Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: @Atom0096 (The Seller) highlights the quality of the 1966 C2 Grand Sport tribute Corvette coupe, emphasizing that no expense was spared in its build. The attention to detail and quality from TK Corvettes is praised, indicating that this particular build is the most comprehensive of the three commissioned builds. The vehicle starts with a new custom frame that accommodates a 2017 Corvette C6 suspension, and it features excellent hydro boost power brakes, which enhances the driving experience significantly. Positive comments underscore the appeal and aesthetics of the car, making it a desirable option for potential buyers.
Neutral: Throughout the conversation, various potential buyers express interest and inquire about specifications. @Vct180 requests clarification on the HVAC functionality and mentions pictures of different exhaust systems, indicating a keen interest in the vehicle's features and performance. @DougR raises a question about a specific image that shows the 'PRND21' indicator alongside a manual transmission, reflecting curiosity regarding the vehicle's design elements. Additionally, @LT25 acknowledges the differences in exhaust configurations, showing an understanding of the vehicle's modifications, but without a strong opinion either way.
Negative: There are some concerns from the observers regarding specific details that need clarification. @DougR's question about the "PRND21" indicator being associated with a manual transmission points to possible confusion or misrepresentation of the vehicle's capabilities. @LT25 expresses uncertainty about the presence of side pipes versus the center rear exhaust, indicating a lack of consistency in the vehicle's visuals which could detract from buyer confidence. Overall, while the seller provides extensive information and clarifications, lingering questions highlight potential drawbacks for prospective buyers.
 |
 |
Positive: Commenters praise the vehicle, with @Gary_T1 declaring it the best car on the Panther platform and highlighting its overall quality. @spirit0fwar appreciates the photography, calling it a masterpiece, while @SDCR recalls fond memories of seeing the car in showrooms. @CarFoolLane notes Ford's strategic move in creating a RWD sedan with a powerful V8 to attract buyers who previously chose the Impala SS. Additionally, @maw06 points out the car's great features like a smooth ride and good gas mileage, emphasizing its dependability and comfort. @EstateMgmtLife reminisces about their positive experience with the car, endorsing it as a top-notch example of the Panther platform.
Neutral: There are some objective observations about the car's design and performance. @LeoFord (The Seller) mentions that the vehicle has undergone thorough maintenance, including paint correction and new battery installation. They also acknowledge that while the car had a minor incident reported on Carfax, there was no structural damage. Commenters like @Speccobra and @HeavyTank77 provide insights on modifications that could enhance the car's performance, discussing gear changes and engine alternatives without casting aspersions on the current state of the vehicle. @gododgerblue asks about the emissions sticker, reflecting pragmatic concerns from potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments express a degree of skepticism regarding the car's performance and production decisions. @maw06 and @rsporter50 suggest that while the car has appeal, it could have been better with a more powerful engine, specifically mentioning the absence of a supercharged variant. @HeavyTank77 feels that Ford was historically a step behind their competitors in performance. Furthermore, @ogSVT requests elaboration on the history of the car's repairs, indicating concerns about transparency in the vehicle's maintenance records. Overall, while there are many positive remarks, there are clear queries and issues that highlight the car's limitations.
|
 |
Positive: @Euro_Classica describes the 2011 Porsche Cayenne Turbo as a truly remarkable vehicle that blends luxury and power seamlessly. The seller highlights its excellent condition, absence of mechanical defects, and a well-documented maintenance history, making a strong case for potential buyers. Another commenter, @mylopolis, echoes this sentiment by praising their own experience with a similar model, stating it drives like a true Porsche with impressive towing capacity and performance that can be adjusted with the sport mode.
Neutral: @raj78 requested detailed pictures of the undercarriage, and @Euro_Classica promptly provided videos and photos demonstrating its condition. The seller also assured potential buyers that they would be available for questions and inquiries throughout the auction period. However, there were some questions about the car's history during adverse weather events, indicating a need for transparency on the vehicle's background.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the car's maintenance history, with @pmillerny and @Oenoboy both asking for clarification on what 'good maintenance history' entails. Additionally, @steeverino inquired about the vehicle's status during a hurricane and possible flooding, suggesting hesitance among some bidders regarding potential damage history or maintenance issues.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the 2004 Audi S4 Avant for its meticulous care and modifications made by @supracer (The Seller). @rustandmorerust noted that it clearly shows a lot of love and care, while @Sarki called it 'beyond hot', highlighting the quality of the vehicle. @jspann80 emphasized that the owner maintains very high standards and that the vehicle has been tastefully modified to enhance its driving experience without compromising its intended performance. Other users like @mesatter1 and @timwig expressed their admiration for the car's attractive features and performance potential, indicating excitement about the potential of owning such a vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments offered a balanced perspective on the vehicle and its presentation. @cfrankscid raised a question regarding a possible alteration to the rear badge, which @supracer addressed by explaining the debadging process. Others, like @gsb, inquired about the clutch's status and whether it was the original, which @supracer confirmed and supported with documentation. Fellow enthusiasts such as @greestate and @B7heaven provided insight into the model's overall reliability and maintenance, further contributing to understanding the car's condition and history without overtaking on either side of the positive or negative spectrum.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about specific issues regarding the vehicle. @cfrankscid questioned the condition of the rear badge, suggesting it appeared upside down, while @brooklyn13 inquired whether the car burned oil, to which @supracer confirmed it does not. There were concerns from users about past repairs, such as the need for timing chain replacements, with @brian18z inquiring about that directly. @greenstate asked about included stock parts, raising the notion that some original elements of the vehicle may have been sold off, which could leave potential buyers wanting. Overall, while negative comments were minimal, they did reflect a cautious approach to scrutinizing the vehicle's history.
|
 |
Positive: @Crovet praised the vehicle's beautiful shade reminiscent of Lime Rock Green, expressing a wish for Chevy to reintroduce a better green color. @valleyvintagerestoration (The Seller) emphasized the meticulous maintenance of the car, stating that everything works as it did when leaving the showroom, and assured potential buyers they would be ecstatic with the pristine condition of the vehicle. @johndavidware shared their enthusiasm for the car design and noted a nostalgic connection, expressing hope to bid on it.
Neutral: @GeorgeAlfa3 inquired about the AC functionality, while @Long2757 confirmed that it is already converted to R134a. @dobbaker asked about the tires' age, and @carlpop1 raised a question regarding the vehicle's ownership history, noting the discrepancy of 'one family owned' with four previous owners. @valleyvintagerestoration (The Seller) clarified ownership details and addressed concerns regarding the AC and features being functional, alongside the confirmation of a clean history with extensive service receipts.
Negative: @carlpop1 was skeptical about the 'one family owned' claim, and @RWD-FTW provided a counterpoint about car title ownership, suggesting that family ownership could be misrepresented. @Brookscompton expressed frustration at not receiving a response after multiple attempts to view the car, indicating potential communication issues with the seller. @Coat8870 pointed out that the tires were over eight years old based on date codes, raising concerns about tire suitability.
|
 |
Positive: @SlowNRusty highlights the enjoyment derived from the vehicle, stating it was driven as intended by its engineers. He commends its upkeep, noting that it's the highest mileage Gen 2 G-Wagon seen on BaT, showing kudos to its previous owners for regular maintenance. @911gt3rs mentions the vehicle's history, emphasizing that it was well cared for by its first owner who is a seasoned car enthusiast and reflects on how the modern iteration of the G-Wagon is an impressive improvement, reinforcing its rock-solid feel, unique design, and longevity as a masterpiece. Other users echoed positive sentiments about the vehicle's condition and craftsmanship.
Neutral: @Mwestchester1 raises a pragmatic question regarding the longevity of the vehicle, expressing concern about its mileage and potential for future servicing needs, which invites further discourse on durability and depreciation. @antonvt acknowledges the impressive condition of the vehicle for its mileage, suggesting it exemplifies how a well-maintained high-mileage car should appear. @Evo-Z inquires about specific features of the vehicle, indicating curiosity about specifications without assigning a clear bias toward the vehicle's quality.
Negative: @beau17 questions the paint thickness, noting it appears unusually high, which prompts a clarification from @911gt3rs, yet it indicates some skepticism regarding the vehicle's surface quality. @Schuler points out what he perceives as a flaw in the vehicle’s badging, implying previous owner negligence or modification. Additionally, @cdboyd seeks further documentation regarding service records and parts like the tires and window sticker, which hints at a desire for reassurance about the vehicle's integrity and history, suggesting considerations of doubt in terms of transparency.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle, particularly its rarity and originality. @spg356 noted the unique gauges that are specific to Okrasa powered cars, which adds to the car's authenticity. @kingkarmann acknowledged the overall condition, praising it as a 'really nice lowlight' with significant maintenance completed. @buc highlighted the originality of the dash and @49Hebmuller applauded the quality of the patina, suggesting that it has been well-preserved and restored in the right aspects.
Neutral: While there were many compliments, some comments brought up questions about certain details of the vehicle's condition and history. @jbannon1911 inquired about repainting and whether the body had been damaged, to which @52splitfan (The Seller) confirmed about the patina and restoration. Additionally, @JAL78 facilitated discussions about the originality of various parts, asking for clarification on the front seats and interior condition. These discussions indicate a mix of appreciation and curiosity among potential buyers.
Negative: However, not all feedback was positive. @TheGhiaGirl highlighted inconsistencies regarding the seller's claims of no accidents, pointing out visible damage in the video showing the inner fenders. @chipmcluk raised concerns about incorrect interior pieces and questioned the seller's honesty regarding the car's authenticity. Some users criticized the seller's responses to probing questions, suggesting it could impact buyer confidence; @lewisfoto labeled the seller’s dismissive attitude as rude, and others echoed similar sentiments, deeming the communication style detrimental to the vehicle's sale prospects.
|
 |
Positive: @benlakes (The Seller) has provided a lot of useful information about the vehicle, reassuring potential buyers that the A/C blows cold and works perfectly, measuring 55°F at the center vent. The Monsoon sound system is included, featuring the upgraded audio package with a factory subwoofer, enhancing the audio experience for music enthusiasts. @Havetrailer also commented positively, referring to the vehicle as a nice car, which reflects the overall aesthetic appeal and condition presented in the listing.
Neutral: Several commenters asked for additional information and clarity about specific features and conditions of the vehicle. @HMezger inquired about the short ownership period and any potential issues that might lead to selling. @Sketch1974 and @sbindley both raised concerns regarding the rear axle pinion seal and convertible top mechanism respectively, while @doorite1 requested a more detailed driving video to get a better impression of the vehicle’s performance and to confirm the absence of leaks. @DFLETCH4 also requested a video demonstrating the convertible top operation, showing that potential buyers are keen on understanding all aspects of the car.
Negative: Some comments pointed out concerns related to the vehicle's condition. @doorite1 was concerned about the oil pan gasket that was noted as seeping in the past, asking for clarification on its current state. @sbindley highlighted potential issues with the convertible top mechanism, specifically with the clips and flaps, questioning whether they fail often. Additionally, @DFLETCH4 raised an issue with the scrolling text on the information display in videos, indicating some potential confusion regarding the car’s electronics. While these comments express doubts, @benlakes (The Seller) was proactive in addressing these concerns, assuring potential buyers of the car's good condition.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its uniqueness and charm. @thunderrollin called it a "cool truck," reminiscing about family connections, while @Poolzilla1966 appreciated the distinct green paint and interior, noting it stands out among clones. The seller, @JReinhardt, echoed these sentiments, mentioning how delightful it is to drive and the positive reactions it garners from people on the road. Commenters like @TjKC and @CKKurtz also emphasized the value of these older trucks, stating that they are more interesting than modern vehicles and expressing excitement about their appreciation in the market.
Neutral: Some comments centered on the condition and mechanical aspects of the truck. @jumper82 inquired about specific details regarding the bed's condition under the mat and the original steering wheel. @CDehne pointed out potential improvements that could be made, like obtaining a Marti Report, which could enhance both the vehicle's value and appeal. @Todd_Z noted the truck's various imperfections, but still commented on the styling and its potential as a fun vehicle to own and drive. Meanwhile, several technical questions were posed about the engine and steering, revealing an interest in the truck's overall performance.
Negative: However, there were several criticisms aimed at the truck's current state and pricing. @john_chamorro was skeptical of the asking price of $10,000, considering it too high given the vehicle's condition, suggesting it should be priced between $2,000 to $4,000. He warned potential buyers that while it serves as a decent ranch truck, it requires significant investment for a rebuild. Other commenters echoed this sentiment, with @GTO400fourspeed acknowledging the truck's appeal but pointing out its need for further investment, and @sniktau suggesting that there may be excessive wear in crucial areas like the transmission. Overall, while many appreciate the truck's character, concerns regarding its mechanical reliability and pricing were prevalent.
|
 |
Positive: @GXguy470 expressed their satisfaction with the 2005 Limited Tundra, highlighting its perfect size and reliable 4.7 engine. @lunchbocks2002 noted the clean condition and solid options of the 1st Gen Tundra, appreciating that it has no frame issues. @Megabrooke called it a time capsule, praising its bulletproof reliability while mentioning their own positive experience with a similar Tundra. @BigTuna33 admired the rare color and condition of the truck and wished everyone good luck. Overall, commentators shared positive experiences and impressions of the Tundra's build quality and reliability.
Neutral: Several users, including @johnnyswell and @mercedes_123, engaged in a discussion about the vehicle's past location and potential return to the Mid-Atlantic, debating its suitability in areas prone to rust. @bonneville1959 inquired about the bed's dimensions, while @simsimma requested photos of the VIN stickers, showcasing a mix of curiosity and practical questions rather than emotional responses. Additional comments included inquiries about the painted running boards and the tow package, indicating a balanced interest in details surrounding the vehicle.
Negative: On the downside, some comments reflected concerns about care and maintenance. @Porschereborn (The Seller) discussed how the truck's pristine condition led to hesitance in using it for everyday purposes, potentially limiting its practicality as a work vehicle. @craigothelego noted that lower ball joints are known issues among the Tundra models, raising questions about their condition despite reassurances from service inspections. Discussions on modifications also garnered critique, with commenters like @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 expressing wariness about changes made to the original truck, suggesting such alterations could detract from its value. Overall, there was a sense of caution surrounding the truck's long-term maintenance and care.
|
 |
Positive: @cdrusn describes the vehicle as a beautiful 850, meticulously maintained by an enthusiast, indicating a favorable assessment of its condition. @HemiBoy63 expresses awe at the car's beauty, while @BigT77 emphasizes the classic appeal of the BMW 850 in black and notes its readiness for the road after recent maintenance. @V12THROTTLE highlights that the mileage is less important than the maintenance history, which in this case reflects care by a passionate owner, suggesting potential satisfaction for future buyers. Additionally, @chicosito praises the durability and simplicity of the M70 V12 engine, describing it as one of the most admired V12s produced and indicating the affordability of its maintenance compared to other engines.
Neutral: @Andrei29 (The Seller) introduces the auction, sharing details about the car's maintenance and a few known defects, such as a malfunctioning OEM radio and intermittent turn signal. @CoupeQuaTatiana raises questions regarding potential water damage from flooding in Tampa, which @Andrei29 reassures is not an issue since the car was never exposed to floodwaters. He clarifies the damage to the driver-side A-pillar as pertaining to the plastic trim rather than structural integrity, while other users, like @Jkitchin, mention interests related to specific features of the car, such as the cup holders, signaling a mix of inquiries about functionality.
Negative: Some concerns are raised regarding the vehicle’s condition. @CoupeQuaTatiana asks for clarification about the driver-side A-pillar damage and potential interior water damage, reflecting apprehension. @Octobermoon questions the presence of warning lights on the dashboard, indicating potential issues with the car’s systems, particularly the SRS and Check Engine lights mentioned by @Andrei29. Although he assures that they do not affect performance, the warning lights raise caution among potential buyers. Overall, while the vehicle has strong appreciation from many, the highlighted defects and questions about its functionality may deter some potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @Sigmagreen (The Seller) has presented a beautiful example of a 2005 Tahoe LT 4x4 in Dark Metallic Blue, and seems genuinely passionate about it. Several commenters, including @calamari_jujutsu and @GreaterGator, appreciate the truck's vintage appeal, comfort, reliability, and low mileage, noting that it stands out in a market where many such vehicles have high mileage or cosmetic wear. @dynamic1 and @OhioRoots10 highlighted the exceptional condition inside and outside the vehicle, expressing their intention to keep an eye on its auction.
Neutral: @Sigmagreen (The Seller) has addressed several inquiries regarding the vehicle's history and condition, including discussions about the Carfax report and minor dent repairs. He confirmed he is the second owner and provided details about the minor damage, clarifying that he chose not to repair it, allowing buyers the choice to do so. Commenters like @WIZZZZ and @dawoz629 raised questions about service history and mileage discrepancies, while @levenge explained the engine hours issue that several users seemed curious about, suggesting it could be a reset issue common in similar vehicles.
Negative: There are concerns raised by commenters like @flyfaster and @JohnF1966 about the accident history and whether the reported damages on the Carfax have been properly addressed. @Djfratoni and @Vetteaholic94 mentioned discrepancies between the engine hours and mileage, with doubts on the accuracy of the vehicle's reported use. Furthermore, @C.S.Iron questioned the color matching of the fender and the door, pointing to a potential repaint issue, prompting considerations about the overall paint quality.
|
 |
Positive: The comments from viewers such as @Button and @jayaimzzz highlight the positive aspects of the vehicle, referring to it as a "beauty of a car" that is "tastefully upgraded." @Button wishes the seller good luck with the sale, while @jayaimzzz appreciates the car's aesthetic and shows interest in additional details about its features. @barrybahama (The Seller) also contributes positively, mentioning that the car has always been garaged and is in near-perfect condition, which adds to the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: There are several neutral inquiries regarding the car's specifications and history. Commenters like @PorschePending and @mbb_2967 request more detailed pictures and videos, indicating a desire for transparency about the vehicle's condition with specific requests such as images of the underside and drive videos. Furthermore, @IronPinedo inquires about maintenance records and asks for close-ups of any imperfections, showing that potential buyers are evaluating the car's value rather than expressing strong opinions on its quality yet.
Negative: However, some comments raise concerns and questions that hint at potential issues. @Rockland queries the discrepancy regarding the car's ownership timeline reported by Carfax, which suggests uncertainty about the vehicle’s history. @barryward adds a dismissive tone, implying that those who are not interested should consider other options. Additionally, @deeyee08 and @IronPinedo seek clarifications on maintenance records and paintwork, which may indicate hesitance about the car's true condition. Overall, while there are many interested individuals, concerns about transparency and condition are prevalent.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the truck highlight its exceptional aesthetics and overall quality. @RockRowe expressed intense admiration for the truck's features such as the grill, emblems, and interior, while @Tucsonmike (The Seller) shared his enthusiasm, noting it has zero rust and is a factory big window model built in San Jose, California. @NVGT350 and @pigman also expressed their love for the truck, with @pigman especially praising the paint job.
Neutral: Several individuals engaged in technical discussions regarding the truck's specifications and features. @LYFSHRT asked for clarification on the speedometer and was informed by @Tucsonmike (The Seller) that the speedometer was not operational but was wired by professionals. @Dhturk provided guidance on identifying the rear axle, while @1940FordCOE discussed the advantages of the truck's rear-end design. The conversation revealed that potential buyers are keen on understanding the technical aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: Some criticisms emerged primarily surrounding the interior design. @DRIVEGUY noted that despite the substantial $90,000 investment, the mismatched interior failed to meet expectations. @Tucsonmike (The Seller) acknowledged this concern, admitting that the upholstery work did not align with his vision. Additionally, @LINGAFFERED raised questions about the speedometer functionality and other gauges, prompting @Tucsonmike (The Seller) to confirm only the speedometer was not working, which adds to the truck's lesser appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors have expressed admiration for the 1965 Corvette's aesthetic appeal and performance features. @RamseyM noted the Milano Maroon finish accentuating the classic design, mentioning the combination of the Fuelie L84 V8 and a 5-speed manual as a "sweet combo." @JohnF1966 appreciated the addition of the tilt column, emphasizing how it enhances ease of entry and exit from the vehicle. The seller, @alpineweiss86, highlighted the car's extensive history and certification, underscoring its value as a rare collectible. The overall sentiment reflects a strong appreciation for the vehicle's restoration and functional updates, along with praise for its well-documented history.
Neutral: Several comments addressed technical specifications and modifications rather than purely aesthetic perspectives. @Rich1DDS and @cal65vette engaged in a discussion about the vehicle's gear ratios and RPM at cruising speeds, showing interest in its performance capabilities. @Srl57 suggested that the front license bracket could be straightened for better presentation, while @mjv1953 inquired about the verification of the engine pad. The dialogue included requests for specific photos to address concerns regarding the vehicle's structure, demonstrating a practical interest in its condition beyond superficial attributes.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception of the vehicle, there were some concerns expressed by commenters. @masatsune raised issues regarding possible fiberglass repairs and the authenticity of the Fuel Injection (FI) emblem installation, indicating a need for thorough inspection. Additionally, @Kaz2 mentioned difficulty in getting responses from the seller, reflecting frustration in communication. Some comments from users like @willie2323 suggested the current gearing may not provide an enjoyable driving experience, highlighting a discrepancy between specifications and actual usage, which may discourage potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The unique Defender 110 XD Wolf is drawing positive attention from enthusiasts like @Roverguy101, who praises its military essence and potential for customization, expressing a desire to acquire it. @Valkyrja appreciates the seller's honesty, recognizing that these military vehicles are inherently rugged and not designed for luxury. @SHEKI_NYC shares admiration for the Wolf's tough and utilitarian design, noting its rarity in left-hand drive and the appreciation it deserves among fans.
Neutral: @GriotsMotors (The Seller) provides detailed insights into the vehicle's specifications, including recent modifications made for sale, such as new batteries and the removal of shelving for cargo space. Comments from various experts, including @Mike_Bassett and @GBRBiLL, delve into the specifics of the rear differential and engine sounds, with a general request for clarity on its mechanical condition. Several comments express interest in the vehicle's history, the legality of its import, and technical aspects, creating a discussion centered around the vehicle's authenticity and performance.
Negative: Concerns arise from comments indicating potential mechanical issues, such as unusual engine noises noticed by @Mike_Bassett, who likens the sound to a 'dying lawn mower' and questions whether it's an exhaust leak or other mechanical failure. @KDUX expresses skepticism regarding the engine sounds, stating it does not sound normal. @stinkybob and @GBRBiLL discuss vibration-related noises, suggesting they could point towards alignment or balance issues rather than typical engine sounds, which raises questions about the vehicle's overall condition as it approaches auction.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle, praising its excellent mechanical condition following significant restoration work totaling around $30,000. @EGDUSA, the seller, highlights numerous recent upgrades including a rebuilt fuel system, new brake components, and an upgraded rearend, contributing to a smooth driving experience. @DaveD finds the blend of vintage and modern features charming, while others like @Barryward and @Dollycat3 celebrate the vehicle's overall beauty and condition, suggesting it is a desirable option for potential buyers. Additionally, @Sparrownaut and @boatymcboatface believe that this car will appeal to someone seeking a classic driving experience due to its durability and performance, reinforcing its status as a valuable classic car.
Neutral: Despite the positive sentiments, some comments raise a few concerns or inquiries regarding the vehicle. @DaveD and @GT-RMAN question the presence of any leaks and the state of certain components like the tires. The seller responds that while some minor weeping from the transmission pan gasket has been observed, no significant leaks are present, which reassures potential buyers. Additionally, @Octobermoon raises concerns regarding the repaint quality and asks for clarifications about certain features in the photos, indicating a need for potential buyers to be cautious and informed about the vehicle's history and condition before making a purchase.
Negative: However, there are some reservations expressed by a few users. @V8roller shares an anecdote about a previous Shadow that had mechanical issues despite its charming ride, potentially indicating a cautious outlook towards maintenance concerns. @Octobermoon's mention of the apparent poor repaint and surface cracks may deter buyers who are particular about cosmetic imperfections. Such comments highlight the fact that while the car has been mechanically restored, certain aesthetic issues could affect its overall appeal and value, suggesting that prospective buyers should be prepared for future investments in cosmetic repairs.
|
 |
Positive: @Bdogz69 commented that the truck is excellent and @bondgraham expressed that it's the perfect farmer’s truck from the 60s and 70s, reflecting a nostalgic appreciation for its style. @rocketjohnny described it as a nice truck and @funkaholik described it as a nice, honest, driver-quality truck in a great color scheme, appreciating the patina of the original. @mtillots (The Seller) highlighted the truck's original daily driver status, time-earned patina, and solid performance on the highway, receiving positive reactions from others for its nostalgic value and presence at car shows.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific details regarding the truck's condition. @JacquesMerde asked about potential rust issues on the driver's side while retaining interest in the truck. @MachLoop sought clarification about rust-through and requested additional pictures of the truck's underside, ultimately expressing contentment with the truck's overall condition after further review. @David-C raised a concern regarding the New York registration and its applicability in other states, while @Hackberry reassured him about the transferability of the New York registration, providing context on common concerns with vehicles from such regions.
Negative: On the downside, @David-C pointed out that registering the truck in his state would be impossible without a title, raising concerns about its usability on the road. @65gt1ab indicated that there may be a patch panel in the sheet metal, which could imply potential repairs or issues with the truck. Additionally, @Bullcrappy questioned the truck's roadworthiness for longer drives, while @gracianoh expressed concerns about registering the truck in California, noting it could pose a challenge despite reassurances from @mtillots (The Seller). Overall, these comments indicate uncertainty about the registration process and the truck's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Barryward highlighted the vehicle's appeal, stating it's a nice Fleetwood, while @OldsBear joyfully commented on its good looks and @cruzahome referred to it as a "sexy low slung slug." Additionally, @Wgnman praised the creative solution for its cracked door armrests, nearly resembling the original design. @TheCritic deemed it a great car for enjoyment, noting its suitability for parades and even mentioning it comes with a parade boot. @Tigers196884 appreciated its round headlights and reasonable bumpers, calling it beautiful, and @Maximus1 expressed admiration, commenting that it is a beaut.
Neutral: @modes expressed a desire for the vehicle but noted the complications of transferring its registration from New York to Nevada due to concerns regarding displaced titles. @Gregpryckman discussed the leather's quality specifics in different model years, while @terminallySquare posed questions about the vehicle's condition, such as the state of its A/C and other electronic components. There were indications from others, like @GaypasPassion, that registering a car from New York in California had been manageable in the past, which somewhat alleviates concerns about DMV complications.
Negative: Comments from @Rrrrandy pointed out potential issues with the vehicle's Automatic Level Control, and @Roadmaster expressed skepticism about the registration process in California citing his own troubles with the DMV. @ddama1 raised concerns about what appeared to be alterations in certain photos, while @dawgeq87 questioned the visual integrity of the listing, worrying about signs of rust and suggesting that some images might have been poorly edited. @Gregpryckman further suggested the armrest repairs were not ideal and recommended finding replacements instead.
|
 |
Positive: @jdjonesdr expressed a feeling of vindication regarding spinners on trucks, stating that they look better than ever. @rgpiatt complimented the truck, noting he thinks it looks nice, while @Kizarsoza emphasized that not all vehicles need an LS engine, suggesting a preference for the truck's current setup.
Neutral: @rgpiatt sought clarification about the R 10 designation, acknowledging that he knows the differences between K 10 and C 10 trucks. @CJimmy provided a detailed response, explaining that in 1987 Chevy sold older square body trucks alongside newer designs, and the R 10 referred specifically to the 2wd square bodies for that year. @JLsKA510 inquired about the truck's ability to pass California smog regulations, asking if anything is missing from it.
Negative: @JLsKA510 referred to spinners as "faux knockoffs," suggesting a negative view on their current use, specifically associating them with a particular style of vehicle (Donks and Lowriders), which may carry a stigma for some truck enthusiasts.
|
 |
Positive: @Ovtchinnikoviouri (The Seller) describes the vehicle as extremely clean inside and out, noting that everything works as it should, including the convertible top hydraulic system. He assures potential buyers that there are no oil leaks and states that a new windshield will be installed soon after a rock chip turned into a crack. Additionally, he mentions that the hydraulic roof pistons have recently had their seals changed, addressing previous concerns from commenters.
Neutral: Several commentators raised technical questions about the vehicle, such as @CarCrazy24 inquiring about wiring harness repairs and @MrBeanCar asking about the usability of the rear seat. @davidsaidel shared his experience with a similar model while highlighting the vehicle's extra weight and build quality. @SSAKR wondered about the paint's originality, to which the seller responded that some panels had been repainted due to fading but confirmed there were no accidents or rust.
Negative: Concerns were raised about potential issues with the vehicle, specifically regarding the wiring harness as pointed out by @CarCrazy24, and @davidsaidel brought attention to possible leaks from the hydraulic pistons, which are critical for the soft top's operation. These points indicate uncertainties that prospective buyers might have regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and mechanical reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @GeoLineJDMImports (The Seller) presents the 1994 Suzuki Carry Pickup as a well-preserved classic utility truck, boasting only 38,000 kilometers (approximately 24,000 miles). This vehicle features a 657cc F6A inline-three engine with a five-speed manual transmission, ensuring reliable performance. The seller emphasizes its recent maintenance, which includes an oil and filter change, and describes it as clean, dependable, and perfect for enthusiasts or small business use.
Neutral: The seller provides detailed specifications of the Suzuki Carry, including its salient features like a white paint finish, gray cloth upholstery, and front disc brakes. Recent maintenance done in May 2025 ensures that all mechanical components are functioning excellently. Additionally, the seller notes that a video demonstrating all the vehicle's lights is attached, inviting potential buyers to reach out for more information and shipping quotes.
Negative: Commenters point out a few potential issues. @imagczar notes a bulb is out in the right front bumper directional, causing the right turn signal to blink faster than the left. @Crazydave01 inquires whether the vehicle is a 4WD model, indicating a possible concern for buyers looking for off-road capabilities. Additionally, there’s a note from the seller stating that the truck cannot be registered in California due to not being smog-compliant, which could deter some interested parties.
|
 |
Positive: @NVGT350 feels that this vehicle is a super choice with low mileage and describes it as very nice. @ENFIDL calls it a beautiful truck and appreciates the body style, noting that it appears to have been well cared for. @Buddys503, the seller, assures that it has been fully serviced, as indicated in the Carfax report, contributing to its positive remarks.
Neutral: @hatchetman asks about the functionality of the vacuum assist hubs for the 4x4 system, indicating a general curiosity about the vehicle's features. @Cepd202 seeks confirmation about the bed size and inquires whether any modifications like aftermarket exhaust or programmers have been made, suggesting an interest in understanding the vehicle's specifications more thoroughly. @Buddys503 confirms that it has an 8FT bed and that everything is stock with no aftermarket modifications.
Negative: @Bossssssss raises a concern about a potential noise from the idler pulley in the engine compartment, questioning if it might need a bearing replacement. Although @Buddys503 responds that it is not making any noise, this comment introduces a note of caution regarding possible maintenance issues that could affect the vehicle's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @ODA593 calling it a "beauty" and @ChristopherM3 stating it's "very nice!" @hettsautosales implied it would do well in bidding, highlighting its rare 2-door design. @NaplesLuxuryCars emphasized the vehicle's condition, insisting it's just as nice in person and noting that it runs and drives beautifully. The seller also mentioned the great functioning of the AC and stereo, and that overall, the car is in 9+ condition, which garnered a lot of positive attention.
Neutral: Several commenters asked questions regarding the vehicle's history and condition, such as @chrisjul inquiring about potential rust issues due to the vehicle's past residence in NJ and PA. Furthermore, @Hami888 was curious about when the XJ was repainted, and @LTZ100 sought confirmation about the original color. The seller provided detailed responses, clarifying that there are no significant rust issues, and shared specifics about improvements made by the previous owner, indicating the vehicle's well-maintained status.
Negative: However, there were some concerns raised regarding minor imperfections. @reloexprt requested clarity on the paint issues and corrosion mentioned in the listing. The seller acknowledged these imperfections while maintaining that they are not significant and provided an overview of what other blemishes exist, including minor scratches. Additionally, @Hawk865 pointed out a missing bolt in a specific photo, leading to queries about potential repair needs, which raised some doubts among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @kawikaturn describes the vehicle as a beauty, expressing excitement from California, while @tshebel (The Seller) also affirms the truck drives great and runs like new, indicating it can haul significantly. @bbbill contributes by mentioning he restored the truck and can provide restoration photos, implying high quality and care. There is also praise for the truck's desirability, with @Davey_Jones noting its coolness compared to modern trucks.
Neutral: Comments reflected an interest in the truck's performance, such as @rocketjohnny's light-hearted remarks about speed, and @r_carrie's inquiries regarding the truck's carburetor, expressing a desire for a driving video. The Seller's updates about the truck's specifications, including the six-volt system and driving capabilities, were noted. Measurements were provided in response to @kawikaturn's query about fitting the truck in a garage, highlighting engagement on practical matters.
Negative: Several comments raised concerns about the truck's condition, notably @1957Vintage's observations regarding gaps in the hood and possible rust issues, seeking clarification from @tshebel (The Seller). @ShedK noted a miss in the engine, suggesting it might only be running on three cylinders, while @r_carrie's comments expressed skepticism about the truck's carburetor and overall performance. These negative points reflected apprehensions about the actual running and appearance of the truck.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the bike for its performance and unique design. @singlespeed emphasized that it would make a great gift, while @BigT77 described it as a virtually new X-1 with no reserve, suggesting it only needs new tires and some gas to get going. Additionally, @68C10292 articulated that the Buell bikes offer an exhilarating experience of handling and torque, ideal for twisty roads, while also being easy to maintain, making them a special choice in the motorcycle market. @skyancher expressed confidence that new owners can be assured of the bike's quality, reinforcing its value as a fantastic purchase.
Neutral: Comments regarding the bike's physical condition highlighted mixed assessments. @wheelyneat inquired about the nature of some scratches, to which @dgreenberg (The Seller) clarified that there are minor surface scratches and a chip requiring attention while preserving originality. Additionally, the bike features original tires that @dgreenberg indicated should be replaced before riding. Furthermore, @sm300 commented on the wheels, noting their high-quality fabrication, which @bringatrailer confirmed led to a correction in the listing, showing responsiveness to feedback among the community.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about potential hidden costs associated with the bike. @Richard initiated a discussion regarding possible back DMV fees that could affect the buyer, especially if they reside in California. @gaw echoed these concerns, seeking clarification on the registration status. However, @dgreenberg (The Seller) addressed these worries by confirming that there are no back fees owed and specifying that the title was just acquired for the upcoming sale. Despite these negative inquiries, worries were alleviated, emphasizing transparency in the transaction.
|
1,914cc-Powered 1971 Volkswagen Karmann Ghia Convertible 4-Speed
1412203739
Lot 221794
Private Party
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received enthusiastic praise from multiple commenters, particularly for its striking color scheme and motor upgrade. @Automark described the Ghia as 'Sweet' and acknowledged its attractiveness with the current color. @LouFifer also expressed strong approval, noting the quality of the extensive rust repairs and how well the bodywork was done, promising it would be a pleasing addition to any collection. Additionally, the engine has been enhanced with performance modifications, and the sound of the exhaust has garnered positive remarks, contributing to the overall appeal of the vehicle. The upgrades, including the installation of front discs, are seen as valuable improvements to an already fine car.
Neutral: Several comments focused on specific aspects of the vehicle, highlighting areas of interest and requesting additional information. @jetracey, the seller, mentioned that they did not have a specific engine build sheet due to the company's work done on the engine. There were inquiries about the condition of the convertible top, with @2flit asking about the latch and potential leaks, and @BlueChief requesting information on repairs needed for the right-side convertible-top latch. Commenters also discussed the dashboard modifications and the restoration project, noting the expertise of ISP West, which added assurance to the car's quality. There were suggestions for videos to showcase the car's features, including cold start and driving conditions, which may help boost interest in the auction.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's electrical system, particularly its speedometer, clock, and fuel gauge. @BuckNutGuy specifically pointed out that the speedometer was inaccurate, and the clock did not function correctly, prompting concerns about other potential electrical issues. @LouFifer speculated that the larger tires could cause speedometer misreadings and tire rubbing. Some commenters highlighted the challenges of the current wheel and tire combination, suggesting that the fit may not be optimal. Adjustments like changing the tire size were recommended as easier fixes compared to a more complex rear disc brake conversion, which was also mentioned but viewed with skepticism regarding its necessity and efficacy in improving the vehicle's performance.
|
 |
Positive: @Vtec4ever praises the vehicle for its solid front axle, fuel injection, and heavy sheet metal, calling it possibly the best pickup truck ever manufactured. They highlight that this specific year features a unique configuration that surpasses modern offerings from Toyota, considering it a rare gem. @Anon shares enthusiasm for the FJ40 rims and hubcaps, noting that they contribute to the truck's overall appealing aesthetics. @gunnison expresses satisfaction with black steelies and hubs, mentioning they recently acquired them for their own vehicle and enjoy the look.
Neutral: @fj40dudeman (The Seller) shares a brief history of the truck, revealing that the previous owner was elderly, having possessed the vehicle for over 25 years. They mention that it was sold new from a local Toyota dealer and is largely original, aside from the wheels. @sourdough appreciates the condition of the truck's body and interior, acknowledging concerns about the automatic transmission's mileage but still considering it a good buy if it performs well. They further compare it to their own vehicle, indicating it has better original paint quality.
Negative: @marshmlow inquires about damage from an accident, suggesting a potential concern over the truck's condition. @fast_fred questions the need for a motor rebuild, recalling a similar experience with their own vehicle that required significant engine work. This raises doubts about the durability of the current truck's engine, especially with such high mileage, prompting concern among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as all sorts of amazing and very cool, praising the tremendous build. @tlcamg agrees, emphasizing the comfort and positive experiences shared by others with similar setups. @porkpiehat appreciates the quality engineering, likening it to a dream travel van, and @Dollycat3 adds that it is an absolutely handsome build. @CKKurtz admires specific design features, such as the round port window that fits perfectly with the interior vibe, and @themotoringclub highlights the tasteful setup with high-quality materials used, mentioning it was maintained by a local Mercedes-Benz dealer.
Neutral: @Coolguys inquires about air conditioning and roof leaks, while @blackonblack911 and @CarFoolLane express interest in window configurations and the van's upfitting costs. @laruemartin lists several questions regarding the van's specifications such as inverter presence and weight capacity of the pop-top bed. @RodH asks for height measurements to ensure fit in a parking location. Multiple comments reflect curiosity about the vehicle's sleeping arrangements and clarify technical details like battery brands and water systems. @themotoringclub provides responses to these inquiries, maintaining engagement with potential buyers.
Negative: @Wildboar expresses concern about the four-cylinder engine being overworked given the vehicle's weight, while @MAmft brings up comparisons to older models. @gretnagritty points out potential issues with power handling in urban settings. @CarFoolLane and @Wildboar also express skepticism about the vehicle's capability while responding to varying opinions on engine performance. @Bennieg highlights a lack of rear seat belts, raising safety concerns, and several users show interest in various unclear features. @themotoringclub acknowledges some limitations while responding to these questions.
|
 |
Positive: @wmcnair praised the vehicle's beauty, while @1996tt commended the seller for always detailing cars to perfection. @davidv1007 provided a positive outlook on the car despite some concerns, emphasizing the importance of transparency regarding its history and condition.
Neutral: @amotorsports, the Seller, defended the vehicle's maintenance history, explaining that while there are some aesthetic imperfections, the car has significant recent maintenance backed by extensive documentation. There were questions about the climate control displays and the ticking sound from the M96.03 motor, with @ken9__ and @agreen22 seeking clarification on these issues, while @DerkPerk and @SoGi inquired about specific photos and details.
Negative: There were multiple comments expressing skepticism about the extensive repair bills. @Vanace questioned the large sum spent on repairs for a base model 911 with a tiptronic transmission, suggesting a 997 would have been a better choice. @Djtanta criticized the choice of a $100 stereo after spending $51k on services. @Thetatebaumercollection noted the high service costs and implied that it might be better to invest that amount in a Turbo instead.
|
 |
Positive: The 2010 Range Rover Sport HSE is highly praised for its combination of classic luxury and athletic performance. @Jkapnick (The Seller) notes that this vehicle represents one of the best generations, powered by a reliable 5.0-liter V8 engine that provides smooth performance. The vehicle has been well-maintained, recently undergoing extensive servicing at an authorized Land Rover dealer, which included significant work totaling nearly $6K. The truck is reported to run beautifully and drives tight, confirming its quality as a well-kept example of the Range Rover Sport.
Neutral: A few potential buyers have raised questions regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, particularly about the timing chain. @RDM7533 asked if the timing chain had been replaced, to which @Jkapnick (The Seller) responded that it has not been replaced, but there were no signs of issues during a thorough inspection. The seller has also addressed concerns about noted oil seepage and fuel odor, stating they were minor and not impacting the vehicle's performance or safety.
Negative: Some comments lack confidence in the vehicle's reliability due to historical issues with timing chains in European brands. @HeavyTank77 expressed a more general frustration about the design of engines from these brands, questioning why reliability remains a concern after so many years. Additionally, @RDM7533 mentioned previous observations of oil seepage and fuel odors which some may see as red flags, even though the diagnosis from the dealer indicated they were not critical issues.
|
 |
Positive: @stugottz expressed a warm sentiment for the classic John Deere, sharing a fond memory of their children playing with a John Deere tricycle. @danielreitz reminisced about participating in a 4-H tractor driving competition, fondly recalling how the John Deere B made his day. @threelbcs also shared a nostalgic moment, stating that the John Deere B was the first motorized vehicle they drove, highlighting its significance in their childhood.
Neutral: @gs1M (The Seller) provided insight into the tractor's operation, mentioning the challenge of performing a cold start while simultaneously holding a camera, which he managed with one hand. He also welcomed inquiries about the tractor and indicated he would respond promptly, demonstrating a commitment to good customer service. Additionally, he addressed the logistical concerns about transport, offering to store the tractor until the weather improved for the winning bidder.
Negative: The comments did not contain any explicit negative feedback about the vehicle. Instead, the interactions focused on positive memories and experiences related to the John Deere B. Some users did express a sense of nostalgia and longing, such as @danielreitz, who felt that due to his age, he could not enjoy the tractor as much as someone younger might.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the HMMWV as a delightful vehicle, highlighting its blue and white color scheme and cool build, while @Tobyallen praises the use of spray-on bedliner as an impressive design choice that enhances the vehicle's aesthetic. @Maga17 adds a sense of nostalgia by referencing 007 and the film's 'Moke Hummer', suggesting that the design is evocative of cinematic history. The seller, @Classiccarmaverick, expresses the joy of maintaining the original theme of the vehicle inspired by the 'moke', even referring to it as a 'hummoke' among friends, further emphasizing the creative vision behind this project.
Neutral: Several comments raise inquiries about the vehicle's features and specifications. For example, @CJones11 asks if the doors are included, indicating potential buyer interest in the vehicle's complete package. @Classiccarmaverick, the seller, takes the opportunity to elaborate on some exciting features of the vehicle, including removable teak-look flooring, upgraded LED lighting, and retrofitted gauges that enhance both functionality and appearance. This extra information may attract attention from prospective buyers looking for modern upgrades in combination with classic design.
Negative: While the comments predominantly show excitement and appreciation for the vehicle, no significantly critical remarks are noted. However, the inquiry about the inclusion of doors from @CJones11 subtly points to a potential concern about incomplete features that prospective buyers might expect. Additionally, the lack of detailed criticisms may suggest a limited perspective on any drawbacks that the vehicle might have, leading to the impression that some buyers may remain curious or hesitant about certain aspects.
|
 |
Positive: @Flashpix expressed a fondness for the 2-door model, particularly appreciating the Sport option and wishing luck to the seller. @JAY-Z highlighted the rarity of the 5-speed transmission and praised the Blazer's appealing history. @styop554 (The Seller) provided insight into the truck's unique background, originating from a U.S. Navy veteran, and emphasized its historical significance and condition as an untouched classic.
Neutral: @styop554 (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the vehicle's condition, explaining that 'seepage' refers to a typical light film of oil on older vehicles without active leaks, and reassured potential buyers that everything functions correctly. @maxtorq requested better pictures of the vehicle's undercarriage and door bottoms, which the seller promptly provided. @styop554 also clarified the dealership's process regarding document fees in California, emphasizing consistency and compliance with state regulations.
Negative: @AutoTraitor commented on the passenger side body damage, suggesting it may have affected the vehicle's valuation despite its rarity. @GAK911 mentioned that charging a doc fee is not mandatory in California and seemed to raise concerns about the fee's necessity. @Markjr questioned the previous listing's market response and inquired about the specific parts replaced under the A/C system, indicating skepticism towards the vehicle's pricing strategy.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors have expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle, particularly its appearance and condition. @TylerDog described it as a 'cool looking GTS' and encouraged others to place their bids, indicating an overall favorable impression. @LongiMotorsports, the seller, presented the Cayenne GTS as a 'fantastic' one-owner vehicle from Florida and highlighted its striking carmine red color, showcasing pride in the car's aesthetic and ownership history. The seller also mentioned recent maintenance, including oil changes and brake work, which contributes to a sense of reliability.
Neutral: Several neutral questions were raised by potential buyers seeking more information about the vehicle. @BMH1210 inquired about service records and the presence of a factory transfer case, showing interest in the vehicle's history. @Gttrev asked for a walk-around video and details about the car’s specifications, indicating a desire for more visual confirmation of the car's condition. @Siradrad and @Romand076 also sought clarifications regarding the transfer case and the condition of the interior, reflecting common concerns amongst buyers without expressing strong opinions.
Negative: Concerns were mentioned regarding the air suspension and possible mechanical issues. @ShotByDrew pointed out a hissing sound from the front left wheel during a video, raising questions about the air suspension's functionality after the vehicle had been sitting. The seller confirmed that the car had been stationary for four days and noted that there was no sag, but the buyer's worries lingered. Additionally, @Siradrad's inquiry about whether the transfer case was replaced indicates apprehension regarding potential issues, highlighting a degree of skepticism among buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's condition, with @Dspoljaric noting it as a "timeless classic" and @ZENWERKS stating it looks "as good as new." @AP2V3 reflects on nostalgic memories related to the car's sporty design, while @ohhimark_ specifically mentions the car seems to be one of the nicest E32 models available. The seller, @QueenElizabeth3, emphasizes the car's excellent condition, stating that it shows as new with no visible flaws and a perfect interior.
Neutral: Several users inquire about the car's history and mechanical details. @RickyBobby89 asks for more background about the car's acquisition, while @antonvt and @CTVolvo seek clarification on specific features and functional aspects, such as the headlights and radio unit. @HBChris has prior experience with the vehicle and follows up on maintenance items, demonstrating an interest in the car's upkeep and any repairs that may have been conducted by the current owner.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about specific issues with the vehicle. @HBChris questions whether the driver’s side window motor was fixed, and @antonvt points out a broken taillight that was not addressed by the seller prior. Additionally, @PDXPACGM brings up the potential issues related to engine blocks, asking about the engine type, while @E28E34 corrects a detail about power antennas. These comments indicate a level of scrutiny regarding the vehicle's condition and historical repairs.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm about the car, highlighting its vibrant Guards Red color and overall appearance. @Wrench589 called it a 'great car' and wished luck to the seller, while @boaboyoz described it as a 'wonderful Wayne 997.1 Turbo cabriolet.' @sirhankbob emphasized that this model and color combination represents a personal favorite, calling it 'about as good as it gets.' The seller, @cnyncrvr, actively engaged with commenters, providing information about the car's auction status and its charity-related history, which further intrigued potential buyers.
Neutral: Some users posed practical questions regarding the car's condition and specifications. @AliBabatheDon suggested the seller post more professional photos, while @stuart_bernsteinpb inquired about the coolant lines, to which @cnyncrvr responded affirmatively. Questions regarding the car's interior, such as the driver's seat condition and whether the original rear seats were available, were raised by @5phited5 and @meptmoore. The seller addressed many of these questions, illustrating a willingness to provide transparency regarding the vehicle's history and current status.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car's condition and previous history, particularly regarding its auction at Copart. @Goeringer expressed suspicion about potential flood damage, while @MTH criticized the listing photos for their quality, saying they were 'awful.' @Shawnkohan noted a rattling sound in the driving video, prompting inquiries about transparency regarding the vehicle’s issues. @80-Topdown commented negatively on the state of the wheels, suggesting they had seen better days despite the car having only 30k miles. This mixed feedback may raise additional scrutiny for interested buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Trafficator expressed admiration for the hardtop design, noting it is among the best looking in convertibles. @alskin appreciates the beauty of the TR6, stating their own longstanding attachment to a similar model for over 25 years. @TR6racer found the vehicle exceptionally clean and original, hinting at good prospects for its condition. @Hanesart dreams of owning it one day while @thunderrollin can easily envision cruising in the vehicle along the Pacific Coast Highway. @Spud126 also commended the vehicle, calling it beautiful and lamenting a lack of garage space to accommodate such a fine car.
Neutral: @777miller (The Seller) addressed various inquiries, confirming that the pinstripes are painted and responding to concerns about the clutch. He reiterated that he has had no issues with the car and noted ongoing interest in the auction, providing details about paint imperfections and gauge fogging due to humidity. @maggie70 remarked on the vehicle's repeated listings since 2018, raising questions about its sale history, which @777miller acknowledged by mentioning his reasons for selling. @Phantom5oh and others noted that some sounds from the car's engine are typical, suggesting possible normal maintenance requirements like valve adjustments.
Negative: Comments raised by @Jaybird_57 and @mrhemi426 pointed out concerns about engine sounds, suggesting possible underlying mechanical issues. @IrishWhiskey described a past experience with a similar model that ultimately led to canceling a purchase due to undisclosed issues which were later addressed by the previous owner. @Paparoar questioned the car's condition regarding visible repairs and paint blemishes, inquiring further about the specifics of the imperfections noted in photos. Additionally, @JRZ brought up a concern about fogged gauges, suggesting a potential problem that could arise in humid climates.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received several positive comments regarding its condition and features. @pbeis (The Seller) confirmed that the tire date codes are older but with good tread, indicating they drive well. The trunk welds also appear solid, as noted by @Lengrep, who complimented their appearance. Additionally, @pbeis assured @Uk215m3 that it comes with two keys and the original book packs, further highlighting the care taken in maintaining the car's integrity. @2002dave referred to the vehicle as a fine example and emphasized the pleasurable driving experience of its engine.
Neutral: Some neutral observations focused on the vehicle's history and ownership. @E36M34ME mentioned the car having already seen seven owners, likening it to a foster child searching for a permanent home, while also noting its origins in sunny California. @georgesauto asked about the original components and @pbeis confirmed that the original head unit is included but that the original suspension parts were disposed of due to wear. @Eurowagonguy and others discussed the auction dynamics, noting how enthusiasts often wish for their vehicles to land in the hands of fellow enthusiasts, reflecting a shared concern for the car culture.
Negative: On the other hand, numerous negative comments revolved around the impact of dealers and flippers on the auction scene. @MidwestMint and @Eurowagonguy expressed frustration regarding how dealers inflate prices and control the market, making it difficult for genuine enthusiasts to acquire vehicles at reasonable prices. @MidwestMint characterized the actions of some participants as greedy, thus negatively affecting the car culture. @Frearmike84 suggested that the bidding process is fair, but many commentary reflect a deeper concern about maintaining the integrity of the auction environment, suggesting it is being compromised by dealer influence.
|
 |
Positive: @jackal69 described the vehicle as beautiful, while @Ferrariboy35 expressed excitement about wanting one, highlighting its desirability. @Tobyallen also praised the car for its fantastic appearance and noted that he found the two-tone color scheme appealing, even stating the red and white combination looks great. @tkfudge mentioned that he believes the car is nice and would love to use it as a weekend driver, indicating it holds high personal value regardless of authenticity.
Neutral: @CaddyLT4 inquired about the rear axle gear ratio and posi features, indicating curiosity regarding the vehicle's performance specifications. @PARF raised questions about whether the vehicle is being offered as a genuine W30, as they noted discrepancies in the car's parts from the expected specifications, suggesting that documentation and specific images would clarify its authenticity. @Djordan442 shared insight into the vehicle's modifications, noting that it is a good-looking car although it might not be a legit W30 variant, emphasizing the need for proper documentation to ascertain its value.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the authenticity of the vehicle's W30 status, such as @Djordan442, who expressed skepticism about it being a real W30 due to questionable head replacements and the lack of documentation. @texxas pointed out potential issues with the gas tank setup, noting the presence of duct tape and suggesting that the car needs attention on minor details. @Wydomkr questioned whether the rear axle housing is a genuine W-27, indicating that the aftermarket cover may detract from the vehicle's original pedigree.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's unique and stunning Magnolia paint color, with @CKart mentioning it as their favorite for a Bentley. @JoeJo3 referred to the color as rare and beautiful, while @dmarti02 noted that the pictures do not do it justice and described the car as classy and subtle. The seller, @mccallum84, expressed their love for the Bentley and highlighted the pleasurable driving experience and the car's ability to impress, especially when valet parking. They described it as a dream car that exceeded expectations, particularly enjoying the luxurious interior and performance.
Neutral: Several questions arose about the vehicle's service history, particularly regarding past repairs to the air suspension system. @mwelling inquired about this history, while @innuenado000 asked about the functionality of the driver massage system and the soft close function for the rear door, indicating that these issues were previously reported. The seller, @mccallum84, was forthcoming in responding to these queries, noting they hadn't used the car enough to gather detailed repair information but provided costs for parts that could address the observed problems.
Negative: There were concerns raised by potential buyers about the vehicle's condition and functional issues. @bo28, for instance, asked about the non-working massage feature and the soft close mechanism for the rear door, to which @mccallum84 confirmed the massage function working but not guaranteeing future performance. There were also inquiries regarding the original tires and scratches on the exhaust tips and front fascia, with @bo28 seeking clarification on their conditions. The seller assured potential buyers that the tires seemed new and that the apparent scratches were exaggerated in the photos, expressing a willingness to provide additional images to resolve concerns.
|
 |
Positive: @Airliner1 describes the Porsche as "a nicely equipped manual 997.2 Carrera S in beautiful condition," indicating it's a desirable choice among enthusiasts. @Lesr3204 adds that it's visually appealing, commenting, "Looks good. Sounds pretty healthy." @remoorejr loves its desirability and performance, stating, "One of the most desirable Porsches ever built IMHO," reflecting a strong appreciation for its legendary sound and driving experience. @dpogosov84 (The Seller) shares his bittersweet decision to sell, emphasizing the car's mix of analog driving pleasure and modern amenities, reinforcing its status as a classic.
Neutral: @JulesJules questions the appearance of the wheels, but @dpogosov84 clarifies that they are the original color, having been ceramic coated to enhance their look. @Paddict8 requests service inspection details, which @dpogosov84 responds to by providing information and making efforts to acquire a complete report. @Pinestraw inquires about the car's performance and mechanical health, and @dpogosov84 reassures that it runs well and is mechanically sorted, showing a thoughtful approach to addressing potential concerns from interested buyers.
Negative: Some comments indicate concerns over the exhaust modifications and emissions testing. @JoeKai asks about emissions compliance, while @np89 wonders about noise levels potentially disturbing neighbors. There’s also a note of skepticism regarding the seller's rationale for selling the car after only 300 miles of enjoyment, highlighted by @JH911p's comment. @Swjohnson1948 asks for a DME over-rev record, indicating a desire for more performance data that the seller struggles to provide due to dealer backlogs.
|
 |
Positive: @Intimidator04 and @ssterry appreciate the rarity of the ’68 Z/28 models, noting that their production numbers are significantly lower than the ’69 models, which increases their desirability among collectors. @Pearlj10 highlights the beauty of the car and the blue interior, while @boaboyoz calls it a lovely example of a LeMans Blue Z/28, suggesting it’s a great representation of the classic Camaro. Several commenters like @decisionsdecisions and @Turbo930Bud express their admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, reminiscing about their experiences and wished they could have owned one like it.
Neutral: Comments from @Fartjokes and @KurtSS inquire about specific technical details such as the brakes and parts authenticity, indicating a desire for more transparency in the auction listing. @carmen69 suggests that obtaining a MacNeish report could help increase the car's credibility during the auction process. @1carnotenough raises the point of needing VIN and production numbers for verification, reflecting an interest in ensuring authenticity without passing judgment on the seller. Meanwhile, @Dank74, the seller, acknowledges the inquiries and conveys that he has learned from the feedback while trying to provide all the information he has.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters like @KurtSS express skepticism about the authenticity of the engine and transmission stamps, suggesting they might not be original. @7601mikej voices frustration over the seller's lack of responses to questions, reflecting concerns over communication and engagement in the auction process. @Boeing75 raises a critical question about the car being matching numbers, implying that discrepancies in documentation can impact the potential value significantly. This skepticism may deter some potential buyers who seek complete assurance about the vehicle's history.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters appreciated the vehicle's appearance and driving experience. @Drjay242 complimented the nice exterior and interior color combination, expressing that it makes him smile every time he gets into it. @Bsolomon37 (The Seller) mentioned that the car drives and handles very well, describing it as a super fun little car to drive, which was further echoed by other enthusiasts. In response to requests for driving videos, @Bsolomon37 (The Seller) promised to provide footage demonstrating its fun driving capabilities and confirmed that both the AC and heater are in good working order.
Neutral: @Bsolomon37 (The Seller) clarified the reasons for the quick resale, stating that it originally belonged to a family friend who was murdered. This explanation seemed to add a level of seriousness to the sale that commenters noted. @Bsolomon37 (The Seller) also addressed inquiries regarding a reported minor accident, admitting he had little information on the specifics but reassured potential buyers that the car drives well despite its history. This context provided a more complicated view of the vehicle's background.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns regarding potential issues with the vehicle. @drbill201 questioned why the Mini was being sold again so quickly, insinuating possible problems. @Rich_Truett pointed out the timing chain/tensioner issues common in these engines, which could deter some buyers. There was also a request for more information regarding the car's accident history, with @TAH_Tiger specifically asking about details that @Bsolomon37 (The Seller) could not provide, potentially raising red flags for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @UncleFred1 describes the vehicle as a wonderful car in near original showroom condition, emphasizing its comfort and the presence of seat warmers. @bigchachu appreciates the low mileage, highlighting it as a rare find. @packardv8 considers it a beautiful example of one of the best driver M-Bs, showcasing the car's reputation for quality and comfort. The seller, @socal_vc, highlights the car’s exceptional care and pristine condition, noting that it runs and drives like new, with no current issues reported. Comments also indicate excitement and positive anticipation regarding its potential as a Christmas gift.
Neutral: @laxski32 and @1783pictures express curiosity about the quick resale and ask if any work has been done in the last 18 months. @Highedu asks questions about potential issues, seeking reassurance about the vehicle's condition, while @Connoisseur1956 inquires about the original non-chromed wheels that came with the car. There are also questions regarding the rearview camera from @son_of_stig and maintenance specifics from @Gian123, indicating interest in the vehicle's specifications and history. @socal_vc assures that the car is in great shape with videos to be updated soon, and provides detailed responses to each inquiry.
Negative: @Highedu expresses skepticism about the quick sale, questioning if there are any mechanical or body issues prompting the rapid turnover. @samirhadeed points out potential concerns over chips on the vehicle’s hood. Additionally, @goranscuric raises a question about the car's service history, noting a service discrepancy that suggests potential issues caused by previous management. Overall, there are concerns about the vehicle's condition and history despite the seller's reassurances.
|
 |
Positive: @Kandyman1 (The Seller) describes the 1970 Restomod K5 Blazer as an incredible and high-quality build that is extremely clean. He emphasizes its solid construction following a thorough inspection by a reputable custom shop, and mentioned that it runs and handles impressively. He shared his positive experience driving it 850 miles from Pagosa Springs to Dallas, stating it drove 'like a champ'. Commenters like @boaboyoz praise the vehicle, calling it a 'tremendous Texas Blazer' and a 'Bodacious build.' The acknowledgment of the quality of this vehicle suggests a strong positive reception from the community.
Neutral: One of the questions posed by @clarkw59 seeks details about the rebuilt title, specifically regarding the nature of the accident that led to it. @Kandyman1 responded by explaining that he purchased the Blazer through Mecum and lacks previous history, but reassured potential buyers that the rebuild is solid. @44magFTW inquires about the availability of a hardtop, which @Kandyman1 confirms he does not possess, stating modifications would be complex. Additionally, @Middler89 asks for information regarding fuel economy, to which @Kandyman1 provides figures from his previous trips, indicating 15.4 mpg on the highway and 12 mpg in casual driving.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's safety features, particularly regarding seatbelts. @Davebrookins pointed out the absence of seatbelts, which @Kandyman1 acknowledged as an easy addition but noted it was not originally included in the build. @Exeter questioned the lack of a heater, with the seller confirming that the design was intended to be heaterless. This lack of basic safety features and amenities may deter some potential buyers, as @Kandyman1 himself admitted these were items he hadn't yet addressed.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors expressed admiration for the vehicle's overall condition and features. @DraganMitic highlighted the cleanliness and loaded nature of the DTS, noting their appreciation for the model, while also mentioning their fondness for similar cars. @Sumo337 praised the ride comfort of the DTS, comparing it favorably to other luxury sedans, indicating that it was a beloved choice for their mother. There was also a positive consensus about the car's desirability, with @ericdev revealing a strong demand for models with specific seating configurations that make them more rare.
Neutral: Several comments revolved around the clarification of vehicle specifications and tire information. @papawojo raised a question regarding a disclaimer found on a Discount Tire receipt, which led to a discussion about the correct tire sizes and types related to the DTS. @JasonS76 (The Seller) confirmed that the discrepancy was due to the use of a different brand of tire, reiterating @DraganMitic's explanation. Additionally, comments touched on the differences in trim levels, with @AnnOnymous seeking clarity on features that may vary.
Negative: Some concerns about the vehicle's aesthetics were raised, particularly regarding the condition of the chrome wheels. @jbowders commented on the 'mottled' appearance of the wheels, questioning how it happened and expressing uncertainty about how to clean them. In response, @JasonS76 (The Seller) apologized for the poor quality of the photos and clarified that the wheels were actually in immaculate condition, suggesting that the spots were merely reflections of leaves.
|
 |
Positive: @LukAutoGroup highlights the 1957 Austin FX3 London Taxi's charm, referring to it as an exceptional example of a recognizable London taxi that runs and drives great. @cardude76 appreciates it as a wonderful piece of history, reminiscing about past experiences riding in these iconic vehicles. Additionally, @V12LUV admires its lovely appearance and notes a unique feature about its turning radius that was designed to handle London’s roundabouts, showcasing the vehicle's practical design for city use.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle also touch on its intriguing design and mechanical aspects. @brakeservo shares their personal history with Austin FX3 taxis, mentioning both had been owned by them and highlighting the unique experience of using one for family transport. @Vintageant brings up a question about the rod-actuated drum brakes specific to the 1957 model, indicating an interest in the technical specifications.
Negative: @FX3_4 mentions safety concerns related to the manual/rod brakes, expressing uncertainty about the vehicle's stopping power, particularly when modifications for more power were made. Although they admire the appearance of the taxi, their experience suggests potential performance issues. These sentiments showcase a mix of nostalgia and caution among previous owners about the vehicle's capabilities.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight that the Borrani wheels being sold are in superb condition with only very minor blemishes noted on one wheel. Seller @Tomme9 confirmed that they are original/authentic Borrani wheels with period correct mild steel/chromed spokes, which is a significant selling point for collectors. He also indicated a willingness to assist buyers with shipping logistics, positioning the wheels as a valuable investment since they retail new for over $21,000 for the set.
Neutral: Several inquiries about the wheels clarify their specifications and compatibility. @fhenley requested confirmation on whether the wheels were original Borrani and how to tell the difference between original and stainless steel spokes. @Tomme9 addressed this concern, providing evidence of the wheels’ authenticity and discussing their historical significance in the automotive world, particularly their association with Ferrari and other prestigious brands.
Negative: Concerns arose around the wheels' authenticity, specifically regarding their spokes. @fhenley mentioned having had prior experiences with misrepresented Borrani wheels that turned out to have stainless steel spokes instead of the original mild steel, which could drastically affect the wheels' value. Additionally, there was a minor point made about the color quality in the photographs, as @fhenley noted that the pictures appeared yellowish and could hinder the assessment of the wheels' condition.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle and its condition. @nebby99, for instance, praised the one-owner history and overall appearance, noting that a high mileage does raise curiosity. @AlfaBase pointed out the fine quality of the listing and highlighted the preservation of the car, especially the interior, suggesting the owner took great care of it. Additionally, @pryso reflected on high-mileage vehicles that are well-maintained, sharing a personal experience with an older car that provided great enjoyment, while expressing hope that this Alfa Spider fares well in the auction.
Neutral: The comments comprised a range of inquiries and observations regarding the car's condition and maintenance. @Lorenzoo raised questions about the nature of the respray, citing specific areas of potential concern, such as door jambs and under-hood inspections. @flyinlo focused on the car's registration status and requested a smog certificate for potential buyers. Furthermore, @pwsharpe suggested additional images of the chassis and trunk area to inspect for further corrosion, indicating a desire for thorough vetting before making a purchase decision.
Negative: Concerns were raised about specific mechanical issues that may affect buyers' confidence in the vehicle. @Bartleby8 pointed out a disconcerting oil pressure gauge reading at idle, which @BayAreaRomeo, the seller, acknowledged but reassured that it might just require an oil change and further investigation. @Jayd_57 noted that after the car's significant mileage, components such as the driveshaft and suspension could need maintenance, displaying some skepticism about the vehicle's overall readiness. There was also some frustration expressed about increasing auction prices, as shown by @Bartleby8, indicating a challenging environment for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 1974 Saab 99, praising its classic style, unique features, and nostalgic value. @EstobanMcQueen highlighted the car's attractive front end, while @porkpiehat and several others appreciated the thoughtful design elements like the 'Extra' switch, suggesting its potential for future upgrades. @Gorufu reminisced about the five-door versions being referred to as notchbacks, showcasing the community's deep knowledge of Saab nomenclature. The overall tone conveyed a sense of enthusiasm for this model, with @Jaguar3.4 exclaiming it feels like a 'Time Machine' and @Hooptiedriver expressing intent to bid on what they called a car too nice to pass up.
Neutral: Comments also included some practical mentions regarding specific features and maintenance of the Saab 99, with @Gary_S inquiring about the type of muffler installed and asking for underbody pictures. @saabstories99 (The Seller) confirmed the fuel pump location and hinted at the car's history, maintaining that it had been well cared for, yet hinting at the need for some maintenance. @Carmalarky encouraged potential bidders by highlighting the car's original period color, which was appreciated by many viewers, and @JJpengr shared fond memories of his own experience with a similar model, noting its versatility and durability.
Negative: On the flip side, some negative aspects were raised about the car's condition. @saabstories99 (The Seller) noted peeling paint due to previous bodywork from an accident but assured that there was no rust issue. The front caliper also reportedly sticks intermittently, and the condition of the upper front seat upholstery was questioned, with it being labeled unglued. @Captainclink shared experiences of older Saab models suffering from rust issues, while others raised concerns about high maintenance needs in the past, specifically regarding ignition problems and engine concerns in earlier Saab models, indicating an awareness of the vehicle's potential challenges.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciate the unique aesthetic of the vehicle, with @DFNewland expressing admiration for its Hot Wheels-like appearance, describing it as both appealing and candy-like. @gokstate commends the seller's honest response regarding the mileage discrepancy, highlighting a sentiment that the value in CarFax reports is often overstated. Additionally, the seller, @Strangerwithnoname, shares a deep appreciation for the car's pristine condition and low mileage, reminiscing about its history and carefully detailing the maintenance work he performed before selling, which enhances buyer confidence in the vehicle's reliability.
Neutral: The seller, @Strangerwithnoname, provides thorough explanations regarding the history of the vehicle and the reasons for its sale, which include assisting a friend's widow. He mentions that the car has been in storage for years and describes the work done to it, such as the oil change and repairs, ensuring potential buyers that it runs perfectly. Communication between interested buyers and the seller is active, with inquiries about the car's condition and operational capabilities, showcasing a sense of openness in the sale.
Negative: Some commenters express skepticism about the vehicle's reported mileage, with @internettrunk questioning the seller's motives for parting with such a long-desired car, while others resonate with this sentiment. @hairyolds mentions that the mileage is believable due to the car's design but acknowledges the emotional weight of the sale related to the seller's lost friendship. Concerns about the potential for hidden flaws or issues in a used car are subtly hinted at through various questions regarding rust, mechanical performance, and the overall condition from different commenters.
|
 |
Positive: @WilliamBoldson remarked on the car's beautiful appearance, praising its stunning color and mint condition, while also wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @OT1000 expressed appreciation for the M119 engine, stating that it's the driver’s engine and that W210 represents the last generation of a solid Mercedes mindset. @chalkboss also appreciated the detailed photographs, emphasizing the beauty of the car. @notsorossa praised both the car and the seller, wishing them well in the sale, while @JGraham highlighted the rarity of the car, its low mileage, and the agreed-upon aesthetic appeal of the W210 as a timeless Mercedes design.
Neutral: The seller, @twj010104, provided an extensive overview of the vehicle's specifications, including details about its active suspension and unique interior features. They mentioned the limited production of the E50 AMG and compared it with the more commonly known E55. Moreover, the seller addressed questions regarding the condition, paint, and parts availability, reassuring prospective buyers about the car's mechanical aspects and the existence of various sourcing options for parts. The seller further explained the varying shades of the Black Opal paint, attributing them to the effects of lighting and photography, and showed willingness to provide additional information when they return from their trip.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the car's condition and the challenges of maintaining an older vehicle. For instance, @SirMercsALot questioned why the car was allowed to fall into a non-running state prior to the seller's acquisition, expressing relief that it had been revived. @EA911 inquired about the potential color discrepancies seen in some photos, suggesting that paint meter readings would help confirm the paint’s condition. @Ssalley echoed worries about sourcing parts for a vehicle of this age, while @SockPuppet acknowledged that while most mechanical parts are available, replacement keys may pose difficulties.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, emphasizing its beauty and craftsmanship. @Moneyfoot described it as a beautiful piece, while @Dollycat3 praised the gorgeous color, beautiful interior, and the fantastic upgrades that make it exceptional. Other users, such as @boaboyoz and @CaraBetta, complimented the build quality and aesthetic appeal, with remarks about the lovely burgundy finish and the investment likely required for such a restoration. @TheCritic highlighted the effort put into restoring and modifying the Cadillac, appreciating its classic character without excessive modifications.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the car's features and functionality without strong emotional undertones. @Rweiss6 noted the absence of seat belts, which could point to a potential safety concern, and wondered if the car could serve as a comfortable daily driver. @ButWhatDoIKnow raised practical questions regarding features like rack and pinion steering and whether the vehicle had been converted to a 12-volt system, which @BidRunner confirmed. The discussion about heating systems, like the Vintage Air, and how they were integrated was also present, indicating a mix of curiosity and practicality among commenters.
Negative: Some comments pointed out potential shortcomings and quirks of the vehicle. @TheCritic questioned why the Cadillac sat high in the rear and expressed concerns regarding the retention of original drum brakes, suggesting modifications might still be needed for an optimal driving experience. Similarly, @goldengup criticized Vintage Air for not using more authentic controls in line with the vintage aesthetic. @Proartguy acknowledged that while some believe modern features like power steering and rack and pinion are necessary, he found his own similar vehicle steered well without these upgrades, hinting at differing opinions regarding modern conveniences in classic cars.
|
 |
Positive: @Ontwowheelsaz describes the bike as the best model to own, highlighting features like its color combo, four pipes, and the unique single seat for this year. They mention their own identical bike's reliability and smooth performance at cruising speeds. @BigT77 appreciates the detail and quality of the restoration, suggesting the bike feels as good as new. @KenTillyUK shares fond memories of riding a 1951 model, praising its smoothness and performance, while @Bayouboy recalls riding an Ariel Square Four across the USA in the 70s, calling it dependable and enjoyable. @MNberg admires the aesthetics and design upgrades of the MK II, likening it to a sporty, luxury bike.
Neutral: Multiple users engage in discussions about the bike's riding experience, with @IanW seeking comparisons to other models. @Maark70fish (The Seller) mentions the bike's sophisticated ride compared to other vintage bikes, defining it more as a cruiser than a sporty ride. Users like @Blocksteel note that while the bike has low-end torque and is enjoyable, it has certain limitations when cornering due to the rear suspension design. @Leverone and @halcyonmotors debate the color of the bike, with references to specific shades and finishes that enhance its beauty. @Maark70fish (The Seller) accurately maintains that the bike is regularly started to avoid mechanical issues, including wet-sumping.
Negative: Some comments reflect concern about the bike's condition and functionality. @pacers35 questions why the bike has only been ridden 15 miles in two years, suggesting possible tank cleaning issues. @csilver1 raises concerns about damage on the tank from lever contacts, indicating possible poor handling. @Blocksteel warns against starting methods that may cause long-term damage, advising caution for the bike's health. @Maark70fish (The Seller) acknowledges paint mismatches and previous damage to the tank from the levers, suggesting that repairs could be done but they don’t impact its award-winning status. Overall, there are varying degrees of skepticism regarding past maintenance and reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's appearance and craftsmanship. @Jfp58 described the lead photo as a joyful sight akin to a Christmas morning unwrapping, praising the color combination. @GLWTA! and @GDogg echoed this sentiment, calling the vehicle simply spectacular, while @kkherman added a brief but enthusiastic "Nice!" @Shawh agreed with @Jfp58, remarking on how well everything flows together and celebrating the great colors used in the car's design. @mccand, despite discussing the vehicle's authenticity, declared themselves part of "team beehive" for the car, appreciating both its modifications and aesthetic.
Neutral: Some comments highlighted discussions regarding the vehicle's historical accuracy and original features. @Bordeaux provided insights into the vehicle's serial numbers and their correctness in the context of its model year. @revron also contributed notable facts from the Porsche specifications booklet, clarifying potential anomalies related to the production year and model changes. @jpfrazier (The Seller) acknowledged these discussions, emphasizing that the vehicle's charm lies in its modifications rather than strict adherence to factory specifications. @eldonchas brought up points about the car's extensive rust repair, showing an interest in its restoration quality and modifications but ultimately left the bidding decision open-ended.
Negative: A few commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's authenticity and modifications. @willy questioned the originality of the California black plates and suggested they might not be genuine, while @Tim_Berardelli highlighted the alteration of the engine number, expressing the need for transparency about the car's identification. @zeres pointed out discrepancies regarding the motor's specifications, which @jpfrazier (The Seller) contested, asserting that the engine case is correctly stamped "1600." Concerns about possible extensive rust repairs were also voiced, with @eldonchas distinguishing between their use of the term "extensive
|
 |
Positive: @GruppeC956 shares a nostalgic experience of owning a 2012 Carrera GTS Cab, praising its perfect blend of classic styling and modern features. They fondly remember driving it predominantly with the top down, even in colder weather, and highlighted the car's great performance, comfort, and reliability, expressing a strong desire to have it back despite acknowledging its accident history. @GruppeC956 wishes good luck to the seller in the auction, implying confidence in the vehicle's general appeal despite concerns.
Neutral: @Rmcmotorcars (The Seller) provides transparency regarding the vehicle's condition by confirming that the previous owner reported a repaint on the passenger door, which was corroborated by a PPI from Don Wise Auto Werks. They also share a DME report, aiming to answer questions from interested buyers. Other commenters, like @Laxplaya11385 and @mccand, seek clarification about the DME report and its implications for the car's engine performance, indicating a cautious approach among potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's past are raised by various commenters, including @CaveDweller and @Lesr3204, who emphasize the need for a detailed explanation of the accident damage and its impact on the car's value. @krjp and @PMUZI suggest that the reported over-revs in the DME report indicate that the engine has been subjected to rigorous driving conditions, which could pose a risk of damage. @Schnabby argues that buyers might need to treat the purchase with skepticism, urging the seller to clarify the history to avoid losing potential interest.
|
 |
Positive: The comments surrounding the 2015 Corvette Z06 3LZ showcase a lot of positive feedback regarding its specifications and maintenance. @Gorge1087 (The Seller) highlights the vehicle's key features, including its manual transmission, upgraded magnetic struts, and recent maintenance. Commenters like @AlPalmer10 and @BigT77 commend the car for being a nicely equipped model with excellent options, stating it’s a great example of a first-year C7 Z06. Additionally, the sentiment that the car is ready for the next enthusiast is echoed by various commenters, praising its condition and performance capabilities.
Neutral: Several comments clarify details about the car, particularly regarding its transmission type, previous ownership, and specific maintenance work that has been completed. @WeKneeDragger raises a question about the transmission, which @Gorge1087 promptly addresses as a typo. There is also a discussion about the car's history as a former rental, with @Pacheco167 questioning this assertion, leading @Gorge1087 to confirm it was a lease and reassuring potential bidders about the car's condition. Commenters inquire about the specifics of the maintenance and modifications, indicating a general curiosity about the vehicle's performance history.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, a few concerns are raised among the comments. @Pacheco167 notes that the car has had six owners and was a previous rental, which raises questions about its history, though @Gorge1087 counters this by explaining the car's leased history. Another concern comes from @eagales, who asks whether the car would pass smog tests, to which @Gorge1087 responds that it currently does not due to the absence of catalytic converters. Additionally, @Mkk1 raises an inquiry about the replacement of the rear wheels with replicas, suggesting potential concerns about the car's original parts and modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @Espanolie commented that the vehicle looks great and appreciated the fitting of Corbeau seats, noting it as an excellent addition. @snafuracer, the seller, shared his experience of refreshing the vehicle mechanically and emphasized comfort with the new seats, which provided much-needed legroom. The seller also expressed enjoyment driving the car daily, highlighting the supportive community he has encountered from other drivers that have given him waves and thumbs up while on the road.
Neutral: The seller, @snafuracer, provided a detailed backstory of the vehicle, indicating that it was previously owned by a friend and had experienced some failures before he made extensive mechanical repairs, including replacing many major components. While the vehicle has some cosmetic points to address, he confirmed that it performs well mechanically and is equipped with various features like functioning windows and air conditioning. However, the sunroof and trip odometer have issues, yet he noted the sunroof does not leak even during heavy rain. @driveclassics inquired if the original seats were part of the sale, to which the seller clarified they were not due to their poor condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @BradleyCopper regarding the sunroof, as the listing originally stated that it leaks, which contradicted the seller's assurances that it does not leak. This discrepancy could lead to confusion or mistrust among potential buyers. Additionally, though the seller has worked on many mechanical aspects, he admitted that certain features, such as the rear heat, are not functioning, which might be a downside for some prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Blizzard340 thinks the vehicle is excellent and encourages others to get one while they are still affordable, appreciating the exterior color despite a minor concern about the Porsche grey. @drjoesc believes this vehicle could provide a wonderful introduction to the Porsche experience for a new buyer, while @gsh2 describes the car as beautiful, inquiring about how many keys come with it. @Boxster99, who has owned a similar model, praises the car's handling and reliability, noting its excellent experience over years of ownership. The seller, @specialtycarsflorida, assures everyone that everything works on the vehicle as it should and that it is a fun car to drive, highlighting the perfect weather conditions for enjoying a top-down experience.
Neutral: @Pivo responds to @Blizzard340 by discussing color preferences and how they impact comfort, emphasizing that both black and gray interiors are manageable in heat. @911s55 shows some concern about the car's registration status and points out the potential need for general service due to aging parts. Commenter @NewUpper asks several relevant questions about the vehicle's condition, including inconsistencies like missing clear coat and potential de-lamination of the windshield, showing their interest in understanding the car's overall state. The seller mentions their background as a father-son restoration shop, reflecting their passion and expertise in hand-picking vehicles without consignment, which reassures potential buyers.
Negative: @mini33 acknowledges that the IMS bearing issue is a significant concern when considering the vehicle, suggesting that potential buyers should factor it into their bidding strategies given the car's low mileage. @Pivo criticizes the repeated mention of the IMS issue amongst the community, implying that the topic has become overly discussed. @Dk91364 raises a question about possible clutch issues, while @911s55 makes a remark about someone exceeding the speed limit, indicating a potential concern about the car's shared driving history.
|
 |
Positive: @cheezboy praised the bike's beauty and questioned why @Flea was selling it so soon. @Asalvadore442 described it as a killer Harley, emphasizing its connection to Flea. @Closed_Casket, despite not being a Harley enthusiast, found the bike stunning and noted its potential high resale value. @Foothill74 lauded the new touring chassis as amazing and highlighted the bike's long-distance riding potential. @ripper996 expressed hope that the new owner would enjoy drives with someone special on the back. @mach1970 provided helpful information regarding the bike's warranty and confirmed details from the listing, reinforcing the bike's new condition.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about practical details of the bike, such as its title (@MagniMan) and warranty status (@Cowboyrick). @Boomer54 and @famous discussed the Tour Pack's removability, with @mr_fillup offering clarification from Harley Davidson. @DakotaSteve initially confused the sale terms but later recognized it was a consignment from Flea, reflecting a common question about dealer versus private sales in vehicle purchases. @DarkotaSteve later seemed to enjoy his mix-up with a touch of light-heartedness, asking for coffee and displaying engagement with the listing.
Negative: @BigT77 made a sarcastic remark about @Flea's short ownership and suggested that he might have had difficulties with the bike. @gunnison referred to the bike as 'too hot for Flea', insinuating it might be challenging for the musician. @BigT77 also made an odd comparison between the bike and fleas, reflecting a negative tone. Overall, the commenters maintained a light-hearted jest, but some comments hinted at skepticism regarding Flea's decision to sell so soon.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors such as @GDogg praised the vehicle, referring to it as a "Fantastic C4S Coupe." Additionally, @9114SDA42 expressed admiration, calling it a "Beautiful car." Enthusiasts like @TristanvG also contributed positive remarks, humorously commenting that both the car and a home for sale could be attractive to a buyer. Overall, many comments suggested an appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and performance features, including the mention of the Porsche Sport Exhaust and meticulous maintenance.
Neutral: @mdimarino (The Seller) provided detailed information regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, clarifying concerns raised by bidders about the car's service schedule and any potential issues. The seller confirmed the car had been maintained at authorized Porsche centers, highlighting that a full-service inspection had been completed recently with no issues reported. They offered to provide additional details upon request and included photos and receipts related to past services, addressing inquiries about brake pad replacements and battery changes.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance, particularly from @TooManyPorsches, who pointed out the lack of detailed maintenance records and asked for specifics on several service intervals including the serpentine belt and all-wheel drive system. There were also worries about white residue found on the underbody, with suggestions it could be linked to oil leaks, which @mdimarino addressed by stating it was due to tracing powder from a previous service. Commentors like @XAMfed noted discrepancies in the listing about features such as the seats, causing further scrutiny regarding the overall condition and accuracy of the vehicle's claims.
|
 |
Positive: @baileymelvin showcases his 1989 Toyota Land Cruiser as a well-loved vehicle, having owned it for three years and maintained it diligently. He highlights numerous upgrades, including an Old Man Emu suspension kit, powerful cold AC, and significant sound deadening for a quieter ride. The truck has been reliable for long highway trips and has undergone regular inspections and repairs, showing that it has been cherished by all its previous owners. He expresses his desire for it to go to someone who will appreciate it just as much, noting that it’s his favorite vehicle despite having owned various other Land Cruisers before.
Neutral: Commenters like @DavidLeeRaleighNC bring up the open recall concerning the fuel tank replacement, asking @baileymelvin why it wasn't addressed during his ownership. While @baileymelvin admits he was not aware of the recall until he reviewed the Carfax report, he emphasizes that he has never experienced issues with the vehicle. The conversation reflects a broader dialogue about maintenance and risk management, with some users defending the truck's condition given its mileage, while others express concerns about safety implications of the recall.
Negative: Some comments raise questions regarding the vehicle's high mileage and its potential implications for bidding, with user @Glickflik suggesting it might be affecting interest. Additionally, @bjergsoe questions whether the vehicle would pass smog inspections in California, indicating regulatory issues that could affect prospective buyers. @DavidLeeRaleighNC argues that inquiries about the recall aren't alarmist but rather sensible requests for information that could concern potential bidders, reflecting a sentiment that buyers should be fully informed about any risks associated with the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the vehicle's build and features, with users like @wsettle68 expressing excitement over the truck being a "hoss" and noting the quality of the bench seat. @albabanshee99 conveyed their love for the vehicle, calling it a "tank," while @Bmarcum reminisced about the turbo diesel from International and congratulated the new owner on acquiring a well-regarded model. Users appreciated aspects such as the two-tone color scheme mentioned by @70_duster, and the overall enthusiasm for the sound of the engine, highlighted by @becomingblue's comment on the admirable sound of the truck, suggests that many consider it an appealing investment.
Neutral: Several commenters asked practical questions regarding the truck's features and maintenance. @heiduschke inquired about the dual fuel tanks, to which @Mjclassictrucks (The Seller) confirmed both tanks are operational. @stuartsitko and @Markerolo sought more details on engine maintenance and receipts for previous repairs. @johnshroe and @pdipp discussed the quality of the truck's paint job, with the seller clarifying which parts were repainted. Overall, there appears to be a collective interest in understanding the vehicle's condition and maintenance history further, leading to positive engagement with the seller.
Negative: The comments include some concerns about the truck's condition. Users pointed out potential appearances of paint drips in specific photos, leading to inquiries about the repainting job from @johnshroe and @pdipp, indicating a possible issue with the quality of work that may concern potential buyers. @Dieselrulz expressed a desire for a startup video, hinting that the prior absence of such a video may have created doubt. Additionally, there was a desire for receipts concerning maintenance work from the previous owner, which could suggest skepticism regarding the seller's claims about the truck's upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle being listed is a 2017 G63 AMG, which @Jalen59 (The Seller) presents enthusiastically, indicating it is beautiful inside and out and drives exceptionally well. @Jalen59 is responsive to inquiries, offering to provide additional photos and even a cold start video for potential buyers, demonstrating commitment to transparency. The seller's engagement with comments reflects a willingness to address concerns regarding the vehicle's history and conditions, enhancing the appeal of the car for potential buyers who appreciate an informed purchase.
Neutral: Several commenters are curious about the vehicle's history, as indicated by @neejah, who questions the number of owners and the rapid turnover. @Briansarni asks practical questions about the vehicle's maintenance records and the age of the tires and battery. While these inquiries are not negative, they suggest that potential buyers want more insight into the vehicle’s condition and ownership timeline, reflecting a common concern in the high-end vehicle market.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism regarding the vehicle's past ownership, hinting at possible red flags. @neejah's question about the high number of previous owners indicates a concern about the car's desirability and the motivations behind frequent selling. Additionally, @Supah's inquiry into the missing emblems from the vehicle suggests concerns about neglect or quality, further contributing to a perception of potential underlying issues with the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @ZSRCollections (The Seller) has highlighted the beauty and excellent condition of the 2000 Porsche Carrera 4. The vehicle has been fully inspected and maintained by Porsche Centre Winnipeg, ensuring it is ready for the new owner’s enjoyment. The original black paint and well-preserved interior contribute to its appeal, with the seller noting it as a gorgeous example of a well-maintained 911. Many comments appreciate the car's overall aesthetic and smooth driving experience, and @ZSRCollections mentions that it comes with a complete service history from previous owners, indicating careful upkeep over the years.
Neutral: Several comments involve inquiries about specific details of the vehicle, such as the build date, tax obligations for importation, and condition specifics like tire tread and windshield state. @ZSRCollections responds proactively to each inquiry, offering information on duties for importing to the US and clarifications regarding the condition of tires and the windshield. The seller’s willingness to answer questions and engage with potential buyers is seen positively, showing their commitment to transparency in the sales process.
Negative: Concerns regarding the IMS bearing replacement and the vehicle's exposure to harsh winter conditions were raised by commentors such as @YVRNJB and @Paschal. While @ZSRCollections provided reassurances about the car's condition, they acknowledged that there was no record of the IMS bearing being replaced, which could be off-putting for some buyers. Additionally, the uncertainty around the borescope service history left some potential buyers wanting further assurance about the car's internal components, indicating a need for more thorough disclosure about past maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm and admiration for the 2007 Porsche 911 Targa 4S, appreciating aspects such as its low mileage and impressive appearance despite the potential harsh conditions of its past. @stathios highlighted the vehicle's well-maintained service history, investing around $15k, along with the benefit of low annual mileage that suggests it was primarily a weekend car. @GDogg called the Targa 4S 'spectacular' while @Boatymcboatface complimented @stathios on his effort in selling the car. Additionally, @Iger00 acknowledged @stathios's honesty in representing the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters had inquiries concerning the vehicle's specifics, such as the Targa hatchback feature in the 2007 model compared to newer ones, and details regarding its service history and current mechanical issues. @domvial and @Alexthegreat488 asked about the sunshade's malfunction and the roof's operability, displaying interest in its operational condition. @JFJacob requested clarification on documented service since late 2020, reflecting a common concern amongst potential buyers about maintenance transparency, while @Ethan2002 inquired about possible wheel spacers.
Negative: On the downside, there were concerns raised about potential issues with the vehicle. @domvial specifically requested more detailed information about the non-operational sunshade, questioning the cost to repair it. @Alexthegreat488 expressed unease regarding intermittent failures and possible leakage, while also inquiring about bore scoring. @Iger00 took note of the vehicle's exposure to inclement weather, suggesting that this might be a point of concern for buyers worried about rust or structural integrity due to salt exposure during winters.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its classic British aesthetic and overall appeal. @TPC1957 remarked on its nice appearance, and @Spider_Mike appreciated it as a timeless classic, suggesting that the new owner should embrace the vintage vibe with appropriate attire. @jturner mentioned the enjoyable nature of these cars, noting their ease of maintenance and strong community support. @NiceRumble and @rlincoln contributed to the discussion around the car's color, referring to it as 'real BRG' and appreciating the specific color combination used in the restoration.
Neutral: The seller, @tim54575, responded to various inquiries and expressed gratitude for the bids, emphasizing the vehicle's strengths as a driver rather than a show car. He acknowledged the comments on the steering wheel and sought to address concerns regarding the top's fit. Despite difficult circumstances due to the car's storage situation, he communicated openly about the vehicle's condition and his hopes for further engagement during the auction process. Other commenters like @broodie expressed a desire to see the car's top in better condition and requested pictures, showing an interest in details.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the condition of the car, particularly regarding the top as noted by @broodie, who inquired about its looseness and requested additional photos with the side curtains installed. @tim54575 addressed this issue, explaining the situation during the photo shoot and apologizing for not being able to provide more images at the moment. However, no particularly harsh criticisms surfaced about the car's quality, focusing mainly on minor aspects that potential buyers wanted clarified.
|
 |
Positive: @Ziegelrot highlights the attractive appearance of the cabriolet, noting its unique 811 ziegelrotmetallic paint color exclusive to the 1983 and 1984 model years. @Fairmont663336 agrees, pointing out the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle by mentioning its beautiful appearance. @Carsofflorida (The Seller) reinforces the driving enjoyment associated with the vehicle, describing it as one of the most enjoyable driving experiences he has ever had, indicating a strong connection to its historical performance.
Neutral: @Hamptoncars requests additional information regarding a driving video and pictures of the vehicle's interior, including details about the brakes and clutch. @Lochrie2 inquires about the specific paint code, to which @Carsofflorida (The Seller) responds promptly, providing the requested paint code as X3 Kiln Red Metallic and referencing the comprehensive service records available for the car over its lifespan.
Negative: @Hamptoncars expresses concern over the age of the clutch replacement, which occurred 27 years ago, likely suggesting worries about the ongoing reliability and performance of that component. Despite receiving detailed service history from @Carsofflorida (The Seller), some potential buyers may still have apprehensions related to the age of the vehicle and its parts, indicating a cautious perspective on the vehicle's ongoing condition.
|
 |
Positive: @ssterry expresses a deep affection for the ‘57 model, appreciating its classic style without excessive modifications. @boaboyoz also highlights the beauty of the BC Bel Air, complimenting the build. @thunderrollin shares a nostalgic connection, revealing how the car's color and condition evoke fond memories, specifically admiring the sweet soft yellow shade.
Neutral: @jerrybleaf (The Seller) confirms that the condition of the seats is not as concerning as some may think, stating that any apparent stain is merely a shadow. @old912fanatic inquires about any potential stains on the driver's side seat, while @67vettesw asks about rust on various car components, showing a concern for the overall condition without expressing a definitive view about the car's quality.
Negative: While there are no overtly negative comments, some inquiries hint at underlying concerns. @johnny0620 questions the appraisal process, feeling it lacking transparency by omitting the actual appraisal page. @TimSullivan raises a practical concern regarding the title transfer and registration process in California, which could point to potential bureaucratic hurdles associated with importing the vehicle.
|
22k-Mile 2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Coupe 3LT Z51 7-Speed
1G1YL2D79E5107497
Lot 221823
Private Party
 |
Positive: @BigT77 praised the vehicle for its desirable features, commenting on the Laguna Blue color, manual transmission, Z51 package, and 3LT trim that make it a coveted first-year C7 model. @tp808 also expressed enthusiasm about the car being their wife's 'dream car,' showing a strong interest in following its auction until the end before placing a bid. Overall, there's a sense of admiration for the vehicle's specifications and its appeal as a collectible piece.
Neutral: @henryg.lacanada (The Seller) responded to requests by agreeing to create additional videos showcasing both a cold start and a driving segment, while explaining that earlier video content had limitations. The seller addressed concerns raised by @JeffreyN regarding darker marks in the photos, offering clarification that they were likely just water or oil. Furthermore, they provided insights on the car's cooling system, mentioning how the temperature gauge operates during different driving conditions.
Negative: @GrigioF430 raised a concern about the initial cold start video not adequately representing a true cold start, indicating it was only 10 seconds long and didn't display a proper temperature. @Arne069 questioned the legitimacy of the video clip as the water temperature appeared to be significantly high when it ended. Additionally, @tp808 noted that the temperature display in the video might not be accurate as it was cut off while the vehicle was in motion.
|
 |
Positive: @gshadow325 emphasizes the rarity of the Subaru Forester STI, noting it is a unique model that is scarce in Japan and among the first to arrive in America. The seller highlights the vehicle's stock STI features, including special STI stamped BBS forged wheels and a significant reduction in speed limiter when utilizing a proper tune for U.S. fuel. The car's excellent handling and potential for customization with coilovers and wheels are also celebrated, showcasing its performance capabilities. Additionally, @gshadow325 uses humor and light-heartedness to describe the car's winter performance, which adds a positive tone to the overall presentation.
Neutral: Several comments reference the vehicle's automatic transmission as a point of contention, with @Jharding79 expressing disappointment that it is not a manual. However, @gshadow325 responds by explaining that the STI Foresters were only produced in automatic, addressing the rarity and uniqueness of this specific model. Other users, like @LukeNotLegend, comment on their positive experiences with automatic versions, indicating that while preference for manual is common among enthusiasts, there is still a market for automatics. @gshadow325 also provides statistics on STI Forester production, further emphasizing the vehicle's special status.
Negative: Some comments express dissatisfaction with the automatic transmission, with @Jharding79 specifically labeling it a 'damn shame' that the vehicle is not available in manual. This sentiment is echoed by those who prefer manual vehicles, highlighting a divide among potential buyers. Additionally, @gshadow325 shares concerns about a navigation screen issue within the glove box that needs addressing, which may deter potential buyers who expect all components to be in perfect condition. Overall, while the comments display a fascination with the vehicle’s rarity, the challenges of having an automatic and minor issues may affect its appeal to certain enthusiasts.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @fella3, provides a detailed overview of the vehicle's features, including that it is currently tuned with a DS1 tune, and the PPF is complete on the full front, mirrors, and A-pillars. Additionally, they mention that a second set of BBS 21-inch wheels is available for purchase. The tires, Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, were recently replaced with less than 300 miles on them, ensuring high performance. The seller also highlights that the exhaust is new, correctly installed, and the turbocharger oil strainer recall has been performed. Furthermore, @fella3 assures that the vehicle is a non-smoking car and suggests confidence in the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @comraddrewsky, @SoCal2TXAudi, and @Ijg4503, inquired about specific aspects of the car, such as whether it has been tuned, details about previous accidents, and the condition of the engine mounts. @Wifedoesntknow questioned the ability to restore signal lights to factory specifications and the type of tires used. The seller confirms details regarding the accident, stating damage occurred during shipping, which was addressed by replacing the front bumper cover and carbon fiber lip. There were also discussions regarding color variations in the brake calipers and modifications to the car over its lifespan, with some commenters noting that the vehicle may have gone through a "boy racer phase" under previous ownership.
Negative: . Some commenters expressed concerns about the car's modifications and history, with @P0rsche956 noting inconsistencies in the brake calipers and suggesting that the car could have been altered significantly by earlier owners. They and others like @campbellsoup29 are interested in the timeline of modifications and tuning, questioning the reliability of the aftermarket adjustments. Additionally, there are inquiries about the lack of a window sticker or specification list, which could help clarify the vehicle's history and features. @jjeremyw04 also requests videos to assess the car's performance and condition, which @fella3 is currently unable to provide.
|
 |
Positive: @dunlapimports (The Seller) describes the bike as beautiful and in perfect shape, complete with all keys and books. The bike also comes with a full factory warranty until April 27, making it an attractive option for potential buyers. Additionally, @HeyNk compliments the bike's color, stating it is very nice and smooth, although the seller clarifies its appearance under different lighting conditions.
Neutral: @dunlapimports (The Seller) provides clarity regarding the registration laws in California concerning the Harley Davidson and Indian models after the stated mileage. Also, the seller shares a link to a new 2025 model on another platform, indicating transparency and availability of comparison options for potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns, such as @GoBobbygo questioning why the vehicle cannot be sold as a private party in the state. The seller acknowledges the restrictions involved but does not elaborate on the reasons, which may leave some potential buyers confused or frustrated about the transaction process.
|
 |
Positive: @UPSROD expresses a strong preference for the Mineral White Metallic color, highlighting its superior aesthetic appeal compared to the Alpine White. @No_FOMO agrees, reinforcing that Mineral White better showcases the carbon fiber roof. @brianyoung supports the car's condition, stating it has been well maintained as an extra vehicle, emphasizing its fast and stock performance, suitable for buyers looking for an E92.
Neutral: @Sainter (The Seller) clarifies that the car is indeed Mineral White and not Alpine White, and that the color listing on the auction site is being corrected. They confirm that the rod bearings and throttle actuators are original, having received advice that replacements were unnecessary. Additionally, @Sainter indicates that the vehicle has Bluetooth for phone connectivity, but does not feature a backup camera, which was not an option for this model year.
Negative: @Yeezers raises concerns about a potential missing bolt on the rear sway bar end link and the age of the tires, questioning whether they would be replaced before the auction ends. @Mookie45 inquires about potential damage to the vehicle from parking incidents, citing specific pictures where the conditions looked concerning. @Yeezers also points out that there may be an issue with visibility related to the sway bar link in the recent photos, indicating a lack of clarity that may deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Mustang954 (The Seller) described the vehicle as a great car with no scratches or blemishes on the exterior and a well-maintained interior, apart from a few wrinkles on the driver's seat. They expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's performance, particularly noting the exciting response when the supercharger activates. The seller mentioned that they purchased the car as a fun driving experience and believe that potential buyers will love it as well.
Neutral: The seller highlighted the Saleen wheels, praising their excellent condition with no nicks or curb rash. They noted that the car is equipped with Toyo PROXES T1 Sport tires, which have very few miles on them, indicating that significant maintenance has been performed. Additionally, @Mustang954 (The Seller) mentioned the car’s insurance policy through Haggerty, costing around $400 per year, suggesting that this type of insurance provides good value for the vehicle's coverage.
Negative: However, @Mustang954 (The Seller) also pointed out that the car may not be comfortable for taller drivers, specifically mentioning that individuals over 6'2" could find themselves cramped. The seller shared a personal challenge, stating that due to arthritis, driving a manual car has become less enjoyable for them, implying that the age of the owner affects their experience with the vehicle. This concern may deter some potential buyers who prioritize comfort.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received enthusiastic praise from several commenters for its impressive power, with @Fredmiller noting that the Suzuki drive mode is "FAST …period !" and @BigT77 calling the bike "a beautiful Vixen with the heart of a rhino on steroids." @Dime and @junkman shared excitement about the bike's capabilities, with @Dime expressing curiosity about the experience it would bring. Many commenters highlighted the thrill of riding such a powerful machine, with @NVGT350 exclaiming, "Wow 300hp pure violence….El Diablo 😈" and @discoganya simply stating, "haha, this is insane."
Neutral: Commenters expressed curiosity and shared various concerns regarding the vehicle's specifications and usability. @BigGar raised the question of whether the bike can be registered in California, while @ChiPerf inquired about the shop that performed modifications. @ModenaOnMyMind humorously reflected on personal experiences with motorcycles, demonstrating awareness of the risks associated with such powerful machines. Additionally, @Fleche_dOr provided insights on the bike's performance and the potential maintenance considerations, mentioning the common durability of the Busa engine and presenting a hint of caution with their remarks on owning a high-powered motorcycle.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about the inherent dangers of such high-powered bikes. @Jags_in_the_barn described the 300hp as "just plain scary," and @KyleJ73 humorously mentioned how owning this bike could decrease his lifespan and increase life insurance premiums significantly. @proct1 posed a critical question about whether the fuel pump issue had been resolved, while @Bobroberto questioned the reasoning behind the bike's extreme specifications. Overall, while many expressed admiration for the bike, there was a clear acknowledgment of its potential risks among the respondents.
|
|
|