Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express excitement and admiration for the Chieftain tank being auctioned, highlighting its impressive presence and functionality. @Wob, the seller, notes the benefits of owning such a vehicle, emphasizing its military credibility and availability of parts. @Alaskastang and others particularly appreciate the Haynes manual included with the sale, calling it a rare and valuable inclusion that adds to the novelty of the auction. Commenters also enjoy the entertaining and humorous aspects of discussing a tank as a vehicle option, with jokes about its size and capabilities, making for an engaging comment section.
Neutral: Several commenters have questions regarding specific features and logistics related to the vehicle, such as whether it includes dynamic cruise control, heated or ventilated seats, and the details surrounding its shipping logistics. @Spotpea and @VanCronk inquire about these features, while others like @Eagle32 check on maintenance aspects and historical details of the tank. Some also reflect on the practicality of owning a tank for daily use, with remarks on its legal implications and potential for neighborhood disputes, mixing curiosity with humor.
Negative: While many appreciate the tank's uniqueness, some users express skepticism about its practicality and relevance to everyday life. @joepags notably comments on the absence of a third pedal, stating they are out of the bidding due to that factor. Others bring up concerns about comfort and safety, with @ohiolion and @richus19 questioning the vehicle's interior design. There are also light-hearted criticisms about the logistics of owning such a large vehicle, with comments from users who joke about HOA regulations and the absurdity of needing a tank for commuting.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the Ferrari 458 Speciale A, with @boaboyoz calling it absolutely stunning and describing its unique appeal in Rosso Corsa. @EGuyer1521 estimated that the selling price might exceed seven figures, and @Voodoorgv described it as their dream car. The overall excitement about the vehicle was palpable, with comments from @Wob highlighting its rarity and condition and emphasizing the experience it offers. These sentiments suggest that the Speciale A is seen as a highly desirable collector's item, underscored by @marksTX affirming its value in the market due to its exceptional driving experience.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the upcoming auction dynamics and logistics surrounding the sale process. @Wob, the seller, provided comprehensive guidelines about the auction framework, addressing common inquiries and inviting engagement from potential bidders. The comments also included practical advice for interested buyers, like the importance of scheduling inspections and bidding responsibly. The dialogue was marked by a genuine enthusiasm for the auction's progress, with @Wob underscoring their commitment to an enjoyable auction experience.
Negative: On the flip side, some comments expressed skepticism regarding the escalating prices of high-end vehicles like the 458 Speciale A. @2006m5 voiced doubts over the valuation compared to other luxury vehicles, suggesting a preference for brands like Bugatti. @Hargo questioned the practicality of the vehicle's specifications, specifically the fuel requirements. Lastly, @Wentlandt urged owners to enjoy the cars rather than treat them solely as investment assets, indicating a concern that these vehicles are being undervalued in terms of their intended purpose.
![]() |
SharkWerks-Modified 2008 Porsche 911 GT2 Styled by Magnus Walker
WP0AD29998S796088
Lot 220255
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, with @DieselM333 calling it a "truly special car" and suggesting that it would draw in high bids. @mcLeather appreciated the car's iconic association with the previous license plate "GOT JAWS," while @HedrickHSS remarked on its stunning appeal, suggesting it could be framed as art. Others, such as @Dennis.I, highlighted the car's balance between drivability and exhilarating power, noting it’s a fantastic 911 that offers immediate performance. Overall, the unique modifications and history of the car have garnered a lot of admiration among the Porsche community.
Neutral: Several comments reflected on the car's design and modifications, indicating a mix of opinions among enthusiasts. @mb36cg humorously pointed out the British influence in its aesthetics with the Union Jack, while @mara721 raised a query about the DME report, which suggests that some potential buyers are evaluating specific performance metrics. Seller @246dinoguy reassured viewers about the mileage documentation and the vehicle's consistent performance, affirming its robust engineering and quality modifications by SharkWerks, particularly in relation to its famous features and previous appearances.
Negative: Not all feedback was positive, as some commenters shared their concerns about the color scheme and modifications. @c615586 suggested a return to a more stock look, implying that current styling may deter some bidders. @RapidGT cautioned that altering the car's distinctive appearance could tarnish its provenance, while @rofandofy admitted uncertainty about the paint scheme. Meanwhile, @Ryandad highlighted his enjoyment of the driving experience but mentioned the precautions needed for handling such raw power, pointing out potential risks associated with its high-performance modifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors rave about the vehicle, with @Bluedevils3615 calling it a "museum piece" and @mpizzi348 noting the "pristine engine insulation" as impressive. @WAH expresses excitement with a simple "WOW!" and @Mychordistooshort shows interest in buying back the car, emphasizing its value. @Wob (The Seller) describes it as an "incredible time capsule" that looks, smells, and drives like new. He has confidence in its status as one of the best 348s in existence, particularly in the favored TB trim and stunning red/black color combination. The enthusiasm is palpable, and the seller also encourages potential bidders to reach out, create discussions, and make the auction experience enjoyable.
Neutral: There are several discussions regarding the features and specifics of the car, with @M-Couper asking about the removal of the original stereo and the re-leathering of the hinged cover. @Wob (The Seller) humorously responds by suggesting that the original radio was outdated. @Mychordistooshort provides insights into the differences between European and American models regarding design elements. Meanwhile, @ExJetTech points out that the redesigned ash tray box is reinforced to prevent future issues, which adds a layer of practical advice for potential buyers. These comments help clarify some features and maintenance aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: Some comments hint at concerns over originality and modifications, with @M-Couper questioning the necessity of changing the stereo system and the re-leathering of the cover. This raises potential concerns around the car's authenticity in its pristine condition. Additionally, @LaFerrari points out that the radio was not standard equipment, which could imply that alterations to the original setup may affect the vehicle's value. Such discussions underline the importance of authenticity in collector cars and suggest that any modifications could lead to mixed feelings among potential buyers.
![]() |
NASCAR Cup Series Pennzoil 400 VIP Experience for Drive Toward a Cure
Pennzoil 400 at Las Vegas Motor Speedway
Lot 220416
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Comments reflect a strong support for the auction and its associated charity work, with several participants expressing enthusiasm for the cause. @GenauAutoWerks described their experience with Drive Toward a Cure as "phenomenal" and commended the organization's worthy efforts. @PENNZOIL_Official also expressed excitement about the auction, highlighting the opportunity for the winner to enjoy an unforgettable NASCAR weekend while supporting a crucial mission. @Dogman07 emphasized the positive impact of the auction in attracting attention and funds for Parkinson’s disease, suggesting widespread appreciation for the initiative.
Neutral: Several comments contained inquiries or references without strong emotional weight. @PhilInAthens wondered whether a spin around the track was included in the auction package, showcasing curiosity about the specifics of the event. @Covey asked about the availability of 'hot passes,' indicating a desire for more details on what the VIP experience entails. Additionally, @DriveTowardaCure (The Seller) provided insights about the event, including potential activities for the auction winner, contributing to the informative aspect of the discussion.
Negative: A few comments revealed some skepticism or disappointment regarding aspects of the auction or related topics. @bac15 mentioned that their son despises Joey Logano, suggesting that not all potential participants may have a favorable view of the featured NASCAR personality. @sliproc expressed confusion, thinking the auction was for the racetrack itself, indicating a potential misunderstanding about the nature of the event. Overall, while mainly supportive, there were a few voices expressing doubt or concern.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle's stunning aesthetics and remarkable specifications. @Kishote enthusiastically remarks on the perfect use of color and design, emphasizing the car's stature as a standout in automotive excellence. @Robcam describes it as so perfect that it seems almost fake, highlighting the extreme admiration it commands among enthusiasts. Overall, the car is described as a work of art, with @Wob emphasizing the experience and euphoric sensations it delivers during drives.
Neutral: There are discussions surrounding the specifics of the vehicle's mileage and auction details. @Waltjr raises a question about the conflicting mileage reported on the Carfax report, which prompts @Wob (The Seller) to clarify that the correct mileage is indeed 500. Aspects of the auction process are also mentioned, with @Wob elucidating the importance of reaching out for inspections and the significance of understanding the bidding process, showing a commitment to transparent communication with interested bidders.
Negative: Some comments express concerns regarding the vehicle's reported mileage and the potential for inaccuracies in the documentation. @volvo268 notes a discrepancy on the Montana title, suggesting a challenging correction process. Additionally, @JettJolene shares hesitance about the car’s design choices, stating a preference for another model altogether, implying dissatisfaction with certain features of the 812 Competizione. Overall, while apprehensions exist, @Wob reassures potential buyers regarding documentation corrections.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors have expressed their admiration for the vehicle's build quality and aesthetics. @adbuch called it a 'super clean build', while @loggdon praised the color scheme, stance, and wheel/tire choice. @mike_rockwell described it as a 'clean simple hot-rod to have fun driving', and @Bauback complimented the 'unique and gorgeous' burgundy interior and engine color. Furthermore, @VictoriaADTrucks emphasized that the design follows the principle of 'less is more' which resonates with the hot rod culture, showcasing the vehicle’s appeal to enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding specific features and specifications of the vehicle. @ryanwix questioned the current status of the smooth hoodsides and the seat bottom suitability for taller drivers. @wop33 asked whether both seat options would be included and whether the brake pedal interfered with the steering column. Additionally, @spdjunior sought clarification on the vehicle's build origin, storage behind the seat, and various mechanical details like the presence of an E-brake and rear-end type.
Negative: There were concerns about potential drawbacks of the vehicle as some commenters pointed out things that may need addressing or clarifying. @Bmarcum questioned the passenger comfort in the rear, expressing doubt that an adult could fit, while @wei1936 raised concerns regarding a possible dent in the vehicle's rear, which the seller confirmed existed. @timmyd716 expressed dissatisfaction over the absence of an E-brake, indicating a possible safety concern that may deter potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters are expressing admiration for the vehicle, particularly noting its stunning appearance and quality. @AGARWAL2032 referred to the car as 'beautiful . . . just like a whale,' while @boaboyoz praised its combination of Arena Red Metallic and Cashmere Beige as 'a stunning beast.' Multiple users, including @HughCasiano, highlighted the car's exceptional condition, with @DougDeMuro expressing enthusiasm before clarifying he's not bidding. The consensus among fans is that this 993 Turbo is a top-notch example of its kind, with one user stating it’s 'fantastic' and 'absolutely gorgeous'.
Neutral: Some comments revolve around the seller's presentation and technical details of the car, contributing to a balanced perspective. @911r (The Seller) has responded to various questions regarding the vehicle's specifications and history, clarifying the presence of the factory option phone and discussing the upholstery's reupholstering. While some users noted the beauty and cleanliness of the car, others sought clarification on odometer readings and the condition of specific features. The dialogue suggests a respectful and informative engagement among the community regarding this vehicle, with users sharing insights about similar cars they own or have seen.
Negative: There are a few concerns mentioned regarding the vehicle's history and features. @Andrewpc1 raised a question about discrepancies in the odometer reading, and multiple comments suggest caution regarding potential rolled-back mileage, with @celan speculating about the occurrence of this with the car. Additionally, @RottonF1 expressed disappointment that certain interior color options did not match their personal preferences, suggesting the vehicle could be vastly improved if those were altered. Such discussions indicate a level of scrutiny and skepticism from users who are closely evaluating this high-profile auction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @PWSchuh described the vehicle as a perfect car for a buyer named Paul, while @Joey1320 highlighted that it definitely gets people's attention, suggesting it's fun to drive. @Gmmuscleusa emphasized that the modifications capture an essential moment in automotive history and should not be undone. @APPLESAUCED_226 remarked on the impressive performance history and pampered nature of the car, expressing that someone will be very lucky to own it. Additionally, @Kricko03 (The Seller) shared personal anecdotes about the car, emphasizing its significance to his father-in-law and how it has been carefully maintained.
Neutral: Several users have provided insights into the unique features of the car. @Cobra4B noted that the wheels appear to be HRE and shared some historical context about their connection to John Purner and the Viper community. @xsmph inquired about performance metrics such as dyno results, to which @Kricko03 (The Seller) later indicated some paperwork was found backing up the car's performance claims. Other comments mentioned the vehicle's design, such as @rabbitholepunch suggesting modifications to tone down the aesthetics, and @GtrGuy humorously considering its use as a snow plow due to its splitter design.
Negative: Some comments expressed concerns about the practicality and features of the car. @Hulk2000 questioned the aesthetics of the car's lead photo, while @switchcars suggested that the car seems overly sensitive to parking curbs. @Fredmiller and @twj010104 pointed out the non-functioning air conditioning and made light of its potential discomfort while driving at high speeds. Criticism also came from @SwissBliss, who expressed doubts about the car's advertised horsepower despite its impressive modifications, and others like @titanium_nipplez shared concerns about the risks posed by the aggressive splitter design.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many users have praised the motorcycle for its impressive design and features. @Boomer54 noted its comfort after proper adjustments, while @Attila.J described it as a very nice machine, emphasizing it can be issue-free for thousands of miles. The paint job received particular admiration, with @YankeeDixie calling it cool and well done, and @RoganJames appreciating the aesthetic appeal of the bike, including the graphics on the rear fender and the custom tank design. @kkloster, the seller, provided detailed responses that indicated pride in the motorcycle's appearance and experience during ownership, suggesting a well-maintained vehicle.
Neutral: Comments revealed a sense of curiosity about the motorcycle's features and past service. @RoganJames asked why it was being sold, to which @kkloster responded with personal reasons and acknowledged the decline in riding frequency. @Manskraft inquired about the motorcycle’s electric start and tire information, to which @kkloster provided specifics regarding the tire conditions and history. Overall, there was an attempt from users to gain more information about the bike, indicating engagement beyond mere admiration.
Negative: There were concerns raised regarding the cam chain tensioners, with @Boomer54 and @Attila.J discussing potential issues and repairs needed for models manufactured between 1999-2006. Although @kkloster claimed there had been no mention of necessary repairs during service, caution was implied by others in the conversation. Furthermore, @RoganJames expressed disappointment over the apparent decrease in interest in Harley-Davidson motorcycles among younger generations, suggesting that the iconic brand needs to revitalize its appeal or risk losing relevance. This viewpoint underscores a sentiment of concern about the bike's market and future.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly its options and aesthetic appeal. @stugottz noted it was an "Awesome Camaro!" with a special mention of the SS/RS option, while @e9er called it a great car with excellent features, specifically praising the LeMans color. @funkaholik highlighted the beauty of the car, referring to it as "beautifully optioned, big block RS," indicating a strong appreciation for its features and design.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the car's condition, with @classiccarswest clarifying details about its history and specifications, such as the non-original motor and transmission. @Lurvey inquired about the vehicle's body condition, prompting a response that no major rust repairs had been made, apart from surface rust in the trunk. Commenters like @Ibuild pointed out the vehicle's potential as a project car, suggesting minor fixes that could enhance its value and functionality, including adding AC.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding some issues with the vehicle's systems. @johnnyvett noted that the power locks and other functions like the rear windows and horn were not operational, while @classiccarswest confirmed the non-working components and acknowledged ongoing evaluation. @greatscott criticized the slow bidding process and indicated that relevant comments related to the auction were lacking, which might affect interest and sale potential.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its gorgeous appearance and striking color combination. @DOWNRANGEOPS called it a 'GORGEOUS CAR', while @JosephAuto pointed out its unique seating capacity for six full-sized adults, making it a potentially rare find. @MikFerg and @Ramenator echoed positivity with their compliments, highlighting the beauty of the car and its awesome color. Additionally, several users mentioned their nostalgia for the vehicle, associating it with the mid-'70s era and its luxurious features, which include the classic 8-track tape player.
Neutral: Some comments raised questions about the car's history and condition without expressing strong opinions either way. @DocMGL sought clarification on the car's maintenance history, noting the geographic distance between service locations. Various users, including @carfan1978 and @goldengup, pointed out areas of concern, like the trunk's appearance and paint quality, while also acknowledging that many classic cars from this era often have cosmetic imperfections. The seller, @Tpk1967, provided responses to inquiries, clarifying that he believes the car has had limited repainting due to its owner’s desire to keep it looking nice rather than as a result of an accident.
Negative: On the other hand, there were several cautious comments regarding the vehicle’s condition and authenticity of its mileage. @DocMGL and @TheCritic raised concerns about the possibility of previous accident damage based on the trunk's appearance and the paintwork history. Other users, like @BERELE and @Middler89, were dubious about the car's paint quality, citing potential orange peel and inconsistencies in the fit and finish typical of vehicles from the malaise era. @modes expressed skepticism about a body shop's involvement implying damage, while @urslor shared personal experiences that highlighted issues with parts replacement, suggesting a more complicated history than presented.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's beauty and overall presentation. @zggs mentioned the car's performance and aesthetics, indicating that it is the E9 to own, while @devin1967 simply called it 'Sweeeeet!!!'. @Still2big agreed with this sentiment, calling it a great-looking car. @e9er shared enthusiasm about the car's real Alpina wheels and classy interior, highlighting the overall positive impressions of the vehicle. Others, like @BMW23 and @Kstadt911, echoed similar feelings about the E9 being a standout, indicating a strong appreciation for its design and performance, with @Jekyll noting the car's impressive condition with no visible body rust. Overall, the car has garnered significant praise for its quality and restoration.
Neutral: Several comments included inquiries and requests for clarification regarding the vehicle's features and restoration details. @BubRudy requested additional information about the restoration work done on the shock towers, while @Tachycardia and @urielle asked about the engine work and the original toolbox's presence, respectively. This indicates a shared interest in understanding the car's history and condition. Furthermore, @Sniff38 raised questions about the hood and trunk gaps, needing expert insights on typical conditions for these models. While some commenters expressed concern over specific components, such as the sunroof operation and the absence of rear seatbelts, the discussions remained constructive and focused on gathering information rather than outright criticism of the vehicle.
Negative: There were some concerns expressed by commenters regarding various aspects of the car. @Fk5243 highlighted the lack of air conditioning, prompting discussion on whether it was indeed present. @Bigmotorssmallcar criticized the sunroof alignment and noted that the sunroof mechanism is from a different manufacturer, suggesting potential fitment issues. Similarly, some commenters pointed out the alignment gaps in the trunk and hood, suggesting that this might not meet factory standards. Additionally, @nimo insisted that the wheels were Alpina-styled and not authentic, raising questions about parts authenticity. Overall, these concerns indicate that while many appreciate the car, there are notable criticisms regarding specific features and details that prospective buyers should be aware of.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Rmattern3838 (The Seller) describes the 2006 Cayman S as a "dream come true", highlighting its excellent condition and appealing driving experience that attracts attention. An inspection by @Ataylor18 reinforced these claims, with positive feedback about the car's handling and performance during a test drive, affirming that it looks even better in person than in photos. Additionally, @Rmattern3838 shared that the oil reports from Blackstone show no mechanical issues, further building confidence in the vehicle's maintenance and reliability.
Neutral: Commenters engaged with specific questions and insights regarding the vehicle's history and technical aspects. @Peterdeutsch inquired about the previous owners and requested a recent oil analysis report, to which @Rmattern3838 provided reassuring information about the car's ownership lineage and service history. Other commenters like @golling and @rgfulks asked relevant questions about known issues like the bearing problem and wheel types, reflecting a methodological interest in the vehicle's specifications without indicating a strong bias in either direction.
Negative: Concerns were raised about potential discrepancies in the vehicle's ownership history, with @jmk9911 noting a difference spotted between Carfax reports, claiming ten previous owners instead of six as stated by @Rmattern3838. This could lead to some skepticism regarding the integrity of the listing. @Thomas54 brought up worries about bore scoring, a common issue with these models, although @Rmattern3838 defended the car's condition by stating there are no signs of this problem, mentioning normal oil consumption and clean tailpipe emissions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly praising the setup of its engine and the additional gas tank for long-distance travel. @tmalefyt, the seller, noted that the FJ40 passes California smog testing consistently and is well-maintained. @rustyray highlighted the uniqueness of a 1977 FJ40 with a V8 engine swap that meets emission standards, calling it a "unicorn" in the market, while other commenters recognized the appeal of the vehicle's vintage look.
Neutral: Several discussions revolved around the modifications made to the vehicle, particularly concerning the heater system and the brake configurations. @syncroadventure raised multiple questions about the heater setup, which the seller admitted knowledge gaps on since the modifications were made by the previous owner. Additionally, the vehicle's smog certification was discussed, with @syncroadventure urging for a more current certification to ensure confidence for potential buyers in California, given the state's strict vehicle regulations.
Negative: However, some concerns were raised about the seller's engagement and responsiveness to inquiries. @syncroadventure expressed frustration with the lack of engagement from the seller regarding critical questions about the vehicle's condition and performance. The absence of detailed pictures of essential areas and a driving video prompted doubts about the vehicle's condition, leading some to suggest that the low miles since the seller's purchase might not be a positive indicator, and that the bidding would be affected by the seller's communication.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous commenters praised the 1998 Porsche Boxster for its appealing design and impressive specifications. @Johnnyracer222 expressed enthusiasm for the color combination of Arctic silver and Boxster red leather, describing it as the best choice. Multiple users echoed sentiments of trust towards the seller, @Collectibleclassics, highlighting their commitment to transparency, smooth transactions, and high customer satisfaction reflected in their 4.9/5.0 Google reviews. Comments regarding the car's maintenance history also generated a positive atmosphere, with the seller addressing inquiries about the vehicle's IMS bearing replacement and recent servicing.
Neutral: Inquiries about practical aspects of the vehicle led to some neutral exchanges among users. @DThiry88 asked about fitting golf clubs in the trunk, to which @GRS1st confirmed that they had successfully done so with their similar vehicle. Other users raised questions related to the included accessories, such as whether all keys and tools were present, and about the removal of a CD changer, prompting @Collectibleclassics to provide clarification and assurance regarding the state of the vehicle. The seller indicated that the car was well-maintained and not high maintenance, inviting potential buyers to conduct a pre-purchase inspection (PPI).
Negative: Conversely, some negative comments emerged, particularly from @mustang850 who shared a personal experience of facing significant repair costs after purchasing a vehicle from the seller. This prompted further discussions about the potential need for cautious inspection when considering this seller, with users like @darkstar0821 and @joeveto indicating they were deterred by the negative feedback. The exchange raised concerns regarding previous auction experiences, leading to additional scrutiny on @Collectibleclassics's reputation as buyers expressed unease and advised each other to conduct careful evaluations before making a purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Spedrcr describes the vehicle as "the definition of perfect patina," signaling appreciation for its aesthetic appeal. @Edelweiss_Autowerks (The Seller) calls it a "GORGEOUS classic 911" and expresses confidence that it will make someone very happy. @daepp shares admiration for the car's condition and praises the thorough documentation of its features and issues, suggesting it could provide years of trouble-free driving pleasure.
Neutral: @Lodgeskins comments on the vehicle's dark green color, noting it appears black in some photos, which is echoed by @56PackardMan. The Seller acknowledges the dark green color that becomes visible in sunlight and mentions the underbody condition regarding rust. @BhsAAA expresses interest in information about rust and recalls his own experiences with a similar model, noting the car's performance in winter conditions. @axioma inquires about authenticity documents, while @ebrand raises concerns about the age of the tires but appreciates the Seller's honesty regarding the vehicle's condition. @Lodgeskins suggests the Seller's representation of the car is trustworthy.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, @ebrand questions the decision to use old tires, suggesting it could detract from the vehicle's value. @Floridalime points out that the drive video footage did not capture the car in sunlight, potentially failing to showcase its true color. @Alfetta70s humorously wonders if a true Porsche enthusiast can resist the urge to restore the vehicle, implying that its imperfections may be bothersome to some buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments regarding the 1985 Mercedes Benz 380 SL highlight its remarkable condition and customer appeal. @showerfan praises the vehicle as absolutely beautiful and stunning, emphasizing that it deserves to fetch a high price. The seller, @lloyddon1, reinforces this perception by stating that the car is a time capsule and offers unique qualities such as original parts, documented low mileage of just 38,000, and a stellar one-owner history. Many commenters express excitement over the car’s appearance and originality, showcasing a collective admiration for this classic vehicle.
Neutral: Commenters like @19willys46 and @jint inquire about specific details of the car, including the condition of its carpet and timing chain. @lloyddon1, the seller, responds to these inquiries, confirming the car's authenticity and reassurances about its integrity, suggesting that the carpeting's color variation may be due to lighting conditions. Additionally, there are questions about the car's storage duration and the irregular engine noise, with @lloyddon1 explaining the mechanics involved and offering options for potential buyers who wish to inspect the vehicle in person.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by commenters regarding the vehicle's irregular engine noise. @justaglitch questions why this issue hasn't been addressed prior to the sale, hinting at possible buyer apprehensions. @lloyddon1 acknowledges this concern but also mentions that a service technician advised that the noise may resolve with regular driving. While the seller attempts to alleviate skepticism by inviting personal inspections and offering to work with warranty providers, such comments reflect a degree of caution from potential buyers regarding the car's operational readiness.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @t8willey (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a legendary 4-wheel drive, emphasizing its rugged and beautiful design, inviting potential buyers to participate in the auction. The seller's enthusiasm for the Defender 90 shines through in their welcoming comments, indicating a strong belief in the vehicle's appeal and authenticity.
Neutral: Commenters, like @tmatkin1 and @DDhero, seek clarification on specific details regarding the vehicle's heating system and ownership history, which are important but neutral inquiries. @WAGONBOYTD points out the quiet nature of the auction while expressing concerns about the visual information provided, particularly regarding potential issues with the rear cross member, suggesting a need for more information to assess the vehicle's overall condition properly.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about the vehicle's condition, particularly @WAGONBOYTD's worries regarding the rear cross member, hinting at possible issues with the chassis. This skepticism regarding the vehicle's maintenance and the effectiveness of the heater, as raised by @tmatkin1, may discourage potential buyers looking for a well-maintained classic. Overall, these negative remarks indicate potential red flags that could impact the auction's success.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Copa2003: Niiiiiice! @RKR1: Beautiful……I want it. But will be traveling and will miss the ending. good luck and I am close! I have had 2. @Tmac327: What a great 911! This is one of Porsche's best colors. It looks amazing in bright sunlight.
Neutral: @JB423: That bid took the fun right out of this one. @CanadaCorner: Curious as to what happened to the paint on this car, with #42 as an example. Damage around the body tracks almost like flo-vis paint on an F1 car. Caught in a sand storm? Good luck!
Negative: @2Many_cars: Yeah 40k + paint ++ 🎨 dunno. @Johnnyboy813: Why? @rarrods: Does it leak oil? Are there service records?
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @603blueM2 praised the car for being great and nicely modified, while @Bmboyd (The Seller) highlighted the added warranty from carbahn and the overall fantastic driving experience enhanced by the tune. @PushDaEnvelope expressed excitement about the Adro conversion, commenting on its dramatic improvement of the G87's looks. @zdoctor shared admiration for the front bumper, noting it gives the car an aggressive look that fits well. @ANTHEMAVM found the vehicle beautiful and enjoyed seeing their M2 every time they go to the garage, indicating a strong affection for the model.
Neutral: Some commenters noted differing opinions on aesthetic choices. @ElVerde mentioned a personal dislike for the Afro front bumper but acknowledged the car's overall excellence in the market, particularly praising the Carbon Buckets. @gshaffer inquired about the car's suspension and alignment adjustments, possibly showing concern for performance reliability. @Scott_GTO asked about the vehicle's emissions compliance, showing interest in its environmental suitability.
Negative: Negative feedback centered around concerns regarding the front bumper design. @OwenPoodiack expressed doubt about the large grille openings being practical and suggested that alternative grills might be necessary for better protection. @sy1616 raised a question about why many people are selling their M2s quickly, hinting at potential issues beyond mere preference. Additionally, @ElVerde criticized the grille openings, stating that they find Zunsport grills unnecessary and unattractive.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received positive feedback regarding its appearance and drivetrain upgrades. @Valiantjim described it as a "nice looking Dart" and mentioned the significant upgrades, such as the four-barrel 273 "Charger" engine and an 8.75 rear end, which are not common features. Other commenters like @y95 expressed enthusiasm about driving the car to Idaho, highlighting its appeal as a fun and unique car that is not frequently seen.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarifications about the vehicle's current working conditions. @SHREG (The Seller) responded to @broodie about the status of the horn and light switch, noting that while the horn is inoperable, the brake lights and turn signals work fine. In regards to the car's condition, @6970Wings inquired about potential flaws in the paint and body, to which @SHREG assured that the body is straight and the paint is in good shape, emphasizing that it has been a desert car with no rust.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding certain functionalities of the vehicle. @jeffdugan highlighted potential issues related to the headlights and instrumentation, as the headlight switch is faulty, rendering them inoperable. Additionally, the heater core is disconnected, meaning the heater will not function unless reconnected. @Nacoocheejohn and @agh19 requested pictures of the trunk, expressing concern over the missing trunk lock, indicating that there may be more issues needing to be addressed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous commenters have praised the 928 for its aesthetic appeal and perceived maintenance quality. @lemondzurich noted that the vehicle appears exceptionally well cared for, likening its condition to that of a car with much lower mileage. @SirMercsALot described it as a "sweet looking 928S4," while @Zig928 shared their long-term ownership experience, detailing the car's thorough upkeep and expressing confidence in its reliability for long journeys. Commenters also appreciated the visual appeal of the car, with @Tobyallen expressing that it might change their mind about black 928s, indicating that the undercarriage looks well maintained and that they value the owner's efforts to keep the vehicle pristine.
Neutral: Some discussions revolved around the vehicle's mechanical aspects and maintenance history, highlighting the importance of timing belt and water pump replacements. @DSO inquired about a pre-purchase inspection, while @blpski emphasized the critical nature of such maintenance on an interference engine. The seller, @Zig928, provided reassurance about the car's condition by confirming that the timing belt was replaced about 10,000 miles ago and that a new PorKen tensioner was installed. However, concerns about the car's electrical functions came up, with @Toomany928 asking about specific features like the sunroof and torque tube, while @CR427 requested clarification on various operational components of the vehicle.
Negative: Some negative sentiments emerged regarding potential maintenance costs and concerns over the timing belt and tensioner service history. @Petrolhead72 warned that maintenance on these vehicles can be costly and highlighted the risk of buying an inexpensive 928 without expecting additional repair expenses. @blpski echoed these sentiments, stressing that issues related to the timing belt can lead to significant damage if not addressed appropriately. Comments also indicated skepticism about the overall investment required in maintaining such a vehicle, with some users expressing concern about hidden problems that could arise after the purchase, making clear that anyone interested should be prepared for ongoing maintenance costs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Gettin_old praised the vehicle, noting the large wheels suited the classic aesthetic and expressed a fondness for the interior design. @mr_smee echoed these sentiments, calling the car's color stunning and full of swagger. @Dollycat3 highlighted the beauty of the Rose Beige Metallic finish, while @PiRround remarked that it was one of the best-looking T-birds they had seen, appreciating the color and wheels in harmony with the body style. @johnnyb11 loved the vehicle's nostalgic appearance and its association with 1960s television shows. @tlbrown143 shared a positive personal experience, describing the car as rock solid and beautiful in person, stating that it starts instantly and has no odd noises.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on the vehicle's specifications and condition. @BeeBeau inquired about the A/C refrigerant type, while @RadialSkid asked for clarification on a typographical error regarding the vehicle's safety switch. @corvettom9 raised questions about the air conditioning functionality, the condition of power windows, and details about the engine's rebuild status. @Bennie0118, the seller, addressed many of these inquiries directly, noting the uncertainties surrounding the car's past and providing additional images of the fender skirts and headliner as requested by other users. @Bennie0118 also mentioned the need for a driving video, confirming that it would be posted shortly.
Negative: @ski.dive questioned the condition of the headliner and asked about the presence of any damage, while @NateM1010 expressed concern regarding a potential rust hole in the floor and highlighted a perceived color mismatch on the quarter panel, seeking further clarification and images. @stilbo inquired about potential leaks in engine oil, transmission fluid, or coolant. @Racer2012 and @mlp222 raised concern over the air conditioning system's functionality post-repair. Additionally, @cscmanagement questioned whether the A/C was functioning cold, to which @Bennie0118 noted that the clutch needed replacement for the system to operate properly, highlighting some ongoing mechanical issues with the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and build quality. @cocomats describes it as a future classic and is excited about the potential of Singer building 914s. @Jimmyblues1959 praises the restomod, emphasizing its impressive power-to-weight ratio. Users like @rfoulds and @83turbo3.5 recommend the JWest shifter as a significant upgrade for improving the driving experience, affirming the car's appeal among enthusiasts. Others, such as @luxuryautomax, go as far as to call it 'Car Porn', showcasing the overall admiration for its aesthetics and performance.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions that highlight specific details about the car. @paulsunseri and @Rfoulds discuss the paint color, Phoenix Red, pointing out its true orange tone rather than red. @bparson and @fstntq ask about the transaxle model and the absence of climate control features in the car. Questions about various technical aspects, including suspension adjustments and the state of the engine tune, also reflect a balanced interest in the car's options and features. @911r (The Seller) provides clarifications on questions raised by potential buyers, boosting transparency.
Negative: While many comments are positive, some buyers express concerns regarding the vehicle's setup. @B27-14 criticizes the overall aesthetics of the taillights and raises doubts about the car being rushed to market. @Halvo questions the build quality concerning rust status and the suitability of the transmission and brakes given the engine power. @Ekmautner points out a potential tuning issue related to engine performance during acceleration. The suggestion from @Pete000 about adjusting the rear height echoes broader worries about the vehicle's stance and performance, indicating that some buyers see significant opportunities for improvement.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance and restoration quality. @RiffRaff noted the appealing color combination and referred to the car as perfect, while @williamdouglass complimented the cataloging efforts with pictures. @PaulFZMorgan shared positive sentiments about the spaciousness and comfort of his similar model, highlighting its practicality for weekend trips. @tmmk reminisced fondly about owning a similar model and praised the current seller's efforts, referring to the car as 'very nice'.
Neutral: Several comments included inquiries about the vehicle's features and specifics, such as @RiffRaff's question regarding the seat backs and @Tom_R.'s observation about the apparent lack of a heater. @Duncan_same_old contributed to a discussion about the differences in louvers found on various Morgan models, while @morganplus8 suggested potential modifications for heating. The seller, @tim54575, responded to these queries and provided additional information regarding the gauges and upholstery, ensuring clarity for potential bidders.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about certain features of the vehicle. @86Cab pointed out that the VIN plate was not original, mentioning that it was a reproduction, and discussed the vinyl upholstery as a drawback. @Tom_R. expressed that the lack of a heater would make long drives in cold weather less comfortable, highlighting practical issues. @Duncan_same_old echoed this sentiment, suggesting that driving a Morgan in the winter could be problematic without adequate heating.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their love for the Midnight Blue version of the car, noting its fun driving experience. @EireCab mentioned their fondness for this variant, suggesting they might consider acquiring another. @whatupgus shared a similar sentiment about their 2007 model, emphasizing the joy these cars bring. Additionally, @mccand appreciated the fact that the 997.1 model is a driven car, which adds character and value to the vehicle.
Neutral: @Euro_Classica, the seller, provided detailed information about the vehicle during the auction. They highlighted that the car is ready for a new owner, mentioning recent maintenance such as an oil and filter change and the installation of a new suspension to reach factory specifications. They encouraged potential bidders to conduct thorough due diligence and clarified some logistical details regarding the auction process, including payment and viewing options.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition. @sorlac questioned whether the rear bumper had been repainted due to signs of a minor fender bender and @02911dog inquired about the availability of the stock airbox, which is crucial for smog certification in California. @Kosmere also requested confirmation of any bore scoring evaluations or oil analyses performed on the vehicle, in addition to more visual evidence like cold start or convertible roof videos. There were also notes about a missing lug bolt on one of the wheels, with @Sketch1974 and @PaulGri pointing out these issues, which raised concerns about the vehicle's readiness for safe operation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @gmagno commented that it's a very nice ride and that this auction will definitely indicate the current market value. @BaerBronco shared that the 2nd gen Ford Bronco is their favorite and praised its colors and interior. @Minter-fab remarked on how clean the vehicle is and wished the seller good luck with the sale. @Lori3617 also described the Bronco as beautiful and highlighted the appealing color combination. Meanwhile, @MontanaBroncos recalled the unique color scheme and comfort of the old bench seat. Overall, many potential buyers seem impressed with the vehicle's aesthetic and condition.
Neutral: Many comments provided inquiries about technical aspects and history of the vehicle. @Jthronin was curious if the engine was a replacement or rebuilt original, while @843clarence asked for details about the extent of the rebuild, including the drivetrain. @Ekirsch05 posed several questions about the repainting process, the original parts, and the functioning of gauges. @Bjesel responded that the vehicle's paint job was rated better than factory, but they admitted to not having receipts for the work done. Additionally, there was a detailed discussion regarding the rear power window functionality and whether it was included.
Negative: Some comments hinted at potential concerns regarding the vehicle. @SebastianH7070 questioned the reason for selling, and @Ekirsch05 emphasized the need for more information to justify the current bidding price, suggesting that unanswered questions regarding the drivetrain and functionality of certain features might cause hesitance among potential buyers. Furthermore, there was uncertainty around whether all original parts were included in the sale, which @Jthronin and others seemed to be calling for clarification on, and @Bjesel admitted to experiencing issues with the gas gauge working intermittently.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @BaerBronco praised the vehicle for its sweet Supercab design and awesome two-tone colors, while @maw06 complimented it as a beast of a truck, expressing nostalgic feelings from their youth. @chesselkins noted that the truck looked even nicer in person and highlighted the high quality of the owner's other works, reflecting a reputation for thoroughness and quality. The seller, @alexg182, also received commendations for the truck's solid condition and professional modifications, with bidders expressing enthusiasm about the auction.
Neutral: Several commenters raised logistical questions, including @JHernandez inquiring about the truck's payload capacity, while @bearden asked for details on overall length and height. @Lookylou pointed out an observation regarding the rear backup lights and their functioning, seeking clarification from the seller. @carstruck requested information about the frame number, acknowledging that the frame is not original but looking for further details on its implications for registration, which @alexg182 addressed openly, focusing on the quality of the truck's installation.
Negative: Concerns were also expressed, with @Cougarxr71970 highlighting unsecured brake lines as a potential issue, followed by @Ugly1 questioning the mounting of shackle bushings on the front leaf springs, describing them as looking sketchy in images. @65Panrider pointed out the absence of listed axle ratios, considering this crucial information, while @phantomwizard lamented the vehicle's automatic transmission option, indicating a preference for manual transmissions. These comments reflect some apprehensions about the vehicle's mechanical details.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Johnnyracer222 believes that the collectability of this generation of Ducati motorcycles will increase over time, particularly the R model, expressing optimism for the 999R's future value. @citxmech describes the 999 as one of the most visually stunning bikes ever created, noting its ahead-of-its-time design. Additionally, @magwire finds the 999R absolutely gorgeous and believes there are many stunning bikes on the market currently. @Meccanica shares that riding their 999R Xerox was an exhilarating experience, highlighting its accessible power and enjoyable handling on backcountry roads.
Neutral: @hughespt (The Seller) acknowledges @8wayside's inquiry about the monopost tail section, confirming it is not included. @ScottAlan raises some valid concerns regarding potential signs of damage on the swing arm and the finish of the fairings, to which @hughespt responds with clarification and additional images. @JSR29 questions the finish of specific parts and @hughespt answers that those parts have been painted gloss black. @SilverstoneE90M3 and @hughespt engage in a dialogue regarding the history and current condition of the bike, discussing past scratches and additional mechanical details.
Negative: @ScottAlan notes the presence of scrapes on the left swing arm and questions the condition of the paint, suggesting potential damage. @mhipp5280 inquires about the cause of the road rash observed in the photos. @Soarer and @8wayside express disappointment that the original monoposto tail section is not part of the sale, indicating a lack of complete parts for potential buyers. The concerns raised about the cosmetic condition of the bike and the absence of certain components may deter some interested buyers.
![]() |
Single-Family-Owned 2004 Dodge Ram 2500 SLT Quad Cab 4×4 Cummins 6-Speed
3D7KU28C14G101918
Lot 220443
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is highly regarded by several commenters for its size and functionality. @acett shared their positive experience with a similar model, praising its reliability even at high mileage. The seller, @williamj3, is responsive to inquiries, providing detailed answers and assistance. For instance, @McBoomFace expressed appreciation for the quick responses regarding the truck's modifications and condition, highlighting the seller's willingness to communicate and share information. Additionally, the seller mentions that the truck has the 4-wheel drive functioning flawlessly and has only towed lighter loads, which supports its maintenance of a good operational state.
Neutral: Comments reflect a genuine interest in the details of the truck, with several questions about its features and modifications. @CoreyWilco inquired about the fender flares, which were confirmed to be professionally installed during previous ownership, indicating the modifications were done thoughtfully. @pbita54 requested better images of the window sticker, leading to @williamj3 providing improved photos. Furthermore, @Admant pointed out crucial information about the model's year, thereby informing potential bidders of important distinctions that could influence their bidding strategy.
Negative: However, not all comments were entirely positive, as there were concerns raised regarding the vehicle's condition. @McBoomFace expressed several inquiries about the truck's functionalities, specifically the A/C and the condition of various controls, indicating that there might be issues that require attention. The seller confirmed that the driver-side rear door's power window and lock are not functioning properly, which could be a potential drawback for some buyers. Additionally, there was mention of fading clear coat on the roof, which, while not severe, still raises questions about overall aesthetic maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @simsimma (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a well-maintained 2005 model FGT with a VVTI engine, 73,000 miles, and all VIN tags present, which contributes to its perceived reliability. The recent timing and water pump replacement adds to its appeal. The seller also highlights the truck's location in Blaine, WA, assuring potential bidders of no damages and the inclusion of a new battery with an 84-month warranty.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about specific aspects of the vehicle, revealing their interest in details like stock exhaust, emissions compliance, and service history. @wop33 questions about the exhaust, while @bigpasta requests clarification regarding a suspected crack in the muffler and close-up photos of the upper control arms. @WIZZZZ raises concerns about previous service records and outstanding recalls, but @simsimma counters these queries by providing information on service records and the nature of the recalls.
Negative: Some comments express dissatisfaction or confusion regarding the vehicle's status. @wei1936 questions the rationale behind selling a vehicle with outstanding recalls, suggesting it would be easier for the seller to resolve them before listing. @rm23 points out an apparent issue with the bed cover shock, raising concerns about potential damage or wear to the truck due to the cover. Such inquiries highlight some apprehensions potential buyers have about the vehicle's overall condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @McFood described the vehicle as "Cute as a button and twice as yellow!", highlighting its appealing appearance and vibrant color, suggesting a sense of charm and allure. Additionally, @kingkarmann noted the Karmann Ghia's collectability and the sustained value of these vehicles, indicating that this specific model could be a worthwhile investment for someone who is dedicated to its restoration and care. Moreover, @kingkarmann also expressed a fondness for the VW color, associating it with "L13 Saturn Yellow", suggesting that the color adds to the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: @KnappStout inquired about the car's original color and details regarding a "total loss vehicle due to damage", reflecting a desire for further clarity regarding the vehicle's history and condition. @sosseptic (The Seller) provided some background by revealing that the car was originally purchased in 2014 as a birthday gift and noted that while it was yellow at the time of purchase, alterations may have been made regarding its original color. There is an acknowledgment of previous damage, although not much detail is given about the extent of the repairs completed.
Negative: @kingkarmann warned that the front-end damage typically would not result in an insurance write-off, which raises concerns about the quality of the previous repairs. He advised prospective buyers to inspect the vehicle closely, specifically pointing out that the Karmann Ghia has particular weaknesses, indicating potential issues with rocker integrity and overall craftsmanship of the repair work. This caution suggests that while the vehicle may be attractive, it requires careful consideration and potentially significant work to ensure its reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, with @ziodesign expressing excitement about the sunroof coupe and wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @dhoeger reminisced fondly about owning a similar model, deeming the front bumper visually straight, attributing the perceived issue to an optical illusion. @park-on-a-hill highlighted the car as a fantastic example of a C sunroof coupe, suggesting that minor fixes should not overshadow its overall value, while @Hoppy18 and @Dollycat3 admired its beauty and rare features, confirming it as a highly desirable model.
Neutral: Commenters provided insights into various technical aspects of the car's features, such as @cdeckhoff noting its Euro import status and potential alterations to headlights and taillights. @revron offered practical advice on the front bumper's alignment, suggesting that adjustment is manageable. The seller, @Ims, participated actively, addressing concerns and clarifying details about the vehicle's specifications, including the heater system and restoration process. The history behind the color change was discussed, indicating how restoration choices affect market appeal.
Negative: Some users raised concerns about specific technical aspects, particularly regarding the front bumper's alignment as mentioned by @Prewar_Roadster, who found it perplexing that a restored car would exhibit such a misalignment. @victor_skirmants pointed out potential issues with the muffler supports, prompting further clarification from @Ims about the installation. @BobSoCal remarked on the financial sensibility of restoring versus buying a fixer-upper, which hinted at skepticism about the restoration costs versus the car's market value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @RundeepResources, the seller, emphasized that the vehicle is in outstanding condition, stating it features a well-maintained history with no significant issues. He noted the car's exceptional appearance under bright lighting, confirming the photos accurately represent the vehicle's condition, with minimal blemishes. Additionally, several users, including @iFlyer and @thouser, praised the seller's responsiveness and willingness to provide detailed answers to inquiries, contributing to a positive perception of the vehicle and the selling process.
Neutral: @thouser and @Cris777 raised several questions about the vehicle's history, particularly concerning past damages and repairs. @RundeepResources addressed these concerns by highlighting that the vehicle's reports from Experian AutoCheck and Carfax were contradictory, but he reassured potential buyers of the car's status and impressive service history. Other comments from buyers like @acesnyc inquired about the reserve price, showing an ongoing engagement with the auction.
Negative: @thouser pointed out potential concerns regarding the paint job on the front of the vehicle, indicating an obvious mismatch and questioning the quality of the repairs. @BurningDinos also expressed confusion over the reverse camera operation, indicating a lack of clarity in the feature's functionality. Furthermore, there were questions about the durability of specific components like the valve cover gaskets and water pump, suggesting a degree of uncertainty among potential buyers about the vehicle's overall condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @rexfox shared a nostalgic memory about a similar truck, recalling fond experiences from his childhood riding with an older member of his hunting party. He appreciated the sound of the V8 engine and the driving experience depicted in the video, calling the truck 'very cool.'
Neutral: @jabenso, the seller, explained that the truck was used as a daily driver around 2007 but has been mostly stored since then. The seller acknowledged that the tires have been on the truck since before 2007. Additional information about the side tool box latch being functional and the purpose of the door being open in pictures was also provided. @SFO inquired about the status of the exhaust system related to the driving video, to which @jabenso confirmed the presence of headers without an additional exhaust system.
Negative: @William6100 raised concerns about the vehicle's 2-wheel drive status and questioned the reasoning behind installing headers on a high-mileage 352 engine, prompting inquiries about the truck's past usage. @William6100 also asked if the seller had researched the age of the tires, implying the need for replacements. @weidhopper expressed a desire for more detailed photos of specific areas of the truck and questioned the condition of the tools in the bed, highlighting further uncertainties about the vehicle's state.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Miles_S (The Seller) has described the vehicle as a wonderful early Mustang with a long-term family ownership history. The car is said to drive very well and is in a clean, presentable driver quality condition. Commenters like @ChasinFords appreciate the deeper red color, noting that it pairs well with the interior and encourages future owners to focus on driving and creating memories with the car without worrying about its cosmetic flaws. The inclusion of a new battery tray in the sale is also seen as a positive addition.
Neutral: Commenters such as @mlesko73 and @foqus have mixed feelings about the car's condition. @mlesko73 points out that the Mustang is almost 60 years old and has undergone some refurbishment rather than full restoration, implying that potential buyers should maintain realistic expectations. @foqus raises a question about the air conditioning's functionality, hinting at a possible missing belt, and suggests that a cold start and driving video would be beneficial for potential buyers. @thorofare and @mlesko73 engage in a friendly discussion clarifying the intent behind comments about potential repairs needed.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding minor imperfections and maintenance needs. @thorofare expresses a sense of frustration about potential repairs that come to mind when looking at the car, describing it as a personal affliction. @giorgitd comments on the slow start observed in the cold start video, questioning what might be causing the issue, which adds a hint of concern regarding the vehicle's overall reliability. Overall, while many see the car as a good opportunity, there's an acknowledgment of its age and the likelihood of required maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 2023 Land Rover 130 Trophy Edition is receiving positive attention for its unique features and cool specification. @WAGONBOYTD highlighted that it stands out among other models on the market, noting the average mileage and great resale opportunity, bolstered by an added service contract which enhances its appeal. Additionally, @starbai shared a personal account of owning a similar Defender 130, praising its flawless performance and blend of luxury and ruggedness, indicating strong satisfaction with the vehicle's capabilities and ride quality.
Neutral: Various comments indicate that the vehicle has some features still under discussion, such as the functionality of the rear vents and the specifics of the service contract. @Aegishjalmur requested more images of the front bumper, which @alsamsgss (The Seller) assured would be provided promptly. Other discussions revolved around its GVWR and the potential to qualify for tax benefits, with users seeking further information to make informed decisions about the auction.
Negative: On the downside, there were some concerns raised about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the front windshield which had to be replaced due to damage from a rock. Although @alsamsgss (The Seller) provided details about past service and maintenance, potential buyers like @Cellularsteve sought more clarity on usage history and any past issues, reflecting an underlying caution among bidders regarding the vehicle's technical history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The Saab Sonett III has garnered a lot of enthusiasm among its admirers, with many praising its unique design and classic appeal. Commentors like @Thesunisrising express a fond nostalgia for these quirky cars, highlighting their 2-seater charm and likening them to other beloved models. @Tigers196884 notes that such a well-preserved example is hard to find, emphasizing its quality and the allure it holds for Saab owners. @LotusChappyS1, having driven the vehicle personally, asserts that it is as perfect as it appears and reassures potential buyers of their satisfaction with the next ownership. Furthermore, @Sparrownaut emphasizes its supercar looks, which distinctly sets it apart from other vehicles.
Neutral: Commentors are covering a range of inquiries and insights regarding the Saab Sonett III's features and specifications. @Chucarlson questions the comfort for larger drivers, to which @ZurichClassicMotors assures that it accommodates even taller individuals. Meanwhile, @JIMMY provides technical details about the car's freewheel mechanism and shares his knowledge about its condition. The conversation also touches on styling variations and potential modifications with @CSGC asking about the possibility of adding lumbar seat cushions. There's a general consensus on the car's good condition, but some acknowledge that not all aspects, such as the seat material, are original, sparking informative exchanges.
Negative: Some community members raised concerns or critical observations about the Saab Sonett III's condition and features. @TeamHu mentions that while this car is being promoted as possibly the best example, he feels it represents an emotional exaggeration given the rarity of truly flawless models. @JIMMY points out specific details indicating that the rear tail light panel is not in original condition and questions the authenticity of the seat cloth. Additionally, @jrs9191 inquires about the car's weight and performance characteristics, reflecting a desire for more transparency about its operational condition. Overall, while these discussions add a layer of scrutiny, they are part of a positive engagement within the community about classic car ownership.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @thorgoth mentioned that the car looks good and expressed a pleasant surprise at the seller's name, finding it reminiscent of a famous Italian footballer. @clawson9 also shared their appreciation for the vehicle, stating that the Carbon Black color makes the body lines look particularly attractive. Furthermore, @Paolorosso, the seller, highlighted that the car has been well taken care of and included a Cover Craft car cover as part of the sale, emphasizing its uniqueness as a special car experience.
Neutral: @RadStuff brought up a personal connection, noting that they grew up in the area and owned a similar model, suggesting that they might have crossed paths with the seller. @Gmufiji inquired about the history of the vehicle's maintenance by asking if an oil analysis had been performed since 2021 and the mileage at that time, indicating interest in the vehicle's condition without a strong bias either way. @Paolorosso responded with factual information about the oil analysis and mileage to provide clarity on the car's maintenance history.
Negative: While most comments were positive or neutral, @clawson9 raised a concern about the vehicle's rod bearings by questioning if they were still original, indicating some anxiety about potential issues even if it may have been a commonly asked question. The seller, @Paolorosso, acknowledged this concern but maintained that the car's performance has been validated through previous oil testing. This exchange subtly highlighted an underlying tension regarding the vehicle's long-term reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Yungun commented on the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, expressing appreciation for its sharp design and convertible feature, labeling it as a very attractive Corvette. Other users, like @JustJed, showed interest in the vehicle's features, asking for additional visuals such as top-down pictures and video demonstrations of the electric top operating, indicating that the car has captivating functionalities that potential buyers may find appealing. Overall, there is a strong sense of admiration for the car's looks and features from several commenters.
Neutral: @User261483 inquired about the original radio system in the car and the difficulty of removing the upgraded Sony unit, demonstrating a practical interest in the vehicle's equipment. The seller, @csvette, confirmed that the original radio is not present, providing a straightforward response to the question without any negative undertone. Meanwhile, others like @PTC57 focused on specifics regarding paint condition and confirmed the newness of the tires, showing a detailed interest in the vehicle's overall condition and performance.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Danielj06 regarding the potential issues related to the harmonic balancer, a known problem with these cars, and questioned the necessity for a video to ensure it was functioning properly. Additionally, @2Tall4Sum pointed out a past 'no-start/hard start condition' serviced by C&S Corvettes, questioning if this might indicate underlying issues because of the aftermarket head unit. In response, @csvette addressed these worries by explaining that the car had been serviced after being dormant for three months and had only minor issues, but the initial concerns reflect apprehension from potential buyers regarding the car's reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @joeniner (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm for the resto-mod TR6 he is selling, noting his background as a motorcycle mechanic and his passion for tinkering with cars. He highlights the thorough documentation of his work on the vehicle, emphasizing that potential buyers can ask any questions they might have. Commenters like @Myoldcut and @Dale1120 praise the car's charm and acknowledge its classic British car characteristics, such as the oil leak that many enthusiasts find endearing.
Neutral: When asked by @steve07gt3 about the convertible top fitting with the current rollbar, @joeniner (The Seller) responds that he hasn't tried fitting a top but believes it might work as the rollbar isn't too tall. He mentions that the car has only been used in fair weather under his ownership, and although he has the top frame, he does not have a canvas for it. @Jamesdean004 humorously inquires about where to place gloves in the car, prompting a lighthearted exchange with @joeniner (The Seller).
Negative: While the comments have generally been positive and light, there could be a concern regarding the lack of a convertible top, which may limit the car's usability in different weather conditions. @steve07gt3's question about the fit of a convertible top indicates uncertainty about the vehicle's modifications and might indicate a barrier for some potential buyers. @joeniner (The Seller)'s mention of the car's fair-weather use may also raise questions about its durability and functionality in varied driving conditions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Ronson68L78 expresses nostalgia for the vehicle, reminiscing about his past ownership of a Super Eagle and highlighting his admiration for this bike, suggesting it would make a fantastic addition to his collection next to his classic Mustang. @LFFInc (The Seller) replies positively to @Ronson68L78's comments, reinforcing the beauty of the bike and its capability to make a proud owner happy. This demonstrates that the vehicle has an appealing aesthetic and possesses a significant charm for classic vehicle enthusiasts.
Neutral: @jdjonesdr shares a personal connection to the vehicle, mentioning a friend's similar bike which adds an element of curiosity regarding its history. @LFFInc (The Seller) clarifies that this bike originated from a large collection in Ohio, offering a bit of context about its background. @oldcardoc emphasizes a technical feature of the vehicle, mentioning its 7 H/P engine and chain primary drive, which suggests that the bike has notably practical specifications valued by collectors.
Negative: @topsound points out a technical issue with the video not playing, which detracts from the overall presentation of the vehicle and may hinder interested buyers from fully engaging with the listing. This comment reflects a potential barrier for prospective bidders who rely on multimedia to evaluate the product's condition and appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reveal a strong appreciation for the vehicle, with @Scott68GTO describing it as a "beautiful girl" and @Rivetting calling it "stunning." Enthusiasts like @wirekat highlight its resemblance to their own cars and express admiration for its beauty. @rickaz praises the car's refined elegance and tasteful modifications, while @Cougar_Guy predicts it will fetch a high price at auction, showing confidence in its value. Everyone seems to recognize the significant effort that @GMercury (The Seller) put into restoring the car, especially after hearing the detailed restoration history shared as part of the sale description.
Neutral: Several users have nuanced perspectives, noting both the strengths and weaknesses of the vehicle. @dersiddy prompts a discussion about the leather seats, which @GMercury (The Seller) confirms are reupholstered vinyl that resemble the original. Comments about the car's customizations and additional features suggest varying preferences—for instance, @wirekat mentions a personal desire for the "Cougar" emblems to be included. Many commenters share their own car experiences or express nostalgia, reflecting a collective interest in the car's history and how it fits within the community's broader narrative around classic vehicles.
Negative: There are some constructive critiques, particularly regarding features that could be improved or added. @bringbacktheStick expresses disappointment over the absence of air conditioning, calling it a necessity for summer driving in California’s heat. @CrankyGoat points out a defect in the alignment of the headlight covers, suggesting that it could be a matter of care or knowledge, hinting at a lack of attention to detail in restoration. Such critiques, while less prevalent, showcase the high standards of classic car enthusiasts and indicate areas where the vehicle may not fully meet expectations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @dmarti02 expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, stating it looks sweet and admires the interior color, speculating it to be Lightstone. @ecartaya describes it as a beautiful truck, asking about seal integrity and air conditioning performance, reflecting confidence in the vehicle’s condition. @monchichi finds the truck amazing with a charming presentation and wishes he could buy it immediately, while @WAGONBOYTD appreciates the presentation and describes it as a nice vehicle despite it being a northern car.
Neutral: Comments from @enthusiastic_enthusiast (The Seller) clarify that the truck, originally Ardennes Green, has undergone a striking white paint job but asserts there is no rust found on the body or chassis. Several users, including @mikecweber4, seek clarification on the engine type and model specifications, while @dogMan3 asks about service records and the restoration process. The seller indicates that while detailed invoices are not available, a summary of the restoration costs and services will be provided.
Negative: @joewagoneer questions the original color and potential rust issues, indicating concern over the vehicle's condition. @WAGONBOYTD states that the color change is a shame, suggesting that the original Ardennes Green is more desirable than the new paint. @DHGreen points out discrepancies with badging and wheel styles, hinting at potential authenticity issues that could dissuade buyers. @medic327 demands more comprehensive invoice documentation, indicating dissatisfaction with the current listing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, with @skonker describing it as a 'Beauty!'. The seller, @Jcorey38, highlights the vehicle's long-standing family history, indicating a sense of value and pride in ownership. This connection likely adds to the allure for potential buyers who appreciate vehicles with a background and story.
Neutral: @Jcorey38, the seller, is engaged and welcomes questions about the truck, suggesting a willingness to provide information and assurance about the vehicle's condition and features. Additionally, the seller emphasizes the truck's original parts, including the OEM exhaust and catalytic converter, which may be relevant for buyers looking for authenticity in a classic vehicle.
Negative: While no overtly negative comments were included, the auction context opens the door for potential concerns that could arise during discussions. Still, the lack of critical feedback from buyers or observers suggests that any reservations are not widely expressed in the comments provided.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Cmarion52 (The Seller) expresses excitement over offering the 1987.5 Rolls Royce, highlighting its uniqueness and appeal as a standout vehicle that is rarely seen on the roads. Commenting on the condition, @Cmarion52 notes that both the electrical items and the dashboard are in great shape, reassuring potential buyers about the care the car has received. @GRiehl admires the car, admitting to a desire for it despite not needing it, showcasing a sense of admiration from the community.
Neutral: @rfgiersch and @Jspringmaniv inquire about specific aspects of the vehicle, with @rfgiersch requesting driving and cold start videos for a better understanding of the car's performance, while @Jspringmaniv questions the presence of bubbles in the window glass regarding potential delamination and visibility. @Cmarion52 responds positively to these inquiries, detailing the car's history of being well-cared for and suggesting that high mileage can often be a sign of fewer issues compared to low mileage vehicles.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's functionality, notably by @Ramenator and @F117driver who want to ensure all electrical components work and inquire about any oil or transmission leaks. @Cmarion52 assures that there have been no leaks noticed and that all electrical items are functioning, yet the inquiries reflect some apprehension from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's operational condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Euro_Classica (The Seller) describes the 1999 996 coupe as a fantastic car with an exceptional analog feel from the steering to the throttle to the shifter. Commenters like @faugrad10 express love for the early 996s, while @Segura911 highlights the vehicle's classy appearance and describes early builds as sweet cars. Enthusiasts like @bmdaia rave about the early 996's driving experience, calling it the most analog, telepathic water-cooled sports car, conveying a unique connection between car and driver. @shiftless shares his excitement for his early build and appreciates the aesthetic and performance advantages of the original wheels.
Neutral: Commenters are curious about specific details such as the build date and various mechanical aspects of the car. @Lesr3204 asks about the cam deviations at the car's mileage and whether it’s a 6/98 or 4/98 model, while @Giacomo65 inquires about the replacement of IMS bearings. @Rdb3035 seeks documentation regarding major maintenance details and the reason for the desirability of early builds. @MCPorsche987 expresses interest in video documentation of the vehicle to better assess its condition, demonstrating that potential buyers are actively engaged in the auction process and want thorough information before bidding.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the condition of the vehicle's paint and tires. @faugrad10 suggests that there may be signs of a repaint based on observed over-spray and paint quality, while @Amirite questions the tire models and tread patterns presented in the photos. @M117.961 points out the lack of a limited-slip differential, clarifying a specific detail that could impact performance expectations. Additionally, there's a discussion on the potential fragility of the motor, which @bmdaia acknowledges as a function of the car's design - suggesting that these factors might concern buyers about the long-term reliability of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @NateFox highlighted the presence of a Scots steering stabilizer as a nice aftermarket upgrade that enhances the bike's performance. @magwire praised the CBR900RR, expressing admiration for its design and characteristics. @01996tt reflected positively on the bike's condition, stating it looks fantastic and reminiscing about their own experience with a CBR900RR, further indicating that the bike is sought after and appreciated among enthusiasts.
Neutral: The Seller, @WarrensBikes, engaged with inquiries about specific details regarding the bike's condition and features. They clarified that the ding in the gas tank is visible in the video but difficult to photograph and confirmed that the tires are in good condition but could not provide exact date codes. The Seller also mentioned that the current configuration includes a gunfighter rear seat, but the passenger footpegs are included, and acknowledged questions about the stock exhaust canister and vintage ownership.
Negative: @trailerjoe raised concerns and sought clarification on the presence of a 'ding' in the gas tank and the reasons behind the bike's low mileage, questioning whether it was a good reason to sell. @beetlejuice117 and @Mimi911 inquired about the absence of the factory exhaust and passenger footpegs, highlighting potential limitations of the bike. Furthermore, @trailerjoe pointed out that the seller should verify the tire date codes to avoid any potential miscommunication about their condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the overall positive condition and maintenance of the vehicle, with @NashvilleExotics noting that the car has been well taken care of and runs perfectly. Several commentors, including @ainternetguy and @absolootbs, expressed confidence in the seller's credibility and the vehicle's quality. @NashvilleExotics also emphasizes comprehensive service records and recent work done, including a new clutch with plenty of life left, new tires, and a meticulous approach to vehicle care.
Neutral: There are several inquiries regarding specific features and maintenance history of the vehicle. Commentors such as @L1MTD and @Josephmarq raised questions about the vehicle's limited edition status, clutch performance, and service records. @NashvilleExotics provided clarifications about the car's specifications, the limited edition details, and reassured bidders about the vehicle's overall mechanical condition and service history, which includes detailed information in the Carfax report.
Negative: Concerns were raised by commentors such as @mirthrander and @absolootbs, questioning the authenticity of the limited edition status and missing Maserati emblems. Some expressed doubts about the reliability of the clutch wear measurements provided and the potential implications of a history of clutch replacements at low mileage, with @jwmunson also questioning the original clutch change at under 11,000 miles. Additionally, @1skindog pointed out the lien on the vehicle, prompting discussions about title release conditions and buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Jeffro_D_1975 praises the vehicle as beautiful, expressing admiration for its aesthetics. @Trucker65 echoes this sentiment, stating that it is a "head turner" and has made him consider a second look at the listing. Overall, sellers like @jeffsnook emphasize the comprehensive inspection process and the stunning showroom condition of the Willys Jeepster, highlighting the efforts of the previous owner in its restoration and the extensive detail given to potential buyers through videos and photos.
Neutral: @MikeBueg seeks additional information regarding the restoration age and condition of the tires, to which @jeffsnook responds with details about the restoration from the 1990s and confirms the tires were new in 2022. @martybrin inquires about nicks, scratches, and fluid leaks, and @jeffsnook assures that while there are no significant nicks, there are paint cracks and some minor leaks, but nothing concerning given the overall condition of the vehicle. The seller also provides insights into the vehicle's driving characteristics, mentioning the absence of power steering and brakes but clarifying their manageability.
Negative: Concerns arise from @graysail, who points out an error regarding the engine type, which @jeffsnook later clarifies. @MikeBueg questions the presence of paint blemishes that may need correction, indicating potential dissatisfaction with the finish quality. @martybrin's inquiries about leaks suggest a level of caution regarding the vehicle's overall reliability, as the seller admits to some leaks existing but maintains that the Jeepster is in a beautifully restored state.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @gdspc commented on the car's low mileage and beautiful color, describing it as incredible in natural light. @bhhumphrey expressed that the Mazda Miata is practically new and praised the PRHT model for its design, noting that driving it as an automatic is enjoyable even in traffic. @trailerjoe shared a sentiment that despite the preference for a manual transmission, the automatic version can still provide a fun driving experience with its manual mode, highlighting the car's overall enjoyment.
Neutral: @aSingh39 (The Seller) provided insights about the car's history, stating it belonged to an elderly couple and was sparingly driven, lending to its 'like new' condition. @Scarlet65 inquired about the car's history, while @mlowengrub and @poppop2016 sought clarifications on tires and the condition of the paintwork, with @aSingh39 confirming the tires were original and describing minor scratches on the rear bumper. @michaelby asked about odors in the vehicle, to which @aSingh39 assured that it was odor-free, fulfilling various buyer concerns about the car's maintenance and condition.
Negative: @tomtr6 and @Wire_Paladin voiced disappointment regarding the vehicle being an automatic, indicating a preference for a manual transmission. @kjrcace mentioned that while the automatic has its strengths, downshifting can be problematic, citing it as a downside in timing during driving maneuvers. @2nd2none requested more details about the scratches on the rear bumper and whether they could be buffed out. Overall, there is a sentiment among some users that the automatic may detract from the traditional sporting experience associated with the Miata.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters are enthusiastic about the Custom Roadster Hot Rod, with @Highlander63 appreciating its vintage 1950s hot rodding style and WWII fighter plane retro look. @jeffward25 expresses excitement at the prospect of owning a fun and well-built vehicle, while @StevieP wholeheartedly praises the car and gives kudos to the builders. @shbjackson humorously shares a personal anecdote about seeking approval from his spouse, finding the car an ideal candidate for a spontaneous purchase.
Neutral: The seller, @SullivanAutoHouse, engages with commenters, addressing questions and concerns about the vehicle. When @Mgrescueguy and @57charlie point out the flex fan being improperly installed, the seller acknowledges the mistake and assures they will correct it. @IbidUpay raises questions about the radiator's tilt, to which the seller responds by mentioning aesthetic considerations and noting that the pitch appears to be primarily for looks rather than functional benefits.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about the vehicle's safety features, particularly by @Denniec, who questions the roll hoops' effectiveness in a rollover situation. Commenter @Grambo expresses surprise at the low mileage of 89 miles over 7 years, suggesting that the car may not have been used much despite asserting it garners attention. There are also apprehensions about potential mechanical issues, such as @Chuck6060 expressing concern over the fan installation and @jetdoctor inquiring about the rear brakes and e-brake functionality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have generally expressed admiration for the 1990 Jaguar Sovereign, praising its elegance, condition, and classic features. @Dollycat3 found the car 'absolutely exceptional and gorgeous', while @Sparrownaut noted its dignified beauty, stating that it was more modern and opulent than earlier models. @kkherman deemed it underrated and highlighted its status as the last truly beautiful sedan from Jaguar. Many comments reflected personal connections to the brand, as @Clarkecars shared positive memories of their own Jaguar, emphasizing reliability and comfort.
Neutral: The seller, @TheConsignmentConcierge, has provided detailed descriptions of the vehicle's specifications and features, as well as transparent information regarding its history and condition. They've invited interested bidders to schedule viewings and have offered answers to questions about the car's service history and condition. The detailed listing included assurances about the vehicle's maintenance, detailing, and recent upgrades, such as new tires and suspension work. The seller has also engaged with several inquiries from potential buyers, aiming to maintain clear communication throughout the bidding process.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about potential issues with the car. @kostasd pointed out signs of repainting and suggested that rust could be a future problem, expressing caution for buyers. Specific electrical issues were mentioned, such as rear window operations and intermittent cruise control functionality. Additionally, there were inquiries from @bartmynameisbart and others regarding the self-leveling rear suspension, with concerns about its maintenance. Overall, while many shared positive sentiments, there were notable reservations about the vehicle's long-term upkeep and condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its condition and fun driving experience. @zdoctor highlighted the rarity of the Reatta red on grey cloth combination with a manual transmission and noted the car's well-cared-for appearance. Others, such as @Jonesy66 and @Lexoma, expressed excitement over the beautiful aesthetics and shared enthusiasm for this model, emphasizing how the car represents a high point in the Nissan lineup. The seller also received positive feedback, with @Driveforfun23 engaging with potential buyers and expressing appreciation for their interest.
Neutral: Several commenters sought additional information regarding the car's specifications and condition, such as @Gearguy71's request for more pictures and @Scudderite asking about the structural integrity of specific components. @Flbuckeyefan inquired about the A/C system, and @chickmann had questions regarding the steering wheel's condition. @Driveforfun23 provided thorough responses to these inquiries, sharing details about the vehicle's maintenance history and current performance. Community members also reflected on their own experiences with similar vehicles, creating a sense of camaraderie around the shared interest in classic cars.
Negative: There were few negative comments, but some users expressed concern about the vehicle's details. @happyharryspieclub questioned the presence of an analog clock in the car, suggesting it was not typical for that model year. @SlowNRusty humorously noted a potential typo from @zdoctor regarding the quality of reupholstered seats, while @pperros pointed out a potential issue with the clarity of a photograph showing the shock towers. Concern about the vehicle's performance on an extended drive was also raised, with comments highlighting the importance of verifying the car's readiness for long-distance usage.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @nkochary expressed amazement at how well a 6-cylinder engine fits in the vehicle, indicating impressive engineering. @Mcfling simply commented, "Nice!" showing overall positive sentiment. @jordanrc51 praised the car's incredible handling and acceleration, highlighting the joy it brings to both the driver and onlookers. @mick59 appreciated the exhaust note and aesthetic of the wheels, while @nodriveraids commended the attention to detail and performance enhancements in the build. @danexcking shared a positive experience after viewing the car in person, stating it exceeded expectations. @Tambourello noted the vintage appeal of the car without the high costs typically associated with Porsche.
Neutral: Multiple commentators asked for clarification and additional details about the car's specifications and modifications. @Joe_in_NH and @Double-Indemnity asked the seller various questions, including specifics about the engine and the temperature gauge. @Redpbs20 (The Seller) provided detailed answers, explaining how the engine was modified and the current state of the car's mechanical components. The dialogue between sellers and potential buyers indicates a willingness to engage and clarify concerns, leading to a neutral stance among those asking for information.
Negative: @Italia_227 humorously remarked that the car would touch bottom going over a "slice of pastrami," implying potential concerns about ground clearance. @catpat8000 raised doubts regarding temperature management, asking for specifics about how the engine receives cool air; the seller's response did not entirely address their concern. @GTE_HemiSphereMotors's comment about missing decals suggested some dissatisfaction with the car's current appearance, while @MrZ10 jokingly questioned the lack of space for a spare tire, hinting at practical drawbacks in the design.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle's owner, @feedoug, expressed a strong emotional attachment to the car, highlighting their love and daily use of it. This suggests that the vehicle has been well-cared for and holds sentimental value, indicating it may have been reliable and enjoyable to drive. Its history as a daily driver may also imply that it is practical for everyday use, appealing to potential buyers who value dependability.
Neutral: Many comments reflect a balanced view of the car, acknowledging its features without expressing strong opinions. Certain aspects like the vehicle's mileage, maintenance history, and any modifications made are discussed in a straightforward manner. While no one seemed to specifically praise or criticize these features extensively, the consensus suggests the car is generally perceived as a decent option worth considering.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle, mentioning potential issues such as wear and tear that come from daily usage, which could indicate the need for future maintenance. Others pointed out that it might not meet the expectations of buyers looking for a pristine model. This highlights the possibility that, while the vehicle may be loved by its current owner, it may require investment in repairs or refurbishment for the next owner.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Lotus38 highlights the vehicle's value, noting that it could be a significant investment, while @Thailand emphasizes its rarity with only 16 models made in 2004. @bogle and other commenters also appreciate the car's stunning beauty and unique features, such as its beautiful interior and quilted stitching exclusive to the Final Edition. @Vtec4ever and @HondaPrelude13 laud the car's design, stating it looks as impressive now as when it first launched, and compliment the pristine condition of the seats.
Neutral: @LettingGo (The Seller) engages with the community, providing important maintenance information and appreciating their interest. The Seller explains the timing of the last service and the conditions of the tires, implying that replacements may be needed soon. Various users ask practical questions about service history and request additional photos, reflecting a desire for clarity among potential buyers. @Mrtiticus shares that maintaining such a vehicle can cost around $4,500, indicating the ongoing investment required for upkeep.
Negative: Despite the celebratory tone, there are concerns regarding the seller's maintenance records as noted by @McGyver23, who questions the lack of recent documentation. @Stepside4x4 raises concerns about the actual color of the interior, stating it appears more grey than silver. Overall, some comments reflect skepticism about the vehicle's maintenance history and condition, with @LettingGo (The Seller) acknowledging minor flaws in the car, such as small damages, which could deter some buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 2018 Mercedes-AMG E63 S Wagon has garnered considerable admiration from commenters, with many highlighting its design and performance capabilities. @JakeTheSnake115 remarked on the vehicle’s impressive appearance, describing it as 'badass,' while @GDogg expressed appreciation for its looks, calling it a 'Good looking E 63 S 4MATIC wagon.' Additionally, @supradrifter noted that the overall design and attributes of the AMG version make it a desirable option for many buyers. A fellow enthusiast, @carcrazydoc, shared that his wife loves their same model, stating its performance and spaciousness are exceptional and that she wishes to keep it forever. Overall, the vehicle is praised for blending supercar performance with everyday utility, and it has a strong following among wagon lovers.
Neutral: Comments from the seller, @p1exotics, engage with potential buyers by providing detailed information about the vehicle's specifications and service history. The seller emphasized transparency and invited inquiries to ensure prospective buyers feel informed. They noted that the car has not been lowered despite previous comments suggesting otherwise and confirmed that it has been well maintained with updates provided on mileage and service made to the brakes. @bringatrailer noted updates to the listing, further contributing to the transparency of the auction process. The seller's efforts to communicate and address questions reflect a proactive approach to building trust with interested bidders.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by commenters regarding specific aspects of the vehicle. @HardEight expressed disappointment about the timing of interior photos, indicating a desire for better presentation, while @Stuts questioned the appearance of red paint on the brake calipers, suggesting possible corrosion. @ripper996 appreciated that the car was being driven and enjoyed but raised cautious questions about the brakes. On the other hand, @Sconniekid advised cleaning the brake rotors to enhance the vehicle's visual appeal before showcasing. @supradrifter mentioned that the lack of a third-row jump seat in the AMG version could deter buyers, especially families, indicating that while the vehicle excels in many areas, there are aspects that some prospective owners might find lacking.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters are generally enthusiastic about the vehicle, expressing admiration for its features and originality. @Brad1187 and @joesketti compliment the car's appeal, with @Tempest65 describing it as a 'sweet' vehicle. The seller, @SanDiegoSteve, emphasizes the car's all-original condition, mentioning that it has an original top, rear window, and interior. The vehicle's rarity is emphasized, as the seller notes that only 1315 were built, adding to its desirability among collectors.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and viewing arrangements. @Gurkneeman asks about the location for potential inspection, which @SanDiegoSteve confirms as being in the San Diego area. Although there are discussions about auction dynamics, such as @Nefauto90280's remark regarding low bids and @Tempest65's input on bidding trends, the overall dialogue maintains a moderate tone without strong opinions about the vehicle's pricing or auction status. The seller provides additional details regarding the car's AC functionality and confirms that no leaks are present.
Negative: The discussion includes some concerns that suggest a lack of clarity or uncertainty regarding the vehicle. @chazman questions if everything works properly, specifically inquiring about the AC and the exhaust's originality, indicating a potential apprehension about the car's condition. Another commenter, @MEGTOM2, hints at possible reasons for the low bidding, mentioning TBI, which could imply concerns about the vehicle's credibility or value. Overall, while most comments lean towards positive support, there are critical queries that suggest not all potential buyers are fully convinced.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @stugottz highlighted the car's strong connection to the world of muscle machines, expressing enthusiasm about General Motors' approach to performance. Commenter @MPreston454 shared their positive experiences with the seller, suggesting a consistent reputation for accurately representing vehicles and underscoring the thrill of driving such a powerful car. @E.Murray echoed the sentiments of satisfaction with the CTS-V, sharing personal joy and comfort derived from ownership, and appreciating the vehicle's balance of performance and subtlety.
Neutral: @restoreamusclecar provided clarification regarding the car's salvage title, explaining it resulted from its prior usage in the V-Performance Academy rather than any damage, reinforcing the car's maintained condition. Multiple commenters touched on the car's features, including its aftermarket exhaust mentioned by @BossNate7 and connectivity options referenced by @Crovet, indicating a blend of modern tech integration while retaining classic performance characteristics. There was also discussion around maintenance history, including a single warranty claim that reinforced the vehicle's strong service record.
Negative: @pcchuck expressed skepticism about GM's direction with performance cars, suggesting they strayed too far trying to compete with European brands. @deleted joked about the salvage title, implying skepticism regarding the seller's claim that it serves as validation rather than a red flag. Additionally, comments included concerns about potential depreciation or perceived value due to the salvage title, indicating that while some buyers may overlook these issues, others could view them as significant drawbacks.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg expressed admiration for the F430 Coupe, referring to it as "bellissima" and wishing the seller the best. @TeamMotorsports highlighted the car's impressive specifications, including its low mileage of just 10,500 and extensive service history, which includes nearly $40,000 spent on maintenance and improvements. Several commenters noted the car's stunning black appearance and unique features like carbon fiber accents and ceramic brakes, with @RecoveringAtty stating, "Beautiful Ferrari, be still my beating heart!" and @robz32 noting its "high spec'd" condition.
Neutral: Commenters sought further clarification on the vehicle's condition and history, with @mike_747 suggesting the inclusion of a clutch reading for potential buyers. Some suggested that video presentations focus more on engine sounds rather than the seller's commentary, as highlighted by @forrest89 who requested a driving video without distractions. @TeamMotorsports actively engaged with these inquiries, providing detailed information about service work and the car's features while inviting potential buyers to view it in person.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the extensive service costs associated with the car, specifically @Proper1 commenting on the $39,000 maintenance bill linked to less than 1,000 miles of driving, leading to questions about how the car could have had seven previous owners with such low mileage. @Banerji questioned the car's history, highlighting the unusual ownership pattern, while @Twells10 raised concerns about potential issues with the OEM fuel pumps. Additionally, comments about needing to replace OEM exhaust headers hinted at further future maintenance that might be required, leading to some hesitation among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm and admiration for the vehicle. @Ahgee mentions seeing the truck on Facebook Marketplace and wishes they had purchased it, while @Boombox44 calls it a great rig, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @CHS_Karl appreciates the combination of a 6-cylinder engine with a manual transmission, contrasting it with heavier V8 models. @jimjim notes a desire to own an old pickup like this due to its rarity and unique bed configuration, also describing it as a cool truck.
Neutral: Several users engage in clarification and logistical discussions. @JOBIE1 inquires about the location of the truck in Iowa, to which @Brentjeep responds with the specific location of Nevada, IA. @robwoz requests a video of the truck's startup with the hood open to hear the engine noise better, showing a genuine interest in understanding more about the vehicle's performance.
Negative: There are some interactions that are flagged as non-constructive, notably by @Valkyrja, suggesting that not all comments contribute positively to the conversation. However, @Na7han (The Seller) responds positively to the interest in the truck, thanking commenters and indicating efforts to provide requested information, suggesting a proactive engagement with potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @CarDogThreePedals praises the vehicle's sinister aesthetic and wheel combination, noting its rarity as a red-on-red model. @Dolsey fondly recalls a pristine version of the same car from his youth, highlighting its cruising comfort and DIY repair memories. @BMcD describes it as a survivor and unicorn, appreciating how clean the body and interior are, while @LuckyDawg adds a humorous nod to the 'Lotta Tin from Detroit.'
Neutral: @Danielrunyon (The Seller) provides detailed responses about the vehicle's features, maintenance, and previous restoration work. He indicates that the unusual engine noise mentioned by @SprintMotors is typical for the original A/C compressor, while other comments reflect on the vehicle's history and performance. @1globalleader expresses nostalgia for the car, asking why the seller is parting with it, while @GotItGoinOn reassures potential buyers of the seller's honesty and the car's value.
Negative: @SprintMotors raises concerns about an engine noise, questioning whether it is linked to the A/C compressor, while @GotItGoinOn mentions the dash and rear seat molding as minor negatives, suggesting improvements can be made. @JayKay2430 humorously inquiries about the old Ford dealership sticker, drawing attention to its potential inaccuracy, and @0351antitank asks if it can run on lower octane fuel, indicating some limitations regarding its performance on regular gasoline.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the charm and appeal of the vehicle, affectionately referred to as "Spiffy," with @Bobbity describing it as a "sweet little buggy" and @robertwichert declaring it "VERY Spiffy!" The seller, @paxton4evr, engages warmly with commenters, sharing her fond experiences and expressing gratitude for the love shown towards the car. @vandrako compliments the vehicle's beauty, and @JOHNAM reminisces about owning a similar Mini, adding a personal touch to the conversation. The general enthusiasm for the car's aesthetics and history is evident, with multiple users conveying admiration for its overall vibe and appeal, particularly in its connection to surfing culture.
Neutral: Several comments display curiosity about specific features and details of the vehicle's restoration, with @Mayjer asking about the undercarriage and brakes, while @lovecars inquires about the subframes and functionality of the gauges. @mdcctxrhd seeks information about the roof rack, appreciating the elements that enhance the car's functionality. The seller, @paxton4evr, responds to these inquiries with a willingness to provide further information or photographs, indicating an openness to answer questions about the car's condition and history. While these comments do not express overwhelming excitement, they reflect a thoughtful consideration of the car's specifications and restoration process.
Negative: A few comments raise concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly its mechanical components. @Mayjer and @mirra express doubts about the fuel pump's mounting and paint bubbling, suggesting potential issues that could concern prospective buyers. @Mayjer notes that the bubbling could indicate a brake fluid leak, hinting at a deficiency in the vehicle's maintenance or inspection. Overall, while the comments don't overtly criticize the car, they suggest a need for closer scrutiny, emphasizing the importance of ensuring the vehicle is in good working order before making a purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @digs_aus is excited about the auction, viewing the car as amazing and highlighting the credibility of the sellers. @roverso welcomes participants and appreciates the kind words from @digs_aus. @GV1390 calls the car the best on BaT, describing it as dreamy, while @danielbruce admires the beautiful color and interior, noting the unique headlight configuration that makes it stand out.
Neutral: @roverso provides information about the Abarth badge, explaining that it was used in Japan for marketing purposes. The seller also addresses questions about the car's history, stating they have limited records from Japan but changed the timing belt for safety reasons. Additionally, @kjensen239 suggests this equivalent service to Carfax in Japan and @binangret inquires about the car's reliability for long trips, to which @roverso assures it should handle the journey well.
Negative: @AlfaDave questions the Abarth badge's presence on the vehicle. @Gggt3 expresses doubts about the car's authenticity and identifies discrepancies in parts, suggesting they do not match those from an Evo 1, implying potential issues with the vehicle's pedigree. Other comments hint at a lack of comprehensive maintenance history, and some buyers express concern regarding the car's previous service records.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @stagewex describes the car as exactly as shown in the pictures, highlighting the exceptional quality of the chrome and paint. He commends the owner's pride in ownership, evidenced by the extensive documentation and care given to the vehicle over the years. The overall condition is praised, with @stagewex noting that the car is not just visually appealing but well maintained, making it a great buy for any classic car enthusiast. He suggests updating the top and cockpit cover to further enhance its appeal, but acknowledges that the car is already in outstanding condition.
Neutral: The seller, @AuthenticAuctions, mentions the vehicle has documentation suggesting it has been preserved well over the years, but acknowledges the possibility of past restoration without concrete evidence. There are inquiries about the mileage, which the seller believes to be original based on the owner's statements, while @morganplus8 points out that restoration work might have taken place, as seen in the chassis and fasteners, but this does not detract from its presentment. It is clear that the seller values transparency and is open to discussing the car's history as more information comes to light.
Negative: Concerns are raised by @morganplus8 regarding the vehicle's original mileage, as certain aspects of the restoration indicate it may not be entirely original. The lack of direct evidence of a restoration leaves some doubts among potential buyers. Additionally, the materials used for the top and cockpit cover are noted to be outdated, which could require further investment for future improvements. Overall, while the car is well-received, the question of its true originality and the necessity for minor updates remain points of contention.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Superhawk65 commented on the motorcycle, calling it 'a beauty' and expressing that it is his favorite color, planet blue metallic. This reflects a positive appreciation for the aesthetic appeal of the bike. Overall, the presentation highlights the motorcycle's attractive features, further enhanced by meticulous detailing and refurbishment work credited to the seller, @themotorbikefactory.
Neutral: @themotorbikefactory, the seller, provided an informative overview of the auction process, detailing the transportation arrangements available for buyers within the continental U.S. Additionally, they emphasized the importance of asking questions ahead of time, demonstrating a commitment to a smooth transaction experience. This neutral position focuses on the auction logistics and what buyers can expect regarding service and commitment.
Negative: While no direct negative comments were provided in the discussions, @themotorbikefactory did mention that the motorcycle is sold 'as is', implying that it may require additional service work in the future, a common concern with vintage bikes. Furthermore, inquiries about other motorcycles, such as @Johnnycab's question about the red CB750 and @Ninjadust's question about a different model, indicate that some potential buyers are curious about additional inventory, suggesting there may be limited options available.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the 1959 Corvette Fuelie being sold. @Dwallace68 noted the beauty of the car and shared that he appreciates the car's history and condition, having only put approximately 417 miles on it since acquiring it. Other users such as @Dwallace68 (The Seller) and @C1C2Fan highlighted its impressive NCRS history, while @Caymanorcarrera mentioned the car as an amazing piece of Corvette history. The car's aesthetics received accolades, particularly the color combination and the dog dish hubcaps, which were noted by several commenters as adding to its charm, with @Hoglover even labeling fuel-injected cars as "true beasts" when properly sorted.
Neutral: Several comments raised inquiries about specific features and history of the vehicle. @jonvidar mentioned concerns regarding the matching numbers of the engine and suggested possible deductions in NCRS judging if the engine was replaced, without confirmation from the seller. The dialogue around engine authenticity reflected the community's knowledge and concern for details crucial to Corvette enthusiasts. @Hoglover asked a series of detailed questions about repairs and documentation, seeking clarity about significant aspects of the car's condition and authenticity. @Oakhurst shared previous experiences related to NCRS judging, thereby contributing a technical perspective on the subject.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's authenticity and potential previous damages were evident in some comments. @jonvidar raised questions about the engine replacement and the VIN plate being machine-screwed, which may imply tampering or lack of originality, indicating skepticism about the car's history. @Hoglover emphasized potential issues stemming from previous repairs, asking about the right front damage and ensuring that the vehicle remains structurally sound. The need for documentation supporting repairs and parts authenticity was a recurring theme, reflecting caution among potential buyers about the accuracy of the seller's claims, particularly in regard to the car's judging score that some felt was inconsistent with what they understood about matching numbers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle for its beauty and appeal. @tannerstpierre describes it as 'absolutely beautiful', while @henryturchi expresses that it is a 'dream car'. @wmw21 highlights the quality of the manual transmission, referring to it as one of the best in its class. Additionally, @alexion shares his positive ownership experience, noting that the car is fun to drive and is seen as classic and exotic. Others like @lotusdiva share stories of their interest in the model, which enhances the car's desirability.
Neutral: The seller, @SoFloGator, responds to inquiries about the car's features and history, confirming that both the original radio and seat rails are available. He elaborates on the rebuilt shifter, explaining the maintenance done to ensure smoother gear transitions. Many commenters ask thoughtful questions about the car, such as @brian7470 about the shifter rebuild and @jdmytriw regarding the installation of the OEM spoiler. These neutral comments reflect an active engagement from potential buyers and enthusiasts eager to learn more about the vehicle.
Negative: There are a few concerns mentioned in the comments, particularly around the seller's reason for selling the car, which involves personal circumstances. @Caymanorcarrera questions why the seller had an 18-month hold with added mileage, implying concerns about the car's condition or usability. Furthermore, @gobbledygook raises questions about oil consumption, suggesting a level of uncertainty regarding the car's performance. Overall, these negative comments reflect some skepticism about the sale, but they are outweighed by the positive feedback.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @robertsherry (The Seller) has provided a detailed account of his care for the vehicle, emphasizing its impeccable condition and continuous maintenance. He mentions that he kept the Subaru Baja Turbo garage-kept, used premium gas, and maintained a strict oil change regimen every 3000 miles, all of which indicates a high level of dedication. @TSR90210 also echoes this sentiment, referring to the vehicle as beautiful and pristine, and expresses a sense of nostalgia for the model's discontinuation, reinforcing the value and appeal of this car.
Neutral: Several inquiries have been made regarding the vehicle's specifications and history, such as @AzBBC's question about the head gaskets and @Tetus' request for the bumper-to-bumper measurement. @robertsherry (The Seller) promptly responded to these comments, confirming that the head gaskets were not replaced and providing the length of the vehicle. This exchange demonstrates a willingness to engage with potential buyers, although it focuses more on gathering information than on the emotional aspects of the car's history.
Negative: While @robertsherry (The Seller) attempts to present the vehicle positively, there is a hint of concern about its past incidents raised by @TSR90210, asking if repairs were completed after a mentioned incident. The seller's lack of replacement for the head gaskets may also cause potential buyers to question the vehicle's upkeep and mechanical reliability, which serves as a slight negative note in the overall impression of the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters were impressed by the vehicle's color and overall aesthetic, with @gman111111 raising a question about its status as a hybrid resale. @Araks expressed enthusiasm with a simple, heart-eyed emoji, while @diamondmotorworks highlighted the car's unique color, describing it as gorgeous. Numerous buyers expressed admiration for both the Gulf Blue exterior and the Pasha heritage interior, with @boaboyoz calling it an exhilarating example and @mayorblurps labeling it an absolute dream spec. Overall, the consensus among many commenters was one of excitement and appreciation for the car's design and features.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the vehicle's resale context, particularly @Ngsd101 who doubted that the car was being flipped, suggesting that hybrids might not yet hold significant resale value. Others pointed at the low option list, with @Ngsd101 noting the price was more about heritage features rather than extensive customizations. @StMike pointed out a discrepancy in the odometer information, seeking clarification from @Vivek.ze regarding the vehicle's mileage, which sparked a brief discussion about the displayed information in the auction.
Negative: There were a few less positive remarks, particularly focused on the nature of the auction and the motivations behind it. @lowellperry flagged comments as non-constructive while implying that motivations behind reselling could be seen negatively. @tripleaction referenced past criticism of the car's desirability by saying it was a vehicle "literally no one asked for," implying skepticism about its appeal among traditional enthusiasts. Overall, the negative comments mainly revolved around the constraints of reselling and past criticisms of the model rather than the vehicle itself.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express excitement and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty, design, and engaging driving experience. @jwcunningham65 describes it as a "beauty" and praises its style, while @IMissMySaab compliments its timeless design. @3_pedal_guy fondly recalls their own experience with a similar model, emphasizing its fun driving dynamics and spaciousness. Overall, many see the car as a special model, with @r23of (The Seller) also noting the car's recent mechanical upkeep and general excellent condition, which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about the vehicle's history and condition. @major362000 asks for clarification regarding a noted "minor damage" on the CarFax, prompting @r23of (The Seller) to clarify the mystery surrounding it. @GRatch expresses concerns regarding the lack of repair history, while @gorillajin questions the maintenance checks conducted on the engine. These inquiries reflect genuine interest in the vehicle but highlight the significance of history and documentation for potential buyers.
Negative: There are comments expressing concerns about specific aspects of the vehicle’s condition. @GRatch criticizes the budget tires and notes the potentially lost repair history, and @Bergie1 points out the sagging front bumper that may indicate improper seating or a prior accident. Additionally, @GRatch requests more detailed photographs to better assess the condition of various parts, such as the faded trim and air dam. Collectively, these remarks suggest some hesitations about the vehicle's condition and repairs needed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed their admiration for the Bronco, highlighting its stunning Bahama Blue color and appealing build quality. @Trailboss praised it as 'Excellent, just Excellent!!' while @jsebby and @Kalliparks commented on its great looks and beautiful color combo. @boaboyoz echoed this sentiment, referring to the vehicle as a 'Bahama Blue beauty.' Additionally, @FlyingJackalope appreciated its stock features, citing it as an excellent example of the best year for the Bronco, demonstrating that overall, there is a strong positive sentiment towards the vehicle’s aesthetic qualities and perceived craftsmanship.
Neutral: The seller, @Northshore149, actively engaged with potential buyers, addressing various questions and comments. They noted that this is their first experience with BaT and expressed a willingness to adapt based on feedback, like considering the elimination of the $150 documentation fee. They also provided updates on the Bronco's mechanical condition, mentioning that the wipers and blower motor were being repaired and confirming the power brake system's manual nature. The seller's transparency about the vehicle's condition and ongoing maintenance efforts contributed to a neutral but cautious atmosphere among commenters regarding the overall reliability of the Bronco.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the Bronco's modifications and usability. @Erkel pointed out that a restoration error potentially affected the vehicle’s authenticity regarding gas doors. Questions were raised about the condition of critical components, such as the wiper motor and blower, with @28hunter44 querying the state of the paint and flooring beneath the carpet. @jdavisjr posed concerns about trusting the vehicle for long trips, while @Txcarguy1 sought clarification regarding engine components, hinting at possible underlying issues. Overall, while many admire the Bronco, there are notable reservations about its restoration accuracy and mechanical readiness.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @AZkid praises the vehicle's unbelievable performance and its rare red color, calling it a gorgeous car. @edykauan appreciates the correct year and the amazing color of the car, wishing he was in the market for one. @BigSwole agrees that the car looks outstanding in red, highlighting the appeal of its color.
Neutral: @Mstanfill acknowledges the vehicle's incredible nature but expresses a preference for color options, wishing the yellow calipers were removed and only red or black were available. @911gofast (The Seller) explains that the damage reported in the Carfax was just a replaced windshield due to a small chip and some road rash on the carbon splitter, both of which have been repaired to maintain the car's showroom appearance. @mjbeckford suggests that the brake and rotor replacements do not necessarily mean the car was heavily tracked, as AMGs tend to go through these components quickly.
Negative: @grumpyoldman comments that the vehicle sounds like it was heavily tracked due to multiple pad and rotor replacements. @NIKISUPREME questions the quality of the windshield replacement, asking if it was an original Mercedes-Benz OEM part, insinuating concern about potential use of a generic replacement. @FastFox adds a comment that expresses a wish for the car to have carbon ceramic brakes (CCBs), indicating some dissatisfaction with existing features.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bensherrard1 praised the vehicle's flawless paint and headlights, suggesting it looked as if it had never been exposed to rain. @SellySel noted her positive experience with a similar model, emphasizing the smooth ride and luxurious feel of the GS series. Numerous comments were made regarding the car's low mileage, exceptional condition, and luxury attributes, with @SpeakerPhoneJones particularly highlighting the respect commanded by the 3.5L engine. @Tah0129 enthusiastically described it as a well-cared-for vehicle, ticking all boxes for type, color, and mileage, while @shamo316 echoed sentiments about the car's great appearance and longevity potential. Overall, the vehicle is recognized for its beauty, low use, and luxurious experience.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions about specific vehicle features and historical maintenance, including @imthefranchise asking about bubbles on the windshield, @cardinals64 inquiring about the timing chain replacement at low mileage, and @gocargo questioning the undercar fluids. @Tonybraun pointed out an issue with the radio volume control that had not been confirmed as fixed. @Simplyredspyder and @jsdoc discussed potential concerns such as dashboard issues and previous recall campaigns impacting various components. The seller, @GreaterGator, made efforts to address these inquiries, assuring interested buyers regarding the vehicle's maintenance records and the overall excellent condition of the car.
Negative: A few negative concerns were raised about the vehicle's potential issues, notably by @SpyderMan981 who informed of common problems with the car's brake actuator and air conditioning drain, along with high repair costs if they fail. Further, @cardinals64 expressed surprise at the timing chain replacement at such low mileage, questioning the maintenance history of the vehicle. @Tonybraun's concern about the radio volume control adds to the list of issues potential bidders might worry about. @Simplyredspyder raised additional concerns about sticky dashboard issues based on previous recalls, although the seller disputed the existence of such problems. Overall, the comments reflect a degree of skepticism about the vehicle's history despite its overall positive reviews.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mick59 commented positively about the car, stating that it retains the essence of the Beetle while also showing that a lot of effort has been put into the build. @APLANTEDLEIF appreciated the color combination, mentioning that the modifications, such as the single hinge and widened fenders, contribute to a stylish performance look. @puebla also expressed support with a friendly comment about the vehicle, wishing the seller good luck.
Neutral: Comments like those from @AvionicsTech brought attention to specific details, like the lien amount, wiring issues, and modifications on the car, asking for clarification on various elements. @domthom (The Seller) responded to questions about the lien, cabin heat, and wiring, providing information about the car’s current state and acknowledging requests for additional pictures or videos. Other users, such as @Albyman, mentioned practical concerns regarding the condition and features of the doors, reflecting their interest in the car's functionality.
Negative: Several commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's lien and potential headaches associated with the title transfer, including @RocketScientist1 and @Baldmannick. @SlowNRusty criticized the aesthetic of the black vinyl wrap, suggesting that it detracted from the vehicle's appearance and requested better lighting for photos. @Robmford and @Sdvd1097 expressed skepticism about the seller's situation, questioning the amount owed and the process for clearing the lien.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reveal a strong appreciation for the vehicle's restoration and build quality, with @wildsmi exclaiming a love for the car's mechanics and @McFood admiring its aesthetic appeal with 'go faster' stripes. @Todd_F commends the extent of dedication involved in restoring such a vehicle, highlighting its character over other 'bigger and faster cars.' @Phaeton30 expresses admiration for how this car's build quality surpasses its original factory condition, praising the seller for the impressive restoration effort. The community celebrates the vehicle as a charming piece of history, with @wagoner expressing admiration for the seller's hard work in reviving it and hoping for its successful auction outcome.
Neutral: Comments indicate a shared knowledge and curiosity about the car's history and technical details. @professorgearhead raises questions about the Fiat's position and relevance in the automotive hierarchy of its time, prompting a discussion about its lineage and significance, with @zjawdat providing context about its relation to other Fiat models. Further, @Fiatplus accurately informs the group about the car's market positioning in 1959, detailing how the Granluce was amongst the top offerings. Numerous commenters acknowledge the car's detailed features and modifications, demonstrating an engaging dialogue centered around its mechanics and relevance in automotive history.
Negative: While the overall sentiment leans positive, there are hints of nostalgia and missed opportunities from users like @oldwrench reflecting on lesser conditions compared to their first cars. @Wheels4life expresses concern about availability of replacement parts like fuel senders, which points to potential maintenance issues. These comments underscore the challenges faced by enthusiasts in accessing parts and maintaining vintage cars, highlighting a potential drawback of owning such a unique vehicle. However, the negatives largely focus on concerns rather than explicit dissatisfaction with the car itself.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @LG1971gSX praised the vehicle as a nice looking E46 6-speed, indicating a favorable first impression. @mikeor expressed optimism about the potential of the vehicle, suggesting it could be bought at an attractive price and either flipped or enjoyed for its beauty in spring. @maryparkscars also complimented the car, appreciating its beauty and inquiring about a speed-related alarm which @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) clarified was just a reminder to slow down.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) provided detailed information about the condition of the vehicle regarding the wheels, stating they may not have been the original equipment but are still lovely. The seller also answered inquiries about previous incidents, confirming minor paintwork and discussing maintenance actions taken prior to the sale, such as changing the oil and tires. Furthermore, the seller reassured @Novius that the vehicle has no rust issues, noting a protective coating on the underbody.
Negative: @VTys2k pointed out that the wheels were not standard OEM for a 2004 model, indicating a potential deviation from expected specifications. @Novius raised concerns about the front damage and previous ownership history, which could indicate the car's maintenance or hidden issues. Additionally, @jadanave highlighted a potential problem with the radio screen in the functions video, which @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) acknowledged as a common issue among E46s.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments from enthusiasts highlight the excitement and nostalgia surrounding the vehicle, with @Doorman2001 reminiscing about the joy of owning a similar car and sharing fond memories of racing. @SlowNRusty emphasizes the car's desirability, noting that those who recognize its value can appreciate its true beauty, particularly with the factory Recaros. @EdwoodCA also commends the seller for maintaining such a well-preserved vehicle and expresses appreciation for the unique features that Canadian Shiro cars have, making it a standout in the market.
Neutral: Information shared by @TheZ31Hunter offers valuable insights into the specific features of Canadian Shiro cars compared to their US counterparts, detailing items like the rear parcel shelf and headlight washers. Several commenters, including @Jwaldo, inquire about service records and maintenance history, emphasizing the importance of documentation for potential buyers. @sarahberrisford (The Seller) provides updates on the condition and history of the vehicle, responding to inquiries and concerns from the community.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about the lack of service records, with @Jwaldo and @TheZ31Hunter suggesting ways to locate maintenance history. @alinesteve mentions a previous bad experience, highlighting a potential risk for prospective buyers. Additionally, uncertainty regarding the import process to the USA is raised by @Vpoptean, indicating possible challenges for interested parties outside of Canada.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have been enthusiastic about the vehicle, particularly noting the rarity of a one-owner GNX like this one. @newcarpro expressed excitement about the car, while @boaboyoz praised its inclusion of the original jacket, highlighting its uniqueness. @Z282SLO appreciated the significance of an original-owner example, predicting that this GNX's sale would be a memorable event given its limited history. Additionally, @Kidsixpack and @GC3 acknowledged the car's appeal, considering it a dream car, especially with the history behind it and the relatively low mileage, which several users remarked adds to its desirability.
Neutral: Several users raised questions about the car's background and specifications, contributing to a dialogue about its condition and value. @baghdadguy inquired about the original paperwork, while @MRPRO requested detailed images of specific components, signifying a keen interest in verifying the car’s authenticity. @SCGuy, the seller, provided thoughtful responses clarifying several points, such as the vehicle's actual mileage and the modifications made over its lifespan, including paintwork and a transmission replacement.
Negative: Despite the positive reception, there were concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @KensKars805 pointed out potential paint issues and questionable detailing in the seller's photographs, suggesting that it might not be in ideal condition. @MRPRO echoed these concerns, highlighting the absence of the original transmission and speculating about the quality of the factory paint, which many users criticized, including @CharlesDawson, who noted the lackluster paint jobs typical of the era. @ACRSNK also expressed skepticism about the repainting, citing it as a sign of less-than-perfect original condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express a strong admiration for the Nissan S15, with @Nissanfan19 proclaiming, "This thing is hot!" and @SlowNRusty referring to it as "Top shelf automotive brilliance." Other users like @atomHowlett note its legendary status in the JDM community, calling it a "bucket list JDM legend," while @fabulous71 appreciates its design, stating, "Such a nice car. Perfectly proportioned... Better looking interior than any of the R32-34 Skyline GT-R's." The support extends from both interested bidders and the seller, @FinestVehiclesTraded, who welcomes bids with enthusiasm and shares videos to enhance user engagement.
Neutral: Many comments provide practical insights or inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition. @PTrevi asks for more information about the damage to the center console, while @mav1178 points out concerning details like surface rust and the repainting of the rear subframe. These observations convey a level of scrutiny among potential buyers, signaling their careful consideration of the vehicle. @FlyingCcc shares a nostalgic regret about missing a previous auction opportunity, indicating an awareness of the market value and rarity of the vehicle.
Negative: On the flip side, some comments reflect disappointment with aspects of the car. @mav1178 highlights the extensive surface rust for the mileage, signaling potential concerns about the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @peanutbutterfordogs voices discontent specifically regarding the seats, stating that they prefer OEM seats and suggesting that the current ones do not match the car's aesthetic as well as they should. Overall, the presence of such critiques illustrates a balance of excitement and caution surrounding the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the vehicle for its aesthetic qualities, with @tt53 noting that it looks better as the years pass, while @morgannut calls out the beautiful color. @trailerjoe labels it one of the best iconic sportscars from the British Empire, expressing nostalgia for having owned a similar model in the past. @bachldrs highlights that the car appears well-maintained, suggesting it is a worthy investment as he considers the bids on it could double by auction's end. Comments from @yfsgone (The Seller) convey care for the vehicle, emphasizing its fun nature and unique features like the Mallard Green color offered in 1973, along with a detailed response regarding its condition and working parts.
Neutral: Several commenters seek more information or clarification regarding the vehicle's functionality, such as @Randy_Forbes who inquires about the availability of original parts like the intake manifold and SU HIF carbs. @richski and others ask about tire details and the overdrive system's operational functionality, indicating some discrepancies noted in the posted videos. @Ciaran expresses interest in viewing the vehicle in person, while various users share their own experiences or relate to the car's charm, hinting at a general positive intrigue surrounding the auction without strong bias either way. It's indicated that receiving specific video updates about the overdrive was important to clarify operational doubts, which @yfsgone (The Seller) addressed.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism or concern about the vehicle's performance, especially regarding the overdrive system. @smitty122 and @Tom_R. mention that the tachometer does not show significant change when engaging the overdrive, leading to questioning its functionality. @Cendrick and @Georgemauro discuss potential repair costs for the overdrive, expressing that unresolved issues could affect the bidding price. Furthermore, concerns about missing components like the radiator overflow highlighted by @rdarbin, and inquiries about other modifications such as the non-functional smog pump mentioned by @MGAs, contribute to a cautious sentiment, prompting potential buyers to seek more information and reassurance before bidding.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @traveler_1701 expressed a fondness for the 1982 Honda model, noting it as their favorite among late 70's to early 80's superbikes. @stugottz reminisced about the excitement of visiting motorcycle dealerships during that era and highlighted the quality of Honda bikes. @AusVintageWheels praised the engineering of the 900F, mentioning its smooth engine and success in endurance racing, suggesting that despite not being the fastest, it was a reliable choice. @LFFInc (The Seller) shared updates on the bike's condition and performance, emphasizing the amazing sound of the exhaust and the overall positive impression it left on viewers when they saw the newly uploaded video.
Neutral: Multiple comments by @LFFInc (The Seller) provided clarifications regarding the bike's paint and graphics. @simplife and @V1000RSC20 discussed the accuracy of the bike's model year and its styling, with @V1000RSC20 confirming that the bike indeed carried the 1981 paint scheme. @Babyp highlighted a nostalgic contrast between past and present motorcycle shops, acknowledging the community atmosphere of earlier times. @JohnS3 reflected on their own experience with a Honda 900F, noting some details about the original exhaust and the inclusion of drag pipes. @leftlane11 shared a humorous anecdote about their past ownership of a similar bike, providing a personal touch to the discussion while remaining neutral in sentiment about the bike itself.
Negative: @davidemry raised a concern regarding the condition of the paint, specifically mentioning cracks on the back side of the front fender and inquiring about additional paint damage. @traveler_1701's request for a cold start video reflects an expectation for more engaging content that might bolster the bike's appeal. @Joexray77 pointed out the discrepancy regarding Honda's use of bodywork between model years, implying a possible issue with the bike's authenticity. Concerns about the bike's weight were also mentioned in @leftlane11's account, where they expressed difficulty in handling the motorcycle, which ultimately led to trading it for a lighter bike.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its aesthetic appeal and mechanical condition. @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 highlighted the Acura TL Type S as one of the most attractive vehicles from Acura, featuring elements like a trunklid spoiler and low mileage. @Myoldcut particularly appreciated the outdoor photos, commenting on the effective use of natural lighting. @DVader even remarked that the car appeared worthy of @tysonhugie, indicating high praise. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, also emphasized the vehicle's well-maintained condition, and numerous comments from potential buyers acknowledge the low mileage and rare features of the model, suggesting a strong interest in bidding confidently on the auction.
Neutral: A number of users raised logistical questions and concerns regarding specific aspects of the vehicle. For instance, @KrazYCliffUTix queried about potential bodywork issues near the left rear quarter panel, while @Darkstar0821 sought reassurances about the transmission, expressing interest in a potential cooler retrofit. Discussion also touched on the infotainment system, with @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 confirming that the navigation screen is often prone to issues common in older vehicles but is a manageable fix. The seller responded to queries, confirming the vehicle's history, maintenance work, and lack of significant issues, which helped alleviate some concerns from prospective buyers.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects noted, there were remarks indicating potential pitfalls in the vehicle's condition. @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 mentioned a common issue with the infotainment screen, noting that while a replacement is available, it may not be a plug-and-play solution due to the factory setup. @Darkstar0821 echoed this hesitation, expressing concern about the possible need for substantial repairs to the transmission in the future. Additionally, @Teddytuna raised questions about the functionality of the blower fan, and @zaphanathpaneah inquired about moisture and rust, reinforcing that previous owners may not guarantee a completely trouble-free experience. Overall, while the vehicle has won many admirers, these comments signal caution regarding its older attributes and necessary upkeep.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Acorn19 praised the vehicle as a true American Hero, highlighting its cultural significance. @badboat25, identifying as a Ford dealer, expressed a desire to display the Jeep in their showroom, suggesting its appeal in a commercial setting. @bklmker, who describes themselves as an 'olive drab addict', also expressed a strong desire to own the Jeep simply for its aesthetics, indicating a passionate appreciation for its design.
Neutral: @Ali42_2000, the Seller, provided information about the vehicle's condition and history, indicating that it does not have a machine gun mount plate and affirming that the tub is likely original from California. The Seller mentioned the vehicle's max speed and its limited usability for long-distance driving, advising potential buyers to consider a trailer for transport. @Valkyrja recounted a personal story about a similar vehicle that supposedly had historical significance, though they acknowledged the difficulty in verifying such claims.
Negative: @OldJeepBob noted some visible wiring that appeared older, implying possible maintenance issues. @tartry raised a safety concern about the Jeep's drivability for longer distances, suggesting hesitation about its performance. Additionally, @ammfbsw inquired about the history of the Jeep's tub, hinting at doubts regarding its condition, while @ShedK requested specific images of the frame, indicating concerns over hidden issues that may affect the vehicle's integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg praised the vehicle's appearance, specifically noting how stunning the Light Platinum over Beige color combination looks. @Dollycat3 also commended the Cadillac for being exceptional and @Evmoorenw described it as a 'creampuff Caddy,' indicating enthusiasm for potentially acquiring it. @stugottz shared a personal connection, expressing love for the ride and comfort of their own Cadillac model.
Neutral: Several comments focused on seeking additional information and clarity about the vehicle's specifics. @jbowders requested pictures of various parts of the car, including the trunk and center armrest, while @MsChrys asked about the tire manufacturing date and potential engine leaks. @Jaxautodeals (The Seller) assured that more pictures and videos would be shared and addressed inquiries about the seating condition and the vehicle's features, indicating a positive engagement with potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding cosmetic issues, such as a light scratch on the driver's side door as noted by @Teamsters1, and inquiries about the condition of the seats and carpets by @jbowders, who questioned why they appeared stained despite the vehicle being detailed multiple times. @Nur31 pointed out that the vehicle's low mileage might suggest a hidden story behind its condition, hinting at possible issues or inconsistencies that have surfaced in discussions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the potential of the vehicle, particularly citing its rare parts and good foundational condition. @oneof3K notes that the Scout has critical components like the dash pad, which are significant for a restoration project. @goldd1 (The Seller) enthusiastically states that the Scout has great bones and a well-maintained interior, indicating a solid underpinning for those looking to restore a Red Carpet Special (RCS). @bonesofsteel appreciates the originality of the truck, emphasizing its charm and inherent value.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the verification of the vehicle's RCS status and its incorporation of certain features, such as the red carpet that was confirmed by @goldd1 (The Seller). @IronSwapper inquires about the Line Setting and @Hackberry questions the existence of red carpets in the vehicle. @JimAllen adds historical context about the RCS and explains complexities regarding the vehicle's title and model year that may contribute to confusion regarding its classification. @goldd1 (The Seller) acknowledges and engages with these inquiries, keeping the communication clear and informative.
Negative: A number of concerns are raised about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the quality of the drivers' side floor pan rework mentioned by @oneof3K. @JimAllen provides a critique regarding the originality claims of the vehicle's parts, suggesting that the only way to verify its status is through model prefixes absent from the vehicle itself. There are also doubts expressed regarding some included parts, such as the running lights mentioned by @db31, who clarifies that the lights referenced might not be suitable for Scouts. Lastly, @oneof3K cautions about the non-functionality of certain gauges without proper connections in the wiring harness.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors like @Joey1320 found the vehicle stunning, with @JNaksos calling it one of the mintiest driver examples seen on the platform. @HeritageGruppe, the seller, expressed confidence about the car's quality, emphasizing its solid condition, healthy performance, and fun driving experience. They noted that the only recommended maintenance was replacing the shifter bushings due to minor play, while also assuring that the tires are nearly new, making the car suitable for city driving. Additionally, outdoor photos were shared, showcasing the vehicle's striking appearance, further attracting interest and positive mentions from various users.
Neutral: Several commentors, including @Peter_69 and @Diseasewithnocure, sought further details about the car's mechanical history and any available performance tests. @Libelle mentioned the vehicle's overall condition, comparing it to a 25-year-old car with common flaws but still noted its potential interest in the auction. @HeritageGruppe confirmed that the seller did not have receipts for all repairs, and noted the current owner had maintenance records for only certain components, like the brakes. Commentors also discussed minor technical issues, including non-working gauges and potential fixes, with @HeritageGruppe offering to facilitate inspections and provide necessary suggestions for repairs during the bidding process.
Negative: On the less favorable end, @ThejudgeRoy critiqued the listing's photos, likening them to overly filtered social media images, while @pink raised concerns about an unknown mileage period for the car. @sir_keith pointed out that the vehicle's high mileage and prior paint work might obscure its true quality. Concerns were echoed by @ShelbyAmericanPWR, who remarked on the risks of acquiring a vehicle with many unknowns. @Libelle humorously likened the car to a "tramp in a dinner gown," implying that its flaws left much to be desired, while @Diseasewithnocure questioned the lack of detailed diagnostic measures, expressing doubts about the car's reliability without proper tests.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Cryobrad54 commended the seller's use of project photos, appreciating the depth of work that was put into the car. They described it as a great example of how a vehicle can be transformed into something special. @boaboyoz called it a rambunctious and aesthetically pleasing Road Runner, particularly noting the attractive yellow color. @Kansas01 visited the car in person and described it as straight and well-kept, highlighting the beautiful paint and meticulous engine bay. @Big_Injun praised the car's performance, expressing admiration for its strong and streetable engine.
Neutral: @Mstanfill raised concerns about the dyno results, noting a significant power discrepancy but ultimately recognizing the car's impressive attributes. @alexg182 inquired about the addition of more photos and driving videos, indicating a desire to see more of the completed car. @SoldieroftheLaw addressed the dyno results with a different perspective, explaining variances in dyno readings due to conditions and drivetrain losses, suggesting the numbers presented were acceptable.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism regarding the power loss highlighted by @Mstanfill, who suggested that such a large difference typically shouldn't exist. @Mstanfill admitted to making an error in their calculations after receiving feedback from @Big_Injun. @CalvadaKing warned potential buyers to handle the car cautiously due to the high torque output from the engine, indicating that the rear axle might be under strain.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments for its beautiful classic design and well-maintained condition. @Dollycat3 expressed admiration for its stunning color combination and encouraged enjoying the car after minor fixes. @DKesh noted the character of the car, remarking on the added touch of a rug in the trunk and wishing the seller good fortune. @Rockwhite and @Postermandan shared their love for this model and appreciated its rarity, with the seller also acknowledging its unique history and legacy.
Neutral: Individuals have shown interest in seeing additional visuals and videos of the car to assess its driving condition better. @Culbrz requested videos of the car in motion, while @Rpionke asked for specific pictures of the trunk and undercarriage. @dcpropulsion added insightful comments about the car's transmission characteristics and performance expectations, highlighting the common misconceptions related to transmission shifts, emphasizing the vehicle's nature as a classic with needed understanding for potential new owners.
Negative: There were inquiries regarding the vehicle's functionality and potential concerns. @JKB4 questioned whether the car shifts smoothly, pointing out previous service history claims of transmission issues. Both @CSE and @sancem raised concerns about the absence of detailed images of the car's underside and the lack of clarity about its maintenance history. @HajoSt also inquired about past bodywork and indicated a desire for comprehensive documentation, reflecting some apprehension that potential buyers may share regarding long-term usage.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @AZXB praises the color combination of Kona blue on white, calling it the best for modern Shelbys. @Schuler agrees, stating the vehicle features the best colors and the most comfortable seats.
Neutral: @TNB8 inquires about the touch-up paint on the vehicle's right rear corner, asking @Tahoe14605 for details and close-up images of the imperfections. @Tahoe14605 responds by sharing close-up pictures and explains that the touch-up was his own effort after accidentally hitting a fence, though he admits his skills in touch-up painting may have left the area looking worse than before.
Negative: No negative comments were provided. The discourse largely focuses on the appearance and detailed condition of the vehicle without any outright criticism.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg praised the vehicle, describing it as a "Gorgeous E300" and wished the seller best wishes. @sainswor, the seller, provided a warm introduction about the 2018 E300, noting its remarkable condition due to previous careful ownership. He expressed a mix of sadness and hope in finding someone who appreciates the car as much as his family did, emphasizing its smooth performance, fuel efficiency, and how it stands out in its class due to the AMG sport and Premium packages.
Neutral: The seller responded to inquiries from @vicfey regarding the vehicle's prior listing on AutoTrader. He confirmed that the car listed was indeed the same vehicle, explaining that the original listing was deactivated, and BaT is the only way to purchase it now. @SimonTemplarVA raised questions about potential mechanical issues, service history, and the car's recent high mileage, to which the seller assured that there are no unresolved issues and provided details on the last service, mentioning it hasn't been used much since.
Negative: @SimonTemplarVA's inquiries pointed to the potential concerns buyers might have about the vehicle's past maintenance, including questions about smoking history, mechanical faults, and reasons for the mileage increase. While the seller responded positively to these questions, the initial concern demonstrates a level of apprehension that might exist among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's full history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the aesthetic and performance qualities of the 2019 GT3 Touring. @boaboyoz describes it as a 'beautiful build,' highlighting the Jet Black Metallic color and Guards Red accents as a 'spiffy touch.' @Bruce911 echoes this sentiment, expressing joy in the car being driven, emphasizing the fun that comes with experience, and wishing good luck to bidders and the seller. The enthusiasm is palpable, with several commenters expressing excitement about its auction potential, particularly @Vanillathunder, who believes that the new owner will enjoy it without regret due to its mileage and value.
Neutral: There are quite a few inquiries regarding the specifications and condition of the vehicle. @titans99 asks about the specific panels with paint protection film (PPF) and if additional documentation is available, demonstrating due diligence before bidding. @skillman seeks clarity on the interior details, while @Mike_Medic inquires about a potential scratch visible in the auction photos. The seller, @iLussoOC, is actively responsive, providing further details like the DME report and additional images when prompted, which fosters a positive, informative environment.
Negative: Some comments indicate skepticism about the bid price and the car's marketability. @Dachshund expresses an opinion that the GT3 Touring is underappreciated despite its merits, speculating that its driven status may detract from its value. Similarly, @116610LV estimates a more modest auction outcome based on the car's specifications and mileage, which could influence potential buyers' perceptions. Moreover, concerns about specific cosmetic issues are raised, leaving some uncertainties about the car's condition, such as @Mike_Medic's mention of a scratch on the hood.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Jthronin shared their love for the bike, stating they've had #427. @Al_Loco called the VMax the pinnacle of Yamaha motorcycle technology, noting that it is disgustingly underrated and predicts the new owner will be extremely happy. @Gearhed64 expressed excitement with a simple 'WOW', while @dekoningc (The Seller) highlighted the bike’s heritage and impressive specifications. They noted that it came from an elderly owner who rarely sells, making this particular model a nearly impossible find. Furthermore, they praised its comfort, power, handling, and overall experience, emphasizing that the VMax is gaining appreciation and will satisfy its next owner whether used regularly or displayed. @tmc_61 referred to it as being in a class by itself, while other commenters echoed sentiments about the lack of competition for the VMax. @mtr25 echoed similar feelings, praising both the bike's speed and smoothness, with @Hansjrw suggesting that it could be modified to outperform other high-powered bikes.
Neutral: @LuckyJ2019 inquired whether there might be a low-mileage sister Fazer up for sale, but @dekoningc (The Seller) quickly clarified that there is not. A few commenters shared their respect for the bike’s presence and legacy, with @wood1565 reminiscing about owning a new one back in 1986, and @68C10292 reflecting on the bike's incomparable power and acceleration characteristics. The consensus appears to be that while there are many fast bikes available, the VMax is seen as something entirely distinct in terms of experience, further echoed by @1995Z28LT1 who shared their passion for the VMax and mentioned their own 1989 model.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback, @tmc_61 noted that the VMax 'needs tires', suggesting there is room for improvements or maintenance that the new owner might consider. @68C10292 jokingly remarked on the potential consequences of riding a VMax, warning about the risks of losing a license or even worse, implying that its power could be overwhelming for some. This slight cautionary sentiment hints at the intense riding experience that the VMax offers, which may not be suitable for every rider.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg applauds the car's beauty, describing it as a gorgeous GTC4 Lusso and praising its return to BaT after being thoroughly enjoyed. @ferrarifan10 (The Seller) enthusiastically shares that it is the most practical Ferrari, loved by his wife and twin boys thanks to its driving experience and comfortable back seat. He also offers encouragement to potential buyers, stating that he had no issues during ownership and would fully recommend the car. Other commenters like @Charleetuner and @Finished echo similar sentiments of admiration, highlighting the car's attractiveness and enjoyable ownership experience, with @waffles2 expressing a desire for more comfortable transport for their children.
Neutral: @ferrarifan10 (The Seller) provides detailed information about the vehicle, including its annual maintenance cost of around $2,800 and the comfortable rear seating, which fits adults as well. He also candidly discusses the reason for selling, which is lack of garage space due to his daughter taking one of the spots. Comments from @SCOTTeVESTceo and @Jacob2626 confirm that they haven't faced issues with the vehicle's known V12 with AWD system, suggesting that it is a reliable option. @lionsfan54 humorously remarks on the cost of modifications made to the vehicle and adds a lighthearted note to the discussion, keeping the tone friendly.
Negative: On the downside, @jguadiz raises a concern regarding whether the known issues with the V12 engine and 4RM AWD system have been addressed, while @waffles2 also questions whether these issues have been analyzed. @lionsfan54 mentions dissatisfaction with the high installation cost of a radar system in the past, describing it mockingly as deserving of severe punishment. @ferrarifan10 (The Seller) reassures potential buyers by confirming there are no issues detected with the vehicle after checks with his Ferrari service manager, alleviating some concerns but not eliminating them entirely.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The overall sentiment about the vehicle is overwhelmingly positive, with numerous commenters expressing their admiration for the Dodge Viper SRT-10. @Dodge_guy described the car as 'absolutely stunning,' while @Jensf1 echoed the sentiment, finding the vehicle 'SO cool.' @zviper1 showcased their enthusiasm with their collection of GEN 4 Vipers, suggesting the car holds significant appeal among fans of the model. @redtanrt10 praised the unique color combination and inquired about performance features, discussing the car's rarity with specific mentions of its K&N intake. Commenters like @BPL76 called it one of the most beautiful Vipers they had ever seen, affirming its status in the community.
Neutral: Some comments offered neutral observations or questions regarding the vehicle's history and specifications. @markno inquired about the amount of track time the Viper has seen, suggesting a desire for more information on its usage. @jfkauto also asked the same question, reflecting common curiosity among potential buyers. @C3Lee mentioned that the Viper holds impressive records at various tracks, providing informative insight into the car's performance capabilities. There were questions about the OEM parts and modifications, with @meandmyredferrari and @Ztnedman1 seeking clarity on whether the original parts were included in the sale, highlighting common buyer considerations.
Negative: On the downside, there were a few concerns raised about the vehicle's condition and modifications. @meandmyredferrari pointed out potential imperfections on the dashboard, indicating a need for transparency regarding the car's aesthetic state. Additionally, there was a mention by @ohiolion regarding the stock radio, labeling the OEM radio as inadequate based on their experience with a similar model. @RyderGross questioned an item visible in an image, which raised concerns about modifications that may not have been disclosed. These comments reflect underlying skepticism or a cautious approach by potential buyers as they consider their interest in the car.
![]() |
BC20LAR
Lot 220551
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Commentators have expressed admiration for the aesthetics and upgrades of the vehicle, highlighting it as a beautiful and rare example of a 1960 Bentley S2 Continental. @Dollycat3 and @ChicagoGas both appreciated its unique Mulliner design, calling it exceptional and noting that it stands out among classic cars. The quality of the workmanship in the car's modifications has also been praised, with many, including @Luz_do_sol, noting that the integration of the GM 6.0-liter LQ4 V8 and the four-speed 4L65E automatic transmission is not only necessary for improved reliability but has been executed with exceptional attention to detail, enhancing the overall driving experience.
Neutral: Several comments reflected a mixed viewpoint regarding the vehicle's engine swap, acknowledging the original engine's historical significance while recognizing the practical improvements offered by the modern engine. @johnjm and @ZaynCohan expressed curiosity about the challenges of maintaining the original powertrain, while others noted that the vehicle is designed for modern driving. @Whizzard2 and @mercmanfrank raised questions about the integration of the new transmission with the existing braking system, indicating a shared interest in understanding how the modifications were accomplished, which appears to be well thought out, according to comments from @RR1963 (The Seller). Overall, there seems to be an appreciation for the craftsmanship involved in the car's upgrades, despite some reservations about the loss of originality.
Negative: However, not all feedback was positive. Some commenters expressed disappointment with the removal of the original engine, believing it diminishes the car's historical value. @1996MBZ and @Sunoco260 voiced concerns regarding how this change could affect resale value and the essence of the classic automotive experience. @porkpiehat noted that while the car is more enjoyable to drive with the new engine, it could lack value compared to a fully original model. Additionally, @HHClark raised a concern about potential steering issues based on video observations, which might suggest underlying mechanical challenges. These comments reflect a tension between maintaining classic authenticity versus enhancing modern usability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Strain1705 highlights the vehicle as a 'GEM', showcasing the appeal and desirability of the bike, while @Jebinic expresses excitement about its good looks, indicating a positive aesthetic impression. @magwire shares enthusiasm about the bike being listed again, noting it as 'gorgeous' and expressing a desire to follow its progress, emphasizing its visual allure. Furthermore, @Ben_Drinking_Coffee reminisces fondly about past experiences on a similar bike, showcasing a strong emotional connection and positive memories associated with riding a Ducati, suggesting the bike evokes strong nostalgia and satisfaction for potential buyers.
Neutral: @j_mccausland inquires about the possibility of converting the bike back to street legal, reflecting a practical consideration and interest in its usability. @Jacksonphil (The Seller) responds affirmatively, indicating that while all necessary parts for conversion are included, some additional bolts might be needed, thus providing potential buyers with clarity on the bike's adaptability and reassuring them about its condition. This exchange indicates practicality and the seller's willingness to assist interested buyers, fostering a neutral but informative dialogue about the vehicle's features.
Negative: While the comments primarily express positive sentiments, @Strain1705 mentions a 'deadbeat buyer' in a somewhat negative context, potentially reflecting on previous experiences during the sale. However, this comment is more of a reflection on past sales dynamics rather than a direct criticism of the vehicle itself. There is a lack of outright negative comments regarding the bike's condition or performance, suggesting overall satisfaction among the commentators.
![]() |
2,700-Mile Supercharged 2013 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sahara w/Trailer
1C4HJWEG2DL547719
Lot 220546
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Commentors have expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle and trailer setup. @stugottz highlighted the excitement of arriving at a party with such an impressive rig. @SndManStv appreciated the vehicle's low mileage and vintage appeal, noting it was nice-looking for being 12 years old. @SOSLLC1 expressed a strong desire to own the setup, indicating high interest and demand for this unique vehicle.
Neutral: @piros1 inquired about specific dimensions of the trailer, wanting to ensure it meets their needs. @carchel (The Seller) provided detailed specifications about the trailer's features, including measurements and components. @trophymotors responded to another inquiry about the interior dimensions of the trailer, offering precise measurements to help potential buyers understand the trailer's capacity.
Negative: While there were many positive remarks, @GaryRoach raised concerns about the vehicle's fuel efficiency, querying its single-digit miles per gallon. @carchel (The Seller) responded to this by mentioning that the vehicle had not been driven extensively, leading to an average of 13.1 MPG, and suggested that it could be better on longer journeys. @piros1 also expressed that the length may be a concern for their plans, indicating that potential buyers might find the size of the setup a limiting factor.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg described the car as an "absolutely magnificent opportunity for the winning bidder" and expressed hope that it will remain in their collection for a long time. @boaboyoz praised the car as being "very, very cool" and complimented its lovely build. Additionally, @amcnew referred to it as a "dream car," showing enthusiasm for the model and its features. @Trimman1979 (The Seller) mentioned the joy of specking out this amazing car and expressed regret to see it go, indicating pride in the vehicle's quality and appeal.
Neutral: @the_car_museum questioned whether the black color is common for this vehicle or simply a coincidence since they have seen two in a row. @GJJRCARS agreed it seemed coincidental, noting that both cars lack the Heritage Design Package. @lowellperry commented on the car's beauty but admitted to being more interested in seeing more photos of the house and motor court, highlighting a slight distraction from the vehicle itself.
Negative: There are no overtly negative comments about the vehicle in the provided comments. The general tone is positive or neutral, indicating appreciation for the car and varying levels of interest among the commentators.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the unique appeal of the Callaway 944, with enthusiasts noting the significance of owning one of the limited conversions. @Spokayman emphasizes that the value lies in its rarity and that it's a great project for a dedicated 944 aficionado. The vehicle has a chance to be a great driver or track star with available restoration parts, as noted by @cdrusn. Several commenters, like @TomT73, express excitement about the potential of restoring this model to preserve its history and performance. @SlowNRusty echoes this sentiment, appreciating the uniqueness of the car and the idea of enjoying it while working on its restoration.
Neutral: Comments indicate that while the car is interesting, it is also a project that requires significant work. @GLTL summarizes that the car has aftermarket features but needs extensive restoration. @jkaesgen (The Seller) confirms that while the Callaway conversion is a significant plus, the vehicle's overall condition is poor and requires time and investment to restore it properly. Some, like @Caleb348, express a willingness to take on the restoration and impressive repairs, estimating the cost in the range of $15k to $20k, acknowledging the condition and necessary tweaks to bring it back to its former glory.
Negative: There are several concerns shared about the vehicle's state, specifically regarding its condition and modifications. @AMX310 expresses dismay about the aftermarket sunroof, stating it detracts from the car's original sleek design. Comments from @944savant and @Caleb348 point out that the car's existing modifications, particularly the sunroof, diminish its collector value. @K10johnson raises questions about potential rust and maintenance issues, including oil leaks and a worrying engine tick that persists even as the engine warms up. Overall, many believe the condition of the vehicle might discourage potential buyers, indicating that there's little demand for such a project, especially with the amount of work needed before it could be considered roadworthy.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @39mercman shared a nostalgic memory of a similar Ford car that his grandmother owned, appreciating the charm of the vehicle and calling it a very nice little car. He wishes the seller good luck with the auction. @Dollycat3 welcomed the vehicle back, referring to it as a sweet beauty, emphasizing its appeal. @Rocky, representing the seller, noted that the car starts cold just fine and commented on its good battery, adding to the positivity surrounding its mechanical condition.
Neutral: @Collins4A pointed out an issue with the prior auction link only leading back to the current auction, which could be an important detail for potential bidders. @rightsaidfred highlighted that the VIN plate concern raised by @Fak10 might not be problematic in California, as the DMV staff may lack thorough knowledge about such details. @Ranchero65 suggested that the seller post a clearer picture of the VIN on the inner fender to ensure transparency and trust with buyers.
Negative: @Fak10 expressed concern about the VIN plate appearing to have been removed and reattached with flat head screws, suggesting this could lead to complications with the DMV. @gocorcoran criticized the lack of cold start and driving videos, implying that this absence could negatively impact the bidding process, raising questions about the car's current condition. Overall, there are concerns regarding the vehicle's documentation and marketing effectiveness that could deter some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @BMWE90Guy praises the vehicle as the best 3 series chassis ever, citing its great build quality and reliability with the N52 engine, along with impressive driving dynamics. He emphasizes that proper maintenance can help the car last for another 200k miles. @VantageAuto (The Seller) agrees, highlighting improvements over the previous generation and emphasizing that the car is a reliable and enjoyable driving experience in any weather. @Mike11357 expresses his satisfaction with his 2006 330i, calling it the best car he's ever owned due to its indestructible frame, amazing road manners, and silent cabin, especially appreciating the manual transmission.
Neutral: Several commenters have inquired about the vehicle's maintenance records and specific repairs. @nmfp77 asks if the original control arms have been replaced, while @hasopi requests information on common repairs like gaskets that may have been performed. @DrCappuccino raises concerns about potential steering lock issues and requests a cold start video, showing an interest in understanding the car's current condition better. @agtrneu2 asks for a dashboard picture to assess available warning lights and comments on potential inconsistencies in the wheel well construction, indicating a desire for clearer visual confirmation.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the reliability of the vehicle in terms of previous steering lock issues as indicated by @DrCappuccino, who noted the absence of records for a repair recommendation. @bmarlinm questioned the functionality of the radio display and the TPMS based on the provided photos. @agtrneu2 also pointed out discrepancies in the photos regarding the passenger and driver wheel wells, searching for explanations about their different conditions. These comments reflect some uncertainty among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's overall history and maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed a lot of positivity towards the vehicle, with many highlighting its enjoyable driving experience and reliability. @Craven complimented the vehicle's handling, noting it compared favorably to older models, while @FiveOBill shared their positive experiences from owning similar models. Additionally, @Paul6200 pointed out the back seat space, suggesting it offers a fun ride, and @Santi97 (The Seller) echoed that this model represents a peak era for Chrysler, attracting attention to its overall quality and performance.
Neutral: There were some neutral inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifics. @Lauhoffm requested a cold start video and asked about the brakes and potential leaks, showing a genuine interest without any clear bias. @Jonfrancis raised questions about a possible chip in the windshield and the functionality of a video, indicating a desire for more information. @DropTopGuy sought clarification on the selling timeline and potential concerns related to previous weather conditions, while also inquiring about the options for picking up the vehicle after it is won at auction.
Negative: On the more critical side, @cmc300m commented on the condition of the underbody, suggesting that it appeared dirty for a low-mileage vehicle. This prompted @Santi97 (The Seller) to respond that it had gotten dirty due to recent weather conditions and that an in-depth cleaning would be necessary. Additionally, @Kingbring questioned the absence of detailed service records, hinting at possible transparency issues regarding the vehicle's history. Overall, while concerns were addressed, there was a clear unease among some potential buyers about the vehicle's maintenance and cleanliness.
![]() |
Supercharged LS1-Powered 1955 Chevrolet Bel Air 2-Door Hardtop 6-Speed
VC55N009609
Lot 220554
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the overall beauty and craftsmanship of the 1955 Chevrolet Bel Air, noting it as a stunning example of a well-executed build. @ssterry and @Chamba highlighted the potential for customization, suggesting that the right wheels and a lift could enhance its appeal. @Scottmikolay expressed admiration for the interior, engine, and the technical details of the project, calling it a 'once-in-a-lifetime machine.' Similarly, @Magic_1 remarked on the impressive blend of classic style and modern comfort, emphasizing the car's exquisite finishes and innovative features.
Neutral: The seller, @1600veloce, actively engaged with potential buyers, offering detailed information about the vehicle and inviting questions. Comments varied, with some users seeking clarification on specific features, such as the tablet control system and mechanical aspects of the build. Several users, including @ernhart333 and @Mauricep, raised concerns regarding the car's underside quality, while expressing an overall appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and craftsmanship. Additionally, @bminter pointed out the presence of many new users expressing overwhelming enthusiasm for the car, suggesting a potential issue with comment authenticity.
Negative: Concerns emerged about the vehicle's construction quality, particularly regarding the underside and overall functionality of the tablet controls. @C10HQ and @92typhoon noted issues like scraping on the transmission case, while @ernhart333 pointed out the unconventional reliance on electronic controls instead of manual options, fearing potential safety issues. @krennpowersports expressed frustration over the seller's vague responses to specific inquiries, arguing that it felt dismissive. Overall, some commenters like @bminter questioned the legitimacy of the bidding and the influx of new users commenting positively about the car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed strong appreciation for the vehicle's condition, noting its cleanliness and originality. @newcarpro highlighted that the van is like new with a long life ahead, while @McFood reminisced about their previous Odyssey, praising it as the best all-purpose vehicle they've owned. @Ultimate_Combination emphasized the potential for high auction interest, noting its desirability, and @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 lamented the decline of Odysseys in general, showcasing affection for the model and its historical significance in American family life.
Neutral: Several commenters raised maintenance-related questions, notably regarding the last timing belt replacement, tire age, and service records. @crxb inquired specifically about the last timing belt change and the status of the tires, with responses from @dna.autowholesale clarifying that the tires are original and in good shape, but may need replacement for driving. Additionally, @Uby67vw1958 asked about oil change records and coolant condition, to which @dna.autowholesale confirmed that only recall service records were available but stated that all fluids appeared fresh.
Negative: Some comments expressed concerns regarding certain potential issues with the vehicle. @1940FordCOE pointed out the oddity of the tires being older than the van, indicating that the timing belt might also be original and should be changed to avoid engine damage. @2002WS6 shared experiences of transmission problems with Honda V6 models, suggesting that the automatic transmission could be a weak point. Overall, while the vehicle garnered much praise, these negative notes suggest caution regarding its maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @robertwichert expressed their admiration for the "unsplit window" C2 Corvettes and indicated interest in the auction, while @Coffeeis4Closers (The Seller) elaborated on their favorite model year, 1965, praising its authentic design features and performance advancements. @Gmmuscleusa noted that the larger wheels fit well with the car's aesthetic, enhancing its look while also improving performance compared to the original tires. The Seller supported this by highlighting the rarity of the wheel option and the benefits of modern performance tires, making the car ride better than its predecessors.
Neutral: Several comments inquired about the functionality of the headlights, with @19sleepy65 emphasizing the need for operational videos. @Coffeeis4Closers (The Seller) responded positively, explaining the headlights function perfectly and agreed to provide proof with a video, showcasing their commitment to transparency. The Seller also detailed the history of the car's restoration, including past minor damages and repairs, to assure potential buyers of its condition.
Negative: @Farfegnugin criticized the choice of wheel size as a miss on an otherwise well-finished car, reflecting a sentiment that may reflect a preference for maintaining the original aesthetic of classic C2s. @JohnF1966 mentioned that larger wheels can overpower the classic lines of the vehicle and suggested they might appear out of place. In contrast, @willie2323 shared a nostalgic view on past perceptions of the C2 model and hinted at the frustrations surrounding the original model’s design, implying that the aesthetic choices should consider the historical context.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @LtED9319 praises the vehicle as "clean and green with a beautiful sheen," calling it a "sweet truck." @alh443 expresses interest, noting it is "very nice," while @Shawh shares fond memories of a similar Santana, stating it draws a crowd and that this specific one is extremely nice, wishing good luck to the consigner. Additionally, @gogounou admires the truck's build quality and design, particularly liking the Wolf wheels, and @sensh says it's one of the best Sanatana models available, highlighting its ruggedness and simplicity. Overall, commenters note the aesthetic appeal and fun factor of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters discuss structural aspects and modifications of the Santana. @LTIII raises a question about the positioning of the wheels in relation to the arches, which @FixItAgainTony attributes to a potential leaf spring misalignment. @RustBucketList joins in on this observation, now unable to unsee the placement. @sensh explains that this design characteristic is typical for the Santana 2500 model due to its hybrid design combining aspects of Defender and Series III chassis. There are also discussions regarding performance upgrades, with @GBRBiLL suggesting a turbo diesel could improve road performance and @WAGONBOYTD advising against extensive modifications, advocating for enjoyment of the vehicle as is.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, there are critiques regarding the Santana's performance and design. @LTIII's question about wheel positioning hints at possible concerns about the vehicle's aesthetics, with @WAGONBOYTD remarking that the Santana is considered "slow" in American traffic standards. He suggests it might be better suited as a secondary vehicle for leisurely use rather than for regular urban driving. The issue of parts accessibility and the complexity of the gear setup is also noted, with @WAGONBOYTD warning about the difficulty of sourcing parts for the drivetrain. Overall, while appreciation for the classic vehicle's charm is prevalent, there are clear reservations about its practicality in modern contexts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's performance and appeal as a driving machine. @Phillip_Shaffer reminisced about having owned the model and considered it one of his favorites for its hot rod-like performance, even preferring it over his current S65. @Gryphon12 echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the fun and user-friendly nature of the V12s, noting their impressive sound. Others like @DJWaddell expressed eagerness to bid, describing it as the perfect daily driver, while @Yooooooo simply stated their love for their own car of the same model, highlighting its desirability among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Comments also reflected a mix of curiosity and concern about specific features of the auctioned vehicle. @Thetatebaumercollection raised a question regarding the rear entertainment system, while @Cadigti noted a gap in the fender alignment that sparked a discussion about possible adjustments needed. Additionally, @Gryphon12 responded to inquiries about tire replacements and the car's condition, clarifying that it featured brand new tires, which was initially questioned by @meg288234 who had misinterpreted the tire information. This illustrates a balance of feedback among potential buyers and the seller's effort to clarify details about the car's condition.
Negative: On the other hand, there were some negative remarks regarding specific aspects of the vehicle and the selling process. @georgepehanick dismissed the car as just 'another old black car,' while @meg288234 questioned the truthfulness of the seller about the new tires, asserting inconsistencies based on their understanding of the vehicle's history. Such comments reflect skepticism about the authenticity of the auction and its listings, contrasting sharply with the multitude of positive feedback and further setting up a narrative around buyer trust in the context of high-value car auctions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly emphasizing its aesthetic appeal and color. @GDogg noted that Le Man Blue is still a favorite, while @StaceGhost remarked on how well the car has aged, stating that it still looks gorgeous. Others like @rabbitholepunch mentioned it as a 'handsome example' that one can enjoy without worry, and @BlueBimmers appreciated the maintenance that has been done, hinting at the car being a strong market indicator. Additionally, @austinmichaud (The Seller) received some recognition for the detailed care he has given to the vehicle, including a recent polishing and ceramic coating.
Neutral: Some community members raised questions about the car's history and maintenance. @paprika questioned why the car had only driven about 1000 miles in the last four years, to which @austinmichaud (The Seller) explained that he had stored the vehicle primarily for cosmetic reasons and had only taken it out for special occasions. @matija23 was interested in the age of the tires and inquired about the possibility of viewing the car prior to bidding, showing that potential buyers were keen on thorough assessments. Meanwhile, @Yeezers asked about the original mufflers, and @dumplingsareawesome sought clarification on a recall, indicating an intention to ensure the vehicle's upkeep.
Negative: Concerns were raised by a few commenters about the car's condition and service history. @ripper996 expressed a preference for a different front grill style and inquired about dings and dents present on the bodywork, highlighting some dissatisfaction with specific details. @123LLC mentioned an issue with dead pixels on the dashboard, which was viewed negatively. Additionally, @nickmoon328 asked about the last clutch replacement, pointing to a lack of clear vehicle history. @austinmichaud confirmed that he did not have comprehensive service records, which might leave some potential buyers feeling apprehensive.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning appearance and overall design. @IceBolt07 called it a "gorgeous ’65 GTO! GLWTA", while @DIESELDEE referred to it as "BEAUTIFUL!!! Looks so perfect". @CardiffClassics commended the seller for excellent photos, describing it as the "best looking GTO I’ve seen in years". The color combination of red on red was also praised by @georgepehanick, who noted that you can’t beat it. Additionally, @CAL-DMN and @CarGuyInOc echoed sentiments that 1965 is the best year for GTOs, with @02fanatic appreciating the renovated design and @rabbitholepunch declaring it the best year for the model.
Neutral: Several comments discussed specific aspects of the car, such as the condition and details that require attention. @Tempest65 noted the need for a PHS documentation to affirm its original features, and @BaronVonZeppelin agreed, insisting on its importance for bidding confidence. @Dmc356 (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the tag rivets and clarified that the current condition of the vehicle is reflective of a well-kept driver, rather than a concours restoration. @wannabid55 expressed concern over inconsistent photo representations of the car, prompting @Dmc356 to explain the difference in the pictures and confirm the condition.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the authenticity and details of the GTO. @canponcho pointed out that the seat covers may have been swapped incorrectly, while @gto3deuces suggested it might be a clone without proper PHS documentation, which @BaronVonZeppelin confirmed as a necessity. @honda50 questioned various finishes on the car, implying they might be wrong, and @wannabid55 expressed dissatisfaction with the differing conditions shown in the photos. @PontiacForLife also raised potential issues regarding the power antenna's functionality, demonstrating some skepticism about the vehicle's completeness and original features.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's condition and rarity. @RumbleAuto noted the prophetic nature of the auction considering a recent PCA video highlighting the model. @carrera30reg remarked on the car being "numbers matching" and wished good luck on the auction, while @Mezgerfan praised the car but suggested more detailed photos to attract higher bids. @Caymanorcarrera mentioned the slick appearance of the car and acknowledged its increased value in the vintage Porsche market, indicating a strong interest in its auction outcome.
Neutral: The seller @kkublik1 provided clarifications regarding the car's features and its history. They noted that the car has never had a roll bar installed, addressing a query from @silver63. @Jockr and @182T discussed the challenges of importing the car into the USA under current tariffs and regulations, which @kkublik1 confirmed could complicate the sale. The seller also responded to specific inquiries about the car's features like the headliner color and engine details, displaying a willingness to engage with interested parties and provide the necessary information.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car's limited use, with @ralleyquattro highlighting that it had only accumulated 300 miles in ten years, which some viewed as unfortunate. @oldcanuck pointed out a discrepancy regarding the presence of a roll bar in the photos, suggesting that it might have been used temporarily during restoration. Furthermore, @myblackberry69 sought clarification on why the car had not been driven since August 2020, hinting at anxiety regarding the vehicle's upkeep. These comments imply potential issues with the car's history and current state that may deter some buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the aesthetic and luxurious features of the 1979 Lincoln Mark V. @JaDawgPNW described it as "fantastic" and expressed a desire to own it while stressing the importance of preserving personal relationships. @GDogg mentioned a love for the unique color scheme and its pairing potential with other classic vehicles. @Discobob noted the appealing characteristics of the blue and white design, emphasizing it drives like a "floating boat". Overall, commenters appreciated the car’s vintage charm and status symbol as the "ultimate 'you have arrived' car of the ’70s."
Neutral: The discussion around the vehicle also included clarifications regarding technical specifications, particularly the engine size. @jfd27822 pointed out conflicting information concerning whether the engine was a 460ci or 400ci, leading to contributions from various users who provided insights and corrected one another. @stephenmitsv, the seller, actively engaged by confirming details and clarifying queries about the vehicle’s features and history, which added to a sense of community among the commenters who showed interest in the auction and shared their knowledge.
Negative: However, some negative comments surfaced, primarily centered around concerns relating to the vehicle's condition. @AnnOnymous raised questions about potential discoloration and structural concerns with the vinyl top, as well as functionality issues with the windows and rattling noises when braking. @mmb777e pointed out a visible flaw in the engine compartment, prompting the seller to explain the reasons behind it. Additionally, there was some light-hearted disagreement about the vehicle's status compared to European competitors like the Mercedes-Benz S-Class, with @CarFoolLane questioning its understated luxury appeal in different regions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's stunning color combination of Blue Tour de France over Bordeaux red, with @smb127 mentioning his love for the seats and red steering wheel. @TDF_Blues noted the car's beauty, stating it was what he had been searching for over the past five years and was pleased it went to the right home. @dscotsman highlighted the car's stunning visual appeal and several others, such as @shalizi and @F355oneday, echoed this sentiment by calling it gorgeous and one of the most striking color combinations seen on a Ferrari, respectively.
Neutral: Some comments focused on the conversion from F1 to manual transmission, with @FMSSOCAL and @Stand4x pointing out discrepancies in gauge placements after conversion, suggesting a need for clarity about the conversion process. Questions were raised regarding the car’s service history and maintenance, as seen in queries from @Bluedevils3615 about engine service records and @mmhkus about undercarriage wear. Many acknowledged the car's desirability due to its unique color and conversion but sought further details on its maintenance background and authenticity of the modifications.
Negative: Concerns were voiced over the vehicle's history, with @martystein mentioning previous issues with a junk title that could impact its desirability and resale value. Doubts about the conversion process, specifically whether all OEM parts were used, were raised in comments like those from @RemingtonSR71 and @Bertrand328. Additionally, @Climbernyc noted a potential oversight in the conversion showcasing two oil pressure gauges instead of the expected setup. There was a sense of uncertainty regarding the car's overall history, which led some potential buyers to consider stepping back from bidding.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Craterguard commented on the aesthetics of the vehicle, describing it as a nice-looking Corvette. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) emphasized their commitment to transparency in transactions and highlighted customer satisfaction with a rating of 4.9/5.0 and hundreds of five-star reviews. They have also invested in significant maintenance for the car, including a new clutch and other servicing components, which may assure potential buyers of its quality and reliability.
Neutral: @topduarte raised a question regarding the transmission chatter and sought clarification, while @98WS6 suggested that dark tint would enhance the vehicle's appearance and protect its interior. @manofmanuals noted the rising interest in the ZR-1 models from 1993-1995, which may indicate a market trend beneficial for potential owners. @redhottripper recommended a specific type of oil that might reduce the transmission noise, suggesting a proactive approach for maintenance.
Negative: @PeterBrian expressed skepticism about the vehicle's reported mileage, citing signs of more wear and surface rust, which raised concerns about its true condition. They also questioned the vehicle's history, suggesting it might have been exposed to unfavorable environments, despite pictures showing a well-maintained exterior. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) acknowledged the difficulty in establishing a definitive history and stressed they could not guarantee the absence of past flooding or the accuracy of all records, which might deter some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is being positively regarded by several commenters for its condition and utility. @ShineOn expressed satisfaction with using a 2001 2WD Cherokee as a dependable car for their daughter, noting its lower insurance costs and better gas mileage compared to a 4WD. They also praised the current Jeep's condition, suggesting it could last another 200,000 miles, and responded positively to the seller's reassurances about the car's quality. Other commenters, such as @Darren and @wdcooper, highlighted that many Jeep owners might not actual utilize 4WD functions, reinforcing that the 2WD variant can still be a practical choice.
Neutral: Several commenters made observations about the specifications of the vehicle, particularly concerning the 2WD versus 4WD feature. @coachsoc and @PrimoHarley discussed the lack of clarity in the description regarding the vehicle being 2WD, with @coachsoc mentioning that it was only vaguely noted at the end. @Kram9545 pointed out that the write-up might imply an assumption that all Cherokees are 4WD. @wdcooper noted that the write-ups are usually done by BAT specialists, implying that the seller may not have been directly responsible for the narrative's wording, and suggested that the focus should be more on the vehicle's actual condition.
Negative: On the flip side, there have been criticisms regarding the vehicle's listing and perceived miscommunication about its features. @YELLADOG called attention to the absence of convertible details in the description while raising concerns about assumptions buyers might make. Additionally, @sigdre pointed out a discrepancy in the vehicle's ownership history, as the Carfax indicated it was a one-owner car, while the seller claimed to be the second owner. @TXDesFox questioned the ownership history, leading to clarifications from @BlueJeep, who explained that the difference didn't imply any malicious intent. Furthermore, @jeepers97 inquired about potential rust issues on the drive shaft, which could indicate worries about the vehicle’s maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @sToNeCLoSeR expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its comfort features like massage seats for the driver and front passenger. @LongiMotorsports (The Seller) referred to it as an awesome truck and indicated that it is a beautiful model with a strong service record. @perfectphoto shared positive experiences with their own Range Rover, describing it as a reliable SUV for road trips, which adds to the overall positive sentiment around the vehicle.
Neutral: @LongiMotorsports (The Seller) provided detailed information about the vehicle, including its smog certification status and ongoing efforts to update potential buyers on service records through receipts that will be posted soon. @perfectphoto raised a question concerning the critical maintenance of the timing belt, indicating an interest in confirmed service history despite the absence of certain records on Carfax. Multiple comments show discussions around maintenance and the importance of regular servicing without making definitive claims on vehicle quality.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @perfectphoto regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, particularly about whether essential services, such as timing belt replacement, had been completed. @apbnoca requested evidence of service records for the last 50,000 miles, emphasizing the maintenance requirements of diesel engines to avoid unexpected repairs. @perfectphoto also cautioned potential buyers about the engine's reputation for issues like snapping crankshafts, which could deter some from making a purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @RumbleAuto praised the Evolution X GSR, noting it as a fun car to drive and suggesting that it may even become collectible in the future. This highlights the enjoyment and potential value that the vehicle brings to its owners.
Neutral: @DylBall inquired about the reason for selling the car, showing curiosity about the decision-making process of the seller. Additionally, @DylBall asked why the car was repainted and requested pictures of the dents, indicating a need for more information and clarity regarding the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @Biten5, the seller, mentioned that they were selling the car to fund a purchase of an SUV for their child going to college. They also expressed uncertainty about the repainting of the car and could not provide information regarding the requested pictures of the dents, which may raise concerns about transparency in the transaction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed positive sentiments regarding the vehicle's aesthetics and the seller's efforts in restoring it. @bidbat98 remarked on the hard work the seller has put into the car, noting its beauty and the thoroughness of the restoration. The car's engine was also praised by @Na_Kalohe, who mentioned that it sounds great in the driving videos. @Rdb3035 complimented the car's overall appearance and expressed gratitude for the seller's detailed responses about various aspects of the car.
Neutral: Multiple comments addressed the vehicle's history, particularly concerning the salvage title and previous damage reports. @Dietzler (The Seller) explained that the salvage title dates back to when the car had just 36 miles, and there were rust remediation and paint repairs in 2018 due to the natural wear of classic Porsches. @Caymanorcarrera and @carsbilly both pointed out inconsistencies in the documentation and raised questions about the car's past repairs, signaling a need for clarity but not outright negativity.
Negative: There were concerns from several commentators about the lack of documented history regarding significant repairs and a salvage title's implications. @frayes requested clarification on the salvage title story, while @bstone208 and @Rdb3035 noted potential issues with the car, such as the windshield gap that might lead to leaks or wind noise. @Candelblower questioned a knocking sound heard in driving videos, indicating potential mechanical issues that the seller yet to address fully. Overall, these concerns painted a picture of skepticism among some potential buyers.
![]() |
2022 Ford F-250 Shelby Super Baja Super Duty Lariat FX4 Crew Cab 4×4
1FT7W2BN7NEC20201
Lot 220457
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: @Pettyfan43 expresses a strong appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive power, reliability, and the absence of DEF, which adds to the lower service costs. They also suggest enhancing its performance with a Whipple supercharger for an even better driving experience. @HP-Health shares a similar sentiment, stating that their truck drives great and has been a source of much admiration and conversations, mentioning it generates plenty of power for its size. The looks it garners from passersby and fellow truck enthusiasts seem to be a significant plus for them.
Neutral: @ENFIDL admires the truck's aesthetics, particularly noting the attractive grey color and red seat accents, while playfully inquiring about its fuel efficiency. @midnightmotorsports (The Seller) acknowledges the question about fuel consumption and humorously points out the lack of impressive mileage specifics but encourages engagement from potential buyers. They also mention that a driving video is being uploaded to showcase the vehicle's capabilities further. @thewalnut provides some insight into the truck's fuel efficiency, reporting a 12 MPG average over a recent 1368-mile trip, though they admit the mix between city and highway driving is unknown.
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters generally express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic and craftsmanship. @bowtie6772 praises the build as beautiful and well-done, indicating that it should perform well in the market. @MitchHungLynch describes the truck as a masterpiece, affirming its overall quality and appeal. @Lancer13 and others show interest in content like cold start videos and exhaust notes, suggesting an excitement around the truck's performance features and how they will be showcased.
Neutral: The vehicle's history and specifications are discussed among commentators, particularly by @LesJohn who shares nostalgic memories connected to his grandfather’s truck. @JustHef (The Seller) responds to questions about the truck's original color and attributes its previous yellow paint to its past. The conversation also touches on technical aspects, like the tune for the fuel injection system, where @ronlsx inquires about whether it was custom dyno-tuned or running on a self-learn tune.
Negative: There are no major negative comments about the vehicle itself, but @LesJohn reflects on the imperfections of his grandfather’s truck compared to the new model, highlighting a contrast between old and new trucks. The transient mention of past issues with older models may imply a rarity of such troubles in this vehicle, yet it subtly indicates that not all older vehicles have the reliability of the newer builds.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight the advantages of the 2014 Mercedes-Benz E250 BlueTEC, particularly its quality, comfort, and amenities. @GattoVeloce (The Seller) emphasized that this vehicle offers an excellent value for those seeking luxury without the new car price tag, noting features such as a Harman Kardon sound system and commendable fuel efficiency due to its BlueTEC diesel engine. The seller also reassured potential buyers of their availability to answer questions throughout the auction process, fostering an open line of communication.
Neutral: Several commentors, including @MercGuy55, raised questions about the vehicle's maintenance, specifically inquiring about the glow plugs. @GattoVeloce (The Seller) responded that while there's no current indication of glow plug issues, they are willing to facilitate replacement if the winning bidder desires. The seller noted that glow plugs typically fail one at a time and no replacement records are available, but there have been no starting issues despite cold temperatures.
Negative: While there were no overtly negative comments about the vehicle, concerns regarding the glow plugs and lack of records may leave potential bidders cautious. The absence of a documented maintenance history for certain components may deter some buyers who prioritize detailed service records. However, @GattoVeloce (The Seller) attempted to alleviate these worries by stating their readiness to assist with any needed repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Usmotoreum (The Seller) provided detailed responses to inquiries, demonstrating a willingness to engage with potential buyers. Their proactive approach in addressing comments indicates a level of transparency that can build trust. Positive interaction with users can often enhance the buyer's confidence in the product.
Neutral: @Longtimefirsttime requested a driving or operating video, which suggests that while the vehicle's specifications are appealing, potential buyers are seeking additional verification of its performance. This reflects a common expectation among car buyers for multimedia evidence of the vehicle's condition and functionality. @Oldcarguy72 inquired about spot welds and interior trim repairs, which demonstrates a cautious interest focusing on potential areas of concern.
Negative: @Oldcarguy72's comments raise concerns regarding the quality of workmanship, particularly about the spot welds and interior trim repairs. This may imply that the vehicle has not been maintained to the highest standards, which could deter some potential buyers. Such negative feedback, particularly regarding structural integrity and cosmetic repairs, highlights critical areas that could impact the overall perception of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @topduarte praised the vehicle's appearance, noting it as a very nice looking last year C3 with a two-tone interior. @johnnyvett expressed admiration for the 80-82 body style, highlighting the well-done interior and providing constructive criticism about an aftermarket pad being installed incorrectly. @Chefgordiemac complimented the cleanliness of the car while asking for additional pictures of specific areas, indicating a positive impression overall. @Lexoma also showed interest, mentioning they would watch the listing closely.
Neutral: @GearheadDoug raised a clarification question regarding the engine of the vehicle, inquiring whether the carburetor was a replacement or aftermarket addition, indicating some confusion about the listing. @flavettes and @Ektl6900 both asked about the originality of various components, such as the block and the front bumper, implying a need for more transparency. The seller, @ajh1, responded to several queries, adding images to clarify concerns expressed by potential buyers, which showcases a neutral interaction as inquiries were addressed.
Negative: @Ektl6900 noted potential rust issues with the front bumper and questioned the general condition of the headlight buckets, suggesting some areas might be concerning. @Tito1967 requested additional photos of the chassis due to the dark quality of existing pictures, implying dissatisfaction with the current portrayal of the car's condition. Overall, there are hints of wariness regarding the vehicle's maintenance and condition from some commenters.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the excitement surrounding the 2008 Porsche Cayenne Turbo, which features a powerful blend of performance, luxury, and practicality. @Tnbusiness71 from The Seller mentions that the vehicle showcases a stylish Basalt Black Metallic finish and Sand Beige leather upholstery, appealing to potential buyers looking for sophistication on the road. The seller also emphasizes the vehicle's maintenance history, noting that it has original paint and a solid grade of 4C on the Japanese auction sheet, indicating it has been well cared for among its peers.
Neutral: There are detailed discussions about the vehicle's import status and compliance requirements for potential U.S. buyers. @Tnbusiness71 explains that the Cayenne lacks the necessary EPA stickers, meaning it must be federalized before registration in the U.S. This process can be facilitated through a compliance letter from Porsche or via a registered importer, making it crucial for interested bidders to conduct their own research beforehand. This information is crucial for anyone interested in buying the car, especially from the U.S.
Negative: Concerns about the complexities of importing the vehicle are raised by users like @stepanaghek and @amgfanatics, who express uncertainty about tariffs and fees associated with registering the car in the U.S. @Tnbusiness71 responds to these inquiries by reinforcing the potential hassles of the federalization process and advising caution. This indicates that while the car itself may be appealing, logistical challenges might deter some buyers from placing bids.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect an overall positive sentiment about the 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL550 Silver Arrow Launch Edition. @tgperformance (The Seller) provides a warm welcome to potential bidders and ensures that they are available for any inquiries. They announced the release of several videos showcasing the vehicle's functionality, including driving and cold start videos, which adds to buyer confidence. Additionally, @cestradajr expressed admiration for the car's condition, calling it 'Beautiful Silver Arrow'. The seller's proactive communication and the inclusion of detailed vehicle documentation further enhance the positive perception.
Neutral: There are several neutral comments seeking further information about the vehicle. The user @Kzxpilot draws a comparison between the current listing and a previous model, which indicates curiosity but doesn't provide a definitive opinion on the vehicle itself. @codyman1022 asks about a review from Raiti, which hints at an interest in the car’s features but remains objective. Questions from users, such as @Fortunateson regarding video evidence of the ABC suspension and @cestradajr about the availability of service records, reflect the need for more information without expressing a strong bias either way.
Negative: There are a few comments that take on a more skeptical tone. @Fortunateson expresses concern about the lack of evidence regarding the ABC suspension's functionality, indicating a desire for reassurance before making a decision. Furthermore, @cestradajr’s inquiry about service records, paired with the seller's reply that there are none available, could lead to hesitation among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's maintenance history. This lack of documentation could raise concerns about the vehicle's reliability and condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @shopclubsautogroup (The Seller) describes the 1973 Bronco as a vehicle with extensive documented work, including a folder full of invoices, indicating it is ready to drive. @scott4tel expresses enthusiasm by stating that the vehicle is ready to use, while @Icanstillmakecheyenne compliments the Bronco's beauty. @VaultofScottsdale also appreciates the appearance of the Bronco, noting its great look.
Neutral: @Rcwest13 inquires whether the panel can be removed to convert the Bronco into an SUV, to which @shopclubsautogroup (The Seller) confirms that the panel behind the seats is indeed removable. This indicates that the vehicle's design offers some versatility, enhancing its appeal without explicitly stating a preference for or against the feature.
Negative: However, @VaultofScottsdale raises concerns about the presence of rust cancer where the body mounts to the frame, asking for close-up images of those areas to determine whether the issue is cosmetic or requires attention. @shopclubsautogroup (The Seller) acknowledges the inquiry and provides the requested photos, apologizing for the delay caused by being out of the office, but the initial concern about rust suggests potential problems with the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the luxury and comfort features of the Humvee camper conversion. @davehondas2000 described it as 'Luxury at its finest,' and @jaredsalinsky highlighted the vehicle's potential for adventure, noting it allows for deep exploration beyond the capabilities of traditional RVs. Additionally, @dgranfard praised the build quality and the ability to enjoy comforts such as hot food and entertainment while off-roading, emphasizing the vehicle's potential for turning rustic camping into a luxurious experience.
Neutral: The seller, @savagebilt, provided detailed descriptions of the camper's amenities, highlighting features such as its well-equipped kitchen, foam mattresses, and extensive storage options. They clarified misconceptions regarding registration and smog tests, noting the unique challenges for California buyers but reassured that registration is possible, especially through an LLC in Montana. Some users, like @simplexFish and @volterM, commented on the vehicle's configuration and suggested that the 'conversion' label might be stretching the definition, but the appeal of the design nonetheless remains strong.
Negative: Criticism came from users like @RobertBasil, who questioned the effectiveness of the camper conversion by pointing out that it seemed like minimal modifications had been made. Some users labeled their comments as non-constructive, reflecting a divide in opinion about the vehicle's capabilities. @PSFarm raised concerns about the inability to pass a smog test for California buyers, and @mlazarus echoed worries about registration complexities, emphasizing the lack of water and restroom facilities, which might deter potential buyers looking for a fully equipped camper.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @LUX-AUTO (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a smooth and fast ride on the highway, emphasizing the unique experience of driving W12 engines. They affirm that both the interior screens are functioning properly and highlight the car's impressive condition, mentioning it has no dings or dents, with only minor rock chips on the hood. The seller notes it is a clean one-owner Florida car with pristine wheels and a spotless undercarriage, along with a clean accident-free Carfax and good service history.
Neutral: Several commenters express interest in specific vehicle details, with @CSGC inquiring about the exterior condition and asking if there are any issues related to the high-pressure fuel pump. @CSGC's questions prompt @LUX-AUTO (The Seller) to provide reassurance by confirming there are no issues with the pump, and the car has been personally driven a few hundred miles without problems. @etkrakow seeks clarification on the tire date code, which the seller confirms as being consistent across all four tires, indicating they are in decent condition.
Negative: No negative comments about the vehicle have been recorded in the responses. The seller has addressed all inquiries positively and has proactively reassured potential buyers regarding the car's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @grrapport expressed enthusiasm for the striking Hysteria Purple color of the 2025 Corvette Stingray, calling it a 'cool look.' @Noisyboyz also shared their admiration for the color, suggesting that shiny wheels and a light-colored interior could enhance its appeal further. The overall excitement over the car's appearance was a common theme among commenters, indicating a strong appreciation for its unique design.
Neutral: Some comments reflected on specific features of the car. @MooneyPilot pointed out that the competition seats might deter potential buyers, while also noting the absence of the Z51 package, which could be critical for a vehicle intended for track use. @gman111111 agreed with @MooneyPilot about the Z51 and brought up concerns regarding the missing black lug nuts mentioned in the window sticker. @Cale_Yeah raised a question about the pricing of similar models available elsewhere, hinting at potential market dynamics affecting the auction's outcome.
Negative: On the other hand, there were some uncertainties and concerns raised by commenters. @ImJustSayin highlighted confusion regarding the car's features, indicating disappointment that it did not include the optional clear glass or carbon fiber roof. @mgregg inquired about the warranty status and expressed curiosity about the reason for selling the vehicle so soon after purchase. These comments suggest a level of skepticism among potential buyers that could impact their interest in the auction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, with @Anon declaring, "Wow, what a build!" and @Neeciem simply stating it is "stunning! Just Beautiful!!!" @IL_Rod highlighted the amazing paint job and quality stating it looks almost new, indicating a very strong positive perception of both the exterior and overall build quality. @cpelfron added to the acclaim, mentioning that they had alerts set for this particular truck model and praised its exceptional condition, suggesting it is a standout compared to others on the market.
Neutral: The seller, @staytontyacke, provided a thorough overview of the truck's history, detailing its frame-off restoration completed in 2017 and highlighting various specifications and upgrades, including a complete repaint, an engine rebuild and enhancements to the interior. Throughout the comments, there were questions about specific features, such as the final drive ratio and the sunroof's status provided by the seller, indicating a level of engagement from potential buyers. The seller also mentioned having a complete restoration portfolio which adds credibility and value to the vehicle's history.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback, a few concerns were raised. @LongDucDong warned about potential issues regarding the OEM timing chain guides, cautioning that this could be an expensive problem for the new owner. @woodland inquired about possible leaks from the sunroof, although the seller reassured that it does not leak at all. Lastly, @GR8AGN28 pointed out observable cracks in the paint in specific areas of the truck's bed, which could signal minor cosmetic issues despite the otherwise pristine appearance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly noting @rg25's appreciation for its color and wheels. The overall excitement and interest in the vehicle's features were evident, as @rg25 acknowledged the appeal of another Mini from the seller. Additionally, @iakllc (The Seller) reassured potential buyers about the absence of smoke odors, indicating a well-maintained atmosphere within the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters sought more detailed information about the vehicle. @13VT requested full photos of the undercarriage, in line with what is typically expected in similar auctions, while @diggy asked about the condition of the windshield, clutch, and electronic gauges. These inquiries reflected a desire for transparency and thoroughness regarding the car's condition, hinting at the expectations set by the seller's previous postings.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments from the users regarding the vehicle itself. However, questions regarding the supercharger service by @Salazarg and general inquiries about the vehicle's condition imply that potential buyers are cautious and seeking clarity. Such questions could suggest that they have concerns about maintenance, although the responses from @iakllc (The Seller) addressing these points typically alleviated worries.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @smb127 commented on the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, referring to it as a "Great Fig in pale agua!" and hinting at its popularity in social settings, particularly at car shows. @DaveEdwards (The Seller) also highlighted the car's functionality, stating that it starts, runs, and drives great, and that everything works as it should, implying a positive ownership experience.
Neutral: Inquiries regarding the vehicle's mechanical condition were made by @jlmmns and @artyc264, specifically about the timing belt and water pump, reflecting a desire for reassurance despite the low mileage. @VantageAuto expressed that great cars deserve more detail than just 35 pictures, which indicates an interest in obtaining more information about the vehicle's features and condition. @raykosh sought clarification on the import documents upon the car's arrival in the US, emphasizing the value of transparency for potential buyers.
Negative: @jlmmns raised concerns about the luggage rack, indicating that without the necessary straps, it could pose a safety risk at high speeds. Despite @DaveEdwards (The Seller)'s assurance that the rack is secured by bolts, @jlmmns mentioned the initial appearance of straps, which led to questioning the installation quality. Overall, there seemed to be a sentiment of uncertainty about documentation and safety which potential buyers felt needed to be addressed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @daniel.giardullo provides a thorough and friendly introduction to the auction of his 16×7″ and 16×9″ Fuchs Wheels for Porsche 911. He assures potential buyers that he will pack the wheels securely to prevent any damage during shipping, and he mentions using a UPS account for shipping, which offers discounted rates. Additionally, he emphasizes that the wheels will be fully insured and will require a signature upon delivery, giving buyers peace of mind regarding their purchase.
Neutral: @ccollector raises a question regarding the hard-to-read date codes on the wheels, asking for clarification on each set. This indicates a need for further details about the product, suggesting that potential buyers may want more specific information before making a decision. @daniel.giardullo acknowledges the inquiry and confirms that he can see the year '87' stamped on all four wheels, providing the requested information in a helpful manner.
Negative: While @ccollector's comment about the date codes points out a potential issue with the visibility of key information on the wheels, there is no indication of any serious negative remarks regarding the condition or quality of the Fuchs Wheels themselves. As most of the comments revolve around the auction details and shipping, other potential concerns are not explicitly stated, leaving a gap in feedback regarding any major negatives about the product.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the Ural motorcycle, describing it as 'a blast to ride' and noting that it attracts a lot of attention from curious onlookers. @GBRBiLL has highlighted the fun nature of the bike and its sociability, while @kjohannes expressed a desire to own one despite having no prior motorcycle experience. @scotch115 (The Seller) mentioned that the bike looks brand new and is in great condition, emphasizing its desirability for someone who will use it. Overall, the Ural is perceived as a unique and enjoyable riding experience, making it an attractive option for potential buyers.
Neutral: There have been inquiries about the motorcycle's previous ownership and service history, with @Beardog68 asking detailed questions about its background. @Roadmaster raised concerns about emissions compliance, to which @scotch115 provided clarification that the motorcycle is stock and adheres to the standards for a 2022 Ural. The discussion also touched on the bike's cruising speed, with @CobraMD asking about comfortable cruising speeds, and receiving information that it's around 55 mph from the seller.
Negative: Concerns have been expressed regarding the future availability of parts for the Ural motorcycle, particularly in light of the transition to the Ural Neo model and the company's operational challenges. @millig67 questioned whether parts availability would be affected, and @GBRBiLL indicated that while parts supply is a serious issue, the company aims to continue supplying parts for legacy models. Additionally, there is uncertainty about the future of classic Ural production and whether it will return to regular production levels, which some commenters find troubling.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's potential and impressive modifications, such as @Twinpop14 who highlights it as a project that @Dom Toretto would be proud of. @MarkBartlett emphasizes that when completed, the car will be a show stopper and a lot of fun to drive. @Sniper81 believes the car is top notch, with excitement about its future, and @DODGERacer1968 (The Seller) claims it has been engineered for performance, tuned to 1000hp with a capable drivetrain. The lack of reserve on the auction has also created a sense of urgency and excitement, as noted by @Yeti413 and @Funnycarman, indicating that someone will have the chance to take on this substantial project.
Neutral: Several comments touch on the logistics and additional parts needed for the project, such as @Vtbull asking about missing components and whether the engine is wired to run. @Danteets and @nomadci express interest in knowing what extra parts are included in the auction. Meanwhile, some commenters like @Marcher6 and @MoparSS raise questions about the extent of work needed to complete the car, with varying levels of confidence in their understanding of the project. @J3RM points out that this vehicle is not numbers matching, suggesting a shift in focus from restoration to customization.
Negative: However, there are cautionary voices in the discussion as well. @Rwsowd comments on the significant amount of money already invested and the extensive work still needed, potentially exceeding another $100k to complete the project. @Twinpop14 shares concerns about the missing interior parts, pointing to the high costs associated with restoring such vehicles. @Funnycarman notes the issues with the paint quality, suggesting that it might be a candidate for redoing entirely. Overall, while many are excited about the vehicle's potential, there is also recognition of the financial and labor challenges ahead.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @Mike9000ft praising its appearance and asking for engine specs. @Richhooser and @Eclectic_Garage also highlighted the car's beauty, with @Eclectic_Garage specifically mentioning the appealing color and its non-originality. @GrumpyJ appreciated the car's features, while @gebirg noted its impressive performance. Overall, there’s a strong positive sentiment about the car's aesthetic qualities, its rebuild, and engine performance.
Neutral: Several comments focused on seeking information about the vehicle's specifics, such as its engine configuration and mechanical condition. For instance, @kaweka74 inquired about the heating and AC, while @kwalexander and @Crowt had questions regarding the differential and the headlights. The seller, @Fubar1425, provided information regarding the paint job, different components of the vehicle, and plans for certain repairs. Discussion about the car's features seemed to generate interest without strong bias either way, representing a curious engagement from potential buyers.
Negative: Comments highlighting concerns about the vehicle included remarks from @wannabid55, who questioned the installation of the headlights, expressing confusion on how they could be misaligned on such a nice build. @Jaredsalinsky and @Hockster pointed out issues regarding the heater installation and the need for improvements before shipping. Others like @crowt also noted the subpar condition of the headlights. Overall, while the car has many appealing qualities, these concerns about functionality and finish suggest that some potential buyers are hesitant.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments about the 1966 Chevrolet Malibu Chevelle showcase a high level of excitement and admiration from potential bidders and enthusiasts. @ntphelps713 praises the attention to detail in the vehicle's build and expresses regret over not being able to participate in the auction. @Dallasdmytrow appreciates the stylish color combination, calling it amazing, while @Samaharveytv highlights the owner's careful maintenance and considerable investment in the project. Commenters like @66CamaroSS396L78 remark on the sound of the car in the driving videos, indicating a positive perception of its performance. Overall, praise for the meticulous craftsmanship and aesthetics is prevalent throughout the comments.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the technical aspects and ask for more information regarding the vehicle's performance and condition. @lenmann inquires about areas of corrosion mentioned in the seller's description, and @fearnotcb requests last dyno readings. @GriotsMotors (The Seller) responds by providing images and addressing concerns, showcasing transparency in communication. Commenters like @Turbo12R express conditional opinions about the audio quality of the driving videos, suggesting technical discussions rather than purely emotional responses to the build. These neutral comments indicate potential bidders are seeking clarity and additional details before making a decision.
Negative: While reactions to the vehicle are largely positive, there are hints of concern over some issues. @lenmann raises a valid point regarding corrosion, seeking assurance and specifics about the scope, while @rsrlegends questions the effectiveness of the wrapped exhaust. @Mario_Incandenza comments on changes made during the build that differ from the original description provided by Griots Motors, indicating some level of discontent or confusion about the modifications. Overall, these comments suggest that while the car is generally well-received, there are aspects that require further attention or clarification to quell potential concerns from buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @peterx expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as 'the holy grail 5 speed SR5'. @DVader praised the seller for their honest presentation of a great rig, indicating a high level of trust and satisfaction with the listing. @flip2821 also complimented the vehicle, noting it looks to be in great shape, further contributing to the positive perception of the 4Runner.
Neutral: @Karbunk, the seller, noted the need to sell the truck due to personal reasons related to their daughter moving away. They also provided updates on the truck's condition, including passing a new inspection and installing a new muffler. Despite some concerns raised by potential buyers, the seller addressed inquiries about the timing belt and corrosion found on the vehicle, demonstrating a willingness to be transparent.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's condition, including @DUGEEEFRESH04 asking about a new safety inspection and @333nick inquiring about the non-functioning cruise control system. @CDizzness430 requested clearer pictures of the frame rails due to concerns about corrosion, indicating potential issues with the vehicle's structural integrity. The seller responded to these inquiries, but the existence of such concerns may affect buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Espanolie comments that the 993 is great looking in Silver, which he considers one of his favorite colors. @boaboyoz praises the car as a vision of ethereal beauty, indicating its exquisite condition. @mac1951 (The Seller) expresses gratitude towards @boaboyoz for the compliment, highlighting the appreciation for the vehicle's appearance and the effort put into its restoration and maintenance.
Neutral: Several commenters are engaged in a discussion about the car's parts and features. @porscheduke asks @TheBen about sources for an aluminum handbrake, while @G-Dub inquires about the bright blue seatbelts and whether they were original or replaced. @mac1951 (The Seller) responds with detailed information, confirming that the blue seatbelts were installed by him and that all other parts are OEM, reflecting an openness to queries and informative engagement regarding the vehicle's specifics.
Negative: While there are no outright negative comments, @mac1951 (The Seller) shares a personal narrative that conveys a sense of melancholy regarding the sale of the car. He reflects on his connection to the vehicle and the loss of his mechanic neighbor, hinting at the emotional weight behind the decision to sell. His statement, "THE THRILL IS GONE!", denotes a poignant moment in his ownership that may resonate negatively with prospective buyers who value the car's history and the seller's attachment to it.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous comments express admiration for the Maico motorcycle, highlighting its iconic status and the quality of its restoration. @Dvredc5 praised the Maico as one of the closest to 100% all stock restorations he has seen, while @RiffRaff reminisced about the enjoyment they had racing their own Maico model. Enthusiasts like @Babyp and @Capthorod1 described the bike as "awesome" and "very delicious," showcasing a strong appreciation among the motorcycle community for this collectible model. Additionally, @Ducboy23 expressed gratitude to all auction participants, uniting enthusiasts around their shared passion for motorcycles.
Neutral: The discussion around parts availability for the Maico raises some important considerations. @lunchbeast inquired about sourcing parts, to which @Ducboy23 responded with useful suggestions such as online retailers and motorcycle groups on Facebook. The seller further shared that with some effort, it is generally possible to find the needed parts for bike restoration, indicating a supportive community around vintage Maico motorcycles. Overall, the comments reflect an understanding of the challenges but also resources available for maintaining these classic bikes.
Negative: Some comments hint at the difficulties the seller faces in parting with this beloved motorcycle. @Ducboy23 shares an emotional struggle about thinning his collection, indicating a deep connection to the bikes he owns. Additionally, @Dvredc5 recounted a serious injury encountered while racing Maico motorcycles, which adds a somber note to the otherwise enthusiastic discussion, highlighting the risks associated with such powerful machines. This blend of nostalgia, concern, and practicality illustrates the complexities involved in the relationship between riders and their motorcycles.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 1967 Camaro RS is being praised for its well-maintained condition and impressive upgrades. @Jay-Z mentioned that the Hotchkis suspension and 17-inch wheels are expected to enhance the car's handling. @ssterry echoed this sentiment, indicating that Marina Blue is arguably one of the best colors for this model. Enthusiasts are also appreciative of the authentic flat hood and clean look, as highlighted by @Micro912. Additionally, @996jurgenDalglish commended the current owner for being meticulous and detail-oriented in maintaining the vehicle, ensuring that it is presented in a top-notch way for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments reflect curiosity regarding specific details of the Camaro, particularly its tire sizes and suspension components. @Coov inquired about the exact tire dimensions, while @KARPARK (The Seller) provided clarification that the wheels are indeed 17x8 inches with 225/45R17 front and 245/45R17 rear tires. @kaweka74 asked about the presence of heating and air conditioning, to which the seller confirmed heating is included, but there is no air conditioning. The seller also disclosed the driving dynamics of the car, indicating it can comfortably cruise at highway speeds without feeling strained.
Negative: Some discussions brought up minor concerns about the vehicle's alignment and steering. @Ibuild offered a suggestion that adjusting the tie rods could easily correct the steering wheel misalignment, emphasizing that this is a common issue in older cars. @wannabid55 also highlighted that an alignment could resolve the steering issue without any complications. @KARPARK (The Seller) acknowledged the issue but clarified that it is only slightly off, wanting to provide transparency about the vehicle's condition. Despite these minor issues, the general consensus remains positive about the Camaro's overall quality and driving experience.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @jeffward25 expressed excitement over the vehicle, noting it as a supercharged E36 that would be a treat for holidays. They praised its reliability, speed, and iconic color scheme, demonstrating a strong attraction to the car's features. In addition, @MercedesBmw highlighted the car's good condition since being sold, affirming the maintenance and improvements made during their ownership. They offered to answer questions about the vehicle, showcasing a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Neutral: Inquiries were made by several potential buyers including @Kkuty regarding in-person inspections, e-check issues, and additional videos showcasing the vehicle. @asultan87 asked about the reasons for the sale shortly after purchase and requested more visual content. @knowledge sought information on the horsepower, while @ftelibasa raised a question about a sound in the shifting gears video. The seller, @George85, provided transparent answers to these questions, explaining current availability for viewings and clarifying modifications made to the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns arose regarding the vehicle's cosmetic condition, with comments from @ffisher45 and @41Neil pointing out gaps between the hood and grille, suggesting possible misalignment or after-market parts. @Kkuty noted that the front end appeared off and commented on the alignment of the kidney grilles, indicating a lack of confidence in the vehicle's overall appearance. Moreover, @thindart1990 questioned the replacement of the grilles, concerned about the original parts and their fit, indicating potential issues with the car's authenticity and repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments express admiration for the truck's build quality, including @Zpainter praising its nice aesthetics and @Jayzee1 loving the color. @GCEA, The Seller, noted the C10's strong 454 big-block V8 and ease of driving, emphasizing its suitability for daily use with added comforts like air conditioning. @Pettyfan43 highlighted the perfect stance and drivability of the truck, reminiscing about their own C10 and its enjoyment.
Neutral: Some comments focused on logistical inquiries and details about the truck. @longrick asked about the documentation fees, while @73carnut sought information regarding the tires' age. Questions regarding the truck's title location were raised by both @Zpainter and @MattFarley, revealing some confusion which @GCEA clarified, establishing the truck's title as from Florida but indicating that the dealership is located in Mississippi. Additionally, @chesster51 inquired about the gear ratio in the rear differential, showing interest in the performance specifications of the vehicle.
Negative: Not all comments were wholly positive; @Zpainter raised concerns about clarity in the pictures provided, suggesting the need for better-lit images of the truck's frame and exhaust system. He noted the potential issues he perceived, such as wiring protection and visible welding concerns. Additionally, @chesster51 sought details on exhaust clearance for neighborhood speed bumps, indicating worries about practical usability. The mixed feedback reflects a balance of enthusiasm alongside caution regarding certain aspects of the vehicle's presentation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Highlander63 noted the vehicle's appealing appearance, specifically praising its original color, Chevrolet Burnt Orange, and expressing admiration for the classic styling of the Nova. They mentioned their fondness for the model and the three-pedal setup, emphasizing how good-looking the car is in its current condition. They wished luck to the seller in their auction efforts and remarked that the vehicle could look fantastic if restored to its original color.
Neutral: @ramauto provided a detailed account of the car's history, outlining the maintenance and repairs done since acquisition. They mentioned the successful replacement of several key components, ensuring that the vehicle functions well, such as fixed reverse lights and a replaced gas tank. The seller also noted that they have been keeping the car in a garage to maintain its condition and provided insights into the car's specifications and mechanics.
Negative: There were no explicit negative comments from the provided comments. However, @ramauto did mention that the car required some 'TLC' upon purchase, which hints at some underlying issues in its condition that needed addressing. While they documented various repairs, the implication is that the vehicle may not be in perfect shape, as indicated by the past issues like a cracked a/c condenser and functional discrepancies in the rear axle ratio.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @timberframe remarked on the vehicle's classic appeal, stating that older 4X4s like this one are always favorites, implying a sense of nostalgia and admiration. @Landrover66Mantilla (The Seller) noted that the vehicle underwent a thorough restoration, with every aspect—mechanical and structural—carefully addressed by experienced professionals. The seller emphasized that no effort or expense was spared in restoring the vehicle, which has only seen 500 km of use since the restoration.
Neutral: Several comments provided constructive feedback regarding specific features of the vehicle. @GBRBiLL appreciated the vehicle but pointed out that the canvas top was not installed correctly and offered advice on how it should be adjusted to prevent it from inflating while driving. @LittlePieces mentioned the updated safety features like upgraded power-assisted brakes and highlighted some concerns, such as the attachment of three-point seatbelts and the condition of the spot welds after repainting, while also providing suggestions for improved functionality.
Negative: Some concerns were raised that indicate potential issues with the vehicle. @GBRBiLL and @LittlePieces both identified flaws related to the canvas top installation and the aesthetics of the seatbelt mounting. @TJ-Z5 questioned the authenticity of the galvanized areas on the trim pieces, which may imply a lack of trust in the restoration work. Despite the seller's claims of thorough restoration, these comments relay skepticism among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's condition and attention to detail.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is well-received by the community, with @boaboyoz describing it as a "fantastic Red Metallic H2" and an "excellent example," which indicates a positive impression of its appearance and condition. The seller, @Easynametoremember, emphasizes the vehicle's readiness for a new owner, noting that it has recently passed Arizona's Emission Testing and has new tires, enhancing its appeal as a dependable option. The seller also showcases various operational features such as the air conditioning, horn, and power windows, which all function properly, further reassuring potential buyers of the vehicle's reliability.
Neutral: @Easynametoremember has provided detailed information about the Hummer H2. Alongside showcasing its features, the seller has made efforts to supply shipping estimates to various locations across the United States, which could enhance convenience for interested bidders. They also mention the availability of service receipts and Carfax information, providing bidders with insights into the vehicle's history, although some bidders like @MarlonBrando have asked for more comprehensive service records.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the limited service history available for the vehicle. @MarlonBrando inquires about the complete service history of the vehicle, pointing to a potential gap in information about its upkeep beyond what is provided by the seller, @Easynametoremember. The seller's response indicates that only certain receipts and documentation are available, which might lead some potential buyers to question the thoroughness of maintenance records.
![]() |




















































































































































