Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the Monomille GT as drop-dead gorgeous and much cooler than anything else, praising its stunning design and uniqueness. @itheman expresses a heartfelt reaction, while @RacerRick and @Slam105 commend the car's beauty and call it outstanding. @MercuryKG7H notes the impressive potential of the car, emphasizing that it isn't something for the elderly. Many comments highlight nostalgia and admiration, with @oldwrench reminiscing about his childhood obsession with the car and @Nordschleife offering accolades on its historic significance and racing pedigree, expressing hope for a new owner who will continue its legacy on the track.
Neutral: The seller, @FantasyJunction, provides a thorough overview of the Fiat-Abarth Monomille, noting its historical context and availability for viewing at their showroom. The seller shares details about prior ownership and restoration efforts, mentioning the car's origins and previous notable owners like Mahlon Craft. Several commenters reflect on their experiences with Abarths, with @ProCoach sharing insights about the racing scene and ownership history of this specific car. @Yale discusses the historical background of the Abarth brand and its relationship with Fiat, enriching the conversation around the car's cultural significance.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition are present among some comments, with @Hmachado expressing apprehension regarding the compression test results and the implications for the twin cam head's rarity and potential brittleness. @SRB mentions dissatisfaction with the amount of racing footage available, indicating that it doesn't adequately showcase the car's performance. Additionally, @wpl510 raises questions about a potential cylinder leakage test to further investigate the engine's health, while others ponder the overall challenges regarding fitting in the car due to its compact size, as observed by @traveler_1701. Overall, while many are enthused about the car, there are anxieties regarding its performance and maintainability.
 |
 |
Positive: Commentors are overwhelmingly impressed with the vehicle, highlighting its outstanding condition, maintenance, and overall beauty. @TheUnderminer expresses confidence in the meticulous care the car has received throughout its 25 years, while many others, like @Turbojoe13 and @DC_CB, succinctly state their admiration with words like 'Beauty!' and 'Magnificent!'. @Mychordistooshort provides a detailed compliment regarding the car's brilliant photography, perfect wheels, and fantastic color combination, appreciating the 'unbelievable' condition of the vehicle. The admiration is echoed by @Vtec4ever, who describes the NSX model as one of the nicest and expresses a strong desire for acquisition. @Toptime79 reminisces about their own NSX, showing how deeply the car resonates with fellow NSX enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments touch on more neutral aspects, such as inquiries about specific details of the car. @IMAGINETHAT asks the seller about maintenance records, demonstrating an interest in the vehicle's history without overtly casting judgment. @shern provides clarifying insights regarding the aftermarket modifications on the car's exterior while complimenting the presentation. @Fikemurst seeks additional information about service records and suspension modifications, indicative of a careful approach to bidding rather than outright criticism or praise. Overall, these comments reflect a balanced curiosity about the NSX, as well as efforts to ensure potential buyers are well-informed.
Negative: Comments that lean towards the negative are rare but do exist in a subtle form. @Fikemurst expresses concerns over the absence of service records and questions if the car has undergone suspension modifications, which indicates a level of skepticism regarding the car's complete history. Additionally, @Vtec4ever expresses regret about the price range of the vehicle, implying that their enthusiasm is tempered by financial limitations. Although these sentiments do not directly criticize the vehicle itself, they reveal some hesitation about the purchase process, reflecting concerns common among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments appreciate the vehicle's impressive condition and aesthetic appeal. @Bay22 noted that while the description mentioned Seal Gray, the build sheet reflected Slate Grey, suggesting it may be a more desirable color. @specialkjupiter praised the car as a beautiful example and top of the food chain, while @boaboyoz described it as 'magic' in Slate Grey Metallic. @01996tt called the slate grey a 'pure magic' color for a Porsche 911. Furthermore, @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) highlighted the car's low mileage, unique manual transmission feature, and extensive options, reinforcing its desirability.
Neutral: Several inquiries focused on the vehicle's specifications and maintenance history, particularly regarding the IMS bearing, a critical concern for this model. @Termite.rm and @116610LV both raised questions about whether the IMS was done on this vehicle. Comments from @rjpar3 and others provided insight into checking the IMS bearing and oil analysis, showcasing potential buyers' interest in thorough mechanics checks. @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) responded that they did not have IMS details but confirmed that the vehicle has light tinting on its windows and offered to post paint meter readings upon request.
Negative: There were a few concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance and specifics. @delmarfinancial recommended getting the IMS and chain tensioners replaced as a precaution, reflecting apprehension about potential issues. @DarrenR_STL and @997.GTS questioned the presence of the headlights washers typical in 996.2 models, hinting at a lack of clarity on original options. Additionally, @comedian requested further details on the IMS, which was not readily available, leading to some skepticism among prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @AcornMustang commented on the vehicle's paint, noting it's held up better compared to his similar model. @muhucowboy praised it as a neat one-owner car, while @Nefauto90280 appreciated the rare condition of this GT, highlighting its authentic representation of early '90s street racing culture. @mcompos emphasized the vehicle's beautiful color combination and proper options, predicting a good sale, and @p1_motorcars_ltd remarked on the vintage appeal of these 2-tone GTs, suggesting that time has improved their aesthetic value.
Neutral: @dkeng provided observations about the car's condition, noting the replaced clutch and flywheel but indicating some missing details about the vehicle's history. @Ycbmsma and @jp0051 requested additional photos to verify details such as the VIN tag and the driver's seat condition, reflecting typical buyer curiosity. @Todd_Z. acknowledged the upgraded alternator as a beneficial modification while engaging directly with the seller for specifics.
Negative: However, there were concerns highlighted by @aflint11 who suspected the vehicle had been repainted at some point based on the underside photos. @Zeusmonster expressed skepticism about the painting quality and requested more information about the repainting process, as he noted potential issues with the visibility of body VIN tags underneath the new layers. @Thomas54 noted a preference against the four-lug wheels, and @dbrown1185 shared frustration over license plate brackets possibly affecting aesthetics.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters shared their fond memories and positive experiences with the Fiat X1/9, highlighting it as a fun and agile car. @Spudster mentioned the joy of driving the car and complimented its newer paint job, while @rustyray rated it highly in terms of enjoyment, stating it deserves a perfect score on the fun-o-meter. @JohnF1966 echoed this sentiment, stating that the car provides an exhilarating go-kart-like experience, making it one of their favorites. @Vtec4ever reminisced about the thrill of driving one in college, describing it as snug and quick in handling. Many users, including @WolverineACE and @ScottNThompson, praised the car's overall driveability and economical performance, reflecting a strong community appreciation for the X1/9.
Neutral: Several users contributed factual information or made observations without strong opinions either way. @Evannice asked for clarification regarding the engine type, noting a discrepancy between the auction's writeup and the photos. @MPC_Concierge, acting as the seller, confirmed that the 1980 model was indeed carbureted and not equipped with Bosch EFI, which clarified a potential point of confusion. @Fiatplus provided detailed historical context about the production of the X1/9, especially regarding its emissions systems and fuel options in different regions. There were also discussions around design elements and specifications from various years, leading to a deeper understanding of the vehicle's evolution without leaning towards overtly positive or negative sentiments.
Negative: Some comments reflected on the drawbacks or issues of the Fiat X1/9, particularly regarding mechanical reliability and rust problems common in older models. @WolverineACE mentioned the surface rust found on the car being discussed, which could be a concern for potential buyers hoping for a long-term vehicle. @MRF shared that while their own X1/9 was generally reliable, they experienced troublesome syncros that required constant adjustment. @TonyDiet added that while the 4-speed transmissions are easy to rebuild, he faced difficulties with shifting, pointing out potential maintenance challenges. Additionally, @JimD01 raised concerns about the actual condition due to the car's repainting, suggesting that buyers should inspect the car personally to gauge its true state, highlighting the risks associated with older vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle being auctioned, a 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL500, received enthusiastic praise from @Topwheelsint (The Seller), highlighting features such as the panoramic glass roof and Keyless-Go system. The seller emphasizes that the car, with only 49k original miles, has been well maintained and is in excellent condition, with all electronics, A/C, and retractable hardtop functioning perfectly. Many commenters, including @chickmann and @53mugsy, expressed interest in various features and functionality, showing a clear appreciation for its performance and design.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about the vehicle's maintenance history and specific functionalities. For instance, @Scagneti sought clarification on the battery replacement history, while @Mike6613 questioned the display screen's dimness. @jpmottet asked about tire dates and potential wheel rash, and @seagull2 sought confirmations regarding malfunction indications on the dashboard. Overall, these questions indicated that potential buyers are assessing the vehicle thoroughly, but there were no overt red flags indicated in the responses.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding specific issues such as the battery's replacement frequency, which @Scagneti noted could imply underlying problems. The air conditioning system, despite @chickmann's confirmation of its operation, faced scrutiny over the aesthetic condition of control buttons, which appeared scratched. Additionally, @seagull2's question about remote start indicated an expectation that this feature might be standard; its absence was acknowledged by @Topwheelsint, which may be a downside for some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @daIIas describes Francine as beautiful and mentions their own nearly identical GTLM, calling it fantastic and their favorite car. @Kevozzi57 shares a fond recollection of driving their 2005 GTLM for four years, expressing confidence that the new owner will enjoy many happy years with the rare cabriolet. @rotorhead60 provides extensive details on the GTLM's race pedigree, highlighting its unique design, history, and performance, while wishing the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: @irishwhiskey and @thedevilinside both mention the low mileage reported on the vehicle and express curiosity about its usage. @Henryturchi offers insights into the production numbers of the GTLM variant, comparing it to the base model and displaying enthusiasm for its appearance on BaT. @kta_NC shares their positive experience owning a GTLM for over eight years with active community participation, inviting interested bidders to view their car in person.
Negative: @whipstang notes the concern regarding tires due to their age, while @triumph27 calls attention to the original 20-year-old tires, labeling it strange. @1porsche_geek humorously comments on the aesthetic appeal of the car by making a comparison that suggests he finds the vehicle odd, likening it to his appearance after dental surgery.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's appearance, highlighting its beauty and luxurious features. @dmnmkmcm5 noted it as a "beautiful truck," and @Murphyman636 echoed this sentiment while actively seeking a Rover. The vehicle's original sticker price of $171,990 was mentioned by @MK_Ultra, who described it as having significant high-end features like HUD, contributing to its allure. Some users, such as @4WHEEL_GERMAN, the seller, provided assurances about the vehicle's condition, sharing service updates including a recent cooling system service and confirming the absence of smoke odors.
Neutral: Several commenters posed inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and history. @Gotgolfmd sought clarification on the title's repossession stamp and its implications, while @AlfistiNYC and @Murphyman636 both showed interest in the vehicle’s recall status regarding front knuckle cracks. @curtisnb and @macdb9 asked about the operational status of certain features, such as the heads-up display and rear seat entertainment screens, indicating the vehicle's luxury technology features were a point of interest. @socaltime inquired about a chip on the bumper, suggesting that visual condition details remained important to potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns about potential issues with the vehicle were raised. The repossession stamp was questioned by multiple commenters, causing some apprehension about the past ownership history, with @mk_ultra pointing out the risks associated with financing a third-owner luxury vehicle. Additionally, @minhchu highlighted the timing chain maintenance as a risk, noting that it hadn't been serviced, which led to further discussions about the vehicle's long-term reliability. The potential issues surrounding the timing chain were echoed by @Complete, who raised awareness of recent problems in similar models. These points of view indicate a cautious sentiment among some of the commenters regarding the vehicle’s history and maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and desirability. @cruisewoodward described it as a "sweet ride" and others like @JCaroccio and @saa106 praised its phenomenal sound and presentation. @mkxair mentioned it as an "end of an era" with low mileage, while @RumbleAuto appreciated it as a well-presented, desirable example of the 997.1 Turbo. @01996tt even described it as a 'mean creature' with remarkable interior condition, and @BryX called it one of the best production cars ever made, emphasizing that these cars are a true joy to drive.
Neutral: There were various inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and features, reflecting a keen interest in details. @autonitis asked whether the rear spoiler functioned properly, to which @jackvosney (The Seller) confirmed that it does. Additionally, @hefty_smurf and @LeadingQuestion posed questions about potential issues with coolant lines and the status of service records. Others sought clarity on modifications, such as lowering springs or suspension noise, while @smcgurk1 directed attention to its price range, calling it potentially out of reach for them, yet still a vehicle worth watching.
Negative: Some comments contained concerns and critiques about specific aspects of the car. @ScottNThompson noted that the tires negatively affected his view of the car, and @Thunderstealer raised inquiries about the DME over-rev report, seeking specific insights that were not readily available. There were also questions about whether the original wheels were included, with @jackvosney stating they were not, which could disappoint potential buyers. These comments suggest that while the vehicle is highly regarded, there are still uncertainties and concerns that may hinder some interest.
|
Fuel-Injected, Ram Jet 502-Powered ’69 Chevrolet Camaro Convertible 6-Speed
AZ402383
Lot 226499
Private Party
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a generally positive sentiment towards the vehicle, with @Lexoma and @e9er praising its beauty, particularly highlighting the desirability of the first-gen 1969 Camaro, especially with the RS option. @Trifiveron described it as an "eye catcher," while @Lancer13 noted the uniqueness of its color and interior. Both @Sparky5858 and @Sleeper519 expressed their admiration for the build and the color, indicating that it has a lot of appeal for potential buyers. Notably, longtime Camaro enthusiast @scottieJalowsky expressed strong hope that he would win the bid for this stunning vehicle, remarking on its impressive quality.
Neutral: There were also comments seeking clarification on the car's history and features. @csptrn raised questions about the timeline of the vehicle's completion and noted a discrepancy in the seller's claims about driving the car. @Ralphmanfredidc inquired whether the car had undergone any dyno testing for performance evaluation. @Thetruskstopshere (The Seller) addressed these inquiries, explaining that he had not driven the car extensively and wasn't able to showcase its performance due to limited use. Additionally, the seller indicated that they were in the process of creating a driving video, showing a willingness to engage with the comments regarding the car's performance.
Negative: However, some viewers expressed frustrations regarding the lack of a driving video demonstrating the car in action. @Dickiee and @Sparky5858 both emphasized that a proper driving video was crucial for potential bidders, suggesting that the absence of this could deter offers. @csptrn echoed this sentiment, stating that it had been a repeated request since the car was posted. Furthermore, concerns arose regarding the seller's driving history with the vehicle, with questions about mileage and engine performance leading to skepticism among some commenters about the car's readiness for sale. Overall, while there is a lot of enthusiasm for the car, there are credible concerns that may affect the bidding process.
|
2022 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 3500XD Midwest Automotive Designs Ultimate Toy
W1X8ED3Y0MT070650
Lot 226500
Dealer
 |
Positive: @P1Miami (The Seller) expresses pride in offering a one-owner 2022 Mercedes Sprinter 3500XD with very low mileage, used infrequently for family trips, and emphasizes the excitement of auction participation. @nexusautobrokers praises the vehicle, referring to their own experiences with it, showcasing a positive sentiment shared in the community. Additionally, @JustaGlitch comments on the vehicle's appeal, imagining fun outings loaded with golf clubs, reinforcing the vehicle's recreational potential.
Neutral: Several commenters engage with the seller and raise questions regarding the vehicle's specifications and features. @BlackthorneM inquires about a separate generator for the roof AC and battery usage, reflecting curiosity about performance. @Wandering_Lens asks for details on tank capacities and battery setups, demonstrating a neutral investigative interest rather than outright positivity or negativity. @P1Miami (The Seller) provides answers, mentioning the AC operates off a large battery pack and the water tank sizes, contributing to the information flow.
Negative: Some comments point out flaws in the vehicle's design. @BabsJag expresses concern regarding the kitchenette and bathroom being within a small space, characterizing it as a poor design choice by Mercedes-Benz. @sbaschn shares apprehension about the lien process involved in purchasing, recalling a past negative experience with vehicle transactions and questioning the guarantees in place to ensure safe title transfer. @Ferusa also seeks reassurance regarding the payment timeline concerning the lien, highlighting potential buyer stress.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle's overall appearance and condition, highlighting its maintenance history and reliability. @Chesslesson noted it as a beautiful truck with comments from both @jrabb100 and @TSR90210 affirming its pristine upkeep and long-term durability. @Hoodude and @diefdav echoed sentiments of the truck being in great shape, with @HardYard complimenting the seller's responsiveness to queries, leading to a positive perception of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several users asked specific questions about the vehicle's features and condition, such as @Ptrem inquiring about heated seats and @jordanl6806 requesting pictures of the rear axle. @1O111 sought a driving video while others were curious about the performance of components like the cruise control and windows. The seller, @trojanowl, answered each inquiry thoroughly, maintaining engagement with potential buyers and providing transparency about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's history and potential issues. @diefdav pointed out possible rust in certain frame areas from past winters, while @jibbles asked about the status of the telescoping antenna and power window motors. @jdsal inquired about oil leaks from the birfields, expressing a general caution about the vehicle's upkeep. However, @trojanowl addressed these concerns directly, reassuring potential buyers of the vehicle's good condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle's build quality, particularly appreciating the 409 motor and the attention to detail in its construction. @MichaelRyerson calls it a 'super little hauler' and praises the overall design, stating, 'Life is good.' @K51020Ranch echoes similar sentiments, stating, "I love that it has a 409 motor, very cool build!" Others like @mike_rockwell and @mark01 commend the truck's exterior look, stance, and color combination, with @mike_rockwell noting its perfect exterior look and stance, suggesting it's a strong candidate for bidding. Additionally, @gots2jump is particularly impressed with the wiring setup, further highlighting the meticulous details that went into the build.
Neutral: There are inquiries about the vehicle's features that are not standard, such as heating and air conditioning, as well as the presence of windshield wipers and an emergency brake. @TMbat asks about adding a/c and if heat is available, while @GPelissier raises concerns about the lack of wipers and the possibility of installing these features, considering them potential deal breakers. Seller @F40_Motorsports responds to the questions, indicating that no wipers or e-brake are present, but they could look into installing heating and AC. The nature of the vehicle's diverse audience also reflects varying opinions on its aesthetics and practicality.
Negative: Some comments express frustration or concern regarding the vehicle's modifications and missing features. @CKACZKA78 points out the absence of windshield wipers, emphasizing its importance for inspections. The absence of heating and air conditioning as features raised concerns for several potential buyers. Additionally, @markccmw questions the seller's status, asking if they are a private party, which indicates some uncertainty about the sale. @Denniec provides technical advice regarding installing a wiper motor, suggesting issues outside the vehicle's current setup could arise for buyers looking for practical everyday use.
|
 |
Positive: @Autogalerie-us (The Seller) expresses excitement about the E93 M3, describing it as a great vehicle with a "smile filled future ahead of it." They highlight their trustworthiness with over 190 completed auctions on BAT, conveying a sense of confidence in the vehicle's quality and their selling process. The seller appreciates the engagement of potential buyers, emphasizing their openness to answer questions and encourage inspections, either in person or virtually.
Neutral: @Ctartaglia raises a valid concern regarding the potential need for rod bearing replacements, which seems to be a common topic among M3 owners. @S65BForty provides an estimated cost for this service, reflecting the standard procedures necessary for maintaining the vehicle. The seller confirms that the rod bearings have not been replaced but assures that the owner has performed other maintenance, with receipts available for review.
Negative: @spoddle points out concerns about apparent dark spots on the vehicle, prompting a direct response from @Autogalerie-us (The Seller) who clarifies that these spots are not issues with the car but rather artifacts from their camera. Additionally, @rhoyneriver questions the seller's short ownership duration, which raises concerns about the reasons behind selling the vehicle so soon after purchase.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous commendations for its stunning appearance and enjoyable driving experience. @Speedracer800 praises the DB9's beauty and expresses admiration for its well-maintained condition, calling it a remarkable example among Aston Martins. @Leigh745 echoes this sentiment, referring to these automobiles as tremendous to drive, while @TrailerNoob appreciates the color spec and mentions how many questions were previously addressed, indicating that potential buyers might find it appealing. Overall, many commenters believe it to be a beautiful car deserving of admiration.
Neutral: There have been some questions raised about the vehicle's mileage, with comments from @paullohman highlighting a discrepancy on the Carfax report and @ColoTom questioning the condition of the seats given the reported mileage. These concerns are met with explanations from @Ducman5220 (The Seller), who clarifies that the previous mileage recording was an error that came to light after extensive maintenance work, ensuring the car's actual usage is well within its stated range. The Owner also notes that while there are some minor imperfections, the car is generally well-kept and offers decent value for its age and performance.
Negative: Contrary to the positive sentiments, some users have pointed out potential issues that may concern prospective buyers. @Jamesk58 raises a notable concern about a common engine issue found in early DB9s, suggesting an engine tick that might require attention, leading to doubts about the vehicle's overall reliability. Additionally, @Babadawv shares experiences regarding common challenges faced by DB9 vehicles, such as scuffed dash veneer and foam failure in the seats. The seller addressed these issues but acknowledged their existence, indicating that while they are not uncommon, they may deter some cautious buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed positive views about the vehicle's performance and condition. @1969CamaroRalph noted that the truck looks great and @TreborPJ mentioned it could be a perfect ride for a responsible teenager, suggesting it has enough style and capability. Additionally, @59FUELIEIMPALA (The Seller) reassured potential buyers regarding the motor's reliability and provided plans for new videos showcasing the truck's performance, which adds credibility to the vehicle's quality.
Neutral: @JPM28 raised a question about why the seller is selling the vehicle soon after acquiring it, which @59FUELIEIMPALA (The Seller) answered by explaining a shift in focus to Ford Crew Cabs and the intent to sell multiple Super Cabs. @fivespin inquired about the tires and any vibrations while driving, prompting the seller to provide details about the tire wear and assurance that the vehicle tracks well at highway speeds, showing that concerns were met with transparency.
Negative: A few concerns were highlighted, particularly regarding the truck's condition. @fivespin pointed out possible irregular tire wear and the necessity for detailed pictures, indicating a lack of confidence in the tires' condition. @TreborPJ also raised a question about the motor's longevity with 180k miles, suggesting that potential issues might be on the horizon. Moreover, @59FUELIEIMPALA acknowledged a minor issue with a rear seal leaking slightly, which he noted would be a priority for maintenance, hinting at the vehicle needing some attention soon.
|
6k-Mile 2017 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Convertible 3LZ Z07 7-Speed
1G1YT3D63H5606474
Lot 226508
Private Party
 |
Positive: Several commenters, including @ap2_911 and @BigT77, praised the vehicle's specifications, highlighting its rarity and desirable features such as the manual transmission and the unique spice red interior. @silver63 noted the vehicle's impressive spec, indicating it should perform well in the auction. Additionally, @Yenko13 described the rare color combination as beautiful and mentioned the car's potential as a collector's item, further underscoring its appeal among enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Oldwood offered some interesting commentary regarding the vehicle's options, mentioning the rarity of the spice package and pointing out some discrepancies with the wheel options. This highlights the car's unique configuration, which may spark further interest among knowledgeable buyers. Meanwhile, @99viperacr, in addition to selling the car, provided practical information about the vehicle's tire dates and emphasized the significance of the window sticker in regard to dealer-installed options, which may be crucial for potential buyers in understanding the car's history.
Negative: A few concerns were expressed about the sale related to @BrooklynBoy58's questioning of why such a beautiful car was being sold so soon and @Oldwood's comparison to another model that sold for a slightly lower price. These comments suggest that potential buyers may be wary of the vehicle's market viability or the seller's motivations. Additionally, the observations about the options and configurations from @Oldwood might raise doubts for some buyers about the vehicle's authenticity and completeness, given the changes made to the original specifications.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the 1978 Euro-spec Mercedes-Benz 450 SE W116, noting its beautiful velour interior and distinctive features that set it apart from U.S. versions. @sutekh emphasized the advantages of the Euro-spec engine, while @quattro4Snow highlighted the car's special-order specifications and amenities such as the cabin heater. Enthusiasts like @Dollycat3 and @flyingdago appreciated its classic styling and overall condition, agreeing that the vehicle represents a timeless example of what made the W116 significant.
Neutral: Many participants in the comments sought clarification on specific features and conditions of the vehicle, reflecting a thoughtful engagement with the auction process. @David_P raised questions about the headlamp adjustment system and the presence of the Webasto heater, while @Lucien84 inquired about the car's timing chain and the condition of its seals. @Mario007 also asked detailed questions regarding the odometer and the windshield gaskets, indicating a diligent interest in the technical aspects of the car.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, there were concerns about certain issues. @Mario007 pointed out the hard, cracked rubber seals and questioned the paint quality, suggesting it displayed orange peel, which could require expensive repairs. Additionally, @5gearsinreverse flagged a typo regarding the non-functioning cassette stereo, indicating potential caution around other mechanical aspects of the vehicle. @shervinator recommended reverting the car to its original factory specifications, hinting at the compromises made during the car's importation to the U.S.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments from users, with @overlandish expressing excitement about its overall appearance, stating "Wow, this is fantastic!" @e9er reminisces about childhood dreams of owning a four-wheel drive version and shares admiration for the truck’s colors, saying, "Love the colors on this one." @scubaJ mentions the extensive service papers available, implying the vehicle is well-maintained, and @tista humorously notes the personal passion and happiness associated with owning such a classic rig.
Neutral: Some comments revolve around inquiries about the vehicle's shipping and importation processes. @JBMO asks about getting the truck across the border, and @InLawsAttic seeks information regarding tariff taxes. @tonyloschiavo (The Seller) reassures that importing it should be relatively simple. Additionally, discussions arise around the engine specifications, with @Kyleivan and @aksarben asking technical questions regarding the LS3 engine's history and modifications, to which the seller provides detailed answers.
Negative: On the downside, some users raise concerns or seek clarifications about possible issues with the vehicle. @Wheels4life inquires about stains in the cargo area and carpet options, while @Roadmonster asks if the vehicle will pass certification in Ontario and if there are any mechanical issues that could prevent it. These comments highlight potential worries about the vehicle's condition despite its many favorable attributes, suggesting that prospective buyers may have reservations regarding its reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @atexan noted that the vehicle is a true '70s street machine with potential for daily driving, and they loved the striking yellow color. @borninthe60s praised the Cougar's aesthetics, commenting on the vibrant color combination of yellow paint and white interior that really captured the essence of the '70s. Other users like @DENWERKS also expressed fond memories associated with the vehicle, describing it as a classy car that drove better than its contemporaries, including the Mustang. @HighDesertMotors, the seller, engaged with the community, offering videos of the car in action and expressing enthusiasm about the interest it has generated.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarifications and additional information about the vehicle. @ddama1 requested the vehicle dimensions, and @z28th1s inquired about tire sizes, revealing a keen interest in details important for potential buyers. @F4R4D4Y and @USAFTommy asked practical questions regarding the vehicle's horn functionality and the location of air shocks, respectively. The seller responded promptly to these inquiries, highlighting transparency and openness in their communication.
Negative: Concerns were raised by users such as @HighSpeedPursuit, who noticed significant fluid under the vehicle and questioned whether leaks had been repaired. @SONGARRO echoed this by requesting identification of leaks and noting that the tire stamps indicated the tires were over 16 years old. @Dickiee expressed confusion over the bidding price in comparison to the car's condition and history, especially regarding the odometer's reliability and the absence of corrected titling documentation. These comments indicate apprehensions about the vehicle's maintenance and overall value.
|
2.14L-Stroker-Powered 1999 Subaru Impreza WRX STi Version VI Type RA Limited
GC8092436
Lot 226512
Private Party
 |
Positive: @p1_motorcars_ltd highlights the impressive quality of the vehicle, noting it remains a stylish 'grocery getter' despite its need for sale. @mprezive expresses desire for the car and acknowledges its beauty, while @Bullish praises the model as underrated in the U.S., indicating strong support for the seller and the car's value. @Ze_butler describes it as a dream car, reflecting a shared admiration among potential buyers.
Neutral: @429throttle (The Seller) clarifies that the car was street-tuned but not dyno-tested, and explains its setup, including the stock turbo system and plans for increased horsepower with modifications. @mprezive asks practical questions regarding power and potential issues, indicating a serious interest in the car's performance capabilities. The seller is proactive in adding videos, updates, and details about the engine build to the auction, showing commitment to transparency and customer engagement.
Negative: @gumby74 points out concerning areas underneath the vehicle, suggesting previous documentation fell short. @mprezive conveys frustration with the timing of the sale, indicating a strong desire to own the vehicle but feeling it is currently out of reach. @mprezive further inquires about issues with the transmission, showcasing concern about potential mechanical problems and solidifying skepticism around the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @DonPatrizio commended the beautiful dark blue color of the vehicle, highlighting its stunning appearance. @BiHi remarked that the Cayenne is a good comparison to their own vehicle, indicating a positive impression of its features. @Jpreston123 (The Seller) responded positively to multiple inquiries, expressing enthusiasm about the Cayenne S's maintenance history and its overall aesthetic, confirming that it is in excellent condition with well-documented service records. Other comments, including those expressing appreciation for the options and specs, also emphasized the vehicle's quality.
Neutral: @chuckd12345 raised a question about a noted accident from Carfax, reflecting curiosity about more details. @ozinus inquired about the transfer case and requested video evidence of ride height adjustments, indicating a need for more technical information. @Akamomo asked for clarification about active cruise control, showing an interest in the vehicle's technology features without expressing a strong opinion either way. @Jpreston123 (The Seller) engaged with each of these inquiries, illustrating the auction's interactive nature.
Negative: @ozinus expressed the need for clarity regarding the transfer case's verification by asking for a date and picture, which implies some doubt about the transfer case's condition. @pkbanc questioned the potential history of the vehicle having been smoked in, reflecting concern about any associated smells. @wood1565 requested a video of the engine at idle, suggesting skepticism about the vehicle's condition based on an earlier comment about its sound. @Grandpa and @Pkbanc further pushed for verification on connectivity and the vehicle's cleanliness, indicating a cautious approach to the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciated the overall durability and reliability of the Lexus GS300, with @scott802 mentioning his own experience of having owned the same model since new, racking up an impressive 289,000 miles. @rbelloff also expressed their fondness for the car, highlighting its great appearance and personal connection. The seller, @twothree, asserts that the car runs and drives great, has been well-maintained, and includes detailed servicing history from reputable sources, which bolsters its desirability among potential buyers.
Neutral: The seller provided thorough details about the car's condition, including video evidence of its functionality, and noted that the vehicle has a clean Carfax report with no accidents. However, there were questions regarding the timing belt inspection due to previous mileage and its potential need for replacement. @gav24 raised concerns about the cost of repainting and the timing belt, while others like @Clyde1 and @Carolinacarguy sought clarification on maintenance records and the timing of repairs, indicating potential areas of caution for buyers to consider.
Negative: Several comments pointed out areas of concern regarding the vehicle's condition. @Chihuahua warned about the risks associated with an aging radiator, suggesting immediate replacement. @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 noted discrepancies in the vehicle’s condition, hinting that some flaws may have been covered up prior to sale. Furthermore, @qsilver3 and @gav24 emphasized the need for various repairs and replacements, such as the timing belt and possible issues with door lock actuators, which could add additional costs for the buyer.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is being presented by @FineCarsLLC, which has a reputation for offering well-maintained cars, with rigorous checks like oil changes and transmission servicing conducted by a local mechanic. @FineCarsLLC also highlights their commitment to customer satisfaction, boasting a history of 5-star reviews and an aim to be a reputable seller on the Bring a Trailer auction platform. This specific model, a 2014 Mercedes E350 convertible, is claimed to be in excellent condition, featuring smooth shifting and no leaks, making it appealing to potential buyers.
Neutral: Commenters have raised inquiries about the vehicle's specifications, such as @steve.turley asking about the inclusion of blind spot assist, which @FineCarsLLC confirmed is absent. @Rbikefan1 expressed concerns regarding the 2014 model's hydraulic mechanism for the convertible top, suggesting potential issues related to fluid levels. @ap41563 inquired whether the air scarf system works on both seats, and @vicM805 requested a shipping quote, indicating interest but needing further logistical details.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism regarding the vehicle's mechanical reliability. @JD101 mentioned issues with the convertible top mechanism, while @Rbikefan1's mechanic advised to wait for newer models due to potential fluid system failures in the 2014 E350s. Additionally, @carlivar expressed frustration over Mercedes not offering models with a manual transmission in the U.S., hinting at a broader dissatisfaction with the brand's choices.
|
Fall-Line-Built, S54-Powered 1996 BMW M3 Coupe 5-Speed Race Car
WBSBG9322TEY73240
Lot 226517
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Hurlys reminisced about his fond memories with a similar E36 M3, highlighting the car's exceptional handling and track performance, suggesting that even average drivers would excel with it. @ephenstephen expressed admiration for the build quality, envisioning it as the ideal dedicated track car. @Spazdoc praised the car's design, lamenting missing out on it due to timing, and @block_mangler noted that the car leaves a significant impression at the track, citing its high-end components and well-preserved chassis as major positives.
Neutral: @desjef provided insights into the car's history and specifications, reassuring potential buyers regarding maintenance by reputable race shops and the car's clean accident history. Throughout the comments, he clarified details about the vehicle's modifications, race weight, cage design, and compliance with various racing series' regulations. @ILikePi asked technical questions about the vehicle's specifications, reflecting interest in its performance capabilities without overt criticism.
Negative: Some commenters hinted at potential areas for improvement, such as @leadslead51 suggesting the addition of a CAE shifter for better performance. @DanAMG expressed hesitations about the car's competitiveness in the Champcar series compared to other vehicles, particularly mentioning a comparison to high-performing Porsche Boxsters. @603blueM2 raised concerns about noise levels associated with the car's exhaust, which could be a limitation at certain tracks.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express excitement and admiration for the vehicle's rare features and overall performance. @vegastoburque highlights the desirability of these cars, stating that they are special and will be highly sought after in the future as evidenced by their current market price. Commenters like @WranglerX and @FuzzyDice appreciate the aesthetic appeal of the red, no-stripe version of the Mustang, praising its clean look and timeless design. Several users, including @scratch2 (The Seller), emphasize the exclusivity of this model due to its low production numbers, making it a true collector's item.
Neutral: Several comments focus on technical aspects, particularly concerning tire specifications. @Derrick966 and @new_hampster discuss the correct tire size for the vehicle, ensuring that potential buyers have the right information. Additionally, @PP0001 and others engage in discussions about the history and production details, particularly regarding the availability of stripes on the GT350R models. Some comments address concerns about oil consumption and the car's overall reliability, with users sharing their personal experiences with similar models.
Negative: A few comments reflect skepticism regarding the accuracy of production estimates and the rarity claims made by the seller. @PP0001 challenges @scratch2 (The Seller)'s assertions about the popularity and production specifics of the non-striped red models. Comments like those from @Nanashii highlight disagreements on opinions shared about vehicle ownership and reliability. @NVGT350 brings up concerns about fluid maintenance in borrowed vehicles, suggesting a bit of caution surrounding the car's history, and overall, there are indications of some doubts and clarifications needed regarding claims made about the model.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received glowing reviews from multiple commenters, highlighting its unique combination of power, rarity, and manual transmission—features that are hard to find in today's market. @Harbormotorcars calls it a 'Rare Bird' and emphasizes its value compared to competitors like the Audi R8 and Lamborghini Gallardo, suggesting it offers exceptional performance for the price. @BavarianHotwheels praises the car's specification and rarity, especially the manual gearbox with low mileage. @69_911e echoes this sentiment by noting the incredible driving experience the M6 offers at an attractive cost, while @sdrcp proclaims it as the best sounding BMW ever made, underscoring its emotional appeal.
Neutral: Some commenters expressed questions and curiosity about the vehicle's history and condition. @cannondalege raised concerns about why the last owner parted with it so soon, suggesting a sense of caution regarding the vehicle's reliability despite its many positive attributes. @MattE92 inquired whether the original sale fell through and if any upgrades had been made since the last listing. @endurance11, while interested in purchasing the M6, posed several detailed questions about aspects like the condition of rubber components, the driver’s seat, and trunk space, indicating a desire for thorough information before making a decision.
Negative: A few comments hinted at reservations about the vehicle. @Winblodgett questioned whether there had been issues with the car that led the previous buyer to return it, lending a note of skepticism about its reliability. Additionally, @cannondalege's caution about the frequency with which the M6's ownership has changed could indicate apprehension among potential buyers regarding the car’s long-term dependability. Furthermore, @bsiepka's comment about fitting golf clubs in the trunk suggests concerns about practicality, which might lead some to deliberate whether the M6 meets their everyday needs.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express excitement about the vehicle's potential and its overall charm, as highlighted by @805Trueblood's remark about its noticeable presence when driving. @Autogalerie-us (The Seller) notes the joy of presenting the 'BOSS BUG' and emphasizes their trusted reputation as a seller with extensive auction experience, inviting further engagement and questions. @Chrispc humorously points out the fun aspect of the quality sound system for survival scenarios, reflecting a lighthearted view of the buggy's appeal.
Neutral: @Autogalerie-us (The Seller) provides detailed responses to inquiries from potential buyers, offering to show more features of the vehicle and clarify its condition. There is a back-and-forth dialogue regarding issues like the non-functioning speedometer and questions about the engine's past water issues. Comments from @Nab2 and @fitzgm01 indicate ongoing curiosity about the vehicle's specifics, highlighting an active interest in ensuring the car’s integrity and functionality.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the vehicle's structural integrity and past maintenance issues, particularly by @Nab2 and @ferruginous, who question the presence of water in the oil and a possible bent front torsion bar assembly. @Bobolarkin highlights the potential difficulties of registering the vehicle due to title concerns, while @Davemarmot notes issues with the heating system, suggesting that it may have been disabled. These comments show a level of skepticism about the car's reliability and condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's overall aesthetics and condition. @jb9573 calls it a 'nice car and spec' and emphasizes that it is likely to fetch a solid price. @mtkatrev is excited about features like the red stitching, appreciating the visual details. @JoeCar58 describes the car as 'absolutely gorgeous' and notices its low mileage, which adds to its allure. Additionally, @NOTAFANOFTHEMINIVAN, who previously owned a Cayman R, remarks on how this vehicle will likely retain its value and deliver an enjoyable driving experience. Overall, commenters commend the car's appearance, maintenance, and market potential, positioning it as a desirable choice for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters discuss specific aspects of the car, such as its specifications and potential auction dynamics. @AKconquest, who helps with the listing, acknowledges that there is no DME report available, but mentions the car looks clean and is ready for bidding. @andy7777 points out the differences between the R and S models while others like @LayNout and @JerseyDirt engage in technical discussions regarding weight benefits and options that enhance the car's value. In general, the conversations provide insights into the features and market context without overtly positive or negative opinions about the vehicle.
Negative: Certain comments raise concerns or exhibit mild disappointment regarding the vehicle. @993pet notes that the car may need maintenance investment, hinting at potential hidden costs for the next owner. Additionally, @DTdub expresses cautious interest in the lack of a DME report, suggesting that such a report could influence bidding positively. @xDLXSFx's comment was flagged for being non-constructive, indicating that not all views are favorable or relevant. Meanwhile, @AKconquest indicates there are no immediate negatives in the car's performance or maintenance, suggesting a level of reassurance to balance out apprehensions about missing reports.
|
 |
Positive: @fmako mentioned that the vehicle will pass emissions inspection, despite not having Cats. Additionally, @anthonyjp expressed appreciation for the manual transmission, indicating a positive aspect of the vehicle's specifications.
Neutral: @buktseat and @Yellowstang6r raised valid questions about the documentation and paperwork related to the vehicle. @buktseat requested additional photos and documentation, while @Yellowstang6r inquired about how the title and registration would be handled given the Seller's location.
Negative: @Vrcbird asked about the presence of Cats implying concerns about emissions compliance and @anthonyjp criticized the lack of available photos, stating it was among the least he had seen on BaT. Furthermore, @fmako noted a past incident where the vehicle's license plate was backed into, suggesting previous issues.
|
 |
Positive: @aSingh39 (The Seller) introduces the auction for a beautiful GL vehicle, emphasizing the welcoming environment for prospective bidders. @Tonehound shares their positive experience purchasing a GL450 from @aSingh39, praising him as honest and friendly. Overall, the vehicle is presented positively by the seller and previous buyers, instilling confidence in potential bidders.
Neutral: The comments reflect a mix of inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly after a reported minor accident. @Tonehound asks specific questions about possible functional damage and the status of the rear sensors, to which @aSingh39 responds, indicating that no paintwork was done on the vehicle and that the parking sensors are fully operational. There are also questions about recalls and the air suspension system's functionality, which @aSingh39 addresses, stating there are no open recalls and confirming the air suspension is in excellent condition.
Negative: While there are no overtly negative comments, @Tonehound's initial inquiry regarding the accident report does suggest some concern about the vehicle's past damage. Additionally, there is a request from @belvinollc for more information and videos to assess the vehicle further, indicating that potential buyers are looking for reassurance regarding any underlying issues that might arise from the reported minor damage.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters like @p1_motorcars_ltd and @Shelbyhertz2006 highlighted the uniqueness and desirability of the 2005 Jaguar S-Type R, with @p1_motorcars_ltd noting its rarity in white. @Manhattan1 expressed a strong personal connection to the vehicle, stating that it is the best car he has owned, praising its supercharged power and smooth ride. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, promoted their reputation for quality and smooth transactions, emphasizing their commitment to customer satisfaction and transparent dealings.
Neutral: @jluvzcrz pointed out the beauty of the car but expressed doubts about its market value, recalling the challenges similar vehicles faced in recent years. The seller provided details about the vehicle's service history and encouraged potential buyers to inspect the car, emphasizing an open and transparent process. Other comments were varied, with some expressing curiosity about service records and specific vehicle aspects, such as fog lights, which @FISHTANKFISH noted were not visible.
Negative: Several comments reflected skepticism about the vehicle's ability to reach its estimated price of $40k. @jluvzcrz mentioned a comparable listing that struggled to sell, hinting at a declining interest in S-Type models. Concerns about the vehicle were raised by @ScottSki70 regarding a potential squeaking noise, which the seller attributed to external factors. Additionally, there were calls for further proof of the car's condition with suggestions for more videos and clarity on specifics like the tire age.
|
 |
Positive: @charrob6 (The Seller) highlights that he has been involved with BMW E39s for over a decade, providing potential buyers with assurance of his expertise and knowledge. @gabrielsrour praises the car's smooth drive and overall good condition, indicating no rust or mechanical issues encountered during his inspection. He expresses confidence that the next owner will be satisfied with the vehicle if they appreciate clean 540 E39s, suggesting a positive expectation for new buyers.
Neutral: In response to inquiries, @charrob6 (The Seller) clarifies that the car features factory-installed M Sport suspension, which is a point of interest for potential buyers. He also confirms the nature of the vehicle's blacked-out trim, assuring that it is factory-correct for the Canadian market. Additionally, he addresses inquiries about mechanical issues and confirms recent maintenance work, including the replacement of the lower timing chain tensioner without needing to replace the timing chain itself.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the car's short ownership period, pointed out by @markkus, who questions if this may indicate potential upcoming issues. @theek similarly asks about the timing chain's condition, reflecting apprehension regarding the vehicle's reliability. Although @charrob6 (The Seller) reassures that no known mechanical issues prompted the sale and provides documentation on prior maintenance, these queries suggest some buyers may still have lingering doubts about the vehicle's long-term performance.
|
 |
Positive: @MontanaBroncos expresses a joyful sentiment about the vehicle, indicating that there have been many enjoyable experiences ('lots of miles & smiles behind the wheel') with it. @Bigcountry75214 adds to this positivity by calling it a 'perfect beach cruiser', suggesting that the vehicle has qualities that make it a pleasant choice for leisurely activities like beach outings.
Neutral: @Houston95Bronco (The Seller) provides comprehensive information about the vehicle's condition, including the discovery of rust at the body mounts post-purchase. He mentions that such rust issues are common in vehicles from regions that use salt for icy roads, affirming transparency in the sale. Additionally, he describes efforts to improve the vehicle with various repairs and replacements, indicating a proactive approach to maintenance.
Negative: @hairyolds discusses the challenges associated with repairing the vehicle's rusted rear body area, implying that significant work would be required if the new owner wishes to address this issue. @gwatson66 raises concerns regarding the implications of the rusty body mounts on the vehicle's safety and drivability, indicating uncertainty and a need for clarity about the extent of the damage, reinforcing the worries potential buyers might have.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle in question, a BMW M5, is highly regarded by its seller, @davidga, who emphasizes its celebrated status as a performance sedan. He notes the car has been meticulously cared for, showcasing a clean and inviting interior that reflects responsible ownership. The seller encourages enthusiasts to appreciate its blend of design, usability, and exhilarating performance, highlighting the car's readiness for enjoyment without deferred maintenance. This sentiment is echoed by other commenters, with @Mark600 praising the car's overall presentation and the quality of the trim, indicating it appears to be in excellent condition despite its age.
Neutral: Several commenters have raised inquiries regarding the vehicle, such as @Ramsxc2015 questioning whether the exhaust system has any modifications, to which @davidga clarifies it only features a muffler delete. Others like @jtripp01 and @Fortis point out potential cosmetic imperfections, such as color discrepancies in the paint and scratches on the rear bumper. However, the seller has addressed these concerns by assuring that the minor cosmetic flaws are consistent with normal wear and tear, further sharing that the vehicle has no accident history aside from a minor dealership entry from 2003.
Negative: Concerns have been raised among potential buyers regarding various cosmetic issues observed in the vehicle's exterior. Commenters like @owerrc and @piercer0723 have pointed out apparent cracks in the rear bumper, which they suggest may require repair. Furthermore, @tbg22 noted the presence of a common dash pixel issue, prompting inquiries about the repair process and costs. These negative comments highlight a degree of uncertainty about the car's condition, suggesting that while the vehicle has been well-kept, it may still require attention in some areas to maintain its overall appeal.
|
20×9.5″ and 21×12.5″ Wheels for Porsche 911 GT3 RS
Four Porsche GT3 RS Wheels
Lot 226526
Private Party
 |
Positive: @brentjc7 (The Seller) confirmed that the wheels were properly balanced two years ago when removed from the GT3 RS, with minimal weight needed for balancing, indicating that there are no bends or run-out issues. He also clarified that the TPMS sensors and valve stems were removed for transfer to his new GT3 RS rims, providing reassurance about the current state of the wheels.
Neutral: Several users, such as @spdcrazy1 and @hyperspeedy, inquired about shipping costs to their respective areas. @brentjc7 (The Seller) provided an estimated cost range for shipping, noting that individual well-packaged wheels might cost between $50 to $100 each, while a full set could range from $200 to $400 or more. Additionally, there was a question from @Iger00 about whether the wheels would fit a 2018 911 Turbo S, to which the Seller expressed uncertainty regarding compatibility for a 2019 model due to potentially different offsets.
Negative: @JHBBII raised concerns about the wheels' condition, asking if they had recently been run on a balancer and whether the wheels balanced out to zero. The seller's previous comments might suggest that further investigation into their compatibility with specific vehicle models, as well as the absence of valve stems, could lead to customer reservations.
|
 |
Positive: @elz0808 has shared that the 2013 Ford Boss 302 Laguna Seca has been meticulously maintained and kept in a climate-controlled garage, only driven to events like Cars & Coffee and car shows. Commenters, such as @1994XR2 and @DennisKing, have praised the car's beauty and performance, noting it is faster than rival models like the E90 M3 and highlighting that it is a stunning collector's piece. @Amooreesq expressed that the price range for the vehicle seems reasonable, and should it sell below a certain threshold, it would represent a steal for the buyer.
Neutral: Comments by @jpburn3 and @PP0001 provided clarifications on the production stats of the Black Laguna Seca models, with @jpburn3 mentioning his own ownership of model #258 and sharing his driving experiences between his Boss 302 and a GT500. @PP0001 also noted the included owner's kit and asked for further verification on it, while other commenters discussed their own similar vehicles, showing a sense of camaraderie among Ford Mustang enthusiasts. @NITROXROX shared maintenance tips regarding the vehicle's coolant system, which could be beneficial for prospective buyers.
Negative: A few questions arose about the vehicle's details, such as whether it includes the track key, which @elz0808 confirmed is indeed included and activated. However, there were some concerns about potential issues stemming from older coolant types as highlighted by @NITROXROX in comments advising the future owner to update the coolant. Overall, while the comments were largely positive, the need for clarifications and maintenance updates shows that buyers are cautious and looking for assurance about the vehicle's upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's mechanical reliability and driving experience. @chse911 (The Seller) mentioned that the car is a joy to drive, capable of cruising at high speeds without issues. @ETG1 affirmed that it runs and drives smoothly, describing it as a solid example. @JGraham and @onlybmw1973 expressed their appreciation for the color combination and overall vibe of the car, emphasizing its potential as a thrilling driver. Additionally, @Grandoaks commended the quality of the tool cleanup.
Neutral: Several individuals had neutral comments regarding the vehicle's condition and updates. @Beavis1663 highlighted the exterior color and @dbarry shared a nostalgic remark about the seller's hometown, indicating a personal connection. Others like @Remoudry and @Ratbird inquired about specifics like the condition of the dashboard and trunk area without the carpet, demonstrating curiosity about the car's detailed state. @chse911 (The Seller) addressed these inquiries by promising more photos and clarifications on rust conditions, contributing to an ongoing conversation about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the car's aesthetic imperfections and its overall cosmetic condition. @etip pointed out the absence of pictures showing noted rust in specific areas, which @chse911 (The Seller) later addressed, although he admitted the trunk had some rust primarily attributed to moisture. @hoofhearted and others questioned the state of the fuel door and rust in door jams, reflecting worries about the car's maintenance and longevity. Overall, while many found the vehicle appealing, the compromises in its cosmetic aspects were a topic of discussion.
|
 |
Positive: @huskeric expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it one of their favorite sedans of all time. They praised the design, saying the lines are perfect and complimenting the headlights, describing the car as beautiful to look at. @meen shared their fondness for the vehicle as well, noting that it was their favorite and mentioning a number of performance modifications they made to it, which enhanced their experience with the car.
Neutral: @4wheel_german (The Seller) responded to various inquiries from potential buyers. They confirmed that the vehicle retains its catalysts and will be smogged for California buyers. The seller assured that all functions work properly and there are no active leaks, following recent servicing. They acknowledged the request for evidence regarding engine components and stated that while engine and transmission mounts have been replaced, they have no records regarding the flex disc.
Negative: @jupiterider raised concerns regarding potential head bolt failures in the M156 engines and whether these issues had been addressed in this specific vehicle. @jsjodin inquired about the original rims and whether the car would pass the California smog test, suggesting uncertainty about its compliance. @carguy389 pointed out common wear items like engine mounts and drive shaft flex discs, indicating that buyers should be aware of these concerns as they relate to the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @malouhos mentioned the vehicle looks like a nice one, indicating a favorable impression. @jmmorford also expressed interest in the vehicle, describing it as a nice looking rig, which adds to its positive perception. Despite some concerns, the general aesthetic appeal seems appreciated among commenters.
Neutral: Several users, including @jmmorford and @orchard, requested additional information and documentation regarding the vehicle. Comments included inquiries about features such as the heating core, cold start videos, and details about restoration receipts. These comments suggest that while there is interest, potential buyers seek more clarity and assurance about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history.
Negative: @jmmorford raised concerns about the lack of heating in a region like Oregon, emphasizing that no heat is a critical issue for potential buyers. Additionally, @19Willys46 commented on the seller's inactivity, hinting at a lack of engagement or responsiveness which could deter potential buyers. Furthermore, the absence of comments from the seller leaves an impression of uncertainty regarding the sale.
|
185-Mile 2020 Lincoln Continental Black Label Coach Door Edition
1LN6L9BC6L5605690
Lot 226536
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Rbeus1 (The Seller) expresses gratitude for the interest and highlights the vehicle as a pristine example of an iconic American sedan, detailing its pampered life. Commenters such as @Ramenator and @PWSchuh emphasize the unique travel experience and the Coach Door edition's significance, respectively. @Hemidakota appreciates the vehicle's maintenance as a demo and @Craven describes it as a very nice luxury sedan, while @Longmire45 sees the vehicle as a potential addition to a Club registry.
Neutral: Commenters like @Wagen59 admire the car's design, noting similarities to other prestigious brands, and @GnV64 raises practical questions about the vehicle's maintenance history. @Rbeus1 (The Seller) provides thorough explanations regarding the storage and care taken of the car, inviting interested parties to view it personally. @AlfaRomeoMilano compliments the luxurious interior, while @mick59 notes the car's presidential appearance.
Negative: Comments indicating concerns include @GnV64 questioning whether proper servicing has been conducted, suggesting a lack of transparency about the car's maintenance post-storage. @SwissBliss humorously wishes for additional modifications not present in the vehicle, pointing to a perceived deficiency. Additionally, @thalter's comment was flagged for being non-constructive, indicating potential negativity surrounding the vehicle's value or appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @Shaank94 (The Seller) mentions that they are happy to offer a nicely modified TJ that has been well cared for. @apollo7 notes that the vehicle appears to have avoided common rust issues typical in other vehicles, particularly praising its condition given its past locations in California and Texas. Overall, both comments portray the TJ as a beautiful vehicle ready for adventures on the trails.
Neutral: @coolguyallday inquires about the presence of a back seat, suggesting that it might be an important feature for potential buyers. In response, @Shaank94 (The Seller) acknowledges the oversight in the listing and confirms that the vehicle does indeed come with a back seat, promising to upload photos of it soon. This exchange indicates that some details in the listing may need clarification, but it does not diminish the overall appeal of the vehicle.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: @funracer praised the vehicle, describing it as a 'great car' that is 'gorgeous to look at', expressing satisfaction after owning the 04 model for seven years. @gleasj1 and @SCMike commented on the car's stunning appearance, with @gleasj1 calling it a 'real head turner' and @SCMike highlighting its beautiful color combination. The seller, @alancasey, stated that the car has been exclusively garage-kept and confirmed that all features, such as the air conditioning and windows, are in working order, further encouraging interest in the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments posed questions about the car's condition and history without expressing strong opinions. @Bidplacer inquired about the vehicle's storage, while @My25cents asked for interior photos and whether test drives were available. Questions regarding the vehicle's maintenance history were raised by @Tiwasko and @QCMC, who asked if specific components had been replaced. @Snowhill also expressed curiosity regarding the ownership timeline and mileage changes, while @goodfriends requested further inspection details. Overall, these inquiries show an interest in clarifying the car's condition but do not convey enthusiasm or disappointment.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @ernestcrabtree and @ims about the vehicle's condition, with @ernestcrabtree noting excessive wear on the undercarriage for its mileage and climate history, while @ims suggested that the stains observed on the top could indicate leaking hydraulic pistons. @Snowhill pointed out inconsistencies between the seller's statements and the Carfax report regarding ownership and mileage, reflecting doubts about the transparency of the vehicle's history. Lastly, @goodfriends expressed concern over the lack of documented brake work, prompting further questions on necessary maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: @allienjack commented on the eye-catching color of the vehicle, indicating it is a head-turner. @vaitx, the seller, described the Mustang as a nicely restored and fun to drive convertible, encouraging potential buyers to reach out with questions. @Mr_wbt shared a positive sentiment about the R134 refrigerant for the AC and expressed admiration for the color, saying it may complement his existing collection. Additionally, @ChasinFords mentioned that the aftermarket wheels enhance the car's look, suggesting it would make for an enjoyable driving experience.
Neutral: @hoback praised the quality of the pictures, calling them some of the best with detailed close-ups. @Woodland66 raised a question about a mysterious white substance in picture #83, prompting a helpful response from @PeachStateClassics, who identified it as possible paint chips. @CNCN3 also weighed in on the matter, suggesting that the "painted white" appearance was merely a reflection from the flash on the radiator. The seller, @vaitx, intends to address this concern by providing additional images.
Negative: @sully627 commented negatively on the quality of the first pictures, suggesting they were a bit blurry. @jcbarne noted some concerns regarding the back seat and the alignment of the Mustang emblem in pictures, which might detract from the overall presentation. @DragonPLP sought confirmation from the seller about the vehicle's condition, asking if there are any leaks, rust, or paint issues, indicating potential apprehensions about the car's quality.
|
 |
Positive: @mcl7777 remarked that this is a great example of a nice 944, expressing an interest in potentially selling their own 89 2.7-liter model. @I-need911 described the vehicle as "absolutely amazing!" while @JAY-Z reflected on their own lower mileage car, noting this one is a "museum piece." @SteveJG also praised the vehicle, calling it a complete gem and highlighting its similarities to his own. @TomT73 added that the car is a gem and even compared it favorably against his 83 944 Callaway Turbo, indicating it is in exceptional condition. @scottjferrarigiu confirmed the car looks like a time capsule, emphasizing its fantastic state.
Neutral: Many commenters engaged in discussions about the specifics of the car's features, such as the rarity of the three-spoked steering wheel noted by @AirBoss. @Quik944 and @951ltlwt debated the wheel configurations, with @Quik944 acknowledging that the N/A 944 traditionally had square setups. @Spokayman pointed out the tire specifications and the all around setup, appreciating the Pirelli tires. The seller made sure to address inquiries regarding service history, affirming the car's excellent condition and service record. @youngmotorcars mentioned that the vehicle had a clean Carfax report and had undergone recent servicing and updates, such as new tires.
Negative: Comments expressing concern included @e9er noting that the wheels on the passenger side seemed swapped, implying a lack of attention during the detailing process. @Carunch emphasized the importance of the timing belt replacement schedule, endorsing more diligence due to the car being over 40 years old. They suggested that the age of the timing belts is a crucial factor, irrespective of mileage. @Carunch further highlighted the need for regular inspections of the timing belts and questioned if previous maintenance had adhered to best practices. In response, @youngmotorcars assured that the timing belt was last serviced in May 2019, addressing concerns for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Blacklab mentioned that the updated coolant system is a significant upgrade, signaling improvement in maintenance and reliability. @QueenElizabeth3 praised the vehicle's appearance, noting that the DVD screens are factory-installed, indicating quality and authenticity to potential buyers. @onebadrover expressed that these vehicles are incredibly capable off-roaders, highlighting their reliability and praising the air-ride system. They noted that with some improvements like better tires and rock sliders, the vehicle could excel even more in off-road environments.
Neutral: @stylecars clarified that the DVD screens in the headrests are original OEM equipment, ensuring potential buyers of their authenticity. @stylecars also confirmed that the tire date codes are from 2019 and offered to provide a cold start video to assure buyers of the vehicle's condition. @NtrSandman raised concerns about inconsistencies in the window sticker's color description, which was responded to by @stylecars, explaining that the listing contains a digital reproduction that may have inaccuracies. Discussions around timing chain services revealed differing opinions, with @stylecars deciding to proactively handle the timing chains for the next owner, showing commitment to maintaining the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @Shepinsky and @pkbanc both raised concerns regarding the vehicle's timing chain service history, suggesting that the lack of documentation could be a red flag since these engines have a reputation for needing timely chain replacements. Additionally, @NtrSandman pointed out possible paint flaws that could indicate undetected repairs, which @stylecars countered by stating there are no records of paintwork, maintainining the car's original state. The overall discussion contains apprehension regarding the vehicle's previous service history and its impact on reliability, showcasing possible risks for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @magiro praised the vehicle as a "high-desert low mileage manual Tacoma" and described it as beautiful. @Vision also commented on the truck, calling it a very nice Tacoma. Many users expressed satisfaction regarding the condition and appearance of the truck, with @Hdecker83, the seller, mentioning that the seats look new and that he is willing to provide more information and visuals upon request. The seller also highlighted the vehicle's strong performance, stating he would trust it for a long drive, underscoring confidence in its reliability.
Neutral: Several users raised questions needing clarification about the vehicle's details. @TomLU86 asked for pictures of the steering wheel, instrument panel, and confirmation about the cruise control functionality. @Ndb111 requested videos of driving and the interior, while @SaabSailor inquired about the original tire size sticker. @Smokymatoka needed information about fitting a car seat in the back, which led to a dialogue with @Fitzroya providing insights on compatibility. The seller acknowledged these questions and committed to providing the necessary information.
Negative: Concerns were expressed regarding the vehicle's history and shipping costs. @ToyBoy2 expressed frustration over the high shipping costs for trucks located far away, while @Mownhoj wished for a different engine option after experiencing low gas mileage with his current V6. @nexttime raised a serious question regarding the keys for the truck after it had been previously stolen, implying potential issues with access or security related to the vehicle. Overall, while the truck appears appealing, apprehensions about some aspects of its history and logistics were noted.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the vehicle's aesthetics and modifications, noting its unique color and custom features. @Oldchevytruckguy highlighted the car's nostalgic appeal, mentioning the rarity of its color transformation from red to green. @stugottz expressed excitement about the custom touches and enjoyable driving experience of the Corvette, particularly admiring the side pipes. @Tobyallen also praised the modified C2 Corvette, specifically the metallic green color and overall custom look, suggesting it as a suitable option for someone interested in a modernized C2.
Neutral: Commenters provided informative insights on the car's condition and specifications. @4HuntingCars (The Seller) clarified that the car had been serviced after sitting through the winter, ensuring potential buyers of its readiness for the road. @Shootnride shared technical details about the engine, indicating its original horsepower and modifications, while @ValkTV's inquiry about the horsepower ratings sparked additional discussion about the engine's origins and modifications.
Negative: There were critiques regarding the modifications made to the vehicle. @Davey_in_BC noted that the car may not appeal to purists, highlighting the lack of manual steering alongside the manual brakes. Additionally, @bbilly expressed a humorous take about the color choice, suggesting it resembled a shade of 1960s house paint and commented on potential color blindness affecting perceptions. Overall, the comments reflect a mix of admiration and concerns about maintaining originality.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed their appreciation for the vehicle's overall appearance and performance attributes. @Adroit707 noted it as a clean vehicle that should do well given its age and mileage, expressing hope for a good home. @georgepehanick highlighted it as possibly the best performance luxury sedan produced in its era, specifically referencing models from 2003-2005. @MattMcIvor also complimented the color, stating that Tectite Grey is perfect for W220's.
Neutral: Several commenters sought further clarification regarding the vehicle's history and service records. @bpeverest raised concerns about the car being marked as "sold" twice yet still available, questioning the reasons behind these occurrences. @CICBarkeep and @oldenuf2nobettah noted service history inquiries, with @CICBarkeep mentioning a repair on the ride-height system and the absence of other service records, which is common for S55's observed in auctions.
Negative: Some commenters voiced concerns about the vehicle's potential issues. @CadeH519 pointed out that the engine cover appeared dirty and questioned possible oil leaks. @gscharnagl highlighted the lack of transparency regarding the previous non-sale situation, suggesting that it should have been disclosed. @smoothoperator713 (The Seller) acknowledged the past issues with non-paying buyers but reaffirmed that the suspension has been serviced and functional, although caution is advised due to the nature of the system.
|
 |
Positive: @Cdn043 praises the engineering of the JBL Cobra replica, highlighting its double overhead cam engine along with features like independent rear suspension and QA1 adjustable shocks. Similarly, @yukoncole notes the distinctiveness of the massive hood scoop, appreciating its uniqueness among Cobra replicas. @philbo427 expresses interest in the kit, acknowledging that while the 4.6 L Ford engine may not deliver high horsepower in stock form, it is reliable, recalling an Aston Martin with the same engine.
Neutral: @Ilovewob and @RBcobro share a positive view on the handling and appearance of the Cobra, although @Ilovewob remarks on its less original look by design. @orbit1962 (The Seller) promises to provide additional videos and images for prospective buyers, including a cold start video and pictures of the trunk. The discussions also reference gearing and RPM management, with @DashMcLovin mentioning that a 3.73 rear gear might benefit the smaller engine's performance although the RPM range raises questions for optimal cruising.
Negative: Concerns arise from @Theadrian questioning discrepancies in the suspension setup compared to representations in videos. @dparker1901 inquires about any past accidents or repairs, including fiberglass body repairs, while @ScaleMan1 asks about a scratch and its depth regarding the paint. @DashMcLovin also raises queries about the age of the tires and their condition, hinting at potential timing chain tension issues with the 4.6L engine.
|
1986 Volkswagen Vanagon Westfalia Wolfsburg Edition Syncro 5-Speed
WV2XB0250GG076001
Lot 226546
Private Party
 |
Positive: @troutbum789 (The Seller) expressed that the Syncro has been a special van since 2020, highlighting careful maintenance and reliability. @joeytwowheels, a fellow Syncro owner, complimented the van's condition and the detailed records. @Goldbondh2o referred to the vehicle as a 'Swiss Army Knife of unique, 1980s-era overlanding vehicles,' indicating a high level of interest and admiration for the capabilities of this model.
Neutral: @Fb47243 requested additional content in the form of a driving video to gain a better understanding of the vehicle’s performance. @AnyOldIron inquired about specific functions of the switches and whether it's possible to switch between 2WD and 4WD while in gear. @troutbum789 (The Seller) provided clarifications about the decoupler's operation and the history of the van, noting it originated in Ohio and has had several owners.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the AC functionality by @4nauto, as @troutbum789 (The Seller) confirmed the AC is not currently functional, having had parts removed due to age. Additionally, @Jed0312 asked about potential leaks and if a compression test had been performed, to which @troutbum789 mentioned minor oil drops after extended storage and indicated no compression test was conducted during his ownership. @benaakre questioned the stock transmission specifications, as there seemed to be some confusion about its capabilities.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the Thunderbird as a delightful example of a car, specifically noting its appealing color combination of white over black and white. @GeorgeLyons (The Seller) emphasized the car's solid condition, stating it has not undergone extensive rust repairs like many others and is a great driver with both hard and soft tops available. He communicated that the car runs well, starts easily, and offers a great driving experience, showcasing his confidence in the vehicle's performance.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle included inquiries about its features and specifications. @Rmac asked if the car had overdrive, to which @GeorgeLyons (The Seller) replied negatively, clarifying that the car does not have this feature. Additionally, multiple users debated the condition and functionality of specific parts, such as the power seat and convertible top installation, highlighting various aspects of the car's history and current state without reaching a conclusion on these matters.
Negative: Some commenters pointed out potential issues with the car's setup. @birddoc raised concerns about the absence of the power seat, questioning its conversion. @gocorcoran noted that the fender vents were apparently upside down, which could indicate a lack of attention to detail. There was also discussion about the missing components necessary for the convertible top to be properly stowed, suggesting that the seller may need to clarify or resolve these points to assure prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @kittenmittenz praised the vehicle’s specifications, expressing excitement to watch the auction, while @greystone highlighted that the absence of a sunroof enhances its great spec. @Mordecai complimented the beautiful presentation of the car, specifically noting the charm of the 2006 MINI R53 and R50 with JCW variants. @Wob, the seller, described the driving experience as fun and invigorating, especially for a JCW car with a six-speed transmission, enthusiastically stating that if one can’t enjoy this vehicle, they might as well drive a Prius.
Neutral: Several commenters requested additional information regarding the car's condition and history. @Rob383 asked if the car had been smoked in, to which @Wob clarified there was no smoke smell. @cmgefirm inquired about the CA smog certification, receiving confirmation from @Wob that a fresh certification would be provided for a California buyer. @brandon_burke raised a concern about potential rust on the frame, while @Redcheshirecat sought details about the roof lining and engine mount. The seller’s engagement in clarifying these points painted a thorough picture of the vehicle's state and procedural aspects of the auction.
Negative: Mixed feelings emerged regarding the quick resale of the vehicle, as @Moonlitmini noted it was likely sold at a loss. @13VT raised concerns about the recall related to the passenger occupancy sensor, suggesting potential issues for the new owner. @Toptime79 humorously contrasted the MINI driving experience with that of a Prius, suggesting that the car might fail to elicit the same joy in comparison. Additionally, @Stickerdick expressed confusion about the vehicle’s identity as a basic Cooper “S” with JCW components, questioning its high auction price compared to expectations for such specifications.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle, a impressive Corvette Z06 Coupe, has been highlighted for its exceptional appearance and performance features. Users expressed admiration for its striking red-on-red color combination and the powerful sound it produces during acceleration. Commentors like @GW.Huffalo shared positive experiences with the vehicle, noting that it has been driven extensively, which adds to its desirability. The seller, @CompassRacing, has proactively engaged with potential buyers, offering videos of the car in action and confirming it has not been tracked, adding to its appeal.
Neutral: Several comments raised important questions regarding the vehicle's options and service history. @vj123 and @bmwm5nut pointed out that the vehicle does not include a front axle lift, as incorrectly stated in the listing. @jbowers24 inquired about the necessary transmission service, which sparked further discussion about service records and maintenance practices among users. The seller acknowledged these queries and ensured transparency regarding the car's service history, aiming to uphold buyer confidence.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the minor damage reported on the CarFax due to the driver's side mirror, which left a shadow on the vehicle's overall appeal. @grayforge expressed disappointment that such damage even appeared on the report, while others noted the potential impact on resale value. Additionally, concerns about ensuring proper transmission service were highlighted by various users, with @HotVette stressing that lack of service documentation could void warranty, prompting apprehension from potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @TokyoMotorsDC provided thorough and reassuring answers to potential buyers about the vehicle's details and logistics. They clarified the purpose of what appeared to be a crushed pipe under the oil filter, explaining that it was a protective bracket and not structurally significant. They also confirmed that the tires are from 2020, in good condition, and offered a positive outlook on delivery options, stating they would connect interested buyers with shippers for nationwide transport.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on specific features and logistics, showing general interest in the vehicle's practicality. For instance, @Bob_Jackson inquired about the vehicle's weight and transport options, while @Rsm61 questioned the availability of parts and service for this type of pickup in the USA. Additionally, @Ngavrielidis1 asked about the presence of A/C, leading to further clarification from both the seller and other commenters.
Negative: While some questions indicated a lack of certain features, the responses addressed these concerns adequately. @Molae65 pointed out that the vehicle lacks A/C, which could be a drawback for some potential buyers who prioritize climate control. Overall, while there were concerns regarding specific functionalities, the responses appeared informative and satisfactory from the seller, minimizing negative feedback.
|
 |
Positive: @SunKissedImportsFLORIDA conveys excitement about the vehicle, calling it a bold design statement and a rare, modern classic. The seller highlights that the car, designed by Henrik Fisker, has only 33k miles and operates beautifully in both electric and range-extended modes. @Just_me praises the spectacular color on this design, which is made even more unique by its wrap, making it a true one-of-a-kind car. Additionally, several comments reflect enthusiasm and admiration for the car's aesthetics and driving smoothness.
Neutral: @Romer560, @CoastsideCat, and @WesleyRomberger ask practical questions regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, service documentation, and specific features like the paint beneath the wrap and battery performance. @SunKissedImportsFLORIDA responds with informative details, sharing the vehicle's service history and its operational condition. The seller reassures potential buyers about the car's capabilities, including its electric range and generator functionality which may appeal to those in areas with limited charging infrastructure.
Negative: Some comments imply skepticism or caution regarding the purchase of the vehicle. @AllClaSS and @Thinton jokingly suggest that owning a Fisker requires a special kind of commitment. Additionally, @WesleyRomberger raises concerns about the battery service history, asking about specific replacements and potential noises, which indicates a level of apprehension towards the unknown maintenance needs of such a specialty vehicle. @Kevin624's query about the number of keys provided hints at concerns over missing components, which further complements the cautionary tone regarding the vehicle's purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as a beautiful California 300D, praising its Champagne Metallic exterior over Palomino and suggesting that fixing necessary issues will lead to enjoyable ownership of this low-mileage car. @jjluce (The Seller) assures prospective buyers that the car runs and drives extremely well, confirming all major systems are operational, including the radio and power windows. @Smilinpat expresses excitement about the car, stating they might have seen it in town and appreciates its good representation in the listing.
Neutral: @halrod1 raises concerns about the vehicle's condition, noting visible sun damage and asking for information about whether certain recall issues were addressed. @Boulderman queries about needed repairs for the A/C and the operational state of the radio. Several users, including @Scottyb1961 and @Traxx72, request additional details such as close-up pictures of seals and clarification regarding tire sizes, creating an engaging dialogue about the car's specifics.
Negative: @geoffreyp points out discrepancies in the claimed mileage, referencing maintenance records that contradict the seller's assertion of only 50,000 miles, leading to skepticism. @Jonnycomelately expresses concern about the vehicle's age and potential issues with hoses and other parts despite its low mileage. @S123Driver supports @halrod1's assessment, suggesting the car likely has higher mileage based on the steering wheel's condition and their experience with similar models.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express their enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its unique design and functionality. @R6power notes that it would be a "hit" at Radwood events and suggest it would even pay for itself with the money saved on accommodations. @OutOfMyElement appreciates the clever design of the rear door, while @Capitaljdm emphasizes the camper’s compact size and full 4WD capability, which makes it suitable for city driving and outdoor adventures. The vehicle's practical features, such as the rear kitchen area and shower, also receive positive remarks, confirming its status as a standout option in the JDM camper market.
Neutral: Commenters have posed various questions that suggest a general curiosity about the details and usability of the camper. @JohnOKeefe inquires about the air conditioning system in the rear cabin, while @letthegypsyhaveit asks about the condition of the rear wheels and the timing belt. @Chase.paper questions whether the vehicle is manual, to which @Capitaljdm confirms the five-speed manual transmission. @1Cobra1 raises questions about camping comfortably in extreme temperatures without a generator or separate heating and cooling systems, indicating a need for clarity on the camper's off-grid capabilities.
Negative: Several concerns have been raised about the vehicle's condition and usability. @1Cobra1 asks why the shower house wasn't replaced, demonstrating doubt about the camper's maintenance. Additionally, @mattgreenbay questions whether any features do not work as intended. @AdminAmy brings up the potential issue of odors inside the camper, which can be a concern for prospective buyers. Overall, while the vehicle has attracted interest, some commenters are apprehensive about specific aspects that could impact their decision to purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @graysail finds the vehicle pretty spiffy, appreciating its overall appeal. @TedLitvin describes the driving experience favorably, enjoying features like the tire chirp on the shift and the V8 engine's performance, comparing it to his own vehicle. @jim53066 praises the classic design combined with modern driveline features, highlighting its capability to drive at highway speeds comfortably.
Neutral: @Potteraz (The Seller) offers detailed information about the vehicle, noting its previous garage storage and the absence of rust or leaks. They clarify that the fuel tank was replaced five years ago and provide specifics on the fueling and wiring upgrades. Responses to inquiries about the vehicle's gauges, wipers, and heater indicate a mix of original and upgraded features, with no original heater option available, and assurance about the vehicle's historical paint details.
Negative: @buddy318 raises concerns regarding discrepancies in the paint description, questioning whether the original colors were retained or if there's been significant repainting. @myconvertible asks about potential body misalignments noted in the photos, while @heartt44 expresses a concern about how well the windows seal when the roof is up, highlighting possible issues during adverse weather conditions.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the 1969 Charger R/T SE for its aesthetic appeal, particularly the attractive green color. @DanTheMan86 expresses admiration for the car, declaring it one of his favorites and the best looking year. @NMendez22 (The Seller) agrees, noting the color combo as sharp and appreciating the stripe delete feature, which several others, like @C3Lee and @weshudgins, compliment as well. @Valiantjim shares excitement about the car serving as a phenomenal time capsule, praising its condition, aftermarket AC, and the combination of colors, suggesting it's a well-regarded example of a classic Mopar.
Neutral: Multiple comments acknowledge the car's restoration and its features, with @NMendez22 (The Seller) confirming details like matching numbers and the original factory stripe delete. Commenters, including @hairyolds and @a990dna, mentioned specific aspects of the vehicle's design and functionality, like the color coordination and details about the dashboard. Some users, like @NoCarorMopar and @MoparSS, ask questions about the tachometer and the details regarding the interior and engine specifications, indicating an interest in the mechanical aspects of the car beyond its visual appeal.
Negative: On the darker side, some users, such as @MoparSS and @sharifi10, raise concerns about the vehicle's tachometer, suggesting it is misidentified in the listing and questioning its authenticity. @MoparSS also inquires about the engine and transmission's rebuild history, seeking clarity on the car's condition. The need for more detailed pictures is mentioned by @sharifi10, hinting at some dissatisfaction with the current presentation of the vehicle. @NoCarorMopar also critiques the photography quality, suggesting improvements would facilitate potential buyers' decisions.
|
 |
Positive: The comments praise the car's aesthetics, with @gregoryindiana describing it as beautiful and @emanrace expressing admiration for the gorgeous back end of the Carrera 4 GTS. Many commenters, including @Friarmike84, appreciate the seller's professionalism and the potential for the car to fetch a good price at auction. Furthermore, @BenzandBuick confirms the accuracy of the seller's representation by personally inspecting the vehicle and observing its good condition, including a cold start and operation of the soft top.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding the car's ownership history, particularly from @Icecreammatt, who questions the number of owners reported on Carfax. In response, ToddStormMountain (The Seller) defends the reliability of Carfax, stating the service records show the car had careful previous owners. Additionally, @Surplus1 requests clarification about the car's model year designation, showing a mix of curiosity and uncertainty about the vehicle's specification.
Negative: Some comments express dissatisfaction with the driving video's presentation, with @tomcolt3 noting the bumpy ride and @CaptChaos feeling it is too mild and underwhelming. @LegalBill openly criticizes those who question the video, suggesting a defensive tone regarding its quality. @RKR1 also queries the absence of an oil analysis, indicating concerns about the car's mechanical condition, while the mixed feedback hints at apprehensions from potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: The 1959 Chevrolet Corvette presented by @AutobarnCollection is highly regarded for its appealing features. @GreggC praises the fuel-injected badging and the first-year lockout shifter as standout elements, while noting the attractive appearance of the wide whitewalls on a Tuxedo Black body. @Fuelieguy also highlights the desirability of the black/red combination with 290 horsepower, commending the extensive maintenance provided by FI expert @jerrybramlett, which adds confidence in its performance. @jerrybramlett offers a one-year free labor warranty on the fuel injection system he has worked on, showing a commitment to supporting the buyer.
Neutral: Comments from potential buyers show interest in the vehicle's history and operational aspects. @gtjoey1314 expresses curiosity about confirming whether the car originally started life as a fuel-injected model, seeking to understand additional paperwork. @DG-Collections asks whether all gauges are functioning and raises concerns about the vehicle's overall condition, such as potential rust in the mufflers and the availability of a hardtop. @HCable inquires about the operational status of the speedometer and tachometer, indicating that buyers are looking for detailed knowledge about the vehicle before considering a bid on it.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's cosmetic condition are raised by users like @Bj123, who wishes for a clear presentation of imperfections, and mentions that not all details were addressed in the initial video. Some commenters, like @Fuelieguy, regret the lack of a factory hardtop, estimating the cost for a suitable replacement, which adds to the overall investment needed. @Bordeaux questions the engine's authenticity and completeness of identifying marks, citing possible concerns regarding modifications made during previous maintenance. These comments reflect anxieties potential buyers have about the vehicle's originality and overall value.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and its uniqueness as a collectible. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) highlights a commitment to transparency and seamless transactions, boasting high Google Reviews ratings. @SimplexFish later revised their initial concern regarding the intake color after confirming it was correct, reaffirming the car's overall beauty and wishing the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: Several inquiries are made about the vehicle's history and condition, including questions on the originality of the carpet color and the functioning of the radio/display system. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) responds to these queries, assuring potential buyers about the carpet's authentic look and that the radio is operational despite the screen's damage. Additional comments concern previous service records and concerns regarding maintenance, specifically referencing the clutch's condition and past repair history, which is acknowledged by the seller.
Negative: Some comments express concern about the maintenance records and issues such as a potentially damaged center screen and past repairs that may have been excessive. @Jaybird_57 observed that maintenance costs have surpassed the initial vehicle price over time. @ddama1 raised an issue about possible leaks, which @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) disputed, further emphasizing their confidence in the car's condition. @Fez also noted the potential for high maintenance costs associated with owning such a vehicle, reflecting a cautionary approach to its purchase.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous comments express enthusiasm for the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and condition, particularly highlighting the matte finish on the wood and the overall presentation. @Niteroi loves the matte trim, which is echoed by @gscharnagl who finds the color combination and design absolutely beautiful. @mbruce comments on the amazing looks of the car and shares excitement about the possibility of owning it, stating he would be all over it if he didn't already have one. Overall, the vehicle is described as stunning and close to perfect, with @MrMagoo2 stating he loves everything about it and is eager to come down and see it in person.
Neutral: The seller, @lloyddon1, provides comprehensive details about the vehicle's specifications and maintenance history, emphasizing their reputation as seasoned sellers with over 150 successful transactions on the platform. They also reassure potential bidders of their transparency and the vehicle's impressive condition. Questions asked by interested buyers include inquiries about specific features such as the functionality of factory options like the dynamic seats and the presence of an aftermarket tint on the windows. The seller responds positively to these questions, indicating that everything works as it should, confirming that they’re transparent about the car’s modifications and condition.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the vehicle's parts, such as whether the coil pack rails and plugs were replaced during the last service, and if the windows have aftermarket tinting. @PGT_FTW voices concerns about the maintenance schedule, while @BlackBeard questions the factory specifications for the window tints. @dayesue raises a point about the vehicle's Bluetooth capabilities, highlighting a limitation regarding audio streaming capabilities. These inquiries suggest a level of caution among potential buyers about the vehicle's complete condition and factory specifications, stemming from their past experiences and expectations.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the car's beauty and quality, with many praising its stunning appearance and color combination. @tturbo described it as a 'stunner,' and @Andrew_Leeson fondly recalled his own past ownership. @CaveDweller and @1959alfa also expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its marvelous characteristics and distinctive color. @AutoPazzo echoed the positive sentiments regarding the classic design, emphasizing its simple yet classy appeal. Seller @Hhurst assured potential buyers about the car's excellent restoration work, in response to queries about the restoration process and vehicle functionality.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions regarding specific features of the car, such as the steering wheel and braking systems. @Bartman0 raised a question about the similarities of the steering wheel with another Alfa model, while @Wsby shared personal insights from their inspection experience, noting that although the car had some cosmetic flaws, it was presented well. @KJLaBry pointed out a potential inconsistency regarding the vehicle's model year, prompting further inquiry into the technical specifications. Overall, these comments reflect a balanced interest in learning more about the vehicle without veering into overwhelming negativity or pure praise.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the vehicle's value relative to the restoration costs. @ShineOn humorously questioned the high restoration expenses while partaking in playful speculation. Similarly, @MY430 expressed doubt about the short ownership period and conveyed skepticism about the seller's motives, hinting at a lack of transparency. @Watry described certain features as possibly underwhelming compared to the competition, reiterating a cautious perspective. Some commenters, including @isolovers, faced criticism for potentially non-constructive comments, indicating a few discussions had turned somewhat negative.
|
2006 Ford F-250 Super Duty Lariat Crew Cab Power Stroke 4×4 FX4
1FTSW21P86ED43598
Lot 226562
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Gmmuscleusa described the truck as a brute, comparing its performance favorably to newer diesel models, mentioning that it has a significantly bigger turbo and great sound. The comments highlight the overall beauty of the truck, with @fullmeister calling it a beautiful truck and several others expressing admiration for its build and design. Additionally, @SLSBLACK (The Seller) provided helpful videos and pictures to showcase the truck, further enhancing its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: @SLSBLACK (The Seller) clarified some details about the truck, such as the front suspension being four link while the rear uses leaf springs, which addressed @emcenerney's concern about the listing details. Comments also included inquiries about modifications, including the EGR delete process and head bolt replacements. Buyers requested more information about the condition of specific parts, such as the bed and frame rails, and @SLSBLACK provided thorough explanations and documentation related to repairs and maintenance.
Negative: Several comments raised concerns regarding the truck's emissions compliance, particularly @gjr9er asked if the modifications would pass California smog, to which @SLSBLACK responded negatively. @William512 and @KirkTr both inquired about the check engine light, with @SLSBLACK attributing it to the EGR delete. Additionally, @Dozer281 pointed out potential damage in the bed which @SLSBLACK denied, stating it was just a minor deformation of the bed liner, which might confuse prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters see potential in the 1988 Mercedes Benz 560 SEL, with @Oilman noting that there is value for the right buyer who is willing to invest in maintaining the vehicle. @UncleScrooge69 (The Seller) emphasizes that the car has undergone significant mechanical work and can still prove to be a rewarding project with the right expertise. Overall, the feedback hints at the car being a good option for someone looking for a vintage model, provided they have the skills to restore it.
Neutral: Commenters have asked various questions about the condition of the vehicle, showing a curiosity about its maintenance history and overall state. @gnash300 inquires about potential cracks in the dashboard and trunk rust, while @Nefauto90280 seeks clarification on a transmission leak. @Mario007 is interested in the timeliness of the listed pictures and requests additional video evidence of the vehicle's condition, indicating a cautious yet engaged perspective on the auction.
Negative: Several comments raise concerns about the car's overall care and maintenance, pointing to signs of neglect. For instance, @RMcarperson mentions duct tape residue on the trunk lid, suggesting that the vehicle has not been properly cared for. @Oilman also comments on the deferred maintenance issues, indicating problems with water intrusion and potential rust. Furthermore, @gnash300 expresses concerns about body filler, potential damage, and overall trust issues regarding the vehicle's history, emphasizing a more negative viewpoint on its condition.
|
 |
Positive: @yjBen described the vehicle as a 'beaut,' appreciating its visual appeal. @Thatitrguy complimented the classic Jeep for retaining its authenticity, stating it feels usable, tasteful, and timeless. The seller, @NaplesLuxuryCars, emphasized the positive aspects of the community and mentioned that this Jeep is one of the nicest they've ever seen in person, noting the stunning paint and condition along with the attention it garners on the road.
Neutral: @SMAC01 asked whether all gauges work and mentioned a desire for video content, to which @NaplesLuxuryCars confirmed all gauges are functional but noted the radio lacks speakers. There was discussion about the gas filler location and modifications, with @voodoojeep pointing out the unique placement of the gas filler and commenting on the challenges posed by the roll bar for rear seat access.
Negative: @EngineCo345 raised a concern about the hood not closing properly, which @NaplesLuxuryCars addressed by clarifying that it was an adjustment issue. @RaoulDuke criticized the absence of doors and a roof, implying the vehicle is not a complete frame-off restoration. Additionally, @S188 requested a driving video to better understand the performance of the vehicle, hinting at some doubts regarding its capabilities.
|
 |
Positive: @zdoctor praised the car for being a nice example with the right mileage and mentioned its overall great shape, noting that such cars are getting harder to find. @Caddysmack also commented on the vehicle, calling it a clean 280ZX. @Woolleybear (The Seller) described owning the car for a short time and highlighted the good condition of the paint, stating that it had been well cared for by the previous owner since it was painted in 2007. @Woolleybear (The Seller) also mentioned the Sony radio in the glovebox works superbly, along with new speakers that provide better sound than the original. Overall, the feedback indicates that the car is viewed positively in terms of aesthetics and modifications made by previous owners.
Neutral: Many comments sought clarification about various features of the car. @sutekh inquired about the modifications involving the Sony radio and whether the stock radio had been disabled. @gabagool asked why the vehicle was being relisted after three months, which raised questions on its ownership history. @JaTJaM and @dgeorge79 pointed out the bouncing speedometer issue, with @dgeorge79 suggesting that it is a typical problem that could be fixed with cable lubrication. @mark38017 asked about the condition of the air conditioning system, while @CPEZ28 inquired about the vehicle’s ability to pass a California smog test, indicating a need for further information before making a decision.
Negative: Although the overall tone was positive, certain comments raised concerns. @rseamands questioned the quick turnaround on selling the car, implying potential issues with its purchase. @thunderchicken made a sarcastic remark about the vehicle's appeal, which may reflect a more critical view. @Zend noted the dash covering, expressing a preference for a different aesthetic solution, which suggests discontent with the current state. @Woolleybear (The Seller) himself acknowledged that he has not tested the air conditioning and indicated that there could be a leak or a problem with the pump, which could deter potential buyers. Overall, these comments highlight some uncertainties related to the vehicle's condition and modifications.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the impressive condition and rarity of the vehicle. @AdamY emphasizes that the vehicle is a stunning 47-year-old car that has survived well due to careful maintenance, while @tarias4556 describes it as absolutely gorgeous and compares it favorably to other luxury models. The functionality of the vehicle is also praised; @choicedealsnc2017 reported that all power equipment works properly, which contributes positively to the car's appeal. Additionally, @Noisyboyz appreciates the robustness of the Ford 9” rear end, underscoring the vehicle's reliability.
Neutral: Some comments provide a more balanced view, focusing on the vehicle's origins and specifications. @Gary_T1 notes the comparison to luxury brands and questions why the Versailles does not receive the same acclaim despite similar attributes. Another user, @Pfeil, discusses the differences in design and comfort compared to other vehicles in the same class, while @NStevenGray clarifies details about the wheelbase shared between the Versailles and the Ford Granada. This dialogue around the car's heritage and technical aspects aims to provide context without leaning strongly either way.
Negative: On the negative side, there are comments that suggest skepticism regarding the car's value and heritage. @stugottz and @CDehne share anecdotes of scavenging parts from junked vehicles, implying that despite the car's glamor, there may be significant challenges associated with its maintenance and repairs. @BeaverIslandJJ inquires about the car's power equipment, suggesting a concern about its reliability over time. Finally, @flyingdago expresses frustration in trying to contact the seller, indicating potential issues with communication that could deter interested buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the aesthetic appeal and solid performance of the G320, with users like @littlehandegan and @bpeverest expressing admiration for its appearance and design features. The seller, @CascadeOverlandImports, emphasizes the vehicle's excellent driving condition and overall maintenance history, which includes being regularly serviced at a Mercedes dealer. Enthusiasts appreciate its distinct style compared to more modern iterations, with @JakeTheSnake115 calling it 'epic' and the 'antithesis of the modern G Wagon', while others remark on its clean example and the luxurious yet spartan feel it presents.
Neutral: Several inquiries are made regarding technical specifications and features, illustrating a balanced interest in both its aesthetics and practical usability, such as seating arrangements and emissions compliance. Commenters like @bengas and @envypete raise relevant questions about rear seat legality and potential modifications necessary for different states, indicating that prospective buyers are considering their practical use for the vehicle rather than simply its looks. The seller provides thorough responses to these queries, reassuring potential buyers about the vehicle's condition and compliance with regulations.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive reception, some comments express concern about practical aspects, particularly regarding emissions compliance, as noted by @edenjet and @Chop69. @Chop69 also seeks clarification about potential issues with inspections and the vehicle's title situation in Oregon versus Montana. Additionally, the notion that parts or features may not be fully accommodating for all users, such as not being able to fit 33-inch tires under the spare tire cover mentioned by @wiggleattack, also adds a touch of caution for interested buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @DanTheMan86 expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting it is the final year and supercharged, which he finds very appealing. @DUGEEEFRESH04 called it a 'MOPAR unicorn holy grail,' indicating a high level of admiration for the vehicle's rarity and desirability. Additionally, @pwrhouss mentioned the performance upgrades the car has received, stating the Procharger increases horsepower significantly, making it a thrilling ride that delivers power effortlessly. The seller also highlighted the car's immaculate condition, detailing its well-maintained history and the fun driving experience it provides.
Neutral: @bogietrey3 inquired about the horsepower of the vehicle, showing an interest in its performance metrics. @ilintner asked whether the vehicle has the stock struts and springs in its suspension setup, suggesting a focus on the vehicle's handling characteristics. The seller provided comprehensive information about the car's features and specifications, as well as insights into prior upgrades and maintenance, indicating the importance of transparency in selling a vehicle.
Negative: There weren't any overtly negative comments about the vehicle, but @Robert8198 prompted @pwrhouss for more information regarding upgrades made to support the supercharger addition, hinting at potential concerns over modifications that might impact reliability or performance. @ilintner's remark about a high sitting position and querying about the struts suggests some uncertainty about the vehicle's stability or suspension integrity. Lastly, the seller's need to sell the vehicle stems from personal circumstances, implying a possibility that it may not be a priority for him anymore.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed nostalgia and fond memories associated with the bike, highlighting its reliability and enjoyable riding experience. @BigT77 called it a 'cool little R/D low mile two stroke' which is perfect for purposes like mosquito abatement. @Blizzard340 praised its reliability while riding alongside friends on vintage models, emphasizing that it will retain its value. @GLWA,CTTEXAS reminisced about owning the same bike as a child, recounting thrilling adventures on it and commending its performance on hills with its two-speed transmission. This positive sentiment indicates that the bike has left a mark on many who have ridden it in the past.
Neutral: Several comments were neutral, seeking clarification or offering minor suggestions without strong emotions. @LarrySturm inquired about a possible dent on the gas tank, showing concern about the bike's condition. @Steveo888 (The Seller) responded to the dent inquiry directly, stating that there was no dent, suggesting transparency in communication from the seller. @venebright also noted the bike's aesthetic appeal but pointed out a potential issue with the idle, asking for a video to better assess the engine's operation, showing awareness of mechanical concerns without a definitive judgment on quality.
Negative: Negative comments primarily focused on mechanical concerns brought up by potential buyers. @bmasho suggested turning down the idle on the carburetor, indicating that it might not be set correctly. Similarly, @venebright pointed out that the idle sounded too high in the video, implying there might be a problem with how it is running. These comments suggest that while there is a lot of affection for the bike, there are crucial functional issues that need to be addressed to ensure optimal performance.
|
 |
Positive: @neverbenbetter (The Seller) expressed excitement for the no reserve auction on the low mileage CR-V and made himself available for questions. Commenters praised the vehicle's condition, with @DatsunZGuy noting its tidy undercarriage despite being used in Michigan, and @letthegypsyhaveit highlighting its amazing rust-free condition. @mrpotty remarked on the K24 engine's reliability, which adds to the positive sentiment surrounding the car, with many feeling nostalgic, like @Datcrvismine, who grew up with a similar vehicle and felt a strong connection to it.
Neutral: Various commenters questioned features and additional details about the vehicle. @mrpotty inquired about the AC performance, potential smoking issues, and the condition of fluids and brakes. @bigbicep24 asked for verification on the number of keys and the temperature gauge for the AC and heat. @lass_sayin sought shipping information, and @62chryslernewport questioned the timing belt status, to which @DatsunZGuy clarified that the K24 engines utilize timing chains instead.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns regarding the vehicle's history and condition. @sir_keith noted the use of salt on Utah roads, even questioning the claim of the CR-V being rust-free given its time spent in Michigan. Additionally, the mixed feelings about the vehicle's price during the auction were evident, with @mrpotty wondering about the final bid amount and contemplating his budget. Overall, while there were questions and some doubt about aspects of the CR-V, the prevalent mood remained positive.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its fun and stylish design, calling it sharp and complimenting its artistic, tasteful interior. @mick59 referred to the modifications as superb, and @RedRon acknowledged the car's impressive appearance inside and out. @stugottz expressed admiration for the upgrades, while @SteveinVT affirmed that it is a seriously cool 914. Users like @joetravis appreciated the high-quality photography, and @jpfindlay reflected a change in perspective, expressing that they could happily accept this well-done build instead of an original version of a 914.
Neutral: There were some inquiries about specific features of the car, such as the oil cooler and the identity of the transmission. User @S_Cruz and @mbhawaii sought clarification on the oil cooler's location and the stripe details, respectively, while @skid22 requested clarification on invoices that appeared to be quotes. The seller, @911r, addressed these questions and provided additional information about the engine and modifications, ensuring that potential buyers had the necessary details.
Negative: However, not all comments were purely positive. Some users raised concerns about certain visual details, like the dash fabric being loose as pointed out by @haveatrailer2, and the potential diminishment of the passenger legroom due to a subwoofer box replacement detailed by @joe180 and @GGoose. Additionally, @truthseeker noted an unsightly dent in the gas tank, suggesting it should have been fixed in a build of this level, indicating some missed opportunities in an otherwise high-quality restoration.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed a general admiration for the Volkswagen Phaeton, highlighting its unique blend of luxury and performance. @Busterdog60 praised the car's super-sedan qualities, mentioning how it rides comfortably as if one were in a private jet, while @sludgo noted its understated elegance as being appealing. Additionally, @Lkstk referred to it as an underappreciated masterpiece, emphasizing the exceptional craftsmanship with details like the trunk hinges, demonstrating the level of attention and engineering that went into its production. The luxurious features and comfortable driving experience garnered significant appreciation from various enthusiasts.
Neutral: Some comments reflected on the reality of owning such a vehicle without strong emotional attachment. @burn3b inquired about the functionality of the vehicle and any current issues, such as oil leaks, indicating a practical concern for potential buyers. Additionally, @jpr made a humorous remark regarding the engineering decisions behind the vehicle's design, comparing it to the combination of VW and Bentley, revealing a mix of curiosity and light sarcasm. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) communicated openly about the auction process and transparency, demonstrating a business-like approach to the sale, while also inviting questions from potential buyers about the car's condition and history.
Negative: Conversely, there were some notable critiques regarding the vehicle's maintenance issues and parts availability. @jradcliffe warned about common problems with the overhead control panel, which tends to wrinkle over time, a condition that reflects the vehicle's potential for aging issues that could deter some buyers. @djloans pointed out the poor condition of the panel following a request for photos, suggesting a lack of durability that could lead to expensive repairs. Furthermore, comments from @Norge991T and @jradcliffe discussed the difficulties in sourcing replacement parts, indicating a potentially frustrating ownership experience for those interested in maintaining the vehicle in optimum condition.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments express enthusiasm for the 2023 Ford Bronco Raptor, with @Todd_Z. liking the matched body color fender flares on this particular vehicle. @Kidsixpack reminisces positively about their previous ownership of a similar model, appreciating the convenience of dealer recall repairs. @ErikSOlsen confirms the vehicle's excellent condition, stating it looks brand new and encourages potential buyers to consider it. Additionally, @golden77 compliments the vehicle's appearance, highlighting its aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @popslovescars, provides detailed information about the vehicle, noting that the original warranty will expire in two months and clarifying that it has never been off-road. @onebadrover inquires about the vehicle's warranty and recalls, and the seller reassures the buyer that the rear view camera functions properly. They also mention the reasons for certain modifications and the options chosen for the vehicle regarding the interior and seat materials. @timmytomtom and @chetsle discuss the absence of power seats due to the washout interior, and the seller confirms the inclusion of two working keys.
Negative: Some concerns are raised regarding the vehicle's recalls and potential issues. @onebadrover questions why the seatbelt and camera recalls weren't addressed during the last service, and @timmytomtom asks if there are any unusual noises while driving, indicating a need for reassurance about the vehicle's performance. @Damaho912's comment about needing eye protection around the fender flares suggests there might be a concern regarding the aesthetic or functional safety of the modifications.
|
5k-Mile 2013 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Coupe Hennessey HPE750 6-Speed
2G1FZ1EP8D9807253
Lot 226577
Dealer
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle, highlighting its impressive performance and aesthetic appeal. @t5irocz remarked on how the car sounds "insanely good" in the video, while @CJIIIFS noted that the car appears "wicked fast" and praised its aggressive design. @JMAbacus1 contributed by mentioning that it is a "very nice example" and considered it a great value, indicating satisfaction with its reliability. @zl1henney deemed the price as a steal for this car and expressed confidence that it won’t stay at that price for long, further reinforcing the positive sentiment.
Neutral: There were some neutral comments where potential buyers sought further information about the vehicle. @daddydmm asked about its compliance with 50 state emissions regulations, indicating a concern for its legality and functionality. @pchludil expressed a desire to know about the number of owners and details concerning the HPE package, questioning whether it was installed during or after the original purchase. @choicedealsnc2017 (The Seller) provided clarification that the HPE package was installed in September 2013 and that the HPE "hockey sticks" are decals available for purchase.
Negative: On the negative side, @JMAbacus1 pointed out that maintaining older models like this one could lead to costly repairs, sharing his own experience of spending substantial amounts on replacement parts. He noted that while it is generally reliable, the potential high cost of maintenance items might deter some buyers. Additionally, there was a safety recall mentioned, highlighting concerns over the vehicle's ignition key possibly causing a loss of power, which raises questions about the vehicle's long-term safety and reliability for potential purchasers.
|
 |
Positive: @mugskillet loves their 07SC Honda Element, stating that it has 160K miles with no issues and expresses a clear affection for the car. @rmwcali highlights the versatility of the Honda Element, emphasizing its reliability, spaciousness, and recent dealer maintenance, including an oil change. The upgrades for wheelchair use are regarded as valuable, with the car being termed as an incredible opportunity for a one-owner, low mileage vehicle that can also serve as a work van or cargo van.
Neutral: Comments reveal a range of inquiries and specifics about the wheelchair features. @qmark raises questions about the comfort of fitting a wheelchair behind the driver's seat, while @MDsuave13 seeks clarification on the ramp's motorization and overall operation. @rmwcali confirms that the vehicle includes a motorized ramp but notes some confusion about its operation, indicating the need for further checks and potential repairs in the system in a reassuring manner.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the functionality of the wheelchair ramp and fob system, with @MDsuave13 expressing skepticism about how a person in a wheelchair could effectively operate the equipment based on the seller's comments. @rmwcali admits uncertainty regarding the full functionality of the motorized ramp since only the button inside the car is confirmed to work. Additionally, they mention that the fob needs to be repaired or replaced as it did not respond even after a battery change, indicating potential limitations in the vehicle's accessibility features.
|
 |
Positive: @Jperell praises the vehicle as a nicely sorted and pretty driver, emphasizing the respect it deserves. @Rweiss6 describes the car as great looking and recently restored by someone who clearly loved it. They express their own satisfaction owning a similar model, highlighting the ease of maintenance and availability of parts, wishing luck to the next owner who will surely be happy with their purchase.
Neutral: @morganplus8 asks about the inclusion of the top and side curtains and assumes the vehicle runs and drives, suggesting that a video of it in operation would be helpful. @brakeservo questions the terminology regarding the cylinder liners, seeking clarity about whether the block had been sleeved, which indicates an interest in the vehicle's specifics. @Petrolholic notes that the listing may have been mistakenly placed under the Crosley category.
Negative: @smitty122 expresses concern over unanswered questions and mentions that the dealer seems to be missing in action. @wayryKdad, the seller, acknowledges the delay in responding due to a family matter, committing to post a driving video of the car soon. This gap in communication may contribute to potential buyers' uncertainty.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is introduced by @greenerdays11, who expresses excitement over offering the 2002 BMW 330Ci, highlighting its well-chosen Titanium Silver color, Grey Leather Interior, and Black Convertible top. The car is described as an exceptional example and the seller emphasizes a desire to provide additional details and videos to prospective buyers. Commenters, such as @Lochinvarski, compliment the car's beauty and inquire about the originality of the paint, which @greenerdays11 confirms, enhancing overall positive perception of the vehicle.
Neutral: Comments from @TXDesFox include inquiries about the tires needing replacement and the necessity of maintenance to ensure the car is a reliable daily driver, as it approaches the 60,000-mile mark. @greenerdays11 responds with assurance that maintenance is being monitored closely, detailing recent oil changes and indicating that further services may be needed in the near future. Overall, there is a constructive dialogue surrounding the vehicle's upkeep and potential requirements, suggesting a reasonable approach to car ownership.
Negative: Concerns have been raised by various commenters regarding potential issues with the vehicle. @MdistelBMW mentions the check engine light being on and suggests that the cooling system might need replacement if it is still original. @TXDesFox further comments on potential recalls and asks whether they can be resolved before delivery, indicating a sense of caution around the vehicle's condition. @f2motors also queries the specifics of the service engine soon light and associated trouble codes, suggesting there may be underlying mechanical issues that prospective buyers should be aware of.
|
One-Family-Owned, 350-Powered 1973 Chevrolet Nova Custom Hatchback
1Y17F3L165052
Lot 226581
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commenters express a strong appreciation for the car's nostalgic value and classic design. @TorqueChap highlights the interesting story behind the car, suggesting it embodies a unique legacy, while @C3Lee shares fond memories from owning a similar model, emphasizing its speed and styling. @LSU2020 and @borninthe60s celebrate the Chevy Nova's charm, and @TexWatson points out its potential for bonding with family members through car maintenance, reflecting on the car's practicality and ease of modification.
Neutral: Several comments provide practical insights and suggestions regarding the car's condition and potential modifications. @C3Lee raises concerns about rust issues related to the unibody design but mentions that parts are readily available for restoration. @speedster356 reminisces about personal experiences with the car, focusing on the modifications popular in their youth. @dugan4540 shares similar memories about the car's interior, while @GregB73 (The Seller) promises to upload videos for potential buyers and engages with commenters to foster a community spirit around the sale.
Negative: Some comments express reservations about specific aspects of the vehicle. @C3Lee notes concerns regarding the trim and paint, indicating a lack of clarity on the car's specifications. @mnswisher64 mentions a personal preference for the original 307 engine, hinting at a possible downside for those who favor the original specifications over modifications. Additionally, @rustyray humorously questions how many speeding tickets he might incur while driving the car, suggesting potential issues with its performance or driving experience.
|
 |
Positive: @Blizzard340 praises the bike as a beautiful vintage model ready for a revival on the racing scene. @Pettyfan43 finds inspiration in the bike's appearance, recalling fond memories of riding in the 70s and wishing the seller luck with the bike. @LandSpeedster expresses admiration, highlighting the bike's beauty, and @BigT77 sees it as a ready and eager machine for racing and trail riding. @ChiliJR and @Tom1200 additionally commend the craftsmanship, with Tom noting the attractive X model forks.
Neutral: @Slinkert shares an observation about Yamaha's design experimentation with front forks during the MX bike's era, indicating a thoughtful appreciation for the history behind the bike's design. @fomocoguy highlights a nostalgic connection to the scents associated with classic bikes, specifically referencing Castrol oil, reflecting on the culture surrounding vintage motorcycles.
Negative: No negative comments were found in the summarized comments, as all remarks lean towards appreciation and nostalgia for the bike and its era.
|
 |
Positive: @Ghosty positively highlights the gorgeous appearance of the 718, noting its high-spec interior and features like the front axle lift. @NOTAFANOFTHEMINIVAN appreciates the driving experience of the vehicle, comparing it favorably to a 911 GT car while enjoying the manual top feature. @Splitwindowvw describes the car's intoxicating sound and expresses a strong attachment, indicating it's a tough decision to part with such a great vehicle.
Neutral: Several users discuss the details of the car's appearance and features, including @mcwop23 who inquires about the wheels, while @theflyingtaco and @Mwar99 evaluate the paint protection film (PPF) applied to the vehicle. The seller, @SidB, responds to inquiries about the wrap, asserting that there have been no imperfections and shares information about the professional work done on the wheels and PPF. @Best_Of_Show mentions he believes this car will appreciate over time, adding context about its production and market value.
Negative: Concerns regarding the color wrap are prominent among the comments, as @jamie140 suggests removing it before selling. @Sdorish raises doubts about how the wrap might impact bids, suggesting potential risks given the number of similar vehicles on sale. @BaTuser3 claims the car looks significantly better without the wrap, indicating a preference for the vehicle's original finish.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as a 'yummy Yuma C10', implying it has an appealing build. @JLsKA510 calls it a 'sweet rig', suggesting that it stands out and is well-crafted. @Huckleberry_1 praises the craftsmanship with 'Wow Beautiful job!', indicating that the quality of work has received appreciation.
Neutral comments include inquiries about specific features and modifications. @69_Mopar asks whether it is a long bed or short bed, receiving clarification from @rmiranda72, the seller, who confirms the truck originally came as a long bed before being converted to a short bed. @TB5224 shows curiosity about the engine origin and technical specifications, seeking details that the seller agrees to provide. @Ansfarms also engages with the seller, asking about the paint color and hubcap specifications, to which @rmiranda72 responds with the relevant information, creating a collaborative atmosphere in the conversation.
Negative comments focus on concerns regarding the vehicle's original features. @tjarney points out that the gas tank remains behind the seat despite the extensive work done on the truck, while @TB5224's questions about the engine numbers suggest a need for more thorough documentation or clarification. Overall, while showcasing interest and engagement, the comments reflect some skepticism regarding the original design choices and modifications made to the vehicle.
Neutral: @69_Mopar inquires about the truck's bed length, prompting @rmiranda72, the seller, to clarify that this truck was retrofitted from a long bed to a short bed. Additionally, @TB5224 asks about the engine's origin and its specifications, which @rmiranda72 confirms to be from a 1968 Malibu with some updates made. @Ansfarms seeks information about the paint color and specifications regarding the wheels, and the seller provides comprehensive answers, contributing to an informative exchange about the vehicle.
Negative: @tjarney raises a concern that despite the truck's renovations, the gas tank remains located behind the seat, which could be seen as a drawback in terms of functionality and modernization. Furthermore, @TB5224's persistent inquiries about the engine numbers suggest that there may be a lack of complete documentation or clarity on the vehicle's modifications, reflecting a potential dissatisfaction with how certain aspects of the truck have been handled.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the Challenger, with rmb138 highlighting its connection to the classic film 'Vanishing Point.' Blimpie, who also owns a 2019 Challenger, echoed this sentiment, reinforcing the cultural significance of the vehicle. Several participants praised the car's performance and handling, with jh3384kksds noting that the Scat Pack deserves more credit for its superior handling compared to the R/T models. The overall consensus among fans is that the car is a true modern muscle car that delivers exceptional value for the money, especially when compared to more expensive classic options.
Neutral: The seller, p1_motorcars_ltd, provided detailed information about the auction and the vehicle's history, explaining that it has been well-maintained and is in stellar condition. They emphasized the car's performance attributes, describing it as a capable tire burner with a blend of muscle and modern features. There were logistical details from the seller regarding freight options and financing for potential buyers, catering to a wider audience including Canadian customers. They posted updates about videos being uploaded, which contributed to keeping interested buyers informed and engaged.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about specific aspects of the vehicle's history or sales process. Mustangfan007 raised a question regarding the car's ability to pass California smog tests, highlighting the importance of this issue for potential bidders in the region. Although the seller assured that all necessary smog equipment is intact and that they guarantee compliance, the mention of smog regulations suggests that the car's performance in this area may be a concern for some potential buyers. Other commenters expressed minor frustrations regarding vehicle maintenance or compatibility with personal preferences, emphasizing that while the Challenger is admired, it may also come with apprehensions for some.
|
 |
Positive: @lowellperry expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, stating that it was "DRIVEN" and expressing love for it. @MattyGatch noted that it is a single owner car and described it as very nice. @wutang976 commented on the vehicle's clean appearance despite having 77,000 miles, and @Pandacar admired the driving habits of the previous owner, suggesting that someone even bid an extra $1000 because of their appreciation for how it was driven. @dsands3 praised the beautiful color combination of the vehicle and requested videos of a cold start and top operation. @Ddamewood (The Seller) seems to convey a positive overall experience with the vehicle's history with his anecdotes about his beloved dog.
Neutral: @kubist referred to the vehicle with the name "Desert Dog." @klawlor questioned the details surrounding the damage shown in pictures 31 and 32, indicating concern without negativity. @TristanvG inquired about whether the dog frequently rode in the car and if there are any odors, showing a neutral curiosity about the condition of the vehicle. @Kylebleiman asked about the estimated cost to fix the existing scratches, which indicates an evaluation of the car rather than a clear judgment on its quality. Lastly, @Weigeman simply asked how many keys come with the vehicle, reflecting another neutral inquiry.
Negative: @Ddamewood (The Seller) addressed the damage by explaining that it was caused by his dog Lily, whom he admitted was a "pitbull mix named Lily, probably the worst dog in the history of the world." This comment somewhat detracts from the vehicle's appeal. Additionally, @kcolrut1950 raised a concern about the bidding process, explaining the complexities of reserve prices and additional charges, suggesting that potential buyers should be wary of the final costs associated with the bid. This indicates a cautionary stance towards the purchasing process.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle, noting its beauty and racing history. @bialy1969 describes it as beautiful and shares excitement over the car's arrival at the auction. @cwood13 considers it a solid start for a vintage race car and praises its photographic presentation. Multiple commenters highlight the car's aesthetics, with @Watry mentioning the original glovebox and how fantastic the car looks in its current condition. @Wob (The Seller) reiterates the car's charm and appeal, stating that it's adorable and was a great purchase. He shares enthusiasm for the upgrades completed on the vehicle, revealing a thorough inspection and maintenance process that brought the car back to life.
Neutral: A number of comments seek clarification on the car's specifications and whether it meets the requirements for various racing classes. @69Alfa1750 asks for details about the engine build and racing components, while @Sblack inquires about compression tests performed on the engine. @ThePhysicist questions the street legality of the car, which @Wob confirms is not street legal due to its racing modifications. Many commenters appear to be knowledgeable about racing regulations, discussing the appropriateness of the car within different classes, such as Improved Touring.
Negative: There are some concerns raised regarding the car's current racing status and potential modifications needed. @cwood13 mentions that while it is a good start for a racer, it may fall short on cosmetic details compared to ideal standards for race cars. Additionally, commenters including @ThePhysicist point out lack of compression testing and tuning requirements, raising questions about the car's readiness for immediate racing as it stands. Issues about the fit of doors and overall alignment are hinted, indicating that while the car is commendable, there are areas that might require attention or adjustment.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the 2004 Dodge Ram SRT-10 as a remarkable and coveted vehicle. @natew51 enthusiastically describes it as a 'KILLER' truck that showcases the excitement of RAM's new street truck. @DanTheMan86 shares his personal experience of owning a similar model since 2018, expressing that it's worth every penny and believing it to be the coolest truck ever. Other owners, like @MAX413 and @Amen250gt, emphasize the truck's fun driving experience and hint at its impressive V10 engine. Additionally, @Farrelsmith and @BryceBalthaser reveal their admiration for the truck's condition and the professionalism of the seller, reinforcing a positive view of the vehicle and the buying process.
Neutral: Several comments provide factual insights and history regarding the vehicle. @nexusautobrokers, the seller, expresses excitement over bringing this one-owner Viper truck to the market, suggesting that it feels like a trip back to 2004. Some comments delve into technical details about the truck's specifications, such as its manual transmission and unique features. @Button and @BadAzp remark on the nostalgia of owning a V10 pickup, pointing to a time when these kinds of vehicles represented automotive prowess.
Negative: While the overall tone is positive, a couple of comments hint at potential downsides. @MAX413 humorously notes the vehicle's fuel consumption with 'loves gas,' alluding to the practical considerations of owning such a powerful truck. There were no explicitly negative critiques about the truck but rather playful jabs at the expense of practicality in owning a performance-oriented vehicle. Additionally, @69Daytona recalls the lengthy dealership experience during his purchase, suggesting that while the truck is enjoyable, the buying process can be time-consuming if not well-managed.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its exceptional condition and unique features. @beardedelephant praises how well it has maintained its appearance after many miles, noting that the touchpoints inside are in remarkably good shape. @2014LTDLTZ considers it a great candidate for upgrades with modern powertrains, suggesting customization possibilities that could enhance its performance. Additionally, @LongDucDong appreciates the understated yet classy look of the car, stating it has an appealing presence.
Neutral: Some commenters express a mix of nostalgia and curiosity regarding the vehicle's design and features. @braktrcr shares a personal opinion about the design looking reminiscent of a modern Nash while admitting to liking it more now than in its original time. @asilver33 reflects on the joy of driving a similar model while noting some last-minute refurbishing issues, highlighting the unique driving experience offered by this type of vehicle. Questions about specific features, like the stereo system and dash layout, also arise, which indicates varying levels of interest and concern.
Negative: However, there are also concerns regarding specific aspects of the car, particularly about aftermarket modifications. @96bliss voices unease about the exhaust system, questioning its compliance with emission laws. @gauldingr further points out the need to eliminate the dealer doc fee, as it could deter potential buyers from engaging in the auction. These criticisms reveal some hesitancy among potential buyers and a desire for transparency and adherence to regulations.
|
 |
Positive: @johnnyb11 mentioned that the car looks great nose to tail, which reflects positively on its overall condition. Additionally, @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) noted that the vehicle runs and drives well, with no leaks and a dry showroom floor. The seller highlighted that the engine is strong and the transmission shifts smoothly, suggesting a reliable driving experience for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments indicate a need for clarification regarding the vehicle's service history and specifications. @meporsche requested a condensed service history to better understand what has been done, while @parallax_ca and @dahli pointed out the unclear records from pre-2000s, and the engine's discrepancies in labeling. @holmes929 and @haringmp both inquired about certain features of the vehicle, such as the metal plate and the cut pipes near the exhaust, which points to a discussion around its technical details rather than overall performance.
Negative: On the negative side, there were concerns regarding the documentation and potential maintenance needs. @MHogue asked about major services, indicating uncertainty about the vehicle's upkeep. @dahli mentioned the need for clarity on the engine designation, and @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) admitted to the difficulty in obtaining additional service records from prior owners, suggesting a lack of transparency that could deter potential buyers. Furthermore, the suggestion that a timing belt service may be due adds to the apprehension.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's condition and aesthetics. @nickyee commented on the car's cleanliness, while @IMissMySaab praised it as one of their favorite WRX body styles. @greystone noted the impressive lack of rust, which resonated with those familiar with Subaru vehicles in harsh climates. @ToyTech14 (The Seller) shared positive insights about the car, claiming it drives well and has no error lights, further boosting its appeal. Several users, including @dalba4, highlighted the value of the car, mentioning its potential longevity if well maintained.
Neutral: There were several inquiries about the car's service history and mechanical condition, indicating an interest in the vehicle's upkeep beyond its aesthetics. @ejl and @choco1988 asked about specific maintenance tasks, such as the timing service and the status of the transmission replacement. @ToyTech14 (The Seller) addressed these concerns by confirming recent services and providing details about ownership history. Additionally, the need for documentation regarding repairs was highlighted by users like @Jaydobs and @heeltoes, showing a balanced interest in both the car's history and its current performance.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's maintenance and parts history. @biodtl expressed hesitation over the frequency of transmission replacements and clutches within a short mileage span, prompting questions about modifications and condition prior to sale. @heeltoes echoed these concerns, emphasizing that while the car is not on its original timing belt, it is due for another replacement soon. Additionally, @choco1988 insinuated there might be a crack in the headlight housing, which was refuted by @ToyTech14 (The Seller) after inspection, indicating some skepticism among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @JHBBII noted the stunning features of the 2002 Porsche 911 Turbo Coupe, particularly admiring the Arctic Silver Metallic paint, wheels, and body kit, expressing overall excitement about the car. @CarNutMiami shared a positive experience, stating it is an excellent vehicle with a fantastic transmission, reinforcing the car's appeal. @savethewheelsplz added to the positive sentiment, calling it a fabulous turbo that reignites their desire for another Porsche.
Neutral: @TennCarMan raised a technical question regarding the cooling lines of the vehicle, seeking clarity on whether they had been pinned to prevent potential issues. This inquiry sparked a discussion among several commentors, including @bmdaia, who stated that failures are rare in non-modified cars, indicating a mix of shared experiences and technical considerations. The seller, @1600veloce, provided information about inspection practices and emphasized that while they had no records of the lines being pinned, it remains a common topic in Porsche forums.
Negative: @Kingturbo recounted a personal experience of coolant line failure, expressing concern over potential issues for owners of older vehicles regardless of usage, highlighting the risk associated with aging components. This comment led to further debate about the reliability of the glue used in the coolant lines and whether modifications might predispose the car to failures. @ejackson, while expressing a love for the car, pointed out the design flaw perception regarding the glued lines, indicating that after 25 years, some might see modification as a necessary precaution in light of aging glue.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous comments highlight the beauty and restoration quality of the 1975 Honda MT250 Elsinore. @flyjets01 expresses nostalgia, calling it a "beautiful machine" that represents a childhood dream. @Idylboss also admires the bike, remarking on its excellent appeal while seeking clarification on the gauges, which @ThePetrolVault confirms are likely original. The positive reception is further reinforced by @Sprinkman, who appreciates the dynamic riding video, emphasizing it as key to building buyer confidence and maximizing the bike's selling potential.
Neutral: Some comments present a mix of supportive feedback and constructive critiques regarding the auction presentation. @SwissMJ notes the non-original paint scheme on the tank yet acknowledges the bike's overall appeal. @Kikemon provides suggestions for improving photo quality and structure of the cold start video, which @ThePetrolVault responds to positively by agreeing and offering to make adjustments based on the feedback. Similarly, @hart318 voices concerns about the visibility of details in the dark photos, leading to an improved presentation from the seller who encourages potential buyers to adjust their screen brightness to better view the bike.
Negative: However, not all feedback is positive, with concerns raised about the bike's presentation. @intrepid0421 criticizes the choice of photographing a black bike against a dark background, suggesting it obscures details. @Wards points out the inappropriate use of a tire shine product, which could be unsafe, a sentiment @ThePetrolVault acknowledges but clarifies with the detailing process. Finally, @drscanman expresses inability to discern details for a possible second rider, highlighting potential buyers' dissatisfaction with the image clarity and detail provided.
|
 |
Positive: @Uroscott describes the vehicle as a beautiful rig and notes its capabilities as a great people hauler or towing vehicle. He appreciates that it isn't a 4x4, suggesting that it's lightweight, quick, and has better fuel mileage, making it suitable for highway use. @Fredbgt02 and @Jagoti share a positive perspective on the reliability of the 6.0 engine when well maintained, citing personal experiences with high-mileage examples that have performed reliably. They agree that maintenance is key to ensuring the vehicle's longevity and performance, highlighting that a rust-free condition is a significant advantage.
Neutral: @Wick12345 mentions the vehicle's auction history, stating previous bid dynamics and the impact of the absence of reserve pricing on sale outcomes. He finds it exciting to watch the auction, while also discussing perceptions surrounding the 4x2 model's value and its mileage-related implications. @Nolyaw raised a question about the absence of records for head bolts or EGR work, representing a common concern among potential buyers regarding necessary maintenance records.
Negative: @Nolyaw expresses skepticism regarding the emissions status of the vehicle, implying that this might indicate it has unresolved issues, while @antony1103 wishes it were a 4x4, indicating a preference for that feature. @Wick12345 notes potential challenges with the mileage on the 6.0 engine suggesting it could lead to expensive repairs after purchase, demonstrating apprehension about the overall condition and mechanical reliability. Overall, concerns about maintenance history and inherent vehicle limitations draw a cautious perspective from several commenters.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive qualities. @RedRon is puzzled why the seller would want to sell such a gem, suggesting they must be very satisfied with it. @sliktrak recalls their enjoyment of a similar model, recommending it to potential owners. @AeroSmith shares their personal joy in owning a similarly spec'd car, praising its fun driving experience and capable performance. @zdoctor also expresses love for the car, especially its color and design features. Numerous others, like @gofast182 and @WWM3, support the notion that this model is one of the best in its class, contributing to a positive atmosphere around the listing.
Neutral: Some comments focus on inquiries and clarifications about the vehicle rather than direct opinions. @Jeanny5 asks about any protective film on the car, to which @silverarrowcarsltd (The Seller) confirms that parts of the car have PPF. @DinanM3 raises questions regarding the vehicle's title history and availability, and the seller addresses these concerns directly. Additionally, @SomeDay and @imanenthusiast discuss the sound differences between this model and others, indicating some curiosity among potential buyers. These discussions provide a neutral tone, as they seek information without strong personal opinions being expressed.
Negative: On the other hand, there are some concerns raised in the comments that hint at potential issues or disappointments. @mflee92 expresses disappointment that the car does not meet their specific requirements, wishing it had paddle shifters. @Bruno.e46 laments the status of the car market, suggesting that inflation has led to using cars as capital investments rather than for enjoyment. @sy1616 and @Giggity1 express a desire for additional features such as carbon ceramics, indicating dissatisfaction with the current specs. @imanenthusiast also brings up maintenance issues related to oil changes, which adds a layer of concern about the vehicle's previous care.
|
 |
Positive: @Jake3752 expressed an optimistic view about the vehicle's potential, referring to it as an 'ambitious flip' and wishing the seller good luck in the auction. @Oldwood shared a positive sentiment about C5 Corvettes, calling them the best for the money and stating that they had quite a favorable experience with their own Corvette purchase. @Tobyallen noted the enjoyment of having an open-top feature, stating that this Z06 convertible could be a great alternative for those who miss the open motoring experience, while also expressing how such a vehicle could be a talking point.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) provided insights into the vehicle's auction process, indicating that they strive for transparency and smooth transactions while welcoming inspections by trusted services. They mentioned the vehicle's history briefly in response to inquiries about why it had changed hands multiple times, explaining that it had a consistent ownership history from 2000 to 2021 before being listed on BAT. @mudcar pointed out that the design elements may have been influenced by noted designer John Cafaro, which might create interest in the vehicle's authenticity and custom build.
Negative: @Chuckster58 questioned the seller's motivations behind relisting the car after such a short ownership, suggesting uncertainty about the car's desirability. @Bulldogger and @gs82 raised concerns about how the modification of removing the roof might affect the car's structural integrity and performance. @sheibel expressed skepticism about the vehicle's frequent ownership changes and inquired about the conversion's service records, showcasing doubt regarding the quality and reliability of the modification.
|
 |
Positive: @moonbeam996GT3 notes that the 996.1 Carrera is a phenomenal car and appears to be in nice condition with reasonable mileage and good maintenance history. @Ravdey emphasizes that this example is a perfect combo with limited but good options, highlighting its elegance and uniqueness. @GeorgeEmily and @justanamateur echo sentiments about the 996 being a hidden gem in the Porsche world, appreciating the driving experience and the less luxurious, more raw feel of earlier models. @Euro_Classica (The Seller) describes the car as well-cared for and notes its sought-after nature with a handsome color combination and desirable options.
Neutral: @DerkPerk shows a positive attitude towards the interior color combination while recommending future maintenance on brakes, tires, and clutch. @BaltimoreBill appreciates the specifications as well. There's a mix of opinions on the interior colors, with @Segura911 expressing that Savannah Beige is classy, while @ejackson proposes natural brown as a better match. Some commenters like @Cjd350 and @MdistelBMW request additional photos and history to gain confidence in their bids.
Negative: @Colbyg151 raises concerns about the exterior paint condition, mentioning chipping and pitting. @Momo84 observes that the seller has been unresponsive, noting a lack of presence during the auction, which makes potential bidders hesitant. @Robert4656 voices concerns about unanswered questions regarding leaks, suspension condition, and major services, expressing that clearer communication from the seller would influence his willingness to bid.
|
 |
Positive: @RidleysRides expresses excitement with a simple "Wow!" about the vehicle. @johnnyvett compliments the car's aesthetics, noting its cool color combination and original California plates, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @MarkBartlett describes the Vette as very clean and nostalgically feels the '70s vibe from the pictures, while @crowncityrides admires the car, expressing a wish to have it despite having other plans. @nzvlnr showcases strong interest in the vehicle, emphasizing its condition and low mileage, declaring their intent to own it.
Neutral: @Bob4lin (The Seller) addresses various inquiries regarding the vehicle's air conditioning and components functionality, mentioning the need for a charging of a new compressor. Comments by @alyron and @Towman86 question the vehicle’s low mileage given the extent of restorations and updates it has undergone, raising doubts about its documentation and long-term storage claims. @Dinodino and others seek verifiable proof of the car's mileage and original paperwork to instill confidence among potential buyers, highlighting the importance of thorough inspections and records in such situations.
Negative: Several commenters express skepticism about the vehicle's condition and history. @8tony and @C3Lee challenge the seller's claims about the interior upgrades, calling for clarity on the options available at the time of ordering. Concerns are raised about the implications of prolonged storage affecting various vehicle systems, with @Dinodino outlining potential issues moisture can cause over long periods. @deniscomp criticizes the seller for not adequately addressing these critical concerns, noting hesitations in bidding due to unanswered questions.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the Audi R8 V10, highlighting its appeal as a true gated manual supercar. @anonymous8290 remarked on the car’s reliability and the strong market demand for it, while @Motordad8 expressed excitement, claiming it's his dream specification. Additional positive remarks came from @DrivingEmotions, the seller, who noted the car’s special status and invited potential buyers to view the vehicle without additional fees, further accentuating its desirability. The $157,850 MSRP and unique options added to the allure, confirming its place in the collector’s market.
Neutral: Some comments addressed the features and specifications of the vehicle without leaning heavily toward praise or criticism. @RNLabas confirmed the car's rarity and provided detailed specifications, explaining its unique color and features. Others, such as @bavarianstance and @sixspeed71, provided contextual comparisons to other models, positioning the R8 V10's value in the current market. Additionally, @DrivingEmotions mentioned that they provided driving and walk-around videos to enhance bidders' experience, which some saw as a necessary supplement.
Negative: There were notable criticisms regarding the associated dealer fees, which marred the enthusiasm for the R8 V10. @JimiP and @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 were vocal about the $899 dealer fee, labeling it as outrageous and diminishing the car-buying experience. @Motordad8 echoed these sentiments, refusing to participate in the auction due to such fees, while @blubusdrvr and @Gzilla300 similarly expressed disappointment. The discussions pointed out that the fee could potentially deter serious bids, despite the car's considerable merit.
|
 |
Positive: @Shawh expressed admiration for the car's stylish design, calling it a great car and wishing good luck to the consigner. @GDogg praised it as a lovely sight and admired its vintage appeal. Many commenters, such as @Dollycat3, highlighted the historical significance of the Delahaye 135, recounting its engineering excellence and racing success, which adds to the car's charm and desirability. @gretaBenz90 simply described it as stunning, even in its unfinished state, which resonates with the sentiments of others appreciating its beauty.
Neutral: Comments from @tim54575 (The Seller) conveyed details about the car's condition and history. He responded to inquiries from potential buyers, discussing aspects like the Cotal shifter and its specifications. @ekmcmullen shared insights about the car's unique features, including its eclectic coachbuilder history, and noted that the vehicle is entry-level yet adorable. Various commenters raised questions about past ownership and restoration details, showcasing a mix of curiosity and informational exchanges among participants.
Negative: Some commenters expressed reservations about the challenges associated with owning a vintage luxury car, as noted by @EnstromPilot, who pointed out the difficulty of sourcing parts for the Delahaye. @Drbanzai acknowledged that the vehicle's restoration requires considerable resources and expertise, cautioning that it may not be suitable for everyone due to its needs for dedicated restoration work. Additionally, @Gary_T1 mentioned a general dislike for old French cars but admitted that Delahaye caught his attention, suggesting a divide in preferences among potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received glowing praise from various commentors for its stunning color combination of cream and cocoa, described as beautiful and elegant. @zipdang noted the uniqueness of the color combo, while @KD914 expressed admiration for its uncommon elegance. Commentors like @Oregondave and @ANeillie highlighted the car's appearance, with @Oregondave calling it one of the nicest 987's seen and @ANeillie saying it rivals their own luxurious sapphire with tan interior. The overall consensus is one of appreciation for the car's aesthetic charm, with several wishing they had the space to own it themselves.
Neutral: Several comments were directed to clarify details about the car, including inquiries about the number of previous owners and the specifics of its mechanical condition. @Klondajk asked about the ownership history, which @NormBianchi (The Seller) clarified by stating there were two previous owners, with excellent care records. @willywinkle and @Oregondave sought information about the car's bore scoring and DME report, with the seller responding that he hasn't had the need for such documents as the car runs smoothly. Commentors also engaged in discussions about whether the car was a DFI model, with several confirming the benefits of this engine type in relation to bore scoring issues.
Negative: While the vehicle is largely praised, there are notable concerns expressed by some commentors regarding its mechanical details. @gottatrailer911 requested more information about the condition of the driver's seat and the presence of scratches, indicating a potential concern for wear. Similarly, @anymotorized raised a question about the clutch's original status and remaining life, suggesting some skepticism about its maintenance history. @Lilptr remarked about the rarity of bore scoring in the 987.2 DFI motors, reflecting a cautious interest in the car's mechanical reliability despite its appealing appearance.
|
 |
Positive: @Pager1980 describes the vehicle as a remarkable specimen reminiscent of artistry, suggesting a strong admiration for its aesthetics. @CarCrazyRDM enthusiastically comments on the car's cleanliness, implying confidence in the auction outcome. @Dmon0184 acknowledges the car's recent updates, including a fresh coat of ceramic and a new oil change, which enhances its appeal. Other users such as @N167378 express love for the coupe and appreciate its non-smoking status, indicating positive sentiments towards the car's condition and presentation.
Neutral: @syncroadventure raises valid questions about smog compliance in California due to the vehicle being titled out of state, indicating curiosity rather than criticism. @Cologne_1 inquires why the seller is using the same images as previous auctions, seeking clarification on the vehicle's condition without any negative implications. Similarly, @SchnellFowVay and @Borekas prompt about the missing voltage meter, showing interest rather than dissatisfaction with the car's specifics.
Negative: Concerns have been voiced about the vehicle's auction listings, with @jkkerouac suggesting the potential risk of going 'RNM' due to past sale prices. @Sailvi767 warned about California's stringent registration laws that could pose issues for non-California bidders, adding an element of caution that might deter some buyers. Additionally, @dkf007 and others have requested driving videos and images of paint meter readings, indicating skepticism about the vehicle's condition and performance specifications.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's condition, with @Huntermartin noting that it appears to be a well-cared-for example and @MasterDebator mentioning it is one of the cleanest he's seen. @Gearhed64 adds that it is very nice, while @stainlessillusion humorously mentions hoping for a bid that contains '88'. Additionally, several users reference the vehicle's connection to the 'Back to the Future' franchise, contributing to the positive vibes surrounding the car's uniqueness and cultural significance.
Neutral: Some commenters discuss the car's history and maintenance needs objectively. @FrankO3, the seller, clarifies a mileage discrepancy related to registration in Pennsylvania, asserting the car has only 2 miles from new. @Duaney brings up a common concern among collectors about low-mileage vehicles, questioning why many collectors don't drive them if they enjoy driving. This sentiment is echoed by @89lincolntc, who notes the idea that keeping miles low could increase resale value, leading to a discussion about vehicle usage among collectors.
Negative: There are several concerns raised about the vehicle that paint a less favorable picture. @Just_me points out that the driver's seat shows more wear than expected for a car with just 1600 miles, suggesting it may not have been stored properly. @Autolockerie comments on the engine's sound, speculating about potential fuel injector issues, while @vmaxie22 expresses confusion over the driver's seat condition compared to the passenger seat, indicating a lack of congruence with the reported mileage. Also, @Duaney questions the car's desirability as a daily driver due to its known handling issues.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle for its unique character and thrilling drive experience. @RodsHotRod highlighted the fun of driving a Pantera, noting it was a blast when third gear and secondaries kicked in. Many shared their excitement over the details of the car, such as @Raptorman220 commending the seller's transparency and thoroughness, while @RichB. expressed admiration for the car's condition and history. The responses to the seller's detailed communication also indicate a positive rapport built with potential buyers, demonstrating a good level of engagement and enthusiasm from the community.
Neutral: Several comments offered neutral inquiries about the car's specifications and parts availability. @Rsjg911 asked whether original seats were readily available and inquired about components like the luggage tub and tool kit. @chevyusa1 raised a question about the authenticity of the car's wheels, while @MikeDrew provided insights into various modifications and aspects of the car's construction. This mixture of questions and the seller's detailed responses showcases a collective curiosity and a quest for more information from potential buyers, indicating an informative exchange rather than a purely evaluative one.
Negative: Negative commentary primarily focused on the car's paint condition. Commenters like @Car-fan and @HAREBALL expressed concern over the quality and aesthetics of the repaint, suggesting it would require significant investment to restore. @Car-fan specifically mentioned the 'alligator paint' issue, indicating it would affect their bidding strategy. Additionally, @275GTB pointed out the difficulties associated with the previous owner's extensive repairs, implying that long-term storage could be detrimental to the car's condition. Overall, these comments reflect caution and concern about potential future costs after purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @JakeTheSnake115 expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's tire and rim ratio, appreciating the substantial sidewall. @Damaho912 also complimented the build quality, noting that it has attractive features, though suggesting that the tires might be excessively large for their taste. Overall, there are positive sentiments about the truck's aesthetics and design.
Neutral: @aaronrund, the seller, provided clarifications regarding some concerns raised by commenters. They confirmed that the vehicle features a steel body produced by genuine Ford stamps. Additionally, they addressed questions about the vehicle's mileage, stating it has around 40,000 miles, and provided details about some minor cosmetic issues, such as a paint chip that was inquired about.
Negative: However, there are some mixed comments regarding the truck's appearance. @YoHoll raised a concern about a rough hole in the body panel, speculating it might be a bullet hole, which @aaronrund clarified as merely a paint chip. Additionally, @KSSavannah questioned how the chip occurred, prompting further explanation from the seller about its origin, indicating it happened during the vehicle's finishing process.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting its appealing appearance and potential. @ekhonda87 praises the FD's look and requests a video to see it running, while @Elgriton reiterated their love for the car and stated they would be a bidder if the seller engages with comments. Additionally, @CarGuy2729 appreciates the inclusion of the compression test results and mentions that the vehicle could be a great opportunity for someone looking for an FD.
Neutral: Some comments highlight procedural issues and the need for better communication from the seller. @WesternRedCedar points out that a narrative from the seller would be helpful, and @Blutz3 criticizes the seller for not performing basic maintenance tasks like cleaning or providing adequate photos. Others, like @Nolyaw, pointed out the need for paint meter readings and expressed doubts about the car's chances of a clean sale without more engagement from the seller.
Negative: A number of commenters express frustration regarding the seller's lack of communication and perceived negligence towards the vehicle. @ReddragonSI questions the ethicality of selling a car with a bad battery without making necessary repairs, and @Dean_G shares their negative experience attempting to contact the seller without getting a response. @Wankle69 laments the absence of owner engagement and suggests the seller may not genuinely wish to sell, reflecting a broader sentiment of disappointment among potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the 1960 Cadillac Eldorado Biarritz, highlighting its beauty and elegance. @racerboy221 called it a lovely piece of history, while @boaboyoz described it as 'heavenly bliss' and 'a thoroughly exquisite example.' The @seller received praise for their transparent and detailed presentation, with multiple users, like @MichaelRyerson, acknowledging the car's unique charm and @franJag sharing personal stories linked to the model, further illustrating its nostalgic appeal. Comments celebrated the impactful design, with sentiments like 'absolute stunning car' and 'ART on WHEELS' reinforcing its iconic status among classic car enthusiasts. The upgrades made to enhance drivability, such as a front disc brake conversion and improved air conditioning system, were also well-received, adding to the car's desirability.
Neutral: Several neutral comments emerged, with users seeking more information or clarification regarding specific features of the car. @RossStanard questioned the availability of photos showing the top up, while @Ferraritodd858 expressed interest but requested details about the convertible top's functionality. There were discussions about the various details of the car's condition and modifications, like the installation of seatbelts, with @CORVAIRWILD suggesting that more period-correct options would be preferable. The @seller engaged with these queries, indicating a willingness to provide more content and context for interested bidders, emphasizing the importance of thorough communication. Some users, like @Balance, shared their views on the bidding situation, noting the auction dynamics and expressing curiosity about the potential sale price.
Negative: Negative feedback was minimal but present, with certain commenters expressing reservations about aspects of the car's restoration. @khb647 criticized the color choice, mentioning a preference for gray over gray and deeming the current color a 'hairdresser's car color' which they found criminal. @CORVAIRWILD noted concerns about the installation of aftermarket seatbelts, stating they appeared out of place in a high-end classic. Additionally, there were comments like those from @cruzahome that sought more detailed information about any imperfections, highlighting the desire for transparency in the auction process. The @seller proactively addressed these concerns, providing reassurances about the vehicle's overall condition and inviting potential bidders to review additional materials.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the thrilling driving experience that the BAC Mono R offers. @Round24 expressed that the auction has been an amazing experience, noting that the car provides unmatched excitement akin to that of an open-wheel race car. @HuntingBus shared enthusiasm for the driving sensation, comparing it to cruising on a fast motorcycle but with the safety of a racing harness. Others, like @v8v10p911, praised the car's striking color, suggesting it stands out dramatically, while @Wob (The Seller) emphasized its unique features and high-tech racing qualities, promising pure exhilaration on the road.
Neutral: Several commenters posed questions about the selling process and specifics of the BAC Mono R. @rymrk913 inquired about the quick resale after its recent purchase, to which @HuntingBus provided insights about the challenges of sharing the driving experience with passengers. Other questions, such as seating size and the requirement for an LLC for purchase, were clarified by @Wob (The Seller), ensuring potential buyers understood the auction dynamics and nuances of acquiring the vehicle. Commenters showed curiosity about maintenance and auction procedures, reflecting engaged interest in the vehicle.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism or concern about the BAC Mono R. @mightytrue humorously suggested it might come with a risk to life, citing the car's lack of downforce and safety features typical in mainstream vehicles. This viewpoint intrigued certain members who highlighted the car's racing pedigree but also acknowledged its potential hazards. Additionally, @Ohdannyboy questioned the sudden resale, hinting at possible regrets from the previous owner, while @isaleo2010 raised concerns about maintenance and typical wear associated with high-performance racing cars.
|
|
|