Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: @bbrs appreciates the appearance of the 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG Roadster, describing it as a great looking vehicle. @NewportSLS expresses excitement and anticipation, counting down the minutes until they can drive their own SLS Roadster, indicating a strong emotional connection to this model. The seller, @1600veloce, emphasizes their commitment to quality and customer service, highlighting their thorough listings and the vehicle's readiness for viewing in a climate-controlled facility.
Neutral: @1600veloce mentions that they are a highly active seller on BaT with over 2,100 listings and invites potential buyers to make appointments for viewing the SLS AMG Roadster. The seller provides detailed information on how to engage and offers options for trade-in or listing a car through their partner program. This indicates an established presence in the market and suggests that they are well-equipped to assist customers in the buying process.
Negative: @bbrs comments on the ownership history of the SLS AMG Roadster, noting that it has had five owners in twelve years, which some might find concerning for a car of this stature. This may raise questions about reliability or desirability among potential buyers, suggesting that the history of the vehicle could be a potential deterrent.
 |
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a lot of admiration and excitement from enthusiasts. @BrianS noted that it would fetch high prices due to its historical significance as a pioneer in the Bronco build trend. @Todd_Z shared fond memories of witnessing its construction and its significant presence at the Art Center show and SEMA, emphasizing how the 27,000 miles on the odometer reflect its drivability. Meanwhile, @boaboyoz described it as ''spectacular, stunning, historically pivotal, and cool AF,'' further underscoring the vehicle's unique value.
Neutral: Several comments also reflected on the vehicle's construction and specifications. @PetrolLounge (The Seller) confirmed the original MSRP of $201,265 and provided updates about service records being uploaded, which were well-received. @Hehfilwnw inquired about the appearance of mismatched doors and a brown substance observed under the truck, to which @PetrolLounge provided clarifications regarding the condition and nature of the issues raised.
Negative: Concerns were raised about some aspects of the vehicle's finish, with @Breezejammer noting that the satin spray might have caused visibility issues with the door colors. Additionally, @Hehfilwnw appeared worried about the brown substance under the vehicle and expressed curiosity about the ride quality and potential speed. @commonbiker questioned the vehicle's aerodynamics and fuel efficiency, suggesting it may not be the most economical choice, although @PetrolLounge indicated it might be better than past models.
|
 |
Positive: @Mrtiticus describes the vehicle as a "bumble bee beauty," while @PulseCheck enthusiastically shouts for the yellow GT with a "CAN I GET A HELL YEAH!" @Tomcat47 shares enthusiasm as well, noting the Heffner H-pipe on his car makes it sound awesome. @BigT77 admires the "serious venom" of the Bumble Bee and wishes good luck to bidders. @CJIIIFS appreciates the beauty of the Ford GT and also mentions the impressive collection of GTs in the background. @Hulk2000 and @ext further engage in the conversation regarding the rarity and collectibility of the color yellow, with @Pettyfan43 emphasizing its excellence as the perfect shade.
Neutral: Several commenters took a moment to discuss the car's state and history, like @Goinfaster, who expressed surprise at finding such a vehicle in Diboll, and @onepunch, who is glad to see a GT with mileage for a change. @Area51motors (The Seller) mentions an error in the Carfax report related to its mileage, addressing @BigT77's concerns and indicating a resolution is on the way. Commenters like @Ranchero65 and @manofmanuals share insights on pricing and care, aiming to keep the discussion factual as they compare details. @MACUSA jokingly remarks about the reliability of Carfax reports, highlighting the communal nature of discussions around these rare vehicles.
Negative: However, there are mixed feelings regarding the car's history, particularly its minor accident as noted by @badcad, indicating that it has had 7 owners and has undergone repairs. @AmericanMuscles humorously remarked about the stress around car accidents of supercars, while @MerlinsGarage reassured that quality repairs are not uncommon. The dispute over the valuation of such a rare car was highlighted by @Ranchero65 and @MHGT40, with @Ranchero questioning the assumption that it could fetch nearly $1 million, suggesting that recent sales have capped much lower. @Hulk2000 also highlighted skepticism around the accuracy of Carfax, prompting @BigT77's jab at the commenter's disbelief, showcasing a balance of optimism versus caution in discussions about this iconic vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Comments from users like @Number_Six express a sense of awe and excitement about the availability of a 1947 Volkswagen Beetle, which is described as a 'rare early Splitty.' Enthusiasts like @stevenvillatoro note that having this vehicle available brings joy, while @BisongHBA8 highlights it as a significant piece of history, produced only shortly after World War II. The seller, @BlueChipCar, emphasizes their commitment to providing a transparent and engaging auction experience, expressing gratitude towards the community's interest and shared passion.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @APLANTEDLEIF and @martenni, provide technical insights regarding the vehicle's build, pointing out discrepancies in its restoration compared to original specifications. They highlight aspects such as incorrect bumpers and inaccuracies in parts like the floor pans and seats, suggesting that while many changes could be corrected, they may require substantial investment. Commenters also note that discrepancies can be part of the vehicle's story, with @HarveyRanch emphasizing that the car's matching VIN and availability at auction make it notable regardless of these issues.
Negative: On the negative side, many commenters express disappointment over the restoration quality, with @Mordizzle and @martenni pointing out various flaws that undermine its authenticity, such as mismatched parts and construction techniques that appear subpar. Concerns are raised about the possibility of a front-end clip replacement and the appearance of less-than-ideal workmanship on areas like the wipers and wiring. Users like @Driven4more and @GlenK comment on the nitpicking culture, lamenting that some critiques overshadow the enthusiasm for such an iconic vehicle, while others like @MarkAAA emphasize the importance of finding accurate replacement parts to restore the car back to its original glory.
|
 |
Positive: @mhendrickson91 praises the car as possibly the cleanest 130k+ Spider they have seen, expressing a bit of buyer's remorse for their recent purchase. @WestsideCCS highlights the impressive condition of the Alfa Spider, attributing it to an incredibly fastidious owner who maintained it for 30 years. @kuratz testifies to the car's good performance, noting no unusual noises during test drives and describing it as well-presented, with the staff at WestsideCCS providing excellent service and documentation on repairs.
Neutral: @saanik asks about the car's reliability for long-distance driving and mentions that the air conditioning was confirmed as working well. @Ratedarrgh notes the lack of maintenance records but questions the presence of upgrades like new springs and shocks, suggesting that a full list of services performed would be helpful. @AlfistiNYC clarifies that any repairs on the nose of the car likely relate to minor dents rather than significant damage, reflecting a practical understanding of typical issues with older models.
Negative: @dansimoes raises concerns about the airbag system, recommending that it be disabled due to the age of the vehicle's safety features and emphasizes that no major leaks are present. @Tacnail questions the condition of the driver's side floor, implying that the vehicle may have experienced improper handling in the past. Additionally, @kuratz observes potential noise issues with the engine's pulley bearings, indicating that the car may need some attention despite its overall good condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the van and its capabilities. @mfontaine2008 called it an 'epic van' and shared their interest in transitioning to a Sprinter platform for their next vehicle after years of various camping rigs. @Sorendawg (The Seller) replied enthusiastically, citing their favorite road trip to Yosemite, reinforcing the van's adventurous spirit. The seller also provided detailed specifications about the layout, such as sleeping arrangements, heating systems, and additional features, which were appreciated by those asking questions about the van.
Neutral: Several questions were raised regarding practical aspects of the van, including storage dimensions, weight, and fuel economy. @OneOfEach asked about the size of water and gray water tanks, and @kurtlind1 inquired about the installation and positioning of solar panels. @Sorendawg (The Seller) responded clearly, providing measurements for sleeping arrangements and practical utilities in the van, such as the heated air conditioner and how long it can operate on battery power. Additionally, the seller encouraged interaction by offering to send more photos of specific parts of the van, demonstrating a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were noted regarding the vehicle's weight in relation to legal limits. @JM56 pointed out that the van's weight exceeds the Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) requirements in their state, making it illegal to operate on public roads. Even though @Jingo mentioned that the GVWR is below state limits in some areas, @JM56 elaborated on the implications of being over the limit and how it affects insurance. Furthermore, @kdowney1966 criticized the legibility of the window sticker included in the listing, highlighting possible frustrations with the information provided during the sale.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting its appeal as an electric conversion of a classic BMW 2002. @pizzaman09 mentioned that the combination of a manual transmission with a lightweight electric setup makes this model particularly interesting. @BigGar and @jduyan (The Seller) shared positive ownership experiences, describing the car as fun to drive and a great conversation starter. The vehicle's aesthetic was also praised, with comments like "Fantastic color!" by @mef0629, and people appreciated the nostalgic aspect paired with modern technology.
Neutral: There were several inquiries regarding technical specifications and functionality, showing a keen interest in understanding the EV conversion better. @frankflynn and @MCH asked about driving range and performance features, while @Getragwerk and @AUDIQFAN engaged in discussions about the unique aspects of driving an electric car, such as the lack of noise and intuitive gear shifting. The mixed feelings about the conversion were evident, with some commenters like @PhilNiekro acknowledging the personal preferences involved, balancing nostalgia for the original vehicle with the excitement about electric vehicles.
Negative: Concerns about the conversion were also raised, particularly about the reliability of certain features. @pappentl questioned the attention given to rust treatment during the conversion process, and @MercuryKG7H expressed disappointment at the lack of sound from the electric motor, which diminishes the traditional driving experience. Some users, like @Darren, remarked on the growing trend of EV conversions in classic cars, hinting at a critical or resistant audience. Moreover, @richski pointed out potential inaccuracies with the odometer, which could confuse potential buyers regarding the vehicle's history.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received high praise for its aesthetic and mechanical aspects. @JAY-Z highlights the car's excellent design and mentions that it features everything, including a striking Rangoon red color and impressive interior, which adds to the car's overall appeal. @GregP1962 agrees, appreciating the unique tint of the red. @Hoppy18 also compliments the car, calling it a beauty and expressing pride in owning it. Further, commenters like @WishfulThinker23 display enthusiasm for the auction, wishing the seller luck with the no reserve sale, while @Los86 (The Seller) boasts about the comprehensive refurbishment done on the vehicle, including the suspension and numerous components.
Neutral: Discussion surrounding the bonded title has been prevalent, with @stantman69 questioning the legality of selling a vehicle with such a title. @Los86 (The Seller) clarifies that the bond was established in 2021 to assure ownership and that potential buyers can apply for a regular title after three years. Various comments approach the bond issue from different angles, with @Rmsari asking for its purpose and the implications for potential buyers. Posted responses address concerns about the vehicle's registration and title transfer process, shedding light on the nuances of bonding in vehicle sales.
Negative: Concerns regarding the title have raised skepticism among potential bidders. @mauimaui questioned if the seller would consider putting the sale money in escrow until the title situation was resolved, indicating a desire for greater buyer security. @lilbiz75 pointed out the restrictions in Massachusetts related to bonded titles, warning that there could be complications in transferring to a clean title. Similarly, @EddieNap expressed doubt over the vehicle's condition due to heavy paint covering the undercarriage, prompting further scrutiny about repairs. The recurring focus on the title issues and a few apprehensive comments suggest potential buyers need assurances before pursuing bids.
|
 |
Positive: @VINTAGE_CARS_ONLINE expresses admiration for a 2008 GT500KR, calling it an amazing car. @NiceRumble exclaims that this vehicle is a true representation of a 'Unicorn,' indicating its rarity and desirability. @danceswithimports highlights that the seller is a meticulous enthusiast who cares deeply for his vehicles, giving potential bidders confidence in this listing. @Bavarianmasterpiece also notes the car's flawless condition, while @ADE1000 emphasizes its stunning presence and unmatched sound, calling it a well-documented 'American Masterpiece.'
Neutral: The seller, @Rayshipley, shares his personal journey with the GT500KR, detailing his excitement and the meticulous care taken since its purchase. He explains the vehicle's specifications, including its components and maintenance history. Multiple comments, such as those from @BigFrank and @Pete500600, inquire about specifics regarding the car's condition and upgrades, showing genuine interest. @WillowNC asks about the auction reserve and expresses eagerness to potentially purchase the car, indicating varying levels of engagement with the selling process.
Negative: There are some apprehensions from users such as @BigFrank, who raises concerns about the idler pulley and tire condition, showing a cautious approach towards the car’s maintenance. @bewildered makes a somewhat sardonic remark about the plaque on the car and the late Shelby, which could imply skepticism about the authenticity or value of limited production. While most comments are positive, these few reflect concerns or criticisms that might lead potential buyers to question certain aspects of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 described the vehicle as a beautiful Dark Baltic Blue Metallic Grand Wagoneer, which indicates an appreciation for its aesthetics. @Gregpryckman complimented the wood trim and center console replacement, calling it one of the best they have seen, while @GDogg echoed the sentiment by stating that the GW is absolutely gorgeous. @WagoneerFan noted the great matching interior color to the original. @99duelly added that the presentation was nice and praised the choice of wide white tires as period correct for the model.
Neutral: @etx-country0917 (The Seller) provided insights into the vehicle's history and condition, stating that the truck was fully restored in 2021 and has been well-maintained since then, with no significant issues noted beyond a hail claim in 2016. They confirmed that the A/C blows cold, the seats are vinyl, and the engine remains stock. The Seller has been proactive in addressing various inquiries, such as explaining the function of additional electronic components in the vehicle and outlining the truck's minimal towing and off-road use, confirming it to be primarily a city vehicle.
Negative: Some comments included concerns about specific features, like @lionsfan54 questioning a hanging plug near the passenger headlight, and @topher6315 remarking that the steering wheel cover does not look good. Additionally, @HTL2 brought up the absence of a receiver hitch, suggesting minimal towing activity and questioning the frequent alarms on these vehicles, which implies they could be stolen often. There was also a note from @Woodbubba regarding background noise in the driving video, suggesting possible mechanical issues, even though the Seller stated that any noises present were not of concern.
|
 |
Positive: @PassR (The Seller) assures the BAT community that the Coey is fully restored and ready for driving after adding fluids. They describe it as a rare and cute vehicle, measuring only 10 and a half feet long, and shared the excitement from the original engine restorer, noting the vehicle is 'scary FAST'. @JamesMcCaleb expressed appreciation for those who value and restore such unique pieces of automotive history, and @Adcoximports mentioned planning to buy it as a gift for a very old employee, which adds to its charm and significance.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed curiosity about the vehicle, including @Ranchero65 who noted the obscurity of the marque, indicating there are many forgotten carmakers from the past. @Sparrownaut shared historical insight on tire colors, adding context to the vehicle's time period. @TDR inquired about the functionality of the acetylene headlights and rear light, while @georgealbright showed interest in whether other examples of the vehicle exist, leading to further discussion about the rarity of the model.
Negative: On the more critical side, @RogueG remarked that any car not used for 13 years is inherently a project with unknowns, cautioning that it should be in roadable condition before being sold. @Joshua91197 expressed confusion, questioning whether the car truly works, which reflects the uncertainty some potential bidders may have regarding its usability. Furthermore, @RogueG noted the aged tires as a potential concern, and although @PassR acknowledged this, they emphasized the good condition of the gas tank and carburetor.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters express their admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic and performance. @Gmmuscleusa emphasizes the solid example of the car and praises its classic color combination of white with a blue bird. The 403 engine is mentioned as reliable and capable of good power, highlighting that this car offers a comfortable cruising experience. @AUTOINTEGRITY (The Seller) assures that the car is 'very clean' and runs perfectly, which adds to the positive sentiments. @MarkBartlett appreciates the reupholstered seats, suggesting that they are nicer than the original blue cloth.
Neutral: Commenters discuss the steering wheel issue with mixed sentiments, as it seems to have sparked quite a debate. @e9er appreciates the original factory steering wheel design, arguing its removal is unjustified, while others like @HBM0302 suggest alternatives for replacement, such as a Lecarra leather-wrapped wheel. The comments indicate that many are interested in the vehicle's authenticity and historical accuracy, as seen in discussions about the correct interior materials and steering wheels.
Negative: Several comments focus on criticism regarding the steering wheel replacement, with @Myclassicrides even suggesting extreme measures for the individual who replaced it, highlighting the significance of this feature to the car's identity. @BSer and @Supercruiser1968 express disappointment, agreeing that the original steering wheel enhances the car's value and aesthetic. Additionally, @Driven4more raises concerns about the vehicle potentially missing parts, and @TheClassicConnection questions the quality of the repaint, indicating possible concerns over the car's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its well-kept condition and the owner's meticulous care over the years. @Dantemax1121 emphasized the importance of transparency by disclosing imperfections in the Cayenne GTS's description, which reflects a commitment to honesty. @ForzaV12 noted their own experience with a similar model, praising it for running like new even at a high mileage of 180,000, suggesting that well-cared-for Cayenne SUVs have a long lifespan ahead of them.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding specific features and maintenance history, such as the trailer hitch setup and oil consumption. @TertreRouge and @bgracely both engaged in a discussion about the trailer hitch capabilities, agreeing on the wiring harness setup being similar to other vehicles. @Lesr3204 also inquired about the oil consumption and bore scoring, while @fa88 asked about the transmission servicing, reflecting a general curiosity about the vehicle's overall condition.
Negative: There were concerns raised about the maintenance history of the vehicle. @Dantemax1121 admitted that the transmission fluid and filter had not been changed, which is a deviation from recommended servicing practices. While he followed the owner's manual guidelines, he acknowledged not being aware of the recommendation to service it more frequently, suggesting it may not have been cared for as diligently as possible in that aspect.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the impressive power and aesthetics of the vehicle. @Bigenca notes that the truck has a lot of motor and is fun to drive while also commenting on its good looks. @ProfGriff appreciates the appearance of the C10 stepper and inquires about its powertrain, showcasing interest in its specifications which @RevOn_Auto responds to with detailed information about the engine and maintenance done prior to the install. Enthusiastic comments also include those from @boaboyoz, who describes the truck as 'magic' and compliments its killer build. @Tsf2010 gives a personal endorsement, having seen and driven the truck, affirming that it is a great driver. @072298jrw praises both its appearance and functionality, indicating it’s well put together without being overdone.
Neutral: The seller, @RevOn_Auto, provides a thorough commentary about the truck, sharing its specifications and elaborating on the maintenance and parts replaced before installation of the powertrain, which indicates transparency and willingness to engage with potential buyers. There are also responses to questions regarding features like the heat and AC, where @Big_Injun cleverly suggests that the truck is cool enough to not require AC. @Andrew1424 raises a valid point about an initial noise heard before engine startup; @RevOn_Auto explains it was just the electric fuel pump priming, demonstrating attentiveness to inquiries.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns or inquiries about specific details of the truck. @Oldschool16 questions the rationale behind relocating the battery to the bed, which suggests some skepticism about the build choices. @mduel86 seeks clarity on the engine's modifications and performance upgrades, hinting at a desire for assurance about the vehicle's capabilities. The sentiment from @Bigenca reveals a feeling of resignation as he acknowledges the truck's escalating bids, indicating it may surpass his budget, paired with a sense of disappointment as he balances personal commitments. Additionally, comments about the heat and AC indicate a desire for more comfort options, possibly reflecting a critique on what could be seen as a lack of modern amenities.
|
 |
Positive: @VantageAuto describes the 2009 Mercedes CLK350 as a stunning vehicle and one of the best examples of its kind available. The seller emphasizes the car's excellent condition, supported by a thorough inspection from Wolfgang’s Mercedes Repair, which revealed just a few minor issues, all addressed prior to sale. @Westwoodbob, a satisfied owner of the same model, expresses excitement about the car, noting that someone will certainly appreciate its value.
Neutral: Several questions from buyers are noted, with @jdndnlk inquiring about Bluetooth capabilities and @Smirk-Giggle asking about a factory-installed backup camera. Both aspects are clarified by @VantageAuto, highlighting that while the car lacks Bluetooth integration, a dongle can be added without trouble. Additionally, while @LeeThePilot points out the age of the tires, @VantageAuto confirms that they are indeed old but still serviceable, expressing confidence in the vehicle's smooth performance.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by potential buyers regarding the car's cosmetic details. @QuasarTR mentions noticing a scratch and dent on the rear quarter panel and seeks confirmation about further paint issues. @VantageAuto acknowledges that there is a small touched-up mark and offers the option for refinishing if desired. The age of the tires also raises some eyebrows, with @LeeThePilot pointing out that they could be as old as 14 years, prompting a response from @VantageAuto that they prefer not to change tires unless necessary.
|
 |
Positive: @Jimmyblues1959 commented on the vehicle saying it's a very nice CR-V, indicating a positive impression. @DatsunZGuy echoed this with a similar remark, adding humor about the picnic table included with the sale. Other buyers expressed their enthusiasm for the low mileage and overall condition of the car, with comments like @91crxtacy noting its potential for long-term use trouble-free compared to new models.
Neutral: @aSingh39 (The Seller) provided thorough descriptions of the vehicle, assuring prospective buyers about its low mileage and recent servicing. He also engaged with potential buyers by answering their inquiries regarding vehicle features, stating that the AC and other accessories work fine and that he would provide necessary documentation for title transfer if needed. Additionally, responses regarding the non-smoking condition and lack of odors were reassuring for buyers who were concerned about that aspect.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by @Rumbling regarding the absence of valve caps on the tires, which he considered important for maintenance. He expressed that this oversight might reflect poorly on the sale. Additionally, @best-stuff made inquiries about the vehicle's accessory functionality, hinting at potential doubts about its operational condition, while @JPC1969 sought service records, implying a desire for more transparency on previous vehicle maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: @ssclassic praises the vehicle for its magnificent design, craftsmanship, and elegance, referring to it as a beautiful automobile from a bygone era. They emphasize the importance of proper vetting and documentation when considering a purchase, suggesting that buyers should be aware of repair and maintenance costs. Overall, @ssclassic seems to appreciate the vehicle's iconic status and recommends it to potential buyers, wishing them good luck with their acquisition.
Neutral: @Rahtok provides insight into the audio equipment of the vehicle, noting that it is rare to see the original audio setup still intact. They mention that the Long Wheelbase (LWB) units of the car offer more passenger space, which is a positive aspect for those considering ownership. However, they also give a word of caution about the potential for leaks in the rear window due to older seals and advise checking for rust if the car hasn't been well cared for, striking a balance between appreciation and practical considerations for prospective buyers.
Negative: @nashville_roller's comment has been flagged as non-constructive, indicating some negativity towards the discussion or the vehicle without providing substantial feedback. @majorstanton expresses a desire to know how many miles the vehicle has been driven in the last year, which could suggest concern regarding its usage or condition. Although not explicitly negative, these comments highlight a potential skepticism around the vehicle's value or history.
|
Original-Owner 2007 Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD WT Dually Dump Truck
1GBJC34KX7E582764
Lot 222606
Private Party
 |
Positive: @ClapOrama157 mentioned that the truck looks nice and expressed a wish it was closer, indicating a level of interest and appreciation for the vehicle. @56Phil (The Seller) provided detailed information regarding the truck's specifications, including that it has always passed smog tests, which is a positive sign for potential buyers concerned about emissions compliance.
Neutral: @bobwop inquired about the empty weight of the vehicle and its capability to handle heavy loads with the electric pump, showing that there is an interest in the truck's specifications rather than a definitive opinion on its quality. @JakeAin asked about the towing capacity and 4x4 confirmation, similarly focusing on functional specifications of the vehicle without any apparent bias.
Negative: @windnsea00 expressed surprise that the original engine lasted only to 168,000 miles, potentially raising concerns about the vehicle's reliability and longevity. Additionally, @ClapOrama157 pointed out discrepancies regarding the vehicle's original classification as a 'dually pick up' and suggested it may have been modified, which could indicate concerns about the vehicle's integrity or history.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its appeal as a V10 Viper Coupe, which is increasingly rare. @banterman mentions that the future owner will be fortunate, advising proper care to maximize its performance. @msilvia points out the car's interesting history and potential as either a driver or a track car, which adds to its charm and desirability.
Neutral: Several comments provide context about the car's condition and history. @Shawnkey notes the modifications and repairs made in the past, including the installation of a roll bar and brake upgrades after an engine overhaul. Furthermore, @RyanWalters (The Seller) assures potential buyers that the exhaust issue raised by @EVOD1 was due to a loose hanger, which was fixed, and invites interested parties to inspect the vehicle firsthand.
Negative: Despite the general interest, some concerns about the vehicle's condition are discussed. @poacher questions the reason behind the rebuild and roll bar additions, implying the car may have been mistreated. There is also skepticism highlighted by @Shawnkey, who notes that the seller's limited experience with the car creates uncertainty regarding its value. @BigT77 refers to negative comments as 'haters,' suggesting that some critiques are unfounded but acknowledges that there are legitimate concerns about the car's history.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received high praise for its stunning aesthetics and the picturesque setting in which it is presented. @breezybrae commented positively, expressing love for the pictures, while @timberframe and @wwwpcs echoed similar sentiments by calling the truck beautiful. @wmainguy also highlighted the exceptional location and photography, suggesting they enhanced the truck's appeal. @Ypss36 added to the enthusiasm by describing it as a terrific truck and a prime candidate for original upgrades, further emphasizing its desirability.
Neutral: @Bassgde1 inquired about the logistics of importing the truck into the United States, showing that potential buyers are interested in the practicality of ownership. @RobLibera (The Seller) responded reassuringly, stating that all import details would be handled at no cost and offered assistance with shipping. Additionally, @mntlbtkm raised practical questions about the truck's operational status, including whether there were oil leaks and requested videos of the truck starting and being driven, showcasing a buyer's desire for assurance before making a purchase decision.
Negative: On the other hand, there were hints of disappointment among some commenters regarding financial limitations. @Mike5050 expressed a nostalgic desire to buy the truck as a Christmas gift for his late father-in-law, while @DanielWebber shared a similar sentiment, wishing he could afford to purchase the truck despite financial constraints. This reflects the emotional connection some individuals feel towards the vehicle, juxtaposed with their inability to acquire it.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express an enthusiasm for the 2004 Porsche 911 C4S, highlighting its appealing design and driving experience. @convertparts shares their positive ownership experience, stating they enjoy long drives and appreciate the supportive seats and the car's exhaust note. The comment about the vehicle's aesthetic, specifically its 'best looking 911 Rump', reflects a strong admiration for the car's appearance. Additionally, @BlueChipCar (The Seller) encourages participants to ask questions and offers extensive support throughout the auction, indicating confidence in the vehicle's quality and desirability.
Neutral: Several commenters, such as @SoGi and @CFio, inquired about the car's history and maintenance records. Their questions revolve around the previous ownership and the reasons for the car's quick resale, sparking curiosity but not doubt about the vehicle's reliability. The seller, @BlueChipCar, responds that they have an extensive list of recorded maintenance history available, alleviating some concerns while the request for driving videos and service records suggests a thorough vetting process by potential buyers.
Negative: Some commenters raised specific concerns regarding the vehicle's technical details, such as @Doc_Z asking about IMS and RMS inspections, and @slickshift questioning the availability of service records and whether the IMS is original. @RacerRick pointed out the lack of comments regarding the IMS replacement since the last sale, hinting at possible issues with the vehicle. Additionally, @bigdogandy noted the unusual nature of having a reserve auction following a previously no-reserve auction, which could indicate uncertainty around the car's value.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters like @gf2020, @MiloWeb7, and @ZZZZZZZ praise the vehicle for its cleanliness and condition despite its mileage, highlighting the well-maintained state of the car. @ZZZZZZZ notes it appears to be a one-owner car with a late build date, recommending it as one of the best examples in its class. @CPT_5LOW appreciates its rarity and beauty, suggesting that the seller will miss it as it seems to be a beloved vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the car's functionality and history. @P2VR4life and @DJLupfer (The Seller) engage in discussions about features like the radio and the extent of damage from a previous crash. Some commenters express interest in inspecting the vehicle, with @DJLupfer facilitating arrangements for viewings and providing details about the condition and parts like the snow tires that can be included.
Negative: Comments reflecting concerns include @flip2821's inquiry about potential corrosion from winter usage and @LindenR's mention of potential overlook due to mileage, automatic transmission, and color. Additionally, comments about the radio functionality highlight a low point, with some considering that feature disappointing for its age and the need for future replacements.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciated the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, highlighting features like the Blk/Palomino color combination and the low mileage, which suggests it's a pristine example. @Royall66 expressed hope that the new owner would create joyful memories with the coupe, reinforcing its status as a beloved family car. Additionally, @HDWalt mentioned that being a Colorado vehicle for an extended period adds to its value, indicating that the environment may have preserved it well.
Neutral: Several comments focused on specific details and the overall condition of the vehicle. @Hulk2000 inquired about any potential issues aside from the air conditioning, prompting a detailed response from @CODYBRO (The Seller) about the vehicle's maintenance and condition. @lilcarlover raised concerns about the oil change frequency and the air conditioning's performance, seeking clarification on whether the system underwent a dye or smoke test for leaks. The seller provided thorough feedback, noting that oil changes were infrequent but had occurred since 2013, which is significant given the car's limited use.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding the vehicle's air conditioning system, with @tpence highlighting that fixing it would be crucial for potential buyers. @Cedesguy provided a stark warning about the potential long-term issues with the vehicle's A/C system, which may require significant repairs if not addressed. Additionally, @lilcarlover questioned the history of the airbag replacement, expressing anxiety about the reasons behind it, which added to the sense of caution among some commenters regarding the vehicle's overall reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the 2001 Tacoma being sold, highlighting its low mileage, solid build, and well-maintained condition. @TacomaLX (The Seller) notes it has been one owner and emphasizes the effectiveness of the original Toyota undercoating that has helped preserve the frame over the years. @KZN185Surf expressed gratitude for the previous owner's rust prevention efforts and stated they closely follow the listings, showcasing a positive interest in the truck's history and condition. @joeymach and others appreciate the attention to detail in the listing, including countless photos and videos which showcase the truck’s features and quality.
Neutral: The discussion also includes some inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and maintenance history. @southofhell asked if the timing belt had been replaced, and @Stethilk inquired about the truck bed size. @richnsx raised questions about the vehicle's ownership and its registration history, to which @TacomaLX (The Seller) provided clarifications, explaining that the truck was purchased new in NY but primarily lived in NJ, confirming its single-owner status. Overall, these interactions indicate a level of curiosity about the Tacoma's specifics and ongoing clarification from the seller without any glaring concerns raised.
Negative: There are mixed sentiments regarding the vehicle's past incidents. @VWmurf53 expressed concern about a deployed airbag, questioning if it indicated the vehicle was a salvage or rebuilt title, which prompted a defensive response from @TacomaLX (The Seller), who reassured potential buyers about the condition and integrity of the truck. @HighRoller499 echoed similar concerns, stating that a deployed airbag could be a significant red flag for potential buyers. However, @joeymach countered that this information is relevant to the truck's age and fit for sale. This dialogue reflects a level of skepticism among some potential buyers about the truck's past and its implications for future ownership.
|
 |
Positive: @RecoveringAtty shared that the exhaust video features "beautiful music," indicating a pleasing auditory experience from the vehicle. @Quadfinger expressed admiration, reminiscing about restoring a similar 1968 convertible, calling it a "beauty" while wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @Bigenca marked the vehicle as having the "sexiest body lines of any car ever," showcasing a strong appreciation for its design, and @Chefgordiemac noted it as a "really, really nice C3," further endorsing its aesthetics. The seller, @missmyF4302023, received compliments about the car, with several commenters taking selfies with it and expressing that they liked the look of the luggage rack, pointing to an overall positive reception of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification and more information about the vehicle. @Dnnaples inquired about the original exterior and interior colors, while @Bosticsic asked if any remnant of the original color was available in the trunk or underbody. @AmericanMuscle9 queried the lack of air conditioning in Arizona, speculating it might be a reason for the sale. @Matt93 raised a concern about another listing on Craigslist, noting that the same car seemed to be advertised there, prompting the seller to clarify their ownership timeline. Additionally, @Blofish and @Tubman2025 discussed details about the gill inserts, highlighting the car's features and design.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns or criticisms regarding the vehicle's condition and features. @Calstickshift and @Noisyboyz both expressed disapproval of the luggage rack, with @Noisyboyz mentioning it could leave holes after removal that would need to be filled. @Mkk1 pointed out a paint imperfection in one of the pictures, sparking questions about the blemish's location. @CharlieK911 lamented the presence of non-original elements like the '69 "Stingray" callouts, commenting on it alongside the luggage rack. Furthermore, @missmyF4302023 reacted to criticism regarding the luggage rack, recognizing mixed opinions about its looks while also addressing the bid flake as a frustrating experience that many sellers face.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express appreciation for the vehicle's overall condition and features. @MJLMotorcars highlights that the 2017 Range Rover Supercharged is very clean and has low mileage, with only 39k miles. Its impressive options include the Vision Assist Package and Drive Pro Package, which enhance safety and driving convenience with features like adaptive xenon headlights, lane keep assist, and a surround camera system. Commenters noted the appealing aesthetics of the car, such as its Fuji White color and Narvik Black roof, along with luxurious interior details like heated and ventilated seats and high-quality audio.
Neutral: Clarifications about the vehicle's specific features were discussed among commenters. @Complete inquired about the massage seats, and @MJLMotorcars confirmed that while there are heated and ventilated front seats and heated rear seats, massage seats are not included. In terms of vehicle configurations, @ripper996 wanted to know about the length and received confirmation from @MJLMotorcars that it was a short wheelbase (SWB), reiterating that the vehicle comes loaded with factory options valued around $15k.
Negative: A few comments indicated minor communication issues. @Ponzitrader's comment was flagged as non-constructive, suggesting some contention or dissatisfaction with the discussions taking place. Additionally, @MJLMotorcars mentioned difficulties in responding to @Jermonmao due to email provider issues, which might lead to frustration for potential buyers waiting for replies. This could impact the buying experience slightly, as timely communication is important during the auction process.
|
 |
Positive: @cwood13 described the vehicle as the most awesome car on BaT, proclaiming it a standout choice. @GLTL noted the high level of ingenuity involved in its construction, expressing hope for it to gain significant attention on the platform. @HookedonBAT added to the enjoyment factor, reminiscing about how fun these vehicles are to drive, especially on the autocross track. @Profcarnut praised the unique build quality and described its appearance as both gritty and appealing, while @mettelman fantasized about showcasing such a car at prestigious events, illustrating its thrilling potential.
Neutral: Comments from @M6Noah and @bakes88 sought specifics on the vehicle's paint condition and performance metrics, indicating interest from a practical standpoint. @darkostoj, the seller and builder, shared insights about the vehicle's development process and significant modifications made, including a focus on modern electronics and safety features. The seller also acknowledged previous racing experiences and adjustments made for racing series, confirming that the car has indeed participated in 24 Hours of LeMons races and was classified for lack of penalty laps.
Negative: A few comments hinted at concerns, such as @usdcrs wondering about the functionality of the air conditioning system and and @TeeRev expressing nostalgia for previous BaT iterations. @onlyhonda4me painted a light-hearted picture of a questionable home modification that led to an unexpected result. Overall, while the comments were primarily expansive in praise or curiosity, worries about practical aspects and the car's history provided a more cautious perspective.
|
 |
Positive: @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) describes the 2002 SL500 Silver Arrow as a well-cared-for vehicle that runs and drives great. The seller highlights recent maintenance, specifically the replacement of the soft-top hydraulics, ensuring it operates like new. They express confidence in the vehicle's condition, inviting bidders to participate in the auction with assurance.
Neutral: Commenters seek clarity on the vehicle's features, with @nnp007 asking about the center dash console cover's condition, which @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) confirms does not sit flush. Additionally, @onebadrover inquires about the functioning of the heat/AC and other possible needs of the vehicle. @LancerCC requests a better photo of the center console due to potential cracks or sun damage, which @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) later acknowledges with appreciation for additional photos.
Negative: Some potential buyers express concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @kgishere questions if anything aside from the front bumper has been repainted, indicating a concern for the authenticity of the vehicle's exterior. @onebadrover and @LancerCC also point out issues that may affect the vehicle's performance and appearance, which raises doubts about its overall upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: @amotorsports describes the BMW M8 as a personal vehicle that is in excellent condition with low miles and has been well maintained. The car features a perfect mix of comfort and performance, making it a joy to drive. Commenters such as @HELIDR appreciate its striking 'evil-looking' aesthetics, stating it is undoubtedly an amazing car. Additionally, @chrisawolff considers it one of the last truly desirable vehicles from BMW, emphasizing its timeless appeal and sharp design.
Neutral: @amotorsports confirms that the car is a non-smoker with a clean title, addressing inquiries from potential bidders regarding its background. The seller has taken care of the vehicle, recently completing a ceramic coating for added protection. Commenters like @MrCas and @Rob_W raise logistical questions about the auction's reserve status and inquire about specific aspects of the vehicle, such as oil consumption and any potential damage, which @amotorsports readily clarifies.
Negative: Some comments reflect a divergence in opinion, with @TomSgarlata expressing disappointment over the M8's styling compared to previous models, stating it won't hold iconic status. Additionally, @Rob_W questions the condition of the B pillar and rear bumper paint, suggesting potential issues, while @chrisawolff seeks assurance about oil consumption and other factors. Overall, while the vehicle has many strengths, there are noticeable concerns that some commenters feel need addressing.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally praised the vehicle for its condition and overall aesthetics. @aus92 described it as a 'beautiful truck' and @carchasers (The Seller) highlighted its amazing appearance both in daylight and at night, noting the striking Cabernet red color. They also emphasized the originality and completeness of the truck, including features like the original window sticker and books, which adds value for collectors or enthusiasts. The truck's low mileage of just under 75k miles was also a point of admiration, indicating that it has been well-preserved over the years.
Neutral: Inquiries about the vehicle focused on specific features and details, reflecting potential buyers' interest in getting a comprehensive understanding before bidding. For instance, @ashmanfish asked about the number of fuel tanks and any other mechanical issues, while @skbid wanted to know the specific transmission type. @Jobu611 requested additional photos to check areas prone to rust, like the drip rails, indicating a desire to fully assess the truck's condition.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding its functionality. @ashmanfish pointed out the non-functional air conditioning system, questioning whether there were other mechanical issues to be aware of. @carchasers (The Seller) confirmed that the A/C required R12 freon and mentioned the challenges of finding someone to recharge it due to local regulations, which might discourage some potential buyers. Additionally, the request for additional pictures by @Jobu611 suggests that some aspects of the truck's condition might need clearer documentation to alleviate concerns.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its rarity and excellent condition, with many enthusiasts expressing admiration for its low mileage, unique color (reef blue), and overall aesthetic. @Z282SLO emphasized the opportunity to own a practically brand new GT convertible from 1993, while @BlownV8 suggested that a low-mile beauty like this could easily be a winner at car shows due to its exceptional condition. Many pointed out the appeal of the car being undercoated for preservation, viewing it as a smart move to maintain the vehicle's integrity over the years, as noted by @DKeng and @ModernClassicNJ.
Neutral: Several comments also engaged in technical discussions about the vehicle's specifications, including the horsepower and torque figures, and were open-minded about the undercoating applied to the car. Commenters like @MechaTex provided insights into the changes in SAE testing methods over the years, which contribute to the confusion around the vehicle's specifications. @Mrdeal and others contemplated the mechanical services the vehicle might need for future use, which indicated a balanced view of the vehicle being both a collector's item and a possible daily driver.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters articulated concerns about the decision to undercoat a vehicle of this significance, suggesting that it could potentially indicate something was being hidden, as highlighted by @masterqi and @CarsToys. There were thoughts that this car should be kept for display rather than driven, with @btocco13 asserting that such collectible vehicles are better suited for museums. The discussion involved skepticism regarding the potential need for restoration and the significance of preserving such a low-mileage classic, which sparked debate among commenters about the appropriate use of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Several commentators expressed a positive view of the vehicle. @LandSpeedster described the car as 'SEXY,' while @macroni appreciated that this 964 Speedster is a model that enthusiasts could buy and actually drive. @L1V1C regarded the car as a 'cool platform' meant for enjoying on nice days, suggesting it would be fun to own. @h_bakken considered the initially criticized video as the 'best video evah,' indicating that despite the negatives, some found value in the seller's efforts.
Neutral: A number of comments focused on questions and clarifications about the vehicle's condition and history without strong positive or negative tones. @Scothania inquired about the reasons for the video's poor quality and expressed uncertainty about why a half-completed video was shown. @Dwc930 highlighted concerns about inconsistencies in the mileage records, asking for clarification regarding ownership and odometer readings. The seller, @coolspeedsters, addressed various issues raised by commenters, including questions about video quality and vehicle history, attempting to provide transparency about the car's background and current state.
Negative: There were several critical comments regarding the vehicle, particularly focused on the misleading quality of the video and potential discrepancies in mileage records. @nucleonic commented on the poor quality of the video, suggesting it could do more harm than good and criticizing the narration. @KHJ condemned what they referred to as 'car sale malpractice,' indicating a serious lack of trust. Concerns about a possible odometer rollback were raised by @JAY-Z and @Scuderia1, which were echoed in various comments. Additionally, @IrishWhiskey criticized the lack of adequate photos of the car in different configurations, emphasizing that serious buyers want comprehensive visuals to assess the vehicle thoroughly.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's condition, with @stg83 noting it looks like a "brand new 23yr old Vette" and appreciating its color and manual transmission. @TV_Casualty also highlighted the car's excellent configuration and condition. The seller, @Prescott_Collection, assured the audience that the car is in "factory fresh" condition and has had a careful owner, who is a collector. The recent outside photos further enhanced the perception of its beauty, leading @Noisyboyz to appreciate the better representation of the car's true state in natural light.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed the car's mileage and previous ownership without strong opinions. @Duckhook50 pointed out that the Z06 models came only with a manual transmission, while @fiveomar shared insight on the best years for the C5 Z06. The seller, @Prescott_Collection, mentioned plans to offer driving videos and cold start demonstrations. @Tobyallen expressed concern about the lighting in photos, suggesting it negatively affected the perception of the car's condition and calling for more realistic images.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the photography quality, as comments from @ls1auto and @TrueNewb criticized the clarity and misleading saturation of the images. @PopPop62 brought up a concern about the driver's seat creasing inconsistent with the reported low mileage, leading to speculation among commenters about the car's usage. @Prokill1 and @FoxJohnFox debated the extent of wear on the seats, with suggestions that it might indicate more frequent use than the mileage suggests. @Tobyallen pointed out a trend of seller photos being manipulated and questioned their authenticity, emphasizing the need for transparency in vehicle presentation.
|
 |
Positive: @campodf noted the Cayenne's nice appearance, while @InspectorSeb praised the unique Moonlight Blue color. There were also comments about the Premium Package Plus, particularly appreciated for its added features, including the LED headlights, which some like @CarbonM felt were a great choice for aesthetics. Additionally, @VantageAuto (The Seller) provided details about the vehicle's overall excellent condition, asserting that it runs perfectly and features a well-maintained interior without any unpleasant odors.
Neutral: Several users raised questions on the vehicle's specifics, such as @bmdaia expressing a preference against aftermarket wheels despite liking the color. Inquiries regarding the missing plastic engine bay trim and the missing fuse panel cover were made by multiple individuals, including @Weight4Me and @panda_roo, with the seller addressing these concerns directly and clarifying that some components were not provided with the vehicle. The state of the CV boot was another point of discussion, with users including @SanJuaner and @dwib44 asking if replacements would be necessary; @VantageAuto confirmed that they plan to replace it before sale.
Negative: However, concerns about the vehicle's condition were raised by @g958, who detailed several issues including a torn CV boot and damaged components in the front suspension. @spyderdoc highlighted the discrepancy between the listed xenon headlights and their actual LED equivalents, with further reviews indicating they may be aftermarket, which also added confusion regarding reliability and potential costs for the next owner. Furthermore, there was skepticism about emissions compliance for potential buyers in California, as mentioned by @riskyone and @kuratz, raising fears about the costs involved to meet local regulations.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praised the vehicle, calling it a 'Very nice C240', while @MistahDAV shared his personal experience with a similar model, noting the flawlessly functioning powertrain and adequate power combined with great highway mileage. @4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) engaged with commenters by providing detailed responses, confirming features like the rear window shade and the car's ice-cold air conditioning. The Seller also mentioned that the car would receive a replacement set of tires and would be smogged for California buyers, adding further value and assurance to potential buyers.
Neutral: Some commenters raised practical questions about the car's condition and history, such as @fitito inquiring about the rear window shade and @george297 asking for details about the air conditioning system and tire conditions. @abc12345 sought service history and confirmation of completed recall items, while others like @mlowengrub and @Mizo1 requested updates on tire date codes and smog certification. @EdCar expressed interest in the option of in-person pickup, reflecting a desire to ensure a smooth transaction process.
Negative: Concerns were also voiced, as @abc12345 asked about necessary repairs regarding critical components like rotors and sensors. @MistahDAV mentioned that although the powertrain is strong, the interior and electrical components might not measure up to expectations, suggesting some disappointment in the overall quality. Additionally, @Mizo1 suggested the need for a video demonstrating that safety functions work properly, indicating that they felt uncertain about some aspects of the vehicle's functionality.
|
 |
Positive: @Blizzard340 finds the vehicle super cool while @Collins4A appreciates its simple design with a centrifugal clutch and no transmission. @Greasegunner expresses nostalgia, saying it brings back memories from the late 60s and that he can hear the clutch engaging even now. @BigT77 reflects on the fun he had with similar vehicles, mentioning swapping rides with friends. @247BB has had good experiences with the seller, praising him as a stand-up guy with impeccable work. @Jimmycool (The Seller) thanks the commenters for their kind words and offers assistance with shipping or pickup arrangements, inviting everyone to ask questions. @Gwhitemisled describes the bike as beautiful and mentions the distance involved in bringing it home.
Neutral: Comments from users like @rkjjeep indicate a shared history with the same model as a significant introduction to motorcycling. @acemobilesrq reminisces about working on similar bikes with his grandpa and reflects on the importance of teaching kids skills in the garage. @RiffRaff and @Johnnycab engage in a light conversation about frame kits available on the market, with @RiffRaff wishing they could still find them easily.
Negative: There are no negative comments about the vehicle, as all remarks are primarily positive or neutral, focusing on the nostalgia and enjoyment associated with it. The atmosphere in the thread is supportive, and users do not express any dissatisfaction or concerns about the bike.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the bike's overall appeal and character. @MonteCutlass described the bike as 'nice' and appreciated how it was presented, suggesting it fits his tastes. @RickonaDeuce noted the bike is 'fun to ride', which speaks to its performance and enjoyment factor. @Troutspey shared a personal connection, mentioning he owns the same model and color, and praised its classic status. Commenters like @MrMike2 also found it nostalgic, highlighting the beauty of vintage Honda bikes, which adds to the bike's charm in the auction.
Neutral: Several users raised practical questions about the bike's condition and history. @dzguy inquired about the specifics of the engine overhaul and supporting documentation, while @kingair350 pointed out signs of wear that might imply the restoration was not as recent as claimed. Comments regarding the legality of the bike's features, such as the absence of turn signals, were explained by both @Mduffm and @PaThumper, clarifying the standards for a model from that era without being overly critical.
Negative: Some comments included concerns regarding the bike's condition and restoration details. @kingair350 specifically mentioned signs of wear that suggested the bike might not have been recently restored, and he provided comparisons to other bikes that showed less deterioration. Others, like @Prefurbia, questioned the state of the CAM chain and its components during the engine rebuild. There was also a hint of confusion about ownership and bidding processes, as @Yenko1 sought clarity on the seller's relationship with the bike, indicating potential issues with transparency that might deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @1stgenfan (The Seller) presents a 1993 Dodge W250 that boasts only 52,000 Carfax-verified miles, highlighting that it has remained in the same family since new. The seller appreciates the truck's original condition, noting no bodywork or rust repair was required and that it received a high-quality repaint to address Colorado sun fade. They emphasize the excellent state of the interior and mechanical components, asserting that the truck runs and drives like one with low mileage should. Many commenters express admiration for the truck, calling it a beautiful machine and a beast of a rig.
Neutral: Several users inquire about specific aspects of the truck. @96Cruiser questions whether one or both batteries were replaced, to which @1stgenfan (The Seller) clarifies that only the single factory battery was replaced. @SAULICK expresses interest in inspecting the truck in person, and @Lubedude1 asks about the KDP retainer, which the seller cannot confirm if it has been addressed. The seller responds to questions promptly, indicating a willingness to provide additional information and facilitate in-person inspections.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, some concerns regarding potential issues are raised. @Lubedude1 mentions a past experience with KDP failure and expresses a desire to address this if they were to acquire the truck. @Eric_E. points out an oversight about the wire retainer that was not removed from the shock absorber during shipping, possibly indicating a lack of attention to detail. The seller acknowledges the importance of addressing preventive maintenance like the KDP issues for peace of mind, thus not denying the potential risks associated with these older trucks.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors generally express admiration for the vehicle's performance and aesthetics. @Chuchip describes it as 'pure fun' and 'just perfect,' highlighting its enjoyable nature. @Dimitri2004, a current owner, praises the G80 M3 as one of the best iterations of the model, suggesting that the new owner will be impressed by its quality. Additionally, @bbrs finds the M3 good-looking, albeit with mixed feelings about the grill and color, indicating a degree of appreciation despite some reservations.
Neutral: There are discussions regarding the logistics of the sale due to the existing lien on the vehicle. @Kabir09 (The Seller) clarifies that the lien does not affect the sale price, stating that there is substantial equity in the vehicle. He also explains the purchase process, emphasizing that the lien will be paid off before the title is transferred, addressing inquiries from commentors such as @sy1616 and @elk96003 about the financing and timing involved in the transaction.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about potential issues with the vehicle, particularly regarding its performance on cold starts. @julmar54 inquires whether a rough idle issue has been addressed, prompting further questions from @elk96003 about the specifics of this performance concern. @sy1616 points out a misunderstanding in communication about the lien, suggesting some confusion among commentors regarding the buying process. Additionally, @bbrs expresses mixed feelings about the M3's design, indicating that while they find the car visually appealing, they struggle to appreciate every aspect of its appearance.
|
 |
Positive: @caymanandwent mentioned that the vehicle drove faster than the speed of light, which emphasizes its impressive performance. @Valhalla083 (The Seller) noted the car is a product of a father-son project that took over seven years, highlighting the care and dedication put into its restoration. The car has a unique story and sentimental value, making it appealing to potential buyers.
Neutral: A discussion about the vehicle's specifications revealed that @Valhalla083 (The Seller) listed 3.54 gears and confirmed the car has never been tracked in its current configuration. There were inquiries about specific pictures, particularly regarding picture 62 and the location of the added fuel tank. @Valhalla083 (The Seller) provided details on the restoration process and answered questions regarding certain features, suggesting an openness to clarify any misunderstandings.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition were raised by @Moparmanbet, who questioned a potential rust hole in the frame shown in picture 95. There was also a request for a cold start video which @Valhalla083 (The Seller) initially did not have, though he promised to upload one eventually. Overall, while the car is appreciated in many aspects, its condition and some missing documentation have caused some skepticism.
|
 |
Positive: @jturner described the vehicle as 'superb!' and praised the overall craftsmanship, noting it's a well-done 'A' with attention to detail. @petefitzgibbons and @Ferndinand expressed admiration for the aesthetics, with @petefitzgibbons calling it a beauty and @Ferndinand highlighting its resemblance to an XK 120. @Miatadon remarked on the high-quality restoration, indicating it must have been costly, suggesting that experts would approve of the work done. @Mgrescueguy added that the restoration was unusually nice and praised the seller for transparency in showcasing the car's condition through photos.
Neutral: @albuz3 inquired about the steering wheel size and radio functionality, to which @jw56mga (The Seller) responded with details about the steering wheel diameter and the radio condition. Questions about the vehicle's original parts also came from @rjr59AH, who asked about the original steering wheel and steel wheels, and @gojoe123, who was concerned about potential tire rubbing on the wheel well liners. In response, @jw56mga confirmed the steel wheels' condition and assured there was no rubbing at all. @hueyhoolihan provided information regarding the tire specifications for the vehicle, relating it to similar vehicles of the era.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @albuz3 regarding the unrepaired paint damage on the door, questioning if it was a simple issue or indicative of underlying problems. @jw56mga (The Seller) explained that the damage was due to an incorrect screw used during the build process. Additionally, potential buyers expressed hesitance clouded by practical concerns such as limited garage space, as mentioned by @CraigBaron, which could impact their bidding decisions. The atmosphere built around the vehicle was mostly positive, but the existence of unresolved issues and doubts about the car's past left some apprehensive.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's unique Icelandic Blue color, which is considered rare with only about 200 units made. The seller, @Healeykid, shares that the vehicle has been a reliable daily driver for two years and has provided enjoyable off-road adventures. Commenters like @Burnt_squirrel also express their admiration for the truck, reminiscing about their own positive experiences with an Icelandic Blue model, emphasizing how much fun they had with it.
Neutral: Overall condition inquiries focus on functional aspects such as the operational status of the A/C and sunroofs, and the current average temperatures reported by the ScanGauge II. @ctmuch12 asked several relevant questions, indicating a thorough consideration of potential issues. The seller acknowledges that while the vehicle is older, having recently serviced components like the A/C, it can still be reliable for a long trip, condition permitting. Several users engage in discussions about the truck's mechanical upkeep, including a question about the head gaskets from @Jschofi506 and maintenance history from @brianmurphy21.
Negative: Concerns arise from comments addressing oil leaks from various components and inquiries about a past accident. Specifically, @billbeal notes what appears to be oil on the trailing arm, leading to a response about ongoing leaks from the pressure relief valve. @trucksrule mentions a previous accident which was reported in 2007, and while @Healeykid explains the situation, it still raises questions about the vehicle's history and any potential impacts. The age of the vehicle and the necessity for cosmetic work are also perceived as negatives, with @Healeykid acknowledging the vehicle is not perfect and may require some investment for restoration.
|
 |
Positive: @SupraFreak praises the FJ for its attractive color and low mileage, highlighting its desirability with a 6-speed manual transmission. @Mabad1 also compliments the vehicle, stating it's one of the most durable trucks Toyota makes, sharing their own experience of high mileage. @nemerica777 agrees that the 6-speed manual is the best choice for this truck, reiterating its appeal among enthusiasts.
Neutral: @MikeNoLomotel raises concerns regarding the frame's treatment for rust and asks about the application of coatings. @IM4SEVEN shares the published dimensions of the vehicle but expresses uncertainty about the frame coating's origin. @StillNSFW acknowledges known issues with rust and frame integrity, suggesting more detailed photos could benefit potential buyers. @Rjppunk inquires about the brakes and the ownership history, noting the frequent changes despite low mileage.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition are prevalent among the comments. @MikeNoLomotel is worried about potential rust issues and asks for clarification on maintenance, while @StillNSFW emphasizes the importance of addressing known rust problems. @Rjppunk's question about the braking system and frequent ownership changes adds to the apprehension surrounding the vehicle's history.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received positive feedback for its unique color and beautiful interior. Commenters like @RMQ333 praised the car for its interesting Diamond Blue shade, noting it looks great in person, while @Dollycat3 expressed admiration for the overall stylishness and condition of the car. Many, including @Hoppy18 and @lincolnsandcaddies, highlighted the rarity of the bench seat option, adding to the car's appeal as a well-maintained classic.
Neutral: Several inquiries and observations regarding the vehicle were made, particularly by @67bossman and @cjetcat428, who asked about specific features like the headliner and a chrome bar below the bumper. There were also questions about the transmission type, with clarification from @avidude and @Calstickshift regarding whether it was a C4 or FMX. Sellers like @HighDesertMotors provided additional details in response, confirming the functionality of various features including the air conditioning and the tow bar's removable nature.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition, particularly by @ForeUs, who pointed out scratches and potential corrosion near the door handle, prompting others like @drcougar to suggest improvements regarding the routing of power steering hoses to avoid safety hazards. Comments from @Springman and @Cougar_Guy mentioned the aftermarket body moldings, lamenting their impact on the Cougar's lines, while @JStafford96 noted imperfections in the paint that might resemble rust bubbles. Such comments reflect the need for the seller to address these potential issues.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the 2023 Range Rover P530 as a 'stupendous example of British luxury,' with great emphasis on the car's pristine condition and thorough service history, maintained by a general manager with extensive experience in Jaguar Land Rover dealerships. @racer355 (The Seller) enthusiastically responds to inquiries, showcasing a customer-oriented attitude by offering options for in-person inspections and virtual viewing. Buyers express strong interest, with one user, @VolvoguyKC, conveying eagerness to bid on the vehicle, while @Jeb05420 appreciates the opportunity to arrange a test drive, indicating a positive perception of the car and its presentation.
Neutral: Several inquiries arise regarding the vehicle's specifications and maintenance history, demonstrating the potential buyers' desire for clarity. @porschedriver questions the early replacement of rear pads and rotors, with @racer355 (The Seller) explaining that it is not uncommon. Similarly, @rhermansky confirms the absence of a foldable third row, and @ripper996 inquires about the engine's manufacturer, receiving clear and informative responses from the seller. These exchanges reflect an engagement with prospective buyers wanting to make informed decisions.
Negative: A few concerns are raised, particularly about the maintenance aspects of the Range Rover. @porschedriver's comment about the replacement of rear pads and rotors at only 10,000 miles addresses potential apprehension about the car's condition, while @Clemdog asks about the expiration of the warranty, signaling uncertainty. Additionally, @GRguy251 seeks clarification on the age of the tires and the number of keys, which may indicate a worry about hidden issues that the potential buyer should consider. Overall, while the comments vary, they illustrate a cautious approach by some inquiring about the vehicle's history and reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters are impressed with the vehicle's overall aesthetic and functionality. @Bones.Justice praised the vehicle's appearance, calling it 'gorgeous' and commendings the photographer for their staging. @Wob highlighted the car as 'SPECTACULAR,' emphasizing its stunning silver and black color, as well as its driving performance, describing it as "driving like a DREAM!" Other commenters appreciated the informative nature of the seller's posts, particularly regarding the auction process and the detailed handling of inquiries, which cultivates an engaging and enjoyable bidding environment.
Neutral: Several comments focused on practical aspects such as service history and maintenance needs. Commenters like @walnut4488 and @mserpe raised questions about the car's suspension and any potential leaks, showing concern for the vehicle's condition and needing reassurance about necessary repairs. @multihullmotors brought up registration specifics in California, receiving clarification from the seller about gray market restrictions. These discussions reflect a conscientious approach by potential bidders to ensure they understand the vehicle's specific history and requirements before placing a bid.
Negative: There were some concerns raised regarding the vehicle's potential mechanical issues. @mserpe pointed out signs of a possible leak and questioned the use of sealant, suggesting that maintenance may not have been fully up to par. Additionally, there were remarks about the front suspension possibly being lower than the rear, indicating a need for potential spring replacements. @walnut4488 echoed this concern and suggested that buyers should budget for possible repairs. These comments introduced some caution regarding the vehicle's immediate reliability, contrasting the otherwise enthusiastic reception.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting it as an embodiment of exceptional automotive engineering and beauty. @shamansky praised the car's design and power, stating it to be among the best-looking and most powerful station wagons available. @DieselM333 and @Jakeafi agreed, calling this car the pinnacle of AMG wagons and a nearly perfect vehicle, respectively. @Calli74 echoed this sentiment, expressing a desire to see the car in person and love for its Lunar Blue color. Additionally, @Parrotheadfl (The Seller) ensured potential buyers of the car's complexity and safety features, emphasizing that the advanced driver assistance systems are functional and enhance driver experience.
Neutral: The comments also reveal a mix of inquiries and requests for further details about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @Jeb05420 asked for pictures of any damage prior to repairs, while @michaelkvance inquired about a particular service noted in the Carfax report. @pkbanc wanted to know if the car was previously used to transport dogs, showing interest in the vehicle's care. @Eiremon shared their personal experience with the vehicle model, noting its versatility. @Parrotheadfl (The Seller) provided comprehensive responses, detailing repairs and maintenance records, but also noted minor issues with the seat pocket and sunshade that have not been fixed.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly in regards to certain repairs and potential leaks. @Deigs and @Calli74 pointed out common oil leak issues associated with the engine type, which could lead to more significant problems. @pkbanc sought clarification about the extent of damages repaired, while @jjeremyw04 questioned the decision to extend the auction despite the seller's imminent departure. Some commenters, like @bigdogandy and @zraphael, humorously speculated on the car's desirability and the implications of purchasing it. Despite these concerns, the overall response to the vehicle remained positive.
|
 |
Positive: @Rjonesz remarked on the beauty of the car, mentioning he saw it listed on Cars & Bids previously, indicating a level of desirability. @Yao2000 (The Seller) highlighted the impressive engine performance and sound of the vehicle, which seems to be a selling point. Additionally, @Yao2000 (The Seller) stated that the car's main functions, such as heat, A/C, brakes, steering, and suspension, are working well, alleviating some concerns about functionality.
Neutral: @Yao2000 (The Seller) clarified the situation regarding the keys by confirming that there is only one key available. @Yao2000 (The Seller) also addressed the concerns raised about the paint damage, stating there is none and assuring that protection film is on the front bumper. Furthermore, the seller stated that the oil and filter change was completed in September, providing a timeline for maintenance.
Negative: @bobzcad requested more pictures and raised concerns about apparent paint damage and tire issues. @Rjonesz expressed skepticism regarding the large gash and bubble on the tire, questioning if it would be replaced before the auction ends. @rjayhawk94 and @ShivrMeTmbrs questioned the validity of the sales pitch, asking for videos of cold starts due to the low mileage on the car and a pattern of selling it shortly after acquiring it, suggesting a lack of transparency.
|
 |
Positive: @Barryward expressed admiration for the truck's appearance, describing it as a great looking vehicle. The seller, @jonathanjamesdupree, also clarified that the truck is in excellent condition with no important parts needing replacement.
Neutral: @WIZZZZ inquired about the condition of the transmission, rear end, and suspension, as well as details about the motor's setup and tune-up status. They asked if the truck has a carburetor or throttle body injection and if the AC is functional. Additionally, @jharris979 requested videos demonstrating the vehicle's cold start, warm start, and driving capabilities.
Negative: @WIZZZZ raised questions about the maintenance history of the truck, specifically asking about any potential odometer rollovers and the need for a tune-up, implying concerns regarding the truck's reliability. These inquiries suggest uncertainty about the truck's overall condition despite the seller's assurances.
|
 |
Positive: @RadClassicMotorsports (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a beautiful 2001 Subaru Outback limited sedan that has been mostly dealer serviced and has a clean Carfax. They emphasize that this model is tough to find, especially with the H6 engine, and appreciate the truck's remarkable condition considering its age. They also mention that it just passed the PA state inspection, indicating a level of reliability and functionality.
Neutral: Commenters generally observe that the vehicle looks good from the topside and highlight its all-wheel-drive feature. There are comments questioning specific aspects of the vehicle's condition, including surface rust and the maintenance history of the braking system. The Seller responds to inquiries about the car's condition, indicating that the rust seen is surface-level and that it should not impede the car's usability if driven in a drier climate.
Negative: Several commenters express concern about the vehicle's condition, particularly focusing on the areas prone to rust due to previous exposure to harsh road conditions in Pennsylvania. @jhill1977 notes their disappointment upon seeing the condition of specific areas of the vehicle, and @Calstickshift raises concerns about structural integrity due to visible corrosion. @Pafrmboy also cautions about potential rust in the rear shock towers and suggests the car should be moved to a drier area rapidly. Overall, the comments reflect a wary sentiment towards the structural integrity and rust issues of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed enthusiasm and admiration for the vehicle. @hausblau described it as 'iconic' and 'nice and clean', while @SVMc called it 'obviously stunning' and shared their aspiration of owning such a car. @mohzart described it as a 'fabulous car' and appreciated the early bids, and @Espanolie complimented the classic color combination of the car. Additionally, @markb3 praised the quality of the detailing work done on the car, enhancing its overall appeal.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on specific aspects of the vehicle, such as @Amflores inquiring about potential oil leaks, which the seller acknowledged and promised to investigate. Other users like @Cars-Guitars asked about the history of ownership, visible defects, and requested additional media like a walk-around video. @shdwfx raised questions about a popping sound from the door hinge, indicating a careful examination of the vehicle's condition is taking place by prospective buyers. The seller responded to scrutiny by offering transparency about the car's history and current state.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns regarding potential flaws in the vehicle. @BlueTTop noted a 'cheap shortcut repair' for the driver's door strap and suggested budgeting for a proper fix, indicating skepticism about some repairs. Similarly, @Cars-Guitars pointed out a possible crack in the dash and requested confirmation about its condition, highlighting that there might be visible issues when inspecting the vehicle. @TomSgarlata expressed disbelief about the car's high price relative to its mileage, suggesting a disconnect between market demand and value perceived by some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments from various users showcase appreciation for the vehicle's features and upgrades. @broncobob highlights the solid body and frame, along with impressive enhancements like premium suspension and disc brakes, stating it's enjoyable to drive and not too perfect for everyday use. @KTDreemz and @CBar5 compliment the bronco, with CBar5 particularly noting the attractive aftermarket LED headlights and modern upgrades, as well as the nostalgic KC Daylighters, which enhance the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: Several users have asked practical questions regarding the vehicle's specifications and included items. @wetherbee101 and @needadailydriver inquire about the hardtop's removability and the vehicle's ride height, to which @broncobob responds promptly. @moparguitar expresses interest in the original hood, confirming it is available with modifications for the sale. Additionally, @Breezejammer addresses communication issues with questions sent through the platform, reflecting a standard inquiry practice during such auctions.
Negative: There are minor concerns raised regarding the availability of photos and additional features. @86gerrish is specifically looking for pictures of the vehicle with the top off and whether a soft top is included; however, @broncobob reports no soft top is available and commits to seeking further images. Meanwhile, @Joshlaw92 questions the vehicle's air conditioning capability, indicating a desire for comprehensive details that may not have been fully covered in the listing.
|
 |
Positive: @aegmotorsports provided detailed responses about the vehicle's clutch and gearbox, confirming that the clutch feels smooth and firm with a consistent engagement point. The seller also assured that the tires are still safe for long-distance travel, noting the absence of any signs of cracking or dry rotting. Additionally, the dual-zone A/C system is functioning properly, with both sides blowing cold air as expected, which highlights the overall reliability and maintenance of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments expressed curiosity about the vehicle's condition and history. @OR1217 inquired about the repainting of the vehicle, and @aegmotorsports clarified that the paint measurements are consistent with factory specifications, indicating no repaint was detected. There is also a question from @Niedermohr regarding the vehicle's low mileage in recent years, suggesting potential concerns about the vehicle's usage.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle's configuration and previous maintenance. @LayNout criticized the lack of sport or M-Sport package on the 335i Coupe, labeling it as sacrilege. Furthermore, @OR1217 expressed apprehension about the aging tires, wondering about their safety for long trips, despite getting reassurance from @aegmotorsports.
|
 |
Positive: @LetMe_ThatPoint shared excitement about the vehicle, referring to it as "Holy forbidden fruit!" Another comment from @PulseCheck described it as a "2001 wet dream right here," indicating strong interest and admiration for the car. @iloy praised the RS4 Cosworth for its unique attributes, mentioning its "awesome" power and Quattro Turbo heritage, showcasing a high regard for the vehicle in terms of performance. Additionally, @hobbsm3 called it a "beautiful RS4," highlighting its aesthetic appeal. These comments reflect a positive sentiment towards the car's design and performance characteristics.
Neutral: Many comments were focused on inquiries about the vehicle's condition and service history. @MBWest raised questions about the federalization timeline of the car, expressing concerns about the mileage and discrepancies in records, which are typical questions potential buyers may ask. @Sprchng asked for clarifications regarding the ashtray functionality and requested images to better assess the car's condition. The seller, @MayorCars, responded to these inquiries with detailed explanations, emphasizing transparency and the availability of service records, which shows engagement with potential buyers.
Negative: However, there were also some reservations expressed about the vehicle. Comments flagged for being non-constructive from users like @Mirthmobile and @Good4UandMe did not contribute positively to the discussion. @StevenH766 specifically requested more detailed photos of flaws and expressed concerns regarding the wear on the vehicle's interior. @jray questioned the window trim alignment and functionality, which signifies doubts about the car's upkeep. These negative comments and inquiries reflect a level of skepticism that potential buyers may have when considering such a vintage vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's condition and features. @gscharnagl noted that while two wheels have minor curb rash, they can easily be refinished, suggesting the wheels have potential for restoration. @aegmotorsports (The Seller) confirmed that the minor damages are manageable and highlighted the vehicle's visual appeal, including the great paint job on the fender and front end as noted by @Dhawk. The dynamic SL550 is also designed to be practical, as the trunk can accommodate two sets of golf clubs, and the seller reassured buyers that the multi-contour seats with heating and ventilation functions operate perfectly.
Neutral: The exchange included questions from potential buyers seeking further information about the vehicle's features and service history. @rhern213 inquired about the service records for the convertible top hydraulics, reflecting buyer due diligence. @jag62 wanted to know if the car includes original documentation and the number of key fobs available, exhibiting standard inquiries for a prospective buyer. Additionally, @ram_g requested specific photos for a more detailed evaluation of various components, showcasing typical interest in the car's condition and features prior to bidding.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's wear and damages. @rhern213 and @dbscpa specifically sought clarification on the convertible top's service history and the functioning of the soft-close feature in the trunk. @gscharnagl and @dbscpa pointed out potential issues with the condition of the paint due to the nonmetallic Mars Red color, which may be more prone to showing scratches and swirl marks. Overall, while the car had many positive aspects, there were several inquiries regarding its maintenance history and condition, underlining common apprehensions among bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @bhoffma1 thinks this Jeep is very cool and extends good luck with the auction. @craZee just bought a 392 and is loving it, having averaged 16 MPG on a 700-mile trip. @MerlinsGarage expresses that this is the most fun, factory-created Jeep ever produced, highlighting the excitement of driving the 392. @mini2nut appreciates the free giveaways the seller is including and wishes for a successful sale.
Neutral: @Jay392PNW (The Seller) shares his detailed experience as the original owner of the 2023 Rubicon 392, mentioning that it has been well maintained, garage-kept, and serviced on schedule. He emphasizes the practical upgrades made to enhance capability and reliability, such as a Warn winch and an ARB compressor. The seller also offers transparency about a minor issue with the driver's rear shock that does not affect drivability or ride quality, reaffirming the remaining factory warranty coverage until February 2026.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns; for instance, @davethewave911 questions why the seller hasn't repaired the known leaking shock if it is covered under warranty. The seller replies that it hasn’t affected drivability, which is why he chose not to fix it and offers to handle it if requested by the buyer. Additionally, the seller had to clarify a previous mistake regarding paint protection film in the listing, acknowledging it was an oversight and providing further details.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting its beauty and originality. @mick59称赞这款Oval车为“美丽”，而@frankle称其拥有“原装发动机”令人称奇。@pyrobug18k1感觉这辆车就如同“沉睡的美女”，而@Ypss36称之为“时间胶囊”，并分享了与其深厚的情感联系。许多评论者对卖家的诚信表示欣赏，@mike_v特别提到卖家没有隐藏车底的“诚实”照片，@APLANTEDLEIF对于黑色甲壳虫的赞美更是直言不讳，认为其“色彩出众”。 @Dollycat3也称卖家极其优秀，并称这辆车“绝对美丽”。
Neutral: There were several curious and inquisitive comments regarding the car's specifications. @ASFSUPRa询问车辆是12V还是6V并对信号灯的设计表示感兴趣，而@milage确认车辆为6V，按照主要描述和图片说明。此外，@adanac补充了关于车辆信号闪烁器的额外信息。@Pfeil则表示这类车在考虑复原时是值得寻求的选择，并且买家可以在购买后享受驾驶的乐趣，这显示出对其价值和使用的多种看法。
Negative: Although the comments leaned heavily towards admiration, the discussions hinted at some concerns regarding usage and practicality. @adanac幽默地提醒@Ypss36在加油后不要忘记翻回油箱开关，表示维护的一些小麻烦。而@tlcamg对这个车型较为渴望，但隐约透露出在将其作为圣诞礼物时可能需要“让老板知道”的复杂情况，这在一定程度上反映出对资金或者购买决策的考量。总的来说，没有严重的负面评论，但存在一些对实用性与维护的讨论。
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's appearance, particularly its 'clean' presentation and striking 'arctic white' color. @MB-BKRPT remarked on its cleanliness, while @schigh compared its white finish to 'the driven snow,' suggesting it stands out impressively. @bigchachu added his approval, noting that the color should not pose an issue and suggested that a wrap could easily solve any color concerns. The Seller, @4WHEEL_GERMAN, emphasized satisfaction with the car's condition, describing it as 'drop dead gorgeous' with an equally impressive color combination, and reassuring potential buyers about the vehicle's functionality by confirming all systems work as intended.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged with questions regarding the vehicle's condition and prior damage. @Morden asked about the working order of the car and any visible wear, while @Adnan1970 and @Saihat20 inquired specifically about any reported damage. The Seller confirmed through his responses that there were no accidents and that cosmetic defects in auction reports can sometimes be marked as minor damage. Commenters also debated parts availability, with some sharing personal experiences and advice on sourcing parts for older Mercedes vehicles, indicating a mixture of confidence and concern regarding maintaining classics.
Negative: Concerns were raised about parts availability and the potential challenges of owning a classic Mercedes. @AMG5pt4 pointedly remarked that while some parts can be sourced with effort, it is increasingly becoming a challenge for long-term owners, indicating a broader issue within classic car ownership. @Chicagomike criticized others for their optimistic views, highlighting his struggles in finding specific OEM parts, which he deemed essential. @sbr21212 echoed these sentiments, mentioning difficulties in locating rubber seals. Overall, a few voices expressed that while the vehicle is beautiful, its upkeep might be more problematic than anticipated.
|
 |
Positive: @Theodore mentioned a fondness for low mileage and well-kept SC400s, expressing his enjoyment of a similar model he purchased. @CHOLAR also praised the SC400, emphasizing its exceptional engine performance and the car's rarity as a well-maintained vehicle. Its historical value was noted in relation to its price point back in 1992, equating it to a higher value today.
Neutral: Several users requested more detailed information or images, specifically about the timing belt and possible damage. @AdamScherr2025 (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the timing belt and the engine's check engine light, providing clarifications and promising to improve photo quality. @KeninSJ pointed out the nice condition of the HVAC vent in light of issues that often occur with this model.
Negative: Multiple comments highlighted existing flaws in the car's condition. @RammJaeger criticized the lack of detailed descriptions and adequate photos of damage, while also expressing concern about the seller's effort in presenting the car. @BobbyBeGood remarked on the car's somewhat beaten appearance, and @Kemrex questioned the state of the driver’s door panel, reflecting a general observation that the vehicle may require significant TLC.
|
 |
Positive: @BigT77 describes the vehicle as a 'diamond in the rough,' indicating that there is something special about it. @Conman70 expresses appreciation for the sunroof delete feature, complimenting the overall aesthetics of the car and wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @RadClassicMotorsports praises the car's condition and its rare pearl white color, welcoming potential buyers and highlighting the availability of the vehicle for in-person viewing.
Neutral: Several comments, including one from @ItsRoss, express interest in additional undercar photos, suggesting that transparency about the vehicle's condition is important to potential buyers. @dkolar inquires about shipping assistance, indicating practical concerns for potential buyers not local to the auction site. @SenseiJonS asks whether the vehicle was previously owned by a non-smoker, reflecting a common consideration among used car buyers regarding vehicle quality.
Negative: A comment from @tinmanwpk suggests that an earlier remark was flagged as non-constructive, implying dissatisfaction with some interactions in the comment section. Although the overall feedback has been positive, the lack of immediate access to detailed undercar photos and struggles with weather conditions for obtaining them could be seen as a drawback. There is a noticeable lack of stronger negative comments regarding the vehicle itself, which suggests it is generally well-received.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning aesthetic and unique features. @CJ8T3 noted their initial interest in purchasing the car previously, expressing happiness that it has been enjoyed. @hspiap complimented the 'great color' of the car and seemed impressed by its condition, while @Tanburicemil shared enthusiasm for the vehicle's specifications. The seller, @j711, also emphasized the car's beauty and appreciated its unique spec, contributing positively to the overall sentiment.
Neutral: Some comments focused on questions about the car's features and maintenance history. @G-Dub inquired about the availability of a build sheet or window sticker, while @hspiap raised questions regarding the service needs, tire condition, rotors, and the presence of any cosmetic damages. @BobG654936 asked for the tire date codes and installation mileage, reflecting typical buyer inquiries without overt negativity or positivity.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns regarding the history of ownership and the perceived frequency of transfers for such a special vehicle. @bbrs questioned the reasoning behind the car having four owners in nine years, indicating a concern about the car's desirability or potential issues. @hspiap also pointed out the need for clarity on possible undercarriage leaks or damages, which could contribute to skepticism about the car’s overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, showcasing their excitement about the Land Cruiser's rarity and condition. @Schenkmeister described it as a dream Land Cruiser, praising its unique features like dual tanks and a cooler box. @Cbad_Landcruiser echoed the sentiment, calling it a dream cruiser. Additionally, @Topgearz1 highlighted the seller's expertise and impressive collection, indicating trust in the seller's knowledge about Land Cruisers. Overall, the Land Cruiser received plenty of compliments for its quality and the seller was acknowledged for their transparent selling process.
Neutral: Several comments were more informational, discussing specifics of the vehicle such as its diesel engine and emissions testing. @David_P noted that it's unusual to see a diesel variant from the Middle East, while @Kyle.W reflected on the rarity of such models in the U.S. market. @TheMDNTcollection (The Seller) provided clarity on emissions regulations in Arizona, indicating that vehicles over certain ages are often exempt. Additionally, questions about the vehicle's size and towing capacity were raised, with the seller responding with measurements and pertinent details.
Negative: Some comments pointed out concerns or shortcomings about the vehicle. @platas mentioned that the only thing missing from the Land Cruiser is lockers, which could be viewed as a drawback for some potential buyers. Moreover, @craina noted that the vehicle lacks a turbo, which is a desirable feature for some. @anderaa asked about the interior smell, implying potential worries about the vehicle's condition despite its impressive appearance. Overall, there were minor critiques, but they did not overshadow the overall positive feedback.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's outstanding condition and the meticulous maintenance from @Max1mpact (The Seller). @Longmire45 noted the impressive color combination of 'Red on Red' and praised the transferable warranty and service contracts. @rip91396 called it a beautiful Trackhawk and appreciated the proper maintenance, while @HELIDR stated that despite not being a fan of Jeep products, this vehicle changed his perspective. Others like @dbennish and @craZee shared their positive experiences, highlighting the driving thrill and practicality of the Trackhawk.
Neutral: @Max1mpact (The Seller) provided comprehensive details about the Trackhawk's maintenance history and service records, including a transferable extended warranty. He clarified that he was the sole owner since 2019 despite the Carfax showing multiple owners, as previous transfers were for trust purposes. Additional commentary recognized the features of the vehicle like the impressive horsepower and the high-quality installations of protective coatings and films, contributing to its aesthetic and functional appeal.
Negative: A few comments highlighted concerns about the vehicle's previous issues with the media display noted in the Carfax. @Descanuck humorously mentioned that taking a Trackhawk off-road seems unthinkable, indicating some skepticism about its intended use for adventurous driving. @Longmire45 further probed into the reasons for selling, indicating a sense of empathy and concern from some community members regarding the seller's personal situation, suggesting that letting go of a beloved vehicle can be difficult.
|
 |
Positive: @1985CCX expresses a strong fondness for these cars, stating they are undervalued and highlighting their fun and engaging driving experience. @HollandNovak agrees, noting the desirability of the color combo despite existing damage reports. @iakllc (The Seller) mentions the well-maintained undercarriage, indicating a lack of rust, which could be a positive aspect for potential buyers.
Neutral: @Peterfenn1 provides a realistic perspective on the vehicle's market value, suggesting that while he perceives worth in the range of $30K+, the broader market does not reflect this. @HollandNovak supplements this with commentary on the car's status in light of mileage and reported damage, suggesting it could affect interest. @iakllc (The Seller) offers to provide further details and photos regarding concerns raised about the vehicle's condition, showing a willingness to engage and clarify for potential buyers.
Negative: @georgesauto raises concerns about the mismatched paint on the vehicle, attributing it to repair work post-accidents and suggesting that this defect could significantly detract from the car's appeal and value if not addressed. @Tucciim questions the extensive repair work conducted in 2021, indicating potential issues with documentation that may raise red flags for buyers. Overall, these comments contribute to a narrative of apprehension regarding the car's condition and history.
|
 |
Positive: @bforbesut and @JaDawgPNW expressed excitement about the vehicle, praising its condition and appearance. @bforbesut remarked on how rare it is to see such a well-maintained car, emphasizing that it is 'super cool'. Similarly, @JaDawgPNW simply stated, 'Awesome! Love it! Great looking car.' These comments reflect a positive reception of the car's aesthetic appeal and condition from potential buyers or enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Maroonedd raised a relevant question about the car's history, specifically regarding any potential damage from snow, ice, or salt, providing an opportunity for the seller, @Derbyone, to clarify the vehicle's background. @YevhenYamndi requested input from Eclipse enthusiasts about factors that could impact the value of a 2G Eclipse, indicating a keen interest in the car's market positioning. @CWinds inquired about the extent of any underbody corrosion shown in the images, wanting more detailed information to assess the vehicle's overall condition.
Negative: @omarsito2306 dismissed the value of the car, advising others not to bid, which could dissuade potential buyers. Additionally, @DUGEEEFRESH04 reminisced about the car's past popularity, but this nostalgia hints at a decline in desirability over time. @Derbyone, the seller, addressed concerns about underbody corrosion, stating that there is minimal corrosion, but the emphasis on 'corrosion' repeatedly may provoke doubts about the vehicle's condition in the eyes of cautious buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @M0Hair praised the vehicle for its impressive silverstone exterior paint job, calling it the most fantastic and versatile driving car they've ever experienced. @GDogg agreed with a compliment, describing the GTC4 Lusso as absolutely stunning and expressing admiration for the awesome specifications. @varun2508 also commented positively on the car's specifications, stating that it is nicely configured and wished the seller good luck.
Neutral: @houae23 inquired about a misalignment of the passenger side bumper and fender, requesting clarification about potential paint reading pictures. @rampante550 asked about specific details regarding the car's paint and the tire date codes, showing interest but no evident concern. @Vizsla requested pictures of the rear seats folded down for better understanding of luggage space, indicating a practical perspective on the vehicle's usability.
Negative: @CorsaSpeciale shared their frustration from having faced a similar issue with bumper misalignment on their own GTC4 Lusso, detailing how Ferrari considered such quality issues acceptable despite their high purchase price. @DesertRaptor brought up a concern about the appearance of a leather panel separating from the back-panel, prompting doubts about the car's condition. Additionally, @cybergeek mentioned potential upkeep issues, such as needing to keep the vehicle on a trickle charger to avoid gearbox trouble, indicating that there are pitfalls associated with this model.
|
Original-Owner 1966 Chevrolet Corvette Coupe L36 427/390 4-Speed
194376S119300
Lot 222683
Private Party
 |
Positive: @boobenstein described the vehicle as giving new meaning to "long term ownership," highlighting its impressive history. @Bigenca expressed admiration for the car, calling it gorgeous and one to watch. @Tripledigit praised the seller for their nearly 60 years of ownership and dedication to the vehicle, while @Emdoller noted the beauty of the car and the sadness of seeing it leave the family. Furthermore, @Dvredc5 appreciated the value added by the original owner's care and stewardship over the years, saying it was refreshing to see such dedication.
Neutral: Several comments raised interesting points about the vehicle's modifications and history. @Driftwood26 and @GMDownunder questioned the authenticity and rarity of the tank sticker and multiple tail lights, with @67Corvetteguy clarifying the documentation's significance. @SkyDriver1949, the seller, provided insight into the car's purchase history, options chosen, and detailed maintenance records that have been kept over the years. Comments also sparked curiosity about specific components, such as the original spare tire and license plates, with @SkyDriver1949 offering thorough responses to these inquiries.
Negative: While many comments were positive, some highlighted concerns about the modifications made to the vehicle. @Shootnride remarked that the repaint and extra tail lights might prevent the car from qualifying for awards like the Bloomington Gold Benchmark or NCRS recognition. @revolverz and @MrTrim questioned the significance of the documentation and the accuracy of the vehicle's components, such as the valve covers, which led to discussions on authenticity versus personal preference. Overall, some commenters seemed disappointed that the vehicle's modifications detracted from its potential as a collector's item.
|
 |
Positive: @JB455 expresses admiration for the vintage vibe of the vehicle, describing it as a time capsule from an era when originality was not paramount (@Locksmith661). @macroni finds the car very cool and sees it as a passion project that needs some housekeeping. @Bigfatross appreciates the modifications made, such as the wheelchange and gives it a thumbs up for its aesthetic. @Lucky253 describes it as epic, while @GameWarden notes the car has valuable components that exceed the overall car's current bid. @JB646878 (The Seller) also shares links to videos of the car running, showing it drives despite needing some maintenance, indicating its potential as a project car.
Neutral: Commenters like @lust4speed have pointed out the importance of confirming engine specifications and have requested photos of identifying numbers from the engine block, which @JB646878 (The Seller) has promised to provide. Users @BaronVonZeppelin and @rgilson7 are engaged in discussions about the car's history and components, sharing insights on the authenticity of the engine and drive train, and how engine swaps were a common practice during the GTO's heyday. @Noisyboyz emphasizes the necessity of documenting history through PHS documents to verify the model's authenticity. Comments about the modifications received mixed reactions, with some suggesting they might reduce the overall value, while others find them interesting.
Negative: However, concerns about the condition of the car have also surfaced. @JB646878 (The Seller) acknowledged that the tires are over 40 years old, which raises questions about safety and maintenance. @redboots suggests starting from scratch by removing certain components, indicating a sense of confusion over the car's current state. Some commenters like @BroncoRider and @BaronVonZeppelin are skeptical about the engine upgrades, clarifying the discrepancies between what was factory-installed versus later modifications. Additionally, @Elagarto is curious about a sound in the car's interior, jokingly likening it to a lawnmower, which points to a potentially problematic fuel pump or other issues yet to be addressed.
|
 |
Positive: Comments reflect a strong appreciation for the BMW E21 model, highlighting it as an underappreciated classic with many enthusiasts believing its time to shine is approaching. @rdiamond recalls fond memories of learning to drive in a 320 IS, describing it as beautifully balanced and enjoyable to drive. @702e30girl praises its aesthetic appeal, likening it to the iconic E30. Enthusiasts like @Bo_S_Jackson and @JAY-Z note the car's well-preserved condition, especially pointing out the pride of ownership evident in the choice of quality tires, contrasting it with other vehicles from that era that are often neglected.
Neutral: Several commentators discuss various features of the car, expressing curiosity and engaging with the seller. @szabi and @wem5310 ask about specific features like the limited slip differential and air conditioning, leading to clarification from @hopsedge (the seller) regarding the car's condition and history. @hopsedge shares about his personal connection with the vehicle, recounting his discovery and enjoyment of it, which adds a personal touch to the discussion. Others, like @BloodyHell, comment on the condition of the car, noting minor issues but appreciating its overall character and potential.
Negative: A few comments reflect some concerns regarding the vehicle’s features and condition. @Broovy questions the relevance of a cabin heater mentioned in the listing, suggesting it may be unnecessary information, while @hopsedge agrees and explains its inclusion. Additionally, @Redbaron95 provides insight into the absence of functioning air conditioning, indicating that it was likely factory-installed but has since been removed—a sentiment echoed by @BryMac, who adds that the air conditioning can detract from the car's performance. Overall, these comments reveal mild criticism towards the listing and some features of the car, but they do not overshadow the overall positive sentiment towards the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's performance and condition. @newcarpro expressed admiration for the power of the V10 engine, calling it a brute that can handle any situation. @SimplexFish shared similar sentiments, stating how much they loved the V10 and inquiring about a 4WD conversion cost, highlighting community engagement. Other positive comments came from @gafoscpc1 and @Gumby1, who appreciated the beauty and reliability of the van, highlighting their long experience with Ford vans, and @shooker, who recounted how well Fords perform, particularly with the V10 engine.
Neutral: Commenters also brought up technical and practical considerations regarding the vehicle. @CarFoolLane noted the wide presence of Ford Transits, though they pointed out that the E-Series had better towing capacity. Discussions about the van's features included inquiries about the rear seat configuration, the gas mileage, and potential 4WD conversion, with @conus estimating costs and @NYAZ emphasizing the quality of 4WD conversions. Additionally, @CDehne and others asked for specific details about the van's care and features, indicating an ongoing interest in understanding the vehicle's capabilities.
Negative: Conversely, some comments raised concerns about the van's condition. @trekking66USA noted potential rust on the roof, leading to a discussion around its appearance, though the seller vehemently denied any existing rust, asserting the vehicle was stored indoors its entire life. @Gmondo mentioned the pricing issue, suggesting that if the auction climbs considerably, it could surpass the value of a brand new comparable van, which some found unappealing. The differing perceptions regarding the vehicle's condition caused a brief tension in the comments, especially when @wubaru remarked on the possibility of @trekking66USA trying to lower the price with negative commentary.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's condition, noting it as stunning and top-tier in terms of presentation and mechanical integrity. @Collectibleclassics highlighted its cosmetic quality and mentioned that this Aston Martin had undergone inspections and maintenance by Steel Wings, a reputable specialist. Many emphasized the pleasure of driving this vintage car and considered its market value as underappreciated, making it an attractive option for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding the vehicle's service history and documentation. @Skylineguy2612 and @Lioneljoseph both asked about available service records and whether there were evidence or indications of any past paintwork. The seller, @sixty4half, provided information about recent services and inspections to guarantee the car's condition, while also acknowledging some minor issues such as tire age without suggesting any urgent need for repairs.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's interior, especially the seats and dash, were raised by various commenters. @Dantwylie and @westcoastcars questioned the general wear and tear associated with early Aston Martin models while pointing out the degradation of the foam used in the seats. Additionally, @Eric997 and @Lioneljoseph raised doubts regarding potential paintwork and signs of prior repairs, with specific concerns around the leather's condition and dash separation. The seller reassured that any prior repair indications were out of warranty service actions, but some remained wary of the vehicle's authenticity regarding overall wear.
|
 |
Positive: The 2002 Porsche 911 Turbo Coupe is celebrated for its exceptional performance and iconic design. Commenters like @Espanolie and @daveglad highlighted its stunning aesthetics, nimble handling, and the thrill of driving a well-regarded Mezger engine that showcases Porsche's motorsport pedigree. Additionally, @Bowerpower22 noted the vehicle's remarkable value, stating it offers significant performance for the price, particularly when compared to more expensive models like the 993. Enthusiast @bmdaia pointed out that the Turbo's Mezger engine is rooted in Porsche's racing history, providing an exhilarating driving experience that buyers will appreciate.
Neutral: Several comments reflect on the vehicle's specifications and condition without strong bias. @Fermobianchi inquired about service records and was informed by the seller, @HalcyonMotorWorks, that while records post-2012 were limited, the car underwent regular maintenance and a compression test showing a healthy motor. Similarly, @copperjohn3 asked for details surrounding a past accident, which was explained as only involving minor cosmetic damage, a reassurance echoed in @nugent1021's inquiry about the car’s shifting performance and clutch condition. Buyers were encouraged by the seller to conduct pre-purchase inspections (PPIs) before bidding, allowing for thorough evaluations.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the car's maintenance history and the absence of documentation, as emphasized by @bostonaudi, who warned potential buyers about surprises due to missing service records. The inquiry by @Eurovanman about possible paint issues added to the apprehension, although the seller assured that the vehicle had not been over-compounded and offered to provide additional photos for clarity. Additionally, comments from @MoneyFire and @DTW_andre highlighted the need for test drives or closer inspections before purchase, indicating a degree of skepticism among potential bidders about fully understanding the vehicle's condition without experiencing it firsthand.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciate the condition and specifications of the vehicle, with @Vogelsang stating it is a "beautiful clean car" and @cj11 mentioning that it is one of the most dependable models ever built. They highlight aspects such as the impressive features of the 2015 BMW 740i M Sport, including the executive and lighting packages, and compliment the aesthetic appeal with the specific rims mentioned. Overall, there is a genuine enthusiasm for the quality and performance of this car.
Neutral: Responses from @aegmotorsports (The Seller) provide important factual information about the car. They confirm that the vehicle is a non-smoker, detail the available features and maintenance history, and clarify that it will be sold through a no reserve auction. Additionally, @aegmotorsports addresses queries about the number of keys and the absence of certain features like a heated steering wheel, while also stating that all maintenance is up to date and that the vehicle is in great shape.
Negative: There are limited negative comments, but @BL1848 raises concerns about any deferred maintenance for the vehicle, indicating that potential buyers may be cautious about purchase risks. The seller reassures that all necessary maintenance has been addressed and that the vehicle is in great condition. However, there is a mention that some flickering seen in the video of the vehicle's screens is merely a camera effect, which may cause some buyers to question the actual condition of the vehicle's screens.
|
 |
Positive: The comments include several affirmations about the vehicle's presentation, with @Suprahome noting that it looks good and @Arkonik (The Seller) confirming that the vehicle comes with a full canvas roof, which addresses concerns about rain coverage. Additionally, @Arkonik (The Seller) demonstrates responsiveness by providing information about the vehicle's features and previous maintenance, like the engine replacement under warranty.
Neutral: There are some inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition. @carteradam raises a question about rust around the hood hinges but receives reassurance from @Arkonik (The Seller) that the surface rust is evident in the provided photos. @Glgglv8 asks about warranty coverage for the new engine, indicating a cautious approach from potential buyers toward the vehicle's reliability.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the vehicle's condition. @Visotsky pointed out possible issues with a rag on the radiator return, while @carteradam expressed concern about rust, suggesting that there may be significant rust issues beyond what was noted, although @Arkonik (The Seller) attempted to minimize these worries by stating that the rust noted was left over after a valet. Lastly, @dogandponyshow questioned whether water on the passenger floor was due to AC leaking, which implies potential issues with the vehicle's interior.
|
 |
Positive: @GLWTA highlighted the beautiful build of the 992.1 Carrera T, specifically praising its color, GT Silver Metallic. @boaboyoz echoed this sentiment by describing it as "magic," which emphasizes the appeal of its aesthetics. Additionally, @JKB shared a personal experience with the car, mentioning that it checks all the right boxes and is a significant part of the Porsche mystique that does not disappoint. The comments reflect an appreciation for the vehicle's design and overall enjoyment it brings to its owners.
Neutral: There are discussions around the vehicle's documentation, particularly regarding the window sticker and build sheet. @Tcsbutton inquired about uploads for these documents, to which @ppassoni (The Seller) responded with images of the build sheet, although they mentioned limitations due to file sizes. @vnaar123 also asked specifically for the window sticker, showcasing a common interest among potential buyers in verifying the car’s specifications and history.
Negative: Some comments indicated concerns regarding the vehicle's past issues. @bimmerfan19 raised a question about a strange noise and a potential problem with the passenger seat belt, questioning why these issues didn’t seem to have a clear resolution. @ppassoni (The Seller) clarified that both issues were resolved, with no recurrence since they couldn't be replicated. Nevertheless, @Fuelieguy suggested that speculation about the seller’s reasons for selling or the car's past problems should not concern potential bidders, highlighting a tension between buyer apprehensions and the seller's reassurances.
|
 |
Positive: @AiDesignNY (The Seller) described the vehicle as awesome, capable of going anywhere, and noted that it still has the triple tilt bed and spare tire available. Commenters like @Wagen59 referred to it as a 'Tonka Truck brought to life' and @pfbz expressed interest in owning it along with a large ranch, highlighting its desirability. @UnimogRob acknowledged the quality of Unimogs, stating that they are capable of performing hard tasks, reflecting the vehicle's robust nature and practicality.
Neutral: Several commenters sought additional information about the vehicle's condition and history, with requests for videos of it running, driving, and a demonstration of the cold start. Questions like those from @RapidSD and @Durres showed a mix of curiosity and caution regarding the vehicle's performance and legal status. @AiDesignNY (The Seller) confirmed that the vehicle is street legal and explained an error code related to the air brake system pressure, aiming to address concerns while providing insights into the vehicle's capabilities.
Negative: Concerns surrounding a previous rollover incident were prevalent, with multiple users, including @alaskossie and @rbgerrish, asking for details and photographs of any damage and repairs. @UnimogRob revealed that the rollover was serious, involving a high-speed accident that resulted in a fatality, contrasting sharply with claims about the vehicle’s toughness. Commenters like @BrendanJB2024 raised questions about steering stability, pointing out potential issues that may need addressing, which some found unsettling about the vehicle's safety.
|
 |
Positive: Many commentators appreciate the altruistic aspect of the vehicle auction, notably @nexusautobrokers and @sethrf79, who commend the initiative and its support for a good cause. Additionally, @Gmmuscleusa highlights the vehicle's excellent condition and presentation, emphasizing that the proceeds will benefit charity. Former owner @EVTMD8 also contributed positively, sharing that he maintained the car well and confirming it was not subjected to hard driving or racing. Overall, the consensus is that this auction is a commendable effort that marries philanthropy with the love for a well-kept vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters asked practical questions regarding the vehicle's mechanical condition, including inquiries from @deerej18 about potential issues with the gearbox and @LT1WS6 regarding whether the heads had been addressed. @JamieWorkingWheels (The Seller) responded to these questions and provided insights into the car's maintenance and the nature of the noise reported in the driveline. @Crovet and @Gmmuscleusa both touched upon the vehicle's bodywork, raising questions while also acknowledging the overall care taken by its previous owner.
Negative: There were a few concerns expressed regarding potential issues with the vehicle, such as @sy1616 and @atmontemuro questioning the payment process and its relevance to buyers. Commenters like @HotVette and @Prokill1 raised queries about specific mechanical aspects of the car that were unclear, suggesting a lack of thorough transparency concerning the vehicle’s history. @zealf, @JGreev, and others also pointed out issues related to the body's cosmetic work and the condition of parts like the center console badge, indicating that some transparency might be needed to ensure buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @BRKMarsh praises the car's beautiful color combination, while @Mr._H highlights its iconic British styling and decent reliability, noting that it is well-broken in with a classic color combination. @carelallen and @60SeriesLC echo these sentiments by referring to the car's grace, space, and pace, and its appeal to women. @threeducs3 reinforces the idea that this is the best year for the XJ6, and others echo the car's beautiful aesthetic and overall quality, suggesting it was well cared for over the years. @jjblbi compliments the car's great color and notes the owner's honesty.
Neutral: @rbarongan (The Seller) responds to various inquiries about the car's condition, stating that all windows including the sunroof function properly and that the AC has not been checked but performed adequately for short drives. He clarifies that the car has been garage-kept and has not undergone any prior paint work. Some potential buyers like @scaledetails request additional service documentation, but the seller explains the absence of invoices from previous maintenance. The seller acknowledges there might be minor concerns such as a cosmetic bubble in the paint and some wear on the undercarriage but assures that the car is otherwise in good condition with no rust or significant leaks.
Negative: Concerns have been raised by some potential buyers regarding the car's mechanical condition. @Russtri mentions a negative experience with it being serviced at Pep Boys. Others, such as @993dreamer, express hesitation about the seller's lack of detailed mechanical records under his ownership, leading to uncertainties about deferred maintenance. Additionally, issues such as a noticeable rattle in the suspension during a test drive and concerns about potential repairs, like the AC not being strong in summer heat, contribute to some skepticism about the car's overall condition and required maintenance. @ncipps and @jagmo inquire about potential leaks, while @Apex_speed notes minor scrapes on the car's exterior that may require attention.
|
 |
Positive: @Wags911 praises the McLaren 600LT, stating it is arguably the best package McLaren has produced in the last decade. They highlight the car's mechanical feel, lightweight design, and intoxicating sound, emphasizing that it is more usable than the 720s. @Wags911 expresses a preference for the 600LT over other high-performance brands when it comes to track driving, noting its excellent steering and drivability on the street.
Neutral: @tyefish inquires about the vehicle's factory status and service records, indicating a level of interest in its maintenance history. @tuando429 admires the car's appearance and asks for information regarding its MSRP and options, while @ckimjin seeks clarification on warranties and paint protection film (PPF). @vpalaia (The Seller) confirms the car is factory original, responds to maintenance inquiries, and provides the MSRP of over $280,000, along with information on its service history and condition.
Negative: @jimmyfarias raises concerns regarding the quality of the front dash leather, questioning McLaren's overall quality. @vpalaia (The Seller) explains that the issue is merely cosmetic, as a plastic vent cover has popped up. Additionally, @ckimjin's question about PPF highlights potential apprehensions about the car's paint protection, which the seller clarifies is absent but states that the paint remains in mint condition due to careful storage and limited use.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning 'Arena Red' color and well-preserved condition. Commenters like @iam22lr and @mpm97turbo describe it as "stunning" and "beautifully preserved," suggesting that the car has maintained its charm over time. @Wob, the seller, emphasizes its exceptional features, such as a fresh service from Porsche and various luxury options, making it an enticing candidate for bidders. Overall, the excitement surrounding the auction reflects a shared appreciation for the craftsmanship and aesthetics of this iconic model, particularly the unique rot wood interior detail.
Neutral: Several comments raise practical questions about the vehicle's history and condition without expressing strong opinions. Users like @turbobst and @jetcity993rs inquire about the car's service records and mechanical condition, while @longhood2019 and @davebmwporsche mention potential concerns like paint meters and overspray. @mgernhar questions the accuracy of the Carfax report, indicating some uncertainty about its mileage. These inquiries reflect the careful consideration potential bidders are giving to the car, as they seek to understand its value and condition before placing bids.
Negative: A few comments address concerns about the vehicle, suggesting caution for prospective buyers. @davebmwporsche points out what appears to be overspray in the provided images, asking for clarification regarding the paint's condition. Additionally, @mgernhar expresses apprehension about possible leaks and the authenticity of interior options. Similarly, @bigT77 points out that, despite the car's appealing features, potential bidders should ensure they have their finances in order due to its high value. These comments highlight the importance of diligence among bidders, especially regarding the details that can affect the car's desirability and reliability.
|
 |
Positive: The VW Beetle is being praised for its unique character and perfect suitability as a beach cruiser, with comments highlighting its excellent stance and striking appearance. @911sAreBeetles referred to it as a perfect beach cruiser, complimenting its unique touches. @TTSAudi expressed curiosity about the brushed paint look and plaid headliner, indicating an appreciation for the vehicle's distinctive style. @Big_DaddyRL and @Discobob echoed the sentiments of admiration, calling it a delicious bug and a cool car with great looks. Many commenters, including @fabzfabz, expressed outright enthusiasm with exclamations like "OUTSTANDING RIDE!"
Neutral: Several comments focused on the technical aspects and historical features of the Beetle, such as questions regarding the speedometer's shift points from @APLANTEDLEIF and inquiries about the original type of front seats from @mark_99. @CompassRacing addressed these queries, providing insights that the speed points were customized due to the vehicle's current tire setup and confirming the seats were indeed original. @racerock recommended that the buyer consider adding a mechanical gauge to improve monitoring, thus showing a blend of technical interest and practical advice.
Negative: There were also minor concerns raised, primarily regarding technical functionality. @gauldingr noted that the driver had to manually activate the turn signals from under the dash, questioning the reliability of the original turn signal arm. @sellis inquired about the maintenance of the throw-out bearing and whether it was replaced when the engine was pulled, indicating a concern for the car's mechanical integrity. These comments show that while the car received overall positive feedback, there remains some apprehension about its mechanical aspects that potential buyers took into consideration.
|
 |
Positive: @Tposs001 praised the vehicle's color combination, indicating it is visually appealing. @Mithril911 remarked on the car's impressive presence, noting it fits well in an upscale environment. @GDogg highlighted how the Dark Sapphire color enhances the car's aesthetics, and @absent appreciated its prestigious history in Palm Beach. Additionally, @ashman528 complimented the vehicle's condition due to its low mileage, while @Pbraq and @martybrin both shared positive sentiments about the car's overall beauty and maintenance, respectively.
Neutral: @newcountrymotorcargroup (The Seller) provided information about the vehicle's history and maintenance, assuring interested parties that it has been well-kept despite its age. They addressed various questions from potential buyers, providing details regarding the replacement of the soft top and heated rear window due to age rather than mileage. Responding to inquiries about minor cosmetic wear and seat condition, they included close-up photos to clarify the car’s overall state and maintain transparency about the condition of the interior and exterior features.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @WisdomFirst and @pcaron regarding possible issues with the driver's door alignment and potential damage in the vehicle's interior. @LP150 noted problems with the driver's door alignment, suggesting it may have been in an accident, while @martybrin asked about any paint imperfections. @Msweetnam questioned the presence of water drops on chrome components, fearing potential damage, which @newcountrymotorcargroup answered by describing it as condensation. @Occ4u inquired about possible pitting on the chrome wheels, showing that there are various apprehensions among potential buyers about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle reflect enthusiasm for the unique '96 Z50 Gold bike being auctioned by @japaneseproprietor. Several users, including @BigT77 and @onlyhonda4me, express excitement and nostalgia, highlighting the bike as a classic and desirable model. @Rpl1, who already owns two of these bikes, acknowledges the aesthetic appeal of the one being offered, which indicates its strong visual presence and potential collector's value. The seller also shows willingness to assist with logistics, which adds to the positive reception among potential buyers.
Neutral: @Wagon528 engages actively with the auction, demonstrating interest in not just the bike being sold but also in the seller's collection as a whole. The conversations around bidding and the potential for purchasing multiple bikes indicate a lively auction atmosphere; however, no firm commitments from buyers have been made in this context. The seller's responses to inquiries about the other bike and shipping logistics provide a practical perspective to the ongoing discussions.
Negative: On the downside, some comments reflect confusion or skepticism, with @Shoudashell inquiring about the kilometers on the other bike and @Wagon528 humorously questioning the absence of more bikes from the seller's collection. These comments suggest some uncertainty about the offerings and the seller's previous claims, which could deter potential bidders. Furthermore, the seller's mention of the second bike being in lesser condition may raise concerns regarding its desirability as a restoration project rather than a prime collectors' item.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous commenters praised the vehicle for its stunning appearance, commenting on its beautiful well-preserved condition. @ProfessorX remarked on the NSX's beauty, especially highlighting the desirability of a yellow model, while @mhawkeONT described it as one of the finest examples seen, emphasizing its showroom condition. @Oldhockyplayr expressed nostalgia and admiration for the NSX, noting the gorgeous color and the vehicle's timeless elegance. Meanwhile, @kevie_p expressed a particular fondness for Spa Yellow, reiterating its appeal. Commenters like @trusted_one appreciated the combination of design and performance, complimenting the sound enhancements introduced by the seller.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions about the vehicle's specifications and features, with @911r (The Seller) providing extensive information about the car's history, maintenance, and recent upgrades. The seller offered insights into the paint quality, stating it appears original and unblemished, and shared a video walkthrough to showcase this. In addition, @bcin626 and @alex9971 had informative exchanges regarding the vehicle's undercoating, with the seller assuring it is factory applied and typical for low-mileage models. Discussions about the suspension setup, including the confirmed use of Eibach springs, demonstrated the community's interest in performance enhancements and vehicle care.
Negative: On the flip side, a few commenters expressed concerns and inquiries regarding maintenance issues. @alex9971 had reservations about potential rust due to the car's time in New York, while @cardude76 inquired about any deferred maintenance tasks. Additionally, there were questions about the car's modifications and their impact on resale value, with @kjl85 addressing concerns about undercoating and its potential to deter buyers. Overall, while the majority of feedback was positive, these concerns reflected the critical eye of potential buyers accustomed to meticulous standards.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's history and driving experience. @Pcarsba appreciates that the car has been driven, while @bmdaia describes it as a 'Mezger dream.' Enthusiasts like @sykraft and @switchcars admire the unique midnight blue color and rarity, highlighting that this specific model is one of only three in North America with full leather and PCCBs, making it a standout due to its limited color production. Several comments also underline the car's mechanical condition, noting that it has been well-maintained and mechanically reliable, with @EasyC and @KB4F praising the pristine DME and previous owner's care during its use on the track.
Neutral: @StantonGTI, the seller, provides detailed insights about the vehicle's maintenance history and the reasons behind its current condition. They explain how the car has been used for HPDEs, noting that such usage can sometimes be better for a car’s maintenance than those rarely driven. The seller also addresses various inquiries about the car's wear and tear, absence of notable leaks, and a paint meter reading which indicates original parts. This detailed explanation covers both mechanical updates and cosmetic conditions, reassuring potential buyers about the car's overall integrity.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the car's condition, with @RichPugh questioning a loud rattling noise in a driving video. There's also commentary from @woncom and @thindart1990, who are concerned about visible damages such as orange marks and chips, which might suggest neglect in exterior maintenance. Additionally, @racerjsz and @Forges raise questions about potential previous damage from track use, such as tire wall contacts, while @coolieman1220 stresses the rarity and value of the car, implying that any subpar conditions could overshadow its worth. Overall, while many affirm its quality, these concerns highlight possible red flags for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments reflect a positive sentiment towards the vehicle, emphasizing its appealing qualities and condition. @RNLabas describes it as a 'nice example' and expresses eagerness for the auction, while @nexusautobrokers appreciates the vehicle's aesthetics. @BigT77 praises the low mileage and colors, highlighting the overall experience of driving the R8 V8. Likewise, @CaskCoven, who has seen the car in person, notes it is cleaner than their previous similar model. @SpeedDemonJr. (The Seller) confirms the vehicle features new tires, a clean Carfax, and is accident-free, reassuring potential buyers of its condition and inviting further inquiries.
Neutral: Several comments pose questions regarding the vehicle's condition and maintenance history, indicating a desire for more information without bias. @BasilCMK inquires about the functionality of the AC, while @BillyAngelos seeks clarity over potential leaks and requests videos for better assessment. @AryaF and @domnom express curiosity about the car's service history, questioning various components like the brake life and fluid changes. @SpeedDemonJr. (The Seller) patiently responds to these inquiries, asserting confidence in the vehicle's condition and promising to provide the requested information soon.
Negative: Some comments evoke skepticism regarding the vehicle's maintenance and specific details that could be concerning. @BillyAngelos questions the authenticity of a cold start video, implying possible issues might be overlooked. Additionally, @EliBoMarley suggests that a full service might be necessary upon purchase for peace of mind, reflecting apprehension about potential hidden costs. Similarly, @AryaF raises valid points about required services like coolant and spark plug replacements that may not have been performed recently, alluding to potential future expenses for the new owner.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express enthusiasm and admiration for the Dodge Viper, noting its beauty and desirability. Commenters like @Busmannj and @Vipersforlife celebrate the car's impressive market value and collector appeal, highlighting it as a "Holy Grail" vehicle. Praise continues with remarks from @ACRSNK, who asserts it's the "best car money can buy" and emphasizes the unique driving experience it offers. The emotional connection to the car is evident, as several users reminisce about the Viper's significance as a piece of American automotive history, especially following its final production year.
Neutral: The discussion includes inquiries about specific features and details, like the car's stereo system and the missing parts such as the front splitter and rear diffuser extensions. @2003pilot and @ViperSRT pose questions about the car’s specs, while a somewhat skeptical tone emerges from users who express concern over the car’s incomplete status for collectors. The conversation also touches on the car’s rarity, with estimates that only about 100 units were made, which raises its value in the eyes of potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments indicate frustration regarding the car's missing parts and unclear ownership history. Critics point out that such discrepancies could hurt its value among purist collectors, as noted by @ViperSRT and @KICKINGTIRES. @viperlooker contests the seller's claims about the availability of replacement parts, questioning their practicality and price. There's a sentiment of skepticism surrounding the car's auction, with commenters like @jfkauto expressing doubts about the seller's estimates and highlighting that certain important pieces may have been lost or damaged, detracting from the vehicle’s overall appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @jefreeto highlights the beauty of the vehicle and expresses hope that the winning bidder uses it regularly. @Cdn043 praises the car’s features and describes it as one of the best offerings in a while. @Chefgordiemac and @stufrank both add their admiration for the car's aesthetics, calling it beautiful and commending the color choice by @MichaelEverson. Several commenters, including @JKleiner, express confidence in the car’s quality and reliability due to @MichaelEverson's long-standing reputation as a builder.
Neutral: @roystonian (The Seller) shares their experience with the car's fit, noting it is ideal for someone around 5'7" like themselves but that taller individuals may feel cramped. They also provide technical details about the car, answering specific queries about steering and brake components. @MichaelEverson contributes to the discussion by sharing insights about the car’s performance and features, highlighting the ease of driving and maintenance while addressing questions about the Coyote engine variations. Additionally, @Halfone asks about the potential for an automatic transmission, to which @MichaelEverson responds with important installation notes.
Negative: @ROBSREDFORD and @Masonpauls point out concerns regarding the large rear fender gap, discussing potential fixes. @Longplayer-road humorously remarks that the gap helps in snowy conditions, but this comment may reflect dissatisfaction with the car's aesthetic. @GoStrong raises a query about a disconnected wire, suggesting there may be uncertainty about the car's functionality. Furthermore, @pigman expresses interest in whether the design flaws of the rear wheel arch were a recent change, underscoring potential worries regarding quality in newer models.
|
 |
Positive: Overall, the comments reflect a very favorable view of the vehicle being sold, primarily highlighting its exceptional condition and features. @JAY-Z notes that, other than the low odometer reading of 3489 miles, there are no signs of wear and tear, describing it as immaculate and fully loaded. @KawTriple2t praises the Cummins & Allison combination partnered with a Freightliner chassis, which @Carolina993 further supports, stating these are well-built and high-end chassis supplied to RV makers. The overall sentiment is that the Seneca 37K is a great-looking motorhome, with many potential buyers expressing admiration for its appeal and features.
Neutral: Several comments included inquiries and additional information from the seller, @Monopolychris, demonstrating transparency regarding the motorhome's use and maintenance history. Potential buyers were curious about specific features, such as the operation of awnings, the condition of the generator, and whether the vehicle has ever had pets or smokers inside. @srhashimi and others posed practical questions about the motorhome's condition and functionality, emphasizing the level of interest and due diligence being undertaken by prospective buyers.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback, a few commenters raised concerns or expressed limitations regarding the motorhome's suitability. @huntinjeep mentioned being surprised by the 37K model designation due to the low mileage, which could hint at potential confusion about usage. Others, like @wanbid55, shared personal challenges that might prevent them from purchasing, while @JRPJR asked about possible exterior issues, showing a cautious approach amidst the overall enthusiasm. Nevertheless, these reservations seemed minimal in light of the vehicle's attributes and state.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its impressive condition and reliability. @DC_MotorWerks, the seller, affirms that this Sequoia has been meticulously maintained with only 54k miles and has undergone thorough preparations for the next owner. @CRUSH emphasizes the vehicle's capability as a family hauler and praises its off-road potential with the right tires. Other users like @lightstream and @zeeth2800 echo these sentiments, noting that the first-generation Sequoia is in good shape and appreciating the value it brings as a well-preserved example.
Neutral: Several commenters express cautious interest, particularly regarding the rust situation due to the vehicle's history in snow states. @P_s_carpenter and @MasterMarine acknowledge concerns about rust but also recognize that with proper maintenance, many similar vehicles remain in excellent condition. @ManningP seeks clarification about possible surface rust seen in a photo, while others, including @plemare and @giagnt2w, inquire about specific aspects of the vehicle's service history and prior minor damage mentioned in the CarFax report. @Grimacega asks if all systems function properly, expecting transparency from the seller.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism and concerns about the vehicle's overall condition and reliability. @P_s_carpenter makes a sarcastic remark about the vehicle being a 'POS' despite its appeal to some buyers. @Somemedic criticizes Toyota's handling of rust issues in their older models, though later expresses a more favorable view of the seller based on previous experiences. @Toygoata raises questions about the paint quality and minor accidents reported in the history, asking for additional documentation to assure potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @kaeferkaufer remarks on the unique Safari-Look of the vehicle, highlighting the presence of sugar scoops which adds to its distinctive appearance. @PaulGri compliments the beautiful job done on the interior, indicating overall satisfaction with the aesthetic improvements. @GatorDMD echoes this by appreciating the cool build and wishing the seller good luck, suggesting a favorable impression of the vehicle's design.
Neutral: @ICandB raises a question about the limited slip differential, prompting @daviduccio to elaborate humorously about the vehicle's performance while speculating on its features. @URW seeks clarification about possibly three different colors of white on the vehicle, with @autocentroimports (The Seller) patiently addressing queries about the color variation and providing insights on the vehicle's conditions and parts, showing engagement in the discussion.
Negative: @GrigioF430 points out some imperfections in the vehicle's condition, noting that it's a bit
|
 |
Positive: @Benzo93 (The Seller) shares excitement about the 996 Porsche 911, noting its excellent driving condition after personally bringing it home from a dealership. He highlights that the car is above average for its mileage, with a solid exterior and underside, but does mention minor interior wear such as a discolored radio button. He reassures potential buyers that the vehicle has never seen snow or salt and has a rare dual-row IMS that typically does not fail, which adds to the assurance of its reliability.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @magguu and @dabus, request additional photos and videos to assess the vehicle further. @Erroro_repair12 inquires about the car's certification and applicable taxes for Canadian bidders, receiving a prompt response from @Benzo93 (The Seller). The seller is prepared to meet requests for further car evaluations, including undercarriage videos and service reports, indicating openness and engagement with prospective buyers.
Negative: There are concerns raised by @Erroro_repair12 and @dabus about the lack of proof regarding potential replacements of critical components like the IMS or RMS, which can lead to costly repairs. Additionally, @srs71 illustrates apprehension about tax implications when exporting the vehicle to the U.S. The seller acknowledges these challenges but explains that he can provide information that may help navigate these sales processes, reflecting a proactive but cautious approach to addressing buyers' worries.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments expressed admiration for the truck's distinct Lunar Green color and its overall character. @rthans noted the appeal of the vehicle's patina, while @Culpthm1 praised the color combination as one of the best. @BFTdude highlighted the impressive presentation of the truck and appreciated specific details like the vice grip handle on the power steering dipstick. Commentors shared a sense of nostalgia, with @Hackberry stating they love the truck, and @snelson sharing a positive comparison with their similar 1967 truck, which they enjoy using for various purposes.
Neutral: There were some informative comments about the truck's maintenance and condition. The Seller provided detailed descriptions of repairs made, including the brake line, front end linkage, and transmission rebuild, which helped clarify potential concerns for prospective buyers. @vwbus1979 humorously noted the Seller's candid take on the truck's 'advanced safety feature' related to floor corrosion, and acknowledged the dash electrical issues are likely fixable. The comments reflected a mix of appreciation for the truck's quirks and recognition of its needs.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's condition. The Seller mentioned some issues, such as non-functioning gauges, a challenging driver's side window regulator, and advanced corrosion on the driver's side floor. @Patrick humorously pointed out the unconventional charm of the listing, indicating it may not be up to typical standards. Overall, while there was a lot of love for the truck, the comments revealed a need for repairs and upkeep that potential bidders should consider.
|
Fuel-Injected, 350-Powered 1956 Ford F900 Big Job Passenger Conversion
F90K6H71974
Lot 222708
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, referring to it as a "cool" and "spectacular" ride, with @boaboyoz exclaiming its appeal and suitability for hosting sports teams. @ajhyman praised its setup, while @Catana246 appreciated its beauty and unique drivetrain. The vehicle was noted as an ideal parade rig, and @Middler89 highlighted its cool factor. @autogal found it beautiful and inquired about specifications like cruising speed and length. The seller, @TishRoach2025, shared that it comfortably cruises at 55-60 mph and is 24 feet long, effectively building excitement around its capabilities and history of use in parades.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the vehicle's potential modifications and uses. @BigRedRivi suggested removing seating and seatbelts due to liability concerns, while @24kCaddyman envisioned it as a functional parade truck for festive occasions. @TishRoach2025 described it being used for a Junior Champion baseball team in a Christmas parade, emphasizing its charming history. Additional inquiries on technical aspects included @governmentmodel45 asking about the transmission model and @maga17 wondering about its reliability for long-distance travel. The seller reassured potential buyers about the truck's transmission and comfort for road trips, although it has primarily been used for local shows and parades.
Negative: Some comments hinted at concerns regarding the vehicle's performance and condition. @FordinaFord critiqued the engine choice as uninspired and mentioned that various engine swaps could have been more exciting. @governmentmodel45 expressed concerns over the lack of details regarding the old parts, questioning what components would accompany the sale. There was also a mention of a scraping sound noted by @racecardaddy during a drive-by video, raising potential doubts about the vehicle's immediate operational readiness. Furthermore, @TishRoach2025 admitted that the vehicle had been sitting for about a year, which may have contributed to noise issues, although she assured that it was likely just the springs.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed a strong appreciation for the vehicle's attractive color combination, which many considered a standout feature. @Gopher428 highlighted that it presents a solid platform for improvements, suggesting it offers an excellent opportunity for those looking for a classic at a reasonable price. Others, like @Hoppy18, showed optimism about the auction process and the support from the seller’s team, indicating that the vehicle is of interest to many potential buyers. The general sentiment reflects an understanding that, while the car requires some work, its desirability as a collector's item remains high, making it a worthwhile investment for enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions about the vehicle's condition and authenticity, suggesting the need for clarity on specific mechanical details. @Burton inquired about potential issues such as rust, AC functionality, and electrical concerns, seeking assurance that the car is in working order. Others, like @jimhyc, requested details on the engine specifications and components, indicating that more information would help potential bidders make informed decisions. The seller, @1600VeloceAssist, responded to these queries, stating that most important details would be disclosed and that all questions are being addressed promptly, which fosters a sense of transparency in the auction process.
Negative: Criticism emerged regarding the level of detail provided in the listing, with @Coralsnake pointing out that buyers should not expect new car quality from a vehicle that is over 50 years old. Some commenters, including @shelbymann70, warned that buyers should have the car inspected to avoid unexpected expenses post-purchase, as older cars can often hide significant issues. Additionally, @rmurphy1990 brought attention to discrepancies in attributes like stripe colors and incorrect placements, hinting that potential restoration needs might not be fully disclosed. Despite the enthusiasm for the vehicle, these concerns underscore the importance of thorough diligence when considering a classic car purchase.
|
 |
Positive: The 2008 Porsche Cayenne S is highly praised for its immaculate condition and low mileage, showing only 30k kilometers (approximately 18k miles). @Descanuck remarked on the vehicle's overall maintenance, indicating that it reflects the exceptional standards typical of Japanese-market cars. The seller, @Tnbusiness71, highlighted that the previous owner took great care of the vehicle, having performed recent maintenance that included a fuel injector service and replacement of all eight spark plugs. There is also reassurance that there are no signs of bore scoring or abnormalities in the transfer case, further enhancing its appeal for potential buyers.
Neutral: Many commenters, including @CharlieB. and @HerbDaddy, expressed inquiries regarding the vehicle's registration and importation process to the U.S. The seller, @Tnbusiness71, elaborated on the complexities involved, noting that the vehicle lacks the required EPA stickers and would need to be federalized for registration. The option to obtain a compliance letter from Porsche corporate could simplify this process. Additionally, there were discussions on the vehicle's infotainment system language and the capability to switch it to English, which may require additional work by the future owner.
Negative: Concerns were raised by multiple users regarding potential issues with importing the vehicle into the U.S. @GT3R pointed out that ZZZ VINs cannot be registered in the U.S. unless they are 25 years or older or go through a difficult DOT process, making it potentially difficult for interested buyers. @camfrengo specifically asked about the vehicle's bore scoring but was reassured by the seller that extensive inspections found no concerning issues. However, some commenters expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition and the complicated import process, which could deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters like @GDogg praised the vehicle as a "Fantastic 500E," highlighting its appeal. @collectorsupport, the seller, emphasized the car's significance, noting its unique combination of design and engineering, especially with the M119 V8 engine and Porsche revisions. The seller also detailed the extensive care the vehicle has received, including regular maintenance and updates such as the replacement of the upper and lower engine harnesses and the recent transmission rebuild, showcasing the vehicle's mechanical soundness. Additionally, the car's interior condition was commended, with only minor issues, indicating that it has been well maintained.
Neutral: Several comments addressed specific technical aspects of the vehicle, such as @Baddogdesmo inquiring about the replacement of the main wire loom, which @goshi quickly addressed by referencing the seller's write-up. Others like @Mmaqel raised questions regarding the authenticity of the headlights, which were confirmed by the seller as genuine Euro headlights. A discussion about the timing chain, guides, and tensioners ensued, with @SockPuppet providing insight into their maintenance, and the seller clarified the current status of these components and the absence of any issues based on professional assessments.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle were voiced, particularly regarding some exterior blemishes characterized as rock chips and webbing in the paint, making it a less than perfect example for a collector. @RKS65 questioned the condition of the timing chain and guide rails, pointing out that these could pose potential issues in terms of wear and maintenance history. The seller admitted a lack of recent records on the guide rails but reassured that no signs of problems were currently evident based on expert evaluations and operation during cold starts and driving tests.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the desirability of the Volvo XC90. @GeraldZ mentions that the vehicle looks very clean and expresses admiration for its features, indicating that as an owner of a 2010 model, he finds this 2011 version appealing. Additionally, @aegmotorsports, the seller, provides detailed descriptions of the vehicle's features, such as the all-wheel-drive system, climate package, and various electronics, all of which enhance the perceived value and functionality of the vehicle.
Neutral: There are some clarifications regarding the model year of the vehicle. @GeraldZ notes that although the car was factory delivered in June 2010, it is sold as a 2011 model, which is standard practice if a vehicle is sold after June of a given year. @aegmotorsports confirms the model year but also points out that there are no additional maintenance records available other than what is provided via the Carfax and the original window sticker.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns over the lack of maintenance records, which may be a red flag for potential buyers. @GeraldZ questions the information provided by the seller, indicating a misunderstanding about the vehicle’s history and model year. The back-and-forth between @GeraldZ and the seller, @aegmotorsports, suggests some confusion or skepticism about the vehicle's background, which could potentially deter interest from buyers looking for a fully documented history.
|
 |
Positive: @sjmst praised the vehicle, highlighting its cleanliness and originality, as well as noting the benefit of the 1980 fuel injection for reliability. @krosa2112 expressed nostalgia and appreciation for the car, calling it a fantastic Spider and commenting on its unique color and thorough documentation. @lane11motors from the Seller actively engaged with commenters, thanking them for their feedback and confirming the car's original features, including its speedometer and rustproofing history.
Neutral: @jberth1 provided constructive criticism on the quality of the photos, suggesting that clear images are essential for remote buyers. They also inquired about the speedometer's history and repainting details, which were clarified by @lane11motors, affirming that the factory speedometer is original and providing context about past repaints. Additionally, @msrichmond noted the documentation of the car's features concerning the moldings, with @lane11motors providing further confirmation and updates.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's details, such as @David_P questioning the availability of specific tire sizes, while @bakes88 inquired about the timing belt's replacement schedule. @sax61 mentioned the potential shipping costs to the East Coast being prohibitive. Furthermore, @mownhoj's comment was flagged as non-constructive, indicating a range of expressions from skepticism to indecision regarding the car's purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @cphanes78 expresses gratitude for the opening bid, noting the appealing nature of the auction. @expletive compliments the vehicle, highlighting its solid drivetrain and unique half doors, wishing good luck to the auction. GCEA (The Seller) shares enthusiasm about the Jeep's performance, emphasizing its great looks and driving capabilities, and promises videos to showcase these qualities. Numerous bidders like @fsacb3 and @jonathanp441 praise the build and driving experience, suggesting the vehicle has both style and performance.
Neutral: The comments feature inquiries about various vehicle specifics, such as @HerbDaddy asking about highway performance and the operability of 4-wheel drive. @Goose2004 inquires about the gas filler opening, while @Deerkiller requests pictures of the side frame and expresses interest in driving videos, to which GCEA (The Seller) promptly responds, providing the information requested. The Seller also discusses features like the presence of hard doors and a functional heating system, noting that while the Jeep lacks A/C, the heat works well.
Negative: There are limited negative comments, with @fsacb3 remarking about the lack of a stereo, which might detract from the overall experience. Additionally, concerns might arise about the absence of air conditioning, as highlighted by @HerbDaddy. However, GCEA (The Seller) addresses concerns effectively, reassuring potential buyers about the vehicle's quality and performance in other areas.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous positive comments highlighting its pristine condition and desirability. @RCMotor (The Seller) expressed pride in offering a like-new 2024 911 Dakar with less than 850 miles, noting its well-maintained status and ready-to-enjoy nature. @ElVerde and @RedArcadia complimented the car's status as a Carfax certified one-owner vehicle, with @ElVerde expressing hope that the new owner truly utilizes the vehicle. Enthusiasts like @Submoose mentioned their enjoyment in daily driving the Dakar, suggesting that it performs well on current roads, enhancing the overall driving experience.
Neutral: Several comments acknowledged the mixed purpose of the 911 Dakar, with @BigT77 pointing out its conflict as an off-road homage while possessing luxury features. Commenters like @Dollycat3 and @Stevebow17 shared practical considerations regarding the vehicle's mileage, suggesting that low miles can reflect ownership rather than lack of use. @B.Fryk provided a statistical insight into Dakar auction trends, noting that just a small percentage of these cars have been driven over 1,000 miles, raising the point that owning such a vehicle often results in it being more a collector's item than a daily driver.
Negative: There were some negative sentiments expressed, particularly regarding the likelihood of the vehicle being driven as intended. @Hoppy18 questioned the auction's logistics and relationships, while @GlHatWFO indicated a hesitance to bid based on the current mileage. @DentalFlossTycoon focused on potential additional costs associated with the car, while @TexasMule expressed concern about the decals possibly being permanently applied, showcasing a level of trepidation about ownership reluctance. Ultimately, @Jwolfgangk highlighted the dichotomy between ownership and enjoyment within the luxury sports car market, suggesting that many owners may not fully experience the vehicles' capabilities.
|
Fuel-Injected, 454-Powered 1955 Chevrolet 3100 Custom “King” Cab Big-Window Pickup
H255B033107
Lot 222717
Private Party
 |
Positive: @DRIVEGUY highlighted the vehicle as a "very sweet ride!" while @LesJohn complimented the phenomenal dashboard and rad steering wheel, praising the overall build quality. @wannabid55 also echoed the sentiment of a great build, referring to the truck as beautiful and well put together.
Neutral: @DJW48 raised a concern about a missing paint area over the grill and asked if the hood rubs, suggesting it might be an easy fix. @jkterra12 (The Seller) clarified that the hood does not rub and it was just an issue that was not addressed in a timely manner. Additionally, @jkterra12 responded to questions about the passenger door, confirming it does not need any attention and is functioning properly.
Negative: @bigjohnmm questioned if the passenger door shut all the way, hinting at a potential issue. @TheAxman noted a wire hanging down, speculating about the trickle charger for the battery and asking about its location. This indicates some concerns regarding the vehicle's condition that may need attention.
|
 |
Positive: @MokeLongIsland provided reassuring details about the vehicle, confirming its original MSO and the availability of documents for DMV registration. The vehicle has been owned since new, and they explained the battery exchange, stating that the lead acid battery did not hold charge, which is a proactive step for maintaining the car's functionality. Additionally, they mentioned that the car now operates at a top speed of 30 mph with a range of 60 miles, highlighting an improvement in charging convenience with a plug connection to an outlet.
Neutral: Commenters such as @RetiredCarDealer and @60Bugeye sought clarification on the vehicle's status and specifics regarding its battery. Questions were raised about whether the car had been sold and the installation date of the new battery, showing that potential buyers are interested in the details and additional warranties that may be included with the purchase.
Negative: @AVL_Paul and @AntCrooks raised concerns about the vehicle's condition, particularly noting the presence of red rust on the undercarriage despite having only 23 miles, which they questioned as a sign of neglect or further issues. @AntCrooks specifically reacted to the rust, suggesting it looked severe and wondered if the vehicle had been adequately stored, indicating a level of skepticism regarding the seller's assurances about the surface nature of the rust.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz expresses appreciation for the vehicle by describing it as a charming C20 and wishing the seller good luck with the transaction. @LesJohn mentions the nice upgrades the truck has, including the tachometer and a unique Pepsi bottle opener, showing interest in the motor and transmission details. @Old_Phart asks about the possibility of a driving video to showcase the vehicle's functions, indicating a positive curiosity about the truck's performance.
Neutral: @JohininFlorida inquires about the heater and defrost equipment under the dash, particularly noting the missing control slides, which demonstrates a practical interest in the vehicle's features. @SDthomas asks whether the truck has been clear coated, reflecting a neutral stance likely aimed at understanding the vehicle's condition and maintenance.
Negative: @Drumsnspace offers a critical perspective, noting issues with the gauge cluster, such as a broken odometer and a stuck speedometer, and expresses concern over the low oil pressure reading, highlighting potential problems with the truck that may need attention. @adamnsteph (The Seller) responds to some of these concerns, explaining that while most gauges work properly once driving, the temperature gauge is not functioning, suggesting that some issues still exist despite the restoration.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the unique color combination of the vehicle, highlighting how rare and eye-catching it is. @Chuck_price noted that it might be the only one with this specific color combo, while @MTH and @Mirthmobile expressed excitement over the colors, with the latter calling the car "epic". @cgentile (The Seller) shared that they tried hard to find another like it, but could not, further reinforcing its uniqueness. @Gmmuscleusa echoed this sentiment, stating the color combo is much cooler than the typical colors found on such cars. Additionally, @Pcleez commented on the positive vibes associated with the car being a significant gift for @cgentile's mother.
Neutral: Some comments provided neutral observations about the vehicle's condition and features. @Uby67vw1958 inquired about the check engine light, which @cgentile (The Seller) explained relates to an EEP2 error that affects gauge functionality, particularly when cold. This technical issue sparked discussions among other users, like @GoldMember, who shared their experience with similar problems and offered troubleshooting tips. @cgentile also mentioned replacing the battery to see if it would resolve the issue, indicating an ongoing concern but not a decisive negative reflection on the vehicle itself. @NMDatsunguy expressed an interest in seeing the car in person, indicating that it's still well-regarded despite the issues.
Negative: On the negative side, the vehicle does have some mechanical challenges that potential buyers are concerned about. The persistent EEP2 error code, which affects gauge functionality, was a topic of concern for multiple users, with @Uby67vw1958 and @GoldMember discussing possible fixes. @SOLO67 expressed skepticism about the vehicle needing tires and whether it could be confidently driven across the country. Additionally, @cgentile noted the gauges only work after the car has warmed up, which might deter some buyers. Despite these challenges, @cgentile remains hopeful about the car's roadworthiness, stating they would not hesitate to drive it long distances.
|
 |
Positive: @SWHobbs (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a super nice suburban that is very clean and well cared for. Furthermore, @SWHobbs (The Seller) emphasizes that the tires are brand new, having just been installed, which adds to the overall appeal of the vehicle. The seller also mentions that the Suburban has received regular service at a local Chevrolet dealer, indicating a history of proper maintenance.
Neutral: @BNed inquires about the details from the Carfax reports regarding the multiple cluster inspections, seeking clarification about what aspects were being examined. They also ask whether the front or rear bumper was replaced or simply repaired after accidents. In response, @SWHobbs (The Seller) states they are unsure about the cluster inspections and that while the front bumper has been painted, they believe that the hood and fenders remain untouched, and no visible signs indicate the rear has been worked on.
Negative: @BNed raises a concern about potential issues with the vehicle's 4 Hi and 4 low cycling. In response, @SWHobbs (The Seller) assures that there are no issues and that the vehicle shifts as it should in all positions. However, the initial inquiry by @BNed suggests some reluctance or worry about the vehicle's reliability in that aspect.
|
 |
Positive: @Bowtienut praised the vehicle as a 'Sweet ride' expected to perform well, while @ssterry described it as 'really nice' and complimented its classic and classy appearance, especially in black. @UncleBaldy added that the vehicle speaks for itself and expressed interest in it. Other comments highlight the vehicle's beauty, with @LH3726 noting that it appears rust-free and @Gsee mentioning that it drives and rides excellently. @delivery57 (The Seller) provided detailed information confirming no rust or body defects, emphasizing the high quality of the car with major upgrades and how well it performs, often winning trophies at car shows, reflecting its popularity among enthusiasts.
Neutral: @delivery57 (The Seller) addressed specific questions about the vehicle's air conditioning system, stating it worked properly as of August 2025 with potential additional refrigerant needed by spring. He also provided extensive technical specifications about the Chevrolet Performance ZZ6 crate motor and the Dakota Digital RTX gauges, showcasing the vehicle's enhanced capabilities and features. The seller detailed its history, production numbers from 1957, and the comfort of its interior, making it a practical choice for enthusiasts.
Negative: There were no significant negative comments about the vehicle. However, @Wray inquired about the air conditioner's functionality, indicating concern over proper operation. @delivery57 (The Seller) promptly responded, alleviating some of those worries by assuring that the AC had been functioning well. The only issue mentioned was the small paint blemishes near the liftgate, which the seller noted could be touched up.
|
 |
Positive: @Beans_Bacon expressed excitement about the vehicle, indicating it will be a special Christmas present for his wife. @Gmmuscleusa praised the truck's clean build and the retention of the older grill design, highlighting it as a good-looking truck. @boaboyoz also complimented the vibrant Summit White color and the overall quality of the build, referring to it as 'dynamite.' @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) emphasized the truck's strong performance, exceptional sound, and its ability to turn heads, assuring potential bidders that they will not be disappointed.
Neutral: @HerbDaddy inquired about the functionality of the air conditioning and heating, as well as technical details regarding rear gears and the truck's highway drivability. @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) confirmed that the truck has 3:42 rear gears, that both heating and A/C work properly, and noted that it performed well in the Arizona summer. Multiple commenters, including @wannabid55 and @ShirtPants, asked for additional information, such as shipping options and the availability of a running video of the truck, indicating a certain level of interest in the auction.
Negative: @lordbond questioned why the vehicle was equipped with lap belts instead of shoulder belts, to which @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) responded that the owner preferred the aesthetic of the lap belts. Additionally, @bringatrailer mentioned that an older photo of the engine had been removed from the listing, which could raise concerns about the completeness of the information available to potential buyers. @ruracing1 specifically noted the absence of cruise control and tilt steering, which some might view as drawbacks in terms of features.
|
 |
Positive: @Vw.dodge mentions that the vehicle has a little character and appreciates seeing it available, indicating a nostalgic value associated with classic trucks. @Weitkampf600f100s (The Seller) has provided information about the vehicle's drivetrain and previous ownership, which helps potential buyers understand its history better and instills confidence in the truck's performance. The interaction with potential buyers shows a willingness on the seller's part to engage and provide insight into the vehicle's condition and modifications, promoting a communal appreciation for classic restoration projects.
Neutral: Comments from @Wboanna1 inquire about the vehicle's ability to handle longer trips and the condition of its tires and engine heat. The seller responds detailing the truck's current performance and upkeep needs, such as the necessity of new front tires for long-distance travel and confirming that the truck does not run hot. The request for further information indicates that potential buyers are evaluating the practicality of the vehicle for their needs, showing a serious interest while also outlining the restoration aspects of the truck.
Negative: @surf describes the truck as treading the line of being a "project" and reflects a more critical view by using the term "Jolopy" to emphasize its need for significant restoration. This sentiment highlights that while some see character in the vehicle, others recognize it as needing work to be roadworthy, possibly deterring some buyers who may not be ready for a restoration project. @delson59 points out the missing rear bumper, which adds to the vehicle's incomplete status, further supporting the notion that it requires substantial investment before it can be fully enjoyed.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its outstanding features and aesthetics. @MJP2021 describes the car as 'Gorgeous!' and emphasizes its well-optioned status, expressing excitement over its specifications. @mbartholome appreciates the expensive interior options saying it is well worth it for such a spectacular build. @MohrImports and @Rustler both comment on the gorgeous interior, further accentuating the vehicle's appealing design. Comments from @deichenb reveal a personal connection to the car, sharing fond memories tied to its build and experiences, and confirming the love and care that has gone into its condition. Overall, the vehicle is lauded for its design, color, interior, and performance attributes, with many commenters expressing awe and admiration.
Neutral: Several comments raise inquiries and requests for details about the vehicle, indicating a moderate interest in its history and specifications. @Dan-Omite asks for specifics about an accident, while @adcampo requests details on the 'Special Custom Tailoring' option, showing curiosity about the car's unique features. @flat6mood's query regarding paintwork also suggests an interest in the quality and specifics of repairs performed. @Pinkbunny seeks clarification on damage repair, indicating a desire for assurance regarding the car's condition. The responses often indicate the seller's willingness to provide additional information and clarity on these points, showing engagement with potential buyers and sharing insights about the car's features.
Negative: On the downside, some comments express concerns about the vehicle's price. @sy1616 notes that the pricing seems high, comparing it to sub-1,000 mile cars at similar price points, and suggests that Porsche is losing its allure due to price hikes. @Common_Cents and others mention the need for clarity surrounding the vehicle's prior damage and repairs, indicating a lack of transparency that could deter some buyers. Additionally, @LegalBill questions the paint color's metallic quality, revealing potential confusion among prospective purchasers about this aspect. Overall, the feedback conveys hesitance regarding the price and the authenticity of the car's involved history.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the beauty and craftsmanship of the 1964 Catalina 2+2, with many users praising its stunning appearance and attention to detail. @stg83 noted how impressive the car looks and expressed excitement about upcoming videos. @boaboyoz described the vehicle as a "killer Cali Catalina" and praised its outstanding build, while @Roger.in.PA referred to it as a "bad ass Pontiac". @knulp fondly recalled memories from high school, emphasizing the car's beauty, and @RandyP63 even rated it as one of the nicest cars on the market this year, commending its craftsmanship and finish.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a balanced perspective on the vehicle, acknowledging its strengths while expressing some technical inquiries. @mlazarus asked about the drum brakes and received confirmation from the seller that the car came with a front disk brake conversion. @nmoreilly02 discussed concerns over the hood styling, sharing information about hood clearance related to engine modifications. @Pfeil and @faststock123 both suggested potential adjustments that could be made to the vehicle, indicating interest in its performance enhancements and modifications.
Negative: Some users have expressed criticism regarding certain aspects of the car. @robertb1958 mentioned it needs more power, and both @faststock123 and @nmoreilly02 shared their less favorable opinions about the hood, suggesting changes could improve aesthetics and performance. @CWOUSMC wanted the car to be more stock, while @2caddiesandaMach1 hinted at the possibility of opting for different intakes in hopes of lowering power loss. Notably, @SSN-685 humorously highlighted potential concerns with the vehicle's braking system, showcasing some skepticism about the car's handling given its power level.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle. @Lc4dakar noted it has "great bones" and plenty of good options, while @spenny suggested it would look awesome restored or simply driven as is. @WAGONBOYTD praised the charming paint job and highlighted the vehicle's unique character, mentioning that it hasn't attracted many followers in the United States. Other enthusiasts, like @saab4ben and @telwyn, shared their love for lightweights, with the latter pointing out that it should make a buyer very happy given the auction conditions.
Neutral: Several users asked about logistical details regarding the vehicle's title and condition. @metoo sought clarification on the title transfer process, and @Mwitchek inquired about the location of the chassis number plate. @TheMurse requested documentation about service history, cold start videos, and clearer chassis photos. The seller, @Farshadyazdi, provided information about the vehicle's electrical system and indicated that it is currently being titled in Virginia after initially being in Florida.
Negative: However, not all comments were positive; @Paulw1834 contested the electrical configuration of the vehicle, insisting it could not be a 24v system based on the battery placement and speculations around its service history. @TheMurse also raised concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, noting that it has been outdoors and questioning the lack of service records. Additionally, @Farshadyazdi acknowledged local feedback about the vehicle's weak brakes while attempting to assure potential buyers of its overall great running condition.
|
 |
Positive: @CarDogThreePedals noted that these first-year wheels have aged well over 45 years, pointing out their rarity in the 14x7 size and the appealing options available on the vehicle. This information highlights the unique features of the car that make it a collector's item. Additionally, @khart (The Seller) shared that the car has been minimally driven since 1989, with only 4100 miles added to the original 10,000, confirming its low mileage and preserved condition.
Neutral: @gb70 inquired about various features such as the functionality of the AC and the 8-track player, demonstrating interest in the operational aspects of the vehicle. There were also requests for videos showing a walkaround and cold start, which suggests a desire for more visual confirmation of the car's condition. Furthermore, several commenters, including @BARNFINDSS and @JayKay2430, raised technical points regarding the VIN discrepancies and repainting details, acknowledging that these issues could impact the car's registration and perceived authenticity but not outright condemning the vehicle.
Negative: @BARNFINDSS pointed out a significant discrepancy regarding the VIN, indicating potential registration issues that could arise due to mismatched information, which may discourage potential buyers. @gb70 echoed these concerns about the VIN, emphasizing that such issues could cause problems in various states. Additionally, concerns about the car's paint, with indications it may have been repainted, were raised by @gb70, who suggested that measurements could be acquired to verify the original paint status and possible issues with the clear coat.
|
 |
Positive: @Boombox44 expressed excitement, referring to the vehicle as a "bucket list rig" and commenting on its beauty. @Namoper also praised the truck's condition, calling it a "very clean survivor". @waburchill1 voiced a nostalgic wish to see such a simple truck offered by modern automakers, highlighting its straightforward features like a 4-speed and roll-up windows. @TitanBloomer specifically pointed out the impressive straightness and cleanliness of the bed inside the truck, while @IHTimmy echoed the sentiment by calling it beautiful.
Neutral: @Tiecesdad asked about the vehicle's location in Oregon, to which @Namoper responded by pointing out that the listing mentions Klamath Falls. @Todler5518, the seller, confirmed their location and provided additional context about Klamath Falls' dry climate, explaining that the truck has spent its life in an area with low rainfall. The seller also noted plans to upload videos of the truck starting and driving soon, acknowledging a recent comment by @NachoDaddy007 that expressed interest in this information.
Negative: @NachoDaddy007 raised concerns about oil leaks, asking for more details. @Todler5518 addressed these concerns, explaining the presence of oil drips from two locations: the rear of the engine and the rear end, detailing potential sources of these leaks. The seller assured that neither leak is substantial but acknowledged their existence, which may deter some potential buyers. Additionally, @Todler5518 apologized for the poor quality of a video they uploaded, indicating a loss of resolution during the process.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the 1935 Ford 3-Window coupe, with enthusiasts like @treepeddler expressing their awe at the car's history, particularly noting its purchase during WWII. @ClydeWmoss described the vehicle as "stunning" and referred to it as "rolling art," emphasizing its beauty and perfection. Other users, like @Ninko50, simply stated the car is beautiful, while @57charlie praised the professional photo shoot, indicating the high-quality presentation of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on specific features of the car, such as @atomic8 inquiring about the original transmission and @lovecars asking about the brake system. @2011SLSAMG questioned the car's finish and potential overheating issues, demonstrating a desire for more detailed information to better understand the car's condition and performance. @CASHCROPPERS and @mcj4250 also requested more information and photos to assess the car's state before restoration and its finish, respectively.
Negative: There were some concerns expressed about the car's finish and functionality, specifically @2011SLSAMG's inquiry about overheating problems and the effect of the finish. While the seller, @arkbuildernoah, addressed these queries, indicating the car runs cool and has a gloss finish despite reflections, the initial questions suggest that not all potential buyers are entirely convinced about the vehicle's operational status. Any lingering doubts from commenters regarding the restoration process and overall condition were likely influenced by the lack of pre-restoration photos.
|
 |
Positive: @MGAMOD1960 (The Seller) provided a comprehensive overview of the vehicle, describing it as a great truck while mentioning a medical reason for the sale. Several commenters, including @The_Fed, expressed their support for the seller's health and conveyed goodwill towards the auction. The seller also agreed to provide a driving video, indicating openness and a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Neutral: Commenters sought additional information about the vehicle's history and condition, such as detailed service records and specifics about the oil changes. @bordord7254 and others inquired about the mechanical integrity, functionality of electronics, and any exterior imperfections. The seller responded to these inquiries promptly, clarifying that there were no known mechanical issues and confirming the functioning of all electronics, although noting a scratch on the tailgate.
Negative: A few concerns were raised regarding the absence of a trailer hitch, and @Chevrolet84 specifically asked if there was anything wrong with the truck. The seller confirmed the lack of a trailer hitch but also emphasized that he was unaware of any major issues with the vehicle. Overall, while there were some queries about the truck's condition, the tone remained focused on gathering necessary information rather than voicing outright complaints.
|
 |
Positive: @Sierra_Classic_Sportscar noted the rarity and significance of the 107026 450 SLC 5.0, highlighting its history as a homologation car for WRC, adding depth to its appeal. @bpeverest, an owner of an earlier model, expressed admiration for the vehicle's color and characteristics, emphasizing its fantastic nature as a classic. Similarly, @BlitzLead reminisced about the exceptional driving experience these cars offer, describing them as true Autobahn cruisers. The seller, @kindahippyish, has shared their experience with the vehicle, mentioning maintenance and its history, reinforcing the vehicle's cherished status among enthusiasts and collectors alike.
Neutral: Several comments discussed technical aspects and historical details about the car. @revron raised questions regarding the aluminum parts of the car, while other users shared insights on the suspension height and potential replacement of parts. @dubdlux found the mix of electric and hand-crank windows interesting, indicating a blend of modern and classic features in the car. The seller, @kindahippyish, promptly replied to inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and offered a transparent account of its condition and modifications made during their ownership, maintaining a professional but casual tone in discussions regarding the vehicle's history.
Negative: Concerns were raised about certain features and conditions of the Mercedes-Benz, notably the delamination of the rear window, which @wdbcoupe labeled as unfortunate, suggesting it might affect the restoration efforts. Some commenters, like @BD450SL and @wdbcoupe, highlighted their reservations about missing serial numbers and inconsistent maintenance history, which could undermine the vehicle’s value. They also noted that significant details need photographing and verification to ensure the car's originality and integrity, along with the implications of the color change that might diminish its market value, as pointed out by @BD450SL.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters express admiration for the vehicle, noting its rarity and restoration quality. One user, @tobyallen, states that it is a "knockout example" of a post coupe with factory OEM Ram Air, highlighting the car's aesthetic appeal and functional design. @1saville, the seller, reinforces this sentiment by mentioning the vehicle's excellent driving condition after a recent 40-mile test drive, emphasizing its solid, original drivetrain and inviting potential buyers for inspections.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding the authenticity of certain components, particularly concerning the original carburetor and any documentation. User @reece20169 questions the carb's originality, while @gtjoey1314 asks about the availability of a protective plate or paperwork. @sigma76 raises a notable concern about the use of the term "example" in the car listing, implying that it might not fully represent the authenticity expected of a W-32, although @1saville assures that it is indeed a genuine model.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism about the car's sale due to the absence of original documentation, which is pivotal in establishing the vehicle's authenticity. User @carman55 notes that without documentation, it's difficult to validate the car's authenticity, while @sigma76 echoes this concern, suggesting that potential buyers should be cautious. Additionally, comments from users like @dickiee and @heatmup raise concerns about the age of the tires, questioning their condition, which could affect the car's overall appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, highlighting its rarity and stunning condition. @boaboyoz called it a "righteous red Thunderbird" and expressed enthusiasm for the auction. @yay expressed jealousy towards the future owner, complimenting the car as incredible, while @RocketBird described it as "absolutely dreamy." Moreover, @Dollycat3 found the car to be stunning, elegant, and timeless, contributing to the positive sentiment surrounding its appearance and desirability.
Neutral: Throughout the discussion, several participants asked for clarifications and details about specific features of the car, showing a reasonable interest in its specifications. @atomic8 inquired whether the body panels were all steel and confirmed with @AuthenticAuctions (The Seller) that they were indeed all steel and functional gauges. @TJClassic sought clarification on the description of the suspension and chassis overhaul, where @AuthenticAuctions provided a detailed explanation about the restoration process. These exchanges indicate a constructive interaction among passionate car enthusiasts with a focus on ensuring accurate information.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about potential inaccuracies in the listing and specific features related to the vehicle. @Maltese_Falcon pointed out a possible error regarding the inclusion of a tachometer, and @earlebird questioned the presence of features typically associated with the M code roadster. Additionally, @TJClassic expressed frustration about the need for clarification on the seat adjustments and requested more photographic evidence regarding the top and seat mechanisms. @V10hooked also requested verification of engine components and any existing discrepancies, signaling concerns about the car's authenticity.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the Nissan Atlas as "tiptop and rambunctious in red," expressing enthusiasm for the vehicle. @CKKurtz finds the truck quite appealing, imagining its potential transformations into different configurations, such as a flatbed or a Doka type. Additionally, @BostonCarGuy notes its unique qualities, such as being a virtually new 28-year-old work truck in outstanding condition, while @LLHVAC expresses a desire to own the vehicle.
Neutral: @JDMcarsFL (The Seller) responds to various questions, clarifying that everything on the truck is functioning properly and there are no rust issues, urging potential buyers to review uploaded photos. The seller also addresses queries about the vehicle's registration potential in California and whether it is all-wheel drive, confirming it is RWD. Furthermore, @JDMcarsFL updates potential bidders about the auction's impending conclusion, inviting questions and offering assistance for shipping if necessary.
Negative: @Wanker raises concerns about the truck's functionality and the presence of any rust, while @DELLACARS doubts the vehicle's 4WD capabilities. The comment from @Richardfettig seeking clarification on cruise control reveals a request for features that might not be included, and @unorganized asks for specific measurements and performance details, indicating potential buyers' need for more information before committing.
|
 |
Positive: @Oakhurst appreciates the early Chevrolet street rod for its authenticity, while @rickaz notes that the car resembles an oval track race car turned streetcar, which he finds appealing. @MichaelUSA compliments the car's interior, remarking on its cleanliness and beauty, particularly highlighting the bucket seats and instrument panel as impressive. He also acknowledges the challenging but well-executed mini-tub installation in the rear interior, expressing admiration for the overall appearance and modifications made to the vehicle.
Neutral: @GalenEsslinger, the seller, provides information about the car, including its history and the fact that it can be viewed by appointment in Wichita, Kansas. He mentions having only one engine side panel after losing the other during a move. @Hami888 inquires about the specifications of the rear axle and the transmission, to which @GalenEsslinger responds, indicating the rear is a Ford 9 inch but is uncertain of the ratio, and speculates that the transmission may be a Turbo 350.
Negative: @rhoyle questions if the description regarding the title carrying an Angelique brand is a typo, indicating some confusion or dissatisfaction with the way the title information is presented. @Jackbell expresses concern about the timeline for moving the car due to personal health issues after surgery, suggesting that the process may be a bit challenging for him. Overall, there seems to be a minor setback related to the title clarification and personal logistics for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received high praise from various commenters for its aesthetics and rarity. @mkiv808 describes it as "Beautiful," aligning with @BigT77's enthusiasm over its stunning color combination and low mileage, which creates a desirable mix for collectors. @adayes appreciates the vehicle's evolution from earlier models, highlighting its perfect transition to modernity, and @badcad believes its mileage makes it ideal for enjoyment while preserving value. The gated manual transmission is also celebrated, with @manofmanuals asserting that this feature will further drive the price up beyond $300k. Commenters note that this model represents one of the last Ferraris that perfectly balance design and performance, making them coveted collectibles.
Neutral: Several commenters have sought clarification on the vehicle's specifications and history, reflecting a genuine interest tempered with a practical mindset. @Tampanoll and @mike_747 raised questions about whether the manual transmission is factory original, indicating a desire for authenticity before potential bidding. @suncoastmotors inquired about recent service records, showing due diligence on the buyer's part, while @jcbw requested validation on sticky buttons and paint readings. @iLussoOC (The Seller) proactively addressed some concerns by confirming that the car is a factory gated manual and provided information on service inspections, demonstrating transparency and willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive sentiments, there are some cautionary notes regarding the vehicle's condition. @mike_747 pointed out that cracked exhaust headers are a common issue in these models, urging for evidence of inspection or repairs to avoid any unforeseen expenses. @jcbw also echoed this concern by asking about the status of sticky buttons and paint readings, which can indicate wear over time; and @RACEON demanded clarity on various aspects of the vehicle's health, including clutch life and header status. These comments suggest that while the vehicle is valued highly, potential buyers should be diligent and ensure it meets standards before proceeding with offers.
|
 |
Positive: @Rosie67 described the vehicle as pretty and expressed a desire to see it under her Christmas tree, hinting at its visual appeal. @GatorDMD referred to the car as a beauty and offered good luck, suggesting high regard. @JAY-Z praised an informative video featuring the original owner, noting that the car has no hidden issues, and @Caymanorcarrera highlighted the impressive documentation history of the car, stressing its rarity as a one-owner vehicle with substantial records. Overall, comments reflect admiration for the car's aesthetics, history, and perceived integrity.
Neutral: @notagain676 (The Seller) provided detailed insights about the vehicle, including information about its previous owner, paint details, and modifications. They engaged with various inquiries from potential buyers, addressing questions about seat fitting, paint codes, and the vehicle's history, emphasizing transparency in communication. Other comments designed to clarify the car's background, including discussions about the paint, trim, and specific modifications, illustrate the shared interest among participants regarding the vehicle's heritage and specifications.
Negative: @pfroede raised concerns about potential damage to the floor on the driver's side rear, inquiring about the extent of any surface scratches or penetration in the metal. @mark_99 pointed out possible issues concerning the car's hood alignment, mirroring worries about the vehicle's physical condition. Additionally, @Hary's question about the fender alignment issue reflected concerns typically associated with older vehicles, while @macleodm3 speculated about the trim options of similar models, hinting at possible inconsistency in the vehicle's original features.
|
 |
Positive: @PulseCheck expressed excitement about the vehicle, calling it a sweet ride and wishing good luck with the sale. @Proper1 provided a personal experience, affirming the car's classification as a GT by highlighting its features like the twin turbo V8 and comfort during long drives, mentioning a successful 20-hour journey in the car.
Neutral: Several commenters requested additional information about the vehicle, such as @MJC1962 and @SerottaD asking for a picture of the window sticker to understand the car’s options better, with @racelynk (The Seller) responding that they would try to track it down or contact McLaren for it. @Oldjeffy1 inquired about the presence of a glass roof, showing interest in the car's specifics.
Negative: @flyingdago raised a question regarding the vehicle's classification as a GT, implying skepticism about the use of the term. He also noted the absence of engine photos, which @bavarianstance explained by stating that the engine is positioned underneath a trunk in GT models, suggesting a limitation in providing such images. @majorfomo questioned the detail regarding an undershield repair, indicating potential concerns regarding the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Mckoon commented positively on the vehicle's appearance, stating it looks great and inquiring about the possibility of viewing it in person, indicating interest in the vehicle. Furthermore, @CMD1 (The Seller) actively engages with bidders and provides detailed answers to questions, showcasing a commitment to transparency and customer service by offering to schedule test drives and accommodating shipping estimates. The seller also emphasizes the cleanliness of the vehicle, confirming that it shows no signs of previous smoking and is in excellent condition, which could appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: @thudwill raised important questions about the vehicle's history, including the timing belt replacement and the limited mileage accumulated under current ownership, which @CMD1 (The Seller) clarified by explaining the timing belt's good condition and the vehicle's usage for preparatory purposes prior to sale. Both the seller and the buyers engage in back-and-forth discussions regarding shipping costs to various locations, indicating logistical considerations that are typical for online vehicle auctions. Additionally, @JDMESA and @jsloden made requests for further visual clarification of specific vehicle details, reflecting a practical approach to evaluating the car before bidding.
Negative: @thudwill expressed concerns over the vehicle's past ownership, questioning why the second owner had the car for only a short time and bringing up potential maintenance issues such as the timing belt. @jsloden commented that the spoiler might look out of place, which signals a subjective design critique that could influence potential buyers' perceptions about the vehicle's aesthetics. Although the overall sentiment is mostly positive, the inquiries reveal some hesitations among bidders regarding specific aspects of the vehicle's history and features that could be concerns for future buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have highlighted the unique features and overall appeal of the Grigio Titanio 360 Modena, particularly praising its sunroof option and manual transmission. @boaboyoz noted the car's groovy style, while @MJK9012 remarked on the sunroof's rarity. Enthusiasts like @Iubrooks and @butane appreciate the car's distinctive colors and features, suggesting that it stands out among similar models. Additionally, @mfdigrazia62 predicts a significant increase in value due to the low production numbers of sunroof-equipped models, referencing the strong desirability of such rare configurations.
Neutral: Comments also reflect curiosity and inquiries about the vehicle's specifics, such as maintenance and condition. @dom1015 posed questions regarding potential repairs and documentation, while @jbeinhor sought confirmation on the vin tag and potential repainting issues. The seller, @UncommonMotorCars, responded enthusiastically, providing a wealth of information about the car's service history, condition, and features. Many users seem keen on learning more about the vehicle as it moves through the auction process, indicating a high level of interest from potential bidders.
Negative: On the other hand, there were some concerns raised regarding the sunroof's desirability and market perception. @WishfulThinker23 questioned whether rarity always translates to desirability, and @Noahyjohn expressed hesitation about whether the sunroof might deter buyers. Some comments reflected skepticism about the future value of manuals, as articulated by @OneOfEach, who warned of potential depreciation as demographics shift. There were also inquiries about repair aspects, such as @Vizsla's concern about the fuel pumps not being addressed, showing that not all feedback is solely positive.
|
 |
Positive: @Govertit admires the vehicle by stating it's ready to be enjoyed, wishing the seller good luck with the sale (GLWS!). @dimitriparis remarks on the vehicle's nice condition and appreciates the original aspects, even noting the aesthetic appeal of the pictures taken by Belmont Harbor. Meanwhile, @craZee expresses a personal affection for an E36 M3, showing interest in the potential upgrade to an E46, but also acknowledges the perspectives of knowledgeable individuals that the newer model may not necessarily be an upgrade.
Neutral: @8BitNomad (The Seller) clarifies that the vehicle's original transmission was retained during the engine rebuild but the clutch and pressure plate were replaced. The seller also mentions a suspected slow leak in the air conditioning system, which blows cold air temporarily after recharge. In response to @todmic4272's inquiry about a Carfax entry, the seller explains that the airbag system was checked after removing a passenger side airbag for a window regulator replacement, confirming that everything is fine. The seller also states that though the vehicle can occasionally trigger a check engine light due to a deleted secondary air pump, it doesn't affect performance.
Negative: @Patrick3000 questions the issue with the aftermarket radio's AM/FM function, leading @8BitNomad to reveal that the antenna cable connector broke during installation, requiring a new cable for functionality. @mplowery expresses concern about the engine work and whether it affected power output, to which the seller confirms that the rebuild maintained stock specifications without power changes. They also mention that the new engine components were chosen for reliability, while @Krissuarez92 worries about the occasional check engine light potentially causing issues during California's smog testing.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's beautiful appearance, with @boaboyoz calling it an 'amazing Albuquerque F-100' and expressing appreciation for its vibrant blue color. @BeastRig echoed the sentiment by referring to it as a 'beast of a rig.' Additionally, @Oldarmyguy contributed to the positive feedback by remarking on the truck's aesthetic appeal, highlighting its overall great looks despite some uncertainties about previous modifications.
Neutral: Several comments centered around inquiries and clarifications regarding the vehicle's specifications and modifications. @FyfeAvon1 and others requested details on the block type, while @Oliver2711 and @Ranger429 raised questions about whether the truck was originally a long bed and if it had been shortened. @BMartinez74, the seller, responded to several queries, asserting that the truck is a short bed and confirming the existence of a 1978 grille on a 1974 truck, although expressing some confusion about its history and modifications.
Negative: Concerns were raised about potential issues regarding the vehicle's frame and VIN. @Ranger429 pointed out discrepancies that might affect the title and resale value, suggesting the need for the seller to verify the frame VIN. @Oldarmyguy elaborated on the complications that could arise from the truck having different VINs. Additionally, several commenters noted that the loud fuel pump sound could be bothersome, with @Middler89 specifically mentioning how annoying it was. Commenters also expressed their apprehension about future problems associated with modifications done prior to the seller's ownership.
|
 |
Positive: @Hanesart described the vehicle as a dreamy car that would look lovely under a Christmas tree, reflecting the sentiment that many find it visually appealing. @Dollycat3 complemented it as an absolutely gorgeous 911S, and @THEREALSTIG echoed this with his enthusiasm. @Oliver2711 pointed out the potential for emotional bidding, suggesting that the car invokes strong feelings among enthusiasts. The seller, @CARFINDERDAVID, emphasized its stunning presentation and performance, mentioning how it has won numerous awards and how well it has been preserved throughout the years. Many comments recognized the craftsmanship of the car, with @Flunder908 noting superb panel fit and gaps, further supporting its desirability.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions regarding the car's specifications and modifications. @cmaxcliff provided a detailed critique, noting discrepancies like the wider wheels and missing components that were standard for a 1967 model while still acknowledging its overall quality. @ennisk1 mentioned the car's maintenance history and how many of the observed changes could be reversed if seeking originality. The seller also interacted with users, confirming adjustments made over the years and addressing questions about the vehicle's specifications, reflecting a collaborative dialogue about the car's authenticity and condition.
Negative: There were critical comments about the car's missing original features and modifications that detracted from its authenticity. @ajf and @70SATMan raised concerns about the condition of certain parts and the authenticity of the sports seats, suggesting they are not original to the 1967 model. Others like @cmaxcliff pointed out the standard features that were removed or altered, including the gas heater and fog lights. Despite these issues, the overall sentiment among commenters remained largely positive, with many recognizing the car's beauty and storied past; however, some expressed a cautionary view on its valuation given the modifications.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 2007 Shelby GT500, highlighting its clean condition and low mileage. @BigT77 noted the car's proper transmission, while @DKeng appreciated its unique appearance due to the bronze stripe combination, reminiscent of classic Muscle Cars. @Mattdlevy mentioned a long-standing affection for the model's styling and performance, which adds to the vehicle's appeal. Furthermore, @Wilks described the color combination as sharp and well-kept, emphasizing that it looks super attractive.
Neutral: The seller, @HTSmith, provided detailed information about the car's history, including its original owners and maintenance. They explained that the car had only 342 miles when sold to the second owner, who has since added about 6,000 miles. Comments regarding the optional features included inquiries about the Shaker 1000 subwoofer, which @Elementnomore confirmed as an original feature, and discussions about the stripe color which @linderpat and @PP0001 clarified as not being bronze, but rather a reflection issue.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's original Goodyear Eagle F1 tires, with @PP0001 suggesting replacement due to their age and performance issues in cold conditions. @PP0001 also noted that the new owner should consider changing all fluids to ensure the vehicle's longevity and performance. Additionally, @sjhd sought clarification regarding the paint protection film on the door, prompting concerns about potential irregularities. Overall, while the car was praised, suggestions towards maintenance and performance upgrades were emphasized.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's quality and the seller's expertise in the automotive industry. @vfnrcc emphasizes their 50 years of experience, suggesting that buyers can trust the authenticity and unique features of the cars they present. The thorough test drive process reassures potential owners that the vehicle is in top condition, which adds value to the purchase experience and highlights the seller's commitment to quality and transparency.
Neutral: Comments offer a neutral perspective regarding the selling process and the nature of the vehicle. @vfnrcc mentions the 'No reserve' option for the auction, indicating that they are confident in the market price and the vehicle's desirability. This approach may appeal to certain buyers but may also raise questions about its pricing strategy, leaving room for various interpretations among potential bidders.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism about the vehicle's true condition and the selling practices. While @vfnrcc assures potential buyers of the vehicle's impeccable state, others may worry about the implications of a no-reserve auction, potentially fearing that it might lead to undervaluation. This skepticism could stem from past experiences with similar listings or concerns about the transparency in online car auctions.
|
 |
Positive: @MikeDTaz described the car as beautiful, while @boaboyoz praised the Blue Fire Metallic color and called the build magnifique. @Frankzilla pointed out that B5 Blue has become the official MoPar color, showcasing the appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics. @ssmorley, the seller, added that the car boasts nearly perfect fit and finish, was expertly restored, and offers a chance for potential buyers to see it in person. Additionally, @oneggww complimented the remarkable workmanship and attention to detail in the restoration process, emphasizing the amount of time and resources invested in bringing the car to its current state.
Neutral: @Cryobrad54 noted the unique features like the AM/8 track and buddy seat, providing nostalgic context for older car enthusiasts. @AlternativeFacts reminisced about a memorable animated advertisement for the 1969 Plymouth GTX, enhancing the car's cultural significance. Both @NoCarorMopar and @sellis88 requested pre-restoration photos, highlighting a desire for transparency in the vehicle's condition before the recent renovations. @Valiantjim acknowledged the car's premium options and unique features without offering explicit praise or criticism, focusing on its historical context.
Negative: @Tony63Bee expressed disappointment over the absence of side trim and wheel well moldings, which differentiated the GTX from other models. @F3 mentioned concerns regarding the vehicle's restoration details, such as the lack of blackouts and original parts, suggesting these impacted the aesthetics and authenticity of the build. @KeithRichards and @Funnycarman echoed concerns about missing elements that could lower the value or appeal of the car. @072298jrw commented that adding wheel opening molding could enhance the vehicle's appearance, hinting at a desire for certain characteristics seen in earlier models.
|
|
|