Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the 930 Turbo Coupe as a stunning specimen, highlighting its unique color combination of Guards Red over Champagne Special. @Crashout and @elimiz compliment the quality of the seller's photographs and showcase their enthusiasm for the car. @80sDude agrees, noting that even poor-quality images wouldn't diminish its value, asserting that it's an absolute gem for any collection. @pumpe shares their own positive experience with the 930 by mentioning how they enjoyed a similar model for over 20,000 miles, emphasizing the fun and rewarding driving experience. Furthermore, @TSR90210 and @genrl express admiration for the car's design and collector appeal, reinforcing its status as a true icon.
Neutral: A few commenters, like @Blinker1462 and @jeff_nj, raise inquiries regarding the 4-speed gearbox, comparing it to the G50 and 915 transmissions, with @nine17K providing insights about the 930's robust gearbox capability. @EJM explains the oil pressure gauge on the dashboard, while @Mpollaci asks about the number of previous owners, a point addressed by the seller who confirms there have been four. Technical details and specifications seem to generate healthy discussions among enthusiasts regarding the car's features, with @Mpollaci and others discussing the radio installed, which led to a conversation about factory options.
Negative: Though the overall sentiment is positive, there are minor concerns mentioned, such as @Mpollaci's note about a potential clutch replacement due to the wear despite low mileage, highlighting a common issue with aging components. Additionally, @Rapallo mentions that clutches may glaze up over time when cars are left unused, suggesting realistic concerns regarding the engine's maintenance. These comments do not detract from the overall appreciation of the car but indicate that potential buyers should be aware of these technical nuances and the importance of careful inspection before bidding.
 |
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its exceptional features and condition. @S4vantb5 noted that it is a perfect trim example, while @DriveBye described it as absolutely stunning and a blast to drive. The comments highlighted aspects of the car such as the unique color, full paint protection film (PPF), and the appealing interior design with special seat inserts, contributing to its overall appeal among car enthusiasts. @mad_max99 emphasized the special feel of the 991.2 Tourings, aligning with the positive sentiment shared by others.
Neutral: Several comments reflected a neutral stance regarding the vehicle's market situation and ownership history. @maranello1983 raised questions about the frequent ownership changes, stating that the car had exchanged hands three times in just four months. Others echoed similar sentiments, expressing confusion about the vehicle's circulation among dealers. @116610LV acknowledged the car's history but pointed out that the market dynamics seem to be heavily influenced by dealer transactions rather than direct retail sales, indicating a broader discussion on market trends.
Negative: However, some commenters expressed skepticism and concerns about the vehicle's history and current market practices. @pushthebutton articulated that the car's frequent changes in ownership might suggest difficulty in selling it, hinting at a pattern of dealer 'shuffling.' @Rhil2527 concurred, suggesting that such practices could leave buyers burdened with inflated prices after several dealers markup the cost. The overall tone from these comments pointed towards caution for potential buyers, emphasizing the need for due diligence before making a purchase.
|
 |
Positive: There are several positive comments regarding the vehicle's condition and performance. @berlinas2k2 (The Seller) mentions that the car has perfect compression and has been graded 4.9 out of 5.0, assuring potential buyers of its reliability. @Eagle62, describes it as an excellent example and build, while @kevinduma highlights the car's overall great condition after extensive servicing, paint correction, and the application of front PPF. Enthusiasts are also excited about the Comptech supercharger, with @boostwagon sharing a positive experience about a similar setup improving the vehicle's low-end torque and overall driving pleasure.
Neutral: Some comments are neutral, focusing on inquiries about specifications and features rather than expressing strong opinions. @yan66 asks about the soft top's condition, and @Gdsnhanson inquires about the horsepower numbers, showing a keen interest but not necessarily making definitive statements about the car's attributes. @impulsepurchase shares their dyno experience with a similar supercharger kit and estimates comparable performance for this vehicle, indicating a thoughtful consideration of the car's potential without a clear sentiment. @NSXphil and @kevinduma discuss the supercharger's installation, showing interest in its documentation and history.
Negative: Negative comments express concerns about the seller's practices and the condition of the vehicle. @oilbrnr89 and @schnobel criticize the addition of a doc fee and the transparency of the sale process. @Maxie1959 raises questions about whether the clutch is original or has been upgraded, suggesting potential uncertainty about the vehicle's upgrades. @sdallasesq points out that the market has supporting evidence for a higher valuation for supercharged S2000s, while also noting the availability of lower mileage models for less, indicating some skepticism about the car's value in comparison to similar offerings.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments celebrate the DeTomaso Mangusta's striking beauty and significance in automotive history. @Dollycat3 expresses nostalgia for the car, recalling its debut as 'absolutely fabulous.' Commenters like @CCahan366 and @VioletPearl echo these sentiments, praising the car's impressive design and elegance. @Rickn highlights its rarity compared to other classic cars, while @Hulk2000 shares admiration for its character and aesthetics, stating it inspires even non-car enthusiasts. The consensus is that the Mangusta is not just a vehicle, but a work of art that demands appreciation in every angle.
Neutral: Some comments reflect on personal experiences with the Mangusta, with @MMAHARV reminiscing about a family member's ownership and the memories tied to it, while @puebla shares a historical account of seeing the car in Mexico. @Olibor1 (The Seller) describes the vehicle's current state, revealing details about previous ownership and restoration efforts. Others talk about the car's unique features and potential modifications that could enhance its drivability, illustrating a balanced viewpoint that appreciates the car's history while recognizing the need for some updates.
Negative: However, not all feedback is glowing; several users express concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and practicality. @rmessner questions why a large GT car would be driven in a field, hinting at possible neglect, while another user, @cardude76, suggests it may take substantial investment to restore the car adequately. There are also worries about the Mangusta’s handling and ride quality, as pointed out by @ron308, who recalls discomfort when driving a Mangusta and mentions necessary modifications. The mixed sentiments reflect a deep appreciation for the Mangusta's aesthetic appeal, yet also acknowledge the challenges of maintaining or restoring such a classic.
|
 |
Positive: @johnsonremarketing (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a "sweet car" that has been very well taken care of, highlighting that it drives well and looks awesome, describing the Corsa exhaust sound as incredible. @JackVetter shares a positive review from personal experience, calling the car a "performance bargain" and praising its driving experience and build quality. Several commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle's exterior color and performance features, indicating a strong general appreciation for the Corvette C8 convertible.
Neutral: Commenters have asked for additional information regarding potential issues with the car, such as paint chips and the condition of the windshield, with @mairagiraldo and @michael.david requesting documentation on transmission servicing to ensure warranty compliance. @mairagiraldo appreciates @johnsonremarketing's responses but remains cautious about the car's maintenance history, reflecting a desire for transparency before proceeding with their bid. The seller is responsive, providing clarification on warranty periods and the nature of the exhaust system.
Negative: Concerns have been raised by @mairagiraldo and @michael.david about the CarFax report showing multiple entries that could imply the vehicle had more than one owner and the lack of documented transmission servicing which may void the warranty. @mairagiraldo specifically highlights a potential issue with warranty validity due to the timing of the last transmission service, indicating mistrust in the seller's claims about the car's service history. Overall, there is a tension between the seller's assurances and the concerns voiced by commenters regarding the vehicle's condition and its service documentation.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the Audi R8, highlighting its stunning aesthetics and the rarity of the model. @RumbleAuto called it a "stunning example," while @CoopCity praised the successful refresh of the vehicle that maintained the original's appeal. @BigT77 noted the great options available on the car and reflected on the strong early bidding trend, signaling a positive reception during the auction. Owners like @SOLAR8 shared personal positive experiences, emphasizing the reliability of the V10 platform and the potential for performance enhancements without major issues. @jeremyr4 also endorsed the car, noting its unique status as being "1 of 1" for the 2023 model year, which adds to its desirability.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed the car's specifications and features, expressing curiosity and sharing knowledge about the R8 model. @BigT77 raised a query about the prevalence of black-on-black color schemes, suggesting that buyers might opt for more colorful options, while @Tigers196884 defended the popularity of such combinations. @SOLAR8 provided a comprehensive overview of maintenance tips and common issues to look out for on the Gen2 platform, indicating a sense of community among R8 owners who share insights to help each other. Furthermore, @careytx1 revealed practical details about the car's maintenance history, indicating professionalism in the auction process, although mentioning there was no PPF on the car.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the condition of the R8, particularly regarding potential cosmetic issues. @TheFonzerelli questioned the seat condition based on pictures from the auction listing, pointing out a possible stain and inquiring about small rock chips on the paint. Additionally, there were reminders from commenters about common issues that may arise with performance modifications, including valve issues mentioned by @jeremyr4. The discussion highlighted some anxiety about the maintenance and care of the high-performance vehicle, reflecting the cautious perspective of potential buyers regarding the car's history and current condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed their excitement and positive feelings about the vehicle. @MerryChristmas from @Arts992 brought festive cheer to the discussion, while @Osuwari praised it as a wonderful car and inquired about the OEM catalytic converters. Enthusiastic remarks included @Caymanorcarrera's compliment about the car and wishes for a Happy New Car Year. @gilberjj called it a cool car, showcasing interest in the seats and general performance, indicating a high level of engagement from the community around this vehicle.
Neutral: Many questions and neutral comments centered on specific details and configurations of the vehicle. @Cowtown_Jeff asked about the impact of race seats on leg room, while @Dyorkdrives (The Seller) clarified the registration issues in California and the need for modifications regarding emissions compliance. Additional inquiries from @notanothermiata and @manymiles sought more technical details about the vehicle, such as the potential for after-market modifications and whether it could be used effectively in certain racing classes, indicating a curious interest in its performance aspects.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concern regarding specific aspects of the car's condition and documentation. @rcrowder raised important issues about the car's registration limitations in California. Furthermore, @epaster pointed out potential deficiencies in the seller's disclosed information about engine modifications and lack of service documentation, leading to skepticism about the vehicle's reliability and performance. Similarly, concerns about the existing lien on the car were voiced by @Sorensen8, highlighting a sense of unease regarding the purchase process and the seller's integrity.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the extensive care and maintenance that the seller, @darkstar81435, has put into the 2004 Range Rover, reflecting a labor of love. Commenters express admiration for the vehicle's unique character, with @madmax noting its stunning presence and capability, alongside @mlowengrub praising the significant investment in repairs and maintenance to keep it roadworthy. The quality of the interior, such as the ivory Oxford leather and the artistic details in stitching, is also commended by several users, showcasing an appreciation for the vehicle's craftsmanship and overall aesthetic.
Neutral: Several users engaged in discussions about the specifics of the vehicle's restoration, including @brb and @Cjcall0809 requesting further details about the car's condition and features. The seller has been transparent in answering questions regarding maintenance records and repairs, including updates on interior and exterior restorations, such as the replacement of the headliner and the professional repaint of various parts. The history of ownership, including mention of the car having five previous owners, also sparked discussions around the reasons for its turnover, primarily concerning the previous transmission issues.
Negative: A few users voiced concerns about the reliability and maintenance of the brand, with @bdph52z recalling typical issues with the model, such as headliner wear, and expressing a reluctance to own another Range Rover despite acknowledging the vehicle's beauty. @John2277 and others pointed out concerns regarding the reputation of Land Rover mechanics, suggesting that those unfamiliar with the brand might face substantial bills for repairs. The conversation also touched upon the potential drawbacks of ownership, primarily the financial burden of maintaining such vehicles, emphasizing that without a suitable mechanic or the means to perform consistent maintenance, the experience might turn sour.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as a great build, while @someZguy finds it to be an incredible build, noting the impressive S500 chassis and the fun driving experience it likely offers. @Rackemwilly shares excitement over the features, mentioning heated and cooled seats as highlights. @KBoz appreciates the concept and expresses interest in seeing a cold start, and @RussR sees potential for the new owner to enhance the vehicle further. @RBBarkley praises the tremendous amount of fabrication work done, sharing admiration for the creativity involved in the project.
Neutral: @Acorn19 expresses mixed feelings, noting the uniqueness while being unsure about the fender flares. @Edmonds voices the need for more thorough video content, and @Bauback contemplates the challenge of ensuring the components fit together, acknowledging the extensive work necessary to achieve the build. There are discussions about title issues and the car's tech integration, with @dspotts asking about the drivability and potential need for adjustments, which @cooper_baumann (The Seller) responds to positively but acknowledges some minor issues.
Negative: @Edmonds compares the vehicle's look to an overweight individual struggling with clothing fit, suggesting it's quite mismatched. @rgpiatt raises concerns about door alignment, indicating a visible flaw in the build's aesthetics. @keith_k questions the tire clearance, suggesting that it may hinder performance, while @Myoldcut refers to an overall dissatisfaction despite finding some redeeming qualities, hinting at the vehicle's modification challenges. @UpaCurb and @EarlyV8 express doubts about the build quality and suggest the need for extensive refinements.
|
 |
Positive: @topduarte appreciates the vehicle's factory setup without decals and praises its color. @881le remarks on the nice configuration with the G92 N10 setup, expressing surprise at the absence of a JG1 aluminum driveshaft despite it being a loaded model. @Manywheels59 notes it's a really nice IROC, and @johnjm admires the sharp appearance of the Dark Red Metallic finish on the car.
Neutral: @tidmack raises a valid point about the lack of useful information in BAT listings, suggesting it could enhance the auction's transparency. @modhouse asks for clarification regarding the passenger side paint issues seen in the photos and requests additional visuals for the headliner and a running video. Multiple commenters, including @TransamGTA and @stoutblock, discuss the historical context and specifications of the aluminum driveshaft, shedding light on some of the vehicle's options and configurations.
Negative: Concerns regarding the seller's responsiveness have been expressed, with @coreyw66 noting their unsuccessful attempts to contact the seller, and @TTom48 suggesting that the seller may be unresponsive. @Boss2056 questions the paint job quality, likening it to a low-end service, and others express skepticism about the seller's transparency, particularly regarding paint damage and potential repair history, leading some buyers to feel uncertain about placing bids.
|
 |
Positive: @Atef96960 (The Seller) mentioned that the vehicle has all original paint, suggesting that the vehicle has been well maintained with no major repairs or repainting. The car is also being sold with two keys, which is typically seen as a positive attribute for potential buyers. Furthermore, the seller responded promptly to inquiries about the power tailgate functioning correctly, confirming that it operates as it should, which can enhance buyer confidence.
Neutral: Several potential buyers expressed requests for additional details regarding the vehicle, such as @ArmyPAC's inquiry about emissions failures and @foxinn's questions about key fobs and undercarriage photos. These requests indicate that interested parties are thorough and want to evaluate the car’s condition comprehensively before making a purchasing decision. The seller acknowledged these inquiries and promised to provide further details and media such as videos, which suggests open communication.
Negative: @37demi and @Ssalley pointed out concerns about a reported accident, indicating a hesitation among bidders regarding the vehicle's history. @foxinn and @pepaglobal aimed to gather more information about maintenance records and the power tailgate, highlighting that potential buyers are concerned about the vehicle's past and overall reliability. Overall, the comments reflect a cautious approach from bidders who want to clarify these issues before committing.
|
 |
Positive: @Abuelo mentioned that the gray color suits the car well despite it not being their favorite. @Oregondave noted the rarity and appeal of the wheels, calling the vehicle well optioned and in great condition. @Finished describes it as a beautiful vehicle, while @Bidz86 expressed admiration for it being an absolute beauty and highlighted its potential, despite its previous IMS failure. @Cowkick shared a positive story about their own experience with a similar vehicle, emphasizing the fun driving experience.
Neutral: @cherylbigman (The Seller) clarified that the odometer has never been replaced or rolled back, addressing @OBS_guy's concern. They also provided context about the IMS bearing replacement and the car's history, ensuring transparency. Additionally, they mentioned maintenance details from their service provider, indicating good condition for the brakes and tires, and discussing the history of the vehicle and improvements following the IMS failure.
Negative: @Jmr44281 invoked confusion with a simple comment about the progression of events being swift. @OBS_guy raised a concern regarding the service records, questioning the discrepancy in mileage, while @Dranrab75 pointed out numerous paint scratches on the car, challenging its condition for the mileage stated. @guanin60seconds expressed worries about possible previous issues and the car's idling status over 1.5 years, leading to doubts about its overall reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its impressive build quality and aesthetic appeal. @PulseCheck noted it as the 'perfect restomod.' @Amboy expressed a desire to own the car after hearing the motor. Commenters like @Doctodd and @Vintage1958 also found it to be a beautifully executed restoration, emphasizing the quality of its construction. The engine specifications got positive nods as well, with @ethanmark confirming it features a powerful LT5 crate motor. Overall, the car appeared to resonate well with many enthusiasts who appreciated its design and performance potential.
Neutral: Several commenters requested additional information and clarity regarding the vehicle's condition and specifications. @CoastMotorGroup and @DaPheonix773 emphasized the importance of including videos and better-quality photographs to showcase the build, indicating that initial pictures seemed inadequate. Responses from @ethanmark, the seller, included promises to upload more details and address concerns about the assembly process, panel gaps, and any discrepancies in the car's presentation. Many commenters noted the need for personal inspections, which suggests a mix of trust and skepticism surrounding the auction process.
Negative: Conversely, numerous critiques emerged regarding the car's assembly and presentation. @Pacheco167 questioned the tastefulness of the 'LT' badge, while others like @BMUSCAT pointed out specific alignment issues and potential paint flaws. Concerns were raised by commenters such as @CoastMotorGroup and @pghpainter about the fit and finish, suggesting that the restoration may have overlooked crucial details. Additionally, there were comments on the seller's lack of responsiveness and apparent absence during the auction, which fostered skepticism about the auction's integrity and raised doubts about the car's condition—and whether it justifies the asking price.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive sound and riding experience. @fstntq humorously likens it to a two-wheeled Santa sleigh, while @BloodyHell appreciates its pleasant sound and ride quality, making it enjoyable even at moderate speeds. @Silvaire notes the bike's charisma and practicality for long trips, emphasizing its Italian engineering. Many believe the bike to be suitable for both sport and touring needs, with @ih574 mentioning its thoughtful features and @BFY_TACO echoing the enjoyment of rides over long distances, illustrating its comfort and performance.
Neutral: Several commenters are seeking clarification on the bike's maintenance history and specifications. @njndale asks about the timing belt replacements, while @Floridaman61 shares information about accessible Ducati specialty tools for maintenance. @Vincent998 and @Johnmccoyitaly both bring up the servicing aspects and mention that obtaining a shop manual can assist future owners in understanding the bike's care. @victory-motorsports (The Seller) addresses questions about the bike's condition and maintenance details, assuring the commenters about its well-maintained status.
Negative: A few concerns have been raised regarding the bike's maintenance history and specific components. @AprilBob questions whether the rear motor mounts were upgraded, indicating potential issues for mechanical users, and there seems to be some ambiguity regarding the inclusion of the top case rack as pointed out by @ih574. @Flyboy2024 seeks confirmation about the recent Desmo service, hinting at apprehension about whether maintenance was adequately performed. @victory-motorsports (The Seller) attempts to address these queries, yet evaluations about past experiences with bikes like the ST4 reveal some regret and dissatisfaction among previous owners.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle reflect a strong appreciation for its style and condition. @Bjrich01 mentioned that this is a great way to start the Christmas celebrations, while @AugustneverEnds commented on its sharp appearance, expressing motivation to get their own vehicle back into driving condition. Many users, including @Vintage1956 and @Calamari_Jujutsu, extended good luck wishes to the seller, indicating that the car stands out as a desirable collectible. Furthermore, @onlyhonda4me emphasized the DeLorean's long history and good find, further echoing the overall excitement and admiration for the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about the car's physical condition and performance. @dmc_lover asked if visitors could see the car in person, signifying a typical interest from potential buyers. @jjb182 raised questions regarding its driving capabilities, suggesting that the 'Bring a Trailer' platform might indicate some level of unreliability, while @TheAnswerIs42 sought clarity on a wired accessory seen in the vehicle. The seller, @BoldlyBalding, actively responded to these inquiries, providing insights into the vehicle’s maintenance history and current condition, which was well-received by the community.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive comments, there were some concerns raised regarding the vehicle's thermal management. @Autolockerie noted potential overheating of the temperature gauge, leading to a response from @BoldlyBalding asserting that while the gauge operates, the car could benefit from a coolant system flush. @Bongiovi and @Vehicross99 highlighted issues regarding the car's cooling at idle, suggesting the need for maintenance attention. Additionally, @DMC12 questioned the replacement of a quarter panel, implying possible accident history, which could deter some buyers. Overall, while the vehicle is loved by many, there are specific concerns that potential buyers may need to consider.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters like @BlondLover and @Tom_S compliment the design of the vehicle, particularly appreciating the original Quadrifolio wheels and the hardtop styling, with @Tom_S noting it adds an attractive, coupe-like aspect to the Spider. @AlfistiNYC acknowledges the car’s positive features, suggesting that with careful maintenance and minor repairs, it can be in excellent condition, highlighting that the original parts add notable value. @Roadie6 (The Seller) shares emotional connections to the car, expressing gratitude for the memories shared with his father, emphasizing the effort and love put into maintaining the vehicle, and acknowledging the community's supportive insights about its condition and care.
Neutral: @Roadie6 (The Seller) provides several clarifications regarding the vehicle's current condition and maintenance history. He asserts that the driveline is intact, referencing recent photos to assure potential buyers the car is operational. Others, such as @Watry and @AlfistiNYC, discuss potential issues, mainly focusing on the guibo's condition and the necessity for regular maintenance, with some members seeking more information about the car's history and specifics about repairs done in the past, leading to a constructive exchange about its mechanical needs without definitive conclusions.
Negative: Skepticism arises around the condition of the car, especially following @Watry's comment about the broken guibo potentially rendering it undriveable, with repeated mentions of the necessity for repairs that may be overlooked by @Roadie6 (The Seller). Users like @ar1950 and @MHN4451 highlight discrepancies in the seller's statements and photos, indicating signs of damage that raise questions about the vehicle's upkeep. Concerns about the engine's long-term reliability and the absence of paperwork detailing significant repairs or overhauls at this mileage, as raised by @alfadoc, amplify doubts among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the FJ Cruiser, highlighting its excellent build quality and off-road capabilities. @80SeriesCruisers referred to it as a 'beautiful beast' and wished the seller good luck with the sale, while @jackalous311 and @speedLoungeRich praised the vehicle's impressive features and acknowledged its owner as a 'legend' in the FJ community. @Antoniofal remarked that the FJ is a well-thought-out rig, and @Umdorado emphasized the owner's effort and time invested in the build, even expressing regret for selling their own FJ.
Neutral: The seller, @DAPURAK, provided detailed answers to questions regarding the modifications made to the FJ, including information on its drivetrain and suspension setup. These responses reassured potential buyers about the vehicle's reliability and functionality for both street and trail use. Many commenters engaged in discussions about modifications, gearing philosophy, and the FJ's performance while off-roading, with @MikeNoLomotel showing interest in further exploring the vehicle's history and features before making a purchasing decision.
Negative: Despite overall positivity, some concerns were noted. @jibbles raised questions about the 8" rear differential's reliability when paired with large tires for off-road use, sharing a cautionary tale based on personal experience. @MikeNoLomotel inquired about the vehicle's fluid leaks, emphasizing a dislike for chasing leaks and hoping to ensure that the vehicle's condition aligns with their standards. These comments reflected a cautious approach from potential buyers who seek assurance regarding the vehicle's durability and maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: @Boris88SPG expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's leather luggage compartment cover, highlighting it as a rare option. @RecoveringAtty shared his affection for the Panamera Turbo, noting its beauty and the impressive options list that enhances the driving experience. @GulfStreamMotorCars (The Seller) provided a detailed overview of the car's condition, emphasizing its excellent care and maintenance, having been fully serviced by Porsche since new and always garaged, which adds to its appeal for potential buyers.
Neutral: @GulfStreamMotorCars mentioned that they will be adding more information and photos to the listing soon while thanking participants in the auction. They confirmed various inquiries regarding the vehicle, such as its all-wheel drive capability for Turbo models and provided reassurance about the vehicle's original paint and service history. They addressed questions about tire ratings and brake conditions, showing that they are responsive to bidder queries and keen to provide adequate information.
Negative: @whitedon1 raised concerns about the maintenance records of the brakes and asked for detailed measurements, indicating a lack of transparency on specific maintenance aspects. @Hyybriid pointed out a factual error regarding the all-wheel-drive classification of Panamera models, suggesting that not all are AWD. @rocketman63 noted that while normal wear is expected on a 15-year-old vehicle, bidders should be aware of potential additional costs for items needing replacement, such as tires, which reflects some skepticism towards the vehicle's upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: @Gmmuscleusa commented on the vehicle's appeal, expressing appreciation for its color combination and the presence of a proper rear tire, indicating a positive impression of the car's overall aesthetics and performance features. Streetworkswi (The Seller) mentions that the original rear tires are included with the sale, which could be appealing for potential buyers who want authenticity or restoration options.
Neutral: @parshooter inquired about time slips, suggesting that the vehicle's performance might be a point of interest for buyers. @ZeusBearThor asked about the number of quarter-mile passes and the vehicle's intended use, alongside a request for the original window sticker. Streetworkswi (The Seller) clarified that the vehicle has never been on the track and provided details about the original tires, suggesting a desire for transparency in the vehicle's history and condition.
Negative: @Berserker619 expressed concern regarding shipping options, noting that BaT cannot handle shipments and that the current tires are not suitable for freeway driving. This criticism indicates potential logistical issues for prospective buyers and highlights a key drawback in the car's usability under certain conditions.
|
 |
Positive: @Onlythetruthsorry1223 commented positively about the truck, appreciating its pre-smog status and expressing optimism for a successful auction. Similarly, @saltmann praised the truck's connection to a story and reflected on the nostalgia it invokes, indicating it holds special significance. @Starkey also noted the seller's transparent and humble approach, which they believe will greatly benefit him in life. @tlcamg complimented the seller on presenting the truck well, acknowledging it as a classic that many older enthusiasts can relate to and enjoy.
Neutral: Inquiries were made about the truck's condition and specifications from various users. For example, @LAT257 questioned the presence of corrosion on the hood despite a recent repaint, while @BMUSCAT asked if the truck had a steel or wood bed, to which the seller confirmed it was an all-steel bed rhino-lined after painting. Additionally, @Gmmuscleusa noted the appeal of the truck's grill style and interest in its mechanical features, while @Speedymays (The Seller) provided clarity on the truck's history and maintenance, demonstrating a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns or doubted the condition of the vehicle. @LAT257's inquiry about the corrosion stirred skepticism regarding the quality of the repainting. @adamc69 and @dennis949 both implied a level of scrutiny by drawing attention to available comments that had been flagged as non-constructive, suggesting there was backlash against the seller's narrative. @testcomment also pointed out the absence of a CarFax for the truck, potentially indicating a transparency issue which may affect buyer trust. Overall, the atmosphere contains mixed feelings; while there is enthusiasm, there are also significant reservations from some commenters.
|
 |
Positive: @LongiMotorsports showcases the GL450 as an amazing vehicle, encouraging potential buyers to view the photos and videos for detailed insights. The seller expresses a willingness to help with shipping and invites inquiries about any additional pictures or angles required. The maintenance history is thorough, highlighting various services such as oil changes and repairs across different mileage milestones, suggesting a well-cared-for vehicle.
Neutral: @CTT inquires about the receipts for the repairs mentioned at 98/99k miles, acknowledging that the work was done at San Carlos German Motor Works, which clarifies some confusion regarding who performed those service items. @LongiMotorsports responds positively, indicating an openness to further questions and the upcoming provision of videos and paint readings to enhance transparency.
Negative: @Jayrab raises a concern regarding the vehicle's ride height, questioning whether there are issues maintaining it when stationary. @LongiMotorsports addresses this by explaining that the apparent low ride height in the photos is due to the position of where the pictures were taken, confirming that there have been no issues and that the truck remains stable after being parked for several days.
|
 |
Positive: @Mr._H describes the Jaguar E-type as 'the greatest crumpet-catcher known to man', highlighting its charm and appeal. He humorously envisions a scene with a redhead in overalls and a sheepdog as part of the truck's allure. @jturner praises the truck for being well-kept and compares it to a jewel, emphasizing its rarity and desirable condition. @Kaymatt expresses satisfaction in not pursuing a different truck, implying that the current one is far superior, while @Adude appreciates the mostly original state of the truck, underscoring its quality.
Neutral: @Vitaminc914 (The Seller) responds to @k51020ranch's observation about the original paint and mentions that the truck has been cared for despite the bypass heater hose issue, which is an easy fix. He acknowledges @rkkmich's note about the truck being a true farm truck and provides a turn signal kit for the new owner. @Jimeze inquires about the VIN number stamped on the frame, to which @Vitaminc914 confirms a match and shares additional numbers he found, showing his attentiveness to detail. @jimr1 asks about oil leaks, prompting a response about the engine's condition, indicating a low oil leak that could be easily managed.
Negative: @K51020Ranch points out a kink in the bypass heater hose, which could restrict coolant flow, suggesting it may require replacing for optimal performance, though @Vitaminc914 downplays the urgency of the repair due to limited winter use. @Richardfettig suggests a fix for the battery cables but implies there may be an underlying issue with performance. The mention of problems like the heater hose and potential oil leaks gives a glimpse into the vehicle’s needs despite its overall positive reception, highlighting that while it is well-maintained, there are aspects that could require attention from the new owner.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting it as a "clean Cali beauty" and praising its overall condition. @lincolnsandcaddies enthusiastically notes its "great engine," "great ride," and comfort, while @lockhrt1 describes it as a "very nice example" that deserves a "great and loving home." The seller, @Mikeramir25, appreciates the positive feedback and indicates that the car is exceptionally well-preserved, presenting more like a "museum-quality example" than a typical driver. Additionally, enthusiasts like @V-baby and @KazakhHauler share their positive experiences with similar models, emphasizing the reliability of the 4.9L engine and reminiscing about fond memories related to the Cadillac brand.
Neutral: Some comments clarify the details about the vehicle's designation. @Mikeramir25 addresses the confusion surrounding the Spring Edition label, confirming that this Sedan DeVille does not possess the full Spring Edition package as some commenters noted. @bringatrailer acknowledges the update to the listing regarding the trim level after a suggestion from the community. Commenters like @Jstab ask questions about specific components, such as the dashboard and headliner condition, which the seller addresses thoroughly, showcasing an openness to inquiries.
Negative: There is significant contention regarding the vehicle's classification as a Spring Edition. @lockhrt1 firmly states that the car is inaccurately represented, detailing specific identifying features of the Spring Edition it lacks, and emphasizes the importance of clear communication to prospective buyers. Other commenters like @Happyguy1963 echo this sentiment with their assertion that this is "1000 percent not a Spring Edition." The seller, while acknowledging the points made, reassures the community that the car's performance and condition stand out regardless of the classification, aiming to alleviate concerns about misrepresentation.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received positive remarks regarding its condition and reliability. @Britishclassic, the seller, emphasizes that the car is safe and well cared for, with no significant deterioration in the paint, noting it's presentable with only minor scratches. Commenters like @classiccarman57 praise the car's overall quality, supporting the claim that it is a very quick and comfortable vehicle, and provides insights about the brand's recognition.
Neutral: There are several neutral comments that raise questions about the vehicle's specifics, such as its storage conditions and maintenance history. @lhaag inquires about receipts for work done and whether the paint issues can be restored. @GP65 asks about the age of the tires and potential leaks, indicating a need for clearer visibility regarding these factors. Overall, the responses reflect a mix of interest and requests for further detailed information from potential buyers.
Negative: Some negative feedback focuses on concerns regarding the vehicle's undercarriage and signs of wear. @artreality expresses disappointment with the undercarriage photos, questioning the vehicle's indoor storage history, while @jbr4th asks if the car was stored outdoors for much of its life. Furthermore, concerns about discoloration in the headliner and possible cracks in the alloy wheels highlight that not all aspects of the vehicle are favorably perceived.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed that the vehicle is overall a good choice, particularly for those who appreciate classic trucks. @JIMMY mentioned that the Ford engine is reliable and will last a long time, referring to it as the "perfect Grandpa truck." @cyclemikey also emphasized the truck's longevity, suggesting it could easily run for another 130,000 miles. @TPH56 reminisced about their own experience with a similar model, indicating that it has been a great vehicle in the past. Furthermore, @Dhturk noted that the truck has "good bones," signaling that it has potential for upgrades, and @cozadowen appreciated the feedback from potential buyers, pledging to provide more information to ensure transparency during the sale.
Neutral: Several comments raised questions about the truck's features and condition. @nayls142 inquired about whether the truck was equipped with a carburetor, and @Dhturk suggested considering an engine rebuild while replacing outdated components. Comments regarding the air conditioning system included questions about its functionality and installation, with @acemobilesrq suggesting that it might be an aftermarket addition. @Michaelsmn and @ettev15z discussed the possibility of the high idle switch being connected to the air conditioning system, speculating its practical uses. Additionally, the seller, @cozadowen, provided clarifications about the truck's previous ownership and modifications, revealing plans to make more videos of the vehicle in action.
Negative: On the downside, the truck has drawn attention for its emissions issues, particularly in California, indicating that it cannot be sold to in-state buyers due to failing smog tests. @Smilinpat pointed out that the emissions problems could stem from neglected maintenance rather than inherent flaws in the vehicle itself. Several comments highlighted the truck's cosmetic wear, including @cyclemikey mentioning that the roof paint looks questionable and the tailgate appears tweaked. @velocipede expressed skepticism about the air conditioning system's ability to function properly, while @Hairball and @Smilinpat engaged in a debate about California's stringent emission regulations, underscoring that these standards can impact the desirability of older vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praises the vehicle as a wonderful 290 Cabriolet B project that deserves to be restored to its former glory. @59turner comments on the phenomenal condition of everything involved, indicating it's a great starting point for restoration. @Jbdangelo315 (The Seller) assures that the restoration work on the vehicle has been expertly executed, highlighting that the wood body framing is in great condition and that the project just needs someone to take it to the finish line.
Neutral: @austin_alfa notes the importance of the numerous trim bits included in the sale, emphasizing that they are crucial for the project. @lee2dee2 is interested in learning more about the texture of the original leather, hinting at the historical value of the materials. @schmock88 inquires about the type of paint used on the body, while @brakeservo offers to assist the ultimate buyer by connecting them with local resources for parts and insights based on personal experiences.
Negative: @brakeservo expresses concerns about the missing hood and the viability of finding compatible parts, sharing a story from experience that indicates the rarity of such components. @AmjadY sums up the situation by stating that the project might require a donor car to complete, due to the missing elements like the hood and seats. Additionally, @hmagno and other commenters also point out the potential difficulties in sourcing necessary parts, which could render the restoration a risky endeavor.
|
 |
Positive: @OutOfMyElement praised the beauty of the vehicle, reminiscing fondly about their past experience with a Saab. @carelallen described it as a sweet 96 with extra 'giddy up', showing enthusiasm for the fun factor of the car. @Valiantjim expressed admiration for the rear quarter reshaping, noting that such aesthetic changes often look wrong on other cars but are appealing here. @JIMMY showcased excitement about the car’s power, highlighting its 150 horsepower, which he felt was well-suited for the model. Many commenters, like @bringatrailer and @BoxerRanch, noted the desire for driving videos and a walkaround to further showcase its features.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific details of the vehicle, such as @berfinroy asking about the compression ratio and fuel requirements, and @ICandB inquiring about the car's current needs and fuel tank size. @nickdoc remarked on the thoughtful execution of the build and noted discrepancies regarding the roll bar visuals. Additionally, @warwood requested an estimate on shipping costs to Connecticut while @Drdjet provided a suggested range for transportation expenses, indicating practical concerns regarding logistics without affecting the vehicle's appeal.
Negative: Despite the overall positive vibe, some comments reflected skepticism about the sale and logistics. @jim_rosenthal humorously noted that every photo gives off a gloomy vibe reminiscent of a classic film, indicating a potential disconnect between the vehicle's aesthetic and its presentation. @kubist and @Francols raised issues regarding shipping and geographical limitations that could complicate potential buyers' interest, with @warwood specifically asking about costs and @nickdoc questioning the presence of certain aftermarket parts. Overall, the discussions revealed little negativity but reminded potential buyers of the practical challenges associated with purchasing and shipping this unique vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the 2009 Ford F-250 Lariat, highlighting its beautiful condition and low mileage. @pjh4064, the seller, shares a heartfelt backstory about the truck being cherished by the original owner, Bob, and emphasizes its flawless performance and meticulous maintenance. @OutlawAnything notes that it is a beautiful and well-kept truck, hoping it finds a nice new home, while @AlexmVagon believes this is the best-looking generation of the Powerstrokes. The seller further confirms the truck remains original and untouched, contributing to its unique appeal in the market.
Neutral: On the practical side, prospective buyers ask for more specific information, including the type of bed of the truck as @BobEdsel inquires about the box size, which @gullylurk clarifies as a short bed/box. Additionally, @BMcD raises concerns about the lack of routine maintenance details on the CarFax report, to which @pjh4064 reassures that all maintenance records are available and were well documented by the previous owner. Questions about changes in diesel regulations and the presence of DEF are addressed, confirming the truck is free of newer emissions systems, as noted in the exchanges between @pjh4064 and other users.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism regarding the truck's engine model and performance longevity. @Dairyman mentions a perceived discrepancy in the body style compared to earlier models and worries about the 6.4 diesel engine not being a classic. @BabyD69 suggests that the engine requires tuning and modifications to ensure reliability, hinting at concerns over potential mechanical issues. Additionally, @mostlyfords advises on the necessity of researching the 6.4 Power Stroke prior to a purchase, implying that prospective buyers should be cautious about its maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received praise for its impressive service history, having been consistently serviced at a reputable dealership, Porsche of San Diego, before being sold. @Bbroetsky (The Seller) noted that the car is appealing due to its low miles driven in the last six years and described it as a great entry point into the 911 series. Commentor @ONLYINUTAH shared a positive experience with a similar model, reinforcing the notion that the 997.1 is a solid choice for driving enthusiasts. Additionally, @01996tt and @gemulgrew complimented the detailed presentation of the auction and the quality of the videos and photos provided, highlighting the transparency of the seller in showcasing the vehicle's condition and history.
Neutral: Several questions and comments from the community focused on specific technical aspects and potential issues, reflecting a desire for additional insights into the vehicle's condition. For instance, @Segura911 and @phil88m6 inquired about the IMS bearing and suggested a bore scope inspection. @Bbroetsky (The Seller) clarified that the inspection options are available at the buyer's expense, showcasing a willingness to assist without being combative. Inquiries about oil consumption and service records were also common, with @theguygrm asking about the TPMS system functionality and requesting more detailed images of specific vehicle aspects, such as the roof dents.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's maintenance and potential issues, particularly about the rear main seal and the unknown status of the IMS bearing. @zozolib asked about the complexity and cost of replacing the rear main seal, while @Rdb3035 questioned the frequency of tie rod replacements, hinting at possible underlying concerns. Additionally, skepticism arose surrounding the reports from Carfax and Autocheck, with @theguygrm suggesting that the car had been in an accident based on these reports, which @Bbroetsky (The Seller) contested, promoting an atmosphere of distrust towards vehicle history reports. Overall, while the car had many admirers, questions remained regarding its mechanical integrity.
|
 |
Positive: @RPM911 expresses sheer love for the vehicle, stating, "OMG I’m in love." @TonyDiet adds to this enthusiasm by exclaiming that it embodies "dream car stuff right here." @JGraham appreciates the car's color combination and maintenance level, commenting on the low mileage and rarity of such vehicles in the U.S. @Vic (The Seller) shows great pride in the car, noting its stunning condition with zero rust and a clean interior, further enhancing the vehicle's appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in practical discussions regarding aspects of the vehicle. @Spinwell expresses interest in viewing the car in person and @Vic (The Seller) offers to arrange that. @autokunst raises concerns about possible damage on the underside of the car, urging the seller to clarify the condition. @heeltoes queries the presence of European plates despite the car being titled in Oregon, with other users adding similar observations. @Vic (The Seller) clarifies that the plates were left on for aesthetic reasons, but the new owner will need to register the vehicle with local plates. Discussions about shipping and tariffs are highlighted with @JGraham providing insights on the costs involved in importing classic cars.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition are prominent in several comments. @Dedika notes issues with rust and poor photos of critical areas, asking for closer inspection images. @rusty66 shares suspicions that undercoating might be hiding rust, while also expressing disappointment in the lack of maintenance records. @e9er and @evansw46 argue about the authenticity of the wheels, suggesting they are replicas which could affect the perceived value. This ongoing dialogue about the car's potential issues, combined with a general demand for more transparency regarding its history and condition, leads to a less favorable view of the vehicle from these users.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed positive feedback about the vehicle, highlighting its appealing aesthetics and modifications. @Mayjer complimented its look, mentioning it is fitted with a great MkII hood and grille while also pointing out that it could easily be reverted back to a MkI. @SwiftFF5 and @JWHBOOMER mentioned their admiration for the Cosmic wheels and wood dash, respectively, with the latter noting the car has aged better than him. Others like @Dandan401 and @Aridgerunner described the car as potentially fun to drive, with the latter praising the outer sills, while @Northernrover referred to it as a neat ride with nice modifications. Overall, there were numerous statements of goodwill and wishes for the seller, such as GLWTA (Good Luck With The Auction).
Neutral: Several comments included inquiries or neutral observations about the vehicle's specifications and its condition. @Delawaremike asked about the final drive ratio, while @maw06 sought clarity on various features, including whether the car comes with a British Motor Industry Heritage Trust certificate and about specific issues with the hood alignment. @Duncan_same_old expressed curiosity about the handling effects of the rear sway bar and mentioned the potential modifications that may have been made without much deeper scrutiny. Additionally, inside discussions about potential legal concerns regarding the 'blue dot' lenses pointed to an interest in the car's compliance and functionality rather than just its appearance.
Negative: There were some concerns raised regarding the vehicle's condition and authenticity, with @mistermister1 providing a critical evaluation of the sills, noting discrepancies in the restoration methods from original Mini standards and advising caution to potential buyers. @maw06 pointed out the misalignment of the hood and grill, indicating possible latch issues, while @1071S expressed skepticism regarding the restoration quality beneath the shiny surface. A few commenters like @aaronpark123 and @wishful echoed the perception that the seller's lack of engagement and responsiveness may impact the auction's outcome, suggesting potential buyers should be wary of such factors when considering purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @LarryP expresses enthusiasm, calling the vehicle "wonderful," while @LB1 and @STIDre both share their admiration, referring to it as "nice" and "dope." @MasonPhillips mentions that the custom bug made him smile, praising the work done on it. Additionally, @JackVetter finds the conversion to be "badass" and well executed, echoing the sentiments of @dalebeaman who believes this vehicle should be valued higher due to its fun nature. Overall, many commenters agree that the conversion is a fantastic and unique take on a classic vehicle, blending creativity with nostalgia.
Neutral: Several commenters raise practical questions and comments about the vehicle. @barrelguy inquires about seat adjustments for taller drivers, while @dzdreed asks specific questions regarding the bed's dimensions, its functionality, and whether the clutch is functioning well. @Embermen (The Seller) provides detailed responses, sharing that the seats are fully adjustable and that the bed measures 39.5" wide and 60.5" long. Comments also include inquiries about registration status and the absence of a bed cover, with @Embermen clarifying that the vehicle is titled as a sedan and there is neither a cover nor an outside handle for the tailgate, though modifications could be made easily.
Negative: Some commenters display skepticism or suggest improvements that could be made. @RottenRattner points out a discrepancy regarding the hood being repainted, while @rexfox inquires whether any bondo was used on the seams, indicating concern over the build quality. @gauldingr suggests using factory VW taillights instead of the current aftermarket ones. Furthermore, @Karnut45 questions whether the rattling noise exists and the source of it while expressing a need for more information about mechanical work done. Overall, there seems to be a cautious evaluation by some commenters who want assurances on the build's integrity and functionality.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praised the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, highlighting the combination of the black interior with red stitching as particularly striking. @BOOOM expressed admiration for the design, calling it 'gorgeous.' Several users, like @jk911nut, echoed this sentiment, noting the car's overall beauty. @BillG993 remarked on the car being one of the best-spec'd examples he has seen lately, while @hpizking appreciated the sport seats, believing they signify quality. @MPM97turbo also acknowledged the car's spec, asserting it to be a benchmark in the category.
Neutral: Some comments provided technical insights or requests for further information regarding the car's features. @Jusaur inquired about the paint meter readings, prompting @911r (The Seller) to confirm refinished areas common for the model. Others like @dollarbills69 and @mpgandco sought clarity on undercarriage pictures and specific components, indicating an interest in the vehicle's condition and modifications. @Darkisland presented a contrasting viewpoint on the car's rarity, bringing a comparative analysis with the Ford GT, which sparked discussions about the perception of value among the audience.
Negative: A few comments noted concerns regarding the car's condition and authenticity of modifications. @JetCity993RS pointed out the driver seat's appearance, mentioning it looked cracked and undernourished due to the Arizona sun. @manbatman added a critical perspective on the all-black color scheme’s heat retention properties, suggesting it might not be practical in hotter conditions. Discussions also arose around aftermarket modifications, particularly regarding the steering wheel and carbon fiber additions, with some commenters feeling these detracted from the vehicle's originality and factory specifications.
|
 |
Positive: @bhoffma1 described the Jeep as a 'Cool Jeep!' and mentioned that these vehicles are known for their durability, stating that they 'just keep on running forever.' @demteam praised the Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.0 as the best snow car, emphasizing its excellent performance in snowy conditions, even outperforming larger trucks and SUVs.
Neutral: @branieldanigan, the seller, noted that the vehicle is equipped with the largest tire size compatible with the stock ride height, explaining that no lift kit was installed. They provided details on the spare tire storage situation due to increased tire size and discussed the speedometer's accuracy with the new tires, indicating the speed difference observed while driving. They also confirmed that no issues have arisen with the cooling system since a gasket replacement in late 2024, and mentioned the windshield chip has not been professionally repaired.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about various aspects of the vehicle. @FDNY29 inquired about the vehicle's suitability for a long trip, while @BFD specifically asked if the windshield chip had been addressed. Additionally, @Dbro312 raised a question regarding whether there is adequate space in the wheel wells for chains, indicating a potential issue with compatibility as a result of the larger tires.
|
17k-Mile 1984 Nissan 300ZX Turbo 50th Anniversary 5-Speed
JN1CZ14S8EX008532
Lot 225606
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle's exceptional condition and the seller's dedication. @z31_Kouki described it as an 'epic car' while @Gmmuscleusa highlighted its low mileage and specific features. Many other commenters, including @BirbButInBrackets and @TetonPass77, praised the seller for their effort in maintaining the car, showcasing detailed documentation and insisting that it represents a pristine example of a 50th Anniversary Edition. Several users, like @Discobob and @mid60soldsfan, shared nostalgic experiences tied to the car's model, reinforcing a strong communal appreciation for its allure and engineering.
Neutral: Some comments focused on specific aspects of the car, particularly regarding conditions like the electronic dashboard and paint quality. @cardr1 asked about the originality of the paint, while @CARCOLLECTOR625 and @CaliAEFan inquired about the functionality of the AC and dashboard indicators overall. @Dalm22 provided insight on a common issue related to the vehicle's T-tops, but did not convey significant concern. These inquiries indicate that while there is admiration for the car, potential buyers are looking for clarity and assurance about its condition and functionality.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about specific issues, particularly relating to the electronic dashboard and maintenance needs. @CaliAEFan noted potential discrepancies in the oil pressure and fuel level indicators, while @elburnite's comment about the necessity of repairs based on mileage faced criticism from others who felt it showed a lack of understanding about vintage car maintenance. Moreover, the seller mentioned a persistent battery warning light that could not be resolved, which might give some buyers pause. Despite these concerns, most users seemed to trust the seller's transparency and commitment to preserving the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Matt described the car as a "sweet spot" with a "great and rare spec," highlighting its desirability. @UnclePeco also praised the vehicle, stating it's a rare find with reasonable miles and that it is a beautiful example that someone can drive for years without losing money on depreciation. Several commenters, including @Bullish and @Juggs44, admired the excellent aesthetics of the aftermarket wheels, suggesting that they enhance the car's visual appeal beyond the OEM options.
Neutral: @bill930p (The Seller) actively engaged with the commenters, promising to provide additional information and videos on the car's condition, including detailed underside photos that potential buyers desired. @icubs1 inquired if the car had been previously sold, leading to discussions about the vehicle's specifications and service history. Overall, the conversation reflected a mix of curiosity about the car's details and appreciation for its unique features.
Negative: @some_dude expressed concerns about the aftermarket modifications, questioning the purpose of the replacement springs and the condition of tires, which raised concerns regarding potential wear from road conditions. @Denniec countered statements about the car's rarity, noting that similar models were currently available on auction platforms. @Jessannjoh's inquiries about possible repainted areas indicated a skepticism about the car's authenticity, which might concern potential buyers about the vehicle's history.
|
Original-Owner 2017 Toyota Tacoma TRD Off-Road Double Cab 4×4 V6
3TMCZ5AN6HM070136
Lot 225608
Private Party
 |
Positive: @KeeterVermont complimented the truck's appearance, referring to it as a nice looking Taco, and expressed interest in the brand of the roof/topper rack. @overlandish praised the modifications made to the vehicle, describing it as a tastefully modified sweet adventure ride. The Seller, @909mnicks, provided detailed information about the roof racks, confirming that they are Prinsu Designs by CBI fabrication and also mentioned including load panels for the racks in the sale. This highlights the thoughtful upgrades and additional features that enhance the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: @Jonm440i raised a question about the ownership history, noting a discrepancy between the seller's claim of being the original owner and the Carfax report suggesting otherwise. @909mnicks clarified that he leased the truck before purchasing it, thus explaining the confusion regarding ownership. The Seller also mentioned the change of registration from Virginia to Minnesota, which provides additional context to the vehicle's history. @emonomics noted the presence of features like the sunroof and JBL audio system, while questioning the absence of leather seats, suggesting that such details might have changed in later models.
Negative: @IL_Rod expressed concern regarding the listing of a potential lien on the vehicle, questioning whether it needed to be paid off as part of the sale. Although @909mnicks responded by stating that the truck is paid off and has no lien, the initial inquiry indicates some uncertainty surrounding the vehicle's financial status. This could potentially deter some buyers who might be wary of hidden debts associated with the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and features. @Bschurr highlighted the 'amazing color' and described the 'beautiful Road Glide.' @YankeeDixie praised the bike for the substantial upgrades and modifications worth about $10,000, noting the low mileage of only 266. This commentary reinforces the value of the bike and the thoughtful alterations made, making it appealing to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several discussions revolved around the specifications and details of the bike. @Hank470, the seller, clarified that the OEM parts removed from the bike were not included in the sale and addressed questions regarding the saddlebag design tied with the factory sound system. Questions from @sfmonster23 and @HSKinc focused on the alignment of the components and the nature of the controls, with @Hank470 providing thorough responses and even reaching out to the dealership for clarification, suggesting a good level of transparency in the communication.
Negative: However, there were concerns regarding the bike's condition and compliance. @sfmonster23 noted potential alignment issues with the rear fender, suggesting it may not be visually accurate, while @pearlmacd raised critical points about the bike's compliance with California emissions standards, stating it likely has a 49 state VIN number and would not meet regulations for California. This brought up concerns for potential buyers from that state, indicating that while the bike offers many upgrades, they must also factor in the limitations regarding emissions compliance.
|
 |
Positive: @JAY-Z noted that the 981 model will likely be regarded as the best of the Boxster/Cayman series, highlighting the particular car's appealing black and espresso color scheme. @Reid echoed this sentiment, expressing his admiration for the espresso interior, which he considers a crucial selling point. The seller, @bill930p, emphasized the car's amazing condition and promised to provide videos to showcase its features.
Neutral: @Tachycardia requested more details about the described mild and moderate damage, as well as photos of the damage and repairs, indicating a need for transparency. @UMBMotorCo referred to the specifications as bland, while @texredr defended them, calling the car a perfect spec with fewer things that could go wrong. Several comments mentioned videos shared by @bill930p, including cold start and walk around videos, although their content was not explicitly discussed by the commentators.
Negative: @JessicaM expressed disappointment over the lack of heated seats, indicating a feature that some potential buyers might find essential. @Tachycardia's inquiry about damage suggested concerns about the vehicle's history and possible undisclosed issues, which could raise red flags for interested buyers. Additionally, despite some praises, @UMBMotorCo's description of the specs as bland could imply a perception that the car may not meet the excitement levels some enthusiasts expect.
|
 |
Positive: @Vander presents a strong rebuttal as the previous seller, stating that the car was extensively serviced and describes the M113 engine as one of the best, which puts the vehicle in a favorable light for potential bidders. @Dean_Laumbach reflects positively on the condition of the car, asserting that the engine bay, undercarriage, and interior are immaculate, and that the car represents a great buying opportunity even considering the maintenance history. @bigmike55 calls it the "Holy Grail of 129’s," further establishing its desirability despite earlier concerns.
Neutral: @ram_g voices a commonly shared uncertainty regarding low-mileage vehicles needing more repairs than those regularly driven. He and @gscharnagl emphasize that factors like long periods without active use can lead to various issues that affect performance, suggesting that bidders should consider the potential trade-offs when dealing with classic cars. @Dean_Laumbach and others highlight that low mileage doesn’t necessarily equate to a lack of issues, advocating for thorough inspections and due diligence before purchasing.
Negative: A number of commenters express skepticism about the car's condition given the significant repairs reported for a vehicle with only 9,000 miles, with @2000ls5 and @Kaaawa indicating it raises red flags and questioning the overall transparency of the seller. @ram_g notes the documented maintenance oversights and the impact of long-term storage on the vehicle's condition. @Kaaawa and others shared reservations on the prior myths of low-mileage cars, considering them potential red flags instead of guarantees of quality, suggesting caution for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commentators are very enthusiastic about the Blazer's aesthetic and craftsmanship. @Redbone1 expresses love for the Blazer irrespective of its color, while @DogNutRadio describes it as 'perfection.' @boaboyoz calls it 'dynamite' and praises its beautiful build. @Captainpua reflects positively on the Blazer, reminiscing about their own experience with a similar model, and sends good luck wishes to bidders and the serious seller of this classic. Additional praise comes from @Samerar1 and @PontiacNut, who label the vehicle as 'bad ass' and 'gorgeous' respectively. Overall, there is a general appreciation for the build quality, including the attention to detail noted by @steve575 and @5.0THIS, who comment on the unique features like the exhaust work and craftsmanship.
Neutral: Some comments focus on clarifications about the Blazer's structure and features, notably regarding the hardtop. @Escalon_Customs (The Seller) mentions that the vehicle was intentionally built without a top but reassures potential buyers that a top can be added later if desired. There is also discussion about the vehicle's engine, with @Valiantjim questioning whether the engine is indeed a small block or a big block, to which @Escalon_Customs provides clarity. Commenters like @Goldmember1 raise practical concerns about manufacturing the perfect top to maintain the vehicle's integrity, suggesting drilling holes for future installations. Other inquiries include logistical considerations for shipping and registering the vehicle in different states, addressed by @Minton99 and @Bella9119.
Negative: While the overall reception of the vehicle is largely positive, a few comments express reservations or seek clarity. @Valiantjim raises an issue about the notion of the vehicle's engine size being potentially misleading, indicating a lack of trust in descriptions. Similarly, @surfdoc37 questions the practicality of owning a vehicle with AC but no roof, highlighting concerns for those in less sunny climates. @tlcamg implies that every build should ideally have AC to avoid future complaints about its absence. Additionally, there is some lighthearted banter about the vehicle's color—@PSFarm calls it 'Yella' while dismissing its designation as 'Ochre,' which suggests some confusion regarding the model's specifics.
|
 |
Positive: @hydraautomotive (The Seller) has received enthusiastic feedback about the Porsche, highlighting its enjoyable driving experience. He noted that it has been meticulously maintained and is in excellent condition, particularly mentioning its recent oil change and new brakes. Commentors like @GDogg have praised the aesthetics of the car and the quality of the promotional videos provided, while @saa106 appreciated the unique color of the vehicle, describing it as an amazing spec. @JP-Select also commended the striking color and its appeal, adding to the overall positive sentiments echoing through the comments.
Neutral: Some inquiries arose concerning technical specifications and features of the vehicle. @Taisho asked about the operational nature of the spoiler, while @Touch0fRed sought clarification regarding the types of maintenance performed, specifically the new brake installation and possibly the 40k-mile service needs. There were further requests for details about the sunroof and the condition of the door cards, indicating that potential buyers are looking for thoroughness and transparency in the auction process.
Negative: Concerns were expressed about minor issues with the car, particularly relating to the interior components. @houae23 questioned the protrusion of the exhaust tips, while others like @Touch0fRed noted potential damage to the sun visor cover and the state of the door cards, suggesting they might show signs of warping—a common issue for that model. Commenter @111r humorously noted their disapproval of the car's use of air fresheners, reflecting a desire for an authentic Porsche experience. Additionally, @tahoesale and @Taisho raised questions about the car’s history with smoking, further emphasizing the thorough scrutiny buyers apply to the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @RumbleAuto notes that these vehicles have achieved iconic status, making them nearly as enjoyable as any car can be to drive. @hpizking shares a personal experience with his bone stock low mile 2014 Track edition, expressing surprise at how much he enjoys driving it, especially given his background as a Porsche enthusiast. He mentions that he is happy to have purchased it before prices surged and has no intention of ever selling it, highlighting the car's exceptional quality. @JLsKA510 compliments the vehicle's stunning and clean appearance, reiterating the positivity surrounding the car.
Neutral: @warehouseofspeed (The Seller) remarks on the rapid activity in the bidding process, indicating that bids are approaching the reserve price. They note that the reserve has since been removed, which could heighten the interest further. @nexusautobrokers raises a question regarding a potentially confusing situation with bidding amounts and suggests the possibility of an unusual increase in bid because of a personal story shared by @AKLeader, who seems mildly concerned but not overly worried since the bidding was near reserve at that point.
Negative: @AKLeader expresses frustration over a higher-than-expected bid, which was influenced by a personal situation involving his granddaughter. He is inquiring about options to rectify this unusual situation. @R35Spirit points out that the current highest bid may deter other potential bidders, indicating a negative shift in bidder confidence due to the high bidding price.
|
 |
Positive: @Scoupe891 mentioned that it's a clean coupe in very nice condition, indicating it has been well cared for. @Mackiesback shared their appreciation for the car's cleanliness, acknowledging that it's rare to see coupes in such good shape. @ChasinFords praised the color Royal Maroon and suggested that the vehicle could benefit from aesthetic upgrades like pinstripes. @carpb4 also commented positively on the car's styling, recalling their own good experiences with a similar vehicle, and expressing enthusiasm about its features.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed interest in learning more about the vehicle. @Mafear asked for details about the header replacement and suggested a running video to enhance the listing. @Cw55ford inquired about the air conditioning, to which @weitzmann, the seller, confirmed that it works and they also checked the heater. The seller responded positively to inquiries about modifications, noting the potential addition of a hood scoop in the future and the inclusion of a Marti report to provide essential information for potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments highlighted uncertainties and room for improvement in the listing. @Gopher428 pointed out that the seller should provide detailed explanations and suggested that the lack of a thorough description may affect bidding confidence. @Mackiesback remarked that there were many details left unanswered and that the seller should be more communicative to establish trust. @gauldingr commented that transportation quotes were outrageously expensive, which could be a concern for potential buyers, and @Cw55ford expressed skepticism about the car's reliability for long drives, given the seller's limited experience with the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters are praising the 1948 Chevrolet 3600 Pickup for its stunning build quality and impressive features. @Barryward highlighted the vehicle's appeal, noting it looks great, while @boaboyoz admired the sweet design of the truck and wished good luck with the auction. @mike_rockwell appreciated the detailed build, calling it nicely clean and highlighting the unique aftermarket ribbed bumpers. @LutzMultimediaLLC expressed wonder at the substantial investment made in the vehicle, recognizing the passion behind its refurbishment. @Danno9 simply stated it is a beautiful truck, excited about the potential of acquiring it.
Neutral: Several comments provide technical observations or inquiries about specific features and modifications. @Mbaumb54 pointed out the running boards' craftsmanship and questioned their origin, while @Ibuildm questioned the purpose of the horizontal shock absorber mounted behind the rear end. @Davebrookins raised a practical concern regarding interior cab space for taller drivers, leading to a response from @classiccarslasvegas who confirmed comfort for someone of his height. The seller has actively engaged with potential buyers, providing insights on the vehicle's specifications and addressing queries directly.
Negative: Not all feedback was entirely positive, as some users pointed out minor issues or raised concerns. @Spudster mentioned that some might not favor the bumpers, likening them to diner decor from the 50s, which could be seen as a less favorable aesthetic element. @1Hotshot's comment, although intended to compliment, implied that the vehicle's appearance is more of a gimmick, which could reflect a divide in taste among potential buyers. Additionally, @DJW48 questioned the driving comfort for taller individuals, suggesting mixed experiences that might deter some from the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @Witcher458Spider describes the 2015 Ferrari California T as "absolutely spectacular" in a striking Nero/Rosso color scheme, while @Guilianna25 praises the beautiful interior design of the vehicle. @Keehln32 (The Seller) appreciates the compliments about the interior and confirms there are no issues with sticky buttons. Furthermore, @boaboyoz finds the car to be extremely attractive, labeling it as 'dead sexy', and @foreignaffairsmotorsport highlights its loaded specifications, wishing everyone good luck with the auction.
Neutral: Several comments focus on clarity regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @dakrei questions the reason for the transmission replacement at just 26k miles, speculating on whether it suffered abuse or was simply maintained to a high standard given the significant maintenance costs. @Keehln32 (The Seller) addresses these concerns by stating the gearbox had a two-year warranty and clarifies that the car has never been tracked. There was an error noted in the CarFax, and @Keehln32 promises to fix it as he is the sole owner, responding to inquiries with helpful information, though he lacks an OBD-2 scanner to provide engine hours as requested by @Majorohio.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns regarding the vehicle's history and repairs, with @dakrei and @Germanfanatic probing into the gearbox replacement and suggesting it might indicate prior issues. @Sintorion notes a potential leak associated with past repairs, making it sound similar to another questionable unit. @Majorohio insists that engine hours are crucial for verifying the car's true mileage while @Msweetnam admires the vehicle's looks but expresses a personal dislike for the red interior. Overall, despite the car being highly regarded, there's a level of skepticism surrounding its maintenance and history.
|
 |
Positive: @DNAAutohaus (The Seller) describes the vehicle as an "ABSOLUTELY incredible 1984 K5 Blazer Silverado 4x4" that has undergone extensive restoration and upgrades totaling over $65,000 since its purchase. The car has a fresh engine, transmission, and enhancements to the wiring, gauges, suspension, and more, all aimed at ensuring it is a high-quality, forever vehicle for its next owner. Its appeal is emphasized through its aesthetic presence, eliciting smiles and thumbs-ups from passersby, indicating a strong, enjoyable ownership experience.
Neutral: @DNAAutohaus (The Seller) shares that potential bidders can connect easily via calls or video calls to discuss the vehicle. They encourage in-person visits, acknowledging that many bidders may not be local. Both the warehouse where the car is stored and the bidding process are described with transparency, allowing bidders to feel secure in their decisions. Additionally, the auction has been extended due to scheduling conflicts, reflecting responsiveness to the community's needs.
Negative: Some comments bring up concerns regarding a $125 document fee mentioned by @flyfaster and @gauldingr, implying it might deter potential bidders. @Hotrodslayer raised valid questions about the truck's body condition, noting potential issues like orange peel or touch-ups on the paint, and inquired about the engine's history due to smoke observed upon revving. @DNAAutohaus (The Seller) addressed these concerns, ensuring that all clarifications would be provided promptly, such as the vehicle height and confirming no significant paint defects.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle, highlighting its appeal and enhancements. @Kasey praised the Revel for being a great vehicle for travel, indicating that they love their own model. @NFellows noted tasteful modifications, while also acknowledging the features like the dinette from Canyon Adventures, which can serve multiple purposes despite not being used for sleeping. @Nimbostratus, a Sprinter owner, mentioned their positive experiences with the platform, suggesting that Revels are well-regarded among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several questions posed by various users aimed to clarify specific features and issues regarding the vehicle. @ThreePalmsFun inquired about the height of the AC unit, while @Levinagan wanted to know about the mileage on the Ridge Grappler tires and whether a PedalBox was installed. Comments from @s-2000 and @MCTECH discussed the black coating over the factory finish, suggesting it may be a bed-liner intended to prevent rust damage. The conversation revealed an active engagement in understanding the vehicle's specifications and conditions.
Negative: There were multiple concerns raised regarding the seller's communication and transparency. @Thomas2112 expressed significant distrust, noting the lack of responses to numerous inquiries and suggesting that this behavior raised red flags about the deal's integrity. @Skap44 echoed similar sentiments by questioning the seller's responsiveness, particularly regarding the air fresheners which raised suspicions about potential smoke odors in the vehicle. Additionally, @Billium apologized for not fully understanding the information provided but also pointed out a glaring issue with missing details on significant questions, contributing to a sense of unease in the transaction.
|
 |
Positive: @JAY-Z mentioned that the vehicle looks like a fun Jeep for snowy conditions, highlighting an appealing aspect of the vehicle's design and functionality. Additionally, @zachdahl (The Seller) provided driving videos showcasing the vehicle's smooth operation, noting that it drives straight with tight steering and minimal wind noise. The gauges were confirmed to be functional, adding to the positive assessment of its condition.
Neutral: Some commenters requested additional information and visuals, such as @fsacb3 asking to see the floorboards and if there was any rust present, which @zachdahl (The Seller) acknowledged but noted the vinyl covering makes it difficult to inspect. @Hagop102 inquired about the vehicle's performance at highway speeds, prompting @zachdahl (The Seller) to reassure that it drives well and promised driving videos in the near future. @clemsonman also requested a picture of the firewall trim tag, indicating an interest in the vehicle's details.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the potential hidden issues beneath the installed vinyl floor covering, with @DEO emphasizing the need to peel it back for a thorough inspection and suggesting it could be a problem area. Questions from @mikes440 also indicated apprehension about the functionality of multiple components like lights, turn signals, and wipers, implying a lack of confidence in their condition. Overall, while there are positives about its driving performance, the vehicle's condition underlying the vinyl flooring remains uncertain.
|
 |
Positive: @lloyddon1 (The Seller) presents a highly esteemed 1998 Mitsubishi Eclipse GT-T Spyder with an impeccable background, showcasing its one owner status and an astonishing 36k original miles. The comments from potential buyers express admiration for the vehicle's cleanliness and features, with @birdyInPa and @wildwires2000 commending its overall appearance and expressing confidence in bidding based on the dealership's stellar reputation. The seller assures buyers of a hassle-free experience, offering services such as trade-ins, financing options, and climate-controlled storage, which only add to the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: Several inquiries about the car's condition and features show the community's interest and engagement. @scmorgan raises concerns regarding the "Service Engine Soon" light which the seller promptly addresses by confirming that all necessary repairs have been completed before the auction. Similarly, @jocko315 and @mdfdavie ask for specific details about the airbag cover and potential rust, to which the seller pledges to provide more images and information, demonstrating an active effort to clarify any uncertainties about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Despite the positive interactions, some concerns do arise regarding certain aspects of the car's condition. @jocko315 points out a potential issue with the passenger side airbag dash cover, suggesting that it may not be seated correctly, while @mdfdavie raises the valid concern of rust or corrosion. These comments indicate potential reservations from bidders who want assurance about the vehicle's integrity, underscoring the importance of transparency in the auction process.
|
 |
Positive: @Bullish expressed a strong affection for the vehicle, stating, 'Love this.' Additionally, @timberframe mentioned having a similar model, showing continued interest in the vehicle by noting, 'I will be watching.' Furthermore, the comments from @GR8AGN28 highlight a desire for detailed visuals and descriptions, which indicates an engaged interest in understanding the vehicle more thoroughly.
Neutral: @gogounou remarked on the neatness of the engine bay, asking the seller for more information about the installed radiator. @BBAutomotive (The Seller) responded that they were unable to find a manufacturer's name on the radiator but assured that it appeared to be of high quality, emphasizing its good condition and craftsmanship. The seller also addressed @GR8AGN28's inquiry about the clutch, confirming that it is smooth and easy to engage, which is a positive aspect of the vehicle's drivability.
Negative: There are no explicitly negative comments regarding the vehicle. All the remarks reflect curiosity or appreciation, with no indications of dissatisfaction or issues raised by the commenters.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its stunning appearance and exceptional specifications. @Markatoolio highlighted its tastefulness, expressing confidence that the seller would receive a good price. @ChadGee and @JayGonz22 admired the unique color combination and overall design, indicating it was a timeless and beautiful spec. Similarly, @MrCookieMonster referred to the car as beautifully configured, urging the seller to feature one particular photo that showcases its appeal. The seller, @BTCraig, confirmed that feedback was appreciated and shared confidence in the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Several comments focused on technical aspects of the vehicle and the seller's responsive nature. @mynameistimo pointed out that the front axle lift appeared to be engaged in the photos, while @Oufan2929 vouched for the seller's honesty and quality of the car. The seller responded to inquiries about the window sticker and paint protection film (@Nono2055 and @Xodius, respectively), demonstrating an eagerness to engage with potential buyers. Additionally, @BTCraig confirmed that tires had been replaced due to a nail, showing transparency about the vehicle's history.
Negative: The comments section also included some criticisms and questions about the vehicle's features. @the3kgt2 mentioned that the lack of adaptive cruise control was a dealbreaker for them, indicating that some features could deter potential buyers. @bommerts expressed concern over the history of a replaced tire, suggesting scrutiny about the vehicle's condition despite overall positive remarks. Also, the sentiment around the timing of the sale near the holiday season expressed some concern that it might not attract as many buyers as it could have at a different time of year.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting its clean appearance and appealing specs. @jpreston123 (The Seller) emphasized the uniqueness of the 2014 Porsche Cayenne Diesel, particularly noting its rare color combination and extensive features, including the Premium Package Plus and various luxury options. @jclarke5 referred to the vehicle as a 'steal' and encouraged bidders to take its spec into account, which received positive validation from others. The overall sentiment surrounding its condition, features, and potential value was largely favorable among interested parties.
Neutral: Several comments focused on specific inquiries about the vehicle's history and towing capability. @bavaria911 asked about the SUV's towing experiences, which led @jpreston123 (The Seller) to clarify that while he had no personal towing experience, the vehicle's condition suggested it had not been used heavily for towing. Additionally, @mikenolomotel inquired about potential turbo lag post a recall update, and @jpreston123 (The Seller) reassured that the Cayenne Diesel provided a responsive performance without lag, reinforcing the vehicle's quality and driving experience.
Negative: However, there were pointed concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @stdenis25 flagged a noticeable paint mismatch on the passenger side doors, which seemed to detract from the overall appeal. @700HPWagon raised queries about two reported incidents of 'minor damage' on the Carfax report, seeking clarification on the nature of the damages. @jpreston123 (The Seller) responded that the reported damages were cosmetic and did not affect safety or performance, describing them as likely the result of low-speed incidents, but some potential buyers remained cautious regarding these issues.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described as a "Gorgeous Designo Diamond White Metallic over Almond Beige and Mocha" Mercedes Benz GL450 with a wealth of features and a strong performance profile thanks to its 3.0L V6 engine, generating 362 hp. @gscharnagl commented positively about the car's looks, mentioning it's a good-looking ride that's clearly been exercised with just the right amount of mileage. The seller, @aegmotorsports, provides extensive details about the included features such as the P01 Premium Package, Lane Tracking Package, and Parking Assist Package, creating an appealing picture of the vehicle for potential buyers. The seller also reassures interested parties about the quality of the tires and the maintenance records, further establishing confidence in the car's condition.
Neutral: Several commenters raised inquiries regarding specific aspects of the vehicle. @gscharnagl questioned the wear on the driver's seat, while @CC3698 pointed out possible concerns with the dashboard, asking for clarification on scratches and wrinkles. The seller responded to these concerns by clarifying that there is only slight wear on the bolster and that the apparent scratches on the wood were merely reflections in the light. This back-and-forth indicates that potential buyers are actively engaging with the listing and seeking transparency about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: On the downside, questions raised about the car's condition indicate some underlying concerns. @CG3698 noted potential scratches and wrinkles on the dashboard, and @SebastianMax asked about the likelihood of removing door dings, suggesting some imperfections that might detract from the vehicle's overall appearance. Additionally, comments from @RGHLGP regarding service records and air suspension issues imply that potential buyers are wary about maintenance history and mechanical reliability. Although @aegmotorsports provided reassurance about the air suspension's functionality, these concerns could impact buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @Sparrownaut commended the vehicle for its clean underside and proposed it as a strong contender for buyers in the market, despite the common issues with a 45-year-old car. @SlowNRusty remarked on the car's impressive value, likening its quality and craftsmanship to that of luxury brands, and suggested that the purchase would be worthwhile even if unexpected problems arose later. Additionally, @Ilanfeldman4 (The Seller) confidently highlighted the car's durability and his own trouble-free ownership experience, indicating good build quality and lasting performance.
Neutral: Several users raised practical questions and comments regarding specifics of the vehicle's condition, such as @jeffmJerbheuehjej asking for more photos of the driver's door and @Dkahnjob inquiring about maintenance records and the armrest condition. Concerns about the A/C were prevalent, with @PSFarm suggesting that the seller's recommendation to recharge could imply a minor issue rather than a malfunction. @Undatakr pointed out that concerns regarding the mirror control might be due to poor lighting, while @Ilanfeldman4 (The Seller) mentioned that all records would be included in the sale.
Negative: Conversely, there were clear criticisms regarding the A/C situation, notably from @gccch who expressed skepticism about the vague mention of an A/C recharge, implying there could be larger, undisclosed problems. Others echoed these concerns, including @neilpierson25, who noted the risks inherent in the seller's reluctance to thoroughly address the A/C system. Additionally, @gregpryckman raised questions about the color match of the front seats and @AussieBenz criticized the quality of the car's displayed images, indicating the need for professional photos to better assess the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express positive sentiments about the vehicle, highlighting its classic appeal and simplicity. @2002WS6 appreciates the truck's naturally aspirated engine, contrasting it favorably with modern vehicles laden with complex systems. @TPH56 describes it as a fantastic truck, noting features like the 4.10 gears and 4x4 capability, suggesting that both the buyer and seller will be satisfied with the deal. @Preluder also shares enthusiasm for the vehicle, indicating that acquiring such a truck is a no-brainer in today's market, which underscores its desirability among buyers.
Neutral: Several comments include neutral observations and clarifications regarding the vehicle's specifics and condition. @Marxauto, the seller, confirms the wheel size and acknowledges the need for transparency about the vehicle's flaws, including the replacement of worn parts like ball joints and tie rod ends. The seller also addresses queries about the truck's transmission type and reassures potential buyers about its functionality. Comments like those from @Cschold and @Leiniesbuddy attempt to seek clarity on the vehicle's history, such as inquiries about a duplicate title and various repairs, which showcases potential buyers' due diligence.
Negative: There are concerns raised about potential issues with the vehicle, particularly surrounding its reliability. @Car-guy28 points out known issues with the 5R55E transmission, indicating it could begin to show problems after 50,000 miles, raising concerns about its longevity. @adambuff1989 expresses apprehension about the 03-04 model's reliability, specifically mentioning fears about timing chain issues based on negative online reviews. Additionally, inquiries into the vehicle's condition, such as possible cigarette burns and the cause of a dent, suggest buyers are cautious and seeking confirmation that the seller is forthcoming about any potential drawbacks.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @boaboyoz describing it as a 'marvelous maroon Camaro' and a 'delightful example.' @Acorn19 highlighted its suitability as a 'perfect cruiser,' appreciating the understated design. Comments from @HankHorders and @WoodrowWilson reflected nostalgia for the Camaro's styling, with the latter remarking that the car would be a great choice for impressing others. @e9er shared a personal connection, recalling their first car being a similar model and expressing a desire to own this one if it ever became available.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the details about the Camaro's authenticity, particularly regarding its RS status. @67_camaro_rs sought clarification from @funkaholik on specific features that could indicate whether the car is an original RS or a conversion. @911r provided insight into the vehicle's specifications, mentioning that it has all RS parts and the operation of the headlights is vacuum-based. Other commenters reminisced about the design features, like hideaway headlights, and discussed their personal experiences with similar vehicles, reinforcing a sense of camaraderie among enthusiasts.
Negative: Not all feedback was entirely positive, as some commenters raised concerns about the car's authenticity. @funkaholik suggested that without more documentation, it's hard to confirm whether the vehicle is a genuine RS. Despite this uncertainty, they acknowledged the car's beauty. Others, like @w2p, pointed out potential mechanical issues, commenting on the distributor vacuum line not being hooked up initially. Overall, while the car was praised for its appearance, its historical accuracy and mechanical condition seemed to be areas of concern for some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @johnnyvett praised the vehicle for its great appearance with a classy color combo and noted its collectible aspects, calling it a fun fact about the steering wheel options on this model. @Acorn19 described the car as a solid driver and a time capsule, while @HobbyGuy57 (The Seller) highlighted the car's fun driving experience, ability to turn heads, and thumbs-up it receives on the road. @ButWhatDoIKnow described it as a beautiful Vette, and @Zanny1 commented positively on the condition of the vehicle, noting fitting door alignment and decent upkeep, indicating it's a solid example. @borninthe60s echoed these sentiments, calling it a nice-looking Corvette great for weekend cruising.
Neutral: Several comments suggested that potential buyers may want clarification and more information about specific details of the car. @JohnF1966 pointed out that the short ownership duration might raise questions among bidders. @Den1 inquired about the seller's quick resale and requested additional pictures to address concerns about rust spots on the frame. Meanwhile, @HobbyGuy57 (The Seller) provided context for the sale, explaining he lacks space for the car but enjoys driving it. Additionally, @C3-TB and others expressed interest in keeping their own C3 models original and appreciated the exchange of trivia in the comments.
Negative: Concerns arose regarding the vehicle's condition and its history. @Den1 noted rust pitting on the frame and sought clarification on any possible rust holes, asking for clearer under-frame pictures. @Harvey100 questioned the paint's condition, asking for better photos in sunlight due to perceived unevenness. Another comment from @Harvey100 asked if all vehicle components were operational, mentioning AC, heater, and radio. @HobbyGuy57 (The Seller) addressed some of these issues, confirming the A/C needs maintenance and providing information about the paint job being original but previously repainted.
|
|
|