Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: Comments reflect a strong admiration for the vehicle, with many users expressing envy and awe for its design and rarity. @eggzackly describes it as 'peak 356,' while @Bschurr highlights its amazing and gorgeous nature, indicating that this Porsche is a coveted collector's item. Other commentors like @Dollycat3 and @Leif_in_Calif echo similar sentiments, calling it 'absolutely rare,' and noting its remarkable features such as the 'beautiful photography' that showcases the car's elegance. Enthusiasts seem excited about its engineering and aesthetic, with mentions of its historical significance in the Porsche lineage, further amplifying its desirability.
Neutral: Some comments provide technical insights and inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and history without strong emotional attachment. @PietroFontanella and @dougdadmac pose practical questions regarding maintenance, such as changing a fan belt and referencing detailed historical pricing for the model in the past. Other commenters like @carrera56 are curious about multimedia content, such as videos of the engine sounds, and request additional information about the car's features and previous ownership history. This information exchange reflects the community's interest in understanding the car's attributes fully, contributing to the overall dialogue surrounding the auction.
Negative: There are a few critical remarks about the vehicle, mainly related to its maintenance and auction history. @danhonda mentions previous paint damage and a dent noted in auction reports, questioning the seller about offering pictures of these concerns. Additionally, some comments hint at skepticism about the car's rapid resale after having been recently bought at auction, with @Shelby314159 indicating there might be a quick flip involved. @bobofohio and others express discomfort with the practice of cold revving a classic car during the bidding process, pointing to a highly emotional connection between the enthusiasts and the care required for vintage cars like this Carrera 2.
 |
 |
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle's beauty and desirability. @Jim_Liberty noted its appeal as a speedster with roll-up windows, while @GDogg referred to it as an absolute gem. @desicar simply described it as 'gorgeous', and @BurningDinos humorously expressed a wish to spend a large sum on it. Enthusiasts like @Shawh and @RonnyB discussed its rarity and characteristics, with @Shawh congratulating the consigner and @RonnyB highlighting how the Convertible D model combines the aesthetics of a Speedster with practical features. Moreover, many noted the quality of the restoration, with @Davo356 describing it as a gem due to its matching numbers and restorer reputation.
Neutral: Some comments provided constructive observations regarding the vehicle's components and restoration details. @weissach and @zeres raised points about the accurate specifications for the vehicle's floor and exhaust, reflecting an interest in both the car's vintage appeal and practical performance enhancements. @idgidu, the seller, engaged with these discussions by sharing insights about the restoration process and acknowledging the floor modifications while emphasizing their relevance to the car's overall performance rather than pure originality. Comments regarding the car's conveniences compared to original models were also made by @vicSkirmants and others who noted its usability.
Negative: On the critical side, several commenters pointed out various discrepancies in the car's restoration that could affect its desirability. @weissach noted potential issues with the steering column and gauges, while @zeres expressed concerns over the authenticity of the exhaust and bumper modifications. Other forum members like @prs suggested that many of these details are often nitpicked, which detracts from the overall enjoyment of the car. There was a consensus that while it may not be entirely stock, the modifications are typical for classic cars like this and possibly better for driving, yet some purists might be disappointed with the changes.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters are enthusiastic about the 2006 Ford GT Heritage Edition, highlighting its aesthetic and performance attributes. @boaboyoz describes it as a "handsome" car, while @jg1313 notes its "excellent condition." Others like @Beans_Bacon and @zarcherinok emphasize the car's character and the credibility of the seller, @KalebCars, who is regarded highly within the community. Commenters appreciate the car's low mileage of 12,954 and the special Gulf livery, which adds to its appeal. @zachsparks expresses admiration for the car's beauty and the confidence one can have in buying from @KalebCars.
Neutral: The seller, @KalebCars, provides detailed information about the vehicle, stating that it is in showroom condition and comes fully serviced for the new owner. He mentions the car's history, which includes being a one-owner vehicle and having all original components. Several commenters engage in discussions about the pricing of the GTs, reflecting on market trends with mentions of high auction records. @ronson68L78 and @kjducguy inquire about specific features, highlighting the unique aspects of this Heritage edition, such as the factory roundels and color options.
Negative: Some comments hint at a sense of nostalgia or regret about the past pricing of these vehicles, with @badcad recalling when the prices were significantly lower. @80sDude expresses feelings of inadequacy regarding ownership potential, referring to the car as a "masterpiece" beyond their reach. Additionally, @Button posits that the car might just serve as an asset rather than a true vehicle for enjoyment, questioning its current purpose. These mixed opinions indicate some apprehensions about the current market and the car's place within it.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its unique design and preservation. @SDCR described it as the "best tag I've seen all week," while @jka73 noted its beauty and potential as an addition to their own collection. Others, like @MoparMan, praised the car's sleek profile and appealing features, remarking on its impressive styling compared to earlier models. @BigStrike called it an "absolute smoke show" and @e9er remarked it was the best looking Marlin they'd seen, showcasing a passionate appreciation for this iconic car model. @johnF1966 acknowledged AMC's innovative design efforts during that era, noting that despite minimal financial resources compared to larger manufacturers, they were able to create something distinct.
Neutral: Some comments reflected a neutral stance on specific features of the car. @jka73 mentioned a preference for the AMC dark gold engine color, indicating a personal taste difference regarding the turquoise blue. @stevedutt0n asked if different seating configurations were available, showing curiosity rather than criticism. The seller, @59caddyman, provided in-depth information about the car's history and features, including the low mileage and original interior materials. Additionally, discussions about the trunk's operational issues, such as the trunk lid's support problem raised by @jcruss69, were presented as informational rather than negative, suggesting a willingness from buyers to understand potential maintenance needs.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters raised concerns or doubts about the vehicle's condition. @pghpainter mentioned noticing fresh spray paint underneath the car, suggesting potential hidden issues that might mislead buyers about its true condition. This comment implied a level of distrust about how the restoration was handled. Additionally, @timbo01 pointed out the disparity in collectible values between AMC models and those of more mainstream brands like Ford and Chevrolet, questioning the overall market value of the Marlin. The seller, @59caddyman, faced scrutiny over engine color changes, an issue emphasized by @Blocksteel, who questioned the motives behind repainting the engine incorrectly for the specific model year.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg highlights the gorgeous Midnight Blue paint of the Carrera S Cabriolet, while @GenauAutoWerks (The Seller) emphasizes the car's stunning appearance and low mileage, positioning it as a rare and desirable option. There are numerous compliments about the car's specifications, such as the upgraded Porsche PCCM Plus communication system, which enhances its usability without sacrificing the stock aesthetic. Additionally, commenters like @Edogg express appreciation for the overall period during which these models were produced, noting the unique color options available, making it an aesthetically pleasing vehicle.
Neutral: @GenauAutoWerks (The Seller) provides detailed descriptions of the vehicle's features and its auction status, inviting questions from potential buyers. Concerns about the car's IMS bearing have also been addressed, as the seller confirmed obtaining the engine number to clarify its serviceability. Other users, like @notlikelytowin4, inquire about the time investment in photography and the thoroughness of the car presentation, while @356splitwindow asks about paint condition and measurements, seeking additional transparency from the seller about the vehicle's history.
Negative: Certain comments reflect frustrations with vehicle maintenance and care, such as @Porschemcporschey993, who laments the frequent scrapes typically found on the undercarriage of nice cars, suggesting poor awareness from owners. @Enzoenzo raises skepticism about the eagerness of some bidders, implying a lack of genuine interest in the purchase, while @Mithril911 counters with a defense of the seller's reputation for offering quality products. Overall, these comments indicate a mixture of admiration for the vehicle alongside concerns about common pitfalls in ownership.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a high level of admiration for the 1949 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special, celebrating its classy design and historical significance. @Bordeaux emphasized the rarity and preservation efforts that have gone into this vehicle, while @roger.noble highlighted its status as a landmark in Cadillac history with the introduction of the OHV V-8 engine. @Dollycat3 described it as stylish and fabulous in its original condition, evoking excitement about its features and aesthetics. Commentators like @Hoppy18 and @Caseylesher appreciated the car's beauty and maintenance, underlining its appeal as a luxury vehicle used by high society.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed various aspects of the vehicle's specifications and practicality. @MotoMike and @Oakhurst raised questions about the car's hydraulic systems and drivability, indicating an interest in its performance. The seller, @rharm66, provided clarifications about the vehicle's heating system and fluid types used in its hydraulics. Additionally, @Toptime79 mentioned the aesthetic mismatch in paint on some parts of the car, suggesting a consideration of how this might affect its desirability in the auction. The mix of inquiries regarding technical details reflects a balanced interest in both appearance and functionality.
Negative: While overwhelmingly positive, the vehicle did receive some critical remarks. @Toptime79 noted a mismatch in paint that may deter some potential bidders, which suggests that not all aspects of the car might meet the expectations of collectors. @bvd expressed a more historical perspective, contrasting Cadillac's modern reputation with an appreciation for its earlier manufacturing precision, indicating some skepticism about the luxury brand's current image of innovation. These comments, while less frequent, highlight that not all viewers were fully convinced of the car's perfection or its alignment with traditional Cadillac values.
|
 |
Positive: @Jags_in_the_barn appreciates the MG as a charming vehicle that promotes leisurely travel, allowing drivers to experience beautiful backroads. @Lannis highlights the fun of driving such a car and the joy of being a spectator favorite. @meccano expresses love for these prewar sports cars, admiring their beauty and driving experience, while @pstopp describes the car as a little beauty and @Maroonedd finds it great, underscoring its visual appeal.
Neutral: Several comments bring up questions about the car's features and technical specifications, with @simon1966 asking about the functionality of the trafficators and restoration history. @ianjoub and @T.G.Miller discuss the battery details, indicating it is a single 12v system. @MGTOMMM shares insights on driving intricacies and technical aspects, providing a deeper understanding of the vehicle's mechanics and expected performance.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the vehicle's condition, particularly with @TheLotusGuy pointing out corrosion on the cam cover. @KAK69 mentions that the current tires seem inadequate, suggesting a need for better performance. @Valkyrja and @tsullivan ask for clarification on various aspects of the vehicle that indicate potential issues, such as the state of the valve cover and the health of engine components, which express some skepticism about its overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Uberpower and @Ridgerovers praised the vehicle's exceptional condition and appealing color, with @Uberpower expressing his appreciation for the P38 models that are becoming more visible. @1985RR shared his experience of selling a similar vehicle, deeming them reliable and great SUVs, while @Seaate20 mentioned the rewarding nature of owning classic cars, emphasizing that those over 100,000 miles are often the best maintained. @Mcfly1985, the seller, confirmed that the vehicle has been well-serviced and provided helpful information about its condition.
Neutral: There were inquiries regarding the vehicle's service history, particularly around the head gasket and HVAC functionality, with @Mcfly1985 confirming the recent heater core replacement. @Banger asked about the number of operating key fobs available, and @Mrhoppy and @Arh23 had specific questions about the windshield replacement and the condition of the interior surfaces, including the presence of any evidence of pets, to which the seller provided clarifications.
Negative: Concerns were raised about scratches observed on the center console and the possibility of pet damage, leading @Bug36T57 to speculate on the prior owner's treatment of the vehicle, while @Glen56 noted significant maintenance issues associated with the model over time. @Arh23's inquiries also implied doubts regarding the aesthetic condition of certain areas within the car, reflecting a cautious approach by potential buyers considering the vehicle's history and expected upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered enthusiastic responses, with @Uberpower expressing admiration for its design as a cool car and @ALFATodd reminiscing about their own thrilling experience driving it on the track. @rainnothing echoed similar sentiments, noting the fascinating history of the F355, while @The_Underhill_Account appreciated the rarity of a licensed plate for this model in California. Many commenters, including @plugzit (The Seller), highlighted the fun nature of the vehicle, assuring prospective buyers of an exciting driving experience.
Neutral: Several comments focused on specific technical aspects of the car. @bobzdar explained details about the quick ratio steering and its rareness, while @Profcarnut raised concerns about the expiration of the safety gear such as the harnesses and fire bottle. Questions about the vehicle's eligibility for various racing classes and its legal status in different states, including concerns about its safety inspection compatibility in California, were also discussed by commenters like @Tipo_R and @AirportXNA. @Lma5411 provided a thorough list of inquiries regarding the vehicle's parts and functions, which @plugzit (The Seller) addressed directly, clarifying modifications and setups.
Negative: Despite the overall excitement, some comments raised potential red flags about the vehicle. @Profcarnut pointed out that safety gear could be outdated, and @Lma5411 highlighted concerns about missing original parts and modifications that might affect the car's functionality. Although @plugzit (The Seller) reassured users regarding the car's racing setup, questions about street legality were raised by @AirportXNA, noting that certain equipment may not meet public road requirements. Overall, while the car is praised for its excitement and history, there are cautionary notes regarding its preparations for legal and safe operation.
|
 |
Positive: @amotorsports highlights the vehicle as a really nice low mileage Ram 2500 Power Wagon, emphasizing its robust 6.4L 'Hemi' V8 engine and appealing aggressive stance with numerous extras. The seller expresses enthusiasm for the ongoing bids and anticipates the potential selling price with optimism.
Neutral: @BobandLinda inquires about the maximum towing weight, to which @amotorsports responds that it is 10,000 lbs, indicating satisfactory towing capacity. Another comment by @Pepple79 asks about the suspension being adjustable, to which @amotorsports states that while the suspension isn't adjustable, lowering it with new springs is possible. Additionally, @Mugwumpy asks about modifications related to smog testing, and @amotorsports clarifies that no modifications will affect it, although a K&N cold air intake has been installed.
Negative: Concerns arise from @Mugwumpy about potential modifications to the vehicle's engine intake or exhaust that could impact smog testing, reflecting apprehension regarding compliance with environmental regulations. @c130driver seeks a video demonstrating the 4WD system and sway bar functionality, highlighting a demand for proof of the vehicle's capabilities, indicating a need for verification beyond the seller's assurance.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a shared nostalgia and love for the 1965 VW Beetle, with several users expressing admiration for its beauty and historical significance. @Max714 fondly reminisces about his first car, while @WJL2953 shares heartfelt memories of taking their driving test in a similar model. Many commenters, including @vwlover77 and @mick59, appreciate the vibrant Ruby Red color and the overall aesthetic appeal of the vehicle. @Kaltamu and @Ypss36 emphasize that the car is a beautiful choice for casual driving, allowing new owners to relish the experience of driving a classic Beetle - it's evident that the vehicle elicits positive emotions and connections among enthusiasts.
Neutral: The seller, @CompassRacing, provides detailed information about the Beetle's condition, history, and viewing options, aiming to facilitate interest from prospective buyers. They acknowledge the various comments regarding the vehicle, indicating that the refurbishment was done under prior ownership. Several users, including @passitbob and @cltlarry, bring attention to technical aspects and engine specifications, discussing both the features and minor discrepancies in the car's restoration. The overall tone reflects a mix of enthusiasm for the vehicle and an objective appraisal of its attributes, highlighting both its charm and areas of concern.
Negative: Despite the admiration for the Beetle, some comments point out noticeable flaws and areas for improvement. @ttbrinson and @CHS_Karl criticize the incorrect carpet and upholstery materials, and question the omission of chrome trim on the windows, deeming these aspects as integral to the car's overall look. Concerns about previous repairs, such as metal work in the spare tire area noted by @piepark68 and the fitment of fuel lines mentioned by @milage, indicate that some view the car's condition as requiring further attention. @Lagrassa expresses frustration with the critical nature of some commenters, suggesting that nitpicking can overshadow the appreciation for the classic Bug, which may discourage potential bidders and enthusiasts alike.
|
 |
Positive: @98-99Viperenvy highlighted the vehicle's beauty and nostalgia for the 1998 GT2 model, while @260TJ1967 appreciated the unique color combination and the exclusivity of the limited edition VOI cars. @Demon170 expressed love for the car, noting that its drivetrain remained untouched and praised it as one of the best-looking and highest horsepower stock Vipers ever made. @iLussoOC (The Seller) shared their experience of driving the car, emphasizing its fun nature and the attention it garners for its price, while others like @CurtisAdrian and @Btolar complemented the color combo and design.
Neutral: @iLussoOC (The Seller) provided updates on the vehicle's condition, confirming the recent oil change, brake fluid flush, and new tires, indicating that the car is ready to drive. @mig1980 inquired about the paint protection film, and @rschrum asked about the air conditioning's performance. The Seller assured that the AC is functioning well, blowing cold air, and clarified that the car does not have PPF but had been recently detailed. Commenters discussed the aftermarket parts with @ILLMAX1 asking for clarification on the previous modifications made to the vehicle.
Negative: There were some concerns raised around the car's documentation, with @trodat5440 pointing out that the original owner did not retain any paperwork related to the vehicle's uniqueness, specifically regarding the rare VOI 9 medallion. This lack of documentation could be a red flag for potential buyers. Additionally, there were concerns regarding the modification history, especially considering the mixed opinions about aftermarket components. @jpurcell21 also asked if there were any issues with the car, reflecting a cautious approach from potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the stunning appearance and rarity of the 996 Turbo, with several users expressing admiration for its condition. @Willybadger praised the vehicle's photography and overall aesthetic, calling it a handsome fella. @Carbine123 and @bmdaia echoed similar sentiments, with @Carbine123 calling the 996 Turbo amazing and @bmdaia noting the rarity of the manual coupe, emphasizing that only 7,000 were made globally. Others like @MrBCut and @tripledigit described the car as a work of art and exceptional, respectively, while @Sharlyn27 and @Mattdlevy commented on the beautiful color and overall appeal of the model.
Neutral: Several participants in the discussion sought additional information about the 996 Turbo, indicating a spirit of inquiry rather than outright enthusiasm or criticism. For instance, @OvenRude and @RobFL asked questions regarding the vehicle's history and condition, such as the damage to the bumper and repaint history. @some_dude raised various detailed and practical queries, including the functionality of the rear spoiler and the original state of the coolant lines. The seller, @McDeeb, engaged positively with these inquiries, offering transparency about the car's maintenance and past, which supports a neutral and informative atmosphere.
Negative: Some users expressed concerns about the vehicle's history based on the CarFax report and the nature of its 'accident' disclosure. @nate2046 voiced skepticism over the lack of detailed documentation regarding the accident and pointed out potential risks associated with the vehicle. @vegastoburque shared that many low-mileage cars have unsecured coolant lines, which could be a problem in the future. @Rambler_13 highlighted the ambiguous nature of the accident report but noted that it didn't uncover any new details. These comments suggest a cautious approach among some bidders regarding the car's potential issues.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg describes the Cord 810 Phaeton as a beautiful car with a nice design and thanks the seller. @Unimog2010 comments on the car's premium design and expresses admiration for its ahead-of-its-time features. @drbigworm simply states the design is iconic, while @ShineOn fondly imagines it paired with historic homes. @billyblyth appreciates the car's certification status and maintains its historical importance, wishing the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: @Tom810Cord (The Seller) responds to various questions, noting that the driver's door is not difficult to close and that the source of the fluid leak remains unknown. He reassures potential buyers that the car has never been smoked in, clarifying that the pack of cigarettes in the glove box was merely a nostalgic reminder. He shares experiences from driving the car and its reliability, and answers inquiries about shifting and color specifics, highlighting its beauty and operational history.
Negative: @Oldcarguy1965 raises concerns about the driver's door and potential fluid leakage, highlighting issues in the video. @1970ls5 questions if the car has been smoked in due to the presence of a cigarette pack. @yandaman calls for documentation about the motor and transmission rebuild, emphasizing their importance. @petersmotorcars asks about shifting issues, inquiring if the car has ever missed a shift, which could indicate potential concerns.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg praises the vehicle as being visually appealing, calling it a good-looking DBX. @ScottAlan appreciates the driving video created for the car, remarking that it showcases the vehicle well. @CaptainGUmbo expresses his enthusiasm by stating that he has ordered his third DBX, emphasizing the car's superiority over competitors like the Urus and Bentayga. He highlights the vehicle's excellent interior and impressive engine performance, and notes fewer electrical issues with the newer model.
Neutral: @barryf43 (The Seller) introduces the vehicle as a pristine 2021 Aston Martin DBX, detailing its specifications and features, including the inclusion of a hard-wired Valentine 1 radar detector and a wireless CarPlay adapter, both working flawlessly. He reassures potential buyers about the vehicle's reliability, mentioning minimal issues during his ownership and the reassurance provided by the Aston Martin CPO Warranty. He also commits to monitoring the auction comments and facilitating inspections.
Negative: @TexasMule raises concerns regarding the dashboard being replaced after three years, indicating potential reliability issues. @Mithril911 provides a cautionary note about the video regarding speedometer viewing and @1985RR expresses surprise that a 2021 vehicle requires a wireless CarPlay adapter, questioning the technology provided with the car. @BloodDragon discusses skepticism regarding the speed of the driving video, while @smellie2 questions the speed displayed along with the concerns about the vehicle's speed capabilities.
|
 |
Positive: @Vic (The Seller) describes the vehicle as running and driving really nice, expressing confidence in its quality. He mentions that recent maintenance was performed, including checking the brakes, changing fluids, and replacing subframe bushings. Additionally, the heater is noted to work well, and while the AC needs a recharge, the overall response indicates a well-maintained car.
Neutral: @Rockwhite asked about the maintenance history over the past three years, seeking specifics about any work done. @ctopherv inquired about the service history of the car and whether the timing chain has been addressed, as well as confirming details about the tires. @Vic (The Seller) responded by acknowledging the lack of detailed service records and confirming the tires are relatively new without any visible damage.
Negative: While @Vic (The Seller) highlights the car's positive attributes, there are caveats, such as the AC not blowing cold enough and missing service records about the timing chain. @ctopherv's concern about the timing chain and @Rockwhite's request for maintenance history suggest potential buyers are cautious about certain aspects, indicating a possible lack of confidence in the full history or performance of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @KevStang remarked on the incredible mileage of the vehicle, noting '1k miles in 17 years! That’s insane!'. @foqus expressed enthusiasm about the car, wishing to see a similar one available in the St. Louis area. @davek1661 praised the vehicle as a 'great little pony car' and indicated that it would attract attention. @borninthe60s shared a personal connection to first-generation Mustangs, recognizing the car's clean interior and stating it would be enjoyable to drive. @68_BRG_xke_ots complimented the car's original appearance and cleanliness, calling it 'a beautiful ’66 Mustang'. The seller, @Pattysloan918, provided assurance about the car's condition, stating it has no rust and is in excellent shape according to an appraisal.
Neutral: @Virafp raised several questions about the vehicle's specifics, such as potential rust under the trim and the condition of the spare tire, suggesting that pictures of the undercarriage could enhance its value. @AngryDan inquired about the possibility of a video showing a cold start, while @ChasinFords noted the car's modifications that present opportunities for personalization. @{JavierGarza} also requested additional pictures or videos of the undercarriage to assess its condition further. Several commenters expressed general interest in the vehicle without making strong judgments.
Negative: @REE2 pointed out that the vehicle might need new tires, signaling a potential concern about its upkeep. Concerns about transparency were raised by @68_BRG_xke_ots, who recommended more pictures to attract bidders and ensure that potential buyers have a comprehensive view of the car. The seller, @Pattysloan918, in response to misconceptions about the car's maintenance, explained that her circumstances prevented regular use of the vehicle. There were also critiques regarding the aftermarket tachometer, which detracted from the car's otherwise original look.
|
 |
Positive: @delaney51 noted that this 981 GT4 has a rare specification, particularly highlighting the inclusion of PCCB which is not standard for many models. @UKDM echoed this sentiment by mentioning that the early bids are indicative of a special car in excellent condition. Enthusiasts like @smb127 also appreciated the overall presentation of the vehicle, mentioning the gallery and information as well-represented, while @allabouteuro praised its driving capabilities, calling it a well-balanced and enjoyable ride, even comparing it favorably against other models like the 991.2 GT3.
Neutral: There were some discussions about specific features and maintenance aspects of the car. For instance, @btown1216 pointed out a potential discrepancy in the description regarding the suspension setup, while @track_spec inquired about documentation for the SharkWerks kit install. Multiple commenters, including @Notanothermiata, mentioned the need for clarity on brake pad replacements at relatively low mileage. The seller, @Worldclassmotorcars, actively responded to these queries, providing insights into service records and previous ownership, while addressing concerns raised about the rotor condition.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism regarding the car's condition and maintenance history. @Notanothermiata raised doubts about the necessity of brake pad replacements at just 4,500 miles, prompting questions about potential past usage, including whether the car had been tracked. @jschley commented on the brake pads' premature wear as an unusual point of concern. Additionally, @jerseydirt expressed apprehension over apparent grooves on the PCCB rotors, questioning the seller for more detailed images. Overall, these concerns indicate a need for potential buyers to perform thorough due diligence.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous commenters praised the vehicle, highlighting its nostalgic value and condition. @Jeffctsvman expressed fond memories of learning to drive on a similar model, while @Raffi pointed out that the early A-bodies are becoming harder to find and commended the car for being ready to drive and enjoy. @borninthe60s noted the Barracuda's good looks and color, emphasizing it as a vehicle to simply keep and enjoy driving. Others, like @Joetwink and @pacers35, recognized it as a great starting point for enthusiasts or a well-maintained classic ready for enjoyment.
Neutral: Comments reflected curiosity about specific vehicle details and mechanical issues. @gtrdave brought up the lack of the fender tag and various modifications suspected on the car. Several users, including @carfan1978 and @funmoneypit, inquired about the car's transmission and light functionalities, indicating a need for clarity on mechanical conditions. @campbecs (The Seller) responded multiple times to clarify certain aspects, explaining the car's history and recent services performed, aiming to provide transparency regarding its current state and upkeep.
Negative: Concerns were raised about potential mechanical issues and necessary repairs for the vehicle. @Valiantjim highlighted issues with the shifter and transmission compatibility, stating that the car's setup could pose risks if not properly managed. @Raptorman220 further suggested that a new transmission might be necessary. Additionally, users like @Frankzilla questioned the lack of attempts to repair the lights and shifter, implying that unresolved problems could affect the car's desirability and value. The seller, @campbecs, acknowledged these concerns while emphasizing the car's history and her intention for a smooth transfer to a caring new owner.
|
 |
Positive: @PaulH noted that the car includes rare chrome trim pieces and bakelite parts, which are hard to come by, making it a valuable project. @Vtec4ever expressed appreciation for the car as a classic enthusiast's vehicle that embodies the spirit of restoration. @The240zGuild praised the car's aesthetic, likening it to American designs but with a classy Italian flair, indicating its rarity and desirability.
Neutral: @cbjeep mentioned that the windshield on the car has minor imperfections but no cracks, suggesting it could be acceptable for a driver-quality car. @Doowopdann inquired about the engine's condition, to which @cbjeep confirmed it is free, indicating the car is mechanically functional. @Hollywoodcarguy commented on the enjoyable aspects of owning the car, highlighting its potential for both mechanical refreshment and complete restoration.
Negative: @zjawdat criticized the car's appearance, claiming it's not visually appealing outside of a niche fanbase. @BSTonetr6 pointed out the presence of duct tape in the pictures, implying that significant work will be needed to restore it. @WTX_HotRodder suggested that the car might not be a good investment, noting that fully restored versions might only fetch between $40k to $80k, and questioned the feasibility of restoration given the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the truck's aesthetics and overall condition. @seanfrontz referred to the vehicle as a 'pretty girl,' while @Ccole22 described it as 'absolutely gorgeous,' particularly praising the regular cab and long box design. @Atomic_Tomcat noted that the truck had been well-maintained over its 220,000 miles, indicating a history of good care from its previous owners. Also, @CarDogThreePedals highlighted the appeal of the two-tone paint, commenting on its nostalgic beauty.
Neutral: Several questions were raised regarding the truck's specifications and maintenance history. @JT77 inquired about any significant internal work on the motor and transmission, to which @AdamsPolishes (The Seller) responded with details about previous modifications and replacements. Additionally, inquiries about emissions equipment for Colorado by @twilliams1971 and the potential for shipping were discussed. @mander30 and @Osramicus also touched upon the truck's height in relation to standard garage doors.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the truck's overall value and condition. @PalmettoSC mentioned that the price might exceed their budget due to shipping costs and auction fees. Furthermore, @Davebrookins expressed curiosity about cabin odors, hinting at potential reservations due to previous ownership or maintenance issues. @Kazda88 and @Wilks noted discrepancies regarding the lift height of the truck, casting some doubts on its specifications. Overall, while many expressed admiration, there were notable apprehensions regarding the truck's market value and minor functional aspects.
|
 |
Positive: @Henhen11 (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm about selling a 95k mile 2004 Jeep Wrangler Sport TJ, highlighting its 5-speed manual transmission and the reliable 4.0 6-cylinder engine, stating it runs excellently and is ready for adventures. Commenters like @mspaulding88 praise @Henhen11 as a "jeep master," and others note the attractive 2018 JL wheels as a good modification. @Henhen11 reassures potential buyers about the Jeep's stock suspension and mentions including the original Ravine wheels, providing confidence in the vehicle's presentation and quality.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about the vehicle's condition and accessories. @MPETESS10 questions whether the Jeep has any lift installed for the larger tires, while @JJ-McClure brings up the nature of the sale as a private party transaction. @70at06043 asks for additional frame photos and confirmation of the tire dates. @Henhen11 answers these inquiries, stating there are no welds or patches and that he will provide further images to address the buyers' concerns, keeping the line of communication open.
Negative: Commenters express some concerns regarding the frame's condition and modifications. @Lees_Divine requests specific pictures of the front left area of the frame, suggesting it may look a bit rougher than expected. @Bryan1984 asks about the frame being rust-coated or painted, indicating apprehension about the frame's integrity, while @Drjay242 inquires about the functionality of the heating and cooling systems. These queries signify some hesitance from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlight the appeal of the 2018 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited, particularly praising its manual transmission and outstanding color. @gdspc expressed admiration for its design, noting it as a great-looking model with no reserve, while highlighting the significance of being the first year of the JL series. @FordForJason shared a personal experience, confirming that obtaining a hard top for this current generation is feasible, indicating that customization options are accessible.
Neutral: The seller, @Collectibleclassics, provides a detailed overview of their operations, emphasizing a commitment to transparent transactions and high customer satisfaction, as reflected in their Google Reviews rating of 4.9/5.0. They also mention the availability of services like vehicle inspections and logistics support for potential buyers. In response to a query from @TGwjacod-akota, the seller encourages community input regarding vehicle specifications, suggesting a collaborative approach to customer inquiries.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance surfaced, with @Merg1959 questioning the need to replace the clutch and flywheel after only 10,000 miles. In response, @MSP_MC pointed out that this service is likely due to a factory recall affecting manual transmissions of the 2018-2023 Wrangler models, suggesting that such extensive repairs are not uncommon for this particular vehicle.
|
Overland-Style 2022 GMC Sierra 2500HD SLT Crew Cab Duramax 4×4
1GT49NEYXNF158269
Lot 227369
Private Party
 |
Positive: @lsdills referred to the vehicle as a "very nice truck" with "very tasteful additions," highlighting its appeal. @JakeTheSnake115 mentioned that it is an AT4X model but noted its lack of unnecessary embellishments, which adds to its charm. Similarly, @Portland3 emphasized the impressive equipment of the truck, portraying it as a well-appointed vehicle. Additionally, @TooFarTim acknowledged the truck's base appeal, stating it was nice even without the Overlander add-ons, suggesting that these enhancements make it even more suitable for family adventures on weekends.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle displayed a favorable view toward its features and modifications, suggesting that it caters to a variety of needs without overwhelming aesthetics. Several commenters appreciated the truck's design and functionality while maintaining a sense of practicality for both everyday use and recreational purposes. This underscores a balanced perspective on the vehicle's capabilities and appeal.
Negative: While there are no overtly negative comments regarding the vehicle, the absence of critical feedback suggests potential viewers or bidders may lack specific reservations or concerns. However, the overall positive sentiment might overshadow any underlying doubts that some bidders could have about the truck's long-term performance or value.
|
 |
Positive: Comments reflect a strong admiration for the vehicle, showcasing enthusiasm for the 1997 Porsche Boxster and its driving experience. @UBMotorCo expresses intrigue about the car's quality, while @Gus1996 highlights the impressive selection of Porsches available from the seller, suggesting a trend of high-quality inventory. @RonMan2 emphasizes the importance of condition and the pure driving experience, advocating for maintenance to ensure enjoyment. This sentiment is echoed by @arerrac, who shares fond memories of a previous model, further building a positive perception of the brand's appeal. Overall, the feedback paints the Boxster as a desirable sports car that entices potential buyers with its compelling attributes.
Neutral: The vehicle's maintenance history, particularly concerning the IMS (Intermediate Shaft) bearing, raises questions that indicate a cautious approach among potential buyers. @NewUpper requests information on IMS work done, which @Collectibleclassics addresses by informing them of a lookup option for verification. Another commenter, @azguy238, inquires about the status of the clutch and flywheel replacements, showcasing a desire for detailed knowledge about the car's maintenance. The seller responds positively to these inquiries, demonstrating a willingness to provide necessary information, yet acknowledges the need for proper research before making any conclusions about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Some comments exhibit concern over specific aspects of the vehicle, particularly regarding its IMS maintenance schedule. @vwlove54 expresses doubts about the longevity of an IMS replacement given its recommended replacement timeline of every six years or 75,000 miles, while @Motor_Away shares worries over potential timing chain issues in aging models. Additionally, @B4buss voices hesitance about weather-related risks of putting the top down with a plastic window in cold temperatures, which reflects concerns about the car's usability in different conditions. Such comments reveal a cautious perspective on the long-term reliability and everyday practicality of the Porsche Boxster.
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) introduces the vehicle as a desirable 2009 Mercedes-Benz GL550 4MATIC with 46k miles, highlighting their dealership's strong reputation backed by a 4.9/5.0 rating based on numerous positive reviews. The seller emphasizes their commitment to transparency in transactions and offers various services, including inspections and nationwide shipping. The seller also acknowledges the contribution of the community, addressing comments and confirming aspects of the vehicle's features, contributing to a collaborative atmosphere.
Neutral: @peterx accurately points out that the vehicle's window sticker confirms the presence of the dual-range transfer case, prompting further discussion with @Tonehound, who expresses their eagerness to learn more about the GL series. @mlowengrub raises a question regarding the existence of a heated steering wheel, which leads to clarification from the seller that this particular vehicle does not have that feature. Concurrently, @jpburn3 and @olddatsun12 discuss the presence of third-row seats and provide assistance with photo references to ongoing inquiries, indicating a level of community engagement around the listing.
Negative: However, there is some confusion regarding the vehicle's features, particularly the dual-range transfer case, as several commenters like @Dalba4 and @jsloden contradict the seller's initial claims. @olddatsun12 raises concerns about unexplained noises in a driving video, suggesting a lack of clarity regarding the vehicle's condition. The interaction indicates some dissatisfaction among potential buyers, particularly towards the seller's handling of questions and the apparent sound issues that were not addressed thoroughly.
|
 |
Positive: @manofstealth appreciates the unique vehicles offered and expresses interest in the storage location. @Jeepmike notes the beauty of the car and hopes it sells for a fair price, indicating a trend of 1992 models coming to the market. @carney_tv describes the car as outstanding, suggesting a positive reception among bidders.
Neutral: Comments from @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) highlight transparency in their sales process and offer opportunities for inspections. Several users seek additional information on vehicle condition, with @ACRSNK asking about potential damage and missing paperwork. @CurtisAdrian notes the unusual occurrence of having two 1992 models from the same seller simultaneously, along with the need for improved photo quality for viewing details of the cars.
Negative: @351-CLEVELAND points out technical issues with video accessibility, while @Jeepmike raises concerns about the auction's presentation, specifically regarding the confusion created by the video's content. @ACRSNK questions various aspects of the car's condition and service history, revealing potential worries from buyers about cosmetic flaws and maintenance. @angelsauction and @Jeepmike both discuss market trends, suggesting that collector cars with historical significance might face challenges in valuation, indicating a softer market for display-only vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @SundayDriver59 has presented the 2010 Ford Mustang convertible as a well-maintained vehicle with a one-owner history, showcasing that it has been re-registered recently. The car has only 29,900 miles and is described as being in very nice condition with a like-new interior and a properly functioning convertible top. The Seller emphasizes the car runs and drives as expected and is ideal for leisurely drives, particularly on weekends, labeling it a perfect Sunday driver for an affordable price.
Neutral: @SundayDriver59 has engaged with the BAT community, responding to inquiries about the vehicle with transparency. The Seller plans to provide the original window sticker and Kelley Blue Book value assuming that bidders would establish their own valuation through bidding. @mrmustang and @IowaFarmBoy have both asked relevant questions about the vehicle's tire conditions and the convertible top's state, indicating an active interest in ensuring the car meets their needs for casual driving and vacation use.
Negative: @IowaFarmBoy expressed concerns regarding the original condition of the convertible top, asking if there is any fraying around the edges, which implies hesitation about the vehicle's maintenance. Additionally, questions about the functionality of tire pressure monitoring and the presence of warning lights raised doubts about the vehicle's reliability. @mrmustang also inquired about tire date codes and other potential faults, indicating that while there is interest, there are reservations that need addressing before a decision is made.
|
 |
Positive: Vehicle comments highlight its impressive features and performance. @Euro_Classica (The Seller) describes the 2015 Carrera S as an 'insane' car capable of cruising at 120mph effortlessly, with exceptional steering, precise shifter feel, and great clutch engagement. The suspension is noted for being tight, and the car is said to be in beautiful condition, ready for the next owner, which suggests a positive perception of the vehicle's overall quality. @Conw5254 also praises the manual transmission, referring to it as a 'real beauty', which indicates a strong appreciation for the car's driving dynamics.
Neutral: Several comments seek clarification and additional information regarding the vehicle's condition following an accident. @isill requests pictures and repair documents related to any prior damage, while @Conw5254 inquires if repairs were conducted at a Porsche certified facility. @JPStine appears uncertain about the car's color and location, demonstrating a neutral stance while seeking assurance. The seller, @Euro_Classica, responds to these inquiries, providing context about the repairs and acknowledging user suggestions regarding the car's details.
Negative: There are points of concern raised by some commenters regarding potential hidden issues with the vehicle. @Cappy1988 questions why the exhaust appears discolored, hinting at possible aesthetic or functional issues. Additionally, @981D4 identifies a discrepancy with the seller describing the car as a 6-speed instead of the actual 7-speed transmission, which could reflect a lack of attention to detail by the seller. @JeremeyStone expresses a desire for upgraded parts for better performance, but @W140 notes that the seller is still getting familiar with the car's specifics, which may imply a concern about the seller's knowledge and reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @Reconjr (The Seller) highlights that this Toyota Camper has potentially the lowest mileage left, emphasizing its excellent overall condition and readiness for use with a new predator generator. Commenters like @svatem express admiration for its age and low mileage, describing it as 'minty.' @jtmoser agrees, noting the rarity of the mileage and the charm of its slow speed, which he finds amusing.
Neutral: Several commenters have questions about specific features and repairs, such as @DanielGallagher asking about the rear axle and @CarletonScott inquiring about the air conditioning. @Scottedwards3 seeks information regarding the vehicle's registration and maintenance history, to which @Reconjr assures that documentation is available. There are discussions about the practicality of using it as an RV, with @Jbrown89 mentioning the unique positioning of the entry and hookups compared to typical US RVs.
Negative: Some concerns are raised by commenters regarding potential water damage, with @TessieB questioning if leaks have been addressed. While @Reconjr reassures that any issues with the roof have been resolved, including resealing, @sethbat questions the integrity of the frame based on a photo, which @Reconjr attempts to clarify. Additionally, @Jbrown89 mentions the possible costs associated with repairing the AC unit, warning that it may be easier to replace it entirely.
|
 |
Positive: @HB92647 describes their experience with the E450 version as exceptional, noting its sturdiness and reliability, comparing it to a bank vault. @BertCO recently acquired a 2012 E350 SportWagon and shares a positive experience, stating it drives like a new vehicle with zero issues, exemplifying the quality of Mercedes cars. @ba_reefer, the seller, expresses pride in their 2014 E350 Estate, highlighting its well-maintained condition with all maintenance performed by a qualified technician, and emphasizes its fuel efficiency and overall performance during personal road trips.
Neutral: @ba_reefer provides comprehensive information about the car's features and maintenance history, assuring potential buyers that all necessary work has been completed, including preventative measures. They confirm that the car comes with extra parts and detail responses to inquiries regarding its specifications, such as the absence of heated steering and the condition of the rear bumper paint. The seller is also transparent about the vehicle's past, mentioning that it was intended for personal use but is being sold due to space constraints.
Negative: @arjayp shares a negative experience regarding the massaging seat feature from their previous vehicle, indicating discomfort, even though they acknowledge the current car's good aesthetics. @2e671 raises a concern about potential paint chipping on the rear bumper, questioning its authenticity. Finally, some comments from potential buyers inquire about service records and the condition of various components, but the seller reassures that everything is in order, implying a lack of confidence from the viewers regarding the vehicle's maintenance history.
|
2001 Ford F-250 Super Duty Lariat SuperCab Power Stroke 4×4
1FTNX21F81EA54540
Lot 227378
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Johnathebar comments positively on the truck, noting its excellent condition with well-maintained paint, a clean interior, and a solid undercarriage. He expresses a desire for the truck but mentions needing a long bed instead. @Pablo1456 shares admiration for the truck, calling it his dream vehicle and remarking on its unique beauty and superior build compared to modern vehicles.
Neutral: @cdwidhalm (The Seller) addresses inquiries about the truck's condition, assuring potential buyers that no repairs are needed. The seller mentions a past issue with the fuel filter drain valve which was fixed promptly, confirming no further problems. @falcon50900 asks about any repairs that need to be made, indicating a conscientious approach to purchasing.
Negative: There are no overt negative comments from the commenters regarding the truck. The only concern raised by @falcon50900 seeks information on necessary repairs, which was addressed by @cdwidhalm (The Seller), indicating that there are currently no issues with the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's pristine condition and low mileage. @Brooklyn reminisces about the car's nostalgic value, while @Thomas54 appreciates the no reserve auction and labels the vehicle as stunning. @Rcjc1292 describes it as a beautiful car, and @Cincyfoxbody shares similar sentiments by calling it absolutely gorgeous. Several commenters note the car's historical significance, with @Z282SLO acknowledging its potential to bring in a significant sale price due to its excellent condition. @59caddyman, the seller, highlights the vehicle's immaculate original state, its flawless paint, and well-maintained interior, promoting it as a museum-quality piece. Overall, the vehicle evokes strong positive memories and excitement from potential bidders.
Neutral: Some comments focus on specific details and technical aspects of the vehicle without overtly indicating strong opinion. @jsadamski inquires about images of the headliner and radar detector installation, signifying the importance of transparency in the auction process. Commenters like @Uluze3 and @enchalata engage in discussions about unique features of this particular model, debating the original window sticker and elements like lumbar air bags. While others join in to provide insights into what the minor details represent, such as the blue plugs seen on the vehicle, the comments reflect a general interest rather than passionate opinions either way.
Negative: Contrastingly, several issues have been raised by commenters that diminish the vehicle's appeal slightly. @idrivemine critiques the aesthetic choice of painting parts of the exhaust system, calling for rectification due to the car's low miles and original status. @Bowtieguy007 challenges the presence of a radar detector in a car that hasn't seen much action, implying it might not fit the car's narrative as a pristine survivor. Concerns about the condition of the headliner arise as well, with @Bowtieguy007 and others suggesting it may need replacement, although @59caddyman defends its current state, indicating it does not require such actions. This blend of criticism offers a more nuanced view on the car's condition that potential bidders should consider.
|
 |
Positive: @gregoryindiana praised one of the rare Cayenne Diesels for its unique red leather interior, while @CarbonM expressed admiration for the vehicle's appealing options. The vehicle's impressive features include a high MSRP of $88,310 and an eye-catching Jet Black Metallic exterior paired with a luxurious black and garnet red leather interior. The seller highlights several premium options such as air suspension, heated multifunction steering wheel, and a panoramic roof system, all adding to its luxurious experience.
Neutral: Inquiries from potential buyers include questions about the maintenance of the diesel particulate filter (DPF) from @jnacaj and air suspension performance from @jasonhudnall. The seller, @genevamotorcars, assured that the air suspension is functioning correctly with no sagging, showcasing it through various height demonstrations. Furthermore, the seller indicated that a manual regeneration was performed to clean the DPF and that injector seals were replaced during routine maintenance. Also discussed was the commonality of oil cooler and valve cover leaks in this model, with all necessary repairs carried out by the seller.
Negative: Some comments indicate concerns regarding potential issues with the engine and repair history. @newusernamepending questioned leaks related to the rear main seal, to which @genevamotorcars assured that those problems are often misdiagnosed and clarified that the oil cooler gaskets and valve cover gaskets had been replaced, with no leaks reported. Additionally, @devlee asked about minor damage noted in the CARFAX report, to which the seller could only confirm that the damage was minor, estimated to be less than $500, although the seller provided reassurance about the vehicle's excellent condition and panel gaps.
|
 |
Positive: Throughout the comments, @BlueChipServices, the seller, highlights the unique qualities of the 645Ci, referring to it as a 'time capsule' and encouraging engagement and transparency regarding the vehicle's condition. The positive feedback also indicates that the seller is proactive in addressing inquiries about the inspection process and the handling of mechanical concerns, which helps build confidence among potential buyers. @BRP9937 mentions that the Head-Up Display (HUD) functions well, which is a reassurance for buyers seeking specific features in the vehicle.
Neutral: A significant portion of the conversation revolves around technical inquiries and clarifications. For instance, concerns are raised by @m9246043 regarding the sale of the vehicle after 16 months, and @ShoreGuy51 asks about the cause of the 'fluid seepage from the transmission pan.' @Colt45ML questions the recommendation about the seepage repair, which highlights the background of the vehicle's maintenance. The seller responds with detailed explanations about the inspection protocols and the severity rating of the issues noted, which seems to maintain a neutral tone throughout the discussion.
Negative: There are underlying concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, as noted by users like @Colt45ML who indicate that the transmission pan seepage issue and the vibrations during cold starts could lead to significant repair costs. @BRP9937 brings up doubts about the functionality of the HUD, and other commenters express uncertainty about visible issues in the video, such as blinking lights that are misinterpreted as malfunctions. This suggests a lack of confidence among some potential buyers about the car's reliability, further exacerbated by the seller's admission that there were minor concerns not deemed urgent for repair.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors expressed their admiration for the car, highlighting its great appearance, with @GDogg calling it a "great looking Turismo" and @choicedealsnc2017 stating that "these cars are amazing." Additionally, @Mnfrj (The Seller) explained that the suspension is in excellent condition, featuring a lift option for practicality, and noted that all electronic controls are functioning perfectly, creating a fantastic driving experience in the car.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about the car's features and history, including questions from @BobbyA. regarding any suspension service and from @MtnMadMan about the availability of a spec sheet. @dompulis raised a question about Apple CarPlay compatibility, which led to a detailed response by @Mnfrj (The Seller) describing the vehicle's technological capabilities. There were also discussions about past minor accidents during ownership, with @NJbusdriver and @davenchang seeking clarity on the specifics of these incidents.
Negative: Concerns surrounding the vehicle included @Lolamike30's inquiry about the transmission replacement, which seemed to raise questions about its reliability. @JohnR specifically asked about current warranties related to the replacement PDK, noting it as a significant issue, as well as @BobbyA.'s questions about any suspension issues that might exist. Overall, some potential buyers appear cautious about the vehicle's past and mechanical history.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the Honda CB750, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and craftsmanship. @jackmjason complimented the efforts of the seller in restoring these motorcycles, suggesting a high standard of work. @Superhawk65 and @moremoney2 both noted the bike's attractiveness, reflecting a sentiment of excitement and interest in the listing.
Neutral: The seller provided essential auction details, including shipping information and a reminder of the buying commitment. @rocketjohnny inquired about specific features of the exhaust and requested additional photos, reflecting the typical concerns potential buyers have regarding condition. The seller responded promptly with clarifications and additional imagery, reinforcing their willingness to assist interested bidders.
Negative: Some comments hinted at minor concerns, particularly regarding the exhaust guards. @moremoney2 raised a query about the paint finish, suggesting that it should be black, indicating a desire for authenticity in the refurbishment process. Additionally, the seller noted the presence of some light surface corrosion, which might be a point of concern for meticulous buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @borneo expresses admiration for the vehicle, noting its comfortable seats, impressive V-12 engine performance, and classic design, referring to it as a gentleman's tourer. @Eblesson offers encouragement for the auction and expresses hope that the car will find a new owner this time around, while @JarrodG72 speculates positively about the possibility of a successful bid by @mongokief. @Euro_Classica (The Seller) emphasizes the car's relisting due to the previous buyer's inability to complete the purchase, reassuring interested parties of their assistance throughout the auction process.
Neutral: Many commenters seek additional information about the car’s condition and history. @Dasher16 and @Wckrieger inquire about the car's keys, manuals, and previous repossession details, while @Mainesailor asks for a video highlighting any imperfections. @gchristmas3 also requests videos and records of the last service, indicating potential buyer diligence. @Fcorallo and @consultant8985 question the reasons for the previous auction's failure, showcasing a blend of interest and concern regarding the auction's transparency and clarity on vehicle history.
Negative: Several comments raise concerns about the car's history and current condition. @Eyedoc55 questions why the car is being auctioned again, hinting at skepticism about its desirability. @Fcorallo suggests that the previous auction winner may have uncovered something concerning, while @cdcooper presses for confirmation on the motor and transmission's status post-repossession. @fredwilke's comment about the original bidder's challenge with shipping costs could indicate potential lingering worries about the car's logistics and value.
|
 |
Positive: The 2004 Lexus LX470 is touted as a beautiful example of luxury vehicle design, with a striking Galactic Gray Mica color that is said to look even better in person, especially in sunlight. @Tnbusiness71 (The Seller) emphasizes its impressive build quality, noting that it retains its outstanding features after more than 20 years, showcasing that it meets the expectations of a vehicle that was once priced above $100,000 CAD. Several comments reflect appreciation for the vehicle's history, having spent its life in a mild climate in British Columbia, which is said to have helped minimize underbody corrosion. The comprehensive inspection and careful maintenance add to positive remarks around its overall condition and service history.
Neutral: There are several inquiries surrounding the vehicle’s maintenance records and specifics of its construction history. Commenters, including @MasterMarine and @QuoVadis, seek details about the recent service work completed prior to the auction and clarity on the integrity of the replacement instrument cluster, as it was changed to show miles instead of kilometers. @AlMontana and @David_P ask logical questions regarding timing belt and water pump maintenance and the legitimacy of the vehicle’s title, reflecting the complex nature of importing vehicles between Canada and the US. These comments, while neutral, indicate potential buyers' due diligence when considering their purchase.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly with visible damages noted by @illLegit. Comments indicate that there are dents on the right front door and left rear door, and further requests were made for high-quality photos and clarity around these issues. @Tate05 expressed confusion about the vehicle's Arkansas title despite its Canadian origins, which, alongside the lack of clear images showcasing all damages, points towards transparency issues that could affect buyers' confidence. Some users, like @Cleareddirect, were explicit about needing clear pictures of all damage, emphasizing a lack of thorough presentation that could deter potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @brooksgn mentioned the vehicle's rare purple color, praising how incredible it looks in person. @rituximab, who owns a 2020 model, expressed satisfaction with his vehicle's engine performance, stating it is powerful and reliable when maintained well. @Matthijs described the truck as awesome, and @OllieinAZ supported his enthusiasm, encouraging him to win the auction and take pictures of it in iconic locations in the Netherlands, highlighting the fun of owning such a large vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @genevamotorcars, provided a road test video and answered questions regarding the vehicle's engine and maintenance. They acknowledged that the 2015-2020 Cadillac Escalades and Yukon Denalis share the same engine, mentioning it can have lifter issues if not maintained properly but is generally more reliable than newer models. They also confirmed some details about previous ownership, maintenance done on the vehicle, and addressed inquiries about the turn signals.
Negative: @Heathta raised concerns about the reliability of the engine, recalling issues with their own 2015 Yukon XL, which influenced their decision to sell. @hbsmith052 asked for maintenance records and pictures of past accidents, indicating unease about the vehicle's condition. @matthijs's comments about the hurdles faced when importing such a large vehicle to the Netherlands, including high taxes and registration costs, reflect the challenges of owning this type of vehicle in a densely populated area.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters are enthusiastic about the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and condition. @nsoave remarked, "Beautiful truck!" and @Dollycat3 referred to it as a "sweet Suburban." The seller, @AngelsMotors, emphasized that the 2002 Chevrolet Suburban 1500 Z71 is well-maintained, in excellent condition, and offers good mileage for its age. Additionally, the truck has a solid service history with all maintenance done at an official Chevrolet dealership, further bolstering its reputation as a reliable choice.
Neutral: Several inquiries about the vehicle suggest interest but also some need for clarification. Commenters like @BNed requested information about shipping estimates, indicating that transportation logistics may affect their bidding decisions. @ronsstuff and @Beau94428 sought details regarding damage history, to which @AngelsMotors responded with clarifications about the Carfax report, asserting that the vehicle has not been involved in accidents but did have some cosmetic damage from auction inspections and the California climate.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly about the seating and exterior elements. @alupasa noted discrepancies in the leather condition of the front seats, suggesting that they appeared off, while @connorscorbett pointed out that the driver's seat was previously damaged and had been recently re-covered. These comments reflect a degree of skepticism about the vehicle's interior quality, contrasting with the positive remarks about its overall aesthetic and performance.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's unique color and overall condition. @Rumbling noted that the color is not commonly seen, describing the Z3 as beautiful, while @Button referred to the hue as lovely. @Randy_Forbes pointed out the rarity of the color, low mileage, and quality features, suggesting that someone would be getting a nice car. @Mirthmobile shared excitement by noting Randy's approval, which adds credibility to their positive reception. @TONEPUB and @pbjely reinforced the car's appeal, with @pbjely acknowledging its gorgeous color.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the car's mechanical and service history. @Tip provided a practical tip regarding the use of windshield washer fluid that could stain the canvas top and recommended a distilled water and alcohol solution instead. @pbjely, while admiring the color, raised questions about the Carfax report, service history, and expected maintenance needs, specifically inquiring about the operational status of the power top. @4byFreak (The Seller) shared details about the car's condition, mentioning that it drives phenomenally and is one of the cleanest vehicles they have owned at 45k miles.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the lack of complete documentation regarding the car's components. @TOMRD expressed confusion over the specifications listed on the window sticker and questioned the details about the limited-slip differential (LSD) not found on the build sticker despite it being referenced in the description. @Bmwz3 also inquired about potential exterior wear, such as door dings or scratches, and raised concerns about the replacement of seat bushings and the original condition of the top. Although overall reception was positive, these inquiries highlighted potential uncertainties that prospective buyers should consider.
|
 |
Positive: @watergate528 commented with a brief "Nice," reflecting a positive impression. @Vette2 expressed appreciation for the classic sound of the motorcycle’s 2-cycle engine, reminiscing about great memories and describing the bike as a nice piece of classic history. @rocketrod94533 shared a personal connection, stating this was the bike they wanted in the past, highlighting a sense of nostalgia and desire to own it now.
Neutral: In an informative update, @Wonder32, the seller, acknowledged a comment about their shifting technique during the bike's performance video, clarifying that they intentionally kept RPMs lower to capture audio quality. They also addressed concerns about the transmission, reassured potential buyers of recent inspections, and committed to sharing further video content demonstrating higher RPM performance. Additionally, @Wonder32 mentioned they had reinstalled the OEM Airbox and filter housing for the final auction push, inviting further questions and stories from the community.
Negative: @shoggy1970 raised concerns regarding the shifting technique in the riding video, mentioning possible issues with the transmission and clutch, as well as technical accuracy in the tachometer reading. This critique hinted at potential reliability worries for viewers considering a purchase. Overall, while some commenters expressed enthusiasm, potential doubts about the vehicle’s mechanics were noted.
|
 |
Positive: @thrill_of_the_hunt expressed enthusiasm about the bike, noting it was a labor of love with great attention to detail and design, emphasizing the owner's thorough mock-up process before final assembly. @Searle804 highlighted the bike's motor as a work of art, praising the overall build while others, like @Motogrotto, pointed out impressive upgrades and high-quality custom parts from Flatracer. The bike has also garnered appreciation for its unique aesthetic, especially the S-style fairing that adds character and style.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the unique seating arrangement, with @madrid100 inquiring about comfort for two riders. @Palomar2 mentioned that while it's a great seating option for a solo rider, it may not be comfortable for two unless both riders are small and close friends. @Ant5842 confirmed that the seat is a "3/4 solo seat," catering more to single riders. The bike's history was also mentioned by @BeemerNut, who asked about the transmission, which @thrill_of_the_hunt indicated was rebuilt alongside the motor, noting the challenges in sourcing new parts.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the bike's details, such as @marovellil's observation of a potential crack near the carburetor. @thrill_of_the_hunt clarified this was an illusion caused by the floor and reassured interested buyers about the bike's condition by mentioning the availability of supporting receipts for the build's quality and care. There was also a note of confusion about the bike's designation, with @MCAdvRider pointing out that the VIN indicated it was an R100 build, not an R100S, which could mislead some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle in question is a 2015 Porsche 911 Targa 4S that has garnered admiration from potential buyers for its pristine condition and low mileage of 13,328. The seller, @Nahasmotorcars, describes it as 'LIKE NEW' and boasts a perfect service history, with records up to date. Commentors like @dfsavgny and @emanrace have expressed their affection for the car, noting its stunning color combination and the exceptional driving experience of the 911 models. Additionally, @B.Fryk shares a favorable review from a personal ownership perspective, highlighting the impressive craftsmanship and driving dynamics of the Targa model.
Neutral: While some buyers display enthusiasm for the vehicle, there are practical concerns expressed by others. @Helmethead brought up previous front-end damage noted on the Carfax report, prompting a clarification from the seller. @Kubes40 and others engaged in a conversation regarding the car's transmission, indicating a preference for manual versus automatic options, though opinions vary widely. Comments such as those from @LawDog question the absence of features like sports chrono or heated seats, suggesting that expectations around standard equipment may differ among buyers.
Negative: Some comments reflect disappointment or skepticism regarding the vehicle. For instance, @lowellperry highlighted the absence of heated seats as unusual for a Targa, while @blackrider voiced concerns about retrofitting such features. Additionally, @xpensivewino pointed out a potential flaw in the roof seal in the photos, which the seller quickly addressed. @PacketNarc expressed frustration about competitive bidding dynamics, while others like @kubes40 shared a nostalgic regard for manual transmission vehicles, implying that the two-pedal configuration of the Targa could detract from its appeal for certain buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @jacksongalloway expressed amazement at the vehicle, highlighting its attractive qualities, while @portcarling01 praised the CR-V as one of the finest built automobiles, noting their reliability and dependability. @bry593 agreed, commenting on the vehicle's lack of concerning rust and its potential for longevity with basic maintenance, emphasizing that first-generation CR-Vs do everything well and are ideal for practical use. Sellers like @testdummypilot reassured potential buyers by providing extensive details about the condition of the car through numerous photos and videos, and mentioned a free warranty to boost buyers' confidence.
Neutral: The @testdummypilot (The Seller) acknowledged the challenges of purchasing a vehicle online, emphasizing their family's long-standing reputation in the business since 1946 and their commitment to transparency. They addressed potential concerns about maintenance and repairs, particularly regarding the timing belt, and offered to assist with any service needed for the new owner. Additionally, the seller noted their open communication style and willingness to address any issues post-sale, reinforcing their aim to create an easy and accommodating purchasing experience.
Negative: @MrRenrut inquired about the timing belt replacement, reflecting concern over used car maintenance. @PPvD mentioned that although they wouldn't bid on the auction, they shared their own experiences with an older vehicle, implying reservations about the auction's offering not matching their high standards. Furthermore, @bouncefactor's question regarding the functionality of the air conditioning and other power equipment suggested hesitance about the vehicle's operating condition, indicating that some potential bidders may require reassurance about reliability before committing.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their appreciation for the vehicle, including @Dialup88, who described it as a beautiful truck, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @tktewindsor (The Seller) also noted that the engine runs well after warming up, suggesting reliability which could be an attractive feature for potential buyers.
Neutral: @WIZZZZ inquired about the vehicle's tuning requirements, asking whether it needs adjustments to the carburetor or timing. This indicates an interest in the vehicle's performance and maintenance needs, suggesting that while it's in good condition, there may be some considerations for future enhancement. The discussion about the iron heads and engine leaks further reflects a desire to understand how the vehicle functions.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding potential performance issues, as @btb suggested that adding fuel injection and a 700R4 transmission could improve the vehicle's mileage to around 10 MPH. Additionally, @WIZZZZ asked about leaks and the condition of the engine, implying uncertainty about the vehicle’s overall reliability. Although @tktewindsor (The Seller) mentioned that the carburetor is new and that the engine runs with minimal leaks, the inquiries suggest that there are underlying concerns that some potential buyers might find discouraging.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors have expressed excitement about the vehicle, with @psg559 noting its appealing Signal Red color, which stands out among S2 2+2 models. @2hot2trot appreciates the car's honest condition and sees it as an attractive option for potential buyers. Another favorable comment from @Ripper highlights that the air conditioning works well in Texas heat and applauds the vehicle's nice restoration thus far.
Neutral: Some commenters, like @MacGyver55 (The Seller), have shared detailed responses about the car's features and maintenance history. @dieselpilot asked about specifics regarding the power steering and A/C system, showing curiosity about its performance and care. Additionally, @robjoepayne1 remarked on the car's appearance, referring to it as a 'very good looking original car', which sparks interest about its mileage history and maintenance.
Negative: Conversely, there were concerns raised by commenters like @dieselpilot, who pointed out imperfections in the paint job and questioned its adherence to the body. Likewise, @YaRight inquired about any necessary front suspension work, indicating a need for further inspection. There is also skepticism, as raised by @CoastsideCat, questioning the importance of specific features like the stereo system in a driving video, reflecting some personal preferences that might detract from the vehicle's overall appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @molzent has received positive feedback about the 1996 Dodge Ram 3500, with @cplwojtek praising the meticulous care it has received, highlighted by the handwritten logbook of service work. The original owner, identified as a passionate 'car guy', kept the vehicle in excellent condition, and @molzent assures interested buyers of its well-maintained state, noting that all functionalities, including A/C and cruise control, operate perfectly. The absence of rust, coupled with the truck's service history, reinforces the perception of its quality and the reliability of the legendary Cummins 12V diesel engine, making it highly sought after.
Neutral: The truck is equipped with a Reese 5th wheel hitch, which the previous owner reportedly only used a few times for towing a camper. @molzent confirmed the inclusion of all necessary towing accessories and a factory receiver, responding to queries from prospective buyers about the truck's capabilities. There were questions about the truck's four-wheel-drive capability, confirmed as a 4x2 by @molzent, and the maintenance questions from potential buyers demonstrated an interest in its service history and overall operation.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the truck's maintenance records, with @mustangfan777 questioning the lack of service updates since 2018 and expressing skepticism about its condition due to low mileage. There were inquiries regarding the age of the tires, potential fluid leaks, and the condition of the batteries, indicating that not all potential buyers are convinced of the truck's readiness for use. @dlc_amp inquired about the KDP installation, reflecting uncertainty among buyers about the specifics of the vehicle's condition which might affect their purchasing decision.
|
 |
Positive: @VantageAuto highlights the vehicle as an exceptional offer, boasting a beautiful color combination and a turbo diesel engine that provides an enjoyable driving experience with impressive low-end torque and fuel economy. With only 72k miles, it is positioned as a long-lasting option, complemented by a well-maintained body and interior. The car's ability to seat four comfortably, along with its loaded features including a quality sound system, makes it a standout choice in its category. @Button expresses appreciation for the uniqueness of this convertible diesel in the market, suggesting it is a rare find.
Neutral: @GageDave and @Eboy999 engage in a technical discussion about the vehicle's platform, clarifying that the Beetle is based on the MK6 Golf rather than the MK7 Golf. They note the differences in suspension and performance, with @GageDave sharing his experience with the reliability of his own diesel MK6 Golf. The dialogue reflects a technical curiosity about the vehicle's engineering, indicating a community of enthusiasts who are interested in the subtleties of Volkswagen's designs.
Negative: Some comments suggest a nostalgic tone towards the Volkswagen Beetle and a recognition of changes in VW's manufacturing decisions, particularly @GageDave's remark about VW cutting corners with the MK7 Golf TDI, implying a decline in quality and performance. However, no outright negative opinions are shared about the specific vehicle being sold, reflecting a predominantly positive or neutral discourse among the commentators.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the vehicle's impressive mechanics, particularly its powerful 3.2 engine and reliable performance after a recent service. @beckseuropean (The Seller) notes that the car runs beautifully, with a functioning cold A/C even in extreme heat conditions. Long-term Arizona ownership is also seen as a plus, suggesting that the car has avoided common rust issues. Commentors like @LakeCleElum and @Hi_Fi_Guy appreciate the potential of this Targa for future customization and acknowledge the value added by the engine swap, viewing it as an ideal blank canvas for enthusiasts.
Neutral: Some comments reflect on the vehicle's overall condition and highlight the need for cosmetic repairs. @gshunnar and @Floridalime engage in a discussion about the car's factory color, while @Frank_Barrett mentions the cosmetic needs despite acknowledging that the car appears solid underneath. @porkchop1 raises a question about the original motor's condition, indicating that some mechanical aspects may require attention, yet the responses suggest that the vehicle is still a worthwhile project.
Negative: Criticism appears regarding the vehicle's restyling and some signs of rust. @G suit questions the claim of being very rust-free, pointing out visible rust signs on the door trim and battery boxes. @ninavich expresses surprise about the A/C's performance given the lack of visible condensers. @porkchop1 and @jaydubau convey concerns about the durability of the transaxle and the previous engine's conditions. Overall, there are reservations about the car’s exterior state and whether the cosmetic issues could deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Drager54 noted that the truck is not a show vehicle, but reassured potential buyers that it runs and drives well, emphasizing that it's a solid option. @AdamY expressed appreciation for the classic 90s color and the GMT400 model, indicating a preference for a good, dependable truck, even if it's not perfect. Buyers seem to value the functional aspect of the vehicle over visual aesthetics, as reflected in the responses.
Neutral: There were requests for more detailed images, specifically of the door sills and cab corners, to evaluate the condition of the truck further. @AdamY pointed out some concerns regarding the appearance of unpainted body patches and mismatched paint on different sides of the truck. @Module also made observations about various finishes on the undercarriage, suggesting discrepancies in how the truck might be expected to look compared to what is visible in the photos.
Negative: @AdamY raised some red flags about the truck's condition, mentioning what appeared to be overspray on the rack arms and the overall mixed paint job. @Module pointed out that the undercarriage looked different than what would generally be expected for a GMT400, indicating that some components might have been improperly finished or sprayed. There seems to be uncertainty among potential buyers regarding the actual condition of the vehicle relative to what is presented in photographs.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle being auctioned is a stunning 2019 Audi A6, noted for its powerful 3.0L V6 engine, luxurious features, and low mileage of 59k. @aegmotorsports has proudly shared its extensive list of premium features including multiple climate control zones, heated and ventilated seats, and advanced safety assist technologies such as lane assist and blind-spot monitoring. Commentor @MichaelKirschmann describes it as a beautiful car, echoing the seller's enthusiasm for its immaculate condition and comprehensive equipment.
Neutral: The seller has addressed concerns regarding the vehicle's interior materials, clarifying that while there is Piano Black trim, the vehicle still includes Natural Dark Brown Walnut Wood trim, maintaining its luxury aesthetic. Additionally, @Max5 raised a question about an existing recall, to which @aegmotorsports confirmed it pertains to a new software update related to the backup camera. They assured potential buyers that the vehicle's rearview camera is functioning properly and that the recall can be addressed by the dealer at no cost to the new owner.
Negative: There are mixed feelings about some design choices in the vehicle's interior. @MichaelKirschmann expresses a slight disappointment regarding the Piano Black trim, which he feels is prone to collecting dust and scratches. This sentiment raises questions for potential buyers about the long-term maintenance of the vehicle's aesthetic appeal. Furthermore, @NWS inquires about the tire conditions and age, suggesting that there is some concern about the overall preparedness of the vehicle for immediate use.
|
 |
Positive: The 2012 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 has garnered a lot of admiration from various commenters, with many expressing their excitement and appreciation for the car's design and performance. @Super60 mentioned working on the vehicle, highlighting its impressive build from the Oshawa plant, while @JordanW1993 and @Gmula5 conveyed their enthusiasm by calling it 'sick' and their 'dream car.' The fact that this ZL1 only has 193 miles adds to its allure among car enthusiasts and collectors, as articulated by the seller @CollectorShop, who noted the car's rarity and limited production of just 1,971 units.
Neutral: Several commenters provided insights about the vehicle’s history and features. @MS3DALE and @Super60 engaged in a friendly discussion about the ZL1's attributes and the pride associated with working on it. The seller, @CollectorShop, shared detailed vehicle information and specifications, emphasizing factors like the car's unique delivery history and its impressive Nürburgring lap time. This contributed to the overall appreciation of the vehicle's engineering and its position among contemporary supercars, creating a knowledgeable atmosphere in the comments.
Negative: However, there were some concerns mentioned about the vehicle's maintenance history. A comment by @Stapescrew raised questions about when the last oil change occurred and the frequency of its use, pointing out the importance of such details for potential buyers. While some commenters like @mrtew praised the appearance, concerns over maintenance were echoed in the inquiry about whether the ZL1 had been properly maintained and driven regularly, which could affect buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @FineCarsLLC has presented a 2007 Mercedes C230 Sport sedan that has garnered praise for its beauty and low mileage. @Dollycat3 called the car beautiful, emphasizing its attractive aspect which aligns with the seller's commitment to quality. Additionally, @nvcarriere shared positive experiences from owning a 2007 C230, highlighting its reliability and the joy it brought throughout its lifespan, suggesting it as one of Mercedes' best models.
Neutral: Some commenters raised questions regarding specific features and details of the car, such as @Smonyse inquiring about the term 'revised lower bodywork' and @96sl500 asking if the vehicle has Bluetooth capability. The seller, @FineCarsLLC, responded promptly to these inquiries, offering clarity about the car's features. The discussion also touched upon the car's performance, with @1Marauder describing its solid feel at high speeds and praising its suspension, thus highlighting its capabilities without throwing a definitive judgment on the vehicle as a whole.
Negative: Concerns arose regarding the number of previous owners, as @Jimwilliams1977 pointed out that having six owners for a low mileage vehicle seems excessive. They also questioned the inconsistency in service records, noting limited fluid services aside from the transmission, which may imply inadequate maintenance over the years. Additionally, @nvcarriere mentioned that while the car lasted a long time, it eventually required significant repairs, indicating potential long-term issues with the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @RMBschultz praises the truck's appeal, noting its condition and that it is likely to sell for a substantial amount. @beauparker81 admires the truck's beauty and emphasizes the seller's careful sourcing of low-mileage Toyotas, highlighting the challenge in finding vehicles like this. @GV1390 shares a fondness for their own 4Runner, citing its reliability even after extensive mileage, aligning with the reputation of this model. @sackboy gives a strong recommendation for the seller, reflecting positive past experiences and underlining their professionalism.
Neutral: @Got4wd questions the reason for the quick sale after purchase, which prompts some discussion among other commenters about potential intentions behind the listing. @Ptrem inquires about the truck's heated seats, while @mdoyle24 asks about the timing belt and confirms it was recently changed, showing interest in its maintenance history. The seller, @Beerguy, addresses queries about specific features of the truck, maintaining engagement with potential buyers, and acknowledges the feedback with gratitude.
Negative: There are hints of skepticism, particularly from @jacarter3, who feels the vehicle is too pristine to use for adventure and expects bids to exceed $20k but is searching for a better price elsewhere. There's no outright negativity towards the truck itself, but the hesitation reflects a concern regarding its practicality for daily use. However, @Beerguy remains optimistic, assuring potential buyers of the truck's quality despite the few minor imperfections mentioned.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's design and engineering, particularly highlighting the appeal of the Round Wheel Arch and the 1275 engine. @billmg31 mentions that this Midget runs great and is a great starter car. @David_C. describes it as a holy grail of Spridgets, emphasizing that it’s ready to be enjoyed and not merely a project. Several users recall fond memories of their own Midgets, such as @Yenpit, who reminisces about customized features and improvements made over the years, while @200mph notes the Midget's reputation as an inexpensive collector car with a high 'Smiles per Mile' ratio.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's classification as a project car are mixed. @TunaJ points out the potential hidden issues that could arise from not having a well-documented maintenance history and shares his experience of unexpected costs incurred after purchasing a different Midget. @joeveto and @bachldrs both question why the car is labeled a project car, suggesting that all vintage vehicles have room for improvement. The sentiment is that while there may be some work required, the car remains in decent condition overall, with room for cosmetic fixes and maintenance.
Negative: There are notable concerns about mechanical issues and corrosion among several commenters. @freakinutz and @joeveto highlight potential malfunctions such as a non-working tachometer, while @Rchuck expresses frustration over the seller's lack of response to questions. @TunaJ warns that hidden surprises could lead to significant repair costs, reflecting a cautious approach to the purchase. The existence of rust, particularly around the base of the A-pillars, is also flagged by @ptegler as an area of concern, raising doubts about the overall integrity of the vehicle despite its attractive features.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received a lot of praise from potential buyers and current owners alike. @bdunnco highlighted its beauty and noted that these 981 S Porsches are underrated, likely to increase in value due to their performance as a mid-engine 911 roadster. @JAY-Z emphasized its reliability and excellent power-to-weight ratio at 315 hp, while others like @scbarr and @convertparts also shared their enthusiasm for the car's performance and practicality. The seller @W.Glen has been proactive in communicating and has provided extensive history and servicing information about the car, enhancing buyer confidence.
Neutral: The vehicle's maintenance history and condition have come under scrutiny, with comments from @Dblcluchit and @mrmustang inquiring about major services completed, particularly regarding the PDK service and oil changes. @Glenn930 raised a question regarding the receiver hitch's history, indicating a curiosity about its past use, while several users like @cromie and @GW.Huffalo discussed potential maintenance issues regarding the suspension and other aspects. However, the seller offered detailed insights into the service history and reassured potential buyers about the vehicle's upkeep.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition have been voiced, particularly around the suspension and any possible over-rev occurrences. @DereksB and @cromie questioned whether a suspension refresh was needed given the vehicle's mileage. Moreover, @mrmustang raised doubts around the DME over-rev report in relation to possible previous hard driving or track usage, while @michael5155 expressed worry about potential transmission issues due to lack of documented service history. Despite these concerns, @W.Glen has responded openly to these queries, yet the perceived lack of clarity around certain details may deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @davidhunternyc described the vehicle as a very clean low-mileage car that is coveted, with a color that suits Hawaii perfectly. @expletive reflected on their past experience with a 2003 325i, expressing their love for that model, and praised the car’s color and mileage. @gmtbend mentioned the long drive home but commended the car and its miles, predicting that it could have 200K more miles and 20 years of service ahead, while @67bmer indicated interest in the car for their own needs, finding it very nice for an auction item in Hawaii.
Neutral: @ctsimpson11 (The Seller) provided logistical information regarding shipping costs, stating that shipping to the east coast is approximately $2500 and to the west coast is around $1000. They confirmed that the car can be registered in Hawaii with a California title but took steps to ease the process for potential buyers by transferring registration to Hawaii. @ctsimpson11 also engaged with potential buyers by answering questions about the car’s condition, including its rust status, confirming no rust was found as it had been garage-kept.
Negative: @jjo84594 raised concerns about rust due to the car's location in the Pacific, while @bmw_jeff sought clarification on the emissions model status, unsure if it was still a California title. @GoToreros2025 asked about the sunroof and key fob functionality, implying potential concerns about issues with the vehicle, demonstrating the buyers' cautious approach to considering the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg describes the vehicle as absolutely stunning, particularly praising its 12 spoke wheels. @Euro_Classica (The Seller) welcomes potential buyers to the auction, highlighting the 2006 Bentley Arnage R as regal and fit for royalty, noting its smooth driving performance and luxurious features such as solid wood rear tray tables. They emphasize that the car runs excellently and pulls powerfully on the highway, suggesting it is a special and handsome vehicle that commands attention.
Neutral: @Manistee asks about the vehicle's MPG before placing a bid, indicating some practical concerns about fuel efficiency. @kgishere reflects positively on the Arnage but mentions reliability as a factor to consider. @SnookMemphis notes the redline of 4600 RPMs, questioning whether the low-end torque is significant for performance while @Jmay77 confirms the high low-end torque due to the L series engine's specifications, briefly discussing its history and longevity in Bentley's lineup.
Negative: @Frank_Barrett finds the flashy chrome wheels to be a downside, stating that Bentleys should maintain a level of subtlety. @MikeCesario raises a concern about mixed tire brands on the vehicle, labeling it a red flag which might imply potential issues. Overall, there appears to be some unease regarding the vehicle's appearance and condition despite its otherwise positive reception.
|
 |
Positive: @Akamai1 expressed enthusiasm by calling the vehicle a 'Beauty!!!' highlighting its appeal. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) provided detailed insights on the vehicle, emphasizing the vehicle's zero rust condition with a video showcasing common rust-prone areas. The seller also reassured potential buyers that they are available for questions and willing to assist throughout the auction process, indicating a customer-centric approach. Additionally, the seller mentioned their high customer satisfaction rating with a 4.9/5.0 average based on numerous reviews, showcasing their credibility in the vehicle selling market.
Neutral: @KidAtlantic pointed out that there was an issue with the vehicle not appearing correctly in searches, which may affect visibility in the auction. After correcting their search method, they noted that the vehicle showed up for non-AMG versions but advised the seller to contact @BAT for resolution. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) welcomed the feedback and reiterated their commitment to resolving the issue, which exemplifies a proactive approach to potential issues raised by buyers.
Negative: @leesnap raised concerns about a potential rust bubble above the passenger front fender, which the seller promptly addressed, affirming there was no rust present. However, @bb18 inquired about possible oil leaks and the vehicle's history regarding service records, noting a lack of documentation for the initial ownership years. @oham1 expressed hesitations regarding the vehicle's condition, questioning the maintenance practices, and highlighted an inconsistency with the alignment of the vehicle's 'V8 Biturbo' lettering, while also mentioning visible scratches in the photos.
|
 |
Positive: @Neframos215 noted that selling a Sapphire with only 1,200 miles is impressive, highlighting its beauty. Another comment from @CSmith1142 praised the car’s stunning color combination, while @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 reiterated how the quality and driving experience of the Lucid is comparable to a Porsche, making it a distinctive choice among electric vehicles. @onelap shared a personal experience praising the Sapphire's versatility, comfort, and performance, emphasizing its status as an excellent daily driver. Overall, many comments reflect a strong admiration for the Sapphire, with users highlighting its beauty, performance, and technological advancements.
Neutral: Some discussions revolved around specific features of the Sapphire, like the inclusion of Dream Drive Pro and Surreal Sound Pro, which @c0mbe (The Seller) confirmed are included in the vehicle. Queries about the car's specifications were common, with @De3de8 asking about the curb weight, and @Vpippolito requesting the window sticker. Comments also included an inquiry about the car’s use on the track, showcasing interest from potential buyers regarding its performance capabilities. Additionally, there were some logistical discussions regarding parts availability and tips for installers during detailing work.
Negative: There were a few concerns regarding the Sapphire. @m3incorp expressed reluctance to purchase a car lacking the Dream Drive Pro, stating any potential purchase would require such features. @absent shared an anecdote about past complications with parts availability and voiced skepticism about warranty issues when modifying the car. Furthermore, @M3123 raised questions about the practicality of the Sapphire's range, particularly in heavy traffic conditions, indicating some skepticism about the viability for daily use. These negative comments hint at buyers' worries about practicality and support for new technology in high-end vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg complimented the vehicle by stating it is "Nice…VERY nice 500E," expressing good wishes. Additionally, @MK69 noted a "Quick turnaround on sale" and described it as a nice car. @JAY-Z referred to it as a "bahn-stormer" and praised its stealth compared to other vehicles like the M5. These comments communicate a strong appreciation for the car's aesthetics and performance. Furthermore, @Swhan discussed the car's collectibility, crediting its unique lineage and limited production with its enduring appeal and value retention.
Neutral: A mixture of inquiries about the vehicle's condition, service history, and performance were raised by several users. @JITPeter requested videos of the car's cold and warm starts, while @Baddogdesmo and @dtamscott sought specifics on maintenance, including documentation of the wiring harness replacement and details on service invoices. @sockpuppet emphasized the importance of maintenance records over low mileage, highlighting that the car looks promising based on early impressions. @sdawg1 (The Seller) shared some information about his ownership, stating he had performed a fluid change and that the car runs perfectly, but acknowledged the need for potential further verification from interested buyers.
Negative: Concerns were voiced regarding the lack of specific maintenance records and seller input. @nylonoxygen emphasized that without service information from the seller, the vehicle becomes a non-starter for potential buyers. @dtamscott pointed out the absence of a comprehensive maintenance summary, triggering a sense of caution among commenters who stressed the importance of thorough documentation in ensuring buyers are confident in the car's condition. @oldbeachbum raised a question about possible water spots on the trunk lid, suggesting other buyers might also express concerns about cosmetic issues, which could affect overall perceptions of the car's quality.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle, a rare Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco, is highly praised for its modifications and driving experience. @BuggerOff (The Seller) mentions the inclusion of features such as fuel injection, four-wheel disc brakes, and advanced steering, making it a pleasurable vehicle for everyday use. Commentators like @Todd_Z. and @JZWPhoto commend the restoration and the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, while @Kern911 appreciates the tasteful upgrades that enhance the driving experience. Additionally, the positive sentiments emphasize it as a solid and beautifully built classic vehicle that would attract many potential buyers.
Neutral: Many comments focus on the auction and its community aspects, highlighting the excitement around the bidding process. Commenters like @jscheier note the impressive collection of Stroppe Broncos available, while @Chapter2 discusses transportation logistics for potential buyers. The discussion also touches upon the trailer available for purchase, with users pondering practical options for transporting the vehicle. Overall, the comments maintain a neutral tone around auction details without showing strong opinions about the vehicle itself.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming positivity, there are a few lighthearted critiques regarding specific features of the Bronco. @aleeka humorously mentions an unexpected radio ad that momentarily detracted from their enjoyment of the vehicle. Additionally, @Andyp clarifies a mix-up about the vehicle's flooring material, suggesting that some may be unclear about specific details. However, these comments do not reflect a genuine dissatisfaction with the vehicle but rather serve to inject some humor into the discussion.
|
 |
Positive: @tjc86126 expressed a humorous admiration for the Toyota brand, suggesting that the vehicle, despite its age and history, is a worthwhile and blessed opportunity for potential buyers. Another comment indicated that if this Tacoma had a clean history, it could be valued as high as $22k, with @KZN185Surf highlighting the community's appreciation for the chance to potentially acquire the vehicle for under $8k.
Neutral: Several participants raised questions about the truck's history and functionality. @neil356-fan inquired about the process of registering it with multiple salvage rebuilt titles and its implications for insurance. @Idavidsheldon asked about the vehicle's features, such as cruise control and original taillight assemblies, while also questioning alignment issues and past repairs. The seller, @RNBuySell, responded to most queries, alleviating some concerns by confirming no significant alignment issues and detailing the wire behind the seats.
Negative: Comments also reflected skepticism regarding the truck's condition and value. @VioletPearl pointed out the truck's salvage title and previous owners, questioning its worth at $20k. @tjc86126 further conveyed curiosity about the vehicle's qualifications for auctioning, considering its severe damage and age, indicating doubts about whether it meets the community's standards for special vehicles. Concerns were raised about the potential need for a battery replacement from @KZN185Surf and overall concerns about the resale value given its history.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly emphasizing its impressive condition and low mileage. @cqhall mentioned wanting another E60 M5, highlighting the car's desirability. @Bbarondes noted the logical HVAC controls, while @Jonesy66 described the car as a 'white unicorn,' inspired by its V10 F1 roots. @ElVerde and @Flguy76 were impressed by its maintenance and cleanliness, indicating that it is too pristine for regular driving. @championeaster echoed this sentiment, celebrating how the vehicle appears nearly new, which many enthusiasts found thrilling.
Neutral: The seller, @Daldoctor, provided detailed information on recent services, including an extensive list of maintenance actions taken to preserve the vehicle's condition. He shared a wealth of knowledge about caring for the S85 engine and highlighted his experience with high-performance vehicles, describing how to ensure the longevity of the engine components. While other users like @RenegadeRoller acknowledged the thorough care reflected in the seller's comments, they also raised concerns about the idling practices mentioned by the seller, suggesting that immediately driving the vehicle might be preferable to letting it idle.
Negative: Despite the admiration for the vehicle, some commenters raised concerns about specific issues commonly associated with the BMW E60 M5. @hairtrigga noted a lack of inquiries about rod bearings and throttle actuators, which are often discussed in relation to the model. @Motor_Away criticized the seller's practice of letting the engine idle for warm-up, stating it could harm the engine. Additionally, @nexusautobrokers requested more mileage, hinting at a belief that the vehicle may be underutilized. Overall, while the vehicle was praised, there were caveats about its high-performance nature and the care required to maintain it.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments for its striking purple color, with @boaboyoz calling it a 'wicked Washington purple prince' and declaring it has a 'bodacious build.' Commenters, including @Gmmuscleusa, expressed appreciation for the color, signifying that it captures attention on the road. The seller, @Tnbusiness71, highlights that the vehicle's paint is of good quality and was repainted to reflect the personal aesthetic of a previous owner, adding that it’s a beautiful shade of purple that draws admiration, potentially linked to fan affiliations with teams like the Phoenix Suns and Minnesota Vikings.
Neutral: @x2p posed several practical questions regarding the vehicle's condition, including concerns about rust and paint quality. The seller responded, indicating that only surface oxidation is present and that the frame remains solid. They also noted that the vehicle underwent minor maintenance after acquisition, ensuring it is in good operating condition. Furthermore, the seller assured that the vehicle could be registered in Canada without duties, emphasizing their experience in handling international buyers and providing full support for shipping across different states and countries.
Negative: Some issues were highlighted about the vehicle, including a 'Service Air Suspension' message that appears temporarily on startup due to an upgrade of rear air suspension to springs, a common modification for these models. @x2p inquired about potential leaks or unresolved issues, to which the seller confirmed that the vehicle has no active mechanical problems, although the message could be coded out by a dealership if buyer desires. The lack of a spare tire is another concern addressed by @Tnbusiness71, who offered a tire sealant kit as a temporary solution, indicating a minor trade-off for buyers who may prefer having a spare tire.
|
 |
Positive: @mrpotty highlighted that the vehicle looks great after cleaning, suggesting a positive aesthetic appeal. Additionally, @4WHEEL_GERMAN, the seller, provided helpful videos, indicating transparency and a willingness to assist potential buyers further in their decision-making process.
Neutral: @Fargie and @JWhitNC raised concerns about the absence of a third-row seat as stated in the auction description, prompting clarification from the seller, @4WHEEL_GERMAN. They mentioned checking on this feature, demonstrating an effort to keep potential buyers informed. Concerns about the vehicle's maintenance, such as the timing belt and transmission fluid change, were also discussed, indicating that buyers are considering the vehicle's history before making a commitment.
Negative: Several comments cast doubt on the presence of the third-row seats, with @BENZach expressing skepticism based on observable details like visible seat belts. @washdup pointed out a discrepancy regarding the wheel names in the description, suggesting a lack of accuracy and attention to detail. Furthermore, @bradjh28 inquired about the last transmission fluid change, indicating concern about the vehicle's maintenance history, which remained unanswered by the seller.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described as having a bright and bold blue color, attracting attention, especially from those who appreciate unique specifications. The seller, @crossjeep34, emphasizes their experience with successful auctions and commitment to transparency, indicating that previous buyers have been satisfied with their purchases. They invite potential buyers to visit their showroom in Louisville, Kentucky, which adds to the credibility of their offer.
Neutral: Commenters express curiosity about the engine details and driving performance of the vehicle. @Showerfan questions whether the engine was rebuilt or swapped, while @tomelroy seeks clarification on the top speed of the vehicle. The seller responds with information about the engine and driving capabilities, sharing that the vehicle can cruise at 80 mph, and mentions plans for more videos.
Negative: Several commenters express concerns about the condition of the vehicle, particularly mentioning the need for driving videos due to its lack of use over the past decade. @WAGONBOYTD raises doubts about how well the engine runs and suggests it needs to be driven more regularly. Others agree that the added clarity from outside videos could help assure potential buyers, emphasizing that the unique nature of Land Rovers requires regular use to maintain performance and reliability.
|
 |
Positive: This vehicle received positive acknowledgments for its overall condition, with one comment describing it as a "clean looking Mini". The seller highlighted the installation of new tires in January 2026 and noted that the car has no curb rashes, indicating good maintenance. Several commenters expressed excitement over the car, mentioning their previous ownership of similar models and their interest in purchasing this one, highlighting a positive community sentiment around the vehicle.
Neutral: Comments about the car's features, such as whether it includes a Harman Kardon sound system, navigation, or park distance control, brought up a lot of discussion but no consensus. The seller clarified that these features were incorrectly advertised and ownership of the car confirmed this fact. There were questions regarding the accident reported on Carfax, and the seller asserted that there was no damage, although this discrepancy has caused mixed feelings among potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns raised about the accuracy of the vehicle's advertised features created skepticism among potential buyers. Some commenters and the seller acknowledged mistakes in the listing regarding features that the car does not possess, such as Harman Kardon speakers and various technology packages. Additionally, there were inquiries about a reported accident, leading to doubts about the vehicle's condition despite the seller's insistence that there was no actual damage.
|
 |
Positive: @belmo122 described the vehicle as a "BEAUTIFUL CAR!" while @boaboyoz praised it as a "fabulous" sight with its striking white exterior and red interior, calling it an exquisite example. @Dollycat3 commented on its stunning design and the updates it features, while @jonathanp441 expressed admiration for the interior, highlighting it as "wow." Additionally, @Hoppy18 enjoyed the combination of the car's power and aesthetics, referring to it as a "beast in a sheep's clothing."
Neutral: @Andrecox1, the seller, shared that they are reluctantly selling the car but have loved their time with it, calling it one of the easiest classic cars to drive. They also noted that interested buyers can contact them for a viewing, and they provided details about the car's recent tire replacements and features. Comments from users like @Bj123 and @3zebra36 included inquiries about air conditioning, the age of tires, and the possibility of a driving video.
Negative: On the more critical side, @3zebra36 raised concerns about the spare tire not fitting the knock-off wheels, seeking clarification from @Andrecox1 regarding the spare's compatibility. Furthermore, there were comments from @3zebra36 questioning the original mirrors, which @Andrecox1 acknowledged as not being ideal, admitting they are among the least favorable aspects of the vehicle's build. There was also a request from @ElegantMotors for clarification on the VIN number, indicating some concern over the car's documentation.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz praises the vehicle as a 'marvelous Mesa Crown Victoria', describing it as a delightful example and wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @Slam105 comments on the car's vibrant colors, stating that the '56 Crown Vic screams 'mid-century-modern', reminiscing fondly about wearing similar colors in junior high school. @Dollycat3 calls it 'fabulous, stylish and exceptional', highlighting its appeal and elegance. @Middler89 appreciates the design, noting that it is one of the few cars that can pull off the continental kit without looking out of place. @neverenoughgold shares a nostalgic story about their family's history with a similar model, expressing their hope that the car will fetch a good price in the market.
Neutral: @neverenoughgold provides a detailed personal history related to the vehicle, recalling family memories tied to a 1956 Fairlane Town Sedan, which was also a Ford product. This comment brings a sense of history and connection to the brand without explicitly evaluating the current vehicle's condition or pricing. Their story illustrates the nostalgia associated with classic cars and the sentimental value they hold for many families.
Negative: @sir_keith expresses a critical view on the continental kit add-on, arguing that such modifications were not seen on entry-level cars during the era and claiming that they detract from the iconic mid-century design of the vehicles. His disagreement suggests a belief that while the car may be admired, certain aesthetic choices could negatively influence its appeal among purists.
|
 |
Positive: @59caddyman (The Seller) showcases this stunning 1976 Chevrolet Cosworth Vega, highlighting its exceptional condition with only 14,000 original miles and a meticulous maintenance history. @Vtec4ever expresses admiration for the car's cleanliness and declares it an amazing vehicle from a builder of race engines. Enthusiasts like @GSX223 share their positive memories of owning similar models in the past, indicating a strong appreciation for this classic car. @mkekiddoc notes that the Cosworth Vega was ahead of its time, emphasizing its coolness and performance potential, and wishing luck for the auction.
Neutral: Commenters engage in discussions about the vehicle's history and specifications. @JAY-Z and @Valiantjim analyze its competition and performance metrics of the time, noting the low horsepower figures due to emission regulations. The conversation includes facts about its dealer history and the rarity of this specific model, with some comments pondering the notable absence of features like air conditioning, which @question00 addresses positively, sharing their own enjoyable experiences driving without AC. Others like @brennerf and @bradyzq explore technical aspects of the engine, displaying a range of knowledge about the vehicle.
Negative: Conversely, there are some concerns about the Cosworth Vega’s performance. @caozman reminisces about the limitations imposed by the EPA, which stifled the engine's potential. @krazytrkr shares a negative experience with their own Vega, mentioning it was stolen shortly after purchase, highlighting the unfortunate realities that can accompany classic car ownership. @Valiantjim also touches on the disappointment regarding the power output, suggesting that the model's historical context and manufacturing decisions led to its underwhelming reputation, including a discussion about the viability of tuning these engines.
|
 |
Positive: @sernow described the vehicle as a "gorgeous truck," indicating an appreciation for its appearance and appeal. The seller, @classic_autos123, engaged positively with the bidders, expressing gratitude for their interest and bids, which hints at a friendly and accommodating sales approach. The seller has been proactive in thanking bidders and wishing them luck, creating a supportive auction environment.
Neutral: @classic_autos123 provided detailed information about the vehicle's condition and service history, clarifying previous concerns regarding electrical issues. The seller mentioned replacing the alternator and battery, assuring bidders that the vehicle is functioning well now. The communication suggests the seller is being transparent and thorough in responding to inquiries, encouraging further questions from potential buyers.
Negative: @Novacaine72 raised concerns about potential electrical issues related to a dead battery, indicating some skepticism about the vehicle's reliability. Despite @classic_autos123's reassurances regarding the repairs and current state of the vehicle, the initial worry from @Novacaine72 reflects uncertainty that could affect potential bidders' confidence. Overall, while most comments were positive, the question raised about electrical problems suggests some lingering doubts.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm about the vehicle's features and condition. @SuperKram highlights the 2005 model's electric cooling fans, emphasizing their efficiency benefits with improved fuel economy. @Calamari_Jujutsu comments positively on the truck's overall presence, and @76GPrix appreciates the cleanliness of the GMC YukonXL Denali. @1globalleader also describes it as a great vehicle, suggesting a general consensus on its quality among commenters.
Neutral: There are several inquiries regarding specific functionalities and aspects of the vehicle. @zmendez asks about the operational status of the Z55 Autoride, while @Oakhurst seeks clarification on the all-wheel-drive capabilities. @BobandLinda inquires about the maximum towing capacity, and @Franky8 wants to know if the paint is original. These queries imply a keen interest in understanding the vehicle better rather than conveying strong opinions.
Negative: However, there are some concerns raised regarding the vehicle's history and condition. @CGREGORY22 questions why there are only two service records on the Carfax, which could indicate limited maintenance history. @dobbaker seeks clarity on whether the vehicle has Displacement on Demand (DOD) or Active Fuel Management (AFM), suggesting apprehension about the engine's features. Additionally, @drjgas notes a specific cosmetic issue with the headliner, pointing out a minor blemish that has been addressed.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as absolutely gorgeous, complimenting its wonderful condition and color, which reminds her of a beloved previous car. @traveler_1701 agrees, labeling it a beautiful car and hinting at its potential high value. @tdcarman acknowledges the sturdiness of these cars and appreciates the pleasing interior work. @Pontf (The Seller) shares his pride in the vehicle's restoration and mentions that it has received positive reception, including a first-place finish at a car show. @Rev.Wally praises the restoration quality, having seen the car before and afterwards, and expresses confidence in its reliability. @LouFifer reflects on the car's enjoyable traits and recalls fond memories of driving similar models.
Neutral: Several comments seek clarification on various features of the vehicle. @Pajohn asks if a noted vibration at high speeds has been resolved, while @alaskossie inquires about the location of the control switch for the overdrive and the source of the seat belts. @RCP raises safety concerns about the overdrive wiring and the potential need for adjustments to the gas pedal area. @Cab requests a video demonstrating cabin noise at driving speed, and @kettlemaker asks about the specifics of the vibration issue and the speedometer's functionality. @Pontf (The Seller) provides insights about the car's history and acknowledges current limitations in documentation.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, concerns about the vehicle's condition have been raised. @mpjord argues that the vehicle's rear end suggests it is actually a 1966 model, and @RCP details possible issues with the overdrive switch's wiring. @mPjord questions the model year based on design differences, and @vintage_volvo points out potential issues that could cause vibrations in 122s, hinting at a problem that may need to be addressed. @Pontf (The Seller) admits that a slight vibration exists and suggests it may be due to the drive shaft needing balance, which he feels is an important detail for prospective buyers to consider.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's restoration and noted the quality of the work that had been done. @timberframe commented on the nice restoration, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @southsideimports, the seller, talked about sourcing the truck from Colombia and highlighted the North American specifications it seems to embody, such as having a factory hard top and specific engine features. Several users noted the vehicle's unique modifications and historical context, which adds interest for potential buyers.
Neutral: The comments included questions about the vehicle's specifications, such as @mikec7120 inquiring about the steering tightness and whether the truck could be driven comfortably on a long trip. @cleareddirect asked if it had front disc brakes, to which the seller clarified that this model is equipped with drums which are in good working condition. Additionally, users discussed the vehicle's registration issue, with @dcducks1 questioning why it is registered as a 1980 model when the VIN indicates it is a 1978.
Negative: There were concerns expressed about the vehicle's electrical issues, specifically the non-functioning headlights and gauges. @berend15 raised questions about the electrical side, suggesting that some components might have been inadequately completed, which @southsideimports confirmed by explaining that the problems arose after the vehicle had been in storage. @theduke2 questioned why the year of the truck wasn't corrected upon registration, suggesting that it complicates the sale for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the 2015 Range Rover Autobiography highlight its luxury and excellent condition. @autodad emphasizes the vehicle's high-end features, including a supercharged 5.0L V8 engine that provides a smooth and powerful driving experience. There is also mention of its well-maintained interior, which still retains a 'new-car' smell, and the vehicle reportedly drives without any warning lights or unusual noises. Commentors appreciate the updates provided by @autodad regarding the vehicle's specs, modifications made to the listing, and video footage showcasing the truck's performance.
Neutral: Several questions have been raised about the vehicle's features and service history. @CChiusolo pointed out a discrepancy in the sound system's power output, which @autodad promptly addressed. Additionally, @TFKLAFI inquired about the towing hitch and dimensions, with @autodad providing clear and helpful responses, including additional photos of the factory-fitted tow bar. @Frogman189 expressed concern over the vehicle's documented maintenance history, prompting @autodad to share information from the Carfax report to clarify the service entries and assure potential buyers of the vehicle's condition and maintenance.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's service history and documentation have been voiced by various commentors. @Frogman189 specifically noted the lack of detailed maintenance records beyond a battery replacement, suggesting that a well-maintained vehicle should have clearer documentation. Furthermore, there are worries about the clarity of the video evidence provided, with requests for longer clips to assess the engine's performance. The mention of an open recall adds to these concerns, with @1hickoryhead asking for details about the seat and wheels, while @pilot747 wanted a closer view of the wheels for signs of curb damage.
|
 |
Positive: @OutOfMyElement shared a positive experience from renting a similar vehicle, noting impressive acceleration despite its size, and expressed excitement about its capabilities. @painless1960 humorously acknowledged the car's fuel efficiency estimate of 10 mpg over 22 years while expressing a strong desire to own the Ford Excursion, indicating its appeal to those who appreciate its unique qualities. Additionally, @Tnbusiness71 (The Seller) described the vehicle as a well-maintained example with low mileage due to its time spent in Japan, highlighting its excellent mechanical condition and rigorous maintenance standards that vehicles there must meet.
Neutral: @Tnbusiness71 provided detailed information about the vehicle, including its specifications and features like a 6.8-liter Triton V10 engine and aftermarket modifications. The seller also addressed comments about the vehicle's history, confirming its low mileage and the absence of a third-row seat, offering advice on how potential buyers could obtain replacements. Furthermore, there is clarity about additional photos being made available for interested bidders to assess the vehicle's condition more thoroughly, enlightening them on previous use.
Negative: @Brassking1 raised concerns about potential body rust, prompting @Tnbusiness71 to reassure that the vehicle is in good condition with no significant rust issues. @Izmirjoe questioned the availability of the missing third-row seats, while @liftinglarge mentioned the absence of a spare tire, leading to the seller offering a tire sealant kit instead. @ExecutiveMotorsports pointed out some wear on the steering wheel and asked about the radio compatibility, revealing a few areas where the vehicle could fall short of expectations for some potential buyers, especially in terms of its historical ownership and existing aftermarket modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @piezopaul presents his e91 sports wagon as a well-cared-for driver, emphasizing its reliability and performance through detailed service reports. @asumtneer praises the auction presentation, and @jchez7 confirms the quality of the vehicle and the seller, noting the car's mechanical strength and excellent value for the price. Additionally, @BMWE90Guy expresses enthusiasm for the car's potential and encourages upgrades to enhance its appeal further, showcasing a positive community engagement around the listing.
Neutral: Throughout the discussion, @piezopaul provides transparency regarding the vehicle's salvage title, explaining that it resulted from a minor accident in 2020, which he repaired despite high estimates. He shares a driving video link to showcase the car's functionality and responds to inquiries by highlighting the rear seats and door cards. The interaction supports a sense of due diligence and openness, reflecting both the seller's willingness to clarify the vehicle's condition and the buyers' interest in its features.
Negative: While the comments don't express outright negativity, there is an underlying concern about the car's salvage title. @BMWE90Guy hints at modifications that could elevate the vehicle's status, suggesting that enhancements like OEM sport seats or coilovers could turn the car into a more competitive option in the market. This may imply that potential buyers should consider the car's history and think about additional investments to maximize its value.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle for its impressive build quality and the choice of engine, particularly highlighting the reliability of the L33 5.3L LS engine swapped into the Land Rover Discovery II. @GBRBiLL noted the appropriateness of the 5.3L engine compared to larger alternatives, while @JakeTheSnake115 and @elihbrown expressed their compliments about the build's overall presentation and the seller's engagement in the auction process. The seller, @Jpreston123, echoed these positive sentiments, emphasizing the attention to detail in the build and the careful selection of components, stating that the truck combines aesthetic appeal with robust performance suitable for varied terrains.
Neutral: Comments included requests for additional information regarding engine specifications, servicing, and the vehicle's modifications. @SteuerFrei sought details on the engine's year and serviceability, while @SloopJohnB asked for pictures of specific interior features. @mikedank and others expressed interest in seeing more visuals, such as photos of the original paint or videos of driving footage, to better assess the current condition of the vehicle. Additionally, questions about the center diff lock were also discussed, where @mc36586 and @JoeWUT provided insightful commentary on the 2003 model's features and modifications.
Negative: Concerns were raised by a few commenters about certain aspects of the vehicle, particularly regarding its cosmetic condition and the implications of purchasing a wrapped vehicle without prior paint photos. @mikedank questioned the seller's transparency about the vehicle's imperfections, while @Hawkwight expressed concern about the loudness of the engine. There were also inquiries about the engine's power and its compatibility with the Land Rover's transmission, reflecting apprehension about potential overloading issues. Overall, the feedback suggested a mix of admiration for the build while also highlighting the importance of transparency in the auction process.
|
 |
Positive: Multiple comments highlight the vehicle's stunning appearance and unique features, particularly the Designo Magno Platinum Matte paint and the luxurious interior with Designo Armanac Brown Leather. Commentors like @Mattwmoseley and @MasterDebator express appreciation for the car's color combination and design specifications. Additionally, @Rockster80 offers a favorable review after inspecting the car in person, remarking on its excellent condition, interior quality, and impressive performance during a test drive. @maxs1 also praises the striking contrast of colors in the vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @tgperformance, actively engages with potential buyers, responding to inquiries regarding minor damage and maintenance records. They assure buyers that the car has no leaks or known issues with the ABC Suspension, following questions from @hamid-k50 and others. @WisdomFirst seeks additional information on the vehicle's imperfections, the presence of Bluetooth, tire conditions, and overall maintenance records, showing that buyers are thorough in their examination.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about vehicle maintenance and potential risks associated with the ABC rodeo test. @maxs1 warns that performing the test could potentially lead to issues not currently present, and @Rocketman63 questions its usefulness without a check of the car's ability to hold pressure. @PGT_FTW and @maxs1 further discuss the need for preventive maintenance, including ABC fluid flushing and identifying parts that may need immediate attention, reflecting a cautious attitude among some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the Aston Martin Vanquish S overwhelmingly highlight its striking aesthetic and remarkable performance. @EJrumble calls it "the best looking GT car of all time, bar none," while @MJ52 simply states that it is a "gorgeous automobile." @Wob (The Seller) emphasizes the car's beauty and its exceptional driving experience, describing the V12 noise and Aston comfort as unmatched. Several users like @mifydnu and @hiyabrad echo similar sentiments, expressing admiration for the car's looks and design. The rarity of the model, as pointed out by @sirmathrocks, adds further allure, as it was a limited production with only around 800 units made globally, making it a true collector's item.
Neutral: Comments from potential bidders and car enthusiasts reflect a keen interest in the detailed aspects of the auction process and the car's specifications. @FSAR expresses a desire to view the car in person, while @Spdrcrj inquires about Apple CarPlay, indicating a blend of excitement and practicality in ownership considerations. @Kalepsis shares their positive experience with their own Vanquish and notes some maintenance costs, reminding bidders of the practicalities of owning such a luxury vehicle. Additionally, @Greggp2 requests paint meter readings, suggesting that potential buyers are conscientious about the car's condition before bidding. These comments indicate an understandable desire for transparency and information in the bidding process.
Negative: Despite the overall positivity, there are hints of concern regarding the affordability of the car, as seen in @eshum's comment about being "priced out." There’s also a shadow of doubt regarding maintenance and repair costs as raised by @Kalepsis, but they ultimately appreciate the car's reliability compared to other brands. Furthermore, @mtish36 and @mtl777 show some apprehension about the car's condition by asking about paint protection film and any existing issues, indicating a need for reassurance about the vehicle's state before committing to a bid. This mix of excitement and caution reflects the complexities of navigating the auction landscape for such a high-value car.
|
 |
Positive: The 2018 Sprinter van on auction has been positively received due to its quality build by SYNC Vans, showcasing careful thought in design and usability. Commenters like @blackonblack911 have appreciated its versatility, noting that many vans often over-engineer features, whereas this one strikes a good balance. @dodger53 highlighted the stellar workmanship of SYNC Vans and noted the thorough overview provided by the seller, enhancing the van's appeal. The spacious interior and numerous features cater well to both work and leisure, indicating the van is well-loved and maintained, ready for further adventures.
Neutral: The comments reflect an informative discussion about the van’s features, potential limitations, and specifications. @Jfickes inquired about cooking capabilities inside the van, prompting the seller to clarify that outdoor cooking setups are encouraged. Concerns were also raised about the height of the vehicle and possible registration issues, with @Bettheover and @Mr_e seeking detailed technical specifications and updates on its current registration. Overall, the dialogue provides an ongoing balance of insights into the van's practical applications and user experiences.
Negative: Some negative commentary focuses on minor wear and unknown issues related to the vehicle's condition. @Mr_e pointed out possible cigarette burns on the driver’s seat, to which the seller confirmed there had been no smoking and provided context about the upholstery instead. Concerns about the van's wear and the lack of clear answers regarding weekend towing capacity and weight from various users suggest buyers are cautious about potential hidden pitfalls. @romeopapa expressed valid concerns about the total weight and towing capabilities based on the build-out, indicating a level of skepticism about achieving optimal performance.
|
 |
Positive: @ktm_rick expressed excitement over the vehicle, urging for a driving video to showcase its performance. @Gmmuscleusa complimented the graphics, noting that while they once seemed dated, they're making a comeback, which highlights the car's appeal. @clwarkentin shared fond memories of a similar vehicle from three decades ago, appreciating the nostalgic design and the return of classic features like red taillights, indicating a strong emotional connection to the vehicle's build and performance.
Neutral: @onehot23t4, the seller, clarified concerns raised about the clearance of the rear tires after a comment from @socal1200r, confirming that there is sufficient space between the tires and the vehicle body. They provided reassurance by mentioning a physical check and attached photos to verify the claim. Discussions also touched on practical details like shipping information and tire specifications, with @nick617 and @onehot23t4 communicating logistical aspects to keep potential buyers informed.
Negative: @morgannut expressed discontent over the absence of a step 'n tow rear bumper, indicating a specific feature that could detract from the overall value of the vehicle. Additionally, @ein460 criticized the listing photos, stating that the quality of the images did not accurately convey the appeal of the paint job, suggesting that better visuals are needed to enhance the vehicle's presentation in the market. This feedback points to areas where improvements could be made for better appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed great admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its incredible historical significance. @GBRBiLL described it as 'interesting,' while @newcarpro called it 'an amazing piece of history' and emphasized its status as the oldest Excelsior on BaT. @Petrolholic was amazed by its age, noting it to be 'One Hundred Fourteen years old !!' and remarked on its rarity within the BaT database, which highlighted its uniqueness. @Mordizzle celebrated the positive legacy of the brand with enthusiasm, showcasing a strong appreciation for this vintage motorcycle.
Neutral: Several comments acknowledged the interesting technical aspects and stories related to the Excelsior. @shooker mentioned his experience with a 1912 Excelsior and noted the subtle changes over the years, while @Xrider discussed the features of the bike, including the addition of a disc brake to improve performance. @denisj asked if this was the same bike that had sold on eBay, indicating curiosity about its history and ownership. @Dave310 remarked on the thrill of riding such an iconic bike across the country, capturing the adventurous spirit that surrounds this vehicle.
Negative: There were few negative comments, but some discussions led to humorous exchanges about the future. @DaveD jokingly questioned @Xrider's potential new username after selling the bike, pondering whether he would go by 'Ex-Xrider.' Additionally, @Xrider reflected on the thoughtless maneuver of having to rename himself after the sale, showcasing a playful yet light-hearted concern about identity attached to the vehicle. Overall, while these interactions were light in nature, they contrasted with the overwhelmingly positive enthusiasm for the motorcycle.
|
50k-Mile 2004 Porsche 911 40th Anniversary Edition 6-Speed
WP0AA299X4S620654
Lot 227448
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their enthusiasm for the Porsche 996 40th Anniversary Edition, praising its handling and performance, especially with the X51 Powerkit that provides a robust 345 horsepower. @G-Dub shared how much fun he has had driving one, while @jeffsnavely described it as an underrated and special car offering an exceptional driving experience. Commenters appreciated the unique features and upgraded performance of the AE40 compared to regular 996 models, considering it a wise investment due to its rarity, with only about 1500 units made.
Neutral: Some questions arose regarding specific features and conditions of the car. @Bobsgts requested photos of the seat controls to verify lumbar support, while @Bonanzajock inquired about the clutch replacement history. @paddict8 raised concerns about the functionality of the car's components and the flashing speedometer in a video. The seller, @dreamcarp, addressed these questions by clarifying the car's features and confirming that the car runs excellently after recent services, including replacements of the mass air flow sensor and ignition components.
Negative: Several negative comments focused on missing features and concerns about the car's maintenance history. @45series and @Bonanzajock highlighted the lack of information on IMS bearing and clutch replacement, which led to some worries regarding the car's overall health. Additionally, @SDplinker questioned the missing lumbar support on the seats, while @TulumDreams expressed skepticism about the seller’s motivations for selling the car just two years after purchase. These concerns indicate apprehensions about the car's upkeep and the seller's transparency.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed high admiration for the vehicle, with enthusiasm about its capabilities and condition. @TheCrimsonCrawdad conveyed a desire to own the rig, appreciating its impressive design, while @Rudy333 mentioned that the vehicle puts newer models to shame due to its durability. @Miles77 and @OffgridCPA emphasized the vehicle's exceptional condition, labeling it as the best Land Cruiser they've seen, with high potential for longevity based on its clean engine bay and strong running condition.
Neutral: Several comments focused on technicalities and practical concerns related to the vehicle's emissions and registration in California. @theothernotoriousbdc sought clarification regarding the vehicle's CA emission status and discussed the legal requirements for smog compliance. @MJB194 and @Fireselector (The Seller) shared insights on the complexities of getting the vehicle registered and compliant, noting the costs associated with modification and testing necessary for completing the process.
Negative: There were limited negative comments, mostly expressing skepticism about the vehicle's pricing or features. @henchman26 hinted at the inevitability of debates regarding the vehicle's value and compliance issues, while @JayMo1 pointed out the challenges of adapting to a right-hand drive model. Overall, the conversation remained predominantly positive, with questions aimed more at understanding the vehicle rather than expressing outright negativity.
|
 |
Positive: @watergate528 describes the bike as "sharp," while @vmontijo expresses admiration for its beauty and acknowledges its critical details, noting his own interest in the auction. @Dvqredc5 praises the bike for being true to its original factory condition, evoking fond memories of racing from childhood, and commends the seller for providing a riding video, which captures the unique sounds and exhilaration of the two-stroke engine. @2011ZR1 and @Lazoren1 also compliment the aesthetics and performance of the bike, highlighting its nostalgic appeal and effective demonstration in the video.
Neutral: @Monsoon (The Seller) addresses potential bidders, assuring flexibility regarding pick-up and shipping options, and shares details about the bike's rare history and components. @BOD3 and @baltzerc raise questions regarding the engine and transmission replacements, seeking clarification about the restoration aspects and whether original parts are available. Overall, discussions revolve around the bike's specifications, rarity, and collectible nature, suggesting a knowledgeable audience engaged in the bidding process.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about the reliability of modifications or repairs made to the bike, such as @BOD3's inquiry about the transmission and @baltzerc's questioning regarding parts replacement and restoration history. @JGraham shares a personal sentiment, indicating that the bike is so well-preserved that it seems too nice to ride, which could imply a potential hesitation for buyers intending to use it as a practical vehicle. These cautionary notes highlight a level of skepticism about the bike's authenticity and functionality amidst the positive remarks.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 comments that this is a wonderful opportunity to get into vintage SLs, and @lfishman praises the imaginative nature of the seller for choosing a unique two-tone look for the interior. @SteveRyan (The Seller) shares that the vehicle runs great and shifts smoothly, emphasizing that it's an enjoyable driver as is, or for future improvements, which sounds promising to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several users, including @Capitanron and @roosterabbydog, recommend that the seller provide more detailed photos of the undercarriage and engine for transparency. @procrastibader inquires about potential modifications like the speakers in the rear seat, while @Justmehere asks about the condition of the throttle linkage, indicating an interest in the car's functionality and any potential issues. @JeffreyFl requests service documents to better understand the vehicle's history, showcasing a concern for its maintenance.
Negative: @lfishman notes that the vehicle could be more visually appealing if better prepared for sale, hinting at unaddressed issues that could have been easily improved. @Capitanron stresses the need for the seller to get the car professionally detailed, emphasizing that current photos may not represent the vehicle well. @procrastibader raises concerns about the dash and gauges, suggesting possible neglect in the car's upkeep, while others worry that the current state might lead to the car being passed over by potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @mr_smee praises the impressive build and mentions the amazing rear suspension setup while also appreciating the Dakota Digital components. @Dells simply expresses excitement with "SERIOUSLY BAD ASS!!!!" which highlights the overall admiration for the vehicle. @boaboyoz calls the El Camino very cool and an awesome build, showing enthusiasm for its design and execution. @Troydog commends the planning and execution of the modifications, noting that there are many upgrades that aren’t even listed, which adds to the car's appeal.
Neutral: @ssterry finds the vehicle interesting and notes the rarity of El Caminos set up for autocross, hinting at a mixed curiosity about its capabilities. @Crazytrain recalls his experience with a similar model in the past, indicating a nostalgic connection without a strong opinion on this specific vehicle. The comment from @NameTaken2 seems ambivalent, as the user humorously mentions initial disappointment before changing their tone to positive with a 'Nice' and 'GLWTA' (Good Luck With The Auction).
Negative: @hotrodwest points out a potential downside, noting the lack of A/C and the absence of a compressor, which could be seen as a drawback for buyers looking for comfort features. @WIZZZZ questions whether the short block was rebuilt before installation, which could indicate concerns regarding the engine’s reliability. @Jojojojo inquires about the presence of a fan and heater, suggesting uncertainty about whether the vehicle is equipped with basic necessities.
|
 |
Positive: @FirehouseVintage provides a warm welcome to bidders, highlighting the excellent specification of the 996 Carrera with features like heated seats while keeping performance in mind. The black paint, although it has had minor touch-up work, shows well and the overall condition of the interior is impressive with seats, dash, trim, and switch gear all in excellent shape. The vehicle also benefits from new Continental tires and delivers on driving performance with a smooth power delivery from the 3.4L engine and confident gear shifts from the 6-speed manual transmission.
Neutral: Various commenters have expressed curiosity about the vehicle's conditions, including inquiries about the reupholstering of the front seats and information on the IMS bearing status. @Crestwood996 and @szabi asked for details regarding production labels and engine mounts, while @repmekevets questioned the omission of IMS in early descriptions. @hchu17 suggested using a borescope for a more thorough assessment and requested a video demonstrating a cold start to hear the engine's sound.
Negative: A few concerns were raised about the car; specifically, @repmekevets emphasized the need for sellers to address the IMS issue upfront, noting it is a common question. @DThiry88 sought clarification on the ding on the left fender and requested details about the aging of the tires, further questioning the status of the IMS bearing. The overall sentiment reflects a cautious approach from potential buyers, highlighting the need for transparency in addressing common concerns regarding the 996 model.
|
 |
Positive: @Mercuryman remarked that the truck appears to be very nice and expressed nostalgia for his previous Silverado from the same Fort Wayne plant, foreseeing a bright future for this vehicle. @Superhawk65 shared excitement and gratitude for discovering this truck after an extensive search, appreciating its well-maintained condition and the fact that it has been kept in the same family since new. He highlighted that the original owner customized the interior from cloth to leather, adding to its unique appeal, and welcomes inquiries about the truck from potential buyers.
Neutral: @weim55 noted the interesting pricing of the stepside bed, pointing out that historically, stepsides were considered more budget-friendly models. @5.0THIS asked about the use of the auto 4WD mode on dry pavement, prompting @Superhawk65 to clarify that he only uses 4WD under snowy or icy conditions. There were additional comments discussing the truck's history and features, with @KWAChevyGuy providing technical advice about the 4WD settings based on a video shared by @Superhawk65.
Negative: There were minimal negative comments regarding the truck, though some opinions suggest that the stepside version should be a lower-cost model due to its historical context. @davemx5 questioned the details of the seating surface, unsure if it was leather or vinyl, reflecting a slight concern over the interior specifications. However, overall feedback on the truck remained overwhelmingly positive, highlighting its excellent condition and rarity.
|
 |
Positive: @RidingHigh complimented the vehicle as nicely done, while @pandawest urged someone to buy it and enjoy the driving experience it offers. @boaboyoz referred to the car as 'sublime' and 'divine,' and @JAY-Z praised the quality of the photography, claiming the Oak Green color is phenomenal and even worthy of display at a museum. Additionally, @MattsMistakes46 remarked on the stunning color and drew attention to the wing's impressive look, showcasing an overall strong admiration for the car's aesthetics and potential ownership enjoyment.
Neutral: Comments indicate mixed feelings about the auction dynamics. @Mark635CSieuro suggested that perhaps there isn't a substitute for this vehicle, hinting at its uniqueness. @Caymanorcarrera pointed out the rising prices, observing that a regular GT3 is now reaching $300K. @gb75 and @RedArcadia questioned the efficacy of bidding below certain amounts, while @Vtec4ever countered with the belief that you cannot lose money on new GT3s, reflecting a common sentiment among some bidders about the car's value retention.
Negative: Concerns arose regarding the seller's intentions, with @Deltablue questioning why someone would personalize a car if intending to flip it. @Scuderia1 speculated on whether the dealer had to purchase multiple other models to gain allocation for this vehicle. @Scullyd noted potential confusion about its title status, suggesting complexities in the sale process. Furthermore, @kailua808 expressed frustration with the likelihood of needing to bid significantly above the reserve, emphasizing a sense of disappointment towards the current market dynamics.
|
 |
Positive: @2002WS6 appreciates the superior build quality of the car, noting it has less plastic under the hood compared to their 2011 BMW 328Xi and considers it a very nice car overall. @High_Hope expresses love for their 2003 330Ci, highlighting its comfort and handling while acknowledging a nostalgic longing for their previous E36 M3. @Fredoinsf complements the vehicle's color combination and shares a personal experience of refinishing similar interior trim, indicating pride in ownership and maintenance capability.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics, the seller, welcomes potential buyers to the auction for the 2002 BMW 330Ci Convertible. They emphasize their focus on unique and desirable vehicles from private sellers and detail their commitment to transparent transactions, alongside their strong customer review rating. Buyers inquired about logistics and inspection options, which the seller readily provides information about, indicating accessibility and transparency concerning the sale.
Negative: @SaabFan points out that the lack of heated seats in a convertible is a significant oversight, especially for maximizing enjoyment during colder weather. @Samut448 raises a concern regarding the car's ownership history, questioning the reason for so many owners despite its low mileage. @woodsidefarm notes an issue with discoloration on the passenger side ragtop, highlighting potential cosmetic concerns that could affect the vehicle's appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its charming appearance and unique features. @Crovet noted the vehicle's low mileage and air conditioning, describing it as a nice option. @boaboyoz described the teal color as 'unreal' and praised it as an adorable build, adding good wishes for the auction. @Bob_Jackson also remarked positively on the match between the vehicle's color and wheel color, reflecting on how desirable yet unnecessary such vehicles can be, showing the appeal of the Acty among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments were more inquisitive or focused on technical details about the vehicle. @bhoffma1 asked about the weight difference between the 2WD and 4WD versions, while @12cilindriFF expressed confusion about the 4-speed transmission, expecting a 5-speed instead. @Timber499 raised a query about carb compliance, acknowledging that it might be a concern for those in California. These comments indicate an interest in understanding the vehicle's specifications better, implying a consideration of practical use in addition to its fun characteristics.
Negative: On the negative side, @12cilindriFF's confusion about the transmission and @Timber499's concerns about smog compliance reflect potential pitfalls for potential buyers. @ydemedonsa added that compliance issues might require out-of-state processes, which could deter some bidders. The mention of needing to consult a referee for qualifications indicates that not all comments were purely positive, hinting at the challenges that can accompany owning such a unique vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @goliath414 notes that the 4.88 gearing paired with 35s on the YJ makes for excellent off-road crawling and on-road acceleration, acknowledging potential highway challenges but emphasizing that these vehicles are designed for rugged use. @Mhembree appreciates the tasteful modifications, even as a fan of more stock versions of YJs. @joeveto shares a positive experience from owning a similar lifted Jeep, recalling comfortable highway travels without issues despite its off-road focus. @Yeckim75 (The Seller) proudly states the Jeep excels off-road and performs surprisingly well on-road, managing steep grades effortlessly and maintaining good speed over flat terrain. The seller is also eager to provide detailed information and clarifications to potential buyers.
Neutral: @Yeckim75 (The Seller) mentions that while the heater operates effectively, the fan only works on the high setting, indicating a minor issue that might be considered in negotiations. The seller provides details about the Jeep’s modifications and capabilities, like the D300 flip kit from DEO and Advance Adapters Atlas shifters, as well as a rear disc brake kit, showing transparency about the vehicle's features. @CurtisTyota discusses the importance of low gearing and crawl ratios while appreciating the construction choices made over superficial additions like light bars, highlighting a focus on functionality that purportedly surpasses that of newer models.
Negative: @CurtisTyota raises a concern about the hardtop's appearance, suggesting the spray paint might look splotchy due to lighting or actual condition. @Leonardo555 inquires about shipping options to Italy, introducing a logistical concern that may complicate the sale. @Yeckim75 (The Seller) has to clarify that arrangements for international shipping would need to be made by the buyer. Additionally, the seller acknowledges the need to clean the hardtop to better address visibility issues raised by potential buyers, indicating a need for further presentation efforts.
|
 |
Positive: The 2012 Range Rover has garnered positive attention for its classic features and low mileage, as highlighted by @littlehandegan, who is representing a passionate seller. Many commenters appreciate the vehicle's specifications, with @zuno expressing regret for recently purchasing a similar model just before this one appeared, emphasizing how rare the described configuration is. @FXRcR1, who knows the owner personally, praises the seller's meticulous care for their vehicles, underscoring the outstanding condition of this Range Rover, along with their own positive experience with the same model.
Neutral: Several commenters like @mlowengrub acknowledge the reputation of @littlehandegan and the vehicle's appeal while also noting the auction still has several days remaining, allowing potential buyers time to consider their options. @6mt_life asked specific questions regarding the functionality of features and any potential mechanical issues observed during the videos shared by @littlehandegan, showing curiosity about the car’s condition while maintaining an open perspective on the auction process. @Volvodr provides an informed appraisal of the vehicle, having serviced it, but does not express strong opinions on the bidding situation.
Negative: Concerns were raised about some mechanical aspects of the vehicle, as noted by @6mt_life regarding the telescoping steering wheel and possible rust on the rear arches. Despite these queries, @littlehandegan assured that the heated and ventilated seats are functioning correctly and confirmed that there was no significant rust, indicating a commitment to transparency during the sale. The slight dent on the exhaust pipe mentioned by @6mt_life could also be seen as a minor drawback, but @littlehandegan reassured that it wouldn't affect the car's performance, indicating that while some issues exist, they may not be dealbreakers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the beauty and uniqueness of the vehicle, with @DsizzleTX noting its clean example and suggesting it has desirable upgrades. @nhgreg praises the exceptional driving experience the Elise offers, saying it provides an unparalleled connection to the wheels that is hard to find in modern cars. Similarly, @Collectibleclassics believes the car is easily worth over $50k due to its enjoyable driving experience and reliability. Other commenters, such as @Tcondenz, express excitement about the car's modifications and congratulate the seller on presenting a beautiful vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters provided useful insights about specific features of the model, notably from @ThatguyLFS, who identified the aftermarket wheels as Ethos wheels. @pjames (The Seller) confirmed the particularities of the car's cup holder and other accessories, including explaining the utility of the 'Elemental Shower Cap' cockpit cover. @a1harix asked about various items shown in the photos, encouraging further clarification from the seller about the car’s accessories and tool kit, which @pjames also addressed.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism about the car's price point, with @nhgreg mentioning that the asking price of $40k may escalate quickly and that these cars may not appeal to everyone. While most comments are positive, @cjmarka expressed regret over selling a similar vehicle, describing it as one of the dumbest decisions made during the pandemic. This sentiment underscores a feeling among some commenters that parting with a Lotus Elise might be a mistake due to their unique driving experience.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and conversion quality. @LLynn noted the beauty of the car and the effort the owner has put into it, mentioning the interior's magnificence. @MNberg also praised the color combination, describing the E-Type as stunning. @Descanuck and @gleasj1 echoed similar sentiments, appreciating the conversion and overall styling, while @Zazagalore shared excitement over the vehicle, indicating a genuine interest from potential buyers.
Neutral: Some comments showed interest in the vehicle's conversion history and maintenance details. @fka_ray recalled that roadster conversions were common decades ago and noted the shift in value perception over time. @Kinglaw pointed out that the conversion occurred before the current ownership, providing essential context. @CompassRacing (The Seller) responded to various inquiries about the car's history and condition, indicating ongoing communication with interested buyers. @NiallsShortbear and @Knuckles-R-Busted engaged in discussions about the vehicle's structural integrity, notably the load-bearing aspects of the chassis.
Negative: Several commenters raised concerns regarding the practicality and cost-effectiveness of the conversion. @Sparrownaut questioned if converting a hardtop to a roadster would be more expensive than purchasing an actual roadster. @fkameron highlighted potential issues, referencing an engine rebuild and oil leaks, which could impact the vehicle's sale price. @wlp624 expressed apprehension about the low mileage since the restoration, questioning the assessment of the car's roadworthiness. These comments reflect uncertainties prospective buyers might have regarding the value and condition of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received high praise from multiple commentors for its stunning aesthetics and driving experience. @stevieboy1 states that it is the best looking two-door coupe MB made, especially highlighting its color as rare and beautiful. @packardv8 expresses agreement, emphasizing the car’s ageless style and wonderful grand touring ride. @sbr21212 appreciates the quality of the photos and states that they would frame them if they owned the car, while @virafp shares a positive experience with the seller, describing their shop and photo studio as amazing.
Neutral: Several comments highlighted inquiries regarding specific details of the car's condition, such as @WJK who asked about mileage and potential leaks. @goranscuric wanted to confirm whether the AC was operational, and @Mdhportor inquired whether the underside had received maintenance attention. The seller, @Wob, provided answers to these queries, confirming several aspects like the AC functionality and the general condition of components such as tires and seals, while also addressing the history of the vehicle without indicating any concerns.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @stevieboy1 regarding the vehicle's history, specifically questioning whether it had been in a rear-end accident due to a missing VIN tag behind the license plate. @Wob responded firmly, denying any history of accidents and defending the car's integrity. Tensions arose with further back-and-forth discussions about the VIN tag details, with @Bordeaux suggesting that such debates do not influence buying decisions, highlighting the irritable nature of some comments around the vehicle's history. Others, like @sbr21212, seemed skeptical about the accuracy of certain claims made during the discussion.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its engine and performance capabilities. @juniorr91 emphasizes that the engine alone is worth the price of admission, while @2012c63amg describes the vehicle as a 'hooligan German muscle car' and praises its reliability and impressive steering. @Wob (The Seller) also adds that the vehicle is a 'drift machine with 4 doors' and loves its exhaust note, describing it as a 'ROAR' that is sure to entertain its future owner, creating a fun atmosphere for the auction experience.
Neutral: Several comments touch on the specifics of the vehicle, indicating a desire for more detailed information. @zwillis questions the missing original 507 wheels and asks for clarification about the build composition, while @Gartinian inquires about service records and the presence of only one key. This indicates potential buyers' interest in understanding the vehicle's history and condition better. Additionally, commenters have requested details about included features, such as the halogen headlights and tire options, reflecting curiosity regarding the vehicle's specifications and modifications.
Negative: Some commenters have raised concerns regarding certain aspects of the vehicle. @DangerDong criticizes the halogen headlights, calling them 'diabolical,' while @ipittydafoo warns about potential issues with the engine if it hasn't been driven aggressively enough. @cloverfield points out the absence of a lighting package, attributing it to a xenon shortage, and expresses surprise at the addition of halogen lights. Furthermore, there are inquiries about the condition of the headliner and whether the exhaust modifications are positioned according to OEM specifications, which might indicate buyer apprehension regarding the car's integrity.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments expressed enthusiasm and admiration for the 2016 Porsche 911 GT3 RS, with @NOTAFANOFTHEMINIVAN stating that these cars are "so raw and so rewarding" and consider it one of the best Porsches produced. @Mandinga highlighted the vehicle's impressive build with low miles and top features, complimenting the seller on a well-presented listing. @JHBBII also added positivity, remarking on the beauty of the car and showing interest in its options, indicating a strong appreciation for the vehicle's specifications.
Neutral: The seller, @JROCS1, provided clarifications regarding the car's history, mentioning that they purchased it in 2016 from the third owner (their brother) and confirming that the car has never been on the track. The seller also noted the roll cage brand as BBI and responded to questions about the car's condition and original components available for potential buyers. Additionally, they mentioned not having the original window sticker but offering some online documentation instead.
Negative: Some inquiries raised concerns about the car's lack of warranties, with @ckimjin specifically asking about this issue, to which @JROCS1 confirmed there are none. Furthermore, there were a couple of comments expressing disappointment or frustration over wanting to own the car, as evidenced by @AlmostThere99's frustrated comment directed at @haldee. The absence of a lift for a more thorough inspection of the vehicle's underside also drew some mild concern among prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @tim54575 (The Seller) received overwhelmingly positive remarks about the Bentley Woudenberg family saloon, being labeled a lovely car with great potential. @Aaron expressed admiration, mentioning that if he didn't already own a British pre-war car, he would consider this one. @billyblyth noted that the vehicle is a nice rolling project, while @austin_alfa appreciated its character as a non-show car that could be driven without the owner worrying about small dings. Others, like @choirsilva, confirmed its usability and driving capability, suggesting it can keep up with traffic comfortably. Overall, commentators praised its historic charm and the joy it could bring to future owners.
Neutral: Several neutral statements were made regarding the car's mechanical aspects and suitability for restoration. @howie12 inquired about the availability of a replacement headlight lens, while @milburndrysdale1 asked about the functionality of the sunroof. @OnceUponATime recommended joining a Bentley Drivers Club for parts assistance, reflecting the community's willingness to help owners find necessary parts. @FrozenNorthCMB and @Jags_in_the_barn brought up the condition of the wheels, expressing curiosity about their specifics. This mixture of questions and observations illustrates a balanced view, highlighting both the car's appeal and the legitimate inquiries potential buyers may have.
Negative: On the downside, some comments hinted at practical concerns regarding the car's condition and fit for broader interest, particularly from serious collectors. @Frank_Barrett noted that it is not a show car and may not attract deep-pocketed buyers, while @brakeservo raised concerns about the driving comfort for someone of typical height, implying that the ergonomics might not suit everyone. @mtcarnt pointed out potential structural issues suggested by fiberglass patchwork, leading to doubts about past damage. These comments reflect an awareness of the vehicle's imperfections and limitations, which may influence the decision-making of prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Gmmuscleusa describes the vehicle as a "very nice example" noting its rare Buckskin interior, which seems to be appreciated. @CarDogThreePedals comments with a playful touch, reminding viewers to enjoy the ride. Users like @Gta90 express their enthusiasm for this car, searching out its auction history, which adds a layer of respect for the vehicle's background. Some commenters appreciate the idea of having a car without many options, leading to less potential issues, as noted by @South_paw. Overall, there is a general admiration for the aesthetics and nostalgia surrounding this classic vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments focus on questions regarding documentation and vehicle history. @geebponchobidder inquires about the availability of PHS documents and the build sheet, which are essential for classic car verification. @Tommy88turbo engages in discussions about whether the A/C components exist, showing interest in how the vehicle has been maintained. @S.Bell (The Seller) acknowledges the requests for documentation and promises to provide photos and further information, demonstrating a willingness to engage with potential buyers. Users also discuss the history of Carfax reports and their limitations for older models.
Negative: Several commenters express concerns about the lack of detailed documentation, which is important for potential buyers interested in the car's authenticity. @honda1 points out what he considers to be a lack of features on this vehicle, labeling it as the "least optioned '77 SE" he has seen. @944Armadillo and @PontiacFan61 raise doubts regarding specifications and engine discrepancies. Others mention the absence of crucial documents such as the window sticker and build sheet, which some believe could impact the car's value and desirability. Additionally, @80bluez28fan critiques others for not paying attention to the absence of A/C components, highlighting frustrations over repetitive inquiries that seem unnecessary given the information available.
|
 |
Positive: @Gearguy71 describes the vehicle as a purpose-built patina rust-free squarebody that incorporates vintage features like a bed topper, plaid headliner, and highly reliable Blueprint 400ci engine. The truck has only 350 to 400 miles on the engine and runs great, attracting attention wherever it goes, especially at traffic lights. The seller mentions that the vehicle runs cool, even in warm weather, and provides details on the truck's stance, which is enhanced by specific suspension modifications, creating a nice look without being too low. Other commentors like @BSer and @svatem have chimed in positively, expressing their enthusiasm and admiration for the truck's aesthetic and design.
Neutral: @Gearguy71 provides practical information about the truck’s features, such as the rear sliding window that improves airflow and the engine's details, pointing out the engine's specifications and the lack of rust on the vehicle. There are also discussions about the tank capacities and whether both fuel tanks are operational, with the seller confirming that they drained the passenger tank. The comment section includes inquiries about minor issues such as the slow power window and if any modifications have been made to the exhaust system, which the seller answers clarifying that the exhaust has been adjusted for aesthetic purposes.
Negative: @dhonthehill humorously points out the need to check for a bad spark plug, possibly suggesting that there might be minor mechanical issues present in the vehicle. @Ncampos21 raises a concern about smog regulations for California, indicating potential legal issues the truck might face in the state. @Cdcx4 expresses curiosity about whether both fuel gauges work, hinting at reliability concerns, while @jad81 queries about the state of the body paint, which could imply issues with wear and tear. These comments suggest some apprehension about the vehicle's maintenance and functionality despite the overall positive reception.
|
 |
Positive: @BVS3 (The Seller) emphasizes the vehicle's solid condition, asserting that there is no rust repair visible and that the floors and rockers appear original without any body filler. Commenters like @hr47cars find the car sharp-looking and commend the bold 'no reserve' auction strategy, suggesting it could attract a diverse range of bidders. Others like @Nate express excitement about the car's beauty and its above-average shape for an unrestored vehicle, highlighting its appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters admire the car's unique design, such as @Frank_Barrett who appreciates the paint colors that stand out compared to other vehicles of its era. @Middler89 mentions the appealing two-tone green color and notes the condition of the interior, while @Ypss36 reflects on the status and pride associated with owning a Buick during that time. The car's roadworthiness is also discussed, with @BVS3 (The Seller) confirming it has been driven around town.
Negative: However, there are some concerns raised among users. @Evenstar_Imports questions the condition of the trunk floor and mentions corrosion pinholes in the frame, prompting a reply from @Raidersnbeer, who believes there are no issues with rot on the car. @BVS3 (The Seller) addresses these concerns by stating that the trunk floor and frame are in good condition, dismissing the observations made by @Evenstar_Imports.
|
 |
Positive: @RJS1725 expresses that the car is awesome, emphasizing that anyone would love it despite personal constraints on bidding. @jimmytheirishman, @Gregc123, and @sir_keith all praise its beauty, with the latter noting the importance of originality. Numerous comments, particularly from @moodymanitobamorgan, highlight the car's impressive documentation and the honest patina it carries, suggesting it is a dream for collectors of survivor models. @Bears85 and @JohnF1966 emphasize the expertise of the care takers, Mickeys, reinforcing that the next owner will appreciate the car's condition. @Tbyjr shares admiration for the car's beauty and expresses a desire for it to fetch a high price at auction, reflecting a broader appreciation among commenters.
Neutral: Several comments focus on additional details related to the car's specifications and condition. @22truckie queries the presence of red overspray on the frame and comments on the car's awards, prompting replies from @mickeyscarbarn about the car's original paint and documentation. @3blackcars and @moodymanitobamorgan engage in a discussion about the horsepower ratings of the vehicle, reflecting a shared interest in the accuracy of vehicle specifications. This technical discussion illustrates a mix of enthusiasm and research, with others like @67Corvetteguy reminiscing about seeing the car at a judging event, describing it as a benchmark vehicle.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, some comments express disappointment regarding the lack of interest in the auction compared to restored models. @22truckie and @Tbyjr are astonished that such a significant survivor is not garnering more bids, pointing out the trend toward restorations over preservation. @22truckie lamented that many in the community fail to appreciate original cars, equating the scarcity of untouched models to the trend of modifying and restoring vehicles. @moodymanitobamorgan omits that the survivor movement seems to be wavering, indicating a struggle within the collector community to value authenticity over restored aesthetics.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong positivity towards the 2015 BMW M4, particularly highlighting its stunning interior and the seller's enthusiastic engagement. @MJHE30 appreciates the interior's aesthetic, while @lamorak_ admires the driving video, noting its quality with a lighthearted remark about the blurred speedometer. The seller, @Cantech, confirms that the car has never been tracked and describes it as a fun daily driver, emphasizing its maintenance history and lack of exposure to harsh weather, appealing to potential buyers.
Neutral: Various commenters express interest in getting more details about the car. @Ardi-import observes a discrepancy in the number of watchers compared to active bidders, indicating curiosity about the vehicle's market traction. @lamorak_ requests additional media materials, such as videos of the car, and @Cantech responds promptly by planning to release more videos, demonstrating good customer engagement and responsiveness from the seller.
Negative: While the overall sentiment is positive, there's a hint of concern from @Ardi-import about the low number of bidders relative to watchers. Furthermore, @MJHE30 raises a question regarding the car's history with potential wear from being tracked, indicating some apprehensions despite the seller's reassurance of its condition. @MkushiMike's comment about the heavy snowfall suggests a potential issue with driving conditions that could affect local interest in the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle for its stunning appearance, particularly highlighting the beautiful Silver Pearl color and stylish silver interior. @GBRBiLL remarked on the car's attractive look, while @kinglaw described it as a 'great monochromatic look.' @moosehead called it 'spectacular,' and @boaboyoz referred to it as a 'vision of ethereal beauty.' The seller, @corvetteswanted, emphasized the meticulous restoration process, detailing its factory original options and accolades, including the NCRS Top Flight Award. Many expressed excitement about the car's impressive features and the quality of its restoration.
Neutral comments focused on technical details and specifications rather than emotional responses. @mhspielman noted engine stamp specifics, while others discussed the car's options and the restoration process, relating to general Corvette knowledge. @TedLitvin complimented its impressive features but noted the absence of a hardtop. @BayViewSpeedShop brought up a minor point regarding the absence of an air cleaner decal in 1966 L79 models, indicating a desire for accuracy. This suggests an ongoing interest in preserving the car's authenticity alongside its stunning presentation.
Conversely, some negative comments raised questions about potential details concerning the vehicle's restoration and authenticity. @Lurvey inquired about the condition of the factory bonding strips, and @masatsune expressed concerns over possible visible defects post-restoration, asking for reassurance regarding the paint and structural integrity. @FootDoc was curious about the car's engine rebuild specifics, highlighting concerns over details often overlooked in such restorations. Additionally, @a-snake pointed out discrepancies in the power window conduit, indicating that some elements might not adhere to original specifications. Overall, while the vehicle garnered enthusiasm, these comments underline a cautious scrutiny typical among classic car enthusiasts.
Neutral:
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is praised for its color combination, specifically the Aegean blue over tan, which several commenters, including @gscharnagl and @edwardgrzzz, noted as their favorite. The interior features, like the heated, ventilated, and multi-contour seats, were confirmed by @greenerdays11 to function as intended, adding to the vehicle's allure. Additionally, the wheels and seats were described to be in good condition, indicating that the vehicle has been well-maintained for its age.
Neutral: Some commenters sought clarification on specific details regarding the vehicle, such as the accuracy of the interior color listed as shale, questions about the functionality of the heated and ventilated seats, and requests for photos showing the underside and rear deck with the top down. @edwardgrzzz specifically pointed out potential minor issues, asking for close-up images of possible trim separations and bulges seen in pictures. @greenerdays11 responded positively, assuring the commenters that requested images would be provided and that the seats' features were fully operational.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the condition of certain interior elements, with @gscharnagl noting wear on the shift knob and the possible breakage of the passenger side cup holder, which @greenerdays11 confirmed has a crack. Furthermore, @Giacomo_pantani inquired about the replacement of the instrument panel and the non-original grille, suggesting past modifications. Also, @ninavich questioned the state of the top's hydraulic cylinders, but @greenerdays11 reassured that they had not seen leaks and mentioned replacements were made recently.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @Dollycat3 referred to it as 'beautiful' and one of their favorite Mercedes-Benz designs, while @BT5HY described it as a 'gorgeous car.' Overall, the car seems to garner positive attention for its looks and attractiveness within the luxury sedan market.
Neutral: Questions from potential buyers reflect a thorough understanding of the vehicle's condition and maintenance needs. @cpicorp1 inquired about key remotes and manuals, showing interest in the completeness of the car's documentation. @BT5HY presented a detailed list of inquiries about battery life, brake and tire conditions, and maintenance history, showcasing a practical interest in the car's performance and upkeep.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance, especially considering its age. @stuntmanmike asked whether the car sags after sitting, hinting at potential issues with the air suspension. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, acknowledged that maintenance would be required at some point and emphasized that owning a luxury vehicle like this may incur higher upkeep costs than a standard car, indicating that potential buyers should be prepared for ongoing maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic and performance qualities. @1PissedOffGrunt described it as "absolutely beautiful" and expressed a desire to purchase it if finances allowed, emphasizing that the future owner will be fortunate. @Sael highlighted the "timeless styling" of the car, while @ArtVandalay2 appreciated the build's sharpness and the seller's responsiveness to questions, thanking @jwicksnin for providing additional background.
Neutral: There were inquiries about specific aspects of the vehicle, particularly regarding the original parts and performance tuning. @ArtVandalay2 asked about the availability of original front-end body parts, and @ZamboR87 was curious if a driving video could be shared. @Sino99 expressed a mixed interest in the performance tuning of a non-turbo vehicle, questioning the cost-effectiveness but still acknowledging the car's beauty and reliability.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism about the performance modifications on a non-turbo vehicle. @Sino99 questioned the rationale behind spending on performance tuning when the costs may exceed that of simply acquiring a twin-turbo model that could achieve similar horsepower and torque. Despite the admiration for the vehicle, this comment hints at underlying concerns regarding the practicality of the modifications.
|
|
|