Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: @GLTL expresses a hopeful enthusiasm for the vehicle, wishing for it as a Christmas gift. @schmock88 appreciates the car's historical significance and legacy, while @Pcrtom shares a personal connection, expressing excitement about having driven a similar version of the car. @ProCoach compliments the vehicle's appearance, indicating confidence in its quality and its potential as a wonderful investment for a new owner. @ScoobyDone discusses the historical value of Lola racecars, highlighting their competitive legacy and expressing that this specific model would be a valuable addition to any collection.
Neutral: @Yomamma points out a detail about the car's engine, suggesting it hasn't been mentioned in the description. @Peter_K asks about shipping options to the US, acknowledging a lack of knowledge but showing interest in adding the car to a collection. @ChevyDave comments on the current bidding situation, suggesting that the bids may not reflect the car's true value, indicating a misunderstanding among some bidders.
Negative: @ProCoach raises concerns about discrepancies in the car's engine descriptions and the authenticity of the photographs shown, questioning if the correct engine is included. @HumerGranner, in response to @ProCoach, admits to the error regarding engine photos and assures that they will correct the listing. @ampeng emphasizes that the bidding does not align with the likely market value of the car, stating that significant tariffs could complicate its sale from outside the USA, thus painting a cautious picture about its marketability.
 |
 |
Positive: @PulseCheck praised the vehicle's specifications and modifications, expressing admiration for its performance and value compared to its price. They highlighted the reliability of modded F80s regarding crank hub issues, emphasizing that many well-performing cars exist without such issues. @JACO001 and @wem5310 also admired the vehicle, with @JACO001 sharing a personal experience of owning an M3 CS and noting its attractive sound and performance. @slamnss (The Seller) also received positive feedback regarding the car's stunning appearance and urged potential buyers to bid with confidence, echoing sentiments of the car's beauty and desirability.
Neutral: @Ritgerd and @Rvanders raised valid questions regarding the vehicle's features and parts, particularly concerning the crank hubs and the car's carbon ceramic brakes. Meanwhile, @davidcarson48 inquired about the unique characteristics of the vehicle's temporary license plate. @mntsr sought clarification on the exhaust system components, asking whether the downpipes were stock or aftermarket, while @alokg questioned the implications of the vehicle being a Canadian car, highlighting some uncertainties regarding these specific features.
Negative: There were a few comments indicating concerns or issues. @rvanders noted the absence of the original carbon ceramic brakes in the vehicle while @Nate735 was disappointed to hear that the stock exhaust would not be included with the sale. Additionally, @jkessels_ expressed a wish for the model to have been offered in a manual transmission option, hinting at a desire for different driving experiences not currently available with the vehicle.
|
Supercharged 427-Powered 1968 Ford Mustang GT500CR 900S 6-Speed by Classic Recreations
8T01C176021
Lot 223136
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed great admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning aesthetics and impressive power. @Bmarcum referred to it as a beautiful car, while @Hoppy18 lauded the opening photo as stunning, capturing the powerful stance of the vehicle. @Mr_wbt described it as 'a badass rattle snake' due to the engine's performance, and many others, like @brasnick and @BigT77, echoed these sentiments by emphasizing its gorgeous design and powerful capabilities. The car's 900 horsepower was frequently mentioned as an exhilarating feature, with @NVGT350 calling it a 'bad mama jama' and several commentators wishing the seller luck with the auction.
Neutral: Various comments offered observations or inquiries regarding the car without expressing strong sentiments in either direction. Indeed, @trademark noted the front wheel geometry's alignment, while @ViperNC expressed interest in the engineering of the supercharger inquirer. Additionally, @Hoppy18 sought information about the estimated 0-60 mph time for potential bidders. @Klapan67 provided a technical note on the materials used in the vehicle's construction and their possible effect on visual appeal, indicating a more analytical perspective. The interactions between commenters also revealed a community engaged in technical discussions about the vehicle's design.
Negative: Some commentators voiced their dissatisfaction with the car's presentation or concept. @PatParks mentioned the perception of the vehicle as an overdone Eleanor clone, expressing a longing for originality in Mustang designs. @PC4x4 and @humvic echoed similar sentiments about the choice of materials used in the engine compartment, indicating disapproval of the bedliner finish. Furthermore, @erslll complained about the lack of comprehensive videos beyond sound clips, suggesting that the visual representation was lacking. Overall, while there was considerable appreciation for the car, these critiques highlighted the divide between enthusiasts and traditionalists in the car community.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express enthusiasm for the vehicle's unique design and aesthetic appeal. @AntiqueRadio finds the ammeter gauge labeled 'Dynamo' to be charming and cool, while @Mordizzle describes it as 'shag-olicious' and @GlenK playfully mentions its rocking exterior suggesting a fun vibe. @a410traveler admires its potential as an unusual limo, though humorously considers a hearse conversion with @Oldwizard32, highlighting the vehicle's versatility. Commenters appreciate aspects like the interior, with @Knuckles-R-Busted reminiscing about similar vintage features, and @crestfyre praising the overall artistic quality of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments pose questions regarding the vehicle's functionality and technical specifications. @DFLETCH4 inquires about whether the heating, air conditioning, and various gauges are operational, demonstrating a practical approach to assessing the vehicle. @Davey_Jones notes the presence of a thick tube in the design, seeking clarification on its function, which leads to a response from @Dreya (The Seller) regarding it being custom brake lines. General appreciation for the restoration and craftsmanship is shared, particularly by @wilsodh, who finds the condition since the 90s impressive but suggests some updates are needed.
Negative: Some comments indicate that certain aspects of the vehicle may not meet modern expectations. @wilsodh mentions that the interior feels dated and could use a refresh, hinting at the need for improvements, while also agreeing with others about the design needing a more robust stance. @DFLETCH4 repeatedly seeks assurance on specific operational features, indicating a hint of skepticism about the vehicle's functionality. Overall, the feedback isn't overwhelmingly negative, but points towards some areas the vehicle could improve to enhance its appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @gddoktr shares a highly positive experience, highlighting the thrilling performance and balance of the car, making it an excellent choice for both street and track driving. @AudiB9S4 also praises the visceral and spine-tingling driving sensation of his similar model, emphasizing the mid-engine sports cars' incredible capabilities. Additionally, @xman64 (The Seller) assures potential buyers of the car's maintenance, claiming it has never been on the track and was fully serviced upon purchase, along with the installation of new tags.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a need for more information about the vehicle's service history and condition. @Gobr1ell inquires about the build sheet, while @Jagerdjs and @nachob question the availability of a DME report and essential maintenance records. @kailua808 asks similarly about oils and services, indicating that there is a general curiosity about the car's history and current state, especially regarding its usage and past maintenance actions.
Negative: Negative sentiments are primarily centered around the lack of responsiveness from the seller and insufficient information regarding the car's condition. @dgl1325 mentions that the scarcity of information is a significant deterrent in considering the purchase, suggesting they are likely to pass on the offer. @bigdaddydriver expresses frustration with the seller's unresponsiveness, further criticizing the reliability of Porsche vehicles, reminiscing about a negative experience that has influenced their perception of the brand.
|
 |
Positive: @Masonpauls complimented the vehicle by describing it as a "great lookin car" and @12cilindriFF stated, "Looks like a nice one!" This positive feedback reflects an overall appreciation for the car's appearance. Additionally, @captainal, the seller, actively engages with potential buyers, answering queries regarding details about the vehicle, which fosters a sense of community and builds trust.
Neutral: Several comments are focused on inquiries related to the vehicle's specifications and registration process. For example, @MattFerrari asked about the differential and suspension, while @Benk9282 sought clarification on whether the vehicle can be registered in California. @captainal responded to these inquiries effectively, providing details about both the registration process and the car's engine specifications, such as its 302 block bored out to 347 stroker setup, which suggests that the vehicle has received serious consideration from potential buyers.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments about the vehicle; however, some potential concerns were raised. For instance, @exacta1 asked about fitting comfortably in the car, indicating some uncertainty about its ergonomics for taller individuals. Additionally, there was a moment of confusion regarding the vehicle's ignition system, as the seller clarified that there is both a toggle switch and an ignition key, which may indicate a lack of standardized features typically expected in vehicles.
|
Supercharged 2016 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Coupe 1LZ Z51
1G1YH2D76G5115206
Lot 223383
Private Party
 |
Positive: @SmokieJoe (The Seller) states that the vehicle is a fun car at a nice price. He emphasizes a detailed setup of the ProCharger kit which is specifically designed for performance, showcasing the car's potential. Additionally, he mentions that there are two keys available and shares a cold start video to reassure potential buyers about the car's starting condition.
Neutral: Several commenters acknowledge the car's appearance and low mileage while expressing concern about its condition. @MW4CarMan highlights its good looks but mentions it might not have been cared for properly. Others inquire about specific mechanical aspects, such as the AC compressor, which has led to a discussion about the costs associated with replacements, indicating that there are ongoing maintenance issues that need addressing.
Negative: Comments about the vehicle lean heavily towards its poor condition, with @Goldhawk_Auto pointing out rough elements including damaged wheels and tires, as well as a daunting lack of air conditioning, referencing expensive repair costs. @Prokill1 raises concerns about potential damage to the passenger rear rim, making it seem like more than just surface-level issues exist. Overall, there is a shared sentiment that the car requires significant attention and repairs, which might deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Greatwhite97 commented that the vehicle is "built for fun" and others echoed the excitement about driving it. @DisturbedS10 expressed nostalgia for the print catalogs associated with such vehicles, while @bringatrailer and @Todd_Z. reminisced about the iconic mid-90s prerunner builds and shared fond memories of similar vehicles. @gig101 praised the Toyota for its off-road capability and mentioned it being a joy to drive with its impressive steering and overall design. Moreover, @AdamGiglio007 (The Seller) provided detailed information about the pickup's performance, reassuring potential buyers about its excellent running condition and smooth operation of various components.
Neutral: @PalmSpringskid raised questions regarding the pickup's 4X4 capabilities, expressing concern about the accuracy of the listing, prompting @AdamGiglio007 (The Seller) to clarify that it is indeed a 2WD vehicle. Furthermore, @PalmSpringskid also inquired if the truck runs and requested video footage to confirm its condition, to which @AdamGiglio007 (The Seller) responded positively by offering to provide videos. The comments reflect a mix of inquiries seeking clear information about the truck's specifications and condition as well as some historical context regarding its use.
Negative: On the downside, @oldman83 pointed out a listing error regarding the truck's drive capability, noting it is not a 4X4, requiring @bringatrailer to amend the description. @PalmSpringskid, feeling misled, questioned whether he could retract his bid based on the earlier misrepresentation. The comments show some concern among potential buyers regarding the truck's specifications and its portrayal in the listing, indicating a need for clarity to maintain trustworthiness.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its unique Rosewood color with black stripes, and its overall aesthetic appeal. @Entzuckt praised the color combination and noted the car looked unmolested, while @Bayareachevelle appreciated its authenticity and rarity. Many others, including @DJordan442 and @Tobyallen, echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the car's beautiful design and its status as a legit LS5, encouraging the seller and noting the rarity of the color combination. The car was viewed as a standout example of a Chevelle, with numerous users commenting on the appreciation of its unique styling and features like the cowl induction system.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussion regarding the specifics of the car, such as production numbers and the condition of the engine and stamping pads. @ssterry provided insight into production figures for the LS5 engine while addressing concerns about potential issues with the stamp pad. There were inquiries from @Glide8410 and @68GTORamAir about the car's history and the rarity of the color. The seller, @HOUSEOFSTEEL, participated in these discussions, providing details about the car's original build and features, contributing to an informative exchange about the vehicle's background and specifications.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the engine stamping and authenticity, with some commenters, including @Djordan442, questioning the condition and accuracy of the stamp pad. @PonchoFan mentioned the poor quality of the photos provided by the seller, suggesting they did not do justice to the car's actual appearance. @Djordan442 also pushed for expert certification of the vehicle to alleviate doubts, while @whamm8 pointed out a potential clearcoat blemish. Overall, while the car garnered praise, these criticisms highlighted areas that could affect buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally praise the overall build quality and aesthetic of the Bronco, with @boaboyoz calling it a "pretty Portland Bronco" and @Clrprop noting it turned out very nice. @beer_and_fish expresses enthusiasm for having more Broncos on the road, regardless of the frames used, while @jg1313 appreciates the desirable construction work behind such a project. @Broncotime (The Seller) emphasizes the modern features integrated into the build such as the Coyote engine, improved suspension, and updated braking systems, arguing that these factors cater to customer demands for reliability and performance.
Neutral: Several commenters seek clarification on aspects of the Bronco's construction and titling process. @StevieF questions the originality of components, particularly regarding VINs and how they impact legal registration, while @syncroadventure shares concerns from past experiences with state inspections. @F1Jim64 challenges the validity of Marti reports for a vehicle he believes may not have true original certification, prompting @becarr21 to inquire if this is a first-time experience for him on the auction platform. The Seller provides detailed explanations regarding their process to adhere to state laws.
Negative: A few commenters express skepticism regarding the vehicle's originality and title legitimacy. @F1Jim64 criticizes the use of reproduction parts and questions the integrity of claiming a Marti report on a modified vehicle, suggesting it could lead to enforcement issues down the line. Some others mention the risks associated with aftermarket builds when it comes to state inspections and VIN validation, like @syncroadventure, who recounts challenges faced in California. @BuggerOff advises understanding the legal responsibilities of builders, which signals underlying concerns about transparency in such rebuilds. Overall, there are apprehensions about how well these builds align with legal and ethical standards.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and unique features. @Octaint described it as "Gorgeous!" while @GLWA referred to it as a "Sharp Stang!". @BigT77 appreciated the distinctive front and rear fascias, side skirts, and rear spoiler, alongside the choice of tungsten gray paint and proper transmission, showing a strong appreciation for its design and build quality.
Neutral: @tp1das, the seller, provided some informative background about the 2006 Saleen, mentioning that it is one of only 514 built and detailing his ownership since 2006. He offered details regarding the original window sticker and build sheet, confirming features like the axle ratio and warranty information. The seller's transparency about the vehicle's features and modifications, as well as answering questions about the wheels and the engine, contributed to a factual understanding of the car's specifications.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by commenters about the vehicle's condition and historic repairs. @grumpyoldjagdude inquired about paint bubbling that is visible in certain photos, which the seller attributed to a manufacturing defect that had been previously repaired. Furthermore, there was confusion regarding whether the car was supercharged, leading @glsdesigns to initially assume it was, before discovering that only half of the 2006 Saleens were supercharged, indicating that not all model expectations were met.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous commenters have expressed their admiration for the vehicle, referring to it as a "time capsule" and a "great ride." @lionsfan54 noted its low mileage, emphasizing it's not even broken in yet. @CRUSH highlighted the durability of the cloth seats and complimented the condition of the frame, showcasing potential interest in its overall quality and maintenance history. The seller, @jordanl6806, has confirmed that the vehicle has been meticulously cared for, having been purchased from the original owner's relative and maintained in great condition. Overall, the positive comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic and mechanical attributes.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history, reflecting a cautious curiosity. For instance, @Forrest27 inquired about the paint quality in specific pictures, while @Kent1 pointed out minor rust bubbles seen in a particular photo. @StraightNoChaser sought detailed information about the vehicle's exterior refinishing, including paint meter readings, and @jordanl6806, (The Seller) addressed these concerns by providing clarity on the maintenance and repairs that have been done. The seller's openness to questions and provision of additional details, like rust treatment, indicate a willingness to discuss the vehicle's condition openly.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, some comments conveyed concerns about potential issues. @justinhess questioned a leak around the rear main seal, signaling worries about long-term engine damage, while @red1997 pointed out that rear main seal leaks are common in this model and emphasized the risks posed by rust. This commentary suggests that while the vehicle has many appealing qualities, there are underlying issues that need addressing, particularly related to rust and maintenance. @jordanl6806 reassured prospective buyers, indicating that the leak was minor and typical for these vehicles, but the concerns raised indicate that some buyers may be cautious when considering the purchase.
|
10k-Mile 2019 Porsche 911 Targa 4 GTS Exclusive Manufaktur Edition
WP0BB2A92KS126086
Lot 223396
Dealer
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, describing the 991.2 Targa 4 GTS as "sublime and divine," with @boaboyoz emphasizing its beautiful build and wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @GDogg highlights the vehicle as exceptional and that it checks all the boxes, while @JHBBII compliments it with a "Chef's Kiss!" Additionally, @wws911s shares their experience owning one of the 88 models built for the USA, praising the quality of workmanship as a testament to the exclusive series.
Neutral: There are several inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifications and features. @shankdiesel asks for the window sticker and details about the driver's seat bolster repair. @Fede1983 inquires about delivery to Los Angeles and whether the vehicle has Apple CarPlay, which @Chefywannab confirms it does. @2Southwood requests information about cold start and roof operation videos, as well as details about the next major service. @JLRStPete, the seller, is actively responding to questions and providing information about the vehicle’s condition and features.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the vehicle's condition. @kars4dads points out potential stains on the upholstery and asks about visible wear, while @Josev8 requests clarification on the driver's seat's appearance, mentioning white spots or marks. @Dare1 expresses frustration over an additional charge demanded by the dealer after spending over $100k, labeling it a shame. Furthermore, there are queries regarding the vehicle's detailed service history and any available records, with particular attention to the state of the interior and possible imperfections.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters have positively noted the aesthetic appeal and condition of the GX470, praising it as an attractive example of the model. @308guru remarked that it showcases the best color combination, while @leedhambly described it as an absolute gorgeous specimen. @E_F_III and @Pristine4x4 highlighted the vehicle's low mileage and excellent service history. The thorough presentation and extensive photo listing have also earned admiration, with commenters appreciating the more than 600 photos provided by the seller. Additionally, @Pristine4x4, who is the seller, expressed confidence in the truck's quality, emphasizing that the Southern ownership and meticulous reconditioning ensure a satisfactory experience for the new owner.
Neutral: Commenters have expressed a range of neutral inquiries regarding specific features and conditions of the GX470. @Polliocean raised a question about the vehicle's KDSS feature, while @Avk64 inquired about maintenance specifics, such as the completion of the timing belt and water pump replacement. They were informed that all necessary maintenance was indeed completed prior to sale, with detailed receipts available for verification. @Boomer54 sought clarification about a duplicate title issue, and @AD360 asked if the vehicle had any residual odors, both of which were addressed by the seller without indicating any significant concerns.
Negative: On the more critical side, some comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @srhashimi noted that living in a snow-prone area could have taken a toll on the body, suggesting possible rust issues, although this was countered by @peterx who found it to be quite clean. Despite the seller explaining that surface rust was minimal and the vehicle had undergone extensive reconditioning, some skepticism remained about the costs incurred in restoring an older vehicle like this Lexus. @India0269 expressed disbelief at the high investment put into the vehicle, questioning whether such extensive repairs were typical for vehicles of this age, suggesting a potential negative perception of the necessity of such reconditioning.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the truck, calling it beautiful and a great-looking ride. @JustaGlitch exclaimed, "LOVE it!!" while @gmagno and @OGChuy highlighted its impressive build and aesthetics. @Oaksider and @allmotorb praised the truck's overall look and condition, noting that such models are rare in today's market. @Todd_Z. appreciated the upgrade in the steering pump, further enhancing the positive feedback surrounding the vehicle's quality and performance. Additionally, the seller, @EdwinsGarage, shared photos from the restoration process and emphasized the impressive state of the truck following its renovations, reinforcing the positive perspective of potential buyers.
Neutral: A few comments included requests for additional details regarding the truck, such as current mileage after rebuilding and photographic evidence of specific parts, like the interior or the dashboard. For instance, @Careymoulton asked about the mileage on the rebuild, while @davebrokins sought clarity on noise levels observed in a video and the effectiveness of the vehicle's heating and cooling systems. The seller, @EdwinsGarage, responded transparently about the condition and functionalities, confirming that the truck's cooling system was updated and functioned well, while also addressing the mileage uncertainty due to lack of documentation.
Negative: Some comments contained questions about aspects of the truck that suggested areas for improvement. @gmagno pointed out the screws on the gauge bezel, hinting at a lack of attention to detail in the build. @Factory4 noted the apparent rear lift imbalance, suggesting that a trac bar drop bracket was needed for stability. @davebrokins raised concerns about potential rattling noises during a drive and inquired about smells in the cabin, implying that further adjustments or inspections might be required. Additionally, @cporto49 questioned whether the truck would meet California's smog regulations, which could indicate a potential hurdle for interested local buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Several users praised the vehicle for its unique color combination, exceptional handling, and overall beauty. @Bauback described it as a 'nice rare red soft top' that is well cared for, suggesting it would drive home in style. @Quackbury highlighted its qualities as a back roads carver, complimenting the balance, power, and steering feel. The seller, @avassigh, also emphasized the car's aesthetic appeal, noting how pictures don't do justice to its beauty and detailing upcoming enhancements made to the vehicle, including new tires and a state-of-the-art infotainment system.
Neutral: Comments reflected a mix of curiosity and requests for additional information. @RS60Spyder expressed interest in the final auction price and mentioned features like the hardtop and audio system. @GoBoGo raised questions about some metal items seen in the trunk, prompting the seller to clarify that these were components of a hardtop stand. Additionally, @JessicaM inquired about discoloration noticed on the trunk lid, leading to confirming reassurances about minor cosmetic issues from the seller, who referenced a video walkthrough explaining these aspects.
Negative: Some comments also raised concerns regarding the aesthetic condition of the vehicle. @JessicaM initially could not see the discoloration mentioned, and @architraz speculated that the presence of a Carvana license plate frame may have negatively affected bidding. @Kcir and others requested more detailed information about the car's features and updates, indicating a desire for more transparency without dissatisfaction. The seller acknowledged these concerns, ensuring all service records would be passed along to the buyer to provide confidence in the vehicle's condition.
|
2018 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter Sportsmobile Camper Conversion
WD3PE7CD5JP618960
Lot 223401
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Mikeura and @RJRambler complimented the vehicle's clean build and minimalist design, suggesting that it is an appealing camper overall. @eminard mentioned the vehicle's versatility, noting that it could accommodate more than the expected two people for sleeping, enhancing the camping experience. Overall, positive remarks highlight the vehicle’s aesthetic appeal and its suitability for camping trips.
Neutral: @eminard provided detailed responses to potential buyers, answering questions about the vehicle’s dimensions and features such as the bed setup and insulation. The vehicle is described as having some bare metal visible on the inside, indicating it may not be ideal for cold weather camping but has ample space and practical features. The communication about adding additional photos and dimensions demonstrates an effort to clarify the vehicle’s condition and usability.
Negative: @Sacksenheim raised a question about the seating capacity in relation to sleeping arrangements, indicating potential confusion. @OneOfEach expressed concerns about the quality of professional photographs, citing specific images that detracted from the overall presentation. Additionally, @Dkern2 and others inquired about possible water leaks and maintenance records, indicating some doubts about the vehicle’s reliability and fit for specific camping needs.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz praised the 992.1 S coupe, highlighting its beautiful Gentian Blue Metallic build and expressing good luck wishes to potential bidders. @RedArcadia also commented on the appealing color combination of the vehicle. @GDogg appreciated the gorgeous Graphite Blue interior, adding best wishes to the auction participants. @1Mooncreek admired the overall look of the car and questioned about the condition of a scuff on the leather door panel, adding to the positive outlook on the vehicle's aesthetics.
Neutral: @rsautohaus, the seller, welcomed potential bidders to the auction and encouraged them to ask questions. They provided clarity regarding the condition of the vehicle, addressing inquiries about paint protection film (PPF), the original window sticker, and the Georgia title status. They also shared information about the car's paint readings and made additional efforts to satisfy bidder inquiries, including providing videos and responsive communication.
Negative: However, some comments raised concerns. @RTR18 requested a close-up photo of a scuff on the rear wheel well, seeking reassurance on the vehicle's condition. @TimBuckToo_2 criticized the clarity of the photo focusing on an indentation in the leather trim, suggesting that the photography lacked technical attention. The comment from @01996tt expressed strong negative sentiments about the exterior color, characterizing it as undesirable. Additionally, the term "replacement title" sparked a question from @newusername about its implications, indicating potential concerns about the car's history.
|
 |
Positive: @acharlson (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a "Gorgeous ML350" that drives excellently. The car has new tires, a new battery, and recent oil and filter changes, supported by extensive documentation including a clean Carfax report. The seller emphasizes that it is a non-smoker car with no odors and states the car was well-maintained, having received all required services. Additional feedback highlights that the vehicle is very capable off-road and has a reputation for reliability, as noted by @gritsandbourbon who shares their positive experience with a similar model.
Neutral: Some buyers are requesting additional information and images, such as @itstimech, who asks for pictures of the complete underside due to concerns about rust, especially since the car originates from West Virginia where salt is used in winter. @Moe2635 also requests videos of cold startup and driving, while @strongcoffee inquires about the adjustability of the second-row seats. The seller has responded positively to most inquiries, indicating that videos have been added and clarifying that the back seats do not recline or move forward and back.
Negative: There are some discrepancies and concerns raised by potential buyers like @DukeDog1, who questions the car's origin, stating it appears to be from West Virginia rather than Virginia as claimed. They also point out a potential issue with the listed tire date codes being outdated. Additionally, @oldemangarrett notes a typo regarding the wheel size. These comments reflect challenging aspects for the seller as they navigate clarifications regarding the vehicle's condition and provenance.
|
 |
Positive: @Sam_K describes the car as a nice little vehicle, pointing out that its uncommon black color enhances its visual appeal, suggesting that painting the wheels in the correct black and white would make it stand out even more. @StarliteMotorcars (The Seller) emphasizes the car's solid and honest condition, hailing it as one of the finest '68 Beetles to come to market and inviting questions from interested buyers. @milage appreciates its aesthetics despite disliking the wheel color. @VWTony shares nostalgic feelings about the sound of the engine, recalling a personal connection to similar models.
Neutral: @Sunroof expresses that although they typically favor pre-67 VWs, the beautiful design of this particular black/red '68 could draw them in, indicating it might instill a new appreciation for the model. They hope it receives the recognition it deserves. @StarliteMotorcars (The Seller) engages with inquiries about the car's engine, providing details about maintenance done under current ownership, effectively reassuring potential buyers about its performance. There are also comments regarding adjustments needed for starting the car, which @StarliteMotorcars (The Seller) clarifies, indicating that it starts easily when not left idle for long.
Negative: @mick59 voices disappointment about how the Beetle was altered to comply with US regulations, suggesting these changes diminished its iconic charm. @milage notes the wheels are hideous and references an unnecessary fuel filter in the engine bay. @LouFifer and @VWTony discuss potential issues with the car's starting mechanism, implying that there are flaws that might need attention despite others praising the vehicle. This indicates a divide in perceptions about the car's operational quality.
|
 |
Positive: @BigT77 expressed admiration for the motorcycle's aesthetics, particularly the cool graphics and the ape-hanger handlebars, hinting at their intriguing history. @Torchbearer complimented the quality of a riding video, suggesting it effectively countered negative opinions about the bike. @99duelly described the motorcycle as an interesting build, giving it modern chopper status even for a 1997 model, and acknowledged the visual appeal of the ape-hanger bars when riding straight.
Neutral: @evire64 inquired about the bike's suitability for beginners, while @Klby72 (The Seller) clarified that it is not the best option for novice riders. @Knappster asked about the bike's length, receiving a straightforward response about its axle-to-axle measurement from @Klby72 (The Seller). @RangerKaye's curiosity about gauge availability was met with mixed replies, as @Torchbearer humorously said that raising hell doesn't require gauges, in contrast to @Klby72 (The Seller)'s confirmation that there are no gauges, only a tube for fuel level.
Negative: @P0rsche956 brought up concerns about needing physical adaptations to ride comfortably, indicating potential issues with the bike's ergonomics. @GLWA pointed out the bike's style, but voiced a desire for more skull motifs, which might reflect a sense of dissatisfaction with its design elements. Overall, there was a subtle undercurrent of skepticism regarding the practicality of the motorcycle, especially for newcomers to biking.
|
 |
Positive: The 2002 F-250 is equipped with a robust 7.3L Diesel V8 Turbo engine, paired with the 4R100 4-speed automatic transmission which is factory original according to @Buddys503 and @Manual_Driver. The truck's production details listed denote a solid build quality, with specifications confirming it is designed for utility, including a proper tire size and trailer tow prep pack as highlighted in the detailed vehicle specifications by @newcarpro. The considerations for its towing capabilities have been addressed with the discussion on gearing, showing attentiveness to the vehicle's performance characteristics.
Neutral: Various users like @Jbbylund86 and @kubotaorange76 confirm that the vehicle specifications regarding the transmission and engine are accurate, clarifying factory configurations. Additionally, @ramble59 raises a valid point regarding the axle ratio; there's a discussion around whether the gearing is optimal for towing. Clearly, the community is engaged in ensuring that the information provided for potential buyers is thorough and accurate, as demonstrated by @bringatrailer updating the listing after feedback.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the truck's towing capacity due to its gearing of 3:55, mentioned by @ramble59, suggesting it is less than ideal for heavy towing situations compared to the standard ratios. @DefenseEngineer is also inquiring about cold-weather winterization, indicating potential doubts about the vehicle's performance in harsher conditions, while @Bduzzle12 questions its compliance with California smog regulations, potentially raising red flags for those looking to purchase it in states with stringent environmental laws.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and restoration. @TonyDiet described it as a fantastic car and anticipated watching the auction end. @HellcatNation shared fond memories of a similar car and praised its beauty. @vedipus and @kc86ta complimented the extensive work put into the suspension and overall appearance, noting it looks fresh and well-built. @MartinE88 referred to it as gorgeous and highlighted the effort seen in the restoration process, suggesting that it would be a lovely addition for the right owner. Other users, such as @wpavlik2 and @shmeliov, also echoed admiration, calling it beautiful and wishing the seller the best in the auction.
Neutral: The seller, @Obiewab, provided insights into the vehicle's history and condition, discussing its purchase in 2022 and the restoration efforts undertaken over three years. He mentioned that the car was brought back from Vancouver and underwent a mechanical refresh, with many details available for interested buyers. Several inquiries were made by users regarding specifics about the engine and its components, such as @TJJust asking about the engine code and mileage, and @LawDdaw inquiring about potential sale limitations to US buyers. The seller clarified that the vehicle is available for import into the US as it is over 25 years old and pledged to assist with the logistics for the successful bidder.
Negative: Some users pointed out areas for improvement regarding the car's presentation. @Diamond_Dave commented that the seats appeared to be cloth and vinyl rather than leather, adding a note of caution. @ACR raised concerns about the vehicle's graphics and wheel color, suggesting that these elements should be corrected for authenticity. @KingCast lamented the loss of his own similar car due to an accident and expressed frustration, while @kujiwara noted the car's minimal rust was a highlight, indicating that it was well-maintained prior to restoration. Overall, while the comments were largely positive, there were valid critiques regarding authenticity and details that needed attention.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the 2005 VW Touareg V8 as a clean and well-kept vehicle with low mileage, praised for its solid build quality and powerful 4.2L V8 engine. @CrisB describes it as a hard-to-find great car, suitable for both on and off-road conditions and without the concerns linked to other models like the V10 Diesel. @RevvinMotors (The Seller) emphasizes its comfort, classic styling, and reliability as a winter SUV or a strong utility vehicle, encouraging potential buyers to bid confidently on this well-maintained example of German engineering. Enthusiasts like @packardv8 and @Santi97 express their appreciation for the performance and rarity of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters shared informative remarks, discussing the evolution of the Touareg in comparison to other models. @myoldcut raised a thought-provoking question about why the V8 version was discontinued, while @Yoshicruiser offered historical context on VW's strategy shift under Porsche's influence. Questions about the vehicle's condition, such as brake components and recalls, were posed by users like @jnkpro12 and @COO, with @RevvinMotors providing responses and reassurance about the vehicle's overall maintenance and any potential issues.
Negative: Despite the positive notes, there were some concerns about reliability and specific condition issues shared by users. @packardv8 mentioned past experiences with fragile components in VW group vehicles, suggesting caution regarding longevity, although they still find driving the Touareg enjoyable. @jnkpro12 and @Kutya pointed out concerns about the interior's condition, with mentions of the headliner and stains, which @RevvinMotors acknowledged but stated would not be repaired before the sale. These drawbacks prompted skepticism about maintenance and present condition from some commenters.
|
 |
Positive: @Bigenca describes the vehicle as a "beautiful original Hatchback" and sees its potential as a sleeper car, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @WCG praises the Nova for its appearance, suggesting it looks like it just came out of a 1973 Chevy sales brochure. @Dollycat3 shares admiration for the car's color and interior, while @Oldnfast expresses surprise at discovering the hatchback version and compliments its fantastic color. @Ty2219 mentions it as a cool optioned car, and @ThunderRob appreciates the orange paint, affirming a connection with the car due to previous ownership of similar Novas.
Neutral: The seller, @NovaOriginal73, shares details about the car's history, noting it has been in their family since new and has always been well maintained. In response to comments about the overheating issue, they assert the car has never broken down, simply needing a cool-off during summer shows. Many commenters express curiosity regarding the original color and options, with @RallyDave and @G-ManZ15 providing insights into the trimming options available for Novas at the time. @WIZZZZ asks about the radiator and thermostat's replacement, while others request more detailed pictures and information about rust areas, reflecting interest in the car's condition.
Negative: Several commenters raise concerns about the overheating issue, with @Bowtienut questioning the conditions under which overheating occurs and @WheelZ63 criticizing the lack of adequate solutions provided by manufacturers for such problems. @Mordizzle suggests the SS emblem should be removed from the listing, indicating that it may misrepresent the car's true specifications. @CarFoolLane questions how overheating was observed without a temperature gauge, while @pjh4064 expresses doubt over the paint's originality and requests more detailed pictures to clarify inconsistencies. Additionally, @TheCritic shares a personal experience of water leakage and rust issues in similar models, urging for photos to address the potential problem areas.
|
 |
Positive: The car is presented well with excellent quality photos showing various angles, which many commenters appreciate. @Antoniofal expressed gratitude for the extensive visual documentation. Additionally, @Johnenqqqqqq praised the car and mentioned it has been a great vehicle, indicating a positive personal experience with it. The seller, @MohrImports, promises to provide more updates and is proactive in responding to questions, further adding to a positive impression of transparency and customer service.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on specific details regarding the car's history and condition. @ashmanfish raised concerns about the reported Carfax damage related to clearcoat failure and questioned why it was reported to insurance if it was a minor issue. @akwithabeamonit inquired about the suspension setup, while others pointed out a noticeable clunk sound during driving, prompting @MohrImports to confirm that they would provide additional information after further inspection.
Negative: There were notable criticisms regarding the seller's responsiveness and communication, particularly from @pohara, who was frustrated by a lack of prompt answers and follow-through on the offered pre-purchase inspection. This concern was echoed by others who felt that the seller's communication issues could deter potential buyers. @revtenn speculated that noises from the car might indicate a mechanical issue like a failing motor mount, raising further concerns about the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Flashpix commented that the truck is attractive in green and appreciates its imperfections, stating it would be fine for practical uses like hauling mulch. @Sacramennah praised the seller's expertise with ADPU’s in Northern California. @dagmar82 highlighted the truck's authenticity, mentioning it’s presented as originally designed without unwanted modifications, giving positive feedback on the overall presentation.
Neutral: @KOBattalin-Fritz asked if the truck runs and requested pictures of it starting and running, indicating some curiosity about its functionality. @acett mentioned that the 6-cylinder engine known for durability would look good on a vineyard or ranch. @Tom (The Seller) provided several detailed explanations regarding the truck's history, including that it’s lived in Northern California, addressed the condition of the wood bed, and reassured potential buyers of its reliability.
Negative: @FuriousFurball questioned @dagmar82's comment on the wood bed's condition, suggesting it was rotten and raising concerns about the reliability of described features. @dagmar82 clarified their earlier comment to argue against trendy modifications, implying that any such changes would be detrimental. @Tom (The Seller) acknowledged the truck's imperfections while noting that it still has usability, but users should be cautious of its age and condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting its appeal and condition. @Tonybalony shows strong interest in the R107 model, indicating a desire to purchase it in the future. @Patioboater notes their surprise at the lack of bids for such a nice car, emphasizing its desirability. @AliStJohn and @amolpatil appreciate the car's good looks and suggest further enhancing the listing with more photos and videos, which could potentially attract more buyers.
Neutral: @ScubaDuck (The Seller) provides detailed information about the vehicle's condition and features. They mention that the dash is in fair condition and that the car runs and drives great, recently having been serviced. They also explain the reason behind the absence of bids and mention that they are trying to address the issue of picture uploads. Comments from others, including requests for more images and clarification on the soft top and videos, suggest the buyers' interest while also pointing out some questions that remain.
Negative: Some commenters express confusion about the lack of bidding on the vehicle, with @alanmannino directly questioning if there are any faults that need to be addressed, reflecting skepticism about the car's desirability in the market. This sentiment is echoed by @Patioboater, who questions why an appealing car like this has not received any bids, indicating a concern about the listing's effectiveness. @scubaduck (The Seller) shares their frustration regarding the bidding situation, suggesting doubts about the platform's management.
|
 |
Positive: @johnnyvett highlighted the charm of the classic 1974 model, complimenting its features and wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @Handsofstone pointed out the appeal of the C3 Corvette's front wheel well bulges and noted that the car is generally easy to work on, making it a great classic. @Siowner praised the car's restored condition and the practicality of the t-top, indicating that it would be a desirable choice among newer Corvette owners. @DrDick appreciated the integrity of the car and encouraged the inclusion of the luggage rack, as it adds value and functionality.
Neutral: @BigT77 sought clarification regarding the car's mileage prior to restoration and expressed curiosity about its restoration timeline. @Ektl6900 shared a personal experience of purchasing a Corvette, thanking @johnnyvett for their knowledge and support. @LarryCorvette reminisced about their past Corvette experience, commenting that while the luggage rack may not be aesthetically pleasing, it serves a practical purpose for carrying items during travels. @Berend15 raised questions about the restoration details and operational status of the vehicle.
Negative: @PhilthyAnimal expressed a strong dislike for the luggage racks on Corvettes, prompting a response from @BigT77, who acknowledged the existence of differing opinions about the racks. @Ektl6900 received some pushback from commenters who had reservations about the number of questions posed about the vehicle. @johnnydVette12345 inquired about the specifics of the engine refresh, suggesting some skepticism regarding the restoration's thoroughness based on the lack of detailed answers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express excitement and admiration for the vehicle, noting its potential and desirability. @Kinco05 acknowledges the hard work put into building the truck and shares sympathy for its mechanical issues. @BroncoRider also appreciates the vehicle's build quality and the attention it garnered, highlighting its appeal as a smog-exempt classic in places like California. Overall, these comments reflect a shared appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic and engineering.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about the vehicle's mechanical history and specific issues, indicating interest in understanding the background of the Bronco. @syncroadventure seeks clarification on the truck's non-functioning status and the condition of the rebuilt engine. Questions about mileage before and after the rebuild, along with requests for photos of specific areas, suggest that people are gathering information to assess the vehicle's value and condition.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the vehicle's mechanical state, particularly the engine's overheating and eventual seizing. @stevenbrooten questions the seller about the nature of the overheating and the presence of a temp sending unit, implying doubt about the reliability of the seller's account. @Grodx1 inquires about rust in critical areas, indicating that potential buyers are cautious about hidden issues that could affect the vehicle's condition and longevity.
|
 |
Positive: @Jwolfgangk (The Seller) describes the vehicle as an exceptionally smooth and quiet ride for an RV, highlighting that it has never been fully used or had any stains or odo issues. @Dollycat3 praises the beautiful design details and layout of the rig, while @Jammer66 and @MarkTheSharkNYC acknowledge the vehicle's appearance and layout. @atlshaver shares a personal experience of the comfort in the sleeping arrangement, stating it's comfortable and has features like a mattress pad available for additional comfort, which appeals to potential buyers. Overall, the comments reflect a strong appreciation for the quality and aesthetics of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several potential buyers ask practical questions about the vehicle's specifications, including @kobus inquiring about towing capacity and @Cdillabaugh asking about the total height, which @Jwolfgangk (The Seller) confirms as 9'11" with a towing capacity of 7500 pounds. Also, @Skap44 seeks bed dimensions and @gude questions the presence of leveling jacks. @ImBATmanNoImBatMan raises a query about the functionality of the rear table and the suitability of child seat installations in the back row, demonstrating a general interest in the vehicle's utilities and family-friendliness.
Negative: Concerns emerge regarding the vehicle's handling and service history. @gude probes about the condition of the tires, revealing prior issues with alignment and blowouts. Even though @Jwolfgangk (The Seller) explains the tire issues, potential buyers might perceive this as a red flag regarding maintenance. Additionally, @DSall expresses doubts about the comfort of the bed system due to its design, questioning the snug fit of seatbelts and cushions. The overall sentiment hints at a need for more reassurances regarding the vehicle's reliability and features.
|
 |
Positive: @Reverend_Al expresses enthusiasm for the color of the bike, stating they love a black Hayabusa. @nexusautobrokers shares excitement with a straightforward 'BUSA!!!!!!!!!!!', while @BigT77 amusingly refers to the Hayabusa's reputation with a catchy acronym suggesting it brings excitement, indicating a fondness for the bike. These comments demonstrate a clear appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and performance characteristics.
Neutral: @BigT77 raises a practical question regarding the bike's low mileage, inquiring about the condition of its fluids following the recent replacement of the tires. Another comment from @shayne1 reflects knowledge from past ownership of a Hayabusa and hints at the bike's impressive speed, specifically mentioning the thrill of hitting 130MPH in third gear. These comments suggest an understanding of the bike's performance and maintenance considerations, fostering a balanced view.
Negative: While there are no outright negative comments, @BigT77's mention that the bike is not collectible implies a certain level of skepticism regarding its value as an investment. Additionally, the mention of low mileage prompts questions about maintenance that could cast doubt on the bike's history and reliability, indicating concerns that potential buyers may want to consider.
|
 |
Positive: @CarFanatic1 (The Seller) describes the vehicle as being in exceptional condition, emphasizing that it is one of the best available. The presentation of the car has garnered positive remarks, particularly from @E_F_III who appreciates the color variety beyond the typical black, white, or silver options. Additionally, @marathon_boy complimented the aesthetic appeal of the car, noting the attractiveness of the colors and the incorporation of OEM AMG wheels, which were acknowledged by @CarFanatic1 as a quality enhancement.
Neutral: Several comments raised questions about the vehicle's ownership history. @SAguy expressed curiosity about the fact that the car had had four previous owners despite its low mileage, which he found strange. @Verman72 also inquired about the car's service history records and the ownership documentation, to which @CarFanatic1 explained that the car had been owned by one family, leading to the multiple owner entries due to internal transfers. @Darkstar0821 asked whether the car had been a non-smoker vehicle, a detail that @CarFanatic1 confirmed by stating there were no tobacco odors present, supported by images of the factory fresh ashtrays.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's ownership history and service records. @SAguy questioned why none of the four previous owners retained the car despite its low mileage, while @Verman72 pointed out the lack of clarity surrounding the service history. Such inquiries may imply a lack of trust or transparency regarding the vehicle's background. There is an underlying skepticism in these comments that could affect potential buyers' confidence in the auction.
|
19×9″ and 19×11″ Dymag Carbon-Fiber and Magnalium Wheels for Porsche
Four Carbon-Fiber & Magnalium Wheels
Lot 223429
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their enthusiasm for the Dymag wheels and Pirelli tires being auctioned. @P0rsche956 particularly highlighted the significant weight savings these wheels offer compared to forged ones, noting how this contributed to better handling on imperfect surfaces. @w900matt shared excitement about the wheel specifications, suggesting they would suit his Turbo well, and jokingly remarked on the seller's extensive collection of vehicles, indicating a positive engagement with the seller and the product. Additionally, @A4guy appreciated the detailed responses about fitment, showing a strong interest in the wheels.
Neutral: The seller, @savethewheelsplz, provided detailed information about the wheels' specifications, compatibility with various Porsche models, and options for color refinishing. They also addressed questions from potential buyers regarding shipping costs, fitment issues, and the possibility of dismounting the tires if the buyer preferred only the wheels. These interactions suggested a willingness to clarify concerns and engage with potential buyers, providing a transparent and informative selling process.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the age and condition of the tires, with @wolfgang1 questioning the potential for air pressure loss due to reported issues with earlier Dymag models. Another commenter, @Hudjim, pointed out a DOT date code that indicated the tires could be quite old, leading to worries about their usability. This skepticism was echoed by @wolfgang1's reservations about paying shipping for tires deemed old and potentially unusable, which could cast a shadow on the overall value of the offer.
|
 |
Positive: @Nashvegas expressed admiration for the unique color combination of the Porsche 911, noting the rarity of the two-toned interior in early models. @Clloyd98 shared his enthusiasm for the classic style of the vehicle and is eager to see the auction's outcome. @campodf also praised the dreamy color combination, particularly in the scenic setting of the Pacific Ocean, which contributes to the car's appeal. @MohrImports highlighted that this auction is part of their 'Pacific Porsche Collection,' emphasizing the car's beauty and connection to their coastal dealership experience. Several comments reflect positivity towards the car's specifications and overall aesthetics.
Neutral: @jscifres raised inquiries about specific features and the power steering, suggesting a mix of excitement and uncertainty about some aspects. @Ida2Cal's request for insight into the owner's reason for selling the car indicates an interest in the car's history, while @mikepelly and @jscifres sought further details regarding paint imperfections and requested high-resolution images to assess the car's condition. This reflects a balanced approach to understanding the vehicle, as commenters aim to gather more detailed information for consideration.
Negative: Concerns were voiced by @dano517 regarding the unresolved SRS light issue, questioning the reliability of the earlier repairs made in August 2025, which could affect potential buyers. @BoogPowell requested clarification on specific repairs noted in the gallery, pointing out a lack of transparency regarding the work done on the vehicle. Furthermore, @jscifres expressed dissatisfaction with the responses to paint damage inquiries, indicating that not all concerns were effectively addressed, which could deter potential interest in the car.
|
 |
Positive: @YennaM praises the vehicle, describing it as the 'last year of the legendary bulletproofed International Harvester 7.3IDI turbo diesel', calling it a 'GEM of a RIG' and wishing the seller good luck. @59FUELIEIMPALA (The Seller) responds positively, acknowledging the significance of the engine and asserting its superior performance compared to other engines they have owned. @Martinft expresses interest in the truck, noting its well-cared-for condition and the impressive mileage of 30k in a short period, indicating that it appears to be a valuable vehicle.
Neutral: @bat questions if the vehicle features a 4-speed overdrive transmission, prompting an informative response from @59FUELIEIMPALA (The Seller), who clarifies the truck has a factory 4-speed with an added Gear Vendors overdrive. @HotrodV840 adds historical context by noting that 5-speed manuals were introduced in 1988 and discusses the advantages of the Gear Vendors unit. Additionally, @bryndinhartman inquires about the original headlights and tail lights, to which @59FUELIEIMPALA (The Seller) explains that the current lights are superior to the original versions available on eBay.
Negative: @obsfordguy mentions that the truck is not a true Centurion Conversion but a third-party conversion, which may affect its perceived authenticity. There is some confusion about the vehicle's documentation, with @bringatrailer addressing @59FUELIEIMPALA (The Seller) regarding a mistakenly included invoice for another vehicle. Furthermore, @Ordinaire's question about calculating the mileage per gallon implies a lack of clear information related to fuel efficiency in the ad, which could be seen as a negative aspect of the selling points.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, particularly highlighting its stunning appearance and meticulous maintenance by the seller, @dj_walls2424. @Masonpauls called it a great Cobra and expressed confidence in purchasing from @dj_walls2424, stating that only well-prepared vehicles are listed for sale. @Toddh03 echoed this sentiment, commending @dj_walls2424's extensive inspection process and indicating a willingness to pay more for a car represented by him due to the assurance of quality. Commenters also admired the unique Sunset Red color of the vehicle, with @Hulk2000 describing it as 'gorgeous' and @StuM noting its beauty resembling a Superformance model.
Neutral: @dj_walls2424, the seller, provided detailed information about the vehicle's title status, responding to inquiries about why it has a rebuilt/salvage brand on its title. He assured potential buyers that the title is clean and clear, explaining that the designation is a typical classification for replicas in Ohio without any negative history associated with it. In response to questions about the vehicle's features, including whether a soft top is included, @dj_walls2424 informed interested parties that while the car didn't come with one, he could provide a spare from another model for the winner of the auction.
Negative: Some commenters expressed confusion and concern regarding the title designation and its implications. @LBA1215 and @nine11c2 questioned the legitimacy and title classification, with @nine11c2 highlighting concerns over potential insurability due to the rebuilt/salvage designation. @P51 also pointed out the significance of the year of manufacture for emissions requirements. Overall, while there was significant praise for the vehicle and trust in the seller, there were lingering doubts regarding the title and how it might affect ownership experiences.
|
 |
Positive: The VW T4 Transporter Westfalia, also known as a California, has been highly praised for its condition and performance. @Abutenhof (The Seller) shared their joy of owning and using the vehicle for camping over the past five years, portraying the van as a source of happiness and adventure. Commenters @waspman and @RoundHeadlights referenced their own positive experiences with similar Volkswagen models, highlighting the solid construction of the van and commending the seller for providing detailed photos of the pop-top tent, which is usually overlooked in other listings. Overall, many expressed excitement about the opportunity to own such a well-maintained example of a beloved camper.
Neutral: Several comments provided additional details about the vehicle's specifications and maintenance history. @ProfGriff noted the rarity of diesel-powered Westfalias in North America and shared his own experience, emphasizing the reliability of the powertrain. @Benalfa inquired about the clutch's status and the performance of the van in city and highway conditions, while @nikhilg raised questions about the condition of the pop-top and its seals. @Abutenhof (The Seller) responded to these questions transparently, confirming the oil leak repair and describing the van's driving performance, noting its capability on highways and in city traffic.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle’s functionality, particularly regarding the refrigerator, which @nikhilg noted was not cooling properly, and the oil leak previously identified in service records, mentioned by @singlecross. Though @Abutenhof (The Seller) addressed these issues by confirming repairs and transparency in the service records, there was some apprehension expressed about the vehicle's overall reliability. Additionally, @waspman pointed out that not having a title could complicate the registration process in certain states, suggesting potential hurdles for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: This vehicle has garnered a lot of praise from various enthusiasts in the comments. @boaboyoz described it as a beautiful Bel Air, while @mike_rockwell expressed admiration for the quality restoration and historical significance of the build, particularly mentioning its polished trim and functional vintage air system. @cameokid (The Seller) highlighted that everything works properly down to the accessory GM flashers, reinforcing the car's excellent condition, a sentiment echoed by multiple commenters who are impressed with its aesthetics and features.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed curiosity about the finer details of the vehicle, such as @jb987 questioning the absence of a trim tag photo and @Olbugger inquiring about the power steering system. @TXDesFox asked about the rear seat lap belts and the possibility of a long-distance drive after purchase, while @bkoz52 suggested that the car should be driven rather than just showcased. The seller, @cameokid, responded to several questions with clarifications, including confirming the vehicle's capability for a drive and addressing potential concerns about the rear end gears and the state of the door panel.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns or criticism about specific features of the vehicle. @Olbugger pointed out the lack of power steering, expressing surprise and seeking clarification on other wiring features, while @bkoz52 disagreed with regarding the car as too nice to drive, stating that classic cars are meant to be driven. Fears about electrical or mechanical issues were raised by @braoley, who requested details on known imperfections or defects, which @cameokid (The Seller) addressed by stating he was unaware of any defects, potentially downplaying concerns from commenters.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg describes the vehicle as a testament to the quality and quintessential build of the Rolls Royce marque, commending its luxurious excellence. @Dollycat3 praises the elegant and glamorous design of the 25/30 Sedanca de Ville, highlighting its incredible styling and heritage. @Knuckles-R-Busted mentions that the interior is fit for royalty, calling it nicer than most homes, and appreciates the craftsmanship that reflects high-end furniture standards.
Neutral: @GiuseppeCamelio (The Seller) provides clarifications regarding the vehicle's features, correcting some details about the pinstripes and steering wheel design. They also address inquiries from @kevingd about the car's history and maintenance, noting its impeccable service history. @Colt1911 shares insights into the car’s provenance, stating its notable past ownership and connection to renowned automotive events, contributing positively to its value.
Negative: @Sparrownaut laments that Rolls-Royce may never achieve the same quality under BMW's ownership, hinting at a perceived decline in standards. @boaboyoz sarcastically compares the vehicle to Auric Goldfinger's Phantom, suggesting it may not hold the same prestige despite its fine construction. @Chasmiami-1 inquires about mechanical issues, indicating a concern regarding reliability, although @GiuseppeCamelio assures there are no current problems.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the unique design and nostalgia surrounding the vehicle, recognizing its connection to the classic "Andy Griffith Show." @Blake1995 even suggests it should win Most Unique on BaT, and @Otto2otto enjoys the surprise element of unique vehicles found on the platform. @rpcreager is intrigued by the sheer number of lights attached to the car, showcasing the distinct design choices made by the seller, @Maxsells (The Seller), who made this car a fun arts and crafts project.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the specifics of the vehicle's design and functionality. @Maxsells (The Seller) clarifies details about the graphics, stating some are vinyl stickers while others are attached with clear tape. Meanwhile, @Middler89 discusses concerns regarding the generator and charging system, to which @howie12 suggests adjustments might be needed. Additionally, @Bennie0118 inquires about the vehicle's highway capabilities and whether it's a 6V or has been converted to a 12V system, to which @Maxsells provides straightforward responses.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism and critiques regarding the vehicle. @SingleClutch questions the color scheme and its authenticity related to the "Mayberry police livery," pointing out historical inaccuracies. @dgardner55 describes the vehicle as "a bit 'kitschy'" and mentions a grammatical error on the design, which detracts from its appeal. Concerns about the vehicle's mechanics, such as the charging issue raised by @howie12, indicate that some buyers might question its reliability for longer trips.
|
 |
Positive: Many users have expressed admiration for the car's unique features, particularly highlighting its tan-colored soft top. @576168Birds noted its uniqueness and conveyed good wishes for the auction, while @birddoc acknowledged its beauty despite some concerns about the color change affecting its value. Furthermore, @59caddycoupe called it an absolutely beautiful T-bird, affirming its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments reflected inquiries about specific features of the vehicle, particularly the soft top and mechanical components. @SEUtah and @TJClassic both raised questions regarding the lack of pictures for the soft top, prompting the seller (@WFK1856) to clarify its condition and provide additional images. Others, like @gocorcoran and @mtbird66, asked about technical details such as the wipers and mechanical issues, showing an interest in understanding the car more fully before making bids.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the condition and modifications of the vehicle, which could impact its value and desirability. @birddoc pointed out that the application of undercoating during restoration may not have been ideal, while @Lottery69 provided non-constructive feedback. Additionally, there were questions about the car being converted to electric wipers and the authenticity of the replacement carburetor, highlighting possible uncertainties about the modifications made to the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vintage Vanagon, highlighting its nostalgic appeal and practicality for road trips and camping. @JoesOlds noted how much they love these vehicles and referenced their desire to upgrade to a 911, which shows a strong appreciation for the Vanagon's character. @stealthhabit praised the seller's knowledge and the overall condition of the van, considering it an affordable option for those tired of towing trailers. Additionally, @TaosHC mentioned the advantages of a camper van for leisurely park visits, indicating a broad recognition of the vehicle's charm and utility.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the condition and repairs of the van, often seeking clarification on specific aspects. For instance, @nvsn and @Boeingpilot inquired about damage under the protective bra. In response, @huhspuppy (The Seller) assured that the damage was superficial and detailed the extensive maintenance recently performed, including replacing multiple components and running videos to illustrate the vehicle's functionality. There was also interest in the AC system, with @PJatPM asking about missing components, which @huhspuppy addressed by explaining what remained intact.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns regarding the van's condition and repairs. @HDWalt suggested that the protective bra should be removed, indicating it may no longer serve its purpose effectively. Furthermore, the 'tapping' sound mentioned by @alanbrase raised questions about engine health, with some viewers expressing annoyance over this common issue in Vanagons. The discussion around the 'branded' title and concerns about the odometer further highlighted reservations, underscoring that while many appreciated the van, potential buyers also had significant questions about its reliability and history.
|
 |
Positive: @aeroskill commented on the vehicle’s cleanliness given its history, noting it’s impressive for having only 57k miles on the clock. @ratgirl56 expressed admiration for the car’s beauty and maintenance, while @kwiker recognized the effort put into detailing, highlighting its great appearance. The seller, @Mark50, provided reassurance by stating that new videos showcasing the car would be uploaded soon, generating excitement among potential buyers. Overall, there’s a collective appreciation for the car’s aesthetic and condition, portraying it as a desirable option among enthusiasts.
Neutral: There were questions and clarifications regarding the inclusion of the original wheels in the sale. @DBRK asked about the downpipe that was previously installed, while @ShirtPants sought clarification on the specifics of the wheels included with the car. @gurtabe inquired about the factory intake duct, and various commenters sought further information about the car’s tuning and history. @Mark50 addressed these inquiries by detailing the history of the modifications and confirmed that the BBS wheels would be included after all, balancing buyer expectations.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the condition of the BBS wheels, with @AmericanMuscles describing the seller’s rationale for excluding them due to their wear as ‘super weird.’ @Pimpmyride questioned if the wing had ever been removed to check for potential rust problems, reflecting apprehension about common structural issues in these models. @evw996 noted an oddity with the alarm system, which some found strange, creating hesitation about a car that might need additional repairs. Overall, while there was excitement, these concerns highlighted the usual scrutiny that comes with purchasing a used performance vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @danancy82 (The Seller) highlighted the vehicle's capability as a great TOAD (towed vehicle), noting that it was only towed a few times and had a new base plate and Blue Ox tow bar installed. Additionally, she mentioned the vehicle's reliability, stating that it has never needed repairs and has barely been driven. @allienjack shared a positive experience with a similar vehicle, emphasizing its longevity and reliability, indicating that the Jeep models tend to last well.
Neutral: @mrjo225 inquired about the specifications of the vehicle, specifically asking if it has a 2" receiver, which @danancy82 (The Seller) confirmed it does, along with additional features like JKS front sway bar quick disconnects not mentioned in the initial description. @richieroadrunner expressed interest in test-driving the Jeep and making an offer, demonstrating an active engagement in the purchasing process. @iwk2much asked if the Blue Ox equipment included with the RV was part of the sale, receiving a confirmation from @danancy82 (The Seller).
Negative: There were no explicitly negative comments about the vehicle. However, @allienjack pointed out potential smogging issues that some users may face with older Jeep models under California's regulations, while offering assistance in case the seller encounters such problems. Overall, there were no complaints directly targeting the condition or quality of the vehicle; the focus remained on inquiries and positive sentiments.
|
 |
Positive: Commentators are enthusiastic about the Innocenti's styling and overall charm, with many noting its beautiful design and the fun driving experience it offers. @padi621 shares their personal love for their 1973 Mini Innocenti, considering it their favorite to drive. @Mayjer also emphasizes the vehicle's reliability and past experiences with highway driving, noting that with proper maintenance, it's quite capable of maintaining highway speeds. Commenters express excitement about the vehicle's characteristics, showcasing a shared appreciation for its design and performance.
Neutral: Several comments focus on clarifications regarding the vehicle's functionality and performance capabilities, particularly concerning its suspension and braking systems. @meremer, the seller, explains that the collection consists of display vehicles rather than regular drivers, which raises questions about the car's usage. @mauly4 and @mah12054 express necessary inquiries about whether the vehicle has been driven since its listing and if it's suitable for driving. The conversation reveals a collective curiosity about the Innocenti's specifications and operational status.
Negative: There are concerns regarding the vehicle's safety and performance, particularly for driving in hilly areas and at high speeds. @mmoguls questions the effectiveness of its drum brakes, suggesting they may need to be scrutinized for hill driving. @Beldar voices a similar apprehension, pondering the vehicle's capability to travel at highway speeds, especially considering modern traffic conditions and safety with distracted drivers. Some comments indicate uncertainty about the vehicle's maintenance needs, with @denis62 raising questions about the hydro suspension system and its replacement parts, suggesting potential issues for buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their nostalgia and admiration for the vehicle, recalling personal memories associated with the model. @Bmyers5525 shared a fond memory of their sister’s first car, highlighting the fun times they had. Other comments such as @Kenny360's "Beautiful" and @JaDawgPNW's enthusiastic "Survived! Love it!" further reflect the positive sentiments surrounding the car. @Blackta79 even connected the vehicle to a popular show, demonstrating its cultural relevance.
Neutral: Several users posed questions regarding the car's condition and specifications, seeking clarity on various aspects. @Thesunisrising requested more detailed pictures of certain areas, while @TXDesFox asked about the cruise control functionality, reflecting practical concerns of potential buyers. @Hehfilwnw suggested getting the vehicle on a lift for a better view of the underside, emphasizing the need for thorough inspection and transparency on the car's condition.
Negative: Some comments pointed out potential concerns regarding the vehicle's history and functionality. @fas raised questions about the car's smog compliance and registration status, while @lilJoe6773 inquired about the air conditioning's operational state, noting that it was not mentioned in the auction details. Although @Aubrey (The Seller) assured that the car had no leaks and that all smog items were present, the inquiries indicate a level of skepticism about its overall reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @Skillman25 praises the truck's beautiful color combination and mentions owning a similar model, indicating it garners thumbs up wherever they go. @carstruck admires the old truck, expressing nostalgia for the hard-to-beat 70's two-tone design. @59FUELIEIMPALA (The Seller) enthusiastically shares that the radio works like new, both gas tanks function properly, and the truck has rare factory disk brakes, which adds to the overall appeal of the vehicle.
Neutral: @59FUELIEIMPALA (The Seller) addresses @ROBSREDFORD's concern about clear coat and repairs by clarifying that minor rust and clear coat issues exist but are manageable. The seller informs @WIZZZZ regarding the engine's specifications, noting it has a rebuilt 390 V8 with no leaks and a limited-slip rear end as indicated in the factory invoice. The seller also mentions the radio's functionality and the condition of the fifth wheel attachment in the bed of the truck.
Negative: @FiremanDan13 expresses discontent about the Chevrolet hubcaps on a Ford vehicle, wishing for original parts instead. @Hackberry reiterates this sentiment, remarking that it's better to have no hubcaps than incorrect ones, suggesting someone should buy the truck to rectify this issue. @WIZZZZ questions whether the suspension has been rebuilt and raises concerns about potential leaks, indicating apprehension about the vehicle's mechanical condition.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and overall quality, with @johnnyvett praising its original big block features and tons of cool options, suggesting it's a great find. @kevinwaspi highlighted the beauty of the build, while @e9er and @Propheadj echoed similar sentiments about the car being fantastic. @Coronette appreciated the car's upgrades and remarked on the quality of work done, stating that it needs to be driven without a top. Overall, most commenters convey excitement about the Corvette, signaling a strong community approval for @RGSDave1967's restoration efforts.
Neutral: A number of users were inquiring about specific details of the car, reflecting a mix of curiosity and concern regarding its features. @wolfsas and @limegreen396 asked questions about the engine specifications and whether there's a soft top available, indicating that these details are of interest but not inherently negative. @C3Lee and @Bosticsic sought clarification on modifications regarding the original parts and build history, while @AJ54 and @Noisyboyz entertained questions about the frame and construction specifics, all showcasing a keen observational interest in the vehicle's background without passing judgment.
Negative: There were some negative undertones in the comments regarding certain aspects of the restoration. @wolfsas expressed regret about the absence of a soft top, noting the high cost for replacement, which reflected on potential buyer concerns. Additionally, @jimstoybox pointed to scratches on the hood and fenders, questioning whether they were superficial or needed attention, thus raising issues about the vehicle's cosmetic condition. Others indicated doubts about the original parts and modifications, suggesting that the car might not meet everyone’s expectations for authenticity. Overall, while appreciation was abundant, there were also notable concerns about its completeness and minor imperfections.
|
3,100-Mile 2023 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat Widebody Jailbreak Last Call 6-Speed
2C3CDZC91PH654175
Lot 223457
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Motordad8 expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's looks and modifications, noting the potential impact of mods on value. @Bluesky also commented that the modifications are unlikely to detract from the vehicle's value. @parshooter appreciated the expensive stage kits which maintain the vehicle's warranty, while @THJimmy complimented the tasteful modifications made to the car.
Neutral: @N376S376, the seller, provided comprehensive background information about the vehicle, including its custom build, performance upgrades, and warranty details. They clarified that the Carfax entries for tire replacements were due to the installation of winter tires and not from high-performance driving. Additionally, they emphasized that the vehicle has been stored in a heated garage and maintained, which adds appeal and value.
Negative: @BBell333 raised concerns about visible surface rust and its implications for the vehicle's treatment in winter conditions. @b5challengershaker also questioned the discoloration of the exhaust tips, suggesting possible winter use. Despite these concerns, @N376S376 explained that visible rust is common among some Challengers, attributing it to manufacturing processes and prior outdoor exposure.
|
 |
Positive: @davethewave911 praises the vehicle as a beautiful example, noting the money spent on upgrades to an old chassis. @AuthenticAuctions (The Seller) elaborates on the car’s exceptional build quality, highlighting the powerful engine and lightweight body, while also mentioning the high levels of customization in the interior and gauges. @Cwmunsell expresses admiration for the build, stating it is among the most beautiful they have seen and that it competes favorably with luxury cars like the 911Turbo Cabriolet. @AFTOS1 calls it practically perfect in every way, showing strong interest from fellow enthusiasts.
Neutral: @jk6789 comments on the impressive videography of the driving footage, while @GlenK and @Cwmunsell pose questions about certain aspects like the exhaust height and hood latch system. @Cwmunsell seeks information about suspension adjustments to accommodate daily driving, indicating practical concerns rather than outright criticism. Comments about the build, including those questioning the locking mechanism and the absence of heating, indicate a desire for more information rather than negative feedback.
Negative: @AZspyder's comment was flagged as non-constructive, suggesting some negativity present in the discussions. @bkd320 raises a concern about the safety harness installation, questioning its security and visibility in photos, which implies potential concerns over safety. The discussions hint at worries about scraping and its suitability for regular driving, especially from @Cwmunsell and @GlenK questioning the practicalities of maintaining performance while ensuring manageability.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg describes the Grand Prix White Targa as "spectacular" and "riveting", while @Tmac327 expresses enthusiasm for the Carrera Targa G50, indicating there's much to love about the vehicle. Additionally, @headyv calls it an "incredible machine" and wishes others luck with the auction. Comments highlight the car's appealing aesthetics, craftsmanship, and the quality of the restoration performed by Pete's Custom Coachbuilding, known for its recognition and awards. @VintageMotorCarsUSA (The Seller) acknowledges the positive feedback, mentioning the meticulous work and impressive craftsmanship behind the car.
Neutral: Several commentators seek further clarification on mechanical specifics and the condition of certain components. @Leadville07pors inquires about recent service records, compression tests, and air conditioning performance, while @pbaron88 asks about the original parts and upgrades made to the vehicle. @VintageMotorCarsUSA (The Seller) addresses these questions, explaining that the car has had thorough work done and discussing the changes made, including upgraded brakes and wheel specifications. There is also curiosity about the current status of the exhaust system, given its alteration from the original setup.
Negative: A few comments express concern about the car's smog compliance. @balvord and @RonMan2 both mention that the vehicle would likely not pass California smog tests due to modifications like the removal of the catalytic converter and installation of a straight-piped exhaust, which are critical for compliance. @dorsel00 raises the point of wanting to revert to the original exhaust for emissions purposes, highlighting a potential drawback for prospective bidders in California. Overall, while the car's aesthetic and performance mods are praised, the smog compliance issue stands out as a clear consideration for interested buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are overwhelmingly impressed by the vehicle's power, describing it as 'wicked fast' and an 'incredible machine.' @sbmaine called it 'satanic in a good way,' while @PulseCheck said, 'what a wicked beast,' praising the driving video associated with the auction. @ZSSUSMC99 remarked on its unbelievable performance, and @TwoWheelAllTheThings highlighted its 'visceral' experience. The positive feedback continued with many commenters expressing admiration for the craftsmanship that went into building this race car, with @speed.house recalling its humble beginnings and growth into a world-class machine. It is seen as a car that not only demands respect but also showcases the seller's dedication and passion for automotive engineering.
Neutral: Some comments were more inquisitive regarding the vehicle's specifications and suitability for different racing formats. @kfennell and others posed questions about service history, wiring documentation, and the car's legality for highway use, indicating a practical interest rather than outright enthusiasm. @Tinker219, the seller, responded to these inquiries, reassuring potential bidders about the condition and features of the vehicle. He noted that it could be transported without de-winging and hinted at possible configurations to suit different racing environments. There was also recognition of the car's unique design and appeal, as commenters discussed logistics and specs without overtly expressing strong opinions.
Negative: Despite the largely positive reception, there are some negative sentiments expressed about the car. @edcesarman explicitly stated, 'I wouldn't touch it with a stick,' pointing out a certain level of skepticism among some potential bidders. Others mentioned concerns about the absence of certain documentation, like the Carfax report and window sticker, which can indicate potential issues related to the car's history or legality. @Tobyallen lamented the lack of beauty in modern race cars compared to classic models, expressing a longing for aesthetic appeals that he feels are missing from vehicles like this. Overall, while most feedback is adoring, a few users expressed reservations about practicality and personal preference.
|
 |
Positive: @CobraVic11 highlights the bike's beautiful condition and care, expressing confidence that no luck is needed for its sale. @Mouse51 praises the bike's performance and high-speed capability, noting the impressive speed reached during a brief drive-by. Several comments, such as those from @BigT77 and @E-TypeOTS, point out that the bike has low mileage and remains in top shape, further adding to its appeal. @Rumbling appreciates the aesthetic appeal, particularly mentioning the attractive red line wheels, while @KawTriple2t draws a nostalgic comparison to another model they owned, emphasizing the bike's status.
Neutral: Commenters like @thatsakillerpiece share technical insights regarding the bike's performance, noting its astonishing 1/4 mile times and handling capabilities compared to sportbikes. @2015GTS provides a practical view on the bike's comfort, which may require some modifications for optimal riding experience but still acknowledges the bike's speed and fun factor. Others, such as @DLCNC, raise questions about the intent of the drive-by videos posted, indicating curiosity about how they're perceived by others, while @onlyhonda4me shares an anecdote about a friend’s experience with the bike's surprising speed.
Negative: @KJY777 points out a dangerous driving incident while reflecting on a drive-by video, warning others to slow down. @2015GTS also shares some criticisms regarding the stock seat comfort and handling issues, especially when making abrupt turns. Overall, while many comments are positive, there are undercurrents of concern about safety and practicality, especially in high-performance situations.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the 2018 Maserati Ghibli S GranLusso, describing it as a beautiful car that embodies a perfect blend of luxury and performance. @Dollycat3 complimented its aesthetics and overall appeal. The seller, @Diandrac06, showcased the vehicle's excellent running condition and listed features like remote start and a drink cooler in the center console. Feedback from previous Maserati owners, such as @braddenning, highlights the thrilling performance aspects and lasting enjoyment of the brand, suggesting that the Ghibli offers a great driving experience and a stylish presence on the road.
Neutral: Several commenters asked questions about the vehicle's features and condition. @Patryk09 requested engine bay videos and additional footage related to engine operation while @CarpeDMC7 inquired about a potential issue with the front panel. The seller, @Diandrac06, patiently addressed these queries, confirming the minor clip issue and explaining the car's well-maintained condition, including detailed descriptions of previous cosmetic repairs.
Negative: While the general sentiment was positive, a few comments hinted at concerns regarding minor imperfections in the vehicle, such as the small cracks in the wood trim mentioned by @Diandrac06. Although these flaws were noted, they were not seen as major deterrents. The seller acknowledged these blemishes but emphasized the overall quality of the car, suggesting that any small issues can be addressed easily before or by the new owner.
|
 |
Positive: @Valiantjim noted that the 2005 Hemi truck engine swap into a Mercedes chassis was a pivotal moment for modern Mopar, and the Magnum’s unexpected success continued through the years, culminating in high-performance variants. He described it as a stealth collector's car due to its excellent condition, appealing colors, and low mileage. @ronsant shared his positive experience with his 2006 model, highlighting its smooth and comfortable ride, fast performance, and utility that exceeds that of competitors. @Nystagmus reminisced about owning a low-mileage 2007 Magnum R/T, applauding its comfort and speed while expressing regrets about not preserving it further. @OldGuy commended the vehicle's classification as an SUV to bypass the gas guzzler tax, which was an effective strategy for Mopar's market.
Neutral: Several commentors agreed on the challenges of preserving a vehicle like the Magnum, particularly when it's designed for active use. @CoopCity acknowledged its status as a potential daily driver but recognized the difficulty in maintaining its condition. The seller, @RudolphSleighs, mentioned that the car has been a 'garage queen' and regretted not having driven it more. They also detailed the vehicle's history, emphasizing adult ownership and consistent maintenance while providing transparency about the condition of the car. @dvotewi pointed out both the pros and cons of the vehicle, balancing its garage-kept status and the need for future maintenance.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's maintenance and condition based on the photographs shared by the seller. @JPreston expressed doubt about the car's upkeep, while @dmag1957 questioned why it wasn’t cleaned before the pictures were taken, reflecting apprehension about its presentation. @bloomindodgeboy inquired about potential engine noises once the vehicle reaches operating temperature, indicating skepticism regarding the mechanical reliability. Additionally, @Bhibdon83 asked about a throttle body warning light, which could signal underlying electrical issues, further highlighting potential concerns for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @ChrisCJC remarked that the vehicle is "very, very, very cool," which reflects a strong enthusiasm towards the car's aesthetic appeal. Additionally, @rofandofy echoed this sentiment by saying it's "very cool" and praised the top of the vehicle, implying a favorable impression of its design and features. Furthermore, @surfnc confirmed that the car is a Manx 2, clarifying a detail that may affect buyer interest positively by assuring them of its model authenticity.
Neutral: The comments from @OPS1215 and @Nab2 raised some relevant inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifics, notably the originality of the gelcoat and details on the decals, as well as requests for additional images of the pan and interior. These questions show genuine curiosity about the car's condition and modifications needed for potential buyers to make an informed decision. @Steeler85048 asked about the rear seat area and the battery well while speculating about its model classification, indicating a thoughtful analysis of the vehicle's structure.
Negative: There were concerns raised mainly surrounding the lack of detailed images and the clarity of the car's condition. @OPS1215 specifically questioned whether the gelcoat is original and if any repairs were masked by decals, which could hint at underlying issues. Additionally, @Nab2 and @Steeler85048's comments about wanting more pictures to confirm the vehicle's state suggest that potential buyers might feel uncertain about transparency in the sale, highlighting a risk of mistrust.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received commendations for its fun factor and overall performance. @BigT77 expressed enthusiasm by stating, "Looks like fun!" Additionally, @Billtodd1, the seller, emphasized the car's appeal by highlighting that it provides great handling and is a good value for the cost. He shared positive experiences about owning similar cars, noting the ease of maintenance and availability of parts, which adds to its attractiveness for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed interest in specific details about the car's history and specifications. @Krazer asked if Mike Stillwagon had raced this car, while @shrackracing posed questions regarding logbooks, cage stamping, and requested additional photos. @Worthenj inquired about the fuel cell and seat harness dates, showing a genuine interest in the vehicle's racing pedigree. @FR500SRacer contributed to the discussion by sharing insights about the fuel system, reinforcing the narrative around competitive use, and also noting the structure shown in the vehicle photos that could be explored further.
Negative: The comments indicated some concern and uncertainty about the vehicle's history and modifications. @Billtodd1 clarified that he could not find evidence of a fuel cell being previously installed, which may disappoint potential buyers seeking specific racing modifications. He also mentioned that the car had been in static display for about three years, implying it has not been actively used, which could raise questions about its current condition. Additionally, there was a focus on detailing issues, such as a replaced windshield and a power steering pump, which may suggest to buyers that there have been past maintenance challenges.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect positively on the GLK350, with @JayGatsby highlighting its impressive features such as a quiet ride, well-maintained condition, clean title, and non-smoker interior. Several potential buyers like @yellowc7vert and @Aaammm express their interest and appreciation, with @yellowc7vert commenting on the good looks of the vehicle and thanking @JayGatsby for confirming the repairs made to the vehicle. Additionally, @FloHa appreciates @JayGatsby's clarification on the process of obtaining a California title, indicating a sense of trust in the seller's knowledge.
Neutral: Some comments focus on practical inquiries and clarifications regarding the vehicle's details. @Dano131231 asks about reported damage, and @LLHVAC inquires about the car's visual appeal. @vertdaferk seeks confirmation on the absence of the 4Matic feature, and @Surf shares their experience with the shipping process offered through Bring a Trailer, suggesting a well-rounded process for buyers. These comments indicate that potential buyers are gathering information to make informed decisions.
Negative: There are concerns raised regarding past damage, as noted by @Dano131231, who asks for clarification on reported incidents related to scratches. @yellowc7vert mentions a rumble noise associated with the rear shocks, which may raise questions about the vehicle's performance history. While @JayGatsby assures that the scratches were minor and repaired, the initial concerns about condition could potentially deter cautious buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commentators expressed admiration for the Chrysler 300C, referring to it as a beautiful car and a legendary automobile. @Craven highlighted its striking factory air cleaner setup, while @brdwyray noted the intriguing odometer reading of 3928, suggesting it evokes a sense of nostalgia. @packardv8 called it the best road car of its time, emphasizing that other manufacturers like Ford and GM could not compare. Others such as @BigTanks and @samc1966 appreciated the overall design and distinctive features of the car, including its specific color variations. The 300C was praised for its combination of powerful performance and elegant styling, with @63impalaboy emphasizing its significant place in automotive history.
Neutral: There were informational comments regarding the specific features and history of the Chrysler 300C. @ronbo97 asked pertinent questions about whether the A/C and power windows worked, and whether the car pulled when braking, highlighting the importance of understanding the car's condition. Discussions about the headlamps also emerged, particularly from @neverenoughgold and @bosshoss3406pack, who debated the legality and factory options for quad headlights in various states. @ronbo97 and @Spartanman engaged in dialogue about the prevalence of quad vs. dual headlights in 1957 models, revealing a mix of personal anecdotes and historical curiosities.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the specific conditions and repairs associated with the vehicle. @pbf777 requested a detailed assessment of any body repairs or filler present, signaling caution for potential buyers who want transparency about the car's history. There were questions about the mechanical performance of the 300C, with @ronbo97 seeking clarification on operational features like brakes and control systems. Overall, while the car was largely admired, doubts related to its restoration and repairs lingered among some commenters, emphasizing the need for thorough inspection before purchase.
|
1979 Jeep CJ-5 Limited Edition Silver Anniversary 4-Speed Project
J9M83AC839829
Lot 223437
Private Party
 |
Positive: @notlikelytowin4 points out that the late model CJ5 has desirable features like the right transmission and transfer case for off-road use, suggesting that an informed buyer will find this vehicle appealing. @MissuDad expresses excitement about the vehicle's aesthetic, calling it 'SO cool' and highlighting its amazing patina. @CoopCity believes this Jeep has certainly been used for its intended purpose, which adds to its character and appeal.
Neutral: @rustyray describes the vehicle as a genuine barn or field find, indicating its potential as a restoration project. He acknowledges that it could be restored to its original Silver Anniversary specifications or simply reconditioned as a unique CJ, making it an interesting prospect for those looking for a project. @Meles46 (The Seller) provides additional information about the Jeep, mentioning the inclusion of original front seats for reupholstering and noting that the back seat is still in good condition.
Negative: There are no explicitly negative comments provided about the vehicle in this summary. All comments reflect a generally positive or neutral perception of the Jeep, focusing on its potential and the seller's transparency in providing details.
|
 |
Positive: @96Cruiser expressed that the vehicle has good potential value, referring to it as a 'nice truck.' @watergate528 simply commented 'Nice!' to show appreciation, while @Bigenca praised the truck's great drivetrain and stunning color combination, suggesting it's worth keeping an eye on.
Neutral: @Sierra-117 posed a question regarding the truck's paint, asking if it was original or repainted, to which @G4powder (The Seller) confirmed that the box paint is original but some parts had undergone repainting. @G4powder also provided details on maintenance work done on the vehicle, indicating a strong commitment to its upkeep, mentioning the rebuilt ECU, replaced u-joints, main seals, and that he is open to questions from potential buyers.
Negative: @commonbiker raised concerns about using the truck in snowy, salty conditions, inquiring about protective coatings for the undercarriage. @G4powder confirmed that it's essential to protect vehicles from salt damage, particularly in older models. Additionally, @FordsForeverSD asked about the complexities of the manual transmission swap, which suggests potential concerns about modifications and how they affect the vehicle's performance.
|
 |
Positive: @TheChadwickCollection expresses great pride in presenting the Mercedes Benz SL63 AMG, describing it as an absolutely stunning vehicle. They highlight its mint condition, having been well-cared for by previous owners who only used it on Sundays. The seller emphasizes the full Mercedes Benz service history and the recent paint correction, showcasing the car's readiness for a new owner. Additionally, videos shared by the seller capture the exhilarating power and sound of the vehicle, providing potential buyers with a glimpse of its performance and appeal.
Neutral: Commenters have raised some questions regarding the vehicle's history and features. @tucsonmike points out the concerning number of seven owners over twelve years, while @gscharnagl and @ripper996 note that the solid service history from a Mercedes dealer could indicate proper care. Some potential buyers are also inquiring about specific features, such as the Driver Assistance package and shipping options, while @TSolomon requests additional service records from previous visits for reassurance before bidding.
Negative: While the seller maintains a positive outlook on the vehicle's history, the multiple ownerships raise concerns for some potential buyers. @tucsonmike and @gscharnagl express worries that having so many owners could indicate issues, while @TSolomon seeks more concrete service records to build confidence in the car's condition. Overall, these comments suggest a level of hesitation from potential buyers regarding the car's history, despite the seller's enthusiasm and assurances.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters like @Johnny1eye express excitement about the vehicle, highlighting a desire to experience its full throttle capabilities. @9MikeMike appreciates both modified and factory original cars, suggesting a balance in the collector car hobby. Furthermore, @TheClassicCarCollective, the seller, provides information about the vehicle's modifications, detailing its drag racing history, engine specifications, and performance features. This transparency builds enthusiasm about the car's potential while also enhancing buyer confidence.
Neutral: Many commenters ask specific questions regarding the vehicle's condition and performance. @srwhouston prompts inquiries about the undercarriage photos, paint quality, and A/C system, conveying concerns about the vehicle's overall state. @Maximus1 and @scot502 seek clarification on the air conditioning system and request additional videos to assess engine health. @SJREnterprises mentions that while the car ran 9.90s previously, the current owner hasn't taken it to the track, providing context about its past performance.
Negative: Concerns are raised by users such as @magz357 and @09robwil, who comment on potential engine issues, signaling skepticism about the car's health with mentions of strange noises. The state of the A/C system and modifications raises red flags for others like @Tobyallen, who suggest that modifications might detract from the vehicle's value. Additionally, @Faedo350 questions the T-Top configuration and fiberglass hood, indicating confusion and concern about the vehicle's specifications based on inconsistent platform information.
|
 |
Positive: @AATAAB (The Seller) shared that the vehicle has been a fine car during their ownership, receiving many positive reactions from onlookers. They mentioned enjoying the driving experience and receiving 'thumbs up' from people asking about the car. Furthermore, @PhilB noted that the car is pretty, expressing optimism for the upcoming auction, indicating that the vehicle brings joy to its driver.
Neutral: @GREEKMBA remarked that a catalytic converter replacement was recommended but ultimately declined, asking for the cost to complete this repair. @Tiwasko expressed uncertainty about when the Y-pipe might begin to leak and sought clarification on the vehicle's current status. @AATAAB (The Seller) confirmed that the Y-pipe is not currently leaking and described the car's transmission as automatic, allowing gear shifts through the stick or paddle shifters.
Negative: @harrispatrickh raised concerns about the vehicle's history, noting how it had changed owners multiple times since 2019. @Gossir00 questioned the decision to decline the Y-pipe repair, seeking more context on the choices made. Additionally, @AATAAB (The Seller) reported that the check engine light illuminated after a drive and expressed discomfort keeping the vehicle listed for sale while issues remained unresolved, which suggests potential maintenance concerns.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the 1978 Chevy K10 highlight its solid condition and originality. @WCD2020 (The Seller) emphasizes that the truck is a true California survivor, with vibrant Cardinal Red paint and no major rust issues. Enthusiasts like @CRUSH and @jdjonesdr appreciate the nostalgia and classic appeal of this square body, echoing admiration for its condition and the legacy of these vehicles. Various users have expressed their excitement over the vehicle's well-preserved state and the seller's thorough presentation, affirming it's a rare find in such an original configuration.
Neutral: Some inquiries focus on the truck's functional aspects, such as @griffbl asking about the windshield and @Bell_Diver seeking clarification on the functionality of various components. These questions reflect an interest in ensuring the vehicle operates well and meets expectations. @Doug.W raises the point about confirming single ownership through Carfax, while @Copter11 and @Lando81 inquire about shipping costs and the functionality of the 4WD, which are practical considerations for potential buyers considering bids.
Negative: There are a few negative remarks, particularly from @FatDrunkandStupid who questions the authenticity of the engine modifications made to the truck, suggesting it might contain a generic remanufactured engine. @bentwheel was flagged for a non-constructive comment regarding the originality of the truck. @Smilinpat notes the potential challenges for California bidders regarding smog laws due to modifications, underlining concerns about emissions testing which could lead to unexpected costs. @WCD2020 (The Seller) addresses these critiques robustly, asserting that the modifications are common and that the truck is fundamentally original.
|
1971 International Harvester 1210 Pickup Dually Conversion 4×4 4-Speed Brush Fire Truck
143208H118201
Lot 223411
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its unique qualities and potential. @RalphSmith described it as 'Beautiful!!', while @Cammergalaxie referred to it as a 'Very cool rig!' @BostonCarGuy added that it would look 'insanely cool' at Mt. Hood, suggesting it captures attention and imagination. The seller, @Sandrider123, also appreciated the supportive comments and thanked everyone for their kind words about the truck, indicating a positive reception from the community.
Neutral: Some comments raised questions regarding the vehicle's functionality and features. @prludluver inquired about the engine's performance, mentioning that the engine video was too short to assess its condition thoroughly. @ralphsmith asked about potential issues with the lights on top related to state inspections, to which @Sandrider123 clarified that the emergency equipment was usually unhooked during decommissioning, and there are no inspection requirements in Oregon, providing a straightforward response.
Negative: There were a few concerns mentioned that could be seen as negative. @prludluver's comment suggested uncertainty about the vehicle's mechanical state due to the incompleteness of the information provided. While @ralphsmith’s inquiry about the lights implies potential legal concerns regarding inspections, overall, there were no strongly negative remarks, and the seller addressed the issues with assurance.
|
 |
Positive: @stugottz commented on the vehicle as "a clean machine," showcasing a strong appreciation for its condition. @GLWTA expressed that it is a great investment-grade car in Corvette gray color, highlighting its right motor and accessories. Many others, like @BigT77, also admired the beautiful design, classic color combo, and overall great condition of the car, stating that it has everything a Corvette from the era should have, indicating a positive consensus on its aesthetics and desirability.
Neutral: @C_Lmotorsllc (The Seller) provided comprehensive details about the car's performance and specifications. They assured potential buyers that the car runs and drives perfectly and is a lot of fun. The seller has also engaged with the audience by responding to various questions about documentation and engine details, even agreeing to check the availability of the tank sticker and engine casting codes, showing an openness to communication and transparency.
Negative: Despite the mostly positive feedback, some comments raised concerns. @ArizonaGreg expressed frustration over a $75 doc fee for a car expected to sell for over $75k, questioning its fairness. @Shootnride and others highlighted doubts regarding the originality of the engine stampings, suggesting the need for expert evaluations and raising concerns about the accuracy of the information provided by the seller. These negative comments reflect apprehensions that potential buyers might have about the vehicle's authenticity.
|
 |
Positive: @Surf highlighted that this GL line, particularly before the introduction of turbo engines, boasts a better power plant. @66GTconvorigownr remarked on the excellent value of the vehicle, indicating it will offer a lot for the price. @jsloden shared personal experience owning a similar model with high mileage, claiming the air suspension issues are manageable and emphasizing the superior ride quality of the vehicle, which could resonate positively with potential buyers.
Neutral: @AutoBaz (The Seller) provided essential information about the car's availability, inviting questions from the community and mentioning features like Bluetooth and satellite radio. They confirmed that the steering wheel is not heated, responding directly to @Georgeamoth's inquiry and addressing concerns regarding the vehicle's safety features as well. @Calbigsurf raised questions about recalls and suspension system service, receiving responses that indicated no current recalls and recent maintenance on the vehicle's air suspension.
Negative: @mcboone57 expressed disappointment over the absence of a heated steering wheel, suggesting that it is a standard feature in many luxury vehicles, contrasting it with an older BMW. @Calbigsurf inquired about the airbag recalls and the condition of the air suspension system, reflecting a concern about potential hidden issues that could arise. Additionally, @georgepehanick's queries about the audio features and performance of the air suspension indicated some apprehension about the car's technology and maintenance based on past issues.
|
|
|