledgment of the sputtering issue when cold could be seen as a downside for buyers looking for a fully reliable vehicle. The seller admitted to not having had the time to address this issue, which might raise concerns about the overall care and maintenance of the bike before sale. This lack of resolution might deter some potential buyers who are wary of taking on immediate repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters greatly admire the vehicle's performance and specifications, highlighting it as a 'spectacular Rothsport built weapon' and a 'real hot rod.' @dmccart812 expresses excitement about the car's stunning capabilities, while @S.M. praises the impressive 324 horsepower, suggesting that it is a real-world figure and reflects the quality of the build. Many comments celebrate the car's unique design elements, such as the 9" Fuchs wheels and the Signal Yellow color, which @mark_99 refers to as historic and striking. Enthusiasts also appreciate the driving video shared by @blip (The Seller), which showcases the car's responsiveness and capability, leaving viewers in awe. Overall, there's a strong consensus that this vehicle is an exceptional example of Porsche craftsmanship and Rothsport's vision.
Neutral: Comments provide details about the build, noting that the vehicle was crafted on a 1973 LWB chassis and features a 3.8L engine with various performance modifications. @Frida points out that the car is more reliable and usable than a real 1973 RS, while also commending its cosmetic features and suspension setup. @blip (The Seller) responds to inquiries regarding the car's weight, setup for AC, and potential modifications, indicating a willingness to accommodate buyer requests. The dialogue reflects an engaged community interested in the vehicle's history, functionality, and potential bidding dynamics. The ongoing auction and shared insights signal anticipation among potential bidders without overtly expressing urgency or competitiveness.
Negative: While the overwhelming sentiment is positive, some comments hint at concerns about the car's practicality for colder climates, with @2swoosh inquiring about the feasibility of re-installing the heater box. @blip (The Seller) reassures that necessary components for heating are present but suggests modifications would be at the buyer's expense. Additionally, there are notes on the perceived limitations of the 915 transmission when paired with higher horsepower engines, although some users, like @lsaxen, counter this by sharing their positive experiences with similar setups. Overall, these doubts are minor compared to the enthusiasm shown by most commenters.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters are impressed with the vehicle, praising its original condition and overall presentation. @MrBCut states that the car is beautifully original, while @01996tt describes it as beautifully presented and highlights the stunning interior. @JT12345 reiterates the vehicle's desirability and commends the seller's care for it, indicating a strong belief in the car's quality and appeal. Other users like @bmdaia and @3pedalstable appreciate the classic colorways and commend the car's specifications and maintenance history provided by the seller, @PanAm747, who emphasizes the vehicle's excellent condition and full service records.
Neutral: Several commenters seek additional information or clarification regarding specific aspects of the vehicle. @Pcleez asks about coolant lines, while @Swjohnson1948 requests a new cold start video with the camera focused on the exhaust pipes. @juliogo33 raises a concern about a potential hood gap, asking if the bumper has been replaced, and @Colston49 analyzes the DME report, questioning its implications. The seller, @PanAm747, actively engages with these inquiries, assuring them of the car's well-maintained status and providing service records and responses to their questions.
Negative: Some users express concerns about certain elements related to the vehicle's history or condition. @MazdaMonkey expresses skepticism about the DME report's implications, suggesting that any history of over-revs may be cause for concern. @juliogo33 questions the hood gap, implying it may indicate previous accidents, which the seller refutes. A few others, like @zackan, criticize the nitpicking over the car's issues and suggest that anyone genuinely interested should get a pre-purchase inspection, implying that overly critical comments may distract from the car's overall qualities.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its performance and unique characteristics. @MINI1964 praised the impressive roar of the engine during acceleration, while @Arnage reminisced about watching races in the fifties and appreciated the car's example with its patina. @pjbowman described the car as interesting, noting the substantial custom work that has been done, and mentioned that despite not needing more cars, he might be tempted to purchase if the price remains low. @Electra-glide also shared positive feedback, calling the car a beautiful representation of a classic English racer.
Neutral: Several comments touched on the vehicle's specifications and legality for use on the streets. @findrussel raised logistical concerns regarding the car being registered in Washington State while located in Phoenix, AZ. @Edelbrock asked about the car's road legality in Washington and inquired about the original engine, while @Roadburn66 questioned the absence of turn signals for street legality. Additionally, @SWVintage (The Seller) confirmed that the car is street legal in Washington and clarified engine-related queries about its specifications and modifications.
Negative: On the negative side, some commenters expressed concerns about the potential cooling issues that could arise from the vehicle's modifications. @Dr.golf questioned the effectiveness of cooling with larger engines, particularly about whether the owner experienced issues while racing, to which @SWVintage (The Seller) noted the car has been documented in numerous races but still sought clarification from the owner. Furthermore, @RichardPetty criticized the hood slogan, describing it as rude, hinting at mixed feelings about the car's cultural elements.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Purpleman appreciated seeing the vehicle being enjoyed by its owner, expressing a sense of nostalgia and good luck wishes for the sale. @lunchbocks2002 highlighted its uniqueness as a one-owner car that's been driven, viewing it as an opportunity for someone to acquire a Gen II at a fair price. @ArmoredForSleep shared a positive sentiment about the vehicle's presence in Florida, reminiscing about their own Viper and wishing success for the seller.
Neutral: @newcarpro provided a detailed list of the vehicle's specifications and standard equipment, giving potential buyers insight into its features. @Speedjunkie12 (The Seller) mentioned that the battery was recently replaced and confirmed the car is drivable, reinforcing the vehicle's operational status. @dmastrianni expressed some interest in acquiring a video of the car being driven, indicating an engagement in the bidding process while considering concerns around maintenance.
Negative: @pmiller criticized the lack of comprehensive and well-lit photos of the car and indicated that the corrosion described was understated. @The_Dude_Abides shared concerns about a particular photo that may not inspire confidence in the vehicle's condition, while @Brian_Johnson compared the car's condition to being submerged in saltwater, suggesting needed repairs and cautioning potential buyers. @Cars3D expressed confusion about images showing a plastic bag under the car, questioning the state of the vehicle's underside and indicating it appears to be in worse shape compared to others seen in previous sales.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters express excitement and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its charm and potential. @GBRBiLL praises the Traveller and feels inspired to restore his own, while @rlincoln shares his positive experience over the years with his similar model, noting the car's solid wood and rust-free condition as key selling points. @alanbob commends the clever use of a clothespin for the choke control, indicating a resourceful approach to maintaining the vehicle. @Hotrod4fun also appreciates the visual aesthetics of the car and suggests that posting a cold start video could enhance the auction experience, showcasing the car's unique features further.
In a neutral tone, various questions are posed regarding the vehicle's details and specifications. @Bobbity inquires about the removed trafficators, to which @NutmegCT (The Seller) clarifies that they are no longer included. @BobbyG8297 requests more information about the condition of the rear doors and tires, revealing a thoughtful interest in the vehicle's state before purchase. @59elva reflects on a past vehicle conversion, expressing a balance of curiosity and caution towards the Traveller's driving perspective and experience. These comments show a general engagement with the topic without overt enthusiasm or negativity.
However, some comments hint at issues with the vehicle that potential buyers might consider. @rlincoln mentions the challenges involved in accessing the master cylinder due to its location, offering insight into potential maintenance challenges. While he notes that the necessary parts are available, the mention of repair work may deter less experienced owners. Furthermore, @Hotrod4fun, while supportive, emphasizes his own engine upgrades and discusses personal preferences, which may imply that the listed Traveller might require similar attention to optimize performance, possibly leading some to think twice before purchasing it.
Neutral:
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the 1979 Cutlass, highlighting its unique features and excellent condition. @joeveto appreciates the T-tops and notes how rare clean non-442 models are to find. @cattyhighjack250 refers to it as a "freaking clean cutlass" and compares it favorably against family-owned cars, suggesting the seller has a quality vehicle. Others, like @Ramenator and @Myoldcut, share nostalgic sentiments, reminiscing about the classic American muscle car experience, emphasizing the enjoyment of driving a V8-powered G-body with T-tops.
Neutral: There are also several neutral comments that focus on technical inquiries and clarifications about the vehicle. For instance, @vidad and @Ctaylorgraham pose questions about the heating system and the functionality of the gauges, while @jwilk3 asks if everything is running fine outside of a headlight issue. The seller, @ClassicWillie, engages with these comments openly, providing information about maintenance and repair work done, including a recently rebuilt transmission, which adds a layer of reliability to the sale.
Negative: Conversely, some feedback highlights concerns about the vehicle's modifications and missing features. @hairyolds expresses that while the car looks nice, they find the engine bay too cluttered. @ReddiWip raises flags regarding the heating system's lack of function and seeks clarification on the existing issues, indicating potential worries buyers might have about the conditions of the components removed by a previous owner. Overall, these comments suggest a combination of appreciation for the classic aesthetic juxtaposed with caveats about its operational status.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @cleosgeo (The Seller) clearly expresses a deep affection for the vehicle, sharing how they fell in love with it during a visit to Houston where they drove a friend's Boxster. They recount a personal history with Datsun cars, noting that this particular red roadster is a dream come true that allowed them to reconnect with their teenage passion. The Seller emphasizes that owning the car has provided them with joyful experiences driving around Ventura and engaging with fellow car enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters have offered observations about the condition of the car. @bowmonster highlights the importance of considering feedback from prior auctions, suggesting that the car has been thoroughly vetted and has a good reputation. @knuckles-R-Busted points out some details that may need attention, like a missing wheel center cap and some mess in the console, prompting @cleosgeo (The Seller) to acknowledge these concerns while outlining their focus on routine maintenance and repairs, indicating that they are aware of these finer details needing attention.
Negative: There are evident concerns regarding the presentation of the vehicle from some commenters. @knuckles-R-Busted's remarks about the unclean console and missing components may reflect poorly on the Seller's efforts to prepare the car for sale. While @cleosgeo (The Seller) assures the commenter that they are committed to maintenance and care, it raises questions about the overall upkeep of the vehicle and whether it is being represented in its best condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters such as @Lbel85 expressed great admiration for the vehicle, noting it as a 'Beautiful SRT-10' and wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @Collectibleclassics highlighted its impressive Carfax history for a 2004 vehicle, emphasizing the truck's rarity and desirability further. @CarDogThreePedals praised the Dodge as the pinnacle of a performance street truck, appreciating its unique configuration and performance features that are no longer available in modern pickups. @silverarrowcarsltd (The Seller) consistently interacted positively, commending the truck's condition and suggesting it sets a standard for collector trucks.
Neutral: Comments included inquiries about the functionality of safety features like child seat anchors and the passenger airbag disablement from users like @Queuedcars. Others, like @BadAzp, shared specific details about the vehicle’s history and modifications, examining its physical conditions and characteristics. @Vrcbird asked about the tires, wishing to know if they were original or had been updated, while @stevenanastos requested reassurance on the truck's working order and condition, showing a general interest in the vehicle's reliability without expressing overt enthusiasm or criticism.
Negative: Some users raised concerns about the truck's low mileage. @BadAzp questioned the likelihood of a truck with only 1600 miles being driven regularly, suggesting skepticism about its condition and history. Further, @stevenanastos pointedly asked about any potential inoperable features, indicating a cautious approach to the purchase. These comments introduced an element of doubt regarding the truck's usage and features, contrasting the overall enthusiastic tone of other participants.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @nexusautobrokers called the vehicle "sick," showing excitement and enthusiasm for its features. @DUGEEEFRESH04 expressed his approval with an emphatic "oh hell yeah," indicating he finds the car appealing and likely aligns with the positive sentiment others have shared. Overall, these comments reflect a strong enthusiasm from some viewers regarding the car's quality and attributes.
Neutral: @r32fan inquired about specific details like a driving video and the possibility of tuning the car for different fuel types, indicating an interest in practical information without overtly expressing strong positive or negative feelings. The questions suggest that the commenter is considering the vehicle more objectively rather than purely in an emotional sense. This neutral stance can provide insights into what potential buyers are interested in when evaluating the car.
Negative: @Aaron240 questioned the nature of the turbo, implying confusion or dissatisfaction with the description provided, stating: "Not a turbo kit, just a lonely used turbo?" This comment suggests a potential concern about the authenticity or value of the turbo component, which could cast a shadow on the overall perception of the vehicle. Additionally, @carmstrong1008 (The Seller) clarified that the turbo is fresh and remanufactured, attempting to address the negative sentiment from @Aaron240.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ekmcmullen praised the vehicle as a "traction hot rod!" with super cool upgrades and highlighted its solid condition underneath. @DLegeai noted that this particular Traction is well sorted out, making it an enjoyable car to drive. He encourages potential buyers to consider this as a car meant to be driven and enjoys the experience it brings, suggesting that only cosmetic improvements are needed by the new owner. @Biscotte57 also supported the purchase, mentioning that parts are readily available in both the USA and France, making it a bargain for the right buyer.
Neutral: @JohnT, the seller, provided extensive details about the car's history and modifications, sharing that he bought it from a local Citroen group member's widow. He explained the restoration process, including the engine and transmission rebuild, suspension work, and electrical upgrades. He also pointed to the car's provenance, mentioning it was leased by Paramount Television in 1969 and the care taken in enhancing its features for better performance and reliability. Other commenters, such as @Lewis and @GlenK, discussed technical details regarding the engine, transmission, and components, indicating their knowledge and interest in the vehicle's mechanical aspects.
Negative: @tintinmilou raised concerns about the vehicle's transmission fragility, questioning how the engine substitution from an ID19 affects it. @volvoracer9 expressed curiosity about the handling impacted by the tire modifications, echoing the need for original wheels and tires for optimal performance. @Lewis noted that any deviations from the recommended Michelin tires could negatively affect handling. Such mentions could deter potential buyers who are wary of potential issues with the car's mechanical reliability or handling characteristics.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters generally view the vehicle as a compelling and enjoyable project, with @JeAZ expressing that it "looks like a fun project!" and @Tdg finding it "perfect just the way it is." @bowmonster dubbed it the "Swiss army knife of jeeps," demonstrating enthusiasm for its versatility. Additionally, @lykinsj (The Seller) reassured that most components, including hydraulic systems, are in good working condition and historically correct, indicating that the vehicle is practical and ready for use rather than merely a collector's item.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in technical discussions regarding the vehicle's features and specifications. @vetusferrum inquired about the nature of factory versus dealer-installed implements, while @Frogman309 sought clarification on various aspects, including the date code of the tires and maintenance undertaken in the past eight years. @Valkyrja shared insights about vehicle performance in low range, suggesting it’s suitable for trail driving and effective for various tasks, confirming its usability in more traditional settings.
Negative: There were some concerns raised regarding the vehicle's condition and functionality. @Miser questioned a potential issue with gears grinding during shifting, to which @lykinsj (The Seller) clarified that it was merely driver error. Additionally, @Wheels4life queried the purpose of certain cargo area pockets, leading to a discussion about their intended use, highlighting some ambiguity in the vehicle's modifications. Concerns over maintaining the vehicle's originality were voiced by @colojeepguy, urging buyers to avoid unnecessary restorations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @TSR90210 praised the video for showcasing the car's appeal and expressed a wish for more engine sound. @thkfast appreciated the overhead shots that highlighted the car's proportions. @RumbleAuto saw a lot of potential in the vehicle, noting its solid foundation and the no-reserve auction format as positives. @SlowNRusty encouraged viewers to give constructive feedback while highlighting that the vehicle has had significant maintenance and upgrades over the years. @Midengineracer remarked positively on how some aspects of the car have aged well, and many found the MR2 Turbo to be exciting, even considering its retro modifications.
Neutral: @ChrisHallgren provided extensive feedback on possible issues and modifications, showing familiarity with the model. @hlamptey (The Seller) addressed many of the inquiries directly, confirming the car's maintenance status, oil leaks, and functionality of various features. The seller acknowledged questions and shared that they have additional videos showcasing different aspects of the vehicle. Other comments, like @1for2's dialogue about wheel sizes and @mcest2025's questions about the tachometer and window functionality, were mostly clarifications without a strong positive or negative slant.
Negative: Some comments expressed skepticism about the condition of the vehicle. @DatsunZGuy raised concerns about the snorkel affecting cooling efficiency, while @JimK noted the need for improvement in the engine bay aesthetics. Others, including @LongDucDong, pointed out that modifications from the early 2000s may detract from the vehicle's value. Additionally, @Mcest2025 noted potential issues with the tachometer and window operation, while various users flagged comments as non-constructive, indicating a mix of confusion and negativity in response to the auction process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @CarlsonClassics (The Seller) describes the Ducati 851 as having a certain rawness that is very attractive, highlighting its fantastic sound and ride quality. They mention that the bike is well taken care of and in amazing shape, being started regularly while kept in a living room. Commenters like @dances express excitement over the bike being a 'real bike,' while @Chris2wheels appreciates the virtually complete set of original bodywork that accompanies the sale, indicating the bike's historical significance.
Neutral: Comments regarding the Ducati 851 and its series suggest that these bikes are underappreciated, with @NCR600TT referring to the 851/888 series as some of the most underrated motorcycles ever built. @ronsant notes their importance in the resurgence of Ducati in the 90s, and @Zxreed shares personal experiences riding similar models, reflecting on their character compared to modern bikes. The community seems to recognize the historical and developmental significance of this era of Ducati motorcycles.
Negative: There were no prominently negative comments regarding the Ducati 851; however, @NCR600TT controversially mentions their confusion over the popularity of the Ducati 916, characterizing it as uncomfortable. They seemingly question why buyers would opt for a model like the MHe, labeling it 'unrideable,' indicating a concern for rideability in more modern offerings compared to the well-loved 851/888 series.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @TurnTableGuy expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, describing it as a lot of fun and reminiscent of cart racing. He mentioned his experience with similar models, noting that a supercharged S52 was particularly enjoyable for everyday use. @Rgran2105 (The Seller) also responded positively by highlighting how the car can still be driven on the street, adding that the original top can be included if the buyer desires, which reflects the vehicle's versatility.
Neutral: @Rgran2105 (The Seller) provided insights into the various modifications made to the car, such as the roll cage's fabrication by Stellar Fabrications and the reinforcement of certain structures like the differential mounting points. The seller also clarified the situation regarding the passenger side glass, confirming that while it was removed due to cracking, the mechanism remains functional. Furthermore, he mentioned the power increase from the supercharger setup, indicating that the vehicle would make approximately 320hp.
Negative: @shelleysolaris raised questions about the vehicle's current condition, including whether it is mainly suited for track use or remains street legal. Additionally, @elly18 highlighted concerns regarding the common issue of separating welds in the trunk area, emphasizing the need for solutions due to potential damage from spirited driving. Similarly, @camarolynn and @automilejack both requested additional photos and videos to better assess the car's modifications and structural integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is being presented as 100% ready to go, fully serviced, and in immaculate condition with no mechanical improvements needed, rated 10/10 mechanically by the seller, @Collectibleclassics. The seller describes the vehicle as a stunning, one-family owned example that has had only minor cosmetic repairs, specifically a small scratch on the front fender. The service history provided indicates thorough maintenance done at Euro Motorcars, including checks and changes of fluids, brakes, and various components, ensuring the vehicle drives like new after a 150-mile test drive. Nurtured by careful previous owners and supported by positive Google Reviews, the seller expresses confidence that a buyer will be acquiring a near-new version of this G-Wagon.
Neutral: Comments from potential buyers include requests for additional pictures and clarification on service history, with some expressing appreciation for the transparency and service done on the vehicle. @WookieCookies requests specific photos of door sills and the trunk door, while @letzgotowork inquires about the weather conditions in Maryland affecting vehicle maintenance. Additionally, @MakeCarsGreatAgain asks for confirmation on the functionality of features like Distronic Plus, indicating an interest in how such features perform in urban settings. The seller is responsive, providing updates and addressing questions promptly, reiterating the truck's good condition.
Negative: A couple of comments raised mild concerns, particularly regarding the visibility of minor damage and the functionality of video links provided by the seller. @Mifdesign mentioned issues with video access while seeking confirmation about the reported minor damage history, and @WookieCookies expressed apprehension about possible rust beneath the trunk liner, with the seller maintaining that the vehicle is rust-free and has been meticulously cared for. @WookieCookies also expressed doubts about discoloration on door sills but received reassurance from the seller about their condition. Overall, the comments reflect a cautious but generally positive inquiry into the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @willie2323 remarked on the beauty of the bike, expressing confidence that it would soon have a new owner. @Roth517 and @Gearhed64 also praised the bike, with Roth517 commenting on its impressive condition given its age and Gearhed64 noting it as a great find. @Driven4more highlighted the comfort and enjoyment of riding this model, while @dbandler described it as an all-time favorite, emphasizing its build quality from Honda. Furthermore, @getnosty (The Seller) showcased his commitment to transparency, providing insights about the bike's service history, maintenance, and including new videos for interested buyers.
Neutral: @Wheelyneat and @Kzxpilot both commented on specific blemishes on the bike, questioning their origins and suggesting that the seller provide clarification. @trailerjoe inquired about the inclusion of the passenger seat cowl, seeking confirmation about its condition and whether it would be included in the sale. @Nashsnazzy questioned whether the blemish may have been caused by brake fluid, while @dgl1325 and @eaglemike shared their personal experiences with the VFR models, contributing to the dialogue surrounding the bike's desirability. The seller responsibly addressed these concerns, asserting that the blemish was not a crack but a result of an overfilled clutch master cylinder during inspection.
Negative: While the overall sentiment is favorable, a few comments expressed concern regarding the blemish on the paint and the credibility of the bike's service history. @Kzxpilot noted a strange blemish, which raised questions about prior repairs or damage, while @Nashsnazzy and @Wheelyneat discussed whether it could be a result of carelessness. Despite these issues, the consensus remains largely positive, indicating the seller's transparency may counteract any potential concerns.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz expresses enthusiasm for the McLaren 720S, describing it as a 'dynamite' vehicle with a beautiful build in white, and offers well wishes for the sale. Overall, potential buyers seem to appreciate the car's attractive aesthetic and performance features, signaling a strong interest in this supercar. @theforce88 emphasizes the car's beauty and wishes the seller good luck, further supporting the positive sentiment around the vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @Carneed, has responded to comments regarding the 2020 McLaren 720S, highlighting its impressive specifications including a twin-turbocharged V8 engine and various luxury features. They address inquiries about the vehicle's history, such as the accumulator replacements and the presence of paint protection film (PPF), providing clear information to interested bidders. The seller also offers assistance with logistics, shipping, and registration, indicating a commitment to customer service.
Negative: Concerns have been raised by @Alfa4 and @Stevenc67 regarding the vehicle's condition, specifically questioning whether the accumulators have been changed. Additionally, @tst550 points out that the car is not labeled as a Performance Spider, which may cause uncertainty and affect bidder confidence. Overall, while some comments are positive, there are inquiries that indicate lingering doubts about aspects of the vehicle's maintenance and classification.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received admiration for its character and desirability, with enthusiasts praising the Alfa Montreal for its unique V8 engine and high-rpm performance. Commenters like @SlowNRusty and @Chops highlight the sheer joy of the car's sound and driving experience, reminiscing on the fun of revving the engine. Furthermore, @Drdjet notes the impressive condition of this Montreal, describing it as one of the best seen in years, while @formularacer emphasizes its ease of maintenance and suitability for Italian sports car collectors.
Neutral: Several commenters provided factual insights regarding the Montreal's auction history and market value. @Fleche_dOr shared comprehensive auction statistics, detailing previous sales and trends in the Montreal's market. This information sheds light on the vehicle's ongoing appeal to collectors, despite fluctuations in prices over the years. Additionally, @nicolettemarshall (The Seller) confirmed that the vehicle comes with a radio blanking plate, affirming details in the listing and inviting further inquiries from potential buyers.
Negative: There were some criticisms regarding the vehicle's descriptions and condition. @Tom_R raised questions about the radio blanking plate, noting concerns about whether the covering was just masking tape instead. @Knuckles-R-Busted humorously remarked on the unusual nature of referring to tape as a blanking plate. @BrakeHard5634 expressed disappointment about the absence of driving videos, suggesting that such content could enhance the selling potential. These points indicate some uncertainty among potential buyers about the car's presentation and condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @hokieajb (The Seller) mentioned that he will be posting drive videos soon, which could provide potential buyers with a better understanding of the vehicle's performance. He noted that the truck offers an enjoyable experience, especially with the soft top, suggesting it provides a fun, open-air driving adventure. Additionally, he highlighted the unique feature of the truck's design, such as having no quarter window in the back seat area, enhancing the open-air experience compared to later models.
Neutral: Several comments inquired about specific features and performance aspects of the vehicle. @ginger asked about potential wobbling issues during high-speed driving, showing concern over the truck's stability. Meanwhile, @Roni raised the question of whether this vehicle could be registered in California, indicating a regional concern about compliance with local regulations. @amediumformat and @chadsuv both expressed interest in visual content of the vehicle with its top off, indicating that such images could be instrumental in boosting the vehicle's appeal.
Negative: There were hints of concern regarding the vehicle's performance, particularly regarding potential steering wheel wobble at high speeds and the difficulty in passing smog checks typical for older cars. @Roni's mention of California registration issues reflects worries that could deter potential buyers interested in adhering to local environmental regulations. @hokieajb's answer regarding cold tires contributing to wobbling suggests that there may be underlying issues that could affect the driving experience, which did not provide reassurance to potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @RayBarton528 noted that the car is perfect and should attract a high price, while @THJimmy wished the seller good luck and complimented the car's impressive build, though he would have preferred red leather seats. @Landlords1 appreciated the car's beauty and rarity of the carbon fiber wheels, expressing a desire to buy it despite their personal preferences against the rear seat and sunroof. @elrod5 also praised the car, describing it as beautiful and fully loaded while wishing the seller well in the auction.
Neutral: @StanleyAG (The Seller) clarified that the decanter set was not included with the car as it was unavailable at the time of ordering and mentioned the vehicle has never been titled, meaning the new owner would be the first. He also addressed @Alwallis2000's query about the warranty, confirming that the warranty coverage had not started and that an open recall would be resolved prior to delivery. @DonaldDuck80 mentioned his own similar car, sharing that he hadn’t experienced any engine issues despite not being a drag racer, indicating a general reliability of such vehicles.
Negative: @Landlords1 expressed frustration over the inclusion of a rear seat and sunroof, stating these features would deter them from purchasing the car, showing their pickiness as a collector. The comments indicate a divide among collectors and enthusiasts, with some like @Landlords1 focused on specific features while others appreciated the car as a whole. Overall, there seems to be a consensus that while the car is desirable, its specific configurations may not appeal to every potential buyer.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GBRBiLL commented on the vehicle, expressing his approval, stating it was quick and describing it as a nice rig. @VintageRinasce (The Seller) provided a detailed overview of the vehicle, highlighting the extensive restoration it underwent in Southern Italy by specialists with over 20 years of Land Rover experience. He mentioned that the restoration was comprehensive, showcasing a rust-free example with over 500 photos documenting the process. The mechanical and cosmetic upgrades included a rebuilt 300Tdi engine and R380 5-speed manual transmission, along with modern comforts like mocha brown leather upholstery and a Bluetooth media system.
Neutral: @WAGONBOYTD made a note about the soft top conversion, indicating that while he appreciated the change, he suggested a more luxurious top to complement the mocha interior. He pointed out his personal preferences in terms of aesthetics without expressing any strong negative feedback about the current setup. @VintageRinasce (The Seller) also engaged with potential buyers by indicating that a video showcasing the vehicle would be available shortly, emphasizing the enjoyment of driving with the top down on sunny days.
Negative: While the majority of comments were positive or neutral, there were hints of critique, especially from @WAGONBOYTD who felt the soft top could be improved for a more luxurious look, indicative of some reservations about the overall presentation of the vehicle. However, there were no outright negative comments directed at the vehicle's performance or quality, which suggests that the vehicle generally met expectations of those discussing it.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @topduarte called it a beautiful 1st year TPI C4 Corvette with great handling, perfect for canyon carving in the 80s. @kinglaw expressed admiration for the car, noting its overall beauty and suggesting that any concerns about its mileage or quality are unwarranted. He shared his positive experience with the 4+3 manual transmission, emphasizing the model's qualities and highlighting the rarity of such well-maintained sports cars. @GravityFeed also praised the 4+3 system, defending its functionality and advocating for its enjoyment, while others like @rgilson7 shared similar experiences with their own 4+3 cars, celebrating their reliability. Overall, many comments indicated a strong affection for the C4 model and its performance capabilities.
Neutral: There were several comments related to the specifications and features of the car. @WimbletonMACH clarified some details about the window sticker indicating seat color and acknowledged the car's clean interior. @8tony and others discussed the appropriate types of fluids to use in the 4+3 transmission, providing practical advice based on past experiences. The conversations also touched on shipping logistics, with @Bri2203 explaining why original tires may not be included in the shipping calculator, allowing potential buyers alternatives for shipping quotes. This shared knowledge contributed to an informative discussion about the nuances of the Corvette community.
Negative: Some comments reflected dissatisfaction and concerns about the vehicle's transmission. @Transaman007 stated that the Doug Nash 4+3 manual transmission is a major deal-breaker for him, comparing it unfavorably with other manual transmissions. This sentiment was met with some pushback from @kinglaw, who defended the 4+3 system based on his personal experience. Additionally, inquiries about the car's features, like those from @8tony regarding the tires and potential upgrades, hinted at some uncertainty about the car’s condition and performance. Overall, despite the appreciation for the C4, there were voices expressing legitimate concerns about the transmission and potential modifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Garage42LLC (The Seller) expresses excitement about showcasing the 2021 Maserati Ghibli Trofeo and emphasizes its premium features, including secure storage and logistics assistance for the winning bidder. @AutoCan shares a positive experience with the vehicle, describing it as family-friendly and enjoyable to drive. @Wob contributes to the positive sentiment, reflecting on how fun the car is and expressing happiness to see it available again.
Neutral: @safulop offers a mixed view, mentioning past concerns about the interior quality of Ghiblis but recognizing that this Trofeo has a nice interior. @jmkmets raises a question about the red stripes in the grill, seeking clarity on whether it is a removable decoration or a permanent feature, indicating interest in the vehicle's details without providing a definite opinion.
Negative: @maxforza brings up concerns regarding the Ghibli's history of wheel alignments, questioning if the vehicle may be out of alignment. Although @Garage42LLC (The Seller) responds with information and attachments about alignment checks, @maxforza's follow-up requests for clearer documentation suggest lingering doubts about the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
Vortec-Powered, One-Family-Owned 1990 Toyota Land Cruiser FJ62
JT3FJ62G6L1118089
Lot 217048
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the vehicle's impressive reliability, particularly noting Toyota's build quality and the Vortec engine's capabilities. @SparksClassic mentions that the mileage reflects how well Toyota constructs their vehicles, while @SoExSo and @Dontbeasnob discuss the benefits of the Vortec engine, claiming it enhances performance and longevity. @Mike-munkres2025 (The Seller) reiterates the vehicle's strong performance, stating it can run at highway speeds comfortably, and emphasizes that all systems, including the air conditioning, are operational. Additionally, several users appreciate the family history of the vehicle, suggesting it has been well taken care of over the years.
Neutral: Comments provide a range of inquiries regarding the vehicle's features and performance, such as the fitment of the front bumper, mileage, and engine specifications. @DavidLeeRaleighNC and @SurfPunk pose specific questions about the light bar's placement and gas mileage comparisons, alongside confirmations of mechanical features like oil pressure gauges and window operations. The seller responds with clarifications regarding maintenance tasks, functionality of parts, and offers insights into the engine's background, which helps potential buyers gain a better understanding of the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding aesthetic issues and modifications of the vehicle. @Rich24 questions a paint blemish, and @SurfPunk mentions signs of rust, indicating the need for maintenance attention. Some users are critical of the front bumper fitment, and there are comments about the choice of engine swap, with @SoExSo expressing disappointment over the absence of a diesel option, while others feel the swap could affect the vehicle’s character. Moreover, there are queries about the complexity of maintenance for the new engine, showcasing a divide in confidence over the vehicle's current modifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @SundayMoney22 praises the vehicle with enthusiastic comments about the photos, expressing appreciation for their quality. @jmg421 also shows a positive interest in the Bronco, highlighting its great appearance while engaging with the seller regarding further inquiries.
Neutral: @atisaacs90 (The Seller) adequately addresses the inquiries raised by potential buyers, providing information about the vehicle's recall and the nature of scratches. They confirm that the issue with seat belts has been resolved and clarify the situation regarding the vehicle's modifications for larger tires.
Negative: Concerns are raised about an open safety recall related to low pressure fuel pump failure, shared by @SundayMoney22 after checking the CARFAX. The description warns about potential risks associated with engine stalling, heightening apprehensions for potential bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @JAY-Z praised the Accord for its fantastic condition, highlighting it as one of Honda's best models he owned for 15 years before selling. @Myoldcut emphasized the 1988-98 era as the pinnacle of Honda performance, noting the car is well-built, dependable, and a true time capsule. @Kenny360 admired the vehicle's longevity and suggested that with a few upgrades, it could easily run for decades, showcasing the durability of Honda cars over the years.
Neutral: The Seller, @vfnrcc, provided background on the vehicle and emphasized their commitment to transparency and quality; they ensured the car undergoes thorough testing before listing and expressed confidence in its condition by offering it with no reserve. @masterqi inquired about the documentation and service records, while @fitisgo speculated on the cause of the marks in the seats, suggesting possible past use of marijuana. @MSgt-Ret mentioned the car's suitability for their granddaughter and discussed potential modifications post-purchase.
Negative: @flyntofdallas raised concerns about possible cigarette burns and stains on the car's interior, noting its appearance might suggest it was a smoker's car. The Seller, @vfnrcc, acknowledged the smoking history but assured that the vehicle was professionally cleaned, while @malimd questioned the legality of the tires due to their age, indicating potential issues with safe driving, and @wannabid55 noted a persistent seat belt light observed during driving videos, expressing concern about its underlying issue.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous commenters express positive sentiments about the Bronco, highlighting its stunning aesthetics and high-performance features. @Tburgett calls it a beautiful Bronco, while @MontanaBroncos praises the appealing color combination and the interior. @Johnnyaction remarks that he likes everything about the vehicle, indicating a strong appreciation among potential buyers. Additionally, @ACA101 admires the unique paint and interior combination, further supporting the notion that the Bronco is a standout in the vintage vehicle community.
Neutral: Some comments take a neutral stance, focusing on inquiries regarding the vehicle's details and performance. @Stallion101 questions whether the Bronco can pass Arizona emissions, while @Gistus1972 asks about what is needed for the air conditioning to function correctly. @gkhayden (The Seller) provides clarity by confirming the vehicle's emissions history and that the AC works but may need a recharge. These inquiries suggest interest in the Bronco's usability and compliance rather than outright opinions on its appearance or performance.
Negative: On the downside, some aspects raise concerns among commenters. @Machineman80 reflects on the possibility of emissions issues, indicating hesitance about the vehicle's compliance. Although @gkhayden states that the Bronco did pass emissions when purchased, uncertainty remains due to the modifications made. Furthermore, the AC comment hints at a potential drawback with its current performance, as it is not producing "ice cold" air. These points create a slight cloud over the otherwise positive reception of the Bronco.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @nexusautobrokers praised the car as beautiful and mentioned the seller is amazing, wishing them luck with the sale. @Oldhockyplayr commented on the 1991 NSX representing the pinnacle of Japanese sports car engineering, recalling their own positive experience with a similar model. @PanteraMike74 described the vehicle as a truly collector quality example, noting it should set a benchmark for Gen 1 NSXs in the current market. Many commenters, including @Evolover and @AutoFanaticNY, expressed admiration for the NSX as a legendary vehicle to own and drive, highlighting its appeal and potential market value.
Neutral: Comments from @Car_Concierge (The Seller) provided detailed information about the vehicle's condition, mentioning recent maintenance work and encouraging potential buyers to view it in person. The seller highlighted the car's available features and addressed potential inquiries about the auction process. Other commenters, like @doctor1 and @Evolover, noted the car's low mileage and discussed the condition of various components, while @chriszales requested clarification on the service history and existing conditions, indicating a potential interest in the vehicle and a desire for transparency.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @carbuffvt, who pointed out rust issues under the vehicle that were apparent compared to another NSX they owned. @chriszales inquired deeper into the condition, mentioning paint chips and corrosion, reflecting skepticism about the car's structural integrity. @MihirT raised questions regarding conflicting reports about the car's ownership timeline, hinting at possible inconsistencies in the listing. These comments suggest a cautious approach among some interested parties regarding the car's condition and history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @K_Torres (The Seller) expressed a deep passion and pride in the Evo IV, describing it as a lifelong dream. The seller highlighted the extensive time, effort, and resources dedicated to the vehicle's enhancement, showcasing the care and attention to detail that has gone into its build. Fans in the community, like @t4nuki and @Fishboi, also appreciated the car, commenting positively about its aesthetics and build quality, with @bayanmog praising the overall modification.
Neutral: The conversation touched on practical matters regarding the importation of the vehicle into the U.S. @K_Torres (The Seller) clarified that the car is eligible for import due to its age, addressing @Redbird41's comment about California’s stricter regulations on vehicle imports. While both @Redbird41 and @ToyotaAristocrat engaged in a debate about the specific requirements for importing vehicles into California, @DonRolandoFurioso provided insight from a personal experience, acknowledging the complexities but affirming that it is possible to import a vehicle of this age, albeit with additional costs for compliance.
Negative: Some comments noted confusion and disagreement over the import regulations, causing a bit of conflict within the thread. @Redbird41 insisted on a more stringent approach for California, arguing against @ToyotaAristocrat's claims regarding importing vehicles, which created some tension between the two. Their exchange seemed to overshadow the more positive aspects of the vehicle, as the focus shifted from appreciation of the Evo IV to the bureaucratic hurdles involved in its U.S. import.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @halcyonmotors admires the beauty and unique visual appeal of this lovely bike, noting the courage of @globebiker for offering it up in a no-reserve auction. @jbruns64 highlights the good condition of the Ariel shown in the pictures and video, providing helpful insights for potential bidders about the import process. @bringatrailer appreciates @C.Flint's correction regarding the bike's description and commends the quality of the example being sold.
Neutral: Multiple comments from users including @walterj1966 and @S-S reflect confusion regarding the bike's location, as the description states it is back in the UK while the listing mentions Rome, Italy. @globebiker clarifies that the bike is currently in storage in the UK, alleviating some of the ambiguity. Commenters share concerns about the complexities of international shipping, payment logistics, and the seller's transparency in providing necessary documentation for bidding.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding potential risks associated with buying the bike, as expressed by @Kasindy and @S-S. They highlight the uncertainties of remote purchasing, especially without being able to inspect the bike physically. @cactuspete points out discrepancies in the engine rebuild photos that raise doubts about the quality of the work done, while @DB6i and others question the seller's lack of knowledge regarding the location of the bike and the shipper, leading to skepticism about the auction's legitimacy.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its low mileage and excellent condition. @Dollycat3 noted it was a 'low mileage beauty' while @Boatymcboatface referred to it as a 'perfect little Mercedes.' @SlowNRusty mentioned that the W202 C-Class cars are well-designed, remarking on their rarity and praising the color and mileage. Various other commenters, including @MrAuto007 and @PetterW, echoed similar sentiments regarding the car's quality, design, and features, such as the HVAC controls and overall aesthetics.
Neutral: The seller, @mondo1, provided detailed information about the vehicle's service history, indicating several maintenance work performed on the car like oil changes, part replacements, and other service updates using OEM parts. @nikil inquired about the originality of the factory radio, while @magujia asked specific questions about the tire dates and potential harness issues. The seller addressed these inquiries, sharing insights about the car's history and condition without committing to any particular issues or positive traits that would heavily skew the comments in one direction.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about certain aspects of the vehicle. @magujia questioned if the car might have the common harness issue known to affect some models, suggesting potential reliability concerns. @FJBERT requested additional information regarding the wiring harness to assess whether it had been replaced, indicating that there could still be unresolved issues given the model's age. Overall, while the positive feedback about the car's appearance and features prevailed, there were underlying queries and apprehensions regarding its technical history and durability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlighted the vehicle's historical significance and the quality of its restoration, particularly noting it as a beautiful survivor with one owner. @jgdunton praised it for being a beautiful survivor, while @Biscotte57 described it as an incredible, rare example with substantial money invested. Commentors like @M5Z3M shared nostalgic memories of similar vehicles, emphasizing the car's trustworthy craftsmanship and unique driving experience, particularly the hydraulic suspension system. The seller, @GenauAutoWerks, also provided detailed information about the extensive mechanical work done, which garnered further appreciation for the car's readiness for a new owner.
Neutral: The state of the vehicle drew mixed reactions, with several commenters acknowledging both its charm and areas needing attention. @berfinroy noted the presence of neglected cosmetic and undercarriage issues, while @LLynn expressed concerns that the rust seemed more than superficial, albeit speaking to the amount of work invested in the car. The seller's transparency in showcasing the car's underbody and rust condition through photographs was commended by @M5Z3M, suggesting that while there are imperfections, they could be manageable.
Negative: On the negative side, some commenters expressed significant concern regarding the rust issues. @solidol suggested that despite a love for the vehicle, potential buyers should not overlook the rust, indicating it could pose problems if not properly addressed. @kling.klang also commented on the necessity of stabilizing the minimal surface rust underneath, reflecting a cautious approach to potential buyers. Overall, there is a recognition that while the car has an appealing history and mechanical reliability, its visible faults may deter some prospects.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 2017 Cadillac Escalade Premium Luxury, being presented at auction, is described as absolutely stunning with ultra-low mileage and excellent condition throughout. The seller, @VantageAuto, emphasizes the vehicle's one-owner history from Texas, highlighting the lack of rust and the powerful 6.2 liter V8 engine that runs beautifully. The interior is also noted to show practically no signs of wear, and the car is loaded with numerous options including upgraded wheels and a comprehensive multimedia system. Promising a quality product, @VantageAuto encourages prospective buyers to tag them with questions, expressing eagerness for a successful auction.
Neutral: Several individuals have raised questions about specific features and details regarding the Escalade. @johnny0620 inquired about video footage of the instrument panel during startup and while driving. @Jcraigz asked about the date codes on the tires and whether any warning lights were present on the dashboard, to which @VantageAuto confirmed the absence of warning lights. Others like @Davesherri were interested in the air conditioning system and its functionality, while @Keyz1 pointed out a potential discoloration in a photo, which @VantageAuto addressed as being easily removable.
Negative: Concerns related to the vehicle's condition have been expressed, particularly regarding perceived issues with the exhaust system. @Rickytanks suggested that there might be a hole in the muffler, while @pilotxp noticed flickering lights on the console during a test drive, leading to questions about potential electrical problems. @Pboffy commented on the lack of cleanliness in engine and undercarriage photos, suggesting that the seller could improve presentation efforts. Furthermore, @alvocado mentioned concerns related to the camshaft replacement noted in the Carfax, suggesting that additional information about the repair would be beneficial for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and classic appeal. @Hackberry praised the seller for maintaining the old Benz in excellent condition, while @Dollycat3 echoed this sentiment, stating they love everything about the beautiful 220. @Vic (The Seller) thanked everyone for their comments and confirmed the vehicle's beauty with a nice color combination. The car is recognized as a well-maintained piece, and @69_911e noted its old-school features, which resonate well with enthusiasts. Overall, the vehicle has garnered positive feedback, reflecting its status as a cherished classic car.
Neutral: Several comments included inquiries regarding the vehicle's features and service history. @jimmer1950 questioned the lack of air conditioning, to which @Vic (The Seller) promptly replied, clarifying that the car is not equipped with it. Commenters like @FJBERT and @ShrimpDawg also asked about maintenance records and the engine's compatibility with unleaded gas. @ThorstenfromGermany provided insight into the car's past AC installation, indicating the possibility of restoring this feature. These neutral responses highlight potential buyers' curiosity about the car's specifications and history without expressing strong opinions.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism and concerns about the vehicle's maintenance and pricing. @wdbcoupe raised a question about the seller's $100 document fee, suggesting it seemed excessive and implying that previous listings may have been overpriced. Additionally, @Luketmarx pointed out a potential issue with the engine, mentioning it sounded like it had a miss at idle and inquired about fuel type. These negative remarks suggest that some commenters may doubt the seller's transparency or the car's performance despite its classic appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is described as a beautiful, well-kept RS4 in near mint condition, having been maintained only by Audi dealers since the seller acquired it in 2019. The interior is pristine, and the exterior is in excellent condition, with only minor paint chips expected on the front bumper. The seller has invested in a high-quality ceramic coating with a lifetime warranty and completed notable maintenance tasks, including refreshing the tires and brakes, ensuring that the car is ready for new ownership without needing immediate repairs. Several commentators have praised the car's condition and the seller's honesty and trustworthiness, with one mentioning it as a great example that looks and sounds amazing.
Neutral: The seller notes that there are two known issues with the car: the headlight wiring harness made from soy is starting to wear, which may eventually cause headlights to blow out, and there is a need for rear lower control arms replacement for a proper alignment. The car has a current draw likely linked to aftermarket accessories, and some codes related to the alarm system have been noted, although these issues do not currently affect the daily drivability of the vehicle. Furthermore, the seller has documented all service records, with potential minor adjustments recommended by previous viewers to enhance overall conditions, such as adjusting the front bumper cover.
Negative: While the seller has provided a mostly positive overview, some concerns were raised by commenters regarding the vehicle's condition, such as possible surface rust on the rotors and the lack of information about carbon cleaning or injector maintenance in the car's history. The cost for necessary repairs, such as the wiring harness replacement at $4,000, has also raised eyebrows. Additionally, the reliability of the alarm system is questioned due to the current draw, which could lead to battery issues. These factors may deter potential buyers who are concerned about the expense and time associated with these repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, with @Scott68GTO declaring it 'Absolutely beautiful' and @Dollycat3 describing it as a 'beautiful Fleetwood 60 Special Brougham' with a stunning color combination and low mileage. Others, like @roger.noble, praised the car's excellent condition and emphasized the comfort it offers on the road. Many comments highlighted the car’s status as a 'time capsule,' indicating that its originality and well-preserved features contribute to its desirability. @Driven4more reminisced about personal memories associated with Cadillacs, adding a nostalgic touch to the appreciation of this vehicle.
Neutral: Commenters sought clarifications about various car features, such as the age of the Michelin tires mentioned by @Longmire45 and the authenticity of the upholstery discussed by @carfan1978, who wondered if the seating surfaces are original or have been recovered. The seller, @LFFInc, addressed these inquiries by confirming that the interior is indeed original Minuet Cloth. Some users, like @Drujon, engaged in discussions about the specific fabric and color options introduced during the vehicle's production era, further emphasizing the car's historical significance.
Negative: There were a few critical comments regarding certain aspects of the vehicle, with @ParcelGuy questioning the accuracy of the reported mileage and suggesting inconsistency based on the car's condition. @Hoppy18 expressed skepticism about the deliverability of the car's condition with its claimed mileage. Additionally, @scd199899bv inquired about potential damage to the steering wheel, indicating concern over the vehicle's upkeep. Overall, while the majority of feedback was positive, these comments reflected a level of scrutiny regarding the condition and credibility of the vehicle's history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @SullivanAutoHouse (The Seller) expressed excitement about auctioning a beautiful Green, Big Window, Short Bed C10, highlighting its impressive appearance and sound. @JLsKA510 praised the truck enthusiastically, simply stating that they love it. @Highlander63 also showed appreciation for the vehicle, complimenting both its color and the backdrop of the pictures, referring to it as a strong and desirable machine.
Neutral: @Iowa85 asked about the functionality of the heater, blower, and A/C system in the truck. In response, @SullivanAutoHouse provided clarification regarding the heating system, mentioning that while the fan, switches, ducting, and housing are intact, the heater core has been removed by the previous owner. @SullivanAutoHouse also promised that more videos, including a cold start and driving footage, would be shared.
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boat3 praised the vehicle, stating it is 'basically bullet-proof' with no warranty repairs needed after hitting 60,000 miles. They highlighted the excellent ride quality thanks to air suspension and described it as quiet for a large vehicle. They believe it offers more value compared to competitors like Jeep, Bronco, or even a G-wagen.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Mbalcos and @jspinzig, engaged in discussions about the vehicle's details. @Mbalcos requested additional photos of the vehicle, specifically the rear view, and @andrewtpack (The Seller) promptly confirmed that he submitted new photos to be uploaded. @CTDan inquired about the vehicle's storage until mid-November, to which @andrewtpack (The Seller) agreed.
Negative: No significant negative comments were present in the discussion. Although there were inquiries about the warranty and history of the vehicle, there were no complaints or negative feedback from commenters regarding the vehicle's condition or performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @artkara1 (The Seller) mentions that the car runs perfectly without any leaks, smoke, or odd noises, indicating it has been well-maintained. The seller also assures that the windows work perfectly, suggesting reliability in the vehicle's features. Additionally, @artkara1 highlights the enjoyment of driving the Jaguar, especially with the top down, and promises to provide more media, such as driving videos, to showcase the car further.
Neutral: @chew inquires about the servicing of the hydraulics on the convertible top, reflecting a general concern for the vehicle's convertible mechanism, while @Oldisgoodtoo asks for documentation regarding any past suspension work, hinting at interest in the car’s maintenance history. @BrokenCupholder raises points based on observations of the vehicle's condition, speculating about previous maintenance based on front height and the presence of missing bolt covers, indicating a desire for thoroughness in understanding the car's background without being overtly negative.
Negative: @Oldisgoodtoo expresses concern regarding a potential issue mentioned in the mechanic's notes about a wet range sensor, questioning whether this indicates an oil leak, which could affect the vehicle's performance. @BrokenCupholder implies possible past repairs due to the visible signs in the vehicle's structure, suggesting that there could be underlying issues that need addressing, while @Tedfromohio notes a specific observation about the windows not appearing to be down in the pictures, indicating potential oversight in showcasing the car's features.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ExpatDriver mentioned curiosity about the vehicle's auction history, while @jopin (The Seller) opened up about having purchased it from a previous auction with intentions to sell it and eventually buy an SL55 P30, highlighting a positive experience with ownership. @timberframe expressed a shared thrill of driving similar models, while @gscharnagl praised the intriguing form factor of the vehicle, specifically referencing the AMG motor and the attractive 'mars red' color as favorites. Such comments reflect a general enthusiasm for the vehicle and its driving experience.
Neutral: The discussions also included technical inquiries and clarifications about the vehicle's various features. @shelikes2race asked about the functionality of the top mechanism and any hydraulic components, to which @jopin (The Seller) responded that the top works perfectly and that the A/C and heat are in good condition. A series of questions by @bajagp highlighted concerns about potential oil leaks, an issue touched upon by several other commenters, and included requests for video demonstrations of the car's features. These inquiries demonstrate a reasonable level of interest in understanding the car's condition thoroughly.
Negative: However, concerns regarding the vehicle's condition were also prominent in the discussions. @bajagp questioned the integrity of the front bumper cover, pointing out possible damage that was not confirmed by @jopin (The Seller), who noted a repair had occurred after a minor accident. @arerrac expressed worry about an oil leak after service work, although @jopin (The Seller) indicated that the issue was resolved with the replacement of the valve cover gaskets. Overall, these negative comments illustrate caution from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's past issues and current state.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @alexg182 praised the seller for going above and beyond in ensuring a quality buying experience. @Dollycat3 called the Winnebago beautiful, while @1996MBZ highlighted its suitability for adventurous individuals by expressing admiration for its wilderness capability. @bsinnott911 shared their extensive travel experience in a similar van, stating that these vehicles are amazing and suggested additional enhancements, enhancing the positive atmosphere around the vehicle.
Neutral: @AuthenticAuctions (The Seller) provided detailed information about the vehicle, including upgrades and service confirmations to inquiries from @benster and @Snowdrew00. They assured that the recommended services had been completed and addressed concerns about the vehicle’s title and potential issues with the rear differential. The seller also provided specifications about the van's features such as tank capacities, power systems, and the availability of service records, maintaining an informative and open line of communication with potential buyers.
Negative: @muddymogriffin raised a concern about the title status, questioning the legitimacy of a "Clean Colorado title" with Montana plates. @Snowdrew00 expressed skepticism regarding the state of the rear differential, implying possible hidden issues. @benster's inquiries indicated concerns about warranty coverage and the implications of aftermarket modifications on ride quality and emissions compliance in California, reflecting a cautious view on the vehicle's readiness for stringent regulatory environments.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received lots of factory maintenance and features numerous recent upgrades. According to @Euro_Classica (The Seller), both batteries have been replaced, and it has new air suspension, along with a recent gloss black powder coat for the OEM wheels. The top functions perfectly and has been calibrated, complemented by stage 3 paint correction and ceramic coating, ensuring both aesthetic and mechanical quality. @Euro_Classica reassures potential buyers that there are no check engine lights and that the car drives exceptionally well, emphasizing that this is an opportunity to own a luxury vehicle for less than its actual value.
Neutral: Several commentators, such as @Drdodger and @Dustinspiveyfsu, expressed curiosity regarding the vehicle's condition and history, specifically asking about the top's state and the original wheels. @Ryebird requested videos showing the top's operation and the functionality of the power trunk lid, which @Euro_Classica provided, confirming all elements are working properly. Other inquiries focused on minor details like the possible degradation of rubber seals and residual polish noted in the door jams, with @Euro_Classica clarifying that these were superficial issues and not indicative of larger problems.
Negative: On the negative side, commentators expressed concerns about the vehicle's history, including whether it had been serviced by a Bentley dealership since being repossessed. @Dustinspiveyfsu raised questions about potential wear on the seals and the condition of the top, prompting discussions about maintenance costs for restorations. @Drdodger also queried about the original wheels and indicated a need for clarification on the vehicle's overall condition, suggesting some uncertainty among potential buyers about the car's reliability despite its seemingly well-tended maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @juacan described the car as an "awesome looking car" with essential features, saying that it looks like a dealer-to-dealer GT. They noted that the stock model is pretty quiet, suggesting consideration of modifications like going 85 and a tune. @NVGT350 echoed this excitement, expressing that the car is "stunning" in red and complimented its overall design. @WZYWAL (The Seller) emphasized the beauty and features of the vehicle, noting a professional wrap in paint protection film and the powerful performance specs, including a 5.2-liter supercharged V8 that delivers over 700 horsepower, as well as impressive 0-60 and quarter-mile times.
Neutral: @WZYWAL (The Seller) provided detailed information about the vehicle, including its specifications, mileage, and included performance features such as the B&O sound system, heated/cooled seats, and advanced technology. They also mentioned the clean history of the car with no accidents and confirmed recent maintenance. In response to @Pete500600's query about an owner’s kit car cover, @WZYWAL verified that it was not available, maintaining transparency regarding the vehicle's accessories. Additionally, they responded to @rlhug1954's inquiry about the original build sheet by clarifying that it wasn't available but provided an option list instead.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive comments, one challenge arises from the absence of the original build sheet, which @rlhug1954 inquired about. The lack of the factory car cover raised some disappointment from @Pete500600, although @WZYWAL (The Seller) assured them they would check for it. There are no serious negative comments about the vehicle itself, but the need for clarification on these accessory items indicates that some potential buyers may have concerns about completeness.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @swissard finds the removable hardtop of the vehicle to be very appealing, describing it as "pretty cool." @Pivo shares positive insight regarding the tires, stating that, although the current tires are worn out, it presents an opportunity for the new owner to select their preferred options. Furthermore, @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) emphasizes the vehicle's unique features, including its low mileage and extensive service records, contributing to the car's overall value.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) presents their dealership and services, highlighting their commitment to providing a smooth transaction process and offering various logistical assistance. They reassure potential buyers about the condition of the vehicle, specifically mentioning that the shifter boot can be refurbished and the tires can be replaced at a dealer's wholesale cost. @TKPHX provides additional information about the unique design elements of the early Boxster hardtops, adding more context to the vehicle's specifications.
Negative: @RonMan2 notes that the shifter boot has seen better days, indicating wear that may require attention. @Djtanta raises concerns about potential leaks and questions the age of the tires, expressing skepticism about their condition. @Shawh expresses disappointment that the car may not receive the attention it deserves, implying the value might not reflect its quality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Jhray04 commented positively on the vehicle, calling it a great looking car and suggesting that it is worth much more than the current bid of 4.4k. This indicates that there is a general appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic and potentially its value in the market.
Neutral: @LWCollins (The Seller) responded to both @vcee12ameritech and @Jhray04, clarifying that the issue raised by @vcee12ameritech regarding the trim piece is a minor repair made by a previous owner, indicating that it isn't necessary to remove for service. The seller also expressed hope regarding the bidding process, acknowledging the limited time before the auction ends.
Negative: @vcee12ameritech raised a concern about the condition of a specific part of the vehicle, questioning whether it was glued or caulked and if it was removable. @Camerons inquired about the lien on the car, suggesting that there may be underlying financial concerns associated with the purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @AIQExotic provided clear information about the vehicle's maintenance history, indicating transparency regarding the timing chain. This openness can foster trust with potential buyers, as it allows them to make informed decisions based on the vehicle's upkeep.
Neutral: @Jonfrancis raised a relevant query about the timing chain, showing an active interest in the vehicle's maintenance status. The question reflects a common concern among buyers who want to ensure the vehicle is in good working order before making a purchase.
Negative: @AIQExotic's response that the timing chain has not been done and not proposed by BMW may raise concerns for potential buyers regarding the vehicle’s reliability and long-term maintenance costs, as timing chain issues can lead to significant repairs if not addressed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the aesthetics of the vehicle, particularly highlighting the vintage 1936/1937 steering wheel as a cool feature. @PSFarm specifically mentions that they wouldn't mind the non-originality of the steering wheel, indicating a positive reception to its style despite its lack of authenticity.
Neutral: @leswillman (The Seller) clarifies the origin of the tail lights and steering wheel, sharing that they are from a later model, specifically the 1936/1937 Chrysler Airflow. They also provide a link to a video that shows the car's previous condition, explaining that cosmetic updates were minimal since their ownership, focusing instead on safety and reliability improvements.
Negative: Several comments raise concerns about the authenticity of the car, particularly regarding the tail lights, which @ttbrinson claims are incorrect for the 1935 model. @pjarhead questions the absence of recent driving history, asking why there isn't a current video available, suggesting potential doubts about the car's condition and usability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The seller, @kruspeplayer, confirmed that the vehicle has a sport diff and mentioned they will upload the original window sticker soon. They also provided reassurance regarding the car's maintenance, noting that all fluids have been changed recently and that oil changes were conducted every 5000 miles. Additionally, the seller has a smog certificate, which is crucial for buyers in California, indicating that the vehicle complies with emissions regulations.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions about the vehicle's specifications and maintenance history. @COVT2014 inquired about the window sticker and the rear sport diff option, while @Theepervette asked about the PCV valve and the frequency of oil changes. @ronNC55 added that, according to APR, the car should have 444hp with a stage 1 tune, but @AudiCowboy pointed out that the vehicle has a dual pulley modification that elevates it to an APR Stage 2 level tune, suggesting even higher horsepower.
Negative: Some concerns were voiced regarding the vehicle's condition and maintenance details. @rfarro questioned whether the car still had the stock clutch, and @Theepervette expressed concerns about whether the PCV and trans fluid had been replaced, mentioning that the PCV valve is known to fail on the B8 chassis. Additionally, @qhead55 raised doubts about the car passing smog tests with its Stage 2 modifications, questioning its compliance with CARB regulations.
![]() |
Fuel-Injected, 390-Powered 1966 Ford Galaxie 500XL 2-Door Fastback
6E68X233619
Lot 216947
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @crowt expressed admiration for the vehicle's restoration, commending its beauty and performance capabilities, particularly highlighting the efficiency of the 352 engine. @Gumby1 also commented positively on the overall quality of the car, complimenting the seller on the restoration and sharing a personal connection to the area. @CSmith417 noted the addition of A/C, appreciating the seller for showcasing such a visually appealing car.
Neutral: @ybjornson93 (The Seller) clarified details about the car's engine and restoration process, explaining the modifications made to transition the engine from a 352 to a 390. He provided background about the car's purchase and the extensive work done to restore it, emphasizing that it has been garage-kept and is rarely driven. Additional questions from other commentators, such as @Gramatan regarding speaker installations, and @corvettom9 seeking more information about rust repairs, illustrate ongoing curiosity about the vehicle's condition and specifications.
Negative: @midwestfordman raised concerns about the absence of power brakes and questioned how much modification was necessary for the dashboard, hinting at potential issues with fitment. @corvettom9 expressed concern about the car's rust history and sought clarification on how completely it had been addressed, which could indicate potential lingering issues. Meanwhile, @crowt brought up a technical potential fault regarding the distributor's alignment on a newly rebuilt engine, suggesting that there might be some mechanical oversight.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @wfoguy (The Seller) mentions that the car drives excellent and exceeded EPA fuel mileage estimates, which reflects its reliability and efficiency. He also enjoys the sound system, highlighting his use of an FM transmitter with a flash drive for personalized music selection. Additionally, @wfoguy has installed a hardtop, which enhances the vehicle's versatility and appearance, assuring potential buyers that they can expect a well-maintained car.
Neutral: Commenters like @Nictmlnsn express interest in the car's condition, particularly the bumper scratches, while complimenting its beauty. @Jeepers84 and @Zoomer73 ask about any fluid leaks or odd odors, indicating concerns about the car's overall condition. @wfoguy addresses these questions by confirming there are no leaks or odors, and reassures that the car appears to have been a non-smoker's vehicle, which is a positive aspect for potential buyers.
Negative: @wfoguy (The Seller) reveals that his decision to sell the vehicle stems from discomfort during long drives, particularly due to the leather seats and seating position. He notes that despite his high expectations for the car, he did not develop a love for it, feeling that the positives did not outweigh his discomfort, especially with his joint problems. This highlights a personal struggle that might concern potential buyers about long-distance comfort.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the GTO as a "burgundy beauty," complimenting its build quality. @Moparmanbet echoed the sentiment, calling it a "great looking GOAT." @Burgandy1969GTO (The Seller) confirmed pride in ownership and shared that the car has a solid body rated a 10 out of 10, stating it has been meticulously cared for and garage-kept, contributing to its pristine condition. @goinfishin expressed an interest in a driving video, to which @Burgandy1969GTO (The Seller) agreed to provide, showcasing the vehicle's appeal further.
Neutral: @Burgandy1969GTO (The Seller) clarified the inclusion of an extra set of heads, providing information about the car's history and parts, while also addressing questions regarding the vehicle's paint condition and original sheet metal. Different commenters like @tonyGTO and @lust4speed raised inquiries about the engine's specifications, which @Burgandy1969GTO (The Seller) acknowledged and stated they would upload images of necessary documentation such as the PHS sheets to clarify any confusion. Questions about various components, including the transmission and exhaust modifications, prompted @Burgandy1969GTO (The Seller) to confirm details while assuring bidders about the car's overall health and performance.
Negative: @imbadboy asked about the condition of the dash, to which @Burgandy1969GTO (The Seller) responded affirmatively about its original state but acknowledged its aging paint had small chips. @robo749 and @DonVito raised concerns over the exhaust location change and missing steering column cover, respectively, prompting further explanation from @Burgandy1969GTO (The Seller) about previous ownership oversights. Commenters also speculated about the vehicle's original parts and whether modifications like the engine and transmission were true to the car, with @DonVito emphasizing concerns over non-matching components.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is highly praised by @VantageAuto, who describes it as an incredibly clean one-owner 2010 Q5 3.2 Quattro from California, highlighting its low mileage and excellent condition. It features a powerful and reliable 3.2-liter naturally aspirated V6 engine, which is noted as one of the best that Audi offered during a limited timeframe. The seller encourages potential buyers to view the detailed photo gallery, confirming that the car drives as well as it appears. Its body and interior are reported to be in great shape, free from any unpleasant odors, making it a fantastic daily driver for anyone in the market.
Neutral: Several inquiries about the vehicle's condition have been made, with @DBFCars asking about any leaks and the lifespan of the tires. @VantageAuto reassures that despite the age, the tires from 2016 have ample tread remaining, and everything works properly with no noted leaks. There are additional questions raised by @stevet47 regarding possible fluid leaks and the condition of the CV boot in the images. In response, @VantageAuto clarifies that the fluid observed in one image is residual from engine cleaning and not a significant leak, indicating their commitment to transparency about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @PinAl about potential leaks in the axle boot areas, as well as by @stevet47 regarding a large fluid leak visible in one of the images. @VantageAuto responded that there are no significant fluid leaks found and that the observations in the pictures are being investigated. However, there seems to be a demand for further clarification and images of specific areas to address the worries of potential buyers, indicating some remaining uncertainty about the vehicle's mechanical condition that may hinder buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @notforhire expressed nostalgia for the vehicle, mentioning its perfect aesthetic that inspires visions of enjoying winter sports. @Tigers196884 and @MrFordFan90 both expressed a strong affection for this generation of Pathfinder, highlighting its appeal and their desire for similar models. @Lilbopeep fondly recalled having a high-mileage 1988 Pathfinder SE, emphasizing the fun and personal connection they had with it, and showed interest in acquiring another if circumstances allowed. @CobraMD described the Pathfinder as one of the best early SUVs based on years of experience, praising its reliability over competitors and recommending it strongly in the past.
Neutral: Several comments focused on potential modifications and technical aspects of the vehicle. @JHHolliday asked the seller if they could source a rear tire carrier for potential buyers, indicating a desire for customization. @911r (The Seller) responded, acknowledging the challenge of finding vintage accessories due to the vehicle's age. @Steve928 inquired about specific details regarding the bolts on the seat backs and requested images of the repainting process. @Kirkside1 reminisced about their own experience with a similar truck from years ago, though they could not recall the purpose of the bolts.
Negative: While the overall tone was positive, there were hints of concern regarding the sourcing of vintage parts. @JHHolliday's inquiry about a rear tire carrier suggests potential doubts about availability, and @Steve928's question indicates a curiosity about the vehicle's condition due to the modifications or repairs implied by the bolts. Additionally, while @CobraMD praised the Pathfinder, their mention of commonly expected issues like distributor bearing failure implies that prospective buyers should remain cautious.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The seller, @Wilson4403, received several positive remarks about the car, particularly its modifications and overall condition. @PSTT complimented the thoughtful aftermarket modifications, including the wheels and body parts, describing them as looking good and noting that they contribute to a nice package. @salvy1103 also praised the quattro sport front bumper, suggesting that it enhances the car's aesthetic appeal. Additionally, @MakersMark expressed admiration for how well the vehicle was presented and maintained, implying that the vehicle is likely well-cared-for due to the seller's organized appearance.
Neutral: @Onesicksupra asked multiple questions regarding the vehicle's various components, such as the functionality of the interior and exterior lights, heated seats, and whether driving videos are available. The seller confirmed that all components, including the windshield washer pump, work properly while continuously providing updates and images of the car. Other commenters, including @adhesivo and @LesVR6, inquired about maintenance specifics, including the condition of the timing belt and whether certain parts had been replaced, with the seller acknowledging that while he is unsure about some aspects related to prior ownership, he has kept up with maintenance during his ownership.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about certain missing components, including the trim piece for the cigarette lighter mentioned by @LesVR6 and the scratches on the steering wheel column commented on by @adhesivo. Additionally, @LesVR6 sought clarification about the nature of the exhaust system, indicating that some details about the vehicle's overall modification could be clearer. While @adhesivo expressed a desire for detailed answers regarding maintenance, his inquiries pointed toward a slight unease about the vehicle's upkeep, specifically about oil consumption and parts replacement.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Boyhowdee praised the bike's great color combination, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @Scout60 noted the bike's beautiful and well-kept condition, despite expressing concern over its 23-year-old tires. @pennzo remarked on the bike being the last year of the forged crank and praised its construction, indicating that once certain issues are addressed, it turns into a 'beautiful bike for life.'
Neutral: Comments from @Andy_61 included inquiries about the bike's maintenance history, such as whether it still had the first tires and brake fluid, and if there were any leaks around the engine. @TreeHD suggested taking a photo of the tires' manufacturing date and mentioned that with only 78 miles, fluids would need to be flushed and changed. The seller, @BMW328NSKK, shared details about the bike, confirming it had been climate-stored and performed several maintenance checks, including fluid and filter changes, asserting that the bike is in excellent survivor condition.
Negative: @CorvairGA raised concerns about potential rust inside the gas tank, questioning the bike's reliability for long rides. @Scout60 reiterated the risks of using old tires, indicating that a flat at speed could lead to serious accidents, despite acknowledging the bike's beauty. Overall, there seems to be a common apprehension about the bike's age and condition, particularly its tires and tank, though the seller has attempted to alleviate some of these worries by providing detailed maintenance records and assurances.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's appearance and uniqueness. @HotRod73 praised it as a beauty, while @Nckstr184 and @Richy4fun highlighted their appreciation for the rare C15 model, stating that it deserves more recognition. @RossHeller noted the distinctive features of the GMC version compared to other trucks, reflecting its rarity and classic style. @hairyolds also appreciated the truck's overall appeal, despite suggesting some personal design changes such as changing the steering wheel cover.
Neutral: Several comments focused on inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and condition, indicating a desire for more detailed information. @Bell_Diver asked about the replacement engine's specifics, showing interest in its performance details. The seller, @truckfan, promptly offered to provide engine receipts and confirmed the performance of various vehicle components, including the air conditioning and undercarriage work. @Bell_Diver followed up with questions about the operational status of major safety features, to which the seller provided detailed answers.
Negative: There were some reservations expressed by commenters regarding certain aspects of the truck. @hairyolds expressed uncertainty about the red cab color, implying it may not fit the overall aesthetic as well as others might prefer. Additionally, while most features were confirmed operational, @truckfan conceded that the horn was not functioning, which could be seen as a minor drawback for potential buyers. Overall, while most comments were positive, these slight critiques indicated areas where perceptions could vary.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the impressive features of the 2004 Lexus LX470, especially its aesthetic appeal and upgraded performance capabilities. @lanierchris mentions that the vehicle has a 2.5 inch icon 4x4 lift kit along with brand new 33 inch Toyo Open Country all-terrain tires, making it visually striking and towering compared to other land cruisers. The truck also comes well-maintained with a new timing belt and recent service, which is reassuring for potential buyers. @SchlickT positively comments on the overall look of the truck, contributing to a favorable impression of its exterior and modifications.
Neutral: Several inquiries focus on the vehicle's condition and functionality, particularly regarding the adjustable height suspension that was disabled and replaced with heavier duty components. @kcmbat asks for clarification on how this was achieved, reflecting a shared curiosity among potential buyers about the vehicle’s technical details. @M3rryChristmas requests additional videos for better understanding of the engine's condition and driving experience. @bpcacquisitions also shows interest in the vehicle's appearance without the rooftop basket, indicating a desire to see different configurations of the truck.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition are raised in the comments, particularly regarding noise and potential mechanical issues. @M3rryChristmas notes some rattling noises in the driving video, attributing it to the roof rack, yet still expresses concern over multiple sources of sound, which could indicate wear and tear. Additionally, there are questions regarding the frame and the need for repairs like the front axle replacement as noted by @M3rryChristmas. These queries point to potential issues that a buyer may need to consider before making a purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its historical significance and aesthetic appeal. @PandJ referred to it as a 'fantastic car' with a rich, documented history. @ChefSpeedRacer and @BBK both praised its potential, with one calling it a 'cool car' that deserves a complete rebuild. Others noted its rarity and desirability, with @mikeg75 sharing that they own an identical model and have enjoyed the experience. @GasolineAlleyGarage (The Seller) emphasized the car's condition, detailing the extensive care it has received since being brought into their shop, including mechanical upgrades and the preservation of its original features. The overall sentiment was that this Jensen Interceptor Convertible is a gem cherished by enthusiasts.
Neutral: There were some inquiries about specific aspects of the vehicle's condition. @Joes124 raised questions regarding the functionality of accessories and the cooling system, while @ChefSpeedRacer noted the car's storage history. The seller responded to concerns about the vehicle's paint and interior, clarifying that some repair work had been done following a minor collision. The body panels were confirmed to be rust-free due to its Southern California origins, with no signs of significant damage noted. Some commenters, like @logocandy and @lindbrosracing, discussed the car's proper designation and shared experiences regarding the maintenance and operation of the Jensen series.
Negative: Conversely, some concerns were raised regarding performance issues and potential mechanical problems. @Joes124 pointed out that the air conditioning might require a trip to a shop, and @71jensen mentioned a probable misfire. @Tasmaniandevil reported that the car did not start on occasion, leading to discussions about the necessity of a carburetor rebuild. Other comments highlighted common issues inherent to the model, such as electrical gremlins and rust, which can arise if not maintained properly. Some comments also noted that despite the attractive presentation of the car, there are still repairs needed, signaling that the next owner might face challenges in restoring its full potential.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @22truckie appreciates the unique colors of the truck, noting they fit the retro era well. @weim55 highlights the distinctiveness of the ‘54 GMC in comparison to others, praising its unique design features such as the bold nose-grill and eye-catching instrument cluster. @57charlie supports the refurbishment quality, mentioning the truck's nice appearance and a cool hood ornament, indicating an overall positive impression of the vehicle's aesthetic and restoration.
Neutral: @Molson engages in discussions about the truck's details, asking the seller for additional photos of specific interior elements and sharing his own restoration experience with a similar model. This creates a sense of community among enthusiasts. Other commentors like @ccpanel and @KOBattalin-Fritz express interest in specific parts related to the vehicle and its condition, highlighting a neutral position that shows curiosity without being overtly critical or flattering.
Negative: @KOBattalin-Fritz raises concerns regarding the truck's condition, questioning the extent of rust on the frame and the presence of hanging wiring, which may affect the bidding process. He stresses the importance of receiving answers from the seller to inform potential buyers. @57charlie humorously notes the absence of a cigarette lighter, indicating a minor practical issue that could be seen as a drawback. @mntlbtkm also questions the lack of mounting for visors, suggesting that some expected features may be missing, which could deter some buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @MyDirtIsRed praised the vehicle's paint, describing it as gorgeous, indicating that the exterior finish has made a strong positive impression. Additionally, @AndyL commended the seller for their thoughtful design choice, specifically mentioning the decision not to cut a hole in the hood for the exhaust, which suggests a level of care and quality in the vehicle's modifications.
Neutral: The comments primarily focused on aesthetic aspects of the vehicle, with no specific performance-related comments made by the users. The mention of the dog dishes by @MyDirtIsRed can be seen as a light-hearted addition to the vehicle's charm rather than a practical feature, indicating a neutral perception of its features beyond looks.
Negative: There were no negative comments regarding the vehicle in the provided feedback. The absence of criticism suggests that the commenters did not have concerns worth mentioning in their observations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mick59 expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting the significant difference over 35 years and calling it a 'beautiful truck' with low mileage. @Andy2017 praised it as a rare find, particularly highlighting the 3.73 limited slip rear axle as an exciting feature. @robbiefarmer emphasized the value of the stick shift and cassette deck, suggesting any price for the vehicle is justified, while other comments echo the sentiment that this truck is a stunning example of the Ford Ranger.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @RoadandTrail and @jrshc, sought additional information about the truck, asking about the bed's length and for a close-up of the emissions sticker, respectively. @DanKZL1964 (The Seller) provided clarification regarding the recent addition of the emissions sticker photo and the bed's dimension, explaining that he would arrange a video of the truck running soon. Additionally, @ValpoMike requested more background on the truck's history, while @overthehill inquired about the reason behind the bed's removal.
Negative: @chips66 humorously noted that their Ford truck collection lacked this particular piece but lamented their marital status as a barrier to bidding. Some comments hinted at curiosity or concern about the truck's maintenance, with @overhill questioning the bed removal and @TreverJimmy wanting confirmation about it being a non-smoker's truck, indicating general skepticism about its condition and background.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's overall appearance and interior quality, highlighting features like the Cocoa brown interior, which @Cocoa praised as the best. @MohrImports (The Seller) emphasized the car's presentation in beautiful coastal settings of California, representing a long-standing connection to Porsche culture. The excitement about the Porsche Boxster S auction and the extensive mechanical service history, which included significant maintenance completed in the past year, was also well-received, showcasing the car's readiness for both casual and serious enthusiasts.
Neutral: Comments provided varying insights into the vehicle's paint history, with @TimBuckToo_2 questioning the paint meter readings and @campodf offering an analysis of those readings, which suggest that repainting has occurred on certain panels. @Namtrop66 indicated mixed feelings about bodywork suggesting it may not detract significantly from the car's desirability if done correctly. Additionally, @Thunderuppaul raised concerns regarding the car's driving history over the past five years, reflecting a cautious but interested stance toward its mechanical condition.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's condition and history. @TimBuckToo_2 highlighted potential inconsistencies in paint meter readings, implying possible repainting, while @rgpugh1969 expressed wariness about possible leaking from the RMS and maintenance issues that could arise from the car not being driven recently. @RonaldJefferson inquired about IMS service records, indicating worries about this critical component, while @Thunderuppaul specifically noted concerns regarding the car's overall mechanical condition due to its recent lack of use.
![]() |
162-Mile 2019 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport Coupe 3LT C7.R Drivers Series Package
1G1Y12D74K5113189
Lot 216992
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express enthusiasm for the 2019 Chevrolet Corvette Driver Series, particularly highlighting its beauty and rarity. @Mgh20180 compliments the car's stunning appearance, while @Hojo3rd shares firsthand experience with the vehicle, emphasizing its unique attributes such as the collaboration with Corvette engineers and its one-off status. The seller, @morrisonmotorco, effectively markets the vehicle as a piece of Corvette history, noting its limited production and exclusive features, which has garnered positive attention from bidders and commenters who see it as a great investment opportunity.
Neutral: Comments vary from curiosity about the car's specifications to discussions of its collector status. @newcarpro provides detailed information about the vehicle's features and specifications without expressing strong opinions. Some users, like @geeitup, and @Cody1Biscuit acknowledge the value of the vehicle but note the contrasting views on the automatic transmission versus manual transmission debate, highlighting a neutral stance on the vehicle’s driving dynamic.
Negative: Mixed feelings about the automatic transmission have surfaced from several users. @Gregc123 sarcastically quips about the contradiction of a 'Drivers Series' vehicle being automatic, and @Edwardth expresses disappointment over this feature, indicating a prevalent sentiment that a manual transmission would be more desirable. @Tigers196884 and @JBULLY call out the frequent criticism regarding the transmission choice, suggesting these comments detract from appreciation of the car's overall excellence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters praised the McLaren GT for its impressive design and performance, with @boaboyoz highlighting its striking Storm Grey color and the build quality as a standout feature. @GCGByron (The Seller) mentioned the car's super smooth twin-turbo engine, exceptional comfort, and attention it garners, calling it the most comfortable supercar. @Fuelieguy echoed this by emphasizing the McLaren's blend of usability, trunk space for trips, and superior performance, suggesting it is the pinnacle of McLaren engineering and reliability.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific details regarding the car's service history and warranty, with @jasonlbaptiste asking about the original options list and @wstaab seeking confirmation on a front lift option. @kevinckb6 noted the car's warranty had expired based on its original purchase date of November 16, 2021. @GCGByron (The Seller) clarified that although the original warranty has expired, a new warranty could still be purchased due to the late model's reliability. Additionally, @thatkidfromjersey provided a link to check the warranty status on Carfax.
Negative: Some comments reflected the need for better visuals, as @kkherman and others felt the auction photos did not do justice to the vehicle's true beauty. @GCGByron (The Seller) acknowledged this by expressing disappointment that the uploaded images fell short of showcasing the car adequately. Furthermore, there was a sense of urgency from commenters regarding the lack of information on service records, specifically as @bli888 and @Cosmo007 wanted detailed service documents to better assess the vehicle's history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ReimelMC (The Seller) highlights the 2005 BMW Z4 2.5i roadster as a stylish, low-mileage vehicle that offers engaging driving fun with its manual transmission. The car has been well-serviced, with recent maintenance including an oil change and a new clutch, ensuring reliability. Commentors like @mr_db appreciate the consistent servicing from respected BMW dealers, indicating the level of care that the vehicle has received over the years.
Neutral: Several commentors, including @CraigInPA, express their admiration for the vehicle, although @CraigInPA mentions that the black paint may obscure some styling lines on the side of the car. @sculptrock acknowledges it as a very nice entry-level sports car, while @BubRudy and @macarbon_johnnyb clarify the seats are made of leatherette rather than leather. The vehicle is praised for its features such as the power-operated convertible top and stability control, although some parties have noted the smaller engine and manual transmission may appeal to specific buyers.
Negative: @mr_db raises some concerns regarding the clutch, suggesting it may have been heavily used due to the stop-and-go nature of the driving environment. They also mention the need for better insight on tire date codes, hinting at potential issues with the aging of tires, even though they appear to be in good condition. Additionally, the presence of minor imperfections, like dressing specks on the gauge lenses, is pointed out, suggesting a need for attention to these cosmetic details that could affect the vehicle's overall appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @rofandofy praises the vehicle as fast, exotic, iconic, and rare, highlighting its impressive performance of 133 mph in 1979. @jotadave comments on the bike being a nice Jota America and appreciates the superior Cerriani front forks and user-friendly upgrades, including the EZ pull clutch and 4 pot Brembos. @TeddyGad adds that Laverdas are cool, noting a past purchase of a Laverda 750 SF2 and pointing out reliable parts sources like Wolfgang and DAM Classic Racing, also mentioning potential for a gas tank repair.
Neutral: @smincer (The Seller) provides information that the bike runs well but needs carb balancing and tuning, offering to send a startup video. They clarify that the bike has been ridden in the last two years and outlines some of the issues, suggesting that the rear brake might be sticky and there may be an alternator concern. @Mike_from_Los_Angeles asks for further details on the bike's condition and any records of past maintenance, expressing concerns about potential underlying issues due to its age and mileage.
Negative: @TeddyGad voices concern about the carb tuning, inquiring how well the bike runs with the current adjustments. @75NortonCommando comments on the 'absolute crying shame' regarding a dent in the gas tank, suggesting that it detracts from the bike's otherwise nice appearance. @JennyOXX6 initially misrepresents the grab rail's installation, leading to confusion, though they later acknowledge the error, and @jotadave addresses concerns about the grab rail's mounting, indicating that it might require minor adjustments.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance and history. @dhalperin13 noted it was a "very cool car from a great seller," while @Mcnellisrt highlighted the color transition from the original Oak Green to the current blue, calling it "gorgeous." Additional praise came from @alfriedesq, who described the 930 Turbo as "an amazing machine" that was one of the quickest cars of its time. @RecoveringAtty even reflected on how there's still nothing like the 911 Turbo after nearly 50 years, further emphasizing its enduring allure.
Neutral: The seller, @3pedalstable, shared extensive details about the car's background, including its factory specifications and documentation, such as the original California plates and maintenance records. He mentioned that the car was originally finished in Oak Green Metallic but has been repainted to Blue Metallic, which could be returned to Oak Green in the future for added value. Several users, like @K59644 and @Bojo13, inquired about the possibility of driving videos and PPI appointments, indicating interest in the car's performance and condition even though they were still in the consideration phase.
Negative: Some concerns were raised among the commenters, particularly regarding the vehicle's shifting, as @infraredcalvin suggested there might be issues with it. @Mattlikecars101 questioned whether repairs had been made to the passenger door due to previous minor accidents, also asking for a paint test. Furthermore, @Jimbo912 mentioned the absence of a Carfax report, showing interest in the vehicle's history, especially since data for cars older than 1981 can be difficult to obtain. These comments pointed to a mix of interest and caution among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the impressive nature of the 2020 Nissan GT-R Track Edition, emphasizing its rarity and superb specifications. @Vremacs-BAT described it as 'impressive,' while @boaboyoz called it a 'sensational specimen.' @jeffward25 noted it as the epitome of JDM cars, and the sentiment of the community reflects excitement and admiration for its features and performance. @nexusautobrokers (The Seller) expressed enthusiasm about being a leading GT-R dealer, highlighting that the car is built almost like a NISMO, which adds to its desirability.
Neutral: Several users engaged in discussions about the car's history and the market surrounding it. @hpizking mentioned valuing his own older GT-R while noting it wasn't highlighted in the seller's list. @yma10 recalled that the car had been listed for months before being sold, indicating some past uncertainty about its value. The conversations brought up the resale potential and the rarity of the model, suggesting a keen market interest in the vehicle and clarification on the current auction status.
Negative: Concerns about pricing and modifications emerged, with some users, like @flipwils11, seeking clarity on factory specifications versus modifications. @Bwcochran777 questioned the accuracy of previous sales prices, doubting the reported increase in value, and @2006m5 remarked on the lack of original options for carbon ceramic brakes. These comments reflect skepticism about the market strategy and the true value of the vehicle amid the excitement.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @qasim (The Seller) has responded to various inquiries regarding the vehicle, confirming that it runs and drives great. The seller provided reassurance that the car can be safely driven to Indiana, referencing operational videos that demonstrate the vehicle's functionality. Furthermore, @qasim mentioned that the car passed its most recent smog check in 2022, indicating its compliance with environmental regulations.
Neutral: The seller addressed questions about the vehicle's maintenance, including the scrapes on the underside caused by the car's low stance and the missing cover under the passenger headlight, which is in the process of being replaced. Regarding the lien status, @qasim clarified that the lien was resolved in early 2025, leaving the car free and clear, ensuring potential buyers that there are no outstanding claims on the vehicle.
Negative: While the overall feedback has been positive, there are concerns raised about potential maintenance, particularly regarding scrapes from normal driving conditions and the status of previous modifications, like the exhaust system. Commenters like @ErinEhrman expressed particular interest in the car's operational integrity and any hidden work not reflected on the Carfax, which implies a demand for thorough transparency concerning the vehicle's history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Oreo144 noted the vehicle's low mileage and expressed interest in how it was stored to maintain the battery life, indicating a positive impression of its condition. @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 highlighted the car's overall good shape, suggesting it is an excellent opportunity for someone interested in an older model, emphasizing its low maintenance and high reliability as a significant advantage. Many comments from potential buyers reflect excitement about the car's features and its value, suggesting it is a well-kept example of a Tesla Model S.
Neutral: Multiple users, including @BenGRNP and @Groovey, asked about specific features such as the infotainment system and service history, showing engagement with the vehicle's background. The seller, @red360, provided clarifications on various aspects of the car, including battery charge capabilities and the original infotainment system. This indicates that while there are positive sentiments about the car, there is also a level of curiosity and concern regarding its specifics that reflects the cautious nature of potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's age arose from commenters like @ikemey and @70GTO455HO, questioning the condition of the tires and potential hidden issues like drive unit problems common in older models. @terra_nova cautioned about risks associated with the large drive unit, suggesting that shortcomings in Tesla's service practices could leave buyers with costly repair decisions. @Oreo144 voiced concerns about the potential noise from the rear drive unit, hinting at a lack of trust in the vehicle's operational status despite an otherwise appealing exterior.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Teddy13 (The Seller) confirmed that the vehicle has been well-maintained, with all services performed by the same family's shop since 2008. The air conditioning is noted to blow ice cold, and the clutch shifts smoothly, indicating good mechanical condition. Additionally, @Teddy13 stated that the vehicle is rust-free and in good overall condition, which is a positive aspect for potential buyers.
Neutral: @Toro69 and @harrispatrickh raised inquiries about the vehicle's history, including its registration status over the past seven years and its ownership history. @Toro69 also asked for details regarding the condition of the tires and clutch, showing a balanced interest in the vehicle's condition without expressing strong opinions. These questions indicate that while potential buyers are curious, they seem to await more definitive answers before forming a judgment.
Negative: There are some concerns highlighted by @harrispatrickh regarding the vehicle not being registered for seven years, which raises red flags about potential issues or neglect. @Toro69's questions about rust and general mechanical condition suggest a lack of confidence in the vehicle's reliability. Overall, while there are positive confirmations from the seller, the lack of recent registration and ownership history may deter some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Catana246 describes the vehicle as having an original looking exterior with a fancy dash and seats, presenting a much nicer look compared to typical customized options. @Shawh, a proud owner of a similar model, praises the vehicle as an extremely nice example and wishes good luck to the consigner. @moneybags appreciates the workmanship on the vehicle but expresses a desire for it to be located in California. @Starky shares a personal positive experience with their own Series Land Rover and values the peaceful driving experience it offers, particularly noting the useful soft top addition.
Neutral: @GBRBiLL points out minor issues requiring attention, such as the front tires rubbing when steering and a crack in the lower radiator hose, but still considers it a nice rig considering it has the best running diesel they have heard in a while. @Murphy.dc (The Seller) provides clarification about a minor chassis repair and the vehicle's registration status, explaining it has never been in California. @moneybags seeks confirmation on the vehicle's reliability for a trip to Palm Springs, while @19Willys46 comments on the realistic expectations for driving a Series Land Rover, stating it is not designed for long cross-country trips, confirming their knowledge of the model.
Negative: @Fundango expresses concerns about the numerous issues that need addressing on the vehicle, questioning whether estimates have been received for the major problems noted. @moneybags, expressing doubt about the vehicle's capacity for a long journey, indicates they were not entirely satisfied with the responses they received from the seller regarding its long-distance viability. The comments hint at a lack of confidence in the vehicle's readiness for more extensive travel, reflecting apprehension about the necessary adjustments and maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Cadillac DeVille convertible, describing it as "absolutely beautiful" and a "delightful example." @Dollycat3 praised the vehicle's rare color and luxurious leather, envisioning it parked in upscale venues like Palm Springs. @BMcD pointed out it was a beauty in 'Topaz Gold,' a nod to its striking finish. Comments reflected emotional memories, with several users reminiscing about owning similar models or recalling teachers who kept their cars immaculate. @Hoppy18 made a playful mention of the car's value in a humorous calculation, suggesting excitement around its worth.
Neutral: The seller, @vfnrcc, provided thorough details about the car's history and current condition, noting it was owned by one family and maintained in solid condition. Several commenters, including @WJK and @MARTY_ROTH, raised specific questions about maintenance records, recent paintwork, and the functionality of various features like the A/C system. @MARTY_ROTH also highlighted the importance of addressing potential issues like a noise in the compressor. The seller responded openly to inquiries regarding mileage, overall mechanical condition, and the state of the undercarriage.
Negative: However, some concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition. @MARTY_ROTH pointed out areas of potential rust and pitting on the undercarriage components, questioning the thoroughness of the vehicle's inspection and detailing process. Additionally, users like @Drdodger humorously expressed reluctance about owning a gold car, indicating a subjective bias against the color. @WJK's inquiry about fluid leaks and rubber gaskets reflects a skepticism regarding the car's operational integrity despite its appealing presentation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 2009 Z06 has garnered enthusiastic praise for its rarity, with only 24 miles on the odometer. Commentors like @Vette2 highlight its status as one of the best Corvettes ever produced, attributing to it a top speed of 198 mph thanks to its powerful LS7 engine. The car appears in pristine condition, described as looking like it's right off the dealership floor. Some users express excitement over its collector's potential, advocating that this vehicle should be driven and enjoyed rather than just stored away, as suggested by @vegman58 who shares personal experiences with high-value Corvettes.
Neutral: While many appreciate the car's low mileage, there are varied opinions on the best course of action for its future. @Premierautofl (The Seller) mentions plans to change the oil and possibly replace the tires, indicating an intention to ensure it’s roadworthy should the new owner decide to drive it. Commentors such as @TonyTitan1 and @Jimatyes express curiosity about how to maintain it effectively, with discussions around servicing the valve guides and the implications of such low mileage on the vehicle's operability. There's also interest in ensuring the fuel was managed properly during its long-term storage.
Negative: Despite the excitement surrounding the car, some commentors raise concerns about its long period of inactivity. @Grand8000 questions the purpose of owning a car with only 24 miles, suggesting it's more of a trophy than a usable vehicle. There are also concerns from users like @Berkeley.Farmer regarding the management of fuel in the tank after years of non-use, and comments from @Catharpin sarcastically remark on the extraordinary worry about the vehicle's heads, portraying it as a near-museum piece rather than a traditional car. The conversation reflects a mix of admiration and skepticism over whether the investment in maintenance is necessary or even prudent for a vehicle of this nature.
![]() |
2,200-Mile 2021 Ford F-550 Super Duty Lariat Crew Cab Power Stroke 4×4 Overland Conversion
1FD0W5HT5MED40338
Lot 217021
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many users expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting its impressive features and build quality. @theweeb noted how quickly it gained attention, while others like @jeena80 found the vehicle's overall design and capability to be aesthetically pleasing and robust. The innovative construction, particularly the seamless integration of the camper and the truck's utilities, received praise, with @jyennock acknowledging it as an awesome build. Comments from @GoGamecocks and @BidderBuyer reflected admiration for its ruggedness, suggesting it could handle various terrains effortlessly, enhancing its desirability as an overland vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments focused on seeking clarification about the vehicle's specifications and features. @tussler, the seller, provided detailed responses to inquiries about weight, fuel capacity, and whether the camper could be detached from the truck, confirming its versatility. The completion of a custom flatbed and its design integration with the camper were also discussed, as expressed by @e36Francis and @scott_s. The comments pointed toward a potential buyer's interest in practical aspects and various usage scenarios, highlighting the vehicle's utility beyond mere aesthetics.
Negative: A few users raised concerns regarding possible imperfections and operational queries surrounding the vehicle. @Mr.Miata2008 questioned the fit of the spare wheel and mentioned inconsistencies in the images, while @ShiftHappens sought clarity on the vehicle's steering alignment. There were also mentions of dubious listings attempting to scam interested buyers, as @tussler cautioned against non-official sales channels, describing a situation where a dealer was falsely presenting the vehicle for sale. This concern for authenticity detracted from the excitement expressed by many in the thread.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received positive comments regarding its condition and the thoroughness of the auction process. @Jcptom praised the seller for a seamless purchasing experience, and @HKMotors (The Seller) emphasized that the Q7 is in exceptional condition despite its mileage. The seller has maintained up-to-date service records and reassured potential buyers that the vehicle is ready for enjoyment with no immediate repairs needed. Many commenters expressed satisfaction with the detailed information and photos provided, enhancing their confidence in the auction.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about the maintenance history and specifications of the Q7, showcasing a keen interest in understanding the vehicle better. @JPKaudiRS6 and @UscPhd97_ asked about the window sticker and specifics regarding services like the timing chain and oil leak repairs. @valleyweather and @Gorr007 sought clarification on common maintenance items like wheel bearings and original wheels, indicating a general curiosity about the vehicle's upkeep. The dialogue indicated that potential buyers were looking for solid answers to ensure transparency in the auction.
Negative: Some comments highlighted concerns that detracted from the overall positive reception of the vehicle. @Gorr007 raised issues with specific lights on the dashboard and had trouble accessing the Carfax report, which left some uncertainty around the car's history. @Uby67vw1958 and @Gorr007 also mentioned difficulties in opening the Carfax link, suggesting potential technical issues. Overall, while the comments were predominantly positive or neutral, these concerns indicated that not all potential buyers felt completely reassured, reflecting the importance of clear communication and accessible documentation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received praise for its overall functionality. Commentors highlighted that all systems work as they should, indicating a strong reliability and performance of the truck. This feedback can instill confidence in potential buyers about the vehicle's condition and usability.
Neutral: There are inquiries about the vehicle's exterior condition, specifically regarding chips and scratches in the paint. Comments from @rsavage show interest in understanding if the truck has been subjected to winter conditions, suggesting a desire for clarity on how it has been maintained.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the vehicle's appearance, particularly the potential for chips and scratches on the paint. The question posed by @rsavage indicates a cautious outlook, as buyers often look for assurance about the vehicle's history and wear, which might affect their purchasing decision.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @VegasJeff believes this 440i is a rare gem, noting its unique features such as the manual transmission, M Sport package, and all-wheel drive. With only 34,000 miles, he emphasizes its iconic and reliable engine, coupled with an attractive color scheme. He expresses optimism that someone will be thrilled to own this vehicle, wishing the seller good luck. Meanwhile, @dna.autowholesale highlights the car's immaculate condition and how it was meticulously cared for by the previous owner, with no modifications and super low miles, reinforcing it as an 'Ultimate Driving Machine'.
Neutral: @Jpmp0113 raises a valid question regarding the availability of service records to address potential common issues in similar vehicles, suggesting an interest in ensuring the car's reliability. @dna.autowholesale responds by confirming that they have maintenance records indicating only oil change services were required after 24,000 miles. Additionally, @1wjosowski inquires about the car's all-wheel-drive capability, to which @Jtbjr points out that the badge on the trunk confirms it as xDrive, adding a level of reassurance about the vehicle's performance capabilities.
Negative: @avaz333 questions whether the car is drive-off ready and requests confirmation of any previous BMW service invoices, particularly regarding the pinion-seal repair and fluid changes. @dna.autowholesale admits that they do not have access to past records but notes that the most recent inspection was completed at BMW of Roxbury, alongside an oil change. Nevertheless, the inability to provide comprehensive service history may raise some concerns for potential buyers about the ongoing maintenance of the vehicle.
![]() |
Turbocharged 1963 Chevrolet Corvair Monza 900 Convertible 4-Speed
30967W278320
Lot 217025
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the value of the vehicle, emphasizing its bright yellow color and the sentiment attached to it as a cherished possession of the seller's late husband. @shortwidow77 expresses hope that the car will find a new home where it can be loved and appreciated as much as it was in the past. She reassures potential buyers about the condition of the car, noting that the top has no tears and is intact, which is an important selling point.
Neutral: Some users expressed curiosity about the car, with @SMB85 asking for pictures with the top down and for a driving video to get a better sense of the vehicle's appeal. Additionally, @67AC140 mentioned that the new owner should prepare to replace the tires, which indicates there may be some maintenance considerations to keep in mind. @shortwidow77, the seller, acknowledges these comments and explains her limitations with photography, particularly in getting the top down for clearer pictures.
Negative: There are some concerns raised about the car's condition and potential maintenance needs. @67AC140 points out the tiny tires, implying that they may be inadequate, and @sir_keith agrees that there are several other issues to address. @shortwidow77 admits to not being well-versed in the vehicle and mentions she never drove it or made modifications, suggesting a lack of familiarity with its operational aspects. This could raise some doubts for prospective buyers regarding the vehicle's overall upkeep.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Scliffe remarked on the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, describing it as a beautiful car. Many comments appreciated the seller's prompt responses and thorough explanations about the car's condition, particularly regarding the A/C system and other mechanical aspects. @rmtechno, the seller, reassured potential buyers by stating that the A/C and all components are functioning properly and that the car runs smoothly with well-maintained systems.
Neutral: @wildwillie4 expressed interest in viewing the car, indicating that they live in the nearby area. @DomingoSpada raised questions about the car's Carfax report, pointing out missing entries for several years, to which @rmtechno clarified the vehicle's history and previous ownership. Additionally, @Germanrides requested clarification about a parts list and the condition of the tires, receiving informative responses from the seller regarding both inquiries.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @DomingoSpada regarding gaps in the Carfax report, which might hint at a lack of transparency in the vehicle's history. @Bobkat971 inquired if there were any issues with the car's performance. Although @rmtechno claimed that the car runs flawlessly, potential buyers may still worry about the reliability of a 25-year-old vehicle and the absence of detailed records for some years.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and performance. @Pettyfan43 noted its beauty, sharing good wishes for the seller. @FXRcR1 reminisced about his past experience with a similar model, describing it as 'drop dead gorgeous' and a 'real treat' to ride, emphasizing the emotional connection owners have with these bikes. Furthermore, @caffine highlighted the vehicle's rare features, including its upgraded exhaust and quality suspension components, underscoring its status as a well-maintained, enjoyable motorcycle.
Neutral: Some comments sought clarification and additional information about specific aspects of the vehicle. @ritzritzb asked about the repainting of certain parts and requested pictures of the bike's bodywork for better understanding. @Baddogdesmo and @Ecturbogsx pointed out technical details regarding the bike's engine and features, suggesting that potential buyers might want to confirm details such as the engine type and the repairs made to the bike.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the condition of parts and the bike's history. @fclabbe (The Seller) admitted that the fading of the wheel paint resulted from harsh cleaning products and confirmed the need for repainting to restore them to pristine condition. Additionally, there was an acknowledgment of some fragility in the bike's design, particularly with certain fairing clips. Overall, while the bike has a lot of positives, potential buyers may want to be cautious about the condition of specific parts and repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The seller, @FrankieVespa, is responsive and reassuring, confirming that the vehicle title is indeed clean and clear. He emphasizes that the warning lights were simply to demonstrate their functionality and assures potential buyers that there are no engine issues, describing the vehicle as a "perfect running machine". Many commenters, such as @dcblatte, have expressed enthusiasm about bidding on the vehicle, indicating a positive reception to the seller's assurances.
Neutral: Inquiries from potential buyers, like @NJPI1963 and @Rodzie, revolve around the title details and shipping options. @dcblatte is particularly interested in shipping logistics, while @Rick_Christensen seeks clarification on past repairs done to the vehicle. The seller addresses these neutral questions by offering to assist with shipping and providing details about the repairs, noting the minor nature of the past damage.
Negative: Some commenters, including @arp35, express concern over the title being in an insurance company's name and question the implications of this, suggesting a possibility of it being a salvaged title. They seek further clarification on why the title has not been transferred to @FrankieVespa’s name, implying potential complications in the sale. The seller reassures them that all titles have been verified and that the vehicle is not salvaged, but uncertainty still lingers with some commenters.
![]() |
192-Mile 2006 Chrysler Crossfire Special Edition Roadster 6-Speed
1C3AN55L96X065083
Lot 217042
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their love for the aesthetic appeal and performance of the Chrysler Crossfire, with @AutoCan declaring their passion for driving their own 2007 Crossfire Coupé and expressing a desire to own the listed vehicle. @Gary_T1 noted that the vehicle's striking color and clean undercarriage instilled confidence in the stated low mileage of 192, while @ShineOn highlighted the rarity and uniqueness of the model being sold. Additionally, @VantageAuto emphasized the credibility of their business, asserting trust and honesty in their listings, which add to potential buyers' confidence in the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Several individuals provided insights into the specifications and features of the Chrysler Crossfire, discussing its manufacturing details and the equipment included. Comments from @newcarpro listed the standard equipment, and @BrentMcM clarified the significance of the special edition model that the Crossfire belongs to, including details on the tires and condition. @H2wk3ye raised a few questions about the vehicle's history, including discrepancies in mileage and the condition of specific components, while others sought information on the production and variations of the available models.
Negative: Conversely, some commenters focused on potential red flags associated with the vehicle, questioning the accuracy of the mileage recorded on the Carfax report. @Suburbansilk pointed out evidence of repainting and wear that could imply the car had been driven more than claimed, while @Anyoldcar warned about the need to replace old tires regardless of their appearance. The interactions included skepticism about the seller's claims, with @H2wk3ye expressing concerns about the top hydraulics, and @CMC300M noting that inaccurate comments can sometimes surface in online listings, potentially affecting bidding and pricing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments about the 1966 Harley-Davidson FLH Electra Glide motorcycle predominantly express admiration for its stunning restoration. @MSCLASSICCARSLLC, the seller, highlights its detailed nut and bolt restoration, mentioning zero miles since completion, appealing color scheme, and quality of materials used, such as powder-coated parts and reupholstered seats. Commenters like @Gary_T1 emphasize its potential value as an outstanding classic example, while @Mouse51 calls it the "King of the Road" for its era, reflecting a high appreciation for the bike's aesthetics and historical significance.
Neutral: Several comments delve into technical specifics regarding the motorcycle's features and historical context, including the introduction of the Shovelhead engine and electric starter. @EAO495 and @Panhead48 engage in a dialogue, providing corrections and insights about the bike's engineering history. Additionally, @jandrvending raises an important point about the uniqueness of the 1966 tank design, contributing to the overall technical discussion surrounding the bike's restoration and relevance among collectors.
Negative: Conversely, there are concerns raised about certain aspects of the motorcycle's restoration. @STA1 critiques the potential overuse of powder coating instead of painting, suggesting a non-originality in some parts and questioning the operational reliability of the bike given it still needs commissioning despite starting. @Sprinkman expresses a desire for a driving video to ensure confidence in its condition, showing a level of skepticism towards the motorcycle's readiness for use after restoration. This sentiment highlights a cautious perspective among some bidders who fear hidden issues in a vehicle they've not seen in action.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @1Marauder expressed excitement with a simple WOW!, while @Barryward complimented the vehicle's aesthetics in nighttime conditions, indicating that it looks good even in the dark. @Mercury88 noted its uniqueness as a Canadian market 351 V8, which adds to the car's appeal due to its rarity. @borninthe60s described the Lincoln as very nice, particularly appreciating the chrome lower body work.
Neutral: @Thesenator (The Seller) provided updates about the vehicle's condition, confirming that the vinyl top is almost champagne in color and that all operational features such as the radio, antenna, power seats, windows, air conditioning, and locks work properly. @Todd1969 and @frankrigor asked questions about specific features and dimensions, while @Tigers196884 compared it to a Bill Blass version without the signature details. @bp16418 reached out to the seller requesting a visit to see the car in person.
Negative: @Todorichjr's inquiry about whether the gas tank had ever been replaced reflects a concern regarding the car's maintenance history, while @Thesenator (The Seller) admitted that he did not know the answer. This may highlight a potential uncertainty in the vehicle's upkeep, which could be a point of caution for prospective buyers.
![]() |
2022 Ford F-250 Super Duty Lariat FX4 Power Stroke 4×4 MegaRexx SVN
1FT8W2BT4NEF10737
Lot 217034
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @fauxtool describes the vehicle as "seriously rad," highlighting its cool factor. @NYAZ gives an enthusiastic shout-out, comparing it to a "Brady Bunch Vehicle" and wishing good luck with the sale. @yblock57 appreciates the vehicle's overall design, referring to it as a "very nice rig" and suggesting it could make a great family hauler. @n8sfavtoy notes its potential for overlanding, valuing the cab access it provides without needing to exit the vehicle.
Neutral: Several users have commented on the vehicle's color consistency, with @SoExSo and @ColoradoGuy1 raising concerns about the rear half potentially being a different shade. @bretcox87 (The Seller) addressed these inquiries, explaining that differences may be due to lighting and confirming that the vehicle is all Stone Gray Metallic. Others, like @alanm96ss and @bretcox87, discussed the truck's specifications, confirming it has a 6’8” bed and clarifying details about its features, such as towing capabilities and additional A/C for rear passengers.
Negative: @toadlaw expressed concerns about a potential paint color mismatch at the back of the truck. @alanm96ss questioned whether there was wood in the frame above the rear axle, leading to further clarification from @bretcox87 (The Seller) about the structural components. Some comments indicate a degree of skepticism regarding the vehicle’s appearance and its functional attributes, suggesting that not all onlookers are fully convinced of the seller's claims about its uniformity and performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as absolutely beautiful, while @davidhunternyc calls it very pretty, highlighting its simple and ergonomic design. @rwantin appreciates the attractive white over blue color scheme, noting that the vehicle is "barely broken in." Additionally, @Kenny360 expresses admiration by simply stating "Legendary!!!"
Neutral: @CarsGlobal (The Seller) responds to various inquiries, confirming that the temperature gauge works properly and detailing that the vehicle features the original Becker Radio. They also indicate that the accessories, such as the power antenna and air conditioning, function well, with the A/C being particularly cold, and they provide updates on specific features in response to questions from prospective buyers. For instance, they mention that both the fuel and oil pressure gauges are operational, as shown in the promotional video.
Negative: Concerns from potential buyers arise as @andrewmoroz questions the authenticity of a light white coating on the underbody, seeking clarification about its purpose and existence of pre-treatment photos. @Redrover4455 expresses doubt regarding whether the fuel and oil pressure gauges are working properly, as they seem unresponsive in the video. Additionally, @CarsGlobal (The Seller) provides an update indicating difficulty in making the cruise control operational, which may add to buyer uncertainty.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GeorgeLyons (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a well-kept Defender, emphasizing its exceptional care and maintenance history. The vehicle was never abused or off-road, and it has had little exposure to harsh winter conditions, which makes it stand out among its peers that are now over 30 years old. Commenter @WAGONBOYTD praises the example of the vehicle, noting the condition of the hinges as a positive indicator of its overall quality, suggesting that it is a solid investment that likely won't require much additional work.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions about the vehicle's specifics, such as @GBRBiLL questioning the production number and @Chattanooga inquiring about paintwork and the originality of the jump seats. @Fitzroya provides insight about the seating capacity and raises points about the vehicle's original specifications, showing that while there are questions, the overall interest in the authenticity and details of the vehicle remains strong among auction participants. Meanwhile, @GeorgeLyons responds to inquiries, providing clarity on the vehicle’s condition and history, which keeps the discussion informative.
Negative: There are concerns regarding @GeorgeLyons’ claim that the vehicle has never been off-road, highlighted by @Johnny3 who points out the presence of Nantucket over-sand permits on the bumpers, which implies otherwise. @GeorgeLyons acknowledges this oversight, stating it was a mistake rather than an attempt to deceive. Additionally, @jprobson asks for more photos to confirm specific details, reflecting that there are some trust issues among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @headude expresses excitement about wanting a Ural to transport dogs, highlighting a sentimental wish. @GBRBiLL recalls positive experiences with a Ural, mentioning its fun factor and the engaging conversations it sparks with strangers. @stagewex, an experienced Ural owner, shares love for the vehicle, emphasizing its reliability and the enjoyable modifications made by the seller, bringing a sense of nostalgia and joy.
Neutral: @willt1a (The Seller) responds to comments, providing details about the vehicle's features and addressing inquiries about bringing it to Dallas. They indicate comfort at highway speeds of 60 mph but prefer the scenic routes instead. The seller also mentions the enhancements in the latest models and opens the floor for additional requests for pictures, showing a willingness to engage with potential buyers and answer their questions.
Negative: @colbob questions the seller about comfort at highway speeds, which may imply concerns about the vehicle's performance on highways. There's no outright negativity in the comments, but the seller's responses to various inquiries indicate a need for clarity on certain aspects of the vehicle, such as health issues affecting transportation and speed perceptions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Carbine123 described the vehicle as an "Awesome 997!" which highlights the positive impression it leaves on viewers. @boaboyoz complimented the car's stylish appearance, calling it "Basalt Black Metallic magic" and wishing the seller good luck with the auction. Furthermore, @911c4s remarked that the 911 is a "great example" and noted that it represents a beautiful appreciating asset, hinting at its investment potential. @collectiveauto (The Seller) shared their personal excitement, citing the 997 as the sweet spot in the 911 lineage, emphasizing its balance of power and driver engagement, along with its elegant design.
Neutral: @wannabuyaporsche raised a question about the unusual circumstances of the vehicle being for sale in Florida while titled in New Jersey, thus seeking clarification on the matter. In response, @Notanothermiata explained that the seller is a dealer who acquired the car and can reassess the title for the new owner, suggesting that this is a standard practice in the industry. @collectiveauto (The Seller) confirmed this and offered insight into the process, inviting any further queries from interested buyers about the vehicle's history.
Negative: @Notanothermiata's comment hints at skepticism regarding the dealer's intent, suggesting the vehicle is merely a flip and might not have the same value as a privately owned car with a clearer history. Additionally, @INTERCARUSA's inquiries about the aftermarket installations, including the reverse camera, indicate a concern about potential modifications that might complicate the car's condition; they were particularly cautious about any drilling into the vehicle, suggesting that modifications can sometimes negatively affect a buyer's perception of a car's integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Markymark138 appreciates the communication about the vehicle, indicating responsiveness from the seller. @gumby74 expresses optimism about someone snagging the car at a good price and wishes the seller good luck, which reflects a positive outlook on the transaction and the vehicle's potential for sale. The seller, @PAJO68, conveys confidence by stating that all lights, wipers, and most gauges work properly, thus reassuring potential buyers about the vehicle's functionality.
Neutral: @brad12345 raises a valid question regarding potential duties or tariffs for cross-border purchases, highlighting a concern that is neither outright positive nor negative but rather practical. @Ektl6900 also contributes a neutral remark indicating geographical context by commenting on the likelihood of tariffs based on the car's origin and destination. @knuckles-r-busted describes how the engine runs roughly until fully warmed up, providing important insights into the vehicle's condition without a clear positive or negative bias.
Negative: @spoonchops questions why @PAJO68 is selling the car so soon after purchase, hinting at concerns about the vehicle's condition. @Ron240 criticizes the limited number of pictures available for potential buyers, suggesting it may hinder the sales effort and raises concerns about the vehicle's features, including a potential radiator issue. @Daverich88 and @IveGotATransAmProblem request more specific information about rust under the car, indicating that they perceive a risk that needs to be addressed prior to making a bid.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Eboy999 appreciates the vehicle's *proper* dished wood steering wheel design, indicating a level of quality and aesthetic appeal. @josephvman expresses fondness for the car, mentioning that he had a similar enjoyable experience with his own. Overall, the comments reflect a general admiration for the car's appearance and quality, suggesting it has desirable features that attract potential buyers.
Neutral: @vdeorchis, the seller, provides detailed information in response to inquiries. He states that the A/C needs a charge but confirms the compressor is functioning. He also mentions that the tires are about 5 years old and in good shape, and provides assurance about the car's performance despite not having a compression test done. The seller clarifies the history of the vehicle, revealing that a rebuilt transmission was installed three years prior and that the car has been maintained under the care of a reputable repair dealer.
Negative: @rjwhiteAlfa raises concerns about the vehicle's accident history, expressing disappointment in the lack of information available about it. This sentiment of uncertainty extends to @andywrench's inquiries regarding additional service records, including details about the engine performance and shifting quality. The mention of the unknown accident contributes to a cautious perspective on the vehicle's overall condition.
![]() |















































































































































































