Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: Several commentators expressed admiration for the vehicle, with @hymanltd describing it as an exceptional 1954 Arnolt-Bristol Bolide, boasting factory team racing history and a stunning design that combines Anglo-Italian craftsmanship. @HELIDR recalled their youthful encounters with these cars, reminiscing about the beauty of the vehicle. Likewise, @DJB1111 shared heartfelt memories about their experiences with the model, mentioning the joy it brought to him and his father, highlighting its uniqueness and vintage allure.
Neutral: Other comments provided informative perspectives about the vehicle without strong feelings either way. @Mordizzle noted the description of the vehicle as a convertible might be more accurately termed a 'roadster'. @eurocol reflected on a past experience with a similar vehicle, acknowledging both its attractive characteristics and some shortcomings in appearance, yet praised its performance and comfort while driving.
Negative: Conversely, some comments revealed doubts and criticisms. @Knuckles-R-Busted humorously compared the car's cover shot to a pedal car, implying a lack of robust appearance. Similarly, @hymanltd encountered some negative feedback about the vehicle being overly picturesque, leading to skepticism about its actual driving experience, with a user feeling the design might not be for everyone, despite acknowledging its rarity and excitement.
 |
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the unique appeal and beauty of the vehicle. @Kishote describes it as a very special car, referring to it as an FNA press vehicle and suggests checking out a YouTube review by Matt Farrah. @AaronCCG expresses gratitude for the mention and shares a link to the video. Others, such as @alfriedesq and @GDogg, complement the vehicle's striking color and specifications, while @storm33 calls it a 'true dream machine'. @Last_Roadster appreciates the hope that this car will be owned by someone who will enjoy it long-term and praises the options that enhance its desirability.
Neutral: Several comments raise questions or provide additional context regarding the vehicle. @TheBland inquires about the in-service date and extended warranty, to which @AaronCCG responds that he doesn't have paperwork for the warranty but confirms that the car is covered in PPF. @bluesrocker asks whether this model is a successor to the 599, and @sudavik, a former owner, clarifies that the car is unique in its colors, stating that photos do not capture its true appearance. @Navalavaho expresses interest in seeing the car in person and requests a direct message from the seller.
Negative: There are some underlying concerns expressed in the comments. @Last_Roadster mentions a previous listing and indicates hope that this vehicle will be purchased by an enthusiastic owner who will drive it rather than have it sit idle. The conversation around warranty, service, and the car's specifications suggests potential buyers are cautious and seek thorough verification before committing to a purchase. Furthermore, some comments insinuate that the current market values might not reflect the car's true worth, as noted by @fandor, who contrasts it with another model potentially indicating variability in desirability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, emphasizing its cool factor and aesthetics. @Shawh referred to it as a 'wonderful example' that resembles a 'little hot rod' from Europe, while @buellwinkle and @992Turbo shared their love for the car's appearance and recognized its appeal with a Willhoit engine. @E30eric highlighted the expertise of the engine builder, John Wilhoit, suggesting that his touch improves the driving experience, and @CAL356 shared a personal account of enhanced enjoyment after modifications made by Wilhoit on their own vehicle. Furthermore, @slc2 (The Seller) noted the vehicle's honest condition, citing no significant rust or prior repairs as evidence of its well-maintained history.
Neutral: Comments reflected a mix of opinions regarding specific features and modifications of the car. @JTTR1 raised a concern about the comfort level of the Speedster seats compared to stock Roadster seats, while @vincenz0 mentioned the luxury feel added by the carpeting versus the expected rubber floormats in a Roadster. @Greg0926 expressed curiosity about the long-term reliability of the Willhoit engines and raised questions about possible issues over time. Several commenters noted that while the modifications could enhance performance, they may also influence the vehicle's overall value and collectability.
Negative: There were some reservations expressed about the vehicle's modifications and originality. @Jb007 pointed out a discrepancy between the COA and serial number, leading to questions about the car's authenticity. @cando raised similar concerns, inquiring whether the vehicle had undergone any body panel replacements or floor repairs. @JTTR1 also hesitated about the value of the upgrades made to the vehicle, indicating skepticism about how they might affect the collectability of this classic Porsche. Overall, some commenters were cautious about the implications of these modifications on the car's historical significance.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle's impressive build quality and racing capabilities. @johnbennett103 describes it as a 'beast of an engine,' while @dennisb40 calls it an 'awesome car.' @bobby.is.rad appreciates its recent build, and @onedaysomeday expresses admiration for cars that are bought, built, and driven as toys. @CZIGGT4 and @rossvesq both highlight the substantial investment in the car, with the latter stating that it is a 'very well sorted car.' @Profcarnut mentions how effective an in-car lap video can be in enticing potential buyers, indicating strong interest in the car's performance.
Neutral: Several comments provide technical context and insights about the car. @lcrain and @GoatFarmer discuss the car's minimum weight requirements and how they are calculated for racing. @AudictedRS (The Seller) shares details about the car's racing history, features, and planned upgrades. He acknowledges why the car is being sold, emphasizing its readiness for racing and lack of street legality. The seller also explains that various upgrades and components, such as new wheels and parts, will be included in the sale.
Negative: A few comments express concerns or a need for more information regarding the car. @1fastpizzaboy poses numerous questions about the car's condition, repairs, and various components, indicating a cautious approach to the purchase. Comments express skepticism about the documentation and specifications of parts, like the engine and strut repairs. Some users like @Gstracer inquire about the absence of a dry sump system, while others wonder about damage and maintenance history, which reflects a level of uncertainty about the vehicle's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its stunning French Racing Blue color and overall aesthetics. @Vtec4ever mentioned that despite not being a big Jaguar fan, the car is exceptional and unique. @ripper996 praised the aftermarket infotainment screen as the best he has seen, with professional fitting and superior functionality over the OEM unit. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, also emphasized the screen's seamless integration, climate control features, and performance, revealing it to enhance the vehicle experience significantly. Additionally, @john4surf shared his positive experiences with his past XKR-S purchases, underscoring the fun driving experience and lack of issues with the cars.
Neutral: Several comments seek additional information about the vehicle and its aftermarket features. @UKWyldcat inquired about the aftermarket screen's functionality and whether it could display temperature in Fahrenheit. @Mcassala questioned the cost and reliability of the aftermarket screen installation. @JUMPMASTER expressed curiosity about the functionality of the screen, noting it had been driven and had some scratches, reflecting the car's use. The seller actively engaged with potential buyers, stating that inspections and visits are welcome at their location. They also clarified that any perceived discrepancies in the vehicle's appearance in photos are due to angling, asserting that the vehicle is in excellent condition.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the aftermarket display and potential issues with the vehicle's original functionalities. @19PBK70 expressed apprehension about the reliability of the aftermarket screen, worried that a malfunction could disrupt control of essential features like GPS and HVAC. @Washmaster pointed out oil present on the exhaust, questioning the vehicle's condition and integrity. @BlueCar2013 and other users noted issues with the lower front splitter, pointing out that scrapes and damage are common for low-sitting vehicles like the XKR-S, which can be a significant maintenance consideration. Overall, while there is significant enthusiasm for the car, potential buyers are cautious about the aftermarket modifications and the inherent risks of owning a performance vehicle with such low ground clearance.
|
 |
Positive: @UBMotorCo and @Rockland expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's black and yellow color scheme, noting it has a certain appeal and nostalgia. The vehicle, which features painted trim reminiscent of late 90s designs, is highlighted positively for its vibrant aesthetics. @GhostSRT remarked on its pristine condition, while @cain720 pointed out the impressively low mileage of only 29 miles in the past decade, suggesting low usage may enhance its desirability.
Neutral: @BLEPLEY103 (The Seller) provided clarifications regarding several queries about the vehicle. They confirmed that the yellow trim is a 3M decal that may leave an adhesive residue, explaining that it can be cleaned off. Additionally, the seller answered multiple inquiries related to the car's history and condition, including details about the battery and maintenance records, while expressing a willingness to gather more information if needed. @deeyee08 also engaged with the seller about storage options and details about the vehicle's condition, reflecting a serious interest.
Negative: Some users have expressed concerns about the vehicle, particularly regarding the yellow trim which not everyone seems to appreciate, as exemplified by @onesicksupra's comment on the color's lack of appeal. @JoeJo3 and @Rguy questioned the potential for damage or issues related to the yellow highlights, with @Mblask8873 pointing out a possible problem with the driver’s side window not going all the way down. @fitisgo humorously criticized the dealership for not having adequate storage space for vehicles, suggesting a lack of professionalism.
|
 |
Positive: @TheOMDude praised the vehicle for its luxurious Carmel leather, expressing excitement. @s52z3mc mentioned that MY2k cars are aesthetically superior and emphasized the originality of the OEM black gauges. There was a sense of camaraderie among commentors as they engaged in a discussion about the gauge clusters, with @soanso acknowledging @s52z3mc's correction regarding the original specifications, which exhibited a shared interest in the accurate representation of the car's history.
Neutral: Several commentors inquired about the vehicle's condition and history, demonstrating curiosity without skewing positively or negatively. @JRGinCHS (The Seller) explained the incident that caused damage to the vehicle, showing accountability for the error. Others, like @Sweeney921 and @bimmersnob, commented on potential issues with the Service Engine Soon light and the emission control system, while others sought clarity on maintenance records and modifications.
Negative: Concerns arose regarding the vehicle's history, especially about its unibody damage and repair intricacies. @bimmersnob and @Mfer771 highlighted uncertainties about the SES light and requested further details about repairs and engine maintenance, which reflected an apprehension about the car’s potential hidden issues. Additionally, @Muddy2014 questioned the authenticity of ownership claims, suggesting confusion over ownership timelines, and some commentors expressed frustration with the seller's responses that they perceived as evasive or lacking detail.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Forest Green Metallic 911 Speedster, with @boaboyoz calling it "magnifique" and a "stunning specimen." @Dollycat3 referred to the car as a "fantastic deep dark Forest Green Metallic beauty," while @Tripledigit praised its specifications and stated they would have chosen the same options. Comments highlighted the rarity of the vehicle, with @JaguarRAG (The Seller) noting only four Speedsters were produced in this paint color, emphasizing its condition and previous ownership. Enthusiasts like @Vtec4ever celebrated its beauty and value retention, expressing pride in the Porsche heritage.
Neutral: Several comments sought additional information about the vehicle. @MOB1 asked for outdoor pictures, and @steven0401 inquired about the 'Special Wishes' options. @SpartyRob wanted to know about protective features like paint protection film (PPF) and ceramic coating, which @JaguarRAG (The Seller) confirmed the car does not have, stating it has very few transport miles. Commenters such as @gullwing71 noted that the vehicle could benefit from being driven more, suggesting it would not harm its value to have a few more miles on the odometer. @Gus1996 humorously remarked that it checks every box except for checking account balance, highlighting its high value and appeal.
Negative: Concerns arose with some comments, particularly from @NickG325, who shared a negative experience regarding the vehicle’s previous listings and the dealer's pricing. They pointed out discrepancies with the car's advertised price and the dealer's communication, leading to frustration despite ultimately purchasing another vehicle. The dealer, @JaguarRAG (The Seller), responded to clarify that the listing was removed due to the car being off the market and emphasized their commitment to transparency, although the incident raised questions about their business practices. Commenters like @Baldbear also expressed minor dissatisfaction regarding the center console design, stating it felt like an afterthought.
|
 |
Positive: @Submoose describes the driving experience of the vehicle as sublime, highlighting the strong presence it exhibits on the road. @Pettyfan43 admires the stunning white exterior combined with blue stripes, agreeing with @ACRSNK's sentiment that it is indeed a fine car. Multiple comments echo the appreciation for the vehicle, with @Art138 mentioning a personal connection as they own a similar model, and @RPM217 sharing the joy of driving their own Ford GT, suggesting that the next owner will also find happiness behind the wheel.
Neutral: There are a few inquiries regarding the car's condition and specifics. @C3_AG asks about uniformity in the color of the body panels and whether paint meter readings are available. @VinnieC expresses interest in seeing the car in person and asks the seller for an undercarriage photo, while @vettesandvipers lists several detailed questions related to the car's service history, paint condition, and interior, indicating a cautious approach to potential ownership and signs of thorough buyer due diligence around this prestigious model.
Negative: While overall sentiments lean positive, there are mentions of the vehicle’s mileage, with @wallyworld24 commenting that 4800 miles could be a point of contention for both low-mileage enthusiasts and those who prefer higher mileage vehicles. @2112's statement, "sell now, regret later," suggests a cautionary tone that might discourage a potential buyer from making the purchase. Furthermore, @C3_AG's concern regarding paint discrepancies hints at apprehensions over potential unseen issues that could affect value and ownership experience.
|
 |
Positive: @mef0629 expresses admiration for the vehicle, stating it's beautiful and that it couldn't be built for under $50k. @MtnMan87 shares their infatuation with the truck, feeling a strong connection as they consider it for a match with their own vehicle. Additionally, @tlcamg praises the condition of the Land Cruiser and anticipates that it will fetch a high price in the auction, highlighting its desirability.
Neutral: @Rjthomas01 (The Seller) addresses inquiries about the split rims by offering to connect interested parties with the previous owner, confirming their availability. He also clarifies that the cold start video may have given a misleading impression about the truck's starting time as it does not usually take long to crank. Furthermore, @Shawnkohan requests videos showcasing the vehicle's operational features such as lights, wipers, and driving capabilities, indicating interest in its performance.
Negative: @Chamba points out a critical detail, noting that the wiper motor cover is installed upside down, which may affect functionality. @johnnpaint requests images showing the rust condition under the carpet and plastic, indicating potential concern about hidden damage. Finally, @tinycar raises suspicion with their comment about the cold start video being taken in a parking lot, questioning the practicality of the situation.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed strong admiration for the vehicle, with @RHUDE describing it as a "beaut" and @Blewispost stating that they prefer this model over the 2025 TFC, calling it stunning. Additionally, @jw823_ (The Seller) agrees with the positive sentiments and emphasizes the vehicle's beauty. This alignment of opinions underscores the allure and aesthetic appeal of the vehicle among potential buyers.
Neutral: @jw823_ (The Seller) has responded to inquiries regarding the vehicle's service records, confirming that there are none available but noting that the selling dealer performed a full fluid change and installed new tires in February. Furthermore, @hegawn2 requested additional media to enhance the listing, leading @jw823_ (The Seller) to confirm that a video has been added and that they are open to providing more pictures and videos upon request.
Negative: There are no overtly negative comments presented in the discussions, as the interactions focus primarily on positive feedback and neutral inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and service history. Overall, the tone remains encouraging, with no evident criticisms from commenters.
|
Modified 2001 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am WS6 Coupe 6-Speed
2G2FV22G412129963
Lot 219519
Private Party
 |
Positive: @knotleykcorb described the vehicle as a collector's piece, praising its design and appeal. @stugottz commented positively on the Pontiac muscle, expressing admiration with strong emojis. Overall, there seems to be a strong appreciation for the car's aesthetic and heritage, with several users eagerly requesting additional content, like more cold start videos and driving demonstrations, demonstrating enthusiasm for the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Hurstolds1442 and @98WS6, raised valid questions about the vehicle, such as the camshaft specifications and whether the cold start video accurately portrayed the car's performance. @Flexfitness16 (The Seller) attempted to clarify points regarding the modifications made by the previous owner, indicating that some details might be limited due to the owner's passing. There are also inquiries regarding the vehicle's history and condition, showing an interest in understanding its technical aspects better.
Negative: Commenters like @Hurstolds1442 and @blackdak318 voiced concerns about the cold start video's accuracy, with @Hurstolds1442 questioning the temperature gauge reading. Additionally, @Motorbreath302 pointed out a discrepancy in the listing details, suggesting possible inaccuracies in the information provided. Some users, including @Daddystorm22, even reported technical issues with the videos linked to the vehicle, highlighting frustrations and doubts regarding the seller's credibility in presenting the vehicle accurately.
|
 |
Positive: @Cale8x (The Seller) has shared that this vehicle is the nicest driving old Ford they've owned, emphasizing the fun of the hydraulic clutch and Tremec transmission. Many other users, like @funkaholik and @BloodyHell, express admiration for the vehicle's features, including its solid GT package, 351 engine, and overall driver-quality condition. @PeachStateClassics and @Mr_wbt both note the car's appealing aesthetics, highlighting the rare burnt amber color and encouraging the seller with well wishes for the auction.
Neutral: Several commentators mentioned minor aspects that add intrigue to the vehicle, discussed the various options, and their perceptions of the car's modifications. @CarFoolLane speculated about the car's history, suggesting it could have been a dealer demonstrator due to its comprehensive options. @KAMZ shared a personal preference for the original burnt amber color while appreciating the vinyl roof, indicating differing opinions on aesthetics. @LH3726 and @PHXCarGuy posed specific questions about the vehicle's condition and features, showing interest in understanding more about the car.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about the vehicle's minor imperfections and modifications. @robGUE noted that the 351 engine and 5-speed manual transmission were essential features that contributed to the vehicle's value, while also being critical with a non-constructive comment. @drbvintage raised a potential issue regarding a noticeable whine in the drivetrain during a video, prompting seller @Cale8x to clarify that the sound is typical for a manual transmission. Additionally, @KAMZ and others suggested a need for some TLC on certain aspects of the car, indicating that while the vehicle is desirable, it may require a bit of work.
|
 |
Positive: @pleuralplexus provides a glowing overview of the Vespa 400, describing it as a completely restored, rust-free, museum-quality car that has drawn consistent admiration at car shows. He notes the car's comfortable size, even for taller individuals like himself, and highlights its well-maintained engine, rebuilt by a specialist in 2014. The seller adds that the car has ample parts availability and has been properly taken care of, emphasizing its fun driving experience and unique charm, which sets it apart from more common vehicles. Enthusiastic comments from @Calamari_Jujutsu and @VroomForTwo further emphasize the car's design influence and unexpected performance, making it clear that the Vespa car is both a novelty and a beloved piece of automotive history.
Neutral: Questions raised by potential buyers, such as @heiduschke and @Jimb0, indicate curiosity about the vehicle's performance and mechanics, particularly its speed, maintenance needs, and operational details. @pleuralplexus responds to these inquiries with clarifications about the car's top speed and oil usage, noting that while the speedometer reads up to 110 km/h, the real-life experience might differ. He also mentions that the car has an automatic oil feeder system but recommends a manual pre-mixing approach for optimal performance. This indicates a balance between the vehicle's playful appeal and practical concerns for potential owners.
Negative: Some comments, like those from @MarkS, reflect skepticism about the Vespa 400's practicality in American driving conditions and its overall durability, expressing doubt that such a small car could withstand long-term use, particularly in harsher climates. @Dphotos further implies that the Vespa car is not suited for many buyers, although they appreciate its preservation. Concerns are also raised about the performance vis-à-vis modern vehicles, casting a shadow on its reputation amongst more powerful and reliable cars, as mentioned by @AbnMike when referencing the performance capabilities of modern scooters compared to the Vespa.
|
 |
Positive: @Singerirv expresses excitement over the auction, indicating a lively atmosphere with his comment on popcorn. @Jags_in_the_barn appreciates the vehicle's aesthetics, describing it as a nice, usable roadster and showing interest in market response. @Rathertakearide and @bstonetr6 both highlight recent upgrades and modifications, praising the current owner's efforts in removing unnecessary parts to enhance the car's look. @USMCR6 describes the vehicle as a neat little XKE, even though he noted some physical accommodation issues due to size.
Neutral: @PetrolLounge (The Seller) responds to @Bj123's concerns about photography, clarifying that the dents mentioned are on the boot, not the bonnet. He also provides reassurance by stating that additional photos of specific areas would be shared, addressing transparency about the car's condition. Further comments reveal logistical details, such as the car's location in Austin, TX, and a clarification that the seller is a private party rather than a dealer, aiming to present the car objectively.
Negative: @Bj123 expresses skepticism regarding the car's presentation, questioning the choice of parking under a tree and the adequacy of the provided photographs, which may have been taken to hide imperfections. @67230sl points out potential issues with the car’s fit and finish, particularly mentioning ill-fitting rubber behind bumpers, which raises concerns about overall quality. Lastly, @Tigers196884 suggests that @Bj123's critique may be overly harsh, advocating for a more respectful dialogue amid the discussions about the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received several compliments regarding its appearance and upkeep. Commenters like @Dino886 noted its nice look, while @02fanatic praised the all-black presentation and well-cared nature of the El Camino. @rushgator2112 even shared their positive experience seeing the vehicle at events, suggesting that potential buyers would be happy with their purchase.
Neutral: Several inquiries focused on specific details about the vehicle, with @Todd_B asking about the rear axle specifications, including its factory Positraction and gear ratio. In response, @Vernonmcmillon explained that the original rear end includes a 273 gear ratio but does not have positive traction. Additionally, there were questions about the spare tire which @Vernonmcmillon clarified was not included, and comments regarding the mechanics of the heating system with @Classiccollector3777 inquiring about the steering tilt feature.
Negative: Some comments pointed out potential issues related to the vehicle's mechanics. @hasels expressed confusion about the heater air mix door not working, while @davidoliver inquired about spare tire arrangement. Although @Vernonmcmillon provided clarifications, the mention of labor costs associated with repairs as referenced by @Classiccollector3777 may indicate some concern about maintenance challenges ahead.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its aesthetic appeal and quality of restoration. @tim_t referred to the car as a 'very well turned out car' and acknowledged the effort that went into its restoration. @Mgrescueguy mentioned that they had seen the car at rallies, confirming its beauty and quality. The seller, @smartguy1014, expressed appreciation for the involvement of the Austin Healey community in answering questions and noted that the current owner was dedicated to restoring the car to its original form, highlighting the vehicle's craftsmanship.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the vehicle's description and authenticity issues. @jeepgeorge and @Astonjag raised concerns over the VIN number and engine specifications, suggesting discrepancies in the listing and original build details. @smartguy1014, the seller, responded to these questions by stating he would provide additional information, including a data plate photo. Overall, the conversation reflects an ongoing interest in clarifying the car's history and restoration.
Negative: Concerns were raised about discrepancies regarding the vehicle's VIN and original components, with multiple commenters suggesting the need for clearer documentation on the car's specifications. @jeepgeorge emphasized that the VIN did not align with the car's build date, while @monarch48 pointed out missing details such as rubber pads on the pedals, which could impact usability. Furthermore, @kwaz023 noted a potentially confusing reference to a 'wood block' related to the side mirror, indicating a need for further clarification on vehicle modifications.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle’s aesthetics and condition, with @davidhunternyc praising the stunning design and ergonomics, especially highlighting the tartan seats and the beautiful dashboard. @Dean_Laumbach loved the iconic Sacco Era design, stating, "LOVE THIS INTERIOR!!!" Additionally, @salty_dog referred to the car as gorgeous while looking forward to further discussions about it. The seller, @WAGroup, received compliments on the car's immaculate condition, with reports of no wear on the driver’s seat bolster and flawless cloth upholstery, making it a standout model among enthusiasts. Both @BloodyHell and @blklimo appreciated the modifications, particularly the manual transmission, considering it an ideal upgrade.
Neutral: Several participants were curious about the vehicle's history and mechanical aspects. @AnthonyJohn, @Jay_Gibbs, and @DakarYellow raised questions about the car’s bodywork, paint condition, and whether all electronics function properly. @Enchanter, the previous owner, provided insights about his past experiences with the car, including repair work that had been performed on it. They reiterated the need for further discussion on service records and documentation, which the seller acknowledged with assurances on the overall performance and maintenance of the vehicle. @MrcBnz55 contributed to the discussion by explaining the horsepower differences, helping clarify some of the mechanical specifications being debated.
Negative: Despite the overall enthusiasm, there were some concerns raised by commenters regarding the vehicle's bodywork and modifications. @AnthonyJohn and @DakarYellow emphasized the lack of comprehensive records, which led to questions about the car's history after previous damage mentioned by @Enchanter. This damage was described as involving multiple parts of the car, which raised some apprehensions about the integrity of the vehicle despite the repairs noted. @Brian289 expressed discontent upon learning of the past accidents, indicating a preference for transparency regarding any previous harm to the car. These concerns prompted further discussion on the significance of complete documentation and the impact of such factors on bidding and valuation.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the 991.2 C4S coupe as a "vision of ethereal beauty," highlighting its impressive Carrara White Metallic exterior and appealing color combination with Graphite Blue and Chalk. @Pattycakes shares a positive experience after a test drive, mentioning the car's flawless functionality and overall excellent condition, and points out that it seems to be a great option for someone looking for a reliable, story-free vehicle. @artpirate333 expresses admiration for the vehicle, specifically noting a preference for white 4Ss with black wheels, while wishing it had a few more options to be more appealing.
Neutral: @emonomics comments on the color combination, emphasizing its coolness but also observes that there are fewer photos than typical for a BaT auction, suggesting that additional visuals could enhance potential buyer interest. @Culbrz (The Seller) addresses a query about the car's history, clarifying that while the vehicle has had seven recorded owners, several of those are dealerships, making @Culbrz the fourth private owner. @jhauter expresses surprise at the number of owners, hinting at potential concerns buyers may have about longevity and maintenance.
Negative: @atsmmt raises a concern regarding the center console stains visible in the auction photos, questioning whether they are oily or just water, although still acknowledging that it is a very nice car. There seems to be an underlying apprehension about the vehicle's history, as indicated by the mention of multiple owners which could imply possible issues, as pointed out by @jhauter.
|
 |
Positive: @lucky12345678910 mentioned that the Jeep is very nice, clean, and low mileage, pointing out the condition of the undercarriage as a primary concern for experienced buyers. @allienjack also expressed admiration for the desert sand color and the cleanliness of the vehicle, noting that the half doors are a rare bonus. @SLCPunk supported the seller by stating that the vehicle looks great, commending the solid presentation and wishing everyone involved well.
Neutral: @StuartK provided information that a similar model recently sold at an auction for under $5500, indicating a potential valuation point for prospective buyers. @Toyotaforever (The Seller) reinforced the quality of the vehicle by stating that it was owned by a lady for its entire life and required only detailing after being retrieved from the tow company. @Toyotaforever also took proactive steps to gather more undercarriage pictures, demonstrating transparency and thoroughness.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, there were hints of skepticism about the seller's auction acquisition, with @mspaulding88 and @johnnyb11 both noting the previous auction sale as a great deal but subtly implying that a lower auction price could affect perceptions. @Hmcgraw10's offhand remark about seeing a similar vehicle does not directly reflect on the Jeep's condition, but may imply an expectation of commonality rather than uniqueness which could detract from its allure.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the exceptional qualities of the vehicle, with @BVN26 (The Seller) emphasizing its low mileage of 9,200 miles and high MSRP, making it one of the best examples of its kind. @Wildjrp96 notes the vehicle's likely popularity due to its impressive condition and features, while @cottrd expresses admiration, comparing it favorably to similar models, including their own low-mileage S65. @SimonTemplarVA appreciates its well-maintained state, with assurances from the seller that there are no leaks and it has never been smoked in.
Neutral: There are various inquiries and discussions regarding specific features of the vehicle. @NewN82 highlights a specific option of the elongated sedan and requests measurements to confirm its size compared to standard models. Several commentators discuss the car's options, including the Bang & Olufsen sound system, underscoring the vehicle's comprehensive features. @cottrd brings up the differences in rims between the S63 and S65 models, which sparks further conversation about design choices and personal preferences.
Negative: Concerns are raised by @armankhaz regarding the vehicle's condition, specifically mentioning previously warped leather and malfunctioning lumbar support. @cottrd expresses apprehension about the lumbar issue and requests clarity on whether it is fixed, showcasing potential maintenance concerns. @ivdjt shares past experiences of sunroof issues with earlier S63 models, hinting at possible reliability challenges. Additionally, there's speculation from @cottrd on the bidding dynamics of the sale, indicating a belief that prices might exceed expectations due to the vehicle's unique attributes.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous commenters express admiration for the vehicle, noting its aesthetics and features. @UBMotorCo simply states, 'Salivating. What a beauty.' @WagenGal adds, 'She’s so pretty 🤩,' which reflects the overall positive sentiment regarding the car's appearance.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) provides several details about the car's history and features. They explain that the car was once returned by a customer who enjoyed driving it but wanted something new. They also address inquiries regarding the vehicle's manufacturing date and IMS issues, promising to post additional pictures and information soon. Commenters like @Lesr3204 and @ACN968 inquire about specifics, highlighting the importance of transparency for potential buyers.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns about the lack of specific information related to the car's condition and history. @Lesr3204 raises questions about the absence of manufacturing date photos and speculates on why the car was returned. @BurningDinos requests more details about the engine number and expresses frustration at the Seller's initial response. These inquiries signal that while many find the car attractive, some potential buyers are wary about not having all the necessary information.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their love for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and unique characteristics. @Discobob described it as 'oh so lovely,' and @Davin referred to it as a 'Lovely Integrale' that tempted him significantly. @Preluder praised the tidiness of the interior and the design flair, while @SJBOTT also found the car beautiful and expressed a desire to own one. Additionally, @danielbruce shared positive experiences related to registering similar vehicles in California, noting that the G&K company could help federalize the car for California smog requirements, which is encouraging for potential buyers.
Neutral: There were various inquiries related to the vehicle's specifications and details that seemed to elicit neutral responses. Questions about the car's exhaust system, with @Tadek asking about the type of aftermarket exhaust installed and whether paint thickness readings were available, were addressed by @The_Carhunter (The Seller) who assured he would check for the requested details. Moreover, @Tadek confirmed he found the information he initially missed in the gallery, and @danielbruce reiterated how detailed information regarding the car could be found in the comments of previous auctions. This shows a proactive engagement from both buyers and the seller regarding technical aspects and vehicle specifications.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns or uncertainties about the vehicle. @raynekat suggested that the horsepower should ideally be closer to 200, indicating that there might be some dissatisfaction with the current specifications. Similarly, @Jwaldo inquired whether a specific rear spoiler was included, implying that some expected parts or features might not be present. Additionally, @turboki posed a question about the shipping and registration process in Croatia, indicating potential logistical challenges for international buyers. Overall, while most comments were positive, the few concerns raised highlight an awareness of potential issues related to specifications and the purchasing process.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the vehicle's condition and unique features, noting it's an excellent example of the legendary S4. @aspanglercs remarked on its impressive options and great shape, while @worf928 emphasized the car's rarity and significant history of restoration work, endorsing its unique status as a 5-speed model. @Nurburger shared their preference for driving the 928 over their 911s, admiring its solid and comfortable driving experience as well as the stunning aesthetics of the car. Multiple comments highlighted the well-documented history and maintenance of the vehicle, suggesting that it is a robust choice for potential buyers.
Neutral: Some comments inquired about the vehicle's actual mileage and the estimated cost to replace its dashboard due to a crack, raising practical concerns while acknowledging the car's overall beauty. @Dhayes asked for insights about these specifics, while others like @ahafiz89 (The Seller) assured potential buyers of their availability for questions and shared updates like the addition of videos showcasing the car's functionality. Additionally, a few commentors shared personal anecdotes related to the vehicle, indicating a community of passionate enthusiasts around the 928 model.
Negative: However, there were also critical observations regarding the vehicle, particularly focusing on specifics like the driver's side pop-up headlight's condition. @MaxSeven pointed out a potential problem with fogginess that @ahafiz89 (The Seller) attempted to address, asserting there was no actual issue with the lenses. @worf928 emphasized the difference between maintenance and restoration in the context of the vehicle's presentation, suggesting that while the car looks good, there may be nuances in the level of work performed that warrant a deeper analysis. Overall, while admiration for the vehicle is prevalent, there are also cautious voices reminding prospective buyers to look closely at specific details.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments showcase enthusiasm for the vehicle's aesthetic and comfort features. @Ried describes it as "65 tons of American Pride!" while @Baronvonbrutus calls it "one beautiful beast." @UNGN appreciates the comfort of the captain's chairs during long trips, which resonates with @AMK123 (The Seller) as they both emphasize the importance of comfort in long drives. The spirited engagement exhibited by @AMK123 (The Seller) in responding to inquiries and affirming positive feedback highlights a welcoming attitude and pride in the vehicle.
Neutral: Many users seek additional information about the vehicle's specifications and maintenance history. @Audifool and @jmerria2 inquire about the body/suspension lift and its height, respectively, while @WIZZZZ questions whether the A/C functions properly and if vital components like the transmission and transfer case have been serviced. @Smm516 provides perspective based on their previous buying experiences, emphasizing the importance of consistent maintenance even in the absence of a full service history. These inquiries and experiences reflect a thoughtful approach to evaluating the vehicle's overall condition.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns that point to potential issues or uncertainties regarding the vehicle. @aett8788 asks about any smoke or odors, expressing doubt about fabric wear in the photos, while @BubbaHo-Tep suggests further examination of a 'line' visible in the grill area, which he questions as a reflection. These concerns suggest a cautious approach among some commenters regarding the vehicle's condition and presentation, indicating that while the vehicle may be appealing, there is still a desire for thorough reassurance and transparency about its state.
|
 |
Positive: @UBMotorCo expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, referring to it as a "beauty". @Shawh complimented the color combination, noting it was highly desirable in that generation of Boxsters. @danbrown100 shared positive sentiments about the interior, indicating it sparked temptation to own the car. @FoMoCoBOB praised the driving experience of the 986 models, claiming they offer great value for money. @louist contributed by applauding the low mileage and classic color combo, emphasizing the car's reliability and enjoyable driving experience. @RonMan2 offered useful advice for preserving the plastic rear window, which adds to the positive feedback around the car's features. The overall sentiment about its classic look and driving experience was complimentary among reviewers.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics, acting as the seller, provided a comprehensive overview of their auction process and transparency practices. They highlighted their commitment to a smooth transaction and mentioned the various services they offer, such as nationwide shipping and inspections. @Hoodude raised queries about the IMS (Intermediate Shaft) bearing, seeking clarification on its historical performance and implications. @NewUpper questioned if all seat memory functions worked well, which is a common concern among potential buyers. @SixteenVentiler asked about the unusual low mileage for the car's age, suggesting it raises some questions about its usage. The comments reflect a mix of factual inquiries and generic observations without strong positive or negative bias.
Negative: Despite the predominance of positive feedback, some comments reflected concerns about the vehicle. @malloryross pointed out the costliness of replacing the spark plugs and noted the summer heat's effect on the car's plastic rear window. @mini33 and @Slylark98 raised worries about the absence of IMS updates, leading to potential reliability issues. @JakoVdL and @Mx7 expressed concerns over the degrading soft-touch interior plastic, which could detract from the overall ownership experience. These issues introduce a cautionary note among the otherwise positive reception, hinting at the potential pitfalls of owning an older model without significant maintenance records.
|
 |
Positive: @kellvette commented positively on the SS396 Chevelle, noting its authenticity after seeing photos of the matching transmission VIN. He praised the car's transformation from white over dark blue to dark blue over white, expressing enthusiasm and wishing the seller good luck with the auction. Both @bzbaz63 and @Dollycat3 agreed on its stunning beauty, with @bzbaz63 specifically emphasizing his preference for the 1968-1969 Chevelle designs. @JimmoVette also expressed admiration, sharing that his own 68 convertible is his favorite model, and @boaboyoz highlighted the excellent build quality and color combination.
Neutral: @tminer inquired about the car's history and any potential rust issues, which seems to be a common concern among classic car buyers. Discussions about paperwork followed, with @BeefedUp asking if the car comes with a proper title and registration. The seller, @BidRunner, provided detailed explanations regarding transferable registrations in relation to state regulations, addressing bidders' inquiries with professionalism. Many commentors, including @FullSizeL72 and @skydweller, shared experiences about registering cars from New York, emphasizing the similarities and requirements across various states.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the car's engine specifications and transmission compatibility, with @hooper questioning whether the replacement engine was the right horsepower as indicated. @pastafagioli suggested adjusting the exhaust tips for aesthetic purposes, which indicates a desire for optimal detailing. While @tminer appreciated the car's restoration quality, he asked about its rust history, and @ssterry pointed out that a miscommunication existed regarding the authenticity of the car's features, raising doubts that could impact buyer confidence. These comments suggest a mix of admiration and caution regarding potential ownership challenges.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle's aesthetics and condition. @Dollycat3 remarks on the Mustang's stunning appearance, emphasizing that it looks better than ever. @Mstang64 appreciates the attention to detail with the painted undercarriage, and @Spudster compliments the quality of the video presentation, noting the car's American-made heritage. @carchel (The Seller) expresses excitement about the convertible Mustang being a rare find, suggesting potential buyers will be happy with their purchase due to the car's quality and desirability. Additionally, @carchel highlights the unique colors of this Mustang, mentioning the appealing tan interior.
Neutral: Comments reveal a mix of technical discussions concerning the vehicle's specifications. @Mr_wbt and @Acorn19 clarify the engine types available for early Mustangs, with @carchel confirming that the 260 is indeed a V8, a fact that is supported by other commenters like @1966Girl and @eldonchas, who provide additional context about engine options and historical accuracy. @carchel shows appreciation for the knowledgeable members contributing to the conversation, aiming to ensure accurate information is shared. There’s also a mention of the vehicle’s title indicating low mileage, which adds interest for potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the positive reactions, there are some criticisms regarding specific details. @BillyJay points out that the engine color may not align with what is traditionally expected for the year, suggesting a potential issue with authenticity. @AKRunner counters with an argument about the engine configurations available during that production period, indicating a minor dispute among commenters about historical accuracy. Overall, while the auction and car are presented positively, the discussions reveal concerns about authenticity and technical details, highlighting the importance of clarity for potential buyers.
|
28-Years-Owned 1987 Chevrolet V20 Silverado Fleetside 4×4 Pickup
1GCEV24K9HJ164089
Lot 219533
Dealer
 |
Positive: @crownconcepts (The Seller) welcomes all inspections at their facility in Tucson, AZ, allowing potential buyers to make informed decisions. They emphasize that all vehicles are sold as-is with no warranty, while ensuring transparency in their representations. Additionally, the seller provides useful information regarding the bidding process and logistics, offering to handle taxes and paperwork for in-state buyers and arranging transport for out-of-state buyers, which adds convenience for bidders. The seller's enthusiasm for engaging with bidders and the auction environment is evident, creating an inviting atmosphere for participation.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed the vehicle's transmission, clarifying that it is an automatic 4-speed rather than the 4-speed manual that some had presumed. @autokak and @Hank03 confirmed its automatic nature based on their observations, while @Powerflow6 pointed out a common misunderstanding regarding terminology in this context. The comments indicate a collective attempt to clarify the vehicle's features, showcasing a knowledgeable community engaging with each other and the auction details, including an acknowledgment from @bringatrailer that they updated the listing based on the feedback.
Negative: Questions about the vehicle's condition also arose, with @Bboone33 inquiring about potential rust spots evident in the provided photos. @crownconcepts (The Seller) confirmed that there is some rust coming through in specific areas, indicating possible repair needs. Furthermore, @Bboone33's concerns about a potential gap in the door raised apprehensions over the vehicle's overall condition, suggesting that while the car may appeal to many, there are factors that buyers need to consider carefully before bidding.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed their admiration for this 2013 Corvette Z06, highlighting its rarity and specifications. @CJIIIFS noted its amazing appeal, remarking on the significance of the Z07 package, while @Nbeahan607 (The Seller) emphasized that this vehicle is among the rarest of the C6 Z06 cars, generating excitement for the auction. @deerej18 called it a "dream spec for a Z," and @hazer396 declared it the last 427 Corvette, reinforcing its desirability and unique features.
Neutral: Several participants in the comments have engaged in discussions about the technical specifications and features of the Z07 package. @Ronson68L78 noted that there was a window sticker miscommunication regarding the package's name, yet he affirmed its importance. Others sought clarification on the vehicle's specifications, such as @fer250gto asking about a dash reupholstery and @Bruno417 inquiring about additional options and variations. Although some questions arose about maintenance aspects, the overall tone showed genuine interest in the vehicle's details.
Negative: On the negative side, certain comments expressed frustration with the focus on less significant issues, like the condition of the heads and tire age, which @MartyZ28 found off-putting. Additionally, @positraction critiqued the assumption that low mileage indicated good health of the heads, implying that discussion could be overwrought. Overall, there was a sentiment that excessive nitpicking could diminish the appeal of the vehicle, as emphasized by @HotVette's comments about potential trolling by some users.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the exquisite aesthetics of the GTO, particularly its Mariner Turquoise color and overall stunning restoration. @boaboyoz referred to it as a 'gorgeous specimen,' while @Gettin_old noted the fantastic colors. @brew_man highlighted the appeal of the color combination, especially the addition of the red fender liners, expressing that the car looks sharp. @p1exotics, the seller, highlighted the vehicle's extensive care, including meticulous documentation and restoration efforts, which generated a positive view of the car's quality and heritage.
Neutral: Some comments pointed out the impressive aspects of the GTO while also urging for clarity on specific details. @Chevfvr raised inquiries regarding the reasons for selling the car despite extensive restoration efforts, and suggested additional outdoor photos for a better color perspective. @Schroeder observed the photos' darkness, particularly on the passenger side, indicating a need for better visibility in the presentation. Others, including @Fxnjetz56 and @JudgeGreg, shared mixed feelings about certain details of the restoration, while still acknowledging the car's high caliber.
Negative: Several commenters expressed concerns about the authenticity of the vehicle’s engine and details of the restoration, indicating that it may not be fully 'numbers matching.' @BaronVonZeppelin elaborated on discrepancies in engine stamping, arguing that the block had been restamped incorrectly — potentially misleading buyers. @fgh lamented over the seller's claims of originality despite the provided evidence, leading to doubts about the car's true value. Additionally, @Schroeder voiced skepticism about the clarity of the mileage and previous award conditions, suggesting potential uncertainty in the car's current worth and presentation.
|
 |
Positive: @borninthe60s praises the vehicle's beautiful Cabriolet design and superb color combination, emphasizing that the interior looks great. @gjr6725 shares a positive experience with their CLK, deeming it "BULLETPROOF" even after years of ownership, and mentions there are no issues in their 18-year-old car with low mileage. @Bartholomew_roberts agrees, noting they own a similar model with only minor issues, highlighting the importance of maintenance for performance.
Neutral: @hdarth (The Seller) responds to concerns regarding the condition of the soft top by confirming that the tear is visible in photos and that it doesn't pose a risk of water intrusion or function issues. The seller clarifies the presence of floor mats in the trunk and addresses questions about the ignition switch, indicating it was tested and found functional. The seller also provides reassurance that the TPMS light was a temporary issue due to temperature changes and that the vehicle comes with only one electronic key.
Negative: @Willbecca raises concerns about the cost of replacing the top and the absence of an additional key, suggesting these costs could exceed the vehicle's value. Other commenters, like @twistedcarguy, question the extent of the damage to the soft top and the potential costs of repair, while @Willbecca highlights risks such as possible damage from improper key usage. @Willbecca's further inquiries about the vehicle's prior theft status and whether it came with a valet key show skepticism about the vehicle's thorough history.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its unique aesthetic and desirability. @nexusautobrokers described it as "cool as hell" and noted the attention it draws at events like cars and coffee. @Handog74 mentioned a particular fondness for the wheels, finding them unique and visually appealing. @DetroitKerby (The Seller) reassured potential buyers that the car is a conversation piece and has been a cherished possession for ten years, suggesting that the winning bidder will be incredibly happy with their purchase.
Neutral: Several comments provided important context about the vehicle's background and specifications. @jacopelle offered detailed historical insights about the manufacturing of Bricklin vehicles, clarifying that the particular model in question was assembled from parts and not an authorized production vehicle according to the Bricklin Vehicle Corporation standards. This information was corroborated by other users, emphasizing the rarity and uniqueness of the specific VIN while also noting that such vehicles are sometimes referred to as "kit cars". @DetroitKerby (The Seller) affirmed the operational status of the vehicle's features, including the windows, but also acknowledged that they can occasionally come off track due to age.
Negative: However, there were concerns raised regarding the vehicle's authenticity and operational history. @Knuckles-R-Busted pointed out the potential complications that come with the VIN discrepancies, advising the seller to resolve these issues before completing the sale to avoid future hassle for the buyer. Additionally, @shelikes2race expressed frustrations over the driver's side window not operating perfectly, reflecting a common issue with older models. @davbert55 raised questions about the car’s registration, operation, and California smog compliance, pointing out the risks of purchasing a vehicle without clear clarity on these regulatory aspects.
|
 |
Positive: @addictedtojunk highlights that Cadillac has created an amazing car, emphasizing the appeal of the CT5-V Blackwing. @AZSkye adds that this particular model with minimal options can serve as a good entry point for enthusiasts who would like to experience the Blackwing without any extra frills, noting it could be beneficial for track purposes. @badcad also expresses satisfaction, referring to the vehicle as an 'absolute beast' and reinforcing the positive experience owners have with these cars.
Neutral: @thefleshrocket provides a detailed analysis of the vehicle's features, pointing out the absence of several upgraded options such as Carbon Fiber packages and additional driver aids. They describe it as a close approximation to a base model but suggest it still offers the essence of the Blackwing experience. @jax001 expresses interest in a base model with a manual transmission, indicating a preference among some buyers for a specific configuration, while @neverenoughgold comments on the potential fuel costs for low mileage drivers, which could influence ownership costs for some prospective buyers.
Negative: On the negative side, @Buy_Drive raises concerns regarding the tire replacement history noted in the Carfax report, questioning its accuracy. @dbennish seems to understand the situation but points out a humorous aspect regarding fuel expenses. Such sentiments might dissuade some from considering this model seriously, particularly if they prioritize thorough maintenance records.
|
 |
Positive: The Bentley Arnage Mulliner is praised for its luxurious features and serious attention-grabbing aesthetics, with users like @Dollycat3 commenting on its handsome and elegant design. @Euro_Classica (The Seller) highlights the vehicle's Mulliner specifications, such as rear seat storage, fold-down tray tables, and a fridge for champagne, all contributing to its reputation as 'the queen's Bentley.' The seller also reassures potential buyers about the vehicle's maintenance, asserting it has no rust and drives well, adding that a previous check engine light issue has been resolved after a gas cap replacement.
Neutral: Concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's ride height, particularly with @lz33w7 suggesting the rear appears too elevated, prompting inquiries about the possibility of independent adjustments. @snib65 underscores the need for more detailed undercarriage photos and has pointed out potential issues with the rear exhaust clamp's condition, while another user recommended discussing these concerns with experienced service providers. In response to various maintenance inquiries, the seller has made commitments to provide further details and videos to enhance buyer confidence and transparency.
Negative: Certain negative aspects have emerged, particularly around the vehicle's history and condition, with @WisdomFirst asking for clarification on the transmission rebuild, which sparked discussions about prior maintenance issues. Users have expressed skepticism about the rear being too high and requested further confirmation regarding fluid leaks and undercarriage conditions. Finally, there are reservations about the vehicle's overall history with multiple previous owners and potential expensive repairs like camshaft failures, indicating cautious consideration needed for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @viceman9898 (The Seller) emphasizes the exceptional qualities of the 3000GT, highlighting its remarkable handling and condition, which surpasses many modern cars. The car has been well-loved by its previous owner for over 20 years, suggesting that it has been maintained meticulously. Additionally, @viceman9898 shares a sentimental connection to the vehicle, reminiscing about the joy and appreciation for its design, making it clear that this GT is not just a car, but a cherished piece of history. The seller expresses confidence that the car will be a joy to its next owner for many years to come.
Neutral: @That3000gtguy provides a practical perspective on the 3000GT, particularly comparing the VR-4 to the SL models. The SL is noted as a cost-effective choice, appealing to budget-conscious buyers without sacrificing much in terms of driving experience. This perspective positions the SL as a reliable daily driver or long-distance cruiser, which adds to the overall desirability of the 3000GT line for various types of buyers. @viceman9898 also answers questions from potential buyers, indicating a transparent and engaged sales process.
Negative: There are concerns raised by @Kflow regarding the visibility of dashboard indicators in the video, which may indicate a lack of clarity for potential buyers. @Mike1492 inquires about the spare ignition parts, which suggests uncertainty about the vehicle's current condition and the necessity of replacements. Although @viceman9898 reassures prospective bidders that the parts are not needed right away, the existence of these questions implies there may be apprehension regarding the car's maintenance needs, which could deter some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Mindmaniac calls the vehicle iconic and expresses that the new owner will be lucky to have it. @Ramenator praises the car's appearance, noting it closely resembles the vehicle from the first two seasons of the show. @MyDirtIsRed shares a nostalgic sentiment, claiming their affinity for GM vehicles stems from experiencing this specific car in the past, highlighting its lasting appeal.
Neutral: @Krconstruction04 (The Seller) shares a personal note, stating they are sad to sell the car after creating cherished memories with their kids. They mention that the car has drawn significant attention at shows and ice cream outings. Multiple users question various features such as the functionality of the A.I. and audio systems, with @Bbrog2222 expressing concerns about video playback but later confirming successful playback on a different device.
Negative: @WolfandMare points out discrepancies regarding the vehicle's VIN, suggesting confusion about the production year. @slervy questions whether the audio is emitted from outside or inside the vehicle and expresses concern about the sounds not matching the original series. @SKJSS raises a query regarding the car's heating and air conditioning functionalities, indicating some uncertainty about its condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Rowdyroyce describes the vehicle as "nice" and well done, wishing luck to others. @Neilche calls it an "awesome rig" while @dixoncj vouches for The Seller, highlighting the machine's quality and their friendship. @Edwards71 praises the build as perfect for adventures, and @Bchboy33 appreciates the functionality of the gas tanks system. @Jwb1970 mentions the beautiful build, commenting on the V6 engine adding just the right amount of power. @B-Mac77 (The Seller) reassures potential buyers about the Jeep's street legality, and others like @06Roushsport and @edellavedova admire the smooth drive and the build's unique character respectively.
Neutral: @mikeisit86 inquires about battery access and if there's locking/unlocking functionality in the passenger seat, expressing concern over their budget. Comments from @rustyray bring up the idea that while this isn't a classic 1942 Willys, the restomod features are appealing. Questions from @ClydeWmoss and @Jcintortola about a driving video and the vehicle's street legality show genuine interest without strong opinions either way. @B-Mac77 (The Seller) provides detailed responses to these queries, ensuring potential buyers have the information they need before bidding.
Negative: @buckinjeep raises safety concerns regarding the vehicle's drum brakes, while @Valkyrja feels the build may have lost its original soul despite acknowledging its quality. @rustyray adds to the discussion by noting that older Willys models aren't designed for highway speeds, cautioning against extended use on highways. This caution suggests some apprehension regarding the vehicle's practicality for everyday use, contrasting with other comments that celebrate the build's capabilities.
|
 |
Positive: @johnnyb11 enthusiastically praises the tractor, highlighting its features such as a PTO, belt pulley, 3pt hitch, wheel weights, and a bucket, suggesting it has everything one could want. @JTOM4 also expresses admiration for the tractor, mentioning ownership of a similar model and commending its low-end torque and functional design, calling John Deere 2 cylinders 'works of functional art.' @Kdrahn shares a nostalgic connection to the tractors from his youth and appreciates the iconic sound they produce, calling the well-restored model M gorgeous.
Neutral: Several comments include inquiries about the tractor's specifications and manuals. @73carnut asks about the availability of the operator's manual, which @1972vintage confirms is easily available but does not have in stock, noting the price range for a nice manual. @toddjonas raises concerns about the functionality and leaks of the tractor, receiving detailed responses from @1972vintage about the status of oil and hydraulic leaks, the performance of the loader, and the absence of overheating during usage.
Negative: @toddjonas expresses concerns regarding potential oil leaks and the hydraulic system's performance, questioning whether the bucket maintains its position when lifted. While @1972vintage addresses these issues and assures there are no significant oil leaks, the mention of a hydraulic leak from the touch-o-matic lever may raise some red flags for potential buyers. Additionally, the limitation in lifting capacity mentioned by @1972vintage might be seen as a drawback for those needing heavier lifting capabilities.
|
 |
Positive: @Revrider expressed admiration for the vehicle's color, particularly highlighting the Xenon blue finish. Furthermore, @mrmspartan provided a detailed narrative about the car's history, emphasizing its unique backstory and connection to friends, which adds a personal touch to the vehicle's profile. The Cadillac XLR's rarity was also noted, as @mrmspartan shared specific production numbers, showcasing its limited nature, particularly the unique Xenon Blue variant.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle provided insights into its historical significance, noting that it was originally purchased with only 170 miles and has remained well cared for, with @mrmspartan mentioning meticulous maintenance practices such as seasonal storage and limited summer use. The Cadillac XLR Registry entry also added credibility to the car's authenticity and lineage, serving as an informative point for potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle, particularly from @AthensCarGuy, who inquired about common maintenance issues, specifically regarding the durability of the dash cover, suggesting that there might be problems that potential buyers should be aware of. Additionally, @WascoWeed commented on the pricing context, indicating that the car might seem significantly more expensive when adjusted for inflation, hinting at potential buyer hesitance due to perceived value versus cost.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, with @todd5laz calling it one of the best trucks he has ever owned and @mikeb23ft praising the incredible seats. @ttocs6991 (The Seller) shares excitement about the 1999 Chevy Silverado K1500, highlighting its low mileage and excellent condition. Commenters like @LWNMWR and @nbibeau compliment the immaculate interior, with @nbibeau describing it as a beautiful truck, further affirming the vehicle's appeal as a desirable option.
Neutral: Several commenters engage with factual inquiries about the vehicle's features and condition. @azlazbat asks about the age of the tires, to which @ttocs6991 (The Seller) responds with specific date codes. Other questions include the presence of aftermarket switches as noted by @bigben-74, and the integrity of the original paint confirmed by @ttocs6991 (The Seller). Additionally, @classicSilverado seeks clarity on potential coolant leaks associated with the engine, with @ttocs6991 reassuring that the gaskets have been replaced and there are no current leaks.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by commenters about the vehicle's previous damage and modifications. @dougklink queries the extent of a minor collision damage, and @samtrucksetc questions if the tailgate was replaced, hinting at possible inconsistencies with the vehicle's original parts. @rafaelme points out discrepancies with the tailgate sticker, suggesting it may not align with expected features of the Silverado model. Overall, while the vehicle garners significant interest, there are hints of uncertainty regarding its complete original condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's stunning condition and restoration quality. @CSAZAR describes it as absolutely gorgeous, while @Kibeco, a seasoned collector, mentions feeling a current through their spine upon seeing it, indicating the emotional response it evokes. @RedRon remembers his first bike and praises its cleanliness, while @Mr.Wonderful feels it should be displayed in a museum. Others like @daves79x and @skyancher highlight that the Honda CB750 is an iconic and significant motorcycle, reflecting on its enduring excellence and reliability.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions about specific details and features of the bike. @mwv1500 inquires about straps on the frame, while @Calcarl questions a purple tool kit bag. @Samuelo (The Seller) clarifies the source of some parts and addresses general inquiries, including confirming the functionality of electrical components as mentioned by @zaneotic. There are also discussions about the historical context of the bike's production variations, exemplified by @jehagado and @daves79x, who note changes in tank design.
Negative: Some critiques have been made regarding minor aesthetic choices on the bike. @Calcarl initially points out what he perceives as flaws, such as a red wire and the color of the tool kit bag, though he later apologizes for some misconceptions. @bmasho suggests that the current bidding price is surprising given market trends, hinting at possible concerns over valuation. Overall, while there are minor criticisms, they seem outweighed by the general approval and appreciation for the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its unique qualities and overall appeal. @MrJWT describes it as 'sick,' while @Calli74 admits to kind of loving it. @Noisycow finds it to be possibly the coolest 'mini van' they have ever seen, labeling it an eye-catcher, and @h2o_snow humorously refers to it as a 'soccer mom urban assault vehicle.' The @JapanMotors (The Seller) echoes this vibe, calling the lifted Delica super cool and acknowledging the remarkable job done by the previous owner in Japan. He notes the vehicle’s excellent ride quality and performance during driving, praising its ability to navigate challenging terrains smoothly, which reassures potential buyers of its capabilities.
Neutral: Several commenters focus on practical aspects of the vehicle rather than aesthetic or experiential evaluations. @SimplexFish inquires about the gear ratios that were changed due to the 38-inch tires, evidencing a concern for performance specs. @Stack_9000 requests information about the overall height of the vehicle, to which @JapanMotors responds that it stands at 107 inches. Queries from @Bagelz regarding the timing belt and the condition of the drive belt indicate a cautious interest in the vehicle’s maintenance history. The seller also addresses these concerns by confirming that both A/C and heater are functioning well, and he offers to provide shipping details to potential buyers, showcasing a willingness to engage with inquiries.
Negative: On a more critical note, a few commenters lay out their concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and historical maintenance. @Vremacs-BAT raises a question about the absence of air conditioning, indicating some expectations for comfort features, which @JapanMotors clarifies positively. @Bagelz expresses worry about the potential dryness of the drive belt and asks whether the timing belt has been serviced, which could reflect concerns regarding the engine's reliability. Overall, while the majority of comments lean positive, there are legitimate questions about upkeep and specifics that potential buyers might find valuable.
|
2001 Ford F-550 Super Duty Lariat Crew Cab Power Stroke Dually 4×4
1FDAW57F81EB68110
Lot 219553
Dealer
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciated the vehicle's features, particularly the air tank for the air horn as clarified by @tifjeslil (The Seller). The seller's transparency regarding the original mileage of 93,000 miles, despite initial confusion over the remanufactured transmission receipt, was also noted positively. Additionally, the seller's confirmation of no leaks and the presence of a catalytic converter reassured potential buyers about the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions regarding specifics of the vehicle, such as @hatchetman inquiring about the tank capacity, and @Cpilcher asking about the fuel fill location. Others pointed out discrepancies in the listing, like @Automator59 noting the presence of XLT fender emblems on a Lariat model and concerns like @Cmpp747's inquiry about possible panel separation. The discussions indicated that while the vehicle had appealing aspects, there were also notable inconsistencies in the listing that needed clarification from the seller.
Negative: There were concerns raised about discrepancies in mileage mentioned in the listing versus the receipts @jeffeager noted and the overall accuracy of the listing with @Trucklover1972 expressing doubts. Comments by @AUDD1ST brought up skepticism about the price of the remanufactured transmission, suggesting that a price of $800 seemed too low compared to past experiences. Furthermore, there were inquiries about potential issues such as leaks @AUDD1ST's detailed questions and @Cmpp747's concerns about panel separation, indicating a need for thorough inspection before potential buyers feel comfortable proceeding.
|
 |
Positive: @fsgreasley commented on the vehicle's appearance, describing it as very nice. @carbonhay expressed enthusiasm about the car's manual transmission, saying it has been a fantastic experience for him and indicating a potential interest in purchasing another similar vehicle. The seller, @King95, shared how he spent months searching for the specific model and highlighted his enjoyment of the vehicle over his ownership, emphasizing that it handles incredibly well and is a real head-turner.
Neutral: @e36m52 inquired about the remaining lien on the vehicle as well as the reason for the shock replacement. @JSRay noted that the front ride height looked higher in pictures, suggesting it could be an optical illusion. There were several inquiries regarding the car's features, such as the availability of a driving video and the inclusion of PDLS+, showing interest but without specific criticisms or praises.
Negative: @2002dave raised concerns about the need for replacement of door and trunk panels, classifying it as an odd repair. The seller, @King95, acknowledged common issues with the vehicle model but assured that all repairs were handled under the CPO warranty. @Friarmike84 stated that the amount of lien shouldn't concern potential buyers, indicating some frustration about inquiries related to it, but not negatively reflecting on the car itself.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters acknowledge the care and love that @Lovecars4me has for the vehicle, with @Driven4more noting that the auction still has time left for bids to increase. @Lovecars4me shares that the car is enjoyable to drive, has turned heads wherever it goes, and has received positive feedback from members of the Z owners club. Furthermore, the seller provides extensive maintenance records and a video of the engine start-up, emphasizing the vehicle's upkeep and reliability, which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: The comments reflect a mix of inquiries about the vehicle's condition, with multiple individuals like @dtl2000 asking for clarification on specific issues such as potential water stains or the severity of the rust. @Lovecars4me addresses these inquiries by affirming that the rust is not through and assures that the vehicle does not have any leaks. Some users, including @andre_lopez, inquire about maintenance and reliability, indicating a general interest in the car's condition while remaining non-committal on making bids.
Negative: There are indications of disappointment regarding the initial low bids, with @Lovecars4me commenting on feeling hurt by the lack of interest in the car. @linusx sarcastically remarks that crying won’t get bids, showing a lack of sympathy for the seller's concerns. Comments imply that the vehicle's imperfections, such as dents, rust, and interior wear, are potential deterrents for bidders, with @mcest2025 specifically asking whether the dents and rust are the only cosmetic issues, suggesting that buyers are wary of the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @downesphoto (The Seller) describes the 1949 GMC truck as a sweet vehicle, emphasizing its appealing aesthetics. @Spudster compliments the truck's appearance, noting it as a great-looking 3/4 ton. Additionally, @mikes440 acknowledges the truck's appeal while inquiring about its functionality and features, suggesting that it is an attractive option for vintage vehicle enthusiasts. @downesphoto (The Seller) reassures potential buyers about the truck's driving condition, stating it runs and drives great and is suitable for highway use.
Neutral: The discussion includes a few clarifications on details about the truck. @ccpanel points out that a 150 is not technically classified as a 3/4 ton, which provides useful context for potential buyers. @TMbat raises questions about possible fitment issues with the hood and the condition of the interior door panels, which the seller addresses with specific mentions of scratches and alignment, maintaining transparency for interested parties. The seller, @downesphoto, provides further information about the truck's color, noting its depth difficulty in capturing through photos, which adds to the informative nature of the comments.
Negative: Some concerns are highlighted regarding the truck's condition. @TMbat questions if the hood fitment is off and whether the interior door panels are damaged, indicating potential issues that could affect the overall appeal of the vehicle. @mikes440 raises important questions about driveability and the functionality of various components, such as the e-brake and lighting, pointing to the necessity for thorough inspection before final purchase. @downesphoto acknowledges the presence of a non-blinking right turn signal but assures that they will address this before the sale.
|
 |
Positive: @RockyVolvo89 expresses a strong endorsement for the seller, @kefala23, highlighting their reputable and honest service at JK Volvo in Pasadena. Additionally, @royclausen praises the comfort of the cloth seats in the Volvo 240, indicating a lasting affection for the model, even referencing his experience with over 300K miles. @Dollycat3 also appreciates the quality of the work done on the vehicle, acknowledging it as beautiful and commendable, contributing to a positive sentiment about the car's condition and aesthetics.
Neutral: @masterqi raises a few questions regarding the coolant color and the size of the subwoofer, appearing to be curious about the vehicle's original features and updates. @silverduck inquires about the A/C functionality and the absence of an invoice for the work performed, seeking clarification on the completed repairs. @MissMyE30 shares constructive comments, noting that while the hood may need paint, the trunk, sides, and roof appear to be in good condition, and requests a driving video to better assess the vehicle's performance.
Negative: There are concerns from @silverduck regarding the lack of an invoice for the A/C work, suggesting that potential buyers might worry about the transparency of repairs done on the vehicle. @MissMyE30 notes imperfections in the paint of the hood, implying that the vehicle requires some cosmetic attention, and requests further documentation through a driving video to see how it shifts through the gears, highlighting a need for assurance in the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors like @Trigger46 expressed excitement about the vehicle, referring to it as beautiful and considering visiting to check it out. @JPierson noted that the car looks un-driven since it was built and praised its upgrades, stating that the Dynamator and fan ensure the vehicle's functionality. @jimmyhilton complimented the color combination of the MG TD, indicating that it stands out beautifully, and expressed overall enthusiasm for the vehicle.
Neutral: Many comments from @Sierra_Classic_Sportscar (The Seller), indicate that the auction is open and encourage potential buyers to ask questions and set up inspections. The seller provided details about the car's history and offered insights into the selling process, making it clear that they are a restoration shop rather than a dealership. There were queries from other users, such as @TCRICHARDS asking if side curtains are included, and @tgmcmurray inquiring about the speedometer issue, reflecting a mix of interest and clarifying questions.
Negative: Concerns were raised by users such as @billyblyth, who pointed out a possibly misaligned headlight, and @JWCrosby, who noted an apparent broken exhaust hanger and asked for clarification on an extra board that seemed improperly attached. @morganplus8 remarked that the vehicle might need more mirrors, suggesting a potential functionality flaw. Furthermore, @rednag humorously pointed out the inaccurate statement regarding voltage upgrades, which could indicate a lack of attention to detail.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters express enthusiasm about the Montreal vehicle project, noting its potential as a fun restomod or classic car. @Super7Driver mentions the exciting prospects of a small displacement aluminum V8 while others, like @skyancher, emphasize the vehicle's solid base, indicating it could become a magnificent car at road level. Commenters like @Olibor1 (The Seller) assure interested buyers about the solidity of the car, stating it presents a rare opportunity for a project, especially compared to other rusted Montreals.
Neutral: There are practical considerations shared among commenters about the project, especially regarding sourcing missing parts. @devjo03 suggests obtaining a Virginia title could ease future registrations, while @67satisfaction highlights challenges in finding parts for the Montreal. A mixed tone is present where some see the project as complicated yet potentially rewarding if they had the right resources, as mentioned by @kmharrop and @ar10564, indicating that commitment and patience would be required for restoration.
Negative: Conversely, some commenters raise concerns about the car's condition and the extensive amount of work required to restore it. @pinshaw points out many missing components that need sourcing, which could deter some buyers, while @formularacer details the difficulty of restoring such a car to its original condition. The reality that sourcing parts may be nearly impossible for some, as noted by @watry, creates a sense of caution among potential bidders who recognize the challenges involved in taking on this project.
|
 |
Positive: @Cadillac_man appreciates the correct name for the unique feature of the vehicle, the Astroroof, giving kudos for its accurate representation. @Tx71ak, the seller, highlights that this Biarritz is one of only 25 with an Astroroof. In addition to its rarity, he shares interesting details about its paint and the installation process, underscoring the classic nature of the car. The seller also emphasizes the car's comfortable ride, noting that it cruises effortlessly at 65-70 mph and receives a lot of positive attention, with many people giving thumbs up while driving.
Neutral: Comments from @Tedkk and @guessnot show a desire for more information about the vehicle, including images of specific areas that might have issues, such as corrosion on the back window and undercarriage. @Middler89 expresses mixed feelings about the color combination, but acknowledges the comfort of the car. @genral1 raises a question about the reasons for selling the vehicle so soon and asks for any undisclosed issues, which indicates a cautious interest in the car's condition.
Negative: @carfan1978 points out the downsides of the vehicle, mentioning 'skin cancer' around the base of the vinyl top and the difficulty in fixing it. @CORVAIRWILD shares a negative personal experience regarding the similar color of the car and points out rust issues. These comments imply that while the car has charm, it also faces significant challenges regarding maintenance and aesthetics.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed an appreciation for the retro style and overall appeal of the vehicle, indicating that it could be a great addition for those looking for a fun, classic ride. @wapsirat mentioned that the car is an 'eyeball magnet' and emphasized that the ability to register the vehicle is what truly matters. @TMPost noted that the vehicle starts, runs, and stops as desired, which is a significant aspect for potential buyers planning long road trips. @Dustyman relayed their fondness for the 223 motor, highlighting the nostalgia associated with owning such a classic vehicle. Overall, many feel that it represents a unique opportunity for car enthusiasts.
Neutral: The conversation around the vehicle included some valid inquiries regarding its authenticity, specifically surrounding the concerns raised by @AvionicsTech and @Evan-Manning regarding the Shelby American VIN plate. While there was curiosity and skepticism, others like @wapsirat and @Wheelman9 (The Seller) acknowledged that the vehicle is more of a 'rat rod' rather than a concours-level classic, suggesting that the focus should be on the enjoyment it brings rather than strict adherence to originality. The seller has engaged with potential buyers to clarify some misunderstandings, particularly about the vehicle’s title and its history, which sparked further discussion including the practicality of ownership and modifications.
Negative: Several commenters raised critical points about the vehicle's discrepancies, such as the mismatched engine type compared to the VIN, leading to concerns about its provenance. @AvionicsTech highlighted the misleading claims associated with the Shelby VIN plate, arguing that it could mislead buyers into thinking they are purchasing a car with racing heritage. Furthermore, @Evan-Manning expressed doubt about the authenticity of the VIN plate, suggesting that it could have been swapped rather than the engine itself. Also, @mbasore1952 raised technical concerns about the car's modifications, specifically about the dual exhaust implication that seemed to contradict the characteristics of the straight six engine, which added to the skepticism surrounding the vehicle's modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @dgm33 believes this vehicle presents an ideal opportunity for a project reminiscent of skateboard legend Bucky Lasek, indicating a sense of excitement surrounding its potential. @TessieB finds the vehicle nicely presented, enhancing its appeal. @japans2k appreciates the cool design and the clever placement of the spare tire, expressing a desire to own such a vehicle for weekend adventures. @BigTasty3 feels this car is undervalued at $50,000, reflecting nostalgia for Gen X buyers. @jeffward25 describes the vehicle as perfect for daily use, while also seeking information about its bed length, showing interest in its practicality. Additionally, @CarbonHAY shares a personal connection by reminiscing about owning a similar model in college, highlighting the vehicle's charm and potential for fun.
Neutral: The comments from @omidathari (The Seller) provide crucial details about the vehicle's condition and features, including a clarification regarding the odometer reading that exceeds mechanical limits. As the seller explains, the mileage is actual at 244K, and the title mistakenly checked a box indicating a rollover occurred. @tcadwell inquires about the existence of air conditioning, which @omidathari confirms is equipped but needs servicing. @12trey4 asks about issues with the 4WD system, pointing to a need for clarity on its operational status. The dialogue addresses concerns about the vehicle while also providing useful specifications.
Negative: Concerns emerge from @tcadwell's inquiry regarding a mechanical issue indicated on the title, which suggests a potential red flag about the vehicle's history. @Drjay242 notes that while the vehicle looks like it has air conditioning, it doesn't currently work, hinting at possible repairs needed. There is an underlying uncertainty about the 4WD system from @12trey4, indicating that there might be operational issues that need to be resolved. The combination of these comments from potential buyers reflects a cautious approach when considering the acquisition of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @knsd, provides a welcoming tone in the auction, expressing readiness to meet potential buyers' needs by offering to remove the tires if they are not desired. They highlight the tires' condition, mentioning that they were stored in climate-controlled conditions and have not been exposed to the elements since removal. Furthermore, @knsd confidently states that the tires are functional enough for moving a car around, indicating the level of care that has been taken with the wheels and tires.
Neutral: Commenters engage in a discussion regarding the age and condition of the tires, with @Carcrazy1979 seeking clarification about the date codes and the year of manufacture. @type14 points out that if the tires are from 2005, they suggest removing them before shipping the wheels, which reflects a practical concern about the value and safety of using older tires. The seller clarifies that all tires are indeed from 2005 and shows willingness to assist with the buyer's preferences regarding the tires.
Negative: Some concerns arise about the tires' age and reliability from commenters like @Carcrazy1979 and @type14, who express hesitance about using older tires on a long journey. There is an implied skepticism regarding the safety and worth of shipping tires from 2005, suggesting that they may not provide value based on their condition. The mention of considering them 'old' and potentially unsuitable for high-speed travel raises doubts about how they would perform for everyday use.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the truck's aesthetic appeal and quality craftsmanship. @BChas3 shared a positive experience of seeing the vehicle in person, noting its incredible attention to detail and unique vibe. @TKENIG described the truck as beautiful and expressed a desire to purchase it if they didn't already own two others, which indicates a strong liking for the vehicle.
Neutral: Some commenters sought more information about the vehicle's specifications and history. @CJ7Joe inquired whether the vehicle had been in an accident, while others, such as @ihmcguinness, asked about the cruising speed on the highway. @MaupinMotorWorks provided an opinion on the color description, suggesting that it didn't match the stated 'Olive' color, which highlights varied perceptions about the vehicle's details.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's paint job, with @CJ7Joe questioning the different shades noted on the passenger side. This skepticism was addressed by @casciomotors (The Seller), who clarified that there were no accidents and attributed the color variations to lighting. Additionally, @ihmcguinness expressed difficulty in assessing cruising speed while watching a video, suggesting that more clarity could enhance buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors expressed an appreciation for the 1931 Model A pickup's rarity and desirability, particularly noting the wide bed option which is a late-year upgrade. @Davey_Jones highlighted that the green paint serves as a standout feature, making it easy to spot among similar models. @1964ss also praised the truck's appearance and mentioned his own similar model, indicating a positive community perception of the vehicle's aesthetics and uniqueness.
Neutral: Several comments included beneficial details regarding the specifications of the wide bed and the condition of its fenders. @Crewchief333, the seller, provided clarification about the dimensions and rarity of the wide bed and its fenders, responding to inquiries about these components. The discussion about the truck's paint color and the market performance of late 31 models also indicated interest in the broader trends of Model A pickups.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition with specific references to potential repairs. @CarolinaCrawdad inquired about the condition of the fenders, and @Crewchief333 acknowledged a history of a fuel bowl leak, adding transparency about the truck's maintenance. The uncertainties regarding the radiator repairs also pointed to worries that the vehicle might not be in pristine condition, which could affect its desirability for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @lilcuda shares a nostalgic sentiment about Honda minibikes from childhood, expressing a longing for the model due to a restrictive upbringing. @Bigd_1979 reminisces about the joy of riding a red and green model with his brother, highlighting the fun associated with these minibikes. @rzuchowicz admires the bike's restoration, recognizing the impressive nature of the model compared to other neighborhood minibikes and recalling fond memories linked to it. @skyancher comments on how this bike was essential for camping trips, recalling how it provided endless fun on the trails during childhood.
Neutral: @advco, the seller, provides detailed information regarding the bike's second gear issue commonly faced by earlier models like the QA50, clarifying that modifications were made during an engine rebuild to mitigate this problem. The seller also offers assistance with delivery options within a specified distance, suggesting a willingness to engage with potential buyers about the vehicle.
Negative: @Dblcluchit raises a concern regarding the transmission's condition, specifically inquiring about a known issue with the second gear which could be seen as a significant factor for potential buyers. Additionally, @mrhemi426 points out a missing OEM exhaust pipe clamp, replaced with a hose clamp, which could imply concerns about authenticity and the bike's overall restoration quality.
|
 |
Positive: @collectiveauto (The Seller) enthusiastically presents a striking one-owner vehicle with low mileage and in nearly original condition, praising its rarity and the absence of modifications. @Fleuger99 calls the vehicle great and fun to drive, reflecting positive experiences with a similar model. @JetCity993RS expresses admiration for the car's design, highlighting its outstanding features and the challenges of limited garage space for potential buyers.
Neutral: Various commenters, including @M3rryChristmas and @scoobysouth, seek clarification on the vehicle's 1st gear issue, indicating that it could be related to common transmission characteristics, such as the balk ring. @M3rryChristmas, along with others, expresses curiosity about the seller's preference for private messages to discuss concerns directly. @bigTasty3 appreciates the seller's responsiveness and thoroughness in addressing questions regarding maintenance and previous service history.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the vehicle's transmission performance, with @WIZZZZ noting that despite a new transmission and clutch, there are ongoing issues with shifting into 1st gear. @67S3 questions the need for a new clutch shortly after installation, hinting at reliability concerns. Commenters like @MatthewAK and @rcat1234 share similar experiences with their own Subaru models, suggesting that issues with the balk ring and difficulty in shifting may be widespread and potentially frustrating for owners.
|
40-Years-Owned, Supercharged 540 Merlin-Powered 1956 Ford F-100
F10V6E44121
Lot 219521
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the impressive craftsmanship and uniqueness of the vehicle, with @0064merc expressing admiration for the build quality, calling it a "Top Shelf Build". @TVSPOTZ points out that there's nothing about the vehicle that feels lacking, commending the builder and owner for their work. @wfrancis2 describes the truck as being nearly "Perfect" after seeing it in person, while @boaboyoz also praises it as a phenomenal Florida Ford F-100, reflecting a general sense of awe and appreciation for the design and execution. @Fatalvenom, despite not typically being a fan of trucks, acknowledges it as "blatantly vulgar and awesome," capturing the sentiment of many viewers who admire its bold presence.
Neutral: Several comments provide technical insights or ask questions about specific features of the vehicle. @Torreggiani inquires about whether the truck has air conditioning, which the seller, @Twheeley, clarifies it does not, but mentions there is a blower fan for the windshield. @cb65 raises questions about the modifications made to the truck's bed and fenders, which @Twheeley answers with details about the construction process. Additionally, @Indebt1669 humorously suggests that the bidding price of the truck might only equal half the value of its engine, reflecting the vehicle's high performance expectations without taking a strong stance.
Negative: Some comments point out minor flaws in the vehicle's presentation. @dhonthehill mentions that the rear license plate appears crooked, suggesting an oversight in detail despite the truck's many positive attributes. @bratfink expresses disappointment in expected engine details, interpreting the build name "Merlin" as a reference to something more impressive than what was exhibited. @Eric_B critiques the unconventional speaker placements in the truck, remarking that they seem random but acknowledges the overall amazing quality of the build, indicating some inconsistencies in expectations versus reality.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered numerous positive comments highlighting its reliability and desirability. @Collectibleclassics emphasizes that the 2013-2015 G550 models feature the last metal bumpers and the famous naturally aspirated V8 engine, making them highly sought after. Many users appreciate the unique Diamond Silver Metallic color and the luxurious Designo interior, stating that it is a rare combination that stands out. @HELIDR and @VantageAuto echo this sentiment, noting that the G Wagon is an extraordinary machine, with one of the best motors ever produced. The seller also mentions that this particular G550 has been well-maintained, is turn-key ready, and includes many modern features like blind-spot monitoring and heated seats, which enhance its appeal as an off-road luxury vehicle.
Neutral: Comments also reflect a neutral stance on certain features of the G550, particularly concerning the aftermarket FOX shocks and the condition of the wheels and lug nuts. @jglobe asks about potential signs of rust, to which the seller responds that while the lug nuts show some rust, the rest of the vehicle is well-preserved with no rust issues. The question surrounding the vehicle's previous use for off-roading elicited several informative responses from the seller, confirming that the vehicle has always been maintained in excellent condition. Additionally, there is discussion about the vehicle's previous ownership and servicing history, which suggests a positive outlook for potential buyers who value transparency and thorough documentation.
Negative: On the flip side, there are some critical remarks regarding potential issues with the vehicle's condition. @MBCATech raises concerns about visible rust on components, pointing out that such corrosion is unusual for the mileage. @b.flippo notes that the wheel and lug issues appear more consistent with damage from wheel acid rather than salt exposure, which could indicate past maintenance discrepancies. Further, @120VDOC remarks about potential dents on the roof and expresses the need for clarification and photographic evidence. The seller responds firmly, denying the existence of such damage and referencing the vehicle's clean history, but the raised doubts may affect the perceptions of some potential buyers, causing a slight blemish on the overall positive impression of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the Mini R53's aesthetics and engineering. @mlowengrub finds the car to be sharp-looking, while @Joey1320 highlights the car's sturdy engine and absence of common issues like "mushroomed" strut towers, which is a positive sign for potential buyers. @shelbyglhs also commends the car, relating its enjoyable driving experience to past ownership experiences and suggesting its value to collectors. Overall, there is a consensus that the Mini represents a fun and well-crafted vehicle that appeals to enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments provide clarifications about the vehicle's features and specifications. @iakllc (The Seller) confirms that the Mini does not have heated front seats, which leads @mlowengrub to inquire about retrofitting options. @13VT explains the variations of seating and notes the potential costs of retrofitting heated seats, adding complexity to the vehicle's ownership experience. Commenters also discuss the presence of the home link mirror option, which includes useful features but doesn't directly contribute to the car's primary appeal.
Negative: While many praises are directed towards the R53, there are negatives noted, particularly around the lack of heated seats, especially for those in colder climates, as pointed out by @shelbyglhs. @RSW’s inquiry underscores a concern about the vehicle's leather seats being unprepared for heating, which could be seen as a drawback. Additionally, @Fhawk raises a concern about potential rust issues, although @iakllc reassures that the vehicle spent its life in California and has no rust, indicating some potential anxieties from interested buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @UOENO highlighted the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, calling it the best looking M3/M4 coupe ever, particularly praising its original tanzanite blue and BMW wheels. @NeemaG (The Seller) expressed excitement about the car, describing it as an absolute dream. Other commenters like @bbrs and @brahl also shared positive sentiments, with @bbrs appreciating the car's look and @brahl expressively admiring Frankie’s care for the vehicle during ownership.
Neutral: @Dj0726 compared the F82 competition manual to the 993 equivalent of the M3/M4's lifecycle, suggesting its significance across brands. @iandllnghm noted the presence of older auction photos in the current listing and expressed curiosity about some factory stickers still being visible after years. @sbanke raised practical questions about service records and the crank hub, demonstrating a balanced approach when evaluating the car.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about potential issues with the car, such as @Famcape58 mentioning a possible door ding that might require significant repair, and @Owah93 inquiring about potential damage to the front bumper. Additionally, @iandllnghm questioned discrepancies in the Carfax report regarding ownership history, while @401kkiller requested clarification on the age of the listed photos in the auction. Overall, while many praised the car's aesthetic and maintenance, concerns about its condition and history were noted.
|
 |
Positive: @robertwichert described the vehicle as 'totally cool old school,' showing appreciation for its vintage style. @mark_99 called it a 'superb Plymouth,' and discussed the striking cherry red color and eye-catching features like the grill and fenders, suggesting that it likely stands out at car shows. @Rolltidericky praised the car's beauty, adding a humorous comment about the engine preference for Mopar motors only, indicating a strong positive sentiment towards the car's heritage.
Neutral: @BirdWatcher25 (The Seller) responded to inquiries, confirming the vehicle's capabilities and features like the power-assisted drum brakes mentioned by @fak10. The seller provided details about the fuel cell capacity, engine condition, and the need for air conditioning to be charged, addressing @cad58Y's concerns. The seller also confirmed the title's validity and assured that the previous owner was active in car shows, signaling transparency and willingness to elaborate on car specifics.
Negative: However, there were some reservations from potential buyers. @stormjerry flagged an issue with VIN verification that would affect registration, while @cad58Y raised questions about specific details including the rear end ratio and RPM at higher speeds, indicating uncertainty about the car's performance. Additionally, @Wildbunch's comment about the confusing knobs above the radio reflected some concerns about the car's functionalities, hinting at potential buyer worries regarding the vehicle's features.
|
 |
Positive: @robertwichert expressed excitement about split window auctions, indicating a strong appreciation for this classic car style. @Dphotos highlighted the vehicle's color combination as the best for a 1963 Split Corvette, stating that it enhances the design's visual appeal. @Vtec4ever shared a sentiment of nostalgia, admiring that the car is preserved in its original state without modifications, which aligns with the manufacturer's original vision.
Neutral: @lromanosky clarified his role as a seller's representative and addressed questions about the vehicle's sale process and importation logistics, emphasizing that it is a private sale. @Malcolm4, the owner since 1971, responded to queries about the engine's history, indicating that it is believed to have its original block that has not been changed during his ownership and detailing the timeline of parts replacement and refurbishment. The dialogue among participants included technical inquiries about the engine and its specifications, providing insight into the car's condition and history without generating any strong opinions either way.
Negative: Concerns arose regarding the car's engine block authenticity, with @DougR and @CorvairGA questioning the accuracy of information regarding its specifications and suggesting that it might have undergone changes that compromise its originality. @Shootnride criticized a comment made by @lromanosky, suggesting inaccuracies in shared information about the engine. General dissatisfaction seems to stem from the ambiguity surrounding the engine's history, especially its replacement status as indicated by comments about the lack of identifiable markings on the block.
|
 |
Positive: @Hondair (The Seller) describes the Land Rover Defender TD5 as 'absolutely beautiful' with features like air conditioning, which is a desirable trait for potential buyers. The seller notes that the vehicle rides and drives very nicely, mentioning enhancements like a bigger steering wheel that improves comfort. Feedback from @coloradogeese indicates satisfaction with the vehicle's performance, highlighting its smooth shifting and acceleration as positive attributes. Additionally, @Hondair mentions that they have not observed any oil leaks, reinforcing the vehicle's reliability.
Neutral: Commenters have raised several questions regarding the vehicle's importability, with @RochB asking about the possibility of obtaining a Safety Certificate for use in Ontario, Canada. @Hondair responds to these inquiries by admitting uncertainty about the certification process but indicates that the vehicle's age may exempt it from some regulations. @LeosKeys queries the cost of converting the Defender from right-hand drive to left-hand drive, but @Hondair confesses they have no experience with such conversions and prefer the original configuration.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's history, with @WAGONBOYTD referencing potential chassis issues common in vehicles from the UK, as noted in the MOT report. This point could be a red flag for buyers worried about structural integrity. Additionally, there are hints at minor problems, like the clutch squeaking, as mentioned by @Hondair, who suggests it may require some minor maintenance yet this could deter buyers looking for a perfectly maintained vehicle.
|
2022 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 2500 Midwest Automotive Designs Ultimate Cruiser 144
W1X4EBHY4NT122178
Lot 219576
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Rott0416 (The Seller) confirmed that the rear couches fold down to make a bed, offering flexibility for sleeping arrangements. Additionally, @Rott0416 also shared that the second-row seats can swivel around, increasing comfort and accessibility within the vehicle. Furthermore, the front seats are heated, which adds to the overall driving experience, especially in colder weather. There are no significant repair issues noted, with @Rott0416 stating that the vehicle does not require any repairs currently, making it a ready-to-use option for buyers.
Neutral: There were several inquiries regarding the vehicle's features and specifications. @JohnOKeefe asked about the rear couches and front bumper repainting, while @NIKISUPREME inquired if there was a shower available in the vehicle, which @Rott0416 clarified there isn't. @Fordmjs and @Mark936 made requests for measurements of various parts of the vehicle, including the sofa bed and the rear door opening width. Overall, the comments reflect a mixture of feature requests and clarification without strong opinions being expressed.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about the lien on the vehicle. @Postman2025 and @criszk sought clarification on the lien details, which @Rott0416 addressed, saying it would be managed by 'bring a trailer' after the sale. Additionally, questions about the vehicle's paint chipping, posed by @classic-michael, indicated worry over its aesthetic condition, with the seller attributing the defect to pre-ownership. There were also queries about the air conditioning performance, with @Mark936 expressing doubt based on experiences with another vehicle, highlighting a potential issue for future buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Fuzznut79 describes the vehicle as embodying the spirit of 'why not?' and expresses admiration for the unconventional build. @Akuznetsov also shares a positive sentiment, indicating that the truck is exactly to their liking. @cblock406 refers to it as the 'ultimate sleeper,' suggesting that its appearance might be deceiving compared to its performance capabilities, which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: @DanielWebber expresses interest in the idea of putting a Chevy V8 in a Toyota, while noting that they would choose a different body. They share a passion for horsepower and are intrigued by the possibilities of the build. @Indetrucks and @OleMissnIL both comment on the absence of running videos, with Indetrucks suggesting it should be against the rules to list the truck without such content. @Ypss36 inquires about the original engine, signaling an interest in the truck's history and modifications.
Negative: @Racer500GP's comment was flagged as non-constructive, indicating a lack of positive engagement with the discussion. @oklahomie disparages the vehicle by comparing it to a 'beer can with a bottle rocket,' emphasizing a negative view on its design or performance. Additionally, @tinyhousevroom raises a concern about air leaks in the suspension, which suggests ongoing issues with the vehicle that potential buyers may find off-putting.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has drawn several compliments highlighting its unique and striking design. Commenters like @Lengrep mentioned that the car is the "definition of 'sick'", showcasing its appeal among car enthusiasts. @VintageFD appreciates the attention to detail, especially with the artwork and metalwork involved in the car's creation. Additionally, the connection to @Ewan McGregor, shared by @Jagman88, enhances the vehicle's narrative, engaging those interested in its history while @merc_s55 expressed genuine interest in bidding, noting that the car's history is a sellable aspect.
Neutral: Several comments have been inquiries and general discussions about the vehicle's specifications and ownership details. @2caddiesandaMach1 shared trivia about a component of the car, while @ratrodCOE sought clarification on the vehicle's suspension and ground clearance, showing curiosity about its practical implications. @Jagman88, the seller, answered various questions about the car's features, such as mentioning the lack of air suspension and how the current ride height affects clearance, addressing concerns from potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the enthusiasm, there are also concerns regarding safety features and functionality. @Skullcar brought up a potential issue with the door hinge, while @bobhailend pointed out hazardous elements like rubber trans cooler lines and the absence of drive shaft hoops. Additionally, @r32fan raised a question about the lack of seat belts, which @Jagman88 acknowledged, indicating it was a decision he left for the future owner. These comments suggest that while the car is visually appealing, certain safety considerations may deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Brett_S, the seller, enthusiastically presents this Grand Wagoneer as a well-cared-for vehicle, having undergone significant upgrades since its original version. The installation of a Vorted 5.3 engine and a rebuilt 4L60E transmission makes it a thoroughly modernized vintage SUV, ideal for both everyday use and leisure. The retrofitting process was handled with care, ensuring that systems like heat and A/C operate efficiently. With a new Retrosound radio that resembles factory settings but includes Bluetooth capabilities, the vehicle appeals to a wide range of potential buyers looking for reliability and enjoyment.
Neutral: @Matt61 inquires about the vehicle's gas mileage, to which @Brett_S responds, noting the average MPG is approximately 17. He mentions that the Grand Wagoneer is notably smaller and lighter compared to a Chevy Tahoe, making it competitive in fuel efficiency. Additionally, @txdore questions the custom fuel tank design, leading to an explanation about the heavy-duty skid plate and stock fuel capacity providing reasonable clarity on the vehicle's components.
Negative: However, not everything is perfect; @Brett_S acknowledges some issues with the power windows and locking system, indicating that the central locking does not fully function as expected, with only the right rear door operable via the front switches. While the power seats move correctly, concerns regarding the lack of cruise control and the slow operation of the power windows may deter some buyers. The comments reveal that while there are impressive upgrades, certain original system limitations still persist.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express a generally positive sentiment about the Karmann Ghia, appreciating its potential as a driver or a restoration project. @hlwimmer notes that it's refreshing to see an 'average' car, while @VWTony describes it as a nice driver that is mostly complete, hinting that it could be driven as is. @A53 admires the color combination, and @kingkarmann remarks on the car's solid condition and good maintenance, praising the documentation and overall enjoyment of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters ask for additional information and clarification about the car's components and specifications. @Buyingformywife requests more detailed frunk photos and inquires about the engine and drum brakes, while @rbfara raises questions about the dashboard trim for the '66 model. The seller, @enthusiastic_enthusiast, responds to these inquiries by promising to provide more images and confirming details about the engine and braking system. Commenters like @63volks also provide helpful advice about locating heater vents and suggest photos of the front truck area.
Negative: Some negative comments highlight concerns regarding specific details and the car's overall completeness. @JJHawaii expresses dissatisfaction with missing chrome trim, and @foamydog warns about a potentially hazardous plastic fuel filter, sharing a past negative experience. @kingkarmann mentions some incorrect details only noticeable to aficionados, and there are concerns about the functionality of warning lights and ventilation systems. @63volks emphasizes the absence of proper heater vents, which underscores the vehicle's incomplete aspects.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning appearance and appealing modifications. @Quadrifoglio described it as a "beautiful resto with all the right stuff," while @AlpineJay noted its beauty and expressed positive feelings toward the Capri wheels on the car, contrasting his previous preferences. @Stephenh27 shared an enthusiastic perspective on the car's horsepower, estimating it to be in the low 300s, which aligns with @HealeyBrothers' confirmation of 340 horsepower from the 302 crate engine. This expression of excitement and praise continued with @1000songs stating it was "just about perfect" and @leeDiamonds drawing attention to the red interior, calling it the nicest he had ever seen on a Tiger.
Neutral: Several commenters provided insights into the vehicle's features and history without overly negative or positive spins. @HealeyBrothers mentioned the factory metal hardtop with a vinyl covering and reassured potential buyers about including an additional set of Panasport wheels. @Stephenh27, who has owned similar cars, complimented the interior's beauty and acknowledged the upgrades as beneficial to the vehicle's legacy. Meanwhile, @Warren pointed out that the hardtop is appealing while noting limitations regarding the gearing for the 5-speed transmission. Conversations also touched on potential questions about paint quality and any previous repairs, reflecting a balanced curiosity.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle's details and components. @lardog007 and @Stage1-gs asked about repainting history and the operating temperatures for the vehicle, indicating there may be uncertainties for potential buyers. Additionally, @mikewood questioned the accuracy of the wheels being described as "period correct," suggesting they might not align with authentic specifications. @66MK1a noted a discrepancy regarding the VIN number, which could point to its documentation or classification as a transition body, potentially affecting its appraisal. Overall, some negative tones emerged from inquiries about the car's authenticity and performance-related elements.
|
 |
Positive: @CJ7sknydp shares fond memories of their first car, a '71 Mach I, highlighting the exhilarating experience of driving it at high speeds. @ChasinFords believes the Mach looks quite nice and could be a fun driver following recent repairs, indicating a positive outlook on the vehicle's condition. Overall, there is an enthusiasm about the car's potential as a fun driving experience among the commenters.
Neutral: @Ohioken asks detailed questions about the vehicle's current condition, inquiring if issues like uneven tire wear and hard starting have been resolved. @Madobo seeks clarification on the car's air conditioning system, wondering if it was originally equipped with factory AC as indicated in the Marti Report. @nancal (The Seller) responds to these inquiries, confirming that the vehicle has been serviced and is satisfactory for local driving but suggests caution for longer trips due to its age.
Negative: There is some skepticism regarding the vehicle's performance and reliability, with @Ohioken checking on the uneven front tire wear and the vehicle's capability for long-distance travel. @z4s8s5 questions whether the AC unit is factory-installed or aftermarket, reflecting potential concerns over the car's authenticity and the accuracy of the Marti Report. The need for clarification on these issues shows a cautious approach from potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Europaisch highlighted the appealing combination of black and tan colors, noting its timeless nature in a 911. Comments also praised the unique features of this 997 model, such as the multifunction steering wheel and extended leather, which adds to the car's luxury feel. @Miles_S (The Seller) echoed this sentiment, expressing his fondness for the Natural Brown interior and the smooth driving experience of the Carrera S, which he described as very enjoyable and powerful with its 3.8 engine. He also offered potential buyers the option to experience the car firsthand in East Tennessee, indicating a welcoming and enthusiastic approach to selling.
Neutral: There were inquiries regarding the car's maintenance history, with @Addy1 asking about service records and @Europaisch questioning the condition of various components like the rear main seal and air-oil separator. @Europaisch also brought up concerns over potential issues like bore scoring and whether a borescope inspection had ever been conducted. These questions reflect the cautious nature of potential buyers eager to understand the car's history and current condition before making a purchase decision.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car’s cold start, with @Ghattig mentioning a potential oil burn and @Europaisch alluding to the longevity of bore scoring issues common in 997s. @Miles_S (The Seller) responded to these worries by clarifying that the puff of smoke on cold starts was typical for the car's engine and that it runs cleanly without major concerns. Additionally, he noted the absence of paper records for some maintenance items, which may deter some buyers looking for thorough documentation of the vehicle's upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: @Stephaniem3, the seller, expressed gratitude for the interest in the bike and emphasized its sentimental value, noting that it was well-loved by her late husband. She encouraged potential buyers to reach out if they had any questions or needed more information about the bike, highlighting her eagerness for it to find a new home. @7ur80 also commented positively, suggesting that the bike is a total survivor, which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: @Bturner114 and @Basil017 discussed the bike's transmission details, with @Bturner114 questioning if it had a 5-speed transmission, while @Basil017 clarified that it is indeed a 4-speed. The seller, @Stephaniem3, responded to the community by confirming this update in the listing after the discussions. @frisco81 inquired about the last time the bike was running, showing an interest in its history without expressing an opinion on its quality.
Negative: @skyancher made a negative comment about the bike, indicating it was terrible and even asked for others to stop bidding to lower the price. Additionally, @Stephaniem3 mentioned that the bike has not been started or on the road for 18 months, which could raise concerns for potential buyers regarding its current condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Anesicolaci (The Seller) describes the Panoz Esperante as a beautiful, rare vehicle with low mileage and collector-owned care, perfect for fun drives. @baileybob427 highlights the car's improved suspension, appealing aesthetics, and a reliable aluminum engine that revs up to 7,000 RPM. @Lexday47 shares a personal experience of owning one, noting its enjoyable driving experience and the rarity of the car compared to mass-produced sports cars.
Neutral: @Magneto comments on the Panoz Esperante, recognizing it as a Mustang in a different style while expressing a fondness for it. @Anesicolaci (The Seller) invites potential buyers to ask questions or schedule viewings to learn more about this unique car. @homer_gator notes the car's color and location but expresses concerns about the condition, specifically mentioning the need for new tires.
Negative: @thestig reports having checked with the factory for parts like headlight buckets and lenses only to find they are not available, indicating potential challenges in sourcing replacement components. @Magneto raises a question regarding the availability of parts, especially in light of the expensive replacement costs for similar vehicles like the Cadillac XLR. Overall, there seems to be a mix of enthusiasm about the vehicle's driving experience, countered by concerns regarding maintenance and part availability.
|
 |
Positive: @bringatrailer noted that the listing was corrected to accurately reflect that the wheels are 21”, which addresses an earlier confusion pointed out by @maisy. @covcarco, the seller, has added more exterior pictures of the vehicle, which can provide potential buyers with a better view outside of the showroom setting.
Neutral: Comments expressed curiosity about the vehicle's specifications including tire details and whether the tires are original. @maisy asked for information on the mileage of the Pirelli tires and the original sale price of the vehicle when new. Additionally, inquiries from @AK61 indicated the MSRP was $67,500 and @tp33 was interested in original maintenance records and the condition of the tires, while @spacevette and @beau17 asked about specific features such as a heated steering wheel and adaptive cruise control.
Negative: @The_BruceB mentioned that the lighting during the vehicle's presentation was not flattering, indicating that the visuals may not do the car justice. @maisy expressed a need for clarification regarding the wheel size discrepancy and additional details about the tires, indicating a lack of information that might concern potential buyers.
|
35k-Mile 2013 Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD LTZ Crew Cab Duramax 4×4
1GC4K1E86DF127564
Lot 219631
Dealer
 |
Positive: @greatnorth510 describes the vehicle as the ultimate toy pulling rig, highlighting its impressive nature. @mblpanda appreciates the truck's attractive appearance, noting its unique specifications like the 3500 single wheel long box in Victory Red and the rarity of having bucket seats. Additionally, @Gizzy points out the lack of surface rust, which is notable for a truck from Pennsylvania, suggesting that it has been well-maintained and cared for over the years.
Neutral: @Dieseljdc, the seller, provides background information about the truck's ownership, indicating that it was purchased from the original owner who used it minimally. The seller emphasizes the truck's good condition and the rarity of finding long boxes in great shape. Throughout the comments, the seller engages with potential buyers, answering their questions and providing additional details about the truck's features and maintenance history.
Negative: @murtk12 raises a concern about the absence of a fifth wheel hitch, but @Dieseljdc clarifies that the truck includes a goose neck ball instead. @Gizzy asks about any minor leaks or issues and whether the previous owner was a smoker, indicating potential worries about the truck’s overall condition. Although the seller reassures that there are no leaks and that the truck has not been smoked in, such inquiries reflect a level of caution among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Myoldcut describes the car as beautiful, expressing a concern about the photos being in shade rather than sunlight, which affects perceived appearance. @Dollycat3 appreciates the low mileage and beautiful interior, suggesting to fix necessary issues to enjoy the car. @nightraveler69 reminisces about their previous experience with a similar vehicle, praising the ride quality, while @Sparrownaut emphasizes the rarity of finding a well-maintained Doeskin interior, valuing it over the paint condition.
Neutral: @GCCars (The Seller) notes that while the car has low mileage and a good interior, the paint is sunburned due to prior parking conditions, but overall condition allows for potential rejuvenation. @Kakayo inquires specifically about the battery gauge issue, seeking confirmation on the battery and alternator functionality. @GCCars (The Seller) reassures that the alternator is functioning properly after a minor gauge adjustment, and shares additional details about other electrical components like the A/C and radio availability.
Negative: @MooCars points out paint issues on several panels, describing it as sunburnt and washed, despite acknowledging the car's low mileage. @Stoneface brings up concerns regarding substantial rust seen in the engine compartment photo, asking for details on the condition of the right side, while @Apex_speed mentions that minor surface rust on the inner fender is common among these cars due to a tendency for leaks. Additionally, @Occ4u notes the cracked condition of the dash wood panels and inquires about door panel trims and cruise control functionality.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle's documentation, with @SuperKram praising the extensive receipts dating back to 1992. @Manhattan1 found the car visually appealing and deemed it suitable as a daily driver, while @mray4444 (The Seller) highlighted the car's reliable performance and excellent condition, noting that he bought it impulsively due to its good state. Furthermore, @Jaredsalinsky and others showed interest in additional driving videos and further information on the car, indicating their engagement and enthusiasm about the auction.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle's condition included inquiries and clarifications from potential buyers. @latneosen shared their experience with a 968 Cab, describing it as a fun car to drive, while @eurocol questioned the reported damages on the Carfax report, expressing confusion over the variety of damage filings. @AirBoss asked for undercarriage photos and details about a potential electrical issue, suggesting that while there were concerns, the conversation remained constructive and focused on obtaining more information.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's accident history and damages documented in the Carfax report. @Jaredsalinsky and @eurocol expressed skepticism about the implications of the accident history, with @one-day making light of a future incident referenced humorously. Additionally, @Spokayman noted that the age of the vehicle and the miles on certain components might warrant caution for potential buyers, suggesting that those interested should consider bringing a trailer for transport.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters enthusiastically praised the vehicle's low mileage, noting it as a remarkable standout in the classic car market. @whipcity76 highlighted the car's attractive design and pristine condition, calling it captivating and a testament to the craftsmanship of Mercedes-Benz. Commenters like @Dollycat3 and @UncleFred1 echoed these sentiments about its beauty, classic color combination, and collectible value, while @Coolbreeze77 shared personal admiration for the car, mentioning his similar model in excellent condition. The general consensus displayed great enthusiasm for the car's history and originality, with commenters indicating its desirability to collectors and enthusiasts.
Neutral: Certain comments provided additional context regarding the vehicle's specifications and condition without strong emotional expressions. @berfinroy clarified some technical details about the engine and performance characteristics, discussing differences between the various models. Other commenters like @MrcBnz55 and @camfen engaged in detailed discussions about the engine's power ratings and transmission options, while @Luz_do_sol outlined the uniqueness of the first-generation R107 SL in comparison to later models. This exchange of information reflected a shared respect among enthusiasts for the technicalities and history behind the model, reinforcing its significance in automotive history.
Negative: Contrasting the otherwise positive feedback, @UncleFred1 raised a concern about the need for a functional video to confirm the vehicle's operational status, suggesting that such documentation can enhance buyer confidence. Similarly, @jpfrazier’s remark about the car's selling price hinted at expectations of high bids, which could suggest pressure on the seller to meet or exceed previous auction results. Additionally, @69_911e pointed out a potential discrepancy regarding the car's model identification, which may indicate some confusion or concern about the details in the auction listing. Overall, while the majority of comments leaned towards admiration, there were necessary reminders about ensuring that the auction listing accurately reflects the vehicle's condition and history.
|
 |
Positive: @robo67 fondly recalls a similar Biscayne model sold by Nickey Chevrolet in Chicago and appreciates the car's sharp appearance. @boaboyoz admires the car's build quality and wishes the seller good luck with the sale. @JayKay2430 expresses nostalgia for the classic Chevy look, particularly the big block and poverty caps, while @Ibuyitall77 appreciates the attractive blue and white color combination and thinks the big block is cool. @PeterLoguidice, the seller, provides insights about the car, stating that it runs smoothly, has been recently worked on in terms of safety and comfort features, and highlights the installation of a Vintage Air system. He assures potential buyers that there are no rust issues and emphasizes the quality of recent paint corrections and re-chroming of the bumper.
Neutral: Several commenters like @WIZZZZ and @wannabid55 have asked technical questions regarding the engine specifics, such as the details of the 396 engine and any potential ticking noises, while @LH3726 and @TMIDetroit express a desire for more details about the car's condition, including underbody pictures and rust checks. @PeterLoguidice addresses these queries by sharing that he has not modified the engine, discussing the recent installation of new battery and alternator, and promising to provide videos and pictures as requested. He emphasizes his commitment to transparency in sharing information about the car and its condition.
Negative: @wannabid55 raises concerns about the valve train noise, asking what could be causing the excessive sound. @WIZZZZ also points out that the car seems slow to start and suggests checking the alternator and battery connections, raising concerns about the car's timing and possible mechanical issues. The mention of potential corrosion and request for underbody photos from @TMIDetroit indicates a wary approach from some potential buyers regarding the car's physical condition. Despite these concerns, @PeterLoguidice reassures everyone that there are no rust issues and emphasizes that the car runs well with no substantial mechanical problems.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz praises the K-1 for its impressive build and coolness, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @tlcamg and @Captainpua express excitement about the vehicle, calling it a 'bad boy,' while @pigman admires it as a super nice hot rod truck, indicating personal preference. @tlcamg also highlights the unique body lines combined with modern components, suggesting a smooth ride, which is echoed by @Bamsport (The Seller) who describes it as a wonderful cruiser with a very nice ride.
Neutral: @pigman expresses interest in the truck and is concerned about the affordability of the vehicle, indicating a potential buyer's mindset. They request that @Bamsport (The Seller) verify the front wheel to fender clearance to see if 2" spacers could be added for aesthetic enhancement. @Bamsport reassures them that there is ample room in the fenders for spacers and mentions their personal preference for the current look, although they acknowledge that spacers could improve the truck's appearance.
Negative: There are no negative comments present in the provided comments about the vehicle. All feedback seems to be positive or at least neutral in tone, with no criticism directed toward the truck's performance, aesthetics, or pricing.
|
 |
Positive: @mrpotty expressed admiration for the effort put into restoring the vehicle, even linking it to personal memories of a late family member. @Bmarcum and @VandyFrog88 echoed similar sentiments, recalling fond memories tied to previous ownership of their own Bronco IIs, emphasizing their reliability and functionality as vehicles. @Klumper noted the vehicle's good condition and mechanical soundness, particularly highlighting the presence of an automatic transmission with overdrive that enhances highway driving comfort. Overall, many comments reflect a nostalgic appreciation for the Bronco II and its enduring capabilities.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in practical inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifics. @ValpoMike requested pictures of the transfer case lever for flat towing purposes, and @Bird76Mojo sought clarification on the vehicle's title status regarding total loss and rebuilt conditions. @gashemi, the seller, provided detailed background information on the vehicle's history, emphasizing the clean title despite past insurance history. Additionally, @Excursion inquired about the presence of fog lights and potential leaks, signaling interest in the vehicle's functional specifics.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about the vehicle's history, particularly regarding the Carfax report indicating previous total loss due to hail damage. @fsacb3 noted the report's mention of an accident and expressed a desire for clarity on that issue. @mountainrev mentioned the potential dangers related to the vehicle's short wheelbase in adverse conditions, sharing a cautionary personal experience. Furthermore, @ftrucktough questioned the lack of clarity in pictures of the instrument panel, signaling some dissatisfaction with the available information.
|
 |
Positive: @ibiggee (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a very nice Buggy, emphasizing its unique features such as the rare 1500 S engine, original HURST shifter, and a significant power upgrade with a 100 amp 12 volt alternator conversion. The seller also mentions that the buggy is in top condition, indicating that it is 100% functioning and ready for use. Additionally, @ibiggee notes that despite his large size, he finds the seats very comfortable and has made adjustments to improve driving comfort further.
Neutral: @ibiggee (The Seller) provides practical information about the vehicle's features, including details on the seats, which are not adjustable. He shares that he installed a clutch kit to enhance driving space, which suggests a focus on customization for a better driving experience. He also highlights the mechanics of the Buggy, mentioning the dual port heads and dual carbs, pointing out aspects that will be of interest to prospective buyers looking for specific performance features in a vehicle like this one.
Negative: While @ibiggee (The Seller) is positive about the vehicle's comfort and features, he notes a potential drawback regarding the adjustability of the seats. This may be a concern for taller buyers who often prefer adjustable seats for better comfort. However, he reassures that even at his height of 6 foot 3 inches and weight of 285 pounds, he has no issues with the comfort, suggesting that the seating may cater better to larger individuals, though the lack of adjustability could impact other consumers.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors generally express affection for the Figaro, highlighting its charm and unique appeal as a city car. @Craven notes the necessity of experiencing one in person to truly appreciate it, while @smb127 shares a compliment on the car's wheels and emphasizes that no other car attracts as much attention. @Tremelune shares a personal milestone, reflecting on the vehicle's compatibility with urban driving, noting it has become their preferred car over even luxury options like an R8. @joey1320 (The Seller) reassures potential buyers about the car's attention-grabbing nature, stating it can be trusted for any journey, further evidenced by a healthy engine as confirmed in compression tests, which all yield strong results.
Neutral: The seller, @Joey1320, provides numerous insights about the car's features and background. He details past work done on the vehicle, including a repaint to its original color and the adjustments made to the interior. He addresses potential bidders' questions about the vehicle's features like air conditioning functionality and emissions tests, assuring them of its compliance and functioning capabilities. About the wheels, @vwvwvw identifies them as resembling Miata wheels, praising their suitability for the Figaro, and @salmoTrutta expresses interest in bidding while inquiring whether it can pass emissions testing in Ohio.
Negative: Some comments showcase skepticism or lack of enthusiasm toward the vehicle. @LLHVAC openly refers to the Figaro as 'ugly,' noting an apparent lack of appeal. Another comments on the effort needed to maintain the vehicle, as mentioned by @ereitz, who suggests there appears to be unfinished work discussed with the seller. @jeffward25 also points out the high mileage of 216k, raising questions about long-term durability despite the car's maintained appearance.
|
 |
Positive: Overall, many comments highlight the vehicle's excellent condition and maintenance. @BobbyGMC009 (The Seller) emphasized that the truck is kept clean, noting it has been garage kept and rarely driven in winter conditions. The seller provided reassurance about the state of the vehicle, mentioning that the tires are in excellent condition and aided by regular maintenance from a dealer since 2017. Commenters such as @Dfhodg praised the truck for its pristine appearance, with one remarking on how impressive it is that the vehicle has been maintained so well despite being a common family transport vehicle.
Neutral: Questions from potential buyers reflect a seeking of specific information regarding the vehicle's features and service history. Commenters like @Lbrumley and @AUBNJ sought confirmation about the Adaptive Fuel Management system and whether the truck has Bluetooth capability, to which @BobbyGMC009 confirmed availability and absence, respectively. The seller also addressed inquiries about the age of the tires and service records, indicating the tires are from the second set and that regular dealer maintenance records begin from 2017, although there were no detailed service records available prior to that.
Negative: There are some concerns highlighted by potential buyers as well. @Imright raised doubts about the documentation of service records, noting that only a few oil changes are verified through Carfax. Other issues included the absence of a backup camera, which @BobbyGMC009 acknowledged, instead mentioning proximity sensors and tilting mirrors to assist when reversing. Overall, while several commenters were pleased with the truck's condition, a lack of thorough service records and certain desired features may deter some prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express enthusiasm and admiration for the VW Variant. @weswheelw68 appreciates the vehicle's uniqueness, while @raynekat praises the awesome color. @SAABNUTT finds it to be a stunner, and @ElGalloTejas, who saw the car in person, describes it as a super cool ride. The seller, @hangarcountry (The Seller), highlights that the motor has been fully rebuilt and has less than 500 miles on it, with additional positive comments about the tires being new and the car riding beautifully. The presence of rare features like rear pop-out windows and winning a trophy at a local VW meet adds to the vehicle's charm.
Neutral: Comments also address some technical aspects and details of the vehicle. @DawsonVintage notes the potential concerns with paint quality based on photos, while @67COOP inquires about the cold start indicator. The seller clarifies that the car has been repainted, with specific areas still showing original paint, indicating that some wear is normal in high-contact regions. There's some discussion about the authenticity and classification of the vehicle, with @OnixBonilla explaining the differences between Brazilian Variants and Type 3 models, which adds context to the vehicle's identity.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns and criticisms. @Fredges expresses a desire to remove the faux wood vinyl from the dash, indicating dissatisfaction with its appearance. @mountainrev humorously suggests the need for additional cleaning supplies to address sticky remnants, making light of the situation. Additionally, @burkhard is concerned about the transaxle's lubricating needs, showcasing a focus on mechanical functionality. @JWHBOOMER questions the color matching of the driver's door, indicating possible mismatched paint, prompting the seller to clarify the repainting situation.
|
 |
Positive: @Jeepmike praised the vehicle, noting its excellent condition for the mileage and mentioning it had been well-driven and enjoyed. @Zand4re (The Seller) encourages potential buyers to engage with him directly, offering to arrange pre-purchase inspections and personal viewings to showcase the car’s features. He also emphasized the availability of auction updates and additional media to help potential buyers assess the car thoroughly.
Neutral: Several users, including @durn86 and @trussdevils, expressed concerns about the vehicle's compliance with California smog regulations and emissions tests, with @durn86 pointing out the limited mileage of only 3,000 in 23 years. @Zand4re (The Seller) responded to queries about the vehicle's specifications, including the passenger side exhaust issue and the lack of compliance due to long tube headers but assured interested parties that operationally, it should still pass smog testing aside from the modifications.
Negative: Comments from @kawtipping raised concerns about possible oil residue and the condition of the oil filter, questioning the cleanliness following various maintenance services. Similarly, @manofstealth and @borzy1 expressed doubts regarding the passenger side exhaust tip, seeking clarification about potential modifications or issues with the exhaust system. Overall, the concerns about current conditions and compliance with regulations reflect a cautious approach from some community members.
|
 |
Positive: @Gonzobanker described the vehicle as "Sweeeeeet!", indicating a positive reaction to its overall appearance. @wapsirat echoed this sentiment by complimenting the truck as a beautiful build. @worzie79 added to the positive comments by sharing his experience with a similar truck, noting that it drives in a fun way and that minor details can be easily addressed by the new owner, suggesting the vehicle has a solid foundation for customization.
Neutral: @Fastlane65 expressed some uncertainty about the build quality, noting that while he likes the look of the truck, he has concerns about the high-end parts being attached to an average frame and the overall finishing details. @Danny53 appreciated the truck's appearance as well, but asked if it was roadworthy, indicating an interest in its reliability rather than just aesthetics. The seller, @Motorcarsintl, responded to these inquiries with assurance of the truck's roadworthiness and provided insight into the vehicle's history and mechanical aspects.
Negative: @Fastlane65 raised numerous concerns regarding the vehicle's quality, mentioning issues such as the unfinished interior, visible wiring, and missing screws. He pointed out that the truck had many aspects that would require personal attention to meet his standards. Additionally, @1889 asked about the braking system, questioning whether it had a booster and its adequacy for driving, suggesting possible safety concerns. These comments reflect skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition that may deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @gardnpc praised the vehicle for its color combo, calling it a very nice example of an NC1. @rpmf08 also echoed this sentiment by highlighting the appealing color choices available for the NC Miata, while @SDCR noted that Mazda had offered excellent hues including Stormy Blue Mica and the one seen here, Highland Green Mica. Enthusiasts like @E92-C expressed admiration by highlighting their own purchase of a Nordic green model, emphasizing that low mileage examples are sought after, indicating the growing appreciation for the NC Miata as a fun and desirable car.
Neutral: Replies included shared enthusiasm about the model, with @Jdmytriw mentioning their experience with a similar NC1 and how it continues to provide great fun. Furthermore, @SDCR acknowledged that the NC retains the nimbleness of earlier models while offering improved features like higher horsepower and a roomier interior. @torelloamerican (The Seller) took the opportunity to welcome participants to the auction for the 2007 Miata and encouraged questions, showing engagement with the community.
Negative: Some concerns were raised, such as @wfoguy seeking clarification on the tire date code, indicating a potential issue or area of uncertainty. Additionally, @FlyWolf observed that a modification might have been made to the driver seat height, suggesting possible adaptations made for taller drivers but not necessarily in line with original specifications. These comments reflect a cautious attention to detail amidst the overall enthusiasm.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a generally positive sentiment toward the D2 vehicle, with @gxjglass (The Seller) expressing confidence in the truck's quality and condition. He highlights its solid construction, meticulous maintenance, and significant updates, such as replacements of crucial components including head gaskets and water pumps. @Mrhoppy admires the vehicle, appreciating its aesthetics and describing it as a "nice rig," while @ski.dive acknowledges its visual appeal despite expressing some initial concern about the vehicle's Carfax history.
Neutral: In the neutral commentary, @Rymac points out an inconsistency regarding the wheel size listed in the auction, prompting @bringatrailer to confirm that the listing has been updated accordingly. Both @ski.dive and @ahab engage in clarifying questions about the vehicle, with @ski.dive expressing concern over the number of previous owners and asking if there are any warning lights present, while @ahab inquires about a specific plug shown in the photographs, indicating curiosity without judgment. @gxjglass responds to these inquiries, ensuring transparency in communication and providing additional information about the vehicle's features.
Negative: Negative comments about the vehicle arise primarily from @ski.dive, who shows concern over the six previous owners indicated by the Carfax report, suggesting that it could imply issues in vehicle ownership history. The mention of the occasional SRS light by @gxjglass could also raise red flags for potential buyers, as it indicates that not all systems are working flawlessly. Overall, while there are minor critiques regarding maintenance history and functionality, they are not overwhelmingly negative and seem to be countered by the truck's overall solid reputation as described by the seller.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz praised the vehicle as a wonderful example, referring to it as "gold, Jerry gold!" @BigJimInTexas shared fond memories of owning similar cars, highlighting the Impala’s nostalgic value. @Kimmyrat (The Seller) enthusiastically discussed how much fun the car has been at shows over the years, expressing her sadness about selling it due to health issues but ensuring potential buyers of its great condition after years of careful maintenance. @southsideimports noted the car's aesthetic appeal and good quality, while @JMFJ described it as a "great looking car" and appreciated all the updates made to it. Additionally, @ToyBox1 humorously suggested a minor addition, implying it still meets the owner's high standards.
Neutral: @martinatCABT acknowledged the car's quality but suggested it needs a different set of wheels. @acorn19 reminisced about having a similar model and shared the enjoyment of owning such cars, but did not comment specifically on this vehicle's condition. @yoncey sought clarification about the vehicle's history and rust condition, indicating a practical concern over aesthetics. @southsideimports brought up mechanical inquiries, such as the paint rating and engine history, suggesting a cautious interest in the car's operational status without expressing strong opinions either way.
Negative: @knucklehead_61 expressed a strong negative opinion about various aspects of the Impala's design, finding certain trims and colors unappealing. @yoncey, while asking valuable questions, expressed suspicion about rust potentially being hidden underneath the diamond plate, raising concerns about the vehicle's integrity. Overall, these comments signal some skepticism among potential buyers about the condition of the vehicle despite positive sentiments from others.
|
 |
Positive: @esiedlecki finds the bike beautiful and appreciates the excellent upgrades and modifications, expressing a wish to own one if not for limited storage. @RobBob911 shares a glowing overview of the bike's performance, calling it smooth, strong, and reliable, noting that he personally enjoys his CB1100 with no plans to sell. @CB1100 (The Seller) mentions the quality of the color-matched red side covers, stating they were sourced from Japan and enhances the aesthetic appeal of the motorcycle.
Neutral: @shoggy1970 reminisces about a previous color of the bike, indicating a fondness for the metallic red. @CB1100 (The Seller) provides practical information about recent maintenance, such as oil change and chain lubrication. Queries from users, such as @VSC and @Paradox, focus on technical specifications and performance tweaks, indicating an interest in the bike's tuning and gearing options without providing strong opinions.
Negative: @trailerjoe humorously discusses the challenges of vehicle storage, hinting at frustration over limited space and personal finances affecting garage plans. @Kasindy brings up past experiences with ECU remapping that led to performance issues, expressing skepticism about the legality and efficacy of modifications, while noting potential concerns with emissions compliance. These comments suggest a cautious perspective regarding vehicle modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @ChristopherM3 expressed excitement about the car's Vibrant White color, noting it was rare compared to Oxford White. He also mentioned his previous ownership experience with a similar model and wished luck for the auction. @96Impala (The Seller) shared that the car is in amazing condition, running perfectly, and has been well-kept and garaged its entire life. Several commenters noted that all windows, air conditioning, and audio systems were functioning well, which adds to the appeal of the vehicle.
Neutral: @Dangermiller provided insights into the horsepower ratings for the 1993 model year, adding that the factory had lowered it from 225 to 205, indicating a marketing strategy with the upcoming 1994 models. @Motordad8 confirmed the horsepower details and acknowledged Vibrant White as the correct color for the year. @Gr865 inquired about various functionalities of the car, and @Markholland requested photographs of important VIN tags to verify authenticity, indicating a general interest in the car's history and details.
Negative: @Z282SLO critiqued @96Impala's claim that the car is completely original, highlighting possible replaced components such as the radio, alternator, and mufflers, which undermines the original claim. @reflectorj noted concerns about paint quality, suggesting that flaws may be hidden due to the color and photo saturation. @J353 and @Floydcaz raised additional concerns about the potential for bodywork or damage, particularly focusing on a specific area of the vehicle and a rip in the passenger seat.
|
Exomod Concepts 2022 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat C69 Carbon
2C3CDZC99NH191800
Lot 219643
Private Party
 |
Positive: @HotVette expresses admiration for the vehicle, specifically requesting a version in orange with a southern flag and '01' on the doors, indicating a strong interest in customization. @Mkohl97 commended the workmanship with a 'Well done! Glwts,' showing appreciation without hesitation. @Caymanorcarrera is typically not into muscle cars but finds this one exceptional, noting its beauty with an emoji to convey strong feelings. @Paul6200 was wowed, exclaiming the car is awesome and expressing intent to ring the bell for it. @UNFORGIVEN1 echoed these sentiments with a 'WOW WOW WOW!!!!!' and wished luck on the sale. @MitchHungLynch praised the carbon fiber designs by Exomod and conveyed admiration for the power under the hood, deeming it a top-notch achievement. @dawgeq87 described it as an excellent piece of art, indicating a level of awe, and @Boosted1 noted the thoughtful execution of the vehicle's design.
Neutral: @Boyhowdee inquired about the car's weight and asked if the carbon fiber body made a significant difference, which suggests curiosity about the engineering involved. @GaryCase raised a concern regarding possible scratches, asking about specific images but did not express clear positive or negative feelings about the overall vehicle. @gwn mentioned that the vehicle is awesome while also highlighting the excellence of the hood scoop, showing a balanced view of the components. @parshooter liked the look of the car but expressed some dissatisfaction with the entire exposed carbon fiber aesthetic, slightly tempering their enthusiasm for the design.
Negative: @Tyracious provided a somewhat critical comment, suggesting the vehicle's flat black primer and wheels are understated and hinting that it may require more flair. Meanwhile, @Assam criticized the proportions typically found in similar vehicles but redeemed the car by stating it looks exceptionally good, revealing a mixed opinion on muscle car design. Lastly, @bud55555 (The Seller) expressed regret about not being able to keep the Exomod Charger due to space limitations, which inadvertently suggests dissatisfaction with the situation rather than the car itself.
|
|
|
Positive: The seller, @esoteriklaundry, shows a proactive approach to customer inquiries and support, welcoming potential buyers and offering to stand by for any questions throughout the week. This level of engagement has been noted positively, particularly with the capability to easily open the awning and its adjustable legs which enhance functionality. Additionally, @kevinorme expresses admiration for their own similar vehicle, praising features such as the granny gear, which allows for easy rocking in case of getting stuck. The overall impression is one of a well-designed and functional vehicle that seems to have a dedicated community of enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and features have been raised within the comments. For instance, @900TR00VIGC asks about the vehicle's power and torque ratings, to which @esoteriklaundry confirms it has 95 horsepower and 117 lb-ft of torque. Ground clearance is also a point of interest, with @esoteriklaundry mentioning it is 11 inches to the engine guard. The seller addresses concerns about the vehicle's front differential noises, stating it has a consistent whirring sound without any grinding, providing potential buyers with clarity on these mechanical details.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's A/C system, specifically pointing out that while the compressor remains, the interior A/C ducting has been removed, as noted by @sologringoLBC. This has elicited questions about the feasibility of restoring the air conditioning. Another issue highlighted is the noise from the front differential, with users like @900TR00VIGC speculating on possible causes, which could point to a potential concern for buyers wary of mechanical maintenance. The need for further clarification and additional photos to address these concerns has also been expressed, indicating some apprehension among potential customers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commentators have expressed their admiration for the SUV, noting it as one of the ultimate models available. @Gloccamora highlights the vehicle's appeal with an enthusiastic "GLWTA!", while @land_shark3 praised its beautiful design after seeing an ivory variant. Users like @Tigers196884 and @RenegadeRoller share similar sentiments, emphasizing the vehicle's impressive engine performance and overall driving experience. Additionally, @Rgw appreciates the vehicle's features and has had a positive personal experience with a similar model, mentioning it remains a favorite in their household.
Neutral: Several users have raised enquiries about the vehicle's features and specifications. @Americalpm inquired about the absence of SuperCruise, while @AKP sought clarification on potential engine recalls related to the 6.2 V8 engine. @nexusautobrokers also noted the lack of certain desired options like a console fridge, expressing disappointment but acknowledging the vehicle's overall strength. @Bkingdole mentioned the vehicle's unusual journey from South Carolina to Arizona and sought clarity on its mileage claims, indicating curiosity about the logistics behind the sale.
Negative: On the downside, some comments reflect concerns regarding the vehicle's features that may affect resale value. @nexusautobrokers criticized the lack of SuperCruise and a fridge, describing them as deal-breakers despite recognizing the truck's capabilities. @Techdude99 commented on disappointing details regarding the express up rear windows option, while @SPTUCKER77 shared a negative experience related to an engine issue on their wife’s vehicle, although it was resolved with a warranty replacement. Such experiences contribute to a mixed perception of the vehicle, showcasing both its strengths and potential drawbacks.
|
 |
Positive: @Pontiacs4evr appreciates the vehicle's unique features, noting it as a "nice little truk" and expressing a desire for it to remain in its current state. @fehrenbacker (The Seller) highlights the Bronco's status as a true survivor, mentioning his enjoyment of taking it to car shows and coffee shops over the years. Additionally, @fehrenbacker emphasizes the Bronco's clean and uncut fenders, which are typically problematic for other vehicles of this model.
Neutral: @fehrenbacker (The Seller) actively invites potential buyers to reach out with questions or requests for more pictures, demonstrating a willingness to engage with interested parties. This communication sets a friendly tone and shows the seller's commitment to showcasing the vehicle's condition and features. @TSMiller shares nostalgic memories of owning a similar model, recalling affection for his first Bronco, which adds emotional depth to the comments without detracting from the vehicle's current appeal.
Negative: There are no significant negative comments regarding the vehicle in the provided responses. The tone throughout remains positive and nostalgic, as commenters reflect on their experiences and the unique qualities of the Bronco. The absence of concerns suggests a favorable impression of the vehicle's current state and its historical significance among enthusiasts.
|
 |
Positive: @a240Z2NV describes the vehicle as a "BEAUTIFUL example!" which highlights its impressive aesthetics. @rut3556 shares their positive experience, stating they have had two wonderful bikes and praise the engine, referring to it as one of the best motors BMW ever built. @i_Fly36 expresses enthusiasm for the bike, hoping to acquire one in the near future. Furthermore, the seller, @Antdelario, provides continuous updates about the bike's condition, adding more pictures and confirming that the motorcycle is running beautifully and is ready for the next owner to enjoy.
Neutral: @LaneFM inquires about the availability of the original travel cases that typically come with this model. The seller, @Antdelario, responds that they do not have the cases but mentions the possibility of providing two white ones instead. @lancedance asks about the last servicing of the rear drive, and @Antdelario confirms that the final drive oil was recently changed and lubricated. The seller also shares updates on the installation of a missing turn signal, indicating they are actively maintaining the bike and keeping potential buyers informed.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: @Richard17 describes the vehicle as possibly the coolest thing he has ever seen, conveying strong admiration for its design. @Green_Meanie echoes this sentiment, calling the car amazing and noting that it should have ended its auction closer to Halloween for thematic relevance. @John_Henry refers to it as a vehicle to die for, while @MasterDebator states that it offers a stylish way to make a final exit. @Johnny1eye humorously expresses his awe, and @RBBGroup reflects that even death was once grander, showcasing a nostalgic appreciation for the car's vintage allure.
Neutral: @Cwauto (The Seller) responds to comments about the paint's description, assuring potential buyers that there are no imperfections and attributing any variations to lighting. @NickB shares a light-hearted take on paint contrast while reminiscing about simpler times in car painting, complementing the car's suitability for its intended purpose. @Hoppy18 even playfully suggests that a new film starring this hearse could be entertaining, highlighting a blend of nostalgia and humor surrounding the vehicle.
Negative: @39mercman expresses disappointment with the previous buyer's failure to follow through on their purchase, indicating a lack of commitment and integrity. @Knuckles-R-Busted acknowledges the beauty of the vehicle but understands the practical challenges it poses during solemn occasions, hinting at its inappropriateness at times. @DFWcarandtoymuseum notes the difficulty in achieving a sale beyond the previous bid, emphasizing the need for new bidders to reach a fair price.
|
|
|
Positive: Commenters have expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with many praising its stunning color and overall beauty. @Tudor303 resonated with the aesthetics, emphasizing that the interior complements the exterior perfectly. @Charleetuner and @yenko133 also acknowledged the eye-catching combination of colors, with @Charleetuner even evoking a sense of nostalgia, associating the appearance with enjoying Carolina BBQ and a Dr Pepper. The seller, @ClassicJack123, responded positively to these comments, acknowledging the car's uniqueness and quality while mentioning the favorable reactions it has garnered in person.
Neutral: There were inquiries regarding technical specifications and functionality. Notably, @Worldclassmotorcarsny asked about the presence of air conditioning in the vehicle, which @ClassicJack123 clarified by stating there is no A/C but emphasized the effectiveness of the working vent windows. Additionally, @AJJhawk sought clarification on the engine's year, prompting @ClassicJack123 to provide context about the LS3 engine sourced from a 2015 Camaro, noting its clean condition and low mileage.
Negative: The comments did not exhibit any overtly negative feedback regarding the vehicle. However, some comments like the inquiries about air conditioning could imply a slight disappointment from potential bidders who prioritize comfort features. Additionally, there were indications of anticipation for driving videos and action shots, suggesting that until these are visible, some commenters remain in a wait-and-see mode regarding their final assessment of the vehicle's performance.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the aesthetic qualities of the Panamera, highlighting features such as the stunning Cherry Metallic color, which was noted specifically by @URS6 and @SingleClutch. @bonedaddy16 also praised the remarkable extra legroom provided by the rear seats, enhancing the car's appeal as a road car. Detailed descriptions of the vehicle's engineering and driving experience further underscore its positive traits, with @Iswearits4mywife praising the model for its blend of luxury and performance, especially in Sport Plus mode.
Neutral: There was a mix of clarification and factual corrections regarding the vehicle's features and specifications. @BellArTrain pointed out that the Panamera is not the Executive version, describing potential misconceptions about the term. The seller, @benster, provided details about the car, including its current ownership status, past services, and warranty information. General inquiries about key availability, specific features like the Surround View and Head Up Display were addressed, contributing to a better understanding of the vehicle's current condition and features.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's features and availability of options. @wwein expressed frustrations about the availability of the Executive version in the USA, indicating a perception of a missed opportunity. Questions from @wellisntthisfun regarding the number of keys and potential issues suggested a desire for more transparency about the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @MCTECH questioned the color matching of the seats and door cards, prompting doubts about the consistency of the interior's appearance.
|
1969 Chevrolet Corvette Convertible L71 427/435 M40 Automatic
194679S710451
Lot 219658
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive features and aesthetics. @johnnyvett described it as a super nice example, praising its well-optioned L71 status and encouraged others with "GLWTA" (Good Luck With The Auction). @Tobyallen appreciated the car's stance and shared reflections on aging, noting that an automatic transmission fits the high horsepower of this car, emphasizing flexibility in driving. @RecoveringAtty enjoyed the sound of the big block V8 engine, likening it to memorable pop culture references like Ghostbusters, and @stugottz complimented the car's appearance, especially with side pipes, mentioning that the '69 model looks particularly fantastic.
Neutral: A range of neutral comments emerged regarding the vehicle's specifications and features. @1969L88 clarified transmission details, prompting @GBRBiLL to thank @johnnyvett for elucidating the M40 code. Some commenters pondered various aspects of the car, such as whether it still had its original components like the six-bolt converter, and discussed the rarity of parts like the idle solenoid. The seller, @Jolstaddrj, contributed to the conversation by addressing inquiries about the vehicle's features, previous modifications, and the current condition of various components, while also providing context about the vehicle's restoration history and current state.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, some negative comments pointed out concerns about missing original components and potential inconsistencies. @1969L88 noted the absence of an idle stop solenoid, expressing concern over its difficulty to find, while @1953rms questioned the replacement of cylinder heads instead of rebuilding the originals, suggesting it was unusual. The seller, @Jolstaddrj, responded to these critiques, detailing the reasons for changes made to the vehicle and the parts used, indicating the challenges of sourcing original specifications. Commenters like @Noisyboyz expressed nostalgia over features that were no longer available, hinting at a deeper longing for the classic elements of the Corvette that were changed or removed.
|
 |
Positive: @bwcollier shared a nostalgic story about purchasing the car, tied to fond memories of their father's 91 Seville. This connection adds sentimental value to the vehicle for the seller. @lincolnsandcaddies and @boratdi also expressed appreciation for the model, noting that the Seville is a great car and emphasizing the nostalgic aspect of owning such vehicles. @Tampanews pointed out the unique styling of the Seville, which has grown on them over time, noting its intricate design that sets it apart from other vehicles.
Neutral: Several commenters questioned the short ownership duration of the vehicle, with @carfan1978, @Ramenator, and @RJAPPRAISE wondering if something went wrong shortly after the previous sale. @malimd inquired about the functions of the car, seeking specifics about any issues encountered by @bwcollier during their brief ownership. @GP65 requested additional details regarding past repairs and specifics about the brake work that had been done.
Negative: However, concerns arose regarding the vehicle's condition and previous ownership history. @Ramenator, @snagy, and @Craven noted suspicions about potential undisclosed issues with the car, such as oil leaks or valve problems. @Mezgrrrrr asked about an unexpected chiming noise when using the turn signal, highlighting possible quirks of the car that may need attention. User @AdamMo humorously suggested that this could also be due to ease of maintenance, hinting at potential oversight in upkeep during ownership.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlighted the excellent condition of the 2006 Kawasaki KX85, with @KP-ILOVEMYTOYS (The Seller) noting that the bike has been well-maintained, stored in a temperature-controlled garage, and runs like new. The seller emphasized that it is perfect for young riders looking for a solid MX bike or a fun backyard ride, and described it as a lightly used model that has only ever been for casual riding rather than racing. Commenters like @Djtanta expressed enthusiasm for the bike, seeing it as a potential Christmas surprise for their son, reflecting fond memories of bikes from their own childhood.
Neutral: The seller provided detailed information about the bike's specifications, including the differences between the A6 and B6 models. @KP-ILOVEMYTOYS (The Seller) shared insights into the bike's servicing, mentioning all OEM parts were used in the recent full service. The seller invited potential buyers to reach out for any inquiries or additional information and noted the number of views and watchers on the auction, indicating interest among bidders.
Negative: While there were no directly negative comments about the bike itself, some users like @skyancher reminisced about their childhood bikes, implying a certain nostalgia that may highlight the KX85's dated appeal compared to modern models. There were concerns about potential bidding mechanics, with @KP-ILOVEMYTOYS (The Seller) cautioning bidders about the risks associated with internet connection issues that could prevent timely bidding, suggesting uncertainty regarding the auction process.
|
Supercharged 2021 Toyota Land Cruiser URJ200 Heritage Edition
JTMCY7AJ2M4097819
Lot 219573
Private Party
 |
Positive: The vehicle is appreciated for its rarity and features, including being a last-year production model of the LC with a Harrop supercharger, which typically enhances its power to around 550hp and 550tq. Commenters like @CRUSH express excitement about its impressive specifications, while @Aardvark27 praises it as an "unbelievable specimen." The seller, @janglekid72, is noted for being responsive and providing answers to various queries, enhancing confidence in the vehicle's value and condition. Additionally, other enthusiasts, such as @Supraman, share their admiration for the vehicle's build quality, likening it to their favorite models from the 90s.
Neutral: Several commenters seek further clarification on various aspects of the vehicle. @Mbalcos raises concerns regarding the accuracy of the heritage edition claims based on photographs, while others like @rgeorge15 and @CDemis request additional documentation and photos to better understand the vehicle's condition and repairs. @janglekid72, the seller, attempts to address these inquiries by mentioning the inclusion of invoices, original manuals, and upcoming photos to verify the vehicle's state. There is also a discussion about the tire size and suspension components, with clarifications provided to ensure transparency in the vehicle's description and history.
Negative: There are several concerns expressed by potential buyers regarding the vehicle's history and condition. @Tex1979 doubts the seller's price based on perceived damage and the state of the driver's seat, while @johnshroe sarcastically questions the plausibility of the seller not having photographic evidence of the claimed "parking lot damage." Additionally, @terdrocket points out a discrepancy regarding the winch specification, suggesting possible oversights in the listing. @rgeorge15's repeated inquiries about the vehicle's off-road use and undercarriage condition imply skepticism about its past usage, fueling doubts among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's impressive build and modifications. @ScottinNC described it as a 'fantastic build,' while @Sarki noted that 'Audi nailed it' with the aesthetics, highlighting the simple beauty of the Rotor wheels. @Mfwhitlock and @TNSNE1 echoed these sentiments, praising the tasteful upgrades and the overall attractiveness of the car. The vehicle's appeal is further emphasized by @eLmariachi's lighthearted comment about it being a great daily driver, along with @DUGEEEFRESH04's remark about it being 'well loved.' Overall, the consensus among enthusiasts is that this Audi A4 Avant is a desirable choice for Audi fans.
Neutral: The seller, @elevationmotors, provided detailed information about the car, responding to various queries regarding modifications and maintenance records. They confirmed that the car has a Titanium Package and mentioned the presence of a Black Forest shift knob, albeit replaced with an OEM one. Additionally, @elevationmotors indicated that all electric seat functions work, including heating, and they assured potential buyers that the vehicle has passed the necessary inspections for local emissions. They also confirmed that a driving video will be uploaded soon, which will showcase the vehicle's performance.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's history and condition were raised by several commenters. @Nvoisine inquired about accidents recorded on the car's history, and @RJ pointed out discrepancies in maintenance documentation, particularly regarding the timing belt and overall service records. @Nhskibm echoed these worries about the vehicle's service history, questioning the lack of documentation for key upgrades like the turbo and tune. @StillNSFW noted the presence of orange peel in the paint, raising further doubts about its overall condition. These comments reflect a level of skepticism among potential buyers, emphasizing the necessity for clarity on the vehicle's maintenance and repair history.
|
 |
Positive: The overall reception of the 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML350 4MATIC is quite favorable, highlighting its well-preserved condition and low mileage of just 39k. @MJLMotorcars, the seller, emphasizes that the vehicle has been meticulously maintained by the original owner and has a spotless Carfax. Additionally, the clean and honest presentation of the car, combined with its smooth mechanical operation and several desirable features like heated seats, a sunroof, and bi-xenon headlights, further enhances its appeal. Commenters express appreciation for the seller's thorough responses to inquiries, particularly regarding features like Keyless-Go, which is fully functional.
Neutral: Inquiries about the vehicle indicate a level of scrutiny typical for buyers interested in a high-end SUV. @Joeybenz asks for the window sticker and paint measurements, while @stevet47 points out minor imperfections such as paint chips and a notable scratch on the rear wheel arch. The seller addresses these concerns transparently, indicating that touch-up paint will be applied before sale. Some comments also clarify the condition of the tires and the state of the brakes, confirming that these components have been adequately maintained despite the low mileage, and that the original manual practices of the dealer may not always be fully reflected in Carfax reports.
Negative: On the downside, some potential buyers have voiced concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @stevet47 notes the age of the tires, suggesting they might be overdue for replacement despite having good tread. @Smithabq raises questions about the state of critical components including the battery and engine mounts, reflecting doubts about the overall maintenance of the vehicle. Additionally, @cabsclassics points out inconsistencies between service records and tire tread usage. This highlights a cautious approach among commenters, who are keen on verifying the car's condition before making a decision.
|
 |
Positive: @shelbyhertz2006 commented on how the vehicle makes him nostalgic for Jill Wagner, while @scoutdrivintexan mentioned having driven two similar models as company cars and appreciated their good power and driving experience, despite some transmission issues as they approached 100k miles. @froomg noted that the champagne color has aged beautifully and called it a classy Mercury. @Mustang3132 shared that a similar car was an excellent choice for his daughter, emphasizing its comfort and reliability, and expressed interest in potentially buying another. @nsxnick highlighted the engine’s reliability, and @TheD0k praised its straightforward interior design and durable engineering.
Neutral: @Thaddeus_P remarked on seeing one while driving, initially mistaking it for a different model, but recognizing it for its rarity. @aSingh39 (The Seller) provided information about the auction and encouraged questions regarding the car, which is being marketed as a low mileage item. @mklabenjr inquired about pictures of the car’s underside, illustrating potential interest in its condition, while @AZCanyon asked about the original tires' date codes, indicating a concern for authenticity.
Negative: @Dleebr questioned the tire's date code, suggesting some concern about the tire's age impacting the vehicle's quality. @LKODEN probed into potential cosmetic or mechanical issues, which indicates a skeptical perspective about the car's integrity, prompting @aSingh39 (The Seller) to assure that there were no issues and that the car performed and looked well for its mileage. @Ramenator pointed out that the car might be too far for him, indicating logistical challenges.
|
2015 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Convertible 3LZ Callaway SC757
1G1YU3D60F5603350
Lot 219670
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters express excitement about the vehicle, highlighting the enjoyment it has provided to its previous owner. @TheBlueBeast mentions that 'somebody had a great time', emphasizing its fun aspect. @Mike21061 (The Seller) notes that the car looks and runs great, having just passed a full inspection with no issues reported. @notlikelytowin4 appreciates that the vehicle has seen some use, which can suggest reliability and a well-maintained condition.
Neutral: There are various questions and concerns about the authenticity and documentation associated with the vehicle. @Vince2730 seeks clarification on the presence of the Callaway production number and mentions the importance of original paperwork to establish the vehicle's authenticity. @XS29L9B adds that Callaway cars, especially in recent models, do not have sequence numbers and notes that the car looks nice but critiques the addition of 757 badges that were not part of the original delivery.
Negative: Some comments reveal skepticism regarding the vehicle's authenticity and the lack of documentation. @Vince2730 expresses doubts about the obscured Callaway badge in the pictures and emphasizes the significance of having thorough documentation to confirm the vehicle's provenance. He finds it puzzling that the previous owner did not retain original Callaway documents but kept the owner's manual instead. Additionally, he questions whether the vehicle is a factory build or an aftermarket modification, stating that clarity on this matter is crucial for determining its value.
|
 |
Positive: Some users are engaged in the conversation seeking clarity about the vehicle's features, indicating interest in its details. For instance, @onojoe expresses curiosity regarding whether the vehicle is a short bed, suggesting a level of engagement and interest in its specifications.
Neutral: @shanem38 inquires about the build sheet in the glove box, which indicates a desire for more detailed information about the vehicle's history. @PSFarm questions the condition of the front bumper, which may imply a need for clarification on the vehicle's exterior.
Negative: There are concerns regarding the vehicle's parts and modifications, with @shanem38 pointing out potential changes to the rivets on the VIN tag, which could indicate alterations that raise questions about authenticity. Additionally, @PSFarm's question about the front bumper suggests dissatisfaction or concern about the vehicle's aesthetic condition.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the excellent maintenance and condition of the vehicle, with @Agate991.1 noting a solid Carfax history and confirmed upgrades like the timing belt completed by Volvo. @dmacrone points out desirable features such as the navigation option, full-size spare, and Polestar upgrade, which enhance the car’s appeal. Furthermore, @Agate991.1 describes the C70 as a great safe car with a quiet hardtop that is fun to drive, mentioning they have owned multiple models and found them enjoyable for cruising.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding specific features and enhancements, with @jwcunningham65 inquiring about the changes to the interior and @Vw.dodge asking about the Polestar optimization and its activation. @threevalves poses questions about the overall driving experience, maintenance, and whether the C70 is a good vehicle to own. These comments reflect a mix of curiosity and the need for more information from the seller and other knowledgeable users.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about modifications and potential issues, with @Agate991.1 advising buyers to change rear control arms and lower radiator hoses and mentioning how these components can affect tire wear if not addressed. @Vw.dodge expresses confusion over the absence of the Polestar badge and information in the window sticker, leading to doubts about the car's enhancements. Additionally, @Agate991.1 reiterates that while the C70 is a comfortable car, its performance is more focused on cruising rather than sportiness, which might deter performance enthusiasts.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received significant praise for its quality and aesthetics. @borninthe60s described the Fairlane as stunning, particularly noting the striking red color scheme that stands out. The seller, @alexg182, emphasized the car's excellent condition and performance, stating that it runs superbly and highlighting the more than $25K investment made by the owner in its various components. Additionally, the car is described as a rare gem from the Southwest, further contributing to its appeal to collectors.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed curiosity about the engine specifications and history. @BobCockrell and @mike_rockwell raised specific inquiries regarding the details of the engine rebuild and its components, such as the compression ratio and casting numbers, emphasizing the importance of this information for prospective buyers. @alexg182 has attempted to provide answers and has committed to obtaining more information about the engine and its work, illustrating transparency and engagement in the auction process.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects, there were concerns about the lack of comprehensive documentation related to the engine work and history. @BobCockrell noted that the provenance of the car may be clouded, which could be a drawback for buyers seeking detailed background on the vehicle. @alexg182 acknowledged this issue but maintained that the car is a quality restomod. The inability to provide definitive documentation could deter some potential bidders who prioritize verified histories.
|
 |
Positive: @AutobarnCollection expressed excitement about the 2008 BMW M3 e93, highlighting its exceptional cleanliness, great driving experience, and the included original wheels and tires. @ripper996 commented positively on the aftermarket Apex wheels, stating they complement the car well and acknowledging the seller's good work. @nba19002 shared their personal experience with a similar M3, praising its performance, comfort, and value, referring to it as part of BMW's 'golden years' due to its powerful V8 engine.
Neutral: @AutobarnCollection responded to inquiries regarding maintenance by mentioning that the car has been maintained to a high standard, while also advising that rod bearings might be a good investment despite low failure rates. @smokintr6 inquired about dents on the passenger door jam and the difference in driving between the convertible and coupe versions, to which the seller noted the dents were likely correctable and that the convertible drove well without significant differences. @outrunner asked about the condition and installation date of the wheels, and the seller confirmed they were added in 2019 and are in excellent condition, while also clarifying that original wheels are included in the auction.
Negative: @smokintr6 raised concerns about the dents in the passenger door jam, questioning whether they were caused by the seatbelt buckle or another issue. @JShue brought up potential engine problems related to spark plug replacements within a short mileage span, indicating possible reliability issues. This highlights a cautious outlook among prospective buyers regarding the vehicle's past maintenance and current condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many users appreciate the vehicle's aesthetics and unique color, with @jchouston expressing love for the blue finish that reminds them of Oilers fans. @luxuryautomax referred to it as a "Great Rig!!!" and noted the competitive nature of the bidding, showcasing enthusiasm for the vehicle's appeal. The seller, @dmciver, emphasizes the vehicle's potential as a solid investment, sharing positive experiences with insurance coverage through Hagerty and its low annual premium, which others seem interested in as well.
Neutral: The seller, @dmciver, provides detailed responses to questions about the vehicle's condition and modifications, indicating a willingness to engage with potential buyers. @toddkanderson and @Adodero discuss insurance options that align with the unique ownership situation of the vehicle, highlighting the importance of having another daily driver for policy eligibility. There's an acknowledgment of the vehicle's quirks, shared in @dmciver's narrative about his quick sale and insurance experience, which reflects the complexities of owning and selling such vintage models.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition, specifically mentioning rust by @Willows, which could be a drawback for potential buyers. Additionally, @GMTNVin inquired about non-functional gauges due to the engine swap, revealing some of the vehicle's aftermarket modifications may not be fully compatible with original equipment, leading to potential functional issues. The seller has noted the slow functioning of wipers and a need for horn replacement, pointing to areas that could deter buyers looking for a fully reliable classic restored vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @NaijaNinja praised the listing and expressed interest in a startup and riding video to assess the vehicle's performance. @liambsullivan noted that the bike appears to be in great condition, wishing the seller good luck with the transaction. @skyancher shared a personal connection with Harley bikes, stating that their purchase of a 91' FXSTC was driven by a desire for a dream bike, reflecting the lasting appeal of the manufacturer.
Neutral: @Joed232 (The Seller) provided information about the bike, confirming that everything is Harley OEM and addressing several maintenance inquiries from potential buyers. The seller has indicated that the cam chain tensioner has not been serviced but reassured that all fluids were regularly changed, as evidenced by service records included in photos. Additionally, the seller offered to provide videos as requested by @NaijaNinja and @alexg182.
Negative: Concerns were raised by several commentators regarding the cam chain tensioner, with @JM6463 emphasizing the importance of routine inspections for this component and citing potential high service costs should replacements be necessary. There was a dialogue about the challenges of servicing older Harley models, with @HankDerb and @JM6463 discussing dealer support for such bikes and the implications of Harley's corporate decisions on parts availability, suggesting a lack of support for older motorcycles.
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) highlights that the 2009 BMW Z4 sDrive30i is in superb condition, noting that it has fresh oil and does not burn oil or leak. The seller also reassures potential buyers that any minor dents on the vehicle will be removed free of charge, and the interior has never been smoked in, which is a positive aspect for many car shoppers. Furthermore, @Collectibleclassics emphasizes their commitment to transparent transactions, boasting an impressive Google review score of 4.9 out of 5.0, indicating a strong reputation among previous customers.
Neutral: @Delfb1 raised valid questions about the vehicle's condition, asking about possible clutch slippage, oil leaks, and the cleanliness of the oil. This inquiry reflects a prospective buyer’s diligence in assessing the car’s maintenance history. Additionally, @Delfb1 noted the appearance of two small dents on the car's left front wheel arch. Another comment from @norseman provided information about BMW's oil level monitoring system, clarifying that the brand has used electronic sensors instead of traditional dipsticks since 2006, demonstrating an understanding of its engineering changes.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Delfb1 regarding the driver's seat leather potentially separating or showing signs of wear, as well as inquiries about any fluid weeping from the adaptive dampers. While @Collectibleclassics quickly addressed these concerns, stating there is no leaking and confirmed the seat's condition aside from slight color fading, the initial questions reflect common apprehensions that many buyers might have regarding wear and tear on used vehicles. The transparency in these discussions is crucial for buyers to feel confident in their purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @LH3726 shared an impressive note about his experience with a similar Mustang GT 2024 Supercharged, highlighting its exceptional performance that matches the latest Corvettes in track times, which adds credibility to the Mustang's performance capabilities. @royroddey appreciated the beauty of the car and reinforced confidence in the Ford Performance parts installed on the vehicle, indicating that the supercharger wouldn’t void the warranty when installed correctly. This suggests a well-thought-out approach to performance modifications.
Neutral: @Maddie025 (The Seller) mentioned that all aftermarket parts were installed by the Ford dealer and provided information about the supercharger kit's warranty, which showcases the seller's transparency regarding vehicle modifications. @Fatalvenom acknowledged the car's attractive features, particularly the color and wheels, even though he expressed reservations about the overall design of the S650 model and felt it could have ventured beyond the previous S550 design. This reflective commentary provides a balanced view of the vehicle's aesthetics and design evolution.
Negative: However, @Fatalvenom’s critical perspective on the S650 being akin to a mere facelift of its predecessor signals a disappointment among some enthusiasts who expected more innovation. @dannyg80 inquired about documentation for the supercharger installation, which may indicate a concern about the legitimacy or future reliability of such aftermarket modifications. Lastly, @idling's offhand remark about the potential for paintless dent repair on a dent in the passenger door implies that not all aspects of the vehicle are perfect, indicating room for improvement in its condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praised the vehicle's unique color and overall appearance. @BMW23 noted the appealing combination and mentioned their own experience with factory-ordering a vehicle in a different shade. @Gastup69, the seller, highlighted the car's stunning San Marino blue, explaining that it reflects differently in various lighting conditions, creating a visually striking effect. They received compliments frequently, with people mistaking it for a much newer model, indicating its desireability. The recent application of a ceramic coating was mentioned, enhancing its shine and protective qualities, further elevating its appeal.
Neutral: Inquiries about the vehicle's condition and maintenance were common. @LincolnAMG asked about a repair area, prompting @Gastup69 to clarify that there were no lasting damages from a minor incident and that it was quickly resolved with a buffing. @Patriciogrc inquired about any mechanical issues, particularly regarding rod bearings, but @Gastup69 reassured that the vehicle is in immaculate condition and has no mechanical problems, stating it has only been used during warm months. The seller also mentioned plans to post a driving video, providing potential buyers insights into the vehicle's operational performance.
Negative: Despite overall positive comments, there were some concerns regarding service records. @rriviera asked if there were any maintenance records available after July 2017, which @Gastup69 addressed by stating that they have kept up with oil changes and other maintenance since purchasing the car in 2020. However, they admitted that much of the recent service work may not be documented in the Carfax report due to personal servicing done at home, which could cause potential buyers to question the vehicle's complete service history. This lack of official records may warrant further investigation from interested buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle for its appealing features and condition. @CRUSH noted that the truck is 'like new,' indicating a strong first impression. @genevamotorcars (The Seller) provided a reassuring response regarding the undercarriage, emphasizing that it is clean and not a concern, further substantiating the vehicle's good condition. @brooksgn highlighted the vehicle's unique color and described it as 'very good looking in person,' suggesting that it stands out positively against other models. The vehicle's options and specific configurations, such as the 6.4 foot bed and the premium features like Apple CarPlay, garnered appreciation from multiple users, contributing to a generally favorable view.
Neutral: Comments also reflected a mix of curiosity and requests for additional information about the vehicle. For instance, @Riceman33 inquired about the bed length and pictures of the Apple CarPlay functionality, indicating a desire for more details to aid potential buyers. @DUGEEEFRESH04 asked about real-world experiences related to the front middle seat, showing that prospective buyers were considering practicality as a factor in their decision-making process. The discussions also revolved around specific features such as the dual swing-out toolboxes and their practical usage, which suggest that buyers are evaluating the vehicle's versatility in real-world applications.
Negative: Despite several positive remarks, some comments raised concerns about corrosion and rust. @DLVRYMN pointed out that while the vehicle looks good on the surface, the undercarriage presented some worries about rust. @brooksgn corroborated this by commenting on the level of corrosion present and comparing it to a similar vehicle with fewer miles, indicating it may be an issue. Additionally, @wvt63 expressed concern about the amount of rust seen, coming from a different climate, suggesting that those unfamiliar with such conditions might be more apprehensive. Overall, while the majority of comments were positive, these nuances reveal that the rust issue was on some buyers' minds.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed appreciation for the Ferrari 458, praising its driving capability and aesthetic appeal. @dreamiata highlighted it as a great choice for someone who enjoys driving, while @gtaylorwill and @rmwcali celebrated its reputation and value retention in the market, indicating that the car is likely to appreciate over time. @alfriedesq noted the enjoyment of seeing such cars being used as intended, which adds to their charm.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on various details about the vehicle. @mitchell996 and @Mark635CSieuro inquired about the window sticker, interior modifications, service history, and current condition of certain components, including sticky buttons. @jforte78, the seller, provided detailed responses about the vehicle's OEM parts, service performed, and care taken to keep it in good condition, noting that while some features require minor attention, the car remains in pristine shape for its mileage.
Negative: On the flip side, there was skepticism regarding the seller's unwillingness to accommodate in-person inspections, with @Astonmartin66 and @mitchell996 expressing concerns that this might indicate something being concealed about the vehicle's condition. @Bsmuggs echoed this sentiment, suggesting that the seller's demeanor could potentially hinder successful sales. Comments also raised questions about the extent of wear and tear and the possibility of hidden issues, indicating a lack of confidence from some bidders regarding the car's overall transparency in the sale process.
|
 |
Positive: @gregorylv expressed a strong admiration for the vehicle, sharing that they owned a similar model with a 6-speed manual transmission, labeling it as one of the best cars they've had. They suggested the new owner upgrade the top to a newer model with a glass window for improved functionality, especially in colder climates, which they found to be a great enhancement. @MNKodiak appreciated the transparency from @BlueChipCar, the seller, for providing an honest overview of the Boxster, acknowledging that while it may be a bit rough, it has great potential with some care.
Neutral: @Adrian811 raised a query about the longevity of the triptronic transmission, specifically if it could endure abuse during track days. Additionally, @Jonfrancis inquired about potential issues with the IMS system in this model year and asked for the cost associated with replacing the convertible top and repairing the cover mechanism. @SoGi and @Mcest2025 both questioned the reason behind the airbag light being illuminated, with @BlueChipCar mentioning a possible faulty sensor based on previous experiences shared by other users.
Negative: @spydermr2 criticized the fact that another dealer was asking for payment for a bill of sale and title, noting this was common in Texas. @SoGi flatly stated they could not consider the car with the airbag light on, as it would not pass their state's safety inspection, indicating a significant red flag. Additionally, @MNKodiak cautioned that repairing or replacing the convertible top could range from $1,000 to $5,000, particularly given the extent of the current damages and issues, suggesting a potentially hefty investment for any prospective buyer.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the 1953 Packard Patrician for its stunning design and luxurious features. @SS6MT remarked on the beautiful automobile and its significance in Packard's history. @Dollycat3 emphasized the exceptional mid-century styling and craftsmanship, while @rlincoln shared their positive experience with the vehicle's smooth engine and mechanical reliability. @Capt._Doug commended the car's continuous dedication to engineering advancement and noted the quality of the design features, which are reflected in its elegant color and condition. Additionally, @MarkS expressed their admiration, calling it the best-looking of the '51-'54 Packard sedans and describing the driving experience as smooth.
Neutral: Commenters discussed the car's technical specifications and historical context without strong opinions. @scandaloT5 noted that the 1953 model is considered one of the best-looking Packards and mentioned the strong engine and availability of parts, highlighting the active community around the Packard brand. The seller, @2ndchancemotors, shared the background of the car's collection, emphasizing its proper maintenance and good function. Others like @studejack reflected on their own experiences with similar models, suggesting varying fuel efficiency, which indicates that performance can vary among different vehicles.
Negative: Some commenters pointed out potential downsides of the 1953 Packard Patrician. @capt-j1111 cautioned that the vehicle does not have power steering, which could affect driving ease. @rlincoln and @studejack both mentioned the car's poor fuel efficiency, with @rlincoln citing typical mileage around 7.8 on city roads and 10 on the highway, despite @studejack recalling a better experience with his Executive Sedan model. Concerns about rust and the vehicle's complexity also arose in discussions, indicating that while the car is a beautiful piece of automotive history, it comes with certain challenges as well.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the car's aesthetic and performance, with @shabah210 praising its reliability and the joy it brings after two decades of ownership. @jeffward25 remarked on the attractive black-on-red color combo, predicting strong bidding due to its appeal. @Fly160 described the vehicle as beautiful, expressing confidence that the auction will attract a satisfied buyer. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) emphasizes the vehicle's engaging driving experience, aiming to connect potential buyers with its exceptional qualities.
Neutral: Questions about the car's modifications and legality regarding emissions were prevalent. @2dr_enthusiast inquired about the decat status, while @Toxicarl and @Mcest2025 specifically raised concerns regarding legality in various states. @greentrees2 asked about potential odors related to the absence of catalytic converters, and the seller acknowledged these inquiries, confirming the car's current catless configuration while providing reassurances about its operational condition. Details regarding the vehicle's inspection history and features, such as a kill switch, were also shared by @Collectibleclassics (The Seller).
Negative: Some commenters expressed reservations regarding the legality of the vehicle's modifications. @Mcest2025 voiced concerns about emissions testing in Arizona, where catless vehicles would fail inspection. Others, like @ddlyle, sought clarification about potential emissions-related issues and were left uncertain by the seller's responses. Additionally, the lack of definitive documentation regarding the catalytic converter modifications left some bidders feeling hesitant, as indicated by the questions about possible warnings or performance issues with the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express nostalgic affection for the Z600, recalling how it was a unique and fun car during its time. @kaarekness describes it as a "fun/funky little rig," while @JoeMommia shares a fond memory of seeing a similar car in 1971, highlighting its coolness. @Vanthrax recalls his own experience with a Z600, describing it as a well-built car that brought him joy and good gas mileage, reminiscing about the laughs it generated with a humorous bumper sticker.
Neutral: The auction details shared by @Honda4me indicate that the Z600 has sat unused in a showroom since 2008, with an attempt to start it revealing issues with the carburetor. Comments from users like @JIMMY and @WW711 raise questions about the dealership's ability to repair the car or why they haven't had it running before the auction, reflecting a sense of concern over its status. Additionally, @Lindsay offers helpful advice to potential bidders on where to find replacement parts for the carburetor, demonstrating community support around the vehicle's maintenance needs.
Negative: Some comments cast doubt on the auction's appeal due to the car's non-running condition. @WW711 voices frustration about the dealer's failure to repair the carb, suggesting that it would negatively impact auction success. @Vanthrax also shares disappointment, asserting that if the car were running, it could fetch significantly higher bids, while @stev3po emphasizes the difference between just being "running" and being safe to drive, indicating that without proper work, the Z600's appeal and value may not be fully realized.
|
 |
Positive: @Ramenator praised the vehicle for appearing showroom floor flawless after 12 years, highlighting its excellent condition. @iancoletx chimed in to say they had never seen a car with 42k miles that was this clean, indicating the vehicle's well-maintained state. The Seller (@SVMGA) mentioned that the vehicle had a VIP owner who took it to the dealer annually for service, further enhancing perceptions of its upkeep.
Neutral: @The_Underhill_Account expressed enthusiasm about owning the car, referring to its capabilities for long trips and admiring the luxury muscle it offers. They also inquired about the number of keys and discussed the combination of different luxury features, appreciating the driver-focused aspects while suggesting an adjustment in listing accurate options for better bidding experience. Other users questioned various specifics, such as the infotainment options and potential additions like CarPlay.
Negative: @Obah requested to see pictures of accident damage, indicating a concern for past issues. @The_Underhill_Account raised doubts about the accuracy of the vehicle's listed features, pointing out that it may be "lightly optioned" and addressing discrepancies in advertised luxuries like rear seat massage and entertainment. @sl600 criticized maintenance costs, reflecting skepticism regarding quality versus expense, while @2doors expressed caution regarding trusting AI-generated options, emphasizing the need for accurate information to appropriately gauge the vehicle's value.
|
 |
Positive: @Bobclad describes the 2003 Dodge Viper SRT-10 as a beautiful car that consistently brings joy to its owner, noting that it puts a smile on their face each time they drive it. @bemrfst also appreciates the vehicle's low mileage, noting that it's a nice first year of the Gen 3 Viper, suggesting that it has been driven gently, maintaining its condition well.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics, the seller, provides detailed information about the vehicle, emphasizing its unique features and the dealership's commitment to smooth transactions. They invite potential buyers to schedule visits or inspections and note that they can assist with logistics. Additionally, they address inquiries regarding aftermarket items in the vehicle, including cruise control and radio modifications, indicating that further details will be shared soon.
Negative: On a less positive note, @19Superbird70 expresses disappointment that the car is not black, implying a preference for a different color. Furthermore, there are inquiries about the aftermarket radio and cruise control, with some commenters, like @lovebohn, seeking clarity on these modifications, suggesting that potential buyers may have concerns about the car's authenticity or original features.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters were largely impressed with the vehicle, praising its gorgeous appearance and luxurious features. @Bikeweekbaby expressed admiration for @Competitioncars' ability to find such remarkable examples. @LB1 commented that it was a 'gorgeous Fleetwood Brougham,' while @Brooklynight highlighted the car's perfect colors and plush interior, reminiscing about Cadillac's peak era. Many noted the low mileage as a significant selling point, with @CaddyCrazy calling it 'absolutely gorgeous' and expressing a desire to own it - showcasing the car's allure and appeal to classic car enthusiasts.
Neutral: Some comments posed questions or expressed curiosity about the vehicle's features and condition. @LeonVaughan inquired about specific options like an 8-track tape player, while @Ray_K asked for confirmation on the functionality of various components like the power antenna and air conditioning. Commenters such as @timweber and @Jagbuxx provided insights into the vehicle's vinyl top and paint, pointing out necessary corrections and historical accuracy regarding vehicle finishes, which added a layer of technical discussion among enthusiasts.
Negative: Conversely, a few comments raised concerns about the car's condition, specifically regarding the repainting and missing components. @Ray_K questioned the necessity for a complete paint job given the low mileage, suggesting potential discrepancies in the vehicle's upkeep. @Jagbuxx and @timweber highlighted issues regarding the vinyl top accuracy, while @ericdev mentioned missing door bumpers, indicating that attention to detail was needed to align it with expectations for a low-mileage classic. These negative aspects hint at a need for scrutiny by potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its stunning beauty and pristine condition. @mmilocco15 referred to it as 'the holy grail,' while @tagmotorsports highlighted its attractiveness. @billg993 appreciated the care taken by the original owner, and @4Rings specifically pointed out the rear wiper and overall beauty of the car. @MT911, a collector, also praised its excellent condition, stating it was one of the nicest examples he's seen of the model, while others like @dogasaur and @dougbrown described it as 'crazy awesome.'
Neutral: The seller, @HiTecAuto, provided several details about the car's history and condition. They confirmed the car has been well-maintained, kept in a climate-controlled environment, and that its low mileage (12,000 miles) is indicative of its condition. However, there were questions regarding the paintwork, with @CJBRSKL asking about the thickness differences found on certain parts of the car, as well as @Atab2870 inquiring about the absence of factory paint protection film. The seller clarified that the factory protection is indeed present, explaining the observations made by various commentors.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, there were some concerns raised by users regarding potential issues with the vehicle's maintenance. @mgernhar and @Jsilverhand questioned the car's oil consumption, with the latter noting a claim that it uses one quart of oil every 100 miles, which could indicate internal engine problems. @Darkisland commented on the design flaws that could lead to such issues, although the seller @HiTecAuto addressed these concerns by stating that the reported oil consumption was likely due to temporary mismanagement rather than a critical issue. Additionally, there were discussions about the car's ownership history and discrepancies in the Carfax report, prompting further clarification from the seller.
|
 |
Positive: @lloyddon1 (The Seller) presents an enticing overview of the 1972 Range Rover Series 88 post-restoration, emphasizing the extensive care and devotion that went into its nut and bolt restoration. The seller boasts about having spent $68k on the restoration and assures potential buyers that everything is brand new and better than new. Additionally, they highlight their willingness to make the buying process as enjoyable as possible, offering perks like covering round trip airfare for buyers and providing 24/7 availability for inquiries. Overall, the listing exudes confidence and excitement about the vehicle's quality and the enjoyable experience it promises.
Neutral: Commentors such as @carguy101 and @WAGONBOYTD express skepticism regarding certain technical aspects of the vehicle, particularly questioning the inclusion of electronic ignition in a diesel engine and the necessity of carburetor work on such an engine. These concerns suggest a level of confusion and concern about the authenticity of the restoration claims made by the seller. @CaptTA adds a critical note by pointing out that although $68k was spent on the restoration, some minor details, like the wiper blade, were neglected—raising doubts about the thoroughness of the restoration process.
Negative: Comments from @carguy101 and @WAGONBOYTD indicate significant doubts regarding the restoration process and the vehicle's specifications. They highlight the incongruity in the restoration work organized, questioning the necessity and accuracy of certain repairs and modifications made to a diesel engine. The mention of a scratched glass from a wiper arm not being replaced adds to the critics' concerns, which could potentially affect the vehicle's perceived value and the seller's credibility.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, particularly its unique Paint-to-Sample Golf Blue color and exquisite specifications. @boaboyoz described it as a 'groovy Golf Blue 991.2 GT3 Touring,' while @AlphaGTR praised its beautiful spec and the overall appearance: 'absolutely beautiful spec! Tasteful leather everything with the deviated stitching.' Additionally, @js3rs noted the car's potential for value appreciation, mentioning that it has 'just 1200 miles, CXX, and PTS in a good color.' The appreciation extends to the overall design and performance of the GT3 Touring, with multiple commenters acknowledging its exceptional driving experience.
Neutral: Several comments provide background information about the car and discuss specific options without forming a strong opinion about the vehicle. @Clay7484 highlighted the discussion around the unique build options of the car, while @Blairwarlock attempted to outline the CXX (Special Wishes) options to clarify the customization features. The comments also touch on the rarity of the 991.2 Touring model, with @Bruce911 indicating that the number of Tourings in the U.S. is limited, and discussing the driving experience associated with these vehicles across a few posts. The conversation showcases a blend of technical discussion and spec-related curiosity.
Negative: There were critical remarks regarding specific features of the car, particularly about the seats. @AlphaGTR commented on the base seats looking 'basic' compared to bucket seats, while @Klyphman expressed regret that only minimal mileage has been accumulated on a car that should be driven. Additionally, @Sump22 and @Caymanorcarrera made sarcastic remarks about the lack of upgrades, such as the absence of an aluminum fuel cap, and the design choices that may not appeal to everyone. The tone among these comments indicates a belief that while the car is impressive, certain choices could detract from its overall desirability.
|
32k-Mile 2005 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LT Extended Cab Z71 Regency 4×4
1GCEK19B55E281992
Lot 219561
Dealer
 |
Positive: The vehicle is noted for its impressive features and specifications, such as the Z71 Off-Road Package that includes power heated mirrors, keyless entry, and a leather-wrapped steering wheel. @genevamotorcars (The Seller) provided a road test video, which likely showcases the vehicle's performance, adding to its appeal. Additionally, the Silverado's robust Vortec 5.3L engine and high towing capacity make it a practical choice for users needing a reliable truck.
Neutral: The delivery details of the vehicle, including the odometer reading of 121 at the time of delivery and the build date of 04/08/2005, provide a basic understanding of its history. Furthermore, @KMBcars requested additional pictures of the passenger side, indicating an interest in examining the vehicle's condition thoroughly. Overall, this response reflects an ongoing engagement between the seller and potential buyers, showing that interested parties are keen on getting the full picture of the vehicle's state.
Negative: Some comments highlight a lack of clarity regarding detailed vehicle specifications. For instance, the mention of various option codes hints at a complex configuration that may not be readily understandable to all potential buyers. Additionally, concerns about the vehicle's service contracts and absence of warranties could deter some buyers who seek assurances when making significant investments. Possible reservations surrounding the vehicle's history, even though it has no branded title, could also contribute to a cautious approach from prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Tonyb98m3 appreciates the car, noting its appealing features and condition. @Triumph27 shares satisfaction with their own 20th Anniversary Golf R, highlighting its performance, handling, and versatility, which they describe as a 'Swiss Army knife.' They mention enjoying the drive modes and find the complaints about the infotainment system to be overblown once they got used to it. The seller, @changedriven, describes the vehicle as a 'gorgeous MK8 Golf R finished in Lapiz Blue' that presents like new, with features that enhance its usability, such as easily accessible drive modes.
Neutral: @C_Mass inquires about the original shift knob, and @Triumph27 asks about MSRP and vehicle options. The seller explains that the auction was started unexpectedly and provides context for the sale, revealing the car's warranty which is transferable and urging potential buyers to reach out for more information. @BreakingBid notes that the model lacks adaptive cornering lights compared to later versions, while @M.Klapp mentions that this can be updated with a simple software program, indicating the potential for personalization or upgrades.
Negative: @bbrs questions why the car is for sale again after only two years and two owners, casting doubt on its appeal. They express curiosity about the vehicle's history, while potential buyers like @Bentonsboss want to confirm the seller has the title, indicating a common concern over ownership uncertainties. Although the seller's responses maintain a positive tone, these inquiries highlight concerns about vehicle reliability and selling motivations.
|
 |
Positive: @TheMarkMotors (The Seller) emphasizes the incredible condition of the BMW M2 CS, highlighting its fantastic shape and the care it has received, including being entirely covered in paint protection film (PPF). Commenters such as @GravelTrap36 and @mkekiddoc agree with the sentiment that the design of the M2 CS is superior to newer models, with @mkekiddoc specifically mentioning it as the peak M2 to own. Others share their admiration for the car's stunning appearance, with @carsbikeswhatever recalling a beautiful moment when he saw a similar car on his drive.
Neutral: Some commenters express curiosity about the vehicle's history and request more information. @charleetuner is interested in the reliability of similar cars with higher mileage, while @amcnew asks for specific details regarding the car's undercarriage, driving capabilities, and whether it has ever been on a track. @surethingpartner inquires about potential scuffs on the front splitter, suggesting a thorough examination be shared with bidders. @TheMarkMotors (The Seller) addresses these inquiries, expressing confidence in the car's condition and reliability and confirming that no signs of tracking have been noted.
Negative: Despite the positive outlook, there are concerns that potential buyers share regarding the car's detailed inspection. @amcnew recounts a previous negative experience with a similar model that had rust issues upon arrival, leading them to request videos of the underbody and suspension. This indicates a caution on the part of some potential buyers when it comes to maintaining high expectations based on the seller's claims. Additionally, there is uncertainty around the condition of the front splitter, which could deter some buyers if not addressed adequately.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed strong enthusiasm for the 2006 Pontiac GTO, emphasizing its unique design and performance. @humbl3r noted that this model is one of the rarest built from the factory, highlighting its appealing combination of features and rarity, with comments from @72soft-top affirming the GTO's status as an underrated vehicle. @TurboHorizon also praised its alluring color combination, while @rabbitholepunch and @Goss47305 encouraged potential buyers to drive the car, suggesting its maintenance has kept it in excellent condition for driving purposes.
Neutral: Several comments revolved around the vehicle's specifications and options, with @tesoffice inquiring about the original wheels, and @Jdr2006GTO (The Seller) confirming that the car retains its original 17-inch wheels. Discussion about whether to use or preserve the car for investment was prevalent, with @BUDXR7 offering insights on evaluating its value. Others, like @sooner83, appreciated the ultra-low mileage and expressed personal connection to the vehicle, referencing plans to enjoy it responsibly without heavy use.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns about specific mechanical issues. @3xinvestor raised a potential problem of the front tires rubbing against the suspension struts, a common complaint for this model, while @Habu2 questioned whether this problem extended to the 2005-2006 models. Others criticized the presence of front license plate holes, with @rlromero expressing dislike for their aesthetic impact. Such concerns indicate an underlying apprehension about long-term reliability despite the car's current condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed strong admiration for the vehicle, noting its impressive design and build quality. @CarsBicyclesAndSushi highlighted the Turbo Cup mirrors, calling it a "proper 951 build" and wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @Fatalvenom also praised the car, stating it is a beautiful 944 and well-done for both track and street use. Similarly, @Caymanorcarrera described the car as a cool dual-purpose vintage sports car that would attract attention at the paddock, suggesting it's both fun to drive and practical.
Neutral: The comments included several inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and features. @AirBoss was interested in the car's track history and the estimated seat adjustability, while @EnhancedAspiration raised questions about the paint finish, passenger seat seatbelt, and vehicle modifications like the Turbo S turbo. @RevOn_Auto (The Seller) addressed many of these questions, providing detailed information about the car's specs, performance, and the work done to maintain its condition.
Negative: However, there were mentions of some concerns regarding the car's history, specifically referencing an entry about fire damage on its Carfax. @RevOn_Auto (The Seller) clarified that the owner found no signs of past damage when he purchased it, attributing it to an odd reporting situation rather than actual damage. Additionally, questions arose about the seatbelt absence for the passenger side and the potential "knick" under the driver's door, which may indicate areas needing further inspection.
|
 |
Positive: @Jhurlow expresses great enthusiasm for the Panoz, noting it as a 'diamonds in the rough' and praising its driving experience, ease of maintenance due to its Ford engine, and overall thrill. @Serviceguru, a previous owner, shares similar sentiments about the unique driving experience it offers, highlighting the attention it draws at events. The seller, @PanozAIV98, describes the car as rare and historically significant, emphasizing its hand-built nature and unique factory color, which further adds to the allure for automotive enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Civilguy appreciates the car's color but raises concerns about its cosmetic condition, specifically the scrapes and scratches. @Canbeam is intrigued by the mileage situation, noting the inconsistency in the odometer reading and questioning the condition despite limited driving. The seller clarifies the situation regarding the odometer and previous usage, attempting to address potential buyers' inquiries honestly. Comments also mention the features of the vehicle, such as the Roush-built V8 engine and its specifications without delving deeply into personal opinions.
Negative: @Civilguy and @jointprojects raise issues surrounding the odometer and other cosmetic concerns, suggesting the need for repairs which might deter potential buyers. @sjmorgan critiques the validity of the engine sourcing, suggesting it may not be a Roush engine and bringing into question the car's mechanical reputation. @shyduke points out the difficulty in sourcing a canvas top for the vehicle, indicating a potential inconvenience for future owners, while @PaymanPahlavan expresses doubts about matching the unique paint color due to its complexity.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the impressive spaciousness of the BMW GT, especially praising the rear seat area and cargo capacity. @Mrhoppy (The Seller) expresses his affection for the vehicle, referencing the substantial room available for transporting items like bikes. The exceptional service history and maintenance at a reputed dealership, combined with low mileage of only 25,000, also contribute to the positive remarks, suggesting the car is well-cared for and almost like new. Multiple commenters, such as @RovrLovr and @ActionJackson007, echo these sentiments, indicating the GT's reputation for comfort and performance.
Neutral: Several comments contain inquiries and discussions about specifics related to the BMW's condition and features. @AKPacu asks for the CarFax report, while @jprincipi raises a question about the vehicle being financed and the implications for the buyer. @hitchb inquires about the heads-up display, indicating interest in particular features, but without specific negative or positive commentations. These questions suggest a level of curiosity among potential buyers, showcasing the relevant details being discussed, but not necessarily forming a conclusion about the vehicle's overall desirability.
Negative: Although the overall sentiment is positive, there are a few mentions that could indicate some concern. @ActionJackson007 asks about a fault in the head unit, suggesting potential issues related to technology in the vehicle. @Mrhoppy (The Seller) clarifies that any faults were 'phantom' and linked to the battery replacement by CarMax rather than a genuine defect. This brings a slight air of caution about the car's electrical systems, albeit followed by reassurances from the seller. The mention of not going to BMW for the battery replacement also reflects a concern that the vehicle's maintenance could have been handled differently.
|
 |
Positive: @AndrewB3596 praises the Tundra, suggesting it’s a reliable vehicle. @BidRunner (The Seller) confirms the undercarriage's excellent condition, stating it spent its life in Florida, implying minimal exposure to harsh winters. @1globalleader describes it as a beautiful truck, which contributes to the positive sentiment about its appearance and maintenance.
Neutral: Comments feature several inquiries regarding the truck's maintenance and condition. @wolfekerr asks if there are any unusual smells in the cab, while @1globalleader inquires about the timing belt replacement and the condition of the brakes and fluids. @ryanod expresses interest in receiving updates and responses regarding fluid leaks and the timeline for video uploads.
Negative: Some concerns are raised regarding the truck's maintenance history, particularly by @1globalleader and @ryanod, who question whether the timing belt and possible fluid leaks could pose issues, especially given the vehicle's 174k miles. @ryanod also expresses disappointment over the delay in videos that were expected to be uploaded. This indicates a general level of caution amongst potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The Range Rover LWB, as described by @alexwhitela, is in excellent condition both inside and out, offering a smooth, quiet, and luxurious ride that reflects its top-of-the-line trim. The seller emphasizes the vehicle's well-maintained status, highlighting that it recently passed Land Rover's inspection with only minor issues noted, ensuring no compromise on ride quality. The added options, such as the Meridian Surround Sound system and various driver assistance features, enhance the luxury experience, making it a well-equipped vehicle with a high MSRP, and the seller expresses confidence that the next owner will enjoy and appreciate it.
Neutral: Several comments from potential buyers, including @CKart and @QueenElizabeth3, indicate interest in the vehicle's specifications and history. The seller promptly addressed these inquiries, clarifying the model's true specifications and ownership background. @CiChen requested an interior video showcasing the electronics, indicating a desire for transparency regarding how all features function. @splache44 also sought more images regarding specific indentations on the doors, which @alexwhitela provided, showing the seller's commitment to clear communication and transparency regarding the vehicle's condition as the auction progresses.
Negative: Despite the high praise, some concerns were raised regarding the previous ownership history, notably by @QueenElizabeth3, who questioned why there were several short-term owners. There was apprehension about the authenticity of some features, including the Autobiography badge on the tailgate, leading to skepticism about the vehicle's modifications. Additionally, the seller noted minor wear on components such as the lower control arm ball joints and some dings on the doors, which could be points of concern for potential buyers looking for a flawless vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: The 2016 Porsche Cayenne GTS is represented with enthusiasm by @2FAM, who emphasizes its appealing features and high standards of care. With a detailed description, @2FAM highlights its 'Premium Package Plus', plush interior, and recent maintenance work, which involved replacing the timing cover gaskets and battery. The family-owned business boasts extensive experience and a well-equipped facility, assuring potential buyers of their competence and dedication to quality. Furthermore, @2FAM's engagement with the community, like addressing inquiries about the window sticker and other concerns, adds a personal touch to the listing.
Neutral: Several community members, including @Romand076 and @Dmk13160, ask for additional information, indicating they are interested but need more details before making a decision. @M3rryChristmas appreciates @2FAM's proactive approach to engaging previous bidders on other Cayenne GTS models. While there is curiosity about the vehicle's condition regarding the original transfer case and any potential imperfections, the responses from @2FAM reassure potential bidders about the car's overall excellent condition and functionality.
Negative: A few comments raise concerns about the vehicle's history and condition. @Lamina inquires about the transfer case's status, suggesting skepticism regarding potential wear or issues, while @Dmk13160 asks directly about cosmetic blemishes and functionality. @mussocars's question about the 'quick flip' implies skepticism about the seller's intentions, though @Calli74 clarifies this is not the case, and it’s a continuation of their previous auction. These concerns hint at a level of caution among potential buyers, reflecting the need for transparency in the vehicle's representation.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments reflect enthusiasm for the 1991 GMC Syclone, highlighting its impressive performance and unique features. @choicedealsnc2017 and @PoolMaster both express admiration for the truck's aesthetic, with @PoolMaster recalling a notable comparison against a Ferrari in a Car and Driver magazine. @Jasonlewis52 describes the truck as beautiful with improvements that enhance its overall appeal, while others like @sy1616 and @Goldhatch94 share their enjoyment of owning similar models, suggesting a sense of camaraderie among Syclone enthusiasts.
Neutral: There are inquiries and suggestions about the truck's specifications and features, showcasing a blend of curiosity and advice. @Redsy2000 and @V8GEMITE ask specific questions regarding the vehicle's dimensions and compatibility with brakes, while @BrianBIN seeks clarification on functionality like the A/C and ABS systems. @1600veloce, the seller, provides detailed responses to these questions, reinforcing the transparent communication expected in such transactions and highlighting their experience and passion for cars.
Negative: Some comments convey a sense of regret or dissatisfaction, primarily regarding specific features of the vehicle. @stugottz recounts a challenge that resulted in a humbling defeat by a Syclone, while @sy1616 expresses disappointment noting the rear tire width could be larger for a more menacing appearance. Although these sentiments are not overly critical, they indicate that expectations for customization and specifications can vary among enthusiasts, suggesting that personal preferences play a significant role in perceptions of the truck.
|
 |
Positive: @4WHEEL_GERMAN highlighted that the vehicle will be smogged prior to delivery for California buyers and confirmed that there are no warning or error lights on the dashboard, suggesting a well-maintained vehicle. Additionally, the seller shared videos of the vehicle, providing interested buyers with visual insights and reassurance of the car's condition.
Neutral: There were inquiries from potential buyers like @frank1951 about the current smog certificate and the due date for tags, as well as concerns regarding the vehicle's mileage. @acl92262 expressed interest in the air conditioning's performance, asking if it runs cold and if there are any other issues to be aware of.
Negative: @frank1951 mentioned worries about the vehicle's mileage, stating that after 100,000 miles, issues typically begin to arise, reflecting a common concern about the reliability of older vehicles. Overall, although there were strong reassurances from the seller, some potential buyers seemed apprehensive about potential long-term problems associated with high mileage.
|
350-Powered 1987 Chevrolet V10 Scottsdale Fleetside 4×4 Pickup
1GCEV14K7HF334320
Lot 219604
Private Party
 |
Positive: @jloker commented on how slick the truck looks, expressing admiration and wishing the seller good luck with the sale. Many others, including @cast86 and @Wentlandt, noted the overall aesthetic appeal of the truck, with @Wentlandt particularly appreciating its vintage vibe and unique features. @waltco (The Seller) has actively engaged with inquiries, providing details about the truck that showcase its positive attributes.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Noahyjohn and @Bowtie59, asked specific questions regarding the truck's specifications and condition, such as the bed length and the status of particular parts like the cab corners and floor pans. @Fastaerocoupe clarified the naming conventions related to the model year, indicating a shared understanding of the truck's history among enthusiasts. @65resto mentioned an aftermarket air conditioning setup, suggesting options for future owners without expressing a personal opinion.
Negative: @Beans_Bacon pointed out the lack of air conditioning, suggesting that without this feature, the truck may not meet everyone's comfort needs. Additionally, @rlhug1954 and @Johnboy5 engaged in a discussion about the model designation, which could imply some confusion or concern among potential buyers regarding the truck's authenticity or categorization. This indicates that while the vehicle has many fans, there are also critical viewpoints that could affect its appeal.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received overwhelming praise for its stunning aesthetics, with commentors such as @74Det describing it as "simply stunning," while @Sledhead36 expressed their astonishment with emojis. @Dtheriault appreciates the tasteful modifications, suggesting they could enhance its market value, and @PanteraMike74 commended its comprehensive GT5-S conversion, labeling it a "beautiful example." Commentors are enthusiastic about the fine details and overall execution of the build, with @Bmarcum stating it beautifully blends modified Italian aesthetics and American power. @Speedracer1952 (The Seller) highlighted the car's flawless paint and a solid ride quality, accompanied by a promising performance departing from feedback of other owners who wished to see it driven.
Neutral: Several participants noted technical aspects of the car and sought clarifications about its modifications. @norCalSurfer brought up the dash design differences across years while others asked about specific features like the undercarriage condition and whether the engine is original or has been replaced. @michaelp1usa inquired about the rear passenger side quarter panel repair and paint details, while @Car-fan pondered the paint's matching quality post-repair. Commentors like @MacsMovieCars expressed the need for more detailed documentation on engine modifications and underbody condition. Overall, there is a sense of curiosity regarding the additional technical specifications of the car, underscoring an interest in its restoration and customization history.
Negative: Conversely, not all comments were purely positive, with some expressing concerns about reliability and transparency. @mresso pointed out a lack of videos showcasing the car running, which made them cautious about its reliability. @1889 criticized @Speedracer1952 (The Seller) for suggesting the car should be shipped rather than driven, highlighting the joy of driving such a collector's piece. Furthermore, some commentors raised issues about potential discrepancies concerning previously noted damages, with @michaelp1usa and @Car-fan voicing apprehensions regarding the quarter panel's repair and whether it was satisfactory. In general, these comments reflect a mixed sentiment where excitement and skepticism coexist regarding the vehicle's condition and restoration efforts.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its sleek appearance, especially in black. @geeitup praised the car's look despite not being a fan of black cars, reinforcing the idea that it has a strong aesthetic appeal. The seller, @greenerdays11, engaged with the community by asking how they could assist potential buyers, indicating a willingness to facilitate a positive buying experience.
Neutral: Some community members requested additional information about the vehicle, such as the availability of service records and the possibility of a driving video. @jamest89 inquired about service records, to which @greenerdays11 responded that he would follow up on that request. Another user, @LABAutomotive, showed interest in a driving video, indicating a desire for more transparency about the vehicle's performance.
Negative: There were no outright negative comments about the vehicle itself; however, a few users expressed concerns or shared preferences regarding specific features. @geeitup made a comment about the potential buyer blacking out the windows, suggesting a possible concern about the aesthetics if modifications were made. Additionally, @jefFJ80 asked about adding paddle shifters, implying a desire for enhanced functionality, which may indicate that some users wish for additional features that are not present.
|
46-Mile 2022 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Convertible C8.R Championship Edition Z51 3LT
1G1YC3D43N5108785
Lot 219605
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters highlighted the beauty and performance aspects of the 2022 Corvette Stingray Convertible. @JayKaySmith spoke about the thrill of driving such cars, mentioning how they enjoy their newly purchased Z06/Z07 and how much fun it is. @csptrn echoed a similar sentiment, sharing their love for their own Corvette and how it garners attention, appreciating the unique yellow accents that enhance its visual appeal. The remarks show a strong admiration for the car, with multiple individuals expressing excitement for its capabilities and design.
Neutral: Some users raised questions about specific features and the condition of the vehicle. @HoldenMcGroin requested clarification on the availability of magnetic ride control and front nose lift, while @59soldus23 inquired about paint protection film and ceramic coating. @Yags asked about the maintenance and fuel history of the vehicle, indicating curiosity about the car's care despite its low mileage. These types of inquiries reflect an interest in understanding the vehicle's overall value and performance potential based on its specifications and how it has been maintained.
Negative: A few comments conveyed skepticism regarding the vehicle's low mileage and why someone would let a luxury car sit for an extended period. @Noisyboyz expressed confusion about why anyone would spend such a large sum on a performance car only to allow it to sit idle, hinting at a lack of transparency surrounding the story of the car. @4Kmotoring also questioned if there was an issue with the vehicle, urging for an explanation on the limited mileage. Additionally, @Yungun criticized the choice of engine for the edition, questioning why Chevy didn't use the flat-plane crank V8, reflecting dissatisfaction with its engine specifications.
|
 |
Positive: @sws615 praises the almond beige interior of the vehicle, stating it looks much better with the white exterior compared to the earlier models with impractical seats. They find the car to be visually appealing. @mlowengrub shares a positive sentiment, noting the care taken in maintaining the vehicle, mentioning its impressive ownership history and features like the rear cargo cover. @hobbsm3 fondly reminisces about their father-in-law's ownership of the wagon, highlighting its mechanical and cosmetic upkeep, and expresses happiness that the vehicle is still on the road.
Neutral: @roadsterlife expresses curiosity about why the vehicle is being sold just a year after purchase, while @Sacksenheim seeks clarification on the car's service location and its availability for inspection, indicating a potential interest in the purchase. @starkMN16 asks for additional images of the vehicle's front and rear bumpers, and engine bay, interested in any signs of wear but acknowledging the overall good condition. @67GOAT follows up on previous comments regarding the bottom bumper clips, showing a cautious interest in the vehicle's condition.
Negative: No negative comments were found regarding the vehicle's condition or history. However, some comments showed concerns or requests for additional information, such as potential scratches or repair confirmations. Overall, the sentiment remained positive with no significant criticisms raised.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle, noting its elegance and beauty. @lincolnsandcaddies described the car as 'pure elegance and class,' emphasizing the Cadillac's distinctive appeal. @Dollycat3 highlighted the stunning pink cloth and leather interior and the gorgeous Wood Rose Metallic paint, exclaiming it radiates '50’s fabulousness.' @Hoppy18 remarked on its status as a beautiful piece of Americana, suggesting the model name should have been 'Roi DeVille', thus further enhancing its prestige.
Neutral: The discussion also delved into the specifics of the car's condition and features. @Classic7752, representing the Seller, reassured viewers that the vehicle is in great shape with no noticeable leaks or drips after being displayed in the museum. Furthermore, the seller encouraged potential buyers to ask questions about the car's details, indicating a willingness to provide further information or photographs as necessary. Multiple commenters, such as @Ron58ford and @bobsinhawaii, requested additional pictures and verification of certain features, like the trunk and VIN number, indicating a thorough interest in the vehicle's authenticity and details.
Negative: However, some comments raised concerns about aspects of the car. @BigRed pointed out that the vehicle never had AC, challenging the buyer's expectations. @cruzahome noted the presence of extensive pitting on the chrome trim, hinting at possible neglect or wear. @ericdev criticized the paint color, asserting it deviates from the original Wood Rose and likening it more closely to a poorly mixed Persian Sand color, raising doubts about the car's restoration quality. Such comments reflect apprehension among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's condition and authenticity.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters like @EXS and @ram_g celebrate the vehicle's history and maintenance, noting how the car has been well-loved with a reasonable driving history of 8k miles annually. They see this listing as a perfect opportunity for someone seeking a starter R129, emphasizing the quality of the Benz and its longevity. @nmoreno0306 highlights that the interior appears surprisingly well-preserved for a car with 200,000 miles, showcasing impressive condition which contributes positively to the vehicle's overall appeal.
Neutral: @EastBayDave (The Seller) mentions various recent maintenance efforts, including significant replacements like the alternator, radiator, and battery, which portray an active investment in the car's upkeep. He discusses parts value for potential buyers, providing a breakdown of costs for specific components that might interest those considering dismantling the car. Alongside questions from @JT05 and @mike1484 concerning the vehicle's condition and documentation, the atmosphere shifts towards a focus on practicality and parts.
Negative: On the other hand, some commenters are skeptical about the car's future value and condition. @SWEQS argues against the likelihood of fetching over $10k due to concerns about paint imperfections and wear, while @Shantsgarage suggests it is more likely to become a daily driver or a parts car rather than a collector's item. Additionally, @Spokayman feels that the conversation about parting out the vehicle is misguided, expressing doubts about the car's perceived value versus its potential to serve as an efficient commuter until its functionality diminishes.
|
 |
Positive: The 2004 BMW 325i Sport Touring Wagon is being presented as a solid vehicle, praised for its beautiful condition and smooth driving experience. @SAImports (The Seller) mentions that it runs and drives exactly as it should, highlighting that there are no known mechanical issues. Additionally, @TheOMDude shares fond memories of a similar model, suggesting that this version possesses great qualities for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments express interest in the vehicle's maintenance history and specific details about various components. @Twinheckle raises questions about the oil and transmission pan, while @Willwill asks for maintenance records beyond the water pump. @BavarianEvolution and @PhilInAthens also inquire about repairs and pictures of the car's underside and interior. @SAImports (The Seller) responds, stating all service history is recorded on the Carfax and clarifying the current condition of components like the headliner and control arm bushings.
Negative: Some comments hint at necessary repairs and concerns about the vehicle's condition. @Jonfrancis notes that the driver's seat needs replacing and that the passenger seat could benefit from cleaning. @ssk2023 questions any known issues regarding the car's operation, while @skarthur asks about potential sagging in the headliner and whether the vehicle is missing items like a hood insulation pad. @SAImports (The Seller) addresses these inquiries but acknowledges the need for some cosmetic updates.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 remarked that the vehicle is 'absolutely beautiful' and praised an inspiring video of Bill, the seller, showcasing his love for the car. @UncleFred1 and @AntoineS both expressed their appreciation for the vehicle, with @UncleFred1 noting its honest look and @AntoineS identifying the color combination as a rare and appealing choice. The enthusiasm around the car is palpable, as various commenters show excitement about its history and potential for a new owner.
Neutral: @happyxhour requested more information about the vehicle, including undercarriage pictures and videos of cold starts and driving. They also inquired about the door closures and any documentation relating to the car's history, indicating a desire for transparency before making a decision. The seller, @DCMotorco, responded positively, promising to provide additional information and suggesting a personal inspection for a better understanding of the car.
Negative: @sade pointed out that the vehicle 'needs some money to invest,' implying it requires some restoration or improvement. @TheChamberlain mentioned that the car needs to be brought up to their liking, indicating that it may not meet all potential buyers' standards without additional work. @staramerica raised a question about a missing rearview mirror, hinting at concerns regarding the car's completeness or condition.
|
 |
Positive: @CarManChris has received positive feedback regarding the car's condition and repair history. Commenters like @slugg and @GaryRoach appreciate its appearance and the appealing color combination, noting the absence of excessive modifications. @CarManChris emphasizes the quality of repairs done to the vehicle, confirming that the minor damage was just cosmetic and handled professionally, preserving the car's overall integrity and driving experience.
Neutral: The seller, @CarManChris, provides detailed responses to inquiries about the vehicle's history, damage reports, and the condition of the garage where the vehicle has been stored. These disclosures aim to assure potential buyers about the car's maintenance and how well it has been kept during its life. Questions from commenters, including @mfm26 and @ScotwithoneT, focus on the potential for water damage from past hurricane seasons as well as the car's readiness for travel, which @CarManChris addresses directly.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the car's past incidents, such as the rear-end collision reported by @slugg. @CarManChris clarifies that the car was never rear-ended but experienced minor dents and scratches due to a parking incident, which some may find indicative of potential underlying issues. Despite these clarifications, doubts about the car’s history may linger for some potential buyers, reflected in @slugg's probing questions regarding VIN stickers and repair documentation.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed strong affection for this vehicle, praising its reliability and longevity. @Jrosero59 humorously noted the car's toughness, suggesting that it could survive anything, while @newcarpro highlighted its potential for a long lifespan. The car received appreciation for its affordability on BAT, as mentioned by @tscoll01, and @Supra60 recalled having the same model, stating it served him well over 175,000 miles with minimal maintenance. @HeavyTank77 echoed these sentiments, describing his experience with a newer Camry and expressing confidence in this car's performance and reliability, asserting that the older models are exceptional as daily drivers.
Neutral: The seller, @CMD1, engaged with various commenters, providing clarifications about the vehicle's condition and answering queries regarding maintenance. He mentioned that the car has a timing chain instead of a belt, eliminating the need for belt service, and claimed there are no leaks and that the brakes are in excellent condition. Additionally, @CMD1 addressed concerns about some rust described by @NortEdward and others, asserting that the advised corrosion was just surface rust, with no structural issues. He also commented on the vibrancy of the vehicle's ride compared to newer models, stating that the experience is much smoother with this generation of Camry.
Negative: Despite overall positive feedback, some commenters raised concerns and reservations about the vehicle. @mrpotty inquired about the timing belt and possible leaks, expressing a cautious approach due to the car's city mileage history. @sinetyv questioned the color match of the doors compared to the rest of the vehicle, implying a potential cosmetic issue. Additionally, @CamBam brought up concerns regarding corrosion on suspension components and requested clarification on whether it was mere surface rust or indicative of more significant structural problems. Discussions about sagging in the headliner by @skk1961 further reflected some apprehensions about the vehicle’s interior condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally express a positive sentiment towards the vehicle. @cosmicfunkjuice notes that it's a "really clean 86" and believes the owner will be happy with the car, indicating a strong appreciation for its condition. @ecleek provides assurance that the FR-S has been well-maintained and offers the best of care, enhancing its value as a long-term vehicle for any buyer. Additionally, @AriGold23 shows interest in the car's features and maintenance, highlighting the seller's transparency about its condition and service history, further contributing to the positive perception.
Neutral: Several comments address specific features and logistics regarding the vehicle. For instance, @AriGold23 inquires about the smog certification for California buyers and anything done since the last service reported in 2023, indicating attention to legality and maintenance status. @Alfanut2600 reminisces about their experience with a similar model and provides useful information about how to fold the rear seats, showcasing the curiosity and shared knowledge of FR-S owners. These interactions reflect a practical perspective on the vehicle without strong emotional bias.
Negative: There are few negative comments, but some inquiries hint at concerns. @AriGold23 raises potential worries about the car's service history, asking about any issues or leaks, which could imply a cautious attitude towards buying used vehicles. Although @AriGold23 voices a desire for a manual transmission and expresses a personal wish regarding the vehicle's specifications, this reflects more of a subjective preference rather than a direct criticism of the vehicle itself. Overall, while no overtly negative comments are made, there are hints of concern regarding maintenance and features that potential buyers may wish to verify.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the 1960 Thunderbird, emphasizing its stunning looks and exceptional provenance. @Dollycat3 describes it as a 'stunning Thunderbird with a wonderful provenance,' while @Noisyboyz highlights its status as the last and best edition of the 'square birds,' praising its striking Monte Carlo Red color and desirable 430 Lincoln engine option. Additionally, @63impalaboy notes that this Thunderbird is a standout example of personal luxury, built alongside Lincolns, which contributes to its high quality and desirability in the automotive market. Comments such as @jturner calling the car 'cool' reflect a general consensus of appreciation among enthusiasts and collectors.
Neutral: Some comments delve into more technical aspects of the Thunderbird, such as its engine configuration and transmission capabilities. @pbf777 clarifies distinctions between the 430 Lincoln and 352 engines, discussing their placement and compatibility with the Cruise-O-Matic transmission. @redsox8 raises questions about the convertible top and mileage history, receiving informative responses from @HyannisHonda (The Seller). This exchange highlights necessary details for potential buyers, indicating a general interest but also uncertainty regarding specific condition aspects and historical documentation. Others like @gocorcoran and @mauiade contribute whimsical suggestions or facts related to the car's lineage, showcasing community engagement without strong emotional ties to the vehicle.
Negative: A few comments voice tentative concerns or critical questions about the Thunderbird. @redsox8, for instance, brings up the condition of the convertible top, questioning whether it has small cuts that could lead to leaks. The seller, @HyannisHonda, acknowledges the unknown mileage and the presence of a mark on the roof, suggesting a lack of certain documentation to verify the car's history. Also, @Okjab expresses skepticism regarding the transmission compatibility mentioned by others. Overall, while positive sentiments dominate the discussion, there is a layer of caution among some commentators, reflecting the importance of thorough assessment for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the bike as a beautiful example of the R100S, with specific commendations for its well-maintained condition and appealing paint scheme. @fiminod received well-wishes regarding the auction, while @wizzleteats expressed a strong desire to own it, highlighting the right upgrades. @berfinroy noted the stunning red smoke metallic paint, even acknowledging that if it’s been repainted, it was done exceptionally well. @Motogrotto appreciated the bike's aesthetics, complimenting the repaint and its resilience compared to the original paint flaws. @DaveD shared a nostalgic account of his similarly valuable bike, emphasizing the enduring joy these machines provide.
Neutral: Several users inquired about specifics regarding the bike's components, including the originality of the paint and seat, as well as the presence of items like panniers and the factory tool kit. @originalbob and @Sumran asked if the seat was a reproduction and mentioned the absence of bags and racks, speculating on their possible disappearance. @Mike_from_Los_Angeles questioned the authenticity of the snowflake wheels, while @Alfalfanut sought clarity about the tool kit's authenticity, both showing keen interest in the bike's history while maintaining neutrality.
Negative: On the other hand, some comments raised concerns about the bike's recent service costs, with @Alfalfanut and @bobofohio questioning the necessity and propriety of the expenses incurred. @exbikeracer humorously dismissed the bike's appeal, suggesting nobody should bid except for himself, indicating a playful yet negative tone. There were also doubts expressed about the bike's condition, with @fast560 questioning a light mark on the seat. Overall, while the bike received much admiration, these comments reflect a mix of skepticism regarding its recent repairs and overall value, especially among those looking for a potential purchase.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors have expressed enthusiasm for the 2025 Lotus Emira, highlighting its stunning design and quality modifications. @Sonderwunsche remarked on the car's sport suspension and Pilot Sport Cup 2 tires, calling it "delicious". @SingleClutch praised its interior and noted that the vehicle is moving in the right direction amidst automotive industry trends. @L0tusExigeS confirmed the car's impressive performance both on roads and tracks, emphasizing its status as a featured build by Obsessed Garage. @kvb968 emphasized that the car has significant aftermarket modifications worth over $20k, indicating it stands out as one of the finest Emira vehicles available.
Neutral: Several comments included questions and confirmations regarding the car's specifications and features. @Cantech (The Seller) provided answers to inquiries about tire and brake measurements, confirming that the front tires are at 6+/32nds and the rears at around 4/32nds. @John4C asked pertinent questions about the vehicle's fobs and their respective functions, alongside asking about paint protection film (PPF) specifics. The seller also clarified the purpose of the two fobs and shared links to additional products associated with the car, allowing potential buyers to gather more context about the features.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive remarks, there were concerns raised by some commenters. @Lucky253 found the categorization of a brake sensor warning as "intermittent" to be misleading, stating the warning goes off consistently after stopping the car. This was challenged but acknowledged by @Cantech (The Seller), who clarified that it was a parking distance sensor and offered solutions for its presentation condition. This issue raised questions about transparency in the listing for a new vehicle with low mileage, potentially affecting buyer perception.
|
|
|