Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm over the arrival of the sensational Senna GTR, praising it as an extraordinary vehicle. @boaboyoz described it as 'total awesomeness' and highlighted its uniqueness thanks to the legendary @seller. @jcole admired the car's wild aesthetics and noted how it stands out compared to others, even McLarens. Commenters such as @johnnyb11 and @jackvetter noted the car's incredible performance capabilities while complimenting its design, with @johnnyb11 stating it would leave a significant impression at any car meet.
Neutral: Some comments offered neutral insights into the vehicle, mentioning its status as a track-only model and its regulations. @diamondhunter pointed out that the Senna GTR, while being an impressive spec, will always be valued less than a road-legal Senna. Others, like @bua19, discussed the technical aspects, mentioning that McLaren favors rear-wheel drive for track performance, reflecting on the car's engineering rather than focusing solely on emotional reactions to its looks.
Negative: Conversely, a few comments took a critical view of the design and practical aspects of the GTR. @SRF humorously noted that while the car is astonishing to drive, its appearance resembled something 'my kids made with Lego.' Other comments raised concerns about the lack of an all-wheel drive system in McLarens, with @96cruiser and @bua19 discussing the weight implications versus performance. Some bidders also expressed light-hearted frustration about the bidding wars and financial implications of owning such an elite vehicle.
 |
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle underline its exceptional beauty and desirability. @GDogg described the 512 TR as 'absolutely fantastic,' emphasizing its color combination with the phrase 'Bellissima!' @boaboyoz noted the 'exquisite evil elegance' and praised the seller, @silverarrowcarsltd, for delivering quality consistently. @Shawh mentioned that the car is finally receiving the respect it deserves due to its significant Italian heritage, and @BeringStar added that it combines luxury and speed, making it a defining and desirable characteristic of this era. Similarly, @RobTX referred to the car as a 'Freak' and @fastlp expressed love for it with heart emojis, highlighting the overall enjoyment found in the car's aesthetics.
Neutral: Several comments focused on clarifications and inquiries about the vehicle's condition and history. @tmatz asked if the Nero color was original, leading to confirmation from @silverarrowcarsltd. @Pizzadude2010 acknowledged a substantial service bill, indicating the importance of maintenance in luxury vehicles. Various users, including @1997spider and @Brettsutherlin, inquired about any potential paintwork or chips, emphasizing a desire for complete transparency regarding the vehicle's condition. This ongoing dialogue about the car's specifications reflects a genuine interest from prospective buyers without indicating any specific dissatisfaction.
Negative: Among the comments, there were some concerns about the potential issues that might arise with the vehicle. @Gord6 raised a question about where to take the car for repairs, while @jbwz65 and @Brettsutherlin asked for details on any chips or imperfections, which might suggest apprehension about the vehicle's perfection. @dkyranakis highlighted the rarity of certain models and preparations for future market appreciation but acknowledged worries regarding maintenance and parts availability in case of breakdowns, reflecting cautious optimism. Overall, these comments reveal a mix of admiration and healthy skepticism regarding the vehicle's upkeep and long-term reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the F12tdf as an absolutely stunning vehicle, noting its appealing color combination of Extra Range Rosso Berlinetta over Blu Medio and commending the seller for a stylish start to the year. @BigT77 admires the vehicle's specifications, expressing that the car has no bad angles and conveys pure Ferrari emotion. @GattoVeloce calls this automobile incredible, likening it to a modern 250 GTO and recommending Chris Harris' video on the car.
Neutral: Several commenters such as @zman4321 and @joemelsha inquire about the window sticker and the specifics about the vehicle's title, with @silverarrowcarsltd providing clarity regarding the duplicate title process. @DRAIDEZ1 expresses hesitance due to the warranty expiration in May, while @lincolncad raises questions about the selling entities involved, showcasing curiosity over the sale's details. Comments about the interior, especially the blue suede, are prevalent, with users praising its appeal and customization.
Negative: @One_for_the_Hill criticizes the idea of leaving such an impressive car unused, echoing sentiments from @diamondhunter who humorously comments on the unnecessary expenses associated with luxury, like Apple CarPlay. @maw06 points out that while the window sticker is required, it seems irrelevant for a car of such extreme performance. Additionally, @Roc9 discusses concerns about the validity of auction bids and the potential for fake offers, casting doubt on market pricing and transparency.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the vehicle as extraordinary and a stunning specimen, while noting the impressive backing from a legendary @seller. Other commenters like @The_Dude_Abides and @CSM1234 also expressed strong admiration for the unique qualities of the Targa with BTR III Conversion, citing its rarity and appealing attributes. @Kstadt911 shared fond memories of the car, indicating the meticulous care it received from its longtime owner, and overall, many felt that the car represented a peak of automotive excellence.
Neutral: Several users, including @IMCARS and @David_P, raised questions regarding the vehicle's California emissions status, highlighting conflicting information about its smog test eligibility. @BayAreaGolfer also contributed to this conversation, indicating that clarifications were needed to understand whether the vehicle could be legally registered in California. The @seller was actively responding to these inquiries, providing updates about emissions documents and the status of California regulations, suggesting a level of transparency and engagement with potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments pointed out concerns regarding the vehicle’s registration in California due to its original European specifications, as noted by @02911dog and @Getragwerk, who discussed the complex regulatory challenges faced by residents wanting to purchase such cars. @02911dog highlighted the frustration with existing legislation that seemingly restricts classic car ownership in the state, and suggested a need for better transparency in the car's description regarding its eligibility for in-state buyers, echoing a sentiment of confusion among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Lamborghini Miura, emphasizing its beauty and design. @expletive praised it as one of the most beautiful cars ever built, while @Defenderfam mentioned the amazing color. The car's aesthetic appeal resonated with @jcole, who called it their dream car, and @RBBGroup noted the current era's appreciation for such timeless creations. Commenters like @Button and @Hoppy18 highlighted the iconic design, linking it to its historical significance, including mentions of its appearance in films and its legacy within the automotive world. Overall, the Miura's status as a dream car or a piece of art was a recurring theme in the positive feedback.
Neutral: Several commenters provided background information about the vehicle's history and specifications. Notable insights were shared by @cardude76, who detailed auction records for this Miura, indicating its fluctuating market value over recent years. @Ferry400 and others discussed the color combination and previous ownership, which sparked interesting conversations about its provenance. @Duncan_same_old offered humorous anecdotes related to the car's history while shedding light on its design and impact on the automotive industry. This neutral commentary focused on facts and experiences rather than emotional evaluations, providing context for enthusiastic discussions.
Negative: In contrast, some comments expressed skepticism regarding the Miura's color combination or the overall desirability of such a vivid hue. @BigT77 and @AutoTraitor remarked on their aversion to the color scheme, suggesting it was jarring or not to their taste. Additionally, @911s55 raised concerns about potential mechanical issues that were heard during driving videos, while @AlPalmer10 called into question the timing of these concerns, hinting at ulterior motives from certain commenters. Overall, these negative remarks indicated a divergence in opinion about the vehicle's aesthetics and condition, showcasing differing perspectives among enthusiasts.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle as a fantastic example of a 1969 Z/28, with multiple enthusiasts like @takethecar highlighting its appealing Fathom Green color. @69CamaroSS expressed admiration for its original factory drivetrain, supported by comprehensive documentation. Other users, including @iamkirkg and @saltmann, appreciated the car's overall excellent condition and originality, stating it represents a rare and well-preserved gem in the classic car community. Commenters like @jihz28 and @camarolynn emphasized the car's historical significance and originality, with many suggesting it should be left untouched to maintain its integrity.
Neutral: A number of comments posed questions and sought clarifications regarding the vehicle's features and history. @iamkirkg, for example, inquired about the type of transmission, while @Ibuild and others discussed details regarding the original options and modifications to the car. Some, like @JimmoVette, expressed curiosity about the vehicle's condition and the specifics of its mechanical features, but many comments were centered around documentation, originality, and preservation rather than negativity.
Negative: While many comments were positive, concerns were raised about certain details of the car's condition, including paint discrepancies identified by users like @YankeeDixie. @MrTrim questioned the legitimacy of the VIN stamping on the engine pad, while @moonframer suggested that the driver's door appeared to be a different shade compared to the fenders. @camarolynn brought attention to the fact that previous owners had added components that were not original to the vehicle, prompting mixed feelings about its authenticity in light of the car's extensive enhancements.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a general admiration for the 2016 Jaguar F-Type R Coupe, highlighting its unique features and aesthetic appeal. @BKZoeller praised the wheels and stance, calling it a 'real eye catcher', while @BuyersEyes also commended its looks and the seller's thoroughness in responding to inquiries. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, maintains a high level of customer satisfaction with a 4.9/5 star rating on Google and offers extensive services including inspections and nationwide shipping, indicating a commitment to quality transactions.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Sami and @JSRay, raised relevant questions about the vehicle's modifications and service history, showing interest in understanding more about the car's condition and past reports. @GHC02 expressed curiosity about the suspected damage report and modifications, while others sought clarification about the wheels and missing parts. The seller assured that the car has original paint and addressed concerns about modifications, providing details about service history which reflects a diligent upkeep of the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding an unspecified 'damage report' from January 2024, leading commenters like @rlhug1954 and @JBS27 to seek clarification on this issue. @GHC02 noted the potential cost implications of replacing OEM wheels, which could amount to around $5,000. While the seller emphasized that the damage report was an error, some buyers remain apprehensive about the vehicle's history and the absence of original wheels, suggesting a wariness towards the car's transparency and integrity.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed a lot of admiration for the vehicle, with many noting its stunning Guards Red color paired with acid green accents. @Hoppy18 called it a "gem," while @DieselM333 described it as "unreal" and @Tghooper emphasized how proper the Guards Red looks on this car. Users like @GLHatWFO found it "off the charts cool" and others are excited to track the auction's progress, with comments indicating it is fun to watch and bidding has already reached high amounts.
Neutral: Several comments posed inquiries or discussed the vehicle in a less enthusiastic manner, with @RedRon questioning the lack of comments on such a high initial bid and @Seena commenting on the acid green brake calipers, suggesting they detract from an otherwise perfect spec. @jpeters1 advised @mickyquinny to address any potential issues with scratches directly to the seller, promoting transparency in the auction process. @silverarrowcarsltd responded to inquiries by clarifying details about the vehicle's condition and auction details, showing engagement with potential buyers.
Negative: Unfortunately, there were also some criticisms or concerns raised, particularly by @mickyquinny, who pointed out a minor scratch and received responses prompting for specific details. Other users flagged certain comments as non-constructive, indicating displeasure with particular remarks or discussions that seemed off-topic or unhelpful. There were also competitive comparisons of auction prices, with a few commenters like @randomlambo expressing that the selling price approached LaFerrari territory, raising concerns about the valuation of the vehicle in the current market.
|
Turbocharged 3.3L-Powered 1978 Porsche 911SC Slant Nose Conversion
9118201313
Lot 226956
Private Party
 |
Positive: @beckseuropean presents a 1978 911SC slant nose conversion with a modified 1978 930 engine, highlighting its impressive dyno results that indicate a high-quality build. Commenters like @johnbennett103 express excitement about the vehicle's performance, noting its lightweight configuration and lack of traction control, which adds to the thrill of driving. @Werkstatt praises the exhilarating experience of this car, suggesting it offers a significant joy factor for drivers, while @Manskraft appreciates the vehicle's unique character and the opportunity it represents for Porsche enthusiasts eager to enjoy a wilder driving experience.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about specific features and aspects of the vehicle. @auniha requests confirmation on potential oil concerns and a cold-start video to see the exhaust, to which @beckseuropean assures there will be a response. @KSJ1865 asks about the materials of the conversion kit, and @wslehman verifies that the A/C system works well even in the heat of Phoenix. The seller maintains open communication, providing necessary information and updates ahead of the auction.
Negative: Some users express skepticism regarding the vehicle's authenticity and reliability. @Type44 raises concerns about the title reading "911TURBO" despite it not being a genuine 930, implying a mismatch in its original configuration. @Copycatyouweasel comments that the current price may not even cover the engine cost, hinting at a potential overvaluation. @Type44 also doubts the durability of the 915 transmission with the power output of the engine, questioning its compatibility given that the factory never paired it with a turbo, raising concerns about the vehicle's performance under heavy stress.
|
 |
Positive: @CDehne mentioned that someone is about to get a great deal on the vehicle, highlighting the value of the bumpers and winch alone being worth more than the current bid. Additionally, @Kasset (The Seller) stated that they have put in $22,000 in upgrades and that everything installed has only 19,000 miles on it, indicating that the vehicle is well-maintained with significant enhancements.
Neutral: @Kasset (The Seller) will provide a cold start video in two days and has opened up the vehicle for test drives, showing willingness to facilitate potential buyers. They confirmed the AC blows cold and noted that a new motor was put in the back window, which cost $1,000, providing reassurance about the vehicle's operational features. @rocketgirlHI expressed an interest in the vehicle and requested to send a friend to view it at the seller's convenience, reflecting some enthusiasm among potential buyers.
Negative: @Broncos4ever pointed out that there was a previous request for a cold start video that the seller may have missed, suggesting a potential lapse in communication. @uswrnk54 asked practical questions regarding the AC and the functionality of the back window, indicating some skepticism or the need for clarity on the vehicle's condition. @rocketgirlHI questioned whether the winch rope was replaced, potentially implying concerns about the vehicle's readiness in off-road scenarios.
|
 |
Positive: @grandprix231 expresses a strong fondness for the vehicle, mentioning that they daily it with 51k miles and only experience issues with fuel consumption around town. @rofandofy shares that they believe this model is the best-looking among the SRT Cherokees, while @dwithbroe reminisces about their own positive experience owning a similar vehicle for ten years, indicating a preference for this model over a newer one despite a lower horsepower. @ivo-b appreciates the cleanliness and originality of the vehicle, describing it as a blank canvas for future restoration, which shows a strong admiration for its potential.
Neutral: @SinisterLife inquires about the accident history from 14 months ago, highlighting a common concern among buyers about the vehicle's past. @Vincenz53 also seeks more information about the accident, indicating that they wish to have a better understanding before continuing their bidding process. @strawzal questions whether the plastic trim on the driver’s seat will be replaced before sale, suggesting attention to detail is important for potential buyers.
Negative: @strawzal expresses disappointment that the broken seat trim and curbed wheels weren't addressed prior to the auction, raising concerns about the vehicle's presentation. @ivo-b acknowledges this issue but notes the practicality of replacing the trim part easily, which indicates some level of frustration towards past maintenance. Overall, some commenters remain skeptical about the condition of the vehicle due to its minor imperfections.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as beautiful and well cared for, which reflects well on its overall condition. @cdrusn compares it to a 560SL at half the price, highlighting that significant investments have been made in key areas, suggesting the car is truly ready for use. @IceyDan310 praises the car's appearance, noting it looks 'spiffy.' Additionally, @Hoppy18 expresses strong positivity toward the R107 model and provides a humorous take on the fuel situation, engaging with the seller and other commenters.
Neutral: @victory-motorsports (The Seller) provides detailed information about the car, indicating that various components have been refreshed and that the vehicle is ready for a new owner. They mention their willingness to assist with shipping and that the rare color combination and original paint contribute to its appeal. @victory-motorsports also responds to inquiries by stating the flashing red light during the drive video was simply a low fuel light and assures users that the car has been checked thoroughly by their Mercedes master technician.
Negative: @genous asks about major problems with the vehicle, particularly concerning the exhaust system and heater, indicating some hesitation on potential issues. @JohnKennelly raises a question about the air conditioning, asking if it functions and blows cold, which suggests the buyer is concerned about operational aspects of the car that might not be up to standard.
|
 |
Positive: @Slam105 described the vehicle as a "very cool Ford 'relic',
Neutral: Commenters seemed to appreciate the vehicle's historical significance and modifications. @Not4Her shared newfound knowledge about Ford's flathead V8 engine, suggesting an engaging dialogue about its specifications. @KBales (The Seller) expressed pride in the vehicle's journey, recalling how it was rebuilt and how happy it made their father, indicating the emotional connections tied to the vehicle. Participants noted the truck's presence at local shows, where it had garnered a couple of trophies and a fond reputation among enthusiasts.
Negative: However, some commenters raised questions about the vehicle's performance. @kenzilla inquired about the 'Under 25 MPH warning sign' on the tailgate, with uncertainty regarding its speed capabilities. @a410traveler humorously commented on its current condition, implying that it might require additional work before becoming a 'treasure' for someone. Overall, while the truck is cherished and holds fond memories for the family, there are clear indications that it may need some attention to enhance its value and usability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm for the MGB, highlighting its nostalgic value and charm. @GregAdamsIL notes the quality of the walk-around video, calling it one of the best, while @BloodyHell praises the car as a great, honest classic with comprehensive videos. @billyblyth describes it as an ideal entry-level classic and expresses confidence in its condition, while @Dbran6172 appreciates the seller's transparency about the car's issues. Overall, the car is seen as a fun and rewarding project, emblematic of classic car enjoyment.
Neutral: Several users share mixed observations about the vehicle's condition and features. @Mayjer comments on the original Harvest Gold color and questions if it has overdrive, while @kretz discusses potential issues with the front bumper overriders. @Sdanen4 and @HadTwo mention the hardtop's materials and height discrepancies, with @Flatcapbertie suggesting a possible suspension modification. Commenters generally agree that while the car requires attention, it also offers an engaging driving experience and a solid foundation for restoration.
Negative: Conversely, there are concerns regarding the state of the vehicle. @gwilli reflects on its rusty appearance and mentions nostalgia while deciding to resist the purchase. @amzman points out a noticeable sagging at the rear, indicating future maintenance will be needed. @Dbran6172 raises a question about a possible crack in the door, while @DAW and @jamesr626 note misaligned parts affecting the overall aesthetic. Such observations hint at the necessity for repairs and highlight some hesitations among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics has a great-looking car available and emphasizes high customer satisfaction, evident from their 4.9/5.0 rating on Google Reviews. Several commenters, like @RemingtonSR71, praise the 2012 BMW Z4 sDrive35i for being one of the most underrated sports GT cars with tunable power and a unique design that enhances driving enjoyment. @wjbruckner and @buckwhite appreciate the seller's transparency about the vehicle's condition and past incidents, showing trust in the seller's communication.
Neutral: The seller, @Collectibleclassics, addresses concerns about previous accidents and repairs, stating that the issues were minor and properly handled, with only a rear bumper repair needed. They clarify that there were no towing incidents and that the car appears well-maintained despite its mileage. Comments from users such as @Dsanbiking inquire about the car's performance, specifically regarding potential smoke at startup, which the seller attributes to condensation due to the car sitting for a while.
Negative: Several comments raised concerns about the car's past, particularly regarding the accidents mentioned. @buckwhite expresses skepticism about how the car could have been hit twice in such a short span, while @robsz06 notes that minor damage typically wouldn't result in a vehicle being towed. @Dsanbiking's observation about smoke at startup is echoed by @robsz06, who suggests it could be indicative of an oil leak from a turbo seal, raising doubts about the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: The 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Supercharged is highlighted for its luxury and performance features, including a supercharged 5.0-liter V8 engine, elegant interior with heated and ventilated seats, and a Meridian sound system. The seller, @StyleCars, emphasizes the vehicle's clean Carfax report, suggesting it is a well-maintained and well-equipped option for bidders. @ck1710 also shared a positive experience meeting @StyleCars, commending their customer service and transparency, recommending potential buyers to bid with confidence.
Neutral: @tompetrovich raised a valid question about the vehicle's Dynamic Mode and active anti-roll bars, indicating a level of confusion regarding the features. @StyleCars clarified that while this Range Rover has active anti-roll bars, it does not come equipped with Dynamic Mode, explaining that these features can exist independently. Additionally, @Dgroos2084 inquired about Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS), and @StyleCars confirmed that this model does not include those features but they were optional in 2016.
Negative: Some potential buyers may have concerns due to the absence of the Dynamic Mode and ADAS options in the 2016 model. @Dgroos2084's inquiry suggests that features such as ADAS have become a standard expectation in newer models, which may lead some to hesitate. It appears there is a need for clarity among bidders regarding mechanical features, as @meamar's question about towing equipment indicates a desire for detailed information on vehicle equipment not explicitly covered in the main listings.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a generally favorable view of the vehicle, with many appreciating its nostalgic value and unique features. @ArchSail reminisced about a similar model from their past, celebrating its personality and reliability, while @19Must68Ang praised the potential performance upgrades available for a sweet little 202. @David_C. highlighted the unexpected quality of the exhaust sound, and @mike_rockwell noted the rarity of the Comet and its simple yet charming design. Overall, commentators seem to enjoy this classic car and recognize its place in automotive history.
Neutral: Several users engaged in technical discussions about the vehicle, with @ford101 and @mtmA2 inquiring about the type of transmission and engine specifications. @jmilo53 pointed out a minor issue with a missing lug nut, and @oldwrench54 commented on the mismatched lug nuts without indicating concern for safety. Inquiries about the condition of the vehicle, such as whether it leaks any fluids, were raised by @19Willys46, who also complimented the car's appearance, showcasing a balanced interest in both aesthetics and functionality.
Negative: A few concerns were raised, particularly regarding potential issues with the vehicle’s wipers, as noted by @Blackbelt. @oldwrench54 questioned the shortness of the lug studs and whether it could pose a risk for retaining the wheels. @jmilo53 and @oldwrench54 mentioned the mismatched lug nuts, hinting at potential oversight in vehicle maintenance, but there was no overt criticism of the car's overall appeal. @Bulletmotorsportsinc, the seller, addressed these points directly, which suggests they are proactive in managing the vehicle's presentation.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed strong interest in the vehicle, highlighting its unique features. @DNAAutohaus (The Seller) provided extensive details about the 1997/2001 Defender 110, noting the smooth-shifting 4-speed automatic transmission and the elegant paint job. The vehicle has been recently serviced by Rover Works in Austin, adding confidence to its mechanical reliability. @WAGONBOYTD mentioned that the vehicle comes with well-documented service history, enhancing its overall desirability. The combination of a Land Rover engine and a high-quality refinish made it particularly appealing to potential buyers.
Neutral: Many comments requested more information and clarification about the vehicle's history and specifications. @ATXSSI wanted to know how a brand new D110 was brought into the USA in 2001, while @FiscallyIrresponsible raised concerns over the absence of a CarFax report due to the assigned VIN. The discussions also touched upon the vehicle’s original VIN and importation paperwork, which were deemed important by several users, including @GVW62. Overall, comments reflect a mix of curiosity and the need for transparency regarding its provenance.
Negative: Some commenters were skeptical about the vehicle's authenticity and legality. @djb_rh expressed that the vehicle appears to be a hodgepodge of parts, raising questions about its build and history. The concerns about the conversion from right-hand drive to left-hand drive were echoed by @2hecknback, who noted the challenges that could arise during titling or registration in some states. Overall, there was a sense that potential buyers should proceed with caution due to the vehicle's ambiguous history and possible lack of official records.
|
 |
Positive: @collectibleclassics provides a welcoming and informative atmosphere for potential buyers, showcasing a commitment to transparency and high-quality transactions. @Fairmont663336 describes the vehicle as a 'gorgeous car in and out,' emphasizing its beauty with phrases like 'real grown-up car for a true gentleman.' Additionally, @BrownDaMi highlights their positive experience with this dealership, sharing a confidence-boosting testimonial about a previous purchase, suggesting that future customers can expect a smooth transaction as well.
Neutral: The seller provides essential details about the vehicle's features and history, addressing inquiries about aspects like tire age, recalls, and the condition of the car. @Garyrxn raises valid concerns about potential cosmetic repairs and recalls, and the seller responds by assuring that the car's condition is primarily cosmetic and that there are no open recalls according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. @MtnMadMan asks about features like the cold weather package, showing interest that many buyers might have regarding comfort options.
Negative: While many of the comments are positive or neutral, there are some concerns raised about the vehicle's condition. @Garyrxn points out possible issues with repainted sections of the vehicle, prompting discussions about potential past damages. Additionally, there are queries about undisclosed recalls and specific features that remain unanswered initially, causing some uncertainty regarding the car's maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight a strong interest in the vehicle, particularly for its unique offerings as a kei truck. @TokyoMotorsDC provided helpful insights about the vehicle's attributes and regulations, clarifying that these trucks are only available in right-hand drive and confirming that they contain no airbags. This attention to detail and willingness to engage with potential buyers adds a positive tone to the discussion, indicating a supportive seller willing to answer questions about the vehicle's specifications and legal context.
Neutral: Several inquiries have been raised about the vehicle's usability and registration details. @Farfman queried the availability of a crew cab option and left-hand drive versions, while others like @asciderditch and @JohnNat1971 explored practical questions regarding shipping logistics and street legality. @TokyoMotorsDC responded with essential information on Maryland's historic tag laws and the constraints surrounding the sale of newer kei trucks to state residents, emphasizing the importance of understanding local regulations when considering this type of vehicle.
Negative: Concerns were voiced regarding the legal status and safety features of the truck, with @jbowders questioning the presence of airbags and @asciderditch implying that the lack of airbags may hinder shipping options. Additionally, the changes in registration laws for Maryland residents have raised barriers, as these trucks cannot be registered as historic vehicles if they are from 2000 or later, creating potential limitations for local buyers. Overall, these negative aspects illustrate some challenges and restrictions surrounding ownership and practicality of the kei trucks.
|
27-Years-Family-Owned 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle Sport Coupe 4-Speed
136370A100217
Lot 226974
Private Party
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the Chevelle, noting its visual appeal and unique qualities. @Jonderefan complimented the clever sound video used in the listing, while @a990dna shared a love for the Cortez Silver color on Chevelles. @Lancer13 found the cold start video compelling, further highlighting the car's beauty. The seller, @MyAutoValet_LLC, shared fond memories of using the car for family outings and emphasized its well-maintained condition, claiming it spent most of its life in a garage and had enjoyed minimal driving. The electric brake pump installation and routine maintenance were also highlighted positively, indicating ongoing care for the vehicle.
Neutral: There were discussions regarding the verification of the vehicle's authenticity as a Super Sport (SS). @TheBill and @ssterry engaged in providing technical advice on where to find the necessary documentation and identifiers that could validate whether the Chevelle is a true SS. @NastyNat's inquiry about a lien was met with @WishfulThinker23's clarification about the lien's resolution process upon sale, emphasizing the importance of clarity in transactions. The seller, @MyAutoValet_LLC, acknowledged the ambiguity surrounding the vehicle's SS status while presenting circumstances that could suggest it, such as the original rear axle and reinforced frame, generating a collaborative atmosphere among commenters to ascertain the car's history.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's condition and background, particularly regarding its status as an SS. @SOTW pointed out potential rust spots in the trim, inquiring for additional photos, while @rseitz challenged the seller's claims about the reinforcement related to the frame, suggesting that it could be misrepresented and did not conclusively indicate an SS pedigree. @ssterry provided a thorough assessment of what to look for regarding casting numbers and original parts, emphasizing that without clear documentation, uncertainties regarding the vehicle's authenticity could diminish its value. The inability to provide definitive proof of its original status seemed to temper some enthusiasm among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @roverlover06 called it a "Gorgeous Galway" and praised its fun driving with the 5L engine. @JackMac complimented the color combination and the Stormer wheels. @FirehouseVintage (The Seller) mentioned that this is a low-mileage, well-optioned vehicle with features like premium sound and heated seats, stating it drives exceptionally well, evidenced by nearly 1000 miles driven back at the dealership. @boatymcboatface expressed admiration for the beautiful and rare color, expressing a wish that Land Rover produced more vehicles in this shade.
Neutral: Several commenters requested additional information and clarifications, such as @Jacdoyle asking for photos of the keys and @AirForceWon requesting videos of the air suspension and drive mode changes. @DThiry88 noted the surprising depreciation of these vehicles past a certain mileage and expressed admiration for the truck's aesthetics compared to previous perceptions about luxury vehicles. @FirehouseVintage (The Seller) actively engaged with commenters to address inquiries about the vehicle's condition and confirmed the reliability of the speedometer after being questioned by @Revmatch.
Negative: Despite the vehicle's overall appeal, comments such as @DThiry88 highlighted concerns about resale value and reliability, comparing it unfavorably to the Toyota 4Runner. @430NYC raised an issue regarding the paint condition seen in specific photos, which @FirehouseVintage (The Seller) attributed to environmental factors rather than damage. Some commenters, like @3Kees, expressed frustration over a trend of black vehicles dominating the auction market, reflecting a worry over the variety and uniqueness of available options.
|
 |
Positive: @smankin praises the car's appearance, noting its rarity, low mileage, and high-quality features, highlighting a near-identical counterpart he owns, while wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @thkfast remarks on the impressive maintenance history and high level of options on the M6, suggesting it presents a great value for potential buyers. @clawson9 states that the car looks beautiful, expresses curiosity about the possibility of the original window sticker being included, and expresses excitement about watching the listing.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) welcomes commentors and provides detailed information about their business and the vehicle, including its location, open hours, and available inspection options. They respond to inquiries about CarFax and specific vehicle details, assuring customers of the accuracy of the mileage. They also share that they can assist with logistics related to the purchase, thereby creating a welcoming atmosphere for prospective buyers.
Negative: @Mano2nv83 questions a potential mileage discrepancy in the car's history, wondering if Carfax will resolve it. @revsrav raises concerns regarding the Carfax report, requesting clarification on the title's mileage. @HockeyMars expresses confusion about the timeline of the sale and seeks additional proof regarding the car's condition, asking for a photo of a damaged armrest and sharing concerns about specific repairs.
|
 |
Positive: @JohnnyLoophole thinks the vehicle is "pretty damn sweet," and @Vailgal appreciates the great color. @gstepp22 compliments the Camaro’s look and expresses enthusiasm about it pairing nicely with his new 2010 blue SS. @Gmmuscleusa praises the awesome color combo, calling it a quality build, and @bkoz52 finds value in the car regardless of badge legitimacy, noting it’s a beautiful model. @Al_Swearengen finds the non-red color refreshing, and @69CAMSS compliments the interior contrasting colors, calling it visually appealing. @boaboyoz admires the lovely appearance of the Camaro in blue over white, while @ssterry echoes the praise for its great looks and love for the understated vibe.
Neutral: @Lurvey asks for clarification about the body and whether the quarters, floors, and trunk pan are original. @Eparkinson inquires about the functionality of the lights, gauges, and switches, while @Mackiesback questions if the replacement engine is a rebuilt original and if the car retains its original color. @Rander05 (The Seller) responds to these inquiries, stating that the body is original and mentions a video showing the instruments' functionality. He also provides updates about the engine, confirming it is not the original but has been rebuilt, and shares links to videos of a cold start and driving scenario.
Negative: @dav60bat critiques the modifications, implying most vehicles are poorly outfitted like they came from a parts catalog, wishing the car luck with sales. @shipwreck521’s comment was flagged as non-constructive, indicating a possible negative or irrelevant attitude. @911s55 points out an inconsistency about the driving video, claiming it wasn't recent due to weather conditions not aligning with the season, which could suggest skepticism about the video's timing.
|
 |
Positive: @TheObsidianCollection (The Seller) describes the Ducati Hypermotard SP as a fun and exciting motorcycle that brings joy to every ride. @Westfalia_Will shares his positive experience, emphasizing that the bike is more comfortable than sport bikes and acknowledges the seller's reliability based on multiple past purchases. @Showerfan calls the bike a proper hooligan machine and appreciates its longer service intervals, noting that they are not as delicate as older Ducati models. Overall, multiple commenters highlight the thrilling nature of the bike and its popularity among owners.
Neutral: @TheObsidianCollection (The Seller) engages actively with potential buyers, answering questions about the service history and offering a discounted rate for the Desmo service if desired. @Vin2Fast raises concerns about the absence of service records while @JT77 seeks information on servicing and fit for shorter riders. @Sorebones emphasizes the importance of documentation regarding the timing belts, which brings up key selling points for potential bidders, indicating a shared understanding of maintenance importance.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns regarding the lack of documentation for the Desmo service, with @Vin2Fast and @JT77 specifically highlighting the difficulty of finding qualified service providers in the area. @Skiv criticizes Ducati's business strategy regarding the bike's exhaust, implying that the initial cost may be misleading due to additional expenses required shortly after purchase. Overall, these concerns may leave potential buyers wary about the full cost and maintenance history of the bike.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters shared enthusiasm for the 1989 Mustang LX Hatchback, highlighting its unique characteristics. @Johnsoon978 expressed excitement about the automatic transmission, noting that they appreciate automatic cars and wished to see more preserved examples like this one. @Ycbmsma pointed out the merit in enjoying the driving experience regardless of the transmission type, emphasizing that the car appears well-preserved and could serve well as a cruiser. Additionally, @Mid_60s_fan shared an impressive performance anecdote about their own automatic Mustang, reinforcing the idea that automatics can also deliver excitement.
Neutral: Several comments focused on technical aspects, such as @topduarte mentioning the importance of mileage pictures, while @Kurt_T expressed curiosity about the bidding trajectory, particularly because the vehicle is an automatic. @DKeng contributed to the discussion by acknowledging the growing appreciation for automatic vehicles among older enthusiasts, suggesting that drivers' needs change over time. The seller, @EMG01, also participated in clarifying that OEM headlights are included and responded positively to inquiries about the vehicle's condition and features.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the car's physical condition. @alltow noted potential issues with the bodyline and questioned if there had been prior damage, while also pointing out a paint drip in another area. @johnkritikos72 expressed frustration with the automatic transmission, expressing a preference for manuals. However, this sentiment was countered by comments asserting the enjoyment of automatics, suggesting a divide in opinions about vehicle preferences.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the 1999 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec, often referring to it as a beloved icon from the 'Godzilla' lineage. @KhoabachD, the seller, showcases his enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting its inner beauty and the opportunity for potential buyers to view it in person or participate in a FaceTime tour. Enthusiasts like @luke00731 and @longDucDong reminisce about their longstanding desire for a car like this, while others remark on the stunning Bayside Blue color, emphasizing its desirability among JDM lovers. Several comments reflect excitement over the car's aesthetic and performance potential, often leading to supportive discussions from other individuals in the community.
Neutral: Some commenters seek clarification on the car's history, particularly regarding previous repairs and the authenticity of the mileage readings. @ffa and @Eferrari34 inquire about specific details on the vehicle such as front damage and repainting, while @xPhantom highlights discrepancies in the mileage listing, noting the CarVX report as potentially misleading. @KhoabachD responds to these concerns transparently, offering documentation and paint meter readings to assuage doubts and inviting further queries from interested parties. This completes a dialogue with potential bidders who want a clear picture of the car’s condition before placing bids.
Negative: On the other hand, a certain subset of comments raises concerns about the vehicle's history and condition, claiming it may have undergone significant repairs after accidents. Comments from @jdmkars and @calpolo17 suggest that the seller might downplay accident damages, emphasizing the importance of due diligence for potential bidders. They express skepticism about the claims of 'minimal damage' and urge prospective buyers to verify the auction sheet, which alludes to structural concerns. @chuckgc8 also challenges the seller on discrepancies in the reported mileage and repairs, lending to an atmosphere of caution among some commenters who advocate for a thorough inspection before proceeding with any purchase.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Lamborghini Espada's design and overall aesthetic, remarking on its unique styling and features. @topduarte called attention to the 'beautiful lines' of the car, while @Andrew_Leeson praised its color scheme, stating that Argento suits the Espada well. Other enthusiasts described it as a 'fantastic' and 'awkwardly beautiful' vehicle. @Garagerat highlighted the car's practicality as a family car, emphasizing its four-seat capacity and the convenience of the hatchback. Overall, the car's distinctiveness and driving experience were celebrated, with several comments noting its appeal among collectors.
Neutral: Some comments included historical context and additional information about the car's specifications and car market trends. @Ferry400 provided details on the Espada's production numbers and original configurations, which was useful for potential bidders. Commenters like @SlowNRusty shared their auction experiences with the Espada, providing insights into past sales without indicating a direct opinion on the current offering. @WCDM (The Seller) actively engaged with these queries, maintaining transparency regarding the car's condition, repairs, and past issues, which contributed to a neutral atmosphere in discussions.
Negative: Conversely, there were critical comments that highlighted concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and potential restoration issues. @mike_747 and @SlowNRusty both noted the presence of a crease on the driver's door, implying that it would require professional repair. Concerns were also raised about the chasis being covered in excessive undercoating, leading some to worry about hidden rust issues. Additionally, comments indicating skepticism about the car's market value and a softening in demand, especially given its history as a U.S. car now in Canada, suggested potential barriers for buyers. This mix of apprehension showcases how varied opinions can be regarding classic cars in the auction space.
|
 |
Positive: @Henhen11 (The Seller) showcases a well-built and tastefully modified 2005 Jeep Wrangler TJ equipped with a reliable 4.0 6 cylinder engine and a 6-speed manual transmission. The seller emphasizes that no expense was spared during the vehicle's build, offering potential buyers confidence in its quality. Enthusiastic about engaging with prospective bidders, @Henhen11 encourages questions and promises to provide additional videos and photos for a thorough inspection of the vehicle.
Neutral: Comments from @billybeto and @64ROVAH reflect a curiosity about specific features of the Jeep, such as the Metalcloak front bumper's towing capabilities and the interior condition regarding rust. @64ROVAH also inquires about the timing for the promised videos and expresses concern about any potential driveline vibrations at highway speeds. @Kevin_Bowley shows interest in the availability of the stock airbox, indicating the vehicle's intended use in a dusty environment, further underscoring the practical considerations of potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns arise from comments about the visible rust in the photos, prompting requests for additional pictures of certain areas like the floor pans and rear seating. @64ROVAH's inquiry about driveline vibrations at highway speeds suggests possible issues that could affect the driving experience, while @billybeto questions the safety rating of the front bumper for RV towing. Such inquiries may indicate apprehension about the Jeep's overall condition and utility.
|
 |
Positive: @NoWildLand mentioned that the Bronco is nice and praised the video, noting the absence of wind noise throughout the recording, which suggests quality in presentation. @boaboyoz called it a 'bodacious black Bronco' and complimented the build, expressing a positive sentiment with 'GLWTA.' @Trailboss highlighted the advantage of a fiberglass body, stating that it doesn't rust, which is a favorable trait compared to traditional Bronco bodies known for rust issues.
Neutral: @Bulletmotorsportsinc (The Seller) provided detailed information about the auction process, indicating that they respond to inquiries promptly during the auction and encouraging bidders to review their sales history and feedback. They emphasize the importance of following through with bids as well as additional services offered like financing and shipping. The comments reflect an informative stance on the auction without expressing strong opinions regarding the vehicle itself.
Negative: No negative comments were made regarding the vehicle in the provided comments. While @NoWildLand expressed a preference against fiberglass bodies, this sentiment was not entirely negative as they acknowledged others might appreciate it.
|
 |
Positive: @richrat expressed enthusiasm for the car, stating "LOV the car!" indicating a strong appreciation for its appeal. Additionally, @nbalagam, the seller, assured @jenVonVette that payment in CAD $ is possible if they win the auction, showing flexibility and customer friendliness.
Neutral: @nbalagam answered various inquiries about the vehicle. In response to @exrdhd's concerns about a potential rust hole, @nbalagam clarified that the vehicle has not been winter driven and suggested the issue in image 78 appeared to be debris. Furthermore, @nbalagam addressed @doggerdave's mileage concerns, explaining the mileage discrepancy as a misprint, and also confirmed to @killasamsam that the doors were professionally repainted due to keying, not from any accidents, and that the vehicle could be sold with a safety certificate.
Negative: @INFERNO3 mentioned a desire for a cleaner engine compartment in the vehicle's images, implying a need for better presentation. @Vremacs-BAT raised a concern about deterioration in one of the images, and both @acrosier and @killasamsam questioned the repainting of the door and safety certification, indicating some suspicions regarding the car's history or condition.
|
Turbo K24-Powered 2007 Porsche 911 Carrera 4S Cabriolet 6-Speed
WP0CB29987S775262
Lot 226986
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle's potential and modifications. For example, @SteveTheodore emphasized that K24 conversions can be fun and powerful, while @LongDucDong suggested taking it to a race shop for more horsepower. @Trey.Trantham congratulated @Nickwit (The Seller) on winning the car and lamented that he couldn't keep it, showing appreciation for its appeal. Commenters like @Dgroos2084 and @wamcneil recognized the vehicle's nice execution despite concerns about its non-originality, indicating a level of interest and intrigue within the community.
Neutral: Several respondents raised questions about the vehicle's condition and details, such as @malcoll asking if the soft top functions properly and @g00dtrip requesting videos. @Nickwit (The Seller) provided insights regarding registration issues in Connecticut and mentioned ongoing electrical problems and the fun of driving it. Various users sought clarification on technical aspects like oil change accessibility, checking the dipstick, and the check engine light status, which suggests that many are assessing how practical the vehicle would be for them if they considered purchasing it.
Negative: Concerns were voiced about the seller's rapid resale of the vehicle, with @acett and @KVNV echoing suspicions about possible mechanical issues like a blown motor. @OG_Rob pointed out that the car had a questionable history involving a past raffle, implying a lack of trust about its condition. @mick59 cautioned against modifications, stating that just because you can, doesn't mean you should, while others expressed confusion and skepticism about the overall value and desirability of the car, particularly regarding its unusual build and modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @Mr_wbt described the Charger as a great looking vehicle, appreciating its original look and components. @boaboyoz mentioned the car's light blue metallic color as magnifique and praised its beautiful build. @072298jrw shared their enjoyment of the Mopar's interior with a buddy seat and complimented the rare frost blue metallic paint, expressing gratitude that the car was kept more original rather than being heavily modified.
Neutral: @cbarten (The Seller) confirmed that a video will be posted showcasing the car running and all gauges working, while clarifying that the odometer reading did not register test mileage due to calibration issues. They stated all restorations were completed recently, with paint work done by Radim's Restoration in Illinois and the rest by HI Power Restoration in Wyoming. Responding to @AzBatman, @cbarten also noted that the engine is not numbers matching and provided details about the engine rebuild process and components, while mentioning that they would find out more information about the block upon their return from a trip.
Negative: @83HURST expressed a concern about the gaps on the passenger door and hood not being aligned correctly despite painting efforts, indicating a lack of attention to detail. @MoparSS inquired about the age of the body and paint as well as the drivetrain work, expressing skepticism about the quality of the restoration. Additionally, @NMendez22 shared doubt about the sale price, referencing their own numbers matching 440 Rt/Se Charger, and implied that the current version might not fetch a similar high bid.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, often using superlative language. @maioman described it as 'jaw droppingly beautiful,' while @JoeKretired noted it as a 'great resto' with a 'classy interior.' @WoodrowWilson also contributed positively, saying he likes 'everything about it' including the color and interior, branding it as the 'best of both worlds.' Furthermore, there were mentions of the vehicle being a stunning build, and @teamshort highlighted the quality of the build by stating that everything fitted into the car was new, including a crate new LS7 engine.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specifics regarding the vehicle's build and history. @GreggC humorously noted the vehicle's impressive power-to-weight ratio while @toking75 shared his long history with Corvettes expressing interest in the build but mentioned financial constraints. @petcar3388 asked for the cost of the build, while @RW1968 sought additional information regarding the car's purchase history and build invoices, indicating a general curiosity about the vehicle without expressing strong opinions either way.
Negative: On the downside, there were a couple of critiques. @willie2323 commented on the detail of the vehicle but criticized the choice of seatbelts, suggesting that with such a beautiful design, better options should have been explored. @teamshort (The Seller) acknowledged the critique, agreeing that the seatbelt choice was not ideal, which may indicate some oversight in the build despite the overall high quality of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg expressed excitement about the vehicle's return to BaT, wishing it well. @monro complimented the car's quality and provided helpful information on retrieving the missing radio code, detailing a straightforward process that involves the radio's serial and part numbers. @Reset_theclockplease also praised the car's beauty, asking if any maintenance checks would be necessary for a long drive home, indicating a positive view of its condition.
Neutral: @CarFix9740 (The Seller) clarified that the convertible top issue may require a dip switch or reprogramming by a Mitsubishi scan tool. They confirmed that the valve covers are in good shape and that there is no rear main leak, providing reassurance about the car's mechanical state. @Askyosi inquired about the presence of two keys and factory books, showing interest in the car's completeness, while @Northbaymotors1 sought clarification on the roof's operation but was redirected to review the ad and multimedia provided by the seller.
Negative: @sbrunthaler warned about an easy repair related to the trunk lid's "closed" sensor, suggesting possible issues with the car that need addressing. @Northbaymotors1's concern about the convertible roof's functionality highlighted the ambiguity surrounding the vehicle's issues, possibly leading to doubts from potential buyers. Lastly, the lack of factory books and only one key reported by @CarFix9740 (The Seller) could be viewed as a drawback, which might deter some interested parties.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed their appreciation for the transparency of the seller, particularly @Fuelieguy who pointed out the clear disclosures provided throughout the listing process. The engaging driving video shared by the seller, as noted by @M-gineer, helped to visualize the car's capabilities and sparked enthusiasm among potential buyers. The detailed examination of the car's features and issues has also garnered praise, with commenters like @diskis190 highlighting how these insights can alleviate buyer concerns about the vehicle's accident history and repairs needed. @Nawar also commended the seller and their team for creating an informative listing that detailed the vehicle's condition effectively.
Neutral: Several commenters have raised questions regarding the vehicle's history and condition, expressing a mix of intrigue and caution. @Hej pointed out potential issues stemming from an unreported 2015 accident, suggesting possible frame damage and alignment concerns, while @Sintorion requested an alignment printout to clarify these worries further. Meanwhile, @GrigioF430 advised a cautious approach regarding maintenance costs associated with the car, noting that while some repairs can be handled without significant expense, others may be costly if not addressed properly from the start. Commenters also discussed the car's overall appeal, acknowledging that while it may require repairs, it still holds value as a unique Ferrari model.
Negative: However, the comments also reveal significant concern among potential buyers about the car's expensive repair history and its ongoing maintenance needs. @PALM4 lamented the financial burden of repairs the previous owner has faced, estimating costs that could add up to over $30,000. @Beach_comber pointed out mechanical issues mentioned in the listing, hinting at repairs potentially costing between $20,000 to $40,000, which elicited skepticism about the car's future drivability. @Copycatyouweasel expressed doubt about the car's ability to pass inspection due to its issues, implying considerable amounts of work required just to make it roadworthy. Overall, these comments reflect a cautious stance toward potential ownership, given the highlighted mechanical challenges and repair history.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle are overwhelmingly positive. @LandSpeedster appreciates its aesthetics, calling it a "good looking rig." @nicksatkovich compliments the color scheme of British Racing Green over tan as a "fantastic combo," while @GDogg remarks on how the brown leather interior complements the exterior beautifully. @EOD217 sends good wishes for the auction, indicating general enthusiasm for the car's appearance. @ripper996 highlights the appealing shade of British Racing Green, further confirming the stylish presence of the vehicle. @Jhurlow shares a personal experience, praising the sound system and expressing admiration for the car’s performance and luxury features, emphasizing the enjoyment of driving it.
Neutral: Several comments focused on queries regarding the vehicle features and specifications. @charron98 inquires about the sound system, and @kpbamg asks for a comparison between the V8 and V12 engine sounds. @waytoomanycarsshesays shows interest in whether the car has blind spot monitoring, and @Scubaaah seeks information on any imperfections in the interior or exterior. The seller, @greenerdays11, provides informative responses, confirming that the car is equipped with the Bentley sound system, blind spot assist, and has no imperfections as shown in the photo gallery. Additionally, inquiries about night vision capabilities by @funknyuyao and issues with the rotating display by @justinstephen receive prompt clarifications about features working as intended.
Negative: There are a few comments that could be perceived as negative or at least point out issues. @RSB-Scottsdale had comments flagged as non-constructive, hinting at possible criticisms or concerns not directly voiced. @PBGcarnut raises questions regarding the vehicle's chrome grill and trim, seeking clarification on whether they were wrapped or painted, which suggests a level of scrutiny regarding the vehicle's modifications. Overall, while no direct negative comments about the vehicle's performance or appearance are made, these insinuations indicate a need for more transparency on its modifications.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described as a very clean example of a one-owner Jeep Wrangler Rubicon, with both @lted9319 and @stingray19 expressing approval of its condition. @amotorsports (The Seller) mentions that the Jeep has been well cared for, runs and drives great, and is a non-smoker vehicle with a clean title. They affirm that the vehicle presents honestly and that it has undergone repairs, specifically mentioning the professional repair of a previously seeping rear main seal, indicating the seller's transparency about its history.
Neutral: The comments reflect a variety of inquiries focused on the vehicle's maintenance and functionality. @lted9319 raises questions about the vehicle's history, particularly concerning any records of oil changes in the initial 30,000 miles, while also noting past entries regarding oil, engine, and transmission leaks. Other commenters like @camptx and @stingray19 seek clarification on specific mechanical aspects, such as the types of shocks installed, air conditioning performance, and potential issues like clutch chatter, indicating a discerning interest in the vehicle's overall reliability.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle’s potential issues are expressed by commenters like @jakeob, who warns about the notorious frame rot associated with this model and requests visual evidence to alleviate those worries. Although @amotorsports (The Seller) asserts that the Jeep shows no signs of rot, these inquiries indicate a level of skepticism from potential buyers about the vehicle's long-term durability. The lack of available service records for the first 30,000 miles also contributes to doubts about the vehicle's maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: @terrybravis has provided detailed information about the vehicle, highlighting the removable camo vinyl accents and the efficient battery system that allows for prolonged use of the AC. Commenters like @svatem appreciate the camo accents, while @mike175gr praises the thorough descriptions and attention to detail regarding the features. The strong and versatile modifications seem to be a selling point, making the vehicle attractive to potential buyers looking for something unique and functional.
Neutral: Several comments from potential buyers focused on practical questions about the vehicle's features, dimensions, and title transfer process. @NisswaBob inquired about the lien process for the title, while @Phillips66 asked whether the front seats could swivel. @motherduce and @JESPKR also sought specific dimensions and layout information, indicating a genuine interest in the van's usability and configuration. @terrybravis has been responsive, providing clarification on these topics, which underscores a constructive dialogue between the seller and interested parties.
Negative: However, there are some concerns raised about the vehicle's history and practicality. @Pcboogaard questioned the vehicle's suitability as a hunting rig, noting that there were multiple previous owners, which could indicate potential issues. @terrybravis clarified that two of the "owners" were dealers and reiterated their own positive experience, but some commenters, like @dwithbroe, have noted apprehensions regarding the electrical system, with @racerex411 referencing potential quirks that could arise. Overall, while the vehicle has received praise for its modifications, there are doubts regarding its past ownership and reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's overall condition, with @EJMP noting the cleanliness of the engine bay and @Stugats2 calling it a stunning Cadillac. @59caddyman, the seller, asserts that this low-mileage 1976 Cadillac Eldorado Convertible is in exceptional shape, having been well-preserved and cared for. Several commenters, including @greene1111, appreciate the car's lack of rust and the integrity of its original parts, while @59caddyman emphasizes the performance, noting how it drives beautifully and highlighting its well-maintained interior as 'gorgeous.'
Neutral: There are discussions regarding the car's stance and functionality, particularly concerning the self-leveling system, which @Eagle32 questions due to the car appearing to sit unevenly. However, @pgfarley mentions that such a stance is typical for these particular models. The seller clarifies that the car has been used and cared for without deterioration, countering skepticism about the mileage and standing behind its condition with documented history. Additionally, @BuffaloJim raises technical queries about the AC and power functions, showing genuine interest in the vehicle's functionality.
Negative: A few comments raise concerns about the vehicle's suspension and leveling system. @V-baby expresses doubt about the factory correctness of its stance, elaborating on their own experiences with similar models where the auto-level system had failed. @greene1111 also suggests the underside should be cleaner given the mileage. @Ramenator and others hint at the common sentiment against unnecessary modifications like adding faux horns to the Cadillac, implying a preference for authenticity over gimmicks.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters consistently praised the Packard for its stunning design and historical significance. @CharlotteWheels called it 'Stunning!', while @Dollycat3 described the Standard Eight Series 902 as 'elegant' and 'stylish', highlighting its engineering and refined styling during difficult economic times. @Lewis shared a nostalgic appreciation for classic European cars, specifically noting how the Packard exemplifies refinement and class, with the quiet hum of its tires on grass at car shows. Overall, enthusiasts admired the car’s elegant curves and luxurious details, with many expressing a deep emotional connection to the brand's legacy.
Neutral: Some comments ventured into discussions on the car's engineering features and performance specifications. @Dollycat3 provided detailed insights into the vehicle's advanced engineering elements, including adjustable shocks and a robust straight-eight engine. Meanwhile, @Dentl6 (The Seller) offered updates about the car, confirming that the automatic chassis lubrication system functions properly and that a new battery has been installed, which aligns with common expectations for a vehicle of this age. There was also curiosity about the condition of the body wood and operational status of various parts, highlighting the interests of potential buyers in the vehicle's overall state.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's components and construction quality over the years. @TheOMDude expressed skepticism about Packard's reputation, questioning the car's distinguishing features compared to other brands that utilized advanced technologies. Additionally, concerns were noted regarding the lubrication system as mentioned by @Dairyman, who acknowledged that Packards generally have oil leaks, which some potential buyers might find off-putting. Questions about missing features, such as windshield wipers, also arose with @Dentl6 confirming their removal, leaving some apprehensive about the car’s completeness and usability.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed delight in the overall aesthetics and restoration quality of the MGA. @hueyhoolihan noted that the car is a 'pretty darn sweet restoration,' while @smitty122 described it as 'a beautiful MGA.' @Ferndinand appreciated the added features such as the side mirrors and wind deflectors. Furthermore, @guyforesman (The Seller) highlighted that the car not only looks good but is fun to drive, emphasizing its suitability for tall drivers.
Neutral: Multiple commenters sought clarification on specific features of the vehicle, indicating a positive engagement with the car's details. @v-tail11 raised questions about the conversion to negative ground and differential gears, while @Twobeagles inquired about the Auster windshield. @Schemphirth suggested that additional photos of the underside would be beneficial, and @morganplus8 acknowledged the fit of the doors and sills, expressing a desire for a period radio instead of the installed one.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, there were a few critiques regarding some aspects of the car's presentation. @smitty122 criticized the short driving video, suggesting that it lacked important information about the vehicle's performance. Additionally, @v-tail11 pointed out a potential optical illusion with the steering wheel's alignment, and @morganplus8 expressed disappointment about the luggage rack, noting that the boot space is adequate for luggage without it. Overall, while the car received a lot of praise, there were constructive suggestions for improvement.
|
 |
Positive: Many commentators expressed appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its uniqueness and the effort that has gone into customizing it. @Kerkenides notably praised it as a 'nice rig' and acknowledged the time and resources invested in collecting the expensive parts and installation. @pauljayallen (The Seller) further reinforced this sentiment by stating it is a 'beaut' and a 'blast to own', indicating a strong personal attachment to the vehicle. Additionally, @pauljayallen provided detailed descriptions of the new features and modifications, presenting the vehicle as a well-maintained and interesting option for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several users sought additional information about the vehicle, indicating an interest in understanding more about its specifics. @Affepaffe asked about the manufacturing year and service details, while @captaink inquired about the back seat space and insurance rates. @pauljayallen (The Seller) promptly responded to these inquiries with accurate information, including details about the vehicle's manufacturing year (1999) and confirming the fuel tank size. These interactions reflect an engaged community looking for clarity on the vehicle, contributing to an informative atmosphere around the listing.
Negative: However, there were a few concerns raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding the air conditioning system. @Affepaffe and @captaink both asked about potential issues and the cost of repairs necessary for the air conditioner, which @pauljayallen confirmed is currently non-functional and requires a new electric compressor. This acknowledgment of a known issue could deter some buyers who might be wary of potential repair costs. Overall, while there is enthusiasm about the vehicle, the mention of existing problems suggests a need for caution among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Valkyrja describes the vehicle as a pretty nice truck for a project, suggesting that it should not be too difficult to restore it for use on trails. @Just_me appreciates the aesthetics of the truck, specifically highlighting that it has the best-looking grille according to their opinion. Overall, these comments indicate a level of enthusiasm for the vehicle's potential and design.
Neutral: @DancingRabbit brought up some observations regarding the presence of several sticks in the cab and sought clarification on their purposes, especially in relation to the shifter. @kconnor123 commented on the vehicle's features, pointing out that the dual levers are for a Twin Stick transfer case, explaining the functionality for both high/low and 2wd/4wd. @KJLaBry noted the relatively low cost of replacing a distributor and discussed the possibility of the last shifter being a PTO, along with mentioning visible issues like corrosion in the undercarriage photos.
Negative: Several comments raised concerns about the distributor's condition, with @mbrovender emphasizing the risks associated with distributor damage potentially affecting the vehicle's running capacity due to its connection with the oil pump and cam. @KJLaBry pointed out that the truck might have had a PTO at one time, but mentioned the absence of the drive shaft and PTO gearbox based on the photos. @Joclark (The Seller) explained the backstory of the stuck distributor and provided details about the vehicle’s current condition, mentioning that although the truck rolls freely, there is uncertainty about the missing PTO and previous issues with the distributor.
|
 |
Positive: @owlshadows (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a well-maintained Toyota, having been the second owner since 2010. The truck has new rear shocks and four new Yokohama GeoLander tires, installed in December. The seller emphasizes transparency and aims to pass the truck on to someone who will need a reliable vehicle. @Fitzroya appreciates the PreRunner model for its better gas mileage and low maintenance, praising the truck's overall condition and color. The presence of new components and protective floor liners further highlights the seller's commitment to keeping the truck in good shape.
Neutral: Some commenters, like @VioletPearl and @yardbird221, inquired about service invoices and California smog compliance. @owlshadows confirmed that the truck passed smog without issues and clarified that he does not smoke and doesn't believe the previous owner did either. There were additional comments about the vehicle's features, such as missing skid plates, and a note on CarFax indicating a potential change in ownership due to a move to California. @GHROHRS also asked about the vehicle's gas mileage, which @owlshadows estimated to be around 20 to 21 mpg on regular gas.
Negative: @owlshadows acknowledged the damage to the right rear quarter panel caused by a parking incident, but assured potential buyers that it was a superficial scrape and the panel was replaced at a body shop. Despite some typical wear like clear coat failure mentioned by @Fitzroya, the seller is upfront about maintenance findings, including minor oil seepage noted in the recent inspection, though he reassured that the truck does not leak fluids. Potential buyers may have concerns regarding these minor issues as mentioned in the comments.
|
 |
Positive: @4WHEEL_GERMAN provided a prompt response to requests for additional visuals, with promises of uploaded videos shortly. Commentators like @LSU2020 complimented the vehicle’s maintenance and appearance, highlighting it as a beautiful wagon. Additionally, @BENZach shared a positive personal experience with a similar V70 model, expressing enthusiasm about the current listing and potential bidding.
Neutral: The discussion surrounding the vehicle also included clarifications regarding its condition. @4WHEEL_GERMAN addressed inquiries about the CarFax report, affirming that the damage reported was due to minor scratches rather than severe accidents, aiming to reassure potential bidders. @Dake raised a general concern about the reliability of CarFax reports, suggesting that the vehicle's history might be misleading, which echoes sentiments shared by others like @LSU2020 regarding the nature of the damage reported.
Negative: Concerns were raised about inconsistencies in the vehicle’s features, especially regarding the claimed presence of a third row of seats. Commentators like @BENZach and @Old_Ned pointed out discrepancies in the features list and the absence of evidence for the third row, leading to skepticism about the vehicle's advertising. @4WHEEL_GERMAN ultimately confirmed the error, stating there was no third row seating, which further highlighted potential misrepresentation in the listing.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its attractiveness and impressive history. @Trailboss simply commented, 'Nice, just nice Boss!!!' while @DENWERKS noted, 'I love the 1969 Boss 30, I think they are the best looking out of the 2.' Additionally, @Gasguy appreciated the car's aesthetic by stating, 'Beautiful Boss. A lot of cfm for that displacement.' Commenters also recognized the documentation associated with the vehicle, with @DENWERKS stating, 'loving all that original documentation.'
Neutral: There was a significant amount of discussion about the vehicle’s history, specifically regarding its color and engine specifications. @65corvette396 suggested relying on the Eminger report for historical accuracy, indicating a preference for original documentation. Meanwhile, @DClary raised a question regarding the vehicle's block, asking whether it is a Boss block or a replacement. @Misterz11b (The Seller) responded to various inquiries, offering additional details about the engine number and acknowledging comments from other users. @Gopher428 asked about the vehicle's original wheels, indicating that the BOSS typically came with argent-colored Mag 500s but provided an opportunity for discussion about variations.
Negative: Some negative comments focused on ambiguities and concerns regarding the vehicle's original features and parts. @Carzz pointed out that Marti reports are not always reliable, sharing an anecdote about inaccuracies in their own report. @Dicko66 expressed skepticism about the original color, stating that it's 'unusual for a 69 boss to be white/blue,' contrasting the popular belief that most had black interiors. Furthermore, @shelbymann70 questioned the authenticity of the door data plate, suggesting it could be a reproduction, which raised concerns among commenting enthusiasts. Additionally, @mavrick70 inquired about the vehicle's maintenance details, emphasizing the need for each component's originality for interested buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Mhouston8 commented positively on the fuel tank, expressing that it is an awesome idea, while @MJockey found the vehicle's build visually appealing with nice craftsmanship. Additionally, @Pboyrocks64 (The Seller) expressed gratitude for the feedback received, highlighting the engagement with potential buyers.
Neutral: @bobgiant24 inquired about the original motor specifications, specifically asking for the cubic inches, indicating a curiosity about the vehicle's performance aspects. @TommytheCat307 drew attention to the belt drive feature, suggesting interest in its mechanics without a specified opinion. @Pboyrocks64 (The Seller) addressed the question about the original engine, confirming that it was a 350 and mentioning issues with the speedometer that had yet to be fixed.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments present in the discussion; however, @Pboyrocks64 (The Seller) did note that the speedometer he received was defective, which could reflect a concern regarding the vehicle's readiness for sale. This indicates potential issues that may need addressing before it can meet buyer expectations.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received favorable remarks for its driving experience. @omidathari (The Seller) highlights that the car drives precisely and predictably, embodying Toyota's reputation for reliability and performance. @brakeservo enthusiastically shares their pleasure with a similar model, emphasizing its quality and the joy of driving, stating it provides a great experience whether the top is down or up. Many comments also reflect a sense of excitement and appreciation for the convertible aspect of the vehicle, with @CurtisTyota expressing curiosity about how these convertibles drive, linking it to fun experiences with other vehicles like the S2000.
Neutral: Several comments inquire about the car's features and history, with @Ya-Man and @caymanandwent questioning the reasons behind the quick resale of the vehicle after only two months. @omidathari (The Seller) provides detailed answers regarding the car's condition and maintenance history, admitting that while he bought the car on impulse and has enjoyed it, he has other projects competing for his attention. Additionally, comments about air conditioning services and brake inspections were clarified, indicating a well-maintained vehicle overall.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the vehicle's quick turnover, which @Ya-Man and @oxfletch have noted, suggesting that the frequency of resales may seem suspicious. @caymanandwent also noted past emissions issues, adding uncertainty about its potential to pass smog tests in California despite previous work done. Though @omidathari (The Seller) mentions recent repairs and improvements, he admits to uncertainty regarding the vehicle's emissions performance, which leaves potential buyers questioning its reliability in this area.
|
 |
Positive: @StephenBell highlighted the unique blue interior of the W211/S211, calling it pretty cool. @RayOliver praised the vehicle's lovely color combination, while @Dollycat3 mentioned the gorgeous and rare Pacific Blue leather interior. @Jstarr70 playfully suggested that living in this vehicle, termed 'Mercmansion,' offers an affordable alternative to a sprinter van. Overall, many commentators appreciated the vehicle's wining aesthetic features and distinctive color palette.
Neutral: @1600VeloceAssist, the seller, provided detailed information about the auction process and the vehicle's condition, ensuring transparency for potential buyers. Comments from users like @mlowengrub and @Josedluca raised questions about specific functions and features such as the air suspension and rear seat AC controllers. Other inquiries included requests for close-up images of certain components and verification of any issues, demonstrating a constructive approach to understanding the vehicle's condition before bidding.
Negative: There were some concerns noted by users about possible mechanical issues. @D2_S8_Daily asked why the valve cover gaskets, recently replaced, might be leaking oil again, and @jrb007 discussed the troublesome history of air shocks, cautioning that they require careful maintenance. @Josedluca pointed out significant rust on the undercarriage. Meanwhile, @Boatymcboatface commented on the preference for the half-removed Airmatic system, expressing dissatisfaction with modifications that compromise the vehicle’s original comfort features.
|
 |
Positive: @Jackson24 describes the car as beautiful, questioning whether the wooden dash panels were inserted post-purchase, as most models typically feature aluminum inserts. @Lox (The Seller) has provided a link to additional photos and expresses confidence in the original condition of the vehicle, confirming it is indeed an XKR. @Lox (The Seller) appreciates the positive engagement and comments about the car, describing it as immaculate and sharing a walk-around video.
Neutral: @Pheel inquires about the absence of backup cameras in the 2010 model, to which @Jackson24 confirms that it just has a backup beeper. @Lox (The Seller) agrees with this and mentions that while a backup camera wasn't included, it can be added afterwards. Additionally, @earlebird references a Carfax report listing the vehicle as an R model, which @Lox (The Seller) supports by explaining that some features, like the embroidery on seats, were optional.
Negative: @lodette1 expresses skepticism about the authenticity of the car as a real R model, not having seen one without the R embroidery on the seats or dash, citing the absence of visual indicators except on the trunk. This concern is met with clarification from @SCMike, who refers to the VIN's digits to confirm the model type, which should put those doubts to rest. @Lox (The Seller) acknowledges the concerns and reaffirms the originality of the model, but the shadow of uncertainty remains over the embroidery and the required documentation.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described positively, with @Collectibleclassics noting that the radio has been repaired and installed, functioning flawlessly. Additionally, comments from @MonsterJoe and @habanerott highlight the strength of the V12 engine and the car's good condition, particularly its exterior and underside, suggesting it has been well maintained despite its mileage and age. The dealership also promotes its commitment to a transparent sales process, boasting a high rating of 4.9/5.0 from customer reviews, and offers various services for buyers, showcasing their dedication to customer satisfaction and vehicle quality.
Neutral: Several comments express curiosity about the vehicle's history and auction timeline. @gscharnagl questions the quick sale, noticing the vehicle's recent auction activity, while @msoupp points out concerns regarding the leather seat condition relative to mileage. @Collectibleclassics provides clarifications on the ownership history and inspection results, detailing substantial maintenance work done on the vehicle that indicates ongoing effort to ensure its reliability and performance.
Negative: Despite the positive notes, there are concerns from various commenters about the vehicle's condition and some inconsistencies in its maintenance history. @gscharnagl is skeptical of the timeline for the vehicle's servicing, and @nonametotell mentions oddities in the Carfax records related to brake maintenance despite the car's low mileage, raising doubts about its prior care. Furthermore, @Amaxi expresses disbelief regarding the leather seat condition, questioning the vehicle's overall quality given the stated mileage.
|
 |
Positive: @JohnChecki described the vehicle as "beautiful," highlighting its aesthetics. @BMWE90Guy expressed love for the car's gorgeous appearance and praised the specification, noting disappointment over the discontinuation of the XJ model. Collectibleclassics (The Seller) emphasized their commitment to providing unique and desirable vehicles, showcasing their positive reputation with a high Google Review rating and an assurance of smooth transactions.
Neutral: @wbg62851 inquired whether the Jaguar Leaper hood ornament was a factory addition or aftermarket, while @CKart showed appreciation for the Leaper on newer models. However, @Tom_R. disagreed, mentioning that it looked out of place on the car's design. Collectibleclassics (The Seller) acknowledged both opinions regarding the ornament and reassured that it should not leave any damage if removed, indicating a willingness to accommodate buyer preferences.
Negative: @hjanac raised concerns about a potential oil consumption issue due to blue smoke observed during a cold start in a video. In response, Collectibleclassics (The Seller) clarified that the smoke was merely condensation caused by cold weather. @ralph569 pointed out a stain on the door armrest in one of the photos, to which the Seller responded that it appeared to be dirt that could be cleaned, expressing uncertainty due to weather conditions.
|
 |
Positive: Many users appreciate the specific features of the truck, particularly the towing mirrors, which @Drewmac43 (The Seller) emphasizes are Ford OEM and designed for better visibility when towing. @T_McCool compliments the aesthetic by noting that red looks great on these trucks, expressing his enthusiasm with a friendly sentiment. Additionally, @Drewmac43 offers clear explanations about the axle codes and the truck's mechanics, showcasing transparency and helpfulness in addressing potential buyers' questions.
Neutral: @Drewmac43 (The Seller) provides direct answers to inquiries about the truck's condition and specifications, such as confirming that both fuel tanks and pumps are operational. He also responds to @ashmanfish's question regarding past damage noted on the Carfax, admitting he is unaware of details since it predates his ownership. Other inquiries involve requests for additional photographs and videos to assess the condition of the vehicle more thoroughly, which @Drewmac43 is willing to accommodate despite the cold weather conditions.
Negative: There are concerns regarding the truck's past as potential buyers like @ashmanfish question the nature of the Carfax damage. Furthermore, @rdnck1 raises issues about rust in the bed, indicating a desire for more clarity about possible structural problems. @Chocook's comment about the truck's low mileage over a long period adds an air of skepticism about its usage history, suggesting buyers might be wary without adequate answers or documentation.
|
 |
Positive: @AZSkye expresses enthusiasm about the stunning appearance of the brand new 2023 Escalade V, noting its unique color compared to the typical black models. Other commenters like @bbrown2023 echo this sentiment, sharing their positive experiences with the Escalade V and acknowledging its capabilities. @Maysrem, the seller, confirms that the vehicle has been stored in climate-controlled conditions and reassures potential buyers that it is essentially a used, new vehicle, offering a great opportunity at a reduced price.
Neutral: @jrahawkins and @Showerfan raise questions about the low mileage of the vehicle and its history, curious about the reasons behind so few miles driven. @Dstock66 inquires about the installation and potential recalls for the engine, while @LayNout comments on the MSRP of the vehicle, indicating some shock at its high retail price. Both @ggross and @belairlover ask about the bubbling in the PPF and if it can be repaired before the delivery, highlighting a shared interest in the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Commenters like @taylo025 express concern about the depreciation of the Escalade, while @BrokenAdam discusses the lack of videos about specific features. Concerns are raised about the bubbling on the PPF, with both @ggross and @belairlover questioning its implications. @Dstock66 further probes about the installation of the PPF, indicating skepticism about the vehicle's upkeep. Overall, there are some apprehensions regarding quality and maintenance that potential buyers are keen to clarify.
|
 |
Positive: The 2021 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500KR Coupe has received several positive remarks, highlighting its stunning appearance and powerful performance. Commentors like @Plywood222222 expressed that the car looks and sounds fantastic, stating it is their dream car and that it made their day to see such a vehicle. @deanbalthaser referred to the GT500KR as a 'great Shelby hotrod,' reinforcing the admiration for the model. Overall, the car's presentation by @1600veloce and the attention given to its details have also been praised, making a compelling case for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commentors sought clarification on certain aspects of the GT500KR, indicating curiosity and engagement with the listing. @Slandry002 asked whether the vehicle was a factory GT500 or a Shelby-converted model, to which @1600veloce confirmed its conversion status and provided additional information about its limited availability. Meanwhile, @Elduque inquired about the 'King of the Road' option, and @supersnake427 asked questions regarding seat configurations, showcasing active interest in the vehicle's specifications. These inquiries suggest potential buyers are attentive to the finer details of the car's offerings and conversion features.
Negative: While the overall feedback has been largely positive, a few concerns were raised about the car. @BigCanoe suggested that the brake and gas pedals needed further cleaning, pointing out a minor drawback in the presentation. @supersnake427 expressed disappointment regarding potential imperfections, including a scratch on the hood pin and asked whether the back seat came with it. Additionally, @Wideopenfab questioned the decision to send a factory CFTP car for a KR conversion, indicating it might not have been the best choice given the alterations made. These comments reflect a critical perspective that some potential buyers may have regarding the car's condition and modification choices.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments praise the vehicle for its exceptional build quality and craftsmanship. @PhilO describes the car as 'beautiful,' while @Aonarch exclaims that it is 'absolutely wild' and expresses love for the design. @3_pedal_guy recalls fond memories of owning a similar model, appreciating the functionality of the flares and their contribution to performance. Commenters like @Comrade_TG commend the craftsmanship, emphasizing the amount of skill involved in creating such a unique vehicle, and @Breezejammer shares their enjoyment of the auction video, calling it a 'great video.'
Neutral: Discussion around the vehicle includes inquiries about its specifications and features. @PhilO asks about the front/rear weight distribution, curious about its potential differences from the stock balance. @Notanothermiata and @SafetyFaster engage in a conversation regarding seat belt harnesses, sharing thoughts on their legality and performance. Questions regarding the car's emissions compliance and street legality are asked, with @FOCOcustoms (The Seller) confirming that it is street legal and emissions compliant, adding clarity to potential buyers' concerns about regulations and engineering details.
Negative: On the other hand, certain comments reflect hesitations or concerns. @thechewu inquires about road legality and potential issues with emissions, hinting at a broader skepticism regarding modified vehicles. Suggestions that the car's weight is heavier than expected, raised by @Comrade_TG, indicate a confusion about its build weight, with some believing it should be lighter based on typical models. Additionally, @hlweeks1 questions the legality of the emissions sticker due to the vehicle's age, suggesting a need for further clarification from the seller regarding compliance with state regulations.
|
 |
Positive: @bhoffma1 expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, calling it a 'Sweet Acty!' and wishing good luck on the auction. This positive sentiment indicates that the commenter appreciates the vehicle's design and condition. Additionally, @JDMcarsFL confirmed the air conditioning is working and uses R134 coolant, which may enhance the vehicle's appeal to potential buyers who desire a comfortable driving experience.
Neutral: @ScotwithoneT inquired about shipping options for transport from Florida to New York, suggesting he might need assistance with logistics. @BranSwan asked if the vehicle could be licensed for public road use, with @JDMcarsFL responding that it is street legal in Florida but advised checking local DMV regulations due to varying state laws. @12cilindriFF questioned the type of air conditioning fluid used, seeking clarification about the vehicle's cooling system that the seller promptly addressed.
Negative: @DrRocket raised a concern regarding what appeared to be a 'bug smudge' or a chip in the windshield visible in the driving video, indicating potential oversight in the vehicle's presentation. @Chelmreich made a critical remark about another bidder's max bid, implying that the bidding process was unprofessional or lacking effort. This suggests a negative sentiment surrounding the bidding experience rather than the vehicle itself.
|
 |
Positive: @amotorsports (The Seller) highlights that the Porsche Boxster features low mileage, a manual transmission, and tasteful modifications that enhance the driving experience. The comprehensive set of photos uploaded shows full transparency regarding the car's condition, making it appealing to potential buyers. The seller also appreciates constructive engagement and informs bidders about the vehicle's quality, stating it runs and drives as it should, with no leaks, which suggests a well-cared-for vehicle that is ready for a new owner.
Neutral: Comments from @700HPWagon and @AbarthEsq inquire about the tint on the windshield, demonstrating interest in specific features of the vehicle, such as the percentage of window tint. @mrmeyer4irm seeks clarification on the relevance of 'Cold Start' videos, while @vwlove54 and @SoGi provide a brief explanation of the IMS issue related to the Porsche Boxster, emphasizing that the IMS bearing is a crucial component that, if not maintained, can lead to significant engine problems. Overall, these inquiries and comments show an engaged audience seeking detailed information about the vehicle.
Negative: @bones302 expresses criticism regarding the vehicle's presentation, suggesting that rather than revving the engine during cold starts, actual cold start videos should be produced. Additionally, they point out a concerning rating of 3.2 for the dealer on Google, which raises questions about the seller's credibility. @GeorgeAlfa3 also raises a concern about the IMS issue and whether it has been addressed, reflecting buyer caution regarding potential technical problems with the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the aesthetic beauty and luxurious nature of the Lincoln Continental Mark III. @JaDawgPNW described the car as 'beautiful' and a 'classy ride', echoing sentiments expressed by @borninthe60s who praised the vehicle as '100% badass'. Commenters like @CarDogThreePedals lauded the current month for 'EPIC Lincolns', indicating the car’s status among collectors. The seller, @Competitioncars, receives appreciation for his transparent sales approach and for consistently bringing unique, high-quality cars to the market. The originality of the vehicle, including its color and features, is noted by several commentators, with @Electramanrob excited about the historic aspects such as documented original miles.
Neutral: Several comments provide helpful inquiries and observations regarding the vehicle's condition and specifications, reflecting a balanced curiosity. @Scott68GTO and @Electramanrob raised questions about the car's original equipment and functionality, particularly concerning the documented original miles and the status of features such as the AC. The seller has responded positively, pledging to provide detailed videos and clarifications to interested buyers, illustrating engagement with potential customers. Commenters are also pondering the origins and the value of the vehicle, seeking to understand how these low-mileage examples are sourced, as mentioned by @SwissBliss.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about the potential hidden issues associated with low-mileage vintage cars, particularly surrounding the car's service history. @Trigger1950 and @Scott_in_Dayton noted the absence of maintenance records and indicated that the vehicle might require significant investment to achieve road readiness, even if it looks appealing cosmetically. @Competitioncars, the seller, counters these concerns with an invitation for potential bidders to arrange pre-inspections and emphasizes that any necessary updates can be made without excessive costs, defending the condition of the car against skepticism.
|
 |
Positive: @amotorsports (The Seller) highlighted the Jeep's customization potential, emphasizing its appeal for buyers who appreciate personalized vehicles. The seller also acknowledged that while some modifications may not suit everyone's taste, they can add real value and save future owners from the hassle and cost of making such changes themselves. Additionally, buyers, including @mbz300sdl, inquired about the vehicle's functionality, to which @amotorsports confirmed that all features, including AC and heat, work correctly, and there are no unpleasant odors, indicating a well-maintained condition.
Neutral: Several commenters, such as @wpsimon3 and @mspaulding88, recognized the clean appearance of the Jeep despite mixed feelings about specific modifications like the grille. They noted that personal taste plays a significant role in vehicle modifications. There's also interest from potential buyers regarding the original components and the seller's plans for a driving video, showing that there is an engaged audience seeking further information about the Jeep before bidding.
Negative: However, there were critical remarks like those from @RWN525 and @IFGD, who expressed strong disapproval of the grille and suggested that removing certain modifications could significantly improve the Jeep's value. @IFGD even implied that the current setup may not maximize the selling potential. Additionally, there were concerns regarding the Jeep's repaint preparation and warnings such as the illuminated airbag light, which could pose issues for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the 1991 Cadillac Brougham being auctioned. @Bobai, the seller, highlights that the vehicle is in great shape and has been a source of enjoyment for them over the past two years, having been driven leisurely on Sunday ice cream trips. Many commenters express enthusiasm and admiration for the vehicle, with @moonfiresky noting the joy of these large cars and @Msasteel further acknowledging its beauty and elegance, although initially mistaking the tire style.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions about the vehicle's history and condition. @Calstickshift inquires if the car has been driven in snow, prompting @Bobai to clarify that it has not been driven in poor weather despite being moved out for photographs. @89lincolntc offers insights on selling vehicles, suggesting that fewer but more impactful photos can be beneficial, showing varied perspectives on car listings. Commenters also discuss technical details, such as engine specifications from @CarFoolLane and @john2551, providing additional context about the Cadillac's model years.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about the quality of the photographs included in the listing. @onebadlsc criticizes the need for better photography, implying that the current images may not do justice to the vehicle. @CarFoolLane agrees, commenting on the initial misunderstanding of the tire type based on wide shots, indicating potential confusion among potential buyers due to poor image quality. Overall, while the vehicle is appreciated, there are constructive criticisms about presentation that could enhance the auction experience.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed interest in the vehicle, appreciating its overall condition despite some minor concerns. @knockitoutluxurydetail, the seller, emphasized that the car drives well, runs very smoothly, and has fully functional features including a strong A/C and heat. There were assurances that the top does not leak, and the vehicle has been well-maintained with the braking system having received new pads recently. Commenters like @Tim_Everett shared positive personal experiences with similar models, suggesting that potential buyers will enjoy the car as much as they did.
Neutral: The seller and several users discussed the vehicle's minor damage, which included a scraped passenger side quarter panel. @knockitoutluxurydetail provided clarity on requests for service records, stating that while the bushings had not been replaced, the water pump and brake pads were serviced recently. There were inquiries regarding the functionality of the odometer, with @orw1 and @Kmicinski questioning its accuracy due to a lengthy period of static reading, and the seller affirmed that the mileage on the title is considered actual despite the confusion.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's history and maintenance arose, particularly regarding the timing belt and water pump service verifications. Commenters like @FMW1247 pointed out potential issues with the back seat and other cosmetic details, which contributed to skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition. The discussion also highlighted the perceived importance of transparency in the seller's responses, particularly regarding the odometer's status and previous damage history, leading some buyers to express hesitation about the purchase without clear documentation.
|
 |
Positive: @sToNeCLoSeR believes there is an unnecessary amount of negativity towards the vehicle on this platform, appreciating it instead as a 'BEAUTIFUL CAR!!!'. @boaboyoz describes the car as a 'distinctive delicious 992.2 Carrera 4 GTS' and praises its build quality, conveying excitement about the car's lively discussion around it. @RemingtonSR71 highlights the classy combination of the brown top with green paint, presenting it as a refreshing departure from more common color schemes for 911 models.
Neutral: @iLussoOC (The Seller) confirmed with the local Porsche dealer that the car includes the next four services, indicating that the vehicle is well maintained. @Cav1123 raises an inquiry about the car's three-owner history on its Carfax, suggesting a need for clarity regarding the vehicle’s background, while also commenting on the refreshing color combo. @ozinus points out a discrepancy in the build sheet regarding the cost of the Truffle brown leather interior, emphasizing that it may be valued at around 5K+, but still recognizes the beauty of the ride.
Negative: @Tigers196884 criticizes the lack of respect for sellers within the community, which reflects a concern about toxic behavior that can affect discussions about the vehicle. @gorejd remarks on a common practice where individuals hate on a car using alternate accounts to undermine competitors, warning followers to form their own opinions instead. @Fuelieguy, @newusername, and @cocomats had their comments flagged as non-constructive, indicating they may not have contributed positively to the discussion.
|
 |
Positive: @Sjalabais describes the vehicle as an absolutely spectacular find and appreciates its engine, likening it to his own model but acknowledging the low mileage as a significant feature. @Vtec4ever suggests that it could be a good daily driver, emphasizing the simplicity of its design before modern electronics took over. @SuddenlyEngineer believes a Genesis dealer should showcase the vehicle as a testament to Hyundai's progress over the past two decades, noting its status as a low mileage survivor. @CarFoolLane shares nostalgia for the model, recalling how Hyundai's reputation improved with this vehicle and praising its solid performance compared to early 2000s standards.
Neutral: @lasvegasmotorcars (The Seller) provides logistical details about the location of the vehicle and encourages interested parties to arrange for an inspection. The Seller elaborates on the vehicle's history, mentioning its origins in New Jersey, relocation to Nevada, and consistent garage storage, ensuring it remained rust-free. They also indicate that a full service was completed in early 2024 based on recommendations from a Hyundai dealer, with service invoices available for review. Multiple comments regarding the vehicle's manuals confirm that the current set does not include the original documents, and the seller is attempting to locate them for the potential buyer.
Negative: @problemchildauto reflects on their mixed feelings about the vehicle due to past experiences, expressing a sense of nostalgia mixed with concern over the car's reliability. @Corvettelovers comments on the absence of original books and manual documentation, questioning its history and implying a lack of completeness in the vehicle's sales information. @Sjalabais brings up the low rarity of the XG350 in the current market and hints at potential ownership issues, suggesting that they do not tend to remain with one owner for long periods.
|
4,200-Mile 2022 Mini Cooper John Cooper Works Iconic Convertible
WMW63DL04N3P11773
Lot 227026
Dealer
 |
Positive: @JLRStPete, the seller, expresses enthusiasm for the 2022 MINI Cooper John Cooper Works Iconic Convertible with only 4,200 miles, highlighting its vibrant color combination. He assures potential bidders that he will be actively involved throughout the auction process, ready to answer questions and provide additional media to ensure transparency. Commentators like @Tigers196884 praise the car's excellent condition and enjoyable driving experience, specifically reminiscing about how driving a similar model felt exhilarating.
Neutral: Inquiries regarding the vehicle's history were made by @dsands3 and @flflyer, focusing on the nature of the damage reported and questioning whether the vehicle has a clean title. @JLRStPete clarified that the car had a minor incident while parked, leading to cosmetic repairs, and reassured bidders that the title is clean—stating that the vehicle does not fall under salvage or branded title categories. @dragrace90 further requested information about the presence of a reserve on the auction, indicating interest in the auction process.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the damage disclosed to the vehicle, with @flflyer implying potential value depreciation associated with salvage titles. @JLRStPete responded to these worries by providing detailed information on the repair costs and the professional handling of the incident. Despite the clarifications, the initial apprehension surrounding the car's history indicates potential hesitance among some bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 highlights the potential of resurrecting the 122 wagon to its full glory, expressing excitement for the project. @Shawh sees the car as an awesome project, imagining it with a red interior and wishing the best for the consigner. @austin_alfa perceives these vehicles as ideal for vacation homes, noting their reliability and fun factor. They appreciate the unique character and value retention of these cars. @RCLAR1 shares their own experience with a similar vehicle they restored, emphasizing the enjoyment of driving and parts availability. Overall, many commenters appreciate the nostalgia and potential that the vehicle represents.
Neutral: @TarltonVintageAutos asks for better photos of the car's underside, which indicates concern about the condition but does not reflect negativity. @Old_Ned mentions the possibility of local sale and hopes the car gets completed instead of parted out. @Rodster544 shares thoughts of potential modifications and acknowledges their personal project status. @bfflyers points out the specifics of the vehicle’s features and condition, noting both strengths and concerns. @RCP inquires about the functionality of doors and the state of the rust, demonstrating interest in the car's practical aspects.
Negative: In contrast, @TarltonVintageAutos’s request for clearer underside pictures suggests that there might be hidden concerns regarding the vehicle’s condition. @RCP prompts about rust spots, implying potential issues encountered during inspection. Furthermore, @Spinedork (The Seller) mentions struggles with uploading details and acknowledges the time constraints affecting their ability to restore the vehicle. @bfflyers questions the condition of the tailgate, pointing out possible previous bodywork that might worry prospective buyers. Overall, while the community shares hope for the vehicle's future, some express concerns about the restoration challenges it presents.
|
 |
Positive: Comments from @ttv566 highlight the popularity and functionality of the vehicle, noting its efficient use of space and practicality. They appreciate design features like the flat-folding rear seats and the ability to switch off the all-wheel drive for better fuel economy, while expressing enjoyment in the vehicle's current color. @JDMcarsFL is actively engaging with potential buyers, providing quick responses to queries about the vehicle's condition and features, demonstrating a willingness to ensure transparency about the sale. @PMUZI’s inquiries about the servicing and 4WD functionality were answered affirmatively, indicating that the seller is optimistic about the vehicle’s operational status.
Neutral: Several comments highlight curiosity around the vehicle's history and background. @letthegypsyhaveit asks whether the car is an import from Japan, to which @JDMcarsFL confirms that it is, showcasing the vehicle's international pedigree. @MrPink99 inquired about the origin of the paint job, showing a desire for clarity on potential maintenance or customization. Others like @DocJr are interested in the necessary documentation for title transfer, exemplifying practical concerns from users contemplating purchase. The exchange demonstrates a flow of information between the seller and buyers, with @Baur2002 seeking clarification about what appeared to be an exhaust issue but later recognized it as surface rust instead, showcasing the importance of accurate information in the sales process.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding @Baur2002 pointing out what seemed to be a 'glaring imperfection,' specifically a 'giant hole' in the exhaust, which raised questions about potential obligations for repair before the auction ends. Additionally, @Raven888 mentions issues with the plastic headlights, calling them a common problem during winter, indicating potential long-term care challenges. The comments from @Swampmama about strange noises during the test drive further suggest there may be operational quirks or mechanical issues that need addressing, hinting at the complexities of the vehicle that could deter prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @dbrippen reports that the vehicle is a reliable daily driver, regularly driven about 5 to 10 miles a week. It garners attention and positive comments from onlookers, which seems to be a significant advantage for potential buyers. @dbrippen also mentions that all necessary maintenance has been conducted on time, ensuring essential fluids were replaced within the last year, and driving on highways for extended periods has not been a test he has conducted personally.
Neutral: Several commenters, like @shadylane and @Alfetta70s, inquire about the vehicle's purposes, such as whether it's suitable for daily driving or serves more as a project vehicle. Questions also arise regarding its shipping logistics and potential long drives. @dbrippen responds with thoughtful details, addressing maintenance questions while clarifying limitations about highway trips. He also acknowledges the vehicle's dirty but undercoated frame, which impacts its aesthetic but is less concerning in terms of functionality.
Negative: Criticism is present in comments from users like @phavriluk, who expresses disbelief over the car's superficial features, indicating a lack of depth in selling points. @Fastlotus highlights concerns regarding the corrosion noted on the frame, visualizing issues that might affect structural integrity, while @Kamplak1 notes signs that could imply body mount replacements are needed, which is seen as a potential red flag yet not a complete deal breaker. Such comments indicate that there are significant aesthetic and structural concerns that some potential buyers may want to consider thoroughly.
|
 |
Positive: @Surf praises the 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL550 4MATIC as the last model featuring a reliable naturally aspirated V8 engine, reflecting on the excellent performance of their own 2008 model. They describe it as the best big SUV they have ever owned, noting that it has successfully taken them across the country multiple times with pets and gear in tow. Another user, @JEasley, agrees with @Surf about the engine's durability and highlights this vehicle as a prime example of the X164 series.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics, the seller, introduces their business as a high-volume dealership dedicated to providing unique and desirable vehicles from private sellers. They emphasize their commitment to smooth and transparent transactions, backed by a strong Google rating of 4.9 and numerous 5-star reviews. The seller also welcomes potential buyers to schedule inspections and visit their location, offering additional services like nationwide shipping and storage.
Negative: Commenters such as @tesoffice humorously suggest the vehicle would be fitting for a retired UPS driver, which could imply a stereotype about the vehicle's image. @noncommittal, appearing unsure, asks about the specific functions of the vehicle's seat controller and later inquires about whether the steering wheel is heated, suggesting a lack of familiarity or confidence in the product.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 1992 Dodge Viper RT/10, highlighting its status as a unique and desirable vehicle. @Chiroluke noted the car's potential for generating attention, referencing its historical significance as one of the first Vipers produced. @ILLMAX1 commented on the car's fantastic design and collectible nature, suggesting that its limited availability makes it highly valuable. Additionally, @Jeepmike shared a positive experience with his own Viper, emphasizing the joy of driving it and attracting attention, while @25ovem echoed a mantra of driving and enjoying such rare cars, asserting that they retain their allure and appearance over time.
Neutral: The comments also revealed practical inquiries and observations about the Viper's condition and features. @SOK2 raised questions about the functionality of the gauges and potential issues with the fuel gauge, while @ACRSNK asked for documentation related to the car's history. (The Seller) @Collectibleclassics responded to these queries by assuring that the fuel gauge is functioning properly and that there is no significant paintwork done on the vehicle. Additionally, the discussion about air conditioning in the vehicle was addressed, with mixed responses highlighting that while early Vipers had HVAC controls, they did not come with air conditioning as a standard feature during their initial year.
Negative: However, there were also concerns noted by some commenters about the car's condition and potential repairs needed. @SOK2 mentioned the age of the tires and the high cost of fixing the fuel gauge, which was contested by other users like @Surffly. Additionally, @Mph48 raised a serious question about the car's frame appearing welded in pictures, which prompted a defensive response from @Jeepmike, criticizing the negative implication. Overall, these concerns reflect the apprehension some potential buyers might feel when considering such a high-value classic car.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg commented positively on the appearance of the vehicle, describing the GTC as a great-looking car and extending best wishes. @Bordeaux expressed appreciation for the owner's commitment to regular maintenance, noting the impressive service history detailed in the Carfax report. They highlighted the joy of driving such a valuable car daily and wished the seller luck and the future owner enjoyment. Additionally, @Tripledigit reminisced about their own experience with the same model, praising the driving experience and aesthetic of the car, asserting that it had incredible presence and appointments.
Neutral: @benster (The Seller) provided an overview of the vehicle's maintenance history, listing numerous dealer services performed over the years from 2007 to 2025, ensuring potential buyers understand the car has been well cared for. They also mentioned several costed options and features that enhance the car's appeal, such as Birds Eye Maple trim and massage seats. The Seller noted the positive attributes of the car, including its convertible functionality and the recent installation of OEM parts for optimal performance.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are overwhelmingly impressed with the car's build quality and aesthetics. @SlowNRusty described it as "9.3L of fury" and noted that it comes with an impressive engine. @skydweller highlighted that the C2 is likely terrifying at wide-open throttle, which just adds to its appeal. Many praised the overall beauty of the build, with @Biglinda referring to it as a "beautiful build" and @GTRene echoing the sentiment by calling it a lovely build. @joabei11 pointed out the addition of a built-in radar detector as a significant feature, further underscoring its customization. The sheer power proposed by the vehicle, with estimates pushing up to 900 HP, has certainly raised many eyebrows and sparked interest among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific details regarding the vehicle's specifications and performance metrics. @davenichols (The Seller) engaged with these queries by providing insights about the car's features and the importation process. He mentioned the ease of bringing the car into the U.S. and the associated costs with a customs broker. @Chewy142 asked about additional interior photos and details about the motor build, which indicates a general curiosity for transparency in the auction process. Moreover, the discussion around the VIN tag attachment method by @shootnride revealed a nuanced concern for potential buyers regarding registration challenges in various jurisdictions, showing that while the car is magnificent, some buyers are considering practical implications.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about potential issues related to the car's registration due to the alternative attachment method of the VIN tag, as discussed by @shootnride. He mentioned that this could create complications when registering the car in certain states. Additionally, @dixienormous expressed concerns about the likelihood of overheating given the car's powerful setup. The fragility of the paint and body due to its age was also noted by a commentator who reminded prospective buyers that while the car has undergone extensive restoration, it is still fundamentally an older vehicle and requires careful handling. Such points indicate that while there is a strong excitement about the vehicle, potential buyers are aware of possible pitfalls and are considering these factors seriously.
|
 |
Positive: @lnewcome praised the vehicle as a beautiful example of the Mercedes model, appreciating its aesthetics. @genevamotorscars (The Seller) provided a road test video and confirmed the car's original tires were in good shape, offering to mount and balance new tires if the buyer chooses. Additionally, the car was described as having zero smoke or other odors, appearing like new throughout, which was confirmed by @SailtheBOC who expressed interest in the car's condition.
Neutral: Several comments focused on questions regarding the vehicle's features and history. @GSN inquired about the original tires and the presence of a heated steering wheel. @SailtheBOC asked about the number of keys and service history, while @NCMURPHY inquired about a spare tire and requested trunk photos. @genevamotorscars (The Seller) responded promptly to queries, indicating warranty options and confirming features to potential buyers, including that the air suspension was in excellent condition and that there was no presence of USB ports but a Mercedes Connector instead.
Negative: @goranywork raised concerns about the vehicle's service history based on the limited records available in the Carfax report, indicating the possibility that the original owner may have delayed essential maintenance like oil changes for many years. This was echoed by @joaol, who felt it was odd for a Mercedes dealership not to report service. Both commenters highlighted a perceived lack of proper oil maintenance and insisted on clarity regarding the service history; @Jimbob123 noted that he had observed similar negligence with another family member's vehicle, adding to the doubts surrounding this car's upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and unique characteristics. @RiffRaff described it as a pretty bike from the Golden Age of Bar-Hoppers, while @broncoBob (The Seller) noted that the bike has been well-preserved in a private collection, emphasizing its lack of paint chips and corrosion. @johnnyb11 also complimented the bike, mentioning a video he saw of people enjoying similar models in Thailand, which he found appealing. Overall, the bike seems to be well-regarded for its visual appeal and current condition.
Neutral: Several commenters sought more information about the vehicle's specifications and sale details. @Berserker619 asked about the originality of the tires, while @Cyrusmc1947 inquired about the bore and stroke measurements, which @broncoBob provided, confirming a square motor design. @eaanderson asked if this was a private party or dealer sale, to which @broncoBob clarified it was a private sale located in Mansfield, Texas. Additionally, there were technical questions regarding the carburetor model, which @broncoBob also answered, leading to a discussion on the Mikuni flat slide carb.
Negative: Some comments hinted at potential concerns with the vehicle, such as @Trucking questioning why the front brakes felt soft, suggesting that there might be mechanical issues worth investigating. Additionally, @craZee humorously commented on their own physical limits in terms of riding the bike for six miles, which while lighthearted, indicates a daunting view on usability. Overall, while the comments were mostly positive, there were some reservations about technical aspects that could affect the riding experience.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its unique features and history. @dasj199 praised the aesthetic appeal of the Model A, noting the classic mildly hot rodded look offered by the 1935 wheels. @Mandinga reflected on the impressive longevity of the car, emphasizing its nearly 100-year existence as a testament to its endurance and character. Furthermore, @ButWhatDoIKnow commented positively on the car's interesting color and potential, suggesting that it could benefit from a little tender loving care, which shows a recognition of the car's charm despite its age.
Neutral: There were also some neutral inquiries and observations regarding the vehicle's specifications and history. @BikerWilly asked about the chassis and engine details, seeking clarification on whether the body was from an earlier model while the engine might have been replaced. @Davey_Jones contributed a practical perspective on wheel options and their impact on driving, discussing the comparative advantages of 21-inch versus 16-inch wheels, which underlines the customization aspect of the Model A community. Other users like @Goodwisky inquired about accessories like the side curtains and top cover, suggesting a continued interest in maintaining the car's completeness.
Negative: Conversely, some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's current state and maintenance needs. @tpahjim expressed a critical viewpoint about the car's turquoise color, stating it was hideous and suggested it might serve better as an undercoat. Moreover, concerns about performance and usability were hinted at, as @Davey_Jones described experiences with different wheel sizes affecting off-road capability, suggesting that the original 21-inch wheels provided better traction in certain situations. Overall, while appreciation was evident, there were also voices of caution regarding the car's maintenance and operational choices reflecting the complexities of owning a vintage vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @JAY-Z described the vehicle as reliable and enjoyable, noting its superb handling that allows for high-speed cornering. @clwarkentin expressed a fondness for the car, reminiscing about his experience with similar models and appreciating the design. @captain008174, the seller, highlighted the delightful experience of picking the car up from the Porsche Factory and noted the car's fun driving experience, even being praised by his son who owns more exotic vehicles. The seller stated the car runs excellently and has been meticulously cared for, including regular maintenance like the timing belt replacement in 1994.
Neutral: @Roadboss mentioned the car's interesting provenance, being picked up in Stuttgart. @iambhooper raised points about common issues like dash cracking and the condition of fuel lines, suggesting maintenance precautions for potential buyers. @Spokayman informed other commenters that the 1984 model had standard power steering, and the seller responded to inquiries about the car's condition and modifications, such as the A/C system, reaffirming that the essential systems are fully operational and the seals were updated during the last repainting in 2015.
Negative: While the seller, @captain008174, addressed concerns about the timing belt's age, commenters like @Spokayman and @lawmaw22 warned about potential long-term problems due to outdated belts, emphasizing the importance of replacing them to avoid severe engine damage. @Dinodino cautioned about a potential radiator leak, which can lead to costly repairs and advised against driving the car significant distances in its current state. Additionally, concerns about the dash cracking and the seat covers raised by @iambhooper highlighted issues typical for older models, which could affect buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @rbf120 mentioned that the vehicle looks Nice in Black, which suggests an appealing aesthetic. @AlfistiNYC considers this car a great candidate for restoration, with replaceable parts and a few necessary updates, appreciating the potential of the model. @stathios (The Seller) emphasizes the car’s charm as a classic European vehicle, hinting at its suitability for casual drives and summer outings, and thinks it could be a great entry point into classic motoring.
Neutral: @lovecars pointed out that the interior upholstery appears to have been modified from the original vinyl to leather, sparking a conversation about its authenticity, while @bringatrailer confirmed the listing has been updated regarding upholstery details. @watry discussed general characteristics of Alfa transmissions, noting that the issues with the second gear are common and could be managed by driving techniques, and @jaybird_57 mentioned the possibility of rebuilding the transmission if necessary, reflecting a common sentiment among those familiar with older models.
Negative: @MagML raised concerns about specific noise issues from the transmission during shifting, indicating a potential need for mechanical attention. @stathios acknowledged this input, admitting that the transmission does have quirks typical of a 40-year-old vehicle and that it may not perform perfectly at full freeway speeds. The discussion about the condition of the vehicle's transmission hints at an underlying apprehension about reliability, alongside comments from @watry cautioning that if not rebuilt, the transmission could experience wear issues.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous commenters praised the vehicle's stunning color combination and overall appeal. @shellb called it a "Stunning color combo!" while @Adroit707 noted that it was an "amazing color combo" and highlighted its extensive options. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) received compliments for the vehicle's well-maintained status and excellent service records, even sharing assurances about the car's overall appeal and transparency in sales. Additionally, @car guy84 remarked on the unique color, emphasizing it is not something commonly seen.
Neutral: Questions about the vehicle's condition and maintenance were raised, with @Jjbuns inquiring about the number of keys and @nick778 asking for details regarding the brakes and tire tread depths. @Smithabq shared concerns about a past overheating incident, hoping for more information about the car's history, while @Ponybetter echoed this request. Meanwhile, @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) clarified that the vehicle comes with three keys and provided detailed answers about maintenance records, service history, and repair work, which contributed to an objective understanding of the car's condition.
Negative: A few reservations were voiced concerning potential issues with the vehicle. @Smithabq identified a troubling overheating event in the car's history, expressing a desire for tangible evidence of the engine's integrity. @oxfordST flagged concerns over rust on the rotors and suggested the necessity of brake and tire replacements. @Yags questioned the explanation about the paint work on the rear bumper compared to the overall originality of the paint, indicating some skepticism regarding the vehicle's assessed condition. Overall, some comments indicated apprehension about certain repair histories and maintenance uncertainties.
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics emphasizes their commitment to smooth and transparent transactions, showcasing their high Google Reviews rating of 4.9/5.0 with hundreds of five-star reviews. This indicates a strong customer satisfaction and trust in their services. Additionally, they offer various logistical support for buyers, including nationwide/international shipping, which further highlights their dedication to customer convenience and satisfaction.
Neutral: @66caddy824 inquires about the window sticker and original manuals for the vehicle, indicating potential interest in its completeness and authenticity. @Collectibleclassics responds by confirming that all available documents were presented but clarifying that they did not receive the manuals or sticker. This exchange suggests that while some buyers may seek complete documentation, others may find the absence of these items acceptable as long as the vehicle's status is transparent.
Negative: @Rizone asks whether the vehicle is a scat pack, which might imply confusion or uncertainty regarding the model specifications. The question could indicate that the listing might not have provided all the necessary details to clarify the specifications of the vehicle, which could lead to potential buyers feeling misinformed or hesitant about making a purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @dukey expressed appreciation for the individual cars offered, particularly noting the aesthetics of the wheels on this particular model. Additionally, @RoadKingMike complimented the car's appearance and inquired about detailing services for the driver's seat to enhance its condition.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) provided an informative overview of their services and operations, detailing their commitment to unique vehicles sourced from private sellers. They also mentioned their high customer satisfaction ratings and encouraged potential buyers to reach out for inspections or logistics support, maintaining transparency throughout the buying or consignment process.
Negative: @MaxHdRm18 raised a question about the inclusion of essential items like a jack or spare tire, implying concern about the vehicle's preparedness for unexpected issues. In response, @Collectibleclassics clarified that such items would not be part of the sale, which could disappoint some potential buyers looking for a complete setup.
|
 |
Positive: @Shelby89 has showcased a very nice 1971 Honda CT70H-model, which features its original engine. The bike, which was restored in 2018, still looks amazing and comes in a beautiful Topaz Orange color. @longhornsports shared a personal connection, noting that they have the exact same model and color in their neighborhood, reinforcing the fun and nostalgia associated with this bike. @CT70MAN echoed this sentiment, praising the bike's appearance after restoration and suggesting it is a great investment that promises enjoyment for the owner.
Neutral: Several comments highlight the nostalgia and fond memories associated with the Honda CT70 bikes, indicating they have held a special place in many people’s hearts over the years. Both @longhornsports and @RPl1 expressed a continued love for these bikes, emphasizing that winning the auction would bring a lot of joy. Additionally, the seller, @Shelby89, mentioned the bike has been recently serviced and that everything functions properly, adding to a sense of reliability in the vehicle.
Negative: There was a question about the title of the bike from @darfl, indicating that some potential buyers may have concerns regarding ownership verification as the seller stated that the bike only comes with a Bill of Sale. This lack of a title could deter some buyers despite the positive comments surrounding the bike's condition and nostalgia. Overall, while the comments lean positively on the bike's appeal, the title issue raises a valid concern in the buying process.
|
 |
Positive: @UBMotorCo commented on the impressive efforts of Collectible Classics in sourcing rare vehicles from private sellers across the United States. @giantsteps expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it lovely, while @KP777 highlighted the Mercedes-Benz SL500's reliability, particularly praised the bulletproof engine and transmission, and appreciated the beautiful color combination. @Collectibleclassics noted the car's exceptional condition, stating it features all original paint, a well-maintained headliner, and a convertible top that operates flawlessly. @Mr_Coyne echoed these sentiments, stating the SL is a diminishing classic with great value, and @tjtullyman shared positivity about similar models, encouraging buyers to enjoy driving them.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's condition were mixed, with @hausblau and @Loutrigs777 both raising concerns about the front bumper. They questioned why it appeared misaligned and whether it could be securely reattached. @Mrtiticus suggested that, despite the minor concerns, they could take care of the bumper repair to alleviate buyer anxiety, while @Zada1 sought clarification on whether the mounting points were damaged. @QuoVadis noted the peculiar condition of the driver's side headlight and the state of the key fob, suggesting that those details may indicate a larger story about the car's history. @Johnnybee113 inquired specifically about any potential issues with the hydraulic system related to the convertible roof.
Negative: Several comments expressed concerns regarding the vehicle's minor cosmetic issues. @Polishadonis commented that the car didn't have enough beige for their tastes, and @Johnnybee113 cautioned about the hydraulic system's maintenance history, despite the seller's assurances. @Kaaawa and @Zada1 both pointed out the front bumper alignment issues. Additionally, @bmwnutslooth raised doubts about the hydraulic work being documented, indicating possible uncertainty in the seller's information. @Zada1 reiterated concerns about the bumper's condition, pressing for further clarity from the seller on whether there was any underlying damage, while @Mrtiticus echoed sentiments about addressing these imperfections for the sake of transparency in the auction.
|
 |
Positive: @sean_s remarked on the gorgeous color spec of the vehicle, suggesting it might have been a special order. @PhilMcCrackenn expressed his appreciation for the unique color combination, contrasting it positively against the prevalence of Obsidian Black interiors. @dtmurphy echoed this sentiment by referring to the paint as Goodwood Green, describing it as non-metallic and absolutely gorgeous, thus contributing to the overall appeal of the vehicle's aesthetics.
Neutral: Some comments sought clarity about the vehicle's specifications, such as @arirochmann's inquiry regarding the Monroney label and tire date code, which the seller confirmed. @BlessedGuy (The Seller) provided details regarding the paint and reinforced the transparency of the information shared, including a breakdown of paint thickness measurements. Further discussions included the condition of the wheels, which were stock but powder-coated to achieve a satin black finish, and the services performed on the car including references from previous owners.
Negative: Conversely, there were concerns raised about the vehicle's past repainting and the condition of the exterior. @ALippman and @arirochmann questioned the extent of the repainting process, prompting @BlessedGuy (The Seller) to clarify that it was a cosmetic refinish due to factory defects. Additionally, there were implications about some loose weather stripping noted by @arirochmann, leading to more scrutiny about the overall condition of the vehicle. @RobandWill also expressed worry over the seller's early decision to sell, questioning if it indicated potential issues with the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @XDrive (The Seller) received numerous commendations for their communication and responsiveness throughout the buying process. @stukinnascif praised the quality of the vehicle photos, highlighting the extensive detail shown that is not typically available in other listings. Additionally, @Speedster13 complimented the car's appearance and color combination, reflecting positively on its visual appeal.
Neutral: There were requests for information and specific details about the vehicle. @TimPemberton inquired about the Carfax report and previous ownership history, showing interest in the car's background. Furthermore, questions were raised about features such as the satellite radio function and the removable cup holder, indicating a practical interest in the car's usability and specifications.
Negative: Some comments highlighted concerns regarding the vehicle's components, particularly with @TimPemberton's focus on the strut mounts and the potential age of the tires. These inquiries pointed to an underlying apprehension about the car's maintenance and long-term reliability. Additionally, there were mixed opinions on the model variations of the vehicle, as noted by @nowskiii, suggesting that while the car looks nice, choices have varied legitimacy among different models.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's color, specifically the unique shade of Cornetite Blue, which some found stunning and unfamiliar, enhancing its appeal. @QueenElizabeth3 praised the color, noting that it is spectacular, and @WallyWombat shared that driving a similar model is an absolute joy, emphasizing comfort and speed. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, received a lot of attention for their professional and transparent approach, highlighting their high customer satisfaction ratings and unique inventory. This fosters a sense of trust and excitement among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification regarding the vehicle's condition and service history. @EJrumble and @SimonTemplarVA raised questions about potential leaks, the vehicle's alignment, and the history of the struts, to which the seller provided thorough answers indicating no leaks and a smooth running engine. There was also a discussion around aesthetic elements, like the aftermarket rear spoiler and the delamination of door cards, which are common issues in older luxury vehicles but noted to be manageable.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's physical condition and features. @TexasMule expressed disappointment that the rear seats do not fold down, comparing it unfavorably to a newer model. Some commenters identified issues that might require attention, such as the delamination of door panels mentioned by @aim_fbm4532 and the evidence of oil residue on the engine cover from @SimonTemplarVA. Additionally, doubts about the repaint status emerged, indicated by @MakingMesses and @EJrumble, which sparked confusion about the vehicle's original color and condition.
|
 |
Positive: The comments from @Collectibleclassics highlight the appealing aspects of the 2007 BMW M6 Convertible, such as its low mileage of just 10,000 miles and its status as a one-owner vehicle with a great service history. Potential buyers are encouraged to bid with confidence, as indicated by the emphasis on the car's quality and the assurance of transparent transactions. Additionally, there are positive remarks regarding the seller's reputation, as their Google Reviews boast a high rating of 4.9 out of 5, showcasing customer satisfaction.
Neutral: A few comments raise questions regarding the auction process, such as @danhope03 asking why the vehicle was relisted and whether the previous auction had a reserve. @Gregt909 inquires about the condition of the car, specifically regarding the dash material and whether both keys are available. @Collectibleclassics responds to these inquiries with clarifications, indicating that the dash had some minor repair work and confirming that only one key is available, providing potential buyers with more information to consider.
Negative: Some comments indicate confusion and concerns about pricing, such as @lilpete's remark about the bid amount being $20,000 instead of $200,000, which seemed to cause a mix-up among other users. This was humorously acknowledged by @zigmaster110 and @icecreammatt, which indicates that there may be some oversight or miscommunication regarding the auction details. @Collectibleclassics attempts to address these issues, but the initial confusion could deter some potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @alskin praised the seller for their professional presentation in showcasing the car, expressing a wish that others could match such standards. @JosephAuto admired the timeless design of the TR6, recalling fond memories associated with the car from his youth. @MichaelsMotorCarsPA (The Seller) agreed with @67tr4a on the enduring beauty of these vehicles, underscoring the appealing design that has aged well. Furthermore, @MichaelsMotorCarsPA shared specific details about the TR6's performance enhancements, such as improved engine response and a tightly tuned suspension, highlighting it as a fun and rewarding driving experience.
Neutral: @Toivo_ raised a question about the passenger compartment's narrowness in the TR6, noting a lack of armrests and issues with door accessibility. @mmilanowicz inquired about the availability of a Carfax report for the vehicle, while @extended46 provided observations about the frame reinforcement work evident on the car, showing both concern and interest in the vehicle's structural integrity. @MichaelsMotorCarsPA (The Seller) acknowledged these inquiries and offered detailed responses, emphasizing the car's overall solid condition despite some corrosion.
Negative: @Birdman2 expressed concerns regarding potential rust on the rocker panels, seeking clarification on specific photos that suggested corrosion issues. Another comment pointed to problems with the way the top of the car is folded, potentially causing damage. @MichaelsMotorCarsPA (The Seller) confirmed the presence of corrosion but assured that the car is overall sound. However, the emphasis on imperfections, along with worries about the frame and body restoration choices, generated cautious skepticism from prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenter @bhhumphrey highlights the impressiveness of the vehicle, remarking on its value as a potential investment due to its mechanical condition and desirability in the market. The openly shared sentiment is that while the acquisition cost might be high, the car promises long-term satisfaction as depreciation decreases in the future. Additionally, @gscharnagl finds the color combination to be exceptional and cites its desirability, reinforcing the vehicle’s aesthetic appeal and overall condition as a standout among similar models.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) provides confirmations regarding the vehicle's condition, mentioning that while the mechanical aspects are in great shape, the dash has not been repaired and would involve a few thousand dollars if the next owner chooses to fix it. Other commenters, such as @MikeinTN and @Gators6915, express curiosity about repair costs for the dash, with discussions surrounding the commonality of this issue in SL63s and potential repair solutions. Options for further inspections and additional photographs of specific vehicle areas are also suggested in the comments, emphasizing a level of due diligence among prospective buyers.
Negative: There are significant concerns raised about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the bubbling dash, as highlighted by commenters like @Hoodude and @Mikepk, who mention the high potential costs for necessary repairs. @NIKISUPREME provides insight from a body shop, estimating dash replacement at around $6,500 to $8,000, which is worrisome for potential buyers considering the overall investment. Commenter @JRBierman reflects on the need for the car to be perfect, emphasizing that he would budget substantially for repairs, showcasing a common anxiety among bidders about unexpected maintenance expenses.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its impressive condition and features. @1fast1555 (The Seller) emphasizes that the car is exceptionally clean and well-maintained, having been thoroughly inspected before purchase. The inclusion of a black hardtop, which matches the forged 2-piece HRE wheels, adds to the car's aesthetic appeal. @P0rsche956 mentions their personal experience with a similar model, praising the car's sporty nature and reliable performance, which enhances its credibility as a desirable option for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several users seek clarification regarding specific features and history of the vehicle. @apbb2 inquires about the origins of the hard top, and @Crestwood996 asks about the hardtop's interior and any potential mechanical issues like fluid leaks or working AC/heat. @Aesthete expresses curiosity about the electronic nature of the top and requests a demonstration of its operation. These inquiries indicate a genuine interest in the vehicle's specifications and performance.
Negative: There are few negative comments present, mostly revolving around concerns about minor details. @Crestwood996, for example, probes about fluid leaks, DME report, and asks for confirmation regarding operational issues, but these seem more precautionary than critical. Additionally, @Aesthete's concerns about the flickering lights in the video may suggest a lack of confidence in the video presentation. However, the seller addresses these concerns appropriately, aiming to alleviate any apprehension from potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @ADSkillen expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it a "pretty ride." They also engaged with the seller, asking about features like the back-up camera. Another user, @CWinds, also noted the aesthetic appeal of the car, describing it as a "nice looking ride" after pointing out a detail in the photos.
Neutral: The seller, @Collectibleclassics, provided detailed responses to every inquiry, indicating a customer-focused approach. They acknowledged @steve.turley's question about blindside assist, confirming that there was no indication of it being present, and later addressed questions from @consultant8985 about service history by mentioning a lack of extra service receipts but offering to find out more. Additionally, they promised @johninreno a video of the convertible top operation, reflecting a commitment to remedy customer concerns.
Negative: Conversely, there were some concerns raised by users. @sleach2 inquired about the inspection status of the car for a bidder from Pennsylvania, hinting at uncertainty in the inspection process. @Glidergeek raised issues about the single key for the vehicle and questioned the possible mismatch in the front tow hook cover color compared to the bumper cover. @ADSkillen also highlighted a discrepancy in the Carfax regarding the car's color history, showcasing potential issues that could affect buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is being praised for its appearance and condition by various commenters. @Blizzard340 highlights it as a reliable alternative to the Land Cruiser at a realistic price. @HooniverseJeff finds it to be a clean example of the Gen 1 model, while @pwgmin (The Seller) confirms satisfaction with the truck's driving performance, stating it handles smoothly on the freeway without any shakes up to 65 mph. The seller provides thorough answers to inquiries about rust, vehicle functionalities, and has even uploaded detailed videos addressing concerns, indicating confidence in the truck’s quality.
Neutral: Commenters appreciate the detailed photos and videos shared by @pwgmin (The Seller) which provide clarity on the truck's condition. @dkcochran asks specific questions about potential rust issues, functionality of features like cruise control and AC, which the seller answers comprehensively, assuring that there are no significant concerns. @MarineBanker inquires about the 4WD operation and prior ownership, to which the seller responds positively, noting it engages smoothly and has documented service history, leading to the impression that the truck is roadworthy for longer trips.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the vehicle's audio equipment, particularly the non-functioning cassette player as pointed out by @gemmawarren, and the potential need for a compression test as @H3llb3nt1 suggests. There is also an introspective caution from @dentfender recommending that, due to the vehicle's pristine condition, it should be shipped enclosed to maintain its quality and avoid any exposure to harsh conditions. Additionally, @BMW111's queries about specific details like the oil pressure and rear carpet stain reflect a cautious interest, signifying that potential buyers are weighing their options carefully.
|
5k-Mile 1994 Ford F-350 XL 7.3L Diesel Dually 4×4 Mini Pumper Fire Truck
1FDKF38M8REA16751
Lot 227049
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciated the unique design of the truck, particularly the oversized front bumper, which sparked humorous interpretations as a potential dance platform or coffee table. @4spdBernie praised the vehicle, calling it a "beautiful rig," showing enthusiasm for the listing. Furthermore, @Baja1978 provided comprehensive video demonstrations showcasing the vehicle’s functionality, including how to engage its pump and operate the nozzles, which added to the overall positive impression of the truck's capabilities.
Neutral: There were inquiries about specific features and details regarding the vehicle, such as whether it had air conditioning, confirmation of mileage, tire conditions, and the type of engine. @Celticcross and @BQuintrell sought clarity on features like the lack of A/C and the accuracy of the mileage, with @Baja1978 responding thoroughly to each question to assure potential buyers of the truck's condition. The discussion also included notes on tires and their age, helping potential buyers gauge the overall upkeep of the vehicle.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns over the vehicle's features and history, with @BQuintrell questioning the mileage discrepancy noted in a state auction listing and feeling uneasy about the accuracy. Other users brought up peculiar aspects of the truck's design and potential issues like residual smoke smell, which @Baja1978 promptly addressed to mitigate any worries. The responses aimed to reassure potential buyers, but the uncertainty raised by some comments highlighted lingering doubts about the vehicle's past.
|
 |
Positive: @JoeKai commented positively on the car's overall appearance, describing it as very nice. @asdc expressed a personal fondness for the color combination of the vehicle, reminiscing about their past experience with a similar model and praising the Alpina variant as stunning. Additionally, @Tripledigit noted that the car is a beautiful example of the 7 series, highlighting its aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: @SunEnergy1 (The Seller) responded to inquiries regarding the bent wheel, clarifying that it is not causing vibration and only has curb rash. The seller mentioned their attempts to locate a replacement wheel before the auction's close, but they have been unsuccessful due to stock issues. @M_Bimmer raised questions about the car's maintenance history and key included, indicating that they seek more detailed information to aid in their bidding decision.
Negative: @Powerandart criticized the condition of the bent wheel, suggesting it should simply be replaced rather than repaired due to the car's value. @wthies raised concerns about the length of time since the last oil change, implying potential deferred maintenance could be an issue. @M_Bimmer highlighted several problematic aspects regarding the vehicle's maintenance and specifications, emphasizing the importance of adhering to specific guidelines for the Alpina model to avoid future problems.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed excitement about the vehicle, highlighting its impressive attributes. @kylehanslovan noted that the car 'looks amazing,' while @boaboyoz praised its fierce design, calling it a 'wicked in white' and complimenting the seller on their no reserve auction. @scottythrust shared the thrill of driving a race car on public roads, mentioning similar upgrades to their own vehicle, emphasizing the fun factor associated with such performance cars.
Neutral: Comments from the seller, @Premierautofl, provide clarity on the vehicle's legal status, confirming that it comes with a clean and clear title and is registered in North Carolina. @Carguy959930 and @StaffNumber9527 both raised inquiries regarding the title and street legality, to which the seller confirmed that the car is street legal after passing state safety inspections. The seller also promised to provide additional video footage of the vehicle's performance.
Negative: Several concerns were raised by users regarding potential issues with the vehicle. @BATuser4334 questioned the absence of videos showcasing the car's performance from a stop, suggesting uncertainty about the manual clutch's engagement. @dracaris mentioned a similar problem with their own vehicle regarding mileage, while @centerlockmotorsports inquired about maintenance history and safety equipment expiration, hinting at potential worries over the car's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Several commentators expressed favorable opinions about the vehicle, noting its high quality and ease of use. @sunshinecoastdon described it as a 'classic quality built Class B,' while @Ranchero65 appreciated its compact size, highlighting that camper vans of this size are becoming rare. @ttv566 praised Pleasure Way's durability and serviceability, asserting it is the top RV manufacturer in North America and expressing satisfaction with their own Pleasure Way Tofino. @57charlie echoed these sentiments regarding the durability and ease of maneuverability of the vehicle, suggesting it is well-suited for various travel conditions.
Neutral: Multiple users engaged in specific inquiries regarding the dimensions and specifications of the vehicle. @AutoTraitor asked for height and bed size details, while @lpethick sought clarification on the standing height inside and the function of the shower drain pan. @gngbody7 was interested in the date codes of the tires and previous maintenance records. @Svenknut63 also asked for tank sizes and bed dimensions, with additional comments from @BillBagley regarding accessibility from airports, emphasizing a desire for clarity on numerous measurements for potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments highlighted concerns related to the vehicle's sleeping capacity and interior space. @oldcarjunky pointed out that while the vehicle can seat four, it appears only to comfortably sleep two adults, raising questions about where extra passengers would rest. @Ranchero65 mentioned that fitting more than two people could be challenging, humorously suggesting a tent for additional guests. This sentiment reflects a common concern among potential buyers about the vehicle’s limited sleeping arrangements, especially for families.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @amotorsports, has shown transparency and extensive knowledge about the vehicle, which is appreciated by potential buyers like @mschellhorn. The vehicle is described as a genuine civilian Hummer H1, operating reliably with no active leaks, and has been well-maintained, including a recent oil change and drive belt replacement. With just over 100k miles, it is noted to be rust-free and draws attention for its collector-grade status, offering a unique blend of functionality and collectible value. The seller is also open to assisting with requests for modifications and shipping options, enhancing the overall buying experience.
Neutral: Comments from buyers suggest there is curiosity about the vehicle’s features, such as whether the A/C is working, and the mileage, which @streamliner confirmed is just over 100,000. Additionally, buyers like @Ignoramoose bring up specific insights regarding the model, such as its unique A/C unit and the limitations of the vehicle's design like its speed and ride quality. Despite these concerns, there is an acknowledgment of the H1's rarity and the potential value of parts available for it.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about certain aspects of the vehicle, specifically by @Ignoramoose, who notes that the H1 model by this year may be less livable due to its three-speed transmission needing more gears and an underpowered engine. The tires available for the 16.5-inch wheels are limited to old military options, which impact ride quality. Furthermore, @mschellhorn questioned the condition of cracks on the vehicle, prompting the seller to confirm that they are minor cosmetic issues likely caused by wear over time, leading to a request for any potential repairs before delivery.
|
 |
Positive: @JORA_Imports (The Seller) provided several reassuring comments about the vehicle, highlighting its solid condition and readiness for many more miles with proper maintenance. They confirmed that the car comes with two full key fobs and a service record, and that the vehicle is entirely rust-free, having been a southern car throughout its life. The seller also elaborated on the car's well-maintained status, mentioning over $700 in recent maintenance to prepare it for sale, showcasing efforts such as oil changes and inspections to boost buyer confidence.
Neutral: @Gatoro and @ChrisHoudeshel asked about the vehicle's tires and trunk area, with @ChrisHoudeshel specifically requesting pictures of the trunk and storage area. @patti_fromPA was interested in service records, which @JORA_Imports (The Seller) assured they would upload soon. Comments were made about the car's color, with @jdm4fsu73 discussing its unique shade and potential miscommunication regarding photos, indicating a desire for clarity and accurate representation of the vehicle before making a bid.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the authenticity of the images shared, particularly by @acb54561, who noted a discrepancy in the vehicle shown in one of the photos. @rc_williams also requested further detailed videos of the vehicle's functionality but was met with a somewhat dismissive response from @JORA_Imports (The Seller), who indicated they were too busy to satisfy these requests fully. Additionally, @SwaziMAN expressed a need for confirmation regarding the infotainment system in the headrests, indicating potential uncertainty in the vehicle's features.
|
 |
Positive: @SingleClutch appreciates the overall condition of the vehicle, noting it appears very tidy both inside and out, and highlights its desirable 5MT feature. They also mention the appeal of the camper top as a nice option alongside the open bed. Their comment suggests that the initial owner took great care in maintaining it. @silks530 shares an amusing observation from their wife, who likens the vehicle to a "strange looking Outback," indicating a unique character, and expresses that they find it cool. @AutoOverload also shares enthusiasm for the vehicle after examining it, mentioning that he finds it even more appealing after confirming there are no tire issues.
Neutral: @JaimeMuleMas raises a valid inquiry about the mileage on the replacement engine, particularly concerning new components such as the timing and water pump. @CarDogThreePedals notes the rarity of a Subaru Baja equipped with a camper shell, hinting at its uniqueness in the market. @CarsGlobal (The Seller) responds to inquiries, particularly mentioning the care taken with engine replacement and repairs, which includes a JDM engine installation and a comprehensive list of updated components, helping clarify concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @Herringbone whimsically reflects on the original owner's choice to special order a camper top, portraying a sense of adventure associated with the vehicle's history.
Negative: @raymath29 points out potential minor damage to the left rear armrest, speculating it might be related to a pet. @RioMimbres expresses concern over the vehicle's inspection history, noting it failed an inspection in September 2024 and questions whether subsequent repairs were completed, since no passing inspection record appears in the Carfax report. These comments raise critical questions about the vehicle's current state and reliability, reflecting the concerns that potential buyers might have.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous commenters have praised the Cadillac Blackwing for its impressive specifications, including the supercharged 6.2 L engine with 668 HP and the six-speed manual transmission. @Cellamotors, the seller, describes it as a "bad ass" car that is extremely well spec’ed, noting its rarity with only around 500 units expected for the CT5 Blackwing in its final production year of 2026. @MrHobbs19 and @lippy express strong admiration for the car's appearance and interior quality, with the latter stating that Cadillac has surpassed other luxury brands like BMW and Audi. @reskewjr unequivocally declares the Blackwing as the best vehicle in his collection, emphasizing how it takes the cake over other prestigious models.
Neutral: Some discussions have revolved around production numbers and the vehicle's practicality. @AZSkye gives insight into past production levels, mentioning that around 1500-2000 units were produced annually, while @Cellamotors confirms he specifically chose to leave some factory elements untouched for the new owner. Regarding driving dynamics, @SRT2008 acknowledges the car's potential as a daily driver despite its performance capabilities, while other commenters express curiosity about the needed precision package and related adjustments such as alignments.
Negative: Concerns have also arisen regarding the car's mileage and whether it has been prepped adequately for sale. @Skerzz questions the mileage on the car, while @3Pedalonly humorously remarks on the balance between the vehicle being driven and sold. Furthermore, @dsmartin and @MattsMistakes46 discuss the high pricing associated with additional options, reflecting a sentiment that such high configurations might exceed the average buyer's budget. The interaction also hints at potential confusion regarding the installation of precision links, which can influence how the car handles daily driving.
|
 |
Positive: Multiple comments reflect positively on the vehicle's features, particularly its functionality. @mlaffeypa, the Seller, confirms that the original radio is included and was functioning prior to being removed. The air suspension also works properly, raising and lowering as it should, and there are no reported coolant leaks, which indicates good maintenance. Furthermore, the seller offers to show the vehicle in person at Sebring, suggesting transparency and customer service. The reliability of the AC and cruise control, as shared by the seller, adds to the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: Several inquiries focus on the specifications and general condition of the vehicle without expressing strong opinions. @Rbe8000 asks if the vehicle is still driven often and if it's suitable for long drives after pickup. Other commenters, like @Secondluckiest and @Twentyonpump5, seek clarification on specific parts such as the rotors and service history, indicating a cautious interest. @Dadsandgrads questions why the seller is parting with the vehicle after a year, to which the seller explains personal reasons related to consolidating his car collection for a new purchase.
Negative: There are indications of potential concerns about the vehicle's condition. @Secondluckiest highlights a discrepancy with one rotor being different from the others, prompting questions about the overall integrity of the brake system. @LastBerserker expresses apprehension regarding possible coolant leaks and the condition of coolant pipes, which might imply underlying maintenance issues. Additionally, @henryr raises a question about whether a brake controller is included, hinting at features that might be missed or not fully specified.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its classic and timeless design. @dollycat3 praises the 'Beautiful E320', while @JaDawgPNW describes it as 'Classy' and notes its stylish appeal. @OT1000 also appreciates the W210 model, referring to its reliability and attractive features, such as its resemblance to its AMG counterpart. Overall, there is a positive consensus about the car's appearance and mechanical condition, with many wishing the seller well in the auction.
Neutral: The seller, @Meatmeat, provides a detailed overview of the car's maintenance history and current condition, stating it runs well with no mechanical issues and is equipped with a good smog history. He also invites prospective buyers to inspect the vehicle personally or via virtual appointments. Some commenters inquire about specific details like the last transmission fluid change or whether the motor mounts have been replaced. @Meatmeat acknowledges these inquiries and admits some information may not be documented, but reassures potential buyers of its solid state without mechanical problems.
Negative: There are some concerns from commenters regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and potential repairs. @frank2229 raises a question about the transmission fluid servicing, to which @Meatmeat responds that the last service date isn't known. @Peter0 mentions the cost of fixing the headliner, which could deter some buyers. @Gonzod questions the status of the motor mounts and transmission mount, noting that potential leaks are a concern, although @Meatmeat emphasizes the car's current clean state underneath. These uncertainties may affect buyer confidence despite the seller's transparency.
|
1999 Ford F-350 Super Duty XLT SuperCab Power Stroke 4×4 6-Speed
1FTSX31F0XEA38334
Lot 227057
Dealer
 |
Positive: @Dan_in_Reno remarked on the truck suggesting that it looks like a quality, early 1999 model, and shares positive experiences about their own late 1999 truck which has provided 285k trouble-free miles, especially while hauling. @Viraje noted that the interior appearance of the truck is warm and comforting, reflecting positively on its condition. @wsettle68 called it a beautiful example of the model, appreciating the manual as an added bonus, and @yardbird221 expressed their enjoyment of the vehicle's aesthetics.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the specifics of the truck's build date, with @teamchinman and @john_chamorro comparing the build date to their own vehicles, indicating it might be a 02/98 or 3/98 model. @john_chamorro noted that clarification on the build date is crucial since he is considering the purchase, and provided insights about the seating arrangements for dogs. @tifjeslil (The Seller) confirmed the build date and stated that the paint is original, while responding to inquiries about additional photos and videos regarding the truck's condition.
Negative: There were some concerns over details; @jacksbimmer and @fingerscrossed had questions about the rear bench seat's folding capability, with some confusion about its configuration compared to earlier models. @wsettle68 asked for clarification on whether the grille is factory original, expressing concerns about potential modifications. Furthermore, @cyclonefe pointed out that the blurry image of the door data plate made it difficult to ascertain some details, indicating a need for clearer documentation.
|
 |
Positive: @Jeepman6 (The Seller) shared that the vehicle runs very smooth, shifts well, and has been reliable as a daily driver for two years. The body was well maintained with an undercoat from the original owner, and the only notable rust issue is a small 3/4" hole under the driver's side. Additionally, the top is in solid shape with new seals, which is often a concern for buyers of vehicles like this.
Neutral: Several viewers, including @K5Danny and @Copycat70, showed interest in additional details and inquiries about the vehicle. They requested a video to better evaluate the condition and asked specific questions about the transmission, drive train, and the SPID sticker. @Gm8351 even inquired about the possibility of fitting spare parts inside and raised questions about shipping availability, indicating an interest in logistics and original vehicle details without expressing strong opinions about condition.
Negative: @Krebsk and @Lala57 raised concerns, specifically regarding the title's cleanliness and potential rust issues, respectively. @VCT also expressed skepticism about the condition of the fiberglass top, which is known to sag. Overall, these inquiries underline some hesitation from potential buyers regarding the vehicle’s documentation and physical state.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enjoyment for the 2002 Ford Thunderbird's color and design. @stugottz highlighted admiration for the color and two-tone interior, affirming it as a nice feature. @greenerdays11 (The Seller) proudly noted the vehicle's low mileage and readiness to assist with shipping, fostering a sense of community support and engagement with potential buyers.
Neutral: Several questions arose from interested parties regarding the vehicle's history and included items. @Rmarcom inquired if the car had been a smoker's car, to which @greenerdays11 (The Seller) confirmed it was not, emphasizing the car's clean scent. @JPKmotorhead sought clarification on whether specific accessories came with the car, leading to a response confirming the presence of the owner's manual but the absence of a hardtop rack and soft boot cover.
Negative: There were some concerns about missing items and potential conditions of the car. @Rmarcom's inquiry about the auction process indicated a need for clarity on logistics if someone wins the bid. Additionally, @TJClassic had to correct the listing regarding the interior accents, suggesting there was a need for more accurate information in the auction advertisement.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle, a 2005 Cadillac XLR, has received numerous praises from potential buyers and current owners. Commentors such as @johnnyvett and @Cdn043 expressed admiration for its aesthetics and unique driving experience, with @Ranndogg noting how it is a dream to drive and a head-turner. @gallocompetitioncars echoed this sentiment, stating that it checks all the boxes with plenty of power, superb handling, and stunning looks. Many highlight the excitement of owning such a rare and well-designed classic car, with @Cdn043 describing the experience of operating the retractable top as a crowd-pleaser that garners attention wherever it goes.
Neutral: The seller, @lloyddon1, provided detailed information about the auction and the car's condition, emphasizing the vehicle's immaculate nature and no damage history. He reassured potential buyers regarding the car's performance and condition, confirming that it is turn-key ready without requiring any immediate attention. Several comments also addressed practical concerns regarding the vehicle's usability, such as @intlcgr mentioning storage issues and the impracticality for daily use due to its two-seater design. Overall, the listing encourages interaction and inquiries, highlighting the seller's willingness to provide additional information, including driving and top operation videos.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some users, including @white78, who inquired about specific hydraulic updates and the seller's responses regarding the hydraulic system seemed to cause frustration. While @lloyddon1 assured that the hydraulics were functioning as designed, @white78 expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of detail on the hydraulic pump's condition. Moreover, @LRandy questioned the high turnover rate of ownership for XLRs, reflecting a broader concern about the vehicle's practicality and potential maintenance issues. Some comments suggested that the car's unique features may not align with the expectations of all buyers, particularly if they prioritize practicality over style.
|
 |
Positive: @Johnny1eye appreciates the vehicle and envisions a V8 swap for its potential future owner, wishing them good luck with the sale. @morgannut finds the truck appealing, noting its compact size and larger bed compared to modern pickups, and suggests a potential engine upgrade for better performance while still considering the feasibility of a V8 for those interested. @robbiefarmer expresses excitement over the manual transmission, advocating for a resurgence of stick shifts, and wishes them luck with the auction. @Jpat30 shares fond memories of owning a similar truck and compliments its design, also expressing interest in the specifics of its graphics and history.
Neutral: @morgannut provides practical advice for those considering an engine swap, mentioning specific parts that could ease installation. @JAY-Z speculates on the future popularity of S-10s, hinting at a possible increase in value and encouraging potential buyers to act quickly. @Newmanjp (The Seller) responds to inquiries regarding the vehicle's graphics and body work, clarifying details about the repaint and minor repairs completed before the sale.
Negative: @DisturbedS10 identifies areas for improvement, specifically emphasizing the need for air conditioning and an engine swap. This indicates a recognition of the truck's current limitations, acknowledging that the vehicle isn't entirely turnkey. Overall, while some comments highlight nostalgia and potential, others underscore that the truck may still require further investment to reach its full potential.
|
 |
Positive: @cocomats described the vehicle simply as "Perfect," highlighting a strong satisfaction with its condition. @WishfulThinker23 pointed out that the car includes the PDR option, which is a desirable feature available in all 2LT and 3LT C8 models, further emphasizing the car's appeal among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several users expressed interest in specific features and service records of the vehicle. @C3Lee inquired about the Mag Ride suspension to gauge the performance aspects of the car. Additionally, @67Corvetteguy asked for confirmation regarding the condition of the wheels, emphasizing the importance of thorough inspections. @Crussell99 requested confirmation of the DCT service to ensure the vehicle meets maintenance criteria, reflecting a keen interest in verifying important details before making a decision.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the car's service history, particularly by @JoeKretired, who questioned the absence of DCT service records given the vehicle's age and mileage. This uncertainty raises doubts about the warranty coverage for potential transmission issues. @ericshin1213, from The Seller, acknowledged the lack of prior service documentation and noted that the current DCT filter is not OEM, which may further alarm potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @tedfrederick praised the vehicle for its great color combo and super low mileage, thanking the seller for the detailed undercarriage shots. @Huizenga shared enthusiasm for the H2, indicating the durability of the model with personal experience of an 03 H2 that performed excellently. @boaboyoz described the H2 as a wonderful and exemplary example. @Tnbusiness71 and @exclusiveauto223 both highlighted the beauty of the vehicle, particularly noting the impressive condition of the paint. The seller, @exclusiveauto223, actively engaged with potential buyers providing detailed answers and reassurance about the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Several inquiries came from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @km1475 asked for confirmation about the absence of tobacco smells, while @kenmojohnson inquired about the tire date code. Questions arose about the vehicle's mileage title from @Jcraigz, who wanted to confirm the accuracy and reported mileage branding. Also, @auto4621haus asked about the seating anchors and the functionality of the Sirius XM receiver. Other commenters like @Bgreen777 and @Jcraigz suggested requests for video uploads to provide a better visual perspective on particular parts of the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns were raised about necessary maintenance and parts. @texasjet79 questioned the need for new tires, while @Taggart619 asked about the replacement of all injectors and the state of brakes and rotors, leading to inquiries about any outstanding services needed. @Jcraigz further asked about any lights indicating issues on the dashboard. There were worries regarding the open recall status noted on the Car Fax, as indicated by @BobandLinda.
|
 |
Positive: There are several enthusiastic comments regarding the vehicle, particularly from @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 who highlighted that the S2000 is an improvement over the previous model. Additionally, @shadman01 praised the car and the responsible nature of the seller, expressing hope for a favorable outcome for both the seller and the potential buyer. The seller, @amotorsports, also exhibited a commitment to customer service by promptly addressing inquiries and providing details about the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on the vehicle’s history and current condition. @Jmk9911 inquired about the previous buyer's reasons for backing out, while also requesting photos of repairs made to the soft top. @DsizzleTX expressed interest in bidding on the car again, asking about the dents and current mileage, to which the seller explained that all dings were repaired and the mileage remained unchanged, indicating a well-maintained vehicle.
Negative: There are concerns from some commenters regarding the previous buyer's failure to complete the transaction. @Jmk9911 asked about the nature of the previous buyer’s withdrawal, while @Sailvi767 questioned whether the rejection was due to inspection or simply a lack of follow-through. These uncertainties may cause apprehension among potential buyers, as evidenced by the discussions about the car's condition prior to the bidding process.
|
 |
Positive: @Lengrep expresses excitement about owning their first BMW and notes that it is a survivor. @vinylseats, the seller, shares the car's history, mentioning that it was passed down from their dad who bought it new in 1979. They highlight that the vehicle has always been garage kept and just serviced, making it fun to drive. @runsub5 appreciates that the car is an original unmolested example and respects its condition and storage, echoing the sentiment that it has been well-maintained over the years. @Meowza88 admires the car's looks, declaring it a gorgeous vehicle.
Neutral: Comments from @vinylseats indicate that while the A/C has not been strong, it may just need servicing, providing context for potential concerns about the vehicle's electrical issues including intermittent power to the radio and fuel gauge. @David_P reassures other commenters that BMWs from this era weren't known for strong air conditioning, implying that the car may be functioning as expected. @Gingerman reminisces about their own experiences with a similar model, indicating a shared nostalgia among commenters regarding ownership of the vehicle.
Negative: @Redbaron95 raises concerns about the potential for dings and rust bubbles on the vehicle over time, suggesting that those issues may become more significant. The color Polaris isn't favored during the day but is said to work well at night. Additionally, @Lengrep notes their disappointment about the car having 49-state emissions controls, questioning its compatibility with California smog tests. This conveys a concern for future usability based on location and legal requirements.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle being sold has garnered positive attention from enthusiasts. @Bazzaland shared their own favorable experiences with a similar model, highlighting its enjoyable driving experience and engineering quality. @vfnrcc (The Seller) emphasized their commitment to high standards in listing vehicles, noting their meticulous selection process and encouragement for the community to bid confidently on their offerings. The seller's transparency and direct communication are appreciated, particularly the offer of detailed updates and responses to inquiries.
Neutral: Several commenters have expressed interest in different aspects of the vehicle's condition. @AutofileClassics raised important questions regarding the tire condition, with some evidence of oxidation and said cracking visible in pictures. They also sought clarification on the vehicle's paint job, inquiring about its uniformity and the nature of repairs previously done, indicating a desire for comprehensive understanding before placing a bid.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about specific flaws and maintenance history of the vehicle. @JaredR questioned the quality of the paint, suggesting that the whole car had been repainted, which could imply underlying issues. @T5ing and other commentators echoed concerns about the necessary replacement of the tires, with several expressing hesitations regarding cracks present on the existing units and their age, prompting doubts about the vehicle's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: @bahaboy62 commented on the beauty of the vehicle, expressing admiration and noting its rarity. @2pints also acknowledged the H23A Blue Top engine, implying a sense of excitement about its specifications. The general appreciation for the vehicle's unique traits is echoed by @eshum, who referred to it as a great artifact and a fun yet practical wagon.
Neutral: @racerboy221 found the opening bid to be interesting, indicating curiosity without a strong opinion. @originaljeeps was surprised that the vehicle wasn't offered in a manual transmission, reaching out to @Masonland for clarification regarding the factory options available for the SIR Wagons. @Masonland responded by confirming that these wagons were only available with an automatic transmission, providing useful context about the vehicle's design.
Negative: @BillMV expressed a critique of the rear end design, likening it to the work of Picasso, which indicates a less favorable opinion on its aesthetics. @originaljeeps also mentioned a sentiment that having references to "Si" or "R" in the Honda model without offering a manual transmission goes against expectations, suggesting disappointment in that aspect. Questions from @pwmar about maintenance and @tinyhousevroom regarding radio compatibility indicate concerns from potential buyers about the vehicle's condition and usability.
|
 |
Positive: @sshamsid provided several insights regarding the vehicle, confirming that the armrest is in perfect condition and has been protected to avoid cracking. The seller reassured that all major issues, particularly those commonly associated with the VR6 and V8 engines, have been resolved while under their ownership. @KenCCF also praised the car's condition, especially the interior and seats, implying that overall care has been taken with the vehicle's maintenance.
Neutral: Several commenters asked for additional information about the vehicle's features and history, including @fauxtool's question about the armrest's condition and @GraphiteBlue's inquiry regarding the coolant pipes. @4xcorey requested a cold start video, demonstrating the interest of potential buyers in the vehicle's functionality. @Jonfrancis sought clarification on the car's drivetrain and the possibility of removing the air suspension, indicating an interest in customizing the car if purchased.
Negative: There were some concerns raised by commenters, particularly @911dreaming and @ragadEdge, who questioned the functionality of the air suspension and requested a cold start video under specific conditions to assess the engine's noise levels. @ragadEdge also referenced common issues like water intrusion and potential mildew odors, suggesting a need for thorough inspections. @IWantEveryCar sought clarification about the vehicle's smoke-free status and confirmed the presence of drainage issues, indicating some uncertainty regarding the car's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: Overall, many comments regarding the vehicle are positive, with several users appreciating its appearance and the care it has received over the years. @Russ simply stated, 'It is a beautiful car!' highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @OspreyPoint also echoed this sentiment by describing it as 'a beautiful car and well presented.' Additionally, @OldCarProbs (The Seller) shared that the car had been kept garaged since it was purchased new, which adds to its appeal as a well-maintained, low-mileage option.
Neutral: In the neutral comments, potential buyers requested more information and images regarding various aspects of the vehicle. @ACRX7 asked for undercarriage pictures, while @dembeckp noted the absence of pictures of the undercarriage and engine compartment. @thriftyscrooge raised inquiries about service records and maintenance history, demonstrating a keen interest in the car's past but remaining ambiguous about their ultimate impression. @NewUpper acknowledged the car's beauty but cautioned about potential aging components due to its age, suggesting a balanced perspective on the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Some negative comments were focused on concerns about the vehicle's history and components. @AbarthEsq questioned the presence of a 'substitute' title, indicating potential worries over documentation. Meanwhile, @Herringbone speculated whether important components, such as the IMS bearing, needed replacement, raising concerns for prospective buyers. @nkowi pointed out possible cosmetic issues, including a scratch and a smudge, which could affect the car's overall presentation. Finally, @Burnz57 sought clarification regarding the IMS bearing replacement, uncertain if it pertained to this vehicle or another, underscoring the unease surrounding the car's maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: Comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's vintage charm and unique features. @rogers expressed excitement over the car's condition despite its mileage, noting it to be an excellent example of a classic with the desirable 4-speed transmission. @Dollycat3 highlighted the beauty of the 250SE coupe, praising its color, interior, and engaging driving experience, while @Bricksticks expressed interest in seeing a driving video to further appreciate the vehicle. The overall sentiment acknowledges the extensive care and work put into the vehicle, suggesting a positive view of its condition and performance.
Neutral: Some participants shared informative observations about specific features and historical context of the vehicle. @dcpropulsion provided insightful details about the engine's evolution and its reliability compared to later models, contributing valuable knowledge to the discussion. @Kaaawa raised questions regarding potential rust issues, indicating an interest in the car's overall condition. Additionally, @Irebld speculated on the originality of the interior materials, fostering a constructive dialogue about the vehicle's specifications and components.
Negative: On the downside, several users pointed out mechanical and aesthetic shortcomings. @subforry noted excessive black paint where body color should have been and mentioned various questionable components, which raised concerns about the vehicle's overall state. @raykosh characterized the car as a project in need of substantial mechanical attention and criticized the choice of cheap vinyl seat covers. @Kaaawa expressed disappointment regarding the car's handling on the freeway, suggesting it might not perform as expected, while @mayart questioned the lack of symmetry in the headrest design, adding to the list of concerns about the car's condition.
|
Single-Family-Owned 1967 Pontiac Bonneville Convertible 4-Speed
262677P231961
Lot 227002
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many comments praised the originality and uniqueness of the vehicle, highlighting its original 4-speed transmission and factory-installed features. @Fuelieguy emphasized its rarity, mentioning that few of these models escaped destruction, and @ssclassic reminisced about the power and handling that defined Pontiac cars of the 1960s. Other enthusiasts like @MoparMan and @DrRocket found the car intriguing, with @DrRocket commending the seller for effectively managing the auction and the interest generated.
Neutral: Several comments focused on questions regarding the vehicle's history and specifications. @winnerct, the seller, provided information about the original paint, repairs done to the soft top, and minor body work such as a dent on the passenger side. Discussions about the engine’s authenticity generated a mix of opinions, with commenters requesting PHS documents to clarify if the engine was replaced; @winnerct was forthcoming about the uncertainty surrounding the engine's history and promised more documentation would be provided.
Negative: However, some comments raised concerns about potential issues with the car, like the rough condition of certain parts and the need for restoration. @mcj4250 pointedly questioned the dealer invoice details, while @wierwilleb expressed skepticism about the vehicle's past and the possibility of an engine swap, hinting at a lack of transparency. @Jimbob123 and others reflected on their past experiences with similar vehicles, noting maintenance challenges and expressing caution about the car's rust and overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is presented as an exciting addition by @vfnrcc (The Seller), who boasts over 50 years of experience in the car industry, ensuring quality and attention to detail in each listing. Multiple comments praise the vehicle's condition, with @Discobob noting its impressive sorting, and @rcrowder emphasizing its rare rust-free status. Commenters appreciate aspects like its suitability as a winter vehicle, with @BlitzLead highlighting its capability as a daily driver in snowy conditions.
Neutral: Several commenters express curiosity about the vehicle's maintenance and specifications. For example, @belvinollc inquires about the engine stamping, while @JESubie17 asks about the condition of various engine components. @vfnrcc (The Seller) provides detailed responses, including that the vehicle has undergone recent service with certain parts being aftermarket. Additional queries center around the vehicle's past recalls and inspection readiness, with @Zcrownroyal seeking clarification on inspection and emission requirements.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about the vehicle's automatic transmission, which led @scripthead to lose interest in the car. Additionally, @Dolce71 underscores the importance of using OEM parts for maintenance, raising skepticism about the vehicle's service history based on its Carfax report. There are also inquiries about potential rust and power accessory issues from commenters like @Jonfrancis and @bouncefactor, indicating a mix of concern among potential buyers about the vehicle's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters are expressing their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive build quality and performance. @ClassicJack123 praises the car for being driven as it should be, while @smolof calls it a 'beauty and a beast.' @Platinummotorspdx shares their previous ownership experience and emphasizes that the future buyer will enjoy a thrilling ride. Comments like those from @Tudor303 and @longhornsports echo this sentiment, describing the car as a 'bad a$ 55' and a 'wicked and nasty beast' respectively. Overall, the consensus among enthusiasts is that this vehicle is not just beautiful, but also carries significant power and excitement.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed curiosity about the car's specifications and features. @catpat8000 asked about the alcohol injection system, indicating interest in the performance aspects but also caution about potential risks. @Pacheco167 commented on the current auction dynamics, suggesting they are surprised by the no-reserve auction format. Meanwhile, @autocentroimports (The Seller) provided responses to inquiries, noting the lack of certain records and suggesting further communications for potential buyers. Overall, while the interest in the specifics reflects a neutral observational quality, it indicates a respectful curiosity about the vehicle's details.
Negative: There were a few critical remarks pointing out areas for improvement regarding the car's modifications. @standurst acknowledged the beauty of the car but expressed surprise that a more modern steering setup, such as rack and pinion, was not implemented. Additionally, @Pacheco167's comment about the auction value implied skepticism towards the selling price, questioning the decision to list it without a reserve and suggesting it could go unsold at a lower bid. The mixed feelings expressed by some commenters suggest that while they appreciate the car, there are underlying concerns about its marketability and technical updates.
|
|
|