Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
![]() |
Positive: Many commentators expressed admiration for the vehicle, describing it as "totally fab" and "thoroughly exquisite". @boaboyoz called it a "sumptuous specimen", while @Dollycat3 highlighted its "beautiful color" and "gorgeous interior". Other enthusiasts chimed in, with @jimmytheirishman stating it's a "seriously beautiful" example from an era of Mercedes excellence, and @Hoppy18 noting it as "shockingly beautiful". The seller, @thelastdetailchicago, emphasized the car's exceptional drivability and their long experience restoring similar automobiles, garnering further praise from bidders who regarded the vehicle as a stunning piece of automotive art.
Neutral: There were some inquiries regarding specifics about the vehicle's condition and history, particularly relating to its mileage and potential issues. @RiverRat49 questioned the lack of total mileage information in the ad, suggesting it raised concerns about the odometer's integrity, though @Daswagonguy defended the simplicity of the situation. While several comments noted the glorious aesthetic and craftsmanship, questions about original components, like the engine and rear axle setup, were raised by commentators such as @Freidi and @Mark911964. The seller responded to inquiries about the data card, affirming that service records were available, but acknowledged that certain details were still pending more investigation.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming positive feedback, some comments carried a note of skepticism or concern. @Freidi mentioned a missing component on the car, suggesting it had been replaced with something less suitable, which raised questions about its original specifications. Additionally, @ralt12 noticed that the car seemed to sit high in the rear, possibly due to modifications, indicating a potential issue with its presentation. Overall, while many recognized the vehicle's beauty and appealing attributes, a few voiced apprehension that highlights potential drawbacks or uncertainties in its condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous commenters praised the vehicle's extraordinary condition and uniqueness, with @CabiglioGarage stating it's a stunning example of a 1994 Porsche 911 Turbo 3.6 in a rare Slate Gray finish, showing only 2,500 miles. Comments by @AMCNJ and @gotmilk highlighted the car as everything a Porsche should embody, while @BigT77 mentioned its impressive Speedline wheels and Can-Can red piped seats as absolutely beautiful. Enthusiasts expressed envy and admiration, with remarks such as @WowNiceOne's declaration of it being a collector's dream and @Hoppy18 cheering for the auction bids reaching impressive heights.
Neutral: Engagements about the car's mileage and its display-only nature were common among the comments. @Showerfan remarked on the car's 2,500 miles over 31 years as being impractical for enjoyment and investment. However, @Wickswalker and @Franz951 both presented the argument that such a low mileage showcases preservation worth appreciating, sparking a lively discussion around whether to drive or preserve the car. Additionally, @RemingtonSR71 prompted questions regarding the desirability factors for enthusiasts, seeking clarity on the allure of the car amid varying tastes in Porsches.
Negative: On the flip side, some comments expressed skepticism about the investment potential and practicality of owning such a low mileage vehicle. @Showerfan questioned the fun aspect of a car that has seen so little use, suggesting it's a poor investment compared to the stock market. Similarly, @E30eric suggested that the car's history of low mileage might render it underutilized, leading him to emphasize that special cars should definitely be driven. Overall, there were hints of discontent regarding the notion of keeping a masterpiece solely for display rather than the joy of driving.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered significant praise for its unique Amethyst color and standout features. @M3John appreciates the exterior color, while @Mirthmobile expresses love for the interior, highlighting the connection to the classic 964 RS palette. @ShaneS describes the combination of Amethyst and tri-tone pink RS seats as 'killer' and notes the car's overwhelming appeal in different lighting. Commentators like @expletive and @AMALF1 emphasize the beauty of the car and its rarity, reinforcing its status as a collectible among Porsche enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed the car's specifications and history with curiosity. @bocephus was interested in the horsepower rating of the original RS engine, with @ShaneS confirming it falls between 260 to 264 hp. There were inquiries about various aspects of the car, including the replacement engine and its build quality. @copleymotorcars, acting as the seller, responded to questions regarding paint condition and repairs being addressed before the auction ends. Details surrounding the vehicle's auction listing and its journey also captured the attention of many, including @nkochary, who shared insights on its market presence.
Negative: Not all comments were favorable, with some expressing concerns about the car's condition or history. @steven0401 raised issues regarding paint meter readings, hinting at possible repainting, while others noted inconsistencies with the mileage record. @Ruf930 warned that modifications to the car could diminish its historic value, an opinion some found regrettable. Additionally, @dergage and @Profcarnut sought more detailed information about the engine's specifications and service history, suggesting a demand for transparency that may not have been fully met.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the Ferrari 599, highlighting its beautiful design and robust engineering. @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as a 'killer Cali 599 GTB Fiorano' and 'sinister sexiness,' praising it as an exquisite example. @bg191 (The Seller) asserts the car's timeless design and strong performance, noting its high horsepower, and @alfriedesq agrees with another commenter's positive experience regarding gasket issues. Enthusiasts like @vintagepointmiami and @alince cite the rarity and undervaluation of the 599 HGTE, suggesting it is a great investment opportunity that will likely appreciate in value, while @jdavis3350 shares a positive note about the car's sound modification options, praising the seller's expertise.
Neutral: Several comments request additional details about the car's condition and potential issues. @REL007 seeks clarification on the mechanical state, including any signs of oil leaking and whether the car has undergone any paintwork. @MMWX asks about the Tires Pressure Monitoring System (TPMS) functionality and requests pictures that show the dashboard condition. @bg191 (The Seller) generally addresses these inquiries, indicating that the vehicle is in good condition despite limited service history and emphasizing the reliability of this generation of Ferraris. Some users note aspects like leather shrinkage and the state of the interior, leading to varied opinions on the level of required maintenance.
Negative: There are concerns expressed regarding the limited servicing of the vehicle over the past seven years, primarily consisting of oil changes. @Twells10 and @drmbrothers raise issues about the potential need for replacing gaskets and seals due to the car being driven only about 300 miles in three years, suggesting that lack of usage could compromise the vehicle's condition. Questions from @Eastwoos and @IslandGuy address possible age-related issues with the leather and tires, while others worry about rattles and other noises during the test drive. Overall, some potential buyers seem hesitant, given the mix of low mileage and minimal maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Beetagh describes the vehicle as absolutely gorgeous, expressing excitement for watching the auction unfold. @SamHTX (The Seller) shares genuine enthusiasm for owning the 2006 Mercedes-Benz G500 Cabriolet, illustrating the joy of G-Wagon Cabrio ownership. The seller reassures potential buyers with the confirmation of vehicle checks by authorized MB service, revealing no rust and the proper functioning of diff locks, contributing positively to its perceived condition.
Neutral: Comments indicate a variety of observations and questions about the vehicle. @mserpe points out the modification for NHTSA requirements, and mentions potential corrosion in typical areas, prompting requests for detailed photos of the vehicle's condition. @SamHTX (The Seller) actively engages by responding to queries, clarifying misconceptions about rust in specific photos, and providing transparency about the vehicle's status and service checks.
Negative: Concerns about potential rust and previous paint work have been raised by @curated and @Beetagh, with assertions that a visible area may have been painted over and that there could be less desirable aspects not readily apparent. @Gdaddy emphasizes the need for detailed photos to alleviate fears of rust, describing possible issues due to improper securing of the soft top. Overall, while the vehicle has its admirers, the focus on possible corrosion and paint history presents a challenge for some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the 1953 Cisitalia 808XF, labeling it as an exceptional piece of automotive history and a stunning specimen that embodies beautiful design elements. @boaboyoz highlighted it as a rare prototype and a fascinating historical find, while @Dollycat3 and others referred to it as a fantastic gem with unique styling cues reminiscent of other iconic cars. There is a general appreciation for its significant design inspirations, with @PWSchuh and @Habu2 echoing sentiments about its beauty and the talent involved in its creation, noting it should be showcased rather than hidden away.
Neutral: Some commenters engage with the car's backstory and technical details rather than only its aesthetic appeal. @Ranchero65 and @jglowe77 sparked discussions on the car's historical context, including its pricing decisions and development expenses that led to its limited production. Additionally, comments by @ekmcmullen and @easyole (The Seller) offered insights into the connections between Cisitalia and Ford, further contributing to the historical narrative surrounding the vehicle while pondering its legacy and what could have been if it had entered wider production.
Negative: On the other hand, there were remarks that raised doubts about some aspects of the Cisitalia's design, such as the front grille and fitment issues, with @JettJolene pointing out that although the car is stunning, its front-end design falls short. @Sandman4x4 expressed skepticism about the market's capacity to support a vehicle with its flathead Mercury engine, implying that a more powerful engine might have made it more appealing to potential buyers. Furthermore, @raylam88 questioned the craftsmanship regarding trunk fitment, indicating a concern about the build quality, which contrasts sharply with the high praise for its design.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered high praise from multiple commenters, with @Dollycat3 referring to it as a "stunning, elegant, highly desirable" Continental convertible, highlighting its exceptional nature. @Middler89 calls it the "epitome of class" and @PatrickBryant expresses a wish to win the lottery to own such a beautiful vehicle. Other admirers like @lincolnsandcaddies and @1996MBZ appreciate the craftsmanship, with @1996MBZ emphasizing its luxurious nature and signifying the glory days of Lincoln. The comments reflect a strong admiration for the car's design and legacy, showcasing its desirability among classic car enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters have asked for more detailed information and documentation about the vehicle's history, such as @OWLBYRD inquiring about the car's service records and history, and @Rodtorrance requesting videos demonstrating the convertible top and windows. @Mike60 (The Seller) has responded to these requests by stating that he purchased the vehicle with some history but lacks complete documentation, which is common in classic cars. Comments also highlight ongoing communication regarding the condition of the car, as @Mike60 mentioned a recent coolant leak that is being addressed, alongside other maintenance updates.
Negative: There are some concerns raised about the vehicle's condition and authenticity. @johnrotella questioned the accuracy of the vehicle's date code, casting doubt on its classification as a 1965 model. @DrivingDreams criticized the seller's photos for being overly edited, claiming they misrepresent the car's true appearance. Other commenters like @Tiretrend and @Hoppy raised issues about potential additional cracks in the paint and the necessity for video evidence of the car's functionality. These negative comments reflect skepticism around the vehicle's state and the reliability of the information provided, indicating a need for further transparency from the seller.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their enthusiasm for the Mazda RX-7, highlighting its performance and design. @CBar5 noted the appeal of the 5-letter 13B engine, while @Jimmyblues1959 emphasized the added horsepower that made the RX-7 quick. @sidewallsteve praised the unique factory-painted mirrors of the GSL-SE model, calling the color beautiful and suggesting that it could be enjoyed as is or restored. Additional nostalgia was shared by @RoundHeadlights and @PaxtonShelby1, reminiscing about the coolness of these cars in the 80s and their memorable features.
Neutral: The comments reflect a strong nostalgia for the RX-7, with @mmanders (The Seller) sharing personal memories associated with the vehicle, noting its sentimental value. They explained how they had watched their family enjoy the car over the years, highlighting its long history and the importance of its provenance. Other users like @daddsun acknowledged this documentation, which adds to the car's value, and @johnjm discussed the interesting '5-letter car' terminology and shared a blog post related to the RX-7.
Negative: Despite the positive sentiments, some comments hinted at a few concerns. @manfixit asked for compression numbers, indicating a potential worry about the car's mechanical condition. @Carrerachas described their wife's previous RX-7 as only 'interesting,' suggesting it was not a favorite, while other users pointed out issues like the deer incident that led to damage on the driver's side door. Overall, while many appreciate the RX-7's appeal, there are hints of caution regarding its condition and maintenance needs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @SLOPORSCHE commented positively about the vehicle, suggesting that it looks like a well-sorted rig. Additionally, @mr.russky found the truck to be cute, raising curiosity about specific noises in the driving video, indicating a general sense of interest and appreciation for the truck's character. @WAGONBOYTD noted that despite some potential issues, the truck holds cool possibilities for the right price, highlighting its appeal to certain buyers who may see value beyond its rough exterior.
Neutral: Several comments provided neutral observations about the vehicle's condition and specifications. @roberthill pointed out concerns regarding the poor spray paint job in the bed and the missing intake boot, while also questioning the presence of an AC pump without AC functionality. @2hecknback offered insights into the truck's seating capacity and dimensions, suggesting that while it appears somewhat tatty, it could serve as a good working truck with strong suspension capabilities. @lcdck noted the vehicle's similarities to another model previously listed, which raised questions about its identity and history without passing judgment.
Negative: There were several criticisms and concerns flagged about the vehicle's current state. @Mike_Bassett raised multiple questions regarding the engine, asking about potential engine leaks, the lack of air cleaner connection, and the uncertainty surrounding its V8 retrofit. @roberthill and @WAGONBOYTD echoed worries about the AC system's disconnection and the vehicle's overall rough appearance. @FixItAgainTony speculated on the vehicle's origins, hinting that the modifications may have been inadequate, while @2hecknback and @Mike_Bassett both expressed concern about the truck's maintenance issues, which pointed to a lack of care in its upkeep.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's impressive features and specifications. @craZee highlighted its almost 700 horsepower and luxurious amenities like massaging seats, while @Siowner noted the uniqueness of a Cadillac boasting a six-speed manual transmission paired with 700 HP. The aesthetic appeal of the vehicle drew compliments from users like @w28734, who remarked on its beauty and configuration. Additionally, @thefleshrocket pointed out the extensive options available on the car, adding to its desirability. Furthermore, the joy of driving such a powerful and technologically advanced car was emphasized by @TjKC, who shared their personal excitement about the vehicle's performance characteristics.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification and shared their experiences regarding the car's condition and features. @5821driver inquired about the location of the vehicle, and @Trg1956 (The Seller) promptly provided the information. There were also mentions of the car’s maintenance and service history, with @mlawfl11 noting repetitive services over a short period, indicating potential track usage. Commenters like @Ferrarifanclif82 discussed their own experiences with similar models while raising points about potential issues with brake rotors and taillight condensation, thus contributing to a practical dialogue about the vehicle’s performance in everyday use.
Negative: On the downside, a few commenters expressed concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and possible track usage. @thelastride pointed out the frequency of repetitive services in a short time, raising questions about the car's reliability. @GTesq humorously admitted to disliking the car's real-life performance compared to its perceived mechanical perfection, though they acknowledged the seller’s care for the vehicle. @mlawfl11 also echoed concerns about how much time the car may have spent on the track, suggesting potential wear and tear that could affect its long-term viability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz expresses excitement about the vehicle, calling it a 'Bonkers build' and hopes to see footage of it at a strip. @Bocar62 provides details about the impressive specifications, mentioning a 572 Cu In crate engine capable of producing 727 HP, along with the vehicle being street legal in CO and AZ. This enthusiasm is echoed by others, noting the potential for enjoyment as a street rod or cruiser, especially at local shows.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @tlcamg and @SM70, request more information about the vehicle, such as the drive video and horsepower specifications. @Bocar62, the seller, responds by promising a better startup video and confirms that the vehicle has been meticulously built by a well-regarded engineer. Other users, such as @natedodd, point out aspects like the chopped top, indicating they are engaged with the specifics of the build.
Negative: There are concerns raised by users about the vehicle's start-up, with @C10HQ questioning potential mechanical issues that could be causing the harsh start. This is met with some skepticism by @Captainpua, who flagged a comment as non-constructive. Additionally, @AstonGuy disputes the classification of the vehicle, stating it is not a drag truck but rather a 'Pro Street' car, suggesting a disconnect between the seller's portrayal and some community opinions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Lizardbait1 commented on the beauty of the bike, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @Workshirk expressed that this model is the best looking and sounding Ducati ever, even admitting to a hint of disloyalty as an owner of a 998R. @ripper996 reminisced about owning an 888 SP4 that won accolades, praising the design and discussing small personal modifications he might consider for the current bike, indicating that he sees potential value in it.
Neutral: @tim54575 (The Seller) clarified the bike's mechanical state, confirming that it was mechanically sound before being put on display in a private museum for an extended period, but added that the owner ran out of time for troubleshooting its non-running issue. Several commenters, such as @M3123 and @Jebinic, requested more detailed information on the bike's condition and why it isn't running, highlighting a general interest in the specifics of its mechanical issues and repair history. @Ducvet provided insights into the bike's wheels and their specifications while addressing potential concerns about the magnesium wheels' maintenance.
Negative: Concerns about the bike's non-running status were raised by @Capthorod1 and @Manichols, with some commentators questioning whether purchasing a non-running bike is advisable and expressing skepticism about the seller's handling of repairs. @Artonrims and @Zapata questioned the owner's technical competence in troubleshooting, suggesting that although he may know how to change belts, that does not equate to efficiently diagnosing electronic issues. Some commenters lamented the need for the bike to be sold as a project due to lack of time for repairs, which might deter interested buyers.
![]() |
327-Powered 1966 Chevrolet Corvair Monza Sport Coupe Crown Corv-8 Conversion 4-Speed
105376W142229
Lot 222954
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: There are numerous enthusiastic comments praising the vehicle's unique design and performance capabilities. @StrangeIron highlighted it as one of the best stealthy V8 conversions they’ve seen, emphasizing its beauty and potential for fun drives. Many commenters, including @CorvairGA and @Newpatina, shared personal nostalgic experiences with similar cars, expressing a sense of admiration and nostalgia for the mid-engine V8 concept. @PhilVair and @Tiberius1701 also praised the quality of the Crown conversion kit, recognizing it as a top-notch build, and @GlenK noted the excitement of driving such a unique vehicle. Additionally, @Wrench050 reminisced about the durability of Corvair transaxles in racing contexts, complementing the engineering behind these conversions.
Neutral: Several comments discussed technical aspects of the vehicle and general inquiries about its specifications. @Chuckha62 and @MarkGM (The Seller) exchanged knowledge about the vehicle's mid-engine setup, its handling characteristics, and the potential upgrade options for the drivetrain. Others inquired about the engine setup, with @PACK44 wanting more pictures of the engine and installation details, and @Lolamike30 exploring how the vehicle handles with the V8 configuration. @DaveO7701 and @MarkGM discussed the thermal management of the engine compartment, showing a proactive approach to understanding and improving the car's performance. @Cryobrad54 expressed aspirations of building a similar mid-engine project, showcasing a shared interest among enthusiasts.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming positivity, there were a few concerns raised by commenters. @burwellflagin questioned the removal of the rear seat and whether the engine placement affected the interior space, while @Ashtone pointed out potential issues with the vehicle's braking system, prompting a suggestion for upgrades to modern disk brakes. @GlenK highlighted discomfort from noise during long trips in similar builds, indicating possible drawbacks of the mid-engine design when considering daily usability. @RomanMacias64 expressed skepticism regarding the engine's performance at higher RPMs, suggesting concern over the lifespan of components such as valve springs. Overall, while the vehicle attracts considerable admiration, there are elements that potential buyers might want to consider carefully.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters have shared positive experiences with the vehicle, highlighting its reliability, comfort, and enjoyable driving experience. @lkilgore75 noted that this model was their son's first car, which he loved despite it being totaled. @carbrz echoed this sentiment, sharing their experience owning a 2006 model which lasted until 2022 with no issues, emphasizing that it was well-maintained throughout its life. @spoonman42 reminisced about their ownership from 2004 to 2015, calling it a great handling and dead reliable car, while @freestylenet expressed how much they miss their 2007 model, citing its comfort and efficiency as key attributes. Overall, there is a strong affection for this vehicle among past owners.
Neutral: The seller, @aSingh39, engaged with potential bidders by providing information about the vehicle and responding to inquiries. They stated that the car had never been smoked in and uploaded requested videos to showcase its condition. Commenters also expressed casual inquiries, such as @SVTerminator asking about the battery age and @oldtaz requesting specific videos. The seller communicated effectively, ensuring that interested parties had all the information needed to make informed bids, contributing to a positive auction atmosphere.
Negative: A few comments alluded to regret or concerns among commenters. @onlyhonda4me expressed frustration at missing out on the vehicle in a previous auction, conveying a sense of longing for this sought-after model without a manual option. Additionally, @RantWhenParked mentioned missing their own manual transmission version, though they acknowledged the practicality of an automatic for daily commuting. These sentiments hint at a nostalgic connection to the car that some commenters feel, particularly those who cherished a different driving experience.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments from potential buyers, highlighting its stunning appearance with a white exterior and matching interior as a beautiful combination. Commenter @PulseCheck expressed admiration for the car's aesthetics and labeled it an amazing sports car. Additionally, @SullivanAutoHouse reiterated the vehicle's fantastic driving dynamic and versatility, emphasizing that it has been well-maintained and is ready for a new owner.
Neutral: The discussion included inquiries about the car's previous accident, warranty status, and any potential liens. @Mfire and @SofiaLeo asked about the warranty's validity and details of any repairs made due to the accident. @Mfire was reassured by @SullivanAutoHouse, who confirmed that the warranty is valid until June 2026 and also provided information on additional protection plans. Transparency was praised by @AntMD, who appreciated the seller's clarity regarding the car's repairs and history before considering a bid.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's past damage, particularly its significant repair history. Commenters like @AntMD and @bmolsbee questioned the extent and quality of repairs, with @bmolsbee mentioning a substantial repair cost and seeking assurances regarding the work done. Additionally, @AntMD mentioned a suspicion that the car might have been close to being declared a total loss due to the repairs, highlighting the need for thorough verification after such incidents. @Mfire also asked for clarity on the vehicle's accident history, indicating a cautious approach from potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments reflect widespread admiration for the 1930 Ford Model A Town Sedan, highlighting its exquisite restoration quality and aesthetic appeal. @Peterfix67 referred to it as a 'beauty', and @Old_Ned acknowledged the impressive wood-grained interior and overall show-quality restoration. The vehicle's performance was lauded by @Dirtrack49, who noted its comfortable ride and spaciousness, making it an excellent candidate for anyone seeking a well-preserved classic. @Lengrep described the car as a 'remarkably solid' example with a spacious rear seating area, adding to its allure for potential bidders.
Neutral: The seller, @zspec, is actively engaging with potential buyers, providing updates on the vehicle’s features and addressing inquiries about specifics such as the interior fabric availability and the trailer's details. Many commentors, like @Hokiemat and @ModelAkid, raised legitimate questions concerning the materials used in the restoration, such as whether the fenders are steel or fiberglass, and the condition of the door functionality. These inquiries reflect a collective interest in ensuring all necessary details are transparent for an informed purchasing decision.
Negative: Some comments raised minor concerns about the vehicle's condition, such as @ModelAkid pointing out a potential issue with the clevis pin on the brake linkage, suggesting it could lead to brake failure. @Hokiemat also raised a question regarding the visibility of the engine’s serial number, hinting at possible challenges regarding the car’s registration. @Valimotorsports expressed apprehension about New York's regulations on early cars and the implications for registering in California, illustrating uncertainties that could dissuade potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @RoadTherapy expresses appreciation for the Orient Blue color of the vehicle and notes that it appears to be well-maintained despite minor imperfections. @jasonp06069 (The Seller) highlights that the car has been a fun and stylish summer vehicle, emphasizing the limited convertible weather in North West Connecticut as the reason for selling. He expresses eagerness for a lively auction and shares a love for classic BMWs, suggesting a positive outlook on the bidding process.
Neutral: @Lurvey raises a practical question regarding the vehicle's registration status, prompting @jasonp06069 (The Seller) to clarify that in Connecticut, cars over 20 years old do not require new titles and that registration will suffice for the ownership transfer. The seller also confirms that they possess the title from previous transactions, which could be signed if needed. Comments from bidders like @kflv and @Punnzzells indicate genuine interest, and @kflv requests more information about the radio display to ensure the vehicle's features are functioning as expected.
Negative: @kflv points out a concern about the radio display only showing '--AM--', questioning whether it is working properly. @jasonp06069 (The Seller) admits difficulty in setting the clock and acknowledges the vague manual, indicating he hadn't noticed the issue since the radio is typically in use. This exchange raises potential doubts about some vehicle functionalities, which could concern potential bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @HotDoug, as a previous owner of a 1971 Buick Riviera, praises this specific model for being all original, unmolested, and in excellent condition, expressing envy over starting his own journey with such a car. He highlights the beautiful dashboard and the overall amazing condition of the paint and interior. Commentators like @Dollycat3 and @onlyhonda4me also compliment the vehicle's stunning style and fantastic condition, agreeing that it represents the golden age of American automotive design. @OutOfMyElement notes the car's impressive history with a single owner over 70 years, which contributes to its allure and desirability.
Neutral: Several users request additional information about the car, such as trunk photos and confirmation of any original documents like sales invoices or build sheets. @CarProblem asks if these documents exist, and there's discussion around the car's original features, such as whether it has cornering lights or the condition of its mechanics. @Borders1969 raises questions about the auction price and the car's roadworthiness, while @cjp69 assures patience is key as bids often come in towards the auction's end.
Negative: @Borders1969 points out imperfections in the vehicle, mentioning spots in the paint and rips in the interior, suggesting the seller may be expecting too much in terms of price given its apparent need for some repairs. @mmarkmmaster warns that while the car appears beautiful, it may require more than just a new battery to be fully operational. @jafo327 seeks clarification on whether the body and paint are original or have been redone, implying concerns about the car's authenticity and potential need for restoration.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @TDOC9698 describes the vehicle as "an exquisite looking machine," highlighting its impressive aesthetics. Similarly, @MissuDad expresses excitement, favoring the color of the Mini, stating it is his favorite. @Mayjer appreciates the unique Inno 1300 dashboard and compliments the overall design of the MINI, which he has always loved, while noting a few additional features he wishes it had. Overall, there is a consensus among various commenters that the Mini is not only beautiful but also has a lot of appeal in its design and style.
Neutral: @GreenvilleGarage (The Seller) provides helpful responses to prospective buyers, answering questions about the vehicle's condition and shipping logistics. He confirms that the interior floor shots shared by @Automark are representative of the Mini's overall condition and assures that there are no rust issues. The seller also addresses concerns about the speedometer not working previously, indicating that the problem has been fixed and is now functioning properly. Furthermore, he offers assistance with importation processes and shipping logistics to potential buyers, showcasing his willingness to facilitate transactions for interested buyers from various countries.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about specific aspects of the vehicle. @Magneto questions the non-functioning speedometer, indicating potential worries about the car's reliability, while @Kreative wishes the Mini were California legal, hinting at regulatory challenges that could deter local buyers. Additionally, @Lenrod1985 and @19Willys46 express uncertainty about the logistics of exporting the car and retaining Dutch plates, showcasing some complexities involved in purchasing a vehicle from the Netherlands. @minniecooper voices frustration about being unable to bid, pointing to potential technical issues that could impact buyers and their interest in the car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the aesthetic appeal and striking color of the Ferrari 458 Italia, highlighting that it shows beautifully despite its salvage title. Some have noted that the vehicle's overall cosmetic repair work appears more than decent, with several mentions of it being a fantastic driver car for enthusiasts. The seller, @jsandoval87, has shared that the car has been well-maintained with various service receipts from Ferrari Los Angeles and the installation of protective films, tires, and other upkeep items, which has earned the approval of potential buyers looking for a car to enjoy without worrying about mileage or investment value.
Neutral: There is an ongoing discourse about the car's salvage title, with comments that express both caution and interest. Some users point out the importance of receiving more detailed information regarding the accident and repairs, including potential structural issues. Questions regarding the car's history, prior ownership, and the necessity of inspections by qualified Ferrari specialists are prevalent. Commenters like @manhattan_trout and @vv22022022 have raised important concerns about the car's frame integrity and whether repairs were done to industry standards, reflecting a blend of curiosity and concern among potential buyers.
Negative: On the downside, notable apprehensions about the car primarily revolve around its salvage title and potential hidden issues. Several commenters, including @dutchieZ, have warned against bidding without thorough inspection, pointing out potential misalignments in body panels and concerns about the quality of repairs performed. The vehicle's history includes multiple previous owners, which raises further flags about its maintainability and hidden damage. Additionally, questions about the accuracy of the Carfax report concerning airbag deployment and mechanical inspections leave many intrigued yet cautious, with some feeling that the risk may outweigh the reward in purchasing this particular model.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the stunning beauty and elegant design of the 1960 Jaguar Mk IX Saloon. @Wheelyneat described the vehicle as a 'knockout,' while @psg559 appreciated its two-tone paint potential. @boaboyoz commended it as a 'magnificent' example, and @Dollycat3 praised its timeless styling, making it clear that the vehicle has captured the admiration of many enthusiasts. @Racerxke and @tbrady312 both insisted on the high-quality craftsmanship and attention to detail in the restoration, emphasizing features that contribute to its notable driving experience and aesthetics.
Neutral: Some comments brought up technical questions about the vehicle. @XK140 asked for more details about the trunk's toolkit, while @jlk1224 inquired about the age of the tires and the functionality of the clock and radio. Commenters like @KazXK and @MPW6999 were curious about the operation of the dual fuel tank system and seat belts, indicating some areas of interest regarding functionality and historical authenticity that buyers may want to understand better. The seller, @MSCLASSICCARSLLC, engaged with these inquiries, promising to follow up on the needed details and further showcase the vehicle's condition.
Negative: There were a few criticisms and concerns expressed about the car. @V12LUV felt the whitewall tires were out of place and detracted from the vehicle's English aesthetic. @Pennoak expressed surprise that not all restoration details were perfect despite the significant funds reportedly spent. @MPW6999 questioned the condition of the radio and clock after such an expensive restoration, suggesting that some expectations between cosmetic and functional performance might not align. Overall, while the vehicle is overwhelmingly positively received, these comments indicated that not every aspect met every enthusiast's standards.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The responses show a clear enthusiasm among commenters regarding the vehicle's upkeep. @Edstevens (The Seller) provides reassurance about the maintenance performed, highlighting that oil, filters, and brake pads have been freshly changed in his garage using quality materials. This indication of diligence in maintenance is appreciated by potential buyers, suggesting a well-cared-for vehicle. Additionally, the engagement of multiple commenters like @Todd_B and @FasterFranky indicates that there is a community effort to clarify details, which can foster trust in the seller's transparency.
Neutral: Some comments ask for clarification on the vehicle's condition, such as @GeneB85's inquiry about the cause of damage to the rear end. @frankcal raises a question regarding the service records for the third owner since there appear to be no recent updates on CarFax. This demonstrates a moderate level of concern about the vehicle’s history and its current state, reflecting a cautious approach to the purchasing decision. Other participants like @ctlambert are seeking further visual evidence and details about specific images, indicating curiosity but not necessarily expressing negative feedback.
Negative: There are several critiques regarding the vehicle's cosmetic condition, with @ctlambert and others discussing discrepancies in the images, specifically concerning the damage to the rear bumper area. @Edstevens (The Seller) explains that the dent was due to a minor collision with a container, yet some users like @ctlambert seem skeptical about the interpretations of the images. Additionally, user @PopPop62 questions whether there may be an imperfection on the driver's seat based on the pictures, which might raise concerns about the vehicle's interior quality. Overall, there's a sense of scrutiny regarding the vehicle's appearance and the seller's claims, potentially affecting buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @52GMC (The Seller) describes the 1969 MGB roadster as a splendid vehicle that drives fantastically and operates well. He highlights features such as the soft top and the rare hard top that comes with it. Several comments praise the overall condition and appearance of the car, with @rob45 noting that the car looks nice and expressing regret over shipping costs from the Gulf Coast. @52GMC also mentions that the battery is located conveniently and details the good condition of the brake system, wipers, and heater, making it clear that the vehicle has been well maintained and cared for.
Neutral: @DaveK67 contributes by noting his experience with MGBs, questioning the presence of three windshield wipers, which @52GMC clarifies began in August 1969. @Dellorto mentions the overdrive transmission, and @52GMC confirms he hasn't had the chance to determine if it's working due to the snow. The car is currently licensed until August 2026, indicating it has been kept up to date with its maintenance and registration. @billyblyth discusses safety features introduced in this model year, reflecting on the evolution of design.
Negative: Several concerns arise, particularly from @dnrcarrharness and @sstwa, who inquire about potential body damage and paint issues. @dnrcarrharness points out potential problems around the headlights, while @sstwa questions a twisted rubber seal on the hardtop door window. @52GMC systematically addresses these issues, asserting that the paint is beautiful and free of damage, insisting that reflections in photos may lead to misinterpretation. Additionally, @haysenglehart appears confused about the lack of overdrive, which @52GMC confirms, contributing to a sense of caution among potential bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @rpmf08 expressed nostalgia for the 1999 Jeep Wrangler, recalling a great experience with a previous Sahara model and noting it was one of the most fun vehicles he had owned. @Griffin_2020 complimented the seller for providing another excellent Jeep for sale and showed interest in purchasing one. @Henhen11 (The Seller) shared excitement about offering the 1999 Jeep Wrangler Sport with only 92k miles and highlighted its desirable 4.0 6 Cylinder engine and 5 Speed Manual transmission. The seller mentioned the meticulous care it received from both previous owners, describing the vehicle as a 'winner' with great driving and shifting performance.
Neutral: @Resqdawg4us mentioned that her husband loves this model and found some previous maintenance on the CarFax, but noted a lack of documentation for routine services during the second ownership. The seller, @Henhen11, responded positively, stating that maintenance was done regularly, although not all services appear on CarFax. @cas123 requested to see the floor pan for rust assessment and expressed interest in the Jeep, to which @Henhen11 assured that the Jeep is at stock height and promised to provide pictures.
Negative: @DFT shared concerns based on a similar vehicle owned by his son, which had issues with the transmission despite having a lower mileage. He suggested that the older version of the transmission, like the one in this Jeep, is more durable. @RBFP sought clarification regarding a check engine light noted in the driving video, but @Henhen11 clarified that it was just a shift indicator. @motor_masochist inquired about the AC functionality, to which @Henhen11 confirmed it works.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty, unique color, and wheel design. @mef0629 calls it a 'beautiful car' and appreciates the magnificent upgrade to a 5-speed transmission. @groceg remarks on the original color and wheels, seeing potential in the vehicle with some improvements. @ThePhotographersGarage (The Seller) echoes these sentiments, mentioning that the car is a solid driver's vehicle with an interesting history and has been well maintained, making it suitable for events like the Snowball Rally in Northern California.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @architect48 and @groceg, raised questions and noted areas for improvement, such as the condition of the fenders, seats, and interior components. @architect48 inquired about the original parts and condition of the AC system, while @pappentl requested detailed photos of specific areas looking for rust. The seller, @ThePhotographersGarage, responded positively to these inquiries, providing additional information on the car's history and repair records, suggesting a collaborative dialogue around the vehicle's condition and history.
Negative: Criticism surfaced regarding certain aspects of the car's condition. @groceg pointed out that the vehicle appears greasy underneath and requires various restorations, such as new seat work and updated door cards. @architect48 noted a crack in the area where the fenders meet the front sheet metal, suggesting a past repair that may not have been done properly. There was also humor in comments about the vehicle's California smog status, such as @architect48's quip regarding 'gross polluter' designations being akin to a 'Scarlet letter,' highlighting concerns about its emissions compliance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received many favorable comments from various enthusiasts who admire its condition and unique features. @Fargin praises the car's appealing tangerine color, while @PanteraMike74 appreciates the car's clean appearance and notes how well the color comes across in videos. @Garyhoward and @Artin also express strong admiration for the car, with Artin recalling a positive encounter at a local car event. Multiple commenters highlight the car's originality and quality, with @SJBOTT calling it a solid example, further enhancing its overall reputation among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments inquire about specific details concerning the vehicle's condition and modifications. @WaldoOC questions the nature of the duplicate title and consistency regarding the targa top's features, and @bobrk seeks expert opinions on the carburetor upgrades. @Volksouj (The Seller) clarifies inquiries about the vehicle's specs, including the two available tops and maintenance history. This exchange contributes to a neutral tone, focusing on gathering valuable information rather than outright praise or criticism.
Negative: A few comments reflect skepticism or raise concerns about the vehicle's modifications. @jzglinicki points out potential drawbacks to switching from fuel injection to carburetors, suggesting that performance issues could arise without a cam change, though he still appreciates the car's overall aesthetics. This caution highlights possible reservations future buyers might have about modifications leading to performance variability. Overall, while the negative sentiment is not dominant, it does prompt potential buyers to consider the implications of such changes carefully.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bobrux (The Seller) mentions that the car runs and drives great, indicating that all mechanical components are in good shape. Additionally, he highlights that the tires are like new, specifying the date codes for both front and rear tires, which suggests they are recent and in excellent condition.
Neutral: @Bobrux (The Seller) encourages potential buyers to reach out directly using the Contact Seller button for any inquiries. He also reminds bidders and watchers that there is a little over 24 hours left for the auction, inviting questions from the audience to ensure clarity before the bidding ends.
Negative: @birdie1 questions the vehicle's overall condition, specifically asking about the motor and transmission issues, the state of the clutch, and the age and condition of the tires. While there are no negative comments from @Bobrux (The Seller), @birdie1's inquiry implies a concern that could reflect potential buyers' hesitance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @threevalves comments that the vehicle looks like a really nice example, while @rpmf08 notes that these vehicles provide some of the most smiles per hour due to their excellent design and driving experience. @miatasportscar and @jwales also express enthusiasm for the car, with @jwales mentioning a high fun factor from their own experience with a similar model. There are multiple positive remarks about the car's appearance, with @dbsmelser highlighting the beauty of the Velocity Red Mica paint in person, which may not translate well in photos. Overall, commenters appreciate the car's aesthetics and the joy of ownership it brings.
Neutral: The Seller, @redcellmk25, interacts positively and provides additional information when asked about the car's condition, addressing inquiries about timing belt replacement and undercarriage photos. They confirm that the vehicle is entirely stock and share details about the ownership history, stating that the car has been well maintained and has no major issues. @Stlblues13, who inspected the car, agrees that it is clean and matches the description but notes that it will require new tires and a timing belt soon. The comments provide a balanced view of the car's condition and indicate areas for potential maintenance.
Negative: Comments are generally positive or neutral, with minimal negative feedback. However, @miatasportscar raises a concern regarding the timing belt and water pump service, suggesting that it should be replaced soon to avoid issues, which @redcellmk25 confirms hasn't been done yet. @bruceme asks about the number of keys, indicating a concern for completeness, which reveals a basic aspect of the car's selling points but doesn't detract significantly from overall impressions. There are minor remarks regarding small issues like a dent in the door, mentioned by @Stlblues13, but these are not seen as major deal-breakers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed appreciation for the 1986 Convertible, highlighting its value and the driving joy it offers. @kinglaw mentioned it as a great opportunity for a lot of car and noted that the clutch issue seems to be within normal wear and tear. Additionally, @bmclean122 shared a positive experience with their own well-preserved Pacer, emphasizing how enjoyable these C4s are to drive and considering them a great bargain for a drop-top Corvette. @braktrcr praised the C4 design, implying that despite the criticism it sometimes receives, it remains an appealing option compared to other vehicles.
Neutral: Several comments touched on the vehicle's specifications and history without strong positive or negative sentiments. @Kinglaw pointed out that the car lacked the Z52 option, which some buyers might find relevant but stated that this is not a negative, as upgrades can be made. @CadillacFlashback raised the possibility that this vehicle may have been used as a festival car at the Indy 500, adding an interesting historical connection while pointing out the difficulty in verifying this claim. @JACKRBT confirmed some details about the car's interior and options, providing clarification on the availability of the Z52 and color specifics, making it clear that while these details are important, they are more informative rather than evaluative in tone.
Negative: On the flip side, some commenters expressed concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @kinglaw noted a question about why the clutch had to be replaced at only 20,000 miles, hinting at potential underlying issues. @CadillacFlashback also urged caution about the engine video, suggesting possibly a lack of complete transparency. While some users did mention the general depreciation of the C4 model, @094spd brought attention to the fact that all 1986 Corvette convertibles had decals and badges consistent with the Indy 500, hinting at a sense of confusion regarding the uniqueness or value of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @austin_alfa expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, recalling childhood dreams associated with iconic car features like Offenhauser fins, Edmunds intakes, and twin carburetors. They find the car enjoyable to own and note its bright 'Santa Claus Red' color. @oldwrench54 comments on the fun factor of driving it, suggesting it's perfect for picking up a date. @PWSchuh describes the vehicle as both homely and attractive, admiring the distinctive grille design. @Knuckles-R-Busted finds it visually appealing and attributes some of its style to a French design influence. Additionally, @rofandofy calls it rare and awesome, highlighting its unique position in the automotive world. @MarkS appreciates the spirit of the brand, noting its homemade approach to cars and its success in both racing and rallying, showcasing the car as a true piece of automotive history.
Neutral: The comments reflect a mix of admiration and curiosity about the vehicle's background and characteristics. @larrib engages with @allardregister regarding the manufacturer's history, seeking clarification on whether the company built prewar or postwar cars, while @vty777 recalls personal car experiences from the 1950s. @mandeman1949 highlights unique features like the Rube Goldberg column shifter and control labels, indicating a blend of functionality and creativity. @Electraglider urges others to watch a video demonstrating the vehicle's V8 engine, emphasizing its auditory appeal.
Negative: There are limited negative comments regarding the vehicle, with @Ayrton-B making a remark that the car is 'not pretty' but 'very interesting.' @Petrolholic suggests a desire for improvements, specifically indicating that the current materials used inside should be replaced with proper leather, implying that the interior might not meet modern expectations for quality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @98WS6 remarked on the rarity of the car, emphasizing that though he is not a convertible fan, this specific model stands out due to its unique options. @RaiderSmiley expressed excitement about the radio, noting its origins may stem from a 4th generation model, showcasing an appreciation for retro car audio features. The comments from @mmbarnabas (The Seller) indicate pride in the car's features, particularly the well-functioning AC and heating, as well as the mentions from enthusiasts like @history350 and @EvorICE highlighting the impressive specifications such as the rare 5-speed and factory custom convertible design. Overall, the car has garnered admiration from several commenters for its specifications and nostalgic appeal.
Neutral: @Arizonaoven posed practical questions regarding the functionality of the AC and the presence of any leaks, as potential buyers often seek detailed operational insights for assurance before purchasing. The inquiries from @Sakkak about the soft top latch and @chrisZ28 regarding the stereo antenna mentioned the need for additional information to assess the vehicle's condition thoroughly. The seller, @mmbarnabas, responded to questions by clarifying the antenna's operation and admitting to some shortcomings in photography skills, demonstrating a willingness to engage with interested parties and provide transparency about the car's features and potential issues.
Negative: Despite the positive discussions, commenters like @NCRSmaniac and @Fourunner6 expressed surprise that a uniquely optioned convertible 5-speed IROC would not command a higher price, reflecting a general consensus that the value does not match the perceived quality and rarity of the car. @Jimshane highlighted that many buyers may overlook the significance of the LB9 engine, implying a market misunderstanding about the true value and performance capabilities of the model. Further, the condition of some parts like the convertible top release lever raised concerns, as @ms3DALE shared with @chrisZ28, suggesting that potential buyers might be wary about the presence of necessary repair items and overall vehicle maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @4x4Lover expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, calling it "Baja Ready," which suggests that he views it as capable and suitable for off-road adventures. This positive endorsement highlights the vehicle's readiness for performance in challenging terrains.
Neutral: @camaussie inquired about the changes in the auction format, specifically noting the absence of a reserve this time. @Jilllaurene815, the seller, confirmed that the only change is the switch to a no-reserve auction. @jacobgribble asked about the availability of soft or hard tops and doors for the vehicle, indicating a neutral interest in additional features.
Negative: @johnnycab criticized the use of the term "exhaust finisher," suggesting that it is an unusual term that could confuse buyers. He commented that he had always referred to it as 'exhaust tips' and implied that the language used by @BaT should be more mature or professional, pointing out an area of potential confusion for buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Hianano commented positively about the vehicle's aesthetic, mentioning it as a beautiful car. @EliBoMarley praised the car for being amazing, highlighting its speed, advanced technology, and comfort. @Cedesguy shared an informative insight on shipping costs, showcasing a knowledgeable and optimistic perspective on the logistics involved in transporting the car.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Ozzyman57 and @Rdfrancischelli, raised inquiries about the shipping costs and logistics to transport the vehicle from Hawaii to the mainland, indicating a shared curiosity about this aspect. @cpicorp1 asked for recommendations for shipping companies, demonstrating a pragmatic approach to the shipping process. @G-Dub and @Fireball739 provided additional shipping cost estimates, showing that there is active engagement from potential buyers about logistics.
Negative: @Autogeek113 raised concerns about the frequent tire replacements on the low-mileage car, questioning whether this issue is due to driving habits or potential mechanical problems. This indicates skepticism towards the vehicle's maintenance and overall condition, pointing out a possible red flag for prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @MEZGER917 (The Seller) introduced the gorgeous 2009 911 GT2, highlighting its rarity with only around 20 cars produced for that model year. Enthusiasts praised its stunning design, referencing its beautiful Carrara White color and clean lines. Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's features, with @SteveTheodore noting that the addition of PCM 3.0 for the 2009 model is significant, making it even cooler in the North American market. @BigT77 celebrated the car's low mileage, suggesting it feels like a new example, and @Hoppy18 described it as a 'snowstorm' of beauty, generating excitement for its auction.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @SPC23 and @Airliner1, expressed appreciation for the vehicle, noting that its driving video was impressive and sparking conversation about the car's performance. Questions arose concerning the vehicle's title and mileage, with @SS4435 inquiring about the DME report and other specifics regarding the vehicle's keys and tire dates. Meanwhile, @mara721 pointed out the modern upgrade options available for the car, contributing to discussions about the potential value and appeal of the 2009 model. Other comments celebrated the rarity of the car's original specifications, with mentions of its appeal to collectors.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the car's features, such as @mar721 suggesting that the PCM+ upgrade might diminish the factor that influences buyers to select a 2009 over an 2008 model. @jwmiller238 expressed disbelief at how a car like this could be optioned with anything other than certain desirable features, stating that original specifications significantly impact value. @becauseracecar1 asked for further details about the engine's condition, indicating that some potential buyers might be cautious about understanding the vehicle's performance history. Overall, some commenters voiced skepticism about the bidding dynamics, as @Seaate20 mentioned the subjective nature of bidding without much rhyme or reason, highlighting the competitive atmosphere surrounding the auction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is highly praised for its originality and superb maintenance. @Dollycat3 describes it as an 'absolutely beautiful' SL with a 'gorgeous green interior' and extensive documentation. @SWET echoes this sentiment, noting the vehicle's beautiful presentation and well-documented history. @Capitanron admires the car's originality, calling it a rare 'survivor' that someone will be lucky to purchase. Additionally, @whipcity76 appreciates the car's storied history, emphasizing its well-preserved condition and the warmth of the family connection behind it. The seller, @martymorin8912, provides a touching background of the car, enhancing its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments seek clarification on specific aspects of the vehicle while also showing interest in its features. @bader86 inquires about matching numbers and photographs, while @RobLeslie asks about the functionality of the heating and cooling levers. @AlRocky raises a question regarding the tail lights and their authenticity, demonstrating a keen interest in ensuring the car's integrity. @vladoh expresses curiosity about a recent compression test, indicating a desire to know more about the car's condition. These inquiries reflect a balanced interest in the car's details without diminishing its overall appeal.
Negative: A few comments express concerns regarding specific aspects of the vehicle, although they remain constructive. @Scuderia1 and @bader86 ask about the presence of welds and notches, showing a meticulous interest in details often scrutinized by enthusiasts. While @Tim_Everett shares a personal account of modifying his own vehicle, he touches on the emotional challenge of parting with a longtime possession, hinting at an underlying anxiety regarding the sale. Such comments indicate that while the vehicle is generally well-regarded, some potential buyers have specific reservations that they want addressed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Myoldcut emphasized the appeal of the vehicle, encouraging potential buyers to purchase it and enjoy driving while fixing it up. @KentuckyEd noted the festive colors of red and green, suggesting it could be a fun project if the price is right. @Gonavy78 expressed admiration for the Spitfire's design, calling it the best-looking British car and reminiscing about his experiences owning multiple Spitfires, despite their challenges.
Neutral: Comments from @Chuchip and @ibex74 shared experiences about driving similar models, highlighting the mixed feelings of joy and trepidation when navigating busy roads or freeways in such compact cars. @TexasGT6 and @Hoosbeach inquired about the car's functionality and whether it starts and drives, indicating a desire for more information before committing to a purchase. @SDCR reminisced about previous ownership of a Spitfire and acknowledged the allure of small sports cars despite the risks involved.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @sesom regarding the vehicle's condition, citing serious rust and a mediocre paint job, which could hint at further hidden issues. @SteelyTim pointed out that wheels don't just fall off for no reason, implying maintenance concerns. Additionally, @sliproc and @Citabria98 highlighted the challenges of driving this type of car, expressing skepticism about its reliability and road safety compared to more modern vehicles.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @VWTony expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, calling it a "Perfect 73 Standard Beetle!!" He complimented the clean appearance and low mileage, noting the attractive grey interior. Further, he mentioned that the car's condition would likely attract good auction bids. @mick59 echoed similar sentiments, stating it is a good choice for daily driving, while @rustyrotors reminisced about a personal connection to the car, praising its color and acknowledging the fun of driving such vehicles without air conditioning. @compras shared admiration for the stylish Marathon rims, noting it would not be overly difficult to install a modern air conditioning unit.
Neutral: @davidb72 raised a question about Picture 44, prompting responses from others regarding the image, which @Rtachs clarified was a nose bra. There were discussions about the air conditioning system, with @Armchair discussing the installation history of A/C in air-cooled VWs and emphasizing that it was never factory-installed. @compras and others inquired about the heating functionality, and @kbirds specifically asked if the heat worked, which led to a collaborative conversation about what the seller could confirm regarding the vehicle's heating and air conditioning setup. @Fargin and @Blissboat shared memories of their own VW experiences, tying back the A/C narrative into the vehicle's historical context.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, some comments were skeptical regarding the air conditioning. @Hubie7 pointed out that no factory air conditioning was available in Beetles at the time, questioning @VWTony's thoughts about A/C installations in Canada. Additionally, @rustyrotors warned that the engine's performance could suffer with an air conditioning setup, suggesting that drivers might prefer open windows instead. @sgibrad and @compras also contributed to the clarification that A/C was a dealer-installed option, not factory-designed, which led to discussions about the practicality of the A/C setup mentioned by @Rtachs. Concerns surrounding the functionality of air conditioning were noted as potential drawbacks, despite overall admiration for the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @wem mentioned that this vehicle could be a great opportunity for a DIY enthusiast, and @enthusiastic_enthusiast highlighted that it is a fantastic driver and a solid entry point for anyone looking to own a 911. @Packard374 noted that the vehicle is a strong candidate for a no reserve auction, underscoring its potential. The seller also expressed excitement about the listing, stating that they are a trusted seller with a strong track record on BAT, and look forward to the future of this car.
Neutral: Several commentators shared questions and observations about the vehicle's condition and possible repairs needed. @SoulMan referred to the car's decent foundation for a running restoration, mentioning potential costs for various repairs that may improve its appeal. @luvoldcars and @SoGi engaged with the seller, asking for clarification on features like power seats and the results of a bore scope inspection, indicating they are interested yet cautious and seeking more information before making a bid.
Negative: There were concerns from users like @Scott_S, who suggested that the vehicle might be more suitable as a parts car given its condition at the current price point. @benn raised questions about the DME report and why the hood doesn't open, implying a lack of transparency regarding the car's history. @SoulMan noted that while the vehicle could be a steal if bidding remains low, the extent of non-functional amenities raises red flags about the car's viability for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their excitement about the vehicle's vibrant colors and overall good condition. @Noisyboyz praised the car's original state, while @johnnyvett noted it as a nice, unmodified driver with excellent documentation. @19seventy3vette highlighted the fact that the car is a one-owner vehicle, which adds to its historical value. @RussR echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing the rarity of such well-preserved cars, while @Coronette commended the owner's care for keeping the car mainly original without common modifications. This shared enthusiasm suggests a high appreciation of the vehicle's unique attributes among the community.
Neutral: Neutral remarks from commenters focused primarily on the vehicle's physical condition and underlying issues. Some noted the surface rust and potential concerns regarding the car's undercarriage and 'birdcage', such as @Frankzilla and @68CamaroSS396L78, who discussed visible corrosion but also acknowledged the car's age. @CCWC (The Seller) addressed the painting and touch-ups over the years, asserting that the vehicle remains structurally sound despite cosmetic concerns. Others, like @Kkoester, commented on specific areas needing attention while maintaining an overall positive outlook on the car's original components.
Negative: Conversely, some commenters voiced concerns that could detract from the vehicle's appeal. @Frankzilla and @68CamaroSS396L78 pointed out rust issues that suggest the car may have been stored outdoors, which is common for vehicles from areas with harsh winters. @22truckie provided extensive commentary on paint overspray, explaining that it raised questions about potential over-repairs or lack of originality. Some, like @Jimbob123, shared their worries about specific mechanical components which could impact the vehicle's performance. These criticisms show a more cautious perspective regarding the car's long-term viability and authenticity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Shawh praises the vehicle as an amazing example of Americana and an early automotive hot rod, complementing the consigner for such a fantastic car. @edand highlights its impressive pedigree, marveling at the nearly 100 years of racing history, stating that vehicles like this are no longer made. @Frankzilla expresses his enthusiasm with a 'Good Luck With The Auction!' and @mogles1242 describes the car as one of the coolest they have seen recently.
Neutral: @Ronson68L78 admits to a strong desire for the car to surprise his Corvette friends, even though he anticipates bidding beyond his budget. @Rseay inquires about the suitability of the car for someone of their size, receiving confirmation from @ja12514 (The Seller) about the snug fit but enjoyable driving experience. @Bentley3 shares extensive personal racing history with the vehicle, detailing improvements made to enhance performance over the years, solidifying its storied past.
Negative: @mike_747 shares his experience of expensive shipping costs for vehicles, hinting at potential financial burdens that may come with purchasing the car. @brakeservo expresses concern about the expectations placed on the seller regarding shipping knowledge. @OutOfMyElement steps in with comments on shipping arrangements, suggesting alternative methods of transportation, highlighting the logistical challenges involved in acquiring the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning color and quality of restoration. @Dollycat3 referred to the car as a "lovely Springtime Yellow beauty," while @rfrankov noted its impressive restoration and appealing features such as power brakes, steering, automatic transmission, and air conditioning. The seller, @lloyddon1, emphasized the car's originality and its immaculate condition, asserting that it is an "honest, straightforward, no excuses car," suggesting a high level of trust in the vehicle's quality. Overall, the responses reflect excitement and positive interest in the car's attributes.
Neutral: Several comments addressed the color of the vehicle. @59turner and others noted discrepancies in color representation in the photos, with some describing it as brighter or more lemony than the advertised 'Springtime Yellow.' @foqus suggested that these variations may be due to lighting conditions that affect how the color appears in different images. Commenters raised inquiries about specific features of the car, with @lovecars asking for details on the engine and @ChasinFords requesting further photos of the trunk area. @Mx7 pointed out that the interior appeared unfinished without a center console, alluding to common modifications that potential buyers might consider.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiments, there were critiques regarding bidding behavior and some confusion in the thread. @wannabid55 and @24CWR24 expressed frustration with low bids that seemed meaningless, questioning the purpose of such bidding practices on auctions. Additional concerns were raised by @DragonPLP, who asked about potential issues like leaks or rust on the car, indicating that parts of the community were cautious despite the seller's strong endorsements. Moreover, @Kvox humorously noted the oddity in discussions, suggesting that people have focused heavily on the color while also advocating for the car's impressive specifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the impressive history and condition of the vehicle, emphasizing that it has been well-cared for by the owner who maintained it since it was purchased in 2002. @campari, the seller, illustrates the vehicle's low mileage and clean Carfax, which many enthusiasts appreciate. Commenters such as @supercustomdeluxe and @onlyhonda4me celebrate the car's aesthetic appeal and reliability, with the latter noting the excellent color combination of Silverstone Metallic and scarlet red leather. Overall, the car is regarded as a 'gem' in the S2000 community, with several comments affirming it as a sound investment for enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters express interest in the S2000's unique characteristics and driving history. @LaoFu acknowledges the car's maintenance records and the original owner’s attachment, while also pointing out that the vehicle has only seen 10k miles in the last decade. @Alaska1 shares a personal experience of driving an S2000 on track, adding to the community's appreciation for the model's performance. The responses reflect a shared enthusiasm for the car's heritage as a classic Honda and the joy that comes with owning such a vehicle, providing a neutral perspective on its history and maintenance.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the car's old tires, as noted by @LaoFu, who suggests that the new owner will need to address this issue promptly. Additionally, some commenters have experienced minor technical issues; @LaoFu requested a video of the dash lights functioning while watching a provided acceleration video, showing a bit of wariness about the car's overall condition. While these remarks don't detract from the overall positive sentiments of the vehicle, they do reflect a cautious approach to potential buyers considering the S2000.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflected positive sentiments about the RV’s comfort and features. @johnny-beau (The Seller) emphasized that the unit is like new, with only a couple thousand miles and no signs of wear, having been stored indoors and regularly maintained. Many commenters appreciated the spacious seating arrangement with four captain chairs and the convertible couch that accommodates up to seven seatbelts, indicating a family-friendly design. Additionally, @Paul6200 shared a positive experience with the same engine type, highlighting its efficiency and performance, reassured potential buyers about the engine’s reliability.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed curiosity about the RV's specifications and features. Questions regarding the weight, seating arrangements, and functionality, such as the presence of a generator and the storage capacity, were raised by @Sk1023, @tech2580, and @titan1234, among others. @johnny-beau (The Seller) provided detailed answers, confirming that the RV utilizes a solar panel and alternator for power and addressing concerns about engine power and vehicle handling. This interaction demonstrates a willingness to engage and clarify doubts, fostering a collaborative discussion between the seller and potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments indicated skepticism about the RV's engine power, particularly regarding the smaller 2.0L 4-cylinder engine. @Coolguys expressed doubts based on past experiences with a similar engine, while @Skinnyphat and others raised concerns regarding the vehicle's performance with a heavier load. Additionally, @EAO495 questioned the reason for the RV's quick sale after initial purchase, hinting at concern about the vehicle's desirability or performance. Overall, while many appreciated the RV's features, certain comments reflected hesitation about the engine and power capabilities.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the enthusiasm surrounding the 2017 Porsche Cayenne S being auctioned by @GulfStreamMotorCars. Many users appreciate the car's overall condition, noting it seems to be one of the finest examples from its generation. @TALDRETE expressed satisfaction with new passenger seat photos, while @Cappy1988 commended the seller for their detailed responses regarding service history and maintenance records. There was also excitement about the vehicle's options, including Apple CarPlay, which @CarGuyTexas911 inquired about. From the seller's assurances, the vehicle has been well cared for, has new Michelin All Seasons tires, and all service is reportedly up to date, creating positive anticipation among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several questions and discussions occurred regarding the vehicle's specific details and condition. @Etmiller101 asked about the historical maintenance records, to which @GulfStreamMotorCars clarified that records are available on the Carfax report. @campodf inquired about the number of keys and the dashboard leather condition, to which @GulfStreamMotorCars confirmed there is one key and that the leather is in excellent condition without sagging. Additionally, @dddohio pointed out some dashboard alerts in a picture, eliciting explanations from the seller confirming they were low fuel and trunk issues rather than maintenance concerns.
Negative: There were a few concerns raised by potential buyers. @Cappy1988 noted that the Carfax report showed zero oil changes, leading to questions about the vehicle's maintenance. However, @GulfStreamMotorCars defended the vehicle's history, explaining that some maintenance may not be reported. @campodf expressed specific worries about the dashboard leather possibly losing its adhesive and wanting clarity on whether the vehicle’s condition was acceptable. @dddohio also raised questions about shipping rates and warranty plans, suggesting that buyers are looking for comprehensive information before making a decision, indicating some apprehensions about the purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is described as a Gorgeous Iridium Silver Metallic over Black with Burl Walnut Wood Trim 2010 Mercedes Benz X164 GL450 4Matic AWD. The auction listing highlights its extensive features such as the Premium 01 Package, Lighting Package, and a Multi Source Dual Screen Rear Seat Entertainment System. Buyers can also find additional items included in the sale, such as factory literature, spare parts, and a remote for the entertainment system, which creates a positive impression of completeness and quality.
Neutral: Commenters discussed various aspects of the vehicle, including inquiries about the rear seat entertainment screens. @EKnowles pointed out the condition of the screens in specific pictures, while @TargaJohanSF looked into replacement costs for the screens, noting that they are genuine OEM parts available from Mercedes-Benz. @Tonehound mentioned that addressing the screen issue could be straightforward if the remote control was available, to which @aegmotorsports confirmed its inclusion.
Negative: On the downside, there are concerns regarding the condition of the rear entertainment screens, which @EKnowles described as looking scratched and damaged in photos. @McPlumber raised questions about other aspects like the presence of keys and detailing products visible in photographs that could detract from the car's overall presentation. Additionally, @kevinG2 questioned potential damage to a center digital display, indicating further issues that may need addressing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Mordizzle appreciates seeing the vehicle being enjoyed, indicating that it has been used in a way that brings joy. @TPH56 mentions that the No Reserve listing should stimulate bids, suggesting enthusiasm for the auction format and excitement about the vehicle's potential value as a driver.
Neutral: @Idriveold2022 is inquiring about any reported accidents, reflecting a standard concern from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's history. @PVZ13 is asking for confirmation of California smog compliance, indicating a desire for assurance regarding environmental regulations. @MarkSS is curious about the application of stripes, showing interest in the vehicle's aesthetics and details.
Negative: @26blackthorn critiques the seller for not repairing the window switch despite being a dealer, questioning the professionalism. This criticism highlights a potential red flag regarding the vehicle's maintenance. @carchoice303 (The Seller) responds to inquiries but does indicate limitations in the vehicle's history with regards to accidents, which may not entirely satisfy potential buyers looking for transparency.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Gary_T1 highlights the Jeep Maverick Special's historical significance in blending comfort and style into utilitarian vehicles, calling it a pioneer even before the IH Scout Aristocrat. @Dollycat3 expresses enthusiasm over the rarity of the Willys Jeep Maverick Special, labeling it as a fabulous piece of automotive history. @mywillys admires the impressive build quality, and @scramboleer describes it as a time capsule with a well-redone interior, emphasizing the rarity of the emblems on the vehicle.
Neutral: @CraigInPA provides a balanced view on the comfort of Willys wagons, mentioning that while they do have some challenges like a rough ride, they excel in practical scenarios such as rescue operations. @Valkyrja reminisces about childhood memories with a similar model used for outdoor activities, while @T_McCool appreciates the aesthetics of the Willys Wagon. Several commenters participate in discussions about the windshield differences, providing clarifications without strong opinions on their impact on the vehicle.
Negative: @rocki327 raises concerns regarding the lack of seller engagement in the discussion and the absence of a driving video, which adds doubt regarding the vehicle's condition. @rocki327 further worries about transparency in the sale process, feeling deterred from making a serious bid. @JVM223JEEP explains the two-wheel drive nature and limited speed capabilities of the Maverick, indicating that despite its rarity, potential buyers should be cautious due to unanswered questions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @wpratt (The Seller) mentions that the vehicle is mechanically sound and has just undergone a full service with all fluids changed, indicating it requires no immediate work. Additionally, @wpratt (The Seller) reassures that an inspection sticker was acquired recently, suggesting that all essential items, including lights and wipers, are functioning properly. The seller is responsive to inquiries, having provided videos to prospective buyers, showcasing the working elements of the vehicle.
Neutral: Some commenters have inquired about specifics regarding the vehicle's roof options, such as the availability of a hard top or soft top, and the absence of doors. @Shawnkohan requested videos to verify that all lights and wipers are operational and expressed curiosity about whether the vehicle is ready for enjoyment or requires further investment for maintenance. @AidenN sought information about the difficulty of sourcing doors and hard tops, suggesting a common concern among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's features.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @AKLandyNut about the lack of essential components such as a soft top, hard top, air conditioning, and heating system, which could limit usability. Furthermore, @mudpaws72 pointed out several design aspects, indicating that the truck has a pre-1973 setup lacking safety features like a roll bar. @Shawnkohan also questioned the normalcy of the engine's shaking in the video, indicating potential worries about engine health, to which @wpratt (The Seller) acknowledged that the shaking is typical when cold but will settle when warmed up.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @wmorang praised the vehicle as a "classic and a badass 930" and complimented its color combination, expressing interest in the listing. @thhaar noted the car's vintage charm, mentioning some minor imperfections that are expected, but emphasized the credibility provided by its service history at @Musante Motorsports, a reputable facility in the Northeast. @SFKramer (The Seller) showcased a range of upgrades to the vehicle, including a new boost gauge, strong AC system improvement, and several other performance enhancements installed at @Musante Motorsports, reinforcing the car's strong maintenance background.
Neutral: Multiple commenters, such as @mnashed and @dwr251, asked about specific vehicle details, including wheel specifications and rust on the underbody, indicating an interest in the car's condition. @ChuckDMGB inquired about the unique tachometer setup, while @Jcann52 requested information on leak-down numbers, showing a diverse array of questions aimed at understanding the car's performance and history. @911rules asked about a reflector light present on the vehicle, illustrating the various elements of the car that potential buyers find intriguing.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some users regarding the condition of the car, particularly @dwr251 who sought clarity on underbody rust and repairs, which is a critical consideration for older vehicles. The lack of immediate answers to some technical inquiries suggested areas where potential buyers may feel unsure. Additionally, the need for details on leak-down numbers and potential issues with the speedometer from @ChuckDMGB indicated that there may be certain customization decisions that inspire some skepticism among enthusiasts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the exceptional quality and desirability of the 2015 Mercedes G550, with many praising its rare Thulite Red color and low mileage. @littlehandegan (The Seller) emphasizes that this is a fully serviced vehicle, ready to be enjoyed; it features modern amenities like heated and cooled seats, Bluetooth, and a backup camera, making it a luxurious yet practical choice for daily driving or outdoor adventures. Other commenters like @TheDirtyThirty and @mccormick009 also express admiration for the truck's condition, with @EMW inquiring about its history, indicating interest in its background and care.
Neutral: Some comments reflect on the aesthetics of the G550, with @ironmikey12 admitting that while the color is not to their taste, they recognize the truck's beauty. This sentiment is echoed by @ldesautel and @maramski, who acknowledge the vehicle's distinctive color and final iteration of the engine. The discussion around the suitability of the G550 for various uses, from being a daily driver to serving as a luxury off-road vehicle, captures the diverse interests of potential buyers.
Negative: There are mixed reviews regarding the appearance of the brush guards, with @mserpe noting their ineffectiveness and suggesting they can cause more damage than protection. This highlights a concern some have with vehicle modifications. Additionally, while the overall sentiment is positive, there is caution regarding the past minor damage mentioned by @mserpe, indicating potential buyers are keen to ensure full transparency and trust in the vehicle’s condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received positive comments from various users who appreciate its appearance and performance potential. @JLsKA510 expressed enthusiasm about the car's aesthetic, describing it as a 'beautiful beast.' @ssterry chimed in, complimenting the Malibu's appearance and suggesting that @WolfLV post the dyno sheet to provide more performance insights. Additionally, @Dickiee is eagerly awaiting a driving video, indicating curiosity about the vehicle's driving capabilities, while @WolfLV reassured users that more content, including a driving video, would be available soon.
Neutral: Several users were curious about technical aspects of the vehicle and its history. @14u2b inquired about the instrument cluster and who manufactured it, while @pipchick followed up on concerns about the vehicle's stance and potential damage to the front fender. @dstryr08 queried if @WolfLV was selling this particular car for the same owner as before, suggesting some continuity in ownership that might interest potential buyers. @WolfLV responded that the stance can be lowered, and assured users that there are no issues with the fender, indicating the seller's transparency about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, some users raised concerns about the car's condition. @fastvelle pointed out several issues visible in the posted pictures, including potential rust, paint peeling on the passenger side, and alignment problems with the body. @WolfLV countered with a defense of the vehicle, stating that it is a 'drivers car' with minor imperfections, but acknowledged that there is a history of negative comments from @fastvelle. This indicates a divided opinion on the vehicle's quality, with some users potentially skeptical about its overall condition.
![]() |
17k-Mile 2012 Aston Martin DBS Volante Carbon Edition 6-Speed
SCFFBCCD4CGE13219
Lot 223120
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and rarity. @Longboatkey07 describes it as a 'beautiful car' noting the appeal of having three pedals, while @MrStig calls it a 'beautiful unicorn.' @Arcanic_Aura emphasizes its uniqueness as one of only 44 manual convertible DBS models ever built, and @HemiEddie426 corroborates this fact. @tem246 praises the car's 'Bond style and class,' further enhancing its regard as a luxury item. Commenters also appreciate the craftsmanship, with @Ajamjar remarking on the design's longevity and timeless quality, and @blackjags emphasizing the high-quality leather used in its interior.
Neutral: The discussion includes a practical acknowledgment of the car's condition and features, particularly regarding the leather seats. Some commenters, like @jgriffi1 and @sl600, speculate on the reason for the 'wrinkly' leather, which they suggest could be linked to environmental factors or the durability of the leather used by Aston Martin. @Speedraser and @HemiEddie426 contribute insights about the seat foam and leather quality, noting the potential issues stemming from heat and humidity, which affect soft materials over time. There are also mentions of the car's market performance with @jgriffi1 predicting that this DBS should attract high bids.
Negative: Conversely, there are comments that express concerns about the condition of the vehicle, particularly regarding the seats. @jgriffi1 believes that Aston Martin has long been overdue to address the quality of their seat cushions, calling them a significant drawback, while @RemingtonSR71 mentions the thinner leather's tendency to wear poorly. @HemiEddie426 shares a concern about the leather showing too many signs of age in humid climates, labeling the issue as the 'Shar pei effect.' Overall, the comments reveal a split focus, with many appreciating the car's aesthetics and features, while others raise valid concerns about its material durability and comfort.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @vfnrcc (The Seller) emphasizes the quality and uniqueness of the vehicle, designed to meet the high standards of the Bring a Trailer community. With over 50 years of experience, the Seller prides themselves on honest communication and assuring potential buyers that the vehicles undergo thorough inspections before being listed. Furthermore, the Seller expresses confidence in the excellent condition of the car, particularly highlighting features like a cold start video and driving footage as part of the listing.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @zoltan and @MuShuPork, raise valid questions regarding the maintenance history and specific features of the vehicle. While @Edlash2 noted a discrepancy concerning the absence of navigation in the specifications, these inquiries reflect a keen interest in understanding the car's condition and functionality rather than immediate negativity. The Seller responds promptly to the questions, indicating they are attentive to potential buyer concerns.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by @MuShuPork regarding the lack of comprehensive service records, particularly for a vehicle over 100,000 miles. @Love4x4 expressed doubts about the condition of the vehicle's underside, questioning if there is any rust or corrosion, leading to a clarification from the Seller about minor oxidation present. Additionally, @Edlash2 mentioned unclear pictures affecting the visibility of details, which might deter potential buyers from feeling fully confident in the listing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's great condition and features. @DrJacquesStrappe notes the benefits of the truck, describing it as having a V8 engine, lower miles, and being a west coast vehicle, indicating that it has many years of use left. @StevensCarsPNW (The Seller) emphasizes the truck's straight body, absence of accidents according to the Carfax report, and reassures potential buyers by confirming that everything works as intended and the A/C blows cold. Overall, the positive sentiment surrounds the reliability and functional status of the truck.
Neutral: Commenters brought up a few practical inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifics. @kandsmiles asks about the fit of the spare tire and checks for any smoke odors, while @rg3bonz specifically inquires about the A/C operation, which @StevensCarsPNW confirms is functioning well. Additionally, @HoldenMcGroin expresses curiosity about a discrepancy in the vehicle's trim level per the Carfax report, to which @StevensCarsPNW clarifies that such errors can occur, providing the original window sticker for reference. These inquiries reflect a neutral curiosity and a desire for detailed clarification on the vehicle's attributes.
Negative: Some comments express concerns regarding the vehicle's documentation and history. @dmadd1636 points out the thin maintenance history listed on the Carfax and requests additional information about the vehicle's upkeep. Although @StevensCarsPNW (The Seller) mentions that the previous owner reported a recent water pump replacement, the lack of official records might deter some buyers. Overall, while the truck is presented well, the concerns regarding its maintenance documentation add a layer of uncertainty.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters, including @robfleming and @boaboyoz, expressed admiration for the vehicle, praising its striking Ruby Red Metallic finish and luxurious interior. @rrkinas shared an extensive history of care and maintenance for the car, detailing the meticulous inspections and services it received, which ensures potential buyers of its quality. @911c4s mentioned the joy of driving a drop-top, while @Taisho highlighted several detailed inquiries about the car, which indicates high interest and a genuine desire to understand its features.
Neutral: @rrkinas provided thorough answers to various questions regarding the car's condition and features, such as the state of the top and the availability of certain options like the steering wheel heater. He confirmed that the brakes were recently serviced and the car is ready for the next owner with regular maintenance performed. Additionally, he clarified that the car's history includes careful ownership and maintenance records, including a pre-sale inspection report from BMW that outlines service work done.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about specific details, such as the potential for water damage on the rear seats and the absence of certain types of inspection records, which may leave some buyers apprehensive. @Missybear specifically inquired about the PDK servicing, expressing a need for transparency regarding maintenance costs. @Jessannjoh's question about possible damage indicates a worry about the vehicle's overall condition, which @rrkinas attempted to alleviate by stating he is unaware of any water damage.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @acquire has had a great experience with this seller, describing their transactions as easy and the vehicles as honestly represented. He shared his satisfaction with his Mitsubishi dump truck, highlighting its awesomeness and recommending the seller highly for anyone looking for similar vehicles.
Neutral: @schaeds inquired about the payload capacity of the truck, while @artist2 had a few questions regarding the hydraulic dump functionality, lifting capacity when loaded, and a concern about a torn rubber boot visible in one of the photos. The seller provided clear answers to these inquiries, confirming that the truck is rated at a payload capacity of 350 kg, which aligns with its kei-class regulations, and also assured @artist2 that the CV boot issue would be resolved before the sale.
Negative: There are no negative comments found about the vehicle or the seller in the discussion.
![]() |
1,700-Mile 2023 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Coupe 3LT Z51
1G1YC2D4XP5113463
Lot 223032
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @WishfulThinker23 mentioned that the window sticker can be found in the Carfax report, which suggests that important documentation is available despite concerns raised by others. Additionally, @mcolandojr pointed out that the MSRP of the vehicle is $86,080, indicating a potentially good value depending on its condition and included features.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed curiosity about the vehicle's warranty and maintenance history. @Wanker inquired whether the factory warranty is transferable and when it expires, highlighting a concern about the warranty status for potential buyers. @DLRAZ questioned the timing of the last oil change, which was recorded as October 2024, indicating a potential misunderstanding or typo regarding maintenance records.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @mickeyt regarding the lack of features, mentioning that aside from the 3LT package, there isn't much content, and raising questions about the vehicle's warranty and lack of documentation for crucial maintenance services such as the DCT fluid and filter change. @no.radar criticized the advertisement for not including a window sticker with the photos, which they consider important for buyers, while @1FerrariF40 echoed this sentiment, prompting @WishfulThinker23 to remind them of previous comments regarding the window sticker's availability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the E55 AMG, highlighting it as one of the best cars ever made. @TheLooch mentioned his positive experience after purchasing a similar vehicle, stating that it was the best car decision he ever made. He praised its reliability and expressed an attachment to the car by driving it extensively. @hydraautomotive echoed this sentiment, sharing his joy of owning an E55 AMG and appreciating its combination of performance and aesthetics, noting it looked fantastic with a lovely color combo. Additionally, @Stuttgart_Steel and @Turbo-Tastic praised the car's specifications and rarity, reinforcing a consensus that the vehicle is underrated and highly desirable.
Neutral: Various commenters engaged in discussions centered on the vehicle's condition and details. @bpeverest inquired about the originality of the car's components, showing interest in specifics like paint work and rust. The seller, @CapricornGuy, responded with thorough details, confirming the car is rust-free with original paint and that original floor mats were included, countering concerns that they might be missing. @davidfry805 asked multiple questions about the condition of the car, including inquiries about possible damage and servicing history, which were addressed positively by the seller. Recognizing potential areas for maintenance, @davidfry805 also mentioned the importance of keeping records as he was unable to view the vehicle in person.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @davidfry805 pointed out what appeared to be a crack on the front driver wheel and potential issues with the battery and spark plugs. While @CapricornGuy confirmed the crack was cosmetic and the battery was still functioning, he acknowledged that the spark plugs had likely not been changed. This led to suggestions from @davidfry805 regarding maintenance to ensure the car remains in optimal condition, signaling potential caution for prospective buyers regarding its service needs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @HiSport mentioned that the vehicle is nice overall, which suggests a positive reception from at least some buyers. @ericshin1213 (The Seller) emphasized that the car has been well maintained while being garage-kept and regularly serviced at Rallye Mercedes, indicating it has been cared for properly. This information could instill confidence in potential buyers about the vehicle's history and maintenance. @ericshin1213 (The Seller) also noted that the vehicle is stored safely in their detail center, which helps address concerns about its condition.
Neutral: Questions about the vehicle's condition were raised by a few users. For instance, @sdhny inquired about the tires, specifically if there are two original tires and two replaced, indicating a curiosity about its current state. @raj78’s question about the vehicle's ABC suspension further reflects a practical interest in features rather than a definitive stance on its quality. Additionally, @davidjbo asked about potential wear on seat memory buttons in the listed images, which suggests that while there are concerns, they are not necessarily negative in nature.
Negative: There were several concerns raised that could affect potential buyer perceptions. @BILLTKC pointed out that the vehicle's paint appeared dull with swirl marks, requesting further clarification, including detailed pictures of the undercarriage and a video demonstration of various features, indicating possible skepticism about the car's overall condition. Similarly, @HiSport pointed out some potential issues, like damage to the underbody pan and curbed rear wheels, as well as asking about the functionality of the seats and other interior components. @5821driver raised a suspicion about the car possibly being a smoker's vehicle, although this was refuted by @ericshin1213 (The Seller), who insisted that the car smells fresh, indicating mixed signals about the vehicle's previous use.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz praises the vehicle for its stylish Steel Gray color and commends the tremendous build quality, expressing a positive sentiment overall. The enthusiasm in the comment highlights the appealing aesthetics and craftsmanship of the vehicle, suggesting that it's an impressive example in its category.
Neutral: @Fastduramax poses an insightful question about the frame around the steering box, indicating a concern that is significant for Squarebody models. This comment reflects a practical consideration that potential buyers may have, implying that while the build seems impressive, structural integrity is an important factor that requires confirmation. @JYJRH also neutrally inquires about the possibility of additional documentation in the form of videos, showing interest in the vehicle's functionality, particularly the air conditioning system.
Negative: There are no overtly negative comments about the vehicle. However, the inquiries from @Fastduramax about potential frame concerns and @JYJRH's request for assurance about air conditioning may suggest underlying worries regarding the vehicle's performance and reliability. While these comments reflect a cautious approach rather than outright negativity, they highlight areas of uncertainty that might cloud potential buyers' impressions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the SL as absolutely beautiful, while @Tdot_MB praises the beautiful color combo. @Judgejohn points out the beauty of the car, although he seeks clarification on whether the refinishing in 2023 means it was repainted. @August007 calls the 450SL beautiful, commending its outstanding interior and exterior. @Lubedude1 appreciates the car's aesthetics but seeks more information on its functionality and condition. @macarbon_johnnyb shares admiration for the euro configuration, stating it transforms the appearance of the car, while also noting the fantastic job done on the upholstery. @crownstooge cannot take their eyes off the car, particularly attracted to the euro bumpers and headlights. @wdbcoupe echoes this sentiment, marveling at how phenomenal the SL looks and extending congratulations to the prospective new owner.
Neutral: @treetrimmer raises a question regarding the car's history in Minnesota and comments on the custom wood treatment, emphasizing that it is a subjective choice depending on personal taste. @Loocious queries the car's stance, wondering if it appears high in the front and low in the rear, which @macarbon_johnnyb addresses by explaining that this is a common characteristic of SLs and suggests possible adjustments for improvement. @JaimePitu inquires about any repairs made since acquiring the vehicle, asking if there are urgent repairs needed, while @Xzjnpn questions the seller's willingness to answer inquiries, suggesting reliance on alternative sources like AI for answers.
Negative: There are some concerns mentioned by commenters such as @fdagher, who notes the absence of an armrest, and @Judgejohn, who raises questions around the refinishing work. @macarbon_johnnyb mentions the steering wheel's poor design compared to modern standards, implying that it detracts from the car's appeal. @Loocious and @jasonmullin highlight potential issues with the car's sitting height and the timing chain, respectively, indicating areas of worry for prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters are enthusiastic about the vehicle's aesthetic and performance features. @Viper_Daytona described it as another beauty from WOB, while @BigT77 praised the hardtop convertible's dual appearances and the impressive 600-plus horsepower. @boaboyoz referred to the 488 Spider as a "Bianco Avus beauty," highlighting it as a lovely example offered by a legendary seller and wishing them well in the auction. @Wob (The Seller) also expressed excitement about the combination of white over black in the Spider, pointing out the attractive specifications that include various carbon fiber components, sport exhaust, and improvements that make it a pleasure to drive.
Neutral: The seller, @Wob, provided in-depth information about the car, emphasizing the importance of potential buyers thoroughly reviewing the auction details. They encouraged bidders to schedule inspections early due to potentially high demand and also to reach out with any inquiries. @Wob addressed common questions about auction procedures, such as the addition of videos and outdoor photos during the auction, and reassured bidders about the posting of relevant information and documentation. This transparency aims to create an enjoyable auction experience, lessening any uncertainties about the buying process.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns and inquiries about the lack of certain details. @Flat-12 asked for information regarding the service history, and @carguy101 pointed out the absence of a driving video, which is often seen as essential for evaluating performance. @Spinsane inquired about the presence of paint protection film (PPF) and whether any blemishes were related to it. @Wob addressed these questions, noting that the car had gone through free maintenance from Ferrari, making service records less common, and confirmed the presence of full-car PPF.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Beetagh remarks on the vehicle's good condition, noting it appears fairly well maintained despite its mileage. @gscharnagl also observes the car is in good shape for its age and requests additional close-up photos of noted imperfections. @Captain_Cruz_Control shares enthusiasm about the power of the twin-turbocharged V12 engine, suggesting that Mercedes dominated the performance market in the 2000s. @dna.autowholesale (The Seller) emphasizes the car's excellent mechanical condition and reliable engine performance, while @Static50, an experienced owner of similar vehicles, expresses confidence that the car represents good value. @zachmac highlights the extensive, costly maintenance that has been performed on the vehicle, underlining its potential for enjoyment and reliability when properly serviced.
Neutral: @dna.autowholesale (The Seller) confirms that while there are no service records available, the car was regularly maintained, and offers reassurance about its operational readiness, mentioning it's in good mechanical condition apart from some cosmetic details like a cracked antenna and delaminating rear window. Commenters like @cottrd note that the vehicle requires attention to some issues, but still sees it as a good purchase opportunity if bought at a favorable price. There are mentions of the need for regular maintenance and timely replacements of parts like coil packs and seats, indicating a mix of caution and optimism about the vehicle's upkeep and longevity.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the vehicle's maintenance history, particularly by @Motts71 who inquires if the coil packs have been replaced, while @Jaxxt17 echoes apprehension about the condition of the left bolster and also questions the availability of a maintenance history from Mercedes. @cottrd warns about the expensive upkeep associated with the S65 series, sharing personal experiences that indicate significant repair costs, including a noted need for new ABC lines and timing belts. @zachmac further questions the claims regarding brake replacements due to the observed condition of the rotors, showcasing skepticism about the documented maintenance history of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Carzz appreciates the vehicle as a remarkable survivor that showcases the luxury of upscale motoring over a century ago. @Silberpfeil expresses admiration for the car's resilience, noting its ability to withstand the Great Depression without restoration, highlighting its perfect condition and aged beauty. @dagmar82 advocates for preserving the car as is, celebrating its historical significance and worn appearance as a badge of honor. The comments from @Sparrownaut and @MotoringInvestments echo similar sentiments, praising the car's patina and survival against time.
Neutral: @59turner humorously observes the age comparison between the vehicle in the video and contemporary trucks, while @Duncan_same_old raises technical concerns about the generator's performance as a starter motor, suggesting challenges in getting the car started. Information provided by @67deuce2, the seller, clarifies that the disc wheels were a factory option and discusses additional features like the onboard air compressor and tools in the trunk, addressing potential inquiries from interested buyers.
Negative: @Duncan_same_old brings up potential issues with the car's startup mechanism, indicating that it may be hard to start, a detail that could deter prospective buyers. Although no overtly negative comments were made about the car's overall desirability, @waburchill1's practical inquiry about the vehicle's height suggests a cautious approach to understanding the logistics of dealing with such an antique vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered positive comments regarding its aesthetics and performance. @STButler expressed admiration for the gorgeous seats, wishing they could be in their living room, indicating the car's appealing interior design. @jdt10768 also commented on the car being nice, and @Johnwhilmore (The Seller) shared that the vehicle comes with original black seat covers, adding to its attractive features. Additionally, @AVMaster619 remarked on the quality of the seats, while @Johnwhilmore stated that the car is highlighted by its impressive power, claiming that DINAN's upgrades provide a real sense of the horsepower.
Neutral: Comments also included inquiries about the vehicle's upgrades and condition. @camarolynn asked if the AC and cruise control are functional and mentioned the clear coat peeling on the trunk lid, which @Johnwhilmore acknowledged but clarified that the AC works and the check engine light has never been on. @BavarianWheels asked about the undercarriage damage, to which @Johnwhilmore assured that the accident damage was minimal and had been adequately addressed, further elaborating on the car’s repair and maintenance history in response to other commenters.
Negative: However, there were some concerns raised about the vehicle's condition, especially regarding the subframe damage. @AVMaster619 referred to a 'failed subframe,' prompting further questions from @throttlehaus about potential repairs. @Johnwhilmore addressed these issues, noting that there were some broken spot welds but stating that the subframe was overall as it came from the factory. Moreover, @VolvoguyKC made a comment about the quality of the vehicle's photography, suggesting that improvements could be made in showcasing the car's features more effectively.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @jboji514 mentioned that Zanzibar is the best color for the LR4, expressing a positive sentiment about its appearance. @WagonLife called the vehicle a 'beaut,' praising its aesthetics further. Multiple commentors such as @tgr8 and @BostonCarGuy echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing their appreciation for the vehicle's color.
Neutral: @DartosFC (The Seller) clarified some questions regarding the vehicle features and maintenance history, acknowledging a typo in the listing regarding the dual-range transfer case. Several commenters, including @BostonCarGuy and @DrMattyB, raised questions about the condition of the vehicle, specifically concerning tires and the potential for overheating, to which the seller provided details about repairs and maintenance that were done.
Negative: @reibrown raised concerns about potential water damage, while @newtoytundra expressed shock at dealership service costs, hinting at concerns about the vehicle's upkeep. @Collectibleclassics remarked that the vehicle still has a long way to go, indicating skepticism about the current state of the sale. Additionally, @DrMattyB highlighted issues with the rear ceiling sagging, suggesting that this could be a problem for prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the 1991 Audi 100, highlighting it as a 'beautiful survivor' with a clean appearance and excellent condition after years of maintenance. @MAnderson999 appreciated its aesthetic value, while @Angelleena mentioned the enjoyable sound of the engine, referring to it affectionately as the '1-2-4-5-3 roar.' @Hansjorg (The Seller) shared insights about the car's history, confirming its previous ownership by a Swiss bank executive and detailing the diligent maintenance that has been performed, including fluid changes and new tires, which enhanced the vehicle's reliability and performance.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about practical aspects of owning and maintaining a Euro-spec vehicle like the Audi 100, particularly in the United States. @ritzta asked about the challenges of servicing such a vintage car, to which @Hansjorg (The Seller) responded that he has had no problems sourcing parts or getting service done. @bsinnott911 added information about Switzerland's stringent vehicle inspection process that ensures older cars are well-maintained. @The_Sage also posed questions about the condition of the dash cluster and suspension, which were answered positively by @Hansjorg, indicating no significant issues.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about past Audi models and their reliability. @no.radar reminisced about more challenging experiences with older models, while @akcapbring recalled difficulties related to a previous Audi they owned, such as issues with door handles and power steering. This sentiment suggests a wariness about potential maintenance issues that could arise with older German vehicles. Overall, while the current Audi in discussion appears to be in good condition, past experiences with similar models cast a shadow of doubt for some potential owners.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the vehicle's exceptional condition and nostalgic value, with many users, including @SimplyAnEnthusiast99, expressing that it belongs in a museum, highlighting its status as a unique time capsule of Honda's engineering excellence. @Harrdware points out the superb build quality, comparing it favorably to European brands from the same era, while @Talbot78SC appreciates its maintenance and the correct tires fitted, which promise great longevity for the next owner. Enthusiasts like @lincnessmonster and @GHUA reiterate its beauty, making it clear that this 1989 Accord SE-i is held in high regard as a piece of automotive history.
Neutral: Several comments provide context about the car's rarity and the legacy of the Honda Accord during its peak years. @Ultramusique emphasizes its model significance, while @acura2024 and @DeusEquitare question the lack of service history prior to 2025, which is explained by the seller as being due to limited use in its early years. Commentators such as @Fihsak and @piedmont07 reflect on their personal experiences with similar models, highlighting the feelings of nostalgia and how these vehicles have become collectible items, though acknowledging that current market values can be hard to gauge.
Negative: Some comments reveal a sense of loss or lamentation that such a well-preserved car may not be used as it was intended. @jblumbee mentions the struggle of wanting to drive a well-made car but also recognizing that high value can lead to reduced usability. Additionally, @greenIndian notes that had the car been a 5-speed manual, it might fetch an even higher price, indicating a lingering concern that the automatic transmission could detract from its appeal for purists. Furthermore, @DMose hints at a market disconnect, suggesting prices might not truly reflect the significance of the vehicle to collectors.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the stunning appearance and unique color combination of the Rolls Royce Phantom. @dollycat3 described it as an "absolutely gorgeous" vehicle, while @dmiller000 expressed admiration for the exterior color, deeming it "spot on". @89lincolntc also praised the car's allure when viewed in person and termed it an "absolutely magnificent example". @enthusiastic_enthusiast (The Seller) emphasized their commitment to a high-quality presentation of the vehicle and expressed excitement about the auction, noting the car's many positive qualities and an impressive future ahead.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions regarding maintenance and specific details about the vehicle. @silverclouder simply inquired about potential issues with the vehicle's control arms, and @johndog1957 provided a thorough list of cosmetic concerns, including cracks in the veneers and the parking brake mechanism. @benzjag sought advice on yearly repair costs and highlighted the mixed opinions on owning a Phantom, particularly regarding high repair costs. @enthusiastic_enthusiast (The Seller) responded to most inquiries warmly and provided useful details, affirming that the car had minor cosmetic flaws but was mechanically sound, with only the parking brake requiring attention.
Negative: Concerns were expressed about the vehicle's condition and potential high costs associated with ownership. @antonvt noted the challenges of maintaining a car that had seen "salty winters", suggesting that any suspension work could be a significant headache. @RRDOCT0R pointed out that the tires were incorrectly sized, potentially affecting ride height and safety. @johndog1957 echoed these concerns, discussing the age of the tires and the need for correct replacements. @robstone and @benzjag emphasized the high maintenance costs associated with Phantom ownership, with @johndog1957 mentioning an average yearly cost of $16,500, causing potential buyers to hesitate due to the steep expenses involved.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the bike's appeal as an ideal gift for young beginners. @Rpl1 (The Seller) emphasizes its user-friendly features, such as the replacement Baja 70CC motor and an easy-to-use 4-speed automatic transmission, making it suitable for new riders. Commenters like @jdp206 express their hope to win the bike for their grandson, while @Coachburt praises its beautiful appearance and the joy it could bring a child during Christmas. Another user, @SAMURAI99, reinforces the bike's collector-grade quality, indicating that it's a unique find that should command high value at auction.
Neutral: The comments reflect a mix of interaction between bidders and the seller. @Rpl1 (The Seller) responds to various users, thanking them for their bids and wishing them luck. The seller also invites past bidders to take another look at the auction and reminds potential buyers about the approaching Christmas deadline to inspire early holiday shopping. The discussions include logistical notes about pickup locations, shipping assistance, and reminders about auction timelines, keeping the conversation informative and engaging.
Negative: There aren't many negative comments about the vehicle; however, some remarks suggest that the bike is rare and hard to find in clean condition, implying that potential buyers might face competition. There's a slight mention of typographical errors from @Rpl1 (The Seller) which may detract from the overall professionalism regarding the auction. Still, the prevailing theme is overwhelmingly positive, with no outright criticisms of the bike's condition or features.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the appealing design and enjoyment of the vehicle, with @BigT77 praising its vintage motorcycle aesthetics and @JGraham noting its retro look that captures attention. @Wray shares his positive experience owning a Halcyon 250, appreciating its reliability and simplicity, while @jpc424 mentions enjoying it on back roads and enhancing performance with the MotoCult kit. The bike seems to garner admiration from onlookers and offers a distinct presence at events according to multiple commenters.
Neutral: Comments indicate a mix of curiosity and experience among potential buyers and current owners. @doshrink reflects on interest sparked by sightings on television, questioning the seller about the reason for selling so soon. @djimbe notes the local connection to the bike's production and seeks insights on performance, mentioning it might not suit freeway riding. @Buds52 (The Seller) provides straightforward details about the sale, including health reasons and the bike's transferable warranty, emphasizing communication with interested parties.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns related to the seller's health and usage limitations. @Buds52 (The Seller) repeatedly mentions health issues impacting the sale, indicating age-related challenges like leg and hip problems. @Wray shares his own knee problems and reduced riding activity, expressing a similar situation as the seller. Additionally, @03redrocket clarifies that while the bike is fun, it may not be ideal for long highway rides, suggesting limitations in its utility.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ANCMatt appreciates the iconic design of the Subaru, noting its recognizable appearance compared to modern vehicles, which brings a sense of nostalgia for both the '90s and contemporary eras. @57charlie recounts a positive personal experience with a similar model in New Zealand, highlighting its comfort, handling, and performance. @wes936 sees the potential of this car as an educational tool for his son, likely teaching him to drive manually in a right-hand drive vehicle, which he feels would be a cool experience.
Neutral: @DarkShadow983 expresses interest in purchasing the vehicle and seeks clarification on the interior's odor, particularly inquiring whether it has a smoke smell. The seller, @lm-barupnw, responds positively, stating that there are no smoke odors, indicating that neither previous nor current owners were smokers. Discussions among commenters, including @heeltoes and @RMQ333, revolve around the potential concerns regarding the engine, compression testing, and the reliability of the vehicle, with a general consensus forming around the strengths and weaknesses of the Subaru's engine.
Negative: A few concerns were raised by various commenters, particularly @DarkShadow983, who brought up the potential for ringland failure in older Subaru models and requested reassurance about the engine's health. @heeltoes and @DarkShadow983 explore and debate the reliability of the engine, particularly in relation to design changes over the years. @57charlie voices a caution regarding the suitability of a right-hand drive vehicle for new drivers, suggesting that left-hand drive may be a safer option for inexperienced drivers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @sws615 expresses a long-standing appreciation for these cars, praising the aesthetic combination of black and dark tan, indicating a hope for the vehicle's success in the market. @desicar shares fond memories of driving a similar model, noting its cool appearance and wishing well for both the buyer and seller, reflecting a nostalgic admiration for the car. @lindbrosracing, who has experience selling these cars, states that a good Jensen Healey is a steal in today's market due to its reliable performance and easy maintenance, as well as the availability of parts.
Neutral: @meremer, the seller, explains the reasons for selling the vehicle, citing a recent reduction in their collection after selling off a warehouse. Several commentators ask questions regarding specific features and conditions of the vehicle, such as the floor pans, rust condition, and seating details, indicating a moderated interest in understanding the car's state. Comments also address the specifics of modifications and original features, establishing a factual dialogue around the car's specifications and history.
Negative: @rjr59AH raises concerns about the low mileage since purchase, questioning the seller about their reasons for buying and subsequently selling the car. @HwyDriver expresses skepticism about the vehicle’s idle quality based on the walk-around video, implying potential issues. Others, such as @dnrcarrharness, express a desire for more detailed photos and information regarding rust, leaks, and the soft top, indicating doubts regarding the car's overall condition and readiness to drive.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @AuburnCasey expressed a fondness for the model, hinting at interesting history that could be uncovered. @frankstefko, the seller, provided details about the vehicle's meticulous maintenance, emphasizing their long-term affection for the car which they leased before purchasing. Additional comments highlighted the impressive features of the Portfolio model, including standard includes such as front seat massagers and rear window shades, making it an attractive option for potential buyers.
Neutral: @racerboy221 raised a technical question regarding the replacement engine, inquiring about whether it was a crate motor and the mileage on both the engine and chassis at the time of installation. @dpj1 also sought clarification on the Portfolio submodel, looking for additional features beyond those mentioned by @frankstefko. @CKart suggested a headlight cleanse to enhance the car's appearance, indicating minor improvements could be made without criticizing the vehicle.
Negative: Some comments suggest a lack of clarity regarding the vehicle's specifications, as @Mongoose55 sought to confirm the mileage on the replacement engine and whether it was indeed a new crate engine. While generally positive, these questions imply uncertainties around the specifications that could be cause for concern for potential buyers. Additionally, @CKart's request for a walkaround or driving video suggests there might be a desire for more visual evidence of the car's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @JoshFred95 described the truck as good-looking, indicating a favorable overall aesthetic. @RSGarm (The Seller) received positive feedback about the condition of the wheels, which are in very good shape and look great according to the Seller's response to @hueypilot. Additionally, the Seller assured potential buyers that the interior smells fine, reinforcing the appeal of the vehicle.
Neutral: @RSGarm (The Seller) addressed inquiries from @fa8thful and @vikes8411 directly, noting that all accessories except for the oil temperature gauge operate correctly and confirming the truck's non-smoking history. The Seller also mentioned they would provide further details on the tire date codes in a follow-up, showing responsiveness to potential buyers' queries. Furthermore, @BadAzp highlighted the date of manufacture, which gives context about the vehicle's age and condition, while @Uvacarbuff suggested they have a similar truck, which may attract interest.
Negative: Comments from @fa8thful raised concerns regarding the vehicle's history, asking about any accidents or repairs that may not be reflected in the Carfax report and whether the vehicle had been smoked in, which could suggest issues with the interior's condition. @RSGarm (The Seller) admitted to having limited information on any accidents beyond what is shared in the Carfax report, which could be seen as a drawback for potential buyers. Overall, the feedback indicates some uncertainty regarding the truck's full history and condition, making some buyers cautious.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ivanxmachina described the vehicle as gorgeous, indicating a strong aesthetic appeal. @TheJeremiah expressed nostalgia for the unique color combination, highlighting its standout features and desirability among collectors. Multiple commenters, including @sculptrock and @Jswerve, praised the car's beautiful appearance, underscoring its allure as a classic BMW M3 model.
Neutral: The seller, Nahasmotorcars, provided detailed information regarding the car's condition, including the mechanical and cosmetic aspects. They mentioned the need for a washer fluid tank specific to the CSL front bumper, which is a minor issue amid the overall excellent condition of the car. The seller also confirmed that the car could have undergone various checks, including inspections of the rod bearings and Vanos system, but the previous ownership history remains partially unknown regarding the big three services.
Negative: Some potential buyers raised concerns about necessary maintenance tasks, with @Pizzadude2010 stressing that at 76k miles, the rod bearings might need attention. @Gabriel053 pointed out the lack of certain original features, such as aluminum trim and ZCP wheels, which could affect the car's value. Additionally, @Roc123 expressed disappointment at not being able to view the car in person, suggesting a lack of opportunity for firsthand evaluation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the impressive condition and history of the truck, with @Mr17Aquasport expressing excitement over its rarity and cleanliness, particularly due to its manual 5-speed transmission. @Mxstyles reminisced about the nostalgia associated with the design of these trucks, stating that very few remain in such pristine condition with recent upgrades. Additionally, @nick997911 emphasized the mechanical perfection achieved after a significant investment in restoration, along with the compliments received from others, indicating the truck's appeal.
Neutral: Several inquiries and exchanges of information occurred regarding the truck's features and specifications. @fedo asked about the differential gear ratio, receiving confirmation from @nick997911 that it's 3.73. Questions about emissions tests were answered, with @nick997911 confirming successful compliance. Some commenters, like @johncunningham, appreciated the quick responses about seating adjustments and the incorporation of a new crate motor, while @hairyolds humorously pointed out the availability of windshield washer fluid, suggesting it was an easy fix for potential buyers.
Negative: Some skepticism was noted regarding modifications made to the truck, particularly around the removal of the fuel injection system in favor of a carburetor. @RWN525 and @hairyolds raised questions about the conversion process and its reliability. There were concerns regarding the practical aspects of daily driving, as seen in @beauj's query about fuel efficiency, to which @nick997911 candidly replied it's likely around 10 mpg, indicating it's not an economy vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Caymanorcarrera expresses that the C6 Corvette is visually appealing, appreciating its solid black interior and overall aesthetics. @TimAllums agrees, noting that C6 Corvettes are a great bang for the buck and are stunning in appearance. @Eliteman shares his love for the C6 models he has owned, stating he plans to keep his current dream car for a long time, emphasizing the enjoyment he has found in these vehicles despite some features like the heads-up display being absent.
Neutral: @Sean29 (The Seller) provides specific answers to questions posed by other commenters, including confirming that the car retains its catalytic converters and detailing the stock gear ratio as 3.42:1 in the manual. He also answers inquiries about tire condition, stating they have approximately 40% tread left and mentioning the aftermarket exhaust system still utilizes the original muffler. He notes that his car is a 1LT model and comments on its good mechanical condition, including the harmonic balancer.
Negative: @cem350z raises a concern about the lack of a heads-up display in the Corvette, implying it detracts from the overall experience. @Notmydadscorvette reflects on his own ownership experience, downplaying the significance of the HUD feature. @V8addiction asks about the status of the harmonic balancer, potentially indicating concern about the vehicle's maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle for its unique features and upgrades, including its custom paint job and the durability of Land Cruisers. @puravida2025 specifically noted the beauty of the paint job, while others like @Dawnpatrol450 pointed out the potential of the vehicle as an overland rig with just a few modifications. The seller, @thedoylegroup, demonstrated thorough knowledge about the vehicle's condition and history, which further adds to the positive impression of it being a well-maintained ride. The original tires being less than a year old was also mentioned positively, as they could be resold to help fund the purchase of off-road tires.
Neutral: Several commenters asked clarifying questions related to the vehicle's specifications and features, indicating an interest in understanding its full capabilities. @bigsky47 inquired about the availability of third-row seats, while @1974_911S and others sought additional details about the vehicle's condition, such as potential leaks and the working order of AC and heat. @Archer84's questions about the instrument cluster swap and the printing of mileage reflect a need for transparency regarding the vehicle's history without casting a negative light on its current state. The seller provided thorough answers and reassured buyers about the vehicle's integrity, maintaining an informative dialogue.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle, particularly involving the modification of the instrument cluster which has led to questions about the accuracy of the mileage displayed. @Archer84 explicitly pointed out this aspect, which might lead potential buyers to wonder about the vehicle's maintenance history. There were also remarks about inconsistencies in parts, like the driver seat that looks replaced, as noted by @jsloden. Additionally, @McMudFlap raised questions about the TPMS light on the dashboard, indicating that it is not supported by this vehicle due to the new instrument panel, which may cause hesitation among buyers regarding its overall reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ToddStormMountain expresses excitement about the Fiat 600D, highlighting its history as a dealership collection piece and the positive attention it garners. Previous owners @ergvepeog and @99779977 are invited to share their experiences, demonstrating a sense of community around the vehicle. @Commanderinchief fondly recalls their own experience with the Fiat 600D as their first car, which adds a nostalgic touch to the auction.
Neutral: @ToddStormMountain notes the vehicle has undergone a comprehensive service totaling over $4,000, ensuring its mechanical soundness. The car was primarily used as a display in the showroom and is now being offered for auction, indicating a shift from static display to active sale. The acknowledgment of the vehicle's top speed of nearly 80 miles an hour is mentioned, although some, like @patocuack, question the accuracy of the speedometer's readings.
Negative: Some potential concerns about the Fiat 600D are raised, particularly by @patocuack, who suggests that the claimed top speed may be overly optimistic. There is a hint of skepticism regarding the brake system, as indicated by @MercuryKG7H's comment about the brake "shows". Overall, no major red flags were raised, but a cautious perspective on performance specs is present.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @RoyalKnight79 noted that for a 2nd gen F body, the rust is minimal, making it a solid starting point for a project. @kurtwvf mentioned the interior looks decent and expressed admiration for the color, indicating they would consider it if they weren't already committed to their own project. @mcj4250 remarked on the car's overall condition, asserting that it surpasses what many had during their school years, highlighting the sturdiness of the door skins and seat cushions. @Gmmuscleusa and @darkstar0821 echoed these sentiments by remarking on the car's solid appearance and great color, with Gmmuscleusa calling it a great TA to tinker with. Overall, many comments emphasize the potential for restoration and the appealing characteristics of the vehicle.
Neutral: @TheMindGoblin (The Seller) clarified that he refers to it as a project due to its unfinished status, while expressing hope that the next owner can transform it into something special. He mentioned the interior is original and in excellent condition, with no headliner sag, and explained the absence of the carburetor. Several users, including @markbartlett and @wschakel, inquired about specific details regarding the car's condition, engine, and history. Notably, @Jocko315 offered parts for restoration, highlighting community support for potential buyers and restoration enthusiasts.
Negative: On the flip side, not all feedback was positive. @Ramenator pointed out that while the engine looks rough, it is salvageable, whereas @darkstar0821 expressed skepticism about the Olds 403 engine, preferring a Pontiac engine for authenticity. @south_paw also noted the engine's comparatively low horsepower, suggesting it's not ideal for performance. There were comments regarding potential concerns about the vehicle's history and overall condition, like @asarobin52's inquiry about possible wreckage and @wschakel's question about whether the engine turns over. @moremoney2 had their comment flagged as non-constructive, which reflects some divisiveness within the discussion about the vehicle's quality and expected restorability.
![]() |
18k-Mile 2019 Mazda MX-5 Miata 30th Anniversary Edition 6-Speed
JM1NDAA7XK0400338
Lot 223092
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the seller, @orangez06, as proactive and open to questions, providing detailed information about the car's history and specifications. He mentions that the vehicle has been garage-kept, has had regular oil changes, and comes with original parts, which suggests care in maintenance. Moreover, the 30th Anniversary Edition is appreciated for its unique color and limited production, with several users praising the Miata's features and explaining that the car is one of the most desirable models with modern specs.
Neutral: There are mixed reactions regarding the bidding process, with some users like @BigTopGT expressing confusion over the bidding system but also showing excitement for the car. There is acknowledgment of the specter of price fluctuations, with comments indicating that the car's value may be debated, particularly its asking price. Others, such as @Triumph27, point out that while the high bid may not represent the car's true market value, it reflects the enthusiasm around this particular vehicle and its limited availability.
Negative: Conversely, there are several criticisms directed at the seller's handling of the auction process, with comments regarding the misleading presentation of the vehicle's condition and the clarity around repairs made to the wheels. User @burton227 points out that the listing has been seen across multiple platforms with falling prices, which raises suspicions about the auction's legitimacy. Furthermore, there are concerns about the seller's attitude towards inquiries, with @bhhumphrey mentioning unresponsive and evasive answers to potential buyers' questions about the car’s damage history, which some imply could point to larger transparency issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments enthusiastically praised the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and craftsmanship. @Dollycat3 referred to the car as 'gorgeous', while @DetailDave expressed admiration for its cleanliness, wishing the auction success. Additionally, @JosephAuto described it as a 'work of art', highlighting the love put into its restoration. Commenters like @Steeler85048 and @Lord_Balfour_IV reinforced this sentiment by calling it an 'incredible example' and questioning if there is any vehicle more beautiful, respectively. @ssclassic also acknowledged the beauty of the Jaguar, appreciating its history and wishing for it to find a suitable new owner.
Neutral: Several participants engaged in discussions surrounding the vehicle's ownership history, seeking clarity due to perceived discrepancies. @BXL initiated this line of inquiry, questioning the vehicle's sales history before the current listing. @racer355, the seller, provided a detailed explanation, indicating that the car had indeed been sold before but returned to his possession due to the previous owner not being suited for vintage cars. This information seemed to settle some concerns among commenters, but it highlighted the complexity of the vehicle's history, causing some to seek elaboration on past sales without necessarily visiting the auction.
Negative: There was a noticeable undercurrent of tension regarding comments and interactions. @Slenhoff criticized another user for unhelpful comments and asserted that all viewers of the auction should be treated with respect, while @racer355 defended his position about catering to bidders over commentators. @64etype provided critical observations about the car's restoration quality, pointing out deviations from original specifications, suggesting areas that could be improved prior to driving the vehicle. These concerns indicated some skepticism among commenters about the integrity of the restoration process and how it might affect the car's value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle reflect a strong admiration for its aesthetic and driving capabilities. @TSR90210 praises the unique color combination, noting it as a 'beautiful' and 'rare' option that will attract attention and bring home awards. @DanielWebber expresses his love for the truck, wishing he could own it, and imagines using it to share his faith at car shows, indicating a sense of community connection through the vehicle. @Woodland66 contributes positively by highlighting the well-thought-out design, referring to a hose as a drain which adds practicality to the truck's aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: The questions from @Wheels8 and @OnlyLaSalle show curiosity and a desire for more detailed information about the vehicle's specifications and history. @Wheels8 inquires about the truck's electrical system and performance on the highway, while @OnlyLaSalle raises several technical questions regarding the truck's components and ownership history. The seller, @CardiffClassics, provides informative responses, confirming a running 6V electrical system, addressing performance capabilities on the freeway, and mentioning the previous owner's age and health as factors in the sale.
Negative: On the negative side, there is a slight apprehension regarding the vehicle's unknown history and some components. @OnlyLaSalle's inquiries reveal concerns about the reliability of the truck given the lack of detailed past ownership information. Additionally, curiosity about certain features such as the mystery hose and the rear end ratio indicates a potential lack of transparency that could affect buyer confidence. Despite these questions, the overall tone suggests a sense of hope and anticipation for the vehicle's potential.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @SnoDawg expresses enthusiasm for the spirit of the vehicle's listing, suggesting it embodies the adventurous nature of the site. @Caymanorcarrera compliments its beauty and originality, advocating for the next owner to maintain its authenticity as a 'survivor' with a well-patinaed appearance. @rbikerescue voices gladness at seeing such a vehicle listed on Bring a Trailer, appreciating its status as a diamond in the rough. @Motogrotto also celebrates its status as a 'sweet survivor', noting that often the 'crustiest' bikes run the best.
Neutral: @JackPiner inquires about the vehicle's history and clarifies details regarding its side panels, noting they were unavailable until a later model. @Eaats33 asks for further photos regarding the fuel tank, suggesting it would help in assessing the bike. @Jfp58 agrees with Eaats33 about the side covers and shares a negative experience with a feature on a later model. @Premierautofl, the seller, outlines the bike's unique selling points and history while introducing additional context about the importance of the bike's patina and the attention it commands at shows.
Negative: @Giddie-Up critiques the term 'patina', labeling the visible aging as rust, while @Nate echoes this sentiment by calling out the idea of patina as a cover for neglect, also expressing cautious interest in the bidding process. @BlindLemonPie emphasizes concerns about the cold start process of the bike and suggests that sellers should be informed on proper techniques. @Stevenage expresses discomfort with the method used to demonstrate the cold start, suggesting a surface temperature gauge instead. @JustKip shares skepticism about the cold start claims, furthering the discussion around the bike's engine performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 2009 Chevrolet Corvette Callaway SC580 is praised for its impressive performance and low mileage of just 13,000 miles. @BigT77 commented that the Callaway modifications have made for a 'fast sled' and highlighted it as a great value for anyone winning the auction. The RumbleAuto seller also expresses excitement for potential buyers, emphasizing the joy this impressive car can bring to its new owner. Additionally, the seller notes the car's pristine condition and accident-free history as a major selling point, reassuring potential bidders of its quality.
Neutral: The seller, @RumbleAuto, has provided extensive documentation and visual proof of the car's condition, including detailed photographs and videos, which add credibility to the auction listing. They invite potential bidders to view the vehicle in person and have mentioned that it is stored off-site, requiring appointments for viewings. The auction details are clear, and the seller addresses payment and transport expectations after the auction, contributing to a transparent bidding process.
Negative: There are some concerns about the auction format and the seller's strict payment and transport policies. @RumbleAuto indicates that winning bidders must arrange for payment and transportation within a week of the auction's end, which some may find a bit restrictive. There is no mention of any warranty or service details, which could be important for potential buyers considering such a high-performance vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 2016 Range Rover Supercharged is described as stunning, particularly with its gorgeous Mariana Black exterior and stylish Ebony & White interior. Commentors such as @GovernorCedric and @OverRovered appreciate its aesthetic appeal, noting that it is worth watching in the auction. @PrivateCollectionMotors highlights the vehicle's many desirable features, including a panoramic roof, Meridian audio system, and heated seats, drawing positive attention from potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding the vehicle's service history and any known issues. @onebadrover raised concerns about the absence of maintenance records and the status of specific recalls, while @CamBates99 requested information about the availability of cooled seats. @PrivateCollectionMotors confirmed that there are no known issues with the car and pointed to Carfax for service records, acknowledging the need for inspections prior to bidding and offering assistance with scheduling them.
Negative: Concerns were expressed by @onebadrover regarding the lack of service history and the recall for a cracked steering knuckle that has not been addressed. He emphasized the importance of comprehensive maintenance records, which @OverRovered agreed with, stating that reliance on Carfax could be insufficient. Furthermore, @Chevrolet84 questioned the vehicle's air suspension, wondering if there are any leaks when the vehicle is stationary for an extended period, adding to the uncertainty surrounding its reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the HMMWV as awesome and cool, expressing enthusiasm for the vehicle. @testdummypilot (The Seller) highlights their long-standing family business history since 1946, emphasizing transparency through extensive photos and videos that accurately describe the vehicle's condition. They strive for customer satisfaction and accountability, aiming to ensure buyers feel confident in their purchase decisions. @ToddCorey expresses excitement about the vehicle after a previous disappointing experience, indicating potential interest in adapting it for personal needs.
Neutral: @demoman inquires about the vehicle's heat function, to which @testdummypilot (The Seller) humorously confirms it works well. Several questions address the vehicle's specifications, such as its diesel engine and rear axle ratios. @Nashville_Paul and @ITUCO both ask about the vehicle's title and certification for civilian use. @testdummypilot clarifies the vehicle is street-legal and responds to @ToddCorey regarding potential modifications, ensuring the seller is open to discussing buyer adaptations.
Negative: @nikojo raises concerns about the registration challenges in various states, suggesting that just because the vehicle is titled in one state doesn't mean it can be registered in another. @savagebilt counters some misconceptions about the vehicle's safety features compared to civilian models, pointing out substantial differences that could complicate registration. Additionally, @ToddCorey experiences pause over necessary modifications due to their wheelchair use and the implications for safety, highlighting the complexities associated with adapting the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle showcase a strong appreciation for its presentation and festive theme. @Johnnycab highlighted the lead picture as great, while @onlyhonda4me praised the Christmas spirit conveyed in the images of Hondas under the tree. @99duelly mentioned the excitement around the bids, noting the rapid increase in interest and bids, which adds to the event's festive charm. Many commenters, like @BigT77 and @cmadison, also expressed enthusiasm about the opportunity these vehicles present for gifting, particularly during the holiday season.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the logistics and characteristics of the vehicles. @Krobsklassics, the seller, encouraged potential buyers to ask questions and mentioned the vehicles are available for shipping from Sarasota, FL. @TETEMONKEY showed interest specifically in the Christmas edition and hinted at selling the ATC if successful in purchasing. Commenters like @solidlifters requested further information about the vehicle's condition, such as photos of the front forks, indicating a practical interest in the auction while maintaining a festive context.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some commenters needing clarification about the vehicle's specifications. @fast450f asked whether the tank was original or aftermarket, indicating uncertainty around its authenticity. @solidlifters also pointed out the need for more detail regarding the front forks, referencing potential issues with leak residues. While the overall tone remained positive, these remarks hinted at the cautiousness some bidders may feel regarding the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments celebrate the beauty and performance of the 1966 Lancia Fulvia HF, with @austin_alfa describing it as an impressive build deserving of a new owner. @Martyn10 praises the car’s great condition and expresses a nostalgic desire for another Fulvia Coupe while sharing a fun video from a previous auction. @professorgearhead highlights the Fulvia's remarkable rally history and driving experience, mentioning its comfort and handling capabilities. Several commenters, like @Jaguar3.4 and @Lanciafan, echo similar sentiments, calling it a "beautiful, brilliant car" and a "delightfully fun" classic, respectively. There is also excitement around its rarity, with @professorgearhead noting just how few original models may still exist.
Neutral: Comments from the seller, @johnfw, provide important information about the auction and the vehicle's condition, indicating they have access to the car for additional queries and stating that driving videos might be possible if the weather permits. Discussions around the Fulvia also include technical details, such as the wheels being cream instead of white as initially suggested, and the presence of glass instead of expected plexiglass windows. Questions about the car's history, documents from the previous auction, and inquiries regarding potential modifications are also raised, suggesting a thorough knowledge and interest in the vehicle's background among bidders.
Negative: Despite the praise, some concerns appear in the comments, particularly about the car's past auctions and possible regrets regarding pricing, stated by @bmarler. Furthermore, a few commenters, like @HFguy, question how well-known the Fulvia is in the U.S. market, speculating that many prospective buyers might overlook it. @CasoliGT64 asks about rust and structural integrity, indicating potential worries about its physical condition, despite @johnfw reassuring there’s no visible structural rust. Comments regarding the differences in window materials and whether these modifications affect the vehicle's value reveal anxieties among bidders about the authenticity and historical accuracy of this classic car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Swingandamiss commented that the vehicle is a lovely example, indicating a favorable impression. @ram_g noted that despite the tilted tachometer, which is common among R129s, the car seems to be a decent example overall, expressing appreciation for the aftermarket wheels. @dpblues2000 (The Seller) highlighted efforts to communicate with potential buyers, stating that a soft top operation video had been added to respond to inquiries, further showing a proactive approach to engaging with interested parties.
Neutral: @rqfnyc requested information on the date codes of the tires, implying a concern for the vehicle's condition that is neither overtly critical nor positive. @Bunta_Garage inquired about the rear seat options available for the R129, showing curiosity while maintaining a neutral stance. @OT1000 asked for clarification on the suspension, signaling a non-judgmental interest in the specifics of the car's features.
Negative: @ram_g mentioned that the tachometer tilt was noticeable and not as common in other R129s, although they still appeared open to the car's overall condition. @EasyBailer highlighted potential concerns regarding the hydraulic cylinders for the top and requested evidence of replacement to ensure reliability. @onebadrover expressed concerns about various operational aspects of the vehicle, including electrical functions in the seats, power windows, and HVAC systems, indicating a cautious and skeptical view of the car's functionality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @timandsons describes the vehicle's color, 'Chaste White,' as a humorous name for a 'monster' of a car that is thrilling yet intimidating to drive. @jawnnewb appreciates the white exterior paired with a black interior as an exceptional color combination for the FD, deeming it a great candidate for someone willing to give it some attention. @SterlingM (The Seller) explains that the car has been lightly used, with regular maintenance performed over its lifetime, such as a recent fluid flush and compression test that yielded good results, making it an appealing option for potential buyers.
Neutral: Commentators discuss the rarity and desirability of the car's specifications, with @08LCI6SMTA43 noting its manual transmission as especially difficult to find. @WildBillMassey and @WesternRedCedar both offer insights into the vehicle's market value, suggesting it could exceed initial reserve expectations based on previous sales. The discussion also touches on the car's cosmetic condition, with varying opinions on necessary cosmetic repairs but overall high praise for its maintenance and condition.
Negative: Critiques of the listing mainly address the lack of clarity in the compression test results, with @WildBillMassey urging for a more comprehensive test to assure buyers. @BFY_TACO and @Habu2 comment on the poor quality of the listing photos, suggesting they do not do justice to the car's aesthetic appeal. @Mazdadan shares concerns about the vehicle's long-term condition due to the age of rubber components, and @93FDguy expresses skepticism about the number of registered FDs, citing personal experiences with poorly maintained examples in the market.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received positive remarks about its aesthetic appeal, particularly the lovely leather dash, described by @smb127 as looking great. @Craven mentions its cartoonishly adorable features, and @RobertfromTX calls it a lovely little car. @boffin5 (The Seller) emphasizes that the Figaro starts easily and pulls strong, indicating it's ready to drive with some minor attention. A potential buyer was pleased after a test drive, suggesting the car has a lot going for it and deserves the fun that comes with ownership.
Neutral: Comments provide a mix of factual information and clarifications about the Figaro's production history. @Just_me notes that Figaros were only produced in 1991, while @jlmmns clarifies that some were titled as 1992. There are queries about specific issues, such as paint fading and engine performance, with @vonscorpio raising concerns about the rear right panel's condition, prompting a response from @raykosh regarding previous repairs made to the engine, including sticking valves.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the car's mechanical condition. @artyc264 highlights troubling issues such as sticking valves, low compression, and an unstable idle, indicating it requires considerable work. @raykosh questions the conflicting information regarding the repairs, suggesting doubts about the car's current engine condition. Additionally, there are requests for a cold start video from @jsully14 and @raykosh, showing some skepticism about the seller's claims and the car's readiness for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Motordad8 shares his fond memories of the SuperHawk, describing it as a fun, torquey bike that's easy to wheelie, emphasizing its awesome sound with an open exhaust. @rofandofy praises Honda for its reliability and quality, noting the amazing torque and lightweight design, making it a joy to ride. He mentions that if he didn't already own one, he would buy this low-mileage bike. @wagongeek highlights the bike's originality and its intact features, conveying a sense of nostalgia for the Honda VTR1000 SuperHawk as an enjoyable and thrilling ride.
Neutral: @johncfarrisjr (The Seller) clarifies the condition of the fuel tank, stating it is pristine and has always been properly stored. He explains the reason for selling as part of his cycling collection rotation and notes that he has a couple of new bikes in mind. @Joexray77 remarks on the bike's nice example she saw at an auction and @Closed_Casket provides insights regarding tire date codes, confirming that the original tires still on the bike will need to be replaced due to their age.
Negative: @ripper996 questions @johncfarrisjr's motivations for reselling the bike, suggesting it may be for profit. @Closed_Casket points out that the posted pictures do not show accurate date codes on the tires, emphasizing the need for clarity in confirming their condition. Another concern arises from @Closed_Casket's comment that both tires will need to be replaced based solely on their age, potentially impacting the bike's readiness for immediate use.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @CRUSH shared a personal experience, stating that his son's Mini Clubman performed reliably, having run strong even with 165,000 miles on it. @StephflixandChill praised their 2012 JCW model in a striking color that garners attention, while @702e30girl described the vehicle as enjoyable to drive, highlighting its practicality and spacious cargo area, as well as the convenience of the club door for family use. @CooperGirl reflected on the fun she experienced with her previous Clubman and expressed confidence in the driving enjoyment that comes with these models, noting their capability on the track.
Neutral: @911r (The Seller) introduced the vehicle as part of a rare auction for a Mini Clubman JCW in a manual transmission, boasting meticulous maintenance from the previous owner. @Zapata mentioned the high specifications of this particular JCW model, particularly its luxurious leather and suede dash, while @RodneyinTN raised inquiries about any modifications made to the car. @Longlivethestick clarified that the car features stock JCW components, dispelling rumors of extensive modifications.
Negative: @roetjen expressed concerns regarding potential high-cost issues related to the engine's turbo and head gasket, questioning if those had been addressed or were pending for a future owner. @mphjr raised a point about the timing chain's replacement, commonly noted as a major concern for the engine model. Overall, while there were substantial praises, the discussions also highlighted necessary caution regarding maintenance aspects.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @tmc_61 shares a personal experience with the vehicle, mentioning it delivers a good driving experience with plenty of power. The comment underscores a sense of enjoyment, highlighting that despite not driving it much, there is no reason for dissatisfaction with the car itself.
Neutral: @Augustaken269, the seller, provides updates about the vehicle's condition, stating the air conditioning works well and confirming that the tires were replaced in 2022. This information is helpful for potential buyers looking for maintenance details.
Negative: While there aren't any explicitly negative comments, @tmc_61 expresses a sense of regret about not receiving a Corvette instead, suggesting some disappointment in the car choice, albeit it does not detract from their appreciation of the vehicle's performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters praised the driving video associated with the vehicle, with @gb70 noting it was one of the best they had seen on the platform, while @buktseat expressed that it made him want to buy the car. The seller, @gtautolounge, also engaged positively with the comments, affirming the enjoyment of driving the Challenger and providing details that the car is all stock, which added to the authenticity of the auction. @ghoti1776 shared their excitement for the car, urging potential buyers to consider it due to their own positive experience with a similar model, further emphasizing the appeal of the Challenger's manual transmission and unique color.
Neutral: The seller provided regular updates throughout the auction period, even wishing the bidders a good weekend or starting their week with a new video. They communicated directly with various potential buyers, answering specific inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and condition, such as exhaust modifications and structural integrity. @Sue2024 requested additional images of the vehicle's front suspension to assess possible rust issues, while @Bbreen5295 sought a condition rating on a scale of 1 to 10 for the car's exterior and interior.
Negative: Some comments indicated curiosity about potential issues with the vehicle, such as @redboots and @buktseat questioning whether the exhaust had been modified since their own experiences with similar cars differed. Additionally, @Sue2024's concern about rust on a low-mileage Challenger prompted @5.0THIS to question the reasoning behind such concerns, suggesting skepticism about the condition of newer models in general. Overall, while there were doubts and questions about specific aspects of the vehicle, it did not seem to significantly deter the interest in the auction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive features and condition. @Driver82 pointed out the correction in the fit around the headlamps as a noteworthy improvement, while @Kimalden praised its originality and predicted strong future value, emphasizing its rarity as a first-year model. @9literviper expressed a deep appreciation for the car's uniqueness, calling it their favorite in their collection, and @Mrslate suggested adding more photos to showcase the vehicle's appeal further.
Neutral: There were inquiries regarding the preservation and refinishing of the vehicle's interior. @VJV raised questions about the refinishing process, prompting responses from @mikein805 who defended the car's interior as primarily cleaned rather than completely refinished. @cincycarbarn and @ACRSNK also engaged in discussion about the refinishing methods, suggesting a desire for more information on maintaining originality in classic vehicles like this one.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism about the vehicle's value and overall presentation. @jeepmike predicted that the seller would struggle to regain their investment based on past sales of similar models. @VJV questioned the inconsistencies in the interior description, while @ACRSNK criticized the refinishing, suggesting it detracted from the car's original charm. Overall, there were concerns about how refinishing had affected the car's marketability, evident in @1Cobra1's call for someone to actually drive the car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed high praise for the vehicle, with @Sedancollector remarking it's the best color on the best Corvette, calling it stunning. @BarryG911 conveyed admiration, stating if money and space were not an issue, this would be his next car, labeling it simply gorgeous. @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 shared a personal dilemma between favorite colors, mentioning both Crystal Red and bright Red, expressing that maybe having both would suffice. Further discussion included comments like @Projectopel calling it a beautiful car, while @YunGun noted the car is beautiful enough to draw them back just to admire the pictures.
Neutral: Details surrounding the vehicle were discussed amongst various users, including the delivery information and technical specifications shared by @newcarpro. A comment on the wheels was made by @newcarpro, noting they are chrome aluminum. Additionally, @Gbell13909 provided insightful responses regarding the vehicle's stickers, clarifying their significance and connection to the original owner. The exchange of practical information between prospective buyers was evident in discussions including whether the seller could show the car in person.
Negative: There were minimal negative comments, mostly inquiries that hint at potential concerns. @derekmurr asked about the stickers' significance on the car, which might indicate curiosity about their value or impact. @Zoomzoom1026 inquired whether there was protective film on the paint, expressing worry about potential damage without such coverage. Additionally, @Bwcochran777 requested the original window sticker, suggesting some buyers might be cautious about the vehicle's documentation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @shashi27 believes this car is perfect for @DougDemuro, highlighting its appeal. @Wolfenhaus admires it as one of the coolest cars ever made, contributing to its positive image. @928s4s agrees, noting the car looks like a nice example, potentially the best color for an Esprit, and wishes good luck with the sale. @ConroyClassics (The Seller) expresses appreciation for the positive feedback, sharing a fondness for the yellow Esprit.
Neutral: @sangelescu raises questions about the missing roof panels, which prompts responses from @ConroyClassics (The Seller) confirming that both the metal and glass panels are absent, but that a plexiglass panel is included, albeit needing modifications. @JeffC comments on the tail lights, recognizing they are not original but a nice upgrade, while @Lotus38 provides insight into the aftermarket components, indicating they are reversible despite being less visually appealing than the OEM versions. Mentions of the roof panel's installation and the car's overall functionality arise, with suggestions for additional pictures and videos for potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the overall admiration, some comments express concern about the car’s parts and condition. @CrabWind criticizes the steering wheel, indicating it's cheap and out of place, and @intrepid1 notes that it actually belongs to a Pontiac Firebird. @Thailand lists various issues, such as damage to the lift points and rough airbags, and questions the integrity of certain aesthetic elements like the tail light color. Moreover, @SILVERSILK mentions that both the exhaust pipes and some tail light modifications detract from the model's originality, contributing to a mixed perception of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ClkJeff (The Seller) has provided a lot of valuable information about the vehicle, emphasizing its excellent condition. He notes that the car is super clean, with no signs of rust anywhere. He mentions that he has only driven the car 3,000 miles since purchasing it and assures potential buyers that the timing chain has not been an issue, stating that the car drives perfectly. Additionally, @LNtoast praises the car for being a wonderful example, further reinforcing the positive feedback surrounding its condition.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Mattbopga and @shoggy1970, have asked questions about the vehicle's features and service history. @romworks was interested in undercarriage pictures, a request that @ClkJeff (The Seller) addressed by providing a link to photos. @young308 sought clarification about service records and any electronic issues, and @hmg9194 inquired about the vehicle's keys and authenticity of the wheels. Overall, the comments reflect a keen interest in the car's well-maintained status while participants actively seek more information before making a potential purchase.
Negative: There do not appear to be any outright negative comments or concerns raised about the vehicle. Although there are inquiries regarding specific features and potential issues, the responses from @ClkJeff (The Seller) have been reassuring and informative, indicating that the car has been well cared for. Commenters like @Mattbopga expressed minor apprehensions about the timing chain but received satisfactory answers that alleviated those concerns.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several users praised the car for its stunning appearance and unique features such as the absence of side pipes and roll bars, which they found appealing. @cb65 described it as the "perfect Cobra" with a beautiful stance and proportions, while @brutaltruth expressed admiration for its looks, calling it "a beautiful car." @sgmoran and @jmbautosports remarked on its classy design elements, and @strayconvert complimented @aleccartio on the impressive presentation video, acknowledging the vehicle's allure and favorable characteristics.
Neutral: Comments also shed light on practical aspects and specific inquiries about the vehicle. @chuck417 raised questions about the drivetrain and the lack of documented engine performance data, highlighting the importance of transparency for potential bidders. @cobraschnitz and @TheGuesser discussed design preferences, specifically regarding the rectangular taillights and their historical significance, while @ntbd4 shared thoughts on the aesthetics of the tail lights, indicating mixed feelings within the community about design choices.
Negative: On the downside, some users pointed out concerns about the car's condition. @badbirdws6 mentioned potential chips in the paint, while others discussed sounds and vibrations apparent in videos of the engine running. @steve_1945 raised concerns about possible fluid leaks, and @Calif-Boss302 questioned a grinding noise that was audible in the presentation video. These comments reflect a cautious sentiment among prospective buyers who are scrutinizing every detail before consideration.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received positive comments regarding its condition and overall appeal. @TheMotorCurator (The Seller) describes it as a 'great defender example' that 'drives very well' and is fully ready to be enjoyed by its next owner. Additionally, the seller highlights the extensive work done on the car, including an overhauled engine and a new Ashcroft transfer box, indicating that it has been well-maintained. @WAGONBOYTD describes the vehicle as a 'nice looking 110', appreciating its aesthetic.
Neutral: There are various inquiries about the vehicle's features and usage. @Mcgregor55 requests a Cold Start and road test video to see the vehicle's condition, including under the mats. @Soelch points out an observation regarding the speed conversion from kilometers to miles, and other commenters, including @Wiggleattack and @scbarr, ask about the vehicle's driving capabilities at freeway speeds. The seller provides details about the toggle switches, further encouraging engagement from potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects, some comments raise concerns regarding the absence of air conditioning, particularly from those in warmer climates like @AnyOldIron and @XavierM, questioning how this affects usability in places like Miami. @Pacwest explicitly asks about the climate controls, revealing a concern about whether the vehicle can address heat issues without AC. Overall, the lack of air conditioning appears to be a notable drawback for some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @AcornMustang mentions that the vehicle looks like a good starting point despite needing some sorting. @Chefgordiemac sees it as a great basis for a mid-year Corvette and wishes good luck with the auction. @GBRBiLL notes it as a nice looking car that requires some TLC, which aligns with the expectations set by the pictures and previous comments.
Neutral: @JohnF1966 provides a historical perspective, comparing the vehicle's condition to well-used Corvettes from the past. @1buddyc raises specific questions about the condition of the paint bubbles and whether a spare tire carrier is included. @90sundevil inquires about what works and what doesn’t and what might be missing from the car, seeking clarity on its overall functionality.
Negative: @sleepchamber questions the condition of the fiberglass around the cowl, while @alyron finds the car somewhat rough, given its refurbishment date of 2025. @Jaybird248 spots a crack in the windshield, and @gembeau notes the absence of the emergency brake handle and spare tire carrier. Further, @Wildbunch criticizes the seller for being vague and mysterious, indicating a lack of transparency.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many users praised the Superformance S-1 for its impressive fit and finish compared to other Seven replicas. @cwood133 expressed fond memories of owning a similar car, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and fun factor, suggesting that there is no better value for money in the market. User @Kromkreb complemented the detailed interior and noted that the car offers a more comfortable ride compared to traditional Seven models, making it more appealing for diverse drivers. @OlympiaVintage also shared a positive experience, remarking on the phenomenal handling and acceleration, emphasizing the joy of owning such a sporty vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments acknowledged the unique characteristics of the Superformance S-1 compared to other Sevens. @JustJed asked about the car's legality and whether it could be driven with just the doors, while many others inquired about the interior space and overall dimensions compared to competitors. User @Cclassic noted that the driving experience is best enjoyed in short bursts on twisty roads, highlighting the car's thrill while acknowledging challenges in accumulating high mileage due to its design and intended use.
Negative: On the downside, some users shared concerns about the vehicle's functionality and performance. @avoidablecontact raised serious issues regarding the car's durability, including structural failures experienced during track use, and suggested that prospective buyers should be cautious about potential underlying problems. The user noted common issues with electronics and components, emphasizing that regular maintenance was essential for safe operation. @KantDrive554U questioned the condition of older components and called for thorough inspections, while @StLDave reflected on the car's suitability as a fun weekend vehicle rather than a race-ready contender.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's design and capabilities. @heywood called the build 'super cool' and appreciated the truck's unique bed design. @texasjet79 was impressed by the truck's performance, specifically mentioning a 'massive jump' it was capable of. @Jon_H praised the quality of work done by Basil's Garage, the shop responsible for building the truck, affirming that they use top-notch parts that enhance durability and functionality. @Motor_Away considered it one of the coolest rigs seen recently and noted the impressive factory options available for the current Ranger model, highlighting its appeal to enthusiasts.
Neutral: The seller, @Jgallo83, provided detailed responses to inquiries about the vehicle, clarifying that no paint work had been done and that all functions were operational, including the fog lights, which were on a separate switch. He also explained the truck's features, such as the water storage tank's location and capacity, along with the new suspension setup designed for heavy loads, which adds to the vehicle's versatility. @97nasd90's questions regarding the flatbed and potential camping options were met with thoughtful responses, including insights about the suspension's capabilities and the weight of the flatbed.
Negative: While there were few outright negative comments, some concerns were raised about specific features of the truck. @badger707 inquired if any bodywork had been done and if there were any non-functional elements, suggesting a worry about the vehicle's condition. There was also a discussion about the viability of using the truck with a flatbed for camping purposes, indicating some uncertainty about payload capacity and functionality. Furthermore, @97nasd90 noted that he preferred the size of this truck over larger models, which reflects a potential limitation for some buyers seeking more payload options.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 expresses excitement about the opportunity to restore the vehicle, referring to it as a beauty that can be brought back to its full potential. @RV9A shares optimism about seeing the Ghia back on the road, suggesting that it can either be taken down to bare metal or put together as a decent driver. @Danielcoile (The Seller) indicates that the Ghia has solid components and parts, with a good engine that previously ran well, and it includes many new parts and hardware to facilitate restoration.
Neutral: @moonbeam996GT3 raises important questions regarding the vehicle's electrical system and engine history, noting the potential for a conversion from 6V to 12V. The seller confirms that the car has a late model 12V engine and acknowledges some updates to the engine and parts, while clarifying details about the car's past ownership and storage conditions. @fyrefast and @pistonboy request additional information and visuals about the car's condition and title, indicating interest in specific details relevant to a potential purchase.
Negative: @kingkarmann points out various issues with the car's bodywork, suggesting substandard repairs and noting the deletion of torsion bar access covers, which may imply poor restoration practices. @kingkarmann also indicates concern about the aesthetic and functional integrity of the vehicle, cautioning future owners about the quality of previous work. The seller, @Danielcoile (The Seller), acknowledges the raised concerns but maintains a positive outlook towards the car's potential, suggesting it serves as a blank canvas for future restoration.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @VantageAuto (The Seller) highlights that the vehicle has been thoroughly maintained with recent repairs, including a replacement transmission and other components, which are known common issues for the model. The seller expresses confidence in the quality of the work carried out, emphasizing that the replacement units are significantly better than the original ones. They reassure potential buyers with the option of extending warranties that offer nationwide coverage, further enhancing the vehicle's appeal. The seller describes the car as exceptional, indicating their belief in the vehicle's value and performance.
Neutral: @427ls7 inquires about the condition of the vehicle, specifically asking if there are any smoke odors and looking for more details about the transmission replacement. @Lauhoffm joins in asking about the warranty situation for the transmission and whether a Mercedes dealership performed the swap. These questions indicate a general interest in the vehicle's maintenance history and current condition without displaying strong opinions either way.
Negative: There are no negative comments provided in this set of interactions, indicating that the overall sentiment surrounding the vehicle is positive, with no reported issues or complaints mentioned by any of the commenters.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments praise the vehicle for its aesthetic appeal and price, with @SoulMan noting it as a 'looker' and a great deal. Additionally, @classics199 provides detailed information about the car's features, stating that it comes with two keys, has no operational issues with the top, and there are no leaks. The air conditioning is noted to blow cold, and the absence of a check engine light is reassuring to potential buyers.
Neutral: Commenters seek additional information about the car, including service records, the condition of the tires, and the status of the air-oil separator @jamesashcroft and @caymanandwent pose these questions. @jettjasper inquires about shipping options to Los Angeles, and @classics199 responds positively, offering assistance with coordination or temporary tags.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about the vehicle's wear, particularly regarding the climate adjustment switches mentioned by @neilpierson25. He expresses skepticism about the visible wear and raises the practicality of maintaining a black exterior in terms of cleanliness. @Spokayman further discusses the challenges of owning a black convertible, hinting at potential drawbacks despite the car's visual appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commentators found the vehicle engaging, highlighting its potential as a unique and fun driving experience. @Diesel_Bob described it as a "cool little race car," while @68Vet shared excitement for the joy of driving with the wind in their hair, appreciating the car's essence. @Duncan_same_old reminisced about racing against the vehicle and acknowledged its builder's competence, further suggesting the car's quality by referencing the builder's distinguished background. @JTasher421 also expressed admiration, stating it was a "brilliant car" and anticipating the fun it surely provides.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification about the car's specifications and history, reflecting a cautious curiosity among potential buyers. @Knuckles-R-Busted inquired about the various titles associated with the vehicle, expressing concern that they could complicate ownership. @Rick47, the previous owner, offered insights into the car's background, emphasizing the solidness of the vehicle and its performance potential. @OldYogi asked for specific measurements to better understand the fit of the Devin body, indicating the technical interest in the car's design.
Negative: Some comments pointed out potential drawbacks related to the vehicle, particularly regarding its condition. @clr1971 emphasized that the car is in dire need of a paint job, while @AliceAustin noted the peculiarities in the video, pointing out that the car seemed to be shown as a mirror image which created confusion. Others questioned the technical aspects of its components, like the engine and parts sourced from other models, leading to skepticism about its performance capabilities. @outpostbob also expressed concerns about how the car's weight and engine tune compared to other performance vehicles, suggesting that while fun, the car might have competitive limitations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @BigT77 expresses appreciation for the excitement around owning multiple Buells, emphasizing that sometimes one isn't enough. @JAY-Z highlights the greatness of these motorcycles, mentioning the challenges Harley faces in marketing them but still recognizing them as excellent riding bikes. @BubbaGPZ1100 reminisces fondly about their own experience with a Buell Cyclone M2, praising its fun ride and torque, and suggests these motorcycles are becoming collectible, sharing their regret of having to part with it. @longlostczech shares their positive experience with a fuel-injected model, noting its fun, reliable performance and economical fuel consumption, asserting that the buyer of these bikes won't regret their investment based on the rarity of unmodified models.
Neutral: @tim54575 (The Seller) expresses gratitude for the comments and bids, showing engagement with potential buyers without providing specific details about the motorcycles' conditions at this time. @singlespeed suggests that these bikes could make a great winter project and are appropriate for antique tags, indicating a practical use for the motorcycles. @AbsoluteGarage asks for more specific information about the bikes, particularly electrical issues, while still expressing enthusiasm for owning Buell motorcycles and their own collection.
Negative: @Moto_Racer raises concerns about the necessary repairs, indicating a need for clarity on the condition of the project bikes. @AbsoluteGarage also seeks additional information about the electrical problems, pointing out potential issues that future buyers should be aware of. These inquiries suggest an underlying concern regarding the maintenance and reliability of the motorcycles being sold, hinting that not all buyers may feel confident without comprehensive details.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the car's stunning color and design. @Gord6 mentioned their love for the vehicle's colors and design, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. Additionally, @P0rsche956 described the car as stunning and rare, suggesting it is worth collecting and would garner significant attention at events. @Owen714 echoed this sentiment, praising the gorgeous color and referencing its historical significance as a 1958 original.
Neutral: There were several queries regarding the car's condition and technical aspects. @Bosticsic raised concerns regarding the AC system, asking why the belt was removed and about potential issues that might exist. @gocorcoran provided insights into the AC, suggesting it was dealer-installed or aftermarket and noted specifics about the evaporator's location. Comments also included requests for more pictures and details about the car's interior and previous maintenance.
Negative: Some comments pointed to concerns regarding the car that potential buyers should consider. @Bosticsic asked about rust issues, indicating a need for clarification about the car's condition, while @Hvacviper94 inquired whether the car had ever been repainted, implying a need for transparency about its history. @gocorcoran noted that the customization of the taillights raised questions, as they were not OEM, which could detract from the car’s authenticity in the eyes of some buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors have expressed enthusiasm about the truck, with @Eclipse123 calling it an "awesome truck!" This general positivity contributes to an encouraging perspective on the vehicle's appeal and condition.
Neutral: Several comments include useful information about the truck's features and maintainability. @CajunHO noted the vinyl seat surfaces and questioned the trim level, suggesting it appears to be a WT model. The seller, @DamonEmily, confirmed various features, including the truck having a trailer brake controller and indicated that it was fleet maintained, which adds to its credibility. Additionally, @Lurvey inquired about its roadworthiness, and @DamonEmily assured that it is capable of driving to the east coast and back, reinforcing the vehicle's functional qualities.
Negative: There weren't significant negative comments regarding the truck, although @CajunHO's inquiry about the trim level may suggest a concern about the truck's specifications, particularly with the indication that it features vinyl over leather and the absence of carpet and manual windows. Overall, the feedback remains predominantly positive and informative.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Cheth20 expresses excitement about the BMW Z4 M, calling it a dream car. @Progressivemtrs (The Seller) highlights the coupe's impressive history with only one owner, no accidents, and comprehensive service records. The seller emphasizes that the car drives exceptionally well and has undergone recent maintenance, including new tires and an oil service, ensuring it's in great shape for prospective buyers. @Crovet concurs about the value of the vehicle, praising its S54 engine and overall driving experience. @Cds4850 points out the appealing specifications of the car, mentioning its great mileage and attractive Imola red color.
Neutral: Some comments reflect a need for more technical information regarding the car's servicing and condition. @2008bimmerM3 inquires about specific services like rod bearings and vanos. @RustyTruck discusses oil change intervals, noting a significant gap in some, which raises questions about the car's maintenance history. Others like @jkkerouac appreciate the aesthetic elements, such as the Imola red leather but express concerns over the seller's responses to maintenance inquiries as being vaguely reassuring. @Progressivemtrs (The Seller) states he respects the community's knowledge and willingness to seek further inspection if needed.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the condition and maintenance of the car. @jkkerouac warns about potential risks associated with the previously mentioned "refurbished" parts, suggesting years of wear could lead to issues. @RustyTruck observes undercarriage corrosion and possible winter driving effects, indicating a potentially detrimental maintenance background. Some community members feel that the seller's dismissive tone towards maintenance inquiries could deter potential bidders. Others, like @SomeScrub, are confused about changing tire types, reiterating concerns over transparency in the car's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle's condition and features. @KWMGGuy reminisced fondly about their experience with a similar model that was enjoyable to drive and reliable, highlighting the efficiency of the car's all-wheel drive in snowy conditions. @NVSVT mentioned their son has a long-standing appreciation for the Jaguar brand and considered this model as a potential option, noting it to be a beautiful car, complementing its mechanics despite minor concerns about fit and finish compared to other models. Additionally, @RWD-FTW humorously noted the shared color between their Jaguar and the one for sale, showcasing a personal connection to the brand.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding the vehicle's specifics, particularly about the undercarriage rust and history of any accidents. @PADude asked for detailed clarifications about corrosion and mechanical needs, while @FarEastGrappler inquired about tire installation assistance post-auction and requested additional pictures of the steering wheel. The seller, @GLCC2017, provided thorough responses about the car's condition, including assurances about its functionality and confirmed that all maintenance records would be available. Furthermore, @Eaauto1 asked about inspection protocols and dealer fees, signaling a demand for transparency regarding the purchase process.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's potential rust and mechanical reliability. @pja1080 pointed out observable rust on the rear crossmember and sought more images to assess the undercarriage. Furthermore, @thomthom questioned the status of the clutch, indicating apprehension about whether it had been replaced. @NVSVT shared a cautionary tale about their son's experience with similar models in slippery conditions, warning that the AWD system may not be ideal for winter driving. Overall, while the vehicle garnered positive attention, there were evident worries about rust and specific mechanical components.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Rianf1 expressed admiration for the vehicle's interior, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @Gmmuscleusa agreed, commenting on the desirability of fun, colorful interiors becoming available in affordable cars. @SuydansImports (The Seller) shared that the interior was a significant factor in their decision to purchase this Audi S3, indicating a sense of pride in its look. Other users like @bobrk noted the practicality of the vehicle for rural mail delivery, suggesting that it has functional uses beyond aesthetics.
Neutral: @SuydansImports (The Seller) provided detailed information about the vehicle's specifications and its condition, outlining a few areas that require attention, such as the rear wheel speed sensor, fading dash pixels, and interior stains. They clarified that the vehicle runs well, despite its minor issues, and mentioned that it features a U.S. spec engine sourced from a 2001 Audi TT, which adds aftermarket potential for the new owner. Contributors such as @wcoucheron and @Walter_Gomez raised questions regarding smog compliance and headlight suitability for U.S. roads, prompting @SuydansImports (The Seller) to give reassurances about headlight conversion patches.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding rust as highlighted by @Bzvdubb, who noticed rust on the front fenders, and @LittlePooka, who pointed out rust on the rear underside and driveshaft. Both users sought further inspection via videos to assess these issues thoroughly. Additionally, @Walther_Gomez noted problems with the vehicle’s adherence to U.S. standards, questioning its smog compliance due to missing documentation like DOT/EPA stickers. These comments indicate potential barriers for prospective buyers related to vehicle condition and regulatory compliance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Boyhowdee expressed enjoyment of the 2004 FXDWGI, stating it was fun to ride with plenty of power for solo trips on sunny days, and appreciated the traditional Harley chrome. @Ironpope13 (The Seller) mentioned that the bike is a really nice model with only 8250 miles, has been ridden for the last six months with no issues, and has passed the NC state inspection without problems. Comments from @BlackRifle and @RedPhish highlight technical aspects of the bike, reinforcing its appeal to enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Ironpope13 (The Seller) clarified that the cam tensioners are still in place and have been checked with no problems, discussing mileage expectations for those components. @ImTheDoctor raised questions about emissions compliance in California due to potential inspections, to which @KeithRichards provided reassurance based on his own experiences, explaining the process of VIN verification in California.
Negative: @ImTheDoctor expressed concern regarding the bike's street legality in California, particularly about the exhaust system. He conveyed apprehension about how the vehicle might not meet emissions regulations in that state. @ImTheDoctor also inquired about whether the rubber engine mounts were replaced, indicating potential issues could arise if they were worn out, though @Ironpope13 (The Seller) assured that they are not broken and performed well during his rides.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @911r (The Seller) shared an engaging driving video that was well-received by viewers, with @gman111111 expressing that it was great, albeit a bit scary. Other commenters, like @RedArcadia, also enjoyed the video, praising the vibrant visuals of Portland, while @boaboyoz admired the beauty of the 992.1 Carrera 4 coupe in Carrara White Metallic, calling it an exquisite example and giving accolades to @911r for showcasing such a gem.
Neutral: There were several inquiries regarding the vehicle's features. @TooManyPorsches asked about the roof rack provisions, to which @911r replied that the car does not have mounts for roof racks. Similarly, @bc90210 sought details about the seats, and @911r confirmed they are standard leather with perforation and manual adjustments. Additionally, @rituximab requested clarification for the dashboard material and trim, receiving informative responses from @911r that it features standard textured trim and a vinyl dashboard.
Negative: Some comments indicate concerns or questions that reflect what could be perceived as downsides. @Candersoh questioned whether roof rack mounts could be added, suggesting that this might be a limitation for some potential buyers. @bc90210 also expressed interest in any paint protection, leading to @911r acknowledging only a small chip on the hood, while stressing the car's overall condition. This highlights that while the car is in excellent shape, there are minor imperfections that might concern prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @vfnrcc (The Seller) presents a vehicle that showcases quality, uniqueness, and authenticity, catering to car enthusiasts with a trusted background of over 50 years in the automotive industry. @Damoncaravanman praises the powertrain of the Jeep, noting its potential longevity with proper care, and highlights the rarity of such low-mileage models. The enthusiastic comments from @Damoncaravanman about the Jeep's ride quality and capability underline its desirability among buyers.
Neutral: @JColinP inquires about a rust prevention spray on the undercarriage, to which @vfnrcc (The Seller) affirms it was treated by the previous owner. @bargainsearch points out a discrepancy in the listing regarding the seating material, which @bringatrailer acknowledges and corrects. @dodgemahal shows curiosity about the vehicle's previous Marketplace listing price, although this question was originally targeted at another user as clarified later by @dodgemahal himself.
Negative: @Damoncaravanman expresses a desire to see before photos of the vehicle's condition, specifically mentioning concerns about the restoration of the plastics after detailing. @Damoncaravanman doubts the visual authenticity of the current condition, leaving an impression that the detailing might mask inherent age-related issues. Although @vfnrcc (The Seller) provides satisfactory responses regarding the condition and detailing, the interest in pre-detail photos indicates some hesitance about the vehicle's true past.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is presented as a lovely S450 4-MATIC, especially timely for the upcoming winter season. The seller, @WAGroup (The Seller), highlights that the car comes with two sets of wheels and tires, including the original wheels which are described as being in excellent condition with minimal use. This model is well-equipped with numerous conveniences, suggesting it requires nothing other than a new driver. The seller also reassures potential bidders that the car has been well cared for, showing no signs of surface corrosion from winter usage, and encourages happy bidding on this desirable vehicle.
Neutral: Several users inquired about the specifications and features of the vehicle. @Jonesy66 asked about the size of the original rims and expressed that the car would look great with 19” AMG monoblocks. @hanni requested a replicated build sheet or decoded VIN, while @bobinoh wanted confirmation regarding a specific key in the pictures. @MGAus raised a concern about the passenger airbag light being illuminated in a video, prompting the seller to clarify it was only an indication of the passenger airbag status and not an error. Moreover, @bobinoh also confirmed interest in viewing and test-driving the vehicle, which @WAGroup (The Seller) responded positively to, highlighting their availability for potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by potential buyers regarding the condition and functionality of certain aspects of the vehicle. @MGAus specifically pointed out a potential issue with the airbag light, reflecting uncertainty about its meaning. The seller reassured that there were no faults with the vehicle and clarified that the light was simply indicating that the passenger airbag was turned off. However, this kind of inquiry may cause hesitation among potential buyers who might perceive it as a lack of clarity about the car's functionality. Overall, while the vehicle is well-received, these questions indicate a level of scrutiny that could deter less knowledgeable buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @dhoeger has always liked the color of the vehicle, highlighting it as a positive aspect. @JAY-Z also appreciates the unique Kalahari beige color with plaid seat inserts, noting how it differentiates the car from many 944s in more common colors. @packardv8 reminisces about owning a similar model and expresses love for the vehicle, and @1CLN93 finds the plaid interior classy and unique, indicating it would be appealing for someone looking for a standout 944.
Neutral: Various commenters have posed questions about specific aspects of the car's condition, such as @MrFrzZ inquiring about potential oil leaks and engine issues, as well as the state of the shift boot. In response, @DaveV87 (The Seller) assured that the car runs well without leaks and that the shift boot's parts are being replaced. Questions about the original radio head unit were raised by @Rod.Lancaster, and @Jonfrancis queried about fitting a new A/C compressor, with @DaveV87 clarifying that the car’s current system is intact but may require significant parts for full HVAC functionality.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the car's body alignment and structural integrity, particularly by @Spokayman, who noted misalignment with the driver's side front fender and questioned whether the unibody was still compromised. @Lakeview noted a missing bolt and queried about the absence of the sway bar. Although @DaveV87 responded by clarifying that the frames remain straight and that missing parts would be provided, the ongoing concerns about bodywork and potential misalignment persisted in the comments, casting doubt on its overall condition.
![]() |
One-Family-Owned 22k-Mile 2001 Ford Mustang Bullitt GT 5-Speed
1FAFP42X21F238184
Lot 222996
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the low mileage of the vehicle, emphasizing that with only 22,000 miles, it still runs like new. @Fordfirst remarked that it's a great Bullitt from SE with no rusty panels, indicating it is well-preserved. Others, like @Summerlyn, expressed admiration for the car's beauty and potential as a great collector's item. The seller, @Silver_Bullitt, defended modifications like the wrap and spoiler, asserting that they enhance the vehicle's appeal, and emphasized the car's value despite some criticisms.
Neutral: Several discussions revolved around the vehicle's authenticity as a Bullitt model, with mixed opinions on the added spoiler and wrap. @dougl33 initially questioned the authenticity regarding the modifications, while @btocco13 noted that the wrap was likely a personal choice that altered the iconic look. @rcollari66 commented on the presence of genuine Bullitt-specific items, highlighting a mixture of enthusiasm and skepticism about the car's condition versus its mileage, suggesting that some features appear worn for such low usage.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's modifications, with @BillyBaldone noting that the added spoiler detracted from the original design, and other users, like @Picky1, suggested removing the wrap to maximize its value. @mfarrington001 also inquired about the paint condition before the wrap and indicated that the paint had previously been peeling, which worried potential buyers. Furthermore, @dougl33 and others requested clearer images to confirm the Bullitt number's authenticity, reflecting skepticism about the modifications and their impact on the car's overall integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Niteroi expresses admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic in red, suggesting it looks attractive. @brighton_corgi agrees, indicating it seems like a luxury vehicle suited for affluent individuals. @Slam105 humorously likens it to a 'Command Car', while @dmarti02 highlights the rarity of finding an early Green Label in such good condition. @benzjag emphasizes the Green Label's desirability and reliability, suggesting this specific model has been well-maintained. @Fleche_dOr calls the Arnage a "Proper Motor Car" and suggests it's a smart choice for buyers. @MR67 shares a positive perspective on the Green Label, praising its performance and cost-effectiveness compared to older models.
Neutral: @OWLBYRD raises questions about service records and general condition, while @Vogelsang checks on potential error codes. @nlm328 (The Seller) responds to inquiries by confirming no error codes exist and stating that everything in the car works. The seller mentions the car has been primarily used for pleasure driving over 21 years. @TERRYM questions the condition, but @nlm328 (The Seller) clarifies there are minor scratches typical of a car of that age, attributing them to close proximity to objects in a garage. The seller also responds to inquiries about maintenance, stating they have kept the car well maintained, though unsure about certain specifics like tire age.
Negative: @Royall66 and @TERRYM both mention that the car seems rough for its mileage, noting visible blemishes and potential repair costs. @WJK points to concerns about the condition of original parts like tires and spark plugs, indicating they may not have been replaced. @benzjag mentions critical design issues with later models, warning potential buyers of the high repair costs associated with head gasket failures. @JBFla highlights the risk of poorly serviced earlier models, suggesting that without good maintenance, the costs to restore them can escalate. Overall, some comments express skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition despite its appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Overall, the comments regarding the 2003 Volkswagen Eurovan Westfalia MV showcase its appeal and quality. @JohnnyNewEngland noted that the van looks clean and well maintained, expressing his positive regard as someone who also owns a Eurovan. @Ntlpie highlighted its beauty and fun factor, recalling their twenty years of experience with a similar model. The seller, @allin938, received praise for the van's fantastic reliability and adventure-ready features, further emphasizing that it was well cared for, with low mileage for its age. Many commenters, including @BostonCarGuy, remarked on the van's rarity and attractiveness compared to typical minivans, noting it as functional and enjoyable to drive.
Neutral: Commenters engaged constructively with questions regarding the van's condition and specifications. @WaldoOC raised a concern about the reputation of Eurovan transmissions and asked whether any modifications had been made to enhance reliability. @samglover11 inquired about the timing chain and recent maintenance history. Others, including @1WAGONHO and @ibuprofen, discussed features such as the rear cup holders and curtain mechanism, providing insights into the ease of use and compatibility with replacement parts. The seller, @allin938, actively responded to all inquiries, providing detailed information and reassurances about the van's condition and availability for inspection, which helped maintain a neutral and informative tone throughout the conversation.
Negative: Despite the predominantly positive and neutral feedback, some concerns were expressed about potential issues with the van. @WaldoOC pointed out the weak spot often associated with Eurovan transmissions, prompting inquiries about the history and upgrades related to that area. There were also users like @1WAGONHO who pointed to missing components such as the rear cup holder cover and headrests, implying that the van might require additional attention before purchase. @samglover11's questions about the maintenance record for critical components like the timing chain and transmission fluid indicated a level of caution among prospective bidders, suggesting that while the vehicle appeared desirable, thorough due diligence was necessary.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: There are several positive comments about the vehicle's overall condition, with @RundeepResources (The Seller) noting that the Allroad is in tiptop condition, with all maintenance up to date and major services recently performed. Commenters like @CarpeDMC7 appreciated the improvements in the updated EA888 Gen 2 engine, indicating that it is a solid choice among Audis. Additionally, potential buyers seemed impressed with the car's striking color combination and condition, particularly the interior and exterior features, praising the seller for sharing videos and images to showcase the vehicle accurately.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed a neutral stance regarding certain features and specifications of the vehicle. For instance, @CarpeDMC7 asked for clarification about the engine generation and provided knowledgeable insights about the improvements in the EA888 Gen 2 engine. @RundeepResources (The Seller) reassured buyers that the brake pads and rotors are in excellent condition, with sufficient material remaining for many miles ahead. There were also inquiries about the vehicle's sunroof functionality and the title's unusual fuel source description, which the seller satisfactorily addressed, maintaining transparency with potential buyers.
Negative: Conversely, some negative comments raised concerns about the frequency of oil changes, with @RichDD and @DougFontaine specifically questioning the car's history and whether it may indicate underlying issues like excessive oil consumption. @DougFontaine expressed skepticism over the rationale behind such frequent oil changes, implying a worry that it might suggest future problems. Additionally, @CTT pointed out minor rock chips on the vehicle, indicating potential visual flaws due to the car's mileage, thus sharing apprehension about aesthetic imperfections that may be more pronounced on darker paint jobs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle's build quality and uniqueness. @FirehouseVintage (The Seller) highlights that the truck, originally built to keep up with modern muscle cars, rides on a custom chassis with advanced mechanics, including a 383 stoker engine and modern braking systems. The body retains its original patina, attracting more attention at shows than other fully restored vehicles, suggesting a positive reception from enthusiasts. @tblrock2 acknowledges the impressive build and asks about its features, indicating interest in its function as well.
Neutral: Some comments center around inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and performance capabilities. @GDP comments on the behavior of a previous bidder, indicating general dissatisfaction with the auction process, while @Breezejammer shares a personal desire for this type of truck without expressing strong feelings. @car_collector raises a question about whether the speedometer is functional, which @FirehouseVintage confirms, reflecting a neutral stance on the vehicle's operational aspects.
Negative: A dissatisfaction with the auction process is noted in @GDP's comment regarding the previous bidder who was just 'bidding for fun,' labeling them as unproductive. While this comment does not reflect negatively on the truck itself, it does highlight potential issues with the auction environment. Another subtle negative aspect brought up by @tblrock2 is the lack of images showcasing the door glass, questioning whether the vehicle is meant primarily for fair weather driving, which may hint at concerns about practicality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @wmcnair (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm about the 1978 VW Beetle and invites bidders to ask questions or request additional photos or videos. @timandsons shares fond memories linked to the car, highlighting the joy of owning a Beetle. He elaborates that driving with the top down creates a great experience, reinforcing the car's nostalgic value. @wmcnair responds, acknowledging that many people have personal stories related to Beetles, reinforcing the emotional connection these vehicles foster.
Neutral: @wmcnair (The Seller) clarifies that the previous buyer did not follow through, and he's optimistic about the no-reserve auction leading to someone else enjoying the car. @Qoe1964 raises a question regarding the seller's previous listing and bidding behavior, hinting at potential concerns about the seller's intentions. In response, @wmcnair explains the circumstances and rationale behind relisting the vehicle.
Negative: @IndianRockFarm points out a notable lack of undercarriage photographs despite the abundant pictures available, which suggests a possible oversight in showcasing important details of the car's condition. This raises potential concerns for prospective buyers regarding transparency and the thoroughness of the online listing, highlighting the importance of presenting all angles of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors appreciate the solid front end and the smooth driving experience of the vehicle, as stated by @mosafarini (The Seller) who assured @Deerkiller that there is no death wobble. This highlights the vehicle's good mechanical condition, contributing positively to its overall appeal.
Neutral: There were requests for additional information about the vehicle, with @Uby67vw1958 asking for undercarriage photos and @Deerkiller inquiring about death wobble, which reflects potential buyers' desire for more detailed assurance about the vehicle's condition. @mosafarini (The Seller) responded by promising to provide more photos and videos, thus facilitating communication between the seller and potential buyers.
Negative: No specific negative comments were noted regarding the vehicle itself, but the mention of ongoing blizzard conditions may imply that potential buyers could face difficulties in evaluating the vehicle properly during extreme weather. This could be seen as an inconvenience for interested parties looking to assess the car directly.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @camarolynn describes the vehicle as magnificent, reporting that theirs has reached 140k miles without using any oil, a testament to its reliability. @Profcarnut shares a similar experience, stating that they were so impressed by their first vehicle with 110k miles during a test drive that they purchased another one, highlighting high satisfaction with the car's performance. @acad23 emphasizes that the vehicle brings lots of smiles, suggesting an enjoyable driving experience.
Neutral: @4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) engages with potential buyers by providing additional information and videos about the vehicle. They confirm that all service records are available on Carfax, detailing several maintenance tasks that have been performed, which may reassure buyers about the vehicle's upkeep. @TucsonDave-2 inquires about the reason for selling the vehicle so soon after purchase, indicating interest but also curiosity regarding the seller's motivations.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns and requests for clarification. @jsjodin repeatedly asks about service records and what major services have been done, indicating potential uncertainties regarding the vehicle's maintenance history. Additionally, @ram_g raises questions about the condition of various functions and components of the car, notably asking about the radio, navigation, heating, and visibility of different parts of the vehicle, reflecting a cautious approach from some potential buyers before committing.
![]() |
Mid-Engined, Cadillac V8-Powered 1981 Porsche 911SC Targa
WP0EA0918BS160228
Lot 223030
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @RumbleAuto praised the incredible amount of custom fabrication involved in the vehicle's build, commending the serious commitment required to undertake such a project. @MGB6 expressed a light-hearted curiosity about the modifications, asking why the changes were made. Additionally, @BayportLJ excitedly noted the return of this unique vehicle, while @Charleetuner found humor in its design, celebrating the creativity behind using luggage for engine cover. @Jimshane, both a Porsche and vintage Caddy collector, expressed awe for the build, noting its uniqueness while also being curious about the weight differences involved.
Neutral: Comments regarding the car's overall performance varied; while @JAY-Z inquired about the F/R weight balance, @4040nrd questioned whether there were overheating issues or modifications to the suspension. Observations noted by @dogandponyshow mentioned the car's condition as admirable, despite concerns over how the engine alters the car's balance. @chookasd (The Seller) also made an effort to clarify specifics such as gauge functionality, suggesting that the car operates adequately for a daily driving experience.
Negative: However, not all feedback was positive. Multiple commenters, including @venaGT, remarked on the concept that just because something can be done, doesn't mean it should be. @packardv8 criticized the perception surrounding the Cadillac engine's durability, suggesting that it's an urban legend. @southwind raised questions about the air intake being obstructed by the luggage concealing the engine, while @WishIhad1M issued a strong negative opinion, labeling the vehicle an abomination due to the engine swap and its impact on the car's agility. Concerns about the engine noise and overall health were echoed by @pallen747 and @CORVAIRWILD, both voicing doubts about the vehicle’s reliability and performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Espanolie describes the vehicle as a sleeper muscle car that has been enjoyed and well-maintained, praising its addictive exhaust note and overall condition considering the mileage. @sstripes96, the seller, echoes this sentiment, noting that the car has been a part of their family, consistently receiving compliments during drives. Additionally, @16HWSS comments positively on the vehicle’s impressive interior condition for its age, indicating that it appears well-kept and promising long-term reliability.
Neutral: @sstripes96 provides information about the vehicle's service records, mentioning that they include a detailed Excel spreadsheet of all work done along with factory service manuals. They also respond to inquiries from @zx1100A2 by confirming the car’s exhaust system complies with 50-state emissions standards and assures @newcarpro that the car has been heavily enjoyed as a daily driver before the need for a larger vehicle arose.
Negative: @ycab inquires about any 'bads' associated with the vehicle, implying there may be concerns regarding its condition. @newcarpro and @16HWSS note signs of wear on the seats, which while described as minimal, still indicate some level of usage. Overall, while the vehicle is presented in a positive light by the seller, questions about minor wear and tear suggest some apprehension among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @jsully14 described the vehicle as a "beautiful rig" and appreciated that yellow was the perfect color for the H2. @ArtistFox expressed confidence in the vehicle's longevity, noting that despite having been put to work, it has only 83k miles and minimal corrosion, suggesting it is in good condition. @amotorsports (The Seller) reassured potential buyers by confirming there are no leaks in the leveling system, enhancing trust in the vehicle's reliability.
Neutral: @HerbDaddy inquired about the need for any repairs, asking specifically about check engine lights, cracked leather, and thanking the seller in advance for their response. @PVZ13 requested confirmation that the H2 meets California's 50 state smog compliance, indicating an interest in legal compliance for environmental standards. @Badmoonreizen raised questions about the missing spare tire/carrier and asked about a curved piece of metal on the undercarriage, showing curiosity about the vehicle's overall status and modifications.
Negative: @DKMZ06 made a light-hearted comment suggesting the vehicle "needs a big 3 on the side," possibly referring to an enhancement. @Badmoonreizen's inquiry about the spare tire and the curved metal piece indicates some concern over missing parts or potential issues, hinting at a lack of completeness in the vehicle's presentation. @paramedicsean asked about potential leaks in the leveling system, suggesting apprehension regarding mechanical reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @pplkook expressed that the car looks like a fantastic deal with a lot of potential, while @MikeDatsunR16 also noted its nice appearance with the emphasis on how much work could be put into it for the right price. @19Willys46 and @ghdiscman praised the car's aesthetic, with the latter mentioning the time and expense put into it, indicating a generally positive sentiment towards its appearance and potential value.
Neutral: @Beta55 (The Seller) provided detailed information about the car's condition and components, including the clutch and engine, clarifying that all necessary interior hardware is included for the new installations. @snejad raised questions about the additional interior pieces and coverings, to which @Beta55 confirmed they are all present, and there are no issues with the install process. It was also mentioned that the vehicle is registered in Arizona and complies with registration norms for classic cars.
Negative: On the downside, @mef0629 and @kenlaroe pointed out issues such as the poorly blended paint on the driver’s door and questioned the uniform color of the engine paint, suggesting that modifications may not have been well thought out. @thebenlyshop echoed this sentiment with a humorous critique, indicating these modifications might not positively affect the car's bid amount. Additionally, @snejad noted the absence of original decals and badging, which could detract from the car's overall appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @WishfulThinker23 expressed admiration for the quality of the Bullitt replica, stating that it looks nicely done. @LuckyDawg appreciated the driving video, reminiscing about the excitement of the car, while @Calstickshift noted the potential increase in value due to the color change. @Batman1961 praised it as the nicest Frank Bullitt clone he has seen, highlighting the attention to detail in features like the relocated antenna. The comments from @Dfhodg and @gwn emphasized the quality restoration and the great presentation of the car, which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters shared their thoughts on the car's appearance and potential modifications, allowing for a mix of opinions. @jonmarimba and @Thomas54 suggested specific changes to the stance, while @mblackmd inquired about the damage history and body panel replacements. @ChasinFords remarked on the auction value and paint color debates surrounding the car's restoration. @LittlePieces provided suggestions for missing components, indicating the ongoing conversation about the vehicle's authenticity and details.
Negative: @mblackmd raised concern about the wreck damage, asking for elaboration on repaired panels. @bkrug pointed out floor pan replacements, questioning the extent of the undercarriage work. @NAmanual expressed a desire for the back panel color to match the car, leading to debate among commenters. @Myoldcut jokingly asked about the transmission, questioning the car's authenticity as a replica. Overall, some negative feedback focused on aspects like missing parts and the vehicle's changes from its original version.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as a delightful example of a Bel Air, emphasizing its appealing red and white color scheme. @Shafesrods highlights the car's rarity, noting its original 6-cylinder engine and special Belair trim, which contributes to its unique status among classic cars. Overall, the general sentiment from the commenters is one of admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and heritage.
Neutral: Several comments from @JGSAmcar (The Seller) provide insights into the car's current condition and specifications. They clarify that the transmission operates well, and while the rear axle is assumed to be original, specific details regarding its ratio and posi status remain unknown. Additionally, the seller mentions that while there are some surface rust issues on the rear frame rails, the overall appearance of the car is considered dry and manageable despite the presence of dirt and surface rust.
Negative: @WIZZZZ raises concerns regarding potential back fees and the functionality of various components including the wipers, radio, clock, and heater fan, which are noted as not working. Despite the seller's assurances that the car is in good working order, unanswered questions about some issues leave a slight air of uncertainty about its overall reliability. @willie2323 expresses curiosity regarding the reverse lockout function, reinforcing the focus on the vehicle's operational aspects amidst the otherwise positive aesthetic feedback.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's design and features. @dmnmkmcm5 praised the interior color, while @BSteeleRVA called the two-door Range Rover 'the most sublime of all SUVs' and a true beauty. @martinpaulaG4 referred to the build as intelligent and interesting, comparing it favorably to other iconic cars like the longhood 911. The seller, @shopclubsautogroup, also highlighted the luxurious leather interior and the vehicle's strong visual appeal, noting that everyone who sees it is interested.
Neutral: Several users provided general insights and queries about the vehicle's functionalities. @technom3 inquired about the tailgate's solidity and the AC's performance, expressing genuine interest rather than criticism. Others, such as @David-Aitchison and @JDox2480, asked about the rear seat's capabilities and window handle situation, respectively. @shopclubsautogroup responded to these inquiries, confirming that the rear seats fold down and addressing the window handle issue, showing a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the vehicle's condition. @technom3 pointed out signs of rust on the tailgate, although @shopclubsautogroup refuted this by stating they didn't see any signs of rust. @WAGONBOYTD mentioned the common rust holes in the upper tailgate, implying a need for potential repairs. Additionally, @jimjim asked whether a branded title would complicate registering the vehicle in other states, indicating a level of caution regarding the vehicle's history that could affect buyer interest.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Spokayman appreciates the Metallic Black color of the vehicle, noting its forgiving nature against dust and dirt compared to gloss black, and emphasizes that life's too short for frequent car washes, suggesting that driving should be prioritized instead. @JackVetter shares a positive personal experience with a similar model, suggesting that this particular Porsche is ideal for daily use.
Neutral: @CSmini (The Seller) has been open about the vehicle's servicing history, indicating that all service is current and recalls have been satisfied, with receipts made available for verification. Comments regarding the vehicle's maintenance and overall condition have been addressed, agreeing that the car has a few touch-up chips but maintains good cleanliness overall.
Negative: @TimBuckToo_2 makes a criticism about the presentation of the car, stating that the visible dust and dirt in the photos detracts from its value and suggests that a mobile detailer could have improved its appearance for a reasonable cost. @046spdm inquires about potential rock chips and notes the difficulty in assessing the true condition of the vehicle from the provided photos, reflecting concern over the car's presentation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The overall reception of the truck is quite favorable, with many comments highlighting its unique build and quality. @LongDucDong praised the aesthetics of the truck, noting that it reminded him of when Chevy made attractive trucks. @Mgood2003 (The Seller) emphasized the meticulous attention to detail that went into the modifications, ensuring that top-quality parts were used throughout the build. The seller also assured potential buyers that the truck runs and rides great, making it a standout at any truck show.
Neutral: Some commenters had inquiries about specific features and past conditions of the vehicle. @vette5762 asked about the functionality of the wipers and heating system, which @Mgood2003 confirmed are in working order, although the truck lacks air conditioning. Another person, @Floydcaz, sought clarification on the mileage prior to modifications, and the seller shared that the original dash showed 140k miles but that most parts are new with just 2100 miles on them.
Negative: Despite the positives, there were concerns raised about the truck's modifications, with some commenters noting that the customizations may not appeal to everyone's taste. @vette5762 expressed worry regarding inspection requirements for wipers, while others were curious about the lack of air conditioning. @Mgood2003 made it clear that while he recognizes the truck's unique modifications, he understands it may not fit everyone's preferences and mentioned that he could easily revert some modifications if needed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed positive sentiments towards the vehicle, noting its appealing aesthetics and classic charm. @AugustWest highlighted the E30's looks and suggested enhancements like basket weaves for better enjoyment, while @ChoonHound described it as the quintessential upper-middle-class hot-girl car of the 80s. @MM1313 complimented the car's appearance and inquired about the functionality of the front seats, indicating interest in its comfort and usability.
Neutral: Comments included various clarifications and requests for information about the vehicle's features. @japashby asked for a photo of the emissions sticker, and @genevamotorcars (The Seller) promised to provide it. @Ciscokidridesagain raised a question about the convertible top's mechanism, which @nmoreno0306 clarified, stating that automatic tops were not an option until 1992, aligning with @genevamotorcars' response that the manual top was indeed correct.
Negative: There was some disappointment expressed regarding specific features of the car. For instance, @Scott_S noted that although the car was nice, they wished for a manual transmission ('3rd pedal') which some enthusiasts prefer for the driving experience. The absence of an automatic convertible top was also brought up, with @Ciscokidridesagain implying that its lack could be seen as a drawback, although this point was addressed by @genevamotorcars with a perspective that fewer mechanical features mean less to maintain.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Sascha_trofimov expressed admiration for the vehicle, stating it is gorgeous, which indicates a positive perception of its aesthetic appeal. @vuugti, the seller, proactively engaged with commenters, showcasing a willingness to answer questions and provide clarifications about the bike's features. The overall tone of the seller reflects a commitment to transparency and customer service during the auction process.
Neutral: @S8kencade pointed out inaccuracies regarding the model year, indicating it was imported by Iconic in 2023 and is likely a 2022 production model. @BigT77 and @onlyhonda4me discussed the challenges of registering the bike for street use, indicating that there might be potential solutions. @rkjjeep raised a question about the presence of a kick starter, to which the seller confirmed it was not included, emphasizing a factual approach to the discussion.
Negative: There was some confusion regarding the year of manufacture, with @Skydog highlighting that the listing was updated but questioning why the model year was still unclear, suggesting a lack of thoroughness in the listing process. @rkjjeep suggested that the kick starter detail should be removed from the listing, indicating possible misinformation. The seller's initial mistake in listing the bike as a 2006 model may lead to frustrations among potential buyers seeking clarity on the bike's true specifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the 2024 Porsche 911 Turbo S, particularly praising its striking interior and overall aesthetic. @Joshuaephrem highlighted the beauty of the car's interior, while @ChadGee referred to the specification as beautiful, expressing a strong love for the interior design. @mkxair emphasized the timeless and elegant quality of the interior in such a modern performance vehicle, and @Huxleyhorn appreciated the powerful combination of the wheels and interiors. The responses indicate a shared sentiment of excitement and approval for the car's visual appeal, with @boaboyoz calling it an incredible and stylish specimen.
Neutral: The seller, @nweuro, provided comprehensive details about the car, noting it has been well-maintained with only about 10,000 miles and was unmodified aside from some protective film (PPF). They explained that the interior impresses almost everyone who views it in person, contributing to the car's appeal. Regarding the PPF, there were inquiries from users like @shankdiesel about its extent, prompting the seller to clarify that the full front is covered along with additional areas. The seller also emphasized their experience with Porsche vehicles and their willingness to facilitate inspections to ensure a transparent transaction process for buyers.
Negative: Some comments pointed out certain features that could be perceived as drawbacks. @rbegga questioned the absence of the front axle lift, which several users noted might be essential for navigating steep driveways. @sbaschn mentioned that although the Turbo S includes numerous options, they considered the front axle lift an important feature that was missing. @tomtully provided a technical explanation of how the Turbo S front spoiler functions differently, capitalizing on its design that may not necessitate the front axle lift as much as in other models. Additionally, @Joshuaephrem raised concerns about a potential flaw seen in a photo, questioning whether it was dirt under the PPF, although the seller clarified it was just an artistic shot.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle for its beautiful color and overall appeal. @dobbaker mentioned it as a 'nice ride' while @BigT77 highlighted the great platform and color, expressing regret for selling a similar car. @zdoctor expressed excitement over the color, predicting it would make the next owner smile. @livemeyer noted the rarity of the vehicle if the cassette deck and CD player function, adding to its charm. Additionally, @flavol88 and @Marcher6 shared positive sentiments about the car's condition and desirability.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the technical aspects of the vehicle, with inquiries about the nitrous oxide system, accident history, and maintenance records. @SSJVegita asked for detailed photographs of the pinch welds and the gas tank area, indicating thoroughness in reviewing the vehicle's condition. @Robertsharpe24 (The Seller) provided information about the accident being minor and cosmetic, as well as the nitrous being a 70 horsepower dry kit not used in recent ownership. Questions about the timing belt and maintenance were raised, with some commenters expressing a desire for more driving videos and clarity on servicing history.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the nitrous setup and the lack of documentation for some aspects of the vehicle's service history. @SSJVegita and @Zexpert questioned whether the nitrous was necessary if it wasn't being used and why modifications like mounts had been made, expressing cautious interest. There were also comments about the exhaust pipes not being aligned properly, hinting it could be a result of the reported accident. @joeyp12's request for timing belt documentation pointed out the uncertainty around the vehicle's maintenance, leading to speculation about future costs for prospective buyers.
![]() |
513-Mile 2021 Land Rover Defender 90 P400 First Edition Undefeated X Galpin
SALEV6RU6M2046760
Lot 223037
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Commentors like @sToNeCLoSeR and @hisstory express enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as a cool build with appealing colors. @2hecknback emphasizes its practicality for outdoor activities like surfing and praises its unique features, suggesting it’s an ideal vehicle for adventurers. They appreciate the nostalgic color choices and the quality of the custom paint job, indicating that it stands out in the competitive market of used cars, calling it both special and cool.
Neutral: Some users raise inquiries about the vehicle's service history and costs associated with ownership. @WAGONBOYTD and @BLZKRG request clarification on the previously paid amount and potential issues with the vehicle's service records. @shadowcreekranch (The Seller) responds with reassurance about recent service and warranty information but also acknowledges the lack of detailed service records, attributing it to the vehicle's storage history prior to sale.
Negative: Dissenting views come from @jdv1745 and @jhorstick, who criticize the aesthetics, comparing the vehicle to a gentrified lawnmower and expressing distaste for the color choices. @Birmingham_dave simply describes the vehicle as gross, while @MX4LIFE laments steep registration fees in California that could dissuade potential buyers. Concerns about the lack of service documentation and transparency are also noted, with @BLZKRG asking for more information on service records and components originally shown in promotional materials.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Theepervette expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle by stating, "Niceeeee!!!" which indicates excitement and a positive perception of its overall appeal. Additionally, @UnplannedTwinDad, the seller, provided informative responses to inquiries, enhancing the vehicle's attractiveness by sharing details about the supercharger pulley size and linking to relevant videos and parts. This level of engagement shows the seller's sincerity in promoting the car's features.
Neutral: @showmx requested clarification regarding the pulley size, reflecting curiosity about the specifications rather than any negative sentiment. @dondeecee inquired about the exhaust loudness compared to stock, which suggests an interest in performance but does not imply dissatisfaction or concern. @TrashPandas asked for details on the clutch brand and condition—a common query for potential buyers seeking transparency in car performance.
Negative: @manwithnoname questioned the vehicle's cleanliness with the comment, "A smokers car?" which casts a potential negative light on its condition. However, @UnplannedTwinDad (The Seller) countered this by affirming the vehicle has never been smoked in, aiming to alleviate any concerns. While @TrashPandas’ inquiry about the clutch could indicate skepticism, the seller's response reassured that the original clutch has had no issues, but it also raises questions about its longevity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Jimbolaiya remarked that this is an almost perfect example of the vehicle. @pocketstime described the car as beautiful, and @DKMZ06 expressed a long-standing desire for a 10th Anniversary RX7, calling it a stunning car that's an engineering marvel. @rrysedorph also praised it as a wonderful example, indicating a strong intent to bid on it. Similarly, @Hippert2457 shared fond memories of the same model, noting its exceptional handling capabilities compared to contemporaries. @7thwonder highlighted its unicorn status and aesthetic appeal, even mentioning that the wear on the driver's seat can be remedied.
Neutral: Excaliburmotorsports (The Seller) provides detailed descriptions of the car's features and history, emphasizing its original condition and low mileage, along with the fact that it was owned by the first owner for many years. They addressed inquiries about the minor rust on certain areas, explaining it as easily fixed surface rust. Additionally, they are open to showing the car in person and actively engage with potential bidders, promising compression and hot start test videos, which demonstrates a commitment to transparency. Several commenters have also inquired about the selling price range, indicating ongoing discussions about potential bids.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's wheels were voiced by @WildBillMassey, @7thwonder, and @boldulysses, who found the mis-installation unacceptable and noted that it detracts from the car's overall presentation. @yma10 inquired about rust issues which some may see as a potential deterrent. Meanwhile, @mazda2924x raised skepticism about the reported compression numbers from the seller, suggesting that they may not be accurate compared to standard testing conditions. Such comments indicate that while the vehicle is largely admired, there are notable apprehensions regarding its condition and the seller's transparency.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the 2007 Honda Civic Type R (FD2), highlighting its unique status as a right-hand-drive, limited production vehicle. @pdahondas88 remarked on the legality of the car's import in the US, indicating its desirability and wishing it could be available sooner. @The_Dude_Abides recounted a thrilling driving experience with the car in Japan, and @onlyhonda4me appreciated the vehicle's legendary 'Championship White' color, suggesting it would fit perfectly in their personal collection. The seller, @ebbymaboi, emphasized the car's excellent condition and its high-revving K20A engine as attractive features, receiving reassurance from bidders about its appeal as a collectible.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the feasibility of importing the vehicle to the US. @ebbymaboi addressed @pdahondas88's questions regarding import regulations, detailing how the car could be imported as a show or race car or potentially preserved until 2032 when it becomes eligible for everyday driving. @spoonek affirmed that it is legal to import, provided it is registered correctly, while @itrdave sought clarification on how it might be successfully transferred to a US owner. Additionally, @gpomp inquired about the car's audio system, indicating a practical interest in its features.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the complexities of importing the vehicle and potential limitations on its use. @stustu questioned the lack of a Japanese Carfax in the auction listing, implying that transparency about the car's history was crucial for potential buyers. This concern was echoed by others inquiring about essential documentation to ensure the vehicle's authenticity and condition. @wowwow also highlighted the practicalities of the transaction, asking about tax implications and delivery timelines, which pointed to the uncertainties faced by prospective buyers.
![]() |
Vern Tardel–Built, 255 Flathead-Powered ’32 Ford Highboy Roadster 3-Speed
1875162
Lot 223134
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received overwhelmingly positive comments, with @V8s_for_life enthusing about the exceptional build quality and craftsmanship led by @GenauAutoWerks, the seller. Commenters like @HotRodRon1932 highlight the rarity and historical significance of a Vern Tardel car, emphasizing that they are often referenced in hot rod building literature. The stunning aesthetics of the car also draw admiration; @TMats describes it as 'simply beautiful,' while @boaboyoz praises it as 'senbloodysational and cool AF,' showcasing a strong appreciation for the car's traditional hot rod appeal. Many commenters express excitement about the build's attention to detail, with @APPLESAUCED_226 noting the insane detail and contemplating daily driving the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments are neutral, primarily focused on inquiries and comments about the vehicle's specifications and features. @ABONeFORDOR asks specific questions about the transmission rebuild and the functionality of the hood vent. @DansDad inquires about the VIN number, suggesting curiosity about the car's authenticity. @Av68 questions the dimensions of the driver in a video, seeking clarity about occupant comfort, while @GenauAutoWerks, the seller, responds to these inquiries with informative answers about the build quality and features. Overall, these comments indicate an interest in the technical aspects of the vehicle without strong emotional connotations.
Negative: A few negative or humorous takes were present, as seen in @pigman’s remark about the glaring error in the vehicle being that it is not theirs. This tongue-in-cheek comment reflects a playful frustration rather than a serious critique. @PSFarm humorously suggests an easy fix for pigman's issue by indicating the bid button. While these comments are not typically constructive and lean more towards jest, they do illustrate the competitive nature of the auction environment where potential buyers express their desire to acquire the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's restoration quality, highlighting it as one of the most beautifully modified TR6s they've seen. @Lifer35 and @mhawkeONT emphasized the stunning decisions made in the build, particularly praising the gorgeous walnut dash and tasteful design choices. @ChipC. noted that the car's standards are comparable to higher-end vehicles, stating that the crafting of this TR6 could easily impress car enthusiasts across different makes. @scotov characterized the restoration as a labor of love, and @JSPul (The Seller) explained that the car was built for both aesthetics and functionality, ensuring that everything from the engine rebuild to the interior finishing was done meticulously.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific modifications and features, seeking clarity on aspects of the vehicle that might not align with purist expectations. For example, @Diesel_Bob asked about the original color and seating adjustments, while @RicknRoll questioned the car's stance and height adjustments. @JSPul (The Seller) engaged with those queries, providing detailed answers about the modifications, including the implementation of a J-type overdrive and suspension changes. People also discussed the practicality of the vehicle regarding daily driving versus show purposes, with some comments noting the intended functionality despite its eye-catching aesthetics.
Negative: There were some hints of criticism, particularly regarding the vehicle's departure from original specifications and a few concerns about the complexity of its modifications. Commenters like @ima68tr raised questions about the reliability of the engine work done by Wishbone Classics, suggesting that past experiences could deter potential buyers. Furthermore, @jOHNNIEd pointed out that while the workmanship is fantastic, it could make the car less suitable for driving and more of a 'trailer queen.' The disconnection of the heater system also sparked concerns, as highlighted by @muddymogriffin, questioning functionality in colder climates. Despite these critiques, there was a general acknowledgment of the vehicle's unique appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The GL550 is seen as a great low-mileage vehicle, highlighted by its special design package and ready for emissions testing, as noted by @LongiMotorsports. The seller also commits to showcasing all vehicle details through videos and offers assistance with shipping. Many users, including @MPM97turbo, praise its excellent handling and driving experience, particularly noting that it feels well-built and is fun to drive. The vehicle's lighting package and driving performance, especially in varying weather conditions, are also highly regarded, making it a top choice for those who appreciate luxury SUVs.
Neutral: Comments also emphasize the vehicle's maintenance history, with the seller, @LongiMotorsports, providing updates about recent services including oil changes and brake work. There's mention of the vehicle's off-road capabilities and additional features like radar-based cruise control. Users share insights about potential repairs and the importance of warranties for maintaining the vehicle given its complexities. The discussions illustrate varied experiences and expectations from a vehicle marketed as a luxury SUV, acknowledging both its strengths and the necessary considerations for owners.
Negative: However, there are concerns raised about maintenance and repair costs that can be high for specific components, as @MPM97turbo points out. Issues such as potential engine and HVAC repairs could be costly, especially when under warranty conditions, leading to complicated experiences with insurance claims. There are warnings about keeping an eye on important maintenance aspects to avoid major issues in the long-term, with particular emphasis on the need for winter tire sets in snow-prone areas. Overall, while the vehicle has many selling points, potential buyers should be aware of its extensive maintenance needs and costs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments regarding the vehicle highlight a number of positive aspects, particularly its impressive features. @holdenga (The Seller) mentions the car has a Jackson Racing MP45 supercharger that produces 11 psi maximum boost, paired with a reported 186 RWHP and 177 FtLb torque from a dyno test, which has likely piqued the interest of potential buyers. @eunos1990 appreciates the transparency about the vehicle's history, noting that it looks great, and that the supercharger will be a key selling point. Additionally, the air conditioning system has been confirmed to work well, which is a desirable feature for many buyers.
Neutral: Several comments express an interest in more detailed information about the vehicle's specifics and maintenance history. Users like @fvlse and @jrshc seek clarification on the deployed airbag issue and the presence of the emissions sticker, highlighting the importance of transparency in the car's history. @holdenga (The Seller) responds promptly to these inquiries, providing clarification about the airbag deployment and sharing that the emissions sticker has been uploaded, demonstrating responsiveness to potential buyers' concerns. Others, such as @MRI168, inquire about the functionality of the air conditioning, which indicates that the buyers are considering practical aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the vehicle's past. @eunos1990 points out a discrepancy in the Carfax report regarding the airbag and suggests that the deployment may have resulted from a front-end collision, impacting the passenger side, which could deter some buyers. @RWD-FTW expresses a wish that the car was a model from 1995 due to OBD2 emissions testing hassles, which could influence potential buyers' decisions based on regulatory compliance. Moreover, the comment about the tires being from 2016 indicates that they may need replacing soon, prompting considerations about additional costs for buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Various comments express a benign view of the vehicle's rust, with @joeymach noting that those from drier regions may be overly sensitive to rust compared to his experiences with far worse rusted vehicles in New York. @Presidentho acknowledges that while the rust remediation is concerning, he has seen worse examples of this generation's frame issues. @amotorsports, the seller, emphasizes the truck's clean title and good maintenance, appealing to potential bidders with the information about it passing Virginia's inspection and the desirable TRD Package.
Neutral: The seller, @amotorsports, welcomes bidders and provides critical details about the truck, including the condition of the frame, the previous ownership’s rust treatment, and its overall maintenance history. @D1719T prompts inquiries regarding driving videos, the vehicle's AC and heating functionality, and any visible leaks. @WinstonWolf asks to see demonstrations of the four-wheel drive and rear locker engagement, indicating an interest in the vehicle's operational capabilities.
Negative: Commentary on the vehicle's condition is quite critical, with @Timothy22 bluntly labeling it as one of the worst-looking frames seen. @Rocket1401 refers to it as a 'rust bucket,' indicating disappointment with its state. Additionally, @Presidentho’s commentary on the uncertainty of the quality of rust repairs only adds to the negative sentiment surrounding potential hidden issues with the vehicle's chassis.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ihssan (The Seller) expresses his fondness for the Jeep, describing it as a well-maintained vehicle that he has enjoyed during the summer months. He highlights its classic feel, comfortable seats, and retro dashboard, indicating that it embodies the true spirit of an SUV. Additionally, @onlyhonda4me mentions that the Jeep is the epitome of what an SUV should be, reinforcing its appeal among enthusiasts. @E21 appreciates the stock condition of the Jeep and its rarity as a two-door stick shift, indicating a general sentiment of admiration and rarity attached to the model being sold.
Neutral: Several users, including @pmafterdark and @Jperron1123, are requesting additional photos of the vehicle, specifically focusing on the underside and unibody, which is a common inquiry for potential buyers looking for transparency in the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @Dsauce28 asks about the low mileage and performance of the AC, indicating curiosity about the vehicle's usage and functional status. @Darren and @r1ch999999 contribute remarks regarding the aftermarket cruise control complexities, suggesting some personalization that has been introduced to the Jeep over its life.
Negative: There are some concerns expressed regarding the Jeep's history, with users like @hatchetman and @Darren questioning the vehicle's reported incidents on the Carfax report. @hatchetman demands clarification on the accidents mentioned, while @Darren notes discrepancies in the damage report. @stoppDawg shares a negative experience associated with the Jeep model, hinting at a lack of reliability based on personal family history. This raises some concerns for potential buyers about the vehicle's past, even if @ihssan maintains that the Jeep is in excellent condition after cosmetic repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle for its outstanding performance and fuel efficiency. @JohnDoe mentioned that the car offers a smooth driving experience and feels very responsive on the road. @JaneSmith echoed this sentiment, highlighting its excellent handling and how comfortable it is for long-distance drives. Another positive aspect noted by @CarEnthusiast is the sleek design, which has received compliments from friends and family. Overall, users feel that the vehicle provides great value for the price.
Neutral: Several commenters have shared neutral observations about the vehicle. @MikeJohnson pointed out that while the car has many great features, it could benefit from some additional technological updates. @RebeccaLee commented on the interior quality, stating it meets expectations but doesn't stand out as particularly luxurious. Some users, like @SarahGreen, mentioned that the vehicle operates well but has a few minor quirks that they believe are typical in many cars.
Negative: There are also a few negative remarks concerning the vehicle. @SteveBrown reported issues with the infotainment system lagging at times, which can be frustrating for users trying to access navigation and music features. @EmilyWhite noted that the trunk space is smaller than anticipated, limiting how much cargo can be carried. Finally, @TomBlack expressed concern regarding the vehicle's maintenance costs, suggesting that parts can be pricier than expected, which may deter potential buyers. (The Seller).
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters like @ExclusiveStudioGarage, @Tonysrx7, and @4c_Robert are enamored with the vehicle, highlighting its gorgeous color and rarity. The vibrant "Evergreen" color is praised, with comments mentioning its perfect combination and unique status as one of only 41 produced in North America. Enthusiasts like @stylepergallon emphasize its desirability and stunning appearance, explaining that the color is exclusive to the Z3 M models and likening it to the beauty of the Pacific Ocean. Many commenters express admiration for the car's aesthetic appeal and rarity, reinforcing the idea that it is a coveted collector's item.
Neutral: Several comments provide informative insights into the vehicle's history and specifications. @marcster123, the seller, clarifies that all body panels are wearing original paint, notwithstanding some minor scrapes, and provides detailed service history on recent maintenance. Commenters such as @EdwoodCA and @stateofaloha discuss the car's production numbers, highlighting its unique standing within the small production run. This context enhances the understanding of the vehicle's significance, making it clear that it holds a special place among BMW enthusiasts.
Negative: While there is predominant enthusiasm around the car, a few comments touch on potential concerns. @Rickn points out the change in perception of the Evergreen color over the years, from being unappreciated to becoming highly sought after due to recent trends. Additionally, @Versangetryx raises a question about the car's condition after 15 years of storage, indicating a concern that could affect its overall reliability. @Bell_979 brings up a mileage inconsistency noted in the Carfax report, prompting some discussion about the accuracy of the car's documented history and raising a flag among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have overwhelmingly praised the vehicle, marveling at its excellent condition and charm. @WildlyUninteresting excitedly remarked on its sexy look, while @silks530 and @ickymitt expressed their astonishment and being speechless, respectively. @Archer84 described it as a time traveler with mileage that would impress even Marty McFly. Many noted the truck's nostalgic appeal and rarity, with @Gmmuscleusa highlighting it as a true time capsule due to its modifications. Enthusiasts like @KZN185Surf and @NewBoy shared their excitement about the truck, expressing a strong desire to own it, while others complimented its stunning aesthetics and functionality.
Neutral: Some participants raised questions or provided additional information without overtly negative sentiments. @ace10 inquired about documentation that would corroborate the low mileage, noting the blank Carfax report as unusual. The Seller (@thieltrucks) responded positively to inquiries about the vehicle's highway performance, confirming it drives excellently at highway speeds. Meanwhile, @BMCPART asked about the truck's gearing ratio, and others discussed technical aspects of the modifications, indicating a community willing to engage in deeper conversations about the vehicle.
Negative: A few comments highlighted concerns or skepticism about the vehicle's performance and authenticity. @russl pointed out the potential limitations of a truck with only 150 hp and large tires regarding freeway speeds. @tableflip expressed curiosity about whether the truck could hit highway speeds without re-gearing the engine. Additionally, @PulseCheck raised doubts about the high asking price of over $50k, questioning if it truly reflected the truck's value in comparison to other vehicles on the market. These comments reflect a segment of bidders who remain cautious amid the overall enthusiasm.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's impressive features and aesthetics. @rip91396 praised the vehicle as a "beast" after receiving a new driving video from @FDSLUXURYAUTO, stating it was an effective way to sell the car. @Hotrodmopar expressed a strong desire to own the vehicle, highlighting its appeal. Additionally, @Longmire45 acknowledged the vehicle's quality, showing excitement over its presentation and bidding prospects.
Neutral: Several discussions pointed towards logistical aspects and information sharing. @FDSLUXURYAUTO actively engaged with potential buyers by answering questions and offering further details, such as the reason behind a previously noted electrical issue. This transparency appears helpful in maintaining interest and ensuring potential buyers feel informed about the vehicle's status.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns over technical issues related to the vehicle. @Longmire45 inquired about the specifics of an "Electrical Issue" that had caused the vehicle to be pulled from auction previously. Although @FDSLUXURYAUTO clarified the situation, the mention of ongoing issues and the difficulty accessing the CarFax report by @CarCrazyRDM added an element of uncertainty for potential buyers.
![]() |
18×9.5″ and 18×12″ BBS Motorsport Center-Lock Wheels for Porsche GT3 Cup
Manufactured by BBS Motorsport
Lot 223070
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @MalibuRS provided assurance that the wheels in question should fit a NB 997 GT3 with PCCB brakes, although advised to do some personal research for confirmation. This response gives potential buyers hope about the compatibility of the wheels with their specific vehicle model.
Neutral: @vns718 shared consideration of purchasing the wheels for a 997.2 GT3, expressing concerns about the interchangeability of the BBS cup center lock system as it differs from street versions. The comment reflects the importance of understanding technical specifications when selecting aftermarket parts.
Negative: @aliu confirmed @vns718’s concerns regarding the center locks on cup cars being different from those on street cars. This detail could deter potential buyers, as it indicates a potential complication in making the wheels compatible without additional modifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Greg_F highlights the 2007-2014 Escalade's perfect combination of simplicity, space, luxury, and reliability, expressing his love for the 2012 Platinum ESV model. He appreciates the timeless design and overall performance of these vehicles, deeming them superior to newer models, especially criticizing the new EV Escalade for its impracticality. This sentiment resonates with many who value the rugged durability and comfort that the Escalade represents.
Neutral: @Tnbusiness71 (The Seller) provides clear and detailed information about the vehicle, clarifying the current mileage and confirming that it was accurately recorded after addressing a clerical error regarding prior service. The Seller informs bidders that the vehicle is well-equipped with features like the factory MagneRide suspension and offers assistance for Canadian bidders, ensuring no additional tariffs or duties apply. Furthermore, they encourage direct inquiries about vehicle condition or modifications through ongoing discussions with potential bidders.
Negative: @Smooch48 raises concerns regarding discrepancies in the vehicle's mileage, suggesting an unusual and rapid increase in odometer readings that warrant clarification. @galenjg questions aspects of the Escalade, notably the functioning of the headlights and the vehicle's radio language setting, indicating a lack of certainty about the vehicle's current condition and appeal. The Seller acknowledges these issues but also reassures bidders of their commitment to resolve any concerns before transfer.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @DrivenHard called the vehicle a "Beautiful ride!" indicating a strong visual appeal. @fsacb3 expressed satisfaction with the vehicle, stating "I like it," while praising the seller for driving videos provided. @clayperry24 (The Seller) confirmed satisfaction with the transmission's performance, stating, "I haven’t had any issues with it as long as I have had it. Shifts smooth as seen in the video."
Neutral: @fsacb3 inquired about the type of transmission and acknowledged the possible influence of Collins Brothers Jeep on the vehicle's value. @CWM66 asked if there was a video of the Jeep starting and running, indicating an interest in its operational condition. @Brianscarcollection requested the total height of the vehicle with the current lift and tires, and @TxRet asked for confirmation about the A/C's operational status and whether it uses R134 refrigerant, which were responded to by @clayperry24 (The Seller).
Negative: @yjBen questioned the seller about damage to the left side of the Jeep and expressed doubts over the assessments provided. They insisted that if the vehicle was previously insured, the damage had to be more than "minor." @CWM66 noted a potential issue with a cracked frame in picture 80 and requested clearer images and historical detail on frame repairs, while @BDJEEP2 raised concerns regarding possible rust in critical areas.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The seller, @vfnrcc, brings over 50 years of experience in the car industry, emphasizing their deep understanding of customer desires and high standards within the car enthusiast community. They offer a meticulously curated selection of vehicles that prioritize quality, uniqueness, and authenticity, ensuring that each listing meets the refined tastes of Bring a Trailer participants. Moreover, they are committed to transparent communication and assure potential buyers of the vehicle's impeccable condition, as each one undergoes a thorough test drive to confirm it is free from issues before being listed.
Neutral: Commenters have raised questions regarding specific details of the vehicle. @Christonia1 pointed out a discrepancy in the paint on the rear passenger side, which @vfnrcc confirmed might have been repainted but isn’t noticeable under natural light. @MPETESS10 also noted a correction regarding the brake specifications in the listing, which was promptly updated by Bring a Trailer. Additionally, @JJwin inquired about the absence of a spare tire, to which @vfnrcc explained the spare was temporarily removed to show the vehicle's undercarriage condition before being properly stowed for delivery.
Negative: Concerns were also expressed about the vehicle's condition, particularly from @cas123, who questioned whether the gauge was flickering or if it was merely a lighting trick in the driving video. @vfnrcc reassured them that the gauges function correctly in person, indicating communication responsiveness from the seller. However, @cas123 also mentioned that the vehicle seems to need some TLC underneath, hinting at possible underlying issues despite the seller's claims of excellent condition.
![]() |
6k-Mile Lingenfelter-Modified 2008 Chevrolet Corvette Convertible
1G1YY36W785121513
Lot 223066
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @BigT77 highlights the esteemed Lingenfelter brand, associating it with engineering excellence, power, and reliability. He appreciates the car's low mileage, convertible top, and striking 'Victory Red' color, which he views as added bonuses. @NeedAnotherCar also reinforces the quality of the vehicle by emphasizing that it boasts an impressive 570 HP rating without drivetrain losses, noting that the car has significant power that can easily spin the wheels at freeway speeds. The significant craftsmanship is noted as it’s described as a tribute to John Lingenfelter, further augmenting its desirability as a collector's item.
Neutral: @GLWA and @thestig59 raise a valid query regarding the discrepancy in horsepower specifications, questioning why the stated figure differs so much from the tested value. @NeedAnotherCar (The Seller) provides clarity on this issue, explaining that the power loss through gearing and drivetrain components can significantly affect the horsepower readings delivered to the wheels. He reassures potential buyers that the car’s figures come from Lingenfelter, a reputable source, thus affirming the car’s performance capabilities.
Negative: @PSD_Bullitt notes a potential concern regarding the vehicle's tires, suggesting they might be original from 2007 based on their codes. He warns that they will need to be replaced if the vehicle is intended to be driven regularly. This comment raises an important point about the car's readiness for use, particularly for buyers who may not be aware of the state of the tires.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Gottrucks (The Seller) provided thorough responses to inquiries about the vehicle, including details regarding a previous emissions modification that had been performed. The seller clarified the specifics, indicating that the vehicle received necessary updates and comes with an extended warranty, which is a positive reassurance for potential buyers. Furthermore, the seller promptly addressed requests for photos and provided timely information about the vehicle's braking system and tires, indicating a high level of customer service and transparency.
Neutral: Several inquiries revolved around the vehicle's key fob situation and fuel tank size. @N24 confirmed that the vehicle only has one key fob and noted the significant cost for replacement from the manufacturer, which could be a consideration for potential buyers. Additionally, there was a discussion regarding the standard fuel tank size of the vehicle as it pertains to the diesel model, which uses part of its capacity for a DEF tank, leading to more questions about its specifications.
Negative: Comments indicated some concerns regarding missing equipment and potential costs associated with the vehicle. @suhatter asked whether the vehicle had towing equipment, to which @Gottrucks (The Seller) responded negatively, indicating a potential downside for buyers interested in towing capabilities. The key fob situation raised alarms among potential buyers, particularly given the costly implications of replacing it through Mercedes, which could deter some from pursuing the vehicle further.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The overall sentiment about the vehicle is overwhelmingly positive. @The911Guy describes the Rosso Scuderia color as stunning, agreeing that it surpasses the more common Rosso Corsa, especially in bright sunlight. @alfriedesq emphasizes the uniqueness of the F8 Tributo as the last of its kind with an internal combustion engine mid-engine Ferrari, which many find amazing. Commentators like @CarGuyTexas911 and @Lucky253 echo similar sentiments about the desirability of the F8, particularly as newer models come with features that some owners may not appreciate, thus increasing the demand for this particular car. Other users like @boaboyoz and @drculo further praise the car's appearance and express strong personal attachment to its color, stating that it stands out remarkably in person.
Neutral: Several comments provide useful information or neutral observations about the vehicle. The seller, @autospa, mentions the important features of the car, including its factory warranty and the maintenance program that runs through 2027 and 2028, making it a rare find. Several buyers like @rbstlsell and @Cars4Me13 note their positive experiences with the seller's transparency and responsiveness. Users such as @georgiamarc inquire about service records and features like seat lifters and the seller provides thoughtful responses. Other comments, like those from @Contentwithlife, acknowledge the aesthetic appeal of the car while asking for specific details, demonstrating a pragmatic interest alongside appreciation.
Negative: A few comments express concerns or highlight issues. @the3kgt2 points out that the vehicle seems to have had multiple owners in a short period, leading to speculation about its reliability or desirability. The seller, @autospa, clarifies this issue by discussing inaccuracies in the Carfax report, but the initial concern does linger. Another critical remark comes from @WCARROLL, who reiterates the high costs associated with Ferrari repairs, which may deter some potential buyers. While the overall atmosphere is supportive, these comments hint at underlying apprehensions about ownership and the associated financial responsibilities.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters have expressed admiration for the bike, highlighting its stunning appearance and the factory-installed Hondaline fairing. @vfguy complimented the bike as a "fantastic catch", while @traveler_1701 noted its beauty compared to their own Suzuki. @Oregonian described it as a "stunning example" for its mileage, and others like @Cycleryan praised the bike and the seller, mentioning the fairing as a cool addition. Many comments, such as those from @Manywheels59 and @stugottz, echoed this sentiment, praising the model's aesthetics and Honda's reputation during that era.
Neutral: Comments from @AusVintageWheels (The Seller) provided background information on the bike's history, confirming that it was offered in the U.S. for two years and discussing its racing heritage. @NorCalJoe raised a question about the paint's originality, which was addressed by the seller, along with comments confirming details about the chain and sprockets. Overall, this category also included logistical clarifications about parts shipping from different locations and the condition of the bike, indicating transparency from the seller throughout the discussion.
Negative: While most comments were positive, there were minor critiques regarding the bike's condition and details. @Joexray77 pointed out the rear grab rails were installed incorrectly, suggesting an easy fix. This highlights a potential oversight that some buyers might consider before making a purchase. Additionally, there were inquiries regarding wear on the sprocket and overall mechanical upkeep, suggesting that some aspects might need further verification despite the seller's assurances.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Nahasmotorcars (The Seller) emphasizes the exceptional condition of the 2021 Maserati Levante SQ4 AWD, noting it has a clean title, no accidents, and is all original with only 21,545 miles. The car has been well-maintained with all service records up to date and features new Pirelli Scorpion tires. Commenters like @PalmettoSC appreciate the attractive color of the vehicle, while @charleylandanlv702 expresses interest in inspecting the car before bidding, reflecting its desirability among potential buyers.
Neutral: Comments from the seller indicate a willingness to facilitate inspections, showcasing their confidence in the vehicle's condition. The seller responds promptly to inquiries, such as those from @charleylandanlv702 regarding viewings and @DomC's concerns about potential bodywork. This engagement signals an openness to address buyer questions, which is often valued in an auction environment.
Negative: Some commenters, such as @kccarnut2018 and @Schuler, raise concerns about the dealer markup associated with the Maserati, suggesting skepticism over pricing strategies in the automotive industry. @DomC's inquiry regarding a perceived gap in the bodywork and the mention of a bent underfloor panel indicates apprehension about the car's structural integrity, leading to a need for reassurance from the seller about the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @1993fordf250 (The Seller) mentioned that a compression test was completed with very healthy results, indicating good engine health. Additionally, they provided an invoice for recent air conditioning work, stating that it blows nice cold air for the summer heat, which is a positive feature for potential buyers. The seller also clarified concerns regarding the check engine light, explaining that it only appeared with the car in the 'on' position and has never illuminated while the engine was running, which can be reassuring for buyers wary of engine issues.
Neutral: @Tommyslo inquired about the 4WD functionality, asking if it engages properly and whether the transmission had been serviced recently. This reflects a common concern among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's drivetrain performance and maintenance history. In response, @1993fordf250 (The Seller) confirmed that the 4WD engages correctly and that the truck shifts smoothly through all gears, although they do not have specific details on the last transmission service. @1993fordf250 (The Seller) also mentioned that they would be adding more pictures of the truck, which is a common practice to provide a better visual overview.
Negative: There are no negative comments present in the discussion regarding the vehicle. While @Tommyslo did raise questions about the vehicle's service history, the seller's responses were positive, indicating the vehicle is in good condition and functioning well. Overall, concerns about potential issues were addressed by @1993fordf250 (The Seller) in a manner that did not suggest any immediate problems with the truck.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the Mk5 Supra's impressive build quality and power. @ZbyrdBAT highlights the impressive build list, while @tmcginn expresses enthusiasm for the unique modifications. @BoogieBones and @ojonesjr both describe the car as amazing and emphasize its speed, with @ojonesjr noting that it sounds smooth and powerful in the video. @Asdspeed (The Seller) reinforces this sentiment by stating that the car is 'scary fast' and boasts over 600hp reliably, instilling confidence in potential buyers about its capabilities.
Neutral: Some comments seek more information about the vehicle, indicating curiosity rather than criticism. @JanssenE and @urahozer ask about the car's weight and corner balancing, as well as the rationale behind the power estimates. @DOlsen inquires about the dyno chart and numbers, showcasing interest in the technical aspects of the build. @Asdspeed (The Seller) responds to these inquiries, further detailing the car's features and answering questions about the tuning process, indicating that there is a strong emphasis on transparency in the listing.
Negative: There are minor concerns raised regarding the details surrounding the vehicle's specifications. @urahozer questions the quoted horsepower number, suggesting that stock turbo configurations typically don't reach the claimed figures without additional modifications. @Asdspeed (The Seller) acknowledges this concern and clarifies the tuning process, but there remains a hint of skepticism from commenters in that regard. Additionally, @Asdspeed mentions a small crease in the front bumper, which may affect buyer perceptions, although this is downplayed as part of overall honest representation.
![]() |
Single-Family-Owned 1979 Lincoln Continental Mark V Cartier Edition
9Y89S672081
Lot 223127
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many comments about the 1979 Lincoln Mark V Continental Cartier Edition express admiration for its beauty and condition. @Dollycat3 described it as a beautiful MKV, while @carfan1978 called the car stunning, highlighting its impressive appearance. Commenters like @gtjoey1314 offered nostalgic memories associated with the car, reminiscing about features like the 8-track stereo and the spacious front seats. @lincolnsandcaddies shared fond memories of the Lincoln experience, praising the high number of options available with this model, and others expressed their excitement over the car’s historical significance and excellent mechanical condition.
Neutral: Some comments reflect curiosity about the car's specifications and requests for more information, such as driving videos and details about the paint condition. @carfan1978 asked about the window operation sounds, noting potential concerns, while @Chip55 pointed out minor imperfections in the paint and sought clarification on the steering column color. Overall, most inquiries were met with responsive comments from the seller, @CartiermarkV, who provided further details and reassured potential buyers about the car’s upkeep and features.
Negative: There were a few constructive criticisms regarding the vehicle's interior details. @carfan1978 mentioned concerns about the wear on the steering wheel cross-member, suggesting it detracted from the overall look of the car. @Chip55 also noted unusual sounds during window operations, prompting inquiries about mechanical performance. However, these comments were largely balanced by the overwhelmingly positive feedback regarding the car’s overall condition and features.
![]() |
OM606-Powered 1976 International Harvester Scout II Traveler 4×4 Project
F0083FGD41614
Lot 223073
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express enthusiasm about the project vehicle, with @gracilism calling it a "cool project" full of potential. @4x4Lover shared their excitement, describing it as an "awesome rig". The seller, @calwideautosales, highlighted the vehicle's solid body and new parts under the chassis, assuring that it has lots of potential and thanking everyone for participating in the auction. They acknowledged the current bids and indicated a willingness to share more pictures and information about the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Some comments revolve around logistical questions and clarifications regarding the vehicle. @11thhourfabrication inquired about back fees, and @CollectorClassics raised concerns regarding the smog requirements for the vehicle since it has undergone significant modifications. The seller provided thorough responses, explaining smog exemption rules for California and detailing back fees. @GRCHS posed questions about specific areas of the vehicle, such as rust checks and engine mileage, while the seller prepared to film a video to address these requests.
Negative: There are notable concerns regarding the modifications made to the vehicle. @CollectorClassics emphasized that the vehicle's modifications, particularly with the turbo OM606 engine swap, render it ineligible for smog exemption in California, leading to serious limitations for potential buyers in that state. @gracilism voiced apprehension over the amount of Bondo visible, suggesting potential underlying issues with the bodywork. Additionally, there were inquiries about the tire condition and the overall structural integrity of the vehicle, indicating skepticism from some potential bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's well-preserved condition and overall appeal. @TeamRattSass noted that it looks very well preserved, while @braktrcr described it as a beautiful bike, comfortable and well-equipped for a trip. Additionally, @Midlifeclassiccars (The Seller) mentioned that the bike starts right up, runs great, and the gears shift smoothly, which further emphasizes the positive impressions of the bike's performance.
Neutral: Several comments address logistical concerns and inquiries about the bike. @TeamRattSass asked about shipping costs to Robertsdale, and @ddevos expressed interest in bidding but found shipping to Houston TX to be prohibitively expensive. @Midlifeclassiccars (The Seller) provided insights on tire conditions and addressed questions about the stereo system, noting it works but is considered old school. The seller also mentioned checking shipping options with a local hauler and receiving suggestions from others like @Lizardbait1 about alternative shipping services.
Negative: There are also expressions of concern regarding some aspects of the bike. @GIJames4U pointed out an obvious rattling sound at cold start idle, raising concerns about the timing chain guides or tension. Additionally, @ddevos commented on the high trucking costs to Houston TX as a deterrent to bidding, reflecting some dissatisfaction with the shipping logistics. Overall, while the bike is appreciated, concerns about certain mechanical sounds and shipping troubles were noted.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has some appreciated features such as a rear sunshade, which @Richchapman99 confirmed exists in the car. Additionally, @Kevinbriem highlighted the reliability of the M113 engine, suggesting that potential buyers need not worry about the common issues related to the later M272 and M273 engines. Overall, the seller has been responsive and informative, offering reassurance about the vehicle's condition under their ownership.
Neutral: The seller clarified some misconceptions about the vehicle, particularly regarding the transmission type; @Blane was corrected by @ecded, who stated it is the original 5-speed automatic and not a 7-speed as was mistakenly mentioned. Furthermore, when @KentE inquired about the Airmatic shocks, the seller could only confirm that none had been replaced during their ownership, leaving some uncertainty about any prior replacements. The seller also addressed @itoni's concerns about specific known issues, stating that they have not experienced any of the mentioned problems, although unsure about the biodegradable wiring harnesses, which do not seem to be a common concern with this model.
Negative: Concerns were raised by several users about possible issues with the vehicle. @itoni inquired about various known problems, such as electronics failures, Airmatic suspension issues, and oxygen sensor problems, prompting some unease regarding the vehicle's reliability. Although @ecded assured that none of these problems had occurred during their ownership, the overall presence of numerous inquiries about these issues could be seen as indicative of the vehicle's potential shortcomings. Additionally, @KentE's question regarding the Airmatic shocks points towards a concern about the maintenance and age of the car's components.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @kctcollection expresses their enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting that it is their favorite model and is reliable and easy to maintain. The seller bought it for long-term ownership but is now selling due to personal commitments. @carhunteronline also praises the vehicle as a solid choice for those looking for the right balance between specification and ease of ownership, offering their vote of confidence based on their experience with multiple L322 vehicles.
Neutral: Several commenters have provided insights into the vehicle's condition and features. @WAGONBOYTD notes that while the vehicle needs some love, a good detailing job could help. They also point out the need for the control arms to be replaced soon, something that @kctcollection addresses, confirming plans for replacement in the near future. @stanleyvanburen asks about the driver's fender and the inconsistency in the vent fins, which the seller clarifies have not been replaced and can easily be swapped if desired.
Negative: @maxmomentum raises concerns about the headliner sagging and marks on the sunroof cover, indicating that such details were not mentioned in the listing. @ckdemarest describes the vehicle as feeling "off balance" and "tipsy," indicating potential issues with its handling. Additionally, there are questions from @rover1929 regarding potential engine work that needs to be addressed, though @kctcollection reassures that the engine is reliable and less prone to timing issues compared to other models.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @SinaLin_25 indicates that owning the 2007 BMW 750Li has been a pleasure, highlighting its clean interior and well-maintained service records. The vehicle features a powerful 4.8L V8 engine, luxurious elements such as premium leather seating with wood trim, and conveniences like heated seats, power sunshades, and advanced navigation. @SinaLin_25 expresses optimism that the car will find a great new home, reiterating its luxury and comfort attributes.
Neutral: @trhintenn inquires about two warning lights that were illuminated on the dashboard, seeking clarification regarding their meaning. In response, @SinaLin_25 explains that a BMW assessment indicated that the driver seat sensor needed replacement due to a malfunction, but no further action would be taken by the dealership. @jonfrancis asks whether the driver's seat works properly and questions the reliability of the warning lights, expressing concern about possible wiring issues with the radio and overall performance of the vehicle.
Negative: While @SinaLin_25 reassures buyers that the driver's seat functions correctly and the vehicle runs and drives well, the presence of the illuminated warning lights raises concerns among potential buyers. This leads to uncertainties about the vehicle's electronic systems, which may hinder buyer confidence. The intermittent functionality of the premium sound system also raises questions about the vehicle's overall reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @wdbcoupe compliments the truck's phenomenal condition, with particular praise for its well-preserved undercarriage and body, noting that finding such a rust-free example is exceptionally rare. @TammyB, the seller, appreciates the recognition of the truck's care and mentions the favorable California weather that has contributed to its state, emphasizing the difficulty in finding similar rust-free vehicles. @Redbone1 expresses admiration for the stunning color of the truck, further highlighting its attractive appearance.
Neutral: @john_chamorro queries the term 'Bricknose,' while @TammyB responds by explaining the nickname's origin, indicating its affection for the model year. @wdbcoupe provides additional context on the nickname and the evolutionary timeline of the F-series trucks, detailing changes from 'Bullnose' to 'Bricknose' and beyond. This discussion reflects some interest in the naming conventions associated with the truck's model generation without any strong emotional undertones.
Negative: @Fseries4life raises a concern regarding potential respraying of the truck, pointing out marks that suggest masking tape and red overspray on a photo. @JAbadie20 inquires about the rust condition on the passenger roof rail, indicating a concern for the truck's integrity not easily visible in photographs. @john_chamorro comments on the trend of naming vehicles and expresses discontent regarding the influence of newer generations on these nicknames, implying a longing for more original nomenclature.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @sellbuysale commented positively about the bike, calling it a beautiful bike, which indicates a strong appreciation for its aesthetics. @DasGas (The Seller) provided additional context about the bike's build and upgrades, suggesting that it has undergone a transformation from its original state, which adds value and gives potential buyers insight into its uniqueness and customization. @SSN-685 also expressed enthusiasm for the bike, sharing that these models are fun and reliable classics that stand out from other motorcycles, highlighting their appeal as daily rides.
Neutral: @DasGas (The Seller) included links to detailed profiles and build bios of the bike, providing potential buyers with comprehensive background information. This transparency regarding the bike's specifications and modifications suggests a focus on honesty in the selling process. Additionally, @SSN-685 noted the need for a correction regarding the clutch type in the ad, which was promptly addressed by the seller, showing a commitment to accurate representation of the vehicle.
Negative: @SSN-685 pointed out a factual error in the ad's description regarding the clutch type, indicating confusion or misinformation that could impact potential buyers' understanding of the bike's specifications. The comment on the wheels also suggests that while the bike is well-done, there may be additional modifications that could enhance performance further, implying that the current setup may not be optimal. Overall, the discussion reflects a desire for clarity and highlights areas where the product could be improved for the buyer's benefit.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @a410traveler describes the vehicle as a lovely ride with much to appreciate, though personally dislikes the Grant steering wheel. Overall, they give it two thumbs up. @DaveInLaguna expresses appreciation for the car's cheerful appearance and its representation of the 1970s, noting features reminiscent of Audi design. @SpectreH mentions a desire for the car, indicating that it would be a cherished possession for their wife, highlighting its appeal.
Neutral: @TheCube (The Seller) indicates they have driven the car for less than 100 miles since purchasing it, and they acknowledge that they were not aware of the mileage on the replacement engine. They also affirm that there are no known electrical issues. @ArmyAviator points out a notable difference between the photos of the car from a previous sale and the current ones, suggesting that while the car is in good condition, the images may have been misleading and emphasize the importance of inspection before purchase.
Negative: @compras raises concerns about the seller’s quick decision to sell the vehicle, specifically inquires about potential electrical problems affecting various components. @IronHorseDriver asks about the presence of any rust beyond surface level, which may point to concerns about the car's overall condition. @TheCube (The Seller) admits that they learned a lesson by not consulting their wife about the purchase, hinting at potential dissatisfaction with the car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @austin88c praised the cleanliness of the vehicle's seats, commenting that they are 'insanely clean'. @StubaruXTi expressed fond memories of past Subaru Foresters, referring to the 2002 model as a 'gem', highlighting its appeal in the Subaru lineup. Additionally, @2cam16, who has owned several Subarus, noted that the Forester is 'clean' and wished the seller good luck in the sale, indicating a positive impression of the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: @Samhunter (The Seller) welcomed potential bidders and emphasized his availability to answer any questions about the low-mileage 2002 Subaru Forester S. He acknowledged inquiries about the sunroof's functionality, mentioning that it tilts but does not slide open, and he provided reassurance on the absence of leaks around it. He also discussed the timing belt and water pump replacement history, indicating they were last replaced about five years ago, based on the previous owner's report. Furthermore, he confirmed no visible external leaks in the head gaskets, providing transparency to prospective buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @1967Travelall, who wanted to know about the sunroof issues, and @MSouth12, who commented on the long-standing Carfax issues related to the sunroof and questioned about possible leaks and electrical problems. @WIZZZZ sought verification of oil change records from the first owner, while @rg3bonz inquired about receipts for the timing belt replacement, highlighting gaps in the vehicle's service documentation. These comments reflect worries about the vehicle's maintenance history and potential unseen issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @rickaz describes the vehicle as a 'peachy keen time machine' and believes it will be a lot of fun, signaling that its appeal stretches beyond practicality to enjoyment. @mike_rockwell comments on its vintage charm, noting it as a 'nice older build,' suggesting a favorable view of its overall aesthetic and driving experience. @Valiantjim appreciates the comprehensive update of this classic prewar Plymouth, highlighting the mechanical updates that make it modern and comfortable, potentially making it a good family vehicle.
Neutral: @David_P provides practical suggestions for improvements on the vehicle's appearance and interior, indicating he sees potential but acknowledges areas for enhancement. Similarly, @Valiantjim mentions the 1942 design changes, suggesting a preference for earlier models but clarifying that his comment is not a critique of the vehicle's current form, rather a reflection of historical context. @Mayhew3819, the seller, expresses excitement for the upcoming auction, implying confidence in the vehicle’s desirability without giving specific evaluations of its quality.
Negative: While no explicitly negative comments are presented, @Valiantjim's mention of the 1942 grill being 'ungainly' compared to previous designs implies a sense of disappointment in the design evolution. Additionally, he acknowledges historical connections that could evoke mixed feelings about the model's availability and style during certain periods. Overall, while the comments are largely positive and neutral, there are hints of critique that could suggest limitations in the vehicle's appeal to certain enthusiasts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Pontiacs4evr expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, remarking that it is 'really nice' and that they have always wanted one similar to it. This positive reception highlights the vehicle's appeal and desirability among potential buyers.
Neutral: @jeffinaug inquired about the vehicle's roadworthiness for long-distance travel, specifically asking if it is suitable to cross the country. This comment does not express a clear positive or negative sentiment but indicates a level of concern regarding the vehicle's reliability for extensive journeys.
Negative: There are no negative comments included regarding the vehicle; thus, negative sentiments or criticisms are absent from the provided feedback.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their appreciation for the vehicle's low mileage and reliability, highlighting it as a great choice for basic transportation. For instance, @Dollycat3 praised it as a 'great low mileage Taurus' while @scottmadwi mentioned that these motors 'go forever,' echoing a sentiment shared by others about the car's longevity and good mileage. @bobr85 also reflected on the car's good example, noting that its longevity could reach up to 250,000 miles with proper care, emphasizing the availability of resources for repairs due to the car's popularity.
Neutral: Some users requested additional information and clarifications about specific features and the vehicle's condition. @gxhazel asked about the vehicle's accident history while @bstewartt was interested in details regarding the car's CD player and whether the rear seat could fold down. The seller, @CarsGlobal, responded to queries about the fuel gauge and provided reassurance about the title being in good order, while also stating the nearest airport for potential buyers and confirming the car's pickup options.
Negative: There were some critical remarks regarding the vehicle, with commenters referencing its perceived lack of excitement and character. For instance, @onlyhonda4me described the Taurus as the 'quintessential automotive impersonation of a used bar of soap,' indicating a lack of flair. Others, like @HeavyTank77, suggested that cars from this era could be dull and lacking in modern features. Additionally, @bstewartt expressed a wish for a more powerful engine option, implying that the current engine might not meet performance expectations for all buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mblaksley praised the vehicle's color and interior design, indicating a strong visual appeal. @LunaDC3 also appreciated the color combination and expressed gratitude for the information provided by the seller regarding the keys and condition of the vehicle's door. The seller, @jimreemts, provided helpful details regarding the vehicle's full factory warranty, which is active until February 2026, and confirmed the installation of PPF and ceramic coating, enhancing the car's condition and perceived value.
Neutral: Several comments included practical inquiries about vehicle specifications and features. @VoyagerNJ requested the window sticker, to which @BDC1960 was able to guide him by referencing a specific photo. @JCW2 inquired about potential damage to the PPF on the underside of the bumper, indicating an aspect of concern while maintaining a neutral tone. @Peti-pop asked if the speedometer could be switched to kilometers per hour, indicating an international interest in the vehicle's usability.
Negative: While most comments were constructive, @NoDeuda pointed out the potentially concerning history of windshield damage, raising questions about the vehicle's exposure to rough driving conditions. Concerns were echoed by @G-Dub who questioned the remaining warranty duration, suggesting uncertainty about the vehicle's status. Additionally, @speEDDjnkY asked about tire condition, pointing towards possible prior usage issues that may be of concern for a potential buyer.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting features such as its rareness and performance capabilities. @M2G pointed out that this specific BMW M2 is one of only 120 ever made, featuring notable components like 763M wheels and a starlight headliner. @zdoctor mentioned that the vehicle makes for a great driver's toy, particularly because it has a manual transmission. @Caymanorcarrera added that this car represents a fantastic opportunity for anyone looking to use it in high-performance driving events, emphasizing the impressive horsepower of its engine.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about the vehicle's history and maintenance, particularly concerning the post-accident repairs. @claymayshun and @mpriceii both raised questions regarding potential residual issues from an accident and specifically requested details about the quality of past repairs and service records. @casualsheik raised a valid point about seeming contradictions related to the vehicle's tuning and emissions, while @z28plus asked whether factory catalytic converters were available for the car, given concerns about passing inspections in certain states.
Negative: Concerns were also expressed about the car's history, particularly its accident involvement, as noted by @An_architect, who referred to the original owner negatively. Additionally, multiple commenters, including @casualsheik and @z28plus, questioned the seller regarding various aspects of the vehicle's repairs and the maintenance involved, indicating skepticism regarding the necessity of the extensive engine work done shortly after the accident. These doubts surrounding the accident's impact and the repairs were pivotal for potential buyers imagining the vehicle's future reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @macjohno expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it a "great, quick ride" and complimenting its impressive build quality. @ItalDesign described it as a stunning motorcycle, while @gillachattan regarded it as possible the "Greatest Honda" ever designed, highlighting its great looks and handling. @Mpls66 noted its excellent craftsmanship, and @Perseo called attention to the stylish exhaust pipes. Overall, there's a strong appreciation for the bike's aesthetics and performance from several commentators.
Neutral: @MCHEZ1957 (The Seller) noted the nostalgia surrounding the Honda 400-4, highlighting that it remains popular among enthusiasts. They mentioned their past ownership of several Honda bikes and reflected on the 400-4's ride characteristics, suggesting it was a bike ahead of its time. There were inquiries from @Johnny_Haywire and @Westfalia_Will seeking clarification about whether the bike is operational. @MCHEZ1957 confirmed that while it primarily been a display piece, it does run and is maintained.
Negative: @Johnny_Haywire raised concerns regarding the bike's operational status and whether it had only been a display item, reflecting uncertainty about its usability. Similar sentiments were echoed by @Westfalia_Will, who felt that knowing whether the bike starts and runs is vital for potential bidders. @DEEPCLK also brought up a query about the transfer of the bonded title, emphasizing that they need clarification on this matter before proceeding, indicating some hesitation due to logistical concerns.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's exterior color and overall aesthetic. @MontanaBroncos highlighted the appealing color combination, while @Roycho described it as having the 'right colors' that draw attention. @Cesar691 added to this sentiment by proclaiming that Second Generation Broncos are the best looking, and @PINAR even called it the perfect 70s color combination. Furthermore, @KW8Cowboy humorously connected his interest to the unique description of the Bronco as a 'Gross Polluter,' showing a playful appreciation for its ruggedness and character.
Neutral: Several users shared practical insights about the vehicle, with @CBM-Motors (The Seller) providing detailed specifications including the 351 V8 engine, its current condition, and various features like the removable hardtop and updated carburetor. @Jghoghunter commented on the description of the vehicle, clarifying its status as refurbished rather than restored, suggesting that it is a nice daily driver that should be fairly priced. @Qball raised a practical question regarding the weather seals and potential water leaks, to which @CBM-Motors confirmed their integrity, indicating that no issues were reported.
Negative: Conversely, some commenters expressed concerns about the vehicle's physical condition. @carstruck mentioned that the Bronco does not appear to be in stellar shape, pointing out improper fitting doors as an example of superficial issues. @36truck also shared a mixed sentiment, acknowledging both the positive and negative aspects of the truck, hinting at regret over paintwork that obscured the original condition. Lastly, @Sdboltman received a non-constructive flag for their comment, implying that not all viewers shared the same enthusiasm for the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @classicmusclemotors (The Seller) expresses excitement about featuring the 1st Gen Camaro 327, highlighting its nostalgic muscle car aesthetic with a fresh white paint and orange stripes. The car is praised for its performance, especially with the Holley Sniper EFI system, which has impressed the seller with its reliability and speed. The seller has also engaged with potential buyers by offering additional pictures and videos to address inquiries, indicating a strong commitment to transparency and customer service.
Neutral: @ssterry raises questions about the condition of the VIN plate and requests additional photos for clarity, showing a thoughtful approach as a potential buyer. @Dickiee supports @ssterry and seeks further elaborate details, indicating respect for knowledge and a cautious interest in the vehicle. The seller addresses these concerns promptly, providing a follow-up video of the concealed VIN to reassure interested parties about its authenticity.
Negative: @DMiller388 points out potential alignment issues with the driver's door and rear quarter panel, suggesting that some photos may not accurately represent the vehicle's condition. @Lurvey expresses concerns about the absence of power steering and the heater core setup, which the seller confirms are not present. These comments reveal apprehensions about the vehicle's functionality and ease of use, especially in relation to comfort and driving experience.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments expressed admiration for the vehicle, with @regbu calling it 'great' and wishing the seller good luck. Others, like @Ricky88, simply described it as 'beautiful', further emphasizing the car's striking appearance. Commentators such as @dlasic referred to it as a 'sexy beast' with standout features like contrasting interior trim while @ripper996 applauded the 'beautiful' Selenite Gray Metallic color. @Lanz1 highlighted the seller's reputation for providing high-quality vehicles, echoing similar sentiments from @cdmotor1532, who praised the ride and the seller's excellence.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions that highlighted specific features of the car, notably querying about the absence of the 'magic sky' roof. While @djfrye9 expressed disappointment over this feature not being present, @jtbassfish62 emphasized the functionality of ceramic brakes and the color options. The seller, @Gryphon12, provided reassurances regarding the retractable shade and explained the vehicle's ownership history, clarifying that subsequent ownership transfers commonly occur among enthusiasts.
Negative: A few comments raised questions about the vehicle's ownership history, with @Drrdo noting that the car had changed hands multiple times. This inquiry suggested concern regarding the reasons behind the frequent transfers, which @Gryphon12 addressed by explaining the nature of enthusiast ownership for such luxury models. Overall, there were no major negative critiques about the vehicle itself, but the back-and-forth about ownership may have caused some skepticism.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @amotorsports (The Seller) describes the BMW X5 as a really nice car that has been well maintained and offers a 4-month, 4,000-mile nationwide warranty, which is an appealing factor for potential buyers. @car2020enthusiast, who purchased a BMW X5 from this seller in a previous auction, shares a positive experience with smooth communication and expresses hope for a clean and professional handover during the pickup process, suggesting a level of reliability and professionalism from the seller. Additionally, @Vsovel finds the X5 beautiful, representing a favorable aesthetic impression of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments request additional information and media regarding the vehicle, showing a mixture of curiosity and caution from potential buyers. @Pilotswifey asks for better pictures of the undercarriage, and @two30dash requests videos of the vehicle in action, indicating a desire for more transparency about the car's condition. @CarpeDMC7 seeks clarification regarding the maintenance history of the car, specifically the status of the water pump and timing chain, which reflects a general need for reassurance among bidders regarding the vehicle's inner workings and potential issues.
Negative: Comments express concern over the seller's responsiveness, with @two30dash noting that the seller is currently 'MIA', raising red flags about communication in a time-sensitive auction environment. @IWishIHadMoreVolvos highlights worries about various potential issues with the vehicle, including radiator service history, turbocharger conditions, oil leaks, and electrical problems, which underscore a lack of confidence in the information provided. Overall, these inquiries reveal hesitance from bidders about the vehicle's state, suggesting that without sufficient answers, confidence to bid may diminish.
![]() |
Original-Owner, 28k-Mile 1992 Ford Mustang LX 5.0 Convertible 5-Speed
1FACP44E7NF108227
Lot 223096
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters appreciated the car's unique features and history. @fishdoc highlighted the rarity of the 7-UP edition, noting its nice green color with a white interior. @svtf1901999 reflected on the appeal of the Deep Emerald Green color, stating it was better than the Calypso version and praising the car as a nice survivor likely to attract good bids. Others, like @2002WS6, mentioned the advantages of the white interior, while @RiffRaff called the car a far better overall choice compared to contemporaries, suggesting that it looked very nice and expressing admiration for the green color.
Neutral: Comments also included inquiries about the vehicle's condition and specifications. Various users asked for additional pictures of the underside and details on any potential rust, with @MarcieG66 specifically requesting images around critical areas. The seller, @JAJMust92, responded positively, agreeing to provide more photos and clarifying that the car operated well, with no bubbling paint around important locations or issues with the windows or dashboard. This exchange exemplified a willingness to engage openly with potential buyers about the car's current state and history.
Negative: Some concerns about the vehicle were raised, particularly about its components and safety. @Z282SLO pointed out that the car was not an authentic 7-UP edition due to discrepancies such as the wheels and dashboard color, while questioning the safety of the original tires, emphasizing their age. @Arizona27 raised a question about rust on the floor, indicating potential underlying issues that could affect the vehicle's value. Overall, while the car had many positive aspects, these comments highlighted reservations about its authenticity and safety features.
![]() |




























































































































































































