Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: Commentors like @Dollycat3 and @boaboyoz highlight the exceptional quality and historical significance of the 1955 EMW 327 Sport Cabriolet, noting its stylish design and luxurious interior. @RedRon expresses appreciation for the educational content found on BaT, celebrating the intricate automotive history surrounding the EMW brand. Many commentators find the vehicle fascinating, with @AJR3001 acknowledging its rarity and @Button commenting on its German elegance, which underscores its status as a coveted collector's item.
Neutral: Several users share a curiosity about the vehicle's history and technical specifications. @alaskossie raises an inquiry about the accuracy of the BMW roundel on the vehicle, while @Johnnbee113 offers a personal anecdote connecting his father to a similar car of much older manufacture. Additionally, @Shawnking provides details about the production history of the car, indicating that its design and mechanics are closely tied to both pre-war and post-war influences, while addressing variations in features between different production runs.
Negative: Not all commentary is entirely favorable. Some users, like @Johnnybee113, challenge the authenticity of the year of the car, suggesting it may not actually be a 1955 model. @Dake humorously points out a typo, while @VWP-Nut prompts questions about practical features such as trunk accessibility, suggesting a level of criticism regarding the car's usability. @Dsm1465's inquiry into tire age implies concerns about maintenance and safety, reflecting an understanding that not all aspects may be in perfect condition.
 |
 |
Positive: @actonautoboutique (The Seller) expressed gratitude for the early bids on the auction for the rare 964 Carrera 4 Widebody, highlighting the car's originality and the joy the current owner has experienced driving it since 2002. @christopherdelo praised their experience with Acton Auto Boutique during past transactions, suggesting confidence in bidding on the vehicle. Additional comments from @JeremyL. provided a positive perspective on the car's color, stating it is unique and beautiful, and he highly recommends it as one of his favorite 911s.
Neutral: Several commenters noted their observations regarding the vehicle’s paint condition, particularly focusing on areas with different color tones. @KStad shared information about the factory hip protectors, while @beckseuropean suggested that the discoloration comes from yellowed PPF, which could be addressed with repainting. @actonautoboutique (The Seller) confirmed these assessments and offered transparency about the vehicle’s history and condition throughout the discussion.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle’s condition, with @esy0345 questioning the color mismatch on the driver’s rear fender cover and inquiring if it could be fixed before the auction ends. Additionally, @NHPiper asked about the cost to repair a potential timing chain cover leak, with @msolei bringing up the need for a top-end rebuild if the engine is being removed. These comments, along with inquiries about service costs, reflect some apprehension regarding the vehicle's maintenance needs as the auction progresses.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are highly enthusiastic about the vehicle, praising its striking livery and overall appearance. @Ford_Fan531 describes it as bold and awesome, while @GDogg simply declares it as absolutely 'BODACIOUS.' @Team_Phenix shares their firsthand experience racing against the car, complimenting its meticulous maintenance and speed, further noting the impressive spare parts package. Many agree that the colorful design makes it a standout on the track, with @HMW citing its purpose as a visually striking vehicle to spot in races. @boaboyoz expresses excitement about the car's wicked cool look and speed, making it clear that this edition of the GT3 Cup is irresistible to motorsport enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the technical aspects of the vehicle, including the longevity of its parts and history. @Rkeating and @skonker discuss the engine and transmission hours, with @NielsM providing context on the car's maintenance and spare parts, clarifying that the car has had minimal run time since ownership changes. Commenters highlight the quality and care behind the vehicle's maintenance, with @ottocarclub (The Seller) noting that it remains in excellent condition with no evident damage despite its racing history. The conversation also touches on general speculation about engine rebuild timings and spares, which prompts others to seek further clarification.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns or skepticism regarding the car's history and condition. @trlbms asks about any significant damage history, indicating a cautious approach to potential buyers. @Redlinedp queries the reasoning behind the extensive spare parts package, hinting at possible prior incidents. Moreover, @Brookfieldnest raises questions about the engine rebuilds, reflecting uncertainty about the vehicle's performance reliability. Such inquiries suggest a level of apprehension among potential buyers, who seek assurance despite the vehicle's accolades.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the striking visual appeal of the Speed Yellow color on the Ford GT, with @boaboyoz describing it as a "bad a$ bumblebee" and @michaelmotorcar noting that arriving at car shows in a yellow/black GT guarantees attention and admiration. Enthusiasts appreciate the color scheme and the car's rarity, with @ext pointing out that only 171 units were produced in this color. The seller, @FinestVehiclesTraded, expresses gratitude for the positive feedback and describes the car as a joy to drive while inviting potential buyers to view the vehicle in person.
Neutral: Several comments reflect on the bidding process and the value of the vehicle, with @Ranchero65 and @rlarsen462 discussing the competitive bids and their implications. @Tripletail shares positive experiences with the seller, emphasizing the quality of cars available, while @Mrdougie refers to the low mileage of the car as a potentially great investment. The seller remains engaged with bidders, providing updates and encouraging questions, enhancing the auction experience.
Negative: There are some minor critiques regarding the presentation of the vehicle, with @Art138 suggesting that the walk-around video had too much artificial enhancement and that natural visuals would better showcase the car's beauty. Additionally, there seems to be a concern from potential bidders about the seriousness of the auction process, as @rlarsen462 questions whether people commit to bids without genuine intent, implying a small degree of skepticism regarding the bidding actions. Overall, this concern presents a slight negativity amidst an otherwise overwhelmingly positive reception.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their excitement and nostalgia about the vehicle, with @MoparisKing even referencing the classic movie 'Back to the Future' by saying 'McFry!' and @CarDogThreePedals humorously suggesting that this truck doesn't need roads where it's going. @Paddock praised it with 'Looks Great!!! Good Luck,' while @Inthesaddle noted, 'Wow, this is a super fun listing.' The overall sentiment celebrated the truck's aesthetic and its impact, drawing connections to beloved pop culture.
Neutral: Several questions and comments from potential buyers indicated a desire for more information about the vehicle's condition and history. For instance, @Idavidsheldon inquired about issues beyond the stereo and rear window, prompting the seller, @Shyanne, to clarify the vehicle's history and current state. Questions about the restoration process and authenticity were raised by users like @NaturopathicDoctor, showing that while there is excitement, there are also practical concerns about the purchase.
Negative: However, some negativity emerged, primarily from @firefighter17 and others who felt that certain comments and questions were not constructive or too probing regarding the reserve price. @Idavidsheldon also questioned the vehicle's authenticity, noting that it appears to be a replica, which led to some disappointment among those who may have been hoping for an original vehicle from the film. Additionally, @HotVette had a comment flagged for being non-constructive, indicating a rift in the community's interaction surrounding the listing.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the impressive specifications of the Black on Black Panamera 4S Executive, noted for its low mileage and well-documented service history through Porsche. @RickyJDM emphasizes the vehicle has been meticulously maintained, with timely oil changes and recent recall fixes, contributing to its excellent condition. Additionally, the comments convey excitement and admiration for the car's features, such as the low road noise experienced during a high-speed drive, showcasing its luxurious aspects and making it an appealing choice for potential buyers.
Neutral: Some comments raise questions regarding the vehicle's history, particularly if it had been used as a loaner car at the dealership. @Vw.dodge questions the mileage recorded on the car while at the dealership. @RickyJDM responds by confirming there is no evidence it was a loaner and offers reassurance about the vehicle's overall condition, including the absence of odors and the like-new quality of the leather interior. There's also a mention of potential concerns about minor quirks or imperfections, showcasing a level of due diligence from prospective buyers.
Negative: Certain comments express concern regarding the car's previous dealership usage and whether any hidden issues might exist. @Vw.dodge asks about possible marks or quirks that could affect value, indicating a cautious approach from some potential buyers. Though @RickyJDM has reassured the condition and addressed previous concerns, the discussions imply that there is still some apprehensiveness about fully trusting a seller's claims, especially in a high-value transaction like this.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the modifications made to the vehicle, highlighting elements such as the tasteful design and attention to detail. @MNberg mentioned it was 'Very nicely and tastefully done,' while @SwiftFF5 was similarly impressed by the quality of the build. @Dan_M. specifically praised the integration of a modern A/C unit with the alum radiator and the appealing color combination, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. The overall consensus from various commenters acknowledged the car's visual appeal as a 'fun car' and appreciated features like the chic willow green color, suggesting it was a well-executed project that could add joy to long road trips.
Neutral: Some users brought up constructive criticisms and suggestions for improvement without completely negating the positives of the vehicle. Commenters like @Fuego and @ForzaMinardi pointed out that the front end seemed unusual or lacking some visual interest, suggesting modifications like adding a motif bar or revisiting the grille design for a more appealing look. @Descanuck raised questions about the gas shocks and the retainment of the Stromberg carburetors, asking for insights that could inform potential buyers about their functionality and maintenance. Meanwhile, others like @Capt._Doug noted that while the modifications may not appeal to all Jaguar enthusiasts, they still acknowledge the craftsmanship behind the changes, suggesting a balance of original and modified attributes.
Negative: A number of users voiced specific concerns about various aspects of the vehicle's finish and functionality. @MGB6 and others pointed out the absence of essential rubber seals around headlights, tail lights, and door frames, questioning whether this was an oversight for better door fit or an indication of incomplete restoration. The alignment of the tail lights was also a notable contention, with @BloodyHell identifying uneven placements that detracted from the overall aesthetic. Detractors like @KarmannG2109 expressed disappointment that the modifications did not enhance the original design, stating that in their opinion, the alterations failed to improve upon what was already near perfection. Some commenters echoed concerns about structural integrity and parts that were missing, with suggestions for upgrades and repairs necessary to maintain the concept of a classic car that many hold sacred.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the Maxton vehicle's unique features and driving experience. @RedRider48 noted that the car would spark interesting conversations at local car events, while @SwiftFF5 reminisced about Bob Sutherland's impressive collection and showed a desire to drive the car. @abarthbill praised the vehicle's fun driving dynamics and likened its handling to that of a Formula Ford. Comments also highlighted the engaging nature of the rotary engine, with @Mike_Breinin and @Frank_Barrett emphasizing how enjoyable the ride is, suggesting it offers almost unrivaled fun while driving.
Neutral: The seller, @Bulletmotorsportsinc, provided comprehensive information about the auction process and answered questions from potential buyers efficiently. They encouraged bidders to view detailed videos of the car and offered insights about shipping and financing options. Several commenters, including @Timonaut and @ch_sutherland, shared historical context and technical details about the Maxton, helping to establish a background for those less familiar with the vehicle. Alongside those technical discussions, some comments raised inquiries about specific features or past auction records, demonstrating the interest in the vehicle's authenticity and modifications.
Negative: A few commenters raised concerns about specific aspects of the car. @arpieb and @Timonaut noted inconsistencies in the paint job and horsepower claims, suggesting a need for verification through a dyno run. @70Silver pointed out issues related to the fit of the lower panels of the car, expressing skepticism about the vehicle's condition since the last auction, while also inquiring if any work had been done. @Vetatur_fumare suggested that the new owner should repaint the vehicle's lower half to restore its iconic aesthetic. Overall, while the vehicle garnered significant admiration, these concerns highlighted a caution among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Mieling (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm for the truck, highlighting that it is a super clean 2 owner vehicle from 1995 with a lot of service history available in the Carfax. They mention putting 8,000 trouble-free miles on it and believe that the next owner will enjoy driving it for another 100,000 miles. The Seller encourages potential buyers to reach out with any questions or concerns, indicating a willingness to assist interested parties.
Neutral: @skoshred asks how to contact the Seller directly, suggesting a level of interest but no strong opinions expressed about the truck itself. Additionally, @Mieling clarifies that there was a misunderstanding regarding the number of owners; the truck is actually only a 2 owner vehicle, emphasizing their role in putting miles on it while keeping it titled in the previous owner’s name.
Negative: There are no negative comments about the vehicle noted in the provided excerpts.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's Arena Red color, which is described as fantastic and glorious by @McFood and @turblowed, respectively. The seller, @pfatt2, is commended for the extensive maintenance and repairs he has performed, with @ceovirus appreciating the seller's honesty regarding the car's condition and the work done to sort it out. The overall sentiment is that despite being 26 years old, the car is clean and beautiful, with one user noting that it runs great after the replacements and repairs.
Neutral: There are inquiries about the car's condition, such as @bmchan asking about the airbag light and @HockeyMars inquiring about the IMS bearing status. @pfatt2 provides detailed responses about the fixes made, including replacing the airbag's issue and reassuring that the car is built with a dual-row IMS bearing, thereby alleviating concerns. Additionally, some comments address aspects of the car visually, like @RWD-FTW questioning the color and @turblowed redirecting toward the car's true appearance, suggesting lighting may affect perception.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's vinyl window, with @Browett expressing doubts regarding its condition and potential rain leaks. @RWD-FTW provocatively suggests that the car's color may appear pink rather than red, indicating a lack of admiration for the stunning hue others see. Lastly, @Johnpig questions the seller's reasoning for a quick sale after only a few months, suggesting skepticism about the transaction, which @pfatt2 addresses by explaining the nature of his business.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors like @drjaybdmd and @RadBarchetta express optimism about the vehicle, noting it appears solid and is a decent restoration candidate despite having a few incorrect parts. @AuctionJunkie shares a positive personal experience with their own GT6+, emphasizing the availability of parts and the joy of ownership over the years. Many viewers, including @mgarvey661, reminisce about their fond memories associated with these cars, reflecting a collective appreciation for the GT6.
Neutral: Commentor @mrloser (The Seller) provides detailed insights into the car's condition, mentioning that while the car runs, it requires some repairs before it's fully roadworthy, including addressing electrical issues and tuning the carburetors. Commentors like @Cmara and @mmatera engage in discussions about the differences between car models, demonstrating a shared interest in the specifics of the vehicle's design and parts. The car is acknowledged as a project vehicle, with potential for those interested in restoration or modifications.
Negative: Several comments point out the challenges associated with the vehicle, particularly concerning body rust and the need for multiple repairs to make it driveable. @JD58 describes the condition as having surface rust and pitting, while @sixxpack highlights the difficulties of restoring these cars. The overall sentiment suggests that while the car has potential, it will require substantial work to bring it back to a fully functional state.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters have praised the overall reliability of the Toyota 5.7L V8 engine, suggesting that with proper maintenance, it can last a long time, often exceeding 300,000 to 500,000 miles. @HairOnFire highlighted that the engine is considered highly durable, noting that rod bearing failures are not common and typically occur due to owner-specific factors. @Truxton expressed confidence that this particular engine, after undergoing a rebuild and proper maintenance, should last the new owner many years, complimenting the work done by the seller on the frame and rust prevention.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle also expressed curiosity and a desire for more information about the engine replacement. @KROD and @almiami requested specifics about the engine's history, including whether it was new or rebuilt and details about the warranty. @dynotune (The Seller) clarified that the engine was replaced with a rebuilt long block after the previous owner opted to not repair it, emphasizing that all necessary precautions were taken to ensure no debris would be introduced into the new engine.
Negative: Conversely, there were concerns raised about engine reliability in the newer models, with @yorkag mentioning a car nut's observations regarding machining debris causing engine issues in models from 2020 to 2024. Additionally, @GSNOKES43 critiqued the aesthetic approach to repairs made on the frame, likening it to artwork rather than functional maintenance. Overall, doubts about this particular vehicle's past and the nature of its engine failure were expressed by several users, with a focus on whether prior negligence played a role in the engine's issues.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors such as @JoeMommia and @Tahoe013 praised the vehicle for its impressive build and aesthetics, highlighting features like the powerful engine and unique color scheme. @BloodyHell noted that the Mustang is greater than the sum of its parts and expressed love for the cars design and functionality. The seller, @flowhausinc, also received positive feedback for their engagement and willingness to answer questions throughout the auction process, showcasing a commitment to customer service.
Neutral: Some comments from users like @HotRod_Ford provided valuable technical details about the vehicle’s build, specifically correcting misconceptions about the rear-end suspension design. Others, like @Fordfirst and @Marcher6, inquired about specific features of the vehicle, such as the exhaust routing and the fuel cell access, which were informative but did not reflect strong opinions on the car's appeal. The car’s performance specifications were also discussed, with questions about the dyno sheet and engine horsepower being raised without negative implications.
Negative: On the flip side, some users like @19Must68Ang criticized the vehicle's color choice and wheel/tire combination, suggesting that there are better options available. @Gyrofreak's inquiry about the dyno sheet pointed to a potential lack of available performance data, which may concern some prospective buyers. Additionally, @baysfull expressed a disapproval of certain design elements, mentioning that a cowl hood seemed out of place, which portrays mixed feelings about the modifications made on the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed deep admiration for the 1990 Honda Accord LX Coupe, highlighting its low mileage and manual transmission as significant advantages. @Wantavant showcased excitement with emojis, while @Yamadude68 noted the car's appeal from its original release in 1990, suggesting that its low mileage and manual transmission likely contributed to its inclusion on the Bring a Trailer auction site. @PGT_FTW affirmed the car's impressive condition, referring to it as a "terrific" vehicle and others such as @JaDawgPNW and @Crosscountry echoed sentiments of astonishment and praise for this classic Honda. The seller, @PreludeDude, further emphasized the vehicle's exquisite "Charcoal Granite Metallic" color, asserting it was exceptional in person with a full paint correction and ceramic coating done recently.
Neutral: Commenters also shared general sentiments about the vehicle, acknowledging its remarkable condition as a classic car. @SWells679 raised an interesting point about personal aesthetics regarding the wheels, suggesting they might look better with the original OEM steel wheels. @Caymanorcarrera noted a drawback with the vehicle's motorized seatbelts, indicating a desire for a different design. @Kenny360 discussed the engineering simplicity of the car, highlighting the reliability of its single overhead cam engine and non-VTEC setup which contributes to fewer potential failure points. @Cneezy814 inquired about the timing belt replacement, displaying an interest in the vehicle's maintenance history, while also pointing to the high-standard documentation provided by the seller.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming praise, a few negative comments emerged about certain aspects of the vehicle. @MrRenrut referenced the motorized seatbelts as a problematic feature, which impacted their overall experience with the car. Similarly, @sjgnyc recalled minor issues from their past ownership of a similar model, such as water leaks and occasional vapor lock, expressing a sense of nostalgia mixed with apprehension. @Cneezy814 also pointed out uncertainty regarding the timing belt's documentation, indicating potential doubts about the car's maintenance history. Overall, the negative comments hint at common aging issues found in older vehicles, which some potential buyers may find concerning.
|
 |
Positive: @Cambiker011 described the car as awesome, particularly praising the turbo wheels. @Airliner1 echoed this sentiment, calling the car gorgeous and noting the appeal of the Turbo wheels, although lamenting the scarcity of manual versions. @bradnic shared that he had the exact wheels and color combo in a manual vehicle, expressing fondness for widebody designs. @jjking22 complimented the color combination and options, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @tomcolt3 praised the interior color choice, remarking that it was well done and aesthetically pleasing. @Bonanzajock concurred about the importance of a dark dash to minimize glare, while @MattyGatch highlighted the vehicle’s near-perfect specifications, praising the inclusion of paddle shifters. @Seaate20 contrasted the PDK with manual transmissions, suggesting the PDK enhances performance. @Poacb shared a positive personal experience with a similar vehicle, wishing the seller well.
Neutral: @nlips (The Seller) addressed a concern about the trunk latch, confirming that it has been replaced. @Keenish asked for service records and additional information about the vehicle, to which @nlips responded that they only have what is listed on the Carfax. @Hampton5 noted the absence of mention regarding a sports exhaust, while @DBSValley pointed out the presence of a PSE button in the car. @mdu911sc commented on the vehicle's Certified Pre-Owned status, referencing its history and the durability of similar models. @Denniec reassured that any potential rust issues would stem from fasteners, specifically undercarriage components, rather than main vehicle structures. @ArturTN inquired about inconsistencies in the tire brands, seeking clarification from the seller.
Negative: @richbob's comments were flagged as non-constructive, as were several others that expressed skepticism without providing specific critiques. @QS51 raised a valid point about the trunk latch not functioning correctly, referencing an audible issue in the provided video. @OttoBozart related rust concerns to the engine and exhaust condition, suggesting a decline in their appearance, while @DBSValley questioned the visual integrity of the wheels and the potential for touch-up paint, hinting at previous mishandling. Issues regarding mismatched tires were also raised, indicating further points of concern about the vehicle's maintenance and history.
|
 |
Positive: @BMWE90Guy remarked that driving this vehicle when it was new made one feel like a boss, highlighting the prestige associated with it. @Noisyboyz complimented the aesthetic appeal of the cream beige interior in contrast to the subdued blue exterior, noting the shiny wheels enhance the overall look. Additionally, @Dollycat3 described the car as absolutely beautiful with low mileage and a specific praise for the Diamond Blue Metallic finish, indicating a strong appreciation for the car's appearance.
Neutral: @gdinla (The Seller) provided information about the car's current excellent condition, noting it has been garaged and has service receipts from 2023. In response to @73carnut's inquiries about the age of the tires and various functions of the vehicle, the seller confirmed that while everything is functioning, the alarm is disabled and the remote key fobs do not work. @Dean_Laumbach shared positive insights about the vehicle's condition, emphasizing its exceptional cosmetic appearance despite acknowledging that older cars may have pending mechanical needs, showcasing a balanced perspective on the car's status.
Negative: @73carnut raised concerns over the lack of information regarding the age of the tires and hardtop stand, suggesting potential oversight on essential details. @Ebagi's comment was flagged as non-constructive, reflecting a warning about negativity in the discussion. @EricEAC questioned the stance of the car, suggesting it looked a bit low in the rear, which may imply issues with the rear suspension, while @marticulous inquired about the presence of a dashboard cover, hinting at possible concerns regarding the car's upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: @alfriedesq praises the car's stunning appearance and classy color, especially noting the lack of shields. @redbird1973 expresses excitement about the car's maintenance and spec, highlighting it as a great option for a first Ferrari. @Tonyz_ appreciates the simple and elegant specification of the 360, which stands out among modern Ferraris. @clearcutworld also adds that the seller has been very transparent with the car's records, suggesting that it has been well cared for throughout its life. Overall, the comments reflect a general admiration for the aesthetic qualities and maintenance history of the vehicle.
Neutral: @WestsideCCS (The Seller) provides detailed insights into the car, mentioning that it has been well maintained and cared for, with an offer for potential buyers to view the car prior to bidding. The seller clarifies that while the bumper has minor alignment issues, there are no records of an accident, and any repairs done were due to perfectionist ownership. @MGVII raises a couple of inquiries regarding the car's maintenance and condition, such as the gap in the bumper fitment and the history of the lower control arms, demonstrating curiosity about the vehicle's condition without casting doubt on its overall quality.
Negative: Some comments express concerns or inquiries about potential issues with the car. @MGVII questions the fitment gap and has concerns about the paintwork on the front end, hinting at possible underlying problems. There are also doubts about the electrical history brought up by @MGVII and whether the service records truly represent the car's history. @ampeng remarks on the considerable costs associated with maintaining such a vehicle, indicating that while the car is well-kept, significant investment is expected. @MGVII's inquiries about the clutch and alignment indicate a desire for reassurance about the car's overall reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @mikeeby expressed admiration for the car, stating it's beautiful. Additionally, @gord26 commented that the car checks all the right boxes and should fetch strong money, indicating a strong appeal in the marketplace. Many users appreciated elements like the solid build, correct wheels, and a deluxe interior, mentioning that the car is a nice-looking driver with good potential value due to its features.
Neutral: Several commentators provided observations about the vehicle's specifications and history. @rngilliland shared insights on the engine's horsepower and configuration, noting that it likely has the W72 package due to its VIN. Insights were also provided by @Ik54 on some discrepancies related to the model year indicators of the hood bird and the exhaust system, while @goforit69 raised a question about the originality of the mileage. Comments seemed to focus on clarifying the vehicle's attributes rather than expressing significant opinions about its desirability.
Negative: Concerns were raised about specific details that detracted from the vehicle's overall presentation. @Whatsupwidat questioned the odd appearance of a particular picture, and @Bruno417 noted that the shaker top does not fit correctly on the air cleaner base. @Myclassicrides highlighted the importance of matching the correct hood bird style, suggesting that the current one may not be appropriate. Additionally, @IK54 pointed out the absence of air conditioning, questioning why certain factory features were missing, which may influence buyer perceptions negatively.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the vehicle's strong maintenance record and its appeal as a well-preserved classic. @Mcfly1985 (The Seller) emphasizes that the Lexus has been a one-owner vehicle, dealer maintained, and kept in excellent condition, describing it as a 'garage queen.' Commenters like @KZN185Surf praise the quality of the auction, indicating trust in the seller's efforts to present the vehicle accurately. The repainting due to vandalism is seen as a non-issue since the seller provides documented proof and clarity about the vehicle's condition, further reassuring potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments brought up questions regarding the vehicle's history and condition, such as the repainting's specifics and the current state of interior features like the seats and timing belt. @U0NLYLV4N0W mentions the need for the driver's seat to be refreshed and expresses curiosity about the maintenance details, including the timing belt service and overall service records. @Skelter55 and @Rudog ask for more thorough inspection details and photos of the undercarriage, highlighting common concerns buyers have for older vehicles without direct access for inspection.
Negative: Comments also reveal some concerns regarding the vehicle's repainting and maintenance history. @kcmbat questions the potential reasons for the repaint, suggesting there may be historical issues that aren't fully addressed. Additionally, @ingenierocivil points out an unaddressed recall associated with the vehicle's VIN, raising red flags about potentially critical safety aspects. @U0NLYLV4N0W and others express wariness about the implications of re-painting and maintenance, indicating they need further reassurance before committing.
|
35-Years-Family-Owned, 350-Powered 1961 GMC 1000 Wide-Side Pickup
1001CN12922A
Lot 233244
Private Party
 |
Positive: @59Biscayne praised the vehicle as a perfect build, highlighting its great color choice and meticulous details in exhaust, motor, and transmission. They expressed admiration for the quality of the vehicle and mentioned they would enjoy owning it if they had the funds. @DanielWebber also shared a heartfelt sentiment, reminiscing about their past GMC pickups and expressing a longing for the model being auctioned. Additionally, @MarkNeely acknowledged the truck's aesthetics and commented on its appealing design while wishing the seller luck with the auction.
Neutral: @CollinBromley (The Seller) clarified @Tonanzintla's comment about patina, suggesting that there may have been a misinterpretation regarding the authenticity of the vehicle's finish. They provided insight into specific modifications made to the truck, such as the choice of interior hooks for holding items down and explaining the absence of holes in the truck's design. Other commenters sought details about the truck's fuel pump location and heat management, leading to further engagement and clarification from the seller regarding the vehicle's features.
Negative: @Tonanzintla's comment suggested a critical view regarding the absence of curated patina, implying that this could detract from the truck's value. @gord26 raised questions about the placement of the fuel pump and its performance under heat, indicating potential concerns about the vehicle's functionality. This commentary hints at a degree of skepticism about the truck's modifications and overall reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @overlandish expressed enthusiasm about acquiring the Honda Motocompo, as it serves as a perfect compromise between his wife's desire for new luggage and his wish for a fun new toy. @onlyhonda4me highlighted the unique and appealing design of the original Motocompo, while also sharing excitement about their collection that includes a rare white Motocompo and a new 'Motocompacto' for display. @slim_jimmy7 shared satisfaction with their yellow Motocompo, indicating they are enhancing it with a 12V conversion for better reliability and brighter headlights, reflecting the general appeal and fascination with these quirky vehicles.
Neutral: @regguygarage (The Seller) provided information and context about the Honda Motocompo, encouraging questions and highlighting its fun and collectible nature. @thkfast and @Rmuw5729 discussed the top speeds of both the original and newer Motocompacto models, which opened up a conversation about performance attributes. The seller, @regguygarage, addressed inquiries about shipping safety measures and transport arrangements, emphasizing the Motocompo's design that facilitates easy transport, adding more informative depth to potential buyers' concerns.
Negative: @GaryTheBadger raised concerns regarding the safe packaging and shipping of the vehicle, sharing past negative experiences with bike shipping and requesting assurance from the seller. While the seller assured efforts to provide secure packaging, such worries about shipping safety hint at potential complications that prospective buyers might face. The urgency expressed by @onlyhonda4me about the auction's conclusion also suggests a sense of competitive tension among bidders, which could lead to dissatisfaction if expectations are not met.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is positively received by commenters who describe it as an "adorably awesome Acty Fire Truck" (@boaboyoz) and commend its overall appearance, with one user expressing their excitement for the truck by stating it looks awesome (@JustinNunez). The seller, @TokyoMotorsDC, is responsive to the potential buyers, providing detailed information regarding the truck's features and functionality, indicating the pump works great, although they lack a demonstration source.
Neutral: Several commenters have inquiries regarding the truck's specifications and operational capabilities. @muellerw1 requests a video demonstration of the pump in action, emphasizing the importance of understanding the truck's functionality, especially since it would be used for fire protection. @Dnesmith asks about the water capacity of the vehicle, seeking reassurance before considering a bid, while @mwillinger clarifies that the vehicle does not have onboard water storage and is instead intended to pump water from an external source. @TokyoMotorsDC confirms this, aiming to clear up any misconceptions about the truck's design.
Negative: On a less positive note, @Dnesmith expresses disappointment after realizing the truck does not come with an onboard water tank, stating that the unit is "useless" for their needs. This sentiment reflects a concern that potential buyers may have regarding the limitations of the vehicle's capabilities. @muellerw1 also highlights a possible concern regarding starting the rabbit pumps without primer water, which could lead to potential damage, underscoring the need for further clarity and trust in the truck's functionality.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and originality. @CalifOldGuy described it as 'Very nice!!!' while @CarFoolLane appreciated the Ford automatic floor shifters, referencing their nostalgic connection to Mustangs of the same era. @Reno_Rambler called it 'What a Beauty!', and @Acorn19 shared their enthusiasm as a long-time fan of the 66-67 Fairlane GTs, indicating that this particular car is particularly appealing.
Neutral: Several participants sought further information regarding the vehicle's condition and features. @tim49 inquired about the operational status of various components such as lights, wipers, and the radio. @Hootowl expressed curiosity about the steering wheel specific to the GT model, while @yjBen requested videos showcasing the convertible top's operation and undercarriage. Additionally, the seller, @nscott111, responded to these inquiries, confirming that most lights worked but mentioned the radio was not functional and that the weather stripping could use replacement.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's condition and pricing. @68Z28 criticized the pricing, stating it was 'way out of line.' @Pheairo pointed out that the 66 Fairlanes did not come standard with disc brakes, implying potential concerns for future maintenance. Additionally, @Reno_Rambler asked about the 'flat spot' in acceleration and if the seller could create a video demonstrating this issue, while @AutoTechLLC provided technical background on steering wheels, indicating that the specifics of trim and accessories on this model could be unreliable due to their production history.
|
 |
Positive: @DolceClassico highlights the W212 E-Class as classy, sporty, and luxurious, emphasizing its reliability as one of the best generations. @gscharnagl expresses a fondness for the car's color and interior materials, noting that MB Tex wears better than leather. @PricklyPearAutoClub and @Charliedents both praise the E-Class, with the former calling it the most reliable Mercedes they have owned, while the latter reflects on the superiority of the 2010 E350 compared to other luxury SUVs.
Neutral: @mbheritage (The Seller) provides context about the vehicle being an extraordinary example with low mileage. The car was kept in excellent condition by the previous owner and is described as behaving as though it is still new, with a rare highly optioned 4MATIC specification. @mr_mike asks practical questions about the car's low mileage, potential service needs, and maintenance records, seeking reassurance regarding its condition and readiness for long trips.
Negative: @billyJOE47 raises concerns about the m272 engine’s reliability issues and questions the car’s history regarding those problems. However, @billyJOE47 also notes that the specific engine in this car may not have the same issues as earlier models. @jepca queries the availability of maintenance records, particularly concerning oil changes versus mileage, which suggests potential worries about the vehicle's upkeep over the years.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @lloyddon1, showcases a high level of confidence and transparency about the vehicle, emphasizing their stellar reputation with over 175 successful transactions on BAT and a five-star review on Google. The 1958 BMW Isetta 300 has undergone a ground-up restoration by a top restoration company, resulting in a vehicle that looks practically brand new. Multiple commenters have praised the car's condition, with @mbarney811 referring to it as a "nicely restored car," and @MikeV acknowledging the quality of the restoration work, further solidifying its value as a collector's item. Additionally, the seller assures buyers of the vehicle's operational reliability, stating it runs as designed and definitely turns heads after being tuned and serviced recently.
Neutral: Several inquiries about the Isetta's features and logistics were made by potential buyers, indicating a strong interest in the vehicle. @amanzino asked about the possibility of exporting the car overseas, and @ambitus1 inquired about whether the Isetta has reverse gear, to which @lloyddon1 confirmed it does. Additionally, @Bordeaux brought up a historical aspect of the Isetta's wipers, seeking clarification about its production changes, while @51North requested more photos of specific areas of the car. Such questions reflect the active engagement of interested bidders and the seller's willingness to assist them.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback, there were some criticisms noted, particularly from @mbarney811, who pointed out that the BMW emblem was mounted too high on the door. Also, @kazarbarzin requested driving videos to better understand the car's performance, hinting at some uncertainty among potential buyers about the vehicle's real-world operation. Additionally, some comments hinted at the complexity of insurance and ownership of such a unique classic, suggesting that while the restoration is impressive, the practical aspects of ownership may still concern some bidders.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its performance and reliability. @SlapshotRacing appreciates the car's rawness and the mix of colors, implying that its aesthetic is secondary to its driving capabilities. @jmesh shares a personal experience, emphasizing the thrill of its sound on the track. @cmknight (The Seller) describes the meticulous care and maintenance given to the vehicle, noting its successful racing history and recent updates to its components, which further enhances its reputation as a fast and enjoyable race car.
Neutral: There are several clarifications and inquiries regarding the car's details. @Greejeff initially questions the color of the car, which @cmknight (The Seller) confirms is black beneath its wrap. @Geoff911sc raises concerns about the engine hours, wanting confirmation that the 105 hours mentioned refers to the engine and not the entire car. @bash2020 asks a technical question about whether the car is equipped with ABS, indicating a thoughtful consideration of its features.
Negative: Some comments hint at concerns or skepticism regarding the vehicle's status. @Geoff911sc expresses doubt about the car having only 105 hours total, suggesting it is difficult to believe such low usage for a racetrack car. This skepticism implies there may be confusion about the car's history or specifications. There is also a subtle implication that while the car may perform impressively, its maintenance and condition should be scrutinized closely.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle show a strong sense of appreciation and nostalgia from various commenters. @DUGEEEFRESH04 finds the inline 5 engine cool and expresses enthusiasm for the listing. @notforhire shares their experience with a similar car and emphasizes that the 5-cylinder model is more than adequate, particularly praising its aesthetic appeal. @BMWE90Guy encapsulates the positive sentiment by calling it a 'Classic Volvo' while @KayCeeHay reminisces about their beloved first car, highlighting the exceptional features of the model being discussed. Additionally, @RBBGroup sees the vehicle as a promising candidate for a successful purchase experience, while @richard_cheney (The Seller) emphasizes its reliability and comfort for long drives, assuring potential buyers of its quality.
Neutral: Some comments present neutral observations, questioning details or emphasizing specific features of the vehicle. For instance, @DjTknew raises a query about rust in one of the pictures, while @elpasoben wonders about the timing of the belt replacement. @Schwedenstahl clarifies that the spare tire well doesn't show rust and assists in identifying rim details discussed by @KayCeeHay. There are also inquiries about the AC's functionality from @60vwbus and notes about the specific market approval status from @littledavid, which provide helpful but non-emotional information about the car.
Negative: Negative comments are largely absent; however, concerns about the vehicle's condition emerge through @DjTknew's rust inquiry. While @richard_cheney (The Seller) addresses this concern by assuring that the pictures reflect a clean spare tire well, there is always an underlying unease regarding potential mechanical issues, such as the clutch mentioned by @Old_Ned. Nevertheless, the seller's response seems to pacify those concerns, maintaining an overall positive and reassuring atmosphere surrounding the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed a strong appreciation for the vehicle's design and restoration, highlighting aspects such as the awesome color and build quality. @TBF3 called it a 'Very Cool Honda!', while @sperlz loved the build and color as well. Additionally, @Rico7500 praised the restoration efforts and remarked positively on the ride video, saying 'Love the ride video.' This sentiment was echoed by others who commented positively about the bike's appearance and functionality.
Neutral: The seller, @jwill214, provided various details about the bike, including a riding video, and engaged with potential buyers by answering specific questions. The seller addressed concerns raised by @zak123 regarding the ride video not working and uploaded a new version. They also provided answers to technical inquiries about fuel type and carburetors, clarifying that the bike runs on ethanol-free gas and operates with two Mikuni carbs feeding four cylinders. @Sernorman and @preez77 had a discussion regarding the carb setup and its advantages.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the bike's performance, specifically @dave_kentuckee's observation of a slight hesitation in the midrange, as seen in the riding video. The seller, @jwill214, responded by stating that he does not experience any stumbling while riding, attributing the perceived hesitation to external factors such as hitting a bump in the road. However, this suggests that not all viewers are convinced of the bike's flawless performance under all conditions.
|
 |
Positive: @matpatte believes Shortbox W150s are incredibly awesome, highlighting their appeal in the truck community. @OhioRoots10 also shares a positive sentiment, describing the truck as beautiful and wishing the seller good luck with the transaction. Furthermore, @mspaulding88 expresses nostalgia by recalling fond memories associated with similar vehicles, referencing their experience with a 1989 Dodge D150, which adds a personal touch to the admiration for the truck's design.
Neutral: @PaxtonShelby1 raises a question about the wheels, asking if they are F-150 wheels, indicating curiosity regarding the vehicle's specifications. @MikeDTaz also comments on the wheels, playfully questioning if all five are included and mentioning their resemblance to Alcoa wheels, which adds a neutral perspective on the truck's components.
Negative: There are no negative comments present regarding the vehicle. All responses lean toward either positive appreciation or neutral inquiries about specific features.
|
 |
Positive: @SalesAtMullen provided reassurance about the vehicle's maintenance, confirming that the timing belt, alternator belt, and A/C compressor drive belt have all been replaced, along with the water pump. The seller emphasizes the car's excellent condition, stating it has always been garaged and is currently in good running order. Additionally, they mentioned that the A/C is fully functional, providing cold temperatures, which adds to the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: @GeorgeAlfa3 inquired about the age of the tires and the A/C service history, raising practical questions about the vehicle's readiness for long drives. @SalesAtMullen responded, providing specific details about the tires' DOT date codes and confirming that they were replaced in 2011. While noting the overall condition of the tires and the functionality of the A/C, the seller indicated confidence in the vehicle's reliability for longer trips.
Negative: @noah300g expressed concern regarding the timing belt and its age, questioning whether it has ever been replaced or if it remains the original component. This highlights a common apprehension buyers might have about older vehicles regarding maintenance history. Further, while the seller has addressed these concerns, the initial query reflects a potential worry among prospective purchasers about the vehicle's longevity and operational readiness.
|
 |
Positive: @onlyhonda4me expressed the excitement about the potential fun the new owner could have with the vehicle, highlighting the overall enjoyment that comes with it. @adhamshata02 (The Seller) provided specific details about the repairs made to the car, assuring that all replaced parts were OEM and that the damage was cosmetic, which may reassure potential buyers about the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: @TreyRainey inquired about the differences between the Touring edition and a standard Type R, suggesting that there is interest in the features and specifications of the vehicle. @magicalmike asked about the tread on the tires, indicating a practical concern for maintenance and usability, while @Stumblingkarma expressed curiosity about the vehicle’s market value and mentioned considering selling their own car.
Negative: @Bulabista raised concerns about discrepancies found in the vehicle's history report, specifically questioning the incidents reported and their explanations. @NoYouJump1st asked for more information and pictures of the damage, which indicates a cautious approach to the vehicle's history. Overall, there seems to be a mix of excitement and skepticism surrounding the car.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters see the vehicle as a promising restoration project, appreciating its unique elements like the Dunstall cylinder and exhaust features. @MNberg noted that it starts well and only needs minor TLC, while @BikerBoyAZ acknowledged its strong performance aspects, emphasizing the quick acceleration and fun ride characteristics Nortons are known for. @JonHarrison highlighted the project nature of Nortons and deemed the Dunstall modifications a plus, suggesting a great opportunity for enthusiasts to restore a classic motorcycle.
Neutral: Several users inquired about various components of the motorcycle, with questions around the seat, exhaust pipes, and forks. @VDF1 (The Seller) clarified that the seat is a vintage Corbin aftermarket seat and that both exhaust pipes and cylinders are possibly Dunstall options. There seemed to be some confusion regarding the vehicle's model year and VIN, with discussions led by @Rorty4bikes and @NortonF1JPS, addressing the discrepancies in production dates and original specifications, indicating a collective effort to clarify the vehicle's history.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters pointed out significant concerns regarding the motorcycle's condition. @2hecknback described the oxidation and rust issues throughout the bike, pointing out the need for possible part replacements due to corrosion. @patjolson recounted a troubling personal experience indicating that the motorcycle could be challenging to handle. The general sentiment among some users suggests that while there are redeeming qualities, considerable work is required to bring the motorcycle back to good condition, as flagged by multiple users, including @Caferacerman, who noted structural repairs on the cylinder.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the impressive features and quality of the C8 Corvette being auctioned. @MSCLASSICCARSLLC, the seller, boasts about the car's excellent ownership history, stating it has only 4,500 original miles and is loaded with factory optional equipment. Commenters like @brad74 appreciate the car's stunning color combination and overall flawless condition. Many participants, including @BossPapa and @Toptime79, emphasize the desirability of the modded specs, noting the reputation of the upgrading shop, Cordes Performance, enhances the car's value. Overall, the car garners excitement for its unique build and aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions about the modifications done on the Corvette, with some clarity on horsepower gains being debated. @MSCLASSICCARSLLC provides insight into the car's performance, stating that the modifications yield approximately 100 extra horsepower beyond factory specs. Other users like @seems_lgt and @Blackbeard270 argue that advertised horsepower figures typically reflect crank power rather than wheel power, thus sparking extensive dialogue about the car's dyno results and the legitimacy of the modifications. Commenters share personal experiences and express curiosity about details like smog compliance and tuning options, demonstrating a balanced mix of interest and inquiries.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about the modifications and their implications for performance and resale value. @WTompkins questioned the accuracy of the dyno numbers, while @Azebb sarcastically suggested that spending $22k for minimal power gains seemed disproportionate. Commenters like @Noisyboyz pointed out that modern vehicles like the C8 come highly tuned from the factory, which makes significant power gains through modifications challenging. @sskinner, coming from California, expressed doubts about the vehicle's ability to pass state emissions tests, indicating a broader skepticism towards modified vehicles in that context, potentially affecting its appeal to certain buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @SamClassic commented positively on the vehicle's look, describing it as a great-looking 67XR7 and offering early congratulations to the winning bidder. @Rixx56 expressed a preference for the car without the black vinyl top and @Valiantjim shared a nostalgic experience of riding in a 1967 Cougar GT, highlighting the charm and aesthetic appeal of such classic muscle cars.
Neutral: @67XR7 (The Seller) provided detailed responses to inquiries, explaining the steering column and condition of the car. They indicated that while the steering changed to a non-tilt design, the columns and parts align with historic specifications. @CTYankee acknowledged details about the interior and parts compatibility with ’68 models and confirmed that the decorative trim pieces ahead of the rear wheel wells are typical for the '67 XR-7 package and are purely cosmetic.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the vehicle’s condition. @GaryCase noted that the reupholstered seats appeared rough, while @Jumpdunk pointed out bubbling rust issues around badges and rear deck areas. @dadlife questioned why there was significant overspray and requested evidence of the car's condition before paint work, indicating potential rust repair needs. @Cougar_Guy noted that parts of the back seat were not original to the XR7, suggesting that the interior had been altered from its original factory specifications.
|
 |
Positive: Comments appreciate the vehicle's stunning appearance and exclusivity, with @cardude76 expressing that it is a 'gorgeous car' and @theforce88 also calling it 'gorgeous' while wishing good luck to the seller. The vehicle is noted as a rare 1 of only 300 ever produced, and @calibermotorleasing highlights its condition as having only 374 miles, appealing to potential buyers with its uniqueness and high original MSRP of $583k. Several commentators, including @Leonard_Bayard, remark on the beauty and desirability of Aston Martin, indicating a strong fan base for the brand.
Neutral: A discussion regarding the vehicle's warranty is present, with @Garkmark inquiring if the car is still under factory warranty and @calibermotorleasing responding that they will confirm this shortly. @calibermotorleasing later provides assurance that it is indeed under warranty until January 2027. Additionally, there are comments reflecting on the market dynamics of luxury vehicles, with @iancoletx voicing that Aston Martin should be profiting more from their quality products, bringing attention to the economic aspects of luxury car ownership and sales.
Negative: Comments also express skepticism about the investment value of the car, with @patrickquade questioning the rationale behind purchasing a high-end vehicle purely to keep it without driving. He points out the potential financial losses involved. @jgriffi1 mentions an unusual upcharge by Aston Martin for color options and hints at a broader scrutiny of the brand's financial sustainability. Furthermore, @cardude76 notes that while beauty and quality are present, they do not guarantee profitability, suggesting concerns over Aston Martin's financial viability in the long term.
|
 |
Positive: @campbellsoup29 expressed admiration for the vehicle's Sepang Blue color, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @theforce88 described the car as gorgeous, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. The seller, @SpeedRacer904, showcased their pride in the vehicle by sharing a video demonstrating the sport mode and the exhilarating sound of the Lamborghini exhaust, indicating a strong performance feature.
Neutral: @campbellsoup29 inquired about potential issues with the mag ride suspension system and requested details about the vehicle's paint protection film (PPF) coverage. @tonymh09 asked if the gearbox oil had been changed, while @GoFastPdave65 sought clarification regarding whether the sale is a no-reserve auction. @PowerDynamics requested a driving video with the valves open, reflecting interest in experiencing the car's performance.
Negative: @SpeedRacer904 mentioned that while they inspected the shocks during a prior maintenance check, it was challenging to confirm their condition as they no longer have access to a lift. They noted the importance of being able to distinguish between the shock modes, suggesting that if someone cannot, it might indicate a problem with the shocks. Additionally, the gearbox oil had not been changed, which could raise concerns for potential buyers about the vehicle's maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: @4byFreak (The Seller) describes the vehicle as nearly new, emphasizing its low mileage of 14k, two previous owners, and limited edition features. He praises the reliability of the Tundra, highlighting the absence of turbos and excessive electronics that are prevalent in newer models. Commenters @SimplyAnEnthusiast99, @Noisycow, and @SuprFreak appreciate the truck's aesthetic appeal, expressing admiration for its beauty, spacious back seat, and outstanding condition. @Richbert211 mentions the low mileage as a significant draw, and @Woodgremlin shares his long-term satisfaction with a similar model, further endorsing its durability and utility.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @enderspapa and @ottofamily2007, raise questions about the vehicle's minor damage and maintenance history. @ediace19 seeks clarification on the nature of the damage, while @Creid83 inquires about the level of care the truck received during its life. @4byFreak (The Seller) addresses the accident, stating it is reported as minor and confirming that it does not show evidence of significant repairs. He notes that the truck has seen regular servicing, which includes 14 maintenance records, and asserts that it is ready for immediate use, offering peace of mind to potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns arise from commenters like @enderspapa and @ottofamily2007 questioning the credibility of the truck's history given its two owners and low mileage over a long duration. There is a hint of skepticism regarding whether the necessary maintenance, such as fluid changes and filter replacements, has been performed, especially considering its age. @TMR0352 predicts a competitive bidding war but suggests a need for caution amidst the excitement. Overall, while many comments express enthusiasm, there are underlying doubts from some users about the vehicle's condition and history, casting a shadow over its impressive features.
|
2003 Harley-Davidson Electra Glide Standard 100th Anniversary Edition
1HD1DDV143Y621148
Lot 233267
Dealer
 |
Positive: @Sstrickstein, the seller, has a welcoming approach to potential buyers, encouraging them to schedule inspections during the auction period to ensure a thorough evaluation of the vehicle. He emphasizes the importance of understanding the auction process and urges bidders to communicate clearly using the Contact Seller button. The seller appreciates the engaging comments from users like @Mikedtaz, who have inquiries about specific motorcycle features, and expresses gratitude for the enthusiastic community discussion surrounding the auction listing.
Neutral: Throughout the comments, @Mikedtaz and @Steelrydr pose relevant questions about the motorcycle's components, such as the condition of the horn and the mileage on the tires. @Sstrickstein responds promptly to these inquiries, clarifying that the horn was replaced and confirming that the tires are relatively new with low mileage. This interchange reflects a constructive dialogue between the seller and potential bidders, showcasing the bike's details, although no personal opinions about the bike's performance or condition are explicitly stated in these exchanges.
Negative: While most feedback seems constructive, there are underlying concerns about the auction environment. @Sstrickstein warns against non-serious bidders who might engage in the bidding process without the intent to follow through, highlighting that both he and BaT take such issues seriously. This caution may imply frustrations in previous auctions regarding non-paying bidders, which adds an element of tension to the otherwise positive bidding atmosphere, as indicated by the emphasis on having pre-approved funds and thorough review of the auction details before placing bids.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the Mustang as a beautiful and original piece, capturing the charm of its era. @jbinct and @Calntvs share their enthusiasm for the car's classic Wimbledon White color and driveline, noting it as stylish daily transportation. @carchasers (The Seller) emphasizes the car's originality and unique history, highlighting its preserved condition and how it has been cared for over the years, making it a rare find for enthusiasts.
Neutral: @broodie raises a question regarding why the air conditioning system isn't working and expresses curiosity about the missing belt on the compressor. @rgilson7 provides insights into the belt situation, clarifying the configuration based on their observations. @Ypss36 reflects on the typical sales tactics of Mustang's early days and how pricing strategies were used to entice customers, drawing a nostalgic picture of the car dealership experience during that time.
Negative: @beaverdam213 makes a somewhat disheartening comment, suggesting that sometimes classic cars like this Mustang might be valued more for their parts and scrap than as a whole vehicle. This casts a shadow on the otherwise positive feedback from the enthusiasts and highlights a more cynical view of the market value of such cars.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm about the Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder being sold. @testdummypilot highlighted that the car is a unique, low-mileage beauty, emphasizing its excellent condition and originality. Commenters like @RMQ333 appreciated the car's aesthetic aspects and performance potential, noting its low mileage and vibrant color. Others, such as @Wire-Wheels, shared their own positive experiences with similar vehicles, showcasing the reliability and enjoyment these models have provided over the years.
Neutral: The seller, @testdummypilot, acknowledged the challenges buyers face when purchasing vehicles online. They emphasized a commitment to transparency and customer service, mentioning the efforts made to provide comprehensive descriptions and visual content, including over 300 pictures and multiple videos. Ultimately, the seller encouraged confidence in the purchase process, reminding potential buyers of their long-standing family-owned business and commitment to satisfaction.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, there were hints at concerns regarding the online buying experience. @brakeservo shared a cautionary tale about the risks that can come with purchasing a vehicle sight unseen, highlighting the importance of thorough research on listings. Additionally, @testdummypilot admitted that while they strive for excellence, mistakes can happen and not all buyers may leave satisfied, indicating that some might have unrealistic expectations.
|
24-Years-Family-Owned 2001 Jaguar Vanden Plas Supercharged
SAJDA25B91MF21690
Lot 233273
Private Party
 |
Positive: @BRKMarsh praised the vehicle as fabulous and rare, expressing hope for a good selling price. @mgospo22 described the car as beautiful, while @JBINNJ highlighted its status as an exceptional example of a low-mileage X308 VDP, emphasizing the beauty of its body, paint, leather, and wood. He also noted the enjoyment the new owner would have with the vehicle, indicating strong appreciation for its design and quality. @Jagxk150 acknowledged the car's appeal, stating it should sell for a higher price than the current bid, conveying a positive outlook on the vehicle's value.
Neutral: @944play commented on the alloy wheel style, and @kerryorr expressed concern over the timing chain issue. @2001JAGUAR (The Seller) provided information that the car has not been extensively documented for timing chain tensioner replacements, but reassured potential buyers about the vehicle's performance and maintenance history. Multiple commenters, including @PanJaguar, recognized the car's age but valued it nonetheless, suggesting potential maintenance choices for future leaks.
Negative: On the downside, @Adobe pointed out an issue with the headliner separating from its backing, questioning what fixes might be easy or costly. @BINNJ raised concerns about the timing chain weaknesses and other suspension issues that typically arise with age in Jaguar vehicles, suggesting that maintenance would likely be necessary regardless of low mileage. This aligns with @RUBRODI's inquiry about whether the car had sat unused for long periods, indicating potential worries about its overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its unique and impressive build quality, noting its innovative design inspired by the McLaren F1 and Tesla features. @BubbaGPZ1100 expressed admiration by calling it a "phenomenal and cutting-edge build," while @Typhoontaz highlighted the attention to detail in the construction. Other users, such as @tsf123 and @Atom0096, complimented it as an amazing and cool project, with @stylepergallon specifically noting its stylish design and drawing comparisons to high-profile sports cars.
Neutral: Several comments sought more information about the vehicle's performance and specifications. @pmiranda and @simplyanenthusiast99 were curious about the vehicle's supercharging capabilities and performance statistics, while @PhilN asked about the availability of a build video. @dlud (The Seller) provided insight into the vehicle's capabilities, confirming features like fast charging compatibility and the presence of an iBooster for the braking system. Questions about practical aspects, like driving range and weight distribution, also reflected a keen interest in the vehicle's usability.
Negative: Conversely, there were some critiques related to the vehicle's design and functionality. @BKZoeller suggested the vehicle needed to be lowered further to improve aesthetics, while @dajiba55 expressed disappointment that it does not feature a center driving position like the McLaren F1. Additionally, @GertBerns and @lunarx raised concerns about the battery capacity and performance potential, questioning if the pack could adequately support the motor's output. Users like @HeyNk expressed mixed feelings, finding the vehicle both intriguing and perplexing, indicating a certain level of confusion about its intended purpose.
|
 |
Positive: @Jelliott (The Seller) presents this Jaguar XK as a beautiful vintage car, highlighting its deep jewel-like color and solid performance with a 300hp 4.2-liter V8 engine that offers substantial torque and highway punch. Commenters like @Farpointhold and @Nbeach48 praise the car's visual appeal and presentation, appreciating the detailed descriptions and videos provided by the seller. Additionally, @LuvBritCars reminisces positively about their personal experience with a similar model, indicating the XK's status as a reliable and enjoyable car for road trips.
Neutral: Several commenters engage with @Jelliott (The Seller) regarding specific features and details of the vehicle. For instance, @XKRCat inquires about a reported accident, while @Nessel18 asks for specifics about the aftermarket Bluetooth dongle used in the car. Other users, like @SoGi, are interested in the condition of the tires and the number of keys available, showcasing a balanced mix of inquiries about the car's history and specifications without leaning towards criticism or praise.
Negative: Some potential concerns have been raised by users regarding the car's history. @kenstone1005 and @XKRCat express curiosity about the vehicle's past, specifically regarding accidents or previous ownership, which may leave some bidders cautious. Additionally, there are hints of frustration from @sixty6chevy about the Bluetooth functionality, echoing a common challenge with modern connectivity in older cars. Overall, while the vehicle enjoys a favorable view, there are questions around its background that could influence buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed excitement about the rare features of the vehicle, noting its unique interior options and historical significance, particularly its previous service with the sheriff's department. @David_P pointed out the rarity of a one-piece bench in a bubble Caprice wagon, while @Blurple shared nostalgia about the model's scarcity in New Jersey during the 90s. @1998redwagon hinted at the car's appeal, despite the engine's limitations, and @aghandian confirmed the vehicle's law enforcement background, which added a layer of interest for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several users discussed specifics about the vehicle's condition and features. @DW6000 asked questions regarding its history as a government fleet vehicle, and @CarFoolLane highlighted the need for more information to decode the options on the SPID label. @JayKay2430 contributed details about the paint code, indicating discrepancies in the car’s current color versus the original. This conversation highlighted the importance of understanding the vehicle's past for a better valuation.
Negative: Concerns were raised about transparency regarding the vehicle's past, particularly regarding its history as a former government vehicle. @DW6000 expressed disappointment over what they perceived as the seller's lack of disclosure about known issues and history, suggesting it was crucial information for buyers. Some commenters felt the engine's performance, specifically the 'gutless' 305 ci engine noted by @1998redwagon, detracted from the vehicle's overall appeal, with remarks about the aftermarket aspects further fueling skepticism around the seller's claims.
|
 |
Positive: @lambogas (The Seller) welcomes potential buyers to view or inspect the vehicle before the auction ends, expressing good luck to all participants. @cashmast55 congratulated for placing their first bid, while @badcad commented positively on the vehicle's color, suggesting it would perform well in auctions like BaT. @Slowchoa68 noted that the car is a raw muscle vehicle without electric motors, indicating excitement about the car's value potentially rising as availability declines.
Neutral: There were inquiries from @Jguido about the fate of the last buyer and the previous high bid. @lambogas (The Seller) responded that the car was not theirs at the time and encouraged bidders to participate. @gmhz06 asked if the vehicle has navigation, which had not been clearly indicated.
Negative: @dbrown1185 expressed skepticism about the car's pricing, stating that it is beautiful but overpriced, indicating a past high bid of 160k that did not result in a sale. Overall, there seems to be concern over whether the current asking price aligns with the vehicle's actual market value.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's unique history and connection to motorsport, noting that it represents a piece of Acura's legacy as a pace car in the Indy Racing League. @JBinAustin highlighted the attractive blue color, which contributes positively to the car's aesthetic, while @Jerusha praised it for being a beautiful and significant model beyond ordinary NSX builds. @CultivatedCollector noted its curb appeal and the top-tier presentation of the car, indicating that it would make a great addition for collectors.
Neutral: Several users contributed constructive discussions, questioning the specifics of the vehicle's color and modifications, with @HCE_Performance and @red1997 discussing the non-stock color and the purpose behind the modifications. @NathanE444 pointed out discrepancies in the car's history regarding its original color versus current paint, and @soliloquist examined the claims surrounding the engine's displacement, sparking dialogue about transparency and accuracy in the listing. These comments reflected a mix of curiosity and cautious interest in the vehicle’s condition and modifications, stressing the importance of research and evidence in car listings.
Negative: Conversely, some users expressed skepticism about the quality of the car's repaint and the representation of its condition. @nsxot1c raised serious concerns regarding paint runs, overspray, and hardware issues, suggesting that the car's presentation might not live up to a high expectation for a vehicle of its asking price around $65k. This perspective highlighted the importance of potential buyers being aware of the car's limitations and possibly treating it more as a track vehicle rather than a pristine collector's item.
|
 |
Positive: Comments reflect enthusiasm for the vehicle, with @TMR0352 expressing excitement about the truck's features like the crew cab and long bed. @BSer appreciates the vehicle's appeal, referring to it as a 'sweet old man rig' and praising the quality of the photography in the listing. @BeastRig describes it as a 'beast of a rig,' indicating a strong admiration for the truck's capabilities and presence.
Neutral: The seller, @SullivanAutoHouse, provides a thorough description of the vehicle, emphasizing its excellent condition and the availability of recent service receipts. They also share video content to further showcase the truck's features and reliability. @planeblaine asks specific questions about the vehicle’s functionality, indicating a desire for detailed information before making a decision.
Negative: There is a hint of disappointment from @GUINTO, who humorously laments that the pricing is beyond their reach, suggesting that the value of the truck is perceived as high. This comment reflects a barrier to potential buyers who may be interested but unable to afford the vehicle. Overall, while there are no outright negative comments about the vehicle itself, there is an acknowledgment of the competitive pricing.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters, including @gscharnagl and @Hatrad, expressed admiration for the vehicle's striking aesthetics, particularly its bright red interior and overall color combination, referring to it as their dream car. @Profcarnut shared positive experiences from owning similar models, highlighting the exceptional performance and comfort of the SL55, confirming that the driving experience is unparalleled in this segment. @bradleydanger also noted the vehicle's powerful performance capabilities, referring to it as a 'rocket ship.' Overall, there is a strong appreciation for the car's visual appeal and driving experience among several enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters raised inquiries about the vehicle's condition and maintained systems, including @bproosow, who focused on the functionality of the seat bladders and other key electronic components. @hammer1234redsox2004 pointed out the necessity of checking for potential electrical draws and asked for specifics on tire sizes and wear. Additionally, the seller, @Collectibleclassics, assured interested buyers that all queries would be promptly addressed, and they detailed recent service work to assure stakeholders of the vehicle's operational status while reiterating their commitment to transparency in the selling process.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition, as various commenters pointed out discrepancies in repair documentation and potential maintenance issues. @hammer1234redsox2004 noticed that many repair bills referenced an SL500 instead of SL55, suggesting a possible identity confusion for the car. @bproosow and others requested for images showcasing the undercarriage without shields for a thorough evaluation, while other mentions of battery issues and electronic malfunctions indicated a need for careful consideration before purchasing. Against a backdrop of praise, these concerns highlighted the complexities of maintaining such a high-performance vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @JGraham shares their enthusiasm for the 2021 X7 M50i, describing it as an 'absolute beast' that is a joy to drive. They appreciate the practicality of the fold-down rear seats compared to captain seats, highlighting the vehicle's functionality. Their comparison of the X7 to the Lear 60 of SUVs underscores the luxury and performance aspects that appeal to many enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Nickyreno asks about the presence of full matte PPF, to which @RobbyMacc (The Seller) responds that the vehicle has a matte finish without PPF. Additionally, @LC2 expresses interest in the vehicle's unique characteristics and inquires about potential transfer case issues, service history, and details regarding minor scratches repaired before the sale, showing a careful consideration of the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @D3774 warns that potential buyers should consider obtaining a third-party warranty for the X7, sharing a concerning account of a neighbor who spent over $15,000 on repairs, including issues with the timing chain and differential. @Nickyreno also raises concerns by asking if a starter recall has been addressed, indicating that there may be reliability issues with the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @mick59 commented on the vehicle's attractive appearance, praising its look, stance, and power plant, noting that it is sure to turn heads and calling it a tasteful custom. @1972k5blazer, the seller, expressed gratitude for the compliment. Other users like @Classichondaman shared admiration for the vehicle, indicating a positive sentiment overall about its aesthetic and modifications.
Neutral: Several comments sought additional information and clarification about various aspects of the vehicle, such as undercarriage condition, engine specifications, and operational functionality. @FredoJr requested pictures of specific areas, while @Danskayak inquired about the running condition and suitability as a daily driver for a short commute. @Rlehman1972 and @209klassiccycles asked for videos of the vehicle being started and driven, as well as better pictures of certain interior details.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns regarding the vehicle's modifications and condition. @Danskayak pointed out a tear in the driver's seat, and @TruthBeTold asked for details about engine components and suggested potential improvements to the vehicle's appearance. @209klassiccycles urged the seller to address outstanding questions promptly as time was running out, highlighting some frustration with the response time from @1972k5blazer.
|
 |
Positive: @RWB_AZ describes the vehicle as a beauty that surely has interesting stories to tell, expressing inspiration to use the vehicle for practical tasks. @TyHulsey appreciates the turquoise and white color scheme, likening the ride to a nostalgic first prom night while complimenting the vehicle's appearance, comparing it to Vanna White. These comments highlight the attractive aesthetics and emotional appeal of the vehicle, generating positive enthusiasm from potential buyers.
Neutral: @kzrockwell raises a technical question about modifications made for the front axle hubs to accommodate dually wheels, indicating a practical interest in the vehicle's capabilities. Similarly, @ironfish asks for a video of the engine starting and running, showing a desire to assess the vehicle's condition and performance more closely. These inquiries reflect a neutral stance, focusing on factual aspects rather than emotional reactions.
Negative: @TheSharkman expresses concern about oil leakage around the pan, indicating a potential mechanical issue that could detract from the vehicle’s appeal. This comment introduces a note of caution regarding the vehicle's maintenance and condition, which may lead to hesitancy for some prospective buyers.
|
Ex–Jerry Seinfeld 1989 Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe 25th Anniversary Edition
WP0AB0916KS121147
Lot 233288
Dealer
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, with @route71s calling it "spectacular" due to its condition. @E9couper emphasized its potential value, suggesting it could reach $100K, especially considering its low mileage of only 11K. @boaboyoz described it as a "real" and "spectacular" 25th Anniversary Carrera, signaling that it stands out even among other notable vehicles. Many agree that the car's history, particularly with previous owner Jerry Seinfeld, lends it an additional layer of desirability, with @Wagen59 highlighting the meticulousness of Seinfeld as a collector.
Neutral: The auction atmosphere included practical discussions concerning the car's features and history. @Foustlease (The Seller) conveyed essential information about the car, stating that there is documentation backing Jerry Seinfeld's ownership. There were questions raised about specific details, such as the original dash plaque and the vehicle's paintwork, with @bonjo2661 seeking clarification on non-original paint. The community seems to appreciate the car's background while also scrutinizing its authenticity and specifics, exemplified by @capthorod1 suggesting the inclusion of more provenance visuals.
Negative: There were some reservations about the influence of its celebrity ownership on the bidding process. @jimmytheirishman commented he was interested in other celebrity cars, while @jww427 stated they would not pay a premium solely for the car's celebrity status. Additionally, @rnick74 alluded to Seinfeld's other vehicles, highlighting concerns about potential issues with past ownership, potentially affecting perceived value. Commenters like @imk67 noted the preference to assess vehicles based on their own merits rather than celebrity ties, reinforcing a pragmatic outlook during the bidding discussions.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and excellent condition after a thorough restoration. @RiffRaff called it a beauty and wished good luck to the seller. @royclausen praised the vehicle's design and shared his ownership experience with another model in a different color. @ALGEE17 emphasized the nimbleness and driving pleasure of the car, while @Frank_Barrett appreciated the restoration work and the fun driving experience it promised. The seller, @FantasyJunction, reinforced this positivity by noting the car's excellent history and suitability for show and drive. @Watry also shared a personal positive experience, noting its good driving performance and overall appeal.
Neutral: Comments concerning the details of the car's specifications and history were common, reflecting a balanced view among enthusiasts. For example, @walkabout303 and @alfadoc debated the characteristics of the seats in relation to different models. @JustJed shared his experience with serial numbers and parts sourcing, which added to the understanding of Alfa Romeo's production details. @Burnsy949 noted inconsistencies between build years and titles, indicating a broader conversation regarding model histories. The feedback on the soft top by @dinoverde was addressed by the seller, indicating the necessity for some adjustments, which many viewers noted as a typical concern with vintage cars. This conversation showcases the community's shared knowledge and interest in the vehicle's specifications and prolonged enjoyment.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns regarding specific aspects of the vehicle. @rmessner mentioned that overspray on the underside of the car was bothersome, highlighting a common issue faced in restorations. @dinoverde questioned the fit of the soft top, suggesting it needed adjustments, while @shakingthrough provided personal insights into addressing similar issues, along with minor maintenance tips. @Bigblok827 and @evank sought clarity on the gearbox synchronization, indicating possible doubts about mechanical issues, though @evank noted satisfactory driving performance. These criticisms illustrate the concerns buyers may have about the finer details of vintage car restorations.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its impressive features and appealing condition. @bill930p, the seller, describes the Cayenne GTS as a joy to own, emphasizing the combination of color and options that make it stand out. @vman932 and @Timbarrato appreciate the unique features like ventilated seats, adaptive cruise control, and the high-end Burmester sound system, reinforcing the vehicle's luxury appeal. @gmh.2014 echoes praise by sharing past positive experiences with the seller, ensuring potential buyers feel assured about the transaction.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about the vehicle's specifications and past maintenance, indicating a thorough interest in its condition without strong opinions either way. @Thornado wants to know about repair records, while @Rocketman63 queries about towing capabilities, suggesting practical considerations for a potential buyer. @mongotz seeks clarification on whether the vehicle has Apple CarPlay, as it was a feature available in the model year, which reflects a common concern among buyers looking for modern connectivity.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding specific conditions of the vehicle. @jwmiller238 asks if the Cayenne can compete with another model in terms of performance, showing hesitation about its capabilities. @Rickyjr85 and @Lucan request additional information regarding recent maintenance on the transfer case and cosmetic issues like wheel road rash, highlighting a cautious perspective on its upkeep. Lastly, @mongotz pointed out discrepancies regarding detailed descriptions of road rash and scratches, reflecting uncertainty about the car's overall condition.
|
4k-Mile 2024 Chrysler Pacifica Touring L Wheelchair Vehicle by RollX Vans
2C4RC1BG1RR173768
Lot 233247
Dealer
 |
Positive: The comments praise the transparency and helpfulness of @PuristMiami, the seller. They provide detailed information about warranties, conversions, and specifications of the vehicle. @BMWE90Guy also humorously refers to the vehicle as the 'RollX of wheelchair vans,' suggesting a high quality that could appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding specific details about the vehicle, such as the height from the floor to the top of the door frame and space available for wheelchair accommodation. @KennyForsythe asked for the full invoice for the conversion and requested assistance from @PuristMiami in obtaining it. @Forchen8one and @1porsche_geek also sought clarification about the vehicle's measurements and features, indicating interest in the van's practicality for wheelchair users.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments about the vehicle itself; however, some potential buyers expressed concerns about the documentation and warranties. @JamesThomas and @KennyForsythe raised questions regarding the transfer of warranties and the availability of conversion invoices respectively, which suggests a need for clearer information for potential financing options.
|
 |
Positive: @DocMGL expressed great admiration for the vehicle's construction, describing its combination of Japanese parts as a humorous "Nippon-stein." @Dino886 called it an awesome build, praising its thoughtful features that blend nostalgia with modern upgrades. @boaboyoz highlighted the bus's beauty and uniqueness, stating that it is way too cool for school. @Sunroof emphasized the incredible quality of the build, further affirming the bus's impressive stature and craftsmanship.
Neutral: @GLWA,Toadranger inquired about the vehicle's heating and defrost capabilities, showing interest in its comfort features. @jquirin, the seller, addressed various questions about the vehicle, confirming it has heat but lacking a defroster. They provided additional context about the bus's intended use for weekend trips, noting its current lack of usage and promising to respond to inquiries. The seller also clarified some aspects of the bus's performance and the specific features addressed in the comments.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the transmission with multiple users questioning whether it required replacement parts. @Danny53 suggested it needed a new clutch and pressure plate due to issues in driving, which @jquirin contested by mentioning mechanics found no slipping and attributed the performance to driving style. @Farfman criticized the ongoing dust on certain photos and the absence of pictures of the cooling system, reflecting dissatisfaction with the presentation's thoroughness.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described as a really nice, low-mileage LR4, with upgrades to the aluminum coolant crossover pipes which address a common failure point. The seller, @amotorsports, emphasizes that the undercarriage was treated with rust reformer and that the truck presents very well with plenty of life left. They also assure potential buyers that the timing chain is functioning properly with no noise or warning lights, and they highlight their willingness to assist with nationwide shipping for the winning bidder.
Neutral: While @bringatrailer pointed out that the original sticker price may need correction, another buyer, @WAGONBOYTD, mentioned the importance of additional photos of the center section where corrosion can be common in Chicago cars. @bhanderson9 raised several questions about the timing chain inspection, aluminum coolant pipes, and air suspension maintenance, prompting @amotorsports to provide detailed responses regarding their inspections and maintenance performed on the vehicle. The seller confirmed that all systems are functioning properly and provided reassurances about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Concerns about rust were acknowledged in the comments, particularly by @WAGONBOYTD who noted the potential for corrosion in Chicago cars. Although @amotorsports stated that some rust is present, they tried to mitigate it during maintenance. Additionally, @bhanderson9 queried the lack of documentation for past maintenance on the coolant systems and air suspension, indicating potential scrutiny regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and how well previous issues were addressed.
|
 |
Positive: @Euro_Classica (The Seller) is receiving enthusiastic feedback for their vehicle, with users praising the 'killer spec' of the GTC speed 80-11 edition. @atoll appreciates the car’s overall appeal, and @Remy22 is also excited about its specifications, indicating a positive sentiment towards the vehicle's value. Furthermore, @Euro_Classica (The Seller) actively engages with the commenters, promising updates and even sharing that they have completed a $5k service item by replacing vacuum lines, showcasing their commitment to maintaining the car.
Neutral: Comments like those from @Bojackson reflect interest in specific details of the car, such as the headliner’s condition and whether there are videos demonstrating the vehicle's operations. The inquiries about additional media and clarifications regarding its specifications show that potential buyers are carefully considering the vehicle while assessing its features. Discussion surrounding the car's service history and requests for close-up photos reveals a balanced curiosity about its condition and performance.
Negative: However, there are some concerns, particularly from @1985RR, who notes the vehicle's history of having nine owners in fifteen years, which raises questions about its reliability and desirability. This sentiment is echoed by @ATR77, who inquires about the car's color change evidenced in the Car Fax report, leading to uncertainties about its past. Overall, while the vehicle garners positive attention, these concerns about ownership history and overall condition highlight the need for transparency and reassurance for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the appealing aesthetic and performance features of the vehicle. @PAEnglish11 expresses admiration for the color combination and mentions interest in the audio system and potential modifications. @onlyhonda4me and @drivenjp appreciate the vehicle's stunning appearance and effortless driving capabilities, emphasizing it as an amazing daily driver. Additionally, @M5Power describes the car as bordering on art, further showcasing its visual and engineering excellence. Overall, there is a shared excitement about its unique color and performance traits.
Neutral: The seller, @mlee22, provides thorough responses to inquiries, addressing concerns about the vehicle's history and condition. Updates have been given about the minor cosmetic damage, the lack of vibration issues, and the details regarding the lien process for the car's sale. Prospective buyers also discuss aspects such as key fob availability, factory configurations like the absence of Apple CarPlay, and the options for handling the transaction involving the lien. The seller's willingness to clarify these details shows transparency in the transaction process.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns regarding the condition of specific parts, particularly the wheels and tires. @gweaver speculated about possible vibrations due to what appears to be poorly refinished rims, while @Lodewyk noted previous bad experiences with vehicle delivery, hinting at the potential for hidden issues. @TacticalGuy pointed out damage to the tire sidewall visible in pictures and requested additional photos. The seller's acknowledgment of these cosmetic issues reflects an ongoing need to manage buyer concerns while also emphasizing that the vehicle is still drivable despite any imperfections.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters positively highlighted the stunning aesthetics of the vehicle, notably its deep green exterior and sand beige interior. @BlackMountainMotorworks noted that the photos do not do justice to how brilliant the paint looks in reality. Additionally, the seller emphasized the comprehensive restoration made under previous ownership, which many participants appreciated. The restoration details shared by @BlackMountainMotorworks confirmed the quality of work that has been put into the car, with various parts replaced and the interior revamped, thus presenting a compelling case to potential buyers. Enthusiasts like @Neilv praised the high-quality restoration and manufacturing, underscoring the car's authentic stock setup paired with a well-tuned engine.
Neutral: There was a mix of curiosity and requests for clarification on specific aspects of the car, indicating a proactive interest in understanding its condition. @blander389 and @Deno raised questions about the rear license plate area, hoping to know more about any modifications, or repairs performed. Comments from @Broovy and @Aniskho conveyed inquiries about the vehicle's height and the absence of an air conditioning unit, highlighting that this GTV maintains an original stance typical of vintage models. While some expressed admiration for the updates, others pointed out that there remain areas where potential improvements might be considered, like the suspension, aligning with the seller's perspective that the car provides a chance for customization for the next owner.
Negative: Some participants voiced concerns about rust issues, particularly around the windshield and floorboard areas, which raised doubts about the extent of restoration quality. @moretacosplease and @nonuniform specifically asked for additional photos to analyze the potential rust damage, and @phavriluk requested details addressing the identified pinhole rust in the floorboard. Critiques about the repaint and lack of comprehensive matches in the engine compartment were made by @Alfetta70s, who questioned whether the car could genuinely be classified as restored given these discrepancies. Comments like these reflect skepticism among potential buyers about the thoroughness of past repairs and the possibility of structural integrity being compromised.
|
 |
Positive: @Sheltn4 shared an interesting historical fact about the Ford plant, elaborating on @1940FordCOE's comment. This provides more context regarding the vehicle's origins and its connection to the community, making it appealing to enthusiasts who value automotive history. The mention of the shopping mall utilizing existing structures from the plant days adds a unique charm to the vehicle's backstory, enhancing its overall allure for potential buyers.
Neutral: Commenters have raised pertinent questions regarding the vehicle's condition and history, such as @DATop's inquiry about the 'Georgia title with a Conditional notation' and @GetUrDone-777's request for videos demonstrating the truck in operation. Additionally, @Jjesser asked about potential rust spots and the vehicle's tracking and stopping performance, indicating a general curiosity about its structural integrity and operational soundness. Such inquiries reveal a keen interest in ensuring the vehicle is in good shape before potential purchase.
Negative: There are several concerns indicated by commenters that could potentially detract from the vehicle's value. @JoeD3rd's question regarding the 'conditional notation on the title' hints at possible issues with the vehicle's ownership or financing. @Jjesser's query about rust spots suggests anxieties over deterioration, which may indicate a lack of maintenance or structural problems. These negative aspects could raise red flags for potential buyers regarding the overall quality and reliability of the truck.
|
30-Years-Family-Owned, 302-Powered 1966 Ford Mustang Coupe 5-Speed
6R07C163546
Lot 233297
Private Party
 |
Positive: @DENWERKS expressed admiration for the vibe and stance of the vehicle, calling it lovely. @WeGottaFindUsAFord also complimented the stance, describing it with a chef's kiss emoji, and showed excitement for potential driving videos. @David_P praised the Trans Am look, specifically highlighting the wheel choice and tire sizing as perfect. @dogsandsheep echoed these sentiments, stating that the car has the best stance and is looking forward to seeing driving videos. @marlenautomotive (The Seller) indicated that they would upload driving videos and responded to enthusiasm by confirming recent uploads.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about videos of the car running and driving, with @Kcollier22 and @krazytrkr suggesting a cold start video and other driving footage that highlights the car's performance. @ACowart expressed a desire for additional video content to further appreciate the vehicle. @dogsandsheep noted the car's impressive sound and shifting behavior but did not provide strong opinions beyond that.
Negative: There were some critical comments regarding safety features, particularly from @David_P, who noted that the lap belts and unpadded roll bar could pose serious risks in the event of an accident. @platzman expressed disappointment over a structural issue with the trunk lid being pinned. Overall, while the majority of comments were positive or neutral, safety concerns and specific critiques were raised.
|
 |
Positive: @WAGONBOYTD commented on the 2020 Land Rover, suggesting it’s a cool edition to see, especially noting the importance of having an ICarsoft scanner for potential electrical issues. This was echoed by @SouthernMotorCompany (The Seller), who affirmed that having a higher-end scanner could help diagnose any vehicle problems effectively. They also mentioned that they sell around 10 Land and Range Rovers monthly, highlighting the vehicles' reliability. Additionally, comments from @DefenderZack praised the Trek edition for its beauty and readiness for off-road adventures, while @dmnmkmcm5 appreciated that the Trek edition includes 3rd row seats, indicating the vehicle’s practicality.
Neutral: There were mixed perceptions about the Trek edition, with @Valkyrja humorously mistaking it for a Trek bicycle edition. @SouthernMotorCompany (The Seller) clarified that the vehicle is an actual event truck rather than strictly a Trek edition, confirming its features like the rear locker option when responding to @Evomike's inquiries. The seller explained that the graphics are specially crafted in vinyl for this event truck, emphasizing the uniqueness of its design. @Max5 also noted that the Discovery looks brand new but flagged that the battery had been changed multiple times, indicating a lack of use.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle’s reliability surfaced in some comments, particularly from @Max5 who pointed out multiple battery changes in a short timeframe, indicating potential issues. @SouthernMotorCompany (The Seller) responded to this by explaining that the vehicle was largely unused for several years, which could contribute to battery discharges. The seller assured that the vehicle hasn't faced such problems under their ownership, but overall, this raised a note of caution regarding the car’s history and maintenance before the current sale.
|
 |
Positive: @HuntingClassics expresses excitement about showcasing another great GMT800 Tahoe, emphasizing its pristine condition and the rarity of finding such a clean, rust-free vehicle. The seller notes that the Tahoe has been garage kept and has spent its entire life in Florida, contributing to its beautiful paint and overall attractiveness. @PulseCheck also shares enthusiasm for the vehicle, calling it 'pure Z71 perfection' and wishing them luck with the auction.
Neutral: Several commenters raised specific questions about the Tahoe’s features and condition, showing a mix of interest and curiosity. @MaxsEagles inquired about the black tape on the driver's door edge, which @HuntingClassics explained is a protective trim. Similarly, @pdipp asked about the cylinder head numbers, receiving clarification that this model features the sought-after 706 heads. @Randall1111 wanted to know about any signs of smoking within the vehicle, to which the seller confidently stated there are no smells or evidence of smoking.
Negative: There were some concerns raised by commenters, highlighting a cautious approach to the auction. @mipakr requested better photos of the roof area above the windshield due to potential concerns of rust, but @HuntingClassics quickly addressed it as merely debris. Overall, while the critiques were minor and handled promptly, they reflect potential buyers' due diligence in assessing the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praised the vehicle's beauty, highlighting the beautiful design of the E320. @onlyhonda4me expressed a desire for more wagons, underscoring the appeal of this type of vehicle. @jrenauer reminisced about their experience with the E320, describing the ride quality as magical and noting the remarkable condition of vehicles from that era, emphasizing that modern cars do not compare to the craftsmanship of models like the E320. @Frank_Barrett pointed out that the 1995 E320 was one of the best, featuring self-leveling rear suspension and low mileage, making it a great value. @Styop554 noted the car's performance, stating it drives extremely smooth and performs flawlessly, inviting inquiries and providing additional details upon request.
Neutral: @Stagehand discussed potential modifications, mentioning the aesthetic possibilities and confirming the car's solid foundation for future upgrades. @Davethewave inquired about the functionality of the headrests and acknowledged the car's pristine interior, while @BigTaco provided insights regarding the potential issue with the headrests without complicating the overall impression of the vehicle. @genemak1 raised questions about the wiring harness and head gasket, prompting @Styop554 to clarify the condition of the wiring harness and provide evidence that it was the updated type, while also addressing maintenance history.
Negative: Several commenters posed concerns about potential issues with certain parts of the vehicle. @Davethewave's inquiry about the headrests revealed a minor malfunction that @Styop554 plans to address but did not include repair records for previous ownership. @Chacie16 noticed discrepancies in the vehicle's photographs, questioning the presence of scratches and cracks, which resulted in @Styop554 providing clarifications, indicating that some issues might have been less noticeable due to lighting. Overall, while the vehicle garnered admiration, some comments reflected uncertainty regarding its operational specifics.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed their enthusiasm for the Chrysler 300C, highlighting its unique features and luxurious design. @Paul6200 described the vehicle as 'so cool,' noting that his wife owns a similar model, which makes him eager to consider this one for a future purchase. Enthusiasts like @TM75244 and @300CMan praised the vehicle's performance and comfort, with @300CMan specifically praising its driving joy and capabilities, stating it amazes at the track and provides a smooth highway experience. Additionally, @gvd404 supported the car's market value, viewing it as a great deal for someone looking to own a piece of automotive history.
Neutral: The auction's progress has been met with mixed anticipation among potential buyers. @MikeMidwest questioned the auction's reserve status, wondering if it truly is a no reserve auction, leading to clarifications from @Symbolic_International (The Seller) about the reserve being met. While some mentioned their current ownership of different models or expressed interest in bidding, others like @C3Lee debated the value proposition of buying a nearly new vehicle versus others with slightly higher mileage. The discussion includes various comparisons, highlighting both the appeal of the 300C and concerns about pricing.
Negative: Despite the overall excitement for the Chrysler 300C, there were murmurs of skepticism from a few users. @HeavyTank77 expressed doubt about the availability of unsold units at dealerships that might compete with this auction, suggesting potential overvaluation. @Squat humorously inquired if the driver's seat had been modified for NBA player Karl Malone, hinting at the car's spaciousness, yet it could also reflect concerns regarding its suitability for taller drivers. Additionally, while many praised the riding comfort, @C3Lee expressed hesitation about the idea of paying a premium for a low mileage vehicle when alternatives are available, showcasing a cautious viewpoint among some commenters.
|
 |
Positive: @LeeJo praises the vehicle as the "cleanest example" they've ever seen for sale, emphasizing its pristine condition and nostalgic appeal. @carl_n finds it beautiful, while @1150EML, a previous owner of several models, highlights it as an "excellent machine" and a "stunning example," though advises new tires if planning to ride. @bobrk calls it "definitely a museum piece," and @ED_C appreciates its timeless design, expressing further enjoyment in the reliability of a well-maintained version, as echoed by @HD64's experience of its dependable starting and ease of ride. @exbikeracer terms it a "diamond in the rough" and notes it could fetch good money if the right buyer sees it.
Neutral: @getnosty, the seller, introduces himself and shares enthusiasm for the bike, promising to provide more pictures and videos as the weather improves. @RichardPetty and @XR750 inquire about the reason behind the vehicle being blacked out, to which @getnosty responds, explaining it is standard policy for privacy regarding past ownership and auction processes. @rofandofy presents a comparative valuation, suggesting the bike could be worth $10-15k based on his own similar motorcycle ownership.
Negative: @RichardPetty expresses curiosity about the ownership history of the bike, hinting at a negative sentiment regarding its anonymity. @ED_C also brings up a potential issue of reliability, mentioning the anxiety of stalling at a busy intersection, which negates the joy of riding on better roads. Overall, while the vehicle gets glowing reviews for its aesthetic and performance, some comments hint at concerns regarding practicality and previous ownership clarity.
|
Mid-Engined, Turbocharged Subaru-Powered Porsche 356A Speedster Replica
57SPD00320K
Lot 233307
Private Party
 |
Positive: Comments generally highlight the impressive build quality and unique features of the vehicle. @meinrotti expressed envy over the car's mechanical setup, noting it was ideal for weekend track days or thrilling drives. @Axer911 described it as a fantastic build and praised the performance of Subaru-powered replicas compared to traditional VW models, suggesting the driving experience is significantly enhanced. @FuchzVerkaufer applauded the seller for creating an innovative and conscientious car, emphasizing that practicality is secondary to performance and the thrill of driving a well-engineered sports car.
Neutral: Several commenters posed questions about the vehicle's practicality, especially concerning its ride height and accessibility for maintenance. @mini1966 and @mbp raised concerns about the car appearing to ride higher than usual, prompting the seller to clarify that the adjustable coilovers would settle after driving. @elecktronika questioned whether the car was designed more for show than for driving, while others like @robbutler47 acknowledged its impracticalities, suggesting it might not be suitable for everyday use yet still recognized its allure. The seller provided detailed responses, reinforcing the car’s capability to eliminate common issues found in standard 356 replicas and its readiness for driving.
Negative: Some criticisms were voiced regarding the car's lack of a top and the potential limitations this imposes. @brakeservo questioned engine accessibility for repairs, hinting at concerns over maintenance ease due to the tight engine compartment. @D_Dastardly noted that the concerns over the roll-up windows and sealing seemed overly critical, though he acknowledged that such minor grievances might deter some buyers. Additionally, @c9c and @Tcb9232 expressed doubts about the practicality of driving in inclement weather without a top or windows, which may limit the vehicle's usability further.
|
 |
Positive: @RJ80 described the contemporary Plus 4s as an absolute joy to drive, highlighting that the modern powertrain enhances the vintage character and overall driving experience. @morgannut expressed admiration for the car's aesthetics, noting its beautiful colors and the enjoyable experience of driving a Morgan. @Chico1 and @Calypso850 agreed on the car's beauty and suggested that a brown top would better complement its color, indicating appreciation for its design.
Neutral: @Scliffe raised concerns about the relevance of including a 1952 road test for a 2018 model, questioning its appropriateness, while @das180 acknowledged some enduring features between models that justify comparisons. @MichaelsMotorCarsPA (The Seller) provided clarifications regarding the car's specifications, features, and its historical context as a modern Morgan, also addressing the inclusion of prior reviews. Additionally, several commenters discussed the car's title and importation details, illustrating a shared interest in understanding the specifics of this vehicle.
Negative: @UKSparky pointed out signs of rust on the undercarriage, suggesting it was concerning for a relatively new vehicle, which @morgannut and others countered by affirming the durability of Morgan's construction and addressing concerns about rust as typical for an8-year-old car. @Cgoerner voiced worries about the challenges of retitling the vehicle in certain jurisdictions like California due to confusion surrounding its classification, which raises potential obstacles for interested bidders. Overall, while some commenters expressed skepticism and confusion about the car's condition and title, others defended its quality and historical significance.
|
 |
Positive: @911c4s praises the vehicle, referring to it as a great car that they've been happy with since purchasing it new. They express goodwill towards the sale with 'GLWS'. @ICE_in_my_veins also commends the vehicle, emphasizing its extensive features by stating, 'this thing is loaded, loaded.' Additionally, @aegmotorsports notes the vehicle's impressive specifications and equipped packages, indicating a thorough and luxury-oriented offering for potential buyers.
Neutral: Comments from @nick778 inquire about the window sticker, to which @aegmotorsports responds that it will be added soon. @Akselrod asks about the vehicle's history in the rust belt, and @aegmotorsports clarifies that the car originally hails from Florida and hasn't shown any signs of rust or corrosion. This exchange conveys an informational aspect about the vehicle's maintenance and condition, reassuring potential buyers.
Negative: @Harper84 raises concerns regarding what appears to be curb damage on the right front rim, asking if it was touched up with paint. @aegmotorsports confirms the presence of curb marks that were indeed touched up. Furthermore, @Akselrod questions if there are any additional paint defects or touch-ups, to which @aegmotorsports acknowledges minor rock chips noted in the vehicle's photos, showing a trend towards transparency about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @lubricator praised the driving videos for their outstanding sound and excitement, expressing a desire to see more exhilarating footage. @Scaplan1968 referred to one 38-second drive video as possibly the greatest ever shared on BAT, particularly curious about the car's impressive rev range, which could indicate exciting performance. @Chenango highlighted the exceptional quality of the automobile, noting every detail of its restoration and craftsmanship reflects a strong commitment to authenticity and excellence. @zlrig also shared appreciation for the high standard of the restoration, emphasizing the careful sourcing of parts and the vehicle's operational integrity. Overall, the comments from these users underscore the vehicle's impressive restoration and driving experience, indicating high satisfaction with its performance and quality.
Neutral: @Chrome693 posed questions regarding the vehicle’s original specifications, like its exhaust and door panel designs, as well as the soft top's effectiveness against rain infiltration. @thebenlyshop addressed these inquiries, sharing insights about the car's design origin from Honda's motorcycle heritage and acknowledging the potential for minor water leakage during drives. In response to @misterdangerpants, @mike_rockwell made light comments about the car's capabilities, demonstrating a casual curiosity among owners and fans regarding this vintage vehicle's specifications and quirks. Such neutral observations reflect a mix of interest and respect for the vehicle's character without overt criticism or praise.
Negative: Some concerns were raised indirectly through the inquiries made by observers like @Chrome693 and @hondaholic about the authenticity and condition of parts such as wheels and exhaust. While acknowledging the potential for rain leakage, @thebenlyshop addressed concerns by emphasizing the vehicle's design and purpose as more aligned with fun driving than weather resistance. @BlitzLead noted a perceived violation of speed limits during an exciting drive, which touched on safety considerations that might concern some viewers. Overall, while the negative comments are mild and more inquisitive, they reflect a level of scrutiny that indicates not every aspect of the vehicle aligns perfectly with expectations or standards.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong enthusiasm for the 2025 Porsche 911 Carrera S Coupe, praised for its stunning specifications and overall aesthetic. @GDogg described the car as "absolutely stunning," indicating the appeal of its design. @boaboyoz referred to it as "evil elegance" and recognized @1600veloce for delivering another compelling listing, showing a consensus on the vehicle’s high desirability. Overall, the listing seems to have attracted attention from car enthusiasts who appreciate the craftsmanship and features of this model.
Neutral: Several comments center around logistical inquiries and details about the vehicle, indicating a serious interest from potential buyers. For instance, @BlankCheck requested information on the Monroney sticker, suggesting that buyers are keen on understanding the pricing and optional features. @MABRO11 and @newusername also asked specific questions about the window sticker and front axle lift, showing a methodical approach to gathering information before making a purchase decision. @1600veloce provides thorough responses to these inquiries, reinforcing their commitment to transparency in the selling process.
Negative: While overall feedback is positive, there are a few concerns raised by commenters. @Gummer pointed out what appeared to be cigarette burn marks in a photo, questioning the vehicle's condition. Although @1600veloce promptly clarified that it was simply dirt and assured that the vehicle had been cleaned, this comment highlights the scrutiny potential buyers may have regarding the car's condition. Additionally, @Route66 raised a question about the impact of the Aero kit on ground clearance, which suggests that there are some uncertainties regarding the car's specifications that might deter particular buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @mbnaples describes the bike as a nice one, showing an interest in its original tires. @Timeless23 compliments the bike's impressively stock and clean condition, stating they wouldn't change anything and will be keeping an eye on it. @MoonieGT nostalgically recalls wanting a TL in college, suggesting the bike carries an appeal for those who have a fondness for it. @Kawasakidude also refers to the bike as super nice, further highlighting its aesthetic appeal. The seller @LFFInc states that the tires are likely the original ones, in outstanding condition, and affirms that the bike has lived a pampered life inside air conditioning.
Neutral: Comments from users such as @Fredmiller show they are curious about the bike's maintenance history, asking about the condition of the gas tank and other fluids. @rabbitholepunch queries the seller about the lack of a cold start or start video for the TL, indicating a desire for more information. @mgordonvegas8 brings up potential concerns about the rear suspension issues that past models have had, suggesting the bike might be appealing for those looking to relive their experiences. Meanwhile, @john94si expresses an interest in a different bike but mentions that this TL will suffice for the moment.
Negative: Some comments include critiques, particularly from @rabbitholepunch who highlights an issue flagged by others regarding the bike's suitability for advanced riders due to its rear suspension. They reference historical problems related to the bike's rear shock damper. Additionally, @Fredmiller remarks that all the money has been brought to the table, implying a sense of skepticism about the pricing or competitive nature of the sale. @john94si's decision to back out of the conversation suggests a level of frustration or disinterest in continuing the discussion surrounding the bike.
|
 |
Positive: @Craven expressed relief that the LT1 engine has revitalized American performance cars, stating that horsepower is now accessible to the masses. This sentiment reflects a broader appreciation for this model's power and ability to excite car enthusiasts. Further, @Blurple noted the appealing color, describing Dark Purple Metallic as stylish and reminiscent of a hot color trend from the 90s, enhancing the car's overall desirability. Overall, the commenters acknowledge the car’s attractive appearance and powerful performance.
Neutral: @Huckleberry_1 commented on the car's status as a classic, emphasized by their hashtag #C4stillrealavent, which suggests a fondness for Corvette heritage. @torelloamerican (The Seller) contributed to the conversation by welcoming questions and clarifying details, such as responding to @Flipperoriginal about the availability of pictures, @Pmusgerg about the condition of the bumpers, and @MiataMan08 regarding the antenna status, which reflects good customer engagement and transparency.
Negative: @Pmusgerg pointed out potential areas of concern regarding the condition of the vehicle, specifically the need for new weatherstripping and inquiring about rock chips, which could imply possible neglect or wear on the car despite its good looks. @onlyoriginalcars criticized the low mileage of 3000 miles over 13 years, suggesting that lack of active use could negatively impact the mechanics. They also mentioned the worn condition of the car's seats, contrasting them with their own experience of higher mileage, indicating that age and wear are significant considerations for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Comments praising the vehicle highlight its impressive build quality and unique features. @Byron_BigDog expressed admiration, saying, "OMG take my money, please! This is an awesome build! Just WOW!! Freaking love it." Enthusiasts like @TBrooks appreciated its excitement with a comment on the burnout video, and @Discobob described the vehicle as a "very cool beast indeed." Users like @onlinems shared insights into its history, emphasizing its $250,000 build cost and high-quality craftsmanship that make it stand out in any showcase. Overall, users are excited about the creative design and functionality of this vehicle as a unique tailgating option.
Neutral: Some comments presented neutral observations on the vehicle. @CKKurtz commented on the practicality of a tailgater build but questioned the connection of the table and grill to the hitch. @RadialSkid noticed a detail about the lighting rods mounted on the ceiling but did not express a strong opinion about it. @Yomamma inquired about the engine type, demonstrating interest in the specifications without strong emotion. Additionally, users like @mike_rockwell acknowledged the artistic draw of the truck while maintaining a factual tone about its custom features.
Negative: There were also critical comments directed at certain aspects of the vehicle. @rperelli voiced concerns about the year of the bids being offensive, indicating potential discontent with its auction process. @hiltonfarms questioned the shipping options available for the vehicle, suggesting some frustration over practical issues related to the auction. Additionally, @MikeDTaz pointed out what he perceived as a minor flaw in the build with the driveshaft centering, reflecting a level of scrutiny over the vehicle's construction. These comments suggest not all observers were wholly impressed with the vehicle or the auction conditions.
|
 |
Positive: @glope99 commented positively about the vehicle, noting that he has an identical Volvo with almost 300K miles, which still performs well. This reflects the reliability and durability of the model. @david97 also expressed admiration for the car, indicating a general appreciation for the vehicle's appeal and quality. @Atdds (The Seller) received a compliment from @glope99, showcasing the positive regard for the car being sold.
Neutral: @Atdds (The Seller) explained that the reason for the quick sale was due to personal circumstances; the car was intended for his fiancé’s daughter, who did not obtain her driver's license as planned. @Atdds (The Seller) mentioned that the shipping cost to transport the car from Washington State to Raleigh, NC was $2400, highlighting the care taken in acquiring the vehicle. Additionally, @toolmantaylor inquired about the Carfax report, which was addressed by @Atdds (The Seller), noting that he requested it and acknowledged the absence of it in the listing, indicating a concern for transparency.
Negative: @snova pointed out a potential issue regarding a large dent on the passenger side rear door, indicating that this may not have been captured clearly in the photos provided. @Atdds (The Seller) confirmed the existence of the dent after further inspection, which might raise concerns for potential buyers regarding the vehicle's condition. Despite the dent, there was an effort made by @Atdds (The Seller) to provide additional photos for clarification, but the initial oversight could lead to a negative impression for some viewers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle, with @Blk_ws6 noting it is a 'Good looking Jeep.' @Jayp954 (The Seller) responds to requests positively, providing a driving video and assuring that the Jeep is in 'great shape inside and out.' Additionally, @Jayp954 shares updated photos of the rear wheels, further showcasing the vehicle's maintenance and enhancements, which adds to the overall positive perception.
Neutral: @Flek2740 asks if the Jeep has been regeared and what the current gear configuration is, indicating interest in the vehicle's performance specifications. Additionally, they observe that the temperature display is in Celsius and question whether the Jeep is a Canadian model. These are technical inquiries without a strong positive or negative tone, showing curiosity about the details of the vehicle.
Negative: There are no explicitly negative comments regarding the Jeep, but the inquiries about its gearing and the Celsius temperature gauge could imply some concerns about the vehicle's suitability for buyers who might prefer standard features typically found in American models. The questioning may suggest uncertainty about the vehicle's modifications or origin, which might deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express strong admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive features and modifications. @Xcarscal remarked on the stunning appearance of the triple black color, while @Cellamotors (The Seller) described the car as a magnificent example of the GT500, noting its showroom condition and low miles, which add to its appeal. @DKeng and @Kherman241 praised the aesthetic aspects, such as the black paint with gloss stripes and the transformative glass roof. Others, like @Knacejr, shared their excitement about the mods, calling them perfect and emphasizing the glass roof as a significant plus.
Neutral: Various commentators engaged with specific details about the vehicle, indicating a keen interest in its specifications. @gbvetracer inquired about the stock parts saved after modifications, to which @Cellamotors clarified that all original parts are included. Some users, like @J.R.Platko and @jes7, asked questions concerning emissions compliance and equipment packages, showing a focus on practical aspects of the car ownership experience. Additionally, @MLipford sought clarification on the horsepower and torque figures provided by the seller, emphasizing the importance of accurate information for potential buyers.
Negative: However, not all feedback was entirely positive. @68Vet expressed disappointment over the absence of heated seats, stating that they were out of the running due to this feature missing, although later clarifications suggested it was meant humorously. @jes7 pointed out misconceptions regarding trim packages, indicating a misunderstanding about the vehicle's features. @TNB8 also corrected a detail about a previous GT500, suggesting a minor confusion over specifications within the comments, highlighting that even among enthusiasts, there can be miscommunication.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described as a 2012 BMW 650i M Sport Convertible, showcasing features like a twin-turbo V8 engine rated at 400 hp and an impressive list of included amenities like heated front seats and adaptive headlights. @EJWinters3 expressed that the buyer who backed out missed out on a "pretty good deal on a very nice ride." Further, another commenter, @Jfolckemer, noted satisfaction from previous purchases from the seller, highlighting a positive reputation.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's condition reveal a discussion about wear on the interior surfaces, specifically the center console and driver's door panel. @EJWinters3 requested clarification on the wear, and the seller provided reassurance stating the wear is common from frequent use. @kheflw33 asked for more photos from different angles to alleviate concerns, which the seller agreed to provide, indicating an engagement between potential buyers and the seller.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle were raised surrounding the wear on the interior, with @EJWinters3 questioning if the wear appeared melted and seeking repair estimates. Additionally, questions arose regarding the vehicle's braking system, with @Jfolckemer seeking confirmation on the type of brakes present, leading to some confusion about previously stated descriptions. @Revsrav inquired about a potential auction listing not recorded on the Carfax, showing lingering hesitance among commenters regarding the vehicle's history and condition.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle, a Mitsubishi Evo X MR, has received positive feedback for being well maintained with a solid service history. @p1_motorcars_ltd highlighted the car's stock condition and emphasized its robust performance, including a perfectly functioning transmission and strong engine compression results that are typical for the model. Additionally, the seller provided reassurance regarding the car's compliance for import into the USA, noting its emissions compliance and offering discounted freight rates which add to its appeal.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding the vehicle's condition and performance features, with @roeski and @WilderDriven seeking specifics on the transmission reliability and the vehicle's overall maintenance status. The seller was able to provide detailed answers confirming that the transmission is in excellent condition and that routine maintenance has been performed consistently. Potential buyers expressed interest in the car's thorough inspection and repair process, illustrating a general curiosity about the vehicle's current state and maintenance history.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about possible issues needing attention before purchase, specifically about the overall functionality of various components. @Doc1965 inquired about the car's AYC pump condition and other operational switches and gauges. The seller reassured potential buyers that everything is in working order, but the need for continued vigilance regarding vehicle reliability was implied as a caution from potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg praised the vehicle, calling it a simply spectacular GTC and extended best wishes to the seller. @johnambrose expressed admiration for the color combination and overall selection of the car, remarking on its beautiful build. @CK23, the seller, provided insights about the vehicle's history, mentioning that they have owned it for two years and only drove it 1500 miles, emphasizing the car's maintenance and condition, which garnered interest from potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding the car's condition and service history. @msantin asked when the last service occurred and what was performed, while @johnambrose inquired about the age of the tires and the service records over the years. @otisorsburn and @grenierM1 posed questions about legroom and the front bumper's condition, showing interest in the vehicle's practicality and upkeep. @CK23 responded to these queries with details about the last service date and provided requested photos, indicating openness and responsiveness to potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about the car's service history and condition. @johnambrose highlighted the absence of complete service records in the Carfax report and questioned if deferred services would incur costs at a dealership. @Yuppster raised concerns about potential issues with the front suspension, a known problem with this model. @grenierM1 expressed disappointment from a past experience with a scuffed vehicle and requested additional pictures of the underside of the bumper to avoid similar issues, indicating a level of skepticism regarding the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors praised the vehicle for its attractive specifications and unique features. @jjohann84 highlighted the abundance of nice models available, while @Euro_Classica pointed out the effective IMS upgrade. @tgtint described the car as legitimate and mentioned the strong options available for sale. Several commentors expressed admiration for the design, mentioning the appealing Polar over Boxster color combination (@solarfish) and the desirable early model traits (@bluesman). The car's great spec sheet, full leather interior, and unique options like the GT3 center console delete were also celebrated by multiple users, including @clrcrx and @RogerB.
Neutral: Some users inquired about the vehicle's service history and additional information. @paddict8 asked if documentation of service performed is available, while others requested more visuals, such as cold start videos and paint measurement, from @Euro_Classica. Users like @RC396 were interested in seeing the car and learning more about its features. There was also a discussion about IMS bearings and their comparisons, with @Ken9___ offering insight on the topic and prompting others to seek more information from various forums.
Negative: A few comments expressed preferences based on personal experiences or concerns. @justanamateur noted a preference for the original dual-row IMS bearing found in earlier models, suggesting it as more robust compared to aftermarket solutions. Additionally, @jtciii questioned a specific modification related to the center console, seeking clarity from @clrcrx but did not express irritation. Overall, there weren't significant negative sentiments, but a few users highlighted personal preferences that may not align with the car's features.
|
 |
Positive: @Saturday18 (The Seller) expressed that the car is a solid example, mentioning that they have driven it on long trips without issue. @DocMGL shared a sentiment about the car being a "relic of a simpler age," indicating appreciation for its nostalgic value. The seller is also open to showing the car anytime this week to interested buyers like @pflemon, which shows a willingness to engage and assist potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters, such as @dough96 and @PiperStu, suggested improvements that could enhance the car's condition, such as fixing the passenger window and rear brakes to make it more drivable. @gord26 expressed curiosity about the car after returning from Florida, which indicates interest but no commitment. The seller, @Saturday18, has clarified that the radio does not work but provided background information about its status before it stopped functioning, demonstrating transparency about the car's condition.
Negative: @gord26 highlighted a concern regarding the brakes, questioning why they haven't been installed despite having the necessary parts, implying that this could impact the car's sale value. @gord26 and @BlitzLead both pointed out issues with the window track and brakes, suggesting that these repairs could improve buyer confidence. Additionally, there's mention of a medical setback for the seller, which presents a somewhat negative context for the sale, as they can no longer work on the car, contributing to a sense of urgency.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the performance and beauty of the vehicle, with @CarCrazyRDM describing it as beautiful and @peterjjohnson labeling it a 'choice' example. @DieselM333 highlighted its versatility, referring to it as the best ‘do everything’ car on the planet, while @BigWinner, whose wife drives a similar model, fondly recounted the comfort and enjoyment the car brings to their family life. @LGGreens expressed appreciation for the vehicle's color, noting it as eye-catching. The combination of luxury, power, and everyday usability received universal acclaim among enthusiasts, suggesting it holds a special place in the hearts of its owners.
Neutral: The comments reflect a variety of opinions regarding the features and maintenance of the vehicle. @FantasyJunction, the seller, elaborated on the car's impressive capabilities and mentioned the extended service warranty, assuring potential buyers about maintenance aspects. Questions regarding specific features like the existence of 'Drift Mode' and heated steering wheel were also raised, with @stev0001 and @Beeshay16 seeking confirmation on whether such options were included. Overall, discussion on features was balanced with acknowledgments about the complexities involved in high-performance vehicles, particularly in reference to maintenance and the importance of service warranties.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming positivity, some comments raised concerns about the potential for high repair costs and maintenance issues. @shamansky shared a challenging experience with their older model, detailing multiple failures and the wear on their vehicle, while highlighting their continued affection for it. @twist-a-grip mentioned concerns over a known issue with the rear-main seal, indicating a previous experience that led to reluctance in purchasing another AMG vehicle. Such comments underscore the reality of owning high-performance cars, where maintenance can become a significant consideration for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Various commenters express overwhelming admiration for the 1998 Porsche 911 Carrera 4S, frequently describing it as a stunning gem and a work of art. Commenters like @Yamadude68 and @Releaseyourfish911 highlight its rarity and potential for record-breaking value, asserting that future owners will possess something truly special. The car's low mileage and excellent build quality receive commendations from @fharv5126 and @cloudscope, who reference their past experiences with cars of similar pedigree, further endorsing the vehicle's desirability and the appeal for collectors.
Neutral: Comments reflect mixed perspectives on the vehicle's high MSRP and its investment potential. @thegrayman and @dkghac engage in discussions about the car's purchase price and how it compares to inflation over the years, while also considering the value for collectors. Observations about the unique specifications and the rarity of the C4S model, as mentioned by @Joemagic and @Jacksunoco, indicate a general acknowledgment of its status among Porsche enthusiasts without overly emotional responses.
Negative: A few comments express skepticism regarding the car's condition or the feasibility of its investment value. @hector13 jokingly questions whether the odometer is real due to the impossibly low mileage, while @mgernhar critiques certain aesthetic choices in the car's interior. Such comments reveal a cautious viewpoint on whether the car should be driven given its collectible status, with some suggesting it may be better preserved for appreciation rather than use.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous comments highlight the unique attributes and features of the 1998 Dodge Ram 2500 Laramie SLT Quad Cab V10 4×4. @shadylane particularly praises the V10 engine, stating it is the best truck engine Chrysler ever made, also noting its impressive power and efficiency when compared to diesel alternatives. @Davypig expresses gratitude for the no-reserve auction format, pointing out that such an approach should be standard. Overall, the truck is regarded as rare and potentially a future collector's item due to its limited production, as highlighted by @WCD2020 (The Seller), who underscores its exceptional condition and upgrades, including a full restoration and modern enhancements.
Neutral: Comments reflect a balanced view of the Dodge Ram's historical significance, particularly with the introduction of the Quad Cab in 1998, which was praised for allowing improved access to the rear seating area. @TexasD-90 asks about the suspension details, indicating a practical concern for potential buyers, while several users engage in a discussion about earlier models and variants of the Ram, showcasing the broader context of the vehicle's categorization among its peers. @1gamedog compliments the visual presentation of the auction, which contributes to the truck's overall allure without detracting from the vehicle's substantive qualities.
Negative: Some questions raised highlight concerns about potential issues with the truck, including @WISCOPAR's inquiry about the condition of the dashboard, suggesting a possibility of wear that might not align with the overall presentation of the vehicle. Additionally, @TexasD-90 expresses uncertainty regarding the quality of the suspension modifications made to the truck prior to sale, hinting at worries about buyer satisfaction with aftermarket changes. @TreborPJ also raises questions about a specific detail in the vehicle's setup, revealing a degree of apprehension about the truck's readiness and functionality, thus adding to the critical analysis of its mechanical integrity.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the unique design and charm of the Zimmer Quicksilver, a vehicle crafted on a Pontiac Fiero chassis. @jantheman expressed enthusiasm, mentioning, "Cool Fiero! Love this. GLWA," highlighting the creative transformation that makes it distinctive. Users like @Blake1995 and @NextLife praised its imaginative build, comparing it favorably to luxury vehicles and emphasizing its quirky allure, with @NextLife articulating excitement about its visibility at car events. Many commenters expressed admiration for the craftsmanship and rarity of the vehicle, noting that it deserves recognition and love, as seen in @MikeFiftyNine's comment about its 1980s style and rarity.
Neutral: Several comments provided insights into the construction and history of the Zimmer Quicksilver, with detailed discussions about its features and parts sourced from various GM models. @deloreanguy clarified aspects of its design, explaining how it fits the definition of a coachbuilt car with custom bodywork on a common chassis, including historical production notes. Additionally, users shared technical details about the vehicle’s assembly and maintenance challenges, such as the temperature gauge issue mentioned by @JerryB1, who also offered to share restoration insights alongside the vehicle. The discussion was informative, with users like @jsadamski expressing interest in learning more about its unique configuration and production numbers.
Negative: Despite the general positivity, some comments raised concerns about specific aspects of the Zimmer Quicksilver's condition and authenticity. For instance, @Knuckles-R-Busted questioned the fitting of the A-pillar interior trim, indicating possible assembly or alignment issues. Similarly, @deloreanguy expressed doubts about the appropriateness of a replacement temperature gauge found by the seller, underscoring the potential misrepresentation of parts. @Icecreammatt noted a lack of appeal regarding storage under the hood, which suggests mixed feelings about its functional aspects compared to its design. Overall, while the fandom is evident, some critiques highlight the need for careful attention to detail.
|
 |
Positive: @jSd82263 (The Seller) mentioned that the vehicle handles exceptionally well on the road, providing a smooth and comfortable ride. Commenters praised its reliability and fuel efficiency, noting that it has consistently performed well, even after several years of use. Features such as the spacious interior and advanced safety systems were also highlighted as major selling points, with many users expressing satisfaction over these attributes.
Neutral: Some comments from @jSd82263 (The Seller) indicated that while the vehicle has many strong points, it may not appeal to everyone. A few commenters pointed out that the design may seem outdated to some, but they acknowledged that the vehicle still meets the basic requirements for functionality and comfort. The resale value was also discussed, with varying opinions on whether it holds up well over time compared to other models in its class.
Negative: Several negative comments emerged around issues with maintenance and parts availability. @jSd82263 (The Seller) did acknowledge that some users have experienced difficulties finding certain replacement parts, which could lead to increased repair costs. Additionally, there were criticisms regarding the infotainment system, with users reporting it to be less intuitive than competing models and that it requires frequent updates, which can be frustrating.
|
 |
Positive: @vnaar123 expressed a strong affection for Mugello and a desire for a 488 Spider in that color, indicating an appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics. @Vizsla described the car as stunning, showcasing an admiration for its visual appeal. @SeptillionStars proclaimed the Ferrari 488 to be beautiful, highlighting its increasing value, encouraging others to acquire one before prices escalate further. @sampelligrino praised the car's specification and build quality, specifically mentioning the attractive standard non-forged wheel. Overall, there is a shared excitement about the car's design and potential investment value.
Neutral: Concerns about the car's maintenance and repair history were raised by several commenters. @Steve911GT3 inquired about a headliner replacement, claiming to have seen similar issues with other Ferrari models. @GOBryan asked about the completed engine repairs and the quality of service, emphasizing the need for transparency in the car's maintenance records. @SPSGarage sought clarification on the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the PPF and potential defects, enhancing the conversation around the car's protective measures and preprocessing.
Negative: Comments also reflected some skepticism about the vehicle's condition. @SPSGarage questioned the state of the front splitter and the need for a new bumper, suggesting potential concerns about the car's physical state. @GOBryan expressed worry about the quality of the PPF, referencing a past friend's negative experience with a similar product. @GOBryan's emotional plea against flipping the car for profit captured a sense of frustration, stemming from his long-term admiration for the vehicle, highlighting a deeper narrative of longing and the sentimental connection many potential buyers feel towards the Ferrari 488.
|
 |
Positive: @tomgarcin highlights the wonder of cars and personal customization, recalling his fond experience with a Renault 5 Turbo II. @ProfGriff recognizes the vehicle as a suitable project B, suggesting that its value may not be high but emphasizes the enjoyment potential. @Sully52 describes the vehicle as a 'pretty clean little B' and looks forward to fun driving, while also playfully requesting driving videos to gauge the experience.
Neutral: @bouli37 (The Seller) assures potential buyers that the car is drivable and mentions the need to replace the battery, expressing uncertainty about its overall dependability based on limited neighborhood driving. He also explains adjustments made during restoration that were left unaddressed as they did not bother him much, stating that corrections are easy. Regarding rust, the seller believes all rusted parts were replaced and an undercoat was applied, ensuring a solid base before restoration.
Negative: @Tom_R points out the unaddressed gap between the taillights and rear bumper as a conversion oversight, although he considers it a minor issue. @merc5340 raises concerns about the ride height not being addressed and inquires about potential rust on typical problematic areas, seeking additional pictures for clarity. @Linedancer expresses doubt regarding the car's driveability and dependability due to the absence of running videos, while @colbob questions the lack of photos showcasing the roadster with the top down, suggesting an incomplete presentation.
|
 |
Positive: @MattyGatch expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its beauty and intriguing features, mentioning that it likely surpassed the original MSRP with a manual transmission. @BlitzLead stated that he believes this model will become highly collectible. Additionally, @Nehmaiz commented on the stunning quality of the vehicle, indicating that it includes desirable features that were originally a part of the package.
Neutral: @tstaver, the seller, provided detailed information about the car, highlighting that it comes with all original accessories in pristine condition, including a Porsche watch still wrapped in protective material. He invited potential bidders to contact him for any inquiries and reassured them about the details of the tires, acknowledging an initial mistake and providing accurate information about their manufacture date. @Dr_Outback confirmed the date codes of the tires based on the images they viewed.
Negative: @Blizzard340 shared a personal preference, stating that the black color of the exterior is a deal-breaker for him, based on his own experience with a similar model. @DNJONES suggested that although the mileage is low, having a DME (Digital Motor Electronics) would be a worthy addition, indicating a lack of certain features that could enhance the vehicle's appeal. Overall, some comments hinted at doubts regarding the vehicle's upkeep and features.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and historical significance. @ekmcmullen emphasizes the car's well-preserved state and the legendary nature of the Knight sleeve valve engine. Other users, like @Dcmcc and @buellwinkle, praise the car as a rare survivor, appreciating its original upholstery and elegant design. The excitement for the new owner is palpable, with @RidleysRides noting that it shows the love it deserves and mentioning the spaciousness for family use.
Neutral: @ekmcmullen, who is also the seller, engages positively with the community and offers updates about the auction process. They acknowledge the interest in driving videos, which had been delayed due to weather conditions, but encourage participants to stay tuned for future updates. Commenters share personal anecdotes that connect them to the history and mechanics of the car, demonstrating a shared passion for automotive history.
Negative: Some comments touch on the challenges of the Knight sleeve valve engine, with @TheOMDude remarking on its reputation for requiring more oil, suggesting the potential for maintenance concerns. However, no specific negative comments about the car's condition or performance were highlighted, indicating that the overall sentiment remained favorable despite the mechanical note.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and historical significance, highlighting its classic two-tone color scheme and overall beauty. @Tburgett noted that it's a 'nice clean Bronco' that should sell well, while @Jbrown89 exclaimed 'O hell yeah!' regarding the standout design of the two-tone bullnoses. @Michael55 conveyed enthusiasm, suggesting that a potential buyer would be interested in acquiring it quickly. Additionally, @Jghoghunter called it a 'gorgeous bronco' and praised its transformation from plain to striking with a beautiful red shade, indicating its appeal to enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the technical aspects of the vehicle, particularly regarding the transmission. @Todd_Z responded to @Jghoghunter's inquiry about the transmission type, clarifying that it is indeed a C6 three-speed automatic. This technical detail was supported by @Broncos4ever who confirmed the transmission type based on the VIN tag. There were also requests for additional information, such as the nature of the upfitter switches and whether the seats and console are original, with @HouseofBricksSTL posing relevant questions that the seller, @Hdecker83, attempted to address.
Negative: A couple of comments raised concerns about missing components and potential inaccuracies regarding the vehicle's features. @Fordblueblood inquired about the whereabouts of the tubular side steps, indicating possible modifications or omissions that could detract from the vehicle's appeal. Additionally, @Mattclayprice pointed out inconsistencies regarding the introduction of the AOD transmission, suggesting some confusion in the discussions surrounding the vehicle's specifications. @Hdecker83 responded to these queries but highlighted ongoing uncertainties, which may lead to buyer reservations.
|
 |
Positive: @Scott68GTO describes the vehicle as "absolutely gorgeous," while @PontiacForLife expresses a strong yearning for a similar model, hinting at nostalgia and attachment. @brew_man appreciates the underrated color combined with a black interior and commends its manual transmission with an overdrive gear. @hairyolds finds the color appealing, noting that it is not usually associated with a GTO. @Uberfun highlights the striking color combination and original upholstery, emphasizing its uniqueness among replicas. The seller, @thethrottlestop, reinforces the vehicle's quality and reliability, stating it runs beautifully and looks great at car shows. Overall, there's a strong sense of admiration and nostalgia among commenters.
Neutral: @a990dna shares a personal story of missing out on purchasing a similar car in the past, illustrating a blend of longing and regret associated with the GTO. @OGm5 questions the specifics of the vehicle's drum brakes, indicating that while they may lack knowledge, they are curious about the car's authenticity. @RamblinGarage suggests visiting @thethrottlestop for a different automotive event, which shows an interest in community involvement. Commenters are engaging with each other over details of the car and related experiences, reflecting a shared interest in classic vehicles.
Negative: The comments do not include any explicitly negative sentiments towards the vehicle itself; however, @a990dna's account of not being able to purchase the car due to financial constraints may imply a missed opportunity that some could view negatively, as it reflects regret and disappointment. Additionally, @OGm5's uncertainty about the car's specifications could hint at a lack of confidence in its authenticity, which could be seen as a critique. Overall, the conversation remains overwhelmingly positive, with minimal negativity expressed.
|
1980 Triumph TR7 Convertible 30th Anniversary Edition 5-Speed
TPVDJ8AT202438
Lot 233340
Private Party
 |
Positive: The 1980 Triumph TR7, 30th Year Anniversary Edition, is described as a nicely cared for and maintained vehicle that retains its original charm. @sliproc praises its original condition and complete history, suggesting it's a great entry-level classic sports car. @JohnHJr (The Seller) highlights the car's enjoyable driving experience and its unique features like the wedge shape, pop-up headlights, and a 5-speed manual transmission, making it stand out in the classic car market.
Neutral: Overall, comments about the vehicle include technical insights and observations regarding its performance. @Dr.T notes that switching to an R134 a/c system requires adjustments to the expansion valve, while @Midengineracer and @Hardwhistle discuss the possible reasons for the vehicle's high idle, with speculation regarding the choke or deceleration valves. The discussion about its historical significance as a 30th Anniversary Edition further informs potential buyers about its background and value.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about the vehicle’s operation, particularly the idle speed which is reported to be around 2000 rpm. @KarPie and @sliproc express doubts about the effect of the FASD on the idle, suggesting it may not be functioning correctly. @Midengineracer questions the abrupt shutdown of the vehicle during operation, noting it may obscure known issues, which could deter potential buyers looking for a dependable classic car.
|
 |
Positive: There are numerous positive remarks about the vehicle, highlighting its stunning spec and overall beauty. @Oldhockyplayr mentioned the gorgeous aesthetics of the car both inside and out, while @70_duster praised the photography and expressed love for the AMG V8. @4thewin referred to the vehicle as a future collectible, suggesting that many would look back in time regretting not purchasing such a well-equipped machine. @mduel86 and @1morechance also commended the car's beauty, with @wildhairuma sharing their own experience driving a similar vehicle, describing it as an absolute thrill. Overall, the comments reflect admiration for the car's design, features, and potential.
Neutral: There were some inquiries about the vehicle's history and specifications. @Jimaras asked about the remaining factory warranty, to which @2FAM (The Seller) confirmed that the warranty lasts until November. Additionally, @WLACA requested a detailed provenance of the car, seeking clarity on its previous ownership and why it required reconditioning. @Cars4Me13 was curious about the reconditioning done on the car and whether it had paint protection film (PPF). @Spudman14 and @p-38 also posed questions about the window sticker price and warranty extension, respectively, indicating a moderate interest in the vehicle's background and specifics.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, there were a few concerns regarding the vehicle's brief ownership history and the reason for its reconditioning with under 600 miles. @Oldhockyplayr expressed curiosity about why the first owner sold it so quickly, and @1morechance echoed this by inquiring for additional information on the reconditioning at such low mileage. @BloodDragon mentioned that while the car was a nice drive, they found it to be somewhat slow, which may be a disappointment for those looking for higher performance. These questions and comparisons suggest a slight unease among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's past and overall performance.
|
4,900-Mile 2023 Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack Widebody Convertible Conversion
2C3CDZFJ1PH680913
Lot 233196
Private Party
 |
Positive: @georgepehanick loves the white seats in the vehicle and finds it beautiful. @e9er appreciates the car's color combination and is a fan of the 'Cuda conversion, indicating enthusiasm for the aesthetic changes. @Bfeasel1 expresses admiration for the overall look of the car, questioning why Dodge didn't manufacture convertibles themselves. @Phoneboy1 has seen the car in person and described it as an amazing machine, highlighting a positive firsthand experience.
Neutral: Several commenters raise questions about the 'Cuda conversion and its feasibility in returning to an original OEM configuration, such as @Paul6200 and @baysfull, who inquire about whether the conversion was factory-ordered and warranty-related. @engineCo345 discusses concerns over needing parts or service after the conversion. Additionally, @eldonchas provides context on the conversion process, mentioning that Dodge did not build convertibles and that cars were sent to Drop Top for conversions. @brinsd points out that the CarFax may not reflect the conversion, indicating a complex background on the vehicle's history.
Negative: @oldjonny is dismissive of the 'Cuda conversion, expressing that a 'Cuda and Challenger should remain distinct. @TandTK shows frustration over the seller's lack of responsiveness to inquiries, questioning the selling strategy. There is concern about the quality of work done by Drop Top, with @Bigmann sharing a negative experience related to electrical issues and detailing problems with a previous car converted by another company. @MadmadDog expresses outright disappointment and decides to withdraw from the auction, demonstrating dissatisfaction with the overall situation.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the Factory Five Racing MK4 Roadster's stunning design and overall build quality. @dj_walls2424 noted the beautiful photos, especially highlighting the engine bay and floors. @Scarlet65 mentioned the joy of driving the car, describing it as a lot of fun despite their preference for dual roll hoops. The vehicle is said to have an incredible presence that draws a crowd, providing a charming and enjoyable driving experience. @kraftdrive even mentioned seeing the car in person, noting how nicely the paint showed and how well it started from a cold start.
Neutral: Some comments sought clarification or additional information regarding the vehicle's features and specifications. @Jmoffroad66 inquired if the car could accommodate taller drivers, while @rych232 asked about paperwork related to Blueprint, documentation for the engine, and the rear end gear ratio. @CaptMiggs also requested information on the engine serial number, with sellers responding to these inquiries with reasonable explanations about what documentation is available.
Negative: There were hints of skepticism among certain commenters. @T1934 questioned if all potential bugs had been worked out, showing concern about reliability. @Tigers196884 mentioned that there might be better color combinations, indicating a personal preference against the current choice. Lastly, @1krazygravy brought up a potential concern regarding the hood scoop alignment, and @kraftdrive pointed out a possible issue with the left side of the dash, implying that some buyers might have reservations about the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Umc2101 (The Seller) expresses excitement about selling the Cayenne Turbo and assures potential buyers that it is a super clean and well-maintained vehicle. They highlight personal ownership of the truck during college, describing it as having been driven reliably on long trips. The seller assures that the car is in excellent condition and confirms that the button panel is working as designed, along with indicating that the previous owner performed differential services and that the minor accident involved only a tap that has been properly repaired.
Neutral: Several commenters seek clarification on issues related to vehicle maintenance and condition. @buckmeister2 inquires about the repairs from recent accidents and whether the fuel readings have been checked after the IDP intake installation. @davefon asks about the service warning related to the headlight beam adjustment and the number of key fobs available. @YIWHINE stresses the importance of documentation regarding the transfer case and differential oil changes, while @habanerott points out a potential issue with a button panel in the photos, which the seller addressed but left some questions about the vehicle's history unresolved.
Negative: @buckmeister2 and @davefon express concerns about the lack of information and transparency surrounding the vehicle, specifically regarding accident repairs and the condition of the car. @davefon even expresses doubt that the auction will meet the seller's hopes due to the perceived poor condition. Furthermore, @YIWHINE warns about the potential costs associated with the transfer case and suggests that the vehicle is being sold immediately after crashes without adequate disclosure, adding to the negative perception of the auction process.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm about the condition and aesthetics of the 2001 Mercedes-Benz SL500. @thunderboltmotors, the seller, highlights that the car is presented in outstanding condition for its age, describing it as a beautiful low-mileage example that shines in the current R129 market. Other users, such as @zildjian11, appreciate the car's sleek triple-black appearance and the included AMG sport package, indicating that it presents well in the photos. @Robson1 shares a positive sentiment after owning a similar vehicle for 16 years, reinforcing the car's desirability among enthusiasts.
Neutral: There are several questions and observations made by commenters regarding specific details about the vehicle's condition and functionality. @cpocpo points out the crooked emblem and expresses a desire for updates on the front grill and hood badge. Technical inquiries about the AC system's reliability and the status of power seats and windows are raised by @bitballoon, which @thunderboltmotors responds to by confirming that all systems function as they should. Various other users ask for clarification on missing components, such as keys and an antenna grommet, indicating a proactive interest in ensuring all aspects of the vehicle are covered before purchasing.
Negative: A few concerns are voiced regarding the vehicle's overall condition and potential issues. @Propofolpusher raises a worry about the car not passing California emissions, to which @thunderboltmotors assures that it will pass if smogged for sale in California. @Robson1, however, expresses skepticism, suggesting that someone might pay too much for a vehicle potentially not worth its listing price. Additionally, some comments hint at possible maintenance concerns such as the climate control LCD screen not functioning properly according to @BenzBoat, which are critical notes for prospective buyers to consider.
|
 |
Positive: @Singerirv describes the vehicle as a "beautiful, clean S1". @JosephAuto refers to it as a "classic beauty" that people can admire endlessly, while @AutoTechLLC praises the XKE as "Stunningly Beautiful" and highlights how it looks and drives with agility and balance, especially the Series 1s. @68_BRG_xke_ots adds to the joy by mentioning the car is "gorgeous" and ready to drive and enjoy, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. Additionally, @mw206 (The Seller) acknowledges the kind words and confirms the car is indeed a beautiful example with no oil leaks, which seems to impress potential buyers.
Neutral: Comments around potential concerns involve the vehicle's design features and minor discrepancies. @c2kid notes that the oil leak is a major concern, but expresses admiration for the car's beauty while questioning the exact location of the leak. @Bug36T57 and @offsideundo discuss the car's headlamp design, highlighting the transitional nature of the Series 1.5, with @offsideundo providing historical context about the E-Types. Meanwhile, @chrkevcol raises a question about the authenticity of the body number, to which @mw206 (The Seller) provides a detailed response explaining a possible transcription error that Jaguar Heritage corrected.
Negative: Despite the overall admiration for the vehicle, there are some concerns regarding potential oil leaks, particularly voiced by @Ob1canobi, @c2kid, and @martybrin. @AutoTechLLC highlights the common issue of rear main seals in XKEs, mentioning that repairs can be labor-intensive. @Trippin questions the bonnet photos' accuracy, implying a possible issue with its latch. Overall, while the aesthetic and driving qualities of the vehicle are praised, the potential for mechanical issues raises some caution among the community.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's design and driving experience. @67tr4a reminisced about the enjoyable handling and performance of the TR4 in comparison to other cars in its class. @Mid-EngineEnthusiast praised its aesthetic appeal, suggesting it looked nicer than their own sports cars. @Alfetta70s also appreciated its honest patina and ease of maintenance, recommending it for regular use. Additionally, @jimlichter (The Seller) highlighted the efforts made to showcase the car, including posting additional undercarriage photos, which many in the community welcomed.
Neutral: Discussion around the auction setting included mixed sentiments about the seller's approach in presenting the vehicle. @mike_747 remarked on the challenges of selling a convertible in winter, while @dzguy pointed out the significance of the 'No Reserve' auction format, suggesting that interest may remain high. The varied perspectives highlighted ownership experiences and expectations, with some wanting clarity on the vehicle's title changes and modifiable aspects, such as the car's idling speed.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition and the seller's transparency. @trracer noted the absence of quality undercarriage photos and emphasized the importance of strong visuals for potential bidders, echoing sentiments from other commenters who expressed skepticism about the frame's condition. @Jarka called for clear pictures to address queries about rust and structural integrity. Additionally, @dzguy suggested the seller either couldn't or wouldn't provide essential details to secure the sale, indicating it might hinder the value of the auction significantly.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally appreciate the car's unique design and wrap with many praising its aesthetic appeal. @SemiTruckOTTO remarked on the impressive lighting in the engine bay, while @Edmtwentyone and @Ahuko highlighted their love for the wrap, indicating it enhances the vehicle's overall look. @The_Dude_Abides expressed a fondness for the car, calling it 'interesting,' and @Kishote noted the wrap's stylish ombre effect. The vehicle's visual transformation through wrapping was further emphasized by @shallowguy, who recognized how it altered the car's vibe, contributing to a positive reception among potential buyers.
Neutral: Some comments reflect inquiries and discussions regarding the condition and service history of the car. @Johnnyv1970 raised questions about a dent in the left quarter panel, seeking clarity on its repairability and warranty status. @enk_andrew also inquired about any extended service contracts and whether common issues had been addressed, while @Jordan600lt asked about the process of obtaining import compliance, indicating a need for more information for prospective buyers. The seller, @Haseebshkh, provided detailed responses, addressing concerns about the dent and warranty expiration, which suggests a proactive approach to customer inquiries.
Negative: A few comments brought up concerns regarding potential issues with the vehicle. @Johnnyv1970's repeated questioning about the dent highlighted some uncertainty regarding the car's condition. Furthermore, @Majorfomo expressed concern about the tariff costs associated with importing the vehicle, suggesting financial apprehensions that may deter potential buyers. It was noted that the car's previous warranty expired, which could be viewed as a downside by some. Overall, while many comments were positive, there was a presence of caution and critical inquiries that could impact perceptions of the vehicle.
|
427-Powered, Ex–Burt Bacharach 1966 Chevrolet Corvette Convertible 6-Speed
194676S109365
Lot 233346
Dealer
 |
Positive: Comments on the vehicle showcase a deep appreciation for its connection to Burt Bacharach, a legendary composer whose love for cars is well-known. Commenters express excitement about the unique opportunity to own a celebrity-owned classic, with many reminiscing about their favorite songs from Bacharach. @SuretyAgent and @CarDogThreePedals highlight the joys of combining Bacharach's music with driving the Corvette, creating a nostalgic atmosphere that resonates with fans of both the artist and the car. Overall, the vehicle is not only viewed as a classic performance machine but as a piece of musical history that brings back fond memories for many.
Neutral: Several comments inquire about the car's technical details and history, particularly its modifications over the years. @Avvocato and @Oldcar provide valuable insights into the car's changes, such as its original color and engine specifications, while @Symbolic_International (The Seller) clarifies these modifications and shares the car’s dyno performance data, illustrating its capability as a performance vehicle. Commenters express curiosity about the rarity of celebrity ownership and how that impacts value, with @JohnF1966 questioning the connection between celebrity status and car desirability, leading to thoughtful discussions about market trends.
Negative: Some comments reveal skepticism around the celebrity ownership aspect of the Corvette. @JohnF1966 and others critique the added value given to celebrity-owned cars, arguing that it should primarily depend on the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @Kie jokes about the pricing of the car, suggesting it might not be affordable to most. @Fleche_dOr humorously laments their inability to purchase the car, indicating a mix of desire and frustration about the current auction dynamics. There are also concerns about the modifications diminishing the car’s historical authenticity and appeal for purists.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle, a pristine Aston Martin V8 Vantage GT, has garnered significant praise from both the seller @Symbolic_International and former owners. @Valiantjim expressed admiration for the car's chassis, engine, and overall aesthetics, emphasizing a preference for it over competitors such as the 911. @Blair780 shared a positive sentiment about owning a similar model and assured potential bidders that they would not be disappointed with the experience. Moreover, @Ajamjar noted the meticulous care and exceptional driving experience they had when personally checking out the vehicle during the previous auction. The seller indicated that the car has been well-cared for, with original records preserved, and inspected components indicating minimal wear.
Neutral: During the auction process, @Symbolic_International made it clear that there would be no reserve price for the car, implying a straightforward bidding process. The seller also mentioned some limitations due to inclement weather, affecting the ability to provide a spirited driving video. Additionally, there was an encouraging tone from prospective bidders like @Misanthrope, who appreciated the detailed responses provided by the seller about the vehicle's service history, indicating a high level of transparency in the auction process.
Negative: There were very few negative comments about the vehicle itself, although @Misanthrope raised a question regarding appropriate service intervals, reflecting a concern that some potential bidders might have about any overlooked maintenance. However, @Symbolic_International reassured bidders that the vehicle had received all necessary service on schedule, which seemed to satisfy the inquiry. Overall, the feedback leaned heavily towards the positive, with no major criticisms highlighted in the discussion.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous praises for its meticulous restoration and uniqueness. @Tearaway (The Seller) highlighted that the car was restored by John Fortney, known for his dedication to the Italia legacy. Commenters like @Fynmere expressed that it is one of the finest examples of the Italia Spyder on the market, pointing out top-notch improvements such as the 6-speed manual upgrade. Enthusiasts like @ninerfan shared their admiration for the car's stunning perfection, stating it could easily win 'Best of Show' at car shows, emphasizing its rarity and pristine condition.
Neutral: Several comments dealt with inquiries and general observations about the car. @TRibute sought clarification regarding upgrades to the front suspension, while @Bahaba0 asked about headroom with the top up. @kdf38 raised a concern regarding a mismatch between the title and the car, and @GMsportscars speculated about the vehicle's horsepower based on the engine specifications. These inquiries reflect a deep interest in the car's specifications and history, showing that potential buyers are engaged but also looking for detailed information.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive comments, there were a few critiques and points of concern. @Bacchus33 noted a noticeable rattle during a driving video, which turned out to be caused by a GoPro camera installed for filming. @Smiley1956 mentioned handling concerns, indicating the car's performance dynamics could be a potential downside. Additionally, @kdf38 and @fastdrvr engaged in a discussion about pricing, suggesting some uncertainty regarding the vehicle's valuation in the current market, which might be a point of concern for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commentators expressed their admiration for the Lamborghini LM002, emphasizing its unique features and historical significance. @boaboyoz described it as an 'AWESOME sight,' praising the vehicle's coolness and the seller's efforts. @70_duster highlighted its performance, noting the V12 engine and 5-speed transmission as indicators of a truly ahead-of-its-time SUV. @CarDogThreePedals shared a rich history of the LM002's engineering, calling it an over-engineered and heavy-duty Italian automobile with an unmatched presence. Others, like @GDogg and @RundeepResources, celebrated its blend of brashness and elegance, asserting it exemplifies a peak SUV experience.
Neutral: Commentators provided various insights about the LM002's specifications and legacy. @Symbolic_International, the seller, detailed the model's history, production numbers, and unique features catered for the American market. He also shared updates on the ongoing auction process, mentioning other vehicles up for sale, which illustrates the vehicle's place in a broader collector context. Several commenters noted their personal experiences or connections with the LM002, such as @wg1958 reminiscing about using an LM002 for a photoshoot, while @Oregon_Motor_Company recounted a past sales experience, indicating vibrancy in the vehicle's collector community.
Negative: Not all feedback was entirely positive, with some commenters expressing skepticism. @natew51 admitted struggling to find the LM002 appealing at first glance but showed a willingness to learn more about its allure. @BMWE90Guy humorously pointed out the contrast between the car and typical Lamborghini expectations, suggesting that it might not be what people envision when they think of the brand. Additionally, @Michael_Blue expressed concerns about the aftermarket alterations, specifically regarding the exhaust system, which raised questions about compliance with regulations. Some users like @rhyno attempted to clarify misinformation regarding the vehicle's tires and specifications, suggesting a level of scrutiny among prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's condition and its aesthetic appeal. @Zeusmonster noted it was a beautiful car that likely deserves limited driving, perhaps only for car shows. @DKeng appreciated the low mileage over the past two years, suggesting this is a desirable feature for preserving the car. @choicedealsnc2017 praised it as one of the best, while @Jamvo referred to it as a survivor, and @Detroit_Iron emphasized its mint condition, reminding him of the Ford dealer's selection from the early 90s.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged with the seller on specific details about the car. @JRPJR raised concerns about potential scuffs on the passenger door, to which @Insseeme (The Seller) reassured that touch-ups would suffice. @BidderGG inquired about the stereo's fit with the cubby trim, leading the seller to clarify the stereo was replaced and there were no issues with its functionality. @nolyaw requested detailed photos of VIN tags and a verification of the windshield, indicating an interest in documents and authenticity but without outright skepticism.
Negative: Amid the praise, a few commenters queried details that raised concerns. @svt93cobra pointed out an inconsistency regarding the antenna, which prompted @Insseeme (The Seller) to clarify it was indeed original. @Z282SLO acknowledged the rarity of the car but noted confusion about the battery choice and suggested a Marti Report for authenticity. Additionally, @nolyaw pressed for paint meter readings and information on the windshield, suggesting a need for thorough verification, which may imply some apprehension about the vehicle's claims.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight strong admiration for the 1977 Porsche 911 Turbo Carrera being listed, with many users expressing their excitement and appreciation for the car's condition and original features. Commentators such as @Bobbity and @Lennyv123 described the vehicle as 'absolutely delicious' and 'insanely gorgeous,' reflecting a widespread enthusiasm and aesthetic appreciation. The car's slick top and lack of a sunroof were noted positively by several users, with @Caymanorcarrera remarking that it should 'get a whole bunch of love,' indicating the desirability of this feature among enthusiasts. The seller, @the_patina_group, emphasized the car's overall well-maintained condition, which resonates well with the audience, further driving their positive reactions.
Neutral: There were some neutral inquiries and observations regarding the vehicle's features and past modifications. @70boss302 raised a question about why the engine had been rebuilt, which @the_patina_group clarified was actually a reseal due to leaks, suggesting that the seller is responsive and engaged with potential buyers. The comments also included a mix of reflections on the car's aesthetics and functionality, as illustrated by @jww427's suggestion for a potential exhaust upgrade, hinting at ways to enhance its performance further, though lacking any strong negative connotation.
Negative: On the negative side, there were few concerns raised, primarily focused on the potential for needing modifications to enhance performance, as seen in @jww427's comment regarding adding a quality exhaust to reduce lag. However, these concerns do not seem to detract significantly from the overall appreciation for the car among commentators. Potential bidders like @jimerl expressed disappointment in not being able to bid at their intended amount, revealing some frustration among interested parties over bidding logistics. Overall, while some issues and questions arose, they did not overshadow the overwhelmingly positive reception of the vehicle.
|
Original-Owner 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Convertible 6-Speed
1G1YY32G215116062
Lot 233257
Private Party
 |
Positive: @LasVegasGreg mentioned that a manual C5 is among the best options for a sports car, highlighting the appealing color and natural interior of the vehicle in question. @jimjim complimented the interior, stating it may be the nicest C5 interior he has seen, praising the color combination and the quality of leather. @RobinMous expressed admiration for the Corvette C5, calling it a stunning vehicle and a true icon, wishing luck for the auction.
Neutral: @RFblock, the seller, confirmed the availability of the front cover plate and original floor mats, stating they have never been used. Responses from potential buyers included inquiries about the vehicle's maintenance records and status of the vibration damper fix. The seller also mentioned he has several other Corvettes and felt it was time to sell this one since it has not been driven much recently, indicating the car is in good condition with very few miles on the tires.
Negative: Several comments raised concerns about the tires' age, with @Uberpower questioning the seller about the tire's date codes, suggesting they may be closer to 7.5 years old. @Uberpower also expressed frustration regarding the seller's availability to answer questions during the auction due to being currently out of the country. @jimscorvettes questioned the value of the car compared to its Blue Book price and pointed out potential concerns regarding the tires, hinting that the bidding situation seemed misguided.
|
 |
Positive: @testa1986 mentioned that their 2015 Fiat 500 has been a great car and very reliable. @scc1962 (The Seller) highlighted that the Fiat 500 Pop being auctioned is exceptionally clean, well cared for, and has low mileage with only 21,000 original miles. The car's exterior and interior condition is praised with mentions of no dents, dings, or scratches, and the original factory paint appearing deep and glossy. Additionally, the vehicle drives nicely and smoothly, maintaining its responsiveness as it did when new.
Neutral: Comments from @scc1962 (The Seller) included details about the JVC head unit, which, while lacking a CD player, offers Bluetooth and compatibility with modern features like Android and CarPlay. @LoTex expressed anticipation for a driving video, while others like @jpr noted the unique nature of the car being one of the few Fiat 500 Pops available for sale, indicating a level of interest among the bidders. @HotDoug shared their thoughts on the vehicle's appearance and features, commenting on the aesthetics of the interior and exterior without making strong observations on performance.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @jekdohc about some grayish or white residue on the driver's headrest, which initially appeared questionable but was later clarified by @scc1962 (The Seller) as dirt that could be cleaned off. This raised doubts about the meticulousness of the car's condition, contrasting the overall positive impressions. Additionally, while some comments expressed a desire for specific technical features like a 5-speed manual transmission, this highlights a dissatisfaction among potential buyers regarding the available options of the car.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and overall quality. @Bigphillly described it as a 'great looking roadster,' while @nicko praised it as a 'beautiful car,' indicating it stands out among its peers. @Jaymerritt shared a positive personal experience with a similar model, stating they found it 'very peppy and fun to drive.' Several other comments, including those from @JT77 and @BlitzLead, reinforced the idea that the car offers significant enjoyment and value, with @JT77 encouraging skills development for future generations to appreciate such vehicles.
Neutral: The seller, @poppysclassiccarstorage, provided updates about the vehicle, including information about its condition and availability for viewing. They mentioned recent work done on the car to enhance its performance, with assurance that it is 'running even better' and ready for a new owner. @Habman expressed interest in scheduling a test drive, indicating potential future engagement from buyers, while several commenters noted logistical considerations, such as shipping difficulties for those far from Connecticut.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car's condition, particularly from @Tahoe013, who mentioned that it appears to require 'a lot of TLC.' This suggests potential buyers may need to invest additional time or resources into repairs or restoration. The comments indicate that while the frame and interior looked decent, there are aspects that need attention before the car can be fully enjoyed, hinting at a possible challenge for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Comments surrounding the vehicle highlight its attractiveness and presentation. @MikeinTN praised the car's beautiful color combination, while @SebringPV and @MarcLB1950 both expressed their admiration for the Z8, calling it a high-water mark for gas-powered roadsters due to its elegant design and fantastic driving experience. @FantasyJunction, the seller, confirmed various repairs and upgrades made to the vehicle, including the replacement of the hardtop headliner and a thorough detailing process, emphasizing their dedication to maintaining the car's aesthetics and functionality.
Neutral: Some comments sought clarification regarding specific repairs and the vehicle's condition. Several commenters, including @j393939m and @BlueBimmers, noted the limited service record available and wondered about service history and any previous adjustments made to the vehicle. Questions about the performance package and any potential strut tower deformation were raised, with @FantasyJunction providing details regarding testing and past maintenance. The seller reassured potential buyers that they are willing to accommodate inspections, and they detailed service work performed on the car over the past several years.
Negative: Concerns were raised about possible mechanical issues and maintenance history. @Randyg pointed out a previous engine noise and the history of the dash pad, suggesting potential issues with the vehicle that might need addressing. There were also inquiries about the soft top's condition and a history of frame deformation, with commenters like @MarcLB1950 expressing skepticism regarding dealers' evaluations of such issues. Additionally, @Brocket007 and @Rockabillykid brought up potential odors inside the vehicle, pointing to concerns that prospective buyers might have regarding previous use.
|
4,300-Mile 2016 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Coupe C7.R Edition 7-Speed
1G1YT2D69G5700447
Lot 233281
Private Party
 |
Positive: The 2016 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Coupe C7.R Edition has garnered enthusiastic praise from the BaT community. Commentors like @68CamaroSS396L78 described it as a 'Stunning ZO6', while @LFKScarguy referred to it as a 'masterpiece'. The auction listing itself, handled by @motivearchive, was commended for its detail and thoroughness, which adds value to the car's presentation. Many participants expressed admiration for its low mileage of 4,300 miles and recognized it as a rare find, given its special edition status. User @Plywood222222 expressed particular love for its distinctive design, highlighting the striking visual appeal of the yellow accents.
Neutral: Several commentors raised important questions about the vehicle’s features and service history. @Mrobin33 inquired about the vehicle cover's inclusion, while user @Stads69 asked about the possibility of applying paint protection film (PPF) or ceramic coating prior to delivery. The seller @motivearchive responded by confirming the cover and the service history, demonstrating a willingness to engage authentically with potential buyers. Additionally, discussions around the production numbers of black Z06s and their rarity were prevalent, with users like @Oldwood and @FishTales contributing their insights.
Negative: Despite the general positivity, there were a few critical remarks regarding aspects of the vehicle's service care. @racersnotriders pointed out perceived overcharges on some services listed in the invoices, raising concerns about the value of the maintenance. Meanwhile, @FishTales shared a personal story of engine failure with another Z06, implying potential quality issues with the model. Such comments, while not directly linked to the car being auctioned, suggest caution for buyers considering the broader implications of ownership and potential pitfalls.
|
 |
Positive: @JAB12 praised the car's phone as "Epic!" while @Rhogue described it as a "time capsule" and a "gem" due to its split rear grille specific to the 993 C2S. @JetCity993RS noted that with only 60K miles, the motor is "barely broken in", further confirming the vehicle's desirability. @Sparta72 preferred this example over the super low mile ones, emphasizing that these cars are made to drive. @spookysnakes also showed admiration for the car, complimenting the seller's taste and calling the phone "all kinds of cool."
Neutral: Comments from @SWVintage (The Seller) indicated the presence of over 20 service records on Carfax and a willingness to provide paint metering and compression testing if possible. Other inquiries by @Bcarlson1 and @wstarnes focused on maintenance records and emissions, with the seller confirming the original exhaust will accompany the car. This transparency contributed to ongoing interest in the vehicle, especially among potential buyers evaluating both the technical specifications and historical context of the car.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Paul_SJ regarding the limited maintenance records available, with questions about the minor accident reported by AutoCheck and the lack of detailed records prior to recent years. @Ryjou suggested a need for caution with the mileage, advising to "slow down" on these claims. @jimbo1964 sought information about spare parts and the original exhaust, which the seller confirmed was present but initially uncertain. Furthermore, @jerzeyboy730 remarked on the market's desirability for these vehicles but alluded to potential scarcity, hinting at possible complications pertaining to availability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the 1969 Alfa Romeo Spider Veloce, calling it a beautiful car with an impressive restoration. @simon75 and @cujoe60 noted the attractive colors, with @simon75 even sharing his emotional reaction upon seeing the vehicle. @daryl-in-delray described it as a stunning example of the model, praising the combination of the new interior and soft top, while others echoed similar sentiments, highlighting the overall excellence of the car's restoration and design. Additionally, @happythejr and @Watry commented on the effort and expense involved in restoring such a vehicle, suggesting that it deserves appreciation from potential bidders.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on specific aspects of the car, including details about the trunk seal, condition of bodywork, and fabrications related to the restoration. @rickst and @Wsby requested additional images of the underside, close-ups of critical restoration areas, and information on any blemishes or defects. The seller, @thebarnmiami, actively engaged with these queries, assuring potential buyers that they would provide more comprehensive details, including the factory color code and how the car was classified regarding its model year. @letwalesbe and @ninavich also contributed to these technical discussions, demonstrating a shared interest in the car's authenticity.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, some commenters pointed out potential flaws. @markwo1983 and @Gassermon raised concerns about the correctness of certain features, such as the emblems and fuel injection system, which they felt did not match the year's specifications. @shineon critiqued the alignment of the front turn signal lights and bumper, expressing disappointment at how a high-quality restoration could overlook such details. @okie_flats noted a visible scuff in a photo as evidence of potential mishaps during transit, while @Gassermon shared general worries about parking and exposure risks that may arise when owning a meticulously restored car. These criticisms highlight that while many appreciate the restoration, others seek further assurance of its authenticity and longevity.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @AuthenticAuctions, highlighted that the 2023 Thor 19p Sanctuary van has been used sparingly, featuring only 11,000 miles, and is in great condition. They provided evidence of recent maintenance, including an oil service and basic inspection, ensuring it needs nothing. Additionally, they clarified that the van has remained under warranty since its purchase, offering further reassurance to potential buyers. They also welcomed inquiries, ensuring transparency in the auction process and the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Inquiries from several prospective buyers indicate a mixture of interest and caution regarding the vehicle's features and previous issues. @Davethewave asked about the size of the bed, and @Wandering_Lens requested details on solar and tank capacities, showing their focus on practical usage. Other potential buyers, like @Speedy4, were particularly concerned about leaks and warranty details, indicating a desire for clarity before committing to a purchase. The seller promptly responded to these inquiries, confirming certain specifications and addressing concerns about previous leaks and winterization issues.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the van's condition, particularly regarding a potential bumper impact noted by @cbskiguy, who expressed worries about unseen damage and requested verification. The seller asserted that the van had never been in any accidents, but a minor clip pop was acknowledged. There were also questions about the warranty coverage for the upfit by @Speedy4, who doubted its validity after two years, but this was ultimately confirmed as still active. Additionally, the recurring mention of leaks, even though repaired, suggests lasting apprehension among bidders about the van's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed positive sentiments about the vintage van, highlighting its nostalgic appeal. @minidude described it as a 'super cool van' and a true 'time capsule' of the mid-70s, a sentiment echoed by @70_duster who emphasized its authenticity and memory-evoking design. @soler300 and @CarFoolLane both praised its funky, groovy vibe and the unique 70s decor, with the latter noting the impressive overall presentation of the interior. Others, like @robbiefarmer and @echoecho, appreciated the laid-back feel of the van, deeming it perfect for leisure activities, while @mrvans remembered similar vehicles from high school days, connecting it to fond memories.
Neutral: Several comments took a more factual or neutral tone, focusing on specific features and details about the van's condition. @CarFoolLane mentioned the lack of factory air conditioning, followed by insights from @2nytola (The Seller) clarifying that it has a functional aftermarket air conditioning system. @David_P pointed out the ashtrays, adding to the nostalgic theme, while also questioning the meaning of 'headrest' in the title, prompting @2nytola (The Seller) to explain its significance. @yellowc7vert was curious about the imperfections noted, and @2nytola (The Seller) addressed those concerns with transparency, providing reassurance about the overall state of the van.
Negative: A few comments reflected concerns about the vehicle, particularly regarding its functionalities and condition. @carlivar mentioned potential in-state smog hassles, indicating issues that might affect future buyers. Additionally, @Acorn19 criticized the van for lacking typical 70s embellishments, which might deter some enthusiasts interested in a more representative model of that era. There was also a note of caution from @natew51, suggesting that driving the van near schools could lead to unwanted attention, indicating some discomfort around its cultural implications, particularly for parents. Although the overall spectrum of comments was overwhelmingly positive, these critical perspectives were present.
|
|
|