Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, praising its beauty and impressive restoration efforts. @Dollycat3 complimented its condition and color combination, while @Samdukeys described it as a 'real nice one.' @UncleFred1 highlighted the considerable time and money invested in the car's revitalization, appreciating the extensive restoration efforts that have made it a standout within the SL community. Users like @mathew_moore and @Mason103 also acknowledged the quality of work put into the car, emphasizing its attractiveness and suitability for enjoyable weekend drives.
Neutral: Some comments pointed to specific aspects of the car that require attention but did not necessarily detract from the overall appeal. @alchazar noted the peculiar positioning of the hood badge and issues with the sun visors, while @UncleFred1 mentioned the necessity of addressing some rust spots. Others, like @AmjadY, urged patience with the seller in addressing comments and inquiries, suggesting that the listing was fresh and that immediate criticism may not be warranted.
Negative: Criticism surfaced regarding several issues that affected perceptions of the vehicle. @MARKMALEK expressed concern over the extent of rust and the potential repair costs, highlighting that significant restoration work was needed. @lfishman pointed to the importance of addressing even minor faults, such as the misplaced hood emblem and a non-functioning door lock, to ensure the car retains its value. Multiple commenters echoed concerns about the vehicle's age, particularly the tires, with @DoctorA urging the seller to provide clearer photos of existing rust areas to inform prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the excellent work done on the truck, with @WAGONBOYTD calling it a pretty awesome setup. @Rover-Ace emphasizes the high-quality workmanship and provides positive feedback on its features. @westbound-on-olympic appreciates the modifications and suggests that the truck has sufficient power with the existing upgrades, declaring it a great truck overall.
Neutral: Several commenters provided insights into the vehicle's features, such as @Rickardo (The Seller) stating that the throttle pedal is original and that the Rochester carb is properly jetted. @rustyray raised questions about oxidation on the frame, which @Rickardo addressed by noting that the vehicle is a dry Arizona model with only surface rust. Additionally, the vehicle's street legality, operable lights, and cruising ability on highways were confirmed by @Rickardo, ensuring potential buyers have the needed information.
Negative: Concerns about certain vehicle aspects were raised by a few commenters. @rustyray noted areas of oxidation and encapsulated rust, asking for further insights into these issues. @Babadawv pointed out a mismatch in the arrangement of the side windows that would affect visibility, indicating a flaw in what seems otherwise to be an attractive vehicle. Though the vehicle seems solid, these criticisms suggest areas for improvement that potential buyers may want to consider.
![]() |
38-Years-Owned, Nissan 1.4L–Powered 1959 Morris Minor Traveller 5-Speed
MAW3L696620
Lot 226035
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its unique character and historical significance. @MajorMinor shared that the car inspired him to build a similar model, while @Gzilla300 and @Bobbity praised its design and expressed interest in the listing. @wwb3 highlighted its nostalgic value, mentioning how it reflects a range of expired car brands. @rickaz emphasized the benefits of the Nissan engine swap and how it adds fun and reliability to the classic car. Overall, there's a strong sense of appreciation for the car's uniqueness and the joyous memories attached to it.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification about specific features of the vehicle. @OldPaul noted the absence of a photo showing the spare tire's location and requested guidance on where to find it. @GBRBiLL inquired about the condition of the wood on the car, and @o2bnabmw asked whether the trafficators were functioning properly. The seller, @Phleabags, responded to these queries, providing details about the spare tire setup and the wood's condition, as well as confirming functionality of the trafficators. This indicates that while the car is generally well-received, there are still practical questions about its features.
Negative: A few comments contained critiques, particularly about the car's current condition and some of its modifications. @intaglio pointed out that the wood might need refinishing soon, while acknowledging the expertise of the mechanic who worked on the car. However, these comments were more about ensuring the vehicle's longevity and performance rather than outright negative feedback. Overall, the vehicle has elicited a positive reaction, with minor practical concerns rather than significant criticisms.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @LookingForaR35 expressed excitement for the vehicle’s return to the market, indicating he missed it the first time. @OldCarFan complimented the car's appearance, calling it good looking. @6starsgnarly suggested that the car could significantly change a person's life, implying a strong appreciation for its potential value. The seller, @Andrecox1, acknowledged the compliments and confirmed that nothing has changed with the vehicle since it was last auctioned. He mentioned that he believes the car is a solid buy, stating that much time and money has been invested in it.
Neutral: @Andrecox1 provided detailed information about the vehicle’s title history, explaining the complexities of its salvage and rebuilt status. He clarified that the car was originally registered as a show car upon entering the U.S. and underwent several title changes across states. The seller noted that he has gone through the car extensively and has not found any structural issues, offering potential buyers the opportunity for an in-person inspection and test drive, reinforcing the car's current solid condition.
Negative: @J-Hance30 questioned the car's salvage/bonded title status, expressing concern and confusion over its implications. @Woberton inquired about the vehicle's horsepower with its current modifications, hinting at a desire for more performance details. @Datzun raised concerns about the car's idling performance, asking whether it stumbles or dips after stopping. Although @Andrecox1 addressed these concerns by detailing repairs to the air idle control valve, the questions reflect underlying apprehensions regarding the vehicle's reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @greenerdays11 highlights the low mileage of 21k on this 2011 BMW 135i convertible, powered by a turbocharged 3.0-liter inline-six engine paired with a six-speed manual transmission. Commentor @Chuchip expresses their love for the 135 series, noting the perfect size-to-power ratio and the joy of driving such a clean model. Another enthusiast, @weckwerks, appreciates the iconic feel of the BMW drivetrain and admires its driving confidence, praising the car as an 'ultimate driving machine.'
Neutral: @rickst and @ACRX7 request photos of the vehicle's undercarriage, citing a desire to see the overall condition of the suspension and engine. @Imezgoin, despite a strong personal history with the 135 series, notes the car's lack of an M Sport package and suggests that certain modifications could enhance its performance. @greenerdays11 reassures potential buyers by mentioning that additional undercarriage photos were provided, and confirms the car's history of being garage kept with minimal winter exposure, according to the previous owner.
Negative: Concerns have been raised by @SpyderMan981 regarding potential rust and corrosion on the suspension parts, casting doubt on the previous owner's claims about the car's exposure to harsh weather, given the visible wear seen in a specific photo. @ACRX7 also points out the lack of a sport package, suggesting significant upgrades would be necessary to enhance the vehicle's appeal and performance. @Imezgoin adds that the car is equipped with subpar standard suspension and tires, indicating that while it may be a fun drive, it may not provide the thrilling experience expected by some enthusiasts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the truck's condition and features. @ianot describes it as a beautiful truck, while @etbrace, the seller, confirms it runs and drives excellently. The seller notes the truck is mostly original, with only a repaint mentioned, and that it looks aesthetically pleasing. @OctaneOutlaw appreciates the rare color, and @etbrace emphasizes the excellent repaint quality and functionality of the AC, along with new tires and brakes, suggesting it's a joy to drive and a great investment. Buyers can also expect an easy transaction process with complete paperwork and shipping assistance.
Neutral: Several commenters ask for clarification regarding the truck's features and condition. @Wingnut30 inquires about the spare tire, and @robthecob and @billsgarage confirm the truck's configuration is 2WD, with @etbrace providing timely responses about the truck's specifications. There are questions about the grill and side marker light replacements, with @PatinaBeforePolish seeking details about that change, and @etbrace offering to provide original parts if desired by the winning bidder. The truck's audio system is also mentioned by @ianot, to which the seller elaborates on its extensive features, hinting the truck is equipped with modern technology.
Negative: Some comments bring up minor concerns or observations that could be potential downsides for buyers. @HarleyFXDL notes the missing center caps could detract from the truck's appearance, and @Wingnut30 suggests reverting to original tail lights, which indicates a desire for authenticity. @PatinaBeforePolish raises a question about why certain components were replaced, reflecting a need for transparency regarding modifications. While these comments do not label the truck as unsatisfactory, they highlight areas that could warrant further attention or adjustment from the seller.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @WAGONBOYTD commended the vehicle's tasteful build, appreciating the color combination and noting that it's easy to add or change features such as air conditioning and the suspension. @cll2 was impressed by the restoration work that included a body-off repaint, engine updates, and interior work for a reasonable cost. @motorcarstudio (The Seller) highlighted that this D110 runs well, has a rust-free chassis from its time in Spain, and comes with a clean Florida title, indicating high-quality restoration documented by numerous photos and the original service book.
Neutral: @Maxm3power inquired about the paint type used, while @bobbies requested a video tour of the vehicle's interior and a cold start. @dungeoncrawl sought confirmation on the VIN matching for the body and engine, and was curious about the vehicle's height. @WAGONBOYTD noted the engine block number as being appropriate for a Defender 200 Tdi. @motorcarstudio provided details regarding the engine and reassured potential buyers about the vehicle's reliability and history.
Negative: @jacktrades771 expressed concern over the different paint jobs for the doors compared to the body, questioning the visibility of the color difference in real life. This commenter also doubted the feasibility of performing a similar restoration in the U.S. for the same price. @dungeoncrawl mentioned a lack of extensive discussion regarding potential issues with the vehicle, aside from the paint variance, indicating uncertainty among prospective buyers about what else may be wrong.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @littlehandegan mentioned that the G55 has low mileage and characterized it as the "best of the best." @Seena noted that the vehicle looks "badass," while @Beetagh praised it for looking very clean and well kept. @mccormick009 described it as a "gem" and @AlecTrevelyan highlighted the OEM+ look of the G63 wheels and BFG tires, pointing out the immaculate Designo front seats. @Candersoh also found it beautiful and praised its aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: @mg267 inquired about the size of the tires, which @TheAutoPaddock clarified as BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2's in 285/55/R20. @anthonyjp asked about the stock exhaust, to which @TheAutoPaddock confirmed that it would be included in the sale. Questions about the rear tire cover's compatibility with the current tire setup came from @N24, and @NOLABJC asked if the vehicle had been lifted or if any rubbing issues were present, which was addressed by the seller stating there are no issues. Furthermore, @GTank requested closeup photos of common rust points, which the seller assured had no rust present.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's functionality included @sjhowitson's inquiry about the servicing of the locking diffs and their operational status. @littlehandegan raised doubts about the parking sensors, questioning their effectiveness after the possible retrofit. @TheAutoPaddock confirmed that the front sensors were not working, creating some apprehension about the modifications made to the vehicle. All these inquiries reflected a cautious approach among potential buyers regarding the truck's maintenance and modifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @NJPI1963 describes the vehicle as "Beyond Awesome!" and @Areonetee acknowledges that no expense was spared in the build, suggesting that it is a well-crafted car. @CHARLES66_ (The Seller) emphasizes comfort and easy entry for taller individuals, stating that the current owner, who is 6'4", fits comfortably with the vehicle's design. Overall, several commenters express their admiration, claiming it to be a 'masterpiece' and a 'work of art,' highlighting the vehicle's classy appearance and exceptional driving experience.
Neutral: Comments from @SimpleMinded and others highlight practical considerations for taller drivers, including requests for specific images to assess fitment. @streetrodsda queries about potential smog test requirements due to the vehicle's assembly status, indicating that this information is essential for serious buyers. @mikereockwell reflects on personal preferences for car builds, and @CHARLES66_ (The Seller) reassures that the car has been kept in excellent condition, stored indoors in a climate-controlled environment.
Negative: Some commenters express doubts about fitment and usability, like @Areonetee pointing out visibility issues for taller drivers and @czmx questioning why someone would rev a cold engine. Additionally, @Fatlips mentions that building a similar car would cost significantly more, although they note that it is still a nice ride overall. @flatop raises concerns regarding registration in California, indicating potential bureaucratic hurdles for buyers in that state.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @CRUSH believes the vehicle is a standout piece that could set records and prefers it over newer models. @mynameistimo describes it as magnificent, while @watergate528 expresses approval, wishing it were a Club Cab. @RWB_AZ feels that the single cab, 8ft bed, and diesel configuration make it an excellent choice, and @1996MBZ has a favorable opinion, associating it with a friend. Furthermore, @packman21 appreciates the beauty of the truck, especially the steelie wheels with meaty tires, and @peterBDM categorizes it as 'like new'.
Neutral: Several commentors discuss specific details about the truck's engine block, particularly its classification as a '53 block'. @TGwjacod-akota raises a question about the presence of the killer dowel pin and its confirmation. @BoschJohn and @9DodgeFan engage in a discussion about engine horsepower specifications from that model year. @RetroRidez, the seller, provides clarification on engine identification and confirms the absence of specific casting numbers, thus ruling out the '53 block.' Additionally, there are inquiries about the truck's repair history and leaks, with @packman21 suggesting a blow-by test and driving video for further verification.
Negative: Some concerns about the vehicle surfaced, particularly regarding the '53 block' potential issues. @9DodgeFan reassures that the dowel pin should not be a problem in this truck due to design revisions. @packman21's inquiries about repainting and any potential leaks indicate worries regarding the truck's condition, as the seller mentioned repainting was done to remove old fire department decals, and thus, there are no maintenance records from the previous owner. @RetroRidez also notes that the original suspension components remain, which may concern some buyers seeking refurbished parts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Zacwigs (The Seller) describes the vehicle as having a clean body, solid undercarriage, and minimal rust, having primarily been used as a second vehicle in Iowa with limited exposure to harsh winter conditions. He mentions routine maintenance like oil changes, a recent battery replacement, and the fact that the vehicle runs flawlessly. Others such as @RED2DELTA and @Archer84 express their positive impressions of the vehicle, highlighting its potential and pleasant surprises considering its age and previous use.
Neutral: The discussion involves questions about the timing belt and transmission, which are common concerns with vehicles of this age. @Steadfastacres and @WIZZZZ inquire about the timing belt change, while others like @PKBAYRIDGE clarify the transmission operation during flat towing, suggesting that proper protocols can mitigate potential issues. @wood1565 brings up engine sounds and the temperature gauge but notes that the vehicle is a non-interference engine, indicating that a failure would not cause catastrophic damage.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle include whether the transmission may have issues related to flat towing, a point raised by @M3rryChristmas and supported by @carstruck, who suggests elevated towing for 4WD vehicles. There are questions about an unusual high-pitched sound from the engine noted by @DominicLouisD, and @M3rryChristmas mentions the risks associated with the vehicle's transmission if not towed correctly. The CD player and driver's seat damage noted by @Zacwigs (The Seller) also indicate potential drawbacks of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its well-maintained condition and numerous features. @TJZANATTA, the seller, emphasizes that the 2013 Rubicon has been carefully looked after, presenting a comprehensive list of included extras such as the hard top, soft top, suspension modifications, and various off-road enhancements. @Andydexterous shows appreciation for the vehicle's quality, requesting videos for further assurance, while @Capt_Nemo expresses optimism for the auction outcome, believing the Jeep will bring happiness to the new owner.
Neutral: Several inquiries focused on specific aspects of the vehicle's condition and features. @Elroy0451 asked about potential undercarriage issues, particularly the skid plate's rust, while @ANAfoundry sought clarification on the off-road functionalities, such as the sway bar and axle operations. @mrw1 requested additional images of the frame from both sides to assess its integrity. @TJZANATTA provided detailed responses, reassuring that everything functions appropriately and that maintenance hasn't been neglected.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the condition of specific vehicle parts, particularly the rust on the skid plate. Commenters like @Elroy0451 and @Andydexterous expressed a desire for further clarification about whether the rust might require extensive repairs. Although @TJZANATTA addressed these concerns by explaining that the rust is on a non-structural part and can be easily replaced, the initial inquiries demonstrate some level of apprehension among potential buyers about the vehicle's overall condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the overall appearance and condition of the Bronco. @Bigenca noted it as an 'uncut beauty' likely to appreciate in value, while @Middler89 and @Johnnycab complimented the stunning color and aesthetic details. @Todd_Z remarked on its cleanliness and design, echoing sentiments about the quality of the build with comments like 'this one is really nice looking and clean underneath.' Additionally, @Emelton24 highlighted the impressive interior and color scheme, praising @Betty74 for consistently sourcing high-quality Broncos, suggesting high expectations for the next owner of this vehicle.
Neutral: Several inquiries about specific features and history were made, especially concerning mechanical aspects and authenticity. @Rjw3 questioned the AC's installation details, while @Mitch55 and others asked for videos demonstrating the vehicle in action. @Ranchero65 brought up potential discrepancies in dealer history, showing interest in its background. @highgeer was curious about the suspension specifics and mirror origins, indicating an engaged audience seeking deeper knowledge which @Betty74 engaged with thoroughly, providing insights into the Bronco’s specifications and condition without asserting superiority.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about minor aspects of the Bronco’s condition and features. Comments from @Rjw3 hinted at potential issues with the roof liner, while @solidlifters and @Danny53 sought clarity on the originality of the interior, expressing caution and skepticism about the vehicle’s restoration status. @Bronco4x4ever advised a critical adjustment to the spare tire cable for the preservation of the tailgate, indicating that not all comments were strictly positive. Some commenters seemed wary of historical details or modifications, suggesting a level of scrutiny regarding the authenticity of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and unique story. @280SEL calls it a 'classic class beauty', while @Scarlet65 appreciates its nice appearance. @SlowNRusty also expresses enthusiasm, noting the car is nicely modified and a joy to drive. Another commenter, @BMW23, admires the beauty of the car and its backstory, and @901Loser echoes this sentiment. The seller, @Bjacobs2007, shares emotional connections to the vehicle, emphasizing the care it received and its powerful performance. Many commenters convey their excitement for the auction, hoping it receives a worthy bid.
Neutral: Several comments seek clarifications or provide additional insights about the car. @Tarekgs expresses interest in the auction outcome without any explicit opinions on the vehicle itself. @MrDantastic raises questions about the window seals and emissions standards, while @Vandabs offers suggestions for potential window repairs. The seller, @Bjacobs2007, responds to these queries with detailed information about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history, indicating transparency and engagement with potential buyers. This dialogue reflects an active discussion about the car's specific features and quirks, creating an informative environment around the auction.
Negative: A few comments touch on aspects that may raise concerns for potential buyers. @MrDantastic questions whether the car meets California exhaust standards, highlighting past issues with a previous purchase. Another commenter, @kronus, mentions that while the car has a catalytic converter, its modifications may not comply with California regulations, which could be problematic for buyers in that state. Furthermore, @Bjacobs2007 acknowledges issues with the window operations and the age-related characteristics of the seals, showing that there are minor issues that need addressing, which could be seen as drawbacks for some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @BaltimoreBill expressed enthusiasm about the mileage, emphasizing the importance of driving these cars like they were intended in the late 50s. @Rocketman612 complimented the interior refresh, highlighting the appealing color combination and seat style, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @jplowman (The Seller) responded positively to questions, showing openness to provide additional information and engaging with potential buyers, which gives a good impression of responsiveness regarding the vehicle.
Neutral: @Driver82 inquired about the car's production age and mentioned that the paperwork references 2003, showing concern about the engine's performance compared to newer models. @jplowman (The Seller) clarified that the car was built in the early 2000s and detailed the specifications of its 1.6L VW engine. Other questions ranged from concerns about registration in California, with @Vicnice69 asking for clarification on the state of the title and registration process, to various inquiries about the vehicle's structural integrity and features, as indicated by @jbspeed and @Rxt485.
Negative: There were concerns about the vehicle's condition, with @jbspeed requesting clarity on the floor pan repairs and any potential rust issues, expressing a need for more detailed documentation. Additionally, @Seahurts903 raised a question about the braking system, suggesting some uncertainty about whether the car had been updated to include four-wheel disc brakes or retained its original components. Overall, potential buyers seem cautious and are seeking thorough confirmation of the vehicle's specifications and condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its appeal, with users expressing admiration for its specifications and condition. @NVGT350 mentioned owning a similar model and wished the seller luck with the auction. @gb70 appreciated that the car had been driven and enjoyed, and @anthonyjp complimented it for having the right color spec and upgrades. The seller, @Shelly240, shared extensive details about the vehicle's condition, including its near-perfect exterior due to a protective wrap and the new car smell intact. Other commenters acknowledged the advantages of the updated drivetrain, with @b.flippo emphasizing that the replacement motor was a good thing, and @Vtec4ever hoped it would last for years. Furthermore, there's a sense of camaraderie among enthusiasts, as seen in @Fineride's encouragement towards a fellow racer purchasing this well-sorted vehicle.
Neutral: The comments also reflect curiosity and requests for more information regarding the vehicle's modifications and history. @vegastoburque inquired about the engine, transmission, and differential warranty replacements, demonstrating an active interest in the mechanical details. @mlorish requested close-up pictures of curb rash on the wheels, indicating a common concern for aesthetic condition. Questions regarding the track history and usage of the vehicle arose, with @htron435 and @Blesseuer asking about track miles and the wear on tires and brakes. The seller was proactive in providing updates and addressing these queries, reinforcing transparency about the car's usage and maintenance schedule, including the confirmation of 26 track days.
Negative: Concerns also arose regarding the vehicle's service history and potential undisclosed issues. @ukiuleledick pointed out that drivetrain work was not reflected in the Car Fax report, and @Dbergamy questioned the reasons behind the engine's replacement. @Alaskastang commented on the total drivetrain replacement, suggesting it may have been a significant maintenance concern. Additionally, @expressbrandon noted that certain panel gaps appeared off, prompting speculation about possible collisions or bodywork, to which @vegastoburque defended the car's typical manufacturing standards. Finally, the seller faced challenges obtaining documentation for the work done, indicating some frustration that highlighted the importance of thorough record-keeping in used car transactions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments regarding the vehicle highlight its impressive performance and allure, with users like @echo002 praising its mileage on the powerful V12 engine, and @ntbd4 noting its near supercar performance at a fraction of typical costs. Others, such as @slickshift and @Beetagh, reminisce about the exhilarating experience of driving the SL65, with descriptions like 'an absolute beast' that echoes the admiration for its strong torque. @Hulk2000 also shares positive experiences about the longevity and reliability of these engines, suggesting that with the right care, owners can truly enjoy the car.
Neutral: Several users raised questions regarding specific features and service history, such as @CoachTakaTino, who inquired about the availability of technologies like Parktronic and Distronic, while @Dom_Cobb pointed out the lack of AirScarf in the model year. Others like @Dom_Cobb and @Rock26 expressed concerns about the maintenance records and suggested checking on the condition of several critical components given the mileage. @4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) addressed many of these inquiries directly, providing details on maintenance done and assuring that the transmission remains reliable, reflecting typical seller transparency.
Negative: On the downside, some comments from users like @zachmac raised concerns over the perceived lack of certain features, such as the absence of Distronic, and suggested that although the SL65 might be in good condition, it's wise to anticipate necessary replacements as the car ages. @Rock26 specifically cautioned about possible transmission rebuilding at such mileage. Overall, while many were excited about the car, there was acknowledgment of potential issues that could arise with an older high-performance vehicle, including routine maintenance and repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @johnnyvett mentioned that the 1970 Corvette looks great, indicating satisfaction with the restoration quality of the vehicle while wishing good luck to the seller. @JimmoVette expressed similar sentiments, acknowledging the car's aesthetics but stating preferences for other color combinations. @sweetcars, the seller, highlighted features and transparency in the sale process, urging interested parties to come for a viewing and expressing enthusiasm about the vehicle's condition and driving capabilities, stating it would make a fun car for new owners.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed technical aspects and asked questions about the vehicle. @FSH inquired about the placement of the spare tire beneath the car, while @VZEWolff and @Kkoester sought clarification on engine specifications and potential mismatches in the car's history. Others noted lighting effects on the car's color in photos, with @Noisyboyz and @sir_keith commenting on discrepancies between the perceived color in images versus natural light. @Doug78 raised concerns about possible leaks and the need for a driving video, prompting @sweetcars to address these points and provide reassurance about the vehicle's functionality and ongoing maintenance.
Negative: @ronsant expressed disappointment regarding overlooked minor mechanical issues like an engine oil leak and found it surprising that these were not corrected during the restoration. @C3Lee critiqued the lack of clarity regarding the engine's specifications and raised concerns over the safety of exposing the car to salty roads for driving footage, fearing damage to the vehicle's underside. @johnnyvett pointed out imperfections in the car's restoration details that contradicted its intention for a showroom appearance, further emphasizing the potential hindrances to the vehicle's value. Overall, some commenters indicated that several small unfinished details could negatively impact the car's market appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @VantageAuto (The Seller) mentions that the 2008 GMC Yukon XL SLT 4x4 is an ultra low mileage truck that has been exceptionally well cared for by its single owner. The vehicle's fantastic exterior and interior conditions are highlighted, showcasing its impressive features like DVD, navigation, sunroof, and air suspension. The Seller is confident that this Yukon is one of the best examples available, characterized as comfortable, reliable, and capable, with a long life ahead. Additionally, the interior has never been smoked in, further emphasizing its pristine quality. The truck is presented as a rare find for collectors or buyers seeking a dependable vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the vehicle's specifications and details, including a correction about its transmission, with @DaveyHD and @RemoteConnection clarifying that it is a 4-speed transmission instead of a 6-speed. @VantageAuto (The Seller) reassures potential buyers about the vehicle's maintenance, indicating that the air suspension compressor will be replaced before the sale and was refinished a few years ago without any parts being replaced. There are inquiries regarding active fuel management, rust concerns, and the vehicle's overall maintenance that reflect a mixture of curiosity and diligence from potential bidders.
Negative: On the downside, some concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's age, particularly mentioning that the tires are from 2015, leading @tynij and @DrJacquesStrappe to question their safety and whether bidders should factor in the cost of new tires. @Stugats2 notes potential rust around the hood latch and asks if any fluid maintenance is needed, reflecting skepticism about the vehicle's long-term condition. Additionally, there is some uncertainty regarding previous minor accidents and whether they might affect the vehicle's integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mgav praised the car's appearance, recalling their own positive experience with a 2011 model that they found a pleasure to drive. @ripper996 also offered a compliment, recognizing the owner's effort in driving the car. Additionally, @JGrills admired both the color and condition of the vehicle, expressing interest in the sunroof liner's state and the maintenance history of the transmission.
Neutral: @4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) provided responses to various inquiries, including confirming that the car comes with two keys, addressing @JGrills' questions about the sunroof's adhesive, and clarifying the vehicle's service history. They mentioned that the water pump and tensioners were done but hadn't personally serviced the transmission. The Seller also acknowledged the question about the belly pan's condition, assuring that there are no active oil leaks.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @fearless67 regarding the timing chain and maintenance history, prompting discussions about the vehicle's technical aspects. @JORA_Imports questioned the credibility of commenters who repeatedly ask similar questions without bidding, while @FW_BRONC asked about potential odors inside the car. @2001lightning noted a possible confusion regarding the rear A/C ventilation, which was clarified by @fraserleague, indicating the vehicle's lack of rear heat/AC controls.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @C_Level expressed excitement about the vehicle, stating that they own a similar model and believe the potential buyer will love it. They mentioned that if the sale goes well, they might consider posting their own vehicle for sale. This indicates a positive sentiment about the vehicle's appeal and quality.
Neutral: @4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) confirmed that the sunroof works and there is no smoke smell in the vehicle. They also indicated that they would be posting videos shortly after some delays, which suggests a willingness to provide information about the vehicle to potential buyers. @alshafi asked about the functionality of the electronics, requesting specific features like the sunroof and a cold start video, indicating interest in the vehicle's condition without expressing emotion towards it.
Negative: @gav24 inquired about a metallic rattle noted during the cold start video, which raises concerns about potential issues with the vehicle's performance. This comment indicates a possible flaw in the car that potential buyers might need to address. Additionally, @alshafi mentioned wanting specific feedback about the vehicle's electronics, suggesting there might be uncertainty regarding their reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @cmparkhurst praises the vehicle as a lovely example of its model, while @BrandonC21 expresses envy for the seller's collection of 323ti's, commenting that it is another gorgeous offering from @AutobahnA3. @Richard_Slap appreciates the aggressive 4.10 final drive ratio, noting its fun driving experience, and remarking on the vehicle's fantastic color and maintenance. @JGraham highlights the rarity of this specific 323ti with its unique color and 2.5L engine, asserting it’s a special find and a great driving machine. Overall, many commenters admire the vehicle's aesthetics, its rarity, and the excitement around its performance attributes.
Neutral: @Caymanorcarrera raises a question about whether the car would need modifications to comply with California emissions regulations, indicating uncertainty about the registration process. @RatherJaded requests paint gauge readings from the seller, while @maw06 inquires about the complexities of registering a direct import from Germany, seeking guidance on necessary documentation. The sellers, @AutobahnA3, respond to many queries including the title transfer process and emissions challenges specifically for California, aiming to clarify the overall experience of purchasing and registering this vehicle in the US. Other comments reflect a mix of curiosity about technical aspects like the transmission and performance metrics.
Negative: @clenkeit expresses concern that even if the vehicle passes smog tests, registering it in California could become a costly and time-consuming process, suggesting frustration with the state's regulations on foreign imports. @jpr mentions their admiration for the model but hints at limited availability in the market, reflecting on past struggles for appreciation. @Bubbasev comments on perceived noise issues while shifting during a drive video, questioning the vehicle's performance quality. Additionally, @Centipede asks if there are any unpleasant odors in the interior, pointing to health and comfort concerns with used vehicles.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @zdoctor highlighted the car's appeal as a 'perfect car to drive and enjoy,' emphasizing its low mileage and clean condition, making it a great option for collectors and enthusiasts alike. @Dfresh713 remarked on the rarity of the Anniversary Edition, considering it one of the ultimate cars of the Radwood era, pointing to its preserved details as a sign of quality. @drivemelucky (The Seller) also touted the vehicle's strong driving capabilities and solid condition, encouraging potential bidders to 'bid with confidence.'
Neutral: Several comments discussed the vehicle's features and potential maintenance needs. @squarefish raised questions about the functionality of various interior electronics, including the AC and heat systems. @drivemelucky (The Seller) responded positively, confirming that the AC blows cool, though not ice cold, and the heat works fine. The seller assured buyers that maintenance records are available, and that basic services have been completed, but recommended additional official maintenance for long-term reliability.
Negative: Comments also included concerns regarding the vehicle's age and potential hidden issues. @zdoctor advised future buyers to be prepared for a thorough service, including timing belt and water pump replacement, highlighting common maintenance issues for older cars. @smk21170 expressed skepticism about the accuracy of the mileage and distance features based on video evidence presented. Overall, while there's admiration for the car's aesthetics and history, there are cautionary notes about ensuring that all functions are operational before making a bid.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the aesthetic appeal and overall reliability of the vehicle. @anniefogie expresses admiration for the car's appearance, while @LHarbourmaster is inspired to sell his own Honda Odyssey to embrace a wagon lifestyle. @RockRowe mentions positive experiences with his own front-wheel drive (fwd) variant, appreciating its performance in extreme weather conditions. @Sjulier reflects on the comfort and suitability of the P2 wagons for long distance travel, adding to the general consensus that these cars provide excellent comfort and utility.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the features and maintenance aspects of the vehicle. @Old_Ned notes the presence of Volvo’s stability traction control system, which is commendable for icy conditions but lacks the off-road capability of the all-wheel drive (AWD) variant. @zzzzzzz appreciates the car's cleanliness and longevity, while @burmajones raises a question about the timing belt maintenance, pointing to a previous entry that raises some hope but lacks definitive documentation. 4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) actively engages with potential buyers, providing responses to maintenance inquiries and expressing intentions to upload videos of the vehicle.
Negative: Some commentators raised concerns about certain features and potential drawbacks. @anniefogie wishes for AWD capabilities, and @t5ing mentions that the vehicle might exhibit signs of oil leaks. There is also caution regarding the lack of the "Cold Weather Package" as pointed out by @Old_Ned, which could detract from the car's appeal in colder climates. Additionally, @ppch628 points out a common issue with the turn signal stalk that they have encountered, hinting at possible shortcomings in the model's engineering.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle, praising its clean and appealing aesthetics. @vic, the seller, highlighted the car as a 'beautiful 318i Touring' that runs perfectly, emphasizing its rust-free condition. Enthusiasts like @e30343990 noted @vic's impressive collection of E30 Tourings, while @e9er admired it as a beautiful, clean blank slate to work with. @Burnt_squirrel appreciated its sturdy design and unique appeal in the US market, and several users echoed sentiments of nostalgia and admiration for the E30 models, underscoring their popularity and timeless charm.
Neutral: In the discussion, several commenters asked practical questions, mostly regarding the car’s features. @jonnyslasher inquired about potential rust areas, which @vic quickly clarified by providing detailed reassurances and additional photographs. @Bentley964 questioned the absence of AC in the model, while @thosmc sought information on the availability of maintenance and repair parts for this euro model. @GV1390 also raised several queries about maintenance records and tire conditions, which @vic addressed thoroughly, reinforcing transparency and encouraging further interactions.
Negative: On the flip side, some commenters expressed regret or disappointment. @mekdigital mentioned a past regret about not purchasing an E30 Touring, suggesting an emotional connection to the model that many feel about classic cars. @Mangler brought up the challenges of retrofitting the vehicle with AC, questioning the feasibility of such modifications. Additionally, @GV1390 pointed out potential concerns with the yellow coating in the engine bay and asked specific questions about the vehicle's condition and reserve price, which suggests a cautious approach among some buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its nice appearance and refurbishment. @JacquesMerde praised the truck as 'very nice' and @boaboyoz described it as a 'handsome example' with a cheerful comment wishing good luck to the seller. @bosshoss3406pack echoed these sentiments, stating that it is a 'Great Truck' guaranteed to bring joy. Other users like @hairyolds and @PDXBryan complimented the truck's color combination and general aesthetics, contributing to a positive perception of the vehicle's appeal and craftsmanship.
Neutral: The seller, @F1Hundred, provided extensive details about the truck's history and refurbishment process, mentioning the various upgrades made, including the engine and interior work. They acknowledged the truck's origin from California and the care taken by their father in maintaining it, addressing queries from potential buyers. Additionally, the seller indicated that they would provide more pictures and updates, maintaining open communication and excitement about the truck's features and restoration.
Negative: Concerns were raised by at least one user regarding the truck's odometer, with @Metalbycharlie suggesting that it may have rolled over, although the seller maintained that the refurbishment had been thorough. While this comment was flagged as non-constructive, it nonetheless presents a slight apprehension about the vehicle's history. Overall, negativity in the comments was minimal, as most focused on the positive aspects of the truck rather than pointing out flaws.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the Aqua Blue Metallic Camaro, highlighting its rarity and the appeal of the color. @pmartin75 (The Seller) mentions that the car has been in their family since new and has low mileage, which adds to its desirability. Enthusiasts like @JayKay2430 and @Budlow77 affirm its uniqueness, noting the small production numbers and appreciating the modifications made to the vehicle. The overall consensus is that the car is a clean example of a rare model, especially when maintained in such good condition.
Neutral: @pmartin75 (The Seller) provides detailed answers to inquiries about the car's condition and history. They clarify the nature of previous repairs and offer service records, as well as transparency about the paint condition under various lighting. Various discussions center around the suspension options of the car as @gstepp22 sought clarification about potential value-added features, which @MS3DALE and @pmartin75 clarified regarding the standard performance suspension for this model year.
Negative: Some comments raise questions regarding the car’s previous repairs. @Wpieroni and @Philaprea inquire about the specifics of the reported front suspension damage and whether any exterior damage was evident before repairs. While @pmartin75 reassures that all work was performed without issues regarding body or frame damage, concerns persist about the nature of the incident and potential buyer hesitations regarding the repair history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Porschgeezer noted that the vehicle appears to be one of the nicest 928s available and seems well cared for. @BCCanada expressed excitement about the car being stock and having all the right features. @NCStephen referred to the car as a 'time capsule' with minimal maintenance issues, describing it positively despite periods of inactivity. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, provides a thorough examination of the car, highlighting its stunning condition, original features, and recent maintenance, confirming it's a great example of the model with plenty of power and unique styling.
Neutral: Commenters posed questions and engaged in discussions about the vehicle's features and specifications. @ynot1967 inquired about the odometer's accuracy, while @Verdigris asked about specific button functionalities within the car. @SlowNRusty and @Manywheels59 mentioned the vehicle's price and color, with some reminiscing about their experiences with similar models. The dialogue continued as other users contributed insights and clarifications on the car's components and maintenance, highlighting the community's interest in the car's condition and history.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive remarks, some commenters expressed concerns. @vansters pointed out the use of a K&N filter, suggesting it wasn't the best choice for the vehicle. @Cmdr430 raised questions about the accuracy of the window sticker, while @Kstadt911 focused on potential paint condition issues. Additionally, @ibsears cautioned that the timing belt may need regular replacement due to the car's interference engine, although other users like @Teutonic and @vansters debated the necessity of such frequent changes, indicating concerns over mechanic misconceptions rather than the vehicle's true reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @nexusautobrokers describes the Slingshot as 'wicked fun' and other users like @RiffRaff highlight its popularity and impressive performance with 170 hp. @JAY-Z appreciates the blend of features and tech in a compact design, comparing it to something an aspiring Batman would own. @Manywheels59 and @RedAvanti also mention the fun factor, with one recalling a demo ride and the other emphasizing its enjoyable driving experience.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) provides detailed information about the auction, affirming its commitment to smooth transactions and high customer satisfaction with a 4.9/5.0 Google rating. They clarify the mileage confusion for prospective buyers, establishing trust by confirming the vehicle has 314 original miles, although some comments question the odometer readings. Additionally, they answer inquiries regarding warranties and vehicle coverage, demonstrating transparency in their processes.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the vehicle's maintenance after prolonged storage, with @Missesfluff questioning the condition of gas and spark plugs. There are also comments about the licensing requirements to operate the Slingshot, particularly in different states such as California, as noted by @60Bird. Furthermore, @earlebird and @badboy4fun_wa mention discrepancies in the mileage reading during a video, suggesting a lack of clarity that could dissuade potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the 2006 Chevrolet SSR, highlighting its unique features and collector-grade quality. @BudHorse praised the truck's appealing color and manual transmission, referring to the Pacific Blue as a limited-run color that adds value. @Picky1 found it to be the ideal truck, thanks to its 6-liter engine paired with a 6-speed manual transmission. Many commenters, including @Trifiveron, noted its potential as a show car, emphasizing its clean condition and wonderful aesthetics, particularly the stunning color.
Neutral: The seller, @collectibleclassics, provided detailed answers to common questions about the truck's condition, stating that it runs flawlessly but lacks certain paperwork from its previous owner. @JTBogus and @Misterfudge raised inquiries about the tires' date codes, any modifications made to the vehicle, and the nature of the stripes—whether they are painted or vinyl. The seller confirmed that the truck had been tuned but lacked complete information on previous modifications, highlighting that some details may be missing due to the prior owner's memory lapses.
Negative: Concerns were voiced regarding specific aspects of the vehicle's condition. @rdw95 mentioned the potential risks of retaining the original 2005/2006 date tires, warning about the dangers they pose. Additionally, @Rpl1 questioned the clarity of the imperfection video, seeking more information on certain blemishes noted by the seller. @TPH56 expressed dissatisfaction with the absence of running boards, which had been a topic of discussion among bidders, indicating a lack of clarity on whether they would be included in the sale.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics emphasizes their commitment to smooth and transparent transactions, showcasing a strong reputation with a high rating of 4.9/5.0 based on numerous 5-star reviews, which boosts confidence among potential buyers. The dealership highlights their readiness to provide inspections by trusted local shops and their systematic approach to inventory sourced from private sellers, demonstrating a level of professionalism in the vehicle marketplace. Additionally, @Southbeachmale shares a positive personal experience, having bought a Bentley from the dealership, which further affirms their credibility.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics addresses inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition, specifically the dash and steering wheel buttons. They acknowledge that while the dash looks very nice with no shrinkage observed, the soft-touch material around the ignition exhibits some wear, a common issue for such vehicles. Furthermore, sticky buttons are acknowledged as expected over time, and they provide insight into attempts made for remediation, allowing potential buyers to judge the condition accurately.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects outlined, there are concerns from users such as @autouch and @Msweetnam regarding the condition of the dash and controls, with @Msweetnam particularly highlighting the issue of sticky buttons. @Collectibleclassics admits that while they have cleaned the high-touch surfaces, the results are not perfect and that DIY solutions are often necessary for achieving better results. The concerns from potential buyers indicate that while the vehicle is indeed low mileage and well-maintained, there are cosmetic issues that could deter some buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its stunning aesthetics and desirable specifications. @jvan20p noted it as a 'beautiful example' and @borninthe60s highlighted its superior color and manual transmission. The car has garnered favorable comparisons to other models, with @DennisBrant stating it might be the best color combo available and expressing a willingness to trade his own soft top version for it. @Chuck121370 also showed interest, acknowledging the condition and presentation of the vehicle. Several users, including @gardnpc and @oklahomie, shared their personal positive experiences with similar models, emphasizing the joy of owning a Mazda MX-5 Miata.
Neutral: Comments also discussed the mechanics and overall condition of the vehicle. @Chuck121370 asked for details about the rear-end CarFax repair, showing potential buyers' interests in understanding the car's history. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) responded with reassurances, indicating that while there was minor reported damage, the vehicle was well-maintained and ready for sale. @adeep42 inquired about headroom in the vehicle, indicating consideration from taller individuals, while @SDCR confirmed the ample interior space of these cars, pointing out adjustable features that enhance comfort.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, there were notable expressions of skepticism from some users. @TonyAlmonte criticized individuals who speculate on vehicle pricing without any vested interest, hinting at potential conflicts in the discussions. Additionally, @Buddha240 and @exbikeracer indicated playful competition among bidders, suggesting that there could be challenges regarding the bidding process. There were also questions about the reliability of retractable hardtops, with @squareD expressing caution regarding their history, although @bhhumphrey and others reassured the durability of Mazda's design compared to European alternatives.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's exceptional condition and nostalgic value. @TracksuitAL fondly recalls driving a Stealth RT Turbo in the 1990s, emphasizing its memorable experience. @NoHarmLookin appreciates how the car meets its design sketches, praising its combination of performance features including Turbo and AWD. @Dodge_guy describes it as a beautiful example that garners a lot of attention at car shows, signifying its timeless appeal. @TNVolunteer even expresses a longing to have it back, stating it as one of the most amazing cars he has ever owned, reinforcing the car's positive legacy among past drivers.
Neutral: The seller, @Collectibleclassics, provides detailed information about the auction process and logistics options available, showing transparency with potential buyers. They mention consistent paint quality and maintenance records, indicating the vehicle has been well cared for over the years. Several commentors inquire about specific vehicle aspects, such as @LuapR asking about previous owners and @Alexion questioning the timing belt history. @cuzzinolaf shares personal history with the car, mentioning previous ownership, which adds context to the vehicle's journey.
Negative: Concerns are raised about minor issues with the vehicle. @Brobrah and @camarokidrsss both question why the Stealth is missing its rear emblem, highlighting a detail that may concern prospective buyers. @jlp14 points out specific damages like a cracked air vent and a broken shifter boot, along with the potential need for repairs on the driver's seat. Although @Collectibleclassics addresses these issues and assures transparency, the risks associated with owning a 30-year-old vehicle remain prevalent in the discussions, with @2thMnky and others expressing the challenges of performing needed repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the 2003 Porsche Boxster S for its aesthetics and driving experience. @GWAuto described it as the most pristine Boxster he had ever seen, while @mbelliss1 shared a positive sentiment about the car's driving dynamics and serviceability, noting that it offers enduring enjoyment alongside high-performance vehicles. @Lilptr added a personal touch, recalling a fun road trip in a similar model and highlighting the standout wheels of this vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments posed questions or sought clarifications regarding the Boxster S, particularly about the IMS (Intermediate Shaft) and the vehicle's headlights. @Lfconte inquired about the IMS, reflecting a common area of concern for potential buyers. @GTIVR6Jim and @RChoudry both asked about the specifications of the wheels and the headlights, showcasing interest from the audience but without strong positive or negative sentiments attached. The seller addressed these inquiries and offered transparency about the vehicle's service history and modifications.
Negative: Concerns surfaced around ownership history and potential issues with the headlights. @JB423 pointed out that having eight previous owners might suggest some reservations for buyers. Additionally, @scbarr mentioned that stock headlights tend to wear out around the car's mileage, suggesting a common issue faced by similar models. There was also speculation regarding the aftermarket headlights that could indicate a possible accident, as noted by the seller, although he maintained that he believed the swap was likely for aesthetic reasons. The response did not entirely alleviate worries from potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @PricklyPearAutoClub calls the car "super cool," conveying strong excitement about the vehicle. @Rbrey381 also expresses enthusiasm, referring to it as a "nice automobile" and wishing good luck, while celebrating his positive experiences with both the 4.6L and Coyote-powered Mustangs. @RFortuna describes the car as "beautiful," which adds to the overall positive sentiment surrounding the vehicle.
Neutral: @Edmonds appreciates the seller's transparency by recognizing the imperfections video, suggesting that revealing flaws can build trust with potential buyers. @MSP_MC provides a factual detail about the tires, explaining that the car was built 11 months after the tires were made, which places the tires' age in a context that may not be unusual for a used vehicle. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) addresses concerns about the tires and confirms the offer to install new ones at wholesale cost, indicating a willingness to accommodate buyer preferences.
Negative: @Calstickshift points out that original 2010 Mustang owners may regret not waiting for subsequent models, implying a dissatisfaction with Ford's decision to improve engines shortly after the car's release. While @RFortuna raises a question about the tires being older than the car, suggesting a discrepancy that might concern potential buyers, the seller's response acknowledges the oddity without providing a substantial explanation. This situation hints at potential worry regarding the vehicle's condition and maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ExclusiveAutoBrokers expresses genuine enthusiasm for presenting this vehicle to potential buyers, emphasizing a commitment to transparency and customer engagement. They show appreciation towards the community for their interest and questions, aiming to create a satisfying experience for bidders. Commenters like @nexusautobrokers also share positive views about the specifications of the vehicle, highlighting its appeal.
Neutral: @ABTGuy seeks clarification on whether the instrument cluster can be converted to display kilometers instead of miles per hour, suggesting the possibility of the vehicle being used in Canada. @ExclusiveAutoBrokers confirms that the entire dash can be converted, indicating their willingness to accommodate buyer needs and provide additional information. This exchange shows an active and responsive dialog between the seller and interested parties.
Negative: @beau17 raises concerns about the vehicle's history with overheating issues, prompting a need for reassurances from the seller. @ExclusiveAutoBrokers addresses this worry by detailing the repair process undertaken by a Mercedes mechanic, explaining the situation thoroughly while also indicating that the overheating issue was resolved. However, this situation may linger as a point of concern for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the impressive aesthetics and unique qualities of the 2002 Audi TT Roadster, with @MooshiPirpy14 reminiscing about fond memories associated with the model's design. @Gumbo emphasizes that these cars are not only fun to drive but also visually appealing, creating excitement around the vehicle's low mileage and one-owner history. Several users commend the dealership, Collectibleclassics, for their smooth and transparent business practices, noting their high Google review ratings and commitment to customer satisfaction.
Neutral: There is a discussion about the vehicle's specifications, particularly regarding its drivetrain, with multiple users confirming that this model is not equipped with the Quattro all-wheel-drive system, as clarified by @RNLabas and @CalBoiler. Inquiries regarding the car's condition are addressed, with @Davisflyer asking about rust and mechanical issues, while the seller responds affirmatively about the absence of rust and provides assurance regarding the car's operational integrity. The seller also shares updates on videos regarding the vehicle's functions and features, indicating that they are working to meet the concerns raised by potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns about the vehicle's service history and the potential need for a timing belt replacement were raised by @Bob_MX5 and @Davisflyer. @Davisflyer specifically asked about any rust and suspension issues, indicating that buyers are cautious about the car's possible age-related deterioration. Additionally, @Gumbo's comments about needing to submit their own vehicle to auction suggest a sense of competition and potential apprehension about selling similar models, indicating that the market may have fluctuating demand.
![]() |
37k-Mile Modified 2004 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Commemorative Edition
1G1YY12S545125464
Lot 226076
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: @PulseCheck described the vehicle as an amazing car for the money, specifically noting its great looks and how it serves as an awesome driving experience. @ward1790 also praised the car's presentation and remarked that it is a nice Z06, indicating satisfaction with both the vehicle's aesthetics and performance. Additionally, @fiveomar highlighted the historical significance of the C5 Z06, emphasizing its exceptional engineering that made it the fastest production car of its time, which enhances its value in the market.
Neutral: @rvaj asked several technical questions regarding the modifications on the vehicle, such as the type of rollbar and if the engine had been tuned, suggesting that potential buyers might want more detailed insights into the car's performance enhancements. @Tobyallen regarded the C5 Z06 as special due to its lightweight design and noted that it has certain driving modes, adding to the vehicle's appeal for enthusiasts without taking a definitive stance. Overall, the discussion reflected a mix of admiration and curiosity about the car's modifications and history.
Negative: @blackdak318 expressed concern about the age of the tires, which are from 2009, indicating a safety risk, especially for someone who might drive the car home after purchase. @Prokill1 pointed out potential issues with the car possibly being tracked or modified extensively, suggesting that the modifications may make the vehicle less desirable to purists and may indicate wear due to heavy use. @psg559 echoed this sentiment, noting signs that the car may have been tracked, which could impact its longevity and reliability, creating apprehension among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 1965 Chevrolet Impala SS has drawn praise for its stunning Mist Blue color, described by @Dollycat3 as "absolutely gorgeous and exceptional." Many commenters appreciate the car's aesthetic appeal, with @hoppy18 agreeing on its beauty. Enthusiasts like @ssclassic note that even though this particular Impala wasn't originally a 409 model, the conversion was done correctly, making it attractive to collectors. The nostalgia associated with the Impala franchise is palpable, with @Slydog reminiscing fondly about their experiences in classic cars, while @Longmire45 enjoys the memories evoked by the vehicle. The combination of the classic design and powerful 409 engine also excites several commenters, reflecting on Chevy's storied performance history.
Neutral: The seller, @911r, provides comprehensive information about the auction process and vehicle history, affirming the car's origins with a 327 engine before being converted to a 409. Several users delve into technical aspects, questioning details about the car such as the gauge on the dashboard and whether the engine is a 340 or 400 hp version. Comments like those from @mike_rockwell bring up mechanical specifics, including the state of the Sun tach, while others like @d2racer raise questions about the absence of certain features like the heater core. Different opinions on the vehicle's trim and engine modifications also surface, with @Ranchero65 pointing out discrepancies in the rear trim and @CarFoolLane discussing the terminology used by BaT regarding engine swaps versus replacements.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about the vehicle's authenticity, particularly regarding its non-original 409 engine. Commenters like @rawhidehaulin express doubt about the accuracy of the vehicle's history, while @52farmtruck notes that a documented original 409 would command a significantly higher price. The trim issues mentioned by @Allis-Acres also affect perceptions about the vehicle's authenticity. Additionally, there are suggestions that the auction descriptions are vague, as mentioned by @mackiesback, leaving buyers frustrated in their search for detailed information. The overall sentiment points to a desire for clearer details while still recognizing the car's beauty and historical importance.
![]() |







































