Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: @ctaben remarked that this bike is as good as it gets, while @sodo-moto expressed his appreciation for both the bike and the craftsmanship by @MagniMan. @MercuryKG7H predicted the auction will go very high, complimenting the bike's beauty. @Dime was impressed with the bidding on a beautiful MV, and @Multistrada1 noted that this motorcycle is such a remarkable example of a highly prepared model from a top restoration expert. @John_B praised the restoration and the exquisite sound produced by the engine, describing it as incredible, and @Torchbearer also appreciated the wonderful sound of the bike during revs. Overall, there’s a strong consensus among commenters about the bike’s wonderful aesthetics and performance.
Neutral: @moto.borgotaro, the seller, engaged with other commentors positively, thanking them for their bids and sharing details about the ongoing auction process. He mentioned he would be available for questions until the auction closes, indicating a willingness to interact with potential buyers. Other participants like @NCR600TT and @o.c.f.rider contributed historical insights about the bike's specifications and previous models, showing a community of enthusiasts interested in the mechanical history of these motorcycles. Several commenters reminisced about their experiences or knowledge of MV Agusta, which contributed to the overall intrigue surrounding the auction.
Negative: However, not all comments were wholly positive. @Shelby314159 questioned why a 9,000-mile California bike would need such extensive restoration, suggesting it might have had a tough life, potentially involving track use or street racing. @Garagerat expressed doubt over the bike's price, mentioning it is too rich for his blood despite its stunning appearance. @flyingdago brought up issues about potential tariffs on Italian motorcycles, which could affect future pricing and desirability. @bewildered humorously countered this concern, suggesting that the Italians would ultimately bear the cost of any tariffs imposed.
 |
 |
Positive: @ZENWERKS shared their experience of purchasing this car as a special birthday gift, highlighting the extensive work done to ensure it runs beautifully, including tuning the mechanical fuel injection. They appreciate the car's overall condition, mentioning new tires, functioning gauges, and the great shape of the tops. The mention of restoration work by the previous long-term owner and the inclusion of original manuals further adds to the car's value. @Irebld echoed this sentiment, noting how the car looks even better in person, with excellent paint and chrome work that has held up impressively over the decades. They praised its smooth engine performance and the interior's refinished wood, indicating that the car would be a pleasure to own.
Neutral: @alchazar contributed some factual insights regarding the vehicle, mentioning the horn and some potential quirks of the model. They also provided specific details such as the notable absence of certain parts typically found in similar cars, reinforcing the idea that this one carries unique aspects due to its early production year. @Piapia, the seller, engaged actively with comments, confirming details about the car including wheel specifications and the lack of a second horn, showcasing transparency and openness to inquiries from potential buyers.
Negative: Conversely, there were some concerns raised, as @Irebld noted that while the engine runs well, it might be slightly down on power due to its 2.2-liter displacement compared to others. They also pointed out that the car lacks air conditioning, which could affect comfort on warm days, and that it does not have power steering, which some drivers might prefer. @alchazar also brought attention to the fact the vehicle has a replacement engine, which could impact its value and desirability among purists. This provides a more cautionary perspective for potential buyers, balancing the more glowing reviews.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has been described as a beautiful car with a flawless paint condition, noted by @indo (The Seller), who also mentioned that the car has original paint on most panels except for the front bumper. @DVZ praised the car's aesthetics, while @gcbrink expressed a personal bias, noting that they own a similar spec vehicle. Additionally, users have commented on the car’s specifications, indicating a well-regarded model among enthusiasts, and @VTys2k complimented the combination of Light Sepang and Interlagos colors.
Neutral: Several users raised questions regarding the vehicle’s maintenance and condition. @future_ inquired about the maintenance history and documentation since the car has only been driven 600 miles in the last five years. @DVZ and @ballistic720 asked for records of oil changes and service history, and highlighted concerns about long-term oil degradation due to infrequent driving. @iceman122 requested information about the clutch and interior headliner, while others, such as @Jefff605, sought visual confirmations about the condition of the paint and the potential for a driving video.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the information provided about the car, primarily from @ekimp, who pointed out inaccuracies in the description of the steering rack, stating that it does not have the M3 CSL rack as claimed. @ballistic720 expressed skepticism about the car's maintenance history, questioning the lack of documented oil changes aside from the report of a starter replacement. @DVZ also highlighted a potential issue with peeling clear coat around the headlamp washer, casting doubt on the overall condition despite the seller’s assurances.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz praises the stunning appearance of the 991.2 C4 GTS coupe, describing it as Jet Black Metallic magic and a killer build, showcasing strong enthusiasm for the vehicle. @GDogg finds the car absolutely fantastic, and @Gummer compliments the spec, inquiring about the nature of the stripes, whether they're painted or decals. @ryansw65 shares admiration for the car, alongside an appreciation for the tasteful modifications that may enhance its value in the active market.
Neutral: @BoktorMotors, the seller, clarifies that while original body parts are included, the stock rims will only be sold separately for an additional cost. The seller is attempting to acquire a copy of the original window sticker as requested by @rx7gslse and acknowledges multiple inquiries about obtaining a rev report for the car. The seller mentions details about modifications and the car's emissions status, emphasizing transparency regarding the vehicle's history and modifications, while also addressing concerns about the DME report that many potential buyers are seeking.
Negative: Concerns arise from commenters like @Pinestraw and @Maddmike regarding the lack of a DME report, suggesting that this may lead to distrust from potential buyers, as it might imply hidden issues. @Maddmike explicitly notes that the absence of this report is problematic, particularly for the manual transmission vehicle. @Rocketman63 questions the lack of emissions inspection since 2020, highlighting a potential red flag regarding the car's compliance with regulations, which may further complicate the perceived reliability of the sale.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, highlighting its rare and beautiful condition, particularly noting its low mileage and unique Christmas green color. @GSAudio expressed hope for a successful auction, while @Fartparts referred to it as a "unicorn," suggesting it was something special and hard to find. @StevieF reminisced about the fun of driving such cars and wished luck to the next owner, reflecting a shared appreciation within the community for the Corrado's iconic status. @Youngtimerclassics noted that the car appeared untouched, suggesting authenticity that collectors value, further underlining the admiration for its originality and overall aesthetics.
Neutral: There were several neutral inquiries and comments regarding specific features and conditions of the car. @Dragon and @Ribeirodesa asked about the functionality of the sunroof and the original stereo, indicating they were gathering information for potential bidding. Other users, including @Mikelowie, inquired about smog compliance for California, demonstrating a practical interest from bidders. @2hecknback (The Seller) engaged with these questions directly, providing information about conditions and addressing concerns raised by commenters regarding the vehicle's features.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, a few negative points were raised regarding the vehicle’s condition. @dapucker1 humorously pointed out a color mismatch, while @Number_Six raised a concern about possible issues that may arise from not operating the sunroof, suggesting a potential for rust. @lawdog185 mentioned the commonality of sunroof failures with older vehicles, hinting at potential maintenance issues. Additionally, @mrhat557 expressed caution about the car's paint condition, questioning if it was perfect, while @Imarmd2 noticed a possible crack in the fog lamp, indicating that some buyers were concerned about minor imperfections.
|
 |
Positive: @Gxguy470 expressed appreciation for @Pristine4x4's high-quality vehicles, wishing them good luck with the auction. @2k2k shared a personal account of having owned a 2006 GX470, stating that anyone interested in this vehicle will not be disappointed. @Pristine4x4 emphasized that they strive to offer thorough reconditioning of each Gx470, showcasing the vehicle’s cleaned and well-maintained status, complete with a $11,000 plus service record for important mechanical work and cosmetic improvements.
Neutral: @Edvert inquired about concerns regarding the mismatched steering wheel, and both @Edvert and @Winefan94941 raised questions about the transmission and differential fluids and the condition of the vehicle’s door trim and speakers. @Pristine4x4 clarified that the steering wheel was indeed original and confirmed good maintenance history prior to their ownership, addressing all layered concerns.
Negative: @Winefan94941 pointed out apparent issues with the paintwork on the vehicle, indicating a significant mismatch, while @2k2k asked about a missing panel and potential leaks, raising doubts about the vehicle's cosmetic integrity. Although @Pristine4x4 responded to these concerns, the fact that the vehicle’s maintenance records were not fully reflected on Carfax left some potential buyers feeling apprehensive.
|
 |
Positive: @Mjcalabrese expressed his fondness for the vehicle, stating it was one of his all-time favorites and wishing good luck to the winning bidder. The seller, @AlpinaOkie, highlighted the car's performance, mentioning the installation of an Italian EUR01 electronic fuel injection system, which has positively enhanced the car's dynamics. Several commenters appreciated the unique features of the car, including the m-texture seat inserts and the valuable BBS wheels that are included in the sale, as well as a rare E30 electrical manual which adds to the overall appeal of the package being offered.
Neutral: Many comments focused on the original features and current condition of the vehicle, with @tysimon and @Jackmarkussen inquiring about the paint and odometer reading. @AlpinaOkie clarified that the stripes on the car are painted, not vinyl wraps, and provided insights into its history and previous modifications made by @Mjcalabrese. There were also discussions about the car's suitability for California ownership due to the absence of a catalytic converter, reflecting a practical aspect of the vehicle’s compliance with local regulations.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding visible wear on the decals and the overall condition of the paint underneath, with @septicore asking about potential rust or corrosion issues. @Marichardson noted that the lack of a catalytic converter might disqualify it for use in California, which could affect potential bidders in that region. Additionally, @Che_Vuoi remarked that the car needs more decals, and others inquired about engine work and the performance related to different climates, signaling some apprehension about maintenance and usability.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are highly impressed with the vehicle, describing it as a "dream build" and appreciating the combination of power and driveability while maintaining a classic appearance. @84runner praised it as a perfect FJ40, and @GertMurf expressed admiration with a simple, "Well done!!!" Many appreciate the seller's approach, noting the detailed responses provided regarding vehicle specifications and modifications. @GLCTraveler echoed similar sentiments, highlighting the solid construction and quality of work performed by Cruiser Outfitters, further complimenting the seller on a great built by stating, "awesome build".
Neutral: Several commenters sought further information about the vehicle, asking practical questions about features such as the removable top and air conditioning. @Mkirschman and @CharlesDawson both inquired about whether the top could be removed and the existence of air conditioning, respectively. Other inquiries included requests for a driving video and specifics on highway comfort from commenters like @Shawnkohan and @Traviswright, along with questions regarding engine details and gauge functionality from @TMBHALO. These questions reflect a genuine interest in understanding more about the vehicle's capabilities and enhancements.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle's highway driving performance. @Cavemanfj40 strongly advised against driving it at high speeds, suggesting that it was not built for such conditions due to its design. Additionally, @Orlando10s expressed worries about the low mileage on the odometer compared to the age of the vehicle and the potential issues that could arise from sitting unused for an extended period, questioning the reliability of the engine and transmission based on personal experience. These concerns indicate skepticism regarding the vehicle's roadworthiness and overall integrity.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's nostalgic appeal and historical significance, noting it as a rare and beautiful example from Lancia. @Wolfenhaus reminisces about loving these cars as a child, while @skosieruxo remarks on its low mileage and potential high value in the collector market. Enthusiasts like @Vtec4ever highlight the car's Italian charm, comparing it favorably to other classics and grounding excitement in its handling and driving experience. Other owners and collectors, like @Carguy1z and @Sandpiper, praise the car’s original condition and beauty, indicating it could certainly find a good home without heavy modifications.
Neutral: Several comments present inquiries and information about the vehicle’s condition and modifications, suggesting a general curiosity among potential buyers. @Justin65 questions the removal of the air conditioning system, leading to discussion about its performance implications, while @Chops probes about supporting documentation for the car's low mileage. Some users, like @EngineerRetired, provide insights into common issues with the vehicle’s cooling system and A/C efficiency, contributing knowledgeable context without a strong bias toward approval or disapproval. Furthermore, @ProRallyCodriver and @2hecknback discuss the car's design history and modifications, hinting that while there are diverse opinions about its features, the community remains engaged with the vehicle narrative.
Negative: On the flip side, there are concerns raised about specific modifications that could affect the car's registration and its overall usability. @AMfan notes the removal of emissions equipment, which could complicate registration in California, while @Martyn10 humorously critiques the car's speedometer in relation to its low horsepower. Commenters like @Rick voice their discomfort with the cabin's tightness, questioning its ergonomics for taller individuals, while others, including @OldGTVMan, comment on the vehicle's rough appearance under the hood despite low mileage, leading to speculation about its past care. The overall sentiment reflects a mix of admiration paired with cautious concerns about the vehicle's modifications and practicality for modern use.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlight the visual appeal and solid condition of the vehicle. @birddoc remarks that it looks like a nice, solid car and expresses that it could be more valuable if the color had not changed. @Eaglecliff (The Seller) emphasizes that the car looks great underneath and has no rust, stating that they have received positive feedback at car shows, indicating it drives well and is regarded as the best looking T-Bird they have owned. Furthermore, @Eaglecliff (The Seller) assures potential buyers that the vehicle can be driven anywhere without issues, showcasing confidence in its reliability.
Neutral: There are multiple inquiries about specific parts and features of the vehicle, such as the soft top and transmission details. @7257scottt and @corvettom9 raise questions about the soft top being a replacement or aftermarket, while @Gord6 requests a photo of the transmission to confirm whether it has an overdrive feature. Additionally, questions are posed about the switch located under the dash and the condition of the glass, indicating that potential buyers are seeking clarification on the car's modifications and current state.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding some aspects of the vehicle's condition and modifications. @birddoc points out several issues such as the incorrect installation of the trunk weatherstrip, the absence of the original distributor, and the fact that there appears to be no overdrive relay. @corvettom9 shares doubts about the toggle switch used for the overdrive, referencing personal experience with similar vehicles where the overdrive was engaged differently. Moreover, @extended46 questions the alignment of the hood, suggesting possible mechanical issues that may affect the vehicle's appeal.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered much appreciation for its stylish design and unique characteristics, with commenters praising its appeal. @Craven mentioned that for those raised in a Pontiac family, the 1967 model is iconic, calling it a strong buy. @stugottz expressed love for the Pontiac Catalina convertible and shared fond memories that heighten the car's nostalgic value. Additionally, @maw06 noted the car's power and style, reminiscing about the enjoyment his father had with a similar vehicle, thus highlighting the car's lasting legacy among Pontiac enthusiasts.
Neutral: There were some discussions about specific features of the vehicle that left a sense of curiosity among the commenters. For example, @Noisyboyz questioned the seller's reasoning for not driving the car frequently, presenting an interesting perspective on collector behavior. @Viper1 provided insight into their collection habits, explaining the reasoning behind limited driving and caring for their cars like art. Furthermore, @Middler89 and @Tri-C had discussions regarding the steering wheel's authenticity and the engine build, showcasing a healthy discourse among potential buyers looking to understand more about the vehicle.
Negative: Conversely, there were some criticisms regarding the accuracy of the listing and the seller's lack of driving experience with the vehicle. @jj36 pointed out a discrepancy in the listing details, confusing the transmission type. Furthermore, @Noisyboyz raised concerns about the maintenance implications of such low driving mileage, which could affect the car's longevity, while @elheadflat highlighted the absence of underbody pictures, signaling potential oversight that some buyers might find concerning. These criticisms indicate a need for more transparency and detail about the vehicle to assuage potential buyer concerns.
|
 |
Positive: @CoopCity noted that someone will get a great deal on the vehicle for a fraction of its MSRP, indicating excitement about the auction. @davidfry805 complemented the car's low mileage and expressed curiosity about its backstory, followed by a positive response from @aSingh39 (The Seller) detailing its well-maintained condition under an elderly owner's care. @MB54 also received assurance regarding the car's excellent driving condition, with @aSingh39 stating it drives smoothly and has no oil leaks, enhancing its appeal.
Neutral: @Merenkei inquired about Bluetooth connectivity and auxiliary hookups, while @jndaniell asked how many keys are available. @storix1 requested additional information including a driving video and possible maintenance records, which @aSingh39 (The Seller) addressed with commitments to post those details soon. @EJWinters3 and @billdovell sought clarification on tire conditions, brakes, and navigation capabilities, all of which were met with informative responses from @aSingh39, underscoring a willingness to engage with potential bidders.
Negative: Concerns arose from @storix1 regarding a possible issue with the driver's side rear rotor, raising red flags about potential caliper drag problems. Additionally, questions about the absence of owners' manuals and maintenance records created some apprehension, as did the absence of certain modern features like CarPlay, which @EJWinters3 wanted confirmation on. @aSingh39's acknowledgment of these queries illustrates both the challenges in fully reassuring potential buyers and the need for more comprehensive documented maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: @M-Williams1959, the seller, emphasizes that the vehicle can be driven cross-country and runs smoothly. They have used it for geological fieldwork in Wyoming for many years, performing exceptionally well in tough terrains, which showcases its reliability. Multiple commenters, including @SkyStevens and @Geoffrey_Isabelle, express fondness for the FJ60, noting its charm and character despite its age. @SkyStevens appreciates that it's a 40-year-old Toyota, while @Geoffrey_Isabelle finds the truck's honest appearance appealing, valuing its authenticity over cosmetic perfection.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle's condition vary, with some inquiries regarding specific issues such as the alignment of the hood and possible leaks from the drivetrain and engine, raised by @ttawfik3. @cwsteel questions the overall condition of the vehicle, including its ability to handle long drives. The seller, @M-Williams1959, acknowledges these concerns, providing details about the vehicle's maintenance history and reassuring potential buyers about its performance. The discussion around the clutch maintenance raises relevant considerations for prospective buyers about its longevity.
Negative: Some negative aspects are suggested in comments about potential issues with the vehicle. @ttawfik3 raises concerns regarding the hood misalignment and questions the possibility of past accidents, which @M-Williams1959 attempts to address by clarifying the history and repairs. Additionally, @BarrettSaal points out alarming signs regarding frame damage and rusty bolts, prompting the seller to investigate these issues. The seller acknowledges minor rust and missing bolts but insists that the framework is sound, though such observations might cause worries for prospective buyers about the truck's long-term durability.
|
 |
Positive: @Cdn043 shared enthusiasm for the XLR, expressing love for their 2005 model that they purchased from BaT. They also praised the top operation videos shared by @Tonys69, calling them one of the best they've seen. @Vintage1958 described the car as awesome and seemed impressed by its low mileage, suggesting that it is undervalued in the market.
Neutral: @Revrider initiated the discussion by sharing a fun fact about their current vehicle, the '06 XLR, encouraging the seller to post a top operation video. There was a question from @Cdn043 regarding the plexiglass air dam option, and @ColoTom inquired about the manufacturing date of the tires, which @Tonys69 confirmed as October 2017. @Tonys69 further assured that the tires are in excellent condition with no cracking, and the vehicle is kept in a temperature-controlled garage.
Negative: @Drdodger raised concern about a part that appeared to be from a shop vac in pictures, suggesting a potential oversight in the vehicle's condition. @Cdn043 noted the absence of the plexiglass air dam option, which could imply a lack of completeness or modification in the car's features. @Hardley pointed out the general interest in the roof operation, indicating that without such information, potential buyers might find it hard to judge the car's capabilities.
|
 |
Positive: @JWHBOOMER commented positively about the truck, appreciating its desirable stepside style and noting that it isn't overly modified, which adds to its charm. @mike_rockwell echoed a favorable sentiment, expressing that the truck appears to be in good condition and rust-free. @1956ChevyPU (The Seller) also provided reassurance about several features of the truck, confirming that it has a working heater and defroster, a properly functioning electric choke, and minimal oil leaks that have not been an issue.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification and additional information about the vehicle. @dagmar82 asked whether the wipers and heater function correctly and if the original wheels are available. @TGwjacod-akota requested more detailed pictures of the undercarriage and other specific areas of the truck. Meanwhile, @jmcnpapa inquired about the speedometer's functionality and requested a driving video to demonstrate the vehicle's performance.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding various issues with the truck. @Cyrusmc1947 and @carlheizer pointed out the discrepancies regarding the transmission type, questioning the automatic designation based on visual evidence of a manual setup. @Alaskastang and @TheAxman highlighted potential engine leaks and asked for clarity on the source of coolant stains. @JIMMY suggested that the listing could benefit from more photos to help potential buyers assess the vehicle better, while @dstcld pointed out leakage concerns with the coolant, sparking discussions about their origin.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz: Wow, what a scintillating silver Bronco. Beautiful build – GLWTA! 👍🍻⚽️. @SoCalMetal: Great looking Bronco! Is this a Gen 2 Coyote? @BeastRig: Beast of a rig.
Neutral: @Nnakhshab (The Seller): @notlikelytowin4 I purchased the truck from Vintage Broncos in Atlanta. Here what the truck listed regarding the axils “New hybrid front axle + 9" rear axle with 4.11 gears”. Thanks. @KHC7: Willing to assist with shipping? @todd415: Is that a full soft top I see in pics 100-102? Any other tops included? @Nnakhshab (The Seller): @todd415 this is the only top I purchased for the vehicle. It just folds down in the rear of the truck. @Nnakhshab (The Seller): @socalmetal yes this is a Gen2 coyote. @bfoldy: @seller Can you please verify it’s currently registered in CA? @Nnakhshab (The Seller): @bfoldy yes it’s currently registered in California.
Negative: @notlikelytowin4: Are those ford 9" axles front and rear? Can you provide more information on them, ratio, shafts, lockers? @Moshes1: Can you please add driving video? @Moshes1: Any driving videos?
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described as mechanically solid and turn-key, having been recently upgraded with several enhancements including a nudge bar, roof rack, and a high-quality sound system featuring an Alpine head unit with CarPlay. The seller, @outlandmotors, shares experiences of driving the vehicle long distances without issues, highlighting its reliability. Overall, the seller emphasizes the vehicle's strong performance and readiness for enjoyment by the next owner, showcasing a commitment to quality through the upgrades and maintenance performed.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding specific vehicle details, such as height measurements with and without the roof rack, which @outlandmotors provides clearly as 79.5 inches and 83 inches respectively. Questions have also been raised about the transfer case ratio, where the seller confirms it remains at the standard LT230 unit ratio of 1.4:1 without any modifications. The seller notes the lack of original paperwork regarding specific build details, which may leave some potential buyers inquiring further about the vehicle's history.
Negative: Some users express concerns about aesthetic choices, such as @Mcgregor55 who is not fond of the faux carbon wrap and requests floor area photos, suggesting a desire for transparency about the vehicle's condition. Although @outlandmotors assures that there are no rust issues beneath the carpet and soundproofing, the absence of visual documentation may lead to skepticism among potential buyers. Additionally, the lack of complete original paperwork and detail clarity may discourage some from proceeding with purchasing without further clarification.
|
 |
Positive: @PytstopMotorcars, the seller, showcases considerable effort in promoting the vehicle, having taken approximately 300 photographs from various angles and committing to uploading multiple videos soon. This level of transparency indicates confidence in the car's condition. He describes the car as a great driver, emphasizing its strong performance and mechanic condition for its age. Additionally, service records highlight recent maintenance, including regular oil and filter changes, which can reassure potential buyers about the vehicle's upkeep.
Neutral: Several commenters have pointed out the challenges posed by the current state of the vehicle's presentation. @Targa4 suggests that buyers expect detailed inspections and quality photos, while both @Ron13 and @kanstrei notice issues with the photography, suggesting that better quality images could enhance buyer confidence. @kanstrei raises concerns about the odometer, indicating it may have stopped working in 2018 or 2019, aligning with some uncertainties about the car's history and authenticity.
Negative: Criticism arises regarding the aesthetic aspects of the vehicle and the preparation of the seller's materials. @JustaGlitch expresses dissatisfaction with the red wheel-inserts and the BMW steering wheel. @kanstrei further questions mechanical components, such as a pop-off valve affixed improperly to the airbox, which adds to the skepticism about the car’s condition. Overall, the lack of clarity on certain features, alongside concerns about the odometer and photography quality, contributes to a sense of doubt among potential buyers.
|
Original-Owner 1995 Toyota Tacoma LX XtraCab V6 4×4 5-Speed
4TAVN73F5SZ065131
Lot 224342
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle's reliability and history, noting that it has averaged over 10,000 miles a year for 30 years. @YELLADOG appreciates the impressive mileage and longevity that Toyota trucks offer, evoking a sense of nostalgia for vehicles that actively served their owners for decades. @UsernameX shares that they own a similar truck and frequently drive it, highlighting a growing appreciation for these dependable models. @Tonysrx7 congratulates the seller on maintaining an original owned vehicle that has seemingly seen countless adventures, while @Fitzroya mentions the truck's notable journey as impressive, adding a sense of value to its character beyond mere equipment.
Neutral: Several comments express a desire for more detailed information regarding the truck's condition, specifically around areas prone to issues like frame arches and undercarriage details. @Phill-E requests visuals of potential problem areas while a few others, like @Sarki, mention that the auction listing could benefit from better presentation. Some users seek clarification about prior ownership and the condition of crucial components like the seating and door handles with @Rainman870 and @Sernorman both asking for specifics about repairs, functionality, and parts replacement. @Paschal highlights inconsistencies related to ownership records from Carfax versus the seller's claim, pointing to a need for more transparency.
Negative: Criticism arises regarding the seller's responsiveness and the perceived lack of detailed disclosures related to the truck's condition. @Stager50 argues against the unreasonable expectations for multiple pictures and excessive nitpicking of a high-mileage vehicle, suggesting many comments are overly demanding. @Lakotachief21 questions why the vehicle is listed while the seller is abroad, indicating that vital information about the truck's restoration potential is missing. Additionally, @1stDaughtertruck and others express skepticism about the seller's claim of being the original owner, pointing out discrepancies with the reported history, indicating confusion or mistrust in the authenticity of the listing.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciate the vehicle's noise levels, with @mikeisit86 highlighting that engine and road noise are hardly noticeable even with the AC on. This sentiment is echoed by another commenter who finds it quiet when the air is on. Additionally, @wishful admires the truck’s vintage appeal and suggests making minor improvements to enhance its longevity while praising the decision to maintain its camo finish, indicating it would perform well in outdoor settings.
Neutral: There were practical inquiries regarding the vehicle, such as @ToddCorey asking for the seat height, expressing concerns due to his paralysis and explaining how that restriction affects his bidding ability. @Stinger17 promptly responds with the needed information, demonstrating a helpful disposition. Another commenter, @arizona-oneforfun, shares insights about the vehicle's brake modifications which suggests a general familiarity with military vehicles while engaging with @savagebilt about the vehicle's specifications.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism or confusion regarding the vehicle's history and condition. @mikeisit86 jokingly questions whether the vehicle was involved in firefighting, hinting at uncertainty about its previous use. Additionally, @ToddCorey mentions that the high delivery cost posed a barrier for him, indicating frustration about accessibility issues. Meanwhile, @THASS's light-hearted comment about the use of a Red Solo cup suggests a negative undertone regarding the vehicle's purpose or maintenance, although it’s framed humorously.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express a genuine fascination with the vehicle, highlighting its status as an early electric pickup truck. @ScottOnTheRocks shows enthusiasm for the potential of future electric vehicles like the Ford Maverick EV, suggesting that advancements in electric trucks are highly anticipated. @Cobraman66 reminisces about the time when Ford introduced these models, praising their innovative nature as they were 'definitely introduced before their time.' @genomicdoc shares a personal experience of owning a similar vehicle, noting that it provided him with a unique and enjoyable driving experience without needing traditional fuel.
Neutral: Several comments request more detailed information about the vehicle's specifications and background. @lsitongia asks about the lithium battery conversion process, reflecting a curiosity about the technical aspects of the vehicle. @Michaewh and @Jearnhart are both interested in seeing a driving video and learning more about the battery's kWh capacity. @Spokayman provides historical context regarding early electric trucks, indicating that the Ranger was advanced for its era, adding perspective to the discussion about the vehicle's design and performance.
Negative: On the negative side, some comments critique the vehicle's appearance and performance. @Spokayman points out the mismatched colors of the truck bed, labeling it 'odd' and less aesthetically pleasing. @Beans_Bacon goes further, expressing disapproval by stating that converting a classic American truck to electric is 'unforgivable.' Concerns about the vehicle's capability are raised by @Rivian1958, who questions whether it can reach highway speeds, while @MWebb mentions the comparatively low horsepower of the electric motor which might make it feel underpowered compared to modern vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @shervinator appreciates the uniqueness of the vehicle, specifically noting the rare color and interior that should be preserved or restored. This highlights a recognition of the car's potential value and aesthetic appeal. The positive sentiment indicates a desire to see the vehicle in better condition and showcases an enthusiasm for the R107 model.
Neutral: @ROBCINLA (The Seller) clarifies various inquiries from potential buyers about the car's condition. They mention that while some repair work was done due to an accident, the rest of the paint is believed to be original. The seller also provides information regarding the A/C and heater functionality, indicating they have not tested the former, but the heater reportedly works. Additionally, they explain the absence of a Carfax report and confirm the maintenance records are available.
Negative: @kcohen911 raises concerns about the soft top's condition and mentions the necessity for a smog check, highlighting issues that may deter potential buyers. @bigsky47's request for a CARFAX report also indicates apprehension about the vehicle's history. The seller's admission that the smog will not pass in California presents a significant drawback for those looking to purchase the vehicle in that area, hinting at underlying challenges with compliance and condition.
|
 |
Positive: @JGuzman7_ (The Seller) is enthusiastic about offering a well-maintained 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe LT 4x4, which has low mileage and a clean history in California. His commitment to thorough maintenance is evident, with invoices available to assure potential buyers that the vehicle is road-ready. @Mudman3110 praises the vehicle's appearance, calling it a beauty and a clean ride, further adding to the positive perception of the Tahoe's condition. Additionally, @89lincolntc shares a personal story about his own experience with a similar truck, expressing that it's one of the best vehicles he has driven in winter, confirming that well-maintained units can provide significant value.
Neutral: Several interactions involve @JGuzman7_ (The Seller) updating potential buyers with new content. He mentions the posting of driving videos and 360 walkarounds of the Tahoe, which allow interested parties to assess its condition visually. The seller actively engages with the commenters, responding to inquiries and encouraging ongoing communication. @RMQ333 and @Waterskier98 contribute with reflective thoughts and questions about the vehicle's features, indicating a shared interest in the Tahoe's condition and performance.
Negative: No negative comments were recorded about the vehicle in the discussion. While no critical feedback or reservations were presented from the commenters, this absence may indicate either a strong consensus of appreciation for the Tahoe or a lack of active critique among the engaged community. Overall, the dialogue is heavily skewed towards positivity, reflecting genuine interest and endorsement of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received positive attention for its excellent condition after thorough preparations, including the installation of the LN Engineering IMS bearing solution and a comprehensive paint correction process backed by a Gtechniq 5-year ceramic coating. @professorgearhead praises it for its engaging driving experience, comfort on long drives, and overall handling. Many commenters, including @gtdwg and @turbopowered_gsr, express interest in the vehicle, with the latter indicating a desire to view it in person, highlighting the car's appeal to prospective owners.
Neutral: Some commenters are requesting clarification on specific details related to the vehicle's compliance and previous sale. For instance, @sarpkaya inquired about the reason the previous buyer failed to finalize the purchase, while @srodgrg seeks confirmation about the exhaust and smog equipment, reflecting a cautious approach from potential bidders. @amotorsports (The Seller) has specified that all necessary updates have been completed since the previous auction, including preparing the vehicle for compliance.
Negative: A few concerns have been raised about the vehicle’s cosmetic condition, notably by @europaisch, who observed signs of paint swirling and scratches in the photos, questioning the timing of the paint correction. This skepticism about the vehicle's visual appearance contrasts with the generally positive feedback found in other comments. However, @amotorsports (The Seller) has assured that the paint correction was carried out after the photos were taken, addressing the concerns raised.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Lambretta Li150, highlighting its quality and impressive restoration. @OldGuy noted that this model rides better than similar vintage Vespas and described it as a "killer build." Comments from @Martyn10 and @AbnMike underscored the scooter's meticulous refinishing, while @joebarthlow encouraged potential bidders to ride it rather than let it sit in a collection, praising its tastefulness and rideability. Enthusiastic remarks about the scooter's colors and mechanical upgrades were frequently mentioned, indicating a unanimous appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and performance.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions about the scooter's specifications and operations, with @radiojones asking for clarification on the gear-shifting mechanism. @Torchbearer also noted an impressive startup video that showcased the scooter's appearance in sunlight. The seller, @moto.borgotaro, provided detailed responses to questions and informed potential buyers about shipping options, indicating a proactive approach in communicating with interested parties. Overall, these neutral contributions seemed focused on gathering more information and expressing interest in the intricacies of the scooter's features.
Negative: While there were mostly positive and neutral comments, a few users expressed specific concerns. @radiojones initially showed confusion over the gearbox operation, which could indicate a potential learning curve for new riders unfamiliar with the mechanism. Although criticism was minimal, the nature of these comments suggests that while the scooter is generally well-received, some users may seek additional clarity on its features before bidding.
|
 |
Positive: The 2016 Td6 Land Rover Range Rover Diesel has received overwhelming praise from @Jpreston123 and various potential buyers for its luxurious features and excellent performance. The seller emphasizes the incredible off-road capability combined with a reliable turbo diesel engine that offers great fuel mileage and ample torque for towing. With a range of high-end options, including massaging seats, a Meridian sound system, and a panoramic roof, the vehicle is presented as a fully loaded luxury SUV, showcasing its value compared to competitors' offerings. The driving experience is described as remarkably smooth and comfortable, matching the expectations of luxury vehicle owners.
Neutral: @Jpreston123 addressed concerns regarding maintenance, especially about the timing belt service and air suspension functionality. While he mentioned that service records for specific past services were not available, he provided insights into the typical service costs and intervals for the Land Rover. The seller's transparency regarding potential future expenses, such as the replacement of the fuel tank belly pan, also contributed a neutral perspective by highlighting areas where buyers might need to prepare financially when considering the purchase of this model. Overall, the discussion reflects a candid approach from the seller about the vehicle's condition and upkeep.
Negative: Some potential bidders, like @bradleymarineservices and @GingerBuffett, raised concerns about possible issues, including rust on specific vehicle parts and the need for timing belt replacement. @Jpreston123 addressed these by providing explanations about the vehicle's history and condition, including the presence of minor surface rust rather than serious damage. Additionally, questions regarding the absence of the rear compartment folding cover and the vehicle's history as a non-smoker were posed by other commenters, highlighting that some potential buyers were seeking more reassurance about the vehicle's condition before bidding.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle for its design and condition. @Oregondave mentioned that the car is neat, while @justanamateur highlighted its status as a lifetime SoCal car with its original license plate. @Deke29 shared his positive experience with his own 911 purchase, expressing happiness with the performance and quality of the vehicle. Other users, including @vifferx and @MadRandy, commended the overall upkeep and service records of the car, indicating that it has been well cared for over the years. @01996tt even suggested that this model could become highly valued in the future, calling it a beautiful specimen.
Neutral: Multiple users inquired about specific maintenance details, especially regarding the IMS update and bore scoring, with requests for evidence such as borescope photos from @Oregondave and @theguygrm. The seller @ggero1 responded that he didn't have the requested borescope photos but acknowledged a lack of clarity on whether the IMS had been updated during the clutch work. There were also conversations around the service history, with @Ravdey asking for documentation dating back to the previous owner as well as records from @ggero1's time of ownership. The seller confirmed he has kept all records since he acquired the vehicle.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding the IMS update not being performed and the absence of a pre-purchase inspection (PPI). @Ravdey expressed disappointment that the seller could not confirm the IMS replacement and noted the potential risks of not having it inspected, suggesting that bore scoring could occur regardless of climate conditions. @Drwu88 also inquired about potential bodywork on the car, leading to an admission from @ggero1 about some touch-up work that had been done but no further paint work since. This raised questions about the vehicle's accident history and current condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Bigenca describes the vehicle as a nice intercooled Powerstroke, emphasizing its rarity as a short bed, suggesting it's a vehicle to watch. @LADHausler (The Seller) shares their personal connection to the truck, outlining their history as a 7.3 Powerstroke enthusiast who appreciates the upgrades and service records of the vehicle. @Zed330ti comments positively on the truck's clean appearance, noting the absence of overhead cab lights and running boards, enhancing its aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: @BuckeyeJR requests more pictures of the dashboard without the cover on, indicating curiosity about the condition. @Kokrabii asks for pictures of the inside of the bed with the tailgate down, showing interest in the truck's utility. @ROBSREDFORD acknowledges their love for the truck but raises questions about the conditions of the frame, rockers, floorboards, and other components, seeking clarification while expressing intent to bid.
Negative: @ROBSREDFORD points out the presence of rust on the frame and bumper, which raises concerns about the overall maintenance of the vehicle. The mention of potential issues with the rockers and the floorboards suggests a level of apprehension regarding the truck's longevity. @LADHausler's comments about the undercoating flaking may also indicate underlying concerns about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the 2014 Porsche Cayenne Diesel as an excellent all-around SUV known for its reliability, strong torque, and towing capabilities. @MJLMotorcars (The Seller) emphasizes its comfort for long-distance driving and its enjoyable driving experience, showcasing the loyal following it has among owners. Several commenters express excitement about the vehicle's strong presence on the market and potential purchase opportunities, with mentions of the vehicle's well-sorted condition enhancing buyer confidence.
Neutral: Comments from @MJLMotorcars (The Seller) indicate a thorough pre-sale preparation of the Cayenne, addressing known service items and presenting a detailed service history. Questions from @Bavaria911 regarding specific functionalities such as headlight adjustments and the condition of the oil pan demonstrate a shared interest in ensuring the vehicle is in optimal condition. The seller's quick responses to inquiries and the uploading of additional content like walk-around and driving videos are seen as positive engagement.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns regarding the vehicle's potential mechanical issues, particularly surrounding the oil pan and other known problems associated with diesel engines. @Bavaria911 raises critical questions about oil leaks and expensive repairs related to the radio and navigation system. While @MJLMotorcars reassures viewers that the vehicle has been thoroughly checked and no leaks are present, these concerns highlight the cautious approach some potential buyers take when considering used diesel vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a certain nostalgia and appreciation for the Corvette project, calling it a "cool old Corvette" with a "great color combination" (@JayKay2430) and a "nice project‘Vette for someone with patience and fortitude" (@Vettewine). Commenters like @WildOne highlighted the rarity of the Maroon over Maroon color, suggesting that despite its current state, it remains a good candidate for restoration. Others, such as @Stingroyer, contributed positively, emphasizing the potential to fix and tune the vehicle, adding that the original structure seems intact, which could offer promising restoration opportunities.
Neutral: Some commenters are seeking clarification on specific components and details regarding the car's condition. @Bruce159 and @LoneStarMotorsports inquired about the inclusion of the cat and other parts, while @croderique raised questions about the brakes and additional needed parts. The Seller, @danielbrwn590, addressed various concerns, expressing uncertainty about the original engine size, and confirming that while the brakes do not work, they can move the vehicle on a trailer. Additionally, the Seller mentioned the need for more detailed pictures to clarify certain aspects of the car, demonstrating a willingness to cooperate with interested parties.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's current state have been highlighted throughout the comments. Issues pointed out include inoperable brakes (@BigT77), possibility of surface rust on the frame (@AR66-67cars), and potential mouse damage from its years in storage (@19seventy3vette). @HandsomeDann69 noted a discrepancy between the VIN and the title, raising a red flag. Furthermore, @mjschneidy and others debated whether the car originally came with a big block, indicating a range of uncertainties regarding its authenticity and valuable components. Overall, many comments reflect a cautious optimism, acknowledging the car's potential while articulating the significant work needed to restore it.
|
 |
Positive: @Carguy624 (The Seller) mentions that he has owned the truck for 10 years, which is longer than any other vehicle he has had, and praises it as a great driver that tows well. @snafuracer expresses enthusiasm for the truck's appearance, particularly its mileage. @Alexx_mz compliments the unique color of the truck, expressing excitement about it. Additionally, @Carguy624 states that he includes extras such as paint, tires, and new floor mats, which could appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: @rthans inquires about the reason for the color change from the original grey paint and requests more pictures of the truck's details. This leads to an explanation from @Carguy624 that the color was changed because grey was becoming common, aiming for uniqueness. @thebobisgood asks for information regarding the check engine light and suspension photos, while @ThaGipper requests the actual check engine code; both engagements are met with informative responses from @Carguy624. The seller also confirms the truck's RWD configuration upon further inquiry from @Wiltonwarrior1.
Negative: @Carguy624 addresses concerns raised by @thebobisgood about the check engine light, noting it has been consistent over the years with a turbo-related code indicating a potential sensor issue. He expresses certainty that it's not a major concern, stating it clears up after longer drives. There is also a general concern among some commenters about the condition and performance of the vehicle, specifically regarding the potential impact of aftermarket parts on its functionality.
|
 |
Positive: Comments regarding the vehicle highlight admiration for its vintage charm and unique features. @SDCR appreciates the vintage aspect of the motorbike, while @BigT77 admires its restoration and quirky details, noting the interesting dashboard and fishtail tailpipe. @G5Nichols calls it an amazing and beautiful example of a Nimbus, praising its technology and design. The seller, @Maark70fish, showcases transparency about the bike's details and history, making the process approachable for potential buyers. Additionally, @MikesToys expresses enthusiasm for the exposed valve design, confirming the bike's uniqueness.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in inquiries regarding specifics about the bike. @CarlsonClassics asks about the bike's mileage, paint availability, and other technical details, displaying curiosity about the vehicle's history. @hyrax812 shares personal ownership experience indicating that the model appears well-maintained and valuable, while @ilikevelos seeks clarification on what distinguishes the sport model from others. @Maark70fish responds promptly to questions throughout, maintaining an informative dialogue and providing insights into the bike's specifications and maintenance.
Negative: On the downside, some concerns are noted about the motorcycle's mechanics and details. @Aridgerunner points out potential issues with the oil system, comparing it to a previous experience with a similar bike. Additionally, @professorgearhead mentions the bike's riveted steel frame being described as 'whippy,' which may imply concerns about sturdiness or handling. However, feedback mainly remains positive with nostalgia outweighing criticism, and the seller's transparency helps address some apprehensions.
|
42k-Mile 1991 Jaguar XJ-S Classic Collection V12 Convertible
SAJTW4846MC176681
Lot 224361
Private Party
 |
Positive: @VDPXJSC describes the vehicle as a gorgeous classic Jaguar that has received significant care and refreshing, highlighting the impressive upgrades like the Marrelli distributor, cooling and fuel systems, brakes, and new tires. They emphasize the vehicle's ability to attract attention and the fun it brings while driving. @jerrys.cars mentions that all mechanical repairs are complete and assures that everything is functioning properly, reinforcing the positive impression of the car's condition and readiness for use.
Neutral: @SWFLcarguy commends the mechanical repairs and inquires about the overall functionality of the vehicle, showing a practical interest in the car's current state. @oldisgoodtoo notes the stylishness of the XJS but asks if the seller performed the repairs themselves, while also questioning the absence of the original alloy wheels. @CheGuevara asks about the presence of a second set of keys and whether the vehicle comes with a tool kit or jack, indicating curiosity about the car’s accessories.
Negative: There are no negative comments present regarding the vehicle; all remarks received are either positive or neutral, focusing on its condition and functionality.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed great enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its rarity and low mileage. @Dmc356 emphasized that it is one of the lowest mile G8 GXPs available, with just 108 original miles, and noted its preservation as a future collectible. There were mentions of the vehicle's potential to command a high price at auction, with @newcarpro and @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 contributing thoughts on the financial value and rarity of such examples in pristine condition. Commenters like @LudicrousFool79 and @mr_smee appreciated the slicktop design and aggressive styling, indicating a general admiration for the car's aesthetics and performance features.
Neutral: The discussion around the G8 GXP also included inquiries about its history and condition, particularly around its mileage. @alexandariliya asked about the story behind the miles, while @Roadmaster expressed concerns about California emissions compliance and the transition necessary for registration. The seller, @Dmc356, provided specific details about the emissions compliance and the status of the car, indicating that it would be willing to provide documentation to address these concerns. There were also comments regarding the auction process and pricing, with some discussing the car's past market value and comparisons to other low-mileage vehicles.
Negative: In contrast, some comments revealed skepticism and disappointment regarding the practicality and decisions surrounding the vehicle. @hgpmatt67BAT voiced a concern about the need to drive the car to ensure it doesn't develop issues from lack of use, while @BeetleBailey63 humorously noted the temptation to drive such a valuable vehicle. Additionally, comments from @schnellmachen requested clarification on the car's smog status, expressing doubts about its readiness for sale in California. Other commenters such as @RussellJay wondered about the owner's restraint in keeping such a car in storage for so long, offering a critique on the there being no practical use of an exceptional vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praise the Pontiac Catalina for its nostalgic value and attractive design. @Dollycat3 describes it as an 'absolutely wonderful widetrack Pontiac Catalina' while @rofandofy highlights the car as 'comfortable, reliable, and fast.' @dugan4540 reminisces about owning a similar car passed down through his family and notes the interior appears very original. Additionally, @Pfeil mentions that the car looks very nice overall, with a favorable impression of its features and potential, particularly its historic significance in the automotive landscape.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the need for more detailed information and visuals related to the vehicle's condition and specifications. @JohnF1966, @Noisyboyz, and @carcrazy62GP all express that while the car seems solid, the presentation lacks sufficient pictures and information, particularly about the engine. @Janine_Johnson poses a series of questions about the engine and its overhaul, indicating a keen interest in understanding the vehicle's history and maintenance better. The Seller, @rzimmermaninc, is encouraged to provide more detailed invoices and clarifications regarding the vehicle's past issues, such as previous overheating problems.
Negative: Some criticism arises related to the vehicle's presentation and certain uncertainties regarding its condition. @Noisyboyz and @Hoppy18 note the insufficient photo documentation and an unclear claim regarding the odometer reading, hinting at potential issues with transparency about the mileage. @rzimmermaninc (The Seller) also faces scrutiny about the absence of overhaul receipts and an inconsistency in mileage details, prompting questions about how many miles the Seller has driven since purchase. Overall, there is a call for greater clarity to bolster buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received positive comments regarding its condition and features. @MercedesBmw, the seller, has highlighted that the car has been recently serviced and inspected, assuring potential buyers that it does not require any additional work. The inclusion of a refrigerator in the center console and heated and cooled ventilated seats has also been noted as appealing features, enhancing the vehicle's luxury aspect.
Neutral: Several inquiries have been made by potential buyers regarding specific features of the vehicle. @dreyer asked about the ventilation of the seats, and @mlowengrub inquired about the presence of a back-up camera. The seller, @MercedesBmw, addressed these questions directly, confirming that the vehicle indeed has ventilated seats and a functioning back-up camera, showcasing a willingness to provide detailed information.
Negative: There are no significant negative comments regarding the vehicle. The only concerns came from potential buyers asking about specific components and maintenance history. @RDM7533 raised questions about the tire date codes and brake components, indicating a desire for assurance on the vehicle's upkeep. @wharfingerick also asked about the smog certification, which was promptly affirmed by the seller as being current.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its aesthetics, highlighting aspects like its color combination and interior quality. @JGraham noted that it was a great-looking car and remarked on the expensive leather dash and headliner. @BMWMPaul also called it a nice E24 with an outstanding interior, suggesting that despite some modifications, it maintains a visual appeal. @amotorports added that the wing gives it a fighter jet look, indicating that some found the modifications to enhance the car's design.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on the car's specifications and modifications. Commenters like @Wayne9 and @milarsky raised questions regarding the originality of the paint and engine, as well as details about the modifications in the engine bay. @brannman and @ChrisSteineger expressed curiosity about the MoTeC ECU conversion and original components, while others were concerned about the potential impact of modifications on the car's value. There was a mix of opinions on the aesthetic choices, with some viewing the wing and aftermarket additions as fitting and others as detracting from the car's classic look.
Negative: Criticism was prevalent, particularly concerning the aftermarket modifications and overall condition of the vehicle relative to its mileage. @Dave_germany described the car as looking 'a little sad' and @philslooking cautioned that the non-legal ECU could significantly diminish its value. Commenters like @silverstang and @JBS27 expressed disappointment in the wing and body kit, suggesting they were unnecessary for the classic design. Others, like @bearofsa, raised concerns about a repaint and rust, indicating skepticism about the vehicle's overall quality. The tone of some critiques, such as @autoxfd, highlighted frustration with negative comments that lacked constructive feedback.
|
 |
Positive: @CAtra (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a beauty and fun to drive, suggesting that it has an appealing look and enjoyable handling. @kingseara shares his positive impression from seeing the truck in person, noting it looks great. Additionally, @CAtra mentions that the heated seats do provide a reasonable amount of warmth, confirming they are functional, and that the air conditioning runs cold, indicating reliable climate control features.
Neutral: @CAtra (The Seller) responded to several enquiries about the vehicle's heater core and other features. She clarified that the heater core was bypassed due to an anticipated move overseas and shared that she only drove about 10 miles daily to work. In response to concerns about the driver's door handle, she confirmed it is broken but expressed willingness to arrange viewings of the car, indicating an open attitude towards potential buyers.
Negative: @JMCLuimni raised concerns about the implication of the heater core being bypassed, suggesting it may point to deeper issues requiring significant repair, such as dashboard removal. @Ridgerovers and @ingenierocivil questioned the functionality of the heater and door handle, raising doubts about the vehicle's reliability. @jacekk expressed confusion over a symbol on the LCD screen, highlighting uncertainties regarding the vehicle's condition or potential malfunctions.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle mostly highlight its impressive appearance and design. @PulseCheck calls it a "Great looking M3!" while @Roadrunner_CT praises the vehicle's opening picture, describing it as "stunning." Additionally, @MidwestMint refers to it as "the perfect e46 m3" with tasteful ownership, indicating a positive reception among car enthusiasts.
Neutral: Some comments reflect a neutral stance, indicating curiosity and specific inquiries. @jai5w4 expresses interest but sees it as a "middle of the road example" regarding its mileage and history. @amir83 asks a straightforward question about the emissions label, and @piezopaul inquires about the vehicle's lug nut extensions, showing engagement without strong bias.
Negative: On the negative side, there are concerns regarding the vehicle's history and documentation. @DaveHasTrailer points out the lack of proof for significant maintenance claims, such as the double-VANOS system upgrade and rod bearing replacements. @Aweh and @Htown86er both raise questions about the vehicle's accident history and maintenance records, indicating some apprehension about the vehicle’s condition.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the appealing features of the 2009 Mercedes SL550 being auctioned, particularly its stunning Diamond Pearl white paint and AMG exterior package. @Lord_Fetta (The Seller) emphasizes its excellent condition, mentioning the installation of four brand new tires and TPMS sensors, which assure buyers that the vehicle is road-ready. Additionally, the seller promises engaging 4k videos showcasing the car and its features, including the neck scarf warmer, which adds to its desirability as a luxury sports car.
Neutral: There are some inquiries about the car's history, notably a moderate accident and the number of owners it has had. @HankHorders raises concerns about why the vehicle has had ten owners over 16 years, while @Tucsonmike questions the moderate damage reported in the car fax. @Rock26 and @Jfolckemer ask about warranties and any potential damage from the accident, reflecting a mix of curiosity and caution from potential buyers in regards to the car's reliability and overall condition.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects, there are concerns regarding the vehicle's past. @Eventer91302 expresses worry about structural repairs due to the accident history, questioning the quality of the repainting. The mention of multiple ownerships and the accident raises red flags for some potential buyers, leading them to be skeptical about the vehicle’s long-term reliability and safety. @HankHorders notes that the car's history might discourage people, indicating that the vehicle's previous problems could impact buyer confidence and interest.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters were highly impressed with the vehicle, praising its overall aesthetics and condition. @Mstang64 highlighted the appealing setup of the car, while @JohnF1966 noted that the professional photography made the car stand out brilliantly. Many loved the striking color combination, such as @Gmmuscleusa, who appreciated the red on red interior, stating it draws attention effortlessly. Additionally, @Chefgordiemac expressed excitement about the car's beauty, and @Prescott_Collection (The Seller) confirmed the car's excellent overall condition, reinforcing the notion that it is a well-maintained example.
Neutral: Several comments focused on seeking further details about the car or expressing curiosity regarding its features and specifications. @Oldwood asked about the age of the paint and any visible flaws, while @PipeSmoker11 inquired about the engine's specifications. @Stryker561 wanted to confirm the functionality of the AC and windshield wiper doors. @Prescott_Collection (The Seller) actively responded to inquiries and provided information, showing transparency about the car's condition and modifications, including its engine details and previous repairs.
Negative: Some commenters expressed dissatisfaction with the presentation of the vehicle, particularly concerning photo quality and potential damage. @Tobyallen criticized the overly saturated images, suggesting they might misrepresent the car. Additionally, there were concerns raised by @mjohn2134 about a possible damage in one picture, which @Stryker561 speculated might indicate issues with the fiberglass battery box. @GregoryCARL remarked on the presence of troublesome buyers, hinting at a negative sentiment toward potential negotiation tactics in the selling process.
|
 |
Positive: @Jswerve calls the vehicle a beauty, and @boaboyoz praises it as a wonderful example, wishing good luck for the auction. @Truck7600 (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm about the Chevelle, noting it has been in his collection for over 20 years and mentioning the lovely modern SS attributes added to the car. He highlights the upgrades that enhance its performance and comfort, and assures potential buyers that they will not be disappointed if they bring 'Heidi' home for Christmas.
Neutral: @ssterry acknowledges the beauty of the Chevelle but poses a question about the paint color change from its original Marina Blue to resale red. @JohnF1966 expresses a preference for the original configuration and mentions it has vintage features but appreciates the upgrades made. @DMess007 inquires if a driving video can be posted, showing interest in seeing the vehicle in action while @Ml2hip asks whether post-holiday pickup is possible and raises a question about the windows' functionality.
Negative: Some comments express concerns regarding the alterations to the vehicle. @Gs82 remarks if modifications must be made, they should be done properly, suggesting a level of skepticism about the changes. @Ml2hip raises a practical concern about the window alignment and their ability to seal correctly to prevent leaks, indicating a potential issue with the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @FXRcR1 commented on the remarkable preservation of the vehicle, expressing appreciation that it has maintained its beauty over the years. @Boatymcboatface admired the car as a well-loved example of an 89' Spur, highlighting the impressive condition of the vehicle and the strong relationships of its caretakers in the Midwest. @kostasd found the vehicle stunning, likening it to a new car and praising its solid painted top, while @ryangambrill was pleased about the replacement of hydraulic components, showcasing the vehicle's upkeep. @CoachBuilt regarded it as an exceptional time-capsule in cosmetic condition, appreciating its unique features and upgrades that have not been discarded over the decades.
Neutral: @SwissBliss raised curiosity about the spouse mentioned in the listing, pondering the reasons behind the details not included in the description. @Joe1589 requested clarification on the car's roadworthiness and expressed interest in seeing it in action. @Chach asked for more specifics about the vehicle's finish and blemishes, indicating a desire for clarity on the car's condition. @Le2254, the seller, confirmed the car is running and roadworthy, explaining the challenges of producing a driving video due to the snowy weather in Cincinnati, while also sharing the emotional background of the car's ownership.
Negative: @David_P noted the interior's impressive condition, likening it to brand new, but this comment also subtly implies expectations for other aspects of the vehicle. @Pennoak shared an anecdote about their own car, mentioning the necessary replacement of certain parts and expressing concern over whether the seller has repair receipts. They seemed hesitant to bid given their current collection. @JJJEEE pointed out the vehicle's important provenance, hinting at the high expectations associated with its history, while @gregorylv acknowledged the vehicle's background with anticipation for how the bidding would correspond to its respected owner.
|
 |
Positive: @TheOldGarage1Cali (The Seller) conveyed enthusiasm about the special edition bike, indicating that it is a limited production model inspired by the cb1100r. He highlighted its appealing colors and encouraged potential buyers to ask any questions, suggesting that he is eager to engage with interested parties.
Neutral: @Alex_1971 inquired about shipping options to Toronto, Canada, showing interest in purchasing the bike but needing additional logistical information. @Gearman11 asked if the seller is located in Southern California and whether local pickup would be possible for the winning bidder, indicating practical considerations regarding the purchase.
Negative: There were no negative comments or feedback about the vehicle provided in the summarized comments.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally admire the vehicle's beauty, with @Shoppy expressing that it is 'freakin’ beautiful' and mentioning its aesthetic appeal. @Speedmaster shares a desire for a second XK after seeing this specific car, suggesting its allure and charm. @Trmn8tr (The Seller) highlights the car's meticulously maintained condition, detailing the extensive repairs made, such as replacing the suspension control arms and engine mounts, which enhances the driving experience. There's also a sense of excitement about the fun driving experience, as noted by @Trmn8tr (The Seller).
Neutral: Some inquiries focus on specific vehicle features and operational questions. @dcartwright asks about the adaptive cruise control feature, to which @Trmn8tr (The Seller) clarifies that it is not included but mentions other features like adaptive headlights. @RickNC requests a video of the convertible top operation, and the seller assures him that it operates flawlessly. Additionally, @Panhandler from Canada inquires about specific electronic panel details and compliance stickers, indicating practical interest in the car's usability across regions.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's operational sounds are raised. @HairyDawg notes a lot of smoke during startup, questioning if it’s condensation or oil, along with concerns about valve chatter. The seller addresses these points by explaining the smoke was merely condensation from a cold start and assures that the vehicle runs smoothly without valve chatter. Moreover, @zippyzippy shares a past experience with coolant issues in a similar model and asks if there are any signs of leaks, to which @Trmn8tr (The Seller) responds confidently that there are none, further assuring potential buyers about the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @jlsKA510 described the vehicle as a 'sharp looking micro-rig' and wished good luck to potential buyers. @lb1 mentioned that the vehicle represents 'coolness overload' to him, further highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @nissanfan19 agreed, declaring the vehicle 'pretty cool'.
Neutral: @cmyklane (The Seller) provided logistical details throughout, describing the vehicle as fun to drive and useful, comparing it to a kei truck on steroids. He confirmed that the bed is approximately 9.5 feet long and the vehicle weighs about 2000 lbs. Additionally, @cmyklane provided feedback on performance, stating it can cruise comfortably at 55 mph and has reached over 70 mph on the highway. He reassured @patthepilot that it is fully street legal in the US and registered as a pickup truck in Florida.
Negative: @somezguy expressed skepticism about the vehicle's performance, recalling his experience with a similar model that was 'really slow'. @somezguy also questioned the weight of the vehicle, seeking additional clarity on its specifications. Meanwhile, @SWells679 raised concerns regarding the bed size in relation to common building materials, hinting at potential usability issues.
|
LS3-Powered 1995 Land Rover Range Rover County Classic LWB
SALHC1344SA654908
Lot 224384
Private Party
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle and its LS swap, appreciating the professional quality of the work. @Bullish stated, "So. Cool. GLWS," while @LIBAT highlighted that the price of $21K for the swap was reasonable compared to the work involved, giving kudos to VR Garage. @wylekilson, the seller, noted the improved engine output of 430hp and 425 lb-ft torque, which was well-received among potential buyers, indicating a strong performance upgrade with the swap.
Neutral: Commenters sought more information about various aspects of the vehicle. @nucleonic raised a point about the financial justification of the swap, questioning if it made sense economically. @ClassicFlyRodder offered suggestions for further improvements and pointed out that there were still restoration needs in areas such as the interior and potential rust risks, prompting a discussion of necessary inspections. Meanwhile, @dps inquired about repairs needed for the radio, air conditioning, and tachometer, showing interest in maintaining the vehicle's functionality post-sale.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about the vehicle's condition and potential issues. @116610LV asked about rust or corrosion, highlighting a key area of worry for potential buyers. @microshroom's inquiry about the rear seat functionality indicates that there might be limitations that could affect usability. Furthermore, @wylekilson addressed various repair needs mentioned by commenters, including air conditioning and stereo installation, implying that while the vehicle is impressive, it still requires attention to certain components to maximize its value.
|
 |
Positive: @Gearguy71 indicates that the Colorado runs perfectly, is entirely rust-free, and has been maintained through regular oil changes. The vehicle was previously owned by an older widow whose husband took great care of it, investing in upgrades like new tires and a touchscreen stereo system, ensuring it's in excellent condition. The seller highlights that this truck is rare, with only 123 units made in its configuration, making it an attractive choice. Furthermore, @Gearguy71 reassures potential buyers by stating that the truck has no leaks, minor past accident history, and is fully maintained without the need for any repairs.
Neutral: There were several inquiries from potential buyers about various aspects of the truck. @Uby67vw1958 asked about the AFM in the engine, while @2alpo inquired about the original wheels and how the badges were blacked out. @ck_joel sought clarification on the type of undercoating applied, and @gravel56 questioned why the title is listed as a replacement. @Kutya also wanted confirmation regarding whether the vehicle is 4x4. @Gearguy71 responded to these comments, providing detailed information, including that the truck has a professional undercoating and confirming its maintenance history.
Negative: A concern was raised by @vnmus04 regarding the discrepancy between the price @Gearguy71 claimed to have paid for the truck ($15,000) and the public record price of $9,500 in Ohio, implying potential misrepresentation for tax purposes. Additionally, @gravel56 displayed skepticism about the title's replacement status, questioning its significance. Despite @Gearguy71's reassurances, the varying claims about the purchase price and title raised doubts among some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters are enthusiastic about the Lexus LS430, expressing admiration for its performance and historical significance. @jamison1811 calls it 'one heck of a car,' and relates to the pride of owning a similar model. @Adbleier and @Gslide share excitement over the driving experience, highlighting how much fun they find in driving the vehicle. @JoesOlds mentions that this model and its specified mileage will be a great value for the eventual buyer, emphasizing the car's reputation for reliability and low maintenance costs.
Neutral: The seller, @MBHAuto, provides detailed information about the car's maintenance history and actions taken to ensure it is in excellent condition for the new owner. They respond thoughtfully to inquiries about the vehicle's features and past incidents, indicating a proactive approach towards transparency. Comments from @Shan318 and @Rus inquire about the smog certification process and proper maintenance over the years, displaying a need for further clarity which the seller addresses professionally.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the vehicle's maintenance history and previous damage. @Bruce_ asks about potential oil leaks, showing doubt about the current condition of the vehicle, while @Shan318 recalls a prior incident with spilled soap in the trunk that may have affected electronic components. The conversation also hints at worries regarding the car's upkeep before its next 30K miles, as noted by @Shan318, which reflects skepticism about the documentation of past services.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed overwhelming enthusiasm for the Hot Rod Snow Blower, with many calling it a cool build and a unique vehicle that truly stands out. @cruisewoodward described it as "awesome," while @usdcrs noted it as the ultimate vehicle for snowy car gatherings. Several commenters found the idea of owning such a device appealing, with @LMGun exclaiming that snow would be too scared to fall on their driveway with it, emphasizing its impressive capabilities. @Poolzilla1966 even contemplated the feasibility of owning it in a warm climate, suggesting its design transcends utility into the realm of novelty and fun.
Neutral: Several comments highlighted practical aspects of the snow blower, including inquiries into its dimensions and functionality. @MikesBankAcct asked about its height, and @GRG1 wanted insight into its transmission specifications. The seller, @Camotubebender, provided detailed answers about the snow blower's size and discussed some of its quirks, including a small hydraulic leak. The discussion also touched on the machine's weight, steering abilities, and additional features, with @Rosin inquiring about shipping logistics and functionality.
Negative: Conversely, some commenters displayed skepticism or humor regarding the snow blower's practicality for their personal situations. @3Pedalonly humorously noted they had no use for such a massive machine, while @AlfistiNY suggested it seemed more suitable for rural residents. @anfojo inquired about shipping costs to a warm climate like Key Largo, hinting that on colder seasons, the snow blower's appeal might be limited. Additionally, some users like @singlespeed highlighted concerns about needing utility beyond wintertime, implying the vehicle might not be a sound investment for all situations.
|
 |
Positive: The overall sentiment about the Porsche Cayenne S is largely positive, with multiple commenters praising its aesthetics and condition. @That_bex noted that it's one of the cleanest 2008 models they've ever seen, while @RecoveringAtty commented on the beautiful color combination that is even more striking in person. The seller, @allin938, takes pride in the meticulous maintenance of the vehicle, highlighting upgrades like a new battery and recent coolant pipe replacement, ensuring the car is ready for its next owner. Additionally, many appreciate the luxurious interior features such as the genuine wood trim and comprehensive factory options included with the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters had questions regarding the specifics of the vehicle and its included features. @thebingster inquired about the original wheel size and whether they would be part of the sale, while @hausblau expressed a desire for a particular set of factory wheels. @GL81 asked about the coolant pipe replacement process, specifically questioning if it was leaking prior to the work being done. The seller responded to these queries, clarifying that the vehicle is equipped with current 22-inch wheels, which are non-negotiable in this sale, and that the coolant pipe service was performed as a preventative measure, allaying concerns about potential issues.
Negative: Some concerns came up regarding additional features that might be missing from the vehicle. @That_bex specifically asked about the absence of a backup camera and parking sensors, which the seller confirmed are not included. Other potential buyers, like @GL81 and @josedluca, asked about the state of various mechanical parts, such as compression tests and leak checks. While the seller reassured potential buyers about the car's excellent condition, these comments highlight that there are factors that some prospective buyers may consider as drawbacks when evaluating the value of the vehicle.
|
Supercharged 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 ZR2 Crew Cab 4×4
3GCUDHEL1RG166981
Lot 224378
Private Party
 |
Positive: @m60 praised the truck for being great, expressing a desire for it to be black. @cmadams1983 (The Seller) responded positively, suggesting a wrap and noting that the truck boasts a powerful 650 HP engine. @tp808 complimented the truck's looks, mentioning their own similar model while emphasizing the beauty of the vehicle.
Neutral: @agskam inquired about whether the 6.2L motor had been cleared of a GM recall. @cmadams1983 (The Seller) confirmed that it was cleared and that the oil cap and oil type were changed as part of the inspection process. @scott.mikuszewski asked about the completion mileage of the suspension and motor modifications, to which @cmadams1983 (The Seller) explained that the modifications were done off the showroom floor at under 50 miles, followed by personal adjustments made locally.
Negative: @tp808 offered a cautionary note regarding the engine recall, stating that although they received clearance from GM, the modification only involved a simple oil change and did not solve the underlying issue. They mentioned that GM's engine tolerances may still be problematic despite attempts to rectify them. @tp808 further pointed out that their dealer has three similar vehicles with the same issues not yet included in the recall.
|
 |
Positive: @Duff451 (The Seller) has provided an extensive overview of the vehicle's history and excellent condition. Commentors like @JSteinaway praised the GMC Yukon, asking if it would be suitable for a long trip, to which @Duff451 confirmed its readiness for cross-country travel after successfully completing 800-mile trips. Additionally, @Noisycow commented on the vehicle being a clean and nice rig, suggesting that bidders should expect the price to rise due to its appealing features.
Neutral: The Seller shared details about various features and functionalities of the truck, including the towing capacity of 7,000 pounds and the presence of heavy-duty options, which may interest potential buyers. @gauldingr suggested including both sets of wheels at no charge with a successful bid, indicating a willingness to negotiate and enhance the deal. There were also inquiries about the original factory radio and the performance of the rear window latch, showing interest in specific vehicle features.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns or suggestions rather than outright negativity. @gauldingr raised a concern about the potential risk of damaging the interior if a second set of tires is included with the auction. While there were no explicitly negative remarks about the vehicle itself, the questions regarding specific features suggest that some potential buyers might have reservations that could affect their bidding decisions.
|
 |
Positive: Several commentors expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its potential as a restoration project. @WEM called it a 'true dream machine,' while @XKLover mentioned it as an 'easy restoration,' indicating that, with the right numbers, the car could fetch a good price. @threeducs3 remarked that the car looked good and had a straight body with lots of extras, suggesting that it could be an excellent project for an experienced hobbyist. Also, @tim_t mentioned the structural integrity of the car, implying that it may not be as bad as it looks and that many parts are readily available for restoration.
Neutral: Several comments were made inquiring about specific details of the vehicle. @ColumbiaMotorAlley and @SYAustralia asked for the numbers on the cylinder heads and the presence of the engine block, while @mwagon requested further images of the frame and interior. @kelphelben (The Seller) provided some information, confirming the presence of the engine block but noting there was no data plate on the car and that improvements in presentation were needed. The collection of parts seemed ambiguous to some, with suggestions for better organization and visibility of included items to assist bidders.
Negative: Despite general interest, several comments pointed out significant concerns regarding the vehicle's presentation and missing information. @tim_t criticized the lack of clear photos of critical areas, suggesting that debris like rags and cardboard be removed for a better assessment. @threeducs3 shared similar thoughts, stating that a cleaner presentation could yield higher bids. Additionally, some users, such as @Jaguar3.4, emphasized the challenge of restoring such a vehicle and that the undertaking would require considerable skill, time, patience, and financial investment.
|
 |
Positive: @shervinator noted the vehicle's unique color combination, highlighting that it isn't common, which could appeal to buyers looking for something distinctive. @jpatton10 (The Seller) provided detailed information, emphasizing the rust-free condition of the body and underbody, which are strong indicators that the vehicle has not been exposed to harsh winter conditions. Furthermore, @jpatton10 assured potential buyers that the air conditioning is original and functioning properly, having been recharged recently, which adds to the vehicle's reliability and comfort for future owners.
Neutral: Several commenters asked questions regarding the vehicle's maintenance and condition. @southstreet100 inquired about the functionality of the air conditioning, while @Smarkowitz asked about the title status, which @jpatton10 confirmed is clean and in hand. Additionally, @SteveMar raised queries about the driver's seat adjustment and oil leaks, leading to a detailed response from @jpatton10 that reassured potential buyers about the car's overall mechanical condition and functioning features like power equipment, brakes, and suspension.
Negative: Some concerns were expressed by commenters, with @Snoopy423 specifically asking about potential oil issues and @elly18 suggesting that the vehicle might need a new exhaust system. However, @jpatton10 dismissed these worries by confirming that the exhaust system is complete and solid, and assured that the oil only weeps slightly without any drips, indicating low maintenance issues. Despite these concerns, all functional aspects of the vehicle were addressed positively to mitigate any negative impressions.
|
 |
Positive: @CRUSH highlights the vehicle's low mileage and Cummins engine, expressing enthusiasm for its performance. @Murfman appreciates the truck's lineage, noting that a similar model was sold at the same dealership, and wishes the seller luck with the sale. @Oliver2711 compliments the truck's appearance, indicating it is visually appealing and well-maintained.
Neutral: @JHernandez, addressing the seller, requests additional technical details regarding the engine block and fuel pressure, showing interest in the vehicle's mechanics. @Tkingcummins (The Seller) responds with specifics about the truck's condition and restoration work, providing a backstory that enhances the truck's attractiveness to potential buyers. @Oliver2711 asks questions regarding specific components and measurements, indicating a desire to understand the vehicle better and its compatibility with their needs.
Negative: @Givnasty expresses disappointment that the vehicle isn't a 12V model and mentions a wreck on the vehicle's record, implying that these issues might affect its desirability. Although it’s suggested that the truck should still perform well in the market, this concern casts a shadow on its overall appeal. @Oliver2711 also sounds uncertain about whether the truck's length will fit in their garage, indicating practical reservations about purchasing the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Mainlymuscle expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, inquiring if there is a Brewster green version available. @Rcubed337 complimented the car's build quality and expressed interest in the non-stock seats installed in the vehicle. @knotleykcorb praised the work done on the vehicle's top, indicating appreciation for its restoration. @redboots shared a nostalgic story about their own Formula 400, expressing a heartfelt connection to the model. @Batman1961 shared fond memories of their own similar vehicle, admiring the features and rich history of the Firebird series. @Slix45 described the Formula as beautiful, expressing admiration and urgency in a lighthearted way.
Neutral: Comments from @DonEnic (The Seller) provided technical details and insights about the vehicle, including specifics about the engine setup, past ownership, and the history of its construction. The seller clarified that the T-Tops were grafted from a 78 Trans AM and that the original rear axle has a 3:42 ratio Posi. They affirmed that this particular Formula is one of only 502 manufactured in 1973, which piqued the interest of onlookers. A few commenters, such as @David_P and @gto3deuces, shared general opinions about the Formula series and its comparisons to the Trans-Am without direct comments about this specific car.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @gtaylorwill about possible bondo cracking on the rear driver side, hinting at potential restoration issues. They questioned the integrity of the bondo on the rear roof pillar, showing doubt about the quality of the repair work. Additionally, @wannabid55 mentioned a dislike for the tall seats, feeling they looked out of place in the Firebird design. This feedback underscored mixed feelings about the modifications made to the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the condition and presentation of the vehicle. @OhU8one2 noted that the vehicle appears very nice and offered good luck with the auction. @Westdawg1 appreciated the detailed presentation, emphasizing that it shows even minor flaws and deemed the vehicle a nice example for its age. @Nashvegas complimented the honest representation of the vehicle, mentioning its great condition for its mileage and praising the unaltered underbody, which reflects well on the previous owner's care.
Neutral: Some commenters asked clarifying questions about the vehicle's history and specifics. @Eldonkey inquired about the year of the vehicle and head gasket status, while @Colin_D asked about potential fluid leaks and the fog lights' functionality. Additionally, @lostmonster sought information on the maintenance history and the head gasket test, indicating a desire for transparency regarding the vehicle's upkeep.
Negative: There were no strongly negative comments regarding the vehicle, but some raised concerns about specifics that might have implications regarding maintenance. @Eldonkey and @Colin_D both expressed skepticism regarding the availability of service records and the fog lights not working, which could indicate underlying issues. However, these comments did not overshadow the overall positive sentiment shared by many about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @CKart loves the unique brown-gray leather of the vehicle and @gscharnagl appreciates the rare color combination. @MrMagoo2 mentions the impeccable service history and outstanding condition, stressing that the car is a statement piece. The Seller, @CambioManuale, affirms the rarity of the car's color combination and highlights its all-original condition free from rust or body damages, giving potential buyers confidence in its quality. @Static50 shares enthusiasm for the color, as they own a similar vehicle. @Sdaffre admires the car's beauty and inquires about the functionality of the front seat massages, indicating a positive perception of the luxury features of the vehicle.
Neutral: The Seller, @CambioManuale, engages with potential buyers by answering questions and offering insights into the car's features and history. @MrMagoo2 asks about potential flaws and any unusual smells, and @shoggy1970 inquires about the functionality of the night view assist. @maxs1 expresses concerns about the ABC suspension following a rodeo test, while @Hargo shares experience with their own vehicle, suggesting a community discussion around the reliability of these cars. The Seller reassures potential buyers by detailing the car's maintenance and care, addressing common questions about features such as Bluetooth integration and rear climate control.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the functionality of the massage feature in the front seats, with @Sdaffre specifically mentioning it is disconnected due to an air leak in the backrest of the driver seat per @CambioManuale's explanation. @maxs1 expresses skepticism about the rodeo test used on the suspension, indicating a potential risk of leaks from the system being stressed, while acknowledging the reliability of the W221 model over earlier versions. @bringatrailer notes the removal of mention about past damage from the Carfax report, suggesting that transparency may be an issue in how the car's history is presented.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praised the Tahoe, stating it is a great vehicle, while @Doug.Roberts echoed this sentiment by calling it a good-looking Tahoe. @conus also expressed agreement with these comments and showed appreciation for the seller, highlighting the positive impressions of the Tahoe.
Neutral: @Mcfly1985 (The Seller) shared a test drive video in response to inquiries about the vehicle. @gbaker783 asked about the functionality of the 4x4 system, and @Mcfly1985 (The Seller) confirmed that everything, including the 4x4, works properly. Additionally, @WIZZZZ inquired about the vehicle's registration status, to which @Mcfly1985 (The Seller) responded that the registration is current until July 2026.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: @yma10 expresses a sense of eagerness for the bidding process, hoping for a high bid of 77777 to see the vehicle find a good home. @Youngtimerclassics shares enthusiasm for the vehicle's specifications, particularly appreciating the black color and cloth interior. @08LCI6SMTA43 describes the vehicle as an excellent choice, praising various features such as its brilliant black color, manual transmission, low mileage, and lightweight design, emphasizing that it is definitely a car worth buying. The seller, @Rustyl2010, confirms the smoothness of the car's drive and mentions he is selling it to fund an upgrade to his Supra, showcasing his positive view of the RX-7.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @WesternRedCedar and @Kazyouu, ask for detailed information regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly about the compression test results and the condition of the paint. @WesternRedCedar mentions previous compression test results may have aided the auction but suggests potential bidders would feel more reassured with updated data. The seller, @Rustyl2010, assures that a new compression test has been ordered and will be provided soon, as well as offering to clarify any concerns related to the vehicle's aesthetic condition and providing videos to help with the sale.
Negative: Concerns about the paintwork were raised by @Kazyouu, who speculated that the passenger door might have been repainted due to a dull appearance compared to the driver's side. @Kazyouu requested clarity on the issue, which @Rustyl2010 attempted to address by stating that the car has been ceramic coated and is original, offering to provide more images to clear any misunderstandings. Additionally, @WesternRedCedar pointed out some confusion regarding the car's mileage documentation, and @dhoeg explained a perceived issue with the vehicle's bodywork, asserting that the sheet metal was concave, and there isn't a defect, indicating some skepticism about the car's perceived imperfections.
|
 |
Positive: The Porsche 911 Turbo being sold by @Por4mance is praised for its exceptional performance and meticulous engineering. @GentlemanSmuggler commended the car's showroom condition and noted the owner's passion for perfection, highlighting how well-modified and beautiful the vehicle is. Additional comments from @GT3Buddy and others reflect a strong confidence in the car's quality and the modifications made, asserting it as one of the most impressive 991 Turbos seen.
Neutral: The seller, @Por4mance, transparently addresses the condition of the vehicle, mentioning a known issue with the PCM system that causes it to briefly reboot every five minutes, a concern echoed by @toadsalesman who suggests it might be an easy fix. Questions regarding the car's features and modifications, such as the presence of ceramic coating and black vinyl wraps from @wrxsti87, indicate a discussion around its aesthetic touches and modifications, including the repainting of some parts of the vehicle after stone chips.
Negative: Despite the overall positive impression, there are concerns regarding the car's PCM issue as indicated by @toadsalesman who shares a past experience of a similar problem. Additionally, @wrxsti87 mentions potential paintwork issues on the passenger side rear quarter panel based on paint measurements, raising questions about the vehicle's entire cosmetic integrity. These mixed sentiments hint at some underlying apprehension about the car's maintenance history even amidst its praised performance.
|
 |
Positive: @GCCars (The Seller) highlighted the charm of the 1958 Morris Minor van, expressing excitement for its new ownership after a well-executed restoration. Commenters like @porkpiehat and @tim_t also appreciated the vehicle's potential, suggesting it would be an excellent advertising tool or delivery vehicle, given its nostalgic appeal. @Andertonm reminisced about their positive experiences owning a similar model, noting its reliable performance and unique looks, describing it as a 'real attention getter' and a versatile workhorse.
Neutral: Comments on the vehicle also touched on its practicality and functionality. @Andertonm discussed modifications made over their years of ownership, illustrating the van's adaptability for different needs. @GCCars (The Seller) noted the van's utility for hauling items, suggesting potential uses in business contexts. There were mentions of specific features, such as the load capacity and design elements, including the intriguing side window setup that could influence exterior noise levels.
Negative: However, some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition. @Andertonm warned potential buyers to verify the smooth operation of the transmission, as well as potential leaks from the rain gutters that could lead to rust issues, which he referred to as 'cancer' for the vehicle. While the van holds nostalgic value and offers a unique aesthetic, these maintenance issues could deter some buyers or necessitate additional investment.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg expressed that the car features a "majestic color combination," highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @Euro_Classica (The Seller) described the 14 Bentley GTC Speed as being in very nice shape with low miles, emphasizing the silky smoothness and great sound of the engine, along with crisp transmission shifts. They also mentioned the car's readiness for both leisurely and more adventurous driving, which could attract potential buyers looking for a versatile vehicle.
Neutral: @Remy22 inquired about viewing the car in person, showing interest but without clear enthusiasm or detriment. @MJN noted a small blemish on the passenger door while appreciating the beauty of the vehicle, indicating some minor concerns without dampening overall appreciation. Several commenters, including @Yuppster and @SeeksSportinWheels, sought additional information regarding service records, keys, and tire conditions, which conveys diligence typical of potential buyers.
Negative: @monteman, @Shemagra, and @CometGirl427 raised concerns about the vehicle, questioning maintenance records, the condition of the soft top, and the presence of unclear marks in photos. @Shemagra's comment included the speculation that a handprint in a photo could be a sign of neglect, which might imply worries about the car's upkeep. @Trattoriagio also asked about the last service date, indicating a lack of clarity regarding the car's maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle and its history. @JOHNAM shared nostalgia from owning multiple models in the past, hoping that this one can be part of his collection. @DrBob42 praised the rarity of the unaltered Starliner, while @56PackardMan noted the significance of the original Studebaker engine and its details from the Vernon Assembly Plant. @MWebb also appreciated the classy black on black color scheme, indicating that it would be enjoyable to drive as is. Others, including @bda60 and @ramblinwreckidaho, echoed similar sentiments about the overall aesthetic and historical value of the car.
Neutral: Several comments provided information and clarification about the vehicle's specifications and features. @stargazer1, the seller, responded to inquiries regarding the car's odometer history and repaint details, revealing that the odometer likely rolled over. There's also a discussion about the original dashboard color and the types of modifications that have been made to the car, including the updated transmission and the possibility of 12-volt modifications. Commenters such as @Socal86 and @Dusey asked for more pictures and details about the car's inner workings, displaying a keen interest in its mechanical aspects.
Negative: Despite the enthusiasm, some commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's condition and modifications. @JOHNAM questioned the accuracy of the mileage given the repaint and possible engine compartment work. @Dusey sought clarification on whether the wipers and heater motors were updated to 12 volts, indicating potential concerns about the modifications made to ensure compatibility. Furthermore, the mounting issue with the brake line splitter noted by @Dusey raised questions about the car's safety and operational readiness, highlighting that potential buyers have practical considerations alongside their admiration for the classic vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @ejoak appreciates the unique build, expressing admiration despite concerns about fitting due to height. @WishfulThinker23 commends the practicality of the design, stating that the build's focus on functionality over flashy paint is refreshing. @mikeor loves rat rods and @Valiantjim praises the creative hot rod design, highlighting the clever engineering behind the rear suspension and the innovative nature of the build. Furthermore, @Bauback admires the completely custom construction and the thoughtful placement of components, indicating a high level of craftsmanship.
Neutral: @CharlesKremer3, the seller, reassures potential buyers about the spaciousness of the vehicle, mentioning that adjustments can be made for taller drivers. He also clarifies the windshield material confusion, stating that it features safety glass, and explains the function of the lever on the fender for interested commenters. Additionally, he addresses inquiries about adding features like windows and seat belts, noting that while the hardware isn't currently present, it could be installed.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns, with @Valiantjim critiquing the trend of patina finishes and suggesting that a cleaner look might be preferable. @tortmanus raises a question about inconsistencies in the windshield material depicted in the vehicle's images, creating uncertainty for potential buyers. @bobdole asks for clarification on the chop of the car, noting a thickness in the body line that might be perceived as a flaw rather than a design choice, while acknowledging it could be a stylistic decision.
|
 |
Positive: @Owenry expressed excitement about the vehicle being showcased on BAT, highlighting its rarity with a California title and road use plate, indicating it is a special find for enthusiasts. @Paschal complimented the bike with a simple remark, noting it has the 'Best name ever!' Furthermore, @Ypss36 shared a nostalgic connection, revealing personal history with the bike and praising its interesting legacy, while also wishing luck to prospective buyers.
Neutral: @bobski raised a lighthearted question about whether the vehicle could make it to Aspen, hinting at its intended use. @hhong51, the seller, provided some practical information about the vehicle, mentioning that the headlight lamp bulb wasn't working and that the chrome condition was as visible in the photos, setting realistic expectations for potential bidders. @Owenry also sought information from experts regarding the authenticity of the bag on the bike, suggesting an ongoing discussion about its historical relevance.
Negative: @gasandgears dismissed the vehicle's capability for climbing hills, stating a 50cc 2 stroke wouldn't be able to handle them and emphasizing that a 4-stroke with good torque would be necessary. @BigT77 warned about the challenges of keeping up on highways and the risk of kids wanting to ride it, which may deter potential buyers. @Mondmann humorously challenged @gasandgears' comments on the torque, indicating some disagreement among commenters.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express a fondness for the vehicle, particularly its DeLorean heritage, with @Thatsagreatride simply stating that it's a great ride. The nostalgia surrounding the car is evident with references to movies like BTTF by @Vehicross99, who notes that such references never get old. @cruise2728 provides detailed insights, appreciating the specific features of the DeLorean model, while @cdrusn shows support through enthusiastic thumbs up. @mitchellfstafford1605 (The Seller) adds a humorous touch by mentioning Hollywood's involvement in modifying the car's aesthetics for films.
Neutral: @speedster356 playfully inquires about the flux capacitor, which adds humor but is not taken seriously by others. @steel-and-fire requests more pictures of the frame to gauge the condition of the undercoating, indicating a practical interest in the car's maintenance history. @Paschal points out the historical context of the DeLorean's manufacturing in Northern Ireland, which may appeal to those interested in the car's background. Requests for more information and insights about the vehicle's specifications are a constant theme among comments.
Negative: Constructive criticism is somewhat lacking, as some users have been flagged for non-constructive comments. @DrunkenGoose raises an inquiry about the noise upon starting the vehicle, which was addressed by @mitchellfstafford1605 (The Seller) explaining it is a seatbelt buzzer. Others, however, like @IMissMySaab, were noted for comments deemed unhelpful. Comments focusing on frivolous questions, such as @ibuprofen asking about flashing lights, contribute to a sense of misalignment in serious discussions regarding the vehicle's features.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is highly regarded among commenters, with @zdoctor appreciating its compact size, muscular stance, and rare sunroof for a first-year model. @ZSRCollections shared their positive experience owning the M2 for four years, highlighting its reliability on the track and during spirited drives. This F87 M2 is also recognized as one of the last true BMWs, combining lightweight design, a powerful inline-6 turbo engine, and excellent driving dynamics, appealing to car enthusiasts like the P1 Motorcars team who emphasize their credibility and passion for cars.
Neutral: The seller, @p1_motorcars_ltd, addresses concerns and inquiries from potential buyers, including details about the vehicle's ownership history and modifications. They clarify that the suspension remains untouched, and any necessary adjustments for U.S. compliance regarding the speedometer are included in the sale price. Additionally, the sellers emphasize ease of purchase for both U.S. and Canadian buyers with comprehensive shipping and documentation services included, signaling transparency and a commitment to customer service.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's history, particularly regarding an accident mentioned by @browsing3, who requested clearer documentation on the matter. The seller responded by explaining that the accident claim was for $0 on the Canadian CARFAX and offered to clarify the situation with better evidence as there were problems with the initial blurry images. This aspect raises potential doubts for buyers about the vehicle's past but is addressed by @p1_motorcars_ltd as a common misinterpretation in Canadian reports.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight that the 2016 BMW 528i M Sport is an exceptional vehicle, described by @GulfStreamMotorCars (The Seller) as the absolute finest example of its kind. The seller emphasizes that it is a one-owner car with just 12,000 original miles, and they suggest it could pass for brand new. They mention that the vehicle has recently been serviced and has new Pirelli tires with only 300 miles on them. Additionally, its original paint condition is confirmed by paint meter readings, making it a rare find among similar models.
Neutral: Several interactions from potential buyers indicate interest in more information about the vehicle. @borzoo inquired about delivery costs to LA, while @westelm11 asked if they could see the car in person. @GulfStreamMotorCars (The Seller) responded positively, inviting @westelm11 to visit and providing a method for them to contact the seller. Another potential buyer, @MattFarley, also reached out for the location of the vehicle, receiving confirmation that it is in West Palm Beach, Florida. This suggests that there is an active engagement from interested parties looking for further details.
Negative: There are no negative comments recorded related to the vehicle. All comments reflect a positive interest in the BMW 528i M Sport, with no criticism or concerns raised by the commenters. The seller maintains a confident tone about the car's condition and rarity, solidifying its appeal without any indication of dissatisfaction from potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a genuine admiration for the 1953 MG TD, with many users highlighting its outstanding restoration quality and aesthetic appeal. @Andrew_Leeson remarked on the beauty of the car, while @Baddogdesmo emphasized the love and artistry put into its restoration. @hankgiffin described it as potentially the nicest TD available, commenting on the meticulous attention to detail. @Dbran6172 shared sentiments about the craftsmanship, and @Miatadon praised the car's perfection. Overall, comments from multiple users express excitement and appreciation for the car's design and restoration.
Neutral: Several users provided observations and insights about the vehicle that reflected a neutral tone. @morganplus8 noted the non-original wood dash but recognized its visual appeal. Questions were raised about the color of the gauges and storage of the side curtains, facilitating a discussion about the car's features with @Jperell providing clarifications. @IanJ expressed a personal stylistic preference for a two-tone color scheme while acknowledging the car's beauty. @LouFifer highlighted the ingenious design of the side curtain storage compartment, emphasizing its function without negativity.
Negative: Despite the numerous positive comments, a few users expressed reservations. @BrgBerns speculated that the car might not be driven much despite its beauty and questioned its practicality. @Raptor humorously noted that his dog desired the car, possibly reflecting a sentiment of unattainability. There were hints of skepticism from @morganplus8 regarding the perfect restoration being a bit too polished, while @hueyhoolihan playfully critiqued the storage method of the side curtains, suggesting it might be an inconvenience. Overall, while the critiques were light-hearted, they indicated that not everyone viewed the vehicle as a completely flawless investment.
|
 |
Positive: @Fargin commented positively on the car's color, noting that the green looks great. @LouFifer praised the restoration, stating that the interior is tastefully done to complement the exterior color, and he added that the owner should be proud of the work done by their son. Additionally, @LouFifer mentioned that the car drives as expected and appreciated the upgrade to a 12v Alternator, indicating satisfaction with the performance and modifications.
Neutral: @Sue_22888 (The Seller) addressed inquiries about the vehicle, explaining the heating system does not have a gas or aftermarket heater but maintains factory heating elements. She also provided details about the paint job, including the types of paint used and the context around the restoration process. Comments about the ride height and wheel configuration were acknowledged, with @Sue_22888 mentioning included parts for adjustment and clarifying the wheel sizes.
Negative: @gauldingr raised concerns about signs of body damage and an oily engine based on photos, prompting @Sue_22888 (The Seller) to explain that the damage was pre-existing and the oil issue was due to an uncleaned leak post-restoration. @gutwrencher pointed out that the wheel/fender gap needed attention despite finding the car good looking. Overall, these comments reflect unease regarding the vehicle's condition and past restoration quality.
|
 |
Positive: The comments express a general appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and performance. @Carbine123 highlights the appealing black-on-black design and believes it offers great value. @Mongoose55 also commends the seller for their effective presentation, noting the joy the car would bring on the road despite its likely low fuel efficiency. @clawson9 remarks on the vehicle's beauty, specifically praising the Black Sapphire color. Additionally, @amotorsports reassures potential buyers about the vehicle's condition, mentioning extensive recent servicing, an attractive exhaust sound, and the inclusion of a powertrain warranty to instill confidence in bidders.
Neutral: Some comments raise practical questions and seek clarification about the car's history and condition. @drbirdie humorously inquires about the vehicle's journey across time and any adaptations for future fuel sources. @CarCrazy24 requests an update on maintenance aspects like rod bearings and throttle actuators, which are common concerns for owners of performance vehicles. Additionally, @malibupearls questions compliance with emissions tests based on past records, reflecting a desire for transparency regarding the car's operational status.
Negative: Certain commenters express skepticism and concern regarding the vehicle's maintenance and repair history. @867S meticulously questions the seller about an outstanding $8,000 repair recommendation that appears unaddressed in the provided documentation, causing confusion about the car's state. @etip criticizes what they perceive as exaggerations about the seller's experience with M cars, while also mentioning costly repairs seen in similar models. Overall, there seems to be a demand for more thorough disclosure from the seller in response to concerns raised by potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The overall condition of the vehicle is praised by the seller, @SAImports, who highlights that it shows no mechanical or physical flaws, stating it is a "well-preserved example". The seller further reassures potential buyers about the vehicle's features, confirming the panoramic sunroof operates perfectly, the air conditioning blows cold, and that all lights and windows function as intended. Additionally, they mention that the vehicle's interior retains a new scent, indicating careful maintenance and a non-smoking history, which contributes positively to its appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about specific vehicle details, such as @Moe2635 who asks about potential odors and tire date codes, and @discodoggo who brings attention to past damage records and suggests potential misreporting on Carfax. The seller responds promptly to these questions, discussing undercarriage photos, the condition of various components, and emphasizing that they will clarify any discrepancies regarding damage reports. This exchange showcases a healthy level of dialogue and transparency between the seller and potential buyers, which helps build trust.
Negative: Concerns are raised by several commenters regarding past accident reports and the accuracy of the vehicle's damage history. Notably, @kw012 and @Moe2635 express apprehension about the lack of initial detailed undercarriage photos following reports of damage. Commenter @discodoggo mentions visible imperfections like a creased fender, prompting skepticism about the integrity of the vehicle's history and subsequent corrections with Carfax. The seller acknowledges these issues and references ongoing attempts to rectify the misinformation, but the initial uncertainty may affect buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @classicguy57 commented that the vehicle features a very interesting color that initially appeared black in most pictures but revealed a reddish hue in others, noting that he had not seen this color on another Mustang GT before. @GlaceBay (The Seller) assured potential buyers that the car is in like-new condition, having been driven sparingly with less than 25,000 kilometers (approximately 15,000 miles) on it and never having been in winter conditions. @GlaceBay also offered to cover the costs for a complete check-up at a Ford dealership prior to the sale, demonstrating confidence in the car's condition.
Neutral: @zymney asked about the shipping process to Toronto and related costs, indicating interest in the vehicle's logistics. @LW57 pointed out that the vehicle's window sticker states it is 'not intended for sale or registration in the US' and inquired about what adjustments would need to be made for it to meet U.S. specifications. @Doc1965 inquired about details regarding a feature seen in one of the vehicle's photos, showing that potential buyers were actively seeking clarification on specific aspects of the car.
Negative: @zymney questioned @GlaceBay about the reasons for selling the vehicle after only six months, hinting at concerns regarding undisclosed issues with the car. @Doc1965 raised concerns over a tire pressure monitoring system (TPMS) fault seen in the startup video, suggesting there might be issues that need attention. @silkysam947 echoed a sentiment that perceived the car primarily as black rather than the advertised color, indicating some confusion or misrepresentation in the vehicle's appearance.
|
 |
Positive: @Cruiser1500 (The Seller) emphasizes that the vehicle has been well-maintained and is in top-notch condition, stating it has not had any accidents or damage. They assure potential buyers that there are no leaks, and the car has been parked on a concrete driveway where no drips have shown up. They upload videos demonstrating the top of the vehicle functioning properly and add photos of the transmission fluid to reassure buyers about its state.
Neutral: @srroadhouse requests additional videos and photos to assess the vehicle more thoroughly, asking specifically for footage of the convertible top operating, close-ups of the oil pan, and images of the transmission fluid dipstick. @madcap954 points out cracks in the door panels and raises questions regarding the airbag deployment history, to which @Cruiser1500 responds with transparency about the vehicle's condition but notes the presence of cracks.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the check engine light being on, as noted by @Gootdeal, who asks for the corresponding code. @Cruiser1500 (The Seller) attempts to clarify that the light is a standard maintenance reminder and nothing indicates a mechanical issue. Nonetheless, potential buyers express hesitation with the door panel damage and the check engine light, indicating potential areas of concern that need addressing.
|
 |
Positive: @greene1111 commented that it is a lovely car and requested photographs of the steering wheel. @ButchR praised the color combo of the vehicle. @SimplexFish found the car nice and inquired about its repaint history, showing interest in its original color. @JAY-Z stated that silver is the definitive color for a 76 Eldorado convertible, complimenting its design. @white78 remarked on the quality of the Eldorado from Eldorado Hills, CA, indicating a positive impression. The seller, @29fordauction, shared that the car was originally silver and had a repaint in 2017 to match it, confirming its quality and detailing. Furthermore, after an oil change and installation of a new battery, the car is ready to drive, showcasing proper maintenance during the seller's 27 years of ownership.
Neutral: @DocMGL questioned whether the steering wheel was cracked, which led to a cover being placed over it, while also addressing concerns about the AC blowing but not being cold. @Eagle32 expressed curiosity about California smog testing requirements, pondering the implications if the car was exempt. @TheADM provided an overview of California's smog test categories, explaining the varying requirements based on location and vehicle age. @antonvt asked the seller if an aftermarket catalytic converter was installed and whether it was model-specific, demonstrating a practical inquiry about the vehicle's components. The seller clarified the car had not been smoked in and does not have an unpleasant odor, addressing potential buyer concerns.
Negative: @greene1111 raised concerns about body damage on the right side behind the front wheel and questioned the overall condition, specifically whether the car smells bad inside. @DocMGL pointed out issues with the steering wheel and AC, hinting at additional problems that might require fixing. @yardbird221 stated that he would need the car to be smog certified before bidding, indicating a potential obstacle in the buying process. @Eagle32's comments imply a cautionary stance regarding the seller's responsibilities for repairs under California law, revealing doubts about the vehicle's compliance with smog regulations.
|
 |
Positive: @Seven_Footer commented on the vehicle's appearance, specifically complimenting the sleek rims and identifying it as a good looking Cobra. @Z282SLO praised the 'Redfire' color, calling it great for these Terminators and noted the vehicle's unique interior as one of only 758 with graphite suede. @homie3186 expressed their affection for the car, saying it is sweet and also appreciated the wheel setup, wishing the seller good luck. @2hot2trot remarked on how clean the car is with very low miles, contributing to the excitement surrounding its appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed specifics about the vehicle's listing and included items. @Zarroc asked if the original wheels were included since the listing primarily showed different ones, to which @NVGT350 confirmed that they were indeed included but humorously noted the discrepancy about the tire brand. @WesDuenkel brought attention to the presence of the smoker's package, but pointed out that the cigarette lighter was missing. Additionally, @Knacejr requested a close-up photo of a dent noted on the left door, indicating a desire for more clarity about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @NVGT350 and @Zarroc shared a light-hearted exchange regarding the listing's inconsistencies, particularly about the original wheels and tire brands, suggesting a lack of attention to detail in the listing. @SayWhen pointed out that the car needs new offset steering rack bushings, highlighting a potential issue that requires immediate attention. Overall, there was a consensus that while the car is visually appealing, there are aspects of the listing and vehicle maintenance that might need to be addressed.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its impressive specification and aesthetics, with many users like @Mezgerturbo09 and @silverbulletgti noting its beautiful appearance and design. @motts911targa referred to it as absolutely stunning, praising its color combination and manual transmission. Others like @serve-n-folly and @allcityeli expressed admiration for its interior, stating it must have an amazing leather aroma, reinforcing that its design is a modern Porsche perfection. This admiration extends to various aspects including performance, comfort, and potential value as a collectible, with comments from @gb75 acknowledging it as a refined beast.
Neutral: Several users shared curiosity and practical inquiries regarding the vehicle, such as @mprickett's question about the leather type used, while @JoeKai sought specific details on the type of protective film applied. Some comments, like those from @Biodds and @Lanimal83, reflected speculative thoughts about why many Porsches have low mileage or changed hands multiple times, but did not pass judgment. The discussion also touched upon differences in seat options and comfort preferences, highlighting that opinions vary based on personal use scenarios, as noted by @spnikravan and @Mezgerturbo09.
Negative: On the negative side, some comments pointed out concerns regarding the resale value and market dynamics of high-priced vehicles. @Nly2k mentioned negativity surrounding the new GT3, implying that some individuals might be envious of others securing allocations. @crashedsnow and @R8M hinted at the implications of flipping vehicles for profit, stirring a slight controversy in perspectives about those who buy such exclusive cars. There were also doubts about the practicality of the carbon fiber seats versus traditional sofas, with @Mandinga expressing skepticism about performance comparisons with older models.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle are overwhelmingly positive, with users such as @Roadmaster and @DBG1973 expressing their admiration for its stunning beauty and classic design. @SmellDawg describes it as a vehicle that exudes class, while @Middler89 simply labels it as 'gorgeous.' Additionally, @1969HurstOlds calls it a 'lovely masterpiece' and pays homage to its design heritage, reflecting a shared appreciation among commentors for the aesthetics and craftsmanship of the Roadmaster.
Neutral: Commentors often discuss the vehicle's characteristics and history, with @fka_ray noting the significance of the straight 8 engine and its impressive horsepower for the era. @oldfordlover mentions the popular Dynaflow automatic transmission that many of these models featured. The discussions also touch on the cultural relevance of the car, as seen in @eskothomson's inquiry about its connection to the movie Rainman, to which @da242 (The Seller) confirms the association with a 1949 model.
Negative: There are few negative comments regarding the vehicle, with @mcj4250 expressing surprise at the competitive bidding on the car, suggesting a mixed sentiment about its auction value. However, overall, the sentiment remains mostly positive, and there are no overt criticisms or complaints about the vehicle's performance or condition noted in the comments.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed interest in the vehicle's supercharger setup, particularly noting that the supercharger is CARB approved, which is a significant positive for potential buyers concerned about emissions regulations in North Carolina. @Alamance1520 (The Seller) clarified that the supercharger would pass smog checks and also mentioned the provision of a 60-day temporary tag, enhancing the vehicle's appeal. Additionally, @T0rqu3 positively described the car as clean and beautiful, indicating strong interest among serious buyers who are eagerly anticipating the bidding process.
Neutral: A number of inquiries were made about the vehicle's modifications and condition. @suncoastmotors asked about modifications beyond the supercharger, highlighting the interest in understanding the performance levels available with the vehicle. Other commenters, such as @steve.turley and @Durangoman, inquired about features like blind spot assist and whether the car had been tuned or tested on a dyno. @KAMF also requested more information about the paintwork and closeup photos, emphasizing a need for transparency regarding the car's overall condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's maintenance history, particularly about the rod bearings. Commenters like @not2manycars highlighted the absence of information in the service records regarding whether the rod bearings had been serviced, which could be a red flag for potential buyers depending on the vehicle's age and mileage. @AlongMuskrat questioned the integrity of the vehicle's roof in rain, indicating worries about possible leaks. Overall, while interest is high, the lack of detailed maintenance records and some feature questions left room for caution among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described as a stunning 1991 Porsche 911 Carrera 4 Coupe in Grand Prix White, with several commenters expressing admiration. @GDogg praised the gorgeous C4 Coupe and its classic gray interior, while @Seaate20 highlighted the uniqueness of the white C4 964. @turbodan911 shared their nostalgic experience of riding in a similar car, adding to the positive sentiment surrounding the vehicle. @Anesicolaci found the 964 beautiful and curious if a car cover was included, further emphasizing its appealing aesthetics.
Neutral: Comments from @rk15000 and @Grgannaway touched on the wheels and the documentation associated with the car. @rk15000 inquired about the original wheels, while the seller confirmed that the current wheels were the only ones included in the sale. @Grgannaway asked for maintenance records, suggesting a desire for transparency regarding the car's history. Additional inquiries were made about California emissions regulations and potential tax implications when purchasing from out of state, with the seller providing assurance that they could assist with smog compliance and tax matters.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding oil leaks and rust. @PMB59 questioned the lack of a recent smog test prior to the sale, reflecting apprehension regarding the car's compliance with California regulations. @Bavaria911 inquired about rust around the windows and asked about oil leaks, to which the seller mentioned no visible rust but noted a slight oil seep. @Kiko81780 expressed disappointment over the car's odometer issue, indicating it could be a concern for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @mustangman7 expressed nostalgic sentiments about the car, recalling memories of their own 1978 model and wishing good luck for the seller, @testdummypilot. @kostasd praised the Town Car for being cool and complete while addressing queries about the roof color change, showing a good level of knowledge regarding the car's history. The seller shared extensive documentation and information about the vehicle, assuring buyers of the car's well-preserved condition, rich documentation, and transparency in the transaction process. @CaveatEmptor also noted that the car's original modifications were confirmed by paperwork, reinforcing its collector's value.
Neutral: The seller, @testdummypilot, addressed concerns about the car's vinyl roof and its color, explaining that the roof was originally dyed to match the body color before delivery. They provided details about the upkeep of the car, emphasizing its storage in climate-controlled conditions and that it had never been driven in foul weather. Commenters like @froomg and @ScottNThompson pointed out the enjoyable nature of driving such a classic vehicle while discussing its performance metrics, including torque ratings for winter driving conditions. @FleetwoodEldorado, @culp4cpa, and others asked specific questions about the car's inspection address and the potential costs of dyeing the top, indicating serious interest from potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding the vinyl roof, with @CaveatEmptor questioning the current color in relation to the original color noted in the documentation. @Craiger37 mentioned discrepancies in the padding of the vinyl roof potentially indicating it was not original, while @24kCaddyman called out concerns about possible smoke or steam coming from the engine in the startup video, questioning the mechanical condition. @Ford1973 shared skepticism regarding the roof's original condition, wanting assurance that it would be reverted back to its original specifications if they won the bid. Overall, there are some doubts among potential buyers about the authenticity of certain features and the vehicle's mechanical condition.
|
176-Kilometer 1995 Chevrolet K1500 Cheyenne Extended Cab 4×4
2GCEK19K1S1181434
Lot 224428
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciate the vehicle's low mileage, emphasizing that it essentially resembles a brand new 30-year-old truck. @Abeurocarguy mentions having seen the truck before during a program tour and praises its well-preserved condition. Additionally, @MS3DALE points out the rarity of such vehicles being sold while still being functionally usable, indicating a unique opportunity for potential buyers.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding specific features of the vehicle. @NextGen questions the bed size, to which @AutoTraitor and @KROD provide their insights based on the photos, concluding that it is a 6.5-foot bed. The seller, @bringsallyup, confirms the bed size and offers assistance with shipping logistics, thereby facilitating the sale process.
Negative: Some commenters express concern over potential previous damage and the nature of the truck's use in a training program. @Scadillac asks for details about the hail damage repairs, while @silver63 inquires whether the truck was disassembled for training purposes. @fouillard13 also notes a lack of options on the truck and questions its usage history, indicating skepticism about its condition.
|
 |
Positive: @tmshort remarked that someone took very good care of the truck, expressing hope that the seller has some history to share about it, noting it looks well loved. @sgmaybee praised the truck as very nice, showing interest in the repaint and interior's originality. @Mc25t190 (The Seller) shared that the Toyota was a "One Owner" vehicle, kept in good condition with the original color blue being preserved during repaint, and that everything was in working order, which instills confidence in potential buyers.
Neutral: @bringatrailer thanked @srx701 for pointing out a typo, indicating that corrections were made to the listing. @DominicC asked about specific features such as the bed length of the truck and how the visor was attached, to which @Mc25t190 (The Seller) provided detailed information, confirming it is a short bed and explaining the installation method of the visor.
Negative: @srf701 raised a concern about a typo and garbled wording in the listing. @TexAgg questioned the age of the tires, suggesting caution regarding their condition. @Meissen_540 inquired specifically about whether the air conditioning works properly, hinting at potential maintenance issues, which @Mc25t190 (The Seller) confirmed—even stating that the A/C is blowing cool, not cold, indicating it may need recharging.
|
 |
Positive: @AutoMaddox and @Verdigris both praised the vehicle, highlighting its excellent condition and the care it received from the owner. @AutoMaddox noted the car is "very nice," well cared for, and has no apparent fluid leaks, while also commenting on its functional and aesthetic qualities. @Verdigris shared their personal experience with a similar vehicle, expressing joy in owning and driving such cars.
Neutral: @Hej (The Seller) addressed inquiries regarding maintenance and repair. They explained that the car's valve cover gasket and header gasket were recommended for maintenance during service, though there were no leaks observed. The seller provided information on the IMS bearing replacement, stating that there was no documentation but the previous owner claimed it had been done. The seller also mentioned storage options for potential buyers who may need it.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Rkny regarding repair costs associated with the rear window tear, with inquiries about replacing the whole top if needed. @Drrob505 questioned the AC system's condition and if it would require any major repairs, to which @Hej responded that the AC functions well and requires no repairs. Additionally, @Dave_Denver expressed concern about the lack of paperwork on the IMS bearing replacement, prompting questions about the vehicle's history.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle for its aesthetic and performance features. @Todd_Z. expressed admiration for the color and stripes of the Bronco, stating that he likes the 86s the best from this generation. @Jbrown89 echoed this sentiment, exclaiming that the 86 with EFI is the best of the bullnoses and expressed his love for the vehicle. Meanwhile, @MontanaBroncos noted that Bullnose Broncos are on the rise and highlighted that this particular vehicle has the right look, further supporting its appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @socal_vc, provided detailed information about the vehicle's condition and history. They confirmed that the Bronco has spent its entire life in Southern California, specifically Poway, which has contributed to its lack of rust and need for repairs. The original paint color is Dark Shadow Blue Metallic, which was recently refinished, and the seller responded to various inquiries regarding the decals, videos, and the Bronco's history without indicating any problems. They also expressed their intention to share more photos and videos throughout the auction process.
Negative: While the comments were mainly positive, there were some inquiries that hinted at concerns. @Cstanley44 asked about the original color and any rust repair before the new paint, suggesting some scrutiny over the vehicle's past. Additionally, @Classics2 requested more driving videos, indicating that the content provided was not entirely sufficient, which could imply a slight dissatisfaction with the seller's media updates. Overall, though, there were no overt negative comments about the vehicle itself.
|
 |
Positive: The car has received praise for its features and maintenance. @esixty highlighted the impressive replacement of components like the Mickey Mouse flange with a metal version, indicating good care. @CarCrazy24 and @CAJoel appreciated the overall comfort, spaciousness, and aesthetic appeal of the vehicle, calling it one of the last great BMW designs. The seller, @anakinepeace, confirmed that the car includes Bluetooth connectivity and an aux port, enhancing its functionality for modern users. The sunroof and roof features have also been appreciated, with videos promised to showcase their operation.
Neutral: Several inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition and history have been made. @mlowengrub questioned why the seller is selling the car soon after significant maintenance investments. @young308 asked about recent suspension bushings services, while @thirdstrike inquired about the driver’s seat condition. @Pschoeny sought clarification on the vehicle's mileage history, which led to a detailed explanation from @anakinepeace about the mileage discrepancies at the time of purchase.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the clarity and accuracy of the vehicle's mileage and history. @dmiles996 pointed out inconsistencies with the mileage records, suggesting that the seller's claims about daily driving don't align with official documentation. This uncertainty has led to some potential buyers expressing doubts about the vehicle's reliability and the seller's transparency. Additionally, @esixty mentioned sealant being used incorrectly during a maintenance task, which raised further questions about the quality of prior repairs.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received enthusiastic comments, particularly its performance attributes, with @GDogg calling it 'spectacular' and @marshgator praising its design and power. The all-wheel-drive system with Drift Mode was highlighted as an appealing feature by @BigT77, who regards this car as a 'highway monster.' Moreover, @AMGbenzTexas (The Seller) reassured potential buyers about the vehicle's specifications and availability for viewing, prompting responses from interested buyers like @KOMPRE55OR who expressed eagerness to meet in person.
Neutral: While there was excitement about the vehicle, some comments were mixed regarding its history. @Yags raised concerns about the branded title and accident history, suggesting that the seller provide documentation. @AMGbenzTexas (The Seller) addressed these concerns by explaining that the branded title resulted from California's lemon law due to coil pack replacements and promised to provide service records. Additionally, there were discussions about the engine bay condition and missing center cap, with the seller actively engaging in resolving these issues by ordering the correct part and providing updated information.
Negative: Conditions of the car drew criticism, especially from @Yags, who pointed out the dirty engine bay and missing center cap, which detracted from the luxury image of the vehicle. Others like @VKAS and @JimBobaRoomba requested more detailed pictures of specific damage areas, as concerns were raised about paint condition and scratches. The seller, @AMGbenzTexas, worked diligently to clarify the vehicle's status but still faced scrutiny, particularly around the lack of clear documentation on the accident history and repair details.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments express enthusiasm for the vintage Jeep model, with @MissuDad describing old Jeeps with full patina as 'so cool'. @Blizzard340 called the 304 CJ-5 iconic and referenced its impressive 4WD capabilities. @Valkyrja shared fond memories of their experiences with a similar model, emphasizing its reliability and ease of repair, which echoes the heartfelt appreciation for Jeeps amongst enthusiasts. @Y2K911 mentioned the labor of love involved in restoring a 73 CJ5, further indicating that collectors will covet the vintage hardtop, showcasing a community that values these classic vehicles for their character.
Neutral: @Shellback81, the seller, provided informative responses to inquiries about the vehicle, mentioning that the Jeep is drivable but requires new tires, highlighting the practical aspects that potential buyers should be aware of. They acknowledged a mistake when flagging a comment and shared the vehicle’s history, including that they owned it for a substantial time after purchasing it from the original owner. The seller indicated that while they haven't utilized the Jeep much in recent years due to age, they remain optimistic about its future, depending on the buyer's interests.
Negative: Some comments hint at concerns about the vehicle's condition, as @HDWalt asked if it is drivable, which suggests uncertainty about its reliability. @Y2K911 also speculated about potential rust problems hidden under the added lower body panels, which implies caution about the Jeep's overall state. The seller, @Shellback81, candidly acknowledged the need for maintenance, including cleaning and service, which may lead potential buyers to weigh these factors against their readiness to invest in restoring the Jeep.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle and its potential. @morgannut highlighted the generosity of @bcliff55, who offered a free replacement hood, indicating a strong and supportive community among vintage car enthusiasts. @60robert shared a fondness for MG B's, recognizing their charm and unique features, and @dmt1230 (The Seller) emphasized the meticulous care and maintenance the car has received, noting over $17,000 in upgrades performed since 2018. This dedication suggests a solid foundation for the car, indicating that the new owner will enjoy a well-maintained vehicle.
Neutral: Commenters shared mixed feelings about specific aspects of the vehicle, particularly the hood situation. @kostasd referred to the hood's condition in the provided photos, while @IvorKZ remarked on the frustration of the damage, recognizing it as a significant issue. The discussion also touched upon the vehicle's history, with @dmt1230 (The Seller) mentioning previous work done but remaining uncertain about the extent of paintwork outside the hood area. Additionally, practical inquiries about traveling great distances in the car without the hood raised reasonable concerns about reliability.
Negative: Not all feedback was positive, as some users pointed out significant issues with the vehicle, primarily centered on the hood. @MOMMABYRD and @craZee expressed disappointment regarding the hood's absence, with @craZee calling the situation extreme. @19Willys46 cautioned that the damage to the hood might significantly impact the auction price. Moreover, there were critiques about the aesthetics and modifications of the car, with @60robert pointing out the odd placement of a luggage rack that obscured the MG badge, which he found silly. Overall, concerns about the car's present condition contrasted with its potential.
|
 |
Positive: @Greg1029's truck presents well for its mileage. @2e671 noted it is a comfortable truck, describing it as great for its specs and the top-of-the-line LT Autorides with rear air suspension. @lgracer95032 praised the clean interior and good engine performance, highlighting that the truck is well-maintained and runs smoothly, even at high speeds. Multiple commenters agree the truck's availability of parts and maintenance makes it a reliable choice. Overall, it seems many find the truck to be in good condition and a solid investment for daily driving.
Neutral: @Greg1029 mentioned that he is open to test drives after 5 PM, accommodating local interested buyers. He also stated he would assist with shipping and hold the car until after the holidays if needed, as long as payment is confirmed. Some discussions have taken place regarding minor fixes, such as the sunroof button and the need for a backup camera, indicating potential improvements rather than major issues with the vehicle. This reflects a balanced view of the truck, recognizing both its current state and possible upgrades.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised by @SuperKram regarding inconsistent leather surfaces, suggesting that while the seat cushions were redone, the upholstery on the driver's section could have been replaced as well for uniformity. @Honda4me mentioned dissatisfaction with the non-Bose sound system, although @Bob_Jackson disagreed, arguing the non-Bose system actually outperformed others. Additionally, @mike1484 inquired about the validity of the smog certificate, implying potential uncertainty for buyers regarding regulatory compliance and vehicle maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express their appreciation for the vehicle, citing its excellent condition and reliability. @SpeakerPhoneJones highlights the iconic nature of the 1996 SR5 4WD, emphasizing its legendary 3.4L engine and classic Toyota build quality. Others, like @SellySel and @Jayule, note the impressive service history and the truck's clean appearance, suggesting it will make a great long-term investment for the next owner. @Onewheelpeels shares enthusiasm about their similar vehicle, anticipating strong auction results, while @ANDERJ23 and @4runnerIGJ reinforce the positive sentiment by mentioning the low mileage and potential longevity of the truck.
Neutral: The seller, @HoangK22, provides reassurance about the vehicle's functionalities, confirming that all windows and roof work properly and that the service records are up to date. The seller addresses potential buyers' inquiries, explaining their hobby of refreshing unique vehicles before resale. Additionally, they clarify the vehicle's past history, mentioning that it had limited use due to the previous owners' age. Commenters like @kissme and @TXDesFox have specific queries about the truck's maintenance and past use, showing an active interest in the vehicle's condition while waiting for answers from the seller.
Negative: Some potential buyers express hesitations regarding the vehicle's recent sale and limited driving history. For instance, @kissme raises concerns about possible fluid leaks and the reasoning behind the minimal use of the vehicle after its purchase. Their cautious approach reflects a desire for transparency about the truck's past. Additionally, @Cleancutmover inquires about the heating system and the condition of the frame, hinting at potential underlying issues that could affect desirability. Overall, while most comments lean positive, a few express warranted skepticism about the vehicle's reliability based on its recent history.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its amazing condition and unique features. @4easter describes it as 'awesome', while @Ried finds it to be a 'handsome car!' and appreciates the feedback provided by other users about the car's details. Commenters like @vansters and @Dmhager praise the car's color combination and maintain high hopes that it will be displayed and driven rather than locked away. @BigT77 describes it as a 'nice time capsule from 1980' and appreciates the rarity of its low mileage. Overall, the car is regarded as a significant find, especially for collectors and enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several users ask clarifying questions about the car's maintenance history and specific details regarding its wear and features. @CutterNJ inquires about the power steering, while @Dhayes and @EOF question the circumstances surrounding the transmission rebuild given the low mileage. @lithag, the seller, responds to many of these queries, providing insights into the vehicle's transmission and overall history, noting that the mileage is indeed accurate and suggesting it has been well-preserved. There is a brief discussion about the age of the tires, with documentation regarding their replacement also mentioned by the seller.
Negative: Some commenters express skepticism about the vehicle's low mileage and overall condition, questioning whether the wear on the front seats is typical for an early 928. @X2586 notes discrepancies in the seat condition and the underside, implying concern over the car's provenance and asking others if this level of wear is normal. @prescue shares feelings of doubt regarding the authenticity of such a low mileage claim, and @Lilboy21 mentions hesitance in believing in very low mileage cars, citing common issues with odometer failure. Overall, there is a cautious undertone among some commenters, reflecting a degree of suspicion about the car's history as presented.
|
 |
Positive: Comments on the vehicle reflect a strong appreciation for its aesthetics and performance. @Loki3 described the truck as beautiful with cool upgrades, wishing the seller luck with the sale. @martino84 referred to it as a modern classic, praising its glorious exhaust and supercharger whine. Additionally, @adamo89 expressed admiration for the truck and noted that it is something he hopes to own one day, wishing the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: Several comments provide clarifications or questions regarding the vehicle's history and condition. @alwaysroomfor1more questioned the ownership history of the truck, while @AlexMac615 sought to understand the status of the title, leading the seller, @RDJ26171, to clarify that the title is from South Carolina and was replaced after losing the original. @svtguy08 even inquired about the possibility of an in-person viewing, illustrating a general interest in the vehicle among potential buyers.
Negative: There are a few concerns raised regarding the ownership history and title of the vehicle. @alwaysroomfor1more seemed skeptical about the ownership explanation provided by @RDJ26171, questioning if the Carfax report was incorrect. The confusion regarding the duplicate title also prompted questions from @AlexMac615, suggesting some potential buyers might be wary of the vehicle's documentation. Additionally, some comments, like those from @Molae65, indicate a desire for certain aesthetic changes, such as the removal of a bug guard, which could reflect concerns about the truck's visual appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle's appeal, with @AKP calling it a beauty and praising its unique color. @Longmire45 described it as a "sexy beast" and noted the car's striking visual presence, while @nexusautobrokers enthusiastically commented on everything about it. The seller, @spinny02, emphasized the vehicle's excellent condition, claiming it still has the "candy shine" from when it was first purchased. Commenters noted the incorporation of advanced tech features, such as night vision and supercruise, adding to its allure. The vehicle is still under warranty, which many found reassuring.
Neutral: Commenters have requested additional information on the vehicle's specifications and features, with @Plumber2 inquiring about the original sticker price and @OneHotRod asking for a copy of the full window sticker. The seller clarified details about the vehicle's pre-installed options, such as its paint protection and systems it comes equipped with. Questions surrounding the tire mismatch were raised by several users, including @minneymouse, who sought clarification about the tire brands on the vehicle. @Stronzo asked about the lien on the vehicle and how that would affect the title transfer, to which the seller provided a detailed response.
Negative: There were some criticisms regarding clarity in the listing, with @BigTasty3 making a humorous jab at the vehicle's design by comparing it to a barn. @BrokenAdam pointed out that several important photos were missing from the listing, prompting some frustration. @Nacoocheejohn expressed concerns about comprehensive paint meter readings, highlighting a desire for transparency in the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @Longmire45 raised concerns about the reliability of the 6.2L engine, while others speculated on a rumored lack of comprehensive documentation, which the seller sought to address. Overall, there were notable requests for clarity and assurances regarding the vehicle's features and condition.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received positive feedback regarding its clear communication between the seller and potential buyers. @jusroscla, the seller, provided detailed clarification on the location of the rear and front turn signals, indicating that the rear signal is located beneath the brake light with specific lighting mechanics for turning. Additionally, the bike comes with the manual, two ignition keys, and a luggage key, which adds value to the purchase for prospective buyers.
Neutral: There are neutral comments pertaining to the details of the bike's condition and included parts. @asgor inquired about the spare parts, including the rear fender and original muffler/exhaust, which provided an opportunity for @jusroscla to explain that the original exhaust was not included and that the rear fender was disposed of by the dealership where the bike was purchased. This clarifies any confusion regarding what parts will come with the vehicle and helps to set clear expectations for interested buyers.
Negative: Negatively, the response regarding spare parts revealed some limitations. @jusroscla had to inform @asgor that the bike does not include certain original components like the rear fender and muffler, which prospective buyers may find disappointing. The disposal of the fender by the dealership underlines a lack of complete documentation and may affect the perception of value for some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @dunlapimports, the seller, emphasizes that the car is in 'mint' condition and presents a great value, stating that it is way underpriced for a California vehicle. The seller responds to inquiries about features and confirms the vehicle's premium plus specifications, detailing its various high-end features like blind spot assist and panoramic roof. Moreover, the seller assures @Eministry that they can assist with shipping, indicating their willingness to facilitate the sale process.
Neutral: Multiple commenters express curiosity about specifics related to the vehicle and the auction process, such as @Eministry's inquiry about organizing shipping to Tennessee and @zingray's confusion regarding the exact model variant of the vehicle. Additionally, there are questions concerning California sales tax and how it applies to out-of-state buyers, with @bushwacker seeking clarification about tax implications.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism and frustration with the dealer's engagement. @vertdaferk notes the absence of responses from the dealer and the lack of maintenance records in the auction photos, prompting them to withdraw interest. Likewise, @bushwacker expresses uncertainty about sales tax responsibilities for out-of-state buyers, leading to further confusion. @GAK911 mentions a discrepancy with tax information which the seller disputes, highlighting a potential lack of clarity in communication.
|
Coyote-Powered Factory Five Racing Type 65 Coupe 5-Speed for the Austin Hatcher Foundation
F5R1000612DC
Lot 224363
Private Party
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle often celebrate its stunning design and purpose, highlighting its impact on the lives of children facing cancer. @Cars3D lauds it as a 'cool car for a great cause,' while @Stratos describes it as 'oozing artistry' with perfection in craftsmanship. @Jeremygold007 and @Carguy19 both mention the beauty of the car and its role in supporting an amazing organization, recognizing the blend of style and charitable efforts put forth by the Austin Hatcher Foundation.
Neutral: Many respondents express curiosity about specific details regarding the car, with @Chuckspiers inquiring about tax deductions related to its purchase. @MPal asks about window options and legality, while @RobTX seeks confirmation of the vehicle's street legality and seatbelt presence. @EternalFriday humorously wonders about fitting in the car, drawing attention to practicality amid appreciation of the vehicle's aesthetics.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns or questions about functional aspects of the car, such as its legality for street use and the lack of a driving video as noted by @RobTX. @Oldwood expresses a desire for more comfort features, like power windows, expressing a sentiment that diverges from the classic build's purpose. @F1Rocket inquires about turn signals, indicating a desire for clarity on safety features, showing that while the car garners much praise, it also invites practical criticism.
|
Supercharged 2018 Toyota Tacoma TRD Off-Road Double Cab 4×4 V6 6-Speed
5TFCZ5AN9JX143354
Lot 224368
Dealer
 |
Positive: @CRUSH expresses enthusiasm, referring to the vehicle as a "Taco with a blower and three pedals," indicating a fun and enjoyable experience driving it. @SupraFreak praises the truck's beauty and impressive build, suggesting it holds significant monetary value. @shanko also compliments the vehicle's build, indicating it has a sweet look, while other commenters acknowledge the high-quality components like the Goose Gear rear seat delete kit that adds functionality and storage.
Neutral: @marosas86 raises a technical question regarding whether TRD Off-Road packages include a locking rear differential instead of the limited-slip differential (LSD), which reflects a seeker of detailed specifications. @Triple-B-Ranch inquires about the smog certification for a Tacoma with a supercharger in California, showing a cautious interest in compliance. @Jparkdo asks multiple logistical questions about tax implications and the availability of driving videos, suggesting they are seriously considering a purchase but need more information before making a decision.
Negative: @shanko questions the purpose of some items in the pictures provided, hinting at a lack of clarity in the listing details. @Jparkdo continues to seek information regarding vehicle inspections, looking for reassurance but implying concern regarding any potential undisclosed issues. Some commenters mention concerns over the vehicle's history and documentation, which can create hesitation for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Scliffe appreciates the vehicle for its interesting qualities, suggesting it harkens back to the roots of BaT. @Electraglider notes the rarity of surviving panels, deeming it to have solid bones for any project. @David_C. describes it as a great 'blank canvas' for creative work, while @bluesman envisions a maroon paint with black fenders as a great project. @CKKurtz lists creative ways to utilize the vehicle, and @Nachocheeze60 sees it as a perfect billboard for his small business.
Neutral: @OutOfMyElement reminisces about past ownership of a similar model, highlighting both the enjoyment and current limitations to undertake repairs, noting the price is currently beyond his budget. @a410traveler emphasizes the need for a trailer, deep pockets, and patience when considering the purchase. @JAY-Z shares the idea of utilizing the vehicle as a billboard for business promotion.
Negative: @JDarby points out the significant rust issues on the panel, describing it as a welder's dream to overcome. @ClassicMotorcarGroup (The Seller) acknowledges the rust problem, specifying it mainly on the crowl area but indicating that patch repair panels are available. @schmock88 expresses their fondness for the truck while @davek1661 finds it cool but is uncertain about its worth.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 described the 280SE cabriolet as a beautiful car with a lovely classic color combination and gorgeous interior, praising its beautiful wood and overall design. @GDogg expressed delight in the car, wishing for pleasant experiences with it. TheSeller, @ponyup4acause, echoed these sentiments, thanking @Dollycat3 for their comments and affirming the car's wonderful qualities. @Luz_do_sol noted the vehicle's proper restoration and high-quality refinishing, highlighting details like the rebuilt matching engine and transmission, and the stunning interiors. @quattro4Snow also appreciated the general beauty of the car and commented on the work done, particularly enjoying the color combination.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @DoctorA and @bdunigan, raised questions about the engine and transmission to ensure clarity. @DoctorA inquired whether the engine was original and matching numbers, to which @ponyup4acause confirmed that it was indeed the original and had been fully rebuilt. @bdunigan also asked about the history of the engine and transmission, which the seller clarified had been rebuilt and not replaced with used parts. @jim_rosenthal noted aspects of the car's condition, such as the radio and woodwork, recognizing some modifications and offering personal insights on improvements but appreciated the overall quality.
Negative: While the overall feedback about the vehicle appears to be positive, a few commenters noted issues that could warrant attention. @quattro4Snow mentioned that the bumpers were misaligned and could benefit from adjustment, suggesting it was a simple fix. @jim_rosenthal criticized the presence of chrome wheel trims, stating they detracted from the vehicle's original aesthetic. Furthermore, @bodydunigan expressed concern over whether the engine was replaced or genuinely rebuilt and questioned the specifics of the transmission's work, which indicates some unease about the car's modification history.
|
 |
Positive: @ppayne3 praised the BMW GS bikes as reliable, comfortable, and versatile, highlighting that this particular bike is just broken in and can handle both short trips and long journeys without issue. @Gr8drive (The Seller) expressed affection for this bike, sharing that it has been a remarkable travel companion throughout their ownership, and mentioned a comprehensive service history from working at a local BMW dealership.
Neutral: @Gr8drive (The Seller) provided clarifications regarding the bike's specifications, confirming that the driveshaft will be replaced under recall at the next service and that the seat is a Sargent with both high and low settings. They also noted that the bike is equipped with factory low suspension and addressed questions about the Enduro mode features, explaining how it adjusts throttle response and suspension settings, without actually changing gear ratios.
Negative: @DocS1 mentioned concerns about the bike's first gear being too high for starting on hills, referring to a past experience with a different model that had an 'Enduro' first gear which made it easier. @TexMexBubba expressed the need for verification on the suspension type based on the VIN, indicating a potential issue with correct identification, while @DocS1 remarked on the unavailability of this feature in earlier models.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's desirable characteristics, such as the 'hyper sensitive gas pedal' and overall lively driving experience mentioned by @Craven. @nismo_native mentioned their appreciation for the car's color, recalling it as a favorite at ZCON in Tampa. The seller, @imspud, highlighted the car's impressive accolades, including a gold medallion contender status at ZCON 2024, indicating its excellent condition for a 22-year-old car, further enhancing its appeal to potential buyers. Additionally, @japanoverland shared nostalgic feelings, reminiscing about their own experience with a similar model, praising its rarity and fantastical nature.
Neutral: The seller, @imspud, proactively addressed potential buyer inquiries, detailing their limited availability for answering questions and taking additional photos during the auction due to their commitments as an airline pilot. Several comments referenced the car's history and condition, including the correction of a mileage discrepancy by Carfax, which was acknowledged by both the seller and a comment from @bringatrailer. The seller consistently provided updates regarding the vehicle's features, such as the updated audio system and the functionality of the aftermarket radio, clarifying how it differs from the factory radio.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by buyers, notably inquiries about oil consumption and tire wear from @jim9bob, expressing a need for transparency regarding the vehicle's maintenance and history. Additionally, @Powermoves asked for more detailed explanation of the radio systems' functions, suggesting the information provided in the interior video was insufficient to address potential buyer concerns. Furthermore, other users highlighted the seller's lack of immediate access to the vehicle during the auction period, which could impact timely communications and responses to buyer queries.
|
|
|