Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the 1967 Ferrari 330 GTC, calling it a "work of art" and a "beauty" with timeless elegance. @sicklesteel praises its aesthetics, while @ivansky70 highlights its stunning lines and excellent color. The discussions emphasize the vehicle's status as one of the best driving Ferraris from this era, with several users, including @ForzaV12 and @Beagle, noting how it excels in both performance and driving enjoyment. @Idriveprosche recounts seeing the car at prestigious events, affirming its quality and detailing, and noting it consistently wins awards. The car also has a storied history, having received numerous concours awards, indicating it has been well-cared for and cherished in the Ferrari community.
Neutral: Several commenters share their knowledge about the Ferrari's production details and its model history, reflecting on the debates around the 330 GTC designation and production years, notably with @Busterdog60 clarifying Ferrari's lack of formal model years during the 1966-1968 production. @Hoppy18 humorously connects personal aspirations with car ownership while others discuss the practicality of these vintage models, including their usability today. Some comments also dive into technical discussions about the vehicle's maintenance and mechanical enhancements, suggesting that many enthusiasts appreciate engaging in these automotive conversations.
Negative: A few comments bring up concerns regarding the car, particularly regarding its features like the inoperative air conditioning system. @eltee and @MaranelloBoy criticize the lack of functional A/C, indicating that this could affect buyer interest and value. Others, like @mike_747, question the car's leaked fluid, hinting at potential maintenance issues. Additionally, there are discussions about the color choices, with @mike_747 stating the car's color might be seen as atypical for its era. Overall, while the car garners significant praise, these comments highlight the scrutiny and expectations that come with classic car ownership.
 |
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the Volvo 240, highlighting its reliability and functionality. @96Cruiser called it one of the best cars ever built, while @Mordizzle referred to it as the last of the long roof "bricks." The sentiment was that these vehicles, especially with a bit of care, can provide joy and unforgettable experiences, particularly for younger drivers or families. @DrJacquesStrappe described it as perfect for a high school senior or college student, emphasizing its safety and usability. @Lucky7 reminisced fondly about their own similar car, affirming its cool factor and practicality.
Neutral: Several commentators seemed more focused on clarifying details about the car's specifications and condition rather than expressing strong opinions. For instance, @Ycbmsma pointed out the model name confusion regarding the 240 and 245 nomenclature. @Jokull-mtl asked specifics about the door hinge repairs, while @YV1LW had questions about the service records, pointing to multiple maintenance issues that required clarification from the seller. The discussion reflected a genuine interest in understanding the vehicle's history and current state, balancing positivity with practical inquiries.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the car's condition and the seller's responsiveness about recent damages, particularly the crumple on the rear quarter panels. @XraySpecs and @masterqi noted potential rust and collision damage, questioning the completeness of disclosed repairs and the implications of the visible wear. @chandlerlewis expressed anxiety over the lack of response from the seller about the accident damage and rust issues, suggesting a lack of transparency. Overall, while the car drew nostalgia and affection from many, there were evident apprehensions about its maintenance history and current condition, causing some negativity in the discourse.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the Lada Niva's unique appeal and off-road capabilities, with @justpaul noting its cool appearance and resemblance to vintage vehicles like the late 70s Honda Civic. @SteveinVT shared positive experiences from owning a Niva in Kazakhstan, praising its reliability and off-road performance, emphasizing its mechanical simplicity and ease of maintenance. Others, including @SRatzer (The Seller), mentioned the strong supply of parts and stated the vehicle is a fun, unique collectors' item that draws attention. Overall, there is admiration for the Niva's enduring design and functionality, particularly for rural or off-road use.
Neutral: Several individuals noted their familiarity with the Lada Niva from past experiences, with @JagBee reminiscing about its use in Brazil as a benchmark for off-road ability. Commenters are seeking specific details, such as driving videos and maintenance requirements, indicating an interest in understanding how well the vehicle performs day-to-day. @SRatzer (The Seller) provided insights into the Niva's driving characteristics, noting that it's best suited for country roads and that it has some quirks, such as a slightly erratic fuel gauge, making it a vehicle to monitor closely during use.
Negative: Some comments express concern about the Lada Niva's practicality for modern driving conditions. @Candyhenderson and @cmcfadden questioned whether it would handle highway driving well and discussed the potential risks of road-tripping a 40-year-old vehicle. @xor provided a cautionary note about the vehicle's unsafe performance at higher speeds, highlighting its limitations. Additionally, @bewildered shared a negative anecdote about Nivas being left to rust at dealerships, further emphasizing concerns about maintaining the car in good condition.
|
 |
Positive: @NJFoltz2025 (The Seller) described the vehicle as an 'excellent build' with a big block and 6-speed transmission, while other commenters like @Siowner praised it for its top quality, awards won, and over 700 horsepower. @Trust-in-the-Machine noted the interior's high-end material choices, comparing the leather smell to that of a new Rolls, and highlighted the stunning visuals of the car's construction. Comments from @BubbaGPZ1100 and @CreativeClassics emphasized the car's impressive paint work and the effort that went into ensuring color continuity despite lighting effects, suggesting that it's a standout build worthy of admiration.
Neutral: Multiple commenters sought clarification on potential inconsistencies in the paint, particularly on the passenger door, with several attributing the perceived mismatch to lighting effects rather than actual discrepancies. @NJFoltz2025 and @CreativeClassics both explained that the paint used enhances visual depth through varying pearls and transparencies, creating different appearances depending on the angle and light. Others, including @HemiSam and @jesus_christ, posed technical questions regarding the car's performance and specifications, showcasing interest without negative implications.
Negative: Some commenters critiqued the necessity for explanations regarding the paintwork, expressing frustration over repeated inquiries that they felt had already been addressed, as noted by @RevSome. Questions about the car's racing capabilities raised eyebrows, particularly from @ronsant, who questioned how the seller could list the car without having pushed it to its limits on a track. Others pointed to lighting inconsistencies and speculated about potential issues, such as @KarmannG2109's mention of a steep reserve price due to the high investment, alluding to market challenges for such a specialized build.
|
 |
Positive: The overall reception of the 2014 Jaguar F-Type Convertible has been quite welcoming and enthusiastic. @Collectibleclassics, the seller, highlights the vehicle's 43,000 miles and emphasizes their commitment to providing valuable information and transparency to potential buyers. Additionally, the car's stunning photography has been praised, and comments reflect the belief that it drives nicely, further augmenting its appeal. Several users have shared effective techniques for addressing the common issue of 'sticky' interior components, finding creative ways to maintain the car's aesthetic and functionality.
Neutral: Questions have been raised about the interior condition of the vehicle, particularly regarding the 'sticky stuff' mentioned in the comments. @afterthedecline expressed curiosity about the extent of the issue, and @Jaguarmaven inquired about specific features such as the functionality of the center stack air vent and rear spoiler, which have all been confirmed. The seller has been responsive to these inquiries, highlighting both the vehicle's merits and openly addressing its shortcomings without shying away from the issues presented by users.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects, some concerns about the vehicle's interior condition remain prevalent. @66GTconvorigownr mentioned personal experiences with sticky components, indicating a history of similar issues in luxury vehicles, while @CraigInPA humorously noted that the timing of the sale could be less than ideal due to seasonal factors. Moreover, the seller acknowledged that while efforts have been made to clean the sticky components, they have not achieved perfection, which may deter some potential buyers who seek a meticulously maintained vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @carsfromafar (The Seller) highlights the uniqueness of the vehicle, stating that this color and specification is extremely rare and that everything about the car is in excellent condition, both inside and outside. Furthermore, @DurranJapan notes the difficulty of finding such a vehicle in good condition and wishes the seller luck, which reinforces the car's desirable qualities. The seller also assures potential buyers about the car's verified mileage and zero accident history from the Japanese CarVX report, showcasing the vehicle's reliability and authenticity.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about features and specifics regarding the Pajero Mini. @Lyonsvee asks about the air conditioning and tire condition, receiving confirmation from @carsfromafar (The Seller) that both the AC and heating systems function properly, and the tires show no signs of age-related damage. @Kutya inquires about the vehicle's four-wheel-drive capabilities, which the seller confirms, stating it comes with a true high-low transfer case, affirming its 4WD functionality. Additionally, @mbz300sdl questions the possibility of a temporary tag, leading to a clarification on the seller's limitations in providing one.
Negative: @lilcarlover raises a concern about the quick sale of the vehicle by a private party, questioning the seller's motives for parting with the car shortly after purchasing it. It's indicative of potential skepticism from buyers regarding the seller's intentions. However, this comment is balanced by positive remarks from other users, such as @Hatchtopia, who notes the exceptional condition of the vehicle's undercarriage, emphasizing the car's high maintenance and overall quality regardless of its recent sale.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as "absolutely superb," indicating high satisfaction. @Submoose praises it as the "Peak touring car Porsche" with its 6-speed manual and convertible features. @944orNothing calls it a "wonderful vehicle" wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @Hoppy18 highlights the car as a gem, and @boaboyoz appreciates the stylish aesthetic with the red accents, referring to it as a "sexy beast". @FremontPorsche, the seller, reassures customers about the car's condition, mentioning a recent major service and warranty, while @BLKLZD commends the car's comfort during mountain drives, emphasizing its drivability.
Neutral: @Iamjames notes that while the seats may not be the most racetrack-oriented, they could be more comfortable and suitable for daily driving. @pjelmoni shares insights from owning a GT3T, agreeing on the comfort level of the seats for regular use over racing. @FremontPorsche further explains that the car will come with a Porsche CPO warranty if sold to individuals, providing added security for a potential buyer. Discussions around aftermarket options and modifications lead to a consensus about the vehicle's design, mentioning both the aesthetic choices and practical features, with several commentors discussing their experiences with seat comfort.
Negative: @mynameistimo expresses a personal disinterest in the vehicle, suggesting that the color scheme does not appeal to them. @s28hero voices disappointment with the OEM exhaust, indicating that it may not meet expectations for some buyers. Additionally, @Jimbo912 inquires about the Porsche certification, suggesting a concern for authenticity and potential resale value. @Pinkbunny mentions a lack of ventilated seats as a notable drawback for a convertible, hinting at room for improvement despite the car's generally positive reception.
|
 |
Positive: @musketeer31 expressed interest in whether the vehicle has been smoked in and if the original wheels are included. @xpozerlock praised the vehicle's appearance, referring to it as a "beautiful clean looking Rapide" and complimented the wheels for adding an edge to its elegance. Similarly, @DB11 agrees that the front wheels are wider compared to the Rapide, indicating an understanding of the car's design aspects.
Neutral: Some comments addressed inquiries regarding the car's condition and history. @Trailrunner601 confirmed the front wheel's size difference while mentioning owning both models, implying a familiarity with their characteristics. @troydnixon raised concerns about discrepancies in mileage and asked the seller for clarification, noting potential DMV issues. Several users, such as @ycbmsma and @Mica44, inquired about the mileage discrepancies and past accidents, suggesting a cautious approach to the bidding process.
Negative: The seller, @JoeJoe408, faced multiple questions without clear responses, leading @Jeffglen to express concern about the low price and lack of engagement. @Mica44 pointed out potentially significant issues, including accident history and mileage discrepancies that weren't addressed adequately. @CSGC noted evidence of possible paint damage, with others like @troydnixon emphasizing their hesitation to bid due to unanswered inquiries, reflecting a general apprehension about the vehicle's transparency and current condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's color combination, particularly highlighting the appeal of the Marine Blue paired with Grand Prix White. @GDogg noted that the color looks fantastic, while @Caymanorcarrera mentioned that the navy leather interior complements it nicely, indicating that it is a desirable setup. Additionally, @AML1 commented on the appreciation for the rear wiper deletion, reinforcing the positive sentiment toward the vehicle's aesthetics and features. @70SATMan also praised the well-kept originality of the vehicle, suggesting it is a strong candidate for those looking to purchase a G50.
Neutral: There were discussions about the model year of the vehicle, with several commenters providing insights based on VIN analysis. @Topaz_Drive initiated the conversation by questioning if it was a 1987 or 1988 model, which @GJSPIN and @b_trenkamp clarified by detailing indicators supporting the 1988 classification. @eddieames brought attention to the updates that Porsche made throughout the model years, indicating that certain features might appear variably across different years. @Rushkar (The Seller) provided further confirmation by adjusting the model year listing based on the feedback, demonstrating responsiveness to the community's inquiries.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the condition and functionality of the vehicle. @Lvtodrive911 and others probed about the maintenance records, any known issues like potential oil leaks, and specific details about the integrity of paintwork, with @Rocksterdibs requesting clarification on any repainting. The seller acknowledged some flaws, mentioning that the hood and lid struts need replacement, a common issue, and noted that the cruise control initially didn't work but has since been repaired. Such discussions indicated some apprehension about the vehicle's upkeep and condition, despite overall appreciation for its design.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the black Thunderbird as a 'tasty burger' and expressed good wishes for the sale. @kmaraschino noted it as a nice-looking car, preferring the smooth chrome hubcaps over wire wheels, indicating a strong preference for its aesthetic appeal. @philrya1 (The Seller) confirmed that the car 'drives well and starts great,' which adds to the positive impressions of its mechanical reliability. Additionally, @grjoe1 appreciated the unique historical aspects of the early Bird model, suggesting that it could bring 'smiles of fun' if properly restored.
Neutral: Many comments provided a balanced view of the car's condition. @philrya1 (The Seller) acknowledged that the paint was not perfect but wanted to fairly represent the car in the listing, emphasizing that the imperfections were due to age rather than severe damage. @swimbikerunut complimented the car after seeing its indoor photos, suggesting that its presentation could be improved by showcasing the shiny images first. @FernandinaBill asked various questions regarding the car's performance, indicating a neutral inquiry about its condition and necessary future investment.
Negative: Some commentators expressed concerns about the car's condition and required maintenance. @birddoc pointed out that while the car looks decent, it 'needs a lot of work,' which might deter potential buyers. @swimbikerunut also criticized the initial photos, suggesting that the outdoor images made the paint look scuffed, raising doubts about its condition. Additionally, @Mordizzle inquired about the specifics of the electrical system, hinting at possible underlying concerns about upgrades and maintenance of older vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @zdoctor highlights the appeal of the car, particularly praising the chrome wheels and expressing excitement about it. @LongDucDong appreciates the sound produced by the Magnaflow exhaust system, deeming it a pleasant combination of subdued yet aggressive. There is also an appreciation for the car's selling price trends, with @Trublmakkr noting that these cars are increasing in value over time, suggesting that future owners should perform necessary service updates to maintain its beauty and reliability.
Neutral: @madmatt007 raises a thoughtful concern about the aftermarket stereo components potentially conflicting with the original Bose system, showing caution based on their previous experience. @Jzack contributes to this discussion by mentioning that Crutchfield offered an adapter for better integration of non-OEM stereo units with the stock Bose speakers, thereby presenting an option for potential buyers. Further, @quirk2, the seller, confirms that major services like the timing belt and water pump replacements were done with OEM parts, indicating some level of maintenance history that could be beneficial to a buyer.
Negative: Comments regarding potential issues with the vehicle raise some concern. @Kbaran expresses skepticism regarding the car’s auction price given its high mileage, suggesting that the bidding may not reflect its true value. Additionally, @problematics324 questions the timing service history, implying that the 2004 service mentioned may need to be revisited before the auction. @mmogab expands on this concern by stressing the importance of timely maintenance on such cars, adding a layer of urgency to the decision of prospective bidders.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the TDI Beetle Convertible, with @leusgs noting its rarity and @snafuracer calling it the ultimate TDI. @Chromantix fondly reminisced about their own TDI Beetle and expressed that the new owner will be very happy with this special vehicle. @djt2 (The Seller) also highlighted how precious this model is, encouraging people not to miss their chance to own it.
Neutral: Several commenters sought additional information regarding the vehicle's history and features. For instance, @mk7Pilot asked about the TDI recall status and noted discrepancies in the vehicle literature while @abscars expressed curiosity about its fuel efficiency and compared it to their own gas-powered car. There were also technical inquiries, such as @Knutspeed2024's questions about potential DPF issues, indicating an interest in vehicle reliability and service history.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition and history, with @Vertiblin inquiring about paint meter readings and @EnduroKarter asking for a video of the engine start and running condition. @masterofnon mentioned potential hidden costs related to emissions, while others like @uby67vw1967 questioned the timing belt and cooling system's maintenance. @el_guappo shared a mixed review about an aftermarket CarPlay unit they installed, suggesting that while installation was easy, long-term reliability was uncertain.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its stunning color combination, likening it to the original concept Boxster. @Todd_F remarked that it is the best color combo while @scbarr echoed his sentiment, expressing nostalgia. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, presented the car with transparency and confidence, showcasing recent service records that highlighted extensive maintenance, which many participants viewed positively. @oldgtracer appreciated the honest presentation of the car with ample photographs and videos, noting it was a 'beautiful car'. @Shawh expressed enthusiasm for the car, wishing the best for the future owner, and @Lilptr called it an honest vehicle with a good build and colors.
Neutral: Several comments were focused on addressing questions about the vehicle's history and condition. @NewUpper inquired if the car had been listed on another auction site, and @ACRX7 requested details regarding a reported accident. The seller responded with clarifications, reassuring potential bidders about the cosmetic nature of previous damages. @Magnumsilva sought confirmation about the presence of oil leaks and the original manual holder. These questions indicate a cautious approach from potential buyers who were looking for more information before deciding to bid.
Negative: Some commenters pointed out discrepancies or concerns related to the vehicle's details. @Elitephysiques mentioned the absence of factory decals on the hood, which raised doubts regarding potential repainting issues, though @Collectibleclassics defended its condition. @Spokayman questioned the legality of red front-facing turn signals and speculated on their origin, suggesting it could be a cause for concern. @luluchiboy expressed dissatisfaction with the bumper color match, implying a need for aesthetic improvement. Lastly, @dudethatsmycar and @Spokayman commented on legal implications of the red lenses, reflecting a lesser degree of confidence in the vehicle's compliance with regulations.
|
 |
Positive: @CChiusolo describes the vehicle as a stunner, and @PraguePrado simply uses the word 'Yummy' to express their approval. @Jperell shares personal experience with a similar model, praising its driving experience and expressing interest in this low mileage XF. The Seller (@michaelmotorcar) emphasizes the rarity and incredible condition of the 2012 Jaguar XF Portfolio Edition, promoting it as a well-maintained vehicle with only 6000 miles. He welcomes inquiries for pre-bidding inspections, encouraging potential buyers to appreciate its features. Commenters like @lhaag and @socalvol also express admiration for the car, with the latter asking about Apple Car Play features.
Neutral: Several users, including @PraguePrado and @Skullman101, show interest in learning more about the vehicle's service history and features, such as oil changes and the functionality of the air vents. @michaelmotorcar replies to these inquiries, confirming that the car has undergone inspections and is in mechanically perfect condition. There are additional inquiries regarding the vehicle's features, including key fobs, a multi-CD player, and whether the door sills indicate the 'Portfolio' model, reflecting a balanced focus on both admiration and practical concerns.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by commenters, notably @car4mywants who highlights potential issues with the headliner and asks for more photos to clarify. There is also a request for information regarding odors and evidence of smoke or mold which the Seller addresses by assuring the interior is clean and odor-free. Additionally, @meb7591 expresses frustration about not receiving timely answers concerning the tire date codes, showcasing that potential buyers are keen on thorough details before bidding.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have shown great enthusiasm for the Mercedes Benz S55 AMG, particularly due to its remarkable history connected to Ed Bolian and the infamous 2904 race. @BidNerds (The Seller) highlighted the car's significance, emphasizing its legendary status in automotive circles. Many believe it offers a unique opportunity to own a piece of history, with @sord even suggesting it deserves a spot in an automotive museum. The car's performance, with claims of being a thrilling driver and having an impressive story, resonates well with the audience, and several commenters expressed excitement about participating in the auction.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a neutral stance on the S55 AMG, acknowledging its mixed condition. @UncleFred1 remarked on the mechanical state of the vehicle, suggesting the parts could be more valuable than the entire car, while @AndyF007 emphasized the importance of recognizing its history before making any decisions about parting it out. Comments such as @rubberduckie39's about the car's seating conditions and @mbz2000's observation regarding its wear point to a complicated perspective that balances appreciation for its story with awareness of its shortcomings.
Negative: There were critical comments regarding the condition of the S55 AMG, with several commenters expressing skepticism about its usability. @PilotJGS humorously referred to it as a "ragged out sled," indicating a belief that its physical state is less than ideal. @cj11 echoed similar sentiments, describing these older models as troublesome and often in need of extensive repairs. Concerns about the ABC suspension and other mechanical issues were raised by @The_Underhill_Account, underscoring worries about potential repair costs that could keep bidders cautious about their offers.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors expressed admiration for the vehicle's overall aesthetic and features. @bigboywill noted the competition for the car, while @ImJustSayin praised the Corvette's color, finding it richer than others. @FlatSixShooter appreciated the spec and the paint trim, sharing a personal experience with a similar option on their vehicle. @AlJr1963 and @badcad also highlighted the pleasing color combination and build, with @rickaz noting the impressive specifications. @Toptime79 described the car as 'an elegant brute,' and @Boostwagon called it one of their favorite C8 colors, emphasizing its ability to balance design elements.
Neutral: The conversation touched on some practical aspects of the car. @Maine2019 (The Seller) clarified the vehicle's location in South Carolina and answered questions about potential cosmetic issues and features such as the presence of paint protection film. Various users inquired about the absence of a front lift, which several commenters acknowledged as a contentious point. @scarydiy, @robertwichert, @badcad, and @Shelby6668 all shared their thoughts on the necessity of a front lift, with differing opinions but a consensus that they can be beneficial.
Negative: Some comments centered around concerns regarding the vehicle's options and its impact on practicality. @markwho08 and @Phlabrasca expressed disappointment about the lack of a front lift, while @weakness noted that it was a point of contention, with some voices suggesting that it could hinder usability. @TJP lamented the oversaturation of the market, suggesting that Chevrolet's strategy has diminished the vehicle's exclusivity and value. Overall, there was a mix of appreciation for the car's looks and performance, countered by critique regarding its specifications.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the Mustang II for its nostalgic qualities and unique design. @compras noted that despite being an American car and not typically their preference, the vehicle is beautifully presented and tempting to consider for someone looking to diversify their car interests. @Oldarmyguy shared fond memories of their experiences with a Mustang II, highlighting its options and performance after modifications. @Breezejammer expressed excitement about the Mustang II finally receiving attention and value in the current market. Commenters like @IMissMySaab and @Fordfirst reminisced about their own Mustang II stories, with the latter mentioning how it was a great example of a model that kept the Mustang alive during a challenging time for the brand.
Neutral: Several comments included historical context about the Mustang II model, reflecting on its place in automotive history. @Z282SLO provided sales statistics, pointing out that despite criticism, the Mustang II saw impressive sales during its production years. @sliproc acknowledged that while the car faced challenges due to regulations and changing consumer preferences, it was still a decent option for many buyers. Commenters like @DKeng commented on their personal experiences with Mustang IIs, noting their contribution to the Mustang legacy while recognizing the model's overall mixed reputation. Many expressed a sense of nostalgia tied to their memories of the car during its heyday.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, some comments indicated skepticism regarding the car's quality and performance. @daddsun shared a story of quality control issues with a previous Mustang II, suggesting the model had its flaws. @stevedutt0n referenced a critical view of the car from a past magazine article, highlighting the divide in opinions about its appeal. Concerns were raised about the car's imperfections, with the seller transparently noting issues such as an exhaust leak and a bouncy speedometer. This mixture of nostalgia and criticism reveals a nuanced perspective on the Mustang II, appealing to a specific audience while also acknowledging its limitations.
|
1963 International Harvester Travelette–Bodied 2001 Ford F-250 Super Duty Power Stroke 4×4
SB291252B3
Lot 226247
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters praise the vehicle's overall build quality and aesthetic appeal. @fringecarcollector describes it as a "fantastic build" and notes attention to detail with interior choices and paint, while @Middler89 appreciates the aesthetic but suggests minor adjustments to lift and tire size. @Bdogz69 expresses enthusiasm for the powertrain, deeming it an 'awesome build,' and @Big_DaddyRL commends the craftsmanship, appreciating the homage to International Harvester trucks. Others, such as @Trust-in-the-Machine, regard it as a unique and tastefully completed restomod that performs exceptionally well, noting its head-turning presence on the road.
Neutral: Some comments express curiosity about technical aspects without a clear positive or negative bias. @ryansrigs inquires about modifications to the frame and the origin of the AC system, while @MeirK and @plsjr5 ask for details on the donor vehicle's mileage and the aspects of the interior work respectively. @DChrist and @FJFan (The Seller) engage in a discussion about the truck's specifics, including its wheelbase, which reveals their interest in deeper vehicle mechanics rather than outright endorsement or criticism. Suggestions for potential improvements and requests for clarification on the build's parts emerge, reflecting a neutral stance on the truck's overall quality.
Negative: While predominantly positive feedback is apparent, there are a few mentions of doubt regarding certain features. @Emmettbuilt questions the ride quality and handling with the modifications made for highway use, implying skepticism about the truck's overall driving comfort. @CorsaSpeciale shares concerns about safety features in modern driving conditions, contemplating the balance between vintage aesthetics and contemporary safety needs. Additionally, a lighthearted comment from @snafuracer humorously suggests an overwhelmingly positive reaction to the truck might be akin to an obsession, hinting that such an attraction could lead to unhealthy consequences. Overall, these comments reflect minor criticisms focused on performance and practicality rather than the build itself.
|
 |
Positive: @mafundsalow noted the comfort seats (option 456) as exceptional for long drives, highlighting their quality. @motomarc (The Seller) expressed a deep affection for the vehicle's history, mentioning his experiences and upgrades, including the manual transmission swap which was carefully sourced from his previous car. Overall, the car is described as cleaner than photos depict, with the seller encouraging potential buyers that they will be pleased with their purchase.
Neutral: There are discussions about the manual transmission swap, with @RMcarperson questioning if a swapped transmission is as good as factory original. @mynameistimo offered insights into how quality of installation matters more than the parts used, while @gweaver inquired about the miles on the transmission and whether the original automatic was available. @Jim_rosenthal brought up concerns about the OBD system post-swap, to which motomarc (The Seller) confirmed there are no issues, providing further clarity on the vehicle's modifications and maintenance.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the condition of the car's interior, particularly by @mscottc1, who pointed out potential issues with the rear seat pockets and the center armrest, expressing skepticism about the repairability. Additionally, @gweaver mentioned the fragility of the comfort seat hinges, noting they often break with use and require repairs. Furthermore, @Adventuress365247 asked about any necessary repairs on timing components, to which motomarc (The Seller) stated that no repairs were required during his ownership, indicating possible uncertainties for buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @VantageAuto highlighted that the vehicle is a fantastic looking and driving example with incredibly low mileage, powered by a reliable and powerful naturally aspirated 3.0 liter inline 6 engine. This engine is noted for its superior sound quality compared to the smaller boosted 4-cylinder motors currently available in BMWs, which enhances the driving experience. Additionally, both the body and interior are reported to be in well above average condition with no smoke or odors present, suggesting careful ownership and maintenance.
Neutral: @SoGi inquired about the presence of a heated steering wheel, to which @VantageAuto responded that it was not offered on the 1 series. This implies that while the vehicle has many positive attributes, it may lack certain modern features that some buyers might expect. The conversation indicates a willingness to engage with potential buyers, addressing their questions directly, which could reflect positively on the selling experience.
Negative: There are no significant negative comments regarding the vehicle. @VantageAuto maintains a positive outlook and expresses confidence in the quality of the car, asserting it is one of the best examples available. However, the absence of a heated steering wheel might be considered a downside for buyers who prioritize that feature.
|
 |
Positive: Multiple users expressed admiration for the Mazda 6 wagon, describing it as a fantastic vehicle with great handling, comfort, and practical features. @That3000gtguy highlighted the lack of road noise and overall driving experience that exceeded expectations for its era. @timandsons reminisced about their positive experiences with the car, labeling it as possibly the best all-around vehicle they have ever owned, capable of high mileage without frequent stops. @mistah_nahamsha echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing that potential buyers won't be disappointed, especially with the V6 engine and wagon body option.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in technical discussions about the vehicle's features and potential modifications. @mlowengrub inquired about retrofitting front seat heaters, indicating an interest in customizing the car's comfort features. @RWD-FTW suggested an aftermarket solution for seat heaters, while @PiRround raised questions about the exhaust system configuration. The seller, @Fredsfleet, provided clarifications on these inquiries, reinforcing the car's well-maintained condition and usability, including a past towing experience.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, some users pointed out concerns about the vehicle's susceptibility to rust, particularly in areas with harsh winters. @Ycbmsma shared their past experiences with multiple Mazda vehicles deteriorating quickly due to road salt exposure, underscoring the rarity of finding a rust-free specimen. @mr_smee lamented the scarcity of Mazda 6 wagons in their area, noting that the ones they saw were in poor condition. Additionally, @inabadway raised questions about the vehicle's history and potential issues, reflecting some uncertainty about its overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: @jpr highlights the unique aspect of a lowered W123 in the auction, making it a captivating watch. @JAY-Z appreciates the sand beige color and notes the rarity of the model, commending its simplicity and the allure of owning a 240D with a manual transmission. @ttv566 expresses excitement over the vehicle's aesthetic, finding the lowered look appealing and ideal for casual car gatherings, while @GretaBenz90 acknowledges its good condition compared to others on the market, deeming it an honest potential purchase.
Neutral: @aegmotorsports (The Seller) provides details about the vehicle's modifications, including the K&N air filter which they claim improves performance, and its maintenance history, indicating ownership by a master technician. @gusbaganz and @CNalbone7 both request videos for a cold start and driving test to gauge performance better. @MJKB suggests the car could serve well as a daily driver for a teenager or as a restoration project, indicating mixed levels of interest in its future use.
Negative: @jabbejokker questions the vehicle's acceptance in the auction, while @wdbcoupe's comment was flagged for being non-constructive, sparking a rebuttal from @aegmotorsports, who emphasizes civility. @simp205 raises concerns about the inoperative glow plug warning light affecting the starting procedure, and @912Pcar inquires about the necessary repairs to make the A/C operational, suggesting potential issues that might deter buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express appreciation for the 1967 Chevy El Camino, highlighting its aesthetics and overall quality. @RMQ333 notes that it looks like a great driver and indicates it appears to be an honest car. @ckwaveski and @Hrdude both show enthusiasm for the vehicle, with @ckwaveski commending its appearance in black and @Hrdude expressing love for the model. Furthermore, @boaboyoz calls it a bad a$ black El Camino, while @sliproc, who owns one, affirms that the '67 is the nicest model of the '60s El Caminos. Multiple users also compliment the vehicle's rugged and handsome look, especially regarding its wheels, according to @BMcD.
Neutral: Several comments focus on clarifying details about the vehicle's VIN and restoration history. @Elsbernd29 (The Seller) provides background, explaining the vehicle's restoration and mentioning the lack of documentation, while also confirming that the VIN matches the clean Iowa title and vehicle registration. @ssterry and @jeffschevelle engage in discussions regarding the VIN discrepancies and hidden VIN stamps, with observations about the state requirements for inspections. @Elsbernd29 further elaborates on the need for transparency concerning the title situation and the potential issuance of a replacement VIN, which could impact prospective buyers.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the vehicle's VIN and potential discrepancies. @Socks997S doubts the engine's horsepower claim, suggesting inconsistencies with the motor's specifications. @carnutvic and @ssterry highlight that the reproduction VIN tag appears to differ from the frame number, prompting worries about the title and registration processes. @Woodland66 emphasizes the need for the State of Iowa DMV to resolve issues before bidding, indicating a level of uncertainty surrounding the vehicle's legal standing. @Elsbernd29 (The Seller) acknowledges this issue and discusses the necessary steps to ensure accuracy before formalizing the sale.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed genuine interest in the vehicle, particularly noting its appealing light blue metallic color. @juju396 mentioned that the color garners compliments and offers frequently, indicating its aesthetic appeal. Additionally, the vehicle has been well-maintained with only 500 miles driven in the past three years, which suggests it could be a desirable option for buyers looking for a low-mileage vehicle. Moreover, @djmain45 confirmed that the AC blows cold air, which is considered a positive feature for comfort during warmer weather.
Neutral: There have been several inquiries about the vehicle's condition and service history, including questions about the timing belt and clutch service, as posed by @Ceewdee. @JWDynamics specifically asked for details regarding cracks in the dashboard and the functionality of the AC. The seller, @djmain45, responded that there are two cracks in the dash but assured that the AC is functional. Another neutral aspect discussed was the condition of the tires, where @djmain45 provided the date code and tread depth upon request. It is worth noting that the vehicle has not been used as a primary form of transportation, which is just information rather than a strong positive or negative.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding mechanical issues. The EGR valve is stated to be stuck closed, as mentioned by @juju396, though @djmain45 noted that it should not cause any drivability issues. However, the fact that the vehicle has only been driven for 500 miles in three years may suggest a lack of regular use, which could lead to questions about its overall reliability. Additionally, potential buyers might be wary of the age of the tires, which @juju396 pointed out need to be replaced. The presence of cracks on the dashboard is another negative aspect that could deter some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has been positively reviewed in several comments regarding its overall appearance and service history. @DiamondHunter complimented the Range Rover's great look and @A_MOTORS (The Seller) assured potential buyers that the vehicle comes with a clear Oklahoma title, Carfax report detailing 18 service records through 62K miles, and the option for shipping across the US. @A_MOTORS also addressed tire concerns and confirmed that a missing lug nut would be replaced before delivery, ensuring attention to detail in preparation for sale.
Neutral: There are neutral comments surrounding the vehicle's details and specifications. @JChrisImpla pointed out inconsistencies in the listing regarding past accidents and paint color, while @DiamondHunter questioned the accuracy of the Monroney label related to options such as the heads-up display. Additionally, potential buyers were curious about the tire conditions and paintwork in repaired areas, leading to further discussions with the seller about providing additional information and photos.
Negative: Some negative concerns were raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding the clarity of its features and condition. @JChrisImpla highlighted conflicting statements about the vehicle's accident history, which could confuse buyers. @DiamondHunter expressed frustration about unanswered questions regarding the heads-up display and noted that the Monroney labels may not reflect all of the vehicle's options. @Therealrordog requested specifics regarding the paintwork quality in repaired areas, indicating skepticism about the vehicle's condition despite the seller's claims.
|
 |
Positive: @buellwinkle described the vehicle as a 'Gorgeous Car', indicating its visual appeal. @David_P echoed this sentiment by referring to it as a 'beautiful, beautiful car'. Additionally, @neilpierson25 acknowledged @Warjon for his expertise, calling the car a 'great looking example', which reflects positively on its condition and presentation.
In a neutral context, @griz99005 inquired about the rebuild of the distributor, demonstrating a practical interest in the vehicle's maintenance history. @bobdog asked for clarification about the '16H' cast iron cylinder heads, indicating curiosity about the technical specifications. @Warjon (The Seller) provided detailed information regarding the advantages of the cast iron heads over the original aluminum ones, which may contribute to potential buyers' understanding of the vehicle's attributes.
On the other hand, comments with a negative slant included @OutOfMyElement questioning @mustang1965’s assertion about no reserve in the auction, highlighting some confusion around the auction terms. Also, @petershobbyshop raised a concern about the engine's performance in hot weather. These remarks show that while there is admiration for the car, questions about its operational reliability remain among prospective buyers.
Neutral: In a neutral context, @griz99005 inquired about the rebuild of the distributor, demonstrating a practical interest in the vehicle's maintenance history. @bobdog asked for clarification about the '16H' cast iron cylinder heads, indicating curiosity about the technical specifications. @Warjon (The Seller) provided detailed information regarding the advantages of the cast iron heads over the original aluminum ones, which may contribute to potential buyers' understanding of the vehicle's attributes.
Negative: On the other hand, comments with a negative slant included @OutOfMyElement questioning @mustang1965’s assertion about no reserve in the auction, highlighting some confusion around the auction terms. Also, @petershobbyshop raised a concern about the engine's performance in hot weather. These remarks show that while there is admiration for the car, questions about its operational reliability remain among prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @T0mekk expressed enthusiasm by calling the vehicle "Sweeeeeet!", and @Beef1020 praised it, questioning about the paint readings while implying it looks like a great car. @Dspoljaric shared a positive personal experience, considering it one of the best sports cars for its speed and handling, emphasizing fun factor when driven with the top down. @Crovet complemented the car's performance and suitability as a daily vehicle for those who desire an engaging drive, celebrating the craftsmanship of its S54 engine and chassis.
Neutral: Several commenters focused on technical aspects and sought clarity. @RTE appreciated the seller's transparency regarding imperfections in a video and inquired about further details on paintwork, while @Johann remarked on the car's interior aesthetic and driving qualities, noting the importance of proper maintenance records. @Klondajk asked about documentation, and @collectibleclassics (The Seller) responded regarding the car's records and condition, assuring that fresh oil and filter were included without visible signs of previous damage.
Negative: Comments from users like @DarrellR and @tomcolt3 raised concerns about the vehicle's condition, pointing out unusual paint readings and questioning multiple alignments conducted shortly apart. @FerRrari disagreed with others on the car's daily usability, citing the Z4M's stiff suspension as a drawback, and raised doubts about comfort levels. @claganga mentioned possible missing under panels, eliciting further discussion on the car's integrity and condition, with @Randy_Forbes providing an example of a similar issue.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed fondness for the vehicle, highlighting its cultural significance as a former CHP cruiser. @Wob (The Seller) noted its appeal for collectors, stating that it’s 'super cool' and perfect for vintage car enthusiasts. @Danno9 praised the car, reminiscing about their service and the authentic experience it provides. Several users, including @Ypss36 and @Danno9, shared positive personal anecdotes about being pulled over in similar vehicles, indicating a nostalgia for the CHP vehicles and how they contributed to memorable experiences on the road.
Neutral: Commenters raised questions about the vehicle's features and usage legality. @svt93cobra inquired about the reason for its resale, while others like @JacquesMerde and @JLFaria discussed specifics like the functionality of the speedometer and historical details regarding law enforcement practices. The comments also reflect varying opinions on the vehicle's practicality and effectiveness during its service, with mention of the CHP's choice of vehicle over the years and how these cars were utilized in different law enforcement roles.
Negative: Some users expressed skepticism and concerns regarding the legality and practicality of owning a vintage police car. @lewisfoto pointed out potential legal issues in California, suggesting it may be against the law to drive this vehicle on the street, which was countered by @Wob (The Seller), insisting that it’s legal under specific conditions. Additionally, @carelallen noted the limited mileage during the current ownership, questioning why someone would buy such a car but not drive it often, while @Fleche_dOr shared negative sentiments about the vehicles themselves, indicating they were not as well-liked during their time in service.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as a beauty and appreciates the layout, design details, and finishes. @CarFoolLane expresses excitement about the potential of traveling long distances and enjoying all the comforts onboard. @Cadivend (The Seller) mentions that the leisure travel RVs are great for two people traveling in comfort, comparing it to a studio apartment on wheels, and emphasizes that it is small enough to drive almost anywhere while offering all the necessary amenities.
Neutral: Several commenters are seeking specific information about the vehicle. @MarkTheSharkNYC inquires about service history documentation and potential issues with the dashboard. @MitchOH requests pictures of the slide-out and roof, while @MikeDFW asks about the type of propane tank and if the infotainment system supports Apple CarPlay. @Lubedude1 and @Keebler73 have also asked about the vehicle's height and dimensions, indicating interest in storage options.
Negative: There are concerns and unanswered questions from some users. @Monopolychris expresses frustration over not receiving a reply to direct inquiries regarding the vehicle's usage history. @TJP wishes for the two recliners to offer additional sleeping space, while @Ronrooney questions if there have been any leaks and mentions a need for roof photos. Additionally, @Wandering_Lens questions the nature of a possible stain in a picture, prompting doubts about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @ron67 (The Seller) expressed enthusiasm about the auction, emphasizing the rarity and low mileage of the Silverado, which has garnered positive attention from bidders. @ManyWinters, who owns a similar truck, supported the seller's statement about the Silverado being a reliable vehicle with minimal upkeep required. @Spunkyturtle also contributed a positive comment on the vehicle's appeal, describing it as a 'slick ride.'
Neutral: @SGTJDR requested better photos of specific areas of the truck, indicating potential interest while seeking more information before making a decision. @yardbird221 asked logistical questions about viewing the truck, showing interest in the vehicle but needing clarity on how to proceed with a visit. @Nautique99 asked about any potential odors and the age of the tires, illustrating common concerns among prospective buyers.
Negative: @CalvadaKing raised a concern about the truck's features, specifically questioning the presence of a driver's power seat, which could indicate a discrepancy in the listing information. This led @bringatrailer to acknowledge the issue and update the listing accordingly. While most comments were generally positive, this raised questions about the vehicle's completeness and could affect some buyers' perceptions.
|
 |
Positive: @sapphirexae (The Seller) expresses genuine fondness for the vehicle, emphasizing it as a beautiful and clean CLK Cabriolet. The seller has taken pride in its maintenance, assuring that every feature and function works as intended. Additionally, the seller provides detailed service records and mentions professional interior care, including conditioning the leather and regular cleaning, which contributes to the overall appeal of the car.
Neutral: Several buyers, including @adam_bishop and @SoGi, ask specific questions about the vehicle's original parts, service history, and functionality. @adam_bishop inquires about the original wheels and whether the vehicle can be held for pickup later, while @SoGi requests information about mechanical conditions and specific systems like the convertible top hydraulics. The seller addresses these inquiries thoughtfully, revealing that while the original wheels are unavailable, he possesses the original radio unit, and emphasizes that all mechanical systems are in good working order.
Negative: There are no overtly negative comments about the vehicle or its condition, though some prospective buyers seek clarification on potential issues such as stains or mechanical anomalies. @SoGi raises concerns about the functioning of various electrical systems and the condition of the hydraulic system, indicating that buyers are eager to confirm everything is in top-notch shape before proceeding. However, @sapphirexae reassures them with thorough responses and has no reported issues, portraying confidence in the car's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz called the vehicle a cool Carolina Bronco and complimented its nice build. @MCrestorations also recognized it as a cool Bronco, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @MTbronco appreciated the extensive work put into the vehicle, remarking that it turned out nicely and would be a great ride for someone.
Neutral: @68mustangshelby raised concerns regarding areas with missing bedliner material on the hood and the condition of the seam sealer on the door jamb pillars. In response, @AllGoodNamesRGone (The Seller) explained that the hood was repaired after it sustained damage and that wear on the pillars was due to usage as a daily driver in various climates. The seller also mentioned various upgrades and repairs made to the vehicle, including wiring and additional parts included with the sale, and noted commitment to repairing a faulty injector to ensure proper performance.
Negative: @68mustangshelby voiced a concern that potential bidders would have to calculate the costs of hood repairs themselves, which could deter bidders. The seller acknowledged this, stating that it would be up to the buyer to assess what repairs and modifications they wished to undertake. There was also mention of weather wear on the paint, which could be seen as a drawback for some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Cheth20 commented on the vehicle's quality, noting that it seems like a nice example which suggests a positive impression. @mikakoty (The Seller) provided additional pictures and detailed that the car has been garage kept and driven only for pleasure, enhancing the vehicle's desirability. Included with the car are valuable items such as a cover and an original BMW Soft-top Care Kit, which further exemplifies the care the seller has taken.
Neutral: @Bruzzie echoed @Cheth20's sentiment about the quietness surrounding the vehicle, indicating curiosity without any strong bias. @EdenForbes expressed interest in seeing a video of the soft top operation, showing engagement with the listing but not providing explicit commentary on whether the vehicle is appealing or not.
Negative: @JonnyScience raised a concern regarding the smoking history of the car, which might suggest apprehension about the vehicle's condition. In response, @mikakoty (The Seller) assured that the car has not been smoked in, which is a positive clarification, yet it highlights a potential issue buyers might consider.
|
 |
Positive: @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) presents the 2004 Subaru Impreza WRXSTI as an incredible opportunity for bidders, highlighting its low mileage of just 32,000 miles and stating that the car has been well cared for throughout its life. Commenters like @Discobob and @Jkwest87 express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and performance, with @Discobob calling it sweet and @Jkwest87 declaring it his dream car. Overall, commenters show excitement for the vehicle's unique features, including its color and condition, with @LoudNotFast noting its immaculate appearance.
Neutral: Several comments from @scoobysouth and others point out specific modifications and potential maintenance concerns regarding the vehicle. @scoobysouth suggests verifying the aftermarket parts and raises questions about the tires and timing belt maintenance, indicating that such details are important to prospective buyers. @michaelmotorcar, in response, acknowledges the inquiries and notes that he is waiting for the previous owner to provide more information about certain parts, showing engagement with the bidding community.
Negative: On the downside, @scoobysouth articulates concerns over the lack of maintenance records and the aging of some parts, implying that they could add unexpected expenses for the future buyer. The comments regarding potential issues under the bug deflector by @RR2017 emphasize worries about hidden damage that could affect the vehicle's value. @michaelmotorcar tries to alleviate some concerns by standing behind the car's quality but does admit to certain limitations regarding service records and specific mechanical evaluations, which some potential bidders may find unsatisfactory.
|
 |
Positive: @Gmmuscleusa highlights the uniqueness of the vehicle, emphasizing that the combination of a yellow exterior with a gray interior is rare, which adds to its appeal. Additionally, @ShifterKartDude brings attention to the upgraded seating options, hinting at the vehicle's high-end features which may attract buyers looking for luxury. Knowledgeable comments from @briman130 also offer insights into the vehicle’s pricing and configurations, reinforcing the idea that it is a well-equipped model.
Neutral: There are inquiries about the vehicle's history and specifics, with @Maxxam63 requesting the original window sticker for options and MSRP, while @JLinFL discusses the color combination and its potential override status related to pricing. These comments reflect users' curiosity about the car's value and options. Moreover, @mg77459 speculates on the car's previous ownership and sales process, indicating that it might have been a demo vehicle driven by the dealership owner before being sent to auction, which is common in the industry.
Negative: There are concerns among commenters about various aspects of the sale process. @59soldus23 criticizes dealer doc fees, suggesting they diminish the dealership's reputation. Similarly, @CaptJack22 raises a question about a potentially problematic entry on the Carfax report, suggesting that the vehicle's auction history at two years old might not be ideal. These issues could lead potential buyers to tread cautiously, given the implications for the vehicle's past and associated costs.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments express a strong affinity for the vehicle, appreciating its unique qualities and open-air design. @theoriginalMontyCrisco highlights the joy of driving it on highways, evoking a sense of freedom and adventure. @rizzle admits to an inexplicable fondness for the car despite its need for extensive repairs, while @Some_shmoe envisions it as a fun, care-free vehicle for leisurely drives around town. Even comments like @beerman99 emphasize the car's surprising nature, suggesting it might be just what some enthusiasts are looking for.
Neutral: Comments like those from @jgrifCA1969, who is also the seller, provide practical insights about the car's history and condition. The seller clarifies the vehicle's conversion from hardtop to roadster, touches on its maintenance history, and explains various parts and features. Questions from users such as @Davyd and @mvandekamp focus on details regarding the frame and structural modifications, indicating a mix of curiosity and practical concerns without strong emotional bias toward the car.
Negative: On the downside, some commentators express skepticism or concern about the car's overall condition. @ZGChris portrays the vehicle in a somewhat negative light, unsure of its appeal. @SingleClutch shares disappointment at not finding anything appealing beyond the privacy glass, while @Noisyboyz questions the lack of photos showing the top up, implying a lack of completeness in the listing. @thinkfuture cites potential issues with practicality when it comes to weather, particularly rain, highlighting concerns that could deter prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express excitement and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its rarity and stunning design. @CBar5 describes it as a 'stunner', while @ToniBetoni and @LenordY both compliment its aesthetic. @septicore also describes it as 'cool', and sentiments like 'Wow, what an automobile!' from @rmorin49 indicate a strong appreciation for its overall appeal. @Jerm757 notes that the car is a showstopper that should have received a premium listing, reflecting the general enthusiasm around this particular model. Additionally, @Vax appreciates the seller's passion and dedication to the car, acknowledging the quality of restoration work done.
Neutral: Comments reveal technical curiosities and inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifications. @RichDD shows interest in the protection package, while @Timbered clarifies that the vehicle has double-pane glass for sound rather than security. Others like @brannman and @JimClem inquire about specific features and functionality of the car, such as the trunk mechanism and storage options. @3Pedalonly offers a detailed description of the vehicle's luxurious features, exemplifying the fine craftsmanship that characterizes this model. Sellers like @Frankieflowerz respond to various questions with insight about the car's modifications and history, contributing to a generally positive dialogue regarding the vehicle's features.
Negative: Some comments convey skepticism around the seller's investment and the car's pricing. @Minicooper2000 hints at the financial aspect of purchasing the vehicle, implying that the seller may be engaging in dubious practices regarding profit. Various users such as @jinton and @LevelM counter these concerns by asserting the significant effort and investment put into the car's restoration. A few comments express doubts about the necessity of explaining the vehicle's condition to critics, suggesting that the car's high quality is self-evident to true enthusiasts. Overall, while there are valid concerns about pricing, most commentors appear to respect the seller's passion and the car's appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its stunning build and beautiful design. @Mike9000ft remarked on the exceptional quality of the build and inquired about engine specifications and dyno results. Similarly, @marticulous and @Wheresthetrail expressed a desire for more detailed information, particularly dyno results and a driving video to showcase the car's performance. @Gmmuscleusa complimented the vehicle's sinister look, while @Heavychevss highlighted the craftsmanship from a known builder, praising the stance and overall appearance of the car.
Neutral: Several comments focused on practical inquiries and suggestions related to the vehicle. @Bay1994, the seller, provided updates about the vehicle's dyno results, clarifying the horsepower and torque figures after some initial confusion. He also detailed the post-build updates and repairs made during the car's use, indicating diligence in maintaining the vehicle in excellent condition. Others, like @MARKOR1, raised logistical questions about transportation and tariffs when shipping the car to the U.S., showing practical interest along with admiration for the build.
Negative: A few comments indicated potential concerns related to the vehicle's driving capabilities and the current condition of the roads, as noted by @shadyspeed and @Michael1379 who mentioned the driving video that couldn't be produced due to bad weather conditions. Additionally, @Michael1379's second comment was flagged as non-constructive by other users, illustrating that not all feedback was positive or well-received. The discussion of tariffs and taxes introduced some uncertainty among potential buyers, with various users speculating on the complexities of shipping vintage vehicles across borders.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle for its unique design and features. @OutOfMyElement noted the car's cool factor, while @Lilptr appreciated the rarity of its color combination. Many expressed admiration for the practicality and fun driving experience provided by the i3, with @Chromantix mentioning how the vehicle's interior design and nimbleness made short commutes enjoyable. The seller, @genevamotorcars, also mentioned excellent battery health and that there are no fault codes in the system, which seemed to reassure potential buyers.
Neutral: Inquiry about the vehicle's range was common; for example, @Getwhitit asked about maximum range, and @Danbeau provided insights on historical range figures. The discussion also included comments about battery life and cycles. @KJLaBry questioned the battery's age and charge cycles while @Midengineracer contributed a counterpoint about battery treatment and conditions affecting lifespan. Overall, there was a mix of qualitative opinions around battery health and expected performance, with @bwicarnut emphasizing the need for accurate range representation when fully charged.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's long-term maintenance and repair costs emerged in conversations. @AllClaSS pointed out that used BMW i3s have known problems that can complicate repairs, emphasizing that not many mechanics are familiar with these vehicles. @beNGK raised caution about potential issues with the carbon roof delaminating and AC compressor failure, indicating costly repairs might arise. Moreover, @SoGi highlighted a possible discrepancy in the mileage reported in the Carfax, raising concerns about transparency in the car's history.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its appeal and high quality, with @boaboyoz describing the 996.2 Cabriolet in Carrara White as a 'delight' and a 'classy example.' @drjoesc believes this model represents the current 'entry level Porsche,' indicating it will bring happiness to its new owner. The condition of the car is praised, particularly by @vifferx, who admires the beautiful beige interior, noting how hard it is to find well-maintained 996 models. Several users, including @rchew68 and @Ravdey, also appreciate the driving experience it offers, expressing their admiration for the vehicle and suggesting its value will only increase over time.
Neutral: Other comments are more technical and informative, focusing on the mechanical aspects of the car. @innuendo000 raises concerns about the potential for engine issues, specifically regarding IMS failures and bore scoring, which are common topics for discussion in the Porsche community. @JGordon5454 seeks clarity about bore scoring issues related to the M96/996 engine and appreciates the need for knowledge sharing among enthusiasts. The seller responds positively, assuring potential buyers of the vehicle's well-maintained status and inviting them for a Pre-Purchase Inspection (PPI). Information shared by @Segura911 about engine care, along with experiences from fellow commenters, suggests a communal effort to educate on best practices for maintaining the car.
Negative: Some comments express concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and maintenance history, particularly relating to engine issues. @innuendo000's inquiry about past engine problems indicates distrust about the seller's honesty regarding the vehicle's health. Others share reservations stemming from known problems with certain Porsche models, reflecting skepticism as to whether the maintenance has indeed been sufficient. Although the seller does address some concerns and expresses confidence in the car's condition, the queries from potential buyers indicate ongoing anxiety regarding the reliability and longevity associated with the specific model.
|
 |
Positive: @Bmarcum expressed excitement about the auction for the black/black 90 ZR-1, noting its good mileage and suggesting it has plenty of life left, which he finds appealing. @JB1971SX remarked on the beauty of the older Corvette models, appreciating the simplicity of their body lines. @Prokill1 described the car as beautiful and cool, indicating he might be interested in staying engaged with the auction. @TexWatson praised the vehicle's engine, highlighting its uniqueness and performance.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) provided detailed information about the auction process, helping potential buyers understand the advantages of purchasing from their dealership. They confirmed that the car includes the fitted top, addressing @Msirel's query about additional parts. @SSmith2020 and @KMFViper10 asked specific questions about the windshield and paint quality, to which the seller provided satisfactory answers.
Negative: @yellowc7vert corrected a misconception regarding the specifications of the ZR-1, indicating that all 1990 models came standard with the Z51 Performance Handling Package. While discussing engine lineage, there was a debate between @TexWatson and @F1Guy about the design origins of the engine used in the ZR-1, whereby @yellowc7vert asserted that the two engines are not directly related contrary to what others claimed. Additionally, @NCRSmaniac mentioned that the auction car was pristine but likely to attract high bids, indicating concerns over the competition affecting final sale prices.
|
 |
Positive: @Dannyautoauction232 (The Seller) noted that the FJ Cruiser is in good condition despite some surface rust originating from its time in Germany, where road salts are commonly used. @JonnyRotorhead praised the vehicle's appearance, describing it as 'awesome' and expressed eagerness to bid if it were more local. The seller responded positively to inquiries about vehicle specifics, showing a willingness to provide additional photos and address potential buyer concerns.
Neutral: @KZN185Surf commented on the rust coming from Germany due to military road treatments, noting it doesn't look too bad. @Dannyautoauction232 (The Seller) confirmed this, stating that while the rust is fairly minimal, he wasn't overly concerned about it at the time of purchase. Additionally, he mentioned that he would provide requested information and updates to reassure potential buyers about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: There were inquiries regarding the alignment of the steering wheel versus the wheels themselves, which raised some concerns about the vehicle's condition. @JonnyRotorhead specifically pointed out the steering wheel appearing turned in photos, suggesting a misalignment. Although @Dannyautoauction232 (The Seller) offered to clarify and provide additional photos, this discrepancy slightly detracted from buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @erictlukas praises the color combination of the vehicle, noting its seductive and addicting nature. @JB_Tx shares admiration for the mocha black paint, mentioning how it shines in different lighting conditions. He also compliments the tri-color interior and maple trim, stating that this edition draws compliments, particularly from women. Overall, there's a consensus about the beauty and allure of the car's design.
Neutral: @gscharnagl raises practical concerns about the functionality of the seat features as well as the lack of an original sticker, highlighting the importance of verifying whether all dynamic functions work correctly. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, has assured that the seat functions operate as expected and has attempted to pursue the possibility of obtaining a reproduction sticker from Mercedes-Benz. Additionally, @Moodmann inquires about potential issues with coil packs, receiving reassurance from the seller about the current condition of the vehicle's engine and title status.
Negative: Concerns have been expressed about the vehicle's low mileage, with @jradcliffe questioning its service history over eight years, suggesting a potential reset of mileage or lack of maintenance. @MaxDry notes a visible oil leak from the ABC strut, indicating a need for repairs, which the seller has acknowledged and promised to address. However, there remains skepticism about the vehicle's overall condition due to its peculiar service history, with some commenters expressing that such factors influence their interest in the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the vehicle's impressive rarity and heritage, with @Dollycat3 noting its long family ownership and @Sjalabais referring to it as a "spectacular gem". Many users appreciate the build quality and longevity of the car, like @hr47cars who argues that nothing built in the last decade will last as long. @jor praises its understated elegance, calling it a classic choice for collectors. The supportive comments about the seller, such as from @jimlam56 who encourages potential buyers to buy confidently, further emphasize a positive sentiment around the vehicle's value.
Neutral: Commenters like @ein460 raise questions about the vehicle's condition, suggesting engine compression measurements might be necessary due to its mileage, though this was somewhat alleviated by comments referencing the service report. @RogerD offers insights into recent maintenance, expressing curiosity about what is involved in the recommissioning process. Others, like @bondgraham, present a balanced view concerning the car's original components and modifications, mentioning minor repairs and the need for thorough inspections, indicating varying levels of condition awareness among commenters.
Negative: There are also some concerns raised regarding the vehicle. Users like @bondgraham and @neilpierson25 pointed out potential issues, including non-original parts and the need for repairs like replacing shifter bushings. @Bobror highlighted a mismatch with the vehicle's hubcaps as mentioned in the description. Additionally, there are concerns regarding rust repair and the overall thoroughness of inspections, suggesting that while the car has charm and character, buyers should approach with some caution.
|
 |
Positive: @Darren appreciates the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle, describing it as 'very nice-looking' with reasonable mileage. @ssolano2002 also finds the jeep interesting, noting the unique tire design that supports the University of Alabama. @Carjunkie25 (The Seller) states that the Jeep has been well-maintained throughout its 25-year history, having been kept in a car port or garage, which indicates good care taken by the family.
Neutral: @kief94 expresses a practical interest in the vehicle's shipping capabilities and inquires about specific operational conditions, such as overheating history and the state of the rear main seal. @Carjunkie25 (The Seller) notes that they have included photos of the rust in the gallery, clarifying that only surface rust on the undercarriage is visible, which may help potential buyers assess the vehicle's condition without concern.
Negative: @aviones1 suggests that the listing could be improved by including more pictures, particularly of areas prone to rust. This indicates a potential concern about transparency regarding the vehicle's condition. Furthermore, @kief94's questions about overheating history and oil leaks suggest apprehension about the vehicle's potential mechanical problems.
|
 |
Positive: The H1, featuring a Duramax conversion, has garnered praise for its overall appearance and robust modifications. @BJXH1, the seller, has addressed numerous queries from potential buyers, confirming that the Duramax conversion was completed by Predator and providing details about upgrades, including new axles and enhanced cooling systems. Additionally, the vehicle is equipped with a high-performing Pioneer NAVI system that includes Bluetooth and a powerful amplifier, which contributes to a satisfying audio experience, pleasing potential buyers like @Need2ReturnSumVideotapes and @KWF89 who appreciate the sound quality and features.
Neutral: Several questions have arisen regarding the vehicle's towing capacity and functionality, especially from @dangreenfield and @Ignoramoose, who were interested in the physical setup and system integrations of the H1. @BJXH1 provided clarity on aspects like the mechanical shifting for four-wheel drive and the installation of lockers, assuring buyers of the vehicle's capabilities. The seller also highlighted that the A/C system is independent of the driveline, which plays a role in maintaining optimal cabin conditions, particularly during the heat in areas like California, which @Ignoramoose corroborated from their own experiences.
Negative: Concerns surfaced about maintenance issues, particularly regarding the gearbox and transfer case operations. @VideoTapes noted previous overheating incidents and sought reassurance about the vehicle's reliability after extensive towing. @BJXH1 revealed the complexities of the transfer case rebuilds due to driver error rather than mechanical faults, which may raise red flags for potential buyers about the vehicle's past. Furthermore, issues like dry-rotting hoses and improper connections reported by @BJXH1 may indicate a necessity for vigilant ongoing maintenance going forward.
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics highlights the high standards of their dealership, promoting a 4.9/5.0 Google Reviews rating and the expertise in sourcing unique vehicles from private sellers. They offer smooth, transparent transactions and welcome inspections through trusted local shops, demonstrating their commitment to customer satisfaction and transparency. The seller also reassures potential buyers that the vehicle is in excellent condition, sharing confidence in its maintenance and readiness for immediate use.
Neutral: @gweaver raises important questions regarding the vehicle's history, specifically probing for any signs of previous smoking or lingering odors, as well as concerns about possible damage from a prior accident affecting the muffler and surrounding structure. These inquiries indicate a cautious approach from buyers who are interested in understanding every aspect of the vehicle's condition before making a decision. The seller responds positively, confirming there are no known issues and assuring the vehicle's performance and recent maintenance history.
Negative: Questions surrounding the vehicle's past, particularly from @gweaver, indicate potential concerns regarding its integrity and maintenance history. The mention of a possible muffler replacement due to a rear-end accident introduces doubts about any structural damage, suggesting that while the seller is confident, some potential buyers may still carry apprehensions. Such concerns highlight the need for thorough inspections and transparency in the vehicle's history.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight several positive aspects of the 2007 Mercedes Benz R320 CDI, particularly its features and maintenance. @aegmotorsports provides detailed information about the vehicle's specifications, including the premium features such as the COMAND infotainment system, power liftgate, and Harman Kardon sound system. Additionally, the reassurance regarding the headliner repair being a common issue among German vehicles adds to the confidence potential buyers may feel. @steverosenzweig even shares a fun fact about the vehicle's cupholder design, implying a positive and quirky aspect that enhances its appeal.
Neutral: There are several neutral inquiries concerning the vehicle's specifics and functionalities. Buyers like @Gpol and @Midengineracer raise questions about the vehicle's ownership history and service records, while @pongdog inquires about the need for DEF (Diesel Exhaust Fluid), indicating a level of awareness about diesel vehicle maintenance. These questions suggest that potential buyers are gathering more information rather than expressing strong opinions, with the seller, @aegmotorsports, responding promptly and transparently to these inquiries, maintaining a professional tone throughout.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's prior ownership and specific repairs. @Gpol questions the implications of having five previous owners, wondering if the vehicle was frequently flipped, which could suggest potential quality issues. Moreover, @Dleebr's inquiry about the headliner replacement hints at concern over prior leaks, while @birdmanross's question about the entertainment system suggests buyers are cautious about missing components like headphones. Overall, these comments indicate some skepticism regarding the vehicle's history and conditions that need clarification.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the 2004 Volvo V70 for its aesthetics and comfort. @Schworer compliments the 'beautiful' nature of the car and shares his own positive experience with a similar model. @MtConstitution recalls a favorable long-term ownership experience, highlighting its comfort and reliability, which led to great highway mileage. @Oldnfast expresses a preference for this non-turbo model as a daily driver due to its rarity and low mileage, while @dondogs notes that the engine is peppy enough without the need for additional modifications.
Neutral: The discussion also addresses some technical details and questions about the vehicle. @LordVenn inquires about installing an aftermarket turbo, suggesting curiosity among enthusiasts about performance upgrades. Comments from @mjcoolinc and @ppch628 clarify misunderstandings about engine types, with @mjcoolinc claiming his own 2004 V70 had a turbo engine, and @ppch628 emphasizing the fun power of the current model without requiring extensive modifications. The seller, @VantageAuto, provides reassurances regarding the car’s condition, service history, and delivery options while inviting bids on the no-reserve auction.
Negative: However, not all comments are completely positive. @Oldnfast points out that the passenger seat does not match the listing description regarding power adjustments, suggesting possible inconsistencies in the seller's claims. The comment from @bozman raises a question about the previous ownership turnover, hinting at a potential issue or lack of satisfaction that led to quick ownership changes. @samuelcdupont seeks clarification on the maintenance records, which could indicate concerns about the vehicle's upkeep and history.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the 2010 Porsche Panamera S, particularly regarding its black-on-black aesthetic, which many find appealing. @halfthrottle mentions that the black color is exceptional, while @AriGold23 praises the vehicle's overall appearance. Additionally, @StyleCars (The Seller) provides thorough details about the car's performance, comfort features, and service history, which further emphasizes its value and allure to potential buyers. The seller also offers nationwide shipping, making it accessible for a wider audience, which is positively received by commenters.
Neutral: Several commenters have asked questions regarding specific aspects of the vehicle, indicating a general interest in its condition. @Btrachten inquires about the Carfax reported damage, while @Mackan99 seeks clarification on perceived issues within particular photos. @bones302 expresses curiosity about maintenance records and @Josedluca raises concerns about the center console finish. All inquiries are met with diplomatic and informative responses from the seller, maintaining a professional and transparent dialogue about the vehicle's status and history.
Negative: Concerns have surfaced around certain cosmetic features of the vehicle. @Josedluca pointed out the condition of the center console, suggesting significant scratches, while @bones302 echoed worries about suspension noises during a video demo. There are also questions regarding potential damage reported on the Carfax, with some uncertainty noted regarding previous maintenance records. However, @StyleCars (The Seller) reassures commenters by reiterating that no major issues exist and commits to addressing these concerns by providing more detailed information and additional photographs to clarify the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @CJBrown25 shared a glowing review of the LA Exotics Cobra, praising its power, sound, and the attention it garners while driving. The comment highlights the enjoyment and excitement of owning such a car, providing a positive endorsement for potential bidders. Additionally, @67numberfive (The Seller) reassured interest in the auction by promising a driving video once the weather permits, inviting an engaging and lively atmosphere around the auction.
Neutral: @BMVeyie made inquiries about the vehicle's smog certification, indicating that it is necessary for California buyers, to which @67numberfive (The Seller) responded affirmatively, stating that it would come with a current smog certification. The seller also noted the cosmetic condition of the vehicle, mentioning the need for new carpets and tires, demonstrating transparency about the car's needs. @glfrench51 sought more information about the car's original construction and specifications, reflecting buyer interest in the quality and history of the vehicle.
Negative: @BMVeyie pointed out the need for clarity regarding any cosmetic or mechanical issues with the Cobra, suggesting curiosity about the car's maintenance. @Cdn043 raised a safety concern regarding the handle on the fire extinguisher, questioning its functionality while driving. This highlights potential issues that could deter buyers, and @67numberfive (The Seller) addressed the comment, explaining the design yet implying that a modification could improve functionality. Overall, while the car has its positive attributes, there are some concerns that need to be attended to.
|
 |
Positive: @mike_747 shared the excitement about the vehicle, noting its low mileage and appealing features. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) emphasized the quality of service provided by their dealership, highlighting their high customer ratings and commitment to smooth transactions. They also reassured potential buyers by offering inspection options and logistics support, asserting that the vehicle is in excellent condition with no signs of corrosion.
Neutral: There were discussions about the estimated auction price, with @mike_747 originally predicting around $27K, but later acknowledging that the vehicle might sell for lower amounts like $20K based on market observations. @gscharnagl pointed out the past auction price of $23,250, suggesting a reasonable expectation for this sale as well. @Whozurdady1 inquired about the circumstances leading to the vehicle being relisted, to which @Collectibleclassics clarified that it was due to the previous bidder defaulting on their purchase.
Negative: Several commenters raised concerns about the vehicle, particularly @jradcliffe, who doubted the higher valuation predictions and noted that similar models were selling for lower prices. @Tonehound mentioned potential issues with the single key fob and the costs of replacing its battery, drawing attention to a common concern among buyers. @Calbigsurf expressed worry about safety recalls and requested information on the vehicle's maintenance history, specifically inquiring about the status of airbag repairs.
|
 |
Positive: Several commentators praised the vehicle's aesthetics, with @GDogg calling it a "Great looking Turbo SE" and @azdgordon noting its beauty. @Jags_in_the_barn mentioned a personal nostalgic experience driving a similar model, describing the Esprit Turbo as a "revelation". @dahli expressed enjoyment over looking at the car, appreciating the mechanics involved and stating that it seems like all the power accessories work well.
Neutral: Comments expressed a mix of observations and inquiries about the car's condition and features. @BESCFAN suggested that better pictures of the seats and overall condition would be helpful. @PepeLePewDeux questioned the relevance of including a road test for a different model year, while @A_McDonald asked for videos of the vehicle starting and driving, showing interest without strong opinions.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car's condition and functionality. @dahli highlighted confusion about the inoperative odometer and the need for clarification on its history, emissions systems, and the charge cooler pump. @SixteenVentiler observed potential issues with paint and leather conditions on higher mileage vehicles. Additionally, @951ltwt sought information regarding the last timing belt service and the functionality of the gauges, raising doubts about the vehicle's overall maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the impressive pedigree of @HondaProJason's 2023 Honda Civic Type R, noting the high level of care and customization that has gone into the vehicle. @cwfl5ctr emphasizes the meticulous attention to detail that @HondaProJason maintains in his vehicles, asserting that the next owner will surely be satisfied. @tysonhugie praises both the car and @HondaProJason's passion for the Honda brand, suggesting that this Civic Type R is not only a special performance vehicle but also a future collectible. @MooshiPirpy14 and @old_merc add to this sentiment, describing the car as a blast to drive and noting the overall high quality of the build, while others comment on the unique aspects of the car, including its one-of-a-kind modifications and exhaust sound.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @psilla69 and @wmo168, ask about the inclusion of original parts in the sale, indicating a standard curiosity about modifications in such vehicles. @Swoope seeks clarification on the specifics of the exhaust system, and @meatman2000 inquires about California smog legality, which are important considerations for potential buyers. @Driv300mph questions the absence of dyno charts, while @casapao seeks clarification on necessary updates made to the vehicle, further indicating the vehicle's unique history as a modified example of the Civic Type R.
Negative: Some negative remarks arise regarding the absence of certain original components included in the sale, with @wmo168 specifically wondering about OEM wheels and tires. @burkhard points out the lack of all-wheel drive, which could deter some buyers seeking performance metrics typical of AWD cars. @Chalk992911S comments on the absence of performance videos that might further endorse the vehicle's modifications and capabilities, and @Driv300mph questions the credibility of the claimed power without dyno evidence. This highlights a potential concern for buyers regarding documentation and proof of performance modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @ZigMeister60 expressed a nostalgic fondness for the Lotus Europa, reminiscing about a friend's car from high school and the excitement of having a Boss 302 engine swapped into it. The comments about the vehicle often highlight its exceptional handling abilities, with @JPSO86 stating that after driving a Europa, you would feel like all other cars handle like trucks. @kona agreed, describing their S2 model as a car that defies the laws of physics, stating it surpasses everything else on the road. @Blizzard340 shared a personal story about their experience with a Europa and noted it could be a great project for someone. Several other users also shared their enthusiasm for the potential of this vehicle as a restoration project, with @bhhumphrey calling it a "fantastic labor of love project."
Neutral: There were practical discussions about the car's condition and restoration requirements. @PittsSpecial asked about potential damage to the chassis, while @lotus7guy noted that some parts seemed to be a plug-and-play kit similar to original specifications. @loudoun raised concerns regarding the vehicle's title complications when registering it in North Carolina, reflecting on past experiences with the state's registration office. @MJSheldon1 (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the car's condition, assuring potential buyers that there were no accident damages. The restoration process was acknowledged as both a labor of love and an endeavor that could be time-consuming and costly, leading users like @feynmanfan to comment on the difficulties that come with sourcing parts to complete such a project.
Negative: Some users expressed concerns regarding practical challenges associated with the Lotus Europa. @packardv8 humorously reflected on his inability to fit into the vehicle, describing it as a ride with limitations based on size. @loudoun shared frustrations about communication issues when trying to arrange to view the car, highlighting a lack of response that could deter interest. Additionally, discussions about the complexities in registration and possible discrepancies in paperwork raised a red flag for some potential buyers, particularly @loudoun who worried about complications with the North Carolina DMV, especially with a Florida title in play.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the vehicle's unique qualities, particularly its all-Ford construction, which @Moto4 points out as a strong selling point. They see potential in the vehicle being easy to drive and work on, with @newcarpro expressing interest in bringing it across the country. @Joseph7 (The Seller) shares personal experiences driving the car to work and highlights the joy it brings others, with people often laughing and connecting it with cultural references like Chitty Chitty Bang Bang and the Beverly Hillbillies.
Neutral: Several technical questions about the vehicle are raised, such as the current bolt pattern of the wheels, which @2ndGenGenovese inquired about. @Joseph7 (The Seller) responds, providing the bolt pattern of 5x5.5 inches and confirming that the speedometer and gauges are accurate and functional. There are also inquiries about the condition of the top mechanism and the hood, with @Joseph7 stating that neither is available. Additionally, @Dennis_Jimenez asks about the engine designation, leading to clarifications about the car’s engine being a 2.0 Pinto OHC.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the vehicle's completeness, especially the absence of the top mechanism and hood as noted by @schmluss. @Joseph7 (The Seller) confirms this limitation, which may deter potential buyers looking for a fully functioning vehicle. Despite its charm and uniqueness, the car's references to pop culture and fun anecdotes may not outweigh the practicality issues highlighted in these discussions.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered positive attention for being well-maintained since its purchase, with @bmercer emphasizing the extensive work done to ensure it runs like new. Commenters like @xjhigg praise the seller as a reputable member of the Northeast car community, highlighting the LR4's desirable options and features. Others have noted its solid condition with appropriate and honest representations of its state, along with appreciation for the transparency of the auction process, particularly mentioning the no reserve listing.
Neutral: Comments regarding the condition of the vehicle highlight a mix of appreciation and requests for clarification. @spess brought up potential issues with underbody shields and rust treatment, suggesting that while it looks good, there are areas needing attention. @Challenger22 indicated that the overall interior looks good but stressed the importance of maintenance and inquired about specific repairs that had been done, showing that while the vehicle is appealing, there's an acknowledgment of potential concerns that future owners should be aware of.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the vehicle's history and specific maintenance issues, with @BostonCarGuy questioning the past use and @spess requesting details about brake functionality and carfax entries. @Challenger22 pointed out the lack of underbody shields and indications of salt damage, suggesting that the vehicle might need more extensive maintenance than initially apparent. Several users are eager for videos of the vehicle's driving capabilities, indicating a desire for more evidence of its current condition and any issues it may have.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express great admiration for the 2009 Porsche 911 Carrera 4S Cabriolet being auctioned. @Jacksunoco noted it offers excellent value, describing it as a 'rock solid' car that is powerful and easy for DIY maintenance. @smcgurk1 appreciated the extensive photos provided, highlighting how well the car is presented. Furthermore, Collectibleclassics, the seller, emphasized the vehicle's well-maintained condition, mentioning a recent service and reliable performance, showcasing confidence in the car's quality.
Neutral: Collectibleclassics has been very transparent about the vehicle's service history, noting that no additional records were available when they acquired it. @Shadwin inquired specifically about the PDK service as well as AWD maintenance and suspension service, which Collectibleclassics addressed by confirming they were obtaining more information from the prior owner. The seller has kept potential buyers informed about the condition of the car and has opened the opportunity for pre-purchase inspections, indicating a willingness to accommodate serious inquiries.
Negative: Despite the vehicle's positives, concerns have been raised regarding the gaps in the service history, which @smcgurk1 pointed out. Collectibleclassics acknowledged that some of the maintenance was not performed by Porsche and that the complete service records were missing. They also cautioned that, as with any older vehicle, potential issues could arise unexpectedly, creating a slight apprehension among prospective buyers about the car's long-term reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the Jeep's enjoyable driving experience and overall reliability. @GCEA (The Seller) emphasizes that the 2004 Jeep Wrangler Sport is equipped with a highly sought-after 4.0L inline-6 engine known for its durability. They note the Jeep drives very well, and even if it won't outpace other vehicles in races, it still has a strong performance. @Zukker922 confirms that the driving video shows the Jeep tracking straight with no shaking, further enhancing the positive perception of its driving capability.
Neutral: Several commenters express interest in additional information about the vehicle, including @Mikemchughes asking for specifics on the reported accident history. @alpineovernappa requests detailed frame pictures, which the seller promptly promises to provide. The discussion around the stock wheels reveals some buyers are considering alternative options, but @Notanothermiata receives quick responses from the seller regarding stock wheel availability, which reflects a willingness to maintain communication.
Negative: Criticism arises regarding the Jeep's ownership history, with @Notanothermiata expressing concern about the number of short-term owners before the current one. @HFogg also inquires why the current owner sold the vehicle soon after purchase. These comments indicate potential apprehension about the Jeep's reliability based on its ownership turnover, casting a slight shadow on its overall appeal despite the seller's reassurances about typical behavior for secondary or hobby vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @QueenElizabeth3 expressed admiration for the vehicle, indicating it is a great car that will do well. @Conman70 shared their positive experience with a similar model, praising its build quality and reliability, emphasizing that those who maintain it well will be rewarded. @bmdaia highlighted the bonkers build quality of the vehicle, reinforcing the sentiment that this model stands out among later generations of the series.
Neutral: @RogueMotorSports (The Seller) provided details about the vehicle's condition and features, confirming that it has low mileage and is in great shape overall, despite some known issues like the driver's seat stitching. They also addressed potential questions about the vehicle's features, mentioning that it includes KeylessGo and clarifying the availability of cargo covers and headrests. @dgardner55 asked about title transfer and licensing for out-of-state buyers, to which @RogueMotorSports (The Seller) responded with helpful information.
Negative: @DJL526Blue pointed out issues with the driver's seat cushion and discussed the process of replacing it, indicating a problem that could require attention. @jturk noted the absence of the cargo cover and headrests in pictures, raising concerns about what is included in the sale. @highlandmac inquired about service records, highlighting a potential lack of documented maintenance history, as @RogueMotorSports confirmed that the original owner performed service themselves but did not provide formal records.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its appealing features and condition. @devastator127 (The Seller) noted the truck's excellent condition for its age, reassuring potential buyers about its lack of significant rust and stating that it runs and drives fine. @atomic_tomcat complimented the truck's appearance, affirming it shows the hard work it has done, while @burda asked about dialing in the motor, suggesting an interest in making the vehicle perform better. @drjacquesstrappe nostalgically reminisced about the fun they would have with a vehicle like this, and @travytrav praised the overall look of the truck.
Neutral: The comments also contained various inquiries and clarifications about the truck's features. @blhuff1 questioned the positioning of the ignition, to which @devastator127 (The Seller) explained the prior owner's modifications. There were specific inquiries regarding the condition of the floorboards from @travytrav, who was reassured by @devastator127 that they remain in good shape with only a minor, repaired spot. There were discussions about the lap belts and improvements for engine performance, showing an engaged buyer community keen on understanding all aspects of the vehicle before potentially placing bids.
Negative: On the downside, there were mentions of minor concerns, particularly regarding the ignition setup as pointed out by @blhuff1, which indicated a previous wiring issue. Additionally, @aus92 raised a question about a ticking noise heard in a driving video, potentially indicating an exhaust leak, which may deter some buyers worried about underlying mechanical issues. Any uncertainty about the full functionality of the truck raised by various commenters could also contribute to hesitations in the bidding process, despite the overall positive sentiment surrounding its features.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are overwhelmingly impressed with the vehicle, praising it as a gem and marveling at its pristine condition. @GDogg describes it as a gem, while @cwhoyt refers to it as another low mileage diamond. @Longmire45 cheers the seller, calling it one of Bill's Gems, and @bulllwinkle expresses their excitement about the joy of driving such a large Lincoln. Features like comfortable seating and an inviting interior are often highlighted, with @HenryVal calling the seats better than any other he has seen. @borninthe60s mentions that the interior is as comfy as a living room couch, reflecting the luxury aspect of the vehicle.
Neutral: The discussions include logistical inquiries about vehicle features and options. @Chip55 wants to know about the tilt wheel and window sticker availability, while @Carguylongbeach inquires about the A/C system and coolant type. @Squarebodyaddict asks about the radio control setup, indicating a genuine interest in the car's functionality. Meanwhile, @Longmire45 engages in a friendly banter with the seller about other vehicles in their showroom, reflecting a community atmosphere among car enthusiasts. The seller, @Competitioncars, responds to these inquiries positively, indicating engagement and willingness to assist.
Negative: There are few negative comments, with some users expressing a hint of regret over not being able to purchase the vehicle due to financial constraints. @Ramenator mentions a lack of funds, which conveys a common desire to own such a classic. Additionally, @Carguylongbeach's concern over proper coolant use in restoration points to the careful attention needed for these vintage cars, hinting at potential issues that could arise if not maintained correctly. However, overall sentiments lean towards admiration rather than criticism.
|
 |
Positive: @VWTony appreciates the overall condition of the bus, suggesting it just needs a new home and possibly a valve adjustment. @MaicoCPA commends the decision to keep the original color, while @tinkertom believes it exemplifies the principle of 'Less is More'. @tlcamg finds the bus to be impressive in its great color, and hopes to drive it home, highlighting its appeal. @bondgraham calls it a true microbus in its pure state, free from unnecessary modifications. Additionally, @Ypss36 points out the small but notable detail of the fuel door key being in place, enhancing the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: @Luki expresses a straightforward comment noting that the vehicle is not just a van, to which @Sanuk counters by insisting it is 'ART'. @SpencerDeluxe contributes a poetic take, possibly reflecting on the cultural significance and personal stories associated with microbuses during the era of peace and love, adding a nostalgic tone to the comments. @tlcamg also expresses a personal preference for the chrome ash tray over painted ones, though it does not detract from the overall positive sentiment toward the bus.
Negative: There is a hint of concern in @tlcamg's comment regarding purists likely trying to find faults with the bus, reflecting a common perspective in collector circles. Acknowledging concerns about modifications, @tlcamg hopes the seller gets the appropriate value for the vehicle, suggesting that some may not fully appreciate its condition or worth. Overall, while there are minor reservations, the overwhelming sentiment leans positively towards the bus.
|
 |
Positive: @FelixNight1 praises the vehicle's "pure Mopar swagger" and highlights its big, smooth, and unapologetically American nature. @timandsons shares nostalgic memories of driving a Fury and fondly remembers its features, including the unique gunsights on the fenders. @hairyolds admires the car's nice and clean appearance, expressing hope that the auction brings good results, while @docMGL also appreciates the beauty of the vehicle, affirming its status among classic cars.
Neutral: @timandsons reminisces about his grandfather's experience with Furys, which adds a personal touch to the discussion around the car. @Evanbenson inquires about the car's operational details, specifically whether all windows function properly, reflecting a common interest in vehicle functionality. Despite the playful comments, such as @flyingdago's comparison of the car's front end to his teacher's expressions, others, like @carfan1978, raise practical concerns about the car's service history and invoice details, seeking clarity on the vehicle's maintenance records.
Negative: @carfan1978 questions the legitimacy of the engine work invoice's date, suggesting potential discrepancies in the reported service timeline. @AMXDude raises concerns about the vehicle running hot after a thermostat replacement, indicating possible mechanical issues. Additionally, @Evanbenson requests additional images of rear damage, implying that there may be unresolved damage that needs inspection, while @TeslaNY explicitly mentions the old condition of the tires, suggesting necessary updates for safe operation.
|
 |
Positive: @jjking22 expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's color, indicating a strong aesthetic appeal. @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) highlighted the Cayenne GTS as well-cared-for and emphasized its consistent service history as noted in the Carfax report. Recent maintenance, including a transfer case fluid change and new spark plugs, suggests the vehicle is in good shape.
Neutral: @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) mentioned the vehicle's good running condition and encouraged potential bidders to ask questions. The seller also appears open to communication, demonstrating a willingness to provide clarity regarding the vehicle's condition and service history.
Negative: @dinkman raised a question about the transfer case, showing some concern about whether it had been replaced. @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) acknowledged not having information on the transfer case replacement but reassured that it had been serviced recently, indicating an area of uncertainty for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @JimS99 (The Seller) mentions that the trailer tows beautifully behind his TRD Pro 4Runner and has been well taken care of. It has been stored in a garage and only used for about five or six nights, providing a comfortable sleeping area that is nearly Queen-sized. Other commenters appreciate the setup, even without the use of the shower, indicating that it is a nice-looking trailer overall. @WEM specifically compliments the setup, emphasizing its aesthetics without the shower feature.
Neutral: @JimS99 (The Seller) provides detailed information about the trailer’s specifications, including the dimensions of the mattress being 79"X55" and the dry weight of 2,200 lbs. He clarifies that the trailer has Timbren Suspension rather than Evolution Suspension and specifies the overall height as 79" without the awning and 88" with it. Several commenters, including @jermadjesty and @matt_gineo, seek more precise measurements and weight details, indicating a shared interest in the technical aspects of the trailer.
Negative: @JimS99 (The Seller) acknowledges a slight bend in the fender due to a branch, which may raise concerns for potential buyers about the condition of the trailer. @Fought questions whether the stated height includes the awning, highlighting potential confusion regarding features. There is also an implied concern from @jermadjesty regarding the accurate dimensions of what is advertised compared to what is actually available, which could suggest discrepancies in the listing.
|
 |
Positive: @Bremen79 praises the vehicle as an attractive model that draws attention, highlighting its well-built nature and potential for future value appreciation. @Charleetuner appreciates the timeless design of the R129, noting how well it ages and finding the head unit setup interesting. The seller @Collectibleclassics emphasizes their commitment to transparent transactions and high customer satisfaction, showcasing their 4.9/5 star rating.
Neutral: @Cornell89 inquires about a prior accident and expresses concerns over repainting and unclear service records regarding the vehicle's top cylinders. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, clarifies that the damages were cosmetic and the previous owner had the top mechanisms serviced thoroughly, ensuring functionality. @IceyDan310 shows interest in future auction offerings, indicating familiarity with the seller's stock.
Negative: @Cornell89 critiques the discrepancies in service records and the vehicle's cosmetic repairs, suggesting that the trunk lid and fenders may not match perfectly. @MooshiPirpy14 expresses concern over carpet discoloration, suggesting an aesthetic issue. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, acknowledges the wear and suggests it's typical for the interior color, noting their effort to remedy the discoloration.
|
 |
Positive: @OldGoat68 expressed strong admiration, calling the vehicle his all-time favorite Harley. @rofandofy noted its value, saying it may get the price it deserves due to its low production numbers and rarity. @Sir_Nick reminisced about riding one when they were new, describing it as a monster and fun on the track.
Neutral: Comments regarding the condition and originality of the bike's paint led to discussions among users. @Nrsro sought verification of the paint with a gauge and mentioned the importance of authenticity in value. @smincer (The Seller) mentioned that while he cannot confirm the paint with a gauge, he guarantees its originality based on long-standing familiarity with the bike.
Negative: @Longshot raised concerns about the seat's originality compared to previous models, questioning if the seat configuration matched factory specifications. @jakebrakemaster reiterated the need for verification of the original paint and tires, while @25ovem expressed skepticism about the factory mufflers, suggesting they might be performance mufflers instead. Such concerns depict a level of doubt among bidders about the authenticity and condition of various components.
|
 |
Positive: @seems_lgt praises the stunning color combination and acknowledges the seller's efforts, emphasizing the overall positive experience expected from the auction. @Migman appreciates the vintage appeal of the Porsche 930 Turbo, while @RedArcadia finds Meteor Gray Metallic to be especially attractive. @tman94 and @haveatrailer2 both express admiration for the car's aesthetic, with the latter noting how the color combination has influenced their search for a vehicle. Additionally, @ICC (The Seller) highlights the car's various features, service history, and thorough inspections, instilling confidence in potential buyers.
Neutral: @ICC (The Seller) provides extensive information about the car's specifications and history, including service records and inspection findings, engaging with interested bidders and addressing questions regarding ownership discrepancies and mechanical details. They clarify the car's status and provide documentation to support claims about its specifications, encouraging bidders to reach out with any further inquiries. While some inquiry commenters, like @jockW, request details about the engine's compression readings, there appears to be no significant contention or disagreement regarding the car's condition.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the car's modifications and overall condition, with @evobic questioning discrepancies in ownership history and the car's originality. They also point out potential repainting issues, asking for detailed images to clarify the condition of various components. @jimerl raises concerns over the car's AC system and upholstery matching, while @Mpollaci notes a potential issue with the turbo boost gauge not functioning in a video. These negative comments suggest some uncertainty about the car's restoration quality and originality, prompting the seller to reassure potential buyers through responses.
|
 |
Positive: @VantageAuto (The Seller) describes the truck as one of the cleanest low mileage Rams available, boasting a reliable 4.7-liter Magnum V8 engine that offers ample power without the worries that come with higher-performance variants. The body and interior quality are praised, and there are no odors or signs of smoke. The seller also emphasizes the proper functioning of all features, creating a sense of confidence in the vehicle's condition. Additionally, the seller is flexible regarding tire options for the prospective buyer's preference, ensuring they have a say in the final setup of the truck.
Neutral: Several potential buyers have sought additional details about various aspects of the truck, such as the bed length, tire specifications, and any possible accident damage. @Leiniesbuddy raised questions about the tire date codes, spare wheels compatibility, and the truck's history of odors, while @KMBCars and @Chip5828 inquired about specific features like the bed cover lock and potential paint issues. The seller has responded to these inquiries, indicating some uncertainty about certain details, such as the toggle switch operation and the exact nature of a wire inside the passenger door hinge.
Negative: There has been concern regarding the condition of the truck's paint, particularly with @Chip5828 mentioning potential peeling above the windshield. Further inquiries about damage from an accident also suggest apprehension about the vehicle's history despite the seller's assurance of no visible issues. @Leiniesbuddy's persistent questioning about past accidents and tire conditions reflects a level of skepticism about the seller's claims regarding the truck's quality and any hidden imperfections that may not be immediately apparent.
|
 |
Positive: @vtec4ever expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its heavy-duty construction and reliability, describing it as a bucket list car. @rexfox also praised the truck, noting that the long bed improves its ride and makes it more suitable for hauling. @83_hilux reassured potential buyers by stating the truck runs perfectly and emphasizes its vintage charm, indicating that it is well maintained with a detailed list of parts replaced and serviced over the years.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed shipping logistics. @MJB194 asked about shipping costs from Hawaii, while @jadkri004 wondered about logistics to ship the truck to California. @montentoyz provided information about shipping options, mentioning Matson's rates, and @Greatwhite97 shared their own quote from Hawaii to Florida. @KZN185Surf mentioned they have a Toyota needing a sibling and asked about the timeline for pickup, indicating interest but no commitment.
Negative: @Chamba raised concerns about collector cars being designated as gross polluters in California, reflecting apprehension over environmental issues. @notlikelytowin4 expressed reluctance about traveling to drive the vehicle home. While @kjensen239 shared a past regret about not purchasing a similar vehicle, suggesting it might have faced rust issues, this comment notes the fragility of such older trucks, signaling potential concerns regarding maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the vehicle, praising its stunning Ice Gray Metallic color and exceptional condition. @boaboyoz referred to it as a 'super cool edition,' while @Seena described it as 'gorgeous.' @mkxair remarked on the unique opportunity for the new owner to experience the car just shy of its engine run-in period, highlighting the thrilling potential of driving the car at high RPMs. Additionally, @GasolineAlleyGarage (The Seller) detailed various high-end features and modifications, encouraging engagement from the community.
Neutral: Some comments reflected on the vehicle's specifications and its auction process rather than expressing outright excitement or disdain. @lvh raised a question about the seller's status as a private individual, indicating the implications for taxes in certain states. @Mandinga humorously noted that the Carfax showed it as a commercial vehicle. Other commenters mentioned logistical details, such as @yellowstone1 requesting a cold start video and @Maxwell507 appreciating the fact that the vehicle was indeed registered in Montana and had experienced local roads, which adds to its appeal.
Negative: A couple of comments took on a more skeptical tone, particularly regarding the vehicle's history or the seller's approach. @Plumsauce questioned the logic of changing the exhaust and then not driving the vehicle much. @DieselM333 made a playful jab at the seller's name, associating it with potential fire hazards. Meanwhile, @Wolfenhaus noted his surprise that the car wasn't listed as a premium auction, suggesting he expected more given its quality. Overall, these comments hint at a degree of caution among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle's unique features and condition, highlighting its impressive history as a one-owner Solar Yellow 1994 MR2 Turbo. Users like @RumbleAuto expressed enthusiasm about the rarity of this model, noting the limited production numbers and the seller's care in maintaining the car. @MatteoLeuzzi emphasized the MR2's design qualities and placed it among his all-time favorite sports cars, while @MJELLC pointed out the vehicle's coveted engineering improvements and its stunning color, appreciating the transparency and honesty from the seller throughout the auction process.
Neutral: The discussion also included inquiries and clarifications about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @MJB194 asked the seller about potential odors post-repair and the undercoating applied after rust repairs, indicating concerns shared by many regarding the vehicle's upkeep. Sellers and enthusiasts alike contributed thoughts on the car's power steering and previous service, with @eshum noting details about the power steering feature. Several users, including @DatsunZGuy and @Bill_Meyer, offered helpful opinions on addressing the glovebox's damage, demonstrating a collaborative spirit within the community.
Negative: However, not all comments were entirely positive, as there were concerns about the vehicle's rust and leaks. @Bill_Meyer noted areas of rust mentioned in the auction, while @AstroFarmNut (The Seller) disclosed some ongoing oil leakage issues, expressing disappointment over not being able to fully resolve past concerns. Additionally, @EyePapi and others raised questions about the glovebox's condition and potential restoration costs, indicating that while the car is valued for its rarity, it does carry some concerns that potential buyers need to consider.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed fond memories and nostalgia for the LUV trucks, highlighting their fun driving experience. @Cloh noted that the truck was great and recalled previous ownership of a light blue model with specific features like a rear sliding window. @JayKay2430 shared a personal story about learning to drive on LUV trucks, emphasizing the joyful memories associated with them. Other users like @mike_rockwell praised the truck as an amazing survivor from an era when most LUVs had deteriorated. @Wayneliu also called the truck awesome, showing interest in its potential to pass smog checks in California, indicating confidence in its preservation.
Neutral: The seller, @ConroyClassics, provided prompt responses to inquiries, showing attentiveness in addressing requests for videos and photos. They committed to sharing driving and cold start videos, as well as additional underbody images after acknowledging potential concerns about rust—a common issue for vehicles of this age. Comments from users like @rexfox sought specific details about the condition of components like the headliner and sunroof, which @ConroyClassics addressed by confirming their satisfactory condition. The seller also noted the challenge of transportation costs to the East Coast, illustrating the complexities of classic vehicle sales.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns regarding logistics and the practicality of the truck. @shadylane pointed out transportation issues as a deal breaker for potential buyers located far from Oregon. The specific suitability of the truck for taller individuals was another topic of discussion, as @shadylane inquired about legroom due to his height. @Cloh humorously lamented the idea of needing to let go of their memories associated with the LUV, suggesting a sentimentality for past experiences over practicality. Additionally, concerns about the lack of a build sheet raised questions regarding the truck's complete history and specifications, which could deter some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle, highlighting its desirability and quality. @DHD505 mentioned that the vehicle has not hit the reserve price in its last auction. @Bryan1984 expressed affection for the truck, noting it performs well in snow, while @MagnetGuru mentioned it is a 'sweet ride' and is optimistic about it finding a new home this time around. @dodgemahal boldly stated that despite its age, the Jeep would last with minimal care. @Lacs added that any price near its last auction value would be fair, calling it far better than current market alternatives such as Jeep.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in conversation about the vehicle's auction history. @Leiniesbuddy questioned if the car was sold to the highest bidder after the last auction, leading to clarification from @genevamotorcars (The Seller) that a high bidder backed out due to taxes. @AlexmVagon, a newcomer, inquired about auction duration, to which @genevamotorcars provided details on the time left. @Dr110yd shared a personal story about wanting to acquire a similar vehicle for some time and expressed interest in the ongoing auction dynamics.
Negative: There were some criticisms and concerns raised about the auction process and the vehicle. @rco1967 commented on the shock of needing to pay taxes on the vehicle, displaying a bit of discontent. @FordFanaticBigTime raised a concern about a potential issue with the vehicle's stereo system based on a drive video, though @genevamotorcars quickly clarified there was no actual problem. These negative comments reflect worries about auction transparency and product condition, indicating some hesitancy among bidders.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters like @Craven and @SoP expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @Craven noting his love for the round-eye design and @SoP praising the appearance of the P-Slots and the overall aesthetic of the MkI GTI. @mick59 happily noted that it was great to see the GTI listed, emphasizing how incredible it looks. Several other commentors, such as @E86_nerd and @Beetle66, shared fond memories of their own vehicles and acknowledged the well-kept condition of this one. Additionally, @rstub, the owner since 2018, reminisced about the enjoyable ownership experience and the car's reliability, indicating that the GTI has been a joy to drive over the years.
Neutral: The seller, @lromanosky, actively addressed concerns raised by commenters, particularly regarding the branding of the title and clarifying mileage discrepancies as errors likely due to confusion between kilometers and miles as well as documentation issues. @lromanosky also provided insight into the car's condition, revealing recent updates like maintenance performed on the rocker panels and the handling of paint details. Some commenters sought clarity regarding the OEM wheels and additional parts that had been included in past auctions, with @lromanosky confirming that extra parts come with the car, including the original parts mentioned.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's history arose from @BigBadNumber3, questioning the transition from a "clean Massachusetts title" to a "Branded Title" and the implications regarding mileage issues. @gauldingr and @DH200 also raised queries about the missing OEM steel wheels that were part of the previous auction, hinting at a lack of clarity regarding the vehicle's complete history. Additionally, the mention of potential odometer tampering issues raised in the CarFax report left some commenters skeptical, although @rstub's account of his meticulous records attempts to counter those doubts. Overall, there seems to be a mixture of enthusiasm tempered with apprehension surrounding the car's background.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz expresses enthusiasm for the Bronco's striking blue and white color combination, referring to it as dynamite with a sweet build. @BeastRig and @davex18 agree, calling it a beast of a rig and a dream Bronco, respectively. @sconfer also loves the color and mentions it as a great-looking 79. @Larsff69 echoes this sentiment by wishing he was in the market for a Bronco and hopes the future owner enjoys it, while @rickinbc compliments the machine's beauty and inquires about the specific color of the blue and white paint. @CarNut8558 clarifies the paint code and reiterates how beautiful the truck is.
Neutral: Several commenters discuss the details regarding the lift of the Bronco, with @kcsteve speculating that it might have a 6-inch lift, which @gragg_scott (The Seller) confirms might actually be around 6.5 inches including tire height. @gmagno suggests that a cold start and driving video would increase interest from potential buyers, indicating a desire for more evidence of the vehicle's condition. @MontanaBroncos inquires about the rear seat material and suggests a factory look upgrade that could appeal to buyers. @ctamlin raises an important question about the odometer reading, which has a discrepancy that puzzles both them and @gragg_scott, who cannot confirm the mileage history.
Negative: Concerns are voiced regarding the odometer reading, as @ctamlin questions the discrepancy between the displayed and title mileage. @Bruno417 notes that since the Bronco is being sold as TMU (True Mileage Unknown), the mileage may not significantly impact the sale, indicating potential skepticism about the vehicle's history. Additionally, @robjwald and @mikesclassiccars pose questions about any rust repairs made during restoration and the structural integrity of various parts of the vehicle, which could be red flags for interested buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @IcemanBDub remarked on the vehicle's exemplary condition, calling it a 'survivor' and noting its revolutionary nature when released. @JLsKA510 expressed eagerness to bid on the car despite being far away, while @paulkstadden fondly recounted their own experience with an FX45, praising its power and enjoyable driving dynamics. @BMW330i added that they have a soft spot for Infiniti vehicles and described the SUV as a total sleeper, reflecting a positive sentiment towards the model's understated appeal.
Neutral: @Descanuck highlighted the car's pristine condition and made inquiries about maintenance history, while also mentioning a specific cosmetic patch on the dash that deviated from their own model. @Arinepon supported this inquiry by suggesting that the patch was likely a dash cover due to common issues with cracking in similar vehicles. @testdummypilot (The Seller) addressed these concerns, confirming the coverlay and explaining the undercoating, stating that the original owner took good care of the car's maintenance and preservation.
Negative: @paulkstadden shared their frustrations about electronics failing during their ownership, which was complicated by the scarcity of replacement parts, leading to an extended period without their vehicle. @JLsKA510 lamented that the original owners did not take advantage of a dash replacement recall, which could have mitigated some concerns about the car's interior. @Nismo_Native noted similar issues with dash materials in related models, casting a shadow on the reliability of older Infiniti SUVs.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a generally positive sentiment towards the vehicle, with several users praising its condition. @stugottz noted that despite having 490k miles, the truck is in pretty nice shape with lots of work done, indicating a level of maintenance and care. @Bkbaird simply described it as a nice truck, while @RWD-FTW highlighted the aesthetic appeal of the short bed, suggesting that even the truck's color looks good.
Neutral: There were a few requests for additional information and clarifications regarding the truck. @swrautomotive inquired about the vehicle's history and repaint age, while @Chipper55 requested specific pictures of the truck's underside and door frames, indicating a desire for thoroughness. @Bkbaird also sought confirmation on whether the truck is a short bed and has dual gas tanks, to which @NikDrix (The Seller) provided clear answers and additional details.
Negative: Some critics raised concerns about modifications and vehicle presentation. @NapCar pointed out that the 16-inch rims and 3/4 ton hubcaps might not be correct for the truck, suggesting potential alterations that could affect its authenticity. Additionally, @Square_66 expressed discomfort with the underside being sprayed, preferring to see its original state after 40+ years rather than a fresh coat, indicating skepticism regarding the vehicle's true condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the Subaru-powered 1985 Volkswagen Vanagon project, highlighting the merits of the EJ22 engine and its popularity among van enthusiasts. @ttv566 praised the van for its potential as a fun and reliable camper, mentioning several positive aspects like the new fuel tank, supportive motor swap, and the availability of parts in North America. There was also appreciation for the unique features such as the original 14-inch wheels and the value of factory floor mats.
Neutral: Several users sought clarification on the vehicle's registration status and functionality, indicating a mix of curiosity and concern. @MalamutAutoMuseum (The Seller) addressed questions about the clean California title and the planned non-operation (PNO) status, explaining the necessary steps for licensing in California. Other users, such as @jammyauto, commented on the technical aspects of the conversion, discussing the legality and qualifications for smog compliance, while also noting that the conversion may not be perfectly executed.
Negative: There were also some critical comments regarding the vehicle's condition, with users pointing out potential issues. @milage noted that Florida's climate had taken a toll on the bodywork, while @jammyauto expressed doubts about the quality of the conversion work, suggesting it may require significant upgrades for proper functionality. Additionally, @Vananahammock raised concerns regarding non-functional gauges, particularly the speedometer and tachometer, acknowledging some oversight in the vehicle's current state.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express nostalgia and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its unique charm and significance in automotive history. @Tom_S. calls it a beauty, while @robbiefarmer and @bondgraham praise it as a classic that changed the course of automotive design. @sweetcars, the seller, acknowledges the fun and memorable nature of the vehicle, stating it's well-deserved of the attention and views it receives. Comments like that from @Meow and @1sadboy reinforce the idea of it being a beloved and cherished choice for family road trips in the past.
Neutral: In several comments, individuals discuss practical considerations and personal experiences with the vehicle, providing a balanced view. @HeavyTank77 inquires about functionality details like cruise control and speaker operation, which @sweetcars confirms positively. @1click2many and @Costanza76 engage in a discussion about the vehicle's engine options and transmission reliability, sharing opinions and experiences that contribute to the overall understanding of the vehicle's dynamics. There's also a notable exchange about the maintenance and care needed for the transmission, particularly between @ThatVanGuy and @vw81jetta, indicating a knowledgeable community around these models.
Negative: Some comments highlight issues related to the vehicle, with @MdistelBMW noting a missing back ashtray and recalling similar issues. @1click2many mentions that later models had a better transmission option while @Costanza76 counters with a strong opinion about the reliability of the A413 3-speed transmission being more desirable than newer models. @HeavyTank77 reflects on headliner issues prevalent in Dodge/Chrysler/Plymouth cars, suggesting ongoing design flaws. Overall, while many appreciate the vehicle's nostalgic value, practical concerns and potential mechanical problems are also voiced.
|
 |
Positive: @DENWERKS expresses their admiration for the 66-67 Fairlane's body style, calling it one of their favorites and praising the solid condition of the car, particularly the untouched undercarriage, noting that such structural integrity is essential. @a410traveler comments on the vehicle's beautiful styling and the eye-catching red paint paired with Cragar SS wheels, highlighting its appealing aesthetics. @Ranchero65 brings valuable historical insights into the build date of the car, correcting it to 1966, which illustrates the collaborative spirit of the community in sharing knowledge about classic vehicles.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @20BlackSeries and @WEK53 have raised questions about specific details regarding the vehicle, such as the cut out floorboard and engine specifications, indicating a desire for more information. @Bri1967 and @mark01 commend the seller for leaving the undercarriage untouched, prompting the new owner to decide how to clean it, while urging the installation of proper bleeder screws for safety. @TurboChris suggests that the seller could be more engaged in answering questions during the auction, highlighting the need for better communication in this aspect.
Negative: Concerns about safety have been voiced by @Bri1967 and @mark01, both of whom criticized the bent brake lines on the front calipers, calling for the seller to install proper bleeder screws to ensure the car is safe to drive. @WEK53 expresses disappointment about the lack of responses regarding the engine details and crimped brake lines, indicating some frustration among potential buyers. Additionally, @crowt mentions that the car lacks the correct air cleaner, which could detract from its value and desirability, signaling a common theme of worry over missing or incorrect parts.
|
16k-Mile 2003 Chevrolet Tracker ZR2 Convertible 4×4 5-Speed
2CNBJ78C036910185
Lot 226325
Private Party
 |
Positive: @rthans describes the vehicle as a 'time capsule,' expressing excitement about its nostalgic value and reminiscing about the cooler features of Trackers compared to Metros. @scmichael79 agrees, noting that the Tracker is very clean and wishes for 80s splash graphics, indicating interest in potential future value. @Vtec4ever sees it as an ideal car for young people, highlighting its reliability and fun nature. @Claudio-claudio praises the care taken by the previous owner, viewing it as a beautiful vehicle despite considering its impracticalities for buyers in Canada. @Thesunisrising appreciates the seller's presentation skills, suggesting a commendation for the sale process.
Neutral: @JCW-SF (The Seller) mentions that the vehicle was owned and well-maintained by their father, providing details about its limited usage and upkeep. @bdehart1967 queries about a minor blemish reported on Carfax, which the seller confirms, showing transparency in the sale. @ggross engages with the seller about specific features of the soft top and requests additional pictures, demonstrating buyer intent and diligence in evaluating the vehicle's condition. Various commenters express hope regarding the vehicle's future and placement, while @Small_525 reflects on the past pricing and personal experiences with similar models.
Negative: @blujkts takes a critical stance, arguing that the vehicle's safety rating is below modern standards, questioning its suitability for young drivers given its performance features. They suggest that spending over $20k might not be wise for a young person. @Nickyboi humorously labels the 5-speed manual as the 'Millennial Theft Device,' possibly indicating cynicism about its practicality in today's market. Overall, there is a recognition that while the Tracker holds sentimental value, it may not align with contemporary safety expectations.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reveal a strong appreciation for the 2013 Audi TTS Quattro, highlighting its beauty, low mileage, and performance capabilities. @HELIDR admires the car's aesthetic, while @240gordy shares positive experiences with their TTRS model, emphasizing its fast handling and comfort. Many commenters, including @Davisflyer and @CC52, express excitement about the vehicle's qualities and predict a favorable outcome for the auction, suggesting it will make a great ride for the new owner.
Neutral: Several comments address questions about the vehicle's specifications and features. @SteveSylvester raises an inquiry about the practicality of the rear seats, to which @aegmotorsports (The Seller) responds directly, clarifying that they fold flat. @HappiestDays seeks comparative insights on the driving experience between the generations of the TT, while @Jranj56 asks for specific details regarding tire conditions, demonstrating a mix of curiosity and practical inquiries about the TTS without undermining its appeal.
Negative: A few comments hint at concerns or inquiries related to the car's maintenance and technical aspects. @Red99 questions whether the Magnetic Ride suspension has been appropriately maintained, which could impact future repairs. @240gordy also expresses uncertainty about the specifications provided, showcasing a critical view on the accuracy of information. Meanwhile, @mlowengrub's comments imply skepticism regarding the auction duration and the remaining interest, suggesting some doubts among potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle's beautiful restoration and design, with @boaboyoz describing it as a wicked Washington C10 rocking in red. @ACA101 remarked that it is the nicest 1967 C10 shorty seen in a long time, and @C10HQ expressed a desire for video content to showcase the truck. @Ztruckman36 noted exceptional build quality, and several commenters, including @fyrefast and @stugottz, offered condolences for the loss of the previous owner, commending the craftsmanship and attention to detail of the vehicle. The positive sentiments highlight the truck's quality and the emotional connection surrounding its sale.
Neutral: Several commenters pointed out that the vehicle was listed incorrectly as a 1966, with @Dgroff and @silver63 noting it is likely a 1967 model. @huntinjeep confirmed this with comments about the different body styles of the two years. @MSS1200 raised questions about the vehicle's specifications, specifically regarding the 8 valve body carb setup and brake system, while @discobob appreciated the fuel injection system installed in the truck. @Rander05, representing the seller, provided clarifications about the truck's features and its history, though some details about the restoration timeline appeared inconsistent, prompting further inquiries from interested commenters.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding potential discrepancies in the truck's description and its components, particularly around the brakes, with @MSS1200 doubting the presence of four-wheel disc brakes as claimed. @Red99 expressed uncertainty about the fuel gauge and also noted possible issues with the hood molding based on the pictures. The confusion surrounding the restoration timeline, particularly whether the vehicle was completed nine years ago or recently, troubled some commenters, leading @Red99 to express a desire for clarity and more detailed documentation regarding the restoration process. Overall, while the vehicle's aesthetic qualities were well-received, doubts regarding certain details created a less than satisfactory impression for some.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, with @brighton_corgi describing it as 'quite the looker' and @mifydnu noting his enjoyment of past models and expressing regret over selling his carbon black DB9. @rcwoodjr highlighted the car's stunning design and powerful DBS powertrain, stating it provides a 'symphony of power and refinement.' Others echoed this sentiment, with @turblowed calling it 'achingly gorgeous' and @speedraser noting that the Cobalt Blue color is particularly attractive and exotic, setting it apart from more common hues. Overall, the vehicle received enthusiastic accolades regarding its aesthetic appeal and performance.
Neutral: Throughout the discussion, there were several inquiries about the vehicle's condition and history. @chuck3304 mentioned the lack of detailed maintenance records beyond a brake flush and a pre-purchase inspection, raising questions about the car's service history. @jorodriguez90 asked about the status of the clutch and whether the car had paint protection film (PPF), while @honeybadger sought clarification on a pink mark on the passenger door sill from the auction photos. These questions reflect a desire for additional information to understand the vehicle's overall condition better.
Negative: Conversely, some comments expressed concerns about potential transparency issues. @kwrush cited recent one-star reviews on Google that noted undisclosed damage on other vehicles delivered by Collectible Classics, prompting concerns over hidden issues with this vehicle as well. @snapski pointed out evidence of wear on the driver's seat and requested details about the extent of damage. This skepticism around the dealership's integrity was met with reassurance from the seller, who responded to questions and emphasized their commitment to transparency in vehicle listings.
|
2,900-Mile Original-Owner 2009 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500KR
1ZVHT88S195138481
Lot 226329
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Ptrem described the vehicle as "Nice!" and @Longmire45 referred to it as "A GEM" while expressing nostalgia for the same model car, highlighting its color combination as an all-time favorite and emphasizing the meticulous care the owner has taken with this low mileage example. @DENWERKS reiterated admiration for the color combination and conveyed a desire to own this beautiful Shelby one day. Additionally, @RS442, who owns the same model, noted that these cars are fun and provide good value, reinforcing the positive sentiment surrounding the vehicle's performance and enjoyment. @drdcon (The Seller) shared insights about the car's impressive sound and precise shifter, further emphasizing its high-performance nature.
Neutral: @drdcon (The Seller) provided an introduction and background on the car for potential bidders, explaining that it was rarely driven yet well-maintained, complete with original documentation, and clean title. The seller addressed viewer concerns about drivetrain rust, indicating that such surface rust is common for S197 Mustangs and discussing the car's overall condition. @linderpat confirmed the presence of rust is typical for these vehicles, while @pwd72s indicated a similar experience with the rear axle rust in his own Mustang, suggesting it should not affect functionality. @Lilred79m306 inquired about the extent of scratches and potential paint repairs, showing that potential buyers are seeking clarity but keeping the dialogue respectful.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding surface rust on the drivetrain. @Tucsonmike questioned if this rust was normal, to which @drdcon (The Seller) and @linderpat confirmed its typical appearance in these models. However, @pwd72s criticized Ford for the rust, suggesting it reflects poor manufacturing quality. Additionally, @Lilred79m306 pointed out dings and scratches visible in the listing's photos, requesting details about their origin and any paint repairs that may have been conducted, indicating a wariness among potential buyers about the vehicle's cosmetic status.
|
 |
Positive: @Landlords1 (The Seller) mentions that Super Stocks are highly collectible, as only 1429 units were produced from 2020 to 2023, and they rank just behind the Demons in terms of performance and value. @ddivinia expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle with a simple comment about it being a cool ride, wishing the seller good luck with it. The condition of the car is highlighted, as @Landlords1 (The Seller) assures that it has never been raced and is in showroom condition.
Neutral: @LorenPaul raises a question about how one can identify a Super Stock by just looking at it, asking if there are any emblems present. @RyanH505 provides helpful information in response, noting that while there are no emblems, the distinguishing features include the Redeye style snorkel hoods and specific wheel colors. @doorite1 inquires about the potential racing history of the car, suggesting that the mileage could indicate it has been raced a significant number of times, to which @Landlords1 (The Seller) refutes by stating the car has never been raced.
Negative: There are no significant negative comments directly related to the vehicle's performance or condition. However, concerns about the potential racing history, as raised by @doorite1, could imply skepticism about the car's usage despite @Landlords1 (The Seller)'s assurances that it remains in pristine condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Mr._H expressed admiration for the color combination of the vehicle, stating a desire for colored wheels to remain in style. @Old_Ned complimented the seller on their work, expecting the truck to attract attention. @rackops, usually picky about Model As, appreciated this particular truck for its overall quality and restoration, indicating eagerness to bid on it. Other commentors, including @svatem and @DENWERKS, shared positive remarks about the truck's design, restoration quality, and nostalgic value.
Neutral: @Henrietta noted specifics about the truck's fenders and running boards, questioning their authenticity while acknowledging the truck's nice appearance. @LIVLISA (The Seller) clarified details regarding the fender design and the reproduction nature of the body and bed, providing receipts to substantiate the restoration. Others, such as @brokenvette, provided factual comments about certain features of the truck like cowl lights and pin striping, while mentioning that the truck still holds aesthetic value.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding aspects of the truck's authenticity, with @Henrietta questioning the replica body, and @HFD1 inquiring about the materials of the fenders. @SteveMack_CT suggested safety improvements for the gas line and fuse kit installation, which, while constructive, indicated areas needing attention. Overall, while there were hints of skepticism regarding certain components, there was a consensus on the truck's charm and aesthetic appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @Nismo_Native expressed enthusiasm for the car, sharing that they own the same model and find it extremely enjoyable to drive, highlighting the beauty of the Spa Yellow color on the S2K. @pussle_gut appreciated the personalized license plate, suggesting it fits the car's character well. @tinahoran (The Seller) confirmed that they possess the boot to cover the retracted top, further engaging with potential buyers and showcasing transparency by mentioning additional images in the gallery.
Neutral: Comments such as those from @Batfan2 and @cahn10 reflect a desire for more information about the car's condition and functionality. @Batfan2 questioned whether the seller has the boot to cover the retracted top and requested additional details about other components, indicating a level of interest and critical evaluation. @cahn10 asked for a video of the car running, showing the community's desire for more evidence of the vehicle's performance before purchasing.
Negative: @napacia raised concerns about the K&N intake shield not being aligned properly, implying it may not be functioning optimally and also questioned the absence of a carb sticker that should accompany the intake. @5.0THIS inquired about any prior paintwork on the car, which could signal potential worries about its history or condition. Additionally, @Prescription-7 described the heat shield's mounting issue while acknowledging the detail-oriented nature of @napacia's concerns, which indicates a level of scrutiny regarding the vehicle's maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, highlighting its appealing aesthetics and meticulous updates. @boaboyoz noted that it is a 'superb specimen,' while @MrOffshore expressed admiration, saying, 'This is an absolutely beautiful Scout!' @tlcamg remarked on the well-executed add-ons and predicted high demand for the vehicle. @LoxRiver appreciated the color and attention to detail, declaring it a 'home run' and wishing the seller luck with the sale. @Reey75, the seller, consistently responded positively to these comments, acknowledging the compliments with gratitude.
Neutral: The seller, @Reey75, engaged with various inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifications and conditions. One potential buyer, @That_bex, asked for height and width measurements, which @Reey75 promptly provided. @mkor expressed interest in viewing the truck in person and sought direction to the seller's location, indicating a willingness to meet shortly. Throughout the thread, @Reey75 maintained open communication, facilitating the buyer's questions without any negative tone.
Negative: There were minor concerns regarding the vehicle, such as @Reey75 addressing a squeaky noise attributed to a loose spare tire, which was subsequently fixed. Though there were no strong negative comments, @mkor displayed uncertainty about logistics and usage of the platform, hinting at a potential barrier for less experienced buyers. Additionally, no significant criticisms were levied against the truck, reflecting a generally positive sentiment among the commenters.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as a "Beautiful 420SEL in a very desirable, classic color combination" and appreciates the "gorgeous interior." Similarly, @JaDawgPNW calls it a "Beauty! Classic and timeless!" and wishes the seller luck with the sale. @Small_525 admires the car's exterior by stating, "Wow black is beautiful…when it's clean," expressing a dual appreciation for its looks and a realistic acknowledgment of maintenance needs. Overall, the design and aesthetic of the vehicle have received high praise from multiple commenters.
Neutral: @Turf1 regards the car as a beautiful classic but requests more information about its history, noting the lack of detailed service and maintenance records beyond the CarFax report. @EricAtlanta joins in the inquiry, suspecting the car may have recently been auctioned, and is curious to know if any service records were included. Furthermore, @Royall66 seeks clarification on the vehicle's service and storage history, implying that potential buyers would benefit from having more background information to make an informed decision.
Negative: Commenters have raised concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance history. @Turf1 points out that the only available mileage entries span a lengthy 16-year period with minimal usage, leading to questions about the car's storage condition during that time. @Knutspeed2024's request for a "cold startup and drive video" indicates skepticism about the vehicle's current operating state. The overall atmosphere among these comments suggests that while the car garners admiration, its somewhat mysterious maintenance history casts a shadow that could concern potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the Tacoma, highlighting its impressive condition and appeal as a classic vehicle. @Tom29 described it as a "very clean Tacoma" with "amazing specs," praising its immaculate overall condition despite its age. @Sarki shared a nostalgic sentiment, expressing how this basic truck brings happiness and reminiscing about its ubiquitous presence in American driveways. Additionally, several users like @phusky189 and @LongDucDong showed excitement and emotional attachment to the Tacoma, recognizing its nostalgic value and good design, with one user wishing they could afford such a prized vehicle.
Neutral: Discussion about the specifications and condition of the Tacoma was prevalent, with various prompted inquiries like @phusky189's question about existing rust. The seller, @stainlessillusion, provided insights into the truck’s maintenance history, detailing its previous owner's dedication as a Toyota Master Tech. While some users like @rocki327 and @phusky189 commented on pricing expectations in relation to MSRP, they also mentioned technical aspects of the vehicle, like its simplicity and capability for high mileage, indicating a balanced view rather than outright positivity or negativity.
Negative: Some users raised concerns regarding the listing quality and how it was possibly handled poorly by the platform, with @davidb72 suggesting that the write-ups lack authenticity and depth. @phusky189 also brought up worries about rust, reflecting a concern that potential buyers might share. Although the seller reassured users that the rust was merely surface-level oxidation, the initial question introduced a note of skepticism about the vehicle's condition. These mixed sentiments showcase how thorough inquiries about the vehicle sparked a bit of hesitance among some commenters.
|
 |
Positive: Commentators express appreciation for the uniqueness and charm of the vehicle. @LongDucDong mentioned that the car has received undeserved hatred, while @onlyhonda4me reassured potential bidders about the stigma associated with driving a PT Cruiser, emphasizing that the dorky stereotype disappears with this rare stick-shift version. @CollectorClassics (The Seller) described the car as a 'true gentleman’s car' and showcased confidence in its performance after driving it for at least 200 miles without any issues.
Neutral: Several questions were raised regarding the vehicle's history and maintenance records, particularly by @CarGuy70, who inquired about any past steering, suspension, or electrical issues. @Theermans questioned the choice of timing belt replacements and the previous use of recommended kits. @Bowtienut asked for clarification on the motor mounts' condition, demonstrating a keen interest in understanding the car's maintenance history more thoroughly. @CollectorClassics (The Seller) responded promptly to these inquiries, offering details about the recent work done on the car.
Negative: Some comments indicate a mixed sentiment about the car's perception and past concerns. @Wagons4Ever bluntly shared a negative personal experience with the model, admitting to hating the car even though it possessed some fun driving characteristics. @Theermans also expressed concern about the previous maintenance decisions regarding the timing belt, while @CarGuy70's inquiries reflected uncertainties about potential issues that might affect long journeys, hinting at underlying hesitations that buyers may feel.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning Admiral Blue color and overall aesthetic appeal. @AlPalmer10 stated it provides "200k worth of smiles," while @pepfoot praised its gorgeous specifications. Collectors noted its rarity, with @Willie_Makit mentioning it as one of only 51 C7 ZR1s in that color and only a few manufactured with particular options. @RumbleAuto and @Ninetres echoed the sentiment, calling the color incredible and appealing to potential buyers. Overall, there is a strong consensus that this model stands out in its category for its beautiful design and exclusivity.
Neutral: The vehicle's specifications were thoroughly discussed, including its low mileage of 3,030 and its impressive list of options. @jfkauto, the seller, provided detailed information about the car's history, including its build sheet, original window sticker, and service documentation. There were inquiries regarding specific features such as whether the vehicle was equipped with paint protection film and about its service history, including brake fluid and transmission checks. The rarity of the given configuration was emphasized as a selling point, making it a unique offering in the market.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about potential misfires and safety issues related to the exhaust, as highlighted in a service bulletin mentioning flames from the exhaust due to misfire conditions. @dawgeq87 prompted questions regarding maintenance practices due to the car's age and low mileage, emphasizing the need for routine service despite its limited use. Additionally, there were comments noting the high price point and auction dynamics, with bids starting to cool, suggesting a competitive and possibly stressful market environment for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @southtampaautoboutique (The Seller) mentions that the S600 drives great, shifts perfectly, and has ice-cold air conditioning, with all heating elements operational. The seller also highlights that there is quite a bit of service history available on Carfax, indicating that well-maintained records are associated with the vehicle. @Hargo believes that the S600 could be a good daily driver, suggesting it offers a level of quality that use as basic transportation could be hard to match at local used car lots.
Neutral: @Jaxxt17 raises multiple questions about maintenance issues, such as the condition of the ABC system and any possible reasons for the check engine light activation, showing an interest in the vehicle's service history. Several others also inquire about specific maintenance needs, including rear shocks and window functionalities, which reflects a focus on the current state of the vehicle rather than its performance. @southtampaautoboutique (The Seller) is responsive to inquiries, offering to provide video demonstrations and confirming the functionality of various features, indicating a willingness to keep potential buyers informed.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's current condition are evident among several commenters. @Jaxxt17 points out issues such as a ripped passenger seat, non-functioning window, and a bent rim, while also questioning the reliability of its rear seats. Additionally, @Drewr1972 asks about ominous signs like leaks and whether the shocks truly need replacement, implying a potentially serious mechanical problem. @red_sled criticizes the vehicle's badging, and @JimClem raises concerns about the state of the rear tires, indicating they might be a cause for worry.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting it as a beautiful car, especially appreciating its black on black color scheme. @danbarlow finds it beautiful and requests a video of it driving, while @PitcairnofPerthshire offers good luck for the auction and acknowledges the car's allure. @NormalNorm and @HotrodtoHell affirm that it’s a beauty, and @GTOscott1967 shares a heartfelt comment about its sentimental value connected to the seller's father, showcasing the car's history and connection to family skies. Moreover, @SALEMMG praises the car's restoration and the love that went into it, further cementing the appreciation felt by many.
Neutral: The seller, @DougHerbert58, addresses various inquiries by offering details about the vehicle's specification, including the carburetor and trim tags. He also discusses the importance of PHS documentation in validating the car's history. Some commenters, like @BaronVonZeppelin and @RDKing2010, emphasize the routine nature of authenticity inquiries in classic car sales while offering insight into the importance of proper documentation. While some participants, like @Adude, provide constructive feedback in relation to the seller's integrity, they also encourage understanding of the car's background, reiterating its appeal despite potential discrepancies.
Negative: However, not all interactions are positive; some comments reflect skepticism and criticism, particularly regarding the authenticity of the trim tag and the vehicle’s historical accuracy. @DANTIP and @GooseGas83 remind about the possible implications of altered trim tags, expressing concerns that could affect bidders' perceptions. @DougHerbert58 responded defensively to some criticisms, addressing the history of the car and his father’s legacy, which was met with mixed reactions. Overall, there are expressions of doubt particularly regarding the PHS documents and what they indicate about the car's history, with several users suggesting these documents could clear up concerns but cautioning that the trim tag's legitimacy is uncertain.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praise the vehicle's aesthetic features, particularly its striking Sting Gray Clear Coat paired with black leather and suede interiors, as noted by @Dollycat3, who described it as absolutely gorgeous. The overall condition and care of the vehicle are also highlighted, with @rgillhere (The Seller) mentioning that it is 100% stock with no paintwork done and that the original owner had taken great care of it. The seller assures potential buyers that the vehicle has spent most of its life down south, hinting at its good condition due to a favorable climate.
Neutral: There were some inquiries regarding the specifics of the vehicle, such as the condition of tires and brakes, which @Maxwells144 asked about. @rgillhere (The Seller) responded that the tires were replaced at about 15,000 miles, while the original brakes were still in good condition as per a recent inspection. Additionally, some commenters discussed the vehicle's features, noting the power is sent to the rear wheels, prompting a correction from @bringatrailer in the comments.
Negative: A few concerns were raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding aesthetic details. @MPMotorsports821 questioned whether there was a chip in the windshield based on an image, to which @rgillhere (The Seller) clarified that it was merely a slight discoloration in the tint, not a crack. Another comment by @bg4ltpc pointed out a discrepancy between the brake and gas pedal designs, though there was no response from the seller regarding this issue.
|
 |
Positive: @JohnnyBgoode85 (The Seller) describes his Fj40 with pride, highlighting its nearly two-decade ownership and garage care. Commenters like @HI4Lowcountry and @mfontaine2008 praise the vehicle's striking blue color and unique appearance, noting its beauty and desirable features. @Barry_O appreciates the fun factor and attention-grabbing qualities of the restomod, suggesting it is an appealing and unique package.
Neutral: Comments reflect curiosity regarding the vehicle's features and modifications. @GLCTraveler asks practical questions about driving videos and technical aspects like the relocated battery and engine temperature. @rustyray acknowledges the creative inclusion of a faux NOS bottle and queries the purpose of the substantial hood scoop, demonstrating an interest in both aesthetic choices and performance considerations. @JohnnyBgoode85 (The Seller) responds to these inquiries, providing explanations about the vehicle's design intent and technical details.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about certain modifications, particularly the substantial hood scoop and engine changes. @Baystate2020 questions why the original engine wasn't retained, suggesting a missed opportunity for authenticity. Additionally, @pullnit inquires about the necessity of the hood's design due to potential clearance issues, while @90sForme seeks clarification about the absence of the original factory hood in the auction, indicating uncertainty about the vehicle's completeness. Overall, while the vehicle garners interest, there are reservations about its modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @young308 finds the vehicle to be super clean, joking that it shows far less wear than its odometer suggests. @Dollycat3 considers the E350 exceptional, remarking that despite its mileage, it has been very well cared for. The seller @aegmotorsports corroborates this, noting that anyone would be surprised to learn it has 195k miles due to its impeccable condition, having been a one-owner, garage-kept vehicle. The seller has thoroughly serviced the car with various maintenance tasks, stating it is ready for many more miles of reliable driving.
Neutral: Commenters such as @HLECK23 inquire about specific features like air suspension and the quality of the head unit. @rustybills admires the condition of the front grill and bumper, while @AbuElMousa eagerly anticipates a driving video from the seller, reflecting a general interest in the car's performance. Questions about the condition of the car are raised by @cj11 and @drthokie, hinting at their genuine curiosity about the vehicle's true state.
Negative: Some skepticism arises from commenters like @cj11, who humorously questions whether the odometer might have been tampered with. @drthokie raises a point about only receiving one key fob, which may imply a concern about completeness. Additional technical inquiries about vehicle modifications and concerns regarding past mechanical issues are mentioned, particularly from @Tactbacon and @TexasMule, who seek clarifications on the car's systems and engine balance shaft issues, which some may perceive as a drawback.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's design, particularly highlighting its aesthetics. @SgtBeavis describes the Roma Spider as 'so sexy', indicating a strong visual appeal. @Kishote regards it as a great car that is accessible and allows for necessary options without excessive costs. @porkpiehat shares a nostalgic sentiment about its visual cues, while @Wob (The Seller) emphasizes the unique and tasteful color combination of 'BRG over Cognac', setting it apart from more common color choices.
Neutral: Comments regarding the auction process and specifications convey a neutral tone. @KilroyNo1 mentions keeping an eye on the Roma Spider's pricing, indicating ongoing interest in this model. @mike_747 provides insights about the warranty and maintenance package included with the vehicle, describing Ferrari's warranty policies. @cpicorp1 inquires specifically about the included items and keys, reflecting curiosity about the car's specifications, while @Wob (The Seller) answers questions and shares detailed information about the auction process and vehicle details.
Negative: Some comments express concern regarding aspects of the vehicle or the auction. @GruppeC956 criticizes the steering wheel controls, stating they have an 'expiration date that’s already in the past'. @onehussler comments on the high pricing of options available in the vehicle, in comparison to Porsche's pricing, which they found ridiculous. @Kishote and @mike_747 share experiences related to warranty limitations on Ferraris, underscoring potential issues buyers may face if they neglect to read the fine print.
|
 |
Positive: @lippy praised the car's clean undercarriage and expressed admiration for its value at $186k in 2009, stating it's a great car. @mks0129 and @Chi_PT remarked that if it were a six-speed manual, its value would soar, while others, like @blackonblack911, celebrated its pristine condition. @ElVerde found the car's unique specifications intriguing, suggesting that someone would appreciate its quirky features. @buybid22 (The Seller) emphasized that the car's distinct color has a pearl effect, which pairs beautifully with the linen interior. @Atxcruiser referred to it as a beautiful time capsule, wishing the seller luck with the sale amid naysayers.
Neutral: Multiple users discussed the car's rarity and uniqueness, considering it a fascinating example of craftsmanship. Comments from @TKAD and @pwbdlm highlighted the car's backstory and how it stands out from other models. While some found the Tiptronic transmission less desirable compared to the PDK, others expressed satisfaction with it, noting how it doesn’t detract from the car's overall allure. Discussions about auction history and market trends suggest that it remains a subject of interest among collectors and enthusiasts who appreciate its pedigree.
Negative: On the flip side, there were reservations about the car's condition due to its long inactivity. @1stlinnea and @mxtr55 expressed concerns about maintenance, questioning whether the fluids had been changed regularly and if the car ran like new. Comments like those from @nowr2go noted potential issues such as rodent infestations in service records, which raised doubts about the car's history. Others mentioned that while the car is stunning, it might not be practical as a daily driver, suggesting it could be more of a museum piece than a functioning automobile. Overall, the balance of opinions showcases both admiration and skepticism about this unique vehicle.
|
V8-60-Powered Midget Racer Project for New England Air Museum
Non-Running Project
Lot 226350
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many comments reflect a strong sense of enthusiasm for the vehicle, with @2012MKZ noting it as a "very cool project and extremely interesting." @sackboy expresses appreciation with a straightforward, "Beautiful Midget !! Crank it UP !!" and @Turbowned highlights familiarity with the car, having seen it a few times at the NEAM, calling it cool and wishing good luck with the auction. Additionally, @RoadRacer1 shares an extensive analysis of the car's components, showing genuine admiration for its restoration and history, asserting it as an excellent example of a 50s era midget.
Neutral: Several commenters provided technical insights and historical context about the vehicle, indicating a diversity of perspectives. @Ranchero65 corrects some historical context regarding Parnelli Jones and Bobby Marshman, contributing valuable racing history. The seller, @NEAM, actively engages with potential bidders, expressing willingness to answer questions and accommodating requests for more information or pictures. The ongoing communication showcases an effort to clarify details about the car, including its condition and specifications.
Negative: Conversely, there are critical opinions regarding the authenticity of the vehicle's classification. @bwstevens argues that the car should not be labeled as a Kurtis midget, suggesting that it may be a home-built variant instead. This perspective is at odds with the seller's description, which has led to a discussion about the car’s construction differences when compared to original Kurtis models. The critical tone suggests a concern about misrepresentation that could affect potential buyer interest and trust in the auction process.
|
 |
Positive: Many bidders and commentators expressed excitement over the Porsche GT4's attributes, noting its impressive features such as the 4.0-liter engine, manual transmission, and gorgeous color. @MichaelB, the seller, highlighted the car's low mileage and proactive maintenance, suggesting it as a fantastic opportunity for prospective buyers. Commenters like @christa_k and @LongDucDong praised the vehicle’s overall aesthetics and specifications, while @Jay-Z noted the excellent condition of the car, attesting to its history of meticulous care. Overall, there is a strong enthusiasm for this vehicle as a collector's item and desirable sports car.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on the vehicle's history and features, with bidders asking technical questions about components like the tires, brakes, and exhaust system. @Whataboutrob inquired about the original exhaust and the vehicle's use for track events, while @chenbr asked about any exposure to snow, showcasing a general desire for transparency in the vehicle's past. Questions about service records were also raised, with @parealtor asking about recall information that @MichaelB answered positively, indicating no open recalls were present on the Carfax report. The dialogue reflects a thorough interest in ensuring the car's integrity and performance.
Negative: There were concerns from potential bidders regarding specific modifications and features, with @Z28redline questioning the absence of the Sport Chrono package and what it might mean for the car's performance. Another user, @Versangetryx, playfully questioned the DME readout, indicating a degree of skepticism about the car's readiness for ownership. While the majority of comments are positive, some users expressed doubt over potential hidden issues, such as possible flaws or damages not evident in the photos. Overall, while the enthusiasm for the GT4 is high, there remains a cautious undertone concerning its condition and modifications.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express appreciation for the 1999 Land Rover Defender 90 Pickup Td5 5-Speed, highlighting its solid build quality and excellent condition. @BMcD noted that the truck is being offered by a reputable dealer, further emphasizing the quality of the sale. Additionally, @WAGONBOYTD acknowledged that the compression test results were positive and reported within the acceptable range, which adds to the vehicle's appeal. @OreandHusk shared a past ownership experience detailing its great shape, asserting it was one of the best trucks they had bought in Italy, indicating a high standard for this model.
Neutral: Several comments indicate curiosity about specific details, such as the 12 hole steel wheels mentioned by @Wildboar and @FoxyThe4Runner, showing engagement with the listing that suggests potential buyers are researching. @mahibaz raised questions about the mechanical precautions taken after noting low compression in previous invoices, while @1600veloce responded to inquiries providing transparency about the service history and recent upgrades, maintaining an informative dialogue with prospective buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition and mechanical integrity, with @FixItAgainTony and @jacktrades771 expressing apprehension about the low compression noted in earlier diagnostics. @mahibaz questioned why recommended repairs were not completed before putting the truck back up for sale, highlighting potential red flags regarding maintenance. Additionally, comments from @2hecknback indicated possible confusion regarding wheel types and designs, suggesting that the listing might not provide clear information for all interested parties.
|
 |
Positive: @FirehouseVintage describes the Chestnut Red Metallic over Parchment E21 as an "absolute sweetheart of a car," highlighting its well-preserved condition despite its 80k miles. Commentors like @Lengrep and @bobofohio echo this sentiment, noting that the car appears beautiful and well-loved, remarking on the charm of its classic lines and the rarity of the Chestnut color. @JGraham appreciates the low mileage and its patina, while others, like @Greasyfingers and @BCMac, emphasize the car's unique features and condition, suggesting it's a rarity among BMW models that can be driven and enjoyed.
Neutral: Several comments provide insights into the car's components and history without strong opinions. @Mmaier01 and @sjrasco inquire about the car's repaint history and confirm its transmission type, indicating they are considering serious queries regarding the car's condition. @E28E34 notes details about the dealership's emblem, adding historical context, while @ncipps and @amgsazan ask specific questions regarding the vehicle's condition and potential issues related to use. These inquiries imply that interested parties are seeking clarification about the car's functionality and history.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the vehicle's condition and potential issues, as noted by @Markster, who pointed out a missing nut on the muffler, and @AntMD, who raised doubts about the speedometer readings during the driving video, suggesting possible discrepancies. @Mmaier01 questioned the original paint color, indicating some uncertainty about the vehicle's authenticity, and @ncipps mentioned a possible splitting at the front jack points, hinting at structural worries. These comments reflect caution among potential buyers regarding the car's overall integrity.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the unique features and overall presentation of the vehicle. @KevalB praises the fantastic color, while @Beto44 notes the appealing vintage orange and black combination, describing the exhaust sound as amazing. Both @Kustomkat1950 and @classicalfas express admiration for the car's beauty, with @Kustomkat reminiscing about their personal connection to Porsches. @RonnyB believes the next owner will love the car, reaffirming the positive sentiment among the community regarding the 912E's aesthetics and enhancements.
Neutral: The seller, @1600veloce, provides detailed information about the vehicle's history and current condition, including maintenance and upgrades made by the owner, @fastricky. They clarify aspects such as the cooling system, heating functions, and engine specifications, making recommendations on how to best view the listing. Various commenters engage in technical discussions regarding the car's modifications and performance metrics, with @vwchad questioning the lack of documented receipts for engine upgrades and @Type911 discussing performance comparisons with stock models.
Negative: On the downside, some respondents have questioned the authenticity and future interest in its modifications. @Bentley964 and @Rye356b both express skepticism about the wheels being replicas. @HBvdubber even notes the car could face challenges in pricing compared to similar models, and several others raise concerns about customization possibly limiting the buyer pool. @yrhmblsrvnt highlights his reservations about the car's engine history, suggesting a troubling repair saga, which paints a less favorable picture in the context of its overall appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's overall design and condition. @MrOffshore describes it as one of the most beautifully designed cars to drive down the road, while @theforce88 calls it a gorgeous car and wishes the seller good luck. @Scliffe acknowledges the car's appeal but notes a detail about the wheels, showing that the community is engaged and interested in the authenticity of the vehicle's parts.
Neutral: The seller, @Krakken, interacts with various inquiries regarding the car's features and condition. @lawmaw22 asks about an oil leak, and @Krakken provides information indicating it is minor, describing it as a typical 'old jag drip.' Additionally, @Krakken addresses concerns about the tire condition and suspension with a promise to provide further images and clarifications, demonstrating a commitment to transparency.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the vehicle's components. @bstonetr6 requests detailed photographs of the suspension and floor pans, hinting at potential worries about the car's underlying condition. @RBF69 explicitly asks about corrosion and whether the car is suitable for daily driving, reflecting apprehensions that may detract from the vehicle's desirability. Finally, comments about the wheels lacking three-eared knockoffs contribute to a sense of alarm regarding authenticity and safety.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its unique engine. @BSteeleRVA noted that the BMW power plant is rare and impressive, with only about 100 units produced annually during that period of BMW's influence over Land Rover. @Johnny3 also commented that the engine works well in this setup and has a great sound. Similarly, @gogounou expressed excitement about seeing South African 110s with the M52 engine come to market, affirming their desirability with a 'GLWTA' (Good Luck With The Auction) message. The seller, @Joscher, emphasized the rarity of the Defender model with its factory-installed BMW M52 2.8i engine as a special feature, further augmenting its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments provided clarifications and interesting tidbits about the vehicle's specifications and background. @WAGONBOYTD pointed out that technically the vehicle is a soft top, not a pickup, correcting a common misconception. @2hecknback acknowledged the soft top configuration while remarking on its full specification beachrunner setup. The seller, @Joscher, provided detailed descriptions of the vehicle's history and construction process, clarifying its original factory configuration and the restoration that took place. These factual exchanges contribute to a clearer understanding of the vehicle's history and specifications.
Negative: Challenges concerning the vehicle's history were also noted, particularly regarding its original configuration. @WAGONBOYTD asserted that the VIN indicates the vehicle was originally a three-door hardtop rather than a pickup. He emphasized that this was confirmed through the VIN's alignment with known production facts. @Joscher, the seller, acknowledged this confusion but stated it was purchased as a pickup and speculated that an earlier conversion may have occurred under previous ownership. This highlighted a degree of uncertainty about the vehicle's past which may be a concern for some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @drivfour (The Seller) highlights the classic Audi's driveability, mentioning that it runs well and has low mileage, ensuring potential buyers that it can perform without issues. They have provided a video demonstrating the vehicle's capabilities, including cold starts and smooth gear shifts, which have likely reassured interested parties. The overall condition is seen as a solid foundation for a project car, with @awswerks expressing intrigue and assessing the potential value within the price range.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition and fitment, with @Darkvoltage and @maack.b5 asking about the hood's alignment and the car's overall driveability. @mcleodhky, a local potential buyer from Denver, is interested in arranging a viewing of the S4, showcasing a level of serious interest but also emphasizing the need for physical inspection before making a decision. Additionally, @fleetct seeks clarity on the timing belt recommendation, questioning whether it's due to age or caused by any performance issues, reflecting a common concern in used vehicles.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the vehicle's past, with @MoparMopar questioning if prior damage led to airbag deployment, to which @drivfour (The Seller) clarified that no airbags had been deployed when they purchased the car. @bighitbiker3 asks for confirmation about the car's operational status and if any videos exist demonstrating its driving capabilities, indicating some distrust about the vehicle's functionality. The need for timing belt and valve cover gasket replacements signals potential future expenses and maintenance that prospective buyers may find disconcerting.
|
|
|