Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: Commenters share an enthusiastic appreciation for the vehicle's stunning specifications and unique qualities. @Voodoorgv describes it as a 'magnificent blue bull' and a 'masterpiece,' reinforcing the car's remarkable aesthetic. Others like @Johnnyracer222 and @Gmmuscleusa emphasize its appeal, noting that it showcases a well-maintained history while highlighting its beautiful design and rarity. @CatsExotics reminisced about enjoying the car during events, highlighting its enduring character and enjoyment factor, suggesting that it is not just a collectible but also a true driver’s car.
Neutral: Several commenters provided context about the vehicle's history and past ownership, which adds depth to its story. @vance911 (The Seller) highlighted that it is one of only 23 manual LP640 coupes in the USA and the only one in such a striking color, while @edbolian confirmed the car's production breakdown and previous ownerships. The discussions often floated around the vehicle's mileage and how it compares in the collector's market, with some expressing curiosity about its overall service history and repairs made throughout its journey.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback, there were some concerns raised about the mileage which might affect future value perceptions. @a95 and @Mac_attack91 pointed out that the auction's previous sale history and the higher mileage could result in a lower final bid compared to similar models. @Gmmuscleusa acknowledged a general stigma tied to higher mileage vehicles, suggesting that it may deter some collectors worried about the implications of such usage, while others cautioned that mileage could negatively impact value, a sentiment corroborated by several contributors in the discussion.
 |
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the 1967 Ford Mustang Fastback as a magnificent build with stunning craftsmanship. Commentors like @boaboyoz and @Big_DaddyRL express their admiration for the car's impressive modifications and artistic quality, while @Hoppy18 emphasizes the excitement generated for the auction. The Seller, @MSCLASSICCARSLLC, shares that the car represents a significant investment and is considered one of the best custom examples ever offered. Overall, the Mustang is featured as an exceptional piece of automotive art, with attendees eagerly anticipating its auction success.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions about the features of the car, comparing it to similar builds and expressing curiosity about certain components. @LittlePieces questions specific design choices, while @JCHanson inquires about the participation of other brands in the build. Additionally, @Specracer23 suggests that the Ferrari seats incorporated into the Mustang could be reconsidered, sparking a conversation about their value and comfort. These observations indicate a keen interest in understanding the car's design philosophy and technical aspects, reflecting a mix of appreciation and critical inquiry.
Negative: There are a few critical comments focused on certain design elements and costs associated with the build. @Micro912 expresses reservations about the exhaust placement, suggesting it may detract from the original style of the 1967 Mustang. Some users voice concerns about putting Ferrari parts in a Mustang, as mentioned by @CurtisAdrian. Additionally, @Beans_Bacon questions the overall aesthetic of the build in comparison to expectations, which suggests that not all commenters are entirely on board with the choices made during customization. Despite this, the overwhelming positivity surrounding the build's uniqueness and quality prevails in the conversation.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle's aesthetics and restoration quality. @Super-Dave highlights the 'Beautiful Pony!' while @JimmoVette appreciates the 'Beautiful restoration in one of the best ’60s colors ever' and wishes the seller luck with the auction. Other users, such as @funkaholik and @boaboyoz, emphasize the significance of the original Lime Gold color, which was popular in the 60s, and mention how beautiful the car looks without the Le Mans stripes. Enthusiasts like @1Marauder express nostalgia for the 1967 model, noting its beauty and class, supporting the car's appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters ask questions regarding specifics of the vehicle, showing interest in details that would clarify certain features and specifications. @mblaksley inquires about the power steering and @JoeMommia seeks detailed information about speedometers and tachometers for the 67-68 models. Others bring up restoration specifics, like whether the hood is fiberglass or a combination, with @Steve_h (The Seller) providing insights on the restoration process and other parts. The ongoing conversations about features such as the rear brake scoops, gas cap, and functional aspects of the car indicate a blend of appreciation and technical discussion among the enthusiasts.
Negative: There are some concerns raised about the replacement parts and authenticity of the car. @RWClark expresses apprehension about the replacement engine affecting value, while @Nickgo recounts a regretful sale of a past Shelby GT500. Comments from @Desmo51 and @bstyles suggest a stigma against automatic transmissions in performance cars, indicating mixed feelings about the vehicle's configuration. Additionally, @oldcanuck and @LittlePieces raise questions about terminology and specifics around parts that could detract from the car's original allure, fueling discussions around authenticity and restoration accuracy.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praise the vehicle, particularly noting its striking color scheme of Red/Creme with a Black Dash, and its low mileage of just 13,000 miles. @dkyranakis highlighted the exceptional condition of the car, calling it one of the cleanest Testarossas they've seen, emphasizing the quality of both the paint and interior. The inclusion of luxury features such as the Schedoni Luggage and complete factory books adds to the overall allure, appealing especially to serious collectors. @Gpamoney and others express appreciation for the thoroughness of repairs and maintenance, further enhancing the car's appeal.
Neutral: Comments from @ReimelMC (The Seller) provide additional context regarding the vehicle's history and specifications. The seller confirms that the Ferrari Classiche Red Book is included, validating its originality. They also address any concerns about repairs, explaining that minor scratches were attended to without involving an insurance claim. Furthermore, the seller actively engages with potential buyers, offering to answer questions and provide further documentation or photos, which demonstrates transparency.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback, some users noted concerns regarding the vehicle's body fitment. @Astonman76 questioned the unusual poor fit around the doors, while others raised inquiries about the checks on the instrument cluster removal during repairs. Some express a desire for more detailed information regarding the stereo system and repairs on the car's components, indicating a need for further clarification and inspection to satisfy potential buyers' concerns.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the aesthetic appeal and overall quality of the 2002 Dodge Viper RT/10, with @Gmmuscleusa praising the wheels and their integration with the car's styling. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, received compliments about the car's condition and was proactive in responding to inquiries, showcasing transparency and customer service. Additionally, the underbody of the car is described as 'drop dead gorgeous' with no visible rust, indicating it has been well-maintained over the years, which adds to its value as a classic vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific details regarding the car's features and history. @ILLMAX1 asked about the stock rims, while @yogibare requested startup videos and expressed concern about potential oil leaks despite previous resolutions. Other inquiries from @Abershofie and @Merlin1973 focused on maintenance issues like the slow passenger window and the existence of catalytic converters for emissions compliance, showcasing potential buyer concerns that are common for classic cars.
Negative: Despite its appealing qualities, some negative comments pointed out imperfections, such as a dent on the driver's side sill and aftermarket modifications like the exhaust system and wheels. @Viking_GCI and @RFree noted these issues, suggesting that buyers should carefully inspect the car to assess its originality and compliance with emissions standards, especially for those in areas with strict regulations. Overall, while the vehicle has many positives, these critiques highlight areas that might warrant additional attention.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the 1987 Porsche 911 Coupe highlight its impressive aesthetics and driveability. @enthusiastspec praised the car's excellent condition and its potential for memorable drives, suggesting it would be perfect for rally events. @SRFdriver and @MikeMaurer both expressed admiration for the vehicle's beautiful presentation and the integrity of the seller. The modifications were well-received by many; @rocs elaborated on the thoughtful craftsmanship behind the build, while @Lilptr appreciated the execution of the G50 build, noting its hot rod status.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a balanced view on the car's features. @auniha and @smarkbuyer2020 asked for additional information about engine modifications and a cold start video, indicating curiosity but not dissatisfaction. @jcp911s shared a mixed analysis that focused on the car's identity as a hot rod, rather than a direct replica of iconic IROC models, which opened up a discussion about aesthetic choices. @motoguzzi70 also expressed a question about the aftermarket tach face without negative connotations, showing engagement with the vehicle's specifications.
Negative: Some users voiced concerns about the car's history, particularly regarding odometer discrepancies and potential mileage. @SmartBuyer2020 mentioned the unknown state of the engine and transmission, suggesting that repairs should be considered given the cosmetic modifications. @steve-racer pointed out that while he found the car beautiful, it wouldn’t hold the same value as an original IROC model, implying that the modifications might polarize potential bidders. Additionally, concerns raised about a crack in the fender and its visibility further suggested that more attention could be given to these issues.
|
 |
Positive: @Samerar1 expressed love for the vehicle, while @RWB_AZ described it as a beauty. @TreborPJ found it stunning, and @tista highlighted its knockout appeal despite initial reservations about the wheels. @62beettruck echoed this sentiment, noting its uniqueness and love for its colors. @boaboyoz praised it as a superb specimen, and @BaerBronco called it sweet and clean, appreciating its stance. @tlcamg appreciated the design choice, indicating that it's all about personal preference, and @mcraeke62 admired the professionalism of the bodywork.
Neutral: @CDehne was curious about the choice of 20" wheels, while @Wilks inquired about the functionality of the truck's turn signals. @carstruck mentioned liking the overall look but suggested a wheel change for practicality. @INDPNDT asked about the gas tank location and suspension changes. @moparnut72 queried if there were changes to the wheel arches, and @Danohawk pointed out a spelling error, which the seller acknowledged and corrected. Concerns about the vehicle's stock look and wheel size were brought up by several users, though they noted that everyone has personal preferences.
Negative: @HardTruckDriver criticized the wheel choice, stating they were more wheel than tire for a Highboy. @a990dna mentioned that the 20" wheels don't fit the old-school vibe, suggesting that changes should maintain aesthetics. @Oliver2711 and @ScottNThompson both commented on the wheels, thinking they were over the top. @carstruck also noted that clearer photos should be provided to assess the condition properly, expressing some disappointment in the quality of images of critical areas. Overall, some commenters felt the vehicle's modifications strayed too far from traditional designs.
|
 |
Positive: @Pettyfan43 praises the vehicle for its nice modifications, decent mileage, and attributes its high price to the current market trends for supercars, calling it the best supercar ever. @Hoppy18 mentions a recent successful sale of a similar model, hinting that this particular car should do well due to its ideal condition. @butane expresses surprise at how stunning the white GT looks, noting that it showcases the car's lines beautifully. @FordGTArchive finds this example beautiful and highlights its low mileage, which accentuates its timeless design.
Neutral: @rrv912 (The Seller) appreciates the interest and bids, providing a detailed description of the vehicle's condition and modifications. He notes a few typical wear spots but assures potential buyers of the car's overall attractiveness. @Sunbeamdon reminisces about the car's past during its initial sales period, sharing personal anecdotes of regretting past missed opportunities regarding similar cars. @Tex5089 discusses his own experiences with GTs, explaining the common modifications made to enhance performance without compromising the drivetrain.
Negative: @njcycleguy raises concerns about a possible mileage discrepancy, hinting at the challenges in confirming a vehicle's actual mileage, especially for a Canadian delivered car. @chooblaykhan questions the accuracy of the mileage and the possibility of verifying it through ECU data, suggesting that this should be a condition for the sale. @AmericanMuscles expresses skepticism about the ability to verify mileage on these vehicle models due to the lack of tracking systems in place and urges potential buyers to research more about the car's history.
|
 |
Positive: The listing for the 2015 Mercedes-Benz SL400 by @Collectibleclassics exudes confidence in the vehicle's condition, highlighting its immaculate underbody and original paint. The seller explains that the car has been garage-kept, contributing to its low mileage while remaining well-maintained. It features a new set of tires and an interior that is in showroom condition, suggesting the vehicle has been treated with care. This aligns with their transparency commitment, aiming to address potential buyers' concerns and providing access for inspections through trusted local shops.
Neutral: Several commenters raised inquiries about the vehicle's ownership history, which includes five previous owners over just 13,000 miles. @HankHorders and @RichFX express curiosity about why cars with low mileage often have multiple owners, questioning whether it indicates underlying issues. In response, @Collectibleclassics provides a rationale, suggesting that previous owners may have used the car sporadically and sold it for various reasons, justifying the number of owners without implying mechanical faults.
Negative: Skepticism arises from some commenters regarding the vehicle's ownership background and condition. @tomcolt3 and @gscharnagl question the implications of five owners in such a short timeframe, while @Oilman suggests the car has spent much time being transported. Additionally, @rdk25benz raises concerns about the mechanical integrity, asking specifically about potential leaks. These doubts contrast against the seller's reassurances, possibly deterring some potential buyers from considering the vehicle despite its otherwise appealing features.
|
 |
Positive: @hcarlpast, the seller of this Aston Martin V8 Vantage, expresses a deep affection for the vehicle, having owned it for 16 years without significant mechanical issues. Many commenters praise the car for its driving experience and aesthetics; @Mach85 highlights the unique feeling of driving the Vantage compared to more modern cars. @SeaTacTom shares his positive personal experience, claiming his own V8 Vantage has had no issues since purchase. The honesty in the listing about the car's condition is appreciated, with @westcoastcars mentioning that the value of these cars, particularly manual models, is on the rise. Several comments admire the car's color combination, noting how it makes the interior feel airy and pleasant.
Neutral: Some comments focus on the technical aspects of the car's condition. @Thisisabadidea mentions a locking issue with the passenger door that occurs intermittently, while @arirochmann provides a repair link for the delaminating polarized film on the instrument gauges. Various commentators inquire about the maintenance history, including oil changes and tire conditions, prompting @hcarlpast to confirm regular service records and satisfactory maintenance over the years. Additionally, concerns about the paint touch-ups and minor blemishes are noted, but these details do not diminish overall interest in the vehicle.
Negative: However, the seller does disclose some drawbacks; the navigation system is inoperable, with an exorbitant replacement cost quoted by the dealership, and the AM radio also does not work. @Misanthrope raises questions about potential fuel system or electrical issues, while @blackjags comments on the difficulties of determining fair market value for specialty vehicles like this Aston Martin, given their unique characteristics and varying conditions. The discussion on pricing shows that while the car's overall reputation is strong, some potential buyers remain cautious due to the noted issues and maintenance history.
|
16k-Mile 2012 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS RS 45th Anniversary Edition Coupe 6-Speed
2G1FT1EW3C9121161
Lot 226125
Dealer
 |
Positive: Several users expressed positive sentiments about the 2012 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS RS 45th Anniversary Edition Coupe, highlighting its appeal as a comfortable and powerful vehicle. @Phk36 mentioned that the car is very enjoyable to drive, offering significant power as needed, and noted its effectiveness as a summer vehicle suitable even for daily use due to decent fuel mileage. @68hurst and others shared their positive experiences with low-miles and untouched models, emphasizing the car's overall quality and desirability.
Neutral: There were some neutral comments focusing on the vehicle's specifications and details rather than personal experiences. @mrtew provided a technical clarification regarding the model's anniversary designation being the 38th due to the production gap in Camaro history. Discussions about specific parts like 'roof ditch moldings' and the helpful responses to such inquiries, such as from @eshill explaining the term, reflect an informative and collaborative atmosphere among potential buyers.
Negative: Conversely, some negative aspects were pointed out, particularly concerning the vehicle's safety recalls. @newcarpro outlined a significant recall regarding ignition key issues that could impact power and steering, emphasizing a potential crash risk if not addressed. This situation introduces concerns for potential buyers about the car's safety compliance and the necessity of adjustments until repairs are made.
|
 |
Positive: @Zagsmaniac (The Seller) expresses a strong affection for the van, named Reba, highlighting that it has been well cared for throughout its life. The seller emphasizes its reliability, stating that it can cruise comfortably at both 60 and 70 mph, which is a significant selling point for potential buyers. Other commenters, such as @a410traveler, enjoy lighthearted banter about the van and express their admiration for the unique qualities and history of the vehicle, showing that there is a positive community around it. @Mothertrucker22 shares nostalgic memories of similar vehicles, which adds to the overall positive vibe associated with the van.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the vehicle's condition and history in a neutral manner. @FreddieLEdelman inquires about the feasibility of safely driving the van from Washington to New York, reflecting practical considerations rather than emotional attachment. @Zagsmaniac (The Seller) suggests shipping the van due to weather conditions and its rear-wheel-drive configuration, indicating a level of pragmatism necessary for long-distance travel. Additionally, @Mothertrucker22 recounts a humorous and nostalgic driving incident involving a similar bus, maintaining a level of neutrality while sharing personal experiences.
Negative: No negative comments were recorded in the discussion thread regarding the vehicle, as most interactions tend to be lighthearted or affectionate towards the nature of the van and its history. However, @FreddieLEdelman's inquiry regarding the vehicle's safety for long-distance driving could imply a sense of caution that is typical when discussing older vehicles, suggesting that there may be underlying concerns about the van's performance or condition that are not explicitly voiced.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praises the vehicle by describing it as a nice TD, indicating a favorable impression. @Kenny360 expresses admiration for the W123 TD, calling it a workhorse that remains reliable and versatile, suitable for various tasks. @ChapmansKato appreciates the seller's transparency and the effort taken to provide detailed information along with multiple videos, suggesting that such practices are sensible for buyers.
Neutral: @EMG01 (The Seller) presents a comprehensive overview of the car, answering questions from potential buyers like @bassid about the Not Actual Mileage label and clarifying the engine refreshment done in 2019. They also confirm that the air conditioning works and provide specifics about the vehicle's service records and condition. @MilwaukeeEngineer provides insights on the car's interior wear and repainting, while also acknowledging the general characteristics of this model's aging.
Negative: @tripperdre and @PegasusRider both raise concerns about the potential transmission flare and the engine's idle sound in the driving video, which they urge the seller to address with further video evidence. @Deadbolt expresses confusion about what 'engine refreshed' entails, seeking clarification, while @Traxx72 questions the odometer's authenticity based on its design. Overall, some comments suggest potential issues that make buyers cautious.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @Collectibleclassics, provides an engaging introduction to the auction of the 2005 Honda S2000, highlighting their commitment to sourcing unique vehicles and ensuring smooth transactions. They emphasize the positive reputation of their dealership, boasting a high customer rating of 4.9/5.0 from numerous positive Google reviews. Additionally, the seller welcomes potential buyers to visit for inspections and offers logistics support, including shipping options. @rickmnsx acknowledges the quality driving experience, although mentioning the driving video could have been more spirited, confirming that the vehicle drives nicely and shifts well.
Neutral: Several comments from observers indicate minor concerns about the vehicle's condition. @brian7470 points out the absence of VIN tags on the front end, which @Collectibleclassics explains is due to a cosmetic repaint while emphasizing the repairs done were entirely superficial. @s219 raises issues with the alignment of the side marker light and S2000 emblem, indicative of body shop workmanship, which the seller assures is within acceptable standards. Furthermore, @2manywheels draws attention to a tear in the soft top, prompting the seller to offer solutions for repair, including a patch or full replacement, showing a willingness to address buyer concerns.
Negative: However, some critiques reveal underlying issues with the vehicle. The soft top has developed a tear, as noted by @2manywheels and confirmed by @Mark_in_Thousand_Oaks, who shares a similar experience with their S2000. @s219 describes the historical context of this issue and recommends careful attentiveness to repairs if not handled properly. The overall sentiment suggests that while the vehicle is desirable, it has notable imperfections that may deter potential buyers, particularly regarding its cosmetic repairs and the condition of the soft top, which may require further attention.
|
 |
Positive: @Raven888 mentions that the vehicle looks great in blue, appreciating its color over the common white models, and expresses excitement about importing a newer model. @DurranJapan expresses a personal connection to the vehicle by reminiscing about living in Kobe and expresses interest in buying it just for the plates. The Seller, @carsfromafar, provides helpful information about the truck's capabilities and offers to arrange shipping anywhere in the USA, showcasing customer service and support.
Neutral: @gtill9000 asks about a tolerable cruising speed for the kei truck, indicating an interest in its performance on highways. @JSTEF inquires about the vehicle's capacity to haul street bikes, showing curiosity regarding its usability. @carsfromafar responds to these comments, providing specific details about cruising speeds and weight limits that clarify the vehicle's operational capabilities.
Negative: @puebla comments skeptically about the aesthetics of using Watanabe wheels on a kei truck, suggesting it might be an excessive modification. This implies a concern about the vehicle's design and suitability for its intended function.
|
 |
Positive: @bforbesut expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as "funky" and indicating a love for its unique style. @dcscars, a former Mercedes employee with extensive experience, praised the R-Class for its exceptional ride quality, practicality, low step-in height, and visibility, noting that it rides like an S-Class. They highlighted the overall build quality and the brand's peak design and quality during the 2007-2008 period, stating that this particular vehicle appears to be well-maintained and in good cosmetic condition.
Neutral: @AM51 (The Seller) provided detailed descriptions of the vehicle's unique selling points, including its combination of luxury and practicality, as well as its suitability for families due to easy entry and exit. The comments also emphasized the vehicle's low mileage, all-wheel drive capability, and recent maintenance, including new tires and alignment, ensuring readiness for both city driving and long trips. The seller welcomed inquiries from potential buyers and provided assurances regarding the car's condition, including its clean Carfax and California emissions inspection history.
Negative: @anujs2k raised a concern about why the vehicle is back for sale so soon after being purchased in April/May, suggesting uncertainty about the seller's motivations or the car's desirability. Additionally, @jorodriguez90 inquired about the absence of a blind spot warning system, indicating that some potential buyers may desire additional safety features that this vehicle may lack.
|
 |
Positive: @mktstrategy highlights the excitement of owning a unique vehicle, describing it as a "7000 rpm redline Alfa minivan" which evokes enthusiasm among potential buyers. @CKKurtz expresses appreciation for the car's availability in the US, hoping it would serve as a fun and distinct track day car. Additionally, @EdwoodCA shares a humorous note about driving this Alfa shooting brake, further engaging with the car's appealing character.
Neutral: Multiple inquiries focused on the vehicle's condition and specifics, such as @Vintageant asking about the solid glass driver’s side window and the spare tire, and @Wasserhund requesting a video demonstrating the gear operations. @carsfromafar, the seller, provides clear answers about the functioning of the window and confirms the absence of the spare tire, indicating that weight was saved for optimal track performance. The seller also reassures interested buyers about the car's gearbox and mentions plans to post various photos and driving videos during the auction.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding certain issues with the vehicle, including @Vintageant's query about the non-functional air conditioning and the condition of its components, while @Adnogal inquired about the timing belt change. @jimmy2300S pointed out that a short video of the engine running with the new ECU would help instill confidence in potential bidders. There were also mentions of the car's prior ECU problems, highlighting a significant expense incurred by the seller to replace it, which might concern some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg: Great looking Carrera Coupe! Best wishes. @boaboyoz: This 997.1 coupe, wearing Basalt Black Metallic over Sand Beige, is incredibly stylish – GLWTA! @B.Fryk: That aside, black over sand beige is such an elegantly sophisticated combo for a 911. GLWTA! @SL505: Beautiful car, though — 997s are getting more interesting by the day.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller): Welcome to Collectible Classics, Bring a Trailer auction of this 49k-Mile 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe. We source unique vehicles from private sellers and are committed to smooth, transparent transactions. Inspections are welcome, and we offer nationwide/international shipping and services. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller): Hello and welcome to the 2nd day of this wonderful auction! Regarding the navigation mentioned by @sagarm, the description was incorrect, and we could not get the maps to work. @jlp24: The tires that are dated 2016, are those front or rear? @Collectibleclassics (The Seller): Correct, fronts are 2016 and rears are 2022.
Negative: @sagarm: The video shows that map/navigation is not available. However, the description states PCM with Navigation. Is the navigation not working or the description incorrect? @nfs10: In the cold startup video, after about ~1min, I can hear some ticking/knocking sound (coming from the engine, I presume). Is this normal? @DrMattyB: Knocking is audible. IMS looms. Any info? @Carsaholic: There is a marked difference in the appearance of the interior's sand beige color, suggesting the videos offer a more accurate depiction of the real-world color.
|
 |
Positive: @kenbaker1265 (The Seller) presents this Jaguar XK8 convertible as a spectacular vehicle with only 15,000 miles, claiming it has been meticulously maintained and requires no immediate repairs. Commenters such as @garbanzoe express admiration for the car's beauty and value, noting that it has more value than their own coupe. Several participants, including @billyblyth, appreciate the vehicle's merits, highlighting its good maintenance when originating from Florida, where road conditions may have contributed to less wear and tear. Overall comments suggest that potential buyers recognize the aesthetic and operational qualities of the vehicle, as indicated by @Gary_T1, noting the gorgeous and low-mileage nature of the car.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, with @gilbybarr and @CC3698 asking for specific details about the service records, tire conditions, and assurance that critical systems like the convertible top and cam chain tensioners have been addressed. The seller has responded to these by providing service records and encouraging independent inspections to verify claims. This kind of dialogue indicates a healthy concern from potential buyers to gather necessary information about the car's condition and service history.
Negative: On the flip side, there are notable concerns regarding the vehicle, particularly its history with cam chain tensioners and convertible top hydraulic lines. Commenters like @kurtkline and @OhU8one2 caution potential buyers about the likelihood of necessary maintenance based on the vehicle's age and historical issues related to those parts. @BBMD also shares a personal experience of costly repairs, emphasizing that even a low-mileage car may incur significant future maintenance costs. This cautious sentiment hints at underlying concerns that buyers should consider before making a bid.
|
 |
Positive: @Ptrem described the vehicle as a "Beautiful truck" and a "time capsule," praising its overall appeal. @Wiggleattack complimented the impressive state of the vehicle, requesting before-and-after photos, and @Discobob expressed admiration for the interior and retro features, calling it a "gem made into a really sweet gem." @GGALLAZ (The Seller) acknowledged the positive feedback and confirmed the car has a Texas Title indicating a rebuilt salvage designation, further detailing the vehicle's restoration work. The praises echoed the effort put into the 4Runner's revival, with several commenters appreciating the nostalgia and build quality of older Toyota models.
Neutral: Several commenters had inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition, performance, and history. @ChrisCJC asked about the functionality of different components like A/C and four-wheel drive, demonstrating interest in the vehicle's reliability for practical use. @LBS1000 requested clarification about dents on the frame, and @mshaefAZ79 raised questions about insurance status and alignment. @Seeya inquired about the VIN location for titling, indicating a serious consideration for potential buyers. @GGALLAZ (The Seller) responded comprehensively to these inquiries, confirming that the majority of the vehicle has been refurbished and that essential systems like the A/C are functioning properly.
Negative: Some negative comments pointed towards uncertainties regarding the vehicle's history and current state. @Hoseclamp questioned whether the vehicle carries a salvage title, reflecting concern over potential issues that might arise from its classification. @adrenalinsports expressed doubt about the vehicle's performance at highway speeds, suggesting that it might struggle to maintain 65-70 mph reliably. @GGALLAZ (The Seller) recognized this concern and emphasized the vehicle's vintage nature, advising buyers to consider it more of a cruiser for short drives rather than a daily driver. Overall, there were lingering questions about visibility and maintenance of the VINs, which could pose challenges for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle's aesthetics and performance. @Dollycat3 highlights its beautiful classic color combination, sunroof, and comprehensive documentation. @jc4511 appreciates the unique blue and white colors along with the floor mats, while @dickz reminisces about his own positive experiences with a similar model and emphasizes its reliability and comfort on long trips. @rwantin shares a fond memory connected to a 280SE 4.5, emphasizing the nostalgic feel and joy of owning such a car. Overall, many participants highlight the car's beauty, quality of driving experience, and emotional connections tied to this classic vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @Jwct, provides comprehensive insights into the vehicle’s history and current condition, answering questions from potential buyers. They mention the car's acquisition from an auction and outline maintenance performed, including fluid changes and repairs, like the exhaust and suspension enhancements. They also detail the condition of various components, such as the HVAC system, emphasizing the importance of transparency in the listing. Commenters @Rilke00 and @Doremonger request additional photos to clarify the condition of specific areas, showing a collective interest in addressing any concerns prospective buyers may have.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @Rilke00 points out what appears to be cracks on the dashboard, and @Baddogdesmo and @MSH55 note inconsistencies or potential oversights in the seller's descriptions. @Penderosa expresses hesitance about the vehicle’s ongoing maintenance needs, emphasizing the importance of finding a capable local mechanic for service. Additionally, questions about the A/C, electrical systems, and other components highlight potential buyer apprehensions about unforeseen issues. Overall, the comments reflect a mixture of admiration and caution regarding the vehicle's maintenance and condition.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a general admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning appearance, particularly the Fathom Green color and the houndstooth interior. @boaboyoz and @funkaholik noted its beauty and craftsmanship, with @JAY-Z mentioning its appealing features such as the rebuilt 350 engine and the substantial upgrades, which contribute to its allure as a classic muscle car. Many users express excitement and enthusiasm for the car, with compliments like "nice looking street machine" from @JayKay2430 and strong positivity from @greatscott, who simply remarked, "Beautiful."
Neutral: There is a mixed understanding of the vehicle's specifications and history among commentators. @Jonderefan inquired about the dyno numbers but received a response from the seller, @Minotti, who admitted he did not have that information, although he confirmed the car runs well. Various users discussed whether the car is a true SS model, with @BULLITT65 noting discrepancies in the engine's history, while @WhiteyTx1 regarded it as a well-done restoration but pointed out its X11 designation as an indicator it may not be a factory SS. Additionally, commenters sought clarity on certain features, like the "ice cube tray" option, leading to exchanges of information among users and the seller.
Negative: While there is significant appreciation, some users raised concerns about the authenticity and documentation of the vehicle. @RJASI303 questioned aspects of the car's construction, speculating about modifications to the firewall and requesting further pictures, while @gt2ski asked whether any components, such as gauges or lights, were malfunctioning. @T1934 expressed curiosity about potential flaws in the paintwork, pointing to a specific photo that led to a reassuring response from @Minotti, who insisted that the paint and finish were flawless. Overall, although the comments appreciate the car's aesthetics and build quality, there are lingering doubts about its original specs and history.
|
 |
Positive: @john_chamorro describes the F250 as a workhorse, noting its durability with countless trucks of the same model under his belt. @Sportscarclassics provides detailed insights about the truck's restoration and upgrades, highlighting its rust-free condition and the impressive rebuild of the engine and interior. Commentators @B0909 and @BaerBronco express admiration for the truck’s beauty and its striking maroon color, while @Chickenrig praises the high quality of restoration and the seller's dedication to keeping the spirit of classic trucks alive.
Neutral: @Sportscarclassics shares important information about the truck's specifications, including its unique factory options like the Dana 60 front end and limited slip rear end, along with the improvements made during restoration. Commentator @TidyRigs engages in a conversation regarding the practicality of the truck's lift and briefcase handles. Questions regarding the truck's specifications and features, such as the axle configurations and interior details are raised by commentators like @john_chamorro and @Matt_67Fastback, prompting the seller to clarify and update necessary information.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about inaccuracies in the listed axle configurations, with @john_chamorro pointing out potential discrepancies. @minidude questions the depiction of seatbelts in the images, noting that the description seems inconsistent. While no severe criticisms of the truck's overall quality are mentioned, the need for clarifications implies that potential buyers are keen on ensuring that all features are accurately represented, reflecting a need for transparency in the listing.
|
 |
Positive: @eldonchas described the vehicle as a magnificent piece of Americana, highlighting its features like the 4-speed transmission and convertible top. @Gord6 also noted that the car has all the right options and considers it a real bargain at its current price. @Gary_T1 mentioned that the car would be a bargain at double the current bid due to its rare XL package with the 390 engine and 4-speed transmission, suggesting it has solid potential if presented correctly.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions about the car's condition and presentation. @corvettom9 asked if everything on the car works and why the seller is parting with it so soon after purchase. @flatop inquired why the vehicle is being auctioned again shortly after its last sale. @Noisyboyz criticized the lack of detailed photographs and noted the seller's minimal feedback, which may hurt the auction's success.
Negative: Commenters expressed concerns about the vehicle's maintenance and listing strategy. @12AX7 cautioned potential buyers about the lack of updates from the seller, suggesting possible issues with frame damage or rust. @Zoraspride commented on the engine sound being concerning, questioning the car's health based on its exhaust. @Roadmaster lamented the poor presentation of the listing, noting the absence of key details and a driving video that would have helped build buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are highly impressed with the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, particularly the unique color combination of the Destroyer Grey exterior paired with a striking red interior. @KurtWalters noted that the red interior complements the grey paint beautifully, while @FBCB called it a killer look, expressing that it would be their choice if they were in the market. @Gmmuscleusa agreed, reflecting a strong appreciation for this color pairing, and several commenters echoed this sentiment, emphasizing how visually appealing the vehicle is.
Neutral: The seller, @Collectibleclassics, provided a comprehensive introduction to the vehicle, emphasizing their commitment to transparency in the auction process and their high customer satisfaction ratings. They mentioned their services, including nationwide shipping and vehicle inspections, to facilitate potential buyers. @sy1616 requested clarification on comments regarding the vehicle's imperfections, to which the seller responded, assuring that any visual flaws were typical for a car of this nature and age, and highlighted that inspection videos were available for potential buyers.
Negative: However, the vehicle has received some criticism, particularly regarding imperfections on the front bumper and body arches as noted by @b5challengershaker. Although they suggested the application of paint protection film (PPF) as a preventive measure, @georgepehanick and @2quik6 affirmed that minor chips and imperfections do not deter their interest in the car. Conversely, @onebadlsc expressed concerns about the auction market's recent trends, indicating that current economic conditions might affect the vehicle's sale price negatively.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, particularly praising its color combination. @Aknatar mentioned it being the 'best color combo'. The seller, @collectibleclassics, received positive feedback about their operations, highlighting a commendable 4.9/5.0 rating based on numerous five-star reviews, indicating customer satisfaction with previous transactions.
Neutral: Several inquiries pertained to the vehicle's condition and maintenance history, showcasing potential buyers' diligence in research. @jthe sought specific information about the rod bearing replacement and rear subframe reinforcement, which the seller, @collectibleclassics, acknowledged, but unfortunately, they couldn't provide the required documentation. @4mtbs requested a video showcasing the convertible top's operation, showing interest in additional features of the vehicle without any significant concerns about the car itself.
Negative: On the downside, there were apparent gaps in the maintenance records, as noted by @jthe, who expressed disappointment at the lack of documentation on significant component replacements. Furthermore, a suggested inspection before the auction’s end was not feasible for the seller, leading to possible frustration. The inquiry from @Finimin about the vehicle's price also hinted that it may not align with expectations, emphasizing doubts about whether the asking price meets the perceived value.
|
 |
Positive: @WorkingmanUSA commented that it's the best looking Acty they have seen, and expressed gratitude for the interesting offering. @KrustyBurger highlighted the uniqueness of the vehicle and expressed interest, while @12PACK appreciated the 'Louis Vuitton-style upholstery' and noted the vehicle’s distinctiveness. Also, @Crovet pointed out the rarity of having automatic transmission with air conditioning in a kei truck, emphasizing it as a desirable combination. Additionally, @carsfromafar shared positive experiences, mentioning how well the Acty performs in town and that it has been well-received during local events, like a Christmas parade.
Neutral: @KrustyBurger inquired about the vehicle's top speed, questioning if it is primarily intended for in-town use and if it can be licensed in all states. @JSTEF asked whether it would be capable of hauling a street bike, or potentially two. @carsfromafar addressed both comments by providing details on the vehicle’s capabilities, mentioning it can reach a top speed of 100 km/h and clarifying licensing issues vary by state. This indicates a practical understanding of the vehicle's usability as a daily driver within certain contexts.
Negative: @12PACK expressed some skepticism about the vehicle's upholstery being described as 'Louis Vuitton-style.' Furthermore, @JSTEF questioned the truck's capacity to haul bikes, suggesting concerns about whether it's robust enough for such tasks. @carsfromafar clarified the truck's abilities, suggesting that while it can handle an average-weight street bike, it's essential for potential owners to understand the vehicle's limitations, especially regarding its intended use. This indicates some buyers may be worried about the vehicle's practical applications.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments from various commenters, highlighting its quality and desirability. @BkBen84 describes it as a "quite nice example," while @voodooboy shares a positive personal experience with a similar model purchased five years ago, referring to it as a 'weapon.' @bmdaia expresses excitement about the model, calling the 3-pedal Mezger Cab "gorgeous" and collectible, complimenting specific pictures from the auction. @boaboyoz also praises the color scheme, indicating it as "totally fab." Overall, many commenters seem to have a favorable opinion of the car's attributes and styling.
Neutral: The seller, @Collectibleclassics, provides detailed information about the auction process, their commitment to transparency, and the quality of their inventory. They respond to inquiries about vehicle inspections, DME reports, and the potential for a pre-purchase inspection (PPI) during the auction. They acknowledge various questions regarding the car’s condition and provide explanations, including information on repairs made to the vehicle's components. Furthermore, they emphasize the importance of ensuring buyers feel confident in the bidding process, offering logistics support if needed.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised regarding the car's condition and lack of comprehensive service history. Commenters like @Car_collector and @blong have asked for detailed descriptions of any flaws, suggesting that previous scratches from earlier sales weren't adequately addressed in the current auction. @PMUZI expresses frustration at the seller's response to bore score inspection requests, implying that the seller's lack of proactive communication may indicate issues with the vehicle. Additionally, there are requests for clarity on registration services and the vehicle's tire condition, with @Fede1983 seeking more specifics. Overall, while the car is praised, there are significant concerns about transparency and preparation for sale.
|
 |
Positive: @borninthe60s described the vehicle as a "beautiful Beemer" in an attractive color combination, complimenting its clean undercarriage and engine bay. @everythingmerc, who owns a 135i, agrees, stating that the color and wheel combo are extremely attractive and wishing the seller luck with the sale. @JNelly expressed their admiration for the color blue, reminiscing about their own 2010 BMW 135i and wishing the seller good luck as well.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) introduced the vehicle and highlighted their dealership's reputation for sourcing unique cars. They provided details on inspection options and services available for transportation. In response to questions about maintenance from @426Elephant and @1AM, they reassured potential buyers about the vehicle's condition, mentioning fresh oil and just-installed tires. They also disclosed that the vehicle does not have its original catalytic converters, which could be a concern for emissions tests.
Negative: @raykosh raised a potential issue regarding the vehicle's compliance with California smog regulations, stating it would likely fail visual and emissions tests. This was confirmed by @Collectibleclassics (The Seller), who noted that they do not possess the original catalytic converters and that while the car is functioning well, it may not pass inspection. Such concerns may deter potential buyers, highlighting the importance of understanding emissions regulations.
|
 |
Positive: @RjwhitAlpha notes the striking color change of the Rosso Competizione 4C, highlighting its appeal in different lighting, and expresses excitement about the car. @Turbowned appreciates the color combination of the car with its silver Teledials, calling it the best spec, and expresses a humorous desire to buy it. The overall consensus from commenters like @JWHBOOMER and @RjwhitAlpha indicates that the car is visually stunning and has a strong aesthetic appeal, which is appreciated by enthusiasts.
Neutral: @NJlongboarder (The Seller) responds to inquiries about maintenance records, admitting a lack of detailed documentation on the timing belt or chassis bolts, while also possessing regular oil change receipts, indicating transparency about the vehicle's history. @ericono asks about maintenance records and aftermarket equipment, showing that prospective buyers are interested in the car's service history and specifications. The presence of several inquiries about timing belt service and other maintenance reflects a common concern among potential buyers regarding the car's upkeep.
Negative: Comments from @skeenariverrover criticize the handling of the BaT auction, suggesting it is not being run properly, while @chester7 expresses skepticism about the expected timing belt maintenance, questioning whether it would be replaced in 2018 on a 2016 model. @smitti raises practical concerns about fitting into the car, expressing doubt about whether someone of his stature could comfortably drive it, which points to potential issues with the car’s ergonomics. Overall, these remarks highlight apprehensions about the vehicle's maintenance history and user comfort.
|
Vortec-Powered 1974 International Harvester Scout II 4×4
20k Miles Shown, TMU
Lot 226146
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the overall aesthetic and modifications of the Scout, highlighting its classy appearance. @RalGuy22 called it a 'classy Scout,' while @boaboyoz described it as a 'Sage Green dream of a Scout.' @DENWERKS praised the color scheme, specifically noting the attractive red accents against the Sage Green. @mspaulding88 noted the 'amazing color combo' and the 'tasteful modifications,' suggesting that it maintains the classic Scout look while incorporating modern upgrades. Overall, the vehicle seems well-received, with many praising its beauty and build quality.
Neutral: The seller, @Dews41, provided detailed information regarding various aspects of the vehicle, including the sources of the front seats and the condition of the windshield. @Wildmanbill57 inquired about the windshield, which @Dews41 confirmed had been replaced. Multiple users asked technical questions about the engine and transmission, demonstrating interest in the vehicle's capabilities. The seller also mentioned the installation of modern amenities, like power locks and a Bluetooth device, which adds convenience for potential buyers. Overall, the comments included informative exchanges about the Scout's features.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about minor imperfections, such as hail damage on the hardtop mentioned by @B_McDirty and potential rust on the bumpers noted by @DustinOC. @DustinOC asked specifically if the rear bumper was crooked, showing that not all perceptions were entirely positive. Additionally, @Baja1978 sought clarification on the miles driven since the engine's installation and whether it had been rebuilt. These comments indicate that while the vehicle is celebrated, there are reservations about certain aspects that could affect its value.
|
 |
Positive: @Invictos2022 has noted that there have been no issues with the vehicle since the recent engine replacement, stating that it has only been driven casually and on weekends, which suggests a well-maintained vehicle. The seller also provided clear details about the recent engine work, including a specific mileage since the repairs, which adds to the credibility of the vehicle's condition. Furthermore, the information about the vehicle’s history, including ownership and repairs, has been shared transparently, which is appreciated by potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters have requested clarification on the vehicle's engine specifications and history, indicating some confusion regarding the details. @porschey specifically questioned the horsepower of the new engine and its origin as a stock engine, while @MoRhino sought additional information on the Defender's internet history. These inquiries highlight the need for more transparency and information about the vehicle's specifications and prior history to address potential buyers' concerns.
Negative: @TZ1-0047 expressed concern regarding the frame condition of the vehicle, indicating that their mechanic had identified possible issues and requested more information. This raises potential red flags for prospective buyers about the structural integrity of the vehicle. Additionally, there was a mention of an ended eBay listing and confusion regarding the vehicle's history, which could lead to doubts about its past transactions and repairs, as raised by @porschey.
|
 |
Positive: @JayKay2430 fondly reminisces about the S10's debut, praising its attractive styling and diverse options available back in '94. @TPH56 appreciates the truck's visibility in parking lots, indicating it stands out. @Capt_Nemo admires the rear bumper design, noting it integrates well with the truck's overall aesthetics, enhancing its appeal.
Neutral: @JLsKA510 clarifies the truck's actual color, countering another commenter's observation. @IconicMotorsOKC (The Seller) responds to several inquiries regarding the truck's specifications, including confirming it’s 2 wheel drive and the condition of the tires. @RBBarkley raises questions about the previous registration status in Texas, seeking assurance on the truck's documentation and history.
Negative: @RBBarkley is concerned about the expired Texas registration sticker and whether the truck comes with valid registration. @GMT400Man expresses hesitation due to the high dealer fee and mentions their doubts raised by negative reviews of the dealership. @WW711 questions the lack of usage for over 12 years and the overall transparency of the dealer, highlighting potential issues with communication and service.
|
 |
Positive: @ohiolion highlighted the smooth power delivery of the vehicle, noting the unique sound of the starter motor, while @Schuler also expressed appreciation for the starter noise specifically in the 12-cylinder models. @HAPPY emphasized that the 2018 variation is the best year for G Wagons, merging classic design elements with crucial upgrades, adding that it stands out from newer models which feel more standard. @Progressivemtrs (The Seller) received positive comments regarding the vehicle's one-owner history, low mileage, and dealership maintenance, reinforcing its desirability in the auction market.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions about the vehicle's specifications and history. @tridi90245 inquired about the number of keys included, while @DKH8 and @Coop92 both asked for paint meter readings to assess the vehicle's condition. @MB54 sought clarification on the status of the factory warranty, and @Carlisle18 questioned the status of the wheels. @Progressivemtrs (The Seller) addressed these queries in responses, providing maintenance records and tire tread depths to assure potential buyers about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: However, some concerns were raised about the vehicle's appearance and condition. @KidAtlantic pointed out potential paint issues, suggesting that the vehicle might need detailing despite its low mileage, while @DKH8 noted the paint meter readings were lower than expected for a vehicle of this nature, indicating possible wear. Additionally, there were discussions about the optional brush guard; @Schuler acknowledged uncertainty about its presence, and there were hints of disappointment regarding the vehicle's cosmetic state.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors express excitement and appreciation for the SC430 vehicle. @GBachTR describes the vehicles as amazing and plans to monitor the listing closely. @Toyoter (The Seller) invites potential bidders to view the car in person and is proactive in responding to requests for close-up photos. @HyeTec praises the vehicle's unique electric convertible aspect and describes it as a beautiful example. @JaDawgPNW and @billyblyth also highlight positive aspects, including the car's color and dealer maintenance history, asserting that it still has much life left at 48K miles.
Neutral: Several comments provide factual information or neutral observations about the vehicle. @NMirasola suggests that the listing title should include 'Pebble Beach' to reflect the special trim. @Carole raises technical questions about the timing belt and maintenance history without taking a strong stance. @NNJ57 offers a perspective from long-term ownership, discussing the condition of the seats and suggesting possible improvements while remaining neutral. @Toyoter (The Seller) addresses these inquiries and clarifies details about tire conditions and upcoming photo updates.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns and criticisms regarding the vehicle's condition. @PMUZI points out the lack of replacement for critical parts like the timing belt and the overall appearance of the seats, suggesting a reduced value for the vehicle. Both @JayH58 and @mdcc3v note that the seats look worse than expected for a low-mileage car, leading to skepticism about the car's upkeep. @johnnymc52 questions the state of the speaker system, indicating that such components tend to deteriorate over time. Overall, there is a noticeable apprehension from these users regarding the vehicle's maintenance and longevity.
|
Ex–Alamo Airways & Hughes Tool Company 1956 Ford Thunderbird “Crash Wagon”
P6FH291216
Lot 226190
Dealer
 |
Positive: The 1956 Ford Thunderbird, known as the "Crockets Thunderbird," has received overwhelming praise for its beauty and historic significance. Commenters, including @Gunners4Life and @BigRed, highlighted its stunning aesthetics and the intriguing backstory that includes ownership by Howard Hughes and its function as a 'Crash Wagon' during a record-setting flight. The seller, @MSCLASSICCARSLLC, emphasized the car's excellent restoration and running condition, guiding potential buyers to appreciate its allure and the opportunity it represents. The enthusiasm within the community reflects a shared admiration for classic cars and their history, with hopes that this particular T-Bird will provide an enjoyable ownership experience.
Neutral: Several people engaged in a discussion around the car's restoration, noting its close proximity to concours condition while also acknowledging minor details that could be tweaked. @birddoc and @cmparrF40, among others, offered insight into specifics that might enhance its show quality, demonstrating a certain camaraderie among classic car enthusiasts who are keen to share their knowledge. The comments also touched upon the different perspectives on the significance of the car's celebrity connections, with @65-GTO suggesting that the historical merit outweighs celebrity status, while others reflected on the impact of its storied past.
Negative: Despite the glowing reviews, a few commenters expressed disappointment over the car's current condition post-restoration. @Mordizzle lamented that it should have been left in its working 'Crash Wagon' state as a display piece, rather than being restored to its showroom glory. Others suggested that retaining some signs of its historical use would provide authenticity and character. Comments from @Ranchero65 and @David_C. echoed similar sentiments, indicating a desire for the T-Bird to showcase its rugged, storied past.
|
 |
Positive: @ChamplainMotorcyclist commented positively on the vehicle, describing it as a nice driver with normal wear and tear for its age. They highlighted that it seems to have minimal rust, especially considering it has lived in the Southwest, which is advantageous for maintaining the car's body. They advised the seller to take photos of the trouble spots that serious buyers would check to further emphasize its rust-free condition and underscored that E30s are enjoyable to drive in pleasant weather.
Neutral: @jmb91e30 pointed out the car's age, mentioning that it is 37 years old. This statement reflects a neutral perspective, simply acknowledging the vehicle's considerable vintage without expressing a strong opinion on its condition or desirability.
Negative: @Soko121 inquired about potential issues such as water leaks in the soft top and whether crucial components like the cooling reservoir, water pump, and hoses had been replaced. They expressed concern by noting the existing water leak on the passenger side, which was confirmed by @jvaladez656 when responding to the comment. While acknowledging there were some maintenance issues, it indicates that serious problems could arise if these concerns aren't addressed.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the Audi RS5 Coupe, highlighting its stunning Navarra Blue color and describing it as drop-dead gorgeous. @DRAIDEZ1 noted the color's appeal over the more commonly seen Nardo Grey, while @Gotfuel echoed this sentiment, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. The walk-around and driving videos uploaded by @TheChadwickCollection showcased the car's impressive performance, with @Luckywilliam and @Chadaclark4 specifically requesting driving videos, emphasizing the importance of a proper demonstration of the vehicle's capabilities. Overall, the car is portrayed as a beautiful, well-maintained gem that any new owner would be lucky to possess.
Neutral: The comments provided some helpful insights into the history and condition of the vehicle. @Scott_in_TN inquired about the original parts of the car, and @tesoffice questioned its condition during recent hurricanes. Both questions were addressed by @TheChadwickCollection, emphasizing the car's safe storage and the owner's meticulous care. Commenter @jimmat clarified the ownership timeline, noting that he purchased the car new in July 2020. The seller's transparency regarding videos and modifications added to the discussion, helping potential bidders feel more informed about the vehicle without overselling it.
Negative: There were some concerns raised among the commenters regarding the car’s maintenance and its description. @jimmat pointed out some discrepancies in the listing about the downpipes and @bogeydrvr echoed this concern, seeking clarification on the exhaust system's details. Additionally, @BPL1999 requested a closer look at the carpet condition under the mats and raised questions about possible damage to the front splitter. Such inquiries indicate some hesitation from bidders about the car's condition, though @TheChadwickCollection responded promptly to provide reassurances, albeit the initial questions reflect some skepticism from potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Comments on the vehicle showcase a strong admiration for its design and functionality. @PhilO mentions the interesting modifications, expressing excitement about the riding experience. @LarryP shares a sentimental connection to a similar model, emphasizing the bike's impact on his long-standing passion for motorcycles and the friendships formed over the years. @rexfox commends the craftsmanship and exhaust choice, highlighting how well it sounds, which adds to the bike's appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters provide insights about the bike's mechanical aspects and potential improvements. @Fasted60 points out some noticeable cosmetic issues, like dents and scratches, while requesting additional photos of the tail lights. @Jamesangle shares a personal experience with how reliably the bike starts, adding to its reputation for being user-friendly. @MCTECH suggests minor enhancements, such as adding valve stem caps, reflecting a practical viewpoint on the bike's condition.
Negative: Critiques include concerns about missing components and build quality. @thevyris highlights a crucial issue with a missing nut to secure the engine to the frame, suggesting that building the bike could be done at a lower cost. @JimConnelley raises a question about riding without an air filter, hinting at potential performance issues. These comments suggest that while the bike has positive features, there are significant areas for improvement that prospective buyers should consider.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle for its stunning aesthetics and impressive features. @SAABNUTT described it as a 'sexy wagon' with high demand expected in the bidding process, indicating strong appeal. @Matring (The Seller) has highlighted the car's good maintenance history and options, which further enhances its desirability. @Hyjalik noted the seller's commitment to keeping the vehicle in top condition, suggesting it would be a fantastic purchase for any buyer. The car's performance and versatility have also drawn compliments, with @RE1 and @HAPPY expressing their admiration for its driving characteristics and functionality.
Neutral: Several comments reflect curiosity and requests for more information rather than strong opinions. @Idy-ho and @FesterSlamstone asked about interior details like the glass condition and technology features, showing a keen interest in the specifics of the car. @Cwbartholome also shared concerns about family needs regarding space, highlighting that while the car is considered luxurious, practical considerations matter too. Additionally, @Metring (The Seller) provided clarification on various details, including warranty specifics and specifications of additional features, demonstrating a willingness to engage with potential bidders.
Negative: While the overall reception was favorable, concerns about the vehicle’s condition, specifically regarding the window tint, surfaced among commenters. @Metring (The Seller) acknowledged the potential presence of scratches and indicated that the tint might need replacing, which worried several users like @Longforlineup and @Cwbartholome. @silverpass's inquiry about whether it had been smoked in also pointed towards common buyer anxieties concerning previous ownership. Additionally, queries about mechanical issues and warranty coverage from users like @CarlinKit and @coveside suggested that transparency about the car's history is essential for building trust.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its uniqueness and legacy within the 24 Hours of Lemons racing community. @wwbg highlighted its pristine example despite some visible corrosion, while @Gary_T1 expressed disbelief that there are others like this one to race against. Commenters like @philacarguy admired the impressive wiring and the dual gauge clusters, emphasizing that the car embodies ingenuity with its twin-engine setup. @Dub-Bub remarked on the car's legendary status among Lemons judges, noting it won class B in Colorado, and @pugwonk described it as 'Lemons royalty,' suggesting that its reputation precedes it in the racing world.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the logistical aspects of bidding and racing the vehicle. @Cryobrad54 mentioned that the opening bid reflects reality, and @philacarguy noted that the Lemons series has a $500 max investment rule, establishing natural limits for bidding. Other commenters, including @DeDub and @badnews74, pointed out the complexities of the bidding process and how the 'spirit of the $500 rule' is often upheld more through the community's understanding than strict enforcement. As @Hatchtopia described, the driving experience can vary depending on whether both engines are running, which also affects handling and performance expectations.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's state and potential hurdles for prospective buyers. @svatem humorously suggested that buyers should 'Bring a Tow Truck,' indicating possible reliability issues. @natew51 reacted with disbelief at the vehicle's peculiar twin-engine design, calling it a 'Frankenstein' creation, and @Wetwillyskate criticized the departure from the original $500 car cap, reflecting a nostalgia for the past racing ethos. Additionally, @Gary_T1 jokingly described Toyota's interest in the vehicle as a quirky luxury model, which some commenters may interpret as implying the car's underlying absurdity amid its quirks.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's condition and appearance. @colbob, the seller, described his pleasant experience with the Alfa, noting its zero rust, fresh repaint, and great driving experience with the top down. Others, like @BloodyHell, highlighted the car's good value and expressed interest, wishing they could buy it. @freakinutz also appreciated the car's aesthetics, sharing that it looks very nice, particularly in black on black, while others praised the lack of corrosion and the overall presentation of the Spider.
Neutral: Comments indicated some curiosity about specific features and performance, with questions about the AC functionality, possible past paintwork, and mechanical history. @Russ inquired about the gearshift and AC efficiency, while others, such as @KSCHLOSBERG and @GeorgeAlfa3, sought clarification on the original paint and AC issues. @Psbergin10 raised points about discrepancies in the listing and past maintenance, highlighting an interest in the car’s earlier condition compared to its current state. @SpiderLuver specifically asked about differential servicing and noise, showing a balance of interest and caution.
Negative: While many comments were positive or neutral, there were some concerns reflected in the discussion. @billyblyth pointed out that the later iterations of Alfa Spiders focused more on comfort than pure driving experience, suggesting that some enthusiasts might be disappointed with the features like AC and power windows. @SDCR cautioned potential buyers that while the car appears clean, issues can still arise as it ages, especially regarding components like the AC. The mention of needing a strong driving rationale to buy a Spider for anything other than its pure driving experience also hinted at skepticism about restoration quality and the potential for repairs.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors have expressed an interest in the vehicle's fuel mileage, with @PonderTexan sharing their experience of achieving 20 mpg easily with a similar model. Users appreciate the unique configuration of the vehicle, particularly noting the LHD, diesel, manual, and A/C features that are highly sought after. @StevenAJ (The Seller) is engaged in addressing questions and is willing to provide a cold start video, which has garnered positive feedback from the community.
Neutral: Several users are inquiring about the vehicle's condition and specifics, including potential rust issues from @adrudives and concerns about the vehicle's repainting history. @MJB194 and @armansarkissian have raised questions regarding the import documentation and titling status. In addition, inquiries about the vehicle's functionality, like the A/C and light indicators, were made by @fjfhh4k34f and @Gilz240.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the possible respraying of the vehicle, with @Docdadd and @camp6ell expressing skepticism towards @StevenAJ (The Seller)'s assurance that there is no re-spray. @URW highlighted the poor quality of the painting job and indicated evidence of overspray, which contributes to doubts regarding the seller's reliability. The lack of installed A/C has also drawn some disappointment among commenters, particularly from @Junkmantx who sought clarification on the vehicle's features.
|
 |
Positive: @deutschland_dan praised the stunning refurbishment of the vehicle, expressing hope it finds a loving home. @overlandish shared a nostalgic story about his grandmother driving a similar vehicle, emphasizing its charm and wishing good luck on the auction. @Vtec4ever called it one of the coolest things he has ever seen, while @mrhemi426 reflected fondly on his experiences with a similar truck he owned, commenting on the joys and memories it brought him. @GLWTA expressed intent to watch the auction with nostalgia, while @fullmeister complimented the seller on the truck's rarity and asked several insightful questions about its features, showcasing appreciation for its history.
Neutral: @bcall327 (The Seller) addressed several inquiries, including clarifying the images, such as Photo 178 showing the spare tire. The seller also provided thorough explanations about potential leaks from the rear differential and PTO, suggesting that over time and with proper oil management, any issues could be minimized. He also mentioned the truck’s age and its performance, indicating that it runs great despite being 74 years old. @rogerhayden noted the extensive restoration of the vehicle and appreciated the attention to wiring, waterproofing, and other critical components. @kgabsoh requested details about the transfer case levers and interior features, demonstrating curiosity about the truck's mechanics.
Negative: Some comments indicate concerns regarding specific aspects of the truck. @Badasscarguy13 questioned whether the wiring had been updated and inquired about the fuse box's location. @fullmeister raised concerns regarding missing parts for the winch and tools, questioning how easy it would be to add them. Additionally, comments about the potential for oil leaks highlighted uncertainty among prospective buyers, with @kgabsoh asking about the horn's functionality and inspections, suggesting anxiety over the vehicle's usability for practical purposes. Overall, while the enthusiasm for the vehicle is clear, there are points of caution noted by commenters.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle for its design and luxury features. @heywood mentioned a liking for the incorporated door handles, while @zabaroptik labeled it as one of the best-looking cars designed by Ford. @FA20FTW described it as incredibly comfortable with tons of power, emphasizing its quiet and sleek design. @dirkrowdies shared their personal experience owning a similar model, describing it as a wonderful full-size sedan comparable to luxury brands like Jaguar and BMW, noting its quickness, refinement, and spaciousness.
Neutral: @aegmotorsports provided detailed information about the vehicle's features, including the high-end Revel Ultima audio system and the SYNC 3 infotainment technology, which includes an 8-inch touchscreen and compatibility with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. They also highlighted additional luxury packages and specs, such as the twin-turbocharged V6 engine and various comfort features. The seller welcomed questions from potential buyers and assured that they would provide additional videos and details soon.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns or preferences that may detract from the overall appeal of the vehicle. @FA20FTW mentioned that while the car is superb, they noted it was mired by Ford's recent reliability issues. @Elbow expressed a preference for a bigger naturally aspirated engine over the current configuration, suggesting potential reservations about its performance. Additionally, @rbbev stated that they would buy the car if it weren't for the color, indicating a limitation in their interest.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlight the beauty and desirability of the 2008 Jaguar XK, with users like @R_Sheridan and @tabutler3 praising its stunning appearance and unique color. @David993S notes the pleasure of driving this model, particularly valuing the reliability of the 4.2 engine, which is a significant aspect for prospective buyers. @GulfStreamMotorCars emphasizes that the car has been meticulously maintained, stating it boasts all original paint and is in superb condition, making it one of the finest examples from this generation of Jaguars.
Neutral: Comments from users such as @vmaxie22 and @Roverfreak inquire about service records and the number of keys, showcasing potential buyers' interest in the vehicle's history and completeness. @iampatrick requested information about shipping options to Charlotte, North Carolina, while @Snowhill raised questions about potential minor flaws like stone chips and wheel curb rashes. The seller responded promptly, providing the necessary details and addressing concerns about the functioning of the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the long gap in the vehicle's service history, particularly by @2001lightning, who pointed out an 8-year period without reported maintenance. Some users also expressed frustrations with the BAT auction platform, with @R_Sheridan and @Nbeach48 commenting on security issues and technical glitches with the website. Additionally, @Hamminkway inquired about the performance of window switches, hinting at concerns regarding the older car's reliability, although the seller reassured that there were no issues present.
|
 |
Positive: @a990dna expresses enthusiasm for the rare '72 Chevelle with an L48 engine, recalling his own positive experiences with the same engine in his 1969 Chevelle. @RenegadeRoller highlights various appealing features of the car, such as the rebuilt manual transmission, attractive color scheme, and overall vibe of the Chevelle Malibu SS. @Jeepers243 appreciates the well-optioned original L48 configuration of the car, emphasizing the fun driving experience and reliability of the smaller engine.
Neutral: @ssterry discusses the unique combinations of options available for the Chevelle, noting that while many L48 Chevelles exist, those with specific configurations like the M20 transmission and RPO Z15 are less common. The comments reveal an interest in the history and documentation of these vehicles, including a request to verify details about the transmission. @CarbonandCobalt (The Seller) provides insights into the car's condition, past ownership, and original components, which adds to the overall understanding of this classic car's value and story.
Negative: @hairyolds mentions concerns about the costs of reviving vintage vehicles, suggesting that the expenses associated with getting this Chevelle roadworthy might surpass its market value. @dkornguth shares agreement on the cost-to-value stigma relating to classic cars, reflecting a sentiment that many enthusiasts face when investing in restoration. @HotDoug mentions sinking significant funds into his own vehicle, which may not hold comparable value, and this highlights the financial challenges inherent in classic car ownership.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the truck as a "handsome beast" and expressed excitement about it, saying, "Very cool – GLWTA!" @GeorgeSalcedo praised the truck as "Awesome" and was interested in whether the firefighting equipment was functional. @Cammergalaxie shared their positive experience owning a similar low-mile truck and noted the availability of traction tires, identifying a specific supplier for those looking to buy the tires, indicating a vibrant community of enthusiasts around this vehicle. @Sandrider123, as the seller, confirmed the availability of 16.5" tires, suggesting that enthusiasts could find replacements without too much trouble.
Neutral: @Middler89 confirmed the availability of 16.5" tires, while @Dp454so asked for clarification on whether the truck was a one-ton or 3/4 ton truck. @Wyobasque inquired about the steel water tank and the potential for rust, indicating that some potential owners may be concerned about the condition of the vehicle. @911wagon expressed curiosity about the various equipment on the truck and asked several technical questions regarding the purpose of features like the gas heater and radio frequencies. This demonstrates that while there is interest in the truck, potential buyers are also looking for specific information to assess its suitability for their needs.
Negative: There were mixed signals regarding the functionality of the firefighting equipment. @Sandrider123 mentioned it hasn't been tested or certified since 2021, raising potential concerns about its reliability. @Wickenburg123 corrected a misunderstanding by stating there is no water tank, indicating that this is a chemical fire truck instead. This may come as a disappointment to potential buyers expecting a traditional fire truck setup, suggesting that some may find the vehicle's specifications or current condition less than ideal.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received praise for its sick build, amazing sound, and great color. Many commenters, including @Bschurr and @Sledhead36, expressed their excitement about the car's aesthetics and performance, especially highlighting the enjoyable burnout video shared by the seller, @FOXTAIL. Comments like those from @Mcj4250 noted that a lot of work has already been done on the car, allowing potential buyers to customize it further, while @HeathBurger appreciated the fun driving experience it promises. Enthusiasts like @69classix expressed admiration for the potential enjoyment the car provides, while others like @JoeSketti noted that the car is being presented honestly and should attract serious bids.
Neutral: Some commentators raised questions and concerns about specific features and modifications. @Samzam2 asked about the engine's origin, while @nonuniform mentioned possible corners cut during the build, suggesting the car might have been a show car. The lack of a parking brake was also a frequent topic, with several users, including @RaiderSmiley and @mcj4250, questioning its practicality. @Gycgkb5 inquired about modifications to the suspension, and @An_architect sought details about the practicality of adding an A/C kit, noting the original setup might still accommodate one. These comments indicate a focus on the vehicle's functional aspects and room for upgrades.
Negative: Several comments expressed concern over the car's lack of essential features such as heat, A/C, and an emergency brake. @Shift_Happens64 pointed out that the absence of these items could be significant drawbacks, echoed by @Sledhead36, who shared reservations about living in a hot climate without AC. Furthermore, @Deman1032 remarked that while the cold start issue was frequently brought up, the focus on the e-brake was more practical. @Soundguy reiterated the importance of heat and AC in warmer regions, showing that the lack of these amenities could deter potential bidders. Overall, the conversations highlighted some significant practical shortcomings that affected perceptions of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commentors express strong affection for the vehicle, highlighting its comfort, nostalgic appeal, and impressive reliability. @Myoldcut admires the seats, while @JAY-Z describes it as a 'brand new Retro Regal.' @expletive praises the car's features, noting it as a 'sweetheart' and the best road car ever, indicating a deep appreciation for its driving experience. @Y2KRides (The Seller) emphasizes the seating comfort and nostalgic feel of the car, celebrating it as a 'literal time capsule ready to be shared with someone new.' @emanrace reminisces about selling similar vehicles and agrees on their comfort and fun driving experience.
Neutral: Several users request additional information or discuss specific details regarding the vehicle. @treetrimmer asks for date codes from the tires and service records, while @MARTY_ROTH inquires about the A/C system. @TERRYM shares insights about vehicle options and similar cars they own, indicating a knowledgeable interest in this type of vehicle. @Manywheels59 appreciates the wider context of Buick's engineering, providing historical context about the model's reliability and performance, which builds on the conversation about admirable design and craftsmanship in older vehicles.
Negative: Some comments reflect disappointment or concern about the vehicle's age or condition. @Craven remarks that had the car more mileage, it would be a better fit for a family, indicating a thought that the car may not be suitable for all buyers. @RWD-FTW humorously critiques the car's potential without the supercharged version, while @Moepoe humorously identifies it as an 'old guy's car' due to superficial characteristics. @cj11 notes the rarity of the vehicles in circulation, hinting at a lost presence of these cars in the streets and pointing out that many have succumbed to rust, suggesting potential concerns about longevity and maintenance for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlight the vehicle's appealing features and desirable specifications. @radcrujones expresses love for the vehicle, indicating satisfaction with its overall condition and features. @Grandpa007 praises the reliability of its Tiptronic transmission, referring to it as virtually bulletproof and cheaper to maintain than a manual. @IrishWhiskey also validates the durability of the TIP transmission, affirming its robustness and affordability for refurbishment, which adds to the vehicle's positive reputation. Overall, the car is recognized as a great looking option with good specifications that appeal to a range of buyers.
Neutral: Comments from @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) outline the dealership's commitment to transparency and customer service, inviting potential buyers to inspect the vehicle and address any logistical concerns. The seller also responds to inquiries about the car's condition, mentioning minor blemishes on the boot lid and assuring bidders that the engine operates well. @jld3601q and @Flybyfaith request additional information regarding the vehicle's cosmetic and functional features, further emphasizing the need for clarity on aspects such as exterior blemishes and interior functionality. This creates a constructive dialogue around the vehicle's specifics, which is essential for potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns are raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly around rust and surface blemishes. @emonomics asks for more context on the visible rust, with @swb911s acknowledging that surface corrosion is unattractive but not structural, pointing out the downside of winter driving in Atlantic areas. Additionally, @Flybyfaith mentions concerns regarding the PCCM buttons not responding and requests a demonstration to verify functionality. The overall sentiment reflects a cautious approach from potential buyers, urging thorough inspections and clarifications on various vehicle aspects to ensure confidence before bidding.
|
 |
Positive: @Sam_K finds the car to look like a ton of fun, while @Jaymag87, the seller, expresses excitement about listing the car and receiving feedback. He shares details about the build and drives it well in city and freeway situations. @Dr.Mancini appreciates the driving videos and believes the car is a cool build deserving of enhancements, while @iliasbeshimov expresses a desire for the build, finding it fun.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Papa350 and @g8rjimbo, request driving videos to more thoroughly understand the vehicle's dynamics. @Papa350 inquires about the choice of automatic transmission, acknowledging that it drives well in traffic but wonders about the decision. The seller explains the car is a work in progress and responds to inquiries about the condition of various parts of the vehicle, including the heater and emission system.
Negative: However, not all feedback is positive, as several commenters like @auditrackspeed and @Big_DaddyRL criticize the automatic transmission, which they refer to as a 'slush box', expressing disappointment over the lack of a manual option. @BrokeJoke wonders if the term 'slush box' refers to an automatic, highlighting some negativity towards the transmission choice overall. @Tognot points out the California emissions issue, suggesting it makes the car difficult to sell to in-state buyers, emphasizing potential regulatory problems.
|
 |
Positive: @Ricky88 praises the vehicle as beautiful, while @Versangetryx describes it as a fantastic looking beast and expresses a desire to hear the exhaust with its changed components. @GDogg is impressed as well, calling the S63 Coupe gorgeous and wishing the seller the best of luck. The vehicle's aesthetics are generally well-received, emphasizing an appealing appearance that has caught the attention of several commenters.
Neutral: @kavehk (The Seller) provides clarification on the vehicle's condition, stating that all tires are in good shape with the rear ones at about 7/32 depth, and that the windshield chip has filled in since the previous pictures were taken. Additionally, the seller mentions that they will post videos of the cold start and drive soon, and that the vehicle is equipped with an R1 package that includes a full stainless steel exhaust, rated at 696 hp and 800 torque according to their information. There are questions regarding the horsepower specifics and whether the chrome trim is painted or filmed, all of which the seller responds to in a straightforward manner.
Negative: On the downside, @BoltonBlue raises concerns about the suspension components, pointing out noticeable weather surface cracking and suggesting that the listing may have copied technical terms without full understanding. This comment raises alarms about potential age-related failures, which could affect the vehicle's performance. Additionally, @pete.vanson inquires whether the vehicle has been smoked in, which adds a layer of uncertainty to its interior condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Dmoll1 shares their enthusiasm by stating they own a similar spec vehicle and absolutely loves it, believing the new owner will also be delighted. @vegastoburque calls the GT500 amazing, particularly fond of its color and stripes. @WVTrakPak mentions they just bought the same car with higher mileage at 2900, emphasizing how incredible these cars are. @Plywood222222 describes the vehicle as absolutely beautiful. @Tifosi appreciates the car's fantastic specifications and notes the additional GT500 parts included with the vehicle, showcasing the seller's attention to detail. @AutoCrazy hails the 2020 model as "Top of the food chain" and gorgeous overall.
Neutral: @UDrive (The Seller) introduces the listing, providing detailed information about the car's condition, history, and inviting potential buyers to reach out for questions, showcasing great transparency during the auction process. The seller also clarifies the features associated with "Golden Ticket" cars, ensuring interested parties have all necessary information. @Gpamoney requests a close-up of a specific area of the car to check for potential imperfections, showing a proactive interest in the vehicle's condition, while also inquiring about any service performed on the vehicle—which raises important points regarding long-term maintenance.
Negative: The discussion around service records reveals some concerns. @Gpamoney points out that only one service record exists and questions whether essential maintenance like oil and brake fluid changes have been performed, given the car's age. @Inthehighdesert counters by suggesting low-mileage modern vehicles may not require frequent fluid changes, while @TheFonzerelli argues for the necessity of regular maintenance for safety reasons, contributing to a debate about vehicle care practices. @Gpamoney expresses a strong intention to conduct a full fluid service upon acquiring the car, indicating a sense of unease regarding the vehicle's maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: The comments praising the vehicle highlight its beautiful condition and performance. @Flyingdago described it as a beautiful specimen with excellent balance, making it enjoyable to drive, especially on twisty roads. @LSU2020 admired the sensational paint and expressed eagerness about potentially owning such a remarkable car. The seller @SpecWerksLTD shared their pride in presenting this well-maintained 924S, emphasizing that it was kept in great condition by its original owner and is now ready for a new caretaker.
Neutral: Several comments focused on vehicle specifics, asking questions about mechanical details and cosmetic aspects. @Milage inquired about the odometer status, while @Alvir21852 wanted to know about the A/C conversion and its efficiency. @Landinfire pointed out some minor concerns regarding the panels' appearance in the photos. Additionally, @countryroads raised queries about dashboard cracks and differences in body panel alignment, reflecting a common interest in ensuring the car's quality.
Negative: Some commenters had concerns about the vehicle's condition. @Milage expressed doubts regarding the authenticity of the odometer reading and mentioned that the car was missing the Porsche engine of the '88 model. @bluejacket noted potential delamination in the rear hatch area, which could affect performance. @Pauldebhanna asked about the A/C system's functionality and headroom, suggesting a possible discomfort for taller drivers. Overall, while the vehicle has many appealing aspects, some uncertainties and areas for potential improvement were raised.
|
 |
Positive: @GTdreams praised the vehicle's beautiful color and described its engine as super reliable, highlighting the 6-speed transmission. @69_911e and @bhhumphrey both expressed admiration for the BMW Z4, noting its impressive design and the thoroughness of the listing, respectively. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, consistently received compliments regarding their responsiveness and the transparency of the auction process, with comments indicating a strong customer satisfaction rating.
Neutral: The seller, @Collectibleclassics, provided detailed answers to several inquiries about the vehicle's condition. @doorite1 questioned the comfort for taller drivers, which the seller addressed by confirming that a 6'2" driver fits comfortably. @Delfb1 sought information about potential issues such as leaks and routine maintenance, and the seller confirmed there were no leaks and that the oil change had been conducted recently. Additionally, @Valvechatter raised concerns about the mileage inconsistency on the CarFax report but later resolved an issue related to video playback.
Negative: @robsz06 expressed concern over existing dents in the vehicle, questioning whether they would be repaired. @Delfb1 was apprehensive about the absence of oil change records in the CarFax report, hinting at potential underlying issues. These negative comments reflect some unease about the vehicle's condition, despite the seller's attempts to provide reassurances.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the stunning beauty and remarkable condition of the vehicle. @CarDogThreePedals expresses admiration for the classic Mark IV, comparing it to notable cinematic appearances, while @Dake and @wingless appreciate its low mileage and pristine undercarriage. @67tbirdlover and @Competitioncars (The Seller) acknowledge the unique options featured in the Mark IV, such as factory dual exhaust and heated windshields, contributing to its desirability among collectors. Positive remarks also come from @buellwinkle, who fondly recalls their own experiences with the car and anticipates that the new owner will be thrilled with their purchase.
Neutral: Commenters discuss various features and address specific inquiries about the vehicle. @SatchyMoto engages with the seller regarding the navigation of images, while @hvar101 raises concerns about a potential oil leak, seeking clarification on its source. @Geoffdavis999 asks if all electrical components are operational, indicating interest in the car's functionality. Conversations between users reflect ongoing curiosity about the car's history, maintenance, and any mechanical issues, with the seller addressing questions transparently and providing additional details.
Negative: Concerns arise primarily regarding the potential for oil leaks and the age-related wear of mechanical parts. @hvar101 points out worries about an oil drip observed on the transmission bell housing, drawing from personal experience with similar issues. @Corveight also comments on a possible crack in the windshield and burnt paint. @CENTECEQUIPMENT reflects on the integrity of the seller, providing reassurance against misrepresentation, but acknowledges that some bidders might still feel hesitant about the vehicle's overall condition. These apprehensions emphasize the common challenges faced with older classic cars.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, praising its color and condition. @nexusautobrokers referred to the vehicle as 'Sexy', while @peanutbutterfordogs noted that the pictures showcase the car well. @Vremacs-BAT mentioned wanting it to complement their own '17 Silver one, which shows the car's appeal to collectors. @Mintcoimports described it as 'amazing' and @skylineshibe highlighted the impressive lighting and photography. Comments also emphasized that the vehicle is a 'clean slate' with great potential for modifications, which @Hermersberg elaborated on.
Neutral: Several comments raised questions about the vehicle's history and market dynamics. @idlebumski inquired whether the car was imported from Japan or New Zealand, indicating curiosity about its origins. @learning2 questioned why the car was previously for sale on BAT a year ago. @coltonwade noted the interesting market trends for these vehicles, particularly how many are expected to be listed soon. @tacyarg humorously declared their intent to acquire the vehicle as they expressed strong desire for it, while @WindyCity-Chris asked about dealership visibility for local buyers.
Negative: A few comments carried a skeptical tone, notably @learning2's inquiry about the motivations behind the vehicle's resale. This notion was echoed by a general sense of concern about the seller's intentions, as expressed by the same commentator. @Knocyourselfout expressed disappointment about the color choice, stating they would have bid significantly if the car were in bayside blue, suggesting some discontent with the car's aesthetic choice. Overall, the skepticism stems from concerns about resale motives and color preferences that did not align with every potential buyer.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's features and overall design. @StyleCars highlighted the sophisticated blend of performance and hybrid efficiency, noting the vehicle's smooth acceleration and luxury features like heated and ventilated seats, Bose surround-sound system, and expansive sunroof. Additionally, @Bavaria911 and @Mofrid received positive confirmation from the seller regarding the vehicle's towing capacities and the presence of two keys, which is a reassuring factor for potential bidders.
Neutral: Several inquiries from commenters focused on the technical specifications and current condition of the hybrid system, including questions about the battery's state of health, inspection reports, and capabilities like preheating and towing. @SVXRide and @Jcarven sought clarity on the vehicle's maintenance history and current performance metrics, including the electric-only range. @StyleCars responded affirmatively, stating that the inspection and relevant documentation will be shared once available, reflecting ongoing transparency regarding the car's condition and ongoing auction process.
Negative: Concerns were raised by a few commenters about the vehicle's battery range and potential emissions issues. @JTANDERSON03 questioned the vehicle's failure to pass emissions inspections multiple times, prompting the seller to explain the nature of the emissions testing and the vehicle's current status. @OldGuy1234 expressed uncertainty regarding the condition of the vehicle, specifically looking for any potential scratches or blemishes that may not be clear from the photos provided. The seller assured that they would check the vehicle's condition once it returned from service, reflecting the need for clarity amid uncertainty.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its timeless design and utility. @Trevelyan calls it a 'beaut of a timeless utilitarian classic', while @Sarki mentions its longevity, fun driving experience, and affordability in terms of ownership and insurance. @DVader appreciates its ruggedness and compact size, emphasizing it as a vehicle worth keeping. @joeveto appreciates its reliability and visibility, and @jeffward25 points out the rarity and unique color options of the vehicle, making it a 'true 1st gen classic'. The seller, @rmwcali, reinforces the positive sentiments by sharing the car's history, including its well-maintained condition and impressive features like the new clutch and cold AC.
Neutral: Several comments express curiosity about the vehicle's maintenance history and specific features. @carlivar and @tko406 inquire about the timing belt and its replacement status, while @gassymagee asks for information regarding any potential accidents from the Carfax report. @bringatrailer mentions that the listing will comply with the California smog check for buyers from that state, which @bforbesut appreciates, raising questions about any relevant documentation. @David_P and others share their experiences driving manual versions, noting that these models are generally enjoyable, especially given the 5-speed transmission.
Negative: Concerns are mostly centered around the condition of the vehicle and lacking information on maintenance records. @KROD critiques the linking of unrelated articles by the listing platform, reflecting disappointment in perceived quality. @Deeezy23 and @robt98116 raise worries about visible rust and unusual odors, but @rmwcali responds, assuring them of the vehicle's sound condition. Additionally, @Ptmn1 comments skeptically about @Sarki's insurance coverage, hinting at issues with insuring older models. The seller does acknowledge minor cosmetic flaws, including scratches and surface rust, which has led to some caution among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The auction for the 300 TDI Defender 110 is generating excitement, with @ApexAutoVault (The Seller) highlighting the vehicle's interesting history and robust performance. The truck is powered by a well-maintained 300 TDI engine with a smooth-shifting 5-speed manual gearbox. It has been reliable enough for a 400-500 mile road trip through the Middle East and Europe, showcasing its adventurous spirit. Commenters like @wiggleattack appreciate the unique rear window cages, enhancing the vehicle's rugged appearance, while @executivemotorsports shows interest in the removable wooden crate, adding to the truck's utility and aesthetic charm.
Neutral: Several adjustments and repairs are suggested for the Defender. @ApexAutoVault (The Seller) acknowledges the need for an exhaust manifold replacement as a priority, alongside minor fixes like power window functionality and interior cleanliness. @kurtandkris expresses a desire for closer inspection and inquiries about the absence of rear seats, while @Tjim01 requests a driving video to assess the vehicle's performance further. @Qbailey75 is curious about the repainting history, and @dmnmkmcm5 wants to confirm the air conditioning's effectiveness, indicating a desire for transparency and information about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Despite its strengths, the Defender isn't without issues. @kurtandkris notes visible rust and bubbling on the driver door, raising concerns about the vehicle's overall condition. @WAGONBOYTD warns that the exhaust manifold can be an expensive fix, particularly if rusted bolts complicate the repair process. The seller addresses this concern, stating that quotes for the repair are around $1k, and explains the previous owner's lack of interest in addressing these issues. While many appreciate the seller's transparency, concerns about the vehicle's long-term reliability and restoration necessities persist.
|
 |
Positive: @Steve305 mentioned that buying this vehicle is akin to purchasing a classic owned by a famous person, thereby adding to its charm and allure. @Dollycat3 admired the beauty of the SL and expressed appreciation for the humor brought by Dick Martin and Dan Rowan on their show, indicating that the car holds nostalgic value for some. @Kimbossible (The Seller) highlighted the car's impressive documentation and condition, boasting new soft top and upholstery, which builds confidence in potential buyers about the vehicle's care and value.
Neutral: Several comments from users like @schigh and @CarFoolLane acknowledged the car's connection to Dick Martin, while others, like @macarbon_johnnyb, reflected on their unfamiliarity with the celebrity, indicating mixed levels of engagement with the car's history. @fallfork23 raised practical questions regarding the vehicle's condition, focusing on mechanical aspects like the rear wheel's bent status and HVAC operations, which underscores the balance of interest and concern surrounding the car's usability.
Negative: @macarbon_johnnyb questioned the seller's claim about the car being one of the nicer 560s on BAT, calling it a driver-level vehicle with visible wear. @mayart pointed out potential discrepancies in the condition of the upholstery and paint, suggesting that these concerns might detract from the car’s appeal. Overall, comments from users reflect skepticism regarding the vehicle's presentation, with critiques on cosmetic and functional aspects leading to a perception that it may need more attention than initially advertised.
|
 |
Positive: The comments contain numerous positive remarks about the vehicle, notably the performance and reliability of the 5.0 Jaguar and Land Rover engines. @Micahs, the seller, expresses confidence in their vehicles, stating they primarily sell dealer-serviced models with a solid reputation for running well. Commenters like @sbroadster505 appreciate the L322 model, citing personal experience and acknowledging the appeal of these vehicles. Many participants recognize that while certain maintenance will eventually be necessary, the overall sentiment about the vehicle's driving experience and value remains high.
Neutral: Several comments fall into a neutral category, focusing on aspects that are neither fully positive nor negative. Discussion points include inquiries about the service history and mechanical condition from users like @CAMPTX and @Jcuba, as well as clarifications about timing chain and coolant pipe issues. @NtrSandman mentions that while they have had to perform maintenance on timing chains and pipes around the 100k-130k mileage mark, this varies by vehicle. The presence of fees associated with the sale, mentioned by @Mrhoppy, garnered a mix of responses, contributing to an ongoing conversation without clear consensus.
Negative: Negative comments predominantly highlight concerns surrounding the vehicle's timing chains and coolant pipes, with users like @3Kees and @NtrSandman elaborating on the design flaws in these components. @3Kees points out historical lawsuits related to these issues, emphasizing the inevitability of repairs for many vehicle owners. The sentiment from some users suggests that while the L322 is a fantastic vehicle overall, prospective buyers should be aware of potential high repair costs associated with these common issues, which could deter buyers worried about future maintenance expenses.
|
 |
Positive: @davidb72 describes the BMW Z4 as a 'sexy car' and praises the design as one of the few successes by Chris Bangle. @Dspoljaric echoes this sentiment, highlighting the car's aesthetics including the color combination and the fact that it has a manual transmission, which adds to its appeal. @ppointer appreciates the driving videos produced for the auction and notes the attractiveness of the car's red interior. @JGraham shares that only 828 e86 3.0L 6-speed coupes were built for the U.S., making this car a rare find, and emphasizes its enjoyable driving experience, especially with the legendary naturally aspirated inline six-cylinder engine.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) introduces the auction highlighting their reputable business and commitment to quality transactions. They mention that inspections are welcome and detail their logistical support for potential buyers. Comments also include discussions about the wheels, with @dsp959 questioning if they are aftermarket and @valveguy confirming they are BMW Style 125 wheels available as dealer-installed options. There is a conversation about whether the car has been smoked in, to which @Collectibleclassics reassures that there are no strange odors, and they respond positively to various inquiries from other commenters regarding the car's condition and history.
Negative: @SteveSylvester points out a sagging headliner, which @Collectibleclassics acknowledges and promises to fix at their expense before shipping the vehicle. @AnotherSlowpoke raises concerns about the maintenance of the VANOS system and asks about potential oil leaks, while @Craig66 expresses uncertainty about known issues in this generation of BMWs. @Scatman questions the trunk space in relation to golf clubs, suggesting a practical concern. However, @valveguy and @Collectibleclassics provide reassurances about the vehicle's current maintenance status and reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @Rbe8000 shared a positive experience as a former owner of the car, noting their regret over selling it but praising its performance and reliability, stating they loved driving the vehicle and even selling it for a profit. @Euro_Classica provided engaging and promotional content, sharing a driving video and a cold start video that seems to have impressed potential buyers. Commenters like @Rocketman63 expressed eagerness to bid on the vehicle, showing interest in the positive aspects shared by the seller and previous owner.
Neutral: Commenters @zoltan and @Mica44 asked clarifying questions about the car's condition, including inquiries on the headliner, suspension functionality, tire conditions, and the operation of electronics, which highlights a practical interest in its performance rather than purely aesthetic or performance appreciation. @tedmurf raised concerns regarding unclear pictures of potential damage to the front bumper and cleanliness of the interior, indicating that while the car seems intriguing, there are details needing verification before purchasing.
Negative: A few commenters expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition. @Rickybean and @SimonTemplarVA brought up concerns regarding the paint's state, potential minor damage, and mechanical issues such as fluid leaks, history of smoking in the car, and service records. Further, @Mica44 shared a video from four years prior displaying the headliner in better condition than its current state, prompting questions about its deterioration and overall maintenance history. This thread of doubt reflects a cautious approach from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's true condition.
|
 |
Positive: The car has received several compliments for its design and performance. @tourdotc praised the vehicle's unique options, such as the grey side skirts and yellow stitching on the black interior, noting it creates a distinct road presence. @threeducs3 highlighted the fantastic sound of the engine, expressing enthusiasm for the 400HP power output. The seller @scc1962 emphasized the car's exceptional condition, stating it has been well-maintained in California, with no signs of rust or wear, and that all electronics are functioning perfectly, which contributes to a smooth and enjoyable driving experience.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @JBS27 and @mduel86, pointed out inaccuracies in the auction listing, especially regarding engine specifications, questioning whether the car is AWD or RWD. @FordGuy01 and @tourdotc contributed to discussions about the car's powertrain while also raising concerns about missing service records and the representation of features like the sunroof type. The seller @scc1962 responded to these inquiries, agreeing to clarify the specifications and provide additional high-quality photos, demonstrating a willingness to engage with potential buyers and ensure transparency.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the lack of detailed service history and the authenticity of the auction listing. Commenters like @JBS27 and @Rick968 expressed disappointment over the missing comprehensive service records, questioning maintenance practices. @tourdotc criticized the quality of the photos showing the vehicle’s headlights, indicating they fail to demonstrate the DRL functionality clearly, which could be a concern for potential buyers. There were also mentions of common issues related to the model, like the Y coolant pipe, with @chrissbee77 inquiring about its replacement history, to which @scc1962 assured that no problems had been detected.
|
 |
Positive: @Thomasgentle (The Seller) provided assurance regarding the vehicle's suspension, stating it has been well-maintained and driven for two years since the replacement of necessary parts. Additionally, he mentioned that brand new tires have been installed, ensuring a good driving experience. Furthermore, he responded promptly to inquiries by agreeing to upload a driving video demonstrating the vehicle's stability on the highway, which adds transparency and confidence to potential buyers.
Neutral: Comments from users like @EnjoyOneLife and @BLRacer350 showed an interest in the vehicle's aesthetic features and condition, specifically asking about the front bumper's manufacturer and the reason behind the black door jambs paint. @Thomasgentle (The Seller) addressed these queries, indicating that the bumpers are from Road Armor and offered to provide closer pictures of the areas in concern to reassure buyers about the vehicle's state.
Negative: A potential concern was raised by @TGwjacod-akota who sought clarification regarding any potential issues from a past encounter with rocks that required replacement parts. There is also a question about the vehicle's oil consumption by @Captianmitch, indicating that there might be uncertainties regarding the engine's condition. @Thomasgentle (The Seller) has yet to address this specific inquiry, which leaves some concerns about the vehicle's performance unaddressed.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters have praised the beauty and elegance of the vehicle, particularly highlighting its Nocturne Blue color and stunning interior. @Dollycat3 expressed admiration by describing it as a 'beautiful Continental convertible,' and @Longmire45, despite not typically favoring the 1965 models, called this particular car a 'stunner.' Additionally, @Sunoco260 remarked on the car's driving pleasure when in good condition, reminiscing about their past ownership experience with a similar model.
Neutral: Comments regarding the mechanical and historical aspects of the car include questions about its low mileage of 300 miles over the last 26 years and its current non-operational status, as pointed out by @neilpierson25 and @ModelAkid. @NoniGordon, the seller, clarified that the car has been stored in a garage with other classics and was only used for short drives. Concerns about the convertible top's functionality and the presence of hydraulic parts are also noted by @BlueCT and @Sunoco260, who both suggest that videos demonstrating the top's operation and other features would be helpful.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's modifications, particularly the choice of Flowmaster mufflers, which some believed clashed with the car's elegant nature. @keith_k and @67tbirdlover both indicated that this vehicle should produce a more refined sound rather than one that is loud and attention-grabbing. Additionally, @BlueCT pointed out the complexities of the car's system concerning the power windows and top operation, stating that this model is known for its potential difficulties, casting doubt on whether this specific car is in good working order.
|
 |
Positive: @johnkritikos72 expressed excitement and intentions to bid on the vehicle, indicating a favorable first impression. @fabzfabz described the car as a beautiful 'little canyon carver' and shared a positive experience with their own similar model while wishing the seller luck with their sale. @veedub00 mentioned enjoying their own Turbo S vehicles and praised the condition of the car, emphasizing its fun driving experience and quality features like the seats and sound system. @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 commented on the car's unmatched wheels and the joy of seeing a local owner enjoying a similar model.
Neutral: @TedMac (The Seller) provided insights about the car's history, mentioning it was found at a Ford dealer and noting the presence of mouse nests, but reassured that the car drives, shifts, and stops nearly perfectly. He also responded to inquiries regarding the condition of the clutch and confirmed all components were functioning well. Other commenters like @Citabria98 shared similar experiences with previous vehicles, discussing the cleanup process of mouse nests and concluding that any odors would eventually dissipate.
Negative: @Rich1DDS questioned the extent of the mouse damage, wanting clarification about the affected areas and potential damages. @GovernmentWork asked if there were electrical issues caused by the mice, indicating concern about hidden problems that might arise from the mouse infestation. Concerns were raised that while the car was marketed as fun and enjoyable, the past mouse presence might imply potential longer-term maintenance issues that could impact the vehicle's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlight the impressive features of the vehicle, particularly praising the 300 inline six engine for its torque and performance. @Jdukem appreciated the use of the engine and specifically mentioned the Offenhauser manifold, while @Breezejammer expressed excitement about the unique build and engine choice. @SgtBeavis noted that some cars, like this one, naturally bring joy to their drivers, and @rofandofy remarked on the vehicle's potential speed due to its powerful engine.
Neutral: The discussion features some practical inquiries and clarifications about the vehicle's build timeline. @brakeservo questioned the specific timeframe in the early 2010s when the car was constructed, to which @BubbaGPZ1100 humorously speculated it could be between January and July. Additionally, @ifonlyicould expressed interest in hearing the engine's sound, prompting @conquestclassiccars (The Seller) to share an initial video of the T-Bucket and mention a forthcoming test drive video.
Negative: There are no notable criticisms or negative comments regarding the vehicle. The comments mainly focus on positive aspects or neutral observations without any dissent or complaints from users.
|
 |
Positive: @craZee noted that the vehicle's lightweight design, being under 1,400 lbs, should make it an enjoyable ride. @mwtcmi expressed excitement over its potential performance, suggesting it could easily compete in regional hill climbs. @CKKurtz found the vehicle visually appealing, calling it 'smokin' hot'. @spc_cwby praised the reliability and cost-effectiveness of these race cars compared to higher classes, noting they are quicker than F4 and easier on tires. @BLD1 shared positive personal experience with the K24 Honda engine, stating it runs well on pump gas and that parts availability was excellent.
Neutral: @Carsbythermal (The Seller) provided information about the previous ownership and the car's condition, stating it had not run for about seven years but was checked over in 2018 and was in good shape. The seller mentioned that one extra set of wheels and a car cover are included in the sale. @GLTL inquired about part availability for the Formula Lites car type, expressing concern over limited availability for FL15-specific parts. @sjcollias asked about the car's classification in SCCA events and commented on its performance metrics compared to other classes such as Formula Continental.
Negative: @STAddicott raised concerns about a potential leak indicated in a video, questioning when the car was last run on track and asking for details on engine condition. @GLTL remarked on the declining fields in racing events, suggesting this is detrimental to the future of open-wheel racing. @Richard expressed a pessimistic view about the potential lack of competitors, implying that there may not be enough people interested in racing these vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as a beauty and noting its high-end features. @Collectibleclassics provides reassurance about the car's condition, clarifying that the reported damage was primarily to the front bumper and asserting that the roof is in excellent shape. @CraZ8 highlights the spacious trunk, emphasizing its deceptive size and functionality, while @leftlane11 points out that this Lucid could be a fantastic value given its initial high price and outstanding reviews. @Phage appreciates the seller's transparency, particularly regarding the vehicle's blemishes, which fosters trust among potential buyers.
Neutral: There are questions raised about the vehicle's warranty validity and details concerning any accident history, with commenters like @byronrad and @mbz2000 seeking clarification. @59turner brings attention to the car's pricing and possible depreciation due to its damage history, while others inquire about the vehicle's features, such as the DreamDrive system and GPS capabilities. Comments also discuss the trunk size and usability, with @coup2516 and @bmwspyder providing varying perspectives, contributing to an understanding of the vehicle’s practical aspects.
Negative: Some commenters express skepticism regarding the car's value due to its accident history, like @1porsche_geek and @trwxvii, predicting potential low bidding prices. @59turner critiques the seller's comments about auction etiquette, perceiving them as inappropriate, and also noting that the car's features may not meet expectations. Additionally, @Aboxsrer424 points out the lack of visible features described in the listing, raising concerns about transparency in the auction details.
|
 |
Positive: @chad_everson reflects fondly on the vehicle, sharing that he initially hesitated to sell it and is even tempted to buy it back, highlighting its amazing nature. Various commenters like @e9er and @sir_keith agree, noting the car's appeal and suggesting that the vehicle looks even better in person than in photos. @sir_keith provides a detailed analysis, stating that the car's presentation is honest and solid despite some minor issues, praising the fresh paint job and the overall nice condition of the interior.
Neutral: The seller, @sclauto, provides thorough historical details about the car, explaining its journey from purchase as a graduation gift in 1988 to its extended period under a mechanics lien. The vehicle was not in extensive repairs during its downtime but gained scratches and paint damage from sitting outside in Hawaii, leading to its recent repaint. @chad_everson and others such as @Kronus share technical information regarding the car’s modifications, including an installed MAF conversion which adds to its character as a project vehicle.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the car's history and condition. @Eddyaoude questions the seller about the recent sale and the extensive repairs needed despite the low mileage. @Dtmdave also expresses skepticism regarding the necessity of a repaint, while @jeep2017 inquires about a noted oil leak, seeking further details. Additionally, @SkaiHues mentions how the car had been outside for a significant time, which leads to worries about potential corroding issues underneath the car, suggesting caution for interested buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors praised the vehicle for its cleanliness and overall condition. @sparky224 mentioned having seen the Yukon in person and described it as 'astonishingly clean.' @misterco appreciated the presentation of the truck and highlighted how well the seller addressed maintenance and problem areas. @esaabparts confirmed that the vehicle's interior smells excellent with no evidence of smoking and noted the absence of rust, crediting the low-salt usage in South Dakota where the vehicle is located. Many appear to view it as a good deal, with @Arutt330 noting it as a nice truck at a good price point and wishing the seller luck.
Neutral: @Jrb426 inquired if the vehicle had Bluetooth capabilities, to which @esaabparts clarified that while it lacked Bluetooth streaming for music, it did support hands-free calling. The vehicle's sound system, a Bose system, was noted to have good sound quality, and @esaabparts shared that one of the front door speakers had been replaced to eliminate a rattling issue. Further discussion included the vehicle's rear air shocks, with @misterco expressing concern over their longevity given their age, to which @esaabparts provided insights about the current state of the suspension and their methods of maintenance.
Negative: Concerns were raised about specific issues with the vehicle, such as the power-folding side mirrors not functioning properly. @Beight questioned if the issue had been diagnosed, leading @esaabparts to explain that it likely stemmed from mechanical failure of the plastic gears. Additionally, @M0REL pointed out that the steering wheel appeared slightly off-center in photographs, which @esaabparts attributed to the camera angle rather than an alignment problem. Overall, while there were positive comments, the mentioned issues raised questions about the vehicle's operational state.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed a generally positive sentiment towards the vehicle, particularly appreciating the decision to have leather seats instead of suede, as indicated by @vintagecarsandsuch. @Incognito74 highlighted that the owner had well cared for the Cadillac, relating it to their own experiences with vehicle maintenance. Furthermore, @Kirby2 reinforced this sentiment by declaring that the new owner would love the car, indicating a sense of anticipation among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions regarding specific aspects of the vehicle, such as trunk alignment and tire types. @beyerch inquired about the differences in seat materials and the condition of the trunk, while @Cdn043 requested clarification on the alignment issue, believing it might stem from previous repairs. Responses from the seller, @PassR, provided explanations, mentioning that the trunk had not been painted entirely and clarifying the tire situation, suggesting they hoped to address concerns satisfactorily.
Negative: Comments reflecting concerns about the vehicle's condition included questions about the trunk alignment, which was described as 'really bad' by @Cdn043, and worries about mismatched tires noted by @beyerch, leading to doubts about the car's maintenance. @ColoTom speculated that the underlying issue could be more significant than a simple alignment fix, pointing out potential additional costs. Other users raised points about small damage and glue residue visible in photos, which contributed to an overall skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition.
|
Twin-Turbocharged 2014 Lamborghini Gallardo LP570-4 Squadra Corse 6-Speed Conversion
ZHWGU7AJ2ELA13917
Lot 226224
Private Party
 |
Positive: Overall, many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, with several highlighting its impressive power and unique features. @rguy, @PnwAvant, and @JackVetter praise the aesthetics and performance modifications, showcasing the rarity and appeal of the Gallardo Squadra Corse. Additionally, @haveatrailer2 appreciates the build quality and notes the joy experienced during the car's use, further contributing to a positive perception of this supercar. @tiddy (The Seller) responds positively to inquiries about the vehicle, providing detailed technical specifications and dyno results, which enhances buyer confidence.
Neutral: A number of comments contain inquiries regarding technical details and components of the car without expressing strong opinions. @Cars4life89 questions the availability of a dyno sheet and power output, while @BATuser4334 and @Mcrandall316 seek clarification on modifications such as the driveline and suspension. @jpl101 and @theforce88 also request information regarding the vehicle's paint and specifications, signifying interest but lacking a persuasive stance for or against the car. @tiddy (The Seller) addresses these queries with clear responses, maintaining dialogue with prospective buyers.
Negative: Some comments bring up concerns regarding the vehicle's modifications and modifications history. @BATuser4334 points out potential discrepancies in the suspension being aftermarket and suggests inconsistencies in the seller's description. Additionally, @Speedhabit raises worries about the impact of aftermarket enhancements on future resale value, while @Mcrandall316 challenges the completeness of the undercarriage photos, reflecting apprehension about the seller's transparency. These criticisms highlight some hesitancies among potential buyers about the vehicle's modification history.
|
 |
Positive: The 1960 Lincoln Continental Convertible is being marketed by @lloyddon1, who emphasizes their strong reputation as a seller with over 150 transactions and a five-star review on Google, assuring potential buyers can bid with confidence. The vehicle has undergone extensive refurbishment, featuring a rebuilt engine, new paint, and a refreshed interior, highlighting its exceptional quality. Many commenters, such as @hr47cars and @Dollycat3, express admiration for the vehicle's design and beauty, noting its vintage charm and potential as a rare collectible. The seller encourages bidders to take advantage of the no-reserve auction, emphasizing it as an incredible opportunity to own a piece of automotive history.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a mix of curiosity and caution regarding the vehicle's condition and operation. @safarilang inquires about the functionality of the instruments and the clock, while @pwlovely asks for detailed information regarding any non-functional features, including the trunk lock and window controls. @badazxj expresses concern about the title and registration, particularly in relation to state inspections. Overall, there is a consensus that while the car has great potential, it requires some clarifications and confirmations from the seller to ensure buyers have all necessary information before bidding.
Negative: A number of comments underscore serious concerns about the vehicle's current issues. Commenters such as @Noisyboyz and @pwlovely highlight the non-operational convertible top, missing window switches, and other electrical problems, suggesting that these repairs could be costly. @gscharnagl mentions that the current bid may not reflect the potential expenses associated with the car's restoration, indicating uncertainty about its overall reliability. There's a sentiment among commenters that while the car has been significantly restored, it might still be seen as a project, and transparency regarding its condition is critical for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 1960 Volkswagen Beetle, highlighting its beauty and nostalgic appeal. @ClassicPromenade (The Seller) noted the vehicle's excellent restoration and maintenance, making it a joy to drive. @nucleonic remarked on the retention of unique features from that year, while @mick59 praised the car's classy appearance, suggesting it surpasses typical economy car aesthetics. Commenters like @PMB-BTR and @Mercuryman praised its functionality and beautiful design, indicating it is a standout example among early VWs. Overall, the consensus is that this Beetle is an exceptional specimen, appealing to enthusiasts and casual fans alike.
Neutral: Some comments focused on the specific features and condition of the vehicle, seeking clarification and more information. @cruzahome asked about its originality and details like mileage and upholstery, while @garagetoys inquired whether everything is functional and about shipping arrangements. @LouFifer and @Pfeil suggested contacting previous owners for insights on the car's provenance, which raised discussions about the importance of documentation in assessing value. Overall, the comments reflected a curiosity about the car's history and assurance of its quality, along with practical concerns related to potential purchase logistics.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns regarding the originality of the car's paint and the potential for hidden issues. @Kafer51 questioned the authenticity of the paint, pointing out the absence of grommets that typically indicate a repaint. Commenters like @Chrispc highlighted the need for better documentation on the vehicle's restoration, which could affect buyer confidence. Additionally, @zeres raised practical concerns about the vehicle's reliability and common issues faced by similar models. While most feedback was positive, these critical insights suggest a desire for more transparency about the car's restoration and long-term reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters have shown interest and enthusiasm about the vehicle, with @elly18 expressing curiosity over the rear end ratio being 4.30, which they found uncommon but are now learning more about. They appreciated the clarification provided by @2smotorcars, who confirmed the factory specs and provided insights on RPM at highway speed. The seller also addressed multiple questions about the vehicle’s condition and history, which demonstrates responsiveness and willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding specific details of the vehicle's specifications and condition. @H20Sun requested detailed photographs of the underside rocker panels and asked about the presence of wiring for communication equipment, which indicates a desire for thorough verification of the vehicle's past as an EMS unit. Additionally, @PWIDMAYER was concerned about a lien on the vehicle, which the seller clarified had been resolved, indicating transparency in the transaction process.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding potential issues with the vehicle, such as @MALE asking about tire date codes and any possible exhaust leaks or fluid seepage, which reflects a cautious approach from potential buyers. @zachbillington added uncertainty by suggesting the initial cold start video did not clearly show how smoothly the vehicle started, while @PWIDMAYER inquired about spark plugs, which adds further questions about the vehicle's mechanical integrity. Overall, these negative remarks highlight skepticism and the need for reassurance regarding the vehicle's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @MicahHale (The Seller) indicates that all repair work is documented with attached paperwork, and the vehicle has been driven less than 100 miles since the completion of the work. He mentions that the clutch was replaced alongside the engine rebuild, which is a positive sign for potential buyers. Furthermore, the tires have great tread, although they require balancing, and they were installed 10 years ago, suggesting they are still in reasonable condition despite their age.
Neutral: @kodibear asks for specific information about the vehicle's mileage since the engine rebuild in 2016, service records for various components, and the age of the tires, which shows a balanced interest in understanding the vehicle's maintenance history. Additionally, @Wylie702's inquiry about the engine specification and potential modifications suggests a curiosity about the vehicle's performance capabilities, while @gssas60 provides technical insight into the engine's head type, indicating that more work might be needed to enhance performance. These comments reflect a neutral tone, seeking clarity rather than expressing outright enthusiasm or dissatisfaction.
Negative: @Ted_P. expresses a strong aesthetic concern regarding the vehicle's color, stating that a potential buyer would need to 'REALLY like blue' to be interested, implying that the color may deter some potential bidders. Furthermore, @Wylie702's comment raises questions about the authenticity of the engine upgrades, which introduces doubt about the vehicle's selling points. The combined feedback hints at some skepticism regarding the vehicle’s overall appeal and value, given the uncertainty about its modifications and visual presentation.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, noting its impressive build quality and performance capabilities. @boaboyoz calls the 992 GT3 Cup a 'sexy beast' and praises its killer build, while @Dave_Car_Guy appreciates the informative responses provided by the seller. @BillRobertson (The Seller) underscores the vehicle's maintenance by Charlie Hayes Racing, further assuring potential buyers that the car is kept in top shape, which is relief for those watching the auction. Others, like @skonker, also highlight the wealth of information shared by both the seller and other contributors, emphasizing community knowledge and support that benefits all interested parties.
Neutral: Several comments inquire about the vehicle's history and maintenance, showing an interest in specifics like service records and modifications. @joesailor questions the engine and transmission's run time against the reported mileage, while others, like @centerlockmotorsports, ask for details such as spare parts availability and the history of maintenance. @CorsaSpeciale and @daytonars4 provide clarifications about engine rebuilds and the absence of features like ABS and traction control. These neutral inquiries reflect potential buyers' desire for transparency regarding what has been done with the car over its competitive life.
Negative: A few comments carry a more skeptical tone, questioning details and calculations regarding the vehicle's usage. @45series raises a concern about the mileage and expected maintenance costs, while @Dave_Car_Guy responds to potential issues raised in earlier comments, suggesting that the worries may stem from 'usual complainers.' Additionally, @Kstadt911 notes the tone of some comments as undermining the seller's credibility and the car's appeal, which could indicate some apprehension among bidders about fully trusting the provided information. Overall, there seems to be a mix of excitement and caution among commenters.
|
 |
Positive: @Momo84 expressed appreciation for the extended video of the engine running, indicating a positive view of the seller's responsiveness and the car's condition. @Flynmid90 described the vehicle as beautiful, showcasing admiration for the S2000. @johncipolla39 (The Seller) mentioned that the car is taken out at least once a week and still provides joy to drive after twenty years, reflecting confidence in the vehicle's performance and reliability.
Neutral: @Salfromjc asked for an indoor walk-around video, indicating a desire for more information without expressing strong opinions. @johncipolla39 (The Seller) responded positively regarding the clutch replacement five years ago, clarifying details about the repair history and providing insights into the mechanics involved. @jdayan inquired about the timing chain and paint, which led to further clarifications by the seller regarding the original components and care.
Negative: @Studedude pointed out that the Carfax report mentioned prior damage that was not highlighted in the listing summary, raising concerns about transparency. @Batfan2 noted the absence of an antenna for XM equipped vehicles, which could imply a concern for completeness. @2manywheels inquired about a missing VIN tag for the rear bumper, suggesting doubts about the car's history and modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @Premierautofl mentions that this 2018 Demon, finished in a rare Yellow Jacket color, is an exciting offering due to its low mileage and clean Carfax, highlighting its status as a one-owner vehicle. The seller expresses enthusiasm for the auction, stating that the car is a rare spec, making it a likely valuable investment for bidders. @badcad and @manofmanuals also add positive comments praising the build and color, creating a lively discussion about the vehicle's appeal. @BMW_Driver points out the rarity of the color and mileage as a justification for its value, despite the absence of the crate, suggesting that the crate can be acquired separately if needed.
Neutral: The conversation surrounding the crate reveals mixed feelings among potential bidders. @Hotrodmopar inquires about the after-sale items available, while @V10hooked and @Hockster express disappointment that the crate is not included. However, @THJimmy notes that some enthusiasts may not consider the missing crate a dealbreaker, particularly if racing is the objective. Meanwhile, @C_Engineer and @eduardo29 share curiosity and interest in the auction, suggesting they see value in the vehicle beyond the absence of the crate.
Negative: Several comments reflect concerns and disappointment regarding the missing crate and ECM, essential for unlocking the car's full potential power. @GaryCase and @oldjonny emphasize the importance of the crate for achieving the Demon’s advertised specs, with @99xracer criticizing the lack of clarity in the auction description regarding the missing PCM. @Dbergamy also highlights the negative impact of the crate's absence, suggesting the car's value may be diminished without it. @SpeedRider raises doubts about the auction's competitiveness in the current market, hinting at the possibility of another undervalued sale, with some bidders potentially distracted during the holiday season.
|
2,800-Mile 2023 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Coupe 3LZ 70th Anniversary Edition
1G1YF2D33P5700781
Lot 226161
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Oldwood points out the vehicle's unique features, including visible carbon fiber aero and ceramic brakes, which he believes might make it a better option compared to the stiffer suspension and Cup tires found in the Z07 variant. @Rpav agrees, emphasizing that cars should be enjoyed on everyday roads rather than just race tracks, suggesting that the current setup is indeed enjoyable for an average driver. Also, @Laborone, who is the seller, describes the car as a beautiful and well-cared-for supercar, reinforcing its aesthetic and maintenance appeal.
Neutral: @Vyper340 raises practical concerns about the car's modifications, noting that while it appears to have rock guards on the rear intakes, the lack of guards on the front remains unaddressed. @Crumpledsheetmetal expresses interest in a similar car but clarifies that the one they are considering is a newer model with fewer miles. This showcases the variety of options available in the market and the general curiosity about pricing and condition among potential buyers.
Negative: @manofmanuals discusses the decline in the car's market value, mentioning a significant drop from nearly 200k two years ago to its current standing, which may indicate a decreasing demand for the Z06. @APPLESAUCED_226 elaborates on this by analyzing market trends and the role of dealers in bidding, suggesting that the Z06 has faced challenges due to supply issues and marketing missteps. Additionally, @badcad humorously comments on the car's sinister appearance, calling for an exorcism, indicating a mixed or negative perception of its aesthetic among some viewers.
|
 |
Positive: Comments from @BrdyBids highlight the impressive specifications of the vehicle, particularly regarding the wheel setup and performance. @BrdyBids notes the wheel measurements with Apex Arc 8 wheels painted in meticulous detail, demonstrating a commitment to providing thorough information to potential buyers. Additionally, the performance potential is acknowledged, with @BrdyBids estimating the car to easily exceed 600+ whp, underscoring the vehicle's impressive capabilities and engineering excellence.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @JustinJohnson and @RMBschultz, engage with the seller by asking specific questions about the vehicle's specifications and performance metrics. @MrKD raised a query about the drivetrain options, which was addressed by @BrdyBids, confirming the car is indeed xDrive. This interaction shows that potential buyers are seeking clarity on the technical aspects of the vehicle, and the seller promptly corrected the listing as needed, reinforcing the importance of clear communication in a sale.
Negative: There is some confusion and concern regarding the vehicle's drivetrain, as raised by @MrKD, who pointed out inconsistencies in the listing about whether the car is all-wheel drive or rear-wheel drive. Such inconsistencies could potentially mislead potential buyers and disrupt confidence in the purchase. Furthermore, the lack of dyno sheets to confirm performance figures might leave some buyers questioning the validity of the performance claims made by the seller, as highlighted by @RMBschultz.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express enthusiasm about the vehicle, particularly its pristine condition and aesthetic appeal. @claudiaimel highlights that the car has received white glove treatment and is impeccable both inside and out, which excites potential buyers. @SenyForever refers to the car as a potential steal, indicating that many perceive it as a valuable opportunity. @64olds emphasizes the need for maintenance records, reflecting a sense of trust and assurance in the vehicle's upkeep.
Neutral: Commenters raise various inquiries about the vehicle's history and details, indicating a mix of curiosity and caution. @Bordeaux initially mentions the difficulty of confirming color and trim details but later provides information on where to find this data. @Eblesson expresses interest in the car's service records, particularly concerning high-ticket items like vacuum lines and suspension, which shows a desire for more transparency about the vehicle's history without implying any negative connotations.
Negative: Some participants express concern over the lack of detailed maintenance records and communication from the seller. User @rjb7266 calls into question the seller's response about the vehicle's maintenance history, noting a failure to address inquiries regarding specific service items. Additionally, despite @claudiaimel stating that maintenance records are available, there appears to be confusion about the documentation, as they admit only to having Carfax records. This inconsistency raises doubt among potential buyers about the vehicle's upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the impressive restoration efforts put into the vehicle, with @bfulgham and @BSteeleRVA praising the careful refurbishment and attention to detail, particularly regarding the stainless fuel lines and overall quality. @CalSoCal and @Fitzroya also express admiration for the work done, calling it a thing of beauty and commending the extensive frame-off restoration process that ensures the vehicle's superiority. @WAGONBOYTD acknowledges the unique upgrades and shared community pride in the vehicle's renovation, making it a sought-after model with significant emotional and aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a curiosity about the restoration process and modifications made during the refurbishment. @Mlbatson (The Seller) addresses inquiries about the restoration, explaining decisions made regarding the engine and components like the transmission upgrade. @2hecknback and @papohlen discuss specific aspects such as the spare mount needs and details like the rivets and springs, showcasing a community engaged in technical discussion rather than just aesthetic appreciation. Commenters like @G8r81 express interest in owning the vehicle but also note it's beyond their budget, reflecting a balanced view of desire and practicality.
Negative: Some commenters raise concerns regarding certain aspects of the refurbishment. @njnjnjnj questions why the vehicle is for sale so soon after an extensive restoration, suggesting a lack of commitment to the work put in. @Lforgue8 and @2hecknback point out potential issues like the upside-down front coil springs and the need for a swing-away spare mount, indicating oversight in the build. Additionally, @Gcb177 brings up an issue with the coolant gauge's accuracy, which @Mlbatson (The Seller) subsequently resolves, showing there were initial challenges that might cause apprehension for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning looks and features, such as @mans442 mentioning how incredible the white paint looks over the wheels. @fyanrudger compliments the car’s seating capacity for passengers, while @Tnbusiness71 admires its uniqueness, noting that it isn't just a want but a must-have vehicle. @stathios (The Seller) reflects with enthusiasm about the E63 AMG Wagon's specifications, asserting that this is a spectacular option for anyone in the market, especially with its low mileage and luxury features like the rear-facing seats and carbon fiber trim.
Neutral: Several comments touch on the vehicle's service history and maintenance costs, pointing out that the expenses might seem high, as per @pauliefein and @fyanrudger who discuss the costs at Georgica Services. @BlackBeard expresses concerns about potential issues with the engine and maintenance that may not have been documented, stressing the importance of thorough service records. @Jaybart and @Resi pose questions about the functionality of the keyless-go system and the vehicle’s strut conditions, seeking clarification from @stathios about specific maintenance tasks and parts.
Negative: On the less favorable side, some commenters, like @BlackBeard, question the adequacy of the maintenance records, particularly regarding critical components like head bolts. @pauliefein criticizes the high maintenance costs, claiming they resemble scams outside of the Hamptons. Additionally, @ShorelineSpotter remarks on the inconsistency in oil used during maintenance, implying negligence in service that could affect performance. Overall, concerns about the vehicle's long-term reliability and maintenance practices emerge, painting a picture of potential underlying issues.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments praise the vehicle for its overall condition and features. @cj11 notes that the wheels look great, even if they were not offered on the sedan version. @SAImports, the seller, highlights the thorough inspection of the car, emphasizing that it starts easily and drives well, confirming that it has been well-maintained with recent service completed, such as a new A/C compressor and oil change. The interior is noted to be exceptionally clean with only minor wear, indicating it has been cared for by a non-smoker. Additionally, @SAImports describes the car as a strong example of BMW’s final E93 hardtop convertible, making it appealing to enthusiasts.
Neutral: @SoGi inquires about whether the vehicle has a heated steering wheel, to which @SAImports responds that it does not. Other comments like @Punnzzells request for a video demonstrating the top operation and driving experience, showing an interest in more visual proof of the vehicle's condition. @sammytentoes asks about the vehicle's accident history and maintenance records, prompting the seller to clarify that the accident was minor and that service records are available. The discussion indicates that potential buyers are looking for transparency in the car's history and functionality.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding minor imperfections and a front bumper sag. @sammytentoes points out marks on the door and asks if these are paint damage or dirt, indicating a concern for the cosmetic quality. The seller acknowledges these imperfections and aims to have them checked out. Additionally, @sammytentoes’ repeated inquiries reflect a cautious approach, highlighting a level of scrutiny that potential buyers are applying to the listing altogether, with requests for clarification on any lingering odors or signs of previous smoking or pet ownership.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is receiving strong positive feedback for its stunning restoration and vibrant color. Commenters like @sfmonster23 express their admiration for the beauty of the bike, highlighting the 'intoxicating' color and calling it a 'damn near perfect bike.' @markkrial and @CorvetteMike also praise the bike, noting its bling effect and how it compares favorably to other models. The seller, @davethewave911, shares excitement about the restoration process and encourages potential buyers to appreciate the craftsmanship and details involved in the rebuild.
Neutral: Several comments provide neutral information regarding the bike's specifications and history. @Dgroff raises a query about the bike's on-road use, indicating some uncertainty around its registration status, which @davethewave911 clarifies. The seller mentions that the bike does not come with a current registration and title yet, aligning with the listing requirements on the platform. Additionally, @Doubledog and @CT70MAN discuss the bike's color, speculating it might resemble other shades used by Honda in the past but ultimately agree it's a unique and appealing hue.
Negative: There are few negative comments, with most feedback being overwhelmingly positive or neutral. However, @Dgroff's question does hint at some concerns regarding the bike's suitability for on-road use, while @Doubledog clarifies the color confusion, suggesting it may not match the traditional Honda candy gold. These conversations indicate some minor uncertainties but do not significantly detract from the overall positive sentiment surrounding the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @gmagno expressed strong enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its suitability for grassroots endurance racing. Commenting on past experiences, @gmagno praised the car's performance in corners and noted that it has several upgrades, including a valuable Rebello Racing motor, which they estimated to be worth $9000. They concluded that with a few minor adjustments, including updating the fuel cell and harness, the car could quickly return to the track, stating it would cost significantly more than the asking price to duplicate the car's current value today.
Neutral: @oaklandjester (The Seller) provided detailed responses to potential buyers' questions, confirming that the car could go the full two hours in an endurance race, and outlining the history of its usage in competitions. They addressed concerns about the vehicle's condition post-accident, clarifying that while it had been damaged, the frame rails were straight, and the suspension was fully adjustable. Several other commenters raised questions about the vehicle's specifications, including @RoadKingMike asking about fuel capacity, leading to discussions about technical aspects and race requirements.
Negative: @kkherman criticized the car's design, suggesting that it lost its original characteristics and could have been based on a more common model. @sccaracer31 raised concerns about the vehicle's condition following its incident, particularly regarding the suspension and whether a spare set of wheels and tires was included. @Mesquitej questioned the car's racing history, mentioning potential issues with usage and maintenance, such as expired harness certification, implying some buyers might be wary of these elements.
|
 |
Positive: @SAImports has conveyed that the 2015 Audi Q7 TDI Diesel is in fantastic mechanical condition with comprehensive service work just completed, ensuring it performs exceptionally well. Commenters have complimented the seller's transparency and organization, with @Uby67vw1958 expressing admiration for the auction process. The vehicle features a clean interior, no paint imperfections, and all electronics function perfectly, fostering a sense of trust in the vehicle's quality.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @GC-Sheep and @vertdaferk, raised questions regarding the vehicle's suspension and the impacts of the lift kit, which has been confirmed by @SAImports to be reversible. The seller also provided clarifications on the vehicle's cruise control features and tire clearance during turning. The discussion covered various aspects of the Audi Q7, reflecting interests in technical specifications and potential adjustments for optimal performance.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns about specific features and performance aspects. @Mr_White questioned whether adaptive cruise control is present due to the lift and tire size, while @marvinight requested additional photos of the underside, hinting at worries about rust. There were also inquiries regarding blind spot monitoring and the condition of the EGR cooler, showcasing a proactive approach to assessing the vehicle's overall condition amidst the enthusiasm for the auction.
|
 |
Positive: Comments reflect an appreciation for the Aston Martin DB11 V12, highlighting its stunning interior and luxurious features. @JuiceMan11 noted the interesting interior with carbon accents, while @MJHE30 called it the most stunning car interior they have ever seen. @Kollins shared their experience with the compliant suspension and emphasized the car's stunning seating, capturing the attention of many. The seller, @TheBaptisteCollection, described the car as an absolute blast to drive, especially praising the dynamic nature between GT and Sport+ modes. Several bidders, including @FastlaneFoto and @WesKlock, expressed admiration for the car's beauty and design. @SeanMTX offered testimonials about the car's power and unique sound, further enhancing its allure.
Neutral: Several comments included inquiries and remarks about the car's ownership and specifications. @TPraceman raised questions about the number of previous owners, while @mcs1912 asked about assurance of maintenance from previous owners given the car's seven owners. @bryanp inquired about the AMR Performance Pack and its implications for the vehicle's suspension. @Voxx82 requested more detailed videos, specifically cold start and driving footage, which the seller verified were to be posted shortly. @DB6 asked about the shipping estimator and pointed out potential issues regarding the driving video and key availability. The seller addressed these points, affirming the car's quality and features while inviting more inquiries.
Negative: Some comments presented concerns regarding the car's ownership history, with @TPraceman expressing disbelief over the car having seven owners in a short period. @mcs1912 specifically requested additional maintenance documentation to alleviate any concerns regarding previous owners' care. @EJrumble criticized the car's interior color choices, describing it as a 'confused build' and suggesting it would be better with a different exterior color. @ckwaters lamented the presence of salt on the car, worried about potential damage and upkeep. @1lotus1 also echoed the sentiment against driving in winter conditions due to road salt hazards. These negative reflections focus primarily on ownership uncertainties and aesthetic choices.
|
 |
Positive: @Deano describes the car as "Semplicemente magnifico!" showcasing his admiration. @nucleonic praises the vehicle, stating that he has a twin of this car and rates it a 10 out of 10, recommending it strongly. @benzog adds that this car is delightful to own, especially in colors other than red, commenting that its lines are overwhelming in person. @benzo mentions the easy serviceability of the car while @gdapron shares his positive experience of fitting comfortably in the GTB despite being taller at 6'2". @VintageBMWDude compliments the listing as one of the best he has seen, highlighting the stunning quality of the pictures and thoroughness of the details, contributing to an overall positive impression of the vehicle.
Neutral: @1600veloce (The Seller) provides detailed information about the selling process, service, and location of the vehicle, showcasing their professionalism as a weekly active seller with over 2,160 listings on BaT. He invites interested buyers to view the car in person by appointment due to high demand, indicating that the vehicle is in a climate-controlled facility and ready for delivery. @jpotur raises questions about headroom for taller drivers, reflecting curiosity, while @mike_747 touches on a technical aspect of the car's bumpers, indicating ongoing engagement about the vehicle's specifications and details.
Negative: On a critical note, @ChevyDave voices a preference for the GTS model over the GTB, suggesting that the latter may not deliver the same open-air driving experience, hinting at a lack of excitement associated with the GTB. Additionally, @bertrand raises concerns about functionality, wondering if any systems on the low mileage vehicle are inoperative, including the air conditioning and other features, which could detract from buyer confidence. @79Sprinter expresses skepticism regarding a perceived shadow or crack in an image, questioning the car's cosmetic integrity and painting standards, which could imply potential issues with vehicle quality.
|
 |
Positive: @gscharnagl mentions the sharp interior design of the vehicle and highlights its beauty. @GasolineAlleyGarage, the seller, emphasizes that the car, a 2012 Mercedes-Benz S550, is in exceptional condition, has been well cared for, and comes with luxurious features such as bespoke leather seats and a quality audio system. The seller also asserts that it functions perfectly, is garage-kept in Southern California, and has low mileage, indicating a level of reliability and performance that aligns with luxury vehicle standards.
Neutral: Several commenters have sought clarification on registration details and potential concerns about the vehicle, such as @rbroederer and @Sonofzohan, who ask about mechanical issues and California's sales tax policies for out-of-state buyers. @GasolineAlleyGarage addresses these inquiries, reassuring potential buyers about the registration status and the car’s comprehensive maintenance history. Other comments, like those from @LoudounPrime and @BlackBeard, focus on technical features and specifications of the car, including the absence of specific efficiency technologies but signal a general interest in the car's attributes and performance capabilities.
Negative: @M117.961 and @scottjferrarigiu express concern about mismatched tires on the vehicle, which they feel is unacceptable for a luxury car like the S-Class. @HCN questions the accuracy of the premium sound system details, indicating potential discrepancies in the car's listing. Additionally, @TonyBTony raises concerns about possible damage to the car's bumpers, reflecting skepticism about the vehicle's presentation. These negative remarks point to a need for transparency and thorough inspection to ensure the vehicle meets high standards expected by luxury car buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @RumbleAuto expresses excitement about the rarity of a sunroof-less 944 in the USA, noting its unique Euro spec origins and wishing good luck to the seller. @Jackyp describes the vehicle as a "slick top" which contributes to its appeal. @Vtec4ever states that the car is a bucket list item, emphasizing its desirability. @Spokayman praises the presence of a German 944 in the States and mentions its increased horsepower due to its European specifications.
Neutral: @Timing, the seller, provides insights into the uniqueness of the car, pointing out its slick top, Euro bumpers, and absence of a passenger side mirror. The seller acknowledges questions regarding the vehicle's mileage inconsistency due to a swap of the instrument cluster. @Spokayman and the seller discuss the car's model year based on the VIN, with the seller confirming that extensive research leads to the identification of the car as a 1984 model. @Verdigris inquires about the stone-chip covers, while @Spokayman provides a detailed response about their removal.
Negative: @Spokayman raises concern about the 1999-2008 mileage inconsistency, suggesting that the odometer might have been swapped at some point, which complicates the understanding of the vehicle's true mileage. @Spokayman also points out that the car won't meet emissions testing requirements despite its desirable specs. The seller acknowledges potential delays in obtaining further information about the vehicle's history and the condition of various components, conveying a sense of uncertainty that could impact buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors have expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance and condition. @mef0629 loves the color and wishes good luck to the seller. @goose747 describes it as a beauty, while @Duke03 remarks on the beautiful original paint and clean floors, indicating its overall appeal.
Neutral: Several commentors have requested additional information and visuals. @rolandfj40 inquires about cold start and driving videos, and @Twelvepaws asks for details about rust and the original seats. Meanwhile, @911r, the seller, has responded proactively by providing driving videos and pictures of the carburetor, which suggests a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the vehicle's integrity that have been raised. @cruisermatt points out that the rear sill appears to have been replaced incorrectly, and @snejad questions whether there is backfiring on deceleration. Additionally, @Twelvepaws questions the extent of repairs related to rust and mentions a missing belt, indicating underlying issues that could affect buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @GCEA (The Seller) describes the 1996 Chevrolet S-10 Extended Cab as a strong, great-driving truck that stands out with its hand-painted custom graphics. The excitement around the vehicle is palpable; @CobraMunk reminisces about mini-trucks and expresses enthusiasm over the sound and aesthetics of a lowered truck with a V8. Several users, including @RumbleAuto and @GCEA, highlight the truck's impressive power and performance with comments about its acceleration and driving characteristics, suggesting it's a fun vehicle to own.
Neutral: @GCEA (The Seller) has provided detailed information about the truck, including various updates and video uploads showcasing its condition, sound, and driving experience. There were inquiries from users like @Jnwells about features such as air conditioning and heating, which @GCEA confirmed it lacks. @CRE questioned the availability of build reports for S-10 trucks and @rjdayyat inquired about horsepower and the truck's past history, indicating interest in the vehicle’s background.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle, particularly @Daggwood's question regarding a whirring noise from the engine at idle, which was explained by @GCEA as a normal sound from a performance gear-drive timing set. Additionally, @rjdayyat expressed uncertainty about whether the vehicle could pass a smog test and be street-registered, which suggests potential limitations for buyers. @anthonyjp questioned whether the truck should be categorized as a mini-truck, indicating some ambiguity in classification or purpose.
|
 |
Positive: The feedback on the 1999 4Runner is overwhelmingly positive, with numerous commenters praising its condition and driveability. @Idavidsheldon described it as 'just about as perfect as it gets!' while @Archer84 expressed excitement over finally seeing this highly anticipated vehicle, noting that it does not disappoint. Multiple users, including @IMAGINETHAT and @mommyscreditcard, referred to it as 'very clean' and a 'beautiful rig,' suggesting it is a special find among 3rd generation models. @Sarki remarked on how well-loved and babied the vehicle seems, affirming its appeal to enthusiasts.
Neutral: Many comments engaged with the details surrounding the vehicle's maintenance and history, clarifying various aspects that prospective buyers might want to know. The seller, @CRUSH, was transparent about an accident that had previously occurred, which involved a minor bumper repair, and assured potential buyers that no major harm was done to the vehicle. Some users pointed out specifics, such as whether the suspension was stock or lifted, and any visible condition issues like the dash or body mounts—finding them generally acceptable given the vehicle's age. @1985pickup asked for clarification on the vehicle's color, with @CRUSH confirming it as Desert Dune Metallic.
Negative: There were a few concerns raised by commenters regarding minor details of the vehicle that may be drawbacks for some potential buyers. @cross08 posed a question about the dash potentially lifting, and @chevyman75 expressed worry over the body mounts appearing to hang, asking if they required replacement. @Idavidsheldon also noted the absence of a sunroof as a disappointment for their personal preference, despite acknowledging the vehicle's overall beauty. User @Jacarter3 mentioned the need for an automatic vehicle due to an upcoming shoulder surgery, which reflects how not all features align with every potential buyer's requirements. Overall, while these comments did not overshadow the positive remarks, they indicated that there are some factors that might turn off specific individuals.
|
 |
Positive: @Officerbob's build has garnered positive attention from fellow enthusiasts, with comments highlighting the appealing wider stance and functional modifications, particularly the fender flares. @Hockster expressed admiration for the way these enhancements contribute to the vehicle's off-road capabilities, indicating they make sense for a Bronco intended for rugged use. Similarly, users like @boaboyoz praised the overall build, calling it 'a righteous red Bronco' and wishing for a successful sale (GLWTA).
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on certain aspects of the vehicle. For instance, @KTDreemz inquired about the purpose of the second battery, speculating whether it was used for winching or other accessories. @samjaywin also asked about the inclusion of a fully covered soft top and whether it would work properly, indicating curiosity about the vehicle's modifications. These questions reflect a shared interest in understanding the practical implications of the vehicle's features and how they affect performance.
Negative: There was a noticeable lack of engagement from the seller, with @samjaywin expressing frustration about the quiet response to their inquiries. This concern was echoed by others, who noted the seller had not yet addressed several important questions, including potential video content showcasing the vehicle's start-up and driving capabilities. The comments from @samjaywin about contacting the seller privately highlight a degree of disappointment in the communication, suggesting that potential buyers might be feeling neglected.
|
 |
Positive: @Josefitz highlights that the E39 540i automatic is often overlooked but represents excellent value, likely having been better maintained than others. @Kouks mentions owning two black E39 540i Sport models and appreciates the ride quality, hinting that he might consider adding another to his collection. @cj11 agrees with @etip on the beauty of Style 32s on the vehicle and notes that the combination of black paint and these wheels is particularly appealing.
Neutral: Multiple commenters discuss the importance of vehicle history and maintenance records, especially regarding potential repairs like timing chain and guide replacements. @etip questions the seller about records related to these repairs, and @gwarcuri suggests leveraging a good service advisor at a BMW dealer to verify the vehicle's maintenance history. @4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) indicates that no documentation has been obtained but speculates on the condition of repairs based on recent service.
Negative: Concerns about the lack of maintenance records loom large, with @adventuress365247 questioning if any repairs on the timing chain and guides have been made. @etip expresses skepticism regarding how the seller can confirm certain repairs without documentation, while @4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) struggles to clarify the situation without compromising privacy or transparency regarding past maintenance. Overall, there is a general unease among commenters regarding the car's service history.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express excitement and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its fun factor and performance. @RumbleAuto reminisces about a similar car being extremely enjoyable, while @Base2476 (The Seller) shares personal experiences of driving the car on the street and its impressive attention compared to high-end brands like McLaren and Ferrari. Additionally, @Base2476 mentions the vehicle's fun driving experience with a turbo setup, highlighting how the car, despite being track-oriented, behaves surprisingly well on the road.
Neutral: Several inquiries focus on specific details about the vehicle's modifications and status. Questions from various users like @mkiv808, @gcxnirvana, and @Pjku79 revolve around fuel starvation solutions, pictures of the underside, and the car's power output. @Base2476 provides detailed responses, confirming upgrades to the fuel system and the impressive power output from the twin-charged engine, as well as clarifying aspects like the car's street legality and the status of the roll cage.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's modifications and potential issues are also noted among the comments. Some users, including @Kramj and @ErikLS2, question its admissibility in states with emissions inspections, stating that the lack of catalytic converters could pose problems. Additionally, there are comments expressing skepticism about the $900 documentation fee as excessive, indicated by users like @LLHVAC. @tpackard raises a query about the vehicle’s braking system and modifications related to fuel starvation which were not clear, revealing some uncertainty about the car's overall reliability.
|
|
|