Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
![]() |
Positive: @denbeste_motorsports describes the vehicle as an absolutely stunning 50th Anniversary 427 Cobra, highlighting its rarity as only 1 of 25 with an aluminum body. Many commenters agree on its beauty and uniqueness, with @Dollycat3 labeling it superb on every level. @WSario expresses admiration for the car's craftsmanship, suggesting DenBeste Motorsports likely did a remarkable job finishing it. Overall, the car has garnered a great deal of positive attention, emphasizing both its aesthetics and historical significance.
Neutral: Several commentators discuss the rarity and features of the vehicle, including @MRM, who points out that it is one of only 50 produced with an aluminum body. The collector community engages in discussions regarding the manufacturing processes involved, referencing Kirkham Motorsports, a key player in the production of these rare cars. @ChiefBlueMeanie mentions the importance of the transmission type, showing a shared knowledge and appreciation among collectors about the technical aspects of these vehicles.
Negative: On the less favorable side, @mrtew humorously notes that the car's supposed rarity seems diminished by the presence of others in background photos, suggesting a contradiction in the claims of uniqueness. Additionally, @rightsaidfred makes a joke about the urgency to sell a house to afford this vehicle, adding a layer of skepticism about its price. While the vehicle is widely appreciated, these comments hint at some underlying incredulity regarding the car's pricing and the market for such luxury collector items.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @moto.borgotaro (The Seller) presents the MV America as a 'world class' motorbike with only 49 miles, emphasizing its untouched, original perfection, claiming it to be the best low mileage America he has encountered in 20 years. @MultiWheels echoes this sentiment, calling the bike a 'piece of history' and encourages potential buyers to 'BUY THIS BAD BOY' for it could add years to their lives. Other users such as @Knuckles-R-Busted comment on the bike's remarkable appearance, noting how it looks new, while @Dak92159 suggests that it should be enjoyed as a ride rather than a display piece, further pointing to the bike's desirable nature.
Neutral: Several comments touch on the bike's original features and history. @moto.borgotaro details that the solo seat can be adapted for a passenger, while @Jona.for discusses how the seat design differs from a standard model. @bobofohio reflects on motorcycle pricing history and comments on the rarity of a bike like this, hinting at its investment value as opposed to its utility. @NCR600TT explores how the original tool roll looks and mentions its historical significance, suggesting a blend of nostalgia and curiosity among enthusiasts about vintage bikes.
Negative: Nevertheless, there are apprehensions about the bike not being ridden. @WIHIII expresses disappointment that it remains 'almost a virgin,' likening it to not fully experiencing something beautiful, while @kkherman points out that although it is stunning, it is often not driven by most owners. @750GT1974 humorously compares not riding the exotic bike to not being intimate with a supermodel, implying that keeping it pristine might lead to a lack of enjoyment. Concerns about small glitches known in these models are raised by @MercuryKG7H, pointing towards a potential issue for the next owner.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the 550 Maranello as "magic" with a stunning Blu Le Mans Metallic finish that is complemented by a beautiful beige interior. Commentors like @cardude76 and @FXRcR1 praise the vehicle's beauty, with @cardude76 highlighting its thorough presentation. The vehicle's strong cosmetic appeal is emphasized through numerous comments, with users noting its excellent condition and rich color combination, making it a stylish specimen worthy of admiration.
Neutral: Garage44 (The Seller) provides detailed insights about the car's history, including its import from Japan, the extensive servicing it underwent, and its striking specifications, like the debossed fenders for the shields. Comments from @pkbanc and @MANDREWS reflect curiosity about the repainting of the car, with insights shared about Japanese culture's approach to vehicle aesthetics. The seller assures buyers of the vehicle's mechanical integrity and offers support with any additional repairs that may arise before the sale.
Negative: While the car is held in high regard overall, there are a few minor grievances mentioned by commenters. There are reports of some touch-ups needed on the front bumper and issues with the passenger side sun visor, which @Garage44 addresses by explaining the necessary modifications. Additionally, @RacerKurt and @cardude76 express concerns about rear window delamination and the potential cost of repairs, indicating that despite the car's beauty, it does have areas needing attention.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bordeaux points out that the 356B has everything matching, which makes it highly desirable. @nine17K describes the car as absolutely gorgeous and arguably the best all-around 356 variant, highlighting its appeal. @buellwinkle expresses strong admiration for the car, stating they regretted selling theirs and praising the attractive design from every angle. @spg356 notes the meticulous nature of the owner, indicating that purchasing the car also means buying into the owner's careful maintenance and passion for classic vehicles.
Neutral: @Peaceful100 (The Seller) provides a detailed description of the car, emphasizing its award-winning status and excellent condition. The seller mentions notable features like the rare original royal blue color, matching numbers, and various included accessories such as tonneau covers and a complete tool set. @MatthewsAuto shares their historical experience with the car and its past awards, adding authenticity to the vehicle's reputation. @dontlabelme raises concerns about conflicting information regarding upholstery and engine specifications, prompting clarifications from the seller.
Negative: @Ducboy23 expresses concerns about the history of rust in Florida cars, questioning the completeness of the repairs and whether the rust has been fully addressed. @dontlabelme also points out inconsistencies in the vehicle description, highlighting potential issues with the appraisal's accuracy. @weissach critiques the combination gauge's design as inappropriate, indicating a potential flaw in the vehicle's dashboard configuration, while @ralt12 suggests that the gauge setup might have been intentional.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters generally appreciate the aesthetic and condition of the vehicle. @Jojogolong expressed admiration for the color combination and the European bumpers and lights, while @nds complimented the overall ride quality. @Luz_do_sol highlighted the vehicle's long history with a single owner and noted its well-maintained condition. The seller, @DavisSellCar246, emphasized that the car is in perfect condition for its age, supported by a recent thorough service by professionals who were impressed by its maintenance history. @Waltguy praised the vehicle's beauty and offered positive recommendations for the seller to address inquiries from potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments included neutral inquiries about the car's specifications and history. @Vanand asked about the engine's timing chain while @nds requested details regarding the air conditioning and potential integration with modern the stereo system. @Aldendahani sought clarification on any service records and queries about visible blemishes or rust on the vehicle. Commenters also showed interested in the history of the car by asking about the previous owner's records and the soft top's condition.
Negative: Some comments pointed out potential concerns or gaps in information regarding the car. @nds and @JeffreyFl questioned technical aspects, including the possibility of integrating modern technology with the vehicle and concerns about its compliance with California regulations due to a catalytic converter query. @NBC79 specifically sought confirmation regarding the new soft top's status, hinting at possible confusion or uncertainty from the seller. Overall, the seller @DavisSellCar246 acknowledged these inquiries but reiterated a lack of detailed technical knowledge, which may leave some commenters seeking more assurance about the vehicle's readiness for sale.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its unique characteristics and modifications. @LMGun celebrated it as a real 'Gremlin at the strip' and applauded the AMC brand, reminiscing about past drag racing experiences. @pepfoot's excitement was evident with a simple but enthusiastic 'Hell. Yes. 🙌', while @Indetrucks noted a wish for a bigger garage to accommodate such a cool car. Additionally, @Middler89 found it awesome and wondered how it didn't require a wheelie bar, showcasing a general admiration for the vehicle's performance.
Neutral: Several comments touched on nostalgic memories associated with the Gremlin. @no.radar reflected on memories tied to the car's iconic status with 'Ah, the memories...', while @johnbennett103 shared his experience learning to drive in a Gremlin X, although noting how different this particular vehicle is. @Ranchero65 brought up a humorous anecdote about the car's presence in a K-Mart parking lot, adding a lighthearted touch to the conversation. Comments from @gauldingr provided good luck wishes, indicating encouragement from the community surrounding the vehicle’s sale without expressing strong preferences either way.
Negative: There were few critical remarks, though @Habu2 had to delete their comment after misreading the ad, which suggests some confusion regarding the listing. Additionally, @sludgo made a humorous remark about a period road test included in the listing, hinting that the car may have idiosyncrasies that could vary from expectations. These comments suggest that while there is significant positive sentiment, there are also minor concerns or lighthearted skepticism regarding the car's specifics.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @JAY-Z praises the vehicle as an amazing evolution over the last 50 years, stating it is well-equipped with the right options and has a great look with the tartan seats. @boaboyoz describes the 992.1 Turbo 50 Years as drop-dead gorgeous with a beautiful build, while @GLWTA,GDogg expresses enthusiasm for starting the week off with this fantastic car. @turghoe finds it beautiful despite the absence of an aero kit, and @aerosmith appreciates its clean look, mentioning the stunning appearance of the wheels in Jet Black.
Neutral: @Tghooper mentions the lane assist feature but notes the vehicle has not been driven much. @garnerp questions whether the build sheet indicates the presence of front axle lift, while @mshobe jokes about cars like this needing a drive assist feature. @jcbertin calls the spec of the 992.1 Turbo S the greatest seen on BaT. @legend inquires about the side decals, to which @kwattsandco (The Seller) responds that the car was ordered without them. @RepoRob emphasizes the importance of carefully reading the car's disclosure.
Negative: @BMWE90Guy asks what is special about the 50 Years edition beyond the badges, implying skepticism about its value. @porsche1986 humorously suggests that they probably charge $100k extra just for the badges. @1porsche_geek queries about the loudness of the sport exhaust and whether the rims are interchangeable, indicating a lack of clarity on specifics. @turbhoe expresses disappointment about the absence of the aerokit, while @garnerp's questioning of the front axle lift feature reflects concern over missing options.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle, a McLaren 570s Spider in striking Mantis green, has garnered enthusiastic comments regarding its aesthetic appeal and upkeep. @rjthompson6358 (The Seller) emphasizes that the car has been meticulously cared for, stored in a climate-controlled garage since early 2021, which has resonated well with potential buyers. @wmelfi shares their confidence in the seller's dedication to the car's maintenance, asserting that every service was promptly addressed by professionals. Other users, like @MSCLASSICCARSLLC and @Mageez, laud the vehicle for its captivating color and unique presence.
Neutral: Several comments highlight the vehicle's history, including a windshield replacement by the first owner and the recent concern about a crack in the driver's side hinge. @westalbert raises a question regarding potential leaks from the windshield, to which @rjthompson6358 (The Seller) reassures them that there have been no leaks or issues experienced. The seller also mentions the tires being replaced in early 2024, accumulating only 600 miles since, which adds to the vehicle's value proposition for prospective buyers.
Negative: However, there are a few critical observations. @gelles questions the seller's claim of meticulous care due to the unaddressed hinge issue, prompting a detailed explanation from @rjthompson6358 (The Seller) about the evaluation process undertaken. Furthermore, @Chrismoe expresses concern about the high cost for the hinge repairs, though the seller reaffirms that only one hinge currently shows a crack and it does not require immediate replacement. Despite these concerns, responses suggest a balanced dialogue surrounding the car's condition and maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous comments highlight the vehicle's impressive aesthetics and functionality. @Cenzoooo (The Seller) emphasizes that the car's cleaner look without the spoiler enhances its appeal, and several users, including @onehussler and @JakePM, agree that the 'wing delete' option looks fantastic. @Cenzoooo also mentions the practical features, like the automatic nose lift that makes navigating troublesome spots easier, and the spacious frunk that accommodates various items, making it a versatile option for weekend trips. Users express admiration for the car's striking Elkhart Lake Blue color, with @Cenzoooo describing it as both eye-catching and elegant, a sentiment echoed by potential buyers who are captivated by its standout finish.
Neutral: Comments regarding the car's condition and specifications are mixed. @SimRace30 raises a question about the original tires' tread depth, and @Cenzoooo reassures them that the tires are in great shape, indicating they have enough tread left for another 8-10k miles. The seller also clarifies that the vehicle features the FE1 "soft suspension" and a front axle lift, providing additional comfort and practicality. @billeeG discusses their experience with tires on another vehicle, sharing insights on longevity and performance, while @Kristianarafat queries the Z51 package and Magna Ride, showing interest in the car's performance specifications.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism about the vehicle's value. @Kristianarafat queries the market pricing, suggesting that the first model year may not command as much interest now due to newer updates and features in later models. This idea is reinforced by @cowhow, who expresses disappointment over the price despite admiring the car, implying hesitance about committing to such an investment given the vehicle's age. @billeeG questions the additional horsepower claimed due to the red engine cover, seeking clarity on the car's specifications and their legitimacy, which hints at some uncertainty regarding the seller's assertions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @PapasGarage starts the excitement for the bidding on a "great looking 1972 K-5" Blazer, which @boaboyoz describes as a "delight" with its stunning metallic green and white colors. @melika61 (The Seller) shares that this custom 1972 Chevrolet K5 Blazer underwent a thorough frame-off restoration and modification, making it a well-crafted vehicle that combines classic beauty and modern performance. The impressive build includes high-end features like a 500 hp LS3 engine, upgraded brakes, a beautiful two-tone paint job, and custom interiors, showcasing the meticulous effort behind its construction.
Neutral: @melika61 (The Seller) provides detailed specifications of the Blazer, emphasizing the use of quality components and professional craftsmanship. Features include a crate LS3 engine, a custom suspension system, modern interior amenities, and advanced audio equipment. The vehicle's design integrates classic aesthetics with modern improvements, yielding both practical function and visual appeal. Various commenters, including @BigG5601 and @Ambrose15, ask insightful questions regarding specifics like the removable subwoofer, safety belts, and height, indicating a healthy interest in the vehicle's characteristics.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback, @AckMech humorously questions the authenticity of @melika61's claims about the removable top, implying it has never been taken off. Further, he inquires about the mismatched K/5 Blazer emblems, suggesting there might be inconsistencies in the build. These comments reflect a degree of skepticism among some users about the vehicle's details, hinting at possible concerns regarding the presentation or restoration process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 described the vehicle as a beautiful and rare 300SE, complimenting its exquisite color, interior, and wood details. @CharlieK911 noted the elegance of the automobile, emphasizing its handmade, durable metal construction and potential resilience compared to modern plastic vehicles. @BMcD viewed the car as a collectible investment that is currently undervalued in the auction, praising its attractive design and rarity.
Neutral: @racer355 (The Seller) introduced the 1967 Mercedes 300SE Coupe auction, inviting potential buyers for inspections, whether in person or virtually. The seller also mentioned that the vehicle would be presented without enhancements and explained the services offered, such as shipping quotes and ceramic coatings. @Frank_Barrett added that the vehicle has surprisingly good performance for its rarity, while @tlcamg expressed interest in seeing cold start and driving videos ahead of making a potential purchase.
Negative: @tlcamg requested further details on the car's condition, indicating a desire to know what might not be working. @racer355 (The Seller) responded somewhat defensively, questioning @tlcamg's sincerity as a potential buyer and suggesting that inquiries should have been made earlier given the auction's impending closing time. This exchange highlighted some tension in the comments, reflecting the seller's frustration with the timing of questions just before the auction's end.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Slam105 appreciates the attractive color combination of the vehicle, noting that the Torq-Thrusts with Red-Lines enhance its appearance. @BULLITT65 echoes the sentiment, complimenting the vehicle while further commenting on the California front plate enforcement. @Jake_Angel shares their excitement as an owner of a similar model, stating that the 'cool factor' of the car is exceptionally high, hoping it fetches a great price. Furthermore, @Oliver2711 finds the vehicle beautiful.
Neutral: @Slohotrod asks about the electric power assist steering, indicating an interest in the car's features. @muddymogriffin inquires about the original wheels and steering wheel, showing intent to learn more about what comes with the sale. @CBOERNER and @caregiver both ask about the authenticity of the steering wheel and the engine's original status. These comments demonstrate an engagement with the details and history of the vehicle but lack any strong opinions on its condition.
Negative: @Buddy2 raises concerns about the driver's door alignment, questioning if the car has been in an accident, but their comment received backlash for being non-constructive. They were also advised by @FunInTheSun not to overthink the factory imperfections of the fiberglass. Overall, there is some skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition, especially concerning its parts and alignment, which could imply potential issues that may affect bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Slam105 highlights the vehicle’s HEMI engine and jokingly suggests it should star in the next "Cars" movie, showing enthusiasm for its performance. @RichardPetty admires the car's appearance, noting its frog-like countenance is complemented by its green color, and appreciates its rich racing history. @morganplus8 celebrates it as a genuine race car, stating, 'Great car!' and @Tomme9 expresses excitement about the vehicle's remarkable provenance, indicating strong interest in following the auction closely.
Neutral: @grv (The Seller) engages with potential buyers, offering detailed specifications about the engine and build quality, explaining the various improvements made and parts used for optimal performance. They also provide updates about their participation in events such as Keels & Wheels, showcasing the car's status in the racing community. The seller responds to inquiries about the engine builder, mentioning Empson racing and Dick Read's contributions to its upkeep, maintaining transparency throughout the sale process.
Negative: Some comments on the vehicle's appearance have received mixed reactions, such as @Turbo-Z's critique regarding the number font, which they liken to Comic Sans, suggesting it might detract from the car's aesthetics. @Ranchero65 makes a humorous remark about the car's performance in relation to Ford tractors, hinting at the competitive spirit but also poking fun at its capabilities. @Italia_227 lightheartedly notes the car's vibe was similar to a fire hydrant mounted on its boot lid, implying a playful critical view of its design.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @davidv1007 expressed excitement about bidding on a unique Guards Red with an aero kit, indicating it might be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. @Mdh264 shared enthusiasm about their own glacier white 996 with the aerokit, appreciating the compliments they receive and predicting increasing prices for low mileage models like this one. @Aaammm complimented the stunning opening photo of the car, describing it as being on par with the artistry seen in 911R level photography, expressing confidence in the auction's success without the need for luck.
Neutral: @4byFreak (The Seller) provided comprehensive details about the vehicle, highlighting its low mileage of 37,000 and the peace of mind that comes with the replaced IMS bearing, and described it as one of the best looking and driving Porsches available for its price. The seller noted unique features such as a premium sound system installed at the dealer, affirming functionality of interior electronics and offering assistance with transportation and viewing arrangements. Other comments from @Toddsonofodin and @denvermw raised inquiries about service records and the specifics of the anniversary wheels, reflecting a general engagement with the listing.
Negative: @KINGOWOOD expressed frustration over a lack of response regarding arrangements to view the car in person, showing concern about communication from the seller. @Toddsonofodin's inquiry about service records indicated some skepticism about available maintenance history. The overall sentiment from some commenters showed a mix of curiosity and concern, demonstrating that while there is significant interest in the vehicle, issues regarding seller responsiveness and clarity on service details exist.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's beauty and condition, with @jasonhudnall calling it a "beauty" and @Calli74 noting it as "BEAUTIFUL". @BayAreaGolfer appreciated the immaculate condition of the Turbo S, highlighting the pride of ownership from the previous owner. Several commenters mentioned specifics they liked, such as the desirable color combination and the overall aesthetic appeal, with @BMWE90Guy stating it's his ideal specs and that a lucky person is getting this car.
Neutral: Some comments raised questions regarding the vehicle's specifications and history. @Calli74 inquired about the window sticker and additional options, while @jamestielsch asked about the transfer case issues and tire date codes. @4byFreak, the seller, provided detailed responses, stating there are no transfer case issues, and confirmed that the vehicle has a copy of the window sticker and shared the original build sheet totaling over $182,000.
Negative: There were concerns raised about potential issues with the vehicle. @waytoomanycarsshesays pointed out what appeared to be leakage in specific photos, prompting a clarification from @4byFreak that it was just water. @bc90210 asked if there were any safety recalls and if they had been addressed, while @joeybenz inquired about service records from an authorized Porsche dealer, indicating a desire for more documentation. Additionally, @TM850R expressed concern about the lack of a major service record and the original paint condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, describing it as gorgeous and one of the top replicas available, specifically mentioning the Kirkham as a competitor. The seller, @kwattsandco, is praised for their quick responses to questions about the car, including detailed explanations of the recent engine work, which cost $19,600. The proactive approach in addressing other commenters' inquiries about the car's history adds to the positive reception of the auction.
Neutral: Several inquiries focus on specifics regarding the vehicle's specifications and condition, such as requests for engine casting numbers, and clarification on the rear main seal leak issue. Others ask for images of various components, including the brass ERA tag and undercarriage photos. Comments about the Gatorade bottle, while humorous, also lead to discussions on its necessity, showing a mix of curiosity and lightheartedness about modifications made to the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the integrity of certain modifications, notably the use of a Gatorade bottle as an overflow reservoir, which some commenters perceive as a makeshift fix that could indicate deeper issues. @Hulk2000 emphasizes the need for proper engineering and part replacements instead of temporary solutions, reflecting skepticism towards the vehicle's repairs. Additionally, @BangersMash describes the nature of the engine repairs as painful and costly, indicating that while the work was done, it raises questions about the previous maintenance and overall reliability of the car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 1960 Volvo Duett P210, highlighting its beauty and uniqueness. @BluesDJ praised the car's excellent photo presentation, while @Frank_Barrett appreciated the philosophy of 'Dare to be Different' in the world of classic cars. Enthusiasts like @Misteref and @Dollycat3 referred to it as a stunning or beautiful example, with @2duett acknowledging the rarity of seeing such cars on the road. @MalamutAutoMuseum (The Seller) also shared a video showcasing the car's drive, contributing to positive sentiments about its performance.
Neutral: Some comments pointed out details and specifications surrounding the Volvo's model year, with @littledavid and @2duett noting discrepancies in the car's listing year and features, suggesting it might actually be a 1967 model rather than a 1960. @Morrisamazon noted that the steel wheels and hub caps were typical of Volvo models from the mid-60s. @littledavid provided insight regarding the vehicle's ID plate and production context, adding historical value to the discussion without expressing strong opinions about the car's desirability.
Negative: A few remarks raised concerns or questions about the vehicle. @LHarbourmaster inquired about signs of rust or repairs, while @Middler89 humorously questioned the ambition of the 120mph speedometer. @alaskossie wondered about the last P210 produced, suggesting the car might be nearing the end of its production line. Such comments reflect hesitations or critical scrutiny amid the overall fondness for the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Au_88 praises the 2013 LR4, calling it one of the best SUVs ever made, highlighting its impressive performance despite an interest in a different model. @snelson203 expresses his satisfaction with his 2013 LR4, noting its great condition and wishing success to the seller. @Turbo-Z shares positive insights about their previous experiences with the LR4, noting its powerful V8 engine, overall reliability with proper maintenance, and particularly mentions the excellent braking system, determining it as one of the best Land Rovers made.
Neutral: @michaelmotorcar, the seller, provides detailed information about the 2012 LR4, including its history, service records, and appearance, while inviting potential bidders to view the vehicle at their showroom. Commenters question some specifics, like @rusty_325 inquiring about the timing chain replacements, and @Gold57 pointing out a potential issue with the vehicle's described color. @polopolo mentions having had a similar model that was reliable, suggesting the high quality of the vehicle overall despite moving on for a newer model.
Negative: @Nolift911 addresses some concerns about maintenance, detailing potential expenses regarding timing chains and other components, indicating that while these trucks are great, they do require regular upkeep. @Prayarga raises a critical issue about an open recall from 2021 related to a gas tank flaw, expressing concern over its unresolved status. Overall, while the vehicle garners praise, there are underlying maintenance concerns and recalls that potential buyers should consider.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics describes the 1997 SL500 as a gorgeous example returning to auction after a previous bidder failed to follow through. They emphasize their expertise as a high-volume dealership specializing in unique vehicles from private sellers, highlighting their commitment to smooth transactions, citing a strong reputation with hundreds of 5-star Google Reviews. The seller also offers transparency with potential buyers, welcoming inspections and providing logistical support such as shipping and storage.
Neutral: Commenters like @Showcase78 express admiration for the car's beauty, mentioning its one-owner history and extensive service records. However, questions arise about specific details such as the conditions of the hydraulic cylinders and the replacement of the antenna, as both @PeteyV and @TAH_Tiger raise inquiries about the car's features and maintenance history. Despite some concerns about minor imperfections, there is a general sense of intrigue about the vehicle's overall quality and performance.
Negative: There are significant concerns regarding potential water damage as raised by several commenters including @ram_g and @leftlane11, citing visible stains in multiple areas of the vehicle. @PeteyV speculates that the prior bidder may have ghosted due to these issues, while @Collectibleclassics assures that the vehicle was never submerged and acknowledges only minor staining from normal use. The seller also expresses frustration with the previous bidder’s lack of respect, reinforcing confidence in the car's condition but leaving some doubts lingering among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments on its stunning condition and beautiful color combination, notably the Carbon Black exterior paired with Imola red leather. Commenters such as @maw06 praised its aesthetic appeal, along with @TM749 (The Seller) who revealed that the car comes with a clean CARFAX, 16 service records, and has been well-maintained under long-term Southern ownership. Additionally, the car has had many important factory updates performed, ensuring it operates smoothly with no current issues reported. The seller also highlights their willingness to provide additional information and maintain transparency, which is positively received by potential bidders.
Neutral: There were inquiries regarding the performance of certain vehicle components, including the 'big 3' maintenance tasks and whether the VANOS system has been replaced. @Zen_e46m3 clarified that for the 2006 LCI model, two of the issues are already addressed at the factory, which was confirmed by @TM749 (The Seller). Though @lospice1 posed a relevant question regarding the big three, the majority of comments discussed the car's condition without serious concerns. Overall, the inquiries reflect a general curiosity about the vehicle's past maintenance and its readiness for being driven without immediate repairs.
Negative: Some negative comments addressed minor issues such as the need for replacing the front passenger side sway bar link, which @maw06 pointed out, raising some concern over the vehicle's maintenance. Additionally, @nrnjr brought attention to potential interior issues, questioning the state of the soft top and whether there are any tears in the fabric. Despite the overall favorable reception, these concerns about parts that may need service drew attention and reflect a need for potential buyers to be cautious about hidden costs associated with repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @CometGirl427 expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it beautiful, while @WAGONBOYTD noted the D90 has a decent full MOT despite its mileage, suggesting it is well-maintained. @tdi90, the current owner, shared that they had a positive experience with the car over the past three years, highlighting recent replacements and that it has been reliable for trips without issues. The comments from the former owner also added a positive note, stating that the truck drives excellently and is in great condition after significant updates during their ownership.
Neutral: @actonautoboutique (The Seller) provided details about the vehicle, mentioning that it was imported from England in 2020 and has been thrown into auction on Bring a Trailer. They welcomed questions about the vehicle and informed @Darren04 that it was registered in Massachusetts. The seller indicated there is no AC in the vehicle when addressed by @chip388 and confirmed to @Jariztmendy that there is no tire rubbing as far as they are aware. They also stated that the canvas top could be removed in about 15 minutes, responding to @Jafer's inquiries about it.
Negative: Some comments hint at concerns or information gaps. @Jafer inquired about the specifics of the engine swap and whether the seller could provide more details. Additionally, @chip388 asked about the presence of A/C, which was confirmed as absent by the seller. While the seller communicated positively about the vehicle, the lack of certain information might raise questions for potential buyers. @tdi90 conveyed some regret about selling the vehicle, indicating a necessity beyond preference, which could suggest potential buyers might be observing a reluctance to part with it.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors appreciated the thorough explanations and details provided by @MTXaudio regarding the vehicle's features and previous issues. For instance, @MTXaudio addressed concerns about the trunk and provided clarity on the condition of the vehicle by sharing before and after photos of repairs, which seemed to reassure potential buyers. This transparency about the repairs enhanced confidence in the vehicle's condition and management.
Neutral: Several questions were raised by @belvinollc which showed a genuine interest in understanding the vehicle's specifics, such as the Active Fuel Management system and whether the car had a flip key. @MTXaudio responded clearly, confirming that the car is factory equipped with the AFM and does not have a flip key, making sure to provide accurate information that could assist prospects in making informed decisions.
Negative: Some concerns were expressed, particularly about the battery's placement in the trunk and the potential issues with the key fob functionality. @belvinollc pointed out the possibility of a wire kink and asked for confirmation on the interior trunk release's reliability, highlighting worries that could arise from the car's design. While @MTXaudio provided answers, the inquiries reflected underlying doubts about the vehicle's functionality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments praising the 1993 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra R highlight its status as a 'fantastic time capsule' and an 'undisputed king of the Fox body Mustangs.' Commentors like @p1_motorcars_ltd and @Voodoorgv express excitement about the car's pristine condition and upcoming auction, with @p1_motorcars_ltd noting the great documentation that comes with it. Enthusiasts also admire its design and driving philosophy, with @TomLU86 celebrating the absence of distractions like A/C and stereo, making it a pure driving experience. @AJL1988 reminisces about the beauty and rarity of such vehicles, contributing to the overall positive sentiment around its collectible value.
Neutral: Some users engage in discussions about technical aspects of the vehicle, such as the power ratings and historical context behind its production numbers. For instance, @Slinkert raises questions about the horsepower spec being a bit low compared to earlier models and engages in a technical debate about changes in Ford's rating methods. @PP0001 and @specracer46 clarify the circumstances around its limited production run, which was influenced by a lawsuit that led to an unexpected increase in units from the original plan. These neutral comments reflect a blend of nostalgia and factual discussions that inform potential buyers without swaying their opinions significantly.
Negative: Conversely, some comments exhibit skepticism about the practicality of owning such a low-mileage vehicle. @Lobek argues that the car's value might lead to it being treated merely as an artifact rather than a drivable car, describing it as a 'coaster' for enthusiasts who prefer to enjoy their vehicles. @Flowride compares the situation to collectors who hoard expensive guitars, lamenting the lack of use and enjoyment of the car. Similarly, @nobrakes discusses the potential investment return if the funds were placed in stocks instead, implying that while the car may appreciate in value, it lacks the joy of being driven. Overall, these comments highlight concerns about the implications of owning a vehicle that is too valuable to risk on the road.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @bill930p describes the vehicle as a beautiful example of the 997.2 model that looks even better in person. He highlights that the vehicle is likely ceramic coated and mentions the rising market value of these cars, encouraging buyers to make a purchase while they are still affordable. @Reg99 shares their own positive experience owning a similar model, noting the rarity of manual coupes and expressing satisfaction with their purchase, wishing good luck to the seller.
Neutral: @JoeKai and @Policyquants inquire about the vehicle's title status, with @JoeKai specifically asking if the duplicate title affects ownership in Florida. The seller clarifies that a duplicate title indicates the original was lost but does not affect ownership rights. Additionally, @Gamecock1992 points out the car's history per Carfax, mentioning the various registrations and asking for more information regarding its service and history, which the seller addresses in detail.
Negative: @Gamecock1992 raises concerns about the paint quality, suggesting some areas appear repainted, which leads to questions about the car's accident history. @JoeKai also notes what seems to be a squeak in the drive video, concerned about potential suspension noise, which the seller tries to clarify. The seller assures that the car's condition is excellent and attributes any noises in the video to external factors, responding to buyers' concerns about the car's integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ArtistFox expressed a strong affection for the body style of the Escalade EXT, indicating a positive overall impression of the aesthetics of the vehicle. Additionally, @beinerce (The Seller) highlighted the vehicle's well-maintained history, verified by multiple sources, responding positively to inquiries about its running condition by assuring that it runs and drives great and actively engaging with potential buyers.
Neutral: The comments included various inquiries from potential buyers, including @dmag1957 who asked about driving mode and whether there would be any videos showcasing the vehicle in action. @beinerce (The Seller) responded by confirming that videos would be available and engaging with the questions posed, showing a willingness to provide information to interested parties.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly about the wear on the seats after only 48,000 miles, as noted by @83HURST. @beinerce (The Seller) addressed this by emphasizing their lack of familiarity with the previous owner's habits and suggested that if @83HURST was not comfortable with the vehicle's condition, it might be best to consider other options. Additionally, @AutoOverload pointed out the issue of potential buyers initially bidding on the vehicle but not following through with purchases, which reflects negatively on the buying process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Calstickshift praises the vehicle for its impressive 9-band graphic equalizer, emphasizing the peak audio quality it offers. @jwcunningham65 describes it as a beautiful mid-80s time machine, capturing the nostalgia associated with classic models. Additionally, @DDietrich fondly reminisces about a similar model his late father owned, emphasizing the beauty of the car and connecting it to personal memories.
Neutral: @gaijinshogun (The Seller) welcomes participants to the auction of the 1985 Celica GT, noting its overall good condition and historic significance. The seller mentions spending $2,500 for necessary repairs and servicing, including A/C and exhaust work, and highlights the car's upgraded coilover suspension for enhanced ride quality. They also refer to the factory brochure, which details the car's features, and the unique history of the engine used in the model.
Negative: @GMWBlaster raises a concern regarding the lack of maintenance documentation despite the car having only 47K miles, which could be a potential red flag for interested buyers. @Cannon67 inquires about the car's handling on the highway, suggesting a need for reassurance on its driving performance. @drriddle comments on the absence of independent rear suspension in the GT model, which may impact the driving experience compared to other models, pointing out a difference that some may find disappointing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle. @JAY-Z highlighted the extensive work and investment involved in the rebuild, particularly noting the improvements to the powertrain and suspension, indicating that the car is ready for action. @GLWTA,RPOLS5 praised the 1968 model for its impressive appearance and stance, while @daericks appreciated the great photography showcasing the vehicle's features. @thatclassiccarguy22 complimented the careful construction and detailing of the car, suggesting that the eventual buyer will be very pleased with their purchase.
Neutral: The conversation also included inquiries and clarifications. @Beatlesfreak asked about the vehicle's title status and the specifics of the body repairs. In response, @missmyF4302023 confirmed that the car has a clean title in Arizona and that any body repairs had been performed by the previous owner in British Columbia, although she did not possess documentation for those repairs. @Mownhoj expressed curiosity about the paint color, which @missmyF4302023 later identified as San Marino Bleu Metallic from Porsche, offering the paint code for interested buyers.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns or curiosity. @Beatlesfreak's question about the title status implied a concern regarding the vehicle's history, while @Mownhoj's request for the paint code suggested a desire for more details about the car's specifications. However, there were no strongly negative comments or complaints about the vehicle itself.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @RangersFan (The Seller) shares several positive features of the vehicle, stating that it is equipped with an Electric Fuel Injection system and has a 350 Chevy Crate Engine, which makes it low maintenance and easily serviceable. The transmission is a H55 5-speed from a fj74, providing a smooth and highway-friendly driving experience. Additionally, the new rims and tires significantly enhance ride quality, making it a great choice for everyday driving. @RangersFan (The Seller) also highlights the cleanliness of the car with provided pictures under the mats.
Neutral: The comments from @Ateamal11, @ColoArcherJeff, @ducttape, and @Waccabuc seek clarification on various aspects of the vehicle. @Ateamal11 inquires whether the vehicle has an EFI or carburetor system, while @ColoArcherJeff asks for information about the installed transmission. @ducttape requests photographs of the floors, suggesting a concern for the vehicle's condition, and @Waccabuc is interested in seeing pictures of the car with the top removed, indicating curiosity about its versatility and appearance.
Negative: @drejeep raises a concern regarding potential rust, asking if there are any signs of rust bubbling in the paint or on the body panels and seams of the doors. This inquiry points to a potential issue with the vehicle's body condition, which may be a concern for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ChrisKennedy (The Seller) expressed excitement about the rewarding experience of rebuilding the vehicle and welcomed questions from potential buyers, demonstrating enthusiasm for the project. @JLsKA510 complimented the restoration of the vehicle, indicating that it was appealing enough to consider bidding if geographically closer. @boaboyoz described the vehicle as a "beautiful blue C10" and praised the build quality, reflecting a positive reception from those who appreciate its aesthetics.
Neutral: Inquiries were made about specific features and functionalities of the vehicle, such as whether it was a short box, the operation of the heater, and whether the exhaust stopped in front of the rear axle. @T7190 confirmed with @ChrisKennedy (The Seller) that it is indeed a short bed. Additionally, @StevenSullivan54 sought details on the functionality of the horn, e-brake, blinkers, and lights, receiving assurances from @ChrisKennedy that all lights and the updated heat and air systems work well, thanks to the vintage air kit.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's mechanical aspects. @StevenSullivan54 reported that the horn was not functioning, and further sought confirmation on whether the AC blew cold air and details about the rear end's specifications, questioning if it was a positraction or not. @ChrisKennedy (The Seller) admitted to lacking details about the engine block, indicating that the seller may not have all the information potential buyers are looking for.
![]() |
324-Powered 1950 Oldsmobile Futuramic Series 98 2-Door Deluxe Club Sedan
509L6079
Lot 218995
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @JLsKA510 commented on the vehicle, describing it as "Absolutely stunning!" @Dollycat3 praised the car as an "Absolutely fabulous Futuramic Series 98 two-door" with extraordinary upgrades and beauty. @RocknRoll found the car gorgeous and complimented the write-up and photos, while also showing curiosity about the vehicle's handling and air conditioning performance. @Hoppy18 humorously expressed his admiration, noting that the Futuramic is outstanding and had a clever exchange with his wife about its purchase, indicating a lighthearted appreciation of the car.
Neutral: @Middler89 complimented the car's appearance but expressed frustration about its presentation, questioning why the photos were taken without cleaning the vehicle first. @ButWhatDoIKnow asked about the vehicle's power steering type, showing interest without expressing strong opinions. The Seller, @tompwilson, responded positively to all comments and provided essential information about the car, addressing issues like the A/C and the fuel pump, and explaining his reasons for not driving the vehicle often to preserve its condition.
Negative: @Middler89 also mentioned the significant shipping cost through BaT, expressing that $3,110 to ship the car to Wisconsin felt unreasonable. @OldsBear raised concerns about the vehicle's roadworthiness, particularly regarding the fuel pump and its functionality. @Frank1951 and @aaron72 suggested there could be a knocking sound in the engine, raising alarms about potential mechanical issues, which @tompwilson addressed by denying any engine knock, suggesting that the noise was related to a construction issue rather than the vehicle's performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @wem5310 expressed enthusiasm for the Z1, sharing their experience of seeing one at a car show, highlighting its rarity and special nature. @Talksteer reminisced about their time with a Z1, noting its interesting drive and enjoyment, despite not being fast by modern standards. @kevinorme mentioned a preference for the Z1 over other BMW 'z' models, signaling appreciation for its unique characteristics, despite its perceived smaller size and slower performance.
Neutral: Comments regarding the Z1's speedometer indicate it varies between models, with @Mark.Blessing noting theirs is in km/h, while @HankLloydRight pointed out that only UK imports featured an MPH speedometer. @ZFirst1 elaborated on the rarity of the mph speedometer in Z1s, explaining the influence of geography on market values due to varying imports. @Charles_Ramsey (The Seller) ensured potential buyers that comprehensive videos of the vehicle's features, including operations of the doors and driving conditions, would be provided if requested.
Negative: However, @nsxnick and @QuarterHorses conveyed disappointment regarding the vehicle's location in the UK, suggesting a longing for availability in the US market. Concerns about the preservation of the plastic body panels were raised by @Talksteer, questioning the impact of extreme weather conditions during storage in the US. @nylasurf sought assurance regarding video demonstrations of the car's functionality before the auction ended, indicating a desire for more reassurance about the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Calstickshift reminisced fondly about owning a similar 1970 model in the same colors, describing it as a glorious car. @wwilme referred to the vehicle as '19 feet of pure beauty', sharing a personal anecdote about their own 1970 model that they never restored. @FunInTheSun shared a humorous story about their enjoyable experiences driving a classic Cadillac, describing it as a big, slow, and super fun car to have with friends.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed interest in specific details about the car. @DocMGL raised questions about potential bubbles, chrome condition, and the operational status of the speedometer and other gauges. @EZEdChicago (The Seller) confirmed that the air conditioning is inoperative and not hooked up, while @Msasteel inquired about the discrepancy regarding the vehicle's grille in relation to its VIN. Furthermore, @Thorcen asked about the reason behind the assigned VIN, while @LeonVaughan noted that it seems like the grille was replaced at some point, prompting speculation about the car's history.
Negative: Concerns were expressed regarding the overall condition of the vehicle, particularly its bumpers and alignment. @CarFoolLane criticized the absence of the fender skirts, suggesting that a Cadillac without them looks incomplete, while @Signguy61 raised questions regarding potential damage that could have caused misalignments in the trunk and bumper areas. Furthermore, @aog88 mentioned that the steering wheel appeared skewed, raising doubts about the vehicle's alignment, and @wood1565 requested more information on potential damage under the steering cover.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Mattbuckley14 shared the story of their vintage camper, describing it as beautifully restored with modern updates while maintaining its original 70s charm. The camper has been well-maintained in their backyard and comes with additional flooring and cover. @Dollycat3 praised the camper's beautiful finishes and layout, calling it a wonderful space for relaxation, while @HeavyTank77 recalled fond memories from owning a similar vintage model, implying a strong market interest in such campers.
Neutral: @FunInTheSun inquired about the camper's location and joked about renting it out, reflecting a light-hearted interest. Commenters like @poetkirk and @Ntown615 raised practical questions regarding towing and the condition of components like tires, hitch, and lights, showing a focus on the camper's usability. @BMWsteve sought clarification on the camper's electricity capabilities and sanitation systems, indicating a standard set of concerns for potential buyers.
Negative: @V-Faux cautioned that the tires appeared dry-rotted based on one of the pictures, suggesting a potential safety issue. @olddatsun12 asked about water leakage, rewiring, and checked functionality, highlighting concerns about the trailer's readiness for long trips. Lastly, @ceeul8r pointed out the absence of propane tanks, raising questions about power supply and refrigerator function at non-electric campsites, which could pose limitations for some users.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 expressed enthusiasm for the Chevrolet Impala convertible, enjoying its rarity and overall appeal. @jrcrawford4 shared fond memories of wanting a convertible version of his first car, indicating a strong sentimental value for this model. @JohnF1966 commented on the car being a solid project, praising its rust-free condition and suggesting it has great potential once the mechanicals are sorted out.
Neutral: Comments from @39mercman noted a discrepancy regarding the steering wheel description, while @Classy63Chassis raised concerns about the transmission type, leading to clarifications from the seller regarding a two-speed automatic transmission. @Regency (The Seller) addressed several inquiries about the car's grille badge, trim tag, and past repairs, showing willingness to engage with potential buyers. @bringatrailer updated the listing with the correct transmission details after receiving feedback.
Negative: @Supernatural67 expressed concerns about the car's functionality, asking if the top and windows worked properly and inquiring about mechanical issues. @knucklehead_61 questioned the car's roadworthiness for a long trip, to which the seller advised against attempting to drive it without further professional work. Additionally, @bagwellk's comments about a mistaken bid reflected anxiety about potential repercussions, highlighting uncertainties in the bidding process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle for its beauty and craftsmanship. @Dollycat3 described it as an 'absolutely superb Super Eight Victoria Convertible Coupe' with a beautiful color and stunning interior. @Slam105 agreed, calling it a beauty that should lead a Fourth of July parade. @boaboyoz referred to the car as 'thoroughly exquisite' and an excellent example, while @Bordeaux expressed that it is the most beautiful car of the post-war era, deserving of honor and preservation.
Neutral: The seller, @bfr812, provided clarification on the vehicle's specifications and maintenance, indicating that the vehicle runs on a 6-volt system despite using two 6-volt batteries in series. They also mentioned that the roof's hydraulic mechanism and essential electrical components are functioning correctly after recent repairs. Various commenters, including @Roger2851 and @Mickey421, asked specific questions about the car's functionality, including the roof operation and any signs of rust or repairs, to which the seller responded promptly.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the vehicle's condition. @cyclemikey pointed out that calling the system 'still 6-volt' was misleading because connecting two 6-volt batteries in series would convert it to 12-volts. @Mickey421 noted that the underside of the car appeared a bit 'crusty' and inquired about any evidence of prior rust repairs. @Gordoninttexas and others also pressed for details about the overdrive functionality, paint issues, and whether the vehicle could be driven over long distances, suggesting a level of skepticism regarding the seller's assurances about the car's condition.
![]() |
Original-Owner 2017 Ford Mustang GT Coupe Roush Stage 3 6-Speed
1FA6P8CF2H5211211
Lot 218999
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @msherill expresses a strong admiration for the vehicle, questioning why @jalandis75 (The Seller) is letting it go. They speculate that the sale might be due to the purchase of a new GTD and mention a desire for the car to go to North Carolina.
Neutral: @jalandis75 (The Seller) clarifies that the vehicle was never used on a racetrack and confirms it is CARB compliant with a horsepower of 670. They mention that they bought the car as a retirement gift after a memorable drive home from North Carolina. @ebboyd inquires about the battery cover piece and a potential issue with the Roush valence/ground effects kit, prompting @jalandis75 to communicate that they would check on these concerns after confirming they have a battery cover but had not reattached it.
Negative: @ebboyd raises concerns about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the missing battery cover and the appearance of a gap in the rear Roush valence, asking if it is broken or damaged. This inquiry suggests potential issues with the vehicle that may concern prospective buyers, contrasting with the positive aspects highlighted by other commenters.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have praised the Bronco for its solid driver-quality build and eye-catching appearance. @HanerHausVintageWorks highlighted that this classic vehicle often turns heads, while @boaboyoz described it as 'cool as a cucumber' and a 'beautiful build'. Users like @gtabert and @lvmorrison have also expressed their appreciation for the vehicle's clean interior and reliable features such as electronic ignition and fuel injection, enhancing the overall driving experience.
Neutral: There were some inquiries about specific details related to the Bronco. @gtabert asked about the presence of electronic ignition, which @HanerHausVintageWorks confirmed it has. @lvmorrison questioned the absence of seatbelts and a spare tire, noting that while there are no seatbelts installed, the mounting points are available for those who want to add them. Furthermore, @Todd_Z. inquired about the suspension modifications, providing an insightful discussion on its components that were made by a previous owner, while @HanerHausVintageWorks clarified that some suspension work predates his ownership.
Negative: Some comments addressed minor concerns with the vehicle's features. @HanerHausVintageWorks acknowledged that the doors could close smoother and mentioned alignment issues with the power windows. Additionally, he remarked on typical play in the shifter and steering, noting these are common aspects for vintage Bronco models. Overall, while no major red flags were raised, there were suggestions for improvement that enthusiasts might consider if looking to refine the vehicle further.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the classic Cadillac Eldorado Biarritz convertible, highlighting its lovely appearance and elegant color combination. @Dollycat3 described it as 'absolutely superb' and 'absolutely exceptional,' while @Hoppy18 echoed this sentiment, marveling at the idea of driving the stunning vehicle. @Tasmaniandevil noted the vehicle's full restoration and quality refurbishment, adding to the overall appreciation of the car's condition and aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: In a discussion about the dealership's collection, @HyannisHonda (The Seller) explained that they maintain around 45 classic cars, which they sell to make room for new inventory, enhancing the context for why this particular vehicle is available. @Bj123 expressed curiosity about the dealership's history with classic cars and showed interest in following their inventory closely, while @DocMGL inquired about the originality of the dash, seeking clarity on any restorations.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about specific elements of the vehicle. @CORVAIRWILD criticized the use of cheap seatbelts in classic cars, suggesting that while they may be functional, their aesthetic detracts from the overall quality. Additionally, @Jay1960 argued that while the car itself is excellent, they claimed that Coker radials are inferior compared to Diamond Back tires, implying that not all aftermarket components meet high standards.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The seller, @aegmotorsports, has provided an extensive introduction to the auction of a 2015 Audi Q7, highlighting its impressive features and low mileage of 46k miles. They emphasize the vehicle's luxurious amenities, including a powerful 3.0L supercharged V6 engine, Quattro all-wheel drive, and premium features like a 14-speaker Bose sound system and a power glass panoramic roof. Additionally, the seller is proactive in communicating with potential buyers, encouraging direct contact for shipping quotes and offering the option for extended warranty plans.
Neutral: Comments from buyers seeking information, such as @cpicorp1 inquiring about enclosed shipping costs, indicate interest in the vehicle but may also reflect typical pre-purchase queries. The seller promptly responds to shipping inquiries and highlights the vehicle's value as a No Reserve auction, inviting questions and offering pre-purchase inspection options. This communication demonstrates a willingness to engage with prospective buyers and clarify the vehicle's offerings.
Negative: Despite the positive attention, there are concerns raised by @JeffR952, who advises caution due to past experiences with misleading representations of cars from @aegmotorsports. They claim that the photos did not accurately depict the vehicle's condition and report bad service when addressing issues after the purchase. The seller counters these claims by assuring that all vehicle wear was documented in the auction photos, suggesting a conflict in perceptions that could potentially deter future buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its low mileage and excellent condition. @BBK referred to it as a 'unicorn' due to its rarity, mentioning the elegant and timeless styling of the E38 series. @dhsnook and @Dark-Cloud also shared their appreciation for the car's beauty, noting how it would be a regrettable decision to drive such a pristine automobile too often. Additionally, @Cirebid acknowledged the vehicle as a 'hidden treasure,' further reinforcing its desirability.
Neutral: The comments included inquiries and clarifications about the vehicle's specifications and maintenance. @Jonfrancis asked about the A/C type, which @jimbear (The Seller) confirmed is R-134A. @Bidplacer raised a concern about the condition of the door seals and sought advice on potential fixes, to which @jimbear responded with detailed information on the issue and suggested replacement parts. Overall, there were informative exchanges regarding the car's upkeep and features, contributing to a broader understanding of the vehicle's condition.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding the practicality of owning such a well-preserved vehicle. @gweaver noted the guilt associated with driving high-value cars, recalling their own experience of having sold a perfect E38 due to the pressure of maintaining its condition. This sentiment was echoed by others who expressed hesitance about using a car in such mint condition for everyday driving, suggesting that while the vehicle is indeed desirable, potential buyers may feel conflicted about its usability versus its collector's appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ttocs6991 (The Seller) describes the Dark Emerald Pearl 80 Series Land Cruiser as a beautiful vehicle that runs and drives great with only 153k miles. The interior has been upgraded with a new head unit and speakers, and all electrical features including windows, sunroof, and power antenna are functional. The seller emphasizes that the car has a clean Carfax and has undergone a full paint correction to restore its shine, illustrating the care taken in maintaining the vehicle.
Neutral: Commenters such as @Thatsagreatride and @Ramco express admiration for the Land Cruiser's appearance, with @Ramco asking for more pictures of the undercarriage and frame, showing interest in its structural condition. @JustMe1 raises a question about any known water intrusion issues, which @ttocs6991 promptly clarifies by stating there are no signs of leaks and confirms that the frame is clean with only minor surface rust.
Negative: A notable issue highlighted by @ttocs6991 (The Seller) is that the driver’s seat controls are non-operational, which was acknowledged by @bringatrailer in their comment. Although the seller expresses confidence in the vehicle's overall condition, the mention of non-working parts may affect potential buyers' perceptions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @tim54575 (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm about the vehicle, welcoming potential buyers and thanking those who place bids. The car is described as being in superb running condition despite having been stored for a few months. Additionally, @tim54575 emphasizes that the car, a special 'Fourintune example,' looks and drives excellently while acknowledging it is not perfect but slightly modified, which is seen positively. @Starboardtrimmer appreciates the steering wheel, noting it is fitting for a BJ8, suggesting it aligns well with the vehicle's character.
Neutral: Comments from @morganplus8 highlight that the car has been restored to a nice standard and retains its original colors. However, they express a personal dislike for the front wing vents, which they believe detract from the car's originality despite acknowledging that such modifications were used in rally cars. @tim54575 responds to this by mentioning that the vents are subjective and can effectively help with heat dissipation in street cars, indicating a balanced view on modifications versus originality.
Negative: @TexasMule raises a concern about the vehicle having to be towed for its final oil change, suggesting potential issues with reliability or maintenance history. While @tim54575 offers reassurance about the car's superb performance, the raised question indicates a lingering doubt from potential buyers regarding its past care. Additionally, @jcoxeter1 inquires about a specific picture, demonstrating that there may be some ambiguity or lack of clarity regarding the vehicle's details.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @retrozen shared nostalgia about their 1957 190SL and remarked on the car's striking appearance currently for sale, emphasizing how nice it looks. @UncleFred1 praised the unique color combination of white with black leather and the appealing whitewall tires, suggesting that a functions video would be beneficial. Additionally, @WAGroup (The Seller) described the vehicle as one of the nicest 190SL cars they've had, noting its strong mechanical condition, new parts, such as tires and a starter, and the absence of corrosion, further enhancing the vehicle's appeal. They ensured buyers that the car is ready to drive and enjoy immediately.
Neutral: Several comments inquired about the car's history and specifications, including commentors @TheChamberlain and @Mhgt40, who asked for maintenance records and a data card. @Gtate4200 requested confirmation of whether the car was originally painted white, while @Mentor10 brought up the possibility of the car color being 'Alabaster White.' @Kotsg also requested a picture of the hardtop to assess the vehicle. These inquiries suggest a general interest in the car's authenticity and condition but do not convey strong enthusiasm or disappointment.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding the car's body mounts expressed by @UncleFred1, who pointed out they appeared to have some dry-rot, although the seller assured it’s easy to replace. @retrozen hinted at skepticism regarding the speed of the sale, questioning why it was being sold soon after a previous listing. Additionally, some comments from @Boulderman and @Hoppy18 pointed out the confusion regarding the car’s auction history, implying there may be a lack of clarity about its condition and the urgency of the sale.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @NaplesLuxuryCars (The Seller) has provided a comprehensive overview of the BMW M3 Competition, emphasizing its remarkable condition and meticulous management. The seller highlights that the car is a one-owner vehicle from a high-level business owner in Naples, kept in climate-controlled storage. New Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tires have been added, and the seller is open to questions, showcasing a willingness to assist during the auction period. There are assurances that all documentation and videos will be provided, reiterating the car's pristine nature and the level of care it has received.
Neutral: Commenters have raised questions seeking clarity on the vehicle's condition and history. For instance, @TalonTSi702 and @E86_nerd inquire about the minor damage mentioned in the listing, asking for images and details. Additionally, @Qvsim and @yknot327 are curious about any modifications that may have been made to the car, while @Spurs1321 asks about the status of the BMW factory warranty. The overall exchange reflects a mix of admiration for the car's quality along with queries that suggest a desire for further information before making a bidding decision.
Negative: Certain comments indicate concerns regarding the representation of the vehicle's features, particularly about inaccurate details such as the crankshaft material. @675MIZU noted a mix-up with 'forged aluminum' when addressing the crankshaft, prompting @E86_nerd to clarify the need for correction. @TalonTSi702 expressed frustration with the visibility of the damage due to poor filming conditions, while @ns535i appears uncertain about the auction's reserve price based on pre-owned market evaluations, hinting at apprehension regarding the fair market value of the car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous comments express admiration for the 2014 Jaguar XKR-S GT, emphasizing its rarity and performance. @CChiusolo notes that these vehicles will be a hot commodity in the future, indicating high demand. @USMMA refers to it as the 'Holy Grail of XKR-S', while @grahamp130 highlights the limited production numbers, stating that the GT variant is very rare. @JUMPMASTER adds that they consider the car a collector's gem, reflecting on their own positive experience with a similar vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters provide neutral observations regarding the vehicle's aesthetics and performance features. @john4surf mentions a preference for the performance of the GT version yet notes a drawback with the rear wing affecting visibility. @ColoradoGuy1 adds that while it's cool, a different badge might be more appealing after Jaguar's rebrand. @Pastaman1962 raises questions about the specific performance enhancements of the GT package, asking for more information which reflects genuine interest without explicit judgment.
Negative: A few comments reflect some criticisms about the design, particularly concerning the large rear wing. @Pubecanoe expresses that the wing ruins the car's lines, while @LuvBritCars shares a similar sentiment but acknowledges the car's beauty otherwise. @mdlazar finds the wing 'profoundly awful' but admits its functional purpose. Additionally, @Pastaman1962 questions whether the high cost of the GT package is justified by the performance enhancements, suggesting skepticism about its value relative to more conventional options.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 1977 Ferrari 400 GT, recognizing it as a stunning vehicle with classic aesthetics and a strong heritage. @Jaredsalinsky lauded the black over tan color combination and noted the impressive history of maintenance for the car, while @TRibute emphasized that the vehicle retained its original European profile, contributing to its beauty and appeal. @Read33 echoed this sentiment, appreciating the car's analog nature compared to modern vehicles and wishing they could justify a purchase. Overall, the positive remarks highlighted the car's desirability, classic design, and well-maintained condition.
Neutral: The seller, @AutomotiveRestorations, provided extensive background information, including details about their business and the auction process. They are open to inquiries and have made arrangements for viewings and secure transport for the auction winner. Comments regarding the vehicle's specifications were addressed appropriately, such as correcting the model clarification from 400i to 400GT and providing pictures of the car's features, including the toolkit and paint readings. This approach ensured that potential buyers had ample information regarding the car's condition and history.
Negative: However, there were some concerns raised by commenters regarding specific aspects of the car. @MikeinTN pointed out that the driver's side headlight appeared dim, prompting a response from the seller about replacing the headlight before the auction concluded. Additionally, @eurocol inquired about the functionality of the rear suspension, seeking reassurance about the car's operational condition in response to earlier comments about shock replacements. These issues reflect a desire for additional clarity on the car's current functionality and performance.
![]() |
5.7L-Powered 1981 GMC Vandura 2500 Starcraft Conversion Van
2GTEG25H8B4513272
Lot 219011
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed a fondness for the van's condition and features, with @Ryana9754 (The Seller) sharing a personal anecdote about a pleasant road trip, indicating that the vehicle drives well and all systems function correctly. @cdwatnsu appreciated the practical design detail of the floormat cutout for the high beams, while @TNGuy described the aesthetic appeal of the van's interior, highlighting its distinctive red velour. Additionally, @wood1565 noted the van's appealing vintage charm and sought reassurance about the steering wheel's stability, further underscoring the overall positive perception of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters posed practical inquiries about the vehicle's condition and operational capacity. @TonyBosworth questioned the functioning of essential systems like air conditioning and cruise control, while @ketch347 inquired about the overall reliability of the van for long trips, specifically asking about the engine, gearbox, and cooling system. @Matyala asked @Ryana9754 (The Seller) for a running engine video, indicating a desire for more evidence of its performance without implying any particular concerns or praises.
Negative: Some comments highlighted potential issues with the van. @brucebullitt's initial positive impression soured upon seeing the interior, and @SmileyFace raised concerns about possible damage to the left rear barn door hinge, questioning its functionality and the potential for rust accumulation. @Paul_Dietzel's comment also reflected skepticism regarding the cosmetic aspects of the van, suggesting that the threshold plates might be hiding underlying problems, which could deter potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its history as a "single family owned" car and appreciating its mostly original condition. @sgntpepper78 highlighted the importance of this aspect in the listing, suggesting it would attract potential buyers. @camarolynn reminisced about similar classic cars, emphasizing that this model provides a great entry point into the classic car market without significant expense, which could appeal to enthusiasts at local car events. Additionally, @Mjboro (The Seller) provided insights into the vehicle's origins and maintenance, affirming its solid floors and inclusion of original California license plates, enhancing its value.
Neutral: Several participants raised questions about specific features and details of the vehicle, such as @E.L.Cord's inquiry about the defroster and @donnitd's clarification regarding the heater options. @Mjboro (The Seller) confirmed that the incorrect "V" emblem was due to a previous repaint, which sparked discussions about the car's original configurations. The conversation also touched on the car's minor updates, such as the stereo installation. @bringatrailer made a correction regarding the wheel size, reflecting ongoing efforts to ensure accurate representation of the vehicle's features.
Negative: However, some negative sentiments emerged around the accuracy of the listing and overall presentation. @bro-z criticized the common mistakes found in listings on traditional auction sites like Bring a Trailer, while @Undatakr expressed confusion regarding the conflicting engine and hood emblem information. @knoxTime sought clarification on the functionality of various accessories, indicating potential concerns about the car's condition. Overall, while many were impressed with the vehicle, there were hints of skepticism regarding the seller's disclosure of specific details.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @bimbettocavallo describes their experience with an almost identical 1971 GT 1300 Junior, stating it is a wonderful car that is enjoyable to drive and can keep up with traffic in California. They also appreciate the vehicle's Italian heritage, noting the PE license plate. @Slam105 adds that the car is drop-dead gorgeous and an excellent example of clean Italian design. @firstinline expresses their love for the car's color, reminiscing about owning a similar model and stating that they wouldn't mind getting another. @AlfistiNY shares their experience with 1300 juniors, praising their delightful handling and emphasizing that this model appears well taken care of and unmodified.
Neutral: Various commenters have shown interest in the car's background and history. @todd.rand inquires about shipping experiences from the Netherlands, while @MexLuna shares details about their shipping experience and costs, providing valuable insights for potential buyers. @Martin_480_Turbo questions the significance of the Italian registration plates, expressing interest in the car's story. Meanwhile, @Rivercars (The Seller) responds to these inquiries, confirming details about the oil pressure gauge functionality and other technical aspects, ensuring clarity for potential buyers. @Watry emphasizes the importance of checking the oil pressure with a mechanical gauge, suggesting practical steps for verifying the car's condition.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the car's oil pressure gauge. @AlfistiNY observed that the oil pressure needle did not seem to move much in a video, prompting them to seek clarification from @Rivercars (The Seller). @firstinline speculates that the gauge might not be functioning correctly, given that it does not move off zero irrespective of other conditions. @bimbettocavallo mentions that while the engine runs cold, the oil pressure gauge does not display the expected values, potentially indicating a malfunction. Furthermore, @groupj comments on a noise heard during cold starts, questioning if it might be an engine mount issue. These comments reflect a cautious viewpoint regarding the condition of this classic vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The auction for the Aston Martin Vantage has garnered excitement among commenters, with many praising the vehicle's condition and aesthetic appeal. @smorency1000 expressed enthusiasm about owning a similar model, noting it looks better and has been trouble-free, while @Anighanta remarked on the beautiful Rosso Corsa color. Additionally, @19pbk70 described the car as beautiful and appreciated the detailed responses from the seller, highlighting the transparency and responsiveness during inquiries.
Neutral: Commenters have shown interest in specific features of the Aston Martin Vantage, including inquiries about navigation, cruise control, and sound systems. @K88b268 asked about the presence of cruise control, which @ExclusiveMotorClub confirmed, while @AlextheCatGroomerllc inquired about premium audio, only to learn that it lacks the upgraded system. There were also requests for inspections, with multiple users, including @Trimjc, wanting to confirm availability for viewing and addressing maintenance repairs noted in inspection reports.
Negative: Some potential concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly about potential leaks and damage. @gstigler pointed out separation in the dashboard, questioning its normalcy and whether the airbag had been deployed, to which the seller clarified it had not. Furthermore, @K88b268 and others highlighted specific maintenance issues noted in photos, like leaking shocks, with some commenters seeking assurance that repairs were made. @19pbk70 also expressed concern over possible paint overspray and asked for closer inspection to confirm.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Gslide shares an enthusiastic account of their experience with a 2001 Lexus ES 300, describing it as being in near-mint condition with notable luxury features like a comfortable leather interior and a quiet drive. They commend its great sound from the stock stereo and emphasize the car's ample power and ergonomic design, stating it was the best $8500.00 they ever spent as their daughter loves it. @Johnny1eye echoes this sentiment, appreciating the vehicle's smooth drive and reliability compared to American luxury cars of the same era, affirming that it is a fantastic vehicle.
Neutral: Comments from @911ruf (The Seller) indicate a willingness to answer questions throughout the auction, with replies clarifying certain points about the vehicle's features, such as its non-smoker status and details regarding maintenance records and the timing belt. @1972f100 raises various questions regarding tires and potential service history, showing a cautious interest in the vehicle’s condition. Other commenters, like @coryjeb1 and @GermanDoc, share experiences related to road noise and prior ownership of similar models, suggesting that while some enjoyed the car, others noted some issues regarding wind noise and engine reliability.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, concerns have emerged about potential issues with the car. @GermanDoc recounts their negative experience with engine sludge and recalls that affected similar models, mentioning that it influenced their decision to sell their Lexus quickly. @7nihon7auto7 further emphasizes the worry regarding the engine sludge issue prevalent in the model's V6 engines, stressing the importance of regular oil changes to avoid such problems. Overall, while many praise the car, anxiety about its long-term reliability remains a theme in the discussions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: There are several positive comments highlighting the vehicle's good condition and suitability for adventure. @MattTheBarterer described it as a 'nice JGC from the DaimlerChrysler era' while @36hoursmedia (The Seller) responded that the Jeep runs and drives great, mentioning it had low mileage and minimal repairs aside from regular maintenance and an upgrade to the brakes and wheels. @Windsmak21, although sharing past frustrations with another Jeep model, expressed belief that the person who purchases this vehicle will be satisfied, crediting religious maintenance for its good state.
Neutral: A number of neutral inquiries about the vehicle focused on its specifications and history. @cowboy41 asked about the vehicle's primary use and any previous engine work done, while @guajiro1 inquired about the functionality of the air conditioning, which was confirmed as working great by @36hoursmedia (The Seller). @JamieDufour raised a question regarding the ownership history as indicated in CarFax, and @elly18 sought clarification on the type of diesel engine installed in the 2007 model, leading @36hoursmedia (The Seller) to provide relevant details and reassure potential buyers about parts accessibility.
Negative: Negative comments were subtle but reflected caution regarding potential issues. @Benyboy787 mentioned concerns about common issues with the intake swirl motor, although @36hoursmedia (The Seller) dismissed it as not being a problem with this vehicle. Additionally, @anomadicman brought up possible oil leaks related to the swirl motor but affirmed it to be an easy fix. Overall, the negative feedback was not severe but indicated some common complications associated with the vehicle's model.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is praised for its strong performance and smooth driving experience. @Topwheelsint (The Seller) mentions that it's capable of maintaining highway speeds without any issues, emphasizing the ride's smoothness and reliable shifts. The one-owner history adds to its appeal, and the seller encourages potential buyers with confidence in the car's turning capabilities and overall condition. The cold start functionality is also highlighted, as the car starts immediately and idles smoothly, indicating good engine health. Furthermore, the vehicle's stock condition and lack of rust, being from Georgia, contribute positively to its value.
Neutral: Several comments indicate inquiries about specific aspects of the vehicle, like the radio and air-conditioning system. @BallCoach raises concerns regarding these features and seeks clarification on potential fixes, while @LongDucDong questions the functionality of the glove compartment, pointing out a discrepancy in the advertising. @Topwheelsint (The Seller) responds to these inquiries with detailed explanations, indicating that the radio might need a fuse check and that the A/C issue could relate to low Freon levels. The seller also clarifies that the glovebox opens correctly with the key, which is an important detail to note for potential buyers.
Negative: There are some concerns noted regarding the vehicle's features. @BallCoach remarks on the non-functional radio and A/C, while @LongDucDong expresses confusion over the glovebox's stated malfunction versus its open status in an image. Although the seller attempts to resolve these issues, the underlying problems might influence buyer perception. Additionally, the mention of the A/C not blowing cold due to a potential Freon issue could raise further apprehension regarding potential repair costs and overall maintenance of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the 1996 Corvette Grand Sport being auctioned by @Cellamotors. Commenters like @Bmarcum and @WranglerX express excitement about the vehicle, with remarks highlighting its beauty, condition, and the appeal of the no-reserve auction format. @Jake_Angel gives high praise, stating that this model is a sweet spot for collectors due to its classic charm and modern driveability. @Edgar23 nostalgically recalls gaming memories and expresses a desire to own such a car, reinforcing the positive impression this vehicle makes on potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments raise informative questions and observations about the vehicle. @Ish993c4s inquires about possible leaks or defects, while @Myco1206 points out perceived discrepancies in paint color and alignment, seeking clarification from @Cellamotors. @al8apex also mentions the suspension, noting the absence of optional upgrades. @Cellamotors addresses these inquiries directly, assuring the community of the car's original condition and aligning with their expectations for transparency in the auction process.
Negative: While there are few negative comments, some concerns do arise regarding the vehicle's cosmetic details. @Myco1206 expresses apprehension over potential paint mismatches, which could deter some buyers if unresolved. Additionally, user @jg11228 has his comment flagged as non-constructive, suggesting that not all feedback is taken positively. Overall, despite the few negative notes, the overwhelming sentiment remains positive regarding both the vehicle and the seller's engagement.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle for its overall presentation and features. @Z282SLO complimented the thoroughness of the auction listing, highlighting the inclusion of a video that showcased the car's performance, which is a refreshing departure from typical listings for this model. Additionally, @ACRSNK called the car the 'best of the bunch,' indicating strong admiration for its quality. The detailed description and high-definition media provided by @Bulletmotorsportsinc (The Seller) received accolades for helping potential buyers feel confident about their bids.
Neutral: Some commenters raised neutral inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifics and condition. @KP777 expressed appreciation for the presentation but did not provide further commentary, while @cobraR00 asked about modifications made to the sound system and the status of the rear seat delete during the test drive video. @Civilguy pointed out a ding that was noted in the auction details and requested a photo of the area, reflecting a common interest in transparency about the vehicle's condition. @AutoTrendsTX also commented on the auction process, noting the previous sale’s implications for current bidding.
Negative: Concerns regarding the car's condition were shared by @Shelbyguy1, who observed signs of surface rust and raised questions about potential issues such as tire wear and the absence of a service history binder. There were inquiries about missing documentation like the black binder and whether repairs had been made to flaws noted during the Mecum auction, with @foxjunk directly asking @Bulletmotorsportsinc (The Seller) for clarification. The thread displayed a mix of genuine enthusiasm for the vehicle's attributes interlaced with caution from experienced buyers wanting to ensure they were informed about any existing issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments about the 1937 Chevy truck highlight its impressive restoration and unique history, including its prior ownership by the estate of Richard M. Nixon. @CardiffClassics (The Seller) emphasizes that the truck runs and drives great, and it has undergone extensive restoration work including the addition of power steering, a rebuilt heater, new tires, and a powder-coated frame. The detailed restoration process, which included reconditioning all the gauges and updating the electrical system to 12 volts, has made this truck better than new, providing prospective buyers with confidence in its condition.
Neutral: Several potential buyers have expressed interest in specific details regarding the truck, such as @papabill asking about the wheelbase length, which @CardiffClassics (The Seller) promptly addressed, stating it is 131 1/2 inches. Another user, @GulfCoastin, inquired about a driving video, to which @CardiffClassics (The Seller) explained that such footage was not available from the photo shoot but reassured that the truck drives great and would soon share restoration photos. Additionally, @packman21 inquired about the braking system, and was informed by @CardiffClassics (The Seller) that it was fully restored as well.
Negative: There are no negative comments found in the discussion about the vehicle. All the inquiries and responses have been constructive, with no complaints or criticisms regarding the truck's condition or restoration process. Potential buyers are primarily focused on gathering information and reassurances about the vehicle rather than expressing dissatisfaction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters appreciate the overall condition and care of the 1989 FJ62 Toyota Land Cruiser, affectionately called the Cookie Monster. @Jason noted that the vehicle has been well cared for, has been garaged, and is only driven on dry days, emphasizing its maintained paint and undercarriage. @Retirementfund4me also expressed admiration by calling it a beautiful vehicle, contributing to the positive sentiments shared among potential buyers. The seller, @Keepitcollegial, appears to be engaged and open, providing updates and responding to inquiries, further enhancing the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: The seller has been proactive in addressing potential buyer inquiries. @saxet58 mentioned a concern about an oily undercarriage and potential rust, to which @Keepitcollegial clarified that the appearance is due to maintained undercoating from Krown and confirmed there is no visible rust or previous repairs. @SurfPunk expressed interest in scheduling a time to see the vehicle in person, indicating a serious but neutral interest in the FJ62. The seller provided additional videos showcasing vehicle performance, emphasizing the truck's functionality without any noticeable issues during operation.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the undercarriage appearance by @saxet58, who questioned the source of the oiliness and potential rust repairs. Although the seller responded with assurances about the truck's condition, the initial comment highlights a potential area of apprehension for prospective buyers. No other explicitly negative comments were noted, but the inquiry about the undercarriage does suggest that there is at least some level of skepticism among potential bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Mayjer highlighted the interesting aspects of the vehicle, noting its late 1961 model year and unique features like the external fuel tank and Rokee dash. He expressed appreciation for the retention of the front drums and the presence of a 1275 engine, although he was concerned about the automatic transmission's condition. Overall, he found the vehicle appealing, awarding high marks for its color and potential upgrades. @freddyfender (The Seller) acknowledged the comments, providing additional information about the vehicle's modifications and reassuring potential buyers about its condition and features.
Neutral: @Derwood pointed out that several parts of the vehicle, such as the rattan side panels and cloth seats, might not be original, expressing concern about the rust on the rear subframe and the engine swap done decades ago. @TimBurr added insight into the vehicle's chassis number and its discrepancies, raising questions about its history. @nickdoc shared his experience with the all-drum brakes, suggesting that while they may function for casual driving, there are limits, and he found the need for a disc brake upgrade after using the vehicle for heavier duties.
Negative: @Derwood's comments reflected concern over the vehicle's structural integrity, particularly with the suggestion of rust compromising the rear subframe, which could hinder its performance in inspections. He indicated reservations about the reliability of the engine swap given its age, leading to doubts whether the vehicle can handle the increased power. @1071S criticized the stance defending drum brakes, claiming they fall short for modern driving needs and suggesting the necessity for easier disc brake upgrades, while @nickdoc echoed a similar sentiment regarding the limitations of drum brakes in more demanding conditions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GiorgioM describes the vehicle as a complete project for a new owner, highlighting its history as a 1968 Chicago Motor Show car. @Garrym appreciates the completeness of the car and offers suggestions for restoring it, expressing an optimistic view that it could be enjoyable once fixed up. @Kauai shares excitement about the potential end product after restoration, indicating that the vehicle has the capability to be turned into something amazing with enough time and investment.
Neutral: Several users have inquired about specific documentation and details regarding the vehicle's condition. @johnmereness asks for information about the window glass, to which @ClassicheMasters responds with a video providing detailed information. The seller also clarifies the significance of the Belgian customs document and confirms that there is original U.S. title documentation available, addressing queries from @Zorglub and @jocaj regarding the vehicle's provenance and export processes.
Negative: @centerfireman humorously remarks that potential buyers should "bring a wallet," implying that the car will require significant investment. @Zorglub questions whether any attempts have been made to 'unseize' the engine, suggesting concerns about its condition, while @DutchPaul critiques the video taken of the glass for being poorly shot, indicating dissatisfaction with the seller's presentation methods. Overall, there is an acknowledgment that restoring this vehicle will involve addressing multiple needs, as noted by @Zanny1.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters like @JAY-Z and @mlesko73 describe the 1968 Mustang as a powerful and impressive machine, referring to it as a "war horse" and a "beast". They appreciate the classic muscle car appeal and note that the restoration makes it a head-turner. @Hoppy18 even refers to it as the "fastest glass of vintage American red wine on 4 wheels". The seller, @JD930, expresses optimism about the auction and emphasizes the car's well-cared-for history in drag racing, hoping it finds a good home.
Neutral: Opinions seem to be mixed regarding modifications and authenticity. @Likeparty calls attention to the great build and optional selections, while @PeachStateClassics points out that such cars are rarely available for sale. The discussions also touch on details like the missing original air cleaner assembly and modifications to the vehicle, with @CarFoolLane discussing the original air cleaner's cost and availability, suggesting that it is not easy to find original parts.
Negative: However, there are concerns regarding the vehicle's specifications and modifications. @Aanenson mentions a potential issue with the installation of lifters, and @LittlePieces questions modifications such as the removal of armrests and whether later mirrors can be easily swapped. Commenters voice curiosity about the car's stock parts and express that some modifications may detract from its value or authenticity, indicating a level of skepticism about the car's market appeal due to these alterations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @tzickefoose commented positively on the appearance of the H2, describing it as nice-looking and expressing excitement about the potential for someone to own it. @boaboyoz praised the H2 for its fantastic Graystone Metallic color and impressive build. @bradyharm91 appreciated the vehicle's cleanliness and low mileage, highlighting its loaded options and the high engineering quality typical of GM at the time, calling it an amazing example of a true SUV. @ArtistFox remarked on the rarity of the rear captain's chairs and recognized it as a very cool optioned SUV.
Neutral: In response to various inquiries, @JJJ3240 (The Seller) confirmed that there were no issues with the vehicle and that no modifications were made. The seller addressed questions about the validity of bidding and offered to provide additional photos of the undercarriage to satisfy requests. Multiple users engaged in discussions about the authenticity of bids, with @Colinscc questioning the bidding progress and @boaboyoz defending the legitimacy of a particular bidder. @Samsbringingatrailer asked about Bluetooth capabilities, to which the seller promised to check.
Negative: @Barryward expressed dissatisfaction with the seller's delayed response to requests for undercarriage photos, indicating a lack of willingness to engage further in bidding. @sironside pointed out inaccuracies in the seller's claims regarding Bluetooth availability in 2008 H2 models, asserting that it did not come equipped with that feature from the factory. @Colinscc continued to doubt the authenticity of the bidding process, suggesting potential manipulation and raising suspicions about the reliability of prior bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: There are various aspects of the vehicle that users appreciate. Comments point to its unique character as a Disco Sport SE, standing out among similar vehicles. It has been handled by multiple owners, which some see as a testament to its longevity and appeal.
Neutral: The vehicle's history, having spent its life in rust-prone areas, raises questions among participants in discussions. While it has undergone several ownership changes, the longevity of its performance may vary based on maintenance practices and care over the years. Additionally, the mention of Chinese tires suggests a mixed level of quality control in the tires used.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition are highlighted by @2literPeter, referencing its past in rust country and the implications that may have on its overall integrity. The community is cautious about the potential hidden issues that may arise due to rust damage and the choice of tires, leading some to question the soundness of purchasing such a vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters appreciate the overall condition and performance of the 1996 Chevrolet Corvette coupe. @watergate528 describes it as a "Sharp Vette," highlighting its appealing design and aesthetics. @slammin notes its cleanliness, especially considering its mileage of approx. 3k miles per year, and signals interest in detailed specifications by asking for the RPO codes. @Todd_B expresses positive anticipation for bidding, commending the clean Carfax and asking detailed questions that imply confidence in the vehicle's maintenance.
Neutral: @WCD2020 (The Seller) provides a thorough description of the Corvette, mentioning its specifications, features, and maintenance history, which contributes to an informative atmosphere. There are frequent requests for specific information about the car's components, such as the operational status of the transmission from @bobr85, and details about the targa top and tires from @Todd_B, indicating interest in the vehicle's functionality. The seller offers to provide additional information or videos in response, fostering a transparent discussion.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding shipping costs, with @Jimbo9999 and @WayneG01 labeling them as high compared to expected expenses, suggesting it may deter potential bidders. @Brookscompton expresses skepticism about the tires, urging for confirmation of their age as they appear to be old. Overall, these concerns reflect hesitation amongst bidders about both the perceived value of the vehicle and the practicality of acquisition logistics.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and nostalgic appeal. @Jimbos1954 and @OldZzz both expressed admiration for the bike, with @OldZzz reminiscing about riding one at a young age and fondly recalling its impression on him. The discussion reflects a sense of excitement about the vehicle, with comments suggesting it looks fun to ride and respects its vintage design.
Neutral: Several comments focused on inquiries about the bike's specific features. @Richard2222 asked about the original switches and second overbore specifics, showcasing interest in the bike's mechanical condition. @braktrcr inquired about the title situation and whether the bike could be street-legal, highlighting the complexities associated with registering older models. @DEGSZ06 (The Seller) responded to these queries, clarifying that the originals were not included and detailing the necessary steps to obtain a title in California.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects, some concerns were raised about legal issues and component availability. @Mercury_Man shared a troubling experience with obtaining a title for a similar bike, depicting the bureaucratic difficulties he faced and implying potential frustrations for future owners. Additionally, it was noted that the bike was not originally street-legal, which may deter some buyers looking for immediate usability without modifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's cleanliness and maintenance, with @Chefgordiemac expressing enthusiasm by stating, "This thing is CLEAN! GLWTA!!" @GregRex (The Seller) also reassures potential buyers about the truck's excellent condition, noting that it has no interior flaws and has been professionally detailed, which may be a key factor for buyers looking for a well-maintained vehicle. Buyers appreciate @GregRex's willingness to provide additional information and videos confirming the truck's functionality, further contributing to a positive perception of the seller's transparency and communication.
Neutral: Several inquiries and comments from potential buyers indicate a general interest in the vehicle's specifications and history. @GoBigBlue asks about the timing of the last smog check, while @Cleancutmover inquires about the reason for selling. @ITR640 raises concerns about potential maintenance issues, asking for videos of the vehicle's features and the status of components like the A/C and brakes. @CincySparty also demands clarification about the last brake service and the vehicle's roadworthiness for long drives, showcasing buyers' need for thorough information before making a decision.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism or concerns about the truck's condition. @Eankers1850 points out possible stains on the seats, prompting @ttammag to question the interior's cleanliness further. @ITR640 expresses concern over potential leaks and the previous reprogramming of the PCM, suggesting issues that could arise post-purchase. Although @GregRex responds to these pointed questions with assurances, there remains an undercurrent of cautious interest from potential buyers, particularly regarding the vehicle's complete history and current maintenance status.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dustyx shared his positive experience with a similar Subaru Forester, expressing a desire to purchase this one if he had the space. He clearly appreciated the vehicle's performance. @danielleh noted the vehicle is super clean and believes the surface rust is minimal, stating that it should not deter potential bidders. She emphasized that head gasket issues are not common in turbocharged Subarus, wishing the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: GranSportCollection (The Seller) indicated that the 2004 Subaru Forester 2.5XT has a clean history and has undergone recent maintenance, including a new oil change and transmission service. He provided reassurance regarding the undercarriage corrosion, stating it was primarily surface-level and confirmed by a local restoration shop. Additional underbody photos were provided following a request, demonstrating the seller’s responsiveness to inquiries.
Negative: @kburk2025 expressed concern over the surface rust present on the undercarriage and asked for more photos. He also inquired about the head gasket and turbo maintenance records, indicating a desire for more transparency. @OriginalTwoTone brought up that many potential buyers are concerned about whether the head gaskets have been replaced, highlighting a common worry among Subaru enthusiasts. Overall, there seems to be apprehension regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and the condition of certain components, especially among more knowledgeable bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Gary_T1 describes the vehicle as a 'top shelf build' of a classic Falcon with the perfect setup of a small block v8 and manual transmission, ideal for cruising or street racing. @Oliver2711 expresses their strong admiration by simply saying, 'Love, love love…!' @boaboyoz calls it a 'bodacious black BC Falcon' and appreciates the awesome build quality. @Fordnatic mentions that this Falcon has all the right equipment and color and is likely professionally built; despite worries about pricing and its location in Canada, they still describe it as a gorgeous car. @SDSprint praises it as 'nicely done and so far beyond a day-two build', ideal for cruising the highways, indicating that this Falcon is definitely desirable.
Neutral: @Goss47305 asks about the process of getting a car shipped from BC to the US and expresses uncertainty about the logistics involved. @Wheels4life inquires about the air cleaner offset, suggesting a potential improvement. @HughDRose seeks to arrange a time to view the car in person, showing interest but not making a definitive comment about the vehicle itself. @myvz2000 poses technical questions regarding the clutch type and electric fan, wanting to clarify potential issues. The seller responds to these inquiries, indicating their willingness to provide specific information and assist potential buyers in the process of import.
Negative: @FordNutt humorously expresses their desire by reminiscing about a family car, but this longing could imply potential disappointment if they cannot acquire the vehicle. @Speedneeder requests to verify the VIN location and photo quality, indicating possible concerns about the car's documentation. Similar inquiries by @Donzi18 and @cwtool about the headliner and radiator suggest unease about specific aspects of the car that may need attention. @myvz2000's question about overheating also reflects potential worries regarding the vehicle's performance, potentially casting a shadow on its otherwise strong reputation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Vic (The Seller) has presented the 996.1 as a stunning vehicle that runs and drives exceptionally well, showcasing his confidence in the car's performance. Commenters like @endurance_29 and @cantaffordit24 have positively noted the car's appearance and potential as a desirable model among 911 enthusiasts. The seller has been responsive to inquiries, confirming that the car drives straight and explaining the history of the car's service and features, including the interior's leather finishing.
Neutral: There are questions regarding the service records, particularly concerning the IMS bearing replacement and clarity on the car's mileage, as expressed by commenters like @MannixMartija and @Emk_cruisers. Some commenters, including @SPEDRCR and @mfmfm, have inquired about details of various features, such as the build/options sticker, side skirts, and the condition of the front bumper cover, reflecting a typical curiosity for collectors looking for detailed information. @BAT has also responded to @KCe46's comment about the tire's status, demonstrating engagement with the listing's accuracy.
Negative: Several comments reflect concerns about the vehicle's documentation and specific performance aspects. @ThreatHunter raised a discrepancy between the Carfax mileage and the listed information, while @endurance_29 noted what appeared to be an alignment issue during a driving video, causing uncertainty about the car's handling. @Agd302 pointed out the lack of tangible evidence regarding the IMS replacement, highlighting a potential red flag in the vehicle's service history, while @Spedrcr expressed doubts about moisture lines observed on the door panels, suggesting potential ongoing issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the Scout as a "Jungle Green dream" and a "Fabulous build," expressing excitement about the vehicle. @tlcamg agrees, calling it a "clean machine" and praising the rare color that pairs well with the interior. The vehicle is noted to be an eye-turner on the roads, which is also affirmed by @Djspelliscy, the seller, who appreciates the compliments and the attention the Scout has received.
Neutral: Several inquiries regard the vehicle's features, including @wjg546 asking for pictures with the roof off and @DG3 interested in details about the rust repair and rewiring. @Djspelliscy responds to these requests, confirming that the top comes off easily but hasn't been removed for photographs and providing photos of the rust repair and under-dash wiring. This shows that while there is enthusiasm for the vehicle, there are also practical questions concerning its condition.
Negative: No negative comments regarding the vehicle were noted in the discussion. All remarks appear to be positive or neutral in nature, focusing on the vehicle's aesthetics and features rather than expressing any dissatisfaction or concerns.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @krkuhn (The Seller) provided a detailed account of the car's maintenance history, emphasizing that the oil was recently changed and that the vehicle passed its state inspection in July. They highlighted the replacement of critical components like the engine and transmission mounts with OEM parts, as well as the completion of important recalls, showcasing their commitment to the vehicle's upkeep. @Zoraspride also shared a nostalgic perspective about their own similar vehicle, expressing how well it performed until an unfortunate accident and indicating a desire for the same model again.
Neutral: @krkuhn (The Seller) acknowledged the concerns about the TPMS light being on and clarified that it was simply a low tire pressure warning that was promptly addressed. They also mentioned the rear bumper's paint issues due to previous pressure washing, noting that this occurred after they purchased the vehicle. Additionally, they raised a concern regarding discrepancies in the Carfax report they received when purchasing the car, which indicated prior damage not disclosed at the time of sale.
Negative: @twilhite62 pointed out potential concerns regarding the vehicle's brakes, specifically mentioning that although the brakes were serviced last year, the rotors appeared grooved and inquired about possible pulsation during braking. This raises questions about the overall condition and maintenance of the braking system, which could be a point of concern for potential buyers.
![]() |
48k-Mile 2011 Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD LTZ Crew Cab Duramax 4×4
1GC4K1C88BF230307
Lot 219012
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is highlighted for its impressive low mileage and excellent overall condition, both inside and out, according to @ttocs6991 (The Seller). It features a powerful Chevy 3500 Duramax 4x4, and its deep tires and well-maintained interior make it ready for work, as pointed out by @JAY-Z. Additionally, @Calamari_Jujutsu remarks on the reliability of these trucks, suggesting that any buyer would be fortunate to own it.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding the specifics of the vehicle, such as tire brand and date codes from @vinnycarwash and @Lauhoffm, which @ttocs6991 (The Seller) confirms will be addressed. @cgsmith0524 points out the location of the DEF refill, which is identified as being inconvenient. The seller also clarifies that there have been no issues with emission sensors or leaks, and gives reassurance about the functionality of the truck's features.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the condition of the oil filter, where @triley301 questioned if it was leaking. @ttocs6991 (The Seller) acknowledged the issue and mentioned it would be checked by a mechanic. Furthermore, there was a mention of a scuff on the woodgrain dash that could be addressed if a buyer desires perfection, as indicated by @Lauhoffm's inquiry. Overall, while the majority of comments are positive, a few buyers expressed their doubts about specific mechanical aspects.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle, a 1991 BMW 318is Slicktop, has received numerous compliments for its driving experience and the level of care it has received from its current owner, @L3MONADE. Enthusiasts note that this E30 is a fun car that teaches drivers how to handle the vehicle better, with several commentors, including @Csaw00 and @wem5310, praising its performance and appeal, especially in the classic color Brilliantrot. The seller has successfully maintained the car, improving its mechanical reliability and driving feel, which was highlighted during a recent trip through the Smoky Mountains where the car was said to perform flawlessly over an 800-mile journey.
Neutral: Commentors such as @CharlieK911 and @Chrisv006 raised relevant questions about the vehicle’s smog components and specifications concerning wear and internal maintenance. @Chrisv006 inquired about the true mileage and any potential rust, while @zamyorusan had similar concerns regarding the car's condition, specifically about the potential rust and the state of various parts like the pinch welds and rocker panels. @L3MONADE responded promptly to all inquiries, providing detailed explanations and additional photos, which demonstrates the seller's commitment to transparency.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the car's condition, with @samyorusan mentioning the presence of rust in the battery tray and questioning the functionality of various components such as the windshield washer nozzles and fog lights, which @L3MONADE confirmed were not connected. Other issues mentioned included the coolant temperature gauge's malfunction and the slight sticking of the driver's key slot in the locking system, which, although not a dealbreaker, indicates some areas are in need of attention. Overall, the transparency about the car's condition and the willingness of @L3MONADE to address these concerns may still encourage potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Koach mentioned that this Maserati is a beautiful one-owner vehicle, which originally had all new floor mats installed to protect the originals. The car has been well-maintained and kept in excellent condition, including the rear trunk mat. The seller confidently states there is only one owner despite a title issue that shows two, underscoring the overall integrity of the vehicle.
Neutral: @UncleJake inquired about the tire mileage and the functionality of the car's electronics. @Micheladas asked how many keys come with the car, and @Carload requested the engine number. @jamest89 was curious if the car would be reliable for a long drive back to North Carolina. @AGARWAL2032 sought clarification on non-smoking ownership, tire tread depths, upcoming maintenance needs, and the condition of the brakes and transmission, indicating a thorough interest in the car's current state.
Negative: @AGARWAL2032 raised concerns about potential issues such as battery drain, alignment problems, infotainment issues, and sticky interior buttons. There were no responses from @Koach directly addressing these specific concerns about maintenance or repairs that might be anticipated, which could suggest that some potential buyers might feel uncertain about the car's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @farmer67 called the Thunderbird a 'sick car!', highlighting its appeal. @1Birdbrain (The Seller) pointed out the rarity of this 1960 Thunderbird sunroof coupe, noting that only 2,536 were produced with a factory sunroof, which is often referred to as the 'GOLDE-TOP' Thunderbird. Additional features mentioned include a stunning 2-tone custom paint, chrome and stainless bright-work, and various upgraded components like a rebuilt engine, power steering, and electric windshield washers. The vehicle has received accolades such as Best of Show and People's Choice at car shows, signifying its outstanding condition and appeal. Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's rare features and high-quality restoration.
Neutral: Commenters acknowledged the rarity and unique features of the vehicle. @lostit inquired about the presence of rust, to which @1Birdbrain (The Seller) confidently stated that there is zero rust on the car. This reassured potential buyers about the car's condition. @AlternativeFacts noted the rarity of the vehicle, mentioning a past encounter with a similar model, while @rexfox found the car cool. The comments reflect a mix of curiosity about the car's condition and acknowledgment of its classic status.
Negative: Some comments brought up potential concerns about the vehicle. @rexfox noted that the 'wind bar' might contribute to wind noise inside the car. @1Birdbrain (The Seller) acknowledged this point and explained that the wind bar is important for authenticity, despite its sometimes noisy nature. @TXbird, reflecting on their experience, stated that without a wind bar, wind would blow around inside the car, causing a disturbance. This feedback suggests that while the car is highly praised overall, there are minor imperfections that could affect the driving experience.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's features, design, and color. @Dollycat3 praised the spaciousness, color, layout, and design details, highlighting the vehicle's overall appeal. @1996MBZ noted its fun off-road capabilities, suggesting that it offers more adventurous travel options compared to standard motorhomes. @whateva also positively remarked on the vehicle's attractive color, contributing to a sense of satisfaction among potential buyers regarding aesthetic choices.
Neutral: Inquiries from potential buyers focused largely on technical specifications and maintenance details, with @mchonda, @AdvntrLuvr, and @GBachTR asking about the water tank capacities and dimensions. @67numberfive (The Seller) provided detailed answers about the vehicle's fresh water and holding tank capacities, ensuring transparency about its functionality. Questions about the build year, chassis details, and title annotations were clarified by @67numberfive, indicating a proactive approach to addressing buyer concerns and inquiries.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about potential issues with the vehicle. @boksburgboy asked about damage reported on the side panel, specifically whether it affected plumbing or electrical components. @ljweb inquired about possible discoloration in the cargo area, raising doubts that @67numberfive dismissed by attributing it to lighting. Overall, while there were concerns regarding the condition and technical aspects of the vehicle, the seller was responsive and provided assurances.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is highly praised for its overall quality, with several commenters expressing enthusiasm about its condition and features. @Paulmiller1653, a previous owner of a similar model, looks forward to acquiring this car, mentioning it as a great car they had for a decade. The seller, @Bridgewater_Acura, emphasizes the car's excellent maintenance record, noting that it has been service history documented, and even highlights that the dash is in mint condition. Additionally, @CiaoChow remarks that this 2006 Acura TL is among the best examples available, appreciating its rarity given the mileage many similar cars had.
Neutral: Some comments address concerns regarding the rear bumper's paint mismatch and the vehicle's history, but these are countered by reassurances from the seller. @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 points out that while the rear bumper might not match perfectly, extensive imagery in the gallery should alleviate concerns regarding any potential serious damage, indicating that the car still appears to be in good shape. @Bridgewater_Acura provides detailed responses to inquiries and offers potential solutions, such as capping repair costs at $500 if it comes to that.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, there are critiques and concerns raised about the vehicle's bumper repair and overall condition. @Darkstar0821 noted the cost to fix the rear bumper cover could be significant, and @ELROD questioned the quality of past repairs and match of the paint. @CarlosinAustin also expressed confusion over the color mismatch. Furthermore, @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 felt that their positive comments were overlooked by the seller, indicating a disconnect between the seller's reassurances and the commenters' apprehensions regarding the car's condition and the importance of verifying past repair work.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentor @Acorn19 describes the vehicle as a 'Stunning Model A,' reflecting a strong appreciation for its aesthetic qualities. @Dave6488MA (The Seller) echoes this sentiment by explaining that the car was a significant part of his late father's legacy, drawing attention and admiration at local events and car shows. The overwhelming response to its condition and beauty reinforces the car's vibrant reputation in the community.
Neutral: @Gord6 believes that the vehicle deserves more attention and financial value than it currently has, indicating a general agreement with the positive sentiments expressed but without giving specifics about its performance or functionality. @MRHWD raises a question about the color of the vehicle, specifically asking if the green shade is a stock color for the Model A, suggesting an interest in more technical details regarding the car's authenticity.
Negative: There are no negative comments reflected in the provided feedback. All comments lean positively towards the vehicle, showcasing a strong appreciation from viewers and potential bidders. The seller maintains an open line of communication for questions, indicating transparency and willingness to engage with interested parties.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @P0rsche956 expresses appreciation for the S7 and RS7 models, praising their V8 engines for their presence and noting that he prefers them over the newer models with the 48V mild-hybrid system. @Dexandsqueak shares a fond memory of owning a 2014 S7, highlighting the incredible interior and expressing a desire to own one again despite having sold it due to high repair costs. These comments reflect a strong admiration for the performance and aesthetics of the vehicle.
Neutral: @genevamotorcars (The Seller) provides a road test video which may be informative for potential buyers but does not offer a personal opinion or insights about the vehicle's performance or features.
Negative: @P0rsche956 raises concerns about the reliability of the 48V mild-hybrid system, suggesting that it could present issues if it malfunctions. This sentiment is echoed by @Dexandsqueak, who mentions that repair costs influenced his decision to sell his S7, suggesting that maintenance may be a downside for some owners.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the unique design and craftsmanship of the vehicle. @Erioc described it as "unique and really cool," while @DetailDave (The Seller) showcased specific aspects of its construction, highlighting the craftsmanship in the exhaust header. @Dennis_Jimenez and @Mordizzle praised the work of its builder, with @Dennis_Jimenez noting the consistent excellence of Fenical's creations. @gritsandbourbon reflected on how the vehicle stands out in any parking lot, while @POSIES explained the influences and engineering behind the build, supporting the vehicle's intriguing design and structural elements. @pigman also noted the excitement surrounding the unusual engineering, suggesting that enhancements could be made to elevate the build further.
Neutral: Several comments were neutral, focusing on questions and inquiries about the vehicle's features. @RiverBill asked about the presence of a hood and whether the air conditioning keeps the interior cool. @Brooksie1979 was curious about potential paint issues, while @DetailDave (The Seller) reassured that the paint was in great condition and answered other technical questions regarding the vehicle's dimensions and features. The discussion included technical details, such as the exhaust setup and the nature of the chassis, indicating that the commenters were interested in understanding the vehicle's capabilities and specifications.
Negative: On the negative side, comments included criticisms about certain aesthetics of the vehicle. @bakman simply reacted with a strong "NO!" to the design, indicating disapproval. @BonVivant expressed a similar sentiment, stating personal preferences regarding the need for a hood and questioning the exhaust design. @pigman also highlighted the unconventional nature of the exhaust, suggesting that it could be more visually appealing with modifications. Overall, while there were some appreciative insights, there were also clear indications of discontent regarding specific design elements.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the vehicle's exceptional condition, with @Romxav mentioning its impressive mileage, history, and the fact that it has never been in an accident, ensuring it is completely rust-free. @enzomotori describes it as beautiful, while @frankom finds it fun to watch, and @Tigers196884 appreciates its beauty and value in the market. Many commenters, including @imautohaus, express excitement over potential shipment options and acknowledge the car's well-maintained status, suggesting it has smooth acceleration and overall performance.
Neutral: Several commenters are inquiring about shipping options and costs, with @BobbyP3 seeking estimates for shipping to Houston. @JIMMY notes the car's specifications such as the lack of A/C, ABS brakes, and the presence of an SPG suspension kit, signaling interest in its performance features. Meanwhile, @Romxav plans to assist with shipping arrangements and mentions working with logistics companies to ensure a hassle-free process, offering reassurance for potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments indicate minor concerns about the car, such as @JIMMY mentioning missing underbody parts related to the Airflow kit. Additionally, there is a subtle confusion from @BobbyP3 regarding the model designation, as @Romxav clarifies that it is not a Viggen, but a classic 900. Overall, there are none of the comments indicating major flaws, but the attention to detail signifies that knowledge about the car is being carefully scrutinized.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its charm and nostalgic appeal, with several commenters expressing admiration for its condition and unique history. @froomg described it as a 'classy little hauler' and noted the rarity of its features like power locks and windows. @robiefarmer added that 1985 was a good year and expressed curiosity about the wagon's past. @TheCritic shared personal experiences selling similar cars, praising the vehicle's road performance and comfort, and noting that it was a fantastic find on Bring a Trailer. Many commenters, including @GarageSurfer and @David_C., reminisced about their own experiences with similar models, emphasizing their practicality and reliability while highlighting the appeal of preserving such classic vehicles for future generations.
Neutral: Several commenters focused on the vehicle's specifications and condition without strong emotional responses. @newcarpro provided detailed information about its features, including its paint colors and custom interior options, while @johnjm calculated options costs, noting how they significantly added to the base price. @Edv530i pointed out a timeline of ownership, mentioning that it was auctioned in 2016 with a notable bidding history. A few commenters also remarked on the car's design features, like the greenhouse shape for visibility mentioned by @CarFoolLane, which contrasts with modern SUVs. Overall, there was a balanced mix of curiosity and factual remarks about the vehicle's specs.
Negative: Some comments highlighted skepticism or confusion regarding the car's low mileage. @TucsonFutureClassics sarcastically remarked about the 'wanting money' from more cars like this, while @dragstrippanties81 joked that the odometer somehow reset each day. @Idy-ho questioned the condition by analyzing a specific photo for potential paint damage. Meanwhile, @David_P made a tongue-in-cheek remark about the car being the staff vehicle for a fictional 'J Body Mafia,' indicating a lighthearted critique of its appeal. Additionally, some commenters expressed disbelief at how these low-mileage vehicles keep appearing, suggesting that the phenomenon is both surprising and strange.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Andrei29 describes the vehicle as the "best BMW ever" with the "best engine" and "color". @cj11 appreciates the car's color and prefers the modified exhaust tips over stock options. @pocketstime and @xDLXSFx both compliment the car's stunning color, suggesting it looks even better in person. @RobisonService (The Seller) assures potential buyers of the car's solid condition and highlights the quality of repairs done to handle various issues, showcasing the appeal of the rare color and low mileage. Overall, several commenters express excitement and interest in the vehicle's unique features.
Neutral: Some comments focus on the balance of the car's recent work, such as @gweaver noting the $32k invested with some unresolved minor issues. @Eiremon acknowledges the vehicle's unique features and the work completed but points out it's a "bit of a puzzle" and suggests it may need additional attention. @RobisonService (The Seller) mentions the variability in what buyers may prioritize for repairs, indicating the car, while well-maintained, may still require personalized upgrades depending on the new owner's preferences.
Negative: However, several critiques emerge regarding the owner's significant spending, with @Sixtyvalve questioning the value added by the $32k work done, suggesting many repairs should have been more cost-effective. @trizzuth raises concerns about the lack of necessary timing chain guide work, and @lospice1 emphasizes the risk of needing further repairs post-purchase. Comments from @Eiremon and @DOlsen indicate confusion around the necessary additional investment, highlighting discrepancies in the perceived value relative to the costs incurred by the current owner. Overall, there's a sense of caution surrounding potential hidden issues despite the car's unique attributes.
![]() |
Single-Family-Owned, LT1-Powered 1937 Chevrolet Master Deluxe Sedan Street Rod
AG3356
Lot 219014
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @JAY-Z praised the vehicle's cool family history and build, while @GLWTA,dutchboy4 called it a beauty. @P0rsche956 highlighted its attractiveness, documentation, and presentation as well as complementing it for being pretty and formidable. @Toptime79 appreciated the understated design, emphasizing its elegance without going overboard on colors or decals, and @rickaz noted it as a capable family hauler. Others like @MasterDebator and @E_Ferg26 also expressed admiration for its execution, echoing sentiments of its beauty and craftsmanship. Even the seller, @bama4005, reflected on the car's maintenance and show-ready status, inviting further inquiries from potential buyers.
Neutral: @bama4005 (The Seller) provided insight about their long ownership, sharing that the car has been part of their family since 1937, and expressed gratitude for the interest shown in the listing. The seller mentioned its careful maintenance and readiness for shows, asserting its capability as an enjoyable piece of automotive history. @E_Ferg26 also expressed a personal connection, relating it to their own project while providing constructive feedback about wheel choices.
Negative: There was limited negative feedback captured, but @ppointer inquired about the current status of the builder Buddy Osborne, implying uncertainty regarding the car's origins or craftsmanship details. This question could hint at a lack of clarity about the car's build history or potential issues surrounding its previous ownership or construction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a lot of admiration from the community, with several commenters praising its aesthetics and build quality. @nonuniform noted its appearance, calling it "too pretty" and complementing @911r on the top-notch photos. @mgmken expressed their excitement with a "WOW! Nice work" sentiment, while @DakotaSteve simply described it as a "SWEET JEEP! I’m Watching!!!". Additionally, @shortbus901 shared how the Jeep serves as inspiration for their own restoration project, showing how it resonates with fellow enthusiasts. The restoration work, particularly by Remuda Motoring, has also been positively highlighted, with commenters like @LittlePieces admiring the color combination and EFI work.
Neutral: Comments also provide some neutral observations about the Jeep, including inquiries and background stories. @bsbviper asked about the availability of a top and requested pictures, indicating a curiosity about the complete specifications of the vehicle. @EngineCo345 reminisced about previously encountering the Jeep and expressed a feeling of nostalgia, while @amarcionek mentioned their surprise at the auction progression, indicating a general intrigue without strong emotions attached. There was also mention of the link to the Remuda site shared by @911r, enhancing the information available to potential buyers.
Negative: However, not all feedback was purely positive; some users expressed critical points that could affect the vehicle's desirability. @SOOR provided a thorough critique of the restoration, noting lacks such as no hard top or doors and mismatched colors on the trim. They pointed out possible concerns regarding the gear ratio and various components, suggesting that while the Jeep is not "perfect", it was still quite close. This critical perspective contrasts sharply with the overall enthusiasm, illustrating that while many are impressed, some find notable areas for improvement.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @HKMotors (The Seller) describes the Macan Turbo as being in near perfect condition with only 40k miles, suggesting that it was well cared for by the previous owner. The seller mentions that the vehicle runs and drives great and highlights that the transfer case fluid was changed and was clean, indicating good maintenance. They emphasize that the car is ready for a new owner and offers shipping options across the country and Canada, which adds convenience for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters engage with the seller asking for further details about the vehicle's condition and history. @OldGuy1234 raises questions about potential recalls regarding the fuel line and fuel pump, while @Marcusa asks for pictures of the underside due to concerns about rust, given the vehicle's east coast history. @midcapwarrior inquires about the number of keys available, and @vanye777 requests shipping costs to their location, reflecting a general interest in the vehicle.
Negative: @OldGuy1234 expresses concern about recalls not being addressed, suggesting potential oversight in the vehicle's maintenance history. @bmwspyder inquires about the transfer case and AWD issues, indicating a level of skepticism about the seller's claims regarding the vehicle's condition. Overall, some commenters seem hesitant about certain aspects, particularly concerning potential recalls and the history of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: There are numerous commendations regarding the car's overall condition. @7257scottt describes it as the nicest low-mileage original '57 Thunderbird he has ever seen, emphasizing its amazing condition. @downesphoto, the seller, actively engages with potential buyers and offers to provide additional photos of the soft top, demonstrating a commitment to transparency about the vehicle. The car's classic color scheme also garners appreciation, with @JMGO expressing enthusiasm over the coral beauty, likening it to his own 55 Bel Air convertible.
Neutral: The comments reflect a mix of curiosity and requests for further detail about the vehicle. @p-38 inquires about photos with the soft top in place and questions regarding the car's air conditioning system and driveline work, indicating potential buyers want comprehensive information before making a decision. Furthermore, @birddoc and other commenters note the importance of confirming whether the soft top is original, showcasing the desire for clarity in the vehicle's features and parts.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about the car's modifications and potential issues. @birddoc notes the need for a bit of TLC and questions the absence of the original carburetor, suggesting a preference for original parts. Additionally, @AimHighToday mentions that the radio is not original and asks about the inclusion of any original parts, while also highlighting discrepancies regarding the paint code information. @downesphoto acknowledges these concerns by clarifying aspects about modifications and disclosing minor blemishes, which suggests there might be some wear that buyers should be aware of.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Tomme9 expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as one of the most fun, dependable, and affordable BMWs he's owned, highlighting the enjoyment he's had with the car. @Jimmyblues1959 admires the vehicle after watching a driving video, sharing nostalgic memories of his daily commute from the 1970s. @Roundel4ever finds the car beautiful and well-cared-for, while @Pignat914 reminisces about owning a similar model with his wife, wishing to get another one.
Neutral: @GregRex (The Seller) provides clarifications on the car's performance, stating that it recently had services done and cold starts great. The AC and radio functionality get confirmed as operational and @Maxismile seeks information regarding the ownership history for confirmatory reasons, indicating interest in understanding the car's background. @Redbaron95 acknowledges the E21 as a hidden gem, suggesting that while it has character, it’s essential to consider the potential quirks of older BMWs without major rust issues and discusses the mechanics involved with maintaining such vintage models.
Negative: @Redbaron95 raises concerns about the vehicle's cold idle performance, hinting at possible issues like the idle air valve needing cleaning. Further, @Mike_in_GA questions some repair receipts and expresses the need for transparency regarding any outstanding maintenance items. Additionally, both @Redbaron95 and @Roundel4ever note the propensity of these early E21s to rust, with @Redbaron95 insisting that rust repair history should be scrutinized, reflecting potential apprehension about the long-term viability of the automobile.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the black Cougar XR-7 as "sinister, sexy, and very cool," while @Cougarguy22 commented, "This thing is CLEAN. WOW." These remarks highlight the car's impressive aesthetic appeal and condition. Additionally, @AirBoss52 reminisced about owning a similar model in the past, expressing a desire to find it again, indicating a strong affectionate connection to this type of vehicle. This nostalgia is a testament to the enduring allure of classic American muscle cars.
Neutral: @racer355, the seller, provided detailed insights about the vehicle, emphasizing their commitment to transparency and customer service. They mentioned that the interior color was updated to green from black, responding to inquiries and ensuring accurate information about the car. @1940fordcoe also pointed out the correct engine details and the possible condition of the floor pans, providing valuable information for potential buyers taking their interests seriously without showing strong bias either way.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, some users raised concerns about the vehicle. @1940fordcoe noted the lingering rust that may hinder investment value, arguing that it might not justify further financial commitment. Additionally, there was a complaint regarding the frustration of requiring two-factor authentication to engage with the auction, highlighting a potential negative experience for users. These issues suggest that while there is excitement around the car, practical concerns linger for some prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Boatymcboatface expressed admiration for the navy interior of the vehicle, calling it 'so choice.' @QueenElizabeth3 also mentioned her affection for the blue interior, indicating that there are elements of the car's design that are appealing to potential buyers. @Micahs (The Seller) confirmed that the vehicle is in excellent condition, stating everything works perfectly and emphasizing the quality of the headliner, the straight driving, and the performance of the Rover.
Neutral: @Micahs (The Seller) responded to comments regarding the vehicle, clarifying that an image posted by @FXRcR1 was incorrect and belonged to a different model, a Volvo XC60. @Micahs (The Seller) reassured commenters about the availability of the original rims and confirmed that they come with factory wheels as well. He also welcomed various bidders to the auction and thanked them for their interest.
Negative: @FXRcR1 raised concerns about the vehicle by pointing out a photo of what he deemed an 'inferior vehicle' and noted the absence of a split folding tailgate. This indicates some skepticism about the vehicle's quality or the accuracy of the listing. Furthermore, @QueenElizabeth3 questioned whether the mirrors were wrapped or painted, implying a possible issue with the car's finish.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Zeldadog: Gorgeous Ghia! And close to home too! Air cooled VW’s are getting more and more difficult to find, I’m sure this one will do well. GLWTA! @kingkarmann: Other than an obvious nose job this looks to be a solid, dry example. Always a plus with rust prone KG’s. Anyone who’s looking to do a running project or contemplate a total resto will be miles ahead. GLWTA! @Braukuche: Nice looking car just needs a few items and it’s good to go. @356SCresto (The Seller): This car has been well attended to with a new engine, tires, and other upgrades, which make it an appealing option for buyers looking for a solid vehicle.
Neutral: @AvionicsTech: The seat belts are normally found in race vehicles. Was the car ever used in any type of racing event? Are the original seat belts available? @AvionicsTech: Does the cabin heat and windshield defrost work? Or have the parts been removed? @LCLee: Do you have a cold start video? @Rmander45: @kingkarmann – sorry to be thick, but what did you mean by "nose job"? @Rmander45: Thanks for the info and for thinking about my self-esteem.
Negative: @356SCresto (The Seller): I noticed the rear main seal was leaking, and I eventually discovered the gland nut had been over-torqued and ruined the crankshaft. I found surface rust under the battery box and on the passenger door. @rondai: @356SCresro I noticed that the plates have 2019 stickers on them. Is this vehicle licensed for the street? Plates have been expired for 6 years. @kingkarmann: I see some evidence of what looks like filler ahead of the horn boot and wrinkles in the metal. It’s a common repair with many Ghias.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mr_fillup (The Seller) describes the Jeep as a standout vehicle with only 80,000 original miles and emphasizes its rust-free condition and clean paint. The interior is also noted to be in great shape, with no significant damage reported. The lift has been properly installed, and the vehicle shows no signs of shaking or instability at various speeds, contributing to a smooth driving experience. Overall, it is presented as a reliable vehicle, ready for enjoyment.
Neutral: @Formisano5 inquires about the vehicle's running condition and location, while @EKP asks specific technical questions regarding the engine and top replacement. @CamaroForMe raises a question about the Jeep's smog test status, showing interest in its legal compliance in California.
Negative: @CamaroForMe expresses concern regarding the Jeep's smog test history, indicating potential legal or operational issues. This raises questions about the vehicle's readiness for sale in California, as the seller mentioned it just passed an emissions test in Nevada, which may not guarantee compliance in CA.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments from @Rpl1 express enthusiasm for the bright yellow color of the vehicle, calling it a 'smoking, hot little toy' and noting its visual appeal. The seller, @LukAutoGroup, maintains a positive tone as well, presenting the 1932 Ford Highboy Roadster as a beautifully crafted example of a hot rod, highlighting its high-quality build and modern features, such as a clean engine bay and comfortable interior. The deeper engagement with prospective buyers includes offering assistance with transport and providing driving videos to enhance buyer interest.
Neutral: @bezmanian requests additional content, such as running videos for potential buyers to assess the vehicle further. Questions from @4343nascar about the trunk release mechanism and emergency brakes were promptly addressed by @LukAutoGroup, illustrating the seller's willingness to provide information and solve inquiries about the car's features. There is also a discussion about fit for taller individuals, with @LukAutoGroup confirming that the vehicle can accommodate a 6-foot driver, ensuring that practical considerations are attended to.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the vehicle's visual stance and specification, notably from @loggdon and @mike_rockwell, who feel the front end sits high due to the lack of a dropped axle, which could significantly impact the car's aesthetics and value. Additionally, @4343nascar questions the condition of the body for any chips or cracks, but @LukAutoGroup reassures him that the vehicle is in excellent condition with no flaws noted. Overall, the feedback highlights a mix of enthusiasm and constructive criticism, emphasizing areas of potential improvement.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @DjangosHP describes the vehicle as 'MINT', indicating high quality and excellent condition. @RHUDE praises the craftsmanship by expressing that 'The Italians know what they're doing' and adds emphasis with 'Belllissssimooo', which translates to beautiful, highlighting the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle.
Neutral: @gunner1038 (The Seller) mentions the challenges of enjoying the bike in Montana due to limited riding seasons. This comment reflects a practical viewpoint on the bike's usage without direct praise or criticism. Additionally, @frostyshot asks a question about a feature on the handlebars, seeking clarification on what it is, which shows curiosity rather than a clear opinion.
Negative: @gunner1038 (The Seller) comments on the number pad feature, mentioning it is a 'Fake security measure' and stating it was never needed because the bike was mostly stored in their shop. This suggests a lack of utility and perhaps points to a design feature that may not serve its intended purpose effectively.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received praise for its overall quality as indicated by @Significant_Cars, who describes it as a wonderful car with great driving capabilities and comfort, especially for long distances. @TheCritic adds that the 1963 model has a simpler A/C system that can easily be revived, making it practical for collectors. Feedback from multiple commenters, such as @veelangs, reflects a sentiment of nostalgia and admiration for the classic 63 model. @Harley_Earl highlights the high drivability and ease of repair, recommending the Caddy as one of the best years for Cadillac.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding the car's features and condition, such as @dandress1's question about the air conditioner and @Middler89's wish for a tilt steering column, which stresses that lacks could be offset by a strong driving experience. @mp5smg and @autoturk commented on arranging viewings and the currency of the vehicle's photos, showing interest while seeking clarity. @Colston's request for a cold start video reflects an eagerness to learn more about the car before considering a purchase.
Negative: Concerns were raised about minor defects and features that may deter some potential buyers. @1995Lightning pointed out what appears to be a dent in the gas tank, while @goldengup mentioned the tilt steering option as a rarity that impacts usability for larger drivers, indicating a negative aspect for some. Additionally, @Significant_Cars confirmed that the A/C does not blow cold, which might deter buyers reliant on air conditioning for comfort. The potential age of the tires was also noted by @Significant_Cars as a consideration for long-distance driving.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @johnnyb11 praised the vehicle for its appearance, noting the low mileage and nice floor mats, indicating a positive impression. @Ronfrohock referred to the car as one of the nicest T's seen in a long time, acknowledging minor flaws that are easy to fix. He expressed confidence in the accuracy of the mileage based on the vehicle's condition, suggesting that with some major work, it could become a desirable Mondial.
Neutral: @vEEEEktore inquired if this vehicle is the last year for the Mondial, to which @E-TypeOTS responded that '93 was likely the last model year produced, with a note of potential '94 titles but no significant changes from '90 onward. @ckcollectibles, the seller, shared paint meter readings indicating the car's paint consistency, aside from a minor repaint on the passenger rear quarter panel, providing necessary clarifications related to the car's upkeep.
Negative: @ainternetguy made a disparaging remark about the initial asking price, suggesting it seemed excessive for a Mondial. @bolin pointed out concerns regarding potential repaint issues, indicating doubts about the vehicle's original condition. Additionally, @59gene raised specific questions about the availability of the soft top boot and the functionality of the air conditioning, hinting at potential oversights or deficiencies in the provided information.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received several positive comments from users who appreciate its solid build and performance. @dannypa, the owner, describes it as an "absolute gem" after two years of ownership, highlighting its super strong engine and enjoyable driving experience. @LarsenEJ shares their love for the car, noting the comfortable seats and the absence of a damaged front bumper. Additionally, @FlyingBricks240, the seller, mentions the clean condition of the car with no major rust issues and recent service performed, further enhancing its appeal. Comments about the color combination of silver and silver, especially without a front license plate, add to the positive sentiment.
Neutral: Some comments were more neutral in tone, querying specific aspects of the vehicle without evident bias. @Paschal raises a valid concern about the undercarriage and potential rust, prompting @FlyingBricks240 to assure that there is no significant rust on the body. @Takeit2go suggests a more definitive cold start video to assess any timing chain noise, while @37demi asks about the rear seat functionality. These inquiries reflect the curiosity of potential buyers, aiming for clarity on specifics about the vehicle's condition and functionality. Overall, these comments indicate a mixture of genuine interest balanced with the need for more detailed information.
Negative: On the negative side, concerns regarding the vehicle's tire situation have been discussed. @marko320 questions the mismatch of tires, while @ekazy notes the potential issue with the spare tire being older. @Takeit2go acknowledges the cold start video but expresses doubts about whether it accurately portrays the vehicle's condition. @dannypa, while defending the car's performance, admits to initial paranoia regarding maintenance and timing chain concerns, reflecting a common anxiety among owners of older performance cars. These doubts highlight the importance of thorough inspection and maintenance history in the used car market.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous comments applauded the vehicle's outstanding restoration, with @bialy1969 remarking on its beauty and @drawbeans expressing a desire for such a stunning car. @jvan20p noted it looks better than new, while @Dtpalmquist emphasized that it's among the best they've seen in 40 years of experience with these coupes. Enthusiasts like @KarlEric, who manages an international Volvo registry, and @pessia shared appreciation for the car's interior and overall restoration, showcasing the high regard this vehicle commands in the community.
Neutral: The seller, @Volvo9365, engaged with several inquiries, indicating the restoration aimed to retain the car's original condition. They confirmed that about 50 miles have been put on the rebuilt engine since restoration and provided a driving video. Queries from buyers regarding the completeness of the package included questions about the absence of tools and a functioning clock, to which the seller provided detailed responses about what will be included with the purchase and noted the restoration decisions made, such as the choice of radio due to fitting issues.
Negative: Some comments raised questions regarding certain aspects of the vehicle's restoration. @87033x6 pointed out the lack of a jack and whether the clock works, while @dragonfly questioned the visibility of body seams and the factory color of the cross member. Although @Volvo9365 addressed these concerns by confirming the changes made during restoration, it highlighted dissatisfaction among detail-oriented buyers about authenticity and potential missing elements. Overall, while the vehicle was largely admired, it also faced scrutiny from discerning enthusiasts concerning specific details.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Ferrari F12berlinetta, highlighting its exhilarating driving experience and beautiful design. @relativetoether noted that driving the F12 leaves one wanting more, praising its performance and increasing value. @Fuzzmeist shared that the car exceeded his high expectations, and @jomo23 emphasized the blend of performance and everyday usability, describing the F12 as perfectly tame for daily driving yet a beast in race mode.
Neutral: @1600veloce (The Seller) provided extensive information about the vehicle's specifications, including its options and recent maintenance such as ceramic coating and PPF installation. The seller also mentioned the car's history and condition, highlighting that it was well cared for. Several commenters inquired about specific details regarding the car's features and condition, such as the steering wheel and potential paint damage, demonstrating an active engagement with the listing.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns regarding the car's condition. @Willclee and @mike_747 pointed out what they believed to be discrepancies regarding the steering wheel finish. @kkayden asked about apparent damage on the hood, while @technom3 and @SB675 brought up questions about button wear and the potential for scratches. This scrutiny indicates that while the F12 is generally well-regarded, potential buyers are attentive to details regarding its condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Gt3drake (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm about representing a rare and beautiful 911 America Roadster, highlighting its unique details that excite potential bidders, as mentioned by @bluesrocker. The vehicle's supple leather interior is noted, with @Cafebisque observing minimal wear. @Gt3drake also provides valuable video content related to the car, demonstrating features and addressing inquiries, making the vehicle's attributes and history more accessible to interested buyers.
Neutral: Other commentors, including @rarrods and @Steven007, are seeking detailed information regarding specific aspects of the car, such as oil leaks and the condition of the tonneau cover. @Gt3drake provides insights into recent maintenance, mentioning oil line replacements and the repairs conducted by a reputable mechanic, thereby ensuring potential buyers are well-informed about the vehicle's upkeep. The comments suggest a mix of curiosity and appreciation for the car's condition while also seeking clarification on the original parts and overall maintenance history.
Negative: @rarrods raises concerns about potential oil leaks from the chain housing and cylinder, indicating a focus on mechanical reliability. Similarly, @Nono2055 questions the reasoning behind including replacement oil lines, reflecting apprehension about potential issues. Additionally, @Steven007's inquiries about cosmetic details like paint condition and lug bolts emphasize a desire for transparency regarding any imperfections that could affect the car's value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @bigdogandy describes the vehicle as constantly delivering great experiences, indicating satisfaction with its performance. @laffman comments on the car's aesthetic, noting its supercharged nature and relating it to his own positive experience with a similar vehicle. @Pettyfan43 praises the GT350 for its exhilarating exhaust sound and driving fun, expressing a strong emotional connection and enthusiasm for the car, indicating a high level of appreciation for the model.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) provides thorough information regarding the vehicle's features and the dealership's operations, emphasizing their commitment to transparent transactions and inviting inspections of the car. The seller also addresses inquiries from potential buyers clearly, such as confirming the horsepower specifics requested by @laffman and the key situation brought up by @68CamaroSS396L78. The seller's responses maintain a professional tone, offering clarity about the car's details.
Negative: @68CamaroSS396L78 raises a concern about only receiving one key with the vehicle, which could be perceived as a downside during a potential purchase. @CaptJerry questions whether the stripes on the car are vinyl or paint, suggesting uncertainty about the vehicle's finish. Additionally, @laffman expresses concern that his specific horsepower question wasn't directly answered, hinting at possible gaps in the provided information that could deter buyers looking for clarity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @stugottz expresses their admiration for the vehicle, declaring it love at first sight and reinforcing this affection even after multiple views. @X-77Keith also praises the bike's appearance, remarking that it is great looking. Additionally, @T_McCool describes the bike as super nice all around, and @Rpl1 notes the rarity of finding a 1971 SL70 with a factory exhaust system in excellent condition, indicating the bike should perform well in the auction. The seller, @Shelby89, highlights its recent restoration and unique summer yellow color, further generating positive sentiment among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters appreciate the nostalgic factor of the SL70. @Kurte551 mentions their experience with the bike being their first ride in 6th grade, which adds a personal touch. @skyancher shares a memory of having collected SL70 sales brochures from a Honda shop, showing a connection to the bike's history. Moreover, @Pipoto raises a practical inquiry regarding the title registration requirements, suggesting a level of engagement from potential buyers that reflects their serious consideration of the vehicle.
Negative: There are no explicitly negative comments regarding the vehicle; however, @Pipoto’s inquiry about the necessity of a certificate of title hints at potential concerns about the registration process, which may deter interested buyers if they feel unsure about the paperwork involved. The absence of outright criticisms suggests that while some logistical questions exist, they do not overshadow the overall positive reception of the bike.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Jobu611 expresses hopefulness about bringing the vehicle home for a price tag of 18k, indicating a sense of eagerness and optimism regarding the potential deal. @tifjeslil, the seller, does not provide detailed feedback but implies engagement in the transaction process, contributing to positive interactions around the sale.
Neutral: @LorenPaul mentions the bidding process which implies that the sale will likely conclude quickly, potentially within a day. This indicates a level of activity and urgency regarding the interest in the vehicle. @Forthefords humorously remarks that the final price will likely exceed 18k, suggesting that there is a general consensus around the vehicle's desirability, although without giving definitive insight into its actual worth.
Negative: @oldjonny raises a concern about the vehicle's rebuilt transmission at 59K, describing it as 'odd.' This skepticism may imply apprehension about the vehicle's reliability or history, hinting that potential buyers should approach with caution regarding significant repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics provides an impressive overview of the 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG, highlighting its 48k mileage and extensive service history. They proudly mention their strong Google Reviews rating of 4.9/5.0, showcasing customer satisfaction through hundreds of 5-star reviews. The Seller emphasizes their commitment to transparent transactions and offers convenient services like inspections, nationwide shipping, and detailed vehicle history reports.
Neutral: There are inquiries from perspective buyers such as @Nathanpink and @RVtransport regarding any potential issues with the vehicle, specifically asking about dings, service requirements, and the availability of a third-party car report. These questions reflect a common diligence among buyers seeking assurance about the car's condition, indicating a desire for comprehensive transparency before making a purchase.
Negative: @Collectibleclassics addresses the concerns posed by @Nathanpink and @RVtransport, assuring them of the thorough maintenance checks completed and confirming that there are no engine lights or warnings on the vehicle. However, the need for such inquiries suggests that potential buyers may approach with caution, wanting to ensure they are not overlooking any underlying problems despite the seller's reassurances.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @jamesburton (The Seller) provided positive insights regarding the vehicle's condition, mentioning that it is in excellent shape with very little wear. He stated that it was his personal vehicle and that there is no indication it was used as a farm vehicle. He also reassured potential buyers by saying that the vehicle can be registered and legally driven in BC, mentioning that he can assist with insurance, which he currently pays for at a vintage policy rate. @WAGONBOYTD expressed interest in the vehicle's desirable engine options, noting the better reliability and tunability of the 15p vs. the 10p engine, indicating a strong appeal among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Comments from @Bill45 and @mmathew show an interest from potential buyers but also raise questions regarding the vehicle's certification for sale and registration processes. @Bill45 inquired about a safety certificate, while @mmathew asked if the vehicle could immediately be registered as a road-legal vehicle in BC, which @jamesburton (The Seller) confirmed positively. There was also a discussion about past registration status, where @WAGONBOYTD mentioned that the vehicle has not been registered for several years, but @jamesburton clarified its current tax status as SORN and its condition, which indicates it hasn't been heavily used.
Negative: @WAGONBOYTD raised some concerns regarding the vehicle's past use and current condition, mentioning issues like potential rust, particularly around the 'chunk' visible in the pictures, implying that it might have typical wear for UK trucks. Although he described it as not being as bad as many others, it still raised doubts about structural integrity. Moreover, @GMorb's initial confusion about the vehicle's legality on Ontario highways highlighted possible regulatory challenges for Canadian buyers, although he later retracted his statement. Overall, the comments indicate some hesitation regarding the vehicle's history and condition despite its appealing features.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, emphasizing its rarity and impressive specifications. @Tripledigit noted the car's low mileage and beauty, referencing its high original price point of over $200,000. @Classicautogarage, an independent Mercedes mechanic, praised the CL65 as one of the greatest coupes ever made, highlighting the significance of its 600 horsepower. The current seller, @TriStarDanny, referred to the vehicle as a 'lovely dinosaur,' reflecting the care and pride put into the car's maintenance. This sentiment was echoed by multiple commentators who pointed out the exceptional condition of the coupe and its potential to appreciate in value, with @TriStarDanny stating it has been well-loved and cared for.
Neutral: There were questions from potential buyers about the vehicle's history and features, particularly regarding the ABC system, which has been a topic of mixed opinions. @fandor inquired about the number of previous owners, while @georgepehanick questioned the maintenance expenses associated with the ABC hydraulic system, noting it as an engineering marvel but also a point of concern for repairs. @PGT_FTW discussed potential issues of 'stickiness' on the steering wheel buttons, suggesting solutions for upkeep. The seller, @TriStarDanny, engaged with questions about the vehicle's original OEM parts and maintenance history, indicating a level of transparency about the car's condition.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance costs and the complexity of its systems. @Classicautogarage warned that while the CL65 is a remarkable car, the expenses related to maintaining the ABC system could range significantly, which may be daunting for some buyers. @gscharnagl critiqued the decision to use sheepskin seat covers, arguing it compromises the functionality of the car's original features. @georgepehanick also chimed in, acknowledging the potential challenges of maintaining the vehicle despite its qualities. The seller, @TriStarDanny, responded to these critiques by emphasizing the importance of preservation and the significant effort made to maintain the vehicle's condition, albeit acknowledging some trade-offs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Spider_Mike shared a humorous anecdote about the similarities between his wife's car and the one being sold, highlighting that it's a comfortable highway vehicle, especially when using adaptive cruise control. This comment suggests a positive user experience with the model. @aegmotorsports confirmed the vehicle is a single-owner with a clean Carfax report, emphasizing that it has been well-maintained, with a comprehensive mechanical inspection conducted post-sale. The seller showcased multiple high-standard features and services that enhance its value.
Neutral: @curtishoman requested more information on the maintenance history and noted the lack of service records despite the vehicle's age, which raised some valid concerns. @GMDP asked about service records as well, illustrating a common interest in the maintenance history among potential buyers. @MEnU inquired about the difference between reserve and no-reserve bids, showing a need for clarity on auction procedures.
Negative: @curtishoman expressed skepticism about the clean Carfax report, questioning the absence of service records throughout the vehicle's seven-year history, which may invoke apprehension among potential buyers about hidden maintenance issues. @atty2001 acknowledged that while the vehicle appears well-cared for, the lack of substantial records raises concerns typical of used car purchases, making it a gamble. Additionally, @LayNout's question about the lack of blind spot detection features indicates a desire for more advanced safety features that some users might find lacking in this model.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @berner2011 described the vehicle as "absolutely gorgeous" and noted the rarity of original, low mileage Broncos from this era, expressing eagerness to watch the auction closely. @BCCarr (The Seller) highlighted the vehicle's maintenance history and low mileage, reiterating the Bronco's survivor quality and its potential for appreciation in value. Additionally, @philfromok confirmed that all systems, including dash lights, heat, A/C, and window operations, are functioning perfectly, which adds to the overall appeal of the vehicle.
Neutral: @salp55 inquired about the reason for selling, noting that the Bronco had previously been listed, which suggests its relevance and interest level in the marketplace. @Oldwoodie1927 asked if prior roof dents were repaired, indicating that potential buyers may want clarity on the vehicle's condition. @EelKram's question about the vehicle's emissions and catalytic converters showed concern for compliance, which @BCCarr (The Seller) confirmed by stating it had passed recent emissions tests.
Negative: @Oldwoodie1927's inquiry about roof dents implies potential issues with the vehicle's bodywork may deter interested buyers. Additionally, @philfromok's concern about the functionality of dashboard lights and other controls may hint at reliability concerns, as he noticed nothing illuminated in a cold start video. The seller's response clarified these functionalities but indicated some buyers are cautious about the overall mechanical condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 and @pagoda69 noted that this vehicle is a great example of an SL in a beautiful color that deserves restoration. @17yrsWith930 remarked on the car's solid structure for a 55-year-old vehicle and praised the color combination, suggesting that it has great potential. There's a general sentiment among commenters that while the car may need work, it is a worthwhile investment.
Neutral: Some commenters, including @stevewrealty and @PhilSanchez, raised several practical questions about the vehicle's condition, including the need for video walkthroughs, potential fluid leaks, and existence of rust or prior collision damage. @Inon, the seller, clarified that the car currently does not start but has had intermittent engine functionality, and acknowledged the presence of some cosmetic issues like hairline cracks and dented areas. Commenters sought further documentation and transparency regarding the car's history and maintenance, emphasizing their interest in assessing the vehicle for restoration.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition were prominent among commenters. @Klumper expressed doubts about the vehicle's running status and highlighted its need for major recommissioning due to dry-rotted components. @roosterabbydog brought attention to a potential discrepancy in the odometer reading, while @PaPa8X revealed serious issues discovered during an in-person inspection, including rust holes, deteriorating leather, and missing structural elements like the original headlight notches. Overall, there is a general consensus that the car requires significant restoration before it can be deemed roadworthy.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @JAY-Z noted that the British Racing Green color looks stunning on the vehicle, and @HAPPY agreed, calling the color combo perfect and very unique. @Boatymcboatface commented on the beautiful specifications of the car, suggesting that the photos do not do it justice. @Red99 praised the car's colors and especially liked the four-seat configuration with a full-length wood console, mentioning its good service history. @1Marauder described the interior as 'other worldly beautiful', indicating strong positive impressions of the vehicle's aesthetics.
Neutral: The seller, @jona627, acknowledged @AGLeS for pointing out the incorrect photo in the listing, clarifying that there were no Audi keys included with the vehicle. Responding to inquiries about specific features, @jona627 confirmed their intentions to provide additional information regarding maintenance records and the owner's manuals. They also noted the presence of three original keys for the Bentley and assured potential buyers that videos showcasing the interior, headliner, and undercarriage would be posted soon.
Negative: Several comments raised concerns about the condition of the vehicle, particularly regarding potential damage. @Bill4629 and @1985RR asked for clarification regarding damage to the underside of the car, which was hard to assess based on available photos. @dleep expressed worries about the leather quality on the dash and headliner. Additionally, @Carlbuckinthehouse shared doubts about the British Racing Green color and whether it was a custom selection, rather than the classic Bentley stock color, suggesting some viewers may find it less appealing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @orange456 expressed enthusiasm about wanting the vehicle for some time, indicating a strong interest in the car's uniqueness and desirability. @Guillene40 (The Seller) has actively responded to potential buyers' inquiries, addressing specific details like the carbon roof and the condition of the vehicle. The seller has shared information about the car's maintenance, demonstrating a commitment to ensuring it remains in good condition, further enhancing buyer confidence.
Neutral: @2vcarter requested additional photos of the carbon roof and a driving video, showing interest in more visual evidence of the car's condition. @Mattmann5209 raised a concern about oil drain plugs without further context, suggesting a need for clarity on maintenance issues. @Nicogab inquired about the original wheels and minor damages, seeking further details on the car's history, while @Guillene40 (The Seller) provided information about the current state of the car and previous repairs, revealing a balanced interaction between the seller and potential buyers.
Negative: @M3rryChristmas's comment about the car potentially living in a dusty area implies concerns about cleanliness and maintenance. @orange456's inquiry about major work done to the vehicle hints at worries regarding its long-term reliability and possible hidden issues, adding an element of skepticism. The seller's admission that the car has not undergone major repairs, while reassuring in some aspects, may not fully alleviate concerns for interested buyers about the impact of low usage and the originality of parts like bearings and throttle actuators.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ronjohn commented on the vehicle's visual appeal, describing it as a "Nice looking Samurai." Additionally, @Perryburch (The Seller) expressed confidence in the vehicle's condition, stating, "The rig is super solid no repairs needed and I would confidently drive anywhere every day." Furthermore, @Perryburch confirmed that the vehicle has a new exhaust system including a catalytic converter, adding to its reliability.
Neutral: @EelKram inquired about the presence of catalytic converters, to which @Perryburch (The Seller) confirmed their inclusion. Questions regarding the vehicle's air conditioning came from both @Perryburch (The Seller) and @Buda1701, with the seller clarifying that it does not have AC but assured potential buyers about the vehicle's cleanliness despite it appearing dusty in photos. @sjavid asked about the rig's capability for a long-distance trip, reflecting curiosity about its reliability for substantial travel.
Negative: Several comments expressed concerns about potential issues with the vehicle. @ronjohn raised questions regarding rust signs and fluid leaks, indicating worry about the vehicle's longevity and reliability for a 1000 mile cross-country trip. @Buda1701 also pointed out the dusty interior, questioning the cleanliness of the vehicle, hinting at a need for an interior detail before purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is being presented as a stunning 2005 Audi A4 cabriolet with only 21,000 original miles and a rare color combination, which the seller passionately describes as amazing. The comments from @michaelmotorcar emphasize the authenticity of the car, stating that it is likely to have its original paint and showcasing his commitment to provide detailed pictures and videos of the vehicle. He invites potential buyers to inspect the car in person and offers shipping assistance, creating a welcoming environment for bidders.
Neutral: There are inquiries from potential buyers such as @calstickshift and @gadgetman1963 regarding specific details about the vehicle. @calstickshift questions the repainting of the rear bumper cover, and @gadgetman1963 poses questions about the separation of the rear window glass, tire date codes, and the timing belt replacement due to the car's age. The seller responds to these inquiries by reassuring with comprehensive information, demonstrating a willingness to address buyer concerns.
Negative: Some comments suggest a degree of skepticism, particularly @calstickshift's inquiry about the rear bumper cover possibly being repainted. While the seller insists that the vehicle has been carefully inspected and all bumpers appear original, the uncertainty surrounding the paint's authenticity is echoed in the conversation. @gadgetman1963 raises additional concerns regarding the vehicle's aging components, such as the timing belt, reflecting a buyer's due diligence in avoiding potential issues associated with older vehicles.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Reconjr (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a cool old Merc and offers manuals with it. @Dollycat3 expresses admiration for the car, calling it a sweet little European Fintail 200 and notes there is much to love about it. @lukenallen shares a personal experience, stating that despite leaking during rain, driving the car brings immense joy and garners positive attention on the road, indicating it’s fun and enjoyable to drive.
Neutral: @Bordeaux provides insight about the distinguishing features of the W 110 model, noting its tailfins and design influences. @bondgraham believes the vehicle appears to be nice overall, suggesting it could be a good candidate for someone looking for a driver or project car, while emphasizing the importance of personal inspection. @Reinhold asks about title registration in Illinois and the AC functionality while also questioning if it's an issue for the dealer based on the vehicle's location.
Negative: @pjarhead raises concerns about potential water infiltration with specific references to parts of the car that may be problematic. @flyingdago criticizes the absence of a Kuhlmeister air conditioning system, implying that the vehicle's condition may not meet the expected standards for cars of its class. @JFSHORN questions the functionality of various components and expresses worry about leaks, demonstrating skepticism about the car's overall reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters have expressed appreciation for the vehicle's overall condition and aesthetic appeal. @Anbele noted that it appears to be a "real clean example" which suggests that the build quality and maintenance history may be commendable. The design of the convertible is also highlighted as a point of admiration, demonstrating its potential attraction during more favorable seasons for open-top driving.
Neutral: Amidst the admiration, @Anbele pointed out the unfortunate timing for the auction, citing that the current season may not be conducive to convertible sales. This comment indicates an understanding that the market can fluctuate based on seasonal trends, which may affect the vehicle's auction outcome. The expectation for increased interest towards the end of the auction reflects a wait-and-see attitude from the community regarding the vehicle's final valuation.
Negative: On the downside, there appears to be a lack of engagement from the community, as @Anbele lamented that the 124 is not receiving much attention from the BAT community. This insinuates that while the vehicle may be in excellent condition, it is not capturing the interest it deserves, which could ultimately impact its final sale price or value in the eyes of potential buyers. The combination of seasonal timing and low interest suggests potential challenges for the seller in achieving a favorable outcome.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Discobob praised the vehicle's condition, noting that the bed is brand new and the Lund visor and topper are valuable vintage accessories, expressing confidence in its market potential. @TacomaLX (The Seller) describes the truck as an exceptional original example, highlighting its legendary reliability, immaculate exterior with factory paint, and well-preserved interior. The Seller emphasizes the truck's collector-quality status and its garage-kept history, which is evident in the lack of rust and damage, making it a rare find among Toyota pickups.
Neutral: @TacomaLX (The Seller) provided detailed descriptions of the truck's features, including the condition of the upholstery and the engine, its mechanical performance, and various accessories included with the sale. The Seller also communicated with potential buyers about updates, including the promise of new pictures and videos to showcase the truck's condition. Throughout the comments, the Seller maintained a friendly and engaging tone, inviting people to view the vehicle and participate in the auction.
Negative: @dangerisland raised a concern regarding the installation method of the sun visor, questioning whether holes were drilled into the roof but received reassurance from @TacomaLX (The Seller) that the visor is professionally installed with preventive measures to avoid leaks. While this comment pointed out a potential issue related to the vehicle's modifications, the Seller addressed it with confidence, indicating that there are no concerns about leaks.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle project, with @bobofohio excited about seeing pictures of the finished car. @willwedge humorously noted that 'some assembly is required.' @GatorDMD referred to the project as 'cool', while @RogerD stated that early 911s are 'definitely worth saving' and that this looks like a doable project for someone with the right skills. @Speedmetal_Ink (The Seller) shared details about the car's history and components, emphasizing the potential of the 1966 Porsche 911 and its many restored parts, highlighting that it was a complete car when found and is a worthwhile restoration project. Additionally, @Acey praised the seller as a great mechanic and noted the high value of the rebuilt parts included with the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters mentioned practical details about the project. @notlikelytowin4 asked for the VIN, which @Speedmetal_Ink (The Seller) provided, indicating that the car has an active VIN (303609). @DamianM_CA expressed interest in the project but raised concerns about the rust in the driver's rear frame, seeking clarification about the passenger side. @Moonshadow47 inquired about the hubcaps and whether the engine and transmission are original to the car, showcasing interest but also a need for further information. Comments demonstrate a mixture of admiration for the car's potential and inquiries about specifics.
Negative: Comments also revealed skepticism concerning the vehicle’s condition and future restoration efforts. @autokunst noted that 'there's not much here' indicating a significant amount of work ahead. @Lexday47 shared a rather pessimistic view of the car as a 'nightmare' but suggested it could be an interesting father-son restoration project. @francisH compared the VIN of this Porsche to his own, hinting at the challenges of tracking production details. Lastly, @onlyhonda4me made a critical comment about how the car looked like it had been parked in a poor location, which adds to the concern about its condition. Overall, while many acknowledge the project’s potential, there remains a clear awareness of the extensive work required.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @grovers44 finds the vehicle wonderful and expresses hesitation about modifying it. @porkpiehat describes it as a 50's futurists dream and fun to drive, while @RiffRaff agrees with the space-age feel and wishes success for the sale. @Gettin_old is impressed by the uniqueness of the car and the platform it’s being sold on, commenting on how they love discovering such gems. @mikeb23ft appreciates the vintage drag video, noting the car looks solid and unique.
Neutral: @KSJ1865 has always liked this type of vehicle and notes its quality at a past car show. @tripleblack admires the well-finished interior that stands out among kit cars and takes notice of its unique features, while @e9er reflects positively on the car's aesthetic seen in person. @TheOMDude raises questions about the engine design's timeline and its title history, expressing some confusion. @Racecarchip (The Seller) clarifies the vehicle’s title history and expresses gratitude for the comments received, stating the car draws crowds wherever it's taken.
Negative: @Habu2 questions the aesthetics of the engine placement in the vehicle design, suggesting uncertainty. @1967Shelby notes confusion about engine installation timelines related to the car's history, while @AFL914 inquires about the original hubcaps, revealing a lack of completeness in the vehicle. @TheOMDude's confusion persists regarding whether the engine was included in the original title. Meanwhile, @RussellS contributes a note about another project car, hinting at the varied states of vehicles from the same era.
![]() |
4,100-Mile 2006 Harley-Davidson CVO Screamin’ Eagle V-Rod
1HD1PPG116K976758
Lot 219038
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @JAY-Z praises the vehicle for its awesome paint job on the fenders and air box, highlighting the work done by Gunslinger Custom paint in Colorado. Additionally, @VRSCSE2, the seller, emphasizes the exceptional quality of the limited Custom Vehicle Operations (CVO) motorcycle, noting its limited production of only 523 units in the striking Chrome Yellow Pearl and Platinum Pearl colors. @RHUDE enthusiastically expresses admiration for the eagle design on the bike, further adding to the positive reception of its aesthetics.
Neutral: @3H0nda0rphans provides contextual information about the vehicle's original MSRP in 2006, stating it was priced at $26,495 for the top-of-the-line V-Rod. Also mentioned is the rarity of this particular model, especially given its distinctive color combination, making it potentially a great deal for buyers interested in a unique motorcycle. This information positions the bike as both a collectible and a desirable purchase.
Negative: @VetteTEB raises a concern regarding the fuel gauge, questioning whether there are any issues with it registering properly. This indicates that while the bike is visually impressive, there may be potential mechanical concerns that prospective buyers need to be aware of when considering their purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Viktheknife (The Seller) presents the Fisker Karma as an exciting opportunity, emphasizing its unique qualities as a regular summer car driven solely by his wife. The vehicle has been well-maintained, always garage-kept, and has had a full set of fresh fluids in 2023, along with a new 12V battery, VCM reflash, and replaced tires in 2022. The seller notes that the car operates as expected, showcasing its stunning beauty and solid design which has aged remarkably well, inviting potential bidders to inquire further and expressing confidence in the car's reliability.
Neutral: @abscars expresses a positive interest in unusual cars and the plug-in hybrid concept, indicating a desire to embark on an adventurous road trip should they acquire the vehicle. They seek reassurance regarding the car's condition for such a journey. @Viktheknife responds, affirming that the car is routinely used for trips in Detroit without issue, implying that it should be capable of handling long-distance travel, provided standard precautions are taken. Additionally, @bmwspyder inquires about the car's range and any potential electrical issues, expressing curiosity about its performance features.
Negative: @bmwspyder raises concerns by asking if there are any electrical problems with the vehicle, suggesting a potential source of apprehension for buyers. While @Viktheknife assures that there are no known electrical gremlins, the slow right-front window mentioned in the listing shows that not every component works perfectly. This minor issue hints at the possibility of maintenance concerns that could deter some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters generally express satisfaction with the vehicle's durability and style. Notably, @RS60Spyder comments on the quality of the seat material, MB Tex, which they claim wears better than leather. @cj11 praises the timeless design of the car, saying it still looks great even in 2025. @evldur-jr shares their positive experience with their own similar model, noting its reliability and ease of maintenance over time.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about specific features and details of the vehicle. @mlowengrub suggested including '4MATIC' in the auction headline to attract more bidders. @Fitito asked about the number of previous owners and service records, to which @Collectibleclassics responded that there have been two owners and the car has an extensive service history. Additionally, @jimmy1767 inquired about whether the speedometer could switch to kilometers, indicating a possible interest from international buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the car's condition and features. @Sixtyin6 pointed out a noticeable imperfection on the driver's side front tire and questioned if there were any other flaws not visible in the pictures. This concern was acknowledged by @Collectibleclassics who confirmed the tire issue and offered to replace it at dealer wholesale costs. Furthermore, @mlowengrub noted the absence of a backup camera, highlighting a potential drawback for some buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Panteraguy (The Seller) highlights that this vehicle is a real F2000 Formula Continental Face Car with a successful racing history, having won in its last competitive season in 2007. They note it performed well during its last outing in 2016 at Thunder Hill and set a practice track record. Additionally, @formularacer emphasizes the car's reliability and cost-effectiveness within the open-wheel formula category, citing its aerodynamic advantages and the availability of affordable parts, making it an excellent choice for entry-level drivers transitioning from lower racing classes.
Neutral: Several commenters seek clarification on various aspects of the vehicle's condition and requirements. @SwiftFF5 raises questions about the age of critical components like the belts and fire system, while @10tenths points out the need for more information about the engine and potential modifications. Notably, @KM63 describes the differences between versions of the Van Dieman, mentioning that this particular model is more stock with possibilities for conversion to FF1600 that could potentially enhance its performance.
Negative: There are dissenting voices regarding the car's competitive edge, with @Paddy disputing @formularacer's assertions about the car's performance, suggesting that the Van Dieman would lag behind faster models by a significant margin. @andrewjason1 inquires about the current running condition of the car and its readiness for racing, highlighting concerns from potential buyers about the vehicle's immediate track viability. Overall, there are doubts raised about the engine's history and the car's overall performance compared to others in its class.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dspoljaric praises the BMW for its classic aesthetics, highlighting its lines, color combination, and M package, making it an ideal summer cruiser. @carcar123454321 shares a positive experience with the 135i M-sport, commenting on its exhaust characteristics and beautiful appearance. @carsbikeswhatever expresses a deep emotional connection to the vehicle, stating it reignited their love for cars and driving, noting its compact size, turbo engine, and impressive features, especially the convertible top operation.
Neutral: @XJBaxter questions whether a catless downpipe is installed due to the exhaust being louder than usual. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) confirms that the sound is indeed nice, referencing the stock setup. @mn_car_guy discusses their experience with a previous 135i and acknowledges some minor issues with the convertible top without a definitive answer about separation, while @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) reassures there is no separation.
Negative: While most comments are positive, @mn_car_guy does mention a concern regarding separating between the rear window and the convertible top fabric, reflecting a common issue he faced with their vehicle. This highlights a potential flaw that could be a drawback for interested buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reveal appreciation for the classic vehicle's preservation and care, with @hotrodsllc mentioning that the car is a well-taken care of classic, kept in a garage by a couple who have maintained its original authenticity. Buyers express interest in additional details such as pictures or videos, which indicates a level of curiosity and demand for the vehicle. @hotrodsllc also offers assistance in providing more information and facilitating the sale process, which is a positive aspect for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the $150 documentation fee charged by the dealer, with @19Willys46 questioning its necessity. @hotrodsllc explains that the fee is lowered from the usual $350, providing context that the dealer is operating on behalf of the vehicle's owner. @Hackberry brings up a point about dealer fees being commonplace, though some interpret this as a minor annoyance rather than a major issue, suggesting a middle ground of understanding about the seller's practices.
Negative: Concerns arise among commenters regarding the $150 documentation fee, with @19Willys46 expressing frustration and ultimately deciding to withdraw interest in the vehicle. Others, like @Hackberry, imply that the fee could deter potential bidders or lead to a reduced offer on the vehicle. Additionally, @19Willys46 argues that fees may be distinct when purchasing through an online platform like BaT compared to traditional dealerships, indicating a lack of trust or skepticism about the transparency of fees involved.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its color and overall aesthetics. @watergate528 called it a "Sweet Runner!", while @LH3726 exclaimed that it "screams Petty Blue in the late 60s early 70s," describing it as an "awesome car and awesome build." @PSFarm suggested adding a big number 43 on the doors as a potential tribute, and @Paul6200 was also impressed, thinking it resembled Richard Petty's car and calling it beautiful. The Seller, @smokinoak, described the unique backstory of the paint coming from Richard Petty's Garage, adding intrigue to the car's appeal. @Pettyfan43 and @runaway27 also praised the car's beauty and uniqueness, highlighting its artistic quality.
Neutral: The comments include inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and features. @alexg182 asked for more video content and details about the car's performance, specifically whether it runs on pump gas and the compression ratio. @LH3726 inquired whether the Plymouth lettering was painted or in decal form, to which @smokinoak confirmed that the letters are decals. In regard to the manual, @CastellanMC also sought clarification about its authenticity, and @smokinoak confirmed the car originally was a stick shift but has since been converted to a five-speed. This exchange showcases potential buyers' interest in the vehicle's details beyond its appearance.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism or concern about the car's usage, specifically regarding its mileage and wear. @Beepbeep69 noted the surprising low mileage of only 300 miles over 13 years, implying a lack of use that could be concerning for potential buyers. There were humorous references to the car's steering performance in traffic, but @Beepbeep69's comment hinted at a possible danger within its power. Furthermore, @ParadiseRoad mused about gas mileage, evoking nostalgia for past driving experiences, which could also imply questions about the car's practicality today. Overall, while the vehicle was celebrated by many, some commenters had reservations about its history and usability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @aegmotorsports (The Seller) describes the 2013 Mercedes Benz R231 SL550 as a gorgeous vehicle, boasting features like a Twin-Turbo V8 engine, advanced safety systems, and luxury packages including the Premium P01 and Sport Wheel Package. The car has a well-documented history with regular servicing at a Mercedes Benz dealer, conveying a sense of reliability. Commenter @swb911s expresses his admiration for the vehicle, calling it an absolutely wonderful machine, which highlights its appeal among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @VTBenz and @gb70, inquired about the vehicle's mileage, noting that there was confusion around whether it was 61k or 71k miles due to a CARFAX entry. @aegmotorsports clarified that the actual mileage is 60,938, addressing concerns about the accuracy of third-party reports. @OutWest asked whether the SL550 was equipped with ABC suspension, which @aegmotorsports confirmed it does not have, suggesting that this might be a positive aspect for those wary of maintenance costs.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's interior condition, especially from @zmega and @HiSport, who noted significant wear on the driver's side that seemed inconsistent with the reported mileage. The driver's seat was described as distorted, with split leather, prompting a suggestion for repair. @Rock26 added that there was noticeable wear on the passenger seat as well, questioning if this could be addressed affordably. While @aegmotorsports attempted to address these issues by offering repair estimates, the damage reported has cast some doubt on the overall condition of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Capt._Doug highlights the Packard as a well-kept, stately example of engineering from its era, suitable for tours and caravans, providing reliability and comfort. @boaboyoz praises the vehicle as a wonderfully stylish example, noting that early bids reflect its appeal. @Payneangelfire states that the Bijur, an automatic lube system, functions effectively, having used only a small portion of it despite significant mileage, emphasizing the car's innovative features and overall performance.
Neutral: Comments like @Dairyman's mention that the Packard is essentially the entry-level model for its year, recognizing strong interest reflected in the bidding. @tmakarius inquires about the reserve price, indicating curiosity about the car's pricing and status in the market. @Payneangelfire confirms there is a reserve price on the vehicle, showing transparency about the sale process and the vehicle’s desirability among potential buyers.
Negative: @hr47cars expresses concern about the aging classic car community and the necessity for a more comprehensive driving video to attract buyers, highlighting the challenges in the market. @BMcD requests additional video content to enhance the presentation, indicating that the current materials may not fully capture the car's allure. @Burke questions @Payneangelfire about the missing driving video after learning of an injury that prevents the seller from showcasing the vehicle as originally hoped.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GarrettNFord stated that the vehicle looks brand new, while @RecoveringAtty described it as a great find. @CRUSH highlighted the classic appeal of the vehicle, saying it's a 'Classic P!'. @enginepy praised the car for being fantastic, specifically appreciating the absence of a sunroof, which can lead to potential problems. @Powerandart expressed admiration for the Porsche Cayenne, recalling its significance in automotive history and its appeal to a specific audience. @El_solo_lobo echoed this sentiment, remarking on the impressive handling of the vehicle, noting that it feels like a sports car despite being an SUV, and expressing confidence in the satisfaction of the future owner.
Neutral: The seller, @AutoSourceGroup, provided detailed information about the vehicle's history, noting it has low mileage of 15,000 and is in remarkable, unmodified condition. They highlighted recent comprehensive servicing which included various maintenance tasks, promoting the car as a well-preserved example of its generation. They also welcomed pre-purchase inspections, suggesting transparency regarding the vehicle's condition. Several potential buyers asked questions about the car's service history, with @GGG05 inquiring about service records and potential known flaws, and @BWJones asking about tire dates. @damoreno993 and @Quiks1vr inquired about recent inspections and specific components of the vehicle, emphasizing a thorough evaluation process among interested parties.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the Cayenne's coolant pipes by @Powerandart, who indicated that while the newer design was an improvement, it still posed risks due to not being entirely upgraded to aluminum pipes. The comment suggested caution for potential buyers regarding this vulnerability. Additionally, @TAG questioned the implications of the car's lack of a sunroof, while @Po06 pointed out the absence of one but seemed uncertain why. There were also general inquiries about the vehicle's condition, including requests for inspection reports, which may indicate some potential buyers' hesitance without further verification of the car's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect an overall positive sentiment regarding the vehicle, particularly praising its aesthetics and build quality. @IdahoGreg54 described it as a "Beautiful car," while @AlfaMale17 emphasized its beauty and expressed curiosity about the paint bubbles, indicating that the car captures attention. Others, like @johnjm and @PorscheGuy49, highlighted the harmonious color scheme and impressive drivetrain, respectively, showing that many admirers appreciate both the design and mechanical enhancements of the El Camino.
Neutral: Several comments provided useful information about the vehicle, such as details regarding its features and specifications. @Carl1962 confirmed the authenticity of the car's specifications and highlighted managerial diligence regarding the auction processes. The seller, @lambogas, actively engaged with potential buyers, providing clarity about various attributes of the car and responsiveness to inquiries, showing that there is ongoing communication and transparency in the auction process.
Negative: Despite the overall admiration, a few concerns were raised about the vehicle. @Dibblidoge questioned the paint bubbles and their cause, suggesting potential prep issues. Furthermore, inquiries about the lack of power brakes, the adjustment of the gauges, and the car's restoration documentation reflected some hesitation about the vehicle's readiness and completeness. @tcraver expressed disbelief regarding the absence of a power booster, indicating potential shortcomings in the car's performance capabilities.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is highlighted as a good runner and driver with 56k original miles, a rust-free frame, and has shown no major issues when driven for over an hour and a half. @JDMstagea17 (The Seller) assures potential buyers that the truck would make a trip to Buffalo, NY, and emphasizes its currently registered status along with the availability of a CA smog test for the new owner. Several potential buyers seem interested in its condition, and the seller has been prompt in addressing inquiries about service records, leaks, and the general functionality of the vehicle.
Neutral: Many commenters have asked clarifying questions regarding the vehicle's features and condition, such as @JHernandez inquiring about service records and possible rust issues, while others, like @MUSTDRIVE, confirmed the absence of air conditioning. @chevyman75 requested additional pictures of the truck's bed under the plastic liner and the age of the tires, indicating a desire for thorough information before bidding. The seller's willingness to accommodate these requests suggests a transparent and responsive selling process, which may inspire confidence in potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's condition, such as the impossibility of inspecting behind fender flares without removing them, as noted by @JHernandez. Additionally, the mention of a small fluid drop that does not create a significant leak may raise eyebrows about the overall mechanical condition, and questions regarding possible error codes from the vehicle's system were also posed by @Dave18SF. The lack of air conditioning could be a dealbreaker for some buyers, signaling that while the truck has many positive attributes, there are also notable drawbacks to consider.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mynameistimo expresses excitement about potentially buying a matching pair of DB7s, highlighting the desirability of the vehicle. @grabber36 shares admiration, stating that owning an Aston Martin has always been a dream, emphasizing the allure of this luxury car. Additionally, @ricofafs appreciates the thorough responses from @BobLuther regarding the car's history and maintenance, suggesting a strong interest in the vehicle.
Neutral: Comments from @JTCairns and @Scliffe indicate inquiries about the vehicle's history, particularly regarding its Lemon Law buyback status and its condition after years in storage. @ricofafs seeks clarification on what repairs were necessary to get the car operational again after being garaged for 15 years. @TrailerNoob questions the functionality of the odometer, while others request additional videos to showcase the car's features and condition, reflecting a general curiosity rather than strong opinions.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about the car's past, including its Lemon Law buyback status mentioned by @HTClassicCars, which may deter potential buyers. Additionally, @BobLuther notes that the car has a crack in the windshield, although it won't spread and has passed inspection, which still presents an issue that prospective bidders should consider. @BobLuther also mentions that the tires are old and should be replaced, indicating further maintenance needs for the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the vehicle's impressive condition and driveability. @2caddiesandaMach1 describes it as one of the nicest driving examples of the '67-'79 Fords he has owned, stating it runs smoothly and drives like a new vehicle despite its vintage. Buyers appreciate the truck's well-maintained state and the extensive work that has gone into it, with around $20,000 invested in recent repairs and upgrades. Several commenters, including @Dano3500 and @cjp69, express confidence in the seller, emphasizing his experience and passion for cars, which aligns with their perception of the vehicle as an honest 'survivor'.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle reveal that while it has some aesthetic flaws, such as surface rust and minor dings, the seller is upfront about these issues. @MoRanch mentions a preference against the spray-in bed liner, but acknowledges it was well done and without damage. The truck's features, like the new wiring and functional lights, are appreciated by potential buyers, with questions arising about minor details like the windshield washer system and the condition of the A and B pillars. The ongoing communication between the seller and potential buyers suggests that further details are being carefully considered during the auction process.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding minor issues with the vehicle, such as small holes in the floor pans and the need for a repair on the battery tray. @skbid highlights potential rust areas and suggests the need for a thorough examination of the truck's interior and exterior. @Todd_Z brings up specificity about the intermittent wiper conversion hinting at a non-functional component. Additionally, there are worries about the truck's ability to withstand long drives without problems, with @2caddiesandaMach1 advising caution if someone plans to drive it home. These concerns underscore the need for careful consideration among bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @SlowNRusty appreciates the uniqueness of the LS400 with its cloth interior, calling it cool. @Sparrownaut shares a personal anecdote about a US Market LS400 with cloth that detracted from trade-in value but mentions prefering cloth over leather in hot climates. @Vikes18 admires the vehicle's immaculate interior and describes it as a stately ride.
Neutral: @Reconjr (The Seller) comments on the vehicle's trade value, noting it being a Toyota should help retain worth despite its cloth interior. In response to inquiries about service records and checks, @Reconjr explains plans for a pre-purchase inspection (PPI) and mentions the clean condition of the Celsior. He also responds to requests for a CarVX report and discusses mileage discrepancies with interested buyers.
Negative: @Marabino87 expresses concerns about the lack of service history, particularly between 2018 and 2020, and is curious about timing belt service records. @Sparrownaut points out the rarity of the Celsior variant in the U.S. market, hinting at a potential value issue. Additionally, @Nightkid and @malimd raise questions regarding specific details about the rear seat controls and the grill replacement, signaling a desire for clarification and further information.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's design and capabilities. @WAGONBOYTD praises the attention to suspension, indicating that it enhances the camper setup's stability and ride quality. @GBRBiLL appreciates the overall quality of the vehicle after performing a deeper evaluation, while @BSteeleRVA believes it is purposefully built for adventurous journeys, highlighting the creature comforts it offers. @Bsteiner (The Seller) is noted for providing informative answers regarding the vehicle's specs, demonstrating thorough knowledge and commitment to customer service.
Neutral: Comments reflecting neutral sentiments include inquiries from potential buyers seeking more information about specific features. @Troutbus and @rabbitholepunch both ask about interior height and the presence of a head or toilet. @Pcboogaard suggests that photos or a video of the bed setup would enhance the listing. Additionally, @AnyOldIron poses questions regarding propane delivery to the stove and the origin of the heightened roof, indicating an interest in practicality and build quality without strongly positive or negative sentiments.
Negative: Some negative feedback is present, notably from @GBRBiLL, who criticizes the factory drive flanges as a 'POS' but ultimately follows it up with appreciation for the vehicle overall. The suggestion hints at a desire for improvement while still acknowledging the vehicle's merits. Overall, while not overly negative, it reflects a desire for enhancements.
![]() |
|
|
Positive: Overall, many commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle's qualities. @bigchachu pointed out the rarity of finding such a vehicle with low mileage, suggesting it would do well in the market. @SlowNRusty highlighted the good driver quality of the car, noting that the seat bolster looks good, and the gauge needles are not faded, which adds to the vehicle's appeal. Commenters like @DodgeCoryRam acknowledged the car's outstanding qualities despite some minor issues, indicating that the next owner will likely find it to be an exceptional vehicle. @560SEC_Lover also simply expressed admiration by calling it a beautiful vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @classycars, actively engaged with the comments, responding to various inquiries and ensuring that information about maintenance and features was shared transparently. For instance, @classycars promised to provide photos with the windows down, addressing requests from @jamescward and @laxski32 regarding images of the original wheels. Maintenance work mentioned included a complete tune-up and the cooling system functioning properly, alongside an emphasis on sharing more details about the car's history and condition over time. Additionally, @classycars confirmed the painting was done in a base coat clear coat, as per @jribler's question.
Negative: However, there were some criticisms and concerns raised by commenters. @son_of_stig pointed out the inappropriate exhaust tip and asked for photos prior to the paint job, indicating displeasure with the car's presentation. @SlowNRusty raised concerns about the rust and corrosion on the vehicle due to its past in MA, highlighting the rusty exhaust tips as an eyesore. Other commenters like @iprikhod inquired about potential leaks and the working condition of the hydraulic suspension, showing concern about maintenance and possible lingering issues. There were also comments regarding the replacement of certain parts, such as the chrome piece on the front bumper, which @DodgeCoryRam noted did not diminish the vehicle's overall appeal but still raised questions about authenticity and quality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous comments praise the BMW R1100S for its aesthetic appeal and riding experience. @SnoDawg remarked positively on the bike's ageless design, noting it still looks great even after 25 years. @Ken_Buchanan expressed admiration for their personal R1100S model, highlighting its reliability and fun while riding. @rwantin fondly reminisced about the bike's comfort and performance, mentioning its good power and ability to navigate corners beautifully. @trailerjoe appreciated the bike's versatility, stating it's undervalued in the current market and provides excellent performance across various riding conditions. Overall, enthusiasts seem to find joy in the bike's design and practicality.
Neutral: There is a blend of informative comments regarding specifics of the bike and inquiries for verification. @TealTerror sought clarification on whether the model features non-servo ABS, to which @philinnc confirmed it does. There were discussions about the bike's age, specifically the tires' production year raised by @neugie, along with @TheObsidianCollection (The Seller) offering to replace them if the new owner prefers fresh tires. Comments also touched on the bike's features, like the original side bags and the color's match to the gauge, with the owner replying to questions and sharing additional insights about the bike.
Negative: Some concerns were expressed about maintenance and potential issues. @Ken_Buchanan inquired about the clutch slave cylinder's replacement, worrying that if it starts leaking, it could lead to more significant problems with the clutch plate and shaft seals. @neugie asked specifically about the age of the tires, likely reflecting concern over safety and performance. While no negative comments about the bike’s riding quality were made, the focus on potential mechanical issues indicates a need for buyers to be vigilant about the motorcycle’s history and condition related to maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the car, highlighting its nostalgic value and design. @boratdi appreciates the classic 90s Benz color, stating it beautifully represents the era. @Boatymcboatface praises the performance of the 600 coupe, noting it as the best driver-focused M120 chassis. @ColoradoGuy1 emphasizes the reliability of the M120 engine and describes the vehicle as a well-cared-for beauty, contrasting it favorably against modern offerings from Mercedes. Notably, @dpblues2000 (The Seller) reassures potential buyers about the functionality of key systems, including the ADS, and emphasizes the car's originality, further endearing the vehicle to viewers.
Neutral: A number of comments seek clarification on technical aspects of the vehicle. @Rockster80 and @Lubedude1 inquire about the ADS system, showing a keen interest in its functionality based on past issues. @antonvt cleverly notes the unique combination of the V12 engine with a four-speed gearbox, asking about maintenance history regarding the gearbox oil. @dpblues2000 (The Seller) provides a thorough response, discussing service history and documentation related to the vehicle, including transmission servicing at 33k miles, thus maintaining transparency with potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns related to technical reliability are also voiced in the thread. @Lubedude1 and @ColoradoGuy1 discuss the known issues with wiring harnesses in older models, expressing apprehension about potential failures if not addressed. Additionally, @ColoradoGuy1 mentions specific components like the vacuum pump and locking system that could be problematic in other W140 models. Meanwhile, @antonvt raises questions about the complexity of the V12 engine and its associated parts, indicating the possible difficulties in sourcing replacements for any potential issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Tripledigit describes the Impala as a stunning vehicle, specifically appreciating its 4.11 rear end spec for impressive acceleration power. @Dollycat3 shares their absolute love for the car, calling it "sweet and stock" and highlighting its exceptional features. @gafitts brings attention to the rarity of the original 400 hp 409 engine, noting it may be better to revert to the original single four-barrel carburetor for authenticity. There's overall admiration for the car, with @Smm7100 expressing interest in seeing a cold start and driving video before bidding, while @boaboyoz praises the wonderful build of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters reflect on the nostalgia associated with the 1963 Chevrolet Impala, including @62impalaboy who highlights the varied engine options available at the time and the significance of the model year. @Grayt64 offers practical feedback on some aspects of the car's repaint, pointing out that certain parts should not have been painted. @speedyskippy (The Seller) responds to inquiries posted in the comments and plans to upload a cold start and driving video, showing engagement and transparency with potential buyers.
Negative: Some negative comments hint at potential modifications that could detract from the car's originality, like @gafitts suggesting it would be better to revert from dual quads to a single carburetor, while @Noisyboyz disagrees with this sentiment, suggesting it would ruin the connection to the iconic Beach Boys song that celebrates the dual quad version. @Jenesaisquoi raises a question regarding the authenticity of the listed modifications, which could confuse potential buyers about the vehicle's original condition. A few users recount personal experiences with the 409 engine and hear about possible mechanical failures, which may create apprehensions among buyers concerned about the car's reliability.
![]() |
Detroit Muscle–Built, 6.4L Hemi–Powered 1969 Plymouth Road Runner Hardtop 5-Speed
RM23H9E116624
Lot 219092
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @Beepbeep69 enjoyed the program about the truck, indicating a strong interest in the vehicle. They appreciated the number of brand new parts and noted the body appears to be solid, suggesting that there is value in the truck as it stands, despite personal preferences on aesthetics.
Neutral: @gracilism commented that the truck's 6.4L engine might operate similarly to older models rather than modern versions, while @gavm360 showed engagement by asking about the engine management system and later concluded that it may be utilizing a Holley Terminator, even noting an apparent American Autowire upgrade kit.
Negative: @Jeffctsvman pointed out the need for a side marker lamp, indicating an oversight in details. @Palmer01 raised concerns about the truck being driven only 50 miles since the build in 2022, which is unusual and might suggest issues. They also expressed frustration about the lack of communication from the seller, indicating that if they were more responsive, potential buyers wouldn't have to seek answers on their own.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @oxenreiter describes the vehicle as amazingly useful and surprisingly fun to drive around town, highlighting its positive attributes. @JDMcarsFL (The Seller) agrees with this sentiment, showing appreciation for the bid and noting the vehicle's enjoyable driving experience.
Neutral: @CarlP inquires about the vehicle's transmission and confirms that it indeed has a 4-speed automatic. @GRUMPYBAT comments on the speedometer accuracy, while @IndyCat clarifies that the vehicle's speedometer measures in KPH, explaining the readings to others without expressing a personal opinion on the vehicle's performance.
Negative: @Stgru raises concerns about a loud rattling sound observed in a driving video, suggesting it might be a problematic issue. The Seller, @JDMcarsFL, addresses these concerns by stating that there were no noises while driving and asserts that recent adjustments eliminated the noise, yet some skepticism remains about the initial issue.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments for its clean and impressive build. @Big_DaddyRL noted the stylish aesthetic with names like "Midnight Runner" and "Black Nasty" being considered, while @Fatalvenom appreciated the low-key yet well-done modifications, suggesting that the wheels would stand out more on an S550. @Jaylong also praised the car's appearance, calling the black color 'bada$', and @NVGT350 expressed admiration for the transformation of the vehicle, highlighting its current impressive status.
Neutral: The seller, @dmo06, provided several details about the car, including the absence of heat or AC, which was addressed in response to @fjfhh4k34f's inquiry. They also clarified that the vehicle includes an Edelbrock E-force 2300 supercharger kit, though it is not yet installed. @Iamnewatthis asked for additional specifics about the Coyote engine, and @dmo06 explained that it comes from a 2016 Mustang GT, clarifying the mileage and modifications made to it. Furthermore, the topic of smog compliance in California was discussed, with @Jumper_Herandon highlighting the challenges due to strict regulations.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the lack of heat or AC in the vehicle, as pointed out by @fjfhh4k34f, which might deter some potential buyers. The intricacies of smog regulations in California were also a point of contention, with @Jumper_Herandon and @funmoneypit indicating that modifications could complicate certification. Lastly, @funmoneypit questioned why the seller was willing to sell the car after just 10 miles of use, leading to speculation about potential issues, though @dmo06 explained that space constraints prompted the sale.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered positive attention from various commentators. @Shawh expressed enthusiasm about the car with comments like "Cool Shop good luck cool stuff 🏁🏁" while @MRSDENWERKS noted, "This is such a cool car!! The Rumbler is the perfect name too. GLWTA." Additionally, @couchflyer emphasized the appeal of the engine's sound, stating, "The sound of the engine at idle is worth the price of admission". @rustyray highlighted the historical significance of AMC's engines in drag racing, showing appreciation for the vehicle's legacy. Overall, commenters viewed the vehicle as a nostalgic and exciting option.
Neutral: There were inquiries regarding the technical aspects of the car, indicating a safety and performance focus. @jacko241 asked for details about engine internals, while @NateM1010 sought information about an additional cooling fan and potential rust issues. The seller, @easydean, responded to these queries by stating that the car had not suffered from significant rust, aside from surface rust, and confirmed that it runs cool under regular use. Furthermore, the car is noted as street legal where the seller resides, though it currently has open headers that may not conform to local regulations. This strives to clarify the car's state for potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the lack of bids on the vehicle, with @braktrcr expressing disappointment that the car "deserves more attention than it’s getting," given its impressive quarter-mile time of 11.18 seconds. @NateM1010 pointed out visible bubbles in the paintwork, questioning the condition of the rear wheel openings and the floor pans. @TopCop70 also mentioned a prior owner’s issues with the gas pedal, questioning why it had not yet been replaced, suggesting there may be some reliability concerns associated with the vehicle. Overall, while the car is praised for its unique qualities, these comments reflect valid apprehensions regarding its condition and market interest.
![]() |
1983 Porsche 911SC Cabriolet 3.3L Turbo Slant Nose Conversion 4-Speed
WP0EA0915DS170749
Lot 219094
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: The auction for the 930 Turbo Slant Nose Cab Conversion is being promoted enthusiastically by @AutofileClassics, who has underscored the extensive work put into the car to ensure it is in excellent condition. The vehicle is described as having been completely sorted with a high level of finish, making it ready for enjoyment and showcasing impressive performance. Each area of the car has been meticulously reviewed and detailed in inspection videos, providing potential buyers with valuable insights about its condition and history. The thorough efforts have yielded an impressively performing, show-stopping vehicle that is expected to impress viewers and bidders alike.
Neutral: @AutofileClassics frequently updates followers with detailed presentations of the car, including undercarriage shots and close-ups of various components. The seller describes the 930 Turbo's solid and rust-free undercarriage, attributing its good condition to its history as an Arizona car, further assuring potential buyers of its quality. The seller emphasizes transparency throughout the auction process, providing raw, unedited videos that give a comprehensive view of the car for those interested.
Negative: Despite the extensive work put into the vehicle, @AutofileClassics mentions that the cabin's interior initially needed significant attention, as it was described as tired and noisy. Issues such as rattling trim and wind noise from the windshield seal were problematic, which could potentially turn off some bidders looking for a flawless interior from the start. However, it's noted that all these issues have been addressed, resulting in a much more comfortable cabin experience at high speeds.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's warranty, with @dmason65 asking if it comes with a full factory warranty. The Seller, @1911nineeleven, assures that it includes a six-month factory bumper-to-bumper warranty, which adds a sense of security for potential buyers. Additionally, @1911nineeleven emphasizes that the same build would cost $53,170 if ordered today, suggesting that the current offer is competitive and presents good value.
Neutral: Potential buyers are also interested in viewing the vehicle in person. @99duelly inquires about its availability for a physical inspection, to which @1911nineeleven responds affirmatively, mentioning the location at Hubbard Auto Center in Scottsdale and the operational hours, showing transparency and accessibility for interested parties.
Negative: There are some uncertainties regarding the warranty timeline, as @DWRAT asks if the six-month warranty has already started. @1911nineeleven clarifies that it began on September 23, 2025, indicating a possible misunderstanding about the vehicle's warranty status that could concern potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @andrewdill (The Seller) expressed excitement about selling their beloved 2011 BMW 335i xDrive, which they have maintained meticulously since acquiring it in 2017, investing nearly $19,000 in maintenance and repairs. They highlighted their commitment to keeping the vehicle in excellent mechanical condition, detailing recent significant services that underscore the car's reliability and performance. The Seller described the vehicle as rewarding to drive and emphasized their emotional connection to it, noting the car's strong performance and smooth operation in their recent drives.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions regarding the car's history and current issues. @wrxsti87 inquired about the details of an accident prior to the Seller's ownership and the status of the A/C system, to which @andrewdill responded that they were unaware of the accident and confirmed the A/C compressor was seized. @Fartparts questioned the TPMS light, with @andrewdill suggesting a dead sensor might be the cause and confirming the vehicle has a clean title, addressing @Roger9111974's concerns about potential title issues.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the condition of the vehicle. @wrxsti87 specifically asked about the lack of information on the previous accident, which the Seller admitted to being unaware of until listing the car. Additionally, the issue with the A/C created questions about the vehicle's overall functionality. Despite @andrewdill's reassurances about the car's performance, these issues left some commenters apprehensive about the vehicle's reliability and history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 1993 Mercedes 600SL is highly regarded for its aesthetic and mechanical excellence. @Legend highlights the impressive Signal Red exterior and the well-cared-for condition, emphasizing the substantial maintenance history since 2013. Commenters such as @wakerdasha and @007CCIM commend the vehicle's seemingly bulletproof powertrain and the meticulous upkeep, noting that such comprehensive service records are a rarity among similar models. The car is described as a 'fully sorted' example ready for its next owner, with features like a well-functioning automatic climate control, convertible top, and heated seats all tested and working perfectly.
Neutral: There are discussions surrounding the vehicle's true mileage, with @MontanaOutlaw666 questioning the TMU (True Mileage Unknown) status due to the odometer change. @Legend addresses this concern by explaining that the mechanical odometer issues in early R129 models often led to replacements with documented service records. This transparency is appreciated, leading to a greater understanding of the car's history and condition. Additionally, the seller acknowledges some comments about the hood's position in various photos, clarifying that such discrepancies stem from angles rather than mechanical issues.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding potential mechanical issues, with @Markrhin mentioning a knocking sound observed in a video of the car idling. @Legend reassures interested parties that there are no mechanical problems with the vehicle, attributing the noise to the moving convertible top rather than engine performance. However, the interior headliner is sagging, and although the seller offers a replacement for $500, this detail may deter some potential buyers who expect a fully pristine interior. Overall, despite minor concerns, the car's solid maintenance record and servicing by a reputable specialist lend it a degree of confidence among bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle, a 2008 Aston Martin DB9 Volante, is presented as an appealing option for anyone interested in acquiring a modern car with a naturally aspirated V12 engine. @AuthenticAuctions (The Seller) communicated enthusiasm for the auction, emphasizing the extensive photo documentation available and inviting inquiries from potential bidders. Also, @Moe2635 appreciated the functionality of the car’s roof, indicating that it operates smoothly and is quite fast, generating positive interest among commenters.
Neutral: Responses regarding the vehicle have been generally informative, with @gmoney74 asking about the age of the tires and the last brake pad replacement, and @Regulator112 inquiring about the functionality of the navigation screen. @AuthenticAuctions (The Seller) actively addressed these queries, confirming that the tires are recent and the brakes were checked as fine despite an unclear replacement history. There were also requests for additional details like paint readings and functionalities, demonstrating a demand for transparency regarding the car's condition.
Negative: On the downside, the vehicle recently sustained damage as noted by @AuthenticAuctions (The Seller), who reported that the owner accidentally backed into the car, cracking the drivers' side fender. This has led to concerns raised by @Regulator112 regarding additional bubbling damage on the door that should be fixed concurrently with the fender repair. Furthermore, @ConquerCustom questioned the possibility of this incident being reported to insurance and its effect on the vehicle's Carfax report, adding skepticism to the ongoing auction and the vehicle's prior history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @coreyjenkinsnyc (The Seller) took action based on community feedback by adding undercarriage photos and a video from under a lift, as well as rushing a Marti report for further details. @funkaholik appreciates the inclusion of driver-quality cars in the listings, emphasizing that such options are important for enthusiasts who may not have the budget for high-value classics. Other users like @Cobrabitn highlighted the value of the Marti report, sharing personal experiences that demonstrate how crucial this documentation can be in enhancing the car's appeal and understanding its history.
Neutral: Commenters like @King60 describe the vehicle simply as 'Ruff and tuff,' indicating a mix of recognition of its potential ruggedness and a reminder that significant restoration may be needed. @Roadracer67 raises a question concerning the necessity of a Marti report for a standard Mustang coupe, suggesting that for some buyers, the existing conditions of the car may hold more relevance than the detailed historical data. Meanwhile, @jcbarne inquires about the car's history and previous ownership, showing interest in understanding its condition prior to the current listing.
Negative: Several comments reflect concerns about the vehicle's condition. @CarFoolLane notes signs of potential repainting at the trunk and suggests the need for more thorough inspections and photos, which reinforces a sense of uncertainty about the vehicle's overall integrity. The mention of needing a substantial investment to get the car running, as pointed out by @jcbarne, raises red flags about its maintenance history and could discourage potential buyers. Moreover, the ongoing debate about the necessity of the Marti report, notably from @Roadracer67 who dismisses it for this particular model, hints at a divide among users about the value of extra documentation versus the actual condition of the car itself.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors have expressed their appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and condition. @brucedwilliams finds the monochromatic color scheme of the Boxster S attractive, describing it as having a reserved 'teutonic' charm. @jwalker3122 praises the fun factor of the car, indicating great satisfaction with its value. The seller, @iAutoHaus, also shares that the Boxster S is a clean example and has been maintained in a climate-controlled facility — a major selling point highlighted by multiple interested buyers.
Neutral: Some comments revolve around technical queries and verification of the car's history. @55speedster inquires about the IMS bearing, while @jimmy1767 asks for clarification on the speedometer's display options and the car's ability to pass Canadian safety inspections. @animalhouse raises concerns about the vehicle's registration status in California, showing a practical interest in the logistics surrounding the purchase. The seller provides information addressing these concerns, ensuring clarity regarding the car's features and documentation needed for potential buyers.
Negative: There are several concerns raised about the car that may deter certain buyers. @jerrytaylo expresses disappointment over the absence of a second key while @Chakatum seeks confirmation about documentation like the U.S. DOT safety certification label, indicating hesitation in committing due to potential regulatory issues. Additionally, @SSpro queries if the IMS bearing has been changed, highlighting a common worry among prospective Porsche buyers regarding engine reliability. While these comments underscore doubts, the seller attempts to alleviate fears by confirming no IMS issues and responding to all inquiries diligently.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics described the 2014 BMW M6 Convertible Competition Package as subtle yet striking, highlighting its unique options and the impressive 37,000 miles on the odometer. The seller emphasizes their commitment to providing a smooth and transparent buying experience, noting their high Google rating of 4.9/5.0 and hundreds of five-star reviews from satisfied customers. They encourage potential buyers to inspect the vehicle using trusted local shops or services, demonstrating confidence in the car's quality and condition.
Neutral: The seller has acknowledged a mileage discrepancy reported by @BGZ, clarifying that they are working with Carfax to correct the error. They assert that this mistake should not affect bidding, as the vehicle's mileage is indeed around 36,000 miles, indicating that they are taking steps to ensure clarity for potential buyers. @sjcby raised a concern regarding the color match of the front bumper in one of the photos, prompting the seller to assure transparency and offer more information about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition have been raised by some commenters. @sjcby pointed out a possible mismatch in the front bumper's paint color, questioning whether it was due to lighting or an actual discrepancy. The seller is encouraged to provide detailed descriptions of any wear, especially on areas like the driver's armrest, to address these concerns. This suggests that there may be some uncertainty regarding the vehicle's cosmetic condition that could affect buyer confidence.
![]() |
2,800-Mile 2023 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat Jailbreak Convertible Conversion
2C3CDZC99PH573389
Lot 219107
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: @Paul6200 expressed strong enthusiasm for the Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat, noting it as a 'real deal' vehicle after owning a Scat Pack version. They praised the conversion done by DropTop and mentioned potential warranties for the top if ordered through the factory. @69Daytona shared their positive experience with DropTop, having a 2010 Challenger converted successfully, highlighting the quality of the work without squeaks or rattles, especially with the powerful Hellcat drivetrain. @123LLC referred to the vehicle as an 'absolute stunner' showcasing its aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Several users discussed their experiences with the vehicle and similar conversions. @TSR90210 and @gb70 conversed about issues accessing videos related to the vehicle, with suggestions shared for troubleshooting. @KevorkM raised a question regarding the structural integrity of the DropTop conversions, specifically about how they reinforce chassis without a hardtop, to which @69Daytona provided insights on the company's methods through their website. @Joe_Latshaw expressed curiosity about whether DropTop would facilitate an alternative conversion for better functionality of the back windows without compromising the roof.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns or issues. @SgtBeavis commented on Dodge's previous refusal to produce a factory convertible model and mentioned disappointing moments from the brand's history. @MoparSS inquired if the top is manual or power, implying a possible drawback depending on the nature of the convertible's operation. @KevorkM cautiously noted that many convertible conversions tend to lose stability over time, suggesting potential long-term issues with the vehicle's performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @XPeugeotDealer compliments the vehicle as a very nice example, expressing a preference for a 5-speed transmission. @ttocs6991 (The Seller) assures potential buyers that the low-mile Rubicon runs and drives excellently, highlighting its excellent hard top, cold AC, and that it has never been smoked in. Additionally, @TTocs6991 emphasizes the Jeep's pristine condition and readiness for new ownership, stating that it has been well taken care of, which is noticed by potential bidders.
Neutral: @MPETESS10 inquires about the functionality of the key fob remotes and whether the Jeep has power locks. @sneaky417 raises a concern about the condition of the rear frame, suspecting it may have been painted to hide rust, to which @ttocs6991 (The Seller) responds that the vehicle was treated with dry ice for protection, ensuring there is no rust present, only minor surface corrosion. @ExtremeTNS seeks additional information regarding the last service date and maintenance items such as brakes, fluids, and tires, indicating they are gathering comprehensive information before deciding to bid.
Negative: @trussdevils questions whether this was a smoker's vehicle due to the presence of wind protectors, prompting a defensive response from @TSMiller, who states their own experience as a smoker does not align with the presence of such features. @montymatt asks for more details about a reported incident, while @sneaky417 expresses skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition, hinting at potential concealed damage. Overall, these inquiries reflect concerns about the vehicle's past and its authenticity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous commenters highlighted the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, particularly praising its low mileage and attractive Aspen White color. @Dollycat3 expressed admiration for the brocade upholstery, while @Hoppy18 and @lincolnsandcaddies echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing their enthusiasm for the Cadillac's look and feel. @TheCritic noted the vehicle's authentic condition, suggesting that it is a preferable find over vehicles that have been tampered with, adding that its original features are worth appreciating.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions regarding the document fee associated with the vehicle sale. @Moneyfoot and @Hubris1982 expressed confusion and discontent about the fee, perceiving it as an unnecessary cost that detracts from the bidding experience. @gb70 and @mbuck sought more information about the vehicle's condition and history, indicating a desire for detailed responses from the seller to inform their potential bids.
Negative: On the negative side, multiple commenters criticized the high document fee, labeling it as 'fluff and greed.' @carfan1978 voiced a strong opinion that dealers should not charge fees on auction sites like this one and urged for policy changes. @Cougarxr71970 and @panscraper_deluxe echoed resistance towards bidding on a vehicle with a dealer doc fee, revealing frustrations over potential additional costs that may deter bids. @The Seller, @fferketich, acknowledged the criticisms but explained the fee's purpose, which did not mitigate the backlash it received.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @portraitmac called it the best driving video ever, reflecting excitement about the vehicle. @robertwichert finds it appealing and has ambitious plans for a body off rebuild and engine transplant, expressing a deep interest in enhancing its features. @brett_ humorously suggested the vehicle would be cuter than a golf cart for neighborhood driving, illustrating a light-hearted appreciation for its charm.
Neutral: @choicedealsnc2017 (The Seller) contributed most of the informative responses, confirming the vehicle started after a year of sitting and addressing questions about missing glass and additional photos requested by users like @shawn_m. The Seller also engaged with several comments, providing insights into the vehicle's current condition, including the installation status of the glass and future photo availability.
Negative: Some users had negative or skeptical remarks, with @1click2many joking that it would be a good first car for a 'least favorite kid,' suggesting a lack of confidence in the vehicle’s desirability. @FoxJohnFox flagged a response as non-constructive, implying that some humor might have been taken too seriously, prompting frustration about community sensitivity towards light jokes. Additionally, @henryd2021 raised a question about the vehicle’s classification, suggesting confusion regarding its identity as a motorcycle or car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @DEAUTOSINC expressed enthusiasm and gratitude towards the interest in the GLS 550, highlighting its exceptional cleanliness and low mileage. They emphasized the urgency as the auction draws to a close, encouraging potential bidders to stay engaged and refresh their browsers frequently for updates. Additionally, @DEAUTOSINC reassured bidders that they would assist with transportation logistics, making the purchase process smooth for out-of-state and international buyers.
Neutral: In response to inquiries, @DEAUTOSINC provided clear and helpful information regarding shipping costs, estimating approximately $500 for delivery to the 95818 ZIP code. They also confirmed that the vehicle has never been smoked in, ensuring that it is free from any unpleasant odors, which may appeal to buyers concerned about a vehicle's cleanliness and maintenance history.
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its exceptional condition. @fastandy mentioned the car being 'very clean' and a 'gem,' indicating excitement about its potential value. @Viperboi praised the timeless design, noting it was 'next level for the time.' Additionally, @Jozar11 commended the car's meticulous maintenance, sharing his own passion for collecting clean GSXs, showcasing a general appreciation among enthusiasts for this vehicle's rarity and quality. @Davisflyer and @maxd23 also reminisced about their past experiences with similar models, emphasizing nostalgia and fondness for this type of car.
Neutral: Several comments addressed the vehicle's desirability and the bidding process, with @nicajmar referring to it as the 'holy grail.' Commenters like @trojanman22 and @greenie3111 remarked on the implications of rapid bidding increases, indicating awareness of market dynamics without suggesting dishonesty. Meanwhile, @bouldercars (The Seller) provided details about the car's history and maintenance, sharing insights into the vehicle's care from its previous owner, which helped contextualize its current auction situation.
Negative: Some skepticism was evident among commenters, with @trojanman22 expressing doubt about bidding integrity due to sudden jumps in prices. @maxd23 noted the limitations of older vehicles compared to modern cars, hinting at a sense of practicality over nostalgia. There were also concerns about the pressure of escalating bids and a recognition that while the vehicle is in excellent condition, it may not match the performance standards of today's more advanced vehicles, indicating a divide in expectations between collectors and everyday practicality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Joe_from_Jersey enjoys the car's uniqueness, calling it interesting with a big personality. @porkpiehat highlights the engineering excellence of Panhard, while @pat356jones praises the owner's impressive collection of cars. @gh356 and @snafuracer appreciate the car's sporty feel and aesthetics. @Paul_B shares his extensive knowledge about the vehicle's history and features, noting its potential for joy, and @RedRacer10 believes the car is much more impressive in person than in photographs. The Seller, @autospa, engages positively with commenters, sharing informative videos related to the vehicle.
Neutral: Comments also express curiosity and provide additional perspectives about the vehicle. @LLynn asks if the car's previous literature is included in the sale, while @TheOMDude discusses historical aspects of the Panhard design and engineering. @SeanAlain recounts an interesting story about the windshield wipers, and @Beyfon mentions personal anecdotes regarding Panhard’s history in his family. The Seller clarifies inquiries about certain features and updates the audience on the vehicle's maintenance status, emphasizing engagement with potential buyers through informative exchanges.
Negative: However, some concerns are raised about the car, particularly regarding a potential leak that @Joe_from_Jersey pointed out. @Paul_B raises issues on the accuracy of parts and functionality. The Seller acknowledges these concerns and assures that the vehicle is being looked into for any issues, like non-functioning brake lights. @djimbe expresses skepticism about the car's mechanical complexity, pondering if he possesses the necessary skills to maintain such an advanced vehicle. Despite the challenges mentioned, the overall sentiment remains respectful and curious.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @hgtorres (The Seller) confidently states that the cold start video was intended to showcase the car's sound, claiming it to be the best sounding coupe on the market. Additionally, he emphasizes the car's power during a demonstration drive, mentioning that the speed limits in Texas are merely a suggestion. He reassures potential buyers that insurance has covered repairs related to minor incidents involving potholes and a fender bender, implying that the car has not sustained any significant accidents.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions about the vehicle's performance and perceived value. @Z282SLO points out that the car is a first-year Giulia QV, expressing regret over some cosmetic issues like road rash on the wheels but suggesting these can be repaired. @grumpyoldman and others debate the sound and appeal of the car, indicating a mix of opinions on its features. The comments reflect varied interests in the car's aesthetics and driving experience rather than outright depreciation or glorification.
Negative: @grumpyoldman and @leightoncutler express clear disappointment in how the car was revved during the cold start, indicating lack of mechanical sympathy, which led @leightoncutler to lose interest in the vehicle. @Jeepmike raises concerns over the vehicle's maintenance history, highlighting a long interval since the last oil change, which he notes could deter buyers. @Tommyboy1253 asks pointed questions about maintenance-related issues, specifically regarding the drive belt and the rear passenger seat condition, signaling potential worries from prospective buyers about the car's upkeep.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Tudor303 praised the vehicle, highlighting its appealing features including the color, tires, wheels, and overall stance, stating it has all the right elements for a great drive experience. @rofandofy remarked on the impressive build quality and the expense involved in its construction, while @Corndogcholo expressed his excitement over the LS6 engine, calling it 'absolute perfection' and noting he's been searching for a vehicle like this for a long time.
Neutral: @Hoppy18 acknowledged the car's appeal but humorously mentioned he doesn't possess the skills to claim ownership based on his experience with assembling IKEA furniture. @Teds200, the seller of the vehicle, responded to inquiries about the car's features, confirming it has power steering but lacks air conditioning and power brakes, which is pertinent information for potential buyers. Additionally, @Chris381 sought clarification on these features as part of his interest.
Negative: @marc3909 questioned the reason for the sale so soon after purchase, which could imply concerns about the vehicle's value or condition. @BONJOVI508 corrected a detail regarding the LS6 engine specifications, suggesting a misunderstanding about its performance characteristics. This exchange reflects potential confusion about the vehicle's features among prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle seems to have a well-regarded engine, as the seller, @dannok, mentioned that it runs great and is free of leaks. The engine is believed to be a crate 350 installed prior to the seller's ownership in 2014, which provides some assurance about its performance. The seller is also open to providing additional pictures, indicating a willingness to engage positively with potential buyers.
Neutral: There are inquiries about specific features and noises associated with the vehicle. For example, @johnnpaint asked about the engine's age and previous usage, while @Rynomill inquired about a high-pitched whining sound heard in the videos. @dannok addressed these queries by clarifying that the noise may be due to a gasket on the pop-out vents and that the vehicle can run at highway speeds of 60 mph without problems, although he was unsure about the torque splitter's impact on higher speeds.
Negative: While the seller has provided some reassurance about the vehicle's engine and functionality, there are still unanswered questions that may concern potential buyers. @johnnpaint's request for more detail regarding the engine's history and @Rynomill's question about the odorous sound suggest that there may be lingering uncertainties about the vehicle's overall condition. The need for more specific answers could deter some interested parties.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Overextended exclaims that this vehicle is "amazingly fun," highlighting its appeal as a thrilling ride. @35Woodie (The Seller) emphasizes the quality of the car, stating that it is a wonderful example with many added features and upgrades performed by an expert. @kansaspaul appreciates the uniqueness of the Morgan 3 Wheeler, noting its combination of vintage style and artistic engineering. He praises the car's understated and tasteful design, showcasing its character as a standout in the automotive world. Additionally, @BravoZulu02840 mentions the extensive upgrades that enhance the vehicle's reliability and maintenance, further underscoring its value for the next owner.
Neutral: @35Woodie (The Seller) provides important details about the vehicle's maintenance, mentioning that a new AGM battery and an oil change were recent updates. He also responds to @thmacallan's inquiry about heated seats, confirming that the car does not have this feature. @hankgiffin wonders about the fit for taller individuals, while @35Woodie (The Seller) humorously addresses this concern, suggesting it may be a tight fit. The interaction among commenters, including encouragement for bidding from @35Woodie (The Seller), indicates a friendly and engaging atmosphere for potential buyers.
Negative: @BravoZulu02840 points out a potential concern regarding the stock exhaust system, which may need upgrades for improved performance. This issue is mentioned alongside the suggestion that the standard setup is restrictive and could lead to sluggishness. Additionally, some commenters notice that the vehicle lacks certain features, like heated seats, and makes suggestions for further enhancements, indicating that while the car is well-regarded, there are areas where it might fall short in meeting every buyer's preferences.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @JAY-Z praised the vehicle as the closest thing to a present-day 2002 offered by BMW. @Mgh20180 expressed enthusiasm for the car's appeal as a great driver's vehicle, and mentioned a desire to own one someday, specifically liking the understated white color. @Fletcher331 shared their satisfaction with their own similar vehicle, stating that it is practical for everyday driving as well as track use, and wished the seller well with the auction, reinforcing confidence in the car's desirability.
Neutral: @Jleviathan (The Seller) responded to inquiries with detailed explanations, indicating that they planned to create a new engine startup video after feedback on the initial one where the engine was already running. They mentioned registering the car as non-op to save costs during the decision to sell. They also clarified that a smog check had been completed when the car was brought to California from Washington and that the next one would be necessary once the car reaches 8 model years.
Negative: @Wrightguy questioned the car's non-operational status and the reason for not having been smogged for five years, suggesting concerns about its registration and compliance. @golfmanbob noted a lack of bids in the auction despite the vehicle's listing duration, indicating a potential issue with interest or visibility in the auction process. @UBMotorCo expressed confusion regarding the California title requirement and inquired about the extent and shop of the rear repairs indicated in a Carfax report, hinting at worries over the vehicle's accident history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @shoppy called the car a pretty car, while @roblamun referred to it as a beauty, inquiring about the tire dates and last maintenance. @jcole shared that if a '53 Stude is the prettiest car ever, this should be #2, highlighting its stunning color combination. @billyblyth praised it as a well-sorted example, admiring the polished engine and style of the car. @boaboyoz echoed the sentiment, calling the Series I XKE stunning, while @TheOMDude reflected on fond memories of past E-Types, indicating the car's nostalgic appeal. Overall, many comments praised the car's classic beauty and well-maintained condition.
Neutral: @DetailDave raised questions about whether body damage was present and pointed out aspects needing correction, such as a hole supposedly visible in the rear fender. However, @TKC_MN clarified that it was a drain hole and reassured potential buyers that this is indeed a true Series 1 car. Various users, including @oldcanuck and @martybrin, asked about the technical details of the engine and restoration, trying to understand its originality. There was also a query regarding a sound heard during the cold start video, which @LonV and @davidxk speculated about, referencing the modifications made to the fan wiring.
Negative: A few comments expressed skepticism about the car's condition and modifications. @DetailDave questioned the wiring and potential issues with the cooling fan, suggesting it might indicate problems, while @martybrin and @Kinglaw joked about the possibility of fluid leaks. @davidxk emphasized the need for proper modifications regarding the fan's wiring to prevent undue strain on the engine components. These comments highlighted concerns some potential buyers may have about this classic vehicle, despite the overall positive reception it received.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @stugottz highlights the vehicle's unique features, particularly its dual-range transmission which offers versatile performance; it behaves like a hot rod in low range and a cruiser in high range. The seating position and handlebar placement are praised for providing an extremely comfortable riding experience. Overall, there is a strong impression that the bike is ready for any adventure on the open road.
Neutral: @Djestic77 (The Seller) provided thorough details about the bike's tires, confirming they are Challenger by Kendra and of a recent vintage, suggesting they are in great condition for riding. There were inquiries from @HondaBike regarding the actual mileage of the bike and if the speedometer had been replaced, to which the seller responded with confidence in the originality of the claimed 8000 miles. The discussion also clarified the transmission specifics, indicating it is shaft-driven with a unique 10-speed setup, appreciated by several commentators.
Negative: Concerns were raised about possible engine noises, as noted by @wood1565 who mentioned a knocking sound during the cold start video. There was an observation about the lack of shipping information, as highlighted by @Mlowe48, which could complicate the purchasing process for interested buyers located far from Maryland. Additionally, @jpk928 brought up the potential complications with shipping due to unspecified spare parts, indicating possible challenges for buyers not local to the seller.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 2014 Porsche Cayenne Diesel is highlighted as an exceptionally clean vehicle, both mechanically and cosmetically, with no known issues. The seller notes that it comes equipped with desirable features, including a rare adjustable suspension, which enhances its appeal. They encourage potential buyers to reach out with any questions and assure them that the car has been maintained in excellent condition, promoting confidence in the bidding process.
Neutral: Some commenters are intrigued by the vehicle but are curious about the reason for its quick sale, with @nkawa noting that selling after just 3,000 miles raises eyebrows. @time00 asks for clarification regarding the urgency of selling, suggesting that potential buyers might want further information on its history and usage. Additionally, requests for detailed photos, such as the interior of the coolant expansion tank and the upper console, indicate that buyers are looking for more insight before making a decision.
Negative: Concerns about the quick sale of the Cayenne emerge from commenters who question the rationale behind it. @nkawa and @time00 express skepticism about the seller's reasoning, thinking that a short ownership period may indicate potential problems. Furthermore, there seems to be some demand for specifics that may not have been readily available, which could lead to hesitations for some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its stunning 'Black Oak' color and clean appearance. @cpa713 states that the car is a "stunning super rare color" and suggests that it would sell itself in direct sunlight. @Zmaninarland also compliments the color, reinforcing the aesthetic appeal of the EOS. Furthermore, @dzeldin, the seller, provides reassuring information about the vehicle's maintenance history and service records, indicating that the car has been well cared for with low mileage and regular servicing at a VW dealership.
Neutral: Several inquiries are made regarding the vehicle's features and functionality, showcasing potential buyers seeking additional information. @Section10-289 asks for details on the leather-wrapped steering wheel cover, expressing interest in its condition and requesting a photo of the uncovered wheel. @SuryaBandari requests a video of the convertible feature to confirm that the top operates smoothly, which the seller promptly provides. @justpaul inquires about trunk space when the top is down, indicating a curiosity about the practicality of the vehicle.
Negative: There are some concerns raised regarding the age and condition of the tires. @abscars expresses confusion about whether the tires are the original ones that came with the car, suggesting a potential hesitation about their safety and performance due to age. @dzeldin clarifies that all tires were manufactured in 2017 and reassures the commenters that despite their age, they have been minimally used and are in good condition. Nevertheless, these comments indicate that the condition of the tires is a point of concern for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @carguy_1967 (The Seller) mentioned that the rear suspension and mounts are in great shape, which is a positive note for potential buyers concerned about rust issues. Additionally, @GXguy470 suggested that a lamb’s wool oil treatment would be all this little Element would need to last a long time, indicating confidence in the vehicle's longevity.
Neutral: @m2711c expressed that the vehicle would be great for skiing if the AWD didn't cut out above 30 mph, highlighting an aspect of the vehicle's functionality that could be improved upon. @shoggy1970 pointed out that the vehicle has low mileage at 77k and, despite concerns about exposure to salt road driving, it likely runs fine and is due for typical major service, suggesting it remains in serviceable condition with routine maintenance.
Negative: @Papa_Oscone raised a concern about the susceptibility of rear suspension mounts to rust, which potential buyers should consider. Similarly, @shoggy1970 noted the unfortunate consequence of salt road driving without much attention to the vehicle's underside, suggesting that buyers should inspect carefully to assess any potential damage. @RJRambler questioned whether the car comes with a fresh MA inspection sticker, indicating there may be uncertainty regarding the vehicle's current condition and roadworthiness.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle, highlighting its performance and competitive nature. @Kromkreb noted that it is a fun car, suggesting that it could be very fast with the right driver, while @Super7Driver shared their thrilling experience of riding in the car, feeling it was faster than their own vehicle. @ncrosty emphasized its capability as a proven race winner, praising its reliability and versatility, encouraging potential buyers with the promise of racing fun.
Neutral: The seller, @Bubbasev, addressed questions and concerns from potential buyers and clarified various aspects of the vehicle. They acknowledged the car's limitations, such as the difficulty in adding a top or tonneau cover and mentioned the car's well-maintained history, including regular oil changes. They also provided details on the car's features, including adjustable pedal controls and the condition of its drivetrain, assuring bidders of its reliability for racing or casual use.
Negative: Some comments expressed concerns over comfort and fit, particularly for taller drivers. @cshowe, who is 6'6", worried about fitting comfortably in the vehicle, highlighting previous issues with legroom in similar cars. @Robert8198 brought up negative commentary surrounding the original manufacturer, suggesting its business practices were less than reputable. Additionally, there were concerns about wind buffeting and overall comfort during the driving experience, which some found to be part of the car's charm but could deter others.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @japans2k praised the vehicle for its low mileage and excellent condition, emphasizing that it has lots of life left and is well kept in its original form. @rmwcali (The Seller) highlighted the car's exceptional cleanliness, with original paint that shines as if it were new, and noting it has zero rust or oxidation. They also mentioned that the vehicle is equipped with all original keys and fobs, has a clean Carfax report, and comes with a set of Michelin tires that are in great condition, showcasing the overall high quality of the Honda Element.
Neutral: The comments from @Cgebhart and @VINROOKIE71 raised questions regarding maintenance records and recent service history, which @rmwcali (The Seller) addressed by confirming that all service records are available on Carfax. @elrod inquired about the tow hitch wiring, to which the seller responded that the hitch is not wired for trailer lights but can easily be converted at a low cost. Other comments express interest in inspecting the car and the potential for bidding, showing a general curiosity from potential buyers.
Negative: @mrpotty expressed concerns about the appearance of the passenger side tail light, noting it appeared rippled in images, prompting clarification from @rmwcali (The Seller) that the original tail lights are in flawless condition. However, no other significant negative comments were made about the vehicle, suggesting a generally positive reception overall. The conversation also hinted at a strong interest level from viewers, despite navigating typical auction questions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the vehicle, emphasizing its stunning appearance and historical value. @Nickv09 called it a 'sweet combo', while @PipeTabac expressed enthusiasm cheerfully noting the striking red exterior. @justused (The Seller) proudly shared the truck's rich history, detailing its one-family ownership since 1967 and the meticulous restoration it underwent, framing it as a rare and beautiful example of a 1967 Chevrolet C10 CST.
Neutral: Some commenters noted specific details about the vehicle without strong opinions, such as @Zpainter's comparison of the truck's color to tomato red and @mhirschler12's lighthearted remark associating it with a 'Christmas Parade'. @Towman86 suggested possible aesthetic enhancements that could further elevate the truck's appeal. Additionally, @67COOP inquired about any functionality issues, showcasing an interest in the truck's operating condition, while @justused (The Seller) confirmed the radio was malfunctioning but assured that everything else was in proper working order.
Negative: A few comments carried slight concerns or skepticism about the sale process. @Mordizzle and @hairyolds questioned the truck's price point and timing in the market, suggesting it might not fetch a higher bid based on previous results. @hairyolds expressed doubt about the vehicle's success in a fast-paced auction environment, reflecting a sense of caution about its sale. Overall, while the vehicle garnered a lot of positive attention, there were hints of uncertainty regarding the auction scenario.
![]() |








































































































































































