Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: Overall, many commenters praised the vehicle, highlighting the exceptional craftsmanship and aesthetic appeal of Jeff Hayes' build. @azkid remarked on the stunning artistry and attention to detail, comparing it to distinguished works like those of Singer. Others, such as @mikefiftynine and @gmmuscleusa, commended the vehicle for its luxurious features and incredible interior, describing it as a masterpiece and noting the superb attention to detail often found in Hayes' restorations. The car not only stands out visually but is regarded as a work of rolling art, deserving admiration.
Neutral: A mix of inquiries and constructive comments reflected an interest in the car's build specifics and overall details. Commenters like @johnnyb11 and @lincolncad raised questions about technical aspects, such as the manual brake system and registration details. @restocreations expressed skepticism about why high-end builds like this often resurface in auctions with low mileage, while others chimed in to discuss the impact of choices like suspension type on performance. The discussion opened a channel for potential buyers to clarify their concerns and share insights about the vehicle's uniqueness.
Negative: Conversely, there was criticism directed towards both the vehicle and its seller. Some users felt that the seller's defensive responses to comments were unwarranted, with @asparkowlfan stating that such reactions reflect poorly on a professional seller. Detractors noted issues like the absence of independent rear suspension and manual brakes as points of contention. @mrogersii specifically questioned aspects of the build while suggesting that the seller's emphasis on aesthetics overshadowed performance concerns. This back-and-forth sparked debate among users, indicating polarized opinions on the car's design choices and market positioning.
 |
 |
Positive: @OvertonAutomotive is excited about the vehicle, expressing that it is exactly the car he wants in his garage. Enthusiasts like @SteveTheodore and @Pearsman share similar sentiments, with @Pearsman claiming this is the "peak 911" and highlighting the unmatched analog experience of the car. Many commenters are impressed with the vehicle's stunning build and design, with @Mcnellisrt praising the gorgeous gray and black color scheme. Others share their admiration for the car's driving performance, with @PTS-Dan calling it an exhilarating and precise driving machine.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle's price and market value reflect an optimistic trend, with @ArtVandelay2 stating that these cars are going up exponentially, encouraging potential buyers to act quickly. @Micro912 notes the rising demand for early 2000s analog cars, indicating that the value for low-mileage examples will likely rise accordingly. There is a general agreement among many users that the car commands a serious price tag, and it has the potential to sell for a significant amount at auction.
Negative: Some comments reveal concerns about the aftermarket modifications on the car, such as @biz72 questioning the cost to revert the seats back to stock and @Scott40 mentioning that the canards are definitely not OEM options for this vehicle. @RacerX1979 points out a differentiation in the market value between the RS 4.0 and this model, suggesting that the prices should reflect the differences closely. Additionally, @gmund jokingly mentions a ridiculously low price listing for the car, indicating skepticism about the authenticity of certain listings.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed overwhelming admiration for the 812 GTS, describing it with terms like "drop dead gorgeous" and praising its stunning appearance and color combination. @boaboyoz, who referred to it as an "incredible and inspired build," reflects the sentiment shared by @amirhtlusa and @GDogg who also find the car visually alluring. @orangefan44 noted its superb balance of taste and wow factor, underscoring its uniqueness among Ferraris. The seller, @Wob, emphasized that this specific version is part of the exclusive Tailor Made line, which has garnered excitement among potential bidders and enthusiasts alike.
Neutral: Commenters shared some neutral observations regarding logistical aspects of the auction process surrounding the 812 GTS. @jeffcap64 suggested that the window sticker release was eagerly anticipated, while @Read33 relayed frustrations about the website's navigation complications which some participants encountered. The discussions included various comments about the auction mechanics, such as scheduling inspections before bidding and the importance of ensuring funds are available to avoid non-paying bids, which @wob highlighted in response to bidder concerns.
Negative: There were concerns expressed regarding modifications on the vehicle, particularly the tunes and exhaust changes which some users, including @jerry10, noted could void the Ferrari warranty. Commenters like @QuarterHorses raised questions about whether these modifications would affect maintenance agreements and resale values—a common worry among high-end sports car buyers. Although many praised the car's aesthetics, some potential bidders appeared hesitant due to these issues, as seen in discussions about warranty implications in relation to tuning.
|
 |
Positive: @JHBBII praises the stunning appearance of the vehicle, particularly noting the Sea Wolf Gray color and exposed carbon fiber details, expressing appreciation for the meticulous build of the Z06/Z07. @Steve911GT3 also complements the car, highlighting the foggy backdrop that enhances its appearance, while @RailGun appreciates the color and black trim combination, showing general enthusiasm for the vehicle's aesthetics. Additionally, @Fuelieguy commends the seller for providing thorough information, indicating the presentation of the car has been exceptionally detailed, making a case for a positive auction outcome.
Neutral: The seller, @SMTMMF, is very proactive in addressing potential buyers' inquiries, providing detailed answers about the vehicle's care, specifications, and maintenance history, including information about tire conditions and modifications made for track compatibility. Regarding the vehicle's specifications, the seller confirms that both the factory detailed history and service records are available for review, which reassures buyers of the car's well-maintained status. The conversation about the condition of the alignment and brake fluids indicates that the seller is committed to ensuring that buyers are fully informed about the car's performance and any necessary maintenance that has been performed.
Negative: Some comments indicate concerns about specific aspects of the car. @ucla95 raises questions regarding the tire conditions and the alignment, hinting at potential discrepancies in performance based on previous experiences with alignment issues in similar models. There is also a note from @De3de8 about the additional cost associated with the vehicle's shiny primer, suggesting that some aspects of the vehicle's paintwork may be viewed critically. Furthermore, @ucla95's inquiry about creasing on the competition seats points to possible concerns regarding the interior's wear and tear, which may diminish buyer confidence.
|
27k-Mile 2004 Ford Mustang GT Convertible 40th Anniversary 5-Speed
1FAFP45X64F123488
Lot 235074
Dealer
 |
Positive: Commenters praised the Mustang for its collectible appeal, noting that there are only a limited number of the 2004 Anniversary convertibles produced. @Mustangretriever highlighted that owning one could potentially yield collectible value in the future, especially since their car has low mileage and serves as a great summer cruiser. Enthusiastic remarks about the car included admiration for its unique features such as the Cobra mirrors, which hold significant aftermarket value, as pointed out by @laffs. Furthermore, @gdspc expressed their love for the striking Crimson Red color of the vehicle, which added to its aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions about the condition and value of the Mustang. @Reconjr mentioned a recent sale price of another anniversary model to suggest that the car's current asking price might be a steal. @Gmc2013 shared insights from their extensive experience in buying and selling cars, pointing out certain imperfections and wear on the vehicle that could affect its overall value. @laffs agreed with @Gmc2013 on the condition being consistent with its mileage but noted that the car likely wasn't a 'pampered' example, indicating it may have been driven more than preserved carefully.
Negative: On the other hand, some critiques emerged regarding the car's condition, notably from @Gmc2013, who pointed out body and paint imperfections as well as rust issues. The comment reflected concern about the value in relation to these flaws. Additionally, @Mychordistooshort expressed skepticism about the no reserve auction strategy, suggesting that the seller might end up losing out financially by offering it without reserve. @zebra9 inquired about potential fluid leaks or any additional needs beyond replacing tires, which indicated a level of concern regarding the overall upkeep of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Commentators have expressed high regard for the vehicle, particularly praising the striking combination of black exterior with red interior. @mjmelo described the red interior as changing the car's desirability dramatically, labeling it a stunning combination. @bmchan commented on the car's coolness and expressed a willingness to reconsider their preference against black cars due to this particular vehicle. Enthusiasts like @trh77 highlighted the car's overall fantastic appearance, while @Magdaddy and @Lilptr lauded its high level of customization and optioning, showcasing the exquisite details like sport seats and red gauges that enhance its appeal. The vibrant red leather was especially mentioned as a standout feature that resonates with many potential buyers.
Neutral: There are practical notes and observations found within the comments, such as @matt.treiber expressing envy over certain features available in the 2003 model, like the glove box, which was not present in his older model. Additionally, @atlshaver shared their experience with a similar model, indicating that the vehicle has been appreciated for years and remains valuable. @Collectibleclassics noted the car’s timelessness, while @1600veloce, the seller, provided detailed insights about the listing process, their services, and logistics, aiming to reassure potential buyers about the car's readiness and the auction environment. Questions were also raised by @axoo regarding minor damage identified in the car's Carfax report, which the seller addressed succinctly.
Negative: Criticism arises in the form of caution regarding the car's condition and history, as expressed by some commenters. @axoo particularly sought clarification on minor damage mentioned in the Carfax report, indicating potential concerns regarding the vehicle's past. While no strong negative comments were articulated, the mention of damage implies some skepticism among prospective buyers who are discerning about their purchases. Overall, while the feedback is mostly positive, there remains a tinge of caution expected with such high-value automobiles.
|
 |
Positive: @shillman praised Sonoran Rovers for delivering trucks of impeccable quality, expressing confidence that the winner of the auction will enjoy it. @STAN1750 shared a positive personal experience with a similar BMW-powered Defender, noting its reliable engine and smooth driving capabilities. Multiple commentators referred to the uniqueness and desirability of the BMW 2.8 M52 powered Defender, highlighting its better performance compared to older NAS Defenders. @SONORANROVERS showcased their dedication to transparency by providing detailed service records and engaging with bidders by answering their questions promptly.
Neutral: @simonaustin remarked on the unique nature of BMW-powered Defenders, indicating a general interest in the auction. @Jon_H shared personal experiences with right-hand drive vehicles, indicating that he adjusted quickly to them, which is relevant for potential bidders considering the driving configuration of the Defender. Comments about the vehicle's paint color variability, particularly from @ShipleysDog and @motorcarstudio, added a level of curiosity about its appearance, with @SONORANROVERS providing clarifications about its color representation in photos.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle's features; @777AIA humorously noted that auction descriptions often remind bidders about the right-hand drive aspect, implying that it could be a potential issue for unprepared buyers. @casualcollector inquired about the vehicle's drivetrain maintenance history, suggesting skepticism regarding its condition with over 214K miles. Additionally, @2hecknback pointed out discrepancies about the spare wheel type, hinting towards a potential miscommunication about vehicle specifications.
|
 |
Positive: @iwantalexus praised the vehicle's condition by commenting on how nice the LS looks. @kjvb7202 (The Seller) expressed optimism and dedication, noting that they are hoping to find a good home for their family's car. They emphasized that the car was well cared for, indicating a level of confidence in its quality and history.
Neutral: @medium raised some questions about the condition of the trunk floor and asked for specifics on the repairs to the rear quarter, showing a cautious but interested approach. They also inquired about whether the air struts were replaced with original equipment manufacturer (OEM) parts or aftermarket, which @kjvb7202 (The Seller) acknowledged and agreed to provide further details on. @McFood correctly identified that the window tint is aftermarket, which provided additional clarification for prospective buyers.
Negative: Concerns around potential repairs were voiced by @medium, addressing the need to confirm the quality of the repairs made to the vehicle. The mention of aftermarket parts during repairs, including air struts, may raise questions for some bidders regarding long-term reliability and authenticity. Overall, while there are genuine inquiries into the car's condition, the focus on the repairs suggests some apprehension from potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @flydelta-747 (The Seller) expresses pride in the 1995 OBS model, highlighting its exceptional qualities and positive feedback from onlookers over the years. The seller notes frequent compliments received from strangers at various locations, suggesting that the truck's well-preserved condition plays a significant role in the admiration it garners. They emphasize that owning this truck brings joy and recognition, making it a highly appealing choice for enthusiasts.
Neutral: The comments do not delve into technical specifications or detailed performance aspects about the 1995 OBS truck, focusing instead on the general appreciation and aesthetic value of the model. @flydelta-747 (The Seller) encourages potential buyers to reach out with any inquiries, indicating a willingness to engage with interested individuals but does not provide explicit information about features or functionalities of the vehicle. This may reflect the seller's intention to centralize the conversation around the visual appeal and community feedback rather than technical details.
Negative: There are no negative comments presented in the excerpts provided. The review solely consists of positive observations and neutral invitations for further communication. Even though the seller acknowledges the frequent praises received, there is no mention of any shortcomings or criticisms regarding the truck or its condition.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle appears to be in excellent condition, as noted by @P48ker (The Seller) who has known the car for several years and describes it as having been a third or fourth car that was dry stored during winter and only used on sunny days. @mikeor praises the vehicle for being a well-sorted example, encouraging potential buyers to enjoy it, while also commending the thoroughness of @P48ker's detailed photos. Furthermore, @Jimbolong calls it a 'very nice car', indicating overall satisfaction with its appearance and condition.
Neutral: @P48ker (The Seller) reassures potential buyers about the car's solid condition, mentioning that the floor is in great shape for a 50-year-old vehicle and that there is no known rust beyond what is visible in the trunk and engine bay. There were requests for additional floor pan photos, to which @P48ker responded that he would try to provide more detailed images over the weekend. Additionally, @DAllen123 asks for clarification regarding a white box near the battery, leading to a discussion about the components of the vehicle, showcasing the interest and engagement from the community.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the potential rust and mechanical components of the vehicle. @jaxhdsoftail inquires directly about the presence of rust, and there are specific questions about parts like the mysterious white box near the battery, which @P48ker (The Seller) attempts to address but initially lacked information about its exact function. The engagement indicates a level of caution from potential buyers, seeking assurance on the vehicle's condition as the auction comes to a close.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters were enthusiastic about the Ford F-150 Raptor, praising its capabilities and aesthetics. @Carbine123 called it an 'Amazing Truck' and commended the seller, while @Atom0096 noted its 'great looking low mileage' features. @ViperNC mentioned their satisfaction with a similar Raptor, emphasizing the rarity of the Avalanche color and the truck's appeal. Additionally, @McDeeb (The Seller) highlighted the Raptor's unique specifications, such as the absence of a moonroof and its expertly spec'd features, claiming it as 'visually stunning' and a superior off-road vehicle. Commenters like @MidwestMonster expressed their appreciation for this generation of Raptors, particularly pointing out the advantages of not having the problematic sunroof.
Neutral: Several comments focused on specific details about the vehicle's maintenance history and any minor damage incidents. @AZFLG asked for clarification on minor damages, which @McDeeb (The Seller) addressed by describing small cosmetic issues that had been promptly fixed. @bryant619 inquired about the status of the cam phasers, leading to a detailed response from the seller about maintenance records and preventive measures taken. Some users sought insights into minor repair matters, agreeing with the seller's perspective on the truck's overall condition and upkeep. @JLEE82 raised questions regarding the source of previous mechanical issues, which the seller clarified, ensuring transparency about the vehicle's past.
Negative: Concerns were raised by a few commenters regarding the vehicle's maintenance and cosmetic damage history. @joshua12345678910 pointed out warning lights that appeared in a photo of the dash, questioning if it indicated underlying issues. @mhagger and @abraham discussed potential problems related to the cam phaser issues commonly associated with this model, expressing skepticism about the effectiveness of previous maintenance updates. @Critic questioned the rationale behind offering two sets of spare wheels and tires, hinting at the possibility of the owner anticipating off-road difficulties. Overall, while most comments were in favor of the Raptor, these discussions reflected a cautious skepticism from some users about the truck's reliability and history.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments express a positive sentiment towards the 2018 Land Rover Range Rover, praising its overall condition and transparency regarding its service history. @BBK, who owns multiple Range Rovers, applauds the seller's diplomatic responses and emphasizes the vehicle's dependability and capability, despite concerns over the replacement engine. @Rocketman63 remarks on the vehicle's beautiful condition, noticing it looks brand new, and appreciates the informative videos shared by the seller. @LayNout also finds the new engine installation by a dealership as attractive, citing it as a win for future owners.
Neutral: Neutral comments mostly focus on inquiries about the vehicle's maintenance history and specific replacement parts. @cjw24 asks about documentation regarding the replacement engine, while @Antonelli and others seek clarity on the warranty attached to the new engine and parts. There is also discussion around multiple repairs that the vehicle has undergone, including the engine replacement, which raises questions about past issues. @TopCityBMW requests details about the failed safety inspection, showing concern but not expressing overt negativity. The seller, @jpreston123, responds transparently to these inquiries, providing details and documentation as needed.
Negative: While there are several concerns raised, notably from @Wildboar, who points out that a $120,000 vehicle already requiring a replacement motor and multiple repairs is disconcerting, indicating the car has seen significant wear. @BMWE90Guy expresses skepticism about owning a Land Rover outside of warranty, hinting at reliability concerns. Specific comments focus on the warranty status of the replacement engine and the recent damage reports referenced in the Carfax. @Moreover, a clear reaction is seen after @jpreston123 acknowledged the warranty misinformation regarding the engine replacement, inciting distrust in the vehicle’s value and reliability moving forward.
|
Supercharged LS7-Powered 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche LTZ Black Diamond Sport Edition by SLP
3GNTKGE72DG238303
Lot 235082
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Gmmuscleusa praised the vehicle, expressing excitement about the LS7 engine with a supercharger in the pearl white Avalanche, describing it as a dream build. @Sandman4x4 echoed this sentiment, highlighting the impressive combination of the aluminum 7.0 engine and supercharger, saying it's a "dream on steroids!" The overall enthusiasm for the truck is evident, with @kirkjewell complementing it and asking about features like backup cameras, and @seanfrontz expressing eagerness to experience a ride in it before its sale, emphasizing the thrill of a 7-liter engine.
Neutral: Several commenters are requesting additional information about the vehicle's modifications and specifications. @Clwilson12 and @MichiganRR inquired about engine details, specifically the part numbers and whether the heads had been addressed in the replacement process. @IH82BL8 (The Seller) responded by assuring them he would get the requested information from the service department, including confirmation that the truck would not pass California smog tests due to its modifications, but that it carried a factory-backed warranty and had factory cats.
Negative: Despite the excitement, there are questions and concerns about the vehicle's ability to handle the high power and modifications. @johnny0620 raised concerns about how the 700HP might affect various mechanical components like the transfer case and u-joints. @srech77 questioned whether the transmission and other performance parts had been upgraded to handle the extra power, expressing concern given the previous engine failure due to a lifter issue. @IH82BL8 (The Seller) informed them that no significant modifications had been made to the components beyond the engine itself, suggesting that the stock parts might not be sufficient for this level of power.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its unique specifications and potential for performance. @dawg and @PCHhwy1 enthusiastically noted that the Carrara white on black manual coupe, especially with the sunroof delete, is an ideal choice for track enthusiasts. @Ivs77, the seller, shared their passion for the car and confirmed it has been well-maintained in controlled conditions. They detailed extensive upkeep under reputable Porsche facilities, which was well-received by those considering the purchase. @StealsWheels agreed, sharing their positive experience owning a similar model, emphasizing that this vehicle represents a bridge between analog driving pleasures and modern usability, making it a compelling collector's item.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on various technical aspects of the vehicle. @bunger78 and @York asked specific questions regarding performance metrics like compression and the condition of coolant hoses, raising valid concerns during the evaluation of such an older vehicle. @Ivs77 promptly addressed these inquiries, confirming that the compression test was done dry and providing conscientious updates about maintenance undertaken during ownership, which lends credibility to the car's quality. The seller was transparent about the condition of the soft-touch surfaces and provided detailed information about tire dates, indicating a commitment to thorough communication.
Negative: On the flip side, some commenters expressed concerns about potential downsides of the car, particularly regarding the soft-touch surfaces and age-related issues. @Al_Cantara wondered about the stickiness of the interior components, while @York pointed out that aging rubber components, like coolant hoses, might pose a risk over time. Although @Ivs77 provided information about the maintenance history, @WDcordes was critical of the short driving video and asked for more comprehensive footage to better verify the car's performance. Finally, @HDWalt cautioned about the pricing stability, suggesting that the vehicle might not see strong resale value, hinting at hesitancy among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's looks and condition. @blustrk09 called it a 'great looking machine', while @Carzz described it as 'a beautiful truck' that should fetch a high price. @baloniehead73 emphasized its cleanliness, praising the truck as 'bout as clean as it gets'. Additionally, @CDehne noted the choice of wheels and tires as 'perfection' and @RamFan84 highlighted the appealing two-tone color combination, indicating strong demand for this specific setup.
Neutral: Several users inquired about various details regarding the truck, including specifics about its mechanical components and features. @Jayzee1 requested pictures of the truck prior to painting and went on to discuss tire sizing to help @BadAzp, who had questions about the rims and dimensions. The seller, @NaplesLuxuryCars, addressed concerns about paint originality and the condition of various parts, promising additional photos and video updates. There were also queries about past repairs such as the oil pan gasket and interior trim condition, indicating a desire for thorough transparency about the vehicle’s history.
Negative: Some comments hinted at concerns regarding the truck's specifications and potential modifications. @BadAzp expressed uncertainty about the truck's 4x4 capabilities, wondering if it might be excessive for their needs. Similarly, @Markjr raised questions about the originality of the gear ratios, suggesting previous modifications. Other users requested clarification on potential issues, such as trim cracks and the status of various components, highlighting a cautious approach among some potential buyers regarding the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 described the car as a "Beautiful California S430👌", while @Gs82 felt the vehicle was "Worth double that". @Dalba4 also complimented the S-class, calling it a "wonderful example of inexpensive luxury" and expressed that whoever purchases it is fortunate. @toolmantaylor appreciated the seller's promptness regarding DMV responsibilities, noting it's a significant advantage not having to deal with it. @4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) assured @toolmantaylor about the clean underside and no present leaks, which adds to the positive impression of the car's condition.
Neutral: @4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) provided information about the vehicle's front air struts being replaced when @kenhurder inquired about the original parts. In response to @nonametotell's questions about rear struts and acquisition, the seller confirmed that the rear struts are fine and the car was acquired from a new car store. The seller also clarified title status for @protostark, stating that the title is free and clear, which is important for potential buyers considering financing or resale.
Negative: @Jonfrancis raised a concern regarding the left door locks, stating they work intermittently and asking if that's a significant issue for long trips. @nonametotell also inquired about rear strut condition, hinting at maintenance uncertainties. In contrast, @jas212 expressed surprise at the lack of heated or vented seats, suggesting something might be missing for an S-class vehicle, while @acd683 noted that such features were not standard and required specific options, implying that the vehicle may have limitations typically expected in such luxury cars.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressing their admiration for the vehicle's condition, with @Ptrem noting its beautiful color, reminiscent of a Supra MKIV TT. @matthews_727 commented on how 'insanely mint for the miles' the car appears, and @MrMearns highlighted the vehicle's great shape while reassuring potential buyers about the catalytic converter costs. Additionally, @4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) provided thorough information and updates on requests, including paint meter readings and engagement proof for the 4WD, showcasing transparency and engagement with buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about the car's history and maintenance details. @M3rryChristmas questioned the extent of the damage reported during the seller's ownership. @MrMearns raised concerns about the vehicle's emissions and potential issues that may arise post-sale, further leading to discussions about warranty types for California buyers. @4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) consistently responded with relevant details, indicating that the paint was original and addressing other specifications that buyers were interested in, such as the condition of the transmission and whether it has passed emissions tests.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's previous damage reports and the credibility of the seller. @ScottyC asked for details about the 'damage to front' labeled on CarFax, while @justinsea sought clarity on whether the vehicle had been in any accidents and the implications of such incidents on performance. There were also queries about potential issues with various car features, such as the rust condition on the frame from @dart340, and operational aspects like windows and AC, reflecting a sense of caution among prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @K51020Ranch mentions that it's a nice truck and suggests needing another K20 on the ranch because they are reliable workhorses. @dawgeq87 agrees it's a nice looking beast and appreciates the truck's appearance, expressing interest by adding it to their watchlist. @KirkTr finds it beautiful and requests a driving video to see how it performs in motion.
Neutral: @K51020Ranch asks the seller, @Jenjoyrobertson, for a cold start video and a driving video to assist potential bidders in the auction. @jjmorris states the truck has been local since new, confirming the mileage as accurate. Meanwhile, @53COE inquires about the truck's history, speculating on its original use as a fire district vehicle and whether it was always garaged.
Negative: @Manual_Only humorously remarks about the condition of the seat, implying it might have been damaged or unpleasant. @JKNAK questions the function of a switch near the heater controls, indicating some uncertainty about the vehicle's features. Overall, the comments suggest a mixture of enthusiasm for its aesthetic value and some critical thoughts about usability features.
|
 |
Positive: @RBF69 praised their recent experience, describing Collectible Classics as an awesome company after purchasing a car from them. @Collectibleclassics expressed gratitude for the feedback and mentioned their commitment to customer satisfaction, highlighting a personal connection with the customer by thanking them for enjoying their new F-TYPE. This rapport is indicative of the dealership's efforts to create a positive buying experience, aiming to uphold their reputation through good service and quality vehicles.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics addressed @Snowhill's inquiries directly, confirming that the soft top is in great shape with no leaks or damage, and the wheels have no curb rashes. They also mention that some interior buttons are slightly tacky, however, the overall condition of the vehicle is well-maintained. They provided information regarding the key fobs, tire details, and service records, striving to be transparent while managing customer expectations regarding available information.
Negative: @DFT2212 critiqued Collectible Classics for their initial response, suggesting that while they emphasized their company’s excellence, they failed to directly answer @Snowhill's specific questions. Additionally, @ChicagoGuy pointed out a discrepancy regarding the manufacturer date and model year, leading to a clarifying comment from @59gene explaining the norms of vehicle production dates. This interaction highlights potential concerns regarding accurate representation and customer communication.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle often highlight its aesthetic appeal and features. @BigZach1986 described the car as 'gorgeous', while @BMWE90Guy expressed admiration for its design, noting it looks significantly better than its pre-refresh model. Additionally, @EJM shared a positive personal experience with their own BMW 750li Sport, praising its reliability and handling over many miles.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around inquiries regarding the vehicle's features and history. @daviduccio asked about the Comfort Access feature and the state of the door locking mechanism, to which @CAGNASH (The Seller) clarified that the car does not have this feature and confirmed that it comes with one key. Other commenters sought information about engine specifications and potential maintenance issues, demonstrating an interest in the vehicle's performance and care history without showing strong bias either way.
Negative: There were some concerns raised regarding potential issues with the vehicle. @daviduccio highlighted his past experience with door handles, indicating they could be problematic after years of use, while @Coonan357 inquired about oil leaks and the status of the alternator bracket seal. These questions suggest that some bidders are wary of the vehicle's long-term reliability, reflecting a need for cautious consideration before making a purchase.
|
4,700-Mile 2010 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Super Snake Coupe
1ZVBP8JS2A5168484
Lot 235092
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, with @mikeyklikesit describing it as a "Nice Ride!" and @TommyGuns exclaiming, "WOW, an all around awesome car!" The car is recognized for its powerful engine, with @TommyGuns bringing attention to the impressive 725-850 horsepower range of the 2010 Shelby GT500 Super Snake. Additionally, @corkscrewlife praised it as one of the last Shelby Mustangs before Carroll Shelby's passing, emphasizing its heritage and beauty, wishing the seller good luck with the sale.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding the vehicle's history and specifications. @yomamma asked about the number of previous owners, while @mrrichter1969 and @jpracing281 sought information on the engine's horsepower and modifications. The seller, @TuffponySC, responded to these queries, confirming there have only been two owners and noting that the engine has been professionally tuned to 750 horsepower with various upgrades. Other commentators, like @BobbyDye and @TheRealGeno, requested additional photos and documents about the car's condition and history, indicating a reasonable interest in verifying the vehicle's quality.
Negative: A few concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition. @jwehr specifically requested detailed photos of imperfections, including a scuff on the front bumper and potential scrapes, and sought assurance about any other possible damage. @SandyEngelberg noted an issue with severe play in the tie rods, asking if it had been corrected. The seller, @TuffponySC, clarified that he's had no issues since owning the car and assured that prior concerns had been addressed by the meticulous previous owner, though he expressed some frustrations about the driveway conditions contributing to wear.
|
 |
Positive: @Keallen76 (The Seller) demonstrates a strong commitment to maintaining the vehicle's performance and reliability. He highlights that the entire coolant system has been replaced along with a new water pump, radiator, and thermostat. @Keallen76 (The Seller) emphasizes his passion for Land Rovers and how he takes care to sort out any issues with the vehicles he sells, ensuring they are serviced properly before reaching potential buyers. He assures that the vehicle drives beautifully and expresses confidence in its roadworthiness for long journeys.
Neutral: Questions from potential buyers such as @BostonCarGuy and @kasperville reflect some standard inquiries regarding maintenance receipts and any structural concerns, including light frame rust. @Keallen76 (The Seller) reassures that he has receipts for previous work, indicating that the service history is well-documented. He mitigates concerns regarding rust by clarifying that it is only surface-level and not significant, and he is willing to provide additional photographic evidence to support his claims.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects, there are lingering concerns from buyers. @kasperville raises issues about potential rust and whether the vehicle was included in a gas tank recall. Furthermore, @neserurah questions the status of the stop/start system, specifically regarding the auxiliary battery, which @Keallen76 (The Seller) acknowledges is dead and he opted not to replace it. While there seem to be no active faults reported, the potential presence of issues related to the stop/start system may deter some buyers from proceeding.
|
 |
Positive: Overall, the vehicle is being positively received by several commenters, especially regarding its low mileage and well-optioned features. @JpRocketship highlights the benefits of owning a low mileage manual with sport seats, encouraging potential buyers to budget for minor repairs rather than deter them. @Capcitymotors (The Seller) assures bidders that the car runs well and has been lightly used, with smooth brake performance and a properly functioning rear spoiler. Additionally, @Craig66 notes the importance of appreciating the 20-year-old vehicle's condition in relation to its initial value.
Neutral: Several commenters focus on specific features and concerns regarding the car, indicating interest but also caution. @Spokayman raises valid points about potential repair costs for issues like the foam blowing from the HVAC system and the overall condition of the brakes. They express a preference for further information about brake pad thickness and rotor scoring, underlining the importance of transparency. @Thomas54 and @browndog, meanwhile, call attention to issues such as needing an Over-Rev Report and understanding whether the engine has an IMS bearing, which adds to the vehicle's maintenance history discussions.
Negative: Concerns surrounding the vehicle's potential maintenance issues and age surface in the comments. @Spokayman emphasizes the various repair needs due to the car's age, including an expensive headliner replacement and costly brake rotor repairs. @Dubbed743 questions the consistency of the car's condition with its mileage, while @sixty6chevy expresses anxiety about the potential scents inside the car, illustrating a broader apprehension about buying used vehicles. @Craig66 also critiques @browndog for seeming overly fixated on issues related to IMS and bore scores, suggesting a negative atmosphere among specific commenters.
|
Modified 2001 Ford Excursion Limited 7.3L Power Stroke 4×4
1FMSU43F21ED82133
Lot 235095
Private Party
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described as a solid truck in pristine condition with zero rust or body damage, which has been a significant selling point for @matthill (The Seller). He originally purchased it for his wife to use as a family vehicle, indicative of its spaciousness and practicality. @matthill assures that the truck is too nice to simply remain parked in a garage, underscoring its value and potential utility for a new owner.
Neutral: Several comments indicate curiosity about the vehicle's history and specifications. @CoastlineJesse questions the reasons behind the truck's multiple ownerships, suggesting there may be underlying issues. @haugekaleb is interested in understanding its height for garage compatibility, while @JLack9090 inquires about its ability to accommodate larger tires, showing that potential buyers are actively considering how it meets their individual needs.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's previous sales and whether the roof basket, included in a prior sale, is part of this transaction. @rootedrefugee pointedly asked about this, which may imply disappointment to potential buyers looking for complete accessories. Additionally, @matthill's comments about his wife's preference for her Expedition hint at some underlying discontent, suggesting that the vehicle may not entirely meet familial expectations despite its high quality.
|
 |
Positive: The comments praise the 2013 Porsche 911 Carrera S Cabriolet for its excellent condition and impressive specifications. @michaelmotorcar highlighted that this car has 34 Porsche dealer service records, making it a standout choice amongst its competitors. Commenters have also appreciated the vehicle's manual transmission, with @vivek.ze stating that the interior looks significantly better with a stick shift, and @boaboyoz calling it a 'sinister sexy specimen.' Overall, the vehicle is described as well-presented and is noted for possessing all the right options and features.
Neutral: Several users raised inquiries about the photos provided, with @jgriffi1 questioning the low-light quality of the images and @RegaJohn suggesting better angles for critical details like door cards and the cabriolet top. @ziodesign echoed concerns about the necessity for detailed photographs, particularly regarding the DME report and maintenance history. The discussions around the fatigue in photography indicate a shared sentiment that clearer pictures would enhance the selling process, positively impacting bidders' confidence.
Negative: On the downside, some users pointed out issues with the car's history, specifically the multiple emission failures it encountered while in Georgia, which @michaelalex3 brought up. @m5mg expressed concern about the need for a DME over-rev report due to the manual transmission, indicating that potential buyers may need more reassurance regarding the vehicle's engine health. Additionally, @michaelmotorcar communicated uncertainty about the specifics of past service records and repairs, particularly regarding the oil pan, which could raise red flags for some bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @APLANTEDLEIF praises the vehicle as a great start for anyone looking to get into an Oval Window Beetle, noting its solid foundation and the presence of original components like the engine and trans-axle. @gwhitcomb appreciates the unique color choice, suggesting it might not appeal to purists but has its own charm. @Datsun911 emphasizes the car's aesthetic appeal, arguing that personalization by owners is more important than maintaining original stock conditions, which adds character to the vehicle and makes it more meaningful.
Neutral: Several comments are mixed about the vehicle's restoration and modifications. @ttbrinson points out a color mismatch with the original production, while @Slam105 expresses that the repainted red does not enhance the Beetle's value and suggests a more subtle color could be better. @Sigohigo (The Seller) clarifies that the car is an original rag top, and discusses the performance modifications that could improve its value without straying from the car's purpose it serves for fun drives to football games.
Negative: Some comments highlight a concern over the vehicle's restoration choices. @another_70s_kid questions if anyone would mistake the color for original, hinting at the vehicle's deviation from authenticity. @stephen844 notes that turning it into a Restomod could dilute its value, cautioning that prospective buyers should decide between fully stock or heavily modified versions. @10isace brings attention to potential issues with the pans, asking for clarity on rust or discoloration which might affect the vehicle's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments reflect enthusiasm for the vehicle, with @Jadeum expressing that it's a dream car for them and feasible to restore. @NCBrokerJeff shares a positive personal experience, mentioning that he and his son found their own vintage Z car to be an enjoyable project. Commenter @01996tt notes that the body condition is impressive, praising it as an '8 out of 10' and indicating that someone will easily make this project a success.
Neutral: The seller, @micmccw, engages actively with potential bidders, providing crucial details about the car, such as its current driving condition and the need for some repairs. The listing is referred to as a 'project' due to overheating and some cosmetic defects, which @micmccw elaborates on while encouraging bidders. Commenters like @2002WS6 seek clarification about the vehicle's status, showing curiosity about issues such as potential leaks and overall performance.
Negative: Concerns surface about the car's condition, as @2002WS6 points out issues like overheating and a possible coolant leak. @Retrowonder notes the absence of the radiator shroud, which can exacerbate the overheating problem. Furthermore, @NismoFairladyZ shares disappointment, stating that their recent experiences with the Z32 did not receive much admiration, indicating that this particular model may not be as highly revered as other classic cars.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 described the CLS550 as beautiful, while @Jonesy66 reminisced about the CLS500's introduction on Top Gear, praising the car for its innovative design and expressing a good wish for the sale with a thumbs-up. @BrianBIN shared fond memories of owning a similar model and appreciated the updates and features of the 2012 version, calling it one of his favorite cars.
Neutral: @HighStandards_AMG asked several detailed questions regarding the car’s keys, air suspension, oil buildup, and brake pad readings, to which @DEAUTOSINC (The Seller) provided comprehensive answers, reaffirming the vehicle's excellent condition. @Boulderman inquired about the possibility of receiving a second key and its costs, while @vanye777 raised questions about California registration fees, receiving clear responses from the seller.
Negative: @KSP0938 expressed concern about potential unpleasant odors, specifically asking if the vehicle had been smoked in, prompting @DEAUTOSINC (The Seller) to assure that there are no weird smells. @HighStandards_AMG requested additional photos for verification of the car’s condition, emphasizing the importance of transparency, which hints at skepticism regarding the seller's claims of the car being in "pristine" condition. @Edwardfschulz pointed out a discrepancy in the car's color reported by Carfax and requested clarification on its authenticity, revealing a potential concern about the vehicle's presentation.
|
 |
Positive: @Atom0096 praised the vehicle, calling it a beautiful 55 Nomad with a super cool VIN number. @Serj also expressed excitement over this Nomad being in original condition, reminiscing about his father's Easter egg yellow Nomad. @Gm8351 complimented the car's design, asking about the originality of the interior, while @Dean55 shared fond memories of owning a similar model and wished luck to the seller. Many comments highlighted the car's stunning appearance, with @Tuberider calling it wonderful and @wantagh noting its beauty and family legacy. @hairyolds resonated with the emotional attachment to the vehicle, while @Ward62 expressed interest in adding it to his collection.
Neutral: Comments included inquiries about the car's history and specifics. @UPSROD asked about the story behind the VIN. Various users questioned the condition and any potential bodywork done on the vehicle, with @billthx138 pointing out that the rear passenger floor may have been replaced and @parrishdsp asking about missing rocker moldings. The seller, @DET1957, addressed these concerns, clarifying that the vehicle has been stored indoors since 1961 and has been well maintained, with no rust. Additionally, he provided background information on the car's use in family events and discussed details about the interior and exterior.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the condition of the vehicle. @parrishdsp questioned the absence of rocker moldings and suspected prior bodywork, suggesting possible signs of repair. @Notnew34 and @CorvLoverAlways pointed out evidence of possible floor panel replacements and modifications that could impact its originality. @parrishdsp and @Dean55 speculated on the car's history and condition, with @parrishdsp expressing skepticism about earlier repairs. Overall, while many praised the Nomad, there were several inquiries and comments of caution regarding its restoration and modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @RCPDesigns calls the vehicle a great looking survivor, expressing good wishes to the seller. @DoctorC. also shares a positive sentiment, simply stating that they like the vehicle. In addition, @cwinder1975 (The Seller) describes the car as a 'rare gem' and emphasizes its originality with no wood rot, contributing to the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and historical value.
Neutral: @Davey_Jones expresses support for @cwinder1975's decision to keep the car as a survivor instead of turning it into a hot rod. He mentions the rarity of Chevrolets from that era due to wood frame issues and highlights the smoothness of its overhead valve six-cylinder engine compared to the Ford Model A's engine. His comments appear to recognize the historical significance of the vehicle while also noting the competition between Chevrolet and Ford in the market.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle in the provided feedback. All comments reflect a sense of appreciation and recognition of the car's uniqueness and significance.
|
 |
Positive: @Kenny360 (The Seller) presents the 1998 Mercedes-Benz A160 Avantgarde as a solid, hard-to-find example of Mercedes' early A-Class, particularly highlighting its left-hand-drive configuration. The seller notes that the car maintains a clean body, a rare find among surviving W168 models, especially those in good quality. The Avantgarde trim adds a premium feel with upgraded interior materials and necessary features like factory air conditioning, enhancing the car's usability. Recent maintenance, including coolant flush and oil change, indicates care and diligence toward the vehicle, while the car's unique compact design and quirky character are described as head-turning and appreciated by onlookers at public events.
Neutral: Comments regarding the car's history and development context by @Dollycat3 shed light on its connection to the Smart Fortwo and how both models were products of Daimler's urban mobility vision in the late 1990s. @Kenny360 (The Seller) acknowledges the breakdown and history of these models, reinforcing the shared design philosophy that prioritizes compactness and safety. Observations on parts availability are mixed, with @Kenny360 addressing concerns about sourcing European parts in the U.S. while noting that several components are accessible through online platforms, aiding in the maintenance of the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns arise from @Miss_Mercedes, who warns of visible rust on the vehicle, indicating it was a factor in her decision to back out of purchasing. Specifically, there are mentions of rust on the lower edge of the driver's door and other areas not initially disclosed. @StuttgartTasmania provides a first-hand account confirming some surface-level rust but also notes areas of concern like a malfunctioning horn and a radio code issue. Additionally, @Dollycat3 suggests the car may not provide the same service experience as more commonly available vehicles, hinting at potential downsides of ownership.
|
 |
Positive: @Srev22, the seller, expresses great satisfaction with owning the car for over a year and mentions its appealing appearance. @bavarian_beaver praises the unique specifications of the vehicle, highlighting its desirability. @socialpro1 comments on the car's impressive performance and aesthetics, declaring it a beautiful choice. Others, like @DMellon, share their excitement about the car's specifications, indicating that it stands out and draws attention from admirers.
Neutral: Discussion about the vehicle includes inquiries from potential buyers like @Abdelray, who asks about the ride height, and @Bcpanis, who raises a question regarding an open recall noted on the Carfax. @wcarhart offers a trade suggestion but provides no details about the nature of the trade. @RoyallW mentions having seen the car in action, reinforcing that it has a striking presence on the road.
Negative: Some concerns surface regarding the vehicle's open recall for the alternator, with @Bcpanis seeking clarification on the issue. @Srev22 acknowledges the recall situation but reassures that there are no performance problems experienced with the car, suggesting that despite the wait time for repairs, the vehicle is in great operating condition. Overall, while there are logistical concerns, there are no significant negative comments regarding the car's performance or reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed high praise for the vehicle, noting its rarity and distinctive design. @Speedraser highlighted the uniqueness of the V12 Vantage S model, pointing out that only around 1640 were built, making it a truly special car. @gtjoey1314 shared excitement over the car's mechanics, underscoring its performance and driving experience, which many believe is unparalleled in its category. Overall, the car is seen as a blend of driving exuberance, high craftsmanship, and desirability in the luxury automobile market.
Neutral: Some comments focused on operational details that potential buyers should be aware of. @alvarouribe1988 (The Seller) addressed the standard document fee, stating that it would be waived for the sale, which @bringatrailer confirmed had been updated in the listing. There were also inquiries about the vehicle's history, with @SpareChange and @NA1Driver raising valid questions about its past ownership and any possible connections to Aston Martin's corporate activities, while acknowledging the car's significant stature in the performance category.
Negative: On the other hand, the vehicle's listing faced scrutiny regarding its description and condition. @Speedraser pointed out inaccuracies in the car's specifications, asserting that certain features were mistakenly categorized. Additionally, concerns about the clear coat’s condition were raised, with @Mrsobczyk noting that there was no visible peeling, though some discoloration was present on the PPF. Overall, while the car is celebrated, there are critical observations about its presentation and the importance of transparency in its history.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, particularly praising the high-performance engine. @jarllewis highlighted the impressive 427 LS engine, noting its 625hp Blueprint version and its excellent performance with great cooling. Similarly, @GPhillips called the LS427 with a 5-speed manual a fantastic combination for a classic 70s Chevelle, reminiscing about his own LS3-equipped Chevelle. The seller, @BlueChipServices, also engaged directly with the community, sharing updates and addressing questions, reassuring commenters about the car's quality and recent restorations.
Neutral: Several comments sought additional details regarding the car's specifications and condition. @reupdegrove and @vandyke20 inquired about the sheet metal condition and rust issues, with the seller responding that there are no current rust concerns, only some bubbling paint. Additionally, @carchasers questioned whether the cowl hood flapper still functioned with the LS swap, and @BBCChris wanted specifics on the type of transmission used. The seller continued to provide information and committed to uploading dyno sheets after the auction.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding aspects of the vehicle that potential buyers frowned upon. @Kumiteken showed dissatisfaction with the decision to replace the 502 engine, questioning the necessity of that move. @ssterry expressed a personal dislike for the dashboard style, although others suggested modifications that could enhance its appearance. Overall, some bidders were cautious, particularly regarding the car's history and condition, revealing a mix of skepticism among the enthusiasm for the car's performance.
|
 |
Positive: @jturner describes the vehicle as beautiful and comments positively on the overall appearance, noting that the interior works well. @WIS89 expresses enthusiasm about the car, joking about wanting it in their garage and reflecting on the short distance of the drive, indicating a strong desire for the vehicle. The general sentiment among some comments suggests an appreciation for the car's unique characteristics and its cool factor, enhancing its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: @rwatkins2017 (The Seller) clarifies that the vehicle is an automatic and the rear wheel wells have not been re-arched, providing useful information about the car's features. @mlvattorney points out that the rear wheel wells appear different compared to typical models, sharing observations from restoration photos that highlight some inconsistencies. @BCampagna1 raises a question about the convertible top not being installed, speculating whether it may not fit due to modifications, which reflects curiosity about the car's build.
Negative: Several comments raise concerns about modifications to the car. @Leverone and @wannabid55 specifically mention that the rear wheel wells are not in stock configuration and appear to be larger than normal, suggesting that these changes may have been poorly executed. @Knighthawk79 questions the owner's awareness of the sale, hinting at potential issues with the sale process. Additionally, @BIGDOG70 asks about the engine specs, indicating a desire for more technical information, which could imply that the current marketing lacks sufficient detail about the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @70_duster praises the vehicle's two-tone color scheme, calling it great. @kubotaorange76 refers to the truck as a "time capsule," a sentiment echoed by @mgyoung, who agrees it is indeed a time capsule. @Oldnfast appreciates the long ownership and care taken by the previous owner, expressing that they would happily overpay if they won the lottery. @RWB_AZ describes the truck as "one fine looking truck" and wishes luck with the auction. @mgyoung emphasizes the compliments and mentions that the truck is a rare find due to the care it has received over the years. @carchasers notes the truck's amazing condition, highlighting that it had to be well looked after to avoid the common deterioration seen in similar models from the era.
Neutral: @HuntBuck7 inquires about the availability of personal service records for the truck, considering it a nice and rare model from the mid-80s. @Compair8 asks about the functioning of the rear fuel tank and any potential issues. @IconPizza queries whether all features of the truck work properly, such as the A/C, heat, and 4x4 system. @Mr547 is interested if the paint on the truck is original, while @dmose compliments the truck's overall condition. @EKP raises a question regarding the mileage shown on the odometer, suggesting the possibility of it having rolled over due to the truck's age.
Negative: @mgyoung (The Seller) mentions that the rear fuel tank has not been in use for a year because it ran a little rough. They suspect there may be an issue with the gas or filter screen in that tank. Despite the car's great condition, the question of its rear fuel tank functioning may concern potential buyers who are cautious about purchasing a classic vehicle with unknown issues.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors generally express admiration for the vehicle's build quality, with @Davebrookins praising the aesthetics and requesting a driving video. @BaerBronco echoes this enthusiasm, highlighting the appealing color scheme and the unique Coyote engine feature. @CB65 shares a similar opinion, complimenting the overall craftsmanship and configuration, while @cruisewoodward relates positively to the truck's nostalgic appeal, having owned a similar model in the past. Additionally, @Rct2791 appreciates the color combination, reflecting a favorable sentiment across the board.
Neutral: There are comments that maintain a neutral tone, such as @TidyRigs, who appreciates the honesty of the listing, which indicates transparency in the sale process. The exchanges between bidders also reflect neutrality, like @Davebrookins seeking feedback from @lookbothways about bidding strategies without any indication of offense or friction. There’s an ongoing dialogue regarding the vehicle's specifics, like engine history, showing both interest and cautious inquiry without overt positivity or negativity.
Negative: On the negative front, @lookbothways received a flag for non-constructive criticism, suggesting some comments about the truck may have been viewed unfavorably by other users. Furthermore, @Davebrookins addresses criticism towards his bidding activity, expressing frustration and seeking advice on auction processes, indicating a slightly tense atmosphere for inexperienced bidders. Additionally, @pilcherdoug, the seller, acknowledges the vehicle's dirty state from pollen, which can imply a lack of cleanliness that might deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciate the aesthetic and character of the vehicle, noting the appealing tangerine color and wheel choice. @70_duster called it a 'great wheel choice', while @mef0629 highlighted the love for the tangerine shade. @Frank_Barrett and @calcowboy emphasized that small imperfections add character to the car, contributing to its charm. Overall, many express admiration for the vehicle and its potential as a valuable classic car.
Neutral: Several comments raised questions about the condition of the car, particularly regarding the seats and the potential rust issues. @bnhappy55 noted the common wear pattern seen on similar vehicles, while @psyman highlighted the lack of detailed information regarding the engine rebuild. @jpchase requested images of areas speculated to be affected by corrosion, and @stevegm5 (The Seller) promised to address these concerns and provide additional details. Commenters seemed generally interested in the car's history and would appreciate input from the seller to clarify uncertainties.
Negative: Some concerns about the condition of the vehicle were expressed, including the state of the seats, which several commenters, such as @Three56SC, remarked appeared to be in poor condition, indicative of aging. @psyman pointed out the absence of detailed records on engine work following the 2010 rebuild, raising questions about maintenance. @Imatwin70's inquiry about leaks led to further discussion about minor cosmetic issues identified by the seller, leaving potential buyers with lingering doubts about the overall mechanical soundness of the 912.
|
 |
Positive: @BMWE90Guy praises the impressive array of over $48 in options included with the car, comparing it favorably to the price of a steak dinner. @jasperjohnson expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, sharing their personal experience with a similar model, highlighting the practicality of the plug-in hybrid and the thrilling performance of the 670 hp V8 engine, alongside luxury features like the Burmeister stereo system and massaging seats. @TKAD (The Seller) echoes this sentiment, stating that the specific car being sold has all the desired performance and aesthetic options, emphasizing the importance of selecting the right specification when purchasing a high-end vehicle like this.
Neutral: @swoop1156 shares their own positive ownership experience with a closely related model, describing their strong attachment to the Cayenne and noting some perceived downgrades in interior quality in newer models. @Sporty1 inquires about the potential to add a hitch to the Cayenne, which suggests they are interested in the vehicle's functionality as well as its luxury details. @mistermayor comments on the evolving nature of Porsche models, reflecting on the differences experienced between their past and current vehicle preferences, indicating a transition in design and feel that others may relate to.
Negative: @toadsalesman points out a lack of a hitch on an otherwise fully-optioned vehicle, suggesting it's a disappointing oversight. @TKAD (The Seller) acknowledges comments regarding the perceived decline in the quality and driving experience of newer Porsche models, implying that the current generation lacks the charm and tactile feedback that older models offered. @PMG1 adds to this criticism, noting that the nuances of driving experience are indeed changing, expressing some nostalgia for older designs and hinting that their wife's new Cayenne GTS feels lacking in comparison to previous iterations.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and charm. @66Goat remarked on its attractiveness, while @GBRBiLL reflected fondly on a similar model, stating it's a very nice truck. The seller, @dogpaws, engaged positively with potential buyers, offering insights about the truck's features and addressing questions with enthusiasm and appreciation for the interest shown in the classic vehicle. They emphasized its reliability and the work put into its restoration, affirming that it is fit for driving.
Neutral: The seller provided detailed responses to questions regarding the truck's specifications and state. @ss2myers inquired about the unusual storage in the truck bed, to which @dogpaws clarified that a 1947 foot locker is utilized for small items rather than hiding any damage. Comments regarding the truck's history and condition revealed that while there might have been minor rust repairs, the seller did not believe there had been significant corrosion but acknowledged that the vehicle had undergone improvements since their purchase.
Negative: Some concerns were noted regarding the truck's overall condition and practicality. @ccpanel and @generalike asked specific questions about the vehicle's speed capabilities and any potential leaks, indicating a cautious interest in its reliability as a classic vehicle. @dogpaws addressed these inquiries directly, noting the truck's comfortable speed range and confirming that there were no major leaks, though they acknowledged some minor drips previously experienced before modifications were made. Overall, the discussion revealed a mix of enthusiasm tempered with practicality, highlighting the necessity of routine maintenance for such an aged vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the 2014 Ferrari California 30, particularly highlighting its aesthetic appeal and unique features. @johnnyb11 expresses enthusiasm with a simple 'Nice!', while @mike_747 notes that the car looks 'especially sharp in blue TDF' and believes it will perform well in the auction. @boaboyoz describes the car as 'incredibly stylish' and 'a scintillating specimen', emphasizing its appealing color combination, and @barrettautogroup (The Seller) touts the vehicle's features, including the rare Handling Speciale package that enhances the driving experience.
Neutral: Several commenters are seeking additional information about the vehicle's condition and history. @VickMan inquires about a California smog certificate, while @LACarDude calls the California 30 a 'nice looking' model. @Longforlineup and @Johncia request more images and videos of the car, indicating a desire for further visual context. @fastcash21 raises concerns about potential stickiness with the buttons, suggesting that this is a common issue among similar models, to which @barrettautogroup (The Seller) assures that this car does not have such problems, indicating its well-maintained condition.
Negative: Some users express concern regarding the upkeep and potential issues with the car. @jackinmidtown points out an existing open recall which could complicate the sale, and @fastcash21 questions the seals on the convertible top, noting typical problems that arise in older convertibles. @4Corsa_ raises a common issue about headlights and missing LEDs, reflecting frustration with perceived quality control. The comments reveal a tension between admiration for the vehicle's specifications and apprehensions about its maintenance history and current state.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight that the vehicle, despite some issues with the paint job, has a lot of positive aspects. @jreese930 mentions that the truck has been recognized with many car show awards and praises its mechanical condition, stating it is 'mechanically like new'. Additionally, other commenters like @SometimesHandy agree that the vehicle is still acceptable for driving, indicating a level of confidence in its usability and condition. @jreese930 also expresses excitement for the next owner to enjoy the truck, emphasizing its appeal and history.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the paint job, situating it in a neutral context. @larryelk and @Raylc raise concerns about the paint's texture and quality, suggesting it might be reminiscent of a Maco paint job, with @Mordizzle noting that it appears to have poor preparation despite being an expensive paint job. @Gregpryckman provides a light-hearted counter, acknowledging these critiques but agreeing that the overall truck is beautiful and valued, particularly noting the mechanical upgrades that have been completed. @jreese930's response acknowledges the paint issue while also defending its past quality and shine, showing that it still holds some visual appeal.
Negative: On the negative side, the comments point out significant concerns regarding the paint condition of the truck. @larryelk questions the workmanship, while @Raylc reinforces this by implying the paint quality lacks professionalism. @Mordizzle's comment about the paint being expensive yet poorly prepped suggests dissatisfaction with how the vehicle has been maintained visually over time. @jreese930 recognizes that the paint has begun to bubble after relocating to South Carolina and attributes it to environmental factors, indicating that while the mechanical parts are strong, there are undeniable visual imperfections that could deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and upgrades. @Singerirv called it beautiful, particularly praising the Xk6 engine. @P4tMotorcars mentioned the perfect color combination and the car's overall great condition, highlighting its rarity in the current market. @Ngsd101 supported the benefits of the 5-speed transmission upgrade, and @zachmac emphasized the thoughtful modifications that enhance driving experience, commending the seller for these choices. The overall sentiment is one of admiration for the vehicle's design, color, and modifications that make it appealing to collectors and enthusiasts alike.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific details regarding the vehicle's condition and specifications. @alexandariliya and @kazarbarzin requested a driving video, while @Charlie_2570 asked for information on the date codes of the tires. @Mccaughanm and @rockitdoc sought clarification on any potential negatives associated with the car, aiming to gather more information before making bidding decisions. The seller, @smithimports1985, responded to many of these inquiries, promising to provide updates and driving videos while confirming the car's meticulous restoration history.
Negative: A few comments pointed out concerns regarding the car's details and auction conditions. @DB6 noted disappointment with the $400 document fee, indicating it felt petty. @reformedwallstreeter suggested delaying the auction until a driving video and key issue were resolved. Additionally, @davidxk raised doubts about the age and condition of the tires, emphasizing the importance of ensuring safety and reliability. Such feedback suggests that while the vehicle garners admiration, there are practical concerns that potential buyers feel should be addressed before proceeding with bids.
|
 |
Positive: @MK113 (The Seller) is approachable and eager to assist potential buyers, indicating a strong willingness to answer questions and provide additional information about the vehicle. This level of customer service can create a positive impression for prospective buyers who feel supported in their decision-making process.
Neutral: The comment from @gauldingr regarding a YouTube video highlights that there is additional multimedia content available about the vehicle, which may serve as a valuable resource for those interested in understanding more about its features and performance. It reflects a curiosity about the vehicle beyond just the written details.
Negative: There are no negative comments reflected in the comments provided. The interactions center around the seller's support and the available multimedia content without any critiques or issues being mentioned.
|
 |
Positive: Comments surrounding the vehicle highlight its stunning build quality and beautiful aesthetics, particularly the attractive color that many liken to 'Candy Apple Red'. @Super-Dave and @Darkvoltage express their admiration for the restoration, with @Darkvoltage noting that they never tire of the restoration of 1969 Camaros. Enthusiasts like @lunchbocks2002 appreciate the paint and engine upgrades, while also acknowledging that the no-reserve auction opens opportunities for potential buyers to invest in the vehicle while making any additional adjustments needed. Many commenters, including @Moparmanbet and @bbrs, commend it as a standout restomod Camaro, ideal for car shows and cruising.
Neutral: The seller, @cars20thcentury, is attentive to questions and informative regarding several vehicle aspects, enlightening interested bidders about the car's adjustments and features. Various commenters inquire about the car's stance, pointing out that the driver’s rear side appears lower than the passenger side, a concern that @cars20thcentury is looking into by consulting with a technician. The question of the car's history with modifications also comes up, with some participants noting previous turbo installations from earlier ownership, reflecting on how modern upgrades have altered its traditional structure.
Negative: Several comments indicate potential concerns regarding the car's condition, particularly the suspension alignment, as raised by @KSS66 and @Moparmanbet, indicating it may be leaning to one side. @NJPI1963 brought attention to possible damage reflected in a specific photo, while @Jerryray and @MaseratiDave seek additional side pictures taken on level ground to better ascertain the vehicle’s stance. Questions persist about the car's dyno testing results and the functionality of the stereo system, with some commenters expressing dissatisfaction or skepticism about the completeness and performance of the restoration work, particularly regarding its ability to handle speeds above 35 mph as highlighted by @BurtonTPA.
|
 |
Positive: @19Willys46 praised the vehicle's appearance, describing it as a very nice looking Roadster. @ProfGriff complimented the MGB, calling it nice, original, and with low mileage, highlighting its essentially one owner status and the quality job done on the interior and mechanical refresh. He foresees that this car will bring joy to its new owner. @20bar also noted the car's clean condition, while @xxranch expressed admiration for the original details and emphasized that it should fetch a good price at auction, showcasing their impression of the vehicle as a great example of an MGB.
Neutral: @Rogerquest confirmed that the vehicle has low mileage and filled in some details such as the successful compression test results, stating all cylinders were in the 130s. They also mentioned not knowing why the heater was not functioning, as well as their decision to sell it soon after their father's passing. @ACDarata added insight into the restoration quality, giving a positive note on the work done by Ron Redding, indicating that buyers will receive a solid car due to the high standards of restoration.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, there were some concerns regarding the vehicle. @Clappo pointed out that the heater had been completely bypassed and questioned why, hinting at potential issues with the heater core. @joesalfa was curious about the compression test results, leading to a brief moment of confusion that was later resolved by @Rogerquest. Additionally, @20bar raised a question about potential rust, eager to see photos of specific parts of the car, which indicates some apprehension among prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @JDDale comments on the vehicle's outstanding appearance, expressing admiration for its looks and wishing luck to the seller. @Sparrownaut shares a personal connection to the Colony Park, highlighting that it holds a special place among their favorite cars. @oldsmobile98 appreciates the modern features of the late first-gen Panther cars, asserting that they combine classic aesthetics with reliability. @Mercury88 acknowledges the seller's detailed responses about the car's features, expressing satisfaction with the information provided, particularly regarding the traction lock.
Neutral: @smc128 (The Seller) engages with commenters, providing responses to questions about the car's functionality, including the rear air suspension and the AC system. They clarify that any moisture seen in the photos is simply morning dew on the exterior of the windshield. @johnjm notes the vehicle's historical significance as a premium wagon from Ford, capable of being equipped at near-Lincoln levels, and appreciates the detail of the 1989 plate shown.
Negative: @Bg_Lebowski humorously implies that the vehicle's condition suggests a musty interior, predicting it smells unpleasantly. @Goldbondh2o makes a sarcastic remark about the desirability of the Colony Park, suggesting that no one is clamoring for it. @Oregonnative questions the condition of the windshield, indicating concern over moisture, which could suggest neglect. Overall, these comments reflect skepticism and light-hearted criticism regarding the vehicle's presentation.
|
 |
Positive: @Nickgplv commented positively on the vehicle's appearance, describing it as a nice looking X. He also expressed a connection by mentioning that he owns an unaltered twin to the vehicle in question, suggesting that he has a certain appreciation for it.
Neutral: @Kcrabtree, the seller, responded to inquiries about the vehicle's engine hours post-restoration, estimating that it has about 75-100 hours of usage since its engine overhaul 21 years ago. He added that the vehicle mainly stays in his shop and is occasionally taken for a spin around the yard, indicating a moderate level of use without frequent riding.
Negative: There were no negative comments directly about the vehicle in the provided remarks. However, @Capthorod1's inquiry about the hours since the engine overhaul implies a concern regarding the vehicle's usage and maintenance history, displaying a cautious perspective from a potential buyer.
|
 |
Positive: @MikeDTaz appreciates the vehicle, noting that while it shows signs of wear and requires some care, its foundations are solid. @BEhotJoe suggests the car is a good option despite low bidding, hinting at external factors like market timing affecting buyer interest. Several commentors express that the vehicle looks appealing and carries potential with further investment.
Neutral: @ReconRanger asks if any videos of the vehicle will be shared, prompting a response from @mcqueens that videos are forthcoming. @Travis230 inquires about the vehicle's condition and logistics, receiving confirmation about its usability. @k5shawn offers insights about perceived top damage and clarifies it is likely just factory seams rather than cracks, while also addressing the tailgate issue.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly about its underside and needed repairs, highlighted by @bac15 who mentions the need for a total drivetrain overhaul and other maintenance. Additionally, @Daddyvic questions the functionality of the tailgate, indicating a potential mechanical issue. @Ksruffin points out a lack of video updates, suggesting that uncertainty around the vehicle's condition might be stalling higher bids.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle's unique features, with @AsherSPG calling it the wildest thing he's ever seen, highlighting components like vibrating mirrors, a glass canopy roof, and a fragrance generator. The overall impression of the vehicle is that it is an impressive and multifaceted automobile, as noted by @jcwvfr's enthusiasm about its coolness, and @Constirewalt's remarks about its uniqueness. @abear98, the seller, also shared positive insights on the car’s functionality, describing how the heated and vibrating mirrors work to enhance visibility as a neat feature that operates effectively.
Neutral: Several comments focused on seeking specific information regarding the vehicle. @EvanJahn displayed interest in the AirFantasy Fragrance Control system, inquiring about its functionality, while @GneissProspekt asked for measurements of the cargo area and @Arzupancic requested video evidence of the car's cold start and driving capabilities. @TXDesFox raised clarifying questions regarding the presence of cruise control and the condition of the windshield in the videos, indicating a need for further discussion on these aspects.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition, as @cheezee asked about the extent of rust underneath the car, stating it was hard to determine the severity from photos. @TXDesFox pointed out visible specks of what seemed to be dirt or imperfections on the car's paint and windshield, which led to questions about their true nature. @abear98 noted visible corrosion but admitted to not having full access for an in-depth inspection, suggesting a potential lack of transparency regarding the car's structural integrity.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance, with @CometGirl427 noting, "She's gorgeous." Furthermore, @Monarch (The Seller) reassured potential buyers about the car's mechanical condition, stating it has been well-maintained, with normal wear and tear but no major issues, rust, or significant dents. The seller provided evidence of regular inspections and a clean Carfax report, which highlighted that the vehicle had passed all emissions tests and major services were performed by highly-rated specialists.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on specific details about the vehicle's history, such as @mtish36 asking about service records and potential issues, and @jimspo inquiring about the soft top and water resistance of the interior. @bridog63 raised questions about gaps in the Carfax report, specifically between 1998 and 2010, which the seller addressed by explaining that the vehicle was exported and re-imported, as it had been a corporate vehicle. The seller maintained that the Carfax provided a complete account of the vehicle's records.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's past, particularly about the export entry in 1998, as highlighted by @bridog63, who noted that this entry seemed unusual. Others expressed skepticism, questioning the lack of documentation for the vehicle's history between 1998 and 2010 and the absence of direct service records. @Fitzroya pointed out potential rust issues and missing components, indicating that these could detract from the vehicle's overall appeal, while @cblume questioned the condition of the original seats beneath the upholstery.
|
 |
Positive: @70_duster highlights Ducati's reputation for producing aesthetically appealing motorcycles. @RyanDub and @Mikejr89 echo this sentiment, expressing their attraction to the bike's appearance and showing interest in the auction. @Gillishousebmw mentions the bike's potential curb appeal, suggesting the removal of front reflectors for an even sleeker look. @inthearenax (The Seller), reassures potential buyers about the bike's value, stating that the factory side fairings enhance its overall appeal. Other comments from enthusiasts like @Jackz4 consider the bike a rolling piece of art, with @JosephDeLuca1978 acknowledging the rarity and desirability of the model.
Neutral: Several commenters raised important questions regarding maintenance and specific components of the bike. @caferacerqueen inquired about the originality of the fuel tank and its compatibility with U.S. fuel standards, while @CarFaninCT shared personal experience regarding the longevity of the original fuel tank. @Elderber expressed curiosity about how the auction would progress, and @Zoomie added technical insights on tank swelling issues, suggesting preventive measures. @darthmalaguti discussed the bike's accessories available at dealerships, reinforcing that these models often have customizations through optional parts. @Ishouldknowbetterbynow requested a compression test confirmation, which @inthearenax (The Seller) promptly addressed, emphasizing that concerns about stuck pistons were mitigated.
Negative: Despite the aesthetic appeal, some users raised concerns about the bike’s performance and reliability. @apexal expressed disappointment, labeling it the worst Ducati he owned due to various riding issues, a sentiment shared by @motoFiend, who asked for elaboration on these concerns. Common problems highlighted include the expanding fuel tank and overheating rectifier, with solutions proposed such as switching to non-ethanol fuel. @Ishouldknowbetterbynow mentioned mechanical issues needing attention, further emphasizing potential pitfalls of ownership. Overall, while the bike is celebrated for its design and rarity, there is a clear awareness of maintenance challenges among the community.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the stunning restoration and rarity of the 1956 Continental Mark II, with several commenters expressing admiration for its beauty and craftsmanship. @GenauAutoWerks notes that only 2550 were produced in 1956, emphasizing its exclusivity. Enthusiasts like @boaboyoz and @chefgordiemac describe the vehicle as effortlessly elegant and one of the most beautiful cars ever produced. @SBT mentions the meticulous care taken by the current owner and their mechanic, reaffirming that the car is in top condition and a true classic gem.
Many users share their excitement about the vehicle and express interest in the auction, indicating that the car is gathering considerable attention with bids starting high, as noted by @GlennD46, who believes it will do well given its early bids.
Neutral: Commenters posed several inquiries regarding the car's condition, restoration details, and specific features, reflecting a cautious interest. @DVino inquired about the exhaust system, interior condition, and whether the engine was overhauled, while others like @RobGUE pointed out discrepancies in the car's original specifications related to air conditioning and vent locations. @neilpierson25 requested clarification about the dome light switch and imperfections that could potentially lead to safety issues. @Magnerfin and @rfm45 raised questions about the vehicle's frame and integrity, demonstrating a mix of enthusiasm and a desire for comprehensive information before bidding.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about the vehicle's restoration and originality, particularly regarding air conditioning and specific factory features that might not align with the seller's representation. @RobGUE and @billyblyth noted inconsistencies related to aftermarket modifications that could detract from the car's perceived value. Additionally, @neilpierson25 expressed concern about safety issues regarding the dome light installation, suggesting a lack of attention to detail in some aspects of the car's maintenance. Overall, while the majority appreciated the car's aesthetics, some expressed skepticism about the integrity of its modifications and original features.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the CLK55 AMG for its quality and performance. @CoopCity expressed curiosity about the value for money, suggesting it's a great bargain for a V8 Mercedes. @joelginaldi highlighted the impressive handling and performance that he experienced with a previous model and mentioned a mod that enhanced the engine's sound. Others, like @GyllesSmyth, shared their personal positive experiences, noting reliability and maintenance ease, while @Bad_Chadi (The Seller) detailed the car's exceptional handling, acceleration, and the smooth operation of its various features, presenting the CLK55 as an exemplary daily driver.
Neutral: Commenters raised some general inquiries about the vehicle's condition and features. @Carrerachas noted the discrepancy about open recalls mentioned in the listing and indicated they could not find any in the Carfax. @TobinMotorWorks asked about the status of the back wing, while @JZSL inquired about the number of keys. @Thelegazy sought information about the performance of the A/C and heater, along with the seat heaters. The comments indicated that potential buyers were seeking clarification on specific aspects rather than expressing strong opinions either way.
Negative: A few concerns were raised by users regarding the CLK55 AMG. @Gs82 pointed out some common issues related to oil leaks and the tendency of rear tires to wear faster than front ones, indicating a need for careful maintenance. Additionally, the user criticized the shifter switches on the steering wheel, describing them as feeling cheap. @Bad_Chadi (The Seller) addressed some of these concerns by providing maintenance records and assurance about previous work done on the car, but the comments did highlight some aspects that could be seen as drawbacks for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Several users expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's overall condition and its classic features. @91crxtacy highlighted the nostalgic charm of the Borbet Type C rims, which were trendy in the 90s. @vwvwvw and @Mathew00 noted the car's relatively clean appearance, particularly the undercarriage and rockers, suggesting that the vehicle could use some love but isn't concerning. @Bob_MX5, who has extensive experience with Miatas, noted that while the car needs some baseline maintenance, it has the potential to be a great daily driver. His comments indicated assurance in the vehicle's capability, especially if care is taken to address known issues.
Neutral: A number of commenters raised questions and concerns regarding the history and maintenance of the car. @rkula inquired about the timing belt status and its service record, noting its importance for prospective buyers. @DJP1124 and @enve requested additional photos and a driving video to verify the car's condition, specifically asking about the clutch and rust-prone areas. There was also a discussion regarding potential upkeep that may be required, with @SDCR providing suggestions for dealing with minor corrosion and rust, suggesting that it could be manageable with the right care. @mcqueens, the seller, provided clarifications on service details and the recent modifications, such as the switch from OBD1 to OBD2.
Negative: Concerns about rust and maintenance surfaced throughout the comments. @Diamond_Dave pointed out that the vehicle likely has deferred maintenance, suggesting it will require immediate attention for issues like the timing belt, water pump, and potential radiator replacement. @Bob_MX5 explicitly called out the rust concerns, indicating that while the visible corrosion on the chassis is manageable, it does require attention and that the clear coat is failing, which could detract from the car's appeal. Moreover, the persistent airbag warning light raised flags for @nimaf and @rma97, bringing up potential safety and emissions concerns, which could complicate ownership. Overall, while some see the charm and potential, many voices urge bidders to be cautious and fully informed about the car's challenges.
|
 |
Positive: @SupraFreak comments on the vehicle's excellent condition, describing it as a 'sweet Taco' that is 'super clean from top to bottom.' They note that it is equipped with break-in mileage and highlight its significance as the last of the first generation Tacomas. The comment shows optimism regarding the auction outcome, suggesting it will perform very well given its unique characteristics. @MBHAuto, the seller, emphasizes the Tacoma's desirable features, like its double cab design, California ownership, and comprehensive maintenance history, attracting a diverse range of potential buyers, including families and outdoor pet owners.
Neutral: @IEsurfer points out that while double cabs are typical in SoCal, a clean, low-mileage 4WD version is rare and hints at the auction's potential for a high final bid due to the vehicle's attributes. The seller reassures prospective buyers with answers about the vehicle's air conditioning system and emissions equipment, confirming the original catalytic converter is intact and that it is smog compliant, which maintains transparency during the sale process.
Negative: There are a few inquiries that highlight potential concerns or details that need clarification, such as @rgfulks asking about the air conditioning condition and @Rooki3 inquiring about the status of the catalytic converters and potential for a smog certificate. These questions, while not overtly negative, suggest that some bidders may be cautious or looking for reassurances regarding the vehicle's compliance and current condition before placing bids.
|
Gasser-Style, 502-Powered 1955 Chevrolet 210 2-Door Sedan 4-Speed
VB55K047180
Lot 235164
Private Party
 |
Positive: @RHG357 shares fond memories of the Brandimere speedway, highlighting its unique features and the thrill of racing events, such as the Fun Ford Series. @gasser210 (The Seller) mentions running a best time of 12.6 seconds at a high elevation, hinting at the car's potential performance on lower elevations. @CSX427 and @Mike_Breinin express their excitement for the car's design and performance potential, with @Mike_Breinin suggesting it could reach impressive speeds under optimal conditions. @wapsirat and @Breezejammer appreciate the car's current aesthetics, with one commenter suggesting that a flat black finish would enhance its look, while the latter simply admires the vehicle's gasser styling.
Neutral: Several commenters reminisce about racing experiences related to locations linked to the car, such as Longmont, Colorado, and drag strips in Michigan. @Richard reflects on drag racing history and offers perspective on the car's time, emphasizing how a specific 12:60 second run may not be noteworthy. @gasser210 (The Seller) responds to questions about the vehicle's weight and construction, providing clarifications about its specs and performance capabilities, indicating that it runs on pump gas and has specific sound modifications to ease noise levels.
Negative: @Richard's comment implies that the car's best time isn't particularly impressive, providing a contrasting perspective on expectations for performance. @FatBud questions the materials used for the doors, showcasing skepticism about the car's construction. Additionally, questions about the noise level produced by the vehicle raise concerns regarding legality and neighborhood disturbance, as indicated by @PSFarm's comment about 'pissing off the neighbors since 2018.' Overall, while most comments are enthusiastic, there are some reservations regarding the car's performance and build.
|
 |
Positive: Several commentators expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning color and overall beauty. @MBrouder simply called it a beauty, while @Tripledigit remarked that Minerva Blue has never looked better. @Mike_Breinin praised the color choice, stating it compensates for the car being a Targa and lacking the coupe's lines, reinforcing the idea that Porsche's color palette is unmatched. Seller @RPExotics emphasized the vibrant Minerva Blue and mentioned the extensive documentation detailing the car's care, which further adds to its appeal.
Neutral: Comments from various users indicated an interest in the vehicle's history and condition without overt enthusiasm. @richardorenstein sought clarification on the vehicle not being a Carrera but rather an 'S' trim model. @MrWolf expressed curiosity about the paint work, noting the detailed invoices seem extensive, and asked about the AC functionality. User @bradleyt09 requested assurances regarding certain minor fixes and expressed appreciation for the seller's responsiveness to questions.
Negative: A few concerns were raised regarding the potential running issues and past repairs. @aggievic flagged previous invoices suggesting the car had run rough and inquired about a potential major accident due to the insurance involvement in the paint invoice. @katascopos echoed this sentiment, noting the same running issues persisted over service visits, which raised doubts about the car’s reliability. @TurfGuy58 inquired about oil leaks, showing a cautious perspective towards the vehicle's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Brent804 describes the bike as a very cool item from HRC Japan, wishing potential buyers good luck and expressing appreciation for its aesthetic. @Jackz4 shares excitement about seeing a trials bike listed, noting that it is a cool find.
Neutral: @Denio27 provides a nostalgic account related to the bike, mentioning its unique construction and the connection to Eddie Lejune, linking it to memories from 1986. This comment reflects a historical perspective rather than a direct opinion on the bike's current value or performance.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: @KWAChevyGuy praises the truck as a "Sweet little Sonoma" equipped with a 4.3V6 engine and 4WD, highlighting its desirable features. @Cdstukey echoes this sentiment, anticipating the truck's popularity and expressing appreciation for its great engine. @1098s312rMIKE also admires the truck, calling it a "wonderful little Blue truck," and @Acorn19 confidently states that it will be hard to find one in better condition.
Neutral: @motherduce inquires about the towing capacity, while @Beige1968GTO provides a detailed response that the truck can tow 4000lbs with a class 3 hitch and up to 6000lbs with a weight distributing hitch. @YB02 asks for additional pictures of the rear bumper and the condition of the truck bed, indicating that potential buyers are seeking more information before making a decision. @tifjeslil, the seller, engages with comments about whether a cold start and driving video will be posted, answering directly to @cast86 and @JDPhoto.
Negative: @Beige1968GTO mentions personal experience with a similar truck that was stolen and expresses reluctance to pursue the current offer despite recognizing the truck's quality, indicating a sense of loss. The need for clarification on vehicle conditions from @YB02 and @bigchungus420 regarding specific functionalities like the rear bumper condition and the 4WD performance hints at potential concerns regarding the truck's state. Overall, while there are mixed feelings, the overall feedback suggests a level of caution among interested parties.
|
 |
Positive: The auction for the Mercedes-Benz ML has received enthusiastic comments about its well-maintained condition. @Imgroup (The Seller) provided detailed service records that assure potential buyers of the vehicle's care over its lifespan, highlighting recent maintenance efforts including brake checks, oil changes, and emissions inspections. The seller also reassured prospective buyers regarding the vehicle's compliance with Texas Emissions and Safety Inspection, which suggests reliability and trustworthiness.
Neutral: Questions from potential buyers focused on the availability of service records and the status of various components. @Krakenmurphy88 inquired about maintenance specifics and any diesel-related issues, to which @Imgroup (The Seller) provided comprehensive service history, confirming that major components had been checked and maintained. Additionally, @dmose asked about tire age, and @SoundoftheSuburbs queried about the timing chain's original status, indicating that buyers are keen to understand the vehicle's overall condition and potential future expenses.
Negative: Concerns arose regarding specific components of the vehicle. @Bart8700 was particularly focused on emissions equipment and raised the question about whether it would meet California's regulatory requirements. Although @Imgroup (The Seller) confirmed the vehicle's compliance with Texas regulations, uncertainty remains for out-of-state buyers regarding emissions compliance. Moreover, @SoundoftheSuburbs expressed doubts about the timing chain itself, noting that while the tensioner was replaced, it was unclear if the chain had been addressed, highlighting potential worries about the vehicle's maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the Aston Martin Vanquish S Coupe, highlighting its beautiful design and distinctive features. @mugskillet particularly emphasized the appealing sound of the V12 engine, which is a significant aspect for car enthusiasts. @Hulk2000 also noted the inclusion of an umbrella, praising it as a charming and practical touch. Additionally, @carjockey shared their positive experience from owning the vehicle, stating that it performed flawlessly over 4,500 miles without any engine issues, which adds credibility to its allure as a luxury sports car.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, with @eshum suggesting that while multi-colored designs are generally favored, the elegance of the mk II Vanquish makes it look best in a single color. @FSAR raised questions about the vehicle's history, seeking clarification on past issues and whether proper solutions were implemented, showing a balanced view of the car's background. @WAT4 proposed a potential solution for the red exterior accents, suggesting that a specific type of protective film could enhance its look. These comments reflect a general interest in the car's appearance and performance, indicating that it is viewed as a desirable vehicle overall.
Negative: However, there were concerns regarding the vehicle's history, particularly related to a previous buy-back due to a recurring check engine light issue. @Khand deleted comments questioning the vehicle's lemon law branding, while @Sniff38 sought clarification if the issue was genuinely resolved or merely a case of user error, suggesting lingering doubts about its reliability. @FSAR brought up the potential impacts of having a buy-back title, noting that such vehicles typically sell at a reduced price, contributing to the apprehension among some prospective buyers. Overall, these remarks indicated a cautious attitude toward the car's past, reflecting a common hesitation among buyers when it comes to vehicles with complex histories.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle for its clean and beautiful restoration. @SteeleArmstrong expressed admiration by noting the bike's cleanliness, while @Mainjet complimented the details of the restoration, particularly asking about the pipe, indicating a high level of interest. @Nickgplv noted that the bike looked better than others from the same era, reflecting its attractive condition. @Lawyerposm and @Mitziebikes echoed similar sentiments, with Lawyerposm specifically stating it was a beautiful bike and wanting to learn more.
Neutral: The Seller, @Hamneggs, interacted positively with potential buyers, acknowledging @Mainjet's observation about the cotter pins and providing technical details about the bike's restoration. @Lawyerposm inquired about various technical aspects, such as rust in the tank and condition of engine internals. @browndog had practical questions about the lighting functions and gas tank condition, indicating a thorough interest rather than outright criticism or praise.
Negative: However, there were some concerns raised about the bike. @Lawyerposm questioned the rust inside the tank and the thoroughness of engine work done, while @browndog asked for specifics regarding the functionality of the lights and the condition of the tank's interior, suggesting that these aspects might not be fully satisfactory. These inquiries imply that while the bike has been well-restored, there are still areas of concern that potential buyers might need to consider.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a highly favorable view of the 2013 Porsche Cayenne Diesel being sold by @ztrautohaus. Commenters such as @campodf and @rjcp1 praise its remarkable condition and low mileage, highlighting features like the well-preserved rear seats and unique contrast stitching. @TBrooks emphasizes that it might be one of the lowest mileage Cayenne Diesels available, reinforcing the appeal of its condition. The thorough documentation and service records provided by @ztrautohaus also contribute positively to the perceived value of the vehicle, indicating transparency and reliability in its maintenance history.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @fipenna and @RobertDaniel, inquire about specific technical details and operational capabilities of the vehicle, such as the condition of the transfer case and its towing capacity. @ztrautohaus promptly addresses these questions, confirming that the transfer case has had no issues and providing fuel economy ratings and towing specifications. This interaction adds an informative layer to the discussion, suggesting that potential buyers appreciate detailed insights about the vehicle's performance alongside its overall aesthetic.
Negative: While there are overwhelmingly positive sentiments, @fipenna expresses concern about the lack of transfer case work records, suggesting a level of scrutiny that may indicate hesitation among buyers regarding unknown maintenance histories. However, @ztrautohaus gives reassurance about the Cayenne's mechanical integrity and highlights the absence of known issues. The presence of questions about specific features like heated seats and the hitch installation suggests that buyers may seek more elaborate confirmations, hinting at a cautious approach rather than outright negative commentary.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is reportedly solid and runs and drives well, with a nice cam lope, as described by @Dr.D. The prior owner completed basic maintenance, ensuring that the car is in good driving condition. Feedback from @ssterry confirmed that the vehicle started with a 350ci L48 engine, which aligns with the historical value of the El Camino.
Neutral: @Dr.D provided detailed responses regarding the vehicle's features and modifications, mentioning a replacement of the original heat and defrost unit with a Vintage Air system, as well as the rerouting of heater hoses. The service history was primarily about regular maintenance, with no documentation regarding the suspension or leaks as questioned by @WIZZZZ. As for the paint condition, it was noted that after being stored outside, a brake fluid spill and previous mouse issues caused minor cosmetic damage.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @WIZZZZ about potential issues like a leaking steering box, the state of the suspension, and other leaks, but @Dr.D was unable to confirm details, stating no leaks currently exist. Additionally, @bigdog70 inquired about the lack of air conditioning and specific engine specs, which were unfortunately not available. @Dr.D also pointed out that the paint was affected by storage conditions, indicating a lack of care that could deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Overall, there is keen interest in the vehicle, with multiple commenters drawn to its features and condition. @buddy318 expressed curiosity about the refurbished top and is eager to see the car fully assembled with the top and windows. @justsk8tingby also showed interest in ensuring the Jeepster starts and runs well, indicating a desire for a video showcasing its cold start and driving.
Neutral: Several questions were raised regarding the specifics of the vehicle's features and functioning parts. @justsk8tingby sought clarification on the 'black top' mentioned in the description, noting a lack of visual representation and asking if it was a DIY installation. @carsfromkelly inquired about the operation of the overdrive, while @buddy318 echoed a desire to understand the implications of the 'spare and removed parts' and how it might affect the sale.
Negative: There is a sense of skepticism surrounding the auction, particularly from @justsk8tingby, who remarked on an oddness that could suggest something amiss. This concern implies a lack of confidence in the seller or clarity in the auction process, furthered by inquiries about missing information, like the functionality of the windshield wipers (vacuum), which might deter potential buyers.
|
2019 Volkswagen Jetta GLI 35th Anniversary Edition 6-Speed
3VW5T7BU4KM148235
Lot 235177
Private Party
 |
Positive: @spamofdeath expressed strong enthusiasm for the GLI, highlighting the fun driving experience it offers and its compatibility with GTI parts, noting it should achieve great resale due to its low mileage. @bassmaster64 (The Seller) echoed this sentiment, confirming that the car is enjoyable to drive, and even expressed a desire for a larger garage to accommodate more vehicles. @MCLeather humorously commented on the car's appeal, indicating it has gained attention recently, implying its desirability.
Neutral: @HeadMaster1 reflected on the changing standards of the BAT platform, acknowledging that while the GLI is an appealing car, it is not as exclusive as it once would be, considering it’s just a 7-year-old used vehicle with 60,000 miles. @GageDave shared personal experiences with older VW models, emphasizing reliability and longevity; he remains optimistic about the durability of his newer models despite concerns about newer vehicles overall.
Negative: @divertab2 countered @spamofdeath's claim by pointing out that 60k miles is not particularly low and hinted at a decline in the quality of newer VW models, noting that past VWs lasted longer. He suggested that modern vehicles may suffer from planned obsolescence, which raises concerns about their longevity. @Antoniofal inquired about damage to the vehicle before it was repaired, hinting at potential concerns about the car's history.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received positive remarks for its striking appearance, notably the red soft top which many find appealing. @RichDD expressed admiration for the car's aesthetics and its ability to turn heads, creating an image of luxury and performance that resonates with potential buyers. The Seller, VBAutosport, emphasizes the car's meticulous maintenance and readiness for the auction, assuring bidders that it has been well cared for even at 49k miles. There is a strong emphasis on the vehicle's performance and the confidence in its quality, which is intended to build trust within the community.
Neutral: There are some comments regarding the suggested maintenance and service recommendations for the Audi S5, with @IanJ noting the need for new control arms and spark plugs. However, VBAutosport clarifies that many of these noted repairs were merely recommendations rather than immediate necessities, indicating a comprehensive inspection typical for specialty vehicles. The Seller's transparency in these points seems to be appreciated by the community, as it balances out potential concerns from bidders.
Negative: Despite the vehicle's strengths, there are criticisms about the car's condition. @RichDD questioned the claim of meticulous maintenance, pointing out the unresolved issues with spark plugs and the A/C system, suggesting they contradict the Seller's narrative about the vehicle's upkeep. The mentioning of these needed repairs raised doubts about the overall maintenance history, and it seems @RichDD is seeking more clarity on why certain issues were not yet addressed. This has opened a dialogue about the reliability of the seller's claims and the actual condition of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @April_Learned82 highlights the beauty and excellent condition of the antique automobile, emphasizing its clean engine and the rarity of its factory color combination. Commenters like @Dollycat3 and @buellwinkle express admiration for the vehicle's appearance, stating it's absolutely beautiful and noting that it's like nothing built since its time. @OutOfMyElement also reminisces about the significance of the car, mentioning the connection to his father's experience with a similar model, which adds to the vehicle's special charm.
Neutral: Some commenters are seeking additional information about the car's condition and history. @Dcrt7i asks for specifics about the tires and potential leaks, while @555cruiser expresses concern about a noise heard in video clips and asks for clarification on its source. The vehicle's wheels are being discussed in terms of color, with @Ranchero65 seeking confirmation about them being pink, while @Mordizzle vehemently denies this color attribute. @neilpierson25 humorously observes that opinions are split among potential viewers about the car's appeal.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the condition of the vehicle. @Dcrt7i questions the reason for the quick turnover of the car, hinting at potential issues with its previous ownership. Additionally, @555cruiser mentions a possible rod knock sound from the engine in a video, suggesting there might be underlying mechanical issues despite assurances from @April_Learned82 about the engine's health. Overall, while many comments are positive, there are some apprehensions regarding the vehicle's maintenance and overall reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the 1976 Cadillac Eldorado convertible for its stunning looks and overall driver quality, making it an appealing option for collectors and vintage car enthusiasts alike. @GeneralJackson called it a "stunner," highlighting its appeal to those looking to turn heads. Furthermore, @lloyddon1, the seller, emphasized the car's impressive condition and ease of use, stating it runs and looks amazing while being ready for everyday enjoyment. Comments reflected excitement about the car's new features, such as the modern air conditioning system and the new top, contributing to its attractiveness as a classic piece of automotive history.
Neutral: Several commenters mentioned the car's restoration and condition in a more analytical tone, pointing out areas of concern but also acknowledging its overall driver quality. @history350 remarked on the car's neat design but noted a darkened headlight that was subsequently addressed by @lloyddon1. Others, like @dbluestein, inquired about the authenticity of the leather interior versus vinyl materials, reflecting a desire for clarity on the car's specifications. @CadillacFlashback shared mixed views on the new air conditioning system compared to the original, showcasing the balance between modern convenience and classic aesthetic.
Negative: Criticism emerged around the authenticity of materials and the overall restoration of the vehicle, with comments about "poor lipstick restoration" and vinyl upholstery questioned by @RJAPPRAISE and others like @goldengup. The removal of the catalytic converter raised legal concerns from commenters such as @Noisyboyz, who pointed out potential implications regarding emissions regulations. Additionally, @TheCritic voiced skepticism over some of the seller's enthusiastic claims about performance and condition, suggesting an overstatement of facts and raising doubts about the car's value relative to restoration quality.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @Lord_Fetta, has received praise for offering an ultra low mileage Mercedes SL550 that drives excellently on both highways and city roads, with plenty of power from its nearly 400hp 5.5L V8 engine. Bidders have highlighted the overall excellent condition of this vehicle, noting it feels and drives like new. Commenters, such as @ST454 and @RE1, have shared positive experiences from their previous purchases from the seller, emphasizing the meticulous care the seller puts into preparing the vehicles for auction and the quality of the cars themselves. The seller also offers optional services like the replacement of the faded LCD screen, which several users have found appealing.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's COMAND screen have sparked various opinions among potential buyers. Several users, including @Joseyann and @d00mk0pf, have noted that the screen is common to fade over time, particularly due to sun exposure, mentioning that the functionality remains intact despite the aesthetics. @Static50 indicated that while the screen is faded, it is still readable and mentioned the commonality of this issue in older SL models. @Lord_Fetta has offered transparency by explaining the option to replace the LCD screen for an additional cost, showcasing a willingness to accommodate bidder concerns about the display.
Negative: Some negative comments have arisen regarding the seller's previous auction history, particularly a past auction involving a Porsche 911 that required scrutiny. Users like @Cbct7 and @I-need911 have raised concerns over the seller's experience in selling vehicles and the potential risks of purchasing cars that have circulated through multiple dealers. There are doubts expressed about the seller's handling of prior issues without providing comprehensive documentation. Overall, some bidders believe that while the current vehicle may seem appealing, they remain cautious due to the seller's troubled past with certain cars, leading to skepticism about quality assurances and dealer transparency.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed appreciation for the overall condition and character of the Lexus LS 400. @InHisImage84 noted that the vehicle looked relaxing to drive, mentioning that it would make a wonderful gift for a milestone birthday. @mpeng510 referred to it as a 'beautiful California gem,' while @Prrobinson1 highlighted its low mileage and referred to the color as "Grandma Gold,” adding a sentimental touch. The seller, @SOCON93, emphasized the car's well-maintained state, mentioning recent maintenance service that includes replacing the timing belt and water pump, reassuring potential buyers about its reliability. Comments like these reflect a sense of admiration and nostalgia for the classic vehicle.
Neutral: Comments in the neutral category included inquiries and clarifications about the car's condition and features. @KLN825 asked whether the car had been garaged, while @honda50 expressed curiosity about the road rash visible on the vehicle. @nickstilllikescars raised questions regarding the availability of additional keys and the status of various components, such as the steering wheel and shift knob. Both the seller, @SOCON93, and other commenters engaged in constructive discussions, providing answers to potential buyers while maintaining a cordial atmosphere. This exchange highlighted the interest and diligence of potential buyers gathering relevant information about the car before bidding.
Negative: Conversely, there were concerns raised about the vehicle's condition that leaned towards the negative. @honda50 pointed out the road rash, expressing a desire to see how paint correction might address it. There was also mention of found dents on the driver's rear door by the seller, which could be viewed as a letdown for some. Additionally, @Rhya and @nickstilllikescars raised issues related to vibration at highway speeds and the need for potential maintenance checks on mechanical components. Such comments highlight the cautious approach some bidders are taking, focusing on the vehicle's imperfections and the need for transparency in its condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed excitement and appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetics and build quality. @MontanaBroncos noted that it is a 'great looking cruiser' and mentioned the upcoming 'topless season,' which adds to the appeal for potential buyers looking for a summer vehicle. @boaboyoz referred to it as a 'bloody beauty' and emphasized its gorgeous build, encouraging others with 'GLWTA!' (Good Luck With The Auction). Overall, there is a consensus that the vehicle is visually impressive and well-crafted.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding specific details of the vehicle, indicating a need for clarity on certain aspects. @Ngsd101 raised questions about the VIN and frame matching the title, which shows a concern for authenticity and documentation. @mickeyg1 asked why the head bolts were replaced and inquired about cruising speeds. Responses from @Broncotime (The Seller) clarified that the head gasket was replaced along with the head bolts, and provided a recommended cruising speed of 60-70 mph for the setup, suggesting a reasonable approach to addressing potential concerns.
Negative: Some potential buyers had reservations about certain aspects of the vehicle. @mickeyg1's question about head bolts indicates a concern for mechanical integrity, while @BigWings questioned the completeness of the soft top and noted a potential oversight in the listing. Additionally, @MalibuMotors expressed concern about a possible dent on the driver's side, but the seller assured that it was merely a reflection. These comments reflect a cautious approach from some users, highlighting that while the vehicle is attractive, there are specific concerns that require reassurance.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle for its stunning condition and low mileage, with @busupshut describing it as an "absolutely stunning sample" and @Retrowonder noting it as a beautiful example of a Z34 Nismo. @Searay1994454 emphasized its well-balanced nature and enjoyable handling, while @Supra406 highlighted the special moment these cars represent in automotive history, appreciating the analog driving experience it offers.
Neutral: The seller, @Idonotneedanothercar, provided detailed information about the car's history and conditions, explaining its significance to him and his decision to sell due to personal health reasons. He confirmed the mileage and condition, stating it has been carefully maintained and stored in pristine condition for special occasions. Some commenters, such as @Ka1zen and @power75, engaged in discussions around maintenance details and the car's previous ownership experience, indicating an interest in its overall care and history.
Negative: Despite the many positives, there were minor criticisms and inquiries that arose from the comments. @power75 raised concerns about the absence of paint correction or ceramic coating, and whether the car had any imperfections not shown in the pictures. Additionally, the mention of the front license plate bracket bolts by @power75 suggested that some design choices were less than ideal. Similarly, @KYDEVILDOG asked about tire replacements, indicating a desire to ensure all components of the vehicle were in optimal condition.
|
Turbocharged Vortec-Powered 1956 Chevrolet 5700 Low Cab Forward Car Hauler
5C56L003502
Lot 235180
Private Party
 |
Positive: @maui78 expressed sheer excitement, calling the vehicle "AWESOME!" @GLWA,Greasemnky humorously mentioned desiring something that is unnecessary but appealing. @tildon referred to it as a "monster" and fantasized about showcasing it at car shows. @GPhillips echoed the praise, labeling it as "Total AWESOMENESS!!!" with @DanEhrman reminiscing about his first truck and appreciating the vehicle. @MNBullyBoy emphasized the quality of the build and its impressive engineering, stating it stands out at car shows and is a highly desirable hauler. Other comments praised the design and functionality, with @MUB81 referring to it as a "beautiful piece of functional art."
Neutral: Several inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and features were made, including questions about the height of the rails on the bed and ramp dimensions from @Yenkoman and @Mjandrews. @Jcrews1959, the seller, provided detailed answers on ramp lengths and side rail heights, clarifying the functionality of the vehicle. Other commenters, like @wash1941 and @MUB81, discussed accessory options for loading vehicles and offered suggestions for additional equipment to improve usability. The dialogue indicates a genuine curiosity about practical aspects of the truck while maintaining a level of admiration for its design.
Negative: While the overall reception was positive, there were slight concerns raised among the comments. @j762538 questioned the flatness of the carrier, leading to a clarification from @Jcrews1959 that the bed does not go flat but rather has an angled old-school design. @wash1941 posed a question about whether there is room in the ramp holder slots for longer ramps to improve the approach angle, suggesting potential usability issues for low vehicles. The comments indicate that while the vehicle is generally well-regarded, some commenters still wondered about its practicality in specific scenarios.
|
 |
Positive: The comments from @iakllc (The Seller) highlight a proactive approach to customer inquiries and clarifications regarding the vehicle, including sharing the build sheet and providing assistance on questions about the auction. The seller's engagement, such as reminders about the auction time and their willingness to answer questions, suggests a strong focus on customer service, contributing to a positive perception of the vehicle transaction process.
Neutral: Several users are seeking additional information about the vehicle, with inquiries about tire date codes and shipping rates, which suggests a moderate level of interest in understanding the specifics before making a decision. The request from @jamestielsch about a heads-up display and the observation of a warning light by @MexusaC indicate that potential buyers are analyzing the vehicle’s features and condition, looking for transparency in the details provided by the seller.
Negative: On a negative note, @Ignoramoose expressed concerns about a significant undisclosed issue with the vehicle's window, which the seller acknowledges but feels was not given a fair opportunity to address. This kind of feedback may suggest apprehension among some potential buyers regarding undisclosed problems associated with the vehicle, and it raises concerns about transparency and the condition of the vehicle before purchase.
|
4,400-Mile 2021 Jaguar F-Type R Convertible Heritage 60 Edition
SAJD55FE3MCK76732
Lot 235187
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its aesthetics and overall appeal. @Overextended described it as a 'sensational car that is wildly underrated,' while @NJgolfer called it 'absolutely gorgeous' and one of the best F-Type Rs ever seen. @RotoManiac appreciated its blend of style and comfort, rating it a '10/10' and emphasizing its status as a collector's car. Additionally, @dunkshot32 expressed enthusiasm by labeling it a 'dream car,' highlighting its ideal specifications and the unique convertible format. Overall, the car garnered a reputation as both beautiful and desirable among potential buyers and admirers.
Neutral: Some comments focused on practical details and inquiries about the vehicle's condition and history. @PilotG1 raised questions about the car's past with California emissions tests, which prompted a response from @OneOfThree (The Seller) clarifying that the vehicle had not needed to be smogged yet and that its registration was current. Meanwhile, @BJ123 inquired about the factory warranty, leading to an informative exchange between them and @OneOfThree, who detailed the warranty status and its expiration. @WindOfTheDog brought up maintenance concerns regarding the coolant pipes, which were addressed by other commenters and supplemented with seller insights about recent improvements.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming positivity, a few concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's past use and potential maintenance issues. @dragonfly mentioned the risks associated with purchasing press cars, which are often driven hard by journalists, suggesting caution for prospective buyers. @WindOfTheDog also pointed out that while the car is aesthetically appealing and well cared for, all used vehicles can experience degradation over time, calling into question some maintenance aspects such as the coolant pipe replacements. The discussion surrounding these topics added a layer of practical skepticism to the overall admiration for the car.
|
 |
Positive: @Chrome693 highlighted the joy of this McLaren being driven and enjoyed, contrasting it with often garage-kept supercars. @SteveBerry expressed his satisfaction with the car, stating he had a blast driving it and appreciated the experiences it provided, such as interactions with fans and children who were eager to learn about the car. @TommyC emphasized that the driving experience of the McLaren offers unique joy and fulfillment, reiterating the car's excellent engineering and excitement.
Neutral: @57charlie observed that the design of the McLaren 570S Coupe resembles certain elements of the Chevrolet Corvette CX Concept car. @SteveBerry addressed inquiries about maintenance and past service details on the vehicle, confirming that he had kept track of all maintenance performed and was transparent about the car's service history. Commenters like @alonzo360 and @Bill10 raised questions regarding service documentation and the vehicle's lien status, showcasing the common concerns among potential buyers regarding the car's history and financial obligations.
Negative: @Edmtwentyone pointed out issues with the car's high mileage, lack of exterior carbon components, and interior scratches, expressing a critical view despite admitting a liking for the car. @SteveBerry also acknowledged cosmetic issues with the vehicle, including the possibility of needing a radiator replacement in the future. Overall, some comments conveyed skepticism about the car's condition and value, particularly in light of its history and usage.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, notably highlighting its beauty and unique features. @Rogerspittle described it as a nice car, while @StanCulpepper mentioned he owned a similar model for 40 years, emphasizing the fun of driving the vehicle. Additionally, @AlPalmer10 complimented the car, noting it is very highly optioned, suggesting it would attract significant interest in the market regardless of its documentation. Overall, the car is seen as well-equipped and desirable, with enthusiasts appreciating its historical context and features.
Neutral: There was a significant discussion about the car's engine and documentation, with varying opinions on whether the engine was original or a correct replacement. @Notnow1962 expressed confusion about the engine's originality, while @Shootnride acknowledged the presence of a big block radiator and other features typical of big block cars. The seller, @Johnsongaric, provided clarifications regarding the engine and the build sheet, which some commenters questioned. The conversation reflected both excitement and concern about authenticity and proper documentation of the vehicle's history.
Negative: Concerns arose primarily around the vehicle's engine and the authenticity of its documentation. @Notnow1962 expressed skepticism regarding the car being described as having a replacement engine. There were doubts about the legitimacy of the build sheet, with commenters like @Shootnride clarifying that it was a dealer copy and not what is commonly referred to as a 'tank sticker,' which could lead to confusion among potential buyers. Some commenters questioned the documentation practices from that era and whether the car’s history would be fully verifiable, indicating a level of caution amongst prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Egramisci (The Seller) described the GMC 2500 HD as exceptionally well taken care of, emphasizing the love and sentiment from the family who purchased it new. The seller assured potential buyers that every component of the truck works as intended, including the drivetrain, motor, transmission, brakes, suspension, and steering. The conditions of the windshield and rear window defroster were also highlighted as excellent, further showcasing the truck's maintained quality.
Neutral: Several commenters, such as @lasparky11 and @CajunHO, noted the transmission type and required a correction on the listing regarding the transmission being a 4-speed instead of 5, which reflects an attention to the specifications. Questions were raised by @johnny0620 and @ladderman about various components, including the condition of tires and servicing history, including transmission fluid and other critical mechanical aspects, indicating a thorough buyer interest.
Negative: Concerns were voiced by commenters regarding the truck’s pricing, with @JK-L78 comparing the current market value to its original price and questioning the increased demand and valuation of trucks. @brushymtnjohn and others expressed the need for confirmation about the truck's transmission shifts and prior service, indicating uncertainty about maintenance. Overall, while the seller provided sufficient responses to inquiries, the comments reflect a mix of skepticism about pricing and thoroughness of the vehicle's service history.
|
 |
Positive: @Ascot1970 (The Seller) welcomes potential buyers to his sale, emphasizing the rarity of the Yamaha model which was produced for only two years. He shares his fondness for the bike, having been an old flat-track racer, and expresses a desire for the bike to find a good home. @113RaiderRider recalls his positive memories of owning a similar bike, which he loved riding, and wishes the seller good luck with the sale. @88m53453 also shares a nostalgic experience, having owned the 250 version and expressing appreciation for the bike's aesthetics.
Neutral: @Ascot1970 (The Seller) clarifies that the bike's lights are non-functional, meant only for street riding in Arizona, and indicates that they can be powered by adding a 12v coil to the stator. He engages with various commenters, providing additional information about his collection, including that the other bikes are not for sale. @projectstw raises questions about the bike's ignition and maintenance history, indicating a vested interest in its operational condition, while @Labman62 asks for more details on the Yamaha Service News related to the bike's ignition.
Negative: @projectstw shares a negative experience, recalling a near-accident with a similar motorcycle due to ignition issues, indicating concerns about the bike's reliability. He expresses a conflicted desire for the motorcycle, admitting an initial loathing for it but ultimately wanting to own it. This reflects a negative sentiment towards the potential risks associated with the bike while also recognizing its appeal. @sprinkman, mildly disappointed by the unavailability of other bikes in @Ascot1970's collection, further expresses a longing for rare models that may never come up for sale.
|
 |
Positive: @nvanmali95 expresses satisfaction with their recent acquisition of a Jade vehicle while noting that the diamond white option is also appealing. @gscharnagl appreciates the combination of low mileage and great specifications on the w221, complimenting the tan interior for its excellent condition even though they personally prefer designo interiors. @SiSL2 reminisces fondly about owning a similar vehicle and declares their intent to keep an eye on this particular listing.
Neutral: @DukeDog1 inquires about the vehicle's maintenance history, specifically requesting the Vehicle Maintenance Information (VMI) to understand what services have been conducted between 2018 and 2026. The seller, @genevamotorcars, responds positively to these requests, indicating that they have reached out for the VMI and will provide updates. @Tcstraker seeks clarification on whether the vehicle includes Bluetooth and satellite radio features, to which @genevamotorcars confirms their availability and shares a road test video.
Negative: @DukeDog1 expresses concern about the tire condition, asking for details about the age and replacement status of the tires, as no information was available in the Carfax report. @georgepehanick succinctly remarks that new tires will be necessary soon, signifying that while this is not a significant issue, it is nonetheless a consideration for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @knucklesbusted (The Seller) has stated that the Mustang is a solid, low mileage vehicle that exceeded expectations upon arrival. It functions well and handles nicely at highway speeds. The Seller also mentioned that the original AM radio works great, and all the lights are functioning, making it a reliable choice for potential buyers. Buyers have expressed interest in seeing the car and seem impressed with its condition despite acknowledging it is not a high-performance model.
Neutral: The Seller clarified the concerns raised by potential buyers, addressing various questions regarding the car’s condition. He provided reassurance about the minor leaks, stating it's a slow leak with no significant drop in oil levels. The car has been resprayed a couple of times and possesses some surface rust but no serious corrosion. Furthermore, the Seller has made adjustments to help potential bidders understand the current state of the vehicle and remains open to inspections by independent mechanics.
Negative: There were some concerns raised regarding the car's features, such as the automatic transmission and the lack of power steering, which some buyers seem to find less appealing. Additionally, there were observations about minor cosmetic imperfections such as mismatched paint and small rust bubbles noted near the rear quarter panel, indicating that while the car has charm, it may not be in perfect condition. Some potential buyers have expressed curiosity about the specifics of these issues, and there was also a request for undercarriage pictures to assess its overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Euro_Classica (The Seller) provided extensive videos including a cold start and a roof operation, showing the vehicle's features. Several users complimented the unique specifications of the car, particularly its rare combination with PCCB brakes, sparking interest among potential buyers. @Euro_Classica emphasized that this car is incredibly well-optioned and considered a 'unicorn' by some, highlighting its special and unique attributes.
Neutral: @davidduccio expressed curiosity about the rarity of the non-Turbo 997.1 cabriolet, while @nolanick inquired about the status of the IMS bearing, a common concern with these engines. User @Alexanderl raised questions about the maintenance history, particularly regarding oil sampling and brake rotors, seeking more information about the overall condition of these components.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the expensive nature of PCCB brakes, with @SteVinHow and @NicLaughlin discussing the potential high costs associated with their replacement. @911outlaw_ noted that while the PCCB brakes are cool, they can become a financial burden if the car accumulates high mileage. @Craig66 questioned whether steel replacements are feasible if PCCBs are not maintained, reflecting uncertainty about future maintenance costs.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and condition. @JLsKA510 called it a "beautiful example," while @JOHNNIEd appreciated the car's design and requested a video showcasing its performance. The seller (@hille) shared a video of the car shifting through gears, enhancing the vehicle's allure. Additionally, @NaturopathicDoctor commended the seller for their honest representation, pointing out previously undisclosed details like surface corrosion. @irollerdude noted that the car handles well with its modifications and receives positive attention wherever it goes. @SHEARERFAMILY shared their personal experience meeting the seller, expressing admiration for both the car and the seller's character, and noted how the vehicle looks even better in person.
Neutral: Several comments mentioned technical aspects of the vehicle and its history. @Gm8351 inquired about the electric power steering kit used in the conversion, while @87033x6 pointed out a discrepancy in the tire specifications. The seller clarified that the power steering was installed by the previous owner (@irollerdude), and acknowledged the tire confusion, admitting it was a simple oversight. There was also some back-and-forth regarding the car's color, with commenters seeking clarification about whether it was originally Cypress Green or a darker shade. @JWHBOOMER shared insights from their own experience with Volvo paint codes, while @irollerdude and @MinutemanMike contributed to the color discussion, reinforcing the community's expertise.
Negative: Not all comments were entirely favorable, as there were concerns raised about some vehicle features. @87033x6 highlighted potential issues with the heater control valve, which the seller later addressed by explaining their modifications for better heat management in Texas. Furthermore, @RioMimbres asked about the air conditioning's efficiency in extreme heat, prompting the seller to admit that the AC struggles to keep up but extends the driving season. This criticism reflects a common concern among vintage car owners regarding the vehicles' capabilities in modern conditions, particularly in hotter climates. Despite these critiques, the overall consensus remained positive about the vehicle's aesthetics and the seller's transparency.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a beast and a gorgeous build. @r6erik called it a "beast!" while @cruisewoodward referred to it simply as a "bad boy!" @Uptimesvc praised its aesthetics and build quality, while @15PALS highlighted how it embodies the sinister look of classic Black Cudas combined with modern performance. @Mopar to ya! enthusiastically acknowledged it as a cool car, and @Wolfenhaus echoed similar sentiments by noting how good it looks. Furthermore, @Breezejammer remarked on the striking reflection in the paint, adding to the overall appreciation of its visual appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @ralumbaugh, shared insights about the car's history and his passion for classic muscle cars. He communicated that he had owned the vehicle for approximately 2.5 years, after owning multiple muscle cars, and noted that while he is parting ways with it to create garage space, he loved every moment spent with it. @Aeromonte provided additional context, stating he played a role in the car's build and noted the use of high-quality parts during its construction. The car features notable characteristics such as an impressive Hellcat engine and driving experience reminiscent of a classic Cuda, but with modern handling.
Negative: Despite the positive descriptions, some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's condition and specific details. @sssalesinc criticized the choice of transmission and the satin hood, feeling it detracted from the overall look and quality of the build. @MarkFisher and @Mtnjunkie1217 commented on the visible scratches and imperfections in the paintwork, questioning how well the car had been maintained. @ralumbaugh (The Seller) responded by addressing the paint concerns, asserting that the car was well-maintained and explaining that the imperfections were due to handling during photography, hoping to reassure potential buyers of its actual condition.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received several compliments for its stunning features and aesthetic appeal. @Daq7827 noted the rarity of Turbo S models on the East Coast, hinting at its desirability. @sushisean praised the car's beautiful specification, specifically inquiring about the appealing Dark Blue Metallic color, which @Robbyracer confirmed. @dave292 expressed admiration, comparing it to his own car of the same exterior color, which indicates a strong appreciation for the quality and design of this Porsche. Additionally, there is excitement around the auction as @Brutaltruth found the bidding process particularly amusing, highlighting the active interest from potential buyers.
Neutral: The comments also contain a mix of inquiries and logistical discussions from interested bidders, indicating some engagement with the auction. @SofiaLeo posed questions about the paint's originality and any imperfections, the answers revealing that the car has been well-maintained with some repainted components. Inquiries about the car's specifications have also been made, such as @LawDog asking for a build sheet and @MTS1 needing clarification regarding whether it is a Turbo or Turbo S, which @Robbyracer promptly addressed. The seller has provided a wealth of information about the car's condition, include details about the paint and interior, which some commenters found helpful.
Negative: Not everyone seemed impressed by the auction; @CamDaddy623 dismissed the bidding activity as trivial, questioning the motives behind the numerous bids. Concerns were raised about the focus on minor details such as the suggestion of yellow seatbelts by @59turner, which @80-Topdown defended by suggesting that they would detract from the beautiful interior. Overall, while the vehicle has its admirers, some comments demonstrate a degree of skepticism or criticism surrounding the auction process and specific aesthetic choices.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its impressive features and unique charm. @MichaelB (The Seller) describes the chopped top Merc as a wild ride filled with exciting custom modifications like a big block engine, custom paint, and a host of nostalgic accessories that capture the essence of the 1950s. @billyblyth, @Mercury88, and @Tomas2829 express admiration for the car's hot rod royalty status and aesthetic appeal, praising its vintage style and Ford power. Overall, many commenters seem to share a nostalgic appreciation for the car, reminiscing about the 50s and the fun it evokes.
Neutral: Some comments raise practical questions and considerations about the vehicle's specifications and features. @Tryon and @50merc seek clarity about the car's operational aspects, including the functionality of the lake pipes and details about the chassis and suspension setup. @MikeFiftyNine and @danbenck inquire about mounting and details regarding the frame, expressing a desire for more technical information to make a more informed bidding decision. These neutral comments reflect a mix of curiosity and caution regarding the car's features, indicating a balance between appreciation and the need for more clarity.
Negative: Conversely, there are several critical remarks regarding the vehicle and the seller's responses. @2caddiesandaMach1 and @50merc voice skepticism about the seller's transparency, questioning the quality of the modifications and the authenticity of the hot rod lineage. Some commenters are concerned about the lack of specific information about the chassis and frame, suggesting that the seller is dodging questions. @Valiantjim notes the absence of substantial technical details and suggests that the listing comes off as more of a spectacle than an informative assessment. These negative sentiments indicate frustration with both the quality of the custom work and the seller's interaction with potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Discobob mentioned that their sister owned a yellow version of this vehicle and found it to be a fun and peppy ride, wishing good luck to potential buyers. @EdmontonCarGuy also highlighted the car's aesthetic appeal, stating that he believes it looks far better than the Solstice while also being surprisingly roomy, even for taller drivers. @elecktronika echoed this sentiment regarding the vehicle's looks, expressing an appreciation for its design over the Solstice.
Neutral: @bbuyack expressed his positive feelings about seeing the vehicle in Arizona but raised a question regarding the underbody rust situation due to its previous life in Michigan and Wisconsin. @JB7890 (The Seller) responded by clarifying that the car was always garaged during its time in those states and only driven on nice summer days, addressing concerns about potential rust. Furthermore, @ScorchRed provided informative input that while there is no dedicated boost gauge, boost can be monitored via a digital dash readout, and @JB7890 (The Seller) shared additional content, including pictures and a driving video.
Negative: @elecktronika raised a concern about the lack of a comprehensive gauge package in the car, noting that it only comes with essential indicators like a speedometer and tachometer, which feels inadequate for a performance vehicle. This commenter felt that the gauge package was reminiscent of GM's lesser quality interiors from the early 2000s, which is unbefitting for a sports car released in 2008. Additionally, @bradwildridge asked if the center console's concealed drink holder was operable, showing skepticism about the vehicle's practicality.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's outstanding features and excellent presentation. @laf452 calls the Alpina B7 very nice, indicating a strong appreciation for its aesthetics and quality. @amrik555 shares a positive experience during his visit, noting that the paintwork is in very good condition and the interior is clean, also praising the spacious backseat. Additionally, @klaypool7, who owned a similar model, mentions that he fit perfectly in the short wheelbase version, further emphasizing the vehicle's comfort and desirability. @clean_machina contributes by suggesting that any seating issues may be due to improper seat adjustment, indicating confidence in the vehicle's design for taller drivers.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a balanced view of the vehicle and the selling process. @Collectibleclassics provides information about their operations, emphasizing their commitment to transparency and customer satisfaction while detailing their services and the car inspection process. @Nathaniel888 raises technical questions regarding the iDrive system, demonstrating interest in specific functionalities of the vehicle. @bracquis inquires about undercarriage pictures and brake readings, indicating a desire for more detailed information to better assess the condition of the car without expressing any strong opinions either way.
Negative: There are some concerns raised about the suitability of the driver's seat for taller individuals. @amrik555 shares that he struggled to fit comfortably in the driver's seat despite it being a long wheelbase model, prompting discussions about potential issues with the seat adjustment. @MayorRansom counters this experience by stating that he, at 6'3", has not encountered similar issues, suggesting a discrepancy that may need clarification. Furthermore, @OldDominionB raises the possibility of an obstruction affecting the seat's range of motion, hinting that the problem might not lie with the vehicle itself. These mixed accounts create an opportunity for further dialogue around the vehicle's accessibility and comfort for various driver heights.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments express appreciation for the car's rich history and celebrity ownership, particularly noting that it formerly belonged to the iconic actor @JackLemmon. @Fleche_dOr highlighted its three-owner status and how even a 'needy' E-Type is worth saving, while @PaulEZ pointed out its potential as a project car for someone willing to put in the effort. @155LEN (The Seller) acknowledged the appeal of Mr. Lemmon's ownership, suggesting a sense of greatness connected to the car that resonates with its potential buyers.
Neutral: Comments varied in perspective about the car's condition and driving experience. @Drumond mentioned a few mechanical concerns and viewed it as a project car, while @BloodyHell found the concept of Lemmon driving a 2+2 E-Type fitting. @wapsirat expressed surprise at Lemmon owning the vehicle, suggesting a disconnect between the actor's persona and the car's image. The seller acknowledged these points, insisting that the car still runs well despite its issues and noting it has been carefully maintained over the years.
Negative: Some comments pointed to significant concerns regarding the car's condition, with @artreality questioning the functionality of the dashboard instruments beyond the lights and tachometer. @Drumond was skeptical about investing in a vehicle with performance issues like backfiring due to lean carburetors, and @CarFoolLane criticized the omission of important cinematic references in the description. Overall, both potential bidders and casual commenters raised practical concerns about the car that could deter buyers unless properly addressed.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Ferrari F430 Spider, noting its stunning appearance and high-quality features. @alfriedesq praised both the seller and the vehicle, emphasizing it as a wonderful machine. @ANGLES highlighted that the car is in practically brand-new condition, and several remarks indicated that it has the potential to do well in the auction. Additionally, @urs6e24 mentioned the increasing values of similar models, asserting that the F430 is among the last naturally aspirated Ferraris, making it a desirable candidate for investment.
Neutral: There was a constructive dialog regarding the vehicle's specifics, such as the exhaust system and carbon fiber components. @Leiniesbuddy questioned whether the common manifold issue had been addressed, to which @SoldBySinger confirmed that a Tubi muffler was installed, enhancing the car's sound. @mike_747 and @rlarsen462 engaged in discussions about the manifolds, with insights shared about the differences in models and repair options. The seller upheld transparency, sharing details of service documents and inspection reports, indicating a well-maintained car.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about potential issues with the F430, particularly the exhaust manifolds, which are known for vulnerability to cracking. @Wsby pointed out that neglecting this issue could lead to severe engine problems. Although most discussions around the car were positive, @robauto noted visible smoke during a video startup, raising alarm for some about what might be a minor issue or something more serious. The sentiment indicated a cautious but fair view regarding the car's overall quality, underscoring the need for due diligence in pre-purchase inspections.
|
 |
Positive: @r6erik praised the vehicle as an "Awesome little low mileage Mister 2!" indicating enthusiasm for its condition. Many others, such as @Spider_Mike, echoed similar sentiments, reminiscing about their own experiences with these cars, highlighting the superb handling and enjoyment they bring. @Dk91364 shared his high regard for the MR2 Spyder, stating that it needs nothing apart from the provided photos and expressing a sentiment of eagerness to buy based on its condition alone. @Big_greasy_taco recalled owning a similar model and deemed it a stellar machine, emphasizing the positive reputation these vehicles hold.
Neutral: The seller, @MBHAuto, provided thorough information about the car's history and condition, citing that it was garage-kept and underwent extensive maintenance, including replacing the fuel pump and cleaning the fuel tank. They also addressed inquiries regarding the original window sticker and driving videos, clarifying that a driving video will not be posted due to concerns about potential damage. Others responded to @MBHAuto's comments with personal inquiries about viewing the car and awaited further details regarding its mileage and features. Specifically, @cshowe and others expressed interest in fitment for taller drivers, discussing their own experiences with similar vehicles, like the Miata.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism about the seller's decision not to provide a driving video. @Eric88 criticized this approach as overly cautious, asserting that it felt excessive, while @Jtpryan echoed similar doubts about the evasiveness of the seller's reasons. @Ocoanater raised a query about the paint consistency, indicating a concern regarding potential repainting. While the seller maintained that the paint was 100% original, such questions highlight some issues potential buyers have regarding the car's authenticity and condition. Additionally, @InHisImage84 noted a small scratch in the paint, which, although minor, contributed to slight concerns regarding the vehicle's overall aesthetic status.
|
2023 Ford F-150 Raptor R SuperCrew Hennessey VelociRaptor 1000 6×6
1FTFW1RJ2PFA88714
Lot 235209
Dealer
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle's impressive specifications, describing it as a 'magnificent monster' that is 'super rare' and 'cool AF'. Many highlight its uniqueness, particularly as a one-of-a-kind build by Hennessey, labeling it a 'UNICORN' that is ideal for collectors. Additional praise is directed toward aesthetics, such as the 'nice touch' of the steering wheel stripe, which is considered helpful for performance driving. There are also mentions of fun parking experiences and the vehicle's overall imposing presence, calling it a true 'behemoth'.
Neutral: Several comments inquire about practical features such as fuel tank size, load capacity, and build certifications. The seller, @911r, provides details about the fuel tank capacity and notes that no additional documentation was provided for frame modifications by Hennessey. There are discussions regarding build cost variations, with different users providing estimates on the price of similar models in the market, reflecting a range of opinions on value and availability.
Negative: Critiques center around the vehicle's size, with some commenters questioning its practicality and calling it 'too small' or unsuitable for more average users. Others comment on the high operating costs, including fuel consumption, and express concern that without certification papers, the vehicle's modifications may not meet regulations. Some comments were also perceived as non-constructive, which indicates a level of disagreement among users regarding the vehicle's utility versus its extravagant design.
|
Six-Decades-Family-Owned, 350-Powered 1934 Ford Model 40 Cabriolet Street Rod
18594671
Lot 235210
Private Party
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong admiration for the 1934 Ford Cabriolet, with many users praising its beauty and craftsmanship. @loggdon remarked on its excellent construction, calling it an 'Extremely nice, all Henry steel Cabriolet.' @RBailey57 and @zues56 echoed these sentiments, labeling the vehicle as 'drop dead gorgeous' and complimenting the father's great taste, respectively. Comments from @pasorodder and @shelbysteve highlighted the timeless design of the car, appreciating its aesthetic even if it was built several decades ago. The seller, @beckseuropean, reinforced this by mentioning that despite its age, the car is a well-sorted piece that has been cherished, stating that it deserves to be with someone who will truly appreciate it.
Neutral: Several commenters acknowledged the car's history and the emotional weight of selling it. @beckseuropean shared that selling the Cabriolet brings mixed emotions as it was a significant part of their father's life. @Tiger66 noted the remarkable achievement of maintaining a vehicle that is nearing 100 years old, while @mike_rockwell pointed out that its build, though older, retains a desirable quality due to meticulous craftsmanship. Commenters like @CaptainCLB expressed a nostalgic longing for such cars and hinted at their own modifications, showing how the Cabriolet resonates with those who cherish classic vehicles.
Negative: While most comments were positive or neutral, there were a few critical notes regarding the car's older build. @1Raven pointed out that while the vehicle is beautiful, its construction is 35 years old, making it less appealing to some collectors who prefer modern builds. The seller, @beckseuropean, responded by acknowledging the concern but emphasized the quality of the build. Additionally, a note from @42Lincolnguy questioned the visibility of the VIN number on the title, indicating a potential issue that could concern buyers regarding authenticity or registration.
|
 |
Positive: Overall, the comments highlight the classic appeal of the 1968 Mustang being sold by @BluDog71. Commenters like @PeachStateClassics praised the car's good looks and relatively original condition, suggesting the inclusion of a Marti Report to verify its authenticity. @FrankCatso echoed the sentiment that someone would get a great deal, indicating a positive outlook on the auction's outcome and the vehicle's desirability. Additionally, @Hoppy18 offered a helpful suggestion that the seller deliver the car to the nearest US city to ease any concerns potential bidders may have regarding purchasing a car from Canada.
Neutral: Several comments addressed the logistical aspects and necessary considerations for potential buyers without expressing strong opinions on the vehicle itself. @eiffergan inquired about the hassle involved in bringing the car to the US, while @MarcPoin raised a question regarding the registration costs for a Canadian car in California. @BluDog71 (The Seller) provided detailed responses to these inquiries, mentioning both the straightforward process of importation and registration fees, which tends to range between $200 and $500, as classic cars often have exemptions. The inquiries show an interest in the practicalities surrounding the sale, indicating a need for clarity for potential buyers rather than outright endorsements or critiques of the vehicle.
Negative: On the negative side, concerns were raised about certain aspects of the vehicle, particularly regarding its steering and braking systems. @turnerbat asked if the car had power steering and brakes, to which @BluDog71 responded that it does not, though he assured that the steering is quite good in its current state. This lack of power features might deter some potential bidders who prefer more modern conveniences. Additionally, @sdippert expressed regret about having to retract his bid after purchasing another Mustang, highlighting a common scenario in auctions where bidders navigate options and commitments, lending a sense of unpredictability to the bidding process.
|
 |
Positive: @blackonblack911 praises Vandoit for making nice vans suited for active lifestyles like biking and skiing. @jtws2018 expresses enthusiasm by stating that the van is 'sick'. @HIride appreciates Vandoit's reputation for beneficial adventure van builds and notes their continuous evolution of design, alongside the comfort of having rear heating and AC when driving. The seller, @RCSkiBum, adds to the positivity by highlighting the van's reconfigurability based on specific trip needs and expresses their satisfaction with the rig they purchased.
Neutral: Several users seek additional information about the vehicle, such as @cschauerj who inquires about oil changes noted on the Carfax and requests insights into the electrical system. @svatem asks for towing capacity and the overall length of the van, indicating interest but not necessarily criticism. @elburts has questions about the floor-to-ceiling height, the presence of damage or rust seen in pictures, and the tire tread depth, showing an analytical approach rather than an emotional response.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns, like @cschauerj noting the significant gaps in the service history and @elburts pointing out what may appear to be damage or rust, requesting clarity on those issues. @JWFaire mentions a potential crack in the exhaust system, signaling worry about the undercarriage's integrity. Overall, while there are inquiries for details about the vehicle's condition, there's a tendency towards constructive questioning rather than overt negativity.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the classic Mercedes-Benz SL 450 as a desirable vehicle. @VintageDuck describes it as having timeless styling, smooth V8 power, and a quality feel that provides a vintage luxury experience. Commenters express excitement about the car's performance and vintage appeal, with @Tommy69 acknowledging that the car runs and drives well, describing it as a 'vintage dream.' Additionally, @Iromanosky inquires about the climate control, to which @VintageDuck confirms that all systems are functioning well, including the AC, which adds to the car's overall appeal.
Neutral: The comments reveal a practical approach to potential purchase, with users asking straightforward questions about the vehicle's condition and features. @Burakinci asks about the policy for U.S. purchasers, while @Tommy69 queries about service records and mechanical issues, indicating there are no known problems and the car runs smoothly. Other practical considerations include the operational state of the climate control system, with @Joe1637 inquiring about the fuel gauge and high-speed performance, to which @VintageDuck responds affirmatively.
Negative: While the overall impression is largely positive, a few concerns are addressed. @Tommy69 notes the absence of service records, which might be a red flag for some buyers. @mgxk inquires about the removable hardtop's stand, only to find out that it does not come with one, potentially disappointing those looking for complete accessories. While @VintageDuck assures potential buyers of the vehicle's functionality, the lack of a stand and service history could raise doubts about the vehicle's comprehensive care and storage.
|
Randall Wallace’s Supercharged 2015 Ford F-150 Crew Cab Lariat 4×4
1FTEW1EFXFKD48652
Lot 235097
Private Party
 |
Positive: Comments show a strong appreciation for the vehicle's unique features and its connection to the movie Braveheart. @vwbussed expressed excitement over the license plate, and @BostonCarGuy praised the truck as a 'unique tribute'. Conversations demonstrate the interesting backstory of the vehicle, specifically its design inspiration from the movie, with @BraveheartRW sharing that he wanted to create something he thought was cool and resonates with others. The seller has been transparent about the vehicle's service history, including details that help assure potential buyers about the maintenance and reliability of the truck.
Neutral: Multiple commentators discussed the vehicle's technical aspects, such as the oil change history and recent services, with @WIZZZZ asking for confirmations on various maintenance records and potential issues like the sunroof. @BraveheartRW provided comprehensive details about the oil changes, extending into further service records, and explained the reasons behind the vehicle's inability to run on E85 due to the Whipple Supercharger setup. This indicates a shared interest in understanding the truck's performance capabilities alongside its aesthetic value.
Negative: Some comments hinted at potential concerns or misconceptions about the vehicle. @WIZZZZ's inquiries indicate unease about the condition of certain mechanical aspects, such as oil consumption and any possible leakages, which could suggest buyers might have reservations without assurance. While @TigerM's comment was flagged as non-constructive, it draws attention to how reactions can vary on attributes like personal license plates being part of the sale, reflecting misunderstandings among buyers. Additionally, @Stawn raised a question about why the truck can no longer run on E85, hinting at a concern for optimal fuel usage.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors have positively noted the car's overall appeal and features. @revracer expressed a genuine liking for the vehicle, particularly appreciating practical features such as a slot to plug in a radar detector. @RodsHotRod mentioned the 17" wheels, noting that they provide better tire options and enhance the car's appearance, contributing to its attraction and popularity on the road. @NYCarGuy (The Seller) acknowledged the appeal, emphasizing the aesthetic beauty of Cobras and the attention the car draws, reinforcing its status as a head-turner.
Neutral: Several neutral inquiries focused on specific vehicle features and specifications. @mikes2018 asked for clarification on the horsepower measurement, which was addressed by @reycuda, who provided details regarding the motor and indicated the corrected horsepower figure. @Djwhitman questioned if a sliding seat track was added for taller drivers, to which @NYCarGuy (The Seller) responded about adapting the seat to provide a comfortable driving experience for someone of his height. Questions about the car's emissions status and operation of the turn signals were also posed, with @NYCarGuy (The Seller) providing satisfactory answers regarding inspections and functionality.
Negative: Some concerns were raised that suggested potential issues or uncertainties about the vehicle. @SvenskiNM pointed out what appeared to be a misalignment in the rear wheel's placement, although this was later clarified by @NYCarGuy (The Seller) as simply a photographic angle. Additionally, @rastess inquired about the method of operation for the turn signals and the nature of the stripes on the vehicle, reflecting a need for clarity on these aspects. This points to a possible lack of detailed information about vehicle specifications that could be addressed.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments reflect a positive sentiment toward the GMC Sierra being sold, particularly from @Rnieters (The Seller), who highlights the vehicle's cleanliness and unique color combination, emphasizing that it is hard to find a truck with both blue interior and this specific color. @Rnieters also expresses gratitude for the bids and comments, indicating a welcoming atmosphere for potential buyers. There is excitement generated around the auction since it is selling at no reserve, encouraging bids without hesitation.
Neutral: @generalblack87 raises a neutral request for additional well-lit photos of the undercarriage, signaling that potential buyers are interested in seeing more details before finalizing their bids. @Yerkey89's comment hints at a desire for comprehensive visuals, as he states, "In short, everything. More the better sir," which reflects an interest in thorough transparency regarding the vehicle's condition. @Rnieters responds positively to these inquiries and suggests options for interested buyers to see the truck in person or to request more images, creating an open line of communication.
Negative: No negative comments were noted in the review of the vehicle, as all comments provided were generally supportive or inquisitive, with no complaints or concerns raised about the GMC Sierra. Even requests for additional details were made in a constructive manner, underlining a largely positive sentiment among potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlight the excitement around the vehicle, particularly noting its low mileage and the seller's enthusiasm. @FrostysAutos, the seller, expresses eagerness to engage with the community and provide detailed information about the Tahoe. Commenters like @Tigers196884 positively remark on the vehicle's underrated status and the appeal of its two-tone interiors, suggesting that, despite some concerns about the wheels, this model holds a lot of potential.
Neutral: The seller has taken the time to address several inquiries from potential buyers, showing a commitment to transparency. @hunterfisher asks about the original rims, which @FrostysAutos confirms are not available. There are discussions about the vehicle's features, such as the AFM system and the tire pressure light issue being linked to the oversize tires. The seller also provides updates regarding uploaded videos showcasing the vehicle, contributing to a more thorough understanding of its condition.
Negative: Concerns are raised around the vehicle in a few comments, notably by @DoubleK93 who asks about possible recalls and oil consumption issues. The seller acknowledges a non-functioning rear windshield wiper but reassures that no significant issues have been encountered during their ownership. There's some unease regarding the electronics shown in the videos, as @TeamSled queries if the blinking lights are indicative of a problem; @FrostysAutos clarifies that these are merely an effect of the video recording.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlight the vehicle's exceptional condition and authenticity. @Love4x4 praised the great appearance of the underside, noting it has clearly never been driven in salt and appreciated the original wheels, which are often replaced. @GulfStreamMotorCars expressed enthusiasm about the rarity of finding a well-maintained Dodge Stealth R/T Turbo, suggesting that it's a desirable model in great shape. The seller, @powertechselect, also showcased their passion for the car, detailing the efforts made to prepare it for sale, including new tires and comprehensive maintenance, which enhances its appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @powertechselect, provided responses to multiple queries regarding the car's history and specifications, such as confirming that the clutch has not been replaced (@Marty311) and the timing belt had indeed been changed (@matpatte). The seller also clarified details about the car's aftermarket items, mentioning the Magnaflow muffler and the modifications to the exhaust (@Mg78). Concerns raised about paint overspray from a previous respray were addressed, clarifying the touch-up paint situation and providing details on how the vehicle's previous ownership affected its current look (@Farrahsdad).
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns over the vehicle's condition and modifications. @FX3_4 questioned the disconnection of the selectable drive mode functionality, which was attributed to a broken wire, leaving the reason for this unresolved issue somewhat concerning. Additionally, @matpatte inquired about the selectable 2-mode exhaust function, only to find out from @powertechselect that it does not operate because the aftermarket exhaust lacks that capability. These issues may lead potential buyers to question the car's overall performance and reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many users expressed excitement about the vehicle, highlighting its potential for fun and adventure. @mynameistimo exclaimed 'Hell yeah!' and @68VW called it 'BADA$ !!', while @PMB-BTR noted it looks like an 'absolute blast to drive' and described it as 'Flipping sweet!' Other commenters like @mick59 and @milage appreciated the robust build quality and mentioned it as a 'mean machine' that is well-suited for off-roading, signifying a strong overall impression of excitement regarding its performance and aesthetics.
Neutral: Several users sought more technical information about the vehicle. @scoobysouth inquired about the long travel suspension and steering specifications, showcasing an interest in its off-road capabilities. @pforfun (The Seller) answered these questions by explaining the shocks' specifications and advised on vehicle alignment if driven on pavement. Additionally, inquiries about videos demonstrating the vehicle's performance were raised by @CallumStorey and @r32fan, suggesting a need for more visual evidence of its capabilities.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's usability for long-distance travel. @Hrgkmg questioned its ability to cruise at 65 mph, and @pforfun (The Seller) noted that while it could sustain that speed, it would not be advisable for long periods. Furthermore, @JosephDAZ asked for re-gearing estimates, demonstrating potential apprehensions about using the vehicle on the road primarily. Lastly, @mirolu brought up space concerns for taller drivers, indicating that while the previous owner was over 6 feet tall, comfort might vary for those of similar height.
|
 |
Positive: @V8Q highlights that these cars are great drivers, implying a strong positive driving experience. @MBClassik (The Seller) reinforces this sentiment by expressing that the RS5 offers a perfect blend of performance and luxury, and mentions that the vehicle has been well-cared for and maintained with high-quality products. Furthermore, @WsmataU shares his enthusiasm for the car, asserting it is the most fun sports car under $40k, thereby affirming the vehicle's desirability and performance.
Neutral: Several comments raise questions about the vehicle's maintenance history and reliability. @HikerBob inquires about the frequency of oil changes and brake rotor replacements, while @Bloom135 asks about potential carbon buildup or oil leaks. @MBClassik (The Seller) responds to these concerns by reassuring potential buyers that there are no oil leaks or build-up, emphasizing the reliability of the car and its German engineering. Additionally, @Joe34 questions the long-term cost of ownership, which invites a discussion about the upkeep of the vehicle as it ages.
Negative: There is a slight undertone of concern regarding the ownership costs in the future, as expressed by @Joe34 who is interested in the cost implications of maintaining the vehicle between 100-150K miles. His question highlights a potential worry for future buyers about the feasibility of keeping the car as a daily driver over time. @WsmataU’s mention of his own experience with deferred maintenance could imply that prospective owners should be cautious about the costs associated with older models.
|
 |
Positive: @mikeeby shares fond memories of a similar car he owned, emphasizing the nostalgic value of having 8 tracks still in the glove box. @111 (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm for his 1978 Corvette 25th Anniversary, describing it as a great driver with a desirable combination of the L82 engine and 4-speed manual transmission. He notes that the car receives a lot of positive attention and assures prospective buyers that it is currently in solid driving condition after a successful 60-mile drive.
Neutral: In discussions about the car's features, @WillieCarGuy raises a question regarding the mileage, speculating that it might be around 126,000 miles or more. @Offramp94 provides insights on the steering wheel’s origin, identifying it as a 'Vega' wheel that was used in models without tilt/tele, while @bringatrailer acknowledges the clarification and updates the listing accordingly. @horuhe00 requests additional photos of the dash, and @111 (The Seller) confirms that these will be added soon, along with updates on the condition of specific features like the air conditioning.
Negative: @Hardly_Davidson critiques the choice of the Vega steering wheel, questioning the decision-making of GM engineers behind that design, suggesting it was a poor decision to include it in a Corvette. @makin69 inquires about the function of the air conditioning, hinting at possible concerns regarding its effectiveness, and reminds others about the uninstalled carpet kit that was previously included in the auction discussion. Additionally, @111 (The Seller) notes some imperfections like a crack in the dashboard, which could be seen as a downside for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @baysfull praised the build quality of the vehicle, highlighting the quality of the interior and the craftsmanship involved in personal touches like chopping and shaving handles. @CKKurtz expressed admiration for the Studebaker Champion Starlight Coupe, calling it spectacular, and @NorCalBert referred to it as a clean, elegant, and powerful custom bodied Grand Tourer. Collectively, these comments suggest that the vehicle has garnered attention for its aesthetics and unique modifications, appealing to enthusiasts in the community.
Neutral: Several commenters have asked for further information about the vehicle, including @pronto1952 who inquired about the emergency door openers and engine specifications, and @Waynzo who wanted to know the completion date of the build and details about the engine's history. @Frutzer, the seller, responded to these inquiries, confirming the presence of emergency door openers and providing details about the engine being from a wrecked 1970 Camaro. Moreover, concerns about the authenticity of the vehicle’s title and VIN were raised by @1956President and @jcole, indicating that while the vehicle is interesting, there are crucial details that potential buyers need to be aware of.
Negative: @1956President pointed out inaccuracies regarding the vehicle's title and model year, claiming it cannot be registered in Arizona due to the discrepancy. @bulletnozeguy echoed this sentiment, sharing personal experience with similar title issues in California, suggesting that such problems could pose future complications for the buyer. Additionally, @ettev15z expressed concerns about the potential issues with the serial number and VIN, indicating that these discrepancies could lead to challenges when reselling the vehicle in the future.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is presented as a highly desirable 2016 Aston Martin Vantage GTS Roadster, highlighted by its rarity as one of only 39 GTS Roadsters produced that year, and boasting a fresh service along with a new set of Bridgestone tires. @GulfStreamMotorCars emphasizes the car's exceptional condition, having undergone inspection by a top exotic car service facility. Additionally, @ripper996 and @Roberto_SFO express admiration for the GTS's updated interior and overall aesthetic, while acknowledging its unique features that distinguish it from other models.
Neutral: There are several inquiries seeking clarification on the vehicle's history and condition, including questions from @dms10514 and @AlextheCatGroomerllc about service records, the original battery status, and the presence of the owner’s manual. @GulfStreamMotorCars responds with transparency, confirming some details such as the absence of the service manual and the ownership history, while also committing to providing additional information, including a video of the convertible top operation, as requested by @Pinochle27.
Negative: Some comments indicate a lack of certain documentation and accessories, creating minor uncertainties among potential buyers. @dms10514 and @AlextheCatGroomerllc express concerns over the missing owner’s manual and wind deflector, and the potential replacement of the battery is also noted as a point of interest. Although @GulfStreamMotorCars assures that the vehicle is in great condition and has undergone proper servicing, some comments reflect a desire for more comprehensive documentation and assurance regarding the car's provenance.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has been well maintained and is in excellent condition, as confirmed by both @Berdine (The Seller) and the dealership where it was serviced. @Berdine highlights that the BMW was garaged and hand washed continuously, ensuring the paint and finish remain as new without any dings or major imperfections. The seller assures potential buyers that the car has had recent inspections with all aspects passing with flying colors, and they even provided information about a refinishing job that was done on the rear bumper, giving insights into care taken on the vehicle.
Neutral: @Berdine (The Seller) provides several practical details regarding the vehicle's features and upkeep, including the current state of the tires and notes about minor clear coat scratches rather than any significant dents. The seller has made efforts to clarify questions raised by potential buyers, such as the cargo cover's inclusion and the condition of various components. The records show regular oil changes and other maintenance by the dealer, but there is a suggestion for buyers to review all service records for additional maintenance confirmations.
Negative: Concerns have been raised by @Rambo_Lambo regarding the vehicle's history, particularly about a replaced control arm that could indicate prior severe impacts. These potential issues prompt inquiries about whether the BMW has any accident or collision history, highlighting a level of uncertainty among potential buyers about the vehicle's overall integrity. Additionally, @Piston expresses concerns regarding the visible condition of the charger, suggesting a need for repairs that may affect buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @Keys4Rolex (The Seller) expresses excitement about selling this extremely clean example of a Buick Riviera, highlighting its beautiful color combination and the beloved 3800 series engine. The interior is noted for retaining the original smell from 1992, and the seller includes all relevant documentation such as books, manuals, and a window sticker. Additionally, the seller offers shipping assistance at wholesale prices, further showcasing commitment to customer service and engagement with potential buyers.
Neutral: Commenters, including @kink56 and @DFT, discuss the vehicle's features and conditions, raising questions about the functionality of the cassette player and CD player, while also expressing concerns over potential issues with the air ride suspension. While @kink56 has had numerous experiences with similar vehicles, emphasizing the unreliability of cassette players in older models, others like @David415m contribute practical advice about potential shock replacements, reflecting a mix of enthusiasm and skepticism regarding the car's upkeep.
Negative: Some comments contain criticism regarding transparency in sales tax; @badbadman queries additional charges that seem atypical. Additionally, there are warnings from @kink56 about the general decline in working components such as the radio and shocks in vintage models, suggesting that buyers should be cautious. Overall, some users express doubts about the vehicle's condition and maintenance, implying a market skepticism for those unfamiliar with the seller's claims.
|
 |
Positive: @Premierautofl (The Seller) expresses excitement about offering the well-kept 2001 SL500 with no accidents and a clean Carfax. @zildjian11 highlights the appealing features including the low mileage, recent maintenance, and overall great condition of the car, suggesting there's much to love about it. Further, @zildjian11 appreciates the seller's prompt responses and transparency regarding the vehicle's status, which should instill confidence in potential bidders.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions about the auction dynamics. @kkrewell remarks on how quickly the bidding escalated and @marksaint notes a sense of anticipation about the bids, questioning the high pricing despite the car's condition. @carstruck emphasizes the importance of having more detailed photos to assess the vehicle's condition further, acknowledging the low mileage and ownership background while calling for transparency.
Negative: @marksaint voices concern that the current bid may be too high despite the vehicle's appeal, highlighting the tension between the car's condition and pricing. @zildjian11 points out potential areas of concern such as scrapes on the front bumper and asked for clarifications on the car's features, suggesting that there are minor imperfections that need to be addressed. Additionally, @carstruck mentions a possible scrape on the undercarriage which raises questions about the car's overall history and condition.
|
 |
Positive: @daddydmm (The Seller) highlights that the 2012 F12 is one of the best cars he has owned, emphasizing its unparalleled convertible driving experience. @Kaz791 agrees, stating that his own 2012 650i M Sport convertible is incredible and exceptional value, making the seller's low-mileage vehicle potentially very appealing. @daddydmm (The Seller) expresses readiness to assist potential buyers by offering to pick them up from Ontario airport and facilitate in-person visits or inspections.
Neutral: The comments include details about the vehicle's performance, including figures from the Dinan website, such as a max horsepower gain of 95 and peak torque at 579 lb-ft. @daddydmm (The Seller) provides this technical information, showcasing the car's tuning potential. Additionally, a question from @JeanRalphio about the customer care package for the vehicle prompts a response from @daddydmm (The Seller), who admits he has no record of the activity but reassures that the car uses zero oil, indicating good maintenance.
Negative: There are some concerns raised, like @JeanRalphio's inquiry about the customer care package completion for the N63 engine, which may point to issues with this specific engine type. Furthermore, @hbjr's question about the tires suggests possible apprehension about the car's readiness for long drives, although @daddydmm (The Seller) reassures him that the tires are in good condition with only 9000 miles on them.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly praising its striking Dragon Red color. @GorgeousTobyFlamethrower highlighted its beauty by stating, "Beautiful car! Red never looked so good," while @Remy22 also remarked on the unique shade, saying, "Never seen Dragon Red color. Beautiful shade of red!! GLWTA." The overall aesthetic appeal of the car seems to resonate well with potential buyers, as evident from multiple positive remarks about its vibrant appearance.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on specific features and details of the vehicle. @G.O.G.B. inquired about options for extended warranties, while @pdavid2 verified that the car is not the Speed version and lacked the upgraded stereo. @Jackson1938 raised a question about the need for tire replacements with current mileage, suggesting a need for further details on the vehicle's history and maintenance practices. Additionally, @Greggs-Auto asked about the condition of the passenger front wheel and requested more pictures, indicating a desire for more transparency on the vehicle's condition.
Negative: A few comments brought up concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance and potential issues. @Jackson1938 questioned the necessity of changing spark plugs multiple times with only 20k miles, and @Greggs-Auto commented on the curb rash visible on the wheels, indicating possible neglect. @FogCity1959 mentioned that the vehicle might not have options like self-parking, which could explain the wheel damage. Furthermore, there were worries about the leather condition of the driver's seat, with @FogCity1959 specifically noting signs of loose leather, raising concerns about the car's overall care.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's unique features and capabilities. @70_duster commented on its attractive color, while @Aswayne89 and @jamesgomezjr were enthusiastic about its overall quality, referring to it as an "amazing specimen." Another commenter noted its suitability for a safe daily driver, mentioning the vehicle's advanced armoring technology. @CC350 praised the innovative ballistic packages offered by Armoris and shared a positive personal experience with a similar armored G63, highlighting its quiet performance compared to standard models. This enthusiasm reflects a general excitement about the vehicle's impressive mixture of luxury and protection.
Neutral: Several comments contained inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and modifications. @Gdaddy posed multiple questions regarding the armoring company's credentials, weight changes, and whether factory features like the remote start still functioned as intended. @Desertautosport (The Seller) responded by clarifying that the vehicle's factory design remained largely unchanged, emphasizing that the armoring process did not void warranties and maintained factory specifications. Commenters like @DMCperformancegarage sought clarification on whether warranties were affected, demonstrating interest in understanding the practical implications of the vehicle's modifications.
Negative: Not all feedback was entirely positive, with some commenters questioning the vehicle's design and functionality. @mbz2000 humorously remarked on the need for a new buyer due to the demise of a notorious figure, while @Wolfenhaus suggested that the vehicle should include gun ports. Others, like @nchristiano, made exaggerated remarks about its defensive capabilities, querying its resilience against grenades, which seemed to trivialize the serious intention behind its armoring. Additionally, some users expressed skepticism about the vehicle's functionality in emergency situations, raising concerns about potential performance degradation compared to standard vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @Uby67vw1958 praised the value of VW Touareg TDI vehicles, expressing that they are worth every penny. @IcemanBDub noted the excellent upkeep of the vehicle, sharing insights about a unique CD player feature in the glovebox, which enhances the vehicle's appeal. Many commenters, including @Sappronie, appreciated the aesthetic qualities and low mileage of the vehicle, indicating a strong interest and excitement about it. @IMissMySaab even remarked on the sudden availability of such low-mileage models, suggesting this one would fetch a great price over $30,000 at auction.
Neutral: Comments from @BDAS (The Seller) included detailed responses about the vehicle's features, maintenance, and ownership history, clarifying misconceptions regarding trim levels and key fobs. Questions regarding potential battery issues were also addressed with an assurance that there are currently no issues present with the vehicle's performance. There was mention of retrofitting the audio system for CarPlay compatibility at the buyer's request, demonstrating an openness to accommodating buyer interests and concerns.
Negative: There were some concerns raised by commenters like @MistaB and @lorbuch regarding the vehicle's compatibility with modern tech and potential expensive repairs linked to past issues with VW diesel engines. @dddohio highlighted a common weakness in diesel VW batteries, showcasing a specific apprehension about reliability. @linoman and @lorbuch pointed out the previous owner's battery troubles, indicating a level of skepticism about the vehicle's long-term dependability and the potential need for expensive repairs in the future.
|
 |
Positive: The comments indicate a strong appreciation for the vehicle's condition and backstory. @Sstrickstein (The Seller) emphasizes that the first-year Night Rod Vrod is in pristine condition after being revived from long-term storage. @bbmach highlights the beauty of the bike and expresses that although it hasn't been used much, these bikes are known for their performance when ridden. Overall, the excitement around finding a quality motorcycle, especially in such well-kept condition, is palpable in the discussions.
Neutral: Many participants in the comments engage in informative discussions about the bike's technical specifications and any potential issues. @gregoryindiana raises questions regarding known faults, comparing it to issues seen in other vehicles, while @Cheth20 shares knowledge about maintenance needs, particularly regarding the steering head bearings. These neutral comments focus on knowledge sharing and experience with the V-Rod motorcycles, contributing to a comprehensive overview without carrying a heavy bias.
Negative: Concerns arise around the bike's limited use and questions about possible weaknesses in its design. Some comments reference the factory issues regarding steering head bearings mentioned by @Cheth20, who notes they need lubrication within the first 10,000 miles. Additionally, @gregoryindiana seeks clarification about any known flaws, hinting at skepticism regarding the motorcycle's long-term reliability, even if @Sstrickstein assures potential buyers of its durability as one of Harley Davidson's most reliable engines.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlight the appealing aspects of the vehicle, particularly noting its color and engine performance. @70_duster appreciates the understated color of the car, calling it nice that it’s not super bright. @billyblyth expresses admiration for the Ford 390 engine, emphasizing its power and capability for a full-sized car. Overall, the initial reactions from commenters in favor of the vehicle suggest enthusiasm about its aesthetic and mechanical qualities, setting a positive tone for the auction.
Neutral: The seller, @AMS_NJ, engages with the community by providing informative updates throughout the auction process. They encourage potential bidders to reach out with any questions and express a willingness to clarify details regarding the vehicle's condition and history. For instance, in response to inquiries about the paint and components, the seller clarifies that while most of the paint appears original, there has been some refinishing work done, especially on the rocker panels. This proactive communication indicates an openness to discussion, which may facilitate trust and transparency.
Negative: While most comments are positive, there are some neutral and slightly critical inquiries about the vehicle's condition. @corvettom9 raises questions about the functionality of various parts and inquires about the originality of the paint and functionality of the odometer. Furthermore, @gord6 humorously notes that while the engine can outperform other vehicles, it may also lead to significant fuel consumption. These comments reflect a cautious perspective, showing that while the vehicle is generally well-regarded, there are still concerns over its maintenance history and efficiency.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their interest in the 2018 Tesla Model X P100D's appealing features. @Cheth20 noted that the vehicle looks great, while @leftlane11 appreciated the responsiveness of the seller in addressing questions about the supercharging capabilities. The Seller, @2FAM, provided thorough details regarding the car's status, including confirming the battery life at 94% and resolving issues regarding faux alerts in the system, which reassured potential buyers about the car's reliability and performance.
Neutral: Several questions emerged regarding the vehicle's features and specifications. Commenters like @iamsuperchris, @gs4106, and @MJC1962 were curious about the Full Self-Driving (FSD) capabilities and hardware specifications. While the seller provided insights, such as the feature being listed in photo 102, there was a consensus that additional clarifications were needed regarding software compatibility and any potential limitations due to the existing hardware in the car.
Negative: On the flip side, there were concerns raised about the vehicle's previous ownership and specific issues that could affect buyer confidence. @leftlane11 highlighted a potential problem with 'paid supercharging not available,' implying there might be underlying issues with battery ownership transfers. @MJC1962 expressed doubt over the hardware version and its implications for both performance and future software updates. These comments suggest some buyers were cautious, seeking more assurance regarding the long-term viability and current condition of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, describing it as stunning and beautiful. @ScottBallenger was captivated, stating, "Oh my God, I can't believe this exists - and knowing that it does may destroy my contentment forever." @Rhayner called it absolutely stunning, and @Italia_227 humorously declared that they would marry the car. Additionally, @Wob (The Seller) enthusiastically described the car as "fr@!#$!@in' beautiful! SO much style! SO much fun!" indicating a strong affection for the vehicle. Commenters also appreciated the artistic quality of the studio photos, with @kostasd commenting on their excellence.
Neutral: Several comments focused on details about the car, including its title and specifications. @bob9752 inquired about the car's title status, to which @kostasd replied, providing information on how it is listed as a 1953 Jaguar. @mtangney71 noted a similar version of the replica and mentioned that it attracts attention while driving, indicating a shared experience among enthusiasts. Comments also raised questions about the car's functionality, such as requests for driving videos and inquiries about the Toyota gearbox and body material from @oldcanuck and @BigHockeyPuck, respectively.
Negative: Conversely, some concerns were raised regarding potential issues with the car. @catpat8000 pointed out various engine assembly errors mentioned in paperwork, questioning whether these issues were resolved. @60Sucking3 expressed discomfort due to the vehicle's size in relation to their height, noting that driving it might present challenges. Additionally, the issue of an outstanding lien on the vehicle was brought up by multiple commenters, with @mtangney71 and @BloodyHell discussing what it might mean for prospective buyers, introducing a note of caution in the overall enthusiasm for the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Jdstell commented that the vehicle is 'absolutely gorgeous,' while @bluewillow referred to it as a '130k classic sitting there,' emphasizing its beauty. @mplavlegl shared a personal connection by noting that it is an 'amazing car, same as mine' and expresses a sense of investment in such vehicles. @Plywood222222 added to the positive remarks by praising the stunning Brittany Blue color, wishing the seller good luck in the auction. @Vegas2021 (The Seller) expressed gratitude for the kind words and recognized that 'mistakes happen.'
Neutral: @Motordad8 noted the anticipation of waiting to see where the bidding will go after kicking off 'like a painted stripe/Carbon Fiber Track pack car!' They also mentioned the potential frustration that a bidding error could cause for the auction's rhythm. @PP0001 brought up an interesting observation regarding the recent influx of three Shelby GT500 Heritage Edition examples on the platform, inviting more discussion about this phenomenon. @Inthehighdesert echoed this sentiment by noting that although the error was dealt with promptly, the overlap of similar cars is 'not a good look for BAT.'
Negative: @Motordad8 expressed skepticism about the nature of the bidding error, suggesting it was a 'hasty bid without doing due diligence.' They articulated a concern that such errors could frustrate sellers and disrupt auction dynamics. Furthermore, @thelastride inquired about potential imperfections with the vehicle, indicating some apprehension regarding its condition despite the positive comments. This highlights a degree of caution among bidders related to the vehicle's state, questioning even the minor details like body work and interior quality.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the beauty of the vehicle, with @RussFerns expressing nostalgia for a similar 2013 E350 that he previously owned. The positive sentiments about the car's design suggest that it is visually appealing and has a strong fan base among past owners.
Neutral: @aSingh39 welcomes participants to the auction and encourages potential bidders to ask questions, which indicates an open and friendly selling approach. The auction details are clearly presented, including a reminder that the highest bidder will win the car in seven days. This neutral tone sets a straightforward context for the transaction without overwhelming enthusiasm or negativity.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle in the provided comments. While @RussFerns mentions missing his previous 2013 model, there are no direct criticisms or concerns raised about the current E350 being auctioned.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive condition and rarity. @BlueCT remarked that it should be added to someone's collection while @Big_DaddyRL called it a fine example of a Fox body. @Z282SLO noted the vehicle's low mileage and original features, praising its originality and suggesting it would garner a competitive auction. Overall, there is a shared sentiment that this car is stunning and deserves a high selling price, with @Detroit_Iron stating it represents a phenomenal preservation effort and @Sonicgt2003 emphasizing its collector car potential.
Neutral: Several comments provided additional context and advice regarding the vehicle. @jsadamski raised a question about the condition of the headliner, while @993fan assured that any wrinkles present are typical and from initial production. @idriveemine pointed out some visible damage to the mufflers and chassis and sought clarification, which prompted the seller to speculate it may be from a speed bump incident. In addition, a few users noted that the car's horsepower ratings have been the subject of past controversy, with @johnnydarkgt350 and @Z282SLO discussing Ford's marketing strategies surrounding the specifications.
Negative: There were some concerns mentioned by commenters about the vehicle's minor imperfections. @jsadamski questioned the headliner condition, indicating it might have areas needing attention, and @idriveemine pointed out damage on the underside of the car. Overall, while most comments are overwhelmingly positive, there were remarks acknowledging slight issues that come with the age and use of the vehicle, reflective of its history.
|
 |
Positive: @stang1991r complimented the Mustang's appearance, calling it a nice looking vehicle. @Gdlv2020 mentioned that the car has only been driven less than 300 miles since purchase and highlights its impressive 600 HP power output, along with the fact that it still has the smell of a new car. @Gdlv2020 also notes that the car is well-maintained, with recent oil changes and new tires, inviting potential buyers to test drive it and emphasizing the powerful manual transmission.
Neutral: @Stallion007 asked questions regarding the supercharger, specifically its installation details and maintenance history. @Gdlv2020 responded to these inquiries, indicating that the supercharger was factory-installed and that the car had some maintenance done last year. The seller addressed inquiries about the vehicle's history in a transparent manner.
Negative: @Skyman81 questioned the quick sale of the vehicle given its minimal miles, implying there might be a concern or reason behind the seller's decision to sell so soon. @Gdlv2020 acknowledged this question, responding that it is simply time for someone new to enjoy the car, but this raises potential uncertainty for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the Ferrari 296 GTB for its stunning appearance and specifications. @Eagle32, the seller, expressed enthusiasm for the car's unique Blu Corsa metallic paint and red special interior, highlighting that it is likely a one-of-a-kind vehicle given the limited availability of the model. Commenters like @Rortho and @CSM1234 noted the attractiveness of the car in person, with @Glenn930 emphasizing the impressive performance specs, especially the power output of its hybrid V6 engine, and the inclusion of the front lift option as a beneficial feature. The car’s design was also praised, with @Scott_in_FL describing it as part of a renaissance for Ferrari's aesthetics, showcasing a fresh approach that balances modernity with tradition.
Neutral: Neutral comments primarily focused on observations about the car's specifications and features without strong inclinations towards either praise or criticism. @bringatrailer noted that new photos were added to the listing, while @Eagle32 provided detailed information about the factory warranty and maintenance plans that come with the vehicle. Commenters like @Glenn930 and @clean_machina discussed specifics regarding the car's suspension and front lift option, indicating their knowledge and interest without expressing a strong emotional reaction. Additionally, the mention of future values by @Rortho highlighted the evolving market for this model without veering towards sentimentality.
Negative: Negative remarks were scarce, but some concerns arose over the perception of the 296 GTB compared to older models. @Eagle32 acknowledged that some purists criticize the hybrid engine and the reduced cylinder count, wondering how this may affect the vehicle's reception among traditional Ferrari enthusiasts. However, he countered this viewpoint by pointing out that the integration of hybrid technology is becoming commonplace in other high-performance brands. Overall, while there were very few overtly negative comments, the hesitancy of some enthusiasts regarding the hybrid engine was noted as a point of contention.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a generally enthusiastic reception for the 2025 Ford Expedition being sold by @motorcarmarketusa (The Seller). @bemrfst expresses admiration, calling it the best-looking Expedition they've seen and considering placing a bid. This indicates that the vehicle's aesthetics are appealing and garnering interest among potential buyers. Additionally, the seller's prompt and informative responses to questions about features and included items further contributes to a positive impression of the vehicle and the overall sales process.
Neutral: Several inquiries seek clarification on specific features of the Expedition, which suggests a level of interest and engagement from potential buyers. @jatkinson3 asks about fog lights, to which @motorcarmarketusa (The Seller) clarifies that it was not a factory option. @Kleanfreak inquires about the inclusion of keys and @awrdgrs asks about a hitch cover, indicating that buyers are assessing practicality and necessary accessories. The seller responds to these queries with clear and concise answers, helping to maintain transparency.
Negative: There are no explicit negative comments present in the discussion about the vehicle. However, @belairlover notes the absence of front massage features, which could be seen as a drawback depending on individual preferences for luxury attributes. The explanation provided by @motorcarmarketusa (The Seller) about features and options illustrates limitations in available upgrades, but no complaints are directly stated by respondents, keeping the overall sentiment skewed positively.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the rarity and desirability of the Mach 1, especially noting that there were fewer than 700 produced in white in 2004, making it a unique find. @justsurfing expresses admiration as a fellow original owner, stating it's a 'Beautiful Original owner Mach!' and echoes support with a friendly 'GLWA' (Good Luck With Auction). Enthusiasts like @Mychordistooshort passionately defend the aesthetics of the Mach 1, citing its special status among Mustangs, while @BMcD427 (The Seller) showcases their dedication to the Mustang brand, illustrating a deep appreciation for the car's legacy.
Neutral: Numerous questions from potential buyers indicate interest in the vehicle's history and condition. @Z282SLO inquires whether the tires are indeed original and suggests checking the date codes, while @Gman01 asks for more detailed visuals, including full underside photos and a running video. @RatherHaveAn02TransAm questions the storage conditions and potential highway driving issues for the car, demonstrating a thorough approach to evaluating its condition, which the seller responds to satisfactorily.
Negative: There are concerns about the description and details provided by the seller. @Z282SLO points out the unusual phrasing regarding the tires, urging the seller to clarify if the tires were ever replaced, expressing skepticism about the claim that they are original. Additionally, @justsurfing raises a question about the repainting of the shock towers, hinting at possible underlying issues. On a broader note, @bmoul42 appears dismissive of @Mychordistooshort's views, indicating differing opinions on the Mach 1’s looks compared to the Terminators, which introduces some contention into the comments.
|
 |
Positive: @Rweaves6 appreciated the listing, calling the car a beautiful SC and inquiring about its matching numbers and OEM status. @sga3532 praised the specifications and interior, while @selizald noted the car's appealing cork interior and overall condition, referring to it as a great 48-year-old 911. @techweenie, who previously sold the vehicle, described it as a nice driver with extensive records, indicating confidence in its quality and reliability, which @Ridiculies echoed by commenting on the enjoyment of similar cars. @BloodyHell complimented the bright chrome trim and the unpolished Fuchs, agreeing with others' positive sentiments about the car's aesthetics.
Neutral: @sldortho (The Seller) addressed various inquiries regarding the car's condition and history, confirming that transmission issues from 2023 have been resolved and the engine rebuild was thorough, but with no rust present. Additional comments discussed the interior and minor concerns, such as the upper seat lever position in a photo and the quality of seals seen in various images, with @KatManDew providing clarification on the upholstery's condition. Other bidders, including @tonupbklyn, engaged in discussions about technical specifics and functionality, like the tachometer and potential oil seepage observed in photos.
Negative: Despite the generally positive feedback, some concerns were raised. @pf2d, for example, questioned the nature of a previous transmission issue and requested clarity on various mechanical aspects, indicating a desire for thorough reassurance regarding ongoing usability. @vamela pointedly asked about the chain tensioners during the engine rebuild, reflecting a cautious approach among prospective buyers. @zigermanz highlighted a potentially disconnected wire for the back-up light, reflecting some apprehension about the vehicle's electronics and overall fit and finish possibly deviating from 'mint' condition, as specified by @sldortho.
|
 |
Positive: @lewtus expressed enthusiasm about the Saab 9-5 wagon, emphasizing that you can't beat it. @Oldnfast commented positively on the car's condition, noting it was clearly well-loved by previous owners. @martinaricejr confirmed the durability of the automatic transmission, mentioning their own high-mileage Saab 9-5 ARC Sport Combi as evidence of its reliability. Additionally, @EstobanMcQueen shared their positive experience with their own similarly specced car, highlighting its performance after proper maintenance.
Neutral: @mkmelichar inquired about the navigation system updates, indicating a common curiosity associated with older vehicles, while @porkpiehat questioned the durability of automatic transmissions in these cars. Sellers Mark_Harris mentioned that they have records of repairs and maintenance from the previous owner, reinforcing the idea that the car has been well cared for, but also addressed some maintenance questions regarding the rotors and roof repaint.
Negative: However, there were concerns raised about the vehicle's history, such as @lewtus mentioning potential early issues with the timing chain and inspection for dog leg rust, suggesting these problems may be more common among Saab 9-5 vehicles. @sfmark questioned the reason behind the roof repaint, indicating that this might point to underlying cosmetic or structural issues. @SaabFan4 raised a point about the previous owner's financial loss in selling the car, suggesting that while it appears well cared for, its market value might not meet the owner's investment.
|
 |
Positive: @FirstClassExotics (The Seller) received multiple commendations for the vehicle's impressive torque and overall condition. Commentors like @afmuro72 noted that it is capable of hauling bottoms effectively. Others, like @silverf250s, expressed enthusiasm for modification potential, stating that it could be transformed into a powerful machine. The seller highlighted that the car is well-equipped and managed to resolve previous issues such as the adaptive headlight malfunction, ensuring potential buyers that the vehicle is functioning properly now.
Neutral: Comments regarding the maintenance history raised some questions. @Fastdog7 pointed out significant gaps in the CARFAX maintenance records, which could imply potential issues with the diesel engine's longevity if not serviced properly. @DKDiesel requested details about the vehicle's transmission service, suspension condition, and key availability, to which the seller responded with limited yet assuring information about its current state but acknowledged the lack of complete service records.
Negative: Concerns were brought up regarding the vehicle's maintenance and service history. @Fastdog7 emphasized the importance of regular oil changes to prevent carbon buildup on diesel engines, while @DKDiesel's inquiries about various fluid services indicated a lack of comprehensive maintenance records. Additionally, @jgunn823 interpreted the seller's reassurances as somewhat vague, suggesting that while the car might pass inspection, it may not be in perfect condition. These comments reflect a cautionary attitude towards potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters appreciate the vehicle as a great value for the price, noting its impressive specs and character. @Sarnaud, the seller, highlights that it could be considered one of the cheapest supercars available and mentions his personal enjoyment of the car, despite its smaller size. @baileybob427 humorously reflects on the missed opportunity to buy the car for a much lower price, suggesting that it feels like a steal.
Neutral: There is a mix of inquiries regarding the vehicle's mechanical condition and its history. @PoolMaster raises questions about the reasons behind the previous buyer's withdrawal, while @dbgaul is curious about specific issues with the air conditioning and electric windows. @DazedandConfused76 seeks clarity on the car's build process and who was responsible for constructing it, receiving a detailed response from @Sarnaud about the previous owner’s involvement.
Negative: Some comments express concerns, particularly regarding the vehicle's mechanical aspects. @cdlINSTR21 questions the smoke emitting from the exhaust, prompting a clarification from @thefleshrocket that it's just steam from a cold start. @TechnoHippie compares the vehicle unfavorably to the C8, suggesting that the latter is a superior choice, while @notlikelytowin4 hints at possible reserve price issues without expanding further.
|
 |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics has received praise for sourcing unique and desirable vehicles, specifically highlighting their commitment to smooth, transparent transactions. Their high Google Reviews score of 4.8/5.0 from customers like @Mfm1170, who appreciates the cocoa interior, reflects satisfaction with the dealership's reputation. The seller also reassured potential buyers about the Boxster S's condition, stating that it has never suffered damage and only has minor cosmetic imperfections.
Neutral: There are several inquiries about the vehicle's condition and specific components. @LVB raised a concern regarding the reported damage on the Carfax report and sought clarification. @Westonp80 noted that while the car looks beautiful, the stuck cupholder and old tires could deter buyers, but appreciated the offer to replace the tires. Meanwhile, @browndog and @ED_C discussed the IMS bearing's servicing history, expressing curiosity about its maintenance and potential costs associated with repairs and replacements.
Negative: Comments indicate some concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance and functionality, particularly about the IMS bearing and the cupholder issue. @Tigerpaw96 mentioned that fixing such details could yield better returns, implying neglect on the seller's part which may affect buyer eagerness. Additionally, inquiries about potential repair costs from @Westonp80 reveal that a comprehensive engine replacement could be financially daunting, highlighting buyer hesitance due to uncertainty surrounding the reliability of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors generally hold a positive view of the vehicle, praising its impressive engine build and unique design. @LarryM highlights the quality of the engine, noting that it is not merely a standard supercharger installation but a well-thought-out performance enhancement that suggests lasting value for enthusiasts. Additionally, @RumbleAuto admires the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle, specifically mentioning how beautifully the C5 Corvettes look in Speedway White, calling this example sensational. @Airmanwhite01 (The Seller) provides an extensive and detailed description of the car, emphasizing its pristine condition, rare color, and emotional value, underscoring its status as a collector's item that offers both nostalgia and high-performance capabilities.
Neutral: Neutral comments reflect various inquiries and suggestions about the vehicle's specifications and potential modifications. @Jiu-jitsu99 probes into the specifics of the supercharger setup, asking whether upgraded brackets are installed and inquiring about the intercoolers and radiator. @TooManyTabs questions the accuracy of the power numbers provided, prompting a discussion on dyno measurements and conversions. There is a mix of curiosity about the vehicle's upgrades and its overall presentation, with @Federal inquiring about any suspension modifications in light of the significant power increase. Seller responses convey factual details, ensuring potential buyers have clear information about the vehicle.
Negative: Negative comments center around a few areas of concern. @pepperkitty questions the reason behind the vehicle's sale after only six months, suggesting potential issues with the car or the seller's commitment. @roninrider receives feedback from other users for his comment, which was considered non-constructive, indicating some negativity around user interactions related to the vehicle's sale process. Furthermore, @TooManyTabs' scrutiny about the changes and claims made in the listing, along with their detailed evaluation of power numbers, could be interpreted as skepticism about the vehicle's transparency and the seller's integrity.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle's low mileage, with @georgepehanick noting that it appears to have been well cared for despite being 25 years old. @Bmorris35 (The Seller) mentioned that the interior is exceptional, with no rips or tears in the seats that have been regularly conditioned. Additionally, @bigben-74 affirmed the tires were replaced recently with high-quality all-season tires, demonstrating ongoing maintenance efforts by the seller.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about the vehicle's service history, with @Smithabq asking for service records to corroborate @Bmorris35 (The Seller)'s claims about regular oil changes and maintenance. @Dartmouthtoyo and @TeamSled requested to see these maintenance records and expressed curiosity about the condition of the seats and sunroof liner, indicating some wear not consistent with the mileage. @RTDaleAz brought up a question about the vehicle's ownership history, seeking clarity on how the CarFax report aligns with its dealer acquisition.
Negative: There were criticisms as well, notably from @89lincolntc who commented on an unsatisfactory installation of the stereo system, suggesting it detracts from the overall quality of the vehicle. @TeamSled pointed out potential discrepancies in the wear of the seats and sunroof liner relative to the mileage, raising concerns about the vehicle’s condition. @Smithabq and others echoed concerns regarding the minimal information on CarFax, indicating skepticism about the vehicle's service history.
|
|
|