Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their excitement about the 1998 Subaru Impreza 22B STi, referring to it as a 'holy grail' and a 'unicorn' among JDM cars. @RumbleAuto noted the nostalgia it brings for fans of the Gran Turismo video game series, while @p1_motorcars_ltd praised Subaru's engineering prowess compared to its current state. @sleepneat described the car as 'impeccable,' generating enthusiasm for its auction, reflecting a shared admiration among enthusiasts stating that this model remains an iconic representation of Subaru's legacy.
Neutral: Commenters were eager to learn more about the car's specifications, with @jratcliffe and @Nbramley asking questions about fog lights and exhaust modifications, indicating a keen interest in the details of this specific model. @The Seller also provided insight into their selling process on BaT, detailing their facility and encouraging buyers interested in the car to set up appointments for viewing, showcasing professionalism and transparency. Some users, such as @expletive and @FactoryOptioned, reflected on the car's rarity and place in automotive history, drawing parallels with other revered models.
Negative: While the focus was mostly on positive remarks, a few users voiced concerns regarding the car's current condition and authenticity. @RR2017 raised questions about potential rusting on the wheel locks and functionality issues, expressing a desire for clarity on maintenance and any leaks. Additionally, @Bullish predicted that the auction would go high, which may imply some skepticism about its value or condition needing justification. Overall, the minor criticisms did not overshadow the overwhelming admiration shared by most commenters.
 |
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning appearance and desirable features. @Profcarnut noted that the black-on-black color scheme enhances the car's appeal, along with its unique upgrades such as the G body vented stainless steel targa bar, which adds to its rarity. @HB92647 and @Christmo echoed similar sentiments, praising the car's stance and wheel design, emphasizing that it looks phenomenal. @Entzuckt even described the car as "insanely beautiful," signaling that the upgrades made were tasteful and well-received by enthusiast eyes.
Neutral: Commenters sought additional information about the car's specifications and modifications, showcasing their interest but also their pragmatism regarding the vehicle's history. @averde414 inquired whether the car has been fully converted to meet U.S. specifications, while @MSQ asked about the oil leak related to the main bearing, emphasizing the need for thorough documentation. @boston2015 requested details on returning to stock rear seats and @Dannyobe raised concerns about the car passing California smog regulations, suggesting that potential buyers are weighing practical aspects before making a commitment.
Negative: Some users expressed concerns about certain modifications and aspects of the vehicle that could impact its desirability. @audiyos_bro criticized the lack of window tint, describing it as a problematic look, while @Showerfan shared a similar opinion against tinting, arguing it would detract from the car's pristine appearance. Advocacy for keeping the car untouched was echoed by @Jockr, who likened window tinting to undesirable modifications, suggesting a tension between personalization and maintaining original aesthetics that some users felt strongly about.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters, including @Dollycat3 and @UncleFred1, expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and excellent condition. @Dollycat3 referred to it as the 'nicest 190Db' seen in a long time, praising its well-maintained exterior and unique color combination of Arabian Gray over brown. Additionally, @vadimivanovich shared his experience of refurbishing a similar model, emphasizing the joy it brings to drive such a well-preserved classic. Other users reminisced about their own experiences with these vehicles, noting their charm and reliability.
Neutral: Several comments reflected curiosity about the vehicle's cold start mechanism with @NutmegCT and @ricosuave666 discussing the operation of the glow plug light. @NutmegCT appreciated the cold start video but suggested it would have been helpful to show the indicator light glowing before cranking. @CarFoolLane fondly mentioned the history linked to the brand and its connections to the Studebaker dealership, which adds a layer of nostalgia to the discussion. Meanwhile, some shared interesting automotive modifications and experiences with similar models, blending appreciation with technical insights.
Negative: A few comments highlighted some concerns about the vehicle's age and performance. @NutmegCT raised an eyebrow about its rapid cold start, hinting at a possible anomaly for such vintage tech. @timandsons reflected on the car's indestructibility but mentioned its lack of speed, while @brakeservo joked about the slowness of the vehicle, comparing it to a glacier in a drag race. However, the consensus remained largely positive with many acknowledging and fondly recalling their memories linked to similar models.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle for its rare color and low mileage, with @maybe_vini referring to it as an 'absolute stud' and expressing hope that it sells for a high price just like previous models. @SubaruKing notes the car's proper low mileage, while @scoobysouth points to desirable mods making it a compelling purchase for collectors. The overall impression is that this 2005 Subaru Impreza WRX STI is a highly sought-after vehicle that stands out in the market, with @Michaelmotorcar (The Seller) emphasizing its excellent condition and clean Carfax.
Neutral: Several commenters have provided observations without strong emotional investment. @RWN525 questioned why the 2005 model is considered the best among its peers, to which @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) responded by highlighting its superior qualities. Concerns were raised regarding the stock parts; @Richbam32 inquired about the included stock downpipe, and @Shawn1991 asked about imperfections on the car's body. @Michaelmotorcar (The Seller) addressed these queries and reassured potential bidders that the car is in remarkable condition, promising any minor blemishes will be resolved before the sale.
Negative: A few negative remarks indicated caution or concern about the vehicle. @Shawn1991 noted a visible scrape on the passenger side, prompting questions about other potential imperfections, while @JoeBPa and @Shawn1991 both pointed out some black areas visible in specific photos that raised doubts. @2005STI_GREG suggested that lightly modified cars should be returned to stock for buyers, implying a preference for the original state rather than aftermarket modifications. Overall, while most comments were positive, there were hints of skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition and modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg praised the vehicle as a 'fantastic and stellar Arnage R', highlighting the appealing Diamond Series features and the elegant white piping on the seats. @TheOMDude complimented the inviting interior, particularly the book matched veneers and diamond quilted upholstery, which creates a luxurious driving environment. @Vogelsang also shared admiration for the beauty of the Arnage, specifically mentioning the striking burl wood and white piping that enhances its aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: @Bordeaux expressed curiosity about why owners of luxury vehicles like this one often sell them shortly after purchase, despite having no mechanical issues. @zildjian11 pointed out that while the car appears to be a stunning example, more detailed photos and videos would be beneficial, and obtaining the build sheet would be a significant advantage for potential buyers. @winningmakes (The Seller) reassured users by stating that they would provide additional videos and service records in the coming days, as well as responding to inquiries about the car's features and maintenance history.
Negative: @WJK raised concerns regarding the absence of recent maintenance records and requested confirmation that all features, including the AC, are functioning correctly with no leaks. @Sparky2018 requested various specific photos and videos to inspect the vehicle's condition, including details on the sunroof and any potential paint defects, indicating a demand for thorough transparency. @cargogh humorously contrasted the vehicle's luxury with their own childhood experience, yearning for such an extravagant ride rather than their school bus experience.
|
 |
Positive: @P-man commented on their fond memories of owning a 1988 928S4, emphasizing it was their favorite among many Porsches due to its looks and performance. @Werkstatt echoed this sentiment, describing the powerful 5.0 DOHC V8 as an unforgettable experience. @Tobyallen praised the vehicle's aesthetics, stating that the white color is beautiful and the engine compartment is impeccably clean. @Mango51 also expressed excitement over the car's condition, highlighting its timeless design and comfort, suggesting that the future owner will be very satisfied. @becks European (The Seller), noted that the car is clean, well-maintained, and ready to drive, assuring buyers of a great experience with the transaction.
Neutral: Comments included discussions about specific details of the car, with @pantera928 inquiring about the A/C compressor and whether it blows cold air. @QueenElizabeth3 asked if the wheels were staggered and if there were any cracks around the A/C vents, to which @becks European (The Seller) responded affirmatively. They also handled inquiries about the car's undertrays and condition of various components, confirming that it had been well taken care of and addressed potential issues with the instrument cluster and other features. @Fleche_dOr brought attention to a possible discrepancy with vehicle speed measurements, prompting further conversation about the car's performance.
Negative: Some comments indicated concerns regarding the 928 model's maintenance costs. @Tobyallen shared disappointing experiences with other 928s that had been poorly maintained, suggesting prospective buyers should be prepared for upkeep. @02chuck questioned potential cracking around the instrument pod. @IronSwapper expressed uncertainty about the exhaust fumes observed in a video. @becks European (The Seller) addressed these issues candidly, acknowledging some cosmetic damage while assuring the car remains structurally sound. These discussions point to the notion that while the car is appealing, vigilant buyers must be aware of the historical challenges associated with owning a 928.
|
 |
Positive: @Rottie325 appreciates the simplicity of the truck, mentioning it fits the needs of an older individual. @stugottz highlights the importance of the truck's solid build, expressing satisfaction with its construction. @The_Barrys comments on the nostalgic charm of older Ford models, specifically mentioning their love for the classic single cab design. Overall, many commenters express a sense of admiration for the truck's vintage appeal and overall quality, which contribute to a positive reception.
Neutral: Several commenters sought or provided additional details about the truck. @JHernandez inquired about a potential odometer rollback mentioned in the Carfax report, to which @StevensCarsPNW clarified that the entries before and after the flagged date are consistent, lending credibility to the mileage claims. @Goochbw and @Todd_Z. discussed details about the truck's bed size, confirming it is a short bed while addressing potential confusion about the dual gas tanks. This exchange contributes to a more informative atmosphere among potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns about the truck's condition were raised by several commenters. @sernow pointed out that the spare tire was missing and questioned the integrity of the hardware, while @simmz noted issues with the volt gauge's functionality. @Valentin45 observed inconsistencies in the fuel gauge readings, indicating possible issues with the truck's electrical system. @Juanote expressed concerns about a missing closure lever for the driver side vent window, further highlighting that there are a few minor but notable issues that potential buyers should consider.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle's overall aesthetic, particularly praising its beautiful interior, emblematic of Rolls Royce craftsmanship. @mrpotty remarked on the beauty of the interior, while @GDogg simply described it as a "great looking SZ." Others, like @JBFla, appreciated the reputation of the shop that conducted the inspection, indicating confidence in the vehicle’s potential for restoration. @89lincolntc highlighted the possibility of the car being a worthwhile project for a mechanically inclined individual, suggesting it could be a rewarding journey for someone willing to invest time and effort.
Neutral: Many comments shifted towards a more neutral stance, acknowledging the car's condition and the challenges associated with its restoration. @F117driver raised questions about the vehicle's starting issues, seeking clarification from the seller, while @David_P pointed out that the car could be a good project for someone with expertise in Rolls-Royce mechanical systems. There were also mentions of the interior's good state, which could save potential buyers additional costs in repairs. The seller, @3boysblessed, provided transparency about the car's history and maintenance, reinforcing its potential value despite its current non-running status.
Negative: Conversely, some commenters expressed concerns regarding the vehicle’s practicality and associated costs of restoration. @rufcar pointed out that running models are available at much lower prices, suggesting that this specific car may not justify the asking price due to its repairs. @KAK69 critiqued the steering wheel, insinuating it was a less desirable modification, while @AML1 noted that restoring these vehicles could be financially burdensome. The overarching sentiment was that significant investment would be necessary for anyone considering the car, particularly for those without the requisite mechanical knowledge.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the 2015 Mercedes-Benz GL63 AMG, noting its impressive features and aesthetic appeal. @hdfinder47 described it as a "very nice, fun and practical driver," while @gscharnagl praised the color combination, referring to it as beautiful. @Thetatebaumercollection also highlighted the vehicle's great condition, mentioning that it looks even better in person, and @MPM97turbo pointed out its rarity and good mileage, suggesting that the future owner will be very happy with their purchase.
Neutral: The seller, @NewAgeAuto, engaged actively with potential buyers, providing vital information about the vehicle and addressing specific inquiries. They confirmed details such as the presence of DISTONIC features and the inclusion of two keys, while also assuring @bbrotzman that undercarriage photos would be uploaded promptly. The seller communicated about the car's condition, noting that it had zero leaks and was super clean, while also responding to questions regarding shipping estimates, stating the costs for both open and enclosed transport.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, several commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's $349 documentation fee. @SockPuppet expressed frustration over the doc fee, suggesting dealers rarely learn from customer feedback. @georgepehanick questioned if the fee included a full tank of gas, to which @NewAgeAuto confirmed it included Shell 93, but others like @Ptedes1639 and @Thunderuppaul voiced their disapproval of the fee altogether. @CASHBUY3R's inquiry about the vehicle's damage history remained unanswered in detail, which might leave potential buyers uneasy.
|
 |
Positive: @Calamari_Jujutsu shared a positive experience with their 2019 SE sedan, praising its reliability, winter handling, and ease of maintenance, expressing confidence that this car will perform similarly well. @Subzerospeed mentioned they had a 2015 model that was problem-free and suggested potential upgrades to enhance performance under a certain budget. @RobMasecar (The Seller) confirmed that the vehicle has not had engine issues and provided thorough details about maintenance, stating that routine oil changes were performed every 5,000 miles, which contributed to the car's good condition. Additionally, he explained the factory recall for the coolant sensor system, indicating this was more of a precautionary measure than a fault.
Neutral: Comments from @MikeTheTank, @PhantomMensa, and @Uby67vw1958 included inquiries about potential repairs and the condition of the vehicle, including the presence of any rust and the state of the windshield. @RobMasecar (The Seller) provided detailed responses, mentioning that no repairs are necessary and describing how he addressed any rust formation with rust treatment methods. Furthermore, he elaborated on the windshield condition, clarifying the minor nature of the rock impact and its position outside the line of sight, which may help mitigate concerns over its potential need for replacement.
Negative: @krazytrkr raised concerns about possible engine issues common with the model, specifically the head gasket problems, while @Polo40 brought up their past experience with an EVAP purge valve issue that could arise around 65,000 miles, questioning whether it had been replaced in this vehicle. @Scupper pointed out that two of the vehicle's tires were older, dating back to 2019, which raises questions about their longevity and safety for longer trips. These comments reflect apprehensions about possible mechanical issues and the car's history that could impact its reliability in the future.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its exceptional condition and low mileage. @jdjonesdr exclaimed, "Holy smokes!" and @dottslots called it "Beautiful!" Other fans of the truck, like @Gmmuscleusa and @HuntingClassics, praised the classic design and options, noting it is a standout among 88-98 GM trucks. @jrb007 even mentioned how adjusted for inflation, this truck would still be a remarkable deal compared to newer models. Overall, the general consensus among these positive comments showcases a deep appreciation for the truck's aesthetic appeal and rarity.
Neutral: Commenters also provided informative and factual observations about the truck. @Haybub26 remarked on the model's history by discussing the changes in design and when the body style was produced until 1999. @hairyolds was skeptical about the low mileage, suggesting that the vehicle hadn't been utilized much, possibly due to unhooked speedometers. Meanwhile, @Rainmaker13 questioned inconsistencies found in the vehicle's Carfax report regarding its registration history. These comments offered a more measured view, balancing excitement with curiosity and caution.
Negative: On the flip side, some comments expressed criticism regarding the vehicle's price, with @El_barbas deeming $32k "ridiculous" for a pickup. @89lincolntc voiced dislike for the gauges, seeing them as outdated and not fitting for a vehicle of its stature. Despite the criticisms, users like @Intimidator04 defended the truck's value, contrasting it with the high prices of new trucks, suggesting this classic offers more durability and character than current options. Overall, the negative comments reflected a concern over pricing and certain design choices, but did not overshadow the overall appreciation for the truck.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed strong admiration for the vehicle, noting it as a stunning build and unique in its class. @theguygrm reflected on their nostalgia and excitement seeing the FJ40 equipped with 80 series axles, describing it as 'a clean build.' @boaboyoz called it 'fanbloodytastic' and considered the construction 'bonkers,' while @tlcamg shared their awe, recounting their own experiences with Land Cruisers and emphasizing the impressive modifications of this one. @Raptorman220 proclaimed it the pinnacle of FJ40 possibilities, and a former owner, @cf1128, highlighted the exceptional craftsmanship and attention to detail in this truck, further amplifying its appeal among enthusiasts.
Neutral: There were several neutral comments that discussed the vehicle's specifications and practical use considerations. @adrenalinsports, the seller, provided detailed specifications of the truck, including its Chevy crate motor, enhanced suspension components, and extensive modifications like custom roll bars and a high-capacity winch. @ejwil raised thoughtful inquiries about accessibility and everyday functionality, like getting in and out of the truck, particularly referencing the absence of doors and asking for visual confirmation of usability. Additionally, @woytovich questioned how well the vehicle performs on highways despite being a modified rock crawler, which the seller addressed, claiming it handles well even at highway speeds.
Negative: A few comments contained critiques or concerns about the vehicle. @notlikelytowin4 acknowledged that while the truck showcased significant custom work, it also indicated a lesser original Toyota component presence, hinting at a loss of authenticity. Another commenter, @ejwil, raised safety concerns about the roll bars' placement and how they might affect accessibility, suggesting that ergonomics could be challenging due to the design. @Rat70fj also pointed out the difficulty in locating the VIN, implying potential legal or verification issues for potential buyers. Overall, these comments tempered the otherwise overwhelmingly positive reception with practical concerns about usability and compliance.
|
 |
Positive: @scouttrooper6 finds the vehicle appealing and appreciates its capability as a daily driver, especially with the high-low range transfer case for improved 4WD performance. @J-Cup expresses great enthusiasm for the Jimny, considering it a worthy addition to their collection. @minitoo envisions the Jimny as the perfect vehicle for outdoor adventures with their dog and shows interest in the logistics of shipping it, while also noting the shipping cost appears reasonable compared to estimates from BaT.
Neutral: @mbz300sdl inquires about the cleanliness and functional aspects of the vehicle while keeping it professional and polite, highlighting the importance of maintenance and comfort features. @stg83 comments on the vehicle's upkeep and asks about storage options, showing a practical interest in the logistics of acquiring the Jimny. Multiple sellers provide reassurance about the vehicle's performance, cleanliness, and working features, indicating a well-maintained example.
Negative: There were no distinctly negative comments about the vehicle. However, minor concerns mentioned by potential buyers relate to tolerances around towing capacity and performance comparisons, with @HahnSolo questioning how the vehicle's gearing and acceleration compare to other models. @carelallen seeks additional information on specific towing accessories, showing a level of concern for compatibility with existing needs.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the Riviera, with many users praising its beauty and classic design. @Kod13 calls it a 'Beautiful car,' while @a410traveler describes it as a 'classy personal luxury car oozing with panache.' @Baronvonbrutus mentions that the Riviera combines comfort and aesthetics, noting its superior looks compared to modern vehicles. @boaboyoz adds to the praise by calling the car a 'bloody beauty' and appreciates its unique color. Overall, the consensus is that the Riviera exemplifies the best of 1960s automotive design and luxury.
Neutral: Certain comments dive into technical aspects and historical context, providing informative details about the Riviera's design evolution and production. @Bordeaux discusses the car's evolution over the decades, indicating its international acclaim and the changes in style and features. Users like @Rivnut share insights about minor differences between the 1963 and 1964 models, mentioning the changes in badging and interior features. The discussions offer a balanced view of the car's historical significance and market placement without veering into overly critical or overly celebratory territory.
Negative: On the downside, some users raise concerns about specific issues with the car. @Kilmouski questions the condition of the vehicle, noting potential rust and requesting details about any operational problems. @Rivnut, while knowledgeable, confirms that the weak hinge on the glove box is a common issue, pointing out the plastic design flaw. @EDCK111 warns about the need to avoid revving the vehicle past a certain RPM to prevent engine damage, hinting at potential performance concerns. These criticisms suggest that while the Riviera is cherished, it does have some persistent mechanical issues that enthusiasts should be aware of.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters like @GeorgeAlfa3 and @Danbeau expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and performance, highlighting its striking color combination of blue and tan and praising the Boxster for its handling, comfort, and style. @TheCommonGear_com noted that early Boxsters present tremendous value and indicated excitement for potential future appreciation. @dmg00000 appreciated the seller's assurance that the trunk could accommodate practical items like a snow shovel, demonstrating a friendly interaction and interest in the car's functionality.
Neutral: Comments from @MichaelsMotorCarsPA, the seller, provided essential details regarding the Boxster's maintenance history, indicating that regular service has been performed and confirming the clean condition of the car with no rust present. The seller also answered inquiries about the vehicle’s oil change history and answered questions regarding brake pad measurements and tire date codes accurately. Overall, the seller maintained open lines of communication and encouraged potential bidders to ask questions while providing transparency about the car's condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised by commenters such as @Joey0ne regarding the last recorded oil change date as compared to the current mileage of the vehicle, creating some doubts regarding the maintenance timeline. Additionally, @anth_swan sought clarity regarding the brake pad and rotor measurements, reflecting a desire for more detailed information to assure the vehicle's upkeep and readiness. The humorous inquiry by @dmg00000 about trunk space could be interpreted as an underlying skepticism about the practicality of the vehicle for everyday use.
|
 |
Positive: @Craven noted the vehicle's striking color and sharp 80s styling, emphasizing its visual appeal. @BigT77 expressed admiration for the blue on blue color scheme, describing it as a desirable low-mile convertible, while wishing luck to the new owner. @yellowc7vert shared a nostalgic connection, recalling a similar blue on blue ’87 convertible they previously owned and loved, underscoring the vehicle's aesthetic charm. Additionally, @JohnF1966 highlighted the rarity of the 1 year only wheels along with the attractive colors and performance of the L98 street engine, indicating strong appreciation for the car's specifications.
Neutral: Several comments reflected on the C4's reputation for value, with @sliproc mentioning that these models provide significant performance for the cost. They noted the aesthetic appeal of the color, further sharing a personal bias for the shade as it matched their own classic vehicle. @bmclean122 pointed out that C4 convertibles offer a unique driving experience and are an excellent entry into Corvette ownership, recommending it particularly for those new to the brand. This perspective added a practical consideration to the overall discussions about the vehicle while not explicitly favoring or criticizing it.
Negative: @yellowc7vert raised concerns regarding the apparently improper care of the vehicle, specifically referencing the copper discoloration of the valve covers, which could indicate that harsh cleaning chemicals were used, a common issue for L98 engines. This comment hinted at potential maintenance issues that could concern prospective buyers. In a more general context, there were no significant negative comments regarding the vehicle overall, but the mention of care indicates a need for caution when evaluating its condition.
|
 |
Positive: @swordfishtrombone praised the vehicle's stunning design, specifically its perfect lines and great presentation. Similarly, @atty2001 expressed admiration for the Jaguar XJS, highlighting its beauty and complimenting the seller for their impressive vehicle presentation. @Tomme9 shared a personal story of his wife's affection for a Jaguar and suggested that these cars are undervalued despite their driving enjoyment and aesthetic appeal. @CoolClassicsIntl (The Seller) reinforced this sentiment by stating that anyone purchasing the vehicle will receive a charming cruiser that has been serviced and well-maintained.
Neutral: @CoolClassicsIntl (The Seller) provided a clear overview of the auction, detailing that the car underwent extensive services and has been driven to ensure its reliability. They also addressed inquiries about the vehicle's paint and bodywork, confirming that no significant repairs had been made. @atty2001 had several questions about the original radio, heated seats, gauge lighting, rear brake servicing, and any gas smell in the interior, which the seller answered thoroughly, enhancing the transparency of the auction process. @V12LUV inquired about a current smog certificate, indicating the potential buyer's interest in compliance with local regulations.
Negative: Some potential buyers expressed concerns about the vehicle's condition. @RAP1 questioned whether the paint was original or if it had been resprayed, and @Adobe speculated that the rear trunk may have been painted, which could imply possible issues with the car's surface. @classiccarman57 suggested that the seller's auction was adversely affected by another simultaneous listing of a similar Jaguar XJS, highlighting the competitive nature of the market. @Megapositron noted an abundance of XJS models available on the auction site, which may affect demand for this particular vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @VantageAuto highlights that the turbo diesel powered X5 is in excellent condition with high performance, mentioning it drives like new with strong acceleration, firm brakes, and a tight suspension. The vehicle features a premium package and has been well maintained throughout its history, driving smoothly on Florida roads. Customers appreciate the transparency of @VantageAuto, who has established a solid reputation with over 1,700 completed auctions and emphasizes the immaculate state of the vehicle without any signs of damage.
Neutral: There are inquiries about the vehicle's features, including whether it has adaptive cruise control and brake assist, along with requests for maintenance records and documentation on any past damage or repairs. @VantageAuto responds to these comments, stating that while no documentation is available, the damage was classified as minor and that there are no records of panel replacements or frame damage. Some users specifically ask for a cold start video to ensure the vehicle runs smoothly and to check for timing chain noise, which @VantageAuto agrees to provide if requested by the winning bidder.
Negative: Comments express some concerns regarding potential issues with the timing chain that can affect the vehicle significantly if it were to fail. @Dirty911 mentions that timing chain repairs can be costly. Additionally, @flipphones and others are vocal about wanting assurance on the vehicle's maintenance history, voicing skepticism about the lack of documentation and clarifications on whether specific issues have been checked or maintained. Although @VantageAuto shares confidence in the vehicle's condition, some potential buyers remain cautious due to these standard concerns regarding reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors have expressed their appreciation for the truck's aesthetic and features. @dhonthehill complimented the truck, noting that despite the steering wheel being upside down, it is a really nice vehicle. @ManyWinters highlighted the charm of the old truck, specifically mentioning the Wild Turkey radiator overflow bottle as a lovely touch. @boaboyoz described the truck as a "lovely light blue C10" and referred to it as a "sweet build," further affirming a positive reception of its appearance.
Neutral: From the comments, some practical questions were raised regarding the functionality and specifications of the truck. @Saturnsteve inquired if the heater was functional and whether the truck had power steering. @Dale_I showed interest in various features, asking about the working condition of gauges, windshield wipers, lights, and the possibility of obtaining a driving video. @THOWARD69 (The Seller) responded to several queries about the vehicle's features, indicating that the truck has a heater but lacks power steering and air conditioning, and he has committed to providing further information about the gauges and other functionalities.
Negative: Concerns have also been voiced regarding certain aspects of the truck's condition. @WIZZZZ questioned the quality of the gaps on the tailgate and driver's door, indicating potential issues with alignment or fitment. Additionally, @Dale_I sought clarification about whether the driver door was fully closed in certain pictures. @THOWARD69 (The Seller) addressed some of these concerns by acknowledging functionality issues with the tachometer and committing to answering specific queries about rear gear ratios and gauge performance, revealing a lack of clarity that some potential buyers might find troubling.
|
 |
Positive: @RogueMotorSports (The Seller) highlighted the Cayenne Turbo's appeal with its low mileage for the year and an attractive Black on Red color combination. The car comes with a good amount of service history, and recent servicing has been completed, which should reassure potential buyers about its condition. Additionally, their willingness to provide more photos, videos, and shipping quotes demonstrates a commitment to customer service and accessibility.
Neutral: There were several inquiries about the aftermarket headlights and their functionality. @Timbarrato and @DanD04 raised concerns regarding the adjustment fault and whether the current headlights offered the same features as the original PDLS+ headlights. @RogueMotorSports responded by clarifying that the aftermarket lights had similar functionalities but required coding to eliminate the fault. Furthermore, questions from @BlackhorseLA regarding potential transfer case issues and coolant crossover line upgrades were addressed, with reassurances that the car does not show signs of major problems.
Negative: Some comments expressed skepticism about the vehicle, particularly regarding the aftermarket headlights and concerns from @DanD04 about the overall care of the car. @jprobertson brought up the potential expense associated with a failing transfer case, prompting @RogueMotorSports to clarify that there were no signs of failure. Additionally, @Speedy4 humorously noted the maintenance required for black cars, while @DanD04 pointed out visible wear on the wheels, which @RogueMotorSports confirmed were getting refinished. Overall, some commenters exhibited doubt regarding the aftermarket modifications and their implications for the car's value and performance.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle being auctioned, a 2014 Porsche Cayman, has received numerous compliments from various commentators. @ex099 expressed admiration for the Cayman, stating it is an underrated car and emphasized their love for the design, particularly noting the unique Yachting Blue interior. @Lilptr shared their enthusiasm for the Cayman, stating that the driving experience is exceptional and assertively declared it as a top choice for a sports car. @blubusdrvr commended the seller for their engagement and responsiveness, indicating a positive interaction with potential buyers. Furthermore, @Rocketman63 appreciated the rarity of the vehicle's color combination, affirming that the next owner will be acquiring an exceptional Cayman.
Neutral: The seller, @prelude_dash, has been transparent about the vehicle's condition, disclosing minor cosmetic defects such as paint chips and slight curb rash. They provided detailed information regarding tire age, clutch condition, and maintenance history, including the absence of service records for certain crucial components like the water pump and thermostat. Several commentators inquired about the DME report and offered assistance with clarifications, showcasing a collaborative exchange of information about the vehicle’s maintenance status.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the vehicle's maintenance history and current state. Commentators like @bones302 and @MrWick questioned the age of the tires, suggesting they might need replacement soon, as they observed older manufacturing dates. @Rocketman63 further raised skepticism about the validity of the DME report, expressing doubt that the car could have zero over-rev counts given its mileage and history. @DNJONES requested clarification on previous maintenance records, including ignition coils and spark plugs, highlighting a perceived lack of concrete evidence for previous services, which may deter potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praises the vehicle as a "beautiful, well cared for 420SEL" and expresses admiration for its aesthetic appeal. Similarly, @jas212 shares their love for the car, stating it is their dream vehicle and prefers it over newer models, appreciating the classic design over modern features. @cusam89u adds to the positive sentiments by noting that these cars are "wonderful driving cars" and believes they are undervalued at the current bid.
Neutral: @Fredkoo playfully questions @Dollycat3's speed in commenting, suggesting a sense of community and engagement among participants. @Bordeaux commends @Dollycat3 for their enthusiastic contributions to the conversation, highlighting the excitement and camaraderie among the commenters. GearheadGuys (The Seller) introduces the car to the Bring a Trailer community, providing detailed upkeep information and extending an invitation for questions, which establishes a transparent selling process.
Negative: @jrc67 raises a concern about potential damage, inquiring if there are any cracks in the dash, which suggests unease about the car's interior condition. In response, GearheadGuys (The Seller) assures that there are no cracks, aiming to alleviate worries from potential bidders. This interaction underscores the importance of maintaining buyer confidence amidst concerns about the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 appreciates the Cherokee's great color and wonderful interior, suggesting that after addressing necessary repairs, it can be enjoyed thoroughly. @Brgrman shares nostalgic memories, recalling that his father bought a similar model in 1979, which he drove at 16, emphasizing the pleasant memories associated with such vehicles. @Valkyrja believes the two-door Cherokees are the best-looking, showcasing a preference for their aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: @JustMe1 raises questions about the vehicle's reliability for a long trip, indicating a level of caution about its readiness for travel. @BlueChipCar (The Seller) responds that they are comfortable with the vehicle's reliability for a trip from Austin to Little Rock, but notes a minor transmission leak as a potential issue. @tm1129 inquires about the gas door placement and the condition of the floorboards, signaling curiosity about the vehicle's functional aspects.
Negative: @firefighter17 asks if the engine produces any smoke while running and requests additional pictures, expressing concern about the vehicle's mechanical condition. @ChadBugg68 questions the various holes and screws found below side mirrors and on the vehicle's body, suggesting possible issues related to its upkeep or modifications. @notlikelytowin4 indicates uncertainty about the start-up condition of his similar vehicle, hinting at potential lack of maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: @contractor mentions that based on their experience with a similar vehicle, the condition of this one is consistent with the mileage stated, suggesting that even though the dash is an issue, replacements are readily available and relatively easy to install. @amotorsports, the seller, believes the vehicle has around 155k miles, which aligns with the insights provided by other commentators regarding the vehicle's maintenance.
Neutral: There are mixed opinions regarding modifications to the vehicle. @contractor notes the base radio is a significant advantage for those who may want to modify, as upgrading from a navigation unit can be complicated. @CharlesM3 shares their positive experience with a Grom VLine CarPlay upgrade on a different model, giving the impression that upgrades can be successful if done correctly.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition are raised by @Str8edge6936, who points out that moderate rust is present and questions if it was professionally repaired. The seller, @amotorsports, defends the work done to the vehicle, stating that it was treated properly and only exhibits minor rust without significant issues. Additionally, @DaveMavs points out that the instrument cluster has been swapped from a salvage vehicle, which raises further questions about the vehicle's history.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the Tritan A2, highlighting its uniqueness and historical significance. @RobertfromTX exclaimed, "Wow. Just wow. Can’t wait to watch this auction," reflecting a positive buzz around the vehicle. @VintiqueMotors noted its rarity, mentioning that it is one of only ten built, which adds to its allure. The vehicle evokes nostalgia, as seen in comments from @gabrian333, who shared childhood memories associated with the vehicle, underscoring its cultural impact. @WOB (The Seller) emphasized that this vehicle not only runs and drives well but is also a fun addition to any collection, likening owning it to a childhood dream.
Neutral: Several comments focused on practical inquiries regarding the Tritan A2, with commenters asking about the vehicle's specifications and functionality. For example, @ironcity18 inquired about its gas mileage, while @no.radar joked about needing 'breadsticks' to go with the pizza delivery theme. Some users expressed curiosity about the vehicle's capacity and operational features, such as the need for driving videos and specifics on its state and performance. @KilroyNo1 deposed about the need for a detailed list of any non-functioning components on the vehicle, showing an analytical perspective amid the enthusiasm.
Negative: However, not all comments were entirely positive. Some users exhibited skepticism regarding the vehicle's practicality and safety. @nagol98567 raised concerns about the functionality of the odometer, suggesting it may be non-functional, which led to questions about reliability. @3Pedalonly brought up concerns regarding unaddressed inquiries in previous auctions. Additionally, @DB6 humorously remarked on the potential for the vehicle to be mistaken for a hovercraft, implying doubts about its feasibility as a car. Overall, while many comments reflected excitement, there were cautionary notes regarding the vehicle's performance and history.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 commented on the vehicle's comfortable interior, describing it as a "beautiful cushy comfy way to go," which suggests a high level of satisfaction with the comfort qualities of the van. Positive remarks highlight the overall experience of traveling in the vehicle, indicating that it is enjoyable and pleasant for users. Additionally, the seller, @IBY, provided links to various videos showcasing the engine, exterior, and interior of the vehicle, which likely helps enhance the vehicle's appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: @jasonschaeffer1 raised a question regarding the functionality of the rear seat, specifically inquiring if it swivels to face a desk, requesting further photographic evidence. This comment suggests curiosity about the vehicle's versatility for work-related activities, but does not indicate a strong opinion either way. @orvnlan also expressed interest in visual documentation about sleeping arrangements, hinting at practicality and usage considerations that potential buyers might have when examining the van's features.
Negative: @Manistee noted that there was a significant price jump, while @NevadaChuck commented on exclusivity, implying that it might be priced higher to deter certain buyers. @HPLM expressed confusion regarding the need for a head-unit change, questioning whether the new system includes navigation and a rear backup camera and indicated that concern over missing features could negatively impact perceptions of the vehicle. Lastly, @crabtreem's inquiry about picture 146, questioning if it depicted the old radio, suggests a level of skepticism about the vehicle's upgrades and authenticity.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received ample proactive maintenance from @ktCamden, the seller, who ensured that all necessary upgrades and repairs were addressed, such as replacing brakes, the supercharger nose, and suspension control arms. @JackMac remarked positively about the improvements made to the L320, noting that such attention to maintenance can lead to a rewarding driving experience. Furthermore, several commenters praised the appealing color combination of the Range Rover Sport, with @JoshAtPlay highlighting its attractive design and @gstepp22 expressing admiration for the hard work that @ktCamden put into refurbishing the vehicle. Additionally, @ktCamden's efforts to maintain a detailed account of repairs and updates, alongside offering assurance regarding the vehicle's engine performance, have been well-received.
Neutral: Commenters like @Vr00m and @JoshAtPlay discussed the lack of rear seat space humorously, indicating that while the backseat might not be spacious, it is not uncommon in this type of vehicle. @gstepp22 shared his similar experiences with an RR, contributing to a balanced discussion around typical issues in these models, particularly regarding maintenance needs and practicality. Also mentioned was the potential for modifying the vehicle, with @JoshAtPlay providing tips on transitioning the supercharged V8 into an LR4, suggesting a viable alternative for those seeking more space without sacrificing power.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the limited rear seat space, especially by @Vr00m, who found the backseat room to be surprisingly small. @Series147 noted that the supercharged V8 engine can consume oil, adding to the list of common issues faced by these vehicles. @gstepp22 mentioned that his own RR had several challenges requiring significant repairs, revealing a reality that these models demand regular care or risk costly breakdowns. @X mentioned issues with the cooling system as an Achilles heel, underscoring the need for vigilance in maintenance. Additionally, @ktCamden acknowledged minor imperfections, like a filled windshield chip and leather upholstery dyeing attempts, which, while not major flaws, indicate some compromises in the car's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as a 'bodacious burgundy Chevelle' and expresses admiration for it, calling it a 'delightful example' with good wishes for the sale. @RMQ333 also shares positive sentiments, stating it is 'very nice.' Additionally, @K51020Ranch fondly recalls his first Chevelle, saying it was a nice looking '67 Chevelle and reminisces about his connections to the model, bringing a sense of nostalgia to the conversation. @rich0017 appreciates the car's look, asking specifics like whether it has power steering, indicating their interest in the vehicle.
Neutral: Several users pose questions or seek clarifications about the car’s specifications and history. @Colonnadenut inquires about the radiator top plate, showing interest in its authenticity. @vscottjensen asks about potential spots of rust and the condition of various components, indicating a desire for thorough inspection. Technical clarifications regarding the VIN and engine type are made by @jeffschevelle and @ssterry, noting that they discuss details and nuances related to the car's original build based on different manufacturing plants. @MCTECH integrates further inquiry about whether it is an SS model, reflecting curiosity about the historical accuracy of the vehicle.
Negative: However, there are also concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and authenticity. @PlatinumKid mentions difficulty in communicating with the seller regarding inspection of the car, expressing frustration over their lack of response. @Stingroyer notes that nothing is inherently wrong with a 6-cylinder car but raises questions about the specifics of the engine and drivetrain. Additionally, @MCTECH shows concern about the alignment of the hood in the photos, indicating a perceived issue with the vehicle's fitment. Such inquiries suggest potential doubts about the car's overall upkeep or modifications.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received many compliments, with @kgt0001 describing it as a 'beautiful truck' and @Pathfinder1806 expressing appreciation for its aesthetic appeal, particularly the ride height shown in one of the pictures. @Chevyguy1978 and @neutron88 also echoed similar sentiments, praising its stunning restoration and well-executed modifications. @PSFarm referred to it as a cool truck that's easy to drive without worry, highlighting its power with the LS-2 engine rated at 400 hp and 400 lb-ft of torque. Overall, the truck's appearance and build quality have been well received.
Neutral: Several commenters have raised questions regarding the technical aspects and minor details of the vehicle. @Stuttgart1946 inquired about any paint chips or flaws, while @Lmayr sought clarification on a noted mechanical issue regarding odometer readings. The seller, @siskiyousam, has been responsive to these inquiries, explaining the circumstances around the replacement speedometer and agreeing that the engine likely maintains a stock configuration, noting that it runs well despite a lack of detailed maintenance records. Furthermore, there was some discussion about the hidden stereo installation, showing that many features of the vehicle drew interest.
Negative: On the downside, a few comments pointed out potential concerns with the truck's condition. @Jobear mentioned the disintegration of door panels, although @siskiyousam stated that no such issues were observed when reviewing the images. Additionally, @kgt0001 pointed out what appeared to be an oil leak, leading to further engagements between the seller and commentors about its source, with some finding it more than just a drip. This initiated a clarifying dialogue, which suggests that not all viewers are entirely convinced of the truck's pristine condition.
|
 |
Positive: @maxs1 describes the vehicle as an "awesome car" that has the potential to be restored to excellent mechanical and cosmetic condition. @bensallam90 (The Seller) assures potential buyers that the car is in good driving condition, with all gauges functioning properly and a smooth shifting transmission. The seller highlights that significant maintenance has been performed, including the rebuilding of hydraulic cylinders and servicing the transmission, indicating that the vehicle has been well cared for. Moreover, the seller expresses confidence in the car's attractiveness, stating it still turns heads and could be superb with some additional attention.
Neutral: @Tommythetucan and @DanD04 ask about various specifics regarding the vehicle's performance, such as its driving condition, the functionality of the A/C, and the condition of the soft top's rear window. @bensallam90 (The Seller) responds to these inquiries, confirming that the vehicle drives well overall and acknowledges some minor maintenance needs due to its age. He also mentions the A/C issue, suggesting it's likely low on Freon, but notes it was functioning properly during the summer. The seller provides additional detail about the condition of components like the headliner and hydraulic systems, reinforcing that the vehicle has been maintained.
Negative: @maxs1 points out that the vehicle needs a lot of work, with @Igor964 remarking that significant investment may be necessary given its mileage. There are concerns raised regarding the cooling system as @DanD04 inquires about the A/C, and @bensallam90 admits that the A/C is not blowing cold. This openness to discuss defects may indicate the vehicle is not in perfect condition, leading to some skepticism among potential buyers about the investment required to restore it. Additionally, @bensallam90 acknowledges that some bidders may leave negative comments to drive down the price, suggesting a charged atmosphere regarding the vehicle's value.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle’s performance, particularly mentioning the impressive power and torque gains associated with tuning options. @redtanrt10 highlighted @genevamotorcars' great inventory of Cayenne Diesels, indicating a positive reputation in the market. @campodf shared a personal experience with the Tunezilla tune, emphasizing the responsiveness and efficiency it provides, as well as the enjoyment and satisfaction derived from tuning a similar vehicle.
Neutral: The discussions revealed that the vehicle is being sold by @genevamotorcars on behalf of another party and had not been individually tuned or modified by the seller. Many inquired about specifics such as the presence of a FlashZilla device and the details of the DELETED DPF system. @kttocs and @jheb31 sought clarification on the logistics of the tune and expressed interest in the vehicle's exhaust sound, adding a layer of inquiry about its features without expressing strong sentiment.
Negative: While the overall feedback was positive, there were some concerns regarding the vehicle’s tuning status and performance metrics. @z_lanfear raised questions about potential turbo lag and the effectiveness of the tune, while @kttocs noted that the DPF system was physically removed rather than using software. These concerns suggest that while the vehicle has many selling points, potential buyers still seek assurance about the modifications and their implications.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received several positive remarks regarding its overall condition and aesthetics. @aortiger highlighted the car as beautiful and very clean, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. Additionally, @anthonyjp appreciated the car's great stance, which suggests a favorable impression of its appearance and modifications. @KSquires expressed interest by noting that a previously sold vehicle from the seller had good auction results, indicating confidence in this vehicle's potential.
Neutral: The seller, @Collectibleclassics, provided detailed responses to inquiries about the vehicle’s specifics, such as the front splitter and wheels. He confirmed that the front splitter has minor wear typical of a low vehicle and clarified that the paint is original with paint protection film applied. Other buyers also had questions about the vehicle's modifications and condition, which the seller addressed by stating that the coolant pipes appear in good shape and he does not see signs of substantial modifications to the engine, even though the ride is slightly lower than stock.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about potential issues with the vehicle. @Markjc56 pointed out a high paint reading on the hood and the need for attention to the front splitter. @SVXRide questioned the method used to lower the ride height and noted potential scoring on the brake rotors. @RockenJag also inquired about whether the original parts were available and expressed skepticism regarding possible performance modifications, highlighting common practices in aftermarket vehicle alterations.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and desirability. @JSRDVM notes that they would buy the car if they had the money, while @cpick appreciates the stunning specifications. @xXANCHORMONXx calls it a phenomenal car and praises its overall quality. @Stallion911 calls it stunning and praises the color combination, mentioning a neighbor with a similar model. Overall, the general consensus among these commenters is that the car is exceptional and visually appealing.
Neutral: Some comments provide information about the market for the vehicle, discussing its pricing and availability. @Haikuman shares insights about the current market, indicating that many new and used GT4 RS cars are available, with some priced below sticker. They also express a desire to own this model, which reflects interest rather than personal enthusiasm. @Collectibleclassics, the seller, offers information about the dealership's credibility and services, such as inspections and shipping, showcasing a professional approach to sales.
Negative: A few comments express concerns or critiques regarding the car. @acooperk questions whether the vehicle includes a nose lift, while @bzabodyn criticizes it for lacking this option and notes that it seems like a low-option car. @Ken_P expresses suspicion that the car is priced too high, estimating it to be around $65,000 to $70,000 short of its value. The sentiment here suggests some apprehension about the car's specifications and market value, indicating that not everyone is fully convinced about its pricing and features.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors are enthusiastic about the vehicle, particularly praising its aesthetic features. @Powerandart notes the attractive $95 blue paint option, describing it as a nominal cost compared to the overall vehicle price. @CurtisAdrian and @ACRSNK also highlight the beauty of the color and the vehicle's powerful performance capabilities, with @rdot mentioning that it can achieve impressive quarter-mile times with proper upgrades. The comments reflect admiration for the car’s design and its alignment with classic American muscle cars, as discussed by The_Dude_Abides (The Seller), who emphasizes the retro appeal and modern technology that enhance the driving experience.
Neutral: Several user comments reflect community engagement and inquiries about specifics related to the vehicle. @Alnimmob asks about the availability of a stick shift option or if it can be retrofitted, while @f6f inquires about the top recorded speed. @Dtheriault engages in discussions about collector car values and market trends, showing an interest in gauging the car's future sale potential. The_Seller responds to questions, clarifying aspects like the MSO and providing information on the rarity of the specific B5-colored model being sold, which adds contextual value to the auction listing.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism regarding the potential resale value of the Demon 170, with @CDehne and @Dtheriault contending that prices are readjusting to reflect realistic market conditions. The existence of competition from other high-performance vehicles, like the ZR1X, raises concerns about the long-term collectibility of the Demon 170. @2003pilot furthermore comments on the reliability of the displayed top speed, suggesting that it may not be an accurate indicator of performance due to the ability to reset it. Overall, these comments reflect doubt about the stability of the car's value in a fluctuating market.
|
 |
Positive: @JD1975 (The Seller) mentions that the GMC has been a reliable daily driver for the past five years, providing a lot of fun during summer travels across Northern Michigan. @YETIMAN expresses excitement about the truck's impressive specifications, including the big block engine and various robust components, complimenting its stunning build and perfect lift and stance. @BloodyHell and @Discobob also appreciate the build quality, describing it as an all-around awesome truck that's enjoyable and eventful to use, with @Discobob noting the retro appeal that garners compliments.
Neutral: @JD1975 (The Seller) engages with commenters, responding to @YETIMAN's query about the truck's transfer case, clarifying that it has an NP241, which is common for GM trucks from the late 80s. @Valkyrja mentions the possibility of having her daughter test drive the truck, reflecting on the positive reaction from her wife upon viewing it. @BlueOvalsNBowties inquires about the truck's capability to handle a long-distance drive, which @JD1975 confirms as possible, albeit with caution regarding Michigan's salty roads.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: @radcrujones expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, noting it is a "nice looking ride". Additionally, @boaboyoz referred to the car's color, saying the "groovy Guards Red 996.2 cab is totally fab". @danyaal shared excitement about the car, stating plans to retrofit it with LN Engineering, indicating a strong interest in its potential and performance.
Neutral: @azguy238 asked about the activation method for the "Sport Exhaust" system, with @Altongray suggesting that a button should be present if it is a factory option. In response, @danyaal inquired about the IMS bearing replacement, tire age, and the condition of the brakes. @doorjamb2020 posed questions about paint thickness readings, seeking reassurance about the car's condition based on previous repairs and paint work.
Negative: @azguy238 also expressed skepticism about the vehicle's window sticker, indicating it seemed suspicious due to the lack of price shown next to the Sports Exhaust option. @fatcat512 clarified that the XLF exhaust is not valved and thus does not have a button. @CPAinNH raised concerns about the condition of the driver's seat leather, as well as potential imperfections in the soft top, suggesting there could be some issues that need addressing.
|
 |
Positive: @maxtrader complimented the vehicle's color combination, describing it as beautiful, which highlights the overall aesthetic appeal of the car. This appreciation for the visual elements suggests that the vehicle is likely attractive to potential buyers.
Neutral: @maxtrader raised several inquiries regarding the vehicle's history and condition, questioning the discrepancy in the model year reported by CarFax, the absence of accident photos, and the reported damage entries. This reflects a common concern among buyers looking to purchase high-value vehicles, where transparency and clarity in the vehicle's past are paramount.
Negative: Concerns were expressed about the vehicle's servicing record, as @maxtrader noted that no servicing had been documented in the last three years. This lack of maintenance history may lead potential buyers to worry about the car's reliability or any underlying issues that haven't been addressed.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight @QuickStrike's expertise and customer service, praising the ease of the buying process and the reliability of the vehicles offered. @KeiWD mentioned having a positive experience purchasing a Pajero Mini, expecting nothing less from the Acty truck. Additionally, @sjr189 shared a personal testimony about buying from Steve, emphasizing his commitment to providing quality trucks. Furthermore, @jb908 inquired about the AC functionality, to which @QuickStrike confirmed that it works well, showcasing the vehicle's readiness for use.
Neutral: @QuickStrike provided detailed information about the Acty's specifications, explaining the improvements made in the 99+ models compared to earlier versions, such as enhanced safety features, a new transmission, and electronic fuel injection. He also mentioned the antique license plate transfer process for Pennsylvania buyers, allowing for immediate driving upon transfer with his plate. The seller's willingness to transport the vehicle for $2 per mile also appeared to be a service offered to broaden the auction's reach, although the distance and cost of delivery were raised by @ScotwithoneT.
Negative: Some comments expressed dissatisfaction with the vehicle's aesthetic, particularly its color. @ScotwithoneT voiced disappointment over the truck being white, suggesting a different color may have had broader appeal. He humorously noted that his wife's preference could inhibit his purchase. While @QuickStrike defended the choice to maintain the original color, stating it preserves the truck's authenticity, it nonetheless raised discussions about its market appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @Facucrimella appreciates the car and mentions that it looks nice. @P0rsche956 describes it as a great car in its day and a vintage masterpiece, implying that it still holds value. @kwaltz71 (The Seller) provides positive insights into the vehicle's functionality, stating that the heating works great and offering reassuring information about the wheels and sealing of the underside.
Neutral: @kwaltz71 (The Seller) addresses inquiries about the sunroof, noting that it is currently frozen in place but seals well. The seller also acknowledges the wheels as Chrome Smoothies with dome hubcaps and explains how the underside was treated and sealed previously. @wentwoja1234 and @Chrispc engage in a discussion about the vehicle's underside, clarifying that the appearance is typical for an air cooled VW motor.
Negative: @wentwoja1234 raises concerns about potential oil on the underside of the vehicle, suggesting uncertainty about its condition. @rustyrotors questions the peculiar wheels, indicating confusion over their design and how they fit with the overall aesthetics of the car. @joeveto expresses concern about the heater channels, questioning their condition, and the functionality of the heating system.
|
 |
Positive: @AaronCCG remarked that the vehicle is perfect, while @OldEngineer noted it as a nice car and asked about dyno testing. @dmabbott1 described the vehicle as beautiful and appreciates the details about its emissions status. @DDearborn expressed enthusiasm for the car, highlighting the difficulty of finding models with low mileage, and stated excitement about possibly bringing it home. @EASSB commented on its cleanliness, wishing the seller good luck with the sale.
Neutral: @Socal675 (The Seller) provided information on the car's emissions status, confirming it passed smog testing recently with proper modifications and a legal supercharger sticker. They mentioned the car was tuned similarly to an identical build documented on MotorTrend which achieved 450 hp to the wheels. Additional modifications such as the Billy Boat exhaust system and other parts available for sale were discussed, clarifying current configurations and potential noise issues.
Negative: Comments by @dmabbott1 raised concerns about the car's history, asking about previous failed emissions tests on the Carfax and inquiring about tire date codes. @bhjc82 expressed confusion over the smog clause in the description, seeking clarification to ensure it would pass inspection as stated. @deere inquired about front damage recorded on the Carfax, to which @Socal675 (The Seller) explained it was minor damage from a car wash incident.
|
 |
Positive: @Vintagesarasota confirmed that the vehicle has been well maintained, stored in a climate-controlled facility, and runs smoothly with no dash lights illuminated during operation. They emphasize that the gauge lights and all vents are functioning properly, ensuring comfort and usability. The seller also reassured potential buyers that they would confidently drive the car anywhere, reflecting their trust in its reliability.
Neutral: @Vintagesarasota noted that the tires were manufactured between the 29th and 49th week of 2016 and that a hardtop stand is included. They also addressed some concerns about the odometer discrepancy, attributing it to a potential error by the Mass DMV, and stated that the car has had four different previous owners, which they could verify with supporting documentation.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition were raised by commentors such as @73carnut and @Radost, who pointed out issues like the potential misalignment of the hood and the missing factory sticker on the left fender. @DavidATX asked about previous issues with air vent functionality and costs related to repairs, implying there may be unresolved mechanical concerns. The unease around the vehicle’s accident history also lingered, despite @Vintagesarasota's assurances that there had been no damage in the reported areas.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a very favorable view of the 2009 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500, highlighting its low mileage and condition. @Platinummotorspdx, the seller, emphasizes that the vehicle is in perfect condition, akin to how it was when it first left the dealership. Commentors express admiration for the car's beauty and unique features, such as the Limited-Edition Red Stripe Appearance Package, which holds significance among collectors and enthusiasts. @PP0001 provides detailed information about the rarity of the car, underscoring its desirability and the presence of Carroll Shelby's signature, which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: Several comments address the details surrounding the car, such as the fender stripes that were added by the previous owner for Carroll Shelby's signature, differentiating them from factory specifications. @Tobyallen remarks on the practice of Shelby's signatures being sold, which leads to @PP0001 explaining the charitable aspect of Shelby's signature deals, providing context that adds depth to the conversation. The seller remains engaged, answering queries and sharing relevant auction details, including the urgency as the auction is approaching its end.
Negative: There are mixed sentiments regarding the addition of the fender stripes, with @TRD_OKC questioning why they vary on one side of the vehicle. This raises concerns about authenticity and factory standards. Although @Tobyallen does not directly criticize the car, his comment implies skepticism regarding the value of the signature on the vehicle. Nevertheless, the overall tone remains positive, as most comments look past these concerns to appreciate the vehicle's value and condition, focusing on its auction prospects.
|
 |
Positive: @Discobob expressed enthusiasm for the car's color, describing it as 'delicious' and complimented the excellent listing. @2bed also found the car beautiful and offered good luck with the sale, showcasing a positive sentiment for its aesthetic appeal. Additionally, @Youngtimerclassics praised the original owner for their honesty and transparency with the vehicle's condition, indicating that the car has been well-cared for. Similarly, @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 showed respect for the seller's decision to keep the vehicle in such a good state, suggesting that this results in a higher value and recognition of its worth.
Neutral: @Drewogatory, the seller, provided insights into the vehicle's history and current condition, mentioning that it was originally planned to be a long-term car but is now up for sale due to financial reasons. The seller noted that while the vehicle may throw a couple of codes due to its modifications, it is mostly in good shape and mentioned that it did not burn oil while parked. There was also some discussion on the car’s potential for modification and its non-compliance with Californian emissions, an important factor for potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car's emissions compliance, specifically from @TuzlanskoPivo, questioning why it can't pass CA emissions. @RedRay speculated that modifications including an aftermarket exhaust system might be the culprit for the emissions issues, suggesting it may lack necessary sensors. Furthermore, @DoNotReply noted that these cars were typically not designed as daily drivers and often face wear and tear due to modifications, hinting at potential reliability issues that come with prior heavy use.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the Cadillac Blackwing, highlighting its beautiful design and impressive features. @bhoffma1 expressed admiration with a compliment about the car's appearance, while @socialpro1 noted the attractive 'Wave Metallic' paint option. @AZSkye provided a strong endorsement by stating that the Blackwing is superior to competitors like BMW, Mercedes-Benz, or Porsche, emphasizing its speed and comfort. Others, like @maw06, complimented the smart interior design with detailed features like red piping on the seats. Overall, the aesthetic and performance aspects of the Blackwing received high marks from the audience.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged with various aspects of the auction, discussing the current bidding dynamics without a clear stance on the vehicle's value. @EGuyer1521 questioned the rationale behind straight high-level bids when the goal is to create a bidding war, while others like @clemsgn addressed the rarity of the specific car configuration being auctioned. @dparke22 posed inquiries about the warranty details and the vehicle's condition, reflecting a cautious yet interested perspective. @VEEEEEE (The Seller) reiterated warranty specifics and offered transparency about the car’s usage during their ownership.
Negative: Some comments expressed disbelief or concern about the seller's decision to sell a high-performance car that has seen very little use. @GooseGas83 questioned how the car could be left unused for such a long period, suggesting it should be enjoyed rather than sitting idle. Others, such as @GooseGas83 again and @daddydmm, shared sentiments of frustration over a potential bidding strategy that might not reflect the true value of the vehicle. This indicates a perception that the car's current bidding situation might not do justice to its quality and desirability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its rarity and unique appeal. @beakyboy36 noted that the car is pretty rare and appears to have all the options, which adds to its allure. @critterpainter praised the car's beauty and expressed interest in its original powerhouse generator. @OhioSIgnCollector shared historical insights about similar vehicles, emphasizing their scarcity and unique heritage. @Lagrange25 (The Seller) provided detailed responses to inquiries, demonstrating a willingness to clarify the vehicle's condition and specifications, which was appreciated by interested parties.
Neutral: Several participants provided commentary that reflected both curiosity and caution regarding the authenticity of the vehicle. @Maxwell077 raised questions about whether the car was a genuine Town Car or a replica, contributing to an ongoing discussion about the differences between models. @Kevinfonz voiced similar concerns, questioning the evidence behind the car's authenticity while @brstsmith observed discrepancies between the engine number and title. The seller, @Lagrange25, attempted to address these points, indicating that the engine was verified to match the title and adding photos for further transparency.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's authenticity created a tense dialogue. @jwtfjwtf asserted that the car was not a true Town Car, casting doubts on its value and pedigree. @Maxwell077 and others suggested it may have been altered, with @Y-Blockhead describing it as a potential 'tribute' rather than a factory model. Skepticism about its components persisted, with comments on the originality of features such as the engine number and body materials. This atmosphere of doubt intensified with accusations of misinformation, particularly about the true nature of the Town Car model, leading to calls for evidence to support claims regarding the car's history and condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the overall appearance and performance of the vehicle. @drthokie described the GS as a 'great looking' car, while @SpyderMan981 highlighted it as an 'absolute gem' that rides better than BMWs and Porsches. @sclass88 called it 'phenomenal' and regarded it as more reliable than a wood-burning stove, indicating a strong desire for this model. Several individuals, including @rbelloff and @LongDucDong, expressed their admiration for the Lexus brand, with comments noting the high-quality materials and solid feel of the vehicle. @HyeTec acclaimed the undercarriage's condition, suggesting it adds to the vehicle's appeal. The seller, @aegmotorsports, confirmed original elements like the leather seats, further enhancing the car's charm.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in technical discussions about the vehicle, particularly surrounding the engine and maintenance specifics. @mjolner and @PeaceVKeeper clarified that the 2007 GS430 uses a timing belt, with maintenance due around 90k miles. @DukeDog1 inquired about the brake condition, while @3pedal4ever requested additional information on tire dates and engine fluid conditions. Seller responses indicated the car's maintenance practices, with @aegmotorsports noting a timing belt and water pump service soon to be performed, and confirming no fluid leaks were present. The informative exchanges suggest a community of knowledgeable enthusiasts who value detailed accounts of vehicle upkeep.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about common issues associated with the model. @Carlover310 warned about problematic brake actuators and A/C drainage issues in the GS430, suggesting it could lead to costly repairs. @SpyderMan981 concurred, sharing personal experiences of similar issues with his own vehicle. Together, they caution potential buyers about the need for routine maintenance and monitoring of rubber components as the car ages. @mongoose2231 questioned the use of aftermarket parts, advocating for OEM components as more fitting for the Lexus brand. These concerns reflected a tempered atmosphere within some discussions, balancing enthusiastic praise with practical warnings about ownership.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous commenters have praised the craftsmanship and condition of the vehicle, highlighting its meticulous maintenance by @trahanm (The Seller) and the love poured into it over the years. @mcs1162 described it as sensational, noting its perfect power delivery and flawless driving experience. Other enthusiasts like @Kromis and @veedub00 echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the rarity and beauty of the Espada, along with the owner's dedication to preserving its legacy. @JimBot and @ProCoach also contributed to this positive outlook by vouching for the seller's knowledge and integrity, emphasizing that serious buyers can trust their transactions with him.
Neutral: Some comments reflected curiosity about specific features of the Espada, including inquiries about its original color and details about the features such as the steering wheel. @johnak raised questions regarding whether the steering wheel was original to this model, while @rhyno inquired about the original blue color. @trahanm (The Seller) provided insights into the wheel design and color history, emphasizing the uniqueness of the vehicle's features as well as corrections about the factory records. Overall, these discussions contributed to a well-rounded understanding of the vehicle's attributes without veering towards negativity or outright endorsement.
Negative: While the vehicle received much admiration, some commenters focused on the unique faux knock-off wheels, which drew mixed opinions. @jimBot expressed frustration over the fixation on these wheels, suggesting that the concerns were unfounded compared to the overall quality of the car. @johnak mentioned personal preferences regarding the wheels and noted they might detract from the vehicle's appeal. The ongoing debate about its historical authenticity and production details indicated that some potential buyers were uncertain, but @trahanm (The Seller) continuously positioned these elements as part of the car's rich history, striving to quell dissatisfaction by emphasizing the vehicle's overall excellence.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express a strong appreciation for the Honda Element, particularly its rarity and unique features. @DatsunZGuy humorously refers to the seller as the 'Element Whisperer,' indicating a fondness for the brand and its community. @blue44 notes the car's overall good condition for its age and suggests that it can be further improved with minor repairs. Other owners, like @MWar, share fond memories of their Elements, praising their reliability and practicality, suggesting that low-mileage examples like this one are highly sought after and valuable.
Neutral: The seller, @rmwcali, promotes the vehicle as a well-maintained 2007 Honda Element with a clean Carfax and a solid service history, asserting it has only had two previous owners and highlighting its low mileage. Various commenters facilitate discussions about specific aspects of the vehicle, such as a recall regarding the trailer hitch harness and concerns regarding the smog check status for potential California buyers. Additionally, several commenters request specific photos to clarify the condition of various parts of the car, which the seller agrees to provide, showing a commitment to transparency.
Negative: Some potential buyers express concerns about the vehicle, particularly regarding the smog check and the absence of pre-sale inspection typically expected from sellers. @jdmguru24 explicitly asks why the seller isn't smogging the vehicle before sale, suggesting this could lead to buyer hesitation. Furthermore, comments about the car's age reveal doubts about its overall reliability and performance, with some suggesting that older vehicles may have inherent issues that could arise. Comments like these reflect a cautious attitude from certain individuals toward purchasing such a used vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described as a very nice example and one of the favorite models for many commenters. @Gman7501 appreciates its reliability when properly maintained and believes it can last a long time, expressing a good level of trust in the car's overall quality. Furthermore, it has detailed maintenance records, which @Cireisa considers an excellent indication of the car's condition, despite some minor issues with the headliner and rear shocks that shouldn't impact performance in the near future.
Neutral: Several commenters have questions regarding specific features of the vehicle. @nikil inquires about the functionality of the Continental head unit, wanting to clarify if it serves as a CD-player or CD-changer and how it works with the existing radio. Other questions revolve around the air conditioning and locking mechanisms, such as @Miniotis2 asking about vacuum actuated door locks. @DENISMB, the seller, provides a clear answer regarding the Continental radio's capabilities for music streaming and phone usage, indicating a modern feature in the vehicle.
Negative: There are some critiques regarding the vehicle's features, particularly concerning heated seats. @Craigger expresses dissatisfaction that this model offers no heated seats, even noting it as a potential dealbreaker. @E_F_III confirms that heated seats were typically reserved for AMG models, and @Gman7501 adds that they were available in other configurations but needed to be ordered. Additionally, @Cireisa points out physical imperfections like the sagging headliner and rusted bolts, indicating that although these may not cause immediate issues, they detract from the car's overall presentation.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive design and performance features. @Abagroupemif stated they love the car, particularly its striking black color, while @FogCity1959 complimented the car's gorgeous aesthetics, comparing it favorably to a classic 1958 Corvette. Additionally, @dj_walls2424 praised the impressive video production showing the vehicle, noting the high-quality shots and minimal wind noise. The build quality and unique paint job have also caught the attention of several users, with @Trust-in-the-Machine mentioning that the color choices modernize its appearance and make it stand out among other classic cars.
Neutral: The seller, @MikeGolf83, provided detailed information regarding the car's specifications and maintenance, such as the power output of 430hp at the wheels and 415lbs of torque which he confirmed was a Gen 1 Coyote engine. He noted that while there are no power steering or brakes, handling is solid due to the vehicle's light weight and effective brakes. There were inquiries about various features like tire details, gauge types, and potential modifications such as changing the steering wheel or gauges. Furthermore, @GeminiKoi sought clarification on the installation of sound deadening systems, and @jory1515 inquired about the driver's seat movement.
Negative: Some comments expressed preferences for design elements that could enhance the vehicle's aesthetic. For instance, @Tobyallen criticized the trend of dark rims, suggesting that lighter wheels might complement the look better. Additionally, concerns about the age and remaining life of the tires were raised by @GeminiKoi, who pointed out that they may soon need replacement. The fixed position of the driver's seat was also raised as a potential issue by @jory1515, who was curious if adjustment would be possible, reflecting a common need for customization in sports cars. Overall, despite the generally positive sentiment, there were practical concerns related to the vehicle's usability and visual appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its fun and thrilling nature. @EviLBlacK describes it as ‘a fun rip’ and suggests it has a Batman-inspired aesthetic. @a1harix notes that the vehicle genuinely represents Bring a Trailer’s ethos, while @BloodDragon humorously acknowledges the unusual paint measurements, expressing temptation if it can really become road-legal for a reasonable cost. Overall, commenters appreciate its distinctiveness and the excitement it brings to ownership.
Neutral: Several individuals engage in practical discussions regarding the costs associated with owning and maintaining the vehicle. @LLHVAC estimates running costs at about $20k per weekend while referencing structural requirements for street legality. @Brav (The Seller) provides details on potential expenses including tire costs and track support, while @carguychase inquires about the specifics of track support. This indicates a shared interest in understanding both ownership logistics and financial considerations surrounding the vehicle.
Negative: Despite the vehicle's appeal, some comments highlight notable downsides. @LLHVAC mentions the difficulties of making the car street legal, pointing out its impractical features such as lacking air conditioning and being uncomfortable for daily driving, which @carguychase echoes. Additionally, @LLHVAC recounts the costly challenges associated with repairs and maintenance, including expensive gearbox issues and the overall burden of keeping it operation-ready, signifying that while the car is stunning, it demands extensive commitment and financial resources.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praise the vehicle's excellent condition and maintenance history. For instance, @Craven mentions the car is 'Boxy, but Good,' appreciating its classic design. @RoundHeadlights highlights the appealing background story of single ownership and recommends making clear that the car includes a 4-speed with overdrive. Commenters like @Sjalabais view it as a rare, well-kept manual 240, describing it as a potential steal for someone looking for a vintage Volvo. Additionally, the seller, @testdummypilot, reassures potential buyers about the car’s maintenance and transparency during the transaction, asserting confidence in the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: The comments reveal some curiosity regarding the car's history and condition specifics. @Dhoga and @Impalas_Trailblazas both inquire about the reported damage from a 2021 incident, indicating a concern for safety for future drivers of the car. Meanwhile, @mXs3000 questions the state of the paint, citing confusion over paint thickness indicators while acknowledging that it looks great. There is also a discussion among users about Volvo's assembly locations, with @shervinator and @Old_Ned sharing insights about the vehicle's manufacturing history, showcasing an interest in its origins without strong opinions either way about its condition.
Negative: There are a few negative undertones related to certain aspects of the car, particularly regarding the absence of air conditioning, which @genous points out, confirming its lack in the details provided. @DBinOH expresses disbelief over how the minor accident reporting appeared on Carfax, suggesting that the vintage vehicle should typically have minimal reported damage. @dbartley raises concerns about the front seat headrests, noting some likely damage, while @mxs3000 expresses a desire for a driving video, underscoring the challenges of buying a vehicle without a personal inspection, reflecting uncertainty about the car's operational state.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle's appearance and performance. @Uberpower remarked that the Iridium silver color is the most beautiful offered by Mercedes-Benz, while @DDearborn expressed admiration for the car, stating it has been flawless during their ownership and highlighting its power and exhaust. Additionally, @Rocketman63 noted the vehicle is in beautiful condition with very low miles, and @gscharnagl described it as a beauty with a fantastic color combination.
Neutral: Several comments sought further information about the vehicle. @genevamotorcars (The Seller) provided useful details, confirming that the SUV has a keyless go button and addressing questions about the AC compressor replacement, stating it seemed to be an OEM part. @Nachtsturm and @SMB037 inquired about the heated steering wheel feature, which the seller clarified was not available on this model, while @gscharnagl asked about the driver's seat condition and the possibility of restoration, to which the seller responded positively about available services.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding potential issues with the vehicle's maintenance history. @Limitedtime shared their experience with a major repair related to the exhaust valve assembly on a similar model, expressing regret for not being aware of this common issue prior to their purchase. Despite that, the seller reassured that the specific vehicle in question showed no signs of related problems, suggesting they can offer extended warranties to cover potential concerns.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received several complimentary remarks from users, highlighting its excellent condition and performance. @Gmmuscleusa notes it's a very nice truck with a color-matched front end that adds to its aesthetic appeal. Additionally, @TheAutobarnStables shares that they bought the truck with their father as a shop vehicle and invested around 6k in a stereo and new tires, confirming it's a reliable vehicle that won't leave one stranded. @AutobarnCollection mentions their personal experience driving the truck, noting it runs great and starts quickly, even in cold conditions, which adds to its desirability.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's specifications reveal a few clarifications and technical discussions. @jtc1227 accurately points out that the truck is actually a Quad Cab and not a Club Cab, prompting @AutobarnCollection to thank them for the correction. There are inquiries about the engine block type with users like @dlc_amp asking for confirmation on whether it has a 53 block, while @TYoung59 offers personal insights about their own truck's block for comparison. @Cmara questions the drivetrain, seeking clarity on whether it's all-wheel drive or rear-wheel drive, to which @AutobarnCollection confirms it's rear drive.
Negative: Some users expressed concerns about details that might impact the vehicle's appeal to potential buyers. @TYoung59 questioned the lack of window and door lock switches on the passenger door, hinting at possible oversights in the vehicle's features. Additionally, there was some confusion about the engine block type, with users like @dlc_amp feeling uncertain and suspecting that the uncertainty regarding the block identification might imply hesitance to disclose potential issues. This led to a need for further verification from @AutobarnCollection, which may affect buyer confidence.
|
Original-Owner 1993 Dodge Power Ram W250 Club Cab Cummins 4×4
3B7KM23C8PM172685
Lot 227823
Private Party
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered praise for its durability and overall performance. @acett shared their positive experience with a similar model, stating it runs great despite high mileage. @Mikel9711 (The Seller) assures potential buyers that the truck has been meticulously maintained over the years, acknowledging its rugged reliability and ability to haul with ease. Buyers express interest, with @njarrett describing it as an awesome truck, reiterating the seller's commitment to providing thorough information about the vehicle's features, such as the functionality of the 4×4 and other accessories.
Neutral: Several comments focus on technical inquiries about the truck's components and maintenance history. @Eric_E. raised concerns about the tie rod design, providing insight from years of experience with similar vehicles. There is curiosity about the specific alignment of the bed and cab, with questions from @BillyBob61 and @RidgeBarrett showing a keen interest in the truck's condition. @GClife inquired about the seller's rules for the pickup process, further emphasizing an interest in logistics and the transaction details rather than just the vehicle's features.
Negative: However, the vehicle's condition has sparked concerns among potential buyers. Comments from @Bartbiltt and @GClife question the roof’s rhino lining and potential underlying issues like rust or bodywork discrepancies, indicating a lack of transparency from the seller on these topics. @W25097 highlighted worries about a possible tear in the steering box mount on the frame, suggesting mechanical concerns that could deter buyers. There is a palpable sense of skepticism regarding the seller's answers, as some feel that issues raised about the bed misalignment and other body work have not been adequately addressed during the auction.
|
 |
Positive: @WAGONBOYTD described the vehicle as a "nice clean subtle example" with appealing galvi trim, noting it has potential for an A/C installation. @Herringbone praised the craftsmanship of the rebuild, highlighting the significant workmanship that went into the vehicle. @steve575 commended the design specification, appreciating the minimalistic options that maintain a vintage look, while @mirra complimented the color and build details, noting a performance upgrade in the engine.
Neutral: @Eastman1, the seller, shared that this vehicle represents a two-year collaboration with the team at TATC in England, showcasing a restrained restoration approach. The seller also provided insights into the vehicle's specifications and feature choices, addressing concerns and queries from potential buyers. They mentioned the installation cost for A/C, linked their website for additional visual references, and answered mechanical queries about the build.
Negative: @mcgregor55 expressed concern about the climate in Florida, hinting at potential challenges of owning the vehicle in such heat and humidity. @jgranberry inquired about the A/C installation costs, reflecting a desire for comfort features that some may find lacking in this build. Additionally, @ls7heaven's question about manual steering and brakes suggests that not all potential buyers might be comfortable with the vintage design choices that come with this restoration.
|
 |
Positive: @Umc2101 has created excitement around the sale of the rare 2012 E350 Van, emphasizing its pristine condition with no rust, as it is sourced from the south. The seller has actively engaged with potential buyers, encouraging them to ask questions, which reflects a commitment to customer service during the auction process. Another buyer, @Chocook, found the explanation for using Copart as the clearing house reasonable, indicating confidence in the seller's professional approach.
Neutral: @Umc2101 addressed the inquiries about the vehicle’s minor damage, clarifying the reports on Carfax regarding the front bumper and assuring buyers that there was no noticeable damage during their inspection. @3rdbaseman raised concerns about previous auction findings, specifically mentioning lower fender and roof damage, to which the seller promptly responded, assuring that the van was repaired adequately. Overall, there seems to be satisfactory communication between the seller and potential buyers regarding the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Some comments indicate skepticism about the vehicle's past, particularly @3rdbaseman mentioning seeing previous auction notes about lower fender and roof damage. Additionally, @MakeMeOink questioned the nature of the minor damage, suggesting that buyers are cautious and looking for transparency regarding any damage history. The inquiry about the absence of cruise control from @Barchettamax also reflects potential dissatisfaction about lacking features that were initially presumed to be present.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments from @vfnrcc (The Seller) emphasize the excellent condition of the Volvo S80, indicating it came as a trade-in from a new Volvo and was very well maintained. @vfnrcc reassures potential buyers that the vehicle is nicely equipped with popular luxury features, including functioning air conditioning. Additionally, @vfnrcc acknowledges concerns about a missing wheel bolt and clarifies that it was addressed with a replacement that was torqued to factory specifications, which indicates that they are attentive to the vehicle's maintenance.
Neutral: Commenters are curious about the vehicle's specifications, particularly regarding air conditioning and the performance of the engine. @genous and @PolarFBear sought clarifications about the air conditioning system and if there was a turbocharger option in this model. Furthermore, @mo_go and @PaulPerez noted possible electrical issues relating to battery replacements, hinting at a pattern of battery maintenance without implying immediate concern about the vehicle's reliability.
Negative: Multiple commenters expressed concern about the wheel bolt and inquired about potential underlying issues, with @BigDaddyEureka questioning why the bolt was missing and making various hypotheses regarding the dealer's practices. @Alienviking raised alarms about the frequency of battery replacements as documented in the Carfax report, prompting questions regarding why the battery consumption was high. Additionally, @turleymarshall pointed out a potential fluid leak suggested by an oil mark, further complicating the perception of the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz appreciates the stylish design of the Star Chief, calling it a sweet build and expressing good luck wishes for the sale. @JohnF1966 admires the rarity, noting he has never seen such a car in person and believes its striking colors will make it popular at cruise nights. @Dollycat3 points out the stunning and rare convertible coupe aspect of the vehicle, highlighting its appeal within the classic car community.
Neutral: @JKO64 (The Seller) provides key details, such as the overall length of the vehicle at 18 feet and that the tires are from 2015. Additionally, the longest trip recorded in the vehicle was a significant 1200-mile journey from Green River, WY to Dallas, TX. @Uby67vw1958 and others mention the transmission confusion, with @Uby67vw1958 assuming there might be a typo in the listing regarding its specifications, while @JKO64 addresses the transmission as a 4-speed Hydra-Matic.
Negative: Concerns are raised by @Pfeil about the assessment of the vehicle's condition, suggesting that a lift would be necessary to inspect it thoroughly. @Uby67vw1958 questions the listing's transmission description, hinting that it may not be accurate as per the original factory standards. Overall, while the vehicle has received admiration for its style and rare qualities, there are lingering questions regarding its mechanical details and condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the vehicle, with some referring to it as a 'beautiful example' and 'timeless beauty.' @KentuckyEd and @MNberg highlight its desirability and unique character as a British classic sports car. The positive impressions are reinforced by its good condition and the quality of the restoration work, as noted by @kylejcooper (The Seller) when he mentions meticulous attention to detail during restoration. Commenters like @AHcarnut express their admiration for the car's finish and the craftsmanship involved, with specific praise for the well-fitted interior.
Neutral: Some comments focus on technical specifics and clarifications, such as @KWM3748's inquiry about wheel fitment and @Miketoy's observation regarding the discrepancy of seat piping color. @Thistle7's questions about the car's original color and repaint history reflect a neutral curiosity regarding the vehicle's background. Several users, including @Fastlotus and @Volmike, suggest that a driving video would enhance the listing, but understand the logistical challenges posed by current weather conditions. These inquiries indicate a blend of interest with a desire for more information.
Negative: A few commenters raise concerns or express confusion about certain aspects of the vehicle, such as @WHA22 questioning potential rust and @AHcarnut mentioning the VIN tag issue. @MNberg suggests that the seller could enhance the listing by being more communicative and providing detailed information, hinting that a lack of seller engagement might leave money on the table. Additionally, @kodpkd jokes about the steering wheel potentially being mounted upside down, which adds a light-hearted but critical remark about the restoration. Overall, while negative comments are minimal, they underscore a desire for clarity and assurance regarding the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received some positive comments regarding its overall appearance and condition. @hurricane39 noted the attractive clean look of the Cayenne S, particularly praising the well-done headrest screens. @Bigleo mentioned that the car appears to be a great deal, expressing eagerness to consider purchasing it. The seller, @AAAMOTORCARS, showcases confidence in their vehicle's quality by emphasizing their rigorous inspection process, indicating they have sold over 85 vehicles without complaint and that the car has been smog certified and safety checked.
Neutral: Some comments reflect a neutral stance, primarily focusing on information requests and confirmations. @hurricane39 raised specific inquiries about historical issues with the V8 engine, asking for confirmation about various potential maintenance history points such as the coolant pipes and transmission issues. @Malibu955 suggested a trustworthy location for inspection and expressed the importance of verifying certain repairs for the car's value. @Dinodino also reached out for assurance about the vehicle's smog certification, to which @AAAMOTORCARS promptly responded with an affirmative.
Negative: On the negative side, there were concerns raised about potential issues with the vehicle. @Dinodino questioned a large puddle observed underneath the car but received a reply from @AAAMOTORCARS denying any leaks, asserting that what was seen was likely water from the air conditioning unit. Despite the seller's reassurance, the mention of puddles could raise doubts for potential buyers about the car's condition. @Malibu955's comments also underscored critical repair aspects that should be confirmed before considering the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @Lesiwolf200 finds the vehicle visually appealing, stating it looks good. @Arinepon loves the color and mentions the body appears to be in great shape, reminiscing about their fond experience with a previous model. @Gabriel0222 expresses strong admiration by calling it their dream car, while @Blizzard340 describes the car as reliable and fun, although they note it may not be very affordable nowadays. @Rajunz highlights the nostalgia the car invokes, as it brings back great memories, and @JohnEB refers to the vehicle as a "Time Machine," sharing an anecdote about a test drive in the early '90s. @bemrfst appreciates the overall aesthetic of the car and admires the condition it's in. @McFood echoes this sentiment, noting the vehicle looks great despite the common history of these models not lasting long due to how they were typically driven.
Neutral: @Arinepon asks if a video of the convertible top operation and more detailed photos could be made available, showing interest but also a desire for more information. Additionally, @4warned provides clarification about the wire in the photo by suggesting it is likely for a trickle battery charger, continuing the conversation about the vehicle's features. @dmuth153 (The Seller) confirms @4warned's assumption regarding the red wire and promises to upload a video showcasing the top's functionality later, reflecting a proactive approach to addressing inquiries.
Negative: @Blizzard340 mentions that while the vehicle is fun, it may no longer be super affordable, suggesting concerns about its price point in the current market. Additionally, @Mandyfoor expresses disappointment after realizing the car was sold, indicating potential buyer regret and a sense of loss in missing out on the opportunity. This sentiment points to the competitive nature of the market for such desirable vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @QQTO (The Seller) highlighted the custom re-upholstery of the interior, creating a stunning color contrast that enhances the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and gives it a fresh, new feel. The seller also mentioned that the vehicle comes with a complete set of three keys, including two master keys and one rarely used valet key, which adds convenience for potential buyers. Additionally, @QQTO addressed concerns about the subwoofer and clarified that any buzzing is a common issue that could be easily fixed, emphasizing the desire to maintain the car's original state while providing transparency about its condition.
Neutral: Some comments raised questions about the vehicle's interior quality and the state of the subwoofer. @matt.luber inquired specifically about whether the subwoofer was functional and if there was any buzzing. @DaMCrux also noted the quality and sought further private communication. Additionally, queries regarding the airbag light and the alignment of the driver's door were noted, with @QQTO responding that these issues were common and manageable. The clarification about the door misalignment being due to a worn door lock actuator rather than structural problems helped address any buyer concerns.
Negative: @Hyybriid expressed discomfort with the vehicle's cover photo placement, suggesting it gave an unsettling impression, while @falcon6037 raised questions regarding the misalignment of the driver's door and the reason for the interior redo. @2mAn's request for additional photos of the trunk spot welds indicated a need for more detail, which suggests some buyers may have lingering concerns about the vehicle's overall condition. Meanwhile, @RevSome's comment about the bidding situation implies a sense of confusion or frustration regarding the sale process.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the overall condition and beauty of the Lexus LS400, highlighting its clean, rust-free status and low mileage. @DermGuy2022 expressed nostalgia and affection for the model, reflecting that it was well-loved by previous owners. @Carlover310 commended the cleanliness and originality of the vehicle, pointing out that the leather and paint condition indicate it was likely a 'garage queen.' Others, such as @iTod, noted their excitement about the auction, suggesting the vehicle may perform well given its appealing features and comments from the seller, who provided confidence in the car's quality and had positive remarks about their offerings in the past.
Neutral: Several comments centered around inquiries about specific mechanical details and the vehicle's history. @TheADM requested confirmation about the California emissions compliance and matching license plates, to which the seller, @PM_Terra, replied affirmatively. @goshi expressed curiosity about the car's maintenance history and any upcoming needs it may require based on its lack of recent work done. This theme continued, with @Whiskey_Chaser and @gwarcuri asking about the timing belt and the current functionality of the climate control, suggesting that prospective buyers are being thorough and careful in their evaluations.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some commenters regarding potential mechanical issues. @goshi specifically asked about the condition of motor mounts and the power steering pump, hinting at worries about reliability and maintenance costs. Additionally, @raykosh and @gwarcuri mentioned various maintenance tasks that may be necessary over time, including a complete inspection of components such as belts and fluids which could lead to significant expense. The mention of the car's age and the importance of proper upkeep inferred a cautionary note among potential buyers, drawing attention to the importance of proactive care in maintaining older vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, with @Singerirv calling it pretty, and @Dollycat3 describing it as absolutely gorgeous with exceptional Opalescent Golden Sand over black leather. @DetailDave highlighted it as the epitome of the series one E coupe, and @dmo94556 referred to it as a gorgeous, well-cared-for example. Furthermore, the seller, @Sierra_Classic_Sportscar, provided enthusiasm for the car, emphasizing it is a stunning example and detailing its notable history and past ownership. The general sentiment is one of appreciation for the car's beauty and craftsmanship, and the comments indicate excitement for its auction.
Neutral: The seller, @Sierra_Classic_Sportscar, provided detailed information regarding the car's operational status, including the history, ownership, and mechanical condition. They explained the planned non-operation status and addressed inquiries about oil pressure and any concerns regarding tire age. Several users inquired about specific characteristics of the car, such as bumper adjustments and the availability of a spare wheel, which @Sierra_Classic_Sportscar confirmed. The ongoing conversation revealed a collaborative effort between potential buyers and the seller to clarify details about the car, underscoring active engagement in the auction process.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's paint color, with commenters like @John_B and @davidxk questioning whether the Opalescent Golden Sand appeared too dark or brownish in photos. Additionally, @Drumond pointed out a potential issue with oil pressure during the driving video, to which the seller provided an explanation regarding the gauge's function but acknowledged past issues. @Maverick99 and others noted paint flaws and inquired about the presence of rust or the original condition of certain parts, indicating some apprehension about the car's integrity. These remarks reflect a desire for full transparency from the seller regarding any existing issues with the vehicle.
|
Original-Owner 1994 Ford F-250 HD XLT SuperCab Power Stroke 5-Speed
1FTHX25F8RKB41245
Lot 227944
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, with @aus92 describing it as a "Beauty!" and @CSmith1142 praising it as a "Beautiful rig!!" Additionally, @UncleBaldy commended the comprehensive presentation of the truck and wished the seller good luck with the sale (GLWTA). The seller has also actively engaged with the community, responding to questions and thanking commenters for their compliments, reinforcing a positive interaction around the vehicle's presentation.
Neutral: Several questions regarding the vehicle's features and specifications have been raised by various commenters. @gullylurk inquired about the functionality of the fuel tank switch, to which the seller confirmed that it works great. @KulJT sought clarification on the engine badge, indicating a potential discrepancy between the truck's badging and its engine type, which the seller addressed by explaining the transitional nature of the 1994 model. Questions about shipping costs from @nick617 and the location of a broken grommet from @sernow were also posed, with the seller providing informative responses to each.
Negative: Some concerns were voiced by commenters, particularly regarding the vehicle's condition. @sernow initially expressed confusion about the broken plastic grommet and its impact on the door's functionality. However, the seller clarified that while the door does latch, it may not do so as readily without the grommet. There was also a suggestion from @cwsteel for a cold start video, humorously noting the extremely low temperatures, although the seller accepted the challenge to upload it, indicating some hesitation about the cold starting conditions.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the overall appeal of the vehicle, particularly its minimal surface rust and original paint as noted by @ImTheDoctor, who appreciates the vehicle's condition. @OldDog reminisces about the CJ-5 model, sharing a personal connection by mentioning that he has owned two in the past, emphasizing the model's classic nature. @rip1166 appreciates the vehicle's features, considering it a nice original Jeep and mentioning a specific hard-to-find accessory, which further underscores its desirability.
Neutral: There are practical inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifications and visual documentation. For instance, @CDehne asks if the winch was intended for boat retrieval and not the Jeep itself. @shannamerica questions the presence of power steering, while @ImTheDoctor requests various images, including the rear tub and a driving video, to ensure the vehicle's condition and roadworthiness. @Slicem investigates specific features such as the absence of a tailgate and reflects on a past Jeep he owned, which suggests a thoughtful consideration of the vehicle.
Negative: Some concerns and inquiries highlight uncertainty about the vehicle’s history and condition. @ImTheDoctor queries about potential cancer on the tub and any body work, suggesting a cautious approach to the purchase. @jgiles22 raises questions about modifications, specifically asking about drilled holes from a non-original tire carrier. Additionally, @rip1166 requests pictures of the floorboards beneath the carpet, hinting at a desire to ensure there are no hidden issues that could affect the vehicle's integrity.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the 1988 BMW 735i, highlighting its rarity and uniqueness as a manual transmission vehicle. @BigD36ford described it as 'super, super rare,' while @lloyddon1 (The Seller) emphasized the vehicle's excellent condition, rarity, and the opportunity to bid with confidence at no reserve. Other users, like @LazyLightning, reminisced positively about their own past experiences with similar models, stating that the manual transmission paired with the big six engine creates a fantastic driving experience. Overall, the sentiments conveyed a strong appreciation for the car's heritage and appeal.
Neutral: Comments covered various inquiries about the vehicle's condition and service history, suggesting a mixture of interest and caution among potential bidders. @corradog60 and @BlackBeard raised questions about the ride quality and discrepancies in mileage reports, indicating a level of scrutiny typical among classic car enthusiasts. @lloyddon1 (The Seller) responded to these inquiries with assurances about the car's condition and history, illustrating a diligent effort to provide details and maintain transparency during the auction process. Some users even requested additional photos and videos before making their bidding decisions, reaffirming their desire for more information before committing.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding the car's condition, particularly the potential for rust and the accuracy of the mileage information. Commenters like @CorradoG60 and @decarb4lyfe pointed out signs of rust and scratched surfaces, encouraging the seller to provide close-up images for potential buyers to assess. @dallasboc noted an issue with the trunk's model badge placement, prompting questions about possible resprays that could affect the car's value. Additionally, @emille4 raised concerns about electrical issues based on previous ownership experiences, contributing to an overall sense of caution surrounding the vehicle's long-term reliability despite its otherwise attractive features.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed great appreciation for the vehicle's features and design, highlighting its luxurious appeal and performance. @HPLM praised the A7 as his favorite car, noting its styling, space, and impressive all-wheel drive performance. @aegmotorsports also provided detailed information about the car's specifications and features, including its powerful 3.0L supercharged V6 engine and an extensive list of luxury amenities, further enhancing its appeal in the auction.
Neutral: Several questions were addressed about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @Wisconsindayton inquired about dents in the back seats, while @RichDD sought clarification regarding an engine issue that was reported at a relatively low mileage. @aegmotorsports provided thorough responses, explaining the repairs conducted after the engine light incident and the decision to replace the headliner, indicating that the vehicle has been well cared for and serviced.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about potential issues with the vehicle. @RichDD specifically asked about the major engine issue, which @aegmotorsports explained was due to a failed plastic guide but assured that the engine had been thoroughly repaired. Additionally, there was a mention of the headliner showing signs of wear, which @aegmotorsports acknowledged as a concern for future maintenance. These concerns may influence some bidders' perception of the vehicle's reliability moving forward.
|
 |
Positive: @spess mentioned that the vehicle is a dynamite looking truck and praised it as the best Land Rover made, suggesting a strong aesthetic appeal and positive sentiment towards its design. @JChrisImpla noted the vehicle's condition, highlighting the absence of scuffs on the wheels and the fact that it comes with two keys, which some might find unusual but adds to the vehicle's value. @bmw_driveit pointed out that the third row seat belts can be seen in the photos provided, addressing a potential concern of @skip1515 with evidence, which adds transparency to the vehicle's listing.
Neutral: @Visotsky inquired about the crossover being replaced, showing a proactive approach to confirming vehicle maintenance history. @Venkersteell raised questions regarding the towing capacity and presence of trailer light connections, demonstrating a typical buyer's curiosity about the vehicle's specifications and its use for towing. @steveb8699 asked about the height with the roof rack and whether it is removable, which reflects a buyer’s interest in practicality and potential accessory modifications.
Negative: @wwickes suggested that questions about the coolant lines should be included in listings for LR4s on auction sites like Bring a Trailer, indicating an industry need for better communication of maintenance history. @jrudolph94 expressed concern about the timing chain, which is a known issue for some vehicles, and while @Collectibleclassics assured that this vehicle has no timing concerns, the question underscores potential buyer anxiety regarding common mechanical issues. @430NYC asked whether the coolant lines had been replaced, highlighting that some buyers are cautious about possible service lapses that could affect vehicle reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @Longbeoden noted that the car is nice looking and very clean, while @lyorkell (The Seller) expressed pride in the vehicle's condition and its history, highlighting that it drove well and was enjoyable at car shows. @SlowNRusty mentioned that despite being from the rust belt, the car was surprisingly in very good condition thanks to its care over the years, and @lyorkell added details about its original ownership and features, which sparked nostalgia and conversation about classic cars.
Neutral: @mrpotty expressed curiosity about the vehicle's ability to withstand a trip to Colorado, asking about the functionality of the heat and AC. @lyorkell reassured him that the car was indeed in great shape and the heat worked well, also suggesting it should be shipped rather than driven due to its limited use. Additionally, @lyorkell provided updates including new photos and clarified questions regarding light indicators in response to @twilhite62.
Negative: @twilhite62 raised a concern about the engine light being on, suggesting a scan was needed, but @lyorkell quickly addressed this by explaining that the light was not an issue as it was due to the ignition being turned on. There was also a question from @LukeH61101 about the car being buried in snow, indicating some concerns about its current condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, particularly its color, with @nexusautobrokers noting that they love this color. @60Junkie reminisced about their own 2006 version, expressing regret over selling it and stating they loved everything about it. @Bnrio17 described the truck as beautiful and conveyed good luck with the auction. @IWishIHadMoreVolvos echoed the positive sentiment, claiming it might fetch up to $30k easily. Other commenters like @sansari925 and @gwilste also appreciated the specs and noted that the vehicle is an ideal driver’s model, emphasizing its accident-free history and low mileage, which they believe adds to its appeal.
Neutral: Some commentators raised questions about the vehicle's service history and maintenance records. @DanielGallagher inquired about the timing belt and water pump replacements, while @2jpkelly asked for clarification on various services recorded in Carfax. The seller, @Mcfly1985, responded to several concerns, mentioning that the timing belt service is due in 2027 and offering to perform the service for the winning bidder. Despite the concerns, several users acknowledged the strong service history of the vehicle, indicating a mix of trust and need for further clarification.
Negative: There were notable criticisms regarding the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @illLegit highlighted concerns about potential body repair, questioning whether layers of body filler were used and requesting further photos. @MasterMarine pointed out historical records of transmission leaks that were declined for repair, stressing the need for transparency on these issues. @Dontbeasnob defended the seller but also cautioned about the many questions raised, while @2jpkelly emphasized the need for assurance that no deferred maintenance exists. Overall, while many appreciated the vehicle, the comments reflected a considerable level of scrutiny regarding its service history.
|
 |
Positive: @garettoli expressed a fondness for the vehicle, recalling their positive experience with a similar model in high school and noting how clean this one looks. @cordes also appreciated the vehicle, giving it an A+ rating for the Shelby wheel. @BeastRig referred to it as a "Beast of a rig," indicating a strong enthusiasm for its performance and design.
Neutral: @alpine60 (The Seller) provided a detailed account of the vehicle's history, sharing that the engine was rebuilt by a local shop and has approximately 8,000 miles since the overhaul. The seller also mentioned adding more photos showcasing the engine's specifications and various spare parts accumulated over 29 years. They indicated that while they love the truck, they are ready to pass it on to a new owner, reflecting an emotional but practical decision.
Negative: @BradleyReed88 raised concerns about the vehicle's maintenance history, noting the presence of a repair order for an engine rebuild followed by another order to replace the engine shortly afterward. This comment reflects a potential issue that may detract from the vehicle's reliability in the eyes of prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the truck, noting its appeal and potential. @SullivanAutoHouse shared that the truck has some Hollywood history, and they enjoyed having it around the shop. @OKSnake08 highlighted its vintage charm and possible project potential, mentioning that it would be a great start for someone, especially with features like the supercab. @MooshiPirpy14 reflected fondly on their family’s similar truck, praising its durability and reliability, suggesting that this truck could also provide great service.
Neutral: There was an informative dialogue about the truck's engine and specifications, with several users seeking clarification on details. @Pitcrw6 initiated discussion about the engine model, leading @SullivanAutoHouse to confirm the VIN indicates a 390 V8, while @ViperGTS41 provided technical insights into the engine's characteristics. @WIZZZZ inquired about the truck's mileage, rear gear, and suspension condition, and @Dhturk responded with factual data from the truck's data plate, facilitating a collaborative exchange of information concerning the vehicle's features.
Negative: The discussion included some concerns and requests for further information, particularly regarding the truck's condition. @gmagno mentioned that the truck's air conditioning system appeared to be incomplete, which could deter some potential buyers. Additionally, @WIZZZZ's inquiries about possible leaks and driving stability indicated apprehensions about the truck's overall performance. Although no major criticisms were directed at the seller, these concerns could impact buyers' perceptions and willingness to bid.
|
 |
Positive: @Mike1964 remarked positively about the vehicle, noting his past experience with a similar model that held up well until an accident. He highlighted that it required only routine maintenance, indicating the reliability of these cars. @Atom0096 also praised the vehicle, mentioning its beautiful low mileage and expressed affection for the Lexus RX350 as his wife loves their own. @Celuey expressed agreement about the car's performance, emphasizing its smooth drive and power, while acknowledging previous issues with dashboards in older models.
@amotorsports (The Seller) further confirmed the vehicle's good condition, stating it needed nothing and was well-kept. They mentioned that the vehicle had a non-smoker's interior and confirmed that the problematic dashboard would be replaced before delivery, alleviating concerns raised by potential buyers regarding the dashboard issues previously seen in older Lexus models. The nicely maintained paint and overall presentation were also noted, ensuring prospective buyers about the quality of the car.
On the other hand, some comments raised critical questions. @DanielGallagher inquired about the vehicle's ownership between two states, while @mbclassicguy commented on the limited service records and the known issue of oil leaks from the VVT-i oil line, asking if any repairs were made. @nick778 requested additional photos to inspect for potential oil leaks, hinting at buyers' concerns over the car's maintenance history, and @KZW questioned the mix of tire brands, indicating a worry about uniformity in the vehicle's performance.
Neutral:
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: @Dgschofield (The Seller) describes the 2008 Mazda Miata MX-5 as a well-maintained and enjoyable vehicle, noting that it has been garage kept with a battery tender. The car has only accumulated about 3,000 miles during sunny days, showcasing its excellent condition. Commenters have expressed their admiration for the car's beauty and performance, indicating excitement about its potential sale, while @Dgschofield reassures that it runs and drives smoothly like a brand-new vehicle, adding that the underside is extremely clean with no leaks or cracks.
Neutral: The auction includes various inquiries from potential buyers, with @RWDesign and @MagML asking specific questions about the car's features, including stereo functionality and maintenance history. @Dgschofield responds by providing detailed answers, including the presence of a USB cable for charging and music, and suggests that the car has had some servicing done. Discussions regarding the inclusion of factory wheels have also arisen, with @Dgschofield confirming they are not part of the sale, which seems to be clear to interested bidders.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about past maintenance, particularly from @MagML, who questions the servicing schedule and points out potentially deferred maintenance tasks that should have been performed. Additionally, @lorbuch expresses suspicion about bidding behaviors, questioning the legitimacy of a recent high bid that significantly outbid the previous one with only days left in the auction. This sentiment indicates unease within the auction process, though other users, like @gdspc and @Romart, defend their bids, highlighting the value of low mileage Miatas in the current market.
|
 |
Positive: @Fourtoes appreciates the vehicle's quality and nostalgia, recalling nice vehicles from the past. @RancherAR compliments the seller for uploading the videos and considers the truck to be nice. Overall, commenters show an interest in the vehicle's performance and history.
Neutral: @sampeterson and @bringatrailer point out some inconsistencies in the listing details regarding the transmission, leading to clarification from @davidworkman, the seller. @cornfieldave requests a driving video to showcase the vehicle in action, indicating a desire for transparency and insight into its capabilities. @davidworkman communicates effectively with potential buyers, addressing their questions and concerns.
Negative: @Fourtoes raises a concern about engine overhead noise and questions the valve lash setting, indicating potential issues. The seller acknowledges previous confusion about the transmission type, which could deter some buyers. Additionally, @cornfieldave's request for a driving video reflects a need for assurance regarding the vehicle's performance, suggesting some uncertainty among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @tesoffice shared their long-term positive experience with the C70, praising its comfort, distinctive styling, and reliability, stating they had a trouble-free ownership. @jstillman37 (The Seller) highlighted the car's strong performance and smooth drive, asserting that it is a fine example of the C70 coupe. @Captain_Cruz_Control expressed excitement at seeing any Volvo coupe, indicating the car's appeal among enthusiasts. @MikeRojoFive reminisced about the car's striking design and appearance in a movie, further adding to its allure.
Neutral: @Old_Ned provided insights comparing the C70 coupe to other models, noting driving enjoyment and concerns over the convertible's propensity for cowl shake. @m491 mentioned that there are support resources for common issues, including sunroof rattle, while also appreciating the C70's solid construction and unique styling. @volvorob pointed out a correction regarding the sound system in the car, clarifying it does not have the Dynaudio system but still has a good quality base system. @Stelathdg inquired about the timing belt replacement, reflecting common maintenance concerns among used car buyers.
Negative: @m491 raised the concern about the sunroof rattle, speculating on potential issues linked to the sunroof design. @Old_Ned highlighted historical problems with the Electronic Throttle Module in earlier models, indicating possible lingering concerns. Despite @jstillman37's (The Seller) assurances, there still seems to be some skepticism about the overall condition and potential issues inherent in such an older vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its luxurious features and impressive build quality. @CarDogThreePedals calls it a 'sporty automobile' and praises its 'authentic proper Lincoln' style. @JaDawgPNW and @Ramenator remark on its beauty and elegance, while @dantebat shares their long-term ownership experience, stating it drives and feels like a vault. @Pops43 emphasizes its vintage value, noting that despite its age, it represents an incredible investment compared to modern vehicles. The general sentiment reflects a deep appreciation for the vehicle’s aesthetics and performance, with multiple commenters describing it as stunning and classy.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the history and context surrounding the vehicle, with remarks hinting at its past ownership or the original pricing from decades ago. @mrags915 points out that $22K was a significant price tag in the 1970s, indicating its luxury status. @Geoffdavis999 and @markvguy engage in discussions about the car's mileage, condition, and previous ownership without a strong emotional attachment. Comments acknowledge the nostalgia this car brings and its status as part of automotive history, with @1903FoMoCo correcting terminology about its naming conventions and @67tbirdlover sharing anecdotes from their family, contextualizing the car's legacy.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the authenticity of the vehicle's mileage and history, particularly from @Geoffdavis999, who emphasizes the importance of documentation in confirming low mileage claims. @markvguy's involvement raises questions about its past, as he seeks verification for potential buyers. While the overwhelming majority of comments are positive, there are hesitations about the integrity of the seller's claims, suggesting that despite admiration for the car, potential buyers could exercise caution due to the various experiences shared about past purchases.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle showcase a high level of enthusiasm and admiration. @ThatJeepsGuy describes it as an "over-the-top build" that would make for an exhilarating drive, perfect for car shows or weekend outings. @BMWE90Guy expresses appreciation for the aesthetic of the vehicle, noting it as much better than the current lineup of Jeeps. @59caddyman, the seller, highlights that this custom-built Jeep is a stunning example of craftsmanship, reminiscent of a classic muscle car with a powerful 468ci engine, premium paint quality, and meticulous detailing that suggests a significant investment in its creation. Overall, the vehicle seems to impress those who comment regarding its look and capabilities.
Neutral: Several comments address logistical aspects or share neutral observations about the Jeep. @61ss inquires about the vehicle's location and the possibility of inspection, which @59caddyman promptly answers by confirming it is in Scottsdale and offering to arrange a viewing. @hensleyac raises a question regarding air conditioning, to which @59caddyman responds humorously, suggesting that removing the top and doors negates the need for A/C. These comments reflect a practical interest in the vehicle rather than an emotional response, adding a layer of informative exchange to the discussion.
Negative: Some comments include mild critiques or questions that hint at concerns regarding the vehicle. @ThatJeepsGuy notes that, while the Jeep is impressive, it would be more desirable with a metal tub instead of its current fiberglass one. Additionally, @hensleyac's inquiry about A/C and mention of South Florida weather could imply a downside for potential buyers in hotter climates, indicating a preference or need for comfort features. Meanwhile, @jaredbuyscars expresses disappointment that the vehicle isn't garnering more attention or bids, suggesting that the market response might not match the vehicle's apparent quality.
|
 |
Positive: @anthonyjp highlighted that the Blue on Red color combination looks great and suggested a personalized plate idea. @KMFViper10 expressed admiration for the same color scheme and indicated excitement about the auction, even though they missed the end of the previous one and wished the auctions were shorter. @Todd_F shared their fondness for the Blue with Red interior, noting its appeal and reminiscing about a friend's experience with a reliable Bentley, suggesting the model's overall quality.
Neutral: @Oklahoma-Bill raised questions about the vacuum lines and requested clear communication from the seller regarding the air suspension repairs, emphasizing the significance of these details for potential buyers. @Euro_Classica (The Seller) replied that they had conducted a smoke test with no leaks found, addressing some of the concerns raised. @bringatrailer thanked the community for the engaging discussions and reiterated the value of open conversations while highlighting the importance of focusing on the vehicles themselves.
Negative: However, there was notable criticism regarding the lack of answers from the seller, as @Oklahoma-Bill expressed frustration over unanswered questions and perceived dismissive comments directed at them. Other users, like @KMFViper10, felt that discussions about non-constructive feedback detracted from the genuine interest in the auction car. Overall, some participants voiced concerns about the transparency and clarity expected from the seller, reflecting a tense atmosphere in the commentary.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praises the 20/25 Saloon by Park Ward as a fabulous and elegant vehicle, highlighting its beautiful interior and charming provenance. They appreciate its role as an essential model for Rolls-Royce during the Great Depression, noting its powerful performance and luxurious design. Another commenter, @BusterBrakeline, expresses love for Pre-War RRs, calling them affordable and perfect for touring, mentioning they own two already and are considering more for their grandsons. @ACDBCACCCA is also impressed by the vehicle's unique features, like the curved rear glass, suggesting it adds to the car’s quality and authenticity.
Neutral: Several commenters have questions and observations about the car's condition and upgrades. @DAF notes a potential issue with the interior material, leaning towards vinyl rather than leather, while also acknowledging the charming history behind the car's modifications, like the updated rear visibility. @AmosHarrison inquires about the operational status of the sunshine roof and its water-tightness, prompting a response from the seller, @ForzaCarCompanyPA, who provides clarity on its current condition and operation. @BMcD appreciates the cold start and running videos, asking for more driving footage to assess performance.
Negative: Some comments express concerns regarding the car's mechanical state. @catbul1 mentions the engine's loudness, suspecting a questionable head, and indicates potential missing tools. They also critique the warming procedure in the cold start videos. @BusterBrakeline is worried about the car's service needs, asking whether it is in running order and suggesting the need for a video demonstration. @ForzaCarCompanyPA acknowledges that while the car has been run regularly to maintain its condition, it has only been driven around a building and has not been road inspected yet.
|
 |
Positive: @amotorsports (The Seller) describes the G37 coupe as a really nice car that is mechanically sound and has low miles, which indicates it is in good condition. The seller expresses enthusiasm for the listing and hopes to see a good outcome from the sale.
Neutral: @JChow is interested in seeing a cold start and driving video of the vehicle, but @amotorsports (The Seller) mentions that they are not in town to provide such footage right now. @JChow also inquires about whether the gallery gasket has been replaced, showing concern for the vehicle's maintenance history.
Negative: There are no explicitly negative comments in the available feedback, but the request for specific maintenance information by @JChow suggests some uncertainty or concern regarding the vehicle's condition that may require clarification.
|
 |
Positive: @Euro_Classica (The Seller) actively engages with commenters, providing requested videos and photos to demonstrate vehicle functionality and condition. They shared a walk-around video, images of all three locking differentials working, and a cold start video, indicating a willingness to assist potential buyers. They also responded promptly to requests for details about the vehicle, showing a commitment to transparency.
Neutral: Commenters have asked for additional information and visual proof related to specific components of the vehicle, such as the functionality of the lockers and the condition of the underbody. @tannermerrill19, @nkawa, and @socal_vc expressed interest in seeing videos and close-up images to evaluate these aspects better. Most inquiries are aimed at ensuring that the vehicle operates as expected and any issues are disclosed before a purchase is made.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle’s condition, particularly the presence of rust as mentioned by @tannermerrill19 and others. @W3350 pointed out a potential discrepancy in the locker indicators, suggesting that the lights were not functioning as intended. This raises some doubt regarding the reliability of the lockers, and @socal_vc emphasizes the importance of proper engagement to avoid costly repairs.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally appreciate the quality and performance of the vehicle. @Magnum21 remarked on how the car is 'spotless' with no flaws, suggesting a high level of maintenance and cleanliness. @OldGoat68 expressed admiration for the 2012-2013 Boss 302, noting it's a thrilling car to drive and wishing luck to bidders, indicating a positive sentiment about its driving experience. Additionally, @Saminukai08 (The Seller) highlighted the car's new tires and provided evidence of the vehicle's well-maintained condition, responding positively to inquiries.
Neutral: Several commenters posed questions regarding the vehicle’s specifications and features, showing an interest in understanding more about the car. @68CamaroSS396L78 asked about the type of transmission, confirming it has the MT82, and @ctalisman requested a copy of the original window sticker. @musclecarfan2 also noted a discrepancy on the Carfax report regarding mileage, prompting a response from @Saminukai08 (The Seller) who indicated that the issue was under review, thus displaying a degree of transparency about the car's history.
Negative: There were some concerns raised among commenters regarding the car's modifications and missing documentation. @NITROXROX pointed out that the vehicle does not sound stock and inquired about changes made, including the lower valance for mufflers. @66gal mentioned potential discrepancies in the tire brands on the car, requesting further verification of the details. Additionally, @musclecarfan2 highlighted the possibility of issues with the red track key activation and raised concerns about its support by Ford Performance, emphasizing the need for proper documentation.
|
 |
Positive: @RCEurope described the car as a "superb looking little Super in a fantastic and rare colour" and wished @Rivercars the best of luck with the auction. @Andrew found the vehicle to be nice and in a good color that wasn't available in the US, praising the strong engine and overall condition. The seller, @Rivercars, emphasized that the car features an Alfa Guilia Super motor, highlighting its performance and lineage.
Neutral: @GV1390 inquired about the reasons for showing pictures of the body refurbishment process and requested cold start and driving videos. @330america and @Watry both raised questions about the front and rear bumpers, demonstrating interest in their availability and installation. @Rivercars responded to these inquiries, confirming the presence of the bumpers and the features of the Alfa Giulia Super.
Negative: Several comments raised concerns regarding the oil pressure. @Shelz questioned if the low oil pressure noted during cold start and drive away videos was a potential issue. @okie_flats and @reformedwallstreeter echoed these worries, suggesting possible problems with the oil sender and requesting clarification about the functionality of other gauges and systems. @Rivercars responded to @Shelz, attributing the issue to a bad oil sender, but the concerns about indicators and system checks remain uncertain.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the overall aesthetic and features of the 2016 Mercedes-Benz E350 4MATIC Wagon. @nlust highlights its impressive specifications like the CarPlay/Android Auto capability and low mileage, calling it possibly the best non-AMG S212 to own. @Dollycat3 also admires the car's striking color, Dolomite Brown Metallic, while @DrivetheDriftless mentions the appealing color combo, indicating its rarity. Other users like @Conman70 and @Sidbo3 share positive experiences with their similar vehicles, praising the overall quality and reliability of the E-class wagons.
Neutral: Several comments focus on specific features and options without strong opinions, reflecting curiosity rather than clear approval or disapproval. @Carole inquires about the driver's assistance package, while @MM27 seeks clarification on adding CarPlay, depicting a desire for information. @tbred mentions interest in changing the steering wheel, showing an appreciation for the car but also desire for customization. @Ricster raises a question regarding spark plug replacement records, adding an informative perspective regarding vehicle maintenance.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns or point out shortcomings, including potential maintenance issues. @Coynefucius mentions that the Dolomite Brown color can be polarizing, indicating that it may not appeal to everyone. @Monomoyrips asks about a faulty air vent, inquiring about repair difficulty, highlighting potential hidden issues with the car. @th_boone discusses missing features like keyless go and adaptive lights, suggesting that the omission could make the car more future-proof but questioning the overall specification. Overall, while the sentiment toward the vehicle is largely positive, some reservations are noted.
|
 |
Positive: @Pig4life (The Seller) describes the vehicle as an awesome truck, showcasing its utility by mentioning a successful recovery of another vehicle using it. He reflects on his positive experience with trucks, particularly recalling a manual truck he owned back in high school. Another commenter, @Greatwhite97, expresses enthusiasm about the vehicle by stating they would consider driving it despite their preference for manual transmissions.
Neutral: @lunchbeast inquires about the vehicle's tire size and whether the differentials have been regeared, while @JLsKA510 asks for updates on the posting of cold start and driving videos. @Epilepsy shows interest in viewing the vehicle in person and requests information on when it would be available.
Negative: @I-XLR8 humorously comments on the presence of a Cummins badge on the truck, questioning its authenticity and implying confusion. @Pig4life (The Seller) responds with the context that the badge was added as a joke by the previous owner's child, but this raises questions about modifications or the truck's features.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle, a 2-owner E92 M3 Competition Package, has been described as a clean example with extensive service history and is noted for its high-revving V8 engine, which adds to its mystique and driving experience. The seller, @p1_motorcars_ltd, emphasizes their commitment to quality, stating how they source and prep cars to meet high standards for auction. Furthermore, they express excitement about the unique characteristics of this model and its rarity in stock form, reinforcing that it is a valuable option for collectors and enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several users have engaged with thoughtful questions about the vehicle's origin, features, and condition. @DieselM333 inquired about how @p1_motorcars_ltd acquired the car, while @AnthonyT1 and @thorgoth expressed concern about specific mechanical components. @Mookie45 pointed out a potential issue with the car's roof, which @p1_motorcars_ltd promptly clarified was just a lighting effect. There has also been interest in additional video content to demonstrate the car's features and operation, which @p1_motorcars_ltd has assured they will provide as the auction progresses.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's technical aspects have been brought up by multiple users. For instance, @AnthonyT1 and @thorgoth queried about whether critical parts like the rod bearings and throttle actuators had been replaced, and @Bizz73 noted a flashing issue with the IDrive display. Additionally, debates arose regarding the gaps in the car's hood alignment, with @uses0ap and @CarbonBlack88 suggesting potential misalignments that could be a common issue with this model. The seller has attempted to address these concerns and confirmed adjustments were made, yet the need for clear communication regarding the car's condition remains evident.
|
 |
Positive: @Bevilaqua- (The Seller) expresses gratitude towards potential bidders and shows eagerness to engage with the audience by inviting questions. The seller clarifies that the Porsche was intended as a driver and tracker, highlighting the vehicle's performance potential. There's a sense of care for the car as @Bevilaqua- mentions wanting to avoid exposure to salt and taking steps to ensure it remains clean for the next owner.
Neutral: Additional comments from various users seeking clarification provide insights into the car's history. @S30993t and @TaBMH bring up previous ownership and maintenance details, while @ellensuzette inquires about the car's specifications. The seller responds promptly, confirming aspects like rear-wheel drive and the lack of rust, demonstrating thoroughness in addressing concerns.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the car's maintenance history as @S30993t suggests that the engine rebuild performed by the previous owner may not have been professionally done, thus urging potential buyers to conduct due diligence. There are also concerns about the presence of oil and other fluids in the auction, leading to speculation about the car's condition. The seller attempts to alleviate worries by sharing information but there's an underlying skepticism about the vehicle's past.
|
 |
Positive: @sexycarchik13, the seller, expresses gratitude to bidders and commenters for their interest in the auction, highlighting that all vehicles are sold as is and encouraging potential buyers to conduct their due diligence. Several attendees, including @ThatJeepsGuy and @mussberger, praise the vehicle for its aesthetics and condition, with @mussberger noting the impressive cleanliness of the frame. The vehicle is described as a beautiful first-generation TJ Sahara with notable features and options, making it an appealing choice for prospective buyers.
Neutral: The comments reveal an engaging discussion regarding the vehicle's features and specifications. @rivrboat1976 shares insights about the vehicle's original equipment and offers to provide a detailed build sheet for further information. Additionally, @tripletip raises questions about the Jeep’s soft top frame and potential repainting, while @hbasham asks for more detailed images of mechanical components, showcasing the interest in the vehicle's upkeep and transparency in the auction process.
Negative: Concerns are raised by some participants regarding the vehicle's condition and previous modifications. @Dirtyhermit inquires about the operation of the Jeep's components and the specifics of the rear differential, suggesting a level of skepticism about its reliability. @tripletip's observation about possible overspray hints at doubts regarding the vehicle's paintwork history. Overall, while the comments are largely positive, they reflect a cautious perspective among bidders regarding the vehicle's history and condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the 2001 Nissan Xterra XE, highlighting its nostalgic value and reliability. @Z06Shannon reminisced about the joy of owning the vehicle during high school, while @Kie praised the ruggedness and fun driving experience it offers. Others like @Roth517 and @Trooptroop noted the good looks and engaging driving characteristics of this first-generation model, appreciating the strong, dependable VG33E engine paired with a 5-speed manual transmission.
Neutral: The seller, @Kenny360, provided detailed information regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, addressing concerns transparently. He noted that the Xterra has undergone significant preventative maintenance recently, including a timing belt replacement and various inspections, which have alleviated many common issues associated with the model. Several commenters asked clarifying questions about the car's features and maintenance records, indicating a shared interest in its service history and functionality.
Negative: Despite the praise, some concerns were raised, particularly concerning the vehicle's prior maintenance and condition. @shadylane pointed out known issues with the fuel system and distributor in first-generation Xterras, prompting @Kenny360 to confirm these components had been inspected without problems. Additionally, @TXDesFox questioned the lack of registration renewal since 2015, to which @Kenny360 explained the one-owner status and the vehicle's history of being underutilized, leading to further scrutiny about its overall upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: @Wboanna1 praises the vehicle as a "sweet truck" and highlights its desirable features such as the 5-speed transmission and PPump Cummins engine, which are regarded as the best. The commentator notes the low mileage and expresses confidence that it should command a good sale price for the seller. Similarly, @bosshoss3406pack describes the vehicle as a "low mileage workhorse ready to go" and asserts that it should bring all the money, reflecting a strong belief in its value and reliability.
Neutral: @Wrightcustom, who is the seller, addresses concerns raised by potential buyers regarding the CarFax report, which indicates multiple owners in a short time frame. The seller clarifies that the vehicle has not actually exchanged hands; it was primarily registered under a business name before transitioning to the owner's personal name following the sale of the business. The truck was then relocated and registered in a different state, providing context for the ownership history without indicating any true issues.
Negative: @Novacaine72 raises a critical question about the vehicle's ownership history, expressing concern over the fact that there have been four owners in the last five years. This comment suggests potential red flags for buyers who may be wary of vehicles that have changed hands frequently, implying possible underlying problems or concerns about the truck's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 expressed admiration for the vehicle, stating it is beautiful and praising the combination of Polar White exterior and Black Nappa leather interior. Several commenters, including @Vpippolito and @ironmikey12, shared well wishes for @lcollins58's wife, showing empathy towards the situation surrounding the sale. @CarsBicyclesAndSushi noted the aerodynamic optimization of the wheels, contributing a light-hearted touch to the discussion while extending best wishes for recovery. @lcollins58 appreciates the supportive comments and maintains a polite tone, actively engaging with potential buyers.
Neutral: @lcollins58 (The Seller) explained that the vehicle was purchased for his wife but is being sold due to her injuries. He provided details about the auction, mentioning that it has realistic reserves and that he is willing to answer questions from bidders. He clarified the warranty details, confirming a 4-year warranty starting from the purchase date and not providing massage seats, as inquired by @belairlover. @BrianBIN and @Sebpop questioned the tire brand, with @lcollins58 confirming that he has not had time to replace them due to his caregiving responsibilities.
Negative: Several comments reflected concerns about the necessity of selling the vehicle, with @wakin expressing sadness over the situation and hoping for a strong recovery for @lcollins58's wife. The inquiry from @BoostProjects about whether the Falken tires were installed by the seller implied skepticism about their quality. Overall, the atmosphere surrounding the comments was sympathetic but noted the unfortunate need to sell a new and beloved vehicle due to circumstances beyond the seller's control.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and practicality. @GDogg described the GTC4Lusso T as 'magnificent' and 'Bellissima!' @Wob (The Seller) praised the car's color combination, stating it is 'incredible,' 'fun to drive,' and 'utterly usable' with spacious back seats and a large trunk. @joshg1 shared a personal anecdote about his changing appreciation for such models, now finding them 'incredibly seductive.' Meanwhile, @icaruspete complimented the photography of the listing, suggesting a well-executed presentation enhances the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: Some comments presented a mixed perspective on certain aspects of the vehicle. @PorschePhi1 worried that the car resembled a 'station wagon,' raising questions about its design choices. @hansleyac asked about service records and whether any maintenance work had occurred in the past five years, emphasizing the importance of transparency in vehicle history. @Josheafla pointed out minor scratches, indicating common concerns about vehicle condition that potential buyers should consider.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's features and history. @rdot lamented the absence of a glass roof, while @New001 would have preferred a V12 engine option, suggesting a limitation in performance or desirability. @hensleyac pointed out a lack of service records on Carfax, raising doubts about the thoroughness of the vehicle's maintenance history. Furthermore, @Josheafla's request for clearer images of scratches indicates a need for more transparency in condition specifics, which some potential buyers might find off-putting.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the aesthetic appeal and potential of the LS-swapped 1966 Chevy Impala Sport Coupe, with @BloodyHell describing it as a cool 'School Whip' and @PiRround noting its hefty motor, sleek body, and great stance. @Lrap74 expressed excitement, labeling it a 'Sweet ride,' while @yahelou and others are eager to see videos demonstrating the air ride system in action, indicating their enthusiasm for its custom features. Overall, despite some questions about the vehicle's specifics, the general impression is that it’s a desirable lowrider with a fantastic look and potential for fun.
Neutral: Several users sought clarification about the vehicle's details, such as @MarsLaJolla inquiring whether the air ride is active and whether additional videos could be provided. @yahelou requested more information concerning the motor, the transmission, and any hidden spots of rust, while @Signguy61 was specifically curious about what part was hanging from the front of the car, alluding to the need for more visual documentation. @Vremacs-BAT offered insights into the battery setup, indicating that having more batteries could be common practice in the lowriding scene, suggesting that the community is engaged and knowledgeable about such modifications.
Negative: On the downside, there are concerns regarding the condition and functionality of the vehicle. @ejwil pointed out what appears to be a sagging component in the front, while @Vremacs-BAT noted that the air ride system might need attention, suggesting potential leaks. The seller, @HKMotorcars, acknowledged existing issues, indicating that the air ride system is manually controlled without a proper controller and that there may be a leak requiring attention. The vehicle lacks comprehensive service records, and @User32wa’s comment about the numerous batteries and dangling cables has raised doubt about the vehicle's readiness for immediate use.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Suzuki GS1000, highlighting it as an iconic superbike from the seventies. @Vin51 noted the bike's build quality and nostalgic value, while @gman111111 shared a personal anecdote about how the bike's superior brakes helped him avoid an accident. @trailerjoe reminisced about the general reliability and comfort of Suzuki bikes from that era, suggesting the GS1000 can serve various purposes, from basic repairs to more complex modifications. @AustinDemo62 and @Motosyco echoed these sentiments, considering the bike a great investment and a rare, unaltered find.
Neutral: Several users engaged in discussions about the specifics of the bike's model year and condition. @btfox28 pointed out discrepancies between the bike's listed year and its actual manufacturing features, leading to multiple commenters, including @sharkie104 and @OldBoldBiker, requesting further verification. @Number35 (The Seller) provided clarifications on the engine's functionality, asserting that it turns over with proper compression and discussing the potential for minor repairs like a weak flasher relay. This interaction reflects a shared interest in ensuring buyers have accurate information about the motorcycle's condition.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding the bike's condition and discrepancies in the listing. @lunchbeast challenged the seller's description, questioning the accuracy of the claimed drilled rotors in the photos, while other users expressed skepticism about the bike's true model year. Further questions arose about oil pressure and electrical issues, as raised by @edmugia, and the overall condition of the used parts was also a topic of scrutiny. @Number35 addressed these issues directly, indicating a willingness to share more detailed information and test results to clarify the bike's status.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its nostalgic appeal and historical significance. @Jaybird_57 fondly recalled the classic design, noting the Cougar's aesthetics as superior to the Mustang and emphasizing the car's charm. @Antboss praised the combination of class and muscle in the Cougar, describing it as one of their favorites. Furthermore, @DHelge (The Seller) reassured potential buyers about the car's originality and condition, with detailed descriptions of its mechanical state and maintenance history.
Neutral: Comments on the vehicle's condition included inquiries about specific features and potential updates. @SMMc_71 appreciated the transparency of the ad, while expressing a desire for clarity regarding the car's location, which was confirmed by @Benzo63. Additionally, @Bekks01 requested further inspection of the vehicle, specifically concerning rust repairs, indicating an interest in its overall integrity. Some users noted on the vehicle's general specifications, like paint color or seating materials, without strong opinions either way.
Negative: Concerns regarding the car's condition were raised by a few commenters, pointing out inconsistencies or potential restoration needs. @Cougar_Guy highlighted that the shift lever seemed incorrect for an XR7 model, suggesting possible modifications. @e9er observed that the car might have staggered wheels, which they noted as a negative without further context. @highgeer found the statement about tire-changing tools to be awkward, hinting at confusion about the car's accessories. Overall, while there was enthusiasm for the vehicle, some skepticism regarding its authenticity and condition was also evident.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters were largely impressed with the vehicle, describing it as a 'great-looking truck' and 'absolutely beautiful'. @leaffan couldn’t find anything to change, while @boaboyoz dubbed it a 'sensational Suburban' and 'extraordinarily exquisite'. Several highlighted the aesthetics and craftsmanship of the build, with @tlcamg appreciating the interior's comfort and inviting family-friendly ambiance. Overall, there is a strong consensus that the vehicle's appeal is both visually striking and well-built, with comments on the investment in the vehicle underscoring its quality.
Neutral: Comments often asked for clarification or additional details regarding specific aspects of the vehicle, such as performance metrics or build specifics. @MadMotorClub inquired about horsepower and torque figures, while @Rextrdr sought information on axle specifications. @Mcfly1985 (The Seller) provided detailed responses about the vehicle's components, including drivetrain specifics and tuning. Inquiries like these reflect an interest in understanding the capabilities of the Suburban beyond its aesthetics.
Negative: Some comments expressed concerns or suggestions for improvement. @OffRoader23 suggested the need for different wheels, and @Irebld remarked that certain features like rear AC would have enhanced the value of the build. Meanwhile, @MSS1200 humorously suggested that such a costly vehicle should come with a full factory warranty, which reflects a level of skepticism regarding the vehicle despite its eye-catching design. These views indicate that while many hold the vehicle in high regard, there are aspects where improvements could be made.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its pristine condition and meticulous craftsmanship. @anthonyjp remarked on the car's exceptionally clean undercarriage, while @p1_motorcars_ltd noted the impressive time, thought, and money invested, stating that even as someone who wasn’t typically a fan of swaps, this build changed their perspective. @cruisewoodward claimed it was the best Coyote swapped Foxbody they had seen, highlighting the high quality of work. Commenters like @Discobob and @BarryMcCauckiner echoed similar sentiments, appreciating the clean aesthetic and the extensive effort put into the build. Overall, the car was seen as a stunning example of automotive restoration and modernization, capturing the admiration of many enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments expressed curiosity about the high build cost, with some commentators attempting to justify the extensive investment of over $300k. @mustangking and @Z282SLO questioned the pricing and labor expense, indicating that while the car was nice, the labor costs raised eyebrows. @Zeusmonster highlighted the detailed explanation of the build, noting that the high-quality work done was indicative of the significant amount of money spent. A few commenters, including @NVGT350, acknowledged the rigorous effort and customization that went into the vehicle while also humorously expressing skepticism about market value.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters expressed concerns about the sensibility of the build costs and the decision to sell the car after such a significant investment. @oldguy75 questioned why so much money would be poured into the vehicle only to sell it, and others like @laffs and @Prokill1 suggested that certain aspects, such as the $14k wheels, seemed excessive. @CarolinaPeej raised alarms over potential issues like oil burning at startup, implying that the premium investment might lead to unforeseen problems. Overall, while the car was praised for quality and aesthetics, doubts lingered about the high costs and the practicality of such a build.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed great enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its unique features and appeal. @Z06Shannon described it as 'incredible,' and @Chuchip touted its advantages over tiny homes, deeming it 'way cooler.' Additionally, @ibuprofen admired the rear storage drawers for their practicality, indicating that such features enhance usability.
Neutral: Comments from @Bptasienski and @WantAEurovan sought clarifications about specific aspects of the vehicle. @Bptasienski inquired about a potential rodent nest under the hood, to which @avjoseph13 (The Seller) responded, noting a need for cleaning rather than pest issues. @WantAEurovan asked about the compatibility of the rear-facing seats with the flooring, and @avjoseph13 explained the possibility of re-adding the seats for increased space.
Negative: Concerns were raised about some elements of the vehicle, including its accessories. @mistakesweremade questioned the purpose of brackets on the pop top roof, wondering if they indicated previous use for a rack or awning, as well as potential leak issues. @Larsmeister32 expressed disappointment that the Yakima roof rack was not included with the sale, while @Sunday99Driver requested videos showcasing the vehicle's functionality and details about the keys, indicating a desire for more assurance on performance.
|
 |
Positive: @SlackAttack (The Seller) expresses great enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting that it exceeded their expectations with its build quality and driving experience. Numerous commenters share their appreciation for the car's features, such as the low mileage, new clutch, and excellent color combination, mentioning the desirability of the 987.2 generation and praising the seller for their transparency and proactive approach. @MTH notes that the seller's introduction eliminates concerns about common issues, indicating confidence in the car's condition, which many agree is appealing and likely to attract serious bidders.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the auction process and pricing dynamics. @Blackjack21 raises a question about the unusual wear on the driver's side A pillar, while other commenters inquire about various aspects of the car's condition and features, such as the lien issue and original modifications. The dialogue also touches on the comparison between different Cayman models, with participants sharing insights and asking for clarifications, reflecting an engaged community that values detailed information about the vehicle.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about aspects of the car's condition, such as @Spokayman noting the uncommon wear of the clutch at 28K miles and seeking insight from the previous owner. @tjd233 mentions that the current bidding price seems excessive, suggesting a disconnect with the market's expectations. Overall, while the car is well-regarded, there are hints of skepticism regarding its maintenance history and pricing strategy, which the seller addresses openly.
|
 |
Positive: @Mercuryman notes the impressive condition of the vehicle's underside, highlighting the benefits of California vehicles. @Shaank94 (The Seller) expresses excitement about offering a well-equipped GMT800 and is proactive in engaging with potential buyers by inviting questions and requests for shipping quotes. Users like @rgfulks appreciate the clean appearance of the truck and the detailed updates regarding the dual exhaust system, which has been confirmed by the seller to feature flowmaster mufflers. @Basque33 and others express interest in additional videos and specifications, indicating a genuine enthusiasm for the vehicle.
Neutral: @Shaank94 (The Seller) provides clear answers to inquiries regarding the truck's features, confirming that everything else is stock besides the exhaust and performance intake. The seller also reassures potential buyers about the truck's compliance with California emissions laws and offers to provide necessary documentation such as a valid smog certificate. @ManChandler raises a question about potential paint touch-ups on the vehicle, to which @Shaank94 explains the issue with the clear coat, indicating transparency and a willingness to address concerns from potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments suggest minor concerns regarding the truck's condition, such as the paint touch-up marks mentioned by @ManChandler. Additionally, @MSbold6 queries whether all modifications are stock aside from the exhaust and intake, indicating potential hesitation about the truck's authenticity. @sloloco experienced a communication issue with the seller, which may point to logistical challenges in the purchasing process. Overall, while the responses are mostly positive, there are hints of reservations regarding minor cosmetic issues and communication.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 found the vehicle to be very swanky, while @MPM97turbo expressed anticipation for getting to experience the luxury of a Maybach. @Iyagyaev77 (The Seller) highlighted the impressive features of the family-owned 2025 Mercedes GLS Maybach 600, which has under 3k miles, including a beautifully spec’d two-tone exterior and numerous luxury amenities such as 23-inch wheels, champagne flute holders, a refrigerator, and picnic tables. @GRiehl and @SpringTrailing echoed the sentiment about the practicality and luxury of the Maybach, noting that it offers a remarkable experience for both drivers and passengers.
Neutral: @AUDIologist shared an insightful perspective, admitting he's never been in a Maybach but describes it as a luxury that could be worth its price tag. @SpringTrailing presented a question regarding a potential typo on the vehicle's window sticker, requesting confirmation about whether any paint work has been performed on the car. @Iyagyaev77 (The Seller) clarified that the vehicle has always been garage kept and there has been no paint work done, ensuring that the vehicle's condition remains authentic to its original state.
Negative: @SpringTrailing noted a concern regarding the window sticker, highlighting that it lists a silver upper and black lower which could lead to confusion. @AUDIologist made an offhand comment comparing the vehicle’s side profile to a hearse, implying a humorous yet somewhat morbid association with wealth and luxury. Overall, while the comments primarily leaned positive, these observations hint at a bit of skepticism regarding specifics, without dampening the enthusiasm surrounding the Maybach.
|
 |
Positive: @tatunayj (The Seller) emphasized the value of the vehicle with genuine TRD components sourced over years of ownership. The upgrades include items like TRD exhaust, strut bar, and wheels, which highlights the car's authenticity and performance focus. @nexusautobrokers appreciated the vehicle's appeal, while @timberframe noted a recent sale at Mecum Kissimmee that exceeded expectations, showcasing the market interest in similar cars. Additionally, @severx13 expressed admiration for the vehicle, identifying it as their dream car, indicating a strong desirability among enthusiasts.
Neutral: There were comments regarding the condition and history of the vehicle that provided additional context. @tatunayj (The Seller) explained the car's inspection history, mentioning its Grade 4 rating from a 2017 auction, which reflects good overall condition after prior repairs. This transparency about its past was reassuring for potential bidders. @bringatrailer thanked @tatunayj (The Seller) for updates on the listing, which shows a collaborative interaction between the seller and the auction platform regarding the vehicle.
Negative: Some inquiries raised concerns about the vehicle's past, particularly regarding collision history. @DSM_enthusiast questioned the significance of the collision and the nature of the damage, indicating a potential red flag for some buyers. In addition, @maxafranks12 questioned the pricing of the car, suggesting that the market might find the listing unusually high for its current state. @Elgriton's comment on the snow in Temecula California was unrelated but could reflect on the questionable condition or location of the vehicle in the context of the sale.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and classic appeal. @goldengup emphasizes that adding only 2,000 miles in two years showcases the owner's enjoyment of the car. @GLWA praises the replacement of parts as cheap insurance for an older car, enhancing reliability and allowing for enjoyable road trips. @Chuchip shares a nostalgic memory of the car's large size and beauty, emphasizing appreciation for its design. @JH996C4S also shares a love for the car, indicating that it is refreshed and ready for the road.
Neutral: In terms of service and maintenance, @Jcp22 (The Seller) provides insight into the work completed on the vehicle, attributing it to age and a dedication to originality. The seller mentions purchasing new Lincoln specialty tires, highlighting the attention given to maintaining the car's classic status. @antonvt inquires about another vehicle featured in the video, indicating curiosity around the seller's inventory and potentially expanding interest in classic cars.
Negative: However, some comments reveal concerns about the vehicle's quirks. @Noisyboyz recounts a troubling experience with the cruise control malfunctioning, leading to a dangerous situation where the car could not slow down properly. This raises questions about engineering reliability in older models like this one. Additionally, @Msasteel questions why such costly maintenance was needed in a short ownership period, suggesting a lack of confidence regarding the vehicle's condition and reliability. Overall, while the vehicle has many admirers, there are underlying concerns regarding its mechanical integrity.
|
 |
Positive: @fka_ray highlighted that this Cougar convertible is a rare find, being the last of its kind for Mercury, and praised its clean, low-mileage condition. @Gord6 described the vehicle as beautiful and unappreciated, noting it as a rich man's version of the Mustang, while @ElectricWizard1 complimented the refurbishment quality, acknowledging the attractive side profile. @starchild shared a nostalgic story about their dream of owning a Cougar, emphasizing the rarity of the 73 convertible and its sporty design, expressing strong interest in the vehicle.
Neutral: @PetalumaDawg requested the seller to post a video of a cold start and a driving test, while @earlebird asked for clarification on the A/C system's functionality. The seller, @astroautosales, responded positively to both inquiries, confirming that the A/C blows cold and that they had added videos showing various features of the Cougar. @Oldstyle66 asked about vehicle storage options, to which @astroautosales assured that they could accommodate storage needs until the end of February, with potential flexibility.
Negative: @earlebird expressed concern over the A/C fitting types and sought confirmation of the system's operational status. Additionally, @dirkrowdies inquired about the possibility of improving the scratches on the fender crease, suggesting that they could potentially be polished out. @astroautosales acknowledged the scratches, stating they are typically hard to notice but provided a close-up photo to illustrate the issue.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the car's unique interior color combination, with @CaptainObvious expressing strong admiration by saying "I LOVE it!" @wtjewell finds the Provence blue color particularly attractive and @boatymcboatface describes the interior as beautiful. @scottstreet considers the 1995 993 to be the best car ever made, highlighting its usability and the appealing full leather option. @Air-cooled acknowledges the car's effectiveness, particularly the AC when operating correctly, pointing out their positive experience with their similarly aged vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @Vic, is engaging with the interest shown by potential buyers, providing details about the car's condition and repairs, like newly installed tires and fluid changes. @Jay54 raises concerns about the car's maintenance history, but @Vic reassures him that the previous owner had minimal use of the vehicle. @b_trenkamp emphasizes the need for underside photos, while @WReiter and @GTgirl ask specific questions regarding the car's mileage and potential repairs to various components, indicating a thoughtful evaluation process from prospective buyers.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition have been voiced by some commenters. @Jay54 points out that the cosmetics are rough, questioning the owner's maintenance habits, as there are no recent service records available. @6thinline9 notes potential needs arising from the car's age, including a wiring harness issue, and mentions a possible investment required to ensure longevity. @S14N911 inquires about the functionality of the oil and temperature gauges, indicating that there are still uncertainties regarding the car's operational status.
|
1,100-Mile 2023 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat Widebody Jailbreak
2C3CDZC94PH633109
Lot 227987
Private Party
 |
Positive: @parshooter expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its unique Triple Nickel silver finish. They also noted the car's impressive condition, mentioning its low mileage and asking for further information about its background. @fastdad56 (The Seller) confirmed that the car has been well-cared-for, never seen rain, and has only been cleaned using a waterless wash, ensuring its pristine condition. Other comments, such as @Gen2Vipers, remarked on the car being a 'sinister example,' further emphasizing its appealing aesthetics.
Neutral: @BloodyHell and @topduarte contributed light-hearted comments to the discussion, with @BloodyHell appreciating the lead photo for its humorous perspective while @topduarte suggested improving the auction by including photos without shadows. Both comments reflect an engagement with the auction content without making strong personal evaluations of the vehicle.
Negative: @Bill488 questioned the sanity of @mlazarus in a disrespectful manner, implying that there might be a misunderstanding or disagreement regarding the vehicle's evaluation. This could deter potential buyers from considering the comments as constructive feedback. The tone of this exchange introduces a sour note to the overall discussion surrounding the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors are very enthusiastic about the vehicle, praising it as a great example of an unmolested 1968 model. @daygo1966 calls it a 'great example' and @honda50 echoes this sentiment by expressing hope that it stays in its original state. @vonroll appreciates the originality of the bike, noting that it retains various original components such as the seat and muffler, which he reflects on fondly from his childhood experiences. @gasandgears highlights its status as a first-year model that is all original, expressing a strong preference for honest survivors. Commentors like @Doubledog provide encouragement for the seller, stating that they hope it remains in its original condition and agree with @gasandgears that over-restoration is not necessary. Overall, the strong feelings of nostalgia and appreciation for the bike's originality contribute to a positive view of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commentors share factual observations about the bike. @Lth1964, the seller, speaks of their personal history with the model, recounting fond memories tied to its design and original state. This backstory offers context but does not overtly sway the comments toward a positive or negative direction. Inquiries from commentors like @Doubledog reflect curiosity about specific features of the bike, such as the muffler slant guard. @X-77Keith provides clarification on the production changes regarding the slant guard, contributing a neutral but informative tone to the discussion. Additionally, logistical remarks regarding shipping costs are made by @vonroll and @gasandgears, discussing reasonable shipping arrangements without emotional attachment to the bike itself.
Negative: While the overwhelming sentiment is positive, there are few neutral observations that exhibit caution. @BlindLemonPie suggests that sellers should improve their video presentation, indicating a dissatisfaction with how items are showcased. This highlights the tendency for commentors to desire higher standards in selling practices. There is also an acknowledgment from some users about preservation challenges, such as potential brittleness of older components, as noted by @vonroll. While these comments are not outrightly negative, they do express concerns that may affect the potential attractiveness of the vehicle to some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly noting its nostalgic appeal and aesthetics. @Pettyfan43 referred to it as 'super cool' and a reminder of the mini truck fad from the early 80s. @craZee called it one of the best-looking truck designs ever, while @Big_DaddyRL saw great potential for a 'next life' with modifications, emphasizing its strong foundation. @TDCYO406 (The Seller) shared a driving video, adding to the positive reception by showcasing the truck's performance and charm. Numerous comments highlighted the truck's patina and uniqueness, cultivating a sense of community appreciation for this classic vehicle.
Neutral: Some comments sought additional information on the truck's capabilities and specifics. For instance, @bulletnozeguy inquired about the truck's engine performance and the presence of critical components like the original seat. @josegthe3rd asked about an owner's manual and service history, while @zeniceguy wanted to assess its long-distance driving viability. @TDCYO406 (The Seller) provided details about the truck's operation at high RPMs and confirmed its smooth running condition. This exchange indicates that potential buyers are considering both the aesthetics and functionality of the vehicle.
Negative: While overall responses were mostly positive, some concerns were raised about the truck's condition and performance. @bulletnozeguy emphasized the importance of seeing detailed pictures of the bed and other critical components, expressing worries about potential damage affecting repairs. Additionally, there was uncertainty around the truck's ability to pass smog checks, pointing to a lack of definitive answers in @TDCYO406's replies. These queries reflect reservations among some commenters regarding the vehicle's readiness for use and whether it meets local emissions standards.
|
 |
Positive: @cruisewoodward describes the vehicle as "Stunning!" which encapsulates the overall admiration for its aesthetics. @cascade_classics loves the car and shares enthusiasm about related footage, pointing to its beautiful design and detailed build page. Other comments celebrate the vehicle's restomod quality, with @PaulEZ appreciating the unchanged classic character and @CABERNET2GO declaring it "serendipitously voluptuously scrupulous!" Additionally, @TFryer thanks the previous owner for the car's attitude and @VH911 likens the driving video to a scene from a classic film, demonstrating the positive impressions it leaves on viewers.
Neutral: Several commenters express interest in specific details about the vehicle's functionality and condition without overtly negative or positive leanings. @sponge66 raises a question about the speedometer's performance during the driving video, suggesting it could be an intermittent issue. @Stretch999 inquires about potential electrical problems, the purpose of the roll cage, and any existing paint issues, showing a desire for more clarity on the car's overall condition, which @911r, the seller, addresses by confirming all functions work and the high quality of the paint job.
Negative: Other comments present concerns regarding minor issues with the vehicle. @sponge66 continues to express skepticism about the speedometer, noting its erratic behavior in the video, which @911r (The Seller) attempts to clarify. Meanwhile, @carsick humorously comments on the sun visor's inability to stay in position, indicating a trivial yet notable flaw that detracts from the car's overall appeal. The inquiries from @Stretch999 about electrical and performance issues also hint at an underlying apprehension regarding the vehicle's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @cardude76 describes the vehicle as a gorgeous piece of German engineering, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and quality. @P0rsche956 finds it to be a pleasant sporty daily driver that brings joy when driven, appreciating its performance characteristics. @hawkwrestling concurs, noting that not all models of this type are subject to recalls and affirming the car's beauty, wishing good luck with the auction.
Neutral: @ozarkman2000 inquires about the circumstances surrounding the previous sale's failure, while @Msobczyk clarifies that the reserve was not met. @connect2us raises questions about any completed repairs or recalls, indicating the importance of vehicle history. @adchaudary expresses interest in seeing the car in person, highlighting the usual auction process while @Jeremyf1 speculates on the timing of brake-related photos, questioning the maintenance history.
Negative: @mike_747 points out that the high MSRP of the vehicle makes the reserve substantial, implying that the expectations may not align with the market's perceived value. @Benzjamin shares concerns about a potential recall on the drive shaft, noting that the seller did not have documentation indicating repairs were completed, which may deter potential buyers. Lastly, @Tubeguy mentions discomfort with the seats, suggesting they lack sufficient cushioning, which may affect comfort during use.
|
 |
Positive: @Lotus7A praised GCCars as a seller, having had multiple pleasant transactions in the past. They highlighted the vehicle's impressive appearance, mentioning it as a 'beauty' that someone will be fortunate to add to their garage. Additionally, @GCCars noted that the car recently featured in a promotional video for West Virginia, which the film crew appreciated for its fine condition.
Neutral: @GCCars responded to inquiries about the car's maintenance, indicating that they have no records of recent timing chain work. They also confirmed that the dashboard retains its original finish and there is no significant body rust, apart from minor surface corrosion on the undercarriage components. Furthermore, they acknowledged the car's original paint, attesting to its remarkable condition for being 50 years old.
Negative: @orw1 raised concerns regarding potential oil or vacuum leaks and the functionality of the vehicle's electronics. @GCCars confirmed that while the radio antenna is non-functional, they are not aware of any oil or vacuum leaks, suggesting potential buyers examine the detailed undercarriage photographs for further assurance. The absence of detailed maintenance records, especially pertaining to the timing chain, might concern some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters share a sense of excitement about the vehicle's appearance and its overall condition. @mdwylie expressed a fondness for the car's aesthetic appeal, particularly its red color and interior, noting that despite paying what may have been a high price for a car with 37k miles, he felt satisfied with the value. @Crovet complimented the rear 3/4 view of the E85, acknowledging the design prowess of Mr. Bangle. Additionally, @jfstringer783 (The Seller) has been proactive in providing various details and updates, such as offering to send a video of the vehicle's imperfections, which suggests a willingness to ensure transparency with potential buyers.
Neutral: Some comments focus on technical aspects and maintenance history, without strong sentiment. @jfed14331 and @RichWolfson inquired about specific maintenance issues like rod bearings and the navigation system. The Seller responded with detailed explanations, indicating that certain checks and replacements were routine and typical given the vehicle's mileage. The discussions about the condition and updates regarding the navigation system provided a factual overview that helped clarify uncertainties for interested parties, showcasing a transparent dialogue.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's past incidents and potential issues. For instance, @2008bimmerM3 questioned why there had been significant work done on the vehicle with only 44k miles, suggesting potential underlying problems. @Gjud678 highlighted worries about the DSC system, the non-functional convertible top from 2021, and a past vandalism incident where the catalytic converter was stolen, prompting inquiries about any resultant damage. The Seller addressed these concerns but acknowledged the vehicle's past repairs and incidents, which may leave some prospective buyers wary of its history.
|
 |
Positive: @Quikvet expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's color and spec, linking it to strong marketplace expectations, while @ChampionPorsche and @bc31 highlighted the car’s beauty and the seller’s trustworthiness. With @johnnyb11 noting its low mileage and stick shift, many comments praised the vehicle's overall appeal and the quality of its manual conversion. Furthermore, @Goldstein (The Seller) was proactive in addressing inquiries, sharing details about the car's parts and mechanics, which visibly impressed potential buyers like @zech265 who acknowledged the thoroughness of the information provided.
Neutral: Comments from various users sought clarification on additional specifications and history. @Nolyaw and @jmorin specifically inquired about whether the E-diff functions were retained in the conversion, which @Goldstein (The Seller) confirmed was deleted, while offering to include all components should the new owner want to restore that function. There were practical questions regarding the car's service history and specifics on the exhaust system, with @badcad and @husseys contributing thoughts about market value and car condition, thereby maintaining a balanced tone throughout the discussion.
Negative: Concerns were raised by several users regarding the car's conversion and potential long-term implications. @mike_747 pointed out the high cost of exhaust headers and questioned the car's previous repairs, while @ddipaolo12 highlighted uncertainties about paint damage and imperfections. @Nolyaw showed disappointment over the deletion of the E-diff system, suggesting that it was a loss for performance. @zech265's probing questions further underscored worries about the vehicle's maintenance and potential future costs associated with its converted setup.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the 1965 Ford Mustang, noting its classic condition and nostalgic value. @3Pedalonly shared how the car made him feel reminiscent of his childhood, while @keith_k mentioned its comparable attributes to his aunt's long-held Mustang, emphasizing its aesthetic appeal. @Countrysquire praised the tough Rangoon Red color and appreciated the car's vintage significance, suggesting it represents a simpler time in automotive history that resonates deeply with enthusiasts.
Neutral: The discussion highlighted numerous aspects of the car's specifications and history, with various commenters raising questions about certain details. @Fireballone_1 sought clarification on the term 'BAT' related to the wheels, and @canponcho questioned the accuracy of the chassis number listed. @David_C remarked on the preservation of the car in low-level spec, while others like @crsarvey noted the importance of documenting the mileage. The dialogue also addressed casual comments about standard features and options available during the car's production year, fostering an informative discussion among commenters.
Negative: Conversely, some commenters expressed concerns regarding the authenticity and completeness of the vehicle. @Countrysquire pointed out missing original parts and suggested that the car might have undergone refreshment that compromised its value. @Dwait remarked about the potential discrepancy in the car's mileage, challenging the assertion that it has only 5,000 miles. Additionally, @neilpierson25 commented on how the replacement of original components impacted the car's value, suggesting that while it might be in running order, it might lack collectible integrity. Overall, a concern for originality and the 'damage' done by replacing parts was a recurring theme in negative comments.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic and specifications. Commenters like @MikeMaurer highlighted the attention to detail, praising the black wheels and black calipers combined with the distinctive blue interior stitching. @Oziris described the seller as credible and knowledgeable, reinforcing confidence in the acquisition process. Additionally, @FatDaddyT referred to the car as 'sexy,' further emphasizing the positive reception regarding its design and specifications.
Neutral: Several participants expressed curiosity about the vehicle's features and options, with @zman4321 raising a concern about the lack of rear seats in GT3 models, which they found disappointing for family needs. @MattsMistakes46 provided clarification about seating configurations, indicating that the rear seat option is available in the touring variant. The seller emphasized their extensive experience in representing Porsche vehicles and addressed various inquiries about the car's condition and modifications, ensuring transparency in the auction process.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns regarding the modifications made to the vehicle. @tygar78 sought clarification about an aftermarket exhaust that was previously installed, highlighting the issue of exclusions in the sale. Meanwhile, @porsche1986 criticized local dealerships for hoarding GT3 allocations for profit, reflecting broader dissatisfaction with market practices. These concerns reflect a sense of caution among potential buyers regarding aftermarket modifications and the general marketplace dynamics.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the 2000 Honda S2000, highlighting its low mileage and driving experience. @bhhumphrey notes how it averages less than 1,000 miles per year across its four owners, emphasizing that these cars are meant to be enjoyed rather than just stored in a garage. @japans2k also praises the vehicle, stating it's their favorite Honda sports car and appreciates its performance, considering it well-built and incredibly fun to drive.
Neutral: Several inquiries are made about the car’s condition and history, revealing a desire for transparency regarding its maintenance and usage. @AmericanQuality raises questions about possible paint imperfections, residue from detailing, and includes a request for clarification about the vehicle's tonneau cover and key situation. @flys2k seeks information about the ownership history and service records, particularly focusing on the discrepancies in mileage reported over the years, indicating a cautious yet interested perspective.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the aesthetic condition of the car. @AmericanQuality pointed out a significant amount of white residue on the paint in specific photographs, questioning if it was just wax or if there were underlying paint imperfections. Additionally, @Ya-Man suggests that the previous owners did not utilize the vehicle to its full potential, hinting at a missed opportunity to enjoy its performance fully. This reflects a sense of disappointment regarding how the car may have been treated in its past ownership.
|
 |
Positive: @WoodrowWilson describes the vehicle as a beautiful low miles C8 with a great color combination, expressing optimism that the auction will do well and wishing good luck. @briman130 mentions that although the build is conservative, it may represent a great value for a Z06. Overall, there are sentiments of excitement and appreciation for the car's aesthetics and potential.
Neutral: @manofmanuals shares their opinion on the current market, estimating the vehicle's value at $105k. Meanwhile, @Dan notes that the manufacturer's suggested retail price (MSRP) was $130k and suggests that the auction should aim to get close to that figure, with both likening it to recent auction values. @SopwithTriplane engages with this point by questioning the relevance of MSRP compared to current market trends, implying that recent auctions suggest a market value around $95k.
Negative: There are some concerns expressed about the auction's activity, with @badcad noting that there has been a lack of comments for the Z06, which might indicate uncertainty or hesitation from potential bidders. @NaplesLuxuryCars humorously suggests that they hope to purchase the car for $30k, reflecting skepticism about the auction's competitiveness. @HotVette adds to this sentiment by joking about the bidding timeline extending to 2027, indicating a perception of limited interest or high reserves in the current auction environment.
|
|
|